West Sacramento City Council
November 6, 2024

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Capital Projects Department, and in coordination with the Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
This project is included in the City’s current Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as CIP 52077 and has an approved budget of $100,000. The total amount needed to fund the contract, staff time, and contingency is $45,000. Resolution 24-109 proposes to amend the Capital Improvement Program to transfer funds from the General Facilities Fund (Fund 208) to this project to cover the contract and remaining project costs.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution 24-109
160
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 24-109

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT ACCESS CONTROLS SYSTEM UPGRADE PROJECT (CIP 52077) WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the biennial Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for Fiscal Years 2022/23 and 2023/24 on June 28, 2023; and WHEREAS, CIP 52077 – Police Department Access Controls System Upgrade Program was established, and appropriations of $75,000 from the General Facilities Fund were approved to fund the project; and
WHEREAS, on June 5, 2024, the City Council awarded an emergency contract with RFI Communications and Security Systems; and
WHEREAS, City Staff requested additional funding of $25,000 to cover the estimated total amount needed to fund the contract, staff time, and contingency; and WHEREAS, during the installation of the access controls, additional scope to complete the project was identified by the vendor, resulting in additional expense and staff time; and WHEREAS, a budget transfer is requested and recommended in the amount of $45,000 from the General Facilities fund (208) in order to complete this project; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento as follows:

1. The City Council hereby finds that the facts set forth in the recitals to this Resolution are true and correct and establish the factual basis for the City Council’s adoption of this Resolution.

2. The City Council hereby approves amendments to the Capital Improvement Program Budget for CIP 52077 for the 2024/2025 fiscal year as shown below:

SOURCES
$45,000 208-0000-3110 General Facilities Fund Balance
$45,000 400-9900-4990/52077-4990 Transfer in to project $45,000 Total Sources
USES
$45,000 208-9910-5950 Transfer from General Facilities Fund $45,000 400-9900-5530/52077-5800 Project Budget
$45,000 Total Uses
*Note: Interfund transfers excluded from totals to avoid duplication of total costs.

3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of November 2024 by the following vote:
161
Attachment 1
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
162

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 6, 2024 ITEM # 12
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AN ON-CALL LIST OF INDUSTRIAL PAINTERS TO

PROVIDE PAINTING AND COATING RELATED SERVICES
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Lorianne Landsaw, Senior Analyst
Public Works Department
ATTACHMENT [ ] Yes [X] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to approve an on-call list of industrial painters to provide as-needed painting and coating services.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:

1. Find that the proposed on-call list of industrial painters to provide as-needed painting and coating services is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis under the Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption and find that the exemption determination reflects the independent judgment of the City as lead agency under CEQA;

2. Approve the on-call list of Industrial Painters for painting and coating related services for 3 years; and

3. Delegate authority to the City Manager or his designee to extend the on-call list for two (2) 1-year extensions.

BACKGROUND
The City relies on contractors certified to provide industrial-level painting and coating services when specific areas of City infrastructure need to be repaired or maintained. In the past, staff has issued Invitations to Bid and Requests for Proposals on an individual project basis to support various capital improvement projects.

Establishing an Industrial Painting on-call list saves staff time, expedites project delivery, and ensures that the contractors are properly certified for the types of paint and coating necessary in the project application. The oncall list is anticipated to be utilized for utility and capital project needs.

ANALYSIS
Staff issued a Request for Qualifications (24-040-RFQ) for industrial painting and coating services on an asneeded basis on August 16, 2024. The RFQ was advertised on the City of West Sacramento’s OpenGov website.

Seven (7) proposals were received and evaluated to determine qualifications based on experience with public agency capital projects and material familiarity.

After careful consideration of each company’s qualifications, availability, and expertise, the following firms have been qualified for the on-call list:
 Blackhawk Painting, Inc.
 Certified Coatings Company
 Process Measurement Group
 River City Painting, Inc.
 Unified Field Services Corporation
As the need for industrial painting or coating is identified, the City will issue a shorted Invitation to Bid to the firms on the pre-established on-call list. The responses will be reviewed by a panel, and a company will be selected based on price with a Construction Contract established. The contract will include standard guarantees and obligations (e.g., insurance coverage and bonds). All CIP contracts exceeding $50,000 will require approval utilizing normal procedures.

Having companies on the on-call list for Industrial Painting and Coating saves staff time in soliciting and reviewing bids while complying with the City’s purchasing policy and state procurement requirements. Federally funded projects will still require individual competitive solicitations to be performed for these services. 163
On-Call Industrial Painter List
November 6, 2024

Environmental Considerations
The approval of a list of on-call Industrial Painting contractors is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, the Class 1 Categorical Exemption. The project involves the maintenance and/or minor alteration of existing facilities and negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing.

Commission Recommendation
Not applicable
Strategic Plan Integration
The creation of an on-call list for Industrial Painting and Coating supports the 2024 Strategic Principle of providing Core Services and Infrastructure.

Alternatives
The City Council may decide to:

1. Approve the recommended action as stated above.

2. Reject all proposals and direct staff to reissue the Request for Qualifications process.

3. Reject all proposals and direct staff to issue Invitations to Bid for each individual project.

Alternative 1 is recommended because having an on-call list where the Contractors have already had their certifications reviewed saves time in soliciting and reviewing bids for projects where specific standard are required.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Public Works department with review by the Capital Projects and Finance Departments.

Budget/Cost Impact
The approval of an on-call list does not guarantee work to any specific contractor. Prior to individual project initiation, budget will be reviewed with the Finance Department and contracts approved by the City Council.

There are no budget costs or impacts at this time.

ATTACHMENT
None
164

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 6, 2024 ITEM # 13
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL FOR A CONTRACT WITH GEOSYNTEC

CONSULTANTS FOR THE GEORGE KRISTOFF WATER TREATMENT PLANT SLUDGE

POND MONITORING AND REPORTING SERVICES
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Lorianne Landsaw, Senior Analyst
Public Works Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to consider for approval a professional services contract with Geosyntec Consultants to provide compliance with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Waste Water Discharge (WDR) requirements for the George Kristoff Water Treatment Plant (WTP).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:

1. Award a contract for sludge pond monitoring and reporting services to Geosyntec Consultants in the amount of $74,796;

2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the contract with approval from the City Attorney;

3. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute amendments or change orders up to 10% ($7,479) of the contract amount; and

4. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute amendments to extend the term of the contract to utilize the two additional one-year term extensions and increase the compensation in accordance with Exhibit A of the contract.

BACKGROUND
The City is required under the California Regional Water Control Board, Central Valley Region Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP) R5-2015-0130 and Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) to monitor the George Kristoff Water Treatment Plant (WTP) sludge ponds on a quarterly basis. Wastewater generated at the WTP is composed of wastewater and sludge from the Actiflo® settling basins, spent water from the filter backwash operations, and any water that has gone through analyzers for process control. Approximately 100,000 gallons per day of backwash water is generated. The wastewater is collected in two concrete basins where a portion of the decant water (less than ten percent of influent raw water flow rate) is returned to the treatment process. The remaining wastewater in the basins is discharged to the sanitary sewer that is managed by Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District and sometimes discharged to three existing unlined sludge drying ponds which can impact ground water.

ANALYSIS
On August 23, 2024, staff issued a Request for Proposals (24-053-RFP) for firms to provide sludge pond monitoring services required under the monitoring and reporting program R5-2015-0130. Five proposals were received, and all met the criteria and were deemed to be qualified. Staff reviewed each proposal and associated costs to determine the best qualified consultant, and Geosyntec was selected.

Environmental Considerations
This action is not a project that is subject to CEQA because it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21065; CEQA Guidelines § 15060(c), 15378(a).)
Commission Recommendation
Not applicable
165
Contract with Geosyntec Consultants
November 6, 2024

Strategic Plan Integration
Council approval of the Sludge Pond Monitoring Services contract is consistent with the City Council’s strategic principle of core services and infrastructure.

Alternatives
The City Council may decide to:

1. Approve the recommended action; or

2. Direct staff to re-issue the RFP for a different pool of respondents.

Based on the pool of respondents, staff believes that awarding the contract to Geosyntec Consultants is the best choice to ensure compliance with the State’s requirements.

Coordination and Review
The proposal evaluation was conducted by staff from the Water Treatment Plant Division of the Public Works and Operations Department and the Capital Projects Department, and the report has been reviewed by the Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
The annual cost for all services is $24,932. The remaining fiscal year budget for 2024/25 in the water treatment professional services line item is sufficient to cover the costs of service. A small budget increase ($1,222/year) will be included for the additional years of service in the next budget cycle.

ATTACHMENT

1. PWO24-274 Geosyntec Sludge Monitoring Contract
166
Geosyntec Consultants
PWO24-274 – Sludge Pond Monitoring
Expires on 12/31/27
1 5/2/24

CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
THIS CONTRACT is made on November 6, 2024 by and between the CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (“City”), and Geosyntec Consultants (“Consultant”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the City desires a qualified firm to provide monitoring and reporting services in accordance with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Waste Discharge Requirements and Monitoring and Reporting Program at the George Kristoff Water Treatment Plant; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has presented a proposal for such services to the City, dated September 13, 2024, (attached hereto as Exhibit “A”) and is duly licensed, qualified and experienced to perform those services;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES:

A. Consultant shall do all work, attend all meetings, produce all reports and carry out all activities necessary to completion of the services described in Exhibit “A”. This Contract and its exhibits shall be known as the “Contract Documents.” Terms set forth in any Contract Document shall be deemed to be incorporated in all Contract Documents as if set forth in full therein. In the event of conflict between terms contained in these Contract Documents, the more specific term shall control. If any portion of the Contract Documents shall be in conflict with any other portion, provisions contained in the Contract shall govern over conflicting provisions contained in the exhibits to the Contract.

B. Consultant enters into this Contract as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City. The Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Contract to bind the City in any respect. Nothing in this Contract shall be construed to be inconsistent with this relationship or status. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by the Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of the Consultant and not of the City. The City shall not be obligated in any way to pay any wage claims or other claims made against Consultant by any such employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, or any other person resulting from performance of this Contract. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, To the greatest extent permitted by law, Consultant and its employees, agents, and subcontractors shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of 167
Geosyntec Consultants
PWO24-274 – Sludge Pond Monitoring
Expires on 12/31/27
2 5/2/24
City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

C. The Consultant agrees it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

2. TERM OF CONTRACT
A. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Contract by the City, and shall be undertaken and completed in accordance with the Schedule of Performance attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit “B” and terminate on December 31, 2027.

B. Consultant’s failure to complete work in accordance with the Schedule of Performance may result in delayed compensation as described in Section 3.

C. The City Manager or his or her designee may, by written instrument signed by the Parties, extend the duration of this Contract for two (2) additional one-year extensions in the manner provided in Section 5, provided that the extension does not require the payment of compensation in excess of the Council approved budget.

3. COMPENSATION:

A. The Consultant shall be paid at the completion of services for the actual fees, costs and expenses for all time and materials required and expended, but in no event shall total compensation exceed seventy-four thousand seven hundred ninety-six dollars ($74,796) without City’s prior written approval. Consultant's fees shall be as specified in the Schedule of Fees, which is attached hereto an incorporated herein as Exhibit "A".

B. Said amount shall be paid upon submittal of a monthly billing showing completion of the tasks that month. Consultant shall furnish City with invoices for all expenses as well as for all materials authorized by this Contract. The invoices shall be submitted with the monthly billings.

If Consultant’s performance is not in conformity with the Schedule of Performance, payments may be delayed or denied, unless the Consultant’s failure to perform in conformity with the Schedule of Performance is a documented result of the City’s failure to conform with the Schedule of Performance, or if the Schedule of Performance is extended pursuant to Section 5.

C. If the work is halted at the request of the City, compensation shall be based upon the proportion that the work performed bears to the total work required by this Contract, subject to Section 4.

4. TERMINATION:

A. This Contract may be terminated by either party, provided that the other party is given not less than 30 calendar days’ written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate.

B. The City may temporarily suspend this Contract, at no additional cost to City, provided that the Consultant is given written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt 168
Geosyntec Consultants
PWO24-274 – Sludge Pond Monitoring
Expires on 12/31/27
3 5/2/24
requested) of temporary suspension. If City gives such notice of temporary suspension, Consultant shall immediately suspend its activities under this Contract.

C. Notwithstanding any provisions of this Contract, Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this Contract by Consultant, and the City may withhold any payments due to Consultant until such time as the exact amount of damages, if any, due the City from Consultant is determined.

D. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be compensated as provided for in this Contract, except as provided in Section 4C. Upon termination, the City shall be entitled to all work, including but not limited to, appraisals, inventories, studies, analyses, drawings and data estimates performed to that date in accordance with Section 7 hereof.

5. AMENDMENTS, CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS:

Amendments, changes or modifications in the terms of this Contract may be made at any time by mutual written agreement between the parties hereto and shall be signed by the persons authorized to bind the parties hereto.

6. EXTENSIONS OF TIME:

Consultant may, for good cause, request extensions of time to perform the services required hereunder. Such extensions shall be authorized in advance by the City in writing and shall be incorporated in written amendments to this Contract or the attached Work Program in the manner provided in Section 5.

7. PROPERTY OF CITY:

A. It is mutually agreed that all materials prepared by the Consultant under this Contract shall become the property of the City, and the Consultant shall have no property right therein whatsoever. Immediately upon termination, the City shall be entitled to, and the Consultant shall deliver to the City, all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and other such materials as may have been prepared or accumulated to date by the Consultant in performing this Contract which is not Consultant’s privileged information, as defined by law, or Consultant’s personnel information, along with all other property belonging exclusively to the City which is in the Consultant’s possession.

B. Additionally, it is agreed that the parties intend this to be a contract for services and each considers the products and results of the services to be rendered by Consultant hereunder (the “Work”) to be a work made for hire. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that the Work (and all rights therein, including, without limitation, copyright) belongs to and shall be the sole and exclusive property of the City.

8. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS:

A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of federal, State and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Contract.

B. Consultant warrants to the City that it is licensed by all applicable governmental bodies to perform this Contract and will remain so licensed throughout the progress of the Work, 169
Geosyntec Consultants
PWO24-274 – Sludge Pond Monitoring
Expires on 12/31/27
4 5/2/24
and that it has, and will have, throughout the progress of the Work, the necessary experience, skill and financial resources to enable it to perform this Contract.

9. WARRANTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES - CONSULTANT:

A. Consultant agrees and represents that it is qualified to properly provide the services set forth in Exhibit “A” in a manner which is consistent with the generally accepted standards of Consultant’s profession.

B. Consultant agrees and represents that the work performed under this Contract shall be in accordance with applicable federal, State and local law in accordance with Section 17A hereof.

C. Consultant shall designate a project manager who at all times shall represent the Consultant before the City on all matters relating to this Contract. The project manager shall continue in such capacity unless and until he or she is removed at the request of the City, is no longer employed by Consultant, or is replaced with the written approval of the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.

D. Consultant shall provide corrective services without charge to the City for services which fail to meet the above professional and legal standards and which are reported to Consultant in writing within sixty (60) days of discovery. Should Consultant fail or refuse to perform promptly its obligations, the City may render or undertake performance thereof and the Consultant shall be liable for any expenses thereby incurred.

10. SUBCONTRACTING:

None of the services covered by this Contract shall be subcontracted without the prior written consent of the City, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Consultant shall be as fully responsible to the City for the negligent acts and omissions of its contractors and subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as it is for the negligent acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Consultant.

11. ASSIGNABILITY:

Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Contract whether by assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of the City which will not be unreasonably withheld.

However, claims for money due or to become due Consultant from the City under this Contract may be assigned to a financial institution, or to a trustee in bankruptcy, without such approval.

Notice of any assignment or transfer whether voluntary or involuntary shall be furnished promptly to the City.

12. INTEREST IN CONTRACT:

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any of its employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the subject of the Contract, nor any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of its services hereunder. Consultant shall make all disclosures required by the City’s conflict of interest code in accordance with the category designated by the City, unless the City Manager determines in writing that Consultant’s duties are more limited in scope than is warranted by the category designated by the City code and that a narrower disclosure category 170
Geosyntec Consultants
PWO24-274 – Sludge Pond Monitoring
Expires on 12/31/27
5 5/2/24
should apply. Consultant also agrees to make disclosure in compliance with the City conflict of interest code if, at any time after the execution of this Contract, City determines and notifies Consultant in writing that Consultant’s duties under this Contract warrant greater disclosure by Consultant than was originally contemplated. Consultant shall make disclosures in the time, place and manner set forth in the conflict of interest code and as directed by the City.

13. MATERIALS CONFIDENTIAL:

All of the materials prepared or assembled by Consultant pursuant to performance of this Contract are confidential and Consultant agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City, except by court order.

14. LIABILITY OF CONSULTANT-NEGLIGENCE:

Consultant shall be responsible for performing the work under this Contract in a manner which is consistent with the generally-accepted standards of the Consultant’s profession and shall be liable for its own negligence and the negligent acts of its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors. The City shall have no right of control over the manner in which the work is to be done but only as to its outcome, and shall not be charged with the responsibility of preventing risk to Consultant or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors.

15. INDEMNITY AND LITIGATION COSTS:

Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, and employees against all claims, damages, demands, liability, costs, losses and expenses, including without limitation court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising from Consultant's negligent acts or negligent failure to act, errors, omissions or willful misconduct incident to the performance of this Contract except such loss or damage caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive termination or suspension of this Contract.

16. CONSULTANT TO PROVIDE INSURANCE:

A. Consultant shall not commence any work before obtaining, and shall maintain in force at all times during the duration and performance of this Contract, the policies of insurance specified in this Section. Such insurance must have the approval of the City as to limit, form, and amount, and shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A VII (an NR rating is acceptable for Worker’s Compensation insurance written with the State Compensation Insurance Fund of California).

B. Prior to execution of this Contract and prior to commencement of any work, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and copies of endorsements providing evidence of coverage for all policies required by the Contract. The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall, at their expense, maintain in effect at all times during the performance of work under the Contract not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policy satisfactory to the City. The maintenance by Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors of the following coverage and limits of insurance is a material element of this Contract. The failure of Consultant or of any of its contractors or subcontractors to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of this Contract. Approval of the insurance by the City shall not relieve or decrease any liability of Consultant. 171
Geosyntec Consultants
PWO24-274 – Sludge Pond Monitoring
Expires on 12/31/27
6 5/2/24

1. Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance

a. Worker’s Compensation - Insurance to protect the Consultant, its contractors and subcontractors from all claims under Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Acts, including Longshoremen’s and Harbor Worker’s Act (“Acts”), if applicable. Such coverage shall be maintained, in type and amount, in strict compliance with all applicable state and Federal statutes and regulations.

The Consultant shall execute a certificate in compliance with Labor Code Section 1861, on the form provided in the Contract Documents.
b. Consultant shall provide a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant.

2. Commercial General Liability Insurance
a. The insurance shall be provided on form CG0001, or it’s equivalent, and shall include coverage for claims for bodily injury or property damage arising out of premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual liability, and subconsultant’s work and personal and advertising injury resulting from actions, failures to act, or operations of the insured, or by its employees or agents, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the insured. The amount of insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general and products/completed operations aggregates. b. The commercial general liability insurance shall also include the following:
i. Endorsement equivalent to CG 2010 0714 naming the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds. The endorsement shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
ii. Endorsement stating insurance provided to the City shall be primary as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and any insurance or self insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it, to the payment or satisfaction of any defense expenses, loss, or judgment.
iii. Provision or endorsement stating that the Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

3. Commercial Automobile Insurance
a. The insurance shall include, but shall not be limited to, coverage for claims for bodily injury or property damage for owned, non-owned, and hired 172
Geosyntec Consultants
PWO24-274 – Sludge Pond Monitoring
Expires on 12/31/27
7 5/2/24
automobiles resulting from actions, failures to act, or operations of the insured, or by its employees or agents, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the insured. The amount of insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per accident.
b. The commercial automobile insurance shall include the same endorsements required for the commercial general liability policy (see Section

16.B.2.b).

4. Professional Liability. The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall secure and maintain in full force, during the term of this Contract and for five years thereafter, professional liability insurance policies appropriate to the respective professions and the work to be performed as specified in this Contract. The limits of such professional liability insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per claim.

C. In addition to any other remedy the City may have, if Consultant fails to maintain the insurance coverage as required in this Section, the City may obtain such insurance coverage as is not being maintained, in form and amount substantially the same as is required herein, and the City may deduct the cost of such insurance from any amounts due or which may become due Consultant under this Contract.

D. No policy required by this Contract shall be suspended, cancelled, terminated by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits unless Consultant has provided thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City.

E. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions in excess of $10,000 must be declared to, and approved by, the City.

F. The requirement as to types, limits, and the City’s approval of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant are not intended to, and shall not in any manner, limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations assumed by Consultant under the Contract.

17. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS:

A. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of, shall observe and comply with, and shall cause any and all persons, firms or corporations employed by it or under its control to observe and comply with, applicable federal, state, county and municipal laws, ordinances, regulations, orders and decrees which in any manner affect those engaged or employed on the work described by this Contract or the materials used or which in any way affect the conduct of the work.

B. Consultant shall not engage in unlawful employment discrimination. Such unlawful employment discrimination includes, but is not limited to, employment discrimination based upon a person’s race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, gender, citizenship, or sexual orientation.

C. Consultant shall maintain and make available for inspection by the City and its auditors accurate records of all of its costs, disbursements and receipts with respect to any work under this Contract. Such inspections may be made during regular office hours at any time until six (6) months after the final payments under this Contract are made to the Consultant. 173
Geosyntec Consultants
PWO24-274 – Sludge Pond Monitoring
Expires on 12/31/27
8 5/2/24
D. This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relative to the services specified herein and no modification hereof shall be effective unless and until such modification is evidenced by a writing signed by both parties to this Contract. There are no understandings, agreements, conditions, representations, warranties or promises, with respect to this Contract, except those contained in or referred to in the writing.

E. All notices that are required to be given by one party to the other under this Contract shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if delivered personally or enclosed in a properly addressed envelope and deposited in a United States Post Office for delivery by registered or certified mail addressed to the parties at the following addresses:

City: City of West Sacramento
Attn to: Chris Kania
1951 South River Road
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Email: [email protected]

Consultant:

Geosyntec Consultants
Attn to: Grant Hurst
3043 Gold Canal Drive, Suite 100
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Email: [email protected]

F. This Contract shall be interpreted and governed by the laws of the State of California.

G. Any action arising out of this Contract shall be brought and maintained in Yolo County California, regardless of where else venue may lie.

H. In any action brought by either party to enforce the terms of this Contract, each party shall be bear responsibility for its attorney’s fees and all costs regardless of whether one party is determined to be the prevailing party.
[Signatures on following page]
174
Geosyntec Consultants
PWO24-274 – Sludge Pond Monitoring
Expires on 12/31/27
9 5/2/24

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
By: __________________________
Amanda Berlin, Assistant City Manager
ATTEST:

By: _______________________
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: _______________________
Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
By: _________________________
Arthur Forma, Senior Principal, Project
Director
175
Geosyntec Consultants
PWO24-274 – Sludge Pond Monitoring
Expires on 12/31/27

EXHIBIT A
Consultant Proposal/Scope of Work
176
© 2024 Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. All rights reserved, use only with permission. Page | 1 Proposal for City of West Sacramento
George Kristoff Water Treatment Plant Sludge Pond Monitoring September 13, 2024
C. Technical Project Approach
Introduction
The City is seeking the services of a qualified consultant who can implement monitoring as required by the WDR and MRP at the Plant and fulfill the reporting obligations therein to the CVRWQCB. The following sections describe the technical approach Geosyntec will take to fulfill the Scope of Work as requested by the RFP.

Background
In preparing this proposal, Geosyntec was provided with and reviewed the following:
• Standard Professional Services Contract – Included as Attachment A to the RFP; • Insurance Checklist 2024 – Included as Attachment B to the RFP; • California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, Order R5-2015-0130 Waste Discharge Requirements for City of West Sacramento George Kristoff Water Treatment Plant, Yolo County – Included as Attachment D to the RFP; and
• California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, Order R5-2015-0130 Monitoring and Reporting Program for City of West Sacramento George Kristoff Water Treatment Plant, Yolo County – Included as Attachment E to the RFP.

Additionally, Geosyntec has direct experience and knowledge of the project, having performed this scope of work for the City since the third quarter of 2021.
177
© 2024 Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. All rights reserved, use only with permission. Page | 2 Proposal for City of West Sacramento
George Kristoff Water Treatment Plant Sludge Pond Monitoring September 13, 2024
Proposed Scope of Work
If selected as the winning consultant, Geosyntec will execute the Professional Services Contract and provide a certificate of insurance to the City. Geosyntec has reviewed the City’s standard agreement and insurance requirements provided in the RFP and does not have any comments or qualifications. Consistent with the RFP and our understanding of the project, Geosyntec has organized the scope of work into the following tasks:
• Task 1: Quarterly Monitoring and Sampling Events
• Task 2: Quarterly Monitoring Report Preparation and Delivery • Task 3: Annual Monitoring Report Preparation and Delivery Task 1: Quarterly Monitoring and Sampling Events
This task covers coordination and fieldwork of four sampling events annually (i.e., quarterly events). Geosyntec’s Project Manager will we be responsible for managing all aspects of the project including project coordination; budget tracking; invoicing; subconsultant management; interaction with regulators and client; and directing field staff and providing status reports to the City. Geosyntec will contract and coordinate with Confluence to perform the quarterly events and with Eurofins to perform laboratory analysis of the samples collected. Coordination includes scheduling the quarterly events; ensuring the required scope of work is completed; receipt and review of field measurements and analytical results; and proper purge water handling. Each quarterly event includes two components, waste water monitoring and sampling and groundwater monitoring and sampling, as described below.

Wastewater Monitoring and Sampling
Geosyntec assumes that one wastewater sample will be collected quarterly prior to discharge to the sludge drying ponds. The wastewater sample will be analyzed for total nitrogen, total dissolved solids, dissolved arsenic, dissolved lead, dissolved nickel, and total trihalomethanes. Geosyntec assumes that daily wastewater flow monitoring will be performed by the City, and the flow data will be provided to Geosyntec to complete quarterly reporting. Geosyntec also assumes that the City will perform weekly monitoring of the dissolved oxygen, freeboard, pH, odors, and berm condition (e.g., presence of weeds, debris, animal burrows, seepage, tears/abrasions to geosynthetic liners, etc.) at the sludge drying pond, and these data will be provided to Geosyntec to complete quarterly reporting.

Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling
Geosyntec assumes that wells will be sampled by purging and bailing methodologies, consistent with the method included in the Site Sampling and Analysis Plan. Groundwater monitoring and sampling activities will be performed by Confluence under subcontract to Geosyntec. Prior to purging or sampling the groundwater monitoring wells, Confluence will measure depth to groundwater to the nearest 0.01 feet. Confluence will purge approximately 3 to 5 casing volumes of groundwater and will then monitor pH, electroconductivity, and turbidity until these parameters have stabilized. Geosyntec assumes that one groundwater sample from each of the three groundwater monitoring wells, one field duplicate, and one trip blank will be collected during each event. Analysis of the field duplicate sample determines the total precision of the sampling protocol and analysis methodology, as well as the variability in obtaining samples that represent one sampling point. The trip blank provides a measure of the positive interferences introduced by the sample preservation, transportation and storage, and analytical processes. Each groundwater sample will be analyzed for nitrate as nitrogen, dissolved arsenic, dissolved lead, dissolved nickel, and total trihalomethanes. The trip blank will be analyzed for total trihalomethanes only.

The samples collected for dissolved metals will be field filtered using a 0.45-micron filter and analyzed via USEPA method 6020. Total dissolved solids will be analyzed utilizing Method SM 2540C. Total nitrogen and nitrate as 178
© 2024 Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. All rights reserved, use only with permission. Page | 3 Proposal for City of West Sacramento
George Kristoff Water Treatment Plant Sludge Pond Monitoring September 13, 2024
nitrogen will be analyzed using USEPA Methods 351.2 and 353.2, respectively. Total trihalomethanes will be analyzed via USEPA method 8260B. The samples will be analyzed by Eurofins under subcontract to Geosyntec.

Geosyntec assumes that following past precedent, purge water will be discharged to the ground surface, taking care to not allow purge water to reach nearby surface water bodies (e.g., Sacramento River).

Task 2: Quarterly Monitoring Report Preparation and Delivery Geosyntec will prepare three quarterly reports that will contain a summary of the quarterly monitoring and sampling events performed during the first, second, and third quarters of each year. The reports will include a narrative description of the field preparation tasks, monitoring, sampling, and handling activities, including all field documentation.

The groundwater analytical data will be tabulated and presented on figures and charts compared to groundwater trigger concentrations presented in the MRP. Groundwater monitoring data will be used to prepare a potentiometric surface map for each event. If necessary, Geosyntec will work with City staff to fully document any violation of the WDR or MRP requirements.

In addition, this task includes presentation and discussion of the wastewater flow monitoring results to the sanitary sewer and each sludge drying pond. The analytical wastewater data will be presented in tabular form. If no wastewater was discharged to the sludge drying ponds and samples were not collected, then the quarterly report will explicitly state these conditions. Geosyntec assumes that the City will provide sludge drying pond monthly monitoring data, which will include dissolved oxygen readings, freeboard observations, pH measurements, field meter calibration sheets, summary of sludge drying bed inspection, and any corrective actions implemented during the quarter. Geosyntec will arrange these data in a tabular format by month and discuss within the report text.

This task also includes data verification of the laboratory analytical results for each sample collected. The data will be verified in terms of accuracy, precision, and completeness. In general, the verification will include review of the sample results, field quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) samples, method detection limits, method reporting limits, sample holding times, method blanks, surrogate spike recoveries, and calculation of relative percent differences of duplicate samples. Any data qualifiers resulting from the validation process will be included in the report. All collected data will be compiled into a project-specific database using industry-standard database software (e.g., Microsoft SQL Server) to efficiently prepare the requisite figures, charts, and tables, as well as to support any future ad hoc data analysis requests.

Draft reports will be provided to the City for review no later than two weeks prior to the reporting deadline specified in the MRP, and final reports will be compiled and submitted to CVRWQCB by the reporting deadline.

Task 3: Annual Monitoring Report Preparation and Delivery Geosyntec assumes that the Annual Monitoring Report will include the components described above in Task 2 for the fourth quarter and will also include the annual reporting requirements presented in the WDR, as summarized below.

The Annual Monitoring Report will include concentration versus time graphs for each individual constituent using all available historic data. Geosyntec will evaluate the groundwater quality in the Site subsurface to determine if any concentrations exceeded compliance triggers at any time during the calendar year by comparing the annual average concentration per well to the trigger concentrations provided in the MRP. Geosyntec will also evaluate the quality of the wastewater and the groundwater by comparing each respective annual average concentration of the wastewater effluent data to the annual average concentration of the groundwater data.

The Annual Monitoring Report will include a summary of the solids/sludge disposal monitoring requirements for the calendar year as presented in the WDR (i.e., annual production totals, disposal methods, analytical results required 179 © 2024 Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. All rights reserved, use only with permission. Page | 4 Proposal for City of West Sacramento
George Kristoff Water Treatment Plant Sludge Pond Monitoring September 13, 2024
for disposal, and steps taken to reduce nuisance conditions). The report will also include a discussion of compliance and corrective actions implemented to bring the discharge into full compliance with the WDR. Geosyntec will perform an evaluation of the treatment facility performance related to capacity issues, system problems, and a projection of anticipated flows during the next calendar year. Geosyntec assumes that the City will supply the necessary data and system performance data to complete these evaluations. As applicable, Geosyntec will evaluate and discuss waste constituent reduction efforts implemented, treatment and control measures, and evaluate the effectiveness based on monitoring data. Geosyntec will highlight any data gaps or deficiencies/redundancies in the monitoring and reporting programs. A discussion of any violations during the reporting period and corrective actions planned or implemented will be included in the report.

Draft reports will be provided to the City for review no later than two weeks prior to the reporting deadline specified in the MRP, and final reports will be compiled and submitted to CVRWQCB by the reporting deadline.

Professional Limitations
Geosyntec will perform its services to the City with due care as evidenced by other peers within our professional industry at the time and location our services are rendered.

This proposal does not include:
• Technical evaluations and/or action plans triggered by groundwater trigger concentration exceedances; • Design, permitting, and installation of new groundwater monitoring wells; or • Rehabilitation/disinfection of existing groundwater monitoring wells.

Should circumstances require any of the above services, Geosyntec will provide a supplemental scope of work and an estimate upon request.
180
© 2024 Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. All rights reserved, use only with permission. Page | 1 Proposal for City of West Sacramento
George Kristoff Water Treatment Plant Sludge Pond Monitoring September 13, 2024
D. Cost Proposal
The cost for Geosyntec to execute the proposed Scope of Work was developed on a time and materials basis. Costs for the contract term will include monitoring and reporting beginning in fourth quarter 2024 through third quarter 2027. Detailed cost breakdowns are provided below for the three tasks as described in the Technical Project Approach. Geosyntec is pleased to offer a discounted subcontractor mark-up for this project. Industry-standard subcontractor mark-ups are typically between 10 and 12%; however, Geosyntec is including a reduced subcontractor mark-up at a rate of 5% in this proposal. Geosyntec is also offering discounted staff labor rates representing only a 5% increase from our 2021 rates included in our previous proposal and under which the current contract has been executed. Furthermore, with efficiency gains and workflow improvements Geosyntec has made during our time providing services to the City, we are pleased to report that our costs for performing Tasks 2 and 3 below represent approximately $400 in savings per year.

Task 1: Quarterly Monitoring and Sampling Events
Geosyntec’s quarterly costs are $3,150 per quarter. The total quarterly monitoring and sampling event costs for the contract term (i.e., fourth quarter 2024 through third quarter 2027) are $37,800.

Table 1: Quarterly Event Cost Breakdown
Category/Item Rate Unit No. Units Cost
Geosyntec Labor
Senior Professional $226 hrs 2 $452
Senior Staff Professional $154 hrs 5 $772
Project Administrator $71 hrs 1 $71
Geosyntec Labor Subtotal $1,295
Subcontractors (Including 5% mark-up)
Confluence $860 event 1 $860
Eurofins $995 event 1 $995
Subcontractors Subtotal $1,855
Geosyntec Total per Event $3,150
Task 2: Quarterly Monitoring Report Preparation and Delivery Geosyntec’s costs for preparing each quarterly monitoring report are $2,684. The total cost for preparing quarterly monitoring reports for the contract term (i.e., first through third quarters, 2025 through 2027) are $24,156.

Table 2: Quarterly Reporting Cost Breakdown
Category/Item Rate Unit No. Units Cost
Geosyntec Labor
Senior Professional $226 hrs 4 $903
Project Professional $202 hrs 2 $403
Senior Staff Professional $154 hrs 8 $1,235
Project Administrator $71 hrs 2 $143
Geosyntec Total per Report $2,684
181
© 2024 Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. All rights reserved, use only with permission. Page | 2 Proposal for City of West Sacramento
George Kristoff Water Treatment Plant Sludge Pond Monitoring September 13, 2024
Task 3: Annual Monitoring Report Preparation and Delivery Geosyntec’s costs for preparing each annual monitoring report are $4,280. The total cost for preparing annual monitoring reports for the contract term (i.e., fourth quarters 2024, 2025, and 2026) are $12,840.

Table 3: Annual Reporting Cost Breakdown
Category/Item Rate Unit No. Units Cost
Geosyntec Labor
Senior Principal $267 hrs 1 $267
Senior Professional $226 hrs 4 $903
Project Professional $202 hrs 4 $806
Senior Staff Professional $154 hrs 14 $2,161
Project Administrator $71 hrs 2 $143
Geosyntec Total per Report $4,280
Total Contract Amount
Geosyntec’s proposed costs for each year of the contract term are $24,932, and the total proposed costs for the contract term are $74,796. This includes all services required to complete the Scope of Work and fulfill the City’s obligations under the WDR and MRP from fourth quarter 2024 through third quarter 2027.

One-Year Renewal Option Terms
Geosyntec does not anticipate costs to deviate substantially should the City exercise their option to extend the contract for one or both one-year option terms. However, Geosyntec requests the City provide an opportunity for Geosyntec to revise costs in accordance with any increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) between the date of this proposal and the third quarter 2027.

