West Sacramento City Council
April 19, 2023

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL AND

WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND

WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
City Council Regular Meeting
APRIL 19, 2023 AGENDA
Martha Guerrero, Mayor
Quirina Orozco, Mayor Pro Tem
Norma Alcala, Council Member
Dawnté Early, Council Member
Verna Sulpizio Hull, Council Member
Aaron Laurel, City Manager
Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney
6:30 PM Closed Session Call to Order
7:00 PM Regular Meeting Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Land Acknowledgment
The meeting will be held at City Hall, City Council Chambers, 1110 West Capitol Avenue, West Sacramento
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART I

1. PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WITHIN THE

JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL
The Council is prohibited from discussing issues not on the agenda brought to them at this time.

According to State Law (the Brown Act), items must first be noticed on the agenda before any discussion or action.

PRESENTATIONS

2. Economic Development & Housing

CONSIDERATION OF A PROCLAMATION OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL

RECOGNIZING THE PALAMIDESSI FAMILY FOR THEIR DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY

CONSENT AGENDA

3. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH INDIGO | HAMMOND + PLAYLE ARCHITECTS FOR ARCHITECT AND DESIGN SERVICES FOR FIRE STATION 43 RESTROOM REMODEL PROJECT (CIP 51031) Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to approve Amendment No. 1 to the professional services contract with Indigo | Hammond + Playle Anyone wishing to address the Council, or any agenda item, may fill out the Request to Speak card and present it to the City Clerk prior to the completion of staff presentation. Items on the Consent Agenda will be considered in one motion and the Request to Speak card should be turned in prior to the first item on Consent.
1 Architects for the Architect and Design Services for the Fire Station 43 Restroom Remodel Project (CIP 51031).

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Approve Amendment No. 1 to the professional services contract with Indigo | Hammond + Playle Architects in the amount of $70,638 for the Architect and Design Services for the Fire Station 43 Restroom Remodel Project (CIP 51031); and (2) Delegate authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the Amendment No. 1 to the professional services contract with Indigo | Hammond + Playle Architects.

4. Capital Projects

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH 4LEAF, Inc. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION & ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECTS (CIPs 17023 & 17024)
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to approve a Professional Services Contract with 4LEAF, Inc for construction management services for the Neighborhood Pavement Preservation & Arterial Streets Pavement Repair Projects. (CIPs 17023 & 17024)
Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Find that the Professional Services Contract with 4LEAF, Inc. for construction management services for the Neighborhood Pavement Preservation & Arterial Streets Pavement Repair Projects is exempt from CEQA under the Class 1 Categorical Exemption under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15301; (2) Award a professional services contract with 4LEAF, Inc. for construction management services for the Neighborhood Pavement Preservation & Arterial Streets Pavement Repair Projects; (3) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute a professional services contract with 4LEAF, Inc for an amount not to exceed $202,379.40; (4) Authorize the City Manager to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the Contract for Professional Services, with approval from the City Attorney; (5) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to make contract amendments up to 15% ($30,356.91) of the value of the contract.

5. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING AND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 23-5 AMENDING TITLE 10 (VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE REESTABLISHMENT OF SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (CIP 12019)
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to consider the approval of proposed amendments to Title 10 of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Waive the second reading and read by title and number only, Ordinance 23-5, amending Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento; and (2) Approve Ordinance 23-5, amending Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento.

6. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT #3 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

CONTRACT WITH BENNETT ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE E & F STREETS FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP 15047)
2 Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information for approval of Amendment Number 3 to the professional services contract with Bennett Engineering Services for the E & F Streets Frontage Improvement Project (CIP 15047).

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment #3 for the professional services contract with Bennett Engineering Services to extend the term.

7. Community Development

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF PRE-QUALIFIED ON-CALL LIST OF CONSULTANTS

FOR BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES
Objective: The purpose of this report is to facilitate City Council consideration of a pre-qualified oncall list of consultants to provide as-needed building plan review and inspection support services starting July 1, 2023.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve a pre-qualified oncall list for building plan review and inspection support services.

8. Economic Development & Housing
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-33 DECLARING CITY-OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2525 JEFFERSON BOULEVARD AS SURPLUS PROPERTY Objective: The objective of this report is to provide information to the City Council to consider adoption of Resolution 23-33 declaring City-owned Property located at 2525 Jefferson Boulevard as surplus property.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 23-33 declaring City-owned property located at 2525 Jefferson Boulevard as surplus property.

9. Economic Development & Housing

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF EXERCISE OF OPTION TO EXTEND THE TERM OF THE ALURA AT WASHINGTON SQUARE (FOUR 40 WEST) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH BLACKPINE 440 WEST, LLC
Objective: The purpose of this item is to facilitate the Council’s consideration of whether to exercise the City’s option to extend the term of an existing Development Agreement between Blackpine 440 West, LLC and the City of West Sacramento (City) for a future project located at 412-420 & 425 6th Street in the Washington District.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve the exercise by the City of the option to extend the term of the Alura at Washington Square (Four 40 West) Development Agreement for an additional six months, setting the Agreement’s expiration to November 13, 2023.

10. Fire
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-9 DECLARING WEEDS GROWING ON CERTAIN

LOTS TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND SCHEDULING A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER

OBJECTIONS TO WEED ABATEMENT
Objective: The purpose of this report is to initiate the 2023 Weed Abatement Program which is a proactive approach to reducing the risk of vegetation fires. This item requests City Council adoption of a resolution declaring a list of lots to be hazards and set a public hearing at the May 3, 2023 City 3 Council meeting to consider objections to the proposed removal of weeds. The program provides for weed abatement by the City’s contractor to commence on May 12, 2023.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Adopt Resolution 23-9 declaring weeds growing on certain lots to be a public nuisance and initiating the 2023 weed abatement program. The Resolution further directs the Fire Department to begin the formal weed abatement process by notifying all affected property owners by mail of the intended action by April 20, 2023; and (2) Set a public hearing at its regular meeting of May 3, 2023, to consider objections to the proposed removal of weeds.

11. Public Works

CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF A CONTRACT TO SUMMIT PIPELINE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE WASTEWATER CCTV INSPECTION PROJECT (CIP 33029) Objective: The objective of this report is to provide sufficient information to the City Council for consideration of a contract award to Summit Pipelines for the Wastewater CCTV Inspection project.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Approve and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a professional service contract with Summit Pipelines in the amount of $250,000 for the Wastewater CCTV Inspection Project (CIP 33029); and (2) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments or change orders up to 7% ($17,500) of the value of the contract.

12. Public Works

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF WORK TRUCKS FOR THE

WATER DIVISION IN SUPPORT OF BACKFLOW AND WATER METER READING AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 23-31 APPROPRIATING FUNDS
Objective: The purpose of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to approve the purchase of two work trucks for the Water Division to support Backflow and Water Meter Reading functions.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends the City Council: (1) Approve Budget Resolution 23-31 appropriating water enterprise funds for the purchase of two vehicles; and (2) Approve the purchase of two utility bed work trucks to support staff in the Water Distribution and Backflow areas of the Water Division.

13. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 23-29, 2023 AS NATIONAL

LIBRARY WEEK
Objective: To provide awareness about the contributions of the Yolo County Library system, specifically how the Arthur F. Turner Community library in West Sacramento adds value to the lives of residents.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt a proclamation declaring April 23-29, 2023 as National Library Week.

14. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH

KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMAN & GIRARD
4 Objective: The purpose of this report is to request that the City Council approve an amendment to the contract with Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedeman & Girard (KMTG), the City’s contract legal counsel, to update the schedule of rates for services.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 3 to the Legal Services Agreement with KMTG to update the schedule of rates for services, effective May 1, 2023.

15. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF RATIFICATION OF STRATEGIC PLAN SUMMARY FOR 2023 Objective: The purpose of this report is to seek ratification of the Council’s Strategic Plan Summary for 2023.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council review and ratify the attached Strategic Plan Summary for 2023.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

16. Community Development
PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 23-4

PERTAINING TO AN AMENDMENT TO THE TERM OF THE YARBROUGH DEVELOPMENT

AGREEMENT
Objective: The purpose of this item is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to consider an amendment to the term of the existing Yarbrough Development Agreement between ASB Southport II LLC and the City of West Sacramento.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Conduct the public hearing; (2) Find that the amendment to the term of the existing Yarbrough Development Agreement between ASB Southport II LLC. and the City of West Sacramento does not require further environmental review pursuant to Sections 15162 and 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines; and (3) Waive first reading and read by title only Ordinance 23-4 amending the term of the Yarbrough Development Agreement between ASB Southport II LLC and the City of West Sacramento.

REGULAR AGENDA
NONE
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART II

17. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS
Bikeshare Policy Steering Committee --------------------------------------------Guerrero, Alternate - Early City/County 2x2 ----------------------------------------------------Guerrero/Orozco, Alternate – Sulpizio Hull City/School 2x2 ------------------------------------------------------Guerrero/Sulpizio Hull, Alternate - Alcala Executive Commission to Address Homelessness --------------------Sulpizio Hull, Alternate - Orozco EIFD Public Financing Authority----------------------------------------------------Vacant, Alternate - Vacant League of California Cities --------------------------------------------------- Alcala, Alternate – Sulpizio Hull Local Agency Formation Commission ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Alcala Port District Commission ---------------------------------------------------------Guerrero, Early, Sulpizio Hull Remote Access Network ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Guerrero River City Regional Stadium Financing Authority------------------------------------------Guerrero, Orozco Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) ------------------------Guerrero; Alternate - Early Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District Board --------------Orozco; Alternate - Sulpizio Hull 5 Water Resources Association --------------------------------------------------Sulpizio Hull; Alternate - Early West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency JPA ----------------------------Alcala; Alternate - Orozco Yolo County Housing Authority-------------------------------------------------Early, Alternate - Sulpizio Hull Yolo County Transportation District -------------------------------------------Early, Alternate - Sulpizio Hull Yolo Habitat Conservancy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sulpizio Hull Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District ----------------------------Alcala; Alternate – Sulpizio Hull Yolo Subbasin Sustainable Groundwater Agency------------------------------------------------Sulpizio Hull

COUNCIL INTERMEDIARY REPRESENTATIVES
Delta Protection Commission -------------------------------------------------------Vacant; Alternate - Vacant New Hope Community Development Corporation---------------------------------Early; Alternate - Alcala Yolo County Consolidated Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board ---------------Vacant

18. COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS, REAPPOINTMENTS, REMOVALS TO/FROM CITY AND NONCITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS  Port Commission
 EIFD Public Financing Authority

19. PART II
A. Council Calendar
B. City Manager Report
C. City Attorney Report
D. Staff Direction from City Council Members
E. Future Agenda Item Requests by Council
F. Adjourn
I, Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk, declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the April 19, 2023 regular and closed session meetings of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency and Financing Authority was posted April 14, 2023 at the rear entrance at City Hall, 1110 West Capitol Avenue, West Sacramento, CA and was available for public review.

NOTE: If you challenge the nature of a proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.

The agenda and agenda reports are also available on the City’s website at www.cityofwestsacramento.org City Council meetings are broadcast live on Wave Cable Channel 20 and rerun the next day at 12:00 PM and the following Saturday at 6:00 PM.

All public materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are also made available for public inspection on the City’s website at:
www.cityofwestsacramento.org. Any document provided at the meeting by staff or by the public will be provided by the City Clerk upon request by phone at (916) 617-4500, or by email at: [email protected].

If you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 916-617- 4500 or [email protected]. Notify the City Clerk’s Office at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting. Assisted listening devices are available at this meeting. 6 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 19, 2023 ITEM # 2
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF A PROCLAMATION OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL

RECOGNIZING THE PALAMIDESSI FAMILY FOR THEIR DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Diane Richards, Economic Development Manager
Economic Development and Housing Department
ATTACHMENT [ X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [ X ] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to formally recognize the Palamidessi family for operating Club Pheasant Restaurant for 87 years and contributing to the quality of life in West Sacramento.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt a proclamation recognizing the Palamidessi Family for 87 years of dedicated service to Club Pheasant Restaurant and the City of West Sacramento.

BACKGROUND
In 1916, at the age of seventeen, George Palamidessi arrived in the United States from the small town of Lucca, Italy. He reached Sacramento by train with only a few dollars in his pocket, no place to stay, and was jobless.

Departing from the train, he crossed the street and entered the Commercial Hotel where he inquired about a job.

Speaking only Italian, George spoke with the owner, who luckily spoke Italian too, and George was given work as a scrub. George worked and lived at the hotel for about a year before he learned to cook and was recruited by some farmers from Ryer Island to cook for a group of farmhands. It was not long before George had the opportunity to farm himself. His father had farmed in Italy, and farming was a passion for George as well. It was during this time that he met Luisa Cappello. They were married in 1918 and during the next fourteen years, there were many hardships for the Palamidessi’s, but blessings too: four daughters (Rita, Angie, Dina and Anna) and one son (Peter).

George continued to farm and in 1935, he was able to purchase the Tiger Inn, a former speakeasy at 2525 Jefferson Boulevard, that included ten acres of land. It was there that Louisa began to serve lunches, sandwiches, and such, to local farmers under the name of the Hideaway Inn.

By 1945, all of the daughters were married but continued to work in the family restaurant with the exception of Rita who lived in the Bay Area. Angie’s husband, John Rivera joined the business, and Dina’s husband Fred Andreotti entered a few years later. Anna, who married Mario Mesquita, a farmer from Clarksburg, was the restaurant’s bookkeeper until her retirement in the mid-1990s.

In 1946, at the suggestion of Angie’s husband, John Rivera, the restaurant’s name was changed to Club Pheasant, and it became a full-scale dining establishment, serving both lunch and dinner. John also created the Club’s famous garlic steak sandwich, which became the perfect accompaniment to Luisa’s ravioli. The restaurant continued to operate under the tutelage of Luisa, John, Angie, Fred, and Dina until their retirement in the early 70s. In 1963, Ron Rivera, Angie and John’s son began working at the restaurant as a bartender, and shortly thereafter Peter Palamidessi left farming and entered the restaurant business as well. By the early 1970s, Ron Rivera, and Peter Palamidessi, became the sole proprietors.

In 1978 an expansion to the restaurant, “The Louisa Room” was constructed, more than doubling the seating capacity, enabling mid- to large-size parties and banquets to take place. Just a few years prior, Patti, Peter Jr., and Paul Palamidessi joined the family business. Peter Jr. and Paul tended the bar, and Patti ran the dining room and scheduled events. A few years later, Perry joined his brothers and sister.

Around 2001, an outdoor patio was built that allowed more guest seating and became a great venue for outdoor parties and music. In the late 1990s, Peter and Ron retired, selling the business to Peter Jr., Paul, Patti, and Perry. The restaurant continued operation under their leadership until its closing in December 2022. 7 Consideration of Council Proclamation for the Palamidessi Family April 19, 2023

Club Pheasant was the only restaurant destination in the area and grew to become a popular, local, and regional landmark. It was enjoyed by generations of local families and renowned throughout the Sacramento region for its garlic steak sandwiches, fried ravioli, and other Italian specialties. Over the years, the original building was expanded and remodeled several times and remains to this day. Club Pheasant became one of the City’s most iconic and beloved full-service restaurants, hosting thousands of business lunches, family celebrations, Rotary Club and Chamber of Commerce meetings.

In June 2022, the Palamidessi Family announced that after 87 years of operating Club Pheasant, they had made the difficult decision to close the restaurant and retire. A key component of the plan included the sale of the Property. Unfortunately, several development proposals being considered by the Palamidessi family included demolition of the building and/or bringing fast food operators to the site.

On November 16, 2022, the City Council authorized acquisition of the Property by the City, with the intent to preserve the legacy of the restaurant and property as a West Sacramento landmark, and create a community amenity.

ANALYSIS
The Palamidessi Family is one of the pioneering families in the City, becoming residents prior to the City’s incorporation, and establishing the first, family-friendly, full-service restaurant. Generations of residents have enjoyed their garlic steak sandwiches, homemade ravioli and other Italian delicacies. Staff is requesting that City Council consider a proclamation honoring the Palamidessi Family in recognition for their significant contributions to the City’s restaurant community, community character and quality of life in the City. The Palamidessi Family built Club Pheasant from its humble beginnings as a local café into a full-service regional restaurant destination with expanded dining areas and outdoor patios. The Palamidessi Family and Club Pheasant hosted countless family celebrations, youth sports events, and supported charitable organizations.

Environmental Considerations
This action is not a project that is subject to CEQA because it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21065; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15060(c), 15378(a).)
Commission Recommendation
N/A
Strategic Plan Integration
N/A
Alternatives
N/A
Coordination and Review
N/A
Budget/Cost Impact
N/A

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Proclamation
8 PROCLAMATION OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL HONORING THE PALAMIDESSI FAMILY FOR 87 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO CLUB PHEASANT RESTAURANT AND THE CITY

OF WEST SACRAMENTO
WHEREAS, GEORGE AND LUISA PALAMIDESSI were early pioneers to West Sacramento with their purchase of the “Tiger Inn” and ten acres of farmland in 1935. George farmed while Luisa began to serve lunches and sandwiches to local farmers under the name “Hideaway Inn”; and WHEREAS, GEORGE PALAMIDESSI established roots in the City and continued to farm while daughters Angie, Dina, Anna and Rita helped Louisa in the restaurant and son, Peter followed his father’s footsteps in farming; and
WHEREAS, in 1945, family members were joined by Angie’s husband, John Rivera, and Dina’s husband, Fred Andreotti, and in 1946, at the suggestion of John Rivera, the restaurant was renamed Club Pheasant, the famous garlic steak sandwich was created and the restaurant became the City’s first, full-service restaurant; and
WHEREAS, the Palamidessi Family’s dedication enabled Club Pheasant to become an iconic and beloved community gathering place for family celebrations, birthday parties and business meetings; and
WHEREAS, the Palamidessi Family continued to expand the restaurant and outdoor patio to accommodate larger groups and outdoor music events, contributing to a sense of place and community character; and
WHEREAS, for over 87 years, Club Pheasant employed five generations of descendants of George and Louisa, many residents and provided hundreds of local teenagers with their first working experience. These employees helped serve over 3 million garlic steak sandwiches and over 30 million ravioli; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY PROCLAIMED by the West Sacramento City Council that the PALAMIDESSI FAMILY be recognized for their significant and long-lasting contributions to the community and quality of life of the citizens of West Sacramento.

PROCLAIMED THIS 19th day of April 2023
ATTEST:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
9 10

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 19, 2023 ITEM # 3
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH INDIGO | HAMMOND + PLAYLE ARCHITECTS FOR
ARCHITECT AND DESIGN SERVICES FOR FIRE STATION 43
RESTROOM REMODEL PROJECT (CIP 51031)
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [x] Staff
[ ] Other
Jamie Teske, Senior Project Manager
Capital Projects Department
ATTACHMENT [x] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [x] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information for the approval of Amendment No. 1 to the professional services contract with Indigo | Hammond + Playle Architects for architect and design services for the Fire Station 43 Restroom Remodel Project (CIP 51031).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1) Approve Amendment No. 1 to the professional services contract with Indigo | Hammond + Playle Architects in the amount of $70,638 for architect and design services for the Fire Station 43 Restroom Remodel Project (CIP 51031); and
2) Delegate authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 to the professional services contract with Indigo | Hammond + Playle Architects.

BACKGROUND
Fire Station 43 was built in 1970 and is one of the oldest standing fire stations in West Sacramento. The station currently has one existing restroom for the entire facility serving all fire personnel and public guests. This restroom has never undergone renovations and/or upgrades, and needs to be updated to comply with applicable codes, regulations, and requirements. Due to the age of the restroom, it has shown significant signs of wear and tear, moisture damage, ventilation issues and plumbing failures.

On November 16, 2022, City Council entered into a professional services contract with Indigo | Hammond + Playle Architects, to provide architectural and design services for the Fire Station 43 Restroom Remodel Project. The project is currently in design and preparing to complete the schematic design phase.

ANALYSIS
During design, additional surveys were needed to proceed with the project. City Staff conducted an accessibility path of travel survey to determine essential improvements needed to meet the accessibility requirements for the renovation. The survey identified numerous locations within the fire station requiring accessibility improvements.

The project team determined it was necessary to revise the project scope of work to include the accessible path of travel and dorm improvements needed to achieve the project goals.

Environmental Considerations
This action is not subject to CEQA because it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21065; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15060(c), 15378(a).)
Commission Recommendation
Not applicable.

Strategic Plan Integration
This project is consistent with the City of West Sacramento’s Strategic Plan Mission to provide Quality Municipal Services, Quality City Infrastructure and Facilities and to Inspire Community Improvements that add value to the lives of our residents.

Alternatives
The Council’s primary alternatives are summarized below:
1) Approve the recommended actions as described above in this report. 11 AMENDMENT 1 CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECT AND DESIGN SERVICES FOR FIRE STATION 43 RESTROOM REMODEL

PROJECT
April 19, 2023

2) Reject the recommended actions or direct staff to alter the project. 3) Not approve the recommended action or delete the project.

Alternative 1 is the staff’s recommended action as the Fire Station 43 restrooms and dorms have excessive wear and tear and currently do not meet accessibility standards and requirements.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Capital Projects Department in coordination with and review by the Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
The Fire Station 43 Restroom Remodel Project is included in the City’s current Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as CIP project 51031. Adequate funding currently exists within the CIP budget for Amendment No.1. No additional funds are required or requested at this time.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Indigo | Hammond + Playle Architects Contract Amendment 1 & Proposal 12 Indigo | Hammond + Playle Architects
CPC22-331 Fire Station 43 Design Services
Expires 12/31/23
AMENDMENT NO. 1
to the

CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
between the

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
And
Indigo | Hammond + Playle Architects
Dated November 16, 2022
This Amendment No. 1 to the Contract for Services between the City of West Sacramento (City) and Indigo | Hammond + Playle (Consultant) dated November 16, 2022, for the Fire Station 43 Restroom Remodel Project, is made and entered into this 19th day of April 2023. Except as expressly amended herein, the November 16, 2022, Contract for Services is in full force and effect.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, in November 16, 2022, the City awarded a professional services contract to Indigo | Hammond + Playle to provide Architect and Design Services for the Fire Station 43 Restroom Remodel Project in the amount of $83,180; and
WHEREAS, the original contract had a clerical error in the proposal which indicated a contract total of $83,180 but correct contract amount should have been $83,818; and WHEREAS, additional scope was identified during the design phase that was not initially anticipated; and
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant desire to amend said contract to correct and increase; and
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by parties hereto to amend said agreement as follows:

I. SCOPE OF SERVICES:

The proposal as set forth in the Contract for Services dated November 16, 2022, shall be revised proposal with corrections as attached in Exhibit A. Scope of work shall be revised to include costs to renovate the dorm area and ADA path of travel required updates within Fire Station 43 as outlined in Exhibit B.

II. COMPENSATION:

The compensation as set forth in the Contract for Services dated November 16, 2022, shall be revised to include the following:

Initial compensation amount shall be increased by $638 to correct contract amount from $83,180 to $83,818. Additional compensation of $70,000.00 shall be added for the new scope added. Total compensation shall not exceed $153,818.00 without the City’s prior written approval.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 as the date herein set forth.

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
By:

Aaron Laurel, City Manager
Indigo | Hammond + Playle Architects
Attachment 1
13 Indigo | Hammond + Playle Architects
CPC22-331 Fire Station 43 Design Services
Expires 12/31/23
By:

Jon Hammond, Principal

APPROVED AS TO FORM
By:

Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By: ________________________________________________________ Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
14 Indigo | Hammond + Playle Architects
CPC22-331 Fire Station 43 Design Services
Expires 12/31/23

EXHIBIT A
15 Fee Proposal
City of West Sacramento
Architect and Design Services for Fire Station 43 – Restroom Remodel Project Indigo | Hammond + Playle Architects, LLP | corrected April 5, 2023 Note:

1. Structural Engineering work may or may not be necessary. Fee quoted here is an estimated allowance which will be only included if necessary.

2. Bidding and Construction Phase work is an estimated T&M allowance.

3. Civil Engineering work will probably not be necessary so there is no fee estimate included at this time.

4. If investigation of hidden plumbing conditions is necessary the add service fee is estimated to be $ 3,450.

Indigo
Architecture
Peters
MEP
Point 2
Structural
L&M
Civil
Pre-Design Phase $ 5,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 Assumes not
necessary
Design Phase $ 37,000 $ 12,318 $ 12,000 Assumes not
necessary
Bidding &
Construction
Phase
$ 11,500 2 $ 2,000 2 $ 2,000 Assumes not
necessary
$ 53,500 $ 15,318 $15,000 1  3
Total estimated architectural and MEP T&M not to exceed fee cap is: $ 68,818 If structural engineering is necessary, expect structural allowance of: $ 15,000 $ 83,818
16 Fee Schedule
Indigo Hammond + Playle Architects, LLP
Principal Architect $265
Architect $220
Senior Designer $195
Designer/ Drafter- Level 2 $160
Designer/ Drafter- Level 1 $140
Clerical $115
Overtime rate 1.5 times hourly rates above.

Consultants and reimbursable expenses are at 1.15 x cost.

Mileage at $0.585 per mile.

Rates subject to change from time-to-time.

Indigo Hammond + Playle Archtiects, LLP
2022 - 3rd Quarter
17 Indigo | Hammond + Playle Architects
CPC22-331 Fire Station 43 Design Services
Expires 12/31/23

EXHIBIT B
18 19
Note:

1. Structural Engineering work may or may not be necessary. Fee quoted here is an estimated allowance which will be only included if necessary.

2. Bidding and Construction Phase work is an estimated T&M allowance.

3. Civil Engineering work will probably not be necessary so there is no fee estimate included at this time.

4. If investigation of hidden plumbing conditions is necessary,

5. The add service fee is estimated to be $ 3,450.

All the other provisions of our November 16, 2022 Agreement will remain in effect.

Please call me if you have any questions. I look forward to continuing our work with you on this project.
�
e�
Jonathan Hammond, AIA, C 27227
2 INDIGO I Hammond+ Playle Architects, LLP j 909 Fifth Street, Davis, CA It 530.750.0756 I w indigoarch.com 20

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 19, 2023 ITEM # 4
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH 4LEAF, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE

NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION & ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECTS (CIPS 17021, 17023 17024 & 17026)
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Christian Asuncion, Associate Civil Engineer
Kevin Tan, Assistant Civil Engineer
Capital Projects Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to approve a Professional Services Contract with 4LEAF, Inc. for construction management services for the Neighborhood Pavement Preservation & Arterial Streets Pavement Repair Projects. (CIPs 17021, 17023 17024 & 17026)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1) Find that the Professional Services Contract with 4LEAF, Inc. for construction management services for the Neighborhood Pavement Preservation & Arterial Streets Pavement Repair Projects is exempt from CEQA under the Class 1 Categorical Exemption under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15301;
2) Award a professional services contract with 4LEAF, Inc for construction management services for the Neighborhood Pavement Preservation & Arterial Streets Pavement Repair Projects; 3) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute a professional services contract with 4LEAF, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $202,379.40; and
4) Authorize the City Manager to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the Contract for Professional Services, with approval from the City Attorney; and 5) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to make contract amendments up to 15% ($30,356.91) of the value of the contract.

BACKGROUND
The City West Sacramento first established a Pavement Management System (PMS) in 1991 to help identify, track, and prioritize roadway maintenance, rehabilitation and pavement preservation treatments. Additional updates to the PMS were completed in 1999, 2005, 2013 and 2018. An update to the PMS will be proposed as a project in the upcoming CIP budget this Spring. Over the years, the scope of street pavement rehabilitationprojects has expanded as mandated by regulation to include improvements related to ADA compliance and complete streets emphasizing better bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Further, an up-to-date PMS is now required to be eligible for federal and state grants for road repair and preservation.

The PMS update contains information necessary to understand the City's current and long term needs relative to maintenance, rehabilitation and preservation. It details both the short term and long-term costs associated with implementing the PMS program. Implementation of the PMS has guided the City in its prioritization of road maintenance, rehabilitation and preservation, and has highlighted the need for additional funding to properly maintain the City's roadways. Over the past few years, the City has been receiving numerous pothole complaints and experiencing pavement failures on a variety of its streets. As in most localities, the City has three basic needs relative to pavement management: maintenance,preservation, and rehabilitation. •Maintenance: There are two types of maintenance: "reactive" maintenance and "planned" maintenance.

Examples of reactive maintenance include the filling of potholes with "cold-mix" asphalt, installing downed traffic signs, removal of graffiti, street sweeping, traffic signal maintenance, and unplugging of storm drain grates.

Examples of planned maintenance include work performed by contractors for items such as deep grinding and patching with "hot-mix" asphalt repairs of failing pavement in select locations and major striping along heavily travelled corridors separate from other capital projects. This work is typically done through the public bidding of smaller construction contracts.
•Preservation: The National Center for Pavement Preservation defines pavement preservation as "a costeffective set of practices that extend pavement life and improve safety and motorist satisfaction while saving 21 Professional Services Contract with 4LEAF Inc
April 19, 2023

public tax dollars." Essentially, a pavement preservation program seeks to create a system of implementing relatively small-scale projects on roads such as slurry seals, chip seals, and thin overlays in a specific schedule prior to structural degradation to avoid the necessity of a total road reconstruction. Successful pavement preservation can result in long term savings by reducing higher cost reconstruction needs, reduced traffic congestion with smoother rideability, and safer roads when combined with regular refreshing of pavement delineation. Pavement preservation should be accepted as good city philosophy, an important priority, and worthy long-term commitment.
•Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation of roads is generally defined as doing whatever is necessary to bring the road up to current standards for pavement and items such as construction of curb, gutter, and storm drains. It can include the complete removal of pavement, base and subgrade, if necessary, in certain areas of pavement failure, or it can be as simple as a pavement overlay in areas where the pavement hasn't failed. An example of rehabilitation would be the recently completed West Capitol Avenue Road Rehabilitation and Safety Enhancement Project.

In 2019, City staff developed and the City Council approved a Pavement Management Plan based on policy guidance received from the TMI Commission and City Council. The plan consists of the following two programs that are prioritized and adjusted based on funding levels authorized by the City Council through the Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

Neighborhood Preservation Program
This program is focused on preserving and maintaining local roadways in a given area each year but will still have the flexibility to triage needs along major arterials. Staff has broken the City into 10 areas approximately based on land use, major barriers (freeways, railroads, arterials, etc.), and proximity. These categories were chosen because they lead to more cost-effective projects. For example, a pavement treatment used in rural areas would not be advisable for suburban residential application, also a collection of roadways in close proximity to each other reduces costs during construction. It is important to note that because the needs in each region far exceed the available funds, this program would not pave every road in an area or even fully rehabilitate roadway segments, but rather aim to apply various seal coats. Attachment 2 identifies the boundaries of each area. They are not prioritized in any order.

Community Investment Program
This program is focused on rehabilitating the City's major arterials and collectors. Roadways selected for this program vary depending on the funding level approved by City Council. The general methodology for selection of roadway segments is their proximity to economic drivers, grant eligibility, and traffic volumes. An example of this program is the Port Area Infrastructure and Complete Streets Project. Another example is the Arterial Streets Pavement Repair Project. The Port Area Infrastructure and Complete Streets Project goal is to completely rehabilitate the roadway’s pavement while adding Complete Streets elements to the facility. On the other hand, the Arterial Streets Pavement Repair Project aims to provide major “dig-out” repairs to limited areas of an arterial roadway that are experiencing major pavement failure. Southport Parkway between Lake Washington Blvd and Ramco Street is an example of where this type of funding will be used. It provides a major “bandaid” until the roadway can receive overall rehabilitation.

ANALYSIS
This project will combine four projects (CIPs 17021, 17023, 17024& 17026) in one construction contract. CIPs 17023, 17024 & 17026 are for two areas of the Neighborhood Pavement Preservation Program as described earlier in this report, areas I & J of the Neighborhood Pavement Preservation Program Map (see Attachment 2).

The Pavement Preservation Program scope is to preserve local residential roadway pavement. The work generally includes removal of existing traffic stripes, markings and markers, and the installation of Type II Slurry Seal, Cape Seal, or Type III Micro surface, thermoplastic pavement striping markings and markers, and potential replacement of signs on existing or new posts.

CIP 17021 is the current Arterial Street Pavement Repair project and will concentrate its efforts to repairing the worst areas of Southport Parkway between Lake Washington Blvd and Ramco Street as well as Jefferson Ave south of its intersection with Lake Washington Blvd to Davis Road. The work will include removal of existing traffic stripes markings and markers, milling and potential dig-out of pavement and placement of hot mix asphalt (HMA), Type II Slurry Seal, re-striping, and thermoplastic pavement markings and markers.

On February 22, 2023, staff solicited proposals for construction management services with a RFP through an online procurement system, OpenGov Procurement. On March 3, Addendum #1 was published, extending the submission deadline to March 13, 2023. This extension was provided to encourage more applicants to submit 22 Professional Services Contract with 4LEAF Inc
April 19, 2023

proposals. In addition to Addendum #1, The City also provided outreach to firms who followed the project on the procurement system. On March 13, 2023 The City received one proposal from the following firm:

1. 4LEAF Inc.

A three (3) person evaluation panel ranked and invited the one firm for an interview on March 21, 2023. City staff evaluated the firm and their proposal based on the following criteria: qualifications and experience, understanding of the work to be done, demonstrated technical abiliy, technical approach, and acceptance of the City’s contract for services. After reviewing 4LEAF, Inc. qualifications, experience, and proposed work plan, the staff selection panel determined that 4LEAF, Inc. has a strong understanding of the work to be performed and is qualified to provide the required construction management services. The attached contract includes the negotiated scope and fees to complete the assignment.

