West Sacramento City Council
November 1, 2023

WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL AND WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR

AGENCY & WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
City Council Regular Meeting
NOVEMBER 1, 2023 AGENDA
Martha Guerrero, Mayor
Quirina Orozco, Mayor Pro Tem
Norma Alcala, Council Member
Dawnté Early, Council Member
Verna Sulpizio Hull, Council Member
Aaron Laurel, City Manager
Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney
6:00 PM Closed Session Call to Order
7:00 PM Regular Meeting Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Land Acknowledgment
The meeting will be held at City Hall, City Council Chambers, 1110 West Capitol Avenue, West Sacramento GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART I

1. PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WITHIN THE

JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL
The Council is prohibited from discussing issues not on the agenda brought to them at this time.

According to State Law (the Brown Act), items must first be noticed on the agenda before any discussion or action.

PRESENTATIONS

2. City Manager's Office
PRESENTATION OF THE 2023 HELEN PUTNAM AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE IN CITYBUSINESS RELATIONS FOR THE WEST SACRAMENTO HOME RUN PAID INTERNSHIP

PROGRAM
Objective: To receive the 2023 Helen Putnam Award for Excellence in City-Business Relations for the West Sacramento Home Run Paid Internship Program from the League of California Cities.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council receive the presentation of the 2023 Helen Putnam Award for Excellence in City-Business Relations to the City for the West Sacramento Home Run Paid Internship Program from the League of California Cities.

3. City Manager's Office
Anyone wishing to address the Council, or any agenda item, may fill out the Request to Speak card and present it to the City Clerk prior to the completion of staff presentation. Items on the Consent Agenda will be considered in one motion and the Request to Speak card should be turned in prior to the first item on Consent.
1 PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION HONORING NOVEMBER 11, 2023 AS VETERANS DAY Objective: The objective of this report is to provide information needed to formally recognize the sacrifices our veterans have made and honor and celebrate Veterans Day 2023.

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt a proclamation recognizing November 11, 2023 as Veterans Day.

CONSENT AGENDA

4. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-84 AMENDING THE CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET AND APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH PSOMAS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE 6TH STREET & CUMMINS WAY TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT (CIP 12023)
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to adopt Resolution 23-84 amending the Capital Improvement Program budget and to approve of a professional services contract with Psomas for a Feasibility Study and Engineering Design for the 6th Street & Cummins Way Traffic Safety Project (CIP 12023).

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: 1) Find that approval of a professional services contract with PSOMAS is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment pursuant to CEQA guidelines section 15060(c) and 15378(a); 2) Adopt Resolution 23-84 amending the Capital Improvement Program budget; 3) Approve a professional services contract for engineering services with Psomas for a Feasibility Study and Engineering Design for traffic calming measures for the 6th Street & Cummins Way Traffic Safety Project (CIP 12023); 4) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a professional services contract with Psomas for an amount not to exceed $99,930; 5) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the professional services contract, with approval from the City Attorney; 6) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments up to 15% ($15,000) of the total contract amount; and 7) Delegate authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to extend the term of the contract, if necessary.

5. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 23-9 AMENDING TITLE 10 (VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE REESTABLISHMENT OF SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (CIP 12019)
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to consider the approval of proposed amendments to Title 10 of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento. 2 Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance 23-9, amending Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento.

6. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT 8 FOR THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH WOOD RODGERS, INC. FOR THE RIVERFRONT STREET EXTENSION AND 5TH STREET WIDENING PROJECT (CIP 15032)
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to approve Amendment 8 of the professional services contract with Wood Rodgers, Inc. for design and engineering support services through the construction phase of the Riverfront Street Extension and 5th Street Widening Project (CIP 15032).

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: (1) Approve Amendment 8 of the contract for professional services with Wood Rodgers, Inc. to extend the term of the contract until June 30, 2024; (2) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment 8 with Wood Rodgers, Inc.; (3) Authorize the City Manager to execute nonsubstantive changes or modifications, with approval from the City Attorney; and (4) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute amendments to further extend the term of the contract, if necessary.

7. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 WITH GHD, INC. FOR THE

SACRAMENTO AVENUE COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP 10048) FOR AWARD OF GREEN MEANS GO GRANT
Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to approve Contract Amendment No. 1 to the professional services contract with GHD, Inc. for the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan (CIP 10048).

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council: 1) Approve and authorize the City Manager, or their designee, to execute Contract Amendment No. 1 to the professional services contract with GHD, Inc.; and 2) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the contract with GHD, Inc. with approval from the City Attorney.

8. Economic Development & Housing
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-81 AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S ACCEPTANCE OF A PUBLIC USE PROPERTY TRANSFER LOCATED AT 450 LIGHTHOUSE DRIVE (APN 010-523- 038) FROM THE WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY Objective: The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to adopt Resolution 23-81 (Attachment 1) delegating authority to the City Manager to accept a public use property transfer located at 450 Lighthouse Drive (APN 010-523-038) previously dedicated to 3 the City by the Oversight Board of the West Sacramento Redevelopment Successor Agency (“Successor Agency”).

Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 23-81 authorizing the acceptance of the public use property transfer located at 450 Lighthouse Drive (APN 010-523-038) from the Successor Agency.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE

REGULAR AGENDA
NONE
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART II

9. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS
Bikeshare Policy Steering Committee --------------------------------------------Guerrero, Alternate - Early City/County 2x2 ----------------------------------------------------Guerrero/Orozco, Alternate – Sulpizio Hull City/School 2x2 ------------------------------------------------------Guerrero/Sulpizio Hull, Alternate - Alcala Executive Commission to Address Homelessness --------------------Sulpizio Hull, Alternate - Orozco EIFD Public Financing Authority----------------------------------------------------Vacant, Alternate - Vacant League of California Cities --------------------------------------------------- Alcala, Alternate – Sulpizio Hull Local Agency Formation Commission ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Alcala Port District Commission ---------------------------------------------------------Guerrero, Early, Sulpizio Hull Remote Access Network ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Guerrero River City Regional Stadium Financing Authority------------------------------------------Guerrero, Orozco Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) ------------------------Guerrero; Alternate - Early Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District Board --------------Orozco; Alternate - Sulpizio Hull West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency JPA ----------------------------Alcala; Alternate - Orozco Yolo Animal Servies Planning Agency JPA-------------------------------------------------------------Guerrero Yolo County Housing Authority-------------------------------------------------Early, Alternate - Sulpizio Hull Yolo Transportation District -----------------------------------------------------Early, Alternate - Sulpizio Hull Yolo Habitat Conservancy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sulpizio Hull Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District ----------------------------Alcala; Alternate – Sulpizio Hull Yolo Subbasin Sustainable Groundwater Agency-------------------------Sulpizio Hull; Alternate - Early

COUNCIL INTERMEDIARY REPRESENTATIVES
Delta Protection Commission -------------------------------------------------------Vacant; Alternate - Vacant New Hope Community Development Corporation---------------------------------Early; Alternate - Alcala Yolo County Consolidated Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board--------Sulpizio Hull

10. COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS, REAPPOINTMENTS, REMOVALS TO/FROM CITY AND NONCITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

11. PART II
A. Council Calendar
4 B. City Manager Report
C. City Attorney Report
D. Staff Direction from City Council Members
E. Future Agenda Item Requests by Council
F. Adjourn
I, Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk, declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the November 1, 2023 regular and closed session meetings of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency and Financing Authority was posted October 27, 2023 at the rear entrance at City Hall, 1110 West Capitol Avenue, West Sacramento, CA and was available for public review.

NOTE: If you challenge the nature of a proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.

The agenda and agenda reports are also available on the City’s website at www.cityofwestsacramento.org City Council meetings are broadcast live on Wave Cable Channel 20 and rerun the next day at 12:00 PM and the following Saturday at 6:00 PM.

All public materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are also made available for public inspection on the City’s website at:
www.cityofwestsacramento.org. Any document provided at the meeting by staff or by the public will be provided by the City Clerk upon request by phone at (916) 617-4500, or by email at: [email protected].

If you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 916-617- 4500 or [email protected]. Notify the City Clerk’s Office at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting. Assisted listening devices are available at this meeting. 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 1, 2023 ITEM # 2
SUBJECT:

PRESENTATION OF THE 2023 HELEN PUTNAM AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE IN CITYBUSINESS RELATIONS FOR WEST SACRAMENTO HOME RUN PAID INTERNSHIP

PROGRAM
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Justine Jimenez, Home Run Business Manager
City Manager’s Office
ATTACHMENT [ ] Yes [X] No [X] Information [ ] Direction [ ] Action

OBJECTIVE
To receive the 2023 Helen Putnam Award for Excellence in City-Business Relations for the West Sacramento Home Run Paid Internship Program from the League of California Cities.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully requests City Council receive the presentation of the 2023 Helen Putnam Award for Excellence in City-Business Relations for the West Sacramento Home Run Paid Internship Program from the League of California Cities.

BACKGROUND
The West Sacramento Home Run strives to create a community where every child and young person is supported in their development and has opportunities for health, social emotional support, and quality education to prepare them for their future and career. The West Sacramento Home Run Paid Internship Program partners with our West Sacramento Chamber of Commerce and provides high school students from Washington Unified High Schools the ability to participate in paid internships with local employers along with training and preparation for future careers. Launched as a pilot program in 2028, and fully realized in summer of 2019, the Paid Internship Program was recognized by the League of California Cities and awarded the Helen Putnam Award of Excellence in City-Business Relations at their Fall 2023 Conference and Expo. The Home Run designed and staffed a booth at the Expo and is delighted to have received this meritorious honor for one of the Home Run programs.

ANALYSIS
The West Sacramento Home Run’s mission is to make West Sacramento the best place to grow up, raise a family and find talent. None of the programs and the benefit they give to our children youth and families would be possible without the excellent groundwork laid, and the ongoing support of the West Sacramento City Council.

Receiving this award is not only the result of that support, and the hard work done by the Home Run staff but also our strong partnership with our Chamber of Commerce, local businesses and community organizations, and the Washington Unified School District.

Environmental Considerations
This presentation of award is not subject to CEQA because it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21065; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15060(c), 15378(a).)
Commission Recommendation
Not applicable
Strategic Plan Integration
In the area of Management for the 2023 Strategic Plan this presentation of award directly reflects the priority of Home Run Enrollment Growth, especially as the Home Run Paid Internship enrollment increased by 64% between summer of 2022 and summer of 2023.

Alternatives
Not applicable
Coordination and Review
West Sacramento Home Run coordinated this presentation of award with members of the League of California Cities.
6 2023 Helen Putnam Award for Excellence in City-Business Relations November 1, 2023

Budget/Cost Impact
There is no cost for this presentation of award, therefore there is no budget impact, other than the hope that recognition of the Home Run for this program may lead to future funding.

ATTACHMENT
None
7 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 1, 2023 ITEM # 3
SUBJECT:

PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION HONORING
NOVEMBER 11, 2023 AS VETERANS DAY
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Meaghan Stiles, Program Manager
City Manager’s Office
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide information needed to formally recognize the sacrifices our veterans have made and honor and celebrate Veterans Day 2023.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt a proclamation recognizing November 11, 2023 as Veterans Day.

BACKGROUND
Veterans Day is a day to reflect upon the heroism and to honor American who have served in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, and Coast Guard. Veterans Day was originally called Armistice Day, a day that commemorated the original declaration of peace that took effect on the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month of 1918. In 1954, the name of the holiday was amended to “Veterans Day” to remember all veterans in all wars and to celebrate, honor, and pay due respect to all of America’s veterans for their patriotism, love of country, and willingness to serve and sacrifice for our freedom.

The theme for Veterans Day 2023 is “Service.” Veterans are proud of their military service in defending our Nation. Honor reflects the military value and tradition of answering the call to duty. There is distinct honor in serving to protect our way of life and the Constitution of the United States of America.

VFW Post 8762 has been providing services to West Sacramento Veterans since their charter began in 1946.

Post 8762 has also donated over $750,000 to the West Sacramento and surrounding communities through charitable groups, given awards to high school students for essays on democracy, awarded scholarships to nurses at Veterans Hospitals to further their training, and contributed to youth soccer, swimming, baseball and basketball programs. Post 8762 has also sponsored the Boys and Girls Scouts, Sea Scouts, and the local Jr.

ROTC Program.

The West Sacramento Veterans Day parade will be held on November 11th, 2023, and the City of West Sacramento, with Council support, will be co-sponsoring the event. The parade runs through the State Streets and annually has over 400 community leaders and members in attendance.

ANALYSIS
Veterans Day is an important time to recognize those who have served in this country’s armed forces. It is an opportunity to thank those who were willing to put their lives on the line to protect our country. While not all may have faced war time or been actively deployed, they were willing to. It is important to honor their time away from family, friends and the life altering experiences they have faced.

Environmental Considerations
N/A
Commission Recommendation
N/A
Strategic Plan Integration
N/A
Alternatives
N/A
8 Proclamation Veterans Day 2023
November 1, 2023

Coordination and Review
N/A
Budget/Cost Impact
N/A

ATTACHMENT

1. Proclamation
9 PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO HONORING NOVEMBER 11, 2023 AS VETERANS DAY
WHEREAS, America's veterans have fought to defend our country, its values, and its interests since the first days of our founding. They have defeated tyrants, eliminated terrorists, and secured freedom at home and abroad, and WHEREAS, veterans of our Armed Forces selflessly fought to earn and to protect our democratic freedoms as citizens of the United States, and WHEREAS, these Soldiers, Sailors, Air(wo)men, Marines, and Coast Guards(wo)men selflessly placed lives, wellbeing, and security of others before their own. We enjoy the privileges of peace, prosperity, and freedom because of our veterans, and WHEREAS, our community owes a debt of gratitude to our veterans that can never fully be repaid, and
WHEREAS, the scars of military service and warfare linger long after the battlefield and their courage and fortitude in the face of adversity serve as an example for all Americans, and
WHEREAS, for their love of their country and dedication to duty, America's veterans have endured adversity, loneliness, fatigue, loss, and made other incredible sacrifices, and WHEREAS, on Veterans Day, we pause to pay tribute to all who have proudly worn our Nation's uniform, and
WHEREAS, the 2023 theme of “service” highlights the distinct honor it is to serve and protect our way of life and the Constitution of the United States of America; and WHEREAS, in West Sacramento, the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) Post 8762 strives to foster camaraderie among United States veterans of overseas conflict and to advocate on behalf of all veterans, and
WHEREAS, the vision of VFW Post 8762 is to ensure that veterans are recognized for the sacrifices they and their loved ones have made on behalf of this great country, and WHEREAS, VFW Post 8762 has been a part of the West Sacramento community for 76 years, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of West Sacramento expresses both their gratitude for VFW Post 8762 and their support for the 2023 West Sacramento Veterans Day Parade and urges all members of the community to join in observance of this holiday and to honor its veterans.

PROCLAIMED this 1st day of November 2023.

ATTEST:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
10 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 1, 2023 ITEM # 4
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-84 AMENDING THE CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET AND APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH PSOMAS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE 6TH STREET & CUMMINS WAY TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT (CIP 12023) INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Christian Asuncion, Associate Civil Engineer
Capital Projects Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to adopt Resolution 23-84 amending the Capital Improvement Program budget and to approve of a professional services contract with Psomas for a Feasibility Study and Engineering Design for the 6th Street & Cummins Way Traffic Safety Project (CIP 12023).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1) Find that approval of a professional services contract with Psomas is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c) and 15378(a);
2) Adopt Resolution 23-84 amending the Capital Improvement Program budget; 3) Approve a professional services contract for engineering services with Psomas for a Feasibility Study and Engineering Design for traffic calming measures for the 6th Street & Cummins Way Traffic Safety Project (CIP 12023);
4) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a professional services contract with Psomas for an amount not to exceed $99,930;
5) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the professional services contract, with approval from the City Attorney; 6) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments up to 15% ($15,000) of the total contract amount; and
7) Delegate authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to extend the term of the contract, if necessary.

BACKGROUND
Located within the Broderick community of West Sacramento, the intersection of 6th Street and Cummins Way has experienced multiple instances of vehicles exceeding the posted speed limit along Cummins Way and crashing into properties located in or near that intersection. Because of the crashes and the response to the City from the affected properties, City staff has engaged with the neighborhood to assess the implementation of traffic calming measures. As a result, the City implemented preliminary measures including the installation of all-way stop signs, speed feedback signs, and advance warning signs at the intersection. Additional shoulder striping will be done on Cummins Way between 8th Street and 6th Street.

One residential property has been crashed into multiple times by vehicles. That property owner had requested that the City take measures to protect their home. On May 19, 2023, the City entered into an agreement with the property owner to reimburse them for the construction of landscaping or other physical barriers to prevent and mitigate future damage.

On May 17, 2023, City Council adopted Resolution 23-44 amending the Capital Improvement Program to add the 6th Street & Cummins Way Traffic Safety Project (CIP 12023) to further evaluate the intersection and develop a comprehensive strategy to address this ongoing issue.

ANALYSIS
On July 28, 2023, Staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) through the City’s online procurement system, OpenGov (formerly ProcureNow), to obtain proposals from engineering firms to conduct technical studies and 11 6
th Street & Cummins Way Feasibility Study & Design Contract November 1, 2023

feasibility studies for implementing additional traffic calming and mitigation strategies for the intersection. The City received (3) proposals from the following firms, listed in alphabetical order:

1. Kimley-Horn

2. Psomas

3. Wood Rodgers, Inc.

The proposals were evaluated by a (3) person panel of City staff consistent with the City’s purchasing policy.

Proposals were evaluated based on qualifications, proven ability, experience, and technical approach. After reviewing Psomas’s qualifications, experience, and proposed work plan, the staff selection panel determined that Psomas has a strong understanding of the work to be performed and is the most qualified firm. The attached contract includes the negotiated scope and fees to complete the assignment.

Environmental Considerations
The current action is not subject to CEQA because it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21065; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15060(c), 15378(a).)
Commission Recommendation
Not Applicable.

Strategic Plan Integration
Not Applicable
Alternatives
The City Council may choose among the following alternatives:
1) Approve the recommended actions as stated above.
2) Amend the recommended actions.
3) Decline to approve the recommended actions or cancel the project.

The City has prioritized this project and should move forward to identify solutions for the traffic safety issue at the intersection of 6th Street and Cummins Way. Alternatives 2 and 3 are not recommended because they would delay the project.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Capital Projects Department in coordination with and review by the Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
This project is included in the City’s current Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as CIP 12023 – 6th St & Cummins Way Traffic Safety Project with an original budget of $125,000. Additional funds are requested for this CIP to fully fund the initial design, feasibility study, technical study and reimbursement to the property owner for this project. Table 1 provides a breakdown of the current expenses and anticipated costs for this initial phase of design. Table 2 provides the current funding revenue and sources for the project with the requested funding to complete initial design and shows that additional funds of $71,364 are needed to complete this phase of the project. Staff recommends the use of Measure E (Road Rehabilitation) funds for the needed funds.

Table 1: Funding Breakdown of current and anticipated project expenses.

Project Costs
Management and Engineering (Expended) Approval
Contracts &
Amendments
City Staff & Misc. $ 1,748
Phase 1 Improvements (Stop Signs/Warning Signs/Striping) $ 9,700 Design Phase (Encumbered)
Consultant - PSOMAS Pending $ 99,930
Consultant - PSOMAS (15% Contingency) Pending $ 15,000
City Staff (Project Management and Engineering) Pending $ 19,986 12 6
th Street & Cummins Way Feasibility Study & Design Contract November 1, 2023

Property Reimbursement Pending $ 50,000
Total Project Costs to Date $ 196,364
Table 2: Funding revenue and sources with requested funding to complete initial design.

City Funds Fund Totals
Fund 400 (12023) – Originally from Fund 110 (Measure E) $ 125,000 City Funds $ 125,000
TOTAL APPROPRIATED FUNDS $ 125,000
Funds Needed (Measure E) $ 71,364
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDS FOR TRAFFIC FEASIBILITY STUDY $ 196,364

ATTACHMENTS
1) Resolution 23-84
2) Psomas Contract
13 Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 23-84

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR THE 6TH STREET & CUMMINS WAY TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT (CIP 12023) WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the $125,000 budget for project 12023 in Fiscal Year 2022/23; and
WHEREAS, the intersection of Sixth Street and Cummins Way is located in the Broderick community of West Sacramento; and
WHEREAS, the intersection has had multiple instances of vehicles exceeding the speed limit along Cummins Way and crashing into houses located in or near its intersection with 6th Street; and
WHEREAS, one house located on 6th Street has been crashed into by vehicles multiple times and the property owner has requested the City take measures to protect their home from vehicles exceeding the speed limit along Cummins Way; and WHEREAS, City staff have met with the property owner and various neighbors; and WHEREAS, the City has implemented preliminary traffic calming measures including the installation of additional stop signs, advance warning signs and additional striping; and WHEREAS, the City has selected Psomas to provide professional engineering services for a feasibility study and engineering design of traffic calming measures for the 6th Street and Cummins Way Traffic Safety Project (Project); and WHEREAS, additional funding of $71,364 is necessary to carry out the Project and an amendment is required for the Capital Improvement Program budget for the Project; and WHEREAS, the original funding for the project was transferred from Measure E, Road Rehabilitation funds, and there are sufficient remaining Measure E funds for the additional funding needed for this project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all information related to this matter, as presented at the public meetings of the City Council identified herein, including any supporting reports by City staff, and any other information provided during public meetings.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento as follows:

1. The City Council hereby approves amendments to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the 2023-24 fiscal year as listed below:

SOURCES
$71,364 110-0000-3085 Measure E Fund Balance
$71,364 400-9900-4990/400-12023-4990 Tsfr in from Measure E – Roads $71,364 Total Sources
USES
$71,364 400-9900-5530/400-12023-5800 Project Budget 12023 $71,364 110-9530-5950 Transfer out to Project
$71,364 Total Uses
*Note – Interfund transfers in grey are not included in totals to avoid duplication of costs. 14 Resolution 23-84

2. The City Council hereby finds that the facts set forth in the recitals to this Resolution are true and correct and establish the factual basis for the City Council’s adoption of this Resolution.

3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the West Sacramento City Council this 1st day of November 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
15 CPE23-244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025

CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
THIS CONTRACT is made on November 1, 2023, by and between the CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (“City”), and PSOMAS (“Consultant”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the City desires professional services for the Feasibility Study and Engineering Design for the 6th & Cummins Intersection Improvements; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has presented a proposal for such services to the City, dated August 25, 2023, (attached hereto as Exhibit “A”) and is duly licensed, qualified and experienced to perform those services;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES:

A. Consultant shall do all work, attend all meetings, produce all reports and carry out all activities necessary to completion of the services described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit “A”. This Contract and its exhibits shall be known as the “Contract Documents.” Terms set forth in any Contract Document shall be deemed to be incorporated in all Contract Documents as if set forth in full therein. In the event of conflict between terms contained in these Contract Documents, the more specific term shall control. If any portion of the Contract Documents shall be in conflict with any other portion, provisions contained in the Contract shall govern over conflicting provisions contained in the exhibits to the Contract.

B. Consultant enters into this Contract as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City. The Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Contract to bind the City in any respect. Nothing in this Contract shall be construed to be inconsistent with this relationship or status. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by the Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of the Consultant and not of the City. The City shall not be obligated in any way to pay any wage claims or other claims made against Consultant by any such employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, or any other person resulting from performance of this Contract.

C. The Consultant agrees it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

2. TERM OF CONTRACT
A. The services of Consultant are to commence upon receipt of written notice to proceed from the City, and shall be undertaken and completed in accordance with the Schedule of Performance attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit “B” and shall terminate on December 31, 2025.

Attachment 2
16 CPE23-244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025
B. Consultant’s failure to complete work in accordance with the Schedule of Performance may result in delayed compensation as described in Section 3.

