and Yolo County anticipates replacing the vehicles in late FY22/23. Prior to the Covid pandemic, Animal Services received support from jail inmates, but that program was stopped for safety reasons and is not expected to resume. The 2 new ACA positions will ensure sufficient staffing exists at the shelter to provide care and a safe environment for animals and staff.
Under the Sheriff’s Office budget, for FY 2022-23, City’s share of the cost is $824,011. Under this methodology, estimated fixed costs (approximately 35% of the operating budget) are shared equally by each of the four major contracting agencies (Woodland, Davis, West Sacramento and Yolo County), and a lesser allocation is assigned to the smaller contracting agencies (Winters and UC Davis). The remaining variable costs (65% of the operating budget) are then apportioned based on the “calls for service” metrics applied historically. In prior years, this methodology also credited projected animal licensing revenues back to the jurisdiction of origin to offset their allocated costs. This year, instead of including an estimated credit amount for animal licenses in the contracts, contract amounts include the actual breakdown by jurisdiction without the credit. Under this method, the Sheriff’s Office will breakdown all revenues (animal licenses, donations, fees, etc.) on a quarterly basis and subtract jurisdiction-specific revenue from the jurisdiction’s quarterly invoice. Animal licenses revenue will be based on license jurisdiction and all other fees will be based the variable breakdown. The Sheriff’s Office estimates that with projected licensing and other revenue sources, the City’s costs would be reduced by $112,073 for a total of $711,938.
Under the current model, by continuing to promote its licensing programs and generating more licensing revenues than projected, the City has the potential to further offset its allocated costs. On this basis, the City has coordinated with Animal Services in the past to provide licensing at dog-related City events and activities. Staff is continuing to look for opportunities to promote licensing as a means to partially offset the cost of the proposed contract.
This is a one-year contract which may be extended for another year upon mutual agreement of the County and City.
Environmental Considerations
N/A
Commission Recommendation
N/A
Strategic Plan Integration
Providing animal control services supports the City’s goal to provide Quality Services.
Alternatives
The City Council’s primary alternatives are summarized below:
1. Authorize the Mayor or her designee to execute the attached one-year, $824,011 agreement with the County of Yolo for animal control services for fiscal year 2022-23; and take any actions necessary in order to effectuate the provision of animal control services in West Sacramento consistent with the terms described in this report.
2. Authorize the Mayor or her designee to execute the attached agreement, subject to specific changes as directed by the Council;
3. Direct staff to bring the proposed agreement back at a future date with changes and/or additional analysis; or,
4. Decline to authorize the execution of the attached agreement and direct staff to cease work on this issue.
Alternative 1 is staff’s recommendation. Staff is prepared to effectuate Alternatives 2 or 3 at the Council’s direction. Staff does not recommend Alternative 4, because, upon termination of the existing agreement with Yolo County, it would leave residents without access to animal control services.
Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the City Manager’s Office in collaboration with the City Attorney’s Office and the Finance Department.
615
Animal Services Agreement FY 22/23
October 19, 2022
Budget/Cost Impact
The proposed cost in FY 2022-23 is $824,5011, but with the potential for approximately $112,073 in savings, the total cost is expected to be around $711,938. The cost for Animal Services is a General Fund expenditure and Council approved an appropriation of $758,102 for Animal Services in a budget adjustment included with the mid-term budget. Though not anticipated, there is budget contingency in the General Fund in the event the costs exceed the appropriation.
ATTACHMENT
Agreement for Animal Control Services for 2022-23.
616
Attachment 1
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: October 19, 2022 ITEM # 17
SUBJECT:
CONSIDERATION OF PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING
SEPTEMBER 15 TO OCTOBER 15, 2022 AS HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[X] Council [ ] Staff
[ ] Other
Paul Hosley, Public Information Officer
City Manager’s Office
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to formally recognize the culture and contributions of Hispanic community members to the City of West Sacramento.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt a proclamation recognizing September 15 to October 15, 2022 as Hispanic Heritage Month.
BACKGROUND
Each year, Americans observe National Hispanic Heritage Month from September 15 to October 15, by celebrating the histories, cultures, and contributions of American citizens whose ancestors came from Spain, Mexico, the Caribbean and Central and South America. The date September 15 is significant because it is the anniversary of independence for the Latin American countries of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua. Additionally, Mexico and Chile celebrate their independence days on September 16 and September 18, respectively.
The observation started in 1968 as Hispanic Heritage Week under President Lyndon Johnson and was expanded by President Ronald Reagan in 1988 to cover a 30-day period starting on September 15 and ending on October
15. It was enacted into law on August 17, 1988, on the approval of Public Law 100-402.
According to the 2020 Census, the Hispanic population of the United States is 62.1 million, constituting 18.7% of the total population. In California there are 15.5 million Hispanic residents or 39.4% of the state’s population.
In Yolo County 69 thousand identify as Hispanic, or 31.7%. Those that identify as Hispanic in our community include restaurant and business owners, contractors, engineers, doctors, lawyers, teachers, students, childcare providers, City staff and politicians, among other occupations.
ANALYSIS
The Hispanic population continues its rich tradition of significant and diverse contributions to the cultural, educational, economic, social and political vitality of our community. Four out of five West Sacramento City Council members are of Hispanic background. The 2020 Census shows 17.5 thousand West Sacramento residents are of Hispanic origin, or 32.6% of the population.
Adoption of this proclamation recognizing Hispanic Heritage Month will signify the City’s appreciation for our Hispanic and Spanish speaking population and serve to honor this segment of our community.
Environmental Considerations
N/A
Commission Recommendation
N/A
Strategic Plan Integration
Adoption of this proclamation supports and recognizes the City’s diversity and equitable investment strategy goals.
Alternatives
N/A
627
Proclamation to recognize Hispanic Heritage Month
October 19, 2022
Coordination and Review
N/A
Budget/Cost Impact
N/A
ATTACHMENT
Proclamation
628
Proclamation of the City Council of the City of West Sacramento Recognizing Hispanic Heritage Month WHEREAS, National Hispanic Heritage Month, established in 1988, is an opportunity to celebrate the rich cultural traditions and honor the significant achievements of our Hispanic and Latino residents whose ancestors came from Spain, Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America, and South America; and WHEREAS, Hispanic and Latino Americans have made enormous contributions to our diverse society by sharing their talents, culture, traditions, and their deep connection to family values and a commitment to faith and a desire to live the American dream; and
WHEREAS, according to the 2020 Census, more than 32% of West Sacramento residents identify as Hispanic or Latina/Latino; and
WHEREAS, four out of five City Councilmembers are of Hispanic or Latina/Latino descent; and WHEREAS, West Sacramento has many Hispanic owned businesses that contribute to and shape the community in which we live; and
WHEREAS, we recognize and honor the many ways that the Hispanic and Latino populations have enriched the fabric of our society while also rededicating ourselves to address the lack of equal access to opportunity that many still face; and
WHEREAS, the City of West Sacramento is proud to honor the history and contributions of the Hispanic and Latino population in our community and throughout our state and our Nation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of West Sacramento does hereby recognize September 15 to October 15, 2022 as “Hispanic Heritage Month.” PROCLAIMED THIS 19th day of October 2022
ATTEST:
______________________________________ ___________________________________ Martha Guerrero, Mayor Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
629
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: October 19, 2022 ITEM # 18
SUBJECT:
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE JULY 20, 2022, AUGUST 3, 2022, AUGUST 17, 2022, AND SEPTEMBER 21 REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE WEST
SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AND WEST
SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
City Manager’s Office
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with the draft minutes of the July 20, 2022, August 3, 2022, August 17, 2022, and September 21, 2022 Regular Meetings of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve the minutes of the July 20, 2022, August 3, 2022, August 17, 2022, and September 21, 2022 Regular Meetings of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority.
