Vol 66 Min-CC011425
261
14523, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $193,140; AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAME
9.i. RESOLUTION NO. 8-25 (CM)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE ACCEPTING
NATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION CLIMATE RESILIENCE REGIONAL CHALLENGE GRANT SUB-AWARD, IN THE AMOUNT OF $250,000 AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE, EXECUTE
SAME, AND APPRORIATE FUNDS TO THE SPECIAL GRANTS FUND
9.j. RESOLUTION NO. 9-25 (CM)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT THE UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE, FOR THE EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024, IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,759, TO FUND CRIME ANALYSIS SOFTWARE, TO EXECUTE A STANDARD AGREEMENT AND ANY NECESSARY DOCUMENTS; AND APPROPRIATING SUCH FUNDS TO THE SPECIAL GRANTS FUND (0260)
9.k. RESOLUTION NO. 10-25 (CM)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING A $250,000 GRANT FROM CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY GRANT DOCUMENTS; AND APPROPRIATING SUCH
FUNDS TO THE SPECIAL GRANTS FUND
9.l. RESOLUTION NO. 11-25 (CM)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE REVIEWING
AND ACCEPTING ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING ON JUNE 30, 2024, PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66006
9.m. RESOLUTION NO. 1-25 (SA)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE, ACTING AS
THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE, PURSUANT TO HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTIONS 34171(j) AND SECTIONS 34173, APPROVING A RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE PERIOD COMMENCING JULY 1, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026, AS REQUIRED BY HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTION 34177(l)(1)
9.n. RESOLUTION NO. 12-25 (CM)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE APPOINTING MEMBERS TO COMMITTEES FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2025
9.o. RESOLUTION NO. 13-25 (CM)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE APPOINTING
COUNCIL MEMBER JIMMY DUTRA TO THE SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR TERM COMMENCING ON JANUARY 1, 2025, AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2028
Attachment 4
5 of 12
Vol 66 Min-CC011425
262
9.p. RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 (CM)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE APPOINTING COUNCIL MEMBER PARKER AND MAYOR OROZCO AS ALTERNATE TO THE PÁJARO
REGIONAL FLOOD MANAGEMENT AGENCY JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
9.q. RESOLUTION NO. 15-25 (CM)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE APPOINTING
JORGE ZAMORA, POLICE CHIEF, TO THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY HOUSING FOR
HEALTH PARTNERSHIP POLICY BOARD
9.r. RESOLUTION NO. 16-25 (CM)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE APPOINTING
LOWELL HURST TO THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
9.s. RESOLUTION NO. 17-25 (CM)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE APPOINTING
LUCY ROJAS TO THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
9.t. RESOLUTION NO. 18-25 (CM)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE APPOINTING
NOE IBARRA TO THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION
9.u. RESOLUTION NO. 19-25 (CM)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE APPOINTING
PEDRO REYNOSO TO THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE LIBRARY COMMISSION
10. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA
11. REPORTS TO COUNCIL – No Action Required
11.a. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE REPORT
12. NEW BUSINESS (Continued)
12.a. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL HEALTHCARE BENEFITS 1) Staff Report by Deputy City Manager Manning and Administrative Services Director Duran
2) City Council Clarifying & Technical Questions
In answering Member Dutra, Deputy City Manager Manning spoke about the cost of the healthcare plan for employees and rate increases over the years.
Administrative Services Director Duran, in answering Member Parker, provided an explanation regarding the options and requirements for participating in the City’s health care plan.
City Manager Vides stated that Council was being asked whether they would like to create an Elected Coverage Group to be eligible to participate in the City’s healthcare plan.
Attachment 4
6 of 12
Vol 66 Min-CC011425
263
Administrative Services Director Duran gave additional details regarding the creation of the Elected Coverage Group.
In answering Member Parker, City Manager Vides stated an Elected Coverage Group could be created by Council in the future if they opted not to do so at this time.
City Attorney Zutler, in answering Member Dutra, stated the reasons Council could not negotiate for a lower cost than what City employees paid for healthcare coverage.
In answering Member Parker, City Attorney Zutler stated the procedure for creating the Elected Coverage Group would remain the same unless the City switched to a different healthcare plan.
3) Public Input – None
4) MOTION: It was moved by Member Parker, seconded by Member Clark, not to create the Elected Coverage Group.
5) City Council Deliberation on Motion
In answering Member Montesino, Administrative Services Director Duran stated that the City did not participate in the same health coverage plan as Pajaro Valley Unified School District.
City Manager Vides, in answering Member Clark, stated the City had a program administrator for its health coverage plan.
In answering Member Parker, City Manager Vides spoke about what forming an Elected Coverage Group would mean and options for individual Council members to opt out of the City’s healthcare coverage.
MOTION: The above motion carried by the following vote.
AYES: MEMBERS: Clark, Dutra, Parker, Orozco
NOES: MEMBERS: Montesino, Quiroz-Carter
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Salcido
6) RESOLUTION NO. 20-25 (CM) (FAILED)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE FORMING
AN ELECTED COVERAGE GROUP TO ALLOW CURRENT AND FUTURE CITY
COUNCIL MEMBERS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE HEALTH
CARE PLAN AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY TO
TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE SUCH PARTICIPATION
12.b. REAFFIRMING COMMITMENT TO MAINTAIN TRUST & SAFETY FOR LOCAL
IMMIGRANTS
1) Staff Report by Police Chief Zamora.
Community Action Board of Santa Cruz County (CAB) Immigration Project Program Director Kate Hinnenkamp was also available for questions.
Attachment 4
7 of 12
Vol 66 Min-CC011425
264
2) City Council Clarifying & Technical Questions
In answering Member Dutra, CAB Immigration Project Program Director Hinnenkamp spoke about efforts to inform people of their rights, should they encounter Immigration and Customs Enforcement or Customs and Border Protection agents.
