West Sacramento City Council
September 27, 2023

WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL AND WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR

AGENCY & WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
City Council Special Meeting
SEPTEMBER 27, 2023 AGENDA
Martha Guerrero, Mayor
Quirina Orozco, Mayor Pro Tem
Norma Alcala, Council Member
Dawnté Early, Council Member
Verna Sulpizio Hull, Council Member
Aaron Laurel, City Manager
Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney
6:00 PM Closed Session Call to Order
7:00 PM Regular Meeting Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Land Acknowledgment
The meeting will be held at City Hall, City Council Chambers, 1110 West Capitol Avenue, West Sacramento GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART I

1. PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WITHIN THE

JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL
The Council is prohibited from discussing issues not on the agenda brought to them at this time.

According to State Law (the Brown Act), items must first be noticed on the agenda before any discussion or action.

PRESENTATIONS

2. City Manager's Office

PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO HONORING

THE LIFE AND LEGACY OF YOLO COUNTY SUPERVISOR GARY SANDY

3. City Manager's Office

PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH

CONSENT AGENDA

4. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT 2 TO THE CONTRACT FOR SERVICES

WITH DISABILITY ACCESS CONSULTANTS
Anyone wishing to address the Council, or any agenda item, may fill out the Request to Speak card and present it to the City Clerk prior to the completion of staff presentation. Items on the Consent Agenda will be considered in one motion and the Request to Speak card should be turned in prior to the first item on Consent.
1 Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to approve Amendment 2 to the Contract for Services with Disability Access Consultants to provide ADA compliance, coordination, and consultation services.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Approve Amendment 2 to the Contract for Services with Disability Access Consultants for the amount of $79,500. (2) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendments or change orders up to 15% ($19,350) of the contract value.

5. Capital Projects

CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF A CONTRACT TO HITOUCH SERVICES FOR THE FURNITURE AND WORKSTATIONS FOR THE FIRE STATION 45 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (CIP 51278)
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to award a Construction Contract to HiTouch Services for the purchase and assembly of furniture and workstations for the Fire Station 45 Improvements Project (CIP 51278) Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Award a Contract utilizing the Sourcewell Cooperative agreement to Hitouch Services for the furniture and workstations for the Fire Station 45 Improvements Project; (2) Delegate authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with HiTouch Services in an amount not to exceed $130,605.87; and (3) Delegate authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments, miscellaneous construction cost, or contract change orders up to 15% ($19,590) of the total contract amount.

6. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 23-9 AMENDING TITLE 10 (VEHICLES

AND TRAFFIC) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF

SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (CIP 12019)
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to consider the approval of proposed amendments to Title 10 of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Waive the first reading and read by title and number only, Ordinance 23-9, amending Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento; and (2) Inform the public that the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 23-9 is scheduled for November 1, 2023.

7. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-66 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO

THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) FOR THE APPROPRIATION OF CDBG GRANT

FUNDS TO THE CIP BUDGET FOR THE WASHINGTON AND BRODERICK LIGHTING AND SAFETY PROJECT (CIP 15053)
2 Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information for the adoption of Resolution 23-66 approving an amendment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the appropriation of CDBG Grant Funds to the CIP Budget for the Washington and Broderick Lighting and Safety Project (CIP 15053).

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Adopt Resolution 23- 66 approving an amendment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the appropriation of $400,000 of CDBG grant funds to the CIP budget for CIP 15053; (2) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an increase to the purchase order for electrical materials from JAM Services, Inc, in the amount of $40,252.25; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to execute changes up to 10% ($4,025) of the value of the increase to the purchase order.

8. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-68 REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE AND SUBMIT AN FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM TO THE

SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Objective: This report's purpose is to request City Council authorization to execute and submit the 2023/2024 Transportation Development Act Claim to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG).

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 23-68 requesting authorization to execute and submit the FY 2023/24 Transportation Development Act claim to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments.

9. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23- 73 ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED FOR SUBDIVISION 5176, “THE RIVERS PHASE II”
Objective: To accept public improvements constructed as a requirement for approval of Subdivision 5176, “The Rivers, Phase II”.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 23-73, accepting the public improvements required of Subdivision 5176, “The Rivers, Phase II”.

10. Community Development

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH

SCI CONSULTING TO PRODUCE A STORM DRAINAGE & STORMWATER FINANCE PLAN Objective: The objective of this report is to acquire Council approval of a contract for professional services with SCI Consulting Group to produce a Financing Plan to implement recommendations made in the Storm Drainage/ Stormwater Master Plan.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Approve a $95,828 professional services contract with SCI Consulting Group; (2) Delegate authority to the City 3 Manager, or his designee, to execute the contract; (3) Authorize the City Manager to execute nonsubstantive changes or modifications to the Contract for Services, with approval from the City Attorney; and (4) Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute amendments or change orders up to 15% ($14,374) of the contract.

11. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-51 TERMINATING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH GOLD MOUNTAIN DISTRIBUTION AT 3939 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE SUITE C Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the Council with sufficient information to consider termination of the Development Agreement with Gold Mountain Distribution.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Adopt Resolution 23- 51 terminating the development agreement with Gold Mountain Distribution; and (2) Direct staff to pursue any necessary actions to ensure that this business no longer operates at the subject location.

12. Economic Development & Housing
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-10 AND AWARD OF CONTRACT TO TURTON

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE FOR CLUB PHEASANT DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY

CONSULTANT SERVICES
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide information to the City Council for consideration of a contract award with Turton Commercial Real Estate for development advisory consultant services for the Club Pheasant property located at 2525 Jefferson Boulevard, as well as budget actions to support ongoing property management.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Adopt Resolution 23- 10 appropriating funding from Fund 106 in an amount not to exceed $200,000 for Club Pheasant property management, marketing and disposition services; (2) Award a Professional Services Contract with Turton Commercial Real Estate for Club Pheasant development advisory consultant services in an amount not to exceed $100,000; (3) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the Contract with Turton Commercial Real Estate in the amount of $100,000; (4) Authorize the City Manager to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the Contract with approval from the City Attorney; and (5) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute Contract amendments up to 15% ($15,000) of the value of the Contract.

13. Finance
CONSIDERATION OF THE TREASURER’S QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT ON THE CITY’S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2023 Objective: The purpose of this report is to provide the City Council with the Treasurer’s quarterly report on the City’s investment portfolio for the quarter ending June 30, 2023 as outlined by the Government Code 53646(b)(1).
4 Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council receive and file the Treasurer’s Quarterly Financial Report on the City’s investment portfolio for the period ending June 30, 2023.

14. Finance
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-77 APPROVING THE ESCHEATMENT AND TRANSFER OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 50050- 50057
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to approve the escheatment and transfer of unclaimed funds in accordance with California Government Code Sections 50050-50057.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 23-77 approving the escheatment and transfer of unclaimed funds in accordance with California Government Code Sections 50050-50057.

15. Fire
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-74 AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL FUNDING TO THE

FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW/INSPECTION SERVICES Objective: The purpose of this item requests City Council adoption of a resolution authorizing additional funding to the Fire Department for construction plan review and inspection services.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends the City Council to adopt Resolution 23-74 authorizing additional funding to the Fire Department for construction plan review and inspection services.

16. Parks & Recreation
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-69 AMENDING THE CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) AND AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO B & M

BUILDERS, INC FOR THE RECREATION CENTER TENNIS COURTS LIGHTING AND DRAINAGE PROJECT (CIP 62143)
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide sufficient information to the City Council for adoption of Resolution 23-69 amending the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and to award a construction contract to B & M Builders, Inc for the Recreation Center Tennis Courts Lighting and Drainage Project (CIP 62143).

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Adopt Resolution 23- 69 amending the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the additional funding needed to complete the Recreation Center Tennis Courts Lighting and Drainage Project (CIP 62143); (2) Award a construction contract to B & M Builders, Inc in an amount not to exceed $1,227,002 for the Recreation Center Tennis Courts Lighting and Drainage Project); (3) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with B & M Builders, Inc in the amount of $1,227,002; (4) Authorize the City Manager, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the contract 5 with B & M Builders, Inc with approval from the City Attorney; and (5) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute contract amendments up to 10% ($122,700) of the value of the contract.

17. Police
CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF THE FISCAL YEAR 23/24 OTS STEP GRANT AND

TRAFFIC RECORDS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AWARDS AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-56 APPROVING FOR BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FOR OTS OPERATIONS AND

EQUIPMENT
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with information needed to consider acceptance of the FY 23/24 California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) grant award for $83,800, which will fund overtime and equipment, and the Traffic Records Improvement Project grant award for $24,800, which will fund the purchase of software to electronically report collision data to the State database.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends the Council: (1) Adopt Resolution 23-56 authorizing the acceptance of the FY 23/24 California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) grant award for $83,800 and the Traffic Records Improvement Project grant award for $24,800; and (2) Authorize the City Manager or designee to sign the contracts for the equipment purchases related to the grant.

18. Police

CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE ICU TECHNOLOGIES EVOVL WEAPONS DETECTION SYSTEM PROPOSAL AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-72 APPROVING

BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PROPOSAL
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council information needed to consider approval of the ICU Technologies Evolve weapons detection system proposal and appropriations of $52,953 (one-time) and $13,968 (annual ongoing) from the Measure N Fund, Public Safety category for a four-year Evolv user agreement.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends the Council: (1) Adopt resolution 23-72 authorizing the acceptance of the ICU Technologies Evolv weapons detection system proposal and the appropriation of $52,953 of one-time expense in FY 2023/24 and $13,968 of ongoing annual expense in FYs 2023/24 and 2024/25 from the Measure N Fund, Public Safety Category; and (2) Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute a contract with ICU Technologies for equipment and software subscription.

19. Police

CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT AWARD AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-38 APPROVING BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FOR BOMB

SQUAD EQUIPMENT
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with information needed to consider acceptance of the FY 2021 Sacramento Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) award for $82,000 to provide specialized equipment for use by the Yolo County Bomb Squad.
6 Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends the Council: (1) Authorize the acceptance of the $82,000 FY 2021 Sacramento Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) grant award and adopt Resolution 23-38 appropriating funds for the purchase of the associated equipment; and (2) Authorize the City Manager or designee to sign the contracts for the equipment purchases related to the grant.

20. Public Works
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-58 AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET AND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT 1 FOR THE SUMMIT

PIPELINES CONTRACT FOR THE CLOSED CIRCUIT TV (CCTV) INSPECTION & CLEANING OF SEWERS PROJECT (CIP 33029)
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to consider adoption of Resolution 23-58 amending the Capital Improvement Program and approval of contract amendment 1 to the Summit Pipelines contract for CCTV Inspection and Cleaning of Sewers.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Find that the CCTV Inspection & Cleaning of Sewers Project is exempt from CEQA analysis under the Class 1 Categorical Exemption, under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Article 19, Section 15301; (2) Adopt Resolution 23-58 amending the Capital Improvement Program; AND (3) Delegate authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendment 1 with Summit Pipelines for an amount not to exceed $33,327 for the CCTV Inspection & Cleaning of Sewers Project t (CIP 33029); and (3) 3) Delegate authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Contract Amendment 1 with Summit Pipelines for an amount not to exceed $33,327 for the CCTV Inspection & Cleaning of Sewers Project (CIP 33029).

21. City Manager's Office
REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY I-B-7 AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 23-10 BANNING WEAPONS FROM CITY FACILITIES Objective: This report requests Council approval of Administrative Policy I-B-7, which would ban weapons from City Facilities on an interim basis, and first reading of Ordinance 23-10, which would ban weapons from City facilities permanently.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully requests that the Council: (1) Approve interim Administrative Policy I-B-7 , which would immediately ban weapons from City facilities; (2) Waive first reading and read by title and only Ordinance 23-10, which would create an ongoing ban on weapons in City facilities; and (3) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to take any actions necessary to effectuate the security measures necessary to effectuate Administrative Policy I-B-7 and Ordinance 23-10, including but not limited to drafting of operational protocols governing the use of scanning devices to protect resident security in City buildings, subject to approval by the City Attorney.

22. City Manager's Office
7 CONSIDERATION OF UPDATES AND APPROVAL OF JOB DESCRIPTIONS, UPDATES TO THE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24, UPDATES TO ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY IV-B-10, UPDATES TO THE AUTHORIZED POSITION LIST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24, AND RESOLUTION 23-78 APPROVING RELATED BUDGET

APPROPRIATIONS
Objective: The purpose of this report is to provide sufficient information for the City Council to consider updates to the publicly available pay schedule (Classification Plan) for FY 2023/24, the revised Authorized Position List for FY 2023/24, approval of Resolution 22-78 allocating budget for the proposed changes, updates and approval of job descriptions, and Administrative Policy IV-B10.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Approve the amended job description for the Capital Improvement Manager; (2) Approve the job description for Construction Inspection Manager; (3) Approve the job description for Construction Inspector I/II/III; (4) Approve the amended and updated Authorized Position List (APL) for Fiscal Year 2023/24; (5) Approve the amended and updated publicly available pay schedule (Classification Plan) for Fiscal Year 2023/24; (6) Approve Administrative Policy IV-B-10, Travel, Meals & Related Expense Reimbursement Policy for Elected & Appointed Officials; and (7) Approve Resolution 23- 78 authorizing budget appropriations to fund the changes proposed in the revised APL, and revised Classification Plan.

23. City Manager's Office

CONSIDERATION OF AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF YOLO FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Objective: The purpose of this report is to seek City Council approval of an agreement with the County of Yolo for animal control services for fiscal year 2023-24.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the attached 1-year, $943,029 agreement with the County of Yolo for animal control services for fiscal year 2023-24.

24. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 16, 2023 REGULAR

MEETING OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR

AGENCY, AND WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with the draft minutes of the August 16, 2023 Regular Meetings of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve the minutes of the August 16, 2023 Regular Meetings of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
8 25. Economic Development & Housing
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-71 APPROVING THE

ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $35,000,000 TO FINANCE AND REFINANCE THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, DEVELOPMENT AND EQUIPPING OF THE 219-221 5TH

STREET APARTMENTS
Objective: To provide the City Council with sufficient information to adopt Resolution 23-71 approving the issuance of revenue bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority in an amount not to exceed $35 million to finance and refinance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of the 219-221 5th Street Apartments.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing under the Tax and Equity Responsibility Act and, upon closing the hearing, approve Resolution 23- 71 approving the issuance of revenue bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority in an amount not to exceed $35 million to finance and refinance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of the 219-221 5th Street Apartments.

26. Community Development
PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-70 APPROVING THE RIVER

ONE PHASE TWO DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESIGN
Objective: This item requests consideration of Resolution 23-70 which approves the proposed River One Phase Two project design and finds it is compliant with the collective standards as defined in the Raley’s Landing: River One Development Agreement.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council conduct the public hearing, find that the River One Phase Two project design Project is covered by the Raley’s Landing Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and that none of the conditions specified in CEQA Guidelines §15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred and approve Resolution 23- 70, approving the proposed design of the River One Phase Two project as required by the Development Agreement

REGULAR AGENDA

27. Community Development

PUBLIC WORKSHOP REGARDING RETAIL CANNABIS SALES ADMINISTRATIVE

PROCEDURES AND EQUITY PILOT PROGRAM
Objective: The purpose of this report is to facilitate City Council consideration and direction regarding proposed administrative procedures for retail cannabis applications and the equity pilot program.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council hear a presentation from staff regarding the proposed administrative procedures and equity pilot program and provide direction to staff.
9 28. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 23-8 AMENDING THE WEST SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL CODE TO MEMORIALIZE THE COUNCIL’S ONE CITY

GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK
Objective: This report requests that the Council consider first reading of Ordinance 23-8, which would amend Section 2.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code to add language embodying the Council’s One City governance framework.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council waive first reading and read by title only Ordinance 23-8 amending Section 2.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code to include the Council’s One City governance framework.

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART II

29. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS
Bikeshare Policy Steering Committee --------------------------------------------Guerrero, Alternate - Early City/County 2x2 ----------------------------------------------------Guerrero/Orozco, Alternate – Sulpizio Hull City/School 2x2 ------------------------------------------------------Guerrero/Sulpizio Hull, Alternate - Alcala Executive Commission to Address Homelessness --------------------Sulpizio Hull, Alternate - Orozco EIFD Public Financing Authority----------------------------------------------------Vacant, Alternate - Vacant League of California Cities --------------------------------------------------- Alcala, Alternate – Sulpizio Hull Local Agency Formation Commission ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Alcala Port District Commission ---------------------------------------------------------Guerrero, Early, Sulpizio Hull Remote Access Network ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Guerrero River City Regional Stadium Financing Authority------------------------------------------Guerrero, Orozco Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) ------------------------Guerrero; Alternate - Early Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District Board --------------Orozco; Alternate - Sulpizio Hull West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency JPA ----------------------------Alcala; Alternate - Orozco Yolo County Housing Authority-------------------------------------------------Early, Alternate - Sulpizio Hull Yolo Transportation District -----------------------------------------------------Early, Alternate - Sulpizio Hull Yolo Habitat Conservancy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sulpizio Hull Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District ----------------------------Alcala; Alternate – Sulpizio Hull Yolo Subbasin Sustainable Groundwater Agency-------------------------Sulpizio Hull; Alternate - Early

COUNCIL INTERMEDIARY REPRESENTATIVES
Delta Protection Commission -------------------------------------------------------Vacant; Alternate - Vacant New Hope Community Development Corporation---------------------------------Early; Alternate - Alcala Yolo County Consolidated Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board--------Sulpizio Hull

30. COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS, REAPPOINTMENTS, REMOVALS TO/FROM CITY AND NONCITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

31. PART II
A. Council Calendar
B. City Manager Report
10 C. City Attorney Report
D. Staff Direction from City Council Members
E. Future Agenda Item Requests by Council
F. Request from Councilmember Sulpizio Hull: Include Proclamation for Pregnancy and Infant Loss Awareness Month on the October 18 agenda
G. Adjourn
I, Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk, declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the September 27, 2023 regular and closed session meetings of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency and Financing Authority was posted September 22, 2023 at the rear entrance at City Hall, 1110 West Capitol Avenue, West Sacramento, CA and was available for public review.

NOTE: If you challenge the nature of a proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.

The agenda and agenda reports are also available on the City’s website at www.cityofwestsacramento.org City Council meetings are broadcast live on Wave Cable Channel 20 and rerun the next day at 12:00 PM and the following Saturday at 6:00 PM.

All public materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are also made available for public inspection on the City’s website at:
www.cityofwestsacramento.org. Any document provided at the meeting by staff or by the public will be provided by the City Clerk upon request by phone at (916) 617-4500, or by email at: [email protected].

If you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 916-617- 4500 or [email protected]. Notify the City Clerk’s Office at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting. Assisted listening devices are available at this meeting. 11 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: September 27, 2023 ITEM # 2
SUBJECT:

PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

HONORING THE LIFE AND LEGACY OF YOLO COUNTY SUPERVISOR GARY SANDY INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [ X ] Staff
[ ] Other
Meaghan Stiles, Program Manager
City Manager’s Office
ATTACHMENT [X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [ X ] Action

OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this report and proclamation is to recognize Supervisor Gary Sandy for his years in public service and celebrate the legacy of dedication and compassion for others he leaves behind.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the West Sacramento City Council adopt a proclamation honoring the life and legacy of Yolo County Supervisor Gary Sandy.

BACKGROUND
Gary Sandy, Yolo County Supervisor, died on August 17, 2023, after battling liver cancer. Over the years, Supervisor Sandy served the community in various roles, including Woodland City Council member, Woodland Mayor, and Yolo County Supervisor. His work covered areas such as water conservation, tech advancement, mental health support in schools, agricultural land preservation, air quality improvement, homelessness, and economic growth. Supervisor Sandy represented District 3 in Yolo County, which includes much of the Bryte and Broderick neighborhoods in West Sacramento.

ANALYSIS
Supervisor Sandy was a beloved figure in the community who was known for his generosity, wisdom, and the ability to bring people together. He is survived by his wife of forty years, Mary Vixie Sandy, their three children, and two grandchildren with another on the way.

The passing of Supervisor Sandy is an immeasurable loss to the community, but his legacy will forever inspire the continuation the work he championed. His dedication, compassion, and unwavering commitment to making a positive impact on the lives of others will be remembered for generations to come.

Environmental Considerations
N/A
Commission Recommendation
N/A
Strategic Plan Integration
N/A
Alternatives
N/A
Coordination and Review
N/A
Budget/Cost Impact
N/A

ATTACHMENT
Proclamation
12 PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

HONORING THE LIFE AND LEGACY OF YOLO COUNTY SUPERVISOR GARY SANDY WHEREAS, Supervisor Gary Sandy passed away unexpectedly on August 17, 2023, following complications from a courageous battle with liver cancer; and WHEREAS, at the time of his death, Supervisor Sandy was serving as Vice Chair of the Yolo County Board of Supervisors, representing District 3, which includes much of the Bryte and Broderick neighborhoods in West Sacramento; and
WHEREAS, Supervisor Sandy, who was a former Woodland Mayor, was elected to the Yolo County Board of Supervisors in 2018, serving as Chair of the Board in 2020, and had previously served on the Woodland City Council, the Yuba Community College Board, and Yolo County Fair Board; and
WHEREAS, throughout his tenure on the Board of Supervisors and until the time of his death, Supervisor Sandy championed water conservation and worked to preserve native habitats and wetland ecosystems, serving as the Board’s representative to the Yolo County Water Resources Association and the Yolo Subbasin Groundwater Agency; and WHEREAS, Supervisor Sandy was also a vocal supporter of improved technological infrastructure in the county, mental health resources in schools, ag land preservation, protecting air quality, addressing the issues of homelessness and exploring avenues for economic development that are compatible with the community’s values and way of life; and WHEREAS, Supervisor Sandy brought to the Board his pragmatism, compassion, and astute voice of wisdom as a dedicated public servant and community advocate; and WHEREAS, Supervisor Sandy’s leadership and commitment to fostering collaboration were instrumental in improving the quality of life for many West Sacramento residents, and creating a stronger and more united Yolo County; and
WHEREAS, after decades of public service, Supervisor Sandy leaves behind a tremendous legacy of accomplishments benefiting the residents of Yolo County and beyond, while his memory provides a lasting model of unselfish, thoughtful, and generous service to all who were fortunate enough to work with or around him.

NOW, THERERFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of West Sacramento celebrates the life and accomplishments of Supervisor Gary Sandy and expresses its appreciation for his life of service. The City of West Sacramento extends its condolences to Supervisor Sandy’s family, and to his many friends, for the profound loss that they have experienced, and proclaims its enduring gratitude for all that Supervisor Sandy has given to West Sacramento and to the greater Yolo County community.