C. The City Manager or his or her designee may, by written instrument signed by the Parties, extend the duration of this Contract for two additional 1-year terms in the manner provided in Section 5, provided that the extension does not require the payment of compensation in excess of the maximum compensation set forth in Section 3, Compensation.

3. COMPENSATION:

A. The Consultant shall be paid monthly for the actual fees, costs and expenses for all time and materials required and expended, but in no event shall total compensation exceed ninety nine thousand, nine hundred thirty ($99,930.00), without City’s prior written approval.

Consultant's fees shall be as specified in the Schedule of Fees, which is attached hereto an incorporated herein as Exhibit "C".

B. Said amount shall be paid upon submittal of a monthly billing showing completion of the tasks that month. Consultant shall furnish City with invoices for all expenses as well as for all materials authorized by this Contract. The invoices shall be submitted with the monthly billings.

If Consultant’s performance is not in conformity with the Schedule of Performance, payments may be delayed or denied, unless the Consultant’s failure to perform in conformity with the Schedule of Performance is a documented result of the City’s failure to conform with the Schedule of Performance, or if the Schedule of Performance is extended pursuant to Section 5.

C. If the work is halted at the request of the City, compensation shall be based upon the proportion that the work performed bears to the total work required by this Contract, subject to Section 4.

4. TERMINATION:

A. This Contract may be terminated by either party, provided that the other party is given not less than 30 calendar days’ written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate.

B. The City may temporarily suspend this Contract, at no additional cost to City, provided that the Consultant is given written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of temporary suspension. If City gives such notice of temporary suspension, Consultant shall immediately suspend its activities under this Contract.

C. Notwithstanding any provisions of this Contract, Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this Contract by Consultant, and the City may withhold any payments due to Consultant until such time as the exact amount of damages, if any, due the City from Consultant is determined.

D. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be compensated as provided for in this Contract, except as provided in Section 4C. Upon termination, the City shall be entitled to all work, including but not limited to, appraisals, inventories, studies, analyses, drawings and data estimates performed to that date in accordance with Section 7 hereof. 17 CPE23-244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025

5. AMENDMENTS, CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS:

Amendments, changes or modifications in the terms of this Contract may be made at any time by mutual written agreement between the parties hereto and shall be signed by the persons authorized to bind the parties hereto.

6. EXTENSIONS OF TIME:

Consultant may, for good cause, request extensions of time to perform the services required hereunder. Such extensions shall be authorized in advance by the City in writing and shall be incorporated in written amendments to this Contract or the attached Work Program in the manner provided in Section 5.

7. PROPERTY OF CITY:

A. It is mutually agreed that all materials prepared by the Consultant under this Contract shall become the property of the City, and the Consultant shall have no property right therein whatsoever. Immediately upon termination, the City shall be entitled to, and the Consultant shall deliver to the City, all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and other such materials as may have been prepared or accumulated to date by the Consultant in performing this Contract which is not Consultant’s privileged information, as defined by law, or Consultant’s personnel information, along with all other property belonging exclusively to the City which is in the Consultant’s possession.

B. Additionally, it is agreed that the parties intend this to be a contract for services and each considers the products and results of the services to be rendered by Consultant hereunder (the “Work”) to be a work made for hire. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that the Work (and all rights therein, including, without limitation, copyright) belongs to and shall be the sole and exclusive property of the City. The reuse of any of the materials or documents described in Paragraph 7.A by the City on any other project without the written permission of the Consultant, shall be at the City's sole risk and the City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Consultant from all claims, damages and expenses, including attorney's fees, arising out of such unauthorized reuse by the City or by others acting through the City. The Consultant is not responsible and liability is waived by the City as against the Consultant for use by the City or any other person of any data, reports, plans or drawings not signed by the Consultant.

8. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS:

A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of federal, State and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Contract. It shall be City’s responsibility to obtain all rights of way and easements to enable Consultant to perform its services hereunder.

Consultant shall assist City in providing the same.

B. Consultant warrants to the City that it is licensed by all applicable governmental bodies to perform this Contract and will remain so licensed throughout the progress of the Work, and that it has, and will have, throughout the progress of the Work, the necessary experience, skill and financial resources to enable it to perform this Contract. 18 CPE23-244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025
C. The work contemplated under this Contract is a public work for the purposes of Labor Code section 1720, and is subject to the payment of prevailing wages. Accordingly, Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Exhibit “E”.

9. WARRANTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES - CONSULTANT:

A. Consultant agrees and represents that it is qualified to properly provide the services set forth in Exhibit “A” in a manner which is consistent with the generally accepted standards of Consultant’s profession.

B. Consultant agrees and represents that the work performed under this Contract shall be in accordance with applicable federal, State and local law in accordance with Section 17A hereof.

C. Consultant shall designate a project manager who at all times shall represent the Consultant before the City on all matters relating to this Contract. The project manager shall continue in such capacity unless and until he or she is removed at the request of the City, is no longer employed by Consultant, or is replaced with the written approval of the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.

D. Consultant shall provide corrective services without charge to the City for services which fail to meet the above professional and legal standards and which are reported to Consultant in writing within sixty (60) days of discovery. Should Consultant fail or refuse to perform promptly its obligations, the City may render or undertake performance thereof and the Consultant shall be liable for any expenses thereby incurred.

10. SUBCONTRACTING:

None of the services covered by this Contract shall be subcontracted without the prior written consent of the City, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Consultant shall be as fully responsible to the City for the negligent acts and omissions of its contractors and subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as it is for the negligent acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Consultant.

11. ASSIGNABILITY:

Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Contract whether by assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of the City which will not be unreasonably withheld.

However, claims for money due or to become due Consultant from the City under this Contract may be assigned to a financial institution, or to a trustee in bankruptcy, without such approval.

Notice of any assignment or transfer whether voluntary or involuntary shall be furnished promptly to the City.

12. INTEREST IN CONTRACT:

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any of its employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the subject of the Contract, nor any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the 19 CPE23-244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025
performance of its services hereunder. Consultant shall make all disclosures required by the City’s conflict of interest code in accordance with the category designated by the City, unless the City Manager determines in writing that Consultant’s duties are more limited in scope than is warranted by the category designated by the City code and that a narrower disclosure category should apply. Consultant also agrees to make disclosure in compliance with the City conflict of interest code if, at any time after the execution of this Contract, City determines and notifies Consultant in writing that Consultant’s duties under this Contract warrant greater disclosure by Consultant than was originally contemplated. Consultant shall make disclosures in the time, place and manner set forth in the conflict of interest code and as directed by the City.

13. MATERIALS CONFIDENTIAL:

All of the materials prepared or assembled by Consultant pursuant to performance of this Contract are confidential and Consultant agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City, except by court order.

14. LIABILITY OF CONSULTANT-NEGLIGENCE:

Consultant shall be responsible for performing the work under this Contract in a manner which is consistent with the generally-accepted standards of the Consultant’s profession and shall be liable for its own negligence and the negligent acts of its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors. The City shall have no right of control over the manner in which the work is to be done but only as to its outcome, and shall not be charged with the responsibility of preventing risk to Consultant or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors.

15. INDEMNITY AND LITIGATION COSTS:

Consultant shall protect, hold free and harmless, defend and indemnify the City, its consultants, and each of their officers, employees and agents, from any and all liability, penalties, costs, losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims or judgments, including attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its employees or anyone else employed by the Consultant in the performance of professional design services under this agreement, to the extent of the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

To the extent permitted by Civil Code section 2782.8, for all other claims unrelated to the provision of professional design services, the Consultant shall protect, hold free and harmless, defend and indemnify the City, its consultants, and each of their officers, employees and agents, from any and all liability, penalties, costs, losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims or judgments, including attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation, which arise out of or are in any way connected with the Consultant’s, or its subcontractors’ or suppliers’, performance under this agreement or failure to comply with any of the obligations contained in the agreement. This indemnity shall imply no reciprocal right of the Consultant in any action on the agreement pursuant to California Civil Code section 1717 or section 1717.5. To the fullest extent legally permissible, this indemnity, defense and hold harmless agreement by the Consultant shall apply to any and all acts or omissions unrelated to the provision of professional design services, whether active or passive, on the part of the Consultant or its agents, employees, representatives, or subcontractor’s agents, employees and representatives, resulting in claim or liability, irrespective of whether or not any acts or omissions of the parties to be indemnified hereunder may also have 20 CPE23-244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025
been a contributing factor to the liability, except such loss or damage which was caused by the active negligence, the sole negligence, or the willful misconduct of the City.

16. CONSULTANT TO PROVIDE INSURANCE:

A. Consultant shall not commence any work before obtaining, and shall maintain in force at all times during the duration and performance of this Contract, the policies of insurance specified in this Section. Such insurance must have the approval of the City as to limit, form, and amount, and shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A VII (an NR rating is acceptable for Worker’s Compensation insurance written with the State Compensation Insurance Fund of California).

B. Prior to execution of this Contract and prior to commencement of any work, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and copies of endorsements providing evidence of coverage for all policies required by the Contract. The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall, at their expense, maintain in effect at all times during the performance of work under the Contract not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policy satisfactory to the City. The maintenance by Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors of the following coverage and limits of insurance is a material element of this Contract. The failure of Consultant or of any of its contractors or subcontractors to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of this Contract. Approval of the insurance by the City shall not relieve or decrease any liability of Consultant.

1. Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance

a. Worker’s Compensation - Insurance to protect the Consultant, its contractors and subcontractors from all claims under Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Acts, including Longshoremen’s and Harbor Worker’s Act (“Acts”), if applicable. Such coverage shall be maintained, in type and amount, in strict compliance with all applicable state and Federal statutes and regulations.

The Consultant shall execute a certificate in compliance with Labor Code Section 1861, on the form provided in the Contract Documents.
b. Consultant shall provide a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant.

2. Commercial General Liability Insurance
a. The insurance shall be provided on form CG0001, or its equivalent, and shall include coverage for claims for bodily injury or property damage arising out of premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual liability, and subconsultant’s work and personal and advertising injury resulting from actions, failures to act, or operations of the insured, or by its employees or agents, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the insured. The amount of insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general and products/completed operations aggregates. 21 CPE23-244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025
b. The commercial general liability insurance shall also include the following:
i. Endorsement equivalent to CG 2010 0714 naming the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds. The endorsement shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
ii. Endorsement stating insurance provided to the City shall be primary as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it, to the payment or satisfaction of any defense expenses, loss, or judgment.
iii. Provision or endorsement stating that the Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

3. Commercial Automobile Insurance
a. The insurance shall include, but shall not be limited to, coverage for claims for bodily injury or property damage for owned, non-owned, and hired automobiles resulting from actions, failures to act, or operations of the insured, or by its employees or agents, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the insured. The amount of insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per accident.
b. The commercial automobile insurance shall include the same endorsements required for the commercial general liability policy (see Section

16.B.2.b).

4. Professional Liability. The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall secure and maintain in full force, during the term of this Contract and for five years thereafter, professional liability insurance policies appropriate to the respective professions and the work to be performed as specified in this Contract. The limits of such professional liability insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per claim.

C. In addition to any other remedy the City may have, if Consultant fails to maintain the insurance coverage as required in this Section, the City may obtain such insurance coverage as is not being maintained, in form and amount substantially the same as is required herein, and the City may deduct the cost of such insurance from any amounts due or which may become due Consultant under this Contract.
22 CPE23-244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025
D. No policy required by this Contract shall be suspended, cancelled, terminated by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits unless Consultant has provided thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City.

E. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions in excess of $10,000 must be declared to, and approved by, the City.

F. The requirement as to types, limits, and the City’s approval of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant are not intended to, and shall not in any manner, limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations assumed by Consultant under the Contract.

17. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS:

A. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of, shall observe and comply with, and shall cause any and all persons, firms or corporations employed by it or under its control to observe and comply with, applicable federal, state, county and municipal laws, ordinances, regulations, orders and decrees which in any manner affect those engaged or employed on the work described by this Contract or the materials used or which in any way affect the conduct of the work.

B. Consultant shall not engage in unlawful employment discrimination. Such unlawful employment discrimination includes, but is not limited to, employment discrimination based upon a person’s race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, gender, citizenship, or sexual orientation.

C. Consultant shall maintain and make available for inspection by the City and its auditors accurate records of all of its costs, disbursements and receipts with respect to any work under this Contract. Such inspections may be made during regular office hours at any time until six (6) months after the final payments under this Contract are made to the Consultant.

D. This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relative to the services specified herein and no modification hereof shall be effective unless and until such modification is evidenced by a writing signed by both parties to this Contract. There are no understandings, agreements, conditions, representations, warranties or promises, with respect to this Contract, except those contained in or referred to in the writing.

E. All notices that are required to be given by one party to the other under this Contract shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if delivered personally or enclosed in a properly addressed envelope and deposited in a United States Post Office for delivery by registered or certified mail addressed to the parties at the following addresses:

City: Christian Asuncion
City of West Sacramento
1110 West Capitol Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Email: [email protected]
23 CPE23-244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025
Consultant: Paul Gervacio
Psomas
1075 Creekside Ridge Drive Suite 200
Roseville, CA 95678
Email: [email protected]
F. This Contract shall be interpreted and governed by the laws of the State of California.

G. Any action arising out of this Contract shall be brought and maintained in Yolo County California, regardless of where else venue may lie.

H. In any action brought by either party to enforce the terms of this Contract, each party shall be bear responsibility for its attorney’s fees and all costs regardless of whether one party is determined to be the prevailing party.
[Signatures on following page]
24 CPE23-244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
By: __________________________
Aaron Laurel, City Manager
ATTEST:

By: _________________________________
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: __________________________________
Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney

CONSULTANT
By: _________________________
Paul Gervacio, Vice President –
Senior Project Manager

25 CPE23-244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025

EXHIBIT A
Consultant Proposal/Scope of Work
26 Balancing the Natural and Built Environment
3550 Watt Avenue
Suite 140
Sacramento, CA 95821
Tel 916.979.7640
www.Psomas.com
August 25, 2023
Ryan Teves, Senior Engineer
City of West Sacramento
Capital Projects, Engineering
1110 West Capitol Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Subject: Feasibility Study and Engineering Design for the 6th & Cummins Intersection Improvements Dear Mr. Teves:

For more than 25 years, Psomas has been working with the City of West Sacramento (City), providing engineering, surveying, and construction management services on many transportation, water, sewer, and development projects as the City has grown into a thriving, proud, and diverse community. We will continue to provide the same expert staff you have come to expect, bringing innovative and sustainable solutions to engineering challenges in the most economical fashion possible.

Project Understanding: As a resident of West Sacramento, I understand the tremendous growth and accomplishments we have amassed since the City’s incorporation in 1987. I am also proud of how the City has continued to strive to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. Over the years, living in West Sacramento and having attended numerous sporting events for my daughter at the nearby Bryte Park, I am familiar with the Bryte and Broderick area, and I am familiar with the concern of vehicles speeding through neighborhoods. Everyone deserves to feel safe in their own home, and no one should go through what Mike, Sarah Cassidy, and Damian Ladd experienced in May 2021 and again in April 2022.

Having also worked my entire 24-year career in local transportation projects for public agencies, I understand the aspects of roadway design and the impacts of roadway elements when designing roadway improvements. Safety, liability, precedence, cost, maintenance, design standards, and impacts on traffic operations are all things that need to be considered before implementation, and our team is ready to represent the City and provide a balanced and efficient approach that will evaluate potential mitigation measures. We understand that “nothing is off the table,” so we will keep an open mind to what may help improve the situation.

Team Approach: We have developed an approach, detailed in our proposal, to address the key challenges and opportunities based on our experience working on similar projects. Our relevant experience includes understanding collision and traffic analysis is significantly improved after collecting data to determine what vehicle volumes, speeds, and collisions have occurred to better determine what trends we see so that focused mitigation measures can best be suggested and analyzed for performance. These initial steps will build the backbone for our traffic calming feasibility study, where we will analyze current proposed mitigation measures and also introduce new measures such as full street width speed humps or hammerhead cul-de-sacs. These mitigation measures, along with others we describe on page 25 and shown on our conceptual exhibit, will be evaluated to prioritize the improvements in a cost-effective manner and efficiently implement them in potential phases to achieve the desired traffic calming effect.

These traffic calming measures will be discussed openly with the public to gain feedback and support so that a cohesive effort can be made for a project that improves the neighborhood for all stakeholders. To achieve this goal in the most time and cost-efficient manner, our proactive coordination efforts will help guide the project and anticipate the type of involvement, exhibits, and concerns stakeholders will have so that the project team is always prepared to have thorough discussions with the City, 27 residents, Council Members Orozco and Alcala, Mayor Guerrero, West Sacramento Fire Department, Washington Unified School District, Yolobus /Yolo County Transportation District and even bicycle advocacy groups like Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates (SABA). Mike Dour/Psomas has also already considered some potential funding sources to help pay for increased project costs if funding becomes an issue, such as the SACOG Regional Program for the Maintenance & Modernization category.

Team Strength and Experience: The Psomas team has experience working on similar projects dealing with the same type of challenges and opportunities, such as the North 12th Complete Street and West El Camino Rehabilitation project for the City of Sacramento and the Rod Beaudry-Routier Bikeway project for the City of Rancho Cordova and the South Galt Safe Routes to School and Road Rehabilitation project for the City of Galt. Key staff for our team includes Project Manager Paul Gervacio, Principal-in-Charge Tim Hayes, Traffic Calming/Planning Lead and Public/Stakeholder Outreach Lead Alison Mills and Sara Rauwolf (Toole Design Group), Traffic Analysis/Traffic Signal Design Lead Alejandro Angel, and Preliminary Engineering/Final Design Lead Chris Brazil. Depending on the extent of the proposed improvements to advance to the final design, we can also pull in additional teaming partners to fulfill other project needs, such as geotechnical studies, right-of-way acquisition, or even additional surveying/right-of-way Engineering.

Our depth of resources can provide the City with the services needed to complete the project regardless of how small or large the project improvements end up being.

A. Proposer’s Name and Contact
Paul Gervacio, PE, ENV SP
PSOMAS
3550 Watt Avenue, Suite 140, Sacramento, CA 95821 | Ph: 916.788.4877 | Email: [email protected] B. Statement of Offer
This Proposal is an offer to complete the Scope of Work requested. This Proposal, including the Cost Proposal rates provided, will remain valid for at least ninety (90) business days after the Proposal due date.

C. Conflict of Interest
Psomas has no conflicts of interest, nor do we anticipate any in the future, in providing consulting services to the City of West Sacramento. We have no current clients with a financial interest in the outcome of this contract or the City’s construction projects that may follow. We have no financial interest or relationship with any construction company that might submit a bid to the City on construction projects.

D. City Contract Terms
The City of West Sacramento’s Standard Contract and Insurance Requirements have been reviewed and accepted without reservation or qualification, and I, Paul Gervacio, am authorized to sign said contract as a representative of Psomas.

We acknowledge receipt of Addendums #1, dated August 2, 2023.

E. Subcontractors
Toole Design Group, a valued partner of ours on Sacramento region projects, will support our team with Traffic Calming/ Planning and Public/Stakeholder Outreach services. Toole Design Group, 1322 Webster Street, Suite 208, Oakland, CA 94612 | Phone: 510.298.0740.

F. Signature and Authority
I, Paul Gervacio, am authorized to sign said contract as a Vice President of Psomas. A copy of our corporate resolution authorizing myself to bind the company follows this letter.

Sincerely,
Paul Gervacio, PE, ENV SP
Vice President/Project Manager
Ryan Teves, Senior Engineer
August 25, 2023

28 iii
Corporate Resolution
iii
29 TECHNICAL PROJECT APPROACH
Section 3.4
To complete the scope of work, we have developed
an approach to address the key challenges and
opportunities based on our experience working on
similar traffic calming projects and after gathering
some initial feedback from residents. The Psomas team
recently addressed similar key challenges below on the
North 12th Complete Street project.

Our approach to addressing each includes evaluating
the following main issues.

Collision Analysis
Understanding the types of collisions that have
occurred along the corridor can help focus
efforts to mitigate future collisions. Although the
Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS)
does not show any collisions along Cummins Way
or 6th Street, we are aware of at least two collisions
occurring on May 2021 and April 2022 both impacting
the home at 17 6th Street. Numerous residents are
concerned about vehicle speeds along Cummins Way
which is why we will collect collision data from the
City of West Sacramento Police Department and other
available sources to get a true account of where and
when incidents occurred and their primary collision
factors. This will allow us to determine if there are
common factors that we can mitigate.

Traffic Analysis
Utilizing existing and new traffic data, to be collected, will help create an understanding the volumes and
speeds of vehicles driving along Cummins Way and
6th Street. This will help confirm which traffic devices and calming measures would be most beneficial for the
area. The need to slow vehicles down will be balanced
with the needs of the community and emergency
personnel so that a balanced approach is taken without
overshadowing one benefit over another.

Traffic Calming Feasibility Study
Consisting mainly as a residential neighborhood,
residents of the Cummins Way and 6th Street project
area agree that speeding vehicles has been an ongoing
issue they would like to see resolved. With Elkhorn
Village Elementary school less than 2,000 feet away
along Cummins Way, vehicle speeds should ideally be
25 mph or less but repeat violators are using Cummins
Way like a major high speed arterial putting kids and
residents at risk. Residents hear cars “racing through
the streets and doing donuts at the intersection”. The
recently installed, motion activated, flashing beacon
signage helps provide better awareness to drivers
during the day and night to slow down and stop at
the T-intersection. This should already be providing
benefits to the area but additional incremental
mitigation will be studied to determine what else
could be done to significantly reduce the likelihood or eliminate collisions and achieve the City’s Vision Zero goal. We understand the solution must still provide
the circulation needs for residents and emergency
vehicles through the area. The project team will rank
and consider potentially phasing the improvements
as a cost-effective way to efficiently implement the
mitigation to achieve the desired traffic calming effect.

Public Outreach
The Broderick neighborhood is in an older part of the
City of West Sacramento that holds a lot of history
for West Sacramento as the area dates back to mid1850’s. Fishing, farming, as well as dairy industries helped shape the early beginnings of West Sacramento
so it’s no surprise when there is an eclectic group
Impact Collision at Home on 6th Street
City of West Sacramento | 6th & Cummins Intersection 24 30 of stakeholders in the Broderick area. Outside the
immediate project area, there is a mix of long time
and newer stakeholders in the Washington area
such as Sal’s Tacos, Lighthouse Market and Deli,
Broderick Roadhouse, Burgers and Brew, California
State Teachers Retirement System and Department
of General Services. 6th Street and Cummins Way
includes a variety of stakeholders such as private
residences, Yolo County Housing Authority, Meals on
Wheels Yolo County, and Elk Horn Village Elementary
School. It is this same diversity that helps create a
proud heritage that is represented by the Broderick
and Bryte Neighborhood Association and Bryte
and Broderick Community Action Network. Our
comprehensive approach, with the City as a major
player in the effort, will seek input and support from
the community stakeholders that all have a voice and
deserve to be heard. We will consider and incorporate
each different perspective to create a cohesive effort to improve the neighborhood for all stakeholders.

Proactive Coordination
The Psomas team
recently completed
the preliminary
engineering
public outreach,
environmental
clearance, final design
and construction
support for the award
winning, North 12th
Complete Street
project for the City
of Sacramento. This
project is an example
of how the Psomas
team can effectively communicate with the project
stakeholders and address safety/traffic calming issues
important to users to help get buy-in and support
for the project. Although each project does have
differences, the above key challenges were the same
issues we successfully dealt with on the North 12th
Complete Street project. Our recent experience will
allow us to continue being proactive when dealing with
design issues on the project.

Digging deeper beyond the above challenges, we can
already anticipate the type of involvement, exhibits,
and concerns the City and stakeholders will have.