A summary of the professional services with 4LEAF, Inc. is included as Exhibit A of the contract attachment.

Environmental Considerations
Staff has determined that the appropriate level of environmental review for this project is a Categorical Exemption as identified under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15301 Class 1 (b) of the California Environmental Quality Act. This project is a rehabilitation and/or maintenance of the roadway facility involving no expansion of use beyond the existing. A Notice of Exemption is being filed with the Yolo County for this project.

Commission Recommendation
Not applicable
Strategic Plan Integration
This project carries out a top priority of the 2019 Strategic Plan Management Agenda: Pavement Management Plan Implementation.

Alternatives
Following are the City Council’s primary action alternatives:
1) Approve the recommended actions as stated above.
2) Modify or defer the recommended actions.
3) Elect not to proceed with the contract for professional services with 4LEAF, Inc. or cancel the project.

Alternative 1 is recommended to facilitate the constructability review in a timely manner and to meet the overall project schedule.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Capital Projects Department in coordination with and review bythe Public Works Operations and Maintenance Department and the Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
This project is included in the City’s current Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as CIPs 17021, 17023, 17024, and 17026. There is sufficient funding available in the project budget for the requested actions. No additional funds are required or requested for this contract at this time.

ATTACHMENT(S)
1) Professional Services Contract with 4LEAF, Inc.
2) Neighborhood Pavement Preservation Program Map
23 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
THIS CONTRACT is made on April 19, 2023, by and between the CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (“City”), and 4LEAF, Inc (“Consultant”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the City desires to retain 4LEAF, Inc for construction management services to facilitate construction of the Neighborhood Pavement Preservation & Arterial Streets Pavement Repair Project.

WHEREAS, the Consultant has presented a proposal for such services to the City, dated March 13, 2023, (attached hereto as Exhibit “A”) and is duly licensed, qualified and experienced to perform those services;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES:

A. Consultant shall do all work, attend all meetings, produce all reports and carry out all activities necessary to completion of the services described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit “A”. This Contract and its exhibits shall be known as the “Contract Documents.” Terms set forth in any Contract Document shall be deemed to be incorporated in all Contract Documents as if set forth in full therein. In the event of conflict between terms contained in these Contract Documents, the more specific term shall control. If any portion of the Contract Documents shall be in conflict with any other portion, provisions contained in the Contract shall govern over conflicting provisions contained in the exhibits to the Contract.

B. Consultant enters into this Contract as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City. The Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Contract to bind the City in any respect. Nothing in this Contract shall be construed to be inconsistent with this relationship or status. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by the Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of the Consultant and not of the City. The City shall not be obligated in any way to pay any wage claims or other claims made against Consultant by any such employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, or any other person resulting from performance of this Contract.

C. The Consultant agrees it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

2. TERM OF CONTRACT
A. The services of Consultant are to commence upon receipt of written notice to proceed from the City, and shall be undertaken and completed in accordance with the Schedule of Performance attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit “B” and terminate on December 31, 2024.
4Leaf, Inc.

CP23-079 Neighborhood Pavement Preservation
Expires 12/31/24
24 Contract for Services
4LEAF, Inc
April 19, 2023
2 B. Consultant’s failure to complete work in accordance with the Schedule of Performance may result in delayed compensation as described in Section 3.

C. The City Manager or his or her designee may, by written instrument signed by the Parties, extend the duration of this Contract for a period of one (1) year in the manner provided in Section 5, provided that the extension does not require the payment of compensation in excess of the maximum compensation set forth in Section 3, Compensation.

3. COMPENSATION:

A. The Consultant shall be paid monthly for the actual fees, costs and expenses for all time and materials required and expended, but in no event shall total compensation exceed $202,379.40, without City’s prior written approval. Consultant's fees shall be as specified in the Schedule of Fees, which is attached hereto an incorporated herein as Exhibit “C”.

B. Said amount shall be paid upon submittal of a monthly billing showing completion of the tasks that month. Consultant shall furnish City with invoices for all expenses as well as for all materials authorized by this Contract. The invoices shall be submitted with the monthly billings.

If Consultant’s performance is not in conformity with the Schedule of Performance, payments may be delayed or denied, unless the Consultant’s failure to perform in conformity with the Schedule of Performance is a documented result of the City’s failure to conform with the Schedule of Performance, or if the Schedule of Performance is extended pursuant to Section 5.

C. If the work is halted at the request of the City, compensation shall be based upon the proportion that the work performed bears to the total work required by this Contract, subject to Section 4.

4. TERMINATION:

A. This Contract may be terminated by either party, provided that the other party is given not less than 5 calendar days’ written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate.

B. The City may temporarily suspend this Contract, at no additional cost to City, provided that the Consultant is given written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of temporary suspension. If City gives such notice of temporary suspension, Consultant shall immediately suspend its activities under this Contract.

C. Notwithstanding any provisions of this Contract, Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this Contract by Consultant, and the City may withhold any payments due to Consultant until such time as the exact amount of damages, if any, due the City from Consultant is determined.

D. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be compensated as provided for in this Contract, except as provided in Section 4C. Upon termination, the City shall be entitled to all work, including but not limited to, appraisals, inventories, studies, analyses, drawings and data estimates performed to that date in accordance with Section 7 hereof.

5. AMENDMENTS, CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS:
25 Contract for Services
4LEAF, Inc
April 19, 2023
3 Amendments, changes or modifications in the terms of this Contract may be made at any time by mutual written agreement between the parties hereto and shall be signed by the persons authorized to bind the parties hereto.

6. EXTENSIONS OF TIME:

Consultant may, for good cause, request extensions of time to perform the services required hereunder. Such extensions shall be authorized in advance by the City in writing and shall be incorporated in written amendments to this Contract or the attached Work Program in the manner provided in Section 5.

7. PROPERTY OF CITY:

A. It is mutually agreed that all materials prepared by the Consultant under this Contract shall become the property of the City, and the Consultant shall have no property right therein whatsoever. Immediately upon termination, the City shall be entitled to, and the Consultant shall deliver to the City, all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and other such materials as may have been prepared or accumulated to date by the Consultant in performing this Contract which is not Consultant’s privileged information, as defined by law, or Consultant’s personnel information, along with all other property belonging exclusively to the City which is in the Consultant’s possession.

B. Additionally, it is agreed that the parties intend this to be a contract for services and each considers the products and results of the services to be rendered by Consultant hereunder (the “Work”) to be a work made for hire. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that the Work (and all rights therein, including, without limitation, copyright) belongs to and shall be the sole and exclusive property of the City. The reuse of any of the materials or documents described in Paragraph 7.A by the City on any other project without the written permission of the Consultant, shall be at the City's sole risk and the City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Consultant from all claims, damages and expenses, including attorney's fees, arising out of such unauthorized reuse by the City or by others acting through the City. The Consultant is not responsible and liability is waived by the City as against the Consultant for use by the City or any other person of any data, reports, plans or drawings not signed by the Consultant.

8. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS:

A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of federal, State and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Contract. It shall be City’s responsibility to obtain all rights of way and easements to enable Consultant to perform its services hereunder.

Consultant shall assist City in providing the same.

B. Consultant warrants to the City that it is licensed by all applicable governmental bodies to perform this Contract and will remain so licensed throughout the progress of the Work, and that it has, and will have, throughout the progress of the Work, the necessary experience, skill and financial resources to enable it to perform this Contract. 26 Contract for Services
4LEAF, Inc
April 19, 2023
4 C. The work contemplated under this Contract is a public work for the purposes of Labor Code section 1720, and is subject to the payment of prevailing wages. Accordingly, Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Exhibit "D".

9. WARRANTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES - CONSULTANT:

A. Consultant agrees and represents that it is qualified to properly provide the services set forth in Exhibit “A” in a manner which is consistent with the generally accepted standards of Consultant’s profession.

B. Consultant agrees and represents that the work performed under this Contract shall be in accordance with applicable federal, State and local law in accordance with Section 17A hereof.

C. Consultant shall designate a project manager who at all times shall represent the Consultant before the City on all matters relating to this Contract. The project manager shall continue in such capacity unless and until he or she is removed at the request of the City, is no longer employed by Consultant, or is replaced with the written approval of the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.

D. Consultant shall provide corrective services without charge to the City for services which fail to meet the above professional and legal standards and which are reported to Consultant in writing within sixty (60) days of discovery. Should Consultant fail or refuse to perform promptly its obligations, the City may render or undertake performance thereof and the Consultant shall be liable for any expenses thereby incurred.

10. SUBCONTRACTING:

None of the services covered by this Contract shall be subcontracted without the prior written consent of the City, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Consultant shall be as fully responsible to the City for the negligent acts and omissions of its contractors and subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as it is for the negligent acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Consultant.

11. ASSIGNABILITY:

Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Contract whether by assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of the City which will not be unreasonably withheld.

However, claims for money due or to become due Consultant from the City under this Contract may be assigned to a financial institution, or to a trustee in bankruptcy, without such approval.

Notice of any assignment or transfer whether voluntary or involuntary shall be furnished promptly to the City.

12. INTEREST IN CONTRACT:

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any of its employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the subject of the Contract, nor any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of its services hereunder. Consultant shall make all disclosures required by the City’s conflict of interest code in accordance with the category designated by the City, unless the 27 Contract for Services
4LEAF, Inc
April 19, 2023
5 City Manager determines in writing that Consultant’s duties are more limited in scope than is warranted by the category designated by the City code and that a narrower disclosure category should apply. Consultant also agrees to make disclosure in compliance with the City conflict of interest code if, at any time after the execution of this Contract, City determines and notifies Consultant in writing that Consultant’s duties under this Contract warrant greater disclosure by Consultant than was originally contemplated. Consultant shall make disclosures in the time, place and manner set forth in the conflict of interest code and as directed by the City.

13. MATERIALS CONFIDENTIAL:

All of the materials prepared or assembled by Consultant pursuant to performance of this Contract are confidential and Consultant agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City, except by court order.

14. LIABILITY OF CONSULTANT-NEGLIGENCE:

Consultant shall be responsible for performing the work under this Contract in a manner which is consistent with the generally-accepted standards of the Consultant’s profession and shall be liable for its own negligence and the negligent acts of its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors. The City shall have no right of control over the manner in which the work is to be done but only as to its outcome, and shall not be charged with the responsibility of preventing risk to Consultant or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors.

15. INDEMNITY AND LITIGATION COSTS:

Consultant shall protect, hold free and harmless, defend and indemnify the City, its consultants, and each of their officers, employees and agents, from any and all liability, penalties, costs, losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims or judgments, including attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its employees or anyone else employed by the Consultant in the performance of professional design services under this agreement, to the extent of the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

To the extent permitted by Civil Code section 2782.8, for all other claims unrelated to the provision of professional design services, the Consultant shall protect, hold free and harmless, defend and indemnify the City, its consultants, and each of their officers, employees and agents, from any and all liability, penalties, costs, losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims or judgments, including attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation, which arise out of or are in any way connected with the Consultant’s, or its subcontractors’ or suppliers’, performance under this agreement or failure to comply with any of the obligations contained in the agreement. This indemnity shall imply no reciprocal right of the Consultant in any action on the agreement pursuant to California Civil Code section 1717 or section 1717.5. To the fullest extent legally permissible, this indemnity, defense and hold harmless agreement by the Consultant shall apply to any and all acts or omissions unrelated to the provision of professional design services, whether active or passive, on the part of the Consultant or its agents, employees, representatives, or subcontractor’s agents, employees and representatives, resulting in claim or liability, irrespective of whether or not any acts or omissions of the parties to be indemnified hereunder may also have been a contributing factor to the liability, except such loss or damage which was caused by the active negligence, the sole negligence, or the willful misconduct of the City. 28 Contract for Services
4LEAF, Inc
April 19, 2023
6 16. CONSULTANT TO PROVIDE INSURANCE:

A. Consultant shall not commence any work before obtaining, and shall maintain in force at all times during the duration and performance of this Contract, the policies of insurance specified in this Section. Such insurance must have the approval of the City as to limit, form, and amount, and shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A VII (an NR rating is acceptable for Worker’s Compensation insurance written with the State Compensation Insurance Fund of California).

B. Prior to execution of this Contract and prior to commencement of any work, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and copies of endorsements providing evidence of coverage for all policies required by the Contract. The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall, at their expense, maintain in effect at all times during the performance of work under the Contract not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policy satisfactory to the City. The maintenance by Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors of the following coverage and limits of insurance is a material element of this Contract. The failure of Consultant or of any of its contractors or subcontractors to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of this Contract. Approval of the insurance by the City shall not relieve or decrease any liability of Consultant.

1. Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance

a. Worker’s Compensation - Insurance to protect the Consultant, its contractors and subcontractors from all claims under Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Acts, including Longshoremen’s and Harbor Worker’s Act (“Acts”), if applicable. Such coverage shall be maintained, in type and amount, in strict compliance with all applicable state and Federal statutes and regulations.

The Consultant shall execute a certificate in compliance with Labor Code Section 1861, on the form provided in the Contract Documents.
b. Consultant shall provide a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant.

2. Commercial General Liability Insurance
a. The insurance shall be provided on form CG0001, or its equivalent, and shall include coverage for claims for bodily injury or property damage arising out of premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual liability, and subconsultant’s work and personal and advertising injury resulting from actions, failures to act, or operations of the insured, or by its employees or agents, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the insured. The amount of insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general and products/completed operations aggregates. b. The commercial general liability insurance shall also include the following:
29 Contract for Services
4LEAF, Inc
April 19, 2023
7 i. Endorsement equivalent to CG 2010 0714 naming the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds. The endorsement shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
ii. Endorsement stating insurance provided to the City shall be primary as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it, to the payment or satisfaction of any defense expenses, loss, or judgment.
iii. Provision or endorsement stating that the Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

3. Commercial Automobile Insurance
a. The insurance shall include, but shall not be limited to, coverage for claims for bodily injury or property damage for owned, non-owned, and hired automobiles resulting from actions, failures to act, or operations of the insured, or by its employees or agents, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the insured. The amount of insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per accident.
b. The commercial automobile insurance shall include the same endorsements required for the commercial general liability policy (see Section

16.B.2.b).

4. Professional Liability. The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall secure and maintain in full force, during the term of this Contract and for five years thereafter, professional liability insurance policies appropriate to the respective professions and the work to be performed as specified in this Contract. The limits of such professional liability insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per claim.

C. In addition to any other remedy the City may have, if Consultant fails to maintain the insurance coverage as required in this Section, the City may obtain such insurance coverage as is not being maintained, in form and amount substantially the same as is required herein, and the City may deduct the cost of such insurance from any amounts due or which may become due Consultant under this Contract.

D. No policy required by this Contract shall be suspended, cancelled, terminated by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits unless Consultant has provided thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City. 30 Contract for Services
4LEAF, Inc
April 19, 2023
8 E. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions in excess of $10,000 must be declared to, and approved by, the City.

F. The requirement as to types, limits, and the City’s approval of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant are not intended to, and shall not in any manner, limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations assumed by Consultant under the Contract.

17. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS:

A. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of, shall observe and comply with, and shall cause any and all persons, firms or corporations employed by it or under its control to observe and comply with, applicable federal, state, county and municipal laws, ordinances, regulations, orders and decrees which in any manner affect those engaged or employed on the work described by this Contract or the materials used or which in any way affect the conduct of the work.

B. Consultant shall not engage in unlawful employment discrimination. Such unlawful employment discrimination includes, but is not limited to, employment discrimination based upon a person’s race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, gender, citizenship, or sexual orientation.

C. Consultant shall maintain and make available for inspection by the City and its auditors accurate records of all of its costs, disbursements and receipts with respect to any work under this Contract. Such inspections may be made during regular office hours at any time until six (6) months after the final payments under this Contract are made to the Consultant.

D. This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relative to the services specified herein and no modification hereof shall be effective unless and until such modification is evidenced by a writing signed by both parties to this Contract. There are no understandings, agreements, conditions, representations, warranties or promises, with respect to this Contract, except those contained in or referred to in the writing.

E. All notices that are required to be given by one party to the other under this Contract shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if delivered personally or enclosed in a properly addressed envelope and deposited in a United States Post Office for delivery by registered or certified mail addressed to the parties at the following addresses:

City: City of West Sacramento
Capital Projects Department
Attn: Ryan Teves
1110 West Capitol Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691

Consultant: 4LEAF, Inc
Attn: Mr. Bert Gross
8896 N. Winding Way,
Fair Oaks, CA, 95628

31 Contract for Services
4LEAF, Inc
April 19, 2023
9 F. This Contract shall be interpreted and governed by the laws of the State of California.

G. Any action arising out of this Contract shall be brought and maintained in Yolo County California, regardless of where else venue may lie.

H. In any action brought by either party to enforce the terms of this Contract, each party shall be bear responsibility for its attorney’s fees and all costs regardless of whether one party is determined to be the prevailing party.
32 Contract for Services
4LEAF, Inc
April 19, 2023
10 CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
By: __________________________
Aaron Laurel, City Manager
ATTEST:

By: _________________________________
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: __________________________________
Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney
4LEAF, Inc
By: _________________________
Bert Gross, P.E.

Vice President, 4LEAF, Inc
Date Executed: _________________
33 EXHIBIT A
Consultant Proposal/Scope of Work
34 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

SERVICES
FOR
23-005-RFP NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT

PRESERVATION PROGRAM
&

ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
1110 W, CAPITOL AVE.

WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 95691
ATTN: CHRISTIAN ASUNCION
MARCH 13, 2023
SUBMITTED BY:
35 Engineering • Construction Management • Inspection • Plan Check City of West Sacramento Page 1 of 21
Transmittal Letter March 13, 2023
SECTION 1 TRANSMITTAL LETTER
March 13, 2023
City of West Sacramento
1110 West Capitol Avenue,
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Attn: Christian Asuncion, Associate Civil Engineer
Subject: Proposal to Provide Construction Management Services for the Neighborhood Pavement Program & Arterial Street Pavement Repair Project Dear Christian,
We appreciate the chance to present our proposal to provide Construction Management and Inspection Services to the City of West Sacramento. We value our association with the City and the experience we have gained working on previous City projects. We were the CM firm for the keynote Tower Bridge Gateway and West Capitol Avenue Streetscape several years back, as well as providing inspectors on several smaller On Call projects more recently. Our proposed inspector, Ted Karnegas, worked for many years in the City prior to joining 4LEAF, and has a depth of City project experience. We believe our 4LEAF is a great match for the City’s needs.

Why 4LEAF?
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Our experience includes CM/Inspection on a number of City pavement programs covering numerous residential and commercial streets. Our staff is extremely familiar with the various pavement methods including slurry and cape seal, as well as thermoplastic striping and pavement markings and markers.

QUALIFIED TEAM 4LEAF has assembled a team with deep experience on City projects. Our proposed CM/RE is Roger Gross, CCM, a certified construction manager with more than 25 years of experience and several keynote projects in his track record. He has served on public works projects for Sacramento Regional Transit, California State Parks, and municipalities including Sacramento, Folsom and Roseville.

He has a thorough understanding of local street construction, traffic signals, traffic control and underground construction. Inspector
CITY EXPERIENCE 4LEAF has worked on many projects with the City, going back more than 15 years. We have served as one of your On Call CM/Inspection Firms, and have been repeatedly selected for staff augmentation needs; and we provide building inspections and fire plan review for your Building Division.

We understand City procedures and protocols.

RFP 3.2 A 4LEAF’s point of contact for this proposal is:

Mr. Bert Gross, P.E.

Vice President, 4LEAF, Inc.
8896 N. Winding Way, Fair Oaks, CA 95628
Office: (916) 965-0010, Fax: (916) 965-0013, Mobile: (916) 870-7191 Email: [email protected]
36 Engineering • Construction Management • Inspection • Plan Check City of West Sacramento Page 2 of 21
Transmittal Letter March 13, 2023
RFP 3.2 B
RFP 3.2 C
RFP 3.2 D
RFP 3.2 E
RFP 3.2 F
This proposal is an offer to complete the RFP scope of work. Our proposal will remain valid for 90 working days after the deadline for receipt of the proposals by the City of West Sacramento and thereafter in accordance with any resulting contract between 4LEAF and the City of West Sacramento. 4LEAF, or any individual who shall perform work under the contract, has no conflict of interest with the City of West Sacramento according to our knowledge. 4LEAF acknowledges that the City’s Standard Contract included in the RFP has been reviewed and accepted without any reservations or qualifications.

Our team includes subconsultant firms for as needed services:

Construction Testing Services, Inc.
4400 Yankee Hill Rd., Rocklin CA 95677 / [email protected] / (916) 419-4747 Tully Consulting Group to provide SWPPP/QSP services
1650 N. Lincoln St., Suite A Dixon, CA 95620 / [email protected] / (707)693-1926 Silveira Consulting to provide Labor Compliance services 908 C St Ste F, Galt, CA 95632 / [email protected] / (209)663-6523 This letter is signed by Kevin Duggan, the company president with authority to bind 4LEAF to the provisions of this RFQ and any contract awarded pursuant to it.

We acknowledge receipt of RFP Addendum 1 on 3/3/2023.

Again, thank you for this opportunity to present our qualifications. We believe 4LEAF can make a positive difference in the quality of your projects at the City of West Sacramento. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me or Bert Gross.

Respectively submitted,
Kevin Duggan
President, 4LEAF, Inc.
2126 Rheem Dr.

Pleasanton, CA 94588 / (925) 462-5959
37 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 3 of 21
B. Mandatory Qualifications and Experience March 13, 2023

SECTION B MANDATORY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
A. ORGANIZATION
4LEAF, Inc. is a multi-discipline engineering firm specializing in providing Engineering, Construction Management, Inspection, and Plan Review Services. Founded in California in 1999, 4LEAF has provided engineering and construction services for the past 21 years. 4LEAF currently has more than 300 employees on staff, with main offices in Pleasanton and Fair Oaks. It is a diverse team that includes experienced California Registered Civil Engineers, construction managers and certified inspectors with wide ranging project experience. 4LEAF has managed and inspected numerous public works projects for municipalities and public agencies. Our team understands the Caltrans Standard Plans, Specifications, and Local Assistance Procedures Manual, as well as the requirements related to construction with federal aid on the state highway system. We understand the DOT documentation requirements and have participated in State and Federal audits.

We will serve this contract from our Fair Oaks office at nearby 8896 North Winding Way, Fair Oaks. 4LEAF has a proven track record of having quality personnel readily available to deploy on City projects.

OUR CLIENTS
4LEAF has been providing Construction Management, Inspection, and code compliance services to public agencies including the following clients (partial list):

B. EXPERIENCE
4LEAF has more than 22 years of experience performing Construction Management, Inspection and Testing Services for clients on projects supported by Federal, State and Local funds. 4LEAF’s client base includes numerous local municipalities, including West Sacramento, Sacramento, Folsom, Roseville, Rancho Cordova and Rocklin and Lincoln, among others.

We also serve public agencies on On-Call CM/Inspection contracts, including SMUD, UC Davis Health, Sacramento Regional Transit District, and California State Parks, among others. ▪ City of West Sacramento
▪ City of Sacramento
▪ City of Citrus Heights
▪ City of Folsom
▪ City of Lincoln
▪ City of Elk Grove
▪ Sac Regional Transit
▪ California State Parks
▪ City of Cotati
▪ City of Rocklin
▪ City of Placerville
▪ City of Colfax
▪ Town of Truckee
▪ City of Stockton
▪ UC Berkeley
▪ UC Merced
▪ UC Davis
▪ County of San Joaquin
▪ City/County of San Francisco
▪ City of Petaluma
▪ City of Milpitas
▪ City of Palo Alto
▪ Air Force Center for Eng.
▪ City of Roseville
▪ City of Galt
▪ City of Pittsburgh
▪ City of Brentwood
▪ City of Avenal
▪ City of San Mateo
▪ County of Santa Clara
▪ Tuolumne County
▪ San Jose State University
▪ Marin Community College
▪ City of Dublin
▪ City of Lathrop
▪ City of Berkeley
▪ City of Pleasanton
▪ City of Vallejo
▪ City of Sunnyvale
▪ City of Walnut Creek
▪ City of Santa Clara
▪ CSU East Bay
▪ City of Tracy
▪ City of Lafayette
▪ City of Hillsborough
▪ City of Manteca
▪ City of Orland
38 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 4 of 21
B. Mandatory Qualifications and Experience March 13, 2023

PAVING / OVERLAY EXPERIENCE
4LEAF is an excellent choice to provide Construction Management services for your street resurfacing project. We have performed on numerous roadway paving projects including municipal CIP pavement repair programs similar to your project. Several examples are cited below:

City of Cotati – 2023 Citywide Pavement Maintenance Project Phase II (10/2022) 4LEAF recently completed CM and Inspection Services for this street maintenance project that consisted of dig-outs, crack sealing, and slurry seal treatments as well as pavement striping and signing. The project covered approximately 5.4 total miles of streets that were in medium to good condition with the goal of preserving the streets for years to come.

City of Gilroy - 2019 Citywide Pavement Maintenance Project Phase II (8/2019) 4LEAF provided CM and Inspection Services for this $1.3M Citywide Pavement Maintenance Project.

Improvements included localized asphalt and concrete repair, micro-surfacing, crack sealing, and pavement striping improvements for multiple streets throughout the City.

City of Cotati - Old Redwood Highway South Rehabilitation Project – (1/2017) 4LEAF provided CM and Inspection services on this project that rehabilitates the roadway and adds pedestrian features. The scope included roadway slurry sealing, edge and conform grinding, repaving, roadway repair, replacement of pavement marking and signal detection devices.

City of Los Altos - 2018 Street Resurfacing Project (2018) The project included AC overlay and pavement rehabilitation using various methods of more than 50 streets in both residential and business areas throughout the City.

Town of Danville - Pavement Management Program (2017)
The program included the removal and replacement of AC pavement at more than 100 locations throughout the City from full street repaves to isolated dig outs. The program also included concrete flatwork, replacements, raising 300 castings to grade, restriping, and traffic control.

City of Hayward - 2016 Pavement Improvement Project
4LEAF performed inspections that included AC overlay and pavement rehabilitation using various methods for 100 residential roadways throughout the City. Construction value was more than $14M and included concrete flatwork to update sidewalks and 300 curb ramps to current ADA standards.

City of Lafayette - Capital Improvement Program Inspections (2016) 4LEAF performed inspection of paving fabric installation, asphalt concrete overlay/inlay, asphalt concrete reconstruction, milling, grinding, AC dike installation storm drain replacement; and striping for the City’s annual CIP and street rehabilitation program.

City of Elk Grove - Pavement Overlay Project (2016)
The project installed asphalt concrete overlay along several streets throughout the City. The Project also replaced curb ramps necessary to meet current ADA requirements.

City of Vallejo - On Call Public Works Inspections
4LEAF provided Inspection services to the Public Works Department in support of various City projects including numerous curb and gutter installation projects, the Mare Island Asphalt Overlay Project, city slurry seal projects, and numerous ADA handicap ramps.

City of Walnut Creek - Pavement Improvement Projects
4LEAF provided Inspection services for the City of Walnut Creek on paving projects along San Juan Avenue and Buena Vista Road. Projects included excavation, grading and new HMA pavement overlay. 39 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 5 of 21
B. Mandatory Qualifications and Experience March 13, 2023 C. PUBLIC AGENCY EXPERIENCE
Below is a partial list of 4LEAF’s relevant roadway/public works projects where we provided Construction Management and/or Inspection services for public sector clients. • SMUD Upper American River 4 Mile Bike Trail (in progress) • San Marcos Creek District Project, City of San Marcos (Roads, Bridges, Levees) $62M, (in progress) • South Willows Commercial and Industrial Center, City of Willows EDS/CDBG funded $3.5M (2020) • Clearlake Oaks Safe Routes to School Project, Lake County, CDBG funded $5.5M (Oct. 2018) • Lincoln Boulevard Improvements, Phase 1, 1A, and 2, City of Lincoln, $5M, (2019) • SR89 UPRR Mousehole Undercrossing Bike Trail, Town of Truckee, $13M (April 2016) • City of Colfax UPRR/Pedestrian Improvements, $600K, (Fall 2015) • California Dept of Parks & Rec - Chino Hills State Park 2.5 Mile Entrance Road, $12.5M (June 2015) • PG&E Gas Line Replacement, City of West Sacramento (2014) • Auburn Boulevard Complete Streets, City of Citrus Heights, $10M (2015) • Miller Avenue Streetscape, City of Mill Valley (2017) • Old Redwood Highway Rehab and Downtown Area Street Plan (Spring 2017) • City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation Project, City of Hayward, (Fall 2016) • Water Treatment Plant Projects, City of Folsom (January 2016) • UPRR Pedestrian Improvements, City of Colfax, $300K (November 2015) • Tower Bridge Gateway East, City of West Sacramento $6M (completed 2012) • West Capitol Avenue Streetscape, City of West Sacramento, $7M (completed 2010) • I-215 Airport Interchange/Bridge, Clark County Public Works, Nevada, $34M (2013) • San Francisco Marina Yacht Harbor – America’s Cup Renovation, $22M (2013) • Desert Inn Super Arterial Deck, Las Vegas Blvd, Clark County, Nevada, $3.8M (August 2011) • Cactus Avenue / UPRR Grade Separation, Clark County, NV, $8.5M (2014)

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO EXPERIENCE
4LEAF has enjoyed a working relationship with the City since 2007. During this time, we worked on the Tower Bridge Gateway, both East and West Phases, West Capitol Avenue Streetscape, solar Installation, PG&E Gas Line replacement, and other staff augmentation projects.

Listed below are our current contractual relationships with the City of West Sacramento and all those completed within the previous five (5) year period:
◼ Building Department Building Inspection and Plan Review - 4/2022 ◼ Public Works Construction Inspection Staff Augmentation Services 2019, Amend #1 Riverwalk Parkway Project
West Capitol Ave Streetscape
40 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 6 of 21
B. Mandatory Qualifications and Experience March 13, 2023

PUBLIC SECTOR PROJECTS
2023 Street Preservation Project
City of Cotati – Construction Management & Inspection Services Client Reference: Craig Scott, Public Works Dir./City Engineer Proposed Staff:

Client Address: 201 West Sierra Ave., Cotati, CA 94931 Bert Gross, PE – PIC Client Telephone: (707) 665-3620, Email: [email protected] Roger Gross, PM 4LEAF provided Construction Management and Inspection services on the project for this street maintenance project on behalf of the City of Cotati, similar to the program at West Sacramento.

The project consists of approximately 1.1 centerline miles of Full Depth Reclamation and 0.4 centerline miles of slurry seal and 9 curb ramps.

Project scope consisted of clearing and grubbing, dig-outs, crack sealing, and slurry seal treatments as well as pavement striping and signing. Work includes temporary traffic control, notification of adjacent property owners, among other tasks. The project covered approximately 5.4 total miles of streets that were in medium to good condition with the goal of preserving the streets for years to come. 2020 Street Resurfacing Project (2020)
City of Los Altos – Construction Inspection Services
Client Reference: Gaku Watanabe, Project Manager
Client Address: 1 North San Antonio Road, Los Altos, CA 94022 Client Telephone: (650) 947-2628 / [email protected] 4LEAF provided Construction Inspection services for the City on multiple streets as part of the City’s 2018 and 2020 Annual Paving and Slurry Seal Project. The project’s scope of work included asphalt concrete (AC) pavement repairs including deep lift asphalt concrete pavement repairs (cut & plug), pavement milling and overlay, crack sealing and micro-surfacing, asphalt overlay on existing pavement, traffic control, miscellaneous re-striping, installation of loop detectors, adjustment of utility covers, sidewalk and curb ramp upgrades, bike lanes, miscellaneous re-striping, installation of loop detectors, adjustment of utility covers, and other improvements. The projects were performed on more than 50 streets in both residential and business areas throughout the City.
2019 Citywide Pavement Maintenance Project – Phase II
Client Name: City of Gilroy
Client Reference: Nirorn Than, Engineer 1
Client Address: 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, CA
Client Telephone: (408) 846-0293 / [email protected] 4LEAF provided CM and Inspection Services for this $1.3M Citywide Pavement Maintenance Project.

That included localized asphalt and concrete repair, micro-surfacing, crack sealing, and pavement striping improvements for multiple streets throughout the City; upgrading and / or replacing 20 curb ramps to meet ADA compliance; sidewalk repairs; and utility adjustments. Scope included providing daily inspections, monitoring and documenting the contractor’s work for adherence to contract plans and specifications, continually monitoring contractor’s traffic control to comply with the traffic control plan, providing accurate measured quantities and reviewing pay estimates submitted by contractor, providing outreach to affected residents. 41 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 7 of 21
B. Mandatory Qualifications and Experience March 13, 2023

PUBLIC SECTOR PROJECTS
On Call Construction Management Services – California State Parks California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR)
Client Reference:

CA Dept. of Parks & Rec
One Capitol Mall, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95817
Kathy Amann, Deputy Dir
(916) 477-0239
[email protected]
Dates: 2006-present.
4LEAF Staff:

Bert Gross, PIC
Roger Gross – PM
Ted Karnegas - Inspector
4LEAF provides On Call Project Management,
Construction Management and Inspection Services
for California State Parks. We are DPR’s sole
consultant providing these services, covering all
their construction and public works projects Statewide, over 400 projects over the last 15 years. 4LEAF has been repeatedly selected for consecutive
contract terms.

We provide onsite construction management and
inspection services on relevant projects including
roadways, trails, bikeways,
bridges, utility installations, drainage systems, and park facilities.

Project Challenges: This is a statewide contract, and 4LEAF must be ready to deploy qualified inspectors across a wide geographic area, on short notice. Projects are in remote areas, often out of cell phone range, and difficult to access.