PROCLAIMED this 9th day of September 2023.

ATTEST:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Martha Guerrero, Mayor
13 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: September 27, 2023 ITEM # 3
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF A COUNCIL PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING

HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[X] Council [ ] Staff
[ ] Other
Paul Hosley, Public Information Officer
City Manager’s Office
ATTACHMENT [ X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [ X ] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to formally recognize the culture and contributions of Hispanic community members to the City of West Sacramento.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt a proclamation declaring September 15 to October 15, 2023 as Hispanic Heritage Month.

BACKGROUND
Each year, Americans observe National Hispanic Heritage Month from September 15 to October 15, by celebrating the histories, cultures, and contributions of American citizens whose ancestors came from Spain, Mexico, the Caribbean and Central and South America.

The observation started in 1968 as Hispanic Heritage Week under President Lyndon Johnson and was expanded by President Ronald Reagan in 1988 to cover a 30-day period starting on September 15 and ending on October

15. It was enacted into law on August 17, 1988 on the approval of Public Law 100-402.

According to the 2020 Census, the Hispanic population of the United States is 62.1 million, constituting 18.7% of the total population. In California there are 15.5 million Hispanic residents or 39.4% of the state’s population.

In Yolo County 69 thousand identify as Hispanic, or 31.7%. Hispanics in our community include restaurant and business owners, contractors, engineers, doctors, lawyers, teachers, students, childcare providers, City staff and politicians among other occupations.

ANALYSIS
Hispanics continue their rich tradition of significant and diverse contributions to the cultural, educational, economic, social and political vitality of our community. Four out of five West Sacramento City Council members are of Hispanic background. The 2020 Census shows 17.5 thousand West Sacramento residents are of Hispanic origin, or 32.6% of the population.

Adoption of this proclamation will signify the City’s appreciation for our Hispanic and Spanish speaking population and serve to honor this segment of our community.

Environmental Considerations
N/A
Commission Recommendation
N/A
Strategic Plan Integration
Adoption of this proclamation supports the City Council’s Strategic Principle of “Inclusive and Diverse” to cultivate an organization that reflects our community’s diversity.

Alternatives
N/A
Coordination and Review
N/A
14 Proclamation to Recognize Hispanic Heritage Month
September 27, 2023

Budget/Cost Impact
N/A

ATTACHMENT
Proclamation
15 PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNTIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

RECOGNIZING HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH
WHEREAS, the City of West Sacramento is a diverse and inclusive community that values the contributions of all its residents; and
WHEREAS, National Hispanic Heritage Month, established in 1988, is an opportunity to celebrate the rich cultural traditions and honor the significant achievements of our Hispanic, Latina/Latino and Latin American communities; and
WHEREAS, Hispanic and Latino Americans have made enormous contributions by sharing their talents, culture, traditions, their deep connection to family values and a commitment to faith, and a desire to live the American dream; and WHEREAS, according to the 2020 Census, more than 32% of West Sacramento residents identify as Hispanic or Latina/Latino; and
WHEREAS, four out of five City Councilmembers are of Hispanic or Latina/Latino descent and many City staff identify as Latina/Latino; and WHEREAS, Hispanics and Latinos have played a pivotal role in shaping the City of West Sacramento, contributing to its vibrant arts, business, education, and community life, enriching our city's social fabric; and
WHEREAS, the City Council encourages residents and community organizations to participate in events, activities, and educational programs that promote the understanding and appreciation of Hispanic and Latino culture and heritage during this special month and throughout the year; and
WHEREAS, the City of West Sacramento is proud to honor the history and contributions of Hispanics in our community and throughout our state and our Nation.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of West Sacramento does hereby recognize September 15 to October 15, 2023 as “Hispanic Heritage Month.”
PROCLAIMED THIS 27th day of September 2023
ATTEST:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Martha Guerrero, Mayor
16 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: September 27, 2023 ITEM # 4
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT 2 TO A CONTRACT FOR SERVICES

WITH DISABILITY ACCESS CONSULTANTS
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [ x ] Staff
[ ] Other
Victoria Soares, Administrative Analyst II
Capital Projects Department
ATTACHMENT [ x ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [ x ] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to approve Amendment 2 to the Contract for Services with Disability Access Consultants to provide ADA compliance, coordination, and consultation services.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1) Approve Amendment 2 to the Contract for Services with Disability Access Consultants for the amount of $79,500; and
2) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendments or change orders up to 15% ($19,350) of the contract value.

BACKGROUND
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 has been hailed as one of the most significant civil rights laws since the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The ADA recognizes and protects the civil rights of people with disabilities and is modeled after earlier landmark laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race and gender. While the ADA has five separate titles, Title II is the section specifically applicable to programs, services, and activities provided by state and local governments. Generally, Title II of the ADA requires a public entity to make reasonable changes to policies, ensure effective communication with people with disabilities, and provide physical access to buildings, facilities, and programs with the goal of ensuring meaningful access to all its services and offerings.

This requirement extends not only to physical access to facilities, programs, and events, but also to pedestrian facilities in public rights-of-way. In addition, Title II of the ADA requires public entities to develop an ADA Transition Plan documenting evaluations and inspections of programs, services, activities and facilities to document the entity’s plan to address physical or programmatic barriers. The Transition Plan isn’t required to be updated at any specific interval; however, it should be updated periodically to ensure the ongoing needs of the community continue to be met. The City’s most recent Transition Plan update was completed in 2019.

In May 2022, the City lost its ability to provide ADA compliance and coordination due to internal attrition. On May 30, 2022, the City executed a contract with Disability Access Consultants (DAC) in an effort to maintain ADA compliance. DAC was selected because they had conducted the City’s most recent ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update in 2019. DAC’s experience and familiarity with the City’s ADA compliance efforts helped bridge the gap and provided the City time to re-evaluate internal capacity and assess the effectiveness of the service contract. Since the beginning of the contract, DAC has successfully assisted the City with reviewing and updating ADA notices, postings, policies, procedures and practices, and performed ADA inspections for various Capital Improvement Projects.

ANALYSIS
Amendment 1 extended the contract term with DAC through June 2024, however, additional funds were not added to the contract at that time. Amendment 2 will add additional funds to the contract allowing the City to continue utilizing DAC’s expertise in maintaining ADA compliance and performing ADA inspections for City projects. A separate Request for Proposals will be issued in late 2023 or early 2024 for the City’s next ADA Transition Plan Update.

Environmental Considerations
This action is not a project that is subject to CEQA because it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21065; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15060(c), 15378(a).)
17 Amendment 2 - Disability Access Consultants Contract September 27, 2023

Commission Recommendation
Not Applicable.

Strategic Plan Integration
Not Applicable.

Alternatives
The Council’s primary alternatives are summarized below:

1. Approve the recommended actions as described above.

2. Reject the recommended actions or direct staff to alter the project.

Alternative 1 is recommended because it provides the City with a consultant that possesses the expertise and experience to continue assisting the City with required ADA compliance.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Capital Projects Department in coordination with and review by the Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
ADA Compliance & Accessibility Improvements are included in the current Capital Improvement Program as CIP 52241. Adequate funding is available in the CIP project budget for the recommended action and no additional funding is required or being requested at this time.

ATTACHMENTS
1) Disability Access Consultants Amendment 2
18 Disability Access Consultants
CPC22-148 ADA Compliance
Expires 6/29/2024
AMENDMENT NO. 2
to the

CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
between the

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
And

DISABILITY ACCESS CONSULTANTS
Dated May 30, 2022
This Amendment No. 2 to the Contract for Services between the City of West Sacramento and Disability Access Consultants dated May 30, 2022, is made and entered into this 27th day of September, 2023. Except as expressly amended herein, the May 30, 2022 Contract for Services is in full force and effect.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City and Contractor entered into the Contract for Services for Contractor to provide ADA coordination and compliance services to adhere with requirements as federally mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title IV-A; and WHEREAS, additional scope and funds are necessary to complete the requirements for ADA compliance.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by parties hereto to amend said agreement as follows:

I. SCOPE OF WORK:

The scope of work as set forth in the Contract for Services dated May 30, 2022 shall be modified as outlined in Exhibit A.

II. COMPENSATION:

The compensation as set forth in the Contract for Services shall be increased by $79,500 and total compensation shall not exceed $129,000.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as the date herein set forth.

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
By:

Aaron Laurel, City Manager

DISABILITY ACCESS CONSULTANTS
By:

Tim Mahoney, General Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM
By:

Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney
19 Disability Access Consultants
CPC22-148 ADA Compliance
Expires 6/29/2024
ATTEST:

By: ________________________________________________________ Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
20 City of West Sacramento ADA Services Proposal August 2023 Page 1 of 2 Exhibit A – Scope
DAC Services/Deliverables

1. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Accessibility Compliance Support Services (Fixed Fee)
DAC would assist the City of West Sacramento by providing ADA compliance functions, services, reporting and tasks to the City. DAC services would include, but are not limited to:
 Scheduled monthly progress and updated meetings
 Continue to collaborate, review and update of City’s accessibility policies, procedures and practices
 Build action plans with City to track and monitor policy and procedure updates  Assist City with public accommodation requests and review  Continue to collaborate with City on accommodation solutions: (braille, TTY, ASL interpreter, etc)
 Continue review and update accessibility notices and postings  Quarterly review of City’s website and report of compliance with WCAG 2.1 AA standards
 RFP Budget development: Assist City with development of budget for an updated and comprehensive ADA Transition Plan RFP
 DACTrak Data entry: Where applicable, monthly updating of transition plan within the DACTrak Accessibility Management Software with completed dates of barrier removal
 Monthly Progress Report: Provide City with monthly progress report of accomplishments and status of efforts completed toward action plan and other assigned projects.
 Annual summary and report of progress and future plans Monthly Fixed Services Budget: $1900, monthly, $24,700 for contract term

2. Accessibility Services (On-call, as-needed)
Disability Access Consultants, LLC (DAC) will provide the following “on-call” services, including but not limited to the following, as requested by City of West Sacramento (City).  Review and provide recommendations for projects, including but not limited to; new construction projects, remodeling projects and providing input on project plans and specifications
 Staff Training
 On-site accessibility inspections, as requested.
 Review construction design standards and make recommendations for revisions  Other ADA and accessibility related consulting services, as requested General On-Call Services Budget: $54,800 (as needed for contract term) 21 City of West Sacramento ADA Services Proposal August 2023 Page 2 of 2 Compensation
As this is an agreement for both on-call consultation and fixed fee for services, the exact level of effort and specific activities to complete the scope of work cannot be identified at this time.

Compensation for fixed services will be invoiced monthly. On-call consultant services will be on an as-needed basis and will be invoiced at the end of the month services were completed.

Please see the attached hourly rate schedule for DAC to complete on-call services. All expenses are included in the hourly rate.

DAC Hourly Rate Sheet
Title
Off -Site
Hourly Rate
On-Site
Hourly Rate
Project Manager Barb Thorpe 170 190
Senior Director of Accessibility Services & CASp Mike Boga 170 190 General Manager Tim Mahoney 120 140
Director of Administrative Services Jennie Grover 110 130 Director of Accessibility Services Candice Pursch 100 120 Accessibility Specialists Various 110
Information Technology Specialist, if requested Sri Talasila 110 N/A 22 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: September 27, 2023 ITEM # 5

CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF A CONTRACT TO HITOUCH SERVICES FOR THE FURNITURE AND WORKSTATIONS FOR THE FIRE STATION 45 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (CIP 51278)
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [ X ] Staff
[ ] Other
Christopher Dority, Project Manager II
Capital Projects Department
ATTACHMENT [ X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [ X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide City Council with sufficient information to award a Contract to HiTouch Services for the purchase and assembly of furniture and workstations for the Fire Station 45 Improvements Project (CIP 51278).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1) Award a Contract to HiTouch Services for the purchase and assembly of furniture and workstations for the Fire Station 45 Improvements Project utilizing the Sourcewell Cooperative agreement; 2) Delegate authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with HiTouch Services in an amount not to exceed $130,605.87; and
3) Delegate authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments or contract change orders up to 15% ($19,590) of the total contract amount.

BACKGROUND
The Fire Station 45 facility is located at 2040 Lake Washington Boulevard and was constructed in 2006. It serves as the Fire Administration Division facility for the City. The Fire Administration Division houses all Fire administrative staff, including all Chiefs that oversee and manage the Fire Department's daily operations.

Personnel, training, buildings and grounds, purchasing, fiscal management, administrative and clerical support, records management, and research and data collection are provided to the Fire Department by its Administration Division. Capital Projects staff has worked with Fire personnel to address all areas of concern in the administrative staff work area. Over the years, the facility has shown significant signs of wear and tear including dated carpet which is past its useful life and worn-out workstations. This repair project includes drywall and crack repairs, new paint, new carpet, and new furniture and workstations. The drywall, crack repairs, paint and carpet are being completed by a separate contract with Pro-Builders that was approved by August 17, 2023.

ANALYSIS
On January 12 2023, HiTouch was contacted concerning the design, supply and installation of new furniture and workstations for the Fire Station 45 Improvements Project. The project will be utilizing the Sourcewell cooperative agreement of which HiTouch is a member. On August 24, 2023, a final design was approved, and a quote was provided. City Staff completed a review of the quote by comparing it to previous similar projects, including the City Hall Annex Furniture project (CIP 54019), and determined that the quote was fair, reasonable and in line with previous similar projects.

Environmental Considerations
The Fire Station 45 Improvements Project (CIP 51278) has previously been deemed exempt by the City Council on May 17, 2023, (CEQA categorical exemptions under California Code of Regulation, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (“CEQA guidelines”)) Sections 15301, 15303, and 15304 (Existing Facilities).

Strategic Plan Integration
Not applicable.

Alternatives
The Council’s primary alternatives include:
1) Approve the recommended actions as stated above.
2) Modify or delay the recommended actions.
3) Deny the recommended actions, reject contract and cancel project. 23 Award of Construction Contract to HiTouch Services (CIP 51278) September 27, 2023

Alternatives 2 and 3 are not recommended because of the poor condition of the internal furnishings at Fire Station 45 and the need to provide modern, functional and comfortable furniture and workstations.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Capital Projects Department in coordination with and reviewed by the Fire Department and Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
This Project is included in the approved Capital Improvement Program (CIP number 51278). Sufficient funds are available in the project budget for the recommended actions and no additional budget appropriations are required or requested at this time.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Contract with HiTouch Services
24 Attachment 1
HiTouch Services
CPC23-217– Fire Station 45 Improvements
Expires on 09/05/2024
Federal 081623

CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
THIS CONTRACT is made on September 27, 2023, by and between the CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (“City”), and HiTouch Services (“Consultant”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the City desires HiTouch Business Services, LLC to provide office furniture for the City of West Sacramento Fire Station 45 Improvements Project (CIP 51278); WHEREAS, the Consultant has presented a proposal for such services to the City, dated August 4, 2023, (attached hereto as Exhibit “A”) and is duly licensed, qualified and experienced to perform those services;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES:

A. Consultant shall do all work, attend all meetings, produce all reports and carry out all activities necessary to completion of the services described in Exhibit “A” This Contract and its exhibits shall be known as the “Contract Documents.” Terms set forth in any Contract Document shall be deemed to be incorporated in all Contract Documents as if set forth in full therein. In the event of conflict between terms contained in these Contract Documents, the more specific term shall control. If any portion of the Contract Documents shall be in conflict with any other portion, provisions contained in the Contract shall govern over conflicting provisions contained in the exhibits to the Contract.

B. Consultant enters into this Contract as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City. The Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Contract to bind the City in any respect. Nothing in this Contract shall be construed to be inconsistent with this relationship or status. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by the Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of the Consultant and not of the City. The City shall not be obligated in any way to pay any wage claims or other claims made against Consultant by any such employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, or any other person resulting from performance of this Contract.

C. The Consultant agrees it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

2. TERM OF CONTRACT
A. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Contract , and shall be undertaken and completed in accordance with the Scope of Work attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit “A” and terminate on September 5, 2024.

B. Consultant’s failure to complete work in accordance with the Schedule of Performance may result in delayed compensation as described in Section 3. 25 Attachment 1
HiTouch Services
CPC23-217– Fire Station 45 Improvements
Expires on 09/05/2024
Federal 081623
C. The City Manager or his or her designee may, by written instrument signed by the Parties, extend the duration of this Contract for a period of 1 year in the manner provided in Section 5, provided that the extension does not require the payment of compensation in excess of the maximum compensation set forth in Section 3, Compensation.

3. COMPENSATION:

A. The Consultant shall be paid at the completion of services for the actual fees, costs and expenses for all time and materials required and expended, but in no event shall total compensation exceed One Hundred Thirty Thousand Six hundred Five Dollars and Eighty Seven Cents ($130,605.87), without City’s prior written approval. Consultant's fees shall be as specified in the Schedule of Fees, which is attached hereto an incorporated herein as Exhibit “A".

B. Said amount shall be paid upon submittal of a final billing. Consultant shall furnish City with invoices for all expenses as well as for all materials authorized by this Contract. The invoices shall be submitted with the final billings. If Consultant’s performance is not in conformity with the Schedule of Performance, payments may be delayed or denied, unless the Consultant’s failure to perform in conformity with the Schedule of Performance is a documented result of the City’s failure to conform with the Schedule of Performance, or if the Schedule of Performance is extended pursuant to Section 5.

C. If the work is halted at the request of the City, compensation shall be based upon the proportion that the work performed bears to the total work required by this Contract, subject to Section 4.

4. TERMINATION:

A. This Contract may be terminated by either party, provided that the other party is given not less than 30 calendar days’ written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate.

B. The City may temporarily suspend this Contract, at no additional cost to City, provided that the Consultant is given written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of temporary suspension. If City gives such notice of temporary suspension, Consultant shall immediately suspend its activities under this Contract.

C. Notwithstanding any provisions of this Contract, Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this Contract by Consultant, and the City may withhold any payments due to Consultant until such time as the exact amount of damages, if any, due the City from Consultant is determined.

D. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be compensated as provided for in this Contract, except as provided in Section 4C. Upon termination, the City shall be entitled to all work, including but not limited to, appraisals, inventories, studies, analyses, drawings and data estimates performed to that date in accordance with Section 7 hereof.

5. AMENDMENTS, CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS:
26 Attachment 1
HiTouch Services
CPC23-217– Fire Station 45 Improvements
Expires on 09/05/2024
Federal 081623
Amendments, changes or modifications in the terms of this Contract may be made at any time by mutual written agreement between the parties hereto and shall be signed by the persons authorized to bind the parties hereto.

6. EXTENSIONS OF TIME:

Consultant may, for good cause, request extensions of time to perform the services required hereunder. Such extensions shall be authorized in advance by the City in writing and shall be incorporated in written amendments to this Contract or the attached Work Program in the manner provided in Section 5.

7. PROPERTY OF CITY:

A. It is mutually agreed that all materials prepared by the Consultant under this Contract shall become the property of the City, and the Consultant shall have no property right therein whatsoever. Immediately upon termination, the City shall be entitled to, and the Consultant shall deliver to the City, all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and other such materials as may have been prepared or accumulated to date by the Consultant in performing this Contract which is not Consultant’s privileged information, as defined by law, or Consultant’s personnel information, along with all other property belonging exclusively to the City which is in the Consultant’s possession.

B. Additionally, it is agreed that the parties intend this to be a contract for services and each considers the products and results of the services to be rendered by Consultant hereunder (the “Work”) to be a work made for hire. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that the Work (and all rights therein, including, without limitation, copyright) belongs to and shall be the sole and exclusive property of the City.

8. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS:

A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of federal, State and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Contract. It shall be City’s responsibility to obtain all rights of way and easements to enable Consultant to perform its services hereunder.

Consultant shall assist City in providing the same.

B. Consultant warrants to the City that it is licensed by all applicable governmental bodies to perform this Contract and will remain so licensed throughout the progress of the Work, and that it has, and will have, throughout the progress of the Work, the necessary experience, skill and financial resources to enable it to perform this Contract.

C. The work contemplated under this Contract is a public work for the purposes of Labor Code section 1720, and is subject to the payment of prevailing wages. Accordingly, Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Exhibit "___".]

9. WARRANTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES - CONSULTANT:

A. Consultant agrees and represents that it is qualified to properly provide the services set forth in Exhibit “A” in a manner which is consistent with the generally accepted standards of Consultant’s profession.
27 Attachment 1
HiTouch Services
CPC23-217– Fire Station 45 Improvements
Expires on 09/05/2024
Federal 081623
B. Consultant agrees and represents that the work performed under this Contract shall be in accordance with applicable federal, State and local law in accordance with Section 17A hereof.

C. Consultant shall designate a project manager who at all times shall represent the Consultant before the City on all matters relating to this Contract. The project manager shall continue in such capacity unless and until he or she is removed at the request of the City, is no longer employed by Consultant, or is replaced with the written approval of the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.

D. Consultant shall provide corrective services without charge to the City for services which fail to meet the above professional and legal standards and which are reported to Consultant in writing within sixty (60) days of discovery. Should Consultant fail or refuse to perform promptly its obligations, the City may render or undertake performance thereof and the Consultant shall be liable for any expenses thereby incurred.

10. SUBCONTRACTING:

None of the services covered by this Contract shall be subcontracted without the prior written consent of the City, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Consultant shall be as fully responsible to the City for the negligent acts and omissions of its contractors and subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as it is for the negligent acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Consultant.

11. ASSIGNABILITY:

Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Contract whether by assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of the City which will not be unreasonably withheld.

However, claims for money due or to become due Consultant from the City under this Contract may be assigned to a financial institution, or to a trustee in bankruptcy, without such approval.

Notice of any assignment or transfer whether voluntary or involuntary shall be furnished promptly to the City.

12. INTEREST IN CONTRACT:

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any of its employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the subject of the Contract, nor any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of its services hereunder. Consultant shall make all disclosures required by the City’s conflict of interest code in accordance with the category designated by the City, unless the City Manager determines in writing that Consultant’s duties are more limited in scope than is warranted by the category designated by the City code and that a narrower disclosure category should apply. Consultant also agrees to make disclosure in compliance with the City conflict of interest code if, at any time after the execution of this Contract, City determines and notifies Consultant in writing that Consultant’s duties under this Contract warrant greater disclosure by Consultant than was originally contemplated. Consultant shall make disclosures in the time, place and manner set forth in the conflict of interest code and as directed by the City.

13. MATERIALS CONFIDENTIAL:

All of the materials prepared or assembled by Consultant pursuant to performance of this 28 Attachment 1
HiTouch Services
CPC23-217– Fire Station 45 Improvements
Expires on 09/05/2024
Federal 081623
Contract are confidential and Consultant agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City, except by court order.