Attachment 1: Geosyntec Consultants 2024 Rate Schedule
182
© 2024 Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. All rights reserved, use only with permission. Page | 3 Proposal for City of West Sacramento
George Kristoff Water Treatment Plant Sludge Pond Monitoring September 13, 2024
ATTACHMENT 1 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS 2024 RATE SCHEDULE
Rate/Hour
Staff Professional $133
Senior Staff Professional $154
Professional $176
Project Professional $202
Senior Professional $226
Principal $247
Senior Principal $267
Technician I $ 69
Technician II $ 74
Senior Technician I $ 79
Senior Technician II $ 87
Site Manager I $ 97
Site Manager II $105
Construction Manager I $121
Construction Manager II $130
Senior Designer
Designer
$172
$141
Senior Drafter/Senior CADD Operator $126
Drafter/CADD Operator/Artist $110
Project Administrator $ 71
Clerical $ 51
Direct Expenses Cost plus 10%
Subcontract Services Cost plus 5%
Specialized Computer Applications (per hour) $ 12
Personal Automobile (per mile) Current Gov’t Rate
Photocopies (per page) $ .08
Rates are provided confidentially and are client- and project-specific.

Unless otherwise agreed, rates will be adjusted annually based on a minimum of the Producer Price Index for Engineering Services.

Rates for field equipment, health and safety equipment, and graphical supplies presented upon request.

Construction management fee presented upon request.
183
Geosyntec Consultants
PWO24-274 – Sludge Pond Monitoring
Expires on 12/31/27

EXHIBIT B
Schedule of Performance
Contract Start Date 01/01/2025
Contract End Date 12/31/2027
184
Geosyntec Consultants
PWO24-274 – Sludge Pond Monitoring
Expires on 12/31/27

EXHIBIT C
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR CODE § 3700
[Labor Code § 1861]
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
By:

Arthur Forma, Senior Principal, Project
Director
185
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT.

MEETING DATE: November 6, 2024 ITEM # 14
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF UPDATES TO PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULE,

APPROVAL OF JOB DESCRIPTION AND AUTHORIZED POSITON LIST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION 24-113 APPROVING RELATED BUDGET

ADJUSTMENTS
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X ] Staff
[ ] Other
Kaitlyn Montez, Sr. Human Resources Analyst
City Manager’s Office
ATTACHMENT [ X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [ X ] Action

OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this report is to seek City Council approval for proposed adoption of the Planning Manager job description; updates to the publicly available pay schedule FY 2024/25 and Authorized Position List for FY 2024/25; and adoption Resolution 24-113 approving related budget adjustments.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve the new job classification description for Planning Manager;

2. Approve the amended and updated publicly available pay schedule (Classification Plan) for Fiscal Year 2024/25;

3. Approve the amended and updated Authorized Position List (APL) for Fiscal Year 2024/25; and

4. Adopt Resolution 24-113 approving appropriation amendments for the changes outlined this staff report.

BACKGROUND
Pursuant to City Personnel Rules, Section 3.4, each position in the City is required to be assigned to an appropriate classification. For each classification, a written description of the classification is required to be prepared by the City Manager and approved by the City Council. The description must include the official title of the classification and the minimum qualifications required for admission in the classification. When new classifications are added or changes in duties and responsibilities or qualifications for existing classifications are required, the City Council must approve such descriptions.

The Authorized Position List (APL) identifies the number of positions and their respective classification titles by budget unit. Staff must bring an updated Authorized Position List to the City Council for approval whenever there are changes to the number(s) of positions or budget unit(s).

The Publicly Available Pay schedule (Classification Plan) establishes the monthly and annual salary ranges for all regular authorized positions as well as the pay schedule for the Mayor, City Council members, and all extra help positions in the City. CalPERS requires the City bring updated salary ranges (Classification Plan) to the City Council whenever there are changes to the salary ranges or job titles.

In addition, the Fire Department has been awarded the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) grant, allowing the City to hire nine new firefighters. This federal grant aims to enhance public safety by providing funding to fire departments to increase their staffing and deployment capabilities. The SAFER grant will provide funding for these firefighter positions for a period of three years. As the end of the grant period approaches, the City will need to develop a sustainability plan to maintain funding for the positions beyond the initial three-year funding period.

ANALYSIS
Job Classification Descriptions:

The Community Development Department proposes to eliminate the Principal Planner classification and adopt a new Planning Manager job classification, which stems from a recent unsuccessful recruitment effort. This change is driven by the need to align the Planning Division job titles with industry standards and accurately reflect the role's responsibilities and increased qualifications. By adopting the Planning Manager title, the Community Development Department aims to clearly indicate that this is a division manager level position, comparable to other similar roles within the organization. This adjustment will not only enhance the position's appeal to potential candidates but also ensure internal consistency in our organizational structure. The new 186
Updates To Publicly Available Pay Schedule, And Authorized Position List For Fiscal Year 2024/25.

November 6, 2024

Planning Manager role will maintain the same salary range as other division manager level classifications, reinforcing its status and importance within our hierarchy. This strategic move is expected to improve recruitment outcomes and better represent the leadership and managerial aspects of the role in the Planning Division.

Publicly Available Pay Schedule (Classification Plan):

The City of West Sacramento’s (City) publicly available pay schedule identifies job classifications that have been approved by the City Council and the rates of pay for each classification at each step. The requested change to the publicly available pay schedule is a result of the following:
 Addition of the Planning Manager classification to the Management Employee Group, $10,680 - $12,979/mo; and
 Adjustment of the Deputy Fire Chief range to be aligned with the Deputy Police Chief range, $13,569 - $16,491/mo in the Safety Management Employee Group; and  Correction to August 21, 2024, salary schedule which inadvertently left off the salary range for Community Investment Principal Planner in the Specialists & Professionals Employee Group, which had been adopted, $10,066 - $12,233/mo.

Authorized Position List: The Authorized Position List FY 2024/25 reflects the following proposed amendments:

Date Dept Approved
By Amendment
11/6/2024 Community Development City Council Eliminate 1.0 FTE Principal Planner from 650-9311 and add 1.0 FTE Planning Manager to 650-9311.
11/6/2024 Fire City Council
Add 9.0 FTE Firefighters to 256-9158. Eliminate 6.0
FTE firefighters from 101-9151. Add 3.0 FTE Fire
Engineers to 101-9151. Add 3.0 FTE Fire Captains to
101-9151.

The City applied for and was awarded a Staffing for Adequate Fire Emergency Response (SAFER) grant from FEMA to add nine (9) firefighter positions to allow the City to reinstate Engine #45. The grant award provides up to $5.2 million over three years to fund nine firefighter positions. In order to adequately staff Engine #45, three existing firefighter positions will be upgraded to Fire Engineer, and three existing Firefighter positions will be upgraded to Fire Captain. The City’s general fund will be required to cover the difference in cost between what the SAFER grant award will cover and the actual positions needed to adequately staff an engine for 24/7 emergency response. The fire academy starts in January and ends in June 2025. To fill these new positions, changes to the Authorized Position List are required. Engine #45 will be reinstated in once the positions are filled, the new firefighters graduate from the academy, and the existing firefighter positions are upgraded to adequately staff the reinstated engine. Given the significant cost required to be borne by the General Fund and lack of current budget capacity to fund those costs, the position upgrades are proposed for June 2025. However, the additional revenue from the passage of Measure O in November, and Council approval of the midyear budget in January, would allow the firefighter positions to be upgraded and Engine #45 reinstated to service effective January 2025.

Even though changes to fire positions will not be implemented until a later date, staff is proposing to upgrade the authorized position list now for several strategic reasons. Updating the list in advance ensures that the City is prepared for the eventual staffing changes, allowing for a smoother transition when the time comes. In addition, having the positions authorized early gives staff the opportunity to begin the recruitment process well in advance, ensuring qualified candidates are ready when needed. In the interim, until Engine #45 is reinstated, these positions will be underfilled at the current staffing levels. This approach allows us to maintain current operations while being fully prepared for future expansion.

Environmental Considerations
Not applicable
Commission Recommendation
Not applicable
187
Updates To Publicly Available Pay Schedule, And Authorized Position List For Fiscal Year 2024/25.

November 6, 2024

Strategic Plan Integration
These recommendations support the City Council’s Mission to provide Quality Municipal Services and a City government that is financially sound with a superior workforce.

Alternatives
The City Council may choose not to approve the Planning Manager job description, publicly available pay schedule (classification plan) and the Authorized Position List for Fiscal Year 2024/25, or the Council may elect to approve only part of the recommended action. Declining to approve a revised APL that includes the nine new firefighter positions is not recommended as the grant performance period begins in March and if the new positions are not filled, the City will lose grant funding for the much needed positions to reinstate Engine #45 and improve Fire Emergency response to city residents and businesses.

Coordination and Review
This report has been coordinated between the City Manager's Office, Human Resources Division, and the Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
A total of $5,222,934 was awarded for the addition and hiring of nine (9) new firefighter positions under the SAFER grant over a period of three years. The cost of 9 fire recruits for January through June 2025 (fire academy) is $510,750 which will be fully covered by the SAFER grant. Costs to be borne by the General Fund total $580,000 to cover the differential to upgrade six existing firefighter positions to 3 fire engineers and 3 fire captains, annual financing payment for a new Fire Engine, personal protective equipment for nine new positions, and drill instructor backfill for the Fire Academy. Ongoing annual costs include the annual lease financing estimated at $130,000 and the upgraded firefighter positions at $330,000 annually. Additional ongoing funds will be required for apparatus maintenance and other costs which will be requested as part of the upcoming midyear or biennial budget.

Additional costs of approximately $50,000 are expected to cover recruitment and hiring costs, including background investigations, medical evaluations, and livescan costs. These costs will be funded through a carryover of unused one-time budget from FY 2023/24.

The annual cost for the revision to the Fire Deputy Chief pay scale is $31,110. For the remainder of the fiscal year, an appropriation of $20,750 is requested.

There is no budget impact to FY 2024/25 for the Planning Manager position. The existing budget for the Principal Planner, along with savings during the time the position is vacant during recruitment, will more than cover the cost of the Planning Manager position, once hired, for the remainder of the fiscal year. Ongoing annual impacts for this change are expected to be approximately $10,000.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Job classification description for Planning Manager

2. Amended and updated publicly available pay schedule (Classification Plan) for Fiscal Year 2024/25

3. Amended and updated Authorized Position List (APL) for Fiscal Year 2024/25

4. Resolution 24-113
188

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

PLANNING MANAGER
DEFINITION: The Planning Manager, plans, organizes, directs, reviews and coordinates the work of professional, technical and administrative staff related to all programs and activities of the Planning Division in the Community Development Department, including current and advanced planning and business licensing functions; manages the effective use of the City’s planning resources to improve organizational productivity and both internal and external customer service; and outside agencies and organizations; oversees and manages current and advanced planning and environmental review; and provides highly responsible and complex support to the Director of Community Development and others. The Planning Manager also serves as the primary staff to the Planning Commission. The Planning Manager is an at-will position that is appointed by and sits at the pleasure of the City Manager.

SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED: Receives general direction from the Director of Community Development, and exercises direction and supervision to assigned supervisory, professional, technical, and other assigned staff.

CLASS CHARACTERISTICS: The Planning Manager is a single position management level classification that is responsible for planning, organizing, reviewing, and evaluating all current planning programs, projects, and activities of the Planning Division. Responsibilities include developing and implementing policies and procedures for assigned programs, budget administration and reporting, and program evaluation. Incumbents serve as a professional-level resource for organizational, managerial, and operational analyses and studies. Performance of the work requires the use of considerable independence, initiative, and discretion within established guidelines.

EXAMPLES OF ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS: (Illustrative Only): Management reserves the right to add, modify, change or rescind the work assignments of different positions and to make reasonable accommodations so that qualified employees can perform the essential functions of the job.
 In consultation with Planning Division staff and the Community Development Director, leads the development of an annual Planning Division work program, including project/initiative prioritization and assignment of roles;
 Interprets, applies, and monitors laws, rules, and regulations related to planning matters including enforcement, land use, environmental review and determinations, housing, subdivision, and general planning laws and regulations.  Manages and participates in the development and implementation of goals, objectives, policies, and priorities for the division; recommends within departmental policy, appropriate service and staffing levels; recommends and administers policies and procedures. 189

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
Planning Manager (Continued)
2  Recommends Division-wide goals and objectives; assists in the development and implementation of policies, procedures, and standards to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
 Develops and standardizes procedures and methods to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of planning services, projects, and activities; assesses and monitors workload, administrative and support systems, and internal reporting relationships; identifies and recommends opportunities for improvement to the Director.  Participates in recruitment and selection of assigned personnel; motivates, supervises and evaluates assigned personnel; provides or coordinates staff training and activities; works with employees on performance issues; implements performance improvement and personnel procedures as necessary.
 Provides highly complex assistance to the Director; prepares, reviews and edits staff reports related to planning activities, projects, and services; presents reports to and advises the City Council, Planning Commission, and other City, regional and community-based commissions, committees, and boards related to a wide variety of planning matters; serves as the primary Secretary to the Planning Commission; leads Planning Division staff meetings, provides staffing to regular meetings such as Project Review Committee (PRC) meetings, in coordination with other departments involved in the development project review process; performs a variety of public relations and outreach work related to assigned activities.  Advises staff on interpretations of the Zoning Ordinance, General Plan, Municipal Code, State Planning Law, California Environmental Quality Act, and other regulatory standards; resolves difficult problems involving code interpretation beyond the ability or authority of professional planning staff. May serve as the City’s Zoning Administrator if assigned by the Community Development Director.
 Serves as source of information for developers, engineers, property owners, and contractors regarding land use applications and general municipal planning programs, projects, and functions; represents the division, department, and City in disputes and litigation; facilitates community participation through a continual dialogue with residents on major projects.  Oversees the dissemination of planning policy, land use and zoning regulatory information to the general public.
 Conducts a variety of organizational and operational studies; recommends modifications to programs, policies, and procedures, as appropriate.
 Oversees, analyzes, and prepares information regarding social, economic, population, and land use trends.
 Oversees, develops, and implements current and advanced planning program activities including the preparation and review of environmental impact reports and other environmental documents, and issuance of land use permits and approvals; prepares longrange planning documents; provides information and technical assistance regarding City development requirements; participates in public meetings as necessary.  Participates in the development and implementation of the Planning Division budget; reviews budget expenditures; recommends necessary staff, equipment, materials, and supplies needed to support the Division and Department work plan.  Attends and participates in professional organization events and meetings; stays informed of new trends and innovations in planning; researches emerging technologies and best practices, and their applicability to the City’s planning needs. 190

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
Planning Manager (Continued)
3  Monitors changes in State and Federal regulations that may affect operations; implements policy and procedural changes after execution.
 Receives, investigates, and responds to problems and complaints in a professional manner; identifies and reports findings and takes necessary corrective action.  Assists the Director of Community Development with special projects, as needed. Reviews, assigns, and oversees the processing of development permit applications including those for new subdivisions, lot line adjustments, variances, use permits, and general plan and zoning amendments; monitors workflow; reviews and evaluates work products, methods, and procedures.
 Prepares, negotiates and administers requests for proposals, contracts, and agreements.  Performs related duties as assigned.

QUALIFICATIONS:

Knowledge of: Administrative principles and practices, including goal setting, program development, implementation, and evaluation, and project management; Principles and practices of budget development and administration; Principles and practices of employee supervision, including work planning, assignment review and evaluation, discipline, and the training of staff in work procedures; Principles and practices of leadership and organizational development; Applicable Federal, State, and local laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, and organizational policies and procedures relevant to city planning, development, policy, implementation and environmental review; General, specific, and master plans, current planning and the development review process; Geographic, socio-economic, transportation, political, and other elements related to planning; Site planning, urban and architectural design principles; Recent and on-going current literature, and sources of information related to planning best practices; Practices of researching planning and design issues, evaluating alternatives, making sound recommendations, and preparing and presenting effective staff reports; Methods and techniques of effective technical report preparation and presentation; Techniques for providing a high level of customer service by effectively managing the public, vendors, contractors, and City staff.

Skill in: Providing administrative and professional leadership and direction for the Planning functions of the City; Recommending and implementing goals, objectives, and practices for providing effective and efficient services; Administering complex, technical, and sensitive planning, development, environmental and related programs in an independent and cooperative manner; Planning, organizing, assigning, reviewing, and evaluating the work of staff; Evaluating and developing improvements in operations, procedures, policies, or methods; Researching, analyzing, and evaluating new service delivery methods, procedures, and techniques; Preparing clear and concise reports, correspondence, policies, procedures, and other written materials in a timely manner; Analyzing, interpreting, summarizing, and presenting administrative and technical information and data in an effective manner; Conducting complex research projects, evaluating alternatives, making sound recommendations, and preparing effective technical staff reports; Establishing and maintaining a variety of filing, record keeping, and tracking systems; Understanding, interpreting, and applying all pertinent laws, codes, regulations, policies and procedures, and standards relevant to work performed; Effectively representing the division, department and the City in meetings with governmental agencies; community groups; various 191

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
Planning Manager (Continued)
4 business, professional, and regulatory organizations; and in meetings with individuals; Using tact, initiative, prudence, and independent judgment within general policy, procedural, and legal guidelines; Establishing, maintaining, and fostering positive and effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work.

EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE: Any combination of training and experience which would provide the required knowledge and skill. A typical way to obtain the required knowledge and skill would be:

Education: Bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university with major coursework in planning, urban studies, community development, public or business administration, or a related field. Possession of a Master’s degree in either city and regional planning, urban studies, real estate development, public administration with emphasis in city planning, or related field is highly desirable.

Experience: Seven (7) years of responsible, professional urban planning experience, including at least two (2) years providing direction or supervision to professional staff.

LICENSES AND CERTIFICATES: Possession of, or ability to obtain, a valid California driver license. Possession of an American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) certification is desirable.

WORKING CONDITIONS: May serve as staff to commissions and may be required to attend off-hour meetings.

PHYSICAL DEMANDS: Mobility to work in a standard office or construction environment, use standard office equipment and attend off-site meetings. On an intermittent basis, sit at a desk for long periods of time; intermittently walk, stand, bend, squat, twist, and reach while performing office duties; mobility to occasionally traverse uneven terrain, periodically standing, stooping, bending, climbing and kneeling to perform inspections; on occasion may be required to work in exposure to weather. Manual dexterity to use standard office equipment and supplies and small tools and to manipulate both single sheets of paper and large document holders (manuals, binders, etc.); vision to read handwritten and printed material and a computer screen; hearing and speech to communicate in person and by telephone; ability to lift and carry items weighing up to 25 pounds such as files, manuals, or small tools and equipment for distances up to 50 feet.

ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: Employees generally work in an office environment with moderate noise levels, controlled temperature conditions and no direct exposure to hazardous physical substances. Employees may also work in a construction or field environment including inclement weather conditions and construction and traffic hazards. Employees may interact with upset staff and/or public and private representatives in interpreting and enforcing department guidelines, policies and procedures.

Adopted: 11/6/2024
Revised:

Maintenance Update:

Title Change:
192

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
Planning Manager (Continued)
5 Job Category: Administrators / Managers
Bargaining Unit: N/A
Employee Group: Management
At-Will:  Yes  No
Form 700:  Yes  No
FLSA Status:  Non-Exempt  Exempt
193
City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024
City of West Sacramento
Salary Schedule
Fiscal Year 2024 / 2025

Battalion Chief's Association City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION TITLE

BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Fire Battalion Chief BCA 7/1/24 $42.4739 $53.1676 $10,307 $12,902 $123,684 $154,824 *Based on 2912 annual hours

City Manager City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION
TITLE

BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I City Manager 8/26/2023 $136.9500 $23,738 $284,856

Confidential City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION TITLE

EMPLOYEE
GROUP
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Administrative Assistant CONFID 7/1/24 $30.9058 $37.6558 $5,357 $6,527 $64,284 $78,324 $5,357 $5,491 $5,628 $5,769 $5,913 $6,061 $6,213 $6,368 $6,527 Administrative Clerk I CONFID 7/1/24 $22.9904 $28.0154 $3,985 $4,856 $47,820 $58,272 $3,985 $4,085 $4,187 $4,292 $4,399 $4,509 $4,622 $4,738 $4,856 Administrative Clerk II CONFID 7/1/24 $25.3038 $30.8250 $4,386 $5,343 $52,632 $64,116 $4,386 $4,496 $4,608 $4,723 $4,841 $4,962 $5,086 $5,213 $5,343 Administrative Clerk III CONFID 7/1/24 $26.7577 $32.6019 $4,638 $5,651 $55,656 $67,812 $4,638 $4,754 $4,873 $4,995 $5,120 $5,248 $5,379 $5,513 $5,651 Executive Assistant to the City Manager CONFID 7/1/24 $32.8327 $39.9981 $5,691 $6,933 $68,292 $83,196 $5,691 $5,833 $5,979 $6,128 $6,281 $6,438 $6,599 $6,764 $6,933 Human Resources & Payroll Technician I CONFID 7/1/24 $26.7577 $32.6019 $4,638 $5,651 $55,656 $67,812 $4,638 $4,754 $4,873 $4,995 $5,120 $5,248 $5,379 $5,513 $5,651 Human Resources & Payroll Technician II CONFID 7/1/24 $30.9058 $37.6558 $5,357 $6,527 $64,284 $78,324 $5,357 $5,491 $5,628 $5,769 $5,913 $6,061 $6,213 $6,368 $6,527 Payroll Administrator CONFID 7/1/24 $34.8231 $42.4385 $6,036 $7,356 $72,432 $88,272 $6,036 $6,187 $6,342 $6,501 $6,664 $6,831 $7,002 $7,177 $7,356

197
Elected Officials City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE
GROUP
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY
MINIMU
M
HOURLY
MAXIMU
M

MONTHLY
MINIMU
M

MONTHLY
MAXIMU
M
ANNUAL
MINIMU
M
ANNUAL
MAXIMU
M

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I City Council Member ELECTED OFFICIAL 1/1/87 $300 $3,600 Mayor ELECTED OFFICIAL 1/1/87 $300 $3,600

Executive Management City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE
GROUP
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Assistant City Manager EXECMGM 7/1/24 $93.5019 $113.6331 $16,207 $19,696 $194,484 $236,357 Deputy City Manager/Director of Innovation & Technology EXECMGM 7/1/24 $80.1462 $97.3998 $13,892 $16,883 $166,704 $202,592 Director of Capital Projects EXECMGM 7/1/24 $80.1462 $97.3998 $13,892 $16,883 $166,704 $202,592 Director of Community Development EXECMGM 7/1/24 $80.1462 $97.3998 $13,892 $16,883 $166,704 $202,592 Director of Economic Development & Housing EXECMGM 7/1/24 $80.1462 $97.3998 $13,892 $16,883 $166,704 $202,592 Director of Finance EXECMGM 7/1/24 $80.1462 $97.3998 $13,892 $16,883 $166,704 $202,592 Director of Parks & Recreation EXECMGM 7/1/24 $80.1462 $97.3998 $13,892 $16,883 $166,704 $202,592 Director of Public Works Operations & Maintenance EXECMGM 7/1/24 $80.1462 $97.3998 $13,892 $16,883 $166,704 $202,592 Fire Chief EXECMGM 7/1/24 $89.0481 $108.2220 $15,435 $18,758 $185,220 $225,102 Flood General Manager EXECMGM 7/1/24 $71.2385 $86.5776 $12,348 $15,007 $148,176 $180,081 Police Chief EXECMGM 7/1/24 $89.0481 $108.2220 $15,435 $18,758 $185,220 $225,102 Port General Manager EXECMGM 7/1/24 $71.2385 $86.5776 $12,348 $15,007 $148,176 $180,081

Firefighter's Association City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION TITLE BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Fire Captain FFA 6/1/24 $39.5192 $48.0412 $9,590 $11,658 $115,080 $139,896 $9,590 $10,070 $10,574 $11,103 $11,658 Fire Engineer FFA 6/1/24 $34.4217 $41.8434 $8,353 $10,154 $100,236 $121,848 $8,353 $8,771 $9,210 $9,670 $10,154 Firefighter FFA 6/1/24 $31.5495 $38.3489 $7,656 $9,306 $91,872 $111,672 $7,656 $8,039 $8,441 $8,863 $9,306 *Based on 2912 annual hours

Local 39 City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION TITLE BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Accounting Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $25.3154 $30.8365 $4,388 $5,345 $52,656 $64,140 $4,388 $4,498 $4,610 $4,725 $4,843 $4,964 $5,088 $5,215 $5,345 Accounting Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.4596 $34.6788 $4,933 $6,011 $59,196 $72,132 $4,933 $5,056 $5,182 $5,312 $5,445 $5,581 $5,721 $5,864 $6,011 Accounting Technician III LOCAL39 7/1/24 $30.5885 $37.2750 $5,302 $6,461 $63,624 $77,532 $5,302 $5,435 $5,571 $5,710 $5,853 $5,999 $6,149 $6,303 $6,461 Chief Facilities Maintenance Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.6846 $45.9115 $6,532 $7,958 $78,384 $95,496 $6,532 $6,695 $6,862 $7,034 $7,210 $7,390 $7,575 $7,764 $7,958 Chief Maintenance Worker (Possess a D3
and/or hired after 7/1/19) LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.7750 $39.9404 $5,681 $6,923 $68,172 $83,076 $5,681 $5,823 $5,969 $6,118 $6,271 $6,428 $6,589 $6,754 $6,923 Chief Parks & Grounds Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $30.5885 $37.2750 $5,302 $6,461 $63,624 $77,532 $5,302 $5,435 $5,571 $5,710 $5,853 $5,999 $6,149 $6,303 $6,461 Chief Treatment Plant Mechanic LOCAL39 7/1/24 $41.6942 $50.8038 $7,227 $8,806 $86,724 $105,672 $7,227 $7,408 $7,593 $7,783 $7,978 $8,177 $8,381 $8,591 $8,806 Clerk LOCAL39 7/1/24 $20.9769 $25.5519 $3,636 $4,429 $43,632 $53,148 $3,636 $3,727 $3,820 $3,915 $4,013 $4,113 $4,216 $4,321 $4,429 Clerk, Senior LOCAL39 7/1/24 $22.8000 $27.7788 $3,952 $4,815 $47,424 $57,780 $3,952 $4,051 $4,152 $4,256 $4,362 $4,471 $4,583 $4,698 $4,815 Electrical Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $39.1038 $47.6423 $6,778 $8,258 $81,336 $99,096 $6,778 $6,947 $7,121 $7,299 $7,481 $7,668 $7,860 $8,057 $8,258 Engineering Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.7250 $34.9962 $4,979 $6,066 $59,748 $72,792 $4,979 $5,103 $5,231 $5,362 $5,496 $5,633 $5,774 $5,918 $6,066 Engineering Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.2212 $39.2596 $5,585 $6,805 $67,020 $81,660 $5,585 $5,725 $5,868 $6,015 $6,165 $6,319 $6,477 $6,639 $6,805 Engineering Technician III LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.2346 $45.3635 $6,454 $7,863 $77,448 $94,356 $6,454 $6,615 $6,780 $6,949 $7,123 $7,301 $7,484 $7,671 $7,863 Engineering/GIS Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $39.0981 $47.6308 $6,777 $8,256 $81,324 $99,072 $6,777 $6,946 $7,120 $7,298 $7,480 $7,667 $7,859 $8,055 $8,256 Equipment Mechanic I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $26.3712 $32.1288 $4,571 $5,569 $54,852 $66,828 $4,571 $4,685 $4,802 $4,922 $5,045 $5,171 $5,300 $5,433 $5,569 Equipment Mechanic II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.3558 $34.5519 $4,915 $5,989 $58,980 $71,868 $4,915 $5,038 $5,164 $5,293 $5,425 $5,561 $5,700 $5,843 $5,989 Facilities Maintenance Aide LOCAL39 7/1/24 $19.2231 $23.4173 $3,332 $4,059 $39,984 $48,708 $3,332 $3,415 $3,500 $3,587 $3,677 $3,769 $3,863 $3,960 $4,059 Facilities Maintenance Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $29.6538 $36.1269 $5,140 $6,262 $61,680 $75,144 $5,140 $5,268 $5,400 $5,535 $5,673 $5,815 $5,960 $6,109 $6,262 Facilities Maintenance Worker, Senior LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.6365 $39.7615 $5,657 $6,892 $67,884 $82,704 $5,657 $5,798 $5,943 $6,092 $6,244 $6,400 $6,560 $6,724 $6,892 Groundskeeper LOCAL39 7/1/24 $20.2385 $24.6577 $3,508 $4,274 $42,096 $51,288 $3,508 $3,596 $3,686 $3,778 $3,872 $3,969 $4,068 $4,170 $4,274 Instrumentation Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $43.3558 $52.8231 $7,515 $9,156 $90,180 $109,872 $7,515 $7,703 $7,896 $8,093 $8,295 $8,502 $8,715 $8,933 $9,156 Maintenance Worker (2) LOCAL39 7/1/24 $26.0538 $31.7538 $4,516 $5,504 $54,192 $66,048 $4,516 $4,629 $4,745 $4,864 $4,986 $5,111 $5,239 $5,370 $5,504 Maintenance Worker, Senior (2) LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.8000 $35.0885 $4,992 $6,082 $59,904 $72,984 $4,992 $5,117 $5,245 $5,376 $5,510 $5,648 $5,789 $5,934 $6,082 Parks & Grounds Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $24.8077 $30.2308 $4,300 $5,240 $51,600 $62,880 $4,300 $4,407 $4,517 $4,630 $4,746 $4,865 $4,987 $5,112 $5,240 Parks & Grounds Worker, Senior LOCAL39 7/1/24 $27.1269 $33.0519 $4,702 $5,729 $56,424 $68,748 $4,702 $4,820 $4,940 $5,063 $5,190 $5,320 $5,453 $5,589 $5,729 Permit Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.4538 $34.6673 $4,932 $6,009 $59,184 $72,108 $4,932 $5,055 $5,181 $5,311 $5,444 $5,580 $5,719 $5,862 $6,009 Permit Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $30.5885 $37.2750 $5,302 $6,461 $63,624 $77,532 $5,302 $5,435 $5,571 $5,710 $5,853 $5,999 $6,149 $6,303 $6,461 Planning Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.4654 $34.6846 $4,934 $6,012 $59,208 $72,144 $4,934 $5,057 $5,183 $5,313 $5,446 $5,582 $5,722 $5,865 $6,012 Recreation Coordinator LOCAL39 7/1/24 $25.3269 $30.8481 $4,390 $5,347 $52,680 $64,164 $4,390 $4,500 $4,612 $4,727 $4,845 $4,966 $5,090 $5,217 $5,347 Recreation Supervisor I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $31.6327 $38.5385 $5,483 $6,680 $65,796 $80,160 $5,483 $5,620 $5,760 $5,904 $6,052 $6,203 $6,358 $6,517 $6,680 Recreation Supervisor II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.1635 $42.8365 $6,095 $7,425 $73,140 $89,100 $6,095 $6,247 $6,403 $6,563 $6,727 $6,895 $7,067 $7,244 $7,425 Revenue Supervisor LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.1635 $42.8365 $6,095 $7,425 $73,140 $89,100 $6,095 $6,247 $6,403 $6,563 $6,727 $6,895 $7,067 $7,244 $7,425 Secretary LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.3212 $34.5058 $4,909 $5,981 $58,908 $71,772 $4,909 $5,032 $5,158 $5,287 $5,419 $5,554 $5,693 $5,835 $5,981 Senior Water Treatment Plant Operator LOCAL39 7/1/24 $44.6712 $54.4212 $7,743 $9,433 $92,916 $113,196 $7,743 $7,937 $8,135 $8,338 $8,546 $8,760 $8,979 $9,203 $9,433 Special Events Supervisor I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $31.6327 $38.5385 $5,483 $6,680 $65,796 $80,160 $5,483 $5,620 $5,760 $5,904 $6,052 $6,203 $6,358 $6,517 $6,680 Special Events Supervisor II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.1635 $42.8365 $6,095 $7,425 $73,140 $89,100 $6,095 $6,247 $6,403 $6,563 $6,727 $6,895 $7,067 $7,244 $7,425 Stationary Engineer LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.8962 $43.7308 $6,222 $7,580 $74,664 $90,960 $6,222 $6,378 $6,537 $6,700 $6,867 $7,039 $7,215 $7,395 $7,580 Traffic Control & Lighting Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $31.8173 $38.7635 $5,515 $6,719 $66,180 $80,628 $5,515 $5,653 $5,794 $5,939 $6,087 $6,239 $6,395 $6,555 $6,719 Traffic Control & Lighting Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.2346 $45.3635 $6,454 $7,863 $77,448 $94,356 $6,454 $6,615 $6,780 $6,949 $7,123 $7,301 $7,484 $7,671 $7,863 Treatment Plant Mechanic I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $33.8538 $41.2442 $5,868 $7,149 $70,416 $85,788 $5,868 $6,015 $6,165 $6,319 $6,477 $6,639 $6,805 $6,975 $7,149 Treatment Plant Mechanic II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.2346 $45.3635 $6,454 $7,863 $77,448 $94,356 $6,454 $6,615 $6,780 $6,949 $7,123 $7,301 $7,484 $7,671 $7,863 Water Meter Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $26.3712 $32.1288 $4,571 $5,569 $54,852 $66,828 $4,571 $4,685 $4,802 $4,922 $5,045 $5,171 $5,300 $5,433 $5,569 Water Treatment Plant Apprentice LOCAL39 7/1/24 $29.1577 $35.5154 $5,054 $6,156 $60,648 $73,872 $5,054 $5,180 $5,309 $5,442 $5,578 $5,717 $5,860 $6,006 $6,156 Water Treatment Plant Operator II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.9596 $40.1654 $5,713 $6,962 $68,556 $83,544 $5,713 $5,856 $6,002 $6,152 $6,306 $6,464 $6,626 $6,792 $6,962 Water Treatment Plant Operator III LOCAL39 7/1/24 $36.4212 $44.3827 $6,313 $7,693 $75,756 $92,316 $6,313 $6,471 $6,633 $6,799 $6,969 $7,143 $7,322 $7,505 $7,693