SMUD – On Call Construction Inspection Services
Sacramento Metropolitan Utility District
4LEAF currently provides On-call professional
construction Inspection Services for the Sacramento
Municipal Utility District serving on Public Works, facility, civil and telecommunication projects.

We provide inspectors on a variety of SMUD projects,
including underground utility and street repair projects central downtown area.

We also support projects at the SMUD Upper
American River Project including a current bike
trail project at the Crystal Basin area at Union
Valley Reservoir. This 12-mile paved trail includes
three bridge crossings, elevated boardwalks and
rockery retaining walls. We are also inspecting
road reconstruction, storm damage repairs, and
erosion control, and drainage projects at the
Upper American River Project.

CLIENT CONTACT:

Sacramento Municipal
Utility District
4401 Bradshaw Rd.

Sacramento, CA 95827
David Irby, CMI Supervisor
916-997-5158 Cell
[email protected]
Dates: 2006-present.
4LEAF Staff:

Bert Gross, PE Principal
Roger Gross, PM
Mount Diablo State Park
Road Safety Improvements
42 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 8 of 21
B. Mandatory Qualifications and Experience March 13, 2023

PUBLIC SECTOR PROJECTS
McKinley Park Water Vault ($40M) 2021
City of Sacramento Department of Utilities
Client Name: City of Sacramento Department of Utilities Client Reference: James Yorita, P. E. Associate Engineer Client Address: 1395 35th Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95823
Client Telephone: (916) 291-9690 / [email protected]

4LEAF recently provided full Construction Management Services for this keynote project in the final stages in midtown Sacramento. The project involves the City’s Combined Sewer System (CSS) which can exceed system capacity during storms, putting low-lying streets at risk.

The project constructs an off-line, 6 million-gallon, underground cast-inplace concrete wastewater storage facility to address the overflow issue and hold combined storm water
and wastewater during
storms when the combined
sewer system is at capacity.

The new storage vault will include an effluent return pump station, odor control structure, valve vault, and diversion structure. Additional improvements include new park amenities and landscaping, and jogging path improvements. Recent storms tested the functionality of the water vault, which performed as designed.

Old Redwood Highway Rehab / Downtown Plan Area Pedestrian Improvements City of Cotati – Department of Public Works
Client Name: City of Cotati Proposed Staff:

Client Reference: Craig Scott, Public Works Dir./City Engineer Bert Gross, PE – PIC Client Address: 201 West Sierra Ave., Cotati, CA 94931
Client Telephone: (707) 665-3620, Email: [email protected] 4LEAF, led by proposed CM Jim Ewertsen, provided Construction Management and Inspection services on the project that continues the Phase 1 pavement rehabilitation in the downtown project area. The project improved the regional bicycle route on Old Redwood Highway, widens and improves the sidewalks, adding new streetscape in downtown Cotati's Priority Development Area (PDA).

The project scope included ADA upgrades, signalization of deficient intersection, improved sidewalks, crosswalks, and bike lanes; made intersection improvements; and installed streetlights and other amenities. The project was federally funded and managed in accordance with Caltrans LAPM procedures. The site was in the old downtown portion of Cotati, which is a two lane portion of the Old Redwood Highway and a very cramped space, which constrained the work. Located in the heart of the downtown area, the project impacted access to many businesses. Jim maintained communication with business owners throughout the project.
43 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 9 of 21
B. Mandatory Qualifications and Experience March 13, 2023

MATERIAL TESTING

INSPECTOR
Ted Karnegas
LABOR

COMPLIANCE

SWPPP PUBLIC OUTREACH
D. PERSONNEL

PROPOSED TEAM ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
STAFFING APPROACH:

Our approach to managing your project is to provide a lean, flexible team to save costs. Our plan is flexible and only deploys staff as they are needed. We are proposing a part time Construction Manager and a dedicated inspector who will be called out as needed by the City. 4LEAF has additional inspectors if needed during peak periods. Our trusted subconsultant firms will provide material testing, Labor Compliance, SWPPP services, and as needed public outreach assistance.

KEY STAFF PROFILES (Full resumes can be found in the Appendix)

ROGER GROSS, CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
Our proposed Construction Manager, Roger Gross, is a Certified Construction Manager with a solid track record of performance as the CM on recent successful municipal and public agency construction projects.

Roger has managed public works project for municipalities including Sacramento, Folsom and Roseville and for public agencies including California State Parks, SMUD, and Sacramento Regional Transit.

Roger is well-versed in managing construction projects and working cooperatively with municipalities, and numerous agencies and stakeholders. He has managed numerous public projects that include roadways, underground utilities, traffic signal installations, and other various streetscape improvements. He is well-versed managing projects according to the Caltrans LAPM and the associated requirements.

Principal in Charge
Bert Gross, P.E.

Construction Manager
Roger Gross, CCM
Project Admin
44 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 10 of 21
B. Mandatory Qualifications and Experience March 13, 2023 TED KARNEGAS – AS NEEDED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR
Ted Karnegas is a Construction Inspector with more than 30 years of field and management experience inspecting public works construction projects for public entities. Ted is very well acquainted with the City processes and procedures, having worked for the City of West Sacramento for many years before joining 4LEAF. Ted served on numerous City projects that include the Village Parkway Extension, Tower Bridge Gateway and West Capitol Avenue Streetscape projects, among others. His experience includes utility relocation, excavation, grading, drainage systems, and water and sewer systems, and ADA pedestrian paths.

SUBCONSULTANTS
CTS, INC. - MATERIAL TESTING / SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
Our trusted sub-consultant, CTS, Inc., will perform as needed material sampling and testing for the project. 4LEAF has a long association with CTS and has worked with them on numerous public works projects. Founded in 1994, Construction Testing Services (CTS) has provided full service special inspection, material testing and engineering for nearly $10 billion in construction, ranging from transportation and site work to water resource and other public works projects. Their state-of-the-art material testing laboratory in Rocklin is Caltrans-certified to provide comprehensive testing services.

AIM CONSULTING, INC. – PUBLIC OUTREACH
AIM Consulting, Inc. (AIM) was established in 2005 and offers strategic communications, public outreach and information consulting services. 4LEAF has worked with AIM on multiple local public works projects and is currently working with them on the City of Sacramento Downtown Mobility Project. AIM will provide as needed public outreach services, as directed by the City.

TULLY CONSULTING GROUP – SWPPP / QSP SERVICES
Our team includes the Tully Consulting Group (TCG) to provide SWPPP review and monitoring, services as needed. The TCG team of Qualified SWPPP Developers (QSDs) and practitioners (QSPs) specialize in preparing Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs), erosion control plans and providing stormwater monitoring and inspection services. Their clients include contractors, Caltrans, municipalities and school districts.

Their mission is to help contractors and local agencies protect stormwater quality and comply with stormwater and environmental permit requirements.

Tully has served alongside 4LEAF on paving projects including the Geary Road Project for the City of Walnut Creek.

SILVEIRA CONSULTING – LABOR COMPLIANCE SERVICES
Silveira Consulting offers a variety of services including Labor Compliance Monitoring for State and federally funded projects, including FTA, HBP, FHWA, and Caltrans. The firm is very familiar with the processes of the Caltrans LAPM and will adhere to these guidelines to ensure that compliance is met throughout the project.

It is their priority to verify that all aspects are being met including site visits and field interviews, certified payroll review of Davis-Bacon or State Prevailing Wage, monitoring and verification of apprentices employed on the project and cross checking of daily report activity with received certified payroll. Silveira has served on the 4LEAF CM team for numerous projects.
45 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 11 of 21
B. Mandatory Qualifications and Experience March 13, 2023 E. REFERENCES
We encourage you to contact our references and learn firsthand of their experiences working with 4LEAF.

Client: Sacramento Metropolitan Utility District (SMUD) Project: On Call Construction Inspection Services
Dates: Since 2014 – ongoing to present, multiple contract terms Client Contact David Irby, CMI Supervisor
Address: 4401 Bradshaw Road, Sacramento CA 95827
Phone/Email: (916) 997-5158; [email protected]
4LEAF Staff: Roger Gross, PM, Ted Karnegas, Inspector, Bert Gross, Principal in Charge Client: City of San Marcos
Project: Creek District Capital Improvement Project (in progress), Cost $62M Dates: 2018-2024
Contact Lewis Clapp, Principal Civil Engineer
Address: 1 Civic Center Dr. San Marcos, CA 92069
Phone/Email (760) 744-1050 x3214; (619)760-7420 cell, [email protected] 4LEAF Staff: Bert Gross, Principal in Charge

Client: City of Sacramento Department of Public Works
Project: Inspection and Plan Review – Small Cell and Fiber Dates: 2018 to present
Contact: Matt Johns, Project Manager
Phone: Office: (916) 808-5760
Email: [email protected]
4LEAF Staff: Bert Gross, Principal in Charge
Client: Water Emergency Transportation Authority (California Bay Ferry) Project: CM Services Central Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Dates: 2014-2017
Contact: Chad Mason, AICP, Planner/Analyst
Client Addr: Pier 9, Suite #111, San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (415) 291-3377 x745
Email: [email protected],
4LEAF Staff: Roger Gross – 4LEAF PM, Bert Gross, Principal Client: City of Sacramento Public Works Department
Project: CM Services – McKinley Park Water Vault Project, Cost: $40M Date: Completed Summer 2021
Contact: James Yorita, PE, Associate Engineer
Client Addr: 1395 35th Ave., Sacramento, CA 95823
Phone/Email: (916) 291-9690, [email protected]

46 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 12 of 21
B. Mandatory Qualifications and Experience March 13, 2023 F. LOCAL BENEFIT
4LEAF has had a long relationship with the City of West Sacramento, including holding business licenses with the City for nearly 20 years , Chamber of Commerce, and supporting charitable events including the West Sacramento Chamber Golf Classic and baseball teams. Our public outreach subconsultant, AIM Consulting, is well acquainted with the City and has served on several projects. They will assist our team to ensure communications are thoughtful and timely for the benefit of the community.

G. HISTORY
4LEAF has not been involved in any mergers, acquisitions, or sales of the firm in the last 3 years.

H. LEGAL CHALLENGES
There is no pending litigation against 4LEAF, Inc.

I. FISCAL VIABILITY
4LEAF has never filed (or had filed against it) any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding, whether voluntary or involuntary, or undergone the appointment of a receiver, trustee, or assignee for the benefit of creditors.

J. BUSINESS LICENSE
47 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 13 of 21
C. Technical Project Approach March 13, 2023

SECTION C TECHNICAL PROJECT APPROACH

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
This project addresses two pavement programs designed to improve and maintain City residential and arterial
pavement conditions.

The Neighborhood Pavement Preservation Program
improves the collectors and local streets south of Marshall Road, while the Arterial Streets Pavement Repair Project includes primarily Southport Parkway and Jefferson
Boulevard. The project scope involves Type II Slurry Seal, Cape Seal, Type III Micro surface, thermoplastic pavement striping.

PROJECT APPROACH
Our approach to providing CM and inspection services is straightforward:
▪ Provide you with a team of highly qualified construction professionals who know how to partner successfully with the City and the contractor’s team.
▪ Supply proven resources and innovative ideas.
▪ Offer resource flexibility.
▪ Respond to your needs.
▪ Communicate with you honestly and candidly.
▪ Work with you, as a part of your team, not as a stand‐alone consultant promoting our own agenda.

Continually evaluate our practices and improve the quality of our services in order to control quality, cost, and time.

We will staff the project with a part time Construction Manager and as needed inspector. Our subconsultant firms will provide the material testing/and special inspections, Labor Compliance and SWPPP services with 4LEAF providing all coordination as the central point of communication. 4LEAF will provide all inspection, document control, record keeping, contract administration, and the correspondence between the City and Contractor. 4LEAF will ‘hit the ground running’ and ensure that a highly qualified team is provided to meet the scope, budget and schedule for the project. Every team member will possess the necessary skills, knowledge and ability to exceed the requirements listed in this Scope of Services. This team, including COWS veteran Ted Karnegas, is familiar with all applicable Federal, State and Local regulations policies and procedures. 4LEAF will ensure all structure and roadway construction work conforms to the California Department of Transportation’s (CALTRANS) manuals, standard drawings, specifications, plans and special provisions and meets or exceeds the City standard for quality of workmanship.
48 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 14 of 21
C. Technical Project Approach March 13, 2023
TASK 1 – CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & COORDINATION

PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE
In pre-construction we lay the groundwork for the success of the project. We will develop the Construction Management Procedures (CMP) that will govern the project. The 4LEAF CM will be the main point of contact and establish immediate and routine contact and communication with the project team including the City, the design team, the contractor, and other interested parties. We will take steps to ensure successful collaborations with each of these entities.

We know from experience that many problems in the Construction Phase can be mitigated with careful planning during pre-construction. We will walk the site and conduct a constructability review of the plans/specs and identify construction challenges or potential change order work. We will review the contractor’s safety plan and ensure it is implemented. We will document the pre-construction conditions.

We will review the Traffic Control Plans and coordinate with the City Project Manager regarding the implementation of the plan. Our CM and Inspector will continually monitor the contractor’s implementation of the Traffic Control Plan, ensuring compliance for safe travel through the project site, site ingress/egress, etc.

Our team is intimately familiar with the Caltrans LAP manual and the chapter 16 documentation requirements for federally funded projects. We will keep a current, auditable set of project documentation, organized according to Caltrans file system. We have been through numerous State/federal audits and given positive feedback on the thoroughness of our files.

We will set up the project manual and establish the administrative and document control tracking systems for receiving Contractor data (Submittals, RFI, COR, CO, SWPPP, Pay Requests, etc.) using the applicable standards required by the City for progress reporting, field and lab data, material testing and compilation of As Built data. We understand the City plans to use Virtual Project Manager (VPM) on this project. 4LEAF is accustomed to using a variety of software programs for City projects, including ProCore, Viewpoint, Buzzsaw, etc., set up according to the LAPM file system.

We will set the project start and completion dates, update the master schedule We will produce cost forecasts during pre-construction to establish an accurate cost model. Beginning with pre‐construction and continuing throughout the project, we will review both the project budget and contractor’s schedule on a consistent basis, performing “what if” scenarios to benefit time and costs. We will utilize an innovative approach of a rolling forecast budget to enable management to see the project’s actual cost projection. We will establish the procedures for documenting all information related to manpower, equipment, and time for extra or force account work.

We will identify the long lead materials and equipment to facilitate early purchasing when possible.

We know that fostering communication and teamwork are critical goals of an effective construction manager. We will conduct a pre-construction meeting with the contractor, the City, and other stakeholders such as Caltrans, regulatory agencies, and utility companies. We will hold weekly progress meetings and other meetings as necessary and distribute agendas, meeting minutes, and action items to all interested parties. 49 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 15 of 21
C. Technical Project Approach March 13, 2023

CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Our Construction Manager will be responsible for all facets of coordination of construction of the project, in all phases. This includes, but is not limited to, project implementation, constructability reviews, storm water compliance, inspection, labor compliance, environmental compliance, ensure permits are approved public outreach, invoicing, payment processing, claims resolution, scheduling, quality assurance and document control.

We will review daily inspection reports by the following day and submit reports to the City’s PM at the end of each week.

PROJECT CONTROLS - SCHEDULE
4LEAF will perform schedule review, including an as-built schedule analysis that we will maintain throughout the life of the project. This as-build schedule compares the planned and durations to actual start and durations of all activities. This will clearly show activities affected by project progress, deviation from the original plan or sequence of events, and shows the actual logic. This is a reliable basis for evaluating project delays.

We will administer tracking and accounting of all bid items and materials. This tracking will be crucial to make sure all work is charged to the appropriate ten funding project numbers. All personnel provided by 4LEAF will be given any specialized training, including safety training and all necessary equipment to complete all work in accordance with the CALTRANS manuals, standard drawings, specifications, plans and special provisions.

4LEAF will provide innovative solutions to project issues as they develop. We will strive to identify issues before they become problems. Our primary focus is quality, budget, scope and schedule while conforming to all contract documents.

CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS, EXTRA WORK, CHANGE ORDERS
4LEAF will conduct research to ensure that the contractor is not presenting requests for change orders that are already included in the original scope of the contract. Our CM or project Inspector will meet face-to-face with the contractor’s representative to gather more information on the nature of the potential change order. 4LEAF will review requests for change orders and extra work requests from the contractor for contractual and technical merit and prepare independent cost estimates and schedule analysis for the proposed work. 4LEAF will keep the City informed of the cumulative cost and time impacts to the contract through a contract change order (CCO) log that will be updated upon execution of each change order. 4LEAF will take no action without the review and approval of the City.

RFI/SUBMITTALS
All Requests for Information (RFI) efforts will be handled by the 4LEAF’s Construction Manager in conjunction with the Engineer. RFI’s will be logged including all dates submitted, forwarded to design, returned from design and returned to the Contractor, responses and if a change order was required. All RFI’s will be completed in the time frame required in the Special Provisions.

PAY REQUESTS / PROGRESS PAYMENTS
4LEAF will do a thorough review of the contractor’s monthly progress payment requests to ensure the City is only making payments for work completed each month. The monthly measurements and calculations will come from the quantities measured and reported on the inspector daily reports. We will review the contractor’s schedule of values for bid items and segregate them into a form that is acceptable to the City for reimbursement. The 4LEAF 50 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 16 of 21
C. Technical Project Approach March 13, 2023
team will review the contractor’s payment requests and will compare them to the quantities calculated and measured on the Quantity Data Sheets.

After 4LEAF and the contractor agree on the monthly progress payment amount, 4LEAF will prepare the final progress payment request that details work completed each month, work completed to date, percentage complete for each item, and any applicable deductions to the net payment) for approval and execution by the City.

Additionally, 4LEAF will provide a project progress summary that includes percent of budget spent and percent of working days used.

POST CONSTRUCTION PHASE
The 4LEAF team will maintain detailed and thorough documentation throughout the project. This attention to detail will facilitate a smooth and meticulous closeout process. We will avoid the typical post-construction issues by staying on top of these issues during the construction phase. We will review and approve the final as-builts, perform final inspections, and prepare and recommend the final payment request.

During the Post-Construction phase, the 4LEAF Team will assist the City in preparing and submitting all close out documentation in accordance with the CALTRANS Local Assistance Program Manual. This includes final inspection, punch list items, Final Acceptance of Construction Final Estimate, claims, Notice of Completion, recommendations for final payment, Federal Report of Expenditures, and release of retention securities. 4LEAF’s Construction Manager will perform continual verification of files for the duration of the project. During the final closeout we simultaneously review and cross check the submittal log, RFI log, punch list and as-builts.

Additional documentation will include record drawings,
warranties and bonds for equipment, hard copies and
electronic files of all construction documentation,
contractor guaranties and warranties and maintenance
manuals.

We will provide the City with a Change Order Summary,
final detailed estimate, claims /resolutions, and final acceptance documentation. We will deliver the final
construction project reports per Chapter 17 of the
Caltrans Lap Manual, including Final Report of
Expenditures Report.

TASK 2 – MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT TESTING
4LEAF will oversee the materials testing of the project. This includes scheduling and monitoring the testing and results; and enforcing and documenting the correction of any tests that fail. Our material testing subconsultant firm, CTS, Inc. will provide all needed material testing in compliance with the project plans and specifications. They have all required equipment and facilities to perform materials sampling and testing required by the project. We anticipate minimal testing will be required - some compaction testing on the aggregate base and a curve of the material.
\
51 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 17 of 21
C. Technical Project Approach March 13, 2023
TASK 3 – LABOR COMPLIANCE
Our subconsultant firm Silveira Consulting will provide labor compliance and prevailing wage monitoring services for our team. As Labor Compliance Officer, Jamie Silveira will be responsible for overseeing the Labor Compliance efforts and monitoring the projects throughout the construction phase through closeout.

Silveira’s primary focus will be reviewing certified payroll documents, validating site interview forms and ensuring that the State and Federal prevailing wage laws are being met in accordance with the funding requirements.

TASK 4 – CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
4LEAF will provide field inspections of all improvements indicated on the project plans and specifications. Our inspector will coordinate the field material testing tasks as well as the inspections with other regulatory agencies.

Daily inspection reports will be produced that document observed construction activities and will include the number, classification, and hourly summary of contractor’s activity and equipment, weather, relevant discussions, unusual occurrences, unforeseen conditions, and other observations noted by the inspector.

Thorough inspections can uncover errors, omissions, incomplete design elements and sequences that may have been missed in the preconstruction phase. Our inspector will maintain a set of red lined drawings to incorporate contractor record drawing markups, prepare punch lists, coordinate and conduct the final inspections and acceptance walk-throughs. We will coordinate as needed to assure compliance with all requirements and will thoroughly document all inspections, both in-house and by others, on our daily reports.

TASK 5 – COMMUNITY OUTREACH (OPTIONAL TASK AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY) 4LEAF Subconsultant, AIM Consulting, will provide as needed Public Outreach services as directed by the City. For example, AIM may provide strategic advice and counsel, review project materials and reports, and produce project emails and community outreach exhibits. Under the direction of the City, AIM may also coordinate with impacted residents on behalf of the City.
52 Proposal to Provide Construction Management & Inspection Services NEIGHBORHOOD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION/ARTERIAL STREETS PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT 23-005-RFP City of West Sacramento Page 18 of 21
APPENDIX – KEY STAFF RESUMES March 13, 2023
APPENDIX Key Staff Resumes
ROGER GROSS, C.C.M. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER

TED KARNEGAS CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR
53 Roger Gross, CCM
Construction Manager
City of West Sacramento Page 19 of 21
APPENDIX – KEY STAFF RESUMES March 13, 2023
Experience Summary
Roger has more than 24 years of experience in the construction industry working as a construction manager and project manager. He has a solid track record serving as the construction manager on high visibility projects for municipalities and government agencies. His expertise includes a solid understanding of Caltrans LAPM contracting procedures.

Roger has served as the project manager for 4LEAF’s on call CM and inspection contracts with Sacramento Regional Transit, SMUD, and local municipalities including Sacramento, Roseville and Folsom. Projects involve public works and capital improvements including roadways, streetscape, underground utilities, water/sewer and public buildings.

Roger has managed keynote projects such as the $50M San Francisco Bay Ferry Central Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility. Rogers other high profile projects include the California Governor’s Mansion major renovation project where Roger dealt with the highest levels of government. Roger is a diplomatic leader in the field. He is well versed in CM responsibilities, including coordinating project communications and documentation, managing budgets, overseeing the contractor activities, and reviewing and managing the project schedule.

Roger is a Certified Construction Manager and holds a law degree. His knowledge of contract law is useful in negotiating with contractors and helping to prevent claims. He works closely with owners and local, county, and State agencies to bring projects to fruition.

Select Professional Experience
Water Emergency Transportation Authority (WETA)
Ron Cowan Central Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility, Alameda, CA
Project Manager
Roger served as the construction manager on this $50M
Design/Build project. Roger helped the owner through the critical steps of design, delivery methods, and procurement. The project consisted of the construction of the 4-story headquarters and maintenance building to house the HQ personnel, maintenance department and operational staff, fueling system, large underground fuel storage tanks and new utility infrastructure to the site. This project attained LEED Gold status. Roger managed the entire project, including budget, schedule and all the meetings.

Experience
24 years
Education
JD: University of Baltimore, School of
Law, 2002
BA Communications: California State
University, Sacramento, 1998
AA General Education: American River
College, 1995
Certifications
Certified Construction Manager
CMCI ID#: 3556
Affiliations
Member California State Bar #57491
APWA
Training
SWPPP Training – Rainy Season
NPDES, Best Management Practices
and Erosion Control Requirements.
54 City of West Sacramento Page 20 of 21
APPENDIX – KEY STAFF RESUMES March 13, 2023
Roger Gross, CCM, JD
CA Department of Parks and Recreation - El Morro Conversion Project, Lifeguard HQ and Restrooms Construction Manager
Roger provided construction management/inspection services for this project at Crystal Cove State Park on the coastline of Orange County. This was a high-profile project with a great deal of public interest consisting of more than 38 acres and encompassed coastline, protected creek/river, bluffs and CA Highway 101. The project included the construction of 4 comfort/restroom buildings and entrance kiosk, construction of all new roads, two bridges (traffic rated), bike trails, pedestrian paths, roadway and pathway lighting, installation of all new underground utilities, including sewer, storm water lines and drainage inlets, manhole construction, sewer lift stations, new fire supply lines, domestic water supply lines, trenchless directional boring, and new signage installation.

San Francisco Parks & Recreation - San Francisco Marina Yacht Harbor – West Harbor Renovation Construction Manager
Roger provided construction management services for the $25 million renovation of the San Francisco Marina Yacht Harbor, West Harbor Renovation. This time-critical and politically sensitive project was the first renovation of the San Francisco Marina in almost 50 years and was completed in time for the highly anticipated America’s Cup in San Francisco.

City of Roseville - PG&E Wales Drive Underground Gas Line Replacement Project Construction Manager
Roger provided oversight of our inspection staff, inspection services for the PG&E project to replace approximately 3.1 linear miles of natural gas Line 123. The project will increase safety by replacing the older line, and more than double current capacity as they replace the existing 12-inch-diameter steel pipe with a 16-inch-diameter pipe. The project utilizes horizontal directional drilling, jack-and-bore, and opentrench construction.

Sacramento Regional Transit District
General Construction Management Support Services
Bee Bridge Repairs
Construction Inspector
Roger provided construction management support and construction inspection on this project, supporting 4LEAF’s On Call CM/Inspection contract with Sacramento RT. The project reinstalled the bearing pad underneath the superstructure. Scope included temporary support to the end span; raising of the superstructure; inspecting and cleaning between the superstructure and abutment; and reinstalling the bearing pad and shimming to ensure equal pressure distribution between the left and right bearings.

Sacramento Regional Transit District / General Construction Management Support Services South Sacramento Corridor Phase 2 - Morrison Creek Station Inspector / Assistant CM
Roger provided construction management services on this new light rail station project on the 4.3-mile Sacramento RT Blue Line. The station platform was built as part of extension of the Blue Line to Cosumnes River College that opened in 2015. The station , anchors the eastern edge of the Stone Beetland mixeduse transit village and offers convenient bicycle and lighted pedestrian access The scope included selective demolition, cast-in-place concrete structures and pavement, pavement repairs, detectable warning tile installation, fencing, railings, metal fabrications, paints and coatings, assembly and installation of Owner Furnished shelter structures, signage, and all ancillary improvements including communication, cameras, fare equipment, electrical and lighting, landscaping and irrigation work, and water distribution work.
55 Ted Karnegas
Construction Inspector
City of West Sacramento Page 21 of 21
APPENDIX – KEY STAFF RESUMES March 13, 2023
Qualifications & Background
Ted Karnegas is a Construction Inspector with more than 30 years of field and management experience inspecting public works construction projects for public entities. He has expertise in roads, trails, utilities, streetscapes, water systems and other public works projects.

Ted is highly knowledgeable of the various construction techniques and procedures associated with public works projects and has worked on keynote projects including the Lincoln Boulevard Phase 2, Tower Bridge Gateway and West Capitol Avenue Streetscape projects. His project experience includes utility relocation, excavation, grading, drainage systems, and water and sewer systems, and ADA pedestrian paths.

Select Professional Experience
City of Lincoln - Lincoln Boulevard Improvements Phase 2 (CIP 354) Construction Inspector
Ted served as the Construction Inspector on this $2.1M project located along Lincoln Boulevard from Sterling Parkway to McBean Park Drive. The project includes new curb, gutter, sidewalk, bulb-outs, traffic signals, pavement delineation, lighting, signage, new trees, and streetscape improvements including decorative hardscape, plantings, and irrigation. This was a federal and Caltrans funded project along relinquished Highway 65.

Sacramento Metropolitan Utility District (SMUD) Power Ridge Substation Project Public Works Inspector
Ted was the inspector for this SMUD substation project at the Power Ridge and 83rd Street, recently completed. Ted provided Inspector of Record services on this and other projects as part of 4LEAF’s OnCall Construction Inspection Services contract with SMUD.

City of West Sacramento, Village Parkway/Pioneer Bluff Extension Project Public Works Inspector
Ted was the inspector for this federally funded and Caltrans Locally Administered Project that relieved traffic congestion for north-south commuters. The project constructed a new two-lane roadway, two roundabouts, decorative sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, street lighting, domestic water system, sanitary sewer and storm drain utilities. The new roadway was built to accommodates the streetcar line.

City of West Sacramento, Bridge District Infrastructure Improvements Construction Inspector
Ted was the inspector on this project that constructed approximately two miles of new roadway and improvements. Scope included modification of a Caltrans off-ramp and signal installation, full width street improvements. Project installed sewer, potable water, storm drains, streetlights, and joint trench. Work also included the demolition of existing roadway, building foundations, utility infrastructure and traffic control.

Experience
30 years
Education and Training
Cal Trans Resident Engineer (RE)
Academy Graduate
AA Degree/Engineering Yuba College
Certifications
Water Pollution Control Compliance on
Construction Site
Radiation Safety Officer for Nuclear
Gauges
Moisture Density Testing Equipment
56 Contract for Services
4LEAF, Inc
April 19, 2023

EXHIBIT B
Schedule of Performance
Contract Start Date TBD
Contract End Date December 31, 2024
57 Contract for Services
4LEAF, Inc
April 19, 2023

EXHIBIT C
Schedule of Fees
58 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
Consultant:

Project No. Contract No. Date 3/28/2023
Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total
8 $ 99.57 $ 796.56
370 $ 88.00 $ 32,560.00
250 $ 84.00 $ 21,000.00
70 $ 45.00 $ 3,150.00

LABOR COSTS
$ 57,506.56
$ -
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 57,506.56

INDIRECT COSTS

31.47% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ 18,097.31

32.99% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ 18,971.41

44.78% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ 25,751.44
j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 62,820.17
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee: 10% $ 12,032.67 l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total

0.00 $ -
$ -
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ -
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) $ 10,565.00
$ 10,455.00
Subconsultant 3: $ 25,000.00
Subconsultant 4: $ 9,000.00
Subconsultant 5: $ 15,000.00
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ 70,020.00
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 70,020.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 202,379.40
NOTES:

1. 2.

3.

Consultant
4LEAF, Inc.

CTS, Inc.

Silveira Consulting - allowance, as needed
f) Overhead & G&A (Rate:
h) General & Admin (Rate:

Description of Item
Subconsultant 1:

Subconsultant 2:

AIM Public Relations (allowance, as needed by City)
SWPPP allowance
CAD Support
23-005 Neighborhood Pavement Pgm 23-005 RFP CM, Inspection Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.

The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. 4LEAF, Inc.

CALCUATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) d) Fringe Benefits (Rate:

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name
Principal-in-Charge Bert Gross, PE
Construction Manager
Project Administrator
Inspector
to be determined
Ted Karnegas
Roger Gross, CCM
Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

X
Exhibit C
59 Project No. Contract No. Date 3/28/2023

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract
Rate Duration
$ 57,506.56 = $ 82.39 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $ 82.39 + = $ 84.86 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $ 84.86 + = $ 84.86 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $ 84.86 + = $ 84.86 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + = $ - Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 100.00% * = 698.0 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% = 698.0
Year 1 $ - * = $ - Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $ - * = $ - Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $ - * = $ - Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $ - * = $ - Estimated Hours Year 4
= $ -
= $ 57,506.56
= $ (57,506.56) Transfer to Page 1
NOTES:

1. 2.

3. 4.

0%
0 CM, Inspection Services
Total
23-005 Neighborhood Pavement Pgm
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
698
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) 698.0
698.0
Cost per Year
Estimated %
3%
per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal
698

2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Proposed Escalation
Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.

An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology).

This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 0%
698.0
Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours
Total Hours
Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) (calculated above) (calculated above)

0.0 0
0 Exhibit C
60 I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures

5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

6. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).

Name: Title *:

Date of Certification:

Email: Phone number:

Address:

List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

8896 N Winding Way, Fair Oaks, CA 95628
[email protected] (916) 965-0010
Bert Gross, P.E. Vice President
3/28/2023
Construction Management
Certification of Direct Costs:

Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
* An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

Signature: _________________________________________________ Exhibit C
61 City of West Sacramento RFP: Neighborhood Pavement Preservation and Repair Program CM Services
Public Outreach Scope of Services: AIM Consulting
Approach Overview
AIM, in collaboration with the City of West Sacramento and the project team, will implement a public coordination program for the Neighborhood Pavement Preservation Program and Arterial Streets Pavement Repair Project; Construction Management Services. Our proposed public outreach approach will focus on keeping the community and the neighborhoods, aware of, and addressing public concerns throughout construction. AIM will use a variety of tasks including establishing a project email, hotline, and webpage content, and producing communication collaterals such as door hangers, flyers, detour maps, and door hangers.

Scope of Services
Outreach Management
AIM will attend a project kick-off meeting and construction contract coordination meetings with the project team as necessary. Other project management tasks may include providing strategic advice and counsel, attending other project-related meetings, monitoring team communications, and reviewing project materials and reports.

Project Email, Resident Database, and On-Going Communications (70 Days) AIM will create a project email associated with the construction which will be published on all handouts, cards, and flyers. AIM will develop and maintain a stakeholder database throughout the project’s duration. This database will include the resident name, contact information, the preferred method of contact, and potential key concerns and/or areas of project interest.

AIM will document and respond to all electronic inquiries received through email, hotline, and social media channels. AIM will provide consistent and accurate messaging with the City and Construction Manager. A monthly log of inquiries and responses will be provided to the City and Construction Manager.

Media Relations
Working with the Construction Manager and the City of West Sacramento and their Public Information Officer, AIM will draft media releases to be used at key milestones during the construction process.

