Waterford City Council
September 5, 2024

Appendix D
Standard Specifications for Grading

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING

Page D-2
Clearing and grubbing should consist of the removal of vegetation such as brush, grass, woods, stumps, trees, root of trees and otherwise deleterious natural materials from the areas to be graded. Clearing and grubbing should extend to the outside of all proposed excavation and fill areas.

Demolition should include removal of buildings, structures, foundations, reservoirs, utilities (including underground pipelines, septic tanks, leach fields, seepage pits, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, etc.) and other man-made surface and subsurface improvements from the areas to be graded. Demolition of utilities should include proper capping and/or rerouting pipelines at the project perimeter and cutoff and capping of wells in accordance with the requirements of the governing authorities and the recommendations of the geotechnical consultant at the time of demolition.

Trees, plants or man-made improvements not planned to be removed or demolished should be protected by the contractor from damage or injury.

Debris generated during clearing, grubbing and/or demolition operations should be wasted from areas to be graded and disposed off-site. Clearing, grubbing and demolition operations should be performed under the observation of the geotechnical consultant.

Section 5 - Site Protection
Protection of the site during the period of grading should be the responsibility of the contractor.

Unless other provisions are made in writing and agreed upon among the concerned parties, completion of a portion of the project should not be considered to preclude that portion or adjacent areas from the requirements for site protection until such time as the entire project is complete as identified by the geotechnical consultant, the client and the regulating agencies.

Precautions should be taken during the performance of site clearing, excavations and grading to protect the work site from flooding, ponding or inundation by poor or improper surface drainage.

Temporary provisions should be made during the rainy season to adequately direct surface drainage away from and off the work site. Where low areas cannot be avoided, pumps should be kept on hand to continually remove water during periods of rainfall.

Rain related damage should be considered to include, but may not be limited to, erosion, silting, saturation, swelling, structural distress and other adverse conditions as determined by the geotechnical consultant. Soil adversely affected should be classified as unsuitable materials and should be subject to overexcavation and replacement with compacted fill or other remedial grading as recommended by the geotechnical consultant.

RES 2024-42
Appendix D
Standard Specifications for Grading

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING

Page D-3
The contractor should be responsible for the stability of all temporary excavations.

Recommendations by the geotechnical consultant pertaining to temporary excavations (e.g., backcuts) are made in consideration of stability of the completed project and, therefore, should not be considered to preclude the responsibilities of the contractor. Recommendations by the geotechnical consultant should not be considered to preclude requirements that are more restrictive by the regulating agencies. The contractor should provide during periods of extensive rainfall plastic sheeting to prevent unprotected slopes from becoming saturated and unstable.

When deemed appropriate by the geotechnical consultant or governing agencies the contractor shall install checkdams, desilting basins, sand bags or other drainage control measures.

In relatively level areas and/or slope areas, where saturated soil and/or erosion gullies exist to depths of greater than 1.0 foot; they should be overexcavated and replaced as compacted fill in accordance with the applicable specifications. Where affected materials exist to depths of 1.0 foot or less below proposed finished grade, remedial grading by moisture conditioning in-place, followed by thorough recompaction in accordance with the applicable grading guidelines herein may be attempted. If the desired results are not achieved, all affected materials should be overexcavated and replaced as compacted fill in accordance with the slope repair recommendations herein. If field conditions dictate, the geotechnical consultant may recommend other slope repair procedures.

Section 6 - Excavations

6.1 Unsuitable Materials
Materials that are unsuitable should be excavated under observation and recommendations of the geotechnical consultant. Unsuitable materials include, but may not be limited to, dry, loose, soft, wet, organic compressible natural soils and fractured, weathered, soft bedrock and nonengineered or otherwise deleterious fill materials.

Material identified by the geotechnical consultant as unsatisfactory due to its moisture conditions should be overexcavated; moisture conditioned as needed, to a uniform at or above optimum moisture condition before placement as compacted fill.

If during the course of grading adverse geotechnical conditions are exposed which were not anticipated in the preliminary soil report as determined by the geotechnical consultant additional exploration, analysis, and treatment of these problems may be recommended.

RES 2024-42
Appendix D
Standard Specifications for Grading

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING

Page D-4

6.2 Cut Slopes
Unless otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant and approved by the regulating agencies, permanent cut slopes should not be steeper than 2:1 (horizontal:
vertical).

The geotechnical consultant should observe cut slope excavation and if these excavations expose loose cohesionless, significantly fractured or otherwise unsuitable material, the materials should be overexcavated and replaced with a compacted stabilization fill. If encountered specific cross section details should be obtained from the Geotechnical Consultant.

When extensive cut slopes are excavated or these cut slopes are made in the direction of the prevailing drainage, a non-erodible diversion swale (brow ditch) should be provided at the top of the slope.

6.3 Pad Areas
All lot pad areas, including side yard terrace containing both cut and fill materials, transitions, located less than 3 feet deep should be overexcavated to a depth of 3 feet and replaced with a uniform compacted fill blanket of 3 feet. Actual depth of overexcavation may vary and should be delineated by the geotechnical consultant during grading, especially where deep or drastic transitions are present.

For pad areas created above cut or natural slopes, positive drainage should be established away from the top-of-slope. This may be accomplished utilizing a berm drainage swale and/or an appropriate pad gradient. A gradient in soil areas away from the top-of-slopes of 2 percent or greater is recommended.

Section 7 - Compacted Fill
All fill materials should have fill quality, placement, conditioning and compaction as specified below or as approved by the geotechnical consultant.

7.1 Fill Material Quality
Excavated on-site or import materials which are acceptable to the geotechnical consultant may be utilized as compacted fill, provided trash, vegetation and other deleterious materials are removed prior to placement. All import materials anticipated for use on-site should be sampled tested and approved prior to and placement is in conformance with the requirements outlined.

RES 2024-42
Appendix D
Standard Specifications for Grading

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING

Page D-5
Rocks 12 inches in maximum and smaller may be utilized within compacted fill provided sufficient fill material is placed and thoroughly compacted over and around all rock to effectively fill rock voids. The amount of rock should not exceed 40 percent by dry weight passing the 3/4-inch sieve. The geotechnical consultant may vary those requirements as field conditions dictate.

Where rocks greater than 12 inches but less than four feet of maximum dimension are generated during grading, or otherwise desired to be placed within an engineered fill, special handling in accordance with the recommendations below. Rocks greater than four feet should be broken down or disposed off-site.

7.2 Placement of Fill
Prior to placement of fill material, the geotechnical consultant should observe and approve the area to receive fill. After observation and approval, the exposed ground surface should be scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 inches. The scarified material should be conditioned (i.e. moisture added or air dried by continued discing) to achieve a moisture content at or slightly above optimum moisture conditions and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum density or as otherwise recommended in the soils report or by appropriate government agencies.

Compacted fill should then be placed in thin horizontal lifts not exceeding eight inches in loose thickness prior to compaction. Each lift should be moisture conditioned as needed, thoroughly blended to achieve a consistent moisture content at or slightly above optimum and thoroughly compacted by mechanical methods to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum dry density. Each lift should be treated in a like manner until the desired finished grades are achieved.

The contractor should have suitable and sufficient mechanical compaction equipment and watering apparatus on the job site to handle the amount of fill being placed in consideration of moisture retention properties of the materials and weather conditions.

When placing fill in horizontal lifts adjacent to areas sloping steeper than 5:1 (horizontal:
vertical), horizontal keys and vertical benches should be excavated into the adjacent slope area. Keying and benching should be sufficient to provide at least six-foot wide benches and a minimum of four feet of vertical bench height within the firm natural ground, firm bedrock or engineered compacted fill. No compacted fill should be placed in an area after keying and benching until the geotechnical consultant has reviewed the area.

Material generated by the benching operation should be moved sufficiently away from RES 2024-42
Appendix D
Standard Specifications for Grading

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING

Page D-6
the bench area to allow for the recommended review of the horizontal bench prior to placement of fill.

Within a single fill area where grading procedures dictate two or more separate fills, temporary slopes (false slopes) may be created. When placing fill adjacent to a false slope, benching should be conducted in the same manner as above described. At least a 3-foot vertical bench should be established within the firm core of adjacent approved compacted fill prior to placement of additional fill. Benching should proceed in at least 3-foot vertical increments until the desired finished grades are achieved.

Prior to placement of additional compacted fill following an overnight or other grading delay, the exposed surface or previously compacted fill should be processed by scarification, moisture conditioning as needed to at or slightly above optimum moisture content, thoroughly blended and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum dry density. Where unsuitable materials exist to depths of greater than one foot, the unsuitable materials should be over-excavated.

Following a period of flooding, rainfall or overwatering by other means, no additional fill should be placed until damage assessments have been made and remedial grading performed as described herein.

Rocks 12 inch in maximum dimension and smaller may be utilized in the compacted fill provided the fill is placed and thoroughly compacted over and around all rock. No oversize material should be used within 3 feet of finished pad grade and within 1 foot of other compacted fill areas. Rocks 12 inches up to four feet maximum dimension should be placed below the upper 10 feet of any fill and should not be closer than 15 feet to any slope face. These recommendations could vary as locations of improvements dictate.

Where practical, oversized material should not be placed below areas where structures or deep utilities are proposed. Oversized material should be placed in windrows on a clean, overexcavated or unyielding compacted fill or firm natural ground surface. Select native or imported granular soil (S.E. 30 or higher) should be placed and thoroughly flooded over and around all windrowed rock, such that voids are filled. Windrows of oversized material should be staggered so those successive strata of oversized material are not in the same vertical plane.

It may be possible to dispose of individual larger rock as field conditions dictate and as recommended by the geotechnical consultant at the time of placement.

RES 2024-42
Appendix D
Standard Specifications for Grading

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING

Page D-7
The contractor should assist the geotechnical consultant and/or his representative by digging test pits for removal determinations and/or for testing compacted fill. The contractor should provide this work at no additional cost to the owner or contractor's client.

Fill should be tested by the geotechnical consultant for compliance with the recommended relative compaction and moisture conditions. Field density testing should conform to ASTM Method of Test D 1556-00, D 2922-04. Tests should be conducted at a minimum of approximately two vertical feet or approximately 1,000 to 2,000 cubic yards of fill placed. Actual test intervals may vary as field conditions dictate. Fill found not to be in conformance with the grading recommendations should be removed or otherwise handled as recommended by the geotechnical consultant.

7.3 Fill Slopes
Unless otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant and approved by the regulating agencies, permanent fill slopes should not be steeper than 2:1 (horizontal:
vertical).

Except as specifically recommended in these grading guidelines compacted fill slopes should be over-built two to five feet and cut back to grade, exposing the firm, compacted fill inner core. The actual amount of overbuilding may vary as field conditions dictate. If the desired results are not achieved, the existing slopes should be overexcavated and reconstructed under the guidelines of the geotechnical consultant. The degree of overbuilding shall be increased until the desired compacted slope surface condition is achieved. Care should be taken by the contractor to provide thorough mechanical compaction to the outer edge of the overbuilt slope surface.

At the discretion of the geotechnical consultant, slope face compaction may be attempted by conventional construction procedures including backrolling. The procedure must create a firmly compacted material throughout the entire depth of the slope face to the surface of the previously compacted firm fill intercore.

During grading operations, care should be taken to extend compactive effort to the outer edge of the slope. Each lift should extend horizontally to the desired finished slope surface or more as needed to ultimately established desired grades. Grade during construction should not be allowed to roll off at the edge of the slope. It may be helpful to elevate slightly the outer edge of the slope. Slough resulting from the placement of individual lifts should not be allowed to drift down over previous lifts. At intervals not RES 2024-42
Appendix D
Standard Specifications for Grading
Page D-8
exceeding four feet in vertical slope height or the capability of available equipment, whichever is less, fill slopes should be thoroughly dozer trackrolled.

For pad areas above fill slopes, positive drainage should be established away from the top-of-slope. This may be accomplished using a berm and pad gradient of at least two percent.

Section 8 - Trench Backfill
Utility and/or other excavation of trench backfill should, unless otherwise recommended, be compacted by mechanical means. Unless otherwise recommended, the degree of compaction should be a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum density.

Within slab areas, but outside the influence of foundations, trenches up to one foot wide and two feet deep may be backfilled with sand and consolidated by jetting, flooding or by mechanical means. If on-site materials are utilized, they should be wheel-rolled, tamped or otherwise compacted to a firm condition. For minor interior trenches, density testing may be deleted or spot testing may be elected if deemed necessary, based on review of backfill operations during construction.

If utility contractors indicate that it is undesirable to use compaction equipment in close proximity to a buried conduit, the contractor may elect the utilization of light weight mechanical compaction equipment and/or shading of the conduit with clean, granular material, which should be thoroughly jetted in-place above the conduit, prior to initiating mechanical compaction procedures. Other methods of utility trench compaction may also be appropriate, upon review of the geotechnical consultant at the time of construction.

In cases where clean granular materials are proposed for use in lieu of native materials or where flooding or jetting is proposed, the procedures should be considered subject to review by the geotechnical consultant. Clean granular backfill and/or bedding are not recommended in slope areas.

Section 9 - Drainage
Where deemed appropriate by the geotechnical consultant, canyon subdrain systems should be installed in accordance with NATS recommendations during grading.

Typical subdrains for compacted fill buttresses, slope stabilization or sidehill masses, should be installed in accordance with the specifications.

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING
RES 2024-42

Appendix D
Standard Specifications for Grading

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING

Page D-9
Roof, pad and slope drainage should be directed away from slopes and areas of structures to suitable disposal areas via non-erodible devices (i.e., gutters, downspouts, and concrete swales).

For drainage in extensively landscaped areas near structures, (i.e., within four feet) a minimum of 5 percent gradient away from the structure should be maintained. Pad drainage of at least 2 percent should be maintained over the remainder of the site.

Drainage patterns established at the time of fine grading should be maintained throughout the life of the project. Property owners should be made aware that altering drainage patterns could be detrimental to slope stability and foundation performance.

Section 10 - Slope Maintenance

10.1 - Landscape Plants
To enhance surficial slope stability, slope planting should be accomplished at the completion of grading. Slope planting should consist of deep-rooting vegetation requiring little watering. Plants native to the southern California area and plants relative to native plants are generally desirable. Plants native to other semi-arid and arid areas may also be appropriate. A Landscape Architect should be the best party to consult regarding actual types of plants and planting configuration.

10.2 - Irrigation
Irrigation pipes should be anchored to slope faces, not placed in trenches excavated into slope faces.

Slope irrigation should be minimized. If automatic timing devices are utilized on irrigation systems, provisions should be made for interrupting normal irrigation during periods of rainfall.

10.3 - Repair
As a precautionary measure, plastic sheeting should be readily available, or kept on hand, to protect all slope areas from saturation by periods of heavy or prolonged rainfall. This measure is strongly recommended, beginning with the period prior to landscape planting.

If slope failures occur, the geotechnical consultant should be contacted for a field review of site conditions and development of recommendations for evaluation and repair.

If slope failures occur as a result of exposure to period of heavy rainfall, the failure areas and currently unaffected areas should be covered with plastic sheeting to protect against additional saturation.

RES 2024-42
Appendix D
Standard Specifications for Grading

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING

Page D-10
In the accompanying Standard Details, appropriate repair procedures are illustrated for superficial slope failures (i.e., occurring typically within the outer one foot to three feet of a slope face).

RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
RES 2024-42
APPENDIX E
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development
Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
Prepared for:

Shawn Fitzpatrick
UC Construction
February 15, 2024
WC23-4051
RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................1 Purpose....................................................................................................................................................................................1 Overview of Proposed Projects ......................................................................................................................................2 Policy Background...............................................................................................................................................................2 Senate Bill 743 ..............................................................................................................................................................2 VMT Thresholds of Significance.....................................................................................................................................3 COVID-19................................................................................................................................................................................5 Performance Targets ..........................................................................................................................................................6 Study Area and Periods.....................................................................................................................................................6 II. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ......................................................................................8 Existing Roadway System .................................................................................................................................................8 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian System ......................................................................................................................8 Existing Transit System......................................................................................................................................................9 III. CEQA COMPLIANCE ........................................................................................................................10 Evaluation of Transportation System Impacts (VMT)......................................................................................... 10 Evaluation of Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Impacts ...................................................................................... 12 Pedestrian Facilities ................................................................................................................................................. 12 Bicycle Facilities......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Transit Facilities ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Evaluation of Safety Impacts ........................................................................................................................................ 14 IV. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY..........................................................................................................15 Intersection Operations.................................................................................................................................................. 15 Level of Service Definition............................................................................................................................................. 15 Intersection Performance Targets.............................................................................................................................. 16 Project Trip Generation .................................................................................................................................................. 16 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment............................................................................................................... 17 V. INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS.................................................................................18 Intersection Operations.................................................................................................................................................. 18 RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
List of Figures
Figure 1: Project Location............................................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 2: Site Access......................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 3: Project Site 1 Trip Distribution .................................................................................................................................. 23 Figure 4: Project Site 2 Trip Distribution .................................................................................................................................. 24 Figure 5: Project Site 3 Trip Distribution .................................................................................................................................. 25 List of Tables
Table 1: Housing Element Vacant Site Inventory Consistency Check..............................................................................4 Table 2: Average Citywide Home-Based VMT Per Capita ................................................................................................. 11 Table 3: Level of Service Definitions for Study Intersections ........................................................................................... 16 Table 4: Project Trip Generation.................................................................................................................................................. 17 Table 5: Intersection Operations Analysis................................................................................................................................ 19 Appendices
Appendix A: Volumes and Lane Configurations ................................................................................................................... 26 Appendix B: Technical Calculations............................................................................................................................................ 27 RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
1 | P a g e
I. INTRODUCTION

PURPOSE
This study analyzes the transportation impacts associated with the proposed Waterford Residential Development Projects (“projects”) located in the City of Waterford. This report includes an analysis for three separate residential projects being proposed concurrently, as described in greater detail later in the “Overview of Proposed Projects” section below. This report is separated into two analyses – one analysis intended to disclose any potential environmental impacts in compliance with CEQA, and one analysis intended to identify any potential impacts to the local transportation network.

For this study, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is the primary travel-related metric used to identify the project’s significant transportation impacts under CEQA. Impacts to the bicycle, pedestrian, and transit network, and safety are also evaluated.

The local transportation network analysis includes a traffic operations analysis under existing and existing plus project (for each individual project) conditions. Level of service (LOS) and delay are provided to help evaluate the project’s consistency with General Plan policies and to understand how project trips would affect intersection operations. Due to Senate Bill (SB) 743, which is described in greater detail under the “Policy Background” section of this report, this report does not identify significant intersection LOS impacts and mitigation measures. Instead, it identifies intersection performance targets and then determines whether the intersection meets the performance target for all analysis scenarios.

The proposed projects impact analyses are presented in Section III and the intersection operations analyses are presented in Section V. All figures can be found at the end of the report.

RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
2 | P a g e

OVERVIEW OF PROPOSED PROJECTS
This report summarizes the transportation impacts of three separate single-family residential developments proposed in the City of Waterford. Due to the location and planned construction of the three projects, all projects are being studied in one report. In general, each project is evaluated individually; however, the traffic operations analysis includes one “existing plus all projects” scenario to evaluate intersection operations with construction of all three projects. Each project is described in greater detail below. Figure 1 displays the location of the three projects. Figure 2 displays the proposed access for each project site.

Project Site 1
Project Site 1 proposes to subdivide approximately 7.2-acres for construction of 29 single-family residential homes. The proposed project site is bordered by the Modesto Irrigation District (M.I.D.) Main Canal to the north and single-family residential to the south, east, and west. Access to the proposed project site would be provided by connecting to the existing Quicksilver Street and Goldmine Avenue.

Project Site 2
Project Site 2 proposes to subdivide approximately 4.8-acres for construction of 28 single-family residential homes. The proposed project site is bordered by the Lower M.I.D. Canal to the north and single-family residential to the south, east, and west. Access to the proposed project site would be provided by extending the existing Enid Drive west to connect to Tim Bell Road.

Project Site 3
Project Site 3 proposes to subdivide approximately 8-acres for construction of 54 single-family residential homes. The proposed project site is bordered by the M.I.D. Main Canal to the north and east, the Lower M.I.D. Canal to the south, and Tim Bell Road to the west. Access to the proposed project site would be provided by two new streets (“B” Street and “A” Way on Figure 2) connecting to Tim Bell Road.

POLICY BACKGROUND
SENATE BILL 743
Senate Bill (SB) 743 was signed into law in 2013 and changed the focus of transportation impact analysis for CEQA purposes. Instead of analyzing the impact of land use projects on drivers using metrics like delay and level of service (LOS), transportation impacts are now based on the effects of driving as measured using VMT. The specific changes are codified in Section 15064.3 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
3 | P a g e
generally, vehicle miles traveled is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. According to 15064.3(a), “Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2) (regarding roadway capacity), a project’s effect on automobile delay shall not constitute a significant environmental impact.” The provisions of 15064.3 have applied statewide since July 1, 2020. While the CEQA Guidelines do not contain detailed guidance for individual land uses, Section 1064.3(b)(1) recommends, “Projects that decrease vehicle miles traveled in the project area compared to existing conditions should be presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact.”
Although not required for CEQA, both VMT and LOS are reported in this report. VMT is used to identify the project’s potentially significant transportation impacts under CEQA. LOS results are reported to provide decision-makers and the public with a better understanding of the effects the proposed projects may have on the surrounding roadway network and the types of operational enhancements that could be considered to improve operations and safety. Presentation of LOS information also helps evaluate the project’s consistency with the City’s level of service performance targets.

VMT THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(b)(1) allows lead agencies the discretion to select their own thresholds and allow for differences in thresholds based on context. The City of Waterford has not adopted VMT impact thresholds for general use so a project-specific threshold was developed based on direction from City staff.

The City of Waterford has determined that a significant impact would occur if the proposed project’s homebased VMT per capita would exceed the existing Citywide average home-based VMT per capita.

Key factors in determining this threshold included a review of the General Plan expectations for VMT reduction, and the projects’ general consistency with the City’s General Plan Land Use Element, Housing Element, and Urban Expansion Element. The General Plan Transportation and Circulation Chapter does not include a specific vehicle reduction target, however, it includes “Goal Area T-3: Vehicle Trip Reduction” which contains the following relevant goals, policies, and implementation measures that generally support reducing vehicle trips:

GOALS
• Living environments which encourage people to use a variety of transportation alternatives • A compact urban design for new growth areas
• Self-sustaining, mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly urban centers RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
4 | P a g e

POLICIES
• 3.1 – Create land use patterns that will encourage people to walk, bicycle, or use public transit for an increased number of their daily trips.
• 3.2 – Encourage in-fill development and compact urban form. • 3.3 – Promote site designs that encourage walking, cycling, and transit use. • 3.4 – Locate and design new commercial developments to provide good access from adjacent neighborhoods and reduce congestion on major streets.

IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
• 3.1.C – Plan areas for higher density development within ¼ mile of Waterford’s “Downtown” and other locations identified as transit hubs and commercial centers • 3.1.D – Encourage high housing densities in areas served by the full range of urban services. • 3.2.A – Encourage in-fill of vacant parcels.

The City of Waterford’s Housing Element (adopted in July 2018) includes a vacant site inventory list which identifies vacant or underutilized sites that may be appropriate for housing. Table 40 in the Housing Element identifies the site, acreage, zoning, anticipated realistic capacity, and anticipated income category, among many other things. It is important to note the realistic capacity is based on generic calculations that factor in the net acreage, gross acreage, anticipated right-of-way necessary for streets and public utility easements, etc. It is merely intended to provide estimates on where and how much development may occur but is not indicative of a minimum or maximum density allowed. The identified income category is strategically chosen to assist the City in complying with the State’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation numbers and is intended to help guide development in a way that provides the necessary type and mix of housing for the City of Waterford, as deemed appropriate by the State and Stanislaus County.

Table 1 displays the project’s consistency with anticipated development identified in the Housing Element Vacant Site Inventory List. The proposed projects are considered consistent if the proposed density is greater than or equal to the realistic capacity (as this ensures the proposed project is providing at least as many units as anticipated) and envisioned income category.

TABLE 1: HOUSING ELEMENT VACANT SITE INVENTORY CONSISTENCY CHECK Site
Housing
Element Site No.

Realistic
Capacity
Income
Category1
Proposed
Units
Proposed
Income Category
Project is
Consistent?
1 V38/V392 27 AM/M 29 AM/M Yes
2 V35 18 AM/M 28 AM/M Yes
RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
5 | P a g e
TABLE 1: HOUSING ELEMENT VACANT SITE INVENTORY CONSISTENCY CHECK Site
Housing
Element Site No.

Realistic
Capacity
Income
Category1
Proposed
Units
Proposed
Income Category
Project is
Consistent?
3 V27 30 AM/M 54 AM/M Yes
Notes:
1 AM = Above Moderate, M = Moderate
2 Site 1 consists of two separate parcels and therefore, is listed as two separate sties.

Additionally, the Urban Expansion Element describes the strategic growth plan for the City and includes various goals, policies, and implementation measures aimed at limiting leap-frog development, promoting in-fill development, and requiring new development be contiguous to existing urban areas and have reasonable access to public services and facilities. Minimizing urban sprawl and leap-frogging development is consistent with the overarching goal of SB 743 which is to reduce vehicle miles traveled (and ultimately greenhouse gas emissions) by encouraging infill development and focusing new housing development near existing services.

The City’s land use plan and growth plan was strategically designed to allow the City to increase its housing supply (which is consistent with multiple state goals and policies) while minimizing impacts on city services and ensuring development is contiguous, while also protecting and preserving the existing local community and prime agricultural land. Although adoption of the City’s General Plan predates VMT and SB 743, the growth plan is consistent with the overarching goal of SB 743 and statewide goals for increasing the housing supply as it allows for the addition of housing units but ensures those units are strategically placed to minimize negative impacts to the environment, city services, and the local community. For these various reasons, if the proposed projects’ home-based VMT per capita would be less than or equal to the existing Citywide average home-based VMT per capita, the project would be deemed to have a less-than-significant transportation impact.

COVID-19
Transportation and mobility are being transformed through several forces ranging from new technologies, different personal preferences, and the unique effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the combination of which could alter traditional travel demand relationships in the near- and long-term future.

Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent actions by federal, state, and local governments to curtail mobility and encourage physical distancing (i.e., limit in-person economic and social interactions) RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
6 | P a g e
temporarily but profoundly changed travel conditions. While travel activity is returning to more normal (i.e., pre-pandemic) conditions, it is possible that some of these temporary changes will influence people’s travel choices into the future, including either accelerating or diminishing some of the emerging trends in transportation that were already underway prior to the pandemic.

While the traffic data used for the transportation analysis was collected in 2023, post the COVID-19 pandemic, it is noted as a potential limitation nonetheless.

PERFORMANCE TARGETS
The proposed project sites are located in the City of Waterford. The City’s General Plan indicates the preferred level of service (LOS) target is LOS D; however, the General Plan recognizes that maintaining LOS D at existing intersections is not always feasible, appropriate, or necessary and indicates that necessary improvements to improve LOS (such as roadway widening) may not always be appropriate and greater delay may be acceptable.

Caltrans owns and operates Yosemite Boulevard (also known as SR 132). Per the Transportation Concept Report (TCR) for Yosemite Boulevard/SR 132, the performance target for the highway in the City is LOS D.

STUDY AREA AND PERIODS
Intersection operations were evaluated during the weekday AM and PM peak hour conditions at the following intersections:
1) Tim Bell Road/Bonnie Brae Avenue
2) Tim Bell Road/Bentley Street
3) Tim Bell Road/Welch Street
4) Tim Bell Road/Yosemite Boulevard
5) Tweed Street/Oakdale-Waterford Highway
6) Tim Bell Road/Enid Drive (future intersection)
7) Tim Bell Road/B Street (future intersection)
8) Tim Bell Road/A Way (future intersection)
The operations analysis was completed for the following scenarios:
• Existing Conditions – represents conditions in 2023.
• Existing Plus Project 1 Conditions – analyzes the study intersections with the addition of project trips generated by Site 1.

RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
7 | P a g e
• Existing Plus Project Site 2 Conditions – analyzes the study intersections with the addition of project trips generated by Site 2.
• Existing Plus Project Site 3 Conditions – analyzes the study intersections with the addition of project trips generated by Site 3.
• Existing Plus All Projects Conditions – analyzes the study intersections with the addition of project trips generated by Site 1, 2, and 3.

RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
8 | P a g e
II. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
This section describes the existing transportation network, including roadways, and bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities, within the study area. Given the close proximity of the proposed project sites, the transportation system and nearby facilities are the same for each project and are described for the study area as a whole (rather than for each individual project).

EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM
The primary roadways in the study area are described below:
• Tim Bell Road is a two lane north-south collector that provides access between Yosemite Boulevard/SR 132 and residential homes to the north. In the study area, it has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour (mph). Notably, Tim Bell Road also connects to El Pomar Avenue to the north which is often used to access the Oakdale-Waterford Highway. • Bonnie Brae Avenue is a two lane east-west collector that provides access between Tim Bell Road and the Oakdale-Waterford Highway. Bonnie Brae Avenue has a posted speed limit of 25 mph.
• Bentley Street is a two lane east-west collector that provides access between Yosemite Avenue/SR 132 and the commercial developments and Waterford Middle School on Bentley Street, as well as the residential homes west of Tim Bell Road. Bentley Street has a posted speed limit of 25 mph.
• Yosemite Boulevard is a two lane east-west arterial that provides a regional connection between Coulterville and communities/destinations to the east (including Yosemite National Park) and Modesto and ultimately I-580 to the west. Yosemite Boulevard is a Caltrans owned and operated facility and in the study area, it has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. • Oakdale-Waterford Highway is a two lane north-south arterial that provides access between the City of Waterford and the City of Oakdale. Oakdale-Waterford Highway also provides connection to other arterial and collector streets north of Waterford that provide access to Modesto and SR 99. Although referred to as a “highway”, Oakdale-Waterford Highway is not a Caltrans facility and it is owned and operated by the City of Waterford in the City limits and Stanislaus County in the Unincorporated County area. In the study area, Oakdale-Waterford Highway has a posted speed limit of 45 mph.

EXISTING BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM
The existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities adjacent to the proposed project sites are described below:

RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
9 | P a g e
Tim Bell Road
Tim Bell Road is classified and signed as a Class III Bike Route; however, there is limited signage and no striping. The Stanislaus County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan (2021) classifies Tim Bell Road between Bonnie Brae Avenue and Baker Street as a high stress bicycle facility.

Monolithic sidewalks are present along both sides of Tim Bell Road between Welch Street and Main Street but a sidewalk gap exists between Main Street and Bonnie Brae Avenue and between C Street and Yosemite Boulevard. Between Welch Street and C Street, sidewalks are generally only present on the east side of the road. Sidewalks are present along the side streets adjacent to Tim Bell Road including Welch Street, Sunflower Drive, Heather Drive, Bentley Street, and Main Street. High visibility crosswalks are present on all legs of the Tim Bell Road/Bentley Road and Tim Bell Road/Welch Street intersections. A crosswalk is present on the west side of the Tim Bell Road/Main Street intersection.

Bonnie Brae Avenue
Bonnie Brae Avenue is classified and signed as a Class III Bike Route and sidewalks are present on the north side between Oakdale-Waterford Highway and approximately 175-feet east of Ranchwood Court. However, a sidewalk gap is present between Ranchwood Court and Tim Bell Road. The Lower M.I.D. Canal borders Bonnie Brae Avenue to the south and although it includes approximately 20 feet of flat, graded area between the roadway and the canal which could be used by pedestrians, it is signed to indicate trespassing and loitering is prohibit by law.

Additional Facilities Relevant to the Proposed Projects There are no bicycle or pedestrian facilities on Yosemite Boulevard near the Yosemite Boulevard/Tim Bell Road intersection nor within 1,000 feet east or west of the intersection. Within the City limits, sidewalks are generally present along the Oakdale-Waterford Highway; however, a gap is present on the east side between Bonnie Brae Avenue and 1
st Street. Within the City limits, Oakdale-Waterford Highway is classified, signed, and striped as a Class II Bike Lane; however, the striping is severely deteriorated and difficult to see.

EXISTING TRANSIT SYSTEM
Stanislaus Regional Transit Authority (StanRTA) provides bus service throughout Stanislaus County. Route 50 serves the Waterford area and provides a connection between the Modesto Transit Center and the City of Waterford. The bus stop closest to the proposed project sites is located at E Street and Bentley Avenue and is approximately one mile from Project Site 1 and a half-mile from Project Sites 2 and 3. Service is provided in one-hour intervals between 5:45 AM and 8:15 PM during weekdays, between 7:45 AM and 7:15 PM on Saturdays, and between 7:45 AM and 6:15 PM on Sundays.

RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
10 | P a g e
III. CEQA COMPLIANCE
This section evaluates the proposed project’s transportation system (VMT), bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and safety impacts.

EVALUATION OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IMPACTS (VMT)
A proposed project would result in a significant transportation impact if it would conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3, subdivision (b)(1), which states for land use projects, “Vehicle miles traveled exceeding an applicable threshold of significance may indicate a significant impact.” As previously noted, the City of Waterford has determined that the proposed project would result in a significant transportation impact if the home-based VMT per capita exceeds the existing Citywide average home-based VMT per capita.

Fehr & Peers’ VMT+ tool was used to determine the Citywide average home-based VMT per capita and estimate project home-based VMT per capita. VMT+ utilizes a custom data set from StreetLight Data, which is based on anonymized locational records, passively collected from smart phones and connected vehicles, and it provides home-based VMT per resident and home-based VMT per worker estimates in California, down to the census block group (BG). Data from 2022 was used for this analysis.

The home-based VMT per resident estimates include all homebased automobile vehicle trips, which are traced back to the residence of the trip-maker (see Image 1); non-home-based trips (i.e. from the grocery store to the coffee shop) and commercial vehicle trips (trucks) are excluded.

There are four BGs within the City of Waterford.

Image 1: Home-Based VMT Graphic
Source: Fehr & Peers
RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
11 | P a g e
TABLE 2: AVERAGE CITYWIDE HOME-BASED VMT PER CAPITA
Census Block Group Home-Based VMT Per Capita
60990028011 29.28
60990028012 26.18
60990028021 33.12
60990028022 24.78
Average Citywide 28.34
Notes:

Home-based VMT per capita derived from 2022 Streetlight Data.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2023
As displayed, the Citywide average home-based VMT per capita is 28.34.

Project Site 1 is in BG 60990028012 and Project Site’s 2 and 3 are in BG 60990028011. The average homebased VMT per capita for these two BGs were used to evaluate project VMT. The three proposed project sites are close in proximity and are similar developments (i.e. all low-density, single-family homes with similar lot sizes) so the average home-based VMT per capita is anticipated to be similar for all three projects and one average home-based VMT per capita was calculated for the proposed projects. When feasible, it is desirable to have as many data points as possible when estimating project VMT and because BG 60990028011 and BG 60990028012 are so close and are similar in terms of land use (described in greater detail below), the average home-based VMT per resident of both BGs was used to estimate project home-based VMT per capita.

The following criteria were used to determine if the existing BGs were appropriate to use to estimate project home-based VMT per capita for each of the projects:
1) Land use characteristics: Almost all homes located in the BGs are single-family homes. These homes are similar in size and development type when compared to the proposed project (i.e. a BG with primarily high-density multi-family development would not be appropriate to use to estimate VMT for a low-density single-family home development).
2) Location of BGs compared to location of the proposed projects: Project Site 1 is located in BG 60990028012 and Project Site’s 2 and 3 are located in BG 60990028011. Given that the proposed project sites are located within the BGs and the BGs are directly adjacent to each other with many shared access roads (such as Oakdale-Waterford Highway, Yosemite Road/SR 132, Tim Bell Road, Bentley Street, and Welch Street), it can be concluded that there are no geographical or circulation RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
12 | P a g e
differences that would result in a significantly different VMT per capita (i.e., a BG in a different part of the city with a very different circulation network and access locations may not be as reasonable of a proxy).
3) Age of housing: The age of housing stock can impact the demographics (and trip making characteristics) of a community. With the exception of the River Pointe development and newer single-family homes along Selby Way, most homes in the BGs are more than 20 years old. While this is a limitation, these two BGs still serve as the most reasonable proxy for the proposed projects and do include VMT generated by most of the new single-family homes constructed in Waterford.

The primary exception to this is the newest subdivision located between Kadota Avenue and Pecan Avenue, approximately one-mile from the proposed project sites.

For these reasons, the existing BGs were determined to be generally representative of the proposed projects and it is anticipated that future residents of the proposed projects would have similar trip making characteristics as the existing residents in these BGs and produce similar home-based VMT per capita.

Based on this data, the proposed projects are estimated to generate an average home-based VMT per capita of 27.73, which is lower than the Citywide average home-based VMT per capita of 28.34. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less than significant transportation impact.

EVALUATION OF BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND TRANSIT IMPACTS
A proposed project would result in a significant bicycle, pedestrian, or transit impact if it would disrupt or interfere with any existing or planned, bicycle, pedestrian, or transit facilities, or if the proposed project would result in a physical change that would be inconsistent with policies in the City of Waterford General Plan.

PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
The proposed projects would construct sidewalks along all interior streets and project frontages consistent with the City of Waterford requirements. For Project Site 1, this would result in contiguous sidewalks between the project site and Oakdale-Waterford Highway along Goldmine Avenue and Quicksilver Street.

A contiguous connection to Bonnie Brae Avenue would also be provided via the existing sidewalks on Bronze Lane and Cinnibar Way.

For Project Site 2, a contiguous sidewalk would be provided on Enid Drive between Tim Bell Road and Tisdell Drive, which ultimately connects to Bentley Street. Sidewalks would also be constructed on Tim Bell Road along the project frontage and along the Lower M.I.D Canal to the north. It is noted that an approximately 195-foot gap in the pedestrian network would exist on Tim Bell Road south of the project frontage. The existing sidewalk on the east side of Tim Bell Road terminates just north of Main Street. Given that the RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
13 | P a g e
proposed project does not have control of this parcel, this gap would be present post-construction of the project until the adjacent parcel redevelops or the City of Waterford closes the gap.

For Project Site 3, contiguous sidewalks along internal streets would provide a connection to Tim Bell Road, which would connect to the sidewalks being constructed to the south with Project Site 2. Together with Project Site 2, approximately 545 feet of sidewalks would be constructed along the eastern side of Tim Bell Road. However, if Project Site 2 is not approved but Project Site 3 is, an approximately 410-foot gap in the pedestrian network would exist between the project site and the existing sidewalk just north of Main Street.

The proposed projects would include sidewalks, curb, gutter, and lighting consistent with the City’s General Plan, Municipal Code and Improvement Standards and the proposed projects would not disrupt or interfere with any existing or planned pedestrian improvements nor would they result in a physical change that is inconsistent with any policies in the City of Waterford General Plan. Therefore, the proposed projects would result in a less than significant pedestrian impact.

BICYCLE FACILITIES
The only existing bicycle facilities directly adjacent to the project site are on Tim Bell Road and Bonnie Brae Avenue, which are both classified and signed as a Class III Bike Route. The proposed projects would not disrupt or interfere with the existing facilities and would not result in any physical change that is inconsistent with policies in the City of Waterford General Plan. Therefore, the proposed projects would result in a less than significant bicycle impact.

TRANSIT FACILITIES
As previously mentioned, the City of Waterford does not operate their own internal public transit service but Stanislaus Regional Transit Authority (StanRTA) provides bus service throughout Stanislaus County.

Route 50 serves the Waterford area and provides a connection between the Modesto Transit Center and the City of Waterford. The bus stop closest to the project sites is located at E Street and Bentley Avenue and is approximately one mile from Project Site 1 and a half-mile from Project Sites 2 and 3. The proposed projects would not disrupt or interfere with these existing facilities. The City of Waterford General Plan nor Stanislaus County Draft Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Unmet Transit Needs Analysis Report identify any planned or necessary transit improvements near the study area and the project is not inconsistent with transit related goals or policies in the General Plan. Therefore, the proposed projects would result in a less than significant transit impact.

RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
14 | P a g e

EVALUATION OF SAFETY IMPACTS
A proposed project would result in a significant impact if it would be inconsistent with an applicable design standard.

The proposed projects would create new intersections and roadways which would be designed to comply with City of Waterford Improvement Standards (2013) and the City of Waterford Municipal Code. City improvement standards and the Municipal Code include design criteria to ensure residential subdivisions are designed to meet or exceed uniform levels of sound engineering practices. The design criteria address speed, sight distance and clear zones, roadway grade, curve radius, intersection spacing and lighting and more. Applicable to Project Sites 2 and 3, Section 16.03.110 of the City of Waterford Municipal Code requires that when local street intersections are off-set, the off-set must be a minimum 100 feet centerline to centerline. Bonnie Brae Avenue and Tim Bell Road are classified as collector streets, however, the City of Waterford has not established a minimum off-set necessary for collectors. Due to a posted speed limit of 25 mph, low volumes on Bonnie Brae Avenue and anticipated low volumes on the proposed projects sidestreets (including Enid Way, B Street and A Way), the City of Waterford has confirmed the proposed intersection spacing for Project Sites 2 and 3 is acceptable.

Intersection signing and striping would be designed to meet applicable industry standards from the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) and The American Associations of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets.

Each development application would be subject to review and approval by the City, including the Fire Department, which would include a review of the projects’ consistency with City design criteria to ensure safe vehicle access is provided, including for emergency vehicles. Specifically, Section 16.03.120 of the Municipal Code requires each tentative tract or parcel map provide at least two different routes for ingress and egress. All three proposed projects have two access routes. Therefore, implementation of the proposed projects would not be inconsistent with an applicable design standard and the proposed projects would result in a less than significant impact.

RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
15 | P a g e
IV. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
This section describes the methodology and inputs used for the traffic operations analysis.

INTERSECTION OPERATIONS
The study intersections were analyzed using procedures and methodologies contained in the Highway Capacity Manual – 7
th Edition (Transportation Research Board, 2022). These methodologies were applied using Synchro 11 software, which considers traffic volumes, lane configurations, signal timings, signal coordination and other pertinent parameters of intersection operations.

The following describes specific inputs, model parameters, and other aspects of the Synchro modeling, based on data collection efforts.
• Peak hour volumes collected at the study intersections on December 21, 2023 were used for the analysis. Local schools were in session and weather conditions were clear when the data was collected; however, it is noted that, Tim Bell Road near the M.I.D. Main Canal was closed due to construction activity. Streetlight Data collected between March and May 2023 was used to evaluate average roadway volumes on Tim Bell Road without construction. The count data collected on December 21, 2023 was then adjusted to more closely reflect through volumes on Tim Bell Road.
• Existing roadway geometrics and intersection lane configurations. • The peak hour factor (PHF) observed at each intersection during the AM and PM peak hours was used. The PHF, which is a measure of peaking (lower values represent more peaking) during the busiest 15-minutes of the hour, ranges from 0.79 to 0.89 during the AM peak hour and 0.89 to

0.95 during the PM peak hour. The lower PHF during the AM peak hour occurs at intersections near the middle school and is due to school starting at 8:00 AM. • Heavy vehicles are prohibited on Tim Bell Road so the heavy vehicle percentage used was zero.

Observed heavy vehicle percentages were used for through movements on Yosemite Boulevard and the Oakdale-Waterford Highway.
• Observed bicycle and pedestrian volumes were used.

LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITION
Each study intersection was analyzed using the concept of Level of Service (LOS). LOS is a quantitative measure of traffic operating conditions whereby a letter grade from A (the best) to F (the worst) is assigned.

RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
16 | P a g e
In general, LOS A represents free-flow conditions with no congestion and LOS F represents severe congestion and delay under stop-and-go conditions.

A LOS grade is assigned to each intersection based on the methodologies contained in the Highway Capacity Manual 7
th Edition (HCM), Transportation Research Board, 2022. The HCM methodology determines the LOS at all-way stop controlled intersections by comparing the weighted average control delay per vehicle at the intersection. At side-street stop-controlled intersections, LOS is calculated for each movement in addition to the intersection as a whole. Table 3 presents delay ranges for each LOS for stopcontrolled intersections.

TABLE 3: LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS FOR STUDY INTERSECTIONS Level of Service
Average Control Delay
(seconds/vehicle)
Unsignalized
A  10
B > 10 to 15
C > 15 to 25
D > 25 to 35
E > 35 to 50
F > 50
Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2022

INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE TARGETS
As previously mentioned, all study intersections have an established performance target of LOS D.

PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
Project trips were estimated using trip rates published in the Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021). Table 4 displays the estimated number of daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour vehicle trips for each proposed project.

RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
17 | P a g e
TABLE 4: PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
Project Site Quantity
(DU)
Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Total In Out Total In Out Total
1 29 323 6 18 24 20 11 31
2 28 313 6 17 23 19 11 30
3 54 572 11 32 43 35 21 56
All 111 1,208 23 67 90 74 43 117
Notes:

Trip generation estimate is based on trip rates published in the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021) for detached single-family units (ITE Code 210). The fitted curve equation was used.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2023

PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
Project trips were distributed based on existing travel patterns, the location of schools and commercial land uses in the City of Waterford, and output from the US Census On-the-Map database. Work locations for City of Waterford residents were used to determine typical daily commute patterns which were then used to inform trip distribution. Figures 3, 4, and 5 display trip distribution for each project. Overall distribution is the same for each project, however, assignment to City streets varies due to the specific location of each project and anticipated travel patterns.

RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
18 | P a g e
V. INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
This section presents the results of the peak hour intersection operations analysis under the following scenarios:
• Existing
• Existing Plus Project Site 1
• Existing Plus Project Site 2
• Existing Plus Project Site 3
• Existing Plus All Project Sites
Peak hour turning movements and lane configurations are provided in Appendix A. Technical information for all scenarios are provided in Appendix B.

INTERSECTION OPERATIONS
Intersection operations were analyzed following the analysis methodologies presented in Section IV.

For existing plus project conditions, project trips for each individual project were added to existing traffic counts based on the trip generation and distribution previously described. For existing plus all project sites, trips associated with all three development projects were added to existing volumes. Table 5 displays the AM and PM peak hour operations at the study intersections under all scenarios.

RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
19 | P a g e
TABLE 5: INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
Intersection Control
Type
Peak
Hour
Existing Existing Plus
Project 1
Existing Plus
Project 2
Existing Plus
Project 3
Existing Plus All
Projects
Delay1 LOS Delay1 LOS Delay1 LOS Delay1 LOS Delay1 LOS

1. Tim Bell Rd/ Bonnie Brae
Ave SSSC AMPM
1 (9)
2 (9)
A (A)
A (A)
1 (9)
2 (9)
A (A)
A (A)
1 (9)
3 (9)
A (A)
A (A)
1 (9)
2 (10)
A (A)
A (A)
1 (9)
3 (10)
A (A)
A (A)

2. Tim Bell Rd/ Bentley St AWSC AM
PM
8 8
A
A
8 8
A
A
8 8
A
A
8 8
A
A
8 8
A
A

3. Tim Bell Rd/Welch St AWSC AM
PM
8 8
A
A
8 8
A
A
8 8
A
A
8 8
A
A
8 8
A
A

4. Tim Bell Rd/ Yosemite
Blvd SSSC AMPM
3 (16)
3 (20)
A (C)
A (C)
3 (16)
3 (20)
A (C)
A (C)
3 (16)
3 (21)
A (C)
A (C)
3 (17)
3 (21)
A (C)
A (C)
3 (17)
3 (22)
A (C)
A (C)

5. Oakdale Waterford
Highway/Tweed St SSSC AMPM
2 (11)
2 (13)
A (B)
A (B)
2 (11)
2 (13)
A (B)
A (B)
2 (11)
2 (14)
A (B)
A (B)
2 (11)
2 (14)
A (B)
A (B)
2 (11)
2 (13)
A (B)
A (B)

6. Tim Bell Rd/Enid Dr SSSC AM
PM N/A N/A 1 (9)1 (9)
A (A)
A (A) N/A 1 (9)1 (9)
A (A)
A (A)

7. Tim Bell Rd/”B” St SSSC AM
PM N/A N/A N/A 1 (10)1 (10)
A (A)
A (A)
1 (10)
1 (10)
A (A)
A (A)

8. Tim Bell Rd/”A” Way SSSC AM
PM N/A N/A N/A 1 (10)1 (9)
A (A)
A (A)
1 (10)
1 (10)
A (A)
A (A)
Notes:

SSSC = Side-Street Stop Control; AWSC = All-Way Stop Control; LOS = Level of Service 1 For all-way stop-controlled intersections, average intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle for all approaches. For side-street stop-controlled intersections, intersection delay is reported seconds per vehicle for the overall intersection and (worst-case) movement. Intersection delay is calculated based on the procedures and methodology contained in the Highway Capacity Manual 7 th Edition (Transportation Research, 2022).

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024
RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
20 | P a g e
As displayed, all intersections would operate acceptably at LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours under all study scenarios. Under the existing plus all projects scenario, there would be a total addition of 90 trips during the AM peak hour and 117 trips during the PM peak hour, resulting in no or minimal increase in delay at the study intersections. Therefore, no intersection improvements are necessary.

It is noted that the General Plan indicates that at some point in the future, a two-way left turn lane on Tim Bell Road between Yosemite Boulevard and El Pomar Avenue may be necessary. This is heavily dependent upon development occurring to the north in the City’s Urban Growth Boundary and Sphere of Influence.

This improvement is not necessary with the proposed projects and it is unknown if or when development north of the City of Waterford may occur. However, the City may wish to preserve necessary right-of-way for this future improvement if a two-way left turn lane will ultimately be constructed on Tim Bell Road.

RES 2024-42
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Beard Park
La Gallina Ave
C
St
B St
Dorsey St
Enid Dr
Bonnie Brae Ave
Goldmine Ave
Borax Ct
Ranch
wood Ct
D St
Summers St
Main St
A St
Chaffee Ln
Harriett Dr
Bronze Ln
Tim Bell Rd
Quicksilver St
Tisdell Dr
Oden Dr
Vineyard Rd
\\fpgisdevApp01\DevGISLibrary\ServiceMXDs\WC\WC234051_Waterford_Residential\WC234051_Waterford_Residential.aprx Project Location
Project Sites
Parks
Figure 1
RES 2024-42
Beard Park
Tim Bell Rd
Main
St
Bonnie Brae Ave
Enid Dr
Tisdell Dr
Ranchwood
Ct
Quicksilver St
Goldmine Ave
Vineyard Rd
\\fpgisdevApp01\DevGISLibrary\ServiceMXDs\WC\WC234051_Waterford_Residential\WC234051_Waterford_Residential.aprx Site Access
Parks
Canals
Figure 2
RES 2024-42
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
dR lleB miT
Bentley St
Dorsey St
La Gallina Ave
Pecan Ave
B St
F St
C St
D St
Kadota Ave
Bonnie Brae Ave
evA nretseW
Yosemite Blvd
A St
E St
Welch St
Quicksilver St
rD lledsiT
Reinway Ave
Washburn Ave
Hernandez Ave
Oakdale Waterford Hwy
Vineyard Rd
Bentley St
Yosemite Blvd
\\fpgisdevApp01\DevGISLibrary\ServiceMXDs\WC\WC234051_Waterford_Residential\WC234051_Waterford_Residential.aprx Trip DistributionSite 1
AM(PM) Trip Distribution Percentages
Figure 3
5%(0%)
73%(45%)
21%(44%)
0%(10%)
1%(1%)
XX%(XX%)
RES 2024-42
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
dR lleB miT
Bentley St
Dorsey St
La Gallina Ave
Pecan Ave
B St
F St
C St
D St
Kadota Ave
Bonnie Brae Ave
evA nretseW
Yosemite Blvd
A St
E St
Welch St
Quicksilver St
rD lledsiT
Reinway Ave
Washburn Ave
Hernandez Ave
Oakdale Waterford Hwy
Vineyard Rd
Bentley St
Yosemite Blvd
\\fpgisdevApp01\DevGISLibrary\ServiceMXDs\WC\WC234051_Waterford_Residential\WC234051_Waterford_Residential.aprx Trip DistributionSite 2
AM(PM) Trip Distribution Percentages
Figure 4
11%(22%)
5%(0%)
36%(20%)
10%(22%)
37%(35%)
1%(1%)
XX%(XX%)
RES 2024-42
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
dR lleB miT
Bentley St
Dorsey St
La Gallina Ave
Pecan Ave
B St
F St
C St
D St
Kadota Ave
Bonnie Brae Ave
evA nretseW
Yosemite Blvd
A St
E St
Welch St
Quicksilver St
rD lledsiT
Reinway Ave
Washburn Ave
Hernandez Ave
Oakdale Waterford Hwy
Vineyard Rd
Bentley St
Yosemite Blvd
\\fpgisdevApp01\DevGISLibrary\ServiceMXDs\WC\WC234051_Waterford_Residential\WC234051_Waterford_Residential.aprx Trip DistributionSite 3
AM(PM) Trip Distribution Percentages
Figure 5
5%(0%)
36%(20%)
5%(11%)
37%(35%)
1%(1%)
XX%(XX%)
16%(33%)
RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
26 | P a g e
APPENDIX A: VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing AM
Bonnie Brae Ave
1594
2 10
75 5
12 3411
Bentley St
17 13
5 Bentley St
17 7
32 Tim Bell Rd
1563
11 1
2 20
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing AM
Bentley S
0 38
12 Welch St
9 7
0 21
26 8 1
1384
4 2
0 38
129
6 Yosemite Blvd
0 319
11Tim Bell Rd
0 7
98 3
4 9 10
12 13
16 20
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing AM
9 187
4 Tweed 5
0 8
18 0
15 Oakdale Waterford Highway
11 2
8 0
5 14
17 18
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing PM
Bonnie Brae Ave
2882
9 25
1180
11 5817
Bentley St
23 36
22 Bentley St
5 32
26 Tim Bell Rd
1437
21 1
2 20
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing PM
Bentley S
4 78
44 Welch St
1 0
2 34
251716
45 22
5 11
0 0
9 0
2 9
0 1
4 Yosemite Blvd 0
228
32Tim Bell Rd
19 1
59 34
9 10
12 13
16 20
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing PM
15 180
22 Tweed 3
1 21
17 1
8 Oakdale Waterford Highway
2 30
4 0
2 5
14 17
18 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 1 AM
Fehr & Peers
Bonnie Brae Ave
1694
2 11
75 5
12 3411
Bentley St
18 13
5 Bentley St
17 7
32 Tim Bell Rd
1663
11 1
2 8
20 22
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 1 AM
Fehr & Peers
0 38
12 Welch St 9
7 0
21 26
8 1
1384
4 2
0 38
129
6 Yosemite Blvd
0 319
11Tim Bell Rd
0 7
98 3
4 9 10
12 13
16 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 1 AM
Fehr & Peers
9 187
6 Tweed 5
0 8
24 0
19 Oakdale Waterford Highway
11 3
8 0
5 17
18 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 1 PM
Fehr & Peers
Bonnie Brae Ave
3082
9 2611
80 11
6017
Bentley St
23 36
22 Bentley St
5 32
26 Tim Bell Rd
1438
21 1
2 8
20 22
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 1 PM
Fehr & Peers
4 80
44 Welch St 10
23 4
25 17
16 46
22 5
11 0
0 92
290
14 Yosemite Blvd
0 228
32Tim Bell Rd
19 1
60 3
4 9 10
12 13
16 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 1 PM
Fehr & Peers
15 180
26 Tweed 3
1 21
19 1
13 Oakdale Waterford Highway 3
30 3
0 2
5 17
18 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 2 AM
Fehr & Peers
Bonnie Brae Ave
2396
2 13
7 5
6 123611
Bentley St
17 13
5 Bentley St
17 7
32 16
6911
Tim Bell Rd 1092
Enid Dr
7 10 4
85 1
2 6
20 24
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 2 AM
Fehr & Peers
0 40
12 Welch St
9 7
0 21
26 8 1
1390
4 2
0 40
129
6 Yosemite Blvd
0 319
11Tim Bell Rd
0 7
104
3 4
9 10
2 13
16 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 2 AM
Fehr & Peers
9 189
4 Tweed
5 0
8 18
0 15
Oakdale Waterford Highway
11 2
9 0
5 17
18 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 2 PM
Fehr & Peers
Bonnie Brae Ave
3384
9 33
84 11
116517
Bentley St
23 36
22 Bentley St
5 32
26 14
4121
Tim Bell Rd 1107
Enid Dr
4 7
12 105
1 2
6 20
24 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 2 PM
Fehr & Peers
4 85
44 Welch St
10 23
4 25
17 16
49 22
5 11
0 0
97 290
14 Yosemite Blvd
0 228
32Tim Bell Rd
19 1
63 3
4 9 10
2 13
16 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 2 PM
Fehr & Peers
15 182
22 Tweed
3 1
21 17
1 8
Oakdale Waterford Highway
2 30
4 4
2 5
17 18
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 3 AM
Fehr & Peers
15 99
Bonnie Brae Ave 6
10 8
9 18
123811
Bentley St
18 13
5 Bentley St
17 7
32 Tim Bell Rd
1775
11 10
0 5
"B" St
16 3 1
91 99
4 "A" Way
11 2 1
81 1
2 7
8 20
22 26
27 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 3 AM
Fehr & Peers
0 42
12 Welch St
9 7
0 21
26 8 1
1396
4 2
0 42
129
6 Yosemite Blvd
0 319
11Tim Bell Rd
0 7
110
3 4
9 10
13 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 3 AM
Fehr & Peers
9 189
4 Tweed
5 0
8 18
0 15
Oakdale Waterford Highway
119
2 0
5 14
17 18
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 3 PM
Fehr & Peers
28 94
Bonnie Brae Ave 20
25 8
7 18
117017
Bentley St
23 36
22 Bentley St
5 32
26 Tim Bell Rd
1444
21 9
8 14
"B" St
8 4 7
97 93
9 "A" Way
6 3 5
9 8
1 2
7 8
20 22
26 27
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 3 PM
Fehr & Peers
4 90
44 Welch St
10 23
4 25
17 16
52 22
5 11
0 0
102
290
14 Yosemite Blvd
0 228
32Tim Bell Rd
19 1
66 3
4 9 10
13 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + Site 3 PM
Fehr & Peers
15 182
22 Tweed
3 1
21 17
1 8
Oakdale Waterford Highway
3 24
04 2
5 14
17 18
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + All Sites AM
Fehr & Peers
24 101
Bonnie Brae Ave 6
14 9
0 18
12 4011
Bentley St
19 13
5 Bentley St
17 7
32 19
8111
Tim Bell Rd 1152
Enid Dr
7 10 4
100
10 2
5 "B" St
16 3 1
92 1014
"A" Way
11 2 1
8 2
1 2
6 7
8 20
24 26
27 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + All Sites AM
Fehr & Peers
0 44
12 Welch St
9 7
0 21
26 8 1
102
13 4
2 0
44 129
6 Yosemite Blvd
0 319
11Tim Bell Rd
0 7
116
3 4
9 10
13 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + All Sites AM
Fehr & Peers
9 191
6 Tweed5
0 8
24 0
19 Oakdale Waterford Highway
120
3 0
5 14
17 18
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + All Sites PM
Fehr & Peers
3596
Bonnie Brae Ave 20
34 91
18 11
7917
Bentley St
23 36
22 Bentley St
5 32
26 14
4921
Tim Bell Rd 1247
Enid Dr
4 7
12 113
10 0 14
"B" St
8 4 7
101
95 9
"A" Way
6 3 5 10
2 1
2 6
7 8
20 24
26 27
RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + All Sites PM
Fehr & Peers
4 99
44 Welch St
10 23
4 25
17 16
5722
5 11
0 0
111
290
14 Yosemite Blvd
0 228
32Tim Bell Rd
19 1
71 3
4 9 10
13 RES 2024-42
Map - Waterford Waterford
Existing + All Sites PM
Fehr & Peers
15 184
26 Tweed3
1 21
19 1
13 Oakdale Waterford Highway
3 33
08 2
5 14
17 18
RES 2024-42
Waterford Residential Development Projects
Transportation Impact Analysis Report
February 15, 2024
27 | P a g e
APPENDIX B: TECHNICAL CALCULATIONS
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Tim Bell Rd & Bonnie Brae Ave Existing AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 10 15 94 75 5
Future Vol, veh/h 2 10 15 94 75 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 24004
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 2 11 17 106 84 6
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 231 93 94 0 - 0
Stage 1 91 -----
Stage 2 140 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 762 970 1513 - - -
Stage 1 938 -----
Stage 2 892 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 747 964 1507 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 747 -----
Stage 1 923 -----
Stage 2 888 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9 1 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1507 - 919 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 - 0.015 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
2: Tim Bell Rd & Bentley St Existing AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.6
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 13 5 17 7 32 12 34 11 11 63 15
Future Vol, veh/h 17 13 5 17 7 32 12 34 11 11 63 15
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Heavy Vehicles, % 000000000000
Mvmt Flow 22 16 6 22 9 41 15 43 14 14 80 19
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.4 7.6 7.8

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 21% 49% 30% 12%
Vol Thru, % 60% 37% 12% 71%
Vol Right, % 19% 14% 57% 17%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 57 35 56 89
LT Vol 12 17 17 11
Through Vol 34 13 7 63
RT Vol 11 5 32 15
Lane Flow Rate 72 44 71 113
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.082 0.054 0.08 0.128
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.112 4.389 4.071 4.078
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 858 821 885 867
Service Time 2.2 2.391 2.071 2.156
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.084 0.054 0.08 0.13
HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.6 7.4 7.8
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
3: Tim Bell Rd & Welch St Existing AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 7 0 21 26 8 0 38 12 1 84 13
Future Vol, veh/h 9 7 0 21 26 8 0 38 12 1 84 13
Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000000000
Mvmt Flow 12 9 0 27 33 10 0 49 15 1 108 17
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.7 7.4 7.8

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 56% 38% 1%
Vol Thru, % 76% 44% 47% 86%
Vol Right, % 24% 0% 15% 13%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 50 16 55 98
LT Vol 0 9 21 1
Through Vol 38 7 26 84
RT Vol 12 0 8 13
Lane Flow Rate 64 21 71 126
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.071 0.026 0.083 0.141
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.011 4.499 4.232 4.03
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 881 800 834 881
Service Time 2.092 2.499 2.322 2.097
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.073 0.026 0.085 0.143
HCM Control Delay 7.4 7.6 7.7 7.8
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.5
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Tim Bell Rd & Yosemite Blvd Existing AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 129 6 0 319 11 4 2 0 7 0 98
Future Vol, veh/h 38 129 6 0 319 11 4 2 0 7 0 98
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 01102001100
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 70070000000
Mvmt Flow 43 147 7 0 363 13 5 2 0 8 0 111
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 378 0 0 155 0 0 663 616 153 611 613 372 Stage 1 - - - - - - 238 238 - 372 372 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 425 378 - 239 241 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1192 - - 1438 - - 377 409 898 409 410 678 Stage 1 - - - - - - 770 712 - 653 622 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 611 619 - 769 710 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1190 - - 1437 - - 305 391 896 393 392 677 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 305 391 - 393 392 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 738 683 - 626 621 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 510 618 - 735 681 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 0 16.2 11.8

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 329 1190 - - 1437 - - 646
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 0.036 ----- 0.185
HCM Control Delay (s) 16.2 8.1 0 - 0 - - 11.8
HCM Lane LOS C A A - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.7
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Oakdale Waterford Highway & Tweed St Existing AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 0 8 18 0 15 9 187 4 2 118 0
Future Vol, veh/h 5 0 8 18 0 15 9 187 4 2 118 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 01101101101
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 200 - - 180 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000060060
Mvmt Flow 6 0 9 21 0 17 10 215 5 2 136 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 388 382 138 385 380 220 137 0 0 221 0 0 Stage 1 141 141 - 239 239 -------
Stage 2 247 241 - 146 141 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 574 554 916 577 556 825 1459 - - 1360 - - Stage 1 867 784 - 769 711 -------
Stage 2 761 710 - 861 784 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 557 548 914 567 550 823 1458 - - 1359 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 557 548 - 567 550 -------
Stage 1 860 782 - 763 705 -------
Stage 2 739 704 - 850 782 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10 10.8 0.3 0.1

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1458 - - 733 660 1359 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.02 0.057 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 - - 10 10.8 7.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Tim Bell Rd & Bonnie Brae Ave Existing PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 25 28 82 80 11
Future Vol, veh/h 9 25 28 82 80 11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 10 28 31 92 90 12
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 252 100 104 0 - 0
Stage 1 98 -----
Stage 2 154 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 741 961 1500 - - -
Stage 1 931 -----
Stage 2 879 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 722 957 1497 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 722 -----
Stage 1 909 -----
Stage 2 877 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.3 1.9 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1497 - 881 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - 0.043 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 9.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
2: Tim Bell Rd & Bentley St Existing PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 36 22 5 32 26 11 58 17 21 37 14
Future Vol, veh/h 23 36 22 5 32 26 11 58 17 21 37 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles, % 000000000000
Mvmt Flow 26 40 25 6 36 29 12 65 19 24 42 16
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.5 7.8 7.8