We know the type of exhibits we need to bring to
the various type of meetings with the stakeholders
to clearly explain the project improvements and
impacts. Some will be concerned with how their access
gets impacted, while others will want to know how
they can efficiently navigate through the corridor.

Clear and concise exhibits with key information will
be helpful by Council Members Orozco, Alcala, and
Mayor Guerrero to explain potential improvements
to the stakeholders in District 1. We know the
type of concerns West Sacramento Fire Station 44,
Washington Unified School District and Yolobus, route
40 and 41, will have about slower response times. We
know bike advocacy groups like Sacramento Area
Bicycle Advocates (SABA) may have concerns with
constraining road widths and ride comfort for bikes
over speed humps. We know public funds are also
limited so Mike Dour/Psomas has looked at the various
program funding sources available to public agencies
and the SACOG Regional Program for the Maintenance
& Modernization category may be a viable funding
source to consider if funding becomes an issue later.

Our past project experience enables us to save the
City time and money by predicting, and proactively
addressing project challenges. We demonstrate this
foresight by including Alison Mills from Toole Design
on our team to provide assistance with identifying
traffic calming measures just as she did previously
on her Suburban Drive/Battle Bend Boulevard project
that involved vehicles colliding with fixed objects when navigating a 90 degree turn.

Benefits of the Psomas Team
By effectively navigating each of these challenges and
opportunities, as we did on the North 12th Complete
Street project, we can improve the Cummins Way and
6th Street project area to improve the experience and
safety for all stakeholders.

Included on the next page is an exhibit showing
some of the mitigation that the City has already
considered and implemented but also a few new items
to consider for phases III and IV. The exhibit is meant to show various types of mitigation that could either
be implemented as stand alone features or combined
together with others as a system. Keeping an open
mind to options, rather than a half street width speed
hump, we recommend also looking at full street width
speed cushion humps that have wheel cutouts to
allow larger vehicles, such as emergency vehicles to
City of West Sacramento | 6th & Cummins Intersection 25 31 26 City of West Sacramento | 6th & Cummins Intersection 26 R50'
135' 125'
CUMMINS WAY / 6TH STREET TRAFFIC CALMING SAFETY MEASURES

CONCEPTUAL EXHIBIT
INSTALL STOP AHEAD (W3-1) SIGN

WITH FLASHING BEACON

INSTALL SLOW DOWN SIGN

WITH FLASHING BEACON

ON EXISTING POST

INSTALL WHITE EDGE LINE
DETAIL 27B
11'
11'
7'
7'

INSTALL STOP SIGN
(R1-1, R1-3P) ON

EXISTING POLE WITH

FLASHING BEACON
OPTION 1: INSTALL SPEED HUMP

PER NACTO GUIDANCE
OPTION 2: INSTALL

INTERSECTION MEDIAN
OPTION 3: INSTALL BULB OUT / CHICANE

PHASE II, TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY

PHASE III PHASE IV

CUMMINS WAY

CUMMINS WAY
6TH ST. 6TH ST.
6TH ST.

CUMMINS WAY
OPTION 1: TERMINATE
CUMMINS WAY*

WITH CUL-DE-SAC
OPTION 2: PURCHASE PROPERTY

AND EXTEND CUMMINS WAY

TO LIGHTHOUSE DRIVE

LIGHTHOUSE DRIVE
INSTALL NEW W1-7 SIGN AND
OBJECT MARKER OM1-3

ON EXISTING POLE
STANDARD 50' OFFSET

CUL-DE-SAC FOOTPRINT
(R/W TAKE REQUIRED)
OPTION 4: RESIDENTIAL

CONCRETE BARRIER
1" = 60'
1" = 60' 1" = 60'
* INTRODUCING A DEAD END ON CUMMINS WAY
(BEING A FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD) 850’
FROM 8TH STREET REQUIRES SPECIAL APPROVAL
PER CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE TITLE 24, PART 9.

DEAD END (FOR OPTION 3) MUST BE
POSITIONED LESS THEN 150' FROM
WELLAND WAY AND LESS THAN 150'

FROM CUMMINS WAY TO AVOID

TRIGGERING AN ADDITIONAL DEAD

END FIRE TRUCK TURNAROUND
OPTION 3: TERMINATE
CUMMINS WAY* WITH

HAMMERHEAD TURNAROUND
(MINIMUM FOOTPRINT SHOWN)
32 pass through unimpeded. Strategic placement and
geometry of both a bulb out and a median curb at
the Cummins Way/6th Street intersection could also
further reduce vehicle speeds at the corner. Design
vehicle turning templates will need to be evaluated
further after we discuss the sizes of fire emergency
vehicles that may pass through the area. As desired by
some residents in the neighborhood, some potential
improvements for consideration involve construction
on private land such as re-aligning the driveway at
17th 6th Street and placing a concrete barrier/planter
offset behind the existing back of curb to help provide an extra measure of protection for residents. However
this concrete barrier/planter also has some inherent
risks that come with it such as the concern of vehicles impacting it head on, graffiti tagging, precedence and
maintenance.

As shown for phase IV, closing off Cummins Way could
also be considered but a standard roundabout layout
has significant impacts requiring r/w acquisition. In
lieu of a typical roundabout a hammerhead layout
could reduce r/w impacts but will have to consider
the length of the dead end to the next adjacent
street at Welland Way to avoid having to place two
hammerhead layouts. This would also likely require
special approval to deviate from California Fire Code
Title 24, Part 9. These mitigations along with others,
will be considered and ranked as part of our feasibility analysis.

Scope of Services
Based on our understanding and, more importantly,
our approach to addressing the key issues, the Psomas
team has developed this detailed scope of services.

Our scope of services is set up to follow a typical work breakdown structure but, the cost associated with this
structure has been adjusted to fit within the primary
6 tasks described in the RFP. Although the final scope
of services can be adjusted, after coordination with
the City, the scope of work is expected to include the
following:

Task 1 – Project Management
Psomas will provide proactive coordination to
minimize unforeseen supplemental agreements for
activities related to project management, meetings,
schedule, agency coordination, monthly status reports,
quality control, data collection, traffic analysis, public outreach and stakeholder engagement, preliminary
engineering/feasibility analysis, CEQA documentation,
Project Summary Report, PS&E Development, utility
and coordination support, permitting, bidding
assistance, and construction support. Depending on
the improvements to implemented in the PS&E phase,
additional optional support can be incorporated
to handle additional traffic signal analysis, topo
mapping/surveys, R/W engineering and acquisition.

1.1 Meetings
Psomas will facilitate monthly project design team
(PDT) team meetings with the City to monitor the
project closely. As appropriate, Psomas will coordinate with the key stakeholders, and hold field reviews, and
other project-related focused meetings. Psomas will
hold bi-weekly internal meetings with the engineering
and environmental team to review the status and
address any outstanding issues. Sign-in sheets,
meeting agendas, meeting minutes, and supplemental
exhibits will be prepared by the Psomas team for the
PDT team meetings.

1.2 Schedule
Psomas will prepare a critical path method schedule.

The schedule will be developed in Microsoft
Project and updated monthly and reviewed with
City staff during the monthly PDT team meetings.

Working closely with the City project manager,
Psomas will supplement the initial schedule to
Rendering of concrete barrier along back of curb at 17 6th Street City of West Sacramento | 6th & Cummins Intersection 27 33 include key activities necessary for the successful
completion of the project. The schedule will indicate
the responsibility of each task and show the
interdependencies between each task.

1.3 Agency Coordination
Psomas will coordinate its efforts with the City
and key stakeholders, including the Yolobus/Yolo
County Transportation District, Washington Unified
School District, Elkhorn Village Elementary School,
Yolo County Housing Authority, Meals on Wheels
Yolo County, Broderick and Bryte Neighborhood
Association, Bryte and Broderick Community Action
Network and businesses/residents along the corridor
to inform them of the project status, gather input
regarding issues affecting the scope of the project, and to make every effort for the project to be supported by stakeholders and the affected agencies.

1.4 Monthly Status Reports
Psomas will prepare status reports and invoices
that reflect the professional services provided and
summarize the anticipated and completed tasks
monthly. The progress report will consist of a
summary of the budget spent in relation to the work
performed. Supplemental documentation, such as
schedules, can be included.

1.5 Quality Control
Psomas will provide quality control and quality
assurance for the project. This task includes
providing senior reviews to verify conformance with
City standards, identify conflicts, and monitor the
overall quality and efficiency of the project. Psomas
will document reviews and responses to the review
comments for each submittal.

Deliverables
„ Monthly team and agency coordination meeting
agenda and minutes
„ Monthly progress reports and invoices
„ Initial and updated project schedules
„ QC comments and responses
Task 2 – Data Collection, Mapping,
and Surveys

2.1 Data Collection, Mapping, and Surveys
To extract information for use on this project, Psomas
will review available studies, reports, and other
documents that may include, but are not limited to,
the West Sacramento General Plan, Sidewalks and
Transportation Equity Program (STEP), existing utility
facility mapping, and collision reports.

To make efficient use of this initial effort, readily
available aerial imagery and GIS level record map R/W
boundary linework will be used for the feasibility
analysis and preliminary plan phase to reduce costs
compared to flying a new aerial image and obtaining
title reports to determine design level r/w boundary
line work.

However, to ensure we have a good base to use for
preliminary design and set the project up to easily
transition to develop full PS&E, we will conduct a
topographic survey and prepare topographic mapping
for the intersection of Cummins Way and 6th Street in
West Sacramento.

The surveys shall include the following:

1. Cross sections locating flowline of gutter, lip of
gutter, crown of street, and centerline striping
will be located on approximate 25-foot spacing.

Additional shots on visible above ground
utilities, striping, curbs, gutter, drainage
structures and other pertinent features will be
located to provide an accurate representation of
the site within the project limit. Inverts of sewer
and storm drain facilities within surveyed area
are to be measured and pipe sizes and directions
noted, if accessible. Psomas will locate building
corners and driveway at 17 6th Street, West
Sacramento, CA.

2. Surveyors will set three (3) permanent points
for use in the performance of the topographic
survey and subsequent construction support.

The points will be tied to NAD 83 California
Coordinate System and NAVD88 using GPS CORS
survey measurements.

Depending on complexity of the improvements to be
carried forward into the final PS&E phase, as further
described below, additional scope/fee can be provided
to obtain other items of work that may be needed to
complete this project.

City of West Sacramento | 6th & Cummins Intersection 28 34 Optional Items
It is currently assumed that the improvements to be
advanced to the final PS&E phase do not require any
geotechnical/hazardous materials investigations, R/W
acquisition or new street connection to Lighthouse
Drive, re-profiling of the streets, curb and gutter
lines. If geotechnical/hazardous materials studies,
R/W acquisition and/or re-profiling of existing
streets, curb and gutter lines are deemed necessary,
we can provide additional scope/fee for the optional
tasks to complete geotechnical/hazardous materials
investigations, landscaping, additional survey control, Land Net Survey, survey topographic base mapping,
title reports, and R/W engineering documents.

Deliverables
„ Autodesk DWG file containing graphically placed
aerial imagery
„ Collision Data
„ Utility ‘A’ letters and exhibits
„ Existing Utility Facility Maps
„ Autodesk Civil 3D DWG file at 1”=20’ scale with
1-foot contour interval and record right of way
lines
„ Pertinent Survey field notes and photos
Task 3 – Technical Studies

3.1 Traffic Analysis
Data Collection
The following data will be collected and used for the
analysis and presented in summary reports:
f Daily (24-hour) directional volumes
„ Cummins Way, west of 6th Street
„ 6th Street, Cummins Way to Welland Way
„ 6th Street, between Elizabeth Street and C
Street
„ Lighthouse Drive, between Watercolor Lane
and A Street
f Intersection turning movement counts, 7-9 AM
and 4-6 PM
„ Cummins Way and 6th Street
„ A Street and Lighthouse Drive
„ B Street and 5th Street
f Collision Data provided by the City including
number, types of collision and other relevant
collision factors (i.e. speeding, impairment, time
of day, etc)
Existing data collected from the City of West
Sacramento Police Department will be reviewed and
analyzed to determine if there are any trends in
collisions that could be mitigated for to reduce overall collisions. Collision data will be summarized on an
aerial image exhibit with labels to easily depict the
types of occurrences and primary collision factor.

3.2 Stop Sign/Signal Warrant Analysis
We will evaluate stop sign warrants for the 6th
Street/Cummins Way intersection and also include
an evaluation of the peak hour signal warrant for
the potential Cummins Way/Lighthouse Drive
intersection. The signal warrant will be evaluated
based on existing traffic volumes with assumptions
made concerning the amount of neighborhood traffic
that would use the new access if it were constructed
and include a discussion of potential improvements to
be considered based on best practices.

Deliverables
„ Traffic Analysis Summary
„ Collision Data Analysis Summary Exhibit
Task 4 – Feasibility Studies

4.1 Feasibility Studies
Traffic Calming Measures
In conjunction with the technical studies completed,
Toole Design Group and Psomas will consult design
guidelines such as the City of West Sacramento
City of West Sacramento | 6th & Cummins Intersection 29 35 Standard Specifications & Details, Design Standards, and Standard Details, California Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), National
Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO)
Urban Street Design Guide, NACTO Urban Bikeway
Design Guide, American Association of State Highway
and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) – A Policy
on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, and
Caltrans Highway Design Manual and Standard Plans
to develop a variety of traffic calming measures
to mitigate for the types of collisions that have
occurred within the project area and better serve
the residents and public at this location. This may
include, but is not limited to, a variety of mitigations such as added signage, striping/pavement markings,
vertical delineators and curbing, pavement markers,
implementing a cul-de-sac, traffic circle, bulb-outs,
median islands, roadway extension, traffic signal,
concrete planter boxes/barriers, etc. Nothing is off the design table and all feasible options are to be evaluated which will allow the City to discuss the pros/cons with the stakeholders.

4.2 Feasibility Study Summary Memo
Feasibility Study Summary Memo
Toole and Psomas will prepare a summary memo
that will lead the reviewer concisely through the
mitigation evaluation process. The memo will consider
factors such as cost, constructability, schedule to
fully implement, R/W acquisition, inconvenience to
stakeholders, alternate routes for cul-de-sac scenario, signal option, and potential for collision reduction.

Operational analysis developed using Synchro for AM
and PM peak hours using existing volumes will also be
discussed for the scenarios below.
f 6th Street/Cummins Way with all-way stop and
traffic circle
f A Street/Lighthouse Drive assuming cul-de-sac
option
f Cummins Way/Lighthouse Drive signal
An evaluation matrix will also be prepared
that compares and ranks the pros/cons of the
various mitigations and even the combination of
improvements to work as a system.

Deliverables
„ Draft and Final Feasibility Study Summary
Memo
Task 5 – Public Outreach and
Stakeholder Outreach

5.1 Public Outreach and Stakeholder
Outreach
Outreach Management
Toole Design Group (Toole) will partner with the City
to support and guide the outreach effort. Combined,
they will provide strategic advice and counsel,
review project materials and reports, and monitor
team communications. In addition, Toole will attend
a project kick-off meeting, and two stakeholder
meetings, and one community workshop. Toole will
review the City’s prepared Public and Stakeholder
Outreach Plan.

Stakeholder Focus Meeting
Toole will coordinate and facilitate two (2) Key
Stakeholder Focus Group meetings. Our team of
professional facilitators will work with the City
and Psomas staff to develop meeting agendas and
presentation content that are on point and easy to
understand, then facilitate discussions in a way
that engages all parties and generates a thoughtful
discussion that leads to agreements and direction that
moves the project forward.

These meetings will focus on working with
the neighbors in the immediate vicinity of the
improvements. One of the meetings may be a meeting
on the street to discuss the feasible design options
following the technical analysis report.

The meeting will be facilitated to discuss planning,
alternatives refinement, and the environmental
process before the community workshop.

Psomas Sponsored Community Meeting
City of West Sacramento | 6th & Cummins Intersection 30 36 Community Meeting
Our team recommends holding one Community
Workshop after the project team has met with key
stakeholders and received input and guidance from the
City following the technical and feasibility analysis.

The format for the meeting is anticipated to be an
open house setting at the beginning, followed by a very short formal presentation, and a question-and-answer
session.

Deliverables „ Preparation for and Facilitation of Two
Stakeholder Meetings (2)
„ Draft and Final Public and Stakeholder Outreach
Plan
„ Draft and Final Materials for and Facilitation of
One Community Meeting
„ Draft and Final Community, Merchant, And
Business Owner Surveys (2) and Analysis of
Results
Task 6 – Preliminary Engineering

6.1 35% Design Plans and Estimate
Psomas will coordinate with the City to refine the
concepts developed as part of traffic analysis and
traffic calming measures studied and documented in
the feasibility study summary memo. 35% Design plans
(Geometric Approval Drawings) will be developed,
showing the proposed preferred improvements based
on applicable City, National and State standards plans
and guidelines consisting of horizontal, vertical
alignments, if applicable, and typical sections. These
preliminary engineering plans will be further refined
after further consultation with the City and key
stakeholders. The plans will identify potential right
of way and temporary construction easements, if
necessary. A draft and final version of the plans will
be submitted to the City for review, approval and use.

Psomas will also prepare preliminary construction
cost estimates. Quantities for major construction
items will be determined and unit costs will be applied based on our experience and recent applicable bid
results.

Deliverables „ Draft and final 35% design plans
„ Draft and final 35% construction cost estimate
Task 7 – Optional CEQA
Documentation

7.1 CEQA Documentation
Based on our review of the proposed improvements
and the lack of potential environmental impacts,
Psomas anticipates that the Project would qualify
as a Categorical Exemption (CE) pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15301(c), which applies to minor
alterations to existing public facilities.

To document the City’s decision that the Project
qualifies as a CE, Psomas will prepare a CE
Memorandum for the Project, which will include: a
brief project description; a discussion of the Project’s location and the existing environmental setting; the
applicability of the Class 1 CE to the Project; and the applicability of exceptions to the use of CE’s, which are noted in Section 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

This scope assumes one round of comments from
the project team and/or City. This scope assumes
electronic (.word and .pdf) submittal of one draft and
one final draft of the CE Memorandum. After review
and approval of the CE Memo, Psomas will prepare a
Notice of Exemption (NOE), which the City will file at
the County Clerk. This scope assumes three months
of project involvement for one environmental staff,
as well as one environmental staff attendance at two,
one-hour meetings.

If the City were to proceed with a Project alternative
that would connect Cummins Way east to Lighthouse
Drive, the Project would instead require preparation
and circulate of an Initial Study pursuant to CEQA.

Community Garden
City of West Sacramento | 6th & Cummins Intersection 31 37 This is an important cost and schedule consideration as an Initial Study requires additional resources and
time.

Deliverables „ Categorical Exemption Support Memo
„ Notice of Exemption
Task 8 – Optional Plans,
Specifications, and Estimate
(PS&E) Development
Psomas will prepare the Plans, Specifications, and
Estimate (PS&E) in accordance with City standards.

The plans will include details necessary to construct
the improvements including pavement design
(furnished by the City), signal modifications, curb
ramps, and other improvements necessary for the
project.

At the appropriate levels of design development, PS&E
submittals may include, but are not limited to, the
following:
f Title Sheet
f Survey Control
f Typical Sections
f Layouts
f Construction Details (speed humps, median
curb, concrete barrier, residential driveway
modification)
f Signing/Striping
f Bid Quantities
f Construction Cost Estimate
f Special Provisions, including general and
technical specifications
It is assumed that the PS&E does not require inclusion
of pavement design, modification of existing or
installation of new traffic signals or lighting, lighting analysis, utility relocation, roadway/civil/drainage
plan and profiles, replacements of curb ramps, as well
as traffic control/staging sheets.

8.1 65% Plans and Estimate
Psomas will prepare and submit 65% Plans and
Estimate (P&E) of the improvements for review and
comment by the City. The 65% plans will show the
improvements including the layout, typical cross
sections, grading limits, signing/striping, and
construction details, prepared in conformance with
City standards and checked against the existing site
conditions prior to the submittal.

8.2 Constructability Review
Psomas will conduct a constructability review of the
65% plans. The review will be performed by a senior
engineer and by our construction management team
with Psomas, independent of the internal design team.

Comments from the constructability review will be
distributed to the design team and the City Project
Manager. If necessary, a meeting will be held to discuss the constructability review comments and address any
outstanding comments and plan changes that improve
the quality of the contract plans.

8.3 90% Plans, Specifications and
Estimate
Psomas will prepare and submit 90% PS&E of the
improvements for review and comment by the City.

The 90% PS&E will include 65% plans and estimate
updated in response to comments received from the
City. The plans will be checked against the existing site conditions prior to the submittal.

City of West Sacramento | 6th & Cummins Intersection 32 38 8.4 100% Plans, Specifications, and
Estimate
Psomas will prepare and submit 100% PS&E of the
improvements for review and comment by the City.

The 100% PS&E will include 90% plans, specifications,
and estimate updated in response to comments
received from the City.

Deliverables „ 60% P&E
„ 90% PS&E
„ 100% PS&E
„ Responses to comments
„ Constructability review comments
„ Cross sections
Task 9 – Optional Utility
Coordination

9.1 Utility Coordination
Psomas will continue to reach out to utility owners
and prepare Utility ‘B’ and ‘C’ letters to continue
the collection of utility information for design use,
coordinate with utility owners to resolve conflicts
with the proposed improvements, and coordinate
utility relocation efforts. Utilizing the information
collected during the preliminary engineering phase
from the Utility ‘A’ inquiries, Utility ‘B’ letters will be prepared on City letterhead and sent out at the 65%
PS&E phase and will include notification of potential
utility conflicts between the existing facilities and the proposed improvements.

Utility companies will be asked to verify their existing facilities, including the location, size, and depth
(if applicable) within the work area, and confirm if
relocations are required. If utility relocations are
required, Psomas will coordinate with the conflicting
utility owners as they develop plans for their utility
relocations. It is assumed the City has prior rights and any utility relocation design and construction costs
will be the responsibility of the utility owner. Utility ‘C’ letters will be sent out at the 100% PS&E phase
when the project is ready for advertisement and will
include the anticipated project construction schedule
and deadlines for completing utility relocation work.

If necessary, as a more economical option, scope
and fee has been included to provide for limited
subsurface utility engineering (SUE) to be completed
at select locations to better define the horizontal and vertical locations of existing utilities, such as water, gas, power, waste, communications and cable/TV,
collected during the preliminary engineering phase.

For utility detecting we detect most underground
utilities by using one or all of the following: a standard electromagnetic utility locator, a ground penetrating
radar unit, sonic wave generator and magnetic locator.

With this method, we are able to find: main water
supply lines and associated branch lines made of metal
(conductive) or water lines installed with a “tracer
wire”, sewer and waste lines by electromagnetic
location, power lines, telecommunication lines, gas
lines with tracer wires. This will provide quality level B location information which is a step below quality level A – utility potholing efforts.

SUE will be isolated to the intersection area and
along the west side of 6th Street where there may
be proposed improvements that are deep enough to
potentially impact existing utilities. If the proposed
improvement depths are close to SUE discovered high
risk utility elevations, additional scope and fee for
utility potholing can also be provided once the limits of potholing efforts can be refined.

Deliverables „ Utility ‘B’ and ‘C’ letters and exhibits „ Utility contact matrix
„ Updated utility base mapping incorporating SUE
findings
Task 10 – Optional Bidding
Assistance

10.1 Bidding Assistance
Psomas will prepare a resident engineer pending
file to provide additional information to the resident
engineer for use during construction including the
quantity backup calculations, utility information, and
other design materials not included in the contract
documents. Psomas will aid in advertising the project.

This assistance will include answering questions
regarding the plans and technical specifications and
preparation of addenda. Psomas will assist the City in
responding to bidder inquiries, and clarifications, and providing ongoing consultation and interpretation of
construction documents.