Police Chief Zamora, in answering Member Clark, spoke about probable cause in relation to law enforcement’s ability to detain a person.
CAB Immigration Project Program Director Hinnenkamp further spoke about a person’s right to remain silent if detained by any law enforcement officer and education provided to people regarding exercising their rights.
3) Public Input
Rebecca Garcia, District 5, stated she had spoken to City Manager Vides regarding the possibility of reaffirming the City’s sanctuary city ordinance after the November Election.
She spoke about her work with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival (DACA) residents.
She requested Council include language in the proposed resolution specifically affirming support for them.
Pam Sexton, District 4, thanked Council for considering the item and spoke about her work educating immigrants regarding their rights and asked Council to support them as much as possible.
? male spoke about enforcing the law, including immigration laws.
Oscar Rios spoke in support of the proposed resolution. 4) MOTION: It was moved by Member Montesino, seconded by Member Dutra to approve the resolution listed under Item 12.b.6. below and add language referencing DACA recipients.
5) City Council Deliberation on Motion
Mayor Orozco expressed her support for Watsonville’s status as a sanctuary city and the importance of supporting immigrants. She thanked CAB and other community organizations for their efforts.
City Attorney Zutler recommended the following language regarding DACA recipients be added as requested by the maker of the motion to the proposed resolution:
Whereas, the City Council specifically states its support for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) residents.
MOTION: The above motion was carried by the following vote.
AYES: MEMBERS: Clark, Dutra, Montesino, Parker, Quiroz-Carter, Orozco NOES: MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Salcido
6) RESOLUTION NO. 21-25 (CM)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF Attachment 4
8 of 12
Vol 66 Min-CC011425
265
WATSONVILLE TO REAFFIRM COMMITMENT TO MAINTAIN TRUST AND SAFETY
FOR LOCAL IMMIGRANTS
12.c. CONSIDERATION OF OPTIONS FOR DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITY RESTRICTIONS 1) Oral Report by Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach 2) City Council Clarifying & Technical Questions
In answering Member Montesino, City Manager Vides stated that impacts of the potential closure of the Airport’s crosswind runway on drive-through facility restrictions were not yet known.
Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach, in answering Member Dutra, spoke about setback limits in surrounding cities.
In answering Member Parker, Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach provided details regarding the various options for modifying the drive-through facility restrictions that were currently in place. He spoke about existing locations of drive-through facilities.
3) Public Input
Bryan Martinez, District 7, requested the setback requirements remain in place and cited noise and pollution concerns.
Leann, District 7, requested Council keep the drive-through ordinance as is and spoke about why it was originally adopted. She expressed concerns with a proposed car wash project and reasons she was not in support of the drive-through ordinance being modified.
Steve McGee, District 7, stated he was not opposed to drive-throughs but was against noisy businesses being allowed in residential areas. He urged Council to keep the drivethrough ordinance intact and listed the reasons for his request.
Joan Garrett, District 7, spoke against a proposed car wash project and listed concerns with noise, traffic, and pedestrian safety.
William Hansen stressed the importance of tax revenue generated by businesses. He spoke about challenges with property lines and setback requirements in the current ordinance. He provided reasons why his proposed car wash project would not negatively impact the surrounding neighborhood and asked that Council consider modifying setback requirements for drive-throughs.
In answering Member Montesino, Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach provided a summary of the options for making changes to the drive-through ordinance.
4) 1
st MOTION: It was moved by Member Quiroz-Carter, seconded by Mayor Orozco, to exempt the Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) zoning district from the 150-foot setback requirement.
5) City Council Deliberation on Motion
Attachment 4
9 of 12
Vol 66 Min-CC011425
266
Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach, in answering Member Parker, spoke about the special use permitting process, including appeal procedures and the timeline for completing the process. He stated only the Thoroughfare Commercial zoning district would be exempt from the 150-foot setback per the staff recommendation and spoke about exploring additional options for exemptions. 2 nd MOTION; It was moved by Member Montesino, seconded by Member Clark, to exempt the following commercial zoning districts from the 150-foot setback requirement: CT (Thoroughfare Commercial), CNS (Neighborhood Shopping Center), and CV (Visitor Commercial).
City Manager Vides stated that property owners could apply for rezoning of their properties. She answered Member Dutra’s question regarding what zoning districts would be exempt from the setback requirement based on Council’s direction.
City Attorney Zutler stated that staff would draft an ordinance based on Council’s recommendation to be taken to the Planning Commission before being taken back to Council for consideration.
Member Dutra expressed concerns with restrictions of the urban limit line on growth opportunities.
Member Clark stated concerns with placing too many restrictions on businesses that could potentially generate tax revenue for the City.
Member Parker requested additional information regarding options for setback requirements be provided to the Planning Commission and Council when the item is taken for consideration.
City Manager Vides spoke about the extensive staff time that would be required to provide the additional information requested by Member Parker.
In answering Member Parker, City Manager Vides and Interim Community Development Director Orbach spoke about mitigation measures and conditions of approval for proposed projects.
2 nd MOTION: The above motion was carried by the following vote.
AYES: MEMBERS: Clark, Dutra, Montesino, Parker, Orozco
NOES: MEMBERS: Quiroz-Carter
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Salcido
1 st MOTION: The first motion failed by the following vote:
AYES: MEMBERS: Quiroz-Carter, Orozco
NOES: MEMBERS: Clark, Dutra, Montesino, Parker
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Salcido
City Clerk Ortiz clarified for Council that staff would be drafting an ordinance to exempt the following commercial zoning districts from the 150-foot setback requirement: CT (Thoroughfare Commercial), CNS (Neighborhood Shopping Center), and CV (Visitor Attachment 4
10 of 12
Vol 66 Min-CC011425
267
Commercial). He explained to the public that there was confusion with the vote, but staff understood staff direction.