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 13% 28% 8% 29%
Vol Thru, % 67% 44% 51% 51%
Vol Right, % 20% 27% 41% 19%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 86 81 63 72
LT Vol 11 23 5 21
Through Vol 58 36 32 37
RT Vol 17 22 26 14
Lane Flow Rate 97 91 71 81
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.114 0.108 0.082 0.097
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.262 4.263 4.16 4.3
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 846 844 864 836
Service Time 2.262 2.276 2.174 2.313
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.115 0.108 0.082 0.097
HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.8 7.5 7.8
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
3: Tim Bell Rd & Welch St Existing PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 23 4 25 17 16 4 78 44 22 45 5
Future Vol, veh/h 10 23 4 25 17 16 4 78 44 22 45 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000000000
Mvmt Flow 11 24 4 26 18 17 4 82 46 23 47 5
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.7

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 3% 27% 43% 31%
Vol Thru, % 62% 62% 29% 62%
Vol Right, % 35% 11% 28% 7%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 126 37 58 72
LT Vol 4 10 25 22
Through Vol 78 23 17 45
RT Vol 44 4 16 5
Lane Flow Rate 133 39 61 76
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.145 0.048 0.073 0.088
Departure Headway (Hd) 3.928 4.404 4.312 4.196
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 901 818 835 842
Service Time 2.009 2.406 2.314 2.283
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.148 0.048 0.073 0.09
HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.7
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Tim Bell Rd & Yosemite Blvd Existing PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 90 290 14 0 228 32 11 0 0 19 1 59
Future Vol, veh/h 90 290 14 0 228 32 11 0 0 19 1 59
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 01100001100
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 30030000000
Mvmt Flow 99 319 15 0 251 35 12 0 0 21 1 65
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 286 0 0 335 0 0 828 812 329 795 802 269 Stage 1 - - - - - - 526 526 - 269 269 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 302 286 - 526 533 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1288 - - 1236 - - 293 315 717 308 320 775 Stage 1 - - - - - - 539 532 - 741 690 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 712 679 - 539 528 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1288 - - 1235 - - 248 285 716 285 289 775 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 248 285 - 285 289 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 487 481 - 671 690 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 651 679 - 487 477 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 0 20.3 12.9

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 248 1288 - - 1235 - - 540
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 0.077 ----- 0.161
HCM Control Delay (s) 20.3 8 0 - 0 - - 12.9
HCM Lane LOS C A A - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.6
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Oakdale Waterford Highway & Tweed St Existing PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 1 21 17 1 8 15 180 22 24 300 2
Future Vol, veh/h 3 1 21 17 1 8 15 180 22 24 300 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 00002202202
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 200 - - 180 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000040040
Mvmt Flow 3 1 22 18 1 9 16 191 23 26 319 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 616 622 322 621 612 207 323 0 0 216 0 0 Stage 1 374 374 - 237 237 -------
Stage 2 242 248 - 384 375 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 406 405 724 403 411 839 1248 - - 1366 - - Stage 1 651 621 - 771 713 -------
Stage 2 766 705 - 643 621 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 390 390 723 380 396 836 1246 - - 1363 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 390 390 - 380 396 -------
Stage 1 641 608 - 759 702 -------
Stage 2 746 694 - 610 608 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10.9 13.4 0.5 0.6

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1246 - - 636 457 1363 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.042 0.061 0.019 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 - - 10.9 13.4 7.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0.1 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Tim Bell Rd & Bonnie Brae Ave Existing + Site 1 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 11 16 94 75 5
Future Vol, veh/h 2 11 16 94 75 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 24004
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 2 12 18 106 84 6
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 233 93 94 0 - 0
Stage 1 91 -----
Stage 2 142 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 760 970 1513 - - -
Stage 1 938 -----
Stage 2 890 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 744 964 1507 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 744 -----
Stage 1 922 -----
Stage 2 886 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9 1.1 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1507 - 922 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - 0.016 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
2: Tim Bell Rd & Bentley St Existing + Site 1 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.6
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 13 5 17 7 32 12 34 11 11 63 16
Future Vol, veh/h 18 13 5 17 7 32 12 34 11 11 63 16
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Heavy Vehicles, % 000000000000
Mvmt Flow 23 16 6 22 9 41 15 43 14 14 80 20
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.4 7.6 7.8

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 21% 50% 30% 12%
Vol Thru, % 60% 36% 12% 70%
Vol Right, % 19% 14% 57% 18%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 57 36 56 90
LT Vol 12 18 17 11
Through Vol 34 13 7 63
RT Vol 11 5 32 16
Lane Flow Rate 72 46 71 114
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.083 0.056 0.08 0.129
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.117 4.398 4.075 4.076
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 857 819 884 868
Service Time 2.205 2.4 2.077 2.155
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.084 0.056 0.08 0.131
HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.7 7.4 7.8
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
3: Tim Bell Rd & Welch St Existing + Site 1 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 7 0 21 26 8 0 38 12 1 84 13
Future Vol, veh/h 9 7 0 21 26 8 0 38 12 1 84 13
Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000000000
Mvmt Flow 12 9 0 27 33 10 0 49 15 1 108 17
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.7 7.4 7.8

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 56% 38% 1%
Vol Thru, % 76% 44% 47% 86%
Vol Right, % 24% 0% 15% 13%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 50 16 55 98
LT Vol 0 9 21 1
Through Vol 38 7 26 84
RT Vol 12 0 8 13
Lane Flow Rate 64 21 71 126
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.071 0.026 0.083 0.141
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.011 4.499 4.232 4.03
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 881 800 834 881
Service Time 2.092 2.499 2.322 2.097
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.073 0.026 0.085 0.143
HCM Control Delay 7.4 7.6 7.7 7.8
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.5
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Tim Bell Rd & Yosemite Blvd Existing + Site 1 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 129 6 0 319 11 4 2 0 7 0 98
Future Vol, veh/h 38 129 6 0 319 11 4 2 0 7 0 98
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 01102001100
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 70070000000
Mvmt Flow 43 147 7 0 363 13 5 2 0 8 0 111
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 378 0 0 155 0 0 663 616 153 611 613 372 Stage 1 - - - - - - 238 238 - 372 372 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 425 378 - 239 241 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1192 - - 1438 - - 377 409 898 409 410 678 Stage 1 - - - - - - 770 712 - 653 622 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 611 619 - 769 710 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1190 - - 1437 - - 305 391 896 393 392 677 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 305 391 - 393 392 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 738 683 - 626 621 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 510 618 - 735 681 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 0 16.2 11.8

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 329 1190 - - 1437 - - 646
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 0.036 ----- 0.185
HCM Control Delay (s) 16.2 8.1 0 - 0 - - 11.8
HCM Lane LOS C A A - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.7
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Oakdale Waterford Highway & Tweed St Existing + Site 1 AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 0 8 24 0 19 9 187 6 3 118 0
Future Vol, veh/h 5 0 8 24 0 19 9 187 6 3 118 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 01101101101
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 200 - - 180 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000060060
Mvmt Flow 6 0 9 28 0 22 10 215 7 3 136 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 394 386 138 388 383 221 137 0 0 223 0 0 Stage 1 143 143 - 240 240 -------
Stage 2 251 243 - 148 143 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 569 551 916 574 553 824 1459 - - 1358 - - Stage 1 865 782 - 768 711 -------
Stage 2 758 708 - 859 782 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 549 545 914 563 547 822 1458 - - 1357 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 549 545 - 563 547 -------
Stage 1 858 780 - 762 705 -------
Stage 2 732 702 - 848 780 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10 11 0.3 0.2

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1458 - - 728 654 1357 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.021 0.076 0.003 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 - - 10 11 7.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Tim Bell Rd & Bonnie Brae Ave Existing + Site 1 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 26 30 82 80 11
Future Vol, veh/h 9 26 30 82 80 11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 10 29 34 92 90 12
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 258 100 104 0 - 0
Stage 1 98 -----
Stage 2 160 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 735 961 1500 - - -
Stage 1 931 -----
Stage 2 874 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 714 957 1497 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 714 -----
Stage 1 907 -----
Stage 2 872 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.3 2 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1497 - 880 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 - 0.045 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 9.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
2: Tim Bell Rd & Bentley St Existing + Site 1 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 36 22 5 32 26 11 60 17 21 38 14
Future Vol, veh/h 23 36 22 5 32 26 11 60 17 21 38 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles, % 000000000000
Mvmt Flow 26 40 25 6 36 29 12 67 19 24 43 16
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.6 7.8 7.8

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 12% 28% 8% 29%
Vol Thru, % 68% 44% 51% 52%
Vol Right, % 19% 27% 41% 19%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 88 81 63 73
LT Vol 11 23 5 21
Through Vol 60 36 32 38
RT Vol 17 22 26 14
Lane Flow Rate 99 91 71 82
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.117 0.108 0.082 0.098
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.254 4.272 4.169 4.304
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 845 842 862 835
Service Time 2.266 2.284 2.182 2.317
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.117 0.108 0.082 0.098
HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.8 7.6 7.8
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
3: Tim Bell Rd & Welch St Existing + Site 1 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 23 4 25 17 16 4 80 44 22 46 5
Future Vol, veh/h 10 23 4 25 17 16 4 80 44 22 46 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000000000
Mvmt Flow 11 24 4 26 18 17 4 84 46 23 48 5
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.7

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 3% 27% 43% 30%
Vol Thru, % 62% 62% 29% 63%
Vol Right, % 34% 11% 28% 7%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 128 37 58 73
LT Vol 4 10 25 22
Through Vol 80 23 17 46
RT Vol 44 4 16 5
Lane Flow Rate 135 39 61 77
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.147 0.048 0.073 0.09
Departure Headway (Hd) 3.932 4.412 4.32 4.197
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 899 816 834 841
Service Time 2.014 2.414 2.321 2.285
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.15 0.048 0.073 0.092
HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.7
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Tim Bell Rd & Yosemite Blvd Existing + Site 1 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 92 290 14 0 228 32 11 0 0 19 1 60
Future Vol, veh/h 92 290 14 0 228 32 11 0 0 19 1 60
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 01100001100
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 30030000000
Mvmt Flow 101 319 15 0 251 35 12 0 0 21 1 66
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 286 0 0 335 0 0 832 816 329 799 806 269 Stage 1 - - - - - - 530 530 - 269 269 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 302 286 - 530 537 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1288 - - 1236 - - 291 314 717 306 318 775 Stage 1 - - - - - - 536 530 - 741 690 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 712 679 - 536 526 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1288 - - 1235 - - 246 284 716 283 287 775 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 246 284 - 283 287 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 484 479 - 670 690 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 650 679 - 484 475 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.9 0 20.4 13

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 246 1288 - - 1235 - - 540
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 0.078 ----- 0.163
HCM Control Delay (s) 20.4 8 0 - 0 - - 13
HCM Lane LOS C A A - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 - - 0 - - 0.6
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Oakdale Waterford Highway & Tweed St Existing + Site 1 PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 1 21 19 1 13 15 180 26 33 300 2
Future Vol, veh/h 3 1 21 19 1 13 15 180 26 33 300 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 00002202202
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 200 - - 180 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000040040
Mvmt Flow 3 1 22 20 1 14 16 191 28 35 319 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 639 645 322 641 632 209 323 0 0 221 0 0 Stage 1 392 392 - 239 239 -------
Stage 2 247 253 - 402 393 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 392 393 724 390 400 836 1248 - - 1360 - - Stage 1 637 610 - 769 711 -------
Stage 2 761 701 - 629 609 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 372 376 723 365 383 833 1246 - - 1357 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 372 376 - 365 383 -------
Stage 1 627 593 - 757 700 -------
Stage 2 736 690 - 593 592 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 11 13.3 0.5 0.8

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1246 - - 629 470 1357 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.042 0.075 0.026 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 - - 11 13.3 7.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0.1 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Tim Bell Rd & Bonnie Brae Ave Existing + Site 2 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 13 23 96 76 5
Future Vol, veh/h 2 13 23 96 76 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 24004
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 2 15 26 108 85 6
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 252 94 95 0 - 0
Stage 1 92 -----
Stage 2 160 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 741 968 1512 - - -
Stage 1 937 -----
Stage 2 874 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 722 962 1506 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 722 -----
Stage 1 916 -----
Stage 2 871 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9 1.4 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1506 - 921 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - 0.018 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
2: Tim Bell Rd & Bentley St Existing + Site 2 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 13 5 17 7 32 12 36 11 11 69 16
Future Vol, veh/h 17 13 5 17 7 32 12 36 11 11 69 16
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Heavy Vehicles, % 000000000000
Mvmt Flow 22 16 6 22 9 41 15 46 14 14 87 20
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.5 7.6 7.8

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 20% 49% 30% 11%
Vol Thru, % 61% 37% 12% 72%
Vol Right, % 19% 14% 57% 17%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 59 35 56 96
LT Vol 12 17 17 11
Through Vol 36 13 7 69
RT Vol 11 5 32 16
Lane Flow Rate 75 44 71 122
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.086 0.054 0.081 0.138
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.122 4.417 4.097 4.079
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 855 815 880 866
Service Time 2.214 2.419 2.098 2.161
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.088 0.054 0.081 0.141
HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.7 7.5 7.8
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.5
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
3: Tim Bell Rd & Welch St Existing + Site 2 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 7 0 21 26 8 0 40 12 1 90 13
Future Vol, veh/h 9 7 0 21 26 8 0 40 12 1 90 13
Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000000000
Mvmt Flow 12 9 0 27 33 10 0 51 15 1 115 17
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.7 7.4 7.8

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 56% 38% 1%
Vol Thru, % 77% 44% 47% 87%
Vol Right, % 23% 0% 15% 12%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 52 16 55 104
LT Vol 0 9 21 1
Through Vol 40 7 26 90
RT Vol 12 0 8 13
Lane Flow Rate 67 21 71 133
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.074 0.026 0.083 0.149
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.023 4.521 4.25 4.036
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 878 797 830 879
Service Time 2.105 2.521 2.343 2.104
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.076 0.026 0.086 0.151
HCM Control Delay 7.4 7.6 7.7 7.8
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.5
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Tim Bell Rd & Yosemite Blvd Existing + Site 2 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 129 6 0 319 11 4 2 0 7 0 104
Future Vol, veh/h 40 129 6 0 319 11 4 2 0 7 0 104
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 01102001100
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 70070000000
Mvmt Flow 45 147 7 0 363 13 5 2 0 8 0 118
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 378 0 0 155 0 0 671 620 153 615 617 372 Stage 1 - - - - - - 242 242 - 372 372 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 429 378 - 243 245 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1192 - - 1438 - - 373 407 898 406 408 678 Stage 1 - - - - - - 766 709 - 653 622 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 608 619 - 765 707 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1190 - - 1437 - - 298 389 896 391 390 677 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 298 389 - 391 390 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 734 679 - 625 621 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 502 618 - 730 677 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.9 0 16.4 11.9

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 323 1190 - - 1437 - - 647
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 0.038 ----- 0.195
HCM Control Delay (s) 16.4 8.1 0 - 0 - - 11.9
HCM Lane LOS C A A - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.7
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Oakdale Waterford Highway & Tweed St Existing + Site 2 AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 0 8 18 0 15 9 189 4 2 119 0
Future Vol, veh/h 5 0 8 18 0 15 9 189 4 2 119 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 01101101101
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 200 - - 180 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000060060
Mvmt Flow 6 0 9 21 0 17 10 217 5 2 137 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 391 385 139 388 383 222 138 0 0 223 0 0 Stage 1 142 142 - 241 241 -------
Stage 2 249 243 - 147 142 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 572 552 915 574 553 823 1458 - - 1358 - - Stage 1 866 783 - 767 710 -------
Stage 2 759 708 - 860 783 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 555 546 913 564 547 821 1457 - - 1357 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 555 546 - 564 547 -------
Stage 1 859 781 - 761 704 -------
Stage 2 737 702 - 849 781 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10 10.8 0.3 0.1

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1457 - - 732 658 1357 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.02 0.058 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 - - 10 10.8 7.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Tim Bell Rd & Enid Dr Existing + Site 2 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 10 109 2 4 85
Future Vol, veh/h 7 10 109 2 4 85
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 8 11 118 2 4 92
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 219 119 0 0 120 0
Stage 1 119 -----
Stage 2 100 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 774 938 - - 1480 -
Stage 1 911 -----
Stage 2 929 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 772 938 - - 1480 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 772 -----
Stage 1 911 -----
Stage 2 926 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.3 0 0.3

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 862 1480 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.021 0.003 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.3 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Tim Bell Rd & Bonnie Brae Ave Existing + Site 2 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 33 33 84 84 11
Future Vol, veh/h 9 33 33 84 84 11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 10 37 37 94 94 12
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 270 104 108 0 - 0
Stage 1 102 -----
Stage 2 168 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 724 956 1495 - - -
Stage 1 927 -----
Stage 2 867 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 702 952 1492 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 702 -----
Stage 1 901 -----
Stage 2 865 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.3 2.1 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1492 - 885 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 - 0.053 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 9.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.2 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
2: Tim Bell Rd & Bentley St Existing + Site 2 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 36 22 5 32 26 11 65 17 21 41 14
Future Vol, veh/h 23 36 22 5 32 26 11 65 17 21 41 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles, % 000000000000
Mvmt Flow 26 40 25 6 36 29 12 73 19 24 46 16
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.6 7.9 7.8

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 12% 28% 8% 28%
Vol Thru, % 70% 44% 51% 54%
Vol Right, % 18% 27% 41% 18%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 93 81 63 76
LT Vol 11 23 5 21
Through Vol 65 36 32 41
RT Vol 17 22 26 14
Lane Flow Rate 104 91 71 85
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.124 0.109 0.082 0.102
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.264 4.293 4.192 4.315
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 843 837 857 833
Service Time 2.276 2.305 2.204 2.327
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.123 0.109 0.083 0.102
HCM Control Delay 7.9 7.8 7.6 7.8
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
3: Tim Bell Rd & Welch St Existing + Site 2 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 23 4 25 17 16 4 85 44 22 49 5
Future Vol, veh/h 10 23 4 25 17 16 4 85 44 22 49 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000000000
Mvmt Flow 11 24 4 26 18 17 4 89 46 23 52 5
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.7 7.8 7.7

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 3% 27% 43% 29%
Vol Thru, % 64% 62% 29% 64%
Vol Right, % 33% 11% 28% 7%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 133 37 58 76
LT Vol 4 10 25 22
Through Vol 85 23 17 49
RT Vol 44 4 16 5
Lane Flow Rate 140 39 61 80
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.153 0.048 0.074 0.093
Departure Headway (Hd) 3.942 4.43 4.337 4.2
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 896 813 831 840
Service Time 2.026 2.432 2.338 2.291
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.156 0.048 0.073 0.095
HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.7 7.7 7.7
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Tim Bell Rd & Yosemite Blvd Existing + Site 2 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 97 290 14 0 228 32 11 0 0 19 1 63
Future Vol, veh/h 97 290 14 0 228 32 11 0 0 19 1 63
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 01100001100
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 30030000000
Mvmt Flow 107 319 15 0 251 35 12 0 0 21 1 69
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 286 0 0 335 0 0 846 828 329 811 818 269 Stage 1 - - - - - - 542 542 - 269 269 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 304 286 - 542 549 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1288 - - 1236 - - 284 309 717 300 313 775 Stage 1 - - - - - - 528 523 - 741 690 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 710 679 - 528 520 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1288 - - 1235 - - 237 277 716 276 281 775 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 237 277 - 276 281 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 474 469 - 665 690 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 646 679 - 474 466 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.9 0 21 13

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 237 1288 - - 1235 - - 540
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 0.083 ----- 0.169
HCM Control Delay (s) 21 8 0 - 0 - - 13
HCM Lane LOS C A A - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 - - 0 - - 0.6
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Oakdale Waterford Highway & Tweed St Existing + Site 2 PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 1 21 17 1 8 15 182 22 24 304 2
Future Vol, veh/h 3 1 21 17 1 8 15 182 22 24 304 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 00002202202
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 200 - - 180 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000040040
Mvmt Flow 3 1 22 18 1 9 16 194 23 26 323 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 623 629 326 628 619 210 327 0 0 219 0 0 Stage 1 378 378 - 240 240 -------
Stage 2 245 251 - 388 379 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 401 402 720 398 407 835 1244 - - 1362 - - Stage 1 648 619 - 768 711 -------
Stage 2 763 703 - 640 618 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 385 388 719 375 392 832 1242 - - 1359 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 385 388 - 375 392 -------
Stage 1 638 606 - 756 700 -------
Stage 2 743 692 - 607 605 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10.9 13.5 0.5 0.6

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1242 - - 632 452 1359 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.042 0.061 0.019 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 - - 10.9 13.5 7.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0.1 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Tim Bell Rd & Enid Dr Existing + Site 2 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 7 110 7 12 105
Future Vol, veh/h 4 7 110 7 12 105
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 4 8 120 8 13 114
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 264 124 0 0 128 0
Stage 1 124 -----
Stage 2 140 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 729 932 - - 1470 -
Stage 1 907 -----
Stage 2 892 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 722 932 - - 1470 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 722 -----
Stage 1 907 -----
Stage 2 884 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.3 0 0.8

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 843 1470 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.014 0.009 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.3 7.5 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Tim Bell Rd & Bonnie Brae Ave Existing + Site 3 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 10 15 99 89 18
Future Vol, veh/h 6 10 15 99 89 18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 24004
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 7 11 17 111 100 20
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 259 116 124 0 - 0
Stage 1 114 -----
Stage 2 145 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 734 942 1475 - - -
Stage 1 916 -----
Stage 2 887 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 719 937 1469 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 719 -----
Stage 1 901 -----
Stage 2 883 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.4 1 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1469 - 841 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 - 0.021 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 9.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
2: Tim Bell Rd & Bentley St Existing + Site 3 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 13 5 17 7 32 12 38 11 11 75 17
Future Vol, veh/h 18 13 5 17 7 32 12 38 11 11 75 17
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Heavy Vehicles, % 000000000000
Mvmt Flow 23 16 6 22 9 41 15 48 14 14 95 22
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.5 7.6 7.9

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 20% 50% 30% 11%
Vol Thru, % 62% 36% 12% 73%
Vol Right, % 18% 14% 57% 17%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 61 36 56 103
LT Vol 12 18 17 11
Through Vol 38 13 7 75
RT Vol 11 5 32 17
Lane Flow Rate 77 46 71 130
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.089 0.056 0.081 0.148
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.135 4.447 4.124 4.085
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 852 810 874 866
Service Time 2.229 2.449 2.125 2.167
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.09 0.057 0.081 0.15
HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.7 7.5 7.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.5
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
3: Tim Bell Rd & Welch St Existing + Site 3 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 7 0 21 26 8 0 42 12 1 96 13
Future Vol, veh/h 9 7 0 21 26 8 0 42 12 1 96 13
Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000000000
Mvmt Flow 12 9 0 27 33 10 0 54 15 1 123 17
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.8 7.5 7.9

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 56% 38% 1%
Vol Thru, % 78% 44% 47% 87%
Vol Right, % 22% 0% 15% 12%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 54 16 55 110
LT Vol 0 9 21 1
Through Vol 42 7 26 96
RT Vol 12 0 8 13
Lane Flow Rate 69 21 71 141
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.078 0.026 0.086 0.158
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.033 4.547 4.368 4.043
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 874 792 825 876
Service Time 2.124 2.549 2.368 2.118
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.079 0.027 0.086 0.161
HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.7 7.8 7.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.6
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Tim Bell Rd & Yosemite Blvd Existing + Site 3 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 42 129 6 0 319 11 4 2 0 7 0 110
Future Vol, veh/h 42 129 6 0 319 11 4 2 0 7 0 110
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 01102001100
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 70070000000
Mvmt Flow 48 147 7 0 363 13 5 2 0 8 0 125
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 378 0 0 155 0 0 680 626 153 621 623 372 Stage 1 - - - - - - 248 248 - 372 372 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 432 378 - 249 251 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1192 - - 1438 - - 368 403 898 403 405 678 Stage 1 - - - - - - 760 705 - 653 622 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 606 619 - 759 703 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1190 - - 1437 - - 290 384 896 386 386 677 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 290 384 - 386 386 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 726 673 - 623 621 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 494 618 - 722 671 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.9 0 16.6 12

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 316 1190 - - 1437 - - 648
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 0.04 ----- 0.205
HCM Control Delay (s) 16.6 8.2 0 - 0 - - 12
HCM Lane LOS C A A - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.8
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Oakdale Waterford Highway & Tweed St Existing + Site 3 AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 0 8 18 0 15 9 189 4 2 119 0
Future Vol, veh/h 5 0 8 18 0 15 9 189 4 2 119 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 01101101101
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 200 - - 180 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000060060
Mvmt Flow 6 0 9 21 0 17 10 217 5 2 137 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 391 385 139 388 383 222 138 0 0 223 0 0 Stage 1 142 142 - 241 241 -------
Stage 2 249 243 - 147 142 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 572 552 915 574 553 823 1458 - - 1358 - - Stage 1 866 783 - 767 710 -------
Stage 2 759 708 - 860 783 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 555 546 913 564 547 821 1457 - - 1357 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 555 546 - 564 547 -------
Stage 1 859 781 - 761 704 -------
Stage 2 737 702 - 849 781 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10 10.8 0.3 0.1

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1457 - - 732 658 1357 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.02 0.058 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 - - 10 10.8 7.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Tim Bell Rd & "B" St Existing + Site 3 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 3 100 5 1 91
Future Vol, veh/h 16 3 100 5 1 91
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 17 3 109 5 1 99
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 213 112 0 0 114 0
Stage 1 112 -----
Stage 2 101 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 780 947 - - 1488 -
Stage 1 918 -----
Stage 2 928 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 779 947 - - 1488 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 779 -----
Stage 1 918 -----
Stage 2 927 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.6 0 0.1

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 801 1488 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.026 0.001 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.6 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Tim Bell Rd & "A" Way Existing + Site 3 AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 2 99 4 1 81
Future Vol, veh/h 11 2 99 4 1 81
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 12 2 108 4 1 88
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 200 110 0 0 112 0
Stage 1 110 -----
Stage 2 90 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 793 949 - - 1490 -
Stage 1 920 -----
Stage 2 939 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 792 949 - - 1490 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 792 -----
Stage 1 920 -----
Stage 2 938 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.5 0 0.1

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 813 1490 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.017 0.001 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.5 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Tim Bell Rd & Bonnie Brae Ave Existing + Site 3 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 25 28 94 87 18
Future Vol, veh/h 20 25 28 94 87 18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 22 28 31 106 98 20
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 278 112 120 0 - 0
Stage 1 110 -----
Stage 2 168 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 716 947 1480 - - -
Stage 1 920 -----
Stage 2 867 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 697 943 1477 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 697 -----
Stage 1 898 -----
Stage 2 865 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.7 1.7 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1477 - 815 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - 0.062 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 9.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.2 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
2: Tim Bell Rd & Bentley St Existing + Site 3 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 36 22 5 32 26 11 70 17 21 44 14
Future Vol, veh/h 23 36 22 5 32 26 11 70 17 21 44 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles, % 000000000000
Mvmt Flow 26 40 25 6 36 29 12 79 19 24 49 16
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay 7.9 7.6 7.9 7.9

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 11% 28% 8% 27%
Vol Thru, % 71% 44% 51% 56%
Vol Right, % 17% 27% 41% 18%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 98 81 63 79
LT Vol 11 23 5 21
Through Vol 70 36 32 44
RT Vol 17 22 26 14
Lane Flow Rate 110 91 71 89
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.131 0.109 0.083 0.107
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.273 4.313 4.211 4.322
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 841 833 853 831
Service Time 2.287 2.329 2.227 2.338
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.131 0.109 0.083 0.107
HCM Control Delay 7.9 7.9 7.6 7.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
3: Tim Bell Rd & Welch St Existing + Site 3 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 23 4 25 17 16 4 90 44 22 52 5
Future Vol, veh/h 10 23 4 25 17 16 4 90 44 22 52 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000000000
Mvmt Flow 11 24 4 26 18 17 4 95 46 23 55 5
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.7 7.8 7.8

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 3% 27% 43% 28%
Vol Thru, % 65% 62% 29% 66%
Vol Right, % 32% 11% 28% 6%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 138 37 58 79
LT Vol 4 10 25 22
Through Vol 90 23 17 52
RT Vol 44 4 16 5
Lane Flow Rate 145 39 61 83
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.159 0.048 0.074 0.097
Departure Headway (Hd) 3.952 4.449 4.356 4.204
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 893 809 827 839
Service Time 2.037 2.451 2.357 2.296
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.162 0.048 0.074 0.099
HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.7 7.7 7.8
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.3
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Tim Bell Rd & Yosemite Blvd Existing + Site 3 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 102 290 14 0 228 32 11 0 0 19 1 66
Future Vol, veh/h 102 290 14 0 228 32 11 0 0 19 1 66
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 01100001100
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 30030000000
Mvmt Flow 112 319 15 0 251 35 12 0 0 21 1 73
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 286 0 0 335 0 0 858 838 329 821 828 269 Stage 1 - - - - - - 552 552 - 269 269 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 306 286 - 552 559 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1288 - - 1236 - - 279 305 717 296 309 775 Stage 1 - - - - - - 522 518 - 741 690 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 708 679 - 522 514 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1288 - - 1235 - - 231 272 716 271 276 775 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 231 272 - 271 276 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 466 462 - 662 690 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 641 679 - 466 458 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2 0 21.4 13.1

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 231 1288 - - 1235 - - 541
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.052 0.087 ----- 0.175
HCM Control Delay (s) 21.4 8.1 0 - 0 - - 13.1
HCM Lane LOS C A A - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 - - 0 - - 0.6
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Oakdale Waterford Highway & Tweed St Existing + Site 3 PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 1 21 17 1 8 15 182 22 24 304 2
Future Vol, veh/h 3 1 21 17 1 8 15 182 22 24 304 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 00002202202
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 200 - - 180 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000040040
Mvmt Flow 3 1 22 18 1 9 16 194 23 26 323 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 623 629 326 628 619 210 327 0 0 219 0 0 Stage 1 378 378 - 240 240 -------
Stage 2 245 251 - 388 379 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 401 402 720 398 407 835 1244 - - 1362 - - Stage 1 648 619 - 768 711 -------
Stage 2 763 703 - 640 618 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 385 388 719 375 392 832 1242 - - 1359 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 385 388 - 375 392 -------
Stage 1 638 606 - 756 700 -------
Stage 2 743 692 - 607 605 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10.9 13.5 0.5 0.6

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1242 - - 632 452 1359 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.042 0.061 0.019 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 - - 10.9 13.5 7.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0.1 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Tim Bell Rd & "B" St Existing + Site 3 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 4 98 14 7 97
Future Vol, veh/h 8 4 98 14 7 97
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 9 4 107 15 8 105
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 236 115 0 0 122 0
Stage 1 115 -----
Stage 2 121 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 757 943 - - 1478 -
Stage 1 915 -----
Stage 2 909 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 752 943 - - 1478 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 752 -----
Stage 1 915 -----
Stage 2 904 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.5 0 0.5

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 806 1478 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.016 0.005 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.5 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Tim Bell Rd & "A" Way Existing + Site 3 PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 3 93 9 5 98
Future Vol, veh/h 6 3 93 9 5 98
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 7 3 101 10 5 107
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 223 106 0 0 111 0
Stage 1 106 -----
Stage 2 117 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 770 954 - - 1492 -
Stage 1 923 -----
Stage 2 913 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 767 954 - - 1492 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 767 -----
Stage 1 923 -----
Stage 2 909 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.4 0 0.4

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 821 1492 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.012 0.004 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.4 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Tim Bell Rd & Bonnie Brae Ave Existing + All Sites AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 14 24 101 90 18
Future Vol, veh/h 6 14 24 101 90 18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 24004
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 7 16 27 113 101 20
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 282 117 125 0 - 0
Stage 1 115 -----
Stage 2 167 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 712 941 1474 - - -
Stage 1 915 -----
Stage 2 867 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 692 936 1468 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 692 -----
Stage 1 893 -----
Stage 2 864 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.4 1.4 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1468 - 846 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - 0.027 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 9.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
2: Tim Bell Rd & Bentley St Existing + All Sites AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 13 5 17 7 32 12 40 11 11 81 19
Future Vol, veh/h 19 13 5 17 7 32 12 40 11 11 81 19
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Heavy Vehicles, % 000000000000
Mvmt Flow 24 16 6 22 9 41 15 51 14 14 103 24
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.5 7.7 8

