together with the TIF update is also necessary to address and support current transportation policies adopted in the City’s General Plan.
Considering all these programs are interrelated, City Staff released a request for proposals (RFP) for one consultant team to prepare the following necessary program and policy document updates:
1. Travel Demand Model:
The City requires a more robust travel demand model than the current options available to better reflect existing conditions, recent changes in travel patterns, changes in legislation for identifying transportation impacts, analyze changes to development patterns and future land use scenarios, and analyze a variety of proposed multi-modal transportation improvements.
2. TIF Program:
The updated TIF Program includes reconciling LOS and VMT policy goals as the basis for evaluating transportation impact fees. This also includes application of the updated Travel Demand Model, updates to future growth scenarios proposed at years 2035 and 2050 consistent with the SACOG region Blueprint, revisions to the list of transportation improvement projects, associated LOS and VMT analyses, and new preliminary roadway improvement cost estimates.
The current transportation impact fees were developed in 2005, with a minor update in 2010.
3. VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program
The VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program includes establishment of VMT analysis methodology, thresholds, and screening criteria for new development projects. This will include the application of the updated Travel Demand Model, development of a list of projects or programs that reduce City-wide VMT, and determination of a fee program structure for individual development projects that have significant VMT impacts pursuant to SB 743, CEQA, and the City's General Plan.
4. Transportation Analysis Guidelines
The updated Transportation Analysis Guidelines incorporates the CEQA standards and general plan mobility element policies, and state of the practice for preparing transportation studies. This will include the analysis details and methodologies established in the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program. The last transportation analysis guidelines were developed in 2005. Staff have followed standard best practices as they have updated over time; however, a comprehensive guiding document outlining the methodology used by the City for transportation studies is needed to share with external consultants on future projects to improve efficiency and consistency.
ANALYSIS
Initial efforts to update the TIF Program update started in 2017. After nearly 18 months, the consultant team selected to prepare the TIF update was unable to reach consensus among the City’s Economic Development Department, Public Works (later Capital Projects Department) and Community Development Department on the policy goals and methodology for updating the TIF. A new consultant was selected in late 2019 and picked up on the work that was left by the prior consultant. Unfortunately, as the effort was underway the world was upended by the COVID-19 pandemic which presented a significant disruption to advancing the TIF studies as consultant and City staff adapted to changes both in-office and to transportation systems locally and within the Sacramento region. An immediate effect was a drastic reduction in travel, and in particular morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) peak-hour travel, leading to free-flowing traffic conditions during timeframes that were previously congested within the city, and temporal pattern of demand changes due to increased regular and periodic remote work and other factors such as a shifting trend in acceptable workday hours led to a stop work order on the advancement of the TIF and associated studies to better understand long-term effects of the pandemic.
In late 2022 as lockdowns ended, the update was revived with the goal of modernizing the TIF together with VMT and analysis guidelines as a comprehensive package. Following the award of grant funding from Caltrans, as well as the hiring of a Senior Transportation Engineer in the Transportation and Mobility Division, the program is in a position to once again advance.
The latest procurement for this project was handled in accordance with the City’s procurement procedures for professional services. Due to the complexity and scale of the services requested, City Staff provided a pre-RFP notice starting January 23, 2025, to provide prospective consultants with preliminary details of the scope of work, and additional time to coordinate and prepare for a proposal.
A competitive procurement process was completed to select the proposed consultant team led by Kimley-Horn, to complete the updates and development of the Travel Demand Model, Transportation Impact Fee Program, VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program, and Transportation Analysis Guidelines contract. 127
Professional Services Contract to Kimley-Horn for Travel Model, Transportation Impact Fee, VMT Reduction Program August 20, 2025
On March 28, 2025, 25-018-RFP was released for Travel Model, Transportation Impact & VMT Mitigation Fees, and Analysis Guidelines and advertised to prospective consultants through OpenGov. The RFP received two (2) proposals by the submission deadline of May 23, 2025, from the following lead consultants, listed below in alphabetical order:
Kimley-Horn, Sacramento CA
Resource Systems Group (RSG), Portland OR
City staff, consisting of representatives from various Divisions/Departments within the City including Community Development, Capital Projects, Economic Development and Housing, and Finance, formed the evaluation panel which first identified that the two consultant proposal teams were sufficient to proceed with the competitive evaluation process; reissuance of the RFP was considered, but not advanced due to the sufficient amount of time and information shared during the pre-RFP and official RFP release period.
The City evaluation panel held interviews with the two consultant teams on June 12, 2025. The panel interviews began with presentations from each consultant team’s understanding of the City’s requirements and included their project managers and key team members elaborating on details outlined within their proposal. The remaining period of the interview included questions from staff to further assess the evaluation criteria of technical approach, technical qualifications and experience, project management qualifications and experience, and the cost proposal.
After reviewing each consultant team’s proposal, presentation, and responses to questions asked during the interviews, each individual on the evaluation panel submitted their scores, with the panel unanimously identifying the Kimley-Horn led consultant team as the most qualified vendor recommended for consideration of award. The City and Kimley-Horn negotiated the scope of work and cost proposal, as detailed in Attachment 1.
Environmental Considerations
This action is not a "project" for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq. ("CEQA"), because it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and, therefore, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines sections 15060(c) and 15378(a), it is not subject to environmental review.
Commission Recommendation
This is an administrative item and does not have new policy implications that would require Transportation, Mobility, and Infrastructure Commission input. As such, this item was not presented to the TMI Commission.
Staff will return to the Commission and Council with updates through the development of the Travel Demand Model, Transportation Impact Fee Update, VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program to seek direction on priorities for projects and policies and feedback on the draft program updates prior to adoption at a City Council public hearing.
Strategic Plan Integration
This project advances the 2025 Strategic Plan Principles: “Mobility & Connectivity,” in support of providing convenient and sustainable choices for people to get where they are going, “Inclusive & Diverse,” in support of equitable investment and social/environmental justice in the city, and “Core Services & Infrastructure,” in support of sustaining a financially sound city in which everyone feels safe and secure, with quality services and wellmaintained infrastructure.
Alternatives
The Council’s primary alternatives are:
1) Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council take the recommended action as stated above. 2) The City Council may elect to set forth proposed conditions or modifications to the scope of work proposed by staff;
3) City Council may elect not to approve the contract at this time.
Staff recommend Alternative 1 to address the ongoing needs to keep our transportation planning practice up-todate and streamlined. Staff does not recommend Alternatives 2 or 3, as the current scope of work has been approved by Caltrans, coordinated across departments, and negotiated to establish the rates set forth by the Consultant. Revisions or additional conditions could cause delays to the start of work and risk exceeding the grant deadline. Additionally, the current outdated transportation planning programs and documents will continue 128
Professional Services Contract to Kimley-Horn for Travel Model, Transportation Impact Fee, VMT Reduction Program August 20, 2025
to make the City less efficient in reviewing future transportation needs. This work is critical to achieving the strategic plan principles to address mobility and sustaining financially sound and well-maintained infrastructure.
Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Transportation & Mobility Division of the Community Development Department.
Coordination during the development of the request for proposals and evaluation of the consultant teams was received from the Planning Division of Community Development, Capital Projects, Economic Development and Housing, Finance, and Parks & Recreation.
Budget/Cost Impact
The current appropriated and available funds for the overall project is $813,339, which includes funding from the Caltrans Sustainable Communities Grant ($354,120) with local matching funds ($45,880) and remaining local TIF and one-time General Fund appropriations totaling $413,339.
The breakdown of costs to provide the professional consultant services for the Travel Model, TIF, VMT, Transportation Analysis Guidelines:
PROJECT COSTS: TRAVEL MODEL, TIF, VMT, TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS GUIDELINES Negotiated Professional Services Contract with Kimley-Horn team (Base Cost) $724,400 10% held for Contingencies $72,400
Estimated Staff and Resources Cost $166,539
Total Project Cost $963,339
Remaining Appropriated Funds for Project (CIP 11230 & 13005) $813,339 Project Surplus / Deficit ($150,000)
Based on the information in the above table, the recommended action to approve all tasks is bridging the budget shortfall of $150,000.
ATTACHMENTS
1. CDD25-229 Kimley-Horn Contract for the Travel Model, TIF, VMT, Transportation Analysis Guidelines
2. Resolution 25-85
129
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CDD25-229 Travel Model TIF VMT Project
Expires on 12/31/2027
1 11/4/24
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
THIS CONTRACT is made on August 20, 2025, by and between the CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (“City”), and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (“Consultant”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City desires professional services for updates and development of the City’s travel demand model, transportation impact fee (TIF) program, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reduction and mitigation fee program, and transportation analysis guidelines.
WHEREAS, the Consultant has presented a proposal for such services to the City, dated May 23, 2025, (attached hereto as Exhibit “A”) and is duly licensed, qualified and experienced to perform those services;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES:
A. Consultant shall do all work, attend all meetings, produce all reports and carry out all activities necessary to completion of the services described in Exhibit “A” Scope of Work.
This Contract and its exhibits shall be known as the “Contract Documents.” Terms set forth in any Contract Document shall be deemed to be incorporated in all Contract Documents as if set forth in full therein. In the event of conflict between terms contained in these Contract Documents, the more specific term shall control. If any portion of the Contract Documents shall be in conflict with any other portion, provisions contained in the Contract shall govern over conflicting provisions contained in the exhibits to the Contract.
B. Consultant enters into this Contract as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City. The Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Contract to bind the City in any respect. Nothing in this Contract shall be construed to be inconsistent with this relationship or status. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by the Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of the Consultant and not of the City. The City shall not be obligated in any way to pay any wage claims or other claims made against Consultant by any such employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, or any other person resulting from performance of this Contract. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, To the greatest extent permitted by law, Consultant and its employees, agents, and subcontractors shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.
130
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CDD25-229 Travel Model TIF VMT Project
Expires on 12/31/2027
2 11/4/24
C. The Consultant agrees it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.
2. TERM OF CONTRACT
A. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Contract by the City, and shall be undertaken and completed in accordance with the Schedule of Performance attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit “B” and terminate on December 31, 2027. As identified in the Schedule of Performance and Scope of Work, the portion of work that is funded through the Caltrans Sustainable Communities Grant (Budget A) must be completed by June 30, 2027.
B. Consultant’s failure to complete work in accordance with the Schedule of Performance may result in delayed compensation as described in Section 3.
C. The City Manager or his or her designee may, by written instrument signed by the Parties, extend the duration of this Contract for two (2) additional three-month extensions in the manner provided in Section 5, provided that the extension does not require the payment of compensation in excess of the Council approved budget.
3. COMPENSATION:
A. The Consultant shall be paid monthly for the actual fees, costs and expenses for all time and materials required and expended, but in no event shall total compensation exceed seven hundred twenty-four thousand, three hundred seventy-seven dollars and seventeen cents ($724,377.17), without City’s prior written approval. Consultant's fees shall be as specified in the Schedule of Fees, which is attached hereto an incorporated herein as Exhibit "C".
B. Said amount shall be paid upon submittal of a monthly billing showing completion of the tasks that month. Consultant shall furnish City with invoices for all expenses as well as for all materials authorized by this Contract. The invoices shall be submitted with the monthly billings.
If Consultant’s performance is not in conformity with the Schedule of Performance, payments may be delayed or denied, unless the Consultant’s failure to perform in conformity with the Schedule of Performance is a documented result of the City’s failure to conform with the Schedule of Performance, or if the Schedule of Performance is extended pursuant to Section 5.
C. If the work is halted at the request of the City, compensation shall be based upon the proportion that the work performed bears to the total work required by this Contract, subject to Section 4.
4. TERMINATION:
A. This Contract may be terminated by either party, provided that the other party is given not less than 30 calendar days’ written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate.
B. The City may temporarily suspend this Contract, at no additional cost to City, provided that the Consultant is given written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of temporary suspension. If City gives such notice of temporary suspension, Consultant shall immediately suspend its activities under this Contract. 131
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CDD25-229 Travel Model TIF VMT Project
Expires on 12/31/2027
3 11/4/24
C. Notwithstanding any provisions of this Contract, Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this Contract by Consultant, and the City may withhold any payments due to Consultant until such time as the exact amount of damages, if any, due the City from Consultant is determined.
D. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be compensated as provided for in this Contract, except as provided in Section 4C. Upon termination, the City shall be entitled to all work, including but not limited to, appraisals, inventories, studies, analyses, drawings and data estimates performed to that date in accordance with Section 7 hereof.
5. AMENDMENTS, CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS:
Amendments, changes or modifications in the terms of this Contract may be made at any time by mutual written agreement between the parties hereto and shall be signed by the persons authorized to bind the parties hereto.
6. EXTENSIONS OF TIME:
Consultant may, for good cause, request extensions of time to perform the services required hereunder. Such extensions shall be authorized in advance by the City in writing and shall be incorporated in written amendments to this Contract or the attached Work Program in the manner provided in Section 5.
7. PROPERTY OF CITY:
A. It is mutually agreed that all materials prepared by the Consultant under this Contract shall become the property of the City, and the Consultant shall have no property right therein whatsoever. Immediately upon termination, the City shall be entitled to, and the Consultant shall deliver to the City, all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and other such materials as may have been prepared or accumulated to date by the Consultant in performing this Contract which is not Consultant’s privileged information, as defined by law, or Consultant’s personnel information, along with all other property belonging exclusively to the City which is in the Consultant’s possession. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any materials, work product, etc. prepared by the Consultant does not include any of Consultant's Technology Solutions software products. If any of Consultant’s Technology Solutions software products are provided to City as part of this project then a separate software license agreement will be required and Consultant shall retain all rights, titles, and interests, including but not limited to all ownership and intellectual property rights, in all inventions, improvements, discoveries, methodologies, models, formats, software, algorithms, processes, procedures, designs, specifications, findings, and other intellectual properties developed, gathered, compiled or produced by Consultant prior to or independently of any of the Work under this Contract (“Technology Solutions”), including such Technology Solutions that Consultant may employ in the performance of this Contract, or may incorporate into any part of the Work product.
B. Additionally, it is agreed that the parties intend this to be a contract for services and each considers the products and results of the services to be rendered by Consultant hereunder (the “Work”) to be a work made for hire. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that the Work (and all rights therein, including, without limitation, copyright) belongs to and shall be the sole and exclusive property of the City. Notwithstanding the forgoing, if any of Consultant’s Technology Solutions software products are provided to City as part of this project then a separate 132
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CDD25-229 Travel Model TIF VMT Project
Expires on 12/31/2027
4 11/4/24
software license agreement will be required and Consultant shall retain all rights, titles, and interests, including but not limited to all ownership and intellectual property rights, in all inventions, improvements, discoveries, methodologies, models, formats, software, algorithms, processes, procedures, designs, specifications, findings, and other intellectual properties developed, gathered, compiled or produced by Consultant prior to or independently of any of the Work under this Contract (“Technology Solutions”), including such Technology Solutions that Consultant may employ in the performance of this Contract, or may incorporate into any part of the Work product.] C. The reuse of any of the materials or documents described in Paragraph 7.A by the City on any other project without the written permission of the Consultant, shall be at the City's sole risk and the City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Consultant from all claims, damages and expenses, including attorney's fees, arising out of such unauthorized reuse by the City or by others acting through the City. The Consultant is not responsible and liability is waived by the City as against the Consultant for use by the City or any other person of any data, reports, plans or drawings not signed by the Consultant. Notwithstanding the forgoing, if any of Consultant’s Technology Solutions software products are provided to City as part of this project then a separate software license agreement will be required and Consultant shall retain all rights, titles, and interests, including but not limited to all ownership and intellectual property rights, in all inventions, improvements, discoveries, methodologies, models, formats, software, algorithms, processes, procedures, designs, specifications, findings, and other intellectual properties developed, gathered, compiled or produced by Consultant prior to or independently of any of the Work under this Contract (“Technology Solutions”), including such Technology Solutions that Consultant may employ in the performance of this Contract, or may incorporate into any part of the Work product.
8. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS:
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of federal, State and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Contract. It shall be City’s responsibility to obtain all rights of way and easements to enable Consultant to perform its services hereunder.
Consultant shall assist City in providing the same.
B. Consultant warrants to the City that it is licensed by all applicable governmental bodies to perform this Contract and will remain so licensed throughout the progress of the Work, and that it has, and will have, throughout the progress of the Work, the necessary experience, skill and financial resources to enable it to perform this Contract.
9. WARRANTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES - CONSULTANT:
A. Consultant agrees and represents that it is qualified to properly provide the services set forth in Exhibit “A” in a manner which is consistent with the generally accepted standards of Consultant’s profession.
B. Consultant agrees and represents that the work performed under this Contract shall be in accordance with applicable federal, State and local law in accordance with Section 17A hereof.
C. Consultant shall designate a project manager who at all times shall represent the Consultant before the City on all matters relating to this Contract. The project manager shall continue in such capacity unless and until he or she is removed at the request of the City, is no 133
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CDD25-229 Travel Model TIF VMT Project
Expires on 12/31/2027
5 11/4/24
longer employed by Consultant, or is replaced with the written approval of the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
D. Consultant shall provide corrective services without charge to the City for services which fail to meet the above professional and legal standards and which are reported to Consultant in writing within sixty (60) days of discovery. Should Consultant fail or refuse to perform promptly its obligations, the City may render or undertake performance thereof and the Consultant shall be liable for any expenses thereby incurred.
10. SUBCONTRACTING:
None of the services covered by this Contract shall be subcontracted without the prior written consent of the City, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Consultant shall be as fully responsible to the City for the negligent acts and omissions of its contractors and subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as it is for the negligent acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Consultant.
11. ASSIGNABILITY:
Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Contract whether by assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of the City which will not be unreasonably withheld.
However, claims for money due or to become due Consultant from the City under this Contract may be assigned to a financial institution, or to a trustee in bankruptcy, without such approval.
Notice of any assignment or transfer whether voluntary or involuntary shall be furnished promptly to the City.
12. INTEREST IN CONTRACT:
Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any of its employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the subject of the Contract, nor any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of its services hereunder. Consultant shall make all disclosures required by the City’s conflict of interest code in accordance with the category designated by the City, unless the City Manager determines in writing that Consultant’s duties are more limited in scope than is warranted by the category designated by the City code and that a narrower disclosure category should apply. Consultant also agrees to make disclosure in compliance with the City conflict of interest code if, at any time after the execution of this Contract, City determines and notifies Consultant in writing that Consultant’s duties under this Contract warrant greater disclosure by Consultant than was originally contemplated. Consultant shall make disclosures in the time, place and manner set forth in the conflict of interest code and as directed by the City.
13. MATERIALS CONFIDENTIAL:
All of the materials prepared or assembled by Consultant pursuant to performance of this Contract are confidential and Consultant agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City, except by court order.
14. LIABILITY OF CONSULTANT-NEGLIGENCE:
Consultant shall be responsible for performing the work under this Contract in a manner which is consistent with the generally-accepted standards of the Consultant’s profession and shall 134
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CDD25-229 Travel Model TIF VMT Project
Expires on 12/31/2027
6 11/4/24
be liable for its own negligence and the negligent acts of its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors. The City shall have no right of control over the manner in which the work is to be done but only as to its outcome, and shall not be charged with the responsibility of preventing risk to Consultant or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors.
15. INDEMNITY AND LITIGATION COSTS:
Consultant shall protect, hold free and harmless, defend and indemnify the City, its consultants, and each of their officers, employees and agents, from any and all liability, penalties, costs, losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims or judgments, including attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its employees or anyone else employed by the Consultant in the performance of professional design services under this agreement, to the extent of the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.
To the extent permitted by Civil Code section 2782.8, for all other claims unrelated to the provision of professional design services, the Consultant shall protect, hold free and harmless, defend and indemnify the City, its consultants, and each of their officers, employees and agents, from any and all liability, penalties, costs, losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims or judgments, including attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation, which arise out of or are in any way connected with the Consultant’s, or its subcontractors’ or suppliers’, performance under this agreement or failure to comply with any of the obligations contained in the agreement. This indemnity shall imply no reciprocal right of the Consultant in any action on the agreement pursuant to California Civil Code section 1717 or section 1717.5. To the fullest extent legally permissible, this indemnity, defense and hold harmless agreement by the Consultant shall apply to any and all acts or omissions unrelated to the provision of professional design services, whether active or passive, on the part of the Consultant or its agents, employees, representatives, or subcontractor’s agents, employees and representatives, resulting in claim or liability, irrespective of whether or not any acts or omissions of the parties to be indemnified hereunder may also have been a contributing factor to the liability, except such loss or damage which was caused by the active negligence, the sole negligence, or the willful misconduct of the City.
16. CONSULTANT TO PROVIDE INSURANCE:
A. Consultant shall not commence any work before obtaining, and shall maintain in force at all times during the duration and performance of this Contract, the policies of insurance specified in this Section. Such insurance must have the approval of the City as to limit, form, and amount, and shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A VII (an NR rating is acceptable for Worker’s Compensation insurance written with the State Compensation Insurance Fund of California).
B. Prior to execution of this Contract and prior to commencement of any work, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and copies of endorsements providing evidence of coverage for all policies required by the Contract. The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall, at their expense, maintain in effect at all times during the performance of work under the Contract not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policy satisfactory to the City. The maintenance by Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors of the following coverage and limits of insurance is a material element of this Contract. The failure of Consultant or of any of its contractors or subcontractors to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence 135
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CDD25-229 Travel Model TIF VMT Project
Expires on 12/31/2027
7 11/4/24
of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of this Contract. Approval of the insurance by the City shall not relieve or decrease any liability of Consultant.
1. Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance
a. Worker’s Compensation - Insurance to protect the Consultant, its contractors and subcontractors from all claims under Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Acts, including Longshoremen’s and Harbor Worker’s Act (“Acts”), if applicable. Such coverage shall be maintained, in type and amount, in strict compliance with all applicable state and Federal statutes and regulations.
The Consultant shall execute a certificate in compliance with Labor Code Section 1861, on the form provided in the Contract Documents.
b. Consultant shall provide a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant.
2. Commercial General Liability Insurance
a. The insurance shall be provided on form CG0001, or it’s equivalent, and shall include coverage for claims for bodily injury or property damage arising out of premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual liability, and subconsultant’s work and personal and advertising injury resulting from actions, failures to act, or operations of the insured, or by its employees or agents, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the insured. The amount of insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general and products/completed operations aggregates. b. The commercial general liability insurance shall also include the following:
i. Endorsement equivalent to CG 2010 0714 naming the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds. The endorsement shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
ii. Endorsement stating insurance provided to the City shall be primary as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and any insurance or self insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it, to the payment or satisfaction of any defense expenses, loss, or judgment.
iii. Provision or endorsement stating that the Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
3. Commercial Automobile Insurance
136
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CDD25-229 Travel Model TIF VMT Project
Expires on 12/31/2027
8 11/4/24
a. The insurance shall include, but shall not be limited to, coverage for claims for bodily injury or property damage for owned, non-owned, and hired automobiles resulting from actions, failures to act, or operations of the insured, or by its employees or agents, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the insured. The amount of insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per accident.
b. The commercial automobile insurance shall include the same endorsements required for the commercial general liability policy (see Section
16.B.2.b).
4. Professional Liability. The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall secure and maintain in full force, during the term of this Contract and for five years thereafter, professional liability insurance policies appropriate to the respective professions and the work to be performed as specified in this Contract. The limits of such professional liability insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,00 per claim.
C. In addition to any other remedy the City may have, if Consultant fails to maintain the insurance coverage as required in this Section, the City may obtain such insurance coverage as is not being maintained, in form and amount substantially the same as is required herein, and the City may deduct the cost of such insurance from any amounts due or which may become due Consultant under this Contract.
D. No policy required by this Contract shall be suspended, cancelled, terminated by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits unless Consultant has provided thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City.
E. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions in excess of $10,000 must be declared to, and approved by, the City.
F. The requirement as to types, limits, and the City’s approval of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant are not intended to, and shall not in any manner, limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations assumed by Consultant under the Contract.
17. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS:
A. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of, shall observe and comply with, and shall cause any and all persons, firms or corporations employed by it or under its control to observe and comply with, applicable federal, state, county and municipal laws, ordinances, regulations, orders and decrees which in any manner affect those engaged or employed on the work described by this Contract or the materials used or which in any way affect the conduct of the work.
B. Consultant shall not engage in unlawful employment discrimination. Such unlawful employment discrimination includes, but is not limited to, employment discrimination based upon a person’s race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, gender, citizenship, or sexual orientation.
C. This Contract is funded in part through grant funds received under the following grant: Caltrans Sustainable Communities Grant 2024-25 for Vehicle Miles Traveled Reduction 137
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CDD25-229 Travel Model TIF VMT Project
Expires on 12/31/2027
9 11/4/24
and Mitigation Fee Program, Agreement Number 74A1606, (the “Grant”), the terms of which are incorporated herein. Copies of the Grant and any related materials have been made available to Consultant, and Consultant shall ensure that its performance under this Contract, and that of any subcontractors, conforms to the requirements of the Grant. These requirements include, but are not necessarily limited to, compliance with the terms set forth in the Grant.
D. Consultant shall maintain and make available for inspection by the City and its auditors accurate records of all of its costs, disbursements and receipts with respect to any work under this Contract. Such inspections may be made during regular office hours at any time until six (6) months after the final payments under this Contract are made to the Consultant.
F. This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relative to the services specified herein and no modification hereof shall be effective unless and until such modification is evidenced by a writing signed by both parties to this Contract. There are no understandings, agreements, conditions, representations, warranties or promises, with respect to this Contract, except those contained in or referred to in the writing.
G. All notices that are required to be given by one party to the other under this Contract shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if delivered personally or enclosed in a properly addressed envelope and deposited in a United States Post Office for delivery by registered or certified mail addressed to the parties at the following addresses:
City: City of West Sacramento
Attn to: Jimmy Fong
1110 West Capitol Avenue, 2nd Floor
West Sacramento, CA 95691
[email protected]
Consultant:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Attn to: Michael Schmitt
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 300,
Sacramento, CA 95814
[email protected]
H. This Contract shall be interpreted and governed by the laws of the State of California.
I. Any action arising out of this Contract shall be brought and maintained in Yolo County California, regardless of where else venue may lie.
J. In any action brought by either party to enforce the terms of this Contract, each party shall be bear responsibility for its attorney’s fees and all costs regardless of whether one party is determined to be the prevailing party.
K. ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CONTRACT AND SIGNATURE. By electronically signing this document in electronic form, Parties agree that this Agreement may be transmitted and signed electronically by all Parties, and that such signatures shall have the same force and effect as original signatures, in accordance with California law and regulations, including but not limited to Civil Code Section 1633.7 [Signatures on following page] 138
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CDD25-229 Travel Model TIF VMT Project
Expires on 12/31/2027
10 11/4/24
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
By: __________________________
Amanda Berlin, Assistant City Manager
ATTEST:
By: _______________________
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: _______________________
Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
By: _________________________
Michael Schmitt, Senior Project Manager
139
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CDD25-229 Travel Model TIF VMT Project
Expires on 12/31/2027
EXHIBIT A
Consultant Scope of Work
140
Kimley-Horn Consultant Team
Scope of Work
For
Travel Demand Model Development,
Transportation Impact Fee Program,
VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program,
and Transportation Analysis Guidelines
City of West Sacramento
Community Development Department
1110 West Capitol Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
141
2 Table of Contents
Scope of Work ............................................................................................................................. 3 Project Management.................................................................................................................... 3 Task 1 – Travel Demand Model Update.......................................................................................... 4 Task 1.1 - Travel Demand Model Evaluation and Approach Recommendations ................... 4 Task 1.2 – Travel Demand Model Development.................................................................. 5 Task 1.3 – TREDLite VMT Customized for the City of West Sacramento ............................... 8 Task 2 – Transportation Impact Fee Program Update ..................................................................... 9 Task 2.2 – Transportation Impact Fee Program Approach and Assumptions........................ 9 Task 2.2 – Transportation Impact Fee Nexus Study...........................................................10 Task 3 – VMT Mitigation Program Study .......................................................................................14 Task 3.1 – VMT Existing Conditions and Best Practices Assessment ................................. 14 Task 3.2.1 – VMT Screening, Thresholds, and Analysis Methodology ................................. 15 Task 3.2.2 – Develop Project-Level VMT Reduction Strategies ..........................................16 Task 3.2.3 – Develop City-Wide VMT Reduction Strategies and Mitigation Fee Program .....16 Task 3.3 – VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program Implementation Guide ..................19 Task 4 – Transportation Analysis Guidelines ....................................................................20 Task 5 – Outreach ......................................................................................................................21 Task 5.1 & 5.2 – Stakeholder Meetings.............................................................................21 Task 5.2 & 5.3 – Public Outreach .....................................................................................22 Task 5.3 & 5.4 – City Council Review/Approval................................................................. 23 142
3 Scope of Work
The following is a list of tasks that are intended to be the responsibility of the Kimley-Horn team, referred to as “Consultant” in this document.
The “City” will refer to relevant City staff coordinating this project.
Project Management
Understanding that in accordance with Caltrans requirements, Project Management efforts may not be billed as a standalone task. Thus, The Kimley-Horn team will apply the cost of project management into each of the tasks outlined below. Project management efforts include project management meetings with City staff, responding to calls and e-mails, invoicing, and preparing forms to meet Caltrans Sustainable Communities Grant requirements.
The Kimley-Horn team will hold an in-person kick-off meeting with key City staff to discuss the goals of the project, agree on communications protocols and recurring meeting schedules, project management details, data needs, quality control/quality assurance, deliverable review expectations, and other relevant topics. We will provide the City with a summary of the kick-off meeting including notes of the meeting, items agreed to, and any action items.
Kimley-Horn’s project manager will communicate and coordinate in a timely manner all work and progress on the project with the City. We will prepare a project management plan that includes a detailed project schedule and budget, including all tasks described in this scope of work. The project schedule will include all activities (by work task), start dates, activity durations, product submittal dates, relationship amongst work tasks including critical path items and float time. The schedule will account for meeting with, and review by City of West Sacramento, and other stakeholders, as appropriate. The schedule will account for one (1) week of review by the City and two (2) weeks of review by other key study participants/stakeholders of all key deliverables. Should adjustments to the schedule be needed as the project progresses, the Kimley-Horn team will update the schedule accordingly.
The Kimley-Horn team will coordinate regular bi-weekly project management meetings as appropriate.
Kimley-Horn will submit separate monthly invoices for progress on tasks that fall within Budget A (Task 1, 2, 4, and portion of Task 5) and progress on tasks that fall within Budget B (Task 3 and portion of Task 5). Kimley-Horn will submit the monthly invoices to the City for approval and payment, and will include a summary of project budget activity-to-date and show costs against each major task and/or subtask as appropriate. Detail will include staff charges by subtask. Additionally, billing requirements for tasks that fall within Budget A and B are detailed as follows:
• All Outreach tasks are separated into subtasks for the portion billed to Budget A and Budget B. The allocation for outreach will be split evenly (50% to Budget A, 50% to Budget B). • Any software/licensing, travel/mileage, or outreach materials will be billed to Budget A. • All work on Budget A shall be completed by December 31, 2027. • All work on Budget B shall be completed by June 30, 2027, with invoices and billing completed in July 2027.
Monthly progress reports will be included with each monthly invoice. Progress reports shall include:
the status of work and budget by task; significant accomplishments; problems encountered and 143
4 potential solutions; decisions to be made by the City and/or other agencies; project schedule updates as needed; and work planned for the next month (by task and responsible parties).
Task Deliverables:
• Kick-off Meeting with Kimley-Horn - Agenda and Minutes • Kick-Off Meeting and Fact Sheet
• Project Management Plan (project schedule and budget) • Biweekly Project Management Meetings
• Meeting Minutes and Action List
• Monthly Invoices and Progress Reports
Task 1 – Travel Demand Model Update
Task 1.1 - Travel Demand Model Evaluation and Approach Recommendations The Kimley-Horn team will review the travel demand model options for additional model refinement, or suggest development of another travel demand model approach, that is able to meet the minimum requirements:
• Ability to prepare the nexus study and relevant output metrics for the Transportation Impact Fee Program and the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program tasks. • Ability to accurately summarize a variety of VMT metrics, including appropriate accounting of trips that enter or leave the
• City boundaries.
• Ability to efficiently analyze a variety of land use development scenarios, preferably with inputs consistent with development applications (e.g. square footage for residential and non- residential), including a City buildout scenario that includes development capacity for master plan developments, infill, and accessory dwelling units (ADU). • Ability to analyze and summarize vehicle trips by vehicle type (single occupant vehicles, highoccupancy vehicles 2-person, high occupancy vehicles 3+ persons, medium trucks, heavy trucks).
• Provide additional detail with Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) and roadway network, including detail for truck prohibitions.
The Kimley-Horn team will begin by reviewing the City’s current travel demand model and SACOG’s regional models to assess available options. The City’s existing model, updated in 2023, is a SACMET-based four-step model derived from SACOG’s trip-based platform. SACOG’s newer models, SACSIM19 and the upcoming SACSIM23, are activity-based models (ABMs) that simulate daily activity patterns and travel decisions for individual households and persons. Using the model requirements identified by the City as a guiding framework, our team will document the capabilities, data needs, and limitations of each model approach. Based on the needs assessment and a review of best practices, we will develop a recommended modeling approach that aligns with policy needs and supports the City’s future transportation analyses. The recommended approach will be documented in a technical memorandum and submitted to the City.
Task Deliverables
• Travel Demand Model Evaluation and Recommendation Memorandum 144
5 Task 1.2 – Travel Demand Model Development
After the City and Consultant agree on the recommended approach outlined in Task 1.1, the KimleyHorn team will proceed with the travel demand model development. This task includes:
• Data Collection, TAZ, and Roadway Network Refinements • Model Calibration, Validation, and Sensitivity Analysis • Development of Off-Model Adjustments
• Future Scenario Development
It is assumed that the City will provide recent roadway segment and intersection turning movement traffic counts conducted between 2022-2024 to the Kimley-Horn team. The City will also assist our team in providing existing land use inventories and confirming future scenario land use growth assumptions. The Kimley-Horn team may suggest additional data collection that may be needed or useful for model calibration and validation, including origin-destination data.
The Kimley-Horn team will prepare a memorandum documenting each element of the travel demand model development process for the City to review prior to proceeding to each next step. Following the completion of the Travel Demand Model Development process, the Consultant will compile the information from the memorandums in this task, along with any additional relevant information, into a Travel Demand Model Development Report.
Geographic Zone Refinement
The Kimley-Horn team will review the existing model zone structure and will coordinate with the City to refine TAZ boundaries where appropriate. In areas of new or anticipated development, the need to split existing TAZs will be evaluated collaboratively (e.g., riverfront and bridge districts). A refined TAZ shapefile will be created for the City, ensuring that the new internal zones nest within the original regional TAZs. This nesting maintains compatibility and consistency with SACOG’s regional zone system. Special generators or activity centers (e.g., the Port of West Sacramento, Capitol Mall) will be added as needed to accurately reflect travel demand.
In parallel, a parcel-level land use database will be developed for the base year. The SACSIM model relies on a detailed parcel file, where each record represents a single parcel. This file serves as the key land use input to the new model. Zonal totals will be matched to City-established control totals to ensure consistency in socio-economic forecasts. Inconsistencies will be discussed and reconciled with City staff. The Parcel-Point DAYSIM file not only contains parcel-level attributes but also includes relative distance measures used to calculate accessibility between land uses. Our team is highly experienced in working with this methodology and recommends it due to its improved ability to model land use development changes
Network Attribute Review and Enhancement
The Kimley-Horn team will review the model network’s attribute data. This includes link characteristics such as type, directionality, lane count, capacity, length, design speed, and delay coefficients. Node attributes will also be assessed, including intersection types, node capacities, special delay conditions, and turn penalties. All attributes will be reviewed for consistency with current coding standards. Our team will incorporate any missing or newly completed roadways in West Sacramento into the select model. Specifically, connector roadways and connector will be reviewed and added as needed. Also, Enterprise Bridge is a key but constrained link between West Sacramento and downtown Sacramento and poses several modeling challenges. Its limited 145
6 redundancy makes it highly sensitive in assignment models, with small input changes leading to large shifts in bridge volumes.