BACKGROUND
N/A
ANALYSIS
N/A
Environmental Considerations
N/A
Commission Recommendations
N/A
Strategic Plan Integration
N/A
Coordination and Review
N/A
Budget Cost Impact
N/A
ATTACHMENT(S)
1) Draft Minutes of the July 20, 2022, Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority 2) Draft Minutes of the August 3, 2022, Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority 3) Draft Minutes of the August 17, 2022, Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority 630
Approval of Minutes
October 19, 2022
4) Draft Minutes of the September 21, 2022, Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority 631
Attachment 1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL,
REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AND WEST
SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
JULY 20, 2022
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM. Councilmember Ledesma was absent. All other Councilmembers were present. Mayor Guerrero presided.
The Land Acknowledgement was recited by Mayor Guerrero.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Rhonda Morningstar Pope, Chair of the Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians.
Entry No. 1
The presentation by Yolo County on the Healthy Yolo Together Program will be rescheduled.
Received a presentation by the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito & Vector Control District on current issues and challenges related to mosquito control.
Entry No. 2
Heard General Administration Functions, Part I as follows:
Heard presentations by the public on matters not on the agenda.
Entry No. 3
Minute Order 22-48: Acted on the Consent Agenda as follows:
Found that the Sybertech Trash System Installation Project is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to a Class 1 (Existing Facility) Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and find that the Exemption reflects the independent judgment of the City as lead agency under CEQA, awarded a Construction Contract to Electric Tech Construction, Inc. for the Sybertech Trash Systems Installation Project for a total base bid price of $92,664, authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with Electric Tech Construction, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $92,664, and authorized e the City Manager, or his designee, the authority to issue contract change orders up to 10% of the contract amount, not to exceed $9,266.40.
Found that the Homekey Program Electrical Improvements Project is exempt from review under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15301(d) (Existing Facilities) and find that the determination represents the independent judgment of the City, adopted Resolution 22-94 approving an amendment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to amend the Homekey Electrical Improvement Project (CIP 51035), awarded a contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Lords Electric, Inc., for the construction of the Homekey Program Electrical Improvements Project for a total bid price of $315,000, authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute a contract with Lords Electric Inc. in the amount of $315,000, granted the City Manager, or his designee, authority to issue monthly progress payments to the contractor, and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendments up to 15% ($47,250) of the value of the contract.
Adopted Resolution 22-98 approving an amendment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to add the Westacre Expansion and Renovation Project, awarded a professional services contract to Melton Design Group, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $489,902, authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with Melton Design Group, Inc. in the amount of $489,902, authorized e the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the contract with Melton Design Group, Inc. with approval from the City Attorney, and authorized e the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendments up to 15% ($73,485) of the value of the contract. 632
2 Approved and authorized the City Manager, or the City Manager’s designee, to execute all contract(s) and purchase order(s) with Rexel Energy Solutions, (ChargePoint’s third party supplier), and ChargePoint, Inc. related to the purchase of electric vehicle supply equipment. This shall include site validation for installation, a 5-year software subscription, and 5 years of maintenance support and warranty support through Assure, under the Plug-In Partnership Grant, authorized e the City Manager, or the City Manager’s designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the purchase orders or contracts with Rexel Energy Solutions or ChargePoint, with approval from the City Attorney, authorized the City Manager, or the City Manager’s designee, to issue change orders up to 10% of the value of the purchase order, not to exceed $125,000, and authorized the City Manager, or the City Manager’s designee, to approve and execute a Master Services and Subscription Agreement for Cloud Services with ChargePoint, Inc.
Adopted Resolution 22-103 approving Parcel Map 5210 located within the Southport Business Park and bounded by Ramos Drive, Oates Street, and Massie Court.
Approved and authorized the City Manager to execute a contract with Downtown Streets, Inc. for one year with the option to extend for two additional one-year terms in an amount not to exceed $1,083,649 for three years, and approve minor amendments to the Scope of Services or Budget line items that do not materially impact the services of the program or increase the overall program budget, adopted Resolution 22-73 authorizing the City Manager to execute a subrecipient agreement with Yolo County for revenue in the amount of $450,000, and adopted Resolution 22-74 approving an increase of $50,622 to the budget appropriation for the FY 2022/23 Downtown Streets Contract in the Measure E fund to be offset by $150,000 funded by the Yolo County American Rescue Plan Funds (ARP).
Approved Resolution 22-100 approving the conversion of the interest rate on the West Sacramento Financing Authority’s 2020 Water Revenue Refunding Bond (federally taxable convertible) to the taxexempt rate and authorized the Officers of the Authority to implement the conversion and to do all things to execute and deliver the documents in order to complete the conversion.
Accepted the Annual Report, Single Audit, and Appropriations Limit Report for fiscal year ending June 30, 2021.
Found that the adoption of Ordinance 22-18, which would amend Chapter 12.08 of the City of West Sacramento Municipal Code to allow for regulation of Special Events within the City limits, is not a project that is subject to CEQA because it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21065; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15060(c), 15378(a)), waived the second reading and read by title only and adopted Ordinance 22-18, amending Chapter 12.08 of the City of West Sacramento Municipal Code related to Special Events within the city limits of the City of West Sacramento.
Adopted Resolution 22-105 accepting $2.37 million in grant funding from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy and amending CIP 62131 (Bees Lakes Habitat Restoration Plan and Public Access Improvements Project) to include the additional grant funding and scope of work, approved a Grant Agreement with the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy to receive $2.37 million in grant funding for the Project, and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the Grant Agreement in substantially the form attached with approval from the City Attorney.
Adopted Resolution 22-101 approving a budget appropriation of $270,000 from the General Support Services Fund (Fund 104) for the emergency rental with Sunbelt Rentals for the Civic Center Emergency HVAC repair.
Received information regarding the emergency contract with Tap Master, Inc. for the Longcroft Street Emergency water main repair.
Found that the purchase of water treatment chemicals is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under the General Rule exemption provided for in the CEQA Guidelines Section § 15061(b)(3), authorized staff to purchase water treatment chemicals as a bid through North Bay Agency Chemical Pool (NBACP), authorized staff to sole source and purchase water treatment chemicals not 633
3 covered by the NBACP, and adopted Resolution 22-102 for $67,000 from the Water Fund (Fund 506) to cover unanticipated cost increases for raw materials required to produce required chemicals.
MOTION: Early SECOND: Alcala.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Alcala, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Ledesma
Minute Order 22-49: Adopted Resolution 22-104 accepting the public improvements required of Subdivision 5099, “The Rivers - Phase II”.
MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Early.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Ledesma
RECUSED: Alcala
Entry No. 4
Minute Order 22-50: Conducted a Public Hearing and adopted Resolution 22-99 certifying inclusion of delinquent charges and penalties for water, sewer and refuse services on the secured tax roll in the same manner as the general taxes and directing that a lien also be placed on the subject properties.
MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Orozco.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Alcala, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Ledesma
Minute Order 22-51: Conducted a Public Hearing regarding placing the levy for the Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1 on the 2022-23 tax roll, approved the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1 Report for 2022-2023 with budget and fee schedule, and adopted the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1 Report for 2022-2023 with budget and fee schedule, and adopted Resolution 22-88 confirming diagram and assessment, and ordering improvements (maintenance) to be made for the Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1.
MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Early.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Alcala, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Ledesma
Minute Order 22-52: conducted a Public Hearing regarding placement of the levy for the Storm Drain Maintenance District No. 1 on the 2022-2023 tax roll, approved the Storm Drain District No. 1 Report for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 with budget and fee schedule, and adopted Resolution 22-89 confirming the diagram and assessment and ordering improvements (maintenance) to be made for the Storm Drain Maintenance District No. 1.
MOTION: Early SECOND: Alcala.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Alcala, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Ledesma
Minute Order 22-53: Conducted a Public Hearing to receive public comment on the charges for mandatory weed abatement services initiated by the City and adopted Resolution 22-20 certifying the list of weed abatement charges, directing that a lien be placed on the subject properties and requesting inclusion of these charges on the secured tax roll in order that they may be collected in the same 634
4 manner as general taxes and directing the Yolo County Auditor to add the expenses to the individual tax rolls.
MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Orozco.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Alcala, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Ledesma
Minute Order 22-54: Conducted a Public Hearing on updating the Book of Fees for City Preschools, adopted Resolution 22-79 updating the Book of Fees related to City Preschools, and authorized the City Manager or designee, to adjust fees annually, not to exceed twenty percent (20%) of the current fees.
MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Early.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Alcala, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Ledesma
Entry No. 5
Minute Order 22-55: Reviewed staff’s report and attachments on the proposed mid-term amendments to the O&M and CIP budgets for FY 2022/23, provide feedback and direction on the proposed amendments, and take the following additional actions, adopted Resolution 22-64 approving the spending plan and related appropriations for American Rescue Plan (ARP) funds, adopted Resolution 22-106 directing staff to maintain 100% of revenues in the Measure G Fund, retroactively to July 1, 2021, to allow the use of those revenues for eligible capital projects as approved by the City Council until such time the EIFD budget policy is adopted, delegated authority to the Finance Director to transfer General Fund surplus and remaining undesignated fund balance to the One-Time General Fund for use on one-time projects at the end of each fiscal year, and adopted Resolution 22-97 approving mid-term amendments to the Operations & Maintenance and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budgets for FY 2022/23.
MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Alcala.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Alcala, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Ledesma
Entry No. 6
Heard General Administration Function, Part II.
Mayor Pro Tem Orozco reported on July 7, 2022, meeting of the Executive Commission for the Homeless and the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District Board meeting.
Mayor Guerrero reported on the July 20, 2022 meeting of the Sacramento Area Council of Government Bike Sharing Policy Steering Committee.
Minute Order 22-56: Adjourned the meeting at 9:50 PM.
MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Early
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Alcala, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Ledesma
635
5 Public Report of Closed Session
Conference with Labor Negotiator - GC §54957.6
Negotiating Parties: Kevin Flautt
Employee Organizations: Local 39
Conference with Legal Counsel – GC §54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case: Arrowood Indemnity Company v. City of West Sacramento Conference with Real Property Negotiator - GC §54956.8
Negotiating Parties: Estes Terminals of CA, LLC (also known as Estes Trucking) Property: 4200 West Capitol Avenue, West Sacramento, CA; APN 008-020-002 Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation – GC §54956.9(d)(1) Name of Case: Latino Information and Resource Network, Maria Grijalva, Broderick Area Homeowners’ Association, Neighborhood Elections Now v. City of West Sacramento, Case No. CV2021-1886 No action taken.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on October 19, 2022.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
636
Attachment 2
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL,
REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AND WEST
SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUGUST 3, 2022
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM. Councilmember Early was absent and all other Councilmembers were present. Mayor Guerrero presided.
The Land Acknowledgement was recited by Mayor Guerrero.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by the Garcia Family.
Entry No. 1
Heard General Administration Functions, Part I as follows:
Heard presentations by the public on matters not on the agenda.
Entry No. 2
Minute Order 22-57: Acted on the Consent Agenda as follows:
Approved Amendment No. 1 to the emergency contract with Teichert Construction in the amount of $33,961.57 for the Coke Street Emergency Sink Hole Repair (CIP 31007) and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 1 with Teichert Construction.
Awarded a professional services contract with Quincy Engineering, Inc. for construction management services for the Sycamore Trail Extension Phase II Project, approved and delegated e authority to the City Manager or his designee to execute a professional services contract with Quincy Engineering, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $1,334,573.06, authorized the City Manager to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the Contract for Professional Services, with approval from the City Attorney, and authorized the City Manager or his designee to make contract amendments up to 15% ($200,186.00) of the value of the contract.
Authorized the City Manager or his designee to approve and execute a contract with HiTouch Business Services (through the Sourcewell contract) in an amount not to exceed $121,925.88 and authorized the City Manager or his designee to make contract amendments up to 10% ($12,192.59) of the value of the contract.
Approved the proposed Capital Asset Policy, which shall replace and supersede Administrative Policy IV-C-4: Disposition of City Property.
Adopted Resolution 22-108 establishing an appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2022/23.
MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Alcala.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Alcala, Ledesma, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Early
Entry No. 3
Minute Order 22-58: Conducted a Public Hearing and adopted Resolution 22-39 adopting the 2022- 2023 Annual Action Plan for the use of federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding.
MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Ledesma
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Alcala, Ledesma, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Early
637
2 Entry No. 4
Heard General Administration Function, Part II.
Councilmember Alcala reported on the Yolo Local Agency Formation Commission meeting.
Councilmember Ledesma reported on the August 3, 2022 Port Commission meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Orozco reported on July 7, 2022, meeting of the Executive Commission for the Homeless and the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District Board meeting.
Mayor Guerrero reported on the July 20, 2022 meeting of the Sacramento Area Council of Government Bike Sharing Policy Steering Committee.
Minute Order 22-59: Adjourned the meeting at 7:46 PM.
MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Ledesma
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Alcala, Ledesma, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Early
Public Report of Closed Session
Conference with Labor Negotiator - GC §54957.6
Negotiating Parties: Kevin Flautt
Employee Organizations: Local 39
No action taken.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on October 19, 2022.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
638
Attachment 3
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL,
REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AND WEST
SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
AUGUST 17, 2022
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM. All Councilmembers were present. Mayor Guerrero presided.
The Land Acknowledgement was recited by Mayor Guerrero.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by the West Sacramento Little League 2022 12u and 10u All-Star Teams.
Entry No, 1
Presented a Proclamation recognizing the achievements of the West Sacramento Little League 2022 12u and 10u All-Star Teams.
Entry No. 2
Minute Order 22-60: Acted on the Consent Agenda as follows:
Adopted Resolution 22-92 amending the Capital Improvement Program, awarded a professional services contract with Black & Veatch for engineering services for the City of West Sacramento Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Update (CIP 31008), delegated authority to the City Manager or his designee to execute the contract for services with Black & Veatch for a total not-to-exceed $499,836, and authorized the City Manager to make contract amendments up to 15% ($74,975) of the value of the contract.
Approved contract Amendment No. 1 to the contract for professional services with Lee & Ro, Inc.
Engineering Services for assessment and support services for the Sludge Collector Replacement Project (CIP 21036) at the Water Treatment Plant in the amount of $31,161 and authorized the City Manager, or contract designee to execute the contract amendment.
Adopted Resolution 22-91 amending the Capital Improvement Program, awarding a contract for professional services with Zanjero Inc. for engineering services for the City of West Sacramento Water Master Plan Update (CIP 21037), delegated authority to the City Manager or his designee to execute the contract for services not-to-exceed $499,768, and authorized the City Manager to make contract amendments up to 15% ($74,965) of the value of the contract.
Approved a six-month time extension of the existing contract between the City of West Sacramento and AECOM Technical Services for Climate Action Plan services from September 13, 2022, through March 13, 2023 and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute a contract amendment effectuating the above-referenced extension, and to take any actions necessary to effectuate the amendment described in this report.
Found that the Homekey Program Facility emergency roof repair project is exempt from review under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15301 (d) (Existing Facilities) and § 15269 (emergency repairs to publicly or privately owned service facilities necessary to maintain service essential to the public health, safety or welfare), adopted Resolution 22-110, by a minimum four-fifths vote, amending the Capital Improvement Program and approving continuance of the Emergency Contract with Madsen Roofing & Waterproofing and funding for the emergency roof repairs at 817 West Capitol Avenue, and authorized the City Manager to execute change orders for up to 20% ($15,013) of the contract value.
Adopted Resolution 22-84 approving an infill adjustment to the residential and commercial development impact fees in the Washington and Central Business Districts for three years with the option to extend the pilot program for two additional years with City Manager approval and delegating certain authorities to implement the reforms to the City Manager and Finance Director and directed staff to commence negotiations with Yolo County, Washington Unified School District and Sacramento Regional Sanitation 639
2 District to achieve a similar reduction of those development impact fees in infill areas described in Resolution 22-84.
Received and filed the Treasurer’s Quarterly Financial Report on the City’s investment portfolio for the period ending June 30, 2022.
Authorized the City Manager or designee, to execute a contract with HDR Engineering, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $936,229, for the Bees Lakes Habitat Restoration Plan and Public Access Improvements Project (CIP 62131), in substantially the form attached with approval from the City Attorney.