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 19% 51% 30% 10%
Vol Thru, % 63% 35% 12% 73%
Vol Right, % 17% 14% 57% 17%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 63 37 56 111
LT Vol 12 19 17 11
Through Vol 40 13 7 81
RT Vol 11 5 32 19
Lane Flow Rate 80 47 71 141
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.092 0.058 0.082 0.159
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.147 4.479 4.153 4.083
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 849 804 868 866
Service Time 2.247 2.482 2.154 2.171
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.094 0.058 0.082 0.163
HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.8 7.5 8
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.6
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
3: Tim Bell Rd & Welch St Existing + All Sites AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 7 0 21 26 8 0 44 12 1 102 13
Future Vol, veh/h 9 7 0 21 26 8 0 44 12 1 102 13
Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000000000
Mvmt Flow 12 9 0 27 33 10 0 56 15 1 131 17
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.8 7.5 7.9

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 56% 38% 1%
Vol Thru, % 79% 44% 47% 88%
Vol Right, % 21% 0% 15% 11%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 56 16 55 116
LT Vol 0 9 21 1
Through Vol 44 7 26 102
RT Vol 12 0 8 13
Lane Flow Rate 72 21 71 149
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.081 0.026 0.086 0.167
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.044 4.57 4.39 4.048
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 872 788 821 874
Service Time 2.136 2.572 2.391 2.124
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.083 0.027 0.086 0.17
HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.7 7.8 7.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.6
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Tim Bell Rd & Yosemite Blvd Existing + All Sites AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 129 6 0 319 11 4 2 0 7 0 116
Future Vol, veh/h 44 129 6 0 319 11 4 2 0 7 0 116
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 01102001100
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 70070000000
Mvmt Flow 50 147 7 0 363 13 5 2 0 8 0 132
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 378 0 0 155 0 0 688 630 153 625 627 372 Stage 1 - - - - - - 252 252 - 372 372 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 436 378 - 253 255 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1192 - - 1438 - - 363 401 898 400 403 678 Stage 1 - - - - - - 757 702 - 653 622 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 603 619 - 756 700 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1190 - - 1437 - - 282 381 896 383 383 677 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 282 381 - 383 383 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 721 669 - 622 621 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 486 618 - 718 667 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2 0 16.9 12.1

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 309 1190 - - 1437 - - 649
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 0.042 ----- 0.215
HCM Control Delay (s) 16.9 8.2 0 - 0 - - 12.1
HCM Lane LOS C A A - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.8
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Oakdale Waterford Highway & Tweed St Existing + All Sites AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 0 8 24 0 19 9 191 6 3 120 0
Future Vol, veh/h 5 0 8 24 0 19 9 191 6 3 120 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 01101101101
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 200 - - 180 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000060060
Mvmt Flow 6 0 9 28 0 22 10 220 7 3 138 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 401 393 140 395 390 226 139 0 0 228 0 0 Stage 1 145 145 - 245 245 -------
Stage 2 256 248 - 150 145 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 563 546 913 568 548 818 1457 - - 1352 - - Stage 1 863 781 - 763 707 -------
Stage 2 753 705 - 857 781 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 543 540 911 557 542 816 1456 - - 1351 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 543 540 - 557 542 -------
Stage 1 856 779 - 757 701 -------
Stage 2 727 699 - 846 779 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10.1 11 0.3 0.2

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1456 - - 723 648 1351 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.021 0.076 0.003 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 - - 10.1 11 7.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Tim Bell Rd & Enid Dr Existing + All Sites AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 10 115 2 4 100
Future Vol, veh/h 7 10 115 2 4 100
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 8 11 125 2 4 109
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 243 126 0 0 127 0
Stage 1 126 -----
Stage 2 117 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 750 930 - - 1472 -
Stage 1 905 -----
Stage 2 913 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 748 930 - - 1472 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 748 -----
Stage 1 905 -----
Stage 2 910 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.4 0 0.3

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 845 1472 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.022 0.003 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.4 7.5 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Tim Bell Rd & "B" St Existing + All Sites AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 3 102 5 1 92
Future Vol, veh/h 16 3 102 5 1 92
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 17 3 111 5 1 100
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 216 114 0 0 116 0
Stage 1 114 -----
Stage 2 102 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 777 944 - - 1485 -
Stage 1 916 -----
Stage 2 927 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 776 944 - - 1485 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 776 -----
Stage 1 916 -----
Stage 2 926 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.6 0 0.1

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 798 1485 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.026 0.001 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.6 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Tim Bell Rd & "A" Way Existing + All Sites AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 2 101 4 1 82
Future Vol, veh/h 11 2 101 4 1 82
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 12 2 110 4 1 89
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 203 112 0 0 114 0
Stage 1 112 -----
Stage 2 91 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 790 947 - - 1488 -
Stage 1 918 -----
Stage 2 938 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 789 947 - - 1488 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 789 -----
Stage 1 918 -----
Stage 2 937 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.5 0 0.1

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 810 1488 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.017 0.001 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.5 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Tim Bell Rd & Bonnie Brae Ave Existing + All Sites PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 34 35 96 91 18
Future Vol, veh/h 20 34 35 96 91 18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 22002
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 22 38 39 108 102 20
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 300 116 124 0 - 0
Stage 1 114 -----
Stage 2 186 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 696 942 1475 - - -
Stage 1 916 -----
Stage 2 851 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 674 938 1472 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 674 -----
Stage 1 889 -----
Stage 2 849 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.7 2 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1472 - 819 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 - 0.074 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 9.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.2 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
2: Tim Bell Rd & Bentley St Existing + All Sites PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.9
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 36 22 5 32 26 11 79 17 21 49 14
Future Vol, veh/h 23 36 22 5 32 26 11 79 17 21 49 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles, % 000000000000
Mvmt Flow 26 40 25 6 36 29 12 89 19 24 55 16
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay 7.9 7.7 8 7.9

HCM LOS AAAA

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 10% 28% 8% 25%
Vol Thru, % 74% 44% 51% 58%
Vol Right, % 16% 27% 41% 17%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 107 81 63 84
LT Vol 11 23 5 21
Through Vol 79 36 32 49
RT Vol 17 22 26 14
Lane Flow Rate 120 91 71 94
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.143 0.11 0.084 0.114
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.29 4.352 4.251 4.341
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 838 825 845 828
Service Time 2.304 2.366 2.265 2.356
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.143 0.11 0.084 0.114
HCM Control Delay 8 7.9 7.7 7.9
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th AWSC
3: Tim Bell Rd & Welch St Existing + All Sites PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 23 4 25 17 16 4 99 44 22 57 5
Future Vol, veh/h 10 23 4 25 17 16 4 99 44 22 57 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000000000
Mvmt Flow 11 24 4 26 18 17 4 104 46 23 60 5
Number of Lanes 0 10010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.7 7.9 7.8

HCM LOS A A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 3% 27% 43% 26%
Vol Thru, % 67% 62% 29% 68%
Vol Right, % 30% 11% 28% 6%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 147 37 58 84
LT Vol 4 10 25 22
Through Vol 99 23 17 57
RT Vol 44 4 16 5
Lane Flow Rate 155 39 61 88
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.171 0.049 0.074 0.103
Departure Headway (Hd) 3.968 4.484 4.391 4.21
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 890 803 821 837
Service Time 2.056 2.486 2.393 2.307
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.174 0.049 0.074 0.105
HCM Control Delay 7.9 7.7 7.7 7.8
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.3
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
4: Tim Bell Rd & Yosemite Blvd Existing + All Sites PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 111 290 14 0 228 32 11 0 0 19 1 71
Future Vol, veh/h 111 290 14 0 228 32 11 0 0 19 1 71
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 01100001100
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 30030000000
Mvmt Flow 122 319 15 0 251 35 12 0 0 21 1 78
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 286 0 0 335 0 0 880 858 329 841 848 269 Stage 1 - - - - - - 572 572 - 269 269 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 308 286 - 572 579 -
Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1288 - - 1236 - - 270 297 717 287 301 775 Stage 1 - - - - - - 509 508 - 741 690 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 706 679 - 509 504 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1288 - - 1235 - - 220 262 716 261 265 775 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 220 262 - 261 265 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 449 448 - 654 690 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 634 679 - 449 445 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.2 0 22.3 13.2

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 220 1288 - - 1235 - - 541
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.055 0.095 ----- 0.185
HCM Control Delay (s) 22.3 8.1 0 - 0 - - 13.2
HCM Lane LOS C A A - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 - - 0 - - 0.7
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
5: Oakdale Waterford Highway & Tweed St Existing + All Sites PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 1 21 19 1 13 15 184 26 33 308 2
Future Vol, veh/h 3 1 21 19 1 13 15 184 26 33 308 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 00002202202
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 200 - - 180 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000040040
Mvmt Flow 3 1 22 20 1 14 16 196 28 35 328 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 653 659 331 655 646 214 332 0 0 226 0 0 Stage 1 401 401 - 244 244 -------
Stage 2 252 258 - 411 402 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 383 386 715 382 393 831 1239 - - 1354 - - Stage 1 630 604 - 764 708 -------
Stage 2 757 698 - 622 604 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 363 369 714 358 376 828 1237 - - 1351 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 363 369 - 358 376 -------
Stage 1 621 587 - 753 697 -------
Stage 2 732 688 - 586 587 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 11.1 13.4 0.5 0.7

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1237 - - 619 462 1351 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.043 0.076 0.026 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 - - 11.1 13.4 7.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0.1 - -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
6: Tim Bell Rd & Enid Dr Existing + All Sites PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 7 124 7 12 113
Future Vol, veh/h 4 7 124 7 12 113
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 4 8 135 8 13 123
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 288 139 0 0 143 0
Stage 1 139 -----
Stage 2 149 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 707 915 - - 1452 -
Stage 1 893 -----
Stage 2 884 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 700 915 - - 1452 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 700 -----
Stage 1 893 -----
Stage 2 875 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.4 0 0.7

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 823 1452 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.015 0.009 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.4 7.5 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
7: Tim Bell Rd & "B" St Existing + All Sites PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 4 100 14 7 101
Future Vol, veh/h 8 4 100 14 7 101
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 9 4 109 15 8 110
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 243 117 0 0 124 0
Stage 1 117 -----
Stage 2 126 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 750 941 - - 1475 -
Stage 1 913 -----
Stage 2 905 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 746 941 - - 1475 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 746 -----
Stage 1 913 -----
Stage 2 900 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.6 0 0.5

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 801 1475 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.016 0.005 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.6 7.5 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
RES 2024-42
HCM 6th TWSC
8: Tim Bell Rd & "A" Way Existing + All Sites PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 3 95 9 5 102
Future Vol, veh/h 6 3 95 9 5 102
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 7 3 103 10 5 111
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 229 108 0 0 113 0
Stage 1 108 -----
Stage 2 121 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 764 951 - - 1489 -
Stage 1 921 -----
Stage 2 909 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 761 951 - - 1489 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 761 -----
Stage 1 921 -----
Stage 2 905 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.5 0 0.3

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 815 1489 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.012 0.004 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.5 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
RES 2024-42
EXHIBIT B – MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM RES 2024-42
MITIGATION MONITORING/
REPORTING PROGRAM

FOR THE
WATERSTONE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS
Waterford, CA
July 2024
Prepared for:

City of Waterford
101 E Street
Waterford, CA 95386
Prepared by:

BaseCamp Environmental, Inc.
802 W. Lodi Avenue
Lodi, CA 95240
209-224-8213
RES 2024-42
Waterstone Residential Subdivisions Project MMRP Page 1-1 MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
for the
WATERSTONE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS
Waterford, CA

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The City of Waterford California (City) is considering adoption of the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for, and approval of, the Waterstone Residential Subdivisions Project (project). This document is the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program (MMRP) for the project, which is to be adopted by the City in conjunction with the IS/MND and the City’s consideration of the proposed project. The primary source document for the MMRP is the Final IS/MND, a separate document.

1.1 THE PROJECT
The project proposes a Tentative Subdivision Map for each of three sites that would subdivide each site into single-family residential lots, the total number of which would be 118 lots. Site A would be subdivided into 30 lots, Site B would be subdivided into 34 lots, and Site C would be subdivided into 54 lots. Public streets and utilities would be provided on each site, with connections to existing public roadways in the area. To accommodate the proposed subdivisions, all three sites are proposed to be rezoned from their current zoning to PC, Planned Community. The rezoning, along with the Tentative Subdivision Maps, would require approval from the Waterford City Council, with the recommendation of the Waterford Planning Commission.

1.2 CEQA REQUIREMENTS REGARDING MITIGATION
MONITORING AND REPORTING
To ensure that mitigation measures included in an IS/MND are implemented, CEQA requires the adoption of a mitigation monitoring and/or reporting program (CEQA Guidelines Section 15074). The Guidelines require that the lead agency:
" . . . adopt a program for reporting on or monitoring the changes which it has either required in the project or made a condition of approval to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects."
These requirements are met by the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program table shown in Section 2.0 of this document. The table lists all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the project as identified in the Final IS/MND, identifies all of the mitigation measures needed to reduce these effects to a less than significant level, and identifies the entities that would be responsible for implementing and monitoring implementation of the mitigation measures.

RES 2024-42
Waterstone Residential Subdivisions Project MMRP Page 2-1

2.0 MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PLAN
The following table summarizes the significant environmental effects that could result from approval of the Waterstone Residential Subdivisions Project, based on the analysis contained in the adopted IS/MND. The table identifies 1) each significant effect, 2) how each significant effect would be mitigated, 3) the responsibility for implementation of the mitigation measures, and 4) the responsibility for monitoring of mitigation measures.

The table follows the same sequence as the impact analysis in the IS/MND.

Environmental issue areas where the project would have no significant effect requiring mitigation measures are also listed for the sake of continuity.

RES 2024-42
IMPACT/MITIGATION MEASURES IMPLEMENTATION
RESPONSIBILITY AND

TIMING/SCHEDULE
MONITORING/REPORTING RESPONSIBILITY
SOURCE
INFORMATION
Waterstone Residential Subdivisions Project MMRP Table Page 2-2

3.1 AESTHETICS
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

3.2 AGRICULTURE RESOURCES
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

3.3 AIR QUALITY
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Potential Impacts Special-Status Species
BIO-1: If project construction commences during the Swainson’s hawk nesting season (March 1 through September 15), a preconstruction survey for nesting Swainson’s hawk shall be conducted within one-quarter mile of the construction site. If active nests are found, then a qualified biologist shall determine the need, if any, for temporal restrictions on construction. The determination shall utilize criteria set forth by the Swainson’s Hawk Technical Advisory Committee in its 2000 report Determining a Project’s Potential for Impacting Swainson’s Hawk. Any temporal restrictions advised by the biologist shall be implemented by the project.

BIO-2: If project construction commences during the burrowing owl nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a pre-construction survey for nesting burrowing owls shall be completed on the construction site in accordance with CDFW guidelines described in the 1995 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If owls are present on the site, the biologist shall specify setbacks, construction timing or other mitigation needed to avoid significant effects on owls.

The applicant will be
responsible for retaining
the qualified biologist to
perform required surveys
and to specify temporal
restrictions if required.

The Community Development Director
will be responsible for ensuring that
biological requirements have been met
before authorizing project construction.

IS/MND,
Section 3.4
RES 2024-42
IMPACT/MITIGATION MEASURES IMPLEMENTATION
RESPONSIBILITY AND

TIMING/SCHEDULE
MONITORING/REPORTING RESPONSIBILITY
SOURCE
INFORMATION
Waterstone Residential Subdivisions Project MMRP Table Page 2-3 Potential Impacts on Fish and Wildlife Movement
BIO-3: If tree removal is proposed during the general avian nesting season (March 1 through July 31), a pre-construction survey for all species of nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. If active nests for any bird species are found, work in the vicinity of the nests shall be delayed until the young have fledged. No survey shall be required if tree removal occurs outside the general avian nesting season.

The applicant will be
responsible for retaining
the qualified biologist to
perform required surveys
and to specify temporal
restrictions if required.

The Community Development Director
will be responsible for ensuring that
biological requirements have been met
before authorizing project construction.

IS/MND,
Section 3.4

3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Potential Impacts on Archaeological Resources.

CULT-1: If buried cultural or paleontological resources are inadvertently discovered during ground-disturbing activities, work shall stop within 50 feet of the find until a qualified archaeologist or paleontologist can assess the significance of the find. If necessary, the archaeologist or paleontologist will develop appropriate treatment measures in consultation with the City of Waterford Community Development Department and other agencies as appropriate.

Treatment measures may include, but are not limited to, preservation in place or excavation under supervision of a qualified archaeologist or paleontologist.

The applicant’s engineer
will be responsible for
inserting cultural resource
reporting requirements in
the project plans and
specifications. The
contractor will be
responsible for adhering
to the listed notification
requirements.

The Community Development Director
will be responsible for ensuring that
cultural resource reporting requirements
are incorporated into the project plans and
specifications and observed during
construction.

IS/MND,
Section 3.5

3.6 ENERGY
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

3.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Potential Impacts on Geologic Instabililty
GEO-1: The project applicant shall implement the recommendations contained in the report titled Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation - Update, Proposed Subdivision, Site-2 Tim Bell Road (APN: 080-023- 036), Waterford, California, prepared by North American Technical The applicant’s engineer
will be responsible for
incorporating applicable
geotechnical
The Community Development Director
will be responsible for ensuring that
geotechnical recommendations
requirements are incorporated into the

IS/MND,
Section 3.7
RES 2024-42
IMPACT/MITIGATION MEASURES IMPLEMENTATION
RESPONSIBILITY AND

TIMING/SCHEDULE
MONITORING/REPORTING RESPONSIBILITY
SOURCE
INFORMATION
Waterstone Residential Subdivisions Project MMRP Table Page 2-4 Services, Inc. on February 8, 2024. These recommendations address site preparation, fill placement and compaction, fill materials, temporary construction slopes, and foundations and slabs, among other issues. These recommendations shall be implemented for design and construction work on all three project sites.
recommendations in the
project plans and
specifications. The
contractor will be
responsible for adhering
to the geotechnical
recommendations.
project plans and specifications and
observed during construction.

3.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

3.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Potential Impacts on Emergency Response and Evacuations HAZ-1: Prior to the start of project construction, the developer shall prepare and implement a Traffic Control Plan, which shall include such items as traffic control requirements, resident notification of access closure, and daily access restoration. The contractor shall specify dates and times of road closures or restrictions, if any, and shall ensure that adequate access will be provided for emergency vehicles. The Traffic Control Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Department of Public Works and shall be coordinated with Waterford Police Services (Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Department) and the Stanislaus Consolidated Fire Protection District if construction will require road closures or lane restrictions.

The contractor will be
responsible for
preparation and submittal
of the Traffic Control
Plan to the City for
approval.

The Public Works Director will be
responsible for review and approval of
the Traffic Control Plan.

IS/MND,
Section 3.9

3.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

3.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

RES 2024-42
IMPACT/MITIGATION MEASURES IMPLEMENTATION
RESPONSIBILITY AND

TIMING/SCHEDULE
MONITORING/REPORTING RESPONSIBILITY
SOURCE
INFORMATION
Waterstone Residential Subdivisions Project MMRP Table Page 2-5

3.12 MINERAL RESOURCES
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

3.13 NOISE
Potential impacts on Generation of Noise Exceeding Local Standards NOISE-1: The City shall establish the following as conditions of approval for any permit that results in the use of construction equipment:
● In accordance with Waterford Municipal Code Chapter 8.22, construction activities shall not occur between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and between 8:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekends and legal holidays.
● All construction equipment powered by internal combustion engines shall be properly muffled and maintained. Quiet construction equipment, particularly air compressors, are to be selected whenever possible.
● All stationary noise-generating construction equipment such as generators or air compressors are to be located as far as is practical from existing residences. In addition, the project contractor shall place such stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive
receptors nearest the project site.
● Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines is
prohibited, and in no case shall idling exceed five minutes per State regulation.
● The construction contractor shall, to the maximum extent practical, locate on-site equipment staging areas to maximize the distance between construction-related noise sources and The applicant’s engineer
will be responsible for
inserting noise control
requirements in the
project plans and
specifications. The
contractor will be
responsible for adhering
to the listed noise control
requirements.

The Community Development Director
will be responsible for ensuring that noise
control requirements are incorporated into
the project plans and specifications and
observed during construction.

IS/MND,
Section

3.13 RES 2024-42
IMPACT/MITIGATION MEASURES IMPLEMENTATION
RESPONSIBILITY AND

TIMING/SCHEDULE
MONITORING/REPORTING RESPONSIBILITY
SOURCE
INFORMATION
Waterstone Residential Subdivisions Project MMRP Table Page 2-6 noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.

3.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

3.15 PUBLIC SERVICES
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

3.16 RECREATION
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

3.17 TRANSPORTATION
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

3.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

3.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Potential Impacts on Relocation or Construction of Utility Facilities UTIL-1: Prior to final approval of the site plan, the project applicant shall prepare an improvement plan that shows the locations of proposed utility lines and other facilities. The
improvement plan(s) shall show how these facilities would connect to existing City utility systems and demonstrate The applicant’s engineer
will be responsible for
preparation of project
plans and specifications,
including utility
The Public Works Director/City Engineer
will be responsible for ensuring that noise
control requirements are incorporated into
the project plans and specifications and
observed during construction.

IS/MND,
Section

3.19 RES 2024-42
IMPACT/MITIGATION MEASURES IMPLEMENTATION
RESPONSIBILITY AND

TIMING/SCHEDULE
MONITORING/REPORTING RESPONSIBILITY
SOURCE
INFORMATION
Waterstone Residential Subdivisions Project MMRP Table Page 2-7 compliance with City standards and specifications pertinent to these facilities. The Waterford Department of Public Works shall review and approve the improvement plan.
specifications. The
contractor will be
responsible for
conformance with
improvement plans and
specifications.

3.20 WILDFIRE
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

2.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
The IS/MND does not identify significant effects or mitigation measures in this issue area.

RES 2024-42
BaseCamp
Figure 1-2
BaseCamp Environmental USGS MAP

PROJECT SITES
SOURCE: USGS Quadrangle Map, Waterford CA, 2021.

RES 2024-42
Figure 1-3
BaseCamp Environmental AERIAL PHOTO SOURCE: Google Earth SITE B
SITE C
SITE A
RES 2024-42

ORDINANCE 2024-06
ORDINANCE NO. 2024-06

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING AND ADOPTING REZONE TO PLANNED COMMUNITY 2024-01 (PC #2024-01) REZONING 4.81± ACRES; AS TO ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 080-023-036 FROM RESIDENTIAL SINGLE (RS) DISTRICT TO PLANNED COMMUNITY 2024-01 (PC #2024-01)
WHEREAS, the City of Waterford is authorized by Title 17 Chapter 17.77, to initiate a rezone whenever public necessity and convenience and the general welfare require such amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City of Waterford Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing on July 23, 2024, 2024 to consider the proposed Rezone to PC #2024-01.

WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Waterford has made the following findings for adoption.

1. An application has been received from Fitzpatrick Homes with a proposal to subdivide approximately 4.81± acres into thirty (30) single-family residential lots on property assigned the following assessor parcel number: 080-023-036; and,

2. The project site is currently zoned Residential Single (RS) and has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Low Density Residential (LD); and

3. The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property to Planned Community 2024- 01 (PC #2024-01); and

4. Notice of the public hearing on the proposed Rezone was published in the Waterford News, a newspaper of general circulation, on July 9, 2024; and

5. Notice of the public hearing on the proposed Rezone were mailed to all property owners affected by this action on July 9, 2024; and

6. Notices of the public hearing on the proposed Rezone were mailed to all property owners within 300-feet of the property, according the most recent assessor’s roll, on July 9, 2024; and

7. The City finds that pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Lead Agency (Waterford) has prepared an Initial Study and concludes that the proposed project is within the scope of the previously certified City of Waterford Vision 2025 General Plan Environmental Impact Report, and in accordance with Section 15074 of the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and considered.

ORDINANCE 2024-06
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 23, 2024 and all comments were heard and considered by the City Council.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATERFORD, COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. ZONING MAP. The Zoning Map of the City of Waterford is hereby amended in the area described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, to provide for the approval of a specific plan for Development to be known as PLANNED COMMUNITY 2024-01 (PC #2024-01), an amendment to 4.81± acres, APN 080-023-036 from property zoned RESIDENTIAL SINGLE (RS).

SECTION 2. FINDINGS. The approval of this ordinance is based on the following findings and determinations:

A. The Planning Commission, on July 23, 2024, held a noticed public hearing and made its written recommendation to the City Council to approve the rezoning to Planned Community 2024-01 (PC #2024-01).

B. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the goals, policies, and implementation measures and Low Density Residential (LD) land use of the City of Waterford Vision 2025 General Plan.

C. A noticed Public Hearing before the City Council was given in the form and manner required by State statute and the Waterford Municipal Code.

SECTION 3. CONDITIONS. The development is subject to the conditions and standards adopted in the City’s Vision 2025 General Plan for development which includes the following terms and conditions:

SECTION 4. The Zoning Map of the City of Waterford, which is attached as part of Title 17 of the City Code, is hereby amended and changed, and from and after the effective date of the Ordinance, the real property described in Exhibit A hereof shall be referred to and described on said zoning map of the City of Waterford as Planned Community 2024-01 (PC #2024-01).

A. Approval of Rezone to Planned Community 2024-01 authorizes a 30-lot singlefamily residential development shall expire within two years from the date of the approval by the City Council unless acted upon or the applicant or property owner obtains a time extension for the subdivision map.

SECTION 5. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The following development standards are hereby associated with Planned Community 2024-01 (PC #2024-01):

Development Standard Planned Community 2024-01
Lot Dimensions
Lot Size (Minimum) 3,500 square feet
Lot Width (Minimum) Interior – 45-feet
Corner – 45-feet
Lot Coverage (Maximum) 55%
Setbacks (Minimum)
Front 15-feet
Rear 8-feet
Side Interior – 5-feet
Corner – 10-feet
SECTION 6. AUTHORITY. This ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority granted by the California Constitution and State law.

SECTION 7. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 8. To the extent the provisions of the Waterford Municipal Code as amended by this Ordinance are substantially the same as the provisions of that Code as they read immediately prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, then those provisions shall be construed as continuations of the earlier provisions and not as new enactments.

SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary thereof to be published within fifteen (15) days of adoption and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against same, in the Office of the City Clerk, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.

SECTION 10. ENACTMENT: Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days from the passage and adoption thereof, this ordinance shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Stanislaus, State of California, together with names of the members of the City Council voting for and against the same.

ORDINANCE 2024-06

ORDINANCE 2024-06
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Waterford this 23rd day of July, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

CITY OF WATERFORD
_______________________
CHARLIE GOEKIN, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________ _________________________
CORBETT J. BROWNING
City Clerk City Attorney

PATRICIA KRAUSE, CMC

ORDINANCE 2024-06

EXHIBIT A
PLANNED COMMUNITY 2024-01 (PC #2024-01)

WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-43

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF WATERFORD CITY

COUNCIL APPROVING A VESTING TENTATIVE
SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 2024-01 (VTSM 2024-01);

LOCATED ON TIM BELL ROAD, WATERFORD, CA
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 080-023-036
WHEREAS, a request has been submitted by FH Land Investment, LLC (4805 Sisk Road, Modesto, CA 95357) Applicant on behalf of the Property Owner of Record (Mr. David Hendrick) as to Assessor Parcel Number 080-023-036 to subdivide 4.81± acres into thirty (30) residential lots located on Tim Bell Road. The project will connect to the City of Waterford sewer, water and storm drain services. The project site is designated by the City’s Vision 2025 General Plan as Low Density Residential (LDR) and is currently zoned Residential Single (RS); and
WHEREAS, said tentative subdivision map was received in the office of the Secretary of the Planning Commission on January 25, 2024, and was accepted for filing and deemed complete on May 21, 2024, in accordance with the provisions of Title 16: Subdivisions of the Waterford Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, copies of said vesting tentative subdivision map have been sent to the Waterford Unified School District, Modesto Irrigation District, the local utility companies, and the City Departments; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered an Initial Study, which concluded that the proposed tentative subdivision map is within the scope of the previously certified City of Waterford Vision 2025 General Plan Environmental Impact Report, and in accordance with Section 15074 of the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH No. 2024050940) has been prepared and considered; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a special public hearing on July 23, 2024, and recommended that the City Council approve VTSM 2024-01; and WHEREAS, the notice of the special public hearing on the proposed Rezone and VTSM was published in the Waterford News, a newspaper of general circulation, on August 20, 2024; and WHEREAS, notices of the special public hearing on the proposed Rezone and VTSM were mailed to all property owners within 300-feet of the property, according to the most recent assessor’s roll, on August 20, 2024; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

RES 2024-43
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Waterford makes the following findings and determinations:

1. The proposed vesting tentative subdivision map, together with the provisions for its design and improvements, and subject to the conditions is consistent with the Vision 2025 General Plan and the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California.

2. The discharge of waste as a result of the proposed subdivision into the existing sewer system will not result in a violation of existing requirements by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code of the State of California.

3. As per Sections 15182 and 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Guidelines, this Project is within the scope of the projects covered by the Vision 2025 General Plan EIR.

4. Based on the project’s Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH No. 2024050940) has been prepared for the project and it has been determined that the proposed project will not have a significant environmental effect and no mitigation measures are required in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

5. Constitutionality, severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word of this resolution is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the resolution. The Planning Commission of the City of Waterford hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, and word thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section(s), subsection(s), sentence(s), clause(s), phrase(s), or word(s) be declared invalid.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL that it approves Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 2024-01 (VTSM 2024-01), subject to the following conditions:

Project Authorization

1. The project shall be in conformance with all City Ordinances, rules, regulations, and policies.

The conditions listed below are particularly pertinent to this approval but shall not be construed to permit violation of other laws and polices not so listed.

2. Approval is limited to the conformance of the land use and zoning designations. Use of the property shall be limited to those permitted in the Planned Community (PC) zoning district as applicable, as it exists now or may be amended in the future.

RES 2024-43

3. The VTSM shall expire by: July 23, 2026 unless a building permit is issued, or a request for an extension is received by the City prior to the expiration of the VTSM and approved by the Planning Commission.

4. The applicant and/or outside party have the right to appeal, within 10 days, any decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council per the provisions contained in the Waterford Municipal Code.

Conditions of Approval
Planning Department

1. Prior to the issuance of a Final Map, the applicant shall demonstrate conformance to the following conditions to the satisfaction of the Planning Department and Public Works Department: The applicant shall respond in writing to all conditions contained in this document and its attachments. Responses shall describe how the condition has been met and shall; where applicable, direct the plan checker to the page and/or drawing detail that demonstrates compliance with the condition. A copy of these responses shall be provided with each set of the final Site Plan and improvement plans.

2. Development shall conform to the map designated by the City Planning Department as Exhibit A. Exhibit A shall consist of the submitted map amended by the applicant to reflect any changes indicated above in the Project Specific Conditions or required by the City in the approval process. The applicant shall submit any required amended maps to the Planning Department within 90 days of project approval. Failure to submit the amended map will result in a delay in processing and/or approval of the final map.

3. The development impact fees and project processing fees due in connection with this project shall be based upon the fees in effect at the time the fee is paid unless modified by a Development Agreement or other mechanism approved by the City. All developers of property within this project site shall pay the appropriate City Capital Facilities Fees and County Public Facilities Fees, Waterford Unified School District fees, and any other applicable fees in place. These fees may be adjusted annually based on the construction cost index or other method as approved by the City.

4. The Planning Department may approve minor amendments to the permit, provided that the permit is still in substantial conformance with the original approval. A request for a minor amendment shall be submitted in writing to the Planning Department.

5. Approval of this VTSM shall not be valid until such time the Waterford City Council has approved an Ordinance rezoning the Project site from RS to PC 2024-01.

6. Any plans associated with the permit shall be in substantial conformance to the approved site plan and the development shall be consistent with the applicable sections of the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Specific Plan (if applicable). Violation of any provision(s) may RES 2024-43
result in Code Enforcement action, which may include revocation of permit and/or monetary penalties.

7. All signage shall be consistent with the standards and guidelines established in Chapter 17.60 of the Waterford Municipal Code. If applicable, a sign permit shall be obtained from the Planning Department prior to the construction of any project signage if said permit was not obtained with the original project approval.

8. Roadway stub located at Street A shall include bollards and/or other barriers as reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.

9. The final map shall be in substantial compliance to the approved VTSM 2024-01 and the development shall be consistent with applicable section of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.