City of West Sacramento | 6th & Cummins Intersection 33 39 Deliverables „ Resident engineer pending file
„ Responses to inquiries
„ Addenda
Task 11 – Optional Construction
Support

11.1 Construction Support
Psomas will assist the City in providing construction
support, as needed, which will include the following
tasks:
f Attend pre-construction meeting
f Provide ongoing consultation and interpretation
of construction documents in response to RFIs
f Provide assistance and necessary plan changes
to issue change orders during construction
f Provide construction engineering assistance
f Assist with reviewing and approving submittals
and shop drawings
f Prepare as-built plans from a single, red-lined
plan set provided by the Contractor
Deliverables „ Responses to RFIs
„ Change orders
„ As-built plans
Assumptions
f The project would qualify as categorically
exempt from CEQA. If completion of an Initial
Study to support a Negative Declaration or
a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be
required, then Psomas is available to complete
these services under an amended agreement.
f NEPA documentation will not be required.
f Consultation with Native American tribes is not
included in this scope of work. If the City wishes
Psomas to support them in notifying interested
tribes pursuant to AB 52 or to support City
consultation with tribes, Psomas is available
to provide those services under an amended
contract.
f Evaluation of properties as historic resources
would not be required. If the City wishes to
evaluate any properties, Psomas is available
to provide those services under an amended
agreement.
f Hazardous materials testing and
characterization, if needed, would be provided
by the City or under an amended agreement.
f Because the project area is highly developed
with very limited to no unpaved, it is expected
that natural habitat that supports wildlife and/
or special-status plant species is absent from
the project area, and site surveys for biological
resources would not be required to support
CEQA review.
f Acquisition of regulatory permits is not
anticipated to be required due to the absence of
jurisdictional areas.
f The City will be responsible for payment of
CEQA filing fees and posting CEQA notices on
the City’s website and/or other locations of the
City’s choosing.
f Assumes no drainage study or report is
required.
f Potholing efforts are optional and assumed not
required otherwise additional scope/fee for
utility potholing can be provided, if necessary.
f Optional fees do not include the new 6th Street
connection to Lighthouse Drive scenario.
f No existing traffic signals will be modified.
f Limited topo base mapping included from
flowline to flowline along Cummins Way and 6th
Street.
f Permission to enter or rights of entry will be
coordinated by the City.

The following tasks are excluded from this proposal:
f Preparation, processing, and filing of a record of
survey.
f The setting of monuments and re-establishing
monuments destroyed during construction.
f Map checking, corner record, and recording
fees.
f Boundary/right-of-way determination unless
provided under an amended contract.
f Preparation of any legal description or exhibit
plats.
f Tying survey to published benchmark.
f Obtaining or review of title reports.

City of West Sacramento | 6th & Cummins Intersection 34 40 CPE23-244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025

EXHIBIT B
Schedule of Performance
Contract Start Date November 1, 2023
Contract End Date December 31, 2025
41 CPE23-244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025

EXHIBIT C
Schedule of Fees
42 Tasks Task Description Unit of Measure # of Hours Hourly Rate Total No Bid 1 Conduct technical studies including but not limited to traffic data, stop sign warrant analysis, collision data, public outreach, MUTCD recommendations, traffic engineering studies, and further studies approved by City Staff.

Hours 139 $105 - $265 $23,245.00 FALSE
2 Conduct feasibility studies of implementing traffic calming and mitigation strategies for the intersection. Review Phase III and IV proposed improvements including but not limited to installing a traffic circle, dead-end cul-de-sac, lane channelizers, speed bumps, and extending Cummins Way to Lighthouse Drive.

Hours 245 $105 - $265 $46,235.00 FALSE
3 Develop 35% design plans with estimates, alternatives, and recommendations for City to implement. Hours 90 $135 - $265 $14,530.00 FALSE
4 Conduct public outreach with residents and stakeholders in the community and neighborhood, attend meetings with City staff to discuss data collected, results, recommendations, and findings.

Hours 85 $105 - $240 $15,920.00 FALSE
SUBTOTAL FOR TASKS 1-4 $99,930.00

OPTIONAL TASKS
5 Develop full PS&E for selected traffic calming alternative Hours 322 $135 - $265 $54,390.00 FALSE 6 Consultant is encouraged to recommend additional or modified tasks deemed vital to the Project’s success. Hours 126 $105 - $230 $22,290.00 FALSE Total $176,610.00
43 CPE23-
244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025

EXHIBIT D
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR CODE § 3700
[Labor Code § 1861]
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.

CONSULTANTS
By:

Paul Gervacio, Vice President –
Senior Project Manager
44 CPE23-
244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025

EXHIBIT E

LABOR COMPLIANCE

1. PREVAILING WAGE
A. The Work contemplated herein constitutes a public work within the meaning of Labor Code sections 1720 and 1771. It shall be mandatory upon the Consultant and upon any Subcontractor, to pay not less than the said specified prevailing rates of wages to all workers employed by them under the Contract in accordance with Labor Code section 1774. The Director of the Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR") of the State of California has determined the general prevailing rate of wages of per diem wages in the locality in which the work is to be performed for each craft or type of worker needed to execute the Contract. The Consultant acknowledges that it has examined the prevailing rate of per diem wages as established by the DIR. Copies of the current schedules for prevailing wages are on file at City Hall, and the contents of those schedules are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. The Consultant shall post a copy of the applicable prevailing wage determinations at each job site, along with any other work place posters required by law.

B. The City will not recognize any claims for additional compensation because of the payment of prevailing wages. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by the Consultant in determining its proposal, and will not under any circumstances be considered as the basis of a claim against the City.

C. By executing this Contract Consultant warrants that it has registered with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with Labor Code section 1725.5.

2. PREVAILING WAGE RECORDS
A. The Consultant and each subcontractor shall keep an accurate payroll record which shows the name, address, social security number, correct work classification (in accordance with the wage decision), both straight and overtime worked each day and week, and hourly rate of pay, gross wages earned, deductions made and net wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker or other employee paid by the Consultant /subcontractor in connection with the Work. These payroll records shall be certified and shall be made available at Consultant's principal office. These records shall be maintained during the course of the Work. The Consultant and all subcontractors shall make the certified payroll records available for inspection by City representatives upon request and shall permit such representatives to interview employees during the work hours on the job site.

B. The City shall notify the Consultant in writing of any discrepancies or violations that are discovered during such inspections. Written notification pursuant to this Section shall include the actions that will be necessary to resolve the discrepancies and/or violations. The Consultant shall be held entirely responsible for the prompt resolution of all non-compliances with the prevailing wage laws, including those pertaining to all subcontractors and any lower-tier subcontractors. The Consultant shall forfeit as penalty to the City the amount specified by law for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker (whether employed by the Consultant or any subcontractor) paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under the Contract in violation of the provisions of the Labor Code and in particular, Section 1775.

C. To the extent applicable, Consultant and subcontractors shall maintain and furnish to the Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR"), a certified copy of each weekly payroll (but no less often than monthly), with a statement of compliance signed under penalty of perjury. Such certified payroll reports shall be transmitted electronically to the DIR.
45 CPE23-
244 PSOMAS
6th and Cummins Intersection Improvements
Expires 12/31/2025
D. The City will not recognize any claims for additional compensation because of the payment of the prevailing wages. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by the Consultant in entering into the Contract, and will not under any circumstances, other than delays caused by the City, or the City’s agents, be considered as the basis of a claim against the City.

3. Labor Discrimination
Attention is directed to Section 1735 of the Labor Code, which reads as follows:
“No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of their race, color, national origin or ancestry, physical handicap, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such person, except as provided in Section 12940 of the Government Code, and every General Contractor for public works violating this section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of this chapter.”
4 Eight-Hour Day Limitation
(a) In accordance with the provisions of the Labor Code, and in particular, Sections 1810 to 1815 thereof, inclusive, incorporated herein by reference, eight hours labor shall constitute a day's work, and no worker in the employ of Consultant, or any Subcontractor, doing or contracting to do any part of the work contemplated by the Contract, shall be required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of those provisions; provided that subject to Labor Code Section 1815, a worker may perform work in excess of either eight (8) hours per day or forty (40) hours during any one week upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours per day or forty (40) hours during any one week at not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay. (b) The Consultant and each Subcontractor shall also keep an accurate record showing the names and actual hours worked of all workers employed by them in connection with the Contract. This record shall be open at all reasonable hours to the inspection of the City. It is hereby further agreed that, except as provided in (a) above, the Consultant shall forfeit as a penalty to the City the sum of twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the performance of the Contract by the Consultant or by any of its Subcontractors for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in and one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of Sections 1810 through 1815.

5. Compliance with State Requirements for Employment of Apprentices (a) The Consultant's attention is directed to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code. Provisions of said Section pertaining to employment of registered apprentices are hereby incorporated by reference into this Contract. As applicable, the Consultant or any Subcontractor employed by the Consultant in the performance of this Contract shall take such actions as necessary to comply with the provisions of Section 1777.5. 46 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 1, 2023 ITEM # 5
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 23-9 AMENDING TITLE 10 (VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING

TO THE RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (CIP 12019)
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT PREPARED BY:

Joanna Ortiz, Assistant Engineer
Christian Asuncion, Associate Civil Engineer
Capital Projects Department
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to consider the approval of proposed amendments to Title 10 of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council waive the second reading and adopt, Ordinance 23-9, amending Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento.

BACKGROUND
The City of West Sacramento is dedicated to providing a safe environment for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Setting speed limits requires a rational procedure to maintain the confidence of the public and legal systems. Determining speed limits relies on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of drivers. According to the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 22358, posted speed limits along collector and arterial roadways must be established and justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey. These posted speed limits must also be updated every seven (7) years and can be extended to ten (10) years when a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred.

The last update to the Citywide speed limit surveys was conducted in 2013. On August 3, 2020, City staff solicited proposals for professional services with a Request for Proposal (RFP) posted to the City website. The City received proposals from the following three firms, listed in alphabetical order:
 Kimley Horn
 Mott MacDonald
 TJKM
A three (3) person panel ranked and evaluated the proposals. The panel concluded that Mott MacDonald was the most qualified consultant to complete this assignment and to do so in a timely manner. The City Council approved the contract with Mott MacDonald on November 18, 2020.

Upon approval of the Mott MacDonald contract, City staff, in coordination with the Police Department, prioritized approximately 15 segments throughout the City to update. The radar speed surveys for these prioritized segments were conducted by National Data & Surveying (NDS) from February-April 2021.

Since speed limits are codified in the City Municipal Code, even though there were no speed limit changes proposed, an ordinance was required to reestablish the speed limits with the correct date of the reestablishment in code. Ordinance 21-09 was approved by City Council on June 16, 2021.

Following approval of Ordinance 21-09, City staff prioritized a second set of segments to evaluate throughout the City. The radar speed surveys for these segments were conducted by National Data & Surveying (NDS) from June-July 2021.
47 Citywide Speed Limit Survey Project
November 1, 2023

Ordinance 22-15 was approved by City Council on March 2, 2022 for the second set of segments.

Following approval of Ordinance 22-15, Mott MacDonald completed the evaluation for a third set of segments.

Ordinance 23-5 for these segments was approved by City Council on April 19, 2023.

ANALYSIS
Following approval of Ordinance 23-5, City staff determined the remaining segments to be included with the fourth set to be evaluated by the consultant.

The segments along with the recommended changes are listed in the table below:

Road Segment Name
Current
Posted
Speed Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Speed
Limit
Change?
1 Jefferson Boulevard between Southport Parkway and City Limits (South) 55 55 No
2 Park Boulevard between Jefferson Boulevard and Stone
Boulevard 25 25 No
3 West Capitol Avenue between Enterprise Boulevard and
Northport Drive 40 40 No
4 West Capitol Avenue between Northport Drive and Harbor Boulevard 40 40 No
5 West Capitol Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and
Sycamore Street 35 35 No
6 West Capitol Avenue between Sycamore Street and
Jefferson Boulevard 35 35 No
7 West Capitol Avenue between Jefferson Boulevard and
Grand Street 35 35 No
8 West Capitol Avenue between Grand Street and 5th Street 35 35 No For several of the segments, the 85th percentile was significantly greater than the currently posted speed limit, and this required further evaluation. These segments are Segments 1, 2, 3, and 5 from the table above.

According to the CA Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devises (CA MUTCD) Section 2B.13, paragraph 12a, the posted speed limit “shall be established at the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of freeflowing traffic.” The CA-MUTCD also allows for further evaluation by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer in order to lower the posted speed limits. A lower speed limit could be justified by consideration of accident data, conditions not readily apparent to the driver, residential density, and pedestrian and bicycle safety.

In addition, the CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13 included a California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 22358.8, which states “Local agency may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8.” The standard further states that “Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.” Based on the CA-MUTCD 2014 Revision 7, Section 2B.13, Mott MacDonald recommended no changes to the current posted speed limit.

Environmental Considerations
Not Applicable.

Commission Recommendations
This item does not require policy guidance from the Commission. 48 Citywide Speed Limit Survey Project
November 1, 2023

Strategic Plan Integration
The Project and recommended actions support the City Council’s Strategic Principle of Core Services and infrastructure: “Sustain a financially sound city in which everyone feels safe and secure, with quality services and well-maintained infrastructure.”
Alternatives
The City Council’s primary alternatives are summarized below:
1) Approve the recommended action as stated above.
2) Delay or revise the recommended action.
3) Not approve the recommended action.

Alternative 1 is staff’s recommended action. Delay of the project or not approving the recommended action would further delay updating posted speed limits as required per CVC 22358.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Capital Projects Department in coordination with and review by the Finance Department and the City Attorney’s Office.

Budget/Cost Impact
This project is included in the current Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as CIP 12019. Sufficient funding is included in the project budget for the recommended actions and no additional funding appropriations are required or being requested at this time.

ATTACHMENTS
1) Ordinance 23-9
2) 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
49 Attachment 1
ORDINANCE 23-9

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO AMENDING MUNICIAPL CODE CHAPTER 10.18 The City Council of the City of West Sacramento does ordain as follows:

Section 1. Purpose and Authority. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend Chapter

10.18 of the Municipal Code
Section 2. Authority. The City Council enacts this Ordinance in accordance with the authority granted to cities by State law.

Section 2. Amendment. Section 10.18.010 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Chapter 10.18 SPEED LIMITS

10.18.010 Findings.

A. Pursuant to Chapter 10.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code, on September 27, 2023, the city council of the city of West Sacramento reviewed and considered the engineering and traffic survey, and related information, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

B. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the city council finds that the following streets shall have the following posted speed limits:

Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Jefferson Boulevard Southport Parkway and City Limits
(South) 55
Park boulevard Jefferson boulevard and Stone
Boulevard 25
West Capitol Ave Enterprise Boulevard and Northport
Drive 40
West Capitol Ave Northport Drive and Harbor Boulevard 40 West Capitol Ave Harbor Boulevard and Sycamore Street 35 West Capitol Ave Sycamore Street and Jefferson
Boulevard 35
West Capitol Ave Jefferson Boulevard and Grand Street 35 West Capitol Ave Grand Street and 5th Street 35
50 C. Pursuant to Chapter 10.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code, on April 19, 2023, the city council of the city of West Sacramento reviewed and considered the engineering and traffic survey, and related information, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

D. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the city council finds that the following streets shall have the following posted speed limits:

Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Anna Street Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive 25
Boatman Avenue Industrial Boulevard and Terminal
Street 25
Bryte Avenue Riverbank Road and Sacramento Ave 25
C Street 5
th Street and City Limit 30
Carlin Drive Oates Drive and Ramco Street 35
Carrie Street Bryte Avenue and Kegle Drive 25
Cebrian Street Del Monte Street and Stone Boulevard 30
Channel Drive Seaport Boulevard and Channel Drive 35
Commerce Drive West end and east end 25
Davis Road Seymour Avenue and Jefferson
Boulevard 30
Douglas Street Lighthouse Drive and Sacramento
Avenue 25
Duluth Street Galveston Street and Harbor Boulevard 25
Evergreen Ave Pine Street and Harbor Boulevard 30
Evergreen Ave Harbor Boulevard and Coke Street 30
Front Street Shore Street and Terminal Street 25
Galveston Street Duluth Street and Houston Street 25
Golden Gate Drive Oakland Bay Drive and Promenade
Street 30
Golden Gate Drive Promenade Street and Marshall Road 30 Gregory Avenue Bevan Road and South River Road 45
Harmon Road Jefferson Boulevard and Antioch
Avenue 30
Hart Avenue Allen Avenue and Higgins Road 25
Houston Street West Capitol Avenue and Duluth Street 25 Higgins Road Linden Road and Hart Avenue 25
51 Ordinance 23-9
September 27, 2023
Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Higgins Road Hart Ave and Jefferson Blvd 25
Jefferson Boulevard West Capitol Avenue and 15th Street 35 Jefferson Boulevard Davis Road and Southport Parkway 55 Lighthouse Drive Fountain Drive and Kegle Drive 25
Maple Street West Capitol Avenue and Michigan
Boulevard 25
Merkley Avenue Sycamore Street and Westacre Road 25
Michigan Boulevard Pecan Street and Portsmouth Avenue 25 Michigan Boulevard Portsmouth Avenue and Jefferson
Boulevard 25
North Harbor Boulevard Riverbank Road and Reed Avenue 45 Northport Drive Commerce Drive and West Capitol
Avenue 30
Oakland Bay Drive Southport Parkway and Golden Gate
Drive (east) 35
Oates Street Carlin Drive and Ramos Drive 30
Pine Street West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen
Avenue 25
Poplar Street Evergreen Avenue and Michigan
Boulevard 25
Port Street Shore Street and Terminal Street 30
Promenade Way Ramos Drive and Golden Gate Drive 30
Ramco Street Southport Pkwy and south end terminus 35
Ramco Street Oates Street and Promenade Street 30
Riverbank Road North Harbor Road and Bryte Avenue 25
Seaport Boulevard West End and Parkway Boulevard 35
Shore Street Front Street and Del Monte Street 30
Stonegate Drive Lake Washington Blvd and Village
Parkway 35
Sutter Street West Capitol Avenue and north end
terminus 25
Sycamore Street West Capitol Avenue and Evergreen
Avenue 25
52 Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Terminal Street Del Monte Street and Industrial
Boulevard 30
Todhunter Avenue Anna Street and Sacramento Avenue 25
Westacre Road Michigan Boulevard and West Capitol
Avenue 25
3 rd Street B Street and West Capitol Avenue 25
15th Street Jefferson Boulevard and South River
Road 30
E. Pursuant to Chapter 10.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code, on April 6, 2022, the city council of the city of West Sacramento reviewed and considered the engineering and traffic survey, and related information, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

F. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the city council finds that the following streets shall have the following posted speed limits:

Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Linden Rd. (North) Summerfield Dr. to Jefferson Blvd. 35 Linden Rd Stonegate Dr. to Alder Way 35
Del Monte St. Harbor Blvd to Cebrian St 35
Cummins St. Kegle Dr. to 6th St. 25
Sunset Ave. North Harbor Blvd. to Sacramento Ave. 35
Davis Rd. Jefferson Blvd. to Antioch Ave. 40
Davis Rd. Antioch Ave. to South River Rd. 40
Harbor Blvd. Reed Ave. to Rice Ave. 35
Jefferson Blvd. Sacramento Ave. to West Capitol Ave. 40 Jefferson Blvd. Stone Blvd. to Lake Washington Blvd. 45 Jefferson Blvd. Lake Washington Blvd to Linden Rd.
(South) 45
Jefferson Blvd. Linden Rd. (South) to Davis Rd. 45
Kegle Dr. Anna St. to Sacramento Ave. 25
Lake Washington Blvd. Jefferson Blvd. to Stonegate Dr. 35 Linden Rd. (South) Summerfield Dr. to Jefferson Blvd. 35 Linden Rd. Jefferson Blvd. to Stonegate Dr. 35
53 Ordinance 23-9
September 27, 2023
Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Sacramento Ave. Kegle Dr. to 6th St. 40
Southport Pkwy. Promenade St. to Marshall St. 45
Southport Pkwy. Marshall Rd. to Jefferson Blvd. 35
Enterprise Blvd. Seaport Blvd. to Channel Dr. 35
Riverside Pkwy. Reed Ave to Stillwater Rd. 35
6 th St. Cummins Way to C Street 25
Embarcadero Dr. Riverside Pkwy. (N) to Riverside Pkwy.
(S) 30
F St. 8
th St. to 2nd St. 30
Marshall Rd. Seymour Ave to Jefferson Blvd. 35
F St. Jefferson Blvd to 8th St. 35
G. Pursuant to Chapter 10.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code, on July 14, 2021, the city council of the city of West Sacramento reviewed and considered the engineering and traffic survey, and related information, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

H. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the city council finds that the following streets shall have the following posted speed limits:

Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Enterprise Boulevard West Capitol Avenue to Seaport Blvd. 40 Gregory Avenue Jefferson Boulevard to Bevan Road 45
Harbor Boulevard Rice Avenue to West Capitol Avenue 35
Harbor Boulevard West Capitol Avenue to Industrial
Boulevard 35
Industrial Boulevard Enterprise Boulevard to Parkway
Boulevard 45
Industrial Boulevard Parkway Boulevard to Harbor Boulevard 45 Industrial Boulevard Harbor Boulevard to Stone Boulevard 45 Jefferson Boulevard 15th Street to Stone Boulevard 45
Lake Washington
Boulevard Stone Boulevard to Jefferson Boulevard 45
Reed Avenue Riverside Parkway to Sunset Avenue 40
Sacramento Avenue Sunset Avenue to Kegle Drive 40
54 Street From/To Recommended Speed
Limit
Southport Parkway Ramco Street to Lake Washington
Boulevard 45
Stillwater Road Reed Avenue to Riverside Parkway 40
Stone Boulevard Park Boulevard and Jefferson Parkway 25 5th Street A Street to West Capitol Avenue 35
Section 3. Severability. If any provision of this chapter, or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, the remainder of this chapter, to the extent it can be given effect, or the application of those provisions to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are severable.

Section 4. Effective Date and Publication. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its adoption, and pursuant to Resolution 99-46 was published in summary format prior to adoption, and a summary will be published within 15 days after adoption in a paper of general circulation published and circulated within the City of West Sacramento. 55 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento this 1st

day of November 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST: Approved as to form:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney CODIFY X UNCODIFY __________
56 Engineering & Traffic Surveys
City of West Sacramento
August 2023
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 57 507323716 REP A
C:\Users\NAR77489\Desktop\507367762-001 -
SR33_HenryMiller_TOAR_ICE_11302019.docx
Mott MacDonald
Mott MacDonald
180 Promenade Circle
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95834
Engineering & Traffic Surveys
City of West Sacramento
Final Report
August 2023

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 58 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys
Final Report
504100132-Cityofwestsac_Speedsurveysreport_08302023.Docx Issue and revision record
Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description
1 08/11/2023 RN JN TA Draft Report
2 08/30/2023 RN JN TA Final Report
Information class: Standard
This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the abovecaptioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose.

We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties.

This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.

This R eport has been prepar ed sol ely for use by the party w hich commissi oned it (the 'Client') in connection wi th the capti oned pr oject. It shoul d not be used for any other purpose. N o person other than the Client or any party w ho has expr essly agreed terms of reli ance with us (the 'Recipi ent(s)') may r ely on the content, information or any views expr essed in the R eport. This R eport is confi denti al and contains pr opri etary intell ectual pr operty and we accept no duty of car e, r esponsibility or li ability to any other recipi ent of this R eport. N o repr esentati on, w arranty or undertaki ng, express or im plied, is made and no responsi bility or liability is accepted by us to any party other than the Client or any Reci pient(s), as to the accuracy or com pleteness of the i nformati on contai ned i n this R eport. For the avoi dance of doubt thi s Report does not i n any w ay pur port to i nclude any legal, insurance or fi nanci al advice or opi nion.