12.d. CONSIDERATION OF COMMISSION VACANCY APPLICATION PROCESS 1) Staff Report by City Clerk Ortiz
2) City Council Clarifying & Technical Questions
In answering Member Clark, City Clerk Ortiz stated Council could choose to remove a commissioner in the event they provide false information regarding their place of residence. City Clerk Ortiz provided additional options for obtaining proof of residence.
City Attorney Zutler, in answering Member Parker, stated it would be the decision of the district attorney whether to prosecute someone who falsely signed an affidavit regarding their place of residence.
In answering Member Parker, City Clerk Ortiz stated that Council could choose any combination of address verification methods for commission applicants. He spoke about potential delays in appointing commissioners if there were extensive requirements put in place.
City Manager Vides provided further clarification regarding the possible documentation that could be required to verify the addresses of applicants.
Mayor Orozco stated Measure V was intended to increase civic engagement and stated she was in favor of requiring a signed affidavit of residency on commission applications without having to provide proof of residency.
3) Public Input – None
4) MOTION: It was moved by Mayor Orozco, seconded by Member Dutra to only require a signed affidavit of residency on commission applications for verification of address for commission applicants.
5) City Council Deliberation on Motion
In answering Member Parker, City Clerk Ortiz stated the reasons for listing various examples of documents that could be used to verify an applicant's address in the proposed resolution.
MOTION: The above motion was carried by the following vote.
AYES: MEMBERS: Dutra, Montesino, Quiroz-Carter, Orozco
NOES: MEMBERS: Clark, Parker
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Salcido
6) RESOLUTION NO. 22-25 (CM)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE
ESTABLISHING PROCEDURE FOR VERIFICATION OF ADDRESS FOR COMMISSION
APPLICANTS
13. EMERGENCY ITEMS ADDED TO AGENDA – None
Attachment 4
11 of 12
Vol 66 Min-CC011425
268
14. REQUESTS & SCHEDULING FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Member Quiroz-Carter requested a presentation from Ecology Action regarding a trip to the Netherlands that she had participated in with officials from other jurisdictions. She requested the findings of the traffic study conducted at Lincoln and East Fifth Streets be presented.
Member Montesino requested an item regarding striping on Beach Road and Walker Street.
15. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:23 p.m.
______________________________
Maria Orozco, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Irwin I. Ortiz, City Clerk
Attachment 4
12 of 12
UNADOPTED MINUTES 4.A.
1 M I N U T E S
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE
February 10, 2025 6:09 PM
In accordance with City policy, all Planning Commission meetings are recorded on audio and video in their entirety and are available for review in the Community Development Department (CDD). These minutes are a summary of the action taken.
1. ROLL CALL
Chair Ed Acosta, Vice-Chair Peter Radin, and Commissioners Daniel Dodge, Lowell Hurst, Lucy Rojas, and Jennifer Veitch-Olson were present. Commissioner Brando Sencion was absent.
A. MOTION TO EXCUSE ABSENT PLANNING COMMISSIONERS (IF ANY) MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Hurst, seconded by Commissioner Veitch-Olson, and carried by the following vote to excuse Commissioner Sencion:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Dodge, Hurst, Veitch-Olson
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sencion
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Acosta, Radin, Rojas
Staff members present were Interim Community Development Director Justin Meek, Interim Assistant Community Development Director Matt Orbach, Assistant City Attorney Denise Bazzano, Administrative Analyst Elena Ortiz, Permit Technician Rob Manansala, and City Interpreter Carlos Landaverry.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Dodge led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. PRESENTATIONS & ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
City Clerk Irwin Ortiz shared that an ethics training will be taking place at the next City Council meeting on February 25, 2025. City Clerk added the City Charter has been revised and is accepting applications for different boards and commissions.
B. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE COMMISSION
Commissioner Hurst introduced himself to the Commissioners and public.
UNADOPTED MINUTES 4.A.
2 Commissioner Dodge welcomed Hurst and shared a supporting comment regarding Watsonville being a Sanctuary City.
4. CONSENT AGENDA
A. MOTION APPROVING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 3, 2024, REGULAR MEETING
PUBLIC INPUT
None
MOTION: It was moved by Vice-Chair Radin, seconded by Commissioner Rojas, and carried by the following vote to approve the Consent Agenda:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Acosta, Dodge, Hurst, Radin, Rojas, Veitch-Olson
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sencion
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONSIDERATION OF A ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 14- 41 (DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITY RESTRICTIONS) OF THE WATSONVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE TO REMOVE THE 150-FOOT RESIDENTIAL SETBACK
REQUIREMENT FROM THE THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL (CT),
NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER (CNS), AND VISITOR COMMERCIAL (CV) ZONING DISTRICTS
1) Staff Report
Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach gave the presentation.
2) Planning Commission Clarifying & Technical Questions Commissioner Hurst asked for a relative example of what 150-foot-distance looks like. In answering, the Interim Community Development Director Meek explained it’s the depth of a standard residential lot and simplified it to fifty yards.
Commissioner Dodge inquired where the 150-foot setback mark starts. In answering, Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach clarified it starts at the boundary of the adjacent residentially zoned parcel.
Commissioner Dodge inquired how the recommendation fit into the City’s General Plan Update. In answering, Interim Community Development Director Meek shared the different zoning districts and explained the corridors this recommendation will apply to for further infill and growth.
UNADOPTED MINUTES 4.A.
3 Commissioner Dodge further inquired if the recommendation has any effect on the Caltrans projects. In answering, Interim Assistant Community Development Director explained that the Caltrans projects such as auto-oriented uses, arterials and commercial thoroughfares, and other uses have been taken into consideration.
Commissioner Rojas asked for if there is another Municipal Code that indicates an existing minimum range of setback around residential areas. In answering, Interim Assistant Community Development Director explained there are setback requirements for development of structures on property. The difference is the current setback holds restrictions on drive-through lane, menu board, and pickup windows.