10. Prior to the approval and recordation of the Project’s Final Map, the applicant shall annex the Project into Community Facilities District No. 2019-01.

11. Consistent with the development standards of Planning Community (PC) No. 2024-01, lots developed within the Project shall contain the following development standards:

Development Standard PC 2024-01
Lot Dimensions
Lot Size (Minimum) 3,500 square feet
Lot Width (Minimum) Interior – 45 feet
Corner – 45 feet
Lot Coverage (Maximum) 55%
Setbacks (Minimum)
Front 15 feet
Rear 8 feet
Side Interior – 4 feet
Corner – (Street Side) – 10 feet
Interior Corner – 4 feet

12. The developer shall enter into a subdivision improvement agreement prior to the recordation of the final map. The subdivision improvement agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and Waterford City Council prior to the recordation and acceptance of the Final Map.

13. The developer will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, employees and volunteers from and against all claims, lawsuits or causes of action (whether brought solely against the City or jointly against both City, developer, or others), damages, losses, and expenses, including attorney fees, arising in any manner out of the approval or the application approved herein, including, without limitation, all actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul the permit granted pursuant to the City’s approval of the application referenced herein, provided the City notifies the developer within a reasonable RES 2024-43
time of any such claim, action or proceeding, and cooperates in the defense of such claims, actions or proceedings.

Building Department

1. Approval of the VTSM 2024-01 is not an authorization to commence construction. Building construction, alterations, repairs, sign erection, or occupancy shall not be permitted without prior approval of the Building Department through issuance of any required permits.

2. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall provide written proof that the applicable Waterford School District fees have been paid.

3. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall pay the applicable Stanislaus County Public Facilities Fee.

4. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall pay the applicable Stanislaus Consolidated Fire Protection District Capital Facilities Fee.

5. All construction shall meet the requirements of the currently adopted California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical, and Energy Codes, as well as all Administrative, Residential and Green Building referenced standards.

6. A sprinkler system shall be required for any construction. The applicant shall mark the location of fire walls on the exterior of the building in a manner approved by the Building Department.

7. The applicant shall provide on-site restroom facilities during construction.

Public Works/Engineering

1. Improvement Plans prepared by a registered civil engineer shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. All required structures such as walls, fences, drainage facilities, water mains, sewer lines and streetlights shall be shown on the plans along with curb, gutter, sidewalk, edge of pavement and utilities. All existing structures not shown on the tentative map or shown as “to be removed” shall be removed prior to the recording of the final map.

2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the City Engineer prior to the start of work at the site. No grade severance to adjacent properties shall be created.

All structures such as walls, fences, drainage facilities, water mains and streetlights shall be shown on the plan.

3. Encroachment permits shall be required for all work within the current and proposed public right-of-way. Any work done in the current and proposed public right-of-way shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to the start of construction. Bonding for those improvements will be required as specified by Public Works/City Engineer.

RES 2024-43

4. Lighting: The lighting system shall be designed to best serve the area and to minimize the length of service runs from the points of connection to the streetlights. All lighting shall be installed according to current City Standards.

5. Cable Television: Cable television facilities including pedestals and junction boxes shall be underground in street right-of-ways or easements with service provided to each lot.

6. Prior to the start of underground work/digging the developer shall contact USA (Underground Service Alert) at 1-800-642-2444.

7. Appropriate dust control shall be provided at the contractor’s expense to minimize any dust nuisance and shall be in accordance with Section 10 of Caltrans standard specifications.

8. The developer shall be responsible for all work performed by contractors or subcontractors.

9. The contractor shall provide all lights, signs, barricades, flagmen or other devices necessary for public safety in accordance with the current issue of “Manual of Traffic Controls, Warning Signs, Lights and Devices for Use in Performance of Work Upon Highways,” published by the State of California Business and Transportation Agency.

10. Materials testing required by the City Engineer for work shall be provided by the Developer and submitted to the City Engineer for approval. All costs associated with material testing shall be at the Developer’s expense.

11. Prior to final acceptance of the improvements, the developer shall provide a set of “as-built” drawings to the City Engineer. These drawings shall be in black ink on Mylar, meeting the requirements of Sections 66434 of the Subdivision Map Act.

12. Developer shall remove all septic tanks and abandon existing water wells to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Streets:

13. Public streets shall be built to City of Waterford Standards in accordance with Waterford Municipal Codes Title 16 and Title 17 and the Waterford General Plan.

14. Through review of the project’s Improvement Plans, the City Engineer and developer shall establish and agree upon the project’s area of impact, specifically related to the project’s construction impacts o Tim Bell Road via the connection and installation of underground improvements. Construction impacts to these roadways shall be mitigated by the developer via overlay improvements on said roadways. The scope of these impacts and overlay improvements shall be defined in the project’s Improvement Plans and Subdivision Improvement Agreement.

RES 2024-43

15. A ten (10) foot wide Public Utility Easement shall be provided on all street frontages within the development.

16. Curbs, gutters and sidewalks shall be constructed and/or repaired in accordance with the City Standards and the requirements of Title 16 of the Waterford Municipal Code.

17. Street survey monuments and covers shall be placed on the centerline of each street at all intersections, beginnings and ends of curves, changes of direction, and other locations as directed by the City Engineer.

18. Curb ramps shall be constructed at all intersections and shall comply with Section 2-7103 in the current edition of the State Building Code and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

19. The developer shall be responsible for obtaining soil R-value tests, specifically supervised by the City Engineer, in sufficient quantity to establish the quality of the soil and a basis for the preliminary structural section.

Water:

20. Individual water services shall be provided to each parcel from the public water main in all public streets.

21. Provide a looped water system, a minimum of two connections to the City water system are required throughout all phases.

22. Provide locations of all water valves and fire hydrants within the development. All water valves and fire hydrants shall have a maximum spacing in accordance with the current City Design Standards.

Sanitary Sewer:

23. A sewer service shall be installed by the developer to each lot and shall be sized to carry the quantity of sewage which will be discharged from the service area with a minimum design flow of 300 gallons/day plus infiltration. For the purpose of sewer capacity calculations, a peaking factor of 2.5 shall be used. All sewer laterals shall have a minimum cover of 3 feet, 6 inches from the top of the pipe to finished grade at center line. Sewers within 100 feet of domestic wells shall be cast iron or ductile iron. All sewer mains shall extend to the center of property frontage. Sewer mains shall be designed according to current City Standards.

24. Single family residential properties shall be served by 4-inch sewer service laterals. Other uses such as commercial and multi-family residential uses shall install laterals according to City Standard and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

RES 2024-43
Storm Drainage:

25. Project design and construction shall be in compliance with the State Water Resources Control Board’s Phase II MS4 permit.

26. All storm drainage improvements shall be designed in accordance with the design criteria set forth in Chapter 4 of the Stanislaus County Standards and Specifications.

27. All storm drainage improvements shall be tied into existing storm drain lines. The engineer shall provide calculations to verify downstream capacity. In the event that downstream improvements are required, the developer shall construct all necessary improvements or contribute this project’s fair share of improvements.

Modesto Irrigation District:

1. The Developer and/or Project Proponent shall install a two (2) foot tall CMU wall with thirty-two (32) inch vinyl coated chain link fence located on top of the CMU wall from Tim Bell Road to Lot 30. From the western edge of Lot 30 to the eastern edge of Lot 21, a six (6) foot tall CMU wall shall be installed.

2. With the exception of Condition No. 1, above, the Developer and/or Project Proponent shall comply with the Modesto Irrigation District letter, dated March 4, 2024. A copy of this letter can be obtained from the City’s Planning Department.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District:

1. The Developer and/or Project Proponent shall comply with the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District letter, dated March 4, 2024. A copy of said letter can be obtained from the City’s Planning Department.

CEQA Mitigation Measures:

1. The Developer and/or Project Proponent shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program (MMRP), dated July 2024, prepared for the Waterstone Residential Subdivisions Mitigated Negative Declaration. A copy of the MMRP is on file with the Waterford Planning Department.

The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Waterford, Stanislaus County, at a regular meeting held on September 5, 2024, moved for adoption by Council Member ________ and duly seconded by Council Member _________; passed by the following roll call vote:

RES 2024-43
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

CITY OF WATEFORD
______________________________
Charlie Goeken, Mayor
APPROVE AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
Corbett J. Browning, City Attorney
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Patricia Krause, CMC, City Clerk
RES 2024-43
Exhibit A – VTSM 2024-01
RES 2024-43
DRAWN BY:

DATE:SCALE:DWG:CHECKED:

SHEET
OF

REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION BY
JOB #:

DRAWN BY:

DATE:SCALE:DWG:CHECKED:

SHEET
OF

REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION BY
JOB #:
0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
1 Street Scene
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials
And Application May Vary.

Plan 3 Cottage Plan 1 Farmhouse Plan 2 Traditional
0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials 2 And Application May Vary.Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials And Application May Vary.
0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
3 30 SC 68
2668 2668
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2468
2868
21068
2468
5068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
28 SC
68 2868
21068
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
4040 SL
5040 SL
2040 SH
2068
20'-0" x 21'-0"
2 Bay Garage

KITCHEN
10'-6" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM 2
10'-6" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 3
12'-8" x 12'-3"
PRIM. BEDROOM
13'-8" x 16'-2"
LIVING
9'-0" x 7'-2"
DINING
SERV.

PRIM.

BA.

C.

LINEN
COV.

ENTRY
ENTRY
BA. 2
W.
45'
90'
11'-01
2 "
36'-0"
4'-10" 20'-11
2 "
48'-6"
2'-0" 46'-6"
21'-7" 3'-0" 9'-5" 12'-6"
36'-0"
22'-91
2 " 13'-21
2 "
48'-6"
11'-7" 2'-0" 5'-7" 2'-0" 10'-7" 16'-9"
OPT.

ISLAND
18'-0"
20'-0"
23'-6"
CHS
CHS
4'-0" 5'-0"
5040 SL
OPT.

W D
6040 SL
CHS
CHS
C HS
C HS

1.2.0 1,224 SF
3 Bdrm|2 Bath
Covered Entry - 32 SF
2-Bay Garage - 450 SF
8' Plate

WATERSTONE

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16

FLOOR PLAN
Plan 1 | Traditional
P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_1.2.0.dwg, 1/22/2024 2:14:54 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 30 SC 68
2668 2668
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2468
2868
21068
2468
5068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
28 SC
68 2868
21068
6860 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
6860 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
4040 SL
5040 SL
2040 SH
2068
20'-0" x 21'-0"
2 Bay Garage

KITCHEN
10'-6" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM 2
10'-6" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 3
12'-8" x 12'-3"
PRIM. BEDROOM
13'-8" x 16'-2"
LIVING
9'-0" x 7'-2"
DINING
SERV.

PRIM.

BA.

C.

LINEN
COV.

ENTRY
ENTRY
BA. 2
W.
45'
90'
11'-01
2 "
36'-0"
4'-10" 20'-11
2 "
48'-6"
2'-0" 46'-6"
21'-7" 3'-0" 9'-5" 12'-6"
36'-0"
22'-91
2 " 13'-21
2 "
48'-6"
11'-7" 2'-0" 5'-7" 2'-0" 10'-7" 16'-9"
OPT.

ISLAND
18'-0"
20'-0"
23'-6"
CHS
CHS
4'-0" 5'-0"
5040 SL
OPT.

W D
6040 SL
CHS
CHS
C HS
C HS

1.2.0 1,224 SF
3 Bdrm|2 Bath
Covered Entry - 32 SF
2-Bay Garage - 450 SF
8' Plate

WATERSTONE

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16

FLOOR PLAN
Plan 1 | Traditional
P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_1.2.0.dwg, 1/22/2024 2:14:54 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials 4 And Application May Vary. 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
5 30 SC 68
2668 2668
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2468
2868
21068
2468
5068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
28 SC
68 2868
21068
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
4040 SL
5040 SL
2040 SH
2068
20'-0" x 21'-0"
2 Bay Garage

KITCHEN
10'-6" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM 2
10'-6" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 3
12'-8" x 12'-3"
PRIM. BEDROOM
13'-8" x 16'-2"
LIVING
9'-0" x 7'-2"
DINING
SERV.

PRIM.

BA.

C.

LINEN
COV.

ENTRY
ENTRY
BA. 2
W.
45'
90'
11'-01
2 "
36'-0"
4'-10" 20'-112
"
48'-6"
2'-0" 46'-6"
21'-7" 3'-0" 9'-5" 12'-6"
36'-0"
22'-91
2 " 13'-21
2 "
48'-6"
11'-7" 2'-0" 5'-7" 2'-0" 10'-7" 16'-9"
OPT.

ISLAND
18'-0"
20'-0"
23'-6"
CHS
CHS
4'-0" 5'-0"
5040 SL
OPT.

W D
6040 SL
CHS
CHS
C HS
C HS

1.4.0 Plan 1 | Farmhouse

WATERSTONE

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
1,228 SF
3 Bdrm|2 Bath
Covered Entry - 32 SF
2-Bay Garage - 447 SF
8' Plate

FLOOR PLAN
1,228 SF
3 Bdrm|2 Bath
Covered Entry - 32 SF
2-Bay Garage - 447 SF
8' Plate

FLOOR PLAN
P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_1.4.0.dwg, 1/22/2024 5:27:18 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials 6 And Application May Vary. 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
7 30 SC 68
2668 2668
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2468
2868
21068
2468
5068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
28 SC
68 2868
21068
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
4040 SL
2040 SH
2068
20'-0" x 21'-0"
2 Bay Garage

KITCHEN
10'-6" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM 2
10'-6" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 3
12'-8" x 12'-3"
PRIM. BEDROOM
13'-8" x 16'-2"
LIVING
9'-0" x 7'-2"
DINING
SERV.

PRIM.

BA.

C.

LINEN
COV.

ENTRY
ENTRY
BA. 2
W.
45'
90'
36'-0"
4'-10" 20'-112
"
48'-6"
2'-0" 46'-6"
21'-7" 3'-0" 9'-5" 12'-6"
36'-0"
22'-91
2 " 13'-21
2 "
48'-6"
11'-7" 2'-0" 5'-7" 2'-0" 10'-7" 16'-9"
OPT.

ISLAND
20'-0"
23'-6"
CHS
CHS
4'-0" 5'-0"
5040 SL
OPT.

W D
6040 SL
CHS
CHS
C HS
C HS
5040 SL
11'-01
2 "
36'-0"

1.5.0 Plan 1 | Cottage

WATERSTONE

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
1,228 SF
3 Bdrm|2 Bath
Covered Entry - 32 SF
2-Bay Garage - 447 SF
8' Plate

FLOOR PLAN
P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_1.5.0.dwg, 1/22/2024 5:27:23 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials 8 And Application May Vary. 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
9 RIDGE
RIDGE
VALLEY
4:12
VALLEY
4:12
4:124:12
RIDGE
RIDGE
HIP
4:12
HIP
4:12
4:12
4:124:12
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
VALLEY
4:12
RIDGE
RIDGE
VALLEY
4:12
VALLEY
4:12
4:124:12
PLAN 1
Roof Plans
Plan 1 | Traditional Plan 1 | Farmhouse Plan 1 | Cottage Eave 12" / Rake 6"

WATERSTONE

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16

1.6.0 Eave 12" / Rake 6" Eave 12" / Rake 6"
P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_1.6.0.dwg, 1/22/2024 2:15:47 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
10 Plan 2
Plan 2 Plan 2
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials
And Application May Vary.
0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
11 15'-0"20'-0"
5068 BI-PASS
4'-0"
30 SC 68
68 210
5040 SL
4040 SL
15'-0"
5'-0"
2468
21068
2668
2868
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2868
2668
2068
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
2468
2040 SH
2868
4040 SH
36'-0"
15'-101
2 " 20'-11
2 "
60'-0"
5'-0" 55'-0"
36'-0"
21'-6" 14'-6"
60'-0"
26'-9" 10'-7" 2'-0" 5'-7" 3'-6" 11'-7"
10'-9" 5'-11
2 "
20'-7" 10'-0" 11'-10" 12'-7"
45'
90'
20'-0" x 22'-11"
2 Bay Garage

KITCHEN
10'-2" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM 2
10'-2" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 3
14'-3" x 12'-0"

PRIMARY BEDROOM
13'-0" x 17'-0"
LIVING 8'-0" x 16'-0"
DINING
SERV.

OPT. BEDROOM 4
PRIM.

BA.

COATS
BA. 2
W.

W.
14'-3" x 7'-5"

STORAGE
COV.

ENTRY
ENTRY
2468
2668
OPT.
5040 SL
2068
CHS
C HS
C HS
C HS
C HS
CHS
W D
6040 SL
LINEN
LOW
LINEN
OPT.

ISLAND
W.
11'-11" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 4
5040 SL
BI-PASS 5068
2668
2068
SERV.

C. LINEN
2068
2868
2 WATERSTONE 2.2.0

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
1,440 SF
3 Bdrm|2 Bath|Opt. Bd. 4
Covered Entry - 42 SF
2-Bay Garage - 569 SF
8' Plate

FLOOR PLAN
Plan 2 | Traditional
OPT. BEDROOM 4
(+150 SQ.FT.)
P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_2.2.0.dwg, 1/22/2024 5:27:26 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 15'-0"20'-0"
5068 BI-PASS
4'-0"
30 SC 68
68 210
5040 SL
4040 SL
15'-0"
5'-0"
2468
21068
2668
2868
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2868
2668
2068
6860 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
6860 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
2468
2040 SH
2868
4040 SH
36'-0"
15'-101
2 " 20'-11
2 "
60'-0"
5'-0" 55'-0"
36'-0"
21'-6" 14'-6"
60'-0"
26'-9" 10'-7" 2'-0" 5'-7" 3'-6" 11'-7"
10'-9" 5'-11
2 "
20'-7" 10'-0" 11'-10" 12'-7"
45'
90'
20'-0" x 22'-11"
2 Bay Garage

KITCHEN
10'-2" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM 2
10'-2" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 3
14'-3" x 12'-0"

PRIMARY BEDROOM
13'-0" x 17'-0"
LIVING 8'-0" x 16'-0"
DINING
SERV.

OPT. BEDROOM 4
PRIM.

BA.

COATS
BA. 2
W.

W.
14'-3" x 7'-5"

STORAGE
COV.

ENTRY
ENTRY
2468
2668
OPT.
5040 SL
2068
CHS
C HS
C HS
C HS
C HS
CHS
W D
6040 SL
LINEN
LOW
LINEN
OPT.

ISLAND
W.
11'-11" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 4
5040 SL
BI-PASS 5068
2668
2068
SERV.

C. LINEN
2068
2868
2 WATERSTONE 2.2.0

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
1,440 SF
3 Bdrm|2 Bath|Opt. Bd. 4
Covered Entry - 42 SF
2-Bay Garage - 569 SF
8' Plate

FLOOR PLAN
Plan 2 | Traditional
OPT. BEDROOM 4
(+150 SQ.FT.)
P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_2.2.0.dwg, 1/22/2024 5:27:26 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials 12 And Application May Vary. 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
13 15'-0"
20'-0"
5068 BI-PASS
4'-0"
30 SC 68
68 210
5040 SL
4040 SL
15'-0"
5'-0"
2468
21068
2668
2868
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2868
2668
2068
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
2468
2040 SH
2868
4040 SH
36'-0"
15'-101
2 " 20'-11
2 "
60'-0"
5'-0" 55'-0"
36'-0"
21'-6" 14'-6"
60'-0"
26'-9" 10'-7" 2'-0" 5'-7" 3'-6" 11'-7"
10'-9" 5'-11
2 "
20'-7" 10'-0" 11'-10" 12'-7"
45'
90'
20'-0" x 22'-11"
2 Bay Garage

KITCHEN
10'-2" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM 2
10'-2" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 3
14'-3" x 12'-0"

PRIMARY BEDROOM
13'-0" x 17'-0"
LIVING 8'-0" x 16'-0"
DINING
SERV.

OPT. BEDROOM 4
PRIM.

BA.

COATS
BA. 2
W.

W.
14'-3" x 7'-5"

STORAGE
COV.

ENTRY
ENTRY
2468
2668
OPT.
5040 SL
2068
CHS
C HS
C HS
C HS
C HS
CHS
W D
6040 SL
LINEN
LOW
LINEN
OPT.

ISLAND
WATERSTONE 2.4.0

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
1,440 SF
3 Bdrm|2 Bath|Opt. Bd. 4
Covered Entry - 42 SF
2-Bay Garage - 569 SF
8' Plate

FLOOR PLAN
Plan 2 | Farmhouse
P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_2.4.0.dwg, 1/22/2024 5:27:35 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 15'-0"
20'-0"
5068 BI-PASS
4'-0"
30 SC 68
68 210
5040 SL
4040 SL
15'-0"
5'-0"
2468
21068
2668
2868
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2868
2668
2068
6860 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
6860 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
2468
2040 SH
2868
4040 SH
36'-0"
15'-101
2 " 20'-11
2 "
60'-0"
5'-0" 55'-0"
36'-0"
21'-6" 14'-6"
60'-0"
26'-9" 10'-7" 2'-0" 5'-7" 3'-6" 11'-7"
10'-9" 5'-11
2 "
20'-7" 10'-0" 11'-10" 12'-7"
45'
90'
20'-0" x 22'-11"
2 Bay Garage

KITCHEN
10'-2" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM 2
10'-2" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 3
14'-3" x 12'-0"

PRIMARY BEDROOM
13'-0" x 17'-0"
LIVING 8'-0" x 16'-0"
DINING
SERV.

OPT. BEDROOM 4
PRIM.

BA.

COATS
BA. 2
W.

W.
14'-3" x 7'-5"

STORAGE
COV.

ENTRY
ENTRY
2468
2668
OPT.
5040 SL
2068
CHS
C HS
C HS
C HS
C HS
CHS
W D
6040 SL
LINEN
LOW
LINEN
OPT.

ISLAND
WATERSTONE 2.4.0

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
1,440 SF
3 Bdrm|2 Bath|Opt. Bd. 4
Covered Entry - 42 SF
2-Bay Garage - 569 SF
8' Plate

FLOOR PLAN
Plan 2 | Farmhouse
P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_2.4.0.dwg, 1/22/2024 5:27:35 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials 14 And Application May Vary. 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
15 15'-0"
20'-0"
5068 BI-PASS
4'-0"
30 SC 68
68 210
4040 SL
15'-0"
5'-0"
2468
21068
2668
2868
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2868
2668
2068
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
2468
2040 SH
2868
4040 SH
36'-0"
1 2
" 20'-11
2 "
60'-0"
5'-0" 55'-0"
36'-0"
21'-6" 14'-6"
60'-0"
26'-9" 10'-7" 2'-0" 5'-7" 3'-6" 11'-7"
5'-11
2 "
20'-7" 10'-0" 11'-10" 12'-7"
45'
90'
20'-0" x 22'-11"
2 Bay Garage

KITCHEN
10'-2" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM 2
10'-2" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 3
14'-3" x 12'-0"

PRIMARY BEDROOM
13'-0" x 17'-0"
LIVING 8'-0" x 16'-0"
DINING
SERV.

OPT. BEDROOM 4
PRIM.

BA.

COATS
BA. 2
W.

W.
14'-3" x 7'-5"

STORAGE
COV.

ENTRY
ENTRY
2468
2668
OPT.
5040 SL
2068
CHS
C HS
C HS
C HS
C HS
CHS
W D
6040 SL
LINEN
LOW
LINEN
OPT.

ISLAND
10'-9"
36'-0"
5040 SL
15'-101
2 "
WATERSTONE 2.5.0

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
1,440 SF
3 Bdrm|2 Bath|Opt. Bd. 4
Covered Entry - 42 SF
2-Bay Garage - 569 SF
8' Plate

FLOOR PLAN
Plan 2 | Cottage
P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_2.5.0.dwg, 1/22/2024 5:27:40 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 15'-0"
20'-0"
5068 BI-PASS
4'-0"
30 SC 68
68 210
4040 SL
15'-0"
5'-0"
2468
21068
2668
2868
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2868
2668
2068
6860 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
6860 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
2468
2040 SH
2868
4040 SH
36'-0"
1 2
" 20'-11
2 "
60'-0"
5'-0" 55'-0"
36'-0"
21'-6" 14'-6"
60'-0"
26'-9" 10'-7" 2'-0" 5'-7" 3'-6" 11'-7"
5'-11
2 "
20'-7" 10'-0" 11'-10" 12'-7"
45'
90'
20'-0" x 22'-11"
2 Bay Garage

KITCHEN
10'-2" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM 2
10'-2" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 3
14'-3" x 12'-0"

PRIMARY BEDROOM
13'-0" x 17'-0"
LIVING 8'-0" x 16'-0"
DINING
SERV.

OPT. BEDROOM 4
PRIM.

BA.

COATS
BA. 2
W.

W.
14'-3" x 7'-5"

STORAGE
COV.

ENTRY
ENTRY
2468
2668
OPT.
5040 SL
2068
CHS
C HS
C HS
C HS
C HS
CHS
W D
6040 SL
LINEN
LOW
LINEN
OPT.

ISLAND
10'-9"
36'-0"
5040 SL
15'-101
2 "
WATERSTONE 2.5.0

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
1,440 SF
3 Bdrm|2 Bath|Opt. Bd. 4
Covered Entry - 42 SF
2-Bay Garage - 569 SF
8' Plate

FLOOR PLAN
Plan 2 | Cottage
P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_2.5.0.dwg, 1/22/2024 5:27:40 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials 16 And Application May Vary. 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
17 RIDGE
RIDGE
4:12
VALLEY
4:12
4:12
4:124:12
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
RIDGE
RIDGE
4:12
VALLEY
4:12
4:12
4:124:12
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
4:12
RIDGE
RIDGE
4:12
4:124:12
PLAN 2
Roof Plans
Plan 2 | Traditional Plan 2 | Farmhouse Plan 2 | Cottage Eave 12" / Rake 6"

WATERSTONE

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
Eave 12" / Rake 6" Eave 12" / Rake 6"

2.6.0 P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_2.6.0.dwg, 1/22/2024 2:16:51 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials 18 And Application May Vary. 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
19 30 SC 68
5'-6" 5'-6"
2868
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2868
45'
90'
20'-0"
FX
TEMP. GL.
2040
TEMP. GL.
2040 SH
2468
UP
15R
2468
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
20'-0" x 22'-7"
2 Bay Garage
KITCHEN 20'-4" 13'-9" x
LIVING
13'-2" 8'-4"
x
DINING
C.

COV. ENTRY
PDR.

ENTRY
34'-0"
13'-5" 20'-7"
42'-9"42'-9"
4'-91
2 "
5'-0" 32'-111
2 "
34'-0"
13'-81
2 " 20'-31
2 "
23'-1" 14'-4" 5'-4"
5'-9" 7'-7" 19'-71
2 "
27'-3"
32'-7"
PANTRY
6040 SL
CHS
CHS
CHS
6040 SL
9'-10" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 3
10'-0" x 10'-6"
BEDROOM 4
4040 FX
2668
5068 BI-PASS
2040 SH 21068
21068
2468
2868
2668
DN
15R
5068 BI-PASS
2468
2668
4040 SL
4040 SL
4040 SL
5068 BI-PASS
2040 SH
5040 SL
FX 4040
10'-2" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 2
14'-0" x 14'-0"

PRIMARY BEDROOM
SERV. BA. 2
W.

PRIM.

BA.

TECH. L.
34'-0"
34'-0"
37'-5"37'-5"
13'-5" 10'-51
2 " 10'-11
2 "
1'-0" 10'-5" 2'-0" 11'-5" 2'-0" 10'-7"
11'-1" 2'-0" 2'-2" 7'-7"
14'-51
2 " 3'-6" 5'-7" 10'-51
2 "

CHS C HS
C HS
D
W
14'-7"
OPT.2668
2868
5068 BI-PASS
2468
4040 SL
4040 SL
5068 BI-PASS
SERV. BA. 2

CHS C HS
D
W
TECH.

L.

LINEN
2668
20'-0" x 10'-6"

BUNK ROOM
WATERSTONE 3.2.0

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
1,730 SF
4 Bdrm|2.5 Bath|
Opt. Bunkroom |
Covered Entry - 64 SF
2-Bay Garage - 471 SF
8' Lower Plate
8' Upper Plate

FLOOR PLAN
Plan 3 | Traditional
SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - 988 SQ.FT. FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - 742 SQ.FT.

OPT. BUNKROOM
(@ BED 3 & BED 4)
P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_3.2.0.dwg, 1/23/2024 3:40:43 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 30 SC 68
5'-6" 5'-6"
2868
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2868
45'
90'
20'-0"
FX
TEMP. GL.
2040
TEMP. GL.
2040 SH
2468
UP
15R
2468
6860 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
20'-0" x 22'-7"
2 Bay Garage
KITCHEN 20'-4" 13'-9" x
LIVING
13'-2" 8'-4"
x
DINING
C.

COV. ENTRY
PDR.

ENTRY
34'-0"
13'-5" 20'-7"
42'-9"42'-9"
4'-91
2 "
5'-0" 32'-111
2 "
34'-0"
13'-81
2 " 20'-31
2 "
23'-1" 14'-4" 5'-4"
5'-9" 7'-7" 19'-71
2 "
27'-3"
32'-7"
PANTRY
6040 SL
CHS
CHS
CHS
6040 SL
9'-10" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 3
10'-0" x 10'-6"
BEDROOM 4
4040 FX
2668
5068 BI-PASS
2040 SH 21068
21068
2468
2868
2668
DN
15R
5068 BI-PASS
2468
2668
4040 SL
4040 SL
4040 SL
5068 BI-PASS
2040 SH
5040 SL
FX 4040
10'-2" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 2
14'-0" x 14'-0"

PRIMARY BEDROOM
SERV. BA. 2
W.

PRIM.

BA.

TECH. L.
34'-0"
34'-0"
37'-5"37'-5"
13'-5" 10'-51
2 " 10'-11
2 "
1'-0" 10'-5" 2'-0" 11'-5" 2'-0" 10'-7"
11'-1" 2'-0" 2'-2" 7'-7"
14'-51
2 " 3'-6" 5'-7" 10'-51
2 "

CHS C HS
C HS
D
W
14'-7"
OPT.2668
2868
5068 BI-PASS
2468
4040 SL
4040 SL
5068 BI-PASS
SERV. BA. 2

CHS C HS
D
W
TECH.

L.

LINEN
2668
20'-0" x 10'-6"

BUNK ROOM
WATERSTONE 3.2.0

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
1,730 SF
4 Bdrm|2.5 Bath|
Opt. Bunkroom |
Covered Entry - 64 SF
2-Bay Garage - 471 SF
8' Lower Plate
8' Upper Plate

FLOOR PLAN
Plan 3 | Traditional
SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - 988 SQ.FT. FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - 742 SQ.FT.

OPT. BUNKROOM
(@ BED 3 & BED 4)
P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_3.2.0.dwg, 1/23/2024 3:40:43 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials 20 And Application May Vary. 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
21 30 SC 68
5'-6" 5'-6"
2868
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2868
45'
90'
20'-0"
FX
TEMP. GL.
2040
TEMP. GL.
2040 SH
2468
UP
15R
2468
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
20'-0" x 22'-7"
2 Bay Garage
KITCHEN 20'-4" 13'-9" x
LIVING
13'-2" 8'-4"
x
DINING
C.

COV. ENTRY
PDR.

ENTRY
34'-0"
13'-5" 20'-7"
42'-9"42'-9"
4'-91
2 "
5'-0" 32'-111
2 "
34'-0"
13'-81
2 " 20'-31
2 "
23'-1" 14'-4" 5'-4"
5'-9" 7'-7" 19'-71
2 "
27'-3"
32'-7"
PANTRY
6040 SL
CHS
CHS
CHS
6040 SL
9'-10" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 3
10'-0" x 10'-6"
BEDROOM 4
4040 FX
2668
5068 BI-PASS
2040 SH 21068
21068
2468
2868
2668
DN
15R
5068 BI-PASS
2468
2668
4040 SL
4040 SL
4040 SL
5068 BI-PASS
2040 SH
5040 SL
FX 4040
10'-2" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 2
14'-0" x 14'-0"

PRIMARY BEDROOM
SERV. BA. 2
W.

PRIM.

BA.