These milestones include construction updates and traffic impacts. AIM will distribute media releases to all local/regional media outlets. AIM will respond to any media requests for further information.

Communication Collateral
Brochures, Fact Sheets, and Fliers can be issued to educate the community about the project, advertise all activities and meetings, and provide notification of upcoming construction events. AIM will develop all materials utilizing a template consistent with the project brand, which can be easily updated, printed, and/or distributed through electronic means, and placed on the project webpage.

Direct Mailer Notifications (up to 3) and doorhangers (up to 200) AIM will design up to three direct mail postcards containing project information. AIM will mail the postcard to residences and property owners in the project area identified by the City, which the City will Exhibit C
62 City of West Sacramento RFP: Neighborhood Pavement Preservation and Repair Program CM Services
Public Outreach Scope of Services: AIM Consulting
provide addresses for. AIM assumes the City will handle any and all costs related to securing the mailing address data, printing the postcards, and mailing the postcards including postage.

AIM will also create and deliver a series of door hangers (up to 200) that will be printed and delivered to key areas of concern.

Exhibit C
63 PROJECT NAME: West Sacramento Neighborhood Pavement Repair AGENCY RFP NO: N/A Project
Manager
Graphics
Designer
Senior
Coordinator
Project
Coordinator
$153.48 $182.93 $108.54 $86.99 (By Task)
Outreach Management & Plan
16 0 16 0 32
$ 2,455.68 $ - $ 1,736.64 $ - $ 4,192.32
Project Email, Database and On-Going Communication (70
Days)
6 0 24 24 54
$ 920.88 $ - $ 2,604.96 $ 2,087.76 $ 5,613.60
Media Relations
Subtotal 6 0 15 8 29
$ 920.88 $ - $ 1,628.10 $ 695.92 $ 3,244.90
Communication Collateral
2 15 6 10 33
$ 306.96 $ 2,743.95 $ 651.24 $ 869.90 $ 4,572.05
Direct Mailer Notification (3) and Door Hangers
6 8 8 7 29
$ 920.88 $ 1,463.44 $ 868.32 $ 608.93 $ 3,861.57
Mileage / Parking $ 700.00
Construction Cards $ 400.00
Door Hanging $ 800.00
Printing $ 1,000.00
Direct Mailer Postage / Printing (1) $ 2,500.00
Subtotal - Direct Expenses $ 5,400.00 * Direct Expenses are estimated. Actual expenses will be billed at cost.

TOTAL HOURS 36 23 69 49 148
TOTAL LABOR FEE $ 5,525.28 $ 4,207.39 $ 7,489.26 $ 4,262.51 $ 21,484.44 TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES $ 5,400.00
TOTAL FEE PROPOSAL $ 26,884.44
Subtotal
DIRECT EXPENSES *
Subtotal

NOTES / COMMENTS
Subtotal
Subtotal

TASK DESCRIPTION

PERSONNEL / HOURLY RATE / PROJECTED HOURS AND FEE

TOTAL HOURS /
FEE
Exhibit C
64 March 27, 2023
Roger Gross
4LEAF
8896 North Winding Way
Fair Oaks, CA 95628
Re: Labor Compliance Monitoring Services
City of West Sacramento – Neighborhood Pavement Preservation Program Arterial Streets Pavement Repair
Dear Roger,
Silveira Consulting appreciates the opportunity to submit a price proposal for the Neighborhood Pavement Preservation Program Arterial Streets Pavement Repair Project. We are very much looking forward to this opportunity to work with the 4LEAF Team.

It is my understanding that this project will be a 4 month construction effort. The construction began in April 2023. Per our discussion and in review of the requirements you provided, this project contains state funding as the City is funding this project with Measure E funds.

Our efforts will be to monitor all aspects of labor compliance to alleviate the burden of this scope from your staff.

Enclosed please find our scope and proposed fee. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly.

Thank you for again for the opportunity.

Sincerely,
Jamie Silveira, President
628 C Street
Galt, CA 95632
P: 209-663-6523
E: [email protected]
Exhibit C
65

Exhibit A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant Service Agreement between 4Leaf("Client") and Silveira Consulting, Inc. ("Consultant")
Project: Neighborhood Pavement Preservation Program Arterial Streets Pavement Repair Based on the funding sources for the above mentioned project, the State of California Public Works requirements will be required. With that being said, Silveira Consulting recommends the below scope of work which includes monitoring of the state requirements to ensure complicit compliance across the board.

1. Prepare labor compliance materials for pre-bid/pre-construction meetings and participate in pre-job conference with contractors and subcontractors – discussing the Labor Compliance provisions of the contract.

2. Receive by US Mail, track and confirm contractors’ certified payroll records through our inhouse tracking program. Including verification that certified payroll has been submitted to the State per the requirements of Labor Code Section 1771.4 (a) (3).

3. Review contractors’ payment of applicable prevailing wage rates and fringe benefits, along with other state requirements to ensure compliance with the State reporting requirements.

4. Track and verify apprentice workers ratios and registration in approved State of California Apprenticeship Programs.

5. Monitor construction site for prevailing wage rates and worker classifications through site visits and worker interviews. Also, ensure state and federal jobsite postings are current and workers have access to postings and project wage determinations. Compare site visit data and certified payroll data for inconsistencies.

6. Maintain payroll files. Provide Monthly report, noting active contractors participating onsite, contractors who have completed onsite and those who are delinquent.

7. Notify contractor and subcontractors of any missing or deficient labor compliance documentation as applicable.

8. Provide labor compliance training to the City, contractor and subcontractors throughout the duration of the project.

9. Follow-up and report on delinquent payrolls and wage underpayments

10. Investigate missing and deficient documentation or violations as they pertain to state requirements. Prepare audit identifying violations and recommended restitution amounts owed to affected worker(s).

11. Assist the City in preparation of any required reports to the respective state or federal agency for the purpose of labor compliance.

12. Fulfill Public Records Act (PRA) requests for assurance of redaction policies when requested by the City.

13. Assist the City in preparation of formal complaints to be sent to Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DIR/DLSE), if necessary.

14. Includes recommendations to the City for Withholding of Contract Payments for noncompliance, as necessary

15. Update Labor Compliance Forms as needed

16. Provide all necessary reports pertaining to labor compliance monitoring to state departments and other regulatory authorities, as needed.

17. Meet with government representatives regarding labor compliance issues and responding to compliance issues, as needed.

18. Respond to audit requests on behalf of the City, as needed Exhibit C
66

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND EXPENSES
Project Fee
In review of the project funding source and the detailed information provided by the Client regarding the Neighborhood Pavement Preservation Program Arterial Streets Pavement Repair Project.

Silveira Consulting respectfully submits the following fixed fee Not to Exceed amount of $10,455.00 which reflects our services as noted in the scope of work (Exhibit A) with an anticipated construction start of April 2023.

Level of Effort
Pre-Construction Tasks Monthly
Hours
# of
Months
Hourly
Rate
Overall
Cost
Labor Compliance Officer 8 1 $125.00 $1,000
Labor Compliance Analyst 1 1 $85.00 $85
Total $1,085
Construction Tasks Monthly
Hours
# of
Months
Hourly
Rate
Overall
Cost
Labor Compliance Officer 8 4 $125.00 $4,000
Labor Compliance Analyst 8 4 $85.00 $2,720
Labor Compliance Field Investigator 3 4 $90.00 $1,140
Total $7,860
Post-Construction Tasks Monthly
Hours
# of
Months
Hourly
Rate
Overall
Cost
Labor Compliance Officer 8 1 $125.00 $1,000
Labor Compliance Analyst 6 1 $85.00 $510
Labor Compliance Field Investigator 0 1 $90.00 $0.00
Total $1,510
TOTAL: $10,455
Please note the above fee includes all labor, equipment, materials, transportation, overhead, travel, profit, insurance, sale and other taxes, licenses, incidentals, and all other related costs necessary to meet the work requirements.

Exhibit C
67 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE: QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTIONS & TESTING DATE: 03/23/2023
PROPOSAL No.: P23343
CLIENT: 1248 - 4LEAF, Inc
PROJECT: West Sac - Neighborhood Pavement Preservation
Program
LOCATION: West Sacramento, CA
ITEM: I ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED

ONSITE TESTING & INSPECTIONS DAYS HOURS PRICE TOTAL

COMPACTION TESTING
AB COMPACTION TESTING (PORTAL TO PORTAL) 7 4 $110.00 $3,080.00 ASPHALT COMPACTION TESTING (PORTAL TO PORTAL) 7 8 $110.00 $6,160.00 Preliminary Sub-Total of Onsite Testing & Inspection (approx.) $9,240.00 ITEM: II ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED

LABORATORY TESTING & ENGINEERING UNIT/HOURS PRICE TOTAL AB COMPACTION CURVE ASTM D1557 1 $275.00 $275.00
STAFF ENGINEER 4 $175.00 $700.00
PROJECT MANAGER 2 $175.00 $350.00
Preliminary Subtotal of Laboratory Testing & Engineering (approx.) $1,325.00 Preliminary Estimated Fees $10,565.00
No contingency is budgeted by CTS for uncontrollable overtime, union or prevailing wage increases and unforeseen requirements that may arise in the specifications, as well as for work over the estimated hours. Owner should budget appropriate amount for budgetary purposes.

No construction schedule was available at the time this estimate was prepared. See attached fee schedule for basis of charges.

The liability of Construction Testing Services (CTS) is limited to CTS's contract value.

Estimate includes portal to portal travel time for nuclear gauge transport from laboratory per requirements of the CA Radiological Health Branch.

Exhibit C
68 Standard Discounted
* FIELD INSPECTION AND LABORATORY SERVICE Rate/Hour Rate/Hour Steel Visual $240.00
Nondestructive - UT, MT, PT $245.00
Steel Visual/UT Combination $245.00
Concrete ACI $240.00
Concrete ICC $240.00
Masonry $240.00
Fireproofing $240.00
Shear Wall Nailing/Framing/Hold Downs $240.00
Soil Technician w/Nuclear Gauge and/or Sand Cone (portal-to-portal) $240.00 $110.00 Asphalt Technician (portal-to-portal) $240.00 $110.00
Shoring/Soldier Piers $240.00
Roofing & Waterproofing $240.00
NACE Coating Inspection - Level II $290.00
NACE Coating Inspection - Level III $350.00
Multi-Disciplined Inspector $240.00
Inspector Requiring G1 Pay Grade $290.00
Specialty Inspector or Where Formal Certification is Required $240.00 Field Inspector with Special Enhancement $240.00
Safety Manager/Safety Inspector/Jobsite Safety Accountability Supervisor (JSAS) $510.00 Laboratory Technician $240.00
Additional Sample Preparation Time $240.00
Technician Typist $240.00
**PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
Principal Engineer (Civil/Structural) $375.00
Geotechnical Engineer $330.00
Professional Geologist $315.00
Consulting Engineer (Civil/Structural) $310.00
Associate Engineer, Licensed $270.00
Project Manager $240.00 $175.00
Staff Engineer $240.00 $175.00
Field Supervision $240.00
ASNT Level III $290.00
Drafting $175.00
Quality Control Manager QOR

SPECIAL SERVICES
Portable and Mobile Laboratories, NDT and Soils QOR
* Epoxy Bolt/Expansion Anchor - Installation Observation $240.00 * Epoxy Bolt/Expansion Anchor Proof Load Testing (portal-to-portal) $240.00 * Coring, 1 Person (including equipment) (portal-to-portal) $315.00 * Coring, 2 Persons (including equipment) (portal-to-portal) $470.00 * Asphalt Coring (portal-to-portal) $340.00
Project Research QOR
Ultrasonic Testing for Non-Metallic Materials QOR
Pavement Rehabilitation Analysis Using Deflections QOR
Roof Moisture Survey QOR
Soil Drilling Equipment QOR
Geotechnical Site Investigations/Foundation Reports QOR Estimating Concrete Strength by the Maturity Method - Equipment Fee $125/kit ASTM C1074 QOR CSL/Crosshole Sonic Logging QOR
Vector Mapping QOR
Roof Uplift Testing QOR
Inclinometer Testing QOR
Vibration Moniroring/Accelerometer QOR
Tilt Monitoring QOR
External Windows And Doors Dynamic Water Penetration Testing AAMA 501.1 QOR Curtain Wall Testing AAMA 501.2 QOR
Ground Penetrating Radar QOR
DCP - Dynamic Cone Penetrometer QOR
Gamma-Gamma Logging of CIDH Piles (Daily Rate) CT233 $3,600.00 FGIA/AAMA Window and Skylight Testing (Daily Rate) ASTM E1105, AAMA 501.2, 502 503 $3,600.00 Pachometer, Schmidt Hammer, Windsor Probe, Skidmore - Equipment Fee $115/Day (portal-to-portal) $350.00 Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Testing - Equipment Fee $250/Day (portal-to-portal) ASTM C597 $700.00 Impact Echo Testing - Equipment Fee $250/Day (portal-to-portal) ASTM C1383 $350.00 Floor Flatness Testing FF/FL - Equipment Fee $115/Day (portal-to-portal) ASTM E1155 $350.00 Surface Frictional Properties Using Pendulum Tester - Equipment Fee $115/Day (portal-to-portal) ASTM E303 $350.00 Measuring Moisture Vapor Emission Rate (Calcium Chloride) - $55/Kit (portal-to-portal) ASTM F1869 $350.00 Relative Humidity Testing - $75/Kit (portal-to-portal) ASTM F2170 $350.00 Ferroscan - Equipment Fee $115/day (portal-to-portal) $350.00 GPR - Equipment Fee $115/day (portal-to-portal) $400.00 Administration, Secretarial, Special Projects, Notary, Certified Payroll $200.00 Concrete/Grout/Mortar Mix Design Review (less than 48 hours notice - $500) $375.00 Welding Procedure Review (less than 48 hours notice - $500) $375.00 Procedure Qualification Record (PQR) - Standard Procedure (document fee) $550.00 Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) - Standard Procedure (document fee) $550.00 Welder Qualification Test Record (WQTR) - Standard Procedure (document fee) $550.00 DSA Interim Reports $225.00
Geotechnical Pad Letter (less than 48 hours notice - $550) $400.00 Final Letter (less than 48 hours notice - $550) $400.00

EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY
Court appearance, per day $3,000.00
Court appearance, per half day $2,000.00
* Field inspection and laboratory technician services will be billed in accordance with minimums shown on Basis of Charges. **Professional engineering services will be billed in two hour increments. 2023 FEE SCHEDULE - P23343 03/23/2023

PERSONNEL FEES AND BASIS OF CHARGES

INSPECTIONS, ENGINEERING & SPECIAL SERVICES
inspecting
testing
engineering
All fees subject to Basis of Charges
Exhibit C
69 inspecting
testing
engineering

GENERAL
MINIMUM HOURLY CHARGES – INSPECTION
Technician personnel and the following minimum charges are contractual commitment:

One-half day or less 4 Hours
Over one-half day 8 Hours
Show-up time (less than 2 hours notice = 4 hour charge) 2 Hours

WORKING HOURS AND PREMIUM TIME
Regular workday is the first 8 hours between 6:00 am and 6:00 pm Monday through Friday. Premium time is as follows:

Overtime, Weekdays and Saturdays (first 8 hours) 1.5 x quoted hourly rate Overtime Saturdays (over 8 hours) and Sundays (first 8 hours) 2 x quoted hourly rate Overtime Sundays (over 8 hours) and Holidays 3 x quoted hourly rate Shift differential, swing and graveyard -
(Work performed between 2:00 pm and 4:00 am) 12.5%/hour additional to base or quoted rate.

MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES - Only Where Applicable
Notary Services Fee $40.00/each
Facsimile Charges. Plus $1.00/page (n/c for cover page) $7.00/minimum Wireless Router/Data Card for Jobsite Internet $135.00/day iPad Monthly Rental Fee $100.00/month
Electronic Reporting Fees/Subscriptions (PlanGrid, BIM, etc.) At Cost Parking Fees At Cost
Air Travel Cost Plus 10%
Outside Services Cost Plus 20%
Subsistence (per Union contract) $130.00/day
Subsistence Premium: Meal Allowance (over 100 miles one way) (per Union contract) $30.00/day Subsistence Premium: Meal Allowance (over 150 miles one way) (per Union contract) $85.00/day Mileage Standard Federal Rate
Sample Pickup $30.00/each
Sample Pickup Trip Charge QOR
Weekend Sample Pickup $150.00/each
Project Administration 18% of Monthly Invoice
Samples Made by Others: Concrete Cylinders $130 + Test
Samples Made by Others: All Other Tests $75.00 + Test
Laboratory Sample Witness Fee $130.00
Laboratory Sample Storage Fee (per sample) $120.00
EZ Cure Boxes (Thermostatically Controlled Curing Boxes) QOR Returned Check Fee $150.00
Additional Sample Retention QOR
TESTS

INSURANCE

PAYMENT
Testing fees shown include normal time for performing test. Samples requiring special preparation will be charged at the laboratory technician rate. Fees for tests not listed will be quoted upon request. There will be a minimum charge of $100.00 for any engineering report. Please note some tests maybe tested by subconsultants. Samples delivered to the laboratory after 3:00pm or samples needing results within 24 hours will incur a 50% mark-up.

The liability of Construction Testing Services (CTS) is limited to CTS's contract value.

Invoices will be submitted monthly or bimonthly for services performed during the preceding month and are payable on receipt. Interest of 1.5% per month (but not exceeding the maximum rate allowable by law) will be payable on any amounts not paid within 30 days, payment thereafter to be applied first to accrued interest and then to the principle unpaid amount. Attorney’s fees or other costs incurred in collecting any delinquent amount shall be paid by client. Visa, MasterCard and American Express payments are accepted however fees will apply. Visa and MasterCard payments require an additional 3% on top of the amount of the invoice being paid. American Express payments require an additional 4% on top of the amount of the invoice being paid.

Fees for tests and inspection include cost of technician, normal equipment and regular reports. Engineering services will be charged at applicable rates and will require travel and mileage charges for equipment transport and storage per code (portal to portal) from the nearest CTS laboratory. Soils testing with nuclear gauge and/or sand cone equipment and inspections requiring equipment will require applicable travel and mileage charges for equipment transport and storage per code (portal-to-portal) from the nearest CTS laboratory. Fees for special projects, services overseas, or elsewhere in the United States, will be quoted on request. With prior notification to Client; charges are subject to change at any time. Construction Testing Services reserves the right to adjust the rates quoted in this contract based upon any Union or prevailing wage increases and/or changes in any industry requirements.

BASIS OF CHARGES
All fees subject to Basis of Charges
Exhibit C
70 inspecting
testing
engineering
Standard Discounted
CONCRETE Rate/Each Rate/Hour
Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens (6x12) ASTM C39 and CT521 $95.00 Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens (4x8) ASTM C39 and CT521 $95.00 Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens (Over 8000 PSI) ASTM C39 and CT521 $170.00 Cylinder molds. 6” x 12” and 4" x 8" ASTM C470 $90.00
Compressive Strength of Lightweight Insulating Concrete ASTM C495 $110.00 Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Core and Sawed Beam Specimens ASTM C42 $145.00 Flexural Toughness of Fiber Reinforced Concrete (Round Panel) ASTM C1550 $555.00 Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading) ASTM C78 $355.00 Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading) CT523 and CT524 $355.00 Length Change of Hardened Hydraulic-Cement Mortar and Concrete (Shrinkage, 1 Sample) ASTM C157 $180.00 Shotcrete Nozzleman Qualification Letter (Per Nozzleman, Per Position) ACI 506, ASTM C42 and C1140 $505.00 Shotcrete Pre-Qualification Cores (Compression and Visual) ACI 506, ASTM C42 and C1140 $130.00 Shotcrete Production Cores ASTM C1140 $130.00
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion AASHTO T336 $580.00
Determining Density of Structural Lightweight Concrete (Cylinders) ASTM C567 $455.00 Standard Specification for Concrete Made by Volumetric Batching and Mixing ASTM C685 $1,100.00 Cement Quality Sampling CBC 2010 $705.00
Physical Testing of Gypsum, Gypsum Plasters and Gypsum Concrete ASTM C472 $70.00 Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens ASTM C496 $275.00 Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson's Ratio of Concrete in Compression ASTM C469 $255.00 Grab Sample, Sealing and Storing in a Humidity and Temperature Controlled Room CBC $165.00 Density of Hydraulic Cement ASTM C188 $225.00
Testing of Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) Test Cylinders ASTM D4832 $180.00 GFRC Pull Test PCI $445.00
GFRC Flexural Test PCI $445.00
Foaming Agents for Use in Producing Cellular Concrete Using Preformed Foam (Cell-Crete) ASTM C796 $605.00

MASONRY
Compressive Testing of Grout (Masonry) ASTM C1019 $140.00 Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars Using 2" Cube Specimens ASTM C109 $140.00 Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms ASTM C1314 $215.00 Testing Concrete Masonry Units and Related Units (Core Compression) CBC 2105A.4 $215.00 Compressive Strength of Molded Masonry Mortar Cylinders and Cubes (2" Sample) ASTM C780 A7.6 $140.00 Testing Concrete Masonry Units (CMU) and Related Units (Full Unit) ASTM C140 $215.00 Linear Drying Shrinkage of Concrete Masonry Units (Per Unit) ASTM C426 $320.00 Masonry Core Shear Testing CBC 2105A.4 $320.00
Testing Concrete Masonry Units (Absorption, Moisture Content, Unit Weight) ASTM C140 $395.00 Brick and Clay Tile (modulus of rupture, compression, saturation coefficient, suction rate, efflorescence)* ASTM C67 $1,055.00 Mortar Molds. 2” x 4”. Single Use $140.00
Mortar or Grout, Stored and Cured, Not Tested (Including Mold) $140.00 Veneer Bond Testing, does not include sample fabrication (Set of 5) ASTM C482 $530.00

AGGREGATES (CONCRETE AND SOILS)
Sieve Analysis of Coarse Aggregates (Coarse Only 2" - No.4)(sample size over 2" QOR) ASTM C136, CT202, and AASHTO T-27 $250.00 Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregates (Fine Only, Wash Included No.4 - No.200) ASTM C136/C117, CT202, and AASHTO
T-27/AASHTO T-11 $320.00
Sieve Analysis of Combined Fine and Coarse Aggregates (Wash Included 2" - No.200) (sample size over 2" QOR)
ASTM C136/C117, CT202, and AASHTO
T-27/AASHTO T-11 $405.00
Materials Finer Than 75-µm (No. 200) Sieve in Mineral Aggregates by Washing (200 Wash) ASTM C117, CT202, and AASHTO T-11 $250.00 Evaluating Cleanness of Coarse Aggregate CT227 $405.00
Soundness of Aggregates by Use of Sodium Sulfate or Magnesium Sulfate ASTM C88, CT214, and AASHTO T-104 $330.00 Bulk Density/Unit Weight of Aggregate ASTM C29, CT212, and AASHTO T-19 $230.00 Clay Lumps and Friable Particles in Aggregates ASTM C142 and AASHTO T-19 $255.00 Flat Particles, Elongated Particles or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate ASTM D4791 and CT235 $420.00 Organic Impurities in Fine Aggregates for Concrete ASTM C40 and CT213 $420.00 Density, Relative Density(Specific Gravity), and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate ASTM C127, CT206, and AASHTO T-85 $420.00 Density, Relative Density(Specific Gravity), and Absorption of Fine Aggregate ASTM C128, CT207, and AASHTO T-84 $420.00 Resistance to Degradation of Small Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine ASTM C131, C211, and AASHTO T-96 $570.00
Resistance to Degradation of Large Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine ASTM C535 $570.00
Percentage of Crushed Particles/Standard Test Method for Determining the Percentage of Fractured Particles in Coarse Aggregate ASTM D5821, CT205, and AASHTO T-335 $455.00 Uncompacted Void Content of Fine Aggregate (as Influenced by Particle Shape, Surface Texture, and Grading) ASTM C1252, CT234, and AASHTO T304A $455.00
Sand Equivalent Value of Soils and Fine Aggregate ASTM D2419, CT217, and AASHTO T-176 $320.00 Durability Index (Fine) ASTM D3744, CT229, AASHTO T-210 $455.00 Durability Index (Coarse) ASTM D3744, CT229, AASHTO T-210 $455.00 Durability Index (Fine and Coarse) ASTM D3744, CT229, AASHTO T-210 $455.00 Lightweight Particles in Aggregate ASTM C123 and AASHTO T113 QOR Resistance of Rock to Wetting and Drying CRD-C169 $630.00 Aggregate Moisture Content ASTM C566 $630.00
*Unusual sample preparation for brick specimen will be charged at the established hourly rate.

CONCRETE AND MASONRY TESTS
All fees subject to Basis of Charges
Exhibit C
71 inspecting
testing
engineering
Standard Discounted
SOILS Rate/Each Rate/Hour
Moisture Content of Soil by Oven ASTM D2216, CT226, and AASHTO T-265 $175.00 Moisture Content of Soil by Microwave Oven ASTM D4643 $230.00 Density of Soil in Place by the Drive-Cylinder Method including Moisture Content of Soil by Oven D2937 $260.00 Remold of Soil Samples Varies $155.00
Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter (Permeability) ASTM D5084 $605.00 Permeability Additional Cell Time $605.00
Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions (per point) ASTM D3080 $605.00 Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (three points) ASTM D4767 $1,105.00 Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (added points) ASTM D4767 $380.00 Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (single point) ASTM D4767 $380.00 Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (includes 3 points)(includes Pore Pressures) ASTM D4767 $1,955.00
Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (added points)(includes Pore Pressures) ASTM D4767 $655.00
Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (single point)(includes Pore Pressures) ASTM D4767 $655.00
Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (per point) ASTM D2850 $190.00 Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils with added backpressure saturation (per point) ASTM D2850 $320.00
One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils Using Incremental Loading ASTM D2435 $580.00 Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil ASTM D2166 and CT221 $230.00 Compressive Strength of Molded Soil-Cement Cylinders ASTM D1633 $305.00 Particle-Size Analysis of Soils (with Hydrometer) ASTM D422 $665.00 Particle-Size Analysis of Soils (without Hydrometer) ASTM D422 $605.00 Particle-Size Distribution of Fine Grained Soils using Sedimentation Analysis ASTM D7928 and ASTM D422 $605.00 Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis (2" - No.200) (sample size over 2" QOR) ASTM D6913 $390.00
Material Finer than No.200 by Washing (200 Wash) ASTM D1140 $240.00 Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils ASTM D4318 and CT204 $605.00 Determination of Organic Soils Classification using Liquid Limit of Soils ASTM D4318/D2487 $780.00 Organic Content of Soils and Peat ASTM D2974 $335.00
Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) Test ASTM D2487 $355.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil Using Modified Effort (Modified Proctor) ASTM D1557 $355.00 $275.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil Using Standard Effort (Standard Proctor) ASTM D698 $530.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil Using Modified DWR Method DWR Modified $530.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil Using Rapid Compaction Method ASTM D5080 $530.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil-Cement Mixtures ASTM D558 $530.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil, 1 Point Check Point ASTM D698 $405.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil, 2 Point Check Point ASTM D698 $455.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil, 3 Point Check Point ASTM D698 $530.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil, 1 Point Check Point ASTM D1557 $355.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil, 2 Point Check Point ASTM D1557 $455.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil, 3 Point Check Point ASTM D1557 $530.00 Maximum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils Using a Vibratory Table ASTM D4253 $555.00 Minimum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative Density ASTM D4254 $335.00 Maximum Dry Unit Weight of Granular Soils Using a Vibrating Hammer ASTM D7382 $505.00 Relative Compaction of Untreated and Treated Soils and Aggregates CT216 $605.00 Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabiliometer ASTM D2844 and CT301 $655.00
Expansion Index of Soils ASTM D4829 $505.00
Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer ASTM D854 $405.00 pH of Soils ASTM D4972 $555.00
Density of Hydraulic Cement ASTM C188 $380.00
Volatile Organic Content EPA 8260B QOR
Semi Volatile Organics by GC/Ms (Basic Target List) EPA 8270C QOR Total Organic Carbon ASTM 2974/EPA 5310Bm QOR
ICP Metals Concentration EPA 6020 - CAM/CCR 17 QOR
Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons: TPH, MTBE, Benzene,Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Zylenes, %SS EPA 8015B QOR ICP Metals Concentration EPA 6020 QOR
pH EPA 9045D $605.00
Sequential Batch Extraction of Waste with Acidic Extraction Fluid ASTM D5284 QOR Chromium Soluble EPA 7196A QOR
Caltrans Corrosivity Package $580.00
Determining Field and Laboratory Resistivity and pH Measurements for Soil and Water CT643 QOR Soils and Waters for Sulfate Content CT417 QOR
Soils and Waters for Chloride Content CT422 QOR
Pore Water Extraction and Determination of the Soluble Salt Content of Soils by Refractometer ASTM D4542 $705.00 California Bearing Ratio Test (does not include moisture density relations) ASTM D1883 $405.00 Bentonite Slurry Testing QOR
** Does not include sample preparation or sieve analysis * Unusual sample preparation (dried clays, saturated clays, etc.) and all other tests for treated or untreated soils, aggregate subbase and aggregate base will be charged at established rates for laboratory technician.

SOILS AND AGGREGATE SERVICES AND TESTS
All fees subject to Basis of Charges
Exhibit C
72 inspecting
testing
engineering
Standard
ASPHALT Rate/Each
Thickness/Height of Compacted Bituminous Paving Mixture Specimens Field Cores ASTM D3549 and CT308 $205.00 Bulk Specific Gravity of Compacted Bituminous Mixture (Individual field cores or lab compacted) ASTM D1188, ASTM D2726, CT308, $320.00 Lab Compaction Only of Bituminous Mixture by Marshall Apparatus (Marshall) (Per Specimen) ASTM D6926 $320.00 Lab Compaction Only of Bituminous Mixture by CA Kneading Compactor (HVEEM) (Per Specimen) ASTM D1561, CT304, and AASHTO T-247 $320.00 Lab Compaction Only of Bituminous Mixture by Superpave Gyratory (Superpave) (Per Specimen) ASTM D6925, and AASHTO T-312 $320.00 Laboratory Test Max Density (LTMD) (5 Specimen, includes compaction of specimen and bulk specific ASTM D1561/(D1188 and D2726) and $1,155.00 Superpave Bulk specific gravity (includes gyratory compaction of 3 specimen and bulk specific gravity) AASHTO T-312/T-275/T-166 $1,155.00 Marshal Lab Compacted Max Density (3 Specimen, includes compaction of specimen and bulk specific ASTM D6926/(D1188 and D2726) $1,155.00 Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity and Density (Rice) ASTM D2041, CT309, and AASHTO T-209 $505.00 Marshall Stability and Flow of Bituminous Mixtures (average Set of 3, includes sample compaction) ASTM D6926/ASTM D6927 $1,155.00 Measuring the Permeability of Bituminous Pavements and Seal Coats CT341 QOR Swell of Bituminous Mixtures CT305 $445.00
Moisture Vapor Susceptibility of Bituminous Mixtures/Moisture or Volatile Distillates in Asphalt ASTM D1461 and CT307 $1,005.00 Stabilometer Value of field compacted cores (Per Specimen) ASTM D1560, CT366, and AASHTO T-246 $450.00 Stabilometer Value of Lab compacted samples (Average of 3 Specimen, Includes Sample Compaction) ASTM D1561/D1560, CT304/CT366, and $1,155.00 Determination of Asphalt Content of Bituminous Paving Mixtures by the Ignition Method ASTM D6307, CT382, and AASHTO T-308 $455.00 Determination of Correction Factor of Bituminous Paving Mixtures by the Ignition Method ASTM D6307, CT382, and AASHTO T-308 $455.00 Quantitative Extraction of Bitumen from Bituminous Paving Mixtures (Solvent) ASTM D2172 and CT310 $805.00 Mechanical Size Analysis (Coarse and Fine) of Extracted Aggregate (Afterburn Gradation) ASTM D5444, CT202, and AASHTO T-30 $455.00 Moisture Content of Bituminous Mixture CT370 and AASHTO T-329 $480.00 Effect of Water on Compressive Strength of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures (Set of 6) ASTM D1075 $3,705.00 Compressive Strength of Bituminous Mixtures ASTM D1074 $355.00 Hamburg Wheel Track (includes compaction by gyratory)(includes 2 runs) AASHTO T324 $4,005.00 Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR) Moisture Susceptibility (includes compaction of 6 Specimen ASTM D4867 and AASHTO T-283 $4,005.00 Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR) Moisture Susceptibility (includes compaction of 12 Specimen) CT371 $6,005.00 Indirect Tensile (IDT) Strength of Bituminous Mixtures ASTM D6931 $3,755.00 Air Voids Calculation of Compacted Bituminous Mixture ASTM D3203, CT367, and AASHTO T-269 $220.00 PG Verification (Determining Low Temperature Performance Grade (PG) of Asphalt Binders) ASTM 6816 QOR

MATERIALS MECHANICAL TESTS
Mechanical Testing of Steel Products (General Tensile) ASTM A370 $555.00 Fillet Weld Break Test for Qualification (Welding) AWS B4.0 $255.00 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, Tension Testing Wrought and Cast Aluminum and Magnesium-Alloy ASTM E8, B557 and AWS B4.0 $555.00 Mechanical Testing of Steel Products (Couplers) ASTM A370 $555.00 Impact Testing of Miniaturized Charpy V-Notch Specimens, Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic ASTM E2248 and ASTM E23 QOR Testing, Practices, and Terminology for Chemical Analysis of Steel Products ASTM A751 $380.00 Mechanical Testing of Steel Products & Bend Testing of Material for Ductility; #3-#8 ASTM A370 and E290 $445.00 Mechanical Testing of Steel Products & Bend Testing of Material for Ductility; #9-#11 ASTM A370 and E290 $505.00 Mechanical Testing of Steel Products & Bend Testing of Material for Ductility; #14+ ASTM A370 and E290 QOR Mechanical Testing of Steel Products, Standard Specification for Steel Wire, Plain, for Concrete ASTM A370, A82 and A185 $505.00 Guided Bend Test for Ductility of Welds, Mechanical Testing of Welds ASTM E190 and AWS B4.0 $355.00 Determining the Mechanical Properties of Externally and Internally Threaded Fasteners, Anchor Bolts ASTM F307, F1554 and F606 $605.00 Rockwell Hardness of Metallic Materials ASTM E18 $190.00 Proof Test for Carbon and Alloy Steel (Nuts Only) ASTM A194 or A563 $380.00 Radiographic Examination of Metallic Castings/Weldments ASTM E94, E1030 and E1032 QOR Macroetching Metals and Alloys ASTM E340, E381 and AWS $380.00 Determining the Mechanical Properties of Externally and Internally Threaded Fasteners, Washers, Direct ASTM F606 $430.00 Mechanical Testing of Steel Products (Terminators Tensile) ASTM A370 $430.00 Strength for Sewn or Bonded Seams of Geotextiles ASTM D4884 $380.00 Tearing Strength of Fabrics by the Tongue (Single Rip) Procedure ASTM D2261 $380.00 Breaking Strength and Elongation of Textile Fabrics (Grab Test) ASTM D5034 $330.00 Tensile Properties of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars ASTM D3039 $1,055.00 Steel Strand, Uncoated Seven-Wire for Prestressed Concrete (Set of 2) ASTM A416 and A1061 $1,605.00

FIREPROOFING
Thickness and Density of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material (SFRM) ASTM E605 $300.00 Cohesion/Adhesion of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Materials (Test Kit Only) ASTM E736 $90.00

CONTACT INFORMATION
Headquarters: 2118 Rheem Drive • Pleasanton, CA 94588 • P 925.462.5151 • F 925.462.5183 Peninsula: 44 Tehama, Suite 305 • San Francisco, CA 94105 • P 415.334.4747 • F 415.438.2357 Oakland: 246 30th Street, Suite 101 • Oakland, CA 94601 • P 510.444.4747 • F 510.835.1825 Stockton: 343 East Main Street, #711 • Stockton, CA 95202 • P 209.507.7555 • F 209.507.7554 Rocklin: 4400 Yankee Hill Road • Rocklin, CA 95677 • P 916.419.4747 • F 916.419.4774 Las Vegas: 3842 E. Post Road • Las Vegas, NV 89120 • P 702.257.4747 • F 702.257.4718

ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SERVICES AND TESTS

MECHANICAL TESTS AND FIREPROOFING
San Jose: 2033 Gateway Place, #500 • San Jose, CA 95110 • P 408.573.6992 • F 408.437.1201 All fees subject to Basis of Charges
Exhibit C
73 EXHIBIT D
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR CODE § 3700
[Labor Code § 1861]
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.