14. LIABILITY OF CONSULTANT-NEGLIGENCE:

Consultant shall be responsible for performing the work under this Contract in a manner which is consistent with the generally-accepted standards of the Consultant’s profession and shall be liable for its own negligence and the negligent acts of its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors. The City shall have no right of control over the manner in which the work is to be done but only as to its outcome, and shall not be charged with the responsibility of preventing risk to Consultant or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors.

15. INDEMNITY AND LITIGATION COSTS:

Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, and employees against all claims, damages, demands, liability, costs, losses and expenses, including without limitation court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising from Consultant's negligent acts or negligent failure to act, errors, omissions or willful misconduct incident to the performance of this Contract except such loss or damage caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive termination or suspension of this Contract.

16. CONSULTANT TO PROVIDE INSURANCE:

A. Consultant shall not commence any work before obtaining, and shall maintain in force at all times during the duration and performance of this Contract, the policies of insurance specified in this Section. Such insurance must have the approval of the City as to limit, form, and amount, and shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A VII (an NR rating is acceptable for Worker’s Compensation insurance written with the State Compensation Insurance Fund of California).

B. Prior to execution of this Contract and prior to commencement of any work, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and copies of endorsements providing evidence of coverage for all policies required by the Contract. The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall, at their expense, maintain in effect at all times during the performance of work under the Contract not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policy satisfactory to the City. The maintenance by Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors of the following coverage and limits of insurance is a material element of this Contract. The failure of Consultant or of any of its contractors or subcontractors to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of this Contract. Approval of the insurance by the City shall not relieve or decrease any liability of Consultant.

1. Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance a. Worker’s Compensation - Insurance to protect the Consultant, its contractors and subcontractors from all claims under Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Acts, including Longshoremen’s and Harbor Worker’s Act (“Acts”), if applicable. Such coverage shall be maintained, in type and amount, in strict compliance with all applicable state and Federal statutes and regulations. 29 Attachment 1
HiTouch Services
CPC23-217– Fire Station 45 Improvements
Expires on 09/05/2024
Federal 081623
The Consultant shall execute a certificate in compliance with Labor Code Section 1861, on the form provided in the Contract Documents.
b. Consultant shall provide a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant.

2. Commercial General Liability Insurance
a. The insurance shall be provided on form CG0001, or its equivalent, and shall include coverage for claims for bodily injury or property damage arising out of premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual liability, and subconsultant’s work and personal and advertising injury resulting from actions, failures to act, or operations of the insured, or by its employees or agents, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the insured. The amount of insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general and products/completed operations aggregates. b. The commercial general liability insurance shall also include the following:
i. Endorsement equivalent to CG 2010 0714 naming the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds. The endorsement shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
ii. Endorsement stating insurance provided to the City shall be primary as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it, to the payment or satisfaction of any defense expenses, loss, or judgment.
iii. Provision or endorsement stating that the Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

3. Commercial Automobile Insurance
a. The insurance shall include, but shall not be limited to, coverage for claims for bodily injury or property damage for owned, non-owned, and hired automobiles resulting from actions, failures to act, or operations of the insured, or by its employees or agents, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the insured. The amount of insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per accident.
30 Attachment 1
HiTouch Services
CPC23-217– Fire Station 45 Improvements
Expires on 09/05/2024
Federal 081623
b. The commercial automobile insurance shall include the same endorsements required for the commercial general liability policy (see Section

16.B.2.b).

4. Professional Liability. The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall secure and maintain in full force, during the term of this Contract and for five years thereafter, professional liability insurance policies appropriate to the respective professions and the work to be performed as specified in this Contract. The limits of such professional liability insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per claim.

C. In addition to any other remedy the City may have, if Consultant fails to maintain the insurance coverage as required in this Section, the City may obtain such insurance coverage as is not being maintained, in form and amount substantially the same as is required herein, and the City may deduct the cost of such insurance from any amounts due or which may become due Consultant under this Contract.

D. No policy required by this Contract shall be suspended, cancelled, terminated by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits unless Consultant has provided thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City.

E. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions in excess of $10,000 must be declared to, and approved by, the City.

F. The requirement as to types, limits, and the City’s approval of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant are not intended to, and shall not in any manner, limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations assumed by Consultant under the Contract.

17. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS:

A. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of, shall observe and comply with, and shall cause any and all persons, firms or corporations employed by it or under its control to observe and comply with, applicable federal, state, county and municipal laws, ordinances, regulations, orders and decrees which in any manner affect those engaged or employed on the work described by this Contract or the materials used or which in any way affect the conduct of the work.

B. Consultant shall not engage in unlawful employment discrimination. Such unlawful employment discrimination includes, but is not limited to, employment discrimination based upon a person’s race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, gender, citizenship, or sexual orientation.

C. FOR WORK FUNDED IN WHOLE OR IN PART FROM GRANT FUNDS . This Contract is funded in whole in part through grant funds received under the following grant: ARPA the “Grant”), the terms of which are incorporated herein. Copies of the Grant and any related materials have been made available to Consultant, and Consultant shall ensure that its performance under this Contract, and that of any subcontractors, conforms to the requirements of the Grant[s].
31 Attachment 1
HiTouch Services
CPC23-217– Fire Station 45 Improvements
Expires on 09/05/2024
Federal 081623
D. Consultant shall maintain and make available for inspection by the City and its auditors accurate records of all of its costs, disbursements and receipts with respect to any work under this Contract. Such inspections may be made during regular office hours at any time until six (6) months after the final payments under this Contract are made to the Consultant.

E. This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relative to the services specified herein and no modification hereof shall be effective unless and until such modification is evidenced by a writing signed by both parties to this Contract. There are no understandings, agreements, conditions, representations, warranties or promises, with respect to this Contract, except those contained in or referred to in the writing.

F. All notices that are required to be given by one party to the other under this Contract shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if delivered personally or enclosed in a properly addressed envelope and deposited in a United States Post Office for delivery by registered or certified mail addressed to the parties at the following addresses:

City:

City of West Sacramento
Attn: Christopher Dority
1110 West Capitol Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Consultant:

Dwayne Deal
Division Vice President - HiTouch Contract Furniture
320 Tech Park Drive Suite 100, Lavergne, TN 37086
C : 864-978-8154
E: [email protected]
G. This Contract shall be interpreted and governed by the laws of the State of California.

H. Any action arising out of this Contract shall be brought and maintained in Yolo County California, regardless of where else venue may lie.

I. In any action brought by either party to enforce the terms of this Contract, each party shall be bear responsibility for its attorney’s fees and all costs regardless of whether one party is determined to be the prevailing party.
[Signatures on following page]
32 Attachment 1
HiTouch Services
CPC23-217– Fire Station 45 Improvements
Expires on 09/05/2024
Federal 081623

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
By: __________________________
Aaron Laurel, City Manager
ATTEST:

By: _________________________________
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: __________________________________
Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney

CONSULTANT
By: _________________________
Dwayne Deal
Division Vice President
33 EXHIBIT A
Consultant Proposal/Scope of Work
34 Federal 081623
35 Federal 081623
36 Federal 081623
37 Federal 081623
38 Federal 081623
39 Federal 081623
40 Federal 081623
41 Federal 081623
42 Federal 081623
43 Federal 081623
44 Federal 081623
45 Federal 081623
46 Federal 081623
47 Federal 081623
48 Federal 081623
49 Federal 081623
50 Federal 081623
51 Federal 081623
52 Federal 081623
53 Federal 081623
54 Federal 081623
55 Federal 081623
56 Federal 081623
57 Federal 081623
58 Federal 081623
59 Federal 081623
60 Federal 081623
61 Federal 081623
62 Federal 081623
63 Federal 081623
64 Federal 081623
65 Federal 081623
66 Federal 081623
67 Federal 081623
68 Federal 081623
69 Federal 081623
70 Federal 081623
71 Federal 081623
72 Federal 081623
73 Federal 081623

EXHIBIT B
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR CODE § 3700
[Labor Code § 1861]
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.

CONSULTANTS
By:

Dwayne Deal
Division Vice President
74 Federal 081623

EXHIBIT C

LABOR COMPLIANCE

1. PREVAILING WAGE
A. The Work contemplated herein constitutes a public work within the meaning of Labor Code sections 1720 and 1771. It shall be mandatory upon the Consultant and upon any Subcontractor, to pay not less than the said specified prevailing rates of wages to all workers employed by them under the Contract in accordance with Labor Code section 1774. The Director of the Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR") of the State of California has determined the general prevailing rate of wages of per diem wages in the locality in which the work is to be performed for each craft or type of worker needed to execute the Contract. The Consultant acknowledges that it has examined the prevailing rate of per diem wages as established by the DIR. Copies of the current schedules for prevailing wages are on file at City Hall, and the contents of those schedules are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. The Consultant shall post a copy of the applicable prevailing wage determinations at each job site, along with any other work place posters required by law.

B. The City will not recognize any claims for additional compensation because of the payment of prevailing wages. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by the Consultant in determining its proposal, and will not under any circumstances be considered as the basis of a claim against the City.

C. By executing this Contract Consultant warrants that it has registered with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with Labor Code section 1725.5.

2. PREVAILING WAGE RECORDS
A. The Consultant and each subcontractor shall keep an accurate payroll record which shows the name, address, social security number, correct work classification (in accordance with the wage decision), both straight and overtime worked each day and week, and hourly rate of pay, gross wages earned, deductions made and net wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker or other employee paid by the Consultant /subcontractor in connection with the Work. These payroll records shall be certified and shall be made available at Consultant's principal office. These records shall be maintained during the course of the Work. The Consultant and all subcontractors shall make the certified payroll records available for inspection by City representatives upon request and shall permit such representatives to interview employees during the work hours on the job site.

B. The City shall notify the Consultant in writing of any discrepancies or violations that are discovered during such inspections. Written notification pursuant to this Section shall include the actions that will be necessary to resolve the discrepancies and/or violations. The Consultant shall be held entirely responsible for the prompt resolution of all non-compliances with the prevailing wage laws, including those pertaining to all subcontractors and any lower-tier subcontractors. The Consultant shall forfeit as penalty to the City the amount specified by law for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker (whether employed by the Consultant or any subcontractor) paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under the Contract in violation of the provisions of the Labor Code and in particular, Section 1775.

C. To the extent applicable, Consultant and subcontractors shall maintain and furnish to the Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR"), a certified copy of each weekly payroll (but no less often than monthly), with a statement of compliance signed under penalty of perjury. Such certified payroll reports shall be transmitted electronically to the DIR.
75 Federal 081623
D. The City will not recognize any claims for additional compensation because of the payment of the prevailing wages. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by the Consultant in entering into the Contract, and will not under any circumstances, other than delays caused by the City, or the City’s agents, be considered as the basis of a claim against the City.

3. Labor Discrimination
Attention is directed to Section 1735 of the Labor Code, which reads as follows:
“No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of their race, color, national origin or ancestry, physical handicap, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such person, except as provided in Section 12940 of the Government Code, and every General Contractor for public works violating this section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of this chapter.”
4 Eight-Hour Day Limitation
(a) In accordance with the provisions of the Labor Code, and in particular, Sections 1810 to 1815 thereof, inclusive, incorporated herein by reference, eight hours labor shall constitute a day's work, and no worker in the employ of Consultant, or any Subcontractor, doing or contracting to do any part of the work contemplated by the Contract, shall be required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of those provisions; provided that subject to Labor Code Section 1815, a worker may perform work in excess of either eight (8) hours per day or forty (40) hours during any one week upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours per day or forty (40) hours during any one week at not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay. (b) The Consultant and each Subcontractor shall also keep an accurate record showing the names and actual hours worked of all workers employed by them in connection with the Contract. This record shall be open at all reasonable hours to the inspection of the City. It is hereby further agreed that, except as provided in (a) above, the Consultant shall forfeit as a penalty to the City the sum of twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the performance of the Contract by the Consultant or by any of its Subcontractors for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in and one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of Sections 1810 through 1815.

5. Compliance with State Requirements for Employment of Apprentices (a) The Consultant's attention is directed to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code. Provisions of said Section pertaining to employment of registered apprentices are hereby incorporated by reference into this Contract. As applicable, the Consultant or any Subcontractor employed by the Consultant in the performance of this Contract shall take such actions as necessary to comply with the provisions of Section 1777.5. 76 Federal 081623

EXHIBIT D

FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS
2 C.F.R. § 200.326 and 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Appendix II, Required Contract Clauses In the event of any contradictions or inconsistencies between these provisions and the provisions of the Agreement itself, the terms of this Exhibit shall control. ☒TERMINATION FOR CAUSE (in addition to standard Termination language) Criteria: All Contracts over $10k

1. In the event of any default by the Consultant as described below, the City may, after giving ten (10) days’ written notice to the Consultant, terminate the Consultant’s right to proceed with the Work or any part of the Work in the City’s sole discretion. Events of default include:
a. Failure or refusal to prosecute the Work, or any separable part thereof, with such diligence as will ensure the completion within the time specified in the Contract, or any extension thereof, or failure to complete said work within such time. b. Filing of bankruptcy by the Consultant, or the making of a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or appointment of a receiver on account of Consultant’s insolvency without discharge of the receiver within ten (10) days after its appointment. c. Failure to make prompt payments to Subcontractors or suppliers. d. Persistent disregard of laws, ordinances, or the instructions of the City, or other substantial violation of any provision of the Contract.

2. In the event the right of the Consultant to proceed with the Work, or any portion thereof, has been terminated because of the default of the Consultant and the Consultant has been given ten (10) days’ notice to cure such fault and has not done so, the City may take over the Work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or any other method the City deems expedient, and may take possession of and utilize in completing the Work such materials, appliances, equipment and plant as may be on the site of the Work and necessary therefore. In such event, the Consultant and its sureties shall be liable for all damages including costs of managerial and administrative services, engineering, legal and other consultant fees, and liquidated damages sustained or incurred by the City.

3. Upon termination, the Consultant shall not be entitled to receive any further payment until the Work is finished. If upon completion of the Work the total cost to the City, including engineering, legal and other consultant fees, costs of managerial and administrative services, construction costs, and liquidated damages shall be less than the amount which would have been paid if the Work had been completed by the Consultant in accordance with the terms of the Contract, then the difference shall be paid to the Consultant in the same manner as the final payment under the Contract. If the total cost incurred by the City on account of termination of the Contract and subsequent completion of the Work by the City by whatever method the City may deem expedient shall exceed said amount which the Consultant would otherwise have been paid, the Consultant and its sureties shall be liable to the City for the full amount of such excess expense.

4. The rights and remedies of the City provided in this section are in addition to any of the rights and remedies provided by the law or under this Contract. ☐ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 41 CFR Part 60-1.4b
Criteria: Construction or repair work. Select either Government Contracts or Federally Assisted Construction Contracts.
77 Federal 081623
Criteria: Government Contracts
During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows

1. The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following:

Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the contracting officer setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.

2. The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.

3. The contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the contractor's legal duty to furnish information.

4. The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided by the agency contracting officer, advising the labor union or workers' representative of the contractor's commitments under section 202 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.

5. The contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.

6. The contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by the rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the contracting agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.

7. In the event of the contractor's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of such rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.

8. The contractor will include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions 78 Federal 081623
will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as may be directed by the Secretary of Labor as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance: Provided, however, that in the event the contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. ☐ Criteria: Federally assisted construction contracts
Except as otherwise provided, each administering agency shall require the inclusion of the following language as a condition of any grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee involving federally assisted construction which is not exempt from the requirements of the equal opportunity clause: The applicant hereby agrees that it will incorporate or cause to be incorporated into any contract for construction work, or modification thereof, as defined in the regulations of the Secretary of Labor at 41 CFR Chapter 60, which is paid for in whole or in part with funds obtained from the Federal Government or borrowed on the credit of the Federal Government pursuant to a grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee, or undertaken pursuant to any Federal program involving such grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee, the following equal opportunity clause:

During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows:

1. The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following:

Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.

2. The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.

3. The contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the contractor's legal duty to furnish information.

4. The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the contractor's commitments under this section and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.
79 Federal 081623

5. The contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.

6. The contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.

7. In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.

8. The contractor will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance:

Provided, however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

The applicant further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment practices when it participates in federally assisted construction work: Provided, That if the applicant so participating is a State or local government, the above equal opportunity clause is not applicable to any agency, instrumentality or subdivision of such government which does not participate in work on or under the contract.

The applicant agrees that it will assist and cooperate actively with the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with the equal opportunity clause and the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor, that it will furnish the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor such information as they may require for the supervision of such compliance, and that it will otherwise assist the administering agency in the discharge of the agency's primary responsibility for securing compliance.

The applicant further agrees that it will refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, with a contractor debarred from, or who has not demonstrated eligibility for, Government contracts and federally assisted construction contracts pursuant to the Executive Order and will carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors and subcontractors by the administering agency or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part II, Subpart D of the Executive Order. In addition, the applicant agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply with these undertakings, the administering agency may take any or all of the following actions: Cancel, terminate, or suspend in whole or in part this grant (contract, loan, insurance, guarantee); refrain from extending any further assistance to the applicant under the program with respect to which the failure or refund occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been received from such applicant; and refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings.
80 Federal 081623
Subcontracts. Each nonexempt prime contractor or subcontractor shall include the equal opportunity clause in each of its nonexempt subcontracts.

Inclusion of the equal opportunity clause by reference. The equal opportunity clause may be included by reference in all Government contracts and subcontracts, including Government bills of lading, transportation requests, contracts for deposit of Government funds, and contracts for issuing and paying U.S. savings bonds and notes, and such other contracts and subcontracts as the Director of OFCCP may designate.

Incorporation by operation of the order. By operation of the order, the equal opportunity clause shall be considered to be a part of every contract and subcontract required by the order and the regulations in this part to include such a clause whether or not it is physically incorporated in such contracts and whether or not the contract between the agency and the contractor is written.

Adaptation of language. Such necessary changes in language may be made in the equal opportunity clause as shall be appropriate to identify properly the parties and their undertakings. ☐ DAVIS-BACON ACT (40 U.S.C. §§ 3141-3144 and 3146-3148) Criteria: Construction or repair work (not applicable to FEMA)

1. All transactions regarding this contract shall be done in compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141- 3144, and 3146-3148) and the requirements of 29 C.F.R. pt. 5 as may be applicable. The contractor shall comply with 40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148 and the requirements of 29 C.F.R. pt. 5 as applicable.

2. Contractors are required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor.

3. Additionally, contractors are required to pay wages not less than once a week. ☐ COPELAND ANTI-KICKBACK ACT
Criteria: Construction or Repair Work >$2k (not applicable to FEMA)

1. Contractor. The contractor shall comply with 18 U.S.C. § 874, 40 U.S.C. § 3145, and the requirements of 29 C.F.R. pt. 3 as may be applicable, which are incorporated by reference into this contract.

2. Subcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clause above and such other clauses as FEMA may by appropriate instructions require, and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for the compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with all of these contract clauses.

3. Breach. A breach of the contract clauses above may be grounds for termination of the contract, and for debarment
☐ CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT
Criteria: Construction or Repair contracts >$100k involving employment of Mechanics or Laborers (does not apply to purchase or service contracts)
81 Federal 081623

1. Overtime requirements. No contractor or subcontractor contracting for any part of the contract work which may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall require or permit any such laborer or mechanic in any workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to work in excess of forty hours in such workweek unless such laborer or mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek.

2. Violation; liability for unpaid wages; liquidated damages. In the event of any violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (a) of this section the contractor and any subcontractor responsible therefor shall be liable for the unpaid wages. In addition, such contractor and subcontractor shall be liable to the United States (in the case of work done under contract for the District of Columbia or a territory, to such District or to such territory), for liquidated damages. Such liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and guards, employed in violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, in the sum of $10 for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.

3. Withholding for unpaid wages and liquidated damages. The City of West Sacramento shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld, from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the contractor or subcontractor under any such contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime contractor, or any other federally-assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, which is held by the same prime contractor, such sums as may be determined to be necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such contractor or subcontractor for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as provided in the clause set forth in paragraph (b) of this section.

4. Subcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in paragraph (a) through (d) of this section and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with the clauses set forth in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section.
☐ Rights to Inventions Made Under a Contract or Agreement.

Criteria: Funding agreement (not applicable to FEMA)
(F) Rights to Inventions Made Under a Contract or Agreement. If the Federal award meets the definition of “funding agreement” under 37 CFR §401.2 (a) and the recipient or subrecipient wishes to enter into a contract with a small business firm or nonprofit organization regarding the substitution of parties, assignment or performance of experimental, developmental, or research work under that “funding agreement,” the recipient or subrecipient must comply with the requirements of 37 CFR Part 401, “Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,” and any implementing regulations issued by the awarding agency. ☐ CLEAN AIR ACT
Criteria: All contracts over $150k
(G) Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251- 1387), as amended—Contracts and subgrants of amounts in excess of $150,000 must contain a provision that requires the non-Federal award to agree to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387). Violations must be reported to the Federal awarding agency and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
82 Federal 081623
The contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.

1. The contractor agrees to report each violation to the City of West Sacramento and understands and agrees that the City of West Sacramento will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the State of California, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office.

2. The contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $100,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FEMA. ☐ FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT
Criteria: All contracts over $150k

1. The contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.

2. The contractor agrees to report each violation to the City of West Sacramento and understands and agrees that the City of West Sacramento will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the State of California, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office.

3. The contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $100,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FEMA. ☒ DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
Criteria: Over $25k
(H) Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689)—A contract award (see 2 CFR 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” SAM Exclusions contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549.

5. This contract is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 C.F.R. pt. 180 and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000. As such the contractor is required to verify that none of the contractor, its principals (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.995), or its affiliates (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.905) are excluded (defined at 2 C.F.R. §180.940) or disqualified (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.935).

6. The contractor must comply with 2 C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction it enters into.

7. This certification is a material representation of fact relied upon by the City of West Sacramento.

If it is later determined that the contractor did not comply with 2 C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C, in addition to remedies available to the City of West Sacramento, the Federal Government may pursue available remedies, including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment. The City will insure the Contractor and any lower participants are not debarred by checking the government’s System Award Management (SAM).

8. The bidder or proposer agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C while this offer is valid and throughout the period of any contract that may arise from this offer. The bidder or proposer further agrees to include a provision requiring such compliance in its lower tier covered transactions. 83 Federal 081623
☒ BYRD ANTI-LOBBYING AMENDMENT 31 U.S.C. § 1352 (AS AMENDED) Criteria: All contracts require. Any contracts over $100k also require additional certification. (I) Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352)—Contractors that apply or bid for an award exceeding $100,000 must file the required certification. Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Each tier must also disclose any lobbying with non-Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the nonFederal award.