We disclaim all and any liability w hether arising i n tort, contr act or otherwise w hich we might otherwise have to any party other than the Cli ent or the Reci pient(s), in respect of this Report, or any inform ation contained in it. W e accept no responsi bility for any error or omissi o n in the Report w hich is due to an error or omissi on in data, i nformation or statements supplied to us by other parti es i ncludi ng the Cli ent (the 'Data'). We have not independently verified the D ata or otherwise exami ned i t to determi ne the accuracy, com pleteness, sufficiency for any purpose or feasi bility for any particular outcome incl uding fi nanci al.

Forecasts presented i n this docum ent w ere pr epared usi ng the Data and the Repor t is dependent or based on the D ata. Inevitably, som e of the assumptions used to develop the for ecasts will not be realised and unantici pated events and circumstances m ay occur. C onsequently, we do not guarantee or w arrant the conclusions contained in the R eport as ther e are likely to be differences betw een the forecasts and the actual results and those differ ences may be m aterial. While we consi der that the information and opini ons given in this R eport are sound all parti es m ust rely on their ow n skill and judgem ent when m aking use of it.

Information and opi nions ar e current only as of the date of the Report and w e accept no responsi bility for updati ng such information or opi nion. It shoul d, therefor e, not be assum ed that any such inform ati on or opi nion conti nues to be accurate subsequent to the date of the Report. U nder no circum stances m ay this Report or any extract or summ ary thereof be used i n connecti on with any public or private securities offeri ng incl udi ng any related m emor andum or pr ospectus for any securiti es offering or stock exchange listi ng or announcem ent.

By acceptance of this Repor t you agree to be bound by this disclaim er. This disclaim er and any issues, disputes or cl aims arising out of or in connection wi th it (whether contractual or non-contractual i n natur e such as cl aims i n tort, from br each of statute or regul ati on or otherwise) shall be governed by, and constr ued i n accordance with, the law s of Engl and and W ales to the exclusion of all conflict of l aws principles and r ules. All disputes or claims arising out of or r elati ng to this discl aimer shall be subject to the excl usive jurisdicti on of the English and Welsh courts to w hich the parties irrevocably submit.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 59 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys
Final Report
504100132-Cityofwestsac_Speedsurveysreport_08302023.Docx Contents
Executive Summary 1
Certification 2
1 Introduction 3
2 Study Purpose and Methodology 5

2.1 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements 5

2.2 Speed Data Collection 7

2.3 Traffic Count Data Collection 8

2.4 Collision Data Analysis 9

2.5 Field Reviews and ‘Floating Car’ Surveys 10
3 Data Summary & Recommendations 11

3.1 Data Summary 11

3.2 Speed Limit Recommendations 12
Appendix 14
Not the
Tables
Table 1: Statewide Average Accident Rates for Roadway Types 10 Table 2: Roadway Classification, Traffic Count and Collision Data Summary 11 Table 3: E&TS Summary 12
Table 4: Summary of Speed Limit Recommendations 13
Figures
Figure 1: Citywide Speed Survey Locations Map 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 60 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 1
Final Report
Executive Summary
This Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) report prepared in conformance with requirements contained in the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD, Revision 7, effective March 10, 2023) for speed zone studies, summarizes the data, evaluation, findings and recommendations for posted speed limits on study roadway segments in the City of West Sacramento. The study segments as identified by City staff are listed as follows:

Based on the data and evaluation contained in this report, for all of the study segments listed above, the current posted speed limits are recommended to be retained. Detailed discussions are contained in subsequent sections of this report.

City's
Index
#
Road Segment Name
48 Jefferson Boulevard between Southport Parkway and City Limits (South). 73 Park Boulevard between Jefferson Boulevard and Stone Boulevard. 108 West Capitol Avenue between Enterprise Boulevard and Northport Drive. 109 West Capitol Avenue between Northport Drive and Harbor Boulevard. 110 West Capitol Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Sycamore Avenue. 111 West Capitol Avenue between Sycamore Avenue and Jefferson Boulevard. 112 West Capitol Avenue between Jefferson Boulevard and Grand Street. 113 West Capitol Avenue between Grand Street and 5th Street.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 61 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 2
Final Report
Certification
This report includes the engineering and traffic surveys of speed limits within the City West Sacramento. The existing posted speed limits were reviewed for compliance with California Vehicle Code, Section 40802, which requires the preparation of engineering and traffic surveys for road segments with enforcement by radar or other electronic devices. The following reference materials were also used in the preparation of this report:

1. California Vehicle Code (CVC) – As of January 1, 2023.

2. California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD, 2014, Revision 7, effective March 10, 2023) – State of California, Department of Transportation, Sacramento, California.

All data utilized in this report is on file in the Capital Projects and Transportation Department, City of West Sacramento, 1110 West Capitol Avenue, West Sacramento, CA 95691.

The firms of Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. and Advanced Mobility Group, Inc. on behalf of the City of West Sacramento, have prepared this document.

I, Ravi Narayanan, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of West Sacramento, and this report was prepared under my supervision. This report’s contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
08/30/2023
____________________________
Ravi Narayanan, P.E., T.E.

Registered Civil Engineer 64326
Registered Traffic Engineer 2401

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 62 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 3
Final Report
1 Introduction
The City of West Sacramento, Capital Projects and Transportation Department is undertaking studies for the update of Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) for multiple roadway segments throughout the City. The purpose and intent of this E&TS is to review and update existing posted speed limits in accordance with traffic engineering practices based on the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), Revision 7, and the California Vehicle Code (CVC Section 40802).

Figure 1 illustrates the location of the study segments on a Citywide map, and also indicates the existing roadway classification and current posted speed limits on these segments.

This report contains the following:
• Overview of statutory/regulatory requirements and relevant policies/guidelines that govern the need and requirements for the preparation of E&TS. • A brief overview of data methodologies used for collection, compilation and review/analysis of study data elements including, but not limited to, speed survey data, traffic count data and collision data.
• An E&TS summary sheet for study roadway segments that includes data summary as well as posted speed limit recommendation for the subject segment. • Technical Appendices that contain extracts of key regulatory document sections referenced in this study, as well as the raw or processed data used in the study.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 63 #48
#73
#108
#109 #110
#111
#112
#113
Legend:

Collector
Local Street
Low Access Control
Low-medium Access Control
Medium-high Access Control
City Segment Index Number
Existing Speed Limit
(As of March 2022)
Speed Surveys Study
City of West Sacramento
Map Source: City of West
Sacramento Public Access GIS Map
Citywide Speed Survey Locations Map
Figure 1
C:\Users\CHO90539\Desktop\Projects\City of West Sacramento\Speed Survey Locations.dwg #XX
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 64 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 5
Final Report
2 Study Purpose and Methodology

2.1 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
Traffic speed zone surveys should fulfill California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 22357 and 22358, which require local agencies to follow certain procedures established by Caltrans in establishing new speed limits and revising existing speed limits. Furthermore, CVC Section 40802 requires speed limits enforced by radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects to be evaluated on a recurring basis by an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) conforming to CVC Section 627. If the E&TS are more than five (5) years old, the speed zone is considered to be a “speed trap” under CVC Section 40802 and courts may reject evidence of speeding obtained through radar or other electronic devices.

E&TS may be up to seven (7) years old if conditions under CVC Section 40802(c)(1) related to enforcement training and equipment certification have been met.

On January 1, 2012, CVC 21400(b) became effective requiring the Department of Transportation (i.e. Caltrans) to revise the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD) so that speed limits are based on field-collected speed data. Note that pursuant to recently passed California State Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43, Friedman, Traffic Safety) and Assembly Bill 1939 (AB 1939, Friedman, Traffic Safety, Speed limits), the CAMUTCD 2014, Section 2B.13 has been comprehensively revised per Revision 7 (effective March 10, 2023). The speed limit setting procedure is built around a ‘spot speed’ survey that typically consists of measuring speeds with a calibrated radar gun or other electronic device of motor vehicles traveling at free-flow speeds in each direction on a two-way street. The most important data point collected is the “85th percentile speed”, also referred to as the “critical speed”, which is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the sampled motor vehicles travelled during the data collection period.

According to CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, paragraph 12a, the posted speed limit “shall be established at the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.” For example, a segment with an 85th percentile speed of 32 mph would have a rounded-down posted speed limit of 30 mph, while another segment with an 85th percentile speed of 33 mph would have a rounded-up posted speed limit of 35 mph. The CA-MUTCD allows the posted speed limit to be lowered by no more than 5 mph from a rounded speed, using one of two options that depend on whether the 85th percentile speed has been rounded down or up. The options may be applied as follows:
• Option 1: Option 1 within CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, paragraph 12a says “The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.” The cited CVC Section 627 defines an E&TS that is required to consider prevailing speeds, accident records, and conditions not readily apparent to the driver, and optionally consider residential density as well as pedestrian and bicycle safety. Note that the basis for a speed limit that is more than 5 mph lower than the 85th percentile speed is something other than prevailing speeds. In regards to conditions not readily apparent to the driver, CVC 22358 states that “physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 65 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 6
Final Report
other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning.”
• Option 2: Option 2 within CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13 paragraph 12a says “For cases in which the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5-mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.” The Option 2 round-down, which became available when CVC Section 21400(b) went into effect January 1, 2012, requires no E&TS to post the speed limit sign. The E&TS is required nevertheless, however, to allow radar or similar devices to be used for enforcement.

Note again that consideration of accident data is a requirement for an E&TS as defined in CVC Section 627. However, CVC Section 21400(b) notes that in cases where Option 2 round-down is used, no further reduction in speed limit is allowed “for any reason”. Therefore, the prevailing collision data/rates based justification for speed limit decrease by 5 mph below the nearest 85th percentile speeds is only used with Option 1, and not with Option 2.

Although Option 1 could also be applied where recorded speeds are rounded up, Option 2 achieves the same reduced speed limit with lesser documentation requirements. According to the CA-MUTCD, Option 1’s documentation requirements consist of an E&TS that “shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.” The reduction must be based on considerations other than prevailing speeds, such as accident data, conditions not readily apparent to the driver, residential density, and pedestrian and bicycle safety. • According to CVC Section 22358.5, “conditions not readily apparent to the driver” exclude roadway width, curvature, grade, and surface conditions. Neither the CVC nor the CAMUTCD provide much specific guidance regarding accident data or pedestrian or bicycle safety. The CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, paragraph 34 notes however that “generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surfaces in collision histories.” Prevailing collision rates that are higher than statewide average rates for similar facilities are typically used as reasons to justify a recommended 5 mph speed limit reduction below 85th percentile speed, when Option 1 is used. • CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, paragraph 38 says “speed zones of less than 0.5 miles and short transition zones should be avoided.”
• For this study, an 85th percentile speed that coincided with a 5-mph increment was regarded as eligible for an Option 1 reduction, but not for an Option 2 round-down. • While the CA-MUTCD allows two options for lowering the posted speed limit, note that it offers no provision for raising the posted speed limit above the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed.

Note further that CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13 has included CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit), and offers the following option “Local agency may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8.” The standard further states that “Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 66 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 7
Final Report
or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.”
Residential Streets: CVC Section 22352(b)(1) defines prima facie speed limit as follows:

Twenty-five miles per hour (25 mph) on any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. CVC Section 627(c)(1) provides specific guidance on residential density. It may also be noted that many residential neighborhoods in the City of West Sacramento meet the density threshold of 16 separate dwelling houses or business structures per quarter mile of roadway frontage (both sides collectively). The statute does not apply to roadways within a business district. When residential density is considered per CVC Section 627(c)(1), judgment is applied as to whether a street lined with apartment buildings and condominiums should be considered a business district or a residential district. CVC Section 40802(b)(1) defines a “local street or road” as a facility that “primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions: (A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet, (B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length.

Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445, and (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.”
Appendix Exhibit A and Appendix Exhibit B contain the relevant CVC and CA-MUTCD 2014, Section 2B.13, Revision 7 sections respectively, that are referenced in this E&TS.

Appendix Exhibit C contains a separate E&TS for each study segment.

2.2 Speed Data Collection
The radar speed surveys were conducted by National Data & Surveying (NDS) in accordance with California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) Regulations and CA-MUTCD guidance.

The speed surveys for the study segments in this report were conducted in April 2022 and in April 2023. The CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13, paragraph 27 provides guidance in the performance of speed data collection surveys i.e. field speed measurements, including the following:
• “The intent of the speed survey is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.” • “Speed measurements should be taken during off peak hours on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.”
The following general criteria and procedures were used in the speed data collection process:
• A representative number of ‘spot speeds’ were obtained by radar and recorded at each roadway location. The data was collected during ‘free flow’ (i.e. uncongested) periods, and a minimum of 100 samples in each direction of travel were taken for each highvolume location. For low-volume locations, the survey was conducted for a minimum of one hour or until at least 50 samples in each direction were obtained. Speed survey data DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 67 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 8
Final Report
was conducted on a typical weekday (Tuesday through Thursday). Known peak travel periods were generally avoided and note that data collection was conducted between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM or between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM only if free-flow or uncongested travel conditions occurred.
• All surveys were conducted in clear, dry weather and in normal traffic flow conditions (i.e. no accidents, detours, construction, etc.). The radar measurements were taken from a parked unmarked vehicle. A specific radar survey ‘spot’ on each roadway segment was chosen based on considerations such as – minimal influence by adjacent intersections or intersection controls, major driveways, crosswalks or railroad crossings, minimal visibility restrictions and no unusual physical constraints (such as parked vehicles, dips, curves, etc.) affecting traffic flow or speed.
• A sample of passing vehicles was randomly selected with careful attention to ensure that the sample represented the entire traffic stream. If several vehicles were in a platoon, only the speed of the first vehicle was recorded. All vehicles traveling at less than 40 mph speed and within 200 feet of the lead vehicle from the lead vehicle were considered to be in platoon. If vehicles were traveling at speeds greater than 40 mph, vehicles less than 350 feet from the lead vehicle were considered to be in platoon. • Radar units were certified and calibrated prior to use. NDS periodically checks their radar gun with a tuning fork to ensure that the device is calibrated and functioning properly. The calibration certificate for radar guns will be included with the final report. The NDS technicians that conducted the speed surveys are certified radar specialists. Data collection was repeated on different days for locations where the originally collected data was determined to be either erroneous or unreliable, or additional data was preferred for purposes of data confirmation/verification.

Appendix Exhibit D contains the radar ‘spot speed’ data collection summary in a graphical histogram format for each of the study segments. The reports include the following key data statistics:
• ‘Range’ refers to the range between the lowest and highest recorded speed in the sample.
• 50th percentile speed refers to the speed at or below which 50 percent of the sampled vehicles were traveling.
• 85th percentile speed refers to the speed at or below which 85 percent of the sampled vehicles were traveling.
• “10 mph pace speed range” refers to the 10 mph speed bandwidth within which the maximum proportion of sampled vehicles were traveling.

2.3 Traffic Count Data Collection
Vehicular traffic count volumes for study segments contained in this report were recorded by NDS in February 2021 and in March-April 2022. The data was collected using hoses or other machines, at approximately the same location where the spot speed surveys were conducted, and typically on the same day the speed surveys were conducted. Bi-directional vehicular traffic counts were recorded at 15-minute intervals continuously over a 24-hour typical weekday period, and summarized. The recorded 24-hour traffic count total was then DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 68 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 9
Final Report
regarded as being representative of average daily traffic (ADT) demand conditions for the study segment for purposes of this study. Appendix Exhibit E contains the raw count data summary, and a graphical summary of the directional hourly volumes by time-of-day for each of the study segments.

The ADT data was mainly used for two purposes in this study:
• As inputs in the computation of actual current collision rates for those study segments where ‘detailed format’ E&TS report is requested.
• For purposes of comparison with relatively older/historical traffic counts (from 2013 through 2019) for the study segments as provided by the City.

The comparison of 2021 ADT data to older ADT data (if available) was completed primarily to obtain a high-level overview of daily traffic demand decreases that may have occurred in recent years and subsequent to the time the City may have last conducted speed surveys.

Note that traffic count data obtained in February-July 2021 may be regarded as “post Covid19” 1 traffic count volumes. A comparative review of ADT counts between 2013 and 2022 indicated that traffic volumes have increased in many of the City’s arterial roadways evaluated in this study, however traffic volumes on residential collectors and downtown streets have either remained relatively unchanged or somewhat decreased. Note however that no special adjustments were made to the 2021/22 counts (or speed or collision data) used in this study to account for Covid-19 impacts, however additional caution was exercised in recommending speed limit changes, especially in situations where prevailing 85 th
percentile speeds were significantly higher than posted speed limits.

2.4 Collision Data Analysis
For segments for which ‘detailed’ format E&TS reports was requested by the City, collision data analysis was completed. For segments using ‘short’ format E&TS reports, note that the collision data was not requested or reviewed in this study.

Collision data from available most recent 3 years were obtained from two sources:
• City Police Department (PD) data as provided by City Public Works staff, • Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) collision data as extracted by Mott MacDonald consultant team.

The total number of collisions and the computed actual collision rates based on SWITRS data is included in the E&TS summary sheets. The SWITRS data based graphical summaries for all study segments are included in Appendix Exhibit F. The City PD datasheets are also included for reference. An “actual” i.e. prevailing collision rate was calculated for each study segment using the following formula:

Collision Rate = (N *1,000,000) / (ADT*L*D*Y)
1 In September 2020, Mott MacDonald had high-level conversations with CA-MUTCD staff at Caltrans Headquarters, as well as Caltrans District 3 staff responsible for speed zones. The feedback received was that there are no specific Caltrans-issued policy or technical guidance on how speed surveys must be conducted or interpreted in the prevailing or post Covid-19 context, however additional technical caution (i.e. looking for significant changes in traffic volume demands, accident rates, etc. that may be reasonably attributable to Covid-19 conditions), and sound engineering judgment is recommended, especially in situations where the 85th percentile speeds are significantly greater than the posted speed limits.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 69 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 10
Final Report
• N = Total Number of collisions (midblock and intersection) within the study segment • Y = Total Number of years that the collision data was reported • ADT = Average Daily Traffic volume (vehicles per day) • L = Length of segment in miles
• D = Number of days in one year (365)
The actual rate (expressed in number of accidents per million vehicle miles per year) was compared to the “average” collision rate that may be reasonably expected to occur on roadways and highways with same/similar characteristics based on statewide data. The statewide average collision rates obtained from Caltrans are summarized in Table 1 for roadway types/cross-sections considered most similar to study facilities in the City of West Sacramento.

Table 1: Statewide Average Accident Rates for Roadway Types

2.5 Field Reviews and ‘Floating Car’ Surveys
In order to evaluate ‘conditions not readily apparent to the driver’, a review of all surveyed roadway segments was conducted to document highway, traffic, and roadside conditions from both field visits and aerial/mapping reviews. These reviews included review of the following:
• Roadside conditions (both physical and functional)
• Type and density of adjacent land uses, including residential uses. • Multimodal safety and potential conflicts with pedestrians, bicyclists, and residential or business districts, and heavy vehicle traffic in industrial areas.

Furthermore, a California-registered Traffic Engineer conducted a field check of study roadway segments, which involved driving each roadway segment during the ‘off-peak’ weekday travel periods, while "floating" with surrounding traffic in order to determine the speed of traffic from the driver's viewpoint.

Roadway Type Average Total Collision Rate
(per Million Vehicle Miles)
Two/three-lane Arterial/Collector (Rural) 0.79
Two/three-lane Arterial/Collector (Urban) 1.44
Four (or more) lanes Undivided Arterial (Statewide) 0.91 Four (or more) lanes Divided Arterial (Statewide) 0.99
Source: 2020 Crash Data on California State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates) DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 70 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 11
Final Report
3 Data Summary & Recommendations

3.1 Data Summary
A written statement for each study roadway segment was prepared and included in Appendix Exhibit C. Each of these segment-specific statements are considered the E&TS report for the subject segment. Each segment’s E&TS report contains a summary listing of the following:
• A high-level schematic map indicating study segment location and limits • Field speed survey data, and speed data statistics
• Average daily traffic count data
• For segments for which ‘detailed’ format E&TS reports was requested by the City, collision data and computed actual collision rates, and comparison to statewide average accident rates for similar facilities were included. For segment using ‘short’ format E&TS reports, note that the collision data was not requested or reviewed. • A brief description of physical/roadside characteristics including adjacent land uses, number of lanes, roadway functional classification, traveled way widths, median types/characteristics, number/frequency of driveways and intersections, bike and pedestrian facilities, railroad crossings, and truck traffic. • Existing and recommended speed limits, and
• An explanation for the recommended speed limit.
• Certification
Table 2 shows a summary of roadway classifications, traffic count data and collision data for study segments. Collision data is only included for detailed E&TS report segments.

Table 2: Roadway Classification, Traffic Count and Collision Data Summary City's
Index
#
Road Segment Name Current General Plan
Roadway Classification Median Type Number of Lanes
Average
Daily
Traffic
(2022)
Length
(mi)
Number of
Collisions
(SWITRS)
01/2018 -
12/2020
Acutal
Accident
Rate
(Acc/MVM)
(SWITRS
Data)
Statewide
Average
Accident
Data
(Acc/MVM)
48 Jefferson Boulevard between Southport
Parkway and City Limits (South).

Medium-High Access
Control Arterial
None, centerline
only 2 1,785 1.2
73 Park Boulevard between Jefferson
Boulevard and Stone Boulevard. Collector Raised Divided Island 2 2,298 1.1 29 10.48 1.44 108 West Capitol Avenue between Enterprise
Boulevard and Northport Drive.

Low Access control
Arterial
Two-way left-turn
median lane 3 6,879 0.8
109 West Capitol Avenue between Northport
Drive and Harbor Boulevard.

Low Access control
Arterial
Two-way left-turn
median lane 3 8,817 0.8
110 West Capitol Avenue between Harbor
Boulevard and Sycamore Street.

Medium-High Access
Control Arterial
Raised Divided
Island 4 13,008 0.6
111 West Capitol Avenue between Sycamore
Street and Jefferson Boulevard.

Medium-High Access
Control Arterial
Raised Divided
Island 4 10,558 0.6
112 West Capitol Avenue between Jefferson
Boulevard and Grand Street.

Medium-High Access
Control Arterial
Raised Divided
Island 4 5,223 0.4
113 West Capitol Avenue between Grand
Street and 5th Street.

Medium-High Access
Control Arterial
Raised Divided
Island 2 10,793 0.3
114 Westacre Road between Michigan Local None, centerline 2 1,717 0.2 23 61.17 1.46 Notes: SWITRS = Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 71 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 12
Final Report

3.2 Speed Limit Recommendations
For each study segment, a recommendation for posted speed limit was developed based on one of the following five scenarios that occurred:

1. Nearest 5-mph increment of 85
th percentile speed matched existing posted limit and
therefore no speed limit change is recommended.

2. A 5 mph reduction from the nearest 5-mph increment 85th percentile speed (justified based on ‘Option 1’ or ‘Option 2’) matched existing posted limit, and therefore no speed limit change is recommended.

3. A 5 mph reduction from the nearest 5-mph increment 85th percentile speed (justified based on ‘Option 1’ or ‘Option 2’) is greater than existing posted limit, and therefore a speed limit change is recommended.

4. A 5 mph reduction from the nearest 5-mph increment 85th percentile speed (justified based on ‘Option 1’ or ‘Option 2’) is greater than existing posted limit, and still considered more than reasonable or safe, and therefore pursuant to CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) as referenced in CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13, the currently posted speed limit (which was established based on a 2013 E&TS previously certified by the City) is recommended to be retained.

5. For residential fronting local streets the existing prima facie speed limit of 25 mph is recommended to be retained per CVC Section 22352(b)(1), if the street meets residential density criteria per CVC Section 627(c)(1) and local street criteria per Section 40802(b)(1).