CONSULTANTS
By:

Burt Gross, P.E., Vice President
74 EXHIBIT E

LABOR COMPLIANCE

1. PREVAILING WAGE
A. The Work contemplated herein constitutes a public work within the meaning of Labor Code sections 1720 and 1771. It shall be mandatory upon the Consultant and upon any Subcontractor, to pay not less than the said specified prevailing rates of wages to all workers employed by them under the Contract in accordance with Labor Code section 1774. The Director of the Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR") of the State of California has determined the general prevailing rate of wages of per diem wages in the locality in which the work is to be performed for each craft or type of worker needed to execute the Contract. The Consultant acknowledges that it has examined the prevailing rate of per diem wages as established by the DIR. Copies of the current schedules for prevailing wages are on file at City Hall, and the contents of those schedules are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. The Consultant shall post a copy of the applicable prevailing wage determinations at each job site, along with any other work place posters required by law.

B. The City will not recognize any claims for additional compensation because of the payment of prevailing wages. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by the Consultant in determining its proposal, and will not under any circumstances be considered as the basis of a claim against the City.

C. By executing this Contract Consultant warrants that it has registered with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with Labor Code section 1725.5.

2. PREVAILING WAGE RECORDS
A. The Consultant and each subcontractor shall keep an accurate payroll record which shows the name, address, social security number, correct work classification (in accordance with the wage decision), both straight and overtime worked each day and week, and hourly rate of pay, gross wages earned, deductions made and net wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker or other employee paid by the Consultant /subcontractor in connection with the Work. These payroll records shall be certified and shall be made available at Consultant's principal office. These records shall be maintained during the course of the Work. The Consultant and all subcontractors shall make the certified payroll records available for inspection by City representatives upon request and shall permit such representatives to interview employees during the work hours on the job site.

B. The City shall notify the Consultant in writing of any discrepancies or violations that are discovered during such inspections. Written notification pursuant to this Section shall include the actions that will be necessary to resolve the discrepancies and/or violations. The Consultant shall be held entirely responsible for the prompt resolution of all non-compliances with the prevailing wage laws, including those pertaining to all subcontractors and any lower-tier subcontractors. The Consultant shall forfeit as penalty to the City the amount specified by law for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker (whether employed by the Consultant or any subcontractor) paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under the Contract in violation of the provisions of the Labor Code and in particular, Section 1775.

C. To the extent applicable, Consultant and subcontractors shall maintain and furnish to the Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR"), a certified copy of each weekly payroll (but no less often than monthly), with a statement of compliance signed under penalty of perjury. Such certified payroll reports shall be transmitted electronically to the DIR.

D. The City will not recognize any claims for additional compensation because of the payment of the prevailing wages. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by the Consultant 75 in entering into the Contract, and will not under any circumstances, other than delays caused by the City, or the City’s agents, be considered as the basis of a claim against the City.

3. Labor Discrimination
Attention is directed to Section 1735 of the Labor Code, which reads as follows:
“No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of their race, color, national origin or ancestry, physical handicap, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such person, except as provided in Section 12940 of the Government Code, and every General Contractor for public works violating this section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of this chapter.”
4 Eight-Hour Day Limitation
(a) In accordance with the provisions of the Labor Code, and in particular, Sections 1810 to 1815 thereof, inclusive, incorporated herein by reference, eight hours labor shall constitute a day's work, and no worker in the employ of Consultant, or any Subcontractor, doing or contracting to do any part of the work contemplated by the Contract, shall be required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of those provisions; provided that subject to Labor Code Section 1815, a worker may perform work in excess of either eight (8) hours per day or forty (40) hours during any one week upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours per day or forty (40) hours during any one week at not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay. (b) The Consultant and each Subcontractor shall also keep an accurate record showing the names and actual hours worked of all workers employed by them in connection with the Contract. This record shall be open at all reasonable hours to the inspection of the City. It is hereby further agreed that, except as provided in (a) above, the Consultant shall forfeit as a penalty to the City the sum of twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the performance of the Contract by the Consultant or by any of its Subcontractors for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in and one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of Sections 1810 through 1815.

5. Compliance with State Requirements for Employment of Apprentices (a) The Consultant's attention is directed to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code. Provisions of said Section pertaining to employment of registered apprentices are hereby incorporated by reference into this Contract. As applicable, the Consultant or any Subcontractor employed by the Consultant in the performance of this Contract shall take such actions as necessary to comply with the provisions of Section 1777.5. 76 77

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 19, 2023 ITEM # 5
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING AND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 23-5 AMENDING TITLE 10 (VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING

TO THE RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (CIP 12019)
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Joanna Ortiz, Assistant Engineer
Christian Asuncion, Associate Civil Engineer
Capital Projects Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to consider the approval of proposed amendments to Title 10 of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1) Waive the second reading and read by title and number only, Ordinance 23-5, amending Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento; and
2) Approve Ordinance 23-5, amending Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento.

BACKGROUND
The City of West Sacramento is dedicated to providing a safe environment for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Setting speed limits requires a rational procedure to maintain the confidence of the public and legal systems. Determining speed limits relies on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of drivers. According to the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 22358, posted speed limits along collector and arterial roadways must be established and justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey. These posted speed limits must also be updated every seven (7) years and can be extended to ten (10) years when a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred.

The last update to the Citywide speed limit surveys was conducted in 2013. On August 3rd, 2020, City staff solicited proposals for professional services with a Request for Proposal (RFP) posted to the City website. The City received proposals from the following three firms, listed in alphabetical order:
 Kimley Horn
 Mott MacDonald
 TJKM
A three (3) person panel ranked and evaluated the proposals. The panel concluded that Mott MacDonald was the most qualified consultant to complete this assignment and to do so in a timely manner. The City Council approved the contract with Mott MacDonald on November 18, 2020.

Upon approval of the Mott MacDonald contract, City staff, in coordination with the Police Department, prioritized approximately 15 segments throughout the City. The radar speed surveys for these prioritized segments were conducted by National Data & Surveying (NDS) from February-April 2021.

Since speed limits are codified in the City Municipal Code, even though there were no speed limit changes proposed, an ordinance was required to reestablish the speed limits with the correct date of the reestablishment in code. Ordinance 21-09 was approved by City Council on June 16, 2021.

Following approval of Ordinance 21-09, City staff prioritized a second set of segments to evaluate throughout the City. The radar speed surveys for these segments were conducted by National Data & Surveying (NDS) from June-July 2021. 78
Citywide Speed Limit Survey Project
April 19, 2023

Ordinance 22-15 for the second set of segments was approved by City Council on April 6, 2022.

ANALYSIS
Following approval of Ordinance 22-15, City staff prioritized a third set of segments to evaluate throughout the City.

The third set of segments along with the recommended changes are listed in the table below:

Road Segment Name
Current
Posted
Speed Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Speed
Limit
Change?
1 Anna Street between Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive 25 25 No 2 Boatman Avenue between Industrial Boulevard and Terminal Street 25 25 No
3 Bryte Avenue between Riverbank Road and Sacramento Ave 25 25 No 4 C Street between 5th Street and City Limit 25 30 Yes
5 Carlin Drive between Oates Drive and Ramco Street 30 35 Yes 6 Carrie Street between Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive 25 25 No 7 Cebrian Street between Del Monte Street and Stone
Boulevard 30 30 No
8 Channel Drive between Seaport Boulevard and Channel
Drive (west end) 35 35 No
9 Commerce Drive between west end and east end. 25 25 No 10 Davis Road between Seymour Avenue and Jefferson
Boulevard 25 30 Yes
11 Douglas Street between Lighthouse Drive and Sacramento Avenue 25 25 No
12 Duluth Street between Galveston Street and Harbor
Boulevard 25 25 No
13 Evergreen Ave between Pine Street and Harbor Boulevard 25 30 Yes 14 Evergreen Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Coke
Street 25 30 Yes
15 Front Street between Shore Street and Terminal Street 25 25 No 16 Galveston Street between Duluth Street and Houston Street 25 25 No 17 Golden Gate Drive between Oakland Bay Drive and
Promenade Street 30 30 No
18 Golden Gate Drive between Promenade Street and Marshall Road 30 30 No
19 Gregory Avenue between Bevan Road and South River
Road 45 45 No
20 Harmon Road between Jefferson Boulevard and Antioch
Avenue 40 30 Yes
21 Hart Avenue between Allen Avenue and Higgins Road 25 25 No 22 Houston Street between West Capitol Avenue and Duluth Street 25 25 No
23 Higgins Road between Linden Road and Hart Avenue 25 25 No 24 Higgins Road between Hart Ave and Jefferson Blvd 25 25 No 25 Jefferson Boulevard between West Capitol Avenue and 15th Street 35 35 No
26 Jefferson Boulevard between Davis Road and Southport Parkway 55 55 No
27 Lighthouse Drive between Fountain Drive and Kegle Drive 25 25 No 28 Maple Street between West Capitol Avenue and Michigan Boulevard 25 25 No
79 Citywide Speed Limit Survey Project
April 19, 2023

29 Merkley Avenue between Sycamore Street and Westacre
Road 25 25 No
30 Michigan Boulevard between Pecan Street and Portsmouth Avenue 25 25 No
31 Michigan Boulevard between Portsmouth Avenue and
Jefferson Boulevard 25 25 No
32 North Harbor Boulevard between Riverbank Road and Reed Avenue 45 45 No
33 Northport Drive between Commerce Drive and West Capitol Avenue 25 30 Yes
34 Oakland Bay Drive between Southport Parkway and Golden Gate Drive (east) 35 35 No
35 Oates Street between Carlin Drive and Ramos Drive 25 30 Yes 36 Pine Street between West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen Avenue 25 25 No
37 Poplar Street between Evergreen Avenue and Michigan
Boulevard 25 25 No
38 Port Street between Shore Street and Terminal Street 25 30 Yes 39 Promenade Way between Ramos Drive and Golden Gate
Drive 30 30 No
40 Ramco Street between Southport Pkwy and south end
terminus 35 35 No
41 Ramos Drive between Oates Street and Promenade Street 25 30 Yes 42 Riverbank Road between North Harbor Road and Bryte
Avenue 25 25 No
43 Seaport Boulevard between West End and Parkway
Boulevard 35 35 No
44 Shore Street between Front Street and Del Monte Street 30 30 No 45 Stonegate Drive between Lake Washington Blvd and Village Parkway 35 35 No
46 Sutter Street between West Capitol Avenue and north end terminus n/a 25 Yes
47 Sycamore Street between West Capitol Avenue and
Evergreen Avenue 25 25 No
48 Terminal Street between Del Monte Street and Industrial Boulevard 30 30 No
49 Todhunter Avenue between Anna Street and Sacramento
Avenue 25 25 No
50 Westacre Road between Michigan Boulevard and West
Capitol Avenue 25 25 No
51 3
rd Street between B Street and West Capitol Avenue 25 25 No 52 15th Street between Jefferson Boulevard and South River Road 25 30 Yes
Out of the 53 segments studied, 12 of the segments were recommended to have speed limit changes. For these 12 segments, the 85th percentile was significantly greater than the currently posted speed limit, and this required further evaluation.

According to the CA Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devises (CA MUTCD) Section 2B.13, paragraph 12a, the posted speed limit “shall be established at the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of freeflowing traffic” The CA-MUTCD also allows for further evaluation by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer in order to lower the posted speed limits. A lower speed limit could be justified by consideration of accident data, conditions not readily apparent to the driver, residential density, and pedestrian and bicycle safety. 80 Citywide Speed Limit Survey Project
April 19, 2023

For 11 of the segments with recommended speed changes, the Traffic Engineer and City Staff determined there were no conditions that would allow for a lower speed limit recommendation. For Harmon Rd, the Traffic Engineer recommended a speed reduction from 40 mph to 30 mph.

Environmental Considerations
Not Applicable.

Commission Recommendations
City staff presented an update of the 53 segments to the Transportation, Mobility & Infrastructure Commission on February 6, 2023. This item does not require further policy guidance from the Commission.

Strategic Plan Integration
Not Applicable.

Alternatives
The City Council’s primary alternatives are summarized below:
1) Approve the recommended action as stated above.
2) Delay or revise the recommended action.
3) Not approve the recommended action.

Alternative 1 is staff’s recommended action. Alternative 2 and 3 would further delay updating posted speed limits as required per CVC 22358.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Capital Projects Department in coordination with and review by the Finance Department, Police Department, and the City Attorney’s Office.

Budget/Cost Impact
On September 18, 2019, the City Council approved the current Capital Improvement Program (CIP) which included an appropriation of $290,000 in CIP 12019 funded by Fund 107 to complete the project. No additional funding appropriations are required or being requested at this time.

ATTACHMENT(S)
1) Ordinance 23-5
2) 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
81 Attachment 1
ORDINANCE 23-5

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO AMENDING MUNICIAPL CODE CHAPTER 10.18 The City Council of the City of West Sacramento does ordain as follows:

Section 1. Purpose and Authority. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend Chapter

10.18 of the Municipal Code
Section 2. Authority. The City Council enacts this Ordinance in accordance with the authority granted to cities by State law.

Section 2. Amendment. Section 10.18.010 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Chapter 10.18 SPEED LIMITS

10.18.010 Findings.

A. Pursuant to Chapter 10.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code, on April 19, 2023, the city council of the city of West Sacramento reviewed and considered the engineering and traffic survey, and related information, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

B. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the city council finds that the following streets shall have the following posted speed limits:

Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Anna Street Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive 25
Boatman Avenue Industrial Boulevard and Terminal
Street 25
Bryte Avenue Riverbank Road and Sacramento Ave 25
C Street 5
th Street and City Limit 30
Carlin Drive Oates Drive and Ramco Street 35
Carrie Street Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive 25
Cebrian Street Del Monte Street and Stone Boulevard 30
Channel Drive Seaport Boulevard and Channel Drive 35
Commerce Drive West end and east end 25
Davis Road Seymour Avenue and Jefferson
Boulevard 30
82 Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Douglas Street Lighthouse Drive and Sacramento
Avenue 25
Duluth Street Galveston Street and Harbor Boulevard 25
Evergreen Ave Pine Street and Harbor Boulevard 30
Evergreen Ave Harbor Boulevard and Coke Street 30
Front Street Shore Street and Terminal Street 25
Galveston Street Duluth Street and Houston Street 25
Golden Gate Drive Oakland Bay Drive and Promenade
Street 30
Golden Gate Drive Promenade Street and Marshall Road 30 Gregory Avenue Bevan Road and South River Road 45
Harmon Road Jefferson Boulevard and Antioch
Avenue 30
Hart Avenue Allen Avenue and Higgins Road 25
Houston Street West Capitol Avenue and Duluth Street 25 Higgins Road Linden Road and Hart Avenue 25
Higgins Road Hart Ave and Jefferson Blvd 25
Jefferson Boulevard West Capitol Avenue and 15th Street 35 Jefferson Boulevard Davis Road and Southport Parkway 55 Lighthouse Drive Fountain Drive and Kegle Drive 25
Maple Street West Capitol Avenue and Michigan
Boulevard 25
Merkley Avenue Sycamore Street and Westacre Road 25
Michigan Boulevard Pecan Street and Portsmouth Avenue 25 Michigan Boulevard Portsmouth Avenue and Jefferson
Boulevard 25
North Harbor Boulevard Riverbank Road and Reed Avenue 45 Northport Drive Commerce Drive and West Capitol
Avenue 30
Oakland Bay Drive Southport Parkway and Golden Gate
Drive (east) 35
Oates Street Carlin Drive and Ramos Drive 30
Pine Street West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen
Avenue 25
83 Ordinance 23-5
April 19, 2023
Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Poplar Street Evergreen Avenue and Michigan
Boulevard 25
Port Street Shore Street and Terminal Street 30
Promenade Way Ramos Drive and Golden Gate Drive 30
Ramco Street Southport Pkwy and south end terminus 35
Ramco Street Oates Street and Promenade Street 30
Riverbank Road North Harbor Road and Bryte Avenue 25
Seaport Boulevard West End and Parkway Boulevard 35
Shore Street Front Street and Del Monte Street 30
Stonegate Drive Lake Washington Blvd and Village
Parkway 35
Sutter Street West Capitol Avenue and north end
terminus 25
Sycamore Street West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen
Avenue 25
Terminal Street Del Monte Street and Industrial
Boulevard 30
Todhunter Avenue Anna Street and Sacramento Avenue 25
Westacre Road Michigan Boulevard and West Capitol
Avenue 25
3 rd Street B Street and West Capitol Avenue 25
15th Street Jefferson Boulevard and South River
Road 30
C. Pursuant to Chapter 10.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code, on April 6, 2022, the city council of the city of West Sacramento reviewed and considered the engineering and traffic survey, and related information, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

D. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the city council finds that the following streets shall have the following posted speed limits:

Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Linden Rd. (North) Summerfield Dr. to Jefferson Blvd. 35 Linden Rd Stonegate Dr. to Alder Way 35
Del Monte St. Harbor Blvd to Cebrian St 35
84 Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Cummins St. Kegle Dr. to 6th St. 25
Sunset Ave. North Harbor Blvd. to Sacramento Ave. 35
Davis Rd. Jefferson Blvd. to Antioch Ave. 40
Davis Rd. Antioch Ave. to South River Rd. 40
Harbor Blvd. Reed Ave. to Rice Ave. 35
Jefferson Blvd. Sacramento Ave. to West Capitol Ave. 40 Jefferson Blvd. Stone Blvd. to Lake Washington Blvd. 45 Jefferson Blvd. Lake Washington Blvd to Linden Rd.
(South) 45
Jefferson Blvd. Linden Rd. (South) to Davis Rd. 45
Kegle Dr. Anna St. to Sacramento Ave. 25
Lake Washington Blvd. Jefferson Blvd. to Stonegate Dr. 35 Linden Rd. (South) Summerfield Dr. to Jefferson Blvd. 35 Linden Rd. Jefferson Blvd. to Stonegate Dr. 35
Sacramento Ave. Kegle Dr. to 6th St. 40
Southport Pkwy. Promenade St. to Marshall St. 45
Southport Pkwy. Marshall Rd. to Jefferson Blvd. 35
Enterprise Blvd. Seaport Blvd. to Channel Dr. 35
Riverside Pkwy. Reed Ave to Stillwater Rd. 35
6 th St. Cummins Way to C Street 25
Embarcadero Dr. Riverside Pkwy. (N) to Riverside Pkwy.
(S) 30
F St. 8
th St. to 2nd St. 30
Marshall Rd. Seymour Ave to Jefferson Blvd. 35
F St. Jefferson Blvd to 8th St. 35
E. Pursuant to Chapter 10.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code, on July 14, 2021, the city council of the city of West Sacramento reviewed and considered the engineering and traffic survey, and related information, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

F. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the city council finds that the following streets shall have the following posted speed limits:
85 Ordinance 23-5
April 19, 2023
Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Enterprise Boulevard West Capitol Avenue to Seaport Blvd. 40 Gregory Avenue Jefferson Boulevard to Bevan Road 45
Harbor Boulevard Rice Avenue to West Capitol Avenue 35
Harbor Boulevard West Capitol Avenue to Industrial
Boulevard 35
Industrial Boulevard Enterprise Boulevard to Parkway
Boulevard 45
Industrial Boulevard Parkway Boulevard to Harbor Boulevard 45 Industrial Boulevard Harbor Boulevard to Stone Boulevard 45 Jefferson Boulevard 15th Street to Stone Boulevard 45
Lake Washington
Boulevard Stone Boulevard to Jefferson Boulevard 45
Reed Avenue Riverside Parkway to Sunset Avenue 40
Sacramento Avenue Sunset Avenue to Kegle Drive 40
Southport Parkway Ramco Street to Lake Washington
Boulevard 45
Stillwater Road Reed Avenue to Riverside Parkway 40
Stone Boulevard Park Boulevard and Jefferson Parkway 25 5th Street A Street to West Capitol Avenue 35
Section 3. Severability. If any provision of this chapter, or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, the remainder of this chapter, to the extent it can be given effect, or the application of those provisions to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are severable.

Section 4. Effective Date and Publication. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its adoption, and pursuant to Resolution 99-46 was published in summary format prior to adoption, and a summary will be published within 15 days after adoption in a paper of general circulation published and circulated within the City of West Sacramento. 86 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento this 19th day of April 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST: Approved as to form:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney CODIFY X UNCODIFY __________
87 Engineering & Traffic Surveys
City of West Sacramento
February 2023
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 88 507323716 REP A
C:\Users\NAR77489\Desktop\507367762-001 -
SR33_HenryMiller_TOAR_ICE_11302019.docx
Mott MacDonald
Mott MacDonald
180 Promenade Circle
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95834
Engineering & Traffic Surveys
City of West Sacramento
Final Report
February 2023

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 89 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys
Final Report
504100132-Cityofwestsac_Speedsurveysreport_02152023.Docx Issue and revision record
Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description
1 12/27/2022 RN JN TA Draft Report
2 02/15/2023 RN JN TA Final Report
Information class: Standard
This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the abovecaptioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose.

We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties.

This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.

This R eport has been prepar ed sol ely for use by the party w hich commissi oned it (the 'Client') in connection wi th the capti oned pr oject. It shoul d not be used for any other purpose. N o person other than the Client or any party w ho has expr essly agreed terms of reli ance with us (the 'Recipi ent(s)') may r ely on the content, information or any views expr essed in the R eport. This R eport is confi denti al and contains pr opri etary intell ectual pr operty and we accept no duty of car e, r esponsibility or li ability to any other recipi ent of this R eport. N o repr esentati on, w arranty or undertaki ng, express or im plied, is made and no responsi bility or liability is accepted by us to any party other than the Client or any Reci pient(s), as to the accuracy or com pleteness of the i nformati on contai ned i n this R eport. For the avoi dance of doubt thi s Report does not i n any w ay pur port to i nclude any legal, insurance or fi nanci al advice or opi nion.

We disclaim all and any liability w hether arising i n tort, contr act or otherwise w hich we might otherwise have to any party other than the Cli ent or the Reci pient(s), in respect of this Report, or any inform ation contained in it. W e accept no responsi bility for any error or omissi on in the Report w hich is due to an error or omissi on in data, i nformation or statements supplied to us by other parti es i ncludi ng the Cli ent (the 'Data'). We have not independently verified the D ata or otherwise exami ned i t to determi ne the accuracy, com pleteness, sufficiency for any purpose or feasi bility for any particular outcome incl uding fi nanci al.

Forecasts presented i n this docum ent w ere pr epared usi ng the Data and the Repor t is dependent or based on the D ata. Inevitably, som e of the assumptions used to develop the for ecasts will not be realised and unantici pated events and circumstances m ay occur. C onsequently, we do not guarantee or w arrant the conclusions contained in the R eport as ther e are likely to be differences betw een the forecasts and the actual results and those differ ences may be m aterial. While we consi der that the information and opini ons given in this R eport are sound all parti es m ust rely on their ow n skill and judgem ent when m aking use of it.

Information and opi nions ar e current only as of the date of the Report and w e accept no responsi bility for updati ng such information or opi nion. It shoul d, therefor e, not be assum ed that any such inform ati on or opi nion conti nues to be accurate subsequent to the date of the Report. U nder no circum stances m ay this Report or any extract or summ ary thereof be used i n connecti on with any public or private securities offeri ng incl udi ng any related m emor andum or pr ospectus for any securiti es offering or stock exchange listi ng or announcem ent.

By acceptance of this Repor t you agree to be bound by this disclaim er. This disclaim er and any issues, disputes or cl aims arising out of or in connection wi th it (whether contractual or non-contractual i n natur e such as cl aims i n tort, from br each of statute or regul ati on or otherwise) shall be governed by, and constr ued i n accordance with, the law s of Engl and and W ales to the exclusion of all conflict of l aws principles and r ules. All disputes or claims arising out of or r elati ng to this discl aimer shall be subject to the excl usive jurisdicti on of the English and Welsh courts to w hich the parties irrevocably su bmit.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 90 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys
Final Report
504100132-Cityofwestsac_Speedsurveysreport_02152023.Docx Contents
Executive Summary 1
Certification 2
1 Introduction 3
2 Study Purpose and Methodology 5

2.1 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements 5

2.2 Speed Data Collection 7

2.3 Traffic Count Data Collection 8

2.4 Collision Data Analysis 9

2.5 Field Reviews and ‘Floating Car’ Surveys 10
3 Data Summary & Recommendations 11

3.1 Data Summary 11

3.2 Speed Limit Recommendations 11
Appendix 15
Not the
Tables
Table 1: Statewide Average Accident Rates for Roadway Types 10 Table 2: Roadway Classification, Traffic Count and Collision Data Summary 12 Table 3: E&TS Summary 13
Table 4: Summary of Speed Limit Recommendations 14
Figures
Figure 1: Citywide Speed Survey Locations Map 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 91 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 1
Final Report
Executive Summary
This Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) report prepared in conformance with requirements contained in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD, Revision 6, effective 03/30/2021) for speed zone studies, summarizes the data, evaluation, findings and recommendations for posted speed limits on study roadway segments in the City of West Sacramento. The study segments as identified by City staff are listed as follows:

Of the segments listed above, based on the data, analysis and findings contained in this report, speed limit changes are recommended for the following segments.

For all other segments, current posted speed limits are recommended to be retained.

Detailed discussions are contained in subsequent sections of this report.

City's
Index
#
Road Segment Name
1 Anna Street between Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive.
2 Boatman Avenue between Industrial Boulevard and Terminal Street. 3 Bryte Avenue between Riverbank Road and Sacramento Avenue. 4 C Street between 5th Street and City Limit.
5 Carlin Drive between Oates Drive and Ramco Street.
6 Carrie Street between Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive.
7 Cebrian Street between Del Monte Street and Stone Boulevard. 8 Channel Drive between Seaport Boulevard and Channel Drive (westend). 9 Commerce Drive between West End and East End.
11 Davis Road between Seymour Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard. 15 Douglas Street between Lighthouse Drive and Sacramento Avenue. 16 Duluth Street between Galveston Street and Harbor Boulevard. 20 Evergreen Avenue between Pine Street and Harbor Boulevard. 21 Evergreen Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Coke Street. 24 Front Street between Shore Street and Terminal Street. 25 Galveston Street between Duluth Street and Houston Street. 26 Golden Gate Drive between Oakland Bay Drive and Promenade Street. 27 Golden Gate Drive between Promenade Street and Marshall Road. 29 Gregory Avenue between Bevan Road and South River Road. 33 Harmon Road between Jefferson Boulevard and Antioch Avenue. 34 Hart Avenue between Allen Avenue and Higgins Road.
35 Houston Street between West Capitol Avenue and Duluth Street. 36 Higgins Road between Linden Road and Hart Avenue.
37 Higgins Road Hart Ave. to Jefferson Blvd.
42 Jefferson Boulevard between West Capitol Avenue and 15th Street. 47 Jefferson Boulevard between Davis Road and Southport Parkway. 55 Lighthouse Drive between Fountain Drive and Kegle Drive.

City's
Index
#
Road Segment Name
61 Maple Street between West Capitol Avenue and Michigan Boulevard. 64 Merkley Avenue between Sycamore Street and Westacre Road. 66 Michigan Boulevard between Pecan Street and Portsmouth Avenue 67 Michigan Boulevard between Portsmouth Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard. 68 North Harbor Boulevard between Riverbank Road and Reed Avenue. 70 Northport Drive between Commerce Drive and West Capitol Avenue. 71 Oakland Bay Drive between Southport Parkway and Golden Gate Drive (East) 72 Oates Street between Carlin Drive and Ramos Drive.
75 Pine Street between West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen Avenue. 76 Poplar Street between Evergreen Avenue and Michigan Boulevard. 77 Port Street between Shore Street and Terminal Street. 78 Promenade Way between Ramos Drive and Golden Gate Drive. 79 Ramco Street between Southport Pkwy and South End
80 Ramos Drive between Oates Street and Promenade Street. 83 Riverbank Road between North Harbor Road and Bryte Avenue. 87 Seaport Boulevard between West End and Parkway Boulevard. 88 Shore Street between Front Street and Del Monte Street. 102 Stonegate Drive between Lake Washington Boulevard and Village Parkway. 104 Sutter Street between West Capitol Avenue and North End. 105 Sycamore Street between West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen Avenue. 106 Terminal Street between Del Monte Street and Industrial Boulevard. 107 Todhunter Avenue between Anna Street and Sacramento Avenue. 114 Westacre Road between Michigan Boulevard and West Capitol Avenue. 115 3rd Street between B Street and West Capitol Avenue. 118 15th Street between Jefferson Boulevard and South River Road.

City's
Index
#
Road Segment Name
Current
Posted Speed
Limit (mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
4 C Street between 5th Street and City Limit. 25 30
5 Carlin Drive between Oates Drive and Ramco Street. 30 35 11 Davis Road between Seymour Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard. 25 30 20 Evergreen Avenue between Pine Street and Harbor Boulevard. 25 30 21 Evergreen Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Coke Street. 25 30 33 Harmon Road between Jefferson Boulevard and Antioch Avenue. 40 30 70 Northport Drive between Commerce Drive and West Capitol Avenue. 25 30 72 Oates Street between Carlin Drive and Ramos Drive. 25 30 77 Port Street between Shore Street and Terminal Street. 25 30 78 Promenade Way between Ramos Drive and Golden Gate Drive. 30 30 80 Ramos Drive between Oates Street and Promenade Street. 25 30 104 Sutter Street between West Capitol Avenue and North End. n/a 25 118 15th Street between Jefferson Boulevard and South River Road. 25 30 DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 92 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 2
Final Report
Certification
This report includes the engineering and traffic surveys of speed limits within the City West Sacramento. The existing posted speed limits were reviewed for compliance with California Vehicle Code, Section 40802, which requires the preparation of engineering and traffic surveys for road segments with enforcement by radar or other electronic devices. The following reference materials were also used in the preparation of this report:

1. California Vehicle Code (CVC) – As of January 1, 2021.

2. California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD, 2014, Revision 6, effective 03/30/2021) – State of California, Department of Transportation, Sacramento, California.

All data utilized in this report is on file in the Capital Projects and Transportation Department, City of West Sacramento, 1110 West Capitol Avenue, West Sacramento, CA 95691.

The firms of Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. and Advanced Mobility Group, Inc. on behalf of the City of West Sacramento, have prepared this document.

I, Ravi Narayanan, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of West Sacramento, and this report was prepared under my supervision. This report’s contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
02/15/2023
___________________________
Ravi Narayanan, P.E., T.E.

Registered Civil Engineer 64326
Registered Traffic Engineer 2401
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 93 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 3
Final Report
1 Introduction
The City of West Sacramento, Capital Projects and Transportation Department is undertaking studies for the update of Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) for multiple roadway segments throughout the City. The purpose and intent of this E&TS is to review and update existing posted speed limits in accordance with traffic engineering practices based on the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), Revision 6, and the California Vehicle Code (CVC Section 40802).

