Agenda packet — Wildomar City Council, October 11, 2023 (part 2 of 5)

23873 Clinton Keith Rd., Suite 201
Wildomar, CA 92595
951-677-7751
www.CityofWildomar.org
TO:

You are directed to make the following changes from the plans and specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this contract. NOTE: This change order is not effective until approved by the engineer.

Description of work to be done, estimate of quantities, and prices to be paid. (Segregate between additional work at contract price, agreed price, and force account.) Unless otherwise stated, rates for rental of equipment cover only such time as equipment is actually used and no allowance will be made for idle time. The last percentage shown is the net accumulated increase or decrease from the original quantity in the Bid Item List. 463

CITY OF WILDOMAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

CHANGE ORDER
Change Requested by: City Contractor
CHANGE ORDER NO. CAPITAL PROJECT NO. FEDERAL PROJECT NO. PROJECT NAME NOTE: A copy of the fully executed CCO shall be placed in the project file.

REV 08/2019

Page 2 of 3 ends

23873 Clinton Keith Rd., Suite 201
Wildomar, CA 92595
951-677-7751
www.CityofWildomar.org

CHANGE ORDER JUSTIFICATION/REASON

CHANGE ORDER PAYMENT METHOD

BID ITEM PRICE(S) AGREED UNIT PRICE(S) AGREED LUMP SUM FORCE ACCOUNT If agreed unit price(s) or lump sum, supporting docs establishing prices are on file. YES N/A Was there an adjustment in the unit bid price (adjustment in compensation)? YES NO If there was a unit bid price adjustment, is there a force account analysis on file? YES N/A Note: If Force Account used, daily reports shall include sufficient detail for the work.

CHANGE ORDER TIME ADJUSTMENT
Does this Contract Change Order provide a Contract Time Adjustment? YES NO If yes, the time of completion will be adjusted as follows:

If there is a Contract Time Adjustment, is there a Time Impact Analysis on file? YES N/A

CHANGE ORDER DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Does this Contract Change Order revise existing or propose new engineering drawings and/or specifications? YES NO
If yes, are the drawings and/or specifications stamped by a professional engineer? YES N/A

PROJECT COST TRACKING
Change Order Estimated Cost: Increase Decrease Total:

ORIGINAL BID AMOUNT $

TOTAL OF PRIOR CHANGE ORDERS

THIS CHANGE ORDER

UPDATED PROJECT TOTAL COST
464

CITY OF WILDOMAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

CHANGE ORDER
Change Requested by: City Contractor
CHANGE ORDER NO. CAPITAL PROJECT NO. FEDERAL PROJECT NO. PROJECT NAME NOTE: A copy of the fully executed CCO shall be placed in the project file.

REV 08/2019

Page 3 of 3 ends

23873 Clinton Keith Rd., Suite 201
Wildomar, CA 92595
951-677-7751
www.CityofWildomar.org

SUBMITTED BY

SIGNATURE NAME AND TITLE DATE

APPROVAL RECOMMENDED BY

SIGNATURE NAME AND TITLE DATE

ENGINEER APPROVAL BY

SIGNATURE NAME AND TITLE DATE
We, the undersigned contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and agree to provide equipment, furnish materials, and perform the work specified above, and will accept as full payment the prices shown above. NOTE: If you do not sign this order, you are directed to proceed with the ordered work.

You may file a Request for Information within the time specified.

CONTRACTOR ACCEPTANCE BY

SIGNATURE NAME AND TITLE DATE
465
Description QTY
Delete Bid Item #21 - Apply Type II Microsuracing -76,198.00 Add to Bid Item #6 - Switch Microsurfacing Streets to 1.5" Cold Mill 76,198.00 Add to Bid Item #12 - Switch Microsurfacing Steets to AC Overlay 76,198.00 Bid Item #12 - ARHM Add 151,677.00
Bid Item #13 - ARHM Add 48,941.00
Bid Item #B6 - ARHM Add 104,916.00
$70,901.24
SF $0.05 $5,245.80

REJECTED
Please add 0 Working Day to the Contract for this Work Grand Total 1 SF $0.56 ($42,670.88)
2 SF $0.24 $18,287.52
3 SF $1.05 $80,007.90
4 SF $0.05 $7,583.85
5 SF $0.05 $2,447.05
6 Attn: Cameron Luna
Project: Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation & Slurry Seal Project, CIP 057-2, CIP 058-2 RE: Delete Microsurfacing and Switch to 1.5" Grind & Overlay - Switch all Conventional AC Items to ARHM Public Works Estimator / Project Manager
Gordon Kline

RECEIVED BY, TRANSMITTED BY,
No Total Price Unit Price

COMMENTS

APPROVED AS NOTED

APPROVED REVISE & RESUBMIT

CHANGE ORDER REQUEST
To: City of Wildomar
23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suit e110
Wildomar, CA 92595
Transmittal Date: 08/22/23
COR No:

AAA Job No:
003
35436
466
467
468
469
470
471

CITY OF WILDOMAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DETAIL SHEET
FY 23/24 to FY 27/28
PROJECT TITLE: CIP NO.: DEPT: Public Works
LOCATION: CATEGORY: MANAGER: Cameron Luna
INITIATED: FY 18/19
FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 &
Future Years
Project Dev/Environ. $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Design/PS&E 250,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Right-of-Way - - - - - -
Construction 7,700,000 3,700,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Const Admin/Inspect. 675,000 275,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total Cost: 8,625,000 $ 4,025,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 1,150,000

FUNDING SOURCES
$ 691,046 $ 91,046 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 6,058,954 2,058,954 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 $ 1,850,000 1,850,000 - - - -
$ 84,000 84,000 - - - -
201 - Measure A
500 - RMRA (SB1)
120 - Measure AA
507 - Calrecycle
505 - MSRC $ 25,000 25,000 - - - -

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND EXHIBIT
Annual Pavement Rehabilitation Program:

This program provides for the rehabilitation of selected streets based on the City Pavement Management Report, Maintenance Records, and Citizen Input.

PROJECT

PHASE/TASK
TOTAL 5-
YEAR

PROJECT

PROPOSED BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET

PROJECT SUMMARY
Pavement Rehabilitation Program 057-2 internal
Citywide Trans. (Maint.)

PRE-REHAB
WILDOMAR TRAIL REHAB (CIP 057 - SUMMER 2020)

POST-REHAB

Page 29 of 68 ends

August 22, 2023
City of Wildomar
23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 110
Wildomar, CA 92595
Attn: Cameron Luna
Project: Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation & Slurry Seal Project CIP 057-2, CIP 058-2 RE: Contract Bid Item Calculation Error
Dear Mr. Luna,
All American Asphalt has encountered a calculation error for Bid Item #19 Type II PME-RAP Slurry Seal and Bid Item #21 Apply Type II Microsurfacing. When closing out our bid we inadvertently applied the crack seal dollar amount of $1,523.96 to Bid Item #19 and the crack seal dollar amount of $182,367.10 to Bid Item #21. These two dollar amounts should have been switched. The crack seal dollar amount of $182,367.10 should have been applied to Bid Item #19 and the crack seal dollar amount of $1,523.96 should have been applied to Bid Item #21. This would result in a proper unit price of $457.00 per Ton for Bid Item #19 and a proper unit price of $0.56 per SF for Bid Item #21. We are asking the City of Wildomar to forgive our math error and accept our unit price of $457.00 per Ton for Bid Item #19 Type II PME-RAP Slurry Seal and our unit price of $0.56 per SF for Bid Item #21 Apply Type II Microsurfacing.

These revised unit prices are competitive and in line with the other bids received by the City of Wildomar.

Regards,
Gordon Kline
Project Manager
473

CHANGE ORDER REQUEST
To: City of Wildomar
23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suit e110
Wildomar, CA 92595
Transmittal Date: 08/22/23
COR No:

AAA Job No:
002
35436
Attn: Cameron Luna
Project: Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation & Slurry Seal Project, CIP 057-2, CIP 058-2 RE: Bid Calculation Error
Public Works Estimator / Project Manager
Gordon Kline

RECEIVED BY, TRANSMITTED BY,
No Unit Price Total Price

COMMENTS

APPROVED AS NOTED

APPROVED REVISE & RESUBMIT

REJECTED
Please add 0 Working Day to the Contract for this Work Grand Total 1 TN $457.00 $815,745.00
2 SF $0.56 $42,670.88
3 TN $355.00 ($633,675.00)
4 SF $2.95 ($224,784.10)
($43.22)
Description QTY
Adjusted Unit Price for Bid Item #19 1,785.00
Adjusted Unit Price for Bid Item #21 76,198.00
Delete Old Unit Price for Bid Item #19 -1,785.00
Delete Old Unit Price for Bid Item #21 -76,198.00
474
475
476
477

CITY OF WILDOMAR

CC - REGULAR MEETING

CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.12
Meeting Date: October 11, 2023
SUBJECT: Bundy Canyon Plaza Phase 2 - Mass Grading Agreement SUBMITTED BY: Jason Farag
PREPARED BY: Ninette Eva
ACTION:

Authorize the City Manager to execute the Mass Grading Agreement with Bundy I-15, LP, a California Limited Partnership (Developer).

SUMMARY:

The Developer is required to enter into a mass grading agreement to complete mass grading activities. The agreement identifies the Developer’s obligations to the City in performing and completing the mass grading construction and provides the City with a bond to secure the mass grading activities for the project.

BACKGROUND:

On July 15, 2009, Parcel Map 32257 was approved by the City to subdivide 6.64 acres into six commercial parcels, one joint access parcel, the vacation of a portion of Cherry Street and the dedication of right-of-way for Bundy Canyon Road. The project is located south of Bundy Canyon Road, East of I-15 and west of Monte Vista Drive. An aerial image of the project site and the surrounding area is provided in Attachment A.

On June 25, 2012, the Developer entered into a phasing agreement with the City. Phase 1 was to construct the gasoline service station and car wash and Phase 2 is to construct drivethru restaurants and retail buildings. Phase 1 was previously completed and this year, the Developer started processing the Phase 2 mass grading and improvement plans with the City.

DISCUSSION:

In order to complete the mass grading activities, the Developer is required to enter into a Mass Grading Agreement (Attachment B) which identifies the Developer’s obligations to the City in 478
performing and completing the mass grading construction. The agreement also provides the City with a bond to secure the mass grading activities for the project. If the Developer fails to fulfill their obligations, the bond provides a mechanism for the City to ensure that the construction site is brought to a safe and acceptable condition.

The bond amount is based on the Developer’s engineer’s grading bond estimate shown as part of Attachment B.

Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Mass Grading Agreement with the Developer.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There are no fiscal impacts to the City at this time. All costs related to this process are covered by developer deposits.

ATTACHMENTS:

A - Aerial Map
B - Mass Grading Agreement, Faithful Performance Bond and Grading Bond Estimate 479

ATTACHMENT A
Aerial Image of
Bundy Canyon Plaza Project PM32257
(highlighted in yellow)
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
City of Wildomar
Grading Bond Estimate Worksheet
Parcel Map/Tract Map No: 32257 Date: 8/10/2023
PP, CU, PU, MS OR VL No: PA 08-0179 City Project No: 22-0219 Quantity Unit Unit Cost Amount
1 LS 9,500.00$ 9,500.00$
1 LS 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$
6 AC -$
2,142 CY 0.60$ 1,285.20$
18,652 CY 2.80$ 52,225.6$
400 LF 8.00$ 3,200.00$
2,650 LF 8.00$ 21,200.00$
1 EA 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$
AC -$
10 EA 4.00$ 40.00$
9,445.08$
104,000.00$
8/10/2023
Signature Date
Jacob Vandervis, P.E.

Name (type or printed) Vice President, COO
C46301
RCE No. Expiration Date
Civil Engineer's Stamp

1. Quantities are to be taken from the Improvement Plans.

2. Show Performance Bond Amounts to the nearest $500.00.

3. For Construction items not covered by this worksheet, Design Engineer is to provide his opinion of construction cost and use that cost.
*** PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS BELOW ***
Total
10% Contingency
Place Gravel Bags to Protect Catch Basin
Soil Binder
Install Stabilized Construction Entrance
Silt Fence
Place Gravel Bags 2 Course High
Mobilization
Item
Erosion Control
Rough Grading
Demolition and Removal
Contractor Mobilization
Import and Export Material
Mass Excavation
Clearing and Grubbing
Temporary Facilities and Utilities
Insert Project Name - Insert Project No. 492

CITY OF WILDOMAR

CC - REGULAR MEETING

CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.13
Meeting Date: October 11, 2023
SUBJECT: Tract Map 31896 - D.R. Horton Avalino Final Map Approval and Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SUBMITTED BY: Jason Farag
PREPARED BY: Ninette Eva
ACTION:

Adopt a Resolution entitled:

RESOLUTION NO. 2023 - _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31896 AVALINO AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT

AGREEMENT
SUMMARY:

Approval of the Final Map and a Subdivision Improvement for Tract No. 31896 Avalino.

BACKGROUND:

Tentative Tract Map No. 31896 was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on January 9, 2007. The tentative tract map was to subdivide 46.73 acres into 131 lots for single family development (7,200 sq. ft. minimum) and a 6.67-acre open space lot.

On December 2, 2015 the Planning Commission approved a minor change under the requirements of Title 16, Section 16.12.220 of the Wildomar Municipal Code (Subdivision Ordinance). On March 18, 2020 the Planning Commission approved a second minor change which included a reduction of total number of approved lots to 117 residential lots, the addition of three City owned/ maintained lots for water quality treatment and detention, and construction of frontage improvements on Palomar Street and Washington Avenue. An aerial image of the project site and the surrounding area is provided in Attachment A.

DISCUSSION:
493
The developer has submitted a Final Map for Tract No. 31896 (Attachment B). The Final Map submitted for approval has been examined and checked for compliance with the Wildomar Municipal Code and the California Subdivision Map Act. The City Engineer has determined that the location and configuration of the lots created by this Final Map substantially comply with the Tentative Map as filed and approved.

To secure the incomplete public improvements that are required of the project prior to map recordation, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement has been prepared (Attachment C). The Subdivision Improvement Agreement identifies the subdivider's obligations to complete the Project’s improvements and sets forth policies and procedures for the Developer and the City to ensure that the improvements are completed. The Agreement also provides the City with bonds/securities should the Developer fail to fulfill their obligations.

Conditions of approval related to Final Map recordation not yet satisfied have been identified in Exhibit D of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. The applicant has been processing CC&Rs with the City for review. The CC&Rs are required prior to map recordation and are near completion and approval. Staff will not release the final map for recordation until the CC&Rs are approved and ready for recordation, consistent with Condition of Approval No.

50.Planning.33.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There are no fiscal impacts to the City at this time. All costs related to this project are currently covered by Developer deposits. When the project is constructed, the City will be responsible for the maintenance of the public improvements after acceptance by the City Council. The Developer has annexed into the Community Facilities District (CFD) Services to offset some of the City’s maintenance costs.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
A -TR 31896 Aerial Map
B - Tract No. 31896 Final Map
C - TR 31896 Subdivision Improvement Agreement
494
RESOLUTION NO. 2023 - _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31896

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE SUBDIVISION

IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tentative Tract Map 31896 subject to conditions, on January 9, 2007 prior to the City of Wildomar’s incorporation; and
WHEREAS, on December 2, 2015 the Planning Commission approved a minor change under the requirements of Title 16, Section 16.12.220 of the Wildomar Municipal Code (Subdivision Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2020 the Planning Commission approved a second minor change which included a reduction of total number of approved lots to 117 residential lots, the addition of three City owned/ maintained lots for water quality treatment and detention, and construction of frontage improvements on Palomar Street and Washington Avenue; and
WHEREAS, consistent with the approved Tentative Map, D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc. a California corporation, submitted to the City for approval the Final Map; and
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the proposed Final Map and finds it to be technically correct and that all applicable final map conditions of approval have been satisfied or otherwise identified as outstanding in a Subdivision Improvement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 39384 was adopted for Tentative Tract Map No. 31896 by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on January 9, 2007; and
WHEREAS, the Subdivision Improvement Agreement supersedes the following recorded Public Improvement Agreements for Tract Map No. 31896, Onsite Improvement Agreement - County Document No. 2023-0227443, Offsite Improvement Agreement – County Document No. 2023-0227444, EVMWD Offsite Improvement Agreement – County Document No. 2023-0255848, EVMWD Onsite Improvement Agreement – County Document No. 2023-0255849, Storm Drain Improvement Agreement – County Document No. 2023-0227445 and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Storm Drain Agreement – County Document No. 2023- 0255847; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that this Final Map is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Statutory Exemptions, Title 14 of 495
the California Code of Regulations Section 15268, (b) (3) Ministerial Projects, approval of final subdivision maps.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the Wildomar City Council, in regular session assembled on October 11, 2023, the following:

1. The location and configuration of the lots to be created by the Final Map substantially comply with the previously approved Tentative Map; and

2. The Final Map is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Statutory Exemptions, Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Section 15268, (b) (3) Ministerial projects, approval of final subdivision maps; and

3. The City Council of the City of Wildomar, pursuant to Government Code Section 66458, hereby approves the Final Map, and:
a. Directs the City Surveyor to sign the Final Map; and b. Directs the City Engineer to sign the Final Map; and c. Directs the City Clerk to sign the Final Map; and
d. Directs the City Manager to execute the Subdivision Improvement for Tract No. 31896 incorporated herein by this reference; and e. Directs the City Clerk to transmit the Final Map and Agreements to the County Recorder of the County of Riverside for filing; and f. Directs the City Clerk to transmit the Notice of Exemption to the County Clerk of the County of Riverside for filing.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of October, 2023. ______________________________
Joseph Morabito
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
______________________________ ______________________________ Thomas D. Jex Janet Morales
City Attorney City Clerk
496
497
498
499
M.B. 275/1-5
M.B. 309/63-72
P.M.B. 197/1-3

WASHINGTON AVENUE
PALOMAR STREET SHEET OF 12 SHEETS I:\40018\MAPPING\TR31896 SHT 9-18-2023 IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 31896 DARYL J. CHRISTIAN, L.S. 8554 MDS CONSULTING JULY, 2023 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 2, 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP 8828, AS FILED IN BOOK 43, PAGE 99 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF BLOCK "M" AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 174 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. 2 TRACT NO. 23187-2 P.M.B. 43/99 PARCEL MAP 8828 PAR. 1 PAR. 2 PAR. 3 PAR. 4 PARCEL MAP 29005 DOC. No. LLA 4447 2002-555294 DOC. No. LLA 4447 2002-555294 PAR. A PAR. B BOUNDARY SURVEY WASHINGTON AVENUE DETAIL "B" DETAIL "A" R.S. 153/28 TRACT 28333-4 PARCEL 1 500
M.B. 275/1-5

WASHINGTON AVENUE

PALOMAR STREET
SHEET OF 12 SHEETS
I:\40018\MAPPING\TR31896 SHT 9-18-2023
TRACT NO. 31896

IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DARYL J. CHRISTIAN, L.S. 8554 MDS CONSULTING JULY, 2023 SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.

LLA 4447
2002-555294
PAR. A
501
M.B. 275/1-5
M.B. 275/1-5

WASHINGTON AVENUE
SHEET OF 12 SHEETS
I:\40018\MAPPING\TR31896 SHT 9-18-2023
TRACT NO. 31896

IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DARYL J. CHRISTIAN, L.S. 8554 MDS CONSULTING JULY, 2023 SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.

BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 174 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF BLOCK "M" AS SHOWN BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 2, 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP 8828, AS FILED IN BOOK 43, PAGE 99 OF PARCEL 4 SHEET INDEX MAP
5 6
6 7
5 6
6 7
7 8
7 8
9 9
10 10 11
11 10
12 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
55 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
70 71
LOT K
72 73
74 75
76 77
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 93
94 95
96 97
98 99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
LOT M
N.A.P.

COPA DE ORO COURT
DANDE
LOT D

WESTERN GOLDENROD STREET
BLOOM
LOT H

BABY BLUE COURT
DESERT
LOT A
LOT C

BUSH SUNFLOWER COURT
LOT E
LOT F

OLIVET WAY
LOT G
LOT B

LILY COURT
DESERT
COURT

PALOMAR STREET
LION

LOT I EVENING PRIMROSE COURT
COURT
WASHINGTON AVE.

STARBUCK CIRCLE
LOT L
12 TRACT 23187-2
TRACT 28333-4

PALOMAR STREET
LOT V
WASHINGTON AVE.

LOT N
LOT O
LOT P
LOT Q
LOT R
LOT S
LOT T
LOT U
LOT X
LOT W
LOT J
LOT Y
LOT Z
502
SHEET OF 12 SHEETS I:\40018\MAPPING\TR31896 SHT 9-18-2023 IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 31896 DARYL J. CHRISTIAN, L.S. 8554 MDS CONSULTING JULY, 2023 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 2, 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP 8828, AS FILED IN BOOK 43, PAGE 99 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF BLOCK "M" AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 174 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. 5 1 2 3 7 6 5 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 24 26 28 27 29 LOT "A" PALOMAR STREET PALOMAR STREET STARBUCK CIRCLE SEE SHEET 6 P.M.B. 197/1-3 PARCEL MAP 29005 LOT "Y" COPA DE ORO COURT PARCEL 1 LOT "A" LOT "C" LOT "N" LOT "O" 503
SHEET OF 12 SHEETS I:\40018\MAPPING\TR31896 SHT 9-18-2023 IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 31896 DARYL J. CHRISTIAN, L.S. 8554 MDS CONSULTING JULY, 2023 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 2, 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP 8828, AS FILED IN BOOK 43, PAGE 99 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF BLOCK "M" AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 174 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. 6 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 25 24 23 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 3839 40 42 41 43 44 45 47 46 48 LOT "B" STARBUCK CIRCLE SEE SHEET 5 SEE SHEET 7 P.M.B. 197/1-3 PARCEL MAP 29005 DOC. No. LLA 4447 2002-555294 PAR. A LOT "Y" DESERT LILY COURT R.S. 153/28PARCEL 1 LOT "C" LOT "O" LOT "P" 504
SHEET OF 12 SHEETS I:\40018\MAPPING\TR31896 SHT 9-18-2023 IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 31896 DARYL J. CHRISTIAN, L.S. 8554 MDS CONSULTING JULY, 2023 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 2, 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP 8828, AS FILED IN BOOK 43, PAGE 99 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF BLOCK "M" AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 174 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. 7 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 42 41 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 5051 52 57 5859 6061 62 63 64 65 66 LOT "J" LOT "C" LOT "D" STARBUCK CIRCLE SEE SHEET 6 SEE SHEET 8 LOT "Y" DOC. No. LLA 4447 2002-555294 PAR. A R.S. 8/98 P.M.B. 43/99 PARCEL MAP 8828 DESERT DANDELION COURT BUSH SUNFLOWER COURT R.S. 153/28 LOT "P" LOT "Q" LOT "X" LOT "W" 505
SHEET OF 12 SHEETS I:\40018\MAPPING\TR31896 SHT 9-18-2023 IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 31896 DARYL J. CHRISTIAN, L.S. 8554 MDS CONSULTING JULY, 2023 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 2, 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP 8828, AS FILED IN BOOK 43, PAGE 99 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF BLOCK "M" AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 174 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. 8 51 52 5354 OPEN SPACE55 56 5758 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 LOT "J" LOT "D" SEE SHEET 7 SEE SHEET 9
STARBUCK CIRCLE 118 WESTERN GOLDENROD STREET DOC. No. LLA 4447 2002-555294 PAR. A R.S. 8/98R.S. 107/83 BUSH SUNFLOWER COURT LOT "E" LOT "K" BIO-RETENTION BASIN OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE R.S. 153/28 LOT "Z" 506
SHEET OF 12 SHEETS I:\40018\MAPPING\TR31896 SHT 9-18-2023 IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 31896 DARYL J. CHRISTIAN, L.S. 8554 MDS CONSULTING JULY, 2023 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 2, 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP 8828, AS FILED IN BOOK 43, PAGE 99 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF BLOCK "M" AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 174 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. 9 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 85 LOT "L" LOT 118 LOT "E" SEE SHEET 8 SEE SHEET 10 SEE SHEET 12 DOC. No. LLA 4447 2002-555294 PAR. A R.S. 107/83 WESTERN GOLDENROD STREET STARBUCK CIRCLE OPEN SPACE BIO-RETENTION BASIN OPEN SPACE/DRAINAGE R.S. 153/28

LOT Z LOT K
SEE SHEET 8
507
SHEET OF 12 SHEETS I:\40018\MAPPING\TR31896 SHT 9-18-2023 IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 31896 DARYL J. CHRISTIAN, L.S. 8554 MDS CONSULTING JULY, 2023 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 2, 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP 8828, AS FILED IN BOOK 43, PAGE 99 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF BLOCK "M" AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 174 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. 10 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96979899 100 101 102103 104 105 106 LOT "L" 118 LOT "M" LOT "E" LOT "F" SEE SHEET 11 SEE SHEET 12 SEE SHEET 9
M.B. 309/63-72 TRACT NO. 23187-2 DOC. No. LLA 4447 2002-555294 PAR. A R.S. 107/83 WESTERN GOLDENROD STREET BLOOM COURT LOT "H" OLIVET
WAY OPEN SPACE DETENTION BASIN OPEN SPACE R.S. 153/28 20 191816151413 LOT "S" LOT "R" 508
SHEET OF 12 SHEETS
I:\40018\MAPPING\TR31896 SHT 9-18-2023
TRACT NO. 31896

IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DARYL J. CHRISTIAN, L.S. 8554 MDS CONSULTING JULY, 2023 SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.

WASHINGTON AVENUE
LOT "H"
N.A.P
SEE SHEET 10
DOC. No.

LLA 4447
2002-555294
PAR. A OLIVET WAY

BABY BLUE COURT

EVENING PRIMROSE COURT

NGTON AVENUE
WASHI
R.S. 153/28
LOT "T"
LOT "U"
LOT "V"
509
SHEET OF 12 SHEETS I:\40018\MAPPING\TR31896 SHT 9-18-2023 IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 31896 DARYL J. CHRISTIAN, L.S. 8554 MDS CONSULTING JULY, 2023 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 2, 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP 8828, AS FILED IN BOOK 43, PAGE 99 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF BLOCK "M" AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 174 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. 12 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 969798 121 118 LOT "M" LOT "F" M.B. 309/63-72 TRACT NO. 23187-2 SEE SHEET 10 SEE SHEET 9
R.S. 107/83 OPEN SPACE DETENTION BASIN OPEN SPACE/DRAINAGE BLOOM COURT 2120 1918 LOT "N" LOT "R" 510
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2

RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
(Document exempt from recording fees
pursuant to Cal. Gov. Code § 27383)

CITY OF WILDOMAR
Attn: City Clerk
23873 Clinton Keith Rd., Suite 111
Wildomar, California 92595
THIS SPACE FOR RECORDER’S USE ONLY

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
FINAL TRACT MAP 31896
By and Between

THE CITY OF WILDOMAR,
a municipal corporation
and
D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc.
a California corporation
DATED October 11, 2023
511
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 1 -

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
FINAL TRACT MAP 31896
This Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of this 11th day of October, 2023 by and between the City of Wildomar, a municipal corporation (“City”) and D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc., a California corporation (“Developer”). City and Developer are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. Developer has submitted to City an application for approval of a final tract map for real property located within City, a legal description of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.

The tract map is identified in City records as Tract Map No. 31896. On January 9, 2007, the County of Riverside conditionally approved Tract No. 31896.

B. On December 2, 2015 the Planning Commission approved a minor change under the requirements of Title 16, Section 16.12.220 of the Wildomar Municipal Code (Subdivision Ordinance).

C. On March 18, 2020 the Planning Commission approved a second minor change which included a reduction of total number of approved lots to 117 residential lots, the addition of three City owned/ maintained lots for water quality treatment and detention, and construction of frontage improvements on Palomar Street and Washington Avenue.

D. Developer has not completed all of the work or made all of the Public Improvements required by the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code sections 66410 et seq.), (“Map Act”) the City Ordinances, the conditions of approval for Tract No. 31896, or other ordinances, resolutions, or policies of City requiring construction of improvements in conjunction with the subdivision of land.

E. Pursuant to City Ordinances and the applicable provisions of the Map Act, Developer and City enter into this Agreement for the timely construction and completion of the Public Improvements and the furnishing of the security therefor, acceptable to the City Engineer and City Attorney, for Tract No. 31896.

E. City has authority to enter into this Subdivision Improvement Agreement pursuant to Government Code Sections 66499 – 66499.10.

F. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66499, Developer’s execution of this Agreement and the provision of the security are made in consideration of City’s approval of the final map for Tract No. 31896.

G. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement supersedes the following recorded Public Improvement Agreements for Tract Map No. 31896, Onsite Improvement Agreement - 512
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 2 -
County Document No. 2023-0227443, Offsite Improvement Agreement – County Document No. 2023-0227444, EVMWD Offsite Improvement Agreement – County Document No. 2023- 0255848, EVMWD Onsite Improvement Agreement – County Document No. 2023-0255849, Storm Drain Improvement Agreement – County Document No. 2023-0227445 and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Storm Drain Agreement – County Document No. 2023-0255847.

DEFINED TERMS
“Developer” shall mean D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, a California corporation.

The term “Developer” shall also include all assignees, to the extent permitted under this Agreement, of the rights and obligations of Developer under this Agreement, and any successorin-interest to Developer having a legal and/or equitable interest in the Property. “Estimated Costs” shall mean the City Engineer’s approximation of the actual cost to construct the Public Improvements, including the replacement cost for all landscaping. “Litigation Expenses” shall mean all costs and expenses, to the extent reasonable in amount, actually and necessarily incurred by a party in good faith in the prosecution of an action or proceeding, including, but not limited to, court costs, filing, recording, and service fees, copying costs, exhibit production costs, special media rental costs, attorneys’ fees, fees for investigators, witness fees (both lay and expert), travel expenses, deposition and transcript costs and any other cost or expense, the award of which a court of competent jurisdiction may determine to be just and reasonable.
“Map Act” shall mean the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Sections 66410 et seq. “Property” shall mean the all of the real property contained within the boundaries of Tract Map No. 31896 located in the City of Wildomar, California, as is more particularly described in the legal description and tract diagram attached hereto and incorporated hereby by reference at Exhibit “A”.
“Public Improvements” shall include, but not be limited to, all grading, roads, streets, paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, paseos, pathways, trails, sanitary sewers, utilities, storm drains, detention and retention basins and other drainage facilities, traffic controls, landscaping, street lights and all other facilities required to be constructed and dedicated to the City or other public entity as conditions of approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 31896 and as shown in detail on the plans, and specifications which have been approved by the City and incorporated into Tract Map No. 31896. The Parties agree that the Public Improvements to be completed by Developer are more specifically described in the diagram or plan attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit “B. Notwithstanding, Exhibit “B”, Developer shall remain obligated to construct and complete all of the Public Improvements required as conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map 31896.
“Required Insurance” shall mean the insurance required to be maintained by Developer under Section 17.
513
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 3 -
“Security” shall mean surety bonds, lien agreement or other security approved by the City Engineer or City Attorney in the amounts and under the terms of Section 12. “Tract No 31896.” shall mean the final map prepared and approved by the City for tentative tract map no. 31896.
“Warranty” shall mean the one year period following completion of the Public Improvements by Developer and the acceptance of the Public Improvements by the City in which Developer warrants and guarantees all Public Improvements.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1. EFFECTIVENESS. This Agreement shall not be effective unless and until all four (4) of the following conditions are satisfied in the order provided (Items 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 may occur in any sequence, but they shall occur prior to items 1.4 and 1.5):

1.1 Security. Developer provides City with the Security of the type and in the amounts required by this Agreement;

1.2 Final Map and Agreement Approval. The City Council of the City (“City Council”) approves the final map for Tract No. 31896 and this Agreement;

1.3 Execute Agreement. Developer and City execute the Agreement;

1.4 Record Agreement. City records this Agreement in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Riverside; and

1.5 Record Final Map. Developer records the final map for Tract No. 31896 in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Riverside.

If the above described conditions are not satisfied in the order, manner and within the time provided under this Agreement, this Agreement shall automatically terminate without need of further action by either City or Developer.

2. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. Developer shall construct or have constructed at its own cost, expense, and liability the Public Improvements, as defined herein, within the time and in the manner required under this Agreement. Construction of the Public Improvements shall include any transitions and/or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. The Developer shall be responsible for the replacement, relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water or sewer system in conflict with the construction or installation of the Public Improvements. Such replacement, relocation, or removal shall be performed to the complete satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water or sewer system.

Developer further promises and agrees to provide all equipment, tools, materials, labor, tests, design work, and engineering services necessary or required by City to fully and adequately complete the Public Improvements.
514
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 4 -

2.1 Prior Partial Construction of Public Improvements. Where construction of any Public Improvements has been partially completed prior to this Agreement, Developer agrees to complete such Public Improvements or assure their completion in accordance with this Agreement.

2.2 Permits; Notices; Utility Statements. Prior to commencing any work, Developer shall, at its sole cost, expense, and liability, obtain all necessary permits and approvals and give all necessary and incidental notices required for the lawful construction of the Public Improvements and performance of Developer’s obligations under this Agreement. Developer shall conduct the work in full compliance with the regulations, rules, and other requirements contained in any permit or approval issued to Developer. Prior to commencing any work, Developer shall file a written statement with the City Clerk and the City Engineer, signed by Developer and each utility which will provide utility service to the Property, attesting that Developer has made all deposits legally required by the utility for the extension and provision of utility service to the Property.

2.3 Pre-approval of Plans and Specifications. Developer is prohibited from commencing work on any Public Improvement until all plans and specifications for such Public Improvement have been submitted to and approved by the City Engineer, or his or her designee.

Approval by the City Engineer shall not relieve Developer from ensuring that all Public Improvements conform with all other requirements and standards set forth in this Agreement.

2.4 Quality of Work; Compliance With Laws and Codes. The construction plans and specifications for the Public Improvements shall be prepared in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, regulations, codes, standards, and other requirements. The Public Improvements shall be completed in accordance with all approved maps, plans, specifications, standard drawings, and special amendments thereto on file with City, as well as all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, regulations, codes, standards, and other requirements applicable at the time work is actually commenced.

2.5 Standard of Performance. Developer and its contractors, if any, shall perform all work required to construct the Public Improvements under this Agreement in a skillful and workmanlike manner, and consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Developer represents and maintains that it or its contractors shall be skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the work. Developer warrants that all of its employees and contractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the work assigned to them, and that they shall have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the work, and that such licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement.

2.6 Alterations to Improvements. All work shall be done and improvements made and completed as shown on approved plans and specifications, and any subsequent alterations thereto. If during the course of construction and installation of the Public Improvements it is determined that the public interest requires alterations in the Public Improvements, Developer shall undertake such design and construction changes as may be reasonably required by City. Any and all alterations in the plans and specifications and the Public Improvements to be completed may be accomplished without giving prior notice thereof to Developer’s surety for this Agreement. 515
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 5 -

2.7 Other Obligations Referenced in Conditions of Tentative Map Approval. In addition to the foregoing, Developer shall satisfy all of the conditions of approval on the tentative map for the Property. The conditions of approval which have not been satisfied prior to the date of this Agreement are identified on Exhibit “D” hereto.

3. MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND LANDSCAPING.

City shall not be responsible or liable for the maintenance or care of the Public Improvements until City formally approves and accepts them in accordance with its policies and procedures. City shall exercise no control over the Public Improvements until approved and accepted. Any use by any person of the Public Improvements, or any portion thereof, shall be at the sole and exclusive risk of the Developer at all times prior to City’s acceptance of the Public Improvements. Developer shall maintain all the Public Improvements in a state of good repair until they are completed by Developer and approved and accepted by City, and until the security for the performance of this Agreement is released. Maintenance shall include, but shall not be limited to, repair of pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, signals, parkways, water mains, and sewers; maintaining all landscaping in a vigorous and thriving condition reasonably acceptable to City; removal of debris from sewers and storm drains; and sweeping, repairing, and maintaining in good and safe condition all streets and street improvements. It shall be Developer’s responsibility to initiate all maintenance work, but if it shall fail to do so, it shall promptly perform such maintenance work when notified to do so by City. If Developer fails to properly prosecute its maintenance obligation under this section, City may do all work necessary for such maintenance and the cost thereof shall be the responsibility of Developer and its surety under this Agreement. City shall not be responsible or liable for any damages or injury of any nature in any way related to or caused by the Public Improvements or their condition prior to acceptance.

4. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. Unless extended pursuant to this Section 4.1 of this Agreement, Developer shall fully and adequately complete or have completed the Public Improvements within two years (twenty-four months) following approval of the final map for Tract No. 31896.

4.1 Extensions. City may, in its sole and absolute discretion, provide Developer with additional time within which to complete the Public Improvements. It is understood that by providing the Security required under Section 12.0 et seq. of this Agreement, Developer and its surety consent in advance to any extension of time as may be given by City to Developer, and waives any and all right to notice of such extension(s). Developer’s acceptance of an extension of time granted by City shall constitute a waiver by Developer and its surety of all defense of laches, estoppel, statutes of limitations, and other limitations of action in any action or proceeding filed by City following the date on which the Public Improvements were to have been completed hereunder. In addition, as consideration for granting such extension to Developer, City reserves the right to review the provisions of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the construction standards, the cost estimates established by City, and the sufficiency of the Security provided by Developer, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted according to City’s reasonable discretion.

4.2 Accrual of Limitations Period. Any limitations period provided by law related to breach of this Agreement or the terms thereof shall not accrue until Developer has provided the City Engineer with written notice of Developer’s intent to abandon or otherwise not complete required or agreed upon Public Improvements.
516
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 6 -

5. GRADING. Developer agrees that any and all grading done or to be done in conjunction with construction of the Public Improvements or development of Tract No. 31896 shall conform to all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, regulations, and other requirements, including City’s grading regulations. All grading, landscaping, and construction activities shall be performed in a manner to control erosion and prevent flooding problems. The City Engineer shall have the authority to require erosion plans to prescribe reasonable controls on the method, manner, and time of grading, landscaping, and construction activities to prevent nuisances to surrounding properties. Plans shall include without limitation temporary drainage and erosion control requirements, dust control procedures, restrictions on truck and other construction traffic routes, noise abatement procedures, storage of materials and equipment, removal of garbage, trash, and refuse, securing the job site to prevent injury, and similar matters. In order to prevent damage to the Public Improvements by improper drainage or other hazards, the grading shall be completed in accordance with the time schedule for completion of the Public Improvements established by this Agreement, and prior to City’s approval and acceptance of the Public Improvements and release of the Security as set forth in Section 12.0 et seq. of this Agreement.

6. UTILITIES. Developer shall provide utility services, including water, sewer, power, gas, and telephone service to serve each parcel, lot, or unit of land within Tract No. 31896 in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations, including, but not limited to, the regulations, schedules and fees of the utilities or agencies providing such services. Except for commercial or industrial properties, Developer shall also provide cable television facilities to serve each parcel, lot, or unit of land in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the cable company possessing a valid franchise with City to provide such service within City’s jurisdictional limits. All utilities shall be installed underground.

7. FEES AND CHARGES. Developer shall, at its sole cost, expense, and liability, pay all fees, charges, and taxes arising out of construction of the Public Improvements, including, but not limited to, all plan check, design review, engineering, inspection, and other service fees, and any impact or connection fees established by City ordinance, resolution, regulation, or policy, or as established by City relative to Tract No. 31896, or as required by other governmental agencies having jurisdiction over Tract No. 31896.

8. CITY INSPECTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. Developer shall, at its sole cost, expense, and liability, and at all times during construction of the Public Improvements, maintain reasonable and safe facilities and provide safe access for inspection by City of the Public Improvements and areas where construction of the Public Improvements is occurring or will occur.

If the City inspector requests it, the Developer at any time before acceptance of the Public Improvements shall remove or uncover such portions of the finished work as may be directed which have not previously been inspected. After examination, the Developer shall restore said portions of the work to the standards required hereunder. Inspection or supervision by the City shall not be considered as direct control of the individual workmen on the job site. City’s inspector shall have the authority to stop any and all work not in accordance with the requirements contained or referenced in this Agreement. The inspection of the work by City shall not relieve Developer or the contractor of any obligations to fulfill this Agreement as herein provided, and unsuitable materials or work may be rejected notwithstanding that such materials or work may have been previously overlooked or accepted.
517
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 7 -

9. ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS. If Developer fails to construct and install all or any part of the Public Improvements within the time required by this Agreement, or if Developer fails to comply with any other obligation contained herein, Developer and its surety shall be jointly and severally liable to City for all administrative expenses, fees, and costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, incurred in obtaining compliance with this Agreement or in processing any legal action or for any other remedies permitted by law.

10. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS; AS-BUILT OR RECORD
DRAWINGS. The City Council may, in its sole and absolute discretion, accept fully completed portions of the Public Improvements prior to such time as all of the Public Improvements are complete, which shall not release or modify Developer’s obligation to complete the remainder of the Public Improvements within the time required by this Agreement.

10.1 Developer’s Notice of Completion. Upon the total or partial acceptance of the Public Improvements by City, Developer shall file with the Recorder’s Office of the County of Riverside a notice of completion for the accepted Public Improvements in accordance with Article 2 of Chapter 4 of Title 2 of Part 6 of Division 4 of the Civil Code, at which time the accepted Public Improvements shall become the sole and exclusive property of City without payment therefor.

10.2 City Acceptance of Public Improvements. If Tract No. 31896 was approved and recorded as a single phase map, City shall not accept any one or more of the improvements until all of the Public Improvements are completed by Developer and approved by City. Issuance by City of occupancy permits for any buildings or structures located on the Property shall not be construed in any manner to constitute City’s acceptance or approval of any Public Improvements.

10.3 Developer’s Obligation to Provide As-Built or Record Drawings.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, City may not accept any Public Improvements unless and until Developer provides one (1) set of “as-built” or record drawings or plans to the City Engineer for all such Public Improvements. The drawings shall be certified and shall reflect the condition of the Public Improvements as constructed, with all changes incorporated therein.

11. WARRANTY AND GUARANTEE. Developer hereby warrants and guarantees all Public Improvements against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished in the performance of this Agreement, including the maintenance of all landscaping within the Property in a vigorous and thriving condition reasonably acceptable to City, for a period of one (1) year following completion of the work and acceptance by City. During the Warranty, Developer shall repair, replace, or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory portion of the Public Improvements, in accordance with the current ordinances, resolutions, regulations, codes, standards, or other requirements of City, and to the approval of the City Engineer. All repairs, replacements, or reconstruction during the Warranty shall be at the sole cost, expense, and liability of Developer and its surety. As to any Public Improvements which have been repaired, replaced, or reconstructed during the Warranty, Developer and its surety hereby agree to extend the Warranty for an additional one (1) year period following City’s acceptance of the repaired, replaced, or reconstructed Public Improvements. Nothing herein shall relieve Developer from any other liability it may have under federal, state, or local law to repair, replace, or reconstruct any Public Improvement following expiration of the Warranty or any extension thereof. Developer’s 518
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 8 -
warranty obligation under this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

12. SECURITY. Prior to City’s approval and execution of this Agreement, Developer shall provide City with surety bonds, a lien agreement, or another form of security acceptable to the City Attorney and City Engineer under the terms set forth below.

12.1 Surety Bonds. If surety bonds are provided as Security, the amount of the Security shall be based on the City Engineer’s Estimated Costs. If City determines at any time prior to Developer’s completion of the Public Improvements under Section 4 [Construction Schedule], in its sole and absolute discretion, that the Estimated Costs have changed, Developer shall adjust the Security in the amount requested by City. Developer’s compliance with this provision (Section 12.0 et seq.) shall in no way limit or modify Developer’s indemnification obligation provided in Section 16.0 of this Agreement.

12.1.1 Performance Bond. To guarantee the faithful performance of the Public Improvements and all the provisions of this Agreement, to protect City if Developer is in default as set forth in Section 18.0 et seq. of this Agreement, and to secure Developer’s one-year guarantee and warranty of the Public Improvements, including the maintenance of all landscaping in a vigorous and thriving condition, Developer shall provide City a faithful performance bond in the amount of Eleven Million Thirty Five Thousand One Hundred Fourteen and No/100 Dollars ($11,035,114.00), which sum shall be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Estimated Costs.

12.1.2 Partial Release. The City Council may, in its sole and absolute discretion and upon recommendation of the City Engineer, partially release a portion or portions of the Security provided under this section as the Public Improvements are accepted by City, provided that Developer is not in default on any provision of this Agreement or condition of approval for Tract No. 31896, and the total remaining Security is not less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the Estimated Costs. All Security provided under this section shall be released at the end of the Warranty period, or any extension thereof as provided in Section 11.0 of this Agreement, provided that Developer is not in default on any provision of this Agreement or condition of approval for Tract No. 31896.

12.1.3 Labor & Material Bond. To secure payment to the contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material men, and other persons furnishing labor, materials, or equipment for performance of the Public Improvements and this Agreement, Developer shall provide City a labor and materials bond in the amount of Five Million Five Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Fifty-Seven and No/100 Dollars ($5,517,557.00), which sum shall not be less than fifty percent (50%) of the Estimated Costs. The Security provided under this section may be released by written authorization of the City Engineer after six (6) months from the date City accepts the final Public Improvements. The amount of such Security shall be reduced by the total of all stop notice or mechanic’s lien claims of which City is aware, plus an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of such claims for reimbursement of City’s anticipated administrative and legal expenses arising out of such claims.

12.1.4 Additional Requirements. The surety for any surety bonds provided as Security shall have a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VIII, be a bank or 519
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 9 -
insurance company licensed to transact surety business in California, and shall be satisfactory to City. As part of the obligation secured by the Security and in addition to the face amount of the Security, the Developer or its surety shall secure the costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, incurred by City in enforcing the obligations of this Agreement. The Developer and its surety stipulate and agree that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of this Agreement, the Public Improvements, or the plans and specifications for the Public Improvements shall in any way affect its obligation on the Security.

12.1.5 Form of Bonds. The evidence of the Security shall be provided on the forms set forth in Exhibit “C”, unless other forms are deemed acceptable by the City Engineer and the City Attorney, and when such forms are completed to the satisfaction of City, the forms and evidence of the Security shall be attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference.

12.2 Lien Agreement. In lieu of surety bonds required under Section 12.1 et seq. or the security required by Section 13 of this Agreement, Developer may execute a lien agreement as Security for the Improvements in accordance with Wildomar Municipal Code Section 16.56.030. The Lien Agreement shall be in the form attached hereto as Exhibit “E” and incorporated herein by this reference.

12.3 Developer’s Liability. While no action of Developer shall be required in order for City to realize on its security under any Security instrument, Developer agrees to cooperate with City to facilitate City’s realization under any Security instrument, and to take no action to prevent City from such realization under any Security instrument. Notwithstanding the giving of any Security instrument or the subsequent expiration of any Security instrument or any failure by any surety or financial institution to perform its obligations with respect thereto, Developer shall be personally liable for performance under this Agreement and for payment of the cost of the labor and materials for the improvements required to be constructed or installed hereby and shall, within ten (10) days after written demand therefor, deliver to City such substitute Security as City shall require satisfying the requirements in this Section 12.

13. MONUMENT SECURITY. Prior to City’s execution of this Agreement, to guarantee payment to the engineer or surveyor for the setting of all subdivision boundaries, lot corners, and street centerline monuments for Tract No. 31896 in compliance with the applicable provisions of City’s Municipal and/or Development Code (“Subdivision Monuments”), Developer shall deposit cash with City in the amount of Forty Seven Thousand Five Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($47,500.00) and a surety bond in the amount of One Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($100,000.00), which sum shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the costs of setting the Subdivision Monuments as determined by the City Engineer. Said cash deposit and surety bond may be released by written authorization of the City Engineer after all required Subdivision Monuments are accepted by the City Engineer, City has received written acknowledgment of payment in full from the engineer or surveyor who set the Subdivision Monuments, and provided Developer is not in default of any provision of this Agreement or condition of approval for Tract No. 31896. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if City accepts a lien agreement as security for the Improvements under Section 12.2 of this Agreement, such lien agreement may serve as the security for some or all of the Subdivision Monuments, as determined by the City Engineer.
520
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 10 -

14. LIEN. To secure the timely performance of Developer’s obligations under this Agreement, including those obligations for which security has been provided pursuant to Sections

12.0 et seq. and 13.0 of this Agreement, Developer hereby creates in favor of City a lien against all portions of the Property not dedicated to City or some other governmental agency for a public purpose. As to Developer’s default on those obligations for which security has been provided pursuant to Sections 12.0 et seq. and 13.0 of this Agreement, City shall first attempt to collect against such security prior to exercising its rights as a contract lienholder under this section.