Commissioner Rojas asked for clarification on the outcome of the Commission's decision. In answering, Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach explained the Planning Commission is making a recommendation to Council to make the change for a consideration of a first and a second reading.
Interim Community Development Director Meek added further information regarding setback requirements.
Commissioner Dodge shared an example of streets with no setbacks and inquired if the zoning regulations would allow structures to be developed in the same way. In answer to Commissioner Dodge’s inquiry, Interim Community Development Director Meek shared the setbacks requirements for new development, with a minimum setback of 15 feet.
Commissioner Hurst shared a comment regarding the 150-foot setback and asked to reference what the findings were that established the length of setback as part of the Chapter. Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach explained the analysis in the staff report identified the desire to reduce negative impacts of automobile use around residential areas that create nuisance complaints.
Commissioner Veitch-Olson shared a comment referencing a project that requested and exemption for a drive-through setback and was considered by the Planning Commission. She reminded Commissioners that there has been existing public input that do not support more drive-throughs.
Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach shared all Interested Parties were informed via Public Hearing Notice of the Zoning Code Text Amendment.
Vice Chair Radin shared a comment regarding the order of events that involve Planning Commission and City Council decisions pertaining to this item and asked if he was correct. Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach clarified there are two tracks and further explained the timeline of events.
UNADOPTED MINUTES 4.A.
4 Vice Chair Radin inquired if the current Ordinance had been adopted since 2001, and Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach clarified it was adopted in year 2000. Vice Chair Radin further shared a comment regarding the nature of the town changing.
Commissioner Rojas asked for clarification regarding a related project to this item that was pulled from the meeting. Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach answered this is the first time the Drive-through Ordinance is being presented to the Planning Commission. The project being inquired will be the following item in the Agenda, item 5.B.
Commissioner Dodge further explained that the current item is deciding on the 150-foot setback.
Commissioner Rojas shared a comment explaining the current Drive-Through Ordinance is relative to the project that had been presented. In clarifying, Assistant City Attorney Bazzano confirmed this is a legislative action and it is a separate track distinct from the project that Planning Commission previously considered.
In further answering Commissioner Rojas, Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach shared the Zoning Map that described the zones related to the removal of the setback requirements.
Commissioner Hurst inquired if Pharmacy’s are considered drive-throughs, Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach confirmed that is correct.
3) Public Hearing
Chair Acosta opened the public hearing.
William Hansen shared a comment regarding Neighborhood Commercial (CN), Zoning recommendation, and Drive-Through Ordinance recommendations.
Hearing no further comments, Chair Acosta closed the public hearing. 4) Appropriate Motion(s)
MAIN MOTION: It was moved by Vice Chair Radin, seconded by Commissioner Dodge, and carried by the following vote to approve the following recommendation:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-25 (PC)
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14-41 (DRIVETHROUGH FACILITY RESTRICTIONS) OF THE WATSONVILLE MUNICIPAL
UNADOPTED MINUTES 4.A.
5 CODE TO REMOVE THE 150-FOOT RESIDENTIAL SETBACK
REQUIREMENT FROM THE THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL (CT),
NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER (CNS), AND VISITOR COMMERCIAL (CV) ZONING DISTRICTS
5) Deliberation
Commissioner Dodge shared a comment in support of the project.
Commissioner Hurst shared a comment regarding the drive-throughs and expressed his concern regarding the removal of 150-feet setback buffer.
Vice Chair Radin shared a comment in support of the item and acknowledged the involvement of the community.
6) Chair Calls for a Vote on Motion(s)
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Dodge, Radin, Rojas, Acosta
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Hurst, Veitch-Olson
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sencion
B. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (PP2025-8346) CHANGING THE ZONING MAP DESIGNATION
FROM NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER TO THOROUGHFARE
COMMERCIAL FOR A 1.18± ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 632 EAST LAKE AVENUE (APN: 017-321-02), FILED BY VANCE SHANNON, APPLICANT, ON
BEHALF OF BILL HANSEN, PROPERTY OWNER
1) Staff Report
Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach gave the presentation.
2) Planning Commission Clarifying & Technical Questions Commissioner Dodge inquired if the project is consistent with the existing land use. Interim Assistant Community Development Director Orbach confirmed that is correct.
Commissioner Hurst asked if Caltrans has been consulted in the state highway network. In answering, Assistant Community Development Director Meek clarified Caltrans will be consulted for development projects concerning the state highway system, but not for Zoning changes.
3) Applicant Presentation
William Hansen with Pacific Coast Development gave the presentation. 4) Planning Commission Clarifying & Technical Questions
UNADOPTED MINUTES 4.A.
6 None
5) Public Hearing
Chair Acosta opened the public hearing.
Hearing no comments, Chair Acosta closed the public hearing. 6) Appropriate Motion(s)
MAIN MOTION: It was moved by Commissioner Hurst, seconded by Commissioner Radin, and carried by the following vote to approve the following recommendation:
RESOLUTION NO. 03-25 (PC)
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL LOCATED AT 632 EAST LAKE AVENUE (APN: 017-321-02) FROM NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER (CNS) TO THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL (CT), FILED BY VANCE
SHANNON, APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF BILL HANSEN, PROPERTY
OWNER; AND FINDING THE ZONING MAP AMENDMENT EXEMPT FROM
REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
(CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES § 15061(B)(3)
7) Deliberation
None
8) Chair Calls for a Vote on Motion(s)
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Dodge, Hurst, Radin, Rojas, Veitch-Olson, Acosta
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sencion
Assistant City Attorney Bazzano read the appeal language.
6. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY
Interim Community Development Director Meek shared that the City will provide a joint ethics training on February 25, 2025. Interim Director Meek also reported that the Notice of Preparation for the General Plan EIR went out for a second time to Commissioners and Interested Parties and a second Scoping Meeting will happen on February 18, at 1:00 PM, via zoom meeting.