Contractors who apply or bid for an award of $100,000 or more shall file the required certification (see Appendix A, 44 C.F.R Part 18 – Certification Regarding Lobbying). Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant, or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Each tier shall also disclose any lobbying with non-Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the recipient.
☒ RECORD RETENTION
Criteria: All contracts
In addition to the reports specified in this Agreement, Consultant shall retain the records required by the applicable provisions of 2 CFR § 200.333, no less than three (3) years after City's final payment to Consultant under this Agreement and provide the City with the reports required pursuant to 2 CFR §§ 200.328 and 200.343, and such other records and reports as the City may reasonably require in the administration of this Agreement. Consultant shall keep all other necessary books and records, including property, personnel, loan documentation and financial records, in connection with the operation and services performed under this Agreement, in accordance with 2 CFR §200.333
☒ NO OBLIGATION BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Criteria: All contracts
The Federal Government is not a party to this contract and is not subject to any obligations or liabilities to the non-Federal entity, Consultant, or any other party pertaining to any matter resulting from the contract.
☐ PROCUREMENT OF RECOVERED MATERIALS
Criteria: All contracts over $10k where work involves the use of materials (J) §200.323 Procurement of recovered materials.

A non-Federal entity that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal 84 Federal 081623
year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines."

1. In the performance of this contract, the Consultant shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA- designated items unless the product cannot be acquired—

2. Competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance schedule;

3. Meeting contract performance requirements; or

4. At a reasonable price.
a. Information about this requirement, along with the list of EPA- designate items, is available at EPA’s Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines web site,
https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive- procurement-guideline-cpg-program. ☐ Prohibition on certain telecommunications and video surveillance services or equipment.

Criteria: Contracts related to telecommunications or video surveillance or equipment (K) §200.216 Prohibition on certain telecommunications and video surveillance services or equipment.
(a) Recipients and subrecipients are prohibited from obligating or expending loan or grant funds to:
(1) Procure or obtain;
(2) Extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain; or (3) Enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. As described in Public Law 115-232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment is telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (i) For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (ii) Telecommunications or video surveillance services provided by such entities or using such equipment. (iii) Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country.
(b) In implementing the prohibition under Public Law 115-232, section 889, subsection (f), paragraph (1), heads of executive agencies administering loan, grant, or subsidy programs shall prioritize available funding and technical support to assist affected businesses, institutions and organizations as is reasonably necessary for those affected entities to transition from covered communications equipment and services, to procure replacement equipment and services, and to ensure that communications service to users and customers is sustained.
(c) See Public Law 115-232, section 889 for additional information. (d) See also §200.471."
☒ Domestic preferences for procurements
Criteria: All contracts over $10k where work involves the use of materials (L) §200.322 Domestic preferences for procurements.
(a) As appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, the non-Federal entity should, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, 85 Federal 081623
and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this award. (b) For purposes of this section:
(1) “Produced in the United States” means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. (2) “Manufactured products” means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of nonferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber." 86 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: September 27, 2023 ITEM # 6
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 23-9 AMENDING TITLE 10 (VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE REESTABLISHMENT OF SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (CIP 12019)
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT PREPARED BY:

Joanna Ortiz, Assistant Engineer
Christian Asuncion, Associate Civil Engineer
Capital Projects Department
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to consider the approval of proposed amendments to Title 10 of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1) Waive the first reading and read by title and number only, Ordinance 23-9, amending Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento; and
2) Inform the public that the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 23-9 is scheduled for November 1, 2023.

BACKGROUND
The City of West Sacramento is dedicated to providing a safe environment for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Setting speed limits requires a rational procedure to maintain the confidence of the public and legal systems. Determining speed limits relies on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of drivers. According to the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 22358, posted speed limits along collector and arterial roadways must be established and justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey. These posted speed limits must also be updated every seven (7) years and can be extended to ten (10) years when a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred.

The last update to the Citywide speed limit surveys was conducted in 2013. On August 3, 2020, City staff solicited proposals for professional services with a Request for Proposal (RFP) posted to the City website. The City received proposals from the following three firms, listed in alphabetical order:
 Kimley Horn
 Mott MacDonald
 TJKM
A three (3) person panel ranked and evaluated the proposals. The panel concluded that Mott MacDonald was the most qualified consultant to complete this assignment and to do so in a timely manner. The City Council approved the contract with Mott MacDonald on November 18, 2020.

Upon approval of the Mott MacDonald contract, City staff, in coordination with the Police Department, prioritized approximately 15 segments throughout the City to update. The radar speed surveys for these prioritized segments were conducted by National Data & Surveying (NDS) from February-April 2021.

Since speed limits are codified in the City Municipal Code, even though there were no speed limit changes proposed, an ordinance was required to reestablish the speed limits with the correct date of the reestablishment in code. Ordinance 21-09 was approved by City Council on June 16, 2021. 87 Citywide Speed Limit Survey Project
September 27, 2023

Following approval of Ordinance 21-09, City staff prioritized a second set of segments to evaluate throughout the City. The radar speed surveys for these segments were conducted by National Data & Surveying (NDS) from June-July 2021.

Ordinance 22-15 was approved by City Council on March 2, 2022 for the second set of segments.

Following approval of Ordinance 22-15, Mott MacDonald completed the evaluation for a third set of segments.

Ordinance 23-5 for these segments was approved by City Council on April 19, 2023.

ANALYSIS
Following approval of Ordinance 23-5, City staff determined the remaining segments to be included with the fourth set to be evaluated by the consultant.

The segments along with the recommended changes are listed in the table below:

Road Segment Name
Current
Posted
Speed Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Speed
Limit
Change?
1 Jefferson Boulevard between Southport Parkway and City Limits (South) 55 55 No
2 Park Boulevard between Jefferson Boulevard and Stone
Boulevard 25 25 No
3 West Capitol Avenue between Enterprise Boulevard and
Northport Drive 40 40 No
4 West Capitol Avenue between Northport Drive and Harbor Boulevard 40 40 No
5 West Capitol Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and
Sycamore Street 35 35 No
6 West Capitol Avenue between Sycamore Street and
Jefferson Boulevard 35 35 No
7 West Capitol Avenue between Jefferson Boulevard and
Grand Street 35 35 No
8 West Capitol Avenue between Grand Street and 5th Street 35 35 No For several of the segments, the 85th percentile was significantly greater than the currently posted speed limit, and this required further evaluation.

According to the CA Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devises (CA MUTCD) Section 2B.13, paragraph 12a, the posted speed limit “shall be established at the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of freeflowing traffic” The CA-MUTCD also allows for further evaluation by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer in order to lower the posted speed limits. A lower speed limit could be justified by consideration of accident data, conditions not readily apparent to the driver, residential density, and pedestrian and bicycle safety.

In addition, the CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13 included a California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 22358.8, which states “Local agency may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8.” The standard further states that “Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.” Based on the CA-MUTCD 2014 Revision 7, Section 2B.13, Mott MacDonald recommended no changes to the current posted speed limit.
88 Citywide Speed Limit Survey Project
September 27, 2023

Environmental Considerations
This action is not a project that is subject to CEQA because it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21065; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15060(c), 15378(a).)
Commission Recommendations
This item does not require policy guidance from the Commission.

Strategic Plan Integration
The Project and recommended actions support the City Council’s Strategic Principle of Core Services and infrastructure: “Sustain a financially sound city in which everyone feels safe and secure, with quality services and well-maintained infrastructure.”
Alternatives
The City Council’s primary alternatives are summarized below:
1) Approve the recommended action as stated above.
2) Delay or revise the recommended action.
3) Not approve the recommended action.

Alternative 1 is staff’s recommended action. Delay of the project or not approving the recommended action would further delay updating posted speed limits as required per CVC 22358.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Capital Projects Department in coordination with and review by the Finance Department and the City Attorney’s Office.

Budget/Cost Impact
This project is included in the current Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as CIP 12019. Sufficient funding is included in the project budget for the recommended actions and no additional funding appropriations are required or being requested at this time.

ATTACHMENTS
1) Ordinance 23-9
2) 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
89 Attachment 1
ORDINANCE 23-9

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO AMENDING MUNICIAPL CODE CHAPTER 10.18 The City Council of the City of West Sacramento does ordain as follows:

Section 1. Purpose and Authority. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend Chapter

10.18 of the Municipal Code
Section 2. Authority. The City Council enacts this Ordinance in accordance with the authority granted to cities by State law.

Section 2. Amendment. Section 10.18.010 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Chapter 10.18 SPEED LIMITS

10.18.010 Findings.

A. Pursuant to Chapter 10.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code, on September 27, 2023, the city council of the city of West Sacramento reviewed and considered the engineering and traffic survey, and related information, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

B. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the city council finds that the following streets shall have the following posted speed limits:

Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Jefferson Boulevard Southport Parkway and City Limits
(South) 55
Park boulevard Jefferson boulevard and Stone
Boulevard 25
West Capitol Ave Enterprise Boulevard and Northport
Drive 40
West Capitol Ave Northport Drive and Harbor Boulevard 40 West Capitol Ave Harbor Boulevard and Sycamore Street 35 West Capitol Ave Sycamore Street and Jefferson
Boulevard 35
West Capitol Ave Jefferson Boulevard and Grand Street 35 West Capitol Ave Grand Street and 5th Street 35
90 C. Pursuant to Chapter 10.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code, on April 19, 2023, the city council of the city of West Sacramento reviewed and considered the engineering and traffic survey, and related information, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

D. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the city council finds that the following streets shall have the following posted speed limits:

Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Anna Street Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive 25
Boatman Avenue Industrial Boulevard and Terminal
Street 25
Bryte Avenue Riverbank Road and Sacramento Ave 25
C Street 5
th Street and City Limit 30
Carlin Drive Oates Drive and Ramco Street 35
Carrie Street Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive 25
Cebrian Street Del Monte Street and Stone Boulevard 30
Channel Drive Seaport Boulevard and Channel Drive 35
Commerce Drive West end and east end 25
Davis Road Seymour Avenue and Jefferson
Boulevard 30
Douglas Street Lighthouse Drive and Sacramento
Avenue 25
Duluth Street Galveston Street and Harbor Boulevard 25
Evergreen Ave Pine Street and Harbor Boulevard 30
Evergreen Ave Harbor Boulevard and Coke Street 30
Front Street Shore Street and Terminal Street 25
Galveston Street Duluth Street and Houston Street 25
Golden Gate Drive Oakland Bay Drive and Promenade
Street 30
Golden Gate Drive Promenade Street and Marshall Road 30 Gregory Avenue Bevan Road and South River Road 45
Harmon Road Jefferson Boulevard and Antioch
Avenue 30
Hart Avenue Allen Avenue and Higgins Road 25
Houston Street West Capitol Avenue and Duluth Street 25 Higgins Road Linden Road and Hart Avenue 25
91 Ordinance 23-9
September 27, 2023
Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Higgins Road Hart Ave and Jefferson Blvd 25
Jefferson Boulevard West Capitol Avenue and 15th Street 35 Jefferson Boulevard Davis Road and Southport Parkway 55 Lighthouse Drive Fountain Drive and Kegle Drive 25
Maple Street West Capitol Avenue and Michigan
Boulevard 25
Merkley Avenue Sycamore Street and Westacre Road 25
Michigan Boulevard Pecan Street and Portsmouth Avenue 25 Michigan Boulevard Portsmouth Avenue and Jefferson
Boulevard 25
North Harbor Boulevard Riverbank Road and Reed Avenue 45 Northport Drive Commerce Drive and West Capitol
Avenue 30
Oakland Bay Drive Southport Parkway and Golden Gate
Drive (east) 35
Oates Street Carlin Drive and Ramos Drive 30
Pine Street West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen
Avenue 25
Poplar Street Evergreen Avenue and Michigan
Boulevard 25
Port Street Shore Street and Terminal Street 30
Promenade Way Ramos Drive and Golden Gate Drive 30
Ramco Street Southport Pkwy and south end terminus 35
Ramco Street Oates Street and Promenade Street 30
Riverbank Road North Harbor Road and Bryte Avenue 25
Seaport Boulevard West End and Parkway Boulevard 35
Shore Street Front Street and Del Monte Street 30
Stonegate Drive Lake Washington Blvd and Village
Parkway 35
Sutter Street West Capitol Avenue and north end
terminus 25
Sycamore Street West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen
Avenue 25
92 Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Terminal Street Del Monte Street and Industrial
Boulevard 30
Todhunter Avenue Anna Street and Sacramento Avenue 25
Westacre Road Michigan Boulevard and West Capitol
Avenue 25
3 rd Street B Street and West Capitol Avenue 25
15th Street Jefferson Boulevard and South River
Road 30
E. Pursuant to Chapter 10.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code, on April 6, 2022, the city council of the city of West Sacramento reviewed and considered the engineering and traffic survey, and related information, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

F. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the city council finds that the following streets shall have the following posted speed limits:

Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Linden Rd. (North) Summerfield Dr. to Jefferson Blvd. 35 Linden Rd Stonegate Dr. to Alder Way 35
Del Monte St. Harbor Blvd to Cebrian St 35
Cummins St. Kegle Dr. to 6th St. 25
Sunset Ave. North Harbor Blvd. to Sacramento Ave. 35
Davis Rd. Jefferson Blvd. to Antioch Ave. 40
Davis Rd. Antioch Ave. to South River Rd. 40
Harbor Blvd. Reed Ave. to Rice Ave. 35
Jefferson Blvd. Sacramento Ave. to West Capitol Ave. 40 Jefferson Blvd. Stone Blvd. to Lake Washington Blvd. 45 Jefferson Blvd. Lake Washington Blvd to Linden Rd.
(South) 45
Jefferson Blvd. Linden Rd. (South) to Davis Rd. 45
Kegle Dr. Anna St. to Sacramento Ave. 25
Lake Washington Blvd. Jefferson Blvd. to Stonegate Dr. 35 Linden Rd. (South) Summerfield Dr. to Jefferson Blvd. 35 Linden Rd. Jefferson Blvd. to Stonegate Dr. 35
93 Ordinance 23-9
September 27, 2023
Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Sacramento Ave. Kegle Dr. to 6th St. 40
Southport Pkwy. Promenade St. to Marshall St. 45
Southport Pkwy. Marshall Rd. to Jefferson Blvd. 35
Enterprise Blvd. Seaport Blvd. to Channel Dr. 35
Riverside Pkwy. Reed Ave to Stillwater Rd. 35
6 th St. Cummins Way to C Street 25
Embarcadero Dr. Riverside Pkwy. (N) to Riverside Pkwy.
(S) 30
F St. 8
th St. to 2nd St. 30
Marshall Rd. Seymour Ave to Jefferson Blvd. 35
F St. Jefferson Blvd to 8th St. 35
G. Pursuant to Chapter 10.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code, on July 14, 2021, the city council of the city of West Sacramento reviewed and considered the engineering and traffic survey, and related information, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

H. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the city council finds that the following streets shall have the following posted speed limits:

Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Enterprise Boulevard West Capitol Avenue to Seaport Blvd. 40 Gregory Avenue Jefferson Boulevard to Bevan Road 45
Harbor Boulevard Rice Avenue to West Capitol Avenue 35
Harbor Boulevard West Capitol Avenue to Industrial
Boulevard 35
Industrial Boulevard Enterprise Boulevard to Parkway
Boulevard 45
Industrial Boulevard Parkway Boulevard to Harbor Boulevard 45 Industrial Boulevard Harbor Boulevard to Stone Boulevard 45 Jefferson Boulevard 15th Street to Stone Boulevard 45
Lake Washington
Boulevard Stone Boulevard to Jefferson Boulevard 45
Reed Avenue Riverside Parkway to Sunset Avenue 40
Sacramento Avenue Sunset Avenue to Kegle Drive 40
94 Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Southport Parkway Ramco Street to Lake Washington
Boulevard 45
Stillwater Road Reed Avenue to Riverside Parkway 40
Stone Boulevard Park Boulevard and Jefferson Parkway 25 5th Street A Street to West Capitol Avenue 35
Section 3. Severability. If any provision of this chapter, or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, the remainder of this chapter, to the extent it can be given effect, or the application of those provisions to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are severable.

Section 4. Effective Date and Publication. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its adoption, and pursuant to Resolution 99-46 was published in summary format prior to adoption, and a summary will be published within 15 days after adoption in a paper of general circulation published and circulated within the City of West Sacramento. 95 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento this 27th day of September 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST: Approved as to form:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney CODIFY X UNCODIFY __________
96 Engineering & Traffic Surveys
City of West Sacramento
August 2023
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 97 507323716 REP A
C:\Users\NAR77489\Desktop\507367762-001 -
SR33_HenryMiller_TOAR_ICE_11302019.docx
Mott MacDonald
Mott MacDonald
180 Promenade Circle
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95834
Engineering & Traffic Surveys
City of West Sacramento
Final Report
August 2023

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 98 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys
Final Report
504100132-Cityofwestsac_Speedsurveysreport_08302023.Docx Issue and revision record
Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description
1 08/11/2023 RN JN TA Draft Report
2 08/30/2023 RN JN TA Final Report
Information class: Standard
This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the abovecaptioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose.

We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties.

This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.

This R eport has been prepar ed sol ely for use by the party w hich commissi oned it (the 'Client') in connection wi th the capti oned pr oject. It shoul d not be used for any other purpose. N o person other than the Client or any party w ho has expr essly agreed terms of reli ance with us (the 'Recipi ent(s)') may r ely on the content, information or any views expr essed in the R eport. This R eport is confi denti al and contains pr opri etary intell ectual pr operty and we accept no duty of car e, r esponsibility or li ability to any other recipi ent of this R eport. N o repr esentati on, w arranty or undertaki ng, express or im plied, is made and no responsi bility or liability is accepted by us to any party other than the Client or any Reci pient(s), as to the accuracy or com pleteness of the i nformati on contai ned i n this R eport. For the avoi dance of doubt thi s Report does not i n any w ay pur port to i nclude any legal, insurance or fi nanci al advice or opi nion.

We disclaim all and any liability w hether arising i n tort, contr act or otherwise w hich we might otherwise have to any party other than the Cli ent or the Reci pient(s), in respect of this Report, or any inform ation contained in it. W e accept no responsi bility for any error or omissi o n in the Report w hich is due to an error or omissi on in data, i nformation or statements supplied to us by other parti es i ncludi ng the Cli ent (the 'Data'). We have not independently verified the D ata or otherwise exami ned i t to determi ne the accuracy, com pleteness, sufficiency for any purpose or feasi bility for any particular outcome incl uding fi nanci al.

Forecasts presented i n this docum ent w ere pr epared usi ng the Data and the Repor t is dependent or based on the D ata. Inevitably, som e of the assumptions used to develop the for ecasts will not be realised and unantici pated events and circumstances m ay occur. C onsequently, we do not guarantee or w arrant the conclusions contained in the R eport as ther e are likely to be differences betw een the forecasts and the actual results and those differ ences may be m aterial. While we consi der that the information and opini ons given in this R eport are sound all parti es m ust rely on their ow n skill and judgem ent when m aking use of it.

Information and opi nions ar e current only as of the date of the Report and w e accept no responsi bility for updati ng such information or opi nion. It shoul d, therefor e, not be assum ed that any such inform ati on or opi nion conti nues to be accurate subsequent to the date of the Report. U nder no circum stances m ay this Report or any extract or summ ary thereof be used i n connecti on with any public or private securities offeri ng incl udi ng any related m emor andum or pr ospectus for any securiti es offering or stock exchange listi ng or announcem ent.

By acceptance of this Repor t you agree to be bound by this disclaim er. This disclaim er and any issues, disputes or cl aims arising out of or in connection wi th it (whether contractual or non-contractual i n natur e such as cl aims i n tort, from br each of statute or regul ati on or otherwise) shall be governed by, and constr ued i n accordance with, the law s of Engl and and W ales to the exclusion of all conflict of l aws principles and r ules. All disputes or claims arising out of or r elati ng to this discl aimer shall be subject to the excl usive jurisdicti on of the English and Welsh courts to w hich the parties irrevocably submit.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 99 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys
Final Report
504100132-Cityofwestsac_Speedsurveysreport_08302023.Docx Contents
Executive Summary 1
Certification 2
1 Introduction 3
2 Study Purpose and Methodology 5

2.1 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements 5

2.2 Speed Data Collection 7

2.3 Traffic Count Data Collection 8

2.4 Collision Data Analysis 9

2.5 Field Reviews and ‘Floating Car’ Surveys 10
3 Data Summary & Recommendations 11

3.1 Data Summary 11

3.2 Speed Limit Recommendations 12
Appendix 14
Not the
Tables
Table 1: Statewide Average Accident Rates for Roadway Types 10 Table 2: Roadway Classification, Traffic Count and Collision Data Summary 11 Table 3: E&TS Summary 12
Table 4: Summary of Speed Limit Recommendations 13
Figures
Figure 1: Citywide Speed Survey Locations Map 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 100
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 1
Final Report
Executive Summary
This Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) report prepared in conformance with requirements contained in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD, Revision 7, effective March 10, 2023) for speed zone studies, summarizes the data, evaluation, findings and recommendations for posted speed limits on study roadway segments in the City of West Sacramento. The study segments as identified by City staff are listed as follows:

Based on the data and evaluation contained in this report, for all of the study segments listed above, the current posted speed limits are recommended to be retained. Detailed discussions are contained in subsequent sections of this report.

City's
Index
#
Road Segment Name
48 Jefferson Boulevard between Southport Parkway and City Limits (South). 73 Park Boulevard between Jefferson Boulevard and Stone Boulevard. 108 West Capitol Avenue between Enterprise Boulevard and Northport Drive. 109 West Capitol Avenue between Northport Drive and Harbor Boulevard. 110 West Capitol Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Sycamore Avenue. 111 West Capitol Avenue between Sycamore Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard. 112 West Capitol Avenue between Jefferson Boulevard and Grand Street. 113 West Capitol Avenue between Grand Street and 5th Street.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 101
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 2
Final Report
Certification
This report includes the engineering and traffic surveys of speed limits within the City West Sacramento. The existing posted speed limits were reviewed for compliance with California Vehicle Code, Section 40802, which requires the preparation of engineering and traffic surveys for road segments with enforcement by radar or other electronic devices. The following reference materials were also used in the preparation of this report:

1. California Vehicle Code (CVC) – As of January 1, 2023.

2. California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD, 2014, Revision 7, effective March 10, 2023) – State of California, Department of Transportation, Sacramento, California.