15. SIGNS AND ADVERTISING. Developer understands and agrees to City’s ordinances, regulations, and requirements governing signs and advertising structures. Developer hereby agrees with and consents to the summary removal by City, without notice to Developer, of all signs or other advertising structures erected, placed, or situated in violation of any City ordinance, regulation, or other requirement. Removal shall be at the expense of Developer and its surety. Developer and its surety shall indemnify and hold City free and harmless from any claim or demand arising out of or incident to signs, advertising structures, or their removal.

16. INDEMNIFICATION. Developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents from any and all actual or alleged claims, demands, causes of action, liability, loss, damage, or injury, to property or persons, including wrongful death, whether imposed by a court of law or by administrative action of any federal, state, or local governmental body or agency, arising out of or incident to any acts, omissions, negligence, or willful misconduct of Developer, its personnel, employees, agents, or contractors in connection with or arising out of construction or maintenance of the Public Improvements, or performance of this Agreement. This indemnification includes, without limitation, the payment of all penalties, fines, judgments, awards, decrees, attorneys’ fees, and related costs or expenses, and the reimbursement of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and/or agents for all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them. This indemnification excludes only such portion of any claim, demand, cause of action, liability, loss, damage, penalty, fine, or injury, to property or persons, including wrongful death, which is caused solely and exclusively by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of City as determined by a court or administrative body of competent jurisdiction. Developer’s obligation to indemnify City shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, and shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, or agents.

17. INSURANCE.

17.1 Types; Amounts. Developer shall procure and maintain, and shall require its contractors to procure and maintain, during construction of any Public Improvement pursuant to this Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described below. If any of the Required Insurance contains a general aggregate limit, such insurance shall apply separately to this Agreement or be no less than two times the specified occurrence limit.

17.1.1 General Liability. Developer and its contractors shall procure and maintain Commercial General Liability Insurance no less broad than Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CG 00 01 or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of not less than $3,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The General Aggregate shall be twice the occurrence limit or shall apply separately to each project. If Developer maintains higher limits than the specified minimum limits, City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for 521
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 11 -
the higher limits maintained by Developer. The General Liability policy shall not contain a Contractors' Warranty or other similar language which eliminates or restricts insurance because of a subcontractor's failure to carry specific insurance or to supply evidence of such insurance

17.1.2 Business Automobile Liability. Developer and its contractors shall procure and maintain business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading, or unloading of any vehicle owned, hired, and non owned by the insured or for which the insured is responsible.

17.1.3 Workers’ Compensation. Developer and its contractors shall procure and maintain workers’ compensation insurance with limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability with limits of $1,000,000 per Accident; $1,000,000 Disease per employee; $1,000,000 Disease per policy at all times during which insured retains employees.

17.1.4 Professional Liability. For any consultant or other professional who will engineer or design the Public Improvements, liability insurance for errors and omissions with limits not less than $1,000,000 per claim. Such insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. Coverage applicable to the work performed under this agreement shall be continued for five (5) years after completion of the work . Such continuation coverage may be provided by one of the following: (1) renewal of the existing policy; (2) an extended reporting period endorsement; or (3) replacement insurance with a retroactive date no later than the commencement of the work under this agreement.

17.1.5 Pollution Liability. Minimum Limits: $1,000,000 per Pollution Incident; $1,000,000 Aggregate; Coverage shall apply to pollution incidents at or from any location at which Developer and its contractors are performing work under this agreement. Any deductible or self-insured retention shall be shown on the Certificate of Insurance. If the deductible or self-insured retention exceeds $25,000 it shall be approved in advance by the City. Developer and its contractors are responsible for any deductible or self-insured retention and shall fund it upon the City’s written request, regardless of whether Developer and its contractors have a claim against the insurance or are named as a party in any action involving the City. The City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be endorsed as an additional insured for liability arising out of ongoing and completed operations by or on behalf of the Developer and its contractors. Additional insured status shall continue for one (1) year after completion of the work.

The insurance provided to the additional insureds shall apply on a primary and non-contributory basis with respect to any insurance or self-insurance program maintained by them. If the insurance is on a Claims-Made basis, the retroactive date shall be no later than the commencement of work.

The insurance shall be continued for one (1) year after completion of the work. If the insurance is on a Claims-Made basis, the continuation coverage may be provided by: (a) renewal of the existing policy; (b) an extended reporting period endorsement; or (c) replacement insurance with a retroactive date no later than the commencement of the work.

17.2 Deductibles. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either: (a) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers; or (b) Developer and its contractors shall provide a financial 522
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 12 -
guarantee satisfactory to City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims, and administrative and defense expenses.

17.3 Additional Insured; Separation of Insureds. The Required Insurance (except Workers’ Compensation and Professional Liability) shall name City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds with respect to work performed by or on behalf of Developer or its contractors, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection therewith City shall be endorsed as an additional insured for liability arising out of ongoing and completed operations by or on behalf of the contractor. City shall continue to be an additional insured for completed operations for (1) year after completion of the work. The policy shall cover inter-insured suits and include a “Separation of Insureds” or “severability” clause which treats each insured separately and shall contain no special limitations on the scope of its protection to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers.

17.4 Primary Insurance; Waiver of Subrogation. The General Liability Insurance provided to the additional insured shall be primary to, and non contributory with, any insurance or self insurance program maintained by the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. All policies for the Required Insurance shall provide that the insurance company waives all right of recovery by way of subrogation against City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

17.5 Certificates; Verification. Developer and its contractors shall furnish City with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage for the Required Insurance. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by City before work pursuant to this Agreement can begin. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

17.6 Term; Cancellation Notice. Developer and its contractors shall maintain the Required Insurance for the term of this Agreement and shall replace any certificate, policy, or endorsement which will expire prior to that date. Developer shall provide immediate written notice if (1) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the required polices are reduced; (3) or the deductible or self insured retention is increased. In the event of any cancellation or reduction in coverage or limits of any insurance, Developer shall forthwith obtain and submit proof of substitute insurance. Should Developer fail to immediately procure other insurance, as specified, to substitute for any canceled policy, the City may procure such insurance at Developer’s sole cost and expense.

17.7 Insurer Rating. Unless approved in writing by City, all Required Insurance shall placed with insurers licensed to do business in the State of California and with a current A.M. Best rating of at least A:VIII.

18. DEFAULT; NOTICE; REMEDIES.

18.1 Notice. If Developer neglects, refuses, or fails to fulfill or timely complete any obligation, term, or condition of this Agreement, or if City determines there is a violation of any federal, state, or local law, ordinance, regulation, code, standard, or other requirement, City may at any time thereafter declare Developer to be in default or violation of this Agreement and 523
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 13 -
make written demand upon Developer or its surety, or both, to immediately remedy the default or violation. Developer shall commence the work required to remedy the default or violation within ten (10) days of the written demand from the City. If the default or violation constitutes an immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, City may provide the demand verbally, and Developer shall commence the required work within twenty-four (24) hours thereof.

Immediately upon City’s issuance of the demand to remedy the default, Developer and its surety shall be liable to City for all costs of construction and installation of the Public Improvements and all other administrative costs expenses as provided for in Section 9.0 of this Agreement.

18.2 Failure to Remedy; City Action. If the work required to remedy the noticed default or violation is not diligently prosecuted to a substantial completion acceptable to City within a reasonable time designated by the City, City may complete all remaining work, arrange for the completion of all remaining work, and/or conduct such remedial activity as in its sole and absolute discretion it believes is required to remedy the default or violation. All such work or remedial activity shall be at the sole and absolute cost, expense, and liability of Developer and its surety, without the necessity of giving any further notice to Developer or surety. City’s right to take such actions shall in no way be limited by the fact that Developer or its surety may have constructed any, or none of the required or agreed upon Public Improvements at the time of City’s demand for performance. In the event City elects to complete or arrange for completion of the remaining work and improvements, City may require all work by Developer or its surety to cease in order to allow adequate coordination by City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if conditions precedent for reversion to acreage can be met and if the interests of City will not be prejudiced thereby, City may also process a reversion to acreage and thereafter recover from Developer or its surety the full cost and expense incurred.

18.3 Other Remedies. No action by City pursuant to Section 18.0 et seq. of this Agreement shall prohibit City from exercising any other right or pursuing any other legal or equitable remedy available under this Agreement or any federal, state, or local law. City may exercise it rights and remedies independently or cumulatively, and City may pursue inconsistent remedies. City may institute an action for damages, injunctive relief, or specific performance.

19. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

19.1 Authority to Enter Agreement. Each of the signatories hereto represents and warrants that he or she is competent and authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom he or she purports to sign. Each Party hereto agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other Parties hereto against all claims, suits, actions, and demands, including necessary expenses of investigation and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of claims that its signatory was not competent or so authorized to sign this Agreement.

19.2 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate, or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

19.3 Construction; References; Captions. It being agreed the Parties or their agents have participated in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days, or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work 524
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 14 -
days. All references to Developer include all personnel, employees, agents, and subcontractors of Developer, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.

19.4 Notices. All notices, demands, invoices, and written communications shall be in writing and delivered to the following addresses or such other addresses as the Parties may designate by written notice:

CITY:

City of Wildomar
Attn: City Manager
23873 Clinton Keith Rd., Suite 111
Wildomar, CA 92595
DEVELOPER:

D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc.

Attn: Dean James Pernicone
2280 Wardlow Circle, Suite 100
Corona, CA 92878
Depending upon the method of transmittal, notice shall be deemed received as follows: by facsimile, as of the date and time sent provided the original is contemporaneously deposited with United States Postal Service and delivered by regular mail; by messenger, as of the date delivered; and by U.S. Mail first class postage prepaid, as of 72 hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail.

19.5 Amendment; Modification. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Developer and by the City.

The City’s City Manager may, but is not required to, make minor amendments not affecting substantive terms without further authorization from the City Council. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute any such amendments as required by this Agreement or that do not otherwise reduce City’s rights under this Agreement. Waiver. City’s failure to insist upon strict compliance with any provision of this Agreement or to exercise any right or privilege provided herein, or City’s waiver of any breach of this Agreement, shall not relieve Developer of any of its obligations under this Agreement, whether of the same or similar type. The foregoing shall be true whether City’s actions are intentional or unintentional. Developer agrees to waive, as a defense, counterclaim or set off, any and all defects, irregularities or deficiencies in the authorization, execution or performance of the Public Improvements or this Agreement, as well as the laws, rules, regulations, ordinances or resolutions of City with regards to the authorization, execution or performance of the Public Improvements or this Agreement.

19.6 Assignment or Transfer of Agreement. Developer shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without prior written consent of City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignee, hypothecate, or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted 525
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 15 -
assignment, hypothecation, or transfer. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in City’s written consent, any assignment, hypothecation, or transfer shall not release or discharge Developer from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement.

19.7 Binding Effect. Each and all of the covenants and conditions shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties, and their successors, heirs, personal representatives, or assigns. This section shall not be construed as an authorization for any Party to assign any right or obligation.

19.8 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

19.9 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

19.10 Consent to Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. Any legal action or proceeding brought to interpret or enforce this Agreement, or which in any way arises out of the Parties’ activities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement, shall be filed and prosecuted in the appropriate California State Court in the County of Riverside, California. Each Party waives the benefit of any provision of state or federal law providing for a change of venue to any other court or jurisdiction including, without limitation, a change of venue based on the fact that a governmental entity is a party to the action or proceeding, or that a federal right or question is involved or alleged to be involved in the action or proceeding. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing waiver, Developer expressly waives any right to have venue transferred pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 394.

19.11 Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. If any arbitration, lawsuit, or other legal action or proceeding is brought by one Party against the other Party in connection with this Agreement or the Property, the prevailing party, whether by final judgment or arbitration award, shall be entitled to and recover from the other party all Litigation Expenses. Any judgment, order, or award entered in such legal action or proceeding shall contain a specific provision providing for the recovery of Litigation Expenses.

19.12 Relationship Between The Parties. The Parties hereby mutually agree that neither this Agreement, any map related to Tract No. 31896, nor any other related entitlement, permit, or approval issued by City for the Property shall operate to create the relationship of partnership, joint venture, or agency between City and Developer. Developer’s contractors and subcontractors are exclusively and solely under the control and dominion of Developer. Nothing herein shall be deemed to make Developer or its contractors an agent or contractor of City.

19.13 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterpart originals, which taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.

19.14 Effective Date of Agreement. This Agreement shall not become effective until the date it has been formally approved by the City and executed by the appropriate authorities of City and Developer.
526
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
- 16 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.

CITY OF WILDOMAR
___________________________
Daniel A. York
City Manager
ATTEST:
___________________________
Janet Morales
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
_______________________________
Thomas D. Jex
City Attorney
___________________________________
By: By:
_________________________________
Its: ______________________________ Its: ___________________________ NOTE: DEVELOPER’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE

ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS,

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO DEVELOPER’S BUSINESS ENTITY.
527
1 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
TRACT NO. 31896
IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 31896, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 2, 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP 8828, AS FILED IN BOOK 43, PAGE 99 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH PORTION OF BLOCK “M” AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 174 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN SECTIONS 1 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
528
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
1 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT “B”

LIST OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
TRACT NO. 31896
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
WO#
WATER/RW IMPROVEMENTS Date Prepared:

QUANTITY UNIT ITEM UNIT COST
LF 4" PVC Water Main $ 41.00 $ -
LF 6" PVC Water Main 45.00 -
LF 8" PVC Water Main 50.00 -
LF 12" PVC Water Main 65.00 -
LF 16" DIP Water Main 150.00 -
LF 18" DIP Water Main 180.00 -
LF 20" DIP Water Main 200.00 -
EA 4" RW Gate Valve 1,800.00 -
EA 6" RW Gate Valve 2,000.00 -
EA 8" RW Gate Valve 2,200.00 -
EA 12" Gate Valve 3,000.00 -
EA 16" Butterfly Valve 5,500.00 -
EA 18" Butterfly Valve 6,500.00 -
EA 20" Butterfly Valve 7,000.00 -
EA 24" Butterfly Valve 8,500.00 -
EA Fire Hydrant (6") Super 6,500.00 -
EA Fire Hydrant (6") Standard 5,500.00 -
EA Adjust Water Valve to Grade 350.00 -
EA Relocation of Blowoff 4,500.00 -
EA 1" Water Service 1,100.00 -
EA 1.5" Water Service 1,600.00 -
EA 2" Water Service 3,000.00 -
EA 3" Water Service 4,500.00 -
EA 1" Air/Vac Assembly 2,500.00 -
EA 2" Air/Vac Assembly 4,000.00 -
EA 4" Air/Vac Assembly 6,000.00 -
EA 2" Blowoff 5,000.00 -
EA 6" Blowoff 6,000.00 -
IN/LF Steel Casing 20.00 -
EA 1" Sample Point 2,000.00 -
LS Traffic Control N/A -
EA 8" Fittings 250.00 -
EA 16" Fitting 750.00 -
EA 8" DCDA 7,000.00 -
EA 10" DCDA 10,000.00 -
LF AC Pavement Trench Repair 10.00 -
EA Cut in 12" Tee 10,000.00 -
EA Join 16" 2,000.00 -
-
Subtotal -
20% Contingency -
Total $ -
Project:

1. Unit prices for steel or ductile iron pipeline shall be 35% greater than PVC in size 4-16 inch diameters and 20% greater than PVC in sizes 18-24 inch diameters. PVC will not be considered in sizes above 24-inch.

2. Unit prices are for average depth and normal soil conditions. Unit prices shall increase where rocky soils, excavation through rock formations or extra depth occur.

AMOUNT

CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

FOR WATER IMPROVEMENTS
Prepared by:

F\Engin\Forms\Plan Check\Construction Cost Estimate
Water-RW
Updated 3/26/2013
12" DIP 25,620
551
WO#
SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Date Prepared:

QUANTITY UNIT ITEM UNIT COST
LF 4" Sewer Lateral $ 25.00 $ -
LF 6" Sewer Main 30.00 -
LF 8" Sewer Main 35.00 -
LF 10" Sewer Main 45.00 -
LF 12" Sewer Main 50.00 -
LF 15" Sewer Main 70.00 -
LF 18" Sewer Main 85.00 -
LF 21" Sewer Main 90.00 -
LF 24" Sewer Main 120.00 -
LF 6" PVC Sewer Force Main 80.00 -
LF 8" PVC Sewer Force Main 120.00 -
LF 12" PVC Sewer Force Main 140.00 -
EA 4' Manhole 3,500.00 -
EA 5' Manhole 5,000.00 -
EA 6' Manhole 7,000.00 -
IN/LF Steel Casing 20.00 -
SF Pavement Removal and Replacement 10.00
LS Traffic Control N/A
Subtotal -
20% Contingency -
Total $ -
Project:

2. Unit prices are for average depth and normal soil conditions. Unit prices shall increase where rocky soils, excavation through rock formations or extra depth occur.

AMOUNT

3. DIP force main price shall be 30% higher than PVC force mains.

CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

FOR SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Prepared by:

F\Engin\Forms\Plan Check\Construction Cost Estimate-Sewer Updated 3/26/2013 EA 8" Sewer Plug
16"
EA Remove Plug and Join 250 EA Backflow Preventor 500 250.00 552
PRE AND POST METER WO#
RECYCLED WATER COST Date Prepared:

QUANTITY UNIT ITEM UNIT COST AMOUNT
EA 3/4" Reclaimed Water Meter $ 1,387.00 $ -
EA 1" Reclaimed Water Meter $ 2,044.00 $ -
EA 1-1/2" Turb Reclaimed Water Meter $ 4,086.00 $ -
EA 2" Turb Reclaimed Water Meter $ 5,776.50 $ -
EA 3" Turb Reclaimed Water Meter $ 10,011.00 $ -
EA 4" Turb Reclaimed Water Meter $ 16,452.50 $ -
EA 1" Water Service 1,100.00 $ -
EA 3/4" Water Service 825.00 $ -
EA 2" Water Service 3,000.00 $ -
EA Pressure Reducing Station(without bypass) $ 35,000.00 $ - LF 4" PVC Water Main $ 41.00 $ -
LF 6" PVC Water Main 45.00 $ -
LF 8" PVC Water Main 50.00 $ -
LF 12" PVC Water Main 65.00 $ -
LF 16" DIP Water Main 150.00 $ -
LF 18" DIP Water Main 180.00 $ -
LF 20" DIP Water Main 200.00 $ -
EA 4" RW Gate Valve 1,800.00 $ -
EA 6" RW Gate Valve 2,000.00 $ -
EA 8" RW Gate Valve 2,200.00 $ -
EA 12" Butterfly Valve 3,000.00 $ -
EA 16" Butterfly Valve 5,500.00 $ -
EA 18" Butterfly Valve 6,500.00 $ -
EA 20" Butterfly Valve 7,000.00 $ -
EA 24" Butterfly Valve 8,500.00 $ -
EA Adjust Water Valve to Grade 350.00 $ -
EA Relocation of Blowoff 4,500.00 $ -
EA 1" Air/Vac Assembly 2,500.00 $ -
EA 2" Air/Vac Assembly 4,000.00 $ -
EA 4" Air/Vac Assembly 6,000.00 $ -
EA 4" Blowoff 5,000.00 $ -
EA 6" Blowoff 6,000.00 $ -
IN/LF Steel Casing 20.00 $ -
EA 1" Sample Point 2,000.00 $ -
LS Traffic Control N/A $ -
EA 8" Hot Tap 8,000.00 $ -
EA 12" Hot Tap 10,000.00 $ -
EA 16" Hot Tap 12,000.00 $ -
Pre-Meter Sub-Total -
Pre-Meter with 20% Contigency Total -
Post Meter Items (ie, Emitters, Spray Heads, Valves…..) LS Misc. Recycled Water Items 1.00 $ -
Post-Meter Sub-Total -
PRVW-Meter with 20% Contigency Total -
Total $ -
Project:

CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

FOR WATER IMPROVEMENTS
Prepared by:

Pre-Meter Items
553
WO#
WATER/RW IMPROVEMENTS Date Prepared:

2. Unit prices are for average depth and normal soil conditions. Unit prices shall increase where rocky soils, excavation through rock formations or extra depth occur.

AMOUNT

CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

FOR WATER IMPROVEMENTS
Prepared by:

F\Engin\Forms\Plan Check\Construction Cost Estimate
Water-RW
Updated 3/26/2013
3,680
12" DIP 130.00 845,952
554
WO#
SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Date Prepared:

QUANTITY UNIT ITEM UNIT COST
LF 4" Sewer Lateral $ 25.00 $ -
LF 6" Sewer Main 30.00 -
LF 8" Sewer Main 35.00 -
LF 10" Sewer Main 45.00 -
LF 12" Sewer Main 50.00 -
LF 15" Sewer Main 65.00 -
LF 18" Sewer Main 85.00 -
LF 21" Sewer Main 90.00 -
LF 24" Sewer Main 120.00 -
LF 6" PVC Sewer Force Main 80.00 -
LF 8" PVC Sewer Force Main 120.00 -
LF 12" PVC Sewer Force Main 140.00 -
EA 4' Manhole 3,500.00 -
EA 5' Manhole 5,000.00 -
EA 6' Manhole 7,000.00 -
IN/LF Steel Casing 20.00 -
SF Pavement Removal and Replacement N/A
LS Traffic Control N/A
Subtotal -
20% Contingency -
Total $ -
Project:

2. Unit prices are for average depth and normal soil conditions. Unit prices shall increase where rocky soils, excavation through rock formations or extra depth occur.

AMOUNT

3. DIP force main price shall be 30% higher than PVC force mains.

CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

FOR SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Prepared by:

F\Engin\Forms\Plan Check\Construction Cost Estimate-Sewer Updated 3/26/2013 1 EA 8" Sewer Plug
16"
EA Remove Plug and Join 250 EA Backflow Preventor 500 250.00 250.00 555
PRE AND POST METER WO#
RECYCLED WATER COST Date Prepared:

CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

FOR WATER IMPROVEMENTS
Prepared by:

Pre-Meter Items
556
JASON E. UHLEY
General Manager-Chief Engineer
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
951.955.1200
FAX 95 l.788.9965
www.rcflood.org
248633

RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL

AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Mr. Daniel A. York
City Engineer/Manager
City of Wildomar
23873 Clinton Ke ith Road, Suite 20 I
Wildomar, CA 92595
Dear Mr. York:

January 26, 2023
Re: Tract No. 3 1896
Storm Drain Bonding Estimate
Account No. 137-0-3-90328
Please find be low a detailed construction cost estimate of the drainage facilities associated with the abovereferenced project for which the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservati on District (District) assumes inspection and ma intenance responsibility. The estimated cost of these fac ilities is $3 ,901 ,852 and shall be the basis upon which the District shall collect fi e ld in spection fees per the provisions of Section 17. 1 of Subdivision Ordinance 460 and Fee Ordinance 671.6.

Items Unit Quantitv Unit Cost Cost
Concrete Grouted Riprap Drivable Surface CY 1,402 $260 $364,520 Decomposed Granite Access Road SF 34,409 $0.77 $26,495
Misc. Riprap (Slope Bank, Launchin g Toe, Energy Dissipator) CY 16,929 $ 143 $2,420,847 Junction Structure No. 8 EA 4 $ 15,600 $62,400
Access Road Fencing (Cable Ra ilin g) LF 1,750 $48.75 $85,313 26' Wide Access Ramp Pipe Gate EA 4 $2,500 $ I 0,000
24" RCP Storm Drain LF 37 $224 $8,288
30" RCP Storm Drain LF 59 $266 $ 15,694
42" RCP Storm Drain LF 2 10 $353 $74, 130
48" RCP Storm Dra in LF 296 $386 $ 11 4,256
Manhole No. I EA 3 $9, 100 $27,300
Manhole No. 2 EA 3 $9,100 $27,300
Removab le Bol lards EA IO $ 1,500 $15 ,000
Subtotal $3 ,25 1,543
20% Contingency $650,309
Total Cost $3 ,90 1,852
Inspection Fee = 3% of Total Cost $ 11 7,056
Total Fees Due $ 11 7,056
Very truly yours,
BJ1
A, P.E.

Senior Civil Engineer
557
Mr. Danie l A. York
Re: Tract No. 3 I 896
Storm Drain Bonding Estimate
Account No. 13 7-0-3-90328
ec: MOS Consulting
Attn: Ed Lenth
D.R. Horton
Attn: Dean Pemicone
CYaldo Corporation
Attn : Gary Yagade
Ann Ro lle
Darrylenn Prudho lme-Brockington
Darren James
-2-
Note: A copy of this letter should be submitted with the payment of inspection fee .

RA:blm
248633
January 26, 2023
558
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
1 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT “C”

SURETY BONDS AND OTHER SECURITY
TRACT NO. 31896
As evidence of understanding the provisions contained in this Agreement, and of the Developer’s intent to comply with same, the Developer has submitted the below described security in the amounts required by this Agreement, and has affixed the appropriate signatures thereto:

PERFORMANCE BOND PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: $ 11,035,114.00
Surety:

Attorney-in-fact:

Address:

MATERIAL AND LABOR BOND PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: $ 5,517,557.00 Surety:

Attorney-in-fact:

Address:

CASH MONUMENT SECURITY: $ 47,500.00
Amount deposited per Cash Receipt No. Date:

MONUMENT BOND PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: $ 100,000.00
Surety:

Attorney-in-fact:

Address:
559
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
1 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
BOND NO. ___________________
INITIAL PREMIUM: ___________________

SUBJECT TO RENEWAL

CITY OF WILDOMAR
TRACT MAP NO. 31896 IMPROVEMENTS

FORM OF PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS the City of Wildomar, California (“City”) and D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc. (“Principal”), have executed an agreement for work consisting of, but not limited to, the furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidentals for all grading, roads, paving, curbs and gutters, pathways, storm drains, sanitary sewers, utilities, drainage facilities, traffic controls, landscaping, street lights, and all other required facilities for Tract Map No. 31896 (“Public Improvements”);
WHEREAS, the Public Improvements to be performed by Principal are more particularly set forth in that certain Subdivision Improvement Agreement dated October 11, 2023 (“Improvement Agreement”);
WHEREAS, the Improvement Agreement is hereby referred to and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, Principal is required by the Improvement Agreement to provide a good and sufficient bond for performance of the Improvement Agreement, and to guarantee and warranty the Public Improvements constructed thereunder.

NOW, THEREFORE, Principal and _________________________________ (“Surety”), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of __________, and duly authorized to transact surety business under the laws of the State of California, are held and firmly bound unto City in the sum of Eleven Million Thirty Five Thousand One Hundred Fourteen and No/100 Dollars ($11,035,114.00), said sum being not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the total cost of the Public Improvements as set forth in the Improvement Agreement, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such, that if Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions, agreements, guarantees, and warranties in the Improvement Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified and in all respects according to their intent and meaning, and to indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, employees, and agents, as stipulated in the Improvement Agreement, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. 560
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
2 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
As part of the obligation secured hereby, and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney’s fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.

Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Improvement Agreement, or to any plans, profiles, and specifications related thereto, or to the Public Improvements to be constructed thereunder, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition.

This bond is executed and filed to comply with Section 66499 et seq. of the Government Code of California as security for performance of the Improvement Agreement and security for the one-year guarantee and warranty of the Public Improvements.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the seal and signature of the Principal is hereto affixed, and the corporate seal and the name of the Surety is hereto affixed and attested by its duly authorized Attorney-in-Fact at _______________________, this _____ day of _______________, ______.

Principal Surety
By: By:

Its: Managing Member Attorney-In-Fact
(print name) (print name)
NOTE: APPROPRIATE NOTARIAL ACKNOWLEDGMENTS OF EXECUTION

BY PRINCIPAL AND SURETY, AND A COPY OF THE POWER OF

ATTORNEY TO LOCAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE BONDING
COMPANY MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS BOND.
561
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
1 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
BOND NO. ___________________
INITIAL PREMIUM: ___________________

SUBJECT TO RENEWAL

CITY OF WILDOMAR
TRACT MAP 31896 IMPROVEMENTS

FORM OF LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS the City of Wildomar California (“City”) and D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc. (“Principal”), have executed an agreement for work consisting of, but not limited to, the furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidentals for all grading, roads, paving, curbs and gutters, pathways, storm drains, sanitary sewers, utilities, drainage facilities, traffic controls, landscaping, street lights, and all other required facilities for Tract Map No. 31896 (“Public Improvements”);
WHEREAS, the Public Improvements to be performed by Principal are more particularly set forth in that certain Subdivision Improvement Agreement dated October 11, 2023 (“Improvement Agreement”);
WHEREAS, the Improvement Agreement is hereby referred to and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, Principal is required to furnish a bond in connection with the Improvement Agreement providing that if Principal or any of its subcontractors shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, or other supplies, or terms used in, upon, for, or about the performance of the Public Improvements, or for any work or labor done thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the provisions of Title 1 (commencing with section 8000) through Title 3 (commencing with section 9000) of Part 6 of Division 4 of the California Civil Code, with respect to such work or labor, that the Surety on this bond will pay the same together with a reasonable attorney’s fee in case suit is brought on the bond.

NOW, THEREFORE, Principal and _________________________ (“Surety”), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of _________________, and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, are held and firmly bound unto City and to any and all material men, persons, companies or corporations furnishing materials, provisions, and other supplies used in, upon, for or about the performance of the Public Improvements, and all persons, companies or corporations renting or hiring teams, or implements or machinery, for or contributing to the Public Improvements to be done, and all persons performing work or labor upon the same and all persons supplying both work and materials as aforesaid excepting the Principal, the sum of Five Million Five Hundred Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Fifty-Seven and No/100 Dollars ($5,517,557.00), said sum being not less than 50% of the total cost of the Public Improvements under the terms of the Improvement Agreement, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
562
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
2 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH that if the Principal, his or its subcontractors, heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, or other supplies or machinery used in, upon, for or about the performance of the Public Improvements, or for work or labor thereon of any kind, or fail to pay any of the persons named in California Civil Code Section 9100, or amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed by any such claimant, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of the contractor and his subcontractors pursuant to Section 13020 of the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to such work and labor, and all other applicable laws of the State of California and rules and regulations of its agencies, then said Surety will pay the same in or to an amount not exceeding the sum specified herein.

As part of the obligation secured hereby, and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney’s fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.

This bond is executed and filed to comply with Section 66499 et seq. of the California Government Code as security for payment to contractors, subcontractors, and persons furnishing labor, materials, or equipment for construction of the Public Improvements or performance of the Improvement Agreement. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 1 (commencing with Section 8000) through Title 3 (commencing with Section 9000) of Part 6 of Division 4 of the California Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.

Principal Surety
By: By:

Its: Managing Member Attorney-In-Fact
(print name) (print name)
563
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
3 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
NOTE: APPROPRIATE NOTARIAL ACKNOWLEDGMENTS OF EXECUTION

BY PRINCIPAL AND SURETY, AND A COPY OF THE POWER OF

ATTORNEY TO LOCAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE BONDING
COMPANY MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS BOND.
564
RIV #4833-9648-5472 v2
1 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT “D”

LIST OF TRACT MAP CONDITIONS

OF APPROVAL NOT SATISFIED
Condition No. Condition Language Notes
565
Conditon No. Condition Language Notes

50.Flood.RI4 Offsite drainage facilities shall be located within dedicated drainage easements obtained from the affected property owner(s). Document(s) shall be recorded and a copy submitted to the District prior to recordation of the final map. If the developer cannot obtain such rights, the map should be redesigned to eliminate the need for the easement.

Agreement is in
process

50.Planning.8 The land divider shall submit to the County Planning Department - Development Review Division a duly and completely executed agreement with County Service Area No. 152A which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the County that the land divider has provided for the payment of parks and recreation fees and/or dedication of land for the TENTATIVE MAP in accordance with the Section 10.35 of County Ordinance No. 460.

Defer to building
permits

50.Planning.33 The land divider shall (a) notify the Planning Department that the following documents shall be shortly, or have been, submitted to the office of the County Counsel for the review and approval of that office, and (b) the land divider shall submit to the office of the County counsel the following documents:

CC&R's are
currently in process.

Final Map can not be
recorded until the
CC&R's are
approved and ready
for recordation.

1. A cover letter identifying the project for which approval is sought referencing the Planning Department case number(s) (a copy of this cover letter may be sent to the Planning Department to serve as notification) and identifying one individual to represent the land divider if there are any questions concerning the review of the submitted documents; and

2. One (1) copy AND one (1) original, wet signed, notarized and ready for recordation declaration of covernants, conditions, and restrictions; attached to these documents there shall be included a legal description of the property included within the covenants, conditions and restrictions and a scaled map or diagram of such boundaries, both signed and stamped by a California registered civil engineer or licensed land surveryor; and

3. A sample document converying title to the purchaser of an indvidual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference; and,

4. A deposit equaling three (3) hours of the current hourly fee for the Review of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions established pursuant to County Ordinance No. 671 at the time the above referenced documents are submitted to the Office of the County Counsel for review and approval.

Not satisfied 566
The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for review shall a) providefor a minimum term of 60 years, b) provide for the establishment of a property owner's association comprised of the owners of each individual lot or unit as tenants in common, c) provide for the ownership of the common area by either the property owners association or the owners of each individual lot or unhit as tenants in common, and d) contain the following provisions verbatim:
"Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the following provisions shall apply:

The property owners' association established herein shall manage and continuously maintain the "Open Space Area" more particularly described on the "TENTATIVE MAP", attached hereto, and shall not sell or transfer the 'common area' or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning Department of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest.

The property owner's association shall have the right to access the owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of maintaining such 'common area', and shall have the right to lien the property of any such owner who defaults in the payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be prior to all other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of assessment or other document creating the assessment lien.

This Declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended, or property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successorin-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial' if it affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the 'common area' established pursuant to the Declaration.

In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws, or the property owners' association Rules and Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control." Once approved, the copy and the original declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be forwarded by the Office of the County Counsel to the Planning Department. The Planning Department will retain the one copy for the case file, and forward the wet signed and notarized original declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions to the County Transportation Department - Survey Division - shall record the original declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions in conjunction with the recordation of the final map. 567

50.TRANS.34 Prior to the recordation of the final map, or any phase thereof, the project proponent shall pay the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) in accordance with the fee schedule in effect at the time of recordation, pursuant to Board Policy (dated May 25, 2004) and Ordinance No. 824.

TUMF is collected at
the time of Building
Permits and is
verified by the City
prior to permit
issuance.
568

CITY OF WILDOMAR

CC - REGULAR MEETING

CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.14
Meeting Date: October 11, 2023
SUBJECT: Eighth Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Transportation Group for the Bundy Canyon Road Project
SUBMITTED BY: Jason Farag
PREPARED BY: Jason Farag
ACTION:

Authorize the City Manager to execute the Eighth Amendment to the Design Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. for Engineering Services for the Bundy Canyon Road Improvement Project.

SUMMARY:

The City previously entered into a contract with Parsons Transportation Group (Parsons) to provide design and construction engineering support services for the Bundy Canyon Road Improvement Project (Project). Services under this contract are still on-going and a contract amendment is now required to extend the term of the contract, to complete the remaining work.

BACKGROUND:

The City and Parsons entered into a Professional Services Agreement (Agreement) on September 10, 2014 to prepare construction and environmental documents for the Improvement of Bundy Canyon Road from Cherry Street to the eastern City limits (Project).

Previous amendments to the Agreement have been approved by the City Council to provide required additional services necessary to construct Segment 1 of the Project from Cherry Street to 1200 feet east of Oak Canyon Drive, to prepare plan revisions and updates to accommodate an SB 821 Grant to provide sidewalk and bike lanes, and to provide some design and environmental services for Segment 2 of the Project from Oak Canyon Drive to The Farm Road. The original contract amount and subsequent amendments resulted in a total contract amount of $1,521,790.03.

DISCUSSION:

Services included under the original Agreement and subsequent amendments are still on569 going. Specifically, final Construction Management Services for Segment 1 of the Project and utility coordination and environmental services for Segment 2 of the Project are still in progress. The term of the Agreement was last amended in Amendment No. 4 to June 30, 2023.

In order to ensure the completion of services provided for under the Agreement and subsequent Amendments, staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Eighth Amendment with Parsons to extend the term of the contract through June 30, 2024. Approval of this amendment would be retroactive in its effective date back to June 30, 2023. At this time, required services under the contract are expected to be complete by or before June 30, 2024. There are no other changes to the contract and no changes to the compensation under the contract.

A copy of the Eighth Amendment is included as Attachment A.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Eighth Amendment only extends the term of the contract and does not change the compensation under the contract. Services included under the contract are covered by the approved FY 2023-2024 budget, and no additional funds are needed at this time. There is no fiscal impact to the City.

ATTACHMENTS:

A - Eighth Contract Amendment
570

EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO

DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREMENT FOR

ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE BUNDY CANYON

ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
by and between
the

CITY OF WILDOMAR
and
PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP INC.

Dated October 11, 2023
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98BD7A9A-859D-4FE7-8D33-3EC8F25C7F04 154471
-2-

EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR

THE BUNDY CANYON ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
This Eighth Amendment to Agreement for Design Professional Services (“Eighth Amendment”), which is dated for reference as indicated on the cover page, is hereby entered into by and between the CITY OF WILDOMAR, a California general law city (“City”), and PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC., a State of Illinois Corporation (“Service Provider”), as follows:

RECITALS
A. City and Service Provider entered in an agreement for Design Professional services on September 10, 2014 (“Agreement”). The Agreement provides that Service Provider will perform engineering services.

B. City and Design Professional approved a First Amendment to Agreement for additional Design Professional Services on October 12, 2016.

C. City and Design Professional approved a Second Amendment to Agreement for additional Design Professional Services on September 19, 2018.

D. City and Design Professional approved a Third Amendment to Agreement for additional Design Professional Services on September 11, 2019.

E. City and Design Professional approved a Fourth Amendment to Agreement for additional Design Professional Services on October 28, 2021.

F. City and Design Professional approved a Fifth Amendment to Agreement for additional Design Professional Services on July 13, 2022.

G. City and Design Professional approved a Sixth Amendment to Agreement for additional Design Professional Services on October 12, 2022.

H. City and Design Professional approved a Seventh Amendment to Agreement for additional Design Professional Services on June 14, 2023.

H. Section 1 of the Agreement provides for the Term of the Agreement.

I. This Eighth Amendment amends Section 1 to increase the term of the Agreement through June 30, 2024.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises made and recited herein, the parties do hereby enter into this Eighth Amendment which modifies and amends the Agreement as follows:

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98BD7A9A-859D-4FE7-8D33-3EC8F25C7F04 154572
-3-

1. AMENDMENT. Section 1, Term of Agreement, of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

Subject to the provisions of Section 20 ‘Termination of Agreement’ of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement commences on September 10, 2014, and shall terminate on June 30, 2024.

2. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

2.1 Remainder Unchanged. Except as specifically modified and amended in this Eighth Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect and binding upon the parties.

2.2 Integration. This Eighth Amendment constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with respect to all or any part of the transaction discussed in this Eighth Amendment.

2.3 Effective Date. This Eighth Amendment shall not become effective until the date it has been formally approved by the City Council and executed by the appropriate authorities of the City and Service Provider.

2.4 Applicable Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Eighth Amendment.

2.5 References. All references to the Agreement include all their respective terms and provisions. All defined terms utilized in this Eighth Amendment have the same meaning as provided in the Agreement, unless expressly stated to the contrary in this Eighth Amendment.
[Signatures on following page]
[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank]
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98BD7A9A-859D-4FE7-8D33-3EC8F25C7F04 154673
-4-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Eighth Amendment to the Agreement on the date and year first written above.

CITY

CITY OF WILDOMAR
By:_________________________________
Dan York, City Manager
ATTEST:
______________________________
Janet Morales, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
______
Thomas D. Jex, City Attorney

SERVICE PROVIDER
PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.

By:__________________________________
Name: Chris A. Johnson
Title: Vice President
By:__________________________________
Name: Paul Walker-Lanz
Title: Vice President, Treasurer
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98BD7A9A-859D-4FE7-8D33-3EC8F25C7F04 154774

CITY OF WILDOMAR

CC - REGULAR MEETING

CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.15
Meeting Date: October 11, 2023
SUBJECT: 27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) - IS/MND
SUBMITTED BY: Jason Farag
PREPARED BY: Jason Farag
ACTION:

1. Adopt a Resolution entitled:

RESOLUTION NO. 2023 - ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (SCH NO. 2023080213), AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP) FOR THE 27-ACRE

PARK PROJECT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LA ESTRELLA STREET AND SUSAN DRIVE (APN: 376-350-009 AND 376-350-017).

2. Approve an amendment to the agreement with RRM Design Group for the completion of the design of Phase 1 of the 27-Acre Park Project with RRM Design Group.

SUMMARY:

The 27-Acre Park is a proposed City park located northeast of La Estrella Street and Wildomar Trail. The Park is included in the City's Parks Master Plan. The City is currently preparing design plans and is seeking grant funding for the construction of Phase 1 of the Park. To prepare the Park for construction, the City prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Park, in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Adoption of the IS/MND is necessary for the City to construct the Park. The City also needs to extend the term of an existing agreement for design services, to allow for the completion of the design plans for Phase 1 of the Park.

BACKGROUND:

The City's Park Master Plans identifies a proposed 27-Acre Park (Park) located at the northeast corner of La Estrella Street and Wildomar Trail. The planned Park includes various proposed amenities including bike trails and courses, a splash pad, volleyball court, 575
adventure/nature play areas, a demonstration garden, a community green, a picnic pavilion, a potential community building, an outdoor amphitheater, an outdoor fitness plaza or fitness stations, educational signage, shade structures/sails, trails, and a hill-top play area. The Initial Park concepts also considered a potential future fire station on the site. Improvements associated with the park include parking lots, utilities, stormwater improvements, and street improvements.

The total construction cost for the Park exceeds available funding. In order to open the Park for public use, the City phased the Park so that it could be constructed and opened for public use as funding becomes available. Phase 1 of the Park includes some of the proposed amenities including parking lots, bike trails and courses, trails, and the hill-top play area.

Phase 1 of the Park will complete initial grading of the site and complete initial utility improvements, initial stormwater improvements, and initial street improvements.

In 2017, the City of Wildomar entered into a contract with RRM Design Group (RRM) for Landscape Architecture services related to the City’s Parks Master Plan, including the 27-Acre Park (Agreement). Subsequent contract amendments were approved to include design services for Phase 1 of the 27-Acre Park.

The City has begun seeking funding for the construction of the Park and earlier this year, the City applied for grant funding to the State's Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS) Land and Water Conservation Grant Program (LWCF) for the construction of Phase 1. The City is still awaiting the results of this application.

In order to be ready for construction, the City has prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Park, in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

DISCUSSION:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The Public Works Department is requesting City Council to approve the environmental analysis to allow development of the 27-Acre Park (Project) and to approve an amendment to the Agreement with RRM Design Group, to extend the term of the contract for design services for the Project. The proposed Project consists of the following for review and consideration by the City Council:

1. Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) - The proposed Project requires the preparation, review and adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (SCH No. 2023080213) in accordance with Section 15070 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

2. Agreement Amendment - Approval of an amendment to the Agreement with RRM Design Group to extend the term of the contract to continue and complete the design of Phase 1 of the 27-Acre Park.
576

PROJECT ANALYSIS
CEQA Analysis and Determination
The Community Development Director in a preliminary review of the proposed project determined that there was substantial evidence that the proposed 27-Acre Park project may have one or more significant effects on the environment. Therefore, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code §§ 21000 – 21189.3, and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 CCR §§ 15000-15387, the proposed project required the preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), included as Exhibit 1 to Attachment A of this staff report. Based on the CEQA analysis, all potential environmental impacts created by the project have been mitigated to a level of non-significance, and each of the 18 mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project’s MMRP. (Exhibit 4 to Attachment A)
Upon completion of the draft IS/MND and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15072, the Community Development Department on August 10, 2023 provided a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the State Clearinghouse, Riverside County Clerk, Press Enterprise, a local newspaper of general circulation, and the City’s local distribution list regarding the preparation and public review of the draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Project. Also, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15073 and §15105, and the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines, the draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated and made available to the State Clearinghouse/OPR, the City’s local distribution list, and other interested parties requesting a copy for a 30-day public review/comment period that commenced on August 10, 2023 and concluded on September 8, 2023. In addition, the draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was uploaded to the City’s Environmental Documents Center webpage during the same 30-day public review period.

During the 30-day public review period, the City received one public comment on the draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Therefore, the Community Development Department prepared a Response to Comments document. In accordance with CEQA Guideline Section 15097, the Community Development Department has also prepared a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) to monitor compliance with the proposed mitigation measures. The MMRP outlines the proposed mitigation measures for the project and the timing and department responsibility for implementing the mitigation measures.

The mitigation measures will also be included into the Technical Specifications for the Project, when it is advertised for construction. A copy of the IS/MND/RTC/MMRP package is provided for City Council consideration in Attachment A, Exhibits 1 – 4.

AB 52 Tribal Consultation Compliance
AB 52 requires early consultation in the CEQA process to ensure that local and Tribal governments, public agencies, and project proponents have information available, early in the CEQA environmental review process, for the purpose of 577
identifying and addressing potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources.

The City has complied with notification requirements and has initiated consultation as required under AB 52 with both the Soboba and Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. Staff met with both tribes, and a series of standard mitigation measures intended to protect tribal cultural resources were agreed to. These have been placed into the IS/MND mitigation measures (MMRP).

Staff is recommending City Council adoption of the IS/MND/MMRP. The findings for the staff’s recommendation are provided in the IS/MND Resolution (Attachment A).

Site Plan Analysis
The proposed project will be developed in accordance with Section 17.16 of the WMC (R-R Rural Residential Zone), which allows public parks with the approval of a site plan and restricts building heights of non-residential structures to 50 feet. The proposed project will comply with the onsite and offsite development and design standards listed in the City’s Parks Master Plan. Landscaping and lighting will be approved by the City to ensure they meet the City’s requirements prior to installation. Based on the City’s review of the proposed project plans, the proposed project meets the City’s parks and R-R development standards.

Site Plan Layout
The proposed 27-Acre Park has been designed to preserve the natural topography to the extent possible, including preservation of natural drainage courses throughout the project site. Access to the project site would be provided via six entrances/exits: two along Wildomar Trail, one along La Estrella Street, and three along Susan Drive. Emergency access to the site would be provided via the southern driveway on La Estrella Street. A connection to Ronald Reagan Elementary School with concrete steps and an accessible ramp would be developed on the north side of the school. The proposed project would include a total of 221 parking spaces as follows: 39 spaces in the northwestern parking lot, 33 spaces in the southwestern parking lot, 125 spaces in the southern parking lot, and 24 spaces in the eastern parking lot. The proposed project would include electric vehicle (EV) spaces, and ADA-accessible parking spaces. The project site would also include bicycle racks adjacent to the fire station (potential future use) and the community center. Refer to Attachment B for the Conceptual Design Plans Package.

The proposed project is subject to the development standards listed in the City’s Parks Master Plan. Chapter 3, Parks Standards, of this Plan identifies standards for park facilities, including park amenities (e.g., benches, play equipment, and sports fields), and minimum number and design standards for the size, layout, and orientation of each park amenity. The proposed project is categorized as a 578
community park (15-40 acres), which is the City’s largest park type. Table 3.A, Park Facility Standards, lists specific parks standards for park size, service area, location, desired characteristics, amenities, access, safety, and sustainable stormwater management. Table 3.B, Quantity of Park Amenities by Park Type, of the Plan identifies specific design standards for amenities in parks, including design specifications for paths; number of benches, tables, shade structures, sports fields; and size of play areas.