7. ADJOURNMENT
UNADOPTED MINUTES 4.A.
7 Chairperson Acosta adjourned the meeting at 7:21 PM. The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for March 4, 2025, at 6:00 PM. ________________________ ________________________________ Justin Meek, Secretary Ed Acosta, Chair
Planning Commission Planning Commission
1 of 6
RESOLUTION NO. 03-25 (PC)
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE
ZONING DESIGNATION OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL LOCATED AT 632 EAST LAKE AVENUE (APN: 017-321-02) FROM NEIGHBORHOOD
SHOPPING CENTER (CNS) TO THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL (CT),
FILED BY VANCE SHANNON, APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF BILL
HANSEN, PROPERTY OWNER; AND FINDING THE ZONING MAP
AMENDMENT EXEMPT FROM REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA
GUIDELINES § 15061(B)(3)
Project: Zoning Map Amendment for 632 East Lake Avenue
APN: 017-321-02
WHEREAS, the subject parcel located at 632 East Lake Avenue (APN: 017-321- 02) was established via the Esther Rodgers Trust map 3314 O.R. 05. In 1870, a singlefamily residence known as the Rodgers House was constructed. The single-family residence remained on the property until 1998 when the historic residence was relocated to the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds; and
WHEREAS, the project site is designated General Commercial on the General Plan Land Use Map and is located within the Neighborhood Shopping Center (CNS) zoning district; and
WHEREAS, on December 8, 2023, Vance Shannon with Quick Quack Car Wash, on behalf of property owner, Bill Hansen, submitted an application for a Zoning Map Amendment (PP2023-6377) to change the zoning designation of a parcel located at 632 East Lake Avenue (APN: 017-321-02) from Neighborhood Shopping Center (CNS) to Thoroughfare Commercial (CT); and
WHEREAS, on October 22, 2024, City staff presented an overview of Chapter 14- 41 Drive-Through Facilities Restrictions to the City Council for review and discussion.
Docusign Envelope ID: 64910B62-9827-4353-AB23-14233F26F3D4 Attachment 6
2 of 6
City Council provided direction to staff to bring back an analysis of modification options to Council for review; and
WHEREAS, on November 19, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for application #PP2023-6377. The four members of the Planning Commission present at the meeting discussed the item and made a motion to continue the item to a date uncertain, with direction to City staff to try to identify a date before the end of 2024 to bring the item back for discussion with a full Planning Commission in attendance. Staff identified several potential meeting dates meeting this criteria and polled Planning Commissioners on their availability, but a quorum was not available on any of the dates identified. As such, the project was scheduled for the next available public hearing on January 7, 2025; and
WHEREAS, on January 7, 2025, the property owner pulled application #PP2023- 6377 from the Planning Commission meeting agenda; and
WHEREAS, on January 14, 2025, City staff presented options for modification of Chapter 14-41 Drive-Through Facility Restrictions to the City Council for review, discussion, and direction. City Council directed staff to bring an ordinance modifying Chapter 14-41 to exclude the Thoroughfare Commercial (CT), Neighborhood Shopping Center (CNS), and Visitor Commercial (CV) zoning districts from the 150-foot setback requirement in WMC § 14-41.100(a)(1) to Planning Commission for consideration and recommendation to City Council; and
WHEREAS, on January 16, 2025, the property owner submitted application #PP2025-8346 for a Zoning Map Amendment changing the zoning map designation from Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center (CNS) to Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) for a 1.18± acre parcel located at 632 East Lake Avenue (APN: 017-321-02); and Docusign Envelope ID: 64910B62-9827-4353-AB23-14233F26F3D4 Attachment 6
3 of 6
WHEREAS, City Staff reviewed the project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined that the project qualifies for a common sense exemption under California Code of Regulations Title 14, §15061(b)(3) because the Zoning Map Amendment does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment and it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the amendment may have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, notice of time and place of the hearing to consider approval of Application No. PP2023-5966 was given at the time and in the manner where appropriate public noticing procedures have been followed and a public hearing was held according to Part 9: Public Hearing Notice Provisions of Chapter 14-10: Administration and Procedure of the Watsonville Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all evidence received, both oral and documentary, and the matter was submitted for decision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Watsonville, California, as follows:
Good cause appearing, the Planning Commission of the City of Watsonville does hereby find the project exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the common sense exemption in California Code of Regulations Title 14, §15061(b)(3).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Planning Commission hereby makes the findings required by Watsonville Municipal Code §14-12.807, attached hereto and marked as Exhibit “A” and recommends the City Council approve an amendment to the Zoning Map changing the Zoning Map designation for the 1.18-acre parcel located at 632 East Lake Avenue (APN: 017-321-02) from Neighborhood Shopping Center (CNS) to Thoroughfare Commercial (CT).
Docusign Envelope ID: 64910B62-9827-4353-AB23-14233F26F3D4 Attachment 6
4 of 6
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Watsonville, California, held on the 10th day of February 2025, by Commissioner Hurst, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Commissioner Radin, was upon roll call, carried and the resolution adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Commissioners: Acosta, Dodge, Hurst, Radin, Rojas, Veitch-Olson Noes: Commissioners: None
Absent: Commissioners: Sencion
_________________________________ _______________________________ Justin Meek, Secretary Ed Acosta, Chairperson
Planning Commission Planning Commission
Docusign Envelope ID: 64910B62-9827-4353-AB23-14233F26F3D4 Attachment 6
5 of 6
CITY OF WATSONVILLE EXHIBIT “A”
PLANNING COMMISSION
Application No.: PP2025-8346
APN: 017-321-02
Applicant: Vance Shannon
Hearing Date: 02/10/2025
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FINDINGS (WMC §14-12.807)
Approval of a Zoning Map Amendment requires the approving body to make the following findings. Project-specific supportive evidence is included under each finding. a) The proposed amendment is consistent with the policies embodied in the General Plan;
Supportive Evidence
The proposed project is consistent with the following General Plan goals, policies and implementation measures concerning land use compatibility, design, and site improvement, per the staff analysis below.