Approved the modified job classification description for Police Records Technician I/II and the new job classification description for Police Records Technician Senior, approved the modified job classification description for Crime Analyst I/II and the new job classification description for Crime Analyst Senior, approved the modified job classification description for Community Services Officer I/II and the new job classification description for Community Services Officer Senior, and approved the amended and updated Authorized Position List (APL) for Fiscal Year 2022/23.
Reviewed and authorized the response to the Yolo County Grand Jury report titled “Inspecting the Inspectors: Hiring Practices at City of West Sacramento, Building Division.” Adopted Resolution 22-113 declaring the City of West Sacramento a defender of reproductive freedom.
MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Early.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Alcala, Ledesma, Orozco, Guerrero.
Entry No. 3
Minute Order 22-61: Approved a professional services contract with Dewberry in the amount of $378,850.25 for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the North Riverwalk Trail Extension Project (CIP 62111), authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a professional services contract with Dewberry for an amount not to exceed $378,850.25, authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendments with Dewberry up to 15% ($56,828) of the total contract value, approved the Project Plans and Specifications, awarded a construction contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, B & M Builders, Inc. in the amount of $2,175,280, delegated authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction contract with B & M Builders, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $2,175,280, authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute changes or modifications to the construction contract with B & M Builders, Inc., with approval from the City Attorney, authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments, miscellaneous construction costs, or change orders up to 15% ($326,292) of the total contract value for the construction contract with B & M Builders, Inc., authorized the City Manager, or his designee to execute a change order in the amount of $27,076 to purchase additional electrical materials from AZCO Supply, authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute change orders to purchase electrical materials from AZCO Supply for up to 15% ($28,375) of the total value.
MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Ledesma
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Alcala, Ledesma, Orozco.
NO: Guerrero
Entry No. 4
Heard General Administration Function, Part II.
Councilmember Ledesma reported on the August 4, 2022 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Transportation Committee meeting.
Councilmember Early reported on the Yolo County Housing Authority meeting 640
3 Minute Order 22-62: Adjourned the meeting at 8:50 PM.
MOTION: Ledesma SECOND: Early
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Alcala, Ledesma, Orozco, Guerrero.
Public Report of Closed Session
Conference with Labor Negotiator - GC §54957.6
Negotiating Parties: Kevin Flautt
Employee Organizations: Local 39
No action taken.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on October 19, 2022.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
641
Attachment 4
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL,
REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AND WEST
SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
SEPTEMBER 21, 2022
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM. Councilmember Ledesma was absent, and all other Councilmembers were present. Mayor Guerrero presided.
The Land Acknowledgement was recited by Mayor Guerrero.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chung Park.
Entry No. 1
Minute Order 22-63: Acted on the Consent Agenda as follows:
Awarded the contract for professional services to SVA Architects, Inc. in the amount of $142,350, authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with SVA Architects, Inc. in the amount of $142,350, and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to make contract amendments up to 15% ($21,352.50) of the value of the contract.
Adopted Resolution 22-114 amending the Capital Improvement Program (CIP 15029 and CIP 21025) and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 3 to the Construction Management Services Contract with Unico Engineering extending the contract completion date to January 31, 2023, and additional compensation of $220,000 for the West Capitol Avenue Safety Enhancement and Road Rehabilitation Project (CIP 15029 and CIP 21025).
Found that the landscape maintenance services identified in the Contract for Services with Dominguez Landscape Services, Inc. are exempt from CEQA pursuant to the Categorical Exemption under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Section 15301 and find that the determination represents the independent judgment of the City, authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with Dominguez Landscape Services, Inc. for landscape maintenance services in an amount not to exceed $2,908,204.88, authorized the City Manager to execute nonsubstantive changes or modifications to the Contract for Services, with approval from the City Attorney, and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, the authority to issue contract change orders in an amount not to exceed $75,273.
Approved and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute the Second Amended and Restated Concessionaire Agreement with Kletterwald Heritage Oaks Park, LLC for use of a portion of the Heritage Oaks Park property, in substantially the form attached to this report, with such changes, insertions, revisions, corrections, or amendments as shall be approved by the City Attorney.
Found that the Rip Rap Walls emergency project is exempt from review under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15301 (d) (Existing Facilities) and § 15269 (emergency repairs to publicly or privately owned service facilities necessary to maintain service essential to the public health, safety or welfare), adopted Resolution 22-117, by a minimum four-fifths vote, approving continuance of the Emergency Contract with Ford Construction Company, Inc. and amending the Capital Improvement Program to add a new project number (CIP 62156) and approve the transfer of funding from CIP 62146 to the Project for construction of improvements to increase lakes levels at Bridgeway Lakes, and authorized the City Manager or designee to execute change orders not to exceed 10% ($11,787) of the Contract value.
Found that the maintenance and repair services identified in the contract with California Custom Docks Corporation are exempt from CEQA pursuant to the Categorical Exemption under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Sections 15301 and find that the determination represents the independent judgment of the City, authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a Contract for Services with California Custom Docks Corporation for maintenance and repair services in an amount not to exceed $177,732.00, and authorized the City Manager to execute 642
2 non-substantive changes or modifications to the Contract for Services, with approval from the City Attorney.
Approved the modification to the job classification description: Finance Manager, approved the modification to the job classification description: Senior Project Manager, approved the modification to the job classification description: Senior Analyst, and approved the Y-rated publicly available pay schedule (Classification Plan) for Fiscal Year 2022/23.
Approved the terms of the successor agreement and adopt the successor Memorandum of Understanding between the City of West Sacramento and the West Sacramento Stationary Engineer's, Local 39 effective July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024, approved the amended and updated Authorized Position List (APL) for Fiscal Year 2022/23, approved the amended job classification description for Water Treatment Plant Operator II/III, approved the amended job classification description for Senior Water Treatment Plant Operator, approved the updated Classification Plan (Salary Schedule) and Benefits Summaries for West Sacramento Stationary Engineer's, Local 39, and adopted Resolution 22-120 approving amendments to the approved biennial budget for Fiscal Year 2022/23 to fund the proposed salary and benefit changes.
Approved and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute the proposed contract with Valley Vision to prepare an update to the City’s Broadband Action Plan and to provide related consulting services in substantially the form, authorized the City Manager or his designee to take any actions he deems necessary to effectuate that contract, including without limitation making non-substantive edits to the contract or attachments following their approval by the Council, and adopted Resolution 22-121 authorizing a budget appropriation of $85,000 from Measure E to fund the proposed contract.
MOTION: Early SECOND: Orozco
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Alcala, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Ledesma
Entry No. 2
Heard General Administration Function, Part II.
Mayor Pro Tem Orozco reported on the August 24, 2022 and September 14, 2022 meetings of the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District Board and the September 1, 2022 Yolo County Executive Commission to Address Homelessness meeting.
Councilmember Alcala reported on the League of California Cities conference.
Councilmember Early reported on the Yolo Subbasin Sustainable Groundwater Agency meeting and the Yolo Habitat Conservancy meeting.
Mayor Guerrero reported on the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Board meeting, the SACOG Transportation Committee meeting, and the League of California Cities conference.
Minute Order 22-64: Appointed Dawn Pedersen to the Arts, Culture, & Historic Preservation Commission.
MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Early
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Alcala, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Ledesma
Minute Order 22-65: Adjourned the meeting at 8:20 PM.
MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Early
643
3 ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Early, Alcala, Orozco, Guerrero.