All data utilized in this report is on file in the Capital Projects and Transportation Department, City of West Sacramento, 1110 West Capitol Avenue, West Sacramento, CA 95691.

The firms of Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. and Advanced Mobility Group, Inc. on behalf of the City of West Sacramento, have prepared this document.

I, Ravi Narayanan, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of West Sacramento, and this report was prepared under my supervision. This report’s contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
08/30/2023
____________________________
Ravi Narayanan, P.E., T.E.

Registered Civil Engineer 64326
Registered Traffic Engineer 2401

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 102
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 3
Final Report
1 Introduction
The City of West Sacramento, Capital Projects and Transportation Department is undertaking studies for the update of Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) for multiple roadway segments throughout the City. The purpose and intent of this E&TS is to review and update existing posted speed limits in accordance with traffic engineering practices based on the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), Revision 7, and the California Vehicle Code (CVC Section 40802).

Figure 1 illustrates the location of the study segments on a Citywide map, and also indicates the existing roadway classification and current posted speed limits on these segments.

This report contains the following:
• Overview of statutory/regulatory requirements and relevant policies/guidelines that govern the need and requirements for the preparation of E&TS. • A brief overview of data methodologies used for collection, compilation and review/analysis of study data elements including, but not limited to, speed survey data, traffic count data and collision data.
• An E&TS summary sheet for study roadway segments that includes data summary as well as posted speed limit recommendation for the subject segment. • Technical Appendices that contain extracts of key regulatory document sections referenced in this study, as well as the raw or processed data used in the study.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 103
#48
#73
#108
#109 #110
#111
#112
#113
Legend:

Collector
Local Street
Low Access Control
Low-medium Access Control
Medium-high Access Control
City Segment Index Number
Existing Speed Limit
(As of March 2022)
Speed Surveys Study
City of West Sacramento
Map Source: City of West
Sacramento Public Access GIS Map
Citywide Speed Survey Locations Map
Figure 1
C:\Users\CHO90539\Desktop\Projects\City of West Sacramento\Speed Survey Locations.dwg #XX
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 104
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 5
Final Report
2 Study Purpose and Methodology

2.1 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
Traffic speed zone surveys should fulfill California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 22357 and 22358, which require local agencies to follow certain procedures established by Caltrans in establishing new speed limits and revising existing speed limits. Furthermore, CVC Section 40802 requires speed limits enforced by radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects to be evaluated on a recurring basis by an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) conforming to CVC Section 627. If the E&TS are more than five (5) years old, the speed zone is considered to be a “speed trap” under CVC Section 40802 and courts may reject evidence of speeding obtained through radar or other electronic devices.

E&TS may be up to seven (7) years old if conditions under CVC Section 40802(c)(1) related to enforcement training and equipment certification have been met.

On January 1, 2012, CVC 21400(b) became effective requiring the Department of Transportation (i.e. Caltrans) to revise the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD) so that speed limits are based on field-collected speed data. Note that pursuant to recently passed California State Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43, Friedman, Traffic Safety) and Assembly Bill 1939 (AB 1939, Friedman, Traffic Safety, Speed limits), the CAMUTCD 2014, Section 2B.13 has been comprehensively revised per Revision 7 (effective March 10, 2023). The speed limit setting procedure is built around a ‘spot speed’ survey that typically consists of measuring speeds with a calibrated radar gun or other electronic device of motor vehicles traveling at free-flow speeds in each direction on a two-way street. The most important data point collected is the “85th percentile speed”, also referred to as the “critical speed”, which is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the sampled motor vehicles travelled during the data collection period.

According to CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, paragraph 12a, the posted speed limit “shall be established at the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.” For example, a segment with an 85th percentile speed of 32 mph would have a rounded-down posted speed limit of 30 mph, while another segment with an 85th percentile speed of 33 mph would have a rounded-up posted speed limit of 35 mph. The CA-MUTCD allows the posted speed limit to be lowered by no more than 5 mph from a rounded speed, using one of two options that depend on whether the 85th percentile speed has been rounded down or up. The options may be applied as follows:
• Option 1: Option 1 within CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, paragraph 12a says “The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.” The cited CVC Section 627 defines an E&TS that is required to consider prevailing speeds, accident records, and conditions not readily apparent to the driver, and optionally consider residential density as well as pedestrian and bicycle safety. Note that the basis for a speed limit that is more than 5 mph lower than the 85th percentile speed is something other than prevailing speeds. In regards to conditions not readily apparent to the driver, CVC 22358 states that “physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 105
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 6
Final Report
other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning.”
• Option 2: Option 2 within CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13 paragraph 12a says “For cases in which the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5-mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.” The Option 2 round-down, which became available when CVC Section 21400(b) went into effect January 1, 2012, requires no E&TS to post the speed limit sign. The E&TS is required nevertheless, however, to allow radar or similar devices to be used for enforcement.

Note again that consideration of accident data is a requirement for an E&TS as defined in CVC Section 627. However, CVC Section 21400(b) notes that in cases where Option 2 round-down is used, no further reduction in speed limit is allowed “for any reason”. Therefore, the prevailing collision data/rates based justification for speed limit decrease by 5 mph below the nearest 85th percentile speeds is only used with Option 1, and not with Option 2.

Although Option 1 could also be applied where recorded speeds are rounded up, Option 2 achieves the same reduced speed limit with lesser documentation requirements. According to the CA-MUTCD, Option 1’s documentation requirements consist of an E&TS that “shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.” The reduction must be based on considerations other than prevailing speeds, such as accident data, conditions not readily apparent to the driver, residential density, and pedestrian and bicycle safety. • According to CVC Section 22358.5, “conditions not readily apparent to the driver” exclude roadway width, curvature, grade, and surface conditions. Neither the CVC nor the CAMUTCD provide much specific guidance regarding accident data or pedestrian or bicycle safety. The CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, paragraph 34 notes however that “generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surfaces in collision histories.” Prevailing collision rates that are higher than statewide average rates for similar facilities are typically used as reasons to justify a recommended 5 mph speed limit reduction below 85th percentile speed, when Option 1 is used. • CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, paragraph 38 says “speed zones of less than 0.5 miles and short transition zones should be avoided.”
• For this study, an 85th percentile speed that coincided with a 5-mph increment was regarded as eligible for an Option 1 reduction, but not for an Option 2 round-down. • While the CA-MUTCD allows two options for lowering the posted speed limit, note that it offers no provision for raising the posted speed limit above the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed.

Note further that CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13 has included CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit), and offers the following option “Local agency may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8.” The standard further states that “Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 106
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 7
Final Report
or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.”
Residential Streets: CVC Section 22352(b)(1) defines prima facie speed limit as follows:

Twenty-five miles per hour (25 mph) on any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. CVC Section 627(c)(1) provides specific guidance on residential density. It may also be noted that many residential neighborhoods in the City of West Sacramento meet the density threshold of 16 separate dwelling houses or business structures per quarter mile of roadway frontage (both sides collectively). The statute does not apply to roadways within a business district. When residential density is considered per CVC Section 627(c)(1), judgment is applied as to whether a street lined with apartment buildings and condominiums should be considered a business district or a residential district. CVC Section 40802(b)(1) defines a “local street or road” as a facility that “primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions: (A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet, (B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length.

Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445, and (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.”
Appendix Exhibit A and Appendix Exhibit B contain the relevant CVC and CA-MUTCD 2014, Section 2B.13, Revision 7 sections respectively, that are referenced in this E&TS.

Appendix Exhibit C contains a separate E&TS for each study segment.

2.2 Speed Data Collection
The radar speed surveys were conducted by National Data & Surveying (NDS) in accordance with California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) Regulations and CA-MUTCD guidance.

The speed surveys for the study segments in this report were conducted in April 2022 and in April 2023. The CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13, paragraph 27 provides guidance in the performance of speed data collection surveys i.e. field speed measurements, including the following:
• “The intent of the speed survey is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.” • “Speed measurements should be taken during off peak hours on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.”
The following general criteria and procedures were used in the speed data collection process:
• A representative number of ‘spot speeds’ were obtained by radar and recorded at each roadway location. The data was collected during ‘free flow’ (i.e. uncongested) periods, and a minimum of 100 samples in each direction of travel were taken for each highvolume location. For low-volume locations, the survey was conducted for a minimum of one hour or until at least 50 samples in each direction were obtained. Speed survey data DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 107
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 8
Final Report
was conducted on a typical weekday (Tuesday through Thursday). Known peak travel periods were generally avoided and note that data collection was conducted between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM or between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM only if free-flow or uncongested travel conditions occurred.
• All surveys were conducted in clear, dry weather and in normal traffic flow conditions (i.e. no accidents, detours, construction, etc.). The radar measurements were taken from a parked unmarked vehicle. A specific radar survey ‘spot’ on each roadway segment was chosen based on considerations such as – minimal influence by adjacent intersections or intersection controls, major driveways, crosswalks or railroad crossings, minimal visibility restrictions and no unusual physical constraints (such as parked vehicles, dips, curves, etc.) affecting traffic flow or speed.
• A sample of passing vehicles was randomly selected with careful attention to ensure that the sample represented the entire traffic stream. If several vehicles were in a platoon, only the speed of the first vehicle was recorded. All vehicles traveling at less than 40 mph speed and within 200 feet of the lead vehicle from the lead vehicle were considered to be in platoon. If vehicles were traveling at speeds greater than 40 mph, vehicles less than 350 feet from the lead vehicle were considered to be in platoon. • Radar units were certified and calibrated prior to use. NDS periodically checks their radar gun with a tuning fork to ensure that the device is calibrated and functioning properly. The calibration certificate for radar guns will be included with the final report. The NDS technicians that conducted the speed surveys are certified radar specialists. Data collection was repeated on different days for locations where the originally collected data was determined to be either erroneous or unreliable, or additional data was preferred for purposes of data confirmation/verification.

Appendix Exhibit D contains the radar ‘spot speed’ data collection summary in a graphical histogram format for each of the study segments. The reports include the following key data statistics:
• ‘Range’ refers to the range between the lowest and highest recorded speed in the sample.
• 50th percentile speed refers to the speed at or below which 50 percent of the sampled vehicles were traveling.
• 85th percentile speed refers to the speed at or below which 85 percent of the sampled vehicles were traveling.
• “10 mph pace speed range” refers to the 10 mph speed bandwidth within which the maximum proportion of sampled vehicles were traveling.

2.3 Traffic Count Data Collection
Vehicular traffic count volumes for study segments contained in this report were recorded by NDS in February 2021 and in March-April 2022. The data was collected using hoses or other machines, at approximately the same location where the spot speed surveys were conducted, and typically on the same day the speed surveys were conducted. Bi-directional vehicular traffic counts were recorded at 15-minute intervals continuously over a 24-hour typical weekday period, and summarized. The recorded 24-hour traffic count total was then DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 108
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 9
Final Report
regarded as being representative of average daily traffic (ADT) demand conditions for the study segment for purposes of this study. Appendix Exhibit E contains the raw count data summary, and a graphical summary of the directional hourly volumes by time-of-day for each of the study segments.

The ADT data was mainly used for two purposes in this study:
• As inputs in the computation of actual current collision rates for those study segments where ‘detailed format’ E&TS report is requested.
• For purposes of comparison with relatively older/historical traffic counts (from 2013 through 2019) for the study segments as provided by the City.

The comparison of 2021 ADT data to older ADT data (if available) was completed primarily to obtain a high-level overview of daily traffic demand decreases that may have occurred in recent years and subsequent to the time the City may have last conducted speed surveys.

Note that traffic count data obtained in February-July 2021 may be regarded as “post Covid19” 1 traffic count volumes. A comparative review of ADT counts between 2013 and 2022 indicated that traffic volumes have increased in many of the City’s arterial roadways evaluated in this study, however traffic volumes on residential collectors and downtown streets have either remained relatively unchanged or somewhat decreased. Note however that no special adjustments were made to the 2021/22 counts (or speed or collision data) used in this study to account for Covid-19 impacts, however additional caution was exercised in recommending speed limit changes, especially in situations where prevailing 85 th
percentile speeds were significantly higher than posted speed limits.

2.4 Collision Data Analysis
For segments for which ‘detailed’ format E&TS reports was requested by the City, collision data analysis was completed. For segments using ‘short’ format E&TS reports, note that the collision data was not requested or reviewed in this study.

Collision data from available most recent 3 years were obtained from two sources:
• City Police Department (PD) data as provided by City Public Works staff, • Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) collision data as extracted by Mott MacDonald consultant team.

The total number of collisions and the computed actual collision rates based on SWITRS data is included in the E&TS summary sheets. The SWITRS data based graphical summaries for all study segments are included in Appendix Exhibit F. The City PD datasheets are also included for reference. An “actual” i.e. prevailing collision rate was calculated for each study segment using the following formula:

Collision Rate = (N *1,000,000) / (ADT*L*D*Y)
1 In September 2020, Mott MacDonald had high-level conversations with CA-MUTCD staff at Caltrans Headquarters, as well as Caltrans District 3 staff responsible for speed zones. The feedback received was that there are no specific Caltrans-issued policy or technical guidance on how speed surveys must be conducted or interpreted in the prevailing or post Covid-19 context, however additional technical caution (i.e. looking for significant changes in traffic volume demands, accident rates, etc. that may be reasonably attributable to Covid-19 conditions), and sound engineering judgment is recommended, especially in situations where the 85th percentile speeds are significantly greater than the posted speed limits.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 109
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 10
Final Report
• N = Total Number of collisions (midblock and intersection) within the study segment • Y = Total Number of years that the collision data was reported • ADT = Average Daily Traffic volume (vehicles per day) • L = Length of segment in miles
• D = Number of days in one year (365)
The actual rate (expressed in number of accidents per million vehicle miles per year) was compared to the “average” collision rate that may be reasonably expected to occur on roadways and highways with same/similar characteristics based on statewide data. The statewide average collision rates obtained from Caltrans are summarized in Table 1 for roadway types/cross-sections considered most similar to study facilities in the City of West Sacramento.

Table 1: Statewide Average Accident Rates for Roadway Types

2.5 Field Reviews and ‘Floating Car’ Surveys
In order to evaluate ‘conditions not readily apparent to the driver’, a review of all surveyed roadway segments was conducted to document highway, traffic, and roadside conditions from both field visits and aerial/mapping reviews. These reviews included review of the following:
• Roadside conditions (both physical and functional)
• Type and density of adjacent land uses, including residential uses. • Multimodal safety and potential conflicts with pedestrians, bicyclists, and residential or business districts, and heavy vehicle traffic in industrial areas.

Furthermore, a California-registered Traffic Engineer conducted a field check of study roadway segments, which involved driving each roadway segment during the ‘off-peak’ weekday travel periods, while "floating" with surrounding traffic in order to determine the speed of traffic from the driver's viewpoint.

Roadway Type Average Total Collision Rate
(per Million Vehicle Miles)
Two/three-lane Arterial/Collector (Rural) 0.79
Two/three-lane Arterial/Collector (Urban) 1.44
Four (or more) lanes Undivided Arterial (Statewide) 0.91 Four (or more) lanes Divided Arterial (Statewide) 0.99
Source: 2020 Crash Data on California State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates) DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 110
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 11
Final Report
3 Data Summary & Recommendations

3.1 Data Summary
A written statement for each study roadway segment was prepared and included in Appendix Exhibit C. Each of these segment-specific statements are considered the E&TS report for the subject segment. Each segment’s E&TS report contains a summary listing of the following:
• A high-level schematic map indicating study segment location and limits • Field speed survey data, and speed data statistics
• Average daily traffic count data
• For segments for which ‘detailed’ format E&TS reports was requested by the City, collision data and computed actual collision rates, and comparison to statewide average accident rates for similar facilities were included. For segment using ‘short’ format E&TS reports, note that the collision data was not requested or reviewed. • A brief description of physical/roadside characteristics including adjacent land uses, number of lanes, roadway functional classification, traveled way widths, median types/characteristics, number/frequency of driveways and intersections, bike and pedestrian facilities, railroad crossings, and truck traffic. • Existing and recommended speed limits, and
• An explanation for the recommended speed limit.
• Certification
Table 2 shows a summary of roadway classifications, traffic count data and collision data for study segments. Collision data is only included for detailed E&TS report segments.

Table 2: Roadway Classification, Traffic Count and Collision Data Summary City's
Index
#
Road Segment Name Current General Plan
Roadway Classification Median Type Number of Lanes
Average
Daily
Traffic
(2022)
Length
(mi)
Number of
Collisions
(SWITRS)
01/2018 -
12/2020
Acutal
Accident
Rate
(Acc/MVM)
(SWITRS
Data)
Statewide
Average
Accident
Data
(Acc/MVM)
48 Jefferson Boulevard between Southport
Parkway and City Limits (South).

Medium-High Access
Control Arterial
None, centerline
only 2 1,785 1.2
73 Park Boulevard between Jefferson
Boulevard and Stone Boulevard. Collector Raised Divided Island 2 2,298 1.1 29 10.48 1.44 108 West Capitol Avenue between Enterprise
Boulevard and Northport Drive.

Low Access control
Arterial
Two-way left-turn
median lane 3 6,879 0.8
109 West Capitol Avenue between Northport
Drive and Harbor Boulevard.

Low Access control
Arterial
Two-way left-turn
median lane 3 8,817 0.8
110 West Capitol Avenue between Harbor
Boulevard and Sycamore Street.

Medium-High Access
Control Arterial
Raised Divided
Island 4 13,008 0.6
111 West Capitol Avenue between Sycamore
Street and Jefferson Boulevard.

Medium-High Access
Control Arterial
Raised Divided
Island 4 10,558 0.6
112 West Capitol Avenue between Jefferson
Boulevard and Grand Street.

Medium-High Access
Control Arterial
Raised Divided
Island 4 5,223 0.4
113 West Capitol Avenue between Grand
Street and 5th Street.

Medium-High Access
Control Arterial
Raised Divided
Island 2 10,793 0.3
114 Westacre Road between Michigan Local None, centerline 2 1,717 0.2 23 61.17 1.46 Notes: SWITRS = Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 111
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 12
Final Report

3.2 Speed Limit Recommendations
For each study segment, a recommendation for posted speed limit was developed based on one of the following five scenarios that occurred:

1. Nearest 5-mph increment of 85
th percentile speed matched existing posted limit and
therefore no speed limit change is recommended.

2. A 5 mph reduction from the nearest 5-mph increment 85th percentile speed (justified based on ‘Option 1’ or ‘Option 2’) matched existing posted limit, and therefore no speed limit change is recommended.

3. A 5 mph reduction from the nearest 5-mph increment 85th percentile speed (justified based on ‘Option 1’ or ‘Option 2’) is greater than existing posted limit, and therefore a speed limit change is recommended.

4. A 5 mph reduction from the nearest 5-mph increment 85th percentile speed (justified based on ‘Option 1’ or ‘Option 2’) is greater than existing posted limit, and still considered more than reasonable or safe, and therefore pursuant to CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) as referenced in CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13, the currently posted speed limit (which was established based on a 2013 E&TS previously certified by the City) is recommended to be retained.

5. For residential fronting local streets the existing prima facie speed limit of 25 mph is recommended to be retained per CVC Section 22352(b)(1), if the street meets residential density criteria per CVC Section 627(c)(1) and local street criteria per Section 40802(b)(1).

Table 3 shows a summary of the E&TS data, findings and recommendations for all study segments.

Table 3: E&TS Summary
City's
Index
#
Road Segment Name Survey
Date
Survey
Time
Number
of
Lanes
Length
(mi)
Posted
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Number
of Radar
Sample
Data
10 MPH
Pace
% in
Pace
50%
tile
Speed
(mph)
85%
tile
Speed
(mph)
85% tile
Speed
(mph) -

ROUNDED
Applied
Option
Recomm.

Speed
Limit
(mph)
Speed
Limit
Change
?
48 Jefferson Boulevard b/w
Southport Parkway and
City Limits (South).
4/27/2023 13:00-14:20 2 1.2 55 100 47-56 55% 53 63 65
CVC
22358.8
55 NO
73 Park Boulevard b/w
Jefferson Boulevard and
Stone Boulevard.
4/27/2023 9:00-10:00 2 1.1 25 122 26-35 75% 31 37 35
CVC
22358.8
25 NO
108
West Capitol Avenue b/w
Enterprise Boulevard and
Northport Drive.
4/27/2023 10:25-11:15 3 0.8 40 201 37-46 69% 43 48 50
CVC
22358.8
40 NO
109
West Capitol Avenue b/w
Northport Drive and
Harbor Blvd.
4/27/2023 11:30-12:20 3 0.8 40 206 36-45 80% 41 45 45 1 40 NO 110
West Capitol Avenue b/w
Harbor Boulevard and
Sycamore Street
4/27/2023 14:50-15:40 4 0.6 35 200 36-45 69% 40 46 45
CVC
22358.8
35 NO
111
West Capitol Avenue b/w
Sycamore Street and
Jefferson Boulevard.
4/6/2022 10:35-11:35 4 0.6 35 126 32-41 71% 37 42 40 1 35 NO 112
West Capitol Avenue b/w
Jefferson Boulevard and
Grand Street.
4/7/2022 9:00-10:25 4 0.4 35 110 31-40 76% 35 40 40 1 35 NO 113
West Capitol Avenue b/w
Grand Street and 5th
Street.
4/5/2022 13:30-14:30 2 0.3 35 138 32-41 71% 36 42 40 1 35 NO Notes: "Applied Option" refers to CA-MUTCD, Revision 7, Section 2B.13 defined Options 1 and 2 or CVC Section 22358.8, as described in Report Section 2.1 .

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 112
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 13
Final Report
Table 4 summarizes the segment speed limit recommendations from this study.

Table 4: Summary of Speed Limit Recommendations
City's
Index
#
Road Segment Name
Current
Posted
Speed Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Speed
Limit
Change?
48 Jefferson Boulevard between Southport Parkway and City Limits (South). 55 55 NO 73 Park Boulevard between Jefferson Boulevard and Stone Boulevard. 25 25 NO 108 West Capitol Avenue between Enterprise Boulevard and Northport Drive. 40 40 NO 109 West Capitol Avenue between Northport Drive and Harbor Boulevard. 40 40 NO 110 West Capitol Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Sycamore Street. 35 35 NO 111 West Capitol Avenue between Sycamore Street and Jefferson Boulevard. 35 35 NO 112 West Capitol Avenue between Jefferson Boulevard and Grand Street. 35 35 NO 113 West Capitol Avenue between Grand Street and 5th Street. 35 35 NO DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 113
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 14
Final Report
Appendix
Appendix Exhibit A – Applicable CVC Sections
Appendix Exhibit B – 2014 CA-MUTCD, Revision 7, Section 2B.13 Appendix Exhibit C – E&TS Summary sheets
Appendix Exhibit D – Radar Spot Speed surveys
Appendix Exhibit E – 24-Hour Traffic Volume Counts & Distribution Appendix Exhibit F – Collision Data Summary
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 114

APPENDIX EXHIBIT A

APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE (CVC) SECTIONS

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY DEFINED
627. (a) "Engineering and traffic survey," as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. (B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B). (2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

Amended Sec. 1, Ch. 45, Stats. 2000. Effective January 1, 2001.