Land Use Element Goal 4.2 Neighborhoods - Conserve and improve the living environment of Watsonville neighborhoods.
Supportive Evidence: The proposed rezoning would permit additional uses on the parcel that are consistent with the permitted uses of the adjacent parcel located at 952 East Lake Avenue, which has a zoning designation of CT. The rezoning would provide additional development potential on the parcel, increasing the chance that development will occur, and development of the vacant lot would improve the living environment of Watsonville neighborhoods.
Land Use Element Goal 4.7 Land Use Suitability - Ensure that the orderly development of land for the needs of the existing and projected population within the City limit and Sphere of Influence is based on the land's overall suitability, including: the accessibility of existing and proposed public facilities, services, and utilities, physical and financial constraints; and/or growth inducing impacts.
Supportive Evidence: The parcel located at 632 East Lake Avenue is located within the CNS Zoning District, in which some common business types are not principally or conditionally permitted. Rezoning the parcel from CNS to CT, where a larger variety of uses are principally and conditionally permitted would permit uses that are complementary to the existing uses at the adjacent parcel at 952 East Lake Avenue, which is zoned CT. The proposed zoning would also allow for the establishment of certain uses that are not readily available within a few miles of the subject parcel. Land Use Element Policy 4.G Land Use Suitability - The City shall encourage the development of urban uses on those lands best suited for urban uses and discourage it on lands unsuited for urban uses.
Docusign Envelope ID: 64910B62-9827-4353-AB23-14233F26F3D4 Attachment 6
6 of 6
Supportive Evidence: The subject parcel located at 632 East Lake Avenue is located along one of the City’s main commercial thoroughfares (East Lake Avenue/SR-152), provides convenient vehicular access and parking for the public, has a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial, and is bordered by parcels in the CT and CNS zoning districts. The rezoning of the parcel from the CNS to the CT zoning district will encourage the development of urban uses on lands well suited for urban uses.
In summary, the proposed zoning map amendment would be in harmony with the overall intent of the City's General Plan land use goals and policies. b) The proposed use is compatible to the extent possible with the actual and general planned use of the adjacent properties.
Supportive Evidence
The parcel at 632 East Lake Avenue and the adjacent commercial parcels have a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment would change the zoning district from CNS to CT. The parcel is located adjacent to 952 East Lake Avenue, which has a zoning designation of CT, so changing the zoning designation of 632 East Lake Avenue to CT would be compatible and consistent with the zoning of the adjacent parcels. In addition, the project site is located along a major thoroughfare within the City of Watsonville (East Lake Avenue/SR-152) and provides convenient vehicular access and parking for the public, which is consistent with the purpose of the CT zoning district.
Docusign Envelope ID: 64910B62-9827-4353-AB23-14233F26F3D4 Attachment 6
1 Reso No. ______ (CM)
Meeting Date: 031125 SWZ ______ TV ______ CDD ______
ORDINANCE NO. Introduction (CM)
AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WATSONVILLE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO DESIGNATE
THE PARCEL LOCATED AT 632 EAST LAKE AVENUE (APN: 017-321- 02) THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL (CT) AND DIRECTING CHANGES
ON THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE
Project: Zoning Map Amendment for 632 East Lake Avenue
APN: 017-321-02
WHEREAS, the subject parcel located at 632 East Lake Avenue (APN: 017-321- 02) was established via the Esther Rodgers Trust map 3314 O.R. 05. In 1870, a singlefamily residence known as the Rodgers House was constructed. The single-family residence remained on the property until 1998 when the historic residence was relocated to the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds; and
WHEREAS, the project site is designated General Commercial on the General Plan Land Use Map and is located within the Neighborhood Shopping Center (CNS) zoning district; and
WHEREAS, on December 8, 2023, Vance Shannon with Quick Quack Car Wash, on behalf of property owner, Bill Hansen, submitted an application for a Zoning Map Amendment (PP2023-6377) to change the zoning designation of a parcel located at 632 East Lake Avenue (APN: 017-321-02) from Neighborhood Shopping Center (CNS) to Thoroughfare Commercial (CT); and
WHEREAS, on October 22, 2024, City staff presented an overview of Chapter 14- 41 Drive-Through Facilities Restrictions to the City Council for review and discussion.
City Council provided direction to staff to bring back an analysis of modification options to Council for review; and
2 Reso No. ______ (CM)
Meeting Date: 031125
WHEREAS, on November 19, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for application #PP2023-6377. The four members of the Planning Commission present at the meeting discussed the item and made a motion to continue the item to a date uncertain, with direction to City staff to try to identify a date before the end of 2024 to bring the item back for discussion with a full Planning Commission in attendance. Staff identified several potential meeting dates meeting this criteria and polled Planning Commissioners on their availability, but a quorum was not available on any of the dates identified. As such, the project was scheduled for the next available public hearing on January 7, 2025; and
WHEREAS, on January 7, 2025, the property owner pulled application #PP2023- 6377 from the Planning Commission meeting agenda; and
WHEREAS, on January 14, 2025, City staff presented options for modification of Chapter 14-41 Drive-Through Facility Restrictions to the City Council for review, discussion, and direction. City Council directed staff to bring an ordinance modifying Chapter 14-41 to exclude the Thoroughfare Commercial (CT), Neighborhood Shopping Center (CNS), and Visitor Commercial (CV) zoning districts from the 150-foot setback requirement in WMC § 14-41.100(a)(1) to Planning Commission for consideration and recommendation to City Council; and
WHEREAS, on January 16, 2025, the property owner submitted application #PP2025-8346 for a Zoning Map Amendment changing the zoning map designation from Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center (CNS) to Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) for a 1.18± acre parcel located at 632 East Lake Avenue (APN: 017-321-02); and
3 Reso No. ______ (CM)
Meeting Date: 031125
WHEREAS, on February 10, 2025, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 03-25 (PC), recommending to City Council approval of a Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning designation of the subject parcel located at 632 East Lake Avenue (APN: 017-321-02) from Neighborhood Shopping Center (CNS) to Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) and finding the Zoning Map Amendment exempt from review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); and WHEREAS, City Staff reviewed the project under CEQA and determined that the project qualifies for a common sense exemption under California Code of Regulations Title 14, §15061(b)(3) because the Zoning Map Amendment does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment and it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the amendment may have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, notice of time and place of the hearing to consider approval of Application No. PP2023-5966 was given at the time and in the manner where appropriate public noticing procedures have been followed and a public hearing was held according to Part 9: Public Hearing Notice Provisions of Chapter 14-10: Administration and Procedure of the Watsonville Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all evidence received, both oral and documentary, and the matter was submitted for decision.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: RECITALS.