Table 3 shows a summary of the E&TS data, findings and recommendations for all study segments.

Table 3: E&TS Summary
City's
Index
#
Road Segment Name Survey
Date
Survey
Time
Number
of
Lanes
Length
(mi)
Posted
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Number
of Radar
Sample
Data
10 MPH
Pace
% in
Pace
50%
tile
Speed
(mph)
85%
tile
Speed
(mph)
85% tile
Speed
(mph) -

ROUNDED
Applied
Option
Recomm.

Speed
Limit
(mph)
Speed
Limit
Change
?
48 Jefferson Boulevard b/w
Southport Parkway and
City Limits (South).
4/27/2023 13:00-14:20 2 1.2 55 100 47-56 55% 53 63 65
CVC
22358.8
55 NO
73 Park Boulevard b/w
Jefferson Boulevard and
Stone Boulevard.
4/27/2023 9:00-10:00 2 1.1 25 122 26-35 75% 31 37 35
CVC
22358.8
25 NO
108
West Capitol Avenue b/w
Enterprise Boulevard and
Northport Drive.
4/27/2023 10:25-11:15 3 0.8 40 201 37-46 69% 43 48 50
CVC
22358.8
40 NO
109
West Capitol Avenue b/w
Northport Drive and
Harbor Blvd.
4/27/2023 11:30-12:20 3 0.8 40 206 36-45 80% 41 45 45 1 40 NO 110
West Capitol Avenue b/w
Harbor Boulevard and
Sycamore Street
4/27/2023 14:50-15:40 4 0.6 35 200 36-45 69% 40 46 45
CVC
22358.8
35 NO
111
West Capitol Avenue b/w
Sycamore Street and
Jefferson Boulevard.
4/6/2022 10:35-11:35 4 0.6 35 126 32-41 71% 37 42 40 1 35 NO 112
West Capitol Avenue b/w
Jefferson Boulevard and
Grand Street.
4/7/2022 9:00-10:25 4 0.4 35 110 31-40 76% 35 40 40 1 35 NO 113
West Capitol Avenue b/w
Grand Street and 5th
Street.
4/5/2022 13:30-14:30 2 0.3 35 138 32-41 71% 36 42 40 1 35 NO Notes: "Applied Option" refers to CA-MUTCD, Revision 7, Section 2B.13 defined Options 1 and 2 or CVC Section 22358.8, as described in Report Section 2.1 .

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 72 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 13
Final Report
Table 4 summarizes the segment speed limit recommendations from this study.

Table 4: Summary of Speed Limit Recommendations
City's
Index
#
Road Segment Name
Current
Posted
Speed Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Speed
Limit
Change?
48 Jefferson Boulevard between Southport Parkway and City Limits (South). 55 55 NO 73 Park Boulevard between Jefferson Boulevard and Stone Boulevard. 25 25 NO 108 West Capitol Avenue between Enterprise Boulevard and Northport Drive. 40 40 NO 109 West Capitol Avenue between Northport Drive and Harbor Boulevard. 40 40 NO 110 West Capitol Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Sycamore Street. 35 35 NO 111 West Capitol Avenue between Sycamore Street and Jefferson Boulevard. 35 35 NO 112 West Capitol Avenue between Jefferson Boulevard and Grand Street. 35 35 NO 113 West Capitol Avenue between Grand Street and 5th Street. 35 35 NO DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 73 Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 14
Final Report
Appendix
Appendix Exhibit A – Applicable CVC Sections
Appendix Exhibit B – 2014 CA-MUTCD, Revision 7, Section 2B.13 Appendix Exhibit C – E&TS Summary sheets
Appendix Exhibit D – Radar Spot Speed surveys
Appendix Exhibit E – 24-Hour Traffic Volume Counts & Distribution Appendix Exhibit F – Collision Data Summary
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 74 APPENDIX EXHIBIT A

APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE (CVC) SECTIONS

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY DEFINED
627. (a) "Engineering and traffic survey," as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. (B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B). (2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

Amended Sec. 1, Ch. 45, Stats. 2000. Effective January 1, 2001.

MUTCD AND SPEED LIMITS
21400 (b) The Department of Transportation shall revise the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on January 1, 2012, to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic.

However, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment, but then the Department of Transportation or a local authority shall not reduce the speed limit any further for any reason.

Amended by Stats. 2011, Ch. 528, Sec. 2. Effective January 1, 2012.

BASIC SPEED LAW
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Amended Ch. 252, Stats. 1963. Effective September 20, 1963.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 75 PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS
22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
(1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
(2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
(3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
(1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. (2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority is not required to erect any sign pursuant to this paragraph until donations from private sources covering those costs are received and the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may, however, utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs.

Added Sec. 1, Ch. 420, Stats. 2013. Effective January 1, 2014. 22357.(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 76 (Repealed (in Sec. 28) and added by Stats. 1995, Ch. 766, Sec. 29. Effective January 1, 1996. This section became operative, by its own provisions, on the date described in Section 22366.) DECREASE NEAR CHILDREN’S PLAYSGROUNDS
22357.1. Notwithstanding Section 22357, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, set a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on any street, other than a state highway, adjacent to any children's playground in a public park but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use the facilities. The 25 miles per hour speed limit shall be effective when signs giving notice of the speed limit are posted. Added Ch. 508, Stats. 1989. Effective January 1, 1990. 22358. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, or 25 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366. (Repealed (in Sec. 30) and added by Stats. 1995, Ch. 766, Sec. 31. Effective January 1, 1996. This section became operative, by its own provisions, on the date described in Section 22366.)

DECREASE ON NARROW STREET
22358.3. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

Amended Ch. 1095, Stats. 1972. Effective March 7, 1973. Supersedes Ch. 372. 22358.4. (a) (1) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey.
(2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 77 leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the school zone.
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration.
(5) (A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (B) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from the school grounds.
(D) A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs incurred by the department under this subdivision.
(Amended by Stats. 2007, Ch. 384, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2008.)

DECREASE OF LOCAL LIMITS NEAR SCHOOLS OR SENIOR CENTERS 22358.4. (a) (1) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey.
(2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 78 ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the school zone.
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration.
(5) (A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (C) For purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from the school grounds.
(D) A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs incurred by the department under this subdivision.

Amended Sec. 1, Ch. 384, Stats. 2007. Effective January 1, 2008.

DOWNWARD SPEED ZONING
22358.5. It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 79 would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

Added Ch. 11, Stats. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959.

RETAINING OR RESTORING SPEED LIMIT
22358.8 - Retaining or restoring speed limit
(a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Amended by Stats 2022 ch 406 (AB 1938),s 3, eff. 1/1/2023.

Added by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 8, eff. 1/1/2022.

SPEED TRAPS
40802. (a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of transportation. When a street or road does not appear on the “California Road System Maps,” it may be defined as a “Local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 80 (2) For purposes of this section "school zone" means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone" also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. (c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear; the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D).
(ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406. (D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility. (2) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B) (i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 10 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.

Amended Sec. 49, Ch. 491, Stats. 2010. Effective January 1, 2011.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 81 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 82 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 83 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 84 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 85 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 86 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 87 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 88 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 89 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 90 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 91 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 92 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 93 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 94 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 95 Appendix C
Engineering & Traffic Surveys
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 96 CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Jefferson Boulevard City Index Number: 48 Survey Limits: between Southport Parkway and City Limits (South).

Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 4/27/2023 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 1:00 PM -2:20 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 100
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 63 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 53 MPH Pace Speed: 47 MPH To 56 MPH
In Pace: 55.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 55 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 1,785
Length of Segment (In Feet): 6,336
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type:

Medium-High Access Control
Arterial Center Divider: None, centerline only
Roadway Width: 28' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 55 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 55 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 8/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The high-speed segment runs through a rural residential area entering the south end of the City. No direct driveway access from fronting properties. No sidewalks are present in both directions, no on-street parking.

Comments: Pursuant to CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) as referenced in CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13 , it is recommended that the currently posted 55 mph speed limit (established based on a 2013 E&TS previously certified by City) be retained.

Roadway Geometrics: 28' wide medium-high access control arterial with a centerline only as a divider. No bike lanes or shoulders are present.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 Ryan Teves, PE Senior Civil Engineer 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT 97 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 98 CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: Park Boulevard City Index Number: 73
Survey Limits: Between Jefferson Blvd and Stone Blvd
Direction of Travel: Northbound/Southbound
Survey Date: 4/27/2023 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 09:00 AM-10:00 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 122
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 37 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 31 MPH Pace Speed: 26 MPH To 35 MPH
In Pace: 75.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 2,298
Length of Segment (In Feet): 5,808
C. Collision History
Number of Collisions (SWITRS) [Jan.18-Dec.20]: 29
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM): 10.48
Statewide Avg. Accident
Rate for Comparable Street
(Acc/MVM):

1.44 D. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Major Collector Center Divider: None, striped median left-turn lane Roadway Width: 70 ft # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 25 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 25 MPH Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 08/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Public Works.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: Corridor runs through residential neighborhood, with high frequency of fronting residential driveways, on-street parking, Five foot wide sidewalks adjacent along both directions border residential properties.

Comments: Pursuant to CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) as referenced in CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13, it is recommended that the currently posted 25 mph speed limit (established based on a 2013 E&TS previously certified by City) be retained.

Roadway Geometrics: 70' wide, two lane collector with median turning lane and intermittent landscaped center medians, many marked crosswalks, Corridor contains one signalized intersection and 15 unsignalized intersections. Both directions have six foot wide adjacent bike lanes and 20' wide shoulders bordering residential properties for on-street parking.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014, Revision 7 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Public Works Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 Ryan Teves, PE Senior Civil Engineer 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT 99 DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 100

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: West Capitol Avenue City Index Number: 108 Survey Limits: between Enterprise Boulevard and Northport Drive.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 4/27/2023 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 10:25 AM-11:15 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 201
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 48 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 43 MPH Pace Speed: 37 MPH To 46 MPH
In Pace: 69.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 40 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 6,879
Length of Segment (In Feet): 4,224
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Low Access control Arterial Center Divider: Two-way median left-turn lane Roadway Width: 55' # of lanes: 3
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 40 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 40 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 08/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a commercial-industrial mixed area. Many warehouses with large properties front the roadway.

Gas station uses and commercial areas have driveways with street access.

Comments: Pursuant to CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) as referenced in CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13 , it is recommended that the currently posted 40 mph speed limit (established based on a 2013 E&TS previously certified by City) be retained.

Roadway Geometrics: 55' wide, low access control arterial, with two-way left-turn median lane. Buffered bike lanes and sidewalks present on both sides.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 Senior Civil Engineer 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT Ryan Teves, PE 101
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 102

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: West Capitol Avenue City Index Number: 109 Survey Limits: between Northport Drive and Harbor Boulevard.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 4/27/2023 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 11:30 AM-12:20 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 206
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 45 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 41 MPH Pace Speed: 36 MPH To 45 MPH
In Pace: 80.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 40 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 8,817
Length of Segment (In Feet): 4,224
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type: Low Access control Arterial Center Divider: Two-way median left-turn lane Roadway Width: 55' # of lanes: 3
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 40 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 40 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 08/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a commercial-industrial mixed use area. Many warehouses with large properties front the roadway.

Gas station uses and commercial areas have driveways with street access.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 45 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain posted speed limit of 40 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 55' wide, low access control arterial, with two-way left-turn median divider. Four unsignalized intersections through the corridor are T-intersections. Buffered bike lanes and intermittent sidewalks present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014, Revision 7 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 Ryan Teves, PE Senior Civil Engineer 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT 103

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: West Capitol Avenue City Index Number: 110 Survey Limits: between Harbor Boulevard and Sycamore Street.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 4/27/2023 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 2:50 PM-3:40 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 200
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 46 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 40 MPH Pace Speed: 36 MPH To 45 MPH
In Pace: 69.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 13,008
Length of Segment (In Feet): 3,168
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type:

Medium-High Access Control
Arterial Center Divider: Raised Divided Island
Roadway Width: 75' # of lanes: 4
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 08/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential and commercial mixed use area. A large number of residences and shopping centers front the roadway, and have direct driveway access to the street. 5' wide sidewalks are present in both directions.

Comments: Pursuant to CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) as referenced in CA-MUTCD 2014, Revision 7, Section 2B.13, it is recommended that the currently posted 35 mph speed limit (established based on a 2013 E&TS previously certified by City) be retained.

Roadway Geometrics: 75' wide, medium-high access control arterial, with a raised divided island. Buffered bike lanes present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014, Revision 7 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 Ryan Teves, PE Senior Civil Engineer 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT 104
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 105

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: West Capitol Avenue City Index Number: 111 Survey Limits: between Sycamore Street and Jefferson Boulevard.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 4/6/2022 Survey Day: Wednesday
Survey Time: 10:35-11:35 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 126
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 42 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 37 MPH Pace Speed: 32 MPH To 41 MPH
In Pace: 71.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 10,558
Length of Segment (In Feet): 3,168
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type:

Medium-High Access Control
Arterial Center Divider: Raised Divided Island
Roadway Width: 115' # of lanes: 4
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 8/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a residential and commercial area. A large number of residences and shopping centers front the roadway. All residential and commercial properties have driveways with street access. A 5' wide sidewalk is present in both directions.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 40 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain posted speed limit of 35 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 115' wide, medium-high access control arterial with raised divided median island. Jefferson Boulevard, Westcare Road, and Poplar Ave intersections are signalized. Buffered bike lanes present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 Ryan Teves, PE Senior Civil Engineer 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT 106

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: West Capitol Avenue City Index Number: 112 Survey Limits: between Jefferson Boulevard and Grand Street Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 4/7/2022 Survey Day: Thursday
Survey Time: 9:00-10:25 AM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 110
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 40 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 35 MPH Pace Speed: 31 MPH To 40 MPH
In Pace: 76.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 5,223
Length of Segment (In Feet): 2,112
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type:

Medium-High Access Control
Arterial Center Divider: Raised Divided Island
Roadway Width: 115' # of lanes: 4
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 8/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: The segment runs through a office and commercial area. Adjacent businesses have driveways with direct street access.

Separated sidewalks present in both directions.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 40 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (frequent driveways, and bike/pedestrian considerations).

Recommendation is to retain posted speed limit of 35 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 115' wide, medium-high access control arterial with raised divided island. Bike lanes and sidewalks present in both directions.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT Ryan Teves, PE Senior Civil Engineer 107

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Roadway Surveyed: West Capitol Avenue City Index Number: 113 Survey Limits: between Grand Street and 5th Street.

Direction of Travel: Westbound/Eastbound
Survey Date: 4/5/2022 Survey Day: Tuesday
Survey Time: 1:30-2:30 PM Field Observer: NDS
A. Prevailing Speed Data
# Speed Data Collected: 138
Critical Speed (85th Percentile): 42 MPH 50th Percentile Speed: 36 MPH Pace Speed: 32 MPH To 41 MPH
In Pace: 71.0%
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 10,793
Length of Segment (In Feet): 1,584
C. Roadway Conditions
Roadway Type:

Medium-High Access Control
Arterial Center Divider: Raised Divided Island
Roadway Width: 50' # of lanes: 2
Speed Limit Change? NO
Existing Speed Limit: 35 MPH Recommended Speed Limit: 35 MPH `
Title: Senior Project Manager Date: 8/10/2023
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of West Sacramento Capital Projects and Transportation Department.

Title: Date:

Signed: Ravi Narayanan, PE, TE
Signed:

Factors
Roadside Development: Short segment runs through a residential and commercial area, however there are not too many driveways, sidewalks present in both directions.

Comments: Nearest 5 mph increment of the critical speed is 40 mph. However, a reduction of 5 mph (per Option 1 of Section 2B.13 of CA MUTCD 2014) is recommended based on conditions not readily apparent to the driver (bike/pedestrian considerations). Recommendation is to retain posted speed limit of 35 mph.

Roadway Geometrics: 50-55' wide, medium-high access control arterial with raised medianisland. Bike lanes are not present in either direction.

This survey conforms to Section 627 and 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD 2014 and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

I hear by attest that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original document on file at the Capital Projects and Transportation Department of the City of West Sacramento.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 Ryan Teves, PE Senior Civil Engineer 9/5/2023 | 2:49:46 PM PDT 108
Appendix D

1. Spot Speed Surveys – National Data & Surveying Services (NDS) DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 109
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 55 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 1
36 37
38 1
39 40 1
41 1
42 1
43 1
44 3
45 3
46 1
47 3
48 5
49 4
50 6
51 8
52 7
53 8
54 7
55 5
56 2
57 2
58 3
59 5
60 3
61 62 1
63 5
64 3
65 2
66 3
67 3
68 2
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 35 - 68 53 mph 63 mph 47 - 56 55 55% 13% / 13 32% / 32

SPEED PARAMETERS
SR 84/Jefferson Blvd S/O Southport Pkwy
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
13:00-14:20
4/27/2023
Project #: 23-070092-005
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 110
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 1
24 4
25 3
26 8
27 12
28 8
29 9
30 12
31 12
32 11
33 10
34 5
35 4
36 4
37 4
38 3
39 1
40 2
41 2
42 2
43 2
44 2
45 46 1
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 122 23 - 46 31 mph 37 mph 26 - 35 91 75% 6% / 8 19% / 23

SPEED PARAMETERS
Park Blvd Bet. 16th St & 17th St
City of West Sacramento
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:00
4/27/2023
Project #: 23-070092-001
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 111
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 2
34 4
35 3
36 6
37 12
38 13
39 13
40 11
41 17
42 15
43 13
44 15
45 14
46 15
47 11
48 12
49 8
50 3
51 4
52 4
53 4
54 2
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 201 33 - 54 43 mph 48 mph 37 - 46 138 69% 7% / 15 24% / 48

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Capitol Ave Bet. Enterprise Blvd & Northport Dr
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:25-11:15
4/27/2023
Project #: 23-070092-002
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 112
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32 1
33 3
34 5
35 9
36 13
37 14
38 19
39 18
40 19
41 19
42 17
43 15
44 17
45 13
46 8
47 6
48 3
49 2
50 2
51 1
52 1
53 1
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 206 32 - 53 41 mph 45 mph 36 - 45 164 80% 8% / 18 12% / 24

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Capitol Ave Bet. Northport Dr & Harbor Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:30-12:20
4/27/2023
Project #: 23-070092-003
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 113
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
28 29 1
30 31 2
32 2
33 6
34 8
35 10
36 12
37 13
38 13
39 14
40 18
41 16
42 15
43 14
44 11
45 11
46 6
47 4
48 8
49 5
50 4
51 3
52 3
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 200 27 - 52 40 mph 46 mph 36 - 45 137 69% 15% / 30 17% / 33

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Capltol Ave Bet. Harbor Blvd & Sycamore Ave
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
14:50-15:40
4/27/2023
Project #: 23-070092-004
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 114
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 2
26 1
27 28 2
29 2
30 3
31 3
32 9
33 7
34 8
35 14
36 9
37 6
38 12
39 10
40 9
41 5
42 6
43 3
44 1
45 3
46 3
47 3
48 1
49 2
50 1
51 1
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 126 25 - 51 37 mph 42 mph 32 - 41 89 71% 10% / 13 20% / 24

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Capitol Ave Bet. Sycamore St & Jefferson Blvd
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:35-11:35
4/6/2022
Project #: 22-070044-066
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 115
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 1
28 6
29 2
30 3
31 5
32 12
33 9
34 6
35 13
36 11
37 6
38 7
39 8
40 7
41 2
42 5
43 2
44 2
45 1
46 1
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 110 26 - 46 35 mph 40 mph 31 - 40 84 76% 11% / 13 12% / 13

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Capitol Ave Bet. Jefferson Blvd & Grand St
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:25
4/7/2022
Project #: 22-070044-067
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 116
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 1
27 1
28 3
29 30 6
31 4
32 10
33 6
34 9
35 17
36 11
37 11
38 13
39 5
40 11
41 5
42 5
43 8
44 8
45 1
46 47 1
48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 138 25 - 48 36 mph 42 mph 32 - 41 98 71% 11% / 16 18% / 24

SPEED PARAMETERS
Tower Bridge Gateway Bet. Grand St & 3rd St
City of West Sacramento
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:30-14:30
4/5/2022
Project #: 22-070044-068
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 117
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 118
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 119
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 120
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 121
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 122
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 123
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 124
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 125
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 126
Appendix Exhibit F

1. SWITRS Data Graphic: January 2018 – December 2020

2. West Sacramento Police Department Collision Data: January 2018 – December 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 127
Appendix Exhibit F

1. SWITRS Data Graphic: January 2018 – December 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 128
73: Park Boulevard between Jefferson Boulevard and Stone Boulevard Data: West Sacramento Police Department, January 2018 – December 2020. 25 reported collisions. 24%
20%
16%
12%
8%
8%
8%
4%
Cause of Collision
improper turning (6)unsafe speed (5)driving under influence (4)auto r/w violation (3) traffic signals and signs (2)unsafe starting/backing (2)wrong side of road (2) other hazardous movement (1)
32%
24%
24%
16%
4%
Collision Type
hit object (8)
broadside (6)rear-end (6)
sideswipe (4)head-on (1)
0123456
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0
2 6
1 2
1 3
1 0
3 1
Number of Collisions in 3 Years
Time of Day of Collisions over 3 Year Period
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 129
Appendix Exhibit F

2. West Sacramento Police Department Collision Data: January 2018 – December 2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 130
Collision Summary Report
City of West Sacramento
Police Department
3/5/21
From 1/1/2018 to 1/1/2021Total Collisions: 25Injury Collisions: 9Fatal Collisions: 0PARK BLVD Page 1 of 418‐00843 2/8/2018 22:37 Thursday Rear‐End Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Driving Under Influence
0' Direction: Not Stated
23152A Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Not Stated
Male Age: 41
Assoc Factor: Violation
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HBD Under Influence
Party 1 Driver North 1998 MERCURY VILLAGER Mini Van No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Not Stated
Female Age: 34
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Stopped In Road
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver North 2014 FORD FOCUS Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 18‐01077 2/20/2018 15:35 Tuesday
Broadside Other Motor Vehicle
PARK BLVD ‐ FALLBROOK ST
Other Hazardous Movement
0' Direction: Not Stated
21803A Hit & Run: No Complaint of Pain # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 47
Assoc Factor: Other
Making Right Turn
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver East 2015 MITSUBISHI MIRAGE Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 27
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2003 FORD FOCUS Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain 18‐02858 5/24/2018 16:01 Thursday
Broadside Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Auto R/W Violation
0' Direction: Not Stated
21804A Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 20
Assoc Factor: Vision Obscureme
Entering Traffic
Veh Type: Pickup Truck Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2000 FORD RANGER Pickups & Panels No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 18
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2002 HONDA ACCORD Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 18‐04437 8/10/2018 Friday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ LAKEWOOD DR
Improper Turning
160' Direction: South
22107 Hit & Run: Misde Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Not Stated
Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Ran Off Road
Veh Type: Other Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Driver West Unknown Hit and Run Vehicle Involvem No Injury 18‐05032 9/7/2018 12:07 Friday
Broadside Bicycle
PARK BLVD ‐ STONE BLVD
Improper Turning
300' Direction: North
22107 Hit & Run: Misde Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
M/C Helmet Driver ‐ No Not Stated
Male Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Making Left Turn
Veh Type: Bicycle Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Bicyclist South BICYCLE Bicycle No Injury
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 21
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver North 2017 NISSAN ALTIMA Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 18‐06171 11/5/2018 15:12 Monday
Broadside Other Motor Vehicle
PARK BLVD ‐ ALAMEDA BLVD
Improper Turning
114' Direction: South
22107 Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 48
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Making U Turn
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2004 CHEVROLET TAHOE Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 131
PARK BLVD Page 2 of 4
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 20
Assoc Factor:

Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2007 TOYOTA MATRIX Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 18‐07193 12/31/2018 15:52 Monday
Rear‐End Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Unsafe Speed
0' Direction: Not Stated
22350 Hit & Run: Misde Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Not Stated
Male Age:

Assoc Factor: None Stated
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Driver South 2008 JEEP WRANGLER Sport Utility Vehicle No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Not Stated
Male Age: 29
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Stopped In Road
Veh Type: Passenger Car Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2017 GMC YUKON Sport Utility Vehicle No Injury 19‐01636 3/22/2019 14:30 Friday
Broadside Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Traffic Signals and Signs
0' Direction: Not Stated
21453(a) Hit & Run: Felony Complaint of Pain # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 Daylight Raining Pty at Fault:1
Not Stated
Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Driver West Sport Utility Vehicle No Injury
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 54
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2013 LEXUS ES Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain 19‐03213 6/3/2019 15:34 Monday
Rear‐End Parked Motor Vehicle
PARK BLVD ‐ WEBSTER ST
Unsafe Starting or Backing
200' Direction: South
22106 Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Unknown
Male Age: 56
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Backing
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver West 1996 CHEVROLET 1500 Pickups & Panels No Injury Not Stated
Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Parked
Veh Type: Sobriety: Not Applicable
Party 2 Parked Vehicle South CUSTOM RADAR TRAILER Mobile Equipment No Injury 19‐04362 7/25/2019 15:31 Thursday
Sideswipe Other Motor Vehicle
PARK BLVD ‐ WESTACRE RD
Driving Under Influence
0' Direction: Not Stated
23152A Hit & Run: Misde Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 43
Assoc Factor: Violation
Making Right Turn
Veh Type: Sobriety: HBD Under Influence
Party 1 Driver East 2006 FORD MUSTANG Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 33
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Stopped In Road
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver North 2016 HONDA HR‐V Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 19‐06653 11/7/2019 20:18 Thursday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ FALLBROOK ST
Driving Under Influence
0' Direction: Not Stated
23152A Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Not Us Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 40
Assoc Factor: Violation
Ran Off Road
Veh Type: Sobriety: HBD Under Influence
Party 1 Driver West 2013 TOYOTA AVALON Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 19‐07518 12/18/2019 19:50 Wednesday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ FALLBROOK ST
Improper Turning
0' Direction: Not Stated
21651A1 Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ No Street  Raining Pty at Fault:1
Lap Belt Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 40
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2016 FORD CMAX Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 20‐00143 1/8/2020 18:32 Wednesday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ FALLBROOK ST
Wrong Side of Road
0' Direction: Not Stated
21650 Hit & Run: No Complaint of Pain # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 64
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Ran Off Road
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2005 LEXUS RX Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain 20‐00665 2/6/2020 19:42 Thursday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ FALLBROOK ST
Wrong Side of Road
0' Direction: Not Stated
21651(a)(1) Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 132
PARK BLVD Page 3 of 4
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 21
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2012 CHEVROLET MALIBU Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 20‐02173 5/8/2020 19:39 Friday
Broadside Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Auto R/W Violation
0' Direction: Not Stated
21804A Hit & Run: No Complaint of Pain # Inj: 2 # Killed: 0 Dusk ‐ Dawn Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 24
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Entering Traffic
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2017 HONDA CIVIC Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 39
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2018 TESLA MODEL S Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain 20‐02258 5/14/2020 15:18 Thursday
Sideswipe Other Motor Vehicle
PARK BLVD ‐ 15TH ST
Auto R/W Violation
0' Direction: Not Stated
21800C Hit & Run: No Complaint of Pain # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 22
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver North 2017 KIA OPTIMA Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 20
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver East 2009 CHEVROLET COBALT Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain 20‐02779 6/6/2020 22:47 Saturday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ 15TH ST
Improper Turning
0' Direction: Not Stated
22107 Hit & Run: Misde Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Not Stated Cell Phone Not In Use
Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Other Unsafe Turning
Veh Type: Sobriety: HBD Impairment Un
Party 1 Driver No Injury
20‐02911 6/25/2020 12:38 Thursday
Sideswipe Other Object
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Unsafe Starting or Backing
0' Direction: Not Stated
22106 Hit & Run: Felony Other Visible Injury # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Not Stated
Male Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Driver South HONDA Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury M/C Helmet Driver ‐ Yes
Male Age: 66
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Stopped In Road
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2019 HARLEY DAVIDS CRUISING Motorcycle Other Visible Injury 20‐03552 8/1/2020 14:51 Saturday
Rear‐End Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Unsafe Speed
0' Direction: Not Stated
22350 Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used
Female Age: 29
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2017 HONDA CIVIC Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used
Female Age: 55
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Stopped In Road
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2015 HONDA FIT Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 20‐03764 8/12/2020 23:40 Wednesday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ 16TH ST
Driving Under Influence
5' Direction: North
23152(a) Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used
Female Age: 23
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HBD Under Influence
Party 1 Driver East 2005 FORD FOCUS Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 20‐04170 9/2/2020 17:58 Wednesday
Head‐On Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Traffic Signals and Signs
0' Direction: Not Stated
21453(a) Hit & Run: No Complaint of Pain # Inj: 2 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used
Female Age: 65
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver North 2015 GMC ACADIA Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain Lap/Shoulder Harness Used
Male Age: 26
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Making Left Turn
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver West 2013 FORD FOCUS Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 133
PARK BLVD Page 4 of 4
20‐04518 9/21/2020 22:21 Monday
Hit Object Fixed Object
PARK BLVD ‐ FALLBROOK ST
Unsafe Speed
0' Direction: Not Stated
22350 Hit & Run: No Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 41
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 1 Driver South 2020 NISSAN VERSA Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 20‐04580 9/24/2020 17:10 Thursday
Rear‐End Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Unsafe Speed
0' Direction: Not Stated
22350 Hit & Run: Felony Complaint of Pain # Inj: 2 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Not Stated
Male Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Driver North Pickups & Panels No Injury
Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 27
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Stopped In Road
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver North 2003 HONDA CRV Sport Utility Vehicle Complaint of Pain 20‐06251 12/23/2020 04:22 Wednesday
Sideswipe Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Improper Turning
0' Direction: Not Stated
22107 Hit & Run: Misde Property Damage Only # Inj: 0 # Killed: 0 Dark ‐ Street Ligh Clear Pty at Fault:1
Not Stated Cell Phone Not In Use
Age:

Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Making Left Turn
Veh Type: Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Driver South 2005 FORD EXPEDITION Sport Utility Vehicle No Injury Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 38
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Making Left Turn
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver West 2014 HONDA ACCORD Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury 20‐06282 12/24/2020 12:22 Thursday
Rear‐End Other Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON BLVD ‐ PARK BLVD
Unsafe Speed
0' Direction: Not Stated
22350 Hit & Run: Felony Complaint of Pain # Inj: 1 # Killed: 0 Daylight Clear Pty at Fault:1
Unknown Cell Phone Not In Use
Male Age: 60
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Proceeding Straight
Veh Type: Sobriety: Impairment Not Kno
Party 1 Driver South 2009 KIA RIO Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep Complaint of Pain Lap/Shoulder Harness Used Cell Phone Not In Use
Female Age: 35
Assoc Factor: None Apparent
Stopped In Road
Veh Type: Sobriety: HNBD
Party 2 Driver South 2016 ACURA MDX Passenger Car, Station Wagon, Jeep No Injury Settings for Query:

Street: PARK BLVDNote that when a street is selected, the results return all collisions with that steet as a primary road and all collisions with that street as a secondary road with a distance of 0'.

Sorted By: Date and Time
DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 134
Mott MacDonald | Engineering & Traffic Surveys 15
Final Report
mottmac.com

DocuSign Envelope ID: 080A0E64-CF72-449B-AC5A-8827B91266E1 135

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 1, 2023 ITEM # 6
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT 8 FOR THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH WOOD RODGERS, INC. FOR THE RIVERFRONT STREET EXTENSION AND 5TH STREET WIDENING PROJECT (CIP 15032) INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Christian Asuncion, Associate Civil Engineer
Capital Projects Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to approve Amendment 8 of the professional services contract with Wood Rodgers, Inc. for design and engineering support services through the construction phase of the Riverfront Street Extension and 5th Street Widening Project (CIP 15032).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1) Approve Amendment 8 of the contract for professional services with Wood Rodgers, Inc. to extend the term of the contract until June 30, 2024;
2) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment 8 with Wood Rodgers, Inc.; 3) Authorize the City Manager to execute non-substantive changes or modifications, with approval from the City Attorney; and
4) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute amendments to further extend the term of the contract, if necessary.

BACKGROUND
In February 2017, the City awarded a professional services contract to Wood Rodgers, Inc. to prepare environmental documentation, engineering plans, specifications, estimates and provide right-of-way services for the Riverfront Street Extension.

On November 27, 2019, the contract was revised by Amendment 1 to extend the term of the contract until December 30, 2020. Amendment 2 to the contract for the professional engineering services was made on January 27, 2020, to include additional environmental and geotechnical services as well as the supplemental drainage analysis. The compensation for these additional services was approved by the City Manager and paid out of the project contingency in the amount of $84,975 as previously approved by the City Council.

Amendment 3 to the contract was made on January 20, 2021, to complete the project Plans, Specifications, & Estimates (PS&E) and provide a proper level of support during bidding and construction. The compensation for these additional services was approved by the City Council in the amount of $156,015.37. Amendment 4 to the contract was made on February 22, 2022, to reallocate $63,746.57 from Construction Staking to other tasks to complete PS&E, further provide bidding and construction support, and for Monument Right of Way to update the Temporary Construction Easement (TCE) and Permit to Enter & Construct (PTE&C). The contract term was also extended to December 31, 2023. Amendment 5 to the contract was made on June 15, 2022, to continue construction support, design and coordination with Fulcrum Properties for wet utilities connection, and curb cuts design for future parking lots. The compensation was approved by the City Council in the amount of $108,850.56.

Amendment No. 6 was made on October 19, 2022, to continue providing construction support and subcontracted ECORP Consulting, Inc. and Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation for providing archaeological support and on-site monitoring. The compensation for these additional services was approved by the City Council in the amount of $295,000.00. Amendment No. 7 was made on September 25, 2023, to authorize previously approved contingency in the amount of $25,000.00 in order to complete construction support through the end of construction and to provide construction close-out services.

ANALYSIS
The Riverfront Extension and 5th St Widening project is scheduled to be completed by Winter 2023. The remaining work for Wood Rodgers, Inc. includes construction support through the end of construction and to provide construction close-out services. For Wood Rodgers, Inc. to complete these tasks, the term of the contract needs to be extended to June 30, 2024. 136
Contract Amendment 8 with Wood Rodgers, Inc.

November 1, 2023

Environmental Considerations
The City examined potential environmental impacts associated with the Project. Pursuant to both the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), all the required environmental research and analyses have been performed including environmental surveys, resource agency coordination, and public outreach. The City Council certified the CEQA environmental documents on November 6, 2019, with Resolution 19-97. Caltrans approved the NEPA Categorical Exclusion on January 16, 2020.

Commission Recommendations
N/A
Strategic Plan Integration
N/A
Alternatives
The following alternatives are available to the City Council:
1) Approve the recommended actions as stated above.
2) The City Council could choose to make adjustments to the recommended actions. 3) The City Council could choose to decline the recommended actions or cancel the project.

Alternatives 2 and 3 are not recommended as this is a grant-funded project with a tight delivery schedule. Any changes or modifications to the scope of the Project or the documents required to move the Project forward will impact the funding and overall project schedule.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Capital Projects Department in coordination with and review by the Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
There is no budget or cost impact with this amendment as this is only a contract term extension.

ATTACHMENT
1) Contract Amendment No. 8 for Professional Services with Wood Rodgers Inc. 137
Attachment 1
Wood Rodgers, Inc.

MC20-104 Riverfront Street Extension
Expires 6/30/2024
AMENDMENT NO. 8
to the

CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
between the

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
And
Wood Rodgers, Inc.

Dated February 15, 2017
This Amendment No. 8 to the Contract for Services between the City of West Sacramento (City) and Wood Rodgers, Inc. (Consultant) dated February 15, 2017 for the Riverfront Street Extension and 5th Street Widening Project, is made and entered into this 1st day of November 2023. Except as expressly amended herein, the February 15, 2017 Contract for Services is in full force and effect.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, in February 2017, the City awarded a professional services contract to Wood Rodgers, Inc. to prepare environmental documentation, engineering plans, specifications, estimates and provide right-of-way services for the Riverfront Street Extension in the amount of $849,747.34; and
WHEREAS, in November 2017, the City Council authorized staff to modify the footprint of the Riverfront Extension project and add 5th Street widening to the scope in order to defer the intersection improvements associated with the Broadway Bridge Alternatives analysis; and WHEREAS, per the revised scope of work the Riverfront Street Extension and 5th Street Widening Project (“Project”) will widen 5th Street from 15th Street to Bridge Street, extend Riverfront Street 900 feet south from Mill Street, and include sewer, water and storm drainage improvements; and underground overhead utilities on the east side of 5th Street between 15th Street and Business 80; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 was executed November 27, 2019 to extend the term of the contract until December 30, 2020; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 was made on January 27, 2020 to include additional environmental and geotechnical services as well as the supplemental drainage analysis. The compensation for these additional services was approved by the City Manager and paid out of the project contingency in the amount of $84,975 as previously approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 3 was made on January 20, 2021 to include finalizing the project Plans, Specifications, & Estimates (PS&E) and providing construction support. The compensation for these additional services was approved by the City Council in the amount of $156,015.37; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 4 was made on February 22, 2022 to reallocate $63,746.57 from Construction Staking to other tasks to complete the PS&E, provide bidding and construction support, and for Monument Right of Way to update the Temporary Construction Easements (TCE) and Permit to Enter and Construct (PTEC). The contract term was also extended to December 31, 2023; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 5 was made on June 15, 2022 to continue construction support, include design and coordination with Fulcrum Properties for wet utilities connection, and curb cuts design for future parking lots. The compensation for these additional services was approved by the City Council in the amount of $108,850.56; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 6 was made on October 19, 2022 to continue providing construction support and subcontracted ECORP Consulting, Inc. and Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation for providing archaeological support and on-site monitoring. The compensation for these additional services was approved by the City Council in the amount of $295,000.00; and 138
Wood Rodgers, Inc.

MC20-104 Riverfront Street Extension
Expires 6/30/2024
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 7 was made on September 25, 2023 to authorize previously approved contingency in the amount of $25,000.00 in order to complete construction support and project close out.; and
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant desire to amend said contract; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by parties hereto to amend said agreement as follows:

I. TERM OF CONTRACT:

The Term of the Contract is hereby extended to June 30, 2024.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 7 as the date herein set forth.

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
By:

Aaron Laurel, City Manager
WOOD RODGERS, INC.

By:

Mark Rayback, President

APPROVED AS TO FORM
By:

Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By: ________________________________________________________ Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
139

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 1, 2023 ITEM # 7
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 WITH GHD, INC. FOR THE

SACRAMENTO AVENUE COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP 10048) FOR AWARD OF GREEN MEANS GO GRANT
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Stephanie Chhan, Senior Transportation Planner
Community Development Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [ X ] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to approve Contract Amendment No. 1 to the professional services contract with GHD, Inc. for the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan (CIP 10048).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1) Approve and authorize the City Manager, or their designee, to execute Contract Amendment No. 1 to the professional services contract with GHD, Inc.; and
2) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the contract with GHD, Inc. with approval from the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND
Through the 2021 SACOG Funding Round - Community Design Funding Program – Non-Competitive Funding Category, the City was awarded $273,000 in Regional Surface Transportation Program funds, with a commitment of $35,371 of local matching funds, to develop the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan. The project area is located between Harbor Boulevard near the I-80 Corridor and the approach to the planned I Street Bridge Replacement (C Street/Railyards Bridge) across the Sacramento River.

The purpose of the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan is to articulate the current challenges on the corridor and recommend achievable solutions to implement a cohesive, comprehensive vision.

The Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan will present an overview of the project purpose and corridor area, summarize related planning efforts, prescribe community engagement opportunities to inform this plan and future projects, and provide a vision statement and supporting goals that guide the development, evaluation, and implementation of recommended corridor improvements.

On October 19, 2022, the City Council awarded a professional services contract to GHD, Inc. for the development of the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan. Along with this award, staff and GHD identified an opportunity to submit a grant application to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) for the Green Means Go Category B: Planning grant. City Council authorized staff to submit a grant application for the Green Means Go funding program and to return to Council with a contract amendment with GHD, Inc. should SACOG award the City funding for the Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs, and Financing Plan.

ANALYSIS
In March 2023, SACOG awarded the City $650,000 for the Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs, and Financing Plan. Over the past six months, City staff has been coordinating with SACOG on executing a Memorandum of Understanding for the Green Means Go grant and with GHD to finalize the scope for the Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs, and Financing Plan.

The Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs, and Financing Plan will identify nontransportation utility improvements needed to accommodate and encourage infill housing production along the corridor, increase climate resilience, and improve housing affordability by identifying improvement financing mechanisms.
140
Sacramento Avenue - GHD, Inc. Amendment No. 1
November 1, 2023

Environmental Considerations
The contract amendment is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no environmental review is required for this action.

Commission Recommendation
This is an administrative item and does not have new policy implications that would require Transportation, Mobility, and Infrastructure Commission input. As such, this item was not presented to the TMI Commission however an update on its status of the project was last presented to the TMI Commission on February 6, 2023.

Staff will return to the Commission and Council with updates throughout the development of the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan, such as confirmation of the project prioritization criteria and feedback on the draft and final plan prior to adoption by the City Council.

Strategic Plan Integration
This project advances the 2023 Strategic Plan “Inclusive and Diverse” strategic principle and the Management Agenda item “Equitable Investment Strategy/Program.”
Alternatives
Following are the City Council’s primary action alternatives:
1) Approve the recommended actions as stated above; or
2) Modify or defer the recommended actions; or
3) Not approve the recommended action or delete the project.

Alternative 1 is recommended to leverage external funding from the Green Means Go grant to complete the Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs, and Financing Plan in alignment with the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan. Alternative 2 is not recommended as it may require coordination with SACOG to amend the Green Means Go Memorandum of Understanding for Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs, and Financing Plan. Alternative 3 is not recommended as the City may lose external leveraged funds.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Community Development Department in coordination with and review by the Capital Projects Department and Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
The City was awarded $273,000 in Regional Surface Transportation Program funds, with a commitment of $35,371 of local matching funds through the 2021 SACOG Funding Round - Community Design Funding Program. This project was appropriated to the FY 2021-22 Capital Improvement Project budget as approved by Council via Resolution 21-49 for a total appropriation of $35,330 of Measure N – Community Improvements Funds. On October 19, 2022, City Council approved Resolution 22-129 authorizing the transfer of $24,129 from the Measure N (Fund 111) to support the contract contingency and staff time.

As the City was notified of the Green Means Go grant awards in March 2023, the $650,000 Green Means Go grant award has been included in the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan (CIP 10048) the Fiscal Year 2023-2025 Budget adopted by City Council on June 28, 2023 through Resolution 23-57.

As such, there is no impact to the budget.

PROJECT REVENUES
2021 SACOG Funding Round - Community Design Funding Program $273,000 Measure N – Community Improvements $59,500
2023 SACOG Green Means Go Funding Program $650,000
Total Revenues $982,500

PROJECT COSTS
Negotiated Professional Services Contact with GHD, Inc. $275,000 Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Contract with GHD, Inc. $620,077 Estimated Staff and Resources Cost for Community Design Funding Program $30,000 141
Sacramento Avenue - GHD, Inc. Amendment No. 1
November 1, 2023

Estimated Staff and Resources Cost for Green Means Go Funding Program $35,000 Remaining Project Contingency $22,423
Total Project Cost $982,500
PROJECT SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0

ATTACHMENT
1) Contract Amendment No. 1 with GHD, Inc.
142
GHD, Inc
CDD22-305 Sacramento Ave CS Corridor Improvement Plan
Expires 6/30/26
AMENDMENT NO. 1
to the

CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
between the

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
and
GHD
Dated November 1, 2022
This Amendment No. 1 to the Contract for Services between the City of West Sacramento and GHD, Inc. dated November 1, 2022, is made and entered into this 1st day of November, 2023. Except as expressly amended herein, the November 1, 2022 Contract for Services is in full force and effect.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, on October 19, 2022, the City of West Sacramento (“City”) City Council awarded a contract to GHD, Inc. (“Consultant”) for a Contract for Services to complete the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, in March 2023, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments awarded the City a Green Means Go grant for the Sacramento Avenue Infill and Infrastructure Capacity, Needs, and Financing Plan; and;
WHEREAS, the City desires that the Consultant provide consultant services to complete the Sacramento Avenue Infill and Infrastructure Capacity, Needs, and Financing Plan in alignment with the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, additional time and compensation is needed for the Contract of Services to complete the project; and
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant desire to amend said contract.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by parties hereto to amend said agreement as follows:

I. SCOPE:

The Scope as set forth in the Contract for Services dated November 1, 2022, shall be revised to include Exhibit A Consultant Proposal/Scope of Work to include Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs And Financing Plan Scope of Services.

II. COMPENSATION:

The compensation as set forth in the Contract for Services dated November 1, 2022 shall be revised to include Exhibit A Table 1: Fee Proposal to Complete Green Means Go - Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs And Financing Plan.

Compensation shall be increased by Six Hundred Twenty Thousand Seventy-Seven Dollars ($620,077), but in no event shall total compensation exceed Eight Hundred NinetyFive Thousand Seventy-Seven dollars ($895,077), without City’s prior written approval.

III. TERM:

The term set forth in the Contract for Services dated November 1, 2022, shall be revised to terminate on June 30, 2026.

Attachment 1
143
GHD, Inc
CDD22-305 Sacramento Ave CS Corridor Improvement Plan
Expires 6/30/26
IV. TERMINATION:

Section 4 Termination, Subsection A as set forth in the Contract for Services dated November 1, 2022, shall be revised to the following:

A. This Contract may be terminated by either party, provided that the other party is given not less than 10 calendar days’ written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate.

V. MISCELLANEOUS
This Contract is funded in whole in part through grant funds received under the following grants: Sacramento Area Council of Government’s Community Design Grant (Funded by Regional Surface Transportation Program; Program Supplement No F032 signed March 2, 2022) and Sacramento Area Council of Government’s Green Means Go Grant (Funded by Regional Early Action Planning Grants Program of 2021 [“REAP 2.0”], Memorandum of Understanding signed October XX, 2023) (the “Grants”), the terms of which are incorporated herein. Copies of the Grants and any related materials are included as Exhibit B and have been made available to Consultant, and Consultant shall ensure that its performance under this Contract, and that of any subcontractors, conforms to the requirements of the Grants.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as the date herein set forth.

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
By:

Aaron Laurel, City Manager
GHD, Inc.

By:

Kamesh Vedula, GHD Principal

APPROVED AS TO FORM
By:

Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By: ________________________________________________________ Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk 144
943 Reserve Drive
Roseville, California 95678
United States
www.ghd.com
The Power of Commitment
GHD
October 06, 2023
Stephanie Chhan
City of West Sacramento
111o West Capitol Avenue, 2nd Floor
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs And Financing Plan Stephanie:

GHD is pleased to provide this proposal for professional services for the planning study for infrastructure improvements along the Sacramento Avenue corridor in West Sacramento, CA. We will be assisted with this work with WRT, our subconsultant on the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan. We will also be supported by our survey subconsultant, Chaudhary Associates, and our utility locating contractor, Badger Daylighting. After this scope of work is completed, we would be happy to discuss any additional work that might be required.

Regards
Todd Tregenza
Project Manager
916-245-4216
[email protected]
145
West Sacramento Proposal | Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs And Financing Plan 2 Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs And Financing Plan Scope of Services
The following tasks define our scope of services.