TECH. L.
34'-0"
34'-0"
37'-5"37'-5"
13'-5" 10'-512
" 10'-11
2 "
1'-0" 10'-5" 2'-0" 11'-5" 2'-0" 10'-7"
11'-1" 2'-0" 2'-2" 7'-7"
14'-51
2 " 3'-6" 5'-7" 10'-51
2 "

CHS C HS
C HS
D
W
14'-7"
OPT.2668

3.4.0 Plan 3 | Farmhouse

WATERSTONE

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16

FLOOR PLAN
1,730 SF
4 Bdrm|2.5 Bath|
Opt. Bunkroom |
Covered Entry - 64 SF
2-Bay Garage - 471 SF
8' Lower Plate
8' Upper Plate
SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - 988 SQ.FT. FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - 742 SQ.FT.

P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_3.4.0.dwg, 1/23/2024 3:40:26 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials 22 And Application May Vary. 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
23 30 SC 68
5'-6" 5'-6"
2868
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
2868
45'
90'
20'-0"
FX
TEMP. GL.
2040
TEMP. GL.
2040 SH
2468
UP
15R
2468
6068 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
20'-0" x 22'-7"
2 Bay Garage
KITCHEN 20'-4" 13'-9" x
LIVING
13'-2" 8'-4"
x
DINING
C.

COV. ENTRY
PDR.

ENTRY
34'-0"
13'-5" 20'-7"
42'-9"42'-9"
4'-91
2 "
5'-0" 32'-111
2 "
34'-0"
13'-81
2 " 20'-31
2 "
23'-1" 14'-4" 5'-4"
5'-9" 7'-7" 19'-71
2 "
27'-3"
32'-7"
PANTRY
6040 SL
CHS
CHS
CHS
6040 SL
9'-10" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 3
10'-0" x 10'-6"
BEDROOM 4
4040 FX
2668
5068 BI-PASS
2040 SH 21068
21068
2468
2868
2668
DN
15R
5068 BI-PASS
2468
2668
4040 SL
4040 SL
5068 BI-PASS
2040 SH
5040 SL
FX 4040
10'-2" x 10'-0"
BEDROOM 2
14'-0" x 14'-0"

PRIMARY BEDROOM
SERV. BA. 2
W.

PRIM.

BA.

TECH. L.
34'-0"
34'-0"
37'-5"37'-5"
13'-5" 10'-512
" 10'-11
2 "
1'-0" 10'-5" 2'-0" 11'-5" 2'-0" 10'-7"
11'-1" 2'-0" 2'-2" 7'-7"
14'-51
2 " 3'-6" 5'-7" 10'-51
2 "

CHS C HS
C HS
D
W
14'-7"
OPT.2668
5040 SL

3.5.0 Plan 3 | Cottage

WATERSTONE

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16

FLOOR PLAN
1,730 SF
4 Bdrm|2.5 Bath|
Opt. Bunkroom |
Covered Entry - 64 SF
2-Bay Garage - 471 SF
8' Lower Plate
8' Upper Plate
SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - 988 SQ.FT. FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - 742 SQ.FT.

P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_3.5.0.dwg, 1/23/2024 3:40:35 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials 24 And Application May Vary. 0 2 4 8
© 2023 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2023360 | 01-23-24

WATERSTONE
WATERFORD, CA ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA . SACRAMENTO

DESIGN SUBMITTAL
25 RIDGE
4:12
4:12
4:12
VALLEY
H
HIP 4:12

3.5:12

3.5:12
4:12
RIDGE
R
RIDGE
4:12
4:12
4:12
VALLEY
H
HIP 4:12

3.5:12
RIDGE
R
HIP
HIP
4:12
4:12
4:12
HIP
VALLEY
HIP
HIP
HIP 4:12

3.5:12
RIDGE
4:12
4:12
4:12
VALLEY
H
HIP 4:12

3.5:12

3.5:12
4:12
RIDGE
R
PLAN 3
Roof Plans
Plan 3 | Traditional Plan 3 | Farmhouse Plan 3 | Cottage Eave 12" / Rake 6"

WATERSTONE

MODESTO, CA
C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2023360 | 01-22-24 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0"
0 2 4 8 16
Eave 12" / Rake 6" Eave 12" / Rake 6"

3.6.0 P:\2023\2023360\Single-Family\Design\D_3.6.0.dwg, 1/22/2024 2:18:07 PM, _AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3

General Business 6a
September 5, 2024
Lonnie Statzer Public Works Director
City Council Staff Report
Motion: Approving the “Downtown Flag Decorations” and Authorizing Staff to place the order.

SUMMARY:

The City Council is being asked to approve the “Downtown Flag Decorations” and authorizing staff to place the order.

ANALYSIS:

Council has requested that they would like to see the American Flag Downtown for specific holidays such as, Flag Day, Veterans Day and the Fourth of July. Staff has done some research on how this could be accomplished. Staff has found that there are brackets that can be placed on our decorative light poles Downtown that allows a 2x3’ flag to be placed on a rod and slid into the bracket attached the decorative light poles. Staff is suggesting that 50 brackets and flags will be needed to complete this project.
.FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for this project will come from the General Fund for fiscal year 2024/2025 in the amount of $3,924.69.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This project is categorically exempted according to Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 19 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), in accordance with Section 15301 “Existing Facilities.”
ALTERNATIVES:
• Council could choose to not approve the “Downtown Flags Decorations” and re-direct staff to find different decorations.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Quote
Financing available.

To accept this quotation, sign here and return.
__________________________________________________
Thank you for your business.

Bill To:

City of Waterford
101 E St
Waterford, CA 95386
Lonnie Statzer
Ship To:

City of Waterford
101 E St
Waterford, CA 95386
Lonnie Statzer
Item number Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount FLAG-US-2X3-NYL-PH 2x3' U.S. Flag - Nylon | Pole Hem 50 Each $ 24.00 $ 1,200.00 HW-FLAG-SET-AVE-5-SLV Avenue Flag Hardware Set - Silver | 5' Spinner Pole, Deluxe Avenue Bracket, qty-2 40" Adjustable Banding
Straps
50 Each $ 45.00 $ 2,250.00
FEE-FREIGHT Shipping and Handling 1 Each $ 203.00 $ 203.00 Subtotal $ 3,653.00
Sales Tax $ 271.69
Total $ 3,924.69
6300 W Old Shakopee Rd, Suite 112
Bloomington, MN 55438
Phone 800-328-6195 Fax 952-885-0099
www.displaysales.com
Quote
Estimate SQ-5303
Date 07/19/2024
Customer Account C06565
Customer Contact Lonnie Statzer
Salesperson Kolin Posterick
PO Number
Expiration Date Valid for 30 Days

Terms & Conditions
GRAPHIC ART SERVICE:

Display Sales encourages customers to provide vector-based artwork so that the process of proofing and printing may proceed quickly without interruption. Otherwise, if artwork is unusable, graphic art services will be billed at $125 per hour to correct unusable art, redraw non-formatted art, or design and create custom imagery (per customer request). Alterations are $50 per hour. You will be contacted by one of our Graphic Arts team members and provided a proof. Send your artwork to: [email protected] PRODUCTION TIMEFRAMES:

Normal production time is 14 working days AFTER art proof is approved and down payment is received. Upon approval, rush requests will include a $50 fee.

TERMS:
• 50% down payment on orders for new customers.
• Check or credit card accepted for down payment.
• Balance due Net 20 days after final invoice.
• F.O.B. Display Sales - shipping & handling charges based on destination and size of order. • Financing available for orders greater than $5,000
SHIPPING & FREIGHT RESPONSIBILITY:

FOR ALL SMALL PACKAGE DELIVERIES (UPS, FEDEX, USPS, ETC): All shipments MUST be inspected at the time of delivery. The customer has 48 hours from the time of delivery to notify Display Sales of any shortage or damage to the order. After 48 hours it will be at the discretion of Display Sales to decide how to proceed.

FOR LTL/TRUCKLOAD DELIVERIES:

Any damage or visible loss to your shipment MUST be noted on the delivery receipt (signed by the customer) at the time of delivery. In the event of loss or damage this must be done to file a claim. Display Sales is ineligible to file a claim on behalf of the customer if this is not done and the customer will be responsible for all replacement and/or repair costs Display Sales is not liable for shipments lost, delayed, or damaged in transit. Claims be filed by the purchaser within 10 days to Transit Company. Purchaser is responsible for reviewing merchandise upon receipt to verify order and condition RETURN POLICY:

Returns are accepted within 30 days of delivery (excluding shipping charges). The customer must contact Display Sales for a Return Merchandise Authorization (RMA) number before sending back the items. The customer is responsible for returning the merchandise and all related shipping costs. A restocking fee may apply, up to 25% of the product cost. If there is an issue with the shipment (other than loss or damage) the customer must contact Display Sales within 30 days of receiving the shipment to resolve the issue Returns are NOT accepted for custom or modified merchandise.

WARRANTIES for BANNERS & DECORATIONS:

Display Sales stands behind our products, however, on an occasion an issue may arise with a product. Please contact your sales representative at 800- 328-6195 to discuss the issue and to see the details of warranty coverage. Pictures of the product will be requested before we can fully determine the issue and attempt to resolve. Customer is responsible for the cost of removal, reinstallation and shipping incurred for merchandise being repaired or replaced. Customer participation is required to troubleshoot product issues, which will provide a timely resolution. All issues must be pre-approved by Display Sales for repairs or replacement.

General Business 6b
September 5, 2024
Patricia Krause, City Clerk / Administrative Services Director City Council Staff Report
RESOLUTION: Approving Resolution 2024-41, Adopting the SB 533 Workplave Violence Prevention Policy.

SUMMARY:

City Council is being asked to review and approve City of Waterford Workplave Violence Prevention Policy.

ANALYSIS:

On September 30, 2023, California signed into law Senate Bill No. 553 (SB 553), which requires California employers to establish, implement, and maintain an effective workplace violence prevention plan.

SB 553 requires employers to develop and implement a violence prevention plan specific to their workplace. Training on Workplace Violence Prevention must be conducted when the plan is first implemented, and annually thereafter.

Employers must be prepared to conduct ongoing workplace violence hazard inspections, with such procedures detailed in the plan. Hazard evaluation and inspections must be completed when the plan is first created, after each incident, and whenever the employer is made aware of a new hazard.

In addition to investigating workplace violence incidents, employers must maintain a violent incident log along with other recordkeeping requirements.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the adoption of this policy.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This resolution is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) which is the “Common Sense Exemption” that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment and CEQA does not apply where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Council could choose to not accept the Workplace Violence Prevention policy document. This is not recommended as this policy is required by the State of California per Senate bill No. 553.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Resolution 2024-41
• Exhibit “A” Workplace Violence Prevention Policy
RESOLUTION 2024-41

WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-41
APPROVING RESOLUTION 2024-41, ADOPTING WATERFORD WORKPLACE

VIOLENCE PREVENTION POLICY
WHEREAS; On September 30, 2023, California signed into law Senate Bill No. 553 (SB 553), which requires California employers to establish, implement, and maintain an effective workplace violence prevention plan; and
WHEREAS; SB 553 requires employers to develop and implement a violence prevention plan specific to their workplace. Training on Workplace Violence Prevention must be conducted when the plan is first implemented, and annually thereafter; and WHEREAS; Employers must be prepared to conduct ongoing workplace violence hazard inspections, with such procedures detailed in the plan. Hazard evaluation and inspections must be completed when the plan is first created, after each incident, and whenever the employer is made aware of a new hazard; and
WHEREAS; In addition to investigating workplace violence incidents, employers must maintain a violent incident log along with other recordkeeping requirements.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATERFORD DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Workplace Violence Prevention Policy attached hereto (Exhibit A) is hereby adopted and shall be implemented on an ongoing basis without further action by the City Council.

The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Waterford, County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5 th day of
September 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

CITY OF WATERFORD,
_____________________________
Charlie Goeken, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Patricia Krause, CMC Corbett J. Browning
City Clerk City Attorney

CITY OF WATERFORD

WORKPLACE VIOLENCE PREVENTION POLICY
POLICY IV-13

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Policy ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Responsibility and Authority........................................................................................................... 2 Compliance ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Communication and Training.......................................................................................................... 3 Procedures...................................................................................................................................... 5 Hazard Assessment......................................................................................................................... 6 Hazard Correction........................................................................................................................... 6 Post Incident Response and Investigation...................................................................................... 6 Recordkeeping ................................................................................................................................ 7 Annual Review ................................................................................................................................ 7 Appendices
A. Workplace Violent Incident Log
B. Workplace Violence Prevention Environmental Hazard Assessment & Control Checklist 1 Policy Statement
The City of Waterford is committed to providing a work environment that is free of disruptive, threatening, or violent behavior involving any employee, appointed or elected official, volunteer, contractor, client, and/or visitor. Our policy is to establish, implement, and maintain an effective plan as required by SB 533. The regulation requires us to establish, implement, and maintain, at all times in all our facilities, a workplace violence prevention policy for purposes of protecting employees and other personnel from aggressive and violent behavior at the workplace.

Our Workplace Violence Prevention (WVP) policy is available upon request for examination and copying to our employees, their representatives, and the Chief of Cal/OSHA or his or her designee.

Policy
The City of Waterford will not ignore, condone, or tolerate threats of violence or workplace violence by any employee, appointed or elected official, volunteer, contractor, client, or visitor. • Threats of violence include both verbal and non-verbal conduct that causes a person to fear for his or her safety because there is a reasonable possibility he or she might be physically injured and that serves no legitimate work-related purpose.
• Workplace violence means any act of violence or threat of violence that occurs at the work site.

The term workplace violence shall not include lawful acts of self-defense or defense of others.

Workplace violence includes the following:
– The threat or use of physical force against an employee that results in, or has a high likelihood of resulting in, injury, psychological trauma, or stress, regardless of whether the employee sustains an injury
– An incident involving the threat or use of a firearm or other dangerous weapon, including the use of common objects as weapons, regardless of whether or not the employee sustains an injury
Workplace violence can be categorized into four types:

Type 1: Workplace violence committed by a person who has no legitimate business at the work site - includes violent acts by anyone who enters the workplace with the intent to commit a crime
Type 2: Workplace violence directed at employees by customers, clients, patients, students, inmates, or visitors
Type 3: Workplace violence against an employee by a present or former employee, supervisor, or manager
2 Type 4: Workplace violence committed in the workplace by someone who does not work there but has or is known to have had a personal relationship with an employee In addition, The City of Waterford prohibits all dangerous weapons not used for fire suppression, accident and incident response, emergency medical services, the service of law enforcement, or security duties on all City of Waterford property. Any employee or appointed or elected official in possession of prohibited dangerous weapons on City of Waterford property is in violation of this policy and may be subject to disciplinary action up to and including dismissal. Any volunteer, contractor, client, or visitor in possession of prohibited dangerous weapons will be banned from the premises. Dangerous weapons include any instrument capable of inflicting death or serious bodily injury.

Responsibility and Authority
Workplace Violence Prevention Policy Administrator
The Administrative Services Director/City Clerk, or an assigned designee, is the designated WVP Policy Administrator (Administrator) and has the authority and responsibility for developing, implementing, and maintaining this policy and conducting or overseeing any investigations of workplace violence reports. The Administrative Services Director/City Clerk will also be able to answer employee questions concerning this policy.

The Administrative Services Director/City Clerk, or an assigned designee, shall solicit feedback and input from employees and their authorized representatives in developing and implementing the WVP policy. Active involvement of employees could include, but is not limited to, their participation in identifying, evaluating, and correcting workplace violence hazards; in designing and implementing training; and in reporting and investigating workplace violence incidents.

The Administrative Services Director/City Clerk, or an assigned designee, shall coordinate implementation of the workplace violence prevention policy with other employers (ex. contracted security staff and other employers on site), when applicable, to ensure those employers and their employees understand their respective roles as provided in the policy. These other employers and their staff shall be provided with training on the City of Waterford’s WPV policy.

Managers and Supervisors
Responsibilities include:
• Implementing the policy in their work areas;
• Providing input to the Administrator regarding the policy; • Participating in investigations of workplace violence reports; and • Answering employee questions concerning this policy.

Employees
Responsibilities include:
3 • Complying with the policy;
• Maintaining a violence-free work environment;
• Attending all training;
• Following all directives, policies, and procedures; and • Reporting suspicious persons in the area and alerting the proper authorities when necessary.

Compliance
The Administrator is responsible for ensuring the policy is clearly communicated and understood by all employees. The following techniques are used to ensure all employees understand and comply with the policy:
• Informing all employees of the policy during new employee safety orientation training and ongoing workplace violence prevention training;
• Ensuring all employees, including managers, and supervisors receive training on this policy; • Providing comprehensive workplace violence prevention training to managers and supervisors concerning their roles and responsibilities for policy implementation; • Evaluating employees to ensure their compliance with the policy; • Disciplining employees, appointed or elected officials, and volunteers who engage in threats of violence behaviors up to and including dismissal; and
• Ensuring training of this policy is conducted on a yearly basis.

Communication and Training
Managers and supervisors are responsible for communicating with employees about workplace violence in a form readily understandable by all employees.

Employees are instructed to inform their supervisors about any threats of violence or workplace violence.

Employees may use the Workplace Violent Incident Log (Appendix A) to assist in their reporting of incidents. No employee will be disciplined for reporting any threat they believe to be violence or workplace violence.

After the employee has reported their concerns about any threats of violence or workplace violence to their supervisor, the supervisor will report this information to the Administrator who will investigate the incident. The Administrator will then inform the employee of the results of their investigation and any corrective actions to be taken as part of the City of Waterford’s responsibility in complying with hazard correction measures outlined in the WVP policy.
4 Any employee who believes he or she has the potential of violent behavior is encouraged to use the City of Waterford’s confidential Employee Assistance Program:

SimpleEAP
Main Phone Number: 1.888.425.4800
Text: SUPPORT to 41230
Website: simpleeap.com
Email: [email protected]
Employee training on workplace violence will include:
• This policy;
• Workplace violence risks that employees may encounter in their jobs; • How to recognize the potential for violence and escalating behavior; • Strategies to de-escalate behaviors and to avoid physical harm; • The City of Waterford alerts, alarms, or systems that are in place to warn of emergencies; • How to report incidents to law enforcement; and
• City of Waterford’s EAP
Employees assigned to respond to alerts, alarms, or systems that are in place to warn others will receive additional training that includes:
• General and personal safety measures;
• Aggression and violence predicting factors;
• The assault cycle;
• Characteristics of aggressive and violent persons;
• Verbal intervention and de-escalation techniques and physical maneuvers to defuse and prevent violent behavior;
• Strategies to prevent physical harm;
Training will occur:
• When the policy is first established;
• At time of hire or transfer;
• Annually for employees assigned to respond to internal alerts, alarms, or systems; • When new equipment or work practices are introduced; and • When a new or previously unrecognized workplace violence hazard has been identified Employees who receive training in a form other than live will have the opportunity to meet with a person knowledgeable on the policy within one business day of the training for interactive questions to be 5 answered.

Procedures
Responding to Actual or Potential Workplace Violence Emergencies In the event of an actual or potential workplace violence emergency, the Administrative Services Director/City Clerk will alert employees of the presence, location, and nature of the workplace violence through the following methods:
• Email
• Phone Call
• Text Message
When any employee becomes aware of an actual or potential workplace violence emergency, they shall notify the Administrative Services Director/City Clerk.

Employees shall implement the run, hide, fight protocols where appropriate. Evacuation routes and sheltering locations will be communicated to affected staff. If employees are not able to evacuate or shelter in place, they are authorized to take all reasonable actions necessary to fight or subdue an active shooter or assailant.

Employees can obtain help from staff assigned to respond to workplace violence emergencies, who shall call 911 to report the incident and request assistance from law enforcement.

Emergencies and Reporting a Crime
For immediate assistance in an emergency that is not associated with a service call, contact emergency services or law enforcement by calling 911. For immediate assistance in an emergency associated with a service call in progress, follow internal procedures for requesting immediate back-up assistance by notifying local law enforcement. Employees should also notify their supervisor, manager, and the Administrator as soon as possible.

Reporting Workplace Violence Concerns
Employees who witness or experience threats of violence or workplace violence can report the incident through their chain of command or directly to Human Resources. Employees may report anonymously and without fear of reprisal by submitting the incident in writing through interoffice mail.

Restraining Orders
Employees or other personnel affiliated with the City of Waterford who have an active restraining order issued against another person that includes the workplace are encouraged to provide a copy of the restraining order to their supervisor and the Administrator. Supervisors who receive notification of a restraining order that includes the workplace will meet with the Administrator to decide what actions, if any, need to be initiated.
6 Hazard Assessment
Workplace hazard assessments will include:
• An annual review of the past year’s workplace violence incidents; and • Periodic physical security assessments.

The Workplace Violence Prevention Environmental Hazard Assessment & Control Checklist (Appendix B) can be used to assist with the security assessment. Inspections are performed according to the following schedule:
• Once a year;
• When the policy is implemented;
• When new, previously unidentified workplace violence/security hazards are recognized; and • When workplace violence injuries or threats of injury occur.

Hazard Correction
Work practice controls will be used to correct unsafe work conditions, practices, or procedures that threaten the security of employees.

Work practice controls are defined as procedures, rules, and staffing that are used to effectively reduce workplace violence hazards. Work practice controls may include, but are not limited to:
− Appropriate staffing levels;
− Employee training on workplace violence prevention methods; and − Employee training on procedures to follow in the event of a workplace violence incident.

Corrective actions will be implemented in a timely manner based on the severity of the hazard, documented and dated.

Post Incident Response and Investigation
Managers and supervisors will use the Workplace Violent Incident Log (Attachment A) to assist in documenting incidents and investigations.

These procedures will occur following an incident:
• Provide immediate medical care or first aid;
• Identify all employees involved in the incident;
• Offer staff individual trauma counseling resources;
7 • Conduct a debriefing with all affected staff;
• Determine if corrective measures developed under this policy were effectively implemented; solicit feedback from all personnel involved in the incident as to the cause of this incident and if injuries occurred, how injury could have been prevented; and • Record the incident in the Workplace Violent Incident Log.

Recordkeeping
• Records of workplace violence hazard identification, evaluation, and correction will be maintained for three years in accordance with the recordkeeping requirements of the City of Waterford’s Injury and Illness Prevention Program.
• Training for each employee, including the employee’s name, training dates, type of training, and training provider will be maintained for a minimum of three years. • Records of violent incidents (Workplace Violent Incident Log) will be maintained a minimum of five years.

Annual Review
City of Waterford’s Workplace Violence Prevention Plan will be reviewed annually and updated as needed considering the following criteria:
• Staffing;
• Sufficiency of security systems;
• Job, equipment, and facility design and risks;
• Modifications or additions to tasks and procedures that affect policy implementation; • Newly identified hazards;
• Prior year incidents;
• Identified deficiencies; and
• Feedback provided by employees and their authorized representatives. 1 Appendix A

WORKPLACE VIOLENT INCIDENT LOG
This form must be completed for every record of violence in the workplace Incident ID #*: Date and Time of Incident: Department:

Specific Location of Incident:
* Do not identify employee by name, employee #, or SSI. The Incident ID must not reflect the employee’s identity) Describe Incident (Include additional pages if needed):

Assailant information:

Family or Friend of Patient Parent/Relative of Victim Customer Partner/Spouse of Victim Animal Family or Friend of Customer Former Partner/Spouse of Victim Co-Worker/Supervisor/Manager Other:

Robber/Burglar
Circumstances at time of incident:

Employee Performing Normal Duties Poor Lighting Employee Rushed Employee Isolated or Alone High Crime Area Low Staffing Level Unable to Get Help or Assistance Working in a Community Setting Unfamiliar or New Location Other:

Location of Incident:

Waiting Room Restroom or Bathroom Parking Lot or Outside Building Personal Residence Breakroom Other:

Type of Incident (check as many apply):

Robbery Grabbed Pushed
Verbal Threat or Harassment Kicked Scratched
Sexual Threat, Harassment, or Assault Hit with an Object Bitten Animal Attack Shot (or Attempted) Slapped
Threat of Physical Force Bomb Threat Hit with Fist
Threat of Use of Weapon or Object Vandalism (of Victim’s Property) Knifed (or Attempted) Assault With A Weapon or Object Vandalism (of Employer’s Property) Arson Robbery Other:

Consequences of incident:

Medical care provided? Yes No Law enforcement called? Yes No Days lost from work (if any)_______________ Did anyone provide assistance to conclude the event? Yes No Actions taken by employer to protect employees from a continuing threat? Yes No Completed by:

Name: Title: Date:

Telephone: Email:

Signature: Telephone:
2 Appendix B

WORKPLACE VIOLENCE PREVENTION

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD ASSESSMENT & CONTROL CHECKLIST
Assessed by: Title:

Location(s) Assessed:

This checklist is designed to evaluate the workplace and job tasks to help identify situations that may place employees at risk of workplace violence.

Step 1: Identify risk factors that may increase CITY OF WATERFORD’S vulnerability to workplace violence events
Step 2: Conduct a workplace assessment to identify physical and process vulnerabilities Step 3: Develop a corrective action plan with measurable goals and target dates STEP 1: IDENTIFY RISK FACTORS
Yes No Risk Factors Comments:

Does staff have contact with the public?
Does staff exchange money with the public?
Does staff work alone?
Is the workplace often understaffed?
Is the workplace located in an area with a
high crime rate?
Does staff enter areas with high crime rates?
Does staff have mobile workplaces?
Does staff perform public safety functions
that might put them in conflict with others?
Does staff perform duties that may upset
people?
Does staff work with people known or
suspected to have a history of violence?
Do any employees have a history of threats
of violence?
3 STEP 2: CONDUCT ASSESSMENT
Building Interior
Yes No Building Interior Comments:

Are employee ID badges required?
Are employees notified of past workplace
violence events?
Are bullet resistant windows or similar
barriers used when money is exchanged
with the public?
Are areas where money is exchanged
visible to others?
Is a limited amount of cash kept on hand
with appropriate signage?
Could someone hear an employee who
called for help?
Do employees have a clear line of sight of
visitors in waiting areas?
Do areas used for client or visitor interviews
allow co-employees to observe problems?
Are waiting and work areas free of objects
that could be used as weapons?
Is furniture in waiting and work areas
arranged to prevent employee entrapment?
Are clients and visitors clearly informed how
to use the department services so they will
not become frustrated?
Are private, locked restrooms available for
employees?
Do employees have a secure place to store
personal belonging?
4 Building Exterior
Yes No Building Exterior Comments:

Do employees feel safe walking to and from
the workplace?
Are the entrances to the building clearly
visible from the street?
Is the area surrounding the building free of
bushes or other hiding places?
Is video surveillance provided outside the
building?
Is there enough lighting to see clearly?
Parking Area
Yes No Parking Area Comments:

Is there a nearby parking lot reserved for
staff?
Is the parking lot attended and secure?
Is the parking lot free of blind spots and
landscape trimmed to prevent hiding
places?
Is there enough lighting to see clearly?
Are security escorts available?
5 Security Measures
Yes No Security Measures Comments:

Is there a response plan for workplace
violence emergencies?
Are there physical barriers? (between staff
and clients)
Are there security cameras?
Are there panic buttons?
Are there alarm systems?
Are there metal detectors?
Do doors lock?
Does internal telephone system activate
emergency assistance?
Are telephones with an outside line
programed for 911?
Are there two-way radios, pagers, or cell
phones?
Are there security mirrors?
Is there a secured entry?
Are there personal alarm devices?
Are there “drop safes” to limit available
cash?
Is there a system to alert staff of the
presence, location, and nature of a security
threat?
Is there a system in place for testing security
measures?
STEP 3: DEVELOP CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
(Action Plan Types: BI – Building Interior, BE – Building Exterior, PA – Parking Area, SM – Security Measure) Type Action Item Person(s)
Responsible
Target
Date Status Comments
General Business 6c
September 5, 2024
Lonnie Statzer Public Works Superintendent
City Council Staff Report
Motion: Approving an Agreement between the Modesto Irrigation District (MID) and the City of Waterford, for Improvements completed during “Tim Bell Water and Sewer Project” and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement.

SUMMARY:

The City Council is being asked to approve an agreement between the Modesto Irrigation District, and the City of Waterford, for Improvements completed during the “Tim Bell Water and Sewer Project” and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement.

ANALYSIS:
(MID) requires a license agreement be executed when utilities cross their right of way. The “Tim Bell Water and Sewer Project” project extended city utilities to the Lake Pointe master plan area located north of the MID main canal. The improvements were installed in Tim Bell from Yosemite Blvd (SR132) to Vineyard Road. The project consisted of installing sewer force main and water main, and jack and bore steel casing under two separate MID canals. The work was completed while the canals were empty prior to the 2023/24 irrigation season. This agreement is to be put in place to document the city improvements under the canals and identify responsibility for repair should there be a failure of the newly installed city utilities.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact with this agreement.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This project is categorically exempted according to Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 19 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), in accordance with Section 15301 “Existing Facilities.”
ALTERNATIVES:

N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
• Agreement
83112.00002\41927576.2
No Recording Fees Required Per Government Code
Section 27383

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

Modesto Irrigation District
Secretary, Board of Directors
P.O. Box 4060
Modesto, California 95352

LICENSE AGREEMENT
This Reciprocal License Agreement (“Agreement” or “License”) is made on the ____ day of _________________, 20____, by and between the Modesto Irrigation District, an irrigation district organized and existing under the law of the State of California, hereinafter called “District”, and the CITY OF WATERFORD, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter called “Licensee”.

This Agreement is made with reference to the following facts and circumstances, among others:

A. District has property interests in certain real property consisting of a strip of land, with certain improvements, ditches/canals, drainage facility or equipment thereon, which facility is commonly known and referred to as Modesto Irrigation District’s Modesto Lower Main Canal (hereinafter called “MID Facility”) and which facility is located on land occupied by District as legally described and illustrated in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (hereinafter called “District’s Land”).

B. Licensee desires permission to use a portion of District’s Land for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a domestic water pipeline and sanitary sewer pipeline.

C. District is willing to grant such permission on the terms and conditions set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:

1. License Purpose: District hereby grants to Licensee a reciprocal and non-exclusive license to use District’s Land solely for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a 16” water main pipeline and an 8” sanitary sewer force main pipeline as shown on Exhibit C (hereinafter called the “Improvements”). Except for such Improvements, no other alterations, improvement, installation, construction or use shall be made or permitted by Licensee in, under, along, across, upon or in respect to the MID Facility or District’s Land without the prior written consent of District. The area in which Licensee may place the Improvements, as well as the minimum reasonable area surrounding the Improvements necessary to access and maintain the Improvements, shall be known as the “License Area” and is also depicted on Exhibit B. If the District believes any specific action or activity conducted on District’s Land does not relate to the 83112.00002\41927576.2
Improvements, the District may issue a written notice to Licensee requiring such action or activity to cease immediately.

2. Trenching/Pole Bracing Requirements: All trenching must maintain a 1:1 horizontal distance from any existing pole determined by the depth of the trench. Prior to any encroachment or variation from the standard, Licensee must identify potentially affected poles and arrange any required pole bracing with the District, at Licensee’s sole cost.

3. License Only; No Tenancy Created: This Agreement grants or creates solely a non-exclusive license to use District’s Land and not a license coupled with an interest or any possessory interest.

This Agreement does not grant or create an easement, nor does it convey or transfer to Licensee any right, title or interest in or to any property of District. The License granted herein is nonexclusive. All rights granted hereunder are subject and subordinate to all uses and purposes District may now or in the future make of District’s Land or MID Facility. Licensee shall have no license, right or privilege with respect to District’s Land or MID Facility other than the permission and privileges specifically and expressly contained in this Agreement.

4. Construction at Licensee’s Sole Cost: In constructing, placing, using, inspecting, maintaining, replacing and removing the Improvements, Licensee shall, in addition to all other requirements and limitations set forth herein, comply with each of the following:

A. Licensee shall be solely responsible for said construction, placement, use inspection, maintenance, replacement and removal work within District’s Land and for the Improvements permitted therein by this Agreement.

B. The Improvements to be installed and maintained by Licensee shall conform to the construction specifications as noted on the construction plans attached as Exhibit C incorporated herein by this reference.

C. Licensee shall bear all costs and expenses for said construction, placement, use, inspection, maintenance, replacement and removal of the Improvements, including all permitting costs. The District shall not be responsible for any costs or expenses in connection with the Improvements.

5. No Interference with District Access or Use: Licensee shall not impair the access by District to any of its property or facilities by persons or machines for the purposes of construction, maintenance or operation of its properties or facilities, nor use or cause or allow District’s Land to be used, in any manner that will interfere with, be inconsistent with, or jeopardize the safety of, any use or purpose of District.