MUTCD AND SPEED LIMITS
21400 (b) The Department of Transportation shall revise the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on January 1, 2012, to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic.

However, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment, but then the Department of Transportation or a local authority shall not reduce the speed limit any further for any reason.

Amended by Stats. 2011, Ch. 528, Sec. 2. Effective January 1, 2012.

BASIC SPEED LAW
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Amended Ch. 252, Stats. 1963. Effective September 20, 1963.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 115

PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS
22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
(1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
(2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
(3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
(1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. (2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority is not required to erect any sign pursuant to this paragraph until donations from private sources covering those costs are received and the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may, however, utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs.

Added Sec. 1, Ch. 420, Stats. 2013. Effective January 1, 2014. 22357.(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 116
(Repealed (in Sec. 28) and added by Stats. 1995, Ch. 766, Sec. 29. Effective January 1, 1996. This section became operative, by its own provisions, on the date described in Section 22366.) DECREASE NEAR CHILDREN’S PLAYSGROUNDS
22357.1. Notwithstanding Section 22357, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, set a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on any street, other than a state highway, adjacent to any children's playground in a public park but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use the facilities. The 25 miles per hour speed limit shall be effective when signs giving notice of the speed limit are posted. Added Ch. 508, Stats. 1989. Effective January 1, 1990. 22358. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, or 25 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366. (Repealed (in Sec. 30) and added by Stats. 1995, Ch. 766, Sec. 31. Effective January 1, 1996. This section became operative, by its own provisions, on the date described in Section 22366.)

DECREASE ON NARROW STREET
22358.3. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

Amended Ch. 1095, Stats. 1972. Effective March 7, 1973. Supersedes Ch. 372. 22358.4. (a) (1) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey.
(2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 117
leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the school zone.
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration.
(5) (A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (B) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from the school grounds.
(D) A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs incurred by the department under this subdivision.
(Amended by Stats. 2007, Ch. 384, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2008.)

DECREASE OF LOCAL LIMITS NEAR SCHOOLS OR SENIOR CENTERS 22358.4. (a) (1) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey.
(2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 118
ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the school zone.
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration.
(5) (A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (C) For purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from the school grounds.
(D) A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs incurred by the department under this subdivision.

Amended Sec. 1, Ch. 384, Stats. 2007. Effective January 1, 2008.

DOWNWARD SPEED ZONING
22358.5. It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 119
would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

Added Ch. 11, Stats. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959.

RETAINING OR RESTORING SPEED LIMIT
22358.8 - Retaining or restoring speed limit
(a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Amended by Stats 2022 ch 406 (AB 1938),s 3, eff. 1/1/2023.

Added by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 8, eff. 1/1/2022.

SPEED TRAPS
40802. (a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of transportation. When a street or road does not appear on the “California Road System Maps,” it may be defined as a “Local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 120
(2) For purposes of this section "school zone" means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone" also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. (c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear; the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D).
(ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406. (D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility. (2) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B) (i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 10 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.

Amended Sec. 49, Ch. 491, Stats. 2010. Effective January 1, 2011.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 121
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 122
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 123
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 124
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 125
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 126
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 127
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 128
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 129
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 130
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 131
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 132
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 133
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 134
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 135
Appendix C
Engineering & Traffic Surveys
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 136

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Jefferson Boulevard City Index Number: 48 Survey Limits: between Southport Parkway and City Limits (South).

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 4/27/2023 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 1:00 PM -2:20 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 100
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 63 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 53 MPH Pace Speed: 47 MPH To 56 MPH
In Pace: 55.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 55 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,785
Length of Segment (In Feet): 6,336
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type:

Medium-High Access Control
Arterial Center Divider: None, centerline only
Roadway Width: 28' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 55 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 55 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 8/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The high-speed segment runs through a rural residential area entering the south end of the City. No direct driveway access from fronting properties. No sidewalks are present in both directions, no on-street parking.

Comments: Pursuant to CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) as referenced in CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13 , it is recommended that the currently posted 55 mph speed limit (established based on a 2013 E&TS previously certified by City) be retained.

Roadway Geometrics: 28' wide medium-high access control arterial with a centerline only as a divider. No bike lanes or shoulders are present.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 Ryan Teves, PE Senior Civil Engineer 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT 137
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 138

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Park Boulevard City Index Number: 73
Survey Limits: Between Jefferson Blvd and Stone Blvd
Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 4/27/2023 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 09:00 AM-10:00 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 122
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 37 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 31 MPH Pace Speed: 26 MPH To 35 MPH
In Pace: 75.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 2,298
Length of Segment (In Feet): 5,808
C. Collision History
Number of Collisions (SWITRS) [Jan.18-Dec.20]: 29
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM): 10.48
Statewide Avg. Accident
Rate for Comparable Street
(Acc/MVM):

1.44 D. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Major Collector Center Divider: None, striped median left-turn lane Roadway Width: 70 ft # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 08/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Public Works.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: Corridor runs through residential neighborhood, with high frequency of fronting residential driveways, on-street parking, Five foot wide sidewalks adjacent along both directions border residential properties.

Comments: Pursuant to CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) as referenced in CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13, it is recommended that the currently posted 25 mph speed limit (established based on a 2013 E&TS previously certified by City) be retained.

Roadway Geometrics: 70' wide, two lane collector with median turning lane and intermittent landscaped center medians, many marked crosswalks, Corridor contains one signalized intersection and 15 unsignalized intersections. Both directions have six foot wide adjacent bike lanes and 20' wide shoulders bordering residential properties for on-street parking.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014, Revision 7 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Public Works Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 Ryan Teves, PE Senior Civil Engineer 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT 139
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 140

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: West Capitol Avenue City Index Number: 108 Survey Limits: between Enterprise Boulevard and Northport Drive.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 4/27/2023 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 10:25 AM-11:15 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 201
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 48 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 43 MPH Pace Speed: 37 MPH To 46 MPH
In Pace: 69.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 40 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 6,879
Length of Segment (In Feet): 4,224
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Low Access control Arterial Center Divider: Two-way median left-turn lane Roadway Width: 55' # of lanes: 3
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 40 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 40 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 08/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a commercial-industrial mixed area. Many warehouses with large properties front the roadway.

Gas station uses and commercial areas have driveways with street access.

Comments: Pursuant to CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) as referenced in CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13 , it is recommended that the currently posted 40 mph speed limit (established based on a 2013 E&TS previously certified by City) be retained.

Roadway Geometrics: 55' wide, low access control arterial, with two-way left-turn median lane. Buffered bike lanes and sidewalks present on both sides.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 Senior Civil Engineer 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT Ryan Teves, PE 141
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 142

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: West Capitol Avenue City Index Number: 109 Survey Limits: between Northport Drive and Harbor Boulevard.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 4/27/2023 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 11:30 AM-12:20 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 206
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 45 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 41 MPH Pace Speed: 36 MPH To 45 MPH
In Pace: 80.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 40 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 8,817
Length of Segment (In Feet): 4,224
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Low Access control Arterial Center Divider: Two-way median left-turn lane Roadway Width: 55' # of lanes: 3
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 40 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 40 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 08/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a commercial-industrial mixed use area. Many warehouses with large properties front the roadway.

Gas station uses and commercial areas have driveways with street access.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 45 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain posted speed limit of 40 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 55' wide, low access control arterial, with two-way left-turn median divider. Four unsignalized intersections through the corridor are T-intersections. Buffered bike lanes and intermittent sidewalks present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014, Revision 7 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 Ryan Teves, PE Senior Civil Engineer 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT 143

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: West Capitol Avenue City Index Number: 110 Survey Limits: between Harbor Boulevard and Sycamore Street.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 4/27/2023 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 2:50 PM-3:40 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 200
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 46 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 40 MPH Pace Speed: 36 MPH To 45 MPH
In Pace: 69.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 13,008
Length of Segment (In Feet): 3,168
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type:

Medium-High Access Control
Arterial Center Divider: Raised Divided Island
Roadway Width: 75' # of lanes: 4
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 08/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential and commercial mixed use area. A large number of residences and shopping centers front the roadway, and have direct driveway access to the street. 5' wide sidewalks are present in both directions.

Comments: Pursuant to CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) as referenced in CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13, it is recommended that the currently posted 35 mph speed limit (established based on a 2013 E&TS previously certified by City) be retained.

Roadway Geometrics: 75' wide, medium-high access control arterial, with a raised divided island. Buffered bike lanes present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014, Revision 7 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 Ryan Teves, PE Senior Civil Engineer 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT 144
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 145

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: West Capitol Avenue City Index Number: 111 Survey Limits: between Sycamore Street and Jefferson Boulevard.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 4/6/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 10:35-11:35 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 126
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 42 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 37 MPH Pace Speed: 32 MPH To 41 MPH
In Pace: 71.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 10,558
Length of Segment (In Feet): 3,168
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type:

Medium-High Access Control
Arterial Center Divider: Raised Divided Island
Roadway Width: 115' # of lanes: 4
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 8/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential and commercial area. A large number of residences and shopping centers front the roadway. All residential and commercial properties have driveways with street access. A 5' wide sidewalk is present in both directions.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 40 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain posted speed limit of 35 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 115' wide, medium-high access control arterial with raised divided median island. Jefferson Boulevard, Westcare Road, and Poplar Ave intersections are signalized. Buffered bike lanes present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 Ryan Teves, PE Senior Civil Engineer 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT 146

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: West Capitol Avenue City Index Number: 112 Survey Limits: between Jefferson Boulevard and Grand Street Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 4/7/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 9:00-10:25 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 110
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 40 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 35 MPH Pace Speed: 31 MPH To 40 MPH
In Pace: 76.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 5,223
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,112
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type:

Medium-High Access Control
Arterial Center Divider: Raised Divided Island
Roadway Width: 115' # of lanes: 4
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 8/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a office and commercial area. Adjacent businesses have driveways with direct street access.

Separated sidewalks present in both directions.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 40 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain posted speed limit of 35 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 115' wide, medium-high access control arterial with raised divided island. Bike lanes and sidewalks present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT Ryan Teves, PE Senior Civil Engineer 147

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: West Capitol Avenue City Index Number: 113 Survey Limits: between Grand Street and 5th Street.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 4/5/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 1:30-2:30 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 138
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 42 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 36 MPH Pace Speed: 32 MPH To 41 MPH
In Pace: 71.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 10,793
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type:

Medium-High Access Control
Arterial Center Divider: Raised Divided Island
Roadway Width: 50' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 8/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: Short segment runs through a residential and commercial area, however there are not too many driveways, sidewalks present in both directions.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 40 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (bike/pedestrian considerations). Recommendation is to retain posted speed limit of 35 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 50-55' wide, medium-high access control arterial with raised medianisland. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 Ryan Teves, PE Senior Civil Engineer 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT 148
Appendix D

1. Spot Speed Surveys – National Data & Surveying Services (NDS) DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 149
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 55 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 1
36 37
38 1
39 40 1
41 1
42 1
43 1
44 3
45 3
46 1
47 3
48 5
49 4
50 6
51 8
52 7
53 8
54 7
55 5
56 2
57 2
58 3
59 5
60 3
61 62 1
63 5
64 3
65 2
66 3
67 3
68 2
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 35 - 68 53 mph 63 mph 47 - 56 55 55% 13% / 13 32% / 32

SPEED PARAMETERS
SR 84/Jefferson Blvd S/O Southport Pkwy
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
13:00-14:20
4/27/2023
Project #: 23-070092-005
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 150
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 1
24 4
25 3
26 8
27 12
28 8
29 9
30 12
31 12
32 11
33 10
34 5
35 4
36 4
37 4
38 3
39 1
40 2
41 2
42 2
43 2
44 2
45 46 1
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 122 23 - 46 31 mph 37 mph 26 - 35 91 75% 6% / 8 19% / 23

SPEED PARAMETERS
Park Blvd Bet. 16th St & 17th St
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:00
4/27/2023
Project #: 23-070092-001
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 151
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 2
34 4
35 3
36 6
37 12
38 13
39 13
40 11
41 17
42 15
43 13
44 15
45 14
46 15
47 11
48 12
49 8
50 3
51 4
52 4
53 4
54 2
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 201 33 - 54 43 mph 48 mph 37 - 46 138 69% 7% / 15 24% / 48

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Capitol Ave Bet. Enterprise Blvd & Northport Dr
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:25-11:15
4/27/2023
Project #: 23-070092-002
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 152
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32 1
33 3
34 5
35 9
36 13
37 14
38 19
39 18
40 19
41 19
42 17
43 15
44 17
45 13
46 8
47 6
48 3
49 2
50 2
51 1
52 1
53 1
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 206 32 - 53 41 mph 45 mph 36 - 45 164 80% 8% / 18 12% / 24

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Capitol Ave Bet. Northport Dr & Harbor Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:30-12:20
4/27/2023
Project #: 23-070092-003
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 153
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
28 29 1
30 31 2
32 2
33 6
34 8
35 10
36 12
37 13
38 13
39 14
40 18
41 16
42 15
43 14
44 11
45 11
46 6
47 4
48 8
49 5
50 4
51 3
52 3
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 200 27 - 52 40 mph 46 mph 36 - 45 137 69% 15% / 30 17% / 33

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Capltol Ave Bet. Harbor Blvd & Sycamore Ave
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
14:50-15:40
4/27/2023
Project #: 23-070092-004
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 154
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 2
26 1
27 28 2
29 2
30 3
31 3
32 9
33 7
34 8
35 14
36 9
37 6
38 12
39 10
40 9
41 5
42 6
43 3
44 1
45 3
46 3
47 3
48 1
49 2
50 1
51 1
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 126 25 - 51 37 mph 42 mph 32 - 41 89 71% 10% / 13 20% / 24

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Capitol Ave Bet. Sycamore St & Jefferson Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:35-11:35
4/6/2022
Project #: 22-070044-066
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 155
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 1
28 6
29 2
30 3
31 5
32 12
33 9
34 6
35 13
36 11
37 6
38 7
39 8
40 7
41 2
42 5
43 2
44 2
45 1
46 1
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 110 26 - 46 35 mph 40 mph 31 - 40 84 76% 11% / 13 12% / 13

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Capitol Ave Bet. Jefferson Blvd & Grand St
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:25
4/7/2022
Project #: 22-070044-067
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 156
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 1
27 1
28 3
29 30 6
31 4
32 10
33 6
34 9
35 17
36 11
37 11
38 13
39 5
40 11
41 5
42 5
43 8
44 8
45 1
46 47 1
48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 138 25 - 48 36 mph 42 mph 32 - 41 98 71% 11% / 16 18% / 24

SPEED PARAMETERS
Tower Bridge Gateway Bet. Grand St & 3rd St
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:30-14:30
4/5/2022
Project #: 22-070044-068
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 157
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 158
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 159
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 160
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 161
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 162
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 163
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 164
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 165
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 166
Appendix Exhibit F

1. SWITRS Data Graphic: January 2018 – December 2020

2. West Sacramento Police Department Collision Data: January 2018 – December 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 167
Appendix Exhibit F

1. SWITRS Data Graphic: January 2018 – December 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 168
73: Park Boulevard between Jefferson Boulevard and Stone Boulevard Data: West Sacramento Police Department, January 2018 – December 2020. 25 reported collisions. 24%
20%
16%
12%
8%
8%
8%
4%
Cause of Collision
improper turning (6)unsafe speed (5)driving under influence (4)auto r/w violation (3) traffic signals and signs (2)unsafe starting/backing (2)wrong side of road (2) other hazardous movement (1)
32%
24%
24%
16%
4%
Collision Type
hit object (8)
broadside (6)rear-end (6)
sideswipe (4)head-on (1)
0123456
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0
2 6
1 2
1 3
1 0
3 1
Number of Collisions in 3 Years
Time of Day of Collisions over 3 Year Period
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 169
Appendix Exhibit F

2. West Sacramento Police Department Collision Data: January 2018 – December 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 170
Collision Summary Report
City of West Sacramento
Police Department
3/5/21
From 1/1/2018 to 1/1/2021Total Collisions: 25Injury Collisions: 9Fatal Collisions: 0PARK BLVD Page 1 of 418‐00843 2/8/2018 22:37 Thursday Rear‐End Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Driving Under Influence
0' Direction: Not Stated
23152A Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Not Stated
Male Age: 41
Assoc Factor: Violation
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HBD Under Influence
Party 1 Driver North 1998 MERCURY VILLAGER Mini Van No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Not Stated
Female Age: 34
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Stopped In Road
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver North 2014 FORD FOCUS Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 18‐01077 2/20/2018 15:35 Tuesday
Broadside Other Motor Vehicle
PARK BLVD ‐ FALLBROOK ST
Other Hazardous Movement
0' Direction: Not Stated
21803A Hit & Run: No Complaint of Pain # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 47
Assoc Factor: Other
Making Right Turn
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver East 2015 MITSUBISHI MIRAGE Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 27
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2003 FORD FOCUS Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain 18‐02858 5/24/2018 16:01 Thursday
Broadside Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Auto R/W Violation
0' Direction: Not Stated
21804A Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 20
Assoc Factor: Vision Obscureme
Entering Traffic
Veh Type: Pickup Truck Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2000 FORD RANGER Pickups & Panels No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 18
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2002 HONDA ACCORD Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 18‐04437 8/10/2018 Friday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ LAKEWOOD DR
Improper Turning
160' Direction: South
22107 Hit & Run: Misde Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Not Stated
Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Ran Off Road
Veh Type: Other Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Driver West Unknown Hit and Run Vehicle Involvem No Injury 18‐05032 9/7/2018 12:07 Friday
Broadside Bicycle
PARK BLVD ‐ STONE BLVD
Improper Turning
300' Direction: North
22107 Hit & Run: Misde Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
M/C Helmet Driver ‐ No Not Stated
Male Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Making Left Turn
Veh Type: Bicycle Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Bicyclist South BICYCLE Bicycle No Injury
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 21
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver North 2017 NISSAN ALTIMA Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 18‐06171 11/5/2018 15:12 Monday
Broadside Other Motor Vehicle
PARK BLVD ‐ ALAMEDA BLVD
Improper Turning
114' Direction: South
22107 Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 48
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Making U Turn
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2004 CHEVROLET TAHOE Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 171
PARK BLVD Page 2 of 4
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 20
Assoc Factor:

Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2007 TOYOTA MATRIX Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 18‐07193 12/31/2018 15:52 Monday
Rear‐End Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Unsafe Speed
0' Direction: Not Stated
22350 Hit & Run: Misde Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Not Stated
Male Age:

Assoc Factor: None Stated
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Driver South 2008 JEEP WRANGLER Sport Utility Vehicle No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Not Stated
Male Age: 29
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Stopped In Road
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2017 GMC YUKON Sport Utility Vehicle No Injury 19‐01636 3/22/2019 14:30 Friday
Broadside Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Traffic Signals and Signs
0' Direction: Not Stated
21453(a) Hit & Run: Felony Complaint of Pain # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 Daylight Raining Pty at Fault:1
Not Stated
Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Driver West Sport Utility Vehicle No Injury
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 54
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2013 LEXUS ES Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain 19‐03213 6/3/2019 15:34 Monday
Rear‐End Parked Motor Vehicle
PARK BLVD ‐ WEBSTER ST
Unsafe Starting or Backing
200' Direction: South
22106 Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Unknown
Male Age: 56
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Backing
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver West 1996 CHEVROLET 1500 Pickups & Panels No Injury Not Stated
Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Parked
Veh Type: Sobriety: Not Applicable
Party 2 Parked Vehicle South CUSTOM RADAR TRAILER Mobile Equipment No Injury 19‐04362 7/25/2019 15:31 Thursday
Sideswipe Other Motor Vehicle
PARK BLVD ‐ WESTACRE RD
Driving Under Influence
0' Direction: Not Stated
23152A Hit & Run: Misde Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 43
Assoc Factor: Violation
Making Right Turn
Veh Type: Sobriety: HBD Under Influence
Party 1 Driver East 2006 FORD MUSTANG Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 33
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Stopped In Road
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver North 2016 HONDA HR‐V Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 19‐06653 11/7/2019 20:18 Thursday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ FALLBROOK ST
Driving Under Influence
0' Direction: Not Stated
23152A Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Not Us Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 40
Assoc Factor: Violation
Ran Off Road
Veh Type: Sobriety: HBD Under Influence
Party 1 Driver West 2013 TOYOTA AVALON Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 19‐07518 12/18/2019 19:50 Wednesday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ FALLBROOK ST
Improper Turning
0' Direction: Not Stated
21651A1 Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ No Street  Raining Pty at Fault:1
Lap Belt Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 40
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2016 FORD CMAX Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 20‐00143 1/8/2020 18:32 Wednesday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ FALLBROOK ST
Wrong Side of Road
0' Direction: Not Stated
21650 Hit & Run: No Complaint of Pain # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 64
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Ran Off Road
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2005 LEXUS RX Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain 20‐00665 2/6/2020 19:42 Thursday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ FALLBROOK ST
Wrong Side of Road
0' Direction: Not Stated
21651(a)(1) Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 172
PARK BLVD Page 3 of 4
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 21
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2012 CHEVROLET MALIBU Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 20‐02173 5/8/2020 19:39 Friday
Broadside Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Auto R/W Violation
0' Direction: Not Stated
21804A Hit & Run: No Complaint of Pain # Inj: 2 # Killed: 0 Dusk ‐ Dawn Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 24
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Entering Traffic
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2017 HONDA CIVIC Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 39
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2018 TESLA MODEL S Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain 20‐02258 5/14/2020 15:18 Thursday
Sideswipe Other Motor Vehicle
PARK BLVD ‐ 15TH ST
Auto R/W Violation
0' Direction: Not Stated
21800C Hit & Run: No Complaint of Pain # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 22
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver North 2017 KIA OPTIMA Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 20
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver East 2009 CHEVROLET COBALT Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain 20‐02779 6/6/2020 22:47 Saturday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ 15TH ST
Improper Turning
0' Direction: Not Stated
22107 Hit & Run: Misde Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Not Stated Cell Phone Not In Use
Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Other Unsafe Turning
Veh Type: Sobriety: HBD Impairment Un
Party 1 Driver No Injury
20‐02911 6/25/2020 12:38 Thursday
Sideswipe Other Object
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Unsafe Starting or Backing
0' Direction: Not Stated
22106 Hit & Run: Felony Other Visible Injury # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Not Stated
Male Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Driver South HONDA Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury M/C Helmet Driver ‐ Yes
Male Age: 66
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Stopped In Road
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2019 HARLEY DAVIDS CRUISING Motorcycle Other Visible Injury 20‐03552 8/1/2020 14:51 Saturday
Rear‐End Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Unsafe Speed
0' Direction: Not Stated
22350 Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used
Female Age: 29
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2017 HONDA CIVIC Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used
Female Age: 55
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Stopped In Road
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2015 HONDA FIT Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 20‐03764 8/12/2020 23:40 Wednesday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ 16TH ST
Driving Under Influence
5' Direction: North
23152(a) Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used
Female Age: 23
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HBD Under Influence
Party 1 Driver East 2005 FORD FOCUS Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 20‐04170 9/2/2020 17:58 Wednesday
Head‐On Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Traffic Signals and Signs
0' Direction: Not Stated
21453(a) Hit & Run: No Complaint of Pain # Inj: 2 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used
Female Age: 65
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver North 2015 GMC ACADIA Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain Lap/Shoulder Harness Used
Male Age: 26
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Making Left Turn
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver West 2013 FORD FOCUS Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 173
PARK BLVD Page 4 of 4
20‐04518 9/21/2020 22:21 Monday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ FALLBROOK ST
Unsafe Speed
0' Direction: Not Stated
22350 Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 41
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2020 NISSAN VERSA Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 20‐04580 9/24/2020 17:10 Thursday
Rear‐End Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Unsafe Speed
0' Direction: Not Stated
22350 Hit & Run: Felony Complaint of Pain # Inj: 2 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Not Stated
Male Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Driver North Pickups & Panels No Injury
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 27
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Stopped In Road
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver North 2003 HONDA CRV Sport Utility Vehicle Complaint of Pain 20‐06251 12/23/2020 04:22 Wednesday
Sideswipe Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Improper Turning
0' Direction: Not Stated
22107 Hit & Run: Misde Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Not Stated Cell Phone Not In Use
Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Making Left Turn
Veh Type: Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Driver South 2005 FORD EXPEDITION Sport Utility Vehicle No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 38
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Making Left Turn
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver West 2014 HONDA ACCORD Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 20‐06282 12/24/2020 12:22 Thursday
Rear‐End Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Unsafe Speed
0' Direction: Not Stated
22350 Hit & Run: Felony Complaint of Pain # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Unknown Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 60
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Driver South 2009 KIA RIO Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 35
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Stopped In Road
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2016 ACURA MDX Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury Settings for Query:

Street: PARK BLVDNote that when a street is selected, the results return all collisions with that steet as a primary road and all collisions with that street as a secondary road with a distance of 0'.