Task 1 – Project Management
GHD will send monthly invoices and progress reports to the City. Additional management effort, including meeting attendance, QA/QC, and team coordination, is included in each of the tasks below.

Task 1 Deliverables
• Monthly progress reports and invoices
Task 2 – Zoning and Planning Updates
WRT, as part of the GHD team, will lead Task 2. GHD will support with workshop attendance.

2.A Task Management, QA/QC, Meetings
This task includes management and coordination of the work below, including subconsultants. This task includes meetings with City staff and QA/QC of deliverables.

2. B: Background Review
WRT will review background documents including the City’s General Plan, Washington Specific Plan (if needed), Mobility Action Plan, Current Zoning Code, and most recent (within last five years) built projects and development proposals.

2. C: Evaluation of Current Development Standards along the corridor and Recommendations If needed, will evaluate the development standards in Washington Specific Plan and the current zoning code for zoning districts along the corridor to determine if they promote a diversity of housing options, achieve target densities, and whether they achieve the desired scale, character, and placemaking strategies appropriate for a multi-modal complete corridor.

To clarify needed actions, we will determine which standards, guidelines, and procedures are objective (independently verifiable) and which are subjective guidelines (open to interpretation). To compare standards across districts, tables will summarize allowable uses, building envelope (setbacks, step-backs, & height), residential density, floor area ratios, and parking ratios. We will also distinguish between subjective guidelines that be easily rewritten to be objective, versus subjective guidelines that require interpretation by City staff or a decision-making body.

We will prepare a memo summarizing the findings of the evaluation of standards, barriers to infill development, and recommend updates to the standards. The memo will be accompanied by graphic illustrations and precedent images showing massing, entry orientation, and parking configurations illustrate. A total of two studies on up to four representative sites each are budgeted.

2.C Deliverables:
• Summary memo with evaluation of current standards, and recommendations for code updates.

2. D: Draft Updates to Standards / Objective Development and Design Standards (ODDS) Technical Memorandum
WRT will discuss with staff the best approach to incorporate updates to the existing development and design standards, i.e. revisions to existing standards in a red-lined format, or a separate document with revised standards.
146
West Sacramento Proposal | Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs And Financing Plan 3 Development and Design Standards that may be included, but not limited to, are:
o District-Specific Standards: allowable use, residential density, floor area ratio, building envelope (height & setback), parking ratios, building types, and streets with ground-floor commercial frontage required/allowed. o Building Design Standards: commercial and residential street frontage, building entry and transparency (window area), massing increments, façade elements & articulation, block size limitations (for large sites), exterior finishes, cornice & roof form, and requirements specific to building types, etc. o Site Design Standards: landscaping, vehicle ingress/egress, private & semi-private opens space, privatelyowned public open space (for larger projects), paseos & plazas, walls & fences, etc. o Public Right-of-Way Improvements by Developers: sidewalk improvements, street trees, light standards, etc. These recommendations will be provided in CAD and PDF format for ease of incorporation into City Standards.
o Parking & TDM: Recommended parking ratios, TDM requirements, and integration of micro-mobility infrastructure within new development.

Where necessary, we will include graphic illustrations and precedent images to illustrate revised development and design standards. We will prepare 3D representation of select locations along Sacramento Avenue corridor, to illustrate the strategies for corridor activation, placemaking and community vitality through land use, urban form, ground floor programming and treatment, transportation and mobility enhancements, landscaping, and streetscape elements.

2.D Deliverables:
• Draft updates to Standards Memorandum for staff review.

2. E: Administrative Draft Technical Memorandum
The administrative draft will address staff comments on the previous draft. The administrative draft is for review by project staff, the City Attorney, public works department, and other interested departments. For the Administrative Draft, graphics will be provided as a separate attachment. City staff will be responsible for providing our team with a single consistent set of comments.

2.E Deliverables:
• Draft narrative using “track changes” and footnotes to reference source, “clean” administrative draft, Washington Specific Plan administrative draft using “track changes” and footnotes, and “clean” Specific Plan ODDS administrative draft.
• City Clarifications and Final Direction. After we have had an opportunity to review City comments and list concerns, WRT will meet with representatives from interested departments and the City Attorney.

2.F: Public Review Draft Technical Memorandum
Word Draft. WRT will revise ODDS to address City comments and clarifications. These will first be provided in Word. Staff will return this draft with edits and comments.

2.F Deliverable: Word version of public review draft.
o Check Print Draft. After comments are received in Word, WRT will address edits to text and graphics.

We will provide City staff with a check print draft to provide the City with a final opportunity for revision. o Public Review Draft Document. WRT will make final refinements. The public review draft will be provided in two PDF files (for viewing on the web and for printing). Word, and image files will also be provided. This will be circulated as an appendix to the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Plan.

2.G: Community Pop-Up Workshop
147
West Sacramento Proposal | Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs And Financing Plan 4 WRT and GHD will organize and attend one community pop-up workshop and contribute relevant content to present recommended code updates.

2.H: Planning Commission and City Council Study Sessions WRT and GHD will attend one study session each, with Planning Commission and City Council to present draft code updates. Because this work will serve as an appendix to the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Corridor Plan, these meetings will be coordinated with meetings being held on that plan.

2.I: Public Hearings
WRT and GHD will attend one public hearing each, with Planning Commission and City Council to present final code updates. Because this work will serve as an appendix to the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Corridor Plan, these meetings will be coordinated with meetings being held on that plan.

2.J: Preparation of Development Forecasts
GHD and WRT will prepare two sets of development forecasts for the study corridor. These will be used to inform the needs assessments in Tasks 3, 4, and 5. The nature of the forecasts will be determined in consultation but may included, for example, a “status quo” development forecast based on existing conditions and regulations, and an “accelerated” development forecast based on policies and programs developed to incentivize the production of affordable housing along the corridor. These forecasts will be consistent with the City’s Housing Element and General Plan.

Task 3 – Sewer, Water, and Stormwater Existing Utility Database, Conditions Assessment, and Utility Needs Assessment
This task includes the effort to perform the utility research and field survey component of the study. In addition, to performing the utility mapping, we will provide coordination with the utility providers. This will be required to verify utility facilities and to determine the capacity of the existing utilities and any future planned system upgrades. For example, we plan to determine what, if any, upgrades will be required for the electrical and broadband networks along the corridor.

3.A Task Management, QA/QC, Meetings
This task includes management and coordination of the work below, including subconsultants. This task includes meetings with City staff and QA/QC of deliverables.

3.B Topographic Survey
The GHD team will provide a planning level field survey along the corridor from Harbor Boulevard to 5th Street.

Our survey scope will include This task will result in a Digital Terrain Model (DTM) in 40 scale that will be the basis for all of our mapping and exhibits. This scope also includes:
• Survey of all visible existing utilities
• Topographic survey with 1-foot contours up to 200 feet on either side of centerline of Sacramento Avenue • Utility survey with manhole dips
• Traffic Control for survey work
• Aerial survey with targets
• Survey will be based on City’s horizontal (NAD83) and vertical (NGVD29) datums.

Task 3.B Deliverables
• One survey base file (pdf, dwg)
Task 3.C Utility Research and Locating
This task will focus on compiling data regarding the existing utilities along the corridor. GHD will be assisted by our subcontractor, Badger Daylighting. Their scope will include:
• Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) surface scan
• Inductive Sweep
148
West Sacramento Proposal | Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs And Financing Plan 5 • GPD Data Collection
• Potholes (25 verified locations)
• Traffic control
The purpose of this effort is to identify all the underground and overhead utilities along the corridor to the extent possible. Our approach is to take more of a planning level utility research effort for the project in order to provide more cost effective service. As a result, we are proposing to do fewer potholes than what would typically be required for an underground construction project. For future design and construction projects additional potholing would still be required but this effort will reduce the amount of work required later. The benefit of performing GPR scan for the entire corridor is that it provides a snapshot of the horizontal utilities without having to do individual potholing. Typically, GPR would not be sufficient by itself to perform a construction level utility survey, but it is adequate to determine a basic inventory of the underground utility network. We have included 25 potholes for specific locations along the corridor where positive location will be useful. Additional potholes can be provided for an additional fee.

Task 3.C Deliverables
• Pothole sketches (pdf) identifying utility type, size, depth. Locations will be added to the utility base map. • Utility base map (dwg, pdf)
Task 3.D – Sewer, Water, and Stormwater Conditions Assessment The GHD team will analyze the existing information provided by the City regarding the water, sanitary sewer, and storm drain systems along the corridor. The purpose of this exercise is to determine the capacity of the existing systems (to the extent possible) and propose capacity increases (if necessary) to support future development.

We will use the existing information from the City such as master plan studies, as-builts, maintenance data, etc.

This effort will be performed for the water supply, sanitary sewer, and storm drain system in the project area.

However, this will not be a Master Plan type study. Our work will focus on the project corridor and specific improvements or upgrades as applicable. The Wet Utilities Report will summarize the existing system capacities and provide recommendations for improvements.

Prepare conditions assessment memorandum(s) of utilities to understand existing capacity. This may require visual inspections, coordination with utility agencies, load-capacity analysis of existing infrastructure, review of City’s documents/studies/models, etc. Identify estimate of properties on septic to understand capacity needs if these properties switch to the public sewer system.

Prepare an infrastructure needs assessment for water, sewer and stormwater sheds to meet City’s buildout conditions and up to two (2) buildout scenarios to provide adequate public facilities for growth. This may require the development of water, sewer, and stormwater projections or the review and validation of City provided models to verify needed infrastructure findings. Include analysis of opportunities and challenges to achieve the buildout scenarios.

Task 3.D Deliverables
• One draft Sewer, Water, Stormwater Condition Assessment Report (pdf) • One final Sewer, Water, Stormwater Condition Assessment Report (pdf) Task 3.E – Summary Report
The GHD team will prepare a summary report with recommendations for utility and public infrastructure improvements along with a preliminary Opinion of Probably Cost. This summary report will identify and define the existing utility infrastructure along the corridor and an estimate of the improvements needed to support future development based on zoning density assumptions. GHD will utilize all available information to prepare the analysis. Zoning densities will be used as a basis to determine the ultimate build-out requirements for individual parcels.

Task 3.E Deliverables
• One draft Infrastructure Summary Report (pdf)
149
West Sacramento Proposal | Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs And Financing Plan 6 • One final Infrastructure Summary Report (pdf)
• Opinion of Probable Cost (pdf)
Task 4 – Electric and Gas Distribution Grid Needs Assessment Using the information from Task 3 regarding the existing electric and gas distribution network, GHD will Compile information from Pacific Gas & Electric regarding existing distribution capacity, voltage support services, reliability services, and resiliency services. Conduct scenario analysis and identify infrastructure needs to meet City’s buildout conditions and up to two (2) buildout scenarios to provide adequate public facilities for growth and in alignment with the City’s planning and policies documents (i.e. General Plan, Mobility Action Plan, Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change, etc.) to support mobility hubs and electric vehicle supply equipment. Include analysis of opportunities and challenges to achieve the buildout scenarios.

Task 4 Deliverables
• One draft Electric and Gas Summary Report (pdf)
• One final Electric and Gas Summary Report (pdf)
Task 5 – Telecommunications and Broadband Needs Assessment Using the City of West Sacramento’s Broadband Infrastructure Assessment and Action Plan, GHD will determine whether existing broadband assets meet City’s buildout conditions and up to two (2) buildout scenarios to provide adequate public facilities for future growth and in alignment the City’s planning and policies documents (i.e.

General Plan, Mobility Action Plan, Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change, etc.) to support mobility hubs and electric vehicle supply equipment. Identify appropriate minimum conduit specifications to support needs in the buildout scenarios.

Task 5 Deliverables
• One draft Telecommunications and Broadband Summary Report (pdf) • One final Telecommunications and Broadband Summary Report (pdf) Assumptions and Exclusions
• CCTV of sanitary sewer and storm drain pipelines is not included but can be provided for an additional fee.
• This scope does not include masterplan analysis of the water, storm drain, and sanitary sewer systems. • The topographic survey is intended for planning level use. For actual design and construction additional supplemental survey will be required in specific locations. • The utility locating scope is intended for a planning level effort. For actual design and construction additional potholing will be required in specific locations. • No geotechnical investigation is included but can be provided for an additional fee. • No traffic analysis is included but can be provided for an additional fee. • Street improvements and ADA upgrades were not included but can be provided for an additional fee. • Final design plans and specifications are not included but can be provided for an additional fee.

Fee
GHD and subconsultants (Chaudhary Associates, Badger Daylight, and WRT) will perform the scope of services on a time and materials basis based on the estimated fees shown in Table 1 150
West Sacramento Proposal | Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs And Financing Plan 1 TABLE 1: FEE PROPOSAL TO COMPLETE GREEN MEANS GO – SACRAMENTO AVENUE CORRIDOR INFILL & INFRASTRUCTURE

CAPACITY, NEEDS AND FINANCING PLAN
Kamesh VedulaTodd TregenzaErik FanselauJonathan LinkusVince CruzChris DoudCameron KandolaMelissa Hight Chaudhary Badger WRT
Principal-in-ChargeProject ManagerUtilities LeadUrban Planning LeadProject EngineerProject EngineerGraduate EngineerIntern Task # Task Description $ 314 $ 241 $ 251 $ 194 $ 146 $ 135 $ 109 $ 73 Task 1 Project Management 12 12 $2,888 $1,860 $4,748

1.A Project Invoices & Progress Reports 12 12 $ 2,888 $ 1,860 $ 4,748 Task 2 Zoning and Planning Updates 2 98 44 80 8 40 272 $2,200 $57,096 $ $ $96,460 $153,556

2.A Task Management, QA/QC, Meetings 2 16 8 16 42 $ 1,000 $ 10,596 $ 11,660 $ 22,256

2.B Background Research 2 2 $ 481 $ 7,300 $ 7,781

2.C Evaluation of Current Zoning Code and Recommendations 8 8 $ 1,925 $ 13,600 $ 15,525

2.D Draft Zoning Code Amendments / ODDS 8 8 $ 1,925 $ 18,780 $ 20,705

2.E Administrative Draft 12 12 $ 2,888 $ 14,600 $ 17,488

2.F Public Review Draft 12 12 $ 2,888 $ 12,720 $ 15,608

2.G Community Workshop 8 8 8 4 28 $ 1,200 $ 7,273 $ 4,800 $ 12,073

2.H Planning Commision & City Council Study Session (1 each) 8 8 8 4 28 $ 6,073 $ 5,640 $ 11,713

2.I Public Hearings (up to 2) 8 8 8 24 $ 5,488 $ 3,680 $ 9,168

2.J Prepare Development Forecasts 16 12 40 40 108 $ 17,558 $ 3,680 $ 21,238 Task 3 Sewer, Water, Stormwater Needs Assessment 4 12 72 24 96 32 240 $1,000 $43,140 $185,330 $133,232 $361,702

3.A Task Management, QA/QC, Meetings 2 4 24 8 38 $ 1,000 $ 9,694 $ 9,694

3.B Topographic Survey 4 16 20 $ 3,157 $ 185,330 $ 188,487

3.C Utility Research and Locating 4 16 16 36 $ 5,497 $ 133,232 $ 138,729

3.D Sewer, Water, Stormwater Conditions Assessment 8 40 16 64 $ 9,136 $ 9,136 E3.E Summary Report 2 8 32 8 16 16 82 $ 15,657 $ 15,657 Task 4 Electric and Gas Distribution Grid Needs Assessment 20 88 86 40 16 40 290 $500 $50,036 $50,036

4.A Task Management, QA/QC, Meetings 12 8 6 26 $ 500 $ 6,274 $ 6,274

4.B Electric and Gas Distribution Grid Needs Assessment 8 80 80 40 16 40 264 $ 43,762 $ 43,762 Task 5 Telecommunications and Broadband Needs Assessment 20 88 86 40 16 40 290 $500 $50,036 $ $50,036

5.A Task Management, QA/QC, Meetings 12 8 6 26 $ 500 $ 6,274 $ 6,274

5.B Telecommunications and Broadband Needs Assessment 8 80 80 40 16 40 264 $ 43,762 $ 43,762 Total Hours 6 162 292 204 176 64 120 1,104
Total Budget
$ 1,885 $ 38,982 $ 73,324 $ 29,833 $ 23,676 $ 6,984 $ 8,767 $ 4,200 $ 203,195 $ 185,330 $ 133,232 $ 98,320 $ 620,077 Total Cost Total CostTotal Project Cost
GHD
GHD Total HoursGHD Direct ExpensesGHD Total Cost Total Cost 151
West Sacramento Proposal | Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs And Financing Plan 2 TABLE 1: FEE PROPOSAL TO COMPLETE GREEN MEANS GO – SACRAMENTO AVENUE CORRIDOR INFILL & INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY, NEEDS AND FINANCING PLAN (CONT’D)
James StickleyPoonam NarkarRohit TakMarina Freitas
Principal-in-ChargeSr. Urban DesignerProject Manager/Urban DesignerUrban Desiner 1 Task # Task Description $ 240 $ 195 $ 155 $ 110
Task 1 Project Management 12 12 $1,860

1.A Project Invoices & Progress Reports 12 12 $ 1,860
Task 2 Zoning and Planning Updates 4 140 228 296 668 $300 $96,460

2.A Task Management, QA/QC, Meetings 28 40 68 $ 11,660

2.B Background Research 8 20 24 52 $ 7,300

2.C Evaluation of Current Zoning Code and Recommendations 1 16 32 48 97 $ 13,600

2.D Draft Zoning Code Amendments / ODDS 1 24 32 80 137 $ 100 $ 18,780

2.E Administrative Draft 16 40 48 104 $ 14,600

2.F Public Review Draft 1 16 32 40 89 $ 12,720

2.G Community Workshop 1 8 8 16 33 $ 4,800

2.H Planning Commision & City Council Study Session (1 each) 8 8 24 40 $ 200 $ 5,640

2.I Public Hearings (up to 2) 8 8 8 24 $ 3,680

2.J Prepare Development Forecasts 8 8 8 24 $ 3,680
Task 3 Sewer, Water, Stormwater Needs Assessment $ $

3.A Task Management, QA/QC, Meetings - $ -

3.B Topographic Survey - $ -

3.C Utility Research and Locating - $ -

3.D Sewer, Water, Stormwater Conditions Assessment - $ - E3.E Summary Report - $ -
Task 4 Electric and Gas Distribution Grid Needs Assessment $ $

4.A Task Management, QA/QC, Meetings - $ -

4.B Electric and Gas Distribution Grid Needs Assessment - $ - Task 5 Telecommunications and Broadband Needs Assessment $ $

5.A Task Management, QA/QC, Meetings - $ -

5.B Telecommunications and Broadband Needs Assessment - $ - Total Hours 4 140 240 296 680
Total Budget
$ 960 $ 27,300 $ 37,200 $ 32,560 $ 300 $ 98,320
WRT
WRT Total HoursWRT Direct ExpensesWRT Total Cost
152

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 1, 2023 ITEM # 8
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-81 AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S ACCEPTANCE OF A PUBLIC USE PROPERTY TRANSFER LOCATED AT 450 LIGHTHOUSE DRIVE (APN 010-523-038) FROM THE WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Mark Polhemus, Senior Program Manager
Economic Development & Housing
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to adopt Resolution 23-81 (Attachment 1) delegating authority to the City Manager to accept a public use property transfer located at 450 Lighthouse Drive (APN 010-523-038) previously dedicated to the City by the Oversight Board of the West Sacramento Redevelopment Successor Agency (“Successor Agency”).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 23-81 authorizing the acceptance of the public use property transfer located at 450 Lighthouse Drive (APN 010-523-038) from the Successor Agency.

BACKGROUND
In 1992, the Redevelopment Agency acquired a parcel to facilitate the 5th Street/Lighthouse Road roadway extension to serve the Lighthouse Marina and Riverbend Development (presently named The Rivers). After completion of the roadway extension, the acquired property had been split by the street improvement, resulting in two parcels and public right-of-way. The resultant parcels are 450 Lighthouse Drive (APN 010-523-038) and 485 Lighthouse Drive (APN 010-523-037).

Redevelopment dissolution legislation required that successor agencies dispose of real estate assets and that they may transfer public use properties to another government agency. On June 14, 2012, the Successor Agency Oversight Board (OB) approved OB Resolution 12-4 authorizing the Successor Agency to transfer several public use properties, including 450 Lighthouse Drive, to the City. 450 Lighthouse Drive was included as a right-of-way use situated between Lighthouse Drive and County Road 136 (Levee Road). However, this transfer was not implemented, as neither the Redevelopment Agency nor Successor Agency had prepared legal property descriptions for the two parcels created because of the roadway extension project. The absence of legal descriptions for the two parcels prevented the Successor Agency from transferring the property to the City through a grant deed.

ANALYSIS
City staff recently commissioned the appropriate survey work to record legal descriptions for the parcels located at 450 and 485 Lighthouse Drive to effectuate the public use transfer of 450 Lighthouse Drive from the Successor Agency to the City.

Resolution 23-81 authorizes the City Manager to accept the parcel located at 450 Lighthouse Drive from the Successor Agency as a public use property. By delegating this authority to the City Manager, the City Council will assist the Successor Agency in completing the disposition or public agency transfer of assets still owned by the Redevelopment Agency.

The recommended action is part of the Successor Agency’s past and ongoing efforts to dispose of the former Redevelopment Agency’s real property as required by redevelopment dissolution legislation; and furthers a past action approved by the Successor Agency Oversight Board on June 14, 2012, to transfer public use assets to the City pursuant to AB 26 X1 (Budget Committee, 2011).

Environmental Considerations
This action is not a project that is subject to CEQA because it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21065; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15060(c), 15378(a).
153
Resolution 23-81 Acceptance of Public Use Transfer 450 Lighthouse November 1, 2023

Commission Recommendation
Not applicable.

Strategic Plan Integration
This item effectuates past City Council priority policy agenda items, including “Post-Redevelopment Asset Protection.”
Alternatives
Alternatives to the recommended action for City Council consideration include:

1. Decline to adopt Resolution 23-81; or

2. Delay action on this item.

These alternatives are not recommended as they will delay the Successor Agency’s legally required process of disposing of assets owned by the former Redevelopment Agency.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by Economic Development and Housing staff in consultation with the City Attorney, Finance Department, and Capital Projects Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
There are no budget impacts associated with the recommended action.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution 23-81
154
RESOLUTION 23-81

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC USE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 450 LIGHTHOUSE DRIVE (APN 010-523-038) DEDICATED TO

THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO BY THE WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT

SUCCESSOR AGENCY
WHEREAS, on February 1, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution 12-7 confirming that the City of West Sacramento is the Successor Agency to the West Sacramento Redevelopment Agency (“Successor Agency”); and
WHEREAS, Health and Safety code section 34177(h) directs that the City of West Sacramento as the Successor Agency wind down the affairs of the former Agency; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency is the owner of a parcel located at 450 Lighthouse Drive (APN 010-523-038) (“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Health and Safety Code section 34181(a), the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency is authorized to direct the Successor Agency to transfer ownership of assets that were acquired or constructed and used for a governmental purpose, such as a road, school buildings, park and fire stations to the appropriate public jurisdiction pursuant to any existing agreements or recorded covenants related to the sue of such as asset; and
WHEREAS, on June 14, 2012, the Successor Agency Oversight Board adopted OB Resolution 12-4 identifying the Property as a public-use asset and directing the Successor Agency to transfer the Property fee title to the City of West Sacramento; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by City Council of the City of West Sacramento that:

1. The City finds that the Property is needed for the public purpose identified in OB Resolution 12-4, and that the acceptance of the properties is consistent with the City’s General Plan and with the advanced planning objectives described in the aforementioned Oversight Board resolution; and

2. The City Manager is authorized and immediately directed to take any and all actions necessary or advisable to accept the fee title, on behalf of the City Council, for the Property.
155
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of November 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
156