6. Approval of Licensee Plans: Licensee shall obtain District’s written approval of any and all facilities, construction or other plans related to the Improvements, and schedules for making any improvements within the License Area, prior to the commencement of any work within the District’s Land. District may at its discretion, and at Licensee’s sole cost, but is not required to, inspect any and all work performed by Licensee, or Licensee’s employees, agents or contractors, within the District’s Land.
83112.00002\41927576.2

7. Alteration, Relocation or Cessation of Use of Improvements: So long as the public health and safety is not compromised, in the event District shall at any time require the Improvements be altered, relocated, or removed for any reason, Licensee, at Licensee’s sole expense, shall alter, relocate or cease use of the District’s Land immediately upon receipt of written notice to Licensee.

8. Licensee Compliance with Laws: All use by Licensee of the License Area, MID Facility and/or District’s Land, including the placement, maintenance, replacement and use of the Improvements, shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, statutes, ordinances and codes, including, without limitation, applicable Occupational Safety and Health Acts, rules and regulations, and all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunal having any jurisdiction or authorities over the Improvements, MID Facility, License Area, District Land or the work to be performed under this Agreement (collectively, “Laws”).

9. Licensee Default: If Licensee violates this Agreement in any way, District shall have all rights and remedies available at law or in equity, including but not limited to the right to terminate this Agreement, and the right, in District’s sole discretion, to remove or alter any Improvements or other item placed or used on District’s Land in violation of any provision of this Agreement. Any such removal or alteration shall be at Licensee’s sole expense. District’s failure to pursue any such remedy or right shall not be a waiver of such default.

10. Contractors: If any of Licensee’s privileges or duties hereunder are to be exercised or performed by any independent contractor(s) or subcontractor(s), Licensee shall, effectively and appropriately, bind such contractor(s) or subcontractor(s), contractually to the duties and obligations of Licensee hereunder. Licensee shall require all contractors and subcontractors to provide the required insurance under this Agreement, comply with all Laws, and to indemnify and hold District harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, loss, liability and expenses, including court costs and attorney’s fees, arising out of or on account of, any injury to or death of any person or persons, or damage to property of any kind whatsoever and to whomsoever belonging, and arising out of or in any manner directly or indirectly connected with, said contractors or contractors acts, omissions or negligence in exercising Licensee’s privileges or performing Licensee’s duties created by this Agreement.

11. Pre Excavation Requirements: Prior to any excavation by Licensee of District’s Land, whether at the time of the installation of Licensee’s Improvements or at any other time, Licensee or its Contractor shall contact District and the Underground Service Alert (U.S.A. – 1-800-642-2444) at least seven (7) days prior to commencing such excavation for the purpose of determining the location of underground facilities, equipment and other improvements. Locating all underground improvements shall be Licensee’s sole responsibility and any damage resulting from failure to do so shall be at Licensee’s sole cost.

12. Hazardous Substances: Licensee shall not use, generate, manufacture, store or dispose of on, under or above District’s Land or within the MID Facility, or transport to, from or across the same, any flammable, explosive or radioactive material, toxic substance, hazardous waste, hazardous material, hazardous substance or the equivalent, as those terms may now or in the future be defined by common practices or by any laws (hereinafter called “Hazardous Substance”). 83112.00002\41927576.2
(a) Without limiting any remedies District may have, in the event that any disposal, release, discharge or spill of a Hazardous Substance or other contamination occurs as a result of Licensee’s use of District’s Land, except such spill or contamination to the extent directly caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of District, Licensee shall immediately notify District and take all action to mitigate the effects of such disposal, release, discharge, spill or contamination. Licensee shall, at its sole expense, remedy such disposal, release, discharge, spill or contamination to the District’s satisfaction and in compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. District shall have the option to perform the remediation itself or through any contractor and Licensee shall cooperate with District to complete the remediation and shall reimburse District for all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the remediation within thirty (30) days of invoice by District. (b) In the event Licensee observes any material Licensee believes or has reason to believe may be Hazardous Substance or encounters any unknown physical condition of any unusual nature on District’s land or within the MID Facility, other than disposals, releases, discharges, spills or contamination covered in (a), Licensee shall, without disturbing the condition, immediately cease all use of District’s Land and notify District. District shall investigate the condition and take any clean up or other remedial action District deems necessary in its sole discretion. (c) In the event District or its contractor elects to perform remediation work, Licensee shall, upon notification from District, cease use of District’s Land as directed in the notice. Such notice shall be given at least fifteen (15) days in advance of the time at which Licensee shall cease its use of District’s Land; provided that the period of notice provided in this paragraph may be reduced in the event of an emergency or exigent circumstances necessitating such lesser notice, and provided that in such cases District shall give as much notice as practical under the circumstances.

District will notify Licensee when the condition has been resolved, at which time, but not before, Licensee may resume its use of District’s Land. (d) If Licensee, its agents, employees, contractors or invitees breaches the obligation in Paragraph 12(a) above, or if the presence of Hazardous Substances on the License Area or District Land caused or permitted by Licensee, its agents, employees, contractors or invitees results in contamination of the License Area or District Land, or if contamination of the License Area or District Land by Hazardous Substances otherwise occurs for which Licensee, its agents, employees, contractors or invitees is legally liable to District for damage resulting therefrom, Licensee shall indemnify, defend and hold District and its directors, officers, and employees harmless from any and all claims, judgments, damages, penalties, fines, costs liabilities or losses (including, without limitation, diminution in value of the District Land) which arise during or after the term of the License as a result of such contamination. Licensee shall make special arrangements for storage and disposal pursuant to applicable state and federal regulations and laws for any Hazardous Substances or water which has come into contact with Hazardous Substances, and Licensee shall cause copies of any required disposal documentation or manifests to 83112.00002\41927576.2
be provided to District. Paragraph 12 of this License shall survive the termination of this License.

13. Prohibited Repair Season: Licensee agrees to cooperate with District’s efficient conveyance of water and endeavor to perform work during the least disruptive times, as determined by the District. Specifically, unless absolutely necessary, and in any event only with notice to District of such necessity, Licensee shall not perform any work within District’s Land or on the MID Facility during (i) the irrigation season (approximately March through October) or (ii) other times that would interfere with the delivery of water, including but not limited to storm water drainage during the winter months.

14. Maintenance of Improvements: Except as otherwise set forth herein, the Improvements between Licensee and District shall be the property of Licensee. Licensee shall at all times maintain, at its own cost and expense, the Improvements and all associated facilities. Any such repair shall be performed and completed in a timely manner in strict accordance with all Laws. Licensee agrees to assume the sole and exclusive risk for damage to property or injury or death to any person, arising from, or in any way related to Licensee’s Improvements. District shall have no duty or obligation to maintain Improvements.

15. Damage or Degradation: If Licensee’s exercise of rights under this Agreement, including the construction, use, maintenance or removal of the Improvements, or any portion thereof, causes damage, injury, impairment or degradation to the License Area, District’s Land, the MID Facility, or any other property or facility of District, Licensee shall at its sole cost and expense, repair said damage, injury, impairment or degradation within fifteen (15) days of receipt of written notice by District. Any such repair shall be performed in a timely manner in strict accordance with all Laws, and using plans acceptable to District.

16. District Right to Enter License Area: The District reserves unto itself the right to travel on, over, along and across the License Area, including in the vicinity of the Improvements, without notice to Licensee, for any reasonable District purpose, in the District’s sole discretion.

17. Release; Waiver: Licensee hereby waives, releases, acquits, and forever discharges the District, and its agents, directors, officers, representatives, and employees to the maximum extent permitted by law, of and from any and all claims, actions, causes of action, demands, rights, liabilities, damages, losses, costs, expenses, or compensation whatsoever, direct or indirect, known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, that it now has or that may arise in the future because of or in any way growing out of or connected with this Agreement and District’s Land, except matters arising from District’s fraud or intentional misrepresentation. Licensee expressly waives its rights granted under the provisions of any law that provides that a general release does not extend to claims that Licensee does not know or suspect to exist in its favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by it must have materially affected its agreement to release District including, without limitation, California Civil Code section 1542, which provides:

A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT

THE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR

SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF

EXECUTING THE RELEASE AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HIM OR
83112.00002\41927576.2

HER, WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER
SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR OR RELEASED PARTY.

Licensee has initialed this Section 17 to further indicate their awareness and acceptance of each and every provision of this Agreement. The provisions of this Section 17 will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

Licensee’s Initials: ______

18. Licensee Indemnification: Licensee shall indemnify, defend, and hold District and its directors, officers, and employees harmless from any and all claims, demands, damages, causes of action, judgments, liabilities, losses, costs, expenses (including attorneys' fees and court costs), liens, charges and encumbrances of any kind whatsoever in connection with, arising out of or by reason of the use of the MID Facility, License Area, or District Land or any act, omission, or negligence by Licensee, its directors, officers, employees, agents, contractors, Licensee's customers or business invitees while in, upon, about or in any way connected with the MID Facility, License Area, or District Land or arising from any accident, injury or damage howsoever caused, to any person or property whatsoever occurring in, upon, about or in any way connected with the MID Facility, License Area, or District Land excepting the gross negligence or willful misconduct of District. District assumes no liability or responsibility for any personal property brought onto District Land or the District Facility by Licensee, its agents, employees, business invitees, contractors or assigns unless caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of District. The obligations of District under this License do not constitute personal obligations of the individual partners, members, directors, officers, agents or shareholders of District. Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, at all times keep the License Area and District Land free of any liens, claims, charges or encumbrances arising out of or relating to Licensee's activities and shall obtain the discharge and release of any lien, charge or encumbrance filed of record, within 30 days after the filing of the same, unless Licensee elects to contest such lien, charge or encumbrance, in which event Licensee shall provide such security, bond or other protection as District shall require in its sole and absolute discretion. Nothing contained herein shall prevent District, at the cost and on account of Licensee, from at any time obtaining such discharge and release in the event Licensee shall fail or refuse to do so. Licensee's indemnity is not intended to nor shall it relieve any insurance carrier of its obligations under policies required to be carried by Licensee pursuant to the provisions of this License to the extent that such policies cover the results of negligent acts or omissions of District, its officers, agents, contractors or employees, or the failure of District to perform any of its obligations under this License. This Paragraph 17 of this Agreement shall survive the termination of this License.

19. Licensee Insurance Coverages: Licensee shall, at Licensee’s expense, maintain in effect at all times during Licensee’s use of License Area under this Agreement, not less than the coverages and amounts of insurance described on Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. This coverage shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policies satisfactory to District. Licensee shall have the right to self-insure with respect to the insurance requirements required under this Agreement. In the event that Licensee so chooses to self-insure, Licensee represents that Licensee’s self-insurance program is in full force and effect, and shall remain in full 83112.00002\41927576.2
force and effect for the duration of the Agreement, in compliance with and subject to all the terms, agreements, covenants, conditions and provisions of this Agreement.

20. No Warranty /As-Is: District makes no representation as to, and does not warrant, the condition of District’s Land, License Area or the MID Facility either at the inception of this Agreement or as to any future point in time. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating or imposing upon District any duty or obligation to maintain or repair the MID Facility, District’s Land or the License Area.

21. District Rights: District’s rights hereunder to approve, inspect, audit, review or the like, shall not impose any duties or obligations on District, nor shall such rights relieve Licensee of the sole responsibility for the Improvements or any plans, schedules and work, or relieve Licensee of its contractual responsibilities hereunder.

22. No Third Party Beneficiary: This Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and it is not made for the benefit of any person, firm, association, corporation or public entity not a party hereto and no person, firm association, corporation or public entity other than the parties hereto shall have any right to enforce this Agreement.

23. Successors and Assigns; Consent Required for Assignment: The terms and provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind each party’s respective successors in interest and assigns; provided, however that neither party shall assign its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other party which consent will not be unreasonably withheld. Any assignment, whether voluntary or involuntary, in violation of this Paragraph shall be void.

24. Licensee Limited to District’s Rights: It is expressly understood and agreed that this Agreement shall operate to give Licensee the rights herein provided for only insofar as District may do so under and by virtue of the rights that District has in the MID Facility and District’s Land to which this Agreement applies and District makes no warranty or representation as to its ownership or land rights in or adjacent to the District’s rights-of-way or the District’s Land.

25. Entire Agreement; Severability: This Agreement contains all the agreements of the parties hereto regarding the subject matter hereof and cannot be amended or modified except by a written agreement executed by the parties. If any provision of this License is declared invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of any remaining portions, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect as if this License had been executed with the invalid portion thereof eliminated.

26. Waiver: No waiver of any provisions of the Agreement shall be effective except in writing signed by the waiving party. Any waiver at any time by the District of any of its rights with respect to a breach under this License shall not be deemed a waiver with respect to any subsequent breach or other matter. Any delay in exercising any right hereunder, short of any statutory period of limitation in asserting or enforcing any right, shall not be deemed a waiver of such a right.

27. Abandonment by Licensee/Sale of Licensee Property : In the event that (1) Licensee ceases to occupy or own Licensee’s property adjacent to the District’s real property, (2) the License granted herein is no longer used by Licensee for the permitted purposes, or (3) the Agreement is otherwise 83112.00002\41927576.2
terminated in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, Licensee at its sole expense, shall remove all of Licensee’s Improvements and restore District’s Land to its original condition or to a condition acceptable to the District, and shall take such other closure action as is reasonably requested by the District. This License is personal to Licensee and may not be assigned without written consent by District pursuant to Paragraph 22. If Licensee fails to comply with the requirements of this Paragraph, District may undertake and complete such removal and restoration at the sole cost and expense of Licensee. Licensee shall reimburse District for the costs of such removal and restoration within thirty (30) days of invoice by District. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, upon the occurrence of any of the above listed events, all rights granted to Licensee hereunder shall terminate.

28. Termination: Either party may terminate this License at any time by giving the other party at least thirty (30) days prior written notice. This License may be terminated immediately by District without notice if (1) Licensee is in material breach of the Agreement, (2) District determines there is unsafe and/or dangerous conditions, threats to life or property, (3) a natural disaster or emergency makes it necessary for the District to use the District’s Land for alternative purposes, or (4) District and Licensee enter into a revised agreement for the use of District’s Land.

29. Joint Venture. It is not intended by this Agreement to, and nothing contained in this Agreement shall, create any partnership, joint venture or other agreement between the District and Licensee.

No term or provision of this Agreement is intended to be, or shall be, for the benefit of any person, firm, organization or corporation not a party hereto, and no such other person, firm, organization or corporation shall have any right or cause of action hereunder.

30. Titles/Recitals/Counterparts/Exhibits: The titles of the paragraphs of this License are for convenience only and shall not in any way affect the interpretation. The Recitals are material to and incorporated into this License. This License may be signed in counterparts. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

31. Governing Law: This License shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, with venue in Stanislaus County.

32. Notices: All other notices required or permitted by or pertaining to this License shall be in writing and addressed to the party to be notified at the address specified below such party‘s signature on this License, any changes to be immediately communicated by the party making the change to the other party. All notices shall be sent by postage prepaid U.S. mail, by recognized overnight delivery service, or by personal delivery and shall be deemed to have been delivered when received in the case of personal delivery, overnight delivery or on the 3rd business day after the date of mailing.
83112.00002\41927576.2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate of the day and year first above written.

MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
By
Jimi Netniss – General Manager
LICENSEE: CITY OF WATERFORD, a
California municipal corporation
By ________________________________
Michael Pitcock, P.E. – City Manager
Notice Address: Notice Address:

Modesto Irrigation District: ______________________________ Attn:________________________ Attn:__________________________ 1231 Eleventh Street ______________________________
Modesto, CA 95354 ______________________________
Exhibits:

Exhibit A: Legal Description / Map District Land and MID Facility Exhibit B: License Area
Exhibit C: Improvements / Plans
Exhibit D: Insurance Requirements

83112.00002\41927576.2
Exhibit A
Legal Description / Map District Land and MID Facility
83112.00002\41927576.2
Exhibit B
License Area
83112.00002\41927576.2
Exhibit C
Improvements / Plans
83112.00002\41927576.2
Exhibit D
Insurance Requirements
Licensee, at its sole cost and expense, and without limiting any of its other obligations or liabilities, shall maintain in effect at all times during this Agreement not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policies satisfactory to the District.

1. Commercial General Liability or
Comprehensive General Liability Insurance
Commercial general liability or comprehensive general liability insurance shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, coverage for premises and operations, contractual liability, personal injury liability, products/completed operations for the term of the Agreement and for at least two years after completion of the work, and independent contractors, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage, two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) aggregate.

2. Business Automobile or
Comprehensive Automobile Insurance
Business automobile or comprehensive automobile insurance including, as applicable, owned, non-owned, and hired automobiles, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence combined single limit of bodily injury and property damage. If applicable, coverage shall include U.S. Department of Transportation Form MCS-90 (or comparable form required by other agencies) providing pollution coverage for transportation of hazardous waste.

3. Workers’ Compensation
Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, including Employers Liability limits of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence.

All policies shall contain an endorsement providing that written notice by certified mail shall be given to the District at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to termination, cancellation or reduction of coverage in the policy.

Each insurance policy required pursuant to this Agreement excepting policies for Workers’ Compensation, shall contain the following:
(1) Endorsements naming the Modesto Irrigation District, its directors, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers, and each of them, as additional insureds as respects liabilities arising out of the performance of any work under this Agreement, and providing that such insurance is primary insurance as respects the interest of the District and that any other insurance maintained by the District is excess and not contributing insurance with the insurance required hereunder.
83112.00002\41927576.2
(2) “Cross Liability” or “Severability of Interest” clause. (3) Provisions or endorsements stating that such insurance, subject to all of its other terms and conditions, applies to the liability assumed by Licensee under this Agreement including without limitation that set forth in the indemnity provisions of this Agreement.
(4) Insurance provider must maintain a Best Rating of A: VII or above.

Licensee shall furnish the District with certificates of insurance and with original endorsements affecting coverage required by this Agreement. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall make reference to all the provisions and endorsements referred to above, and shall be signed on behalf of the insurer by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the District before work commences. The District reserves the right to require complete certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time.

Any deductible or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by District. 83112.00002\41927577.2
No Recording Fees Required Per Government Code
Section 27383

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

Modesto Irrigation District
Secretary, Board of Directors
P.O. Box 4060
Modesto, California 95352

LICENSE AGREEMENT
This Reciprocal Agreement (“Agreement” or “License”) is made on the ____ day of _________________, 20____, by and between the Modesto Irrigation District, an irrigation district organized and existing under the law of the State of California, hereinafter called “District”, and CITY OF WATERFORD, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter called “Licensee”.

This Agreement is made with reference to the following facts and circumstances, among others:

A. District has property interests in certain real property consisting of a strip of land, with certain improvements, ditches/canals, drainage facility or equipment thereon, which facility is commonly known and referred to as Modesto Irrigation District’s Waterford Lower Main Canal (hereinafter called “MID Facility”) and which facility is located on land occupied by District as legally described and illustrated in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (hereinafter called “District’s Land”).

B. Licensee desires permission to use a portion of District’s Land for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a domestic water pipeline and sanitary sewer pipeline.

C. District is willing to grant such permission on the terms and conditions set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:

1. License Purpose: District hereby grants to Licensee a reciprocal and non-exclusive license to use District’s Land solely for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a 16” water main pipeline and an 8” sanitary sewer force main pipeline as shown on Exhibit C (hereinafter called the “Improvements”). Except for such Improvements, no other alterations, improvement, installation, construction or use shall be made or permitted by Licensee in, under, along, across, upon or in respect to the MID Facility or District’s Land without the prior written consent of District. The area in which Licensee may place the Improvements, as well as the minimum reasonable area surrounding the Improvements necessary to access and maintain the Improvements, shall be known as the “License Area” and is also depicted on Exhibit B. If the District believes any specific action or activity conducted on District’s Land does not relate to the 83112.00002\41927577.2
Improvements, the District may issue a written notice to Licensee requiring such action or activity to cease immediately.

2. Trenching/Pole Bracing Requirements: All trenching must maintain a 1:1 horizontal distance from any existing pole determined by the depth of the trench. Prior to any encroachment or variation from the standard, Licensee must identify potentially affected poles and arrange any required pole bracing with the District, at Licensee’s sole cost.

3. License Only; No Tenancy Created: This Agreement grants or creates solely a non-exclusive license to use District’s Land and not a license coupled with an interest or any possessory interest.

This Agreement does not grant or create an easement, nor does it convey or transfer to Licensee any right, title or interest in or to any property of District. The License granted herein is nonexclusive. All rights granted hereunder are subject and subordinate to all uses and purposes District may now or in the future make of District’s Land or MID Facility. Licensee shall have no license, right or privilege with respect to District’s Land or MID Facility other than the permission and privileges specifically and expressly contained in this Agreement.

4. Construction at Licensee’s Sole Cost: In constructing, placing, using, inspecting, maintaining, replacing and removing the Improvements, Licensee shall, in addition to all other requirements and limitations set forth herein, comply with each of the following:

A. Licensee shall be solely responsible for said construction, placement, use inspection, maintenance, replacement and removal work within District’s Land and for the Improvements permitted therein by this Agreement.

B. The Improvements to be installed and maintained by Licensee shall conform to the construction specifications as noted on the construction plans attached as Exhibit C incorporated herein by this reference.

C. Licensee shall bear all costs and expenses for said construction, placement, use, inspection, maintenance, replacement and removal of the Improvements, including all permitting costs. The District shall not be responsible for any costs or expenses in connection with the Improvements.

5. No Interference with District Access or Use: Licensee shall not impair the access by District to any of its property or facilities by persons or machines for the purposes of construction, maintenance or operation of its properties or facilities, nor use or cause or allow District’s Land to be used, in any manner that will interfere with, be inconsistent with, or jeopardize the safety of, any use or purpose of District.

6. Approval of Licensee Plans: Licensee shall obtain District’s written approval of any and all facilities, construction or other plans related to the Improvements, and schedules for making any improvements within the License Area, prior to the commencement of any work within the District’s Land. District may at its discretion, and at Licensee’s sole cost, but is not required to, inspect any and all work performed by Licensee, or Licensee’s employees, agents or contractors, within the District’s Land.
83112.00002\41927577.2

7. Alteration, Relocation or Cessation of Use of Improvements: So long as the public health and safety is not compromised, in the event District shall at any time require the Improvements be altered, relocated, or removed for any reason, Licensee, at Licensee’s sole expense, shall alter, relocate or cease use of the District’s Land immediately upon receipt of written notice to Licensee.

8. Licensee Compliance with Laws: All use by Licensee of the License Area, MID Facility and/or District’s Land, including the placement, maintenance, replacement and use of the Improvements, shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, statutes, ordinances and codes, including, without limitation, applicable Occupational Safety and Health Acts, rules and regulations, and all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunal having any jurisdiction or authorities over the Improvements, MID Facility, License Area, District Land or the work to be performed under this Agreement (collectively, “Laws”).

9. Licensee Default: If Licensee violates this Agreement in any way, District shall have all rights and remedies available at law or in equity, including but not limited to the right to terminate this Agreement, and the right, in District’s sole discretion, to remove or alter any Improvements or other item placed or used on District’s Land in violation of any provision of this Agreement. Any such removal or alteration shall be at Licensee’s sole expense. District’s failure to pursue any such remedy or right shall not be a waiver of such default.

10. Contractors: If any of Licensee’s privileges or duties hereunder are to be exercised or performed by any independent contractor(s) or subcontractor(s), Licensee shall, effectively and appropriately, bind such contractor(s) or subcontractor(s), contractually to the duties and obligations of Licensee hereunder. Licensee shall require all contractors and subcontractors to provide the required insurance under this Agreement, comply with all Laws, and to indemnify and hold District harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, loss, liability and expenses, including court costs and attorney’s fees, arising out of or on account of, any injury to or death of any person or persons, or damage to property of any kind whatsoever and to whomsoever belonging, and arising out of or in any manner directly or indirectly connected with, said contractors or contractors acts, omissions or negligence in exercising Licensee’s privileges or performing Licensee’s duties created by this Agreement.

11. Pre Excavation Requirements: Prior to any excavation by Licensee of District’s Land, whether at the time of the installation of Licensee’s Improvements or at any other time, Licensee or its Contractor shall contact District and the Underground Service Alert (U.S.A. – 1-800-642-2444) at least seven (7) days prior to commencing such excavation for the purpose of determining the location of underground facilities, equipment and other improvements. Locating all underground improvements shall be Licensee’s sole responsibility and any damage resulting from failure to do so shall be at Licensee’s sole cost.

12. Hazardous Substances: Licensee shall not use, generate, manufacture, store or dispose of on, under or above District’s Land or within the MID Facility, or transport to, from or across the same, any flammable, explosive or radioactive material, toxic substance, hazardous waste, hazardous material, hazardous substance or the equivalent, as those terms may now or in the future be defined by common practices or by any laws (hereinafter called “Hazardous Substance”). 83112.00002\41927577.2
(a) Without limiting any remedies District may have, in the event that any disposal, release, discharge or spill of a Hazardous Substance or other contamination occurs as a result of Licensee’s use of District’s Land, except such spill or contamination to the extent directly caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of District, Licensee shall immediately notify District and take all action to mitigate the effects of such disposal, release, discharge, spill or contamination. Licensee shall, at its sole expense, remedy such disposal, release, discharge, spill or contamination to the District’s satisfaction and in compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. District shall have the option to perform the remediation itself or through any contractor and Licensee shall cooperate with District to complete the remediation and shall reimburse District for all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the remediation within thirty (30) days of invoice by District. (b) In the event Licensee observes any material Licensee believes or has reason to believe may be Hazardous Substance or encounters any unknown physical condition of any unusual nature on District’s land or within the MID Facility, other than disposals, releases, discharges, spills or contamination covered in (a), Licensee shall, without disturbing the condition, immediately cease all use of District’s Land and notify District. District shall investigate the condition and take any clean up or other remedial action District deems necessary in its sole discretion. (c) In the event District or its contractor elects to perform remediation work, Licensee shall, upon notification from District, cease use of District’s Land as directed in the notice. Such notice shall be given at least fifteen (15) days in advance of the time at which Licensee shall cease its use of District’s Land; provided that the period of notice provided in this paragraph may be reduced in the event of an emergency or exigent circumstances necessitating such lesser notice, and provided that in such cases District shall give as much notice as practical under the circumstances.

District will notify Licensee when the condition has been resolved, at which time, but not before, Licensee may resume its use of District’s Land. (d) If Licensee, its agents, employees, contractors or invitees breaches the obligation in Paragraph 12(a) above, or if the presence of Hazardous Substances on the License Area or District Land caused or permitted by Licensee, its agents, employees, contractors or invitees results in contamination of the License Area or District Land, or if contamination of the License Area or District Land by Hazardous Substances otherwise occurs for which Licensee, its agents, employees, contractors or invitees is legally liable to District for damage resulting therefrom, Licensee shall indemnify, defend and hold District and its directors, officers, and employees harmless from any and all claims, judgments, damages, penalties, fines, costs liabilities or losses (including, without limitation, diminution in value of the District Land) which arise during or after the term of the License as a result of such contamination. Licensee shall make special arrangements for storage and disposal pursuant to applicable state and federal regulations and laws for any Hazardous Substances or water which has come into contact with Hazardous Substances, and Licensee shall cause copies of any required disposal documentation or manifests to 83112.00002\41927577.2
be provided to District. Paragraph 12 of this License shall survive the termination of this License.

13. Prohibited Repair Season: Licensee agrees to cooperate with District’s efficient conveyance of water and endeavor to perform work during the least disruptive times, as determined by the District. Specifically, unless absolutely necessary, and in any event only with notice to District of such necessity, Licensee shall not perform any work within District’s Land or on the MID Facility during (i) the irrigation season (approximately March through October) or (ii) other times that would interfere with the delivery of water, including but not limited to storm water drainage during the winter months.

14. Maintenance of Improvements: Except as otherwise set forth herein, the Improvements between Licensee and District shall be the property of Licensee. Licensee shall at all times maintain, at its own cost and expense, the Improvements and all associated facilities. Any such repair shall be performed and completed in a timely manner in strict accordance with all Laws. Licensee agrees to assume the sole and exclusive risk for damage to property or injury or death to any person, arising from, or in any way related to Licensee’s Improvements. District shall have no duty or obligation to maintain Improvements.

15. Damage or Degradation: If Licensee’s exercise of rights under this Agreement, including the construction, use, maintenance or removal of the Improvements, or any portion thereof, causes damage, injury, impairment or degradation to the License Area, District’s Land, the MID Facility, or any other property or facility of District, Licensee shall at its sole cost and expense, repair said damage, injury, impairment or degradation within fifteen (15) days of receipt of written notice by District. Any such repair shall be performed in a timely manner in strict accordance with all Laws, and using plans acceptable to District.

16. District Right to Enter License Area: The District reserves unto itself the right to travel on, over, along and across the License Area, including in the vicinity of the Improvements, without notice to Licensee, for any reasonable District purpose, in the District’s sole discretion.

17. Release; Waiver: Licensee hereby waives, releases, acquits, and forever discharges the District, and its agents, directors, officers, representatives, and employees to the maximum extent permitted by law, of and from any and all claims, actions, causes of action, demands, rights, liabilities, damages, losses, costs, expenses, or compensation whatsoever, direct or indirect, known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, that it now has or that may arise in the future because of or in any way growing out of or connected with this Agreement and District’s Land, except matters arising from District’s fraud or intentional misrepresentation. Licensee expressly waives its rights granted under the provisions of any law that provides that a general release does not extend to claims that Licensee does not know or suspect to exist in its favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by it must have materially affected its agreement to release District including, without limitation, California Civil Code section 1542, which provides:

A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT

THE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR

SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF

EXECUTING THE RELEASE AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HIM OR
83112.00002\41927577.2

HER, WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER
SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR OR RELEASED PARTY.

Licensee has initialed this Section 17 to further indicate their awareness and acceptance of each and every provision of this Agreement. The provisions of this Section 17 will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

Licensee’s Initials: ______

18. Licensee Indemnification: Licensee shall indemnify, defend, and hold District and its directors, officers, and employees harmless from any and all claims, demands, damages, causes of action, judgments, liabilities, losses, costs, expenses (including attorneys' fees and court costs), liens, charges and encumbrances of any kind whatsoever in connection with, arising out of or by reason of the use of the MID Facility, License Area, or District Land or any act, omission, or negligence by Licensee, its directors, officers, employees, agents, contractors, Licensee's customers or business invitees while in, upon, about or in any way connected with the MID Facility, License Area, or District Land or arising from any accident, injury or damage howsoever caused, to any person or property whatsoever occurring in, upon, about or in any way connected with the MID Facility, License Area, or District Land excepting the gross negligence or willful misconduct of District. District assumes no liability or responsibility for any personal property brought onto District Land or the District Facility by Licensee, its agents, employees, business invitees, contractors or assigns unless caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of District. The obligations of District under this License do not constitute personal obligations of the individual partners, members, directors, officers, agents or shareholders of District. Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, at all times keep the License Area and District Land free of any liens, claims, charges or encumbrances arising out of or relating to Licensee's activities and shall obtain the discharge and release of any lien, charge or encumbrance filed of record, within 30 days after the filing of the same, unless Licensee elects to contest such lien, charge or encumbrance, in which event Licensee shall provide such security, bond or other protection as District shall require in its sole and absolute discretion. Nothing contained herein shall prevent District, at the cost and on account of Licensee, from at any time obtaining such discharge and release in the event Licensee shall fail or refuse to do so. Licensee's indemnity is not intended to nor shall it relieve any insurance carrier of its obligations under policies required to be carried by Licensee pursuant to the provisions of this License to the extent that such policies cover the results of negligent acts or omissions of District, its officers, agents, contractors or employees, or the failure of District to perform any of its obligations under this License. This Paragraph 17 of this Agreement shall survive the termination of this License.

19. Licensee Insurance Coverages: Licensee shall, at Licensee’s expense, maintain in effect at all times during Licensee’s use of License Area under this Agreement, not less than the coverages and amounts of insurance described on Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. This coverage shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policies satisfactory to District. Licensee shall have the right to self-insure with respect to the insurance requirements required under this Agreement. In the event that Licensee so chooses to self-insure, Licensee represents that Licensee’s self-insurance program is in full force and effect, and shall remain in full force and effect for the duration of the Agreement, in compliance with and subject to all the terms, agreements, covenants, conditions and provisions of this Agreement. 83112.00002\41927577.2

20. No Warranty /As-Is: District makes no representation as to, and does not warrant, the condition of District’s Land, License Area or the MID Facility either at the inception of this Agreement or as to any future point in time. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating or imposing upon District any duty or obligation to maintain or repair the MID Facility, District’s Land or the License Area.

21. District Rights: District’s rights hereunder to approve, inspect, audit, review or the like, shall not impose any duties or obligations on District, nor shall such rights relieve Licensee of the sole responsibility for the Improvements or any plans, schedules and work, or relieve Licensee of its contractual responsibilities hereunder.