ABSENT: Ledesma
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on October 19, 2022.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
644
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: October 19, 2022 ITEM # 19
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 22-19
REGARDING FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ALURA AT WASHINGTON SQUARE (FOUR 40 WEST) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH BLACKPINE 440 WEST, LLC INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Amber Saiyasit, Program Manager
Economic Development and Housing
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this item is to facilitate the Council’s consideration of an amendment to an existing Development Agreement (DA) between Blackpine 440 West, LLC and the City of West Sacramento (City) for a future project located at 412-420 & 425 6th Street in the Washington District (see Attachment 1, Location Map) and provide the Council with information necessary to consider and approve Ordinance 22-19.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the Council:
1. Conduct the public hearing; and
2. Find that the First Amendment to the Development Agreement with Blackpine 440 West LLC (Attachment 3) at 412-420 & 425 6th Street is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis under the Class 32 (Infill Development Projects) Categorical Exemption, under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15332 and finds that the Exemption reflects the independent judgment of the City as lead agency under CEQA; and
3. Waive first reading and read by title and number only, Ordinance 22-19 (Attachment 2) approving the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement with Blackpine 440 West LLC (Attachment 3) at 412-420 & 425 6th Street; and
4. Inform the Audience that the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 22-19 is tentatively scheduled for November 2, 2022.
BACKGROUND
The Washington District of West Sacramento (the “District”) is a priority area for compact, transit-served, mixeduse growth due to its existing mix of uses, riverfront location, historic architecture, large office buildings and connected and walkable street grid pattern. The District is an urban area bounded by Tower Bridge Gateway on the south, the Sacramento River on the east, A Street on the north, and portions of Sixth and Eighth Street on the west. In 2011, despite its proximity to economic generators, the neighborhood was lacking in contemporary economic vitality due to numerous vacant and underutilized properties, infrastructure deficiencies, substandard housing, brownfields, and security concerns.
In 2015, Council approved a Sustainable Community Strategy (“Washington Realized”) which identified strategies and improvements to address these challenges. The recommendations were shaped by two years of community engagement and extensive technical studies and analyses, which included housing. The housing chapter identified approximately 1,360 dwelling units in the Washington study area, of which 275 (20%) are restricted to affordability for lower income households compared to 9% affordable units citywide in 2015. Another 297 affordable units are located within a one-half mile radius, close enough to take advantage of jobs and transit resulting from infill development. Much of the existing housing stock in the District is aging and substandard and 645
Ordinance 22-19
October 19, 2022
the percentage of owner-occupied residential units remains very low. Of the total housing, 54% of the housing was built before 1970 as compared to 39% citywide.
Since 2015, the City has completed many of the recommended improvements identified in Washington Realized, investing over $15 million dollars in one of the oldest neighborhoods in the City. These projects have secured state and federal assistance grants matched by local funds. As the character of the District has evolved, several new restaurants and small businesses have been attracted to the District and the City has begun implementing urban parking. A new Washington Specific Plan based on Washington Realized and other updates to policies and recommendations is underway.
While there is significant interest from investors and developers in new residential development in the Washington District, real estate development is highly cost sensitive, and the City competes with downtown and midtown Sacramento for development activity. Downtown and midtown Sacramento have significantly lower fees and slightly higher rents. New residential development in Washington has been occurring at a slower pace than in the Bridge District, which has implemented urban fee methods. Currently, West Sacramento fees are largely governed by suburban financing approaches which tend to overburden urban development. Most urban development in Washington has been government driven (e.g., CalSTRS) or due to an existing vesting status.
In 2006, the Planning Commission approved a Tentative Subdivision Map (TM) for the Four 40 West project, known at the time as the Alura project, located on a 1.05-acre site at 412, 416, & 420 6th Street in Washington.
Since the approval of the original map, the project has received multiple approvals for map modifications and extensions (see Attachment 4 for entitlement history). Currently, the project has two associated TMs, TM 4936 and TM 5211, combined creating a 7.4-acre project of 106 single-family residential units and a neighborhood park.
On October 14, 2020, the Council approved a DA with Blackpine, LLC to provide the project a one-year time extension for TM 4936 with an option to extend for an additional year, as TM 4936 was set to expire November 15, 2020. The extension was to allow the developer time to incorporate TM 5211 into the project’s DA through a Restated and Amended DA, which would add a neighborhood park and additional developable area into the project’s vested entitlements. On October 20, 2021, the authorized parties of the DA executed the option to extend the DA for an additional year, setting the expiration of the DA to November 13, 2022. Upon expiration, the vested entitlements protected under TM 4936 will also expire.
ANALYSIS
Over the course of the last two years, development and construction of the project have been delayed for a variety of reasons, including disruptions to work schedules and supply chain interruptions caused by the COVID19 pandemic. However, the developer has made diligent efforts to advance the development and construction of the project. The developer's efforts have included working with City staff to complete the Restated and Amended DA’s provisions to adjust the project to the mutual benefit of all parties, pulling conditional building permits to initiate construction on three model homes for the project, as well as completing most of the conditions of approval for the project’s final map approval. Despite these efforts, both the developer and the City require additional time to finalize the project’s map and prepare and propose to Council for adoption the Restated and Amended DA. To provide additional time to finalize the efforts completed over the last two years, staff is recommending an amendment to the DA to extend the term for an additional six months, protecting the vesting provided by TM 4936 while completing the project’s final map and Restated and Amended DA.
The existing DA with Blackpine, LLC extends the project’s original map term, extends the map’s vested fees and entitlements, and provides additional relief from City Facility Impact Fees. The project will advance the City’s TOD and mixed-use development goals in the District by providing for-sale, quality residential product that appeals to employees of the large offices (CALSTRS, Department of General Services, Capitol Mall) and small businesses in the District. The new I Street Bridge is expected to also create connectivity with new jobs centers in the Railyards. Realizing high-quality residential development in this location, adjacent to industrial uses that the City intends to transition to residential, advances land use goals and brings new vitality and desirability to the western portion of the District. When the final map is approved, the project will extend the new E Street frontage improvements to 8th Street, enhancing safety and walkability for the neighborhood, and add a neighborhood park. The park design is consistent with Council-adopted policies, the approved Washington Specific Plan, the 2019 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan, and was approved by the Parks Department. These improvements were identified, envisioned, and prioritized by the community during the development of Washington Realized.
646
Ordinance 22-19
October 19, 2022
The proposed DA Amendment will extend the existing DA’s term for an additional six months, setting the new expiration date to May 13, 2023. If approved, the extension will provide the developer and staff with time to complete the project’s final map and prepare and propose for adoption a Restated and Amended DA. On October 6, 2022, the Planning Commission made the required findings (see Attachment 5, Findings and Analysis) to recommend approval of the proposed DA Amendment to the City Council. After completing their analysis, staff believe that all the required findings have been met.
Environmental Considerations
Staff has determined that a Class 32 (In-Fill Development Projects) Categorical Exemption (pursuant to section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines) is the appropriate level of review under CEQA for this document (See Attachment 6, Notice of Exemption). Class 32 consists of projects characterized as in-fill development that are consistent with the General Plan and occur within the city limits on a project site of no more than five acres and which contain no valuable habitat.
Commission Recommendation
On October 6, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed DA Amendment with Blackpine 440 West, LLC and consideration of Resolution 22-2PC (Attachment 7) recommending the City Council approve Ordinance 22-19 regarding the proposed DA Amendment with Blackpine 440 West, LLC relating to a future housing development project at 412-420 and 425 6th Street. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve Resolution 22-2PC with an additional recommendation to provide an additional sixmonth extension option, at the City Manager’s discretion.
Strategic Plan Integration
The recommended item supports the Council’s 2019 Strategic Plan Goal of, “West Sacramento: Preferred place to live, work, learn, and play” and an “Alive riverfront and downtown” by providing a diverse range of housing choices within the Washington District. The recommended action also furthers the goals of the Council’s 2019 Strategic Plan Policy Agenda item “Riverfront Development tools”, the Council’s 2020 Policy Agenda items, “Housing Production Strategy” and “Mobility & Connectivity,” and the Council’s 2022 Management Agenda item, “Waterfront Districts Public Safety & Security”. These goals are furthered by creating a transit-oriented development, or mixed-use development pattern, (i.e., placing employment, homes, amenities and services close together to reduce driving and conserve land and water resources) in the Washington neighborhood while supporting infill development on vacant and underutilized properties.
Alternatives
The Council’s primary alternatives to the recommended action include:
1. Conduct the public hearing and vote not to approve Ordinance 22-19. Staff does not recommend this alternative as not approving the proposed DA Amendment will result in the project losing all vested entitlements protected under the DA, which is currently set to expire on November 13, 2022.