SALARY SCHEDULE B

Local 39 City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION TITLE BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Accounting Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $25.3673 $30.8365 $4,397 $5,345 $52,764 $64,140 $4,397 $4,617 $4,848 $5,090 $5,345 Accounting Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.5288 $34.6788 $4,945 $6,011 $59,340 $72,132 $4,945 $5,192 $5,452 $5,725 $6,011 Accounting Technician III LOCAL39 7/1/24 $30.6635 $37.2750 $5,315 $6,461 $63,780 $77,532 $5,315 $5,581 $5,860 $6,153 $6,461 Chief Facilities Maintenance Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.7712 $45.9115 $6,547 $7,958 $78,564 $95,496 $6,547 $6,874 $7,218 $7,579 $7,958 Chief Maintenance Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.3827 $39.3635 $5,613 $6,823 $67,356 $81,876 $5,613 $5,894 $6,189 $6,498 $6,823 Chief Maintenance Worker (Possess a D3
and/or hired after 7/1/19) LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.8558 $39.9404 $5,695 $6,923 $68,340 $83,076 $5,695 $5,980 $6,279 $6,593 $6,923 Chief Parks & Grounds Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $30.6635 $37.2750 $5,315 $6,461 $63,780 $77,532 $5,315 $5,581 $5,860 $6,153 $6,461 Chief Treatment Plant Mechanic LOCAL39 7/1/24 $41.8038 $50.8038 $7,246 $8,806 $86,952 $105,672 $7,246 $7,608 $7,988 $8,387 $8,806 Clerk LOCAL39 7/1/24 $21.0231 $25.5519 $3,644 $4,429 $43,728 $53,148 $3,644 $3,826 $4,017 $4,218 $4,429 Clerk, Senior LOCAL39 7/1/24 $22.8577 $27.7788 $3,962 $4,815 $47,544 $57,780 $3,962 $4,160 $4,368 $4,586 $4,815 Electrical Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $39.1904 $47.6423 $6,793 $8,258 $81,516 $99,096 $6,793 $7,133 $7,490 $7,865 $8,258 Engineering Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.7885 $34.9962 $4,990 $6,066 $59,880 $72,792 $4,990 $5,240 $5,502 $5,777 $6,066 Engineering Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.2962 $39.2596 $5,598 $6,805 $67,176 $81,660 $5,598 $5,878 $6,172 $6,481 $6,805 Engineering Technician III LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.3212 $45.3635 $6,469 $7,863 $77,628 $94,356 $6,469 $6,792 $7,132 $7,489 $7,863 Engineering/GIS Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $39.1846 $47.6308 $6,792 $8,256 $81,504 $99,072 $6,792 $7,132 $7,489 $7,863 $8,256 Equipment Mechanic I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $26.4288 $32.1288 $4,581 $5,569 $54,972 $66,828 $4,581 $4,810 $5,051 $5,304 $5,569 Equipment Mechanic II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.4250 $34.5519 $4,927 $5,989 $59,124 $71,868 $4,927 $5,173 $5,432 $5,704 $5,989 Facilities Maintenance Aide LOCAL39 7/1/24 $19.2692 $23.4173 $3,340 $4,059 $40,080 $48,708 $3,340 $3,507 $3,682 $3,866 $4,059 Facilities Maintenance Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $29.7231 $36.1269 $5,152 $6,262 $61,824 $75,144 $5,152 $5,410 $5,680 $5,964 $6,262 Facilities Maintenance Worker, Senior LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.7115 $39.7615 $5,670 $6,892 $68,040 $82,704 $5,670 $5,953 $6,251 $6,564 $6,892 Groundskeeper LOCAL39 7/1/24 $20.2788 $24.6577 $3,515 $4,274 $42,180 $51,288 $3,515 $3,691 $3,876 $4,070 $4,274 Instrumentation Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $43.4596 $52.8231 $7,533 $9,156 $90,396 $109,872 $7,533 $7,910 $8,305 $8,720 $9,156 Maintenance Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $26.1231 $31.7538 $4,528 $5,504 $54,336 $66,048 $4,528 $4,754 $4,992 $5,242 $5,504 Maintenance Worker, Senior LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.8635 $35.0885 $5,003 $6,082 $60,036 $72,984 $5,003 $5,253 $5,516 $5,792 $6,082 Parks & Grounds Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $24.8654 $30.2308 $4,310 $5,240 $51,720 $62,880 $4,310 $4,526 $4,752 $4,990 $5,240 Parks & Grounds Worker, Senior LOCAL39 7/1/24 $27.1904 $33.0519 $4,713 $5,729 $56,556 $68,748 $4,713 $4,949 $5,196 $5,456 $5,729 Permit Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.5173 $34.6673 $4,943 $6,009 $59,316 $72,108 $4,943 $5,190 $5,450 $5,723 $6,009 Permit Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $30.6635 $37.2750 $5,315 $6,461 $63,780 $77,532 $5,315 $5,581 $5,860 $6,153 $6,461 Planning Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.5346 $34.6846 $4,946 $6,012 $59,352 $72,144 $4,946 $5,193 $5,453 $5,726 $6,012 Recreation Coordinator LOCAL39 7/1/24 $25.3788 $30.8481 $4,399 $5,347 $52,788 $64,164 $4,399 $4,619 $4,850 $5,092 $5,347 Recreation Supervisor I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $31.7019 $38.5385 $5,495 $6,680 $65,940 $80,160 $5,495 $5,770 $6,059 $6,362 $6,680 Recreation Supervisor II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.2385 $42.8365 $6,108 $7,425 $73,296 $89,100 $6,108 $6,413 $6,734 $7,071 $7,425 Revenue Supervisor LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.2385 $42.8365 $6,108 $7,425 $73,296 $89,100 $6,108 $6,413 $6,734 $7,071 $7,425 Secretary LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.3904 $34.5058 $4,921 $5,981 $59,052 $71,772 $4,921 $5,167 $5,425 $5,696 $5,981 Senior Water Treatment Plant Operator LOCAL39 7/1/24 $44.7750 $54.4212 $7,761 $9,433 $93,132 $113,196 $7,761 $8,149 $8,556 $8,984 $9,433 Special Events Supervisor I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $31.7019 $38.5385 $5,495 $6,680 $65,940 $80,160 $5,495 $5,770 $6,059 $6,362 $6,680 Special Events Supervisor II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.2385 $42.8365 $6,108 $7,425 $73,296 $89,100 $6,108 $6,413 $6,734 $7,071 $7,425 Stationary Engineer LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.9769 $43.7308 $6,236 $7,580 $74,832 $90,960 $6,236 $6,548 $6,875 $7,219 $7,580 Traffic Control & Lighting Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $31.8923 $38.7635 $5,528 $6,719 $66,336 $80,628 $5,528 $5,804 $6,094 $6,399 $6,719 Traffic Control & Lighting Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.3212 $45.3635 $6,469 $7,863 $77,628 $94,356 $6,469 $6,792 $7,132 $7,489 $7,863 Treatment Plant Mechanic I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $33.9346 $41.2442 $5,882 $7,149 $70,584 $85,788 $5,882 $6,176 $6,485 $6,809 $7,149 Treatment Plant Mechanic II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.3212 $45.3635 $6,469 $7,863 $77,628 $94,356 $6,469 $6,792 $7,132 $7,489 $7,863 Water Treatment Plant Apprentice (Steps 1-4) LOCAL39 7/1/24 $24.0462 $4,168 $50,016 $4,168 $4,376 $4,595 $4,825 Water Treatment Plant Apprentice (Steps 5-9) LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.5154 $6,156 $73,872 $5,065 $5,318 $5,584 $5,863 $6,156 Water Treatment Plant Operator II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $33.0404 $40.1654 $5,727 $6,962 $68,724 $83,544 $5,727 $6,013 $6,314 $6,630 $6,962 Water Treatment Plant Operator III LOCAL39 7/1/24 $36.5192 $44.3827 $6,330 $7,693 $75,960 $92,316 $6,330 $6,646 $6,978 $7,327 $7,693

SALARY SCHEDULE A

Management City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE
GROUP
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Business Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4827 $67.4308 $9,617 $11,688 $115,404 $140,256 Capital Improvement Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 Chief Building Official MGMT 7/1/24 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 City Clerk MGMT 7/1/24 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 Code Enforcement Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4827 $67.4308 $9,617 $11,688 $115,404 $140,256 Community Investment Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $58.0731 $70.5750 $10,066 $12,233 $120,792 $146,796 Community Investment Principal Planner MGMT 8/21/24 $58.0731 $70.5750 $10,066 $12,233 $120,792 $146,796 Construction & Facilities Development Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 Construction Inspection Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $50.2731 $61.0962 $8,714 $10,590 $104,568 $127,080 Court Liaison Officer MGMT 7/1/24 $38.3654 $46.6269 $6,650 $8,082 $79,800 $96,984 Data Services Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $52.6558 $63.9923 $9,127 $11,092 $109,524 $133,104 Economic Development Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $58.0731 $70.5750 $10,066 $12,233 $120,792 $146,796 Equipment and Facilities Superintendent MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4019 $67.3327 $9,603 $11,671 $115,236 $140,052 Finance Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 Finance Supervisor MGMT 7/1/24 $52.6558 $63.9923 $9,127 $11,092 $109,524 $133,104 Fire Marshal MGMT 7/1/24 $61.5577 $74.8096 $10,670 $12,967 $128,040 $155,604 Flood Protection Manager MGMT 8/21/24 $64.0038 $77.7865 $11,094 $13,483 $133,128 $161,796 Flood Protection Planner MGMT 7/1/24 $52.7192 $64.0731 $9,138 $11,106 $109,656 $133,272 Home Run Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $58.0731 $70.5750 $10,066 $12,233 $120,792 $146,796 Housing Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $58.0731 $70.5750 $10,066 $12,233 $120,792 $146,796 Human Resources Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 Human Resources Supervisor MGMT 7/1/24 $52.6558 $63.9923 $9,127 $11,092 $109,524 $133,104 Information Technology Business Services Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $52.6558 $63.9923 $9,127 $11,092 $109,524 $133,104 Information Technology Operations Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4019 $67.3327 $9,603 $11,671 $115,236 $140,052 Parking Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $58.0731 $70.5750 $10,066 $12,233 $120,792 $146,796 Parks Operations Superintendent MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4019 $67.3327 $9,603 $11,671 $115,236 $140,052 Permit Services Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $50.2731 $61.0962 $8,714 $10,590 $104,568 $127,080 Planning Manager MGMT 11/6/24 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 Police Support Services Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $52.7192 $64.0731 $9,138 $11,106 $109,656 $133,272 Preschool Site Supervisor MGMT 7/1/24 $32.9135 $39.9981 $5,705 $6,933 $68,460 $83,196 Principal Engineer MGMT 7/1/24 $64.0038 $77.7865 $11,094 $13,483 $133,128 $161,796 Program Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $42.4731 $51.6173 $7,362 $8,947 $88,344 $107,364 Public Information Officer MGMT 7/1/24 $52.7192 $64.0731 $9,138 $11,106 $109,656 $133,272 Purchasing Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $52.6558 $63.9923 $9,127 $11,092 $109,524 $133,104 Recreation Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $52.6558 $63.9923 $9,127 $11,092 $109,524 $133,104 Senior Analyst MGMT 7/1/24 $48.3058 $58.7077 $8,373 $10,176 $100,476 $122,112 Senior Engineer MGMT 7/1/24 $57.9577 $70.4365 $10,046 $12,209 $120,552 $146,508 Senior Finance Analyst MGMT 7/1/24 $50.3365 $61.1712 $8,725 $10,603 $104,700 $127,236 Senior Planner MGMT 7/1/24 $50.3365 $61.1712 $8,725 $10,603 $104,700 $127,236 Senior Program Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $52.7192 $64.0731 $9,138 $11,106 $109,656 $133,272 Senior Project Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $50.2731 $61.0962 $8,714 $10,590 $104,568 $127,080 Senior Transportation Planner MGMT 7/1/24 $50.3365 $61.1712 $8,725 $10,603 $104,700 $127,236 Supervising Transportation Planner MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4827 $67.4308 $9,617 $11,688 $115,404 $140,256 Sustainability Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4827 $67.4308 $9,617 $11,688 $115,404 $140,256 Utilities Maintenance Superintendent MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4019 $67.3327 $9,603 $11,671 $115,236 $140,052 Water Treatment Plant Superintendent MGMT 7/1/24 $58.0731 $70.5750 $10,066 $12,233 $120,792 $146,796

Police Officer's Association City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION TITLE BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Code Enforcement Officer I POA 1/13/24 $26.7000 $32.5442 $4,628 $5,641 $55,536 $67,692 $4,628 $4,744 $4,863 $4,985 $5,110 $5,238 $5,369 $5,503 $5,641 Code Enforcement Officer II POA 1/13/24 $29.5212 $35.9654 $5,117 $6,234 $61,404 $74,808 $5,117 $5,245 $5,376 $5,510 $5,648 $5,789 $5,934 $6,082 $6,234 Code Enforcement Officer, Senior POA 1/13/24 $32.6135 $39.7327 $5,653 $6,887 $67,836 $82,644 $5,653 $5,794 $5,939 $6,087 $6,239 $6,395 $6,555 $6,719 $6,887 Community Services Officer I POA 1/13/24 $22.7885 $27.7673 $3,950 $4,813 $47,400 $57,756 $3,950 $4,049 $4,150 $4,254 $4,360 $4,469 $4,581 $4,696 $4,813 Community Services Officer II POA 1/13/24 $25.5346 $31.1077 $4,426 $5,392 $53,112 $64,704 $4,426 $4,537 $4,650 $4,766 $4,885 $5,007 $5,132 $5,260 $5,392 Community Services Officer, Senior POA 1/13/24 $28.5923 $34.8346 $4,956 $6,038 $59,472 $72,456 $4,956 $5,080 $5,207 $5,337 $5,470 $5,607 $5,747 $5,891 $6,038 Crime Analyst I POA 1/13/24 $33.0000 $40.2115 $5,720 $6,970 $68,640 $83,640 $5,720 $5,863 $6,010 $6,160 $6,314 $6,472 $6,634 $6,800 $6,970 Crime Analyst II POA 1/13/24 $37.5000 $45.6923 $6,500 $7,920 $78,000 $95,040 $6,500 $6,663 $6,830 $7,001 $7,176 $7,355 $7,539 $7,727 $7,920 Crime Analyst, Senior POA 1/13/24 $41.9192 $51.0865 $7,266 $8,855 $87,192 $106,260 $7,266 $7,448 $7,634 $7,825 $8,021 $8,222 $8,428 $8,639 $8,855 Crime Scene Investigator I POA 1/13/24 $27.4212 $33.4096 $4,753 $5,791 $57,036 $69,492 $4,753 $4,872 $4,994 $5,119 $5,247 $5,378 $5,512 $5,650 $5,791 Crime Scene Investigator II POA 1/13/24 $30.4962 $37.1481 $5,286 $6,439 $63,432 $77,268 $5,286 $5,418 $5,553 $5,692 $5,834 $5,980 $6,129 $6,282 $6,439 Crime Scene Investigator III POA 1/13/24 $33.3346 $40.6154 $5,778 $7,040 $69,336 $84,480 $5,778 $5,922 $6,070 $6,222 $6,378 $6,537 $6,700 $6,868 $7,040 Police Officer POA 1/13/24 $44.0365 $53.6596 $7,633 $9,301 $91,596 $111,612 $7,633 $7,824 $8,020 $8,220 $8,426 $8,637 $8,853 $9,074 $9,301 Police Records Technician I POA 1/13/24 $21.8481 $26.6250 $3,787 $4,615 $45,444 $55,380 $3,787 $3,882 $3,979 $4,078 $4,180 $4,285 $4,392 $4,502 $4,615 Police Records Technician II POA 1/13/24 $24.0865 $29.3423 $4,175 $5,086 $50,100 $61,032 $4,175 $4,279 $4,386 $4,496 $4,608 $4,723 $4,841 $4,962 $5,086 Police Records Technician, Senior POA 1/13/24 $26.4865 $32.2788 $4,591 $5,595 $55,092 $67,140 $4,591 $4,706 $4,824 $4,945 $5,069 $5,196 $5,326 $5,459 $5,595 Police Sergeant POA 1/13/24 $54.0058 $65.7981 $9,361 $11,405 $112,332 $136,860 $9,361 $9,595 $9,835 $10,081 $10,333 $10,591 $10,856 $11,127 $11,405 Police Services Coordinator POA 1/13/24 $28.6038 $34.8462 $4,958 $6,040 $59,496 $72,480 $4,958 $5,082 $5,209 $5,339 $5,472 $5,609 $5,749 $5,893 $6,040 Property & Evidence Technician I POA 1/13/24 $24.5654 $29.9192 $4,258 $5,186 $51,096 $62,232 $4,258 $4,364 $4,473 $4,585 $4,700 $4,817 $4,937 $5,060 $5,186 Property & Evidence Technician II POA 1/13/24 $27.0173 $32.9135 $4,683 $5,705 $56,196 $68,460 $4,683 $4,800 $4,920 $5,043 $5,169 $5,298 $5,430 $5,566 $5,705 Youth Counselor POA 1/13/24 $33.8250 $41.2154 $5,863 $7,144 $70,356 $85,728 $5,863 $6,010 $6,160 $6,314 $6,472 $6,634 $6,800 $6,970 $7,144

POSITION TITLE BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Code Enforcement Officer I POA 1/13/24 $26.7692 $32.5442 $4,640 $5,641 $55,680 $67,692 $4,640 $4,872 $5,116 $5,372 $5,641 Code Enforcement Officer II POA 1/13/24 $29.5904 $35.9654 $5,129 $6,234 $61,548 $74,808 $5,129 $5,385 $5,654 $5,937 $6,234 Code Enforcement Officer, Senior POA 1/13/24 $32.6942 $39.7327 $5,667 $6,887 $68,004 $82,644 $5,667 $5,950 $6,247 $6,559 $6,887 Community Services Officer I POA 1/13/24 $22.8462 $27.7673 $3,960 $4,813 $47,520 $57,756 $3,960 $4,158 $4,366 $4,584 $4,813 Community Services Officer II POA 1/13/24 $25.5865 $31.1077 $4,435 $5,392 $53,220 $64,704 $4,435 $4,657 $4,890 $5,135 $5,392 Community Services Officer, Senior POA 1/13/24 $28.6558 $34.8346 $4,967 $6,038 $59,604 $72,456 $4,967 $5,215 $5,476 $5,750 $6,038 Crime Analyst I POA 1/13/24 $33.0808 $40.2115 $5,734 $6,970 $68,808 $83,640 $5,734 $6,021 $6,322 $6,638 $6,970 Crime Analyst II POA 1/13/24 $37.5923 $45.6923 $6,516 $7,920 $78,192 $95,040 $6,516 $6,842 $7,184 $7,543 $7,920 Crime Analyst, Senior POA 1/13/24 $42.0288 $51.0865 $7,285 $8,855 $87,420 $106,260 $7,285 $7,649 $8,031 $8,433 $8,855 Crime Scene Investigator I POA 1/13/24 $27.4846 $33.4096 $4,764 $5,791 $57,168 $69,492 $4,764 $5,002 $5,252 $5,515 $5,791 Crime Scene Investigator II POA 1/13/24 $30.5596 $37.1481 $5,297 $6,439 $63,564 $77,268 $5,297 $5,562 $5,840 $6,132 $6,439 Crime Scene Investigator III POA 1/13/24 $33.4154 $40.6154 $5,792 $7,040 $69,504 $84,480 $5,792 $6,082 $6,386 $6,705 $7,040 Police Officer POA 1/13/24 $44.1404 $53.6596 $7,651 $9,301 $91,812 $111,612 $7,651 $8,034 $8,436 $8,858 $9,301 Police Records Technician I POA 1/13/24 $21.9058 $26.6250 $3,797 $4,615 $45,564 $55,380 $3,797 $3,987 $4,186 $4,395 $4,615 Police Records Technician II POA 1/13/24 $24.1385 $29.3423 $4,184 $5,086 $50,208 $61,032 $4,184 $4,393 $4,613 $4,844 $5,086 Police Records Technician, Senior POA 1/13/24 $26.5558 $32.2788 $4,603 $5,595 $55,236 $67,140 $4,603 $4,833 $5,075 $5,329 $5,595 Police Sergeant POA 1/13/24 $54.1327 $65.7981 $9,383 $11,405 $112,596 $136,860 $9,383 $9,852 $10,345 $10,862 $11,405 Police Services Coordinator POA 1/13/24 $28.6673 $34.8462 $4,969 $6,040 $59,628 $72,480 $4,969 $5,217 $5,478 $5,752 $6,040 Property & Evidence Technician I POA 1/13/24 $24.6173 $29.9192 $4,267 $5,186 $51,204 $62,232 $4,267 $4,480 $4,704 $4,939 $5,186 Property & Evidence Technician II POA 1/13/24 $27.0750 $32.9135 $4,693 $5,705 $56,316 $68,460 $4,693 $4,928 $5,174 $5,433 $5,705 Youth Counselor POA 1/13/24 $33.9058 $41.2154 $5,877 $7,144 $70,524 $85,728 $5,877 $6,171 $6,480 $6,804 $7,144

SALARY SCHEDULE B

SALARY SCHEDULE A

Police Manager's City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION TITLE BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Police Lieutenant POLMGT 1/13/24 $68.6423 $83.6308 $11,898 $14,496 $142,776 $173,952 $11,898 $12,195 $12,500 $12,812 $13,132 $13,460 $13,797 $14,142 $14,496

POSITION TITLE BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Police Lieutenant POLMGT 1/13/24 $68.8154 $83.6308 $11,928 $14,496 $143,136 $173,952

SALARY SCHEDULE A

SALARY SCHEDULE B

Recruit City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE
GROUP
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Fire Recruit RECRUIT 6/1/24 $35.3365 $6,125 $73,500
Police Recruit RECRUIT 1/13/24 $35.2269 $6,106 $73,272

Safety Management City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE
GROUP
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Deputy Fire Chief SAFEMGT 11/6/24 $78.2827 $95.1404 $13,569 $16,491 $162,828 $197,892 Deputy Police Chief SAFEMGT 7/1/24 $78.2827 $95.1404 $13,569 $16,491 $162,828 $197,892

Specialist & Professionals City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE GROUP SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Accountant I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.8231 $42.4385 $6,036 $7,356 $72,432 $88,272 $6,036 $6,187 $6,342 $6,501 $6,664 $6,831 $7,002 $7,177 $7,356 Accountant II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7250 $49.6212 $7,059 $8,601 $84,708 $103,212 $7,059 $7,235 $7,416 $7,601 $7,791 $7,986 $8,186 $8,391 $8,601 Administrative Analyst I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.8462 $42.4673 $6,040 $7,361 $72,480 $88,332 $6,040 $6,191 $6,346 $6,505 $6,668 $6,835 $7,006 $7,181 $7,361 Administrative Analyst II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.3577 $51.6173 $7,342 $8,947 $88,104 $107,364 $7,342 $7,526 $7,714 $7,907 $8,105 $8,308 $8,516 $8,729 $8,947 Assistant Community Investment Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.8462 $42.4673 $6,040 $7,361 $72,480 $88,332 $6,040 $6,191 $6,346 $6,505 $6,668 $6,835 $7,006 $7,181 $7,361 Assistant Engineer SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.3231 $51.5596 $7,336 $8,937 $88,032 $107,244 $7,336 $7,519 $7,707 $7,900 $8,097 $8,299 $8,506 $8,719 $8,937 Assistant Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.8462 $42.4673 $6,040 $7,361 $72,480 $88,332 $6,040 $6,191 $6,346 $6,505 $6,668 $6,835 $7,006 $7,181 $7,361 Assistant Transportation Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.8462 $42.4673 $6,040 $7,361 $72,480 $88,332 $6,040 $6,191 $6,346 $6,505 $6,668 $6,835 $7,006 $7,181 $7,361 Associate Community Investment Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7885 $49.6962 $7,070 $8,614 $84,840 $103,368 $7,070 $7,247 $7,428 $7,614 $7,804 $7,999 $8,199 $8,404 $8,614 Associate Engineer SPECPROF 7/1/24 $50.2038 $61.1712 $8,702 $10,603 $104,424 $127,236 $8,702 $8,920 $9,143 $9,372 $9,606 $9,846 $10,092 $10,344 $10,603 Associate Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7885 $49.6962 $7,070 $8,614 $84,840 $103,368 $7,070 $7,247 $7,428 $7,614 $7,804 $7,999 $8,199 $8,404 $8,614 Associate Transportation Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7885 $49.6962 $7,070 $8,614 $84,840 $103,368 $7,070 $7,247 $7,428 $7,614 $7,804 $7,999 $8,199 $8,404 $8,614 Building Inspector I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.8788 $43.7077 $6,219 $7,576 $74,628 $90,912 $6,219 $6,374 $6,533 $6,696 $6,863 $7,035 $7,211 $7,391 $7,576 Building Inspector II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7250 $49.6212 $7,059 $8,601 $84,708 $103,212 $7,059 $7,235 $7,416 $7,601 $7,791 $7,986 $8,186 $8,391 $8,601 CALEA Coordinator SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.3577 $51.6173 $7,342 $8,947 $88,104 $107,364 $7,342 $7,526 $7,714 $7,907 $8,105 $8,308 $8,516 $8,729 $8,947 Construction Administrative Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9058 $37.6558 $5,357 $6,527 $64,284 $78,324 $5,357 $5,491 $5,628 $5,769 $5,913 $6,061 $6,213 $6,368 $6,527 Construction Inspector I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.8788 $43.7077 $6,219 $7,576 $74,628 $90,912 $6,219 $6,374 $6,533 $6,696 $6,863 $7,035 $7,211 $7,391 $7,576 Construction Inspector II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7250 $49.6212 $7,059 $8,601 $84,708 $103,212 $7,059 $7,235 $7,416 $7,601 $7,791 $7,986 $8,186 $8,391 $8,601 Construction Inspector III SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.0750 $54.9173 $7,813 $9,519 $93,756 $114,228 $7,813 $8,008 $8,208 $8,413 $8,623 $8,839 $9,060 $9,287 $9,519 Court Liaison Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $26.2269 $31.9558 $4,546 $5,539 $54,552 $66,468 $4,546 $4,660 $4,777 $4,896 $5,018 $5,143 $5,272 $5,404 $5,539 Deputy City Clerk SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9058 $37.6558 $5,357 $6,527 $64,284 $78,324 $5,357 $5,491 $5,628 $5,769 $5,913 $6,061 $6,213 $6,368 $6,527 Engineering Assistant I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.8788 $43.7077 $6,219 $7,576 $74,628 $90,912 $6,219 $6,374 $6,533 $6,696 $6,863 $7,035 $7,211 $7,391 $7,576 Engineering Assistant II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7250 $49.6212 $7,059 $8,601 $84,708 $103,212 $7,059 $7,235 $7,416 $7,601 $7,791 $7,986 $8,186 $8,391 $8,601 Engineering Assistant III SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.0750 $54.9173 $7,813 $9,519 $93,756 $114,228 $7,813 $8,008 $8,208 $8,413 $8,623 $8,839 $9,060 $9,287 $9,519 Finance Analyst SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.0923 $54.9346 $7,816 $9,522 $93,792 $114,264 $7,816 $8,011 $8,211 $8,416 $8,626 $8,842 $9,063 $9,290 $9,522 Financial Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9058 $37.6558 $5,357 $6,527 $64,284 $78,324 $5,357 $5,491 $5,628 $5,769 $5,913 $6,061 $6,213 $6,368 $6,527 Fire Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.8788 $43.7077 $6,219 $7,576 $74,628 $90,912 $6,219 $6,374 $6,533 $6,696 $6,863 $7,035 $7,211 $7,391 $7,576 Information Technology Specialist I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $37.7077 $45.9346 $6,536 $7,962 $78,432 $95,544 $6,536 $6,699 $6,866 $7,038 $7,214 $7,394 $7,579 $7,768 $7,962 Information Technology Specialist II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.3577 $51.6173 $7,342 $8,947 $88,104 $107,364 $7,342 $7,526 $7,714 $7,907 $8,105 $8,308 $8,516 $8,729 $8,947 Landscape Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.8788 $43.7077 $6,219 $7,576 $74,628 $90,912 $6,219 $6,374 $6,533 $6,696 $6,863 $7,035 $7,211 $7,391 $7,576 Plans Examiner I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.8788 $43.7077 $6,219 $7,576 $74,628 $90,912 $6,219 $6,374 $6,533 $6,696 $6,863 $7,035 $7,211 $7,391 $7,576 Plans Examiner II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7250 $49.6212 $7,059 $8,601 $84,708 $103,212 $7,059 $7,235 $7,416 $7,601 $7,791 $7,986 $8,186 $8,391 $8,601 Police Records Supervisor SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9019 $43.7423 $6,223 $7,582 $74,676 $90,984 $6,223 $6,379 $6,538 $6,701 $6,869 $7,041 $7,217 $7,397 $7,582 Preschool Teacher SPECPROF 7/1/24 $19.9038 $24.2538 $3,450 $4,204 $41,400 $50,448 $3,450 $3,536 $3,624 $3,715 $3,808 $3,903 $4,001 $4,101 $4,204 Preschool Teacher/Family Support Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $20.1404 $24.5365 $3,491 $4,253 $41,892 $51,036 $3,491 $3,578 $3,667 $3,759 $3,853 $3,949 $4,048 $4,149 $4,253 Program Technician I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $26.7577 $32.6019 $4,638 $5,651 $55,656 $67,812 $4,638 $4,754 $4,873 $4,995 $5,120 $5,248 $5,379 $5,513 $5,651 Program Technician II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9058 $37.6558 $5,357 $6,527 $64,284 $78,324 $5,357 $5,491 $5,628 $5,769 $5,913 $6,061 $6,213 $6,368 $6,527 Project Manager I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7885 $49.6962 $7,070 $8,614 $84,840 $103,368 $7,070 $7,247 $7,428 $7,614 $7,804 $7,999 $8,199 $8,404 $8,614 Project Manager II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.0981 $54.9404 $7,817 $9,523 $93,804 $114,276 $7,817 $8,012 $8,212 $8,417 $8,627 $8,843 $9,064 $9,291 $9,523 Senior Accountant SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.0750 $54.9173 $7,813 $9,519 $93,756 $114,228 $7,813 $8,008 $8,208 $8,413 $8,623 $8,839 $9,060 $9,287 $9,519 Senior Building Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.0750 $54.9173 $7,813 $9,519 $93,756 $114,228 $7,813 $8,008 $8,208 $8,413 $8,623 $8,839 $9,060 $9,287 $9,519 Senior Deputy City Clerk SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.8231 $42.4385 $6,036 $7,356 $72,432 $88,272 $6,036 $6,187 $6,342 $6,501 $6,664 $6,831 $7,002 $7,177 $7,356 Senior Fire Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7712 $49.6788 $7,067 $8,611 $84,804 $103,332 $7,067 $7,244 $7,425 $7,611 $7,801 $7,996 $8,196 $8,401 $8,611 Senior Landscape Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7712 $49.6788 $7,067 $8,611 $84,804 $103,332 $7,067 $7,244 $7,425 $7,611 $7,801 $7,996 $8,196 $8,401 $8,611 Senior Plans Examiner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.0750 $54.9173 $7,813 $9,519 $93,756 $114,228 $7,813 $8,008 $8,208 $8,413 $8,623 $8,839 $9,060 $9,287 $9,519 Technical Support Specialist I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $26.7519 $32.5962 $4,637 $5,650 $55,644 $67,800 $4,637 $4,753 $4,872 $4,994 $5,119 $5,247 $5,378 $5,512 $5,650 Technical Support Specialist II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9058 $37.6558 $5,357 $6,527 $64,284 $78,324 $5,357 $5,491 $5,628 $5,769 $5,913 $6,061 $6,213 $6,368 $6,527 Technical Support Specialist III SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9019 $43.7423 $6,223 $7,582 $74,676 $90,984 $6,223 $6,379 $6,538 $6,701 $6,869 $7,041 $7,217 $7,397 $7,582

SALARY SCHEDULE B

Specialist & Professionals City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE GROUP SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Accountant I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.9096 $42.4385 $6,051 $7,356 $72,612 $88,272 $6,051 $6,354 $6,672 $7,006 $7,356 Accountant II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8231 $49.6212 $7,076 $8,601 $84,912 $103,212 $7,076 $7,430 $7,801 $8,191 $8,601 Administrative Analyst I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.9327 $42.4673 $6,055 $7,361 $72,660 $88,332 $6,055 $6,358 $6,676 $7,010 $7,361 Administrative Analyst II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.4673 $51.6173 $7,361 $8,947 $88,332 $107,364 $7,361 $7,729 $8,115 $8,521 $8,947 Assistant Community Investment Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.9327 $42.4673 $6,055 $7,361 $72,660 $88,332 $6,055 $6,358 $6,676 $7,010 $7,361 Assistant Engineer SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.4154 $51.5596 $7,352 $8,937 $88,224 $107,244 $7,352 $7,720 $8,106 $8,511 $8,937 Assistant Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.9327 $42.4673 $6,055 $7,361 $72,660 $88,332 $6,055 $6,358 $6,676 $7,010 $7,361 Assistant Transportation Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.9327 $42.4673 $6,055 $7,361 $72,660 $88,332 $6,055 $6,358 $6,676 $7,010 $7,361 Associate Community Investment Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8865 $49.6962 $7,087 $8,614 $85,044 $103,368 $7,087 $7,441 $7,813 $8,204 $8,614 Associate Engineer SPECPROF 7/1/24 $50.3250 $61.1712 $8,723 $10,603 $104,676 $127,236 $8,723 $9,159 $9,617 $10,098 $10,603 Associate Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8865 $49.6962 $7,087 $8,614 $85,044 $103,368 $7,087 $7,441 $7,813 $8,204 $8,614 Associate Transportation Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8865 $49.6962 $7,087 $8,614 $85,044 $103,368 $7,087 $7,441 $7,813 $8,204 $8,614 Building Inspector I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9538 $43.7077 $6,232 $7,576 $74,784 $90,912 $6,232 $6,544 $6,871 $7,215 $7,576 Building Inspector II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8231 $49.6212 $7,076 $8,601 $84,912 $103,212 $7,076 $7,430 $7,801 $8,191 $8,601 CALEA Coordinator SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.4673 $51.6173 $7,361 $8,947 $88,332 $107,364 $7,361 $7,729 $8,115 $8,521 $8,947 Construction Administrative Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9808 $37.6558 $5,370 $6,527 $64,440 $78,324 $5,370 $5,638 $5,920 $6,216 $6,527 Construction Inspector I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9538 $43.7077 $6,232 $7,576 $74,784 $90,912 $6,232 $6,544 $6,871 $7,215 $7,576 Construction Inspector II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8231 $49.6212 $7,076 $8,601 $84,912 $103,212 $7,076 $7,430 $7,801 $8,191 $8,601 Construction Inspector III SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.1788 $54.9173 $7,831 $9,519 $93,972 $114,228 $7,831 $8,223 $8,634 $9,066 $9,519 Court Liaison Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $26.2904 $31.9558 $4,557 $5,539 $54,684 $66,468 $4,557 $4,785 $5,024 $5,275 $5,539 Deputy City Clerk SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9808 $37.6558 $5,370 $6,527 $64,440 $78,324 $5,370 $5,638 $5,920 $6,216 $6,527 Engineering Assistant I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9538 $43.7077 $6,232 $7,576 $74,784 $90,912 $6,232 $6,544 $6,871 $7,215 $7,576 Engineering Assistant II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8231 $49.6212 $7,076 $8,601 $84,912 $103,212 $7,076 $7,430 $7,801 $8,191 $8,601 Engineering Assistant III SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.1788 $54.9173 $7,831 $9,519 $93,972 $114,228 $7,831 $8,223 $8,634 $9,066 $9,519 Finance Analyst SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.1962 $54.9346 $7,834 $9,522 $94,008 $114,264 $7,834 $8,226 $8,637 $9,069 $9,522 Financial Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9808 $37.6558 $5,370 $6,527 $64,440 $78,324 $5,370 $5,638 $5,920 $6,216 $6,527 Fire Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9538 $43.7077 $6,232 $7,576 $74,784 $90,912 $6,232 $6,544 $6,871 $7,215 $7,576 Information Technology Specialist I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $37.7885 $45.9346 $6,550 $7,962 $78,600 $95,544 $6,550 $6,878 $7,222 $7,583 $7,962 Information Technology Specialist II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.4673 $51.6173 $7,361 $8,947 $88,332 $107,364 $7,361 $7,729 $8,115 $8,521 $8,947 Landscape Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9538 $43.7077 $6,232 $7,576 $74,784 $90,912 $6,232 $6,544 $6,871 $7,215 $7,576 Plans Examiner I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9538 $43.7077 $6,232 $7,576 $74,784 $90,912 $6,232 $6,544 $6,871 $7,215 $7,576 Plans Examiner II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8231 $49.6212 $7,076 $8,601 $84,912 $103,212 $7,076 $7,430 $7,801 $8,191 $8,601 Police Records Supervisor SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9885 $43.7423 $6,238 $7,582 $74,856 $90,984 $6,238 $6,550 $6,877 $7,221 $7,582 Preschool Teacher SPECPROF 7/1/24 $19.9500 $24.2538 $3,458 $4,204 $41,496 $50,448 $3,458 $3,631 $3,813 $4,004 $4,204 Preschool Teacher/Family Support Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $20.1808 $24.5365 $3,498 $4,253 $41,976 $51,036 $3,498 $3,673 $3,857 $4,050 $4,253 Program Technician I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $26.8269 $32.6019 $4,650 $5,651 $55,800 $67,812 $4,650 $4,882 $5,126 $5,382 $5,651 Program Technician II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9808 $37.6558 $5,370 $6,527 $64,440 $78,324 $5,370 $5,638 $5,920 $6,216 $6,527 Project Manager I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8865 $49.6962 $7,087 $8,614 $85,044 $103,368 $7,087 $7,441 $7,813 $8,204 $8,614 Project Manager II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.2019 $54.9404 $7,835 $9,523 $94,020 $114,276 $7,835 $8,227 $8,638 $9,070 $9,523 Senior Accountant SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.1788 $54.9173 $7,831 $9,519 $93,972 $114,228 $7,831 $8,223 $8,634 $9,066 $9,519 Senior Building Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.1788 $54.9173 $7,831 $9,519 $93,972 $114,228 $7,831 $8,223 $8,634 $9,066 $9,519 Senior Deputy City Clerk SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.9096 $42.4385 $6,051 $7,356 $72,612 $88,272 $6,051 $6,354 $6,672 $7,006 $7,356 Senior Fire Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8692 $49.6788 $7,084 $8,611 $85,008 $103,332 $7,084 $7,438 $7,810 $8,201 $8,611 Senior Landscape Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8692 $49.6788 $7,084 $8,611 $85,008 $103,332 $7,084 $7,438 $7,810 $8,201 $8,611 Senior Plans Examiner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.1788 $54.9173 $7,831 $9,519 $93,972 $114,228 $7,831 $8,223 $8,634 $9,066 $9,519 Technical Support Specialist I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $26.8212 $32.5962 $4,649 $5,650 $55,788 $67,800 $4,649 $4,881 $5,125 $5,381 $5,650 Technical Support Specialist II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9808 $37.6558 $5,370 $6,527 $64,440 $78,324 $5,370 $5,638 $5,920 $6,216 $6,527 Technical Support Specialist III SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9885 $43.7423 $6,238 $7,582 $74,856 $90,984 $6,238 $6,550 $6,877 $7,221 $7,582

SALARY SCHEDULE A

Extra Help City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 11/6/2024
POSITION TITLE SALARY EFFECTIVE Minimum Hourly Maximum Hourly Assistant Pool Manager 1/1/2024 $17.50 $18.25
Designated Level I Reserve Police Officer 1/1/2024 $25.50 $30.50 Emergency Services Coordinator 1/1/2024 $55.00 $55.00
Laborer 1/1/2024 $16.00 $19.00
Lead Program Leader 3/9/2024 $23.00 $25.50
Lead Recreation Leader 1/1/2024 $18.25 $19.25
Lifeguard/Swim Instructor 1/1/2024 $16.00 $17.50
Parking/Traffic Enforcement Officer 1/1/2024 $18.50 $21.25 Planning Commissioner 1/1/2024 $30 per meeting
Pool Manager 1/1/2024 $18.25 $19.25
Program Aide 3/9/2024 $16.00 $18.50
Program Assistant 1/1/2024 $16.00 $21.00
Program Leader 3/9/2024 $18.50 $21.00
Program Site Leader 3/9/2024 $21.00 $23.50
Recreation Aide 1/1/2024 $16.00 $16.25
Recreation Assistant 1/1/2024 $19.25 $21.00
Recreation Leader 1/1/2024 $16.25 $17.50
Retired Annuitant 1/1/2024 $16.00 $77.00
Senior Parking/Traffic Enforcement Officer 1/1/2024 $21.75 $24.50 Senior Recreation Leader 1/1/2024 $17.50 $18.25
Student Intern 1/1/2024 $16.00 $21.00
Substitute Preschool Teacher 1/1/2024 $16.00 $18.25
Salary increases at $0.25 increments with a maximum of $1.00.