We will flag links through residential or restricted areas to ensure that truck trip assignments reflect actual route limitations. For the transit network, the Kimley-Horn team will integrate all applicable routes serving West Sacramento, including Yolobus, SacRT, and future modes. Transit access links, such as pedestrian paths to stops and park-and-ride lot connectors, will be reviewed and enhanced.
We will run these improved networks through the existing model to ensure their correctness.
Running the network modeling procedures with the draft networks is the best way to find and fix issues, and doing this before additional downstream tasks is recommended.
Model Calibration, Validation, and Sensitivity Analysis As part of the model calibration process, the Kimley-Horn team will refine key parameters as needed to ensure accurate local performance. Potential calibration adjustments may include:
• Refining trip generation rates or person activity rates to special generators. • Calibrating factors to better match estimated traffic flows to expected district to district flows such as West Sacramento and downtown Sacramento
• Internal/ External distribution based on observed data, California statewide model or “bigdata” source • Adjusting mode choice parameters to include vehicles classes, improved nonmotorized travel based on available local information.
• Network capacity and BPR curves based observed counts and delay information.
Our team will also calibrate external trips—trips that cross the City’s boundary. Using recent traffic counts provided by the City on key gateway roads such as I-80, US-50, and Jefferson Boulevard where available, we will adjust the model’s external-internal and through-trip inputs to reflect actual traffic patterns. Origin-destination Big Data-based estimates using the Replica transportation analytics platform, at no additional cost to the City, will be used to further validate and scale the through trips compared to the local traffic volumes.
The Kimley-Horn team will conduct daily, AM peak, and PM peak validation for the updated model using standard practices consistent with FHWA and Caltrans Regional Transportation Plans (RTPs) travel forecasting guidelines. The static validation will include:
• Screenline Analysis
• Functional Class (Road Type) Validation
• Correlation Statistics
The recent traffic count data provided by the City (2022–2024), including roadway segment volumes and intersection turning movements, will be used for validating the model. The model network will be stratified by functional class, with an inventory of total links, links with available counts, and calculated percent error between observed and modeled volumes.
Validation targets will follow state guidelines, which require model volumes to fall within acceptable error margins by facility type. The goal is to meet or exceed a correlation of 0.88 between model estimates and observed counts. Additionally, 75% of daily link volumes should fall within the acceptable range on the FHWA correlation curve.
146
7 Off Model Adjustment
Following model calibration, the Kimley-Horn team, in collaboration with City staff, will develop any necessary off-model adjustments to account for factors not fully captured within the travel model.
These adjustments are typically used to address localized conditions or policy impacts beyond the model’s internal capabilities, such as parcel-level land use allocation tool or localized trip generation adjustments.
Future Scenario Development
The future year scenario will be developed using a parcel-level land use modeling approach within the SACSIM framework with a future year determined in consultation with City staff. Growth in housing and employment will be allocated at the parcel scale based on zoning, allowed densities, and development capacity informed by the City’s General Plan and specific area plans. To support this detailed allocation, the model will integrate multiple datasets, which may include Yolo County Assessor records (parcel use, lot size, and improvement values), the City’s zoning and land use GIS layers, specific plan documents, recent permit data, and development pipeline tracking. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) potential may be modeled explicitly by identifying eligible parcels and simulating additional units where policy allows. Commercial and industrial space will be estimated using square footage assumptions by land use type and distributed to parcels with entitlements or anticipated redevelopment.
The future year transportation network will be updated to reflect roadway and transit improvements planned and funded through the City’s CIP and consistent with SACOG’s 2050 MTP/SCS roadway network assumptions. The Kimley-Horn team will code committed network improvements affecting West Sacramento, including new roadways, interchange modifications, and regional projects such as the Yolo 80 Managed Lanes or other major corridor enhancements. On the transit side, updates may include expanded service frequencies, express routes, rail extensions, and the integration of new transit stations or park-and-ride lots. Transit accessibility links (e.g., pedestrian connectors and parking links) will be refined to reflect improved access and support accurate mode choice modeling. Walking and biking networks will be verified to ensure the model adequately supports nonmotorized travel forecasting.
Once the land use and network updates are complete, the model will be run for the 2050 scenario.
Outputs will be reviewed for reasonableness and compared to SACOG regional metrics to ensure alignment with SB 743 VMT reduction targets. Key outputs such as VMT per capita and roadway volumes on major corridors will be evaluated to confirm that model results reflect logical responses to land use and infrastructure changes.
The results of the 2050 model run will directly support the City’s TIF and VMT Mitigation Program. The 2050 model run will forecast travel demand on a facility-level basis, allowing identification of segments expected to exceed capacity, which will help prioritize projects for the City’s updated fee program. The model will also support a nexus analysis by identifying growth-driven travel patterns and future transportation needs.
Dynamic Validation
The Kimley-Horn team will conduct dynamic validation exercises to evaluate the model’s behavioral consistency and sensitivity to input changes. These tests help verify that the model responds logically in both magnitude and direction when land use or network variables are modified. Proposed tests may include:
147
8 • Adding and deleting links – Tests whether the model correctly reroutes traffic in response to network additions or removals
• Changing link speeds and capacities – Evaluates if the model reflects realistic changes in congestion and travel time under altered road conditions • Adding 100 or 1,000 households to a TAZ – Checks the model’s responsiveness to increased trip generation from residential growth in a specific zone. • Modifying employment levels at major activity centers – Validates how well the model redistributes work and non-work trips based on job density shifts • Coding a hypothetical bypass route – Assesses the model’s ability to simulate rerouted traffic and regional impacts from major new corridors
Model Enhancements
To further extend the utility and future-readiness of the City’s travel demand model, the Kimley-Horn team will incorporate functionality that supports anticipated planning needs, emergency preparedness, and emerging mobility trends. These enhancements would build on the sleeted modeling framework and may include:
• Sensitivity to changes in travel mode (walking, biking, transit), including presence of busrapid transit or light rail stations • Data and functionality to support emergency evacuation analyses (e.g., wildfire, flooding) • Ability to capture changes to local on-demand rideshare (Via West Sac) • Developing procedures to translate development project data into the parcel-level land use inputs required by the model
Task Deliverables
• Travel Model Data Collection, TAZ, and Roadway Network Memorandum • Travel Model Calibration and Validation Memorandum
• Off-Model Adjustments Memorandum
• Future Scenario Development Memorandum
• Travel Demand Model Development Report
Task 1.3 – TREDLite VMT Customized for the City of West Sacramento The Kimley-Horn team will provide a customized version of TREDLite VMT for the City, integrating the thresholds and screening criteria developed as a part of this task. TREDLite VMT is an online tool that allows users to quickly and easily screen projects, estimate VMT, assess project impacts, and evaluate mitigation strategies, including VMT banking and mitigation updates from the most recent version of CAPCOA’s VMT Reduction Handbook (October 2024).
Task Deliverables
• 2-year license for a customized version of TREDLite VMT for the City of West Sacramento • TREDLite VMT User Documentation
148
9 Task 2 – Transportation Impact Fee Program Update
Task 2.2 – Transportation Impact Fee Program Approach and Assumptions The Kimley-Horn team will review previously approved and other relevant documents related to the City’s Traffic Impact Fee Program, including the 2005 Traffic Impact Fee Program, 2010 Interim Traffic and Park Fee Update, 2006 Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, and the I-5 Subregional Corridor Mitigation Fee Program.
Our team will analyze best practices for a Transportation Impact Fee program (e.g., statutory requirements, legal requirements, and pending legal cases). This will include the recent Supreme Court of the United States’ ruling on Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California, Assembly Bill 602, Senate Bill 319; Assembly Bill 2553; and Assembly Bill 3177, all documents our team is already have previously reviewed and incorporated into fee program updates.
The Kimley-Horn team will propose a fee allocation methodology, including identifying how development projects would pay for the appropriate transportation impact fee, and which projects may have to pay a VMT mitigation fee. This step will coincide with the details outlined in Task 3.2.
This may include updates to the methodology for preforming necessary travel modeling, for calculating dwelling unit equivalents or redefining the appropriate fee structure for various residential and non-residential land use types and sizes pursuant to Assembly Bill 602 (e.g., ADUs, microunits, tiny homes), to reflect new land use categories not considered in the previous Traffic Impact Fee Program, and to reflect any changes in trip generation to various land use categories.
The Kimley-Horn team will review the list of transportation projects and policies outlined in the City’s current Capital Improvement Program, the City’s Mobility Element (adopted in January 2024), the City’s current and future update to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan, the West Sacramento Mobility Action Plan, the Sidewalks and Transportation Equity Program, the SACOG Metropolitan Transportation Plan.
The Kimley-Horn team will coordinate with City staff to identify any historical issues with the administration of the traffic fee program (i.e., inefficiencies or problematic processes). Our team will work with City staff to identify known deficiencies or concerns that can be addressed by this update.
The Kimley-Horn team will evaluate the fee methodology, structure, nexus, and overall effectiveness of the implementation of the current transportation related fees. For example, both the Bikeway Improvement Fee and the Street Maintenance Fee allocations are based on the SACSIM23 model trip purpose splits (residential vs. non-residential). Alternative approaches used in practice including the Asset-Based approach (based on historical funding levels) or isolating the percentage of person trips from the SACSIM23 model (for bikeways and sidewalks) may be examined.
Based on the recommended updates to the Transportation Impact Fee and VMT Reduction and Mitigation Program approach, the Kimley-Horn team will identify any environmental review necessary to implement the programs in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Our team will prepare a memorandum documenting the research, updated approach, and assumptions for the Transportation Impact Fee Program.
Task Deliverables
• Transportation Impact Fee Program Approach and Assumptions Memorandum 149
10 Task 2.2 – Transportation Impact Fee Nexus Study
The Kimley-Horn team will coordinate with the City for confirmation of the future land use development scenario for the purposes of the Transportation Impact Fee Nexus Study. We assume that the land use development scenario will match the future year developed for the City’s updated travel demand model as outlined in Task 1 but will confirm with the City before performing any analyses as a part of this task.
The Kimley-Horn team will coordinate with the City on identifying transportation improvement projects needed to accommodate the land use development scenario and for striving to maintain the City's General Plan Mobility Element policy goals for both VMT and LOS, which may include updates to the existing list of transportation projects identified in Task 2.1. Our team will also complete an analysis of the future land use scenario and associated transportation projects for VMT and LOS.
Land Use Assumptions
Given that the City’s updated travel demand model is based on a 2025 baseline year, the baseline year of 2025 will be considered for this fee update. Although selecting the most current year as baseline is typically desired, a baseline year gap of several years should not be considered problematic as development growth within that span can be easily tracked and accounted/controlled for using the City’s Land Use Development tracking.
The Kimley-Horn team will review the land use categories for which the fee will be calculated and make recommendations if these should be revised. Our team will also define the operative land use assumptions, such as persons per household and employees per square foot, to be used to forecast growth.
Once the land use categories and assumptions are defined, the Kimley-Horn team will prepare a growth forecast for each land use category. The City’s General Plan preferred land use forecast will serve as the foundation of this analysis. A key task will be addressing amendments to the General Plan or the zoning code that would allow different development types to develop specific areas that were not envisioned in the prior SACMET model development.
A key land use assumption during the model update phase is what land use assumptions are in developed for the non-City of West Sacramento modeling domain (other jurisdictions in the SACOG region). Land use assumptions outside of the City will have an effect on total travel demand and influence to varying degrees the traffic impact fair share estimates at specific locations/improvements. The Kimley-Horn team will coordinate with the City regarding the appropriate land use assumptions for non-West Sacramento areas within the modeling domain. By default, SACSIM23 reflects SACOG’s preferred Sustainable Communities Strategy preferred scenario from the 2025 Blueprint. As such, we recommend the use of SACOG’s 2050 land uses outside of the City of West Sacramento to provide needed consistency with the 2025 Blueprint.
Deficiency Analysis and Improvement Project Development The Kimley-Horn team will coordinate with City to perform the transportation analysis needed for the Traffic Impact Fee Program update.
The City’s updated travel demand model will provide the critical components of the Traffic Impact Fee Program nexus analysis, including defining the City’s roadway network; allocating travel demand among land uses and between new, existing, and external development; distinguishing between existing and future year deficiencies; and selecting capital improvements for fee funding. Although 150
11 traffic counts will determine existing/baseline operations for the fee update, the future year AM/PM peak-hour assignments as generated by the City’s updated travel demand model will be applied to generate the future year volume sets to determine future year operations using post-processed volumes based on traffic counts. It is assumed that the City’s 2022 – 2024 traffic counts will provide the necessary existing traffic volumes for the study facilities analyzed for this deficiency analysis.
Depending on what type of nexus the City would like to move forward with, the City’s updated travel demand model will be operative analysis tool to determine operational deficiencies (trip-based with VMT weights) or VMT reduction needs (VMT-based). For the trip-based nexus, land use projections and ITE’s (11th Edition) vehicle trip generation information will provide the basis for estimating the growth in EDUs. Use of VMT weights (i.e., application of average trip lengths by fee land use category) is recommended. The
VMT-based nexus will entail estimating the VMT increase associated with the City’s roadway infrastructure capacity expansion projects including the induced VMT component if deemed applicable (recommended approaches of the Rural Induced Demand Study will be considered), as well as land use growth.
The land use projections and ITE vehicle trip generation information will provide the basis for estimating the growth in Dwelling Unit Equivalents (DUEs). The percentage growth in DUEs can be considered by the City during updates to non-transportation impact fees (i.e., general public facilities, library, fire, parks, storm drain, etc., facilities).
For the trip-based transportation fee, the Kimley-Horn team will use City’s ADT Thresholds and Intersection LOS standards and design standards to define specific goals related to traffic levels and facility design within the City’s roadway network. Service and design standards will facilitate decisions regarding the type, location, and level of improvements needed to address identified deficiencies. They will also help allocate costs between new and existing development, an important determination, as improvements needed to correct existing deficiencies have different fair share requirements.
The Kimley-Horn team will review the City’s CIP projects list in the current program and update the list based on the analysis results and project status. DKS will propose the removal of any projects from the list that are no longer needed or already initiated/completed. Additional projects will be identified based on the multimodal infrastructure needs necessary to support future land use patterns in the city. For the VMT-based nexus, a more VMT neutral CIP list will be developed.
In addition, multimodal infrastructure needs (candidate projects to be funded by the program) may be identified in adopted planning documents including the City of West Sacramento’s Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan Update (2024), Sidewalks and Transportation Equity Program (2024) and Active Transportation Wayfinding Signage Program. The NCHRP 552 methodology will be applied to analyze the VMT reduction potential of pedestrian/bicycle improvements identified from these plans for inclusion into the fee program.
Improvement Cost Estimates
The Kimley-Horn team will prepare preliminary cost estimates for construction of the identified transportation improvement projects included in the Transportation Impact Fee Nexus Study. Our team will also coordinate with the City regarding the calculated percentage of funding provided through the Transportation Impact Fee versus other sources (e.g. Local Funding, Grants). 151
12 Updated improvement costs to previously identified improvements carried forward as part of this update will be based on percentage changes in the Engineering News-Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index. For the cost estimating of new or redefined improvements contained in City documents such as the Bicycle Master Plan, the Kimley-Horn team will incorporate planning level cost estimates developed by the City or its consultants.
The Kimley-Horn team will match the capital improvements described above with their anticipated or expected funding sources. Projects with designated funding sources will generally not be included in the calculations. Our team, in consultation with the City, will identify all other “discretionary” funding sources, including Federal, State, and local funds. Revenue information provided by the City as part of SACOG’s MTP/SCS financial constrained assessment will provide an obvious starting point for such an analysis. The total discretionary and non-discretionary funding amounts will be deducted from the total of the cost estimates to determine the net funding gap for purposes of the Traffic Impact Fee Program calculation.
Revenues already encumbered from the City’s current traffic impact fee program (i.e., fund balances) or developer contribution requirements will likely be considered part of the funding pool and will be deducted from updated total traffic impact fee program cost estimates. It will be necessary to avoid “double-charging” for individual improvement projects.
Improvement Cost Allocation
Using the City’s updated travel demand model, a select link analysis will be performed to quantify the amount of traffic associated with specific types and/or areas of growth in West Sacramento using each project location (i.e., traffic fair shares). This analysis will determine the proportion attributable to existing deficiencies and the portion to future growth. For the traffic impact fee, this calculation will be based on the service standards used for the deficiency analysis and trip generation (or VMT) estimates derived from the traffic model and demand projections. Only the portion of costs attributable to new growth within the City will be used to calculate the City’s new traffic impact fees.
The total cost of each infrastructure item will also be distributed among each of the land use types within the City’s fee program based on their relative demand for each improvement. The analysis will abide by legally defensible nexus standards per AB 1600. For the VMT-based nexus option, the cost per VMT will be estimated for each land use type in the City’s program. For each CIP improvement, this analysis will isolate trips associated with each fee benefit zone established by the City’s fee program. Our team will categorize the trips as either internal (i.e., start and end within the City boundary or I-I trips), trips with only one trip-end in the city (i.e., I-X and X-I trips), and pass-through trips (i.e., X-X trips) to ensure a proper accounting of fair share.
The Kimley-Horn team will reassess, and update if needed, the transportation impact fee district boundaries based on a combination of factors including the current fee district boundaries, potential transportation impacts based on VMT, and the types and location of transportation projects proposed.
Fee Calculation
Based on the cost allocation and growth assumptions described above, the Kimley-Horn team will develop a preliminary fee calculation for each land use. Specifically, the total improvement costs will be divided by the expected growth in each land use category. Our team will summarize the impact fees by area for each land use for review by City staff. This preliminary fee calculation is designed to elicit input regarding the amount, scope, and incidence of the fees calculated. 152
13 Per AB 602 (effective July 1, 2022), residential fees must now be expressed on a per square foot basis rather than by unit. In addition, SB 99 provides screening criteria for ADU housing developments. We will coordinate with the City to provide an analysis that is consistent with the legislative requirements of AB 602 and SB 99 as part of this traffic impact fee update.
The Kimley-Horn team will update the preliminary impact fee schedule based on the provided by the City. For example, the preliminary fee calculation methodology may be revised to incorporate changes in the amount, scope, or incidence of the fees.
A fee per trip will be developed in conjunction with a traditional fee schedule to address a-typical or non-traditional land use types (e.g., extraction- and recreation-related land uses). Determining a fee per trip cost will allow the City flexibility for applying an internally consistent but alternative fee type for those development applications that may not match the development type descriptions of the fee schedule – thereby reducing the likelihood of costly conflict resolutions.
Conflict Resolution Process Development and Cost Index Evaluation Given the recent Supreme Court ruling, a key takeaway is to ensure to include a conflict resolution process as part of a traffic fee program nexus report or fee ordinance. This will provide the City a formal process to resolve potential conflicts with applicants. The Kimley-Horn team will work with the City to develop this process
Given the recent volatility of construction related costs, the annual fee adjustment process will be examined. The Kimley-Horn team will evaluate various indices and floating average conventions used to adjust fees from year to year in other jurisdictions in the state for the City to consider.
Documentation
Based on the recommended nexus approach and establishment of a fee schedule, the Kimley-Horn team will prepare a technical report that documents assumptions, methodology, and study results applied to create the City’s Transportation Impact Fee. The report will clearly describe nexus findings and rationale consistent with AB 1600 and other legal requirements, including identifying the purpose of the fee, use of the fees and facilities financed, determination of the reasonable relationship between the fees use and the development project on which the fee is imposed, and identifying the reasonable relationship between the need for a public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is being imposed. The report will also identify the options for annual standardized cost escalations for construction of transportation projects.
Task Deliverables
• Land Use Assumptions for Nexus Analysis
• Deficiency Analysis Results Tables
• List of Improvement Projects
• Improvement Project Cost Estimates
• Fair Share Percentage Tables
• Draft Fee Schedule
• Final Fee Schedule
• Transportation Impact Nexus Study Report
• Conflict Resolution Process Development and Cost Index Evaluation 153
14 Task 3 – VMT Mitigation Program Study
Task 3.1 – VMT Existing Conditions and Best Practices Assessment The Kimley-Horn team will review on-going and approved planning documents, proposed developments, and transportation projects, in addition to the deliverables in related tasks. This may include:
• The City’s General Plan, especially the Land Use Element, Housing Element, and Mobility Element
• The City’s Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan (2035 update underway) • The City’s Mobility Action Plan
• The City’s Age-Friendly Action Plan
• The City’s Capital Improvement Program
• Transportation sections of Specific Plans, Master Plans, and other area plans as provided by City staff
• Existing Transportation Demand Management plans and requirements within the City of West Sacramento, to be provided by City staff
• Sacramento Area Council of Governments’ (SACOG) 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan / Sustainable Transportation Strategy (MTP/SCS) and/or the 2025 Blueprint (when released) • The I-5 Subregional Corridor Mitigation Fee Program
• The City’s Sidewalks and Transportation Equity Program Plan • The City’s Climate Action Plan (underway)
• Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Plan
• The City’s Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (underway) • US 50/BUS 80 Community Connectivity Project (underway) In addition to the above, The Kimley-Horn team will build on existing work it has completed for other jurisdictions, including the Transportation Authority of Marin (TAM), CVAG, the City of Riverside, Fresno COG, the County of Santa Cruz, and the City of Pasadena, to prepare a literature review. This will include reviewing the adopted programs and best practices of selected agencies (i.e., cities, counties, RTPAs/MPOs), VMT implementation tools and documents for jurisdictions in the SACOG region, white papers, implementation studies, case studies, new analysis methodologies from industry experts, and relevant organizations (e.g., ITE, ITS, APA, CAPCOA, OPR, CARB, etc.) involving VMT mitigation methods supporting the goals of SB 743. To date, we have already completed literature reviews of more than 30 different relevant documents.
The Kimley-Horn team will prepare a technical memorandum that summarizes the City’s existing transportation policies and programs, the City’s current practice to comply with SB 743, the City’s proposed development, the opportunities and challenges that the City currently faces in VMT analysis, reduction, and mitigation, and summary of the documents reviewed relating to VMT policy implementation and developing and implementing a VMT mitigation fee program. This memorandum will be used as the basis for the Executive Summary and Background for the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program Implementation Guide outlined in Task 3.5.
Task Deliverables
VMT Reduction and Mitigation Existing Conditions and Best Practices Assessment Memorandum 154
15 Task 3.2.1 – VMT Screening, Thresholds, and Analysis Methodology The Kimley-Horn team will work with City staff in the development of VMT screening criteria to determine whether certain types of development projects may be in low-VMT areas or presumed to not result in a significant transportation impact for CEQA (e.g., located in transit priority areas).
Projects that meet one or more of the criteria would not have to conduct detailed VMT analysis and would be exempt from the VMT Reduction Program.
The Kimley-Horn team will review existing screening criteria currently used by agencies within the SACOG region (e.g., Sacramento County) to presume less than significant impacts for developments meeting the criteria. In addition, we will identify other screening criteria used by jurisdictions throughout the state that may align with the City’s goals and priorities. As recent legal cases have required local data to substantiate the screening criteria used, The Kimley-Horn team will perform an analysis to determine the limit to be used for each criteria, such as building size or number of trips generated.
The Kimley-Horn team will also assist the City in developing the VMT analysis methodology and thresholds for what would constitute a significant transportation impact for CEQA. This would update or refine the City’s current methodology of using the SACOG VMT Hex Maps to determine if projects are located in an area that is 85% below the regional average for residential VMT or work tour VMT. This would apply to projects that are not screened out from the City’s VMT Screening Process resulting from efforts in this task, where detailed VMT analysis would need to be conducted.
This will involve utilizing the updated travel demand modeling established in Task 1, SACOG’s current travel model (SACSIM19 or SACSIM23), SACOG’s SB 743 Technical Implementation Tools and thresholds of significance for VMT, and the Office of Planning and Research and Air Resources Board threshold recommendations.
The Kimley-Horn team will review the VMT datasets from the City’s updated travel demand model, the current version of SACSIM, and the Replica transportation analytics platform and calculate baseline conditions for the City of West Sacramento. The baseline conditions calculated will serve to provide a comparison among the datasets to determine which provides the best representation of real-world conditions in the City, as well as which would be most advantageous to use for VMT policy setting and VMT reduction calculations based on the City’s priorities. We will present the results of the comparison to the City and recommend a dataset to be used to set VMT analysis thresholds. The Kimley-Horn team will meet with the City to discuss the datasets and our recommendation to determine which dataset the City would like to use to set VMT analysis policy and thresholds.
The Kimley-Horn team will use up to 3 previously approved development projects to perform case study analyses on the thresholds and screening criteria developed as a part of this task. The case study analysis will compare the results against the previously used criteria, where applicable, to compare how the project’s impact would change with the new thresholds, screening criteria, and selected dataset.
The VMT analysis methodology and thresholds would be incorporated into the update of the Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines in Task 4, which will address the key elements required for preparing and reviewing transportation analysis studies with respect to CEQA, and provide guidelines for documentation of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations required of a VMT analysis. A summary of the results of the efforts completed as a part of this task to establish a VMT 155
16 screening process, VMT impact thresholds, and a VMT analysis methodology, as well as the results of the case study analysis, will be summarized into a technical memorandum.
Task Deliverables
• VMT Screening Process and CEQA Transportation Impact (VMT) Analysis Methodology Memorandum
Task 3.2.2 – Develop Project-Level VMT Reduction Strategies The Kimley-Horn team will prepare a list of Project-Level VMT Reduction Strategies relevant to the City of West Sacramento. If projects are not screened out from the City’s VMT Screening Process established in the previous task, they would be required to conduct a VMT analysis consistent with the Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines and participate in the City’s VMT Reduction Program. The City’s VMT Reduction Program will require proposed land development projects to incorporate, as feasible, reasonable, and applicable, project-level VMT reduction strategies to reduce travel demand and associated adverse physical environmental impacts, such as greenhouse gas emissions and transportation-related noise.
The Kimley-Horn team will review the most recent CAPCOA VMT Reduction Handbook (October 2024) and other sources of VMT reduction strategies reviewed as a part of the literature review completed as a part of Task 3.1. The project-level VMT reduction strategies will include payment into a Mitigation Fee Program developed as a part of Task 4, as well as complement the VMT reduction actions pursued by the City in the Climate Action Plan, such as allocating funding to expand the active transportation and micro-mobility network. Enforcement for non-physical reduction strategies will include annual reporting to the City and requiring project applicants to make publicly available (i.e., permanent signage at the site or on a website) VMT reduction measure commitments.
The VMT Reduction Program developed will be flexible to allow other measures that reduce VMT to be approved by City staff on a case-by-case basis. We will develop a matrix that summarizes the project-level VMT reduction strategies and include it in a memorandum on how to implement the VMT Reduction Program in the City of West Sacramento.
Task Deliverables
• Project-Level VMT Reduction Strategies Matrix and Implementation Framework Memorandum
Task 3.2.3 – Develop City-Wide VMT Reduction Strategies and Mitigation Fee Program Developing VMT Reducing Projects
The Kimley-Horn team will develop a VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program through developing a list of City-Wide/City Implemented VMT reducing projects and programs. These projects would be entirely separate from the list of projects specified for the City’s Transportation Impact Fee Program (TIF Program), and focus instead on reducing City-wide VMT (e.g., implementing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, supporting transit, etc.). We will take into consideration projects, programs, and policies from the City’s planning documents to identify a list of City-wide or City implemented VMT reducing projects and programs to be funded by the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program.
Using the City’s planning documents will allow the City to reconfirm VMT mitigating projects that have been publicly vetted and will draw from policies, programs, and strategies that are compliant with regional and state goals.
156
17 The Kimley-Horn team will prepare preliminary, planning-level cost estimates for each of the selected City- wide/City Implemented VMT Reduction projects or programs to be included in the VMT Mitigation Fee Program or identify the unfunded costs of transportation improvement projects.
These planning-level estimates will be used in the development of the VMT mitigation fees. The cost estimates will include construction costs, land costs, and contingency or inflation assumptions with a total cost specified for each project. With the cost estimates, our team can then calculate a maximum VMT mitigation fee. With General Plan growth forecasts and the cost estimates, the Kimley-Horn team will evaluate different fee calculation options and recommend a preferred option based on staff and stakeholder input.
Establishing Project Selection Criteria
The Kimley-Horn team, in cooperation with City staff, will establish a list of VMT reducing project selection criteria and funding criteria based on the City’s goals such as equity, return on VMT investment, and other considerations that arise as part of the outreach.
Initial Project Selection and Modeling
The Kimley-Horn team, in cooperation with City staff, will select a draft list of VMT reducing projects that meet the legal and framework requirements. The projects selected will be modeled for VMT reductions and cost estimates will be prepared by the Kimley-Horn team.
Final Project Selection and Cost Estimating
The Kimley-Horn team, in cooperation with City staff, will finalize the list of VMT reducing projects and the resulting dollar amount per mile that would be required to buy a credit of VMT in the Mitigation Fee Program.
Development of Framework Options
The VMT Mitigation Framework describes the administration and approach for a VMT Mitigation Program. The City of West Sacramento may consider implementing both a VMT mitigation bank and exchange program or may take a hybrid approach. Before determining what approach is most appropriate, several questions regarding how to administer the program should be addressed. As part of this task, the Kimley-Horn team will evaluate the framework options for the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program including VMT banking, VMT exchanges, VMT mitigation impact fee programs, and Hybrid VMT mitigation programs.
Environmental Justice Evaluation
The Kimley-Horn team will design and apply an equity-based framework for the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program. As part of this framework, we will explore set-asides for equity priority areas to equitably distribute benefits of the program. The Kimley-Horn team will develop a Program framework that builds upon City-implemented equity frameworks. Our team will consider VMT mitigation measures that do not result in adverse impacts to underserved communities and/or how VMT mitigation measures can contribute to environmental equity, social equity, economic equity, and health equity.
The Kimley-Horn team will also consider community and stakeholder input in the development of the Equity-Based Framework. We will develop a matrix to distill the differences in frameworks for the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program (e.g., bank, exchange, or impact fee). Based on an 157
18 understanding of the fee structure needs, opportunities, and constraints, our team, in cooperation with City staff, will determine a fee structure for the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program.
The Kimley-Horn team will identify low-income and disadvantaged communities in the City of West Sacramento as defined by SB 535 and CalEnviroscreen 4.0, as well as local designations. The team will then determine where facility users are most likely to come from, and what proportion of those users are from disadvantaged communities. The team will then compare the proportion of disadvantaged users to the citywide proportions to evaluate the equity of proposed investments. The team will develop maps showing the disadvantaged communities and proposed project locations along with a table of proportional project benefits.
Select Mitigation Framework and Develop Mitigation Program Administrative Approach Based on a refined set of goals from the outreach conducted, the Kimley-Horn team, in cooperation with City staff, will select a draft mitigation framework: VMT bank, VMT exchange, both, or a hybrid approach. Once the overall framework is selected, our team, in cooperation with City staff, will define how the VMT Mitigation Program will:
• Be administered,
• How equity concerns will be addressed,
• How the bank will be financed,
• What procedures and criteria should be in place for project selection, and • How the City can monitor the effectiveness of projects implemented through the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program.
Finalize Mitigation Framework
The final framework for the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Program will be documented and posted for others to access. This will be the basis for moving forward in project selection.
If an impact fee program subject to AB1600 is proposed as the fee structure, the Kimley-Horn team will refine information from the previous subtasks with stakeholder and City staff feedback and prepare a nexus study of the proposed projects or programs to be funded by the fee. The nexus study will explain the purpose of the VMT mitigation fee, provide sufficient information and the necessary findings to determine the appropriate fees, and include calculations that demonstrate the legal nexus between the recommended fees and the impact created by new development. Our team will review other jurisdictions with VMT mitigation fees to confirm whether the City’s proposed fee is in line with those charged in example communities and to address the potential consequences should the fee significantly differ from adopted VMT mitigation fees. We will also consider the implications implementing a VMT mitigation fee program, as an element of all other development fees including the update to the City’s Traffic Impact Fee, on the prospects and viability of new development.
Case Studies
The Kimley-Horn team will prepare three (3) case study scenarios for projects that would utilize the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program. Our team will consider projects that are currently under review by the City. The Kimley-Horn team will use TREDLite VMT as a part of the case study evaluation. TREDLite VMT already has a fully functioning VMT banking analysis tool that we will use to test various hypothetical or existing projects with VMT mitigation needs to understand the realworld implications of VMT “credit” pricing. These analyses will help evaluate the overall program feasibility and the impact that various candidate banking projects return on investment (ROI) may have on VMT mitigation costs. This tool will also be invaluable to discussions regarding the 158
19 limitations of feasible mitigation depending on the outcome of the analysis. Our team will summarize all the details of the City-wide VMT Reduction Strategies and Mitigation Fee Program into a technical memorandum.
Task Deliverables
• Project selection criteria
• Draft project list, map showing DAC communities and project locations, documented VMT reductions from projects, and draft cost estimates
• Final project list and criteria/phasing for project funding • Environmental Justice evaluation
• Mitigation framework selection and draft administrative approach • Draft VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program framework selection • Final VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program framework selection • Results of three (3) case studies, including details with using the City of West Sacramento’s customized TREDLite VMT tool.
• City-wide/City Implemented VMT Reduction Strategies and Mitigation Fee Program Memorandum
Task 3.3 – VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program Implementation Guide The Kimley-Horn team will pull together all of the information from the VMT tasks and take the final steps necessary to provide the City with a complete VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program Implementation Guide. We understand that the City does not anticipate the Implementation Guide will receive public review, but will seek stakeholder technical assistance and review of the Implementation Guide. Otherwise, our team, in cooperation with the City, will incorporate public feedback in the selection of projects and programs identified for the VMT Reduction Program and to be funded by the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program.
The Kimley-Horn team will develop a VMT analysis guide that may include flowcharts, tables, matrices, maps, or other illustrations that will help developers understand what is needed to perform a VMT analysis for their project. The guide will describe the VMT analysis process for an applicant and direct them to relevant resources (such as the Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines and Traffic Impact Fee Program) and point of contacts within the City for their development proposal review.
Based on the VMT mitigation fee strategy and the projects proposed to be funded by the VMT mitigation fee, the Kimley-Horn team will identify any environmental review necessary to implement the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program in compliance with the CEQA. Similar to the environmental document completed for the I-5 Subregional Corridor Mitigation Program, if the projects and programs for the VMT Mitigation Fee Program are identified in the City’s General Plan, our team understands that City staff anticipates that the CEQA procedure may utilize CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 with preparation of a technical memorandum analyzing how this effort is within the scope of the General Plan EIR.
The Kimley-Horn team will provide a matrix of actions, responsible parties, and estimated time frames for the City to adopt the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program. Draft administrative documents such as draft ordinances, resolutions, and notices that will be necessary to implement the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program into the updates to the Traffic Impact Fee Program and the Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. If a project or program that involves another agency is selected as part of the VMT reducing project and programs funded by the VMT mitigation fee, our 159
20 team will prepare a draft or template memorandum of understanding. If the fee program is subject to AB 1600, the Kimley-Horn team will develop a sample Development Impact Fee Annual Report.
Task Deliverables
• Draft and Final VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program Implementation Guide that includes a summary of next steps towards implementation, credits FHWA, FTA, and/or Caltrans on the cover or title page, submitted to Caltrans in an ADA accessible electronic copy.
• Draft administrative documents necessary to implement the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program
• Draft memorandum for alternative VMT reduction programs (if applicable) Task 4 – Transportation Analysis Guidelines
The Kimley-Horn team will review examples for best practices with current transportation analysis guidelines details and requirements for local jurisdictions. The updated Transportation Analysis Guidelines will incorporate the VMT screening and VMT analysis methodology outlined in Task 3.
Additionally, the Transportation Analysis Guidelines will identify when specific transportation analyses are required, such as preparation of a Local Transportation Analysis (LTA) to continue analyzing LOS for General Plan Mobility Element consistency. This information will be helpful to decision makers and the public, and will assist staff in understanding what types of improvements should be considered as a Condition of Approval for a project. Finally, the updated Transportation Analysis Guidelines will incorporate the latest regulations, standards, and best practices from other guidelines we have developed in the region and throughout California.
The Kimley-Horn team will collaborate with City staff to develop updated sections of the TIA guidelines for the LTA/operations components of project traffic analyses. These sections may include the following:
• Scope of study and report elements (e.g., trip generation and distribution, level of service, off-site queuing, on-site circulation, throat depth, pedestrian/bicycle recommendations using City’s Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines. truck turning templates, ADT to size roads, and improvement recommendations)
• Study scenario selection
• Methodologies for completing operational analysis components (i.e., schools, queues, and projects with intense drive-thru traffic needing a queuing management plan) o Methodologies will include the assumptions for analyzing signalized intersections (e.g., PHF, truck percentage, yellow intervals, pedestrian timing, and signal optimization), unsignalized intersections, and roadway segments • Criteria for determining when the use of SimTraffic or VISSIM is called for • Identification of on-site and off-site deficiencies
• Outlining deficiency thresholds
• Providing a methodology to develop recommendations for eliminating deficiencies • Providing a methodology for determining when recommended improvements are needed (i.e., trigger analysis, cost sharing/fair share, and phasing of improvements) • Criteria for determining significant impacts for analyses intended to be incorporated into a CEQA document such as an EIR. This includes VMT, bicycles, pedestrians, transit, freeway facilities, and construction
160
21 The Kimley-Horn team will document the updated transportation analysis guidelines within a technical report.
Task Deliverables
• Transportation Analysis Guidelines Report
Task 5 – Outreach
Task 5.1 & 5.2 – Stakeholder Meetings
All stakeholder meetings throughout the project and for monthly invoicing will be split evenly between Task 5.1 (billed to Budget A), and Task 5.2 (billed to Budget B).
As noted by the City, the Kimley-Horn team assumes that this project will primarily rely on internal departments, legal counsel, and other government agencies for their technical expertise to develop all of the documents and programs that are legally defensible and aligns with local, regional and state goals. The Kimley-Horn team will meet with internal and external stakeholders as identified by the City and may include:
General Public Outreach
• Residents and Workers
• Community Based Organizations (CBO) / Non-Profits
• West Sacramento Chamber of Commerce
External Partner Stakeholders
• California Department of Transportation District 3
• Sacramento Area Council of Governments
• Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District
• Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District • Yolo County
• Yolo County Transportation District
• Washington Unified School District
Internal Stakeholders
• Capital Projects Department
• Community Development Department (CDD)
• Public Works Department
• Finance Department
• Economic Development & Housing Department (EDH)
• City Manager’s Office
• City Attorney’s Office
The Kimley-Horn team will meet with these stakeholders so they can provide technical expertise in reviewing and validating assumptions and methodology, as well as provide insight on projects or programs within the City that the City can contribute funds towards when they are collected from the fee programs. These stakeholders can also provide recommendations for the equity-based framework.
161
22 The Kimley-Horn team will prepare material and lead up to eight (8) meetings to provide updates and presentations of the project at key decision points to the Internal Project Team. Draft material and presentation material, if available, will be provided to the City for review and comment. It is assumed that the majority of these meetings will be virtual.
The Consultant will lead up to six (6) eternal stakeholder interviews. The external stakeholders will be invited to review draft material, participate in engagement activities, and provide feedback through focus group interviews. These may be group or one-on-one interview depending on the technical assistance needed for the development of the Transportation Impact Fee and VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Programs. Interviews may also involve CBOs in the development of the Equity-Based Framework. Draft material and presentation material, if available, will be provided to the City for review and comment. It is assumed that these meetings will be virtual.
The Kimley-Horn team will present the draft Transportation Impact Fee Nexus Study, the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program Implementation Guide, and other relevant documents at up to four (4) external stakeholder meetings. This may involve the West Sacramento Chamber of Commerce, Sacramento Valley Small Business Development Center, and CBOs. The comments from the external stakeholder meetings should be considered for update into the final version of each document. It is assumed that these meetings will be a mix of virtual and in-person meetings.
Task Deliverables
• Up to eight (8) Internal Project Team Meetings - Agendas, meeting notes, list of attendees • Up to six (6) External Stakeholder Interviews - Agendas, meeting notes, list of attendees • Up to four (4) External Stakeholder Meetings - Agendas, meeting notes, list of attendees • Technical Stakeholder Comments for draft Transportation Impact Fee Program, VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program Implementation Guide, and other relevant documents
Task 5.2 & 5.3 – Public Outreach
The Kimley-Horn team will prepare a one-page fact sheet that explains VMT and why the City is preparing an update to the Transportation Impact Fee Program and developing the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program. The Fact Sheet will be developed as a one-page document that can provide elected officials, community-based organizations, and the general public with high level information regarding the Transportation Impact Fee and VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Programs. As such, the Fact Sheet will use non-technical language to ensure it can be understood by the general public. The Kimley-Horn team will provide the Fact Sheet in English, Spanish, and Russian.
The Kimley-Horn team will develop an Outreach and Engagement Plan consistent with the tasks in this Scope of Work. The Outreach and Engagement Plan will identify specific outreach and engagement activities identified in Task 5.1; communities and/or groups to reach out to; and the schedule for outreach activities in relation to review or decision points in the project schedule, inclusive of lead time to publicize events. The activities called out in the outreach plan will be held in different formats, as well as different times and days of the week to include as many people as possible. This may include pop-ups events at daily destinations or local events, workshops in person and online, community forums, a citizen advisory group, a project website, a community survey, and mixed-media approaches to reach across various groups. The activities included in the outreach plan will take into consideration equity both in formatting activities and structuring activities for feedback on the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program’s equity-based framework. 162
23 The outreach plan will take into consideration the role of community-based organizations (CBOs) – opportunities for CBOs to provide feedback on the project (further detailed in Task 4), distribute promotional material to their network, host community events where the Consultant can seek community feedback, etc. The Kimley-Horn team will develop promotional material, meeting handouts, and presentation materials as deemed appropriate for the outreach events. Our team will be responsible for leading outreach and engagement activities as agreed upon in the Outreach and Engagement Plan.
Three large-scale public workshops will be held at key milestones in the project to encourage community-wide participation. These workshops will provide opportunities for the public to learn about the fee programs, review proposed projects and solutions, and offer feedback on priorities.
The Kimley-Horn team will work with the City to determine the best format for the workshops. This could include a presentation, live polling, interactive board displays, and feedback forms. The events will be held at accessible venues and scheduled at times convenient for community members to attend. Promotion for each event will include flyers, content for City newsletters, direct outreach to stakeholders, and social media posts and content. Interpretation services will be provided at all workshops, with materials available in English, Spanish, and Russian.
To reach community members where they are already gathering and provide additional engagement opportunities, the Kimley-Horn team will plan and attend six pop-up events throughout the City.
These could take place at high traffic areas such as grocery stores, parks, transit centers, farmer markets, and free community events. Each pop-up will feature printed outreach materials, interactive elements, and multilingual staff. The pop-ups will provide information about the programs and offer quick and easy ways for participants to give feedback.
All public engagement will be documented in an Outreach Summary Report. This report will include an overview of the strategies used, a timeline of activities, key themes from community engagement, and participation metrics such as attendance, survey responses, and social media reach. Key findings and themes will be included to provide an overview of the community’s perspectives on potential improvements and which projects should be prioritized. The summary report will also demonstrate how the public’s feedback informed the development of the Transportation Impact Fee Program update and the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program.
Task Deliverables
• Fact Sheet for the Transportation Impact Fee and VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program, including its relationship to the General Plan • Outreach and Engagement Plan
• Outreach and Engagement Summary Report
Task 5.3 & 5.4 – City Council Review/Approval
The Kimley-Horn team will present findings and recommendations of the Transportation Impact Fee Program and the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program Implementation Guide in person to the City Council. Our team will provide in-person attendance at up to three (3) public meetings for technical support. These meetings may include the Transportation, Mobility & Infrastructure Commission (TMI), Planning Commission, and City Council. The Kimley-Horn team will assist the City in preparing the agenda report for Commission and City Council review up to the budget allocated for this task.
163
24 Task Deliverables
• Commission Agenda, Agenda Report, and presentation materials if program is presented to Commission
• City Council Agenda, Agenda Report, and presentation materials 164
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CDD25-229 Travel Model TIF VMT Project
Expires on 12/31/2027
EXHIBIT B
Schedule of Performance
Contract Start Date August 20, 2025
VMT Mitigation Program Tasks (Budget B)
Tasks 3 and portion of Task 5 as identified in
Scope of Work, subject to the conditions for
Caltrans Sustainable Communities Grant
detailed in the contract Paragraph 17.C
June 30, 2027
Contract End Date
Includes all Remaining Tasks (Budget A)
Tasks 1, 2, 4, and portion of Task 5 as
identified in Scope of Work.
December 31, 2027
165
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CDD25-229 Travel Model TIF VMT Project
Expires on 12/31/2027
EXHIBIT C
Schedule of Fees
166
City of West Sacramento
Travel Model, TIF, VMT Project
Fee Schedule
Overall
Project
Task #
Budget A
(CIP) or
Budget B
(VMT Grant)
VMT
Caltrans
Grant Task
# Task Title
Staff Name Mike Schmitt Matt Weir
Sr.
Professional Professional II Professional I Analyst II Analyst I Support Staff Subtotal
Hours Subtotal Cost
Staff Title
Project
Manager
Principal-inCharge
Final Billing Rate 352.35 349.93 412.28 283.64 227.81 184.57 148.67 126.85 Task 1: Travel Demand Model Update 8 1 8 24 20 56 0 2 119 $ 28,420.15
1.1 Budget A Travel Demand Model Evaluation and Approach Recommendations 44 2 10 $ 2,797.66
1.2 Budget A
Travel Demand Model Development, and Dynamic Validation & Model Enhancements 4 1 4124160 0 41 $ 10,676.49
1.3 Budget A TREDLite VMT Customized for the City of West Sacramento 4 8 16 40 68 $ 14,946.00 Task 2: Transportation Impact Fee Program Update 16 2 4 32 16 56 2 2 130 $ 31,594.98
2.1 Budget A Transportation Impact Fee Program Approach and Assumptions 48 12 $ 3,678.52
2.2 Budget A
Transportation Impact Nexus Fee Study, and Conflict Resoluation Process Development and Cost Index Evaluation 12 2 4 24 16 56 2 2 118 $ 27,916.46 Task 3: VMT Mitigation Program Study 76 2 14 196 224 528 280 8 1,328 $ 279,968.62
3.1 Budget B 1 VMT Existing Conditions and Best Practices Assessment 812 24 40 2 86 $ 16,852.66
3.2 Budget B 3
VMT Screening, Thresholds, and Analysis Methodology. Develop Project-Level VMT Reduction Strategies. Develop City-Wide VMT Reduction Strategies and Mitigation Fee Process and Program. Evaluating Program Feasibility using VMT Tool 60 2 12 144 184 424 200 4
1,030 $ 218,048.50
3.5 Budget B 5 VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program Implementation Guide 8 2 40 40 80 40 2 212 $ 45,067.46 Task 4: Transportation Analysis Guidelines 4 0 016024 40 6 90 $ 17,085.22
4.1 Budget A Transportation Analysis Guidelines 416 24 40 6 90 $ 17,085.22 Task 5: Outreach 26 2 22 16 0 0 0 14 80 $ 25,245.26
5.1 Budget A Stakeholder Meetings 60220002 12 $ 3,759.64
5.2 Budget B 4 Stakeholder Meetings 60220002 12 $ 3,759.64
5.3 Budget A Public Outreach 40820004 18 $ 5,782.32
5.4 Budget B 2 Public Outreach 40820004 18 $ 5,782.32
5.5 Budget A City Council Review/Approval 31140001 10 $ 3,080.67
5.6 Budget B 6 City Council Review/Approval 31140001 10 $ 3,080.67 Labor Total
Total Labor 130 7 48 284 260 664 322 32 1,747 $ 382,314.23 Materials/Software/Other
Budget A Outreach Materials $ 3,000.00Budget A Travel/Mileage $ 750.00 Budget A TREDLite VMT 2-year license (Software only) $ 25,000.00 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Prime Consultant)
167
City of West Sacramento
Travel Model, TIF, VMT Project
Fee Schedule
Overall
Project
Task #
Budget A
(CIP) or
Budget B
(VMT Grant)
VMT
Caltrans
Grant Task
# Task Title
Staff Name
Staff Title
Final Billing Rate
Task 1: Travel Demand Model Update
1.1 Budget A Travel Demand Model Evaluation and Approach Recommendations1.2 Budget A Travel Demand Model Development, and Dynamic Validation & Model Enhancements
1.3 Budget A TREDLite VMT Customized for the City of West Sacramento Task 2: Transportation Impact Fee Program Update
2.1 Budget A Transportation Impact Fee Program Approach and Assumptions
2.2 Budget A
Transportation Impact Nexus Fee Study, and Conflict Resoluation Process Development and Cost Index Evaluation Task 3: VMT Mitigation Program Study
3.1 Budget B 1 VMT Existing Conditions and Best Practices Assessment
3.2 Budget B 3
VMT Screening, Thresholds, and Analysis Methodology. Develop Project-Level VMT Reduction Strategies. Develop City-Wide VMT Reduction Strategies and Mitigation Fee Process and Program. Evaluating Program Feasibility using VMT Tool
3.5 Budget B 5 VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program Implementation Guide Task 4: Transportation Analysis Guidelines
4.1 Budget A Transportation Analysis Guidelines
Task 5: Outreach
5.1 Budget A Stakeholder Meetings5.2 Budget B 4 Stakeholder Meetings5.3 Budget A Public Outreach5.4 Budget B 2 Public Outreach5.5 Budget A City Council Review/Approval 5.6 Budget B 6 City Council Review/Approval Labor Total
Total Labor
Materials/Software/Other
Budget A Outreach MaterialsBudget A Travel/MileageBudget A TREDLite VMT 2-year license (Software only) Alice Chen
Jim
Damkowitch
Randy
Johnson Ben Stabler John Gibb
Udit
Molakatalla David Tokarski Sean Carney Connor Wolff Sylinda Villado Ryan Peterson Kendall Flint Elise Brocket Sheida
Carugati Liz Aguilar
Subtotal
Hours Subtotal Cost
DKS Principal
DKS Team
Lead Senior Advisor Senior Advisor
Senior
Advidor Modeling Lead
Senior
Transportatoi
n
Planner/Engin
eer
Transportatoi
n
Planner/Engin
eer
Transportatoi
n
Planner/Engin
eer
Transportatoi
n
Planner/Engin
eer GIS Specialist
Public Outreac
Task Lead
Outreach /
Translation
Outreach /
Translation
Project
Administrater
360.42 343.51 315.52 333.41 269.97 314.73 239.49 214.35 179.23 156.93 151.27 310.39 211.31 138.68 121.02 2 18052 48 72 0 0264 12 220 0 0 4 302 $ 112,872.36
0 4 0128 0 0 0 8120 0 0 0 0 20 $ 10,851.72
214040 40 72 0 02560 220 0 0 4 282 $ 102,020.64
0- $
12 30020 54 44 64 96 0108 200 0 0 4 228 $ 106,087.92
0 6 0 8308160 0248 0 0 0 0 32 $ 24,153.60
1224 0 1224364896 0 8412 0 0 0 4 196 $ 81,934.32
0 7 016 24 160 0800280 0 0 2 110 $ 38,070.09
0- $
0 3 012 24 160 0640240 0 0 0
88 $ 31,647.61
44 16 4 2 22 $ 6,422.48
000000000000000 0- $
0- $
9190 0 016 168 052014 72 40 22 208 $ 56,282.57
0- $ 0- $
4.5 7.50 0 0 8 8 0 0220 736 20 9 94 $ 25,727.11
4.5 7.50 0 0 8 8 0 0220 736 20 9 94 $ 25,727.11
020000040400002 10 $ 2,414.18
020000040400002 10 $ 2,414.18
23 74 0 88 126 148 80 104 344 172 70 14 72 40 32 848 $ 313,312.94 $ -$ -$ -
DKS (Subconsultant)
168
City of West Sacramento
Travel Model, TIF, VMT Project
Fee Schedule
Overall
Project
Task #
Budget A
(CIP) or
Budget B
(VMT Grant)
VMT
Caltrans
Grant Task
# Task Title
Staff Name Subtotal Hours Subtotal Cost Subtotal Hours Subtotal Cost Total Hours Total Cost Staff Title
Final Billing Rate
Task 1: Travel Demand Model Update 119 $ 28,420.15 302 $ 112,872.36 421 $ 141,292.51
1.1 Budget A Travel Demand Model Evaluation and Approach Recommendations 10 $ 2,797.66 20 $ 10,851.72 30 $ 13,649.38
1.2 Budget A
Travel Demand Model Development, and Dynamic Validation & Model Enhancements 41 $ 10,676.49 282 $ 102,020.64 323 $ 112,697.13
1.3 Budget A TREDLite VMT Customized for the City of West Sacramento 68 $ 14,946.00 0 $ - 68 $ 14,946.00 Task 2: Transportation Impact Fee Program Update 130 $ 31,594.98 228 $ 106,087.92 358 $ 137,682.90
2.1 Budget A Transportation Impact Fee Program Approach and Assumptions 12 $ 3,678.52 32 $ 24,153.60 44 $ 27,832.122.2 Budget A Transportation Impact Nexus Fee Study, and Conflict Resoluation Process Development and Cost Index Evaluation 118 $ 27,916.46 196 $ 81,934.32 314 $ 109,850.78 Task 3: VMT Mitigation Program Study 1,328 $ 279,968.62 110 $ 38,070.09 1,438 $ 318,038.71
3.1 Budget B 1 VMT Existing Conditions and Best Practices Assessment 86 $ 16,852.66 0 $ - 86 $ 16,852.66
3.2 Budget B 3
VMT Screening, Thresholds, and Analysis Methodology. Develop Project-Level VMT Reduction Strategies. Develop City-Wide VMT Reduction Strategies and Mitigation Fee Process and Program. Evaluating Program Feasibility using VMT Tool 1,030 $ 218,048.50 88 $ 31,647.61 1,118 $ 249,696.11
3.5 Budget B 5 VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program Implementation Guide 212 $ 45,067.46 22 $ 6,422.48 234 $ 51,489.94 Task 4: Transportation Analysis Guidelines 90 $ 17,085.22 0 $ - 90 $ 17,085.22
4.1 Budget A Transportation Analysis Guidelines 90 $ 17,085.22 0 $ - 90 $ 17,085.22 Task 5: Outreach 80 $ 25,245.26 208 $ 56,282.57 288 $ 81,527.83
5.1 Budget A Stakeholder Meetings 12 $ 3,759.64 0 $ - 12 $ 3,759.645.2 Budget B 4 Stakeholder Meetings 12 $ 3,759.64 0 $ - 12 $ 3,759.645.3 Budget A Public Outreach 18 $ 5,782.32 94 $ 25,727.11 112 $ 31,509.435.4 Budget B 2 Public Outreach 18 $ 5,782.32 94 $ 25,727.11 112 $ 31,509.435.5 Budget A City Council Review/Approval 10 $ 3,080.67 10 $ 2,414.18 20 $ 5,494.855.6 Budget B 6 City Council Review/Approval 10 $ 3,080.67 10 $ 2,414.18 20 $ 5,494.85 Labor Total
Total Labor 1,747 $ 382,314.23 848 $ 313,312.94 2,595 $ 695,627.17 Materials/Software/Other
Budget A Outreach Materials $ 3,000.00 $ - $ 3,000.00
Budget A Travel/Mileage $ 750.00 $ - $ 750.00
Budget A TREDLite VMT 2-year license (Software only) $ 25,000.00 $ - $ 25,000.00 Project Total
Total for Budget A (Travel Model, TIF, Analysis Guidelines, half of Outreach) $ 118,472.98 $ 247,101.57 $ 365,574.55 Total for Budget B (VMT Mitigation Program, half of Outreach) $ 292,591.25 $ 66,211.38 $ 358,802.63 Total Overall $ 411,064.23 $ 313,312.94 $ 724,377.17
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
(Prime Consultant) DKS (Subconsultant) All Consultant Team 169
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
CDD25-229 Travel Model TIF VMT Project
Expires on 12/31/2027
EXHIBIT D
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR CODE § 3700
[Labor Code § 1861]
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.
Kimley-Horn
By:
Michael Schmitt, Senior Project Manager
170
Attachment 2
RESOLUTION 25-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF $101,200 FROM THE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR THE TRAVEL MODEL, TIF, AND VMT ANALYSIS (CIP 11230, CIP 13005).
WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Program has allocated $541,904 for the Transportation Impact Fee Update (CIP 11230) from both Transportation Impact Fees and onetime General Fund; WHEREAS, the City of West Sacramento was awarded $354,120 in grant funding from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Sustainable Communities Grant Program to develop the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program; WHEREAS, the 2024/2025 Capital Improvement Program allocated $400,000 for the VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program development in anticipation of the grant award and including an 11.47% match of $45,880 from the Traffic Improvement Fund (CIP 13005); WHEREAS, the total remaining appropriations available for these two projects to complete for updates to the related transportation planning and analysis programs (Travel Demand Model, Transportation Impact Fee Program, VMT Reduction and Mitigation Fee Program, Transportation Analysis Guidelines, Emergency Evacuation Analysis currently is $813,339.51;
WHEREAS, a Request for Proposal for updates and development of these transportation planning and analysis programs was released on March 28, 2025; and WHEREAS, the staff is recommending City Council to award a contract for professional services with Kimley-Horn in the amount of $724,400; and WHEREAS, allocating and holding an additional 10% of the contract cost for unlikely unforeseen contingencies will ensure project completion; and WHEREAS, staff is proposing to transfer an additional $150,000 of Traffic Improvement Funds to fully fund the project, including staff time and cost allocation (ICAP); WHEREAS, there are sufficient funds available in the sources identified to fund the additional appropriations as requested for this project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all information related to this matter, as presented at the public meetings of the City Council identified herein, including any supporting reports by City staff, and any other information provided during public meetings.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento as follows:
1. The City Council hereby approves amendments to the budget for the 2025-26 fiscal year as provided below:
SOURCES
$150,000 205-0000-3060 Traffic Improvement Fund
$150,000 400-9900-4990/400-11230-4990 Transfer from Traffic Improvement Fund $150,000 Total Sources
USES
$150,000 400-9900-5530/400-11230-5800 TIF Update
$150,000 205-9211-5950 Transfer Out to TIF Update
$150,000 Total Uses
171
Resolution 25-85
*Note: Interfund transfers not included in total sources and uses.
2. The City Council hereby finds that the facts set forth in the recitals to this Resolution are true and correct and establish the factual basis for the City Council’s adoption of this Resolution.
3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the West Sacramento City Council this 20th day of August, 2025 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
172
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2025 ITEM # 6
SUBJECT:
CONSIDERATION OF THE TREASURER’S QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT ON THE CITY’S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2025 INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Marc Rotteveel, Senior Finance Analyst
Finance Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [X] Information [ ] Direction [ ] Action
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this report is to provide the City Council with the treasurer’s quarterly report on the City’s investment portfolio for the quarter ending June 30, 2025 as outlined by the Government Code 53646(b) (1).
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council receive and file the Treasurer’s Quarterly Financial Report on the City’s investment portfolio for the period ending June 30, 2025.
BACKGROUND
All local agencies are required to file regular financial reports with their legislative body on the status of their investment portfolio. One of the roles of the City’s Finance Department, is to manage investments of the City to ensure that cash flow needs are met while maximizing the investment portfolio.
The funds invested in the City’s treasury comprise pooled cash from all Funds in the City’s General Ledger, including funds held in Trust for other agencies (i.e., the Yolo-Sacramento Port District and West Sacramento Flood Control Agency (WSAFCA) JPA). City staff structure investment maturities in such a way to optimize return while ensuring enough liquid funds are available to meet the operating and capital needs of the City and agencies for which the City acts as Treasurer. The pooled cash also includes impact fee revenues collected from developers and set aside until sufficient funds are available to implement the capital projects for which they were collected, and reserve funds for budget stabilization to ensure fiscal stability of the City and its various services to the community.
It should be noted that the majority of the funds held in the City’s treasury are legally restricted and may only be used for the purposes for which they are collected. Moreover, the funds may only be invested in investments permitted by California Government Code 53600 (Code) et. al, and the City’s investment policy.
Under section 53646(b)(1) of the Government Code, the City Treasurer may prepare and transmit a quarterly financial report to the City Council on the City’s investment portfolio. This report includes:
1. The type of investment, issuer, date of maturity, and par and dollar amount invested on all securities, investments and funds held by the City;
2. A current market value as of the date of the report;
3. A stated compliance of the portfolio to the statement of the City’s adopted investment policy, or manner in which the portfolio is not in compliance; and
4. A statement denoting the ability of the local agency to meet its pool’s expenditure requirements for the next six months, or provide an explanation as to why sufficient money shall or may not be available. Once a year, the statement of investment policy is included in the report.
This quarterly report is produced in a format designed to provide stakeholders a broad profile of the City’s Investment Portfolio. While staff is only transmitting portions of the report with key investment results, a full report with additional detail is available upon request.
ANALYSIS
This quarterly financial update gives a snapshot of how the City’s pooled investment funds were doing as of June 30,2025. At the end of the quarter, the City had about $372.8 million in invested funds and the market value of those investments was about $374.6 million. This difference means that if the City were to sell those investments on the open market as of June 30, the City would receive $1.8 million more that was originally paid for these 173
Quarterly Treasurer’s Report Ending June 30, 2025
August 20, 2025
funds. On top of that, the City has earned around $1.6 million in interest that hasn’t yet been paid out. Book Value is what was paid for the investments, adjusted over time. Market Value is what the funds are worth today based on current interest rates and market demand. When interest rates go up, the market value of existing investments usually goes down, and vice versa.
Importantly, the City has cash available to pay its bills for the next six months and beyond. Two of the most flexible investment accounts in the City’s portfolio are LAIF (a State-run pool) and CAMP (another local government pool). These two accounts make up about 23% of the investment portfolio and can be accessed in just one day if needed. The City also had about $62.3 million in cash in its regular bank account as of June 30, which fluctuates based on day-to-day expenses.
The rest of the money is invested in a mix of safe, longer-term investments that follow strict rules set by state law and the City’s own policies. City staff and consultant keep a close eye on how these investments are spread out (by type, maturity date, and issuer), and make adjustments regularly to respond to changes in the market.
On average, investments are set to mature in about 676 days which is a little under two years.
The overall goal of the City’s investment approach is to keep tax dollars safe, accessible, and earning a reasonable return. City staff, together with the City’s investment adviser, keep a close watch on market trends and risks to make sure the portfolio stays strong.
City of West Sacramento Consolidated Sector Allocation
June 30, 2025 March 31, 2025
Agency
3.5%
Agency CMBS
6.9%
Asset Backed
Security
5.1%
Cash
19.0%
Corporate
15.3%
LAIF
22.7%
Local Gov
Investment
Pool
1.7%
Money
Market Fund
0.7%
Municipal
Bonds
0.7%
Supranational
3.1%
US Treasury
21.3%
Agency
2.8%
Agency CMBS
6.9%
Asset Backed
Security
6.2%
Cash
14.6%
Corporate
16.7%
LAIF
21.2%
Local Gov
Investment
Pool
1.6%
Money
Market Fund
2.9%
Municipal
Bonds
0.7%
Supranational
2.9%
US Treasury
23.5%
44.1%
1.5%
8.0%
12.1%
34.2%
47.5%
2.2%
8.7% 10.9%
30.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0-0.50 0.50-1 1-2 2-3 3-5
6/30/2025 3/31/2025
City of West Sacramento Consolidated Maturity Distribution 174
Quarterly Treasurer’s Report Ending June 30, 2025
August 20, 2025
As of June 30, 2025, the City’s main investment portfolio (not including cash, LAIF, or CAMP) had a duration of
2.5 years which is a measure of how sensitive the portfolio is to interest rate changes. This is right in line with the City’s performance benchmarks. The City has also continued to maintain a healthy balance by diversifying across different sectors, issuers, and timelines.
Discussion of Performance
The following is a summary of the City’s holdings by investment type, including each sector’s yield to maturity.
Yield to maturity measures the interest income the City is expected to earn for the coming 12 months, assuming nothing in the portfolio changes. As of June 30, 2025, the weighted average yield to maturity of the City’s consolidated investments was 3.68%:
Investment Type Par Value Market Value Book Value % of
Portfolio
Days to
Maturity
Yield to
Maturity
Agency $10,550,000.00 $10,496,174.92 $10,546,115.99 2.80% 373 1.54% Agency CMBS $26,771,048.91 $26,000,815.76 $25,677,080.98 6.94% 1,193 4.47% Asset Backed Security $23,048,210.24 $23,213,126.34 $23,037,960.30 6.20% 1,302 4.76% Cash $54,830,123.80 $54,830,123.80 $54,830,123.80 14.64% 1 1.26% Corporate $62,261,000.00 $62,580,037.11 $61,966,253.66 16.71% 1,225 4.32% LAIF $79,405,399.42 $79,405,399.42 $79,405,399.38 21.20% 1 4.27% Local Gov Investment Pool $5,914,550.51 $5,914,550.51 $5,910,550.51 1.58% 1 4.43% Money Market Fund $10,817,400.21 $10,817,400.21 $10,817,400.21 2.89% 1 4.21% Municipal Bonds $2,400,000.00 $2,442,588.01 $2,408,432.59 0.65% 1,492 4.41% Supranational $10,775,000.00 $10,703,781.33 $10,667,637.03 2.86% 953 2.94% US Treasury $87,880,000.00 $88,200,696.26 $87,494,972.00 23.55% 1,107 3.91% Grand Total $374,652,733.09 $374,604,693.67 $372,761,926.45 100% 676 3.68% The portfolio’s return comprises interest income as well as fair value appreciation, both of which are a function of movements in interest rates available in the capital markets. Interest income continues to be robust (the investment portfolio of securities is expected to earn was also 4.04% (purchase yield) for the next year (up from
3.41% last quarter; when LAIF, CAMP and cash are included the expected earnings are 3.68%). The City’s reinvestment yield (market yield) has been hovering in the 4.04% range as rates in the market have moved slightly lower. Staff continues to work closely with the City’s investment adviser to diversify the portfolio in order to improve safety, liquidity, and return. In the current quarter, staff will continue to evaluate liquidity needs and, where possible, continue the investment in longer-duration securities.
Economic Outlook
The economy is still growing in 2025, but more slowly, and there’s more uncertainty about what’s ahead as government spending and tax policies work their way through the system. Inflation has cooled down compared to before, but some prices are still stubbornly high and overall inflation is still above the Federal Reserve’s goal.
The job market is more balanced now but there are fewer new jobs being added and unemployment is still low.
Because of all this, the Fed is expected to slowly move interest rates back toward more normal levels, and longterm interest rates may start rising faster than short-term ones.
In June, the Fed decided to keep its main interest rate the same, between 4.25% and 4.50%. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said they’re taking a “wait and see” approach because, while uncertainty about the economy is still high, it’s not as bad as it was.
In the bond market, U.S. Treasury yields have moved higher. But something interesting is happening: the gap between short-term rates (like 2-year bonds) and long-term rates (like 10-year bonds) is narrowing. This usually signals that investors are bracing for slower growth ahead. As a result, more investors are buying long-term bonds as a safer bet given the uncertain outlook.
Environmental Considerations
Not Applicable
Commission Recommendation
Not applicable
175
Quarterly Treasurer’s Report Ending June 30, 2025
August 20, 2025
Strategic Plan Integration
The City’s mission includes a City Government that is Financially Sound, and the Council’s goal for achieving a Financially Sound City Government is furthered by investing the City treasury in a manner that ensures safety and liquidity first, and where possible a yield on “excess cash”. The preparation of regular quarterly reports on the City’s investments supports the mission and this goal.
Alternatives
Since this agenda report transmits a quarterly financial report pursuant to Government Code section 53646(b) (1), alternatives have not been presented.
Coordination and Review
Not applicable
Budget/Cost Impact
The investment portfolio, as a whole, earned returns at least consistent with the revenue estimates contained in the budget.
ATTACHMENT
1. Excerpts from Chandler Asset Management Investment Report (June 30, 2025) 176
CONFIDENTIAL | 2
City of West Sacramento Cons Portfolio | Account #10677 | As of June 30, 2025 Execution Time: 07/15/2025 02:34:10 PM Chandler Asset Management | [email protected] | www.chandlerasset.com | 800.317.4747
PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Portfolio Characteristics
Sector Allocation
Account Summary
Maturity Distribution
Top Issuers
Credit Quality (S&P)
Average Modified Duration 1.56
Average Coupon 3.48%
Average Purchase YTM 3.69%
Average Market YTM 3.69%
Average Credit Quality* AA+
Average Final Maturity 1.85
Average Life 1.61
End Values as of
05/31/2025
End Values as of
06/30/2025
Market Value 375,822,057.56 374,604,693.63
Accrued Interest 1,673,666.83 1,644,247.90
Total Market Value 377,495,724.39 376,248,941.53
Income Earned 526,702.10 966,949.10
Cont/WD 32,510,757.52 (3,412,436.12)
Par 376,824,524.72 374,652,733.09
Book Value 375,073,845.81 372,761,926.50
Cost Value 374,081,887.46 371,716,758.43
Government of The United States 23.55%
LAIF 21.20%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. 10.20%
FHLMC 6.94%
Money Market Fund 2.89%
International Bank for Recon and Dev 2.29%
California Asset Mgmt Program 1.58%
FNMA 1.15%
*The average credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch.
ATTACHMENT 1
177
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of West Sacramento Cons Portfolio | Account #10677 | As of June 30, 2025 Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes
AGENCY MORTGAGE SECURITIES (CMOS)
Max % (MV) 20.0 6.9 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 30.0 6.9 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 4.6 Compliant
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES (ABS)
Max % (MV) 20.0 6.2 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.4 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
BANKERS' ACCEPTANCES
Max % (MV) 40.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Days) 180 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT PLACEMENT SERVICE
(CDARS)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
COLLATERALIZED BANK DEPOSITS
Max % (MV) 100.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
COLLATERALIZED TIME DEPOSITS (NONNEGOTIABLE CD/TD)
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
COMMERCIAL PAPER
Max % (MV) 40.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Days) 270 0.0 Compliant
16 ATTACHMENT 1
178
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of West Sacramento Cons Portfolio | Account #10677 | As of June 30, 2025 Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
CORPORATE MEDIUM TERM NOTES
Max % (MV) 30.0 16.7 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 1.1 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
FDIC INSURED TIME DEPOSITS (NON-NEGOTIABLE
CD/TD)
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
FEDERAL AGENCIES
Max % (MV) 100.0 2.8 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 30.0 1.2 Compliant
Max Callables (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 2 Compliant
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF)
Max % (MV) 100.0 21.2 Compliant
MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS
Max % (MV) 20.0 2.9 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 20.0 2.9 Compliant
Min Rating (AAA by 2) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES, CMOS (NONAGENCY)
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES (CA, LOCAL AGENCY)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.7 Compliant
17 ATTACHMENT 1
179
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of West Sacramento Cons Portfolio | Account #10677 | As of June 30, 2025 Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.7 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES (CA, OTHER STATES)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
MUTUAL FUNDS
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 10.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (AAA by 2) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT (NCD)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1 if > FDIC Limit) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
SUPRANATIONAL OBLIGATIONS
Max % (MV) 30.0 2.9 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 10.0 2.3 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
U.S. TREASURIES
Max % (MV) 100.0 23.5 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
18 ATTACHMENT 1
180
PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2025 Benchmark* 6/30/2025
Portfolio
3/31/2025
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 2.65 2.96 3.01
Average Modified Duration 2.48 2.50 2.56
Average Purchase Yield 4.04% 3.95%
Average Market Yield 3.78% 4.04% 4.20%
Average Quality** AA+ AA+ AA+
Total Market Value 236,138,176 197,717,372
*Benchmark: ICE BofA 1-5 Year Unsubordinated US Treasury & Agency Index **The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. 19 ATTACHMENT 1
181
PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
City of West Sacramento Reporting Portfolio | Account #10676 | As of June 30, 2025 6/30/2025
Portfolio
3/31/2025
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 0.00 0.00
Average Modified Duration 0.00 0.00
Average Purchase Yield 3.11% 2.69%
Average Market Yield 3.09% 2.68%
Average Quality** AAA AAA
Total Market Value 140,110,765 150,043,575
*Benchmark: NO BENCHMARK REQUIRED
**The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. 29 ATTACHMENT 1
182
PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
City of West Sacramento Cons Portfolio | Account #10677 | As of June 30, 2025 6/30/2025
Portfolio
3/31/2025
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 1.85 1.71
Average Modified Duration 1.56 1.45
Average Purchase Yield 3.69% 3.41%
Average Market Yield 3.69% 3.54%
Average Quality** AA+ AA+
Total Market Value 376,353,843 347,864,766
*Benchmark: NO BENCHMARK REQUIRED
**The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. 31 ATTACHMENT 1
183
HOLDINGS REPORT
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2025 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt
Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
ABS
43815BAC4 HAROT 2022-1 A3 1.88
05/15/2026 34,256.43 02/15/20221.89%
34,251.28
34,255.46
99.80 4.77%
34,187.05
28.62 0.01%
(68.41)
Aaa/AAA
NA
0.87 0.07
05602RAD3 BMWOT 2022-A A3 3.21
08/25/2026 31,417.21 05/10/20223.63%
31,415.58
31,416.87
99.82 4.56%
31,360.48
16.81 0.01%
(56.39)
Aaa/AAA
NA
1.15 0.14
47787JAC2 JDOT 2022 A3 2.32 09/15/2026 44,522.58 03/10/2022
2.34%
44,512.73
44,520.12
99.72 4.16%
44,395.95
45.91 0.02%
(124.17)
Aaa/NA
AAA
1.21 0.15
362554AC1 GMCAR 2021-4 A3 0.68
09/16/2026 667.90 10/13/20210.68%
667.89
667.90
99.84 4.51%
666.85
0.19 0.00%
(1.05)
Aaa/AAA
NA
1.21 0.04
448977AD0 HART 2022-A A3 2.22 10/15/2026 49,915.35 03/09/2022
2.23%
49,913.43
49,914.86
99.83 4.49%
49,832.10
49.25 0.02%
(82.77)
NA/AAA
AAA
1.29 0.07
380146AC4 GMCAR 2022-1 A3 1.26
11/16/2026 6,927.67 01/11/20221.27%
6,927.06
6,927.52
99.86 4.72%
6,917.84
3.64 0.00%
(9.67)
NA/AAA
AAA
1.38 0.04
47800AAC4 JDOT 2022-B A3 3.74 02/16/2027 130,763.79 07/12/2022
3.77%
130,751.31
130,759.52
99.68 4.66%
130,340.50
217.36
0.06%
(419.02)
Aaa/NA
AAA
1.63 0.36
44934FAD7 HALST 2024-B A3 5.41 05/17/2027 495,000.00 05/14/2024
5.41%
494,986.24
494,991.35
100.79
4.55%
498,930.99
1,190.20
0.21%
3,939.64
NA/AAA
AAA
1.88 0.86
47800BAC2 JDOT 2022-C A3 5.09 06/15/2027 319,739.30 10/12/2022
3.29%
319,714.49
319,729.70
100.27
4.59%
320,597.19
723.32
0.14%
867.49
Aaa/NA
AAA
1.96 0.48
36269WAD1 GMALT 2024-2 A3 5.39
07/20/2027 460,000.00 05/07/20245.85%
459,973.27
459,982.74
100.80
4.38%
463,669.88
757.59
0.20%
3,687.14
NA/AAA
AAA
2.05 0.74
02582JJV3 AMXCA 2022-3 A 3.75 08/15/2025 1,000,000.00 11/03/2022
5.58%
960,000.00
997,548.30
99.90 4.61%
999,010.00
1,666.67
0.43%
1,461.70
Aaa/NA
AAA
0.13 0.12
58770JAD6 MBALT 2024-A A3 5.32
01/18/2028 335,000.00 05/17/20245.73%
334,960.81
334,972.67
101.22
4.38%
339,091.42
792.09
0.14%
4,118.75
Aaa/NA
AAA
2.55 1.22
44935WAD9 HALST 2025-A A3 4.83
01/18/2028 945,000.00 01/14/20254.83%
944,929.22
944,939.60
100.89
4.30%
953,408.70
2,028.60
0.41%
8,469.10
NA/AAA
AAA
2.55 1.52
44935DAD1 HALST 2025-B A3 4.53 04/17/2028 1,625,000.00 --
4.47%
1,626,662.31
1,626,563.41
100.69
4.19%
1,636,176.26
3,271.67
0.70%
9,612.85
NA/AAA
AAA
2.80 1.78
362962AD4 GMALT 2025-2 A3 4.58
05/22/2028 1,070,000.00 05/20/20254.84%
1,069,982.24
1,069,982.78
100.64
4.23%
1,076,833.34
1,497.41
0.46%
6,850.56
NA/AAA
AAA
2.90 1.62
161571HT4 CHAIT 2023-1 A 5.16 09/15/2028 1,350,000.00 09/07/2023
5.23%
1,349,625.78
1,349,759.94
101.16
4.21%
1,365,601.82
3,096.00
0.58%
15,841.87
NA/AAA
AAA
3.21 1.14
39 ATTACHMENT 1
184
HOLDINGS REPORT
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2025 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt
Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
437930AC4 HAROT 2024-2 A3 5.27
11/20/2028 435,000.00 05/14/20245.27%
434,947.15
434,960.20
101.20
4.30%
440,199.38
827.83
0.19%
5,239.18
NA/AAA
AAA
3.39 1.16
096919AD7 BMWOT 2024-A A3 5.18
02/26/2029 570,000.00 06/04/20245.18%
569,913.42
569,932.79
101.26
4.11%
577,186.56
492.10
0.25%
7,253.77
Aaa/AAA
NA
3.66 1.12
43813YAC6 HAROT 2024-3 A3 4.57
03/21/2029 805,000.00 08/09/20244.66%
804,873.53
804,897.27
100.54
4.21%
809,381.37
1,021.90
0.35%
4,484.11
Aaa/NA
AAA
3.72 1.35
05522RDJ4 BACCT 2024-1 A 4.93 05/15/2029 645,000.00 06/06/2024
4.93%
644,963.82
644,971.64
101.48
4.14%
654,554.45
1,413.27
0.28%
9,582.81
Aaa/AAA
NA
3.87 1.75
477911AD3 JDOT 2024-C A3 4.06 06/15/2029 1,400,000.00 01/22/2025
4.72%
1,381,296.88
1,383,150.87
99.95 4.12%
1,399,310.64
2,526.22
0.60%
16,159.77
Aaa/NA
AAA
3.96 1.74
34535VAD6 FORDO 2024-D A3 4.61
08/15/2029 1,145,000.00 11/19/20244.66%
1,144,963.25
1,144,967.95
101.00
4.08%
1,156,458.47
2,345.98
0.49%
11,490.52
Aaa/NA
AAA
4.13 1.73
89240JAD3 TAOT 25A A3 4.64 08/15/2029 1,160,000.00 01/22/2025
4.69%
1,159,953.48
1,159,957.77
100.92
4.14%
1,170,702.97
2,392.18
0.50%
10,745.20
Aaa/NA
AAA
4.13 1.70
47800DAD6 JDOT 2025 A3 4.23 09/17/2029 945,000.00 03/04/2025
5.09%
944,940.56
944,944.59
100.25
4.16%
947,333.77
1,776.60
0.40%
2,389.18
Aaa/NA
AAA
4.22 2.18
096924AD7 BMWOT 2025-A A3 4.56
09/25/2029 1,000,000.00 05/20/20254.39%
1,004,492.19
1,004,345.20
100.86
4.09%
1,008,562.60
760.00
0.43%
4,217.40
Aaa/AAA
NA
4.24 1.65
92970QAE5 WFCIT 2024-2 A 4.29 10/15/2029 720,000.00 10/17/2024
4.29%
719,893.01
719,907.73
100.47
4.11%
723,384.72
1,372.80
0.31%
3,476.99
Aaa/AAA
NA
4.29 2.14
44935CAD3 HART 2025-A A3 4.32 10/15/2029 1,190,000.00 03/04/2025
4.84%
1,189,824.47
1,189,836.08
100.39
4.16%
1,194,596.49
2,284.80
0.51%
4,760.41
NA/AAA
AAA
4.29 1.98
437921AD1 HAROT 252 A3 4.15 10/15/2029 620,000.00 04/29/2025
4.15%
619,930.75
619,933.06
100.20
4.09%
621,229.58
1,143.56
0.26%
1,296.53
Aaa/NA
AAA
4.29 2.14
362955AD8 GMCAR 2025-1 A3 4.62
12/17/2029 770,000.00 01/09/20255.03%
769,942.79
769,948.11
100.90
4.09%
776,897.66
1,482.25
0.33%
6,949.55
Aaa/NA
AAA
4.47 1.55
58773DAD6 MBART 2025-1 A3 4.78
12/17/2029 1,120,000.00 01/14/20254.84%
1,119,761.78
1,119,782.95
101.32
4.06%
1,134,793.97
2,379.38
0.48%
15,011.02
Aaa/NA
AAA
4.47 1.71
02582JKM1 AMXCA 2025-1 A 4.56 12/17/2029 1,000,000.00 05/20/2025
4.40%
1,004,726.56
1,004,519.96
101.26
4.05%
1,012,573.70
2,026.67
0.43%
8,053.74
NA/AAA
AAA
4.47 2.28
02582JKP4 AMXCA 2025-2 A 4.28 04/15/2030 1,625,000.00 05/06/2025
4.28%
1,624,970.59
1,624,971.39
100.61
4.08%
1,634,939.64
3,091.11
0.70%
9,968.25
NA/AAA
AAA
4.79 2.58
Total ABS 23,048,210.24 4.76%
22,998,667.87
23,037,960.31
100.72
4.19%
23,213,126.38
42,721.95
9.90%
175,166.06
3.57 1.62
40 ATTACHMENT 1
185
HOLDINGS REPORT
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2025 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt
Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
AGENCY
3137EAEU9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE
CORP 0.375 07/21/2025 1,200,000.00 07/21/20200.48%
1,194,024.00
1,199,934.47
99.78 4.31%
1,197,380.95
2,000.00
0.51%
(2,553.52)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
0.06 0.06
3135G05X7 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION 0.375 08/25/2025 2,150,000.00 --0.51%
2,136,456.52
2,149,563.50
99.39 4.48%
2,136,822.67
2,821.88
0.91%
(12,740.82)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
0.15 0.15
3137EAEX3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE
CORP 0.375 09/23/2025 1,800,000.00 --0.44%
1,794,640.80
1,799,750.09
99.09 4.41%
1,783,599.44
1,837.50
0.76%
(16,150.64)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
0.23 0.23
3135G06G3 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION 0.5 11/07/2025 2,200,000.00 --0.56%
2,193,135.20
2,199,513.37
98.68 4.32%
2,170,963.23
1,650.00
0.93%
(28,550.13)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
0.36 0.34
880591EZ1 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
3.875 03/15/2028 1,200,000.00 05/01/20233.81%
1,203,612.00
1,202,005.99
100.30
3.76%
1,203,616.84
13,691.67
0.51%
1,610.85
Aa1/AA+
AA+
2.71 2.52
3133EPME2 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 3.875 06/08/2028 2,000,000.00 06/07/20233.96% 1,992,080.00
1,995,348.57
100.19
3.81%
2,003,791.78
4,951.39
0.85%
8,443.21
Aa1/AA+
AA+
2.94 2.75
Total Agency 10,550,000.00 1.54%
10,513,948.52
10,546,115.98
99.49 4.20%
10,496,174.92
26,952.43
4.48%
(49,941.07)
1.02 0.96
AGENCY CMBS
3137BSP72 FHMS K-058 A2 2.653 08/25/2026 500,000.00 11/12/2021
1.36%
528,808.59
506,640.40
98.16 4.23%
490,776.30
1,105.42
0.21%
(15,864.10)
Aa1/AA+
AAA
1.15 1.07
3137BSRE5 FHMS K-059 A2 3.12 09/25/2026 1,000,000.00 02/18/2022
1.98%
1,042,812.50
1,011,079.36
98.61 4.22%
986,082.80
2,600.00
0.42%
(24,996.56)
Aa1/AAA
AAA
1.24 1.10
3137BTAC5 FHMS K-060 A2 3.3 10/25/2026 1,000,000.00 10/31/2022
4.80%
946,875.00
982,998.51
98.71 4.18%
987,105.20
2,750.00
0.42%
4,106.69
Aa1/AA+
AAA
1.32 1.25
3137FBBX3 FHMS K-068 A2 3.244 08/25/2027 2,000,000.00 --
4.59%
1,887,460.94
1,950,934.15
98.27 4.04%
1,965,488.00
5,406.67
0.84%
14,553.85
Aaa/AA+
AA+
2.15 1.98
3137FBU79 FHMS K-069 A2 3.187 09/25/2027 1,472,048.91 04/13/2023
4.08%
1,419,147.15
1,445,813.35
98.15 4.01%
1,444,802.90
3,909.52
0.62%
(1,010.44)
Aa1/AAA
AA+
2.24 2.06
3137F4D41 FHMS K-074 A2 3.6 01/25/2028 1,000,000.00 03/14/2023
5.09%
966,757.81
982,647.99
98.87 4.01%
988,661.60
3,000.00
0.42%
6,013.61
Aa1/AA+
AAA
2.57 2.34
3137FJEH8 FHMS K-081 A2 3.9 08/25/2028 3,530,000.00 --
4.94%
3,369,780.09
3,428,253.77
99.55 4.00%
3,513,960.74
11,472.50
1.50%
85,706.97
Aa1/AA+
AAA
3.15 2.89
41 ATTACHMENT 1
186
HOLDINGS REPORT
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2025 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt
Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
3137FJKE8 FHMS K-082 A2 3.92 09/25/2028 1,000,000.00 11/28/2023
4.74%
964,531.25
976,340.55
99.65 3.98%
996,529.10
3,266.67
0.42%
20,188.55
Aa1/AA+
AAA
3.24 2.92
3137H5YC5 FHMS K-748 A2 2.26 01/25/2029 2,237,000.00 03/25/2024
4.61%
2,014,523.35
2,073,339.02
94.13 4.06%
2,105,653.87
4,213.02
0.90%
32,314.86
Aa1/AA+
AAA
3.57 3.28
3137FKZZ2 FHMS K-088 A2 3.69 01/25/2029 1,400,000.00 07/29/2024
4.47%
1,355,265.63
1,364,566.84
98.76 4.03%
1,382,654.84
4,305.00
0.59%
18,088.00
Aaa/AA+
AA+
3.57 3.21
3137FLMV3 FHMS K-090 A2 3.422 02/25/2029 1,520,000.00 03/18/2024
4.70%
1,434,975.00
1,457,307.21
97.84 4.04%
1,487,143.07
4,334.53
0.63%
29,835.86
Aa1/AAA
AA+
3.66 3.32
3137FLN91 FHMS K-091 A2 3.505 03/25/2029 2,810,000.00 11/15/2024
4.65%
2,686,074.61
2,703,766.90
98.06 4.05%
2,755,496.12
8,207.54
1.18%
51,729.21
Aa1/AAA
AA+
3.73 3.34
3137FMTY8 FHMS K-094 A2 2.903 06/25/2029 1,052,000.00 12/19/2024
4.68%
977,168.28
985,898.65
95.75 4.06%
1,007,290.74
2,544.96
0.43%
21,392.09
Aa1/AA+
AAA
3.99 3.62
3137FNX54 FHMS K-097 A2 2.508 07/25/2029 1,250,000.00 10/22/2024
4.32%
1,153,417.97
1,167,481.67
94.16 4.07%
1,177,022.88
2,612.50
0.50%
9,541.21
Aaa/AA+
AA+
4.07 3.76
3137H9D71 FHMS K-750 A2 3.0 09/25/2029 3,000,000.00 11/14/2024
4.63%
2,802,304.69
2,827,653.14
96.04 4.10%
2,881,129.80
7,500.00
1.23%
53,476.66
Aa1/AA+
AAA
4.24 3.55
3137FRUT6 FHMS K-106 A2 2.069 01/25/2030 2,000,000.00 06/06/2025
4.37%
1,810,078.13
1,812,359.47
91.55 4.12%
1,831,017.80
3,448.33
0.78%
18,658.33
Aa1/AA+
AAA
4.57 4.24
25,359,980.99 97.18 26,000,815.76 11.09% 3.27
Total Agency CMBS 26,771,048.91 4.47% 25,677,080.98 4.06% 70,676.65 323,734.78 2.95 CASH
CCYUSD Receivable 39,308.37 -- 39,308.37
39,308.37
1.00 0.00%
39,308.37
0.00 0.02%
0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA
0.00 0.00
39,308.37 1.00 39,308.37 0.02% 0.00
Total Cash 39,308.37 39,308.37 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00
CORPORATE
40139LBC6 GUARDIAN LIFE GLOBAL FUNDING
0.875 12/10/2025 1,100,000.00 --1.12%
1,088,890.00
1,098,821.54
98.42 4.52%
1,082,623.31
561.46
0.46%
(16,198.23)
Aa1/AA+
NA
0.45 0.43
66815L2A6 NORTHWESTERNMUTUAL
GLOBAL FUNDING 0.8 01/14/2026 650,000.00 12/06/20211.46% 632,755.50
647,732.20
98.10 4.42%
637,671.72
2,412.22
0.27%
(10,060.48)
Aa1/AA+
AAA
0.54 0.52
42 ATTACHMENT 1
187
HOLDINGS REPORT
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2025 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt
Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
023135BX3 AMAZON.COM INC 1.0
05/12/2026 1,655,000.00 05/10/20211.09%
1,647,850.40
1,653,766.64
97.38 4.11%
1,611,679.12
2,252.64
0.69%
(42,087.52)
A1/AA
AA0.870.84
91324PEC2 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 1.15
05/15/2026 275,000.00 --1.08%
275,889.15
275,146.43
97.21 4.45%
267,315.53
404.10
0.11%
(7,830.90)
A2/A+
A
0.87 0.85
89236TJK2 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
1.125 06/18/2026 1,130,000.00 06/15/20211.13%
1,129,502.80
1,129,904.15
97.05 4.28%
1,096,705.34
459.06
0.47%
(33,198.81)
A1/A+
A+
0.97 0.94
57629WDE7 MASSMUTUAL GLOBAL FUNDING
II 1.2 07/16/2026 772,000.00 08/10/20211.21%
771,785.72
771,954.74
96.93 4.24%
748,301.33
4,246.00
0.32%
(23,653.41)
Aa3/AA+
AA+
1.04 1.01
58989V2D5 MET TOWER GLOBAL FUNDING
1.25 09/14/2026 585,000.00 09/07/20211.27%
584,461.80
584,870.31
96.43 4.33%
564,089.75
2,173.44
0.24%
(20,780.57)
Aa3/AAAA1.21
1.17 931142ER0 WALMART INC 1.05 09/17/2026 265,000.00 09/08/2021
1.09%
264,499.15
264,878.49
96.64 3.91%
256,108.42
803.83
0.11%
(8,770.07)
Aa2/AA
AA
1.22 1.18
26442CAS3 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS LLC
2.95 12/01/2026 1,355,000.00 10/28/20224.88%
1,258,727.25
1,321,553.13
98.37 4.15%
1,332,902.65
3,331.04
0.57%
11,349.52
Aa3/A
NA
1.42 1.37
59217GER6 METROPOLITAN LIFE GLOBAL
FUNDING I 1.875 01/11/2027 845,000.00 01/03/20221.90%
844,036.70
844,705.10
96.65 4.16%
816,689.25
7,481.77
0.35%
(28,015.85)
Aa3/AAAA1.53
1.47 808513BY0 CHARLES SCHWAB CORP 2.45
03/03/2027 725,000.00 03/01/20222.46%
724,796.70
724,929.82
97.18 4.21%
704,572.12
5,822.15
0.30%
(20,357.71)
A2/AA1.67
1.60 084664CZ2 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCE
CORP 2.3 03/15/2027 1,225,000.00 03/07/20222.30%
1,224,767.25
1,224,920.72
97.49 3.83%
1,194,260.55
8,295.97
0.51%
(30,660.17)
Aa2/AA
A+
1.71 1.64
665859AW4 NORTHERN TRUST CORP 4.0
05/10/2027 455,000.00 05/05/20224.03%
454,262.90
454,726.31
99.88 4.07%
454,443.54
2,578.33
0.19%
(282.77)
A2/A+
A+
1.86 1.76
91324PEG3 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 3.7
05/15/2027 465,000.00 05/17/20223.69%
465,220.50
465,080.08
99.09 4.21%
460,762.60
2,198.42
0.20%
(4,317.48)
A2/A+
A
1.87 1.78
14913R3A3 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORP 3.6 08/12/2027 1,000,000.00 11/02/20225.05%
938,730.00
972,847.05
99.01 4.09%
990,117.64
13,900.00
0.42%
17,270.59
A2/A
A+
2.12 1.99
756109BG8 REALTY INCOME CORP 3.95
08/15/2027 1,425,000.00 --5.41%
1,337,997.25
1,386,287.43
99.43 4.23%
1,416,826.30
21,264.17
0.60%
30,538.86
A3/ANA2.13
1.98 24422EXZ7 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 4.65
01/07/2028 1,310,000.00 01/06/20254.66%
1,309,607.00
1,309,669.20
101.51
4.01%
1,329,782.73
29,103.83
0.57%
20,113.53
A1/A
A+
2.52 2.31
61690U8A1 MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA
4.952 01/14/2028 1,500,000.00 11/20/20244.79%
1,504,785.00
1,503,430.06
100.81
4.82%
1,512,081.29
34,457.67
0.64%
8,651.22
Aa3/A+
AA2.541.43
46647PEA0 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 5.04
01/23/2028 1,000,000.00 11/20/20244.81%
1,004,560.00
1,003,283.43
100.95
4.85%
1,009,534.06
22,120.00
0.43%
6,250.63
A1/A
AA2.571.46
43 ATTACHMENT 1
188
HOLDINGS REPORT
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2025 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt
Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
57636QAW4 MASTERCARD INC 4.875
03/09/2028 775,000.00 03/06/20234.90%
774,248.25
774,595.94
102.26
3.98%
792,511.91
11,754.17
0.34%
17,915.97
Aa3/A+
NA
2.69 2.40
63743HFG2
NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES
COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORP 4.8
03/15/2028
900,000.00
04/10/2023
4.39%
915,975.00
908,655.38
101.59
4.17%
914,334.56
12,720.00
0.39%
5,679.18
A2/AA2.71
2.41 74340XCG4 PROLOGIS LP 4.875 06/15/2028 1,600,000.00 --
5.02%
1,589,759.50
1,593,851.71
102.01
4.14%
1,632,198.11
3,466.67
0.70%
38,346.40
A2/A
NA
2.96 2.66
24422EXB0 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 4.95
07/14/2028 1,000,000.00 09/12/20235.06%
995,310.00
997,053.14
102.45
4.08%
1,024,544.13
22,962.50
0.44%
27,490.99
A1/A
A+
3.04 2.74
89115A2U5 TORONTO-DOMINION BANK 5.523
07/17/2028 1,400,000.00 --5.45%
1,404,594.00
1,402,826.42
103.44
4.31%
1,448,127.41
35,224.47
0.62%
45,300.98
A2/AAA3.05
2.72 06051GKW8 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 4.948
07/22/2028 1,500,000.00 11/20/20244.82%
1,504,650.00
1,503,589.05
101.15
5.01%
1,517,283.53
32,780.50
0.65%
13,694.47
A1/AAA3.06
1.90 78016HZS2 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 5.2
08/01/2028 1,000,000.00 08/07/20235.31%
995,280.00
997,075.62
102.87
4.20%
1,028,711.28
21,666.67
0.44%
31,635.66
A1/A
AA3.092.77
74456QBX3 PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRICAND
GAS CO 3.65 09/01/2028 1,000,000.00 12/07/20234.77%
953,250.00
968,634.70
98.46 4.17%
984,560.30
12,166.67
0.42%
15,925.60
A1/A
NA
3.17 2.92
91324PDP4 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 3.875
12/15/2028 1,000,000.00 12/12/20234.77%
960,560.00
972,735.24
98.71 4.28%
987,073.00
1,722.22
0.42%
14,337.76
A2/A+
A
3.46 3.19
66815L2Q1
NORTHWESTERNMUTUAL
GLOBAL FUNDING 4.71
01/10/2029
800,000.00
--
4.67%
801,507.56
801,063.63
101.09
4.37%
808,710.52
17,898.00
0.34%
7,646.89
Aa1/AA+
AAA
3.53 3.15
57629W5B2 MASSMUTUAL GLOBAL FUNDING
II 4.85 01/17/2029 800,000.00 01/09/20244.85%
799,896.00
799,926.23
101.60
4.36%
812,830.69
17,675.56
0.35%
12,904.46
Aa3/AA+
AA+
3.55 3.16
46647PAM8 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.509
01/23/2029 1,300,000.00 01/18/20245.07%
1,227,577.00
1,253,601.69
97.95 4.67%
1,273,405.69
20,020.79
0.54%
19,804.00
A1/A
AA3.572.38
69371RS80 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 4.6
01/31/2029 1,250,000.00 04/09/20244.85%
1,236,725.00
1,240,096.67
101.37
4.18%
1,267,094.14
24,118.06
0.54%
26,997.47
A1/A+
NA
3.59 3.22
17275RBR2 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.85
02/26/2029 685,000.00 02/21/20244.86%
684,760.25
684,824.68
102.48
4.11%
701,970.57
11,535.59
0.30%
17,145.89
A1/AANA3.66
3.21 06051GMT3 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 4.623
05/09/2029 1,000,000.00 05/19/20254.64%
999,600.00
999,615.48
100.63
4.66%
1,006,346.13
6,677.67
0.43%
6,730.65
A1/AAA3.86
2.63 64952WFG3 NEW YORK LIFE GLOBAL FUNDING
5.0 06/06/2029 650,000.00 06/03/20245.04%
648,752.00
649,018.55
102.29
4.36%
664,872.62
2,256.94
0.28%
15,854.07
Aa1/AA+
AAA
3.93 3.53
44 ATTACHMENT 1
189
HOLDINGS REPORT
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2025 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt
Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
24422EXT1 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 4.85
06/11/2029 750,000.00 06/07/20245.04%
743,835.00
745,134.85
102.46
4.17%
768,438.65
2,020.83
0.33%
23,303.80
A1/A
A+
3.95 3.56
341081GT8 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO 5.15
06/15/2029 1,000,000.00 06/13/20244.82%
1,013,864.81
1,010,884.23
103.48
4.19%
1,034,798.57
2,288.89
0.44%
23,914.34
Aa2/A+
AA3.963.42
437076DC3 HOME DEPOT INC 4.75
06/25/2029 1,000,000.00 06/20/20244.84%
995,870.00
996,709.12
102.07
4.18%
1,020,732.62
791.67
0.44%
24,023.50
A2/A
A
3.99 3.53
713448FX1 PEPSICO INC 4.5 07/17/2029 1,165,000.00 07/15/2024
4.53%
1,163,194.25
1,163,539.38
101.59
4.07%
1,183,571.92
23,882.50
0.50%
20,032.54
A1/A+
NA
4.05 3.53
30303M8S4 META PLATFORMS INC 4.3
08/15/2029 760,000.00 08/12/20244.33%
758,820.12
759,026.89
100.91
4.06%
766,928.96
12,345.78
0.33%
7,902.07
Aa3/AANA4.13
3.62 171239AL0 CHUBB INA HOLDINGS LLC 4.65
08/15/2029 721,000.00 08/12/20244.52%
725,073.59
724,347.38
101.70
4.19%
733,288.41
12,665.57
0.31%
8,941.04
A2/A
A
4.13 3.59
40139LBJ1 GUARDIAN LIFE GLOBAL FUNDING
4.179 09/26/2029 940,000.00 09/23/20244.18%
940,000.00
940,000.00
99.55 4.29%
935,791.55
10,366.24
0.40%
(4,208.45)
Aa1/AA+
NA
4.24 3.80
14913UAU4 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORP 4.7 11/15/2029 2,000,000.00 --4.70%
2,000,040.00
2,000,033.08
101.85
4.23%
2,036,905.12
12,011.11
0.87%
36,872.04
A2/A
A+
4.38 3.90
857449AE2 STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST
CO 4.782 11/23/2029 2,000,000.00 11/29/20244.60%
2,016,280.00
2,014,389.48
102.13
4.24%
2,042,601.22
10,095.33
0.87%
28,211.74
Aa2/AAAA4.40
3.92 26444HAH4 DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA LLC 2.5
12/01/2029 1,368,000.00 12/02/20244.63%
1,239,667.92
1,254,443.00
92.86 4.29%
1,270,298.70
2,850.00
0.54%
15,855.70
A1/A
NA
4.42 4.10
64952WFK4 NEW YORK LIFE GLOBAL FUNDING
4.6 12/05/2029 1,560,000.00 12/02/20244.61%
1,559,110.80
1,559,212.09
101.11
4.32%
1,577,392.58
5,182.67
0.67%
18,180.49
Aa1/AA+
AAA
4.43 3.96
59217GFT1 METROPOLITAN LIFE GLOBAL
FUNDING I 4.9 01/09/2030 1,540,000.00 01/02/20254.95%
1,536,827.60
1,537,128.16
102.02
4.40%
1,571,045.34
36,053.11
0.67%
33,917.18
Aa3/AAAA4.53
3.94 89236TNA9 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
4.95 01/09/2030 1,660,000.00 01/06/20255.00%
1,656,447.60
1,656,784.16
102.26
4.39%
1,697,557.58
39,259.00
0.72%
40,773.42
A1/A+
A+
4.53 3.93
57629TBV8 MASSMUTUAL GLOBAL FUNDING
II 4.95 01/10/2030 1,500,000.00 01/03/20254.96%
1,499,280.00
1,499,347.82
102.11
4.43%
1,531,637.18
35,268.75
0.65%
32,289.35
Aa3/AA+
AA+
4.53 3.94
46647PEB8 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 5.012
01/23/2030 1,000,000.00 01/21/20255.02%
999,750.00
999,777.21
101.85
4.70%
1,018,457.00
21,997.11
0.43%
18,679.79
A1/A
AA4.573.17
63743HFX5
NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES
COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORP 4.95
02/07/2030
1,000,000.00
02/05/2025
4.88%
1,002,872.78
1,002,642.32
102.28
4.40%
1,022,838.47
19,800.00
0.44%
20,196.15
A2/NA
A
4.61 3.94
45 ATTACHMENT 1
190
HOLDINGS REPORT
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2025 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt
Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
00287YDZ9 ABBVIE INC 4.875 03/15/2030 2,000,000.00 05/21/2025
4.67%
2,017,080.00
2,016,685.09
102.40
4.30%
2,047,999.68
33,854.17
0.87%
31,314.59
A3/ANA4.71
4.05 40139LBK8 GUARDIAN LIFE GLOBAL FUNDING
4.798 04/28/2030 1,000,000.00 05/19/20254.62%
1,007,620.00
1,007,442.59
101.73
4.39%
1,017,291.92
8,396.50
0.43%
9,849.33
Aa1/AA+
NA
4.83 4.24
57629TBX4 MASSMUTUAL GLOBAL FUNDING
II 4.55 05/07/2030 1,000,000.00 05/19/20254.68%
994,200.00
994,334.36
100.71
4.38%
1,007,139.17
6,825.00
0.43%
12,804.81
Aa3/AA+
AA+
4.85 4.29
69371RT71 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 4.55
05/08/2030 1,000,000.00 05/19/20254.57%
999,060.00
999,081.76
101.26
4.26%
1,012,618.47
6,698.61
0.43%
13,536.71
A1/A+
NA
4.85 4.29
74153WCW7 PRICOA GLOBAL FUNDING I 4.7
05/28/2030 1,900,000.00 05/20/20254.70%
1,899,813.50
1,899,816.97
101.11
4.44%
1,921,133.34
8,185.83
0.82%
21,316.37
Aa3/AAAA4.91
4.33 66815L2W8 NORTHWESTERNMUTUAL
GLOBAL FUNDING 4.6 06/03/2030 1,000,000.00 05/27/20254.60% 999,820.00
999,822.76
101.05
4.36%
1,010,528.81
3,577.78
0.43%
10,706.05
Aa1/AA+
AAA
4.93 4.35
Total Corporate 62,261,000.00 4.32%
61,724,097.60
61,966,253.69
100.56
4.31%
62,580,037.08
732,929.01
26.69%
613,783.39
3.36 2.90
MONEY MARKET
FUND
X9USDDGCM DREYFUS GVT CM INST 10,817,400.21 --
4.21%
10,817,400.21
10,817,400.21
1.00 4.21%
10,817,400.21
0.00 4.61%
0.00 Aaa/AAAm
NA
0.00 0.00
Total Money Market
Fund 10,817,400.21 4.21%
10,817,400.21
10,817,400.21
1.00 4.21%
10,817,400.21
0.00 4.61%
0.00 0.00
0.00 MUNICIPAL BONDS
13063EGT7 CALIFORNIA STATE 4.5 08/01/2029 2,400,000.00 --
4.41%
2,409,753.35
2,408,432.59
101.77
4.02%
2,442,588.00
45,000.00
1.04%
34,155.41
Aa2/AAAA4.09
3.64 Total Municipal
Bonds 2,400,000.00 4.41%
2,409,753.35
2,408,432.59
101.77
4.02%
2,442,588.00
45,000.00
1.04%
34,155.41
4.09 3.64
SUPRANATIONAL
459058JL8
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR
RECONSTRUCTION AND
DEVELOPM 0.5 10/28/2025
2,150,000.00
--
0.60%
2,140,429.05
2,149,337.15
98.74 4.43%
2,122,906.15
1,881.25
0.91%
(26,430.99)
Aaa/AAA
NA
0.33 0.32
46 ATTACHMENT 1
191
HOLDINGS REPORT
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2025 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt
Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
4581X0DV7 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT
BANK 0.875 04/20/2026 2,175,000.00 04/13/20210.97%
2,165,038.50
2,173,401.58
97.47 4.11%
2,119,911.80
3,753.39
0.90%
(53,489.78)
Aaa/AAA
NA
0.80 0.78
459058KT9
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR
RECONSTRUCTION AND
DEVELOPM 3.5 07/12/2028
2,450,000.00
08/25/2023
4.56%
2,337,814.50
2,380,191.48
99.26 3.76%
2,431,760.34
40,254.86
1.04%
51,568.85
Aaa/AAA
NA
3.03 2.80
459058LN1
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR
RECONSTRUCTION AND
DEVELOPM 3.875 10/16/2029
2,000,000.00
12/12/2024
4.25%
1,967,440.00
1,971,123.26
100.24
3.81%
2,004,701.16
16,145.83
0.85%
33,577.90
Aaa/AAA
NA
4.30 3.89
459058LR2
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR
RECONSTRUCTION AND
DEVELOPM 4.125 03/20/2030
2,000,000.00
03/14/2025
4.20%
1,993,200.00
1,993,583.57
101.23
3.84%
2,024,501.88
23,145.83
0.86%
30,918.31
Aaa/AAA
NA
4.72 4.21
Total Supranational 10,775,000.00 2.94%
10,603,922.05
10,667,637.04
99.36 3.99%
10,703,781.33
85,181.16
4.56%
36,144.29
2.61 2.38
US TREASURY
91282CAB7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.25
07/31/2025 1,100,000.00 03/12/20210.71%
1,077,828.13
1,099,584.02
99.66 4.34%
1,096,281.16
1,147.10
0.47%
(3,302.85)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
0.08 0.08
91282CAT8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.25
10/31/2025 400,000.00 03/12/20210.78%
390,265.63
399,297.70
98.67 4.33%
394,660.16
168.48
0.17%
(4,637.54)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
0.34 0.33
91282CAZ4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.375
11/30/2025 1,250,000.00 03/26/20210.76%
1,227,587.89
1,248,004.31
98.39 4.31%
1,229,919.44
397.03
0.52%
(18,084.87)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
0.42 0.41
91282CCW9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.75
08/31/2026 530,000.00 09/23/20210.90%
526,252.73
529,114.13
96.38 3.96%
510,808.20
1,328.60
0.22%
(18,305.93)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
1.17 1.14
91282CCZ2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.875
09/30/2026 1,060,000.00 10/18/20211.18%
1,044,141.41
1,055,998.05
96.33 3.92%
1,021,078.13
2,331.42
0.44%
(34,919.93)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
1.25 1.22
912828YQ7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.625
10/31/2026 2,400,000.00 11/02/20224.41%
2,156,250.00
2,318,582.82
97.09 3.89%
2,330,156.26
6,570.65
0.99%
11,573.44
Aa1/AA+
AA+
1.34 1.29
91282CDG3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.125
10/31/2026 1,060,000.00 11/15/20211.25%
1,053,540.63
1,058,261.08
96.43 3.90%
1,022,196.10
2,009.10
0.44%
(36,064.98)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
1.34 1.30
91282CLS8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
10/31/2026 3,000,000.00 11/14/20244.29%
2,990,976.56
2,993,853.96
100.28
3.91%
3,008,320.32
20,849.18
1.28%
14,466.36
Aa1/AA+
AA+
1.34 1.28
91282CLY5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.25
11/30/2026 2,000,000.00 12/18/20244.35%
1,996,171.88
1,997,216.40
100.52
3.87%
2,010,312.50
7,199.45
0.86%
13,096.10
Aa1/AA+
AA+
1.42 1.36
47 ATTACHMENT 1
192
HOLDINGS REPORT
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2025 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt
Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
91282CME8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.25
12/31/2026 3,500,000.00 12/30/20244.26%
3,499,589.84
3,499,692.10
100.58
3.85%
3,520,371.09
404.21
1.50%
20,678.99
Aa1/AA+
AA+
1.50 1.44
91282CJT9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.0
01/15/2027 3,000,000.00 01/16/20254.25%
2,985,937.50
2,989,124.74
100.24
3.84%
3,007,148.43
55,359.12
1.28%
18,023.69
Aa1/AA+
AA+
1.54 1.45
91282CET4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.625
05/31/2027 600,000.00 06/13/20223.40%
578,718.75
591,790.51
97.93 3.75%
587,601.56
1,334.02
0.25%
(4,188.95)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
1.92 1.84
91282CEW7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.25
06/30/2027 3,000,000.00 --3.69%
2,968,183.60
2,974,849.53
99.11 3.72%
2,973,164.07
264.95
1.27%
(1,685.46)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
2.00 1.91
91282CFB2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.75
07/31/2027 1,180,000.00 --2.99%
1,166,739.07
1,174,428.98
98.05 3.73%
1,156,999.22
13,535.77
0.49%
(17,429.77)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
2.08 1.98
91282CFH9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.125
08/31/2027 3,500,000.00 --3.28%
3,474,796.89
3,489,020.99
98.77 3.72%
3,456,933.59
36,557.40
1.47%
(32,087.41)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
2.17 2.05
91282CFU0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
10/31/2027 2,400,000.00 11/03/20224.41%
2,368,968.75
2,385,489.23
100.91
3.71%
2,421,937.49
16,679.35
1.03%
36,448.26
Aa1/AA+
AA+
2.34 2.19
91282CLX7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
11/15/2027 3,000,000.00 11/14/20244.25%
2,989,218.75
2,991,463.61
100.93
3.71%
3,027,773.43
15,805.03
1.29%
36,309.82
Aa1/AA+
AA+
2.38 2.23
91282CGC9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.875
12/31/2027 700,000.00 01/25/20233.57%
709,679.69
704,909.75
100.42
3.70%
702,953.13
73.71 0.30%
(1,956.63)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
2.50 2.36
91282CMF5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.25
01/15/2028 4,000,000.00 01/07/20254.37%
3,986,875.00
3,988,876.71
101.29
3.71%
4,051,718.76
78,425.41
1.73%
62,842.05
Aa1/AA+
AA+
2.54 2.34
91282CGH8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.5
01/31/2028 1,000,000.00 03/14/20233.90%
982,578.13
990,765.72
99.49 3.71%
994,921.88
14,599.45
0.42%
4,156.16
Aa1/AA+
AA+
2.59 2.41
91282CGP0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.0
02/29/2028 2,900,000.00 02/23/20234.16%
2,879,269.53
2,888,959.63
100.76
3.70%
2,921,976.55
38,771.74
1.25%
33,016.91
Aa1/AA+
AA+
2.67 2.48
91282CHA2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.5
04/30/2028 2,100,000.00 --3.55%
2,095,664.07
2,097,492.35
99.46 3.70%
2,088,597.65
12,383.15
0.89%
(8,894.70)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
2.84 2.66
91282CHE4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
05/31/2028 3,000,000.00 --4.01%
2,958,515.62
2,969,297.53
99.79 3.70%
2,993,671.86
9,211.07
1.28%
24,374.33
Aa1/AA+
AA+
2.92 2.73
91282CHX2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.375
08/31/2028 550,000.00 09/25/20234.62%
544,199.22
546,273.46
101.97
3.71%
560,849.61
8,042.63
0.24%
14,576.15
Aa1/AA+
AA+
3.17 2.90
91282CJF9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.875
10/31/2028 750,000.00 10/27/20234.79%
752,841.80
751,894.53
103.59
3.72%
776,953.50
6,159.99
0.33%
25,058.97
Aa1/AA+
AA+
3.34 3.04
91282CJN2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.375
11/30/2028 900,000.00 12/28/20233.83%
921,937.50
915,226.92
102.08
3.72%
918,738.28
3,335.04
0.39%
3,511.36
Aa1/AA+
AA+
3.42 3.14
48 ATTACHMENT 1
193
HOLDINGS REPORT
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2025 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt
Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
91282CJR3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.75
12/31/2028 2,150,000.00 --3.98%
2,127,462.89
2,134,114.44
100.09
3.72%
2,151,931.65
219.09
0.92%
17,817.20
Aa1/AA+
AA+
3.50 3.25
91282CJW2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.0
01/31/2029 3,100,000.00 --4.30%
3,058,937.50
3,070,165.49
100.90
3.73%
3,127,972.66
51,723.76
1.33%
57,807.17
Aa1/AA+
AA+
3.59 3.26
91282CKG5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
03/31/2029 2,500,000.00 --4.59%
2,448,730.47
2,461,234.64
101.35
3.73%
2,533,789.05
25,922.13
1.08%
72,554.41
Aa1/AA+
AA+
3.75 3.42
91282CKP5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.625
04/30/2029 4,000,000.00 --4.47%
4,027,509.77
4,021,229.91
103.13
3.74%
4,125,000.00
31,168.48
1.76%
103,770.09
Aa1/AA+
AA+
3.83 3.47
91282CKX8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.25
06/30/2029 1,250,000.00 07/18/20244.09%
1,258,837.89
1,257,140.74
101.86
3.74%
1,273,242.19
144.36
0.54%
16,101.45
Aa1/AA+
AA+
4.00 3.65
91282CLK5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
08/31/2029 2,500,000.00 09/11/20243.45%
2,519,628.91
2,516,478.32
99.50 3.75%
2,487,597.65
30,290.42
1.06%
(28,880.67)
Aa1/AA+
AA+
4.17 3.79
91282CLN9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.5
09/30/2029 1,500,000.00 10/04/20243.76%
1,482,187.50
1,484,802.09
98.99 3.76%
1,484,882.82
13,196.72
0.63%
80.73 Aa1/AA+
AA+
4.25 3.88
91282CLR0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
10/31/2029 3,000,000.00 11/19/20244.24%
2,985,234.38
2,987,057.60
101.43
3.76%
3,042,890.64
20,849.18
1.30%
55,833.04
Aa1/AA+
AA+
4.34 3.91
91282CMA6 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
11/30/2029 2,000,000.00 12/18/20244.40%
1,975,625.00
1,978,241.91
101.47
3.76%
2,029,376.00
6,987.70
0.87%
51,134.09
Aa1/AA+
AA+
4.42 4.00
91282CMD0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.375
12/31/2029 4,000,000.00 --4.49%
3,978,828.13
3,980,759.30
102.48
3.77%
4,099,218.76
475.54
1.75%
118,459.46
Aa1/AA+
AA+
4.50 4.06
91282CGQ8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.0
02/28/2030 4,000,000.00 --4.02%
3,995,703.13
3,995,806.55
100.97
3.77%
4,038,906.24
53,478.26
1.72%
43,099.69
Aa1/AA+
AA+
4.67 4.17
91282CGS4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
03/31/2030 4,000,000.00 --3.85%
3,961,015.63
3,961,935.75
99.29 3.79%
3,971,406.24
36,448.09
1.69%
9,470.49
Aa1/AA+
AA+
4.75 4.28
91282CNG2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.0
05/31/2030 5,000,000.00 06/03/20254.02%
4,996,484.38
4,996,536.48
100.97
3.78%
5,048,440.00
16,939.89
2.15%
51,903.52
Aa1/AA+
AA+
4.92 4.42
Total US Treasury 87,880,000.00 3.91%
87,142,914.15
87,494,972.01
100.39
3.78%
88,200,696.23
640,786.68
37.61%
705,724.22
3.03 2.78
Total Portfolio 234,541,967.73 4.04%
231,609,993.11
232,655,161.18
95.44 4.04%
234,493,928.27
1,644,247.90
100.00%
1,838,767.09
2.96 2.50
Total Market Value +
Accrued 236,138,176.17
49 ATTACHMENT 1
194
HOLDINGS REPORT
West Sacramento Enhanced Cash | Account #11169(CLOSED) | As of June 30, 2025 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt
Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
CASH
CCYUSD Receivable 359.13 -- 359.13
359.13
1.00 0.00%
359.13
0.00 0.34%
0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA
0.00 0.00
Total Cash 359.13
359.13
359.13
1.00 0.00%
359.13
0.00 0.34%
0.00 0.00
0.00 MONEY MARKET
FUND
X9USDDGCM DREYFUS GVT CM INST 104,542.58 --
4.21%
104,542.58
104,542.58
1.00 4.21%
104,542.58
0.00 99.66%
0.00 Aaa/AAAm
NA
0.00 0.00
Total Money Market
Fund 104,542.58 4.21%
104,542.58
104,542.58
1.00 4.21%
104,542.58
0.00 99.66%
0.00 0.00
0.00 Total Portfolio 104,901.71 4.21%
104,901.71
104,901.71
1.00 4.20%
104,901.71
0.00 100.00%
0.00 0.00
0.00 Total Market Value +
Accrued 104,901.71
50 ATTACHMENT 1
195
HOLDINGS REPORT
City of West Sacramento Reporting Portfolio | Account #10676 | As of June 30, 2025 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt
Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
CASH
86723G1$8 Suncrest Bank 1,047,848.88 --
0.02%
1,047,848.88
1,047,848.88
1.00 0.02%
1,047,848.88
0.00 0.75%
0.00 NA/NA
NA
0.00 0.00
90JPMC$04 CASH JP MORGAN CHASE CASH
ACCT 34,908,682.51 --1.94%
34,908,682.51
34,908,682.51
1.00 1.94%
34,908,682.51
0.00 24.92%
0.00 NA/NA
NA
0.00 0.00
90BOFA$00 Cash BOA 17,990,841.42 --
0.00%
17,990,841.42
17,990,841.42
1.00 0.00%
17,990,841.42
0.00 12.84%
0.00 NA/NA
NA
0.00 0.00
CCYUSD Receivable 843,442.62 -- 843,442.62
843,442.62
1.00 0.00%
843,442.62
0.00 0.60%
0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA
0.00 0.00
Total Cash 54,790,815.43 1.26%
54,790,815.43
54,790,815.43
1.00 1.24%
54,790,815.43
0.00 39.11%
0.00 0.00
0.00 LAIF
90LAIF$00 Local Agency Investment Fund
State Pool 79,405,399.42 --4.27%
79,405,399.38
79,405,399.38
1.00 4.27%
79,405,399.42
0.00 56.67%
0.04 NA/NA
NA
0.00 0.00
Total LAIF 79,405,399.42 4.27%
79,405,399.38
79,405,399.38
1.00 4.27%
79,405,399.42
0.00 56.67%
0.04 0.00
0.00 LOCAL GOV
INVESTMENT POOL
90CAMP$00 CAMP 5,914,550.51 --
4.43%
5,910,550.51
5,910,550.51
1.00 4.43%
5,914,550.51
0.00 4.22%
4,000.00
NA/AAAm
NA
0.00 0.00
Total Local Gov
Investment Pool 5,914,550.51 4.43%
5,910,550.51
5,910,550.51
1.00 4.43%
5,914,550.51
0.00 4.22%
4,000.00
0.00 0.00
Total Portfolio 140,110,765.36 3.11%
140,106,765.32
140,106,765.32
1.00 3.09%
140,110,765.36
0.00 100.00%
4,000.04
0.00 0.00
Total Market Value +
Accrued 140,110,765.36
51 ATTACHMENT 1
196
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2025 ITEM # 7
SUBJECT:
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 30, 2025, MAY 21, 2025, JUNE 4, 2025, JUNE 18, 2025, JULY 16, 2025, AND AUGUST 6, 2025 REGULAR
MEETINGS OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT
SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AND WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
City Manager’s Office
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with the draft minutes of the April 30, 2025, May 21, 2025, June 4, 2025, June 18, 2025, July 16, 2025, and August 6, 2025 Regular Meetings of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve the minutes of the April 30, 2025, May 21, 2025, June 4, 2025, June 18, 2025, July 16, 2025, and August 6, 2025 Regular Meetings of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority.
BACKGROUND
N/A
ANALYSIS
N/A
Environmental Considerations
N/A
Commission Recommendations
N/A
Strategic Plan Integration
N/A
Coordination and Review
N/A
Budget Cost Impact
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1) Draft Minutes of the April 30, 2025, Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority 2) Draft Minutes of the May 21, 2025, Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority 3) Draft Minutes of the June 4, 2025, Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority 4) Draft Minutes of the June 18, 2025, Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority 5) Draft Minutes of the July 16, 2025, Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority 6) Draft Minutes of the August 6, Regular Meeting of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority 197
WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL AND
WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND
WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
City Council Regular Meeting
APRIL 30, 2025 MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m.
Present
Mayor Martha Guerrero; Mayor Pro Tem Dawnte Early; Council Member Quirina Orozco; Council Member Norma Alcala; Council Member Verna Sulpizio Hull GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART I
Mayor Guerrero and City Attorney Mitchell reported that the City Council met in a Closed Session and no action was taken.
1. PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WITHIN THE
JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL
The Council is prohibited from discussing issues not on the agenda brought to them at this time.
According to State Law (the Brown Act), items must first be noticed on the agenda before any discussion or action.
The City Council received public comment on items not on the agenda within the City's jurisdiction
PRESENTATIONS
2. City Manager's Office
PROCLAMATION OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL RECOGNIZING MAY 4, 2025
AS INTERNATIONAL FIREFIGHTERS' DAY
City Council presented a proclamation recognizing May 4, 2025, as International Firefighters’ Day in West Sacramento.
3. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING MAY 2025 AS “MAY IS BIKE MONTH”
IN THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
City Council presented a proclamation declaring May 2025 as “May is Bike Month”.
4. City Manager's Office
PROCLAMATION OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL RECOGNIZING MAY 1, 2025
AS THE BIG DAY OF GIVING
City Council presented a proclamation recognizing May 1, 2025 as the Big Day of Giving in West Sacramento.
CONSENT AGENDA
Approved the Consent Agenda.
198
2 MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Early
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
5. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A COMMERCIAL LEASE AGREEMENT WITH CIVIL PACIFIC FOR 2286 DEL MONTE STREET
Approved the commercial lease with Civil Pacific for 2286 Del Monte Street; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the commercial lease for 2286 Del Monte Street, in its final form, as approved by the City Attorney.
6. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF SECURITY PAVING COMPANY INC. COMMERCIAL LEASE AT 2090 LOCKS DRIVE
Approved as to form, the Security Paving Company Inc. commercial lease; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the Security Paving Company, Inc. commercial lease, in its final form, as shall be approved by the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the commercial lease with the approval from the City Attorney.
Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF REJECTION OF ALL BIDS FOR FENCE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE & REPAIR SERVICES PROJECT (24-066-ITB)
Rejected all bids for the Fence Installation, Maintenance & Repair Services Project (24-066-ITB) and authorized City staff to revise the scope and rebid the Fence Installation, Maintenance & Repair Services Project.
8. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 24-9 REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ACCOMMODATE TINY
HOME ON WHEELS AS LEGAL DWELLINGS
Found that, pursuant to Section 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines, the amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Municipal Code to accommodate Tiny Homes on Wheels (THoWs) as legal dwellings are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Title 14, Article 19 of the California Code of Regulations. The project is considered exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15305 (a) Minor Alteration to Land Use Limitations because the project consists of adding a new allowable residential housing type which is considered a minor land use change and waived the second reading and adopted Ordinance 24-9 amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Municipal Code to accommodate tiny homes on wheels as legal dwellings.
9. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 25-6 REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE
PUBLIC NOTICING, ENGAGEMENT AND PARTICIPATION PROCEDURES IN THE REVIEW OF
LARGE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Found that the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 17.35 of the Municipal Code is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines as there is no possibility the activity may have a significant effect on the environment 199
3 and waived the second reading and adopted Ordinance 25-6 amending Chapter 17.35 of the Municipal Code to improve the public review process for large development projects.
10. Economic Development & Housing
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-50 AMENDING THE BOOK OF FEES TO AND UPDATE
THE URBAN INFILL IMPACT FEE REDUCTION PROGRAM TO INCLUDE SOUTHPORT
INDUSTRIAL PARK AND SEAWAY PROPERTIES
Adopted Resolution 25-50 (Attachment 1) approving an adjustment to the Book of Fees to include the Southport Industrial Park and Seaway properties in the current Urban Infill Impact Fee Reduction Program and delegate certain authorities to implement the reforms to the City Manager and Finance Director.
11. Economic Development & Housing
CONSIDERATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AND RELATED ACTIONS FOR THE GRAND GATEWAY
AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND SELECT ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION AND
TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS
Approved an AHSC Partnership Agreement with E. Smith & Company (“ESC”) in substantially the form included as Attachment 1; approved an Amendment to the Grand Gateway Development Exclusive Negotiating Agreement in substantially the form included as Attachment 2; authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute and deliver a Financing Commitment Letter to ESC pursuant to the AHSC Grant Program requirements for an estimated amount of $3,380,000 in substantially the form shown in Attachment 3; authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute and deliver a Predevelopment Loan Agreement with ESC in the amount of $50,000 based on the Term Sheet in Attachment 4; approved Resolution 25-50, included as Attachment 5, authorizing the transfer of $3,412,000 from Measure V (Fund 109) to various bicycle, pedestrian, and bus shelter capital improvement projects (CIP-14057, CIP-14056, CIP16013, CIP-01349) to serve as gap funding required by the AHSC grant program, an appropriation of $100,000 from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund (Fund 261) to support affordable housing services related to the AHSC affordable housing development, and an appropriation of $50,000 to execute and deliver a Predevelopment Loan Agreement with ESC; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to take any other actions necessary to facilitate the City and ESC’s efforts to apply for the AHSC grant application.
12. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF THE TERMS OF SUCCESSOR AGREEMENT AND ADOPTION OF THE
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO AND THE WEST SACRAMENTO POLICE OFFICER’S ASSOCIATION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 25-54 APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
Approved the terms of the successor agreement and adopt the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of West Sacramento and the West Sacramento Police Officer’s Association effective January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2027; approved the updated Classification Plan (Salary Schedule), Benefits Summary and Memorandum of Understanding (MOU); and adopted Resolution 25-54 approving amendments to the approved biennial budget for Fiscal Year 2024/25 to fund the proposed salary and benefit changes.
13. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF UPDATES TO PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULE, UPDATE AND
APPROVALS OF JOB DESCRIPTIONS AND AUTHORIZED POSITION LIST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025
200
4 Approved the amended and updated publicly available pay schedule (Classification Plan) for Fiscal Year 2024/25; approved the amended and updated Authorized Position List (APL) for Fiscal Year 2024/25; approved the amended and updated Extra Help/Special Events Police Officer Job Description; approved the amended and updated Police Services Coordinator Job Description; and approved the Roads Maintenance Supervisor Job Description.
REGULAR AGENDA
14. Economic Development & Housing
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF PURCHASE, SALE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
WITH RAM COR DEV LLC FOR DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF THE CLUB PHEASANT
PROPERTY
Found that the proposed project included in the Purchase, Sale and Development Agreement is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis under the Class 32 (Infill Development Projects) Categorical Exemption, under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15332 and that the Exemption reflects the independent judgment of the City as lead agency under CEQA; and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute a Purchase, Sale and Development Agreement with Ram Cor Dev LLC for development and use of the Club Pheasant property consistent with the business terms presented in this report.
MOTION: Early SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
PUBLIC HEARINGS
15. Community Development
PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING PROPOSED LIBERTY SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED LAND
USE APPROVALS
Conducted the public hearing; found that the Liberty Specific Plan, the proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Code, and the Southport Framework Plan for the Liberty Project, and the Liberty Development Agreement, are consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the Project and certified and adopted on January 30, 2025 (SCL No. 2016052012); conducted the first reading of Ordinance 25-2 (Attachment 5), by title and number only, adopting the Liberty Specific Plan with revisions proposed by the Applicant in January 2025/Incorporated Settlement Agreement Terms (Attachment 6); conducted the first reading of Ordinance 25-3 (Attachment 6), by title and number only, amending the Zoning Code, Zoning Map, and Southport Framework Plan; adopted Resolution 25-18 (Attachment 7) amending the General Plan 2035; and conducted the first reading of Ordinance 25-4 (Attachment 9), by title and number only, approving a Development Agreement.
MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Early
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED:
Sulpizio Hull; MOTION PASSED
16. Fire
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED REMOVAL OF WEEDS 201
5 Conducted the public hearing to consider objections to the proposed removal of weeds and direct staff to proceed with the 2025 weed abatement program.
MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Early
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
REGULAR AGENDA
17. Parks & Recreation
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 25-42 UPDATING THE CITY OF WEST
SACRAMENTO BOOK OF FEES FOR WATERFRONT ACTIVITIES
Adopted Resolution 25-42 (Attachment 3 updates the Book of Fees for use of the Etenesh Zeleke Public Dock.)
MOTION: Early SECOND: Alcala
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART II
18. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS
There were no reports on Council communications or assignments.
19. PART II
A. Council Calendar
None.
B. City Manager Report
None.
C. City Attorney Report
None.
D. Staff Direction from City Council Members
None.
E. Future Agenda Item Requests by Council
None.
F. Adjourn
202
6 Adjourned at 10:42 p.m.
MOTION: Early SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None);
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on August 20, 2025.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
203
WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL AND
WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND
WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
City Council Regular Meeting
MAY 21, 2025 MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 7:39 p.m.
Present
Mayor Martha Guerrero; Council Member Quirina Orozco; Council Member Norma Alcala; Mayor Pro Tem Verna Sulpizio Hull
Absent
Council Member Dawnte Early
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART I
City Attorney Mitchell reported that the City Council took up the first two items on the Closed Session Agenda and no action was taken.
1. PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WITHIN THE
JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL
The Council is prohibited from discussing issues not on the agenda brought to them at this time.
According to State Law (the Brown Act), items must first be noticed on the agenda before any discussion or action.
The City Council received public comment on items not on the agenda within the City's jurisdiction.
PRESENTATIONS
2. City Manager's Office
PROCLAMATION OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL RECOGNIZING MAY AS
ASIAN AMERICAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER HERITAGE MONTH
City Council presented a proclamation recognizing the month of May as Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) Heritage Month in the City of West Sacramento.
3. City Manager's Office
PROCLAMATION OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL RECOGNIZING MAY 2025 AS
MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS MONTH
City Council presented a proclamation recognizing May 2025 as Mental Health Awareness Month.
4. City Manager's Office
PROCLAMATION OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL RECOGNIZING MAY 11–17, 2025 AS NATIONAL POLICE WEEK AND MAY 15, 2025 AS PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL DAY 204
2 City Council presented a proclamation recognizing May 11–17, 2025 as National Police Week and May 15, 2025 as Peace Officers’ Memorial Day.
CONSENT AGENDA
Approved the Consent Agenda with the exception of Item 5 which was voted on separately.
MOTION: Sulpizio Hull SECOND: Orozco
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Early; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
5. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING REGARDING AND ADOPTION OF LIBERTY
SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED LAND USE APPROVALS
Found that the Liberty Specific Plan, the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code and the Southport Framework Plan for the Liberty Project, and the Liberty Development Agreement, are consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the Project (SCH No. 2016052012) and previously approved by the Planning Commission; waived second reading and adopted Ordinance 25-2 adopting the Liberty Specific Plan; waived second reading and adopted Ordinance 25-3 amending the Zoning Code, Zoning Map, and Southport Framework Plan; and waived second reading and adopted Ordinance 25-4 approving a Development Agreement.
MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Orozco
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Early; RECUSED:
Sulpizio Hull; MOTION PASSED
6. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR ON-DEMAND TRANSIT SERVICE
Approved and authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Memorandum of Understanding with the Sacramento Regional Transit District and Yolo County Transportation District and authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the Memorandum of Understanding with approval from the City Attorney.
7. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT TO KITCHELL CEM FOR ENGINEERING AND
DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE WEST SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY CENTER HVAC REPLACEMENT PROJECT (CIP 52083)
Found that the Community Center HVAC Replacement Project is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to the Categorical Exemption under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1, and find that the determination represents the independent judgment of the City; delegated authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a professional services contract with Kitchell CEM for an amount not to exceed $269,000; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute nonsubstantive changes or modifications to the professional services contract with Kitchell CEM, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments, miscellaneous design costs, or change orders up to 15% ($40,350) of the value of the contract.
205
3 8. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF REJECTION OF ALL BIDS FOR THE FIRE STATION 42 EXTERIOR PAINT
AND REPAIR PROJECT
Rejected all bids for the Fire Station 42 Exterior Paint and Repair Project (24-079-ITB).
9. Economic Development & Housing
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-55 APPROVING MINOR CHANGES TO THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 BUDGET POLICY
Adopted Resolution 25-55 approving minor changes to the EIFD Budget Policy as amended.
10. Finance
CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF THE ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2024 Received an informational report.
11. Finance
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-56 INITIATING THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1
Adopted Resolution 25-56, a Resolution of Intention initiating the levy of annual assessments for the Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1 and establish the date of June 18, 2025 for a public hearing under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
12. Finance
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-57 INITIATING ANNUAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE ACT OF 1937 FOR STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (RALEY’S LANDING)
Adopted Resolution 25-57 initiating annual proceedings and establishing the date for a public hearing to be conducted under the Storm Drain Maintenance District Act of 1937 (the “1937 Act”) for Storm Drain Maintenance District No. 1 (Raley’s Landing).
13. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF RATIFICATION OF STRATEGIC PLAN SUMMARY FOR 2025 Reviewed and ratified the attached 2025 Strategic Plan Summary.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
REGULAR AGENDA
14. Economic Development & Housing
PRESENTATION TO CONSIDER THE 2025 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FOR THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
Heard a presentation from staff and provided direction on the proposed activities for the CDBG Program 2025 Annual Action Plan.
206
4 15. Finance
RESOLUTION 25-43 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
AFFIRMING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE BY THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 OF BONDS IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $80,000,000; APPROVING RELATED PLEDGE AGREEMENT; APPROVING FACILITIES TO BE FINANCED; AND DETERMINING OTHER MATTERS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
Adopted Resolution 25-43 which authorizes the following actions: 1) affirmed and approved the issuance and sale by the EIFD of the City of West Sacramento Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District No. 1 bonds in an amount not to exceed $80,000,000; 2) authorized the execution and delivery of the Pledge Agreement, in substantially the form presented at this meeting; and 3) authorized the appropriate officers of the City to do any and all things and take any and all actions and execute any and all certificates, agreements and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the transactions described in the resolution.
MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Early; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
16. Finance
RESOLUTION 25-44 AFFIRMING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE BY THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 (BRIDGE DISTRICT AREA) OF BONDS IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $6,500,000; APPROVING RELATED PLEDGE AGREEMENT; AND DETERMINING OTHER MATTERS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
Adopted Resolution 24-44 which authorized the following actions: 1) affirmed and approved the issuance and sale by the IFD of the City of West Sacramento Infrastructure Financing District No. 1 bonds in an amount not to exceed $6,500,000; 2) authorized the execution and delivery of the Pledge Agreement, in substantially the form presented at this meeting; and 3) authorized the appropriate officers of the City to do any and all things and take any and all actions and execute any and all certificates, agreements and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the transactions described in the resolution.
MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Early; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
17. Finance
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 25-45 OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO ON BEHALF OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 (BRIDGE DISTRICT AREA) AS ITS LEGISLATIVE BODY RESOLUTION 25-45 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 (BRIDGE DISTRICT AREA) BONDS IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $6,500,000; AND DETERMINING OTHER
MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
The City Council of the City of West Sacramento on behalf of the Infrastructure Financing District No. 1 (Bridge District Area) as its legislative body adopted Resolution 24-45 which authorizes the following actions: 1) approved the issuance and sale by the IFD of the City of West Sacramento Infrastructure Financing District No. 1 bonds in an amount not to exceed $6,500,000; authorized the execution and delivery of the Pledge Agreement, in substantially the form 207
5 presented at this meeting; and 3) authorized the appropriate officers of the City to do any and all things and take any and all actions and execute any and all certificates, agreements and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the transactions described in the resolution.
MOTION: Sulpizio Hull SECOND: Orozco
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Early; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
18. Finance
RESOLUTION OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY APPROVING THE
FORM OF AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF THE BOND PURCHASE
AGREEMENT RELATED TO THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 TAX INCREMENT BONDS; APPROVING
OTHER ACTIONS RELATED TO THE BONDS
Adopted Resolution 25-46 which authorizes the following actions: 1) approved the Bond Purchase Agreement related to the issuance and sale by the EIFD of the City of West Sacramento Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District No. 1 bonds in an amount not to exceed $80,000,000 and 2) authorized the appropriate officers of the Authority to do any and all things and take any and all actions and execute any and all certificates, agreements and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the transactions described in the resolution.
MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Early; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
19. Finance
CONSIDERATION OF WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY RESOLUTION
APPROVING THE FORM OF AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF THE BOND
PURCHASE AGREEMENT RELATED TO THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 (BRIDGE DISTRICT AREA) TAX INCREMENT BONDS; APPROVING OTHER ACTIONS RELATED TO THE BONDS
Adopted Resolution 25-47 which authorizes the following actions: 1) authorized the execution and delivery of the Bond Purchase Agreement in substantially the form presented at this meeting related to the sale of City of West Sacramento Infrastructure District No. 1 bonds in an amount not to exceed $6,500,000 and 2) authorized the appropriate officers of the Authority to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents that they may deem necessary or advisable in order to complete the sale, issuance, and delivery of the Bonds and otherwise to carry out, give effect to, and comply with the terms and intent of this resolution.
MOTION: Sulpizio Hull SECOND: Orozco
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Early; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART II
20. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS
208
6 Mayor Pro Tem Sulpizio Hull reported on the May 1 Executive Commission to Address Homelessness meeting, the May 19 Yolo Subbasin Sustainable Groundwater Agency meeting, and May 19 Yolo Habitat Conservancy meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Sulpizio Hull also reported back on the Cap-to-Cap trip to Washington D.C.
Councilmember Alcala reported on the Cap-to-Cap trip to Washington D.C. and the Senior Resource Fair.
Councilmember Orozco reported on the May 14 Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District Board meeting and spoke about small business incubators.
Mayor Guerrero reported on the May Sacramento Area Council of Governments Transportation Committee meeting and the April meeting of the Yolo Animal Servies Planning Agency JPA.
21. PART II
A. Council Calendar
Assistant City Manager Berlin gave an update on the Council Calendar.
B. City Manager Report
City Manager Laurel gave a City Manager's Report.
C. City Attorney Report
None.
D. Staff Direction from City Council Members
None.
E. Future Agenda Item Requests by Council
City Manager's Office
Request from Mayor Guerrero to issue a proclamation at the June 4, 2025 City Council meeting recognizing June 6th as National Gun Violence Awareness Day Approved request from Mayor Guerrero to issue a proclamation at the June 4, 2025 City Council meeting recognizing June 6th as National Gun Violence Awareness Day.
MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Orozco
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Early; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
City Manager's Office
Request from Councilmember Early to invite the Yolo Community Foundation to give a presentation at a future City Council meeting on the 2025 State of the Sector Report Approved request from Councilmember Early to invite the Yolo Community Foundation to give a presentation at a future City Council meeting on the 2025 State of the Sector Report. 209
7 MOTION: Orozco SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Early; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
F. Adjourn
Adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on August 20, 2025.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
210
WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL AND
WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND
WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
City Council Regular Meeting
JUNE 4, 2025 MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 7:39 p.m.
Present
Mayor Martha Guerrero; Mayor Pro Tem Verna Sulpizio Hull; Council Member Quirina Orozco; Council Member Norma Alcala; Council Member Dawnte Early GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART I
City Attorney Mitchell reported that the City Council met in a Closed Session and no action was taken.
1. PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WITHIN THE
JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL
The Council is prohibited from discussing issues not on the agenda brought to them at this time.
According to State Law (the Brown Act), items must first be noticed on the agenda before any discussion or action.
The City Council received public comment on items not on the agenda within the City's jurisdiction.
PRESENTATIONS
2. City Manager's Office
PROCLAMATION OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL RECOGNIZING JUNE 2025 AS
PRIDE MONTH
City Council presented a proclamation recognizing June 2025 as Pride Month and approve the flying of the Rainbow Flag at City Hall throughout the month of June 2025.
3. City Manager's Office
CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING JUNE 6, 2025 AS NATIONAL GUN VIOLENCE
AWARENESS DAY
City Council presented a proclamation recognizing June 6, 2025, as National Gun Violence Awareness Day.
CONSENT AGENDA
Approved the Consent Agenda with the exception of items 6 and 9 which were voted on separately.
MOTION: Early SECOND: Orozco
Roll Call Vote
211
2 YES: Guerrero, Early, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
4. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 25-62 SUPPORTING THE SUBMISSION
OF AN APPLICATION TO THE SACOG FOUR-COUNTY STATE FUNDING PROGRAM FOR THE NORTH 5TH STREET COMPLETE STREETS AND CONNECTIVITY PROJECT (CIP 16013) Adopted Resolution 25-62 to indicate to SACOG the City’s firm commitment to deliver the North 5th Street Complete Streets and Connectivity Project (CIP 16013) on time, and to ensure accountability and alignment with SACOG program goals, timelines, and commitments.
5. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF REJECTION OF ALL BIDS FOR THE HIGH SERVICE MANIFOLD
REPAIR/REPLACEMENT/VAULT INSTALLATION PROJECT
(CIP 21041)
Rejected all bids for the High Service Manifold Repair/Replacement/Vault Installation Project (CIP 21041) at the George Kristoff Water Treatment Plant (25-004-ITB).
6. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF SETTING THE VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN A REDUCTION GOAL FOR
FATAL AND SERIOUS INJURY CRASHES
Directed staff to prepare a draft Vision Zero Action Plan that will achieve a 50% reduction in fatal and serious injury crashes by 2035 and continuously reduce fatal and serious injury crashes thereafter.
MOTION: Sulpizio Hull SECOND: Orozco
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
7. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO GHD, INC.
FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE SACRAMENTO AVENUE CORRIDOR INFILL AND
INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY, NEEDS, AND FINANCING PLAN AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 25-65 APPROVING RELATED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS (CIP 10048) Awarded a contract for professional services with GHD, Inc. for the Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill and Infrastructure Capacity, Needs, and Financing Plan; authorized the City Manager, or their designee, to execute a professional services contract with GHD, Inc. in the amount of $538,661 for the Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill and Infrastructure Capacity, Needs, and Financing Plan; authorized the City Manager, or their designee, to make non-substantive changes or modifications to the Contract for Services, with approval from the City Attorney; authorized the City Manager, or their designee, to execute amendments up to 10% ($53,866.10) of the total contract amount; approved Resolution 25-65 authorizing the transfer of $108,866 from the Measure N Fund - Community Improvement Funds to support the project budget (CIP 10048); and delegated authority to the City Manager, or their designee, to execute amendments to extend the term of the contract, if necessary, and to approve and incorporate additional tasks.
8. Economic Development & Housing
WEST SACRAMENTO CHAMBER ANNUAL REPORT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES FROM JANUARY 1, 2024, THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2024
212
3 As this is an informational item, no action is required.
9. Economic Development & Housing
CONSIDERATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT WITH SEECON FINANCIAL & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., FOR THE NEWPORT 13 PROJECT
Found that this proposal is Categorically Exempt from CEQA under Class 5 (Section 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines) and Class 32 (In-fill Development Projects) Categorical Exemptions as the appropriate level of review under CEQA; approved the Affordable Housing Agreement with Seecon Financial & Construction Co., Inc., in substantially the form included as Attachment 1 for the Newport 13 project (Agreement); and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute the Agreement and make non-substantive changes, including extensions, corrections or modifications with the approval of the City Attorney.
MOTION: Early SECOND: Orozco
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
10. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 5, 2025, MARCH 19, 2025, AND APRIL 9, 2025 REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL,
REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AND WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING
AUTHORITY
Approved the minutes of the March 5, 2025, March 19, 2025, and April 9, 2025 Regular Meetings of the West Sacramento City Council, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and West Sacramento Financing Authority as amended by the errata memo.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
11. City Manager's Office
PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 3502.3 FOR REPORT ON
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO VACANCIES, AND RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION EFFORTS Conducted the public hearing; and received the informational report on City of West Sacramento Vacancies, and Recruitment and Retention Efforts Pursuant to Government Code Section 3502.3.
12. Community Development
A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 25-7 REGARDING PROPOSED ANNUAL OMNIBUS ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
Conducted public hearing; found that the project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to §15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) and §15321 (Enforcement Actions by Regulatory Agencies) exemption of the CEQA Guidelines; and conducted the first reading of Ordinance 25-7, by title and number only, amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Municipal Code for the annual omnibus code amendments.
MOTION: Sulpizio Hull SECOND: Alcala
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
213
4 REGULAR AGENDA
13. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-49 ADOPTING THE CLIMATE ACTION AND
ADAPTATION PLAN
Received a presentation by staff on the proposed Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) and take public comment; found that adoption of the CAAP is within the scope of the EIR and SEIR prepared for the 2035 General Plan and no new or substantially more adverse impacts would occur through implementation of the proposed project, pursuant to Sections 15168 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and adopted Resolution 25-49 which will approve the CAAP.
MOTION: Early SECOND: Alcala
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART II
14. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS
Councilmember Early reported on the Sacramento Area Council of Governments and Yolo Transportation District meeting, as well as a local Federal Congressional panel that was held in West Sacramento.
Councilmember Orozco reported on the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District Board meeting held May 28.
Mayor Guerrero spoke about the California Green Technology Initiative.
15. PART II
A. Council Calendar
Assistant City Manager Berlin gave an update to the Council Calendar.
B. City Manager Report
City Manager Laurel gave the City Manager report.
C. City Attorney Report
None.
D. Staff Direction from City Council Members
None.
E. Future Agenda Item Requests by Council
None.
214
5 F. Adjourn
Adjourned at 10:41 p.m.
MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Early
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on August 20, 2025.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
215
WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL AND
WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND
WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
City Council Regular Meeting
JUNE 18, 2025 MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 7:11 p.m.
Present
Mayor Martha Guerrero; Mayor Pro Tem Verna Sulpizio Hull; Council Member Norma Alcala; Council Member Dawnte Early
Absent
Council Member Quirina Orozco
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART I
1. PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WITHIN THE
JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL
The Council is prohibited from discussing issues not on the agenda brought to them at this time.
According to State Law (the Brown Act), items must first be noticed on the agenda before any discussion or action.
The City Council received public comment on items not on the agenda within the City's jurisdiction.
PRESENTATIONS
2. City Manager's Office
PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING TOM RAMOS FOR HIS LONGTIME SERVICE ON THE WEST
SACRAMENTO AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY BOARD
City Council presented a proclamation recognizing Tom Ramos for his service on the WSAFCA Board and his commitment to advancing flood protection in West Sacramento.
3. City Manager's Office
PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING JUNE 19TH AS JUNETEENTH
NATIONAL FREEDOM DAY
City Council presented a proclamation recognizing June 19 as Juneteenth National Freedom Day in the City of West Sacramento.
4. City Manager's Office
PRESENTATION BY THE YOUTH CLIMATE ACTION BOARD
City Council received a presentation from the Youth Climate Action Board.
CONSENT AGENDA
Approved the Consent Agenda.
216
2 MOTION: Sulpizio Hull SECOND: Alcala
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
5. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS FOR ONCALL RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVICES WITH CMD WEST- MAVERICK ALLIANCE COMPANY, INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP, INC., AND MONUMENT ROW, INC.
Approved the proposed professional services contracts with CMD West-Maverick Alliance Company, lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc., and Monument ROW, Inc. for on-call professional right of way services for City projects; delegated authority to the City Manager or his designee, to execute the contracts substantially in the form attached; authorized the City manager to issue notices to proceed, approve minor amendments to the Scope of Services and execute nonsubstantive changes and modifications, with approval from the City Attorney; authorized the City Manager or designee to execute amendments or change orders and adjust compensation within the Council-approved budget; and authorized the City Manager or designee to execute amendments to extend the term of the contract and adjust compensation within the limits of the Council-approved budget.
6. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 25-75 REGARDING THE EMERGENCY
CONTRACT AND AWARD OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH ACCO ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER HVAC PROJECT (CIP 52083) Found that Community Center HVAC Repair project is exempt from CEQA analysis under CEQA Guidelines 15269. According to the CEQA Guidelines, an emergency includes emergency repairs to public or privately owned service facilities necessary to maintain service essential to the public health, safety, or welfare; adopted, by a minimum four-fifths vote of the Council, Resolution 25-75, regarding the Emergency Contract with ACCO Engineered Systems, Inc. for the Community Center HVAC Repair Project; approved the contract with ACCO Engineered Systems, Inc. to provide emergency HVAC repair services at the West Sacramento Community Center; authorized the City Manager or designee to execute an emergency contract for services in an amount not to exceed $35,099 with approval from the City Attorney; authorized the City Manager or designee to execute amendments or change orders on the contract; authorized the City Manager or designee to execute non-substantive changes and modifications, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager or designee to extend the contract term and adjust compensation, within the limits of the Council-approved budget.
7. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 25-74 REGARDING THE EMERGENCY
CONTRACT AND AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH SUBZERO HVAC
SERVICES FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT HVAC EMERGENCY INSTALLATION PROJECT (CIP 50004)
Found that Police Department HVAC Emergency Installation project is exempt from CEQA analysis under CEQA Guidelines 15269. According to the CEQA Guidelines, an emergency includes emergency repairs to public or privately owned service facilities necessary to maintain service essential to the public health, safety, or welfare; adopted, by a minimum four-fifths vote of the Council, Resolution 25-74, regarding the Emergency Contract with SubZero HVAC Services for the Police Department HVAC Emergency Installation Project; approved the contract with Subzero HVAC Services to provide HVAC installation services at the City of West Sacramento Police Department; authorized the City Manager or designee to execute an emergency contract for services in an amount not to exceed $18.653.00 with approval from the 217
3 City Attorney; authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute amendments or change orders up to 10-15% of the contract; authorized the City Manager or designee to execute nonsubstantive changes and modifications, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager or designee to extend the contract term and adjust compensation, within the limits of the Council-approved budget.
8. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 5 WITH CONSOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. FOR THE SYCAMORE TRAIL EXTENSION PHASE II PROJECT (CIP 14021) Approved and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 5 to the construction management contract with Consor in the amount of $250,000 for the Sycamore Trail Extension Phase II Project; authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute amendments or change orders up to 10% of the contract amendment amount ($25,000); authorized the City Manager to execute non-substantive changes or modifications, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute amendments to further extend the term of the contract, if necessary.
9. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 25-66 ESTABLISHING A LIST OF FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 PROJECTS FUNDED BY SENATE BILL 1 (SB1): THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT
Adopted Resolution 25-66 establishing and approving the list of FY 2025/26 projects to be funded with the State Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA/SB1) revenues and authorized staff to submit the list to the State of California Transportation Commission (CTC).
10. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-64 CONSENTING TO THE WITHDRAWAL OF RECLAMATION DISTRICT 537 FROM THE WEST SACRAMENTO AREA FLOOD CONTROL
AGENCY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
Approved Resolution 25-64, authorizing the withdrawal of Reclamation District 537 (RD 537) from the WSAFCA Joint Powers Agreement.
11. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 25-70 SUPPORTING AN ADDENDUM TO
THE SOUTHPORT SACRAMENTO RIVER EARLY IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SOUTHPORT LEVEE RECREATION TRAIL PROJECT (CIP 62147)
Adopted Resolution 25-70, approving an Addendum to the Southport Sacramento River Early Implementation Project Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2011082069) for the Southport Levee Recreation Trail Project (CIP 62147); approved the Southport Levee Recreation Trail Project (CIP 62147); and authorized the City Manager or designee to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with CEQA.
12. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO VSS INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE 2025 PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROJECT (CIP 17029)
Found that a Class 1 exemption under California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Article 19, Section 15301 is the appropriate level of environmental review for CEQA for the construction of the 2025 Pavement Preservation Project; approved the Project Plans and Specifications for the 2025 Pavement Preservation Project (CIP 17029); awarded a construction 218
4 contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, VSS International, Inc.; delegated Authority to the City Manager, or his designee to execute a construction contract with VSS International, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $2,238,850; authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute non-substantive changes or modifications, amendments, change orders, agreements, and purchases up to 20% of the construction contract ($447,770) with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to extend the term of the construction contract with VSS International, Inc., if necessary.
13. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-51 APPROVING THE FINAL MAP, SUBDIVISION
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION 5142, NEWPORT ESTATES UNIT 13
Adopted Resolution 25-51, approving the Final Map for Newport Estates Unit 13, Subdivision 5142; approved the associated Subdivision Improvement Agreement; approved a Development Reimbursement Agreement; and authorized the City Manager or designee to execute all agreements listed in this agenda report.
14. Finance
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-60 AUTHORIZING THE COLLECTION OF SPECIAL TAX
ON THE SECURED TAX ROLL IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE ORDINARY AD VALOREM
PROPERTY TAXES IN ORDER TO PAY FOR CERTAIN MAINTENANCE SERVICES Adopted Resolution 25-60 authorizing the collection of special tax to pay for certain Community Facility District services on the secured tax roll in the same manner as the ordinary ad valorem property taxes.
15. Finance
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-61 AUTHORIZING THE COLLECTION OF SPECIAL TAX
ON THE SECURED ROLL IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE ORDINARY AD VALOREM
PROPERTY TAXES FOR EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITY DISTRICTS FOR AUTHORIZED
CAPITAL FACILITY CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
Adopted Resolution 25-61 authorizing the collection of a special tax and to place these taxes on the secured tax roll to be collected in the same manner as the ordinary ad valorem property taxes. Furthermore, the actions recognize that the collection of taxes will be used to pay outstanding bond debt and other purposes previously authorized by the City.
16. Finance
CONSIDERATION OF THE TREASURER’S QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT ON THE CITY’S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 2025 Received and filed the Treasurer’s Quarterly Financial Report on the City’s investment portfolio for the period ending March 31, 2025.
17. Public Works
CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF A CONTRACT FOR SERVICES WITH PRIDE INDUSTRIES
ONE FOR JANITORIAL SERVICES AT CITY FACILITIES
Awarded a contract for janitorial and cleaning services at City facilities to PRIDE Industries One; authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the Contract for Services with approval from the City Attorney; authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute amendments or change orders up to 10% of the contract amount; and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute amendments to extend the term of the contract.
219
5 18. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE UPDATED AGE-FRIENDLY ACTION PLAN Approved the updated Age-Friendly Action Plan.
19. City Manager's Office
WEST SACRAMENTO FOUNDATION COLLABORATION WITH CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
PROGRAMS SERVING CHILDREN AND YOUTH
Approved the collaboration with the West Sacramento Foundation, and direct staff to provide services necessary to expand the impact of programs serving children and youth in our city.
20. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF THE TOTAL TENTATIVE AGREEMENT ON ECONOMIC
TERMS FOR THE SUCCESSOR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO AND THE WEST SACRAMENTO FIREFIGHTER’S ASSOCIATION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 25-73 APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
Approved the total tentative agreement on terms for a successor Memorandum of Understanding between the City of West Sacramento and the West Sacramento Firefighter’s Association effective July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2028; adopted Resolution 25-73 approving amendments to the budget for Fiscal Year 2025/26 to fund the proposed salary and benefit changes; and approved the updated Benefits Summary for the FFA.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
21. Community Development
PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING AN APPEAL TO PROPOSED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5247 AT 3071 DAVIS ROAD
Opened the public hearing and continued the appeal of TPM No. 5247 to a date uncertain, but no less than 30 days after a request to set a hearing date is received.
MOTION: Sulpizio Hull SECOND: Alcala
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Early, Orozco; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
22. Economic Development & Housing
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION 25-67 ADOPTING THE 2025-2026 ANNUAL
ACTION PLAN FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Conducted a public hearing and, upon closing the hearing, approved Resolution 25-67, adopting the 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan for the use of federal CDBG funding.
MOTION: Early SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
23. Finance
220
6 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-59 CONFIRMING THE
DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (RALEY’S LANDING)
Conducted a public hearing; approved the Storm Drain District No. 1 Report for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 with budget and fee schedule; and adopted Resolution 25-59 confirming the diagram and assessment and ordering improvements (maintenance) to be made for the Storm Drain Maintenance District No. 1.
MOTION: Early SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
24. Finance
PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-58 CONFIRMING THE
DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS (MAINTENANCE) TO BE MADE FOR THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1
Conducted a public hearing; approved the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1 Report for 2025- 2026 with budget and fee schedule; and adopted Resolution 25-58 confirming diagram and assessment, and ordering improvements (maintenance) to be made for the Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1.
MOTION: Early SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
REGULAR AGENDA
25. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR CITY
MANAGER
Approved the June 18, 2025 Amended and Restated City Manager Employment Agreement between the City Council and Aaron Laurel for the position of City Manager.
MOTION: Sulpizio Hull SECOND: Early
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Sulpizio Hull; NO: Alcala; ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
26. Finance
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-71 ADOPTING THE OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE (O&M) AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 Item 26 was presented before the Public Hearing items.
Adopted Resolution 25-71 approving the Operations & Maintenance and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) midyear budget for FY 2025/26; approved the amended Authorized Positions List (APL); and approved the amended Salary Schedule.
221
7 MOTION: Early SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART II
27. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS
Councilmember Early spoke about the Fire and Police Academy graduation ceremonies.
Councilmember Alcala reported on the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District meeting and Indigifest.
Mayor Guerrero reported on the City/School District 2x2 meeting and the upcoming U.S.
Conference of Mayors.
28. PART II
A. Council Calendar
No report.
B. City Manager Report
City Manger Laural gave the City Manager's Report.
C. City Attorney Report
None.
D. Staff Direction from City Council Members
None.
E. Future Agenda Item Requests by Council
None.
F. Adjourn
Adjourned at 9:23 p.m.
MOTION: Early SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
222
8 Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on August 20, 2025.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
223
WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL AND
WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND
WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
City Council Regular Meeting
JULY 16, 2025 MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m.
Present
Mayor Martha Guerrero; Mayor Pro Tem Verna Sulpizio Hull; Council Member Quirina Orozco; Council Member Norma Alcala; Council Member Dawnte Early GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART I
1. PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WITHIN THE
JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL
The Council is prohibited from discussing issues not on the agenda brought to them at this time.
According to State Law (the Brown Act), items must first be noticed on the agenda before any discussion or action.
The City Council received public comment on items not on the agenda within the City's jurisdiction.
PRESENTATIONS
2. City Manager's Office
PRESENTATION BY SACRAMENTO-YOLO MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT City Council received a presentation by the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito & Vector Control District.
3. City Manager's Office
YOLO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION STATE OF THE NONPROFIT INDUSTRY City Council received a presentation by the Yolo Community Foundation regarding the state of the nonprofit industry.
4. Parks & Recreation
PRESENTATION BY WEST SAC PLAY
City Council received a presentation provided by the non-profit organization, West Sac Play, that highlights the financial contributions and positive impact West Sac Play has on the City of West Sacramento Parks.
CONSENT AGENDA
Approved the Consent Agenda with the exception of items 12 and 16 which were voted on separately.
MOTION: Early SECOND: Alcala
224
2 Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
5. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT AWARD WITH CRUSADER FENCE CO. FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF FENCING FOR THE ALYCE NORMAN PARK SOFTBALL FIELD–
BACKSTOP REPLACEMENT PROJECT
(CIP 62161)
Found that approval of a construction contract for replacement of the backstop fence and accessories for the Alyce Norman Park - Backstop Replacement Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Categorical Exemptions under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Divisions 6, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Section 15301; approved and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a Construction Contract with Crusader Fence Co. for the replacement of the backstop fence for the Alyce Norman Park - Backstop Project in the amount of $108,925; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendments or change orders up to 10% (10,893) of the contract amendment value; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the construction contract, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to extend the term of the contract, if necessary.
6. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 4 WITH VERDE DESIGN INC., FOR THE BRYTE PARK MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT (CIP 62138) Approved and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 4 to the professional services contract with Verde Designs Inc. in the amount of $179,000 for the Bryte Park Master Plan Implementation Project; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to further extend the term of the contract, if necessary.
7. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2 WITH CWE FOR THE
WEST CAPITOL AVENUE REGIONAL CONNECTION BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AND PARK BOULEVARD CLASS 2 BICYCLE LANES AND CROSSING RESTRIPING PROJECT (CIP 14057 & 14064)
Found that a Class 1 exemption under California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Article 19, Section 15301 is the appropriate level of environmental review for CEQA for the construction of the Park Boulevard Class 2 Bicycle Lanes and Crossing Restriping Project; approved and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 2 to the design services contract with CWE in the amount of $46,600 for the Park Boulevard Class 2 Bicycle Lanes and Crossing Restriping Project (CIP 14064); authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute amendments or change orders up to 20% of the contract amendment amount ($9,320); authorized the City Manager to execute non-substantive changes or modifications, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager or his designee to execute amendments to further extend the term of the contract.
8. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 25-69 AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP); AND APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AWARD TO SIERRA 225
3 SERVICES FOR THE ALYCE NORMAN PARK BASEBALL PLAYFIELD CONVERSION PROJECT (CIP 62162)
Found that the Alyce Norman Park Baseball Playfield Conversion Project (CIP 62162) is exempt from review under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15301(d) (Existing Facilities); adopted Resolution 25-69 approving an amendment to the Capital Improvement Program budget by transferring funds from the Alyce Norman Park Master Plan (CIP 62160) to the Alyce Norman Park Playfield Conversion Project (CIP 62162); approved and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a Construction Contract with Sierra Services for the conversion of the Little League baseball field to a multi-purpose field for the Alyce Norman Park Playfield Conversion Project in the amount of $84,092; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendments or change orders up to 10% ($8,410) of the contract amendment value; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute nonsubstantive changes or modifications to the construction contract, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to extend the term of the contract, if necessary.
9. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF A CONTRACT FOR SERVICES TO NEXTGEN ALPHA
UPFITTING FOR THE INSTALLATION OF VEHICLE KIT FOR THE EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION (EVP) PROJECT (CIP 12026)
Found that the Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) project is exempt from environmental review under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15301 Class 1 (b) of the California Environmental Quality Act; approved a contract for services with NextGen Alpha Upfitting, in an amount not to exceed $476,728.74 for the Installation of Vehicle Kit for the Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) Project (CIP 12026); authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract for services with NextGen Alpha Upfitting, for an amount not to exceed $476,728.74; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications, amendments, change orders, agreements and/or purchases up to 20% ($95,345.75) of the contract amount; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to extend the term of the contract, if necessary.
10. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-76 APPROVING THE SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
PLAN (SSMP)
Approved Resolution 25-76 approving the Sewer System Management Plan Update.
11. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO NN ENGINEERING, INC. FOR PREPARATION OF THE BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND TRAILS MASTER PLAN UPDATE (CIP 61006) AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 25-79 APPROVING
RELATED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
Awarded a contract for professional services with NN Engineering, Inc. for the preparation of the 2035 Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan Update; authorized the City Manager, or their designee, to execute a professional services contract with NN Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $288,340 for the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan Update; authorized the City Manager, or their designee, to make contract amendments up to $28,834; approved Resolution 25-79 authorizing the transfer of $28,834 from the Traffic Improvement Fund to support the unexpected contingencies that may arise in the preparation of the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan Update; authorized the City Manager or their designee to execute non-substantive changes and modifications, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager or their designee to extend the contract term and adjust compensation, within the limits of the Council-approved budget.
226
4 12. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF FINDING OF A PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY FOR A TYPE 21 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE AT 45 15th STREET (ARCO) Found that a Public Convenience or Necessity would be served by the issuance of a Type 21 Alcoholic Beverage Control License at 45 15th Street and authorized the Mayor to execute and staff to submit a letter of determination of a Public Convenience or Necessity to the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.
MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Sulpizio Hull
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: Early, Orozco; ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: (None); RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
13. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-78 APPROVING FINAL MAP 5242, BRIDGE DISTRICT PHASE 6, FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES AND AMENDMENTS TO THE BARN SITE AND
FACILITIES LEASE AGREEMENTS
Adopted Resolution 25-78, approving Final Map 5242, Bridge District Phase 6, for condominium purposes and authorized the City Manager to execute amendments to the Barn Site and Facilities Lease agreements to conform with the Final Map and as-built improvements.
14. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 25-7 REGARDING PROPOSED ANNUAL OMNIBUS ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF
THE MUNICIPAL CODE
Found that the proposed annual omnibus code amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Municipal Code is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to §15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) and §15321 (Enforcement Actions by Regulatory Agencies) of the CEQA Guidelines; and waived the second reading and adopted Ordinance 25- 7 amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Municipal Code for the annual omnibus zoning code amendments.
15. Parks & Recreation
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 25-68 APPROVING THE APPLICATION
FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS FOR THE
ARLINGTON NEIGHBORHOOD PARK PROJECT
Found that this project is exempt from further environmental review to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15016 (transfer of Ownership of Land in Order to Create Parks); adopted Resolution 25-68 approving an application to California State Parks for the Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant program to fund the Arlington Neighborhood Park Project; and adopted the Notice of Exemption and direct staff to file it with the County Recorder and the State Clearinghouse.
16. Parks & Recreation
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 25-72 AMENDING THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET, APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, AND AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO IMAGECON, INC FOR THE HERITAGE OAKS PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (CIP 62134) Found that approval of a construction contract with Imagecon, Inc is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Categorical Exemptions under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Divisions 6, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Sections 15301, 15303, and 227
5 15304, and found that the determination represents the independent judgement of the City; adopted Resolution 25-72 amending the Capital Improvement Program budget (Attachment 1); awarded a contract for construction services to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Imagecon, Inc in the amount not to exceed $4,147,748 for the Heritage Oaks Park Master Plan Implementation Project (Attachment 2); authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction contract with Imagecon, Inc in the amount of $4,147,748; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to make contract amendments up to 20% ($829,550) of the total contract value; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the contract, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to extend the term of the contract, if necessary.
MOTION: Sulpizio Hull SECOND: Early
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
17. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF THE SUCCESSOR MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO AND THE WEST SACRAMENTO FIREFIGHTER’S ASSOCIATION
Adopted the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of West Sacramento and West Sacramento Firefighters’ Association, effective July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2028 and authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute the Joinder Agreement for West Sacramento Firefighters’ Association members to participate in the "IAFF Medical Expense Reimbursement Plan”, as outlined in the MOU.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
18. Finance
PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-77 CERTIFYING INCLUSION
OF DELINQUENT CHARGES AND PENALTIES FOR WATER, SEWER AND REFUSE SERVICES
ON THE SECURED TAX ROLL IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE GENERAL TAXES AND
DIRECTING THAT A LIEN ALSO BE PLACED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES Conducted a public hearing and closed the public hearing and adopted Resolution 25-77 certifying inclusion of delinquent charges and penalties for water, sewer and refuse services on the secured tax roll in the same manner as the general taxes and directing that a lien also be placed on the subject properties.
MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Early
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT:
(None); RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
19. Fire
PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-36 CERTIFYING THE LIST OF
WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES, DIRECTING THAT A LIEN BE PLACED ON THE SUBJECT
PROPERTIES AND REQUESTING INCLUSION OF THESE CHARGES ON THE SECURED TAX
ROLL IN ORDER THAT THEY MAY BE COLLECTED IN THE SAME MANNER AS GENERAL TAXES
228
6 Opened the public hearing to receive public comment on the charges for mandatory weed abatement services initiated by the City and adopted Resolution 25-36 certifying the list of weed abatement charges and direct the Yolo County Auditor to add the expenses to the individual tax rolls.
MOTION: Sulpizio Hull SECOND: Orozco
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Orozco, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Early; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
REGULAR AGENDA
20. Community Development
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP ON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS ENHANCEMENTS AND
REVIEW OF THE BOOK OF FEES UPDATE
Received a presentation and provided feedback on current and proposed development review enhancements and received an informational summary of the Community Development Department user fee updates recommended through the Matrix Consulting Group Fee Study.
21. Parks & Recreation
WORKSHOP ON PROPOSED COST RECOVERY METHODOLOGY FOR THE PARKS AND
RECREATION BOOK OF FEE UPDATE
Conducted a workshop on the proposed cost recovery goals for the Parks and Recreation Department.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART II
22. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS
Councilmember Orozco reported on the June 11 and July 9 meetings of the Sacramento Area Sewer District Board, formerly the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District Board, meetings.
Mayor Guerrero reported on the Yolo Animal Servies Planning Agency JPA meeting.
23. PART II
A. Council Calendar
No report.
B. City Manager Report
City Manager Laurel gave the City Manager's report.
C. City Attorney Report
None.
D. Staff Direction from City Council Members
229
7 None.
E. Future Agenda Item Requests by Council
None.
F. Adjourn
Adjourned at 11:14 p.m.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on August 20, 2025.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
230
WEST SACRAMENTO CITY COUNCIL AND
WEST SACRAMENTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND
WEST SACRAMENTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
City Council Regular Meeting
AUGUST 6, 2025 MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m.
Present
Mayor Martha Guerrero; Council Member Dawnte Early; Council Member Norma Alcala; Mayor Pro Tem Verna Sulpizio Hull
Absent
Council Member Quirina Orozco
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART I
1. PRESENTATIONS BY THE PUBLIC ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA WITHIN THE
JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL
The Council is prohibited from discussing issues not on the agenda brought to them at this time.
According to State Law (the Brown Act), items must first be noticed on the agenda before any discussion or action.
The City Council received public comment on items not on the agenda within the City's jurisdiction.
PRESENTATIONS
None.
CONSENT AGENDA
Approved the Consent Agenda.
MOTION: Alcala SECOND: Early
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
2. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-87 APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE PROJECT
BUDGET AND APPROVAL OF SERVICES CONTRACT FOR CALLANDER ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC. FOR THE DESIGN OF THE ALYCE NORMAN PARK MASTER PLAN (CIP 62160)
Adopted Resolution 25-87 approving a budget amendment to fully fund the Alyce Norman Park Master Plan project (CIP 62160); approved the services contracts with Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. for the design of the Alyce Norman Park Master Plan in the amount of $187,526; authorized the City manager, or his designee, to issue a notice to proceed and 231
2 execute non-substantive changes and modifications, with approval from the City Attorney; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments or change orders and adjust compensation within the Council-approved budget; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendments or change orders up to $37,505.20; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to extend the term of the contract, if necessary.
3. Capital Projects
CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT AWARD WITH SWEETWATER CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE ETENESH ZELEKE PUBLIC DOCK DEBRIS DEFLECTOR REPAIR PROJECT (CIP 62157) Found that the Etenesh Zeleke Public Dock Debris Deflector Repair Project (CIP 62157) is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the Categorical Exemptions under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Sections 15301, and find that the determination represents the independent judgment of the City; awarded a construction contract to Sweetwater Construction Inc. for the repair of the debris deflector for the Etenesh Zeleke Boat Dock in the amount of $335,000; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendments or change orders up to 20% ($67,000) of the contract amendment value; authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the construction contract, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to extend the term of the contract, if necessary.
4. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-80 APPROVING 2370/2400 HARMON ROAD PARCEL MAP NO. 5225
Adopted Resolution 25-80, approving 2370/2400 Harmon Road Parcel Map 5225.
5. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-18 APPROVING FINAL MAP 5235, “MARSHALL ROAD SUBDIVISION” ALONG WITH THE ASSOCIATED SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Adopted Resolution 25-81 approving Final Map 5235, “Marshall Road Subdivision”, and the associated Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
6. Community Development
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-82 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED TO DATE FOR SUBDIVISION 5211 AND SUBDIVISION 4936, "FOUR40 WEST" Adopted Resolution 25-82, accepting the public improvements completed to date for Subdivision 5211 and Subdivision 4936.
7. Public Works
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 25-86 REGARDING THE EMERGENCY
CONTRACT AND AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH EXPRESS SEWER & DRAIN FOR THE SUTTER STREET SEWER LINE COLLAPSE (CIP 31007) Found that the Sutter Street Sewer Line Collapse Repair Project is exempt from CEQA analysis under CEQA Guidelines Section 15269. According to the CEQA Guidelines, an emergency includes emergency repairs to public or privately owned service facilities necessary to maintain service essential to the public health, safety, or welfare; adopted, by a minimum four-fifths vote of the Council, Resolution 25-86 regarding the Emergency Contract with Express Sewer & Drain for the Sutter Street Sewer Line Collapse Repair; approved the contract with Express Sewer & Drain to provide emergency sewer line repair at Sutter Street; authorized the City Manager or designee to execute an emergency contract for service in an amount not to exceed $39,000.00; authorized the City Manager or designee to execute amendments or change orders on the 232
3 contract; authorized the City Manager or designee to execute non-substantive changes and modifications, with approval from the City Attorney; and authorized the City Manager or designee to extend the contract term and adjust compensation, within the limits of the Council-approved budget for CIP 31007.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
REGULAR AGENDA
8. City Manager's Office
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-89, PROPOSED CHANGES TO BENEFIT SUMMARIES
FOR UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEE GROUPS, UPDATES TO THE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26, AND UPDATES TO THE AUTHORIZED POSITION LIST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
Approved the amended and updated Authorized Position List (APL) for Fiscal Year 2025/26; approved the amended and updated publicly available pay schedule (Classification Plan) for Fiscal Year 2025/26; approved the updated benefit summaries for the City Council, Specialists and Professionals, Confidential, Management, Safety Management and Executive Management groups; and approved Resolution 25-89 authorizing budget appropriations to fund the changes proposed in the Benefit Summaries, revised APL, and revised Classification Plan.
MOTION: Early SECOND: Alcala
Roll Call Vote
YES: Guerrero, Early, Alcala, Sulpizio Hull; NO: (None); ABSTAIN: (None); ABSENT: Orozco; RECUSED: (None); MOTION PASSED
9. Parks & Recreation
PRESENTATION ON BRYTE PARK MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION FUNDING STRATEGY Received a presentation by staff and conducted a workshop on the proposed Bryte Park Master Plan Implementation funding strategy and provided direction to staff.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FUNCTION – PART II
10. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS / ASSIGNMENTS
Councilmember Early reported on the Yolo Transportation District meeting, the upcoming Sacramento Area Council of Governments Transportation Committee meeting, and the Yolo County Housing Authority meeting.
Councilmember Alcala reported on the Yolo Solano Air Quality District youth art contest and district meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Sulpizio Hull gave an update on staffing for the Yolo Habitat Conservancy and National Night Out.
Mayor Guerrero reported on National Night Out.
11. PART II
A. Council Calendar
233
4 No report.
B. City Manager Report
No report.
C. City Attorney Report
No report.
D. Staff Direction from City Council Members
No report.
E. Future Agenda Item Requests by Council
No report.
F. Adjourn
Adjourned at 8:54 p.m.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
Minutes approved as presented by a majority
vote of the City Council on August 20, 2025.
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
234
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2025 ITEM # 8
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING AN APPEAL TO PROPOSED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5247 AT 3071 DAVIS ROAD
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [ ] Staff
[X] Other
Elijah Ortega, AICP, Associate Planner
Community Development Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this item is to facilitate the City Council’s review of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 5247 to create four parcels from one existing ±5-acre parcel at 3071 Davis Road.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the Council:
1. Conduct the public hearing regarding an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of TPM No. 5247; and
2. Adopt Resolution 25-67:
a. Finding that the proposed project is within the scope of the EIR and SEIR prepared for the General Plan and no new or substantially more adverse impacts would occur through implementation of the proposed project, pursuant to Sections 15183, 15162, and 15168(c)(2) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
b. Denying the appeal and confirming the Planning Commission’s approval of TPM No. 5247.
BACKGROUND
The project site at 3071 Davis Road (APN: 045-212-013-000) is zoned Residential Rural Estates (RE). The neighborhood consists of large agricultural properties ranging between 0.1 and 10 acres and contains clusters of single-family residential homes on Seymour and Gladys avenues and Davis Road. The RE zone is intended to provide for residential development on large lots and provide a transition between agricultural and residentially-designated lands.
The proposed project is a TPM to divide the existing ±5-acre parcel into four new parcels, each 1.25 acres in size (see Attachments 1 and 2: Tentative Parcel Map 5247 and Civil Improvement Plans). Per the Applicant’s Statement of Justification, three of the new parcels are planned to be sold as future single-family residential development sites – the Applicant plans to construct a personal residence on the remainder fourth parcel. On May 1, 2025, the Planning Commission approved the requested TPM No. 5247. As part of the Planning Commission’s action, standard Conditions of Approval were recommended to ensure compliance with Municipal Code Title 16 and the General Plan. The Planning Commission’s recommended Conditions of Approval are included in Attachment 3.
On May 12, 2025, the City Clerk received a filing of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s action from the Applicant. Specifically, the applicant is appealing Conditions of Approval #7 and #15 related to frontage improvements and utility undergrounding.
On June 4, 2025, the City Clerk received a request from the Applicant to postpone the appeal hearing to allow time for further discussions with city staff. On July 8, 2025, the City Clerk received a subsequent request from the Applicant to reschedule the appeal hearing to the next available meeting.
ANALYSIS
Municipal Code Title 16 establishes the requirements for all property subdivisions in the City of West Sacramento. To ensure that subdivision projects comply with the established Title 16 requirements, staff prepare standard Conditions of Approval that are consistent across all Parcel Maps and Subdivision Maps considered by the Planning Commission. One of the standard conditions for property subdivisions is a requirement for 235
TPM No. 5247 Appeal
8/20/2025
frontage improvements as established in Municipal Code § 16.44.040 (Improvements Required). This requirement obligates the Applicant to improve the linear property frontage on exiting public streets and roadways to City standard including, but not limited to: street structural section, curbs, sidewalks, driveway approaches, and transitions. Currently, the linear property frontage on Seymour Avenue and Davis Road at the project site are substandard and do not conform to the established City standard for Rural Roads due to the lack of a roadside shoulder. The City has established roadway standards to ensure that public streets and roads are adequate for anticipated traffic levels and meet minimum safety standards for police and fire access. In order to conform to the established City standard for Seymour Avenue and Davis Road, the Applicant is required to construct minimal asphalt widening, compaction of a six-foot-wide gravel shoulder, and excavation of new roadside drainage ditches. The full scope of the required frontage improvements, with diagrams, can be found in the Civil Improvement Plans (Attachment 2) on sheet C3A.
Similarly, Municipal Code § 16.44.040(G) requires undergrounding of existing overhead utilities for all new subdivision projects. Utility undergrounding is a key component of both the General Plan, Southport Framework Plan, and Climate Action Plan particularly because overhead utilities lose power more frequently and for longer durations of time during extreme weather events. Downed utility poles present significant fire, traffic circulation, and public safety risks that can be mitigated by undergrounding utility lines. Utility undergrounding serves to advance the city’s climate action and climate resilience agendas in creating a more safe and stable power distribution network to homes and businesses throughout the city. Requiring utility undergrounding as part of the property subdivision process ensures that gradual progress is made towards a full underground network with each new development project in the city. Foregoing utility undergrounding as a requirement for private subdivision projects would serve to delay progress towards a full underground network and shift the burden of future utility undergrounding to the city.
Appeal Letters
In the Applicant’s appeal letters (see Attachments 4 and 5), several claims are outlined as the basis for the removal of Conditions of Approval #7 and #15. Conditions of Approval #7 and #15 are provided below.
Condition #7
“Project frontage on Seymour Avenue and Davis Road shall be improved to meet City Rural Road Standards.
Improvements shall be limited to half street improvements including widening necessary to provide a 12-footwide travel lane, a 6-foot-wide gravel shoulder and a roadside drainage ditch. Said roadside ditch shall match capacity and cross-section of the existing roadside ditch. Timing of said public improvements may be deferred as follows:
Parcel 1 frontage on Seymour Avenue and Davis Road shall be improved concurrently with the development of Parcel 1.
Parcel 2 frontage on Davis Road shall be improved concurrently with the development of Parcel 2. Parcel 3 frontage on Seymour Avenue shall be improved concurrently with the development of Parcel 3 or Parcel 4, whichever comes first.
Should a Building Permit be issued within the boundary of this Tentative Map prior to this Tentative Map being approved by the Planning Commission, the frontage improvement obligations, as outlined above, shall be improved for the effected Parcel concurrent with the Parcel Map.” Condition #15
“Unless otherwise waived by the Planning Commission, any existing overhead utility lines located within the subdivision boundary or along it’s frontage with a public road shall be placed underground. All proposed new utilities shall be placed underground. Timing of undergrounding may occur as outlined for the frontage improvements above, in Condition #7.”
The Applicant’s claims along with staff’s analysis and responses are provided below.
1. The appeal letters claim that the project not a subdivision, the project is being incorrectly reviewed under standards for a large development project or “full subdivision”, the project should be reviewed under different standards for a single-family homeowner building a personal residence.
The requirements for dividing land (i.e. subdivisions) are applied uniformly to all subdivision projects within the city – regardless of the number of new parcels being created. The requirements for frontage improvements and utility undergrounding contained in Municipal Code § 16.44.040 apply uniformly to both Parcel Maps (four or 236
TPM No. 5247 Appeal
8/20/2025
fewer parcels) and Subdivision Maps (five or more parcels). The project does, in fact, meet the definition of a subdivision as defined in Municipal Code § 16.08.300 and Government Code § 66424. Neither the State Subdivision Map Act nor the City’s Municipal Code provide different standards or exceptions for property owners constructing personal residences.
2. The appeal letters claim the Applicant was told during a meeting with City staff that the four overhead utility poles could remain.
On April 2, 2025, staff held a meeting with the Applicant and his surveyor to review the scope of the required frontage improvements, including roadway widening. During the meeting it was determined that an error in the Applicant’s plans showed the utility pole at the intersection of Davis Road and Seymour Avenue to be within the travelled roadway after the required road widening was constructed. Staff directed the Applicant and his surveyor to correct the error which would result in the removal of roadway conflicts with the utility pole. Staff communicated to the Applicant that although it was feasible for the roadway widening to occur without any conflicts with the utility poles, leaving the poles and overhead utilities in place would still require a waiver from the Planning Commission.
3. The appeal letters claim that similar projects located at 3521 Otis Ave. and 3075 Gabri Court were not required to underground overhead utilities.
The project located at 3521 Otis Ave. is a 4-lot subdivision approved by the Planning Commission in 2021. As a Condition of Approval, the project is required to underground the existing overhead utilities along the project frontage from Marshall Road to Otis Avenue.
The project located at 3075 Gabri Court (Capital Estates) was not subject to the utility undergrounding requirement along the Harmon Road frontage because the project had been subdivided in 1913 (Jefferson Subdivision Map), predating the City’s incorporation and undergrounding requirements as identified in Municipal Code § 16.44.040. If the Capital Estates project required a Tentative Map prior to development and construction, the Harmon Road frontage would be included in the utility undergrounding requirement as stated in Municipal Code § 16.44.040(G). It is important to note that all utilities within Capital Estates – along Gabri and Beltrami Courts - were undergrounded during the initial phase of residential development.
4. The appeal letters claim that the cost of undergrounding the overhead utilities is between $400,000 and $650,000.
The Applicant’s appeal letters present a range of informal cost estimates for the required utility undergrounding.
These figures are not based on PG&E’s formal design and estimating process. The actual cost of undergrounding overhead utilities can vary widely depending on numerous site-specific factors, including:
Location and capacity of existing transformers and electrical panels. Quantity and configuration of service laterals.
Required modifications to PG&E’s distribution network. Necessary coordination with other utility providers for joint-trench installation.
City staff cannot verify the validity of the Applicant’s stated range without a formal project initiation with PG&E, which is the only means by which a definitive design and construction estimate can be prepared. This formal process involves field evaluation, engineering design, and cost estimating by PG&E, and ensures that the scope of work, construction approach, and budget are based on actual system needs and regulatory requirements.
In conclusion, the Applicant’s cost range is speculative. In situations where a subdivision of this magnitude and significant street frontage is proposed, the City’s subdivision utility undergrounding requirement is applied consistently, and cost determinations must be based on PG&E’s formal design process, not informal or thirdparty estimates.
5. The appeal letters claim that four new utility poles would be installed as a result of the utility undergrounding, including some on neighbors' properties.
The ultimate location and number of new utility poles, if any, will be determined by PG&E during the design process. While it is likely that poles will be necessary to connect the undergrounded segment to the existing overhead network at the project boundaries, the final placement will be:
237
TPM No. 5247 Appeal
8/20/2025
Within existing public utility easements (PUEs) or within public rights-of-way. Designed to maintain clearance and access per PG&E and California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) standards.
Coordinated to minimize impacts to adjoining properties.
PG&E’s standard practice is to avoid installation of new poles outside existing easements unless additional rights are obtained. If poles are required across Davis Road or Seymour Avenue, these would be located within public right-of-way and not on private property without proper easement rights.
The appellant’s assertion that new poles will be placed on neighboring private property is premature and not supported without PG&E’s completed design. Final locations will conform to existing utility easements and rightof-way regulations.
6. The appeal letters claim that PG&E does not recommend trenching for underground utilities within existing ditches.
The location of joint trenches for underground utilities will be finalized during PG&E’s design process in coordination with the City. While there may be constraints associated with trenching in existing drainage ditches—such as potential impacts to flow, maintenance access, and structural stability—PG&E routinely designs alternative alignments to avoid conflicts or mitigate impacts.
During construction, both City and PG&E inspectors will verify that:
Trenching and backfill meet applicable utility, drainage, and safety standards. Installation conforms to the approved engineered plans. Existing infrastructure and drainage functions are preserved or restored.
The existence of a ditch does not preclude undergrounding; it requires coordination and potentially modified alignment. The design process will determine the final trench location consistent with PG&E, City, and drainage requirements.
7. The appeal letters claim that the required utility undergrounding and frontage improvements serve no purpose because almost all development on Davis Road and Seymour Avenue is complete.
The improvement requirements outlined in Municipal Code § 16.44.040 apply to all subdivision projects to ensure that public streets, roadways, and utilities are safe, reliable, and adequate for the increased population and land use intensity resulting from new development. These requirements also support the City’s long-term policy of incremental infrastructure completion, whereby each development contributes its proportional share of improvements toward a connected and functional transportation and utility network.
Although some development along Davis Road and Seymour Avenue is complete, there remain multiple vacant Rural Estate (RE)-zoned parcels ranging from approximately 2.5 to 10 acres in the immediate area. As these parcels develop over time, each will be required to contribute improvements to their respective frontages, resulting in a consistent and upgraded roadway and utility corridor. The project’s improvements are a critical part of this incremental buildout strategy and are necessary to maintain equitable infrastructure investment across developments.
8. The appeal letters claim that the frontage improvements would sink over time due to the necessary filling and compaction required within existing roadside ditches.
As part of the project application a Geotechnical Engineering Report was provided which contains professional recommendations for the design of future building foundations and roadway pavement structural sections. If the frontage improvements are constructed consistent with the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Engineering Report, the risk of future roadway structural failure or subsidence is low. Prior to approving a final inspection of the frontage improvements, city inspectors will ensure that the construction has been completed in accordance with the established Rural Road Standard Specifications and Details.
9. The appeal letters claim that the frontage improvements will result in higher speeds and unsafe pedestrian conditions on Seymour Avenue and Davis Road. 238
TPM No. 5247 Appeal
8/20/2025
The required frontage improvements include minimal asphalt widening and installation of a six-foot-wide gravel shoulder along the project frontage on Seymour Avenue and Davis Road. As such, the frontage improvements would provide wider asphalt sections along a minimal portion of the roadways and would not provide roadway widening significant enough to impact vehicle speeds. No changes to posted speed limits are proposed as part of the roadway widening. As previously mentioned, improving the roadways to City standards ensures that the roads are adequate to accommodate traffic levels and emergency access.
The required frontage improvements would serve to enhance pedestrian safety on these sections of Seymour Avenue and Davis Road by providing 6-foot shoulder areas outside the travel lanes. Currently, pedestrians are forced to walk along narrow or non-existent shoulders with little separation from vehicle traffic. The six-foot gravel shoulders will create additional lateral separation and safer pedestrian passage.
10. The appeal letters claim that fire and safety vehicles have been successfully navigating Seymour Avenue and Davis Road for decades and the frontage improvements are not necessary for fire and safety access.
While emergency response has historically been possible, the existing segments of Davis Road and Seymour Avenue adjacent to the project site do not meet the 20-foot minimum paved width required under the California Fire Code. This minimum is critical for:
Allowing two fire engines to pass each other during fire-ground operations. Enabling firefighters to operate alongside their apparatus while leaving sufficient clearance for additional emergency vehicles.
The City’s Fire Marshal has reviewed the site and confirmed that the required frontage improvements will bring these road sections into compliance by providing:
20 feet of asphalt roadway width, and
6-foot gravel shoulders for additional emergency maneuvering and staging space.
These improvements are essential to meet modern fire safety standards and ensure efficient, safe emergency response for the subdivision and surrounding neighborhood.
Environmental Considerations
On January 17, 2024, the City Council certified the General Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR). The SEIR was prepared specifically to allow maximum streamlined review of subsequent projects that are found to be consistent with the General Plan in terms of land use, density, location, etc. – as per § 15183 of CEQA. Staff prepared a Technical Memorandum (see Attachment 4) in order to fully analyze any potential impacts associated with the project. Based on the analysis presented in the technical memorandum, the proposed project is within the scope of the certified EIR and SEIR prepared for the General Plan, and no new or substantially more adverse impacts would occur through implementation of the proposed project. As a result, no new environmental document is required, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, 15162, and 15168(c)(2).
The applicant has completed an application consistent with the requirements of the Yolo Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and Municipal Code Title 20. The Yolo HCP was developed to provide for the conservation of twelve sensitive species and to provide a streamlined permitting process to address the effects of future development activities on those species. As part of the Yolo HCP application process, the Applicant is required to have a qualified biologist conduct a Planning Level Survey to determine the presence of, or potential habitat for covered species. The Planning Level Survey identified four (4) covered species that have the potential to occur on or near the project. The survey detected the presence of one (1) of these covered species at the site. Avoidance and Minimization Measures (AMMs) were identified to mitigate the project’s impacts to sensitive communities and potentially occupied covered species habitat – the AMMs are further detailed in the HCP application. The project’s mitigation fee will be due at grading permit issuance.
Commission Recommendation
On May 1, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and approved the TPM, subject to the Conditions of Approval.
239
TPM No. 5247 Appeal
8/20/2025
Strategic Plan Integration
This project advances the 2024 Strategic Priorities “Climate & Energy Resilience” and “Mobility & Connectivity” by contributing to a fully underground utility network and providing roadway improvements to meet adopted City standards.
Alternatives
The City Council’s primary alternatives to the recommended action are summarized below.
1. Find that the Conditions of Approval are not adequate and provide specific alternative conditions.
2. Find that the recommended CEQA determination is not the appropriate level of environmental review and direct staff to perform additional environmental analysis (specify impacts to be addressed) prior to Planning Commission consideration of the request.
3. Continue the item to a future date and request that additional information (specified by the Council) be provided at that time.
While staff believes the analysis presented in this report is thorough, correct, and adequately addresses the Applicant’s concerns, staff is prepared to effectuate the alternatives at the Council’s direction.
Coordination and Review
The Tentative Parcel Map and recommended Conditions of Approval were reviewed by the Community Development Department, Public Works Department, and Fire Departments.
Budget/Cost Impact
No Impact.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Tentative Parcel Map No.5247
2. Civil Improvement Plans
3. Resolution 25-5PC
a. Conditions of Approval
4. Appeal Letter Received 5/12/2025
5. Appeal Letter Received 7/19/2025
6. Technical Memorandum
7. Resolution 25-67
240
ALLAN AVE
PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT (RR228)(RED) PROPOSED EDGE OF SHOULDER (RR228)(LIME) PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT (RR228)(RED) PROPOSED EDGE OF SHOULDER (RR228)(LIME) FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8"
REBAR APN 045-212-012 PARCEL B 96-0000178-00 O.R.
20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
2 B.M. 74 SEYMOUR AVENUE
20' REAR SETBACK LINE
PER CITY CODE (TYP)
EAST 412.56' 263.96' 263.96'
S 89°59'29" W 412.53' (S 89°59'57" W 412.56')
S 00°00'18" W 527.92' (S 00°00'39" E) 263.96' 263.96'
206.28'
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
APN 045-212-003
N 00°00'07" E 527.98' (N 00°00'39" W 527.93')
206.28'
6.2 6.2
6.0 5.8
6.0 6.0
5.8 5.8 5.5
12.5' PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT
11 P.M. 40-41
CL
EX. ±18' DITCH
CL
EX. ±10' DITCH ±16' TRAVELED WAY - ASPHALT
50' SEPARATION LEACH FIELD
CL
FROM EXISTING DITCH
CL EDGE OF PAVEMENT
PARCEL 3
1.25 ACRES (GROSS)
1.098 ACRES (NET)
PARCEL 4
1.25 ACRES (GROSS AND NET)
PARCEL A
96-0000178-00 O.R.
BLACK WILLOW, CUMULATIVE DBH 65.1",
(HERITAGE TREE), DLR=21', TAG 323
8" BLACK WALNUT, DLR=14'
10.8" VALLEY OAK, DLR=20', TAG 324
SIBERIAN ELM, CUMULATIVE DBH 31.8"
(HERITAGE TREE), DLR=16', TAG 322
5.2" BLACK WALNUT,
DLR=8'
DAVIS ROAD
(PUBLIC ROAD - 40' WIDE) 20' 20'
EXISTING POLE TO
REMAIN IN PLACE
EXISTING UTILITY
POLE TO REMAIN
EXISTING UTILITY
POLE TO REMAIN
EXISTING UTILITY
POLE TO REMAIN
GLADYS AVE
206.28'
(E) WELL PUMP IN
SHED CLOSEST SEWER CONNECTION IS
±1270' NORTHEAST ON ALLAN AVENUE
AT THE INTERSECTION WITH
MARSHALL DRIVE 20' SIDE SETBACK LINE PER CITY CODE (TYP) SIBERIAN ELM, CUMULATIVE DBH 27.9", DLR=22', TAG 330
SIBERIAN ELM, CUMULATIVE DBH 17.4", DLR=20', TAG 329
30' FRONT SETBACK LINE
PER CITY CODE (TYP)
10.2" BLACK WALNUT, DLR=9'
SIBERIAN ELM, CUMULATIVE DBH 18.9", DLR=15'
PROPOSED 5' STREET DEDICATION
122'
±16' TRAVELED WAY - ASPHALT
135'
206.28'
PARCEL 1
1.25 ACRES (GROSS)
1.078 ACRES (NET)
PARCEL 2
1.25 ACRES (GROSS)
1.226 ACRES (NET)
127.5'
193' PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE
BENEFIT OF PARCEL 4 AND EMERGENCY
ACCESS EASEMENT
100' (TYP)
25' ROAD, UTILITIES, DRAINAGE, RAILROAD, LEVEES,
STREET, ROADWAY, AND SHRUB AND FLOWER
PLANTING EASEMENT
2 B.M. 74
15,000 S.F. MUWDA
LEACH FIELD
(E) WELL
(P) WELL
(P) WELL
(P) WELL
(P) WELL
15,000 S.F. MUWDA
LEACH FIELD
15,000 S.F. MUWDA
LEACH FIELD
15,000 S.F. MUWDA
LEACH FIELD
APN 045-212-013
CHERRY PLUM, CUMULATIVE DBH 34.6",
DLR= 12', (HERITAGE TREE)
LEACH
AREA
LEACH
AREA
BUILDABLE AREA
BUILDABLE AREA
BUILDABLE AREA
BUILDABLE AREA
APN 045-170-027 APN 045-182-008
APN 045-182-009 10' 10' 10' 10'
10'
10'
10'
10'
10'
10'
50'
50' 10' 10'
10' 30'
APN 045-170-025
50' RIGHT OF WAY
2 B.M. 74
CLOSEST NEIGHBORING
WELL 122' AWAY
R=25'EP 10' SIDE SETBACK LINE PER CITY CODE (TYP)
LEGEND:
DLR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Drip Line Radius
OHW OHW Overhead Wires
Property Line
Right of Way Line
RR228 - - - - - - - - - - - - - Rural Road Section
Standard Detail #228
Easement Line
Building Setback Line
0 20 40 80 120
SCALE IN FEET
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5247
OF
PARCEL A, 96-0000178-00 O.R.
(PORTION PARCEL 1, 11 PM 40-41)
BEING A VACANT LOT
AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DAVIS ROAD & SEYMOUR AVENUE
YOLO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED FOR
JOHNNY ZAPARA
BY
UNDER THE SUN SERVICES
3086 SUSAN CT., WEST SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
SCALE 1"-40' (916) 716-3565
MARCH 2025
OWNER:
Johnny Zapara
3775 Industrial Blvd. #981472
West Sacramento, CA 95798
SUBDIVIDER:
Johnny Zapara
3775 Industrial Blvd. #981472
West Sacramento, CA 95798
LAND SURVEYOR:
Amy Morrow LS 9236
Under the Sun Services
3086 Susan Ct.
West Sacramento, CA 95691
(916) 716-3565
[email protected]
CIVIL ENGINEER:
Larry Andrews RCE 47013
CSI Engineering
2795 East Bidwell St. #100-346
Folsom, CA 95630
(707) 372-6634
[email protected]
LAND USE:
Existing is 1 parcel. Proposed is 4 parcels.
AREA: 217,805 sq.ft. (5.00 acres gross)
204,605 sq.ft. (4.697 acres net)
ZONING: RE (Residential Rural Estates)
APN: 045-212-013-000
SEWER: Septic
WATER: Well
POWER: Pacific Gas & Electric
FIRE DISTRICT: City of West Sacramento
FLOOD ZONE: 'X' Per FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map
Community-Panel Number 0607280010B, effective January
19, 1995
CONTOUR INTERVAL: 0.02' and 1.0'. City of West
Sacramento GPS Static Survey, 13 M&S 61-69, NGVD 1929,
Station Name F24-02 SEYMOUR AVE
ALLAN AVE
JEFFERSON BLVD
ACREAGE TABLE:
GROSS NET
PARCEL 1 1.25 AC 1.078 AC
PARCEL 2 1.25 AC 1.226 AC
PARCEL 3 1.25 AC 1.098 AC
PARCEL 4 1.25 AC 1.250 AC
TOTAL 5.00 AC 4.652 AC
DAVIS RD
NOTES:
1. The proposed project is a 5-acre vacant lot. The new parcels will be 1.25 acres each, 2 facing Davis Road and 2 facing south to an access road under the guidelines of Clustered Housing Development.
2. Parcel 4 will be granted a 20' wide access easement with the recording of this map. An Emergency Vehicle Access Easement will be created as shown with the recording of this map. No trees need to be removed.
3. This plat depicts conditions as they existed in March 2021.
4. Applicant plans to sell the new parcels individually as vacant. All new development will be the responsibility of the buyer. Building location, well, septic and dispersal field options are identified on the accompanying Civil Plans prepared by CSI Engineering, dated January 27, 2025, which are an attachment to this plat. Sheet 3CA of Civil Plans has been revised, dated March 01, 2025.
5. There are no neighboring wells within 100' of the project. See Civil Plans revised Sheet C3A (dated January 16, 2025) for existing (E) and proposed (P) well detail. Known neighboring septic dispersal fields are shown hereon. No additional septic fields were observed near the westerly right of way of Seymour Avenue, the northerly right of way of Davis Road, or within 500' south. Septic areas for APNs 045-170-027, 045-170-025 and 045-182-008 are north of the homes a substantial distance and are not within 100' of (P) wells.
6. All building setbacks will be in conformance with the development standards for RE zoning per West Sacramento municipal code.
7. Any applicable habitat conservation/mitigation fees per Yolo Habitat Conservation Report prepared March 14, 2023, would be due at the building permit stage, prior to grading. *SITE*
241
NO SCALE
SL
85 6"W
T
6"G
SSMH
SDMH
DATE APPROVED:
MARK COLLIER, CITY ENGINEER, RCE 54031
PROJECT SITE
95691
WEST SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
1110 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE
DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
SD
BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHY ARE BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED
BY UNDER THE SUN SURVEYS, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA
DATED MARCH, 2021
CATCH BASIN
CATCH BASIN
WATER VALVE
WITH GUY
POWER POLE
SIGN
SIGN
1" WATER SERVICE & CHECK VALVE
WELL TYPE MONUMENT
BLOWOFF ASSEMBLY
WATER VALVE
70W HPSV STREET LIGHT
CONCRETE
SEWER MANHOLE
CURB & GUTTER
FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY
CLEANOUT
DROP INLET
WM
BO
SSCO
HP GAS LINE
TELEPHONE
WATER LINE
EXISTING CONTOUR
TOP/TOE BANK
CURB AND GUTTER
SANITARY SEWER
STORM DRAIN
MANHOLE
MANHOLE
CENTERLINE
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTRACTOR TO
INSTALL STANDARD
PROPOSED
D
FH WV
WV
SSMH
CATCH BASIN
EROSION CONTROL FILTER
NEW STORM DRAIN
ALLEN RD
PAGES 61-69 (BENCHMARK: F24-02, EL 7.18 NGVD 1929) DISC IN WELL, CL DAVIS RD X CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO GPS STATIC SURVEY, FILED AS 13 MAPS & SURVEYS, AT
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
TC - TOP OF CURB
TW - TOP OF WALL
S/W - SIDEWALK
TYP - TYPICAL
STD - STANDARD
SD - STORM DRAIN
S - SLOPE, SOUTH
UE- UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL
FL - FLOWLINE
DWY - DRIVEWAY
DI - DRAIN INLET
CONC. - CONCRETE
MIN - MINIMUM
CL - CENTER LINE / CLASS
AC - ASPHALT CONCRETE
ARV - AIR RELEASE VALVE
AB - AGGREGATE BASE
INV - INVERT
FOC - FACE OF CURB
FH - FIRE HYDRANT
FG - FINISH GRADE
MAX - MAXIMUM
L - LENGTH
GB - GRADE BREAK
W - WATER MAIN
UG- UNDERGROUND GAS
UT-UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
EP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT
FF - FINISH FLOOR
EL - ELEVATION
EXIST/EX - EXISTING
PL - PROPERTY LINE
IE - INVERT ELEVATION
HP - HIGH POINT
PP - POWER POLE
P - PAD ELEVATION
SS - SANITARY SEWER
R - RADIUS
RIM - RIM ELEVATION
WS - WATER SERVICE
PVMT - PAVEMENT
TB - TOP OF BANK
CU - COPPER
GR - GRATE ELEVATION
TF - TOP OF FOOTING
DIP - DUCTILE IRON PIPE
PVC - POLYVINYLCHLORIDE
TCD - THROUGH CURB DRAIN
B/W - BACK OF WALK
NAPOTS - NOT A PART OF THIS SUBDIVISION
LP - LOW POINT
WM - WATER METER / MAIN
ABBREVIATIONS
BASIS OF BEARINGS
DATUM
CENTERLINE SEYMOUR RD, DETERMINED BY FOUND MONUMENTS PER 12RS60
SYMBOL LEGEND
VICINITY MAP
BF - BLIND FLANGE
COVER SHEET
C1
1 SITE PLAN
N
S
W E
YOLO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
ALSO BEING PARCEL A, 96-0000178-00 O.R.
BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 1, 11 P.M. 40-41
(916) 373-5840
CITY AGENCIES
PG&E
PG&E
REPRESENTATIVES
(916) 775-1743
PHONE NO.
(916) 371-1483
(916) 223-0123
BRYAN JONSON
U.S.A.:
FIRE DEPARTMENT:
CABLE:
ELECTRIC:
GAS:
PRIVATE UTILITY
ENGINEERING DIVISION: MARK COLLIER (916) 617-4645
PLANNING DIVISION: DAVID TILLEY (916) 617-4645
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 900
811
(916) 760-2966
BLAKE JOHNSON
EMILY PEARSON
EMILY PEARSON
COMMUNICATIONS FRANK BARGIEL
WAVE FRANK BARGIEL
(916) 760-2956
DAVIS RD
SCALE: 1" = 100'
C6 PARCEL 1 CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER PLAN
C5 PARCEL 1 CONCEPTUAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C4 PARCEL 1 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
C3A OVERALL SITE PLAN
C3 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
C2 GENERAL NOTES
C1 COVER SHEET
C15 PARCEL 4 CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER PLAN
C14 PARCEL 4 CONCEPTUAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C13 PARCEL 4 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
C12 PARCEL 3 CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER PLAN
C11 PARCEL 3 CONCEPTUAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C10 PARCEL 3 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
C9 PARCEL 2 CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER PLAN
C8 PARCEL 2 CONCEPTUAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C7 PARCEL 2 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVES
SHEET INDEX
As Noted
CONCEPTUAL CIVIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR
N
S
W E
SURVEY NOTE
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5247
3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA
1 2
3 4
DAVIS ROAD
SEYMOUR AVENUE
95691
WEST SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
1110 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE
FIRE DEPARTMENT
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
DATE APPROVED:
BRYAN JONSON, FIR MARSHAL
SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA FOUND 5/8" REBAR
EAST 412.56'
206.28'
263.96' 263.96'
263.96' 263.96'
206.28'
OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW
OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW
206.28'
6.2 6.2
6.0 5.8
6.0 6.0
5.8 5.8
5.5 C
L CL
CL CL
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
PARCEL A
96-0000178-00 O.R.
APN 045-212-013
SIBERIAN ELM, CUMULATIVE DBH 18.9", DLR=15'
10.2" BLACK WALNUT, DLR=9'
CHERRY PLUM, CUMULATIVE DBH 34.6",
DLR= 12', (HERITAGE TREE)
20'
206.28'
242
GENERAL NOTES
C2
2 None
CIVIL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 243
SCALE: 1" = 40'
0 40' 80'
C3
1" = 40'
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
3 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SCALE: 1" 40'
DAVIS RD @ SEYMOUR AVE
SOUTHWEST AERIAL VIEW
NORTHWEST AERIAL VIEW
EAST LOOKING AERIAL VIEW
N
S
W E
S
W
N
E
VIEW @ ENTRANCE TO LOT 1
N
S
W E
N
S
W E
263.96'
SEE SHEETS C4, C5 & C6
SEE SHEETS C7, C8 & C9
SEE SHEETS C10, C11 & C12 SEE SHEETS C13, C14 & C15
PARCEL 4
PARCEL 3
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
SUBJECT PARCEL
SUBJECT PARCEL
SUBJECT PARCEL
CENTER LINE
(E) EDGE OF PAVEMENT
(E) EDGE OF PAVEMENT
CENTER LINE
DAVIS RD
20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
2 B.M. 74
PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT
FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 4 AND
EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT
SEYMOUR AVENUE
SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA OHW
OHW
OHW
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
APN 045-212-012
PARCEL B
96-0000178-00 O.R.
EAST 412.56'
206.28'
263.96' 263.96'
263.96' 263.96'
206.28'
OHW OHW OHW OHW
OHW OHW OHW
OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW
206.28'
6.2 6.2
6.0 5.8
6.0 6.0
5.8 5.8
C
L CL
CL CL
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
PARCEL A
96-0000178-00 O.R.
APN 045-212-013
SIBERIAN ELM, CUMULATIVE DBH 18.9", DLR=15'
10.2" BLACK WALNUT, DLR=9'
CHERRY PLUM, CUMULATIVE DBH 34.6",
DLR= 12', (HERITAGE TREE)
20'
206.28'
244
SCALE: 1" = 40'
0 40' 80'
C3A
1" = 40'
OVERALL SITE PLAN
4 OVERALL SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 40'
N
S
W E
STRUCTURES AND IMPERVIOUS SURFACES
13,500 SQ. FT. WHICH SHALL INCLUDE ALL
FUTURE BUILDABLE AREA, NOT TO EXCEED
CL
(TYP) 24' WIDE PAVED SECTION
R/W
2%
N.T.S.
R/W
2:1 MAX
' 1' MIN
12 '
50 '
7 ' 6 ' 12 ' 6 ' 7 '
BASE
TREATED
LIME
15"
5" CL 2 AB
ROADSIDE DITCH 3.5" TYPE B AC
DITCH
ROADSIDE
4" AB SHOULDER (TYP)
1 C3A
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
'
SOUTH NORTH
REMAIN
ONSITE TO
ALL TREES
(P) WELL
DAVIS ROAD
SEYMOUR AVENUE
78.4 '
74.6 '
119.4 '
20 '
30 '
20 '
30 '
108.6 '
54.2 '
48.8 '
103.8 '
20 '
20 '
20 '
30 20
'
'
4,388.50 SF
3,497.95 SF
87.8 '
1 2
4 3
R/W
50 '
25 '
R/W
(COLOR RED)
WIDTH VARIES
AC PAVEMENT WIDENING
(COLOR YELLOW)
PER DET 1/C3A
NEW 6' AB SHOULDER
(COLOR GREEN)
NEW 7' ROADSIDE DITCH
(COLOR RED)
WIDTH VARIES
AC PAVEMENT WIDENING
(COLOR YELLOW)
PER DET 1/C3A
NEW 6' AB SHOULDER
(COLOR GREEN)
PER DET 1/C3A
NEW 7' ROADSIDE DITCH
(E) POLE (E) POLE
(E) POLE
NEW 55 LF x 24" SD CULVERT
' 30
R
(P) WELL
10 '
10 '
10 '
10 '
10 '
108 '
(E) WELL
March 1, 2025
125.8'
(E) WELL
(E) POLE
(E) WELL PUMP IN
SHED
CLOSEST NEIGHBORING
WELL 122' AWAY
(P) WELL
(E) WELL
135'
122'
AREA
LEACH
AREA
LEACH
79.4'
(P) WELL
LEACHFIELD
15,000S.F.MUWDA
LEACHFIELD
15,000S.F. MUWDA
LEACHFIELD
15,000S.F.MUWDA
LEACHFIELD
15,000S.F. MUWDA 10 '
10 '
10 '
10 '
10 '
R = 28.00'
SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA FOUND 5/8" REBAR
EAST 412.56'
206.28'
263.96' 263.96'
263.96' 263.96'
206.28'
OHW OHW OHW OHW
OHW OHW OHW
OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW
206.28'
6.2 6.2
6.0 5.8
6.0 6.0
5.8 5.8
5.5 C
L CL
CL CL
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
PARCEL A
96-0000178-00 O.R.
APN 045-212-013
SIBERIAN ELM, CUMULATIVE DBH 18.9", DLR=15'
10.2" BLACK WALNUT, DLR=9'
CHERRY PLUM, CUMULATIVE DBH 34.6",
DLR= 12', (HERITAGE TREE)
20'
206.28'
245
N
S
W E
5 SCALE: 1" = 20'
0 20' 40'
2 C4
DRIVEWAY CULVERT
N.T.S.
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
DETAIL PROVIDED BY
C4
PARCEL 1 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
1" = 20'
EP6.89
FL5.57
GB7.01GB7.16
TOE5.70
EP6.82
FL5.32
GB7.20
EP7.09
EP6.85
CL7.79
FL4.10
1 C4
1 C4
2+00
3 4
5 2
1 6
0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80
FIN GRD
ELEVATION (FT)
CHANNEL
(E) DRAINAGE
0+00
DAVIS ROAD
SEYMOUR AVENUE
1 C4
SECTION
SCALE: 1" = 20' (HORIZ)
1" = 5' (VERT)
0 7
8 S = 0.0005
S = 0.0005
0+00 PROPERTY LINE
0+25.00 ROAD EASEMENT
0+37.50 UTILITY EASEMENT
FL5.51
SEYMOUR AVE
2+06.28 PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED HOME
20' DRIVEWAY PER 2/C4
PROPERTY LINE
OVERLAND RELEASE
' 40
S=1.0%
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
S = 0.5%
PER DET 3/C3
VEGETATED SWALE
2:1
3.0'
MIN
2:1
ORFLATTER
0.75'
MIN
3 C4
VEGETATED SWALE
N.T.S.
PER DET 3/C4
VEGETATED SWALE
VEG SWALE (TYP)
SPOUTS TO
CONNECT DOWN
NEW HOME SITE
POTENTIAL
3 4
5 2
1 6
0 7
8 ELEVATION (FT)
FF = 7.90
PAD = 6.90
EARTH WORK QUANTITIES
FILL:
CUT:
EXPORT:
IMPORT:
NOTE: EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE
APPROXIMATE. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY TO INDEPENDENTLY ESTIMATE
SHRINKAGE OR SWELL.
INCLUDE ROAD PAVEMENT, UTILITY SPOILS,
QUANTITIES FOR HIS/HER OWN USE. DOES NOT
5 CY
148 CY
5 CY
148 CY
1 PER DET 4/C4
NEW 7' ROADSIDE DITCH
PER DET 4/C4
AC PAVEMENT WIDENING
PER DET 4/C4
NEW 6' AB SHOULDER
NEW 55 LF x 24" SD CULVERT
RELOCATE (E) POLE
RELOCATE (E) SIGN
PER DET 4/C4
AC PAVEMENT WIDENING
PER DET 4/C4
NEW 6' AB SHOULDER
PER DET 4/C4
NEW 7' ROADSIDE DITCH
CL
R/W
2%
R/W
2:1 MAX
' 1' MIN
12 '
50 '
7 ' 6 ' 12 ' 6 ' 7 '
BASE
TREATED
LIME
15"
5" CL 2 AB
ROADSIDE DITCH 3.5" TYPE B AC
DITCH
ROADSIDE
4" AB SHOULDER (TYP)
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
'
(TYP) 24' WIDE PAVED SECTION
N.T.S.
4 C4
RELOCATE (E) POLE
SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA EAST 412.56'
263.96'
OHW OHW OHW
OHW OHW OHW
5.8 C
L
CL
SIBERIAN ELM, CUMULATIVE DBH 18.9", DLR=15'
10.2" BLACK WALNUT, DLR=9'
CHERRY PLUM, CUMULATIVE DBH 34.6",
DLR= 12', (HERITAGE TREE)
20'
206.28'
246
6 STREET
WAY AT EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
ENTRANCE AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF
BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION
PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION
50'
GROUND
PLAN
AS THE WORK PROGRESSES.
ALSO, STREETS SHALL BE CLEANED DAILY.
BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY.
1. 5.
4. 3.
2. EROSION CONTROL NOTES
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN HEREON, WHICH INTERFERE WITH
THE WORK SHALL BE RELOCATED OR MODIFIED WHEN THE INSPECTOR SO DIRECTS
ALL LOOSE SOIL AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE STREET UPON STARTING OPERATIONS AND PERIODICALLY THEREAFTER AS DIRECTED BY THE INSPECTOR.
AFTER SEWER AND UTILITY TRENCHES ARE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED, THE
SURFACES OVER SUCH TRENCHES SHALL BE MOUNDED SLIGHTLY TO PREVENT CHANNELING OF WATER IN THE TRENCH AREA. CARE SHOULD BE EXERCISED
TO PROVIDE FOR CROSS-FLOW AT FREQUENT INTERVALS WHERE TRENCHES ARE
EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE INSPECTOR, ALL DEVICES SHOWN SHALL ALL DEBRIS AND SILT SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS AFTER STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM ALL YEAR.
ON A DAILY BASIS.
SITE BEFORE BEGINNING THAT OPERATION.
CHARGES RESULTING FROM DUST NUISANCE. DUST CONTROL WILL BE PERFORMED
10. 11.
9. 8.
7. 6. CHANGES TO THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN TO MEET FIELD CONDITIONS
WILL BE MADE ONLY WITH APPROVAL OF OR AT THE DIRECTION OF THE AGENT ALL PAVED AREAS WILL BE KEPT CLEAR OF EARTH MATERIAL AND DEBRIS. THE SITE
WILL BE MAINTAINED SO THAT SEDIMENT LADEN RUNOFF DOES NOT ENTER THE
AS STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS ARE CONSTRUCTED, ALL STRUCTURES AND INLET
PIPES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM INFLOW OR SILT BY SILT BAGS AND SAND BAGS
CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS TO PROVIDE EROSION
CONTROL MEASURE MADE NECESSARY BY A CONSTRUCTION OPERATION ON THE JOB ADJACENT PROPERTIES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM STORM WATERS, MUD, SILT, ETC.
DUST CONTROL SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL FINAL COMPLETION. THE CONTRACTOR, WHEN HE OR HIS SUBCONTRACTOR ARE
OPERATING EQUIPMENT ON-SITE, SHALL PREVENT THE FORMATION OF ANY AIRBORNE
NUISANCE BY WATERING AND OR TREATING THE SITE OF THE WORK IN SUCH A MANNER THAT WILL CONFINE DUST PARTICLES TO THE IMMEDIATE SURFACE OF THE WORK.
THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY DUST FROM
HIS OWN ACTIVITIES OR HIS SUBCONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES IN PERFORMING THE WORK
UNDER HIS CONTRACT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CITATIONS, FINES, OR EACH STORM IN ALL BASINS.
FOR THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY.
PER DETAILS.
NOT ON THE CENTERLINE OR A CROWNED STREET.
ON A DAILY BASIS.
1" = 40'
PARCEL 1 CONCEPTUAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 40'
0 40' 80'
C5
1 C5
2 WORK AREA
DRAINAGE DIRECTION
C5
STABILIZED ENTRANCE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 40'
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
DAVIS RD
8" MIN.
50'
APPROVED EQUAL)
(MIRAFI 600X OR
FILTER FABRIC
(7" MAX.)
AGGREGATE OR LARGER
1" TO 3" DIA. COARSE
10'
ROADWAY
HARD SURFACE
NOT TO SCALE
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
W/ EPA STDS.
3. COMPOST SHALL NOT CONTAIN BIOSOLIDS & SHALL BE CONSISTENT
2. BAGS SHALL BE OVERLAPPED BY 2' MIN
1. MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF SILT FENCE FOR RUNOFF CONTROL FILTER SOCKS:
NOTES FOR COMPOST FILLED
OF RUNOFF
DIRECTION
PAVED CONDITION UNPAVED CONDITION
LIMITS OF GRADING LIMITS OF GRADING
12"COMPOST FILTER SOCK
SPACE PER MF'R SPECIFICATIONS
IN GROUND
3/4"X 3/4"X 16"MIN STAKE
OF RUNOFF
DIRECTION
10"COMPOST FILTER SOCK
EXIST PAVT
LEGEND
NOT TO SCALE
PER DET 2/C5
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
PER DET 1/C5
STABILIZED ENTRANCE
STORAGE, PORTABLE TOILET & STOCK PILE AREA
CONCRETE WASHOUT, STAGING,
N
S
W E
SEYMOUR AVE
OVERLAP
6" MIN
FILTER SOCK
FILTER SOCK
TYP SOCK OVERLAP DETAIL
SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA EAST 412.56'
263.96'
OHW OHW OHW
OHW OHW OHW
5.8 C
L
CL
PARCEL A
96-0000178-00 O.R.
APN 045-212-013
SIBERIAN ELM, CUMULATIVE DBH 18.9", DLR=15'
10.2" BLACK WALNUT, DLR=9'
CHERRY PLUM, CUMULATIVE DBH 34.6",
DLR= 12', (HERITAGE TREE)
20'
206.28'
247
N
S
W E
PARCEL 1 CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER PLAN
C6
1" = 20'
7 SCALE: 1" = 20'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
0 20' 40'
DAVIS RD
STORMWATER PLAN
DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA "A" (HATCHED)
DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA "B" (HATCHED)
MITIGTION MEASURE: PERMEABLE PAVERS
TREATMENT METHODS: VEGETATED SWALE
DRAINS TO DAVIS RD ROADSIDE DITCH
DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA "A" 39,367 SQ FT
DRAINS TO RD 900 IRRIGATION CHANNEL
DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA "B" - 15,083 SQ FT
TOTAL AREA 54,449.67 SQ FT
1 C6
VEGETATED SWALE
2:1
3.0'
NO SCALE
MIN
2:1
ORFLATTER
0.75'
MIN
VEGETATED SWALE PER DET 1/C6
SEYMOUR AVE.
LEGEND
EAST 412.56'
1 PER DET 1/C6
VEGETATED SWALE
S = 0.5%
SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA EAST 412.56'
263.96'
OHW OHW OHW
OHW OHW OHW
5.8 C
L
CL
SIBERIAN ELM, CUMULATIVE DBH 18.9", DLR=15'
10.2" BLACK WALNUT, DLR=9'
CHERRY PLUM, CUMULATIVE DBH 34.6",
DLR= 12', (HERITAGE TREE)
20'
206.28'
248
N
S
W E
8 SCALE: 1" = 20'
0 20' 40'
2 C7
DRIVEWAY CULVERT
N.T.S.
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
DETAIL PROVIDED BY
C7
PARCEL 2 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
1" = 20'
GB7.17
AC7.87
FL4.72
1 C7
1 C7
3+80
3 4
5 2
1 6
2+00 2+20 2+40 2+60 2+80 3+00 3+20 3+40 3+60
FIN GRD
ELEVATION (FT)
DAVIS ROAD
1 C7
SECTION
SCALE: 1" = 20' (HORIZ)
1" = 5' (VERT)
0 7
8 S = 0.0005
2+06.28 PROPERTY LINE
FL4.73
4+12.56 PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED HOME
20' DRIVEWAY PER 2/7
BLDG SETBACK LINE
PROPERTY LINE
OVERLAND RELEASE
' 40
S=1.0%
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
S = 0.5%
PER DET 3/C7
VEGETATED SWALE
2:1
3.0'
MIN
2:1
ORFLATTER
0.75'
MIN
3 C7
VEGETATED SWALE
N.T.S.
VEGETATED SWALE
VEG SWALE (TYP)
SPOUTS TO
CONNECT DOWN
NEW HOME SITE
POTENTIAL
S = 0.0005
GB6.74
EP7.28
346
GB6.95
S=1.0%
CL7.95
DITCH
EX ROADSIDE
PAD = 7.50
3 4
5 2
1 6
ELEVATION (FT)
0 7
8 9
10 9
10 VEGETATED SWALE
4+00 4+20
GRADING PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'
EARTH WORK QUANTITIES
FILL:
CUT:
EXPORT:
IMPORT:
NOTE: EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE
APPROXIMATE. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY TO INDEPENDENTLY ESTIMATE
SHRINKAGE OR SWELL.
INCLUDE ROAD PAVEMENT, UTILITY SPOILS,
QUANTITIES FOR HIS/HER OWN USE. DOES NOT
5 CY
211 CY
5 CY
211 CY
FF = 8.50
2 FL5.38
PER DET 4/C7
NEW 6' AB SHOULDER
PER DET 4/C7
AC PAVEMENT WIDENING
PER DET 4/C7
NEW 7' ROADSIDE DITCH
CL
R/W
2%
R/W
2:1 MAX
' 1' MIN
12 '
50 '
7 ' 6 ' 12 ' 6 ' 7 '
BASE
TREATED
LIME
15"
5" CL 2 AB
ROADSIDE DITCH 3.5" TYPE B AC
DITCH
ROADSIDE
4" AB SHOULDER (TYP)
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
'
(TYP) 24' WIDE PAVED SECTION
N.T.S.
4 C7
SOUTH NORTH
SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA EAST 412.56'
206.28'
OHW OHW OHW OHW
6.2 6.0
5.8 CL
96-0000178-00 O.R.
APN 045-212-013
249
9 STREET
WAY AT EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
ENTRANCE AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF
BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION
PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION
50'
GROUND
PLAN
AS THE WORK PROGRESSES.
ALSO, STREETS SHALL BE CLEANED DAILY.
BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY.
1. 5.
4. 3.
2. EROSION CONTROL NOTES
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN HEREON, WHICH INTERFERE WITH
THE WORK SHALL BE RELOCATED OR MODIFIED WHEN THE INSPECTOR SO DIRECTS
ALL LOOSE SOIL AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE STREET UPON STARTING OPERATIONS AND PERIODICALLY THEREAFTER AS DIRECTED BY THE INSPECTOR.
AFTER SEWER AND UTILITY TRENCHES ARE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED, THE
SURFACES OVER SUCH TRENCHES SHALL BE MOUNDED SLIGHTLY TO PREVENT CHANNELING OF WATER IN THE TRENCH AREA. CARE SHOULD BE EXERCISED
TO PROVIDE FOR CROSS-FLOW AT FREQUENT INTERVALS WHERE TRENCHES ARE
EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE INSPECTOR, ALL DEVICES SHOWN SHALL ALL DEBRIS AND SILT SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS AFTER STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM ALL YEAR.
ON A DAILY BASIS.
SITE BEFORE BEGINNING THAT OPERATION.
CHARGES RESULTING FROM DUST NUISANCE. DUST CONTROL WILL BE PERFORMED
10. 11.
9. 8.
7. 6. CHANGES TO THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN TO MEET FIELD CONDITIONS
WILL BE MADE ONLY WITH APPROVAL OF OR AT THE DIRECTION OF THE AGENT ALL PAVED AREAS WILL BE KEPT CLEAR OF EARTH MATERIAL AND DEBRIS. THE SITE
WILL BE MAINTAINED SO THAT SEDIMENT LADEN RUNOFF DOES NOT ENTER THE
AS STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS ARE CONSTRUCTED, ALL STRUCTURES AND INLET
PIPES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM INFLOW OR SILT BY SILT BAGS AND SAND BAGS
CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS TO PROVIDE EROSION
CONTROL MEASURE MADE NECESSARY BY A CONSTRUCTION OPERATION ON THE JOB ADJACENT PROPERTIES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM STORM WATERS, MUD, SILT, ETC.
DUST CONTROL SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL FINAL COMPLETION. THE CONTRACTOR, WHEN HE OR HIS SUBCONTRACTOR ARE
OPERATING EQUIPMENT ON-SITE, SHALL PREVENT THE FORMATION OF ANY AIRBORNE
NUISANCE BY WATERING AND OR TREATING THE SITE OF THE WORK IN SUCH A MANNER THAT WILL CONFINE DUST PARTICLES TO THE IMMEDIATE SURFACE OF THE WORK.
THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY DUST FROM
HIS OWN ACTIVITIES OR HIS SUBCONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES IN PERFORMING THE WORK
UNDER HIS CONTRACT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CITATIONS, FINES, OR EACH STORM IN ALL BASINS.
FOR THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY.
PER DETAILS.
NOT ON THE CENTERLINE OR A CROWNED STREET.
ON A DAILY BASIS.
1" = 40'
PARCEL 2 CONCEPTUAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 40'
0 40' 80'
C8
1 C8
2 WORK AREA
DRAINAGE DIRECTION
C8
STABILIZED ENTRANCE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 40'
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
DAVIS RD
8" MIN.
50'
APPROVED EQUAL)
(MIRAFI 600X OR
FILTER FABRIC
(7" MAX.)
AGGREGATE OR LARGER
1" TO 3" DIA. COARSE
10'
ROADWAY
HARD SURFACE
NOT TO SCALE
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
W/ EPA STDS.
3. COMPOST SHALL NOT CONTAIN BIOSOLIDS & SHALL BE CONSISTENT
2. BAGS SHALL BE OVERLAPPED BY 2' MIN
1. MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF SILT FENCE FOR RUNOFF CONTROL FILTER SOCKS:
NOTES FOR COMPOST FILLED
OF RUNOFF
DIRECTION
PAVED CONDITION UNPAVED CONDITION
LIMITS OF GRADING LIMITS OF GRADING
12"COMPOST FILTER SOCK
SPACE PER MF'R SPECIFICATIONS
IN GROUND
3/4"X 3/4"X 16"MIN STAKE
OF RUNOFF
DIRECTION
10"COMPOST FILTER SOCK
EXIST PAVT
OVERLAP
6" MIN
FILTER SOCK
FILTER SOCK
TYP SOCK OVERLAP DETAIL
LEGEND
NOT TO SCALE
PER DET 2/C8
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
PER DET 1/C8
STABILIZED ENTRANCE
STORAGE, PORTABLE TOILET & STOCK PILE AREA
CONCRETE WASHOUT, STAGING,
N
S
W E
SEYMOUR AVE
EAST 412.56'
SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA EAST 412.56'
206.28'
263.96'
OHW OHW OHW OHW
6.2 6.0
5.8 CL
250
PARCEL 2 CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER PLAN
C9
1" = 20'
10 SCALE: 1" = 20'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
0 20' 40'
DAVIS RD
STORMWATER PLAN
DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA "A" (HATCHED)
MITIGTION MEASURE: PERMEABLE PAVERS
TREATMENT METHODS: VEGETATED SWALE
DRAINS TO DAVIS RD ROADSIDE DITCH
DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA "A" 54,449.67 SQ FT
TOTAL AREA 54,449.67 SQ FT
1 C9
VEGETATED SWALE
2:1
3.0'
NO SCALE
MIN
2:1
ORFLATTER
0.75'
MIN
LEGEND
VEGETATED SWALE PER DET 1/C9
N
S
W E
SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA FOUND 5/8" REBAR
206.28'
263.96'
OHW OHW OHW
OHW
6.2 6.0
5.8 CL
251
N
S
W E
11 SCALE: 1" = 20'
0 20' 40'
C10
PARCEL 3 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
1" = 20'
9"CULVERT
FL4.42
FL3.65
EP6.75
GB7.36
EP6.72
GB7.01
GB7.16
1 C10
1 C10
2+00
3 4
5 2
1 6
0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80
ELEVATION (FT)
CHANNEL
RD 900 IRRIGATION
0+00
SEYMOUR AVENUE
1 SECTION
SCALE: 1" = 20' (HORIZ)
1" = 5' (VERT)
0 7
8 S=0.5%
0+00 PROPERTY LINE
0+25.00 ROAD EASEMENT
0+37.50 UTILITY EASEMENT
FL5.57
SEYMOUR AVE
2+26.28 PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED HOME
BLDG SETBACK LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
S = 0.5%
S = 0.5%
PER DET 4/C10
VEGETATED SWALE
2:1
3.0'
MIN
2:1
ORFLATTER
0.75'
MIN
4 VEGETATED SWALE
VEG SWALE (TYP)
SPOUTS TO
CONNECT DOWN
NEW HOME SITE
POTENTIAL
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
GB6.49
TOE5.49
TOE5.71
2:1 MAX SLOPE
(TYP)
#4 @ 18" EW
6" ROCKS
MIN
#4 BARS @ 18" EW
STEEL REINFORCEMENT,
CULVERT WALL SECTION
6" ROCK LAYER
' 4'
' 48'
6 '
9'
' 18'
38'
' 38'
MIN
4/C-23
CONC PER DET
NOT TO SCALE
FINISH GRADE
DETAIL
EROSION PROTECTION
STORM CULVERT
PIPE PER PLAN
APRON
CONCRETE
18" x 12"
PIPE PER PLAN
MIN
MIN
RCP CULVERT
DRIVEWAY
PROTECTION
SLOPE
CONC.
REBAR
@ 12x12
CAP W/ #4
CONCRETE
6" MIN
(E) FL
INV3.60
INV3.73
PRESERVE (E) TREES
(8" COMPACTED CL 2 AB W/GRAVEL OR 3" AC)
20' ALL-WEATHER ACCESS RD
5 2
3 INV4.21
INV4.08
S = 0.5%
26 LF 15" CULVERT PER DET 1/C10
5 '
HEAD WALLS PER DETAILS THIS SHT EA END
C10 C10
C10
C10
C10
OVERLAND RELEASE
GB6.49
GB5.74
FL3.10
FL3.65
(E) FL
EARTH WORK QUANTITIES
FILL:
CUT:
EXPORT:
IMPORT:
NOTE: EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE
APPROXIMATE. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY TO INDEPENDENTLY ESTIMATE
SHRINKAGE OR SWELL.
INCLUDE ROAD PAVEMENT, UTILITY SPOILS,
QUANTITIES FOR HIS/HER OWN USE. DOES NOT
4.5 CY
187 CY
4.5 CY
111 CY
GRADING PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'
(E) CULVERT
VEGETATED SWALE
FF 7.50
PAD 6.50
S = 0.5%
26 LF 24" CULVERT PER DET 1/C7
20' DRIVEWAY
NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE
3 4
5 2
1 6
ELEVATION (FT)
0 7
2+20 2+40
3 FL4.75
RELOCATE (E) POLE
PER DET 1/C3A
NEW 6' AB SHOULDER
PER DET 1/C3A
NEW 7' ROADSIDE DITCH
PER DET 1/C3A
AC PAVEMENT WIDENING
SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 263.96'
206.28'
OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW
5.8 5.5
CL
PARCEL A
96-0000178-00 O.R.
252
12 STREET
WAY AT EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
ENTRANCE AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF
BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION
PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION
50'
GROUND
PLAN
AS THE WORK PROGRESSES.
ALSO, STREETS SHALL BE CLEANED DAILY.
BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY.
1. 5.
4. 3.
2. EROSION CONTROL NOTES
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN HEREON, WHICH INTERFERE WITH
THE WORK SHALL BE RELOCATED OR MODIFIED WHEN THE INSPECTOR SO DIRECTS
ALL LOOSE SOIL AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE STREET UPON STARTING OPERATIONS AND PERIODICALLY THEREAFTER AS DIRECTED BY THE INSPECTOR.
AFTER SEWER AND UTILITY TRENCHES ARE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED, THE
SURFACES OVER SUCH TRENCHES SHALL BE MOUNDED SLIGHTLY TO PREVENT CHANNELING OF WATER IN THE TRENCH AREA. CARE SHOULD BE EXERCISED
TO PROVIDE FOR CROSS-FLOW AT FREQUENT INTERVALS WHERE TRENCHES ARE
EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE INSPECTOR, ALL DEVICES SHOWN SHALL ALL DEBRIS AND SILT SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS AFTER STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM ALL YEAR.
ON A DAILY BASIS.
SITE BEFORE BEGINNING THAT OPERATION.
CHARGES RESULTING FROM DUST NUISANCE. DUST CONTROL WILL BE PERFORMED
10. 11.
9. 8.
7. 6. CHANGES TO THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN TO MEET FIELD CONDITIONS
WILL BE MADE ONLY WITH APPROVAL OF OR AT THE DIRECTION OF THE AGENT ALL PAVED AREAS WILL BE KEPT CLEAR OF EARTH MATERIAL AND DEBRIS. THE SITE
WILL BE MAINTAINED SO THAT SEDIMENT LADEN RUNOFF DOES NOT ENTER THE
AS STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS ARE CONSTRUCTED, ALL STRUCTURES AND INLET
PIPES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM INFLOW OR SILT BY SILT BAGS AND SAND BAGS
CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS TO PROVIDE EROSION
CONTROL MEASURE MADE NECESSARY BY A CONSTRUCTION OPERATION ON THE JOB ADJACENT PROPERTIES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM STORM WATERS, MUD, SILT, ETC.
DUST CONTROL SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL FINAL COMPLETION. THE CONTRACTOR, WHEN HE OR HIS SUBCONTRACTOR ARE
OPERATING EQUIPMENT ON-SITE, SHALL PREVENT THE FORMATION OF ANY AIRBORNE
NUISANCE BY WATERING AND OR TREATING THE SITE OF THE WORK IN SUCH A MANNER THAT WILL CONFINE DUST PARTICLES TO THE IMMEDIATE SURFACE OF THE WORK.
THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY DUST FROM
HIS OWN ACTIVITIES OR HIS SUBCONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES IN PERFORMING THE WORK
UNDER HIS CONTRACT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CITATIONS, FINES, OR EACH STORM IN ALL BASINS.
FOR THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY.
PER DETAILS.
NOT ON THE CENTERLINE OR A CROWNED STREET.
ON A DAILY BASIS.
1" = 40'
PARCEL 3 CONCEPTUAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 40'
0 40' 80'
C11
1 C11
2 WORK AREA
DRAINAGE DIRECTION
C11
STABILIZED ENTRANCE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
DAVIS RD
8" MIN.
50'
APPROVED EQUAL)
(MIRAFI 600X OR
FILTER FABRIC
(7" MAX.)
AGGREGATE OR LARGER
1" TO 3" DIA. COARSE
10'
ROADWAY
HARD SURFACE
NOT TO SCALE
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
W/ EPA STDS.
3. COMPOST SHALL NOT CONTAIN BIOSOLIDS & SHALL BE CONSISTENT
2. BAGS SHALL BE OVERLAPPED BY 2' MIN
1. MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF SILT FENCE FOR RUNOFF CONTROL FILTER SOCKS:
NOTES FOR COMPOST FILLED
OF RUNOFF
DIRECTION
PAVED CONDITION UNPAVED CONDITION
LIMITS OF GRADING LIMITS OF GRADING
12"COMPOST FILTER SOCK
SPACE PER MF'R SPECIFICATIONS
IN GROUND
3/4"X 3/4"X 16"MIN STAKE
OF RUNOFF
DIRECTION
10"COMPOST FILTER SOCK
EXIST PAVT
OVERLAP
6" MIN
FILTER SOCK
FILTER SOCK
TYP SOCK OVERLAP DETAIL
LEGEND
NOT TO SCALE
PER DET 1/C11
STABILIZED ENTRANCE
STORAGE, PORTABLE TOILET & STOCK PILE AREA
CONCRETE WASHOUT, STAGING,
N
S
W E
SEYMOUR AVE
PER DET 2/C11
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
3 SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 263.96'
206.28'
OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW
6.0 5.8
5.5 CL
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
PARCEL A
96-0000178-00 O.R.
APN 045-212-013
253
N
S
W E
PARCEL 3 CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER PLAN
C12
1" = 20'
13 SCALE: 1" = 20'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
0 20' 40'
STORMWATER PLAN
DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA "A" (HATCHED)
DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA "B" (HATCHED)
MITIGTION MEASURE: PERMEABLE PAVERS
TREATMENT METHODS: VEGETATED SWALE
DRAINS TO DAVIS RD ROADSIDE DITCH
DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA "A" 35,526 SQ FT
DRAINS TO EXIST CHANNELS
DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA "B" - 18,924 SQ FT
TOTAL AREA 54,449.67 SQ FT
1 C12
VEGETATED SWALE
2:1
3.0'
NO SCALE
MIN
2:1
ORFLATTER
0.75'
MIN
SEYMOUR AVE.
LEGEND
5 '
VEGETATED SWALE PER DET 1/C12
3 SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 206.28'
OHW OHW OHW OHW
5.8 5.5
CL
254
N
S
W E
14 ADJUST SCALE ACCORDINGLY.
BAR IS NOT EXACTLY TWO (2) INCHES,
IF PHYSICAL DISTANCE ACROSS SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 20'
0 20' 40'
C13
PARCEL 4 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
1" = 20'
FL3.09
EG 6.04
1 C13
1 C13
S = 0.5%
BLDG SETBACK LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
S = 0.5%
S = 0.5%
PER DET 2/C13
VEGETATED SWALE
2:1
3.0'
MIN
2:1
ORFLATTER
0.75'
MIN
2 VEGETATED SWALE
N.T.S.
VEG SWALE (TYP)
SPOUTS TO
CONNECT DOWN
S = 0.5%
C13
OVERLAND RELEASE
' 20
20 '
152.6 '
FIRE TRUCK TURN-AROUND AREA
OR 3" AC)
ALL-WEATHER (8" CL 2 AB W/ GRAVEL
EG 6.12
EG 6.09
EG 5.71
GB5.49
FL2.89
FL
MAX HT 2'0"
CONC RETAINING WALL
' 70
3+80
3 4
5 2
1 6
2+00 2+20 2+40 2+60 2+80 3+00 3+20 3+40 3+60
FIN GRD
ELEVATION (FT)
1 C13
SECTION
SCALE: 1" = 20' (HORIZ)
1" = 5' (VERT)
0 7
8 2+06.28 PROPERTY LINE
4+12.56 PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED HOME
3 4
5 2
1 6
ELEVATION (FT)
0 7
8 9
10 9
10 VEGETATED SWALE
4+00 4+20
EARTH WORK QUANTITIES
FILL:
CUT:
EXPORT:
IMPORT:
NOTE: EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE
APPROXIMATE. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY TO INDEPENDENTLY ESTIMATE
SHRINKAGE OR SWELL.
INCLUDE ROAD PAVEMENT, UTILITY SPOILS,
QUANTITIES FOR HIS/HER OWN USE. DOES NOT
5 CY
192 CY
5 CY
192 CY
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
GRADING PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'
' 20
DRAINAGEEASEMENT
DRIVEWAY
NEW HOME SITE
POTENTIAL
PAD 7.50
FF 8.50
4 SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 206.28'
6.0 6.0
255
15 STREET
WAY AT EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
ENTRANCE AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF
BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION
PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION
50'
GROUND
PLAN
AS THE WORK PROGRESSES.
ALSO, STREETS SHALL BE CLEANED DAILY.
BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY.
1. 5.
4. 3.
2. EROSION CONTROL NOTES
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN HEREON, WHICH INTERFERE WITH
THE WORK SHALL BE RELOCATED OR MODIFIED WHEN THE INSPECTOR SO DIRECTS
ALL LOOSE SOIL AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE STREET UPON STARTING OPERATIONS AND PERIODICALLY THEREAFTER AS DIRECTED BY THE INSPECTOR.
AFTER SEWER AND UTILITY TRENCHES ARE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED, THE
SURFACES OVER SUCH TRENCHES SHALL BE MOUNDED SLIGHTLY TO PREVENT CHANNELING OF WATER IN THE TRENCH AREA. CARE SHOULD BE EXERCISED
TO PROVIDE FOR CROSS-FLOW AT FREQUENT INTERVALS WHERE TRENCHES ARE
EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE INSPECTOR, ALL DEVICES SHOWN SHALL ALL DEBRIS AND SILT SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS AFTER STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM ALL YEAR.
ON A DAILY BASIS.
SITE BEFORE BEGINNING THAT OPERATION.
CHARGES RESULTING FROM DUST NUISANCE. DUST CONTROL WILL BE PERFORMED
10. 11.
9. 8.
7. 6. CHANGES TO THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN TO MEET FIELD CONDITIONS
WILL BE MADE ONLY WITH APPROVAL OF OR AT THE DIRECTION OF THE AGENT ALL PAVED AREAS WILL BE KEPT CLEAR OF EARTH MATERIAL AND DEBRIS. THE SITE
WILL BE MAINTAINED SO THAT SEDIMENT LADEN RUNOFF DOES NOT ENTER THE
AS STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS ARE CONSTRUCTED, ALL STRUCTURES AND INLET
PIPES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM INFLOW OR SILT BY SILT BAGS AND SAND BAGS
CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS TO PROVIDE EROSION
CONTROL MEASURE MADE NECESSARY BY A CONSTRUCTION OPERATION ON THE JOB ADJACENT PROPERTIES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM STORM WATERS, MUD, SILT, ETC.
DUST CONTROL SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL FINAL COMPLETION. THE CONTRACTOR, WHEN HE OR HIS SUBCONTRACTOR ARE
OPERATING EQUIPMENT ON-SITE, SHALL PREVENT THE FORMATION OF ANY AIRBORNE
NUISANCE BY WATERING AND OR TREATING THE SITE OF THE WORK IN SUCH A MANNER THAT WILL CONFINE DUST PARTICLES TO THE IMMEDIATE SURFACE OF THE WORK.
THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY DUST FROM
HIS OWN ACTIVITIES OR HIS SUBCONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES IN PERFORMING THE WORK
UNDER HIS CONTRACT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CITATIONS, FINES, OR EACH STORM IN ALL BASINS.
FOR THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY.
PER DETAILS.
NOT ON THE CENTERLINE OR A CROWNED STREET.
ON A DAILY BASIS.
1" = 40'
PARCEL 4 CONCEPTUAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 40'
0 40' 80'
C14
1 C14
2 WORK AREA
DRAINAGE DIRECTION
C14
STABILIZED ENTRANCE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 40'
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
8" MIN.
50'
APPROVED EQUAL)
(MIRAFI 600X OR
FILTER FABRIC
(7" MAX.)
AGGREGATE OR LARGER
1" TO 3" DIA. COARSE
10'
ROADWAY
HARD SURFACE
NOT TO SCALE
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
W/ EPA STDS.
3. COMPOST SHALL NOT CONTAIN BIOSOLIDS & SHALL BE CONSISTENT
2. BAGS SHALL BE OVERLAPPED BY 2' MIN
1. MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF SILT FENCE FOR RUNOFF CONTROL FILTER SOCKS:
NOTES FOR COMPOST FILLED
OF RUNOFF
DIRECTION
PAVED CONDITION UNPAVED CONDITION
LIMITS OF GRADING LIMITS OF GRADING
12"COMPOST FILTER SOCK
SPACE PER MF'R SPECIFICATIONS
IN GROUND
3/4"X 3/4"X 16"MIN STAKE
OF RUNOFF
DIRECTION
10"COMPOST FILTER SOCK
EXIST PAVT
OVERLAP
6" MIN
FILTER SOCK
FILTER SOCK
TYP SOCK OVERLAP DETAIL
LEGEND
NOT TO SCALE
PER DET 2/C14
COMPOST FILTER SOCK
PER DET 1/C14
STABILIZED ENTRANCE
& STOCK PILE AREA
STORAGE, PORTABLE TOILET
CONCRETE WASHOUT, STAGING,
N
S
W E
20'
PROPERTY LINE
VEGETATED SWALE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
4 SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 263.96'
206.28'
6.0 6.0
256
PARCEL 4 CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER PLAN
C15
1" = 20'
16 SCALE: 1" = 20'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
0 20' 40'
STORMWATER PLAN
DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA "A" (HATCHED)
TREATMENT METHODS: VEGETATED SWALE
DRAINS TO EXISTING DRAINAGE SWALE
DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA "A" 54,449.67 SQ FT
TOTAL AREA 54,449.67 SQ FT
1 C15
VEGETATED SWALE
2:1
3.0'
NO SCALE
MIN
2:1
ORFLATTER
0.75'
MIN
LEGEND
20'
PROPERTY LINE
S = 0.5%
PER DET 1/C15
VEGETATED SWALE
DRAINAGEEASEMENT
N
S
W E
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
SHEET
File:
Scale:
Proj. Engr:
Checked:
Drawn:
Designed:
Date:
BY DATE REVISIONS
LA
LA
LA
LA
CWS DATE
RUAL
E
No. 47013
REENI
GNE
L NA
ROFESSIO
P DERETSI
GER
CALIFORN IA
F
O ETATS
CIVIL
Exp.
12/31/25 SWERND A
NCE
23-29
(707) 372-6634
Folsom, CA 95630
2795 East Bidwell St #100-346
CSI Engineering
OF 16 SHEETS
APN 045-212-013
Plans Prepared By:
January 27, 2025
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5247, 3055 DAVIS ROAD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 263.96'
206.28'
6.0 6.0
257
RESOLUTION 25-5PC
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WEST
SACRAMENTO
APPROVING A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AT 3071 DAVIS ROAD
WHEREAS, on March 23, 2023 the Department of Community Development, Planning Division received an application from Johnny Zapara for real property located at 3071 Davis Road requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel Map and Planned Development Permit; and WHEREAS, on May 1, 2025 the West Sacramento Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the requested Tentative Parcel Map and Planned Development Permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found the proposed map is consistent with the applicable general and specific plans as specified in the Government Code Section 65451; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the applicable general and specific plans; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the site is physically suitable for the type of development; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the design of the tentative map or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan, including the density and intensity limitations that apply; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the land use being proposed; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that adequate transportation facilities and public services exist or will be provided in accord with the conditions of development plan approval, to serve the proposed development; and the approval of the proposed development will not result in a reduction of traffic levels of service or public services so as to be a detriment to public health, safety, or welfare; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the proposed development will not have a substantial adverse effect on surrounding land uses and will be compatible with the existing and planned land use character of the surrounding area; and Docusign Envelope ID: D1B64F56-E5F8-4D9E-977C-0CE6F476BEB1 258
Resolution 25-5PC