2. Conduct the public hearing and find that the Class 32 Categorical Exemption is not the appropriate level of environmental review and decline to approve Ordinance 22-19. While staff believe the analysis presented in this report is correct, staff is prepared to effectuate this alternative at the Council’s direction.
Coordination and Review
This report was written and reviewed in coordination with the Economic Development and Housing Department, Planning Division, Community Development Engineering Division, and the City Attorney’s office.
Budget/Cost Impact
This action has no budget implications as the DA Amendment only provides an extension to the term of the DA.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Location Map
2. Ordinance 22-19
3. Proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement
4. Project Entitlement History
5. Findings and Analysis
6. Notice of Exemption
647
Ordinance 22-19
October 19, 2022
7. Resolution 22-2PC
648
Attachment 1
Location Map
412-420 & 425 6th Street
412-420 & 425 6th Street
NORTH
649
Attachment 2
ORDINANCE 22-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO APPROVING
THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND BLACKPINE 440 WEST, LLC PERTAINING TO
DEVELOPMENT OF THE ALURA (FOUR 40 WEST) RESIDENTIAL PROJECT WHEREAS, on October 6, 2022, the City of West Sacramento Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and adopted Resolution 22-2PC, recommending that the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Development Agreement.
The City Council of the City of West Sacramento does ordain as follows:
Section 1. Purpose and Authority. The purpose of this Ordinance is to approve the First Amendment to the Development Agreement between the City of West Sacramento and BlackPine 440 West, LLC. This Ordinance is authorized pursuant to Government Code Section 65864 through 65869.5 and Resolution No. 88-111 of the City of West Sacramento.
Section 2 Findings. In adopting this Ordinance, the City Council makes the following findings:
(a) The proposed First Amendment of the Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and the Washington Specific Plan.; and
(b) That the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement is consistent with the provisions of Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5.
Section 3. Severability. If any provision or section of this Ordinance is determined to be unenforceable, invalid, or unlawful, such determination shall not affect the enforceability of the remaining provisions of the Ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date and Publication. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption, and pursuant to Resolution 99-46, shall be published in summary format prior to adoption and a summary shall be published within fifteen (15) days after adoption in a paper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of West Sacramento.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento this 2nd day of November, 2022 by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: ___________________________ Martha Guerrero, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________ ___________________________ Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney CODIFY __ UNCODIFY___X____ 650
Attachment 3
2243260.1 7203-012
Recording Requested by
and When Recorded
Return to:
City of West Sacramento
1110 West Capitol Avenue
West Sacramento, California 95691
No recording fee required pursuant
to Government Code Section 27383
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
AMENDMENT TO ALURA AT WASHINGTON SQUARE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This First Amendment to the Alura at Washington Square Development Agreement ("Amendment") is entered into on the _____day of _________________, 2022, by and between BLACKPINE 440 WEST LLC, a California limited liability company (“Developer”) and the CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, a municipal corporation (“City”).
RECITALS
A. The City and Developer executed the Alura at Washington Square Development Agreement on October 14, 2020 (“Alura Development Agreement”) related to a residential development project on approximately 2.9 acres bounded by E Street, Union Pacific main railroad tracks, 6th Street, and 8th Street (“Project”) and as approved by the City Council on October 14, 2020 via Ordinance No. 20-11, a memorandum of which was recorded by the Yolo County Recorder. A legal description of the Property is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
B. Pursuant to Section 5.2 of the Development Agreement, a one year extension of the Alura Development Agreement was approved by the parties effective October 20, 2021 and recorded against the property comprising the Project by the Yolo County Recorder on October 25, 2021 (the "Extension"). The Extension extended the term of the Alura Development Agreement until November 13, 2022.
C. The Parties have been working in good faith on a successor development agreement for an expanded project, but the successor development agreement is not yet completed. The Parties wish to extend the term of the Alura Development Agreement until May 13, 2023.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree to amend the Development Agreement as follows:
1. Amendment of Section 5.2. Section 5.2 of the Development Agreement shall be amended to read as follows:
“5.2. Term. Unless terminated early in accordance with the terms set forth herein, this Agreement shall expire on May 13, 2023.”
2. Remainder of Provisions of Alura Development Agreement Unaffected. Except as expressly provided herein, nothing in this Amendment shall be deemed to waive or modify any of the 651
2243260.1 2
other provisions of the Development Agreement. In the event of any conflict between this Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall prevail.
3. Recordation of Amendment. Upon execution this Amendment shall be recorded with this Yolo County Recorder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been executed by the parties on the day and year first written above.
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO BLACKPINE 440 WEST LLC
A municipal corporation A California limited liability company By: ______________________ By: _________________________ Martha Guerrero, Mayor Michael Paris, Managing Member
ATTEST:
By: ______________________
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDMAN & GIRARD
A professional corporation
By: _______________________
Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney
652
2243260.1 3
State of California
County of ___________________
On before me, ,
Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
State of California
State of California
County of ___________________
On before me, ,
Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
653
2243260.1 4
Exhibit A
Legal Description
The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California and is described as follows:
County: Yolo City: West Sacramento
APNs 010-191-011 -012, -013, -017, & 010-192-003
APN: 010-191-011
Lots 19 and 20, Block 28, Town of Washington, filed June 26, 1869 in Book I of Deeds, at Pages 264 and 265, Yolo County Records, together with that portion of Westerly onehalf of Sixth Street vacated by Resolution No. 00-38, recorded June 3, 2003, Instrument No. 2003-0032007, Yolo County Records.
Excepting therefrom the following:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Lot 19; thence along the Easterly line of said Lot 19, South 8°33'30" West, 9.50 feet; thence leaving said Easterly line, North 88°56'15" West, 53.66 feet to a point on the Westerly line of said Lot 20; thence along said Westerly line North 8°33'30" East, 16.50 feet to the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 20; thence along the Northerly line of said Lots 20 and 19, South 81°26'30" East,
53.20 feet to the point of beginning.
Also excepting therefrom, any portion of the herein described land that may lie within the lands of the Southern Pacific Railroad or its successors, that are within that portion of Sixth Street as vacated by Resolution No. 00-38, recorded June 3, 2003, as Instrument No. 2003-0032007, Yolo County Records.
APN: 010-191-017 (portion)
A portion of Lot 21, Block 28, Town of Washington, filed June 26, 1869 in Book I of Deeds, Pages 264 and 265, Yolo County Records, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point in the Easterly line of said Lot 21 that is distant South 8°33'30" West, thereon 16.50 feet from the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 21; thence along said Easterly line, South 8°33'30" West, 63.50 feet to a point on the Southerly line of said Lot 21; thence along said Southerly line North 81°26'30" West, 26.60 feet to a point on the Westerly line of said Lot 21; thence along said Westerly line North 8°33'30" East, 60.00 feet; thence leaving said Westerly line, South 88°56'15" East, 56.83 feet to the point of beginning.
Excepting therefrom all of the minerals and mineral ores of every kind and character now known to exist or hereafter discovered upon, within or underlying limiting the generality of the foregoing, all petroleum, oil, natural gas or other hydrocarbon substances and products derived therefrom, together with the exclusive and perpetual right of said grantor, its successors and assigns, or ingress and egress beneath the surface of said property to explore for, extract, mine and remove the same, and to make such use of the said property beneath the surface as is necessary or useful in 654
2243260.1 5
connection therewith, which use may include lateral or slant drilling, boring, drilling, boring, digging or sinking of wells, shafts or tunnels; provided, however, that said grantor, its successors and assigns, shall not use the surface of said property in the exercise of any of said rights, and shall not disturb the surface of said property, or any improvements thereon, as reserved by Southern Pacific Company in deed recorded April 16, 1958 in Book 539 of Official Records, at Page 433, Yolo County Records.
APN: 010-191-017 (portion)
Lots 22, 23, 24 and 25, Block 28, Town of Washington, filed June 26, 1869 in Book I of Deeds, Page 264 and 265, Yolo County Records.