Sorted By: Date and Time
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 174
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 15
Final Report
mottmac.com

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 175

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: September 27, 2023 ITEM # 7
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-66 APPROVING AN

AMENDMENT TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) FORTHE

APPROPRIATION OF CDBG GRANT FUNDS TO THE CIP BUDGET FOR THE WASHINGTON AND BRODERICK LIGHTING AND SAFETY PROJECT (CIP 15053) INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT PREPARED BY:

Joanna Ortiz, Assistant Engineer
Capital Projects Department
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information for the adoption of Resolution 23-66 approving an amendment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the appropriation of CDBG Grant Funds to the CIP Budget for the Washington and Broderick Lighting and Safety Project (CIP 15053).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1) Adopt Resolution 23-66 approving an amendment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the appropriation of $400,000 of CDBG grant funds to the CIP budget for CIP 15053; and 2) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an increase to the purchase order for electrical materials from JAM Services, Inc, in the amount of $40,252.25; and 3) Authorize the City Manager to execute changes up to 10% ($4,025) of the value of the increase to the purchase order.

BACKGROUND
The City of West Sacramento (City) became eligible to receive federal CDBG Entitlement funding from the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in 2016. In accordance with HUD regulations, the City must develop a five-year Consolidated Plan examining the needs of low-income persons and neighborhoods and setting goals for the use of CDBG funding. Annual Action Plans must also be developed to allocate each year’s CDBG funding for activities that advance the Consolidated Plan goals.

On March 16, 2022, City Council adopted Resolution 22-21 approving a substantial amendment to the CDBG 2020 Annual Action Plan which reallocated $485,852 from the Washington Neighborhood Sidewalk, Lighting and Landscaping Improvement Project to the Washington and Broderick Lighting and Safety Improvement Project.

This activity advanced Goal 2 (Achieve goals in the HUD Challenge Grant funded Washington Realized: A Sustainable Community Strategy) of the 2016-2020 Consolidated Plan. On August 3, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 22-39 which allocated an additional $85,571 towards the Washington and Broderick Lighting and Safety Improvement Project. This funding met Goal #3 (Construct Infrastructure Improvements in LowIncome Neighborhoods) of the 2021-2025 Consolidated Plan.

The Washington and Broderick Lighting and Safety Project will improve pedestrian safety and visibility throughout the Washington and Broderick neighborhoods by replacing and updating streetlights, upgrading and adding pedestrian push buttons at various traffic signals, and installing video detection and traffic signal cabinet upgrades. This project meets the CDBG Low/Mod Area Benefit Objective because it will primarily benefit lowincome residents of Census Tract 101.01. The Traffic Signal and Streetlight’s project area can be found in Attachment 2.

City staff solicited bids for lighting fixtures, signal cabinets, video detection cameras, and pedestrian push buttons through Opengov/ProcureNow.

City staff published an invitation to bid on November 30, 2022. The City received bids from the following two vendors, listed in alphabetical order:

1. AZCO Supply

2. JAM Services, Inc.
176
Washington and Broderick Lighting and Safety Project – JAM Services, Inc.

September 27, 2023

JAM Services, Inc was selected as the lowest, responsive, and responsible bidder and City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a Purchase Order for the procurement of the electrical materials from JAM Services on February 2, 2022.

ANALYSIS
This increase to JAM Services will include taxes that were not originally included in the original procurement.

The requested increase to JAM Services is $40,252.25 plus a $4,025 (10%) contingency for a total of $44,277.25.

CDBG federal grant funds have been identified as an available source of funds for this project. In addition to the increase to JAM Services for the purchase of the hardware, additional funds are necessary for the installation of the hardware. A total transfer of $400,000 of CDBG funds into CIP 15053 has been identified as a sufficient amount to fund both the increase of hardware costs to JAM Services and the cost of installation of the hardware.

Environmental Considerations
Activities receiving CDBG funding must satisfy all National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. HUD requires the City to complete all required NEPA reviews prior to initiating any grant activity. NEPA documentation for the Washington and Broderick Lighting and Safety Improvement Project was identified as an activity that is categorically excluded and not subject to Section 58.5.

NEPA documentation was completed on February 15, 2022.

The proposed project also falls under a Class 3 Categorical Exemption according to CEQA. Class 3 consists of the construction of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, Section 15315, CEQA Guidelines). This project includes replacing and updating streetlights, upgrading and adding pedestrian push buttons at various traffic signals, and installing video detection and traffic signal cabinet upgrades, which is consistent with the activities under the Class 3 exemption. City Council determined the project to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act at the February 2, 2023, Council meeting. Since that time, none of the conditions in Public Resources Code Section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 have occurred and no additional environmental review for the Project is required under CEQA.

Commission Recommendations
The amendment to the CDBG 2020 Annual Action Plan was presented to the Economic Development and Housing (EDH) Commission on February 23, 2022. The EDH Commission unanimously voted to recommend that the City Council approve the substantial amendment to the CDBG 2020 Annual Action Plan. The 2022 Annual Action Plan was presented before the EDH Commission and Parks, Recreation and Intergenerational Services Commission. Both Commissions unanimously voted that the City Council approve the 2022 Annual Action Plan allocating funding for the Washington and Broderick Lighting and Safety Project.

Strategic Plan Integration
This project, along with its use of CDBG funding, is a critical component of the City Council Strategic Principles, specifically Core Services and Infrastructure: Sustain a financially sound city in which everyone feels safe and secure, with quality services and well-maintained infrastructure.

Alternatives
The City Council’s primary alternatives of action are summarized below:
1) Approve the recommended actions as stated above.
2) Delay or revise the recommended action.
3) Not approve the recommended action or cancel the project.

Alternatives 2 and 3 are not recommended as this is a grant-funded project with a tight delivery schedule. Any changes or modifications to the scope of the Project or the documents required to move the Project forward will impact the funding and timing available for the Project.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Capital Projects Department and coordinated with and reviewed by the Economic Development and Housing Department and the Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
This project is included in the City’s current Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as CIP 15053 – Washington and Broderick Lighting and Safety Project. With the requested CIP amendment which will appropriate additional 177
Washington and Broderick Lighting and Safety Project – JAM Services, Inc.

September 27, 2023

CDBG grant funds to the budget for CIP 15053, CIP 15053 will have sufficient funds available for this increase to the purchase order.

ATTACHMENTS
1) Resolution 23-66
2) JAM Services, Inc Breakdown
178
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 23-66

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) FOR

THE APPROPRIATION OF CDBG GRANT FUNDS TO THE CIP BUDGET FOR THE WASHINGTON AND BRODERICK LIGHTING AND SAFETY PROJECT (CIP 15053) WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 22-21, allocating $458,852 to the Washington and Broderick Lighting and Safety Improvement Project on March 16, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 22-39 on August 3, 2022 , allocating an additional $85,571 of CDBG funds to the Washington and Broderick Lighting and Safety Improvement Project; and
WHEREAS, City staff has determined that an additional location within the project area will require an upgraded video detection system, therefore staff is requesting additional funds to add this element to the project; and
WHEREAS, City staff has determined that an additional $400,000 is a sufficient amount to fund both the increase in costs to purchase the additional hardware and for the installation of all hardware identified for this project; and
WHEREAS, City staff wish to transfer an additional $400,000 of CDBG grant funds to CIP 15053 to fund both the costs to purchase the additional hardware and for the installation of all hardware identified for this project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of West Sacramento as follows:

1. The City Council hereby approves an amendment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) by the appropriation of CDBG grant funds to the CIP budget for CIP 15053 as listed below:

SOURCES
$400,000 400-9900-4640/400-15053-4640 Other Federal Grants $400,000 TOTAL SOURCES
USES
$400,000 400-9900-5530/400-15053-5800 Washington and Broderick Safety Project $400,000 TOTAL USES
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of September, 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:
179
Attachment 1
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
180
JAM SERVICES, INC.
958 E Airway Blvd
LIVERMORE, CA 94550
____________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone (925) 455-5267
Fax (925) 455-5348
PRICE QUOTATION – JGM032423ZREV1
City of West Sacramento
3/24/23
JAM Services is pleased to provide the following price quotation for the subject project.

QTY (1) 4-Approach Iteris Hybrid Video/Radar Detection System to Include:
• (2) Iteris Vector Hybrid Video/Radar Detector Unit
• (2) Iteris Next Video Detection Camera
• (2) 6’ Riser Mount (For SMA Installation)
• (1) Iteris Next Rack Mount CCU
• (2) Iteris DVP Dual Video Processor
• (1) 10” LCD Monitor w/Swivel Bracket
• (1) 1,000’Cat5E Cable

UNIT PRICE: $25,950.00 TOTAL PRICE: $25,950.00
TAX (8.25%): $ 2,140.88
FREIGHT: INCL
GRAND TOTAL: $28,090.88

TAXES RELATED TO THE BALANCE OF MATERIALS ON WASHINGTON AND

BRODERICK LIGHTING PROJECT
TOTAL TAXES: $40,252.25
Freight allowed, but tax to be added as determined by the final BOM and the delivery address. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at 925-455-5267.

Thank you - Jason Momaney
181
$ 157,361.00
$ 282,785.00
$ 440,146.00
$ 49,200.00
$ 12,982.28
$ 23,210.96
$ 4,059.00
$ 40,252.25
$ 40,252.25
Original Sell Base
Original Sell Opt
Total Sell (less tax)
Amendment 1 - Iteris vantage system (minus tax)
Tax Base
Tax Opt
Tax Am 1
Total Tax
Amendment 2 Total
Total PO $ 529,598.25
182

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: September 27, 2023 ITEM # 8
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-68 REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE AND SUBMIT AN FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT

ACT CLAIM TO THE SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Stephanie Chhan, Senior Transportation Planner
Community Development Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
This report's purpose is to request City Council authorization to execute and submit the 2023/2024 Transportation Development Act Claim to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 23-68 requesting authorization to execute and submit the FY 2023/24 Transportation Development Act claim to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments.

BACKGROUND
The Transportation Development Act (TDA) is administered by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and provides two sources of public transportation funding for local governments: Local Transportation Funds (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) funds. The funds are intended for the development and support of public transportation needs that exist in California and are allocated to counties based on population, taxable sales and transit performance. LTF funds are primarily intended to support public transit services, but can support a wide variety of transportation programs including planning activities, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, road rehabilitation or other community transit, bus and rail projects. However, STA funds have more restrictive criteria and regulations that must be met in order to fund eligible expenses. Unlike LTF, STA funds may not be allocated for fund administration, streets, roads, or pedestrian/bicycle facility purposes.

The City must annually submit a claim for review and approval by the SACOG Board of Directors to claim its allocation of TDA funds. Upon SACOG approval of the TDA Claim, Yolo County disburses the allocation request to the City. West Sacramento anticipates $4,425,334 in FY 2023/24 TDA fund revenues, per the Yolo County Estimated Findings of Apportionment updated in March 2023, in addition to $2,697,967.13 fund balance carried over from prior years.

ANALYSIS
The attached FY 2023/24 SACOG TDA Claim Packet (Attachment 2) reflects the FY 2023/24 projected expenses summarized in the table below.

FY 2023/24 Projected TDA Expenses Amount Source
YoloTD Fixed Route Services $2,245,725 STA + LTF
YoloTD ADA Paratransit Services $416,000 STA
YoloTD Administrative Planning Fees $369,078.00 STA
Via On-Demand Transit Services $2,899,378 LTF
Bus Shelter & Yard Maintenance $35,000 LTF
SACOG Annual Planning Fees $113,846 LTF
TOTAL $6,079,027
In June 2023, City Council approved Resolution 23-42 allocating up to $3,102,730 from the Transportation Development Act Fund. After reconciling the FY 2023/24 Via On-Demand Transit Services budget, which was offset with $38,351.79 in FY 2022/23 fare revenues, and further reduced by the auditor direction to move the Via contract from a capital project work order to the TDA fund, thus eliminating the additional Indirect Cost Allocation Plan (ICAP) charged to capital projects to recuperate indirect costs in addition to direct staff costs, the amount 183
Resolution 23-68 FY23-24 TDA Claim
September 27, 2023

staff will request is reduced to $2,899,378.21 - the amount needed to support the FY 2023/24 Via On-Demand Transit Services contract with NoMad Transit.

Fund balances from previous years are requested to pay for the FY 2023/24 TDA claim expenses. The table below summarizes current allocations, claims, and remaining reserve fund balances for FY 2023/24.

Carry Over from
Previous Years
FY 2023/2024
TDA Allocation
FY 2023/2043
Total Available
FY 2023/2024
TDA Claim Expenses
FY 2023/2024
Remaining Balance
LTF $810,417.14 $3,794,876 $4,605,293.14 $3,561,019.22 $1,044,273.92 STA $1,887,549.99 $630,458 $2,518,007.99 $2,518,007.99 $0 TDA
Totals $2,697,967.13 $4,425,334 $7,123,301.13 $6,079,027.21 $1,044,273.92 Environmental Considerations
Not applicable.

Commission Recommendation
Not applicable.

Strategic Plan Integration
Approving the submission of the annual TDA Claim supports the City’s mission to provide quality municipal services and inspire community improvements that add value to the lives of our residents, and directly implements the City’s Strategic Plan goals of fostering Sustainable Mobility Systems through the provision of convenient and sustainable transportation choices, supports climate goals by encouraging shared trips to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and preserve inclusive economic development strategies by connecting residents and workers to opportunities through affordable transportation services.

Alternatives
1) Authorize staff to submit the TDA Claim to SACOG as presented herein. 2) Direct staff to modify the TDA Claim and return to City Council for further consideration. 3) Reject staff’s request to submit the TDA Claim to SACOG and provide staff with direction on next steps.

Staff recommends Alternative 1 as to not delay funding for city services.

Coordination and Review
This report and the FY 2023/24 TDA Claim was coordinated by the Transportation & Mobility Division of the Community Development Department, in conjunction with the YCTD budget process and City Council approved West Sacramento On-Demand Rideshare program budget. Review was conducted by the City’s Finance Department and SACOG staff.

Budget/Cost Impact
As of FY 2023/24, the current TDA fund balance was accrued as a receivable with SACOG for $7,123,301.13.

The approval of this report will authorize the City to submit a claim to draw $6,079,027.21 for FY 2023/24 budgeted expenses, leaving an unearned remaining balance of $1,044,273.92 for future public transportation and other eligible costs. The City Council previously approved an allocation of up to $3,102,730 toward the Via On-Demand Rideshare program in FY 2023/24 costs on June 7, 2023. Staff has reconciled budgets and made changes to the Via On Demand Rideshare Program and the transit planning and coordination costs, as reflected in the agenda report, thus reducing the amount required to fund this contract.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution 23-68 Requesting Authorization to Execute and Submit FY 2023/24 TDA Claim to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) for Approval

2. Draft FY 2023/24 TDA Claim Packet

3. SACOG FY 2023/24 LTF Findings of Apportionment and STA Allocation 184
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 23-68

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF WEST SACRAMENTO PROVIDING AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE AND SUBMIT THE FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM TO THE SACRAMENTO AREA

COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
WHEREAS, the State of California enacted the Transportation Development Act (TDA) in 1972 to provide funds for transportation needs each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, Section 99260 of the Public Utilities Code requires local agencies to file an estimated claim of transportation needs for each fiscal year with the Regional Transportation Planning Agency; and
WHEREAS, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) is the designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency to receive such claims for approval pursuant to the rules and regulations adopted by the Secretary of the Business and Transportation Agency; and
WHEREAS, SACOG has adopted a finding of apportionment for Local Transportation Funds and an allocation of State Assistance Funds for Fiscal Year 2020/21; and
WHEREAS, the City of West Sacramento has identified $6,079,027.21 in transportation funding needs for Fiscal Year 2023/24.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the attached Fiscal Year 2023/24 Transportation Development Act Claim be hereby approved by the City Council for execution and submittal to Sacramento Area Council of Governments by the City Manager, or his designee, for approval.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento this 27th day of September 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
___________________________________
Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
185
Attachment 2

TRANSPORTATION

DEVELOPMENT ACT

CLAIM PACKET
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
1415 L Street. Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
186

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT

CLAIM CHECKLIST
Please check the following, items as being either included with the attached TDA claim package or are on file at SACOG.

Item Claimant Attached On file
 TDA-1 Annual Transportation Development Claim All claimants ☒ N/A  TDA-2 Project and Expenditure Plan (for the fiscal year of this claim and the prior fiscal year) All claimants ☒ N/A  TDA-3 Status of Previously Approved Projects All claimants ☒ N/A  TDA-4 Statement of Conformance All claimants ☒ N/A
 TDA-5 TDA Claim Certification All claimants ☒ N/A
 Resolution by governing body that authorized the claim All claimants ☒ N/A If Claimant is a Transit Agency or Jurisdiction is Contracting for Transit Service  CHP Safety Compliance Report
(Completed within the past 13 months)
Claimants for
transit service ☐ ☐N/A
 Adopted or proposed budget for the fiscal year of the claim
Claimants for
transit service ☐ ☒
 Signed copy of transit service contract Claimants for transit service ☐ ☒
 Area wide transfer agreement, resolution
Claimants that
allow intersystem transfers
☐ ☒
 Information establishing eligibility under efficiency criteria – STA Operator Qualifying Criteria calculation based on Section 99314.6
Claimants for
revenue-based
STA funds
☐ ☒
 Certification that claim is consistent with Capital
Improvement Program
Claimants for
bike/ped facilities ☐ ☐N/A
 Compliance with PUC Sec. 99155 & 99155.5 Claimants for transit service ☐ ☒
 Copy of Ten Year Capital & Operations Program Claimants for transit service ☐ ☐N/A
187
TDA-1

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM
TO: Sacramento Area Council of Governments
1415 L Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
FROM: Claimant City of West Sacramento__________________ Address 1110 West Capitol Avenue__________________
City West Sacramento_______ Zip Code 95691______
Contact Person Stephanie Chhan/Holly Lyon__________
Phone (916) 617-5306___ Email [email protected] [email protected]
The above claimant hereby requests, in accordance with authority granted under the Transportation Development Act and applicable rules and regulations adopted by the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG), that its request for funding be approved as follows:

LTF $ 810,417.14 (FY 2022/2023)
$ 2,750,602.08 (FY 2023/2024)
STA $ 8,139.99 (FY 2018/2019)
$ 477,692.00 (FY 2019/2020)
$ 282,114.00 (FY 2020/2021)
$ 461,163.00 (FY 2021/2022)
$ 658,441.00 (FY 2022/2023)
$ 630,458.00 (FY 2023/2024)
STA-SGR $ (FY / )
(Specify STA and/or STA-SGR)
Submitted By Stephanie Chhan
Title Senior Transportation Planner
Date
188
TDA-2

ANNUAL PROJECT AND EXPENDITURE PLAN
Claimant: City of West Sacramento Fiscal Year: 2023/24

SOURCES OF FUNDING
Project Title and TDA
Article Number TDA
LTF
TDA
STA
TDA
STASGR
Transit
Fares
Measure
A
Road
Fund
Developer
Fees/Const.

Tax
Federal/
State
Other TOTAL
YoloTD Fixed Route
Service. Article 8 Section
99400 (c) / Article 4
Section 6731 (b)
$512,795.01 $1,732,929.99 $2,245,725.00
YoloTD Paratransit
Operations. Article 4
Section 6731 (b)
$416,000 $416,000.00
YoloTD Administrative
Planning. Article 4 Section
6731 (b)
$369,078.00 $369,078.00
Bus Shelter Maintenance
and Harbor Yard
Article 8 Section 99260 (a)
$35,000 $35,000.00
Via On-Demand Transit
Planning & Operations.