210
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Cover Page
Approved: 11/6/2024
Effective: 11/6/2024
City of West Sacramento
Authorized Position List
Fiscal Year 2024 / 2025
Total Authorized Positions:
439.55
211
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Capital Projects
Approved: 11/6/2024
Effective: 11/6/2024

POSITION
101-9653Engineering101-9654Inspection Engineering
101-9651Engineering Administration101-9652Facilities Development104-9657 Real Property Management Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 1 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT MANAGER 0.25 0.5 0.25 1
CONSTRUCTION & FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT MANAGER 0.5 0.5 1 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SPECIALIST 0.5 0.5 1
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION MANAGER 1 1
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR I/II/III 5 5
DIRECTOR OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 1 1
ENGINEER SERIES (ASSISTANT/ASSOCIATE/SENIOR) 7 7
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I/II/III 2 2
ENGINEERING/GIS TECHNICIAN 1 1
FINANCIAL SPECIALIST 1 1
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST I/II 1 1
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 1 1
PROGRAM MANAGER/SENIOR 1 1
PROJECT MANAGER I/II/SENIOR 5 5
Grand Total 9.25 7 6.5 6.25 1 30.00
212
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
City Manager's Office
Approved: 11/6/2024
Effective: 11/6/2024

POSITION
104-9016City Manager's Office104-9022City Clerk104-9024Human Resources104-9026Community Relations104-9034Information Technology106-9020Economic Development 110-9017Kids Home Run Initiative110-9018Smart City Initiatives516-9700Port Administration652-9040Flood Protection 104-9021Government
Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 1 1 2
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK I/II/III 1 1
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 0.82 0.08 0.1 1
CITY CLERK 1 1
CITY MANAGER 0.55 0.2 0.25 1
DATA SERVICES MANAGER 0.5 0.5 1
DEPUTY CITY CLERK I/II/SENIOR 1.925 0.075 2
DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/DIRECTOR OF INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY 0.34 0.33 0.33 1 ENGINEER SERIES (ASSISTANT/ASSOCIATE/SENIOR) 1 1
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER 0.75 0.05 0.2 1 FLOOD GENERAL MANAGER* 1 1
FLOOD PROTECTION MANAGER 1 1
FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNER 1 1
HOME RUN MANAGER 1 1
HUMAN RESOURCES & PAYROLL TECHNICIAN I/II 4 4
HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER 1 1
HUMAN RESOURCES SUPERVISOR 1 1
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS SERVICES MANAGER 1 1
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS MANAGER 1 1
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST I/II 5 5
PAYROLL ADMINISTRATOR 1 1
PORT GENERAL MANAGER 1 1
PROGRAM MANAGER/SENIOR 1 1 1 3
PROGRAM TECHNICIAN I/II 1 2 3
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER 1 1
SECRETARY 1 1
TECHNICAL SUPPORT SPECIALIST I/II/III 3 3
Grand Total 3.12 3.925 7 2.34 10.33 0.33 4.5 0.83 2.625 6 1 42.00 *Flood General Manager eliminated effective 1/1/2025.

Note: Flood Division moving to Capital Projects effective 1/1/2025. 213
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Community Development
Approved: 11/6/2024
Effective: 11/6/2024

POSITION
101-9130Code Enforcement108-9130Code Enforcement650-9310Comm Development Admin.650-9315Building Inspection650-9321Dev/Traffic Engineering 650-9311Planning106-9311Planning653-9661Sustainability 101-9655Transportation and Mobility106-9655Transportation and Mobility Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 1 3 4
ASSISTANT/ASSOCIATE PLANNER 1 1
BUILDING INSPECTOR I/II/SENIOR 2.5 2.5
CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL 1 1
CLERK/SENIOR CLERK 1 1
CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER 1 1
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I/II/SENIOR 3 1 4
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 1
ENGINEER SERIES (ASSISTANT/ASSOCIATE/SENIOR)* 3 1 4
ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/II/III** 1 1
PERMIT SERVICES MANAGER 1 1
PERMIT TECHNICIAN I/II 2.5 0.5 3
PLANNING MANAGER 1 1
PLANNING TECHNICIAN 1 1
PLANS EXAMINER I/II/SENIOR 1.5 1.5
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 1 1
PROGRAM TECHNICIAN I/II 1 1
SECRETARY 1 1 2
SENIOR PLANNER 2 1 3
SUPERVISING TRANSPORTATION PLANNER 1 1
SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER 1 1
TRANSPORTATION PLANNER SERIES (ASSISTANT/ASSOCIATE/SENIOR) 2 2 Grand Total 5 1 4 8.5 5.5 5 1 5 3 1 39.00
Note*: 1.0 FTE Engineer Series in 650-9321 may be filled at lower level Engineer Assistant I/II/III or Engineering Technician I/II/III.

Note*: 1.0 FTE Engineer Assistant I/II/III may be filled at lower level Engineering Technician I/II/III. 214
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Economic Development & Housing
Approved: 11/6/2024
Effective: 11/6/2024

POSITION
106-9020Economic Development219-9328Parking Activities
218-9019Homeless Program
Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 1 1
COMMUNITY INVESTMENT MANAGER 1 1
COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PLANNER SERIES (ASSISTANT/ASSOCIATE) 2 2 COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PRINCIPAL PLANNER 1 1
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING 1 1
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER 1 1
HOUSING MANAGER 1 1
PARKING MANAGER 1 1
PROGRAM MANAGER/SENIOR 2 1 3
PROGRAM TECHNICIAN I/II 1 1
SECRETARY 1 1
Grand Total 10 2 2 14.00
215
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Finance
Approved: 11/6/2024
Effective: 11/6/2024

POSITION
104-9050Finance Administration104-9051Finance Fiscal Records104-9052Finance Revenue Collections 104-9053 Procurement & Contracting104-9054Budget & Financial Grand Total
ACCOUNTANT I/II/SENIOR 2 2
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN I/II/III 2 5 7
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 1
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 1 1
FINANCE ANALYST/SENIOR 1 1
FINANCE MANAGER 1 0.2 0.8 2
FINANCE SUPERVISOR 1 1 2
PURCHASING MANAGER 1 1
Grand Total 2 6 6.2 3 1.8 19.00
216
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Fire
Approved: 11/6/2024
Effective: 11/6/2024

POSITION
101-9153Fire - Hazardous Materials108-9151Fire Operations 101-9150Fire - Administration101-9151Fire - Operations101-9152Fire Prevention Services256-9158SAFER - Grant Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 1 1 2
DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF 1 1
FINANCIAL SPECIALIST 1 1
FIRE BATTALION CHIEF 4 4
FIRE CAPTAIN 19 19
FIRE CHIEF 1 1
FIRE ENGINEER 18 18
FIRE FIGHTER 2 14 9 25
FIRE INSPECTOR/SENIOR 2 2
FIRE MARSHAL 0.9 0.1 1
PLANS EXAMINER I/II/SENIOR 1 1
Grand Total 3.9 2 4.1 55 1 9 75.00
217
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Parks & Recreation
Approved: 11/6/2024
Effective: 11/6/2024

POSITION
101-9500Parks & Recreation Admin101-9510Recreation Activities254-9555Discovery Preschool Program 110-9019Homeless ProgramVarious Community Facilities Districts (CFD)213-9175Landscape & Lighting 108-9515Recreation Center101-9520Parks & Trail Maintenance110-9520Parks & Trail Maintenance Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 2 2
BUSINESS MANAGER 1 1
CHIEF PARKS & GROUNDS WORKER 0.8 3.2 4
DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION 1 1
GROUNDSKEEPER 1 4 1 6
LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR/SENIOR 0.8 0.2 1
PARKS & GROUNDS WORKER/SENIOR 1 7 8
PARKS OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT 1 1
PRESCHOOL SITE SUPERVISOR 0.8 0.8
PRESCHOOL TEACHER 0.75 0.75
PROJECT MANAGER I/II/SENIOR 0.8 0.2 1
RECREATION COORDINATOR 6.56 0.44 7
RECREATION MANAGER 2 2
RECREATION SUPERVISOR I/II 6 6
SECRETARY 1 1
SPECIAL EVENTS SUPERVISOR I/II 1 1
Grand Total 6 14.56 1.55 2 2.4 0.4 0.44 15.2 1 43.55

0.8 FTE Chief Parks & Grounds Worker: Various Community Facilities Districts: 269-9176/5.01%, 269-9177/8.64%, 269-9178/16.51%, 269- 9179/12.64%, 269-9180/3.07%, 269-9181/1.45%, 269-9182/0.41%, 269-9183/7.21%, 269-9184/4.89%, 269-9185/4.63%, 269-9186/3.07%, 269-9188/1.66%, 269-9189/5.48%, 269-9193/2.43%, 269-9194/2.90%

0.8 FTE Project Manager I/II/Senior & Landscape Inspector/Senior: Various Community Facilities Districts: 269-9176/3.46%, 269-9177/9.01%, 269-9178/16.51%, 269-9179/8.01%, 269-9180/3.87%, 269-9181/1.33%, 269-9182/0.64%, 269-9183/13.69%, 269-9184/1.48%, 269- 9185/3.24%, 269-9186/4.04%, 269-9188/3.64%, 269-9189/3.82%, 269-9192/0.71%, 269-9193/2.38%, 269-9194/3.62%, 269-9195/0.55%, 218
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Police
Approved: 11/6/2024
Effective: 11/6/2024

POSITION
101-9110Police - Administration101-9111Police - Investigations101-9113Police - Patrol101-9116Police - Traffic/ParkingSafety108-9111Police - Investigations 101-9112Police - Records101-9114Police - COS110-9019Homeless Program111-9110Police - Administration111-9113Police - Patrol101-9117Police - C.L.O. Program Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 4 2 6
BUSINESS MANAGER 1 1
CALEA COORDINATOR 1 1
CLERK/SENIOR CLERK 1 1
COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER I/II/SENIOR 4 2 6
COURT LIAISON OFFICER 0.5 0.5
COURT LIAISON SPECIALIST 0.5 0.5
CRIME ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 1 1
CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATOR I/II/III 2 2
DEPUTY POLICE CHIEF 1 1
FINANCIAL SPECIALIST 1 1
POLICE CHIEF 1 1
POLICE LIEUTENANT 2 1 2 5
POLICE OFFICER 10 43 3 1 57
POLICE RECORDS SUPERVISOR 1 1
POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN I/II/SENIOR 6 6
POLICE SERGEANT 1 1 8 1 2 13
POLICE SERVICES COORDINATOR 1 1
POLICE SUPPORT SERVICES MANAGER 1 1
PROGRAM MANAGER/SENIOR 1 1
PROGRAM TECHNICIAN I/II 1 1
PROPERTY/EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN I/II 2 2
SECRETARY 1 1 1 3
YOUTH COUNSELOR 1 1
Grand Total 14 17 57 4 3 9 4 2 1 2 1 114.00
NOTE: 5.0 FTE Police Officer positions in General Fund 101 designated as unfunded 219
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Public Works O & M
Approved: 11/6/2024
Effective: 11/6/2024

POSITION
104-9325City Facility Project & Maint108-9205Street Sweeping Maintenance108-9210Road Maintenance201-9205Street Sweeping Maintenance201-9210Road Maintenance215-9230Storm Water Maint-MS4501-9410Sewer Collection506-9610Water Treatment506-9611Water Distribution506-9612Water Backflow Prevention Prg 610-9650Public Works O&M Administration104-9326Fleet Maintenance101-9212Traffic/Transportation Operations218-9019Homeless Program108-9515Recreation Center Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 2 2
CHIEF FACILITIES MAINTENANCE WORKER 1 1
CHIEF MAINTENANCE WORKER 1 1 1 3
CHIEF TREATMENT PLANT MECHANIC 0.5 0.5 1
CLERK/SENIOR CLERK 1 1
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE 1 1
ELECTRICAL TECHNICIAN 1 1 2
ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/II/III* 1 1
EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES SUPERINTENDENT 0.5 0.5 1
EQUIPMENT MECHANIC I/II 3 3
FACILITIES MAINTENTANCE WORKER/AIDE/SENIOR 3 1 4
INSTRUMENTATION TECHNICIAN 1 1
MAINTENANCE WORKER/SENIOR 1 1 1 4 2 7 7 2 25
SECRETARY 1 1
SENIOR WATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR 1 1
STATIONARY ENGINEER 2 1 3
TRAFFIC CONTROL & LIGHTING TECHNICIAN I/II* 1 1
TREATMENT PLANT MECHANIC I/II 2 1 3
UTILITIES MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1 WATER METER TECHNICIAN 1 1
WATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR APPRENTICE/II/III 5 5
WATER TREATMENT SUPERINTENDENT 1 1
Grand Total 6.5 1 2 1 4.25 2.25 11.75 10.5 9.25 2 5 3.5 2 1 1 63.00 Unfund 1.0 FTE Engineering Assistant I/II/II and Traffic Control & Lighting Technician I/II from 101-9112. 220
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Summary Amendments
Approved: 11/6/2024
Effective: 11/6/2024
Date Dept Approved By Amendment
7/1/2024 City Manager's Office City Council
Reclassify 1.0 Human Resources Analyst/Senior to 1.0 Human Resources Supervisor in 104-9024. Reclassify 1.0 FTE Business Manager to 1.0 FTE Home Run Manager in 110-9017. Change 0.5 FTE Program Manager/Senior from 104-9016 to 516-9700. Change 0.5 FTE Administrative Analyst I/II/Senior from 110-9016 to 104-9016. Add 1.0 FTE Flood Protection Manager to 652-9040. 7/1/2024 Economic Development & Housing City Council Add 1.0 FTE Community Investment Principal Planner to 106-9020 7/1/2024 Parks & Recreation City Council Add 1.0 Groundskeeper to 101-9520 approved 8/16/2023. Add 1.0 FTE Administrative Analyst I/II/Senior to 101-9500 7/1/2024 Police City Council Add 1.0 Financial Specialist to 101-9110 7/1/2024 Community Development City Council Retitle Traffic/Transportation Division to Transportation & Mobility. Retitle Environmental Services Division to Sustainability. Retitle Environmental Services & Sustainability Manager to Sustainability Manager. 9/19/2024 Community Development Correction Correct 1.0 FTE Engineer Series (Junior/Assistant/Associate/Senior) incrrectly listed in 101-9655 to 106-9655 effective 7/1/2023. 11/6/2024 Community Development City Council Eliminate 1.0 FTE Principal Planner from 650-9311 and add 1.0 FTE Planning Manager 650-9311. 11/6/2024 Fire City Council Add 3.0 FTE Firefighters to 256-9158. Move 6.0 FTE firefighters from 101-9151 to 256-9158. Add 3.0 FTE Fire Engineers to 101-9151. Add 3.0 FTE Fire Captains to 101-9151.
1/1/2025 Capital Projects City Council Eliminate 1.0 FTE Flood General Manager from 652-9040. Flood Division moving from City Manager's Office. 1/1/2025 City Manager's Office City Council Flood Division moving to Capital Projects. 221
Attachment 4
RESOLUTION 24-113

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO ADOPTING BUDGET AMENDMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
WHEREAS, the Fire Department was awarded the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) grant to fund nine (9) new firefighter positions beginning in January 2025; and
WHEREAS, the upgrade of six existing Firefighter positions to three Fire Engineers and three Fire Captains is required to adequately staff reinstated Engine #45 for a 24/7 emergency response operation; and
WHEREAS, City staff propose the elimination of the Principal Planner position to be replaced with a new classification of Planning Manager to align the job title and salary range with industry standards and accurately reflect the role’s responsibilities and increased qualifications for this division manager position; and
WHEREAS, staff proposes to align the Fire Deputy Chief salary range with the Police Deputy Chief salary range; and
WHEREAS, additional costs are anticipated to recruit, hire, and train the new firefighter positions in the fire academy, requiring additional one-time appropriations; and

WHEREAS, the expected cost for the new Firefighter positions for FY 2024/25, to be fully covered by the SAFER grant award, are estimated at $510,750; and WHEREAS, a new fire engine is needed to reinstate Engine #45 and the annual lease financing cost is estimated at $130,000; and
WHEREAS, the total one-time cost proposed to be funded by the General Fund for FY 2024/25 is $365,815, and ongoing appropriations of $233,208 are requested to cover the costs to reinstate Engine #45 in June 2025 and align the Fire Deputy Chief salary with the Police Deputy Chief salary; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all information related to this matter, as presented at the public meetings of the City Council identified herein, including any supporting reports by City staff, and any other information provided during public meetings.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento as follows:

1. The City Council hereby approves the adjustments to the FY 2024/25 budget as provided below:

SOURCES
$130,000 313-9099-4990 Transfer in – Fire apparatus lease $510,750 256-9158-4640 SAFER grant revenues FY 2024/25
$578,273 101-0000-3110 General Fund Balance
$1,089,023 TOTAL SOURCES
USES
$510,750 256-9158-5111 SAFER grant 9 fire recruits Jan-June 2025 $130,000 101-9151-5950 Transfer out – Fire apparatus lease $130,000 313-9099-5412 Fire apparatus lease payment
$82,458 101-9151-5111 Upgrade FF to Engineer, Captain June 2025 $210,000 101-9151-5113 Drill Instructor backfill for Fire Academy 222
Resolution 24-113 FY 2024/25 APL Budget Adjustments

$155,815 101-9151-5259 PPE for fire recruits
$1,089,023 TOTAL USES
*Note: interfund transfers not included in total to avoid duplication of total costs

2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption, unless otherwise noted within the Exhibits to this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento this 6th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
223

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 6, 2024 ITEM # 15
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 27, 2023, OCTOBER 18, 2023, NOVEMBER 1, 2023, NOVEMBER 15, 2023 AND SEPTEMBER 18, 2024 REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL,

REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AND WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING

AUTHORITY
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
City Manager’s Office
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with the draft minutes of the September 27, 2023, October 18, 2023, November 1, 2023, November 15, 2023 and September 18, 2024 Regular Meetings of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve the minutes of the September 27, 2023, October 18, 2023, November 1, 2023, November 15, 2023 and September 18, 2024 Regular Meetings of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority.

BACKGROUND
When uploading the 2023 City Council meeting minutes into the City’s electronic records management system staff noticed that there were four meetings sets of meeting minutes from 2023 that had inadvertently not been approved by Council. As such, the draft minutes from the September 27, 2023, October 18, 2023, November 1, 2023, and November 15, 2023 meetings are included for City Council approval along with the minutes of the September 18, 2024 Regular Meeting.

ANALYSIS
N/A
Environmental Considerations
N/A
Commission Recommendations
N/A
Strategic Plan Integration
N/A
Coordination and Review
N/A
Budget Cost Impact
N/A

ATTACHMENTS

1. Draft Minutes of the September 27, 2023 Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority

2. Draft Minutes of the October 18, 2023 Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority

3. Draft Minutes of the November 1, 2023 Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority

4. Draft Minutes of the November 15, 2023 Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority

5. Draft Minutes of the September 18, 2024 Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority 224

WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL AND

WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND

WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
City Council Special Meeting
SEPTEMBER 27, 2023 MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m.

Present
Mayor Martha Guerrero; Mayor Pro Tem Quirina Orozco; Council Member Norma Alcala; Board Member Dawnte Early; Council Member Verna Sulpizio Hull GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART I

1. PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WITHIN THE

JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL
The Council is prohibited from discussing issues not on the agenda brought to them at this time.

According to State Law (the Brown Act), items must first be noticed on the agenda before any discussion or action.

The City Council received public comment on items not on the agenda within the City’s jurisdiction.

PRESENTATIONS

2. City Manager's Office

PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO HONORING

THE LIFE AND LEGACY OF YOLO COUNTY SUPERVISOR GARY SANDY The West Sacramento City Council presented a proclamation honoring the life and legacy of Yolo County Supervisor Gary Sandy.

3. City Manager's Office

PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH
The City Council presented a proclamation declaring September 15 to October 15, 2023 as Hispanic Heritage Month.

CONSENT AGENDA
Approved the Consent Agenda, with the exception of Items 9 and 11 on which votes were taken separately.

MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Early, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None);

4. Capital Projects
225
2 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT 2 TO THE CONTRACT FOR SERVICES

WITH DISABILITY ACCESS CONSULTANTS
Approved Amendment 2 to the Contract for Services with Disability Access Consultants for the amount of $79,500 and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendments or change orders up to 15% ($19,350) of the contract value.

5. Capital Projects

CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF A CONTRACT TO HITOUCH SERVICES FOR THE FURNITURE AND WORKSTATIONS FOR THE FIRE STATION 45 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (CIP 51278)
Awarded a Contract utilizing the Sourcewell Cooperative agreement to Hitouch Services for the furniture and workstations for the Fire Station 45 Improvements Project; delegated authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with HiTouch Services in an amount not to exceed $130,605.87; and delegated authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments, miscellaneous construction cost, or contract change orders up to 15% ($19,590) of the total contract amount.

6. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 23-9 AMENDING TITLE 10 (VEHICLES

AND TRAFFIC) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF

SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (CIP 12019)
Waived the first reading and read by title and number only, Ordinance 23-9, amending Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento and informed the public that the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 23-9 is scheduled for November 1, 2023.

7. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-66 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO

THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) FOR THE APPROPRIATION OF CDBG GRANT

FUNDS TO THE CIP BUDGET FOR THE WASHINGTON AND BRODERICK LIGHTING AND SAFETY PROJECT (CIP 15053)
Adopted Resolution 23-66 approving an amendment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the appropriation of $400,000 of CDBG grant funds to the CIP budget for CIP 15053, authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an increase to the purchase order for electrical materials from JAM Services, Inc, in the amount of $40,252.25, and authorized the City Manager to execute changes up to 10% ($4,025) of the value of the increase to the purchase order.

8. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-68 REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE AND SUBMIT AN FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM TO THE

SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Adopted Resolution 23-68 requesting authorization to execute and submit the FY 2023/24 Transportation Development Act claim to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments.

9. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-73 ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED FOR SUBDIVISION 5176, “THE RIVERS PHASE II”
226
3 Adopted Resolution 23-73, accepting the public improvements required of Subdivision 5176, “The Rivers, Phase II”.

MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Early
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Early, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: Alcala;

10. Community Development

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH

SCI CONSULTING TO PRODUCE A STORM DRAINAGE & STORMWATER FINANCE PLAN Approved a $95,828 professional services contract with SCI Consulting Group, delegated authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the contract, authorized the City Manager to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the Contract for Services, with approval from the City Attorney, and authorized the City Manager or designee to execute amendments or change orders up to 15% ($14,374) of the contract.

11. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-51 TERMINATING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH GOLD MOUNTAIN DISTRIBUTION AT 3939 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE SUITE C Continued the item to adopt Resolution 23-51 terminating the development agreement with Gold Mountain Distribution and direct staff to pursue any necessary actions to ensure that this business no longer operates at the subject location to a date yet to be determined.

MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: Early; ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: (None); RECUSED: (None);

12. Economic Development & Housing
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-10 AND AWARD OF CONTRACT TO TURTON

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE FOR CLUB PHEASANT DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY

CONSULTANT SERVICES
Adopted Resolution 23-10 appropriating funding from Fund 106 in an amount not to exceed $200,000 for Club Pheasant property management, marketing and disposition services, awarded a Professional Services Contract with Turton Commercial Real Estate for Club Pheasant development advisory consultant services in an amount not to exceed $100,000, authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute the Contract with Turton Commercial Real Estate in the amount of $100,000, authorized the City Manager to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the Contract with approval from the City Attorney, and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute Contract amendments up to 15% ($15,000) of the value of the Contract.

13. Finance
CONSIDERATION OF THE TREASURER’S QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT ON THE CITY’S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2023 Received and filed the Treasurer’s Quarterly Financial Report on the City’s investment portfolio for the period ending June 30, 2023.

14. Finance
227
4 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-77 APPROVING THE ESCHEATMENT AND TRANSFER OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 50050- 50057
Adopted Resolution 23-77 approving the escheatment and transfer of unclaimed funds in accordance with California Government Code Sections 50050-50057.

15. Fire
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-74 AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL FUNDING TO THE

FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW/INSPECTION SERVICES Adopted Resolution 23-74 authorizing additional funding to the Fire Department for construction plan review and inspection services.

16. Parks & Recreation
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-69 AMENDING THE CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) AND AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO B & M

BUILDERS, INC FOR THE RECREATION CENTER TENNIS COURTS LIGHTING AND DRAINAGE PROJECT (CIP 62143)
Adopted Resolution 23-69 amending the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the additional funding needed to complete the Recreation Center Tennis Courts Lighting and Drainage Project (CIP 62143), awarded a construction contract to B & M Builders, Inc in an amount not to exceed $1,227,002 for the Recreation Center Tennis Courts Lighting and Drainage Project), authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with B & M Builders, Inc in the amount of $1,227,002, authorized the City Manager, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the contract with B & M Builders, Inc with approval from the City Attorney, and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute contract amendments up to 10% ($122,700) of the value of the contract.

17. Police
CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF THE FISCAL YEAR 23/24 OTS STEP GRANT AND

TRAFFIC RECORDS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AWARDS AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-56 APPROVING FOR BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FOR OTS OPERATIONS AND

EQUIPMENT
Adopted Resolution 23-56 authorizing the acceptance of the FY 23/24 California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) grant award for $83,800 and the Traffic Records Improvement Project grant award for $24,800 and authorized the City Manager or designee to sign the contracts for the equipment purchases related to the grant.

18. Police

CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE ICU TECHNOLOGIES EVOVL WEAPONS DETECTION SYSTEM PROPOSAL AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-72 APPROVING

BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PROPOSAL
Adopted resolution 23-72 authorizing the acceptance of the ICU Technologies Evolv weapons detection system proposal and the appropriation of $52,953 of one-time expense in FY 2023/24 and $13,968 of ongoing annual expense in FYs 2023/24 and 2024/25 from the Measure N Fund, Public Safety Category and authorized the City Manager or designee to execute a contract with ICU Technologies for equipment and software subscription.

19. Police

CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT AWARD AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-38 APPROVING BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FOR BOMB

SQUAD EQUIPMENT
228
5 Authorized the acceptance of the $82,000 FY 2021 Sacramento Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) grant award and adopt Resolution 23-38 appropriating funds for the purchase of the associated equipment and authorized the City Manager or designee to sign the contracts for the equipment purchases related to the grant.

20. Public Works
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-58 AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET AND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT 1 FOR THE SUMMIT

PIPELINES CONTRACT FOR THE CLOSED CIRCUIT TV (CCTV) INSPECTION & CLEANING OF SEWERS PROJECT (CIP 33029)
Found that the CCTV Inspection & Cleaning of Sewers Project is exempt from CEQA analysis under the Class 1 Categorical Exemption, under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Article 19, Section 15301, adopted Resolution 23-58 amending the Capital Improvement Program, delegated authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendment 1 with Summit Pipelines for an amount not to exceed $33,327 for the CCTV Inspection & Cleaning of Sewers Project t (CIP 33029), and delegated authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Contract Amendment 1 with Summit Pipelines for an amount not to exceed $33,327 for the CCTV Inspection & Cleaning of Sewers Project (CIP 33029).

21. City Manager's Office
REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY I-B-7 AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 23-10 BANNING WEAPONS FROM CITY FACILITIES Approved interim Administrative Policy I-B-7 , which would immediately ban weapons from City facilities, waived first reading and read by title and only Ordinance 23-10, which would create an ongoing ban on weapons in City facilities, and authorized the City Manager or his designee to take any actions necessary to effectuate the security measures necessary to effectuate Administrative Policy I-B-7 and Ordinance 23-10, including but not limited to, drafting of operational protocols governing the use of scanning devices to protect resident security in City buildings, subject to approval by the City Attorney.

22. City Manager's Office

CONSIDERATION OF UPDATES AND APPROVAL OF JOB DESCRIPTIONS, UPDATES TO THE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24, UPDATES TO ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY IV-B-10, UPDATES TO THE AUTHORIZED POSITION LIST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24, AND RESOLUTION 23-78 APPROVING RELATED BUDGET

APPROPRIATIONS
Approved the amended job description for the Capital Improvement Manager, approved the job description for Construction Inspection Manager, approved the job description for Construction Inspector I/II/III, approved the amended and updated Authorized Position List (APL) for Fiscal Year 2023/24, approved the amended and updated publicly available pay schedule (Classification Plan) for Fiscal Year 2023/24, approved Administrative Policy IV-B-10, Travel, Meals & Related Expense Reimbursement Policy for Elected & Appointed Officials, and approved Resolution 23-78 authorizing budget appropriations to fund the changes proposed in the revised APL, and revised Classification Plan.

23. City Manager's Office

CONSIDERATION OF AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF YOLO FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Approved and authorized the Mayor to execute the attached 1-year, $943,029 agreement with the County of Yolo for animal control services for fiscal year 2023-24. 229
6 24. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 16, 2023 REGULAR

MEETING OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR

AGENCY, AND WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
Approved the minutes of the August 16, 2023 Regular Meetings of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

25. Economic Development & Housing
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-71 APPROVING THE

ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $35,000,000 TO FINANCE AND REFINANCE THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, DEVELOPMENT AND EQUIPPING OF THE 219-221 5TH

STREET APARTMENTS
Conducted a public hearing under the Tax and Equity Responsibility Act and, upon closing the hearing and approved Resolution 23-71 approving the issuance of revenue bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority in an amount not to exceed $35 million to finance and refinance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of the 219-221 5th Street Apartments.

MOTION: Early SECOND: Alcala
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Early, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None);

26. Community Development
PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-70 APPROVING THE RIVER

ONE PHASE TWO DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESIGN
Conducted the public hearing, found that the River One Phase Two project design Project is covered by the Raley’s Landing Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and that none of the conditions specified in CEQA Guidelines §15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred and approved Resolution 23-70, approving the proposed design of the River One Phase Two project as required by the Development Agreement.

MOTION: Sulpizio Hull SECOND: Early
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Early, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None);

REGULAR AGENDA

27. Community Development

PUBLIC WORKSHOP REGARDING RETAIL CANNABIS SALES ADMINISTRATIVE

PROCEDURES AND EQUITY PILOT PROGRAM
Heard a presentation from staff regarding the proposed administrative procedures and equity pilot program and provide direction to staff
230
7 28. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 23-8 AMENDING THE WEST SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL CODE TO MEMORIALIZE THE COUNCIL’S ONE CITY

GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK
Waived the first reading and read by title only Ordinance 23-8 amending Section 2.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code to include the Council’s One City governance framework.

MOTION: Early SECOND: Orozco
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Early, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None);
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART II

29. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS
No reports.

30. COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS, REAPPOINTMENTS, REMOVALS TO/FROM CITY AND NONCITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS None.

31. PART II
A. Council Calendar
No report.

B. City Manager Report
No report.

C. City Attorney Report
No report.

D. Staff Direction from City Council Members
None.

E. Future Agenda Item Requests by Council
F. City Manager's Office
Request from Councilmember Sulpizio Hull - Include Proclamation for Pregnancy and Infant Loss Awareness Month on the October 18 agenda
There was consensus to include this item on the October 18 agenda.

G. Adjourn
Adjourned the meeting at 11:29 p.m.
231
8 MOTION: Early SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Early, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None);
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on [DATE].

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
232

WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL AND

WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND

WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
City Council Regular Meeting
OCTOBER 18, 2023 MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m.

Present
Mayor Pro Tem Quirina Orozco; Council Member Norma Alcala; Council Member Dawnte Early; Council Member Verna Sulpizio Hull
Absent
Mayor Martha Guerrero
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART I
City Attorney Mitchell reported that the City Council met in Closed Session and no action was taken.

1. PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WITHIN THE

JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL
The Council is prohibited from discussing issues not on the agenda brought to them at this time.

According to State Law (the Brown Act), items must first be noticed on the agenda before any discussion or action.

The City Council received public comment on items not on the agenda within the City's jurisdiction.

PRESENTATIONS

2. City Manager's Office
PRESENTATION OF THE 2023 HELEN PUTNAM AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE IN CITYBUSINESS RELATIONS FOR THE WEST SACRAMENTO HOME RUN PAID INTERNSHIP

PROGRAM
The City Council received the presentation of the 2023 Helen Putnam Award for Excellence in City-Business Relations to the City for the West Sacramento Home Run Paid Internship Program from the League of California Cities.

3. City Manager's Office
PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING OCTOBER 2023 AS PREGNANCY AND

INFANT LOSS AWARENESS MONTH
The City Council presented a proclamation recognizing October 2023 as Pregnancy and Infant Loss Awareness Month.

4. City Manager's Office
PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING OCTOBER 22 TO OCTOBER 29 AS

CALIFORNIA FLOOD PREPAREDNESS WEEK
233
2 The City Council presented a proclamation to recognize the 2023 Flood Preparedness Week.

CONSENT AGENDA
Approved the Consent Agenda.

MOTION: Early SECOND: Alcala
Roll Call Vote
YES: Orozco, Alcala, Early, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Guerrero; RECUSED: (None);

5. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT 2 TO THE ON-CALL CONTRACT FOR

SERVICES WITH CMD WEST-MAVERICK ALLIANCE COMPANY
Approved Amendment 2 to the Contract for Services with CMD West-Maverick Alliance Company in the amount of $306,000 for on-call right of way acquisition services and property management services and delegated authority to the City Manager or his designee to execute the contract amendment substantially in the form attached, issue notices to proceed (NTPs), approve amendments to the scope and undertake any and all actions necessary to implement the contract.

6. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-80 ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED FOR PARCEL MAP 5151
Adopted Resolution 23-80, accepting the public improvements required of Parcel Map 5151.

7. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-82 AUTHORIZING USE OF DEPARTMENT OF CANNABIS CONTROL RETAIL ACCESS GRANT FUNDS AND RESOLUTION 23-83 APPROVING

RELATED BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS
Adopted resolution 23-82 authorizing the acceptance of the 2023 Department of Cannabis Control Retail Access Grant of $235,000; adopted resolution 23-83 approving the appropriation of the grant funds awarded; and authorized the City Manager or designee to sign the grant agreement once received from the Department of Cannabis Control.

8. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 23-8 AMENDING THE WEST SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL CODE TO MEMORIALIZE THE COUNCIL’S ONE CITY

GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK
Waived the second reading and adopted Ordinance 23-8 amending Section 2.16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code to include the Council’s One City governance framework.

9. City Manager's Office

REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 23-10 BANNING WEAPONS FROM CITY FACILITIES
Waived the second reading and adopted Ordinance 23-10, which would create an ongoing ban on weapons in City facilities.
234
3 PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

REGULAR AGENDA

10. City Manager's Office

CONSIDERATION OF CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO JOINING THE YOLO ANIMAL SERVICES

PLANNING AGENCY JOINT POWERS AGENCY AND APPOINTMENT TO THE JPA Authorized the Mayor or her designee to approve the City joining the Yolo Animal Services Planning Agency JPA and authorized the City Manager to take any actions necessary to effectuate the joining of the JPA and appointed Mayor Guerrero to serve as the West Sacramento representative to the JPA.

MOTION: Early SECOND: Alcala
Roll Call Vote
YES: Orozco, Alcala, Early, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Guerrero; RECUSED: (None);
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART II

11. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS
Councilmember Early reported on the study mission trip to Toronto. Councilmember Early spoke about the annual Rock the Block event.

Mayor Pro Tem Orozco also spoke about the study mission trip and riverfront development.

Mayor Pro Temp Orozco reported on the meeting of the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District Board Meeting. Mayor Pro Temp Orozco spoke about the annual Rock the Block event.

Councilmember Alcala spoke about the annual Rock the Block event.

Councilmember Sulpizio Hull spoke about the annual Rock the Block event.

12. COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS, REAPPOINTMENTS, REMOVALS TO/FROM CITY AND NONCITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS None.

13. PART II
A. Council Calendar
No report.

B. City Manager Report
No report. .

C. City Attorney Report
No report.
235
4 D. Staff Direction from City Council Members
None.

E. Future Agenda Item Requests by Council
None.

F. Adjourn
Adjourned at 8:01 p.m.

MOTION: Early SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Orozco, Alcala, Early, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Guerrero; RECUSED: (None);
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on [DATE].

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
236

WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL AND

WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND

WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
City Council Regular Meeting
NOVEMBER 1, 2023 MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 7:06 p.m.

Present
Mayor Martha Guerrero; Council Member Norma Alcala; Council Member Dawnte Early; Mayor Pro Tem Quirina Orozco; Council Member Verna Sulpizio Hull GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART I
City Attorney Booher reported that the City Council met in Closed Session and no action was taken.

1. PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WITHIN THE

JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL
The Council is prohibited from discussing issues not on the agenda brought to them at this time.

According to State Law (the Brown Act), items must first be noticed on the agenda before any discussion or action.

The City Council received public comment on items not on the agenda within the City's jurisdiction.

PRESENTATIONS

2. City Manager's Office
PRESENTATION OF THE 2023 HELEN PUTNAM AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE IN CITYBUSINESS RELATIONS FOR THE WEST SACRAMENTO HOME RUN PAID INTERNSHIP

PROGRAM
The City Council received the presentation of the 2023 Helen Putnam Award for Excellence in City-Business Relations to the City for the West Sacramento Home Run Paid Internship Program from the League of California Cities.

3. City Manager's Office
PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION HONORING NOVEMBER 11, 2023 AS VETERANS DAY The City Council presented a proclamation recognizing November 11, 2023 as Veterans Day.

CONSENT AGENDA
Approved the Consent Agenda.

MOTION: Early SECOND: Alcala
Roll Call Vote
237
2 YES: Guerrero, Alcala, Early, Orozco, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None);

4. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-84 AMENDING THE CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET AND APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH PSOMAS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE 6TH STREET & CUMMINS WAY TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT (CIP 12023)
Found that approval of a professional services contract with PSOMAS is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment pursuant to CEQA guidelines section 15060(c) and 15378(a); adopted Resolution 23-84 amending the Capital Improvement Program budget; approved a professional services contract for engineering services with Psomas for a Feasibility Study and Engineering Design for traffic calming measures for the 6th Street & Cummins Way Traffic Safety Project (CIP 12023); authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a professional services contract with Psomas for an amount not to exceed $99,930; authorized the City Manager, or his designee to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the professional services contract, with approval from the City Attorney; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments up to 15% ($15,000) of the total contract amount; and delegated authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to extend the term of the contract, if necessary.

5. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 23-9 AMENDING TITLE 10 (VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE REESTABLISHMENT OF SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (CIP 12019)
Waived the second reading and adopted Ordinance 23-9, amending Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Municipal Code relating to the reestablishment of speed limits on certain streets within the City of West Sacramento.

6. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT 8 FOR THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH WOOD RODGERS, INC. FOR THE RIVERFRONT STREET EXTENSION AND 5TH STREET WIDENING PROJECT (CIP 15032)
Approved Amendment 8 of the contract for professional services with Wood Rodgers, Inc. to extend the term of the contract until June 30, 2024; authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment 8 with Wood Rodgers, Inc.; authorized the City Manager to execute nonsubstantive changes or modifications, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute amendments to further extend the term of the contract, if necessary.

7. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 WITH GHD, INC. FOR THE

SACRAMENTO AVENUE COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP 10048) FOR AWARD OF GREEN MEANS GO GRANT
Approved and authorized the City Manager, or their designee, to execute Contract Amendment No. 1 to the professional services contract with GHD, Inc. and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the contract with GHD, Inc. with approval from the City Attorney.

8. Economic Development & Housing
238
3 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-81 AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S ACCEPTANCE OF A PUBLIC USE PROPERTY TRANSFER LOCATED AT 450 LIGHTHOUSE DRIVE (APN 010-523- 038) FROM THE WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY Adopted Resolution 23-81 authorizing the acceptance of the public use property transfer located at 450 Lighthouse Drive (APN 010-523-038) from the Successor Agency.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

REGULAR AGENDA
None.

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART II

9. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS
Councilmember Early reported on the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) tour of South Sacramento County housing and reported on the Yolo County Housing Authority meeting. Councilmember Early also spoke about the Huddle groundbreaking.

Mayor Guerreo reported on the Bloomberg City Lab event.

10. COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS, REAPPOINTMENTS, REMOVALS TO/FROM CITY AND NONCITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Appointed Councilmember Sulpizio Hull as the Alternate to the Yolo Animal Servies Planning Agency JPA.

MOTION: Early SECOND: Orozco
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Alcala, Early, Orozco, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None);

11. PART II
A. Council Calendar
No report.

B. City Manager Report
City Manager Laurel stated that he will be attending the US Conference of Mayors symposium on homelessness and an event arranged by the Governor focused on housing and climate.

C. City Attorney Report
No report.

D. Staff Direction from City Council Members
239
4 None.

E. Future Agenda Item Requests by Council
None.

F. Adjourn
Adjourned at 8:11 p.m.

MOTION: Early SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Alcala, Early, Orozco, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None);
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on [DATE].

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
240

WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL AND

WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND

WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
City Council Regular Meeting
NOVEMBER 15, 2023 MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m.

Present
Mayor Martha Guerrero; Council Member Dawnte Early; Council Member Norma Alcala; Council Member Verna Sulpizio Hull
Absent
Mayor Pro Tem Quirina Orozco
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART I
City Attorney Mitchell reported that the City Council met in Closed Session and no action was taken.

1. PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WITHIN THE

JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL
The Council is prohibited from discussing issues not on the agenda brought to them at this time.

According to State Law (the Brown Act), items must first be noticed on the agenda before any discussion or action.

The City Council received public comment on items not on the agenda within the City's jurisdiction.

PRESENTATIONS

2. City Manager's Office
PRESENTATION OF A CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING NOVEMBER 2023 AS

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH
The City Council presented a proclamation declaring November 2023 as Native American Heritage Month.

CONSENT AGENDA
Approved the Consent Agenda.

MOTION: Early SECOND: Alcala
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None);

3. Capital Projects
241
2 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-89 AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM (CIP) AND CONSIDERATION OF AWARD FOR A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO

BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS, INC FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL FUEL CELL BACKUP SYSTEM PROJECT (CIP 12025).

Found the procurement and installation of traffic signal equipment is exempt from environmental review under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15301 Class 1 (b) of the California Environmental Quality Act; approved Plans and Specifications for the Fuel Cell Backup Project; adopted Resolution 23-89 amending the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for CIP 12025; awarded a construction contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $474,120.00; authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute the construction contract with Bear Electrical Solutions, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $474,120.00; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute changes or modifications to the construction contract, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments or change orders up to 10% ($47,412) of the value of the contract.

4. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT TO PAINE CONSTRUCTION INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE FIRE STATION 44 FACILITY REPAIRS PROJECT (CIP 51042)
Found that the construction contract with Paine Construction Inc. for the Fire Station 44 Facility Repairs Project (CIP 51042) is exempt from review under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the Categorical Exemptions under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6 Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Sections 15301, 15303, and 15304 and find that the determination represents the independent judgement of the City; awarded a construction contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Paine Construction Inc. in the amount of $138,000; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with Paine Construction Inc. in the amount not to exceed $138,000; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modification to the contract with Paine Construction Inc. with the approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendments, up to 15% ($20,700) of the value of the contract.

5. Capital Projects

CONSIDERATION TO AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO BAY AREA CONCRETES, INC. FOR THE RECREATION CENTER POOL DECK REPAIRS PHASE II PROJECT (CIP 52045) Found that the proposed Recreation Center Pool Deck Repairs Phase II Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the Categorical Exemptions under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Sections 15301, 15303, and 15304, and find that the determination represents the independent judgment of the City; awarded a construction contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Bay Area Concretes, Inc, in the amount of $199,680; authorized to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction contract with Bay Area Concretes, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $199,680; authorized the City Manager, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the contract with Bay Area Concretes, Inc, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee to execute contract amendments up to 10%, ($19,968) of the value of the of the contract.

6. Economic Development & Housing
CONSIDERATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT WITH R1P2, LLC, FOR THE RIVER ONE PHASE 2 PROJECT
Approved the Affordable Housing Agreement with R1P2, LLC, in substantially the form included as Attachment 1 for the River One Phase 2 project (Agreement) and authorized the City Manager 242
3 or his designee to execute the Agreement and make non-substantive corrections or modifications with the approval of the City Attorney.

7. Economic Development & Housing

CONSIDERATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT WITH SMART GROWTH

INVESTORS II, LP FOR THE BRIDGE DISTRICT PHASE VI PROJECT Approved the Affordable Housing Agreement with Smart Growth Investors II, LP, in substantially the form included as Attachment 1, for the Bridge District Phase VI Project (Agreement) and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute the Agreement and make nonsubstantive corrections or modifications with the approval of the City Attorney.

8. City Manager's Office

CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF THE TOTAL TENTATIVE AGREEMENT ON ECONOMIC

TERMS FOR THE NEW MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO AND THE WEST SACRAMENTO BATTALION CHIEFS’ ASSOCIATION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 23-91 APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2023/24 AND 2024/25
Approved the total tentative agreement on economic terms for a new two-year Memorandum of Understanding between the City of West Sacramento and the West Sacramento Battalion Chiefs' Association (BCA); approved the updated Classification Plan (Salary Schedule) for the BCA; and adopted Resolution 23-91 approving amendments to the approved biennial budget for Fiscal Years 2023/24 and FY 2024/25 to fund the proposed salary and benefit changes.

9. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 23-76 SETTING THE TIME AND DATE FOR THE 2024/25

REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Adopted Resolution 23-76 setting the time and date for City Council meetings commencing February 1, 2024 through January 31, 2025.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

REGULAR AGENDA

10. Community Development
PUBLIC WORKSHOP REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF

THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO FACILITATE TINY HOMES ON WHEELS AS LEGAL DWELLINGS The City Council received a presentation from staff; took public comment in a workshop format and provided direction to staff regarding the proposed Municipal Code amendments.

11. Community Development
WORKSHOP ON THE FUTURE OF CITY’S ON-DEMAND RIDESHARE PROGRAM The City Council received a staff presentation on the future of the On-Demand Rideshare Program and provided feedback and direction to staff on priority service operations and parameters. The City Council took public comment on this item.

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART II

12. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS
243
4 Councilmember Sulpizio Hull reported on the November 2 meeting of the Executive Commission to Address Homelessness and the November 6 meeting of the Yolo Habitat Conservancy.

Councilmember Alcala spoke about local community events.

Councilmember Early reported on the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) meeting and the Yolo Transportation District meeting.

Mayor Guerrero reported on the US Conference of Mayors which focused on homelessness.

13. COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS, REAPPOINTMENTS, REMOVALS TO/FROM CITY AND NONCITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS City Clerk Cusmir provided an update on Commission and Board vacancies.

14. PART II
A. Council Calendar
City Manager Laurel provided an update on the Council Calendar.

B. City Manager Report
City Manager Laurel reported on his most recent conferences.

C. City Attorney Report
No report.

D. Staff Direction from City Council Members
None.

E. Future Agenda Item Requests by Council
None.

F. Adjourn
Adjourned at 10:14 p.m.

MOTION: Early SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None);
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
244
5 Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on [DATE].

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
245

WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL AND

WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND

WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
City Council Regular Meeting
SEPTEMBER 18, 2024 MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m.

Present
Mayor Martha Guerrero; Mayor Pro Tem Dawnte Early; Council Member Quirina Orozco; Council Member Norma Alcala; Council Member Verna Sulpizio Hull GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART I

1. PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WITHIN THE

JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL
The Council is prohibited from discussing issues not on the agenda brought to them at this time.

According to State Law (the Brown Act), items must first be noticed on the agenda before any discussion or action.

The City Council received public comment on items not on the agenda within the City's jurisdiction.

PRESENTATIONS

2. City Manager's Office
PRESENTATION OF A CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING SEPTEMBER 15 TO OCTOBER 15, 2024 AS HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH
The City Council presented a proclamation recognizing September 15 to October 15, 2024, as Hispanic Heritage Month.

CONSENT AGENDA
Approved the Consent Agenda.

MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Orozco
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None);

3. Capital Projects

CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT TO BAYSHORE FENCE COMPANY FOR THE

CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF THE VEHICLE GATES FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT GATE REPLACEMENT PROJECT (WO 83065)
Found that Police Department Gates Replacement Project (WO 83065) is exempt from review under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6 Chapter 3 246
2 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Section 15301 and find that the determination represents the independent judgement of the City; awarded a construction contract to Bayshore Fence Company for the Police Department Gates Replacement Project, which includes the construction and installation of four (4) vehicle security gates and the associated drive mechanisms; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with Bayshore Fence Company in an amount not to exceed $92,351; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the contract, including extensions for time, with Bayshore Fence Company with the approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendments or change orders up to 15% ($13,852) of the value of the contract.

4. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 24-103 REGARDING THE EMERGENCY

CONTRACT WITH ACCO ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER HVAC PROJECT (CIP 52083)
Found that Community Center HVAC Repair project is exempt from CEQA analysis under CEQA Guidelines 15269. According to the CEQA Guidelines, an emergency includes emergency repairs to public or privately owned service facilities necessary to maintain service essential to the public health, safety, or welfare; and adopted, by a minimum four-fifths vote of the Council, Resolution 24-103, regarding the Emergency Contract with Acco Systems, Inc for the Community Center HVAC Repair Project.

5. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 24-98 AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM (CIP) AND AMENDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH

INTERWEST FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS (CIP 52068)
Adopted Resolution 24-98 amending the Capital Improvement Program; approved Amendment 1 to the Contract for Professional Services with Interwest for the City Standard Specifications and Details Update (CIP 52068) in the amount of $102,000 and adjust the contract contingency to a total of 10% ($37,278); delegated Authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment 1 with Interwest; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute nonsubstantive changes or modifications, including extensions for time, with approval from the City Attorney; and delegated authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to the contract of up to $37,275 (10% of the total contract value).

6. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 24-99 ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED FOR PARCEL MAP 5125, LOCATED AT 425 G STREET
Adopted Resolution 24-99, accepting the public improvements for Parcel Map 5125 (425 G Street).

7. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 24-89 REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE AND SUBMIT THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM TO THE

SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Authorized the claim and allocation of up to $5,232,695.92 in Transportation Development Act Funds for Fiscal Year 2024-25 to support fixed-route, paratransit, and on-demand transit services, as well as the associated administration, planning and maintenance costs and authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute and submit the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Transportation Development Act claim to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments. 247
3 8. Community Development

CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC. FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CLARKSBURG BRANCH LINE EXTENSION: SOUTH CITY LIMIT TO CLARKSBURG (CIP 14063) AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 24-84 APPROVING RELATED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
Awarded a contract for professional services with Mark Thomas for the development of the Clarksburg Branch Line Extension: South City Limit to Clarksburg (Project); authorized the City Manager, or their designee, to execute a professional services contract with Mark Thomas in the amount of $1,988,103 for the Clarksburg Branch Line Extension: South City Limit to Clarksburg; authorized the City Manager, or their designee, to make contract amendments up to a 10% contingency limit of $198,810; authorized the City Manager, or their designee, to execute nonsubstantive changes and modifications, or extensions for time, with approval from the City Attorney; and approved Resolution 24-84 authorizing the transfer of $248,761 from the One-Time General Fund (Fund 107) for contract tasks, staff time and resources as required to complete the Project.

9. Economic Development & Housing

CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT TO ROYSTON, HANAMOTO, ALLEY, & ABEY

FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG RIVERWALK TRAIL ADJACENT TO 805 RIVERFRONT STREET (CIP 15132)
Awarded Contract to RHAA for design services for frontage improvements along Riverwalk Trail (CIP 15132); authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the contract with RHAA in the amount of $299,150; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to make contract amendments up to 15% of the total contract value ($44,872.50); and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications, including timeextensions as needed, with approval from the City Attorney.

10. Finance
CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 24-101 APPROVING THE FINANCING OF CERTAIN FIRE APPARATUS AND DECLARING THE CITY’S INTENT TO REIMBURSE ITSELF

FROM THE PROCEEDS OF DEBT FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES
Authorized the City Manager, or designee, to enter into a Master Lease-Purchase Agreement with JP Morgan Chase Bank; authorized the City Manager, or designee, to accept a proposed equipment lease, and to enter into a lease-purchase agreement with JP Morgan Chase Bank to finance the purchase of the fire apparatus and equipment in the amount of $1,176,950; and adopted Resolution 24-101 approving the financing of the Type 1 Fire Pumper and declaring the City’s intent to reimburse itself from the proceeds of debt for certain expenditures.

11. Finance
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 24-102 ESTABLISHING APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
Adopted Resolution 24-102 establishing an Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2024/25.

12. Police
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS 24-93 AND 24-104 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF A

BSCC GRANT AWARD AND APPROVING RELATED APPROPRIATIONS FOR A COMMUNITY

GUN SAFETY PROJECT
Adopted Resolution 24-93 authorizing acceptance of the 2024 BSCC Byrne State Crisis Intervention Project (Byrne SCIP) grant award for $475,008 and related appropriations; adopted Resolution 24-104 authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to sign the acceptance 248
4 paperwork associated with the grant; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to sign the subaward agreements.

13. Public Works

CONFIRMATION OF THE EMERGENCY CONTRACT WITH ACTION ASPHALT PAVING & MAINTENANCE, INC. FOR THE GRANDE VISTA CONCRETE REPAIR
Received information regarding the emergency contract with Action Asphalt Paving & Maintenance, Inc for the Grande Vista concrete repair and confirmed that the conditions constituting an emergency continue to exist and justify continuation of the work.

14. Public Works

CONSIDERATION OF A CONTRACT AMENDMENT TO ACTION PAVING & ASPHALT FOR

CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE ON-CALL ARTERIAL STREET PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT (CIP 17025)
Found that the construction contract with Action Paving & Asphalt for the On-Call Arterial Street Pavement Repair Project (CIP 17025) is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the Categorical Exemptions under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Sections 15301, 15302, and 15304, and find that the determination represents the independent judgment of the City; approved and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction amendment with Action Paving & Asphalt in the amount of $250,000 for the On-Call Arterial Street Pavement Repair Project (CIP 17025); authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments or change orders up to 5% ($46,625) of the total value of the contract for CIP 17025; and authorized additional contract costs of up to $250,000 for prefunded, pre-approved CIP projects upon request from the Capital Projects Department, for a total contract value of $1,182,500.

15. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 7, 2024 AND AUGUST 21, 2024 REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL,

REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AND WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING

AUTHORITY
Approved the minutes of the August 7, 2024 and August 21, 2024 Regular Meetings of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority.

16. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 24-12 AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.20 RELATED TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Waived the second reading and read by title and number only, Ordinance 24-12 amending Municipal Code Chapter 2.20 related to boards and commissions and adopted Ordinance 24-12 amending Municipal Code Chapter 2.20 related to boards and commissions to be effective January 1, 2025 with the next the board and commission members appointment in 2025.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

17. Community Development
PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 24-97 ADOPTING SACRAMENTO AVENUE COMPLETE STREET PLAN (CIP 10048 - SACRAMENTO AVENUE COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PLAN), AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 24- 105 AMENDING THE PROJECT BUDGET
249
5 Conducted a public hearing; found the adoption of the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act and qualifies for a Statutory Exemption under Senate Bill 922 as an active transportation plan pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 21080.20; approved Resolution 24-97 adopting the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan; and approved Resolution 24-105 amending the project budget.

MOTION: Sulpizio Hull SECOND: Early
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None);

REGULAR AGENDA

18. Economic Development & Housing

WORKSHOP ON PROPOSED SMALL BUSINESS ACCELERATOR PROGRAM Received a workshop presentation and provided feedback on the proposed Small Business Accelerator Program.

19. Community Development

UPDATE ON THE COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY ACTION PLAN
This item will be rescheduled for a future City Council meeting.

20. Finance
CONSIDERATION OF THE TREASURER’S QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT ON THE CITY’S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2024 This item will be rescheduled for a future City Council meeting.

GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART II

21. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS
Councilmember Sulpizio Hull reported on the September 5 meeting of the Executive Commission to Address Homelessness, the September 16 meeting of the Yolo Habitat Conservancy, and a meeting of the Yolo Subbasin Sustainable Groundwater Agency.

Councilmember Alcala reported on the September 11 Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District meeting.

Councilmember Orozco reported on the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District Board September 11 meeting and the Health Education Council West Sacramento Accountable Community for Health event.

Mayor Pro Tem Early reported on the September 9 meeting of the Yolo Transportation District.

Mayor Guerrero reported on the City of West Sacramento/Yolo County 2x2 meeting.

22. PART II
A. Council Calendar
Assistant City Manager Berlin provided the report on the Council Calendar. 250
6 B. City Manager Report
City Manager Laurel provided a report.

C. City Attorney Report
No report.

D. Staff Direction from City Council Members
None.

E. Future Agenda Item Requests by Council
Motion to approve all of the requests made by Council.

MOTION: Early SECOND: Alcala
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None);
City Manager's Office
Request from Mayor Guerrero to issue a City Council Proclamation recognizing Breast Cancer Awareness at a future City Council meeting.

City Manager's Office
Request from Mayor Guerrero to issue a City Council proclamation recognizing the Girls' Softball team at a future City Council meeting.

City Manager's Office
Request from Councilmember Orozco to issue a City Council Proclamation recognizing Filipino Heritage Month at a future City Council meeting.

F. Adjourn
Adjourned the meeting at 10:39 p.m. in memory of Robert Ansell.

MOTION: Early SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None);
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on [DATE].

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
251

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 6, 2024 ITEM # 16
SUBJECT:

PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING AN APPEAL TO THE PROPOSED YARBROUGH PHASE I VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 5224
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Daniel Berumen, AICP, Senior Planner
Community Development Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this item is to facilitate the City Council’s review of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of the proposed Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (VTSM) No. 5224 that would create 548 parcels for Phase I of Yarbrough Master Plan Development.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the public hearing regarding an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of the proposed Yarbrough Phase I Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map; and

2. Adopt Resolution 24-119:
a. Finding that, pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, no subsequent environmental review is required prior to approval of proposed Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map because the City as lead agency for the Project has determined there is no substantial evidence of a) new significant environmental effects, b) substantial increases in the severity of previously identified environmental effects, or c) new information of substantial importance that would require major changes to the previously certified Yarbough Environmental Impact Report adopted by the City Council on June 18, 2008;
b. Finding that Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5224 is consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) adopted on June 18, 2008, prepared for the Project; and
c. Denying the appeal and confirm the Planning Commission’s approval of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5224.

BACKGROUND
The Yarbrough project area is comprised of approximately 713 acres of undeveloped land in the southwestern part of Southport (see Attachment 3). In 2006, the Yarbrough landowner submitted development plans to convert the undeveloped parcels to a residential village which would include 3,004 residential units, a village core with commercial and mixed land uses, and extensive open space, including a 55.9-acre lake park and canal system.

Implementation of the plan required amendments to the Southport Framework Plan Land Use Diagram, a consistency finding with Resolution 06-63, and a development agreement (DA) with a 15-year term. The project was approved by the City Council in June 2008 and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified to satisfy requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project materials can be found on the City’s website at Yarbrough Master Plan | City of West Sacramento.

The project, which is intended to be built out in a total of four phases, would establish a network of streets and trails providing both motorized and nonmotorized access. This includes a system of landscaped pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian trails, including the lake promenade; a multi-use regional recreation trail along the levee system on the western and southern sides of the project site; Class 2 bike lanes along Jefferson Boulevard, Southport Parkway, and collector roads within the project site; and pedestrian connectors along selected local streets. The Project would also include a comprehensive system of arterial and collector streets, consistent with the City’s General Plan Mobility Element. Jefferson Boulevard would be expanded to four lanes from the northern edge of the project site to the intersection with Southport Parkway in the village core; it would transition to two 252
Appeal of Yarbrough VTSM Phase I
November 6, 2024

lanes south of that point. Jefferson Boulevard would cross the proposed lake on a new bridge near the village core. Jefferson Boulevard would be built as a parkway, with a landscaped median, standard street lighting and curbs, gutters, sidewalks, landscaping and bike lanes on each side. This would recognize the existing location of Southport Parkway, located west of Jefferson Boulevard and provide a connection with Village Parkway, located east of Jefferson Boulevard.

To allow the project to proceed, the landowner seeks to submit a series of tentative subdivision maps dividing the property into residential, commercial, open space, recreational, and other lots. Tentative subdivision maps are subject to review by the City’s Planning Commission; tentative subdivision maps are only considered by the City Council if the Planning Commission decision is appealed. The City Council ministerially approves final subdivision maps; ministerial acts in California mean that the applications must be approved if they meet all conditions of the tentative map and are in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act. To date, no tentative maps or other project authorizations have been issued since the Project was approved in 2008.

The applicant applied for a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (VTSM). A VTSM provides the same function as a Tentative Subdivision Map, but with additional protections for the developer regarding the regulations and standards in place at the time of approval. Upon approval of a VTSM, the applicant is granted vesting rights. This means that the development will be governed by the ordinances, policies and standards in effect at the time the VTSM is approved. This provides a significant level of certainty for the applicant/developer, protecting against changes in development standards and fees that may occur after the map’s approval.

On August 15, 2024, the Planning Commission held a continued public hearing for the Phase I Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (VTSM) and the Development Agreement amendments. Following a public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to adopt Resolution 24-2PC (see Attachment 1) approving the VTSM and Resolution 24-3PC recommending the City Council approve Ordinance 24-11 adopting the Amended and Restated Development Agreement (the “ARDA”) subject to the conditions and findings.

On August 23, 2024, the City Clerk received an appeal (see Attachment 4) from resident, Kimber Goddard. The reason provided states, “This is an appeal of each, and every action taken by the West Sacramento Planning Commission on August 15, 2024, re: Agenda Item #5, the Yarbough Project, the RDA, the EIR, findings re; the RDA and EIR, and Tentative Map 5224 plus resolution 24-2PC and 24-3PC”. On October 23, 2024, Mr. Goddard submitted his “Appellant’s Brief” (see Attachment 5), and on October 28, 2024, the applicant’s attorney submitted a “Response to Administrative Appeal” (see Attachment 6).

ANALYSIS
The Appeal, as well as prior and subsequent email correspondence from Mr. Goddard, contain general assertions pertaining to potential California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) impacts of the Yarbrough Project, Mr.

Goddard’s criticism of the Project’s provision of affordable housing, his opinion that the Project’s proposed golf course is not feasible, his request for a public workshop and direct mailings to City residents beyond the required legal public notice, and other general criticisms of the City Planning Commission and City staff. The analysis addresses only those aspects of the appeal that relate to CEQA compliance and approval of the VTSM. The Appeal purports to include an appeal of the Planning Commission’s recommendation contained in Resolution 24- 3PC. Since Resolution 24-3PC is a recommendation that City Council approve the ARDA rather than final action, Resolution 24-3PC is not technically appealable. However, for convenience, this report refers to the Appeal as an appeal of the “Yarbrough Project”.

Based on the appellant’s communication to staff, several of the major CEQA concerns regarding the Yarbrough Project include:
 Traffic Impacts
 Evacuation Planning
 Impacts on Water Supply and Quality
 School Impacts
 Police Services
 Golf Course Feasibility
 VMT and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
 Biological Resources
Several Non-CEQA related items include:
253
Appeal of Yarbrough VTSM Phase I
November 6, 2024

 Affordable Housing
 Demand for Public Workshop and Supplemental Mailings
On October 31, 2024, a memorandum provided by the City Attorney’s Office was prepared to address the application of the CEQA standards applicable to this project (See Attachment 7). The staff report is intended to further clarify staff’s position that the process of review of Yarbrough Phase I VTSM has been executed appropriately and that the requirements of CEQA have been met.

Phase I VTSM
The Phase I development area is bounded on the north by Bevan Road, non-project agricultural lands to the east and southeast, Burrows Avenue to the south, and undeveloped agricultural land (part of which will be future Yarbrough phases) and the Main Drain to the west. The Phase I Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (VTSM) proposes 548 “small lots” - defined as those that will be built as detached single-family residential units – and additional 70.4 acres of “large lot” parcels for a total of approximately 179 acres of the larger 713 acres Yarbrough project area. The large lot parcels consist of a variety of use types, including but not limited to: a future, relocated Fire Station #42, stormwater detention basins, landscaped parkways, small pocket parks, a 5-acre neighborhood park, and two parcels (12.73 acres) that may be the site of the Phase I affordable housing development. The VTSM includes residential, recreational, and parkland areas consistent with the uses allowed by the Yarbrough Master Plan originally approved by the City in 2008. Initial development within the Phase I area will include construction of residential neighborhoods, two lake features, and connections to adjacent arterial roadways among other improvements. Initial grading of the proposed 18-hole golf course will commence with the first phase of development, but not be completed until a subsequent phase of the project (likely Phase III).

The approval of a VTSM shall confer a vested right to proceed with development in substantial compliance with the ordinances, policies, and standards described in Section 66474.2 of the Subdivision Map Act unless as may be modified by terms of a development agreement. However, if Section 66474.2 is repealed, the approval or conditional approval of a vesting tentative map shall confer a vested right to proceed with development in substantial compliance with the ordinances, policies, and standards in effect at the time the vesting tentative map is approved or conditionally approved.

The current Zoning Map and General Plan Land Use Designations incorporate the development of Yarbrough Master Plan. While there have been small modifications to the placement of certain land uses from the original conception of the plan including parks, open space, and internal roads, the project remains generally consistent with the intended land uses. The existing zoning designations in Phase I include Residential One Family (R-1B), Residential-Medium Density (R-2), Residential Multi-Family (R-3), Public/Quasi-Public (PQP), Recreation and Parks (RP), and Public Open Space (POS).

Appeal of Map
With respect to Phase I VTSM, the Goddard Appeal does not identify any legal basis for disapproval of the Phase I VTSM based on either the City’s subdivision standards (Chapter 16.20 of the City’s Municipal Code) or the Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code § 66410 et seq.). As to the Amended and Restated Development Agreement (ARDA), the City Planning Commission’s recommendation that the City Council approve the ARDA is not a final approval, and therefore is not subject to administrative appeal. Nevertheless, the Goddard Appeal does not identify any legal basis for the City Council to disapprove the ARDA based on either the City’s Development Agreement standards (Chapter 17.43 of the City’s Municipal Code) or state law pertaining to development agreements (Gov. Code, § 65864 et seq.).

Traffic Impacts and Improvements
As noted in the City Attorney’s memo, the Goddard Appeal asserts that the City has failed to analyze the cumulative traffic impacts of past and proposed development projects in Southport. This is factually incorrect.

The Yarborough Project (Transportation Study) (Fehr & Peers 2006) assumed development of the various elements of the project, including the residential, mixed-use, commercial elements, the golf course, and the proposed elementary school. Since the Yarbrough Project received its entitlements in June of 2008, two significant traffic mitigation improvements: the South River Road Bridge (Mike McGowan Bridge) and Village Parkway Extension have been constructed. A total of 12 traffic mitigation measures have been put in place by the Yarbrough EIR.

The Yarbrough DEIR specifically evaluated cumulative impacts based on both the development projections in the Southport Framework Plan as well as four pending projects at the time: the River Park Project, the Harbor Pointe 254
Appeal of Yarbrough VTSM Phase I
November 6, 2024

Project (renamed Liberty Specific Plan), the Parks at Southport Project, and University Park Project. (DEIR, p. 5- 6—5-8; see also p. 2- 1 and Figure 2-2.) The unit count of these four projects is summarized below.

Project Unit count
identified in
EIR
Unit count
planned
today
Comment Percentage
Liberty
(formerly
“Harbor
Pointe”)
1,724 1,503 16.5%
River Park 2,788 2,284 25.2%
Parks at
Southport
2,050 0 Project
withdrawn
0%
University
Park
2,500 0 Project
withdrawn
0%
Total 9,062 3,787 41.7%
As shown by the above table, the Yarbrough EIR considered as part of its cumulative impact analysis the traffic impacts associated with the development of 9,062 new residential units among these four projects. Based on what is known today, that overstates reasonably foreseeable residential development in Southport by more than 5,275 units or approximately 58% less units are planned today than were envisioned at the time the EIR was prepared.

The Kinect Project, also referred to as Jefferson Village Apartments, is also identified in the Appeal. This project is a 322-unit multifamily residential project located at 2301-2425 Jefferson Blvd. The City reviewed the application for conformance with the zoning requirements in effect at that time, which permitted multifamily by right on this property. The City determined the Kinect Project was consistent with the use classifications and development intensity assumed in the Southport Framework Plan and 2016 General Plan. The environmental documentation associated with the 2016 General Plan assumed and evaluated the land use type and density of the Kinect Project, and the project conforms with the densities identified in the General Plan and zoning. As such, the Yarbrough EIR included the land use type and density that is part of the current Kinect Project.

Jefferson Boulevard Improvements
The original obligation in the DA included improvements that the Landowner was obligated to complete prior to the development of the 1,501st residential unit in the Southport Area beyond those identified as existing plus approved. The ARDA provides more detail on the timing and funding obligation for the Jefferson Boulevard improvements including expanding widening and improvements north to Linden Road (as opposed to Marshall Road) and accelerating the completion of construction. The amendment is summarized below:
 Jefferson Blvd. cross sections to be depicted on the First Tentative Map in Phase I with City Engineer approval. The full street improvements on Jefferson Blvd. from Linden Road to the Project (Southport Pkwy) to be built (street widening, sidewalks, bike lanes, and landscaping).  The Yarbrough project may utilize $10 million (+/-) in transportation fee credits from the first 548-unit Tentative Map towards improvement costs.
 A commitment of $2.8 million in fee credits originally from the South River Road Bridge commitment per DA to be utilized for Jefferson Blvd. improvement costs.  The initial contribution of $2.4 million (+/-) designated for the Enhanced Transit/Mobility System shall be credited to the improvements on Jefferson Boulevard in Phase I.  Jefferson Blvd. improvements to be started upon initial construction of subdivision improvements in first small lot final map in Phase I and completed at the 400th final home inspection in Phase I.

Emergency Evacuation
As noted in the City Attorney memo, the Goddard Appeal and subsequent correspondence from Mr. Goddard appear to claim that the City either lacks an emergency evacuation plan or that the City’s planning for evacuation of Southport is inadequate. According to the memo provided by Chief Binns of the Fire Department on October 18, 2024 (see Attachment 8), the City is well prepared to initiate an evacuation or partial evacuation of its residents.