The foregoing recitals are adopted herein as true and correct and as the basis for this ordinance.
4 Reso No. ______ (CM)
Meeting Date: 031125
SECTION 2: ENACTMENT.
1. That the City Council of the City of Watsonville does hereby adopt a Zoning Map Amendment, changing the zoning to Thoroughfare Commercial for Santa Cruz County Assessor’s Parcel Number 017-321-02 and has made findings, attached hereto and marked as “Exhibit A”, for the property located at 632 East Lake Avenue, Watsonville, California.
2. That the City Clerk of the City of Watsonville is hereby authorized and directed to make the changes shown upon the official “Zoning Map of the City of Watsonville” which is attached hereto and hereinafter incorporated by reference as Exhibit “B” and to designate the effective date and number of the ordinance authorizing the change.
SECTION 3: CEQA.
Thie City Council of the City of Watsonville does find the project exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the common sense exemption in California Code of Regulations Title 14, §15061(b)(3).
SECTION 4: PUBLICATION.
This ordinance shall be published in the Watsonville Register-Pajaronian and/or Santa Cruz Sentinel in compliance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of Watsonville.
SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its final adoption. ***************************************
1 CITY OF WATSONVILLE EXHIBIT “A”
PLANNING COMMISSION
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FINDINGS (WMC §14-12.807)
Approval of a Zoning Map Amendment requires the approving body to make the following findings. Project-specific supportive evidence is included under each finding. a) The proposed amendment is consistent with the policies embodied in the General Plan;
Supportive Evidence
The proposed project is consistent with the following General Plan goals, policies and implementation measures concerning land use compatibility, design, and site improvement, per the staff analysis below.
Land Use Element Goal 4.2 Neighborhoods - Conserve and improve the living environment of Watsonville neighborhoods.
Supportive Evidence: The proposed rezoning would permit additional uses on the parcel that are consistent with the permitted uses of the adjacent parcel located at 952 East Lake Avenue, which has a zoning designation of CT. The rezoning would provide additional development potential on the parcel, increasing the chance that development will occur, and development of the vacant lot would improve the living environment of Watsonville neighborhoods.
Land Use Element Goal 4.7 Land Use Suitability - Ensure that the orderly development of land for the needs of the existing and projected population within the City limit and Sphere of Influence is based on the land's overall suitability, including: the accessibility of existing and proposed public facilities, services, and utilities, physical and financial constraints; and/or growth inducing impacts.
Supportive Evidence: The parcel located at 632 East Lake Avenue is located within the CNS Zoning District, in which some common business types are not principally or conditionally permitted. Rezoning the parcel from CNS to CT, where a larger variety of uses are principally and conditionally permitted would permit uses that are complementary to the existing uses at the adjacent parcel at 952 East Lake Avenue, which is zoned CT. The proposed zoning would also allow for the establishment of certain uses that are not readily available within a few miles of the subject parcel. Land Use Element Policy 4.G Land Use Suitability - The City shall encourage the development of urban uses on those lands best suited for urban uses and discourage it on lands unsuited for urban uses.
2 Supportive Evidence: The subject parcel located at 632 East Lake Avenue is located along one of the City’s main commercial thoroughfares (East Lake Avenue/SR-152), provides convenient vehicular access and parking for the public, has a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial, and is bordered by parcels in the CT and CNS zoning districts. The rezoning of the parcel from the CNS to the CT zoning district will encourage the development of urban uses on lands well suited for urban uses.
In summary, the proposed zoning map amendment would be in harmony with the overall intent of the City's General Plan land use goals and policies. b) The proposed use is compatible to the extent possible with the actual and general planned use of the adjacent properties.
Supportive Evidence
The parcel at 632 East Lake Avenue and the adjacent commercial parcels have a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment would change the zoning district from CNS to CT. The parcel is located adjacent to 952 East Lake Avenue, which has a zoning designation of CT, so changing the zoning designation of 632 East Lake Avenue to CT would be compatible and consistent with the zoning of the adjacent parcels. In addition, the project site is located along a major thoroughfare within the City of Watsonville (East Lake Avenue/SR-152) and provides convenient vehicular access and parking for the public, which is consistent with the purpose of the CT zoning district.