Article 8 Section 99400 (c)
$2,899,378.21 $401,993.79 $3,301,372.00
SACOG Planning $113,846 $113,846.00
TOTAL REQUEST $3,561,019.22 $2,518,007.99 $ $401,993.79 $ $ $ $ $ $6,481,021.00 189
TDA-3

STATUS OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECTS
Instructions: Describe the status of all prior fiscal year TDA claim projects and any projects from previous years, which are still active.
 Include both operating and capital projects
 Approved amounts should be as specified in TDA claims approved by SACOG  Expenditures should be to date
 Project status should be either "Complete" or "Active" Fiscal
Year Project Title Amount Approved Expenditures Project Status 17/18 STA FY 22/23 ADA
Paratransit
Operations & Planning
$38,316.00 $38,316.00 Complete
18/19 STA FY 23/22 ADA
Paratransit
Operations & Planning
$246,684.00 $246,684.00 Complete
21/22 STA FY 22/23 Yolobus Fixed
Route Operations
$2,204,881.13 $2,204,881.13 Complete
22/23 LTF FY 22/23 Yolobus Fixed
Route Operations
$515,118.87 $515,118.87 Complete
22/23 LTF FY 22/23 Via OnDemand
Transit Planning &
Operations
$2,484,600.99 $2,484,600.99 Complete
18/19 LTF FY 22/23 Via OnDemand
Transit Planning &
Operations
$192,272.01 $113,845.01 Complete;
City will
expend
remaining
funding for
FY23/24 Via
On-Demand
Transit
Planning &
Operations
22/23 LTF FY 22/23 Bus Shelter
Maintenance
$30,000 $30,000 Complete
22/23 LTF FY 22/23 SACOG
Planning
$118,767.00 $118,767.00 Complete
TOTAL $5,830,640.00 $5,752,213.00
190
TDA-4

STATEMENT OF CONFORMANCE
Form TDA-4 must be completed and signed by the Administrative Office of the submitting claimant.

The City of West Sacramento hereby certifies that the Transportation Development Act claim for fiscal year(s) 2023/24 in the amount of $3,561,019.22 (LTF), $2,518,007.99 (STA) and $_0 (STA-SGR) for a total of $ $6,079,027.21 conforms to the requirements of the Transportation Development Act and applicable rules and regulations. (See Attachment A for listing of conformance requirements)
Certified by Chief Financial Officer
Title Director of Finance
Date
191
TDA-5
TDA Claim Certification Form
I, Roberta Raper, Chief Finance Officer for the City of West Sacramento, do hereby attest, as required under the California Code of Regulations, Title 21, Division 3, Chapter 2, Section 6632, to the reasonableness and accuracy of the following:
(a) The attached budget or proposed budget for FY 2023/2024. (b) The attached certification by the Department of the California Highway Patrol verifying that YoloTD is in compliance with Section 1808.1 of the Vehicle Code, as required in Public Utilities Code Section 99251.
(c) The estimated amount of $6,079,027.21 maximum eligibility for moneys from the local transportation fund and the state assistance fund, as defined in Section 6634, is $6,079,027.21.
(Signature) Chief Financial Officer
City of West Sacramento
(Agency Name)
(Date)
192

ATTACHMENT A

CONFORMANCE - TDA CLAIMANTS
Standard Assurances
1) 180-Day Certified Fiscal Audit (Applies to all claims; SACOG administers fiscal audits for all operators in the region, with the exception of the Sacramento Regional Transit District) -Assurance that the claimant has submitted a satisfactory independent fiscal audit, with required certification, to SACOG and to the State Controller not more than 180 days after the end of the prior fiscal year (Sections 99245 and 6664). 2) 90-Day Annual State Controller Report (Applies to all transit claims) – Assurance that claimant has submitted this report to the State Controller in conformance with the uniform system of accounts and record not more than 90 days after the end of the prior fiscal year (110 days for electronically submissions) (Section 99243). Claimant should also supply a copy of the State Controller report (SCR) to SACOG no more than 120 days after the end of the prior fiscal year.
3) Use of Federal Funds (Applies to all Article 4 claims) –  Claimant filing a claim for TDA funds for capital intensive projects pursuant to Section 99268.7 certifies that is has made every effort to obtain federal funding for any project which is funded pursuant to Section 99268.7.
 Claimant qualifying for funds pursuant to Section 99268.1 and tiling a claim for TDA funds in excess of the amount allowed by Section 99268 certifies that such funds are required in order to obtain maximum federal operating funds in the year such funds are claimed pursuant to Section 6633.1.
4) Elderly/Disabled (Applies to all transit claims) – That the transit operator is question is in compliance with Section 99155 pertaining to reduced transit fares for elderly and disabled persons and Section 99155.5 pertaining to dial-a-ride and paratransit services. 5) Farebox Recovery Ratio Requirements (Applies to all transit claims) – Claimant filing a claim for LTF or STA funds certifies that it will maintain for the project that ratio of fare revenues and local support to operating cost required under Sections 99268 (including all subparts), 99270.1, 99270.2, 99270.6, and under the “Farebox Requirements for Urbanized and Non-Urbanized Service’ adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors on March 18, 1982, whichever is appropriate.

Exceptions:
6) 50% Expenditure Limitation (Applies only to claims for LTF) – Claimant certifies that it 193
was in compliance with Section 99268 certifying that it (the claim) will not exceed 50% of the amount required to meet operating, maintenance, capital and debt service costs of the transit system after deduction of approved federal grants and STA funds estimated to be received for the system. (A claimant can received up to 100% of capital costs for gradeseparated mass transit projects under Section 99268 and 99281, for capital intensive transit-related projects under Section 99268.7. and for extension of services under Section 6619.1 and 6633.8)
7) Extension of Services (Applies only to LTF claims) - Claimant who received an allocation of LTF funds for extension of service pursuant to Section 99268.8 certifies that it will file a report of these services pursuant to Section 6633.8(b) within 90 days after close of the fiscal year in which that allocation was granted.
8) Retirement System (Applies only to LTF claims) - Claimant certifies that (1) the current cost of its retirement system is fully funded with respect to the officers and employees of its public transportation system; or (2) the operator is implementing a plan approved by SACOG which will fully find the retirement system for such officers and employees within 40 years; or (3) the operator has a private pension plan which sets aside and invests, on a current bases, funds sufficient to provide for the payment of future pension benefits and which is fully compliant with the requirements stated in Section 99272 and 99273. 9) Maximum Use of Local Transportation Funds (Applies only to Sacramento Regional Transit District STA claim) - That the operator is receiving the maximum allowable amount from the Local Transportation Fund.
10) Part-Time Employees (Applies only to claims for STA) - Claimant certifies that it is not precluded by any contract entered into on or after June 28, 1979 from employing part-time drivers or contracting with common carriers of persons operating under a franchise or license. Claimant further certifies that no person who was a full-time employee on June 28, 1979 shall have his/her employment terminated or his/her regular hours of employment, excluding overtime, reduced as a result of it employing part-time drivers or contracting with such common carriers.
11) Conformance with the Metropolitan (Regional) Transportation Plan (Applies only to claims for STA) - Claimant certifies that all of the purposes for claim expenditures are in conformance with the current Short Range Transit Plan, which is an appendix to the Metropolitan (Regional) Transportation Plan.
12) Full Use of Federal Funds (Applies only to STA claims) - Claimant certifies that it is making full use of federal funds available under the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended.
194
13) Implementation of Productivity Improvements (Applies only to STA claims) - Claimant certifies that the operator has made a reasonable effort to implement the productivity improvements recommended pursuant to Section 99244.
195
County's Estimated June 30, 2023 Balance $0
Local Transportation Fund Income 2023-2024 $109,000,000 Less: County Administrative Costs -$22,000
Less: SACOG Administrative Costs -$1,217,284
Balance for Allocation $107,760,716
Jurisdication Population 1/
% of Total
Population
County
Finding of
Apportionment
SACOG
Planning
Available to
Jurisdiction
Pedestrians
& Bicycles 2/
Available to
Jurisdiction for
Article 4 and
Article 8
Sacramento County
(Unincorporated) 604,272 38.33% $41,301,560 $64,430 $41,237,130 $826,031 $2,040,297 Citrus Heights 86,367 5.48% $5,903,123 $0 $5,903,123 $118,062 $0 Elk Grove 176,972 11.22% $12,095,910 $0 $12,095,910 $241,918 $0 Folsom 84,592 5.37% $5,781,803 $0 $5,781,803 $115,636 $0 Galt 25,239 1.60% $1,725,068 $51,752 $1,673,316 $34,501 $1,638,814 Isleton 780 0.05% $53,312 $1,599 $51,713 $1,066 $50,647 Rancho Cordova 80,359 5.10% $5,492,480 $0 $5,492,480 $109,850 $0 City of Sacramento 518,037 32.86% $35,407,459 $0 $35,407,459 $708,149 $0 TOTALS 1,576,618 100.00% $107,760,716 $117,782 $107,642,934 $2,155,214 $3,729,758 Jurisdication
Finding of
Apportionment
Finding of
Apportionment
Less Ped &
Bicycle
% of Population
Within
SRTD District
Allocation of
Finding of
Apportionment
SACOG
Planning
Amount
Available for To
Paratransit, Inc.

Amount
Available To
SRTD
Sacramento County
(Unincorporated) $41,301,560 $40,475,529 94.8% $38,370,801 $1,174,616 $1,918,540 $35,277,645 Rancho Cordova $5,492,480 $5,382,631 100% $5,382,631 $164,774 $269,132 $4,948,725 City of Sacramento $35,407,459 $34,699,310 100% $34,699,310 $1,062,224 $1,734,966 $31,902,121 City of Citrus Heights $5,903,123 $5,785,060 100% $5,785,060 $177,094 $289,253 $5,318,714 City of Folsom $5,781,803 $5,666,167 100% $5,666,167 $173,454 $283,308 $5,209,404 City of Elk Grove $12,095,910 $11,853,992 100% $11,853,992 $362,877 $592,700 $10,898,415 TOTALS $105,982,336 $103,862,689 $101,757,961 $3,115,040 $5,087,898 $93,555,024 PI-30% $1,526,369
SacRT=70% $3,561,529 $97,116,552
Regional Transit $97,116,552
Paratransit $1,526,369
SACOG $3,232,821
Ped/Bike $2,155,214
Other Jurisdictions $3,729,758
Total $107,760,716

1. Sources: Report E-5, Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit, 2022

2. Amount available to jurisdictions for pedestrian and bicycle purposes (Article 3,Section 99233.3)

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
March 2023

FINDINGS OF APPORTIONMENT

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS (LTF)
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT and PARATRANSIT
Sac County; 2:38 PM2/6/2023 FY 23-24 LTF-FOA-4-County.xlsx Attachment 3
196
Attachment A
County's Estimated June 30, 2023 Balance $270,819
Local Transportation Fund Income 2023-2024 5,899,559
Less: County Administrative Costs -2,500
Less: SACOG Administrative Costs -68,895
Balance for Allocation $6,098,983
Jurisdication Population 1/
% of Total
Population
County
Finding of
Apportionment
SACOG
Planning
Available to
Jurisdiction for
Article 4 and
Article 8 2/
Sutter County
(Unincorporated) 20,088 20.26% $1,235,729 $37,072 $1,198,657 Live Oak 9,394 9.48% $577,879 $17,336 $560,543
Yuba City 69,663 70.26% $4,285,374 $128,561 $4,156,813
TOTALS 99,145 100.00% $6,098,983 $182,969 $5,916,013

1. Sources: Report E-5, Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit, 2022

COUNTY OF SUTTER

FINDINGS OF APPORTIONMENT

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS (LTF)

2. Funds available for projects and programs under Article 4 and Article 8.

All or a portion may be available to the Sutter County depending on outcome of unmet needs finding.

March 2023
Fiscal Year 2022-2023
Sutter; 2:38 PM2/6/2023 FY 23-24 LTF-FOA-4-County.xlsx
Attachment 3
197
Attachment A
County's Estimated June 30, 2023 Balance $2,791,516 $16,074,020 Local Transportation Fund Income 2023-2024 13,282,504
Less: County Administrative Costs -10,000
Less: SACOG Administrative Costs -179,435
Balance for Allocation $15,884,585
Jurisdication Population 1/
% of Total
Population
County
Finding of
Apportionment
SACOG
Planning
Available to
Jurisdiction for
Article 4 and
Article 8 2/
Yolo County
(Unincorporated) 35,900 16.23% $2,578,422 $77,353 $2,501,069 Davis 64,869 29.33% $4,659,043 $139,771 $4,519,271
West Sacramento 52,837 23.89% $3,794,876 $113,846 $3,681,030 Winters 7,422 3.36% $533,065 $15,992 $517,073
Woodland 60,137 27.19% $4,319,179 $129,575 $4,189,604
TOTALS 221,165 100.00% $15,884,585 $476,538 $15,408,047

COUNTY OF YOLO

FINDINGS OF APPORTIONMENT

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS (LTF)

2. Funds available for projects and programs under Article 4 and Article 8.

All or a portion may be available to the Yolo County depending on outcome of unmet needs finding.

1. Sources: Report E-5, Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit, 2022 Fiscal Year 2022-2023
March 2023
Yolo; 2:38 PM2/6/2023 FY 23-24 LTF-FOA-4-County.xlsx
Attachment 3
198
Attachment A
County's Estimated June 30, 2023 Balance $262,662 2,813,676 Local Transportation Fund Income 2023-2024 2,551,014
Less: County Administrative Costs -750
Less: SACOG Administrative Costs -31,420
Balance for Allocation $2,781,506
Jurisdication Population 1/
% of Total
Population
County
Finding of
Apportionment
SACOG
Planning
Available to
Jurisdiction for
Article 4 and
Article 8 2/
Yuba County
(Unincorporated) 65,787 79.96% $2,224,089 $66,723 $2,157,366 Marysville 12,824 15.59% $433,546 $13,006 $420,540
Wheatland 3,664 4.45% $123,870 $3,716 $120,154
TOTALS 82,275 100.00% $2,781,506 $83,445 $2,698,060

1. Sources: Report E-5, Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit, 2022

FINDINGS OF APPORTIONMENT

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS (LTF)

COUNTY OF YUBA

2. Funds available for projects and programs under Article 4 and Article 8.

All or a portion may be available to the Yuba County depending on outcome of unmet needs finding.

March 2023
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
Yuba; 2:38 PM2/6/2023 FY 23-24 LTF-FOA-4-County.xlsx
Attachment 3
199
County Administration
Fees Planning Fees Total Fees
Sacramento $1,217,284 $3,232,822 $4,450,106
Sutter $68,895 $182,969 $251,864
Yolo $179,435 $476,537 $655,972
Yuba $31,420 $83,445 $114,865
Total $1,497,034 $3,975,773 $5,472,807
FY22-23-Includes Sac. County revisions $5,187,707
difference $285,100
Change in revenue estimates 5.50%
Fiscal Year 2023-2024-March
Attachment 3
200
Attachment A

POPULATION
AS A ALLOCATION 2/ ALLOCATION 2/ STA
JURISDICTION POPULATION 1/ % OF TOTAL PUC 99313 PUC 99314 Total

SACRAMENTO COUNTY
Unincorporated 604,272 30.53% $7,210,256 3/ $97,600 $7,307,856 Citrus Heights-SacRT 86,367 4.36% $1,030,543 4/ $1,030,543 Elk Grove-SacRT 176,972 8.94% $2,111,654 4/ $0 $2,111,654 Folsom-SacRT 84,592 4.27% $1,009,363 4/ $0 $1,009,363
Galt 25,239 1.28% $301,155 $301,155
Isleton 780 0.04% $9,307 $9,307
Rancho Cordova-SacRT 80,359 4.06% $958,855 4/ $958,855
Sacramento-SacRT 518,037 26.17% $6,181,288 4/ $6,181,288 Sacramento Regional Transit District NA NA NA $7,267,691 $7,267,691

YOLO COUNTY
Unincorporated 35,900 1.81% $428,364 $428,364
Davis 64,869 3.28% $774,026 $242,764 $1,016,790
West Sacramento 52,837 2.67% $630,458 $630,458
Winters 7,422 0.37% $88,560 $88,560
Woodland 60,137 3.04% $717,563 $717,563
Yolo County Transportation District NA NA NA $384,950 $384,950

SUTTER COUNTY
Unincorporated 20,088 1.01% $239,693 5/ $239,693
Live Oak 9,394 0.47% $112,090 5/ $112,090
Yuba City 69,663 3.52% $831,228 5/ $831,228

YUBA COUNTY
Unincorporated 65,787 3.32% $784,979 5/ $784,979
Marysville 12,824 0.65% $153,018 5/ $153,018
Wheatland 3,664 0.19% $43,719 5/ $43,719
Yuba-Sutter Transit Authority NA NA NA $110,271 $110,271 TOTAL 1,979,203 100.00% $23,616,121 6/ $8,103,276 $31,719,397 % in RT District Transfer to SRTD Sacramento County
County of Sacramento Total $7,210,256 96.4% $6,950,687 $259,569 Rancho Cordova City Total $958,855 100.0% $958,855
Sacramento City Total $6,181,288 100.0% $6,181,288
Citrus Heights City Total $1,030,543 100.0% $1,030,543
Folsom City Total $1,009,363 100.0% $1,009,363
Elk Grove City total $2,111,654 100.0% $2,111,654
Available to SRTD $18,242,390 Total $18,242,390
Available to County of Sacramento $259,569 99314 $7,267,691 Available to Yuba-Sutter Transit Authority $2,274,998 Total Allocation 25,510,081

1. Sources: Report E-5, Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit, 2022

2. Entire amount must be used for transportation planning and mass transportation purposes.

3. 96.4% is reserved for Sacramento Regional Transit District. 4. 100% is reserved for Sacramento Regional Transit District.

5. 100% is reserved for Yuba-Sutter Transit Authority. 6. This is the total PUC Section 99313 Allocation to SACOG for the fiscal year March 2023

SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Regional Share of Statewide PUC Allocation: $31,719,397

ALLOCATION OF STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS (STA)
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
PUBLIC UTILITY CODE SECTION 99313 & 99314
9931311:53 AM:2/13/2023 FY 23-24 STA Allocation.xls
Attachment 3
201

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: September 27, 2023 ITEM # 9
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23- 73 ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED FOR SUBDIVISION 5176, “THE RIVERS PHASE II”
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [x] Staff
[ ] Other
Mark Collier, Principal Engineer
Community Development Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
To accept public improvements constructed as a requirement for approval of Subdivision 5176, “The Rivers, Phase II”.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 23-73, accepting the public improvements required of Subdivision 5176, “The Rivers, Phase II”.

BACKGROUND
Final Map No. 5176 and the associated Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Private Road Agreement were approved by Council on November 17, 2021. As a condition of approval of said map, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) was executed which obligates the developer to complete all required public improvements necessary to serve the property. The required improvements include water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage improvements located within the boundary of the Map.

ANALYSIS
The required public improvements for Subdivision No. 5176 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Community Development Department. Acceptance of the improvements will allow for the release of posted securities per the terms outlined in the applicable Subdivision Improvement Agreement.

Environmental Considerations
The Planning Commission found the tentative map to be compliant with CEQA at the time of its approval. No additional findings are required with acceptance of the public improvements.

Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission conditionally approved Tentative Map 4732 on May 18, 2006.

Strategic Plan Integration
Acceptance of these improvements is consistent with the City’s “Principals to Guide the Future” by providing for “Vibrant Neighborhoods”.

Alternatives
Council may choose not to accept the public improvements at this time.

Coordination and Review
The completion of the required improvements has been approved by the City Engineer and the Community Development Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
There is no known fiscal impact.

ATTACHMENTS
1) Resolution 23-73
2) Vicinity Map
202
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 23-73

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO FOR ACCEPTANCE OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH SUBDIVISION 5176, “THE RIVERS”
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of West Sacramento adopted Resolution 21-96 on November 17, 2021, approving the Final Map, Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and Private Road Agreement for Subdivision 5176, “The Rivers, Phase II; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreements required the completion of certain public improvements; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement required the completion of all public improvements required to serve the Final Map area, and
WHEREAS, the City Community Development Department has determined that all required public improvements have been satisfactorily completed per City Standard Specifications; and
WHEREAS, the developer has requested that the completed improvements be accepted by the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of West Sacramento hereby accepts the public improvements completed as a requirement of Final Map 5176, “The Rivers, Phase II”, and approves the release of associated securities as provided for in the applicable Subdivision Improvement Agreement.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento this 27th day of September, 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
________________________________
Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
203
Attachment 2
Vicinity Map
North
204

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: September 27, 2023 ITEM # 10
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

WITH SCI CONSULTING TO PRODUCE A STORM DRAINAGE & STORM WATER

FINANCE PLAN
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Candido Ramirez, Civil Engineer
Community Development Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to acquire Council approval of a contract for professional services with SCI Consulting Group to produce a Financing Plan to implement recommendations made in the Storm Drainage/Stormwater Master Plan.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve a $95,828 professional services contract with SCI Consulting Group;

1. Delegate authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the contract;

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the Contract for Services, with approval from the City Attorney; and

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute amendments or change orders up to 15% ($14,374) of the contract.

BACKGROUND
In November 2016, the City retained a consultant to evaluate the City’s internal drainage system and complete a citywide Storm Drainage and Storm Water Master Plan (SD/SW MP).

On June 1, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 22-75 approving the Final SD/SW MP and its findings.

The plan evaluated the effects of stormwater runoff from a 100-year, 24-hour storm. For hydraulics, the plan evaluated conveyance pipes greater than 21 inches in diameter, pump stations, open channels and detention basins.

The North Basin drainage system has now been evaluated. Three of seven watersheds in this basin need significant upgrades. The master plan identifies approximately $133 million worth of capital improvements for the north basin.

The South Basin has been re-evaluated as part of the development that has occurred since the City was incorporated in 1987. South Basin drainage improvements were planned to be covered by drainage impact fees established in the early 2000’s. However, recent analysis indicates the need to upgrade the existing infrastructure and new improvement projects, which will have a cost of approximately $27 million.

ANALYSIS
At the June 1, 2022 meeting, City Council authorized staff to solicit proposals to prepare a financing plan for the implementation of improvements recommended in the SD/SW MP.

City staff contemplated soliciting proposals from a list of pre-qualified finance consultants. As the scope of work was developed, it became apparent that expanding solicitation beyond the pre-qualified firms was appropriate.

Community Development, Finance, Capital Projects and RD-900 staff collaborated in preparing a Request for Proposals (RFP) solicitation. OpenGov Procurement was used to request proposals on March 17, 2023. Four firms (SCI, LWA, NBS and Raftelis) submitted proposals by the April 21, 2023 deadline. The final evaluation by Community Development and Finance staff was completed by May 10, 2023. SCI Consulting Group was the 205
Storm Drainage / Storm Water Finance Plan
September 27, 2023