Figure 1 illustrates the location of the study segments on a Citywide map, and also indicates the existing roadway classification and current posted speed limits on these segments.

This report contains the following:
• Overview of statutory/regulatory requirements and relevant policies/guidelines that govern the need and requirements for the preparation of E&TS. • A brief overview of data methodologies used for collection, compilation and review/analysis of study data elements including, but not limited to, speed survey data, traffic count data and collision data.
• An E&TS summary sheet for study roadway segments that includes data summary as well as posted speed limit recommendation for the subject segment. • Technical Appendices that contain extracts of key regulatory document sections referenced in this study, as well as the raw or processed data used in the study.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 94 #02
#03
#05
#06
#08
#09
#11
#15
#16
#20 #21
#24
#25
#26
#27
#29
#33
#35
#37 #36
#47
#53
#55
#61
#64
#66 #67
#68
#70
#71
#72
#75
#76
#77
#78
#79
#80
#83
#87
#88
#118
#115
#114
#107
#106
#104
#102
#97
#94
#93
#95
#92
#76
#105
#79
#07
#01
#34
Legend:

Collector
Local Street
Low Access Control
Low-medium Access Control
Medium-high Access Control
City Segment Index Number
Existing Speed Limit
(As of March 2022)
Speed Surveys Study
City of West Sacramento
Map Source: City of West
Sacramento Public Access GIS Map
Citywide Speed Survey Locations Map
Figure 1
C:\Users\CHO90539\Desktop\Projects\City of West Sacramento\Speed Survey Locations.dwg #XX
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 95 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 5
Final Report
2 Study Purpose and Methodology

2.1 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
Traffic speed zone surveys should fulfill California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 22357 and 22358, which require local agencies to follow certain procedures established by Caltrans in establishing new speed limits and revising existing speed limits. Furthermore, CVC Section 40802 requires speed limits enforced by radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects to be evaluated on a recurring basis by an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) conforming to CVC Section 627. If the E&TS are more than five (5) years old, the speed zone is considered to be a “speed trap” under CVC Section 40802 and courts may reject evidence of speeding obtained through radar or other electronic devices.

E&TS may be up to seven (7) years old if conditions under CVC Section 40802(c)(1) related to enforcement training and equipment certification have been met.

On January 1, 2012, CVC 21400(b) became effective requiring the Department of Transportation (i.e. Caltrans) to revise the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD) so that speed limits are based on field-collected speed data. The procedure is built around a ‘spot speed’ survey that typically consists of measuring speeds with a calibrated radar gun or other electronic device of motor vehicles traveling at free-flow speeds in each direction on a two-way street. The most important data point collected is the “85th percentile speed”, also referred to as the “critical speed”, which is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the sampled motor vehicles travelled during the data collection period.

According to CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, paragraph 12a, the posted speed limit “shall be established at the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.” For example, a segment with an 85th percentile speed of 32 mph would have a rounded-down posted speed limit of 30 mph, while another segment with an 85th percentile speed of 33 mph would have a rounded-up posted speed limit of 35 mph. The CA-MUTCD allows the posted speed limit to be lowered by no more than 5 mph from a rounded speed, using one of two options that depend on whether the 85th percentile speed has been rounded down or up. The options may be applied as follows:
• Option 1: Option 1 within CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, paragraph 12a says “The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.” The cited CVC Section 627 defines an E&TS that is required to consider prevailing speeds, accident records, and conditions not readily apparent to the driver, and optionally consider residential density as well as pedestrian and bicycle safety. Note that the basis for a speed limit that is more than 5 mph lower than the 85th percentile speed is something other than prevailing speeds. In regards to conditions not readily apparent to the driver, CVC 22358 states that “physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning.”
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 96 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 6
Final Report
• Option 2: Option 2 within CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13 paragraph 12a says “For cases in which the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5-mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.” The Option 2 round-down, which became available when CVC Section 21400(b) went into effect January 1, 2012, requires no E&TS to post the speed limit sign. The E&TS is required nevertheless, however, to allow radar or similar devices to be used for enforcement.

Note again that consideration of accident data is a requirement for an E&TS as defined in CVC Section 627. However, CVC Section 21400(b) notes that in cases where Option 2 round-down is used, no further reduction in speed limit is allowed “for any reason”. Therefore, the prevailing collision data/rates based justification for speed limit decrease by 5 mph below the nearest 85th percentile speeds is only used with Option 1, and not with Option 2.

Although Option 1 could also be applied where recorded speeds are rounded up, Option 2 achieves the same reduced speed limit with lesser documentation requirements. According to the CA-MUTCD, Option 1’s documentation requirements consist of an E&TS that “shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.” The reduction must be based on considerations other than prevailing speeds, such as accident data, conditions not readily apparent to the driver, residential density, and pedestrian and bicycle safety. • According to CVC Section 22358.5, “conditions not readily apparent to the driver” exclude roadway width, curvature, grade, and surface conditions. Neither the CVC nor the CAMUTCD provide much specific guidance regarding accident data or pedestrian or bicycle safety. The CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, paragraph 34 notes however that “generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surfaces in collision histories.” Prevailing collision rates that are higher than statewide average rates for similar facilities are typically used as reasons to justify a recommended 5 mph speed limit reduction below 85th percentile speed, when Option 1 is used. • CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, paragraph 38 says “speed zones of less than 0.5 miles and short transition zones should be avoided.”
• For this study, an 85th percentile speed that coincided with a 5-mph increment was regarded as eligible for an Option 1 reduction, but not for an Option 2 round-down. • While the CA-MUTCD allows two options for lowering the posted speed limit, note that it offers no provision for raising the posted speed limit above the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed.

Residential Streets: CVC Section 22352(b)(1) defines prima facie speed limit as follows:

Twenty-five miles per hour (25 mph) on any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. CVC Section 627(c)(1) provides specific guidance on residential density. It may also be noted that many residential neighborhoods in the City of West Sacramento meet the density threshold of 16 separate dwelling houses or business structures per quarter mile of roadway frontage (both sides collectively). The statute does not apply to roadways within a business district. When residential density is considered per CVC Section 627(c)(1), judgment is applied as to whether a street lined with apartment buildings and condominiums should be considered a business district or a residential district. CVC DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 97 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 7
Final Report
Section 40802(b)(1) defines a “local street or road” as a facility that “primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions: (A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet, (B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length.

Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445, and (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.”
Appendix Exhibit A and Appendix Exhibit B contain the relevant CVC and CA-MUTCD sections respectively, that are referenced in this E&TS. Appendix Exhibit C contains a separate E&TS for each study segment.

2.2 Speed Data Collection
The radar speed surveys were conducted by National Data & Surveying (NDS) in accordance with California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) Regulations and CA-MUTCD guidance.

The speed surveys were conducted from March-May 2022. The CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, paragraph 27 provides guidance in the performance of speed data collection surveys i.e. field speed measurements, including the following:
• “The intent of the speed survey is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.” • “Speed measurements should be taken during off peak hours on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.”
The following general criteria and procedures were used in the speed data collection process:
• A representative number of ‘spot speeds’ were obtained by radar and recorded at each roadway location. The data was collected during ‘free flow’ (i.e. uncongested) periods, and a minimum of 100 samples in each direction of travel were taken for each highvolume location. For low-volume locations, the survey was conducted for a minimum of one hour or until at least 50 samples in each direction were obtained. Speed survey data was conducted on a typical weekday (Tuesday through Thursday). Known peak travel periods were generally avoided and note that data collection was conducted between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM or between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM only if free-flow or uncongested travel conditions occurred.
• All surveys were conducted in clear, dry weather and in normal traffic flow conditions (i.e. no accidents, detours, construction, etc.). The radar measurements were taken from a parked unmarked vehicle. A specific radar survey ‘spot’ on each roadway segment was chosen based on considerations such as – minimal influence by adjacent intersections or intersection controls, major driveways, crosswalks or railroad crossings, minimal visibility restrictions and no unusual physical constraints (such as parked vehicles, dips, curves, etc.) affecting traffic flow or speed.
• A sample of passing vehicles was randomly selected with careful attention to ensure that the sample represented the entire traffic stream. If several vehicles were in a platoon, only the speed of the first vehicle was recorded. All vehicles traveling at less than 40 DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 98 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 8
Final Report
mph speed and within 200 feet of the lead vehicle from the lead vehicle were considered to be in platoon. If vehicles were traveling at speeds greater than 40 mph, vehicles less than 350 feet from the lead vehicle were considered to be in platoon. • Radar units were certified and calibrated prior to use. NDS periodically checks their radar gun with a tuning fork to ensure that the device is calibrated and functioning properly. The calibration certificate for radar guns will be included with the final report. The NDS technicians that conducted the speed surveys are certified radar specialists. Data collection was repeated on different days for locations where the originally collected data was determined to be either erroneous or unreliable, or additional data was preferred for purposes of data confirmation/verification.

Appendix Exhibit D contains the radar ‘spot speed’ data collection summary in a graphical histogram format for each of the study segments. The reports include the following key data statistics:
• ‘Range’ refers to the range between the lowest and highest recorded speed in the sample.
• 50th percentile speed refers to the speed at or below which 50 percent of the sampled vehicles were traveling.
• 85th percentile speed refers to the speed at or below which 85 percent of the sampled vehicles were traveling.
• “10 mph pace speed range” refers to the 10 mph speed bandwidth within which the maximum proportion of sampled vehicles were traveling.

2.3 Traffic Count Data Collection
Vehicular traffic count volumes were also recorded by NDS at the study segments in MarchMay 2022. The data was collected using hoses or other machines, at approximately the same location where the spot speed surveys were conducted, and typically on the same day the speed surveys were conducted. Bi-directional vehicular traffic counts were recorded at 15-minute intervals continuously over a 24-hour typical weekday period, and summarized.

The recorded 24-hour traffic count total was then regarded as being representative of average daily traffic (ADT) demand conditions for the study segment for purposes of this study. Appendix Exhibit E contains the raw count data summary, and a graphical summary of the directional hourly volumes by time-of-day for each of the study segments.

The ADT data was mainly used for two purposes in this study:
• As inputs in the computation of actual current collision rates for those study segments where ‘detailed format’ E&TS report is requested.
• For purposes of comparison with relatively older/historical traffic counts (from 2013 through 2019) for the study segments as provided by the City.

The comparison of 2021 ADT data to older ADT data (if available) was completed primarily to obtain a high-level overview of daily traffic demand decreases that may have occurred in recent years and subsequent to the time the City may have last conducted speed surveys.

Note that traffic count data obtained in February-July 2021 may be regarded as “post CovidDocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 99 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 9
Final Report
19”
1 traffic count volumes. A comparative review of ADT counts between 2013 and 2022 indicated that traffic volumes have increased in many of the City’s arterial roadways evaluated in this study, however traffic volumes on residential collectors and downtown streets have either remained relatively unchanged or somewhat decreased. Note however that no special adjustments were made to the 2022 counts (or speed or collision data) used in this study to account for Covid-19 impacts, however additional caution was exercised in recommending speed limit changes, especially in situations where prevailing 85 th percentile
speeds were significantly higher than posted speed limits.

2.4 Collision Data Analysis
For segments for which ‘detailed’ format E&TS reports was requested by the City, collision data analysis was completed. For segments using ‘short’ format E&TS reports, note that the collision data was not requested or reviewed in this study.

Collision data from available most recent 3 years were obtained from two sources:
• City Police Department (PD) data as provided by City Public Works staff, • Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) collision data as extracted by Mott MacDonald consultant team.

The total number of collisions and the computed actual collision rates based on SWITRS data is included in the E&TS summary sheets. The SWITRS data based graphical summaries for all study segments are included in Appendix Exhibit F. The City PD datasheets are also included for reference. An “actual” i.e. prevailing collision rate was calculated for each study segment using the following formula:

Collision Rate = (N *1,000,000) / (ADT*L*D*Y)
• N = Total Number of collisions (midblock and intersection) within the study segment • Y = Total Number of years that the collision data was reported • ADT = Average Daily Traffic volume (vehicles per day) • L = Length of segment in miles
• D = Number of days in one year (365)
The actual rate (expressed in number of accidents per million vehicle miles per year) was compared to the “average” collision rate that may be reasonably expected to occur on roadways and highways with same/similar characteristics based on statewide data. The statewide average collision rates obtained from Caltrans are summarized in Table 1 for roadway types/cross-sections considered most similar to study facilities in the City of West Sacramento.
1 In September 2020, Mott MacDonald had high-level conversations with CA-MUTCD staff at Caltrans Headquarters, as well as Caltrans District 3 staff responsible for speed zones. The feedback received was that there are no specific Caltrans-issued policy or technical guidance on how speed surveys must be conducted or interpreted in the prevailing or post Covid-19 context, however additional technical caution (i.e. looking for significant changes in traffic volume demands, accident rates, etc. that may be reasonably attributable to Covid-19 conditions), and sound engineering judgment is recommended, especially in situations where the 85th percentile speeds are significantly greater than the posted speed limits.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 100
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 10
Final Report
Table 1: Statewide Average Accident Rates for Roadway Types

2.5 Field Reviews and ‘Floating Car’ Surveys
In order to evaluate ‘conditions not readily apparent to the driver’, a review of all surveyed roadway segments was conducted to document highway, traffic, and roadside conditions from both field visits and aerial/mapping reviews. These reviews included review of the following:
• Roadside conditions (both physical and functional)
• Type and density of adjacent land uses, including residential uses. • Multimodal safety and potential conflicts with pedestrians, bicyclists, and residential or business districts, and heavy vehicle traffic in industrial areas.

Furthermore, a California-registered Traffic Engineer conducted a field check of study roadway segments, which involved driving each roadway segment during the ‘off-peak’ weekday travel periods, while "floating" with surrounding traffic in order to determine the speed of traffic from the driver's viewpoint.

Roadway Type Average Collision Rate
(per Million Vehicle Miles)
Two/three-lane Arterial/Collector (Rural) 1.13
Two/three-lane Arterial/Collector (Urban) 1.46
Four (or more) lanes Undivided Arterial 1.24
Four (or more) lanes Divided Arterial 1.27
Source: 2018 Crash Data on California State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates) DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 101
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 11
Final Report
3 Data Summary & Recommendations

3.1 Data Summary
A written statement for each study roadway segment was prepared and included in Appendix Exhibit C. Each of these segment-specific statements are considered the E&TS report for the subject segment. Each segment’s E&TS report contains a summary listing of the following:
• A high-level schematic map indicating study segment location and limits • Field speed survey data, and speed data statistics
• Average daily traffic count data
• For segments for which ‘detailed’ format E&TS reports was requested by the City, collision data and computed actual collision rates, and comparison to statewide average accident rates for similar facilities were included. For segment using ‘short’ format E&TS reports, note that the collision data was not requested or reviewed. • A brief description of physical/roadside characteristics including adjacent land uses, number of lanes, roadway functional classification, traveled way widths, median types/characteristics, number/frequency of driveways and intersections, bike and pedestrian facilities, railroad crossings, and truck traffic. • Existing and recommended speed limits, and
• An explanation for the recommended speed limit.
• Certification
Table 2 shows a summary of roadway classifications, traffic count data and collision data summary for all study segments. Table 3 shows a summary of the E&TS data, findings and recommendations for all study segments.

3.2 Speed Limit Recommendations
For each study segment, a recommendation for posted speed limit was developed based on one of the following four scenarios that occurred:

1. Nearest 5-mph increment of 85
th percentile speed matched existing posted limit and
therefore no speed limit change is recommended.

2. A 5 mph reduction from the nearest 5-mph increment 85th percentile speed (justified based on ‘Option 1’ or ‘Option 2’) matched existing posted limit, and therefore no speed limit change is recommended.

3. A 5 mph reduction from the nearest 5-mph increment 85th percentile speed (justified based on ‘Option 1’ or ‘Option 2’) is greater than existing posted limit, and therefore a speed limit change is recommended.

4. For residential fronting local streets the existing prima facie speed limit of 25 mph is recommended to be retained per CVC Section 22352(b)(1), if the street meets residential density criteria per CVC Section 627(c)(1) and local street criteria per Section 40802(b)(1).

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 102
City's
Index
#
Road Segment Name Current General Plan Roadway
Classification Median Type Number of Lanes
Average
Daily Traffic
(2022)
Length
(mi)
Number of
Collisions
(SWITRS)
01/2018 -
12/2020
Acutal Accident
Rate (Acc/MVM)
(SWITRS Data)
Statewide
Average
Accident Data
(Acc/MVM)
1 Anna Street between Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive. Collector None, centerline only 2 2,279 0.7 2 Boatman Avenue between Industrial Boulevard and Terminal Street. Local None 2 575 0.2 3 Bryte Avenue between Riverbank Road and Sacramento Avenue. Collector None, centerline only 2 3,713 0.6 4 C Street between 5th Street and City Limit. Medium-High Access Control Arterial Two-way left-turn median lane 2 10,100 0.2 5 Carlin Drive between Oates Drive and Ramco Street. Low Access control Arterial Two-way left-turn median lane 2 4,254 0.5 6 Carrie Street between Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive. Collector None, centerline only 2 1,699 0.7 7 Cebrian Street between Del Monte Street and Stone Boulevard. Low Access control Arterial None, centerline only 2 2,144 0.4 8 Channel Drive between Seaport Boulevard and Channel Drive (westend). Local None, centerline only 2 1,718 1.5 9 Commerce Drive between West End and East End. Local None 2 228 0.3 11 Davis Road between Seymour Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard. Local None 2 158 0.3 15 Douglas Street between Lighthouse Drive and Sacramento Avenue. Collector None, centerline only 2 1,591 0.5 16 Duluth Street between Galveston Street and Harbor Boulevard. Local None 2 1,100 0.3 20 Evergreen Avenue between Pine Street and Harbor Boulevard. Low Access control Arterial None, centerline only 2 3,054 0.4 21 Evergreen Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Coke Street. Low Access control Arterial None, centerline only 2 5,159 0.3 24 Front Street between Shore Street and Terminal Street. Local None, centerline only 2 437 0.3 25 Galveston Street between Duluth Street and Houston Street. Local None, centerline only 2 727 0.3 26 Golden Gate Drive between Oakland Bay Drive and Promenade Street. Collector None, centerline only 2 710 0.5 27 Golden Gate Drive between Promenade Street and Marshall Road. Collector None, centerline only 2 2,270 0.7 29 Gregory Avenue between Bevan Road and South River Road. Collector None, centerline only 2 1,839 0.5 33 Harmon Road between Jefferson Boulevard and Antioch Avenue. Local None, centerline only 2 992 0.5 34 Hart Avenue between Allen Avenue and Higgins Road. Local None 2 327 0.3 35 Houston Street between West Capitol Avenue and Duluth Street. Local None 2 846 0.4 36 Higgins Road between Linden Road and Hart Avenue. Collector None, centerline only 2 1,291 0.3 37 Higgins Road Hart Ave. to Jefferson Blvd. Collector None, centerline only 2 1,438 0.4 42 Jefferson Boulevard between West Capitol Avenue and 15th Street. Medium-High Access Control Arterial Two-way left-turn lane 4 30,556 0.7 47 Jefferson Boulevard between Davis Road and Southport Parkway. Medium-High Access Control Arterial None, centerline only 2 4,245 1.1 55 Lighthouse Drive between Fountain Drive and Kegle Drive. Collector Raised Center Median 2 2,003 0.6 61 Maple Street between West Capitol Avenue and Michigan Boulevard. Local None, centerline only 2 1,044 0.2 64 Merkley Avenue between Sycamore Street and Westacre Road. Collector None 2 2,040 0.3 66 Michigan Boulevard between Pecan Street and Portsmouth Avenue Collector None, centerline only 2 561 0.9 10 18.09 1.46 67 Michigan Boulevard between Portsmouth Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard. Collector None, centerline only 2 2,535 0.2 10 18.01 1.46 68 North Harbor Boulevard between Riverbank Road and Reed Avenue. Low Access control Arterial None, centerline only 2 4,023 0.3 70 Northport Drive between Commerce Drive and West Capitol Avenue. Local None 2 1,004 0.3 71 Oakland Bay Drive between Southport Parkway and Golden Gate Drive (East) Local None, centerline only 2 1,200 0.2 72 Oates Street between Carlin Drive and Ramos Drive. Collector Two-way left-turn lane 2 1,377 0.3 75 Pine Street between West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen Avenue. Local None, centerline only 2 2,236 0.1 76 Poplar Street between Evergreen Avenue and Michigan Boulevard. Collector None 2 2,057 0.5 77 Port Street between Shore Street and Terminal Street. Local None, centerline only 2 1,548 0.3 78 Promenade Way between Ramos Drive and Golden Gate Drive. Collector Raised Center Median 4 4,715 0.4 79 Ramco Street between Southport Pkwy and South End Collector Two-way left-turn lane 2 1,336 0.8 80 Ramos Drive between Oates Street and Promenade Street. Local Two-way left-turn lane 2 591 0.1 83 Riverbank Road between North Harbor Road and Bryte Avenue. Collector None, centerline only 2 979 0.4 87 Seaport Boulevard between West End and Parkway Boulevard. Local None, centerline only 2 2,458 1.0 88 Shore Street between Front Street and Del Monte Street. Local None, centerline only 2 3,586 0.3 102 Stonegate Drive between Lake Washington Boulevard and Village Parkway. Collector None, centerline only 2 4,568 0.6 104 Sutter Street between West Capitol Avenue and North End. Local None 2 645 0.4 105 Sycamore Street between West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen Avenue. Collector None, centerline only 2 1,725 0.2 106 Terminal Street between Del Monte Street and Industrial Boulevard. Low Access control Arterial None, centerline only 2 3,355 0.3 107 Todhunter Avenue between Anna Street and Sacramento Avenue. Collector None, centerline only 2 3,497 0.4 114 Westacre Road between Michigan Boulevard and West Capitol Avenue. Local None, centerline only 2 1,717 0.2 23 61.17 1.46 115 3rd Street between B Street and West Capitol Avenue. Low Access control Arterial None, centerline only 2 2,296 0.9 118 15th Street between Jefferson Boulevard and South River Road. Low Access control Arterial None, centerline only 2 5,308 0.2 TABLE 2 - ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION, TRAFFIC COUNT AND COLLISION DATA SUMMARY Notes: SWITRS = Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 103
City's
Index
#
Road Segment Name Survey Date Survey Time Number
of Lanes
Length
(mi)
Posted
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Number
of Radar
Sample
Data
10 MPH
Pace
% in
Pace
50%
tile
Speed
(mph)
85% tile
Speed
(mph)
85% tile
Speed
(mph) -

ROUNDED
Applied
Option
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Speed
Limit
Change?
1 Anna Street between Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive. 3/2/2022 10:15-11:55 2 0.7 25 102 23-32 81% 28 32 30 1 25 NO 2 Boatman Avenue between Industrial Boulevard and Terminal Street. 3/9/2022 11:00-13:00 2 0.2 25 66 17-26 86% 21 25 25 25 NO 3 Bryte Avenue between Riverbank Road and Sacramento Avenue. 3/3/2022 12:45-13:55 2 0.6 25 103 24-33 82% 27 32 30 1 25 NO 4 C Street between 5th Street and City Limit. 3/8/2022 12:30-13:30 2 0.2 25 209 27-36 66% 31 37 35 1 30 YES 5 Carlin Drive between Oates Drive and Ramco Street. 3/9/2022 12:00-13:15 2 0.5 30 105 26-35 67% 31 39 40 2 35 YES 6 Carrie Street between Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive. 3/2/2022 13:15-14:15 2 0.7 25 100 22-31 83% 27 32 30 1 25 NO 7 Cebrian Street between Del Monte Street and Stone Boulevard. 3/8/2022 10:35-12:35 2 0.4 30 110 29-38 70% 32 37 35 1 30 NO 8 Channel Drive between Seaport Boulevard and Channel Drive (westend). 3/17/2022 14:30-16:00 2 1.5 35 107 27-36 63% 33 39 40 2 35 NO 9 Commerce Drive between West End and East End. 3/3/2022 11:00-13:00 2 0.3 25 39 17-26 69% 25 32 30 1 25 NO 11 Davis Road between Seymour Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard. 3/23/2022 9:30-11:30 2 0.3 25 22 27-36 64% 29 36 35 1 30 YES 15 Douglas Street between Lighthouse Drive and Sacramento Avenue. 3/8/2022 13:45-15:10 2 0.5 25 110 23-32 85% 28 32 30 1 25 NO 16 Duluth Street between Galveston Street and Harbor Boulevard. 3/3/2022 13:10-14:40 2 0.3 25 107 22-31 63% 25 31 30 1 25 NO 20 Evergreen Avenue between Pine Street and Harbor Boulevard. 3/10/2022 12:35-14:00 2 0.4 25 108 29-38 74% 33 37 35 1 30 YES 21 Evergreen Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Coke Street. 3/10/2022 11:05-12:30 2 0.3 25 127 24-33 76% 30 35 35 1 30 YES 24 Front Street between Shore Street and Terminal Street. 3/10/2022 9:00-11:00 2 0.3 25 37 22-31 81% 25 31 30 1 25 NO 25 Galveston Street between Duluth Street and Houston Street. 3/3/2022 9:00-11:00 2 0.3 25 100 23-32 73% 26 32 30 1 25 NO 26 Golden Gate Drive between Oakland Bay Drive and Promenade Street. 3/10/2022 9:10-11:10 2 0.5 30 39 25-34 85% 32 34 35 2 30 NO 27 Golden Gate Drive between Promenade Street and Marshall Road. 3/15/2022 10:30-11:45 2 0.7 30 102 28-37 80% 31 36 35 1 30 NO 29 Gregory Avenue between Bevan Road and South River Road. 3/10/2022 12:40-13:45 2 0.5 45 113 39-48 67% 43 49 50 2 45 NO 33 Harmon Road between Jefferson Boulevard and Antioch Avenue. 3/24/2022 11:35-13:35 2 0.5 40 25 20-29 60% 29 35 35 1 30 YES 34 Hart Avenue between Allen Avenue and Higgins Road. 3/24/2022 14:00-16:00 2 0.3 25 23 20-29 100% 25 26 25 25 NO 35 Houston Street between West Capitol Avenue and Duluth Street. 3/3/2022 11:10-12:55 2 0.4 25 104 22-31 79% 26 31 30 1 25 NO 36 Higgins Road between Linden Road and Hart Avenue. 3/24/2022 9:45-11:45 2 0.3 25 25 NO 37 Higgins Road Hart Ave. to Jefferson Blvd. 3/23/2022 12:00-14:00 2 0.4 25 105 23-32 76% 26 32 30 1 25 NO 42 Jefferson Boulevard between West Capitol Avenue and 15th Street. 3/17/2022 10:45-11:45 4 0.7 35 135 33-42 76% 38 42 40 1 35 NO 47 Jefferson Boulevard between Davis Road and Southport Parkway. 3/15/2022 11:25-12:30 2 1.1 55 102 49-58 66% 53 59 60 2 55 NO 55 Lighthouse Drive between Fountain Drive and Kegle Drive. 3/9/2022 10:25-12:10 2 0.6 25 117 21-30 79% 26 30 30 1 25 NO 61 Maple Street between West Capitol Avenue and Michigan Boulevard. 3/31/2022 12:20-14:20 2 0.2 25 87 17-26 86% 22 26 25 25 NO 64 Merkley Avenue between Sycamore Street and Westacre Road. 3/15/2022 12:10-13:30 2 0.3 25 116 20-29 77% 26 30 30 1 25 NO 66 Michigan Boulevard between Pecan Street and Portsmouth Avenue 3/3/2022 12:50-14:50 2 0.9 25 106 21-30 74% 27 31 30 1 25 NO 67 Michigan Boulevard between Portsmouth Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard. 3/9/2022 9:00-10:20 2 0.2 25 112 22-31 84% 27 31 30 1 25 NO 68 North Harbor Boulevard between Riverbank Road and Reed Avenue. 3/3/2022 14:30-15:30 2 0.3 45 110 34-43 57% 37 44 45 45 NO 70 Northport Drive between Commerce Drive and West Capitol Avenue. 3/3/2022 13:30-14:45 2 0.3 25 112 23-32 75% 27 34 35 2 30 YES 71 Oakland Bay Drive between Southport Parkway and Golden Gate Drive (East) 3/23/2022 11:55-13:55 2 0.2 35 115 29-38 82% 35 38 40 2 35 NO 72 Oates Street between Carlin Drive and Ramos Drive. 3/8/2022 11:05-13:05 2 0.3 25 100 28-37 68% 30 36 35 1 30 YES 75 Pine Street between West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen Avenue. 3/15/2022 10:30-12:30 2 0.1 25 85 19-28 76% 24 28 30 2 25 NO 76 Poplar Street between Evergreen Avenue and Michigan Boulevard. 3/16/2022 12:25-14:45 2 0.5 25 112 22-31 90% 26 29 30 2 25 NO 77 Port Street between Shore Street and Terminal Street. 3/9/2022 9:00-11:00 2 0.3 25 97 22-31 74% 27 33 35 1 30 YES 78 Promenade Way between Ramos Drive and Golden Gate Drive. 3/10/2022 11:15-12:25 4 0.4 30 109 27-36 77% 31 35 35 1 30 NO 79 Ramco Street between Southport Pkwy and South End 3/15/2022 14:00-15:00 2 0.8 35 111 35-44 77% 38 42 40 1 35 NO 80 Ramos Drive between Oates Street and Promenade Street. 3/8/2022 9:00-11:00 2 0.1 25 81 25-34 63% 29 34 35 2 30 YES 83 Riverbank Road between North Harbor Road and Bryte Avenue. 3/3/2022 9:15-11:15 2 0.4 25 70 23-32 87% 28 31 30 1 25 NO 87 Seaport Boulevard between West End and Parkway Boulevard. 3/15/2022 15:15-16:15 2 1.0 35 128 33-42 66% 37 42 40 1 35 NO 88 Shore Street between Front Street and Del Monte Street. 3/9/2022 13:15-15:15 2 0.3 30 108 24-33 69% 29 34 35 2 30 NO 102 Stonegate Drive between Lake Washington Boulevard and Village Parkway. 3/10/2022 10:30-11:30 2 0.6 35 141 31-40 74% 36 41 40 1 35 NO 104 Sutter Street between West Capitol Avenue and North End. 3/8/2022 10:10-12:10 2 0.4 n/a 81 11-(20) 99% 16 18 20 25 YES 105 Sycamore Street between West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen Avenue. 3/9/2022 10:30-11:45 2 0.2 25 118 20-29 80% 25 30 30 1 25 NO 106 Terminal Street between Del Monte Street and Industrial Boulevard. 3/8/2022 9:00-10:20 2 0.3 30 111 22-31 59% 28 35 35 1 30 NO 107 Todhunter Avenue between Anna Street and Sacramento Avenue. 3/2/2022 14:25-15:35 2 0.4 25 103 21-30 88% 26 29 30 2 25 NO 114 Westacre Road between Michigan Boulevard and West Capitol Avenue. 3/2/2022 9:00-10:30 2 0.2 25 103 20-29 88% 25 28 30 2 25 NO 115 3rd Street between B Street and West Capitol Avenue. 3/23/2022 10:40-12:05 2 0.9 25 51 19-28 80% 23 28 30 2 25 NO 118 15th Street between Jefferson Boulevard and South River Road. 3/18/2022 12:00-13:00 2 0.2 25 162 27-36 81% 32 36 35 1 30 YES Residential Street, prima facie speed limit retained
Notes: "Applied Option" refers to CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13 defined Options 1 and 2, as described in Report Section 2.1.

TABLE 3 - Engineering and Traffic Surveys Summary
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 104
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 14
Final Report
Table 4 summarizes the segment speed limit recommendations from this study.