From a pre-incident planning perspective, the City has always had an evacuation plan and updates the plan regularly as needed. The Police Department has the legal authority to initiate and manage an evacuation small or 255
Appeal of Yarbrough VTSM Phase I
November 6, 2024

large, but in the event the need is large-scale, the City’s Emergency Operation Center (EOC) will be activated, and the decision and organization of an evacuation will be decided and coordinated within the EOC, including input from City management and emergency services. As the City cannot have a generic route plan because each emergency presents its own specific challenges, the City creates the route plan to accommodate those challenges to best manage the flow of vehicles and people as deemed most appropriate. The City is currently working on an update to the plan that will include additional tools for the public as well as emergency responders to assist in the event of an evacuation. As the City of West Sacramento are members of the Yolo County Joint Emergency Management System (JEMS), with this update the City is working with multiple agencies and departments within Yolo County to provide a comprehensive and interoperable plan. Included with this new update will be a countywide marketing blitz that will inform the public of the updated plan and publicly accessible tools. In the meantime, and prior to the updated plan and tools being made available, the City has an evacuation map that details all the main thoroughfares throughout the City, which can be accessed here:
https://www.cityofwestsacramento.org/home/showpublisheddocument/4272/63640824150640000 It is important for the public to be aware of these routes as a specific evacuation route plan will include some if not all of the routes on the map. Note: Until its completion, the City will not assume that the Enterprise Bridge Crossing will be used as an evacuation route for residents of the City.

Impacts to Water Supply
The City has adequate water supplies to serve the Yarbrough Project according to the Water Supply Assessment (Appendix B) of the EIR. However, development levels exceeding the build out projections of the Southport Framework Plan could surpass the City’s capacity to deliver and store that water. Implementation of Mitigation Measure US-5b will require that the Yarbrough project finance its share of water trunk line extension and storage facilities which will alleviate water supply issues. Therefore, the proposed project’s contribution to cumulative demands for these services is less than cumulatively considerable.

The DEIR Chapter 3.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, comprehensively addressed the Yarbrough Project’s impacts on water supply and water quality. A Water Supply Assessment was prepared for the Project and was included in Appendix B to the EIR. “The WSA assessed the adequacy of existing and planned future water supplies to the City of West Sacramento, and the City’s ability to meet the water supply demands of the proposed Yarbrough project. Information from the WSA was used to analyze the environmental impacts on water supply resulting from the proposed project. As stated in the Hydrology and Water Quality Chapter of the EIR, impacts to water supply would be less than significant.” (FEIR, 3-59.) The network of lakes that are part of the Project design are a feature that provide added flood control and stormwater drainage (reducing the need for expensive drainage infrastructure), in addition to providing recreational functions. (DEIR, pp. ES-3, 2-3, 2-6.) The lakes are designed to provide enough floodwater storage to replace the capacity currently provided by the agricultural land on the Project site and accommodate additional runoff produced not just by proposed development, but also from other future developing areas of Southport. (DEIR, p. 2-6.)
Finally, the City’s recently approved Housing Element discussed water supplies with respect to future development in West Sacramento, explaining that the City’s drinking water is supplied by the Sacramento River, that the main treatment plant’s “capacity is sufficient to meet the demand for water in West Sacramento for the foreseeable future, including anticipated needs for future development of Southport and the specific plan areas discussed above. Most of the major subdivisions in Southport are served by the City water system.” (Housing Element, A.3- 17.)
School Impacts
Yarbrough includes the dedication of land for an elementary school site consistent with both the Southport Framework Plan and the Washington Unified School District (“WUSD”) master plan. However, construction of the school would be the responsibility of the Washington Unified School District. Section 16.2 (School Agreement) of the ARDA requires that, prior to the approval of the first small lot final map for the Project, ASB (applicant) must provide the City with evidence of a fully executed agreement with the WUSD, to the satisfaction of the School District, for the phasing and development of school facilities to serve the Project.

Additional site-specific CEQA analysis will be required when the school district finalizes future development plans for the site. The project applicant will pay the required school impact fees through the building permit process as the project is constructed. These fees are intended to offset the impacts of the project’s projected increase in school-age children. Construction of the school is expected to occur as development of the site occurs and as 256
Appeal of Yarbrough VTSM Phase I
November 6, 2024

determined necessary by the Washington Unified School District. While the anticipated amount of developer fees that would be collected from buildout of the project may not be sufficient to provide adequate school facilities with the project area, Government Code Section 65997 provides that school impacts are fully mitigated by payment of school impact fees and exercise of any or all of the financing options set out in the section. In addition, other projects in the area, specifically the River Park Project and Liberty Specific Plan, include the required designation of school sites within their project sites.

Police Services/ Public Safety
The Yarbrough Project is obligated to finance design and construction of a new fire station within the project to replace the outdated Station #42 currently located at Davis and Gregory. The applicant will fund the design for the new Fire Station #42 upon the approval of the first small lot final map in Phase I. The Landowner shall dedicate property to the City for the purpose of a planned fire station within the project, in accordance with the final Comprehensive Development Phasing Plan and Comprehensive Financing Agreement (PFFP) and the Southport Fire Response Study. The new fire station is proposed to be constructed on Parcel 8 in the Phase I VTSM. The applicant is required to provide the new fire station site with sewer, water and other utilities as a condition of approval and a provision of the Development Agreement.

The original Yarbrough Development Agreement included language that would have required relocated Fire Station #42 to include a room within the fire station that could be used by the police. The Yarbrough EIR did not require this as mitigation for any identified impact, having concluded that payment of the City’s Police Facilities Development Impact Fee mitigated potential impacts to less than significant (See DEIR, Impact US-2). The Goddard Appeal and subsequent correspondence from Mr. Goddard asserts that the ARDA “eliminate[s] police needs entirely in this agreement” let’s “the developer off the hook” with the City “receiv[ing] nothing in return.” Mr.

Goddard also demands that the City “[p]ut the police station, equipment and whatever impact fee the developer needs to pay back into the development agreement.”
The ARDA does modify the original DA by removing the requirement that the planned fire station also include space for this “police annex”. He is incorrect, however, that the City received nothing in return. The Project was, and still is, required to pay development impact fees to the City to cover necessary public service facility improvements. The ARDA also adds an additional requirement - the Developer will now be required to participate in the formation of a public safety Community Financing District (CFD), which will fund fire and police personnel, equipment, and maintenance costs. As described in a memo from Police Chief Strange (Attachment 9), Response to Modification Proposal of Yarbrough Development Agreement, this change to the ARDA is preferred by Police.

Golf Course
In addition to a network of neighborhood and pocket parks, the Master Plan includes an 18-hole golf course that will be for public use but privately owned. The golf course shall commence with Phase I of construction of the project. If the golf course is not completed prior to the issuance of the one thousand two hundredth (1200th) residential building permit, then no further residential building permit shall be issued. The term “completed” shall mean the golf course, including all infrastructure and improvements thereon, has been constructed and that the golf course is in the “grow in” or “course maturation phase. The Pro Shop shall be constructed upon completion of the golf course such that it is open to the public for use and enjoyment at the same time that the golf course is open to the public for use. There has been no indication from the applicant the intent to remove the golf course as part of this Project. Assertions in the Goddard Appeal that the golf course will never be built and that instead, more housing will be constructed, as pure speculation. As noted in the City Attorney memo, pure speculation is not substantial evidence. The General Plan and Zoning designations applicable to the portion of the Project shown as golf course do not allow residential development, which means that any effort to build housing on that property would trigger a need for General Plan and Zoning changes. Such a change would be wholly within the City’s discretion and would require an entirely separate environmental analysis under CEQA.

VMT and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The Yarbrough EIR evaluated impacts associated with Project with regard to GHG and climate change, including impacts associated with Project VMT (Vehicle Miles Traveled). As explained in Chapter 3.3 of the Yarbrough DEIR, the Yarbrough Project “has several components that will promote the use of alternative modes of transportation that reduce [VMT], produce less GHG emissions than vehicular travel, or avoid such emissions,” including: (1) an overall design and land use plan that “encourages walking and biking and shortens auto trips for routine shopping,” (2) a “compact core that encourages public transit use by increasing the intensive of commercial and residential development in the core,” (3) an improvement in “the regional balance of housing and jobs” encouraging “fewer 257
Appeal of Yarbrough VTSM Phase I
November 6, 2024

long-distance commutes, thus reducing VMT,” and (4) being “located in an area that has been designated in [the Sacramento Area Council of Governments’] preferred growth alternative” which was “specifically modeled to reduce the increase in VMTs.” (Yarbrough DEIR, pp. 3.3-39—40.) The Goddard Appeal does not identify any new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts in the context of air quality or GHGs that would be potentially associated with the City’s approval of the Phase I VTSM, nor does it identify any new or substantially different, feasible mitigation measures or alternatives that would substantially reduce significant environmental impacts with respect to the Project’s air quality or GHG impacts. As a result, there is no trigger for supplemental environmental review of the Project under CEQA.

Biological Resources
In his Appellant’s Brief, Mr. Goddard claims that the “retention of the Main Drain introduces new risks of stormwater contamination, which were not addressed in the EIR.” He also argues that “the project threatens the habitats of the giant garter snake and Swainson’s hawk, both of which are protected species” and alleges “[u]pdated mitigation plans are required” under the Yolo Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (“Yolo HCP/NCCP”). The approved Project included removal/filling of the existing Main Drain, which the Yarbrough EIR identified as a potential water of the United States. (Yarbrough EIR, pp. 2-6, 3.4-18; FEIR, p 2-2.) As depicted in the Phase I VTSM, the Main Drain now is proposed to remain and be connected to the Project’s proposed lake system. Very minor reconfigurations of the lake system are incorporated into the Phase I VTSM to accommodate retention of the Main Drain. In February 2022, the City issued a letter finding that the Project is consistent with the Yolo HCP/NCCP and that the amount and type of take proposed with implementation of Phase 1A of the Project is authorized through the Yolo HCP/NCCP. Since certification of the Yarbrough EIR, the applicant has made additional progress in obtaining resource agency approvals for the Project.

Affordable Housing
The Goddard Appeal and subsequent correspondence from Mr. Goddard criticizes the Project’s inclusion of affordable housing units and the timing of affordable housing development, stating Mr. Goddard’s desire for fewer (or no) affordable units. As noted in the City Attorney’s memo, these criticisms do not identify any legal deficiency with respect to CEQA, nor any legal deficiency with respect to the City’s required findings on the Phase I VTSM or the City’s approval of the ARDA. The Yarbrough Project approvals require the Project to provide affordable housing in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code. Consistent with the requirements of Chapter 15.40 of the City’s Municipal Code, the Project must provide at least 10 percent of the units (304 units) as affordable units to low-income households, as required under the original DA. (West Sac. Mun. Code, § 15.40.060(A)(2).) The only change in the ARDA with respect to the affordable units relates to timing of their construction by Project phase, but the total number of affordable units does not change. Under the ARDA, the Project would be required to include 120 affordable units in Phase I (double the Phase I obligation under the City’s ordinance). (ARDA, Exhibit F, Affordable Housing Agreement, § 2.) In addition, the applicant is required to construct an additional 84 units in Phase I in compliance with its obligations for the Bridgeway Lakes II project, resulting in a total of 204 affordable rental units in Phase I. (Id. at § 3.). For more information on affordable housing related to Yarbrough, please see Attachment 10 (EDH Memo on Affordable Housing).

Public Workshop and Public Outreach
The Goddard Appeal demanded that the City hold a “public workshop” regarding the Project to give the general public more opportunity to learn and engage on the Yarbrough Project. The Goddard Appeal does not, however, claim that any of the City’s notices or public process are legally deficient.

In preparation for the City Council’s November 6 public hearings, the City has provided the following:
 Radius Mailing to residents within 500 feet of the project boundaries (mailed on October 11th);  Posted Notice in the News Ledger on October 11th and October 25th;  Social Media Postings describing the Project and link to the City’s project page;  Updated Yarbrough Project Page to include the Goddard Appeal Required Findings and Analysis for a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map In accordance with Section 16.20.040 of the Municipal Code, a tentative map may be approved or conditionally approved by the planning commission if it finds that:

A. The tentative map is consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan and any applicable specific plans;
258
Appeal of Yarbrough VTSM Phase I
November 6, 2024

Analysis: This project is being approved as a vesting tentative subdivision map (VTSM). As conditioned, the proposed 548-lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (VTSM) is consistent with the City’s General Plan. There is no Specific Plan applicable to the Yarbrough Project. However, the current DA states that Bevan Road and Burrows Avenue should be built to rural road standards. The current Mobility Element of the City’s General Plan indicates that Bevan Road and Burrows Avenue should be built as collector roads, in order to appropriately accommodate the projected traffic and mobility needs of the Yarbrough and greater Southport area. The timing of construction of Bevan and Burrows is identified in the Development Agreement, but prior to ultimate buildout, Bevan will be resurfaced from Jefferson to the easternmost portion of the subdivision, and provided as a local through road to Gregory Avenue and an emergency vehicle access to the northernmost portion of Phase I. The General Plan also categorizes Gregory Avenue as a collector road at ultimate buildout.

As part of the proposed “front door” of the Yarbrough Project, the developer will construct an extension of Southport Parkway (known as “Village Parkway”) from Jefferson Boulevard east to the intersection of “A” Street (the North/South minor arterial through the Phase I subdivision) at the first phase of construction. This will allow a main point of access to the Phase I subdivision and is consistent with the Mobility Element of the General Plan.

Rural road standards mandate a two-lane road with a gravel shoulder, which is not compatible with higher traffic volumes and alternative modes of mobility (e.g., pedestrians, bicycles, scooters). Collectors generally carry light to moderate traffic volumes on two lanes, and vehicular speed limits are typically maintained in the 25 to 35 miles per hour range. Bicycles are accommodated by a bike lane a minimum of five feet in width, preferably with a physical buffer, separating bicyclists from adjacent vehicle traffic. For pedestrian connectivity, sidewalks are provided on both sides of the street. The DA is being amended to comply with the standards of the current General Plan.

Based on the above discussion, Finding A can be met in the affirmative.

B. The tentative map is in conformance with this title (Title 16 Subdivisions) and the zoning ordinance; and
Analysis: The proposed Phase I VTSM is consistent with Title 16 of the Municipal Code, as conditioned. Adequate service capacity remains available to service the project area.

Title 16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code outlines the requirements and standards for subdivisions. The analysis is meant to ensure that the tentative map complies with the following aspects:
 General Provisions: As conditioned, the proposed VTSM complies with the intent and purpose of Title 16, which includes promoting public health, safety, and general welfare.  Design Standards: The design of the subdivision (lot sizes, shapes, and arrangement) adheres to the standards set forth in Title 16.
 Street Layout: The proposed street layout, including width, alignment, and access, meets the standard specifications of the City.
 Utilities and Infrastructure: The proposed utilities, drainage, and backbone infrastructure are, as conditioned, consistent with the City’s standard specifications  Public Services: As conditioned, the VTSM and accompanying Project-level Development Agreement provide for adequate public services.

Based on the above discussion, Finding B can be met in the affirmative.

C. The tentative map is in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act.

Analysis: Based on staff’s review of the submitted VTSM, it meets the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act as conditioned. Based on the above, Finding C can be made in the affirmative.

General Plan Consistency
Both the VTSM and DA amendments are consistent with Land Use (LU) Goal LU-3.11 in the City of West Sacramento’s General Plan 2035, Southport Development, which is guided by the following principles:
259
Appeal of Yarbrough VTSM Phase I
November 6, 2024

 Concentrate community commercial, high-density residential and public facilities uses in nodes along major and minor arterials.
 The Yarbrough project strategically positions medium-density residential units along key transportation corridors, such as the provision of the affordable housing site along Jefferson Boulevard, just south of the relocated Fire Station #42. This enhances accessibility and supports the efficient use of infrastructure.

The project’s focus on a mix of uses ensures that public facilities are easily accessible to residents, promoting a vibrant and integrated community hub.
 Emphasize a mixture of residential types and densities, while concentrating on homeownership as a general goal.
 The project includes a diverse range of residential options, from a range in densities of single-family homes to medium-density multi-family developments. This variety caters to different demographics, including families, young professionals, and seniors. However, most Yarbrough products are ownership singlefamily residential units. By promoting homeownership, the Yarbrough project aims to foster a sense of stability and investment in the community. The mixture of housing types also helps in creating an inclusive community that accommodates a wide range of income levels and lifestyles.  Ensure that ample buffers are established between incompatible land uses.  The project design includes thoughtful planning of buffer zones to mitigate potential conflicts between different land uses, such as the buffers planned along the Bevan Road frontage that would provide a greater distance between the medium-density Yarbrough area from the rural residential areas to the north of the project. In addition, residential neighborhoods enjoy green spaces and landscaped buffers, ensuring that the quality of life for residents is not compromised by noise or traffic from transportation corridors.

These buffers also contribute to the aesthetic appeal of the community and provide recreational opportunities for residents.

Environmental Considerations
The Yarbough Project, including amendments to the General Plan and Southport Framework Plan, a rezone, and the original Development Agreement, was approved by the City Council in June 2008, which included certification of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to satisfy requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). An EIR was prepared by the City of West Sacramento, as lead agency, pursuant to CEQA (Public Resources Code 21000 et seq.); the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations 15000 et seq.), as amended; and the City’s environmental thresholds of significance. CEQA requires that all state and local government agencies consider the environmental consequences of projects over which they have discretionary authority. Approval of the proposed project, general plan amendment, and rezoning constitutes a project under CEQA. The project includes the Development Agreement as well as the Tentative Subdivision Maps which are being considered in the action tonight.

The document is intended to be both a program and project EIR, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15161 and 15168. For the requested actions on the VTSM and DA amendments, the Commission made findings pursuant to CEQA that the previously certified EIR remains adequate given that the project remains substantially unchanged from its original approval. If the Planning Commission’s action approving the VTSM on August 15 is upheld, the Council will be confirming its concurrence.

The potential environmental impacts that would result from implementation of the proposed project are summarized in the EIR. In many cases, impacts are less than significant. To the extent feasible, the City has incorporated mitigation measures into the proposed project to avoid or reduce impacts. Those impacts that cannot be mitigated to a less-than-significant level would remain significant and unavoidable. The mitigation measures can be found in the Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures, Yarbrough General Plan Amendment and Rezoning Project, Table ES-1.

For any new environmental review to be necessary, the City must have substantial evidence of new or more severe environmental effects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Given that the project has remained substantially the same to date, and as explained in the City Attorney’s memo, no additional environmental review is required.
260
Appeal of Yarbrough VTSM Phase I
November 6, 2024

It should be noted that the landowner has completed agricultural land mitigation and biological mitigation through the Yolo Habitat Conservancy. All other applicable mitigation measures remain in place from the EIR.

Commission Recommendations
On August 15, 2024, the Planning Commission held a continued public hearing for the Phase I Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (VTSM) and the Development Agreement amendments. Following a public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to adopt Resolution 24-2PC (Approval of the Phase I VTSM) and Resolution 24- 3PC, thereby recommending the City Council approve Ordinance 24-11 detailing the amendments to the DA subject to the conditions and findings.

Strategic Plan Integration
The recommended item supports the Council’s 2022 Strategic Plan Policy Agenda Goal of the Southport Framework Plan Refinement as the Framework Plan was developed to provide “…an overall vision and guide for Southport as it develops.” This project would contribute to providing more housing variety, amenities to the area, and mixed-use opportunities as well as sustainable efforts associated with the master plan.

Alternatives
The City Council’s primary alternatives are summarized below.

1. Conduct the public hearing and reject the Goddard Appeal, thereby upholding the Planning Commission’s August 15 actions and adopting Resolution 24-119.

2. Uphold the Goddard Appeal for one or more of the following reasons:
a. Find that the required findings for approval of the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map cannot be made for specific reasons articulated by the Council and deny the requested VTSM. b. Find that the CEQA analysis is not the appropriate level of environmental review and direct staff to perform additional environmental analysis (specify impacts to be addressed) prior to City Council’s consideration of the request.

3. Continue the item to a future date and request that additional information be provided at that time.

Alternative 1 is staff’s recommendation. While staff believes the analysis presented in this report is correct, staff is prepared to effectuate Alternative 2 or any of the options presented by staff at the Council’s direction. If Council selects alternative 2, Staff would return to Council at a subsequent meeting with a resolution that implements this Alternative. Staff is prepared to implement Alternative 3 at the Council’s direction.

Coordination and Review
This report was written and reviewed in coordination with the Planning, Development Engineering and Transportation and Mobility Divisions of the Community Development Department, Finance Department, Fire Department, Parks and Recreation Department, and the City Attorney’s office.

Budget/Cost Impact
The applicant is paying for staff’s review of the project through a reimbursement agreement.

ATTACHMENTS
1) Resolution 24-2PC - Findings and Conditions of Approval 2) Yarbrough Vicinity Map
3) Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5224
4) Appeal filed on August 23, 2024
5) Appellant Brief received on 10.23.24
6) Cox Castle Response to Appellant Brief
7) City Attorney’s Memorandum on the Goddard Appeal
8) PD Memo on Modification Proposal of Yarbrough DA
9) Fire Memo on Emergency Evacuation
10) EDH Memo on Affordable Housing
11) Flood Protection Memo
12) City Council Resolution on Appeal
261
RESOLUTION 24-2PC

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION

OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 5224
WHEREAS, on July 18, 2024, the West Sacramento Planning Commission opened a public hearing on the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted to continue the public hearing to the next regular meeting on August 1, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted to open the public hearing and take public comments on the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted to continue the public hearing to the next regular meeting on August 15, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Phase I Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (VTSM) includes approximately 153 acres of the larger 713 acres Yarbrough project area; and WHEREAS, the initial development within the Phase I area will include the creation of 548 lots comprising residential neighborhoods, two lake features, and connections to adjacent arterial roadways among other improvements; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5224 consistent with the goals, policies, and implementation programs of the City of West Sacramento General Plan and Subdivision Map Act, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has duly considered all information before them; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission:

Approve the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5224, substantially in the form as attached to the staff report, via Resolution 24-2PC as recommended by the Planning Commission.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of West Sacramento this 15th of August 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: Squires, Sablan, Olivares, Delgado, Jackson, Linker, Wong NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Matthew Delgado, Planning Commission
Chairperson
Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 262
ATTEST:

David W. Tilley, Secretary
Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 263

FINDINGS
Required Findings and Analysis for a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map In accordance with Section 16.20.040 of the Municipal Code, a tentative map may be approved or conditionally approved by the planning commission if it finds that:

A. The tentative map is consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan and any applicable specific plans;
Analysis: This project is being approved as a vesting tentative subdivision map (VTSM).

As conditioned, the proposed 548-lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (VTSM) is consistent with the City’s General Plan. There is no Specific Plan applicable to the Yarbrough Project. However, the current DA states that Bevan Road and Burrows Avenue should be built to rural road standards. The current Mobility Element of the City’s General Plan indicates that Bevan Road and Burrows Avenue should be built as collector roads, in order to appropriately accommodate the projected traffic and mobility needs of the Yarbrough and greater Southport area. The timing of construction of Bevan Road and Burrows Avenue is identified in the Development Agreement, but prior to ultimate buildout, Bevan Road will be resurfaced from Jefferson Blvd. to the easternmost portion of the subdivision, and provided as a local through road to Gregory Avenue and an emergency vehicle access to the northernmost portion of Phase I. The General Plan also categorizes Gregory Avenue as a collector road at ultimate buildout.

As part of the proposed “front door” of the Yarbrough Project, the developer will construct an extension of Southport Parkway (known as “Village Parkway”) from Jefferson Boulevard east to the intersection of “A” Street (the North/South minor arterial through the Phase I subdivision) at the first phase of construction. This will allow a main point of access to the Phase I subdivision and is consistent with the Mobility Element of the General Plan.

Rural road standards mandate a two-lane road with a gravel shoulder, which is not compatible with higher traffic volumes and alternative modes of mobility (e.g., pedestrians, bicycles, scooters). Collectors generally carry light to moderate traffic volumes on two lanes, and vehicular speed limits are typically maintained in the 25 to 35 miles per hour range. Bicycles are accommodated by a bike lane a minimum of five feet in width, preferably with a physical buffer, separating bicyclists from adjacent vehicle traffic. For pedestrian connectivity, sidewalks are provided on both sides of the street.

The DA is being amended to comply with the standards of the current General Plan Based on the above discussion, Finding A can be met in the affirmative.

B. The tentative map is in conformance with this title (Title 16 Subdivisions) and the zoning ordinance; and
Analysis: The proposed Phase I VTSM is consistent with Title 16 of the Municipal Code, as conditioned. Adequate service capacity remains available to service the project area.

Title 16 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code outlines the requirements and standards for subdivisions. The analysis is meant to ensure that the tentative map complies with the following aspects:

Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 264
• General Provisions: As conditioned, the proposed VTSM complies with the intent and purpose of Title 16, which includes promoting public health, safety, and general welfare.
• Design Standards: The design of the subdivision (lot sizes, shapes, and arrangement) adheres to the standards set forth in Title 16. • Street Layout: The proposed street layout, including width, alignment, and access, meets the standard specifications of the City.
• Utilities and Infrastructure: The proposed utilities, drainage, and backbone infrastructure are, as conditioned, consistent with the City’s standard specifications
• Public Services: As conditioned, the VTSM and accompanying Project-level Development Agreement provide for adequate public services.

Based on the above discussion, Finding B can be met in the affirmative.

C. The tentative map is in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act.

Analysis: Based on staff’s review of the submitted VTSM, it meets the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act as conditioned.

Based on the above, Finding C can be made in the affirmative.

Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 265
Exhibit A

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
Community Development Department
Subject: Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5224 Yarbrough Master Plan Tentative Map Phase I
The Planning Division has reviewed the Vesting Tentative Map application for the subject project and recommends the following conditions of approval:

Note: In the event the Development Agreement expires before this map, these requirements shall continue to remain in force as a condition of this map.

Standard Planning Conditions:
1) The specific map approved by this action is identified as the Yarbrough Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5224 located in the southwest portion of Southport, prepared by CBG Engineering dated July 19, 2024, for the creation of 548 residential lots and additional 70.4 acres of “large lot” parcels. All notes and conditions shown on the Map are hereby included in this approval.
2) Prior to approval of the first small lot final map, the project shall ensure substantial compliance and conformance with the standards and land uses set forth in the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Southport Framework Plan for the City. 3) Subdivider shall hold harmless the City, its council members, officers, agents, employees, and representatives from liability for any award, damages, costs, and fees incurred by the City and/or awarded to any plaintiff in any action challenging the validity of this permit or any environmental or other documentation related to approval of this permit. Subdivider further agrees to provide a defense for the City in any such action. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any such action and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 4) The subdivider shall comply with requirements of all agencies of jurisdiction including the City of West Sacramento.
5) This approval will expire in 36 months from the date of Tentative Map approval by the Planning Commission unless it is extended pursuant to the State Subdivision Map Act. 6) The subdivider shall pay all applicable City and County fees and charges at the rate and amount in effect at the time such fees and charges become due and payable. 7) Prior to approval of building permits, the applicant shall provide comprehensive building plans, elevations, and architectural treatments to the City for review and approval by the Planning Division. City review will ensure project consistency with the Southport Design Guidelines and Architectural Handbook and the Yarbrough Master Design Guidelines. Prior to construction of any units, applicant shall submit a project plan showing the actual footprints of the residences.
8) A fencing plan for community theme walls and fencing for individual lots shall be submitted to the Community Development Department with subdivision improvement plans prior to the issuance of building permits. No chain link fences shall be used, except for along the drainage channels as approved by the City. The design of fencing and walls shall comply with the Southport Design Guidelines and the specified village theme. The theme wall shall be compatible with the existing theme wall in the area.

Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 266
VTSM Yarbrough Phase 1
2 9) Prior to issuance of grading or other site development permit including ground-disturbing activities, the developer shall implement procedures for inventory and evaluation of archaeological resources and for identified cultural resources (including archaeologic sites, tribal cultural resources, and traditional cultural properties, and cultural landscapes), and implement feasible avoidance or treatment measures. 10) If human remains are encountered during earth-disturbing activities for the project, all work within 100 feet of the find shall stop immediately and the West Sacramento Police Department, the Community Development Department, and Yolo County Coroner’s office shall be notified. If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission will be notified and, in turn, will notify the person determined to be the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). The MLD will provide recommendations for treatment of the remains (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5; Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5; Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94 and 5097.98). 11) If adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, unique archaeology, or other cultural resources occurs, developer shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission who will contact the affected Native American tribe for consultation regarding mitigation contained in Public Resources Code section 21084.3(a) and (b) and CEQA Guidelines section 15370.
12) Prior to issuance of grading or other site development permit including ground-disturbing activities, project applicant shall develop standard operating procedures, points of contact, and timelines and schedules for the project so that all possible damages can be avoided, or alternatives and cumulative impacts properly assessed. 13) Under no circumstances shall building permits be issued for any lot created by the recording of any final map until adequate capacity in public facilities and infrastructure, as determined by the City Engineer, exists to serve the proposed development. 14) Landscape, irrigation, and lighting plans for CFD or HOA areas shall be approved by the Community Development Department prior to approval of the final map. 15) The future name of the new streets shall comply with the City’s street naming and addressing policy.
16) The project shall not be gated (an option for gating exists if an active adult community is sited in the project, per city approval)
Project Specific Conditions:

Note: In the event the Development Agreement expires before this map, these requirements shall continue to remain in force as a condition for this map. 17) According to Development Agreement Section 10.3.3 (Additional Design Guidelines), Landowner shall have additional design guidelines, identified in Exhibit E of the Development Agreement, reviewed and approved by the City’s Planning Commission, in the exercise of its discretion. The additional design guidelines shall be approved by the Planning Commission, based on the timing set forth in Exhibit E before the corresponding map or permit is issued to Landowner. These include (add timing for each guideline):
a) Golf Course Guidelines (Timing: prior to approval of Phase II, including the improvement of the golf course); Open Space Guidelines (Timing: open space guidelines shall be finalized prior to approval of the first small lot final map); b) Master Sign Program (Timing: prior to or concurrent with the approval of first small lot Final Map);
Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 267
VTSM Yarbrough Phase 1
3 c) Master Fence Program (Timing: prior to or concurrent with the approval of first small lot final map for the project);
d) Condominiums (Timing: prior to or concurrent with an application for a subdivision map, creating condominiums);
e) Lake and Waterway Management Plan (Timing: prior to or concurrent with the approval of first small lot final map);
f) Signage (Timing: prior to the approval of the first site improvement permit or first small lot final map for the project, whichever occurs first); and g) Levee Construction Restriction (Timing: prior to or concurrent with the approval of each tentative map);
18) Prior to or concurrent with the approval of the first tentative map for the Project, Landowner shall submit an Affordable Housing Agreement term sheet to the satisfaction of the City in accordance with Exhibit F of the Development Agreement. Prior to or concurrent with the approval of the first small lot final map for the Project, Landowner shall enter into the Affordable Housing Agreement for Phase I for the initial 204 units which includes 84 units previously transferred from Bridgeway Lakes to the satisfaction of the City. 19) According to Development Agreement Section 12.2.9 (Comprehensive Recreational Phasing and Financing Plan), Prior to issuance of the first small lot final map for the project, Landowner shall identify the substantive terms of the Comprehensive Recreational Phasing, Financing, and Reimbursement Plan. Community Development staff will engage the Finance Department on the specifics of the financing plan employing methodologies developed with other large Southport residential projects. 20) According to Development Agreement Section 13.1 (Lakes and Waterways), Lakes and waterways developed as part of the Project shall be privately owned by the Landowner.

Landowner shall maintain and operate the lakes and waterways in accordance with Exhibit E of the Development Agreement and to the satisfaction of Reclamation District 900, its successors, or assigns. Upon approval of the first small lot final map for the Project that identifies and creates the lakes and waterways as a separate parcel of land, Landowner shall grant the City an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (the “IOD”) to the said parcel. 21) According to Development Agreement Section 14.2 (Financing), the substantive terms of the Comprehensive Financing Agreement shall be identified and generally accepted by City staff, prior to the approval of the first small lot final map for the Project. Prior to approval of the first final map for the Project, Landowner and City shall enter into an agreement defining with specificity Landowner’s obligations in connection with the financing and construction of certain infrastructure improvements in the City (the Comprehensive Financing Agreement).
22) According to Development Agreement Section 15.2 (Construction Easements), prior to the approval of the first final map for the Project, Landowner shall grant to the City, without compensation or credits, temporary construction easements along the deep-water ship channel, as required by the Army Corps of Engineers, Reclamation District 900, and/or the West Sacramento Flood Control Agency, for levee improvements within the Property.

Landowner agrees that areas designated by those agencies shall be no build areas until such time that the levee improvements are constructed and completed. Note: This is not applicable to the Phase I Tentative Map.

Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 268
VTSM Yarbrough Phase 1
4 23) According to Development Agreement Section 16.1 (Fire), Landowner shall dedicate property to the City for the purpose of a planned fire station (relocated Station # 42) in accordance with the Comprehensive Development Phasing Plan and Comprehensive Financing Agreement and the Southport Fire Response Study. The timing of construction shall be as identified in the Comprehensive Phasing Agreement prior to the approval of the first small lot final map for the project (Identified as Parcel 7 of the Tentative Map). The Yarbrough project will commit to the funding of the design of Fire Station #42 (up to a maximum amount equal to the total sum of the fire fee per unit per the existing fee program for 548 residential lots) in accordance with the terms of the Development Agreement Exhibit H.
24) According to Development Agreement Section 16.2 (School Agreement), Landowner shall enter into an agreement with the Washington Unified School District, to the satisfaction of the School District, for the phasing and development of school facilities to serve the Project. Prior to the approval of the first small lot final map for the Project, Landowner shall provide the City with evidence of the fully executed agreement. 25) According to Development Agreement Section 16.3 (Enhanced Transit/Mobility System), The Comprehensive Development Phasing Plan and Comprehensive Financing Plan shall require Landowner to participate in a mechanism to finance capital costs for an enhanced transit system and to participate in a financing mechanism for annual operating costs.

Landowner’s contribution to capital costs estimated at two million four hundred thirteen thousand dollars ($2,413,000) which is to be applied to the construction cost of Jefferson Boulevard in Phase I in accordance with Development Agreement (Exhibit J).

Landowner’s contribution to operating costs is estimated at eight hundred fifty-one thousand dollars ($851,000). This annual contribution will commence at the formation of the project Community Facilities District (CFD). These financing mechanisms shall include the Project and any other projects as bound between Jefferson Blvd., the Sacramento River, and the barge canal for an enhanced Southport-wide transit/mobility system upon City’s ultimate adoption of such mobility system.
26) According to Development Agreement Section 16.4 (Traffic Reduction Plan), Landowner shall devise a traffic reduction plan for the project. To be completed to the satisfaction of City Staff at the approval of the first small lot final map for the Project. 27) According to Development Agreement Section 16.5 (Evacuation and Emergency Management Plan), Landowner shall pay its proportional share of an update to the City’s Evacuation and Emergency Management Plan (16.5.1). Landowner shall deposit the funds with the City within 35-days of the effective date, or the date the City determines Landowner's shall pay a pro-rata share per residential unit of any City projects encumbered by a development agreement or as calculated by a nexus study, whichever occurs later.
28) According to Development Agreement Section 19 (Service District for Maintenance), to be completed to the satisfaction of City Staff at the approval of the first small lot final map for the Project.
29) Landowner agrees to participate in the formation of and enter into a city wide “Public Safety” financing mechanism prior to the approval of the first small lot final map for the project.

Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 269
VTSM Yarbrough Phase 1
5 30) According to Development Agreement Section 20 (Homeowners Association), Landowner shall cause to be established a Homeowners Association or other non-City entity, to the satisfaction of the City, to own and maintain such Improvements within the Project as are designated by the City with each small lot final map, and in accordance with the Comprehensive Financing Agreement. (City and Owner to review and define what HOA requirements are applicable). If the owner chooses to establish an HOA, owner will prepare document consistent with California Department of Real Estate (California Civil Code section 4000). The City will review HOA agreement and CC&Rs to assure perpetual maintenance and service responsibilities are clearly identified. 31) According to Exhibit E of the Development Agreement, Landowner shall identify and agrees to prepare and implement a Master Sign Program for residential subdivisions and future development advertising, including off-site signs prior to approval of first small lot final map.
32) According to Exhibit E of the Development Agreement, Landowner shall identify and agrees to prepare and implement a Master Fence Program prior to or concurrent with the approval of the first small lot final map.
33) According to Exhibit E of the Development Agreement, Landowner shall need design review approval of condominiums prior to or concurrent with an application for a subdivision map, creating condominium lots.
34) According to Exhibit E of the Development Agreement, Landowner shall prepare and implement a lake and waterway management plan prior to the approval of the first grading permit or small lot final map for the project.
35) According to Exhibit E of the Development Agreement, Landowner shall prepare and implement signage along the lake and water system and pumping facility to define proper and improper usage and to minimize the potential for the introduction of exotic fish, prior to the approval of the first site improvement permit or final map for the Project, whichever occurs first.
36) The Landowner shall construct the widening and improvements of Jefferson Blvd from Linden Road to the Project concurrent with the Project development:
a. Jefferson Blvd. cross sections to be depicted on the First Tentative Map in Phase I with City Engineer approval. The cross sections shall contain the full street improvements on Jefferson Blvd. from Linden Road to the project to be built (street widening, culverts, sidewalks, bike lanes, and landscaping area). b. The Yarbrough project may utilize $10 million (+/-) in Transportation Fee Credits from first 548-unit Tentative Map towards improvement costs. c. The initial contribution of $2.4 million (+/-) designated for the Enhanced Transit/Mobility System shall be credited to the improvements on Jefferson Boulevard in Phase I.
d. The $2.8 million construction commitment from the original Development Agreement to construct the South River Road Bridge will be transferred for Jefferson Improvement costs. This commitment will be eligible for fee credits. e. The initial contribution of $2.4 million (+/-) designated for the Enhanced Transit/Mobility System shall be transferred to the improvements on Jefferson Boulevard in Phase I.
f. A reimbursement agreement to be finalized with the City prior to approval of the first small lot final map in Phase I. The term for reimbursement to Yarbrough Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 270
VTSM Yarbrough Phase 1
6 from the City to be 2 years, or at recording of the first final map in Yarbrough Phase 2, (west side of Jefferson), whichever occurs first. g. Jefferson Improvements to be started upon initial construction of subdivision improvements in first small lot Final Map in Phase 1 and accepted by the City Council prior to the 400th final residential unit inspection in Phase 1. h. All Transportation Fee Credits to be available with approval of first approved small lot final map in Phase I.
i. If total Jefferson cost exceeds $20 million, the improvement cross section will be phased, as necessary per City Engineer, to cap cost at $20 million. A construction contract for the remainder of the full Jefferson improvements to be executed at the approval of the subdivision improvements for the first small lot Final Map in Phase II. The City and developer will work on establishing alternative measures to complete Jefferson Boulevard improvements in case there is a gap in funding that exceeds the $20 million
j. There may be portions of Jefferson Blvd construction that require environmental or agency permitting based on surveys to be conducted. City to pursue any necessary environmental permitting. Landowner to pay for the cost of the application and consultant to obtain this environmental permitting.

Portions requiring such permitting shall be constructed upon receipt of all the environmental permits.
37) As a condition of approval of any tentative map within the project or as described in an approved development agreement, the proponent shall contribute their fair share (shall pay a pro-rata share per residential unit of any city projects encumbered by a development agreement or as calculated by a TIF nexus study) of the cost of installing a traffic signal at the Jefferson Boulevard/Davis Road intersection and reconstructing the intersection so that the NB approach has a left-turn lane and a through/right-turn lane and the SB approach has a left-turn lane, through lane, and a through/right-turn lane. (Note: Projected in Future Phase, need at the development of 1,000 units within the project).(MM TRF 10).
38) As a condition of approval of any tentative map within the project or as described in an approved development agreement, the proponent shall contribute their fair share (shall pay a pro-rata share per residential unit of any city projects encumbered by a development agreement or as calculated by a TIF nexus study) of the cost of installing a traffic signal at the Jefferson Boulevard/Bevan Road intersection and reconstructing the intersection so that the NB approach has a left-turn lane, through lane, and a through/right-turn lane and the SB approach has a left-turn lane, through lane and a through/right-turn lane. (Projected in Future Phase, per the DA obligation at 1,000 building permits).(MM TRF 11).
39) As a condition of approval on the first tentative map approved within the project, the applicant shall be required to install a traffic signal at the Jefferson Boulevard/Southport Parkway intersection and reconstruct the intersection so that the NB approach has a leftturn lane, through lane, and a through/right turn lane; the SB approach has a left-turn lane, through lane, and a right-turn lane; and the EB approach has a left-turn lane and through/right-turn lane. Per DA, this obligation is at the 500th permit.(MM TRF 12).

The Engineering Division has reviewed the Tentative Map application for the subject project and recommends the following conditions of approval:

Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 271
VTSM Yarbrough Phase 1
7 Engineering General Conditions:
40) The final map shall be prepared in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and local Ordinances.
41) A current title report (completed within 30 days of final map submittal) shall be submitted with the final map. The title report shall include the entire legal boundary of the property being subdivided.
42) Closure calculations shall be provided at the time of final map check submittal. All calculated points within the map shall be based upon one common set of coordinates.

All lot acreages shall be shown on the map. The points of beginning shall be clearly defined. All information shown on the map shall be directly verified with information shown on the closure calculation printout.
43) Easements of record no longer required to serve this subdivision shall be abandoned prior to or concurrent with the first phased final map. 44) The developer shall comply with the City’s digital mapping ordinance. 45) A right-of-way dedication or improvement shown on the map that is not consistent with requirements contained in the City Standard Specifications or the Southport Design Guidelines shall not be deemed approved by approval of the tentative map unless specifically allowed as a condition of approval of said tentative map. 46) The developer shall pay all applicable City fees and charges at the rate and amount in effect at the time such fees and charges become due and payable unless indicated otherwise in these vesting tentative map conditions or a development agreement. 47) Under no circumstances shall building permits be issued for any lot created by the recording of any final map until adequate capacity in public facilities and infrastructure, as determined by the City Engineer, exists to serve the proposed development. 48) The design and construction of all public improvements shall conform to the City of West Sacramento Standard Specifications and Details, the Southport Design Guidelines and all other applicable ordinances and requirements, unless otherwise defined in these conditions.
49) If the subdivision improvements are not constructed prior to consideration of the final map by City Council, the developer shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City in compliance with the City Subdivision Ordinance. 50) Existing public and private facilities damaged during the course of construction shall be repaired by the developer, at his sole expense, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 51) Prior to approval of the first and subsequent final maps, the developer shall pay the City their share, as determined by the City Engineer, of the reasonable, actual cost of any civil improvements constructed by others, which improvements benefit the property in question and would have been, or were, required as a condition of said final map, provided those improvements are not otherwise reimbursable by Regional Impact Fees.

The City will forward said funds to the persons who advanced the funds for said improvements.

Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 272
VTSM Yarbrough Phase 1
8 52) Prior to City acceptance of subdivision improvements, the Developer shall pay the City his share, as determined by the City Engineer, of the reasonable, actual cost of land acquisition for common public improvements paid for by other Developers, if any, which acquisition, benefits this map and would have been, or was, required as a condition of said final map, provided those acquisition costs are not otherwise reimbursable by Regional Impact Fees. The City will forward said funds to the persons who advanced the funds for said acquisition.
53) Provide Sewer and Water Master Plan, to address the following: Project-level hydraulic model to determine pipe sizing to ensure adequacy to serve the entire Yarbrough project area prior to approval of first small lot final map.
54) Utility sizes have not been reviewed or approved at this time. Final sizing and depths of all utilities shall be reviewed by the City Engineer during the plan check process and shall be revised at the direction of the City Engineer. 55) Where sufficient capacity exists, or where the City has sufficient funds to finance additional capacity and agrees to construct it in time to serve the proposed development, the developer shall pay all applicable impact fees at the time of building permit issuance.

This applies to regional water, sewer, storm drain, parks, and traffic circulation improvements. Developer will also pay facility fees at the time of building permit issuance.
a. Furthermore, the developer may substitute some form of land-secured public debt financing for a portion of these impact fees at a level acceptable to the buyers of the development’s product. This shall be accomplished prior to making application for building permits. Per the City’s reimbursement policy for regional improvements, appropriate credit for impact fees shall be granted to the developer at the time of building permit issuance for the construction of any onsite or off-site regional improvements secured in this fashion. 56) Where insufficient capacity exists, and/or where the City does not have sufficient funds to finance additional capacity or will not construct it in time to serve the proposed development, the developer shall finance and construct the improvement(s). Per the City’s reimbursement policy for regional improvements, where this situation occurs, the City will enter into a reimbursement agreement with the developer for costs incurred above their fair share as follows:
a. For improvements covered by impact fees, the fair share is determined by the amount of the impact fees. The source of reimbursement shall be impact fees and/or substituted public debt financing from the proposed development and other parties involved in public debt financing and paying impact fees for the same improvement(s).
b. For other improvements and infrastructure, the fair share is determined by calculating the proposed development’s prorated share of the capacity of the required facility. The source of reimbursement shall be from the development of properties benefiting from the oversizing of capacity, or from excess fees and public debt financing as determined by the City’s Finance Department.

Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 273
VTSM Yarbrough Phase 1
9 57) Landowner anticipates implementing traffic control measures on Bevan Road during construction. The Project will initially resurface and improve Bevan Road to the requirements of the Fire Department from Jefferson Blvd to the eastern most project property line and take access to its first phase from Southport Parkway/Village Parkway. Initially, Bevan Road will only be used as an EVA (Emergency Vehicle Access) to access the project. Gates preventing non-emergency vehicle access to and from Bevan Road shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief or their designee and installed prior to issuance of the first building permit. The City will pursue and obtain all necessary environmental permitting and rights of way to allow the construction of Bevan Road to the full Collector Road Standard. Landowner shall provide for the design of Bevan Road as a full Collector Road prior to recordation of the first small lot final map. The Landowner will agree to begin the construction of the upgraded Bevan Road to the full Collector Standard within 120 days of all environmental and city permitting and right of way being obtained or by the 350th building permit of Phase I, whichever occurs later. Landowner to pay for the cost of the application and consultant to obtain the permit Such measures will be implemented after review and approval of City Staff. The upgrading of improvements to Bevan Road to Collector Road Standard will qualify for traffic fee credits. 58) Landowner anticipates implementing traffic control measures on Burrows Avenue during construction. Such measures will be implemented after review and approval of City Staff. Burrows Road initially will be constructed to the Rural Road standard. The city will pursue any environmental permitting necessary and obtain any right of way necessary to construct Burrows Road to its ultimate Collector Road Standard. The developer will agree to begin the construction of Burrows Road to that Collector Road Standard within 36 months of the completion of the City obtaining any necessary additional right of way, and having obtained all required environmental and City permitting, or at the time that the first building permit is pulled in Phase III of the Project, whichever occurs later. Landowner to pay for the cost of the application and consultant to obtain the permit. The upgrading of improvements to Burrows to Collector Road status will qualify for traffic fee credits. All Transportation Impact Fee Credits to be available with approval of first small lot final map in Phase 1.

Grading
59) A grading permit shall be obtained for the construction of the subdivision in accordance with the City’s Grading Ordinance.
60) A grading, geotechnical, and erosion and sediment control plan shall be included as part of the improvement plans. Plans shall show any effect on adjacent properties and mitigation to avoid or correct adverse off-site effects. No blockage of existing drainage shall be allowed.
61) A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared for the project and submitted to the State as required. The developer shall submit a copy of the SWPPP to the City for review with the grading plans.
62) Submission of soils and geotechnical reports shall be required as a condition of the improvement plan approval. The expansive nature of the soils as well as the probability of high groundwater tables shall be evaluated in the soils report and all recommendations followed. If high groundwater is expected or encountered, the soils report shall provide for design solutions to mitigate the impacts to future improvements including public streets, building slabs and drainage facilities.

Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 274
VTSM Yarbrough Phase 1
10 63) Grading shall be performed in accordance with a grading plan prepared by the developer’s civil engineer and approved by the City Engineer. All grading shall be performed in one continuous operation (i.e. per final map area). The grading plan shall be included in the subdivision improvement plans.
64) In addition to grading information, the grading plan shall indicate all existing trees, and trees to be removed as a result of the proposed development. An arborist report may be required at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Department and the City Engineer.

The developer shall obtain any necessary tree removal permits prior to improvement plan or grading plan approval, as applicable.
65) The City Engineer shall determine the need for dewatering prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. All dewatering shall comply with Section 22 of the City Standard Specifications.
66) Reasonable measures shall be implemented, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, to minimize any nuisance from dust and noise during grading and construction operations. 67) The project must comply with the current State Construction General Permit for stormwater quality treatment.

Streets and Roadways
68) The design and construction of all roadway improvements shall conform to the City of West Sacramento Standard Specifications and all other applicable laws, codes and regulations unless otherwise defined in these conditions. 69) Phasing of improvements in this subdivision shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer.
70) The developer shall dedicate 12.5’ public service/public utility easements on both sides of all public rights-of-way within the subdivision in compliance with City standard requirements. Such public easements may be omitted or reduced in width along certain roadways with written approval from all affected utility companies and the City Engineer. 71) All lots which abut a theme or sound wall shall include a minimum 5’ wall maintenance easement adjacent to the wall for City wall maintenance purposes. 72) All numbered lots which abut a collector or arterial shall include a ‘No Ingress/Egress’ line along those frontages.
73) Secondary emergency access shall be provided for all phases of development to the satisfaction of the City Fire Department and the City Engineer. Temporary emergency access shall be provided on dead-end roads caused by project phasing which exceed 600 feet in length. Turnarounds shall be constructed per City Standards on all dead-end roads.
74) All off-site public right-of-way or easements providing for access and/or public improvements to the project shall be recorded as necessary for all phased final maps.

Off-site improvements shall be constructed per City Standard Specifications.

Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 275
VTSM Yarbrough Phase 1
11 75) As part of the improvements for the Phase I final map, the developer shall construct Southport Parkway through the subdivision. With an overall width of 106’, the design shall include a 16’ median, a 12’ travel lane and 8’ bike lane in each direction, a 12’ multi-use trail on the west side and 6’ sidewalk on the east side as generally shown on the tentative map. The landscaping behind the sidewalk may be deferred on Southport Parkway from Jefferson Boulevard to the Main Drain crossing. 76) The cross section for interior subdivision streets shall include monolithic curb and gutter with a 5’ wide sidewalk to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 2010.

The landscape strip typically provided may be eliminated in favor of trees within the front setback of the lots, outside of the public utility easement/public service easement (PUE/PSE). Alternatively, trees may be located with the PUE/PSE with written approval from the utility companies and the City Engineer.
77) The developer shall provide one driveway for each residential lot, designed and constructed per the City Standard Specifications and Details unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Such driveways, not including transitions, shall not be located closer than two feet to the adjacent property lines unless the property fronts on a cul-desac, in which case the driveway may be constructed up to the property line. 78) The developer must provide at least one parking space, a minimum of 21’ in length, measured along the face of curb for all lots within the subdivision. The parking spaces shall not encroach within any driveway, including driveway transitions. 79) Curb ramps shall be constructed per City Standard Specifications and Details at all intersections within and along the periphery of the subdivision. 80) Street lighting shall be designed and constructed per City Standard Specifications and Details except that light standards must be LED. The proposed street light system shall include improvements which make it “small cell ready” to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Streetlight and photometric plans shall be submitted to the City for review and approval with the subdivision improvement plans.
81) All proposed dry utilities shall be placed underground. Overhead to underground conversion within the subdivision boundary or along improved roads shall be completed prior to City acceptance of the subdivision improvements. Utilities to be undergrounded shall include telephone, gas, electric and cable/fiber. Cable easements outside of the planned public service/utility easements shall be dedicated to the City. Easements for all other utilities outside of the planned public service/utility easements shall be dedicated to the appropriate provider. The undergrounding of utilities on Burrows Avenue shall be deferred until the approval of the Burrows Avenue construction (to be requested for approval by the Planning Commission).
82) Joint trench utility plans shall be submitted to the City for review and comment with the subdivision improvement plans and shall include extra conduits for future fiber to the City Engineer’s satisfaction. Such additional conduits shall be dedicated to the City for future use.

Storm Drainage/Stormwater
Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 276
VTSM Yarbrough Phase 1
12 83) All proposed public storm drainage improvements, including connection(s) to the existing public storm drain system, shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City Standard Specifications and Details, the City’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit requirements, California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) guidelines and the City’s Storm Drain/Storm Water Master Plan (SD/SW MP) as part of the subdivision improvements for each phase. 84) All drainage infrastructure improvements shall be consistent with the SD/SW MP or an acceptable alternative as approved by the City Engineer, and MS4 requirements.

Submittal of detailed drainage calculations for all proposed drainage infrastructure will be required. Final sizing of storm pipes and culverts and the proposed drainage infrastructure shall be determined prior to approval of the improvement plans. Method of calculation to be used shall be established by the SD/SW MP and the City Standard Specifications.
85) The grading plan for the site shall be accompanied by a shed map that defines that area tributary to this site and all drainage facilities shall be designed to accommodate the tributary flow. The grading plan shall include and define the 100-year overland flow path. 86) To the extent practical, all stormwater runoff, including roof drains, shall be collected on site and treated with Best Management Practices (BMPs) per California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) guidelines. All storm water shall be routed to the nearest existing storm drain system.
87) All runoff from the project shall be routed through the appropriate proposed Lake 1A, Lake 1B detention facility per the project’s Drainage Report. Construction of Southport Parkway and high-density residential north of said road will require construction of Lake 2C as well.
88) All storm drainage pipe material shall meet current City standards. 89) Public easements shall be provided for all public storm drainage facilities located on private property.

Sanitary Sewer
90) All proposed sewer improvements, including the connection to the existing public system, shall be shown on the improvement plans and constructed as part of the subdivision improvements. All sewer system improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City Standard Specifications and Details, and the City’s Sewer Master Plan. All sewer collection, conveyance and treatment improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
91) Prior to the approval of the improvement plans, the Developer shall submit sanitary sewer calculations to the City Engineer to prove the adequacy, size, and location of all proposed sewer mains. The Developer shall construct any on-site or off-site sanitary sewer facilities as required to adequately serve the subdivision per the City’s Sewer Master Plan including all approved Tech Memos, and the City Standard Specifications and Details, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 92) Development of any phase of the project shall not occur until the wastewater collection facilities necessary to serve the site are provided.

Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 277
VTSM Yarbrough Phase 1
13 93) Connection to the City sewer system is required at the time of development. Each individual lot shall have a separate sewer connection designed and constructed in accordance with the City Standard Specifications and Details. 94) Connection to Regional San’s Lower Northwest Interceptor is required prior to acceptance of infrastructure improvements tied to first final map. Developer/engineer is responsible for Regional San approvals.
95) Public easements shall be provided for public sewer facilities located on private property.

Water
96) All water system improvements, including the connection to the existing public system, shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Standard Specifications and the City’s Water Master Plan including all approved Tech Memos, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Deviations from the Water Master Plan may be analyzed for impacts within the City water model prior to approval. 97) The developer shall dedicate any necessary land for major water distribution, transmission, storage, and pumping facilities as required by the City’s Water Master Plan (may be eligible for fee credits).
98) Prior to the approval of the improvement plans, the Developer shall submit a water model analysis and any other data to the City Engineer sufficient to prove the adequacy, size, and location of all proposed water mains, and to evaluate the need for additional storage facilities. The Developer shall construct any on-site or off-site master planned improvements found necessary by the water model analysis to supply the subdivision with an adequate water system.
99) Water service to the subdivision shall be provided with the first phase of development via a looped distribution system. On-site dead-end mains, either permanent, or temporary due to project phasing, shall not exceed 600 feet. 100) Connection to the City water system is required at the time of site development. Each individual lot shall have a separate domestic water connection designed and constructed in accordance with the City Standard Specifications and Details. 101) A separate irrigation water connection shall be provided to landscape lots. 102) Public easements shall be provided for all public water mains that cross through private property.
103) Fire hydrant locations shall be subject to approval by the City Fire Marshal and the City Engineer. All fire hydrants shall be located in a public service easement or public utility easement.

Landscaping and Irrigation
104) Landscape and irrigation plans shall be designed to complement and enhance drainage requirements and be submitted for City review and approval as part of the improvement plan set.

Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 278
VTSM Yarbrough Phase 1
14 105) All landscape and irrigation design and construction shall comply with the City’s Landscape Development Guidelines, City Standard Specifications and Details, the City’s Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance and Parks and Recreation Department standards.
106) A separate metered electrical connection shall be designed and constructed for each new irrigation controller.
107) Landscaping and irrigation for pedestrian paths shall be designed and constructed as part of the subdivision. At the City’s discretion, the developer may pay an in-lieu fee for the value of the design and construction of all or a portion of the improvements. In that case, the in-lieu fee, or the combination of the in-lieu fee and improvements, will be considered compliance with this condition.
108) The project frontage of each phased final map along Jefferson Boulevard shall be improved with landscaping, irrigation and trees.
109) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, or the final map being scheduled for approval by City Council, whichever comes first, the developer shall submit an arborist report which fulfills the requirements of the City of West Sacramento’s Tree Preservation Ordinance (City Municipal Code section 8.24.100). The report must be prepared and signed by an arborist licensed by the State of California. Recommendations from the arborist report must be included within the grading and improvement plans to the extent reasonably possible. If construction that could impact protected trees has not commenced within one year of the date of the arborist report, the report must be updated prior to issuance of any permit. Any protected trees damaged or removed due to project construction shall be replaced in the manner(s) set forth in the Municipal Code.

Docusign Envelope ID: 33C59163-4823-4276-9222-BCDCAEADCF4B 279
Figure 2-2
Project Vicinity
05279.05 Initial Study Admin Draft (6-05)
Project Area
1,000 1,000 3,000
feet
0 2,000 4,000
Scale = 1:24,000
Base Map: USGS 7.5' series Sacramento West, California
quadrangle (1967; PR 1980)
Excluded
from
Project Area
City Limits
LEGEND

BRIDGEWAY LAKES
AND

BRIDGEWAY LAKES II

UNIVERSITY PARK

RIVER PARK

OTHER DEVELOPMENTS
HARBORPOINTE
280

JEFFERSON BOULEVARD

DEEP SHIP WATER CHANNEL

SOUTHPORT

PARKWAY

BURROWS AVENUE BEVAN ROAD

OTIS AVENUE

COLLINS STREET LEWISTON ROAD SILVERWOOD ROAD SQUAW ROAD SQUAW SILVERWOOD ROAD PYRAMID PL PERRIS CT TOPAZ ROAD

ARROWHEAD STREETHAVASU ST

COURT SOUTHERLAND ROAD

PROSSER STREET

TURLOCK STREET

TULE STREET WALKER ROAD MILLERTON PL BEVAN ROAD

TAHOE STREET

SHAVER CT BOSTON RD NEW YORK ROAD PLYMOUTH ROAD

DOVER STREET

LIVERPOOL STREET

SOUTHAMPTON ST
GREGORY AVENUE G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-01.DWG 0 400 800 1,200 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 115 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP COVER SHEET SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 400' DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2023 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 SITE VICINITY MAP SCALE: PROJECT SITE 1" = 400' INDEX OF SHEETS: 123457869101112131415 COVER SHEET BOUNDARY SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS & EASEMENTS (NORTH) EXISTING CONDITIONS & EASEMENTS (SOUTH) PHASE 1A - LARGE LOT MAP PARCEL SUMMARY (NORTH) PARCEL SUMMARY (SOUTH) INDEX SHEET VESTING TENTATIVE MAP - NORTH VESTING TENTATIVE MAP - SOUTH CIRCULATION MAP SANITARY SEWER & WATER (NORTH) SANITARY SEWER & WATER (SOUTH) STORM DRAIN & GRADING STUDY (NORTH) STORM DRAIN & GRADING STUDY (SOUTH) GENERAL NOTES ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL ONE PARCEL TWO PARCEL THREE PARCEL FOUR PARCEL FIVE PARCEL SIX PARCEL SEVEN PARCEL EIGHT PARCEL NINE PARCEL TEN” PARCEL ELEVEN PARCEL TWELVE PARCEL THIRTEEN PARCEL FOURTEEN PARCEL FIFTEEN PARCEL SIXTEEN PARCEL SEVENTEEN PARCEL EIGHTEEN PARCEL NINETEEN PARCEL TWENTY PARCEL TWENTY-ONE PARCEL TWENTY-TWO PARCEL TWENTY-THREE PARCEL TWENTY-FOUR A PARCEL TWENTY-FOUR B PARCEL TWENTY-FOUR C PARCEL TWENTY-FOUR D PARCEL TWENTY-FIVE PARCEL TWENTY-SIX PARCEL TWENTY-SEVEN PARCEL TWENTY-EIGHT BASIS OF BEARINGS: LEGEND BENCHMARK: REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 281

OTIS AVENUE HENSHAW

COLLINS STREET

EAGLE STREET

JENNINGS

COURT LEWISTON ROAD SILVERWOOD ROAD SQUAW SQUAW SILVERWOOD ROAD PYRAMID PLACE PERRIS COURT TOPAZ ROAD

ARROWHEAD STREET

HUNTINGTON ROAD HENSHAW ROAD HAVASU STREET

BIG BEAR STREET
COURT
COURT

ROLLINS ROAD MARTIS STREET SAN VICENTE ROADSOUTHERLAND ROAD

PROSSER STREET

OTAY STREET

TURLOCK STREET

TULE STREET WALKER ROAD MILLERTON PLACE FOWLER ROAD BEVAN ROAD

TAHOE STREET
COURT

SHAVER ROAD BURROWS AVENUE BEVAN ROAD JEFFERSON BOULEVARD

JEFFERSON BOULEVARD

ARMFIELD

AVENUE FISHER AVENUE SOUTHPORT PARKWAY

DOVER STREET

LIVERPOOL STREET

SOUTHAMPTON STREET

PROSSER STREET NEW YORK ROAD BOSTON ROAD PLYMOUTH ROAD
DEEP SHIP WATER CHANNEL G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-02.DWG 0 300 600 900 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 215 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP BOUNDARY SHEET SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 300' DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2023 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 SCALE: BOUNDARY MAP 1" = 300' LEGEND REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 282 APN: 045-200-10APN: 045-230-02 PORTION: APN: 045-230-03 APN: 045-230-15 APN: 045-190-09 APN: 046-190-08 APN: 045-190-01 APN: 045-230-16 APN: 045-230-08 APN: 045-230-07 APN: 045-230-04, 05, 06 APN: 045-200-11; 045-270-18 APN: 045-270-18 APN: 045-230-12 PORTION APN: 046-190-02 PORTION APN: 046-190-02 APN: 046-180-006, 007; 046-190-003 APN: 046-190-04 APN: 045-230-13 PORTION APN: 045-230-14 DRILL SITE APN: 045-230-04, 05, 06 APN: 045-230-18; 045-240-04 APN: 045-230-17; 045-240-05, 06 G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-03-04.DWG 0 200 400 600 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 315 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS & EASEMENTS (NORTH) SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 200' DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2023 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 SEE SHEET 4 REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 283 APN: 045-230-18; 045-240-04 APN: 045-230-17; 045-240-05, 06 APN: 045-230-15 APN: 045-190-09 APN: 045-190-10 APN: 045-190-06 APN: 046-200-01, 04, 08 APN: 046-210-01 APN: 046-200-10
APN: 046-200-11
APN: 046-200-12
APN: 046-200-13 APN: 046-190-08 APN: 046-190-04 APN: 046-210-02 PORTION APN: 045-230-14 APN: 045-230-18; 045-240-04 APN: 045-230-17; 045-240-05, 06 G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-03-04.DWG 0 200 400 600 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 415 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS & EASEMENTS (SOUTH) SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 200' DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2023 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 SEE SHEET 3 REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 284

NOT A PART NOT A PART NOT A PART

DEEP SHIP WATER CHANNEL

BURROWS AVENUE BEVAN ROAD

OTIS AVENUE

COLLINS STREET LEWISTON ROAD SILVERWOOD ROAD SQUAW ROAD SQUAW SILVERWOOD ROAD PYRAMID PLACE PERRIS COURT TOPAZ ROAD

ARROWHEAD STREET HAVASU STREET
COURT

MARTIS SOUTHERLAND ROAD

PROSSER STREET

OTAY STREET

TURLOCK STREET

TULE STREET WALKER ROAD MILLERTON PLACE BEVAN ROAD

TAHOE STREET
COURT
SHAVER

JEFFERSON BOULEVARD

DOVER STREET

LIVERPOOL STREET

SOUTHAMPTON STREET
PROSSER STREET NEW YORK ROAD BOSTON ROAD PLYMOUTH ROAD PARCEL 2 PARCEL 4 PARCEL 3 PARCEL 1 PARCEL 5 SOUTHPORT PARKWAY PARCEL 6 VILLAGE PARKWAY GREGORY AVENUE PARCEL 7 PARCEL 8 PARCEL 9 PARCEL 10PARCEL 11 G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-05.DWG 0 300 600 900 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 515 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP PHASE 1A - LARGE LOT MAP SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 300' DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2023 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 LARGE LOT SUMMARY PARCEL GROSS AREA (AC) USE REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 285

NOT A PART NOT A PART NOT A PART

BURROWS AVENUE BEVAN ROAD

JEFFERSON BOULEVARD

OTIS AVENUE SQUAW ROAD
SQUAW
PERRIS
COURT
COURT

TURLOCK STREET

TULE STREET WALKER ROAD BEVAN ROAD

TAHOE STREET
COURT
SHAVER

DOVER STREET

LIVERPOOL STREET

SOUTHAMPTON STREET

PROSSER STREET NEW YORK ROAD BOSTON ROAD PLYMOUTH ROAD

PARCEL H

PARCEL F
PARCEL G PARCEL I PARCEL J PARCEL C PARCEL B PARCEL E PARCEL D PARCEL A PARCEL A PARCEL R (PARCEL 11 - LLM) PARCEL O (PARCEL 8 - LLM) PARCEL Q (PARCEL 10 - LLM) PARCEL 7 PARCEL K PARCEL L PARCEL M PARCEL 5 PARCEL 3

VILLAGE PARKWAY

GREGORY AVENUE
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 13 141516171819202122232425 2627 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 122 123 151 150 149 148 124125126127128129130131132 101 133 115 116 119 117 121 105 104 103 100 99 98 97 969594 93 110 109108107106 112 113 134 83 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 73 81 82 142 141143144 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 44 45 46 47 48 43 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 102 147 146 145 152 153 154 155 156 157 158159 163 162 161 160 165 166 167 164 168 169 170 171 172 174175176177178179180181 182 183184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210 211212 213 214 215 216217218219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 232 231 230 229 270269 268265 266 267 262 263 264 261 260 259 258257256255 254 253 252 251250 247 248 249 246 244 245 241 242 243 237 240 239 238 234 235 236 233 135136137138139140 56 57 58 120 118 111 114 173 532 531 530 534 533 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 529 528 527 526 525 521 522 523 524 515 514 513 512 516 517 518 519 520 502 501 500 499 391 390 389 388 387 386 385 384 383 382 381 380 379 378 377 376 375 374 373 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 280 279 281 282 283 284 285 287 286 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295296 297 298299 300 301 302 303304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 349348 346 345 344 343 342 341340 339 338 337 336 335 334 333 332 331 330 329 328 327 326 511 510 509 508 507 506 505 504 503 496 497 498 440 438 439 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 476 475 477 441 436 437 442 443 434 435 445 444 432 433 447 446 430 431 448 429 463 449 415 462 416 461 417 460 418 459 419 458 420 457 421 456 422 455 423 454 424 453 425 452 426 427 451 450 428 474 473 314 313 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 347 372 371 370 392 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 365 366 367 352 351350 364 400 399 398 397 396 395 394 393 472 471 470 469 468 467 466 465 464 414 413 412 411410 409 408 407 406 405 404 403 402 401 368 369 545 546 547 548 SOUTHPORT PARKWAY

A STREET

B STREET

C STREET E ROAD F ROAD

D STREET G ROAD

C STREET H COURT I ROAD

J STREET

A STREET

A STREET

K STREET L ROAD

M COURT

O STREET

O STREET P ROAD Q ROAD R ROAD

S STREET S STREET T ROAD U ROAD

V STREET

V STREET

V COURT

X COURT

Y COURT

L ROAD U ROAD

B STREET

C STREET

O STREET
N ROAD W COURT PARCEL N BURROWS AVENUE PARCEL P (PARCEL 9 - LLM) G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-06.DWG 0 200 400 600 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 615 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP INDEX SHEET SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 200' DATE:OCTOBER 13, 2023 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 SCALE: INDEX SHEET 1" = 200' SHEET 8, 10, 13, & 15 SHEET 7, 9, 12, & 14 REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 LEGEND LIMITS OF PHASE 1 SHEET INDEX 286

BEVAN ROAD BEVAN ROAD JEFFERSON BOULEVARD

SOUTHAMPTON STREET
PROSSER STREET PLYMOUTH ROAD (45'X80' LOTS) (50'X90' LOTS) (45'X70' LOTS) (50'X80' LOTS)

PARCEL H

PARCEL F
PARCEL G PARCEL I PARCEL J PARCEL C PARCEL E PARCEL D PARCEL A (45'X100' LOTS) PARCEL O PARCEL Q PARCEL 7 PARCEL 2 PARCEL K PARCEL 5 PARCEL R PARCEL L PARCEL 7 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 174175176177178179180181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211212 213 214215 216 217 218219220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 232 231 230 229 270 269 268 265 266 267 262 263 264 261 260 259 258 257 256255 254 253 252251250 247 248 249 246 244 245 241 242 243 237 240 239 238 234 235 236 233 173 532 531 530 534 533 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 529 528 527 526 525 521 522 523 524 515 514 513 512 516 517 518 519 520 502 501 500 499 391 390 389 388 387 386 385 384 383 382 381 380 379 378 377 376 375 374 373 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 349 348 346 345 344 343 342 341 340 339 338 337 336 335 334 333 332 331 330 329 328 327 326 511 510 509 508 507 506 505 504 503 496 497 498 440 438 439 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 478 476 475 477 441 436 437 442 443 434 435 445 444 432 433 447 446 430 431 448 429 463 449 415 462 416 461 417 460 418 459 419 458 420 457 421 456 422 455 423 454 424 453 425 452 426 427 451 450 428 474 473 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 347 372 371 370 392 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 365 366 367 352 353 351 350 364 400 399 398 397 396 395 394 393 472 471 470 469 468 467 466 465 464 414 413 412 411 410 409 408 407 406 405 404 403 402 401 368 369 545 546 547 548 SOUTHPORT PARKWAY I ROAD J STREET A STREET

A STREET

K STREET L ROAD

M COURT

O STREET

O STREET P ROAD Q ROAD R ROAD

S STREET S STREET T ROAD U ROAD

V STREET

V STREET

V COURT

X COURT

Y COURT

L ROAD U ROAD O STREET

N ROAD W COURT
GREGORY AVENUE PARCEL P G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-07-08.DWG 0 100 200 300 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 715 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP PARCEL SUMMARY (NORTH) SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 100' DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2023 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 PRODUCT SUMMARY PRODUCT SIZE # OF LOTS LOTS #S TOTAL 548 - MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 8 REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 LEGEND NEIGHBORHOOD LIMITS (TO DELINEATE LOT SIZES) LIMITS OF PHASE 1 PARCEL SUMMARY PARCEL ACRES USE TOTAL 70.40 - 287 NOT A PART NOT A PARTNOT A PART BURROWS AVENUE (50'X100' LOTS) PARCEL BPARCEL A PARCEL R PARCEL L PARCEL M PARCEL 3 PARCEL N (45'X100' LOTS) PARCEL 7 JEFFERSON BOULEVARD 122 123 151 150 149 148 124 125 126 127 128 129 130131132 101 133 115 116 117 119 121 105 104 103 100 99 98 97 969594 93 110109108 107 106 112 113 134 83 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 73 81 82 142 141 143144 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 102 147 146 145 152 153 154 155 156 157 158159 163 162 161 160 165 166 167 164 168 169 170 171 172 135136137138139140 56 57 58 120 118 111 114 A STREET

B STREET

C STREET E ROAD F ROAD

D STREET G ROAD
C STREET H COURT B STREET C STREET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415161718192021222324252627 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 BURROWS AVENUE G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-07-08.DWG 0 100 200 300 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 815 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP PARCEL SUMMARY (SOUTH) SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 100' DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2023 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 7 PRODUCT SUMMARY PRODUCT SIZE # OF LOTS LOTS #S TOTAL 548 - REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 PARCEL SUMMARY PARCEL ACRES USE TOTAL 70.40 - LEGEND NEIGHBORHOOD LIMITS (TO DELINEATE LOT SIZES) LIMITS OF PHASE 1 288