22. No Third Party Beneficiary: This Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and it is not made for the benefit of any person, firm, association, corporation or public entity not a party hereto and no person, firm association, corporation or public entity other than the parties hereto shall have any right to enforce this Agreement.

23. Successors and Assigns; Consent Required for Assignment: The terms and provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind each party’s respective successors in interest and assigns; provided, however that neither party shall assign its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other party which consent will not be unreasonably withheld. Any assignment, whether voluntary or involuntary, in violation of this Paragraph shall be void.

24. Licensee Limited to District’s Rights: It is expressly understood and agreed that this Agreement shall operate to give Licensee the rights herein provided for only insofar as District may do so under and by virtue of the rights that District has in the MID Facility and District’s Land to which this Agreement applies and District makes no warranty or representation as to its ownership or land rights in or adjacent to the District’s rights-of-way or the District’s Land.

25. Entire Agreement; Severability: This Agreement contains all the agreements of the parties hereto regarding the subject matter hereof and cannot be amended or modified except by a written agreement executed by the parties. If any provision of this License is declared invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of any remaining portions, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect as if this License had been executed with the invalid portion thereof eliminated.

26. Waiver: No waiver of any provisions of the Agreement shall be effective except in writing signed by the waiving party. Any waiver at any time by the District of any of its rights with respect to a breach under this License shall not be deemed a waiver with respect to any subsequent breach or other matter. Any delay in exercising any right hereunder, short of any statutory period of limitation in asserting or enforcing any right, shall not be deemed a waiver of such a right.

27. Abandonment by Licensee/Sale of Licensee Property : In the event that (1) Licensee ceases to occupy or own Licensee’s property adjacent to the District’s real property, (2) the License granted herein is no longer used by Licensee for the permitted purposes, or (3) the Agreement is otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, Licensee at its sole expense, shall remove all of Licensee’s Improvements and restore District’s Land to its original condition or to a 83112.00002\41927577.2
condition acceptable to the District, and shall take such other closure action as is reasonably requested by the District. This License is personal to Licensee and may not be assigned without written consent by District pursuant to Paragraph 22. If Licensee fails to comply with the requirements of this Paragraph, District may undertake and complete such removal and restoration at the sole cost and expense of Licensee. Licensee shall reimburse District for the costs of such removal and restoration within thirty (30) days of invoice by District. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, upon the occurrence of any of the above listed events, all rights granted to Licensee hereunder shall terminate.

28. Termination: Either party may terminate this License at any time by giving the other party at least thirty (30) days prior written notice. This License may be terminated immediately by District without notice if (1) Licensee is in material breach of the Agreement, (2) District determines there is unsafe and/or dangerous conditions, threats to life or property, (3) a natural disaster or emergency makes it necessary for the District to use the District’s Land for alternative purposes, or (4) District and Licensee enter into a revised agreement for the use of District’s Land.

29. Joint Venture. It is not intended by this Agreement to, and nothing contained in this Agreement shall, create any partnership, joint venture or other agreement between the District and Licensee.

No term or provision of this Agreement is intended to be, or shall be, for the benefit of any person, firm, organization or corporation not a party hereto, and no such other person, firm, organization or corporation shall have any right or cause of action hereunder.

30. Titles/Recitals/Counterparts/Exhibits: The titles of the paragraphs of this License are for convenience only and shall not in any way affect the interpretation. The Recitals are material to and incorporated into this License. This License may be signed in counterparts. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

31. Governing Law: This License shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, with venue in Stanislaus County.

32. Notices: All other notices required or permitted by or pertaining to this License shall be in writing and addressed to the party to be notified at the address specified below such party‘s signature on this License, any changes to be immediately communicated by the party making the change to the other party. All notices shall be sent by postage prepaid U.S. mail, by recognized overnight delivery service, or by personal delivery and shall be deemed to have been delivered when received in the case of personal delivery, overnight delivery or on the 3rd business day after the date of mailing.
83112.00002\41927577.2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate of the day and year first above written.

MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
By
Jimi Netniss – General Manager
LICENSEE: CITY OF WATERFORD, a
California municipal corporation
By ________________________________
Michael Pitcock, P.E. – City Manager
Notice Address: Notice Address:

Modesto Irrigation District: ______________________________ Attn:________________________ Attn:__________________________ 1231 Eleventh Street ______________________________
Modesto, CA 95354 ______________________________
Exhibits:

Exhibit A: Legal Description / Map District Land and MID Facility Exhibit B: License Area
Exhibit C: Improvements / Plans
Exhibit D: Insurance Requirements

83112.00002\41927577.2
Exhibit A
Legal Description / Map District Land and MID Facility
83112.00002\41927577.2
Exhibit B
License Area
83112.00002\41927577.2
Exhibit C
Improvements / Plans
83112.00002\41927577.2
Exhibit D
Insurance Requirements
Licensee, at its sole cost and expense, and without limiting any of its other obligations or liabilities, shall maintain in effect at all times during this Agreement not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policies satisfactory to the District.

1. Commercial General Liability or
Comprehensive General Liability Insurance
Commercial general liability or comprehensive general liability insurance shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, coverage for premises and operations, contractual liability, personal injury liability, products/completed operations for the term of the Agreement and for at least two years after completion of the work, and independent contractors, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage, two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) aggregate.

2. Business Automobile or
Comprehensive Automobile Insurance
Business automobile or comprehensive automobile insurance including, as applicable, owned, non-owned, and hired automobiles, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence combined single limit of bodily injury and property damage. If applicable, coverage shall include U.S. Department of Transportation Form MCS-90 (or comparable form required by other agencies) providing pollution coverage for transportation of hazardous waste.

3. Workers’ Compensation
Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, including Employers Liability limits of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence.

All policies shall contain an endorsement providing that written notice by certified mail shall be given to the District at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to termination, cancellation or reduction of coverage in the policy.

Each insurance policy required pursuant to this Agreement excepting policies for Workers’ Compensation, shall contain the following:
(1) Endorsements naming the Modesto Irrigation District, its directors, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers, and each of them, as additional insureds as respects liabilities arising out of the performance of any work under this Agreement, and providing that such insurance is primary insurance as respects the interest of the District and that any other insurance maintained by the District is excess and not contributing insurance with the insurance required hereunder.
83112.00002\41927577.2
(2) “Cross Liability” or “Severability of Interest” clause. (3) Provisions or endorsements stating that such insurance, subject to all of its other terms and conditions, applies to the liability assumed by Licensee under this Agreement including without limitation that set forth in the indemnity provisions of this Agreement.
(4) Insurance provider must maintain a Best Rating of A: VII or above.

Licensee shall furnish the District with certificates of insurance and with original endorsements affecting coverage required by this Agreement. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall make reference to all the provisions and endorsements referred to above, and shall be signed on behalf of the insurer by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the District before work commences. The District reserves the right to require complete certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time.

Any deductible or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by District.

General Business 6d
September 5, 2024
Lonnie Statzer Public Works Director
City Council Staff Report
Motion: Awarding Bid and Approving an Agreement with Tennyson Electric LLC, in the Amount of $518,275.00 for Project No. 2024-03, “Yosemite and Pasadena Signalization Improvements” and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement.

SUMMARY:

The City Council is being asked to award a bid and approve an agreement with Tennyson Electric LLC, in the amount of $518,275.00 for Project No. 2024-03 “Tennyson Electric LLC,” and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement.

ANALYSIS:

The City was awarded a CMAQ Grant to help fund the Yosemite and Pasadena Signalization improvements project along with match funds from Measure L Traffic Management Funds. The community has needed this signalized intersection for quite a few years. This signalized intersection will provide the residents of our community along with regular commuters passing through our city safer passage along one of our city’s main corridors. This project consists of the full signalization of the intersection, striping, signage, and minor concrete work.

On August 19, 2024, The City received four bids:

Bid Company City and State Bid Amount

1. Tennyson Electric LLC Livermore CA 94550 $518,275.00

2. Pacific Excavation Inc. Elk Grove CA 95624 $598,992.00

3. St. Francis Electric San Leandro CA 94577 $607,300.00

4. Bear Electrical Solutions Inc. Alviso CA 95002 $778,500.00

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for this project will come from Measure L Traffic Management Funds and CMAC Grant for fiscal year 2024/2025.

The project budget is as follows:

Expenses (Budget Line Code 6310-310-8293)
Total Project Cost Construction
Contract
Construction
Contingency
Construction
Engineering &
Inspection
Preliminary
Engineering
$621,929.50 $518,275.00 $51,827.00 $25,913.75 $25,913.75 Funding Source:

Funding Title Funding Required Budget Number
Measure L & CMAQ $621,929.50 6310-310-8293
Total $621,929.50
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This project is categorically exempted according to Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 19 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), in accordance with Section 15301 “Existing Facilities.”
ALTERNATIVES:

1. Council could choose to not award the “Yosemite and Pasadena Signalization Improvements.” Staff does not recommend this as Measure L funding, and the CMAQ Grant is available for this project.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Location Map
• Notice of Award
• Agreement
• Bid Log

F Street Overlay C-13

NOTICE OF AWARD
Description of Work: YOSEMITE AND PASADENA SIGNALIZATION IMPROVEMENTS To Tennyson Electric, LLC._________________________________________ (Contractor)
7275 National Dr. Suite A-2 Livermore CA, 94550_________________________ (Address)
Livermore, CA 94550_____________________________________________________________ (City, State, Zip)
The City of Waterford, (Owner), represented by the undersigned has considered the proposal submitted by you for the above-described work in response to its Notice to Contractors dated September 5, 2024.

It appears that it is to the best interest of said Owner to accept your Proposal in the amount of $Five Hundred and Eighteen Thousand, Two Hundred and Seventy Five Dollars (written description of contract amount)
($518,275.00) you are hereby notified that your Proposal has been accepted.

If you fail to execute said contract and to furnish bonds and certificates within 14 calendar days from the date of delivery of this Notice, said Owner will be entitled to consider all your rights arising out of the Owner’s acceptance of your Proposal as abandoned and to award the work covered by your Proposal to another, or to re-advertise the work or otherwise dispose thereof as the Owner may see fit.

Dated this 5th day of May ,2024.

OWNER: City of Waterford ACCEPTANCE OF NOTICE
Receipt of the above Notice of Award is hereby
acknowledged
This _______ day of ______________, 20___
By _______________________ By _________________________ Title: _____________________ Title: _______________________ F Street Overlay
C-1

A G R E E M E N T
FOR

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 2024-03
“YOSEMITE AND PASADENA SIGNALIZATION IMPROVEMENTS”
THIS AGREEMENT, is entered between the CITY OF WATERFORD, a Municipal Corporation, herein called "City", and Tennyson Electric, LLC, herein called "Contractor", on September 5, 2024.

RECITALS
(a) City hastaken appropriate proceedingsto authorize construction of the publicwork and improvements herein provided, and execution of this Agreement. (b) A notice was duly published for bids for the contract for the improvement hereinafter described.
(c) On September 5, 2024, after notice duly given, the City Council ofsaid City awarded the contract for the construction of the improvements hereinafter described to Contractor, which Contractor said Council found to be the lowest responsible bidder for said improvements.
(d) City and Contractor desire to enter into this Agreement for the construction of said improvements.

IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Scope of Work:

Contractor shall perform the work described briefly as follows:

All work as specified on the Plans and in the Special Provisions, dated September 5, 2024 for the project, Yosemite and Pasadena Signalization Improvements.

The aforesaid improvements are further describedin the plans,specifications and technicalrequirementsforsuch project, copies ofwhich are on file in the office of the City Engineer, previously provided to Contractor, and which are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth fully herein.

F Street Overlay
C-2

2. The Contract:

The complete contract consists of the following documents: This Agreement, the notice to contractors,the Contractor's accepted proposal, general conditions,special provisions, plans and detailed drawings, faithful performance bond and labor and materials bond and any and all supplemental agreements amending, decreasing, or extending the work contemplated or which may be required to complete the work in a satisfactory and acceptable manner. The Current Edition of the "City of Waterford Standard Specifications and Drawings" is hereby incorporated as a part of the contract.

All rights and obligations of City and Contractor are set forth and described in the contract.

All of the above named documents are intended to cooperate so that any work called for in one and not mentioned in the other, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if mentioned in all said documents. The documents comprising the complete contract will hereinafter be referred to as the "contract". In case of any dispute, the decision of the City Engineer shall be final.

3. Schedule:

All work shall be performed in accordance with the schedule provided by City Engineer, and under his direction.

4. Equipment & Performance of Work:

Contractor shall furnish all tools, equipment, facilities, labor and materials necessary to perform and complete in good workmanlike manner the work of general construction as called for and in the manner designated in and in strict conformity with the plans and specificationsforsaidwork,which said specifications are entitled, "General Conditions and Special Provisions for “2024-03 YOSEMITE AND PASADENA SIGNALIZATION IMPROVEMENTS”
The equipment, apparatus, facilities, labor and material shall be furnished, and said work performed and completed as required in said plans and specifications under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval, of the City Engineer of said City, or his designated agent.

5. Contract Price:

F Street Overlay
C-3

City shall pay, and Contractor shall accept in full payment for the work above agreed to be done, the sum of: Five Hundred and Eighteen Thousand, Two Hundred and Seventy Five Dollars ($518,275.00). Said price is determined by the unit prices contained in Contractor's bid. In the event work is performed or materials furnished in addition to those set forth in Contractor's bid and the specifications herein, said work and materials will be paid for at the unit price therein contained. Said amount shall be paid in installments as hereinafter provided.

6. Time for Performance:

The time fixed for the commencement of such work is ten (10) calendar days after the "Notice to Proceed" has been issued. The work on this project shall be completed on or before seventy-five (75) calendar days after the date of the "Notice to Proceed".

7. Rights of City to Increase Working Days:

If such work is not completed within such time, the City Council shall have the right to increase the number of working days in the amount it may determine will best serve the interests of the City, and if it desires to increase said number of working days, it shall have the further right to charge the Contractor and deduct from the final payment for the work the actual cost of engineering, inspection, superintendence, and other overhead expenses which are directly chargeable to Contractor, and which accrue during the period of such extension except that the cost ofthe finalservice and preparation ofthe final estimatesshall not be included in such charges; provided, however, that no extension of time for completion of such work shall ever be allowed unless requested by Contractor at least twenty (20) calendar days prior to the time herein fixed for the completion thereof, in writing, with the City Clerk, addressed to the City Council. In this connection, itis understood that the City Clerk shall not transmit any such request to the City Council if not filed within the time herein prescribed.

8. Option of City to Terminate Agreement in Event of Failure to CompleteWork:

If Contractorshall have refused orfailed to prosecute thework, or any severable part thereof, with such diligence aswill insure its completion within the time specified or any extensionsthereof, orshall have failed to complete saidworkwithin such time if Contractor should be adjudged a bankrupt, or if Contractor should make a general assignment for the benefit of Contractor's creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed in the event of Contractor's insolvency, or if Contractor or any subcontractor should violate any of the provisions of this Agreement, the City F Street Overlay
C-4

Engineer or the City Council may give written notice to Contractor and Contractor's sureties of itsintention to terminate this Agreement, and unless within five (5) days after the serving of such notice such violation shall cease and satisfactory arrangementsforthe correction thereofmade,this Agreementmay, atthe option of City, upon the expiration of said time, cease and terminate.

9. Liquidated Damages:

In the event Contractor for any reason shall have failed to perform the work herein specifiedwithin the time herein required and to the satisfaction ofthe City Engineer, City may, in lieu of any other of its rights authorized by paragraph 8 of this Agreement, deduct from payments or credits due Contractor after such breach, a sum equal to one thousand ($1,000) Dollars as liquidated damages for each calendar day beyond the date herein provided for the completion of suchwork.

10. Performance by Sureties:

In the event of any termination as herein‐before provided, City shall immediately givewritten notice thereof to Contractor and Contractor'ssureties, and the sureties shall have the right to take over and perform the Agreement; provided, however, that if the sureties within five (5) days after giving them said notice of termination, do not give the Citywritten notice of their intention to take over the performance of the Agreement and do not commence performance thereofwithin five (5) days after notice to the City of such election, City may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or by any other method it may deem advisable for the account, and at the expense of Contractor and the Suretiesshall be liable to City for any excess cost or damages occasioned City thereby; and, in such event, Citymay, without liability for so doing, take possession of and utilize in completing the work such materials, appliances, plant and other property belonging to Contractor asmay be on the site of the work and necessary therefore.

11. Disputes Pertaining to Payment for Work:

Should any dispute arise respecting the true value of any work done, of any work omitted, or of any extraworkwhich Contractor may be required to do, orrespecting the size of any payment to contractor during the performance of this contract,such dispute shall be decided by the City Engineer, and the decision of the latter shall be final and conclusive.

12. Permits, Compliance with Law:

Contractor shall, at Contractor's expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses forthe construction of each improvement, give all necessary notices and pay allfees and taxes required by law.

F Street Overlay
C-5

13. Superintendence by Contractor:

Contractorshall give personalsuperintendence to thework on said improvement or have a competent foreman or superintendent satisfactory to the City Engineer on the work at all times during progress, with authority to act for him.

14. Inspection by City:

Contractor shall at all times maintain proper facilities and provide safe access for inspection by City to all parts of the work and to the shops wherein the work is in preparation.

15. Extra and/or Additional Work and Changes:

Should City at any time during the progress of said work request any alterations, deviations, additions, or omissionsfromsaid specifications or plans or other contract documents, itshall be atliberty to do so, and the same shall in noway affect or make void the contract, butwill be added to or deducted from the amount ofsaid contract price asthe case may be, by fair and reasonable valuation. Request forsuch change must be made in writing signed by the City Engineer,shall be accompanied by plans and specifications for such propose, shall be accepted in writing by Contractor and Contractor's surety.

16. Inspection and Testing of Materials:

Contractor shall notify City a sufficient time in advance of the manufacture of production materials to be supplied by Contractor under this contract in order that Citymay arrange formill orfactory inspection and testing ofsame, asrequired by the City.

Any materialsshipped by Contractorfromfactory priorto having satisfactorily passed such testing and inspection by City's representative or prior to the receipt of notice from such representative that such testing and inspection will not be required shall not be incorporated on the job of said improvement.

Contractor shall also furnish City, in triplicate, certified copies of all factory and mill test reports upon request.

17. Permits and Care of the Work:

Contractor has examined the site of thework and isfamiliarwith itstopography and condition, location of property lines, easements, building lines, and other physical factors and limitations affecting the performance of this Agreement. Contractor, at F Street Overlay
C-6

Contractor's expense, shall obtain any permission necessary for any operations conducted off the property owned or controlled by City. Contractor shall be responsible for the proper care and protection of all materials delivered and work performed until completion and final acceptance.

18. Other Contracts:

City may award other contracts for additional work, and Contractor shall fully cooperate with such other Contractors and carefully fit Contractor's own work to that provided under other contracts as may be directed by the City Engineer.

Contractor shall not commit or permit any act which will interfere with the performance of work by any other Contractor.

19. Payments to Contractor:

Payments are to be made to the Contractor in accordance with the provisions of Section 9 of the General Conditions of said specifications in legally executed and regularly issued warrants of the City, drawn on the appropriate fund or funds as required by law and order of the City Council thereof.

20. Contract Security:

Concurrently with the execution hereof, Contractor shall furnish on the forms provided (1) a surety bond in an amount equal to at least one hundred percent (100%) ofthe contract price assecurity forthe faithful performance ofthis contract; and (2) a separate surety bond in an amount equal to at least one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price as security for the payment of all persons performing labor and furnishing materials in connection with this contract. Sureties on each of said bonds thereof shall be satisfactory to the City Manager.

21. Indemnity:

Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its officers, employees, agents and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, and cost (including, without limitation, reasonable legal counsel fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with Contractor’s negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct in the performance of work hereunder, or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except such loss or damage caused by the active negligence, sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement.

22. Contractor's Insurance:

F Street Overlay
C-7

(a) Minimum Limits of Insurance
(1) General Liability
Contractor shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, including without limitation, blanket contractual liability and coverage for explosion, collapse and underground property damage hazards. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. A combination of a general liability policy and excess liability policies may be utilized to achieve these limits. Contractor’s general liability policies shall be primary and shall not seek contribution from the City’s coverage, and be endorsed using Insurance Services Office form CG 20 10 to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents shall be additional insureds under such policies. An endorsement providing completed operations to the additional insured, ISO form CG 20 37, is also required.
(2) Auto Liability
Contractor shall provide auto liability coverage for owned, nonowned, and hired autos using ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01, or the exact equivalent, with a limit of no less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per accident.
(3) Workers’ Compensation
Contractor shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limits of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000). Contractor shall submit to City, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers.
(b) Deductibles and Self‐Insured Retention:

Any deductible or self‐insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible for self‐insured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers; or the Contractor shall post a security (including but not limited to cash, letter of credit, etc.) guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses.

F Street Overlay
C-8

(c) Other Insurance Provisions
The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverage (a) Any failure to complywith reporting provisions ofthe policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.
(b) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made for suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer'sliability. (2) All Coverage:
(a) Each insurance policy required by this section shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
(b) The Contractor shall require the subcontractors, if any, to take out and maintain similar Commercial General Liability and Property Damage Insurance.
(c) In case any of the work under this Contract is to be performed on, or at, the site of the project by the
subcontractor, the contractor shall take out and maintain such contractor's Contingent or Protective Insurance as will protect him, the Owner, and the Engineer from damage
claims arising from the operations of any subcontractor. (d) Acceptability of Insurer:

Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Best's rating of no less than A:VII.

In the event the form of any policy or certificate, or the amount of the insurance or the companies writing same are not satisfactory to the City, the Contractor shall furnish other policies or certificatesin form and amount, andwith companiessatisfactory to the City. The F Street Overlay
C-9

Contractor shall not cause any policies to be canceled or permit it to lapse, and all policies shall include a clause to the effect that the policy or certificate shall not be subject to cancellation or to a reduction in the required limits of liability or amounts of insurance until notice has been mailed to the City statingwhen, notlessthan ten (10) daysthereafter,such cancellation or reduction shall be effective. All certificates of insurance, authenticated by the proper officer of the insurer, shall state in particular those insured, the extent of the insurance, the location and operations to which the insurance applies, the expiration date, and the above‐mentioned notice of cancellation clause.

The Contractor shall furnish to the City at the date of delivering the signed contracts and bonds, certificates or riders duly executed on behalf of the surety company, certifying asto the amounts of insurance carried, and providing for the coverage therein of the City, its officers, agents, and employees, within all risks arising out of the project.

23. Proof of Carriage of Insurance:

Contractorshall furnish City on City Forms, through the City Engineer, concurrentlywith the execution hereof,with satisfactory proof of carriage ofthe insurance required, and thateach carrier shall give City at least thirty (30) days prior notice of the cancellation of any policy during the effective period of this contract.

24. Wages & Hours of Employment:

In the performance of this contract, eight (8) hoursshall be the maximum hours of labor on any calendar day, and the minimum wages of compensation of persons performing labor in the execution ofthis Agreementshall be the current prevailing scale ofwages determinedby the U.S. Secretary of Labor for the community and on file with the City Engineer.

The Contractorshall forfeit as penalty to the City, Twenty‐FiveDollars($25)to be paid to the City of Waterford for eachworkman employed in the execution of this Agreement by himor by any subcontractor, for each calendar day during which any workman is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours, in violation of provisions of Article 3, Chapter 1, Part 7, a Division 2, of the Labor Code of the State of California, and all amendments thereto.

25. Emergency ‐ Additional Time for Performance ‐ Procurement of Materials:

If, because of war or other declared national emergency, the Federal or State Government restricts,regulates, or controlsthe procurement and allocation oflaborormaterials,or both, and if solely because of said restrictions, regulations or controls, contractor is through no fault ofthe contractor, unable to performthis Agreement, orthework isthereby suspended or delayed, any of the following steps may be taken.
(a) City may, pursuant to resolution of the Council, grant Contractor additional time for the performance of this Agreement, sufficient to compensate in time, for delay or F Street Overlay
C-10

suspension.

To qualify for such extension in time, Contractor within ten (10) days of Contractor's discovering such inability to perform,shall notify City Engineerinwriting thereof, and give specific reasons therefore; City Engineer shall thereupon have sixty (60) days within which to procure such needed materials or labor as is specified in this Agreement, or permitsubstitution, or provide for changesin thework in accordance with other provisions of this Agreement. Substituted materials, or changes in the work, or both, shall be ordered in writing by City Engineer, and the concurrenceof the Council shall not be necessary. All reasonable expenses of such procurement incurred by the City Engineer shall be defrayed by the Contractor; or (b) If such materials or labor cannot be procured through legitimate channels within sixty (60) days after the filing of the aforesaid notice, either party may, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to the other, terminate this Agreement. In such event, Contractor shall be compensated for all work executed upon a unit basis in proportion to the amount of the work completed, or upon a cost‐plus ten percent (10%) basis, whichever is the lesser. Materials on the ground, in process of fabrication or in route upon the date of notice of termination specially ordered for the project andwhich cannot be utilized by Contractor,shall be compensated for by City at cost, including freight, provided the Contractorshall take allsteps possible to minimize this obligation; or
(c) City Council, by resolution,may suspend this Agreement untilthe cause ofinability to perform is removed but for a period of not to exceed sixty (60) days.

If this Agreement is not canceled, and the inability of Contractor to perform continues without fault on Contractor's part, beyond the time during which the Agreement may have been suspended, as hereinabove provided, City Council may further suspend this Agreement, or either party hereto may, without incurring any liability, electtodeclare this Agreementterminated upon the ground ofimpossibility of performance. In the event City declares this Agreement terminated, such declaration shall be authorized by the CityCouncil by resolution, and Contractorshall be notified in writing thereof within five (5) days after the adoption of such resolution. Upon such termination, Contractor shall be entitled to proportionate compensation atthe Agreementrate forsuch portion ofthe Agreement asmay have been performed, or
(d) City may terminate this Agreement, in which case Contractor shall be entitled to proportionate compensation atthe agreed rate forsuch portion oftheAgreement as may have been performed. Such termination shall be authorized by resolution ofthe Council. Notice thereof shall be forthwith given in writing to Contractor, and this Agreement shall be terminated upon receipt by Contractor of such notice. In the event of the termination provided in thissub‐paragraph (d), none of the covenants, conditions or provisions hereofshall apply to thework not performed, and City shall F Street Overlay
C-11

be liable to Contractor for the proportionate compensation last herein mentioned.

26. Provisions Cumulative:

The provisions of this Agreement are cumulative, and in addition to and not in limitation of, any other rights or remedies available to City.

27. Notices:

All notices shall be in writing and delivered in person or transmitted by certified mail, postage prepaid.

Notices required to be given to City shall be addressed as follows:

CITY MANAGER, CITY OF WATERFORD, P. O. BOX 199, WATERFORD, CA 95386 Notices required to be given to Contractor shall be addressed as follows:

Tennyson Electric, LLC.
7275 National Dr STE A-2
Livermore CA 94550
Phone 925-606-1038
Fax 925-606-7656 _
Notices required to be given sureties of Contractor shall be addressed as follows:

City of Waterford
101 E. Street
Waterford, Ca, 95386
Phone 209-874-2328
Fax 209-874-9656

F Street Overlay
C-12

28. Interpretation:

As used herein, any gender includes each other gender, the singular includes the plural and vice versa.

29. Anti‐Trust Claims:

The Contractor or subcontractor offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title and interest to any causes of action under Section Four of the Clayton Act and the Cartwright Act concerning anti‐trust claims.

INWITNESSWHEREOF,fouridentical counterpartsofthisAgreement, consisting of a totalof 12 pages, each of which counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed an original of said Agreement, have been duly executed by the parties hereinabove named, on the day and year first hereinabove written.

F Street Overlay
C-13

(Attach Contractor's
Notary Seal here)
By:

Contractor
Address:

Phone:

CITY OF WATERFORD,

A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
By:

Michael G. Pitcock, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: _
Federal Tax ID #
OR
Social Security #
Corbett Browning, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUFFICIENCY:

MCR ENGINEERING
By: _
Rob Marler, City Engineer
ATTEST:

By:

Patricia Krause ,CMC, City Clerk
OPENED
3:00pm

COMPANY NAME / BIDDERS BOND

CONTACT NAME AMOUNT OF BID BOND COMPANY CITY/STATE/ZIP
ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC $ 607,300.00 EVEREST NATIONAL DELAWARE PO BOX 2057 INSURANCE COMPANY
SAN LEANDRO CA 94577
PACIFIC EXCAVATION INC $ 598,992.00 GREAT AMERICAN
9796 KENT ST INSURANCE COMPANY OHIO
ELK GROVE CA 95624
BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS INC $ 778,500.00 HARCO NATIONAL PO BOX 924 INSURANCE COMPANY NORTH CAROLINA
ALVISO CA 95002

TENNYSON ELECTRIC LLC FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT
7275 NATIONAL DR STE A-2 $ 518,275.00 COMPANY OF MARYLAND MARYLAND LIVERMORE CA 94550

BID SHEET OPENING LOG
2024-03 YOSEMITE PASADENA SIGNALIZATION IMPROVEMENTS
BID OPENING: AUGUST 19, 2024 @ 3PM
Informational Items 8
September 5, 2024
Patricia Krause, City Clerk / Administrative Services Director City Council Staff Report
Informational Items.

SUMMARY:

Items included in this section provide City Council with updates on business not requiring a full report.

FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A
ANALYSIS:

All items under this category are considered for informational purpose only.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

N/A
ALTERNATIVES:

N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
8a: City Project List
Streets
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update
Yosemite Ave. Pedestrian Project (Caltrans) Michael Pitcock Lonnie Statzer High $6,000,000 (SHOPP) In Construction
F Street Overlay Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $1,500,000 (Measure L) Complete
F Street Improvements at Western Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $300,000 (STBG and CMAQ) Complete
Dorsey, Pecan and Western Pedestrian and Roadway Improvements Michael Pitcock Lonnie Statzer High $300,000 (CDBG) Complete
Yosemite Pedestrian Improvements Reinway to Eucalyptus Michael Pitcock Lonnie Statzer High $946,000 (ATP) In Design
Yosemite at Pasadena Signal Improvements Michael Pitcock Lonnie Statzer High $600,000 (CMAQ) Out to bid
Skyline Road Improvements Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $450,000 (STBG) Complete
Tim Bell Pedestrian Improvements Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $1,993,000 (ATP) Grant was approved/awarded to Waterford Housing Development
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update
Bentley Estates Michael Pitcock High NA Tentative Map Approved. Waiting on Developer.

Reinway North of Moon School Annexation Michael Pitcock High NA Application received. The developer is looking at a potential 95 homes
Waterstone A Michael Pitcock High NA Application received. The developer is looking at a potential 30 homes
Economic Development
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update
F St and Yosemite Fuel Station Michael Pitcock High N/A In Construction E Street Public Storage Michael Pitcock High N/A In Construction City Projects
Facilities / Property
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update
ADA Transition Plan Implementation Lonnie Statzer Low Varies Ongoing Local Hazardous Mitigation Plan Update Lonnie Statzer Low N/A Complete Council Chambers Equipment Upgrade Patricia Krause High $52,000 Complete Public Safety
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update
License Plate Reader Program Michael Pitcock High
$10,000 up front and $3,300
monthly for maintenance and
monitoring.

Complete
Utilities
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update
Sewer Rate Study Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $40,000 In the Prop 218 Process
WWTP Biosolids Screening Upgrade - Self Help Enterprises Grant
Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $500,000 Unfunded Grant Application submitted.

Water System Consolidation - Hickman Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $3,000,000 Unfunded Grant Application submitted.

Tim Bell Water and Sewer Extension to Vineyard Michael Pitcock Lonnie Statzer High $2,500,000 (ARPA) Complete
WWTP Road Repair Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $1,100,000 (FEMA) In Construction
Parks and Trails
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update
Triangle Parcel - Neighborhood Park Lonnie Statzer Low $133,000 Park Impact Fees On hold (No Funding) S. Reinway Sports Complex Lonnie Statzer Low Unfunded On hold (No Funding) Dog Park (Prop 68 Per Capita Grant) Lonnie Statzer High $250,000 Grant and Park Impact Fees Complete
Beard Park Improvements (Prop 68 Competitive Grant) Lonnie Statzer Low $1,000,000 Million Unfunded Grant Denied. Waiting to see if another cycle to apply is available.

Community Center Remodel Michael Pitcock
Lonnie Statzer High $800,000 (General Fund) In Construction Other Projects
Name Owner Priority Estimated Cost Update