Fire Station
Original conceptual planning for this project considered the possibility of a future fire station on this site. Based on research from the City Attorney's office, a fire station may not be possible on this site due to grant deed limitations on the parcel. However, technical analyses and project exhibits were prepared prior to this being identified. Therefore, while the fire station appears in the documents, based on the City Attorney's review, staff will not be pursuing a fire station for the site.

Agreement Amendment
The design of Phase 1 of the 27-Acre Park has been progressing and is near the 75% completion phase. The City recently applied for grant funding from the State for the construction for the Phase 1 Project. The term of the contract with RRM ended in October 2022, so a contract amendment is required to extend the term of the contract so that the Phase 1 Project design plans can be completed and prepared for construction. The attached Third Contract Amendment (Attachment C) extends the term of the contract through June 2025. No other changes to the contract are proposed.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Due to total construction cost, the 27-Acre Park Project has been phased to allow the City to construct and open phases of the park as funding becomes available. Design of the Phase 1 Project is included in the approved Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for Fiscal Year 2023/2024. Costs related to the IS/MND preparation and approval are also funded from the approved FY 2023/2024 CIP budget. Construction funding has not yet been identified. No additional funding is being requested at this time.

As previously noted, the City is seeking funds for the construction of Phase 1 of the Project.

While funding is not guaranteed, the adoption of the IS/MND is a prerequisite to be eligible to receive funds through the Land and Water Conservation Grant Program, administered by OGALS, for which the City has applied. The City is still awaiting the results of the State’s evaluation of its grant application.

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund at this time.

ACCOUNT CODE:

CIP 062-1
579
ATTACHMENTS:

A - Resolution
A.1 - Exhibit 1 (IS-MND)
A.2.1 - Exhibit 2 (IS-MND Appendix 1, AQ-GHG Assessment) A.2.2 - Exhibit 2 (IS-MND Appendix 2, Park Development Plans) A.2.3 - Exhibit 2 (IS-MND Appendix 3, Bio-MSHCP Consistency Report) A.2.4 - Exhibit 2 (IS-MND Appendix 4, Archaeo Resources Report) A.2.5 - Exhibit 2 (IS-MND Appendix 5, Geotechnical Report) A.2.6 - Exhibit 2 (IS-MND Appendix 6, Noise Impact Assessment) A.3 - Exhibit 3 (IS-MND Response to Comments)
A.4 - Exhibit 4 (IS-MND MMRP)
B - Project Site Plan and Design Exhibits
C - Third Contract Amendment
580
4870-3477-8243 v1

ATTACHMENT A
City Council Resolution
for
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION (SCH NO. 2023080213), AND

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
(MMRP) FOR THE 27-ACRE PARK PROJECT LOCATED

ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LA ESTRELLA
STREET AND SUSAN DRIVE (APN: 376-350-009 AND 376-
350-017).

WHEREAS, the City Parks Master Plan calls for a community park on approximately 27-acres on the northeast corner of La Estrella Street and Susan Drive near Ronald Reagan Elementary School; and,
WHEREAS, the City had an existing agreement with a consultant for the design of Phase 1 of the 27-Acre Park Project (“Design Contract”); and WHEREAS, the City needs to needs to amend the Design Contract to extend the term to complete the final design work to prepare Phase 1 of the 27-acre park for construction; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed 27-Acre Park Project and contract amendment is considered a “project” as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq. (“CEQA”); and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines, the City Council is the lead agency for the 27-Acre Park Project; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director determined that there was substantial evidence that the 27-Acre Park project may have one or more significant effects on the environment and that preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) was therefore warranted under Public Resources Code § 21080(c); and,
WHEREAS, the 27-Acre Park project IS/MND consists of the following documents as Exhibits to this Resolution:
581
4870-3477-8243 v1
 Exhibit 1 - Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Document (SCH No. 2023080213);
 Exhibit 2 - IS/MND Technical Appendices (under separate cover).  Exhibit 3 – Response To Comments
 Exhibit 4 - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP).

WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15072, the Community Development Department on August 10, 2023 provided a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the State Clearinghouse, Riverside County Clerk, Press Enterprise, a local newspaper of general circulation, and the City’s local distribution list regarding the release of the draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed 27-Acre Park Project; and WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15073 and §15105, the draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated and made available to the State Clearinghouse/OPR, the city’s local distribution list, and other interested parties for a 30-day public review/comment period that commenced on August 10, 2023, and concluded on September 8, 2023; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines, the draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was posted at Wildomar Community Development Department and online at the City’s Environmental Documents Center website for a 30- day public review/comment period that commenced on August 10, 2023, and concluded on September 8, 2023; and
WHEREAS, during the 30-day public review period, the City received one public review comment concerning the draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, therefore, a Response to Comments document for the proposed 27-Acre Park project was prepared.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Wildomar, does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows:

SECTION 1 CEQA FINDINGS.

The City Council, in light of the whole record before it, including but not limited to, the draft IS/MND, Technical Appendices, Response to Comments, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibits 1 – 4 to this resolution) and all documents incorporated by reference therein, any comments received and responses provided, and other substantial evidence (within the meaning of Public Resources Code § 21080(e) and § 21082.2) within the record and/or provided at the public hearing hereby finds and determines as follows:

A. Review Period: That the City has provided a 30-day public review period which commenced on August 10, 2023, and concluded on September 8, 2023, for the 582
4870-3477-8243 v1
draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by CEQA Guidelines §15073 and §15105.

B. Compliance with Law: That the draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were prepared, processed, and noticed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.).

C. Independent Judgment: That the draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City.

D. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: That the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is designed to ensure compliance during project implementation in that changes to the project and/or mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project and are fully enforceable through project specifications, agreements, or other measures as required by Public Resources Code Section 21081.6.

E. No Significant Effect: That revisions made to the project as agreed to by the Public Works Department, and mitigation measures for the project, avoid or mitigate any potential significant effects on the environment identified in the Initial Study to a point below the threshold of significance.

SECTION 2. MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) The City Council hereby finds the 27-Acre Park project is consistent with the MSHCP, and the project is not located in any MSHCP criteria cell area, and required mitigation is provided through payment of the MSHCP Mitigation Fee, as applicable.

SECTION 3. CITY COUNCIL ACTION.

Based on the foregoing findings, and on substantial evidence in the whole of the record, the City Council hereby takes the following actions:

1. Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration/MMRP:

The City Council adopts the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (with technical appendices), Response to Comments, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 27-Acre Park project attached hereto this Resolution as Attachment A, Exhibits 1 - 4.

2. Filing a Notice of Determination:

In compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21152 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15075, the City Council directs the Community Development Director to file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the Riverside County Clerk for posting within five (5) working days of City Council approval of the 27-Acre Park project 583
4870-3477-8243 v1
and adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration & Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

3. Location:

The City Council directs the Community Development Director to keep on file the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Response to Comments, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 27-Acre Park Project, and all documents incorporated therein or forming the record of decision therefore, with the Wildomar Community Development Department at City Hall, located at 23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 110, Wildomar, CA 92595 and shall be made available for public review upon request in accordance with state law.

Amendment
The City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Design Contract with RRM Design Group to extend the term of the agreement to complete the design of Phase 1 of the 27-Acre Park Project and to prepare the Phase 1 Project for construction.
584
4870-3477-8243 v1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of October, 2023. _____________________________
Joseph Morabito
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
___________________________ ______________________________ Thomas D. Jex Janet Morales, CMC
City Attorney City Clerk
585
4870-3477-8243 v1
EXHIBIT 1
27-Acre Park Project IS/MND
(Under Separate Cover)
586
4870-3477-8243 v1
EXHIBIT 2
27-Acre Park Project Technical Appendices
(Under Separate Cover)
587
4870-3477-8243 v1
EXHIBIT 3
27-Acre Park Project Response to Comments
(Under Separate Cover)
588
4870-3477-8243 v1
EXHIBIT 4
27-Acre Park Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(Under Separate Cover)
589

INITIAL STUDY &

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1)
Lead Agency:

City of Wildomar
23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 110
Wildomar, CA 92595
Prepared by:

PlaceWorks
3 MacArthur Place Suite 1100
Santa Ana, CA 92707
August 2023
590

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY FOR PUBLIC REVIEW OF AN INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE WILDOMAR 27-ACRE PARK PROJECT
An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared by the City of Wildomar for the proposed 27-Acre Park Project (CIP 062-1). The IS/MND and technical appendices will be available for public review/comment beginning on Thursday, August 10, 2023. All files can be downloaded from the City of Wildomar Environmental Documents Center webpage at the following web address:
https://www.cityofwildomar.org/212/Environmental-Documents-Center.

The City of Wildomar Public Works Department is proposing to develop a 27-acre park with 221 parking spaces; six driveways; and amenities including bike trails and bike plaza, fitness plaza, fire station, splash pad, playgrounds, volleyball courts, gardens, community green area, community center, amphitheater, shade structures, lookout points, trails, bridge crossings, interpretive signs, bioretention/biofiltration areas, and connection to the Ronald Reagan Elementary School. The proposed project includes the following applications:
• CEQA/Mitigated Negative Declaration: In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15070, the proposed project will require the preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). • Plot Plan (PP): The proposed project will require approval of a Plot Plan to develop the proposed project in accordance with Section 17.16 of the Wildomar Municipal Code, and onsite and offsite improvements consistent with the City’s Parks Master Plan standards.

The IS/MND identifies impacts that require mitigation in the following topic areas: Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Wildfire.

Significant and unavoidable impacts and cumulatively considerable impacts have not been identified in any of the environmental issue areas. The project is not located on any hazardous materials sites enumerated under Section 65962.5 of the California Government Code.

In accordance with Sections 15072(a) and (b) of the CEQA Guidelines, this public notice is posted to officially notify the public, public agencies, and responsible and trustee agencies that the required 30-day public review/comment period will commence on Thursday, August 10, 2023, and conclude on Friday, September 8, 2023. Any written comments (via email or letter) on the IS/MND must be submitted no later than 5 p.m. on September 8, 2023. Written comments may be mailed to Matthew C. Bassi, Community Development Director, City of Wildomar Community Development Department, 23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite #110, Wildomar, CA 92595. Email comments can be sent to [email protected].

Posted: August 10, 2023
591
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION......................................................................... 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT SITE ................................................................................................................................................ 1 PHYSICAL SETTING ......................................................................................................................................... 6 REGULATORY SETTING .................................................................................................................................... 6 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION.......................................................................................................... 6 FIRE STATION ................................................................................................................................................ 6 COMMUNITY CENTER/AMPHITHEATER .............................................................................................................. 7 OTHER AMENITIES ......................................................................................................................................... 7 BIORETENTION/BIOFILTRATION AREAS .............................................................................................................. 7 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES ................................................................................................................................... 8 LANDSCAPING ............................................................................................................................................... 8 LIGHTING...................................................................................................................................................... 8 ACCESS AND PARKING..................................................................................................................................... 8 WATER/SEWER/SOLID WASTE......................................................................................................................... 9 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN FEATURES ...................................................................................................................... 9 PHASING ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 10 IV. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 12 VI. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM.................................................................................... 26 A. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 26 B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED................................................................. 28 C. DETERMINATION......................................................................................................................... 29 D. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS........................................................................................................ 30

1. AESTHETICS..................................................................................................................................... 30

2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES ........................................................................................... 33

3. AIR QUALITY ................................................................................................................................... 35

4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................... 43

5. CULTURAL RESOURCES...................................................................................................................... 50

6. ENERGY.......................................................................................................................................... 53

7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ........................................................................................................................ 57

8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ........................................................................................................... 62 592
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND ii

9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS .............................................................................................. 67

10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ..................................................................................................... 71

11. LAND USE AND PLANNING................................................................................................................. 77

12. MINERAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................................................... 79

13. NOISE ............................................................................................................................................ 80

14. POPULATION AND HOUSING .............................................................................................................. 86

15. PUBLIC SERVICES ............................................................................................................................. 87

16. RECREATION ................................................................................................................................... 89

17. TRANSPORTATION............................................................................................................................ 90

18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................................... 94

19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ...................................................................................................... 101

20. WILDFIRE ..................................................................................................................................... 106 VII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ........................................................................ 109 I. REFERENCES...................................................................................................................... 116 TABLES
Table ES-1 Project Impact and Mitigation Summary .................................................................................. 13 Table 3-1 Project Construction Regional Pollutant Emissions Summary.................................................... 37 Table 3-2 Summary of Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions ............................................................. 39 Table 3-3 Project Localized Construction Emissions................................................................................... 39 Table 3-4 Project Localized Operational Emissions .................................................................................... 40 Table 8-1 Proposed Project GHG Emissions................................................................................................ 62 Table 8-2 WRCOG CAP Local Reduction Measure Project Consistency...................................................... 64 Table 13-1 Construction Average Noise Levels (dBA) at Nearest Receptors.............................................. 81 Table 13-2 Calculated Operational Onsite Noise........................................................................................ 83 Table 13-3 Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment............................................................... 84 Table 13-4 Construction Vibration Levels at 362 Feet................................................................................ 84 Table 19-1 EVMWD Water Treatment Facilities....................................................................................... 103

FIGURES
Figure 1 Regional Location........................................................................................................................ 3 Figure 2 Local Vicinity ............................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 3 Aerial Photograph ....................................................................................................................... 5 593
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND iii
Figure 4 Conceptual Site Plan ................................................................................................................. 11 Figure 5 Drainage Map............................................................................................................................ 75

APPENDICES

1. Appendix 1 – Project Development Plans, RRM Design Group (June 7, 2022).

2. Appendix 2 – Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment (June 29, 2023).

3. Appendix 3 – Biological Technical Report and Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency Analysis, ECORP Consulting, Inc. (July 2023)

4. Appendix 4 – Archaeological Resources Inventory Report, ECORP Consulting, Inc. (July 2023)

5. Appendix 5 – Geotechnical Evaluation, Ninyo and Moore (March 26, 2021).

6. Appendix 6 – Noise Impact Assessment, ECORP Consulting, Inc. (June 2023).

Note to Reader: To save natural resources, the appendices are contained on a CD-ROM/USB included with the printed copy of this Initial Study. The appendices are also available on the City’s Environmental Documents Center webpage at the following web address:
(http://www.cityofwildomar.org/cms/One.aspx?portalId=9894827&pageId=10911316).

The documents can also be viewed here:

City of Wildomar, Community Development Department
23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 110
Wildomar, CA 92595
Hours: Monday–Thursday, 8 a.m. – 5 p.m. (closed Fridays) 594
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 1
I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project Summary
This project proposes to construct a 27-acre park with 221 parking spaces; six driveways(two on Wildomar Trail, one on La Estrella Street, and three on Susan Drive); and amenities including bike trails and bike plaza, fitness plaza, splash pad, playgrounds, volleyball courts, gardens, community green area, community center, amphitheater, shade structures, lookout points, trails, bridge crossings, interpretive signs, bioretention/biofiltration areas, and connection to Ronald Reagan Elementary School. A potential future fire station is also considered, although it is unknown at this time whether the fire station will be feasible at this location. Figure 4, Conceptual Site Plan, shows the locations of these uses on the project site.

Purpose and Project Overview
This Initial Study evaluates the proposed project which is being processed through the following development applications:
• Plot Plan (PP): Approval of the proposed project plans will become the plot plan; the proposed project will be developed in accordance with Section 17.16 of the Wildomar Municipal Code and onsite and offsite improvements consistent with the City’s Parks Master Plan standards.

The purpose of this Initial Study is to evaluate the potential environmental effects associated with the construction and use of the planned development project and to provide mitigation where necessary to avoid, minimize, or lessen environmental effects.

In addition to the proposed project site, the City will construct half-width frontage improvements on La Estrella Street, Susan Drive, and Wildomar Trail, which may include curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting improvements, pavement widening, and sewer and potable water main extensions.

II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Project Site
Project Location
The project site bounds the northern and western portions of Ronald Reagan Elementary School which is located at 35445 Wildomar Trail; the project site consists of two parcels forming an L-shape that cover 27 acres, and is comprised of APNs 376-350-009 and 376-350-017. The Interstate 15 (I-15) is approximately

0.5-mile southwest of the project site. Regional and local vicinity maps of the project site are shown in Figure 1, Regional Location, and Figure 2, Local Vicinity. An aerial photograph of the site is shown in Figure 3, Aerial Photograph.

Surrounding Area
The project site is bordered by residential land uses to the east, rural residential uses and vacant land to the north, vacant land directly south with residential uses further south, Ronald Reagan Elementary School to the southeast, and rural residential uses to the west. The General Plan Land Use designation for the project site and the surrounding area to the west, south, and east is Medium Density Residential 595
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 2
(MDR); the school located directly southeast of the project site is designated as Public Facilities; and the Land Use designation to the north of the project site is Very Low Density Residential (VLDR). The Zoning designation for the project site and the surrounding area to the south, west, and north is Rural Residential (R-R); the area east of the project site is zoned for Residential (R-1). Commercial uses are located approximately 0.5-miles southeast of the site.

Access
Regional access to the project site is provided by I-15 located approximately 0.5-miles southwest. In addition, local access to the site is provided by Wildomar Trail directly east and further north of the project site. Susan Drive and Peggy Lane provide access to the project site from the west, and La Estrella Street provides access to the project site from the south.
596
PlaceWorks
Figure 1 - Regional Location
27-ACRE PARK INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

CITY OF WILDOMAR
Source: Genarated using ArcMap, 2023.

II. Existing Conditions
0 Scale (Miles)
3 Note: Unincorporated county areas are shown in white.

Project Site
215
15 15
County of Riverside
County of San Diego
597
PlaceWorks
Figure 2 - Local Vicinity
Source: Genarated using ArcMap, 2023.
0 Scale (Feet)
2,000
Project Boundary
15 MURRIETA

WILDOMAR

MURRIETA

MENIFEE
La Estrella St
Peggy Ln
Palamino Rd
Wildomar Trl
Susan Dr
Wildomar Trl
Iodine Springs Rd
Salida Del Sol
Maples Rd
Bayless Rd
Clinton Keith Rd
Prielipp Rd
Inland Valley Rd
Jana Ln
Kennadine Dr
Catt Rd
Palomar St
Grand Ave
Robards Wy
Twinflower Ave
Frederick St
Bundy Canyon Rd
Oneal Rd
Sunset Ave
The Farm Rd
Oak Circle Dr
Sunnybrook Dr
Hidden Springs Rd
Harvest Wy
Charles St
Killarney Ln
Monte Vista Dr
Country Park Dr
Rosita Dr George Ave
Ronald Reagan
Elementary
School
II. Existing Conditions
27-ACRE PARK INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

CITY OF WILDOMAR
598
PlaceWorks
Figure 3 - Aerial Photograph
Source: Nearmap, 2023.
0 Scale (Feet)
500
Project Boundary
Rural
Residential
Ronald Reagan
Elementary School
Palamino Rd
Doheny Cir
Peggn Ln
Glazebrook Rd
La Estrella St
Wildomar Trl
Susan Dr
Senna Dr
Plata Ct
Safiro Ct
Brillante Dr
Rubi Ct
Esmeralda Ct
Montecito Dr
Varian Wy
Capistrano St
poplar Crest Rd
Bovard St
Capitola Ct
Dulock Rd
Iodine Springs Rd
Depasqualle Rd
Westpark St
Keane Ct
Sycamore Bluff Ct Susan Dr
Steven St
El Diamante Dr
Rosita Dr
Wildomar Trl Iodine Springs Rd
II. Existing Conditions
Higher Density
Residential
Higher Density
Residential
27-ACRE PARK INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

CITY OF WILDOMAR
599
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 6
Physical Setting
The project site consists of an undeveloped and vacant lot with exposed soil, moderate growths of native shrubs, and several trees on the west, north and eastern perimeter of the site. The project site’s existing conditions are shown in Figure 3, Aerial Photograph. As shown on Figure 3, there is a natural drainage that traverses the site from north to south.

Conservation
The proposed project site is not within a Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Criteria Cell (WRCRCA 2023).

Natural Hazards
The project site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Zone, and no active faults traverse the site (Ninyo and Moore 2021). The project site does not fall within a mapped Fault Zone (RCIT 2023; Ninyo and Moore 2021). The project site is located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) in a Local Responsibility Area (LRA) (CAL FIRE 2022).

Regulatory Setting
The City of Wildomar General Plan designates this site as Medium Density Residential (MDR). Approval of the proposed project plans will become the Plot Plan.

III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project proposes to construct a 27-acre park with 221 parking spaces; six driveways(two on Wildomar Trail, one on La Estrella Street, and three on Susan Drive); and amenities including bike trails and bike plaza, fitness plaza, splash pad, playgrounds, volleyball courts, gardens, community green area, community center, amphitheater, shade structures, lookout points, trails, bridge crossings, interpretive signs, bioretention/biofiltration areas, and connection to Ronald Reagan Elementary School. A potential future fire station is also considered, although it is unknown at this time whether the fire station will be feasible at this location. Figure 4, Conceptual Site Plan, shows the locations of these uses on the project site.

The proposed development plans, including architectural renderings, are provided in Appendix 1.

Fire Station
NOTE TO READER. Original conceptual planning for this project considered the possibility of a future fire station on this site. During preparation of this initial study, it was determined that a fire station may not be possible on this site. However, all the technical analysis and project exhibits were prepared prior to this discovery and due to grant funding deadlines, there was no time to revise the technical analysis and graphics. Therefore, while the fire station appears in this document it may not be part of the constructed project as approved by the City Council.

An approximately 8,700-square-foot fire station may be constructed on the west side of the project site, with access via one driveway from Susan Drive. The building would be one- to two-stories tall with a maximum height of 41 feet. A shared parking lot with 39 spaces would wrap around the north and east 600
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 7
side of the building, and include sidewalks along the perimeter as well as security fencing. The proposed fire station would include pedestrian-level exterior lighting for security, and more intensive lighting for emergencies.

Community Center/Amphitheater
The proposed 26-foot-and-2-inch tall, 8,700-square-foot community center would be in the approximate center of the project site and be accessed by the southern entrance and parking area, as shown in Figure 4, Conceptual Site Plan. The building would be painted yellow and be designed in a farmhouse style. The southwest side of the building would have a patio with planters, benches, trees, and interpretive signage.

The northeast side of the building would feature a stage for the amphitheater and would be constructed of retaining walls to provide seating.

The community center may be available for daytime and evening activities such as classes, luncheons, community meetings, weddings, and similar celebrations. While the operations requirements have not yet been drafted, this initial study assumes that evening activities would be time-limited to end at 10:00 PM consistent with Section 9.48.060 D of the Municipal Code.

Other Amenities
As shown in Figure 4, Conceptual Site Plan, the proposed nature playground would be in the southcentral portion of the project site, north of the community green. A splash pad would be constructed to the north of the nature playground. A 22-foot-and-7-inch picnic pavilion would be constructed to the south of the nature playground. A public restroom would be located at the south end of the nature playground. Sand volleyball courts would be located to the west of the nature playground, directly south of the western parking lot. A community green and demonstration garden would be located further south of the nature playground. A bike plaza would be located directly north of the fire station and feature minimal landscaping, and a bike path loop would be located north of the bike plaza. A fitness plaza would be located northeast of the southern parking lot and have a connection to the hilltop play area via a natural trail. The hilltop play area and hilltop climb area would be located in the northern portion of the project site and be connected by a trail with a bridge crossing. The hilltop play area would feature an adventure play area, shade structure and flagpole with solar light. The hilltop climb area would feature railroad terraces and a trail to access a lookout point with trees, landscaping, seating area, and interpretive signage.

Bioretention/Biofiltration Areas
As discussed in greater detail in VI. 10 Hydrology and Water Quality, a biofiltration basin would be constructed on the southern side of the project site between the community green and demonstration garden, and another basin would be constructed south of the demonstration garden. A basin would be constructed at the southern end of the turf field, south of the sand volleyball courts. Another rectangular basin would be constructed directly west of the fire station in the western parking lot. Two smaller biofiltration basins would be constructed directly north of Ronald Reagan Elementary school, west of the school connection. A basin would also be constructed along the eastern edge of the eastern parking area lot.
601
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 8
Pedestrian Facilities
As shown in Figure 4, Conceptual Site Plan, the parking lots would have sidewalks surrounding them. A network of trails would traverse the northern portion of the project site with meandering 8-foot-wide concrete pathways connecting the amphitheater and the hilltop play area. Additional 4-foot-wide natural trails would connect the hilltop play area with surrounding areas, including the parking lots to the south and east, and the hilltop climb area.

A 4-foot-wide trail would also connect the eastern parking area to the Ronald Reagan Elementary School with a bridge crossing. A decomposed granite pathway would connect this connection to the southern parking lot. A bike path loop would be developed in the northwestern portion of the project site. The community center would connect to the parking lots and fire station on the eastern portion of the site via a pathway and bridge crossing. This pathway would also provide connection to the nature playground, splash pad, and the community green.

Landscaping
The proposed project would preserve natural vegetation, to the extent feasible, and enhance the landscaping on the site.

In the northern portion of the site, the lookout areas would be landscaped with bushes and trees, the community patio would feature hardscaping and planter boxes, the sidewalk to the east of the nature playground would include planter boxes with utility hook-ups for vendors, the community green would be installed south of the nature playground and would include lawn, and the turf area would be located to the south of the volleyball courts. Additionally, the southwest portion of the site would have a demonstration garden.

Landscaping would consist of climate-appropriate trees, shrubs, and groundcover plant species varying in size through the project site. Specialty planting would include a pollinator demonstration garden, bioswale planting, and native riparian. Turf would be strategically placed for general park uses. In addition, native plantings on the site would be left undisturbed around trails, along the hillsides. Landscaping onsite will be approved by the City prior to the installation of landscaping.

Lighting
The proposed project would include LED pedestrian lights and landscape lighting to ensure compliance with the City’s Dark Sky Ordinance.

Access and Parking
Access to the project site would be provided via six entrances/exits: two along Wildomar Trail, one along La Estrella Street, and three along Susan Drive. Emergency access to the site would be provided via the southern driveway on La Estrella Street.

A connection to Ronald Reagan Elementary School with concrete steps and an accessible ramp would be developed on the north side of the school.

The proposed project would include a total of 221 parking spaces as follows: 39 spaces in the northwestern parking lot, 33 spaces in the southwestern parking lot, 125 spaces in the southern parking 602
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 9
lot, and 24 spaces in the eastern parking lot. The proposed project would include electric vehicle (EV) spaces, and ADA-accessible parking spaces. The project site would also include bicycle racks adjacent to the fire station and the community center.

Once completed, the proposed project is anticipated to generate a total of 118 weekday trips with 10 peak AM trips and 14 peak PM trips, a total of 123 Saturday trips with 18 peak hour trips, and a total of 111 Sunday trips with 16 peak hour trips.

Water/Sewer/Solid Waste
Water and sewer services would be provided by Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, electrical power services by Southern California Edison, and natural gas services by Southern California Gas. Existing water lines are located on La Estrella Street and Wildomar Trail. Existing sewer lines are located on La Estrella Street. Additional electric, gas, telephone, and cable services to the proposed development would be provided through extension of existing infrastructure. The installation of all utilities will be installed per the requirements of the service providers. Additionally, all solid waste onsite will be handled, collected, transported, and disposed of in accordance with the City’s requirements.

Sustainable Design Features
The project proposed would be designed to preserve the natural topography to the extent possible, including the preservation of natural drainage courses throughout the project site as well as building pedestrian bridges over drainage courses instead of grading those areas and placing culverts. The proposed project would also include water quality features to help mitigate stormwater/non-stormwater runoff pollution (see Biofiltration/Bioretention Areas, above). Other sustainable design features would include erosion and sediment control, low water use plants, drip irrigation for shrub areas, native soils for trails, and LED light fixtures. The proposed project would also install bridges over drainage features/wetlands where feasible, to avoid impacts to these features.

Phasing
Due to total project const and funding constraints, the project may be built in at least two phases. The first phase would construct four driveways: one on the west, one on the south, and two on the east sides of the project site. Phase I would include construction of the bike plaza and bike trails on the northwest side of the project site, a windmill with planting in the center of the site in place of the future community center, trails throughout the northern portion of the site, and the hilltop play area and hilltop climb areas in the north and northeastern portions of the site, respectively.

Phase I parking would include full buildout of the parking lot on the east side of the project site with 16 spaces, sidewalks, and two driveways. The southern parking lot would feature a decomposed granite road with 10 parking spaces, and 2 ADA spaces, arranged in a cul-de-sac that provides emergency vehicle access. The parking lot on the northwest side of the project site would be decomposed granite with approximately 60 parking spaces, and 2 ADA spaces, minimal landscaping, sidewalks, and a portable restroom facility.
603
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 10
Offsite Improvements
The proposed project would construct half-width frontage improvements on La Estrella Street, Susan Drive, and Wildomar Trail, which may include curb, gutter, sidewalk, fire hydrants, street lighting improvements, pavement to match the curb and gutter to the existing road pavement, and sewer and potable water main extensions to the site and within the property. 604
W
W
W
W W
SS SS
W
W

EXISTING NATURAL

DRAINAGE WITH HABITAT

ENHANCEMENTS

WALKING LOOP

PARKING

RESTROOM

DEMONSTRATION

FIRE STATION

PARENT DROP-OFFPARKINGBIO INFILTRATION

DROP-OFF MAINTENANCE

VEHICLE PARKING

PLANTER BOXES WITHUTILITY HOOK-UPS FOR
VENDORS, TYP.

RONALD REAGAN ELEMENTARY
APN: 376350019 & 376350020
Source: RRM Design Group 2021.

PlaceWorks
0 Scale (Feet)
160
27-ACRE PARK INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

CITY OF WILDOMAR
Figure 4 - Conceptual Site Plan
III. Existing Conditions
Project Boundary
605
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 12
IV. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Through analysis provided in this MND, it was determined that the proposed project has the potential to result in significant environmental impacts to Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Wildfire. Mitigation measures are identified that would reduce all impacts to less than significant levels. Table ES-1, Project Impact and Mitigation Summary, presents an at-a-glance summary of the identified significant impact issue areas and required mitigation measures.
606
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 13
Table ES-1 Project Impact and Mitigation Summary

4. Biological Resources
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
BIO-1 All ground-disturbing ac�vi�es shall be conducted during the nonbreeding season for birds (approximately September 1 through January 14) to the greatest extent possible. This will avoid viola�ons of the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code Sec�ons 3503, 3503.5 and 3513. If ac�vi�es with the poten�al to disrupt nes�ng birds are scheduled to occur during the bird breeding season (January 15 through August 31), a preconstruc�on survey for nes�ng birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist who is experienced in the iden�fica�on of avian species and conduc�ng nes�ng bird surveys. The nes�ng survey shall include the project site and adjacent areas where project ac�vi�es have the poten�al to cause nest failure.

The preconstruc�on survey shall be conducted no more than 3 days prior to the start of ground-disturbing ac�vi�es within the bird breeding season. If no nes�ng birds are observed during the survey, site prepara�on and construc�on ac�vi�es may begin. If nes�ng birds (including nes�ng raptors) are found to be present, avoidance or minimiza�on measures shall be implemented to avoid poten�al Project-related impacts. Measures shall include, but are not limited to, establishment of an avoidance buffer un�l nes�ng has been completed and periodic nest monitoring by the Project biologist un�l the juveniles have fledged and there has been no evidence of a second atempt at nes�ng. The width of the avoidance buffer will be determined by the Project biologist. The monitoring biologist will monitor the nest(s) during construc�on and document any findings. Once nes�ng is deemed complete by the Project biologist, work may resume within the avoidance buffer area.

Timing/Implementation: Within three (3) days prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing work Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Community Development Department BIO-2 A preconstruction survey for Burrowing Owl shall be conducted within the project site and adjacent areas within 30 days prior to the start of ground-disturbing activities. The surveys shall follow the methods described in the Western Riverside MSHCP Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions. If burrowing owls and/or suitable burrowing owl burrows with signs (e.g., whitewash, pellets, feathers, prey remains) are identified in the project area during the survey and impacts to those features are unavoidable, then additional avoidance and minimization measures will need to be implemented to avoid impacts as a result of the proposed project in accordance with 607
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 14
Table ES-1 Project Impact and Mitigation Summary
CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. Additional avoidance and minimization measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist and will include non-disturbance buffers established around active burrows, seasonal work restrictions, or additional survey and monitoring requirements. If the qualified biologist determines that development of a Burrowing Owl Management Plan is necessary, the qualified biologist will outline additional protection and avoidance and minimization measures specific to burrowing owl. If proposed project-related impacts to burrowing owl are unavoidable even after implementing additional avoidance and minimization measures, then coordination with CDFW will need to occur to discuss the implementation of additional mitigation requirements such as passive relocation.

Timing/Implementation: Within 30 days prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing work Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Community Development Department BIO-3 Due to the presence of suitable habitat, a focused survey for Crotch bumble bee, a California ESA Candidate species, shall be conducted prior to the start of grounddisturbing ac�vi�es to determine the presence or absence of the species within the project site. If the species is observed within the project site and project-related impacts are unavoidable, then addi�onal mi�ga�on or avoidance and minimiza�on measures will be implemented, and the proposed project will need to obtain the necessary permits and authoriza�ons from CDFW (i.e., Incidental Take Permit under Sec�on 2081 of the California ESA). Addi�onal avoidance and minimiza�on measures will include habitat preserva�on, compensatory mi�ga�on through the purchase and conserva�on of habitat within its range, non-disturbance buffers around nest loca�ons, biological monitoring requirements, and/or seasonal work restric�ons.

Timing/Implementation: Prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing work Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Community Development Department c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
BIO-4 A formal Aqua�c Resource Delinea�on shall be prepared prior to the start of construc�on ac�vi�es to determine if the drainage features within the project site contain aqua�c resources jurisdic�onal to the US Army Corps of Engineers, Regional 608
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 15
Table ES-1 Project Impact and Mitigation Summary
Water Quality Control Board, or California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and to determine the acreage of MSHCP Riparian/Riverine resources present onsite.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife and Regional Water Quality Control Board jurisdic�onal waters are regulated by state and local governments under a no-net-loss policy, and all impacts are considered significant and shall be avoided to the greatest extent possible. Impacts to jurisdic�onal waters require mi�ga�on through habitat crea�on, restora�on, or enhancement as determined by consulta�on with the regulatory agencies during the permi�ng process. Any impacts to California Department of Fish and Wildlife jurisdic�on would require a Sec�on 1602 SAA from California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Any impacts to Waters of the U.S. would require a Sec�on 404 permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers. Impacts to Waters of the U.S. will require a Sec�on 404 permit and will qualify for a Na�onwide Permit 14 authoriza�on from the United States Army Corps of Engineers. Any impacts to Waters of the U.S. or State will also require a 401 Cer�fica�on or Waste Discharge Requirements from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Timing/Implementation: Prior to the initiation of construction activities Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Community Development Department BIO-5 A Determina�on of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preserva�on shall be prepared prior to the start of construc�on ac�vi�es, in conjunc�on with the Aqua�c Resource Delinea�on, to address proposed impacts to MSHCP Riparian/Riverine resources located within the project site. Impacts to MSHCP Riparian/Riverine resources will require mi�ga�on to be approved by the Wildlife Agencies (CDFW and USFWS).

Timing/Implementation: Prior to the initiation of construction activities Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Community Development Department d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Implement Mitigation Measure BIO-1.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 609
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 16
Table ES-1 Project Impact and Mitigation Summary
Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Implement Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2.

5. Cultural Resources
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Implement Mitigation Measures TRI-1 through TRI-8 (see Tribal Cultural Resources, below). c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
CUL-1 Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted within the period specified by law (24 hours). Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the “most likely descendant.” The most likely descendant shall then make recommendations and engage in consultation concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.

Timing/Implementation: During any ground-disturbing construction activities Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
Implement Mitigation Measures TRI-7 and TRI-8 (see Tribal Cultural Resources, below).

7. Geology and Soils
a) i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 610
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 17
Table ES-1 Project Impact and Mitigation Summary
Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
GEO-1 The City’s Public Works Department shall incorporate the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report prepared by Ninyo and Moore (Appendix 5) into project plans related to the proposed project. The project’s building plans shall demonstrate that they incorporate all applicable recommendations of the Geotechnical Report and comply with all applicable requirements of the latest adopted version of the California Building Code.

Timing/Implementation: During building plan check, prior to any ground-disturbing construction activities
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Community Development Department and Public Works and Engineering Department
a) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Implement Mitigation Measure GEO-1
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Implement Mitigation Measure GEO-1
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?
Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Implement Mitigation Measure GEO-1
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
GEO-2 A paleontological grading observation schedule by a Certified Paleontologist shall be maintained when grading in bedrock units to further evaluate the fossil resources of the site. 611
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 18
Table ES-1 Project Impact and Mitigation Summary
Salvage operations shall be initiated by the Certified Paleontologist and coordinated with the City’s Public Works Department if other significant concentrations of fossils, as determined by the Certified Paleontologist, are encountered. Any paleontological resources shall be provided for curation at a local curation facility, or any other local museum or repository willing and able to accept and house the resource to preserve for future scientific study.

Timing/Implementation: During ground-disturbing construction activities Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Community Development Department and Public Works and Engineering Department

9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
HAZ-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the City’s Public Works Department shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Building Official and the Riverside County Fire Chief, compliance with the 2022 California Building Code (or the most recent edition) (Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations) and the 2022 California Fire Code (or the most recent edition) (Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including those regulations pertaining to materials and construction methods intended to mitigate wildfire exposure as described in the 2022 California Building Code and California Residential Code (or most recent edition); specifically California Building Code Chapter 7A; California Residential Code Section R327; California Residential Code Section R337; California Referenced Standards Code Chapter 12-7A; and California Fire Code Chapter 49.

Timing/Implementation: Prior to issuance of building permits Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Building Department and Riverside County Fire Department
HAZ-2 Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the City’s Public Works Department shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Building Official and the County Fire Chief, compliance with the vegetation management requirements prescribed in California Fire Code Section 4906 and California Government Code Section 51182.

Timing/Implementation: Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Building Department and Riverside County Fire Department
612
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 19
Table ES-1 Project Impact and Mitigation Summary

18. Tribal Cultural Resources
a) i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k).

Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
TRI-1 Inadvertent Archeological Find. If during ground disturbance activities, cultural resources are discovered that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, the following procedures shall be followed. Cultural resources are defined, as being multiple artifacts in close association with each other, but also include fewer artifacts if the area of the find is determined to be of significance due to its sacred or cultural importance as determined in consultation with the lead agency and Native American Tribe(s) that elected to consult under AB 52 (“Consulting Tribe(s)”).
a. All ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resources shall be halted until a meeting is convened between the developer, the archaeologist, the tribal representative(s) and the Community Development Director to discuss the significance of the find.
b. At the meeting, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed and after consultation with the tribal representative(s), developer, and the archaeologist, a decision shall be made, with the concurrence of the Community Development Director, as to the appropriate mitigation (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resources.
c. Grading or further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors if needed. d. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Treatment and Monitoring Agreements entered into with the Consulting Tribe(s) and the applicant. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in-place preservation of cultural resources located in native soils and/or re-burial on the Project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity as identified in Mitigation Measures TRI-2 and TRI-7.
e. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan (see Mitigation Measure TRI-6) shall be prepared by the project archeologist, in consultation with the Consulting 613
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 20
Table ES-1 Project Impact and Mitigation Summary
Tribe(s), and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the said plan.
f. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and tribal cultural resources. If the landowner and the Consulting Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or tribal cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the Community Development Director for decision. The City’s Community Development Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological and tribal cultural resources, recommendations of the project archeologist, and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Consulting Tribe(s). Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council.

Timing/Implementation: During any ground-disturbing or construction activities Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-2 Cultural Resources Disposition. In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries:
a. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the Consulting Tribe(s). Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Wildomar Community Development Department:
i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources. ii. Reburial of the resources on the Project property. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report (see Mitigation Measure TRI6). The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request.
614
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 21
Table ES-1 Project Impact and Mitigation Summary
iii. If preservation in place or reburial is not feasible then the resources shall be curated in a culturally appropriate manner at a Riverside County curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources ensuring access and use pursuant to the Guidelines. The collection and associated records shall be transferred, including title, and are to be accompanied by payment of the fees by the Applicant necessary for permanent curation. Evidence of curation in the form of a letter from the curation facility stating that subject archaeological materials have been received and that all fees have been paid, shall be provided by the landowner to the City. There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items, burial goods, and Native American human remains, as defined by the cultural and religious practices of the Most Likely Descendant. Results concerning finds of any inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV monitoring report.

Timing/Implementation: During grading activities
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-3 Archaeologist Retained. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the project applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA), to monitor all ground disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources.

The Registered Professional Archaeologist and the Tribal monitor(s) required by Mitigation Measures TRI-4 and TRI-5 shall manage and oversee monitoring for all initial ground disturbing activities and excavation of each portion of the project site including clearing, grubbing, tree removals, mass or rough grading, trenching, stockpiling of materials, rock crushing, structure demolition and etc. The Registered Professional Archaeologist and the Tribal monitor(s), shall independently have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt the ground disturbance activities to allow identification, evaluation, and potential recovery of cultural resources in coordination with any required special interest or tribal monitors.

The developer/permit holder shall submit a fully executed copy of the contract to the Community Development Department to ensure compliance with this condition of approval.

Upon verification, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition.

In addition, the Registered Professional Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) in consultation pursuant to the definition in AB 52 to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. A 615
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 22
Table ES-1 Project Impact and Mitigation Summary
consulting tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Cal Pub Res Code Section 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB52. Details in the Plan shall include:
a. Project grading and development scheduling;
b. The Project archaeologist and the Consulting Tribes(s) shall attend the pregrading meeting with the City, the construction manager and any contractors and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The Training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the Project and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earthmoving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until the find(s) can be properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols. All new construction personnel that will conduct earthwork or grading activities that begin work on the Project following the initial Training must take the Cultural Sensitivity Training prior to beginning work and the Project archaeologist and Consulting Tribe(s) shall make themselves available to provide the training on an as-needed basis; c. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s) and Project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.

Timing/Implementation: Prior to issuance of grading permit Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-4 Native American Monitoring (Pechanga). Tribal monitor(s) shall be required on-site during all ground-disturbing activities, including grading, stockpiling of materials, engineered fill, rock crushing, etc. The land divider/permit holder shall retain a qualified tribal monitor(s) from the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a copy of a signed contract between the above-mentioned Tribe and the land divider/permit holder for the monitoring of the project to the Community Development Department and to the Engineering Department. The Tribal Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt the ground-disturbance activities to allow recovery of cultural resources, in coordination with the Project Archaeologist.

Timing/Implementation: During ground-disturbing activities 616
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 23
Table ES-1 Project Impact and Mitigation Summary
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-5 Native American Monitoring (Soboba). Tribal monitor(s) shall be required on-site during all ground-disturbing activities, including grading, stockpiling of materials, engineered fill, rock crushing, etc. The land divider/permit holder shall retain a qualified tribal monitor(s) from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a copy of a signed contract between the above-mentioned Tribe and the land divider/permit holder for the monitoring of the project to the Community Development Department and to the Engineering Department. The Tribal Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt the ground-disturbance activities to allow recovery of cultural resources, in coordination with the Project Archaeologist.

The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre-grade meeting. The Community Development Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition. Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California Riverside (UCR) and one (1) copy shall be submitted to the Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s).

Timing/Implementation: Prior to final inspection
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-7 Non-Disclosure of Reburial Locations. It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains or associated grave goods shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. The Coroner, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 I., parties, and Lead Agencies, will 617
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 24
Table ES-1 Project Impact and Mitigation Summary
be asked to withhold public disclosure information related to such reburial, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r).

Timing/Implementation: During discovery of Native American human remains Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-8 No-Build Easement or Similar Instrument. In the event that Native American artifacts are found and buried within the project vicinity, a no-build easement, or similar legal instrument, shall be used to preclude future development from taking place on the reburial site(s).

Timing/Implementation: After Reburial of Native American Artifacts Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1.
a) ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision(c) of Public Resources Code § 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code § 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

20. Wildfire
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Implement Mitigation Measures HAZ‐1 and HAZ-2
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Implement Mitigation Measures HAZ‐1 and HAZ-2
Mandatory Findings of Significance
618
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 25
Table ES-1 Project Impact and Mitigation Summary
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Implement Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO-5, CUL-1, GEO-2, and TRI-1 through TRI-8. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects).

Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Implement Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO-5, CUL-1, GEO-1, GEO-2, HAZ-1, HAZ-2, and TRI1 through TRI-8. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Level of Significance
without Mitigation
Potentially Significant Resulting Level of
Significance
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Implement Mitigation Measure GEO-1.
619
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 26
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
A. BACKGROUND

1. Project Title:
27-Acre Park

2. Lead Agency Name and Address:

City of Wildomar, 23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 110, Wildomar, CA 92595

3. Contact Person and Phone Number:

Matthew Bassi, Community Development Director; (951) 677-7751, ext. 213

4. Project Location:

The project is at the northwest of Ronald Reagan Elementary School and encompasses Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 376-350-009, and 376-350-017.

5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address:

Dan York, City Manager; 23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 110, Wildomar, CA

6. General Plan Designation:

Medium Density Residential (MDR)

7. Zoning:

Rural Residential (R-R)

8. Description of Project:

This project proposes to construct a 27-acre park with 221 parking spaces; six driveways(two on Wildomar Trail, one on La Estrella Street, and three on Susan Drive); and amenities including bike trails and bike plaza, fitness plaza, splash pad, playgrounds, volleyball courts, gardens, community green area, community center, amphitheater, shade structures, lookout points, trails, bridge crossings, interpretive signs, bioretention/biofiltration areas, and connection to Ronald Reagan Elementary School. A potential future fire station is also considered, although it is unknown at this time whether the fire station will be feasible at this location. Figure 4, Conceptual Site Plan, shows the locations of these uses on the project site. The proposed development plans, including architectural renderings, are provided in Appendix 1.

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:

ADJACENT LAND USE, LAND USE DESIGNATION, AND ZONING
Location Current Land Use
General Plan Land Use
Designation Zoning
North
Vacant Land and Rural
Residential
Very Low Density Residential
(VLDR)
Rural Residential
(R-R)
620
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 27

ADJACENT LAND USE, LAND USE DESIGNATION, AND ZONING
Location Current Land Use
General Plan Land Use
Designation Zoning
South Vacant Land Medium Density Residential
(MDR)
Rural Residential
(R-R)
Southeast School Public Facilities
Rural Residential
(R-R)
East Higher Residential Medium Density Residential
(MDR) Residential (R-1)
West Rural Residential Medium Density Residential
(MDR)
Rural Residential
(R-R)

10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval May Be Required:
• San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
• Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
• California Department of Fish and Wildlife

11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? The City of Wildomar sent notice to tribes on June 5, 2023, that have requested to be notified of projects pursuant to Assembly Bill (AB) 52 Native Americans: California Environmental Quality Act and Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1. The City has completed consultations with Native American Tribes (please refer to section V.18 of the Initial Study, Tribal Cultural Resources). 621
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 28
B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project involving at least one impact that is “Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry
Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazardous and Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology/Water
Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities and Service
Systems
Wildfire Mandatory Findings of
Significance
622
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 29
C. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because of the incorporated mitigation measures and revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

City Representative
Matthew C. Bassi, Community Development
Director
Date
Applicant
Pursuant to Section 15070(b)(1) of the California Environmental Quality Act, as the project applicant, I agree to revisions of the project plans or proposals as described in this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration to avoid or reduce environmental impacts of my project to a less than significant level.

Dan York, City Manager Date
08/09/2023
08/09/2023
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2DAB6222-15E8-48C6-9D9F-EB5B3046D850 623
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 30
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

1. Aesthetics
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista?

b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
state scenic highway?

c) In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade
the existing visual character or quality of public
views of the site and its surroundings? (Public
views are those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage point). If the project
is in an urbanized area, would the project
conflict with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?

d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare
which would adversely affect day or nighttime
views in the area?


DISCUSSION
a) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would result in the development of a 27-acre park with various amenities. The average elevation across the site is 1,444 feet above mean sea level (amsl).

Scenic vistas in the project vicinity include mountain ridgelinesto the north, west, and south of the project site ranging from approximately 4,000 feet amsl to 10,000 feet amsl. The project site is bordered by higher density residential uses to the east, rural residential uses and vacant land to the north, vacant land directly south with residential uses further south, Ronald Reagan Elementary School to the southeast, and rural residential uses to the west. The view of these hills may be altered by construction of the proposed structures for the residential uses surrounding the project site. However, the proposed structures are two stories or less, and would not fully obstruct any scenic view or resource. Views of the surrounding ridgelines would not be obstructed from off-site viewpoints. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, and this impact would be less than significant.
624
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 31
b) No Impact. There are no State Scenic Highways proximate to the project site. The nearest officially designated State Scenic Highway is the portion of State Route 74 (SR-74) that runs through San Bernardino National Forest, which is approximately 25 miles northeast of the project site (Caltrans 2022). I-15 is an eligible scenic highway but is not designated as such. Additionally, the proposed project would not require the removal of any tree, rock outcropping, or historic building within a State Scenic Highway. Therefore, there are no impacts to scenic resources within a State Scenic Highway. c) Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is bordered by higher density residential uses to the east, rural residential uses and vacant land to the north, vacant land directly south with residential uses further south, Ronald Reagan Elementary School to the southeast, and rural residential uses to the west.

The proposed community center building would be 26 feet and 2 inches tall and include grey roofing with yellow siding. The proposed fire station would be one- to two-stories tall with a maximum height of 41 feet and would have red/brown roof and siding. The proposed picnic pavilion would be 22 feet 7 inches tall and consist of wood and grey shingles. Other structures on the project site would include shade structure, which would be tan in color, and the hilltop climb and play areas would be constructed out of wood and metal materials.

The proposed project would be consistent with the City of Wildomar Parks Master Plan, which was adopted in March 2015. Chapter 3, Parks Standards, of this Plan identifies standards for park facilities, including park amenities (e.g., benches, play equipment, and sports fields); and minimum number and design standards for the size, layout, and orientation of each park amenity. The proposed project is categorized as a community park (15-40 acres), which is the City’s largest park type, because the proposed park would be 27 acres. Table 3.B: Quantity of Park Amenities by Park Type, of the Plan identifies specific design standards for amenities in parks, including design specifications for paths; number of benches, tables, shade structures, sports fields; and size of play areas.

Development of the proposed project would be required to comply with the City’s design guidelines and development standards identified in the City’s General Plan, Parks Master Plan, and Municipal Code. If the project is consistent with the design standards, then it will not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. The City Council will determine consistency and can establish requirements for the proposed project to ensure compliance with the design standards. The project would be consistent with the standards of the Rural Residential Zone as shown in Chapter

17.16.020, Rural Residential Zone, of the Wildomar Municipal Code, which allows public parks with the approval of a plot plan, and restricts building heights of non-residential structures to 50 feet. The City does not have any additional regulations regarding scenic quality. This impact is less than significant. d) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would result in new and increased sources of nighttime lighting and illumination including lighting within the parking areas, and lights associated with vehicular travel. Security lighting, pedestrian pathway lighting, street lighting, and landscape lights would also be added throughout the park to provide safety. Chapter 8.64, Light Pollution, of the Wildomar Municipal Code, establishes limits on the types of fixtures and size of bulbs used in all aspects of development. The proposed project is required to comply with this ordinance, which is verified as part of the building permit application process and again during building and site inspections of the site to ensure 625
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 32
that the project’s lighting would not create significant impacts. Consistent with the City’s lighting standards (Wildomar Municipal Code Section 8.64.090), all proposed exterior light fixtures must have full cutoff so that there is no light pollution created above the 90‐degree plane of the light fixtures. The project would not adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area, and the project would not contribute to night sky pollution. Therefore, this impact is less than significant.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

1. The project is required to comply with the provisions of Wildomar Municipal Code Chapter 8.64, Light Pollution.

MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
626
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 33

2. Agriculture and Forestry Resources
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in
assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In
determining whether impacts to forest resources,
including timberland, are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and
the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols
adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would
the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than Significant
Impact with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland),
as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to
the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to
non-agricultural use?

b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use, or a Williamson Act contract?

c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland
(as defined by Public Resources Code Section
4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code
Section 51104(g))?

d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of
forest land to non-forest use?

e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of Farmland,
to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?

627
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 34

DISCUSSION
a) No Impact. This site is not designated under the State Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, nor is the site adjacent to such designations. The site is designated under the class “Other Land,” which describes a land use that is vacant and nonagricultural surrounded by urban development (Department of Transportation, 2023). The project site is bordered by higher density residential uses to the east, rural residential uses and vacant land to the north, vacant land directly south with residential uses further south, Ronald Reagan Elementary School to the southeast, and rural residential uses to the west. The project would not result in the conversion of agricultural lands, and therefore no impact would occur. b) No Impact. The project site is not zoned for agricultural use by the City, nor are there any Williamson Act contracts on the project site (CDC 2023). Therefore, no impact would occur. c) No Impact. The project site is not designated as forestland or timberland by the City, and there is no forestland or timberland adjacent to these sites. The project site is designated under the class “Other Land,” which describes a land use that is vacant and nonagricultural surrounded by urban development.

The project site is bordered by higher density residential uses to the east, rural residential uses and vacant land to the north, vacant land directly south with residential uses further south, Ronald Reagan Elementary School to the southeast, and rural residential uses to the west. Therefore, no impact would occur.
d) No Impact. The project site does not contain forestland, nor is the project site zoned as forestland by the City. Implementation of the proposed project would not convert forestland to non-forest use or result in a loss of forestland. Therefore, no impact would occur. e) No Impact. The project site does not contain forestland or unique farmland. The project site is bordered by higher density residential uses to the east, rural residential uses and vacant land to the north, vacant land directly south with residential uses further south, Ronald Reagan Elementary School to the southeast, and rural residential uses to the west. Development on the site would not result in the conversion of farmland to nonagricultural uses or forestland to non-forest uses. As such, no impact would occur.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
None required.

MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
628
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 35

3. Air Quality
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?

b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?

c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?

d) Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?

An Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment was prepared by PlaceWorks (PlaceWorks 2023), on June 29, 2023 (see Appendix 2).

DISCUSSION
a) Less Than Significant Impact. Pollutants emitted into the ambient air by stationary and mobile sources are regulated by federal and State law under the National and California Clean Air Act, respectively. Air pollutants are categorized as primary and/or secondary pollutants. Primary air pollutants are those that are emitted directly from sources. Carbon monoxide (CO), reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse inhalable particulate matter (PM10), fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5), and lead (Pb) are primary air pollutants. Of these, all of them except for VOCs are “criteria air pollutants,” which means that ambient air quality standards (AAQS) have been established for them. The National AAQS (NAAQS) and California AAQS (CAAQS) are the levels of air quality considered to provide a margin of safety in the protection of the public health and welfare. They are designed to protect those “sensitive receptors” most susceptible to further respiratory distress, such as asthmatics, the elderly, very young children, people already weakened by other disease or illness, and persons engaged in strenuous work or exercise. Healthy adults can tolerate occasional exposure to air pollutant concentrations considerably above these minimum standards before adverse effects are observed.

The project site is in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD). The South Coast AQMD is required, pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act, to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the basin is in nonattainment:
629
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 36
ozone (O3), coarse particulate matter (PM10), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). An area designated as nonattainment for an air pollutant is an area that does not achieve the National or California AAQS for that pollutant.

To reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the SoCAB is in nonattainment, the South Coast AQMD has adopted the 2022 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The 2022 AQMP establishes a program of rules and regulations directed at reducing air pollutant emissions and achieving state (California) and national air quality standards. The 2022 AQMP is a regional and multi-agency effort including the South Coast AQMD, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The 2022 AQMP pollutant control strategies are based on the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including SCAG’s 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories, and SCAG’s latest growth forecasts, defined in consultation with local governments and with reference to local general plans. The project is subject to the South Coast AQMD’s AQMP.

Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are defined by the following indicators:
• Consistency Criterion No. 1: The proposed project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP.
• Consistency Criterion No. 2: The proposed project will not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the years of project buildout phase.

Consistency Criterion 1
Consistency Criterion No. 1 refers to violations of the CAAQS and NAAQS. CAAQS and NAAQS violations would occur if Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) or regional significance thresholds were exceeded.

As indicated under Impacts b and c, short-term construction and long-term operational emissions would not result in significant impacts based on the South Coast AQMD regional significance thresholds or LSTs.

Therefore, the proposed project is determined to be consistent with the first criterion, and impacts would be less than significant.

Consistency Criterion 2
The 2022 AQMP demonstrates that the applicable ambient air quality standards can be achieved within the timeframes required under federal law. Growth projections from local general plans adopted by cities in South Coast AQMD’s jurisdiction are provided to the SCAG, which develops regional growth forecasts, which are then used to develop future air quality forecasts for the AQMP. Therefore, development that is consistent with the growth projections in City of Wildomar General Plan is considered to be consistent with the AQMP.

The City’s General Plan designates the project site as Medium Density Residential (MDR) and the site has a zoning designation of Rural Residential (R-R). The proposed project is a 27-acre park that features a community building, fire station, parking lot, and several recreational amenities. Development of the site 630
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 37
as a park is consistent with uses allowed under the R-R zone and City’s 2015 Parks Master Plan. Use of the site as a park would not generate any direct population growth and would likely generate fewer operational criteria air pollutant emissions than would be experienced with full development allowed under the MDR designation, which allows two to five single-family dwelling units per acre. Therefore, as the proposed project would be consistent with the City’s existing land use designations and growth projections, the proposed project is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP growth assumptions and would be consistent with the second criterion. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. b) Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is in SoCAB. State and federal air quality standards are often exceeded in many parts of the basin. A discussion of the project’s potential short-term constructionperiod and long-term operational-period air quality impacts are provided below.

Construction Emissions
Construction activities associated with the project would result in emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), NOX, CO, SO2, PM10, and PM2.5. Emissions would result from site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. A quantified analysis of the proposed project’s construction emissions was conducted using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2022.1 based on information provided by the City and default equipment mix for each construction phase. While the construction schedule for the project has not yet been determined, for the purposes of modeling, construction was assumed to start in January of 2024 and last 16 months until May 2025, based on the default assumptions in the model. As shown in Table 3-1, Project Construction Regional Pollutant Emissions Summary, maximum daily emissions resulting from project construction would not exceed the maximum daily pollutant thresholds established by South Coast AQMD for emissions of any criteria pollutant. Therefore, criteria pollutant emissions generated during construction of the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. Impacts would be less than significant.

Table 3-1 Project Construction Regional Pollutant Emissions Summary Activity Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Site Preparation
On-Site1 3.65 36.02 32.91 0.05 10.32 5.52
Off-Site2 0.09 0.65 1.01 0.00 0.29 0.08
Subtotal 3.74 36.67 33.92 0.05 10.61 5.60
Grading
On-Site1 3.52 34.33 30.21 0.06 6.23 2.87
Off-Site2 0.11 0.72 1.14 0.00 0.33 0.09
Subtotal 3.63 35.05 31.35 0.06 6.56 2.96
Building
Construction (2024)
On-Site1 1.20 11.20 13.10 0.02 0.50 0.46
Off-Site2 0.02 0.06 0.18 0.01 0.04 0.02
Subtotal 1.22 11.26 13.28 0.03 0.54 0.48
Building On-Site1 1.13 10.40 13.00 0.02 0.43 0.40
631
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 38
Construction (2025) Off-Site2 0.02 0.05 0.17 0.01 0.04 0.02 Subtotal 1.15 10.45 13.17 0.03 0.47 0.42
Paving
On-Site1 1.67 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 0.32
Off-Site2 0.06 0.05 0.84 0.00 0.14 0.03
Subtotal 1.73 7.50 10.82 0.01 0.49 0.35
Architectural
Coating
On-Site1 14.23 0.88 1.14 0.00 0.03 0.03
Off-Site2 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00
Subtotal 14.23 0.88 1.17 0.00 0.04 0.03
Total for Overlapping Phases3 17.11 18.84 25.16 0.04 1.01 0.80 South Coast AQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
1 On-site emissions from equipment operated on-site that is not operated on public roads. On-site grading PM10 and PM2.5 emissions show reduced values for fugitive dust for compliance with South Coast AQMD Rule 403. 2 Offsite emissions from equipment operated on public roads. 3 Building construction (2025), architectural coating, and paving phases may overlap.

Source: PlaceWorks 2023 (Appendix 2)
Operational Emissions
Operational activities associated with the proposed project would result in emissions of VOCs, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10, and PM2.5. Operational emissions would be expected from area sources, energy sources, and mobile sources.

As shown in Table 3-2, Summary of Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions, the proposed project’s maximum daily emissions from on-going operations would not exceed the South Coast AQMD’s regional significance thresholds. Therefore, criteria pollutant emissions generated during operation of the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for 632
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 39
which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. Impacts would be less than significant.

Table 3-2 Summary of Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions Activity Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Area Source1 0.55 0.61 5.20 0.01 1.10 0.29
Energy Usage2 0.74 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mobile Source3 0.01 0.16 0.14 0.00 0.01 0.01
Total Emissions 1.30 0.77 5.72 0.01 1.11 0.30
South Coast AQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
1 Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. 2 Energy usage consists of emissions from generation of electricity and on-site natural gas usage. 3 Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust.

Source: PlaceWorks 2023 (Appendix 2)
c) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutants.

LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that would not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable NAAQS and CAAQA at the nearest location where an individual can be expected to remain for 24 hours.

Localized Construction Impacts
Table 3-3, Project Localized Construction Emissions, identifies the localized impacts at the nearest receptor locations in the vicinity of the project. None of the analyzed criteria pollutants would not exceed the applicable South Coast AQMD LSTs for localized construction emissions.

Table 3-3 Project Localized Construction Emissions
Construction Activity Emissions (lbs/day)
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Site Preparation 36.02 32.91 10.32 5.52
Grading 34.33 30.21 6.23 2.87
Building Construction (2024) 11.20 13.10 0.50 0.46
Building Construction (2025) 10.40 13.00 0.43 0.40
Paving 7.45 9.98 0.35 0.32
Architectural Coating 0.88 1.14 0.03 0.03
Total for Overlapping Phases1 18.73 24.12 0.81 0.75
South Coast AQMD Localized
Threshold2
371 1,965 13 8
Exceeds Threshold? NO NO NO NO
633
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 40
Source: PlaceWorks 2023 (Appendix 2)
1 Building construction (2025), architectural coating, and paving phases may overlap. 2 Localized significance thresholds correspond to with SRA 25 on a 5-acre site at 25 meters.

Localized Operational Impacts
Table 3-4, Project Localized Operational Emissions, shows the on-site emissions from the CalEEMod model that includes natural gas usage, landscape maintenance equipment, and vehicles operating on-site, and the calculated emissions thresholds. To account for on-site vehicle activity, a separate on-site mobile source only operational model was prepared to account for the approximately 0.2-mile distance that vehicles would travel on-site to access parking facilities. As shown in Table 3-4, the operational activity of the proposed project would not exceed South Coast AQMD’s operational LSTs. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant.

Table 3-4 Project Localized Operational Emissions
Construction Activity Emissions (lbs/day)
NOX CO PM10 PM2.5
Area Sources1 0.01 0.38 0.01 0.01
Energy Usage2 0.16 0.14 0.01 0.01
Vehicle Emissions3 0.12 0.88 0.02 0.01
Total Emissions 0.29 1.40 0.04 0.03
South Coast AQMD Localized
Threshold4
371 1,965 4 2
Exceeds Threshold? NO NO NO NO
Source: PlaceWorks 2023 (Appendix 2)
1 Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. 2 Energy usage consists of emissions from on-site natural gas usage. 3 On-site vehicular emissions based on a 0.2-mile travel distance. 4 Localized significance thresholds correspond to with SRA 25 on a 5-acre site at 25 meters.

Carbon Monoxide Hotspots
CO attainment in the South Coast Air Basin by the South Coast AQMD was analyzed as part of the South Coast AQMD’s 2003 AQMP and the 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide. As part of the 1992 CO Plan, an analysis for CO “hot spots,” adverse CO concentrations, was conducted for four intersections in Los Angeles at the peak morning and afternoon time periods. This hot spot analysis did not predict any violation of CO standards. The busiest intersection evaluated was that at Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue, which has a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day.

As further discussed in Section V.17, Transportation, the proposed project would generate an average of approximately 118 daily vehicle trips. The intersection with the highest traffic volume near the project 634
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 41
site is Wildomar Trail at La Estrella Street, which experiences up to an estimated 5,228 average vehicles daily. The 1992 CO Plan showed that an intersection which has a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day would not violate the CO standard. Accounting for the project-generation vehicle trips and assuming they all would drive through the intersection of Wildomar Trail at La Estrella Street, this intersection would experience an estimated 5,346 daily vehicles on weekdays. Therefore, as the traffic volumes at nearby intersections resulting from traffic generated by the proposed project would fall short of the 100,000 vehicles per day, no CO hotspot modeling was performed, and no significant long-term air quality impact is anticipated. Therefore, project impacts associated with CO hot spots are less than significant.

Toxic Air Contaminants (TAC)

CONSTRUCTION TAC IMPACTS
The greatest potential for TAC emissions during construction would be related to diesel particulate emissions associated with the operation of heavy equipment. Given the temporary and short-term construction schedule for the proposed project, the proposed project would not result in a long-term (i.e., lifetime or 30-year) exposure as a result of project construction. Furthermore, construction-based particulate matter (PM) emissions, including diesel exhaust emissions, do not exceed any local or regional thresholds and the nearest sensitive receptors to the project site, students and employees of the Ronald Reagan Elementary School play fields, are located adjacent to the southern and eastern boundaries of the project site. Moreover, most of the construction activity would occur in the interior of the project site away from the southern boundary shared by the Ronald Reagan Elementary School play fields. The proposed project would be required to comply with CARB Air Toxics Control Measure that limits diesel powered equipment and vehicle idling to no more than 5 minutes at a location, and the CARB In-Use OffRoad Diesel Vehicle Regulation. Compliance with these regulations would minimize TAC emissions during construction. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant.

OPERATIONAL TAC IMPACTS
Operation of the proposed project would not generate substantial TAC emissions from on-site stationary sources. Land uses that have the potential to generate substantial stationary sources of emissions include industrial land uses, such as chemical processing and warehousing operations where truck idling would occur on-site and would require a permit from South Coast AQMD. The proposed project would constitute the operation of a community building, fire station, and supporting park amenities and would include a land use that generates substantial TAC emissions. Therefore, TAC impacts related to operation-related emissions would be less than significant.
d) Less Than Significant Impact. The potential for the proposed project to generate objectionable odors has also been considered. Land uses generally associated with odor complaints include: Agricultural uses (livestock and farming)
• Wastewater treatment plants
• Food processing plants
635
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 42
• Chemicals plants
• Composting operations
• Refineries
• Landfills
• Dairies
• Fiberglass molding facilities
The proposed project involves the construction and operation of a park which does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors. Potential odor sources associated with the proposed project may result from construction equipment exhaust and VOCs and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities. Standard construction requirements would minimize odor impacts from construction. The construction odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of construction and is therefore considered less than significant. It is expected that project-generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in compliance with the City’s solid waste regulations. The proposed project would also be required to comply with South Coast AQMD Rule 402 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. Therefore, odors associated with the proposed project construction and operational activities would be less than significant.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

1. Compliance with South Coast AQMD Rules including 402, 403, and 1113.

MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
636
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 43

4. Biological Resources
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Impact
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of
Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?

b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies,
regulations or by the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?

c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?

d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species
or with established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?

e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?

f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?

ECORP Consulting, Inc. prepared a Biological Technical Report and Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency Analysis in July 2023 for the project, which is included as Appendix 3 (ECORP 2023a).
637
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 44

DISCUSSION
a) Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated.

Special-Status Plant Species
Based on literature review and databases searches, 48 special-status plant species were identified onsite.

Of these, one species, paniculate tarplant, was observed within the project site; however, the species has a California Rare Plant Ranks (CRPR) rank of 4.2 (limited distribution in California) and therefore, impacts to this species is not considered significant. In addition, one species, Coulter’s matilija poppy, was found to have a moderate potential to occur within the project site due to the presence of suitable habitat, however, there are no records of this species occurring within 5 miles of the project site. This species is an MSHCP-covered species and has a CRPR of 4.2. Therefore, additional surveys are not required. The remaining 46 species were determined to have a low potential to occur onsite or were presumed absent.

No additional plant species were observed onsite. Therefore, impacts to special-status plant or narrow endemic plant species would be less than significant.

Special-Status Wildlife Species
Of the 32 special-status wildlife species identified in the literature search, one bird species was present north of the project site, within the 500-foot survey buffer––Coastal California Gnatcatcher (federally listed threatened species and California Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW] Species of Special Concern [SSC]). Suitable sage scrub habitat for this sensitive bird species occurs within the project site.

This species is covered under the MSHCP, and therefore, no additional surveys or mitigation would be required. As the project site is not located within a Criteria Area or Public Quasi-Public (PQP) lands, there are no seasonal limitations for clearing of suitable gnatcatcher habitat within the project site. The proposed project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure BIO-1 which requires a preconstruction nesting bird survey to be conducted prior to site disturbance.

Two special status wildlife species were determined to have a high potential to occur within the project site––Burrowing Owl and northwestern San Diego pocket mouse. The San Diego pocket mouse is covered under the MSHCP and no additional surveys or mitigation would be required. The project site is located within a designated survey area under the MSHCP for Burrowing Owl, and the biological surveys determined that suitable Burrowing Owl habitat was present on the project site. Mitigation Measure BIO2 would require protocol-level surveys for Burrowing Owl to determine the presence/absence of the species.

If burrowing owls and/or suitable burrowing owl burrows with signs (e.g., whitewash, pellets, feathers, prey remains) are identified in the project area during the survey and impacts to those features are unavoidable, then additional avoidance and minimization measures will need to be implemented to avoid impacts as a result of the proposed project in accordance with CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. Additional avoidance and minimization measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist and will include non-disturbance buffers established around active burrows, seasonal work restrictions, or additional survey and monitoring requirements. If the qualified biologist determines that development 638
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 45
of a Burrowing Owl Management Plan is necessary, the qualified biologist will outline additional protection and avoidance and minimization measures specific to burrowing owl. If proposed projectrelated impacts to burrowing owl are unavoidable even after implementing additional avoidance and minimization measures, then coordination with CDFW will need to occur to discuss the implementation of additional mitigation requirements such as passive relocation.

Seven special status wildlife species were determined to have moderate potential to occur within the project site. Crotch bumble bee has a moderate potential to occur onsite and is listed as a Candidate Species under the California Endangered Species Act. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-3 would be required to determine the presence/absence of this species within the project site. Five of the special status wildlife species with moderate potential to occur are covered by the MSHCP: Bell’s sage sparrow, loggerhead shrike, red-diamond rattlesnake, San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit, and southern California rufous-crowned sparrow. These five species are considered adequately conserved under the MSHCP; no additional surveys or mitigation would be required. California glossy snake has a moderate potential to occur onsite and is a CDFW SSC. Direct and indirect impacts from construction may affect this species.

However, if this species were to be present within the project site, they would likely occur in low numbers due to anthropogenic disturbances and lack of connectivity on the project site, and project-related impacts would not contribute to the overall decline of populations of this species. Therefore, impacts to California glossy snake would be less than significant.

The remaining 22 special status wildlife species analyzed were determined to have a low potential to occur or are presumed absent due to lack of suitable habitat occurring within the project site. Therefore, impacts to these species are not expected to occur.
b) No Impact. Riparian/riverine areas are lands which contain habitat dominated by trees, shrubs, persistent emergent vegetation, or emergent mosses and lichens, which occur close to, or which depend upon soil moisture from nearby freshwater sources, or areas with freshwater flow during all or a portion of the year. While small patches of willows, mulefat, and cottonwoods are present onsite, these plant species were not extensive enough to call out as their own plant community. As such, no sensitive natural communities were observed on the project site or within a 500-foot radius of the site (ECORP 2023a).

Therefore, no impacts would occur.
c) Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. According to the Biological Technical Report, one drainage within the project site was identified using the National Wetlands Inventory, and two potential drainage features were identified based on a desktop review of aerial imagery. As part of the proposed project’s design, bridges would be installed to reduce impacts to drainage features/wetlands, and appropriate best management practices (BMPs) would be implemented, such as landscaping, jute bales, etc. to reduce impacts to drainage features/wetlands. While the intent is to avoid the drainage features/wetlands through the project design features, Mitigation Measure BIO-4 and Mitigation Measure BIO-5, which require the preparation of a formal Aquatic Resource Delineation and Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation, respectively, have been included in an overabundance of caution in case the project design needs to change. Mitigation BIO-4 and Mitigation 639
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 46
BIO-5 would reduce impacts to the drainages onsite. Therefore, impacts would be mitigated to less than significant.
d) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Wildlife corridors refer to established migration routes commonly used by resident and migratory species for passage from one geographic location to another. Movement corridors may provide favorable locations for wildlife to travel between different habitat areas, such as foraging sites, breeding sites, cover areas, and preferred summer and winter range locations. They may also function as dispersal corridors allowing animals to move between various locations within their range.

The project site likely provides local wildlife movement opportunities because it consists of open land and there are undeveloped parcels to the north and south of the project site. The large eucalyptus trees and other ornamental trees located within or near the project site could provide nesting habitat for nesting birds and raptors protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code.

Ground-disturbing construction activities could directly affect nesting birds and other birds protected by the MBTA and their nests through habitat removal within the project site, and indirectly through increased noise, vibrations, and increased human activity if any tree or vegetation removal needs to occur during the bird breeding season (typically January 15 through August 31).

Disturbing or destroying active nests is a violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). In addition, nests and eggs are protected under California Fish and Wildlife Code Section 3503. To comply with the MBTA and California Fish and Wildlife Code, implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO‐1 would ensure raptors and other nesting bird species that may or may not be covered under the MSHCP would be protected. Impacts would be less than significant with the implementation of mitigation. e) Less Than Significant Impact. The City Wildomar Municipal Code Section 12.08.050, regulates trees within the public right of way. The project site contains no trees within a public right-of-way; however, trees may be planted to the public right-of-way as part of the proposed project. The proposed project would be required to comply with Wildomar Municipal Code Section 12.08.050. There are no other city policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. f) Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The Western Riverside MSHCP is a habitat conservation plan and natural community conservation plan to which the City of Wildomar is a permittee (i.e., signatory). The project site is located in the Elsinore Area Plan of the MSHCP, but is not located in a Criteria Cell. Since the site is not located in a Criteria Cell, there are no conservation requirements on the property.

The Biological Technical Report indicates that project site is not within a Criteria Area Species Survey Area or Cell Group, nor a Public Quasi-Public Lands. The MSHCP riparian/riverine resources within the project site provide some biological functions due to the presence of native habitat in some areas, however; lowquality, disturbed habitat dominated by non-native vegetation is also present onsite. Therefore, the MSHCP riparian/riverine resources do not support or provide habitat for MSHCP Section 6.1.2 species.

Additionally, it was determined that suitable breeding and foraging habitat for Western Yellow-Billed Cuckoo, Least Bell’s Vireo, and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher were not present on the project site. 640
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 47
Therefore, impacts to MSHCP Section 6.1.2 species would not occur. Other Section 6.1.2 plant and wildlife species were assessed for their potential to occur, and no impacts are expected to occur.

The project site is not located within a Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area in accordance with Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP. Therefore, no impacts would occur. Moreover, the project site was analyzed to determine if additional surveys and procedures were needed, pursuant to Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP.

The project site is not located within a mapped survey area for MSHCP Criteria Area plant species and no MSHCP amphibian species were mapped onsite. However, the project site is within the MSHCP Survey Area for Burrowing Owl, and a Burrowing Owl habitat assessment was conducted. Therefore, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 would be required to reduce impacts to less than significant.

Additionally, the project site is not located within a mapped area for MSHCP mammal species, Delhi soils, and no MSHCP Table 9-3 species were observed. The project site is not located adjacent to and does not have onsite connection to existing conservation or land described for conservation and the project site is not within an Urban/Wildlands Interface pursuant to Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP.

Coastal California Gnatcatcher was heard within the native scrub habitat located north of the project site, within the 500-foot survey area. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would reduce impacts to less than significant.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

1. The City of Wildomar will pay fees, as applicable to this type of project, in conformance Title 3, Revenue and Finance, of the Wildomar Municipal Code. Such fees may include the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan fees and Stephen’s Kangaroo Rat Conservation fees.

MITIGATION MEASURES
BIO-1 All ground-disturbing activities shall be conducted during the nonbreeding season for birds (approximately September 1 through January 14) to the greatest extent possible.

This will avoid violations of the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3503.5 and 3513. If activities with the potential to disrupt nesting birds are scheduled to occur during the bird breeding season (January 15 through August 31), a preconstruction survey for nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist who is experienced in the identification of avian species and conducting nesting bird surveys. The nesting survey shall include the project site and adjacent areas where project activities have the potential to cause nest failure. The preconstruction survey shall be conducted no more than 3 days prior to the start of ground-disturbing activities within the bird breeding season. If no nesting birds are observed during the survey, site preparation and construction activities may begin. If nesting birds (including nesting raptors) are found to be present, avoidance or minimization measures shall be implemented to avoid potential Project-related impacts. Measures shall include, but are not limited to, establishment of an avoidance buffer until nesting has been completed and periodic nest monitoring by the Project biologist until the juveniles have fledged and there has been no evidence of a 641
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 48
second attempt at nesting. The width of the avoidance buffer will be determined by the Project biologist. The monitoring biologist will monitor the nest(s) during construction and document any findings. Once nesting is deemed complete by the Project biologist, work may resume within the avoidance buffer area.

Timing/Implementation: Within three (3) days prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing work
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Community Development Department BIO-2 A preconstruction survey for Burrowing Owl shall be conducted within the project site and adjacent areas within 30 days prior to the start of ground-disturbing activities. The surveys shall follow the methods described in the Western Riverside MSHCP Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions. If burrowing owls and/or suitable burrowing owl burrows with signs (e.g., whitewash, pellets, feathers, prey remains) are identified in the project area during the survey and impacts to those features are unavoidable, then additional avoidance and minimization measures will need to be implemented to avoid impacts as a result of the proposed project in accordance with CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. Additional avoidance and minimization measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist and will include non-disturbance buffers established around active burrows, seasonal work restrictions, or additional survey and monitoring requirements. If the qualified biologist determines that development of a Burrowing Owl Management Plan is necessary, the qualified biologist will outline additional protection and avoidance and minimization measures specific to burrowing owl. If proposed project-related impacts to burrowing owl are unavoidable even after implementing additional avoidance and minimization measures, then coordination with CDFW will need to occur to discuss the implementation of additional mitigation requirements such as passive relocation.

Timing/Implementation: Within 30 days prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing work Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Community Development Department BIO-3 Due to the presence of suitable habitat, a focused survey for Crotch bumble bee, a California ESA Candidate species, shall be conducted prior to the start of grounddisturbing activities to determine the presence or absence of the species within the project site. If the species is observed within the project site and project-related impacts are unavoidable, then additional mitigation or avoidance and minimization measures will be implemented, and the proposed project will need to obtain the necessary permits and authorizations from CDFW (i.e., Incidental Take Permit under Section 2081 of the California ESA). Additional avoidance and minimization measures will include habitat preservation, compensatory mitigation through the purchase and conservation of habitat within its range, non-disturbance buffers around nest locations, biological monitoring requirements, and/or seasonal work restrictions.

Timing/Implementation: Prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing work Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Community Development Department 642
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 49
BIO-4 A formal Aquatic Resource Delineation shall be prepared prior to the start of construction activities to determine if the drainage features within the project site contain aquatic resources jurisdictional to the US Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control Board, or California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and to determine the acreage of MSHCP Riparian/Riverine resources present onsite. California Department of Fish and Wildlife and Regional Water Quality Control Board jurisdictional waters are regulated by state and local governments under a no-net-loss policy, and all impacts are considered significant and shall be avoided to the greatest extent possible.

Impacts to jurisdictional waters require mitigation through habitat creation, restoration, or enhancement as determined by consultation with the regulatory agencies during the permitting process. Any impacts to California Department of Fish and Wildlife jurisdiction would require a Section 1602 SAA from California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Any impacts to Waters of the U.S. would require a Section 404 permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers. Impacts to Waters of the U.S. will require a Section 404 permit and will qualify for a Nationwide Permit 14 authorization from the United States Army Corps of Engineers. Any impacts to Waters of the U.S. or State will also require a 401 Certification or Waste Discharge Requirements from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Timing/Implementation: Prior to the initiation of construction activities Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Community Development Department BIO-5 A Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation shall be prepared prior to the start of construction activities, in conjunction with the Aquatic Resource Delineation, to address proposed impacts to MSHCP Riparian/Riverine resources located within the project site. Impacts to MSHCP Riparian/Riverine resources will require mitigation to be approved by the Wildlife Agencies (CDFW and USFWS).

Timing/Implementation: Prior to the initiation of construction activities Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Community Development Department 643
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 50

5. Cultural Resources
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
Section 15064.5?

b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to Section 15064.5?

c) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?

An Archaeological Resources Inventory Report was prepared for the proposed project by ECORP Consulting, Inc. in July 2023, and is included as Appendix 4 (ECORP 2023b).

DISCUSSION
a) No Impact. Section 15064.5 defines historic resources as resources listed or determined to be eligible for listing by the State Historical Resources Commission, a local register of historical resources, or lead agency. Generally, a resource is considered to be “historically significant” if it meets one of the following criteria:
i. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage;
ii. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; iii. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or iv. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

The project site is vacant and does not contain any structures. An irrigation feature on the western side of the project site, comprising of a small concrete foundation, two plastic PVC pipes, larger metal pipe, and a T-shaped stand were encountered. The earliest aerial photographs potentially depicting these resources are from 1978. Data from existing available record searches and the field survey did not yield any historic-period or pre-contact cultural resources within the project site (ECORP 2023b). As there are no structures or eligible historic resources on the site, there is no impact. b) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Archaeological resources are historic evidence of past human activities, including structural ruins and buried resources. 644
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 51
The Archaeological Resources Inventory Report indicated that a moderate potential for buried precontact archaeological sites exist within the project site due to the presence of the drainage in the western portion of the project site and Iodine Springs, approximately 0.5-mile northeast of the site, along the same drainage.

Implementation of Mitigation Measures TRI-1 through TRI-8 (see V. 19, Tribal Cultural Resources) would ensure that any archaeological resources discovered on the project site would be properly managed by having a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction and grading activities, complying with provisions outlined in the Tribal Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement, and halting construction within 100 feet of discovered resources in the event that they are uncovered. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
c) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Construction activities associated with project implementation would require grading and excavation of the site below the surface. Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 70520.5, in the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains on the site, no further excavation or disturbance of the site shall be permitted until the coroner of the county is contacted and has conducted an investigation into the circumstances, manner, and cause of any death, and recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for the excavation, or to his or her authorized representative. If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner recognizes or has reason to believe the human remains to be those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission. The project would comply with existing law, and potential impacts to human remains is less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures CUL-1, TRI-7, and TRI-8.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
None required.

MITIGATION MEASURES
CUL-1 Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted within the period specified by law (24 hours). Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the "most likely descendant." The most likely descendant shall then make recommendations and engage in consultation concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.

Timing/Implementation: During any ground-disturbing construction activities 645
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 52
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
646
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 53

6. Energy
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of energy resources,
during project construction or operation?

b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?

a) Less Than Significant Impact.

Short Term Construction Impacts
During construction, the project would consume energy in two general forms: (1) the fuel energy consumed by construction vehicles and equipment; and (2) bound energy in construction materials, such as asphalt, steel, concrete, pipes, and manufactured or processed materials such as lumber and glass.

Development of the proposed project would create temporary increased demands for electricity during construction. Construction of the proposed project would require the use of construction equipment for grading, hauling, and building activities. Electricity use during construction would vary during different phases of construction—construction equipment during grading would be gas powered or diesel powered, and the later construction phases would require electricity-powered equipment, such as interior construction and architectural coatings. Natural gas is not generally required to power construction equipment and therefore is not anticipated during construction activity. It is anticipated that most electric-powered construction equipment would be hand tools (e.g., power drills, table saws, compressors) and lighting, which would result in minimal electricity usage during construction activities.

Construction also includes the vehicles of construction workers traveling to and from the project site and haul trucks for the export of materials from site clearing.

The construction contractors would minimize idling of construction equipment during construction as required by state law. These required practices would limit wasteful and unnecessary electrical energy consumption. Furthermore, there are no unusual project characteristics that would necessitate the use of construction equipment that is less energy efficient than at comparable construction sites in other parts of the state. Therefore, the proposed short-term construction activities would not result in inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary fuel consumption. Impacts would be less than significant.

TRANSPORTATION
Development of the proposed project would also temporarily increase demands for energy associated with transportation and off-road equipment operation. Transportation energy use depends on the type 647
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 54
and number of trips, vehicle miles traveled, fuel efficiency of vehicles, and travel mode. Transportation energy use during construction would come from the transport and use of construction equipment, delivery vehicles and haul trucks, and construction employee vehicles that would use diesel fuel and/or gasoline.

The use of energy resources by these vehicles would fluctuate according to the phase of construction and would be temporary. Construction equipment during grading would be gas-powered or diesel-powered, and the later construction phases would require electricity-powered equipment. Construction techniques, equipment and materials would be consistent with other construction in the City. Impacts related to transportation energy use during construction would be temporary and would not require expanded energy supplies or the construction of new infrastructure. Furthermore, the construction contractors are anticipated to minimize nonessential idling of construction equipment during construction in accordance with the California Code of Regulations Title 13, Chapter 9, Article 4.8, Section 2449, to limit wasteful and unnecessary energy consumption.

Construction trips would not result in unnecessary use of energy since the project site is served by a major Interstate Highway (I-15) that connects much of the Southern California region, and trips generated during project construction would be necessary to transport construction workers to the project site to construct the proposed project. Therefore, this impact would not be significant.

Long Term Impacts During Operation
Building and site energy use during operation of the proposed project would be associated with electricity and natural gas consumption. Operational use of energy would include heating, cooling, and ventilation of community center building and fire station; water heating; operation of electrical systems, security, and control center functions; use of on-site equipment and appliances; and indoor, outdoor, and parking lot lighting. The park would provide different amenities like a natural playground, a sand volleyball court, and a splash pad area that may require lighting and an electric water pump. Natural gas consumption would result from space and water heating for the community center building and fire station.

Furthermore, the parking lot would have electric vehicle (EV) spaces that would use electricity during operation. Additionally, the proposed project would result in recreational use and would not result in excessive consumption of energy.

ELECTRICITY
The project site is in the service area of Southern California Edison (SCE) and prior to final building plan submittal, the City of Wildomar Public Works Department would provide project plans to (SCE) to prepare a Method-of-Service Study to determine exact location of electrical connections at the site and establish estimated electricity demand. Additionally, because the proposed project would be subject to the more stringent 2022 Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards which require that new buildings reduce water consumption, employ building commissioning to increase building system efficiencies, divert construction waste from landfills, and install low pollutant-emitting finish materials, the project’s electricity demand would not result in significant impacts.
648
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 55
Furthermore, the proposed project would be required to include EV ready spaces consistent with California Green Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 11 (CALGreen) EV charging requirements.

According to Table 5.106.5.3.1, because the proposed project would provide 39 parking spaces associated with nonresidential buildings, the proposed project would be required to provide 2 EV charging spots.

These chargers may be Level 2 or Direct Current Fast Charging (DCFC) chargers.

NATURAL GAS
The project would construct new facilities at the project site that would result in an increase in gas demands. The major use of natural gas on site would be from the community center and fire station. The proposed project would not result in a significant impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation. The surrounding area has natural gas infrastructure provided by the Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). The proposed project would connect to the existing gas lines to the project site.

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED AND FUEL CONSUMPTION
Transportation energy use depends on the type and number of trips, vehicle miles traveled (VMT), fuel efficiency of vehicles, and travel mode. Transportation energy used during operation of the project would come from delivery vehicles, maintenance vehicles, and the general public/refueling vehicles that would primarily use diesel fuel and/or gasoline. The proposed would result in a net increase in annual VMT and therefore would result in an increase in transportation fuel consumption.

Trip generation and VMT generated by the proposed project are consistent with other recreational and fire station uses of similar scale and configuration. In addition, in compliance with CALGreen, the proposed project would include short- and long-term bicycle parking for visitors, employees and regular occupants of nonresidential buildings.

Additionally, fuel efficiency of vehicles would on average improve over time, thereby resulting in an increasingly lower per capita fuel consumption over the lifetime of the project. The improvement in fuel efficiency would be attributable to the statewide fuel reduction strategies and regulatory compliances (e.g., CAFE standards), resulting in new cars that are more fuel efficient and the attrition of older, less fuel-efficient vehicles. The CAFE standards are not directly applicable to land use development projects, but to car manufacturers. Thus, the park users do not have direct control in determining the fuel efficiency of vehicles manufactured and that are made available. However, compliance with the CAFE standards by car manufacturers would ensure that vehicles produced in future years have greater fuel efficiency and would generally result in an overall benefit of reducing fuel usage by providing the population of the project site’s region more fuel-efficient vehicle options.

Moreover, as mentioned above, the proposed project would be required to include EV ready spaces consistent with the 2022 CALGreen requirements. As electricity consumed in California is required to meet the increasing renewable energy mix requirements under the State’s RPS and accelerated by SB 100, greater and greater proportions of electricity consumed for transportation energy demand envisioned under the proposed project would continue to be sourced from renewable energy sources rather than fossil fuels.
649
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 56
These standards and regulations would contribute to minimizing per capita VMT and transportationrelated fuel usage. Therefore, it is expected that operation-related fuel usage associated with the proposed project would not be any more inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary than similar development projects. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with respect to operation-related fuel usage. b) Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Wildomar is within SCAG’s 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), a long‐range visioning plan that balances future mobility and housing needs with economic, environmental, and public health goals.

The RTP/SCS sets forth a development pattern for the region, which, when integrated with the transportation network and other transportation measures and policies, would reduce GHG emissions from transportation (excluding goods movement) by reducing fuel consumption. The RTP/SCS is meant to provide individual jurisdictions with growth strategies that, when taken together, achieve the regional GHG emissions reduction targets. Specifically, the SCS distributes growth forecast data to transportation analysis zones for the purpose of modeling performance. As described in Section V.14, Population and Housing, the proposed project does not exceed the growth projections described in SCAG’s RTP/SCS. The proposed project would not obstruct the implementation of the RTP/SCS.

The proposed project would be subject to the most recent version of the California Energy Code, which sets standards that improve energy efficiency of newly constructed buildings. Additionally, all contractors and waste haulers are required to comply with the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan, which requires a minimum diversion of 50 percent of waste/project materials from being disposed.

The State’s electricity grid is transitioning to renewable energy under California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) Program. Eligible renewable sources under the RPS include wind, small hydropower, solar, geothermal, biomass, and biogas. The RPS goals have been updated since adoption of SB 1078 in 2002. In general, California has RPS requirements of 33 percent renewable energy by 2020 (SB X1-2), 40 percent by 2024 (SB 350), 50 percent by 2026 (SB 100), 60 percent by 2030 (SB 100), 90 percent by 2035 (SB 1020), and 100 percent carbon free by 2045 (SB 100 and SB 1020).

The statewide RPS requirements do not directly apply to individual development projects but to utilities and energy providers such as SCE, whose compliance with RPS requirements would contribute to the State’s objective of transitioning to renewable energy. As previously stated, the proposed project would be required to comply with the current Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CALGreen, which may include requirements for rooftop solar, depending on the building designs and code compliance approach performed for the proposed buildings. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of California’s RPS program or other plans or policies adopted for renewable energy and energy efficiency. This impact would be less than significant.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
None required.

MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
650
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 57

7. Geology and Soils
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.

ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?

iv) Landslides? 
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?

c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in
on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?

d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life
or property?

e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of wastewater?

651
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 58
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?

Ninyo and Moore prepared a Geotechnical Evaluation on March 26, 2021, for the proposed project which is included as Appendix 5.

DISCUSSION
a) i) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. According to the Geotechnical Report, the site is not within a State of California Earthquake Fault Zone, formerly known as an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, and no known active faults traverse the site. However, the Geotechnical Report shows that the project site, as with the majority of southern California, is located within a seismically active region (Ninyo and Moore 2021). The project site does not fall within a mapped Fault Zone (RCIT 2023; Ninyo and Moore 2021). Compliance with seismic design criteria contained in the California Building Code (CBC) would minimize impacts to the extent feasible. Additionally, compliance with Mitigation Measure GEO-1, which states that the City’s Public Works Department will incorporate all recommendations made in a final geotechnical report as approved by the City related to temporary excavations, fill material, grading, utility trench backfill, foundation and concrete slab-on-grade, concrete flatwork, conventional retaining walls, lateral loading, and preliminary pavement. Compliance will be confirmed by the City as part of the building permit and inspection requirements. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
ii) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is in a seismically active region. Strong ground shaking due to moderate to severe earthquakes can be expected at the site within the lifetime of the project. Structures must also be designed and constructed to resist the effects of seismic ground motions as outlined in the most recent version of the California Building Code (CBC) Section 1613. After implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1, which states that the City’s Public Works Department will incorporate all recommendations made in a final geotechnical report, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. iii) Less Than Significant Impact. The State of California Seismic Hazard Zones Map indicates the project area is not located within an area mapped as subject to seismically induced liquefaction hazards (Ninyo and Moore 2021). However, the Riverside County GIS mapping system for liquefaction identifies the southwestern portion of the site as having a moderate potential for liquefaction (Ninyo and Moore 2021). Due to the shallow depth to bedrock encountered during 652
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 59
drilling in the vicinity of proposed buildings onsite, the liquefaction potential is not a design consideration for the proposed buildings. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. iv) No Impact. The Geotechnical Report indicated that the project site is not mapped in an area considered susceptible to seismically induced landslides. Landslides or other signs of significant slope instability were not observed during the geologic mapping with the exception of relatively shallow erosion scours along the drainage swales (Ninyo and Moore 2021). However, the risk of seismic-induced landslides at the site is considered low. Therefore, no impact would occur.
b) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project would include ground-disturbing activities that could subject surface soils to erosion. The City requires the submittal of detailed erosion control plans with any grading plans to comply with the state water quality regulations.

Since this project involves clearing, grading, or excavation that causes soil disturbance of one or more acres, it is subject to the provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) State General Permit (Order No. R9-2013-0001, as amended). Furthermore, under the State Water Board’s Construction General Permit, the proposed project is required to prepare and comply with an approved Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that provides a schedule for the implementation and maintenance of erosion control measures and a description of the erosion control practices, including appropriate design details and a time schedule.

Construction activities related to the proposed project would be subject to compliance with the CBC and would include best management practices (BMPs). Additionally, the SWPPP would consider the full range of erosion control BMPs, including any additional site-specific and seasonal conditions. BMPs may include but are not limited to covering of the disturbed or stockpiled soil, use of a dust-inhibiting material, landscaping, use of straw and jute to slow and channelize stormwater runoff, hydroseeding, and grading in a pattern than slows stormwater flow and reduces the potential for erosion. Compliance with BMPs is required by the federal and state Clean Water Acts.

The State Construction General Permit also requires that those implementing SWPPPs meet prerequisite qualifications that would demonstrate the skills, knowledge, and experience necessary to implement such plans. NPDES requirements would significantly reduce the potential for substantial erosion or topsoil loss to occur in association with new development. Additionally, as part of the approval process, prior to grading plan approval, the City’s Public Works Department would be required to comply with Wildomar Municipal Code Chapter 13.12, Stormwater Drainage System Protection, which establishes requirements for stormwater and non-stormwater quality discharge and control that require new development or redevelopment projects to control stormwater runoff by implementing appropriate BMPs to prevent the deterioration of water quality. Water quality features intended to reduce construction-related erosion impacts are required to be clearly denoted on the grading plans for implementation by the construction contractor. For a discussion of erosion and runoff impact post-construction, see Section V.10, Hydrology and Water Quality.
653
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 60
As indicated by the Geotechnical Report, any undocumented fill and stockpiled fill within the project site should be removed and replaced with properly compacted fill. Compliance with the recommendations of a final geotechnical report (see Mitigation Measure GEO-1) would reduce impacts to less than significant.

Therefore, project impacts to erosion and topsoil would be mitigated to less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
c) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. See discussion above in a.iii) and a.iv).

The project site is not at risk for landslide, collapse, liquefaction, or lateral spreading. According to Figure S-7 in the City of Wildomar General Plan, the site is located within an area that is susceptible to subsidence. As groundwater was not encountered during exploratory excavations of approximately 16 feet below the ground surface, the potential for subsidence is low. The CBC includes common engineering practices requiring special design and construction methods that reduce or eliminate potential impacts related to unstable soils. Compliance with CBC regulations and implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1 would ensure adequate design and construction of building foundations to resist soil movement.

Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. d) Less Than Significant Impact. The soils found onsite are considered to possess a very low expansion potential. The Geotechnical Report recommends that expansive clayey soils, if encountered during grading, should not be placed within the upper 12 inches of the subgrade to reduce the potential for pavement damage. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. e) No Impact. The proposed project would connect to the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) sewer collection system that runs along La Estrella Street. Therefore, the use of septic tanks or an alternative wastewater disposal system is not proposed. Therefore, no impact would occur. f) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Paleontological resources are fossilized remains of past life on earth such as bones, shells, leaves, tracks, burrows, and impressions. As shown in Figure OS-8 of the General Plan, the project site is within an area with high paleontological sensitivity.

According to the Geotechnical Report, the subsurface exploration of the site include fill, alluvium, sandstone of the Pauba Formation (which is considered to have a high sensitivity), and granodiorite of the Paloma Valley Ring Complex (Ninyo and Moore 2021). Given that the proposed project would require ground-disturbing activities, there is a potential to uncover paleontological resources. As such, implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-2, which requires paleontological monitoring, would reduce impacts to less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

1. The project shall comply with the California Building Code and Wildomar Municipal Code Chapter

13.12, Stormwater Drainage System Protection.

MITIGATION MEASURES
GEO-1 The City’s Public Works Department shall incorporate the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report prepared by Ninyo and Moore (Appendix 5) into project plans related to the proposed project. The project’s building plans shall demonstrate that they incorporate all applicable 654
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 61
recommendations of the Geotechnical Report and comply with all applicable requirements of the latest adopted version of the California Building Code.

Timing/Implementation: During building plan check, prior to any ground-disturbing construction activities
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Community Development Department and Public Works and Engineering Department
GEO-2 A paleontological grading observation schedule by a Certified Paleontologist shall be maintained when grading in bedrock units to further evaluate the fossil resources of the site. Paleontological monitoring may be reduced upon observations and recommendations of the professional-level project paleontologist. Salvage operations shall be initiated by the Certified Paleontologist and coordinated with the City’s Public Works Department if other significant concentrations of fossils, as determined by the Certified Paleontologist, are encountered. Any paleontological resources shall be provided for curation at a local curation facility, or any other local museum or repository willing and able to accept and house the resource to preserve for future scientific study.

Timing/Implementation: During ground-disturbing construction activities Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Community Development Department and Public Works and Engineering Department
655
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 62

8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?

b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?

An Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment was prepared by PlaceWorks (PlaceWorks 2023), on June 29, 2023 (see Appendix 2).

DISCUSSION
a) Less Than Significant Impact. As identified in Section V.17, Transportation, the proposed project would generate a net increase of 118 weekday vehicle trips and an increase of 234 daily trips on the weekend. In addition to an increase in vehicle emissions, operation of the proposed project would result in an increase in water demand, wastewater and solid waste generation, area sources (e.g., consumer cleaning products), and energy usage (i.e., electricity, natural gas). Annual average construction emissions from construction activities were amortized over 30 years and included in the emissions inventory to account for one-time GHG emissions from the construction phase of the project. The proposed project’s GHG emissions were quantified using CalEEMod Version 2022.1 and are shown in Table 8-1, Proposed Project GHG Emissions. The proposed project would result in a net total of approximately 375 metric tons of CO2e per year, which would not exceed the South Coast AQMD screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year.

Table 8-1 Proposed Project GHG Emissions
Category Emissions (MTCO2e /yr)
Area Sources1 <1
Energy Usage2 131
Mobile Sources3 200
Waste4 3
Water5 25
Amortized Construction6 16
Total Emissions7 375
South Coast AQMD Draft Screening Threshold 3,000
656
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 63
Threshold Exceeded? NO
Source: PlaceWorks 2023 (Appendix 2)
1 Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscape equipment. 2 Energy usage consist of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. 3 Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. 4 Solid waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. 5 Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. 6 Construction GHG emissions CO2e based on a 30-year amortization rate. 7 Total may not add up due to rounding.

Therefore, as shown in Table 8-1, the proposed project’s GHG emissions would not exceed the South Coast AQMD threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year, and this impact would be less than significant. b) Less Than Significant Impact. Applicable plans adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions include CARB’s Scoping Plan, the SCAG RTP/SCS, and Western Riverside County of Governments (WRCOG) Subregional Climate Action Plan (CAP). A consistency analysis with these plans is presented below. 2022 CARB Scoping Plan Consistency
CARB’s latest Climate Change Scoping Plan (2022) outlines the State’s strategies to reduce GHG emissions in accordance with the targets established under Assembly Bill (AB) 32, Senate Bill (SB) 32, and AB 1279.

The Scoping Plan is applicable to State agencies and is not directly applicable to cities/counties and individual projects. Nonetheless, the Scoping Plan has been the primary tool that is used to develop performance-based and efficiency-based CEQA criteria and GHG reduction targets for climate action planning efforts.

Statewide strategies to reduce GHG emissions in the 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan include:
implementing SB 100, which expands the RPS to 60 percent by 2030; expanding the Low Carbon Fuel Standards (LCFS) to 18 percent by 2030; implementing the Mobile Source Strategy to deploy zeroemission buses and trucks; implementing the Sustainable Freight Action Plan; implementing the ShortLived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy, which reduces methane and hydrofluorocarbons to 40 percent below 2013 levels by 2030 and black carbon emissions to 50 percent below 2013 levels by 2030; continuing to implement SB 375; creating a post-2020 Cap-and-Trade Program; and developing an Integrated Natural and Working Lands Action Plan to secure California’s land base as a net carbon sink.

Statewide strategies to reduce GHG emissions include the low carbon fuel standards, California Appliance Energy Efficiency regulations, California Renewable Energy Portfolio standard, changes in the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)standards, and other early action measures as necessary to ensure the State is on target to achieve the GHG emissions reduction goals of AB 32, SB 32, and AB 1279. Vehicles driving to and from the project site would utilize fuel which meets the LCFS requirements, and new vehicles purchased over the life of the project that are used in association with the proposed project would be compliant with the appliable CAFE standards and benefit from reduced fuel consumption, resulting in subsequent GHG emissions reductions. In addition, new developments are required to comply with the current Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CALGreen mandatory measures. The proposed project would experience incremental energy-source GHG emissions reductions through compliance with these building standards since they are often considered the nation’s most stringent energy efficiency 657
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 64
standards. The proposed project’s GHG emissions would be reduced from compliance with statewide measures that have been adopted since AB 32, SB 32, and AB 1279 were adopted. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

SCAG’s Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy SCAG adopted the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS (Connect SoCal) in September 2020. Connect SoCal finds that land use strategies that focus on new housing and job growth in areas rich with destinations and mobility options would be consistent with a land use development pattern that supports and complements the proposed transportation network. The overarching strategy in Connect SoCal is to plan for the southern California region to grow in more compact communities in transit priority areas and priority growth areas; provide neighborhoods with efficient and plentiful public transit; establish abundant and safe opportunities to walk, bike, and pursue other forms of active transportation; and preserve more of the region’s remaining natural lands and farmlands (SCAG 2020). Connect SoCal’s transportation projects help more efficiently distribute population, housing, and employment growth, and forecast development is generally consistent with regional-level general plan data to promote active transportation and reduce GHG emissions. The projected regional development, when integrated with the proposed regional transportation network in Connect SoCal, would reduce per-capita GHG emissions related to vehicular travel and achieve the GHG reduction per capita targets for the SCAG region.

The Connect SoCal Plan does not require that local general plans, specific plans, or zoning be consistent with the SCS, but provides incentives for consistency to governments and developers. Project implementation would result in an increase of vehicle trips to the project site. However, the proposed project is a community park which is a local-serving land use that would provide new circulation improvements for pedestrians and vehicles. Furthermore, the proposed park would provide recreational opportunities for the surrounding area and includes sustainable design strategies. Therefore, the proposed project would not interfere with SCAG’s ability to implement the regional strategies in Connect SoCal, and impacts would be less than significant.

Western Riverside County of Governments (WRCOG) Subregional Climate Action Plan (CAP) The City of Wildomar has not adopted the WRCOG Subregional Climate Action Plan (CAP) but uses the provisions of the CAP to evaluate development projects. Projects that demonstrate consistency with the strategies, actions, and emission reduction targets contained in the CAP would have a less than significant impact on climate change. Table 8-2, WRCOG Subregional CAP Reduction Measure Project Consistency, shows the proposed project’s compliance with the local reduction measures of the WRCOG Subregional CAP. As summarized in Table 8-2, the proposed project would not conflict with any of the provisions of the CAP. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Table 8-2 WRCOG CAP Local Reduction Measure Project Consistency WRCOG Local Reduction Measure Project Compliance with Measure E-1: Energy Action Plan. Improve municipal and
community wide energy efficiency and reduce
Not Applicable. This measure is not directly
applicable to the project; however, the project
658
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 65
Table 8-2 WRCOG CAP Local Reduction Measure Project Consistency WRCOG Local Reduction Measure Project Compliance with Measure energy consumption through the adoption of
local Energy Action Plans (EAP).
would be compliant with the current Title 24
standards.

E-3: Shade Trees. Strategically plant trees to
reduce the urban heat island effect.

No Conflict. The proposed project is a park and
would include the planting of trees.

T-2: Bicycle Parking. Provide additional options
of bicycle parking.

No Conflict. As shown on the site plan, the project
would include bicycle racks as per the City’s
standards.

T-8: Density. Improve jobs-housing balance and
reduce vehicle miles traveled by increasing
household and employment densities.

Not Conflict. The project is located near an existing
school and single-family neighborhoods and would
provide local and regional recreational
opportunities. Due its uses, trips to the site would
be less than development of the site under its
General Plan designation land use of Medium
Density Residential.

T-10: Design/Site Planning. Design
neighborhoods and sites to reduce VMT.

No Conflict. The proposed project includes the
development of the site with a park which includes
opportunities for active recreation. The site is
proximate to single-family homes and an
elementary school.

T-11: Pedestrian Only Access. Encourage
walking by providing only community areas.

No Conflict. The proposed project is park with
multiple opportunities for pedestrian access both
within the site and connecting off-site.

T-14: Voluntary Transportation Demand
Management. Reduce demand for roadway
travel through incentives for alternative modes
of transportation and disincentives for driving.

No Conflict. The proposed project would include
bicycle racks per the City’s standards.

T-15: Accelerated Bike Plan Implementation.

Accelerate the implementation of all or specific
components of a jurisdiction’s adopted bike
plan.

Not Applicable. This measure is not directly
applicable to the project; however, as shown on the
site plan, the project would include bicycle racks per
the City’s standards.

T-16: Fixed Guideway Transit. Introduce a fixedroute transit service in the jurisdiction.Not Applicable. This measure is not directly applicable to the project; however, the project is
located approximately 0.5-mile from existing transit
stops.

T-17: Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Programs.

Implement development requirements to
accommodate Neighborhood Electric Vehicles
Not Applicable. This measure is not directly
applicable to the project; however, the proposed
project would include electric vehicle parking spaces
659
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 66
Table 8-2 WRCOG CAP Local Reduction Measure Project Consistency WRCOG Local Reduction Measure Project Compliance with Measure and supporting infrastructure. as per the City’s standards.

T-18: Subsidized Transit. Increase access to
transit by providing free or reduced passes.

Not Applicable. This measure is not directly
applicable to the project; however, the project is
located approximately 0.5-mile from existing transit
stops.

SW-1: Yard Waste Collection. Provide green
waste collection bins community-wide.

No Conflict. The project would be required to
comply with City programs, such as City’s recycling
and waste reduction program, which comply, with
the 75 percent reduction required by 2020 per AB
341.

SW-2: Food Scrap and Paper Division. Divert
food and paper waste from landfills by
implementing collection system.

Summary
The proposed project would be consistent with the reduction goals of the WRCOG Subregional Climate Action Plan, the CARB Scoping Plan, AB 32, and SB 32. Furthermore, the proposed project would comply with applicable Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CALGreen mandatory measures, as the City has adopted the California Energy Code (Chapter 15.22, Energy Code of the Wildomar Municipal Code).

Therefore, this impact would be less than significant.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
None required.

MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.

660
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 67

9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use,
or disposal of hazardous materials?

b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?

c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?

d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code § 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment?

e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard or excessive noise for people residing or
working in the project area?

f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?

g) Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires?

661
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 68

DISCUSSION
a) Less Than Significant Impact. Construction activities at the project site would involve the use of hazardous materials such as fuel, asphalt, lubricants, toxic solvents, pesticides, and herbicides which would be transported to and from the site and be present temporarily during construction. These potentially hazardous materials would not be used in large enough quantities to pose a significant hazard to public health and safety or the environment. Following construction there would be no hazardous materials on the site.

Operation of the proposed project would involve the use of hazardous materials such as cleaners, solvents, paints, degreasers, pesticides, fertilizers, and other custodial products. The materials used and stored onsite would be clearly labeled and safely stored in compliance with state and federal requirements.

The transport, use, storage, and disposal of these materials would comply with existing regulations established by several agencies, including the Department of Toxic Substances Control, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the US Department of Transportation, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Compliance with federal, state, and local laws and regulations would reduce impacts to less than significant.
b) Less Than Significant Impact. As described in the response to 9. a), above, construction and operation of the proposed project would involve the transport, storage, and use of hazardous materials on the site including common cleaning substances, building maintenance products, lubricants, paints, solvents, herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers.

An impact could occur if construction and operation of the proposed project create conditions where hazardous materials could easily contaminate surrounding soil, water, or air. The most likely scenarios would be from rainwater runoff spreading contaminated waste. However, construction projects typically maintain supplies onsite for containing and cleaning small spills of hazardous materials. Construction activities would not involve a significant amount of hazardous materials, and their use would be temporary. Furthermore, project construction workers would be trained on the proper use, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. Also, construction activities would be conducted in accordance with the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as part of the NPDES permit, as detailed in Section V.10, Hydrology and Water Quality. The primary objective of the SWPPP is to identify, construct, implement, and maintain best management practices (BMPs) to reduce or eliminate pollutants in stormwater discharges and authorized non-stormwater discharges from the construction site. BMPs for hazardous materials include, but are not limited to, off-site refueling, placement of generators on impervious surfaces, establishing clean out areas for cement, etc. While the risk of exposure to hazardous materials cannot be eliminated, adherence to existing regulations would ensure compliance with safety standards related to the use and storage of hazardous materials and with the safety procedures mandated by applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Therefore, transport, use, and/or disposal of hazardous materials during construction and operation of the proposed project would be properly managed, and impacts would be less than significant.
662
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 69
c) Less Than Significant Impact. Ronald Reagan Elementary, directly southeast of the project site and Kiddie Kreek Preschool, are within a quarter mile of the project site. However, given the nature of the proposed project (park facility), the type of hazardous materials that would be used during construction and operation would be limited, and the handling and disposal of all materials would be subject to applicable state and federal regulations, ordinances, and regulations. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
d) No Impact. The project site is not included on a list of hazardous materials databases compiled by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) or the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) (DTSC 2023; SWRCB 2023). The project site is not listed on environmental databases for hazardous sites, and there are no Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST)/Spill sites on site (EPA 2023).

Therefore, no impact would occur.
e) No Impact. The project site is not located within any airport land use plan. The closest public airport is French Valley Airport, which is located approximately 6.7 miles southeast of the project site. Given the distance and because the project is not in the airport land use plan area for French Valley Airport, there is no impact.
f) Less Than Significant Impact. Access to the project site would be provided via six entrances/exits: two along Wildomar Trail, one along La Estrella Street, and three along Susan Drive. Construction would take place within the project site; no roadway closures are anticipated. If roadway closure(s) or reduction in access/capacity is necessary during construction (i.e., to connect to water, sewer, or utilities), the City would prepare detour plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. Adherence to these requirements would ensure that the project would not have a significant impact on emergency response and evacuation plans. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. g) Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. California Government Code Chapter 6.8 directs the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to identify areas of very high fire hazard severity within Local Responsibility Areas (LRA). Mapping of the areas, referred to as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ), is based on data and models of potential fuels over a 30- to 50-year time horizon and their associated expected fire behavior and expected burn probabilities, which quantifies the likelihood and nature of vegetation fire exposure to buildings. LRA VHFHSZ maps were initially developed in the mid1990s and are now being updated based on improved science, mapping techniques, and data. In 2008, the California Building Standards Commission adopted California Building Code Chapter 7A requiring new buildings in Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones to use ignition-resistant construction methods and materials.

The eastern and western portions of the City of Wildomar have been designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. The project site is within a VHFHSZ within the LRA (CAL FIRE 2023). Development on the project site would be subject to compliance with the 2022 California Building Code (or the most current version) and the 2022 edition of the California Fire Code (or the most current version). The 2022 California Fire Code (Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations) includes Section 4905.2, Construction Methods and Requirements within Established Limits. Fire Code Chapter 49 cites specific requirements 663
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 70
for wildland-urban interface areas that include, but are not limited to, providing defensible space and hazardous vegetation and fuel management. Wildomar is covered under the County of Riverside Emergency Operations Plan and the Riverside County Operation Area Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (Riverside County 2019; Riverside County 2023). These plans provide guidance to effectively respond to any emergency, including wildfires. In addition, all proposed construction is required to meet minimum standards for fire safety, and Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2, which require conformance with the California Building Code and Fire Code, would be implemented. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

1. City of Wildomar Municipal Code Chapter 8.28, Fire Code, requires compliance with the 2022 California Building Code (or most current version) and the 2022 edition of the California Fire Code (Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations).

2. City of Wildomar Municipal Code Chapter 8.28, Fire Code, requires adherence to California Fire Code Chapter 49, which cites specific requirements for wildland-urban interface areas.

MITIGATION MEASURES
HAZ-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the City’s Public Works Department shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Building Official and the Riverside County Fire Chief, compliance with the 2022 California Building Code (or the most recent edition) (Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations) and the 2022 California Fire Code (or the most recent edition) (Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including those regulations pertaining to materials and construction methods intended to mitigate wildfire exposure as described in the 2022 California Building Code and California Residential Code (or most recent edition); specifically California Building Code Chapter 7A; California Residential Code Section R327; California Residential Code Section R337; California Referenced Standards Code Chapter 12-7A; and California Fire Code Chapter 49.

Timing/Implementation: Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Building Department and Riverside County Fire Department
664
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 71

10. Hydrology and Water Quality
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Impact
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or ground water
quality?

b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?

c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern
of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river or
through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a
manner which would:
i) result in a substantial erosion or siltation
on- or off-site;

ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or offsite;

iii) create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or

iv) impede or redirect flood flows? 
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project inundation?

e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?

665
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 72

DISCUSSION
a) Less Than Significant Impact.

Construction
As part of Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, the US Environmental Protection Agency has established regulations under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program to control direct stormwater discharges. The NPDES program regulates industrial pollutant discharges, which include construction activities. In California, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) administers the NPDES permitting program and is responsible for developing NPDES permitting requirements.

Wildomar Municipal Code Section 13.12.050 requires development to comply with a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. Section F.1 of the MS4 permit specifies requirements for new developments, and Section F.1.D details the requirements for standard stormwater mitigation plans (also known as water quality management plans).

The MS4 permit imposes pollution prevention requirements on planned developments, construction sites, commercial and industrial businesses, municipal facilities and activities, and residential activities.

Even though Wildomar is split by two watersheds (Santa Ana and Santa Margarita) that affect some of the properties in the City, the entire City is governed by the MS4 permit for the Santa Margarita region.

Requirements for waste discharges potentially affecting stormwater from construction sites of one acre or more are set forth in the SWRCB’s Construction General Permit Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-0006-DWQ (a new order becomes effective September 1, 2023, Order No. 2022-0057-DWQ). The project’s disturbed area is larger than one acre and would be subject to requirements of the Construction General Permit. Projects obtain coverage under the Construction General Permit by filing a Notice of Intent with the SWRCB prior to grading activities and preparing and implementing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction. The primary objective of the SWPPP is to identify, construct, implement, and maintain BMPs to reduce or eliminate pollutants in stormwater discharges and authorize non-stormwater discharges from the project site, and to contain hazardous materials. BMPs categories include, but are not limited to, erosion control and wind erosion control, sediment control, tracking control, non-storm water management controls, and waste management controls. Implementation of BMPs and monitoring required under the SWPPP would reduce, minimize, eliminate and/or treat pollutants and prevent short-term intermittent impacts to water quality from construction activities to less than significant levels.

Operation
The primary constituents of concern during the project operational phase would be solids, oils, and grease from parking area and driveways that could be carried offsite, pesticides, trash and debris, bacterial indicators, nutrients, and toxic organic compouunds. Structural BMPs may include, but are not limited to, drainage stenciling and signage, avoiding the use of unprotected metals for roofing/gutters/trim, and designing landscape to minimize irritation and runoff. Operational source control BMPs may include maintaining inlet markings, maintaining drains to prevent blockages, maintaining landscaping using 666
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 73
minimal or no pesticides, and inspecting and cleaning receptacles. The BMPs would properly manage flow and prevent stormwater pollution by reducing the potential for contamination at the source. The BMPs specific to the proposed project would be approved by the City.

Additionally, onsite landscaping would assist with minimizing the amount of runoff from the site by providing permeable areas for water infiltration and decreasing runoff volume.

Runoff from the proposed project would be collected in 12 drainage management areas, some of which would include biofiltration and/or bioretention basins, storm drains, as shown in Figure 5, Drainage Map.

The drainage management areas, which would be a total of approximately 27.39 acres, would accommodate water flows of 52.6 cubic feet per second (cfs).

In general, projects must control pollutants, pollutant loads, and runoff volume from the project site by controlling runoff through infiltration or bioretention. Projects must incorporate BMPs in accordance with the requirements of the municipal NPDES permit. The project would comply with water quality standards, and impacts are less than significant.
b) Less Than Significant Impact.

According to the Geotechnical Report, no groundwater or evidence of previous groundwater was encountered during any of the exploratory borings or trenches at a maximum depth of 16.5 feet (Ninyo and Moore 2021). The projectsite lies within the Santa Margarita River Watershed. The project site would be subject to the Elsinore Basin Groundwater Management Plan as the site would be served by the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District.

Groundwater recharge occurs when water seeps through soil to replenish underground aquifers.

Groundwater recharge is a major practice in Southern California. The primary sources of groundwater recharge in basins are:
• Recharge from precipitation – Rainfall directly to the basin. • Surface water infiltration – Recharge from infiltration of surface waters such as streams. • Infiltration from land use – Direct surface recharge from application of water for irrigation. • Infiltration from septic tanks – Infiltration in areas serviced by septic systems in the basin.

The Elsinore Basin, which is a major source of potable groundwater supply for Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD), has not been identified to be in a state of overdraft (DWR 2023). Furthermore, active groundwater management and conjunctive use programs have been implemented by EVMWD to ensure the balance of inflows and outflows of the Elsinore Basin (EVMWD 2021). Therefore, the proposed project would not impede sustainable groundwater management of the Basin, and impacts would be less than significant.
c)
i, ii) Less Than Significant Impact.
667
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 74
Please refer to issue b) in Section V.7, Geology and Soils, for further discussion of erosion. Surface water drainage would be controlled by building regulations, with the water directed toward existing streets, flood control channels, storm drains, and biofiltration and bioretention basins.

The proposed drainage for the site would channel runoff into the proposed biofiltration and bioretention basins within the drainage management areas, and would not otherwise increase the erosion or siltation potential of the site or any downstream areas. As discussed above, the proposed project is subject to NPDES requirements and the Regional MS4 permit. Additionally, the City’s Public Works Department is required to submit a SWPPP to reduce erosion and sedimentation of downstream watercourses during project construction. Furthermore, a detailed erosion control plan would need to be submitted to the City Public Works and Engineering Department for approval prior to obtaining a grading permit. Implementation of an erosion control plan would address any erosion issues associated with proposed grading and site preparation. Although future development would result in approximately 434,000 square feet of new impervious surfaces on the site (approximately 37 percent of the project site), the proposed project would develop drainage management areas with storm drains, bioretention basins, and infiltration basins to capture runoff.

The site is undeveloped with exposed soils and shrubs that generally drains from northeast to southwest. According to Figure 5, the proposed project would include 12 drainage management areas which would be able to accommodate approximately 52.6 cfs of water. Routing of surface flows into the storm drains, and biofiltration and bioretention basins would ensure water flows are captured.

Additionally, operational BMPs would minimize erosion, siltation, and flooding on- or off-site.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
iii) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would include bioretention and biofiltration basins and storm drains to capture runoff. The proposed project would be designed to preserve the natural topography to the extent possible, including the preservation of natural drainage courses throughout the project site. Pedestrian bridges would be constructed over some of the drainage courses instead of grading those areas and placing culverts. Additionally, the proposed project is required to comply with Wildomar Municipal Code Section 13.12.050, which requires development to comply with a MS4 Permit from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. Therefore, the proposed project would not exceed the capacity of the existing stormwater system. Impacts would be less than significant.
668
1420 1420
1425
1425
1430
1430
1435
1440
1445
1450
1455
1460
1465
1470
1475
1480
1435
1440
1445
1450
1455
1460
1465
1470
1475
1480
1485
1490
1495
1500
1505
1510
1515
1515
74'
37'
22' 15'
22' 15'
74'
37'
100'
50'
18' 32'
1400
1405
1410
1415
1401
1402
1403
1404
1406
1407
1408
1409
1411
1412
1413
1414
1416
1417
1415
1420
1425
1414
1416
14171418
1419
1421
14221423
1424
1410
1410
1415
1420
1420
1425
1430
1409
1411
1412
1413
1414
1416
1417 1418 1419
1421
1422
1423
1424
1426
1427 1428
1429
1420
1425
1418
1419
1421
1421
1421
1422
1423
1424
1426
1427
SS

SS W W W W SS
W W

W W W W

W W W W W W W W

W W W SS W W SS W SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

W W W W

W W W W W W W W

W W W SS W W SS W SS
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD

LA ESTRELLA STREET

WILDOMAR TRAIL
DMA 2 PROPOSED

BIOFILTRATION
AREAREQ=5,500 FT2
EXISTING 48" SD INLET

EXISTING HEADWALL
AND 18" SD OUTLET

EXISTING UPESTREAM
HEADWALL AND 18"

SD OUTLET

PROPOSED

BIORETENTION BASIN PROPOSED SD

PROPOSED SD

PROPOSED BRIDGE

CROSSING

PROPOSED BRIDGE

CROSSING

PROPOSED SD

EXISTING CONCRETE SWALE AND
HEADWALL WITH 12" SD OUTLET

FROM SCHOOL
SD

PROPOSED SD

SD SD SD

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CONVEYING

EXISTING SCHOOL FLOWS FROM

EXISTING SWALE AND PIPE

EXISTING STORM DRAIN FROM

SCHOOL BIORETENTION BASIN,
ASSUME OUTLET TO EXISTING GRADE.

EXTEND PIPE TO CREEK OR EXISTING

STORM DRAIN SYSTEM

STORM DRAIN PER MASTER

DRAINAGE PLAN (NOT

FOUND) - VERIFY WITH CITY

STORM DRAIN PER MASTER

DRAINAGE PLAN, NOT
FOUND IN FIELD. CITY TO
VERIFY INTENT/USE.

PROPOSED HEAD WALL AND

STORM DRAIN INLET

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CONVEYING
EXISTING FLOWS FROM DMA 5 AND
OVERFLOW FROM DMA 6

SEWER FORCE MAIN TO CONNECT
TO LA ESTRELLA SEWER MAIN.

CONNECT TO

EXISTING WATER MAIN

PROPOSED WATER

LATERAL

PROPOSED SEWER

LATERAL

PROPOSED

IRRIGATION LATERAL

POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL

SELF TREATING DMA AREA
DMA 11

1.01 ACRES

1.94 CFS
DMA 9

1.81 ACRES

3.47 CFS
DMA 5

3.13 ACRES

6.02 CFS
DMA 7

0.43 ACRES

0.82 CFS
DMA 8

0.06 ACRES

0.12 CFS
DMA 12

1.20 ACRES

2.31 CFS
DMA 10

0.47 ACRES

0.90 CFS
DMA 6

5.62 ACRES

10.79 CFS
DMA 1

0.05 ACRES

0.09 CFS
DMA 2

8.23 ACRES

15.81 CFS
DMA 13

0.27 ACRES

0.52 CFS
DMA 14

5.11 ACRES

9.81 CFS
DMA 7 PROPOSED

BIORETENTION BASIN B
AREAREQ=~550 ft2
(DMA 13) PROPOSED

BIORETENTION BASIN C
AREAREQ=250 FT2
(DMA 12) PROPOSED

BIORETENTION BASIN D
AREAREQ=~1260 FT2
(DMA 10-11) PROPOSED

BIORETENTION BASIN E
AREAREQ=~1,750 FT2

TOPO LIMITS

PROPERTY
LINE

ROW ROW
44' 44'
44' CL TO ROW PER

PORRAS ROAD

IMPROVEMENT PLANS
50' 50'
50' CL TO ROW PER

STANDARD

HIGHWAY PLANS

PROPOSED BRIDGE

CROSSING

OPTIONAL SEWER MAIN

EXTENSION FOR FUTURE USE

END OF EXISTING SEWER MAIN
(NOT IN USE) SCHOOL'S SEWER

FORCE MAIN LA ESTRELLA EXISING

SEWER MANHOLE
APRIL 2021
27 ACRE PARK

WQMP DRAINAGE MAP EXHIBIT
0 160 feet
1"=80'
80 240

DRAINAGE AREA
LEGEND

PROPERTY LINE

ROAD CENTERLINE
Source: RRM Design Group 2021.

PlaceWorks
0 Scale (Feet)
240
Figure 5 - Drainage Map
IV. Environmental Checklist Form
Drainage Area Property Line Road Centerline
27-ACRE PARK INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

CITY OF WILDOMAR
669
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 76
iv). Less Than Significant Impact. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the project site is not within any flood risk zone, nor is it within a 100- or 500-year flood zone (FEMA 2008). Although the proposed project would increase impervious surfaces onsite, the project site is not located within an area of flood risk, and the proposed drainage management areas would reduce impacts from on- or off-site flooding. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur.
d) No Impact. As provided in Section V.10.c.iv, the project site is not within a flood hazard zone. The project site is not in an area that is subject to seiches, mudflows, or tsunamis due to the absence of any nearby bodies of water and mud/debris channels (Ninyo and Moore 2021). Additionally, Riverside County identifies dam inundation hazard areas throughout the County. A review of records maintained at the California Office of Emergency Services provided potential failure inundation maps for 23 dams affecting Riverside County; these maps were compiled into geographic information system (GIS) digital coverage of potential dam inundation zones. The County’s dam inundation zones are identified in Figure S-10 of the Wildomar General Plan. As shown in Figure S-10, the project site is not in any dam inundation hazard zones (Wildomar 2003). In addition, the project is not in the vicinity of any levees(USACE 2023). Therefore, the project would not be exposed to seiches, mudflows, or tsunami hazards, and no impact would occur. e) Less Than Significant Impact. The project site would be subject to the Elsinore Basin Groundwater Management Plan as the site would be served by the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) which gets its water from the Elsinore Basin. As provided in section VI.10.b, above, the proposed project would not conflict or obstruct implementation of Elsinore Groundwater Basin Management Plan.

Additionally, active groundwater management and conjunctive use programs have been implemented by EVMWD to ensure the balance of inflows and outflows of the Elsinore Basin (EVMWD 2021).

The project site is in the Water Quality Improvement Plan for the Santa Margarita River Watershed Management Area. The proposed project would comply with water quality requirements set forth in the Statewide General Construction Permit, the Regional MS4/NPDES Permit, and the City of Wildomar Municipal Code Section 13.12 (Stormwater Discharge System Protection). Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan, and impacts would be less than significant.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

1. Wildomar Municipal Code Section 13.12.060 requires that new construction and renovation control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. The City shall identify the BMPs that may be implemented to prevent such deterioration, as part of the building plan check review process prior to construction.

MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
670
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 77

11. Land Use and Planning
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than Significant
Impact with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Physically divide an established
community?

b) Cause a significant environmental
impact due to a conflict with any land
use plan, policy, or regulation adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating
an environmental effect?


DISCUSSION
a) No Impact. The project site is in an urbanized area characterized primarily by residential land uses.

The surrounding area includes residential, educational, and undeveloped uses. The site is vacant and zoned Rural Residential (R-R) and has a land use designation of Medium Density Residential (MDR).

Implementation of the proposed project would be consistent with the existing uses in the surrounding area and would conform to the City’s vision for development in this area. The proposed project would not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community; therefore, no impact would occur.
b) Less Than Significant Impact. The project site has a land use designation of Medium Density Residential (MDR) and is zoned Rural Residential (R-R). The proposed project is consistent with the policies and development standards established under these designations and ordinances. As described in Section

17.16, R-R Rural Residential Zone, of the Wildomar Municipal Code, a variety of uses are permitted within this zone, including public parks, upon approval of a plot plan.

The development standards listed in the Section 17.16, R-R Rural Residential Zone, of the Wildomar Municipal Code, restrict structures to a maximum height of 50 feet. The tallest structure, the fire station, of the proposed project would be up to 41 feet. The proposed project would adhere to all additional development standards listed in Section 17.16, R-R Rural Residential Zone, of the Wildomar Municipal Code, and other applicable standards of the Municipal Code.

Additionally, the City is a signatory to the MSHCP, as discussed in Section V.4.a, Biological Resources, of this Initial Study, and therefore, the proposed project is required to pay fees applicable to this type of project. Compliance with the MSHCP, applicable General Plan policies, and zoning ordinances would result in a less than significant impact.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

1. The City of Wildomar will pay fees, as applicable to this type of project, in conformance Title 3, Revenue and Finance, of the Wildomar Municipal Code. Such fees may include the Western 671
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 78
Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan fees and Stephen’s Kangaroo Rat Conservation fees.

MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
672
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 79

12. Mineral Resources
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Impact
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the state?

b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?


DISCUSSION
a) No Impact. There are no mines mapped on the project site (CDC 2016). Additionally, the project site is in an area designated as MRZ-3 by the Wildomar General Plan (Wildomar 2003). The MRZ-3 zone includes areas where the available geologic information indicates that while mineral deposits are likely to exist, the significance of the deposit is undetermined. The General Plan Open Space-Mineral Resources (OS-MIN) land use designation allows mineral extraction and processing facilities, based on the applicable Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) classification. Those land areas held in reserve for future mining activities are also designated OS-MIN. No areas within the City boundaries are designated as OS-MIN. As a result, no impacts would occur.
b) No Impact. There are no known locally important mineral resource recovery sites identified on the project site in the Wildomar General Plan or in a specific plan or other land use plan. Construction of the proposed project would not create a substantial demand of aggregate resources. As a result, no impact would occur.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
None required.

MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
673
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 80

13. Noise
Issues, would the project result in:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Impact
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?

b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?

c) For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?

A Noise Impact Assessment was prepared by ECORP Consulting, Inc. in June 2023 (ECORP 2023c) which is summarized herein and included as Appendix 6.

DISCUSSION
a) Less Than Significant Impact.

Onsite Construction Noise
Construction noise associated with the proposed project would be temporary and would vary depending on the specific nature of the activities being performed. Noise generated would primarily be associated with the operation of off-road equipment for onsite construction activities as well as construction vehicle traffic on area roadways. Construction noise typically occurs intermittently and varies depending on the nature or phase of construction (e.g., site preparation, excavation, paving).

To estimate the worst-case onsite construction noise levels that may occur at the nearest noise-sensitive receptors and to evaluate the potential health-related effects from construction noise, the construction equipment noise levels were calculated using the Federal Highway Administration’s Roadway Noise Construction Model. For the purposes of this analysis, the lowest, more conservative threshold of 85 dBA Leq is used as an acceptable threshold for construction noise at the nearby sensitive receptors. The analysis employs the FTA guidance for calculating construction noise, which recommends measuring construction noise produced by all construction equipment operating simultaneously from the center of the project site, which is approximately 362 feet from the nearest receptor, Ronald Reagan Elementary School, and 674
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 81
approximately 727 feet from the single-family residences east of the project site. The anticipated shortterm construction noise levels generated for the necessary equipment are presented in Table 13-1, Construction Average Noise Levels (dBA) at Nearest Receptors.

Table 13-1 Construction Average Noise Levels (dBA) at Nearest Receptors Construction Phase
Estimates Exterior Construction Noise
Level @ Closest Noise Sensitive Receptor
(dBA Leq)
Construction Noise Standard
(dBA Leq) Exceeds Standards?
Site Preparation 70.4 85 No
Grading 71.0 85 No
Building, Construction, Paving,
and Painting 73.3 85 No
Source: ECORP 2023c (Appendix 6)
As show in Table 13-1, construction activities would not exceed the applicable noise standards.

Additionally, the construction noise was modeled on a worst-case basis, and it is unlikely that all construction equipment would be operating at the same time. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Offsite Construction Worker Trips
Project construction would result in additional traffic on adjacent roadways over the period that construction occurs. According to CalEEMod, the maximum number of project construction trips traveling to and from the site during a single construction phase would not be expected to exceed 26 daily trips in total. The project site is mainly accessible from Wildomar Trail Road. In the area surrounding the project site, there are over 198 single-family homes that would use Wildomar Trail Road as a primary route of travel. Therefore, these 198 homes could be expected to contribute up to 1,870 daily trips on Wildomar Trail Road. Additionally, Ronald Reagan Elementary School is also accessible from Wildomar Trail Road and would contribute up to 846 daily trips. In total, it can be expected that Wildomar Trail Road can expect up to 2,716 average daily trips per day from the residential and school uses. Therefore, the 26 daily trips generated during project construction would not result in a double of traffic, and therefore, the contribution of project construction trips to the existing traffic noise would not be perceptible.

Additionally, project construction would be temporary, and these trips would cease upon completion of the proposed project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Operations
The nearest noise sensitive receptor is the Ronald Reagan Elementary School which is located directly south and east of the project site. Additionally, there are several single-family homes approximately 60 feet east of the project site. Operational noise sources associated with the proposed project include recreational and park activities, noise associated with the proposed community center/amphitheater, and noise associated with the proposed fire station.

PROJECT LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
The City’s General Plan establishes noise/land use compatibility standards within the Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure Table (Table N-1 of the General Plan). The compatibility standard for playgrounds and neighborhoods parks is 70 dBA CNEL. Noise measurements were collected 675
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 82
for the proposed project. The ambient recorded noise levels ranged from 44.5 to 65.6 dBA Leq over the course of the three short-term noise measurements taken in the project area, and the ambient noise levels recorded by the long-term measurement indicate that the project area currently experiences a noise level of 57 CNEL dBA. As these noise levels are less than the City’s 70 dBA CNEL threshold, the project site is considered an appropriate noise environment to locate the proposed project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

OPERATIONAL TRAFFIC NOISE
The calculated traffic noise levels as a result of the proposed project at sensitive land uses were compared to the City’s protective standard of 60 dBA CNEL promulgated by Policy N 1.3. Using the FHWA roadway noise prediction model, the proposed project’s traffic noise in conjunction with the estimated existing traffic noise would equate to 50.1 dBA Ldn, with a total of daytime noise of 49.8 dBA Leq, and a total nighttime noise of 41.3 dBA Leq. The proposed project operational activities are expected to occur mainly during daytime hours, with some activities extending to sunset and evening hours (e.g., events at the community center). The calculated proposed project traffic noise levels are below the noise standard established by the City for the protection of sensitive land uses surrounding the project site. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

OPERATIONAL ONSITE NOISE – EXEMPT STATIONARY NOISE
The proposed project would include park and fire station uses onsite. Section 9.48.020 of the City’s Municipal Code exempts the sound from public safety personnel in the course of executing their official duties. As such, noise from emergency vehicles is exempt from the noise standards in the City.

Nonetheless, an analysis was conducted to determine if emergency vehicles would result in a significant impact.

Federal regulation limits emergency siren noise to 123 dBA at 10 feet. Factoring an attenuation rate of approximately 6 dBA per doubling of distance from the source equates to a noise level of approximately 103.5 dBA at 100 feet. Since emergency vehicle response is by nature rapid, the duration of exposure to this peak noise level is estimated to last for a maximum of 10 to 20 seconds as emergency vehicles enter and exit the western boundary of project site, where the station would be located. Therefore, receptors would be exposed to very short-duration high noise levels for approximately 10 to 20 seconds for each emergency response event. Further, it is typical practice for emergency vehicles to use sirens to break traffic at intersections or warn drivers of the emergency vehicle approach when traffic is congested.

It is not unlikely in minor emergency scenarios that a siren is not used. Responses to nighttime emergency calls, when nuisance noise is most noticeable, routinely occur without the use of sirens when possible. It is also noted that the manner in which older homes in California were constructed generally provides a reduction of exterior-to-interior noise levels of about 20 to 25 dBA with closed windows. The exterior-tointerior reduction of newer residential units is generally 30 dBA or more.

A key focus of analysis with regard to noise is the potential for long-term exposure to higher noise levels (i.e., continuous, involuntary exposure for many hours per day over a long period of time) that may adversely affect human health. As a result of this emphasis, noise standards focus on increases in longterm exposure to ongoing average noise levels rather than infrequent short-duration peak effects. Siren noise from intermittent emergency vehicle trips sourced from the project site would not substantially 676
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 83
change the community noise level for the project area as the intermittent siren use would not constitute a significant change in the existing noise environment. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

OPERATIONAL ONSITE NOISE
On-site noise associated with the proposed project has been calculated using the SoundPLAN 3D noise Model, and modeled daytime and nighttime scenarios. The daytime modeling scenario includes all the features of the proposed project, namely the parking lots, standard day-to-day activities of the fire station, recreational play areas, volleyball courts, the community center building, and amphitheater. The nighttime modeling scenario includes only the amphitheater, the associated parking lot, and the proposed buildings on the site. For the purposes of this analysis, the City of Wildomar exterior noise standards for the nearby receptors were used to evaluate proposed project related impacts from onsite noise. Table 13-2, Calculated Operational Onsite Noise, shows the predicted proposed project noise levels at nine nearby sensitive receptors constituting of eight residences and Ronald Reagan Elementary School.

Table 13-2 Calculated Operational Onsite Noise
Location Modeled Operational Noise
(daytime/nighttime)
City Exterior Noise Standards (dBA
Leq) (daytime/nighttime) Exceeds Standards?
#1 Residence on El Diamante Drive 43.8 / 36.7 55 / 45 No #2 Residence on El Diamante Drive 43.8 / 36.7 55 / 45 No #3 Residence on El Diamante Drive 44.1 / 36.9 55 / 45 No #4 Residence on El Diamante Drive 44.0 / 36.4 55 / 45 No #5 Residence on El Diamante Drive 43.6 / 35.4 55 / 45 No #6 Residence on Susan Drive 46.6 / 37.2 55 / 45 No
#7 Residence on Susan Drive 41.3 / 29.2 55 / 45 No
#8 Residence on Steven Drive 51.0 / 27.3 55 /45 No
#9 Ronald Reagan Elementary School 48.1 / 37.9 65 / 55 No Source: ECORP 2023c (Appendix 6)
As shown in Table 13-2, project operational noise would not exceed daytime or nighttime noise standards and impacts would be less than significant.
b) Less Than Significant Impact.

Construction Vibration
Excessive groundborne vibration impacts result from continuously occurring vibration levels. Increases in groundborne vibration levels attributable to the proposed project would be primarily associated with short-term construction-related activities. Construction on the project site would have the potential to result in varying degrees of temporary groundborne vibration depending on the specific construction equipment used and the operations involved. Ground vibration generated by construction equipment spreads through the ground and diminishes in magnitude with increases in distance.

Construction-related ground vibration is normally associated with impact equipment such as pile drivers, jackhammers, and the operation of some heavy-duty construction equipment, such as dozers and trucks. 677
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 84
It is not anticipated that pile drivers or jackhammers would be necessary during construction of the proposed project. Vibration decreases rapidly with distance, and it is acknowledged that construction activities would occur throughout the project site and would not be concentrated at the point closest to sensitive receptors. Groundborne vibration levels associated with construction equipment are summarized in Table 13-3, Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment.

Table 13-3 Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment Equipment Type Peak Particle Velocity at 25 Feet (inches per second)
Large Bulldozer 0.089
Pile Drive 0.170
Loaded Trucks 0.076
Hoe Ram 0.089
Jackhammer 0.035
Small Bulldozer/Tractor 0.003
Vibratory Roller 0.210
Source: ECORP 2023c (Appendix 6)
The City of Wildomar does not promulgate a threshold for assessing groundborne vibrations. For comparison purposes, the County of Riverside standard of 0.01 inch per second RMS for assessing groundborne vibration from rail-related activities, promulgated by County General Plan Policy N 16.3, is used as a threshold. This level of ground vibration equates to the range of human perception and is unlikely to cause damage to any type of building. Consistent with FTA recommendations for calculating construction vibration, construction vibration was measured from the center of the project site. The nearest structure of concern to the construction site, with regard to groundborne vibrations, is Ronald Reagan Elementary School, approximately 362 feet from the center of the site. Table 13-4, Construction Vibration Levels at 362 Feet, shows the proposed project related vibration levels at a distance of 362 feet.

Table 13-4 Construction Vibration Levels at 362 Feet
Receiver PPV Levels (in/sec)1 Peak
Vibration
RMS
Velocity
Levels2
Threshold Exceed
Threshold?
Large
Bulldozer,
Caisson
Drilling,
Hoe Ram
Loaded
Trucks
Jackhammer Pile
Driver
Vibratory
Roller

0.0016 0.0016 0.0006 0.0031 0.0038 0.0038 0.002 0.01 No Source: ECORP 2023c (Appendix 6)
1 Distance to the nearest structure of concern is approximately 362 feet measured from the project site center. 2 Vibration levels in PPV are converted to RMS velocity using a 0.70 conversion factor identified by Caltrans. 678
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 85
As shown in Table 13-4, vibration as a result of onsite construction activities on the project site would not exceed 0.01 PPV at the nearest structure. Therefore, onsite project construction would not exceed the threshold and impacts would be less than significant.

Operational Vibration
Project operations would not include the use of any stationary equipment that would result in excessive vibration levels. The proposed project would not accommodate heavy-duty trucks or equipment.

Therefore, the proposed project would result in negligible groundborne vibration during operations, and impacts would be less than significant.
c) No Impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan. There is no public airport or public use airport located within two miles of the projectsite; however, the nearest airport is the French Valley Airport located approximately 6.7 miles southeast of the project site. The proposed project would not expose people residing or working in the area to excessive noise levels. Therefore, no impact would occur.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

1. As required by the City of Wildomar Municipal Code Sections 9.48.020 and 15.04.010, all construction and general maintenance activities shall be limited to the hours 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM from October through May (Monday–Saturday), and between 6:30 AM and 6:00 PM (Monday–Saturday) from June through September. No construction is permitted on Sundays or City-observed holidays unless approved by the City Building Official or City Engineer.

MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
679
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 86

14. Population and Housing
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Impact
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?

b) Displace substantial numbers of existing
people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?


DISCUSSION
a) Less than Significant Impact. Construction of the proposed project would require contractors and laborers. Because of the size of the proposed project, the City expects that the supply of general construction labor would be available from the local and regional labor pool. The unemployment rate for Riverside County region is 4.1 percent (BLS 2023). The proposed project would not result in a long-term increase in employment from short-term construction activities.

The proposed project is expected to create approximately 9 to 12 new jobs at the fire station and 3 new jobs at the community center. The proposed project employment generation is not expected to result in a significant relocation of employees to the region due to the size of the existing labor pool in the area.

Additionally, when compared to the Southern California Association of Government’s (SCAG) employment 2045 projection of 11,200 workers in the City, the proposed project’s contribution to overall population increases due to employment is marginal (SCAG 2020). Therefore, the proposed project would not directly nor indirectly induce substantial unplanned growth to the City’s population. b) No Impact. The project site is vacant and does not contain any housing units. Therefore, the construction of the proposed project would not displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing units, which could necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. No impact would occur.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
None required.

MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
680
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 87

15. Public Services
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Impact
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? 
b) Police protection? 
c) Schools? 
d) Parks? 
e) Other public facilities? 

DISCUSSION
a) Less Than Significant Impact. The Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD) provides fire protection and safety services to the City of Wildomar. RCFD Fire Station 75 on 38900 Clinton Keith Road in the City of Murrieta is approximately 3 miles southwest of the site and RCFD Fire Station 61 on 32637 Gruwell Street in the City of Wildomar is approximately 2 miles to the west of the site. These and several other Riverside County and Murrieta Fire Department stations in the surrounding area would be able to provide fire protection services to the project site, if needed. As noted in Section III of this IS/MND, it is uncertain as to whether the project could contain the proposed fire station. However, if the fire station can be built on the site, the development plans would be reviewed by the Riverside County Fire Department to ensure all applicable standards are met. Regardless, if the fire station cannot be built as part of the project, the proposed project is not expected to result in activities that create unusual fire protection needs, therefore any such impacts are considered less than significant.
b) Less Than Significant Impact. Police protection services are provided in Wildomar by the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department (RCSD). The nearest sheriff’s station is located at 333 Limited Street in Lake Elsinore, approximately 6.5 miles northwest of the project site. Traffic enforcement is provided in this area of Riverside County by the California Highway Patrol, with additional support from local Riverside County Sheriff’s Department personnel.

The Sheriff’s Department strives to maintain a recommended servicing of 1.2 sworn law enforcement personnel for every 1,000 residents (Wildomar 2018). The proposed project would introduce new land 681
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 88
uses to the site but as discussed in Section V.14, Population and Housing, it is not anticipated to induce substantial population growth in the area; additionally, no residential uses are proposed. The project uses would instead serve the projected growth, and therefore, would not be expected to substantially increase the demand for police protection services. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c) Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is in the Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD).

As discussed in issue a) in Section V. 14, Population and Housing, the proposed project would not induce substantial growth to the City’s population, and would not propose residential uses. Therefore, this impact is less than Significant.
d) No Impact. The City of Wildomar owns and manages four public parks with a combined acreage of

14.27 acres: Marna O’Brien Park, Regency Heritage Park, Windsong Park, and Malaga Park. In addition to the proposed project, which would result in a 27-acre park, the City is also proposing to develop an 11- acre park. The City requires 3 acres of neighborhood and community parkland per 1,000 residents as per the City of Wildomar Municipal Code Section 16.20.020 Park and recreation fees and dedications. The proposed project is not projected to add new residents as the proposed project would not construct residential uses. The proposed project would increase parkland in the City to accommodate existing and future population growth. Therefore, no impact would occur. e) No Impact. Demand for public facilities, such as library services, are typically generated by residential uses. The proposed project would not construct residential uses, but would result in the development of a park which would serve the existing and future population of the City. Therefore, no impact.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
None required.

MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
682
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 89

16. Recreation
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Impact
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational facilities
such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?

b) Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?


DISCUSSION
a) No Impact. See response to Section V.15.d, Public Services, above. The proposed project would not result in a direct increase in population growth as the proposed project would not construct housing.

Typically, residential uses result in a higher demand for recreational facilities compared to other uses. The proposed project would result in a park with associated recreational facilities, which would reduce impacts to other existing neighborhood and regional parks. Therefore, no impacts would occur. b) Less Than Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would result in the provision of new recreational facilities through the implementation of a 27-acre park on the project site. The construction of the park and related recreational amenities are included as part of the proposed project.

The construction of the proposed project would not result in an adverse physical effect on the environment beyond what is analyzed in this IS/MND. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
None required.

MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
683
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 90

17. Transportation
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Impact
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?

b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines §15064.3, subdivision (b)?

c) Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?

d) Result in inadequate emergency access? 
Trip Generation
Trip generation represents the amount of traffic that is attracted and produced by a development based on the specific land uses planned for a given project. Trip generation rates for the proposed project are shown in Table 17-1, Project Trip Generation, based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition, 2021). The land use categories provided in Table 17-1 are the uses that best match those of the proposed project and are identified in the ITE Manual. 684
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 91
Table 17-1 Project Trip Generation
Weekday Saturday Sunday
Total AM
Peak
PM
Peak
Total Peak
Hour
Total Peak
Hour
Public Park (Land Use Code:
411)
Total Average Daily Trips
22 2 3 53 8 60 9
Recreation Community Center
(Land Use Code: 495)
Total Average Daily Trips
82 6 9 56 8 37 5
Fire and Rescue (Land Use
Code: 575)
Total Average Daily Trips
14 2 2 14 2 14 2
Proposed Project Total
Average Daily Trips
118 10 14 123 18 111 16
Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021). a) Less Than Significant Impact. As shown in Table 17-1, the proposed project is anticipated to generate a total of 118 weekday trips with 10 peak AM trips and 14 peak PM trips, a total of 123 Saturday trips with 18 peak hour trips, and a total of 111 Sunday trips with 16 peak hour trips.

Public Transit, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Plans
The project area is served by RTA bus Route 23 which provides service for the cities of Wildomar, Murrieta, and Temecula (RTA 2022a). The closest bus stop is the Clinton Keith Wildomar Trail (North) bus stop, which is approximately 0.65-mile south of the project site, at the intersection of Clinton Keith Road and Wildomar Trail. Since the project site is not located directly along RTA Route 23, the proposed project would not result in changes to its route or operations.

The proposed project includes the installation of an onsite bicycle track and onsite sidewalks/pathways, as well as sidewalks along Wildomar Trail, La Estrella Street, and Susan Drive. The construction and operation phases of the proposed project would be contained within the project site and subsequently would not interfere with the use of existing sidewalks, bike lanes, or public transit.

The proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan’s goals and policies, and the proposed project is not found to result in conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs, nor is it expected to negatively affect the performance or safety of existing or planned pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facilities.

Any additional proposed changes to bicycle and pedestrian facilities would be consistent with City development standards and would be checked for compliance as part of the City’s review process.

Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any policies, plans, or programs related to public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities.

Impacts would be less than significant.
685
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 92
Roadways and Intersections
Automobile delay, as described by Level of Service (LOS) or other measurements of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion, is no longer considered a significant impact under CEQA. However, the City uses LOS to determine the appropriate size of roadways and the need for intersection improvements. If the proposed project is projected to exceed the City’s LOS standard, improvements may be required as part of the project to address the traffic impact. As CEQA must evaluate the whole of the project, physical impacts to the environment such as changes to offsite facilities from either a mitigation measure or condition of approval must also be evaluated.

The City will require that the following offsite improvements be made as part of the proposed project, and that the proposed project will construct the following improvements:
• Half-width frontage improvements on La Estrella Street, Susan Drive, and Wildomar Trail, which may include, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting improvements, and pavement widening.

While unlikely, cultural resources could be uncovered as part of the excavation for offsite improvements. Mitigation Measures TRI-1 through TRI-8 will address any finds during construction. All other impacts would be construction related and addressed by the appropriate mitigation measures in this initial study. Impacts associated with transportation would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
b) Less Than Significant Impact. According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 subdivision (b), vehicle miles traveled (VMT) exceeding an applicable threshold of significance may indicate a significant impact.

The City’s VMT guidelines state that VMT analyses are not required for projects that generate 110 trips or less. While the proposed project would generate a total of 118 weekday trips, 123 Saturday trips, and 111 Sunday trips, which would exceed the City’s VMT guidelines of 110 trips, and therefore, require the preparation of a VMT analysis, the proposed project is a community-serving use. As such, VMT would be reduced because the proposed project would reduce the need for residents to travel outside the City for recreational facilities. The proposed project would serve City of Wildomar residents who may have otherwise traveled outside the City to use recreational facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
c) Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Wildomar implements development standards designed to ensure standard engineering practices are used for all improvements. The proposed project would include six driveways: two along Wildomar Trail, one along La Estrella Street, and three along Susan Drive. The proposed project would provide access to passenger vehicles on all driveways, except the middle driveway on Susan drive. The proposed project would be reviewed for compliance with these standards as part of the City’s review process. Additionally, the implementation of the offsite roadway improvements, as mentioned in Section V.17.a, and adherence to all applicable standards would ensure that roadway hazards are reduced, and impacts are less than significant. d) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would provide six driveways that would provide access to the site: two along Wildomar Trail, one along La Estrella Street, and three along Susan Drive. 686
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 93
Ingress and egress for the project site would be reviewed by the City and the CAL FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department to ensure there is sufficient emergency access provided at the site as required by the City of Wildomar Municipal Code 8.28, Fire Code, for compliance with the California Fire Code. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

1. As required by Municipal Code section 8.28, Fire Code, review of the project design by the City and CAL FIRE / Riverside County Fire Department is required to ensure adequate emergency access.

2. As part of the proposed project, the City will also construct the following improvements: halfwidth frontage improvements on La Estrella Street, Susan Drive, and Wildomar Trail, which may include, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting improvements, pavement widening, and sewer and potable water main extensions.

MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
687
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 94

18. Tribal Cultural Resources
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Impact
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code § 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or

ii) A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code §
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth
in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code
§ 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider
the significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe.


DISCUSSION
a
i, ii) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site does not contain any structures or resources that are listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(k) (see Section V.5, above).

The results of the Sacred lands File research conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the project site were negative (ECORP 2023b).

Assembly Bill (AB) 52 established a formal consultation process for California tribes within the CEQA process. The AB 52 specifies that any project that may affect or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource would require a lead agency to “begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditional and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project.” Section 21074 of AB 52 also defines 688
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 95
tribal cultural resources as sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe and that are either listed on, or eligible for, the California Register of Historical Resources or a local historic register, or the lead agency chooses to treat the resource as a significant resource.

The City notified tribes that requested to be alerted of new projects on June 5, 2023, which included the Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Pechanga Band of Mission Indians, Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians, and Soboba Band of Mission Indians.

On June 7, 2023, the Soboba Band of Mission Indians notified the City that the project site falls within the Traditional Use Area of the tribe. The City consulted with the Soboba Band of Mission Indians on June 15, 2023, and asked to join the field surveys conducted for the Cultural Resources Report.

On June 22, 2023, the Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians informed the City that no cultural resource information is available to share and that the Tribe has no comments, nor did the Tribe request consultation.

On June 27, 2023, the Pechanga Band of Indians requested to begin consultation. The tribe requested that any resources found on the project site be reburied onsite. The City has prepared a map identifying the reburial sites; the reburial sites must be areas that cannot be subject to future development, paving, flooding, or erosion. This map will be part of the Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) and remain confidential to protect the resource(s).

The City works closely with the tribes and consults on all projects before the City. The Pechanga Band of Mission Indians provided cultural and tribal mitigation measure language which the Soboba Band of Mission Indians agreed upon. These mitigation measures have been incorporated into this IS/MND. With the inclusion of Mitigation Measures TRI-1 through TRI-8 and CUL-1, impacts to tribal cultural resources would be mitigated to a less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
None required.

MITIGATION MEASURES
Refer to mitigation measure CUL-1 in section V.5 of this document.

TRI-1 Inadvertent Archeological Find. If during ground disturbance activities, cultural resources are discovered that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, the following procedures shall be followed. Cultural resources are defined, as being multiple artifacts in close association with each other, but also include fewer artifacts if the area of the find is determined to be of significance due to its sacred or cultural importance as determined 689
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 96
in consultation with the lead agency and Native American Tribe(s) that elected to consult under AB 52 (“Consulting Tribe(s)”).
a. All ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resources shall be halted until a meeting is convened between the developer, the archaeologist, the tribal representative(s) and the Community Development Director to discuss the significance of the find.
b. At the meeting, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed and after consultation with the tribal representative(s), developer, and the archaeologist, a decision shall be made, with the concurrence of the Community Development Director, as to the appropriate mitigation (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resources.
c. Grading or further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors if needed.
d. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Treatment and Monitoring Agreements entered into with the Consulting Tribe(s) and the applicant. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in-place preservation of cultural resources located in native soils and/or re-burial on the Project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity as identified in Mitigation Measures TRI-2 and TRI-7. e. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan (see Mitigation Measure TRI-6) shall be prepared by the project archeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the said plan.
f. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and tribal cultural resources. If the landowner and the Consulting Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or tribal cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the Community Development Director for decision. The City’s Community Development Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological and tribal cultural resources, recommendations of the project archeologist, and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Consulting Tribe(s). Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council.

Timing/Implementation: During any ground-disturbing or construction activities 690
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 97
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-2 Cultural Resources Disposition. In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries:
a. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the Consulting Tribe(s). Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Wildomar Community Development Department:
i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources. ii. Reburial of the resources on the Project property. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report (see Mitigation Measure TRI-6). The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request. iii. If preservation in place or reburial is not feasible then the resources shall be curated in a culturally appropriate manner at a Riverside County curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources ensuring access and use pursuant to the Guidelines. The collection and associated records shall be transferred, including title, and are to be accompanied by payment of the fees by the Applicant necessary for permanent curation. Evidence of curation in the form of a letter from the curation facility stating that subject archaeological materials have been received and that all fees have been paid, shall be provided by the landowner to the City. There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items, burial goods, and Native American human remains, as defined by the cultural and religious practices of the Most Likely Descendant. Results concerning finds of any inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV monitoring report.

Timing/Implementation: During grading activities
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
691
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 98
TRI-3 Archaeologist Retained. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the project applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA), to monitor all ground disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources.

The developer/permit holder shall submit a fully executed copy of the contract to the Community Development Department to ensure compliance with this condition of approval. Upon verification, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition.

In addition, the Registered Professional Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) in consultation pursuant to the definition in AB 52 to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. A consulting tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Cal Pub Res Code Section 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB52. Details in the Plan shall include:
a. Project grading and development scheduling;
b. The Project archaeologist and the Consulting Tribes(s) shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the City, the construction manager and any contractors and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The Training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the Project and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earthmoving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until the find(s) can be properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols. All new construction personnel that will conduct earthwork or grading activities that begin work on the Project following the initial Training must take the Cultural Sensitivity 692
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 99
Training prior to beginning work and the Project archaeologist and Consulting Tribe(s) shall make themselves available to provide the training on an as-needed basis; c. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s) and Project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.

Timing/Implementation: Prior to issuance of grading permit Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-4 Native American Monitoring (Pechanga). Tribal monitor(s) shall be required on-site during all ground-disturbing activities, including grading, stockpiling of materials, engineered fill, rock crushing, etc. The land divider/permit holder shall retain a qualified tribal monitor(s) from the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a copy of a signed contract between the abovementioned Tribe and the land divider/permit holder for the monitoring of the project to the Community Development Department and to the Engineering Department. The Tribal Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt the grounddisturbance activities to allow recovery of cultural resources, in coordination with the Project Archaeologist.

Timing/Implementation: During ground-disturbing activities Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-5 Native American Monitoring (Soboba). Tribal monitor(s) shall be required on-site during all ground-disturbing activities, including grading, stockpiling of materials, engineered fill, rock crushing, etc. The land divider/permit holder shall retain a qualified tribal monitor(s) from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a copy of a signed contract between the above-mentioned Tribe and the land divider/permit holder for the monitoring of the project to the Community Development Department and to the Engineering Department. The Tribal Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt the ground-disturbance activities to allow recovery of cultural resources, in coordination with the Project Archaeologist.

Timing/Implementation: During ground-disturbing activities Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
693
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 100
TRI-6 Archeology Report - Phase III and IV. Prior to final inspection, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the Project Archeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Phase III Data Recovery report (if required for the Project) and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring Report. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre-grade meeting. The Community Development Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition. Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California Riverside (UCR) and one (1) copy shall be submitted to the Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s).

Timing/Implementation: Prior to final inspection
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Wildomar Public Works and Engineering Department and Community Development Department
TRI-7 Non-Disclosure of Reburial Locations. It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains or associated grave goods shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. The Coroner, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r)., parties, and Lead Agencies, will be asked to withhold public disclosure information related to such reburial, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r).

19. Utilities and Service Systems
Issues, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction
of new or expanded water, wastewater
treatment or storm water drainage, electric
power, natural gas, or telecommunications
facilities, the construction or relocation of which
could cause significant environmental effects?

b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and multiple dry
years?

c) Result in a determination by the waste water
treatment provider, which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to serve
the project’s projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?

d) Generate solid waste in excess of state or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?

e) Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?


DISCUSSION
a,c) Less Than Significant Impact.

Wastewater Treatment
The EVMWD currently operates three wastewater treatment facilities: The Regional Water Reclamation Facility (WRF), the Horsethief Canyon Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), and the Railroad Canyon WWTP (EVMWD 2021). In addition, flow in the southern part of the EVMWD’s service area is treated at the Santa Rosa Water Reclamation Facility operated by the Rancho California Water District. The project site is within the Regional WRF wastewater collection area (EVMWD 2016). 695
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 102
To determine future demand for wastewater facilities, the EVMWD relies on recommended generation factors specified in the 2016 Sewer System Master Plan. The recommended generation rates are determined according to land use designation. The wastewater generation rate in Table 4-8, Calibrated Wastewater Duty and Generation Factors, of the 2016 Sewer System Master Plan is 706 gallons per day (gpd)/acre for General Plan land use designation of Public Institutional land use designation (EVMWD 2016). As the project site covers approximately 27 acres, the proposed wastewater generation for the site would be 19,062 gpd.

The proposed project would connect to an existing 8-inch sewer line in La Estrella Street. The project site is located within the Regional Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) service area. The Regional WRF has an average daily intake of 5.46 million gallons per day (mgd) with a flow capacity of 8 mgd and a peak flow capacity of 17.6 mdg (EVMWD 2016). Therefore, the Regional WRF has an excess daily intake capacity of approximately 2.54 mgd. In addition, the Regional WRF also has a planned capacity expansion to 4 mgd (EVMWD 2021).

The proposed project would result in an increase of approximately 0.75 percent1 of the remaining design capacity of the Regional WRF. With the planned capacity expansion at the plant, the increase in wastewater by the proposed project is considered less than significant. The proposed project would not require or result in the construction or expansion of any new sewage treatment facilities. The proposed project impacts to wastewater treatment are less than significant.

Water Treatment
Water treatment facilities filter and/or disinfect water before it is delivered to customers. The EVMWD supplies water to the surrounding area and would supply water to the project site. Water line improvements at the project site would be constructed in accordance with Title 13, Public Services, of the Wildomar Municipal Code. The proposed project would connect to the waterlines on Wildomar Trail and La Estrella Street.

EVMWD purchases water from the Western Municipal Water District (WMWD). The imported water is a blend of Colorado River water, State Water Project water, and local Western supplies (EVMWD 2021).

The water provided by WMWD is treated by EVMWD prior to it being distributed to their customers. The EVMWD water treatment facilities, their capacities, and remaining available treatment capacities are shown in Table 19-1, EVMWD Water Treatment Facilities.
1 19,062 gpd / 2,540,000 gpd = 0.0075 = 0.75 percent.
696
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 103
Table 19-1 EVMWD Water Treatment Facilities
Treatment Plant Capacity
(mgd)
Maximum Flow
(mgd)
Remaining
Treatment
Capacity (mgd)
Canyon Lake Water Treatment Plant 7 7 0
Skinner Filtration Plant (via the Auld
Valley Pipeline) 20.2 14.5 5.7
Mills Filtration Plant (via the Temescal
Valley Pipeline)

12.7 8.9 3.8
Total 39.9 30.4 9.5
Source: EVMWD 2021
As shown in Table 19-1, the EVMWD water treatment facilities have a remaining water treatment capacity of approximately 9.5 mgd. Based on water generations rates in Table 4-8, Calibrated Wastewater Duty and Generation Factors, of the Sewer System Master Plan, the water demand for the proposed project’s uses would be 1,700 gpd/acre for Public Institutional land use designation (EVMWD 2016). The total proposed water demand for 27 acres of the site would be 45,900 gpd (EVMWD 2016). This is approximately 0.52 percent2 of the remaining treatment capacity of the EVMWD water treatment facilities. Therefore, based on water demands of the project, the current capacity of the EVMWD treatment facilities would be able to accommodate the water demands generated from the proposed project. The proposed project impacts to water treatment is less than significant.

Stormwater Drainage
Stormwater drainage impacts are addressed in section V.10.c.iii, above. The proposed development would be approximately 37 percent impervious3
. Runoff from the proposed project would be directed to the biofiltration and bioretention basins within the drainage management areas onsite, and flow into the existing and proposed storm drains (see Figure 5). Additionally, implementation of BMPs would improve water quality and reduce runoff. Stormwater drainage improvements associated with the proposed project have been designed to not impact the local, off-site storm drain system. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Electricity and Natural Gas
The proposed project would require connection to utilities such as natural gas lines in the vicinity of the site in accordance the installation requirements of City of Wildomar Municipal Code Section 16.40.010.

The City would be responsible for the payment of electricity and gas connections as well as use of the utility. As described in Section V.6, Energy, the proposed project would not result in energy use such that new or expanded facilities would be required. Therefore, impacts are less than significant. 2 45,900 gpd / 8,800,000 gpd = 0.00529 = 0.52 percent
3 434,000 square feet / 1,176,120 square feet x 100 = 36.9 percent 697
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 104
The installation of all utilities will be installed per the requirements of the service providers. b) Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is within the service boundary of the EVMWD. The EVMWD utilizes both groundwater and imported water supplies to ensure adequate water is available for consumers. Imported water is utilized to ensure that significant overdraft of local groundwater supplies does not occur. Imported water is obtained from the Metropolitan Water District, local surface water from Canyon Lake, and local groundwater from the Elsinore Basin. Since the adoption of the 2005 Groundwater Management Plan, EVMWD has limited pumping to 5,500 acre-ft/year to be consistent with the safe yield of the Elsinore Groundwater Basin (EVMWD 2021). The EVMWD has the ability to obtain a capacity of 26,296 acre-feet per year (23.4 mgd) during average years and wet years (EVMWD 2021).

As shown in the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, the projected 2025 water demand and supply would be 38,932 acre-feet per year and 47,218 acre-feet per year, respectively (EVMWD 2021). The supply would exceed the demand by 8,286 acre-feet/year. Therefore, this impact is less than significant because there would be sufficient water supply to meet the demand of the proposed project.

The California State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) requires local agencies to adopt, implement, and enforce the MWELO or a local Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO) that is at least as effective as the MWELO. Chapter 17.276 of the City of Wildomar Municipal Code implements the MWELO and requires that a landscape documentation package be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of any permits to install or construct any landscape-related improvements. This ensures that landscapes are planned, designed, installed, maintained, and managed in a manner that uses water efficiently, encourages water conservation, and prevents water waste.

Compliance with the City’s ordinance would additionally help to reduce impacts on water supplies and ensure that water resources would be available for the foreseeable future of the project. Impacts would be less than significant.
d) Less Than Significant Impact. The main solid waste disposal site that would serve the project site is the El Sobrante Landfill in Corona. The landfill is projected to reach its full capacity of 209,910,000 cubic yards in 2051 (CalRecycle 2023a). The El Sobrante Landfill has a remaining capacity of 143,977,170 tons (CalRecycle 2023a).

The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery’s most recent solid waste generation rates for Public/Institutional uses is 0.007 pounds per square foot per day (lb/sq ft/day) (CalRecycle 2023b). Therefore, the proposed project would generate an estimated 8,232 lb/day of solid waste4 .This
increase would be 0.03 percent5 of the landfill’s daily maximum permitted throughput and could be accommodated. Therefore, the project impacts on landfill capacity are less than significant. 4 0.007 lb/sq ft/day x 1,176,120 square feet = 8,232 lbs/day 5 8,323 lb/day = 4.116 ton/day

4.116 tons/day / 16,054 tons/day = 0.025 percent.
698
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 105
e) Less Than Significant Impact. Solid waste would be generated during construction and operation of the proposed project. The Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act of 1991 requires that adequate areas be provided for collecting and loading recyclable materials such as paper, products, glass, and other recyclables. City of Wildomar Municipal Code Section 8.104 regulates solid waste handling and mandates that sufficient receptacles be in place onsite to accommodate refuse and recycling. Compliance with State law and the City’s Municipal Code would ensure the project would result in a less than significant impact.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

1. As required by City of Wildomar Municipal Code Section 13.12.050, Regulatory Consistency, and the MS4 Permit from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, stormwater drainage improvements must be consistent and in accordance with these provisions.

MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
699
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 106

20. Wildfire
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?

b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose
project occupants to pollutant concentrations
from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?

c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or
other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or
that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts
to the environment?

d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?

a) Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. California Government Code Chapter 6.8 directs the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) to identify areas of very high fire hazard severity within Local Responsibility Areas (LRA). Mapping of the areas, referred to as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ), is based on data and models of potential fuels over a 30- to 50-year time horizon and their associated expected fire behavior and expected burn probabilities, which quantifies the likelihood and nature of vegetation fire exposure to buildings. LRA VHFHSZ maps were initially developed in the mid-1990s and are now being updated based on improved science, mapping techniques, and data. In 2008, the California Building Standards Commission adopted California Building Code Chapter 7A requiring new buildings in Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones to use ignition-resistant construction methods and materials.

The eastern and western portions of the City of Wildomar have been designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ). The project site is within a VHFHSZ within the LRA (CAL FIRE 2023). Development on the project site would be subject to compliance with the 2022 CBC and 2022 CFC, or the current version of the CBC and CFC at the time of construction. Wildomar is covered under the County of Riverside Emergency Operations Plan and the Riverside County Operation Area Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard 700
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 107
Mitigation Plan (Riverside County 2019; Riverside County 2023). These plans provide guidance to effectively respond to any emergency, including wildfires. In addition, all proposed construction is required to meet minimum standards for fire safety. Implementation of these plans and policies in conjunction with compliance with the Fire Code would minimize the risk of loss due to wildfires.

Furthermore, the proposed project would not conflict with adopted emergency response or evacuation plans. The surrounding roadways would continue to provide emergency access to the project site and surroundings during construction and postconstruction. In addition, as with all projects in the City of Wildomar, Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 which require conformance with the CBC and CFC, would be implemented. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
b) Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is vacant and contains minimal vegetation. The topography of the site generally drains from northeast to southwest (Ninyo and Moore 2021). The City does not experience high-speed prevailing winds; average wind speeds are approximately 6 miles per hour during the windier part of the year, from November to June (Weather Spark 2023).

Developing the existing vacant and undeveloped site with the proposed structures, pathways, and other impervious surfaces would reduce the amount of exposed vegetation that could be used as fuel compared to existing conditions. Therefore, the proposed project and site conditions would not contribute to an increase in exposure to wildfire risk. Additionally, development on the project site would be subject to compliance with the CBC and CFC. Moreover, the City of Wildomar is under the Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, which provides guidance to effectively respond to and mitigate emergencies, including wildfires. The project site is within a VHFHSZ, and as with all projects in the City of Wildomar, Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2, which require conformance with the CBC and CFC, would be implemented. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
c) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would require connections to existing utility lines (such as electricity, water, and sewer) along the surrounding roadways. The utilities would be installed to meet service requirements. The construction of new and improved infrastructure for the proposed project would not directly increase fire risk, and impacts are less than significant. d) Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Section V.10, the project site is not within a flood hazard zone. There are no flooding or safety concerns caused by drainage. Additionally, as discussed in Section V.7, there is no evidence of seismically-induced landslides and slope instability onsite (Ninyo and Moore 2021).

Construction activities related to the proposed project would be subject to compliance with the CBC and CFC, and would include BMPs. BMPs may include but are not limited to covering of the soil, use of a dustinhibiting material, landscaping, use of straw and jute, hydroseeding, and grading in a pattern that slows stormwater flow and reduces the potential for erosion, landslides, and downstream flooding.

Operationally, the proposed project would be designed to preserve the natural topography to the extent 701
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 108
possible, including the preservation of natural drainage courses. Therefore, with implementation of BMPs, impacts are less than significant.

STANDARD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
None Required.

MITIGATION MEASURES
Implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 in Section V.9 of this document. 702
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 109
VII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Issues, does the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory?

b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable
future projects.)

c) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?


DISCUSSION
The following mandatory findings of significance are in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15065. a) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the evaluations and discussion in this IS/MND, the proposed project has a very limited potential to incrementally degrade the quality of the environment. As discussed in Section V.4, Biological Resources, implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 through BIO-5 would reduce impacts to nesting birds, burrowing owl, crotch bumble bee, and drainage features to less than significant.
703
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 110
As discussed in Section V.5, Cultural Resources, with implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and TRI-1 through TRI-8, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on archaeological resources and human remains with mitigation incorporated.

Furthermore, as discussed in Section V.7, Geology and Soils, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on paleontological resources with implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-2, which requires a paleontological grading observation schedule during grading.

Moreover, with implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and TRI-1 through TRI-8, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on tribal cultural resources. b) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated.

Aesthetics
Implementation of the proposed project would not contribute to cumulative visual resource or aesthetic impacts. The proposed project and other projects in Wildomar are required to comply with the City’s light pollution ordinance. The project is proposed in a developing region of the City and is consistent with the proposed General Plan designation. While the proposed structures may obstruct views of surrounding ridgelines from the project site, the proposed project, in combination with other development in the vicinity would not significantly impact any scenic vistas. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than cumulatively considerable impact to aesthetics.

Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Implementation of the proposed project would not result in any impacts to agriculture or forestry resources and would therefore not contribute to cumulative impacts to these resources.

Air Quality
The South Coast Air Quality Management District’s approach for assessing cumulative impacts is based on the Air Quality Management Plan forecasts for attainment of ambient air quality standards in accordance with the requirements of the federal and California Clean Air acts. In other words, the South Coast AQMD considers projects that are consistent with the AQMP, which is intended to bring the basin into attainment for all criteria pollutants, to also have less than significant cumulative impacts. The discussion in Section V.3, Air Quality, describes the South Coast AQMD criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP and further demonstrates that the proposed project would be consistent with the plan. Implementation of the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts, and would not contribute to cumulative impacts to Air Quality.

Cumulative Short-Term Emissions
The SCAB is designated nonattainment for O3, PM10, and PM2.5 for State standards and nonattainment for O3 and PM2.5 for Federal standards. The project construction‐related emissions by themselves would not have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD significance thresholds for criteria pollutants. Since these thresholds indicate whether individual project emissions have the potential to affect cumulative regional air quality, project‐related construction emissions would not be cumulatively considerable. The 704
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 111
South Coast AQMD has developed strategies to reduce criteria pollutant emissions outlined in the AQMP pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act mandates. With the compliance of these strategies, the proposed project would not exceed thresholds by the South Coast AQMD.

South Coast AQMD rules, mandates, and compliance with adopted AQMP emissions control measures are imposed on all construction projects throughout the air basin. Compliance with South Coast AQMD rules and regulations would reduce the proposed project construction‐related impacts to a less than significant level. Therefore, project‐related construction emissions, in combination with those from other projects in the area, would not substantially deteriorate the local air quality. Construction emissions associated with the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant cumulative air quality impacts.

Cumulative Long-Term Impacts
The South Coast AQMD has not established separate significance thresholds for cumulative operational emissions. The nature of air emissions is largely a cumulative impact. As a result, no single project is sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of ambient air quality standards. Instead, individual project emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. The South Coast AQMD developed the operational thresholds of significance based on the level above which individual project emissions would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the SCAB’s existing air quality conditions. Therefore, a project that exceeds the South Coast AQMD operational thresholds would also be a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative impact.

With the implementation of applicable South Coast AQMD rules and regulations, the proposed project’s operational emissions would not exceed South Coast AQMD thresholds as they would alleviate potential impacts related to cumulative conditions on a project-by-project basis. As a result, operational emissions associated with the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant cumulative air quality impacts. Project operations would not contribute a cumulatively considerable net increase of any nonattainment criteria pollutant.

Biological Resources
The project site is primarily vacant and undeveloped, and is not within a Criteria Cell. The project site is located within the Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Fee Plan Area and MSHCP Fee Area. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 through BIO-5 would reduce impacts to nesting birds, burrowing owl, crotch bumble bee, and drainage features to less than significant. The proposed project would pay the MSHCP fees as required to ensure that there would be a less than cumulatively considerable impact on biological resources with mitigation incorporated. As the proposed park is a Public Works project, payment of Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat fees are not required.

Cultural Resources
Development of the project site would contribute to a cumulative increase in potential impacts to cultural and archaeological resources. Other projects in the region could demolish or otherwise alter cultural resources. However, Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and TRI-1 through TRI-8 would reduce the potential impacts associated with development on the project site. Other projects in the region would also be 705
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 112
required to comply with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, which requires the lead agency to determine if discovered resources are unique or historically significant, and if so, to avoid or mitigate impacts to such resources in accordance with the provisions of PRC Section 21083.2. Therefore, the project would have a less than cumulatively considerable impact with mitigation incorporated.

Energy
Construction and operation of the proposed project would result in an increase in energy use as the site is currently vacant. Construction energy use would be temporary and normal of development in the region. Section V.6, Energy, analyzed the project’s contribution to energy in the region and determined the project would have a less than cumulatively considerable environmental impact to energy.

Geology and Soils
Project-related impacts on geology and soils associated with development on the project site are site specific, and project development would not contribute to seismic hazards or soil erosion.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1 would result in decreased exposure to the risks associated with seismic activity, and implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-2 would ensure impacts to paleontological resources are reduced to a less than significant level. Therefore, impacts are expected to be less than cumulatively considerable with mitigation incorporated.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The greenhouse gas analysis in Section V.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, analyzed the proposed project’s cumulative contribution to global climate change and determined that the project would have a less than cumulatively considerable environmental impact resulting from greenhouse gas emissions.

Regarding goals for 2050 under Executive Order S‐3‐05, at this time it is not possible to quantify the emissions savings from future regulatory measures, as they have not yet been developed. Nevertheless, it is anticipated that operation of the proposed project would comply with all applicable measures that state lawmakers decide would lead to an 80 percent reduction below 1990 levels by2050.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
The proposed project is not expected to utilize or contribute to hazards associated with the accidental release of hazardous materials. The proposed project is within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone; implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 would ensure that the proposed project complies with the California Building Code, Fire Code, and City standards in regard to fire hazards. All development within the VHFHSZ of the City is required to comply with the California Building Code, Fire Code, and City standards Compliance with federal, state, and local regulations would ensure that cumulative hazard conditions are less than cumulatively considerable with mitigation incorporated.

Hydrology and Water Quality
Water quality measures included in the proposed project and the SWPPP for the project would ensure that the quantity and quality of water discharged from the site during both construction and operational activities do not adversely affect any off-site uses or water resources. The site is not located within a flood 706
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 113
hazard zone. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than cumulatively considerable impact related to hydrology.

Land Use and Planning
The proposed project would not divide an established community. The proposed project would comply with the standards for its zoning designation as listed in the Wildomar Municipal Code. As the proposed project would not change the zoning or land use designations for the site, the proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan thereby reducing physical impacts. Cumulative development projects in accordance with the General Plan would be subject to compliance with regional and local plans. Other cumulative development would be reviewed by the City to ensure general consistency with local land use plans. Therefore, the proposed project combined with related projects would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts to land use and planning.

Mineral Resources
The proposed project would have no impact related to mineral resources and would therefore not contribute to any cumulative impacts to such resources.

Noise
As discussed in section V.13, Noise, the proposed project would comply with all applicable noise standards and would have less than significant direct impacts related to construction and operational noise. It is possible that other construction projects in the vicinity could overlap with activity on the proposed project site, but other such projects are required to mitigate their construction noise impacts and comply with the City’s noise ordinances. Any combined impacts would be temporary, constituting intermittent annoyance perhaps, but not a significant cumulative noise impact. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than cumulatively considerable impact related to construction noise.

Implementation of the proposed project, in combination with other existing, planned, proposed, approved, and reasonably foreseeable development in the immediate area, may increase operational noise levels in the project area. However, as project generated vehicle traffic does not raise the ambient noise level from below the applicable standard to above the applicable standard (60 dBA CNEL for singlefamily residential uses), operational noise impacts to less than cumulatively considerable. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than cumulatively considerable impact related to operational noise.

Population and Housing
As the project site is currently vacant, no housing units or people would be displaced, and the construction of replacement housing is not required. The proposed project would increase the employment opportunities in the City which are expected to be filled by the local labor pool during construction.

Therefore, the project would have a less than cumulatively considerable impact related to population and housing.
707
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 114
Public Services
Implementation of the proposed project, in combination with other existing, planned, proposed, approved, and reasonably foreseeable development in the immediate area, may increase the demand for public services such as fire and police protection. However, as a standard condition of approval, project applicants/developers are required to pay development impact fees to fund the expansion of such services. Development of any future public service facilities would be subject to CEQA review prior to approval that would identify and address any resulting impacts. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than cumulatively considerable impact on public services.

Recreation
The proposed project would result in the development of a park that would serve residents in the City. As such, the proposed project would not substantially impact recreational facilities and would therefore not contribute to any cumulative impacts to such facilities. Additionally, as a standard condition of approval, the project applicants/developers of other developments in the City are required to pay development impact fees to fund the expansion of such facilities. Development of any future public facilities would be subject to CEQA review prior to approval that would identify and address any resulting impacts. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact on recreational facilities.

Transportation
Cumulative traffic impacts are created because of a combination of the proposed project and other future developments contributing to the overall traffic impacts and requiring additional improvements to maintain acceptable level of service operations. A project’s contribution to a cumulatively significant impact can be reduced to less than significant if the project implements or funds its fair share of improvements designed to alleviate the potential cumulative impact.

As part of the proposed project, the City will also construct the following improvements: half-width frontage improvements on La Estrella Street, Susan Drive, and Wildomar Trail, which may include curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting improvements, pavement widening, and sewer and potable water main extensions.

VMT in the City would be reduced because the proposed project would reduce the need for residents to travel outside the City for recreational facilities. The proposed project would serve City of Wildomar residents who may have otherwise traveled outside the City to use recreational facilities. Therefore, the proposed project’s transportation impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable.

Tribal Cultural Resources
Development of the project site would contribute to a cumulative increase in potential impacts to cultural, tribal cultural, and archaeological resources. However, Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and TRI-1 through TRI8 would reduce the potential impacts to tribal cultural resources associated with development on the project site. As with the proposed project, each related cumulative project would be required to comply with AB 52 and PRC Section 21083.2(i), which addresses accidental discoveries of archaeological sites and 708
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 115
resources, including tribal cultural resources, and would be required to implement Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and TRI-1 through TRI-8. Therefore, any discoveries of tribal cultural resources caused by the project or related projects would be mitigated to a less than significant level. Therefore, the project would have a less than cumulatively considerable impact with mitigation incorporated.

Utilities and Service Systems
Implementation of the proposed project would increase demand for public utilities. However, the proposed project would not result in a significant increase in utility demand and would be accounted for in long-range plans for the provision of such services, as provided in the General Plan. Therefore, the proposed project would have less than cumulatively considerable impacts on utilities and service systems.

Wildfire
The project site is located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 and compliance with the California Building Code, Fire Code, and other applicable federal, state, and local regulations would ensure that cumulative hazard conditions are less than cumulatively considerable with mitigation incorporated. c) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project does not have the potential to significantly adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly. Although a number of impacts were identified as having potential to significantly impact humans, with implementation of the identified mitigation measures, and implementation of standard conditions and requirements, these impacts are less than significant. With implementation of the identified mitigation measures, the proposed project is not expected to cause significant adverse impacts to humans. This mitigation measure is Mitigation Measure GEO-1 to reduce impacts associated with earthquake faults and soils hazards.

Therefore, the project does not have any environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Furthermore, this document analyzes long-term and short-term impacts and mitigates all potential impacts to a less than significant level; therefore, the proposed project would not achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. Any impacts are considered less than significant with mitigation incorporated. 709
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 116
I. REFERENCES
California Department of Conservation (CDC). 2022. California Important Farmland Finder. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). 2023, April 17 (accessed). FHSZ Viewer. https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2023. Envirostor. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2022. Scenic Highway Systems List. https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap-landscape-architecture-and-community-livability/lapliv-i-scenic-highways California Department of Conservation (CDC). 2016. Mines Online Map. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/mol/.
______. 2023, April 4 (accessed). California Williamson Act Enrollment Finder. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/WilliamsonAct/App/index.html California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2023a. Facility/Site Summary Details: El Sobrante Landfill (33-AA-0217).
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/2280?siteID=2402. _______. 2023b. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastecharacterization/general/rates California Department of Water Resources (DWR). 2023. SGMA Basin Prioritization Dashboard. https://gis.water.ca.gov/app/bp-dashboard/final/#.

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2023, April 13 (accessed). GeoTracker. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress.

ECORP Consulting, Inc. (ECORP). 2023a, July. Biological Technical Report and Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency Analysis. Appendix 3. _____. 2023b, July. Archaeological Resources Inventory Report. Appendix 4. _____. 2023c, June. Noise Impact Assessment. Appendix 6.

Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). 2023, March 30. Director Division Boundary Maps. https://www.evmwd.com/home/showpublisheddocument/666/637951137826130000, _______. 2016. 2016 Sewer System Master Plan.
https://www.evmwd.com/home/showpublisheddocument/1773/637486585053570000 _______. 2021. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan.
https://www.evmwd.com/home/showpublisheddocument/2363/637605786821270000 710
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 117
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2023, May 8 (accessed). UST Finder. https://epa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=b03763d3f2754461adf86f121 345d7bc
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2008, August 28. Flood Map Number 06065C2705G. https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery=estrella%20street%2C%20wildomar#search resultsanchor.

Ninyo and Moore. 2021, March 26. Geotechnical Evaluation. Appendix 5.

PlaceWorks. 2023, June 29. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment. Appendix 2.

Riverside County Information Technology (RCIT). Map My County. 2023. https://rivcoparcelreport.rivcoca.org/Report?apn=376350009&type=public&url=http://gis1.cou ntyofriverside.us/Geocortex/Essentials/REST/TempFiles/Export.png?guid=b8cbe59f-55dc-4c23- bf29-cc90ad5831bb&contentType=image/png
Riverside County. 2019, August. County of Riverside Emergency Operations Plan. http://riversidecountyca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?Frame=&MeetingID=2048&Me diaPosition=3715.315&ID=10490&CssClass=
_____. 2023, April. Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. https://rivcoready.org/sites/g/files/aldnop181/files/2023- 05/MJLHMP%202023%20Riverside%20FINAL.pdf
Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). 2022a. Riverside Transit Authority Ride Guide- Route 23. https://www.riversidetransit.com/images/DOWNLOADS/MAPS_SCHEDULES_PDFS/Route%2023 %20%7C%20Temecula,%20Murrieta,%20Wildomar.pdf.
_____. 2022b (RTC). Who We Are- Mission Statement. Accessed May 25, 2023. https://www.riversidetransit.com/index.php/about-rta/who-we-are.

Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2020, September 3. Final 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal_demographics-andgrowth-forecast.pdf?1606001579.

Weather Spark. 2023. Average Weather in Wildomar. Accessed May 8, 2023. https://weatherspark.com/y/1910/Average-Weather-in-Wildomar-California-United-StatesYear-Round.

Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (WRCRCA). 2023, March 28 (accessed).

Regional Conservation Authority Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Map. https://wrcrca.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=2b9d4520bd5f4d35add35f b58808c1b7
711
27-Acre Park (CIP 062-1) IS/MND Page 118
Wildomar, City of. 2003. Wildomar General Plan.
http://www.cityofwildomar.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_9894739/File/Government/Departme nts/Planning/General%20Plan.pdf
______. 2015, March. Parks Master Plan.
https://www.cityofwildomar.org/DocumentCenter/View/979/City-of-Wildomar-Parks-MasterPlan-March-2015 ______. 2018. Biennial Operating Budget Fiscal Years 2017-18 & 2018-19. https://cdnsm5- hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_9894739/File/Government/Departments/Financ e/Budgets/Adopted%20Budget%20City%20of%20Wildomar%20web%202017-19.pdf _____. 2020, June. Roadway Network Traffic Data. https://cdnsm5- hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_9894739/File/City%20Services/Public%20Works/2 019%20City%20of%20Wildomar%20ADTs%20and%20LOS.pdf.

United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2023. National Levee Database. https://levees.sec.usace.army.mil/#/.

United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2023, April. Local Area Unemployment Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/web/metro/laummtrk.htm
712
Appendix 2
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
713
Appendix 2.1
CalEEMod Inputs
Worksheet
714
CalEEMod Inputs ‐ Ronald Reagan Park (27‐Acre Park)
Name: Ronald Reagan Park
Land Use Scale: Project/site
Land Use Subtypes: Recreational; Commericial City Park; Government Office Buidling Project Location: North of Ronald Reagan Elementary School on 35445 Wildomar TrailCounty: Riverside‐South Coast Land Use Setting: Rural/Suburban
TAZ: 5536Operational Year: 2025Electric Utility: Southern California EdisonGas Utility: Southern California GasAir Basin: South Coast Air District: South Coast AQMD
Proiect Site Acreage 27.00
Disturbed Site Acreage 18.36
Project Components
New Construction Building Square Feet (SQFT) Building Footprint (BSF) Acres Stories/Levels Fire Station 8,700 8,700 0.20 1
Community Building 8,700 8,700 0.20 1TOTAL 17,400 0.40 ‐ Other Land Uses SQFT Building Footprint Acres Number of Stalls Parking Lot 289,530 NA 6.65 221
Non‐asphalt hardscape 142,798 NA 3.28
Total Hardscape 434,000 NA 9.96Landscaping SQFT AcresLandscaping 350,000 8.03 CalEEMod Land Use Inputs
Land Use Type Land Use Subtype Size Metric Size Lot Acreage Feature Square Feet Landscape Area
Square Feet
Special Landscape
Area Square Feet
Recreational City Park Acre 8.23 8.23 8,700 350,000 0
Commercial Government Office Building 1000 sqft 8.70 0.20 8,700 00 Parking Parking Lot 1000 sqft 289.53 6.65 289,530 00Parking Other Non‐Asphalt Surfaces 1000 sqft 142.80 3.28 142,798 00

18.36 449,728 350,000 0
Appendix 2.1 Page 2.1-1
715
Architectural Coating1
Non‐Residential
Interior Painted (%): 100%
Exterior Painted (%): 100%
South Coast AQMD Rule 1113 < 50 flat / < 50 nonflat
CalEEMod Default grams/liter
Interior Paint VOC content: 50
Exterior Paint VOC content: 50
Notes:
1 CalEEMod default used.

Structures Land Use Square Feet CalEEMod Factor1
Total Paintable
Surface Area
Paintable Interior
Area2
Paintable Exterior
Area2
City Park (Community Building) 8,700 2.0 17,400 13,050 4,350Government Office Building 8,700 2.0 17,400 13,050 4,350 26,100 8,700
Parking3
Parking Lot (Striping) 432,328 6% ‐ 25,940
Totals 26,100 34,640
Notes:
123
CalEEMod Construction Measures/Required Basic Construction Emission Control Practices (BMPs)Construction MitigationSCAQMD Rule 403 Water Exposed Area (during grading) Frequency: 2 per day PM10: 61 % Reduction
PM25: 61 % Reduction
Water Exposed Area Frequency: 2 per day
PM10: 55 % Reduction
PM25: 55 % Reduction
Unpaved Roads Vehicle Speed: 25 mph
44 % Reduction
44 % Reduction
SCAQMD Rule 1186
Clean Paved Road 9 % PM Reduction
Southern California Edison Carbon Intensity Factors
CO2e:1 444.00 pounds per megawatt hour
CH4 0 pound per megawatt hour
N2O 0 pound per megawatt hour
1 CalEEMod assumes the total surface for painting equals 2.0 times the floor square footage for non‐residential use.

CalEEMod methodology calculates the paintable interior and exterior areas by multiplying the total paintable surface area by 75 and 25 percent, respectively.Architectural coatings for the parking lot is based on CalEEMod default.

Based on CO2e intensity factor of 444 pounds per megawatt hour; Southern California Edison. 2022. 2022 Sustainability Report. https://www.edison.com/sustainability/sustainability‐report Appendix 2.1 Page 2.1-2
716
Electricity Use1
Electricity (kWh/year)
Natural Gas
(kBTU/year) Electricity (kWh/year)
Natural Gas
(kBTU/year)
City Park 83,251.17 373,667.61 71,428.74 144,943.74 11,822.43 228,724.74 Fire Station 151,755.60 240,003.89 122,345.43 193,919.28 29,410.16 46,084.61 Parking Lot 253,628.28 0.00 253.628.28 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Apshalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
488,635 613,672 193,774 338,863 41,233 274,809
Notes: 1. City Park energy use defaulted to zero and did not account for the 8,700 sf of community building space. Therefore, the energy use was updated to reflect the CalEEMod defaults for "Racquet Club" in EDFZ 11.

Water Use
Land Use Type
Indoor Water Use
(gals/year)
Include Precipitation?
(y/n)
Outdoor Water Use
(gals/year)
City Park 514,544 y 5,549,499.00
Fire Station 1,728,339 y 0.00
Parking Lot 0 y 0.00
Other Apshalt Surfaces 0 y 0.00
2,242,883 5,549,499
Notes: 1. City Park indoor water use defaulted to zero and did not account for the 8,700 sf of community building space. Therefore, the indoor water use was updated to reflect the CalEEMod defaults for "Racquet Club".

Net Trips
Land Use Type Average Daily Trips CalEEMod Trip Rate Saturday Trips CalEEMod Trip Rate Sunday Trips CalEEMod Trip Rate City Park 104 12.63 109 13.24 97 11.78
Fire Station 14 1.61 14 1.61 14 1.61
118 123 111
Source: ITE Manual Trip Rates
Notes:

Land Use Type
TOTAL Electricity
(kWh/year)
TOTAL Natural Gas
(kBTU/year)
Subject to Title 24 Standards Not Subject to Title 24 Standards For the Fire and Rescue Station, only peak hour trip rates were provided by the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Therefore, as an industry standard, the peak hour trip rates were multiplied by 10 to identify an estimated average daily trip rate. For all other land uses, the ITE Trip Generation Manual rates were used (Codes 411, 495, and 575).

Appendix 2.1 Page 2.1-3
717
Construction Activities Phase Type Start Date End Date CalEEMod Duration (Workday) Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/30/2024 2/13/2024 10Rough Grading Rough Grading 2/14/2024 3/27/2024 30 Building Construction Building Construction 3/28/2024 5/22/2025 300 Asphalt Paving Paving 8/13/2024 6/20/2025 20Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/13/2024 7/19/2025 20Construction Activities Start Date End Date CalEEMod Duration
(Workday)
Site Preparation 1/30/2024 2/13/2024 10Rough Grading 2/14/2024 3/27/2024 30Building Construction 3/28/2024 5/22/2025 300 Asphalt Paving 4/25/2025 5/22/2025 20
Architectural Coating 4/25/2025 5/22/2025 20
Construction Activities Start Date End Date
CalEEMod Duration
(Workday)
Site Preparation 1/30/2024 2/13/2024 10Rough Grading 2/14/2024 3/27/2024 30Building Construction 3/28/2024 4/24/2025 300 Building Construction, Asphalt Paving, and
Architectural Coating 4/25/2025 5/22/2025 20
Construction Activities and Schedule Assumptions: Ronald Reagan Park (27‐Acre Park) Overlapping Construction Schedule (CalEEMod)
Default Construction Schedule
New Construction Schedule (CalEEMod)
Appendix 2.1 Page 2.1-4
718
CalEEMod Construction Off‐Road Equipment Inputs
*Used CalEEMod default equipment.

General Construction Hours: Mon‐Fri and 8:00 AM to 7:00 PM (with 1 hr break) Water Truck Vendor Trip Calculation
Amount of Water (gal/acre/day)1
Water Truck
Capacity
(gallons)2
10,000 4,000
Notes:
1 2
3 CalEEMod Equipment
# of
Equipment hr/day hp load factor
Total
Trips/Day
On‐Site
Water Truck
Travel
Distance
(miles/day)
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8 84 0.37
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 367 0.4
Worker Trips/Day 18
Vendor Trips (Water Truck Refill Trips) 18
Hauling Trips (TOTAL TRIPS) 0
Onsite Trucks (Water Truck) Acres Disturbed 3.50 1 2.9
Grading
Graders 1 8 148 0.41
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 367 0.4
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 84 0.37
Scrapers 2 8 423 0.48
Excavators 2 8 36 0.38
Worker Trips 20
Vendor Trips (Water Truck Refill Trips) 20
Hauling Trips (TOTAL TRIPS) 0
Onsite Trucks (Water Truck) Acres Disturbed 4.00 1 3.3
Building Construction
Cranes 1 7 367 0.29
Forklifts 3 8 82 0.2
Generator Sets 1 7 14 0.74
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 84 0.37
Welders 1 8 46 0.45
Worker Trips 3
Vendor Trips 9
Hauling Trips (TOTAL TRIPS) 0
Asphalt Paving
Pavers 2 8 81 0.42
Rollers 2 6 36 0.38
Paving Equipment 2 6 89 0.36
Worker Trips 15
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips (TOTAL TRIPS) 0
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors 1 6 37 0.48
Worker Trips 1
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips (TOTAL TRIPS) 0
Construction Equipment Details
Based on data provided in Guidance for Application for Dust Control Permit Maricopa County Air Quality Department. 2005, June. Guidance for Application of Dust Control Permit. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019‐ Based on standard water truck capacity:

McLellan Industries. 2022, January (access). Water Trucks. https://www.mclellanindustries.com/trucks/water‐trucks/ Assumes that dozers, tractors/loaders/backhoes, and graders can disturb 0.50 acres per day and scrapers can disturb 1 acre per day.

Appendix 2.1 Page 2.1-5
719
Construction Trips Worksheet
Phase Name
Worker Trip Ends
Per Day
Vendor Trip Ends
Per Day
Total Haul Truck
Trip Ends Start Date End Date Workdays
Site Preparation 18 19 0 1/30/2024 2/13/2024 10
Rough Grading 20 21 0 2/14/2024 3/27/2024 30Building Construction 3 9 0 3/28/2024 5/22/2025 300 Asphalt Paving 15 0 0 4/25/2025 5/22/2025 20Architectural Coating 1 0 0 4/25/2025 5/22/2025 20 Construction Activity (Overlapping)
Worker Trip Ends
Per Day
Vendor Trip Ends
Per Day
Total Trip Ends
Per Day Start Date End Date Workdays
Site Preparation 18 19 0 1/30/2024 2/13/2024 10
Rough Grading 20 21 0 2/14/2024 3/27/2024 30Building Construction 3 9 0 3/28/2024 4/24/2025 300 Building Construction, Asphalt Paving, and Architectural Coating 19 9 0 4/25/2025 5/22/2025 20 Maximum Daily Trips 20 21 1
Appendix 2.1 Page 2.1-6
720
Total AM Peak PM Peak Total Peak Hour Total Peak Hour
Average Daily Rate 27 0.78 0.07 0.11 1.96 0.28 2.19 0.31 Total Average Daily Trips ‐ 22 2 3 53 8 60 9
Entering/Exiting ‐ 11/11 1/1 1/2 26/27 4/4 30/30 4/5
Total AM Peak PM Peak Total Peak Hour Total Peak Hour
Average Daily Rate 3 27.25 1.90 2.71 18.34 2.59 12.03 1.66 Total Average Daily Trips ‐ 82 6 9 56 8 37 5
Entering/Exiting ‐ 41/41 4/2 4/5 28/28 4/4 18/19 2/3
Total AM Peak PM Peak Total Peak Hour Total Peak Hour
Average Daily Rate 3 4.40 0.44 0.44 4.40 0.44 4.40 0.44 Total Average Daily Trips ‐ 14 2 2 14 2 14 2
Entering/Exiting ‐ 7/7 1/1 1/1 7/7 1/1 7/7 1/1
Total AM Peak PM Peak Total Peak Hour Total Peak Hour
Total Average Daily Trips ‐ 118 10 14 123 18 111 16
Entering/Exiting ‐ 59/59 6/4 6/8 61/62 9/9 55/56 7/9
Note: For the Fire and Rescure Station, only peak hour trip rates were provided by the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Therefore, as an industry standard, the peak hour trip rates were multiplied by 10 to identify an estimated average daily trip rate.

ITE Trip Rates
Fire and Rescue Station (Land Use Code: 575) Employees Weekdays Weekdays Public Park (Land Use Code:411) Acres
Saturday SundaySaturday Sunday
Recreation Community Center (Land Use Code:495) Employees Weekdays Saturday Sunday
Proposed Project Totals Weekdays Saturday Sunday
Appendix 2.1 Page 2.1-7
721
Appendix 2.2
CalEEMod Modeling Output
722
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 1 / 41
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.3. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-1
723
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 2 / 41

3.9. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated

3.11. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-2
724
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 3 / 41

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-3
725
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 4 / 41

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-4
726
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 5 / 41

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

8. User Changes to Default Data
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-5
727
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 6 / 41

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2
Construction Start Date 1/1/2024
Operational Year 2025
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.50
Precipitation (days) 9.20
Location 33.607774499327746, -117.24324112153622
County Riverside-South Coast
City Wildomar
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5536
EDFZ 11
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.14

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-6
728
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 7 / 41
City Park 8.23 Acre 0.00 0.00 350,000 0.00 — —
Government Office
Building

8.70 1000sqft 0.20 8,700 0.00 0.00 — —
Parking Lot 290 1000sqft 6.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
143 1000sqft 3.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.54 17.1 18.9 25.2 0.04 0.81 0.18 0.98 0.74 0.04 0.79 — 4,258 4,258 0.17 0.05 0.76 4,276 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.45 3.74 36.6 33.9 0.06 1.61 9.00 10.6 1.48 4.12 5.60 — 7,306 7,306 0.29 0.14 0.06 7,355 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.27 1.19 10.0 10.8 0.02 0.44 0.68 1.12 0.40 0.25 0.65 — 2,106 2,106 0.08 0.03 0.15 2,117 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.23 0.22 1.83 1.96 < 0.005 0.08 0.12 0.20 0.07 0.05 0.12 — 349 349 0.01 < 0.005 0.03 351 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-7
729
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 8 / 41

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 1.45 1.22 11.3 13.3 0.02 0.50 0.04 0.53 0.46 0.01 0.47 — 2,462 2,462 0.10 0.03 0.21 2,472 2025 2.54 17.1 18.9 25.2 0.04 0.81 0.18 0.98 0.74 0.04 0.79 — 4,258 4,258 0.17 0.05 0.76 4,276 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 4.45 3.74 36.6 33.9 0.06 1.61 9.00 10.6 1.48 4.12 5.60 — 7,306 7,306 0.29 0.14 0.06 7,355 2025 1.36 1.14 10.5 13.2 0.02 0.43 0.04 0.47 0.40 0.01 0.41 — 2,459 2,459 0.10 0.03 0.01 2,469 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 1.27 1.06 10.0 10.8 0.02 0.44 0.68 1.12 0.40 0.25 0.65 — 2,106 2,106 0.08 0.03 0.15 2,117 2025 0.44 1.19 3.38 4.31 0.01 0.14 0.02 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.13 — 781 781 0.03 0.01 0.04 785 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.23 0.19 1.83 1.96 < 0.005 0.08 0.12 0.20 0.07 0.05 0.12 — 349 349 0.01 < 0.005 0.03 351 2025 0.08 0.22 0.62 0.79 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 0.02 — 129 129 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 130

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.69 1.30 0.73 5.71 0.01 0.02 1.09 1.11 0.02 0.28 0.30 17.9 2,194 2,212 1.89 0.09 4.98 2,290 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-8
730
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 9 / 41
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.58 1.20 0.77 4.47 0.01 0.02 1.09 1.11 0.02 0.28 0.30 17.9 2,112 2,130 1.89 0.09 0.15 2,205 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.60 1.22 0.76 4.69 0.01 0.02 1.05 1.07 0.02 0.27 0.29 17.9 2,071 2,089 1.89 0.09 2.07 2,165 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.11 0.22 0.14 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 0.19 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 2.97 343 346 0.31 0.01 0.34 358

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.60 0.55 0.57 5.20 0.01 0.01 1.09 1.10 0.01 0.28 0.29 — 1,308 1,308 0.05 0.06 4.95 1,331 Area 0.07 0.74 < 0.005 0.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.56 1.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.56 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 791 791 0.02 < 0.005 — 792 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 13.2 92.7 106 1.35 0.03 — 149 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 4.74 0.00 4.74 0.47 0.00 — 16.6 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.69 1.30 0.73 5.71 0.01 0.02 1.09 1.11 0.02 0.28 0.30 17.9 2,194 2,212 1.89 0.09 4.98 2,290 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.57 0.51 0.61 4.33 0.01 0.01 1.09 1.10 0.01 0.28 0.29 — 1,229 1,229 0.05 0.06 0.13 1,247 Area — 0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-9
731
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 10 / 41
Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 791 791 0.02 < 0.005 — 792 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 13.2 92.7 106 1.35 0.03 — 149 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 4.74 0.00 4.74 0.47 0.00 — 16.6 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.58 1.20 0.77 4.47 0.01 0.02 1.09 1.11 0.02 0.28 0.30 17.9 2,112 2,130 1.89 0.09 0.15 2,205 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.54 0.49 0.59 4.30 0.01 0.01 1.05 1.05 0.01 0.27 0.27 — 1,187 1,187 0.05 0.06 2.05 1,207 Area 0.05 0.72 < 0.005 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.07 1.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.07 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 791 791 0.02 < 0.005 — 792 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 13.2 92.7 106 1.35 0.03 — 149 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 4.74 0.00 4.74 0.47 0.00 — 16.6 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.60 1.22 0.76 4.69 0.01 0.02 1.05 1.07 0.02 0.27 0.29 17.9 2,071 2,089 1.89 0.09 2.07 2,165 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.10 0.09 0.11 0.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 0.19 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 196 196 0.01 0.01 0.34 200 Area 0.01 0.13 < 0.005 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.18 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 131 131 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 131 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.18 15.4 17.5 0.22 0.01 — 24.7 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 0.79 0.00 0.79 0.08 0.00 — 2.75 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 Total 0.11 0.22 0.14 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 0.19 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 2.97 343 346 0.31 0.01 0.34 358

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-10
732
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 11 / 41
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

4.34 3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 1.60 — 1.60 1.47 — 1.47 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 7.67 7.67 — 3.94 3.94 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.05 1.05 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 — 11.6 11.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 12.1 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

0.12 0.10 0.99 0.90 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 145 145 0.01 < 0.005 — 146 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.21 0.21 — 0.11 0.11 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.32 0.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.33 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

0.02 0.02 0.18 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 24.0 24.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.1 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.04 0.04 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-11
733
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 12 / 41
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 161 161 0.01 0.01 0.02 163 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.58 0.19 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.03 0.04 — 460 460 0.01 0.07 0.03 481 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.46 4.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.53 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.6 12.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.2 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.74 0.74 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.75 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.09 2.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.18 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-12
734
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 13 / 41
Off-Road
Equipmen

4.19 3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 3.59 3.59 — 1.42 1.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.19 1.19 < 0.005 0.12 0.12 — 12.9 12.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.6 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

0.34 0.29 2.82 2.48 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 542 542 0.02 < 0.005 — 544 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.30 0.30 — 0.12 0.12 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 1.06 1.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.11 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

0.06 0.05 0.51 0.45 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 89.8 89.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 90.1 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.05 0.05 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.18 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 184 184 0.01 0.01 0.02 186 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-13
735
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 14 / 41
Vendor 0.02 0.02 0.64 0.21 < 0.005 0.01 0.14 0.15 0.01 0.04 0.05 — 511 511 0.01 0.08 0.04 535 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.3 15.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 15.5 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 42.0 42.0 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 44.0 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.53 2.53 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.57 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.95 6.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.28 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

1.44 1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

1.44 1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-14
736
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 15 / 41
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

0.78 0.66 6.13 7.16 0.01 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 1,309 1,309 0.05 0.01 — 1,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

0.14 0.12 1.12 1.31 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 217 217 0.01 < 0.005 — 217 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 27.8 27.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 28.3 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.4 36.4 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 38.2 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 25.6 25.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 25.9 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.5 36.5 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 38.1 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 14.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 14.4 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.9 19.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 20.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.34 2.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.38 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-15
737
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 16 / 41
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.29 3.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.45 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

1.35 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

1.35 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

0.37 0.31 2.90 3.62 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 666 666 0.03 0.01 — 669 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

0.07 0.06 0.53 0.66 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 110 110 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 111 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-16
738
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 17 / 41
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 27.2 27.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 27.7 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 35.9 35.9 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 37.6 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 25.1 25.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 25.4 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 35.9 35.9 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 37.6 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.05 7.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.16 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.98 9.98 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.4 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.17 1.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.18 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.65 1.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.73 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-17
739
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 18 / 41
Off-Road
Equipmen

0.95 0.80 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 — 0.35 0.32 — 0.32 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,517 Paving — 0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

0.05 0.04 0.41 0.55 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 82.8 82.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 83.1 Paving — 0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

0.01 0.01 0.07 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 13.7 13.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.8 Paving — 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 147 147 0.01 0.01 0.54 149 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-18
740
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 19 / 41
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.49 7.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.60 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.24 1.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.26 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen

0.15 0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 14.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.32 7.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.34 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-19
741
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 20 / 41
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipmen
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.21 1.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.22 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.45 5.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 5.53 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.28 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-20
742
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 21 / 41

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park 0.53 0.49 0.50 4.60 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.98 0.01 0.25 0.25 — 1,159 1,159 0.04 0.05 4.39 1,180 Governm
ent
Office
Building

0.07 0.06 0.06 0.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 0.13 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 — 149 149 0.01 0.01 0.56 152 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces

0.00 lt

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.60 0.55 0.57 5.20 0.01 0.01 1.09 1.10 0.01 0.28 0.29 — 1,308 1,308 0.05 0.06 4.95 1,331 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park 0.50 0.45 0.54 3.83 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.98 0.01 0.25 0.25 — 1,089 1,089 0.05 0.05 0.11 1,105 Governm
ent
Office
Building

0.06 0.06 0.07 0.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 0.13 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 — 140 140 0.01 0.01 0.01 142 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-21
743
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 22 / 41
Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces

0.00 lt

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.57 0.51 0.61 4.33 0.01 0.01 1.09 1.10 0.01 0.28 0.29 — 1,229 1,229 0.05 0.06 0.13 1,247 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park 0.09 0.08 0.10 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.17 0.17 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 — 173 173 0.01 0.01 0.30 176 Governm
ent
Office
Building

0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 23.4 23.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 23.8 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces

0.00 lt

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.10 0.09 0.11 0.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 0.19 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 196 196 0.01 0.01 0.34 200

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — 101 101 0.00 0.00 — 101 Governm
ent
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 185 185 0.00 0.00 — 185
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 309 309 0.00 0.00 — 309
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-22
744
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 23 / 41
Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces
—
lt
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 594 594 0.00 0.00 — 594
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — 101 101 0.00 0.00 — 101 Governm
ent
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 185 185 0.00 0.00 — 185
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 309 309 0.00 0.00 — 309
Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces
—
lt
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 594 594 0.00 0.00 — 594
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — 16.8 16.8 0.00 0.00 — 16.8 Governm
ent
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 30.6 30.6 0.00 0.00 — 30.6
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 51.1 51.1 0.00 0.00 — 51.1
Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces
—
lt
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 98.4 98.4 0.00 0.00 — 98.4

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-23
745
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 24 / 41
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 120 120 0.01 < 0.005 — 120 Governm
ent
Office
Building

0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 76.9 76.9 0.01 < 0.005 — 77.1 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces

0.00 lt

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 197 197 0.02 < 0.005 — 197 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 120 120 0.01 < 0.005 — 120 Governm
ent
Office
Building

0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 76.9 76.9 0.01 < 0.005 — 77.1 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces

0.00 lt

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 197 197 0.02 < 0.005 — 197 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 19.8 19.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.9 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-24
746
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 25 / 41
Governm
ent
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 12.7 12.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.8 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces

0.00 lt

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 32.6 32.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 32.7

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.07 0.06 < 0.005 0.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.56 1.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.56 Total 0.07 0.74 < 0.005 0.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.56 1.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.56 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-25
747
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 26 / 41
Consum
er
— 0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.18 Total 0.01 0.13 < 0.005 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.18

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 9.86 78.4 88.3 1.01 0.02 — 121 Governm
ent
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.31 14.3 17.6 0.34 0.01 — 28.5
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-26
748
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 27 / 41
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces
—
lt
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 13.2 92.7 106 1.35 0.03 — 149 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 9.86 78.4 88.3 1.01 0.02 — 121 Governm
ent
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.31 14.3 17.6 0.34 0.01 — 28.5
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces
—
lt
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 13.2 92.7 106 1.35 0.03 — 149 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 1.63 13.0 14.6 0.17 < 0.005 — 20.0 Governm
ent
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.55 2.37 2.92 0.06 < 0.005 — 4.72 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces
—
lt
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.18 15.4 17.5 0.22 0.01 — 24.7 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-27
749
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 28 / 41

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.38 0.00 0.38 0.04 0.00 — 1.33 Governm
ent
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 4.36 0.00 4.36 0.44 0.00 — 15.3
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces
—
lt
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 4.74 0.00 4.74 0.47 0.00 — 16.6 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.38 0.00 0.38 0.04 0.00 — 1.33 Governm
ent
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 4.36 0.00 4.36 0.44 0.00 — 15.3
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces
—
lt
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 4.74 0.00 4.74 0.47 0.00 — 16.6 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-28
750
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 29 / 41
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.00 — 0.22 Governm
ent
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.72 0.00 0.72 0.07 0.00 — 2.53
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Non-Asph
Surfaces
—
lt
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 0.79 0.00 0.79 0.08 0.00 — 2.75

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Governm
ent
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-29
751
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 30 / 41
Governm
ent
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00
Governm
ent
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-30
752
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 31 / 41

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-31
753
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 32 / 41
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-32
754
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 33 / 41
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-33
755
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 34 / 41
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/30/2024 2/13/2024 5.00 10.0 — Grading Grading 2/14/2024 3/27/2024 5.00 30.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 3/28/2024 5/22/2025 5.00 300 — Paving Paving 4/25/2025 5/22/2025 5.00 20.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/25/2025 5/22/2025 5.00 20.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-34
756
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 35 / 41
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 12.8 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor 18.0 8.33 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck 1.00 2.90 HHDT
Grading — — — —
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-35
757
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 36 / 41
Grading Worker 20.0 12.8 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor 20.0 8.33 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck 1.00 3.30 HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 2.78 12.8 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 1.43 8.33 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 12.8 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor 0.00 8.33 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 0.56 12.8 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor 0.00 8.33 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water unpaved roads twice daily 55% 55%
Limit vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 25 mph 44% 44% Sweep paved roads once per month 9% 9%
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-36
758
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 37 / 41

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 26,100 8,700 25,940

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic Yards) Material Exported (Cubic Yards) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 —
Grading 0.00 0.00 90.0 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.92

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 2 61% 61%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
City Park 0.00 0%
Government Office Building 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 6.65 100%
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 3.28 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-37
759
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 38 / 41
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2024 0.00 444 0.00 0.00
2025 0.00 444 0.00 0.00

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year City Park 104 109 96.9 37,837 1,303 1,366 1,216 474,381 Government Office
Building

14.0 14.0 14.0 5,113 176 176 176 64,099
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 26,100 8,700 25,940

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-38
760
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 39 / 41
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) City Park 83,251 444 0.0000 0.0000 373,668
Government Office Building 151,756 444 0.0000 0.0000 240,004 Parking Lot 253,628 444 0.0000 0.0000 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 444 0.0000 0.0000 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) City Park 5,145,444 5,549,499
Government Office Building 1,728,339 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
City Park 0.71 —
Government Office Building 8.09 —
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-39
761
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 40 / 41
Parking Lot 0.00 —
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced City Park Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
City Park Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Government Office
Building
Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
Government Office
Building
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-40
762
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) v2 Custom Report, 6/27/2023 41 / 41
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

Construction: Electricity SCE 2022 Sus Report
Operations: Energy Use City Park updated to match Racquet Club defaults Operations: Water and Waste Water City Park indoor water use updated to match Racquet Club default rate Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-41
763
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) On-site Mobile Sources Only Custom Report, 6/29/2023 1 / 7
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) On-site Mobile Sources Only Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

2. Emissions Summary

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-42
764
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) On-site Mobile Sources Only Custom Report, 6/29/2023 2 / 7

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) On-site Mobile Sources Only Operational Year 2025
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.50
Precipitation (days) 9.20
Location 33.607774499327746, -117.24324112153622
County Riverside-South Coast
City Wildomar
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5536
EDFZ 11
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.14

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
City Park 8.23 Acre 0.00 0.00 350,000 0.00 — —
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-43
765
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) On-site Mobile Sources Only Custom Report, 6/29/2023 3 / 7
Government Office
Building

8.70 1000sqft 0.20 8,700 0.00 0.00 — —
Parking Lot 290 1000sqft 6.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
143 1000sqft 3.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —

2. Emissions Summary

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.43 0.42 0.11 0.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 43.6 43.6 0.02 0.01 0.08 47.0 Area 0.07 0.74 < 0.005 0.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.56 1.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.56 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 668 668 0.04 < 0.005 — 670 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 3.31 60.1 63.4 0.34 0.01 — 74.5 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 4.74 0.00 4.74 0.47 0.00 — 16.6 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.50 1.17 0.18 1.21 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 8.05 773 781 0.88 0.02 0.10 810 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.39 0.38 0.12 0.88 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 42.6 42.6 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 46.1 Area — 0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 668 668 0.04 < 0.005 — 670 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 3.31 60.1 63.4 0.34 0.01 — 74.5 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 4.74 0.00 4.74 0.47 0.00 — 16.6 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-44
766
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) On-site Mobile Sources Only Custom Report, 6/29/2023 4 / 7
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.40 1.07 0.18 0.94 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 8.05 770 779 0.88 0.02 0.02 807 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.37 0.36 0.11 0.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 40.9 40.9 0.02 0.01 0.03 44.3 Area 0.05 0.72 < 0.005 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.07 1.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.07 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 668 668 0.04 < 0.005 — 670 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 3.31 60.1 63.4 0.34 0.01 — 74.5 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 4.74 0.00 4.74 0.47 0.00 — 16.6 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.43 1.09 0.18 1.16 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 8.05 770 778 0.88 0.02 0.05 807 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.78 6.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.33 Area 0.01 0.13 < 0.005 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.18 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 111 111 0.01 < 0.005 — 111 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.55 9.95 10.5 0.06 < 0.005 — 12.3 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 0.79 0.00 0.79 0.08 0.00 — 2.75 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 Total 0.08 0.20 0.03 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.33 127 129 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 134

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-45
767
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) On-site Mobile Sources Only Custom Report, 6/29/2023 5 / 7
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park 0.38 0.37 0.10 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 38.6 38.6 0.02 0.01 0.07 41.6 Governm
ent
Office
Building

0.05 0.05 0.01 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.97 4.97 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.35 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.43 0.42 0.11 0.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 43.6 43.6 0.02 0.01 0.08 47.0 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park 0.35 0.34 0.11 0.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.8 37.8 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 40.8 Governm
ent
Office
Building

0.04 0.04 0.01 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.85 4.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.25 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.39 0.38 0.12 0.88 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 42.6 42.6 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 46.1 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Park 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.97 5.97 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.46 Governm
ent
Office
Building

0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.81 0.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.87 Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-46
768
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) On-site Mobile Sources Only Custom Report, 6/29/2023 6 / 7
Parking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lot
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.78 6.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.33

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year City Park 104 109 96.9 37,837 20.8 21.8 19.4 7,567
Government Office
Building

14.0 14.0 14.0 5,113 2.80 2.80 2.80 1,023
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Updated to specify recreational building square footage Construction: Construction Phases Updated to account for overlapping construction schedule Construction: Architectural Coatings Corrections for parking area? Operations: Vehicle Data Updated to reflect ITE Manual Trip Rates, Onsite Mobile Emissions Only (0.2 mi on-site distance) Characteristics: Utility Information —
Construction: Electricity SCE 2022 Sus Report
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-47
769
Ronald Reagan Park (WILD-01.6) On-site Mobile Sources Only Custom Report, 6/29/2023 7 / 7
Operations: Energy Use —
Operations: Water and Waste Water —
Appendix 2.2 Page 2.2-48
770
Appendix 2.3
Emissions Calculations
Worksheet
771
Regional Construction Emissions Worksheet:

3.1. Site Preparation (2024) ‐ Unmitigated
VOC NOx CO SO₂ PM10 Total PM2.5Total
Onsite Winter
Off‐Road Equipment 3.65 36.00 32.90 0.05 1.60 1.47
Dust From Material Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.67 3.94 Onsite truck 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 1.05 0.11
Total 3.66 36.02 32.91 0.06 10.32 5.52
Offsite
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.82 0 0.16 0.04
Vendor 0.01 0.58 0.19 0.005 0.13 0.04
Hauling 0 0 0 000
Total 0.09 0.65 1.01 0.01 0.29 0.08
TOTAL 3.75 36.67 33.92 0.06 10.61 5.60
TOTAL 3.75 36.67 33.92 0.06 10.61 5.60

3.3. Grading (2024) ‐ Unmitigated
VOC NOx CO SO₂ PM10 Total PM2.5Total
Onsite Winter
Off‐Road Equipment 3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 1.33
Dust From Material Movement 0000 3.59 1.42
Onsite truck 0.005 0.03 0.01 0.005 1.19 0.12
Total 3.53 34.33 30.21 0.07 6.23 2.87
Offsite
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.93 0 0.18 0.04
Vendor 0.02 0.64 0.21 0.005 0.15 0.05
Hauling 0 0 0 000
Total 0.11 0.72 1.14 0.01 0.33 0.09
TOTAL 3.64 35.05 31.35 0.07 6.56 2.96
TOTAL 3.64 35.05 31.35 0.07 6.56 2.96
Appendix 2.3 Page 2.3-1
772

3.5. Building Construction (2024) ‐ Unmitigated
VOC NOx CO SO₂ PM10 Total PM2.5Total
Onsite Summer
Off‐Road Equipment 1.2 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.5 0.46
Onsite truck 0 0 0 000
Total 1.20 11.20 13.10 0.02 0.50 0.46
Offsite
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.17 0 0.03 0.01
Vendor 0.005 0.04 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.005
Hauling 0 0 0 000
Total 0.02 0.05 0.18 0.01 0.04 0.02
TOTAL 1.22 11.25 13.28 0.03 0.54 0.48
Onsite Winter
Off‐Road Equipment 1.2 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.5 0.46
Onsite truck 0 0 0 000
Total 1.20 11.20 13.10 0.02 0.50 0.46
Offsite
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.13 0 0.03 0.01
Vendor 0.005 0.05 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.005
Hauling 0 0 0 000
Total 0.02 0.06 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.02
TOTAL 1.22 11.26 13.24 0.03 0.54 0.48
Onsite MAX
Off‐Road Equipment 1.20 11.20 13.10 0.02 0.50 0.46
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1.20 11.20 13.10 0.02 0.50 0.46
Offsite
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.03 0.01
Vendor 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.02 0.06 0.18 0.01 0.04 0.02
TOTAL 1.22 11.26 13.28 0.03 0.54 0.48
Appendix 2.3 Page 2.3-2
773

3.7. Building Construction (2025) ‐ Unmitigated
VOC NOx CO SO₂ PM10 Total PM2.5Total
Onsite Summer
Off‐Road Equipment 1.13 10.4 13 0.02 0.43 0.4
Onsite truck 0 0 0 000
Total 1.13 10.40 13.00 0.02 0.43 0.40
Offsite
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.16 0 0.03 0.01
Vendor 0.005 0.04 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.005
Hauling 0 0 0 000
Total 0.02 0.05 0.17 0.01 0.04 0.02
TOTAL 1.15 10.45 13.17 0.03 0.47 0.42
Onsite Winter
Off‐Road Equipment 1.13 10.4 13 0.02 0.43 0.4
Onsite truck 0 0 0 000
Total 1.13 10.40 13.00 0.02 0.43 0.40
Offsite
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.12 0 0.03 0.01
Vendor 0.005 0.04 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.005
Hauling 0 0 0 000
Total 0.02 0.05 0.13 0.01 0.04 0.02
TOTAL 1.15 10.45 13.13 0.03 0.47 0.42
Onsite MAX
Off‐Road Equipment 1.13 10.40 13.00 0.02 0.43 0.40
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1.13 10.40 13.00 0.02 0.43 0.40
Offsite
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.03 0.01
Vendor 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.02 0.05 0.17 0.01 0.04 0.02
TOTAL 1.15 10.45 13.17 0.03 0.47 0.42
Appendix 2.3 Page 2.3-3
774
Building Construction (TOTAL)
VOC NOx CO SO₂ PM10 Total PM2.5Total
Onsite MAX
Off‐Road Equipment 2.33 21.60 26.10 0.04 0.93 0.86
Dust From Material Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 2.33 21.60 26.10 0.04 0.93 0.86
Offsite
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.33 0.00 0.06 0.02
Vendor 0.01 0.09 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.03 0.11 0.35 0.01 0.08 0.03
TOTAL 2.36 21.71 26.45 0.05 1.01 0.89

3.9. Paving (2025) ‐ Unmitigated
VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite Summer
Off‐Road Equipment 0.8 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 0.32
Paving 0.87 0 0 0 0 0
Total 1.67 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 0.32
Offsite
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.84 0 0.14 0.03
Vendor 0 0 0 00 0
Hauling 0 0 0 00 0
Total 0.06 0.05 0.84 0.00 0.14 0.03
TOTAL 1.73 7.50 10.82 0.01 0.49 0.35
TOTAL 1.73 7.50 10.82 0.01 0.49 0.35
Appendix 2.3 Page 2.3-4
775

3.11. Architectural Coating (2025) ‐ Unmitigated
VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite Summer
Off‐Road Equipment 0.13 0.88 1.14 0.005 0.03 0.03
Architectural Coatings 14.1 0 0 0 0 0
Onsite truck 0 0 0 000
Total 14.23 0.88 1.14 0.01 0.03 0.03
Offsite
Worker 0.005 0.005 0.03 0 0.01 0.005
Vendor 0 0 0 000
Hauling 0 0 0 000
Total 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01
TOTAL 14.24 0.89 1.17 0.01 0.04 0.04
TOTAL 14.24 0.89 1.17 0.01 0.05 0.04
Appendix 2.3 Page 2.3-5
776
Maximum Daily (Pounds; Onsite + Offsite) VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total

3.1. Site Preparation (2024) ‐ Unmitigated 3.75 36.67 33.92 0.06 10.61 5.60

3.3. Grading (2024) ‐ Unmitigated 3.64 35.05 31.35 0.07 6.56 2.963.5. Building Construction (2024) ‐ Unmitigated 1.22 11.26 13.28 0.03 0.54 0.48

3.7. Building Construction (2025) ‐ Unmitigated 1.15 10.45 13.17 0.03 0.47 0.42

3.9. Paving (2025) ‐ Unmitigated 1.73 7.50 10.82 0.01 0.49 0.353.11. Architectural Coating (2025) ‐ Unmitigated 14.24 0.89 1.17 0.01 0.05 0.04Overlapping Phases Total1 17.11 18.84 25.16 0.04 1.01 0.80 MAX DAILY 17 37 34 0 11 6
Regional Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No No
Notes:1. Building Construction, Paving and Architectural Coating are expected to overlap Maximum Daily (Pounds; Onsite Only) VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total

3.1. Site Preparation (2024) ‐ Unmitigated 3.66 36.02 32.91 0.06 10.32 5.523.3. Grading (2024) ‐ Unmitigated 3.53 34.33 30.21 0.07 6.23 2.873.5. Building Construction (2024) ‐ Unmitigated 1.20 11.20 13.10 0.02 0.50 0.46

3.7. Building Construction (2025) ‐ Unmitigated 1.13 10.40 13.00 0.02 0.43 0.40

3.9. Paving (2025) ‐ Unmitigated 1.67 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 0.323.11. Architectural Coating (2025) ‐ Unmitigated 14.23 0.88 1.14 0.01 0.03 0.03Overlapping Phases Total1 17.03 18.73 24.12 0.04 0.81 0.75 MAX ONSITE DAILY 17 36 33 0 10 6
Localized Significance Thresholds2 N/A 371 1,965 N/A 13 8 Exceeds LSTs? N/A No No N/A No No
Notes:1. Building Construction, Paving and Architectural Coating are expected to overlap

2. Localized significance thresholds above correspond with SRA 25 on a 5‐acre site at 25 meters.

Construction Summary
Appendix 2.3 Page 2.3-6
777
1 CalEEMod, Version 2022.1
Regional Operational Emissions (pounds/day)Summer
VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Mobile 0.55 0.57 5.20 0.01 1.10 0.29Area 0.74 0.01 0.38 0.01 0.01 0.01Energy 0.01 0.16 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.01Total 1.30 0.74 5.72 0.02 1.12 0.31Winter VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Mobile 0.51 0.61 4.33 0.01 1.10 0.29Area 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Energy 0.01 0.16 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.01Total 1.20 0.77 4.47 0.02 1.11 0.30Max Daily VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Mobile 0.55 0.61 5.20 0.01 1.10 0.29Area 0.74 0.01 0.38 0.01 0.01 0.01Energy 0.01 0.16 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.01Total 1.30 0.77 5.72 0.02 1.12 0.31 55 55 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No No
Operation Emissions Worksheet
Regional Thresholds (lb/day)
Appendix 2.3 Page 2.3-7
778
Localized Operational Emissions (pounds/day) On-site Only Max Daily
VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Mobile 0.42 0.12 0.88 0.01 0.02 0.01Area 0.74 0.01 0.38 0.01 0.01 0.01Energy 0.01 0.16 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.01Total 1.17 0.29 1.40 0.02 0.04 0.03 N/A 371 1,965 N/A 4 2
Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No NoLSTs (lb/day)
Appendix 2.3 Page 2.3-8
779
GHG Emissions Inventory
Proposed Project Buildout
Construction1Totals
MTCO2e%
Year 2024 351 73%Year 2025 130 27%
Total Construction 481 100%
Total 30‐Year Amortization2 16
Notes
1 CalEEMod, Version 2022.12
Operations1 MTCO2e/Year2
Operations %
Mobile 200.00 53%
Area 0.18 0%
Energy 131.00 35%
Water 24.70 7%
Solid Waste 2.75 1%
Refrigerants 0 0%
30‐Year Construction Amortization 16.03 4%
Total 375 100%
South Coast AQMD Bright‐Line Screening Threshold 3,000
Exceed Threshold? No
Notes
1 CalEEMod, Version 2022.12 MTCO2e=metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Total construction emissions are amortized over 30 years per SCAQMD methodology; SCAQMD. 2009, November 19. Greenhouse Gases (GHG) CEQA Significance Thresholds Working Group Meeting 14. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐ source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse‐gases‐(ghg)‐ceqa‐significance‐thresholds/year‐2008‐2009/ghg‐meeting‐14/ghg‐meeting‐14‐ main‐presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2.

Appendix 2.3 Page 2.3-9
780
Appendix 1
Project Development Plans
781
SD
SD
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W

W W W W W W

SS SS SS SS
SS SS

IPE WOOD DECKING
8 16
8 16
K.P.1

COMMUNITY
GREEN

EXISTING NATURAL

DRAINAGE WITH HABITAT

ENHANCEMENTS

WALKING LOOP
BIO

INFILTRATION

PARKING

RESTROOM
NATURE

PLAYGROUND

SPLASH PAD
SAND

VOLLEYBALL
COURTS

DEMONSTRATION
GARDEN

POTENTIAL FUTURE

FIRE STATION
SHARED

PARKING

BIKE PLAZA

BIKE PATHS

LA ESTRELLA STREET

COMMUNITY
CENTER

AMPHITHEATER

FITNESS PLAZA

PARKING

PARENT DROP-OFF
AREA

TRAIL-HEAD

HILL-TOP PLAY

SHADE STRUCTURE

HILL-TOP CLIMB

RAILROAD

TERRACES

BRIDGE CROSSING

RONALD REAGAN

ELEMENTARY CONNECTION

PARKING
TRAILS

BIO INFILTRATION

TURF AREA DROP-OFF MAINTENANCE

VEHICLE PARKING

PLANTER BOXES WITH

UTILITY HOOK-UPS FOR
VENDORS, TYP.

COMMUNITY

CENTER PATIO

INTERPRETIVE

SIGNAGE

INTERPRETIVE

SIGNAGE
8' WIDE

CONCRETE

PATHWAY

ROCK RETAINING
WALL

PARKING

LOOK OUT POINT WITH

TREES, LANDSCAPING,

SEATING AREA, AND

INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE

LOOK OUT POINT WITH

TREES, LANDSCAPING,

SEATING AREA, AND

INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE

LOOK OUT POINT WITH

TREES, LANDSCAPING,

SEATING AREA, AND

INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE

LOOK OUT POINT WITH

TREES, LANDSCAPING,

SEATING AREA, AND

INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE

BIO RETENTION BASIN

DG PATH

ACCESSIBLE RAMP

CONNECTING SCHOOL

CONCRETE STEPS
NATURAL TRAIL 4'
NATURAL TRAIL 4'

STEPS TO TRAIL

ADVENTURE PLAY

FLAG POLE WITH

SOLAR UP-LIGHT

ROCK RETAINING
WALL
W
W
8+92 9+0010+00
11+00 12+00
13+00
14+00
15+0016+00
17+00
18+00
19+00
20+00 21+0022+00 22+63
10+00
11+00 12+0013+0014+0015+0016+00
16+86
10+0011+0012+0013+0014+00
15+00
15+52
10+0011+00
12+00
13+00 14+00
15+00
16+00
17+00
18+00
19+00
20+00
21+00 22+00
23+00
24+00
25+00
25+63
10+00
11+00
12+00
12+78
Transition Area

IPE WOOD DECKING
8 16
8 16
K.P.1
X - 1
X - 2 X - 3

COMMUNITY GREEN

EXISTING NATURAL DRAINAGE WITH HABITAT ENHANCEMENTS

WALKING LOOP
BIO

INFILTRATION

PARKING

RESTROOM

NATURE PLAYGROUND

SPLASH PAD
SAND

VOLLEYBALL COURTS

DEMONSTRATION GARDEN

POTENTIAL FUTURE

FIRE STATION
SHARED

PARKING

BIKE PLAZA

BIKE PATHS

PEGGY LANE

LA ESTRELLA STREET

COMMUNITY CENTER

AMPHITHEATER

FITNESS PLAZA

PARKING

PARENT DROP-OFF AREA

TRAIL-HEAD

HILL-TOP PLAY

SHADE STRUCTURE

HILL-TOP CLIMB

RAILROAD

TERRACES

BRIDGE CROSSING

RONALD REAGAN

ELEMENTARY CONNECTION

PARKING
TRAILS

BIO INFILTRATION

TURF AREA DROP-OFF MAINTENANCE VEHICLE PARKING

PLANTER BOXES WITH
UTILITY HOOK-UPS FOR VENDORS, TYP.

COMMUNITY CENTER PATIO

INTERPRETIVE

SIGNAGE

INTERPRETIVE

SIGNAGE
8' WIDE CONCRETE PATHWAY

ROCK RETAINING WALL

PARKING

LOOK OUT POINT WITH

TREES, LANDSCAPING, SEATING AREA, AND

INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE

LOOK OUT POINT WITH

TREES, LANDSCAPING, SEATING AREA, AND

INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE

LOOK OUT POINT WITH

TREES, LANDSCAPING, SEATING AREA, AND

INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE

LOOK OUT POINT WITH

TREES, LANDSCAPING, SEATING AREA, AND

INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE

BIO RETENTION BASIN

DG PATH

ACCESSIBLE RAMP CONNECTING SCHOOL

CONCRETE STEPS
NATURAL TRAIL 4'
NATURAL TRAIL 4'

STEPS TO TRAIL

ADVENTURE PLAY

FLAG POLE WITH

SOLAR UP-LIGHT

ROCK RETAINING WALL
N:\1000\1064-01-RC17-27-Acre-Park\Planning\F.04 Design Development\CAD\Overall Site Plan-1064-01.dwg, L-1, May 09, 2023 12:02pm, rguraydin

PROJECT MANAGER

DRAWN BY

PROJECT NUMBER

CHECKED BY
SHEET
MAY 28, 2021
1064-01-RC17
DATE
75% SUBMITTAL
rrmdesign.com | (805) 543-1794
3765 S. Higuera, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401

THE INCLUDED DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, IDEAS, DESIGNS AND ARRANGEMENT

REPRESENTED THEREBY ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF RRM DESIG

GROUP AND NO PART THEREOF SHALL BE COPIED, DISCLOSED TO OTHERS O

USED IN CONNECTION WITH ANY WORK OR PROJECT OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIE

PROJECT FOR WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN PREPARED AND DEVELOPED WITHOUT TH WRITTEN CONSENT OF RRM DESIGN GROUP. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THESE DRAWING

OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONSTITUTE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF THES RESTRICTIONS. SUBMITTAL OF THESE DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC AGENCY REVIEW

RRM IS A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
NO. REVISION DATE 27 ACRE PARK WILDOMAR, CA

PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
LP-1

OVERALL SITE PLAN
EK RG

AMANDA SEIBEL
C-2 C-3
C-1
0 120 feet
1"=60'
60 180

RONALD REAGAN ELEMENTARY
APN: 376350019 & 376350020

SUSAN DR

WILDOMAR TRAILS ROAD

PEGGY LANE
APN: 376350017
APN: 376350009
782
View 3

WILDOMAR MASTER PLAN
27 ACRE PARK LAND VISIONING
APRIL 19, 2019
1) Bike Trails & Courses
2) Fire Station
9) Community Building
3) Splash Pad
0’ 30’ 60’ 120’ 180’
SCALE 1” = 60’

RONALD REAGAN ELEMENTARY

PORRAS ROAD
community
green
4) Volleyball Courts
5) Adventure/Nature Play
6) Demonstration Garden 7) Community Green 8) Picnic Pavilion 15) Hill-top Play
14) Trails
13) Shade Structure/Sails
12) Educational Signage
11) Fitness Plaza/Stations
10) Amphitheater

LA ESTRELLA STREET

PEGGY LANE
parking
shared
parking
look-out
restroom
existing natural
drainage with habitat
enhancements
gathering /
educational
space
parking
walking loop
parking
parent drop-off
area
trail-head parking
& parent drop-off
area
View 1
View 2
783

WILDOMAR
27 ACRE PARK LAND VISIONING APRIL 19, 2019
VIEW 1
784

WILDOMAR
27 ACRE PARK LAND VISIONING APRIL 19, 2019
VIEW 2
785

WILDOMAR
27 ACRE PARK LAND VISIONING APRIL 19, 2019
VIEW 3
786
787
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR TRACT BOUNDARY FENCE LINE (FNL) SAWCUT LINE EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR CENTER LINE LOT LINE EASEMENT LINE STORM DRAIN HEADWALL RETAINING WALL PER PLAN CONCRETE PER PLAN FIRE HYDRANT (FH) PER CITY STD EX. SANITARY SEWER EX. STORM DRAIN X X X FENCE LINE SLOPE DIRECTION AND GRADE INSTALL CENTERLINE MONUMENT WATER MAIN (W) INSTALL WATER VALVE GAS LINE BARRICADE EX. POWER POLE EX. OVERHEAD POWER LINE EX. BRUSH PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO SLOPE HINGE POINTS IN ORDER TO PROVIDE GRADED PAD AREA ADJACENT TO PATHS WALKWAYS, AND ROADS FOR LOT UTILITY BOXES, TRANSFORMERS, AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE. BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY PER CITY STD DRAIN INLET PER PLAN SDMH PER CITY STD SSMH PER CITY STD SEWER BACKWATER VALVE DRY UTILITIES (PHONE, POWER, CABLE) INSTALL STREET LIGHT PER CITY STD 1. NO CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STARTED WITHOUT PLANS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. THE CITY ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST TWENTY-FOUR HOURS PRIOR TO STARTING OF CONSTRUCTION. ANY CONSTRUCTION DONE WITHOUT APPROVED PLANS OR PRIOR NOTIFICATION TO THE CITY ENGINEER WILL BE REJECTED AND WILL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S AND/OR OWNER'S RISK. 2. A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING SHALL BE COORDINATED BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER OR CONTRACTOR AND SHALL INCLUDE PERTINENT CITY STAFF. AS A MINIMUM, THE ASSIGNED BUILDING INSPECTOR, PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR, NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGER, AND CONTRACT PLANNER SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THIS MEETING TO DISCUSS THE LIMIT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE CORRESPONDING INSPECTION RESPONSIBILITIES. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST CURRENT (AUGUST 2020) CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND ALL WORK SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 4. ALL GRADING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOILS ENGINEERING REPORT PREPARED BY: NINYO & MOORE GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, DATED MARCH 26, 2021; CONTACT PERSON: DANIEL B. CHU, PE. 5. RECORD PLANS ARE TO BE PREPARED AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CIVIL ENGINEER CERTIFYING THE IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARING THE RECORD PLANS SHALL BE PRESENT WHEN THE FINAL INSPECTION IS MADE. 6. AN INSPECTION AGREEMENT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 7. FOR ANY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY, IF ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS FROM THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THE CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD/STATE, OR THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME ARE REQUIRED, THE DEVELOPER SHALL EITHER SUBMIT A COPY OF ALL SUCH COMPLETED PERMITS TO THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OR DOCUMENT THAT THE REGULATORY AGENCIES DETERMINED THAT SAID PERMIT IS NOT REQUIRED; PRIOR TO TO ACCEPTANCE OF THE COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS FOR CITY MAINTENANCE AND RELEASE OF IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. ANY MITIGATION MONITORING REQUIRED BY SAID PERMIT WILL REMAIN THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER. 8. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE FROM RECORD SOURCES AND WERE SHOWN FOR DESIGN PURPOSES ONLY. 9. ALL UTILITY COMPANIES MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION BY THE CONTRACTOR. 10. CONTRACTOR TO TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (USA) TOLL FREE AT 811 A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT WORKING HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. FOR BEST RESPONSE, PROVIDE AS MUCH NOTICE AS POSSIBLE, UP TO TEN WORKING DAYS. 11. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR LOCATING OR HAVING LOCATED ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND RELATED FACILITIES AND FOR PROTECTING SAME DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL UTILITIES THAT ARE NOT A MEMBER OF USA MUST ALSO BE NOTED. 12. A CITY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK DONE WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. WORK REQUIRING AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO DEMOLITIONS, UTILITIES, WATER, SEWER, AND FIRE SERVICE LATERALS, CURB, GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY APPROACHES, SIDEWALK UNDERDRAINS, STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS, STREET TREE PLANTING OR PRUNING, CURB RAMPS, STREET PAVING, AND PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION OR CONSTRUCTION STAGING IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. ALL WORK LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY UTILITIES AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE ENGINEERING STANDARDS AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. THE CURRENT ADOPTED STANDARDS ARE DATED AUGUST 2020. 13. CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTION HOTLINE AT 781-7554 WITH AT LEAST A 48 HOUR NOTICE FOR ANY REQUIRED ENCROACHMENT PERMIT INSPECTIONS OR FINAL INSPECTIONS. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LEGIBLE AND COMPLETE SET OF PLANS IDENTIFYING ALL MODIFICATIONS MADE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER FOR THE RECORD DRAWINGS. 15. ANY PROPOSED DEVIATIONS FROM THE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL, INCLUDING FIELD REVISIONS REQUESTED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR. 16. THE DESIGN OF THE SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS IS BASED ON THE CITY'S RECORD INFORMATION (SURVEYS AND DRAWINGS). IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IS AWARDED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE RELATIVE ELEVATIONS AS SPECIFIED ON THESE PLANS AND NOTIFY THE DESIGN ENGINEER. THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ELEVATIONS WILL THEN BE MODIFIED ACCORDINGLY, AND A REVISED SET FURNISHED TO THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY REQUIRED REWORK IF CONSTRUCTION BEGINS WITHOUT VERIFYING THE SPECIFIED ELEVATIONS AND NOTIFYING THE DESIGN ENGINEER. 17. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OR PROPER RESETTING OF ALL EXISTING MONUMENTS AND OTHER SURVEY MARKERS. ANY SURVEY MONUMENTS DESTROYED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE LAND SURVEYORS ACT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 18. ALL PROPERTY CORNER MONUMENTS SHALL BE IN PLACE AND IDENTIFIED AT THE TIME OF THE FOUNDATION INSPECTION REQUEST. 19. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT AND OBTAIN APPROVAL OF A PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION PLAN IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. 20. CONTRACTOR TO SHALL PREVENT SOIL FROM WASHING ONTO THE SIDEWALK BY EITHER INSTALLING A HEADER BOARD, WALL, BERM, OR PROVIDING A TWO FOOT WIDE LEVEL AREA. 21. A COMPACTION REPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY A SOILS ENGINEER STATING THAT THE BASE AND SUBGRADE WERE PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SOILS REPORT OR THE CITY PARKING AND DRIVEWAY STANDARDS. 95% MINIMUM COMPACTION. 22. IF DE-WATERING IS REQUIRED, A LOW THREAT DISCHARGE PERMIT FROM CITY ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MAY BE REQUIRED. 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO ENCROACHMENT PERMIT ISSUANCE. 24. THE CITY INSPECTOR ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MAY REQUIRE REVISIONS IN THE PLANS TO SOLVE UNFORSEEN PROBLEMS THAT MAY ARISE IN THE FIELD. REVISIONS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPER'S ENGINEER. 25. HYDROSEEDING SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL DISTURBED SURFACES OTHER THAN PAVED OR GRAVEL SURFACES, PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION. SEED MIX SHALL BE SPECIFIED BY CITY BIOLOGIST. 26. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE ON SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TO BE IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO A PREDICTED RAIN EVENT OF 50% PROBABILITY OR GREATER 27. ANY SECTIONS OF DAMAGED OR DISPLACED CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK OR DRIVEWAY APPROACH SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 28. ALL STORM WATER EROSION CONTROL AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES / MEASURES (I.E. BMPS) SHALL BE IN PLACE THROUGHOUT THE YEAR DURING GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. 29. DIGITAL DRAWINGS OF HORIZONTAL CONTROL PROVIDED TO SURVEY FOR PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION 30. THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION APPROVALS AND/OR OCCUPANCY OF ANY BUILDING. 31. “RECORD” DRAWINGS OR “AS-BUILT” PLANS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF- WAY OR WITHIN CITY EASEMENTS AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT PER CITY STANDARDS AND CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. THE RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL BE RECEIVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION APPROVALS AND/OR OCCUPANCY OF ANY BUILDING. 32. STORMWATER AND DRAINAGE SYSTEM CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION APPROVALS. THE ENGINEER SHALL CERTIFY THAT THE DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER SYSTEM COMPONENTS HAVE BEEN INSPECTED AND ARE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE DRAINAGE REPORT, SYSTEM DESIGN, AND THE APPROVED PLANS, INCLUDING ALL FINAL ELEVATIONS, COMPONENT SIZING, DETENTION BASINS, PARKING LOT DETENTION CURB ELEVATIONS, DRAINAGE PIPING, INLETS, WEIR ELEVATIONS, AND ORIFICES. 1. ALL GRADING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY OF WILDOMAR GRADING ORDINANCES, THE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING THERETO, THIS PLAN, AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUPERVISING SOILS ENGINEER. 2. ALL EXPORT MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AND SPREAD WITHIN THE OVERALL LIMITS OF THE 27 ACRE WILDOMAR PARK DEVELOPMENT. 3. DUST CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY GRADING ORDINANCE AND COUNTY APCD REQUIREMENTS. 4. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROTECTION OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE JOB SITE AND THAT HE/SHE SHALL AT HIS/HER EXPENSE, REPAIR OR REPLACE TO ORIGINAL CONDITION ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE JOB SITE WHICH ARE DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL AND WHICH ARE DAMAGED OR REMOVED AS A RESULT OF HIS/HER OPERATIONS. 5. NO CUT OR FILL SLOPES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED STEEPER THAN TWO HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL (2:1). UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 6. MINIMUM DRAINAGE GRADIENT OF 5% IS REQUIRED FOR A MINIMUM OF10' AWAY FROM THE BUILDING PAD/FOUNDATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BUILDING CODES FOR LANDSCAPED AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS (SEE CBC SECTION 1804.3) 7. ALL SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS DESIGNED AT LESS THAN 2% SHALL HAVE FINAL GRADIENTS CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION. 8. SOILS TESTS SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 6-3.01 AND 6-3.03. ALL TESTS MUST BE MADE WITHIN 15 DAYS PRIOR TO PLACING THE MATERIAL. THE TEST RESULTS SHALL CLEARLY INDICATE THE LOCATION AND SOURCE OF THE MATERIAL. 9. COMPACTION TESTS SHALL BE MADE ON SUBGRADE MATERIAL AND MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. SAID TESTS SHALL BE MADE PRIOR TO THE PLACING OF THE NEXT MATERIAL.GRADING AND COMPACTIONS REQUIREMENTS SHOULD BE AS PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER REPORT AND/OR COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARDS. 10. SUBGRADE MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A RELATIVE COMPACTION OF 95% INTHE ZONE BETWEEN FINISHED SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND ONE FOOT BELOW. ALL MATERIAL IN FILL SECTIONS BELOW THE ZONE MENTIONED ABOVE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION. 11. FINAL REPORTS SHALL BE REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 18 OF THE CBC 12. DURING CONSTRUCTION/GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, THE APPLICANT SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING PARTICULATE (DUST) CONTROL MEASURES, THESE MEASURES SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE GRADING AND BUILDING PLANS. IN ADDITION, THE CONTRACTOR OR BUILDER SHALL DESIGNATE A PERSON OR PERSONS TO MONITOR THE DUST CONTROL PROGRAM AND TO ORDER INCREASED WATERING AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT TRANSPORT OF DUST OFF SITE. THEIR DUTIES SHALL INCLUDE HOLIDAY AND WEEKEND PERIODS WHEN WORK MAY NOT BE IN PROGRESS. THE NAME AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF SUCH PERSONS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE APCD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. A. USE OF WATER TRUCKS OR SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN SUFFICIENT QUANTITIES TO PREVENT AIRBORNE DUST FROM LEAVING THE SITE. INCREASED WATERING FREQUENCY WOULD BE REQUIRED WHENEVER WIND SPEEDS EXCEED 15 MPH. RECLAIMED (NON POTABLE) WATER SHALL BE USED WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 13. CONSISTENT WITH THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES, A QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST SITE MONITOR SHALL BE PRESENT DURING SITE DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. IF EXCAVATIONS ENCOUNTER SIGNIFICANT PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES, ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES OR CULTURAL MATERIALS, THEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WHICH MAY AFFECT THEM SHALL CEASE UNTIL THE EXTENT OF THE RESOURCE IS DETERMINED AND APPROPRIATE PROTECTIVE MEASURES ARE APPROVED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF THE EXTENT AND LOCATION OF DISCOVERED MATERIALS SO THAT THEY MAY BE RECORDED BY A QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST. IF PRE-HISTORIC NATIVE AMERICAN ARTIFACTS ARE ENCOUNTERED, A NATIVE AMERICAN MONITOR SHOULD BE CALLED IN TO WORK WITH THE ARCHAEOLOGIST TO DOCUMENT AND REMOVE THE ITEMS. DISPOSITIONS OF ARTIFACTS SHALL COMPLY WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS. ARCHAEOLOGICAL OBSERVATION TO BE PROVIDED BY: APPLIED EARTHWORKS, ERIN ENRIGHT (805) 594-1590 . 14. ALL DISTURBED SURFACES SLOPED FOUR HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL (4:1) AND GREATER AND AREAS USED TO CONVEY CONCENTRATED DRAINAGE SHALL BE PREPARED AND MAINTAINED TO CONTROL EROSION BY EFFECTIVE PLANTING TO BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 30 DAYS PRIOR TO A REQUEST FOR FINAL INSPECTION APPROVALS. 15. ALL ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION FOR THE SUBDIVISION MAP SHALL COMPLY AT ALL TIMES WITH ALL CURRENT APCD RULES AND REGULATIONS AS APPLICABLE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PM-10, NOx EMISSIONS, BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT PLANS, AND PHASING TECHNIQUES. 16. RECYCLED WATER IS AVAILABLE FOR USE FOR DUST SUPPRESSION AND OTHER GRADING ACTIVITIES THROUGH A CONSTRUCTION WATER PERMIT. PLEASE CONTACT THE WATER RESOURCES PROGRAM MANAGER FOR INFORMATION ON THIS PERMIT (805-781-7217). A TEMPORARY METER CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FOR GRADING OPERATIONS USING METERED WATER FROM THE RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM. 17. A FIRE DEPARTMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED IF FUEL IS STORED ON-SITE. 18. TRACKING ONTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE MINIMIZED. THE ADJOINING STREET AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CLEANED BY SWEEPING TO REMOVE DIRT, DUST, MUD, AND CONSTRUCTION. DEBRIS AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. 1. THIS DEMOLITION PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ARCHITECT AND THE ENGINEER DO NOT REPRESENT THAT ALL ITEMS WHICH MAY REQUIRE DEMOLITION HAVE BEEN SHOWN. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CAREFULLY EXAMINE THE SITE AND DETERMINE WHAT MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION AND COMPLETION OF THE WORK. 2. DEMOLITION WORK AND ABANDONMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST VERSION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, TITLE 24, AND ALL WORK SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. 3. NO DEMOLITION SHALL BE STARTED WITHOUT APPROVED PLANS. THE OWNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO STARTING DEMOLITION. 4. THE PLANS DO NOT AUTHORIZE SITE DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE LIMITS AS REPRESENTED ON THESE PLANS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE ALL ITEMS DAMAGED DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER STORAGE OF ANY ITEMS TO BE RELOCATED. 7. ALL ITEMS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ANY ITEMS AT THE REQUEST OF THE OWNER. 8. ALL DEBRIS FROM THE DEMOLITION PROCESS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE TO AN APPROVED DUMP AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR ACTIVITY WHICH WOULD DISTURB THAT MATERIAL BY A LICENSED ABATEMENT CONTRACTOR. 10. IF ASBESTOS IS FOUND IN THE EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE DEMOLISHED, THEN ASBESTOS MUST BE REMOVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND FEDERAL GUIDELINES OR REQUIREMENTS. REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPLETED BY A CONTRACTOR LICENSED TO HANDLE ASBESTOS MATERIAL. 11. ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, VEHICULAR WAYS, SIDEWALKS, AND HAUL ROUTES SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AND CLEAR OF DEBRIS, DIRT AND DUST IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY. AT A MINIMUM, THESE AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN A "STOP WORK" NOTICE. SAID NOTICE WILL NOT BE RELEASED UNTIL THE AREA HAS BEEN ADEQUATELY CLEANED. THE FLUSHING OF DIRT OR DEBRIS INTO STORM DRAIN OR SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. 12. ALL ABANDONED UTILITIES SHALL BE MARKED IN THE FIELD AND LOCATED ON THE DRAWINGS OF RECORD BY THE CONTRACTOR WHICH WILL BE SUPPLIED TO BOTH THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND THE OWNER AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE DEMOLITION WORK. 13. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE FROM RECORD SOURCES AND SPOT CHECKS. UTILITIES ARE SHOWN FOR DESIGN PURPOSES ONLY. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ONLY REMOVE THOSE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SPECIFICALLY NOTED FOR REMOVAL. DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES TO REMAIN SHALL BE CORRECTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 15. THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 16. CONTRACTOR TO TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (USA) TOLL FREE AT 811 A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. FOR BEST RESPONSE, PROVIDE AS MUCH NOTICE AS POSSIBLE, UP TO 10 WORKING DAYS. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT INTERRUPT ANY SERVICES OR DISRUPT THE OPERATION OF ADJACENT BUSINESSES, RESIDENTIAL AREAS OR ONSITE FACILITIES OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF DEMOLITION. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A DEMOLITION PERMIT FOR WORK WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY FROM THE CITY PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR WORK WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY FROM THE CITY PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK. 20. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL WOOD, CONCRETE, A.C. PAVING, AGGREGATE BASE, AND VEGETATION AS SHOWN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. 21. REMOVE TREES, TOGETHER WITH THE BULK OF THE ROOTS, TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4 FEET BELOW EXISTING GRADE AND WITHIN A RADIUS OF 7 FEET BEYOND THE PERIMETER OF THE TRUNK AT GROUND LINE. 22. FILL AND COMPACT HOLES RESULTING FROM TREES AND TREE STUMP REMOVAL TO REQUIRED DENSITY. FILLING SHALL NOT BE DONE UNTIL HOLES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 23. DUST CONTROL SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR. 24. CONTRACTOR TO DISPOSE OF ALL MATERIALS PER CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION RECYCLING PLAN FOR THIS PROJECT. 25. PROTECT EXISTING FACILITIES OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF DEMOLITION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 26. TREE REMOVALS MAY REQUIRE APPROVAL BY THE CITY ARBORIST. CONTACT THE CITY ARBORIST AT 781-7023 TO REVIEW ANY PROPOSAL FOR TREE REMOVALS AND TO INITIATE AN APPLICATION FOR A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT IF APPLICABLE. 27. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DURING ALL DEMOLITIONS, CONSTRUCTION AND GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. UTILITY NOTES GENERAL NOTES GRADING NOTES DEMOLITION NOTES 1. UTILITIES SHOWN ARE ACCURATE TO THE EXTENT OF AVAILABLE RECORDS AND KNOWLEDGE. THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND TO NOTIFY UTILITY COMPANIES WHEN WORKING IN THEIR PROXIMITY. PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITY POINTS OF CONNECTION AND ELEVATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN THE PLANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS PERTAINING TO MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, LOCATIONS, ETC., PRIOR TO CONTINUING WORK. 2. THE ENGINEERED DRY UTILITY PLANS WILL BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEM. THE ENGINEERED DRY UTILITY PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY ON-SITE OF OFF-SITE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL WATER VALVES THAT ARE DEEPER THAN 4' SHALL BE A EQUIPPED WITH A STEEL VALVE STEM EXTENSION THAT WILL ALLOW VALVE OPERATION WITH STANDARD LENGTH VALVE KEY. VALVE OPERATING NUTS SHALL BE BETWEEN 2' TO 4' BELOW GRADE. THE STEEL VALVE STEM EXTENSION SHALL BE STEEL ONLY BY PIPE LINE PRODUCTS OR APPROVED EQUAL 4. THE DRY UTILITY SERVICE LINES AND BOXES SHOWN IN THESE PLANS ARE SCHEMATIC AND BASED ON PROVIDED PLANS FROM THE UTILITY PROVIDER. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN THE FINAL PLANS FROM THE UTILITY PROVIDER AND VERIFY THE FINAL ALIGNMENT PER THEIR APPROVED PLANS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ROUTING THE SERVICE WIRE THROUGH THE CONDUIT RUNS TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THE SHOWN EQUIPMENT. INSTALL GATE VALVE WITH THRUST BLOCK; VALVES SHOWN ON NORTH AND WEST LEGS — SEE PLAN VIEW FOR ACTUAL LOCATIONS LEGENDRECYCLED WATER MAIN APPROXIMATE EARTH QUANTITIES PRELIMINARY GRADING CUT: 31,000 CY cu yd PRELIMINARY GRADING FILL: 31,000 CY cu yd PRELIMINARY GRADING NET: 0 AREA OF DISTURBANCE: 525,445 SF THE RAW EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SHOWN HEREON REPRESENT THE ESTIMATED VOLUMETRIC DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PROPOSED ROUGH GRADE AND THE LIMITED TOPOGRAPHIC EXISTING GRADES. THESE ESTIMATES DO NOT MAKE CONSIDERATIONS FOR LOSSES OR BULKING DUE TO: SHRINKAGE, SOIL AMENDMENTS, STABILIZATION, CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE, FOOTING & TRENCHING SPOILS, ETC. THESE, IN ADDITION TO ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND THE FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER, MAY SIGNIFICANTLY EFFECT THE FINAL IMPORT/EXPORT QUANTITIES. INSTALL PROPOSED SIGN STORM DRAIN LINE SEWER LINE SEWER FORCE MAIN LINE TRUNCATED DOMES PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A88A SD CATCH BASIN PER CITY STD ABBREVIATIONS AC ASPHALT AP ANGLE POINT BCR BEGIN CURVE BW BACK OF WALK CB CATCH BASIN CL CENTERLINE CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CONC CONCRETE DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE EX EXISTING EL ELEVATION FF FINISHED FLOOR FG FINISHED GRADE FL FLOWLINE FS FINISHED SURFACE FP FINISHED PAD GFF GARAGE FINISHED FLOOR IPS IRON PIPE SIZE JT JOINT TRENTH PL PROPERTY LINE PCL PARCEL PCC PORLAND CEMENT CONCRETE POC POINT ON CURVE PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVE ROW RIGHT OF WAY RW RECYCLED WATER SFM SEWER FORCE MAIN SL STREET LIGHT SERVICE LATERAL SS SANITARY SEWER TBM TEMPORARY BENCHMARK TC TOP OF CURB TF TOP OF FOOTING TG TOP OF GRATE TYP TYPICAL TW TOP OF WALL UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE WSE WATER SURFACE ELEVATION FS LAT FIRE SERVICE LATERAL W WATER SDDI STORM DRAIN DRAIN INLET FLCP FIBER LINED CONCRETE PIPE INSTALL WATER LATERAL , METER, AND SERVICE X X315 315 SDWSDSS SSOH SFMGRW INSTALL 17" x 30" TRAFFIC RATED PULL BOX BASIN AREA EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE 2:1 NOTE: MARK BY DATE ENGINEER REVISIONS CITY APPR. DATE SEAL-ENGINEER: R.C.E. No. BENCHMARK: SCALE: H: V: SHEET No. The private engineer signing these plans is responsible for assuring the accuracy and acceptability of the design hereon. In the event of discrepancies arising after City acceptance or during construction, the private engineer shall be responsible for determining an acceptable solution and revising the plans for acceptance by the City. WORK CONTAINED WITHIN THESE PLANS SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. EXP. San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 32332 Camino Capistrano #205, RRM DESIGN GROUP (949) 361-7950 # CITY OF WILDOMAR 27 ACRE PARK Elevation = ________ Datum = _________ BENCHMARK # _____________ THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED ON (date) BY (surveyor) L.S. (number), EXP. (date) As Noted As Noted CITY OF WILDOMAR Daniel A. York, Director of Public Works/ Date: ACCEPTANCE AS TO CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY STANDARDS AND PRACTICES ACCEPTED BY:City Engineer, PE 43212 PREPARED BY: N:\1000\1064-01-RC17-27-Acre-Park\Engineering\ConDocs\Sheet-Files\C-1.x Title and General Notes.dwg, C102, Jun 02, 2022 3:05pm, ngwalters G002 GENERAL NOTES 788
789
790

W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W SS SS SS SS SS EXISTING MANHOLE (TYP) EXISTING WATER METER PROTECT EXISTING FENCING EXISTING TREES EXISTING SIGNAGE EXISTING PARCEL LINE EXISTING PARCEL LINE EXISTING WATER SERVICE LINE EXISTING SIGNAGE (TYP) EXISTING PARCEL LINE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PROTECT EXISTING TREES PROTECT EXISTING TREESDENSE VEGETATION AREAS SUSANDR RONALD REAGAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL APN 376-350-009 APN 376-350-017 EXISTING TRAIL EXISTING TRAIL EXISTING DIRT ROAD EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING 27'' STORM DRAIN EXISTING 8'' PVC C900 WATER LINE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING 12'' PVC C900 WATER LINE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING 4'' PVC C900 INTERIM FM SEWER LINE PEGGY LN LA ESTRELLA ST PORRAS DR EXISTING 72'' STORM DRAIN EXISTING 8'' PVC SEWER LINE EXISTING 18'' STORM DRAIN EXISTING 12'' WATER LINE EXISTING 36'' STORM DRAIN EXISTING STREET LIGHT (TYP) EXISTING VALVE EXISTING VALVE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT NOTE: MARK BY DATE ENGINEER REVISIONS CITY APPR. DATE SEAL-ENGINEER: R.C.E. No. BENCHMARK: SCALE: H: V: SHEET No. The private engineer signing these plans is responsible for assuring the accuracy and acceptability of the design hereon. In the event of discrepancies arising after City acceptance or during construction, the private engineer shall be responsible for determining an acceptable solution and revising the plans for acceptance by the City. WORK CONTAINED WITHIN THESE PLANS SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. EXP. San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 32332 Camino Capistrano #205, RRM DESIGN GROUP (949) 361-7950 # CITY OF WILDOMAR 27 ACRE PARK Elevation = ________ Datum = _________ BENCHMARK # _____________ THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED ON (date) BY (surveyor) L.S. (number), EXP. (date) As Noted As Noted CITY OF WILDOMAR Daniel A. York, Director of Public Works/ Date: ACCEPTANCE AS TO CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY STANDARDS AND PRACTICES ACCEPTED BY:City Engineer, PE 43212 PREPARED BY: N:\1000\1064-01-RC17-27-Acre-Park\Engineering\ConDocs\Sheet-Files\C-2.1 Existing Conditions.dwg, CE101, Jun 02, 2022 3:05pm, ngwalters 0 150 feet SCALE: 1"=75' 75 225 CE101 EXISTING CONDITIONS 791

L L L L L L SS SS S S S S S S SS S S S SS SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSS S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S SS S SS S S S S S S S S S S S SS M MM MM M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M SD SD SD SD
SD
SUSAN DR EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PROTECT EXISTING 27'' STORM DRAIN 15 N89°08'32"W 127.83' N0°55'34"E 2560.98' 1 1 30 20 30 31 32 32 33 33 30N0°55'34"E 168.08' X X X X 8 8 8 8 28 29 27 8 8 8 15 16 X X X X X X 32 32 1 1 1 1 1 3333 33 33 27 S89°03'34"E 74.54'

SUSAN DR LA ESTRELLA ST
WILDOMAR TRAIL PEGGY LN CC101 (CS106 NOT USED) CS104 CS105 CS102 CS103 CS101 CS107 CS108IMPROVEMENT NOTES CONSTRUCT ALL-WEATHER DECOMPOSED GRANITE SURFACE PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. INSTALL GATE VALVE BOX, FRAME AND COVER PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 703. INSTALL 8'' SEWER MAIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 818 AND NUMBER 817. INSTALL 48'' SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 604. INSTALL 8" WATER LINE PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 817 AND NUMBER 818. INSTALL TRAFFIC RATED PAVERS PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. CONSTRUCT FLAGSTONE PATH PER LANDSCAPING PLANS. INSTALL FENCING PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. INSTALL DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATH PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. INSTALL 5' PCC SIDEWALK PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. INSTALL PREFABRICATED CULVERT STRUCTURE PER SEPARATE CULVERT PLANS. CONSTRUCT 32' ASPHALT SECTION PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 94. CONSTRUCT 32' ASPHALT SECTION PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 94. INSTALL VEGETATIVE SWALE PER DETAIL ON SHEET CP103. CONSTRUCT 6' DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL; SEE DETAIL ON SHEET LC504. CONSTRUCT 8' DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL; SEE DETAIL ON SHEET LC504. CONSTRUCT 4' DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL; SEE DETAIL ON SHEET LC504. CONSTRUCT 4' NATIVE TRAIL; SEE DETAIL ON SHEET LC504. INSTALL WOOD TIMBER STEPS PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. INSTALL BATHROOM STRUCTURE PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. INSTALL SHADE STRUCTURE AT PICNIC AREA PER ARCHITECTURE/STRUCTURAL PLAN. INSTALL 3'X3' CURB INLET CATCH BASIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 300 OR APPROVED MID-STATE CONCRETE DRAIN INLET EQUIVALENT. CONSTRUCT RIP RAP ENERGY DISSIPATOR WITH 4"-6" SMOOTH RIVER ROCK (12 sf MIN). INSTALL 18" HDPE STORM DRAIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. (SLOPE=0.005 FT/FT MINIMUM) INSTALL 12" HDPE STORM DRAIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. (SLOPE=0.005 FT/FT MINIMUM) INSTALL 18" PERFORATED HDPE STORM DRAIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. (SLOPE=0.005 FT/FT MINIMUM) INSTALL 24" MID-STATE CONCRETE DRAIN INLET OR APPROVED EQUAL. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CHANNEL PER DETAIL ON SHEET CP111. INSTALL DEPRESSION AREA PER DETAIL ON SHEET CP111. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE SEAT WALL PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAVER PARKING LOT DRIVEWAY WITH PARKING STALLS PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. INSTALL 4" WHITE STRIPE PER THE 2014 CA MUTCD. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR MEDIAN FEATURES. INSTALL SYNTHETIC TURF PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAVING PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. CONSTRUCT 20' WIDE (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY WITH SIDEWALK AT CURB PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 207. 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536 NOTE: MARK BY DATE ENGINEER REVISIONS CITY APPR. DATE SEAL-ENGINEER: R.C.E. No. BENCHMARK: SCALE: H: V: SHEET No. The private engineer signing these plans is responsible for assuring the accuracy and acceptability of the design hereon. In the event of discrepancies arising after City acceptance or during construction, the private engineer shall be responsible for determining an acceptable solution and revising the plans for acceptance by the City. WORK CONTAINED WITHIN THESE PLANS SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. EXP. San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 32332 Camino Capistrano #205, RRM DESIGN GROUP (949) 361-7950 # CITY OF WILDOMAR 27 ACRE PARK Elevation = ________ Datum = _________ BENCHMARK # _____________ THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED ON (date) BY (surveyor) L.S. (number), EXP. (date) As Noted As Noted CITY OF WILDOMAR Daniel A. York, Director of Public Works/ Date: ACCEPTANCE AS TO CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY STANDARDS AND PRACTICES ACCEPTED BY:City Engineer, PE 43212 PREPARED BY: N:\1000\1064-01-RC17-27-Acre-Park\Engineering\ConDocs\Sheet-Files\C-3.x Construction Plans.dwg, CS101, Jun 02, 2022 3:06pm, ngwalters 0 40 feet 1"=20' 20 60 CS101 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 792
L L L M M M M M MM S S S S SS S S SS S S SS SS SS SS S S S S S S S LMS MSS S S S SD PROTECT EXISTING WATER SERVICE LINE PROTECT EXISTING TREES END OF TRAIL #4 21 18 18 17 16 16 16 16 16 Δ=130°54'13" R=14.00' L=31.99' Δ=111°22'06" R=60.00' L=116.62' Δ=98°25'15" R=36.00' L=61.84' Δ=96°47'08" R=35.00' L=59.12' S45°28'33"E L = 42.56' Δ=20°47'59" R=150.00' L=54.45' S66°16'32"E L = 55.77' Δ=181°45'16" R=30.00' L=95.17' N68°01'48"W L = 56.25' Δ=9°16'59" R=150.00' N58°44'50"W L=24.30' L = 27.74' Δ=168°18'31" R=21.00' L=61.69' S70°26'19"E L = 53.92' Δ=64°40'51" R=60.00' L=67.73' N44°52'50"E L = 74.69' Δ=32°28'41" R=150.00' L=85.03' Δ=4°12'17" R=546.00' L=40.07' Δ=6°54'18" R=90.00' L=10.85' N71°50'02"W L = 20.56' Δ=21°41'07" R=20.00' L=7.57' N86°28'51"E L = 12.74' Δ=53°21'27" R=24.00' L=22.35' S40°09'43"E L = 11.91' Δ=131°00'07" R=14.00' L=32.01' Δ=87°05'59" R=35.00' L=53.21' N15°15'57"E L = 14.70' Δ=90°35'33" R=37.00' L=58.50' Δ=13°26'47" R=250.00' L=58.67' Δ=56°48'25" ALC504 B LC504 23 Δ=86°57'39" R=42.00' L=63.75' Δ=22°01'08" R=86.00' L=33.05' Δ=63°55'31" R=19.00' L=21.20' 34

SUSAN DR LA ESTRELLA ST
WILDOMAR TRAIL PEGGY LN CC101 (CS106 NOT USED) CS104 CS105 CS102 CS103 CS101 CS107 CS108IMPROVEMENT NOTES CONSTRUCT ALL-WEATHER DECOMPOSED GRANITE SURFACE PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. INSTALL GATE VALVE BOX, FRAME AND COVER PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 703. INSTALL 8'' SEWER MAIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 818 AND NUMBER 817. INSTALL 48'' SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 604. INSTALL 8" WATER LINE PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 817 AND NUMBER 818. INSTALL TRAFFIC RATED PAVERS PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. CONSTRUCT FLAGSTONE PATH PER LANDSCAPING PLANS. INSTALL FENCING PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. INSTALL DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATH PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. INSTALL 5' PCC SIDEWALK PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. INSTALL PREFABRICATED CULVERT STRUCTURE PER SEPARATE CULVERT PLANS. CONSTRUCT 32' ASPHALT SECTION PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 94. CONSTRUCT 32' ASPHALT SECTION PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 94. INSTALL VEGETATIVE SWALE PER DETAIL ON SHEET CP103. CONSTRUCT 6' DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL; SEE DETAIL ON SHEET LC504. CONSTRUCT 8' DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL; SEE DETAIL ON SHEET LC504. CONSTRUCT 4' DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL; SEE DETAIL ON SHEET LC504. CONSTRUCT 4' NATIVE TRAIL; SEE DETAIL ON SHEET LC504. INSTALL WOOD TIMBER STEPS PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. INSTALL BATHROOM STRUCTURE PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. INSTALL SHADE STRUCTURE AT PICNIC AREA PER ARCHITECTURE/STRUCTURAL PLAN. INSTALL 3'X3' CURB INLET CATCH BASIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 300 OR APPROVED MID-STATE CONCRETE DRAIN INLET EQUIVALENT. CONSTRUCT RIP RAP ENERGY DISSIPATOR WITH 4"-6" SMOOTH RIVER ROCK (12 sf MIN). INSTALL 18" HDPE STORM DRAIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. (SLOPE=0.005 FT/FT MINIMUM) INSTALL 12" HDPE STORM DRAIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. (SLOPE=0.005 FT/FT MINIMUM) INSTALL 18" PERFORATED HDPE STORM DRAIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. (SLOPE=0.005 FT/FT MINIMUM) INSTALL 24" MID-STATE CONCRETE DRAIN INLET OR APPROVED EQUAL. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CHANNEL PER DETAIL ON SHEET CP111. INSTALL DEPRESSION AREA PER DETAIL ON SHEET CP111. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE SEAT WALL PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAVER PARKING LOT DRIVEWAY WITH PARKING STALLS PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. INSTALL 4" WHITE STRIPE PER THE 2014 CA MUTCD. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR MEDIAN FEATURES. INSTALL SYNTHETIC TURF PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAVING PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. CONSTRUCT 20' WIDE (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY WITH SIDEWALK AT CURB PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 207. 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536 NOTE: MARK BY DATE ENGINEER REVISIONS CITY APPR. DATE SEAL-ENGINEER: R.C.E. No. BENCHMARK: SCALE: H: V: SHEET No. The private engineer signing these plans is responsible for assuring the accuracy and acceptability of the design hereon. In the event of discrepancies arising after City acceptance or during construction, the private engineer shall be responsible for determining an acceptable solution and revising the plans for acceptance by the City. WORK CONTAINED WITHIN THESE PLANS SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. EXP. San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 32332 Camino Capistrano #205, RRM DESIGN GROUP (949) 361-7950 # CITY OF WILDOMAR 27 ACRE PARK Elevation = ________ Datum = _________ BENCHMARK # _____________ THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED ON (date) BY (surveyor) L.S. (number), EXP. (date) As Noted As Noted CITY OF WILDOMAR Daniel A. York, Director of Public Works/ Date: ACCEPTANCE AS TO CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY STANDARDS AND PRACTICES ACCEPTED BY:City Engineer, PE 43212 PREPARED BY: N:\1000\1064-01-RC17-27-Acre-Park\Engineering\ConDocs\Sheet-Files\C-3.x Construction Plans.dwg, CS102, Jun 02, 2022 3:06pm, ngwalters 0 40 feet 1"=20' 20 60 CS102 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 793
L L L L M MM M SS S S L L L L L L L S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS SSS SS SSS S S S S M M M M M M M M M MM M M M SD SD 21 18 18 18 18 19 18 18 18 18 17 Δ=114°58'02" R=35.00' Δ=110°13'07" L=70.23' R=20.00' L=38.47' 19 19 Δ=110°13'24" R=28.00' L=53.87' 11 19 Δ=6°54'18" R=90.00' L=10.85' Δ=56°48'25" R=64.00' L=63.45' Δ=49°30'58" R=41.00' L=35.43' N11°47'47"E L = 51.79' Δ=89°38'07" R=40.00' L=62.58' Δ=25°52'31" R=38.00' L=17.16' Δ=90°21'15" R=24.00' L=37.85' Δ=53°50'06" R=31.00' N35°31'47"W L = 14.45' N49°42'31"W L = 12.72' Δ=41°40'31" R=10.00' L=7.27' N86°27'32"W L = 7.27' Δ=89°20'55" R=21.00' L=32.75' N2°53'23"E L = 18.06' Δ=16°51'03" R=36.00' L=10.59' N13°57'40"W L = 12.65' Δ=23°23'57" R=53.00' L=21.64' N37°21'37"W L = 12.16' Δ=59°53'52" R=22.00' L=23.00' S82°44'32"W L = 15.56' Δ=78°39'52" R=19.00' L=26.09' S4°04'40"W L = 20.11' Δ=158°58'27" R=20.00' L=55.49' N16°56'53"W L = 9.84' Δ=28°30'48" R=25.00' N45°27'41"W L=12.44' L = 19.60' Δ=31°22'19" R=35.00' L=19.16' N14°05'22"W L = 2.50' N67°15'37"E L = 10.19' Δ=36°42'49" R=12.00' L=7.69' S76°01'34"E L = 11.97' Δ=54°02'19" R=12.00' L=11.32' N49°56'07"E L = 4.04' Δ=75°09'48" R=10.00' L=13.12' S54°54'06"E L = 6.33' Δ=52°23'11" R=60.00' L=54.86' N72°42'43"E L = 16.61' Δ=37°36'40" R=20.00' L=13.13' S69°40'37"E L = 6.47' Δ=29°32'41" R=20.00' L=10.31' S40°07'56"E L = 12.40' Δ=25°37'36" R=30.00' L=13.42' S14°30'19"E L = 17.83' Δ=16°06'55" R=17.00' L=4.78' S1°36'36"W L = 23.52' Δ=32°03'39" R=17.00' L=9.51' S33°40'15"W L = 18.58' Δ=28°30'17" R=10.00' L=4.98' S5°09'58"W L = 6.56' N30°44'28"E L = 2.49' Δ=60°48'40" R=12.00' L=12.74' N30°04'12"W L = 18.91' Δ=7°58'12" R=210.00' L=29.21' N38°02'24"W L = 22.32' Δ=169°24'51" R=8.00' L=23.65' S48°37'34"E L = 46.10' Δ=14°22'29" R=12.00' L=3.01' S63°00'03"E L = 20.58' Δ=163°30'46" R=8.00' L=22.83' N46°30'48"W L = 20.67' Δ=4°35'45" R=12.00' L=0.96' N51°06'33"W L = 32.96' Δ=166°19'04" R=8.00' L=23.22' S64°47'29"E L = 23.16' Δ=17°51'50" R=20.00' L=6.24' S82°39'19"E L = 24.30' Δ=158°21'00" R=11.00' L=30.40' N61°00'18"W L = 62.14' Δ=171°15'16" R=16.00' L=47.82' S69°45'02"E L = 16.01' Δ=58°56'58" R=16.00' L=16.46' ALC504 ALC504 ALC504 ALC504 ALC504 LC504 A 26 24 25 27 27 27 23 Δ=122°34'32" R=10.00' L=21.39' Δ=86°57'39" R=42.00' L=63.75' Δ=46°13'59" R=76.00' L=61.33' Δ=128°03'03" R=38.00' L=84.93' Δ=28°09'52" R=63.00' L=30.97' Δ=63°09'31" R=36.00' L=39.68' Δ=50°07'09" R=57.00' L=49.86' Δ=39°32'31" R=35.00' L=24.15' Δ=33°11'46" R=70.00' L=40.56' Δ=31°39'37" R=35.00' L=19.34' Δ=22°01'08" R=86.00' L=33.05' Δ=63°55'31" R=19.00' L=21.20' Δ=78°41'18" R=10.00' L=13.73' Δ=108°56'03" R=2.00' L=3.80' 35 35 34 19 X 18 17 11 8 20 11 18 X

SUSAN DR LA ESTRELLA ST
WILDOMAR TRAIL PEGGY LN CC101 (CS106 NOT USED) CS104 CS105 CS102 CS103 CS101 CS107 CS108IMPROVEMENT NOTES CONSTRUCT ALL-WEATHER DECOMPOSED GRANITE SURFACE PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. INSTALL GATE VALVE BOX, FRAME AND COVER PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 703. INSTALL 8'' SEWER MAIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 818 AND NUMBER 817. INSTALL 48'' SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 604. INSTALL 8" WATER LINE PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 817 AND NUMBER 818. INSTALL TRAFFIC RATED PAVERS PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. CONSTRUCT FLAGSTONE PATH PER LANDSCAPING PLANS. INSTALL FENCING PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. INSTALL DECOMPOSED GRANITE PATH PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. INSTALL 5' PCC SIDEWALK PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. INSTALL PREFABRICATED CULVERT STRUCTURE PER SEPARATE CULVERT PLANS. CONSTRUCT 32' ASPHALT SECTION PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 94. CONSTRUCT 32' ASPHALT SECTION PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 94. INSTALL VEGETATIVE SWALE PER DETAIL ON SHEET CP103. CONSTRUCT 6' DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL; SEE DETAIL ON SHEET LC504. CONSTRUCT 8' DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL; SEE DETAIL ON SHEET LC504. CONSTRUCT 4' DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL; SEE DETAIL ON SHEET LC504. CONSTRUCT 4' NATIVE TRAIL; SEE DETAIL ON SHEET LC504. INSTALL WOOD TIMBER STEPS PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. INSTALL BATHROOM STRUCTURE PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. INSTALL SHADE STRUCTURE AT PICNIC AREA PER ARCHITECTURE/STRUCTURAL PLAN. INSTALL 3'X3' CURB INLET CATCH BASIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 300 OR APPROVED MID-STATE CONCRETE DRAIN INLET EQUIVALENT. CONSTRUCT RIP RAP ENERGY DISSIPATOR WITH 4"-6" SMOOTH RIVER ROCK (12 sf MIN). INSTALL 18" HDPE STORM DRAIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. (SLOPE=0.005 FT/FT MINIMUM) INSTALL 12" HDPE STORM DRAIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. (SLOPE=0.005 FT/FT MINIMUM) INSTALL 18" PERFORATED HDPE STORM DRAIN PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. (SLOPE=0.005 FT/FT MINIMUM) INSTALL 24" MID-STATE CONCRETE DRAIN INLET OR APPROVED EQUAL. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CHANNEL PER DETAIL ON SHEET CP111. INSTALL DEPRESSION AREA PER DETAIL ON SHEET CP111. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE SEAT WALL PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAVER PARKING LOT DRIVEWAY WITH PARKING STALLS PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. INSTALL 4" WHITE STRIPE PER THE 2014 CA MUTCD. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR MEDIAN FEATURES. INSTALL SYNTHETIC TURF PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAVING PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. CONSTRUCT 20' WIDE (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY WITH SIDEWALK AT CURB PER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STANDARD NUMBER 207. 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536 NOTE: MARK BY DATE ENGINEER REVISIONS CITY APPR. DATE SEAL-ENGINEER: R.C.E. No. BENCHMARK: SCALE: H: V: SHEET No. The private engineer signing these plans is responsible for assuring the accuracy and acceptability of the design hereon. In the event of discrepancies arising after City acceptance or during construction, the private engineer shall be responsible for determining an acceptable solution and revising the plans for acceptance by the City. WORK CONTAINED WITHIN THESE PLANS SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. EXP. San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 32332 Camino Capistrano #205, RRM DESIGN GROUP (949) 361-7950 # CITY OF WILDOMAR 27 ACRE PARK Elevation = ________ Datum = _________ BENCHMARK # _____________ THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED ON (date) BY (surveyor) L.S. (number), EXP. (date) As Noted As Noted CITY OF WILDOMAR Daniel A. York, Director of Public Works/ Date: ACCEPTANCE AS TO CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY STANDARDS AND PRACTICES ACCEPTED BY:City Engineer, PE 43212 PREPARED BY: N:\1000\1064-01-RC17-27-Acre-Park\Engineering\ConDocs\Sheet-Files\C-3.x Construction Plans.dwg, CS103, Jun 02, 2022 3:06pm, ngwalters 0 40 feet 1"=20' 20 60 CS103 CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 794
L L L L S S S S SS SSS SS SSS S S S S S S M MM M M M M M M M S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W SD SD 16 18 18 18 Δ=15°11'09" R=50.00' L=13.25' N65°05'47"E L = 17.16' Δ=62°41'29" R=40.00' L=43.77' N2°24'18"E L = 25.75' Δ=33°18'10" R=15.00' L=8.72' N35°42'28"E L = 11.10' Δ=24°28'53" R=11.00' L=4.70' N60°11'21"E L = 4.14' Δ=22°14'21" R=10.00' L=3.88' N82°25'42"E L = 5.64' Δ=24°14'20" R=18.00' L=7.61' N58°11'22"E L = 8.08' Δ=19°13'43" R=20.00' L=6.71' N38°57'39"E L = 15.46' Δ=101°24'39" R=25.00' L=44.25' S39°37'42"E L = 6.86'Δ=140°06'38" R=12.00' L=29.34' N0°15'40"E L = 11.15' Δ=7°49'55" R=200.00' L=27.34' N8°05'36"E L = 6.86'Δ=169°24'38" R=8.00' L=23.65' S2°29'46"E L = 28.11' Δ=3°53'53" R=9.00' L=0.61' S6°23'39"E L = 14.86' Δ=11°57'19" R=9.00' L=1.88' S18°20'58"E L = 13.82' N5°14'52"W L = 20.40' N27°27'04"E L = 6.48' Δ=55°04'38" R=35.00' L=33.64' N27°37'34"W L = 18.06' Δ=45°55'52" R=66.00' L=52.91' N18°18'19"E L = 53.75' Δ=53°50'06" R=31.00' L=29.13' N35°31'47"W L = 14.45' N49°42'31"W L = 12.72' Δ=41°40'31" R=10.00' L=7.27' S33°40'15"W L = 18.58' S5°09'58"W L = 6.56' N57°46'45"W L = 3.16' Δ=45°27'10" R=49.00' L=38.87' S76°46'06"W L = 6.12' Δ=23°51'15" R=261.50' L=108.87' B LC504 ALC504 ALC504 ALC504 28 35 35 11 B-B LC504 23 23 24 24 22 10 8 27 8 10 15 32 36 13 10 14 10 14 13 10 36 7 10 32 1510 10 18 8 20 18 11

WILDOMAR TRAIL ROAD

Wildomar City CouncilOctober 11, 2023

Wildomar City Council
October 11, 2023