Table 4: Summary of Speed Limit Recommendations
City's
Index
#
Road Segment Name
Current
Posted
Speed Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Speed
Limit
Change?
1 Anna Street between Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive. 25 25 NO 2 Boatman Avenue between Industrial Boulevard and Terminal Street. 25 25 NO 3 Bryte Avenue between Riverbank Road and Sacramento Avenue. 25 25 NO 4 C Street between 5th Street and City Limit. 25 30 YES 5 Carlin Drive between Oates Drive and Ramco Street. 30 35 YES 6 Carrie Street between Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive. 25 25 NO 7 Cebrian Street between Del Monte Street and Stone Boulevard. 30 30 NO 8 Channel Drive between Seaport Boulevard and Channel Drive (westend). 35 35 NO 9 Commerce Drive between West End and East End. 25 25 NO 11 Davis Road between Seymour Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard. 25 30 YES 15 Douglas Street between Lighthouse Drive and Sacramento Avenue. 25 25 NO 16 Duluth Street between Galveston Street and Harbor Boulevard. 25 25 NO 20 Evergreen Avenue between Pine Street and Harbor Boulevard. 25 30 YES 21 Evergreen Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Coke Street. 25 30 YES 24 Front Street between Shore Street and Terminal Street. 25 25 NO 25 Galveston Street between Duluth Street and Houston Street. 25 25 NO 26 Golden Gate Drive between Oakland Bay Drive and Promenade Street. 30 30 NO 27 Golden Gate Drive between Promenade Street and Marshall Road. 30 30 NO 29 Gregory Avenue between Bevan Road and South River Road. 45 45 NO 33 Harmon Road between Jefferson Boulevard and Antioch Avenue. 40 30 YES 34 Hart Avenue between Allen Avenue and Higgins Road. 25 25 NO 35 Houston Street between West Capitol Avenue and Duluth Street. 25 25 NO 36 Higgins Road between Linden Road and Hart Avenue. 25 25 NO 37 Higgins Road Hart Ave. to Jefferson Blvd. 25 25 NO
42 Jefferson Boulevard between West Capitol Avenue and 15th Street. 35 35 NO 47 Jefferson Boulevard between Davis Road and Southport Parkway. 55 55 NO 55 Lighthouse Drive between Fountain Drive and Kegle Drive. 25 25 NO 61 Maple Street between West Capitol Avenue and Michigan Boulevard. 25 25 NO 64 Merkley Avenue between Sycamore Street and Westacre Road. 25 25 NO 66 Michigan Boulevard between Pecan Street and Portsmouth Avenue 25 25 NO 67 Michigan Boulevard between Portsmouth Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard. 25 25 NO 68 North Harbor Boulevard between Riverbank Road and Reed Avenue. 45 45 NO 70 Northport Drive between Commerce Drive and West Capitol Avenue. 25 30 YES 71 Oakland Bay Drive between Southport Parkway and Golden Gate Drive (East) 35 35 NO 72 Oates Street between Carlin Drive and Ramos Drive. 25 30 YES 75 Pine Street between West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen Avenue. 25 25 NO 76 Poplar Street between Evergreen Avenue and Michigan Boulevard. 25 25 NO 77 Port Street between Shore Street and Terminal Street. 25 30 YES 78 Promenade Way between Ramos Drive and Golden Gate Drive. 30 30 NO 79 Ramco Street between Southport Pkwy and South End 35 35 NO 80 Ramos Drive between Oates Street and Promenade Street. 25 30 YES 83 Riverbank Road between North Harbor Road and Bryte Avenue. 25 25 NO 87 Seaport Boulevard between West End and Parkway Boulevard. 35 35 NO 88 Shore Street between Front Street and Del Monte Street. 30 30 NO 102 Stonegate Drive between Lake Washington Boulevard and Village Parkway. 35 35 NO 104 Sutter Street between West Capitol Avenue and North End. n/a 25 YES 105 Sycamore Street between West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen Avenue. 25 25 NO 106 Terminal Street between Del Monte Street and Industrial Boulevard. 30 30 NO 107 Todhunter Avenue between Anna Street and Sacramento Avenue. 25 25 NO 114 Westacre Road between Michigan Boulevard and West Capitol Avenue. 25 25 NO 115 3rd Street between B Street and West Capitol Avenue. 25 25 NO 118 15th Street between Jefferson Boulevard and South River Road. 25 30 YES DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 105
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 15
Final Report
Appendix
Appendix Exhibit A – Applicable CVC Sections
Appendix Exhibit B – 2014 CA-MUTCD, Revision 6, Section 2B.13 Appendix Exhibit C – E&TS summary sheets
Appendix Exhibit D – Spot Speed Studies
Appendix Exhibit E – 24-Hour Traffic Volume Counts & Distribution Appendix Exhibit F – Collision Data Summary
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 106

APPENDIX EXHIBIT A

APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE (CVC) SECTIONS

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY DEFINED
627. (a) "Engineering and traffic survey," as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. (B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B). (2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

Amended Sec. 1, Ch. 45, Stats. 2000. Effective January 1, 2001.

MUTCD AND SPEED LIMITS
21400 (b) The Department of Transportation shall revise the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on January 1, 2012, to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic.

However, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment, but then the Department of Transportation or a local authority shall not reduce the speed limit any further for any reason.

Amended by Stats. 2011, Ch. 528, Sec. 2. Effective January 1, 2012.

BASIC SPEED LAW
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Amended Ch. 252, Stats. 1963. Effective September 20, 1963.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 107

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS
22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
(1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
(2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
(3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
(1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. (2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority is not required to erect any sign pursuant to this paragraph until donations from private sources covering those costs are received and the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may, however, utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs.

Added Sec. 1, Ch. 420, Stats. 2013. Effective January 1, 2014. 22357.(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 108
(Repealed (in Sec. 28) and added by Stats. 1995, Ch. 766, Sec. 29. Effective January 1, 1996. This section became operative, by its own provisions, on the date described in Section 22366.) DECREASE NEAR CHILDREN’S PLAYSGROUNDS
22357.1. Notwithstanding Section 22357, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, set a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on any street, other than a state highway, adjacent to any children's playground in a public park but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use the facilities. The 25 miles per hour speed limit shall be effective when signs giving notice of the speed limit are posted. Added Ch. 508, Stats. 1989. Effective January 1, 1990. 22358. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, or 25 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366. (Repealed (in Sec. 30) and added by Stats. 1995, Ch. 766, Sec. 31. Effective January 1, 1996. This section became operative, by its own provisions, on the date described in Section 22366.)

DECREASE ON NARROW STREET
22358.3. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

Amended Ch. 1095, Stats. 1972. Effective March 7, 1973. Supersedes Ch. 372. 22358.4. (a) (1) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey.
(2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 109
leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the school zone.
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration.
(5) (A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (B) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from the school grounds.
(D) A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs incurred by the department under this subdivision.
(Amended by Stats. 2007, Ch. 384, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2008.)

DECREASE OF LOCAL LIMITS NEAR SCHOOLS OR SENIOR CENTERS 22358.4. (a) (1) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey.
(2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 110
ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the school zone.
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration.
(5) (A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (C) For purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from the school grounds.
(D) A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs incurred by the department under this subdivision.

Amended Sec. 1, Ch. 384, Stats. 2007. Effective January 1, 2008.

DOWNWARD SPEED ZONING
22358.5. It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 111
would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

Added Ch. 11, Stats. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959.

SPEED TRAPS
40802. (a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of transportation. When a street or road does not appear on the “California Road System Maps,” it may be defined as a “Local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section "school zone" means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone" also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. (c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear; the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D).
(ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 112
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility. (2) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B) (i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 10 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.

Amended Sec. 49, Ch. 491, Stats. 2010. Effective January 1, 2011.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 113
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 114
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 115
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 116
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 117
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 118
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 119
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 120
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 121
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 122
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 123
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 124
Appendix C
Engineering & Traffic Surveys
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 125

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Anna Street City Index Number: 1
Survey Limits: Between Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive
Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/2/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 10:15 AM-11:55 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 102
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 32 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 28 MPH Pace Speed: 23 MPH To 32 MPH
In Pace: 81.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 2,279
Length of Segment (In Feet): 3,696
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None, Centerline only Roadway Width: 40' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a primarily single family residential neighborhood with schools, parks, a church, etc. The fronting residential properties and schools have driveway access to the street. 5' wide sidewalks are present in both directions. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 40' wide, two-lane collector street and centerline divider. Eight unsignalized intersections through the segment; three are allway stop-controlled, five are midblock T-intersections. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PST
126

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Boatman Avenue City Index Number: 2
Survey Limits: between Industrial Boulevard and Terminal Street.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/9/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 11:00 AM-1:00 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 66
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 21 MPH Pace Speed: 17 MPH To 26 MPH
In Pace: 86.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 575
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,056
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None
Roadway Width: 44' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: Segment is in a commercial and industrial area; street lined with large warehouses, restaurants, and driveways for large truck accessibility. Property setbacks are approximately 25 feet from the edge of the roadway. A 5' wide sidewalk is present in both direction. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: The existing speed limit matches the 85th percentile speed. No speed limt change recommended.

Roadway Geometrics: 44' wide, two-lane local street, and no centerline divider. Two unsignalized T-intersections at each end of the corridor. Bike lanes are not present.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
Capital Improvement Manager
127

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Bryte Avenue City Index Number: 3
Survey Limits: Between Riverbank Road and Sacramento Avenue Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/3/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 12:45 PM-1:55 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 103
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 32 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 27 MPH Pace Speed: 24 MPH To 33 MPH
In Pace: 82.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 3,713
Length of Segment (In Feet): 3,168
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 40' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area and school. Large lot single-family homes and park fronting the roadway, all with driveways with direct street access. 5' wide sidewalks are present in both directions. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 40' wide, two-lane collector street, and double yellow centerline divider. Seven unsignalized intersections; two are all-way stopcontrolled, five are T-intersections. There are no bike lanes present. Corridor contains four signalized intersections.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
128

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: C Street City Index Number: 4
Survey Limits: between 5th Street and City Limit.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/8/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 12:30 PM-1:30 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 209
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 37 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 31 MPH Pace Speed: 27 MPH To 36 MPH
In Pace: 66.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 10,100
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,056
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type:

Medium-High Access Control
Arterial Center Divider: Two-way left-turn median lane
Roadway Width: 55' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? YES
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a mixed residential/commercial district. Large lot single-family homes, parking lots, and restaurants are present along corridor, all with driveways with street access. 5' wide sidewalks are present in both directions. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 35 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (bike/pedestrian considerations). Recommendation is to revise the posted speed limit to 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 55' wide, Medium-High access control arterial road and two-way-left-turn-lane striped median divider. Four unsignalized intersections exist through the corridor; three are all-way stop-controlled and one is a T-intersection. No bike lanes are present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
129

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Carlin Drive City Index Number: 5
Survey Limits: Between Oates Drive and Ramco Street
Direction of Travel: Eastbound/Westbound
Survey Date: 3/9/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 12:00 PM-1:15 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 105
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 39 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 31 MPH Pace Speed: 26 MPH To 35 MPH
In Pace: 67.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 30 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 4,254
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,640
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Low Access Control Arterial Center Divider: Median two-way-left-turn lane Roadway Width: 55' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? YES
Existing Speed Limit: 30 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: Segment is in an industrial-zoned area; street lined with large warehouses and wide driveways for large truck accessibility.

Adjacent businesses include truck hauling and logistics. Property setbacks are approximately 20 feet from edge of roadway. Only north sidewalk is present.

Comments: The nearest increment of 85th percentile speed is 40 mph. Per Option 2 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014, round-down of reported 85th percentile speed to nearest 5-mph increment is supportable, if no further reduction is taken. Recommendation is to revise the posted speed limit to 35 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 55' wide low access control arterial and TWLTL Striped Median. 7' bike lane is present in the westbound direction. Corridor contains one major signalized intersection and two T-intersections at the ends of the corridor.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
130

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Carrie Street City Index Number: 6
Survey Limits: between Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/2/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 1:15 PM-2:15 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 100
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 32 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 27 MPH Pace Speed: 22 MPH To 31 MPH
In Pace: 83.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,699
Length of Segment (In Feet): 3,696
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None, Centerline only Roadway Width: 40' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 6/08/2021
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a primarily single family residential neighborhood with schools, churches and parks. The fronting residential properties and schools have driveways with direct street access. 5' wide sidewalks are present in both directions. On-street parking is allowed. Intermitted speed bumps are present along the corridor.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 40' wide, two-lane collector street, and centerline divider. Seven unsignalized intersections throughout the corridor; four are allway stop-controlled, and three are T-intersections. Sidewalks are present in both directions while bike lanes are not.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM P
Capital Improvement Manager
131

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Cebrian Street City Index Number: 7
Survey Limits: between Del Monte Street and Stone Boulevard.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/8/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 10:35 AM-12-35 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 110
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 37 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 32 MPH Pace Speed: 29 MPH To 38 MPH
In Pace: 70.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 30 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 2,144
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,112
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Low Access control Arterial Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 57' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 30 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and wide driveways for large truck accessibility. Adjacent businesses include truck hauling and logistics. Property setbacks are approximately 20 feet from the edge of the roadway. No sidewalk is present in either direction. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 35 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (parking and bike/pedestrian considerations). Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 57' wide, low access control arterial, and striped double-yellow centerline. Corridor contains one all-way-stop-controlled intersection at the south end. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
132

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Channel Drive City Index Number: 8
Survey Limits: between Seaport Boulevard and Channel Drive (westend).

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/17/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 2:30 PM-4:00 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 107
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 39 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 33 MPH Pace Speed: 27 MPH To 36 MPH
In Pace: 63.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,718
Length of Segment (In Feet): 7,920
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None
Roadway Width: 50' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 6/08/2021
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: Segment is in an industrial-zoned area; street lined with large warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility. Property setbacks are approximately 20' feet from edge of roadway. No sidewalk is present in either direction. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Per Option 2 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014, round-down of reported 85th percentile speed to nearest 5-mph increment is supportable, if no further reduction is taken. Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 50' wide, two-lane local street, and centerline divider. Three unsignalized T-intersections are present the corridor; no major midblock intersections. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
133

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Commerce Drive City Index Number: 9
Survey Limits: between West End and East End.

Direction of Travel: WestBound/EastBound
Survey Date: 3/3/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 11:00 AM -1:00 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 39
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 32 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 25 MPH Pace Speed: 17 MPH To 26 MPH
In Pace: 69.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 228
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None
Roadway Width: 50' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; the street is lined with large warehouses with wide driveways for large truck accessibility. Property setbacks are approximately 25 feet from the edge of the roadway. Sidewalks are present along both directions. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (parking, and bike/pedestrian considerations). Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 50' wide local road without a centerline. Corridor contains cul-de-sacs at both ends and one T-intersection. Corridor does not contain bike lanes in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
Capital Improvement Manager
134

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Davis Road City Index Number: 11
Survey Limits: between Seymour Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Northbound
Survey Date: 3/23/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 9:30 AM-11:30 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 22
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 36 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 29 MPH Pace Speed: 27 MPH To 36 MPH
In Pace: 64.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 158
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None
Roadway Width: 20' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? YES
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: Segment runs through a rural residential area. Property setbacks are at least 35' from edge of pavement. Large lot single family homes fronting the roadway, rural residential densities not sufficient to consider the road "residential street" per CVC criteria. Fronting residential properties have driveways with street access. No curbs or sidewalks present along both directions. Low ADT demand.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 35 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (bike/pedestrian considerations). Recommendation is to revise posted speed limit to 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 20' wide, two-lane local street, with three unsignalized intersections through the segment - one is all-way stop-controlled, and the rest are T-intersections. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PST
135

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Douglas Street City Index Number: 15
Survey Limits: between Lighthouse Drive and Sacramento Avenue.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/8/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 1:45 PM-3:10 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 110
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 32 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 28 MPH Pace Speed: 23 MPH To 32 MPH
In Pace: 85.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,591
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,640
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None
Roadway Width: 35' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area, with several single-family homes fronting the roadway. Fronting residential properties have driveways with direct street access. A 5' sidewalk is present in both directions. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 35' wide, low access control arterial street, and striped double-yellow centerline. Seven unsignalized intersections throughout the corridor; five are all-way stop-controlled, two are T-intersections. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
Capital Improvement Manager
136

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Duluth Street City Index Number: 16
Survey Limits: between Galveston Street and Harbor Boulevard Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/3/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 1:10 PM-2:40 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 107
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 31 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 25 MPH Pace Speed: 22 MPH To 31 MPH
In Pace: 63.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,100
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None
Roadway Width: 29' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility.

Property setbacks are approximately 25 feet from the edge of the roadway. Both sidewalks are present. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (parking, and bike/pedestrian considerations). Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 25' wide local roadway, with one signalized and one unsignalized T-intersection through the segment. No bike lane is present.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM P
137

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Evergreen Avenue City Index Number: 20 Survey Limits: between Pine Street and Harbor Boulevard.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Northbound
Survey Date: 3/10/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 12:35 PM-2:00 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 108
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 37 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 33 MPH Pace Speed: 29 MPH To 38 MPH
In Pace: 74.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 3,054
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,112
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Low Access Control Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 42' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? YES
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility.

Property setbacks are approximately 13 feet from the edge of the roadway. Intermittent sidewalk is present along north curb. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 35 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (parking, and bike/pedestrian considerations). Recommendation is to revise posted speed limit to 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 42' wide road with low access control arterial, with a striped double-yellow centerline. No bike lane is present.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
138

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Evergreen Avenue City Index Number: 21 Survey Limits: between Harbor Boulevard and Coke Street.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/10/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 11:05 AM-12:30 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 127
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 30 MPH Pace Speed: 24 MPH To 33 MPH
In Pace: 76.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 5,159
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Low Access control Arterial Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 44' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? YES
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility.

Adjacent businesses include truck hauling and logistics, hotels and gas stations. Property setbacks are approximately 25 feet from the edge of the roadway. Only one sidewalk is present. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 35 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, parking, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to revise posted speed limit to 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 44' wide road with low access control arterial and centerline only as a divider. One contains four signalized intersections at the Harbor Blvd and T-section intersections in Coke St. No bike lanes are present.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM P
139

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Front Street City Index Number: 24
Survey Limits: between Shore Street and Terminal Street.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/10/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 9:00 AM-11:00 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 37
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 31 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 25 MPH Pace Speed: 22 MPH To 31 MPH
In Pace: 81.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 437
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 36' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility.

Property setbacks are approximately 20 feet from the edge of the roadway. No sidewalk are present in either direction. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, parking, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 36' wide, two-lane local street, and centerline divider. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
Capital Improvement Manager
140

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Galveston Street City Index Number: 25 Survey Limits: between Duluth Street and Houston Street Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/3/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 9:00 AM-11:00 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 100
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 31 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 26 MPH Pace Speed: 23 MPH To 32 MPH
In Pace: 73.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 727
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 42' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility.

Property setbacks are approximately 10 feet from the edge of the roadway. No sidewalk is present. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, parking and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 42' wide local roadway and a centerline only as a divider. No bike lanes are present.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
141

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Golden Gate Drive City Index Number: 26 Survey Limits: Oakland Bay Drive and Promenade Street
Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/10/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 9:10 AM-11:10 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 39
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 34 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 32 MPH Pace Speed: 25 MPH To 34 MPH
In Pace: 85.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 30 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 710
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,640
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 36' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 30 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area, however there is no direct residential driveway access to the roadway since the roadway functions as a collector street. 5' wide separated sidewalks are present in both directions. On-street parking may be allowed.

Comments: Per Option 2 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014, round-down of reported 85th percentile speed to nearest 5-mph increment is supportable, if no further reduction is taken. Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 36' wide, two-lane collector street, and striped, double-yellow centerline. Eight unsignalized intersections through the segment, four are all-way stop-controlled, and four are T-intersections. Bike lanes are present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM P
142

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Golden Gate Drive City Index Number: 27 Survey Limits: between Promenade Street and Marshall Road Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/15/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 10:30 AM-11:45 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 102
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 36 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 31 MPH Pace Speed: 28 MPH To 37 MPH
In Pace: 80.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 30 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 2,270
Length of Segment (In Feet): 3,696
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 36' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 30 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 6/08/2021
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area, however there is no direct residential driveway access to the roadway since the roadway functions as a collector street. 5' wide separated sidewalks are present in both directions. On-street parking may be allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 35 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (bike/pedestrian considerations). Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 36' wide, two-lane collector street, and striped, double-yellow centerline. There are twelve unsignalized intersections through the segment, one is all-way stop-controlled, and eleven are T-intersections. 4' wide bike lanes are present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
143

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Gregory Avenue City Index Number: 29
Survey Limits: Bevan Road and South River Road
Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/10/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 12:40 PM-1:45 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 113
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 49 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 43 MPH Pace Speed: 35 MPH To 52 MPH
In Pace: 67.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 45 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,839
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,640
D. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 31' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 45 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 45 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a rural residential area. Large lot single-family homes and parks front the roadway. Fronting residential properties have driveways with street access. No sidewalks are present in either direction.

Comments: Per Option 2 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014, round-down of reported 85th percentile speed to nearest 5-mph increment is supportable, if no further reduction is taken. Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 45 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 31' wide, two-lane local street with shoulders and centerline line divider. Three unsignalized intersections are present in the corridor; one is a mid-block all-way stop-controlled intersection, and two are T-intersections at the ends of the corridor. Sidewalks are not presented in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM P
144

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Harmon Road City Index Number: 33
Survey Limits: between Jefferson Boulevard and Antioch Avenue.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/24/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 11:35 AM-1:35 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 25
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 29 MPH Pace Speed: 20 MPH To 29 MPH
In Pace: 60.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 40 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 992
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,640
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 22' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? YES
Existing Speed Limit: 40 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 02/14/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a rural/residential area. Large lot single-family homes front the roadway. Fronting residential properties have driveways with street access. Low frequency of driveways. No sidewalks are present in either direction.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 35 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to revise the posted speed limit to 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 22' wide traveled way, two-lane local street, with striped double yellow centerline. Six unsignalized intersections: one all-way stop-controlled, five T-intersections. No bike lanes are present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
Capital Improvement Manager
145

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Hart Avenue City Index Number: 34
Survey Limits: between Allen Avenue and Higgins Road.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/24/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 2:00 PM-4:00 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 23
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 26 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 25 MPH Pace Speed: 20 MPH To 29 MPH
In Pace: 100.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 327
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None
Roadway Width: 20' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a rural residential area. Large lot single-family homes front the roadway. Fronting residential properties have driveways with street access. No sidewalks are present in both directions.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 25 mph. Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 20' wide with shoulders, two-lane local street, and no centerline. Two unsignalized all-way stop-controlled intersections located at the ends of the corridor. No bike lanes are present in either directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
146

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Houston Street City Index Number: 35
Survey Limits: between West Capitol Avenue and Duluth Street Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/3/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 11:10 AM-12:55 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 104
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 31 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 26 MPH Pace Speed: 22 MPH To 31 MPH
In Pace: 79.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 846
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,112
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 32' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and wide driveways for large truck accessibility. High frequency of driveways with direct street access. Property setbacks are approximately 20 feet from the edge of the roadway. Sidewalks are not present on either side; on-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, parking and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: A 32' wide local road with dashed yellow centerine. Bike lanes are not present. Corridor begins and ends at T-intersections, with another unsignalized T intersection in the middle of the corridor.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM P
147

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Higgins Road City Index Number: 36
Survey Limits: between Linden Road and Hart Avenue.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/24/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 9:45 AM-11:45 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 103
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 33 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 29 MPH Pace Speed: 23 MPH To 32 MPH
In Pace: 76.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,291
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
D. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 37' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area. Single-family homes front the roadway. Fronting residential properties have driveways with direct street access. 5' wide sidewalks are present in both directions, on-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Meets CVC and CA-MUTCD "Residential Street" criteria, retain prima facie speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 37' wide, two-lane collector street, and a double yellow centerline. Six unsignalized intersections, two are all-way stopcontrolled, and four are T-intersections. Bike lanes are not presented in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
148

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Higgins Road City Index Number: 37
Survey Limits: Hart Ave. to Jefferson Blvd.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/24/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 12:00 AM-2:00 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 105
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 32 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 26 MPH Pace Speed: 23 MPH To 32 MPH
In Pace: 76.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,438
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,112
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 32' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 6/08/2021
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area. Single-family homes front the roadway. Fronting residential properties have driveways with street access. 5' wide sidewalk present in north side and on-street parking is allowed on north side.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, parking and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 32' wide, two-lane collector street, and a double yellow centerline divider with mid-block left-turn pockets, four unsignalized intersections, one is all-way stop-controlled, and three are T-intersections. Bike lanes are not present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
149

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Jefferson Boulevard City Index Number: 42 Survey Limits: between West Capitol Avenue and 15th Street.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/17/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 10:45 AM-11:45 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 135
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 42 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 38 MPH Pace Speed: 33 MPH To 42 MPH
In Pace: 76.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 30,556
Length of Segment (In Feet): 3,696
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type:

Medium-High Access Control
Arterial Center Divider: TWLTL Striped Median
Roadway Width: 85' # of lanes: 4
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is fronted by commercial properties, with businesses that include banks, auto parts stores, and gas stations.

There are many properties with driveways that have direct street access. 5' wide sidewalks exist in both directions. On-street parking may not be allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 40 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: An 85' wide arterial roadway with a two-way-left-turn-lane median as a divider. A 7' wide southbound bike lane. Corridor contain four signalized intersections and four unsignalized intersections; two are all-way stop-controlled, and two are T-intersections.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
150

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Jefferson Boulevard City Index Number: 47 Survey Limits: between Davis Road and Southport Parkway.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/15/2022 Survey Day: Tuesdasy
Survey Time: 11:25 AM-12:30 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 102
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 59 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 53 MPH Pace Speed: 49 MPH To 58 MPH
In Pace: 66.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 55 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 4,245
Length of Segment (In Feet): 5,808
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type:

Medium-High Access Control
Arterial Center Divider: None, centerline only
Roadway Width: 28' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 55 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 55 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 6/08/2021
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is a high-speed arterial that runs through a residential-agricultural zoned rural area in the south end of the City.

No fronting property driveway access. No bike lanes or parking.

Comments: The nearest 5 mph increment of 85th percentile speed is 60 mph. Per Option 2 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014, round-down of reported 85th percentile speed to nearest 5-mph increment is supportable, if no further reduction is taken. Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 55 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 28' wide traveled way, medium-high access control arterial with a centerline only as a divider. No shoulders or bike lanes are present. Three unsignalized intersections; one is all-way stop-controlled, and two are T-intersections.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
151

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Lighthouse Drive City Index Number: 55 Survey Limits: between Fountain Drive and Kegle Drive
Direction of Travel: EastBound/Westbound
Survey Date: 3/9/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 10:25-12:10 Field Observer:

A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 117
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 26 MPH Pace Speed: 21 MPH To 31 MPH
In Pace: 79.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 2,003
Length of Segment (In Feet): 3,168
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: Raised Center Median Roadway Width: 60' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area. Single-family homes front the roadway with direct driveway access to the street. 5' wide sidewalks are present in both directions. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 60' wide, two-lane collector street, and raised divided island. Intermittent speed bumps are present. Four unsignalized intersections, three are all-way stop-controlled, and one is a T-intersection. 7' wide bike lanes are present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM P
152

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Maple Street City Index Number: 61
Survey Limits: between West Capitol Avenue and Michigan Boulevard.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/31/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 12:20 PM-2:20 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 87
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 26 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 22 MPH Pace Speed: 17 MPH To 26 MPH
In Pace: 86.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,044
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,056
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 35' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 0 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area and a shopping center. Fronting single-family homes and shopping centers have driveways with direct street access. Sidewalks are not present in both directions. On-street parking may be allowed.

Comments: The nearest increment of the 85th percentile speed is 25 mph. Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 35' wide, two-lane local street, and centerline only divider. Two intersections along segment are all-way stop-controlled. No bike lanes are present.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM P
153

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Merkley Avenue City Index Number: 64
Survey Limits: between Sycamore Street and Westacre Road.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/15/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 12:10 PM-1:30 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 116
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 26 MPH Pace Speed: 20 MPH To 29 MPH
In Pace: 77.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 2,040
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None
Roadway Width: 35' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 6/08/2021
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area and auto service use. Single-family homes and auto service use front the roadway, with direct drivway access to street. 5' wide sidewalks are present in one direction. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 35' wide, two-lane residential collector street. One signalized intersection at the beginning of the corridor and twounsignalized intersections. Bike lanes are not present in both direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
154

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Michigan Boulevard City Index Number: 66 Survey Limits: between Pecan Street and Portsmouth Avenue Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/3/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 12:50 PM-2:50 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 106
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 31 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 27 MPH Pace Speed: 21 MPH To 30 MPH
In Pace: 74.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 561
Length of Segment (In Feet): 4,752
C. Collision History
Number of Collisions (PD) [Jan.18 - Dec.20]: 12
Number of Collisions (SWITRS) [Jan.2018-Dec.2020]: 10
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM): 10.85
Statewide Avg. Accident
Rate for Comparable Street
(Acc/MVM):

1.46 D. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 36' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area. A large number of single-family homes front the roadway. Fronting residential properties have driveways with direct street access. 5' wide sidewalks are present in both directions. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 36' wide, two-lane collector street and centerline divider. Ten unsignalized intersections through the segment, five are all-way stop-controlled, and five are T-intersections. Bike lanes are not present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM P
155

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Michigan Boulevard City Index Number: 67 Survey Limits: between Portsmouth Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/9/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 9:00 AM-10:20 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 112
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 31 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 27 MPH Pace Speed: 22 MPH To 31 MPH
In Pace: 84.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 2,535
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,056
C. Collision History
Number of Collisions (PD) [Jan.18 - Dec.20]: 12
Number of Collisions (SWITRS) [Jan.2018-Dec.2020]: 10
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM): 10.81
Statewide Avg. Accident
Rate for Comparable Street
(Acc/MVM):

1.46 D. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 50' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area. Single-family homes front the roadway with driveways providing direct street access. 5' wide sidewalks are present in both directions. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 50' wide, two-lane collector street, and double yellow centerline divider. Four unsignalized intersections, two are all-way stopcontrolled, and two are T-intersections. Bike lanes are present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
Capital Improvement Manager
156

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: North Harbor Boulevard City Index Number: 68 Survey Limits: between Riverbank Road and Reed Avenue.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/3/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 2:30 PM-3:30 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 110
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 44 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 37 MPH Pace Speed: 34 MPH To 43 MPH
In Pace: 57.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 45 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 4,023
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Low Access control Arterial Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 35' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 45 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 45 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area in a somewhat rural setting. Some residential properties and commercial businesses front the roadway, and have driveways with street access. Roadway has a railroad crossing. Sidewalks are not present in both directions.

On-street parking may not be allowed/feasible.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 45 mph. Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 45 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 35' wide, low access control arterial and striped double-yellow centerline divider. Two unsignalized intersections through the segment are T-intersections. Bike lanes are not present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
157

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Northport Drive City Index Number: 70 Survey Limits: between Commerce Drive and West Capitol Avenue.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/3/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 1:30 PM-2:45 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 112
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 34 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 27 MPH Pace Speed: 23 MPH To 32 MPH
In Pace: 75.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,004
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None
Roadway Width: 50' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? YES
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility.

Adjacent businesses include truck hauling and logistics. Property setbacks are approximately 25 feet from the edge of the roadway. A 5' wide sidewalk is present in both directions. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: The nearest increment of 85th percentile speeds is 35 mph. Per Option 2 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014, round-down of reported 85th percentile speed to nearest 5-mph increment is supportable, if no further reduction is taken. Recommendation is to revise the posted speed limit to 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: A 50' wide local road without a centerline divider. Two T-intersections through the segment. No bike lanes are present.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM P
158

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Oakland Bay Drive City Index Number: 71 Survey Limits: between Southport Parkway and Golden Gate Drive (East).

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/23/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 11:55 AM-1:55 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 115
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 38 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 35 MPH Pace Speed: 29 MPH To 38 MPH
In Pace: 82.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,200
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,056
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 36' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area that includes a school and parks. Residential properties do not have have direct driveway access to the street. 5' wide separated sidewalks are present in both directions. On-street parking may not be allowed.

Comments: The nearest increment of 85th percentile speeds is 40 mph. Per Option 2 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014, round-down of reported 85th percentile speed to nearest 5-mph increment is supportable, if no further reduction is taken. Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: A 36' wide, two-lane local street and striped double-yellow centerline divider. Eleven unsignalized intersections through the segment, one is all-way stop-controlled, and ten are T-intersections. A 7' wide bike lane is present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
159

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Oates Street City Index Number: 72
Survey Limits: between Carlin Drive and Ramos Drive
Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/8/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 11:05 AM-1:05 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 100
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 36 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 30 MPH Pace Speed: 28 MPH To 37 MPH
In Pace: 68.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,377
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: TWLTL
Roadway Width: 56' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? YES
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility.

Adjacent businesses include truck hauling and logistics. Property setbacks are approximately 25 feet from the edge of the roadway. A 5' wide sidewalk is present in one direction. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 35 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, parking and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to revise the posted speed limit to 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 56' wide collector road and a two-way-left-turn striped median divider. Two unsignalized T-intersections exist through the segment. Bike lanes are not present in either directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM P
160

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Pine Street City Index Number: 75
Survey Limits: between West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen Avenue.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/15/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 10:30 AM-12:30 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 85
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 28 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 24 MPH Pace Speed: 19 MPH To 28 MPH
In Pace: 76.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 2,236
Length of Segment (In Feet): 528
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 40' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a higher density residential zone. The apartments along the corridor have driveways that accommodate parking for the residents, and all have direct street access. 5' wide sidewalks are present in both directions. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: The nearest increment of 85th percentile speeds is 30 mph. Per Option 2 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014, round-down of reported 85th percentile speed to nearest 5-mph increment is supportable, if no further reduction is taken. Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 40' wide, two-lane local street and striped double yellow centerline divider. Three unsignalized T intersections are present in the corridor. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
Capital Improvement Manager
161

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Poplar Street City Index Number: 76
Survey Limits: between Evergreen Avenue and Michigan Boulevard.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/16/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 12:25 PM-2:45 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 112
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 29 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 26 MPH Pace Speed: 22 MPH To 31 MPH
In Pace: 90.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 2,057
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,640
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None
Roadway Width: 40' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential and commercial area. Single-family homes, gas stations and shopping centers front the roadway. Residential properties and commercial businesses have driveways with direct street access. 5' wide sidewalks are present in both directions. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: The nearest increment of 85th percentile speed is 30 mph. Per Option 2 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014, round-down of reported 85th percentile speed to nearest 5-mph increment is supportable, if no further reduction is taken. Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 40' wide, two-lane collector street and no center divider. Eight unsignalizeed intersections through the segment; five are all-way stop-controlled and three are T-intersections. No bike lanes are present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM P
Capital Improvement Manager
162

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Port Street City Index Number: 77
Survey Limits: between Shore Street and Terminal Street.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/9/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 9:00 AM-11:00 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 97
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 33 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 27 MPH Pace Speed: 22 MPH To 31 MPH
In Pace: 74.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,548
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 50' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? YES
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility.