BEVAN ROAD JEFFERSON BOULEVARD BEVAN ROAD

LIVERPOOL STR

SOUTHAMPTON STREET

PROSSER STREET PLYMOUTH ROAD

PARCEL H

PARCEL F
PARCEL G PARCEL I PARCEL J PARCEL C PARCEL E PARCEL D PARCEL A PARCEL R PARCEL O PARCEL Q PARCEL 7 PARCEL K PARCEL 5 PARCEL 2 SOUTHPORT PARKWAY

C STREET I ROAD J STREET

A STREET

A STREET

K STREET L ROAD

M COURT

O STREET

O STREET P ROAD Q ROAD R ROAD

S STREET S STREET T ROAD U ROAD

V STREET

V STREET

V COURT

X COURT

Y COURT

L ROAD U ROAD O STREET
N ROAD W COURT 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 174175176177178179180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209210 211212 213 214 215 216 217 218219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 232 231 230 229 270 269 268 265 266 267 262 263 264 261 260 259 258257 256255 254 253 252 251250 247 248 249 246 244 245 241 242 243 237 240 239 238 234 235 236 233 173 532 531 530 534 533 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 529 528 527 526 525 521 522 523 524 515 514 513 512 516 517 518 519 520 502 501 500 499 391 390 389 388 387 386 385 384 383 382 381 380 379 378 377 376 375 374 373 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 280 279 281 282 283 284 285 286 287288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 349 348 346 345 344 343 342 341 340 339 338 337 336 335 334 333 332 331 330 329 328 327 326 511 510 509 508 507 506 505 504 503 496 497 498 440 438 439 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 479 480 478 476 475 477 441 436 437 442 443 434 435 445 444 432 433 447 446 430 431 448 429 463 449 415 462 416 461 417 460 418 459 419 458 420 457 421 456 422 455 423 454 424 453 425 452 426 427 451 450 428 474 473 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 347 372 371 370 392 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 365 366 367 352 353 351 350 364 400 399 398 397 396 395 394 393 472 471 470 469 468 467 466 465 464 414 413 412 411 410 409 408 407 406 405 404 403 402 401 368 369 545 546 547 548 GREGORY AVENUE PARCEL P JEFFERSON BOULEVARD PARCEL L G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-09.DWG 0 100 200 300 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 915 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP NORTH SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 100' DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2023 MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 10 LOT SUMMARY (165-548) NOTE: PUE ADJACENT TO ALL RIGHT-OF-WAYS TO BE 12.5' MINIMUM OR MATCH FRONT YARD SETBACKS REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 289 NOT A PART NOT A PART NOT A PART BURROWS AVENUE PARCEL BPARCEL A PARCEL R PARCEL L PARCEL M PARCEL 3 PARCEL N JEFFERSON BOULEVARD A STREET

B STREET

C STREET E ROAD F ROAD

D STREET G ROAD
C STREET H COURT B STREET C STREET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1516171819 2021222324252627 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 122 123 151 150 149 148 124 125 126 127 128 129130131132 101 133 115 116 117 119 121 105 104 103 100 99 98 97 969594 93 110109108107 106 112 113 134 83 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 73 81 82 142 141 143144 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 44 45 46 47 48 43 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 102 147 146 145 152 153 154 155 156 157 158159 160 163 162 161 165 166 167 164 168 169 170 171 172 135136137138139140 56 57 58 120 118 111 114 BURROWS AVENUE G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-10.DWG 0 100 200 300 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 1015 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP SOUTH SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 100' DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2023 MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 9 LOT SUMMARY (1-164) NOTE: PUE ADJACENT TO ALL RIGHT-OF-WAYS TO BE 12.5' MINIMUM OR MATCH FRONT YARD SETBACKS REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 290

OTIS AVENUE SQUAW ROADCOURT

TURLOCK STREET

TULE STREET WALKER ROAD BEVAN ROAD

TAHOE STREET

SHAVER NOT A PART NOT A PART NOT A PART BURROWS AVENUE BEVAN ROAD JEFFERSON BOULEVARD

PARCEL H

PARCEL F
PARCEL G PARCEL I PARCEL J PARCEL C PARCEL B PARCEL E PARCEL D PARCEL A PARCEL A PARCEL RPARCEL O PARCEL Q PARCEL 7 PARCEL K PARCEL L PARCEL M PARCEL 5 PARCEL 3 C C C C C C DD D D D D D D DD D D DD D D C C DD FF E2E2 PARCEL N PARCEL 6 PARCEL 4 PARCEL 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13141516171819 20212223242526 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 122 123 151 150 149 148 124125126127128129130 131132 101 133 115 116 119 117 121 105 104 103 100 99 98 97 969594 93 110 109108107106 112 113 134 8384 85 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 75 76 77 78 79 80 7473 81 82 142 141143144 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 44 45 46 47 48 43 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 102 147 146 145 152 153 154 155 156 157 158159 163 162 161 160 165 166 167 164 168 169 170 171 172 174175176177178179180181 182 183184 185 186 187 188189 190 191192193194195196197 198199200201202203204205206207208209210 211212 213 214 215 216217218219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 232 231 230 229 270269 268265 266 267 262 263 264 261 260 259 258257256255 254 253 252 251250 247 248 249 246 244 245 241 242 243 237 240 239 238 234 235 236 233 135136137138139140 56 57 58 120 118 111 114 173 532 531 530 534 533 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 529 528 527 526 525 521 522 523 524 515 514 513 512 516 517 518 519 520 502 501 500 499 391 390 389 388 387 386 385 384 383 382 381 380 379 378 377 376 375 374 373 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 287 286 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295296 297 298299 300 301 302 303304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 349348 346 345 344 343 342 341340 339 338 337 336 335 334 333 332 331 330 329 328 327 326 511 510 509 508 507 506 505 504 503 496 497 498 440 439 438 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 482 483 479 480 481 478 476 475 477 441 437 436 442 443 434 435 445 444 432 433 447 446 430 431 448 429 463 449 415 462 416 461 417 460 418 459 419 458 420 457 421 456 422 455 423 454 424 453 425 452 426 427 451 450 428 474 473 314 313 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 347 372 371 370 392 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 365 366 367 352 351350 364 400 399 398397 396395 394 393 472 471 470 469 468 467 466 465 464 414 413 412 411410 409 408 407 406 405 404 403 402 401 368 369 545 546 547 548 SOUTHPORT PARKWAY A STREET

B STREET

C STREET E ROAD F ROAD

D STREET G ROAD

C STREET H COURT I ROAD J STREET

A STREET

A STREET

K STREET L ROAD

M COURT

O STREET

O STREET P ROAD Q ROAD R ROAD

S STREET S STREET T ROAD U ROAD

V STREET

V STREET

V COURT

X COURT

Y COURT
L ROAD U ROAD B STREET C STREET O STREET N ROAD W COURT F F BURROWS AVENUE A1 A1 E3E3

GREGORY AVENUE

GREGORY AVENUE
SOUTH RIVER ROAD/GREGORY AVENUE PARCEL P A2 A2 GG B2 B2 B1B1 B3B3 E1E1 G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-11.DWG 0 200 400 600 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 1115 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP CIRCULATION MAP SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 200' DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2023 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 SCALE: CIRCULATION MAP 1" = 200' SECTION C - 'A' STREET 61.5' R/W SECTION D - RESIDENTIAL LOCAL STREET 56' R/W SECTION B1 - SOUTHPORT PARKWAY 106' R/W SECTION F - BURROWS AVENUE (PHASE 1) C SECTION A1 - ON-SITE JEFFERESON BOULEVARD 100' R/W C SECTION A2 - OFF-SITE JEFFERESON BOULEVARD 100' R/W SECTION G - EXISTING BURROWS AVENUE NOTE: NOT A PART OF PHASE 1. LEAVE EXISTING BURROWS AVENUE AS IS REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 SECTION B2 - SOUTHPORT PARKWAY 106' R/W SECTION B3 - SOUTHPORT PARKWAY BRIDGE OVER MAIN DRAIN SECTION F - BURROWS AVENUE (ULTIMATE - FUTURE) SECTION E1- BEVAN ROAD (PHASE 1) SECTION E2- BEVAN ROAD (PHASE 1) SECTION E3- BEVAN ROAD (PHASE 1) 291

BEVAN ROAD BEVAN ROAD JEFFERSON BOULEVARD

LIVERPOOL STREET

SOUTHAMPTON STREET

PROSSER STREET PLYMOUTH ROAD

PARCEL H

PARCEL F
PARCEL G PARCEL I PARCEL J PARCEL C PARCEL E PARCEL D PARCEL A PARCEL R PARCEL O PARCEL Q PARCEL 7 PARCEL K PARCEL 5 EXISTING LARGO PUMP STATION 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 174175176177178179180181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211212 213 214215 216 217 218219220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 232 231 230 229 270 269 268 265 266 267 262 263 264 261 260 259 258 257 256255 254 253 252251250 247 248 249 246 244 245 241 242 243 237 240 239 238 234 235 236 233 173 532 531 530 534 533 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 529 528 527 526 525 521 522 523 524 515 514 513 512 516 517 518 519 520 502 501 500 499 391 390 389 388 387 386 385 384 383 382 381 380 379 378 377 376 375 374 373 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 349 348 346 345 344 343 342 341 340 339 338 337 336 335 334 333 332 331 330 329 328 327 326 511 510 509 508 507 506 505 504 503 496 497 498 440 438 439 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 478 476 475 477 441 436 437 442 443 434 435 445 444 432 433 447 446 430 431 448 429 463 449 415 462 416 461 417 460 418 459 419 458 420 457 421 456 422 455 423 454 424 453 425 452 426 427 451 450 428 474 473 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 347 372 371 370 392 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 365 366 367 352 353 351 350 364 400 399 398 397 396 395 394 393 472 471 470 469 468 467 466 465 464 414 413 412 411 410 409 408 407 406 405 404 403 402 401368 369 545 546 547 548 SOUTHPORT PARKWAY

C STREET I ROAD J STREET

A STREET

A STREET

K STREET L ROAD

M COURT

O STREET

O STREET P ROAD Q ROAD R ROAD

S STREET S STREET T ROAD U ROAD

V STREET

V STREET

V COURT

X COURT

Y COURT

L ROAD U ROAD N ROAD O STREET W COURT
GREGORY AVENUE PARCEL P G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-12.DWG 0 100 200 300 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 1215 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP SANITARY SEWER & WATER (NORTH) SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 100' DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2023 MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 13 REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 292 NOT A PART BURROWS AVENUE PARCEL BPARCEL A PARCEL R PARCEL L PARCEL M PARCEL 3 PARCEL N JEFFERSON BOULEVARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415161718192021222324 2526 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 122 123 151 150 149 148 124 125 126 127 128 129 130131132 101 133 115 116 117 119 121 105 104 103 100 99 98 97 969594 93 110109108 107 106 112 113 134 83 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 73 81 82 142 141 143144 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 44 45 46 47 48 43 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 102 147 146 145 152 153 154 155 156 157 158159 163 162 161 160 165 166 167 164 168 169 170 171 172 135136137138139140 56 57 58 120 118 111 114 A STREET

B STREET

C STREET E ROAD F ROAD

D STREET G ROAD
C STREETH COURT B STREET C STREET BURROWS AVENUE SOUTH RIVER ROAD/GREGORY AVENUE PARCEL 7 G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-13.DWG 0 100 200 300 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 1315 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP SANITARY SEWER & WATER (SOUTH) SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 100' DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2023 MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 12 REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 293

BEVAN ROAD BEVAN ROAD

JEFFERSON BOULEVARD

LIVERPOOL STREET

SOUTHAMPTON STREET

PROSSER STREET PLYMOUTH ROAD

PARCEL H

PARCEL F
PARCEL G PARCEL I PARCEL J PARCEL C PARCEL E PARCEL D PARCEL A PARCEL R PARCEL O PARCEL Q PARCEL 7 PARCEL K PARCEL 5 LAKE 1A BOTTOM OF LAKE -8.0 159 163 162 161 160 165 166 167 164 168 169 170 171 172 174175176177178179180181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208209210 211212 213 214 215 216217218219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 232 231 230 229 270 269 268 265 266 267 262 263 264 261 260 259 258 257 256255 254 253 252 251250 247 248 249 246 244 245 241 242 243 237 240 239 238 234 235 236 233 173 532 531 530 534 533 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 529 528 527 526 525 521 522 523 524 515 514 513 512 516 517 518 519 520 502 501 500 499 391 390 389 388 387 386 385 384 383 382 381 380 379 378 377 376 375 374 373 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 280 279 281 282 283 284 285 287 286 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 349348 346 345 344 343 342 341 340 339 338 337 336 335 334 333 332 331 330 329 328 327 326 511 510 509 508 507 506 505 504 503 496 497 498 440 438 439 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 479 480 478 476 475 477 441 436 437 442 443 434 435 445 444 432 433 447 446 430 431 448 429 463 449 415 462 416 461 417 460 418 459 419 458 420 457 421 456 422 455 423 454 424 453 425 452 426 427 451 450 428 474 473 314 313 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 347 372 371 370 392 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 365 366 367 352 353351350 364 400 399 398 397 396 395 394 393 472 471 470 469 468 467 466 465 464 414 413 412 411 410 409 408 407 406 405 404 403 402 401 368 369 545 546 547 548 SOUTHPORT PARKWAY H COURT I ROAD

J STREET

A STREET A STREET

K STREET
L ROAD

M COURT

O STREET

O STREET P ROAD Q ROAD R ROAD

S STREET S STREET T ROAD U ROAD

V STREET

V STREET

V COURT

X COURT

Y COURT

L ROAD U ROAD

O STREET

N ROAD W COURT R ROAD
GREGORY AVENUE LAKE 2C PARCEL P G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-14.DWG 0 100 200 300 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 1415 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP STORM DRAIN & GRADING STUDY (NORTH) SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 100' DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2023 MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 15 REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 294

NOT A PART BURROWS AVENUE
JEFFERSON BOULEVARD PARCEL BPARCEL A PARCEL R PARCEL L PARCEL M PARCEL 3 PARCEL N LAKE 1B BOTTOM OF LAKE -8.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14151617181920212223242526 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 122 123 151 150 149 148 124 125 126 127 128129130131132 101 133 115 116 117 119 121 105 104 103 100 99 98 97 969594 93 110 109108107 106 112 113 134 83 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 73 81 82 142 141 143144 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 44 45 46 47 48 43 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 102 147 146 145 152 153 154 155 156 157 158159 163 162 161 160 165 166 167 164 168 169 170 171 172 135136137138139140 56 57 58 120 118 111 114 A STREET

B STREET

C STREET E ROAD F ROAD D STREET G ROAD
C STREET H COURT B STREET C STREET BURROWS AVENUE SOUTH RIVER ROAD/GREGORY AVENUE LAKE 2C PARCEL 7 G:\1139-021\ACAD\TM\PHASE 1\TM-15.DWG 0 100 200 300 OF SHEETS SHEET NO. 1515 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS SAN RAMON WWW.CBANDG.COM ROSEVILLE (925) 866-0322 (916) 788-4456 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP STORM DRAIN & GRADING STUDY (SOUTH) SUBDIVISION #5224 YARBROUGH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1" = 100' DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2023 MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 14 REVISED DATE: JULY 19, 2024 295 296
297
•
Whether the project itself remains unchanged, it seems fair to say that there is substantial new information available and significant changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances surrounding the project. Although partly contemplated by zoning in the general plan, without prophetic insight, the cumulative impact of multiple subsequent developments has not been presently measured or accurately foreseen. There is no current traffic study and for that reason alone, an amended EIR could be judicially obtained after so long a period of dormancy. (See California supreme Court in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo Community college District, (2016) 1 Cal.5th 937).

Summarizing the conclusions of the Cox/Castle letter sounds like this:

Traffic, no significant impact. Schools, no significant impact. Police, no impact at all for 3,000 new homes, as evidenced by deleting, for no good reason, the developers requirement to build a police station and equip it. Why on Earth would you do that? Emergency evacuation issues, no significant impact. Hold on a second. We don't have a bridge to 1-5 and it looks like we'll never get one. We're going to have to go way North across the someday Enterprise bridge but that won't happen for 1 0 years and 300 million dollars. What are we doing in the meantime? Water usage and quality, no significant impact. This is true even without new wells as West Sacramento will just share what water it has to take care of a golf course and a 55 acre lake in canals. We have a lot of lakes going in this community. Could somebody tell us where all the water is and will be coming from? Present level of city services adequately maintained, no significant impact. Exactly what did the city expect the developers attorney to say, having been hired by the developer to make the case for no impacts and thus no annoying and time-consuming EIR amendment?

NO GOLF COURSE OF COURSE
I may be the only one bold enough to say it, but I think most certainly that no 18 hole golf course will ever occur in West Sacramento. And I believe in miracles! We had a golf course. It died. Maybe we can learn from that. 5 minutes on a Google search will tell you that 10 of the 30 golf courses in the area have closed or are going to close. This is happening all over California, generally over cost and water issues. It's just too expensive to maintain them. They are not revenue raisers for a city. They are a drag on City services and resources. Cities end up buying them from developers so they don't turn to blight. Then the city can't afford to maintain such an amenity in the present economy.

A recent article by the editorial board of the California Register says, "California should turn government owned golf courses into homes." (July 5, 2023, the Orange County Register). That is likely what eventually may occur here. The city has no contingency plan if a golf course does not arise and no feasibility study to even consider whether a golf course is a good idea. The public really needs to know that even if a miracle happened, it would be 8 to 1 O years, or more, down the road before anyone should shine their clubs up. Although the developer is to start the golf course in phase one that simply means grading and using the space for other dirt moving and equipment storage and staging that needs to occur anyway. If a golf course doesn't happen, it leaves us with unmaintained open space which usually turns to houses eventually. One should look at a development like buying a horse. Pay attention to the horse and not the beautiful saddle. Eye candy is not sweet.

WHY NOT A PUBLIC WORKSHOP
Over 10,000 people have moved in since the 2008 development agreement. They. likely have no idea what's happening with Yarbrough right about now except by virtue of the puffer pieces on channel 13 that 2 298
rave about a beautiful golf course coming soon to West Sacramento. Those that were here long ago have likely forgotten what the substance of this project was and the significance of what it means to the rest of the community. Only those within 500 ft have ever been noticed about the project and there's been no newspaper or online, or mass mailing notice by the city to develop public awareness before pushing this development through.

Some wise citizens have urged that at least one public workshop take place giving people a last chance to put in their two cents and if nothing else, to understand exactly what's going to happen before they find out the hard way when a construction truck breaks their windshield with a rock.

The Yarborough zombie suddenly rose from the dead recently, but unlike most zombies, it immediately began running at full speed toward approval. The counter argument for public awareness is that they had their chance in 2008 and they wouldn't show up anyway even if we had a public workshop. I do not agree.

Every option should be exhausted to let the citizens, who voted for our representatives, know exactly what it is that's going to happen and why. The last Planning Commission meeting was not elucidating.

Why then can we not have at least one noticed public workshop? I understand the developers desire to move the project forward and his need, with respect to financing, to get it under way now. I respect that and think that this developer has earned the right to see his project approved. It is a beautiful and wonderful project in very many ways. However, that should not override the Planning Commission's obligation to plan, and then to let the citizens know the plan. Here's a simple suggestion:

Put the matter over for one month. I think the developer will live through it. Put a notice in the newspaper of a public workshop. Get the information on the West Sacramento Community Facebook Site followed a lot of people in this community. Post the matter on the city website in every conceivable obvious way, multiple times. It's cheap. Do a direct mailing to the 20,000 residences which, at the government rate, should cost about $3,000 and be paid by the developer. You can't make people aware who won't listen but you should take every opportunity to give those who want to know, a chance to to be informed.

S·P' A f ft ✓-) 5
CONCLUSION ��
, c , pe,,
..,--�,.,nr
Ji-� � 1}·1-1�1�;J.t2...../
I'm in support of this project moving forward. And.fuoving forward without a new or amended EIR. The benefits outweigh the detriment. Development is messy and not fun. There isn't now, and may not be a better development proposed. However, the public should know as much as they possibly can about what's coming and have an opportunity to hear about it before they experience it. The benefits of this project seem to outweigh the detriment but the detriment seems somewhat hidden and shouldn't be. It should be clear and obvious and not hyped or manipulated by legal opinions that are paid for their conclusion. Planning Commissioners and City Council Members should take responsibility for this plan, not just if it works out well, but also if it does not. And while we have a moment to breathe, get the WUSD involved. They just don't seem to be on top of this.

Let's give the people the information they deserve and move forward honestly and forthrightly.

Kimber Goddard
Resident
Attorney at law
3 299
300
Submitted 10/23/24
VIA EMAIL: WEST SACRAMENTO CITY CLERK, by

KIMBER B GODDARD
APPELLANT: YARBROUGH APPEAL
NOVEMBER 6, 2024, 7PM
16-Year-Old Yarbrough EIR Document Fails: Refutation of Yarbrough Project And Cox/Castle CEQA Analysis
Introduction: Legal Deficiencies in the 2008 EIR
The 2008 Yarbrough EIR is no longer adequate given the significant developmental, environmental, regulatory and population changes that have occurred over 16 years. There Is substantial evidence that significant and unanticipated impacts of these changes were not contemplated in the antiquated EIR. Not the least among these obviously unanticipated impacts, is the substantial evidence of the unforeseen impact of the passage of time itself. CEQA environmental reviews, and the Yarbrough EIR specifically, are intended to support reasonably imminent projects, not those delayed for decades. The Yarbrough development rose up like a zombie from the grave and began running, without further public workshops or review of present circumstances, to an immediate approval from the West Sacramento Planning Commission.

Reactivating Yarbrough without updating its environmental analysis opens the project to legal risks. The 16-year-old EIR fails even the simplest test of necessary foreseeability of the changes in circumstances delineated below.

Applicable Case Law And History
In Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1112, the court held that new environmental risks require supplemental CEQA review. Similarly, Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. County of Madera (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 48 ruled that outdated assumptions become invalid when conditions change.

However, overruled in part, Madera was modified by Neighbors For Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority, (2013) 57 Cal. 4th 439, creating an expanded standard of environmental review regarding present and future impact projections.

A 16-year-old EIR faces significant challenges under CEQA because environmental conditions change over time, often making old baselines outdated. The California Supreme Court’s ruling in Neighbors for Smart Rail adds an additional burden for older EIRs that try to rely on a projected or outdated baseline: the agency must show substantial evidence justifying why 301
comparing impacts against current conditions would be either impractical, unhelpful, or misleading. No such effort was made by the proponents relative to the Yarbrough EIR.

How would an old EIR have to address the Neighbors Standard of review?

1. Demonstrating the EIR is Still Relevant:
○ The agency would need to update the analysis or show why the environmental impacts expected when the EIR was written still hold today. This could mean documenting that the physical environment hasn’t changed significantly since the EIR was prepared, or that the old baseline data accurately reflects today’s conditions. Instead, the Yarbrough Proponents and the Lead Agency, City of West Sacramento, attempt to foist the burden upon citizens, to “Produce substantial evidence of new or more severe environmental effects pursuant to QEQA guidelines, Section 15162 given that the project has remained substantially the same to date.” ( City of West Sacramento, Planning Commission meeting 8/15/24, Staff Report Agenda item number 5 page 7 paragraph 7). ○

2. Substantial Evidence Justification:
○ If the agency wants to rely only on outdated future projections from the original EIR, it must show why using existing 2024 conditions would be misleading or not useful. For example, it might argue that the original project timeline or environmental context was interrupted by delays, and that comparing impacts against today’s environment wouldn’t provide meaningful information for decision-makers or the public. Applying that idea In this case would be anathema to the project proponents. In the instant situation, the Yarbrough proponents are scared to death to make such a claim or to analyze present conditions at all, because they know full well that significant unforeseen impacts have occurred dramatically in multiple ways. A scintilla of analysis with the naked eye would substantiate numerous unforeseen present environmental circumstances that have come to pass over 16 years. In essence, the proponents are saying they would like to rely now, on what they thought conditions might be like when they considered environmental impacts 16 years ago, and take no notice, whatsoever, of what actually is the present case and what has occurred over this significant time frame.
.

3. The Burden of Evidence and Justification:
○ The substantial evidence must include studies, data, or reports proving that the baseline used in the old EIR still gives a more accurate picture of the project's likely impacts than if current conditions were considered. Without this, courts may find that the EIR violates CEQA by not sufficiently informing the public and decision-makers about the current environmental impact of the project. After resurrection from the dead, the Yarbrough project, 16 years later, produced not one current study, report or baseline, creating any type of a present picture of the modern environment in which the project now thrusts itself as if it were newly 302
born. Relying on a 16-year-old EIR is risky unless it’s updated with current data or justified with substantial evidence showing why only the old projections remain relevant.

Unanticipated Changed Developments Create Unforseen Cumulative Impacts Several concurrent developments—Liberty (pending in Planning Commission), River Point (proposed and pending), and Kinect (near completion)—will generate cumulative environmental impacts that the original EIR did not address:

1. Liberty Development:
○ 1,500 housing units, adding 3,000-5,000 residents and 1,500 vehicles

2. River Point Development:
○ Another 1,500 units with comparable vehicles and impacts

3. Kinect Infill Project:
○ Multi-story apartment housing along Jefferson Boulevard, adding hundreds of vehicles and residents
The original EIR does not consider these cumulative impacts, violating CEQA Guideline, § 15064(h)(4), which requires cumulative environmental analysis when multiple developments generate significant effects together.

Flooding Risks Require CEQA Review Under SB 5, SB 586, and FEMA’s 200-Year Flood Rule
“Surrounded by water during the winter months, the city of West Sacramento depends on Levees for its resident’s safety. A failure at any location in the Levee system during a 50 year or greater flood event results in an inundation of more than 90% of the entire city, with flood water, up to 20 ft deep. Evacuation routes, including freeway on/off-ramps would be compromised in as little as 2 hours, impacting the ability to get to higher ground.”(HDR National Engineering Excellence Review, page 1, paragraph 1, “Flood Protection For Residents of and Businesses of West Sacramento.).

The 2008 Yarbrough EIR did not anticipate significant regulatory legislative changes, including SB 5, SB 586, and FEMA’s 200-year flood rule, which now affect the project’s viability. West Sacramento currently lacks the required 200-year flood protection and will not meet FEMA’s requirements, if ever, before The Yarbrough projects projected build out of 2045.

FEMA’s long promised remapping will likely reclassify the area into a Special Flood Hazard Zone, leading to increased flood insurance premiums and restrictions, if not a moratorium, on future development.
303
Under SB 586, the “adequate progress exception” allows limited development, until 2036, only if the city demonstrates significant levee repair and upgrade progress annually, including securing 90% of necessary funding at the end of each year. However, since the Yarbrough buildout is unlikely to be completed before 2045, we will be well beyond any reasonable time frame for such mitigation. Since the city of West Sacramento has been working on it’s seeping, leaking and crumbling levees for the past 40 years or more, it is unlikely that the 200-year FEMA rule will give much comfort to the contemplated 10,000 or more residents in the combined Yarbrough development area. Additionally, the retention of the Main Drain complicates flood management further, adding new risks not accounted for in the original EIR.

In San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center v. County of Merced (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 645, the court ruled that emerging flood risks require supplemental CEQA review, even when an EIR has already been certified. The same principle applies here, as both new legislation and delayed flood protection measures present new risks that must be addressed through updated analysis.

Traffic and Emergency Access Impacts Are Not Adequately Contemplated Traffic Issues
No new traffic study has been conducted for the Yarbrough project in the last 16 years.

The original analysis relied on outdated traffic assumptions and LOS metrics, which no longer meet CEQA’s modern standards. Yarbrough, Liberty, River Point and Kinect developments may add a cumulative 6,000 to 10,000 more cars using the Jefferson Boulevard arterial, the main north-south corridor of West Sacramento, which is already crumbling for lack of repair and experiencing signal failures and congestion issues. This was not contemplated in the original EIR.

With Yarbrough, Liberty, and River Point projects coming on simultaneously, and the Kinect project nearing completion, the compounded impact on Jefferson Boulevard will create severe traffic bottlenecks, safety risks, and emergency access issues. Kinect’s location along Jefferson further worsens the problem by adding more vehicles to an already overloaded corridor point. Without mitigation, the cumulative increase in traffic will overwhelm the existing infrastructure.

The widening of Jefferson Boulevard—a key infrastructure improvement—will not be completed until the Yarbrough project builds 400 units, meaning the early phases of development will proceed without adequate road capacity. This delay will increase accident risks, lengthen emergency response times, and worsen commutes.

In Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environmental Development v. City of San Diego (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 515, the court held that outdated traffic data fails to meet CEQA’s requirements for environmental review. Similarly, Clover Valley Foundation v. City of Rocklin (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 200 confirmed that increased traffic from new developments 304
requires updated analysis, especially when cumulative impacts were not originally contemplated.

The lack of a new traffic study for the Yarbrough project, coupled with concurrent construction of large developments like Liberty and River Point, leaves critical infrastructure unprepared for the surge in demand. West Sacramento faces gridlock conditions, heightened safety risks, and crumbling infrastructure along Jefferson Boulevard and adjacent roads without immediate mitigation and updated analysis.

School Capacity and Public Services Require Reevaluation Local schools are already at capacity, and the additional 15-20,000 residents will overwhelm existing infrastructure. There is no evidence of consultation with the school district to ensure adequate land is reserved for new facilities. To the contrary, this writer contacted the Washington Unified School District Superintendent and City staff directly, and confirmed that no discussions were had relative to the project. The Proponent’s observation that school enrollment is declining overall in Yolo County is relatively worthless as an observation pertaining to this project.

Chawanakee Unified School Dist. v. County of Madera (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 1016:

Chawanakee holds that CEQA requires mitigation planning for population-driven increases in school capacity. The 2008 EIR document in Yarbrough fails to take into account any modern, relevant, current conditions and has no studies, reports or data relative to the present circumstances of the Washington Unified School District Water Quality and Biological Resources Risks Must Be Reassessed The retention of the Main Drain introduces new risks of stormwater contamination, which were not addressed in the original EIR. In Communities for a Better Environment v. City of Richmond (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 70, the court required supplemental review when new public health risks arose.

Additionally, the project threatens the habitats of the giant garter snake and Swainson’s hawk, both of which are protected species. Updated mitigation plans are required under the Yolo HCP/NCCP.

Energy Demand, Infrastructure Capacity, and Public Utilities The Yarbrough, Liberty, and River Point developments will strain public utilities and increase energy demand. CEQA Guides § 15126.2(b) requires agencies to assess whether a project 305
causes wasteful energy consumption and ensures that infrastructure can meet cumulative demand. Without upgrades, the area risks power outages, brownouts, and overwhelmed storm drains. The Yarbrough project EIR fails to adequately consider these facts.

In addition, the related hydrological disposition matter of wastewater treatment planning has not been studied in the EIR, relative to the new wastewater treatment plant. it is unknown how close to full capacity West Sacramento's wastewater treatment system has come or how much more it can handle in light of the proposed 15-20,000 more people expected under cumulative developments in the next 15 to 20 years.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The combined developments will increase air pollution and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3 require VMT-based assessments to calculate emissions, but the 2008 EIR relied on outdated LOS metrics. California’s SB 32 and AB 32 mandate reductions in GHG emissions, necessitating updated analysis.

Proponents' Main Cases Are Refuted and Don’t Apply
The proponents of the Yarbrough Project have relied on several cases to argue against the need for supplemental environmental review. However, these cases are distinguishable or inapplicable to the present circumstances. Below is a detailed refutation of the cases cited by the proponents:

1. Bowman v. City of Petaluma (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 1065 ○ Fact Pattern: This case involved a challenge to the EIR that was prepared for a completed and operational housing development in Petaluma. The petitioners sought to invalidate the project long after construction had begun, arguing that environmental review was insufficient.
○ Refutation: The Bowman case is not analogous to the Yarbrough Project. Unlike the completed retail commercial project in Bowman, the Yarbrough Project is a huge 3005 unit residential project that has been delayed for 16 years and faces new environmental risks, such as legislative changes and cumulative impacts.

CEQA mandates updated analysis when conditions change, as reaffirmed in Madera Oversight Coalition v. County of Madera (2011).
306

2. Friends of Davis v. City of Davis (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1004 ○ Fact Pattern: This case centered on whether an updated EIR was required for a project aligned with the general plan. The court found that because the project matched the general plan and posed no new environmental concerns, additional CEQA review was unnecessary.
○ Refutation: The circumstances in Friends of Davis differ from Yarbrough as applied to a project ministerial changes. Legislative changes (SB 5, SB 586, FEMA rules) and the impacts of surrounding developments and other changes over 16 years, require updated environmental analysis under CEQA, distinguishing this case from Friends of Davis.

3. San Diego Navy Broadway Complex Coalition v. City of San Diego (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 924
○ Fact Pattern: This case involved a waterfront redevelopment where the opponents argued that new CEQA review was necessary due to climate change concerns. The court ruled that since environmental climate issues were already addressed in the original EIR, no supplemental analysis was required. ○ Refutation: The San Diego Navy Broadway case is distinguishable from Yarbrough. The environmental landscape has significantly changed with respect to Yarbrough, to include not merely climate, but including traffic, flood risks and cumulative impacts. These changes necessitate new analysis, making supplemental review mandatory.

Conclusion: A New or Supplemental EIR is Legally Required The Yarbrough Project faces flood risks, traffic congestion, School overcrowding, emergency access delays, and overwhelmed public services, making the original EIR legally insufficient. Courts in Laurel Heights, Madera (as still effective in part), Neighbors and San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center confirm that long delayed projects may well require new environmental analysis. The City must conduct a new or amended EIR to protect public safety and ensure sustainable development.

KIMBER B GODDARD, Attorney at Law, 45 year Resident, West Sacramento, California 307
105791\18119117v1
www.coxcastle.com Los Angeles | Orange County | San Francisco Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP
50 California Street, Suite 3200
San Francisco, California 94111-4710
P: 415.262.5100 F: 415.262.5199
October 28, 2024
City Council
City of West Sacramento
c/o City Clerk’s Office
1110 W. Capitol Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Email: [email protected]
Re: Response to Administrative Appeal of Kimber Goddard Yarbrough Phase I Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5224 and Amended and Restated Development Agreement
Honorable City Council members,
On behalf of ASB Southport II, LLC (“ASB”), this letter provides a response to the administrative appeal filed by Kimber Goddard on August 23, 2024, and Mr. Goddard’s “Appellant’s Brief” dated October 23, 2024 (“Goddard Appeal”), challenging the City of West Sacramento (“City”) Planning Commission’s August 15, 2024, adoption of Resolution 24-2PC approving ASB’s application for a Phase I Vesting Tentative Map (“VTM”) for the Yarbrough Master Plan Project (“Project”) and Resolution 24-3PC recommending the City Council adopt Ordinance 24-11 approving the Amended and Restated Development Agreement (“ARDA”) for the Project. The City Council originally approved the Project in 2008, and the Phase I VTM and ARDA implement the previously approved Project. As part of the original approval, the City prepared and certified the Yarbrough Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (“Yarbrough EIR”) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). Mr. Goddard also provided written comments on the Yarbrough Draft EIR, to which the City responded in the Yarbrough Final EIR. (Yarbrough Final EIR, pp. 3-45—3-48.) The Goddard Appeal and email correspondence from Mr. Goddard to ASB and City staff contain general assertions pertaining to potential CEQA impacts of the Project, Mr. Goddard’s criticism of the Project’s provision of affordable housing (including several inflammatory allegations about the use of this housing for immigrants), his opinion that the Project’s proposed golf course is not feasible, his request for a public workshop and direct mailings to City residents beyond the required legal public notice, and other general criticisms of the City Planning Commission and City staff. This letter addresses only those aspects of the Goddard Appeal that relate to substantive or procedural legal requirements associated with the City’s review and consideration of the Project’s Phase I VTM and ARDA and does not provide commentary on Mr.

Goddard’s personal opinions or other generalized criticisms that have no legal bearing on the City’s consideration of the Goddard Appeal. While not part of the Goddard Appeal submittal, this letter also addresses claims contained in subsequent email correspondence from Mr.

Goddard to the extent it bears on the issues raised in the Goddard Appeal. 308
105791\18119117v1
City Council
October 28, 2024