Excepting therefrom the following:
Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 22; thence along the Easterly line of said Lot 22, South 8°33'30" West, 20.00 feet; thence leaving said Easterly line, North 88°56'15" West, 108.12 feet to a point on the Westerly line of said Lot 25; thence along said Westerly line North 8°33'30" East, 34.10 feet to the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 25; thence along the Northerly line of said Lots 25, 24, 23 and 22, South 81°26'30" East, 107.20 feet to the point of beginning.
APN: 010-191-012, 010-191-013
Lots 17 and 18, Block 28, Town of Washington, filed June 26, 1869 in Book I of Deeds, Pages 264 and 265, Yolo County Records, together with that portion of the Westerly one-half of Sixth Street vacated by Resolution No. 00-38, recorded June 3, 2003, as Instrument No. 2003-0032007, Yolo County Records.
APN: 010-192-003
Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30, Block 23, Town of Washington, filed June 26, 1869 in Book I of Deeds, Page 264, Yolo County Records. Together with that portion of Sixth Street vacated in the Resolution recorded June 3, 2003 as Instrument No. 2003-0032007, Official Records.
655
Attachment 4
Project Entitlement History
April 20, 2006 Original Tentative Map (TM) approved for project (1.05-acre site for 25 single-family homes)
November 15, 2007 Modification to TM 4936 approved for project (adding 41 residential units)
2008
State legislature approved multiple TM extensions due to the economic downturn, setting TM 4936’s expiration to November 15, 2017
February 4, 2016 Modification to TM 4936 approved for project (removing two units and adding a common area)
June 15, 2017 Two-year time extension to TM 4936 approved for project, setting the new expiration date to November 15, 2019
September 19, 2019 One-year time extension to TM 4936 approved for the project, setting the new expiration date to November 15, 2020
October 14, 2020
Development Agreement (DA) approved for the project, providing one-year extension, with option for an additional year, to TM 4936, setting the new expiration date to November 13, 2021
July 15, 2021 Approval of TM 5211 and approval of modifications to TM 4936.
October 20, 2021 Option to extend DA for an additional year approved, setting new expiration date for TM 4936 to November 13, 2022.
656
Attachment 5
Findings and Analysis
REQUIRED FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS:
To recommend approval of the First Amendment to the Development Agreement, the Planning Commission must be able to make the following findings. The Finding (in italics) is followed by the Staff analysis of whether or not the Finding can be made.
1. That the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and the Washington Specific Plan.
Analysis: The proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement is being enacted to allow additional time for development due to the COVID 19 pandemic. The project has previously been found to be in compliance with the West Sacramento General Plan and Washington Specific Plan.
Finding 1 appears to be met for this request.
2. That the proposed Development Agreement is consistent with the provisions of Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5.
Analysis: Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5 include State codes for regulating Development Agreements. The codes include procedures for executing and modifying Development Agreements. The proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement and the process by which it is being considered by the City and the applicant is consistent with the applicable State requirements.
Finding 2 appears to be met for this request.
657
Statutory Exemptions. State code number:
_______________________________________________
Notice of Exemption
To: Office of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency): ____________________________ P.O. Box 3044, Room 113 _______________________________________________ Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 County Clerk
(Address)
___________________________
___________________________
County of: __________________
Project Title: ____________________________________________________________________________ Project Applicant: ________________________________________________________________________ Project Location - Specific:
Project Location - City: ______________________ Project Location - County:
Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:
_____________________
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: _____________________________________________________ Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: ________________________________________________ Exempt Status: (check one):
Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
Reasons why project is exempt:
Lead Agency
Contact Person: ____________________________ Area Code/Telephone/Extension: _______________ If filed by applicant:
1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Signature: ____________________________ Date:
Signed by Lead Agency Signed by Applicant
Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code. Date Received for filing at OPR:
Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code. _______________
Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: ____________________________________ ______________________________________________
______________ Title: _______________________
Revised 2011
Attachment 6
Appendix E
658
RESOLUTION 22-2PC
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF A FIRST AMENDMENT TO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH BLACKPINE 440 WEST LLC
PERTAINING TO DEVELOPMENT OF THE ALURA (FOUR 40 WEST) RESIDENTIAL
PROJECT
WHEREAS, on October 6, 2022, the West Sacramento Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on a First Amendment to a Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has duly considered all information before them; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement is consistent with the goals, policies and implementation programs of the City of West Sacramento General Plan, and WHEREAS, the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to §15332, of the CEQA Guidelines, as the project would be located on a parcel characterized as in-fill development that is consistent with the General Plan and occurs within the city limits on a project site of no more than five acres and which contains no valuable habitat.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement furthers the public health, safety and general welfare of the City, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement via Ordinance 22- 19 with the additional provision that an additional six-month extension may be added at the City Manager’s discretion.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of West Sacramento this 6th of October 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Aria Berliner,
Planning Commission Chairperson
DEANDA, HIRSCH, SABLAN, ESQUIVEL, STIGER, LOCKHART, BERLINER None
None
None
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9B1390EE-F8AD-4FB2-82BF-800B922FDA2B 659
David W. Tilley, Secretary
ATTEST:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9B1390EE-F8AD-4FB2-82BF-800B922FDA2B 660
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: October 19, 2022 ITEM # 20
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 22-122 ADDING
A CARRY CONCEALED WEAPON APPLICATION FEE TO THE CITY BOOK OF FEES INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [ X ] Staff
[ ] Other
Dawna Jones, Senior Analyst
Police Department
ATTACHMENT [ X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [ X ] Action
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide information for the purpose of conducting a public hearing for Council consideration of Resolution 22-122 adding a Concealed Carry Weapon permit application fee to the Book of Fees.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1. Open and conduct a public hearing; and
2. Adopt Resolution 22-122 adding a Concealed Carry Weapon permit fee structure to the Book of Fees.
BACKGROUND
California Penal Code §26155 grants the authority to issue “concealed carry weapons” (“CCW”) licenses, also known colloquially as “CCW permits,” to “the chief or other head of a municipal police department of any city.” However, California Penal Code §26155(c) allows the chief to enter “an agreement with the sheriff of the county in which the city is located for the sheriff to process all applications for licenses, renewals of licenses, and amendments to licenses, pursuant to this chapter.”
Historically, the Yolo County Sheriff’s Department received and processed all CCW application in Yolo County although no record of a formal agreement could be found between the City of West Sacramento and the Yolo County Sheriff’s Department. In April 2022, the Yolo County Sheriff advised all Yolo County municipal police chiefs the Sheriff’s Office would cease accepting and processing CCW license applications from residents of the incorporated cities effective July 1, 2022.
ANALYSIS
State law and subsequently established case law regulates the process for accepting and processing CCW license applications and issuing CCW licenses. West Sacramento Police Department maintains a model policy drafted by Lexipol that reflects current law (refer to Attachment 2, “License to Carry a Firearm”).
As the CCW application process is administratively time consuming, the Department contracted with Permitium, a company which has developed a web-based computer program that helps automate the application process, assists in collecting required fees, tracks the application process, and maintains the CCW license records. Many agencies throughout the United States, in California, and in our region utilize this program. The Department is in the process of developing the required backend to implement this program.
Pursuant to the California Government Code §66000 et seq. and California Penal Code §26190(b)(1), fees can be assessed to recoup an amount equal to the reasonable costs associated with processing CCW applications, issuing CCW licenses, and enforcing the license. Police Department and Finance personnel estimated the time and materials that would be required to provide this service, reviewed fees assessed by other agencies in our region that are already providing this service, and subsequently developed the proposed fee schedule to provide this service.
It should be noted that the proposed fee schedule in Attachment 1 reflects the new fees that the City of West Sacramento will be charging for this service and includes other associated fees already established by outside agencies that are passed through to the applicant, such as the Livescan (fingerprinting) fee, as well as fees charged by Permitium and by the California Department of Justice. Passthrough fees may be updated at any time without Council action as they are updated by their respective agencies. Other costs will also be incurred by applicants, such as those costs associated with receiving the required “CCW” training by authorized third parties. 661
Carry Concealed Weapon Fees
October 19, 2022
The Department seeks to implement the proposed changes to the City Book of Fees to recoup the costs associated with the CCW permit program.
Environmental Considerations
This action is not a project that is subject to CEQA because it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21065; CEQA Guidelines § 15060(c), 15378(a).)
Commission Recommendation
N/A
Strategic Plan Integration
This action will support the City’s vision of a financially sound city and people feeling safe and secure.
Alternatives
Council may direct staff to revise the proposed fee structure.
Coordination and Review
This proposed fee was coordinated with the Finance Department, City Attorney and Police Department.
Budget/Cost Impact
There is minimal fiscal impact as fees are intended to recoup incurred administrative costs.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution 22-122 with Exhibit A (City of West Sacramento Fee Schedule for Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) license processing)
2. West Sacramento Police Department Policy 218, “License to Carry a Firearm”
3. Cost Analysis Breakdown
662
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 22-122
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
AMMENDING THE BOOK OF FEES TO ADD CONCEALED CARRY WEAPONS (CCW)
PERMIT APPLICATION FEES
WHEREAS, California Penal Code §26155 grants the authority to issue “concealed carry weapons” (“CCW”) licenses, also known colloquially as “CCW permits,” to “the chief or other head of a municipal police department of any city.”; and
WHEREAS, historically, the Yolo County Sheriff’s Department received and processed all CCW applications in Yolo County; and
WHEREAS, in April 2022, the Yolo County Sheriff advised all Yolo County municipal police chiefs the Sheriff’s Office would cease accepting and processing CCW license applications from residents of the incorporated cities effective July 1, 2022; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Government Code §66000 et seq., and California Penal Code §26190(b)(1), fees can be assessed to recoup an amount equal to the reasonable costs associated with processing CCW applications, issuing CCW licenses, and enforcing the license; and
WHEREAS, the Police Department and Finance personnel estimated the time and materials that would be required to provide this service, reviewed fees assessed by other agencies in our region that are already providing this service, and subsequently developed the proposed fee schedule to provide this service; and
WHEREAS, the proposed fee schedule reflects the new fees that the City of West Sacramento will be charging for this service, including other associated fees collected by the City of West Sacramento and passed through to other agencies, such as the Livescan (fingerprinting) fee, as well as fees charged by Permitium (a CCW program administration company) and by the California Department of Justice. Other costs will also be incurred by applicants, such as those costs associated with receiving the required “CCW” training by authorized outside third parties.
Pass through fees may be updated at any time without Council action based on updates to the fees by their respective agencies.
WHEREAS, the Department seeks to implement the proposed changes to the City Book of Fees to recoup the costs associated with the CCW permit program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento that:
1. The City Council hereby approves updates to the Book of Fees, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A to this Resolution The City Council finds that as required by various government codes, it has held at least one public hearing at which oral or written presentations could be made, as a part of a regularly scheduled meeting, and that notice of the time and place of the meeting, including a general explanation of the matter to be considered and a statement that the data of this matter is available, was noticed by publication two times over a period of ten days with at least five days intervening between dates of publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City; and a fist class mailing was made to anyone filing a written request.
663
Resolution 22-122
2. The City Council finds that the fees specified by this Resolution do not exceed the cost of providing the product or service or the regulation for which the fee is levied.
3. The fees and charges adopted herein are to become effective 60 dates from the date of adoption by City Council (December 19, 2022), unless otherwise indicated on the fee schedule or provided for in California law. Fees will not be assessed until the effective date, but will apply retroactively to applications received as of July 1, 2022.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of October, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
Position
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
Records Clerk $ 74.42
Chief $ 318.29
Sergeant $ 182.55
Records Clerk Chief Sergeant City Fee
Initial fee $ 18.61 $ 79.57 $ 91.28 $ 189.45
Renewal fee $ - $ - $ 25.00 $ 25.00
Modification fee $ - $ - $ 10.00 $ 10.00
Records Clerk Chief Sergeant
Initial fee $ 18.61 $ 79.57 $ 91.28 $ 189.45
Renewal fee $ - $ - $ 25.00 $ 25.00
Modification fee $ - $ - $ 10.00 $ 10.00
Records Clerk Chief Sergeant
Initial fee $ 18.61 $ 79.57 $ 91.28 $ 189.45
Renewal fee $ - $ - $ 25.00 $ 25.00
Modification fee $ - $ - $ 10.00 $ 10.00
Note: Fees in yellow are limited to the maximum allowed by the Penal Code
STANDARD
2 YEAR
JUDICIAL
3 YEAR
RESERVE
4 YEAR
City of West Sacramento Book of Fees
CCW Permit Application Processing
672
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
BOOK OF FEES
Description Authority Effective Date
POLICE REGULATION FEES
Resolution 22-
1220-3
Feb. 20,
2019Oct. 19,
2022
Fee Schedule
Administered by Administrative Services – Finance Division Page 1 of 2 A. TOBACCO RETAILER’S PERMIT
Tobacco Retailer Permits and related enforcement are provided by Yolo County in accordance with Ordinance 20-1 (Municipal Code Section 9.30) and related agreement adopted by City Council on January 15, 2020. Please refer to Yolo County’s Master Fee Schedule for fees related to the Tobacco Retailer Permit program.
B. POLICE PERMIT RENEWAL PENALTY
A one-time penalty of 100% of annual fee shall be added to each Police permit renewed after expiration date
C. FINGERPRINT PROCESSING FEES
Fingerprinting: Live Scan $25
Additional DOJ/FBI fees may be added
Fingerprinting: ink-rolled prints $10
Additional Live Scan charges
Fingerprints sent to the Department of Justice (one-time charge) $32 Fingerprints sent to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (one-time charge) $24 These amounts, representing charges to the City as of the effective date, may be amended without City Council action to reflect changes in DOJ and FBI charges.
D. CIVIL SUBPOENAS FOR SWORN PERSONNEL
Flat fee per appearance $275
E. CONCEALED CARRY WEAPONS (CCW) PERMIT
City Fee DOJ Livescan Fee* State Fee* Total CCW Cost Phase A Phase B Initial fee $ 189.00 $ 93.00 $ - $ 282.00 $ 56.00 $ 226.00 Renewal fee $ 25.00 $ - $ 52.00 $ 77.00 $ 15.00 $ 62.00 Modification fee $ 10.00 $ - $ - $ 10.00 $ 2.00 $ 8.00
STANDARD
2 YEAR
DOJ Livescan Fee* State Fee* Total CCW Cost Phase A Phase B Initial fee $ 189.00 $ 115.00 $ - $ 304.00 $ 61.00 $ 243.00 Renewal fee $ 25.00 $ - $ 74.00 $ 99.00 $ 20.00 $ 79.00 Modification fee $ 10.00 $ - $ - $ 10.00 $ 2.00 $ 8.00
JUDICIAL
3 YEAR
DOJ Livescan Fee* State Fee* Total CCW Cost Phase A Phase B Initial fee $ 189.00 $ 137.00 $ - $ 326.00 $ 65.00 $ 261.00 Renewal fee $ 25.00 $ - $ 96.00 $ 121.00 $ 24.00 $ 97.00 Modification fee $ 10.00 $ - $ - $ 10.00 $ 2.00 $ 8.00
RESERVE
4 YEAR
673
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
BOOK OF FEES
Description Authority Effective Date
POLICE REGULATION FEES
Resolution 22-
1220-3
Feb. 20,
2019Oct. 19,
2022
Fee Schedule
Administered by Administrative Services – Finance Division Page 2 of 2 *These amounts include fees passed through by the State of California and the Department of Justice. Passthrough fees may be amended without City Council action to reflect changes in State or DOJ charges.
HISTORY:
AUTHORITY DATE ACTION
Res. 10-3 02/13/10 Add Tobacco Retailer’s fees
Res. 16-48 06/15/16 Add section F
Res. 17-60 10/18/17 Remove previous sections A and B
Res. 20-3
Res. 22-122
02/19/20
10/19/22
Update Section A: Tobacco Retailer’s Permit
Add Section E: Concealed Carry Weapons (CCW) Permit
674