1 CITY OF WATSONVILLE EXHIBIT “B”
PLANNING COMMISSION
Proposed Zoning Map Amendment – 632 East Lake Avenue (APN: 017-321-02) Current Zoning
Districts
Proposed Zoning
Districts
APPROVAL OF A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (PP2025-8346)
CHANGING THE ZONING MAP DESIGNATION FROM
NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER (CNS) TO THOROUGHFARE
COMMERCIAL (CT) FOR A 1.18-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 632 EAST LAKE AVENUE (APN: 017-321-02)
CITY COUNCIL | 03/11/2025
INTERIM ASSISTANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ORBACH 632 East Lake Avenue
OVERVIEW
• PROJECT SITE
• BACKGROUND
• ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
• FINDINGS
• RECOMMENDATION
PROJECT SITE
632 EAST LAKE AVENUE
GENERAL PLAN: GENERAL
COMMERCIAL
ZONING DISTRICT: NEIGHBORHOOD
SHOPPING CENTER (CNS)
Shopping
Center
Multifamily
Residential
Vacant
Office
Vacant
BACKGROUND
• 632 EAST LAKE AVE WAS
DEVELOPED IN 1870 WITH A
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
KNOWN AS THE RODGERS
HOUSE
• IN 1998, THE RODGERS WAS
RELOCATED TO THE SANTA CRUZ
COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS WHERE
IT WAS RESTORED AND
DESIGNATED A HISTORICAL
STRUCTURE
• THE PROPERTY HAS SINCE
REMAINED VACANT
632 East Lake Ave
(APN: 017-321-02)
Proposed
Zoning Map
Amendment
• Change from Neighborhood
Shopping Center (CNS) to
Thoroughfare Commercial
(CT)
WHY A ZONING MAP
AMENDMENT?
TO PERMIT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF DIFFERENT USES ON THE
PARCEL THAT:
1. REFLECT THE PARCEL’S THOROUGHFARE LOCATION
ALONG SR-152; AND
2. BETTER ALIGN WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER’S
DEVELOPMENT GOALS FOR THE PARCEL.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
• GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENTS REQUIRE
TWO FINDINGS TO BE MADE (WMC § 14-
12.708)
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FINDINGS
WMC SECTION 14-12.708
a) THAT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICIES EMBODIED IN THE GENERAL PLAN; • THE PROPOSED ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICIES EMBODIED IN THE GENERAL PLAN, INCLUDING:
• LAND USE ELEMENT GOAL 4.2: NEIGHBORHOODS
• LAND USE ELEMENT GOAL 4.7: LAND USE SUITABILITY
• LAND USE ELEMENT POLICY 4.G: LAND USE SUITABILITY
b) THAT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS COMPATIBLE TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE WITH THE ACTUAL AND GENERAL PLANNED USE OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
• THE PROPOSED ZONING MAP AMENDMENT IS COMPATIBLE TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE WITH THE ACTUAL AND GENERAL PLANNED USE OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES, BECAUSE:
• REZONING TO CT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY AT 952 EAST LAKE AVENUE; • THE SITE IS LOCATED ON A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE (EAST LAKE AVENUE/CA-152); AND • THE SITE PROVIDES CONVENIENT VEHICULAR ACCESS AND PARKING FOR THE PUBLIC.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt an ordinance approving a Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning designation from Neighborhood Shopping Center (CNS) to Thoroughfare Commercial (CT) for a 1.18± acre site located at 632 East Lake Avenue (APN: 017-321-02); and finding the Zoning Map Amendment exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15061(b)(3).
Thank you!
From: City Council
To: Eduardo Montesino; Vanessa Quiroz; Maria Orozco; Kristal Salcido; Casey Clark; Jimmy Dutra; Ari Parker; cityclerk
Subject: FW: Public Comment - City Council Meeting March 11, 2025 Date: Monday, March 10, 2025 5:04:04 PM
From: Steven Penrose <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 5:03:48 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: City Council <[email protected]>
Subject: Public Comment - City Council Meeting March 11, 2025 RE: Item No. 11.b
ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 14-41 (DRIVETHROUGH FACILITY RESTRICTIONS) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REMOVING THE 150-FT. RESIDENTIAL SETBACK
REQUIREMENT FROM THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL, NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING
CENTER, & VISITOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
and
Item No. 11.c
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT CHANGING THE ZONING MAP DESIGNATION FROM
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER TO THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL FOR A 1.18-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 632 EAST LAKE AVENUE Dear City Council Members,
I am writing on behalf of my client Tomas R. Fuentes. Mr. Fuentes is the trustee of a family trust that owns Tuttle San Carlos, LP, which in turn owns the apartment building located at 610 Tuttle Avenue in Watsonville. I understand that denial of the Quick Quack application to build and operate a car wash at 632 East Lake Ave. was recommended at the Planning Commission meeting held November 19, 2024, but that the property owner pulled his application prior to a second consideration scheduled for January 7, 2025. I understand that at its meeting tomorrow the City Council is reviewing proposals to change the zoning map designation from Neighborhood Shopping Center to Thoroughfare Commercial, and to modify Watsonville Municipal Code Chapter 14-41 regarding Drive-Through Facility Restrictions. My client objects to modifications that would change the zoning so as to eliminate the 150-foot setback requirement from residential properties in order to allow this car wash to be built and operated so close to his family’s apartment buildng.
My client agrees with the denial of this project. He opposes this use of the parcel adjoining 610 Tuttle due to the noise and traffic that it will cause, and the impact of that noise and traffic on occupants of the 610 Tuttle apartments. My client believes that his tenants will be very unhappy with the noise and traffic, that their quiet enjoyment of their apartments will be disrupted as a result, that vacancies will also result, and that the vacancies will be difficult to
fill if the car wash use is approved for 632 East Lake Ave, resulting in a substantial loss of rental income.
Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of my client’s objection.
Please notify me about the action on these applications.
Steven D. Penrose
Certified by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization as a Specialist in Estate Planning, Probate and Trust Law
Penrose Chun & Gorman LLP
1200 Pacific Avenue, Suite 260
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
tel: 831-515-3344ext. 202
fax: 831-515-3308
www.pcg-llp.com
[email protected]
The information in this e-mail (including attachments, if any) is considered confidential and is intended only for the recipient(s) listed above. Any review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited except by or on behalf of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify me (831-515-3344 ext. 202) immediately by reply email, delete this email, and do not disclose its contents to anyone. Thank you.