Property setbacks are approximately 25 feet from the edge of the roadway. No sidewalk is present. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 35 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, parking and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to revise the posted speed limit to 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 50' wide, two-lane local street. Two unsignalized intersections through the segment are T-intersections. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
163

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Promenade Way City Index Number: 78
Survey Limits: between Ramos Drive and Golden Gate Drive Direction of Travel:

Survey Date: 3/10/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 11:15 AM-12:25 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 109
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 31 MPH Pace Speed: 27 MPH To 36 MPH
In Pace: 77.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 30 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 4,715
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,112
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: Raised Center Median Roadway Width: 80' # of lanes: 4
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 30 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through an industrial-zoned and residential area; the street is lined with large warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility (on the north side of Southport Pkwy). Property setbacks are approximately 42 feet from the edge of the roadway. 5' wide sidewalk is present in both directions. On-street parking is not allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 35 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (bike/pedestrian considerations). Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 80' wide, collector road, and raised divided island divider. Three unsignalized intersections through the segment, one is all-way stop-controlled, and two are T-intersections. 5' wide bike lanes are present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM P
164

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Ramco Street City Index Number: 79
Survey Limits: between Southport Pkwy and South End
Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/15/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 2:00 PM-3:00 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 111
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 42 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 38 MPH Pace Speed: 35 MPH To 44 MPH
In Pace: 77.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,336
Length of Segment (In Feet): 4,224
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: TWLTL
Roadway Width: 55' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility.

Adjacent businesses include logistics. Property setbacks are approximately 25 feet from the edge of the roadway. 7' wide sidewalk is present in both directions. On-street parking is not allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 40 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 55' wide, collector road, and two-way-left-turn striped median divider. Five unsignalized intersections through the segment, one is all-way stop-controlled, and four are T-intersections. 5' wide bike lanes are present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PST
165

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Ramos Drive City Index Number: 80
Survey Limits: between Oates Street and Promenade Street Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/8/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 9:00 AM-11:00 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 81
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 34 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 29 MPH Pace Speed: 25 MPH To 34 MPH
In Pace: 63.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 591
Length of Segment (In Feet): 528
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: TWLTL
Roadway Width: 50' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? YES
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility.

Adjacent businesses include truck hauling and logistics. Property setbacks are approximately 25 feet from the edge of the roadway. A 6' wide sidewalk is presented in one direction. On-street parking may be allowed.

Comments: The nearest increment of 85th percentile speed is 35 mph. Per Option 2 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014, round-down of reported 85th percentile speed to nearest 5-mph increment is supportable, if no further reduction is taken. Recommendation is to revise the posted speed limit to 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 50' wide, two-lane local street, and two-way-left-turn striped median divider. One unsignalized intersection is T-intersection. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
166

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Riverbank Road City Index Number: 83
Survey Limits: between North Harbor Road and Bryte Avenue.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/3/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 9:15 AM-11:15 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 70
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 31 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 28 MPH Pace Speed: 23 MPH To 32 MPH
In Pace: 87.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 979
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,112
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 30' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential and Industrial area, and along the south bank of the Sacramento River. Single-family homes front the south side of the roadway, and California Department of Water Resources facilities are located on the north side. Some residential properties have direct driveway access to the street. 5' wide sidewalks is present along the curb on the south side of the street. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 30' wide, two-lane collector street and striped double-yellow centerline. Seven unsignalized intersections through the segment are T-intersections. Bike lanes are not present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
167

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Seaport Boulevard City Index Number: 87 Survey Limits: between West End and Parkway Boulevard.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/15/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 3:15 PM-4:15 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 128
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 42 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 37 MPH Pace Speed: 33 MPH To 42 MPH
In Pace: 66.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 2,458
Length of Segment (In Feet): 5,280
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 50' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and driveways with street access. Property setbacks are approximately 25 feet from the edge of the roadway. No sidewalk is present in either direction. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 40 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, parking and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 50' wide, two-lane local street and centerline divider. Three unsignalized intersections exist through the segment; one is all-way stop-controlled, and two are T-intersections. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
168

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Shore Street City Index Number: 88
Survey Limits: between Front Street and Del Monte Street.

Direction of Travel: Nothbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/9/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 1:15 PM-3:15 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 108
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 34 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 29 MPH Pace Speed: 24 MPH To 33 MPH
In Pace: 69.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 30 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 3,586
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 50' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 30 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is in an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility.

Property setbacks are approximately 25 feet from the edge of the roadway. No sidewalk is present. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: The nearest increment of 85th percentile speed is 35 mph. Per Option 2 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014, round-down of reported 85th percentile speed to nearest 5-mph increment is supportable, if no further reduction is taken. Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 50' wide, two-lane local street with two unsignaled T-intersections. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
169

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Stonegate Drive City Index Number: 102 Survey Limits: between Lake Washington Boulevard and Village Parkway.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/10/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 10:30 AM-11:30 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 141
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 41 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 36 MPH Pace Speed: 31 MPH To 40 MPH
In Pace: 74.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 4,568
Length of Segment (In Feet): 3,168
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 35' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a primarily single family residential neighborhood with schools and parks. Residential properties however have no direct driveway access to the street. 5' wide separated sidewalks are present in both directions. On-street parking is not allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 40 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 35' wide traveled way, two-lane collector street and striped double-yellow centerline divider. Five unsignalized intersections through the segment, two are all-way stop-controlled, and three are T-intersections. A 7' wide bike lane is present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM P
170

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Sutter Street City Index Number: 104
Survey Limits: between West Capitol Avenue and North End.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/8/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 10:10 AM-12:10 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 81
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 18 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 16 MPH Pace Speed: 11 MPH To 20 MPH
In Pace: 99.0%
Existing Speed Limit: None
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 645
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,112
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None
Roadway Width: 30' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? YES
Existing Speed Limit: None Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment is a partly private street running through an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility. Property setbacks are approximately 25 feet from the edge of the roadway. No sidewalk is present in both directions. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: There are no existing speed limit signs posted for this street. Prima facie speed limit of 25 mph may be recommended.

Roadway Geometrics: 30' wide, two-lane local street without bike lanes or center dividers/medians. One unsignalized T-intersection. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
171

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Sycamore Street City Index Number: 105 Survey Limits: between West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen Avenue.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/9/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 10:30 AM-11:45 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 118
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 25 MPH Pace Speed: 20 MPH To 29 MPH
In Pace: 80.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,725
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,056
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 38' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area, however there is no or limited direct driveway access to the street from residential properties. 5' wide sidewalks are presented in both directions. On-street parking (including perpendicular parking) is allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 30 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (parking and bike/pedestrian considerations). Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 38' wide, two-lane collector street, and centerline divider. Five unsignalized intersections through the segment, one is all-way stop-controlled, and four are T-intersections. Bike lanes are not present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
172

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Terminal Street City Index Number: 106 Survey Limits: between Del Monte Street and Industrial Boulevard.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/8/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 9:00 AM-10:20 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 111
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 28 MPH Pace Speed: 22 MPH To 31 MPH
In Pace: 59.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 30 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 3,355
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Low Access control Arterial Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 63' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 30 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs throuhh an industrial-zoned area; a street lined with large warehouses and driveways for large truck accessibility. Property setbacks are approximately 25 feet from the edge of the roadway. Sidewalks are not present. On-street parking may be allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 35 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 63' wide, low access control arterial and striped double-yellow centerline divider. Two unsignalized intersections through the segment, one is all-way stop-controlled, and one is T-intersection. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
173

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Todhunter Avenue City Index Number: 107 Survey Limits: between Anna Street and Sacramento Avenue Direction of Travel: Northbound/SouthBound
Survey Date: 3/2/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 2:25 PM-3:35 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 103
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 29 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 26 MPH Pace Speed: 21 MPH To 30 MPH
In Pace: 88.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 3,497
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,112
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Collector Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 40' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential area. Single-family homes front the roadway, with several residential properies with direct driveway access to the street. 5' wide sidewalks are presented in both directions. On-street parking is allowed.

Comments: The nearest increment of 85th percentile speed is 30 mph. Per Option 2 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014, round-down of reported 85th percentile speed to nearest 5-mph increment is supportable, if no further reduction is taken. Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 40' wide, two-lane collector street, no centerline divider. Seven unsignalized intersections through the segment, four are all-way stop-controlled, and three are T-intersections. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
Capital Improvement Manager
174

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Westacre Road City Index Number: 114
Survey Limits: between Michigan Boulevard and West Capitol Avenue.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/2/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 9:00 AM-10:30 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 103
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 28 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 25 MPH Pace Speed: 20 MPH To 29 MPH
In Pace: 88.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,717
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,056
C. Collision History
Number of Collisions (PD) [Jan.18 - Dec.20]: 31
Number of Collisions (SWITRS) [Jan.2018-Dec.2020]: 23
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM): 61.17
Statewide Avg. Accident
Rate for Comparable Street
(Acc/MVM):

1.46 D. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Local Center Divider: None, double-yellow centerline Roadway Width: 40' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential and commercial area. A large number of single-family homes, grocery and fast food front the roadway, and have direct driveway access to the street. 5' wide sidewalks are present in both directions. On-street parking may be allowed.

Comments: The nearest increment of 85th percentile speed is 30 mph. Per Option 2 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014, round-down of reported 85th percentile speed to nearest 5-mph increment is supportable, if no further reduction is taken. Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 40' wide, two-lane local street, striped double-yellow centerline. Five unsignalized intersections through the segment, which are all-way stop-controlled. Bike lanes are not present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
Capital Improvement Manager
175

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: 3rd Street City Index Number: 115
Survey Limits: between B Street and West Capitol Avenue.

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 3/23/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 10:40 AM-12:05 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 102
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 28 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 23 MPH Pace Speed: 19 MPH To 28 MPH
In Pace: 80.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 2,296
Length of Segment (In Feet): 4,752
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Low Access control Arterial Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 55' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential and commercial area in the business district. Single-family homes, government buildings, and restaurants front the roadway, and several uses have driveways with street access. 5' wide sidewalks are present in both directions. Onstreet parking is allowed.

Comments: The nearest increment of 85th percentile speed is 30 mph. Per Option 2 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014, round-down of reported 85th percentile speed to nearest 5-mph increment is supportable, if no further reduction is taken. Recommendation is to retain the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 55' wide, two-lane collector street and centerline divider. Three unsignalized intersections through the segment, one is all-way stop-controlled, and two are T-intersections. The intersections with Tower Bridge Gateway, G St, F St, E St, and C St are all signalized intersections. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC Capital Improvement Manager 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM PS
176

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: 15th Street City Index Number: 118
Survey Limits: between Jefferson Boulevard and South River Road.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 3/18/2022 Survey Day: Friday
Survey Time: 12:00 PM-1:00 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 162
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 36 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 32 MPH Pace Speed: 27 MPH To 36 MPH
In Pace: 81.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 5,308
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,056
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Low Access control Arterial Center Divider: None, centerline only Roadway Width: 47' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? YES
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 30 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 11/18/2022
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The short segment runs through an industrial/commercial parcels fronting on either side of the road, mid-block driveway access is allowed. Property setbacks are approximately 25 feet from the edge of the roadway. 5' wide sidewalk is present in one direction, on-street parking may not be allowed.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 35 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (bike/pedestrian considerations). Recommendation is to revise the posted speed limit to 30 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 47' wide, low access control arterial road, and striped double-yellow centerline divider. A traffic signalized intersection and one unsignalized intersection on the segment. Bike lanes are present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 2/27/2023 | 9:29:44 AM
Capital Improvement Manager
177
Appendix Exhibit D

1. Spot Speed Surveys – National Data & Surveying Services (NDS) DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 178
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20 1
21 2
22 2
23 4
24 6
25 8
26 11
27 13
28 11
29 9
30 7
31 8
32 6
33 4
34 3
35 3
36 1
37 38 1
39 2
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 102 20 - 39 28 mph 32 mph 23 - 32 83 81% 4% / 5 14% / 14

SPEED PARAMETERS
Anna St Bet. Bryte Ave & Kegle Dr
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:15-11:55
3/2/2022
Project #: 22-070044-001
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 179
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: None Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 2
16 17 6
18 5
19 5
20 8
21 10
22 5
23 7
24 3
25 6
26 2
27 2
28 1
29 1
30 31 2
32 1
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 66 15 - 32 21 mph 25 mph 17 - 26 57 86% 3% / 2 11% / 7

SPEED PARAMETERS
Boatman Ave Bet. Industrial Blvd & Terminal St
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:00-13:00
3/9/2022
Project #: 22-070044-002
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 180
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 1
18 1
19 20 3
21 1
22 2
23 5
24 7
25 11
26 9
27 13
28 11
29 8
30 9
31 5
32 4
33 7
34 4
35 1
36 1
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 103 17 - 36 27 mph 32 mph 24 - 33 84 82% 12% / 13 6% / 6

SPEED PARAMETERS
Bryte Ave Bet. Riverbank Rd & Sacramento Ave
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
12:45-13:55
3/3/2022
Project #: 22-070044-003
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 181
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18 1
19 20 1
21 1
22 1
23 3
24 6
25 15
26 6
27 16
28 10
29 16
30 20
31 13
32 21
33 10
34 8
35 12
36 11
37 7
38 11
39 4
40 5
41 1
42 3
43 44 2
45 2
46 47
48 1
49 50 1
51 52 1
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 209 18 - 52 31 mph 37 mph 27 - 36 137 66% 16% / 34 19% / 38

SPEED PARAMETERS
C St Bet. 5th St & East City Limit
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:30-13:30
3/8/2022
Project #: 22-070044-004
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 182
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: None Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 2
22 2
23 2
24 4
25 5
26 5
27 7
28 8
29 3
30 7
31 8
32 12
33 4
34 10
35 6
36 3
37 1
38 39 3
40 2
41 2
42 4
43 2
44 2
45 46
47 1
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 105 21 - 47 31 mph 39 mph 26 - 35 70 67% 14% / 15 20% / 20

SPEED PARAMETERS
Carlin Dr Bet. Oates Dr & Ramco St
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:00-13:15
3/9/2022
Project #: 22-070044-005
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 183
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 1
22 4
23 5
24 6
25 10
26 14
27 13
28 10
29 9
30 7
31 5
32 4
33 4
34 2
35 2
36 2
37 1
38 39
40 41 1
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 21 - 41 27 mph 32 mph 22 - 31 83 83% 1% / 1 16% / 16

SPEED PARAMETERS
Carrie St Bet. Bryte Ave & Kegle Dr
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:15-14:15
3/2/2022
Project #: 22-070044-006
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 184
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 2
24 4
25 7
26 4
27 3
28 3
29 9
30 9
31 8
32 8
33 9
34 7
35 11
36 7
37 5
38 4
39 3
40 1
41 4
42 43 1
44 1
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 110 23 - 44 32 mph 37 mph 29 - 38 77 70% 20% / 23 10% / 10

SPEED PARAMETERS
Cebrian St Bet. Del Monte St & Stone Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:35-12:35
3/8/2022
Project #: 22-070044-007
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 185
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 2
20 1
21 22
23 24 3
25 5
26 6
27 3
28 3
29 5
30 7
31 9
32 7
33 8
34 7
35 10
36 8
37 3
38 3
39 5
40 3
41 4
42 43 1
44 45 1
46 2
47 48
49 1
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 107 19 - 49 33 mph 39 mph 27 - 36 67 63% 15% / 17 22% / 23

SPEED PARAMETERS
Channel Dr Bet. Seaport Blvd & Channel Dr (West End)
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
14:30-16:00
3/17/2022
Project #: 22-070044-008
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 186
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: None Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 1
18 4
19 1
20 5
21 1
22 4
23 1
24 1
25 6
26 3
27 28 3
29 30 3
31 32 3
33 1
34 35 1
36 37 1
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 39 17 - 37 25 mph 32 mph 17 - 26 27 69% 0% / 0 31% / 12

SPEED PARAMETERS
Commerce Dr Bet. Commerce Dr West End & Commerce Dr East End City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:00-13:00
3/3/2022
Project #: 22-070044-009
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 187
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 1
20 21
22 23
24 2
25 3
26 27
28 2
29 4
30 31
32 1
33 34
35 5
36 2
37 38
39 2
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 22 19 - 39 29 mph 36 mph 27 - 36 14 64% 27% / 6 10% / 2

SPEED PARAMETERS
Davis Rd Bet. Seymour Ave & Jefferson Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:30-11:30
3/23/2022
Project #: 22-070044-010
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 188
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18 1
19 20 2
21 1
22 1
23 5
24 4
25 6
26 16
27 11
28 12
29 11
30 10
31 7
32 12
33 4
34 2
35 1
36 2
37 38
39 1
40 1
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 110 18 - 40 28 mph 32 mph 23 - 32 94 85% 4% / 5 10% / 11

SPEED PARAMETERS
Douglas St Bet. Lighthouse Dr & Sacramento Ave
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
13:45-15:10
3/8/2022
Project #: 22-070044-011
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 189
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: None Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 3
16 17 2
18 10
19 5
20 6
21 22 9
23 2
24 6
25 12
26 9
27 6
28 9
29 3
30 5
31 6
32 7
33 2
34 2
35 36 1
37 2
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 107 15 - 37 25 mph 31 mph 22 - 31 67 63% 24% / 26 14% / 14

SPEED PARAMETERS
Duluth St Bet. Galveston St & Harbor Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:10-14:40
3/3/2022
Project #: 22-070044-012
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 190
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: None Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 1
24 3
25 5
26 1
27 5
28 3
29 7
30 11
31 8
32 9
33 11
34 7
35 13
36 3
37 6
38 5
39 2
40 4
41 1
42 1
43 2
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 108 23 - 43 33 mph 37 mph 29 - 38 80 74% 16% / 18 10% / 10

SPEED PARAMETERS
Evergreen Ave Bet. Pine Ave & Harbor Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:35-14:00
3/10/2022
Project #: 22-070044-013
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 191
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 2
24 5
25 9
26 6
27 9
28 11
29 10
30 15
31 16
32 8
33 7
34 2
35 9
36 3
37 6
38 2
39 2
40 2
41 1
42 1
43 1
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 127 23 - 43 30 mph 35 mph 24 - 33 96 76% 1% / 2 23% / 29

SPEED PARAMETERS
Evergreen Ave Bet. Harbor Blvd & Coke St
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:05-12:30
3/10/2022
Project #: 22-070044-014
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 192
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: None Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20 2
21 1
22 4
23 4
24 5
25 7
26 2
27 2
28 1
29 1
30 2
31 2
32 33 1
34 35 2
36 37
38 39 1
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 37 20 - 39 25 mph 31 mph 22 - 31 30 81% 8% / 3 11% / 4

SPEED PARAMETERS
Front St Bet. Shore St & Terminal St
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-11:00
3/10/2022
Project #: 22-070044-015
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 193
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 1
16 17 1
18 4
19 20 3
21 1
22 4
23 12
24 4
25 12
26 8
27 10
28 4
29 5
30 10
31 3
32 5
33 2
34 2
35 4
36 1
37 1
38 39 2
40 41 1
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 15 - 41 26 mph 32 mph 23 - 32 73 73% 14% / 14 13% / 13

SPEED PARAMETERS
Galveston St Bet. Duluth St & Canal St
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-11:00
3/3/2022
Project #: 22-070044-016
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 194
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: None Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 2
25 3
26 2
27 2
28 3
29 4
30 3
31 32 10
33 3
34 3
35 2
36 2
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 39 24 - 36 32 mph 34 mph 25 - 34 33 85% 5% / 2 11% / 4

SPEED PARAMETERS
Golden Gate Dr Bet. Oakland Bay Dr & Promenade St
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:10-11:10
3/10/2022
Project #: 22-070044-017
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 195
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 1
23 1
24 25 3
26 3
27 6
28 10
29 6
30 14
31 8
32 4
33 9
34 8
35 6
36 9
37 8
38 1
39 40
41 2
42 2
43 1
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 102 22 - 43 31 mph 36 mph 28 - 37 82 80% 13% / 14 6% / 6

SPEED PARAMETERS
Golden Gate Dr Bet. Promenade St & Marshall Rd
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:30-11:45
3/15/2022
Project #: 22-070044-018
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 196
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 1
34 1
35 3
36 4
37 6
38 4
39 6
40 8
41 10
42 7
43 9
44 9
45 6
46 8
47 6
48 7
49 6
50 6
51 3
52 3
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 113 33 - 52 43 mph 49 mph 39 - 48 76 67% 16% / 19 16% / 18

SPEED PARAMETERS
Gregory Ave Bet. Bevan Rd & S River Rd
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
12:40-13:45
3/10/2022
Project #: 22-070044-019
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 197
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20 1
21 2
22 1
23 1
24 3
25 1
26 27 3
28 29 3
30 31
32 2
33 2
34 35 5
36 37
38 1
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 25 20 - 38 29 mph 35 mph 20 - 29 15 60% 0% / 0 40% / 10

SPEED PARAMETERS
Harmon Rd Bet. Jefferson Blvd & Antioch Ave
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:35-13:35
3/24/2022
Project #: 22-070044-020
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 198
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: None Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20 2
21 22 3
23 2
24 2
25 8
26 3
27 1
28 1
29 1
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 23 20 - 29 25 mph 26 mph 20 - 29 23 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
Hart Ave Bet. Allen Ave & Higgins Rd
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
14:00-16:00
3/24/2022
Project #: 22-070044-021
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 199
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 1
18 1
19 20 4
21 1
22 8
23 5
24 9
25 15
26 11
27 11
28 9
29 5
30 3
31 6
32 3
33 1
34 3
35 3
36 37 1
38 39
40 1
41 42
43 1
44 1
45 1
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 104 17 - 45 26 mph 31 mph 22 - 31 82 79% 6% / 7 15% / 15

SPEED PARAMETERS
Houston St Bet. W Capitol Ave & Duluth St
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:10-12:55
3/3/2022
Project #: 22-070044-022
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 200
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20 2
21 1
22 4
23 4
24 3
25 7
26 9
27 6
28 10
29 10
30 14
31 7
32 8
33 4
34 1
35 4
36 3
37 2
38 1
39 1
40 41
42 1
43 1
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 103 20 - 43 29 mph 33 mph 23 - 32 78 76% 6% / 7 18% / 18

SPEED PARAMETERS
Higgins Rd Bet. Linden Rd & Hart Ave
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:45-11:45
3/24/2022
Project #: 22-070044-023
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 201
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 1
20 3
21 4
22 3
23 7
24 11
25 18
26 7
27 5
28 9
29 6
30 5
31 6
32 6
33 4
34 1
35 4
36 1
37 1
38 2
39 40 1
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 105 19 - 40 26 mph 32 mph 23 - 32 80 76% 10% / 11 14% / 14

SPEED PARAMETERS
Higgins Rd Bet. Hart Ave & Jefferson Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:00-14:00
3/23/2022
Project #: 22-070044-024
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 202
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 1
29 1
30 3
31 4
32 5
33 8
34 8
35 10
36 9
37 10
38 12
39 14
40 11
41 11
42 9
43 7
44 6
45 4
46 1
47 1
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 135 28 - 47 38 mph 42 mph 33 - 42 102 76% 10% / 14 15% / 19

SPEED PARAMETERS
Jefferson Blvd Bet. W Capitol Ave & 15th St
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:45-11:45
3/17/2022
Project #: 22-070044-025
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 203
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 55 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 1
42 43
44 1
45 4
46 4
47 4
48 5
49 4
50 5
51 6
52 10
53 10
54 8
55 8
56 5
57 5
58 6
59 3
60 3
61 2
62 3
63 2
64 2
65 1
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 102 41 - 65 53 mph 59 mph 49 - 58 67 66% 18% / 19 16% / 16

SPEED PARAMETERS
Jefferson Blvd Bet. Davis Rd & Southport Pkwy
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:25-12:30
3/15/2022
Project #: 22-070044-026
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 204
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18 3
19 20 8
21 3
22 4
23 7
24 8
25 17
26 16
27 11
28 14
29 3
30 10
31 3
32 4
33 1
34 4
35 36 1
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 117 18 - 36 26 mph 30 mph 21 - 30 93 79% 9% / 11 12% / 13

SPEED PARAMETERS
Lighthouse Dr Bet. Fountain Dr & Kegle Dr
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:25-12:10
3/9/2022
Project #: 22-070044-030
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 205
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 1
16 17 4
18 5
19 7
20 10
21 12
22 9
23 8
24 6
25 6
26 8
27 2
28 4
29 2
30 2
31 32
33 34
35 1
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 87 15 - 35 22 mph 26 mph 17 - 26 75 86% 1% / 1 13% / 11

SPEED PARAMETERS
Maple St Bet. W Capitol Ave & Michigan Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
12:20-14:20
3/31/2022
Project #: 22-070044-032
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 206
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 1
32 1
33 1
34 1
35 2
36 5
37 7
38 6
39 12
40 9
41 10
42 9
43 8
44 8
45 5
46 3
47 4
48 4
49 3
50 2
51 2
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 103 31 - 51 41 mph 46 mph 36 - 45 79 77% 5% / 6 18% / 18

SPEED PARAMETERS
Marshall Rd Bet. Marshall West End & Golden Gate Dr
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:45-13:45
3/15/2022
Project #: 22-070044-033
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 207
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18 3
19 2
20 4
21 5
22 7
23 8
24 7
25 10
26 6
27 8
28 11
29 9
30 7
31 4
32 7
33 2
34 3
35 1
36 37 1
38 39 1
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 106 18 - 39 27 mph 31 mph 21 - 30 78 74% 8% / 9 18% / 19

SPEED PARAMETERS
Michigan Blvd Bet. Pecan St & Jefferson Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:50-14:50
3/3/2022
Project #: 22-070044-036
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 208
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20 7
21 3
22 6
23 5
24 8
25 13
26 7
27 8
28 20
29 9
30 7
31 11
32 1
33 2
34 2
35 2
36 37 1
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 112 20 - 37 27 mph 31 mph 22 - 31 94 84% 8% / 10 8% / 8

SPEED PARAMETERS
Michigan Blvd Bet. Portsmouth Ave & Jefferson Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:20
3/9/2022
Project #: 22-070044-037
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 209
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 1
23 1
24 1
25 2
26 1
27 1
28 3
29 3
30 2
31 5
32 4
33 4
34 8
35 7
36 5
37 7
38 5
39 7
40 7
41 5
42 7
43 5
44 3
45 4
46 3
47 2
48 2
49 2
50 2
51 1
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 110 22 - 51 37 mph 44 mph 34 - 43 63 57% 25% / 28 18% / 19

SPEED PARAMETERS
N Harbor Blvd Bet. Riverbank Rd & Reed Ave
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
14:30-15:30
3/3/2022
Project #: 22-070044-038
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 210
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18 1
19 20 3
21 1
22 4
23 9
24 8
25 18
26 10
27 7
28 8
29 2
30 9
31 8
32 5
33 2
34 6
35 4
36 2
37 2
38 1
39 1
40 41
42 1
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 112 18 - 42 27 mph 34 mph 23 - 32 84 75% 8% / 9 17% / 19

SPEED PARAMETERS
Northport Dr Bet. Commerce Dr & W Capitol Ave
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
13:30-14:45
3/3/2022
Project #: 22-070044-040
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 211
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 2
26 1
27 1
28 4
29 6
30 10
31 5
32 8
33 11
34 9
35 16
36 6
37 12
38 11
39 1
40 5
41 2
42 1
43 2
44 1
45 46
47 1
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 115 25 - 47 35 mph 38 mph 29 - 38 94 82% 6% / 8 12% / 13

SPEED PARAMETERS
Oakland Bay Dr Bet. Southport Pkwy & Golden Gate Dr
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:55-13:55
3/23/2022
Project #: 22-070044-041
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 212
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: None Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 4
20 21
22 6
23 8
24 25 3
26 5
27 2
28 6
29 13
30 8
31 5
32 8
33 10
34 2
35 3
36 2
37 11
38 39 1
40 2
41 1
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 19 - 41 30 mph 36 mph 28 - 37 68 68% 28% / 28 4% / 4

SPEED PARAMETERS
Oates St Bet. Carlin Dr & Ramos Dr
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:05-13:05
3/8/2022
Project #: 22-070044-042
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 213
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14 1
15 1
16 3
17 3
18 3
19 5
20 7
21 5
22 7
23 5
24 7
25 8
26 9
27 6
28 6
29 2
30 2
31 2
32 33 1
34 1
35 1
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 85 14 - 35 24 mph 28 mph 19 - 28 65 76% 12% / 11 11% / 9

SPEED PARAMETERS
Pine Ave Bet. W Capitol Ave & Evergreen Ave
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:30-12:30
3/15/2022
Project #: 22-070044-044
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 214
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18 1
19 20 1
21 2
22 5
23 10
24 12
25 20
26 14
27 10
28 14
29 7
30 4
31 5
32 4
33 2
34 1
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 112 18 - 34 26 mph 29 mph 22 - 31 101 90% 3% / 4 7% / 7

SPEED PARAMETERS
Poplar Ave Bet. Evergreen Ave & Michigan Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
12:25-14:25
3/16/2022
Project #: 22-070044-045
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 215
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: None Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20 3
21 3
22 6
23 5
24 7
25 9
26 7
27 10
28 11
29 7
30 6
31 4
32 3
33 3
34 4
35 4
36 2
37 38
39 1
40 1
41 1
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 97 20 - 41 27 mph 33 mph 22 - 31 72 74% 6% / 6 20% / 19

SPEED PARAMETERS
Port St Bet. Shore St & Terminal St
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-11:00
3/9/2022
Project #: 22-070044-046
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 216
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 5
23 24 3
25 8
26 2
27 11
28 6
29 8
30 11
31 8
32 7
33 15
34 5
35 10
36 3
37 7
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 109 22 - 37 31 mph 35 mph 27 - 36 84 77% 16% / 18 7% / 7

SPEED PARAMETERS
Promenade St Bet. Ramos Dr & Golden Gate Dr
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:15-12:25
3/10/2022
Project #: 22-070044-047
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 217
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 2
28 2
29 1
30 2
31 2
32 4
33 5
34 5
35 10
36 9
37 8
38 12
39 6
40 11
41 9
42 9
43 5
44 6
45 1
46 2
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 111 27 - 46 38 mph 42 mph 35 - 44 85 77% 20% / 23 3% / 3

SPEED PARAMETERS
Ramco St Bet. Southport Pkwy & Ramco St South End
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
14:00-15:00
3/15/2022
Project #: 22-070044-048
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 218
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: None Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18 2
19 4
20 3
21 3
22 23 5
24 1
25 2
26 8
27 8
28 4
29 1
30 5
31 7
32 4
33 8
34 4
35 36 1
37 2
38 3
39 1
40 4
41 42
43 1
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 81 18 - 43 29 mph 34 mph 25 - 34 51 63% 22% / 18 15% / 12

SPEED PARAMETERS
Ramos Dr Bet. Oates St & Promenade St
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-11:00
3/8/2022
Project #: 22-070044-049
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 219
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 2
22 2
23 4
24 6
25 7
26 7
27 6
28 8
29 8
30 5
31 5
32 5
33 2
34 1
35 36 1
37 38
39 1
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 70 21 - 39 28 mph 31 mph 23 - 32 61 87% 5% / 4 8% / 5

SPEED PARAMETERS
Riverbank Rd Bet. N Harbor Rd & Bryte Ave
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:15-11:15
3/3/2022
Project #: 22-070044-051
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 220
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 1
27 28 4
29 5
30 3
31 7
32 6
33 4
34 8
35 9
36 10
37 7
38 12
39 10
40 7
41 10
42 7
43 3
44 6
45 5
46 2
47 1
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 128 25 - 47 37 mph 42 mph 33 - 42 84 66% 21% / 27 14% / 17

SPEED PARAMETERS
Seaport Blvd Bet. Seaport Blvd West End & Parkway Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
15:15-16:15
3/15/2022
Project #: 22-070044-052
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 221
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 4
23 6
24 8
25 9
26 7
27 8
28 8
29 7
30 9
31 6
32 6
33 7
34 8
35 7
36 4
37 2
38 1
39 40 1
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 108 22 - 40 29 mph 34 mph 24 - 33 75 69% 9% / 10 22% / 23

SPEED PARAMETERS
Shore St Bet. Front St & Del Monte St
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
13:15-15:15
3/9/2022
Project #: 22-070044-053
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 222
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 27
28 2
29 6
30 5
31 11
32 11
33 11
34 9
35 14
36 12
37 10
38 11
39 9
40 7
41 8
42 5
43 3
44 2
45 2
46 1
47 48
49 1
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 141 25 - 49 36 mph 41 mph 31 - 40 105 74% 9% / 14 16% / 22

SPEED PARAMETERS
Stonegate Dr Bet. Lake Washington Blvd & Village Pkwy
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:30-11:30
3/10/2022
Project #: 22-070044-058
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 223
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: None Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 3
12 7
13 4
14 16
15 10
16 19
17 8
18 8
19 4
20 1
21 22 1
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 81 11 - 22 16 mph 18 mph 11 - 20 80 99% 0% / 0 2% / 1

SPEED PARAMETERS
Sutter St Bet. W Capitol Ave & Sutter St North End
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:10-12:10
3/8/2022
Project #: 22-070044-059
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 224
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 6
20 11
21 3
22 12
23 15
24 4
25 16
26 5
27 7
28 13
29 8
30 10
31 2
32 4
33 1
34 35 1
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 118 19 - 35 25 mph 30 mph 20 - 29 94 80% 5% / 6 16% / 18

SPEED PARAMETERS
Sycamore Ave Bet. W Capitol Ave & Evergreen Ave
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:30-11:45
3/9/2022
Project #: 22-070044-060
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 225
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20 7
21 4
22 6
23 7
24 5
25 14
26 4
27 7
28 6
29 2
30 7
31 8
32 6
33 3
34 3
35 9
36 1
37 3
38 2
39 2
40 1
41 42 2
43 2
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 111 20 - 43 28 mph 35 mph 22 - 31 66 59% 9% / 11 31% / 34

SPEED PARAMETERS
Terminal St Bet. Del Monte St & Industrial Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:20
3/8/2022
Project #: 22-070044-061
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: DFB6F219-3215-4E9B-B199-8AD633E3B1BC 226
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location: