WOODLAKE CITY
Mayor Mendoza • Vice-Mayor Ortiz • Councilmember Martinez • Councilmember Valero • Councilmember Wallace
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL
350 N Valencia Blvd, Woodlake, CA 93286
559-564-8055 • www.cityofwoodlake.com
Date: March 25, 2024 (Monday)
Time: 6:30 p.m.
Place: City Council Chambers
145 N. Magnolia
Woodlake CA 93286
TELECONFERENCE MEETING
Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89176141818
Meeting ID: 891 7614 1818
One tap mobile
+16699009128,89176141818# US (San Jose)
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the California Ralph M. Brown Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, including auxiliary aids, translation requests, or other accommodations, or to be able to access this agenda and documents in the agenda packet, please contact City Hall at 559-564-8055 at least 3 days prior to the meeting.
The full agenda including staff reports and supporting materials are available at City Hall.
I. CALL TO ORDER & WELCOME
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE
IV. PUBLIC COMMENT
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Council on items within its jurisdiction but not on this agenda. NOTE: Prior to action by the Council on any item on this agenda, the public may comment on that item.
Unscheduled comments may be limited to 3 minutes.
All items on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine and noncontroversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. Items pulled from the Calendar will be considered separately.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR –ACTION AND INFORMATION ITEMS
Request Approval of the Consent Calendar Action Items (IV A-C) A. Action: Approval of Minutes of the regular meeting held on March 11, 2024 (Pages 27)
B. Action: Approval of Warrants (Pages 28-77)
C. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of the Purchase of the Property with APN No. 060-073-010 for the Construction of the City of Woodlake Civic Center and Reaffirm Resolution No. 24-31 (Pages 78-81) V. ACTION/DISCUSSION ITEM
A. Information: Recognize Woodlake High School Sports
B. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of Certification for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Final Environmental Impact Report PUBLIC HEARING (Pages 82-177)
C. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approve the Acquisition of the Lot(s) with APN No. 061-140-069 and 061-140-070 as Appraised Value Using PLHA Funds and Authorize the City Administrator to Execute all Necessary Documents (Pages 178-218)
D. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Greenwood Subdivision Phase I and II Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02 – PUBLIC HEARING (Pages 219-246) E. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Solicit and Consider Input on Possible Competitive and Supplemental Activities to Include in a 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application and Authorize Staff to Proceed with the Application PUBLIC HEARING (Pages 247-251)
F. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of a Categorical Exemption and Categorical Exclusion for the Kaweah Storm Drain Improvement Project (Pages 252-291)
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Information: Items from Staff
B. Information: Items from Council Member
C. Request from Council Members for Future Agenda Items VII. CLOSED SESSION
As provided in the Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code sections 54950 et seq., the Governing Board may meet in closed session with members of its staff and its attorneys.
These sessions are not open to the public and may not be attended by members of the public. The matters the Council will meet on in closed session are identified below or are those matters appropriately identified in open session as requiring immediate attention and arising after the
posting of the agenda. Any public reports of action taken in the closed session will be made in accordance with Government Code sections 54957.1 “Documents: If distributed to the Council less than 72 hours before a regular meeting, any public records which are subject to public inspection and pertain to an open-session item on the regular meeting agenda shall be available at the following address at the time they are distributed to a majority of the Council: 350 North Valencia Boulevard, Woodlake, California 93286. Public records distributed to the Council at a public meeting will be available to the public at such meeting if they were prepared by the City.
Exemptions and details in Government Code§ 54957.5 (a) shall apply.” II. ADJOURN
The next scheduled City Council meeting will be held on Monday, April 8, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. at City Council Chambers, located at 145 N. Magnolia, Woodlake, CA 93286 or via Zoom.
City Council:
Rudy Mendoza – Mayor
Frances Ortiz - Vice Mayor
William Valero – Councilmember
Misty Wallace – Councilmember
Jose L. Martinez - Councilmember
WOODLAKE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 11, 2024
PRESENT: Mendoza, Ortiz, Martinez, Wallace & Valero
VIA ZOOM:
PRESENT: Lara, Zamora, Marquez, Llamas, Reynolds, Bolanos & Zacarias ABSENT:
FLAG SALUTE
Public Comment
Melinda Morales, Representative for CASA – Ms. Morales gave a presentation regarding the CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocate) program. CASA is looking to recruit new members and will offer a training class in the City of Woodlake on March 13th at Our Place Café.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR –ACTION AND INFORMATION ITEMS
Request Approval of the Consent Calendar Action Items (IV A-C) A. Action: Approval of Minutes of the regular meeting held on February 12, 2024 B. Action: Approval of Warrants
C. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of the February 2024 Monthly Report of Investments
ON A MOTION BY ORTIZ, SECOND BY VALERO, IT WAS VOTED
TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR. APPROVED
UNANIMOUSLY BY ROLL CALL VOTE.
V. ACTION/DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Information: Recognize U.S. Towers as the Recycler of the Year TJ Hamon, representative for MidValley Disposal presented award to U.S. Towers and thanked them for their continuous compliance with the recycle program.
B. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of Certification for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Final Environmental Impact Report – PUBLIC HEARING Community Development Director Llamas reported the following: The City of Woodlake circulated an Initial Study (IS) and Notice of Preparation (NOP) (referred to collectively as “NOP”) of the EIR for the proposed Project from May 4, 2022, to June 3, 2022 to trustee and responsible agencies, the State Clearinghouse (State Clearinghouse #2022040640), and the public. Following publication of the original NOP, changes were made to the proposed Project that consisted of an increase in project acreage and a change in Land Use Designation. The IS/NOP was recirculated to the public, trustee and responsible agencies, and the State Clearinghouse from October 12, 2022, to November 14, 2022.
The Draft EIR was properly noticed and circulated for public review and comment for 45 days, from May 10, 2023, through June 26, 2023. The Notice of Availability was published in the Sun Gazette on May 10, 2023. The Draft EIR and Appendices were sent to the State Clearinghouse for distribution and notices were mailed to local agencies and other interested individuals. The City received two comment letters on the Draft EIR within the public review period. Each letter is reproduced in its entirety in Chapter Two of this Final EIR and responses are shown after each comment, which can be seen in the attached Final EIR document.
Under CEQA, the Lead Agency must prepare and certify a Final EIR prior to a proposed project being approved.
1 The City of Woodlake is the Lead Agency on the project and has prepared a Final environmental Impact Report on the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park which includes expanding an existing industrial area by developing a 1.5 million square foot industrial center on a 113-acre site that will house various industrial uses. The complete Project description, location and the potential environmental effects are contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report.
The Final EIR allows the public and the City an opportunity to review revisions to the Draft EIR and the responses to comments received during the Draft EIRs public review period. The Final EIR serves as the environmental document to inform the City of the environmental consequences of the proposed project, either in whole or in part, or one of the alternatives to the project discussed in the Draft EIR.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: 6:41 PM
Victoria Yundt, Member Lozeau Drury LLP – Ms. Yundt submitted her concerns via email. Anyone interested may request audio minutes or complete package submitted to the city.
Josh Diaz, 556 W. Kaweah, Woodlake – Mr. Diaz asked staff if the response to Ms.
Yundt’s concerns would be available to the public. City staff stated yes.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 6:48 PM
ON A MOTION BY MARTINEZ SECOND BY WALLACE IT WAS VOTED TO
ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AND APPROVE THE CERTIFICATION FOR
THE WOODLAKE HOLDINGS INDUSTRIAL PARK FINAL
ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY BY
ROLL CALL VOTE.
C. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Extension of a Declaration of Local State of Emergency by the City of Woodlake
City Administrator Lara reported the following: On March 14, 2023, the City of Woodlake declared a Local State of Emergency due to the excessive rainfall and snowmelt that resulted in uncontrolled water coming in from local rivers, streams and creeks. The City had extreme flooding citywide and both public facilities and private structures were damaged.
City of Woodlake’s Public Works, the Woodlake Fire District and Cal Fire spent weeks removing water, debris and mud from streets, sidewalks, and the exteriors of homes. Public works spent weeks helping residents remove damaged materials and furniture from residences.
With continued work on local stormwater systems the City wishes to extend its Local State of Emergency to better prepare the City and its residents. The City has concerns that future rain or snowmelt could overwhelm local rivers, streams, creeks, stormwater lines and basins throughout the City. This could lead to additional damage to public facilities and private structures and contribute to health and safety concerns.
The City has worked with FEMA to help local residents receive much needed assistance and in getting the City reimbursed for damage, caused citywide by extensive flooding.
The process of getting the City reimbursed is ongoing. The City continues to wrap up other maintenance and upgrade projects such as stormwater and sewer lift station projects.
ON A MOTION BY ORTIZ SECOND BY VALERO IT WAS VOTED TO
ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AND APPROVE THR EXTENSION OF A
DECLARATION OF LOCAL STATE OF EMERGENCY BY THE CITY OF
WOODLAKE. APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY BY ROLL CALL VOTE.
D. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of the City of Woodlake’s Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Budget Amendment No. 3
City Administrator Lara reported the following: Annually, City staff submits to City Council, a draft budget. The draft budget is submitted at scheduled Council meetings, which are open to the public. The purpose of the budgeting process is to propose necessary expenditures and the means of funding them. Occasionally, budget 2 amendments will be necessary to cover unexpected expenditures or note unexpected revenues. Amendments will be presented to the Council for approval.
Below is a summary of the key changes as shown in the attached Budget Amendment No.3:
1. Increase in General Fund Revenues – Utility Users Tax
2. Increase in General Fund Revenues – Building Permits
3. Increase in Stormwater Fund Expenses – Kaweah Stormwater Project
ON A MOTION BY ORTIZ SECOND BY VALERO IT WAS VOTED TO
ADOOPT THE RESOLUTION AND APPROVE THE CITY OF WOODLAKE’S FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 3 APPROVED
UNANIMOUSLY BY ROLL CALL VOTE.
E. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of the Purchase of the Property with APN No. 060-070-010 for the Construction of the City of Woodlake Civic Cente City Administrator Lara reported the following: The City of Woodlake currently operates all City Administrative and Police services out of a single building. The entire Police Department currently operates in approximately 2,500 sqft of floor space including lobby, interview rooms, evidence rooms, storage, dispatch, holding areas, IT closets and office space. The City had to move evidence out of the Police Department and into storage units due to the lack of space. As the City of Woodlake continues to grow, foot traffic and requests for services will continue to increase at a rapid pace, putting more strain on an already at-capacity building. The current layout of City Hall and the Police Station also presents occupational hazards and privacy concerns. Inperson requests for police assistance are made in a shared lobby with City Hall where others may hear their conversations. Filing a report requires victims to enter the lobby in the presence of people conducting regular City business (paying bills, signing up for services, etc.) and may deter the victim from filing the report.
The City of Woodlake worked with Senator Hurtado to address the current space needs for both the Woodlake Police Department and City Hall. The Senator was able to help procure seven million dollars for the construction of a new Civic Center in the City of Woodlake. The City is proposing to develop a ~10,000 sqft Civic Center that would serve three functions:
1. Police Department Administration
2. City Hall Administration
3. Citizen Service Center (CSC).
The Citizen Service Center would be available to the public for community meetings, used as a heating/cooling center throughout the year and would be equipped with technology that will allow it to function as a base of operations for emergency services.
ON A MOTION BY MARTINEZ, SECOND BY WALLACE IT WAS VOTED TO
ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AND APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF
PROPERTY WITH APN NO. 060-070-010 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WOODLAKE CIVIC CENTER. APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY BY ROLL
CALL VOTE.
F. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approve the Purchase for the Right of Way Associated with the Antelope Creek Park Project and Authorize the City Administrator to Execute All Necessary Documents.
City Administrator Lara reported the following: The City submitted an application for the Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program (Round 4) and was awarded $8,461,294 for Antelope Creek Park. The Project has cleared environmental review and is currently in the design and right of way phases.
City Staff, in conjunction with its right of way consultant Hamner Jewell Associates has been working with those owners who are adjacent to Antelope Creek Park to procure necessary right of way for offsite park improvements. The City will need to purchase a sliver of the property from the following two APN’s to complete street improvements adjacent to the park.
3 1. Property 1: 060-050-006-000 – Purchase Price $1,000.00
2. Property 2: 060-180-013-000 – Purchase Price $45,355.00
ON A MOTION BY MENDOZA SECOND BY MARTINEZ IT WAS VOTED
TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AND APPROVE THE PURCHASE FOR THE
RIGHT OF WAY ASSOCIATED WITH THE ANTELOPE CREEK PARK
PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSART DOCUMENTS. APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY BY ROLL
CALL VOTE.
G. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Initiate the Formation of the Greenwood Phase I & II Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02
Community Development Director Llamas reported the following: An application was submitted for the formation of Greenwood Phase I & II Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02 by the Developer D.R. Horton CA3 INC. The subdivision will consist of one hundred and thirty-three residential units and four lots that have been dedicated to the City. The four lots consist of a park, and three landscaping strips that will be maintained by the City.
All properties comprising the Greenwood Phase I & II Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02 have been entered into the District by the Developer of the Tract as per the ‘Conditions of Approval” for recordation of those Tracts, and per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
The one hundred and thirty-three properties comprising the Subdivision have all been found to benefit from landscaping, street lighting, park space and therefore are to be assessed for their proportionate share of the costs incurred by those benefits.
ON A MOTION BY MARTINEZ SECOND BY VALERO IT WAS VOTED TO
ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AND INITIATE THE FORMATION OF THE
GREENWOOD PHASE I & II LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 22-02. APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY BY ROLL CALL VOTE.
H. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Solicit and Consider Input on Possible Competitive and Supplemental Activities to Include in a 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application and Authorize Staff to Proceed with the Application
PUBLIC COMMENT
Community Development Director Llamas reported the following: CDBG Program regulations require that the City conduct a public hearing on all CDBG-related matters to provide for and encourage citizen participation, particularly by low and moderate income persons who reside in areas in which CDBG funds are used. Therefore, when the public hearing is opened, the public will be invited to comment on possible competitive and supplemental activities to include in a 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application.
Public notices in both English and Spanish will be published in the February 21, 2024 and February 28, 2024 issues of The Sun-Gazette Newspaper notifying the public of public hearings on both March 11, 2024 and March 25, 2024 regarding the 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application.
On January 31, 2024, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) is announcing the release of Amendment #1 to the 2023 CDBG Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). The original NOFA was for approximately $19 million in federal funds for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program only for applications from projects that remain on the waitlist established for Over-the-Counter projects after the 2019-2020 NOFA. This amendment makes another $19 million for Housing, Community Development and Economic Development Projects in an Over-the-Counter process.
Funding for this NOFA is available to the state from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), pursuant to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, and 24 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 570 Subpart I “State Community Development Block Grant Program”. These regulations require the state to make funds available to the state’s non-entitlement Units of Local 4 Government. Units of general local government are defined by HUD as political subdivisions of the state, which in California are towns, cities, and counties. Only nonfederally recognized Tribes can receive funding through applications submitted by nonentitlement Units of Local Government. No direct funding from the Department can be provided to Tribes, Tribal Designated Housing Entities, or nonprofits.
The Application deadline will be when funds are exhausted or Tuesday April 30, 2024, whichever comes first. Applications will be accepted on a first come, first serve basis.
When the Public Comment period is opened, citizens are encouraged to ask questions about this CDBG funding opportunity and/or to provide input on which activities should be included in the City’s application. Citizens are also invited to submit written comments to the City of Woodlake, 350 N. Valencia Blvd., Woodlake, CA 93286.
A separate Public Hearing will be held on March 11, 2024, and March 25, 2024, to discuss and approve the application prior to submittal to HCD. All residents who may be impacted by the project have also been notified of the public hearing via an informational flyer.
PUBLIC COMMENT OPENED: 7:26 PM
David Vance, 574 W. Kaweah, Woodlake – Mr. Vance asked how this project would impact on the roads. City Administrator Lara stated the work would be done in phases to try and minimize the impact and allow for traffic circulation.
Sharon Vance, 574 W. Kaweah, Woodlake – Mrs. Vance thanked the city for this project and agrees it will solve some of the problems.
Josh Diaz, 556 W. Kaweah, Woodlake – Mr. Diaz thanked city staff for the project and also wanted to know if public could sign the sign in sheet at a later date.
Charles Mann, 749 N. Palm, Woodlake – Mr. Mann expressed his concern about the project being enough to alleviate the problem. City Administrator Lara stated city staff would do their best to get as much done as possible.
Josh Diaz, 556 W. Kaweah, Woodlake – Mr. Diaz asked staff to consider holding a community meeting outside of the council meetings. City Administrator Lara stated if anyone wanted to meet with staff with questions or concerns, they may call city hall and schedule a meeting.
PUBLIC COMMEMT CLOSED: 7:40 PM
ON A MOTION BY MARTINEZ SECOND BY ORTIZ IT WAS VOTED TO
ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AND SOLICIT AND CONSIDER INPUT ON
POSSIBLE COMPETITIVE AND SUPPLEMENTA ACTIVITIES TO INCLUDE IN A 2023 CDBG NOFA AMENDMENT #1 APPLCATION AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PROCEED WITH THE APPLICATION. APPROVED
UNANIMOULSY BY ROLL CALL VOTE.
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Information: Items from Staff
Community Services Director Reynolds – Reported updates on all upcoming events. Report is attached.
Community Development Director – Reported on current extensions of some CUP applications. Reported plans are in the work for a new Kaweah Delta clinic coming in to the empty lot across from Jack’s Gas on Valencia Blvd. Reported additional testing was done on city water with the concern of possible chlorine. All tests came back at safe levels for consumption.
Enrique Benavides, 509 E. Sequoia, Woodlake – Mr. Benavides asked if charcoal is used to test water to help with removal of chlorine. City Administrator stated no, not at this time.
5 David Singh, 101 S. Palm, Woodlake – Mr. Singh asked if there are any programs to help him develop his project. City Administrator Lara asked Mr. Singh to schedule an appointment with him so they may discuss this further.
City Attorney Zamora – Reported there is currently a new law dealing with homelessness in cities but believes this is not a problem in the City of Woodlake.
City Administrator Lara – Reported the 60 inch project near the garden is almost complete and there is about 72 ft to go for completion. Bravo St was completed last week and Magnolia St will be done this week.
Student Representative Bolanos – See attached report.
B. Information: Items from Council Members
Councilmember Martinez – Thanked Parks and Rec staff for the great job with all the sports.
Mayor Mendoza – Reported he will be in Sacramento next week.
VII. CLOSED SESSION
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
As provided in the Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code sections 54950 et seq., the Governing Board may meet in closed session with members of its staff and its attorneys. These sessions are not open to the public and may not be attended by members of the public. The matters the Council will meet on in closed session are identified below or are those matters appropriately identified in open session as requiring immediate attention and arising after the posting of the agenda. Any public reports of action taken in the closed session will be made in accordance with Government Code sections 54957.1.
“Documents: If distributed to the Council less than 72 hours before a regular meeting, any public records which are subject to public inspection and pertain to an open-session item on the regular meeting agenda shall be available at the following address at the time they are distributed to a majority of the Council: 350 North Valencia Boulevard, Woodlake, California 93286. Public records distributed to the Council at a public meeting will be available to the public at such meeting if they were prepared by the City.
Exemptions and details in Government Code§ 54957.5 (a) shall apply.” VIII. ADJOURN
The next scheduled City Council meeting will be held on Monday, February 26, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. at City Council Chambers located at 145 N. Magnolia, Woodlake, CA 93286 or via Zoom.
City Council:
Rudy Mendoza - Mayor
Frances Ortiz - Vice Mayor
Jose L. Martinez – Councilmember
William Valero – Councilmember
Misty Wallace - Councilmember
Meeting adjourned at 8:04 pm
Submitted by,
Irene Zacarias
City Clerk
6 CASA OF TULARE COUNTY
PRESENTATION TO
WOODLAKE CITY COUNCIL
7 WHAT IS A CASA?
CASA is an acronym which stands for
“court-appointed special advocate”
8 WHAT DOES A CASA DO?
A CASA investigates
Looks for changes in a child’s behavior, school performance, health and well-being
A CASA offers support
Stays with the child no matter how often their living situation changes
A CASA speaks up in court
Helps judges make the best decision for their welfare
9 OUTDOOR LEARNING
EXPERIENCING ART
ACTIVITIES
How does CASA help
children thrive?
10 Sequoia Riverlands Trust
& YMCA Camp
Planting trees
11 Sequoia Riverlands Trust
& Sequoia YMCA
The ROPES course
12 Sequoia Riverlands Trust
& YMCA Camp
Forming friendships
13 • Adoption Night • Art Night
• Math and Games Night • FREE Haircuts
ACTIVITIES
NIGHTS
14 CASA ADVOCATE
TRAINING
Classroom training
Voices of Experience
Swearing In
15 Classroom Training
20 hours classroom
instruction
+
10 hours
independent study
16 Youth Panel
Speaking to CASA
trainees
17 Dinuba Class
Final day of training
18 Swearing In
Takes place in
Tulare County
Juvenile Court
19 Courtroom
advocacy
Our advocates go
to court and
speak up on
behalf of the
child
20 CASA STATISTICS
CHILDREN AWAITING A CASA: 264
UNASSIGNED CASES: 153
ACTIVE VOLUNTEERS: 82
21 THANK YOU
TO VOLUNTEER, PLEASE CALL US!
CASA OF TULARE COUNTY
559-625-4007
www.casatulareco.org
22 23
24 25
FJ White
CRES
o
o
Gity Council Student Representative 3/11124
Evan Bolanos
Last week, WVMS students and staff presented at CRES. They presented the elective offerings, clubs, and exciting things our Future Bengals have to look fonrvard to next year!
Our Academic Coach led our second set of Action Walks this week. Staff visited classrooms and collected data aligned to our areas of focus to later calibrate and discuss how we are meeting our goals and what our next steps will be.
Last week, the Leadership Class organized a culminating activity to end our American Heart Challenge school-wide fundraiser. Students and staff were outside participating in heart-healthy activities. Thank you to Woodlake Fire and additional volunteers for assisting in the teaching of our Bengals CPR.
Parent Teacher Conferences are scheduled for 3129 (1:30-3:30 pm) o 3113 - Science Fair - Judging begins around 4:00. Open to parents and students 5:30 to 6:30 in the CRES multipurpose building
o 3/18 - 3122 Parent Teacher Conferences and Book Fair
o 3122 - Literacy Parade
o 4113 - Robotics and Esports lnvitational
o 4119 - Community Carnival at CRES
WVMS
o
26 WHS
. and 3121 (4-6 pm)
r The College and Career Fair is scheduled for Wednesday, March 20th from 9:30 am -12:00 pm
o
Attention Seniors and parents - We need to get that second bus filled up for grad night, or those of you that are signed up and on the second bus will not get to go. All GradNite Money Must be paid by tomorrow, March 12,2024.
Boys Varsity Baseballwill play at Mendota High School in the Caruthers Tournament.
Time tba.
a
27 City of Woodlake
Summary of Disbursments and Payroll
City Council Meeting March 25,2024
580,764.64
57,575.34
DISBURSMENTS / WARRANTS
PAYROLT
031081202a (City\
03/0812024 (Fire\
3/L9/2024
3l19/2024
3lL9/2024
3/19/2024
3/19/2024
3hs/2024
WIRES
PAYROLL TAX WIRE
5281,s01.1s
STso.oo
55so.oo
S1,soo.oo
STso.oo
STso.oo
USDA
USDA
USDA
USDA
Water Loan
Sewer Loan
Airport Loan
Fire Truck Loan
CITY
FI RE
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
$ 75,894.76
S 2,484.43
Total Wire Amount Sent Out 19
Lara
l, Ramon Lara, certify under penalty of perjury that the above listed accounts are correct, due and payable to the best of my knowledge.
City
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Woodlake on the 25th of March 2024.
by the following vote:
Mayor, Rudy Mendoza
Gross
Total Disbursments
Amount to be A d 32
City Clerk, lrene Zacarias
28 PAYROLL...
CHECK FORM
CHECK
NUMBER
0 L4231 2
L423'73
L423'7 4
L4231 5
L4237 6
1 Aa1.1'1 LazJ / /
L4237 8
L4237 9
L42380
1423BI
1 A 110-) L=ZJOJ
l_42384
L42385
L42386
l.42387
l.42388
l-42389
L42390
L4239r
142392
L42393
142394
L42395
C-BIWEEKLY
CHECK REGISTER
RUN- 03 / o6 /2024 12 .13
PR31lR-V14.23
11 PAGE 1
Paymate
q
STUB
PERIOD
DIRECT
1 DATTNG 2/L8/ZOZ+- 3/02/2024 CHECK DATE 3/08/ZOZ+
DEPOSIT IS TURNED ON
CHECK
SEQ
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,65L.15
2 ,286 .9r
4 ,944 .64
2 , B5'7 .35
2,721 .86
r,467 .04
2,6L0 .64
3,321.48
2 , L62 .5L
L, 45-7 . 07
r,3'72.50
2,350 " 02
L, 492 . 15
l,Bor.42
2 ,2',72 .06
1,852 .64
2 , LO5 .41
3,514.02
r ,947 .82
2 ,54a .46
r,9'72.38
7_,788.7r
3 ,289 .95
2 , 094 .22
CODE
516
233
208
565
,-1 n
206
234
225
201
t73
229
519
555
591
564
584
572
549
593
594
587
590
577
585
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
-L 5lUIJ
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
29 PAYROLL...
CHECK FORM
C=BIWEEKLY
CHECK REGISTER
RUN- 03 / o6 /2024 L2 .L3
PR31lR-V14.23
11 PAGE 2
Paymate
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
q
STUB
PERIOD
DIRECT
1 DATTNG 2/r8/zoz+- 3/02/zoz+
DEPOSIT IS TURNED ON
cHECK DATE z/oe/zoz+
CHECK
SEQ
CHECK
NUMBER
L42396
142391
]-42398
l-42399
L42400
L4240r
142402
a42403
L42404
L42405
142406
CHECK
AMOUNT
1-,788.59
1,818.9'7
1,818.07
2,556.11
2,0o1. B3
2 ,064 .06
L,631 .73
2,685 . 00
2 ,3'7 2 .3I
2,7r0.33
2,359 .57
CODE
2L5
l-34
232
zz5
) )'1
2LB
230
209
2IL
2r4
1BB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
TOTALS FOR CHECK FORM:
NEGOTIABLE CHECKS
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
STUB
*EMPLOYEE CHECKS
*VENDOR CHECKS
*BANK CHECKS
**TOTAL NEGOTIABLE
COUNTS
CHECKS
0 0
0 0
OTHER CHECKS
0 " 00
0.00 *MANUAL CHECKS
*CANCELLED CHECKS
0 0
O. OO **TOTAL FOR CHECK FORM
NON-NEGOTIABLB CHECKS
80,"/64.64
0.00 *DIRECT
*VENDOR
DEPOSIT
DIR DEP
STUBS
b l- urJ>
35 0
30 PAY INFORMATION
GROSS PAY
FEATURE DTSTRIB
CITY-GROSS REPORT_PAYROLL #18 lQ FY 23/24- O2/re TO 03/02 PAYDAY O UTION
2024 3/oe/24
RUN- 3/06/2024 ]-2: O5:30 PAGE lPR4B0R-V14.23 Paymate
EMP #
134 2)q
201
EMPLOYEES
35 EMPLOYEES
2322232L5230,??21-4
576
22'7
519188555209591564208]-73 565
584549593
929688808080
83 8880
80 2332333223
1 323
6 232
5 232324
3l_
2 3
4 2
1 3
108
5081
92 8062
t_8
5362386167
08 92
38 oa95
62ott_5
33487816896032L531115151
594
587
2]-0 59057'r2L]- 2062]-8 s86234
210
,057 ,054 ,10L
CUR AM? CUR HRS
2,908.00
99 100
BO8380
50 00000000
50 505000000000000000
0000000o
,099 .7L L1a, AA,822 ,44
,083 ,949 .39 .658,885 ,227 ,633 1trO,7L7 t76L 211
,350 ,486 ,985 ,820 ,658 )a9
0000000000
0000000000OO00000000
455
72L
20L657
l-51585l_572595324
18010870
96 80808080808188808080
80 8080
808080808080
PAGE TOTALS 2 ,9A8 ***FEATURE TOTALS * ra8 ,657 .96
31 PAY INFORMATTON
o/T T-L/2 03
FEATURE DISTRIBUTTON RUN- 3 /06/2024 12:05 :51
PR4B0R-Vl4 .23
PAGE 1
C]TY_O/T REPORT PAYROLL CI8 FY 23 /24- 02/rB rO 03l02 PAYDA CUR
406
338351
LQ 2024 Y A3/0e/24
AMT CUR HRS
Paymate
232223234
2L4
5'7 6
221
579s91
564594581 11 EMPLOYEES
44 93
801052
812Ia4
50 000050505000
000000
0000
EMP #
1:. EMPLOYEES
384
193
31 59r
880324
96 131
66 a476I1
T2
20I I2
L6I
23 B1
B pAGE TOTALS *** 99
FEATURE TOTALS * 4 ?1? nd 99.00
32 ...F F.BIWEEKLY
STUB CHECK REGISTER
PERToD 1 DATTNG 2/r8/zoz+-
DIRECT DEPOSIT IS TURNED ON
RUN- oz/ oa/zoz+ L2 -L3
PR311R-Vr .23
z/oz/zoz+ cHEcK DATE z/oa/zoz+
07 PAGE 1
PAYROLL... PaYmal-e
CHECK FORM
CHECK
NUMBER
L42368
L42369
L4237 0
L4231r
CHECK
AMOUNT
i ,-)o ?''l
Lt)Jr.JL
t,423 . 00
2 ,8t9 .45
r,993 " 5B
CODE
4052
4042
4 018
4022
CHECK
SEQ
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
TOTALS FOR CHECK FORM
NEGOTIABLE CHECKS
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
STUB
*EMPLOYEE C}IECKS
*VENDOR CHECKS
*BANK CHECKS
*XTOTAL NEGOTIABLE CHECKS
COUNTS
0 0
0 0
OTHER CHECKS
0.00 0.00
NON_NEGOTIABLE CHECKS
'7 ,57 5 .34
0.00 O. OO **TOTAL FOR CHECK FORM
*MANUAL CHECKS
*CANCELLED CHECKS
*DIRECT DEPOSIT
*VENDOR DIR DEP
0 0
STUBS
STUBS
4 0
33 PAY INFORMATION
GROSS PAY
FEATURE DIS TRIBUTIO
LL #18 LQ 2024
PAYDAY a3/AB/24
CUR AMT
N RUN- 3/06/2024 L2: o5:19
PR4B0R-V14.23
PAGE 1
FIRE_GROSS REPORT_ PAYRO Paymate FY 23/24- 02/re TO A3/O2 EMP #
4052
4O 424 0184022 4 EMPLOYEES
4 EMPLOYEES
CUR HRS
00 50
48 1513
1,900 'I q?,3,562 ) a)1
9,818
112.00112.00
80.00 112.00 PAGE TOTALS 415.00 ***
FEATURE TOTALS * o ot o tl 416.00
34 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/1,9/2024 r-5:
BANK VENDORBANK BANK OF THE SIERRA
000483000196000283000253
Check Register
CHECK#
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 1
DATE AMOIINT
195
997
15 0023030 015 21
002308
002310001_285 001875
ooL242001_875 00L254
00L264ooL264
00126400L242
001884001356
001-242
002303
402302
001936ooo9440 01114001913001-888000334
001966
.40306
000351_ 0009150009560010890013500 0174 800005400r_8360 0116 0000758 4n?n? 000646
000753001875
.40304
0 021-92
r4820 I482I1-4822r48231-4824L48251-4826
1-482'71 A OaOL4829148301-48311-483214833r483414835
L48361 4696'/ 4697'7 46987 469974100'7 47 0L
74102141037 47 04
7 4'7 0574'706747071410814109747L07 4'7 LL141L21 411-314114141]-51 411-67 471-7147L87 411-97 4'720'7 47 21- 7 47221 4723I 41247 47251 4126
ADVENTIST HEALTH PHY NET
MfERZWINSKI /MICHAL LA LASER CENTER PC
APRIA HEALTHCARE INC VISALIA FAMILY PRACTTCE E.D.I.S.
KAWEAH DELTA MEDICAL CEN E.D.r.S.
FAMILY HEALTH CARE NETWO
FAMILY HEALTH CARE NETWO
FAIVIILY HEALTH CARE NETWO
FAMILY HEALTH CARE NETWO
KAWEAH DELTA MEDICAL CEN
ADVANCED CARE MEDICAL GR VISALIA WOMENS SPECIALTY
KAWEAH DELTA MEDICAL CEN
ADVENT]ST HEALTH PHY NET A.R.E. AUTO PARTS INC
ADVENTIST HEALTH TOXICOL
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERVI AT & T MOBILITY
AUTOZONE STORE 4485
AVENU INSIGHTS & ANALYTT
BANK OF AMERICABANK OF THE SIERRA
BR]SENO/ FRANCISCO BSK ASSOCIATES
CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UN
CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UN
CA TURF EQUIPMENT & SUPP
CALIFORNIA CHOfCE
CALIFORNTA STATE
CECILS GARAGECISCO T]RESCOOKS COMMUNICATIONCREATIVE FORMS & CONCEPT
D'AMORE/MICHAELDEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE I
DEPARTMENT OF .fUSTICE E.D.I.S.ELIAS/AMALIA
ESO SOLUTIONS, INC EWING TRRIGAT]ON PRODUCT FOOTHILLS SUN_ GAZETTE/TH FRESNO CITY COLLEGE
FRESNO OXYGEN
FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY CO.
GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE
03/3-3-/24
03/11-/24
03/1-1-/24o3'/ 1-r'/ 24o3'/ 7L'/ 24 03/rr/24 03/rr/24 03/rr/24 03/Lr/24 o3/Lr/24 03/Lr/24 03/rL/24 03/1-r/24 03/1-1-/24o3'/ i-i-'/ 24
o3'/ ra'/ 24 03/Lr/24 03/re/24 03/L9/24 03/19/24 03/L9/24 03/\9/24o3'/ 1.9'/ 24o3'/ 1-9'/ 24o3'/ 1-9'/ 2403/1-9/24 o3/r9/24 03/19/24 03/Le/24 03/re/24 03/t9/24 o3'/L9'/ 24 a3/L9/24 03/19/24 03/L9/24
o3'/ Ls / 24
o i.'/ 1 s'/ 24
o3'/ a9'/ 24o3'/ re'/ 24 o3/\9/24o3'/ Le'/ 24 03/re/24 03/L9/24 03/1-9/24o3'/ re / 24 03/Le/24 03/Le/24 03/Le/24
00 69
000000
92 z5
00 15.00
189.17
15.00 552 .94 ) o)4 0n 62'7.32
1 LLq, LA
392.1-4
l_48. s0
2 ,643 .71 15,761_.80 150.00
56L.25 I
,
LL9 .68
48 12l_5 41153010
26 z5
45 38,565 65s
L,07 4 330
I ,226 439
100391
r,52'71-
,
L45t-00
2 ,056 356
278
15 1900
2U
00 )i
09550005
84 1- ,217
009L59
38 6300
z549
000000
nn
000290000898
299
93 586
2 ,1-1-8
AA
73 35
ACS F]NANC 03/re/2024
BANK
004923002255
IAL SYSTEM
15:
BANK BANK OF THE S]ERRA
QO1123 GRISWOLD. LASALLE, COBB, 001343 HEALTH WISE SERVICES Check Register
CHECK#
747351 4136
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.2]. PAGE 2
VENDOR DATE AMOUNT
H]GH SIERRA AG INC IBARRA SR/FELIPE
INTERWEST CONSULTING GRO
KS ELECTRICL]NGUISTICA INTERPRETING MEDALLION SUPPLY
MENDOZA/RUDYNORCAL OUTDOOR SUPPLY CO
NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS
OFFICE DEPOT
PACE SUPPLY CORPPAPE MACHINERYPEDREGAL BUILDING MATERIPENA/ELISA PORTERV]LLE ASPHALT
QUAD _ KNOPF QUADIENT LEASING USA INC
RODR]GUEZ /BLANCARODRf GUEZ,/LORENZO SELF HELP ENTERPRISES IN SILVAS O]L COMPANY INC SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO
SOUTHERN TIRE MARTST JOHN'S RIVER
STILLWELL/DAVIDSTOPSTICK LTD
SUPERIOR POOL PRODUCTS L
TAYLOR GROUP ARCHITECTSTELSTAR INSTRUMENTS INC.
TRUCK VAULT
UBEO WEST LLCUSA BLUE BOOKWOODLAKE GROWERS SUPPLY
WOODLAKE HARDWARE CO
WOODLAKE PLUMBING
BANK OF THE SIERRA
00168
00232
oo232
7 891575
859
4 5063
000014007801
t6
31 88o4
003138
L6
40 00
92I9
0579
375
6 ,904 4,r42
L ,282 62 ,676 766
3,745 3,5'75
L ,668
) )91
3- ,29r
1412'77 47287 4729'7 4730
t 47 31-7 47321 473374734
7 47377 47387 4739
747401474L
4'7 4841 4941 50
47 51-
47 52
47 534'7 5441 5547 5647 5747 58
03/Le/2403/1-e/24 03/19/24 03/19/24 03/L9/24 03/L9/24 03/re/24 03/19/24 03/79/24 03/a9/24 03/Le/24 03/Le/24 03/19/24 03/79/24 03/19/24 03/re/24
03/1"e/24 03/L9/24 03/19/24o3'/ 1,s'/ 24 03/a9/24 03/1-9/24 03/19/24 03/L9/24 03/re/24 03/19/24 03/19/24 03/re/24 o3/te/24 03/a9/24 03/Le/24 03/L9/24 03/19/24 03/79/24 03/L9/24 o3'/ 19 / 24 o3/re/24
L ,1-47 L45
81_ 0 600 2,802 448
987534
I ,043 6,675
1_ ,403 551
7 386
2,48L 498
581
53 ,'7 58 518
30 74
I ,260 ) A'7 Q
2L,899
533
000s900103
00220
.40305
001970oooo22001963
.40301
.40302
000023
00L7 44
000024o0227 5
59 20
CA96
383929z5
1670509L05
'7 41 42
7414374744'7 47 4574146'7 47 47
0 018100003
00206
0016700200
001600010900233
001800015900098
5805
9897
6 180
7'7
1777'77'7
00L7 6 700228
001_l_4 0000200002
001_02
741597 4"7 60
7 47 61-
'7 41 62
74763
27 00
281, 501. 15 ***
36 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/L9/2024 15:
BANK VENDOR
REPORT TOTALS:
Check Register
CHECK#
RECORDS PRINTED - OOO598
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_VOB.21 PAGE 3
DATE AMOUNT
281, 501 . 15
37 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03 / 19 / 2024 1-5 : 42 :27
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
A.R.E. AUTO PARTS INC
wD40 03 /2024
socKET irrcH o: /2024LENS REPL 03 / 2,024 ATM-10 FUSE 03/2024 FUEL F]L/SHOP TWLS BEAM WfPER BLADE 03
NAPA OIL FILTER 03l
FLEET FRNT BRK PDS
HYD HOSE FTTNG O3l2
ADVANCED CARE MEDICAL GR
SERVTCES 03/2024
Schedul-e of Bills
AMOITNT ACCOUNT NAME
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
SPECTAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN VEH]CLE MAINTENANCE/OPER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER
SPECTAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN *VENDOR TOTAL
45.00 HEALTH INSURANCE
20I7
50352L
24 1-9 a2
40 94
0 418
0 418046204180424o4620 4110 41-1-0462
060060060060050060
029
nro
032
029
029029o32032029
8 215 01821565
82157I821-854822054822L9882221-8t322236822269
165155165155l-55r-65L65l_65165
001500 0151
00r52
001_53 00154
00155001-560015700i_s8
060060060
64 39
518939
FUND & ACCOUNT
001.0411.050.008
CLAIM INVOICE
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 1
PO# F/P ID LTNE
194 00014
0429
04060460
0412 044r
0402
001001062001001o62001001062
001060072 04r001
0010 01_0010 01_001061062
3823
87 258
552
1/ z+ /)L
2024
3/24024
ADVENTIST
SERVICESSERVICESSERVICES
SERVICESSERVICESSERVTCESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICES SERV]CESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICES
DR VISTT
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHI{EALTI{HEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTH
]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCE INSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCE
HEAL
03/03/ 03/
03/03/
TH PHY NET
2024202420242024
20242024202420242024202420242024
20242024202420242024202420242024202420242024
202420242024202420242024202420242024
202420242024
0403
Q404
0405
0 415
04L6
0418
o42L
o4220 461-046204630 41-2
00017
0001700017000170001700017000170001_7000r_7000r_70001_7 00017 0001700017000170001700017
4424
3 10
32 l-11851
0 2
5 00010000000
00 64
0000
b/
6302'71
21_
84557456
34I122
5t87
001
0010010 01_0 01-00r_ 001001061u6z063
001029
0403
0404
0405
041_5 04L60418o421-o4220 461-0462
046304L2
194L94
L94L94a941-94]-941-9 4
L94L941-941941-941-9 4
0000100001-0000100001
000010000100001-00001
00001
00001_ 00001
000010000100001
0s00s0
0s00s0
008008008008
008008008008008008
008008000000
000000008
008008008008008008008
008008008
0s00500s0
0500500500500s00s0
0s00500500s0050
03 /. 03/o3'/.03/ 03/o3'/
03/
o3'/03 /.03 /. 03/ 03/
o3'/ 03/ 03/ 03/ 03/
o3'/o3'/o3'/ 03/03 /. 03/
03/ 03/
o3'/
03/
03/ 03/
o3'/
59 015479
3535
15 3624
83 27
2L
8802
39 B88
888
00001000010000100001
l-94L94l.941-9 4
DR VISITDR VISIT
DR VISITDR VISITDR V]SIT DR VfSITDR VIS]T DR VISITDR VISITDR VfSITDR VISITDR VISIT DR VISITDR VISITDR VIS]T DR VISIT
001
001001
050050050050050
050
008008008008008008
]-94 L94
1-941-94194]-94 50 ]-94
50505050
0l1-9
04 063
0010290010600 41-
0429
0405045 0
000
000
00000000
000
]-94 1dA
L94
1-9 4
L947947947941-9 4
0.04 1-9 4
0412o44r
38 ACS F]NANCIAL SYSTEM
03 / L9 / 2024 75 :42 :27
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTTON
ADVENTIST HEALTH PHY NET
DR VrSfr 03/2024
ADVENTIST HEALTH TOX]COL
TOXTCOLOGY REPORT 3/24
AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV] UNIFORM SERV]CE UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICEUNIFORM SERVfCE
APRIA HEALTHCARE INC
Schedule of Bi11s
AIVIOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
HEALTH INSURANCE *VENDOR TOTAL
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *VENDOR TOTAL
0 0 1 . 0 4 0 2 . 0 5 0 . 0 0 8
2 ,024 .O0 CONTRACTURAL SERVTCES 001_ . 041_1, . 050 . 028 o.22 2r0.15
FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE
21_65
CTTY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 2
PO# F/P ]D LINE
l-94 00017165 00058
001001 oAt
063001061
062063001029001060001001001
0010 01_ 00tt_5 1-4 50L779bt 876t 8535
238
19 289
79 6Z /
0010000
48 03 / 202403 / 2024o3'/ 202403/24
3 /243'/243 /243'/24 3/243'/24 3/24 3/24
3/24 3/243/243/243/243/24 3/24 3/24 3/243'/24
3 /24 3/24
3'/ 243/24 3/243/243/243 /24 3/24 3/24a, /)a a'/ta
3 / 2024
I614
67 81
32 041-00 4180462
0463
060050050050
029011011011
FEBRUARY 2024FEBRUARY 2024
FEBRUARY 2024FEBRUARY 2024
16516516s
16s
00225
0022600221
00228
16sl_65 165l-65
MEDICALMED]CALMEDTCALMED]CAL MEDICALMEDICALMEDfCAL
MEDTCALMEDICALMEDICALMEDICALMEDICALMEDICALMEDICALMED]CAL MEDlCALMEDTCAL
MEDTCAL
EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT
HEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH HEALTH *VENDOR
fNSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCE TOTAL
EQU] EQUIEQUIEQUIEQUIEQUIEQU] EQUI
PMENTPMENTPMENTPMENTPMENTPMENTPMENTPMENT
EQUIPMENTEQUIPMENTEQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENTEQUIPMENTEQUIPMENTEQU]PMENTEQU]PMENT
110l02
00 2
79T4
001-.0403001.0404001.0405001.041_5001-.041_6 001.041_8 001.0421 0500500500500500500500s0050050050050
3-941-9 4]-94 ]_941-9 4
1-9 4l AAL94
0000400004000040000400004000040000400004
7941-94794194
00004000040000400004000040000400004
t20563
44 L401135220
0422
046L
0462
0463
0 41-2
042904060460
0472
044L
0402
008008
008008008008008008008008008008008008008008
008008
L94l-9410Al-941-9 41-9 4
t_55 L65165165165165165
020
020
020020020
50505050
00023
00023000230002300023
000230002300023
00023
00023
00023
0002300024
060060060060060060060060
060060060060060
0000400004
00004
000
0 AT & T MOB]LITY CfTY CELL PHONES CITY CELL PHONES CITY CELL PHONES CITY CELL PHONES CITY CELL PHONES CITY CELL PHONES CITY CELL PHONES CITY CELL PHONES CITY CELL PHONES
CTTY CELL PHONES CITY CELL PHONES CITY CELL PHONES
PD CELL PHONES O
zz. ta
15.18 45.56
7 .59
l_5. l_8 37 -96 a) 1a
45.56 0.07
26r .9L26L .98
686.11
r
,
445 .49
020020020020
020
020o20
020
012
04r
001
0s0050
0403
0404
04050 415
TELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONE
TELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONE *VENDOR TOTAL 001001061o62
o62
063001
o4L60 418
042L
0422 046r0462
165165
0462
0463
0411
39 1^C
03/
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
F]NANCIAL SYSTEM L9/2024 :-5:42:27 Schedule of Bi11s
A]VIOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO]- SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1 *VENDOR TOTAL
HOUSEHOLD FIRE STATION
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER
OFFTCE SUPPLIES FIRE STATION MAINTENANC
HOUSEHOLD FIRE STATION
OFFICE SUPPLIESOFFICE SUPPLIESOFFICE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER UTILITIES FIRE STATION MATNTENANC
HOUSEHOLD FIRE STATIONTRAINING EXPENSE
HOUSEHOLD FIRE STATION FIRE GEAR
HOUSEHOLD FIRE STATTON
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN *VENDOR TOTAL
FUND & ACCOUNT
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_VO8 .21 PAGE 3
CLATM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
44859l-844859234485928
INVB-051963
AUTOZONE STORE 4485
SUPPLIES 03/2024
ATR FILTER,/1]YBRID 03 / 24 SUPPL]ES 03/2024
293 .48
54 .90
43.76 392.L4
0418041_ 80 418
060060050
n?g
029029nr?nr?
032 o2t
957
806
086
165165165
0 0110 0110006
I
q
1 AVENU INS]GHTS & ANALYT] CASS CERTIFICATION 3/24
BANK OF AMERfCA
HH FIRE STATION 03/2024
vEHrcLE MATNT. 03/2024
OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/2024
FIRE STN MAINT 03/24
HH FIRE STATN 03/2024
OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/24OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/24oFFrcE SUPPLTES 03/24 VEHICLE MAINT 03/2024UTTLTTTES 03/2024 FIRE STN MAINT 03/24 HH F]RE STN 03/2024 TRATNTNG 03/2024HH FIRE STN 03 /2024 FIRE GEAR 03/2024 HH FIRE STN 03/2024
SPECL DEPT EXPNSE 03/24
BANK OF THE STERRA
AMAZONAMAZONAMAZONADOBEAMAZON
2024
/ 2024
PLAN
/2024 2024/ 2024
03/24
148.50 SPECTAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1. 0410 .060.O29 l_55 00090
39.17 975.33
56 .82
43 .49
5.86 1-1-9 .40
66.00 1 Ad
526 .0L
81.99 L] .72 1-30.19
1-L2 .30
6 .47
390.00
51- .1-7
1-9.16
AL1 '7'7
004004004004004004004004004004004004004
004004004004
04L404L404],4 04L404I404L4
o41-404'J.4
04l-4
o4t40 41-40 41-4o 41-40 41-40 41-4
04L404]-4
060060060
060060060050060060060
016
032023034
016
023
060060060060050060060
034
0r-6o3'7016058016
029
00070
00071
00072
00073
0007 4
00075000750007700078000790008000081
0008200083000840008s00086
16sl-6 51-6516516516516516s1-65165165
l_55t_65l_55t-6516516s
2 030303
03/
03 /2024 '/2024
/ 2024
L73L79515
1_2 10A
o
z /5
1_9 7l-4L6
1-7 6
1_9
108
042t042L047L04770402
0 410 042r
o402
o 421-0 410o 421, 0402
04110462055004l- 0
0402
0402 042r0 4180422
060050060060060060060060060060060060060
050080nAn060060060060060
042
029029
029
029
o23
042
029074o23
o74
o29
029029
538
028029029
o42
029029
1-6516516sL65
r-65L65165155165165l_651_5 516516516s165L6516s16s16516s 00230
0023L00232
00233
00234
0023s
0023600237
002380023 9
o0240 0024ro0242
00243
00244
00245
o024600247
o0248
0024900250
9899
56 99
66 9954
99 92
PARKS AND REC EXPENSES
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PARKS AND REC EXPENSES
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
WOODLAKE STUDIO
OFFICE SUPPL]ES WOODLAKE STUDIO
SPECTAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSTORMWATER PROJECTCONTRACTURAL SERVfCESSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
PARKS AND REC EXPENSES
SPECTAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
SPEC]AL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
001001001001001001001001001001
0010 01_001o620010 01-00100r_ 001001001
DRf CRSH
AMAZON OADOBE 03AMAZON O
3 3
EARTHLTNK 03/2024
AMAZON 03/2024ADOBE 03/2024
AMAZON 03/2024
TWILTO 03/2024
PLAT]PUS ANCHORS ADOBE 03/2024 CITY OF WOODLAKE 03 /24 03/24 90 25
oo
25 31
0098
AMAZON 03/2024AMAZON 03/2024
LOWES 03/2024
GRAFFITI SOLUTIONS 03/24
00l404
43 13
10 6 ,5]-584
1 2L
423
215
1_ ,29]-
40 ACS FINANC 03/19/2024 IAL SYSTEM 1-5 :42:2'7 Schedule of Bi1ls A]VIOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
GREENWOOD PARKGREENWOOD PARKWOODLAKE STUDIO
SPEC]AL DEPARTMENT EXPEN SPECfAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
BASKETBALL EXPENSES
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
TRAVEL, CONFERENCES & ME SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
BASEBALL/SOFTBALL EXP
BASEBALL/SOFTBALL EXP
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICES TRA]NING EXPENSE TRAINING EXPENSE
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECTAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECTAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN *VENDOR TOTAL
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-VO8 .21 PAGE 4
CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ]D LINE
659 N.CYPRESS
MARCH 2024
62568L
625682
625684625685
VENDOR NAIVIE
DESCR]PTION FUND & ACCOUNT
BANK OF THE SIERRA
AIVTAZON 03/2024
LOWES 03/2024LOWES 03/2024
HAJOCA VIS PIPE O3l
WDLK DRIVE ]N O3l20 WC SND & GRVL 03/24
CRWN AWARDS 03/2024 sPorrFY 03/2024 EB 2024 SPRNG PLCYoFFrcE DEPOT 03/24MOTTON PTCTURES 03/24 vfsuAl ]-NK 03/2024 SP INLND EMPIRE 03/24 ADOBE 03/2024
l-877 FOR PARTS 03/2024
SMART & FINAL 03/2024 IN ARRWHD SCIENTFC 3/24
TROY PRODUCTS 03/2024
PARTS GEEK 03/2024 rNT'L CODE COUNCTL 3/24 INT'L CODE COUNCAL 3/24 TULARE COUNTY 03/2024TULARE COUNTY 03/2024 srG SAUER 03/2024 t64
1-2
434
56 197
1819
30521_3
21-2L
75 L5 ,7 61-
155
o1 A
372)aq.
16 150745
10 aaE
l_0 44
89 aa
96o26Z
99 00l-3
95 2232
99 950900510015
o620010010 01_062
00100r0 01-001ubzo62
0462
o407o407042]- 0462
042]-
0 421-040304 0104620462
042]- 042r
0 4150 410
0411O4LL04 i_ t_0 4110 4150 415
04020402
O LL
o)q
543543074
029 ntoo44
165l_65 165165l_65
1_55165r65l-6516516s
L651651_55
24 3 /24
060080080060060060
00251oo25200253
00254
00255
00260
0026r0026200263
00256
00251
002s8
o0259
'7n,
489
212
o29030
029029045
045
029
o29
o28
028
060060
060060050060060060060060060
060060060060
0 4180462 042r
0 421-
0101
01010101_
001062
0 01_ 001
5050I9
80 23920L
L20
5 51-
00 0000
o026
0026
0026
002600260026
002'70021
0005900058000600 011_ 0
16s1651651-65165165
16s
1-65165165r-65
165165l_65
4 67
8901
0 01_0 01_
0010 01-001001001
028028031
037
029029029
060
060050
l_65 165165
00212
00273
0027 6
BRISENO/FRANCISCO
WTR DEP RFND O3l24
BSK ASSOCIATES
BACT] 03/2024 WEEKLY EFFLUENT 03/24WEEKLY EFFLUENT 03/2024
CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UN
EMPLEE W/HLDGS 03/24
CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UN
EMPLEE W/HLDNGS 3/2024
CA TURF EQUIPMENT & SUPP
GENERATOR TNSPCTN 3/24
FUEL FLTR GNRTR 03/24
SPREDER 03/2024
cYC OIL/STRK OrL 3/24
]-5O. OO UTII,TTY DEPOSITS 001.0000 .200.034 L65 00274
50z550atr
95.00 ao? 2T749.99L39.6L
r ,27'7 .9L
053062062
0453
0462o462
CONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVTCES *VENDOR TOTAL SPEC]AL DEPARTMENT SPECIAL DEPARTMENT
SPECIAL DEPARTMENTSPECIAL DEPARTMENT *VENDOR TOTAL
028028028029
029029
050060050
060050060060
56 01
561-9
6l_ 51
AHOAHOAHO
0011-40 0115001-49
7,1,79 .68 GARNTSHMENT OF WAGES WrT 001.0000.200.033
84.00 GARNTSHMENT OF WAGES WIT OOJ.. OOOO.2OO. O33
MARCH 2024 165 00093
165 00091
EXPEN
EXPENEXPENEXPEN
41 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03 /19 /2024 L5:42:27
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CALIFORNIA CHOICE cfTY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 crTY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 CITY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 crTY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 cfrY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 crTY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 CITY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 crTY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 crrY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 crrY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 crTY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 crTY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 crTY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 CITY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 crTY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 C]TY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 cfrY EMPLOYEES 03/2024 CITY EMPLOYEES O3 /2024 CTY IN W/HLD EMPLEE 3/24
PD EXPENSE 03/2024
FIRE EXPENSE 03/2024FD INS W/H EMPLEE 03/24
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08,21 PAGE 5
AMOUNT
Schedule of Bills
ACCOUNT NAIVIE FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM ]NVOICE PO# F/P ID L]NE r ,1-63 381
294
1- ,240 I ,40r 6,a30
23 2 t5
629
63 o
58 3,300 r0 ,249 3,152 337
38,56s
20242024
20242024202420242024
202420242024
20242U 242U 242024
20242024
001
0010 01_0010 01_
0 61_062063
0402
0403
0404
04050 4150 41-6
041_ 8 042L04220 461-
0462
046304r2
00035
0003600036000360003600036
00036000350003600036
L84.20500.83
496 -672L7 .22
5LL .82 345.15
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTH
HEALTH
HEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
*VENDOR
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCE]NSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCE
INSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCE
INSURANCE]NSURANCE
AUlA!
APRILAPRIL
APRILAPRILAPRILAPRIL
APRTLAPRILAPRfLAPRIL
APRILAPRILAPRILAPRILAPR]L APR]L APRIL
APRIL
APRILAPRlLAPRILAPRIL
l-050
46 4149
89a)78
49 74
0429
0406
0460
001
001001001
001029
0010600120 41-
050050
008008008 00036 00036
00036000360003600036
000350003500037
000380003900040
I6
1,61-61-6L6L6
1516
1-65165165
155165
t-65165165
2024202420242024
20242024
008008008
008008008008008
008
008008008008
008008031008
008031
050050050
050050050050
050050
0500500500s0050
050050200
050050
200
165
t-55165
l_65 165
L65
49I9
00 0311_o459
001001004004
o4t2 044r
000004t-10 41-40000
W]THHELWITHHEL
CALIFORNIA STATE
EMPLEE W/HLDNGS 03/24
CECILS GARAGE
RESET PRKNG BRAKE OIL CHNGE,/FLTR 03
CISCO TIRES
FLAT REPAIR SERVICE 3/24
COOKS COMMUNICATION
RADIO GRANT 03/2024
CREATIVE FORMS & CONCEPT BL CERTIFICATES 03/24
D'AMORE/MICHAEL
CLEANING DEP RFND 3/24
555.38 GARNTSHMENT OF WAGES WfT 001.0000.200.033
3 /24 /24 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER OO1 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER OO1 *VENDOR TOTAL 041_t_.0 041_1.0 60.032 0L7 049 30 o1-'t 21-6 MARCH 2024
l-502
l-56506
t_20511
P&R 24-009
APRILAPRILAPRILAPRIL
APRIL
165 00092
l-55 00133 165 00069 50.00 L
,
024 .63
1, ,0'7 4 .63
330.00
8,226.25
439 .49
1_00.00
77 7350
90 CONTRACTURAL SERVICES 062.O462. O6O. O28RADIO & PAGER MAINTENANC 0O4.0474.060.033 SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1. O4O2 .O6O.029
DEPOSITS FORM OTHERS OO]-. OOOO.2OO. O35
l-65165
165
l_6 5
0012500087
00045
0004900280
00280
DEARBORN NATIONAL CITY EMPLOYEES CITY EMPLOYEES CITY EMPLOYEES CITY EMPLOYEES CITY EMPLOYEES L
030303
0303
IFE I
/ 2024/ 2024/ 2024
/ 2024/ 2024
552
53 HEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTH
INSURANCE
INSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCE
002800028000280
008
008008008008
050
0500s0050050
0405
0 415
04L6
001001001
0 01_ 001
0403
0404
202420242024
20242024
165l-65165l_65
98 1-65
42 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03 / L9 / 2024 15 :42:27
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
DEARBORN NATIONAL CITY EMPLOYEES O CITY EMPLOYEES O CITY EMPLOYEES O C]TY EMPLOYEES O CITY EMPLOYEES O CITY EMPLOYEES O CfTY EMPLOYEES O CITY EMPLOYEES O CTTY EMPLOYEES O C]TY EMPLOYEES O CITY EMPLOYEES O CITY EMPLOYEES O CITY EMPLOYEES O
POLICE EMPLOYEES
DEPARTMENT OF JUS'] FINGERPRINT APP
AMOUNT
Schedu]e of Bi11s
ACCOTINT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_VOB.21 PAGE 6
CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
APRfLAPRfLAPRILAPRIL
APRILAPRILAPRILAPRILAPRILAPRIL
APRILAPRILAPRTLAPRIL
71-9067
L] 3/ 3/ 3/ 3/ 1/
3'/ 3/
3'/ 3/ 3/ 3/ 3/3'/
0 FEI202420242024
20242024202420242024
202420242024202420243 /24
063001
029
001060o720 41-001001
041_8 042ro422
0 461-0462
0463041-20429
040 6
0460o412
04410402
0 411
202420242024202420242024
20242024202420242024202420242024
l_3
4 3 t4
96 70
0 3
10 00
2 L49 39r
0 0t_1010)
00 2
1913
0 9574
21 18
26't3
09 l-651651_65
1_65165165765165
001001
0010 61_o62
42 4039
31 612-J.50
00313t_
13322L
7331
8701
1-6'7865
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH *VENDOR
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
INSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCETNSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
TOTAL
]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE INSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCE INSURANCE]NSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
0500500s0050050
0s0050
008008008008
008008008008
00280
00280
00280
000060000600006
000060000600006
1-6516516516516s
16s
l-94]-94 1941-9 4
L94L941-94
0500s0050
050050050050
008
008008008008008008
008008008
008008008008008008
008008008008008008008
008
0500s0050050050
0500500500500500s00s0
0500500s0050
0028000280
0028000280002800028000280
00280002800028000281
000060000600008000080000800008000080000800008
ICE03 /24 T,527.00 CONTRACTURAL SERVICES 001.0411.060.028 165 00067 E D.I
RX
RXRXRXRXRXRXRX
RXRXRXRXRXRX
RX
RX
RXRXRXRXRXRX
RXRXRXRXRXRX
RXRX
e
INWOICE
INWOICEINWOICEINWOICEINWOICEINWO]CE INWOf CE
INWOf CEINWOICEINWOICEINWOICE INWOl INWOI
INWOIINWOfINWOIINWOI
001
00100100r00100r_ 001
0010 51_ ubz
029
0 01_060
072
0101
0101
LT
CECECELECE
03 / 2O24
03 / 202403 / 2024o3'/ 202403 / 2024o3'/ 202403 / 2024
03 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 202401 / 2024o3'/ 2024 03 / 202403 / 2024 03/24
o3'/ 24
03/2403/24
03/24 03/24o3'/ 2403'/ 24o3'/ 2403/2403/24
03/24
0000
0000053
0000
0403
o40404050415
0416
0 418o 421- i4t)
o46]- 04620463 04r20429
0406
0460
o472
0 441-
0402
0403
050050050
0s00500500500500500s0
0500s0
008008008
008008008008008008008008
008
1-9 41,9 41,9 4
3-94194l-941-9 4]-94 ].94
1-9 4194
000060000600006
000050000600006
0000600006
24 1818
1-7
39 04032L
L413
z-Q
0630 01-
00006
1-9 4 00006
1dA
III
III
NWOINVOICENVOICENVOICENVOfCENVOICE
INVOICETNVOICEINVOICEfNVOICE
INVOICE]NVOICE ]NVOICE
04L
0 01_00100
00 0404
0405
86 67
82I4
97 05
0 01_0010010 61_062
0530 01_
0 415
o4L6
041_ 8 042L0422 046r0462
o463
04L2
1-9 4l-941-9 4
l-94L941941-94L941,9 41-9 4
0500s0
0000800008000080000800008
43 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03 / 19 / 2024 L5 : 42 :27
VENDOR NAME
DESCRTPTION
E.D.I.S
Schedule of Bills CITY OF WOODLAKE GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 1 AMOT]NT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLATM INVOICE PO# F/P ID L]NE RX TNVOTCE 03/24
RX INVOICE 03/24RX INVOICE 03/24RX TNVOTCE O3'/ 24
RX TNVOTCE 03/24
RX TNVOTCE 03/24
EMPLYEES & RTREESEMPLYEES & RTREESEMPLYEES & RTREESEMPLYEES & RTREESEMPLYEES & RTREESEMPLYEES & RTREES
EMPLYEES & RTREES
EMPLYEES & RTREESEMPLYEES & RTREESEMPLYEES & RTREESEMPLYEES & RTREES
EMPLYEES & RTREES
EMPLYEES & RTREESEMPLYEES & RTREESEMPLYEES & RTREESEMPLYEES & RTREESEMPLYEES & RTREES
EMPLYEES & RTREES
POLTCE EXPENSE 03,/ FIRE DEPT 03/2024
ADMrN 03/2024ADMIN 03/2024
ADMTN 03 /2024
ADMrN O3'/2024ADMIN 03/2024
ADMrN O3'/2024ADMTN 03/2024ADMIN O3'/2024ADM]N 03/2024 ADMrN 03/2024ADM]N 03/2024 ADMIN 03/2024ADMrN 03/2024 ADMIN 03/2024ADMrN 03/2024ADMTN 03/2024ADMrN 03/2024ADMTN 03/2024 01000
05 1515
0429o40 6
0 46004'72o44L
04020402
0s0050050050
050050
008008008008008
008
bz43
1-40113
5013
31 186465
5556
66 00
9393
49 13
4325
94 nrg0 01-060012 04r001001
0010010010010 01-001001
00105r001
004
0010 01_0 01_0 01_0 01_001
00r001
25 7700
31 5959
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHI{EALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTH *VENDOR
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCEINSURANCE
]NSURANCE INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCE
TOTAL
APRILAPR]L APRIL
APRILAPRILAPRILAPRILAPRILAPRILAPRIL
APRILAPRILAPRI], APRILAPRILAPR]L APRIL
APRILAPRILAPRILAPRILAPRTL
APRILAPRILAPRILAPRILAPRILAPRILAPR]L APRIL
APR]L APRTLAPRILAPRfLAPR]L APRIL
APRILAPRIL
000080000800008000030000300003
00003
L94 00008
0000800008
1-94!94l-94l-94
3/243/243/243'/24
3/24 3/24 3/24 3/24 3/24 3/24 3/243'/24
1. /ra"i't zq 3/24 3/24 3/24 3/2424
o5
051
o
'76
108
o
1 0
t_2
800
00001001
010000
005
lL
3 13
2a
l_8
1 o62063001
029
001060o'7 )0 41_
l-94165
165l-5516s165165
0403
0404
040504150422
0 451-
o462
1,616L6L6L6
Ib
04]-6
0 418
o42]-
20242U 242024202420242024
2024
2024
2024202420242024
20242024202420242024202420242024
202420242024202420242024
2024202420242024202420242024
20242024202420242024
165165165l-65
1_6s
008008008008008
008008008008008008
008008008008008
008008008008008008008
008008008008008008008008
050050050
0500500500500500500s0
050
0s00s00s00500500s0050
0500500500500s0050
0s0050
00003000030000300003000030000300003
00003000030000300003
00006
0000600006000060000600006
000060000600006
16s
165r-65165165l_65 165
i-65165
35 1-2
)q614I38
AF
35 48
032)o2
3Z
75 0'7
010693
0463041-20429
0406
0460
0472 o44t0 4110 41-4
0402
0403
o404
04050 415
04l-6
0 4180 421-
0422
046L
0462
046304r20429
0406
046 00472 044r
050050050050050
0500500500500s00s0
050
008008008008008008008
165165165165
1651651651651651651-65165
00003
000030000300004000050000600006
00006000060000600006000050000600005
063001
029
0 01_
0 01_061062
060012
o47
t ,20
ELIAS/AMALIA
CLEANING DEP REFND 3/24 1OO. OO DEPOSITS FORM OTHERS 0 0 r_ . 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 0 . 0 3 5 P&R 24-013 165 00050 44 ACS F]NANCIAL SYSTEM
03 / 19 / 2024 !5 : 42 :27
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
FAMTLY HEALTH CARE NETWO
ESO SOLUT]ONS, INC RECORDS MANG 03/2024
EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCT
HUNTER ULTRA 03/2024
PVC/STEEL COUPLING 3/24 SPEC]AL DEPARTMENT EXPEN SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN *VENDOR TOTAL Schedule of Bills
A}4OLINT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT
2,056 .20 CONTRACTURAL SERVICES O04 .0414.060.028
CLATM ]NVOICE
L3448L
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 8
PO# F/P ID LINE
165 00088
0010800109
a2 t171-
356
76O 7CR09
165165
0 01-063
042Lo463
060.029
060.029 2l-'7].556'7 2L'1L5650
DR VISITDR VISITDR VISITDR VfSTT
DR VISITDR VISITDR VTSITDR VfS]T DR VIS]T DR VfSITDR VISfTDR VISIT
DR VISITDR VISITDR VISITDR VISITDR VISITDR VISIT
03/
03/03/ 03/
03/
03/ 03/o3'/.
03/
03/
0403
0404
04050 415
04]-6
0 418
0424
0422o46\0462
0463
008008008008008008008008
008008
2024202420242024
2024
2024
2024202420242024
000000
000
6 4
00 00
3535
153683
272I
8802
39 42
'17
041803
39 90
0901
08 HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHI{EALTI]HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTl]
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
UEAT NU
INSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCE INSURANCE]NSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCEfNSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCE]NSURANCE
INSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCE
fNSURANCE
]NSURANCE INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCElNSURANCE t941-941-9 4
000090000900009
L941-9 41-9 4
001001001
001001001001001051062
0 01_
029
00r_0500720 41_ 0010 01-001
0 01_0 01_0 01_ 001
0500500s0050050
SERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERV]CES
SERVICESSERVfCESSERVlCESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICES
SERVICES
03 / 2024
o3'/ 2024
03 / 202403 / 202403 / 2024o3'/ 2024
o3'/ 202403 / 2024
03 / 2024o3'/ 202403 / 2024o3'/ 2024o3'/ 2O2403 / 2024
03 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 2024o3 /2024o3'/ 202403 / 2024o3'/ 2024 00r_ 001001
0s00s0
01L9
45 o4
063001
029
001060072
04r2
04290405
0460
]-94 L94
L941941941-9 4
L941-9 4
1-9 41-9 4194
104L941-94194
008008008008
008008008008008008
008
008008008008008008008
050050
0500s00s00500s0050
0500s00500s00s0050
050
0s0050050050
0500s00500500500s00s00500s0
000090000900009
0000900009000090000900009000090000900009
00009000090000000000010001
0001_ 0001000100010001
0000
0001001
T2
800000
0000000
0 04
22 '7 1-71-31
I3
49 btt54
0505050505
041001001001
001001001
0472 044r
0402
0403
0404
04050 415o416
04L8042L
0422
046L
o462
0463 04r20429
0 406
0450
04'72
044L0402
0403
0404
04050 415
0416
0418
008008008008008008008
008008008008008008008
1-941-9 4
104
104
L94L94194l-941-9 41-9 41-9 4
L94L941941-941,9 4]-94 l-94
L94]-941,94
00010
00010000100001-0000100001_0 00010
00010000100001-00001_00001-l_0001_t_0001_10 0 011-
00011000t_1
00000
99000
0000
0 61-062063
050050
SERVICES 03/2024 qFD\/Tf-Erq
^'1'/
t At a
;Eii+iE;E oi't5o5i SERVTCES 03/2024
ROUTINE SERVICEROUTINE SERVICEROUTINE SERVfCEROUTINE SERVICE
ROUTINE SERVICEROUTINE SERVICE
03/24o3'/ 24
03/24
o3'/ 24 03/24
03'/24
342323
10L655
45 ACS FTNANCIAL SYSTEM
03 / 19 / 2024 15 : 42 :2'7
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
FAMILY HEALTH CARE NETWO
ROUTINEROUTINEROUTfNEROUTINEROUTINEROUTINE
ROUT]NEROUTINEROUTINEROUTINEROUTINE
ROUTINE
SERVICESSERVICESSERV]CES SERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVfCES SERVICESSERVTCESSERVICESSERVICESSERVICESSERVfCESSERVICESSERVICES SERVICESSERV]CES
2024
2024
Schedule of B1l-1s
FUND & ACCOUNT CLA]M ]NVOICE
278495C9 - 0063
180318370063333484
9243729L
9243134892431349
9243'7 3'7 4
92437 47 992438221-
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 9
PO# F/P ID LINE
000120001200012
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
S ERVICE
e
sSS
ERVICEERVlCEERVICEERVICE
SERVICESERVICESERVICE
SERVICESERVICESERVICESERVICE
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTH *VENDOR
INSURANCE
INSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCE
INSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCE INSURANCE]NSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE TOTAL
2U 242024202420242024202420242024
2024
021-664632'l654449
3759
808803
35 800801o'733
92 o404
0405 o4I5
04!6
041-80 421-0422
046L
0462
0463041-2
0.18 0.t4n qq
4 .01-z. >z
0.010.13
0.300.03
001001061
062063001o29001060012
0 41-
042L n4)) o46r
0462
0463
0 41-20429
04060460
0472o 441-
0500500s00500s0050
0s00s00500500500500500s0
050
008
008008008008008008008
008008008008008008008
008
794].94 ]-94 L94
104
L941941-941941-9 4l-94
L94L941dAL94
0001_l_0 0 011_ 00011000110 0 011_ 00011
0001100011000110 0 01r_0 0 011_ 000110001200012
03 /24o3'/ 24 03/2403/24 03/24
o3'/ 2403/2403/24 o3/24o3'/ 2403/24o3'/ 24
0000
0001001
10 70000000
8l0429 o406 0460 0472 o44r o402
0 01-0010 01-0010010010 01_
001
0 01-001
0 01-0620530 01"
o402
03/ 0403
03/
03 /. 03/o3'/o3'/
03/
03/
03/o3'/
03/ 03/ 03/ 03/
03/
03/
03 /. 03/
202420242024202420242024
2024
49 0001_2 00012
000120001200012
000000000000000000000000
L94!94l-94]-94 ]-94 L94
794]_941-9 41941-9 4
008008008008008008
008008008008008008008008
0500s0050050050050
0s00s0050U5U050050050050
050
FOOTHILLS SUN-GAZETTE
GRNWD PH r&rr 03/20 TH
4 00r_061062063001
029
001
060012
04L
0 01_
I2
L2L2I2I2I21-212
l-94]-94
1-9 4L94
l_65 165165165r-65165
FRESNO CITY COLLEGE
REGTSTRATfON 03/2024
FRESNO OXYGEN
SUPPLTES 03/2024
FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY CO.
PULSAR BOOTS 03/2024 FILM STRETCH 03/24PVC SLIP/CEMENT, 03/2024 sHovEL 03/2024 9F'AL 03/2024
STRAP RBBR TfE DWN 3/24
309)
44 609I
10 041_10 418 042r0462
0463
042L
060060060050060
029029029o29029
029
23.8.55 SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1. 04O5 ,060.029299.0O TRAINfNG (POST REIMBURSE 001.0411.050.036
93.05 GREENWOOD PARK 001 . 0407 . 080 .543
165 00047
16s 0006s165 00120
981-610
SPEC]AL SPECTAL
SPECIALSPECIALSPECIALSPECIAL
DEPARTMENTDEPARTMENT
DEPARTMENTDEPARTMENTDEPARTMENTDEPARTMENT
EXPEN
EXPENEXPENEXPENEXPENEXPEN
0014s0013500136
641854 050
00137001_38 00139
46 ACS FINANC]AL SYSTEM
03 / 19 / 2024 L5 :42 :2"7
VENDOR NAME
DESCRTPTION
FRU]T GROWERS SUPPLY SPRAY FLAT/STRNR O
RESPTRATOR 03/2024
sHovEL 03/2024
CEMENT/VALVE 03/20FLAG STAKE 03/2024
GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE F'-86 03/2024
GRISWOLD, LASALLE, CITY COUNCIL 03
CTTY MANAGER 03
TODD COMPNIES S
AIVIOLINT ACCOUNT NAME
Schedule of Bifls
EXPENEXPENEXPEN
FUND & ACCOUNT
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 10
CLAIM INVOTCE PO# F/P ID LTNE
I72-LO54537L1 6298r0457o3/06-03/L7/24
27 4521 45
3/2424
L94!941-9410A1011-941-947941-941,94 10/1-9 4
008008
008
008008008008008008008008
008
008
008
008008008
000000000000000000
00 000000
0 0
00 0
0 0
000
0000
000000000
0 00070007000700070007000700070007000700070007
0403
0404
04050415
04L6
0418042Lu422
046L
0462
o463
338933903391_
o29029
029029
o29
062
062
0 01-
00005050
1-1,1
3660I725
586
270
540
337
1- ,1,4'7
41-
1564
31 83
94 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTSPECIAL DEPARTMENTSPECIAL DEPARTMENTSPECIAL DEPARTMENTSPECIAL DEPARTMENT *VENDOR TOTAL 04620462
042r042L 042r
060060050060060
0 410o4620402
060060050
o25025025
92439r73
92439685924405L3
924407 5L9244L721
r_65 165165i'65165
001400 014 t0074200143
001-44
EXPEN OO1EXPEN OO1
2,LL8.73 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER 004.04L4.060.032 165 00064 COBB,
/ 2024/ 2024
TF*M 3/24
LEGAL SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICESLEGAL SERVICES *VENDOR TOTAL
RETAINE OO1
RETATNE 062
RETAINE OO1
l-55165165
000ss0005500057
HEALTH WISE SERVI
SHARPS KIOSK 03 ^EC /2024
H]GH SIERRA AG fNC srTE SPRAY 03/2024
IBARRA SR/FELIPE
CLEAN RESTROOMS 3/24
INTERWEST CONSULTING GRO
BLDNG & SFTY SERV 3/24BLDNG & SFTY SEP*V 3/24
I45.63 SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 062.0462.060.O29810.00 CoNTRACTURAL SERVTCES 001.0421.060.028 600.00 CONTRACTURAL SERVICES 001.042I.060.028
165 00159
L65 00124L65 00229
00007
584.08
2 ,2L8 .66 2,802.14
45 04
FIRE PREVENTION
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES *VENDOR TOTAL
o04.041-4001,.041-5
1-551-55
3030
o 41-
028
060060
0000700008
KAWEAH DELTA MED]CAL CEN vrsrT 03/2024 VIS]T VI
VTVTVI VI VIVTVf VIVTV] VI VI VI VI VI
DRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDR
HS
S rTSI
S] SISI
SI>a
SI sISISTSI SI
SI
SI
.E351536
24 83
272I
88 o239
00r001001051uh2063001029001060o7204-L00100r_
041-204290406
04500412
044L
0402041_ 1
1-9 419410A7941-9 41,9 41-9 4
0007000700070007000700070 013
03 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 2024o3'/2O2403 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 202403 / 2024 000
000
0 006
4 0
00 0
FIEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTH
HEALTH
HEALTH
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
TNSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCEfNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE 0010010010010 01_
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
011-9
008008
SI
00 2a
04)t
5050
050 PTL OUTPTNT 03/24 050
47 ACS FTNANCIAL SYSTEM
03 / L9 / 2024 1-5 : 42 :2'7
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
Schedule of Bifls
FUND & ACCOTINT
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-VO8 .21 PAGE 11
CLAIM INVO]CE PO# F/P ID LINE
399 S PALM
cow-2024-0L
9130-1083168
AIVIOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
CAL
3/24 3/24 3/24 3/24 3/24
3/243/24 3/24 3/24
3/24 3/243'/ 24 3/24 3/243'/ 24
1. /)Li't zs
KAWEAH DELTA MED] HSPTL OUTPTNT O
HSPTL OUTPTNT O
IT 03/ rr o3'/ rr 03/ rr 03/ rT o3/. IT 03/ rr 03/ IT 03/ rr 03 /. rT 03/ IT 03/ rr o3'/ TT O3l IT O3,/ IT 03/ IT 03,/
DR VTSDR VTSDR VISDR VISDR VIS
DR VISDR VISDR VISDR VISDR VfSDR VISDR VIS
DR VISDR VlSDR VTSDR VISDR VISDR VIS
CEN
050050050
0500500500s0050
008008008
194
l-947947941-941-9 4
HSPTLHSPTL
HSPTLHSPTLHSPTLHSPTLHSPTLHSPTL
HSPTLHSPTLHSPTLHSPTLHSPTL
HSPTLHSPTLHSPTL
OUTPTNT OOUTPTNT OOUTPTNT OOUTPTNT OOUTPTNT OOUTPTNT O
OUTPTNT OOUTPTNT OOUTPTNT OOUTPTNT OOUTPTNT OOUTPTNT OOUTPTNT O
OUTPTNT OOUTPTNT OOUTPTNT O
CENTER PC yr 03/2024
rr 03/2024
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
*VENDOR
HEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
*VENDOR
]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCE
TOTAL
INSURANCETNSURANCE
INSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCE]NSURANCEfNSURANCE
INSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCE
TOTAL
1-9 4
1941-94l-941-9 4
L941-941-9 4]-94
0000300003000030000300003
1-65 00215
4 4
1 4
3 10
3 1t7555
0 2
50 001
229
l_151bb2L
OA
4I
21-
A6
6957
o75276
001061u6z063
0 01_
029
001060012o 41, 001
0403
Q404
040504150 41-60 418 042r
0422
046L
0462
0463 04r2
o429
0406
045 00472o44r
0402
0 016
0 01600160 0160 0150 0160 016001_5
001-6001600r_6
001
001001001001001
001
0010 01_0 01-001
0010 01_001001061
01)9
01 60
72 52
48 96
62 3535
15 3624
83 2'7
000160001600016
008 00016
008008008008008
008008008008008008
008
008008008008008008
008008008008008008008
0500500s00500s00s0
050050
505050
50505050505050
0001600016
1_9 41-9 4
194194L94
000
00000
0000
0000000000000000000000000000
0000
1-9 4194
1qa 104194L94L94
L94194
0 016
1-94194
KS ELECTRIC
BLDNG PERM #6231 03/24
LA LASER
448.00 BU]LDING PERMITS
050.0080s0.008
001.0302 .000.022
008008
062063
2024202420242024
2024202420242024202420242024
20242024202420242024
0403
0404
04050 415
04L6
0 418
0 421-o422
046r
0462
0463
0 41-2
0429
040604600472o 441-
o402
00000
000000
00 00
00000
00 6
4 000
0 3)3333
33 2L
88o2
39 011-9
45 o4
00000
00 15
04 22
00 0 41-
001
0500s0050
008008008
]-94 794
]'94
1-9 4
194
00003000030000300003
00003
LINGUISTICA INTERPRETTNG
INTERPRETATTON SERV 3,/24
MEDALLION SUPPLY
AWG THHN STRNDED 03/24
987 .78 SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1. 0402 .060.029
339.A7 WOODI,AKE STUDIO 001 . 0421_ . 060 . 074
165 00009
165 00116
48 ACS F]NANCIAL SYSTEM
03 /19 /2024 L5:42:27
VENDOR NAIqE DESCRIPTION
MEDALL]ON SUPPLY STUDIO SUPPLIES 03/24
CITY OF WOODLAKE
Schedule of Bi11s GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 12
AI'{OUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT PO# F/P ID LINE
L94 .84534.01_
6 ,6'75 .31
1,403.88
HEALTHHBALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH *VENDOR
INSURANCETNSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
TOTAL
001.0421 .060.0'74
CLAIM INVOICE
9130-1083251
MENDOZA/RUDY
REIMBURSEMENT 03/2024MfLEAGE REIMBRSMNT 3/24
I ZO . Z+
3r1 .52
r, o43 .16
WOODLAKE STUDIO *VENDOR TOTAL
TRAVEL, CONFERENCES & ME TRAVEL, CONFERENCES & ME *VENDOR TOTAL 030 030 060 060 0401 0401 0 01- 001 MNTRY & WSHNN 03/13-03/1-4/24 3308
5333903735115748603528624090
351 1226490
L9932159'7L5L1-6]-1 4
1240222860
165 00148
165 000481-65 002'77
00002 MIERZWI XRAYS
XRAYS
XRAYSXRAYSXRAYSXRAYSXRAYSXRAYS
XRAYSXRAYSXRAYSXRAYSXRAYSXRAYS
XRAYSXRAYSXRAYSXRAYS
KT/M
RFNDRFND
RFNDRFNDRFNDRFNDRFNDRFNDRFNDRFND
RFNDRFNDRFNDRFNDRFND
RFNDRFNDRFND
ICHAL 03/
03/
03 /.03 /. 03/
03/
03/
03/ 03/
o3'/
03/
03/
03/
03/
a3 /. 03/o3'/ 03/
20242024202420242024
2024202420242424202420242024
0403
0404
04050 415
0416
0 418
0 421-0422
046L
0462
0463
0 41-2
04290406
046 00472o 441-
0402
23 23
10I65518I459
400
2YZ
1 1330
3 0
2 8
997
00000
00000
0000000
0002 nnn?0002
0402
00020002
0002
00020002 nnn?
L941AA]-94 7941-9 4
1-9 41-9 41-9 41941941,9 4 L94
008008008008008
008008008008008
0500500s00500s0
050050
0 01-0 01_001001001
001001
87 6835
4A
4545
18 03
050.008
050.008 050.008050.008 050.008050.0080s0.008
0s0.008
L94L94L94L941-9 4
L94
I4
51 31
1-4 I40103
40 '7'78179
00r061062
063001029001060072041
001
202420242024
14 95
35 04
298
55 296
651
2024 )n)a
2024
1/r^
o1'/5ozq a /ao
050050050
000200020002000200020002oo02
NORCAL OUTDOOR SUPPL
BENCH WITH BACK 03
Y CO
WOODLAKE STUDIO
ORCHARD EXPENSES
0 0 1 . 0 4 0 6 . 0 8 0 . 5 4 1
oor.0421. 060 . 046
L65 001-26
NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS
LIME/COPPER 03/2024 155 00134
OFFICE DEPOT
PAPER/BNDR/TI SSUE
MOUSE/THRML ROLL
PENS/FLGS/PAPER O
OFFICE
OFFICEOFFICE *VENDOR
SUPPLIESSUPPLIES
SUPPL]ES TOTAL
0 01-
001001
0 4100 410
0 411
060060060
023023
uzs
010101
165 00128 165 001-29 165 00130
PACE SUPPLY CORP
FULL FACE RBBR GSKT 3/24
PAPE MACHINERY
wrNDow PANE 03,/2024
PEDREGAL BUILDING MATERI
CHISELED PST CP 03/24
386.20
1 .59 0462
04620 407
060060
080
029
029
543
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 062
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 062
GREENWOOD PARK OO1
165 001_17
165 001-47
) Lal c,L 165 00121
49 ACS F]NANCIAL SYSTEM
03 / 1"9 / 2024 L5 : 42 :2'7
VENDOR NA-IVIE
DESCRIPTTON
PENA/EL]SA CREDIT REFUND 03/24
PORTERVILLE ASPHALT
STREETS DEPT 03/24
STREETS DEPT 03/24
QUADIENT LEAS]NG USA TNC POSTAGE MACH LEASE 3/24
RODRIGUEZ /BLANCA wrR DEP RFND 03/2024RODRIGUEZ /LORENZO WTR DEP REFUND O3/2O24
SELF HELP ENTERPR]SES ]N GENERAL ADMIN 03/2024
SILVAS O]L COMPANY fNC DTESEL FUEL 03/2024
SOUTHERN CALTF EDISON CO
MNZANILLO LFT STN 3/24
CTY ADMN BLDNG 03/24
WATER DEPT 03/2024
MA]NT. DEPT 03/2024 PARKS DEPT 03 /2024
SEWER DEPT 03/2024
ATRPORT 03/2024
SBDVSN LIGHTNG 03/24
STREETS 03/2024
oRCHARD O3'/2024
3 / 20243 / 2024
CITY OF WOODLAKE GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 13
AIVIOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
Schedul-e of Bills
CONTRACTURAL SERV]CES CONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERV]CESCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICES PROJECT DESIGNCONTRACTURAL SERV]CESCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERV]CESCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVTCES *VENDOR TOTAL
FUND & ACCOUNT
001.0000 .200.034
o29029
CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
498.96 UTIL]TY DEPOSITS
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 062.0462
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 063.0463 *VENDOR TOTAL
582 W.MTN VIEW 155 00053
165 00112 155 00113 050 060
060050060060
001001001001
696938
90l_8 25065839
290290
581
l_0821 10821
QUAD - KNOPF WDLK GAS STN 03/24
GRNWD SUBDVSN 03/24H]LLSIDE ESTATES 03/24 KAWEAH AVE SBDVSN 3/24 CAJON ROUNDABT 03/2024
MLBRRY ESTATES 03/24
CYCL 5 A"rP 03/2024
RNDBT MLBRY & NRNJO 3/24
WDLK GIS RPSTRY 03/24
CLEAN CA BEAUT 03/24
MED CLNC 136 S.VLNA 3/24
GENERAL SERV. 03/2024
I5
,3
5 ,2
3 ,8,3,0
L2
,8
0010 01-0010 01_02200r_ 028
023
0 41-6
o 41-6
04L6
o4L60s90
04]-6 0590
05900 41-6
04L604L604L6
060060050
0607490507507 51-
o28o28o28
028028028028028
o2B
028028028
1-22371-122372122313 rzz3 / 51_2237 6 1-22377l-22378
42 .40 AA ))
52.34 44 .05
35 19'7355
64 55
22 t-651_65165
0001900020
2 l_
31 1_
23 9)
165165165 t65
r-65
16s
155165165
16s165l_65 165
l-65
0002100012000110001500016000r-300014000100001700018
12231 9l-223807223871-22382
4 722383
53,758
8,260.70
2,479 .50
L6 .44
832.23
4 ,739 .38 459.58
POSTAGE
UTILTTYUTILITY
HOUSING
SPECfAL
5r8.29
30 .25
001
DEPOSITS OO1DEPOSITS OO1
CONSTRUCTION O2'7
DEPARTMENT EXPEN O5O
0 410
00000000
07L'7
0450
060200200
080050
022
034
034
08r_
029
Q1224289360 N.CYPRESS
573 W.MNT VIEW
WLK1 8HM-DEC- 23
622358
165 000331-65 00001r_65 00002165 00054
1-65 00L27
7 4 .1-5
SPEC]AL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 063 UTIL]TIES OO1 UTILITIES 063 UTILITIES
UTILITIESUTILITTESUTILITIESUTILITIES UTILITIES
ORCHARD EXPENSES
ORCHARD EXPENSESORCHARD EXPENSES
041 nto001
062
o62
001
0463
041_0 o463
0 418
042L
u46 2
044L0429
042204620462
042L
050060060050060060
02902]- o2]-
Q21-
02L 02r
021-021-02]- 046046046
l-6516516516516s
l-65l-65
00022
0002soQ026
00027
00028
000290003000031000320 0 041_ ooo4200046
060060
0010 01-062
060050060
8 0606
448.50433.05
132.54r-00.01
064 .53
86.7881 .4817 -66
ORCHARD OORCIIARD O
50 ACS 03/
ST JOHN'S RTVER
ASSMNT NO 730
VISALIA WOMENS
DR VISIT O3l
F]NANCIAL SYSTEM
L9 /2024 15:42:2'7 Schedule of Bi11s
ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 1-4
CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P rD L]NE
'7240004448
113 9
MAY 2024
MAY 2024
0031114-rN
Q2026189
771'7
1"20606267 0L0
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 2L6 E. NRN,JO 03/2024 CR & SIERRA RNDABT 3/24 oRCHARD 03/2024
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPT]ON
SOUTHERN TIRE MART
TRANSFORCE 03/2024
o24
2024
STOPSTICK LTD
sToP srrcK Krr 03/2024
SUPERIOR POOL PRODUCTS L
SDIUM HYPOCHLRTE 03/24
TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS INC vEHfcLE TOOLS 03/2024
TRUCK VAULT
TAHOE FLD RNGER 03/24
UBEO WEST LLC CITY PRINTER
PD PRINTER 03
CITY PRINTER
PD PRINTER 03
USA BLUE BOOK
STENNER PVMP 03/24
VISALIA FAMfLY PRACTICE
DR Vrsrr 03/2024
CIVIC CENTER C]VIC CENTER *VENDOR TOTAL
756.00 CONTRACTURAL SERVICES
UTILITIES
UTILITfES
ORCHARD EXPENSES *VENDOR TOTAL
]NTEREST EXPENSE 062
SEWER LOAN 24OK D STILLW 062 *VENDOR TOTAL
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES
0406.080. s420550.080.542
0 62 . 0 462 . 0 6 0 . 0 2 8
0 0 1 . 0 4 1 1 . 0 6 0 . 0 2 8
03 / 2024
SPECIALTY
2024
AMOUNT
458.23
15.33 B.L7
2L
,
899 .9r268.L1,
6 ,636 .206 ,904 .34
004 .0414.060 . 021- 00L.o422.060.02r062 .0462. 060 . 046 0462 .060
042L .060
032
o46
165165165
000890027 I0027 9
533.05 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER 062
375.00 ORCHARD EXPENSES 001
l-65
r_55
001-45
00095
165 00062 165 00063
165 000941,65 00122
165 00111
165 00066
STILLWELL/DAVID
INTEREST O3l2
PR]NCIPAL O3l
04620000
060.065200.064
r,1,42.38 CONTRACTURAL SERVTCES 001.0411.060.028
1,282.T6 SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 063.0463 .060.029
TAYLOR GROUP ARCHITECTS
WDLK Crvrc CENTER 3/24
WDLK CTVIC CENTER 3/24
202040
00i_ 001 31, 308 3r_,308 62 ,6L6
44347 9644347 96
5234036452340364
o28
028028028
060060
050060
03 / 2024
/ 20.2403 / 2024/ 2024
88B8
0005100052
1651-65
? '7Lq q)
L
,
024 .26544 .05
1, 310 .69 696.L9 3,575.L9
CONTRACTURALCONTRACTURALCONTRACTURALCONTRACTURAL *VENDOR TOTAL
SERVICES
SERVICESSERVICESSERVfCES
001.041-0001_.04110 01 . 0410001.0411
t_65 t-65165165
00034
000350004300044
00 1, 658 . 05 SPECfAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 063
15.00 HEAI,TH INSURANCE 004
].5.00 HEALTH INSURANCE 001
0463
04:-4
0 411
060.029
050.008
050.008
00289498 165 001_23
r_94 00005194 0001_5
51 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03 / 1"9 / 2024 L5 : 42 :2'7
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
WOODLAKE GROWERS SUPPLY
MEASURING SHEETS 03/24
PAINT 03 /2024
SUPPLfES' 03/2024ELECTRIC TAPE 3/24
ELECTRIC TAPE 03/24TEFLON TAPE 03/2024
T'LDF' n1 /)A)a x'niTrii''nilci o z / z o z s DOG FOOD 03/2024 MASKING TAPE 03/24 D\I.] aAD A2/)A)L eoir 7i'r'Asii p.6" 6 i t z o z + TAPE 03/2024
WOODLAKE HARDWARE CO
Schedufe of Bi1ls
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
7 287
SPEC]AL DEPARTMENT EXPEN SPEC]AL DEPARTMENT EXPEN FfRE STATION MAINTENANC FIRE STATION MATNTENANC FIRE STATION MA]NTENANC FTRE STATION MAINTENANC FIRE STATION MAINTENANCWOODLAKE STUDfO
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES FIRE STATION MAINTENANC
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN FIRE STATION MAINTENANC *VENDOR TOTAL FUND & ACCOUNT CLATM INVO]CE
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.2]. PAGE 15
PO# F/P TD LTNE
80 28
13 4z
66 53
L9
5 1_8
0455
2'727
6t39
9603
6L
84 0 01-
0010040040040040040 01_001004063001004
o4L4
o406
0 411o 43-4
o463
0 418
04]-4
2903r12903432904532905672907 39290't 522907 7 7
29L0l.2291_06 6 29]-469 29L524291-585 29I630
16s165165r-55155165165165165165165165165
0009600097
o0L02
00103
001040010s001_05 00107001320009800099001000 0101
0906
01'79
o42204220 41-4
060060
029029034034
o29029
034
001960 01940019500160
04L404]-4 04]-4042042o42
i_65 165r-6516516s165165t-6516s155165]-65 165l_65 165
16s1_551_65165t_65l_65 165
3s6
421-
50956660062t3631646
656
034034034034
FA1
028
060060060060060
080060060050060060060
060
060
0600600600600606o606060606
08 coNcRETE MrX 03/2024
NUTS/BOLTS /CAULK 03/ PRNIGN BLD/BIT SET 3
CONDUIT CPLNG/ELBW O
NUTS/BOLTS 03/2024
sHo MOULDTNG 03/2024
sHo MOULDTNG 03/2024
WATER TANKS 03/2024
FLR STOP/BRSH/PPR 3/24 lNTn \7lT.r/F n2 /t/ 'ctileuC7eieofr26rvnr 03 / 24 WTR TANK ADP"IR 3/24
CREDTT 03/2024
WHT PATNT CAULK 03/24
KEYBLANK 03/2024CLEANER POLISH 03/24
DTSC CUT OFF 03/2024
CoNDUIT EMT GALV 03/24
NUTS/BOLTS 03/24
WIRE BRUSH 03/2024
DT.TT1: TAD n1. /)i)a uilidze'diri' oiit4PRO MAX BRUSH 03/24 WSHR HEAD/DRILL SET 3/24
WSHR HEAD/SCRWS 03/24'
wHT NYL popn oz/z+'
TROWEL 03/2024 Nurs/eolrb 03/2024
WLNT FNSH/BRSH 03/24
DUSDTER KtT 03/2024
PAINT BRUSH 03/2024
GORILLA TAPE' 03/2024
24 /z+ 3/24
3658
701E98
54 01
3031
69 49
)q
A1
54'7
99 54
'7
'7 1-32
8 I4
4L
13 153
3 40
5 2
1,'732
2326
I
8 10
8 39
L6
22 L610
1-0 4
21 3
21-
050060060060060060060050060
165i_55 1651651-65165165
0413
48 2.633
5861CR851,6 9)ao
91-
042Io463042]-
041_ 8 o422
0463
04220406
0423
0462042L0423
042] 0463
04t-8 042r
0406
04180 41804620 421-0 421-o 421-0 421-
042L042L
074
074
029 o)q014
0'7 4014029
014
029029029
o295410s0
029074
050
074
029 n?g
o74 54I
029029029
014029029014
o74
n?q
Ar836'7'7
A183734A183758
AL83t 7 9
At_83780 4L83824A184032
.A184041A184049
A184051_ A184056A184090
A1841-05A184145
A1-8 41-71-A1-84L'7 44L84l-1 6A1-841-9'7
A184330Al-84384A184515Al_ 84 51_ 7
.A184557
00r_97 00r-9800200001_99 002010 0161_ 00r6200202001650016300164001670016600169 00203
00214
00168
00204
001700020s
00206
o o1-7 20 017l_ 00173
00247
0021_5 00175
001_7 6
5686
40 0524
15 WOODLAKE STUDIO
WOODLAKE STUDIO
SPECIAL DEPARTMENTSPECfAL DEPARTMENT
WOODLAKE STUDIOWOODLAKE STUD]O WOODLAKE STUDTO
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT
WOODLAKE STUDIO
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT
SPECIAL DEPARTMENTSPECIAL DEPARTMENTSPECIAL DEPARTMENT
WOODLAKE STUDTO
CARWASH EXPENSESSPECIAL DEPARTMENT
WOODLAKE STUDIO
CARWASH EXPENSES
WOODLAKE STUDfO
SPECfAL DEPARTMENT
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT
WOODLAKE STUDIOWOODLAKE STUDIO
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT
SPECIAL DEPARTMENTSPECIAL DEPARTMENT
WOODLAKE STUDIO
SPEC]AL DEPARTMENT SPECIAL DEPARTMENT
WOODLAKE STUDIOWOODLAKE STUDIO
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT
EXPENEXPEN
0 01_001063
o42042046
A18 3
A18 3A1B 3418 3A18 3A18 3A18 3Al_83A18 3
1 1
3 I1
EXPENEXPEN
EXPENEXPENEXPENEXPENEXPENEXPENEXPENEXPENEXPEN
EXPENEXPENEXPEN
050060060060060060080060
0010010 01_001063001001001063001
00100r_ 0620010 01-0 01_0530010010010 01-00r_ 062001001001 001001001
000000
00 165l_55 165
52 ACS FINANC 03/19/2024 IAL SYSTEM 1-5 :42 :27
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
WOODLAKE PLUMBING
STUDIO SERVICES 03/24
Schedufe of Bills
AIVIOTINT ACCOIINT NAME
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO]-
WOODLAKE STUDIO OO1WOODLAKE STUDIO OO1
WOODLAKE STUDIO OO1WOODLAKE STUDIO
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
WOODLAKE STUDIO
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
WOODLAKE STUDIOWOODLAKE STUDIO
SPECTAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
WOODLAKE STUDIO
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
GREENWOOD PARKGREENWOOD PARK
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
WOODLAKE STUDIOWOODLAKE STUDIO
WOODLAKE STUDIOWOODLAKE STUDIO
SPECfAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
GREENWOOD PARK
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECfAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN VEH]CLE MAINTENANCE/OPER WOODLAKE STUDIO
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES *VENDOR TOTAL
I ,29'J. . OO WOODLAKE STUDIO
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 1-6
FUND & ACCOUNT PO# F/P ]D LINE
o01-.o42L.O60 .074
CLAIM ]NVOICE
A184558
A1,A4699 At 84'723
At-847 59
A184802At- 84 81,3 A184838Ai_84871 A1-84877
A184887
Ar84945A1-84952
A184953
Ar84954
A'18 510 7
A185171A1851_79 Al_85199 A1-85272A185691?\185771
A18s773A1858304185835A185093Ar-85173A186253
4t86267
A186268A186387
813603s81360818136086
1111_
WOODLAKE HARDWARE CO
NUTS/BOLTS/TAPE 03/24
TH]NNER/SANDPAPER 03 / 24 wD sHrM 03/2024
HOOK,PWR STRP 03/2024
WHT PAfNT CAULK 03/24
NUTS/BOLTS 03/2024
NUTS/BOLTS 03/2024 swrrcH 03/2024
CREDTT 03 /2024
PVC 03 /2024
ROOF CiIMENT 03/2024
DUCT TAPE 03/2024
KN]FEICARD/CMNT 03/24 scKT HEX Brr 03/2024
wrRE BRUSH 03/2024
THRD STL ROD 03/24
THRD STL ROD 03/2024GT LD WD TRNSPLNTER 3/24
MED GRN ENAMEL 03/24
BLAIR HYDRANT 03/2024
GLVS/WHEEL C'I / SEAL 3 /24
CAULK/SEAL 03/2024EXT CORD/TAPE 03/2024
BATTERIES 03/2024UTILITY BLADE 03/2024WD SHIM/ADHESfVE 03/24NUTS/BOLTS 03/2024 PAINT BRUSH/SPRAY 3/24 UTILITY KNIFE 03/24
NUTS/BOLTS 03/24
BLADE DISPENSER 3/24
BATTERIES 03/24NUTS,/BOLTS/CAULK 03 / 24
1018
9 336Z
a6
38 060060060060060
080080050060060060
36 21-13
1t- 3
t
31 4
3636
10 5
l_3
45I4zb
3l6
3 91-
2925t7
) z36
) )9'7
68 92028585
69 09
9696CR86l_0 3773))066L
5403t238
L451
z523
09'7439
5'7
64 5156
2'7
0 418
042L0421"
0406
042r
0 418
042404630463 o42t0421-
041_80 421,
0 418AL))
04070407
0418A A))
0463042r 042r
042a042L
0 418
040'1
0 418
0422
0290'7 4
074
54]- 074
029 ol4o29
029
074074
029014029o29543543
029
029029
074
0740'7 4
074
029
543o29
00218
002L9
001_83 00186001850 0184
00220
00187
001890018800190
0022L
00208
nnrnqo0222
00223
oo22400193
0021"2
0021300211
0 01-92
0021-7
0021-00 0191
0010 01_
0010630630010010 01-
00100100100100100r001
0630 01_0 01_0 01_00r_0 01_ 001
0010010 01_001001001001
165165
165
165
155165l_65 165165165l_65
1_651_55 16s
060060
060080060060060060
060060
165165165
0 0174
00L7 7
165165
165r-65
001780017900182001800 0181
0021-6
78oo
155165165165
6060bU
029
0290320'7 4029028
042L
04l_ 1_o421-041-8Q 41-1-
66 0
000000
000
165165165
r-65l-551-65l_65 165155 00131_
53 ACS FINANCTAL SYSTEM
03 /19 /2024 !5:42:27
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
REPORT TOTALS:
Schedu]e of Bi1ls
FUND & ACCOI'NT CLAIM INVOICE
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL540R-V08.2i_ PAGE 1-1
AMOUNT PO# F/P ID L]NE
281, s01 . 15
ACCOUNT NA]VIE
RECORDS PRINTED - OOO598
54 ACS FTNANC 03/a9/2024 IAL SYSTEM 1-5 :42:2'7 Schedufe of Bi11s
THE PRECEDING LTST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
DATE APPROVED BY
CITY OF WOODI,AKE
GLO6OS-VO8 . 2]- RECAPPAGE
GL54OR
55 I
CITY OF WOODLAKE ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM ozTwl)ozq 18: Check Register BANK VENDOR CHECK#
BANK BANK OF THE SIERRA
000856 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE 74'764
BANK OF THE SfERRA
DATE
03/Le/24
PAGE
AMOUNT
750.00750.00
GL540R-V08.21 l56
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03 /19 /2024 l-8 :
BANK VENDOR
REPORT TOTALS:
Check Register
CHECK#
RECORDS PRINTED 000001
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR.VO8 .21 PAGE 2
DATE AMOUNT
750.00
57 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
B/a9/2024 78:46:L'7
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
FIDELITY NATIONAL
APN#o60-170-108
TTTLE
03 / 2024
Schedufe of Bills
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT
75O. OO SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1"O4O2.060.O29
CLAIM INVOICE
20L2400445-1-
CITY OF'WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 1
PO# F/P ]D LINE
19s 00001
58 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03 / 1,9 /2024 !8 ;46 : A'7
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
REPORT TOTALS:
Schedule of Bi1ls
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 2
AMOUNT
7s0.00
ACCOUNT NAME
RECORDS PRINTED - OOOOO1
FUND & ACCOIINT CLAIM ]NVOICE PO# F/P rD L]NE
59 ACS 03/ FINANC]AL SYSTEM L9 / 2024 !8 : 46 :1-'7 Schedul-e of Bi11s
THE PRECEDTNG LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
DATE APPROVED BY
C]TY OF WOODLAKE
GLO6OS_VOB . 21 RECAPPAGE
GL5 4 OR
60 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03/19/2024 18: check Register
BANK VENDOR CHECK#
BANK BANK OF THE SIERRA
000856 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE 14765
BANK OF THE SIERRA
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_VOB.21 PAGE 1
DATE AMOUNT
03/te/24 550.00
550.00
61 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03/L9/2024 18:
BANK VENDOR
REPORT TOTALS:
Check Register
CHECK#
RECORDS PRINTED 000001
CITY
GL540R-V08.21
OF WOODLAKE
DATE
PAGE
AMOUNT
550.00
62 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/19/2024 L9: Check Register
BANK VENDOR CHECK#
BANK BANK OF THE SIERRA
000856 FIDELfTY NATIONAL TITLE 74766
BANK OF THE SIERRA
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 1
DATE
03/19/24
AMOUNT
1, 500 . 00
1,500.00
63 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/L9/2024 19 z
BANK VENDOR
REPORT TOTALS:
Check Register
CHECK#
RECORDS PRINTED . OOOOO1
C]TY OF WOODLAKE GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 2
DATE AMOUNT
1. 500 .00
64 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/a9/2024 19:03:58
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPT]ON
FIDEL]TY NATIONAL TITLE 120 - 027, 090- 073, 120 - 0!
Schedufe of Bil-1s
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT
1,5OO.OO SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO7.O4O2,060.O29
C]TY OF WOODLAKE GL54OR-VO8 .21 PAGE 1
CLAIM ]NVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
201-24Q0442-1, 199 00001
65 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/L9/2024 19:03:58
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
REPORT TOTALS:
Schedule of Bil1s
FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVO]CE
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 2
AMOUNT PO# F/P ID LINE
1,s00.00
ACCOUNT NAME
RECORDS PRINTED 000001
66 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/1-9/2024 19:03:58 Schedule of Bills
THE PRECEDTNG LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENTDATE APPROVED BY
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GLO6OS-VO8 . 21 RECAPPAGE
GL5 4 OR
67 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/19/2024 l-9: Check Register
BANK VENDOR CHECK#
BANK BANK OF THE S]ERRA
000856 FIDELTTY NATIONAL TITLE 7476'7
BANK OF THE SIERRA
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.2]. PAGE 1
o3/a9/24
AMOUNT
750.00750.00
68 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/19/2024 19:
BANK VENDOR
REPORT TOTALS:
Check Register
CHECK#
RECORDS PRINTED _ OOOOO1
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-VO8 .21 PAGE 2
DATE AMOTINT
750.00
69 ACS FINANCTAL SYSTEM 03/L9/2024 19:09:56
VENDOR NAME
DESCR]PTION
FIDELfTY NATIONAL
APN#o60-120-001
TITLE
03 / 2024
Schedule of Bil1s
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT
75O. OO SPECfAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1. 0402 .060.029
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.2]- PAGE 1
CLAIM ]NVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
20L2400443 -L 200 00001
70 ACS FTNANCIAL SYSTEM 03/L9/2024 19:09:56
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
REPORT TOTALS:
Schedule of Bi1ls
FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GLS4OR-VO8 .21 PAGE 2
AMOIINT PO# F/P ID L]NE
750.00
ACCOUNT NAME
RECORDS PRINTED - OOOOO1
71 ACS
03/L
FINANC
e /2024
IAL SYSTEM L9:09:56 Schedule of Bil-l-s
THE PRECEDING L]ST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
DATE APPROVED BY
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GLO6OS_VO8 . 21 RECAPPAGE
GL5 4 OR
72 ACS FINANCTAL SYSTEM 03/L9/2024 19: Check Register
BANK VENDOR CHECK#BANK BANK OF THE SIERRA
000856 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE 74'768
BANK OF THE SIERRA
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-VO8.2]- PAGE 1
DATE
03/re/24
AIVIOUNT
750.00750.00
73 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03 /a9 /2O24 19:
BANK VENDOR
REPORT TOTALS:
Check Register
CHECK#
RECORDS PRINTED - OOOOO1
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR.VO8.21 PAGE 2
DATE AMOUNT
7s0.00
74 ACS F
o3 / 1-e
NANCIAL SYSTEM
2024 3.9 : 16 z 46 I Schedule of Bil1s
ACCOUNT NAME FTIND & ACCOUNT
SPECTAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO]-.0402 .06O.029
CLAIM INVOICE
20L2400444-1
CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 1
PO# F,/P ID LINE
201 00001
VENDOR NAME
DESCR]PT]ON
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
APN#O6O-27 O - 0a7 - O0O 3 / 24
AMOUNT
750.00
75 ACS FINANCTAL SYSTEM
03 /a9 /2024 19:16:46
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
REPORT TOTALS
Schedule of Bi11s
ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE
CTTY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 2
AMOUNT PO# F/P ID LINE
750.00
RECORDS PRINTED 000001
76 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03 / a9 / 2024 19 :76 : 46 CITY OF WOODLAKE GLO5OS_VO8 . 21 RECAPPAGE GL54 OR
Schedul-e of Bilfs
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
DATE APPROVED BY
77 City of Woodlake
AGENDA ITEM IV-C
March 25, 2024
Prepared by Ramon Lara, City Staff
SUBJECT:
Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of the Purchase of the Property with APN No. 060- 073-010 for the Construction of the City of Woodlake Civic Center and Reaffirm Resolution No. 24-31
BACKGROUND:
The City of Woodlake currently operates all City Administrative and Police services out of a single building. The entire Police Department currently operates in approximately 2,500 sqft of floor space including lobby, interview rooms, evidence rooms, storage, dispatch, holding areas, IT closets and office space. The City had to move evidence out of the Police Department and into storage units due to the lack of space. As the City of Woodlake continues to grow, foot traffic and requests for services will continue to increase at a rapid pace, putting more strain on an already at-capacity building. The current layout of City Hall and the Police Station also presents occupational hazards and privacy concerns. In-person requests for police assistance are made in a shared lobby with City Hall where others may hear their conversations. Filing a report requires victims to enter the lobby in the presence of people conducting regular City business (paying bills, signing up for services, etc.) and may deter the victim from filing the report.
The City of Woodlake worked with Senator Hurtado to address the current space needs for both the Woodlake Police Department and City Hall. The Senator was able to help procure seven million dollars for the construction of a new Civic Center in the City of Woodlake. The City is proposing to develop a ~10,000 sqft Civic Center that would serve three functions:
1. Police Department Administration
2. City Hall Administration
3. Citizen Service Center (CSC).
The Citizen Service Center would be available to the public for community meetings, used as a heating/cooling center throughout the year and would be equipped with technology that will allow it to function as a base of operations for emergency services.
DISCUSSION:
The City of Woodlake City Council previously approved Resolution No. 24-31 for the purchase of the property with APN No. 060-070-010. The APN No. should have been APN No. 060-073-010. Resolution No. 24-31 was updated to show the proper APN No. and this item clarifies the update to the resolution.
78 RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the Council approve the purchase of the property with APN No. 060-073-010 for the Construction of the City of Woodlake Civic Center.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City of Woodlake General Fund would cover the purchase of the property as previously budgeted for.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution: Approval of the Purchase of the Property with APN No. 060-073-010 for the Construction of the City of Woodlake Civic Center and Reaffirm Resolution No. 24-31
2. Attachment No.1 – APN Map
79 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WOODLAKE
COUNTY OF TULARE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the matter of:
APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY ) Resolution No.
WITH APN NO. 060-073-010 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION )
OF THE CITY OF WOODLAKE CIVIC CENTER AND )
REAFFIRM RESOLUTION NO. 24-31 )
Councilmember __________, offered the following resolution and moved its adoption.
Approval of the purchase of the property with APN No. 060-073-010 for the construction of the City of Woodlake Civic Center and reaffirm Resolution No. 24-31.
WHEREAS, the City of Woodlake wishes to construct a Civic Center that will house City Hall and Police Department Administration; and
WHEREAS, the City of Woodlake Civic Center would allow for the public to receive adequate services in an appropriate setting; and
WHEREAS, the Civic Center would also serve as a Citizens Service Center and be available for community meetings, heating/cooling center, and be equipped with technology to allow it to function as a base of operations for emergency services; and WHEREA, the City agrees to purchase the property for $273,000 and will cover all closing costs.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODLAKE DOES RESOLVE to approve the purchase of the property with APN No. 060-073-010 for the construction of the City of Woodlake Civic Center while authorizing the City Administrator to execute all necessary documents.
The foregoing resolution was adopted upon a motion of Councilmember ________, and seconded by Councilmember _________, and carried by the following vote at the City Council meeting held on March 25, 2024.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_____________________
Rudy Mendoza, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________
Irene Zacarias, City Clerk
80 81
AGENDA ITEM V-B
March 25, 2024
Prepared by Emmanuel Llamas, City Staff
SUBJECT:
Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of Certification for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Final Environmental Impact Report – Public Hearing
BACKGROUND
The City of Woodlake circulated an Initial Study (IS) and Notice of Preparation (NOP) (referred to collectively as “NOP”) of the EIR for the proposed Project from May 4, 2022, to June 3, 2022 to trustee and responsible agencies, the State Clearinghouse (State Clearinghouse #2022040640), and the public. Following publication of the original NOP, changes were made to the proposed Project that consisted of an increase in project acreage and a change in Land Use Designation.
The IS/NOP was recirculated to the public, trustee and responsible agencies, and the State Clearinghouse from October 12, 2022, to November 14, 2022.
The Draft EIR was properly noticed and circulated for public review and comment for 45 days, from May 10, 2023, through June 26, 2023. The Notice of Availability was published in the Sun Gazette on May 10, 2023. The Draft EIR and Appendices were sent to the State Clearinghouse for distribution and notices were mailed to local agencies and other interested individuals. The City received two comment letters on the Draft EIR within the public review period. Each letter is reproduced in its entirety in Chapter Two of this Final EIR and responses are shown after each comment, which can be seen in the attached Final EIR document.
DISCUSSION:
Under CEQA, the Lead Agency must prepare and certify a Final EIR prior to a proposed project being approved.
The City of Woodlake is the Lead Agency on the project and has prepared a Final environmental Impact Report on the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park which includes expanding an existing industrial area by developing a 1.5 million square foot industrial center on a 113-acre site that will house various industrial uses. The complete Project description, location and the potential environmental effects are contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report.
The Final EIR allows the public and the City an opportunity to review revisions to the Draft EIR and the responses to comments received during the Draft EIRs public review period. The Final EIR serves as the environmental document to inform the City of the environmental consequences of the proposed project, either in whole or in part, or one of the alternatives to the project discussed in the Draft EIR.
If the City approves the Project, and as part of that action adopts mitigation measures, the City will also adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (see Public Resources Code 82 Section 21081.6), and will also provide a Facts, Findings, and Statement of Overriding Consideration (see California Code of Regulations Title 14 Section 15093).
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That the Woodlake City Council approve the Approval of Certification for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Final Environmental Impact Report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The environmental review was paid for by the applicant.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Woodlake Holdings EIR SOC Findings
2. Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project Final EIR
3. Resolution: Approval of Certification for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Final Environmental Impact Report
83 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WOODLAKE
COUNTY OF TULARE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the matter of:
APPROVAL OF CERTIFICATION OF THE )
WOODLAKE HOLDINGS INDUSTRIAL PARK ) Resolution 24-
PROJECT FINAL ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT REPORT )
Councilmember ____________ offered the following resolution and moved its adoption.
Approval of Certification for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Final Environmental Impact Report.
WHEREAS, the project consists of the following:
1. Project components include developing a 1.5 million square foot industrial center on a 113-acre site that will house various industrial uses allowable by the zone district, including cannabis cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, and retail, which is allowable with a Conditional Use Permit. The site will operate from 7am to 6pm Monday through Friday. Project components include constructing and operating an industrial park with seventeen buildings ranging in size of 75,000 sf to 87,000 sf for a total of up to 1,500,000 sf of industrial space. The project at full build-out will require approximately 20 employees and will operate from 7am to 4pm Monday through Friday. The Project expects to generate an average of 20 deliveries per day using standard vans, with a total of 80 generated daily trips.
WHEREAS, the site of proposed project is located in Woodlake; and WHEREAS, the City of Woodlake is the Lead Agency on the project and has prepared a Final environmental Impact Report on the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was properly noticed and circulated for public review and comment for 45 days, from May 10, 2023 through June 26, 2023. The Notice of Availability was published in the Sun Gazette on May 10, 2023.
WHEREAS, The City received two comment letters on the Draft EIR within the public review period. Each letter is reproduced in its entirety in Chapter Two of the Final EIR and responses are shown after each comment.
WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Report consists of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and a Facts, Findings, and Statement of Overriding Consideration which has been incorporated into the approval of the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Woodlake City Council hereby approves of the Certification for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Final Environmental Impact Report.
The foregoing resolution was adopted upon a motion of Councilmember _______________and seconded by Councilmember __________________ and carried by the following vote at the City Council meeting held on March 25, 2024.
84 AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_____________________
Rudy Mendoza, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Irene Zacarias, City Clerk
85 City of Woodlake
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR
Facts, Findings, and Statement of Overriding Considerations Regarding the Environmental Effects from the
Environmental Impact Report
State Clearinghouse # 2022040640
March 2024
86 Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
2 Table of Contents
FACTS, FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS .............................. 4
1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4
2.0 Project Summary ............................................................................................................................... 4
2.1 Project Description........................................................................................................................ 4
2.2 Project Location............................................................................................................................. 5
2.3 Project Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 6
2.4 Actions Covered by the EIR......................................................................................................... 6
3.0 Environmental Review Process Summary; Content of EIR and Record ................................... 7
3.1 Initial Study / Notice of Preparation........................................................................................... 7
3.2 Draft and Final EIR....................................................................................................................... 8
3.3 Content of the EIR......................................................................................................................... 9
3.4 Record of Proceedings ................................................................................................................ 10
3.4 Public Hearings ........................................................................................................................... 11
4.0 Preliminary Findings ...................................................................................................................... 12
4.1 Lead Agency; Independent Judgment ..................................................................................... 12
4.2 Public Review Provided ............................................................................................................. 12
4.3 Purpose of Errata and Corrections; Clerical Errors ................................................................ 12
4.4 Clerical Errors .............................................................................................................................. 12
4.5 Evaluation and Response to Comments .................................................................................. 13
4.6 Recirculation of Final EIR Not Required ................................................................................. 13
4.7 MMRP; Mitigation Measures .................................................................................................... 14
4.8 Substantial Evidence ................................................................................................................... 14
4.9 Entirety of Action ........................................................................................................................ 15
4.10 Effect of Public Comments ......................................................................................................... 15
4.11 Independent Review of Record ................................................................................................. 15
4.12 Adequacy of EIR to Support Approval of the Proposed Project .......................................... 15
4.13 Project EIR Findings ................................................................................................................... 15 87 Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
3 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND FINDINGS ..................................................................... 16
5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 16
5.2 No Environmental Impacts........................................................................................................ 18
5.3 Less Than Significant Environmental Impacts ........................................................................ 19
5.4 Less Than Significant Environmental Impacts With Mitigation .......................................... 23
5.5 Environmental Impacts Not Fully Mitigated to a Less Than Significant Level ................. 26
5.6 Alternatives .................................................................................................................................. 29
5.7 Growth Inducing Impacts .......................................................................................................... 37
5.8 Statement of Overriding Considerations ................................................................................. 39
6.0 Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report ........................................................... 42
6.1 Findings ........................................................................................................................................ 42
7.0 Adoption of Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ................................................... 43 88 Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
4 FACTS, FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS
1.0 Introduction
The City Council of the City of Woodlake (City), in approving the proposed Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project (the Project or proposed Project), makes the Findings described below and adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations presented at the end of the Findings. The Draft Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #2022040640) was prepared by the City acting as lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Hereafter, unless specifically identified, the Recirculated Initial Study / Notice of Preparation (IS/NOP), Notice of Availability & Completion (NOA/NOC), Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR or Draft EIR), Appendices, Technical Studies, Final EIR containing Responses to Comments and textual revisions to the Draft EIR (in the Final EIR), and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) will be referred to collectively herein as the “EIR”. These Findings are based on the entire record before the City Council, including the EIR. The City Council adopts the facts and analyses in the EIR, which are summarized below for convenience. The omission of some detail or aspect of the EIR does not mean that it has been rejected by the City.
2.0 Project Summary
2.1 Project Description
The Project Applicant intends to expand an existing industrial area by developing a 113-acre industrial center that will house various industrial uses allowable by the zone district, including cannabis cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, testing and retail, which is allowable with a Conditional Use Permit.
Project Components:
• Constructing and operating an industrial park with seventeen buildings ranging in size of 75,000 sf to 87,000 sf for a total of up to 1,500,000 sf of industrial space. • Constructing internal access roads, 700 parking spaces and associated landscaping, as detailed on Figure 4 – Site Plan, Draft EIR.
• Connecting the Project to the existing City water, wastewater, and storm drain systems. Any grow operations will utilize the existing well connection for water. 89 Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
5 • Installation of perimeter security, including lighting and an alarm system, in accordance with Chapter 5.48 of the Woodlake Municipal Code.
• Constructing three new ponding basins of 7.93 Ac ft, 8.42 Ac ft, and 16.42 Ac ft.
Construction will begin in 2024 and will continue to buildout as the market demands.
Project Operations
The site will operate from 7am to 6pm Monday through Friday. The facility’s electrical needs will continue to be serviced by existing Southern California Edison connections that have been assessed as sufficient for full operation of allowable industrial uses, including indoor/mixed light cannabis cultivation.
Once a business is established, water needs for the grow houses will be serviced by existing deepwater wells while water needs for the distribution facilities and sanitary facilities will be provided by the City. Stormwater will be kept on-site and wastewater will be connected to the City’s existing system.
To accommodate this Project, the following entitlements are required:
• General Plan Amendment to change the designation of 61 acres from Urban Reserve to Industrial
• Conditional Use Permit to operate under a Cannabis Business License (Cultivation, Manufacturing, Retail, Testing and Distribution) for cannabis businesses • Lot line adjustment as per the City’s requirements
• Tentative Parcel Map to divide the existing parcel into 21 separate parcels (see Figure 3 of the Draft EIR)
Refer to Draft EIR - Chapter Two – Project Description for the full description of the Project.
2.2 Project Location
The proposed Project is located on approximately 113-acres along the western edge of the City of Woodlake in Tulare County and is located on the east side of Blair Road, south of Ropes Avenue. The Project is on assessor parcel numbers 060-170-105, -106, 060-160-044 and -059. See Figure 1 – Regional Location, Figure 2 – Site Aerial, Figure 3 – Tentative Parcel Map, and Figure 4 – Site Plan in Chapter Two – Project Description. The site lies within Section 36, Township 17 South, Range 26 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian of the Woodlake USGS 7.5 minute quadrangle. 90 Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
6 2.3 Project Objectives
In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15124(b), the following are the City of Woodlake’s Project objectives:
1. To create an economically sustainable industrial complex that will provide business and job opportunities within the City of Woodlake.
2. To diversify the City of Woodlake’s economic and general commercial base
3. To ensure the provision of services and facilities needed to accommodate planned population densities in and around the City of Woodlake.
2.4 Actions Covered by the EIR
The City of Woodlake is the Lead Agency for the proposed Project. The Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project will be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council for comment, review and consideration for adoption. The City Council has the sole discretionary authority to approve and adopt the EIR for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project. In order to approve the proposed Project, the City Council would consider the following actions:
• Approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the designation of 61 acres from Urban Reserve to Industrial
• Approval of Conditional Use Permit to operate under a Cannabis Business License (Cultivation, Manufacturing, Distribution, Testing and Retail) for cannabis businesses • Tentative Parcel Map to divide the existing parcel into 21 separate parcels • Certification of the Project EIR
• Certification of the Final EIR
• Adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program • Adoption of 15091 and 15093 Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations • Issuance of Grading / Building Permits
As mandated by CEQA Guidelines Section 15124(d), this section contains a list of agencies that are expected to use the EIR in their decision-making, and a list of the approvals for which the EIR may be used. These lists include information that is known to the Lead Agency. A range of responsible and trustee agencies may utilize the EIR in the review of subsequent implementation activities over which that may have responsibility. A responsible agency is a public agency which has discretionary review approval power over a project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15381). A trustee agency is a state agency that has jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by a project which are held in trust for the 91 Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
7 people of the state (CEQA Guidelines Section 15386). The Project will require various permits and/or entitlements from regulatory agencies. These may include, but not be limited to the following:
• State of California Native American Heritage Commission • San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
• Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
• California Department of Cannabis Control
• California Department of Health
3.0 Environmental Review Process Summary; Content of EIR and Record
3.1 Initial Study / Notice of Preparation
The City of Woodlake circulated an Initial Study (IS) and Notice of Preparation (NOP) (referred to collectively as “IS/NOP”) of the EIR for the proposed Project from May 4, 2022 to June 3, 2022 to trustee and responsible agencies, the State Clearinghouse (State Clearinghouse #2022040640), and the public.
Following publication of the original NOP, changes were made to the proposed Project that consisted of an increase in Project acreage and a change in Land Use Designation. The IS/NOP was recirculated to the public, trustee and responsible agencies, and the State Clearinghouse from October 12, 2022 to November 14, 2022. The IS/NOP analyzed the following CEQA Appendix G topics, and it was determined that no significant impacts would occur that would require analysis in the Draft EIR:
1. Aesthetics
2. Biological Resources
3. Cultural Resources
4. Geology/Soils
5. Hazards & Hazardous Materials
6. Hydrology / Water Quality
7. Land Use / Planning
8. Mineral Resources
9. Noise
10. Population / Housing
11. Public Services
12. Recreation
13. Tribal Cultural Resources
92 Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
8 14. Utilities / Service Systems
15. Wildfire
Of these CEQA Appendix G topics scoped out of the EIR, the following individual impact questions were determined to have less than significant impacts with mitigation incorporated, and are further included in the subsection 5.4 of this Findings/SOC below:
1. Biological Resources (Impact 3.4-a)
2. Cultural Resources (Impacts 3.5-a, 3.5-b, 3.5-c):
Individual impact questions that were also determined to have no significant impact and were scoped out of the EIR include the following:
1. Transportation/Traffic (Impacts 3.17-c, 3.17-d): The Project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment), or result in inadequate emergency access.
The City received three comment letters during the NOP review period. NOP letters were received from:
• California Native American Heritage Commission – Provided regulations pertaining to AB 52 and SB 18.
• California Department of Conservation – Division of Land Resource Protection: Provided regulations pertaining to conversion of farmland to urban uses. • California Department of Cannabis Control – Provided information relating to role as Responsible Agency and to cannabis regulations. Also provided comments requesting project description details and general analysis requirements, in addition to a detailed table of specific comments.
These comment letters were identified and incorporated into the Draft EIR.
3.2 Draft and Final EIR
Draft EIR
93 Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
9 The Draft EIR was properly noticed and circulated for public review and comment for 45 days, from May 10, 2023 through June 26, 2023. The Notice of Availability was published in the Sun Gazette on May 10, 2023. The Draft EIR and Appendices were sent to the State Clearinghouse for distribution and notices were mailed to local agencies and other interested individuals. The City received two comment letters on the Draft EIR within the public review period. Each letter is reproduced in its entirety in Chapter Two of this Final EIR and responses are shown after each comment.
These comments and responses that make up the Final EIR, in combination with the Draft EIR, constitute the EIR that will be considered for certification by the decision makers of the City of Woodlake.
Final EIR
The Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) contains the public and agency comments received during the public review period for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project (proposed Project), and responses to each of those comments. The Final EIR is an informational document intended to disclose to the decision makers of the City of Woodlake (City) and the public the environmental consequences of approving and implementing the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project or one of the alternatives to the proposed Project, which are described in the Draft EIR. All written comments received during the public review period (May 10, 2023 through June 26, 2023) of the Draft EIR are addressed in this Final EIR.
The responses in the Final EIR clarify, correct, and/or amplify text in the Draft EIR. Also included in the Final EIR are minor text changes made at the initiative of the City (the Lead Agency) and in response to comments. The Final EIR was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code Sections 21000-21177).
The revisions outlined in the Final EIR fall within the scope of the original Project analysis included in the Draft EIR and do not result in an increase to any identified impacts or produce any new impacts.
No new significant environmental impact would result from the changes or from a new mitigation measures proposed to be implemented. Therefore, no significant revisions have been made which would require recirculation of the Draft EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 (Recirculation of an EIR Prior to Certification).
3.3 Content of the EIR
The Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park “EIR” is comprised of the following materials:
• The Final EIR including any attached appendices;
94 Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
10 • The Draft EIR including attached appendices;
• The Initial Study / Notice of Preparation and comments received in response to the Initial Study / Notice of Preparation;
• The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (“MMRP”); • Comments received on the Draft EIR with responses to each of the comments made; • The Notice of Completion and Availability of the Draft EIR for public review; and • Any other information added by the Lead Agency.
(All hereafter collectively referred to as the “EIR”).
Documents that shall accompany and be part of the EIR are:
1. Findings of Fact; and
2. Statement of Overriding Considerations.
The EIR, is hereby incorporated by reference into these findings without limitation. This incorporation is intended to address the scope and nature of mitigation measures, the basis for determining the significance of impacts, the comparative analysis of alternatives, and the reasons for approving the Project despite the potential for associated significant and unavoidable impacts.
3.4 Record of Proceedings
In accordance with CEQA Section 21167.6(e), the record of proceedings for the City’s decision on the Project includes, without limitation, the following documents:
• The IS/NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the scoping period for the Project;
• All comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the scoping comment period on the IS/NOP;
• The Draft EIR for the Project;
• All comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the comment period on the Draft EIR;
• Responses to agency comments on the Draft EIR (provided in the Final EIR); • The Final EIR for the Project;
95 Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
11 • Documents cited or referenced in the Draft and Final EIRs; • The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Project; • The Notice of Completion and Availability of the Draft EIR for public review; • All findings and resolutions adopted by the City in connection with the Project and all documents cited or referred to therein, including these findings; • All reports, studies, memoranda, diagrams, staff reports, or other planning documents relating to the Project prepared by the City, consultants to the City, or responsible or trustee agencies with respect to the City’s compliance with the requirements of CEQA and with respect to the City’s action on the Project;
• All documents submitted to the City by other public agencies or members of the public in connection with the Project up through final consideration of Project approval; • All minutes and/or verbatim transcripts, as available, of all public meetings held by the City in connection with the Project;
• Any documentary or other evidence submitted to the City at such public meetings, and any other information added by the City as Lead Agency; • Any other materials required to be in the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code Section 21167.6(e).
The official custodian of the documents comprising the record of proceedings is the City of Woodlake office, located at 350 N. Valencia Avenue, Woodlake, CA 93286. All files have been available to the Department and the public for review in considering these findings and whether to approve the Project.
3.4 Public Hearing
A Public Hearing was held at the City Council meeting on March 11, 2024 and held a public comment opportunity on March 25, 2024.
96 Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
12 4.0 Preliminary Findings
4.1 Lead Agency; Independent Judgment
The City of Woodlake is the “Lead Agency” for the proposed Project and evaluated the EIR. The City retained the independent consulting firm of Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. to prepare the EIR for the Project. Crawford & Bowen prepared the EIR under the supervision, direction, and review of the City. The City has received and reviewed the EIR prior to certifying the EIR and prior to making any decision to approve or disapprove the Project. The City finds it has exercised independent judgment in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21082.1(c)(3) in directing the consultant in the preparation of the EIR, as well as reviewing, analyzing, and revising material prepared by the consultant. The City finds that the EIR was prepared in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. The City finds that it has independently reviewed and analyzed the EIR for the proposed Project, that the Draft EIR was circulated for public review reflected its independent judgment, the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City, and that the EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City.
4.2 Public Review Provided
The City Council finds that the EIR provides objective information to assist the decision-makers and the public at large in their consideration of the environmental consequences of the proposed Project.
The public review period provided all interested jurisdictions, agencies, private organizations, and individuals the opportunity to submit comments regarding the Draft EIR. The Final EIR was prepared after the review period and responds to comments made during the public review period.
4.3 Purpose of Errata and Corrections; Clerical Errors
Textual clarifications are sometimes needed to describe refinements suggested as part of the public participation process. The changes and modifications made to an EIR after the Draft EIR was circulated for public review and comment can be made under Public Resources Code section 21092.1 or CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5 in the Final EIR.
4.4 Clerical Errors
The City recognizes that the EIR may contain clerical and/or typographical errors. The City reviewed the entirety of the EIR and bases its determination on the substance of the information it contains. 97 Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
13 4.5 Evaluation and Response to Comments
The City evaluated comments on environmental issues received from persons who reviewed the Draft EIR. In accordance with CEQA, the City prepared written responses describing the disposition of significant environmental issues raised. The Final EIR provides an adequate, good-faith and reasoned response to the comments. The City reviewed the comments received and responses thereto and has determined that neither the comments received nor the responses to such comments add significant new information regarding environmental impacts to the Draft EIR. The City has based its actions on full appraisal of all viewpoints, including all comments received up to the date of adoption of these Findings, concerning the environmental impacts identified and analyzed in the EIR.
4.6 Recirculation of Final EIR Not Required
The Final EIR documents comments and responses to the Draft EIR. The Final EIR incorporates information obtained and produced after the Draft EIR was completed, and the Final EIR contains clarifications to the Draft EIR. The City has reviewed and considered the Final EIR and all of this information. The information added to the Final EIR does not involve a new significant environmental impact, a substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact, or a feasible mitigation measure or alternative considerably different from others previously analyzed that the Project sponsor declines to adopt and that would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the Project.
No information indicates that the Draft EIR was inadequate or conclusory or that the public was deprived of a meaningful opportunity to review and comment on the Draft EIR or the Project.
Specifically, the City finds that the information was not “significant new information” as contemplated by CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5, and does not show:
(1) A new significant environmental impact would result from the project or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be implemented;
(2) A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result unless mitigation measures are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance. (3) A feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project, but the project's proponents decline to adopt it.
(4) The draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded.
Thus, recirculation of the Draft EIR is not required.
98 Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
14 4.7 MMRP; Mitigation Measures
CEQA requires the Lead Agency approving a project to adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) or the changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The mitigation measures included in the EIR as certified by the City as adopted by the City serves that function. The MMRP includes all of the mitigation measures and Project design features adopted by the City in connection with the approval of the proposed Project and has been designed to ensure compliance with such measures during implementation of the proposed Project. In accordance with CEQA, the MMRP provides the means to ensure that the mitigation measures are fully enforceable.
Unless specifically stated to the contrary in these findings, it is this City Council’s intent to adopt all mitigation measures recommended by the EIR that are applicable to the Project. If a measure has, through error, been omitted from the Approvals or from these Findings, and that measure is not specifically reflected in these Findings, that measure shall be deemed to be adopted pursuant to this paragraph. In addition, unless specifically stated to the contrary in these Findings, all Approvals repeating or rewording mitigation measures recommended in the EIR are intended to be substantially similar to the mitigation measures recommended in the EIR and are found to be equally effective in avoiding or lessening the identified environmental impact. In each instance, the Approvals contain the final wording for the mitigation measures.
In accordance with the requirements of Public Resources Section 21081.6, the City hereby adopts the MMRP. The mitigation measures identified for the proposed Project were included in the Draft EIR and Final EIR to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment and has been designed to ensure compliance during Project implementation. As revised, the final mitigation measures for the proposed Project are described in the MMRP. Each of the mitigation measures identified in the MMRP is incorporated into the proposed Project and made a condition of approval for permits, required by agreement, or other measures to ensure the MMRP is fully enforceable. The City finds that the impacts of the proposed Project have been mitigated to the extent feasible by the mitigation measures identified in the MMRP.
4.8 Substantial Evidence
The City finds and declares that substantial evidence for each and every finding made herein is contained in the EIR, which is incorporated herein by this reference, or is in the record of proceedings in the matter.
99 Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
15 4.9 Entirety of Action
The City is certifying an EIR for, and is approving and adopting findings for, the entirety of the actions described in these Findings and in the EIR as comprising the proposed Project.
4.10 Effect of Public Comments
The City finds that none of the public comments to the Draft EIR or subsequent public comments or other evidence in the record, including any changes in the proposed Project in response to input from the community, include or constitute substantial evidence that would require recirculation of the EIR prior to certification of the EIR and that there is no substantial evidence elsewhere in the record of proceedings that would require substantial revision of the EIR prior to its certification, and that the EIR need not be recirculated prior to its certification.
4.11 Independent Review of Record
The City Council, after receiving a recommendation from the Planning Commission, certifies that the EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA. The City Council has independently reviewed the record and the EIR prior to certifying the EIR and approving the Project. By adopting these Findings, the City Council on behalf of the City confirms, ratifies, and adopts the findings and conclusions of the EIR as supplemented and modified by these Findings. The EIR and these Findings represent the independent judgment and analysis of the City and the City Council.
4.12 Adequacy of EIR to Support Approval of the Proposed Project The City certifies that the EIR is adequate to support all actions in connection with the approval of the proposed Project. The City Council certifies that the EIR is adequate to support approval of the proposed Project described in the EIR, each component and phase of the proposed Project described in the EIR, any variant of the Project described in the EIR, any minor modifications to the proposed Project or variants described in the EIR, as well as all components of the proposed Project.
4.13 Project EIR Findings
In accordance with Public Resources Code section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines sections 15091 and 15092, the City makes the specific findings required by CEQA with respect to each area of potential environmental impact as further set forth in this Section of these Findings. These Findings do not 100
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
16 repeat the full discussions of environmental impacts, mitigation measures, and related explanations contained in the EIR. The City ratifies, adopts, and incorporates, as though fully set forth, the analysis, explanation, findings, responses to comments and conclusions of the EIR. The City adopts the reasoning of the EIR, staff reports, and presentations provided by City staff and the independent consulting firm of Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc., as may be modified by these Findings.
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND FINDINGS
5.1 Introduction
City staff reports; the EIR; written and oral testimony at public meetings or hearings; these facts, findings, and statement of overriding considerations; and other information in the administrative record (as further defined above) serve as the basis for the City’s environmental determination. Public Resources Code Section 21081 requires that the City Council make one of the following findings for each significant impact:
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR;
2. Those changes or alterations are within the purview and jurisdiction of another public agency, and such changes have been, or can and should be adopted by that other agency; or
3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the EIR.
The same requirements for adopting these findings are also contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a). Public Resources Code Section 21061.1 defines "feasible" to mean "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, and environmental, social and technological factors". By this document, the City Council makes the findings required by Public Resources Code Section 21081 with regard to the proposed Project.
Additionally, Public Resources Code Section 21002 provides that "public agencies should not approve projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects." It also states, "in the event specific economic, social, or other conditions make infeasible such project alternatives or such mitigation measures, individual projects may be approved in spite of one or more significant effects thereof."
101
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
17 The three available findings under Section 21081 and Guideline Section 15091(a) allow an approving agency to specify, as to particular significant environmental impacts, whether the agency is (a) adopting mitigation measures recommended in an EIR; (b) identifying measures that lay outside its control but should be, or have been, adopted by another agency; or (c) identifying measures that are infeasible. For projects with EIRs that include numerous mitigation measures that are either infeasible or outside the approving agency's control, findings may be very lengthy, as they must explain, for example, why some measures are rejected as being infeasible. In contrast, where the approving agency chooses to adopt each and every mitigation measure recommended in an EIR, there would seem to be little point in repeated invoking, over many dozens of pages, the finding that "[c]hanges or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the final EIR." Guideline Section 15091(a).
Where significant impacts are not avoided or significantly lessened, a public agency, after adopting proper findings, may nevertheless approve the project if the agency first adopts a statement of overriding considerations setting forth the specific reasons why the agency found that the project's benefits rendered acceptable its unavoidable adverse environmental effects. CEQA Guidelines §§15093, 15043(b).
The findings below are the City Council’s best efforts to set forth the evidentiary and policy bases for its decision to approve the proposed Project in a manner consistent with the requirements of CEQA.
These findings are not merely informational but, rather, constitute a binding set of obligations that come into effect with the City Council’s approval of the proposed Project. The City Council adopts these findings for the entirety of the actions described in these findings and in the Final EIR.
Having received, reviewed, and considered the Final EIR and other information in the record of proceedings, based on the substantial evidence the City Council hereby adopts the following findings in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines.
1. Findings regarding the environmental review process and the contents of the Final EIR.
2. Findings regarding the environmental impacts of the proposed Project and the mitigation measures (General Plan policies, etc.) for those impacts identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the Project.
3. Findings regarding alternatives and the reasons that such alternatives are rejected.
4. Statement of Overriding Considerations determining that the benefits of implementing the proposed Project outweigh the significant and unavoidable environmental impacts that will result and therefore justify approval of the proposed Project despite such impacts.
102
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
18 5. Findings regarding the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
The City Council of the City of Woodlake certifies that these findings are based on its full appraisal and consideration of all viewpoints expressed in written correspondence and testimony regarding the proposed Project, including all comments received up to the date of adoption of these findings, concerning the environmental issues identified and discussed in the Final EIR. The City Council adopts the findings and the statement of overriding considerations for the approvals that are set forth below.
The detailed analysis of potentially significant environmental impacts and proposed mitigation measures for the Project is presented in Chapter 3, Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation of the Draft EIR. Responses to comments on the Draft EIR, along with copies of the comments, are provided in Chapter Two of the Final EIR.
The EIR evaluated 20 major environmental categories for potential impacts as outlined in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. Of these 20 major environmental categories, this City Council concurs with the conclusions in the EIR that the issues and sub issues discussed in Subsection 5.2, Subsection 5.3, and Subsection 5.4, below are either no impacts, less than significant without mitigation, or can be mitigated below a level of significance. Forthe remaining potential environmental impacts that cannot feasibly be mitigated below a level of significance discussed in Subsection 5.5, overriding considerations exist that make these potential impacts acceptable to this City Council.
5.2 No Environmental Impacts
The City Council hereby finds, based upon substantial evidence in the record including the EIR and as discussed below, that the following potential environmental areas result in no impacts by the Project and no mitigation is necessary or required.
Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Impact AG-2: The Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract.
Facts and Findings: The Project site is designated in the City of Woodlake General Plan as Industrial and Urban Reserve and is zoned as Light Industrial (ML), subject to an approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP), General Plan Amendment, Lot line adjustment, and a Tentative Parcel Map. Therefore, with the approval of these entitlements, no conflicts with agricultural zoning would occur and there would be no impact related to an agricultural zoning conflict. 103
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
19 As noted, the Project site is not subject to a Williamson Act contract, pursuant to Government Code Section 51200 et seq. Therefore, there would be no conflict with a Williamson Act Contract and as such, no impacts to this subject area. As such, there are no impacts related to this topic.
Impact AG-3: The Project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)), or result in the loss of forest land or convert forest land to non-forest use.
Facts and Findings. The proposed Project site lies in the eastern portion of the Central Valley floor, where there is no forest land. The Project is not zoned for forestland, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production and does not propose any zone changes related to forest or timberland. As such, there are no potential impacts resulting from forest or timber land conflicts or conversion of forest land to nonforest use. As such, there are no impacts related to this topic.
5.3 Less Than Significant Environmental Impacts
The City Council hereby finds, based on substantial evidence in the record including the EIR and as noted below, that the following potential environmental impacts of the Project are less than significant and therefore do not require the imposition of mitigation measures.
Agriculture and Forest Resources
Impact AG-4: The Project would not Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
Facts and Findings: In summary, the proposed Project site consists of land designated as Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance as designated by the FMMP and the northern portion of the site has been designated in the City of Woodlake General Plan as Industrial while the southern portion is designated as Urban Reserve. The entire 113-acre site is zoned as Light Industrial.
The proposed entitlements are site-specific and do not apply to any properties other than the proposed Project site. Therefore, it is unlikely that the Project would result in the conversion of other farmland.
Additionally, there is no forest land in the Project vicinity. Potential impacts are less than significant and no mitigation is required.
104
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
20 Air Quality
Impact AIR-1: The Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan.
Facts and Findings: In summary, the Project’s air emissions are less than significant for all criteria pollutants and would not result in inconsistency with the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District’s (SJVAPCD) Air Quality Plan (AQP). The Project complies with applicable control measures of the AQP and therefore, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the AQP.
In addition, the Project is consistent with City of Woodlake General Plan policies related to air quality that will help further the goals of the AQP. Thus, the impact is less than significant and no mitigation is required.
Impact AIR-2: The Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard.
Facts and Findings: Since the Air Basin is nonattainment for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5, it is considered to have an existing significant cumulative health impact without the Project. When this occurs, the analysis considers whether the Project’s contribution to the existing violation of air quality standards is cumulatively considerable. The SJVAPCD regional thresholds for NOX, VOC, PM10, or PM2.5 are applied as cumulative contribution thresholds. Projects that exceed the regional thresholds would have a cumulatively considerable health impact. As shown in Table 3-9 and Table 3.10 of the Draft EIR, the regional analysis of construction and operational emissions indicates that the Project would not exceed the SJVAPCD’s significance thresholds and the Project is consistent with the applicable Air Quality Plan. Thus, the impact is less than significant and no mitigation is required.
Impact AIR-3: The Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
Facts and Findings: In summary, the Project would not exceed SJVAPCD localized emission daily screening levels for any criteria pollutant. The Project is not a significant source of Toxic Air Contaminant emissions during construction or operation. The Project is not in an area with suitable habitat for Valley fever spores and is not in area known to have naturally occurring asbestos.
Therefore, the Project would result in less than significant impacts to sensitive receptors and no 105
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
21 mitigation is required.
Impact AIR-4: The Project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.
Facts and Findings: The cannabis grow facility might generate localize construction and operational odors associated with the equipment operation, which could be potential odor sources for nearby residents. Chapter 5.48 (N) of the City of Woodlake Municipal Code states, “Cannabis business shall provide a sufficient odor absorbing ventilation and exhaust system so that odor generated inside the facility that is distinctive to its operation is not detected outside the Premises, outside the building housing the Cannabis business, or anywhere on adjacent property of public rights-of-way.” As such, the proposed Project and it future tenants are not expected to produce any offensive odors that would result in frequent odor complaints. Any impacts would be less than significant and no mitigations are required.
Energy
Impact ENE-1: The Project will not result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during Project construction or operation.
Facts and Findings: The Project would result in less than significant impacts on the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary use of energy due to Project design features that will comply with the City’s design guidelines and regulations that apply to the Project such as Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and the California Green Building Standards Code.
For the cannabis production energy documents will be required for lighting, cooling, heating, water heating and building modifications envelopes to be compliance with Building energy efficiency standards and other applicable building codes. These will be submitted with building plans prior to construction at the time of approval. As a result, the electricity use will not result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation. Furthermore, various federal and state regulations including the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Pavley Clean Car Standards, and Low Emission Vehicle Program would serve to reduce the transportation fuel demand by the Project.
With the adherence to the increasingly stringent building and vehicle efficiency standards as well as implementation of the Project’s design features that would reduce energy consumption, the proposed 106
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
22 Project would not contribute to a cumulative impact to the wasteful or inefficient use of energy. As such, the Project would not result in a significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during Project construction or operation and any impacts would be less than significant.
Impact ENE-2: The Project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.
Facts and Findings: The Project is subject to CCR, Title 24 building standards. Compliance with Title 24 of the CCR would improve energy efficiency and consumption. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with applicable plans related to renewable energy and energy efficiency. As a result, the Project will not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Impact GHG-1: The Project would not generate direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions that would result in a significant impact on the environment.
Facts and Findings: The proposed Project’s GHG impact is determined by its consistency with applicable statewide and regional GHG reduction plans. The proposed project would be consistent with the CARB’s 2017 Scoping Plan goals that aim to reduce air quality and energy (which in turn reduce GHG emissions), as such the Project will comply with applicable reduction plans and GHG emissions are less than significant. The proposed Project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment; the impact is less than significant.
Impact GHG-2: The Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases.
Facts and Findings: The Project incorporates a number of features that would minimize GHG emissions. These features are consistent with project-level strategies identified by the CARB’s Scoping Plan. The Project will be consistent with the strategies of CARB’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan as applicable, including California Light-Duty Vehicle GHG Standards, Energy Efficiency, and Low Carbon Fuel. As the proposed Project is consistent with the applicable plans, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases, any impacts to this checklist item are less than significant and do not require mitigation. 107
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
23 5.4 Less Than Significant Environmental Impacts With Mitigation Public Resources Code Section 21081 states that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been completed that identifies one or more significant effects unless the public agency makes one or more of the following findings:
• Changes or alternations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment.
• Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. • Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the EIR, and overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the Project outweigh the significant effects on the environment.
The following issues from the environmental categories analyzed in the Initial Study and EIR were found to be potentially significant, but can be mitigated to a less than significant level with the imposition of mitigation measures. This City Council hereby finds, based on substantial evidence in the record including the EIR and as noted below, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 that all potentially significant impacts listed below can and will be mitigated to below a level of significance by imposition of the mitigation measures in the EIR; and that these mitigation measures are included as Conditions of Approval and set forth in the MMRP adopted by this City Council.
Specific findings of this City Council for each category of such impacts are set forth in detail, below.
Transportation
Impact TRA-1: After mitigation, the Project would not conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
Finding: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.
Mitigation Measures: TRA – 1.
Facts in Support of the Finding: At full buildout, the proposed Project is estimated to generate a maximum of 3,501 average daily trips, 501 AM peak hour trips and 473 PM peak hour trips. All roadway segments and intersections are anticipated to operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS).
With the addition of project traffic in 2022, the intersection of Blair Road & Naranjo Boulevard (SR 108
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
24 216) is anticipated to operate below an acceptable level of service. Intersection improvements needed by the year 2042 to maintain or improve the operational level of service of the street system in the Project vicinity include addition of signal at the intersection of Blair Road & Naranjo Boulevard (SR 216).
Mitigation measure TRA-1 will require the developer to share approximately 61.25% of the cost of intersection improvements. With implementation of TRA-1, the level of service and traffic flow in the Project area will remain acceptable and impacts would be less than significant.
Impact TRA-2: After mitigation, the Project would not Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b).
Finding: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.
Mitigation Measure: TRA-2
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed industrial project is located in Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 2714, which has an average VMT/employee of 20.35 miles. The proposed industrial Project is considered a typical project within the TAZ and therefore the Project would be expected to have the same VMT per employee. There are no special considerations with the Project to assume the Project would produce a VMT/employee lower than the average for the TAZ. The threshold of significance for the industrial Project VMT/employee is if the Project VMT is below the average in the TAZ where the Project is located. Since VMT/employee is assumed to be equal to the average for the aforementioned zone, it is anticipated that the proposed Project will have a significant transportation impact prior to mitigation.
The Tulare County guidelines include detailed instructions for mitigation if a Project has significant impacts. The guidelines state “The preferred method of VMT mitigation in Tulare County is for project applicants to provide transportation improvements that facilitate travel by walking, bicycling, or transit.” In accordance with these guidelines, a survey was conducted within a half mile of the Project to determine any pedestrian, bicycle or transit facilities deficiencies exist. After review, there were existing curb returns which do not meet current ADA requirements for ramps as well as sidewalk improvements. The identified improvements, as shown in Figure 5 of the DEIR, include the following:
• Four (4) ADA compliant curb ramps at Acacia Street & W Ropes Avenue • Four (4) ADA compliant curb ramps at S Palm Street & W Ropes Avenue • Two (2) ADA compliant curb ramps at S Pepper Street & Ropes Avenue • Four (4) ADA compliant curb ramps at S Acacia Street & W Bravo Avenue 109
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
25 • 295’ of sidewalk on the south side of W Ropes Avenue between Mulberry Street & Acacia St • 305’ of sidewalk on the north side of W Ropes Avenue between S Pepper Street & S Palm Street • 285’ of sidewalk on the south side of W Ropes Avenue between S Acacia Street & S Palm Street The guidelines include a minimum cost for mitigation of $20 per daily trip generated by the Project.
As shown in Table 3-19 of the DEIR, the Project is anticipated to generate 3,501 daily trips, which Equates to a target value of improvements of $70,020. The total estimated Project cost is approximately $75,453. Therefore, with the construction of the above identified improvements, the Project will meet the minimum cost requirement for mitigation.
Pursuant to the guidelines, if a project provides mitigation which meets the minimum threshold listed above, the project can presume a 1% reduction in VMT. The assumed VMT/employee reduction is 1% of 20.35 or 0.2035. The resulting VMT/employee after mitigation is 20.15 which below the average VMT/employee in the TAZ which the Project is located. After mitigation, the Project will have a less than significant transportation impact.
The following issues from the environmental categories analyzed in the IS/NOP were found to be potentially significant, but can be mitigated to a less than significant level with the imposition of mitigation measures. This City Council hereby finds, based on substantial evidence in the record including the IS/NOP and as noted below, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 that all potentially significant impacts listed below can and will be mitigated to below a level of significance by imposition of the mitigation measures in the IS/NOP; and that these mitigation measures are included as Conditions of Approval and set forth in the MMRP adopted by this City Council. Specific findings of this City Council for each category of such impacts are set forth in detail, below.
Biological Resources
Impact 3.4-a: After mitigation, the Project would not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Finding: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.
Mitigation Measures: BIO-1, BIO-2, BIO-3, BIO-4.
Facts in Support of the Finding: From the CNDDB record search for special-status species, 16 are known from within five miles of the Project site (Appendix A of the IS/NOP). Of those species, San 110
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
26 Joaquin kit fox (mentioned above) and western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis californicus – SSSC) could occur on or near the Project site. In addition, burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia – SSSC) and pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus – SSSC) were identified in the nine-quad search and could occur on or near the Project site. Migratory birds could nest on or near the Project site. Bird species that may nest on or near the Project site include, but are not limited to, the house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus) and northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos).
Implementing Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO-4 would reduce any contribution to cumulative impacts on biological resources to a less than significant level.
Cultural Resources
Impact 3.5-a: After mitigation, the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5, or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5, or disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries.
Finding: Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.
Mitigation Measures: CUL-1, CUL-2.
Facts in Support of the Finding: From The Project area is highly disturbed, consisting developed industrial/warehouse uses and vacant land, lined on the western and northern boundaries with trees.
There are no known or visible cultural, historic or archaeological resources, paleontological resources, or human remains that exist on the surface of the project area.
Although no cultural or archaeological resources, paleontological resources or human remains have been identified in the project area, the possibility exists that such resources or remains may be discovered during Project site preparation, excavation and/or grading activities. Mitigation Measures CUL – 1 and CUL – 2 will be implemented to ensure that Project will result in less than significant impacts with mitigation.
5.5 Environmental Impacts Not Fully Mitigated to a Less Than Significant Level The City Council finds, based on substantial evidence in the record including the EIR and as noted below, the following environmental impacts identified in the EIR remain significant even after application of all feasible mitigation measures, as set forth below. The City also finds that any 111
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
27 alternative discussed in the EIR that may reduce the significance of these impacts is rejected as infeasible for the reasons given in the EIR and this Section of these Findings. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 1092(b)(2), the City Council of the City of Woodlake cannot approve the Project unless if first finds (1) under Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3), and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(3), that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provisions of employment opportunities make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR; and (2) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15092(b), that the remaining significant affects are acceptable due to overriding concerns described in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 and, therefore, a statement of overriding considerations is included herein. Each potential unavoidable significant impact is overridden as set forth below in the Statement of Overriding Considerations as described further in Section 5.8, and the City finds that specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the Project outweigh the significant effects on the environment.
Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Impact AG-1: The Project would convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use.
Finding: There are no mitigation measures available that would reduce the impact resulting from loss of farmland on the Project site.
Mitigation Measures: None.
Facts in Support of the Findings: Of the 113-acre site, the northern 52 acres of the site is designated as Industrial by the City of Woodlake and as Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial Land and Urban and Built-Up Land by the Farmland Mapping & Monitoring Program (FMMP). The southern 61 acres are designated Urban Reserve by the City of Woodlake and as Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance by the City of Woodlake. As such, the City has evaluated the Project’s farmland conversion impacts to 61 acres of farmland utilizing the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (LESA), which the California Department of Conservation developed to provide lead agencies with a methodology to ensure that significant effects on the environment of agricultural land conversions are quantitatively and consistently considered in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code §21095).
A single LESA score is generated for a given project after all the individual LE and SA factors have been scored and weighted. The LESA is weighted so that 50 percent of the total LESA score of a given project is derived from the LE factors and 50 percent is derived from the SA factors. The final LESA 112
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
28 score was determined for the proposed Project and the modeling results are described in Table 3-1 of the Draft EIR. According to the LESA Threshold of Significance, the total score of 56.33 for the proposed Project site is considered significant (see Appendix E of the Draft EIR).
Conversion of agricultural land to urban use is not directly mitigable, aside from preventing development altogether. There is no feasible mitigation measure that would reduce the impacts related to the Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance converted as a result of development of the proposed Project. Therefore, impacts as a result of farmland conversion are considered significant and unavoidable.
The City has considered mitigation through agricultural easements for the proposed Project.
However, in a recent Court of Appeals decision, King & Gardiner Farms v. County of Kern (2020) 45 Cal.
App. 5th 814, the Court found that a mitigation measure that requires a conservation easement over off-site farmland would not provide adequate mitigation for the loss of farmland that would result from the project. In the Court’s findings, it was determined that conservation easements do not compensate for the impact of converting farmland to non-farmland use because the mitigation would not create new farmland that would offset the loss of converted farmland.
Under CEQA, mitigation measures are deemed effective if they will substantially lessen or minimize an environmental impact. In this case, since an agricultural conservation easement or payment of inlieu fees wouldn’t reduce the impacts associated with loss of farmland on the proposed Project site, an agricultural conservation easement or payment of in-lieu fees would not be considered “effective” mitigation.
All feasible mitigation measures have been included in the Project’s Initial Study and the Draft EIR and will also be enforced as conditions of approval through the provisions of CEQA. However, the impact remains significant and unavoidable.
Impact AG-1 (Cumulative Level): The Project would convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use.
Finding: There are no mitigation measures available that would reduce the impact resulting from loss of farmland on the Project site.
Mitigation Measures: None.
113
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
29 Facts in Support of the Findings: The geographic area of this cumulative analysis is the entire State of California. This cumulative analysis is based on the Statewide FMMP map. As discussed above, the Project includes the significant impact related to the conversion of protected farmland. As such, the Project would have a significant and unavoidable and cumulatively considerable impact on agricultural resources.
As discussed above, the Project includes the significant impact related to the conversion of protected farmland to urban uses. Development of the Project will eventually lead to urban development and thereby contribute to the loss of viable agricultural land in the region. As such, when combined with other projects in the State that result in the removal of prime or protected agricultural lands, the Project would have a significant and unavoidable and cumulatively considerable impact on agricultural resources and a Statement of Overriding Considerations will be prepared for consideration by the City as Lead Agency.
5.6 Alternatives
CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6 requires the consideration of a range of reasonable alternatives to the proposed Project that could feasibly attain most of the objectives of the proposed Project. The alternatives analyzed for the Project are as follows:
1. No Project
2. Alternate Location
3. Reduced (50%) Project
These alternatives are described in more detail below.
1. No Project Alternative
CEQA Section 15126.6(e) requires the discussion of the No Project Alternative “to allow decision makers to compare the impacts of approving the proposed project with the impacts of not approving the proposed project.” The No Project scenario in this case consists of retaining the property in its original configuration, with no construction or operation of the proposed Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park. Under this alternative, the southern portion of the site remains in agricultural production.
Description
This alternative would avoid both the adverse and beneficial effects of the Project. This alternative would avoid ground disturbance and construction-related impacts associated with construction of the 114
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
30 proposed Project. No new development would occur on the site. The No Project Alternative would avoid the generation of any environmental impacts beyond existing conditions.
Environmental Considerations
Continuation of the site in agricultural production would result in all environmental impacts being less than the proposed Project. There would be no changes to any of the existing conditions and there would be no impact to each of the 20 CEQA Checklist evaluation topics. The No-Project Alternative by definition would not meet the objectives of the proposed Project that were outlined in Section 4.2, above. Impacts from the No Project Alternative, as compared to the Project, are summarized as follows:
• Aesthetics – With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Agriculture and Forestry Resources - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. This Alternative would also eliminate the significant and unavoidable impacts (project and cumulative) associated with this topic from the proposed Project. • Air Quality - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Biological Resources - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Cultural Resources - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Energy - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Geology/Soils - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Greenhouse Gas Emissions - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Hazards & Hazardous Materials - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project.
115
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
31 • Hydrology & Water Quality - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Land Use / Planning - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Mineral Resources - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Noise - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Population & Housing - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Public Services - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Recreation - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Transportation - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Tribal Cultural Resources - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Utilities & Service Systems - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project. • Wildfire - With no development, the southern portion of the site would remain as farmland and no new impacts would occur. Therefore, impacts are less than the proposed Project.
2. Alternate Location Alternative
The constraint on alternative site selection is the lessening or elimination of significant project impacts.
The economic viability of the proposed Project is dependent on ability to effectively develop an industrial project in the Woodlake area. To maintain most of the project objectives, any potentially feasible alternative site needs to be of adequate size and in a location that is accessible and serviceable (utilities) by the City of Woodlake.
Description
116
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
32 There are no industrial zoned sites within the City of Woodlake that provide adequately sized lands suitable for the proposed Project. The criteria for selection included whether or not the alternate site would substantially reduce environmental impacts, availability of land, adequately sized parcels, efficiency of access, and acceptable land use designations/zoning. There are areas of agricultural land of similar size located outside the City limits, in Tulare County, to the west west of the proposed Project. This area could conceivably support the proposed Project and is depicted in the Figure 6. The area is outside the City limits and is zoned and designated for agricultural uses, but is not within a Williamson Act Contract.
Perhaps the greatest obstacle in selecting an alternative site for the proposed Project is that the Project Applicant does not already own land at these locations and/or does not have control of land at these locations. However, for purposes of environmental evaluation, a description of potential environmental impacts is provided below.
Environmental Considerations
Development of an alternate site could theoretically meet most of the Project objectives presented earlier in this chapter. However, construction and operation of an alternate site would not be as cost effective or operationally efficient and thus is not consistent with the Project objectives. In addition, construction and operation at an alternate site would result in environmental impacts that are likely equal to or in some cases greater than the proposed Project. The majority, if not all of Project impacts are likely to occur at an alternate site.
The alternative site would require environmental review once the Applicant has prepared sufficient Project description information. The time requirements for these activities would reduce the ability of the Applicant to accommodate projected residential demand in a timely manner compared to the proposed Project. This alternative would be the most complex, costly, and time-consuming alternative to implement. Various engineering and technical studies would then be completed to define the Project and its components. Environmental review and obtaining entitlements would follow prior to construction activities. The site identified herein appears to have conditions that are not as favorable as the proposed Project site, such as having an agricultural land use designation and zone, and as mentioned earlier, lack of control over the land.
Impacts from the Alternate Locations Alternative, as compared to the Project, are summarized as follows:
• Aesthetics – With development of a similar project on an alternate site, aesthetic impacts would occur through the conversion of farmland to urban uses, introduction of light/glare, and construction of industrial development on vacant land. Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project. 117
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
33 • Agriculture and Forestry Resources - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, agricultural impacts would occur through the conversion of farmland to urban uses. Site development at this location; however, would convert 113-acres of land rather than the 61-acres of land proposed to be converted with Project implementation. Therefore, impacts are greater than the proposed Project.
This Alternative would not eliminate the significant and unavoidable impacts (project and cumulative) associated with this topic from the proposed Project. • Air Quality - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, air quality impacts would occur from construction activities (construction vehicles and equipment, dust and other emissions) and from operational activities (vehicle trip emissions and other emissions from the development).
Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project.
• Biological Resources - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, biological impacts could occur from development of a previously agricultural site to urban uses. Therefore, impacts are similar to the proposed Project.
• Cultural Resources - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, cultural resource impacts could occur from development of a previously agricultural site to urban uses. Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project.
• Energy - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, energy impacts would occur from construction activities (electricity, fuel) and operational activities (electricity, natural gas, fuel).
Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project.
• Geology/Soils - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, impacts to geology and soils would occur from construction activities (grading and land disturbing activities) and operational activities (the Alternative project would be subject to geotechnical evaluation). Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project.
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, greenhouse gas emission impacts would occur from construction activities (construction equipment emissions and vehicle emissions) and operational activities (vehicle emissions). Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project. • Hazards & Hazardous Materials - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, hazardous impacts would occur from construction activities and operational activities would have 118
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
34 similar impacts as the proposed Project. Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project. • Hydrology & Water Quality - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, hydrology and water quality impacts would occur from construction activities (water for dust control, requirement for preparation of a SWPPP, drainage control) and operational activities (water demand associated with the development, drainage control). Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project. • Land Use / Planning - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, land use and planning impacts would occur from development of existing agricultural lands to urban uses. The Alternative would not divide an established community. Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project. • Mineral Resources - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, mineral resource impacts could occur from construction activities (grading and ground-disturbing activities) and operational activities (conversion of land to urban uses). Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project. • Noise - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, noise impacts would occur from construction activities (construction equipment and vehicles) and operational activities (vehicles, air conditioners, etc.). The Alternative locations are similarly proximate to existing urban uses (as compared to the proposed Project). Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project. • Public Services - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, public service impacts would occur from development of these sites (need for police, fire, schools and other public facilities).
Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project.
• Transportation - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, transportation impacts would occur from construction and operation (vehicles associated with the industrial development).
Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project.
• Tribal Cultural Resources - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, tribal cultural resource impacts could occur from development of these sites (conversion of agricultural lands to urban uses). Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project.
119
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
35 • Utilities & Service Systems - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, utility and service system impacts would occur from construction activities (water for dust control, solid waste disposal) and operational activities (water demand associated with the development, wastewater disposal, solid waste disposal). Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project. • Wildfire - With development of a similar project on an alternate site, wildfire impacts could occur from development of these sites (conversion of agricultural lands to urban uses). Since this Alternative would be of similar size and scale to the Project, impacts are determined to be similar to the proposed Project.
3. Reduced Project (50%) Alternative
Description
This alternative would keep the same acreage, but would reduce the developed square footage from 1,500,000 square feet to 750,000 square feet. All other project components, including overall acreage would remain (ponding basins, etc.). This would result in larger spacing between buildings as compared to the proposed Project.
Environmental Considerations
Most of the environmental issues associated with this alternative would be similar to those of the proposed Project. However, this alternative does likely reduce impacts to the following areas:
• Air Quality - With development of the Project site with 50% of the building footprint (as compared to the proposed Project), air quality impacts would occur from construction activities (construction vehicles and equipment, dust and other emissions) and from operational activities (vehicle trip emissions and other emissions from the development). According to the Project’s Air Quality / Greenhouse Gas / Energy Study prepared for the Project, the proposed Project will have annual air pollutant emission rates that are less than the applicable San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District thresholds of significance. Even though the proposed Project is below existing thresholds of significance, this alternative would have lower annual emission rates than the proposed project for the following criteria pollutants: CO, NOx, VOC, SOx, PM10 and PM2.5. Air pollutant emission rates associated with this alternative are thus lower than the proposed project due to the reduced building footprint (and associated reduction in vehicle trips).
• Energy - With development of the Project site with 50% of the residential units (as compared to the proposed Project), energy impacts would occur from construction activities (electricity, fuel) and 120
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
36 operational activities (electricity, natural gas, fuel). However, since this Alternative would have 50% less building footprint as compared to the proposed Project, energy impacts would be less than the proposed Project.
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions - With development of the Project site with 50% of the building footprint (as compared to the proposed Project), greenhouse gas emission impacts would occur from construction activities (construction equipment emissions and vehicle emissions) and operational activities (vehicle emissions). However, since this Alternative would have 50% less building footprint as compared to the proposed Project, greenhouse gas emissions would be less than the proposed Project.
• Hydrology & Water Quality - With development of the Project site with 50% of the building footprint (as compared to the proposed Project), hydrology and water quality impacts would occur from construction activities (water for dust control, requirement for preparation of a SWPPP, drainage control) and operational activities (water demand associated with the development, drainage control).
However, since this Alternative would have 50% less building footprint as compared to the proposed Project, hydrology and water quality impacts would be less than the proposed Project. • Noise - With development of the Project site with 50% of the building footprint (as compared to the proposed Project), noise impacts would occur from construction activities (construction equipment and vehicles) and operational activities (vehicles, air conditioners, televisions, radios, lawn mowers, etc.). However, since this Alternative would have 50% less building footprint as compared to the proposed Project, noise impacts would be less than the proposed Project. • Public Services - With development of the Project site with 50% of the building footprint (as compared to the proposed Project), public service impacts would occur from development of these sites (need for police, fire, schools and other public facilities). However, since this Alternative would have 50% less building footprint as compared to the proposed Project, public service impacts would be less than the proposed Project.
• Transportation - With development of the Project site with 50% of the building footprint (as compared to the proposed Project), transportation impacts would occur from construction and operation (vehicles associated with the industrial development). However, since this Alternative would have 50% less building footprint as compared to the proposed Project, transportation impacts would be less than the proposed Project.
• Utilities & Service Systems - With development of the Project site with 50% of the building footprint (as compared to the proposed Project), utility and service system impacts would occur from construction activities (water for dust control, solid waste disposal) and operational activities (water demand associated with the development, wastewater disposal, solid waste disposal). However, since 121
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
37 this Alternative would have 50% less building footprint as compared to the proposed Project, utility and service system impacts would be less than the proposed Project.
Environmentally Superior Alternative
As presented in the comparative analysis above, there are a number of factors in selecting the environmentally superior alternative. An EIR must identify the environmentally superior alternative to the project. The No Project Alternative would be environmentally superior to the Project on the basis of its minimization or avoidance of physical environmental impacts. However, CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)(2) states:
The “no project” analysis shall discuss the existing conditions at the time the notice of preparation is published, or if no notice of preparation is published, at the time environmental analysis is commenced, as well as what would be reasonably expected to occur in the foreseeable future if the project were not approved, based on current plans and consistent with available infrastructure and community services. If the environmentally superior alternative is the “no project” alternative, the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives.
Because the No Project Alternative cannot be the Environmentally Superior Alternative under CEQA, the Reduced (50%) Project Alternative would be the Environmentally Superior alternative because it would result in less adverse physical impacts to the environment with regard to air, water, noise, public services, population/housing, utilities and traffic. However, the Reduced (50%) Project Alternative does not eliminate the proposed Project’s significant and unavoidable impacts associated with Agriculture - Loss of Farmland (project and cumulative). Furthermore, the Reduced (50%) Project Alternative does not meet all of the Project objectives, particularly with providing an economically sustainable industrial complex.
Summary and Determination
Only the No Project and Reduced Project Alternatives could potentially result in fewer impacts than the proposed Project’s impacts. These Alternatives however, would not meet the objectives of the proposed Project. After this full, substantial, and deliberate analysis, the proposed Project remains the preferred alternative.
5.7 Growth-Inducing Impacts
Section 15126.2(d) of the CEQA Guidelines requires than at EIR evaluate the growth-inducing impacts of a proposed action. A growth-inducing impacts is defined by the CEQA Guidelines as:
122
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
38 The way in which a proposed project could foster economic or population growth or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. Included in this are projects which would remove obstacles to population growth… it is not assumed that growth in an area is necessarily beneficial, detrimental, or of little significance to the environment.
Based on the State CEQA Guidelines, growth inducement is any growth that exceeds planned growth of an area and results in new development that would not have taken place without implementation of the Project. A project can have direct and/or indirect growth inducement potential. Direct growth inducement would result if a project, for example, involved construction of new housing. A project would have indirect growth inducement potential if it established substantial new permanent employment opportunities or if it would involve a construction effort with substantial short-term employment opportunities that would indirectly stimulate the need for additional housing and services to support the new employment demand. Similarly, a project would indirectly induce growth if it would remove an obstacle to additional growth and development, such as removing a constraint on a required public service. A project providing an increased water supply in an area where water service historically limited growth could be considered growth-inducing.
The State Guidelines further explain that the environmental effects of induced growth are considered indirect impacts of the proposed action. These indirect impacts or secondary effects of growth include increased demand on other community and public services and infrastructure, increased traffic and noise, and adverse environmental impacts such as degradation of air and water quality, degradation or loss of plant and animal habitat, and conversion of agricultural and open space land to developed uses.
Growth inducement may constitute an adverse impact if the growth is not consistent with or accommodated by the land use plans and growth management plans and policies for the area affected.
Local land use plans provide for land use development patterns and growth policies that allow for the orderly expansion of urban development supported by adequate urban public services, such as water supply, roadway infrastructure, sewer service, and solid waste service.
This discussion includes consideration of ways in which the proposed Project could directly or indirectly foster economic or population growth with the expansion of an existing industrial park development project in the surrounding area. Projects which could remove obstacles to population growth (such as a major public service expansion) are also considered in this discussion.
The proposed Project is the establishment of an industrial complex project. It is consistent with the City of Woodlake’s General Plan and Zone District with the approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the land use from Urban Reserve to Light Industrial and Conditional Use Permit to accommodate the cannabis cultivation, manufacturing, retail, testing and distribution. 123
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
39 The proposed Project would create a relatively minor amount of new employment opportunities during both construction and operational phases; however, those positions would likely be readily filled by the existing employment base, given the 8.0% unemployment rate in the Visalia-Porterville Metropolitan statistical area. This compares with an unemployment rate of 3.9% for California and
3.7% for the nation3 during the same time period. There are no other aspects of the Project (such as creation of oversized utility lines, etc.) that would induce further growth in the area. As such, the proposed Project would not result in significant growth-inducing impacts.
5.8 Statement of Overriding Considerations
Public Resources Code Section 21081 mandates that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been certified that identifies one or more significant effects on the environment that would occur if the Project is approved or carried out unless the following occur:
• The public agency makes one or more of the following findings with respect to each significant impact:
o Changes or alternatives have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant impacts on the environment. o Those changes or alternatives are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. o Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the EIR. o With respect to the third point, the public agency finds that specific overriding economic, legal, social and technological, or other benefits of the Project outweigh the significant impact on the environment.
As discussed in Subsection 5.4, significant impacts were identified, but mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant impacts on the environment.
Additionally, as discussed in Subsection 5.5, there were significant and unavoidable impacts that could not be mitigated to a less than significant level.
Accordingly, the Woodlake City Council adopts this Statement of Overriding Considerations with respect to the significant unavoidable impacts associated with adoption of the Project as addressed in the EIR, specifically for the following impact areas:
124
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
40 Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Impact AG-1: The Project would convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use.
Impact 3.3-1 (Cumulative Level): The Project would convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use at the cumulative level.
The City Council hereby declares that, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the City Council has balanced the benefits of the Project against any significant and unavoidable environmental impacts in determining whether to approve the Project. If the benefits of the Project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts, those impacts are considered “acceptable”.
The City Council hereby declares that the EIR has identified and discussed significant effects that may occur as a result of the Project. With the implementation of the mitigation measures discussed in the EIR, these impacts can be mitigated to a level of less than significant except for the unavoidable and significant impacts discussed in Subsection 5.5, herein.
The City Council hereby declares that it has made a reasonable and good faith effort to eliminate or substantially mitigate the potential impacts resulting from the Project.
The City Council hereby declares that to the extent any mitigation measures recommended to the City are not to be incorporated, such mitigation measures are infeasible because they would impose restrictions on the Project that would prohibit the realization of specific economic, social, and other benefits that this City Council finds outweigh the unmitigated impacts.
The City Council further finds that except for the Project, all other alternatives set forth in the EIR are infeasible because they may not substantially reduce environmental impacts associated with the Project, and would prohibit the realization of the Project objectives and/or specific economic, social, or other benefits that this City Council finds outweigh any environmental benefits of the alternatives.
The City Council hereby declares that, having reduced the adverse significant environmental effects of the Project, to the extent feasible by adopting the proposed mitigation measures, having considered the entire administrative record on the Project and having weighted the benefits of the Project against its unavoidable significant impact after mitigation, the City Council has determined that the social, economic, and environmental benefits of the Project outweigh the potential unavoidable significant 125
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
41 impacts and render those potential significant impacts acceptable based on the following considerations:
• The Project reflects the stated vision, goals and objectives of the City of Woodlake. • The Project will ensure orderly development patterns to accommodate projected increases in population through buildout of the General Plan by providing strategic land use designations that avoid or minimize land use conflicts.
• The Project will create an economically sustainable industrial complex that will provide business and job opportunities within the City of Woodlake • The Project will maximize and broaden the City’s sales tax base by providing local and regional tax-generating uses.
• The Project will improve and maximize economic viability of the Project site and area by providing strategic land use designations.
As the CEQA Lead Agency for the proposed action, the City of Woodlake has carefully reviewed the Project and the alternatives presented in the EIR, and fully understands the Project and Project alternatives proposed for development. Further, this City Council finds that all potential adverse environmental impacts and all feasible mitigation measures to reduce the impacts from the Project have been identified in the Draft EIR, the Final EIR and public testimony. This City Council also finds that a reasonable range of alternatives was considered in the EIR and this document, Section 5.6, above, and finds that approval of the Project is appropriate.
In Section 5.8, the City Council has identified economic and social benefits and important policy objectives that will result from implementing the Project. The City Council has balanced these substantial social and economic benefits against the unavoidable significant adverse effects of the Project. Given the substantial social and economic benefits that will accrue from the Project, this City Council finds that these specific overriding benefits of the Project outweigh the significant impact on the environment.
Public Resource Code 21002 provides, “In the event specific economic, social and other conditions make infeasible such Project alternatives or such mitigation measures, individual projects can be approved in spite of one or more significant effects thereof”. Section 21002(c) provides, “In the event that economic, social, or other conditions make it infeasible to mitigate one or more significant effects of a project on the environment, the project may nonetheless be approved or carried out at the discretion of a public agency”.
126
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
42 Finally, California Administrative Code, Title 4, 15093(a) states, “If the benefits of a Project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered “acceptable”.
The City Council hereby declares that the foregoing benefits provided to the public through approval and implementation of the Project outweigh the identified significant adverse environmental impacts of the Project that cannot be mitigated. The City Council finds that each of the Project benefits outweighs the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts identified in the EIR, and finds those impacts to be acceptable.
6.0 Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report
6.1 Findings
The City Council finds that it has reviewed and considered the EIR in evaluating the Project, that the EIR is an accurate and objective statement that fully complies with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and that the EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City Council. The City Council declares that no new significant information as defined by State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 has been received by the City Council after the circulation of the Draft EIR that would require recirculation. All of the information added to the Final EIR merely clarifies, amplifies, or makes insignificant modifications to an already adequate Draft EIR pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5(b). The City Council hereby certifies the EIR based on the following findings and conclusions.
CEQA Compliance
As the decision-making body for the Project, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Findings and supporting documentation. The City Council determines that the Findings contain a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts and mitigation measures associated with the Project, as well as complete and accurate reporting of the unavoidable impacts and benefits of the Project as detailed in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. The City Council finds that the EIR was prepared in compliance with CEQA and that the City Council complied with CEQA’s procedural and substantive requirements.
Significant Unavoidable Impacts / Statement of Overriding Considerations The Project will have significant adverse impacts even following adoption of all feasible mitigation measures which are required by the City Council. As set forth in Section 5.5 of these Findings, the significant environmental impacts have been identified in the Final EIR and no feasible mitigation 127
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park EIR | Findings/SOC
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
43 measures are available to reduce these impacts to a level of insignificance. The City Council has eliminated or substantially reduced environmental impacts where feasible as described in the Findings, and the City Council determines that the remaining unavoidable significant adverse impacts are acceptable due to the reasons set forth in the preceding Statement of Overriding Considerations.
Conclusions
All potentially significant environmental impacts from implementation of the Project have been identified in the Final EIR and, with the implementation of the mitigation measures defined herein and set forth in the MMRP, will be mitigated to a less than significant level, except for the impacts identified in Section 5.5, above. Other reasonable alternatives to the Project that could feasibly achieve the basic objectives of the Project have been considered and rejected in favor of the Project.
Environmental, economic, social, and other considerations and benefits derived from the development of the Project override and make infeasible any alternatives to the Project or further mitigation measures beyond those incorporated into the Project.
7.0 Adoption of Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City Council hereby adopts, as conditions of approval of the Project, the MMRP. In the event of any inconsistencies between the mitigation measures as set forth herein and the MMRP, the MMRP shall control except to the extent that a mitigation measure contained herein is inadvertently omitted from the MMRP, in which case such mitigation measure shall be deemed as if it were included in the MMRP. 128
FINAL FOCUSED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT
Woodlake Holdings
Industrial Park
January 2024
PREPARED BY:
Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
113 N. Church Street, Suite 310
Visalia, CA 93291
PREPARED FOR:
City of Woodlake
350 N. Valencia Avenue
Woodlake, California 93286
129
Final Focused Environmental Impact Report
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Project
Prepared for:
City of Woodlake
350 N. Valencia Avenue
Woodlake, California 93286
(559) 564-8055
Contact: Emmanuel Llamas, Community Development Director Prepared by:
Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
113 N. Church Street, Suite 310
Visalia, CA 93291
(559) 840-4414
Contact: Emily Bowen, LEED AP
January 2024
State Clearinghouse Number: 2022040640
130
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER ONE - Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 CEQA Requirements ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Use of the Final EIR ....................................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER TWO – Comments and Responses .............................................................................................. 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Comment Letter 1 .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Comment Letter 2 ........................................................................................................................................ 22 CHAPTER THREE – Text Changes to the DEIR ......................................................................................... 35 CHAPTER FOUR – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ....................................................... 36 131
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 1 CHAPTER ONE - Introduction
Introduction
This Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) contains the public and agency comments received during the public review period for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project (proposed Project), and responses to each of those comments.
This EIR is an informational document intended to disclose to the decision makers of the City of Woodlake (City) and the public the environmental consequences of approving and implementing the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project or one of the alternatives to the proposed Project, which are described in the Draft EIR. All written comments received during the public review period (May 10, 2023 through June 26, 2023) of the Draft EIR are addressed in this Final EIR.
The responses in the Final EIR clarify, correct, and/or amplify text in the Draft EIR. Also included in the Final EIR are minor text changes made at the initiative of the City (the Lead Agency) and in response to comments. The Final EIR was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code Sections 21000-21177).
Background
Notice of Preparation
The City of Woodlake circulated an Initial Study (IS) and Notice of Preparation (NOP) (referred to collectively as “NOP”) of the EIR for the proposed Project from May 4, 2022 to June 3, 2022 to trustee and responsible agencies, the State Clearinghouse (State Clearinghouse #2022040640), and the public. Following publication of the original NOP, changes were made to the proposed Project that consisted of an increase in project acreage and a change in Land Use Designation. The IS/NOP was recirculated to the public, trustee and responsible agencies, and the State Clearinghouse from October 12, 2022 to November 14, 2022. The City received three comment letters during the NOP review period. NOP letters were received from:
• California Native American Heritage Commission – Provided regulations pertaining to AB 52 and SB 18.
• California Department of Conservation – Division of Land Resource Protection: Provided regulations pertaining to conversion of farmland to urban uses. 132
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 2 • California Department of Cannabis Control – Provided information relating to role as Responsible Agency and to cannabis regulations. Also provided comments requesting project description details and general analysis requirements, in addition to a detailed table of specific comments.
Draft EIR
The Draft EIR was properly noticed and circulated for public review and comment for 45 days, from May 10, 2023 through June 26, 2023. The Notice of Availability was published in the Sun Gazette on May 10, 2023. The Draft EIR and Appendices were sent to the State Clearinghouse for distribution and notices were mailed to local agencies and other interested individuals. The City received two comment letters on the Draft EIR within the public review period. Each letter is reproduced in its entirety in Chapter Two of this Final EIR and responses are shown after each comment.
These comments and responses that make up the Final EIR, in combination with the Draft EIR, constitute the EIR that will be considered for certification by the decision makers of the City of Woodlake.
CEQA Requirements
Under CEQA, the Lead Agency must prepare and certify a Final EIR prior to a proposed project being approved. The contents of a Final EIR are specified in Section 15132 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that a Final EIR must consist of the following:
a) The Draft EIR or a revision of the Draft EIR.
b) Comments and recommendations received on the Draft EIR either verbatim or in summary.
c) A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR. d) The responses of the Lead Agency to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process.
e) Any other information added by the Lead Agency.
The Lead Agency must provide each agency that commented on the Draft EIR with a copy of the Lead Agency’s response to such comments a minimum of 10 days before certifying the Final EIR. 133
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 3 Use of the Final EIR
The Final EIR allows the public and the City an opportunity to review revisions to the Draft EIR and the responses to comments received during the Draft EIRs public review period. The Final EIR serves as the environmental document to inform the City of the environmental consequences of the proposed project, either in whole or in part, or one of the alternatives to the project discussed in the Draft EIR.
As required by Section 15090(a)(1)-(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, a Lead Agency, in certifying a Final EIR, must make the following three determinations:
1) The Final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA. 2) The Final EIR was presented to the decision-making body of the Lead Agency, and the decision-making body reviewed and considered the information in the Final EIR prior to approving the project.
3) The Final EIR reflects the Lead Agency’s independent judgement and analysis.
As required by Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines, a public agency cannot approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified that identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings (Findings of Fact) for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale to reach findings supported by substantial evidence in the record. The possible findings are as follows:
1) Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. 2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. 3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR.
Additionally, pursuant to Section 15093(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, when a Lead Agency approves a project that would result in significant unavoidable impacts that are disclosed in the Final EIR, the agency must state in writing the reasons supporting the approval. The Statement of Overriding Considerations must be supported by substantial evidence in the Lead Agency’s administrative record.
134
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 4 If the City approves the Project, and as part of that action adopts mitigation measures, the City will also adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (see Public Resources Code Section 21081.6).
135
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 5 CHAPTER TWO – Comments and Responses
Introduction
This chapter of the Final EIR contains a copy of each of the written comments received from the public and other agencies with jurisdiction over the proposed Project, followed by responses to each comment. Two comment letters were received during the public review period from the following agencies:
Comment Letter 1:
Julie A. Vance, Regional Manager
Jackson Powell, Environmental Scientist
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Central Region 1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, CA 93710
June 13, 2023
Comment Letter 2:
Lindsay Rains, Licensing Program Manager
Kevin Ponce, Senior Environmental Scientist Supervisor
CalCannabis Cultivation Licensing Division
1220 N Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
June 22, 2023
136
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 6 Comment Letter 1
Julie A. Vance, Regional Manager
Jackson Powell, Environmental Scientist
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Central Region 1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, CA 93710
June 13, 2023
137
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 7 138
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 8 139
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 9 140
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 10 141
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 11 142
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 12 143
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 13 144
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 14 145
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 15 146
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 16 147
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 17 148
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 18 149
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 19 150
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 20 Response to Comment Letter 1:
• Response to potential impacts to resources including special status species:
Pages 25-27 of the Initial Study (Appendix A of the draft EIR) include mitigation measures to address potential impacts to sensitive biological species resulting from the grounddisturbing development activities and ongoing facilities operations. Implementation of mitigation measures BIO-1 through BIO-4 reduce potential impacts to San Joaquin Kit Fox, Burrowing Owl, Pallid Bats and Western Mastiff Bats, and Nesting Birds. A site reconnaissance survey was conducted on January 13, 2022 and the written report is included in Appendix A of the NOP (Appendix A of the draft EIR). The City has determined that no further analysis is necessary.
• Response to Lake and Streambed Alteration Program:
NOP) discuss that impacts to the channelized Antelope Creek are not anticipated. The proposed Project and all developments within the site will be required to comply with existing regulatory requirements. Related potential impacts are further discussed in Section IV and Section X of the Draft EIR. The City has determined that no further analysis is necessary.
• Response to Cannabis-Specific Impacts on Biological Resources:
151
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 21
surface water will be utilized for the proposed Project and implementation is not anticipated to result in additional demands for groundwater resources beyond those considered in the adopted City of Woodlake General Plan.
Regarding Cannabis lighting use, page 16 of the Initial Study discusses how Project lighting would be regulated by Chapter 5.48 of the Woodlake Municipal Code.
Additionally, page 41 of the Initial Study states that pesticide use and handling will be regulated by current state and federal regulations. Species habitat fragmentation, degradation or loss (biological resources), and cumulative improvements were determined to be none, less than significant, or less than significant with mitigation incorporation. The City has determined that no further analysis is necessary. • Response to Editorial Comments and Suggestions regarding Nesting Birds:
The Initial Study has been revised to include suggested edits regarding nesting season and pre-construction survey timing. Please see Chapter Three of this Final EIR. 152
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 22 Comment Letter 2
Lindsay Rains, Licensing Program Manager
Kevin Ponce, Senior Environmental Scientist Supervisor
CalCannabis Cultivation Licensing Division
2920 Kilgore Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
June 22, 2023
153
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 23 154
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 24 155
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 25 156
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 26 157
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 27 158
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 28 159
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 29 160
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 30 Response to Comment Letter 2:
• Response to General Comment (GC) 1: Page 2-4 of the Draft EIR describes that the Project includes construction and operation of the industrial park, including operations related to cannabis cultivation. Additionally, Page 2-4 and page 49 (Ch XI. Land Use and Planning) include obtaining a Conditional Use Permit for cannabis cultivation as part of the Project.
As such, the City feels that the Project description and land use analysis of the Draft EIR clearly specifies Project operations on the 21 subdivided parcels, including the issuance of CUPs or other regulatory permits for cannabis cultivation. Additionally, all 20 CEQArequired environmental topics were discussed and analyzed in the Initial Study and Draft EIR, including aesthetics, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, odor, recreation, public services and utilities and traffic and transportation. The City has determined that no further analysis is necessary.
161
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 31 • Response to GC 2: Page 2-1 to 2-5 of the Draft EIR describes the Project at full build out as a 113-acre industrial center across four land parcels that will house 17 buildings with various industrial uses allowable by the zone district, including cannabis cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, testing and retail, which is allowable with a Conditional Use Permit. More specifically, those same pages describe the Project as including the following Project components:
o Constructing and operating an industrial park with seventeen buildings ranging in size of 75,000 sf to 87,000 sf for a total of up to 1,500,000 sf of industrial space o Approval of Tentative Parcel Map to divide the existing parcel into 21 separate parcels
As it is unknown at this time, whether the parcels will be developed with cannabis related facilities or with other industrial uses allowable within the zone district, the analysis presented in the document assumes full buildout of 1,500,000 square feet of industrial space (see Page 2-4 of the Draft EIR). All operations, cannabis or other, would take place within the 1,500,000 square feet of space. Page 2-5 of the Draft Focused EIR further discusses that operations will take place from 7am to 6pm Monday through Friday.
Potential energy impacts are discussed in Section VI of the Draft EIR, hazardous materials are discussed in Section IX of the Draft EIR, and water impacts are discussed in Section X of the Draft EIR. Mitigation measures have been included in the Initial Study and the Draft EIR which will be certified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and will be applicable to all development that will occur at the Project site. The City has determined that no further analysis is necessary.
As such, the City feels that the scope of the Draft Focused EIR clearly specifies that full buildout of operations on the subdivided 21 parcels, including the issuance of CUPs or other entitlements, and operating permits, have been analyzed in the Draft Focused EIR and no further clarification is necessary.
• Response to GC 3: As discussed in the response to GC 1 and GC 2, the EIR covers all development that will occur within the 1,500,000 square feet of available industrial space.
All 20 CEQA-required environmental topics were discussed and analyzed in the Initial Study and Draft EIR. Footnotes were included throughout the Initial Study and Draft EIR to guide the reader to the source of information. Assumptions utilized for estimating criteria pollutant, energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions are clearly stated on page 162
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 32 3-48, 3-52, and Appendix B and Appendix C of the Draft EIR and the Traffic Study provided in Appendix D of the Draft EIR provides the assumptions utilized for traffic modeling.
Additionally, the proposed Project and all developments within the site will comply with City of Woodlake Ordinance 611 and 612 applicable for commercial cannabis businesses.
Specifically, Section 5.48.030 of Ordinance no. 611 contains minimum operational requirements for cannabis businesses, including use of chemicals, perimeter lighting, and odor control. 1 The City has determined that no further analysis is necessary for the proposed Project.
• Response to GC 4: This comment is not relevant as the City will not require subsequent site-specific environmental assessments. This document covers CEQA compliance for the entire 1,500,000 square foot development. The City has determined that no further analysis is necessary.
The City is happy to provide a copy of the final Focused EIR to DCC. The City will include DCC in the Reviewing Agencies Checklist and will provide future tenants a copy of the signed Notice of Determination and Final EIR so cannabis applications can include them with their application package submitted to DCC.
• Response to GC 5: As discussed in the Initial Study and Draft EIR, the Project’s potential environmental impacts to aesthetics, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions, biological resources, cultural resources, hazardous and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, utilities and service systems, energy and cumulative improvements were determined to be none, less than significant, or less than significant with mitigation incorporation.
Additionally, as discussed in Chapter 4 Project Alternatives of the Draft EIR, “CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6 requires the consideration of a range of reasonable alternatives to the proposed project that could feasibly attain most of the objectives of the proposed project.”
The following alternatives were analyzed as part of the Draft EIR:
1 Ordinance No. 611, City of Woodlake. https://www.cityofwoodlake.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Item-V.A-CannabisRegulations-Ordinance-August-9_1.pdf. Accessed October, 2023. 163
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 33 o No Project
o Alternate Location
o Reduced (50%) Project
In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(d), each alternative is evaluated in sufficient detail to determine whether the overall environmental impacts would be less, similar, or greater than the corresponding impacts of the Project. A matrix summarizing the comparison of major characteristics and significant environmental effects of each alternative can be found on page 4-13 and 4-14 of the Draft EIR. As noted on page 4-15, only the No Project and Reduced Project Alternatives could potentially result in fewer impacts than the proposed Project’s impacts. These Alternatives however, would not meet the objectives of the proposed Project. After this full, substantial, and deliberate analysis, the proposed Project remains the preferred alternative. As such, the City did not feel that additional analysis was necessary to further reduce potential impacts. • The City appreciates the DCC regulations and notes that projects obtaining permits from DCC will be in compliance with the stated regulations that will further reduce potential environmental impacts.
• Response to Specific Comment (SC) 1: A description of the AB compliance process is included in Section XVIII – Tribal Cultural Resources (pages 63-65) of the Initial Study. • Response to SC 2: As described in the Project description, the Project includes the construction of 17 buildings of varying square footages which will house industrial uses allowable by the zone district. Cultivation will take place within these buildings and lighting will be regulated by City of Woodlake Ordinance 611 and 612 applicable for commercial cannabis businesses. Specifically, Section 5.48.030 of Ordinance no. 611 contains minimum operational requirements for cannabis lighting. • Response to SC 3 and 4: A Biological Resource Evaluation (BRE) was prepared by Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC in January of 2022. The BRE discussed the project as a whole, including potential construction and operational impacts and potential impacts to Antelope Creek. The BRE was included in the Initial Study as Appendix A. • Response to SC 5: Section 3.3 of the draft EIR discusses the energy regulatory climate in addition to the estimated energy consumption of the Project. Page 3.74 of the draft EIR discusses how the cannabis production operations will be in compliance with building energy efficiency standards as well as other applicable building and energy codes. 164
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 34 • Response to SC 6 and 7: As discussed in Section IX Hazards and Hazardous Materials (pages 40-43) of the Initial Study, no hazardous materials other than common commercial grade hazardous materials, such as household and commercial cleaners, paint, etc. will be used during Project operations. Page 41 of the Initial Study discusses how transportation, storage, use and disposal of hazardous materials will be in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local statues and regulations.
• Response to SC 8 and 10: The Project is within the planning area and limits of the City of Woodlake. As stated on page 47 of the Initial Study, the proposed Project is not anticipated to result in additional demands for groundwater resources beyond those considered in the adopted City of Woodlake General Plan.
• Response to SC 9: As stated on page 54 of the Initial Study, the most prominent noise generated by Project operations will be from vehicles traveling to and from the site. All operational noise, however, will be subject to the City’s noise and nuisance ordinances. 165
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 35 CHAPTER THREE – Text Changes to the DEIR
Based on a comment from CDFW, the following text supersedes the text of the DEIR:
Nesting Bird Editorial Comments – Mitigation Measure BIO-4 (page 27 of the Initial Study) has been changed as follows:
“Protect Nesting Birds
1. To the extent practicable, construction shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season, which extends from February through August September 15.
2. If it is not possible to schedule construction between September 16 and January, preconstruction surveys for nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to ensure that no active nests will be disturbed during the implementation of the Project. A preconstruction survey shall be conducted no more than 14 10 days prior to the initiation of construction activities. During this survey, the qualified biologist shall inspect all potential nest substrates in and immediately adjacent to the impact areas. If an active nest is found close enough to the construction area to be disturbed by these activities, the qualified biologist shall determine the extent of a construction-free buffer to be established around the nest. If work cannot proceed without disturbing the nesting birds, work may need to be halted or redirected to other areas until nesting and fledging are completed or the nest has otherwise failed for non-construction related reasons.” 166
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park | Final EIR
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. Page | 36 CHAPTER FOUR – Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program
State law requires that a public agency adopt a monitoring program for mitigation measures that have been incorporated into the approved project to reduce or avoid significant effects on the environment. The purpose of the monitoring program is to ensure compliance with environmental mitigation during project implementation and operation. Since there are potentially significant impacts requiring mitigation associated with the project, a Mitigation Monitoring Program is included herein on the following pages.
167
Environmental Impact Report
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. MMRP-1 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
Biological Resources
BIO-1 To protect San Joaquin kit fox, a
qualified biologist shall conduct a
pre-construction survey within 30
days prior to the start of grounddisturbing activities to identify potential dens (burrows larger
than 4 inches in diameter) in
suitable land cover types on and
within 250 feet of the Project site.
If potential dens for San Joaquin
kit fox are present, their
disturbance and destruction shall
be avoided. Exclusion zones shall
be implemented based on the
type of den and current use:
Potential Den—50 feet; Known
Den—100 feet; Natal or Pupping
Den—to be determined on a
case-by-case basis in
coordination with USFWS and
CDFW. All pipes greater than 4
inches in diameter stored on the
construction site shall be capped,
Prior to
Construction
Verification by
City and
Construction
Contractor
City of
Woodlake
and
Construction
Contractor
168
Environmental Impact Report
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. MMRP-2 and exit ramps shall be installed in
trenches and other excavations
to avoid direct mortality. When
possible, construction shall be
conducted outside of the
breeding season from October 1
to November 30. If den
avoidance is not possible,
procedures in U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Standardized
Recommendations for Protection
of the Endangered San Joaquin
Kit Fox Prior or During Ground
Disturbance (USFWS 2011) shall be
followed.
BIO-2 Conduct focused burrowing owl
surveys to assess the
presence/absence of burrowing
owl in accordance with the Staff
Report on Burrowing Owl
Mitigation (CDFG 2012) and
Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol
and Mitigation Guidelines (CBOC
1997). These involve conducting
four pre-construction survey visits.
If a burrowing owl or sign of
burrowing owl use (e.g., feathers,
guano, pellets) is detected on or
within 500 feet of the Project site,
Prior to
Construction
Verification by
City and
Construction
Contractor
City of
Woodlake
and
Construction
Contractor
169
Environmental Impact Report
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. MMRP-3 and the qualified biologist
determines that Project activities
would disrupt the owl(s), a
construction-free buffer, limited
operating period, or passive
relocation shall be implemented
in consultation with the CDFW.
BIO-3 A pre-construction clearance
survey shall be conducted by a
qualified biologist to ensure that
no roosting pallid bats will be
disturbed during the
implementation of the Project. A
pre-construction clearance
survey shall be conducted no
more than 14 days prior to the
initiation of construction activities.
During this survey, the qualified
biologist shall inspect all potential
roosting habitat in and
immediately adjacent to the
impact areas. If an active roost is
found close enough to the
construction area to be disturbed
by these activities, the qualified
biologist shall determine the
extent of a construction-free
buffer to be established around
the roost. If work cannot proceed
Prior to
Construction
Verification by
City and
Construction
Contractor
City of
Woodlake
and
Construction
Contractor
170
Environmental Impact Report
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. MMRP-4 without disturbing the roosting
bats, work may need to be halted
or redirected to other areas until
the roost is no longer in use.
BIO-4 To the extent practicable,
construction shall be scheduled
to avoid the nesting season,
which extends from February
through September 15.
If it is not possible to schedule
construction between September
16 and January, pre-construction
surveys for nesting birds shall be
conducted by a qualified
biologist to ensure that no active
nests will be disturbed during the
implementation of the Project. A
pre-construction survey shall be
conducted no more than 10 days
prior to the initiation of
construction activities. During this
survey, the qualified biologist shall
inspect all potential nest
substrates in and immediately
adjacent to the impact areas. If
an active nest is found close
enough to the construction area
to be disturbed by these activities,
the qualified biologist shall
Prior to
Construction
Verification by
City and
Construction
Contractor
City of
Woodlake
and
Construction
Contractor
171
Environmental Impact Report
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. MMRP-5 determine the extent of a
construction-free buffer to be
established around the nest. If
work cannot proceed without
disturbing the nesting birds, work
may need to be halted or
redirected to other areas until
nesting and fledging are
completed or the nest has
otherwise failed for nonconstruction related reasons.
Cultural Resources
CUL-1 Should evidence of prehistoric
archeological resources be
discovered during construction,
the contractor shall halt all work
within 25 feet of the find and the
resource shall be evaluated by a
qualified archaeologist. If
evidence of any archaeological,
cultural, and/or historical deposits
is found, hand excavation and/or
mechanical excavation shall
proceed to evaluate the deposits
for determination of significance
as defined by the CEQA
guidelines. The archaeologist shall
submit reports, to the satisfaction
of the City of Woodlake,
describing the testing program
and subsequent results. These
During
construction
Verification by
City and
Construction
Contractor
City of
Woodlake
and
Construction
Contractor
172
Environmental Impact Report
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. MMRP-6 reports shall identify any program
mitigation that the project
proponent shall complete in order
to mitigate archaeological
impacts (including resource
recovery and/or avoidance
testing and analysis, removal,
reburial, and curation of
archaeological resources).
CUL-2 In order to ensure that the
proposed project does not
impact buried human remains
during project construction, the
project proponent shall be
responsible for on-going
monitoring of project
construction. Prior to the issuance
of any grading permit, the project
proponent shall provide the City
of Woodlake with documentation
identifying construction personnel
that will be responsible for on-site
monitoring. If buried human
remains are encountered during
construction, further excavation
or disturbance of the site or any
nearby area reasonably
suspected to overlie adjacent
remains shall be halted until the
Tulare County Coroner is
During
construction
Verification by
City and
Construction
Contractor
City of
Woodlake
and
Construction
Contractor
173
Environmental Impact Report
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. MMRP-7 contacted and the coroner has
made the determinations and
notifications required pursuant to
Health and Safety Code Section
7050.5. If the coroner determines
that Health and Safety Code
Section 7050.5(c) require that he
give notice to the Native
American Heritage Commission,
then such notice shall be given
within 24 hours, as required by
Health and Safety Code Section
7050.5(c). In that event, the NAHC
will conduct the notifications
required by Public Resources
Code Section 5097.98. Until the
consultations described below
have been completed, the
landowner shall further ensure
that the immediate vicinity,
according to generally accepted
cultural or archaeological
standards or practices where
Native American human remains
are located, is not disturbed by
further development activity until
the landowner has discussed and
conferred with the Most Likely
Descendants on all reasonable
options regarding the
174
Environmental Impact Report
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. MMRP-8 descendants' preferences and
treatments, as prescribed by
Public Resources Code Section
5097.98(b). The NAHC will
mediate any disputes regarding
treatment of remains in
accordance with Public
Resources Code Section
5097.94(k). The landowner shall be
entitled to exercise rights
established by Public Resources
Code Section 5097.98(e) if any of
the circumstances established by
that provision become
applicable.
Transportation/Traffic
TRA-1 The Project Developer shall be
responsible for paying its fair share
cost percentages (61.25% of a
signal located at Blair Rd &
Naranjo Blvd (SR 216)), subject to
reimbursement for the costs that
are in excess of the Project’s
equitable responsibility as
determined by the City of
Woodlake. This shall be itemized
and enforced through conditions
of approval or a development
agreement, at the discretion of
the City of Woodlake.
Prior to issuance
of grading
permit.
Verification by
City and
Construction
Contractor
City of
Woodlake
and
Construction
Contractor
175
Environmental Impact Report
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. MMRP-9 TRA-2 The Project developer shall pay a
total of $70,020 in improvement
fees, prior to issuance of building
permits, to the City of Woodlake
to improve the ramps and
sidewalks at the following
locations:
• Four (4) ADA compliant
curb ramps at Acacia
Street & W Ropes Avenue
• Four (4) ADA compliant
curb ramps at S Palm
Street & W Ropes Avenue
• Two (2) ADA compliant
curb ramps at S Pepper
Street & Ropes Avenue
• Four (4) ADA compliant
curb ramps at S Acacia
Street & W Bravo Avenue
• 295’ of sidewalk on the
south side of W Ropes
Avenue between Mulberry
Street & Acacia St
• 305’ of sidewalk on the
north side of W Ropes
Avenue between S
Pepper Street & S Palm
Street
Prior to issuance
of grading
permit.
Verification by
City and
Construction
Contractor
City of
Woodlake
and
Construction
Contractor
176
Environmental Impact Report
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
CITY OF WOODLAKE | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. MMRP-10 • 285’ of sidewalk on the
south side of W Ropes
Avenue between S
Acacia Street & S Palm
Street
These fees are subject to
reimbursement for the costs that
are in excess of the Project’s
equitable responsibility as
determined by the City of
Woodlake. This shall be itemized
and enforced through conditions
of approval or a development
agreement, at the discretion of
the City of Woodlake.
177
City of Woodlake
AGENDA ITEM V-C
March 25, 2024
Prepared by Emmanuel Llamas, City Staff
SUBJECT:
Action: Adoption of Resolutions: Approve the Acquisition of the Lot(s) with APN No. 061-140- 069 and 061-140-070 as per Appraised Value Using PLHA Funds and Authorize the City Administrator to Execute all Necessary Documents
BACKGROUND:
The California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) released a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for approximately $195 million in funding for the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) program for Entitlement and Non-entitlement Local governments.
The intent of the program is to provide a permanent, on-going source of funding to Local governments for housing-related projects and programs that assist in addressing the unmet housing needs of their communities.
Allocations are distributed on an annual basis in response to an application defining the eligible planned use of funds for five years.
Eligible activities include:
A. Predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation and preservation of multifamily, residential live work, rental housing that is affordable to extremely low-, very low-, or moderate-income households, including necessary operating subsidies.
B. Predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of affordable rental and ownership housing, including accessory dwelling units (ADUs), that meets the needs of a growing workforce earning up to 120 percent of Area Median Income (AMI), or 150 percent of AMI in High-cost areas. ADU’s shall be available for occupancy for a term of no less than 30 days.
C. Matching portions of funds into local or regional housing trust fund.
D. Matching portions of funds available through the Low- and Moderate Housing Asset Fund pursuant to subdivision (d) of HSC Section 34176.
E. Capitalize reserves for Services connected to the preservation and creation of new permanent supportive housing.
F. Assist persons experiencing or At risk of homelessness, including, but no limited to, providing rapid rehousing, rental assistance, supportive/case management services that allow people to obtain and retain housing, operating and capital costs for navigation centers and emergency shelters, and the new construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of permeant and transitional housing.
G. Accessibility modifications in Lower-income Owner-occupied housing.
H. Efforts to acquire and rehabilitate foreclosed or vacant homes and apartments.
I. Homeownership opportunities, including, but not limited to, down payment assistance. 178
J. Fiscal incentives made by a county to a city within the county to incentivize approval of one or more affordable housing projects or matching funds invested by the county in an Affordable housing development project in a city within the county, provided that the city has made an equal or greater investment in the project.
DISCUSSION:
The City’s PLHA Plan prioritizes investments that increase the supply of housing for households with incomes at or below 60% of AMI and the Plan is consistent with programs set forth in the City’s Housing Element. The City’s focus at this time is to improve the condition of affordable housing stock through the acquisition of infill lots that will promote affordable single-family housing in the City.
The City of Woodlake has received the following allocations:
2020 PLHA allocation $ 89,885
2021 PLHA allocation $136,424
2022 PLHA allocation $150,380
Current City of Woodlake PLHA allocation balance $376,689.
The City wishes to use its current PLHA to purchase the following lot(s) with APN No. 061-140- 069 and 061-140-070 as per appraised value. The lots will be purchased from the City of Woodlake’s General Fund. Appraisal report is attached for review.
Lot 7. APN No. 061-140-069 - $80,000 appraised value
Lot 8. APN No. 061-140-070 - $90,000 appraised value
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Authorize the acquisition of the lot(s) with APN No. 061-140-069 and 061-140-070 as per appraised value using PLHA funds and authorize the City Administrator to execute all necessary documents.
FISCAL IMPACT:
All costs associated with the City of Woodlake’s PLHA Program will be covered by grant funding. The PLHA funds will cover the land acquisition and escrow costs.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution: Approve the Acquisition of the Lot(s) with APN No. 061-140-069 and 061- 140-070 as per Appraised Value Using PLHA Funds and Authorize the City Administrator to Execute all Necessary Documents
2. Attachment No. 1 - PLHA Plan
3. Attachment No. 2 – Property Appraisal Report
4. Attachment No. 3 – APN Map
179
Resolution 24-
CITY OF WOODLAKE
AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION
[All, or A necessary quorum and majority] of the council members of the City of Woodlake, a municipality (“Applicant”) hereby consents to, adopts and ratifies the following resolution:
A. WHEREAS, the Department is authorized to provide up to $195 million under the SB 2 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program Formula Component from the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund for assistance to Cities and Counties (as described in Health and Safety Code section 50470 et seq. (Chapter 364, Statutes of 2017 (SB 2)).
B. WHEREAS the State of California (the “State”), Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) issued a Notice of Funding Availability (“NOFA”) dated 02/26/2020 under the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program;
C. WHEREAS the City was an eligible Local government who applied for the program to administer one or more eligible activities, or a Local or Regional Housing Trust Fund to whom an eligible Local government delegated its PLHA formula allocation and was authorized and directed to receive a PLHA grant, in an amount not to exceed the fiveyear estimate of the PLHA formula allocations, as stated in Appendix C of the current NOFA $539,311 in accordance with all applicable rules and laws; D. WHEREAS the Department may approve funding allocations for PLHA Program, subject to the terms and conditions of the Guidelines, NOFA, Program requirements, the Standard Agreement and other contracts between the Department and PLHA grant recipients;
E. WHEREAS the City has being allocated its 2020 – 2022 PLHA allocation and has accumulated $376,689 in funding.
F. WHEREAS the City wishes to use its PLHA funds for the acquisition of the lot(s) with APN No. 061-140-069 and 061-140-070 as per appraised value using PLHA funds for the acquisition of infill lots that will promote affordable single-family housing in the City.
G. WHEREAS the City will use $170,000 in PLHA funds for the acquisition plus escrow fees associated with the two lots.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. The City has received a grant of PLHA funds from the Department pursuant to the above referenced PLHA NOFA, it represents and certifies that it will use all such funds in a manner consistent and in compliance with all applicable state and federal statutes, rules, regulations, and laws, including without limitation all rules and laws regarding the PLHA Program, as well as any and all contracts Applicant may have with the Department. 180
2. The City hereby agrees to use the PLHA funds for eligible activities as approved by the Department and in accordance with all Program requirements, Guidelines, other rules and laws, as well as in a manner consistent and in compliance with the Standard Agreement and other contracts between the City and the Department.
3. The City certifies that it was delegated by the City of Woodlake Council to submit an application on its behalf and administer the PLHA grant award for the formula allocation of PLHA funds, pursuant to Guidelines Section 300(c) and 300(d), and the legally binding agreement between the recipient of the PLHA funds and the Applicant is submitted with the PLHA application.
4. The City certifies that it has or will subgrant some or all of its PLHA funds to another entity or entities. Pursuant to Guidelines Section 302(c)(3), “entity” means a housing developer or program operator but does not mean an administering Local government to whom a Local government may delegate its PLHA allocation.
5. The City certifies that its selection process of these subgrantees was or will be accessible to the public and avoided or shall avoid any conflicts of interest.
6. Pursuant to City’s certification in this resolution, the PLHA funds will be expended only for eligible Activities and consistent with all program requirements.
7. The City shall be subject to the terms and conditions as specified in the Standard Agreement, the PLHA Program Guidelines and any other applicable SB 2 Guidelines published by the Department.
8. Ramon Lara, City Administrator is authorized to execute any documents which are related to the acquisition of properties, the Program and the PLHA grant awarded to the City, as the Department may deem appropriate.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of Woodlake Council this day of , by the following vote:
AYES: ABSTENTIONS: NOES: ABSENT:
___________________________________
Signature of Approving Officer
Rudy Mendoza, Mayor
181
CERTIFICATE OF THE ATTESTING OFFICER
The undersigned, Clerk of the City of Woodlake, Irene Zacarias, does hereby attest and certify that the [foregoing / attached] Resolution is a true, full and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at a meeting of the City of Woodlake which was duly convened and held on the date stated thereon, and that said document has not been amended, modified, repealed or rescinded since its date of adoption and is in full force and effect as of the date hereof.
ATTEST:
Signature of Attesting Officer
Irene Zacarias, City Clerk
182
CITY OF WOODLAKE
PLHA REUSE ACCOUNT PLAN
The State of California Department of Housing and Community Development has made funds available through the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program for the purpose of providing a permanent, on-going source of funding to Local governments for housing-related projects and programs that assist in addressing the unmet needs of their local communities.
The City of Woodlake as a recipient of funding under the PLHA Program is required to follow specific guidelines in the accounting for, and use of, all monies received as repayments of loan principal and/or loan interest. The City of Woodlake has formulated this document to comply with Sections 301 and 500 of the PLHA Guidelines.
Tracking of all repayments of loan principal and any loan interest is are posted in the accounting system that tracks PLHA funds separately from other funding sources. All accrued interest earned on PLHA funds shall accrue to the PLHA Reuse Account.
Funds in the reuse account shall only be used as follows:
(a) Eligible Activities are limited to one or more of the following:
(1) The predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of multifamily, residential live-work, rental housing that is Affordable to Extremely low-,Very low-, Low-, or Moderate-income households, including necessary Operating subsidies.
(2) The predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of Affordable rental and ownership housing, including Accessory dwelling units (ADUs), that meets the needs of a growing workforce earning up to 120 percent of AMI, or 150 percent of AMI in high-cost areas. ADUs shall be available for occupancy for a term of no less than 30 days.
(3) Matching portions of funds placed into Local or Regional Housing Trust Funds. (4) Matching portions of funds available through the Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Fund pursuant to subdivision (d) of HSC Section 34176. (5) Capitalized Reserves for Services connected to the preservation and creation of new Permanent supportive housing.
(6) Assisting persons who are experiencing or At risk of homelessness, including, but not limited to, providing rapid rehousing, rental assistance, supportive/case management services that allow people to obtain and retain housing, operating and capital costs for navigation centers and emergency shelters, and the new construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of permanent and transitional housing. 183
(A) This Activity may include sub-awards to Administrative Entities as defined in HSC Section 50490(a)(1-3) that were awarded CESH program or HEAP funds for rental assistance to continue assistance to these households. (B) Applicants must provide rapid rehousing, rental assistance, navigation centers, emergency shelter, and transitional housing activities in a manner consistent with the Housing First practices described in 25 CCR, Section 8409, subdivision (b)(1)-(6) and in compliance with WIC Section 8255(b)(8). An Applicant allocated funds for the new construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of Permanent supportive housing shall incorporate the core components of Housing First, as provided in WIC Section 8255, subdivision (b). (7) Accessibility modifications in Lower-income Owner-occupied housing. (8) Efforts to acquire and rehabilitate foreclosed or vacant homes and apartments. (9) Homeownership opportunities, including, but not limited to, down payment assistance.
(10) Fiscal incentives made by a county to a city within the county to incentivize approval of one or more Affordable housing Projects, or matching funds invested by a county in an Affordable housing development Project in a city within the county, provided that the city has made an equal or greater investment in the Project. The county fiscal incentives shall be in the form of a grant or low-interest loan to an Affordable housing Project. Matching funds investments by both the county and the city also shall be a grant or low-interest deferred loan to the Affordable housing Project.
(b) A Local government that receives an allocation shall use no more than 5 percent of the allocation for costs related to the administration of the Activity(ies) for which the allocation was made. Staff and overhead costs directly related to carrying out the eligible activities described in Section 301 are “activity costs” and not subject to the cap on “administrative costs.” A Local government may share any funds available for administrative costs with entities that are administering its allocation.
(c) Two or more Local governments that receive PLHA allocations may expend those moneys on an eligible jointly funded project as provided for in Section 50470 (b)(2)(B)(ii)(IV). An eligible jointly funded project must be an eligible Activity pursuant to Section 301(a) and be located within the boundaries of one of the Local governments. (d) Entitlement Local governments may use the flow of PLHA funds to incentivize private lender loans and to guarantee payments for some or all public agency bond financings for activities consistent with the uses identified in Section 301 “Eligible Activities”. This loan guarantee Activity must be identified and fully explained in the Applicant’s “Plan”.
Any loan funds not expended at completion of an individual homeowner transaction will be deposited into the Reuse Account, will be considered a “principal reduction”, and will 184
be applied to the principal loan balance, thereby reducing the amount owed by the borrower. Borrowers will receive a closeout letter after the 30-day retention period indicating the amount of their Note, the credit, and the ending balance on their loan. A copy of this credit along with the final cost break-down will be retained in the borrowers file.
185
APPRAISAL RE
LAKEVIEW ESTATES LOTS
Nine Vacant Residential Lots
Southwest Corner Lakeview Ave. & Pomegranate St.
Woodlake, California
Date of Value:
March 7,2024
Clie nt:
City of Woodlake
HopperCompany
ORT
',*i;*rgffi+
. -l,rL=
Reat Propefi Valuation
186
HopperCompany
RealPropefi Valuation
March t4,2024
Ramon Lara, City Administrator
City of Woodlake
350 North Valencia Boulevard
Woodlake, California 93286
RE: Appraisol of nine vocont residentiol lots in the Lokeview Estotes subdivision, in Woodlake, Colifornio Our file no. 24-022.
Dear Mr. Lara:
I am pleased to transmit the attached appraisal report, which communicates my opinion of value for the nine vacant residential lots that form the Lakeview Estates subdivision. The tract is located at the southwest corner of Lakeview Avenue and Pomegranate Street, in Woodlake, California. The property is owned by the City of Woodlake, who has recently cleared the site of former improvements and recorded a new subdivision map to create the lots.
The City of Woodlake is now pursuing grant funding and needs an appraisal of the lots for their internal analysisanddecision-makingprocess. TheCityistheclientfortheassignmentandtheyhaveorderedthe attached appraisal.
The purpose of the appraisal is to provide an opinion of market value forthe fee simple interest in each of the lots as of March 7,2024. Lots 2 through 8 are currently in a buildable condition and are valued in their "as-is" condition, while Lots 1 and 9 require some work to correct their drainage and they are valued based on the hypotheticalcondition that this work has been completed and that the lots are already in a buildable condition on the effective date of value. All of the value conclusions are current value estimates.
After considering the available facts and information for the subject property, it is my opinion that current market value for the fee simple interest in each of the subject lots as of March 7 ,2024 is as follows:
Lot L - APN 061,-140-063 (hypothetical condition)
Lot 2 - APN 06L-140-064 ("as-is" condition)
Lot 3 - APN 061-140-065 ("as-is" condition)
Lot 4 - APN 051-140-066 ("as-is" condition)
Lot 5 - APN 061-140-067 ("as-is" condition)
Lot 6 - APN 061-1-40-068 ("as-is" condition)
Lot 7 - APN 06L-140-069 ("as-is" condition)
Lot 8 - APN 061-140-070 ("as-is" condition)
Lot 9 - APN 061-140-071 (hypothetical condition)
Serving the Son looquin Volley since 7972.
1041 N. Demaree St. r Visalia, CA 93291 r Phone (559) 733-1230 r www.hopperco'com s85,ooo
S8o,ooo
s8o,ooo
s8o,ooo
S8o,ooo
$8o,ooo
s8o,ooo
$go,ooo
S85,ooo
187
Hopper Company
These market value conclusions represent the most probable prices for the specified interest in each of the subject lots. lt is assumed thatthe lots have received adequate, sufficient, and reasonable exposure to the market prior to the effective date of value for this appraisal, and the values correspond to an estimated exposure time of approximately three to six months.
Any reader of the attached report is cautioned to understand the limited purpose for which it has been prepared. Reliance upon the information, data, or conclusions provided in the report by anyone other than the client, or for any reason other than the intended use that is stated, is inappropriate. This letter simply transmits the attached appraisal report and it should not be considered the report itself.
Thank you for this assignment. lf you have any questions about the valuation or written appraisal report, please contact me.
Sincerely,
@rrfu
Renee E. Hendrick, MAl, R/W-AC, ARA
CA #AG040264 (expires 5/1.1/20241
188
INTRODUCTION TO
THE APPRAISAL
HopperCompany
ReaI Propefty Vafuation
189
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 1,
THE APPRAISAL PROBLEM
Subiect Propertv: Lots L through 9 of Lakeview Estates
Southwest Corner of Lakeview Avenue and Pomegranate Street Woodlake, California 93286
Date of Value:
Date of Appraisal Report:
Client for the Assignment City of Woodlake
350 North Valencia Boulevard
Woodlake, California 93286
Other lntended Users: None
Purpose & Use of the Appraisal: The purpose of the appraisal is to provide an opinion of current marketvalueforthefeesimpleinterestineachof thesubjectlotsasof March7,2024. Lots2through8 are valued in their "as-is" conditions as buildable lots, while Lots l and 9 are valued based on the hypotheticalcondition that work has been done to give them proper drainage and that they are also in a buildable condition on the date of value. All of the value conclusions are current value estimates. The appraisal will be used to by the City of Woodlake for their internal analysis and decision-making related to possible grant funding.
Standards Adhered To: This appraisal has been prepared in compliance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) of the Appraisal Foundation and the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of ProfessionalAppraisal Practice of the Appraisal lnstitute.
Report Tvpe: The results of the appraisal process are communicated in this narrative-style appraisal report that provides a concise presentation of the important facts and information having an impact on the value of the subject property. The report is intended to company with USPAP Standards Rule 2-2.
Statement of Competencv: The appraiser who has prepared and signed this appraisal report is competent to value this type of property and is qualified under the competency rule of the USPAP. A detailedlistoftheappraiser'squalificationsisshownintheaddendaofthisreport. Nooneelseprovided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report.
Copvrieht Protection This appraisal report is a copyrighted work and neither all nor any part of this document may be copied, reproduced, transmitted, or incorporated into any information retrievalsysteminanyformorbyanymeanswithouttheexpresswrittenpermissionoftheauthor. The descriptions, data, analyses, opinions, and conclusions contained herein are intended for the exclusive use of the client and the other intended users that are identified in this report, and are to be used solely for the intended use that is stated. The Hopper Company retains allownership of this work and the client and other intended users are simply granted a license to use the work for the intended use. O Copyright 2024by the Hopper Company. All Rights Reserved.
March 7,2024
March 14,2024
190
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 2
DEFINITIONS OF TERMS
The following terms are used throughout this appraisal report Appraisal: The act or process of developing an opinion of value; an opinion ofvalue(noun). Oforpertainingtoappraisingandrelatedfunctionssuchasappraisal practiceorappraisal services (adjective). (lJniform Stqndards of Professional Approisol Practice, Appraisal Foundation,2024 edition, pg.3).
Client: The party or parties (i.e., individual, group, or entity) who engage an appraiser by employment or contract in a specific assignment, whether directly or through an agent. (tJniform Stondords of Professional Appraisol Proctice, Appraisal Foundation, 2024 edition, pg. 4).
Report: Any communication, written or oral, of an appraisal or appraisal review that is transmitted to the client or a party authorized by the client upon completion of an assignment. Two types of reports may be written under USPAP: Appraisal Report or Restricted Appraisal Report. (lJniform Stondards of Professional Appraisal Practice, Appraisal Foundation, 2024 edition, pg. 5).
Real Estate or Real Propertv: Real estate is an identified parcel or tract of land, including improvements,ifany. Real propertyistheinterests,benefits,andrightsinherentintheownershipofreal estate. (lJniform Standards of Professionol Approisol Proctice, Appraisal Foundation, 2024 edition, pg. 5).
MarketValue: The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self-interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress. (The Dictionory of Reot Estote Approisal, Sth edition, Appraisal lnstitute, 20L5, pg. 1.4L1.
MarketValue "As-ls": The estimate of the market value of real property in its current physical condition, use, and zoning as of the appraisal dale. (The Dictionory of Reol Estate Approisol,Tth edition, Appraisal lnstitute, 2022, pg.lO\.
tm le lnterest Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat. (The Dictionary of Reol Estote Approisol,Tth edition, Appraisal lnstitute,2022, pc. 73).
Exposure Time: An opinion, based on supporting market data, of the length of time that the property interest being appraised would have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the appraisal. (Uniform Standards of Professionol Approisol Practice, Appraisal Foundation, 2024 edition, pg. 4). Exposure time is a retrospective opinion based on an analysis of past events assuming a competitive and open market, and when it is a component of the definition of value appraisers must develop an opinion of exposure time that is linked to the value opinion.
191
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 3
SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE ASSIGNMENT
ln preparing this appraisal, this scope of work was followed:
o The appraisal was ordered by Ramon Lara, City Administrator for the City of Woodlake. He indicated the need forthe appraisaland authorized the assignment by electronic mail. o A personal inspection of the subject property and its surrounding neighborhood area was made by the appraiser on March 7,2024. The inspection included viewing the subject lots from the fronting roadways and various places on the sites, taking detailed notes about lot conditions, and photographing the parcels.
o lnvestigations were made into the applicable zoning and other land use restrictions impacting the use and development of the property.
o Conversations were held with Ramon Lara regarding the drainage ditch that runs through Lots L and 9 and the City of Woodlake's plan to pipe the ditch and make the lots buildable prior to selling them.
o Zoning was verified with Emmanuel Llamas, Community Development Director for the City of Woodlake. He provided a resolution that was passed the City Council in May 2023 that changed the zoning from high-density residential to low-density residential. o Comparable market data has been gathered and confirmed. o The comparable data has been analyzed and the sales comparison approach to value is applied.
o The results of the appraisal process are then communicated in this narrative-style appraisal report that provides a concise presentation of the important facts and information having an impact on the value of the subject lots.
ASSU M PTIO N S AN D LI M ITI NG CON DITIO N S
The assumptions and limiting conditions listed below are centralto this appraisal. The list includes basic assumptions and limiting conditions that are typical of many appraisal assignments as well as any extraordinary assumptions or hypothetical conditions that are specific to the subject property and this assignment. Thisappraisalshouldonlyberelieduponwithinthecontextoftheseitems.
Basic Assumptions
The information and data reported in this appraisal have been obtained from sources that are deemed to be reliable. They are believed to be correct, but cannot be guaranteed by the appraiser. Sources such as government agencies, financial institutions, attorneys, accountants, appraisers, brokers, and buyers and sellers are believed to be true and correct unless conflicting information is discovered through another source. ln cases of conflicting information, only reasonable and verifiable data is used, however, no responsibility for the accuracy of such information is assumed by the appraiser.
It is assumed that all information provided by the property owner and any persons employed by them is accurate and complete. This would include information about the subject property's t.
2 192
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 4 3 physical condition, current and past economic performance, lease agreements, condition of title, and any other items or details that could potentially impact the property's valuation.
The effective date of value that applies to the opinions expressed in this report is set forth in the appraisal. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for events, conditions, or circumstances that may subsequently arise and alter the economic or physical condition of the subject property and the opinions and conclusions stated herein.
4. No opinion as to title is rendered. Data on ownership and the legal description have been obtained from sources generally considered reliable. Title is assumed to be marketable and free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, easements, and restrictions except those specifically expressed in the report.
5. It is assumed that the property is in full compliance with all applicable zoning and use restrictions unless otherwise indicated in the report. lt is further assumed that the property is in complete compliance with all federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing environmental issues, unless otherwise indicated.
The property is appraised assuming it to be under responsible ownership and competent management. lt is assumed that all required licenses, consents, and other legislative or administrative authority have been or can be obtained for any use on which the value estimate contained in this report has been based.
No encroachment of real property improvements is known to exist, and it is assumed that the utilization of the land and any improvements is within the boundaries of the property lines of the property described in this report, unless otherwise indicated.
It is assumed, unless indicated to the contrary in this report, that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoils, or any structures that would render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions, and any reports provided to the appraiser by experts in these matters are accepted as true and correct.
No opinion regarding the value of subsurface oil, gas, or mineral rights is expressed. The property is not believed to be encumbered by easements nor rights to surface entry for the exploration or removal of such materials unless expressly stated.
10. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous material substances, including without limitation asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, urea-formaldehyde, foam insulation, petroleum leakage, agricultural chemicals, or other potentially hazardous materials, which may or may not be present on the subject property, were not called to the attention of nor did the appraiser become aware of such during the appraiser's inspection. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property unless otherwise stated. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to test or detect such substances. The presence of such hazardous substances may affect the value of the property. Unless otherwise indicated in the report, all values estimated in this appraisal are based on the assumption that no hazardous substances exist on or in the property or in such proximity to it that would cause a loss in value.
No responsibility is assumed for any hazardous substances or for any expertise or knowledge required to discoverthem. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired.
6. 7
8. 9.
193
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 5 This appraisal report should not be considered an inspection report on the physical nature or condition of the property. The subject has been inspected on a casual level and no attempt beyond ordinary visual inspection has been made to determine the adequacy or condition of the property. The appraiser is not a construction, engineering, environmental, or legal expert, and anystatements given on these matters should be considered preliminary in nature.
Limiting Conditions
This appraisal is provided only for the purpose of property valuation and the appraiser is neither qualified nor attempting to go beyond that narrow scope. The reader should be aware that there are inherent limitations to the accuracy of the information and analysis contained in this appraisal.
L3 The liability of the appraiser and the Hopper Company is limited solely to the client and only to the amount of the fee actually paid for the appraisalservices. Any third parties not identified as intended users who rely upon this appraisal, its facts, or conclusions, do so at their own risk and waive the right to bring any action, directly or indirectly, against the appraiser or firm. 14 The appraisal report is a technicaldocument designed to serve the specific needs of the client and any other intended users that are specifically identified, Other readers are cautioned that thereportmaynotcontainallof theinformationknownbytheappraiserconcerningthesubject property or the real estate market. While no factors considered to be significant have been knowingly withheld, there is a potential that information of importance to another reader may not be included in the report.
15 This appraisal is performed with a limited amount of data. These limitations arise from economic, physical, and legal constraints that prohibit the appraiser from making exhaustive investigations aboutthe subject property, the realestate market, and the comparable data.
A reasonable attempt to gather, investigate, and verify the comparable data used in this appraisal is made by the appraiser consistent with the efforts typically made by other real estate professionals operating in the localmarket. However, the analyses and conclusions used in this appraisal are subject to the accuracy ofsuch data,
17 No opinion is intended to be expressed for legal matters or that which requires specialized investigation or knowledge beyond that ordinarily employed by real estate appraisers.
No engineering survey of the property has been made bythe appraiser. Data relative to size, dimensions, and area are derived from sources deemed reliable. Maps, plats, and exhibits included in the report are for illustration only and should not be relied upon for any other purpose.
Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report shall be conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the prior written consent and approval of the author, particularly as to the valuation conclusions, the identity of the appraiser 77 t2
t6
18 19
194
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 6 or firm with which he is connected, or any reference to the Appraisal lnstitute or to the MAI or Al-GRS designations.
20. Possession of this report or any copy thereof does not carry with it the right of publication, nor may the same be used for any purpose by anyone except the appraiser, without the previous written consent of the appraiser, and in any event, only in its entirety. 2t. No right to expert testimony is included with this report and the fee for this appraisal does not include payment for pre-trial conferences, taking of depositions, exhibit preparation, expert witness fees, or other additional work beyond the initial scope of this assignment. lf the appraiser is subsequently required to provide any such services, the client or party initiating the demand will be responsible for payment of expert fees associated with the time and effort needed to provide them.
Hypoth etica I Co nd ition
A hypothetical condition is "a condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results, but is used for the purpose of analysis. Hypothetical conditions are contrary to known facts about physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or about conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or about the integrity of data used in the analysis." (Uniform Standards of Professionol Approisal Proctice, Appraisal Foundation, 2024 edition, pg. 4\. The use of one or more hypothetical conditions may affect the assignment results.
22. Two of the subject lots, Lots L and 9, tend to accumulate runoff water in a low-lying ditch. The City of Woodlake intends to correct this situation and will install proper drainage so that these arebuildablelots. Theappraisedvalueforeachofthesetwolotsisbasedonthehypothetical condition that this drainage work has been completed and that the lots are already in a buildable condition on the effective date of value.
195
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 7
CERTIFICATION OF THE APPRAISAL
I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct' . The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions.
r I have no present or prospective interest in the properties that are the subjects of this report and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. r lhave performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the properties that are the subjects of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment'
r I have no bias with respect to the properties that are the subjects of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment.
. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results.
. My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. . My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP)' o I have made a personal inspection of the properties that are the subjects of this report. r No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this certification.
. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of ProfessionalAppraisal Practice of the Appraisal lnstitute. . The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal lnstitute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives.
r As of the date of this report, I have completed the continuing education program for Designated Members of the Appraisal lnstitute.
r lam competent to complete this appraisal assignment. Any steps necessary to achieve competency are disclosed in this report.
. This appraisal assignment was not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the approval of a loan.
Renee E. Hendrick, MAl, R/W-AC, ARA
CA #AG040264 (expires 5/LL/2024\
196
AREA AND SUBJECT
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
HopperCompany
R ea I P r o p e rly VaIu ati o n
197
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 9
CITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD AREA DESCRIPTION
The subject lots are located in the city of Woodlake, in Tulare County, California City of Woodlake
Woodlake is the smallest of eight incorporated cities in Tulare County, and it is situated in the northcentral sectionofthecountyattheintersectionof StateRoutes216and245. Thecommunityisnestled at the base of the foothills of the Sierra Nevada Mountains in the heart of California's citrus region.
Woodlake lies some 16 miles northeast of Visalia, 54 miles southeast of Fresno, and 169 miles north of Los Angeles. The city of Woodlake was founded in 1912 and now encompasses nearly three square miles of land area.
California's Department of Finance placed Tulare County's population al 475,064 people as of January 2023 ranking it 18th in size amongst California's 58 counties.
This is an increase of O.t% or 557 people over the previous twelve months, and it distinguishes the area as the L2th fastest growing county in California during 2022.1 The state as a whole saw a -0.4% decline in population as residents left many of the major metropolitan areas. Just twelve counties saw population growth, including four counties in the southern San Joaquin Valley. Over the past ten years, Tulare County's population has grown by a3% or a compounded rate of 0.4% peryear, and it has continued to increase every year for more than 50 years.
Woodlake's population stood at 7,711 people at the beginning of 2023, an increase of 64 people or 0.8% over the past year. This makes it the second fastest growing city in Tulare County and California's 65th quickest expanding town for the year. lt is expected that Woodlake will continue to increase its population at a slow but steady pace over the next several years.
Farm-related employment represents more than one-quarter of all jobs in Tulare County and it is perpetually the largest employment sector. Other sectors that make up the local economy include government, retail trade, manufacturing, educational and health services, leisure and hospitality, professional and business services, and construction.
Tulare County's available labor pool was2t4,4OO people as of January 2024 with an unemployment rate of 1,1,.8%forthemonth. Thisishigherthanthel0.g%joblesslevelofthepreviousmonthaswellasthe
9.9% rate that was experienced a year earlier.2 Tulare County now ranks 56th out of 58 counties in California for unemployment. Woodlake's labor force stood at 2,900 workers in January 2024 with unemployme nl oI 9S% for the month. Over the years, the town's prosperity has been closely tied to the production of oranges and olives, and more recentlythe legalization of cannabis has brought new jobs as well. Major employers in the area include Monrovia Nursery, Golden State Citrus packing, Dryvit Systems construction materials, Randall Manufacturing, and Fruit Grower's Supply. 1 California Department of Finance, www.dof.ca.gov
2 California Employment Development Department, www.edd.ca.gov 198
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake The local real estate market has generally been on an upward trend for more than a decade with only periodic pauses in property value appreciation before resuming its push higher to historic value levels.
More recently, sharp increases in interest rates and inflation have slowed some sectors of the commercial market, while the residential sector has been more resilient.
Previously, home values in Tulare County peaked in December 2005 with a median house price of 5269,71L, and the low point in the market was reached in April 2011, when house prices sat at a median level ofjustS11L,600. Sincethelowpointofthetrough,housevalueshaverecoverednicelyandinJune 2020 the median vatue stood at $270,000, eclipsing the previous record high for the first time. Since then, existing home prices have continued to rise and reached a new peak of 5385,000 seen in September 2023, before falling off a bit to a most recent level of 5349,000 in January 2024,3 Neighborhood Area
The neighborhood area where the subject property is located is a largely residential section of Woodlake thatisontheeastsideofthecity. TheboundariesthathelptodefinetheneighborhoodareOliveLaneon the west, the Woodlake city limits and Castle Rock on the east, Lakeview Avenue on the north, and Naranjo Boulevard (State Route 216) on the south.
The neighborhood is located just to the east of Woodlake's downtown central business district, which is hometoCityHall andmuchofthetown'sretail andofficespace. BravoLake,asmall bodyofwaterthat offers gardens, a walking trail, fishing, and other scenic and recreational opportunities is adjacent to the south. Rural uses are in place to the east while a similar residentialarea is positioned to the north.
The neighborhood is readily accessible from two rural state highways that also are the main entry points for Woodlake. State Route 245 (Valencia Boulevard) runs north-south through the heart of the city and connectsittostateRoutelgssomesixmilestothesouthoftown. StateRoute216(NaranjoBoulevard) extends in an east-west direction through the community and connects it to other ruraltowns in Tulare County.
Most of the properties in the neighborhood are zoned residential with single-family homes being most prevalent. Housing in this area was built as far back as the 1930s and new construction has continued to occur sporadically since then. Because the neighborhood is highly built out, little new construction has taken place overthe past decade, but some older properties have been updated and this is beneficial to their value. Residential properties experienced significant value increases for several years thanks to low mortgage interest rates and strong homebuyer demand. The market has slowed over the past two years, however, as interest rates have risen sharply, steep inflation has set in, and the economy has shown recessionary traits. Residential property values have shown some resilience in the face of these challenges, but the volume of sales activity has declined, 10 3 Median Prices of Existing Detached Homes, California Association of Realtors, www.car.org 199
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 11,
SU BI ECT P RO P E RTY I D E NTI F I CATI O N
Subiect Propertv: Lots 1 through 9 of Lakeview Estates
Southwest corner of Lakeview Avenue and Pomegranate Street Woodlake, California 93286
Propertv Owner: City of Woodlake
350 North Valencia Boulevard
Woodlake, California 93286
Ownership HistorV: The City of Woodlake purchased the subject property from Jesse Reynoso by Grant Deed No. 202L-00821,67, which recorded on November5,202L. The purchase price was 5495,000 and at that time the property consisted of three lots, each measuring approximately 50 feet wide by 405 feet long, with two of the lots improved with older single-family homes that were in poor condition. These properties had been on the market for sale at a cumulative asking price of 5520,000 since June 2021". Following the close of escrow, the City cleared the sites of all improvements and later recorded the final map for Lakeview Estates, which divided the property into nine residential lots. No othersales have occurred in the pastthree years and the property is not currently listed forsale.
Lesal Description: Lots 1 through 9 of the Final Map of Lakeview Estates, in the City of Woodlake, County of Tulare, State of California, as per map recorded in Volume 45, Page 8 of Maps, Tulare County Records, situated in the Southwest quarter of Section 30, Township 17 South, Range 27 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian.
SUBT ECT P RO PE RTY DESCRI PTI O N
Site Description: The subject lots are part of a new subdivision tract known as Lakeview Estates, which is located at the southwest corner of Lakeview Avenue and Pomegranate Street, in Woodlake. The lots are vacant parcels that are suitable for the construction of new single-family houses.
The project is bounded by LakeviewAvenue on the north and curb, gutter, and sidewalk are in place along this frontage. Pomegranate Street borders the subdivision on its east side and has curb and gutter installed. Olive Lane along the project's west side currently functions as an alley and there are no off-site improvements installed on this exposure. Lakeview Avenue and Pomegranate Street each support two lanes of traffic, while Olive Lane that can only handle one vehicle at a time. With the recording of the subdivision map, 30.00 feet of right of way was dedicated for the eventual widening of Olive Lane.
The nine lots vary in size from 4,955 square feet to 10,026 square feet with an average size of 6,L56 square feetandamediansizeof5,000squarefeet. Mostofthelotsare50feetwideandtheirdepthsrangefrom L00 to 201 feet. There are two corner-oriented lots and seven lots within an interior orientation. All of the lots are summarized in the table on the next page.
200
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake t2 Size -
Square Feet
Lot
Orientation
Public
Utilities
Assessor's
Parcel No.
Available
Available
Available
Available
Available
Extended
Extended
Exten ded
Available
7,404
s,000
s,000
5,000
5,000
4,955
5,014
'J.0,026
8,003
Corner
lnterior
Interior
lnterior
lnterior
Corner
lnterior
lnterior
lnterior
061-140-063
061-140-064
061-140-06s
061-140-066
061-740-067
061-140-068
061-140-069
061-140-070
06r-140-07r
55,402
Lot
No.
Appraised
condition
Assumed
As-ls
As-ls
As-ls
As-ls
As-ls
As-ls
As-ls
Assumed
Total
All public utilities are available to serve the subject lots, including natural gas from SoCalGas Company; electricity from the Southern California Edison Company; telephone, cable television, and internet service from Frontier Communications; and domestic water, sanitary sewer, storm water drainage, and trash collection from the City of Woodlake. Three of the lots (Lots 5,7 and 8)were previously improved and utilities have been extended to them. The other six lots will need to have lateral lines installed to access the utilities.
The topography of the land is generally level with a slight natural sloping from east to west, but none of the lots has been formally graded and compacted yet. Soil conditions are assumed to be stable and capable of supporting typical residential improvements, although no geotechnical report has been provided for review.
Drainage of the property appears to be adequate and water tends to runoff towards the gutters in the fronting streets or towards a drainage ditch that runs across Lots 1 and 9. This ditch will need to be piped so that water does not accumulate on these lots and they are buildable, which the City of Woodlake intends to do, and the valuation of these two lots is based on the hypothetical condition that this work has already been done.
According to the flood insurance rate map prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the subject lots are in an'X'flood zone. This zone denotes areas determined to be outside the
0.2% annual chance flood plain (500-year flood); it is not a specialflood hazard area and properties in this zone are not typically required to carry flood insurance as part of a mortgage transaction.
No obvious visible signs of toxic materials, hazardous wastes, or other undesirable substances have been noticed on the lots. However, the appraiser is not an expert in thisfield and does not claim to have any special knowledge or ability with regards to the existence or detection of such materials. No phase one environmental site assessment report of the property has been provided for review. The GeoTracker website published by the California State Water Resources Control Board does not indicate any known t
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
201
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake leaking underground storage tanks, land disposalsites, military sites, or other cleanup sites on the subject property.
The subdivision tract is bordered to the north, east, and south by residential properties. To the west across Olive Lane is a medical and dental clinic that is operated by Family HealthCare Network.
ZONING AND PROPERTY RESTRICTIONS
The City of Woodlake recently changed the zoning that is applied to the subject lots from R-H high density residential to R-L low density residential through a resolution adopted by the City Council in May 2023.
The purpose of the R-L zone is to provide residential neighborhoods of mostly, but not exclusively, singlefamily homes at a density of 2 to 10 dwelling units per gross acre. Permitted uses include single-family dwellings, employee housing (fewer than six employees), supportive or transitional housing, accessory dwelling units, guest houses, cannabis cultivation for personal use, receiving cannabis deliveries, small family daycares, public schools, parks and playgrounds, raising of crops and horticultural specialties, keeping of household pets, and storm drainage basins.
lf a conditional use permit is obtained, then the R-L zone also allows assisted living and skilled nursing facilities, bed and breakfast inns, emergency shelters, mobile home parks, multifamily dwellings with between two and four units per building, recreational vehicle parks, residential care facilities, assembly facilities (churches and community centers), utility substations, private schools, and vocational or business schools.
Development standards for the R-L zone include:
L. Lot size - minimum of 5,000 square feet.
2. Lot dimensions:
a. Frontage - minimum of 40 feet.
b. Width - minimum of 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots, c. Depth - minimum of 100 feet for lots fronting on a local street and L30 feet for lots fronting on collector or arterialstreets.
3. Dwelling units per lot - no more than one dwelling unit on each lot, unless approved as an accessory dwelling u nit.
4. Lot coverage - maximum of 4O% of lot area.
5. Building setbacks:
a. Front - minimum of L5 feet for living areas and 20 feet for garages. b. Side - minimum of 5 feet on interior side and L0 feet on street side. c. Rear - minimum of L5 feet for one-story buildings and 20 feet for multi-story buildings.
5. Building height - maximum of 35 feet.
7. Off-street parking - minimum of two covered parking spaces. r"3
202
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 74 (VALENCIA BLVD.) (CO. RD. 2 t2) STATE HtrvY 65
6 ,€
\
/a\
q
/il
qr
/Cl \5/
*l1
MAGNOLIA
LFfu!QNA
,57
-5 7"
ll
ST
ra
N
o
\
ar)
E
\
olt
(,,)
\
\
(r)
|-n
s.J
(^)
s
:t
il
F
\
\
.rn
*
p
tr
h
s
s
Sr
I
\
x
.-.
\
- POMEGRANA
\
a
\
ril
ro
\
r\
\
\
r\
r-\
\
l}i
S
\
\
\
N
n
o
3o
-<:\
oor\;t:ogb5[\
!h
E-n
P H 18.t6
\o
g
Ol
o
I
I
.F\ f
b
8l
s'
: iEl d.i i
"l
a r! qt 1l
@I
I
!
i
\
-$ *,
-€)
^rO
ai:
G). o
/tu-\ gl \9
,!s G'
ii, :\ .!r'
iil
t
o
I
ie)
o
,A) t"
($|1
\
{
!
o
T
6 13.,
!
o
b
I
ASSESSOR,S PARCEL MAP
203
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 15 t
t
rl
Jl
,,1
a
I
I
ir
F
rl
Lt
IIrt
r!
li
I
t:
l$
I
g
9F
8l lr tcI
r 3;
ri
H'
'14
q
F
i
ntl'
t
,
{
!l
1 trlI
!r
g!
lF
q
!t!
iii
l!i ,ll
I
ti
il
I
il|lll!
'ltil
ilii
ffilfitllt'l
ri
it
!i
;
I
t. I
a\ I
{zJ v
l.
!t
ill
l{,
r.
I
i
q
!
;
!
I
t
r
"\]-
I I
- -r&a'ry-sr tmrtrrrtr'?Frtr-rF- -
,otdnlxAtf, tturt q TI
F
=!
oTl
F
rri
s
rn
E
rn
CT, ilil(ri
rl
h,t
Hil !iE
F1. ;t!
rgr
jtqitr
qft
EII
[!l
trt
Flg
9t
Ee
qi
:
ft$i:
{'rtr-i
!
a
I
I
ilE-r!!^ ' rl!: -
'l|$tll
rlil$ll
rl
ii
I
:
I
c
I
;
I
I
I
!
:
N
I
IH i
l,F
RECORDED MAP OF LAKEVIEW ESTATES
204
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Fstates Resldential Lots, Woodlake 1,6 ,w
I
I
1'l>
t
f.
t
I
.. .t
I
s
?
,
t,
J
t
{
a
,t
rf
t
rl
,1 .
a
'Lli
I
tr
a
I
I
q
t
T
t,
I
\.
)
t.
1 :l
t
lI
I'.t i''{
q'\ 'r\ \ \ '\'\q .
I
t
?
fi l.
t
D
t
',1 I
h
1r
-*,
I
El ,
;
i
$
T
'l
I
I
tD'
't{'' rl
t.
I
!r
,
t.4
, lT'1
o-l.f€l
a
D
I
'rl
wFu 3.J
t
i
I
t
lr
*
,f
I
t'
I
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
205
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake t7 View looking southwest from the intersection
of Lakeview Ave. & Pomegranate St.
View looking southeast from the intersection
of Lakeview Ave. & Olive Ln.
Street scene looking north along
Pomegranate St. The subject is on the left.
View looking west across the subject lots
from Pomegranate Street.
Street scene looking west on Lakeview Ave
from Pomegranate St.
Street scene looking west on Lakeview Ave.
from Olive Ln. The subject is on the right.
,lt.
.:,
'L*1&,hs]---a*I r& :" .l ,-
206
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 18 Street scene looking south on Olive Ln. from
Lakeview Ave. The subject is on the left.
View of Lot 1 with the drainage area
looking south from Lakeview Ave.
View of Lot 3
looking south from Lakeview Ave
View looking north on Olive Ln. from the
south property line. Subject is on the right.
View of Lot 2
looking south from Lakeview Ave.
View of Lot 4
looking south from Lakeview Ave
'i j,q$-:.*l
207
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 1,9 View of Lot 5
looking south from Lakeview Ave.
View of Lot 7
looking west from Pomegranate St.
View of Lot 9
looking northeast from Olive Ln
View of Lot 6
looking west from Pomegranate St
View of Lot 8
looking west from Pomegranate St.
View of the drainage ditch that impacts Lots
1 and 9 that will be piped by the city.
208
ANALYSIS OF DATA
AND VALUE
coNcLUsroNs
HopperCompany
Real Propefty Valuotion
209
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 27
HIGHEST AND BEST USE ANALYSIS
Once the pertinent information about the subject property and the market in which it operates is understood, the next step in the appraisal process is to analyze the highest and best use ofthe property.
The purpose of a highest and best use analysis is to determine the optimal or most likely use of the property, and once a logical conclusion is reached the appropriate valuation approaches can be applied to the property's valuation.
The highest and best use of the property is analyzed in two steps. First, the most probable use of the land as though vacant and unimproved is considered. Then, the analysis is performed again focusing on the property as it is improved and comparing this use to the optimal improvements. ln each step four separate criteria are considered, including those uses that are legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible, and maximally productive.
Because the subject lots are vacant with no improvements on them, there is no need to perform an analysis of the property as improved for this appraisal.
Land As Though Vocant Anolysis
The R-L zoning that is applied to the subject lots is intended primarily for single-family residential uses, but a variety of other uses that are compatible with a residential area are also allowed. Development standards speclfy minimum lot sizes, the number of dwelling units that are allowed per lot, building setbacks, and other design elements that must be followed. Any improvements that are developed on the lots must comply with these public restrictions and obtain appropriate governmental approvals and permits.
The physicalcharacteristics of the lots are well suited to supporting urban improvements of a residential nature. The lots have a generally leveltopography with soils that are believed to be stable and capable of supporting new construction. Utility services are available to all of the lots, with three lots already having them stubbed to the sites for easy connection. The property is centrally located in Woodlake and is just east of the central business district, and the lots are within walking distance to shopping, schools, medical services, churches, and commerce. The surrounding neighborhood area is dominated by older single-family residences with varying levels of maintenance that range from poor to average. Little new construction has occurred in this area, although some redevelopment activity is taking place.
The local real estate market has performed well in recent years. Woodlake has attracted several developers, including both local and national homebuilders, with new projects and together they have built nearly as many homes in the past three years as were constructed in the prior ten-year period. This is all good evidence of the financial feasibility of developing single-family lots as part of a subdivision project.
Therefore, the highest and best use of the land as though vacant is to construct new single-family homes on each of the nine lots. The homes should be targeted at entry-level homebuyers and ought to be of average-quality construction so that they integrate with the surrounding neighborhood. The most likely buyers of the lots are a small homebuilder or individual homeowners. 210
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 22
METHOD OF VALUATION
Traditionally, real property valuation revolves around three approaches to value: the income capitalization, sales comparison, and cost approach. Each of these approaches studies the property from differing viewpoints and they use various techniques to estimate the value of the interest being appraised. ln this appraisal, the sales comparison approach is used to value the individual lots. The cost approach is not helpful because there are no improvements that are situated on the parcels. Also, the income capitalization approach is not relevant because residential lots like these are not commonly leased in the local market and they are not viewed as being investment properties.
SALES COMPARISON APPROACH
The practice of making comparisons between the subject and the market in which it is located is central to the appraisal process, but in no method of valuation is this practice more prevalent than in the sales comparison approach. This approach seeks to value the improved subject property by comparing it to other similar properties that have recently sold, are actively being marketed for sale, or are under contract to be sold.
Comporoble Residential Lot Sales
The search for comparable market data began in Woodlake. No comparable single family residential lot sales were found that had closed in the past 2 years, To broaden the amount of data, the search was taken back to 2020. Four residential lot sales were found between July 2020 and June 2021 that show a fairly tight range of values. These sales are presented in the grid below.
Sale Street
Address
Sale
Date
Sale
Price
Lot Size -
SF
Price
per Lot Zoning Utilities
No
7 2
3 4
396 N. Cypress
380 & 388 Lakeview
380 Magnolia
266 N. Walnut
7/rol2020
9/4/2020
6/2s/2021
6/2s/2021
sSo,ooo
S175,ooo
577,000
Sso,ooo
7,974
18,636
16,688
10,278
Nearby
Connected
Connected
Connected
sSo,ooo
S87,soo
s77,000
Sao,ooo
R-L
R-L
R-L
R-L
All four of the sales are zoned for low density residential uses and are considered in-fill type lot sales.
Three of the four sales were previously improved with building structures and had already been connected to utility services. The data suggests a range of values from 577,000 to 587,500 per lot. ln order to find more current data, the search was broadened to include other nearby communities in Tulare County that are similar to Woodlake. The results of the search process are five closed sale data items that are selected for further analysis.
211
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake To summarize, the sales occurred between July 2022 and February 2024. The lots range in size from 6,098 1L,897 square feet and they sold in a price range of $75,000 to $95,000 per lot. The properties are located in Exeter, Dinuba, Cutler, and Porterville.
Sale no. L is a vacant lot in the Glenn View Estates subdivision in Exeter. This is a newly developing section of town and the lot is surrounded by modern single-family homes. The lot is rectangular in shape with an interior orientation and it contains 9,670 square feet. Curb and gutter off-sites are in place along the street frontage. The zoning is R-1-6 PUD for single-family residential uses. The property was on the market for about two months at an asking price of 599,990 before it sold in July 2022 for 595,000.
Sa le no. 2 refers to an 1. L,897-square-foot lot that is located along Whitney Way, south of Saginaw Avenue, inDinuba. Theparcel ispartof anestablishedneighborhoodwitholderhomes. lthasarectangularshape and an interior lot orientation with curb and gutter placed along the street frontage. The property is zoned R-1-7.5 for single-family residential uses. lt was listed for sale at 590,000 and took just three weeks to find a buyer. The sale closed in February 2023 for $85,000.
Sale no. 3 is located at the southwest corner of Maple Street and Francis Avenue, in Exeter. lt is in a neighborhood of older homes, and the 9,670-square-foot lot was previously improved with an older 1-,240-square-foot home that had been removed many years ago. Curb and gutter are in place along the two street frontages and there is a paved, public alley at the rear. All public utilities have been extended tothesite. ThevacantlotwaslistedforsaleatS105,000andsoldinAugust2O23aflereightmonthsof exposure for 595,000 all cash.
Sale no. 4 represents a vacant lot located along 1't Drive, west of Orosi Drive, in the small town of Cutler.
The property is in a block of older houses. The rectangular-shaped lot contains 7,405 square feet and it is zoned R-2 for residential uses. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk are installed at the street frontage and there is a dirt alley to the rear. Public utilities have been extended to the lot. lt took less than a month to close a sale in February 2024 after being on the market at a list price of 580,000, and the buyer paid $80,500.
Sale no. 5 is a recent transaction involving a 6,098-square-foot lot that is located along Waukesha Street, south of Putnam Avenue, in Porterville. The interior-oriented lot is surrounded by older homes in an established neighborhood, and it is zoned RM-2 for residential uses. lt is raw land with no off-site improvements installed, but public utilities are readily available. The property came to market at an asking price of$79,900 and it sold in February 2024 after just a few weeks of exposure for 575,000.
Lot Sales Comporisons
Once the comparable market data is selected, these sales are compared to the subject for various elements that tend to impact the prices that are paid for this type of property. ln the table on the next page, each of the important elements is shown along with how they compare to the subject. Symbols are used to show the direction of adjustment that is necessary, including a "+" if the data item is inferior and ought to be adjusted upward, a "-" if the data is superior, and an "=" if the data item is generally similar.
It should be noted, however, that each use of a symbol does not necessarily reflectthe same magnitude of importance to the pricing.
The comparison process involves analyzing each of the data items and making adjustments to them so that they are as equalto the subject as possible. No two properties are exactly alike and, while there can 23 212
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake be numerous differences between a sale property and the subject, often the market focuses on a more limited number of variables. These variables are known as elements of comparison and they can include physical, locational, economic, and transactional factors that influence the price paid for a particular property. To best equate each data item to the subject, the important elements of comparison are identified, analyzed, and adjusted. The specific adjustments that are applied to the comparable market data to equate them to the subject are detailed in the comparison grid below. 24 Sale
No.1
Sale
No.2
Sale
No.3
Sale
No. 4
Sale
No. 5
:, t', i ;i,,.i ! i .t,,, i;' I rt\'t !' lt.,l i,'.j !:;ii t.i .r, L i : i 11, 1 i | lr t tt : i.)j t | :{.) I ; I i.'.ii :' : l / i l"'}'; it i i' i', : t ":1, :.j -' I t :' Location
City
APN
Buyer
Document No
Sale Date
Sale Price
Lot Size - SF
1370 Meadow
Exeter
133-220-050
Lenz
22-4338r
7/7/2022
59s,000
7,405
820 N. Whitney
Dinuba
074-204-019
Velazco
23-06t28
2/8/2023
Sas,ooo
71.,897
1026 W. Maple
Exeter
135-026-014
Palma
23-366s6
8ls/2023
S95,ooo
9,670
R-1-6
Level
Connected
Rectangula r
Corner
12702 L't Dr.
Cutler
032-132-0r0
Vidauri
24-06652
2/s/2024
Seo,soo
7,405
R-2
Level
Connected
Rectangular
lnterior
170 Waukesha
Porterville
x257-272-0Qt
Martinez
24-06908
2/73/2024
s75,000
6,098
RM-2
Level
Nearby
Rectangular
lnterior
Zoning
Topography
Utilities
Shape
Orientation
R-1-6 PUD
Level
Connected
Recta ngula r
lnterior
R-1-7.5
Level
Nearby
Recta ngular
lnterior
Property Rights
Financing
Cond. of Sale
Market Cond.
lnterim Value > s95,000 = 58s ,000 = Sgs,ooo = Sao,soo = 575,000 Location
Zoning
Parcel Size
Topography
utilities +
+
+
Final lndication < 595,000 < 58s,000 < 595,ooo < s8o,5oo > s75,ooo Lot Volue Conclusions
Most of the subject's lots are in a size range of 4,955 to 5,014 square feet, so the comparisons shown in thegridabovearegearedtowardsvaluingtheselots. Aftercomparison,thedatasuggeststhattheselots 213
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake are worth more than 575,000, less than SSS,OOO to 595,000, and at a level close to S80,S00. Thus, a value of $80,000 per lot is concluded for six of the subject lots.
Lots l and 9 are larger at7,4O4to 8,003 square feet. They are also hypothetically assumed to have had the drainage ditch work done and are buildable lots. A value of 585,000 is concluded for each of these lots.
Lot 8 is by far the largest lot, but its shape is narrow and deep which is less desirable. This is also an interior-oriented lot. Considering these factors, a value of 590,000 is concluded for this parcel.
Therefore, as a result of this analysis and conclusion, it is my opinion that current market value for the fee simple interest in each of the subject lots as of March 7 ,2024 is as follows:
25 Lot 1 (hypothetical condition)
Lot 2 ("as-is" condition)
Lot 3 ("as-is" condition)
Lot 4 ("as-is" condition)
Lot 5 ("as-is" condition)
Lot 6 ("as-is" condition)
Lot 7 ("as-is" condition)
Lot 8 ("as-is" condition)
Lot 9 (hypothetical condition)
7,404 s.f .
5,000 s.f,
5,000 s.f,
5,000 s.f.
5,000 s.f,
4,955 s.f.
5,014 s.f.
10,026 s.f
8,003 s.f.
S85,ooo
s8o,ooo
s8o,ooo
$go,ooo
Sgo,ooo
s8o,ooo
sSo,ooo
$9o,ooo
$gs,ooo
These market value conclusions represent the most probable prices for the specified interest in each of the subject lots. lt is assumed that the lots have received adequate, sufficient, and reasonable exposure to the market prior to the effective date of value for this appraisal, and the values correspond to an estimated exposure time of approximately three to six months. 214
ADDENDA
HopperCompany
ReoI Properly VaIu ation
215
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 27 QUALIFICATIONS OF RENEE E. HENDRICK
MAt, R/W-AC, ARA
I
Professionol Desianations & Certificstion
. MAI designation - Member of the Appraisal lnstitute
. R/W-AC designation - Appraisal Certification of the International Right of Way Association . ARA designation - Accredited Rural Appraiser of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers . California Certified General Real Estate Appraiser: Certificate No. AG040264 Educotion
o University of Denver: M,S. Degree, Real Estate and Construction Management - Appraisal Emphasis:
lncome Property Finance (REAL 4407)
lncome Property lnvestment (REAL 4477)
Residential Construction Systems (CMGT 4405)
Commercial Construction Systems (CMGT 4410)
Computer Applications for Real Estate Analysis (REAL 4007) lncome Property Appraisal (REAL 44L7)
Advanced Real Estate Feasibility Analysis (REAL 4407)
Management of lncome Properties (REAL 4347)
Argus Financial Analysis (REAL 4500)
Advanced Valuation and Report Writing (REAL 4980)
. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo: B.S. Degree, Agricultural Business - Finance and Appraisal Concentration :
Real Estate Appraisal PrinciPles
Basic Valuation Procedures
. Appraisal lnstitute:
Evaluating Commercial Construction
Land Valuation Assignments
Land Valuation Adjustment Procedures
General Appraiser Market Analysis and Highest & Best Use Advanced Market Analysis and Highest & Best Use
Rates and Ratios: Making Sense of GlMs, OARs, and DCFs
Complex Litigation Appraisal Case Studies
Federal and California Statutory and Regulatory Laws
. lnternational Right of Way Association:
Ethics and the Right of Way Profession
Standards of Practice for the Right of Way Profession
Principles of Real Estate Appraisal
Appraisal of Partial Acquisitions
Easement Valuation & Legal Aspects of Easements
Reviewing Appraisals in Eminent Domain
Problems in the Valuation of Partial Acquisitions
Corridor Valuation
216
Appraisal Report - Lakeview Estates Residential Lots, Woodlake 28 Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (Yellow Book) . American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers:
lntegrated ApProaches to Value
Valuation of Permanent Plantings in Changing Markets
Livestock Ranch Seminar
Emplovment Historv
. Farm Credit West - Santa Maria, CA:
Summer lnternshiP
. Schenberger,laylor, McCormick & Jecker, lnc. - San Luis Obispo, CA:
Appraisal Trainee
. Hopper ComPanY - Visalia, CA:
Appraiser 9/06 - Current
Approisql Experience
Actively engaged in real estate appraisal in the Central Valley since 2006. Appraised many types of commercial, industrial, residential, apartment, land, agricultural, and special purpose properties. A partial list of clients includes:
. Government: County of Tulare, City of Visalia, City of Tulare, City of Porterville, City of Farmersville, city of woodlake, city of Exeter, Tulare lrrigation District, Allensworth Community Services District
. Schools: Visalia Unified, College of the Sequoias, San Joaquin Valley College . Lenders: Wells Fargo, Union Bank, Citizens Business Bank, Bank of the Sierra, Bank of the west, Rabobank, suncrest Bank, Kingsburg Federal Land Bank, Farm credit west, Temecula Valley Bank, Bank of Stockton, Central Valley Community Bank . Corporations: Southern California Edison Company, California Water Service Company, Kaweah Management Company, Stihl lnc., lnternational Agri-Center . lnsurance Companies: Nationwide Mutual lnsurance Company . Attorneys: Rauber & Johnson, Baker Manock & Jensen, Herr Pedersen & Berglund, Peltzer & Richardson, Houk & Hornburg, Kahn Soares & Conway, Krase Bailey & ReedKrase . Right-of-Way Firms: Universal Field Services, Bender Rosenthal, Paragon Partners, Tarvin & Associates, Hamner Jewell & Associates, overland Pacific & cutler, Monument . Health care: Kaweah Health, sierra View Local Health care District Co n d em nati on Ex p e ri e n ce
Appraised hundreds of properties involved in full or partial takings on behalf of public agencies, right-of-way firms, law firms, and private property owners. Projects have included road widenings, overcrossings and undercrossings, utility installations, permanent and temporary easements, railroad corridors, and lake expansions.
217
218
City of Woodlake
AGENDA ITEM V-D
March 25, 2024
Prepared by Emmanuel Llamas, City Staff
SUBJECT:
Action: Adoption of Resolution: Greenwood Subdivision Phase I and II Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02. - PUBLIC HEARING
BACKGROUND:
An application was submitted for the formation of the Greenwood Subdivision Phase I and II Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02 by the Developer D.R. Horton CA3, Inc. The subdivision will consist of one hundred and thirty-three residential units and four lots that have been dedicated to the City. The four lots consist of a park and three landscaping strips that will be maintained by the City.
At the February 12, 2024, City Council meeting, the City Council approved the City Engineer’s report of costs needed to maintain the assessment district and on March 11, 2024 initiated the District. As part of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, over 50% of the property owners have voted in favor of the Greenwood Subdivision Phase I and II Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02. Council set March 25, 2024 as the public hearing date for those wishing to comment on the assessment district. All assessment district property owners were notified of the public hearing date and location.
DISCUSSION:
All properties comprising the Greenwood Subdivision Phase I and II Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02 have been entered into the District by the Developer of the Tract, or the owner of the parcel, as per the ‘Conditions of Approval” for recordation of the Tract, and per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
The one hundred and thirty-three properties comprising the Subdivision have all been found to benefit from landscaping, street lighting, park space and therefore are to be assessed for their proportionate share of the costs incurred by those benefits. The annual cost for each individual property owner will be $184.96 as determined by the Engineer’s Report.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That the City Council approves the formation of the Greenwood Subdivision Phase I and II Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02 and assesses the costs to all district property owners and allows for the continuous maintenance of the above-mentioned district.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The assessed amounts are sufficient to cover all expenditures by the City of Woodlake and will not affect the general fund.
219
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution: Approval of the Formation of the Greenwood Subdivision Phase I and II Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02
2. Attachment No. 1 - Property Owner LLAD Ballots with Exhibit - Greenwood Phase I and II – Signed
3. Attachment No. 2 - Engineer’s Report for the Greenwood Subdivision Phase 1 & 2 Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02
220
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WOODLAKE
COUNTY OF TULARE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the matter of:
APPROVAL OF THE FORMATION AND ) Resolution No. 24-
ASSESMENT OF THE GREENWOOD )
SUBDIVISION PHASE I and II )
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING )
ASSESMENT DISTRICT 22-02 )
Councilmember ________________, offered the following resolution and moved its adoption.
Approval of the Formation and Assessment of the Greenwood Subdivision Phase I and II Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Woodlake, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of the 1972, directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an annual report for Assessment District 22-02; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer filed an annual report and notice of public hearing was given in a time and manner required by law; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the Council afforded to every interested person, an opportunity to make a protest to the annual report or the formation of Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02 either in writing or an oral report, and no majority protest either in writing or orally has been made; and
WHEREAS, over fifty percent of those property owners in Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02 voted to be part of the District; and WHEREAS, the report of the engineer is correct and proper in every respect and the conclusions therein reflected are correct and proper; and WHEREAS, all charges hereby imposed are in compliance with California Code, without regard to property valuation, in authority (Section 27-subsection 22594, Streets and Highway Code); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment as set forth in the annual report by the Engineer of Work and hereby levies the assessment set forth therein and approves Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02. 221
The foregoing resolution was adopted upon a motion of Councilmember ___________ and seconded by Councilmember _____________ and carried by the following vote at the City Council meeting held on March 25, 2024.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
____________________
_____________________
Rudy Mendoza, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________
Irene Zacarias, City Clerk
222
#200119
ENGINEER'S REPORT OF CITY OF WOODLAKE
GREENWOOD SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 AND 2
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 22-02
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
Monique C. Mello, P.E., City Engineer for the City of Woodlake, Tulare County, California, and Engineer of Work for Assessment District 22-02, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). The improvements which are the subject of this report are briefly described as follows:
Maintenance of turf areas, shrubs, trees, park, playground, walkways, lighting systems, irrigation systems, and block walls.
This report consists of five exhibits, as follows:
EXHIBIT A Plans and specifications for the improvements are filed with the City Clerk. Although separately bound, the plans and specifications are a part of this report and are included in it by reference.
EXHIBIT B An estimate of the cost of the improvements. EXHIBIT C An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited parcel of land within the assessment district; together with a list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this assessment district, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes, or as known to the Clerk EXHIBIT D A statement of the method by which the undersigned has determined the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel.
EXHIBIT E A diagram showing all of the parcels of real property within this assessment district. The diagram is keyed to Exhibit "C" by assessment number.
EXHIBIT F A statement of findings with respect to the continuation of assessments for this Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 22-02, in compliance with Proposition 218 of the State of California, that went into effect July 1, 1997.
Respectfully submitted,
Monique C. Mello, P.E., City Engineer
223
#200119
ENGINEER'S REPORT OF CITY OF WOODLAKE
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
DISTRICT NO. 22-02
EXHIBIT A
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
GREENWOOD SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 AND 2
(Lots 1 through 133, inclusive)
Subdivision included: GREENWOOD SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 AND 2, Lots 1-133 inclusive Phase 1: Recorded as Document No. 2022-0045783 filed on the 18th day of July 2022 in Book 44 of Maps, at Page 94, Tulare County Records. Phase 2: Recorded as Document No. 2023-0045757 filed on the 29th day of September 2023 in Book 45 of Maps, at Page 16, Tulare County Records. Plans and specifications for the improvements are those prepared by the developer’s engineer for the City Engineer. These plans and specifications have been filed separately with the Clerk of the legislative body and are incorporated in this Report by reference. 224
#200119
ENGINEER'S REPORT OF CITY OF WOODLAKE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
DISTRICT NO. 22-02
EXHIBIT B
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENTS
GREENWOOD SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 AND 2
(Lots 1 through 133, inclusive)
Costs for maintenance and incidentals for improvements on Lots A, B, C, and D, as shown on the improvement plans for Greenwood Subdivision Phase 1 and 2. 1. MAINTENANCE COSTS A. Contractor (Landscaping and Irrigation) $8,700.00
B. Streetlights Maintenance $3,500.00C. Playground Maintenance $1,500.00D. Park Walkways Maintenance $2,700.00E. Wall Maintenance $6,700.00 Subtotal $23,100.00
2. INCIDENTAL COSTS
A. Administration $800.00
B. Engineering (Annual Report) $500.00
C. County Fees $0.00
D. Cost Applied Non-Departmental $0.00E. Miscellaneous $200.00 Subtotal $1,500.00
DISTRICT ASSESSMENT AMOUNT $24,600.00
Each of the 133 equivalent units will continue to be assessed $184.96. 225
#200119
ENGINEER'S REPORT OF CITY OF WOODLAKE
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
DISTRICT NO. 22-02
EXHIBIT C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
GREENWOOD SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 AND 2
(Lots 1 through 133, inclusive)
APN
NUMBER
$
AMOUNT NAME
Lot
Number
ASSESSMENT
NUMBER
SUBDIV.
DESCRIPTION
060-28-001 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
1 1 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-002 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
2 2 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-003 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
3 3 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-004 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
4 4 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-005 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
5 5 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-006 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
6 6 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-20-007 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
7 7 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-008 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
8 8 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-009 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140
Fresno, CA 93711
9 9 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-010 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
10 10 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-011 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
11 11 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-012 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
12 12 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
226
#200119
APN
NUMBER
$
AMOUNT NAME
Lot
Number
ASSESSMENT
NUMBER
SUBDIV.
DESCRIPTION
060-28-013 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
13 13 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-014 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
14 14 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-015 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
15 15 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-016 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
16 16 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-017 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
17 17 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-018 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
18 18 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-019 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
19 19 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-020 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
20 20 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-021 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
21 21 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-022 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
22 22 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-023 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
23 23 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-024 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
24 24 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-025 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
25 25 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-026 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
26 26 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-027 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
27 27 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-028 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
28 28 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
227
#200119
APN
NUMBER
$
AMOUNT NAME
Lot
Number
ASSESSMENT
NUMBER
SUBDIV.
DESCRIPTION
060-28-029 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
29 29 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-030 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
30 30 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-031 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
31 31 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-032 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
32 32 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-033 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
33 33 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-034 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
34 34 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-035 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
35 35 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-036 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
36 36 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-037 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
37 37 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-038 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
38 38 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-039 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
39 39 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-040 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
40 40 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-041 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
41 41 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-042 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
42 42 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-043 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
43 43 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-044 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
44 44 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
228
#200119
APN
NUMBER
$
AMOUNT NAME
Lot
Number
ASSESSMENT
NUMBER
SUBDIV.
DESCRIPTION
060-28-045 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
45 45 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-046 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
46 46 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-047 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
47 47 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-048 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
48 48 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-049 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
49 49 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-050 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
50 50 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-051 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
51 51 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-052 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
52 52 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-053 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
53 53 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-054 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
54 54 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-055 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
55 55 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-056 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
56 56 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-057 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
57 57 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-058 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
58 58 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-059 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
59 59 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-060 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
60 60 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
229
#200119
APN
NUMBER
$
AMOUNT NAME
Lot
Number
ASSESSMENT
NUMBER
SUBDIV.
DESCRIPTION
060-28-061 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
61 61 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-062 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
62 62 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-063 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
63 63 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-064 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
64 64 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-065 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
65 65 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-066 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
66 66 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-067 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
67 67 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-28-068 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
68 68 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 1
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
69 69 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
70 70 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
71 71 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
72 72 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
73 73 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
74 74 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
75 75 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
76 76 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
230
#200119
APN
NUMBER
$
AMOUNT NAME
Lot
Number
ASSESSMENT
NUMBER
SUBDIV.
DESCRIPTION
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
77 77 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
78 78 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
79 79 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
80 80 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
81 81 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
82 82 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
83 83 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
84 84 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
85 85 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
86 86 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
87 87 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
88 88 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
89 89 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
90 90 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
91 91 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
92 92 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
231
#200119
APN
NUMBER
$
AMOUNT NAME
Lot
Number
ASSESSMENT
NUMBER
SUBDIV.
DESCRIPTION
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
93 93 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
94 94 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
95 95 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
96 96 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
97 97 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
98 98 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
99 99 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
100 100 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
101 101 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-171 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
102 102 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
103 103 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
104 104 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
105 105 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
106 106 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
107 107 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-170 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
108 108 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
232
#200119
APN
NUMBER
$
AMOUNT NAME
Lot
Number
ASSESSMENT
NUMBER
SUBDIV.
DESCRIPTION
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
109 109 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
110 110 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
111 111 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
112 112 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
113 113 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
114 114 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
115 115 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
116 116 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
117 117 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
118 118 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
119 119 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
120 120 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-169 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
121 121 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-168 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
122 122 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-168 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
123 123 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-168 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
124 124 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
233
#200119
APN
NUMBER
$
AMOUNT NAME
Lot
Number
ASSESSMENT
NUMBER
SUBDIV.
DESCRIPTION
060-17-168 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
125 125 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-168 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
126 126 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-168 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
127 127 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-168 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
128 128 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-168 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
129 129 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-168 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
130 130 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-168 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
131 131 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-168 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
132 132 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
060-17-168 $184.96 Woodlake Development, LLC
2350 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 140 Fresno, CA 93711
133 133 Greenwood
Subdivision
Phase 2
234
#200119
ENGINEER'S REPORT OF CITY OF WOODLAKE
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
DISTRICT NO. 22-02
EXHIBIT D
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
GREENWOOD SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 AND 2
(Lots 1 through 133, inclusive)
The method of apportionment of assessment is as follows: 100% of the cost of estimated maintenance, repair, replacement, operation, engineering, administration, and incidentals is divided on a proportional basis for R-M lots within the subdivision within the assessment district. Lots are assessed a proportional share at time of Final Map recordation. Duration of Assessments and Inflation Increases: The duration of the assessments to be levied on all parcels of land within the Assessment District, as identified in the report, is perpetual. For each year following the first year of the assessment, the amounts of the assessments designated in the assessment roll may be increased annually, without further notice or ballot to property owners, by an amount equal to the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) for Los Angeles / Anaheim / Riverside (or in the event such index is not published, any successor index which is used in similar industries) provided by the U.S.
Department of Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics); provided that the maximum increase shall not exceed the lesser of (i) the estimated increase in cost to the City, or (ii) four percent (4%). The annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) will be calculated from the calendar year (January 1 – December 31) just prior to the assessment period affected (July 1 – June 30). The benchmark CPI to be used in this calculation shall include all items of the index, including food and energy items. 235
#200119
ENGINEER'S REPORT OF CITY OF WOODLAKE
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
DISTRICT NO. 22-02
EXHIBIT E
DIAGRAM SHOWING ALL PARCELS
OF REAL PROPERTY WITHIN
THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
GREENWOOD SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 AND 2
(Lots 1 through 133, inclusive)
GREENWOOD SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 AND 2, Lots 1 through 133 inclusive Phase 1: Recorded as Document No. 2022-0045783 filed on the 18th day of July 2022 in Book 44 of Maps, at Page 94, Tulare County Records. Phase 2: Recorded as Document No. 2023-0045757 filed on the 29th day of September 2023 in Book 45 of Maps, at Page 16, Tulare County Records.
236
#200119
ENGINEER'S REPORT OF CITY OF WOODLAKE
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
DISTRICT NO. 22-02
EXHIBIT F
STATEMENT OF FINDINGS
GREENWOOD SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 AND 2
(Lots 1 through 133, inclusive)
I. All properties comprising Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 22-02 were entered into the District by the Developer of those Tract as per the "Conditions of Approval" for recordation of those Tracts, and per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.
II. The properties comprising Greenwood Subdivision Phase 1 and 2 have all been found to benefit from landscaping and street lighting and therefore are to be assessed for their proportionate share of the costs incurred by those benefits.
III. An application from the developer of Greenwood Subdivision Phase 1 and 2 has been received by the City of Woodlake requesting that said Subdivision be included in the Landscape and Lighting District No. 22-02 as per the conditions of approval for recordation of said Subdivision. 237
#200119
238
#200119
239
#200119
240
#200119
241
#200119
242
#200119
243
244
245
246
City of Woodlake
AGENDA ITEM V-E
March 25, 2024
Prepared by Ramon Lara, City Staff
SUBJECT:
Action: Adoption of Resolution: Solicit and Consider Input on Possible Competitive and Supplemental Activities to Include in a 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application and Authorize Staff to Proceed with the Application – Public Hearing BACKGROUND:
CDBG Program regulations require that the City conduct a public hearing on all CDBG-related matters to provide for and encourage citizen participation, particularly by low and moderate income persons who reside in areas in which CDBG funds are used. Therefore, when the public hearing is opened, the public will be invited to comment on possible competitive and supplemental activities to include in a 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application.
Public notices in both English and Spanish will be published in the February 21, 2024 and February 28, 2024 issues of The Sun-Gazette Newspaper notifying the public of public hearings on both March 11, 2024 and March 25, 2024 regarding the 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application.
On January 31, 2024, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) is announcing the release of Amendment #1 to the 2023 CDBG Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). The original NOFA was for approximately $19 million in federal funds for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program only for applications from projects that remain on the waitlist established for Over-the-Counter projects after the 2019-2020 NOFA. This amendment makes another $19 million for Housing, Community Development and Economic Development Projects in an Over-the-Counter process.
Funding for this NOFA is available to the state from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), pursuant to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, and 24 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 570 Subpart I “State Community Development Block Grant Program”. These regulations require the state to make funds available to the state’s non-entitlement Units of Local Government. Units of general local government are defined by HUD as political subdivisions of the state, which in California are towns, cities, and counties. Only non-federally recognized Tribes can receive funding through applications submitted by non-entitlement Units of Local Government. No direct funding from the Department can be provided to Tribes, Tribal Designated Housing Entities, or nonprofits.
The Application deadline will be when funds are exhausted or Tuesday April 30, 2024, whichever comes first. Applications will be accepted on a first come, first serve basis. 247
Unfortunately, the City was notified that the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), 2023 Community Development Block Grant Program Notice of Funding Availability – Amendment #1 funds have been exhausted. At this time the City will continue with the design of the project to be ready to submit for grant funding as soon as another funding cycle reopens.
DISCUSSION:
When the Public Comment period is opened, citizens are encouraged to ask questions about this CDBG funding opportunity and/or to provide input on which activities should be included in the City’s application. Citizens are also invited to submit written comments to the City of Woodlake, 350 N. Valencia Blvd., Woodlake, CA 93286.
A separate Public Hearing will be held on March 11, 2024, and March 25, 2024, to discuss and approve the application prior to submittal to HCD. All residents who may be impacted by the project have also been notified of the public hearing via an informational flyer.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
City Staff recommends that City Council solicit and consider input on possible competitive and supplemental activities to include in a 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact currently.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution: Solicit and Consider Input on Possible Competitive and Supplemental Activities to Include in a 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application and Authorize Staff to Proceed with the Application
2. Attachment No. 1 - Sign-In Sheet
3. Attachment No. 2 – Potential Projects
248
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WOODLAKE
COUNTY OF TULARE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the matter of:
SOLICITING AND CONSIDERING ) Resolution No.
INPUT ON POSSIBLE COMPETITIVE )
AND SUPPLEMENTAL ACTIVITIES TO )
INCLUDE IN A 2023 CDGB APPLICATION )
AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PROCEED )
WITH THE APPLICATION )
Councilmember ______, offered the following resolution and moved its adoption. Solicit and consider input on possible competitive and supplemental activities to include in a 2023 CDBG Application and authorize staff to proceed with the application.
WHEREAS, the City of Woodlake wishes to submit a 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to solicit input on potential activities to include in the application; and WHEREAS, notices in both English and Spanish will be published in the February 21, 2024 and February 28, 2024 issues of The Sun-Gazette Newspaper notifying the public of public hearings on both March 11, 2024 and March 25, 2024 regarding the 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application, and all residents who may be impacted by the project have also been notified of the public hearing via an informational flyer.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODLAKE DOES RESOLVE to solicit and consider input on possible competitive and supplemental activities to include in a 2023 CDBG Application and authorizes staff to proceed with the application.
The foregoing resolution was adopted upon a motion of Councilmember _______, and seconded by Councilmember ________, and carried by the following vote at the City Council meeting held on March 25, 2024.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
______________________
Rudy Mendoza, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Irene Zacarias, City Clerk
249
PUBLIC HEARING
City of Woodlake – March 25, 2024
Receive Citizen Input on Possible 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application Activities
SIGN-IN SHEET
NAME PHONE ADDRESS
250
Atachment No. 2 – City of Woodlake Kaweah Stormwater Project 251
City of Woodlake
AGENDA ITEM V-F
March 25, 2024
Prepared by Emmanuel Llamas, City Staff
SUBJECT:
Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of a Categorical Exemption and Categorical Exclusion for the Kaweah Storm Drain Improvement Project BACKGROUND:
The Kaweah Street Storm Drain Improvements project entails the installation of approximately 1,350 feet of a 48" stormwater pipeline, designed to tie into the existing stormwater system. This initiative is crucial for effectively mitigating the recurrent flooding issues that Woodlake has experienced, especially during heavy rainfall periods.
DISCUSSION:
This project aligns with the exemption criteria outlined in 24 CFR 58.35(a), as it involves negligible or no expansion of the existing stormwater system's capacity. The addition of the new pipeline aims to optimize the existing system's performance within its current capacity, rather than extending these limits. The project's focus is on enhancing efficiency in managing runoff volumes during peak conditions, rather than increasing the system's overall hydraulic capacity.
Thus, it is consistent with 24 CFR 58.35(a), which exempts activities and projects that do not significantly alter environmental conditions or allow for significant expansions of existing facilities.
The City, with support from environmental consultants at 4Creeks Inc, has evaluated the project within the context of CEQA and has determined that the project qualifies for Categorical Exemption 15302 (c), and Categorical Exclusion as it is outlined in 24 CFR 58.35(a).
RECCOMENDATIONS:
City staff recommends that Council approves a Categorical Exemption and Categorical Exclusion for the Kaweah Storm Drain Improvement Project.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. CEQA Categorical Exemption
2. NEPA Categorical Exclusion
3. Resolution: Approval of a Categorical Exemption and Categorical Exclusion for the Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) Planning Document
252
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF WOODLAKE
COUNTY OF TULARE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the matter of:
APPROVE A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ) Resolution No. 24-
AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION )
FOR THE CITY OF WOODLAKE )
KAWEAH STORM DRAIN )
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT )
Councilmember__________________, offered the following resolution and moved its adoption.:
Approval of a Categorical Exemption and Categorical Exclusion for the Kaweah Storm Drain Improvement Project.
WHEREAS, The City of Woodlake contracted 4Creeks Inc. to assist with the review of the Kaweah Storm Drain Improvements Projects potential affect on the environment, for compliance with CEQA and NEPA requirements; and
WHEREAS, The City and 4Creeks Inc. has evaluated the project within the context of CEQA and has determined that the project qualifies for Categorical Exemption 15302 (c).
WHEREAS, The City has evaluated the project within the context of NEPA and has determined that the project qualifies for Categorical Exclusion as it is outlined in 24 CFR 58.35(a).
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODLAKE DOES RESOLVE to approve a Categorical Exemption and Categorical Exclusion for the Kaweah Storm Drain Improvement Project and authorizes the City Administrator to file a Notice of Exemption and Notice of Exclusion.
The foregoing resolution was adopted upon a motion of Councilmember , and seconded by Councilmember , and carried by the following vote at the City Council meeting held on March 25, 2024.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT: ___________________
Rudy Mendoza, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________
Irene Zacarias, City Clerk
253
Statutory Exemptions. State code number:
_______________________________________________
Print Form
Notice of Exemption Appendix E
To: Office of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency): ____________________________ P.O. Box 3044, Room 113 _______________________________________________ Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 County Clerk
(Address)
___________________________
___________________________
County of: __________________
Project Title: ____________________________________________________________________________ Project Applicant: ________________________________________________________________________ Project Location - Specific:
Project Location - City: ______________________ Project Location - County:
Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:
_____________________
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: _____________________________________________________ Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: ________________________________________________ Exempt Status: (check one):
Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
Reasons why project is exempt:
Lead Agency
Contact Person: ____________________________ Area Code/Telephone/Extension: _______________ If filed by applicant:
1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Signature: ____________________________ Date:
Signed by Lead Agency Signed by Applicant
Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code. Date Received for filing at OPR:
Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code. _______________
Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: ____________________________________ ______________________________________________
______________ Title: _______________________
Revised 2011
254
Environmental Review for Activity/Project that is NEPA CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION Categorically Excluded Subject to Section 58.5
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
KAWEAH STREET STORM DRAIN
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
March 2024
PREPARED BY:
4-Creeks, Inc.
324 S Santa Fe, STE A
Visalia, CA 93292
PREPARED FOR:
City of Woodlake
350 N. Valencia Street
Woodlake, CA 93286
255
March 19, 2024
Department of Housing and Community Development
2020 W. El Camino Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95833
RE: Categorical Exclusion Application for the Kaweah Street Storm Drain Improvements Project To whom it may concern,
4-Creeks Inc. respectfully submits the Environmental Review Record (ERR) for the Kaweah Street Storm Drain Improvements project on behalf of the City of Woodlake. This submission is in accordance with the requirements of 24 CFR Part 58, pertaining to the environmental review process for projects that are categorically excluded subject to Section 58.5.
The Kaweah Street Storm Drain Improvements project entails the installation of approximately 1,350 feet of a 48" stormwater pipeline, designed to tie into the existing stormwater system. This initiative is crucial for effectively mitigating the recurrent flooding issues that Woodlake has experienced, especially during heavy rainfall periods.
This project aligns with the exemption criteria outlined in 24 CFR 58.35(a), as it involves negligible or no expansion of the existing stormwater system's capacity. The addition of the new pipeline aims to optimize the existing system's performance within its current capacity, rather than extending these limits. The project's focus is on enhancing efficiency in managing runoff volumes during peak conditions, rather than increasing the system's overall hydraulic capacity. Thus, it is consistent with 24 CFR 58.35(a), which exempts activities and projects that do not significantly alter environmental conditions or allow for significant expansions of existing facilities.
Thank you for your assistance in the completion of this project. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this application, please email me at [email protected]. 4-Creeks Inc. will expedite any request for additional information or clarification.
Sincerely,
Molly Baumeister, AICP
Planner
256
Attachment 3: Project Area Map
Attachment 4: USGS Topographic Map
Attachment 5: FEMA Floodplain Map
Attachment 6: National Wetlands Inventory Map
Attachment 7: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC Resource List List of Enclosed Attachments:
Attachment 1: Environmental Review Record
Attachment 2: CEQA Notice of Exemption
257
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development
451 Seventh Street, SW
Washington, DC 20410
www.hud.gov
espanol.hud.gov
Environmental Review for Activity/Project that is Categorically Excluded Subject to Section 58.5
Pursuant to 24 CFR 58.35(a)
This is a suggested format that may be used by Responsible Entities to document completion of a Categorically Excluded Subject to Section 58.5 environmental review.
Project Information:
Project Name: Kaweah Street Storm Drain Improvements
Responsible Entity: City of Woodlake
Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity):
State/Local Identifier: City of Woodlake, California
Preparer: Molly Baumeister, AICP (4Creeks)
Certifying Officer Name and Title:
Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): City of Woodlake
Consultant (if applicable): 4Creeks
Direct Comments to: Molly Baumeister, AICP ([email protected])
Project Location: Between the Kaweah Street/Cypress Street Intersection and Antelope Creek
Description of the Proposed Project [24 CFR 50.12 & 58.32; 40 CFR 1508.25]:
This project proposes installation of approximately 1,350 feet of a 48" stormwater pipeline to tie into the existing stormwater system. The purpose of the project is to effectively mitigate the recurrent flooding issues that Woodlake has experienced during periods of heavy rainfall. The project is designed to improve the system's efficiency in handling the current runoff volume, especially under conditions of peak flow.
Level of Environmental Review Determination:
Categorically Excluded per 24 CFR 58.35(a), and subject to laws and authorities at §58.5, per 24 CFR 58.35(a)(1)
258
Funding Information
Grant Number HUD Program Funding Amount
Estimated Total HUD Funded Amount:
Estimated Total Project Cost (HUD and non-HUD funds) [24 CFR 58.32(d)]:
$2,628,473
Compliance with 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities Record below the compliance or conformance determinations for each statute, executive order, or regulation. Provide credible, traceable, and supportive source documentation for each authority. Where applicable, complete the necessary reviews or consultations and obtain or note applicable permits of approvals. Clearly note citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references. Attach additional documentation as appropriate.
Compliance Factors:
Statutes, Executive Orders,
and Regulations listed at 24
CFR §58.5 and §58.6
Are formal
compliance
steps or
mitigation
required?
Compliance determinations
STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 & 58.6
Airport Hazards
24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D
Yes No
The project site is not within 2,500 feet of a
civilian airport or 15,000 feet of a military
airport. This project consists only of adding
a stormwater pipe and is in compliance with
the HUD’s Airport Hazard regulations
without further evaluation.
Coastal Barrier Resources
Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as
amended by the Coastal Barrier
Improvement Act of 1990 [16
USC 3501]
Yes No
This project is located in California and
therefore does not have Coastal Barrier
Resources.
Flood Insurance
Flood Disaster Protection Act of
1973 and National Flood
Insurance Reform Act of 1994
Yes No
The project will be located in an area
designated as Flood Zones AH and X. The
project will be buried and would not be
impacted by flooding.
259
[42 USC 4001-4128 and 42 USC
5154a]
STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 & 58.5
Clean Air
Clean Air Act, as amended,
particularly section 176(c) & (d);
40 CFR Parts 6, 51, 93
Yes No
This project consists only of adding a storm
drainage pipe and is in compliance with the
Clean Air Act without further evaluation.
Coastal Zone Management
Coastal Zone Management Act,
sections 307(c) & (d)
Yes No
The project is not located within a California
Coastal Zone Management Program or any
Coastal Barrier Resources areas.
Contamination and Toxic
Substances
24 CFR Part 50.3(i) & 58.5(i)(2)
Yes No
The project site is not located on-site or
nearby toxic, hazardous, or radioactive
substances that could affect the health and
safety of project occupants or conflict with
the intended use of the property.
Endangered Species
Endangered Species Act of 1973,
particularly section 7; 50 CFR
Part 402
Yes No
There are no critical habitats and no
endangered species in the project area. This
determination was made based on the
USFWS public database (Attachment 7) and
the classification of the project.
Explosive and Flammable
Hazards
24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C
Yes No
The project will not result in an increased
number of people being exposed to hazardous
operations. The project does not involve
explosive or flammable materials or
operations.
Farmlands Protection
Farmland Protection Policy Act
of 1981, particularly sections
1504(b) and 1541; 7 CFR Part
658
Yes No
The project would add a stormwater pipe
underground and would not have the potential
to convert farmland into non-agricultural
uses.
Floodplain Management
Executive Order 11988,
particularly section 2(a); 24 CFR
Part 55
Yes No
The project will be located in an area
designated as Flood Zones AH and X. The
project will be buried and would not be
impacted by flooding. A map of the
floodplains are attached in Attachment 6.
Historic Preservation
National Historic Preservation
Act of 1966, particularly sections
106 and 110; 36 CFR Part 800
Yes No
After referencing the California Register of
Historical Resources and the National
Register of Historic Places online mapping
tool, the project is not located on any tribal
lands and there are no known cultural or
260
historic resources occurring within the project
area.
Noise Abatement and Control
Noise Control Act of 1972, as
amended by the Quiet
Communities Act of 1978; 24
CFR Part 51 Subpart B
Yes No
The project would not create new noise
sources and would have no noise impacts
under HUD guidelines.
Sole Source Aquifers
Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974,
as amended, particularly section
1424(e); 40 CFR Part 149
Yes No
The project is not served by a US EPA
designated sole-source aquifer, is not located
within a sole source aquifer watershed, and
would not affect a sole-source aquifer subject
to the HUD EPA MOU.The nearest SSA is
the Fresno County Aquifer SSA,
approximately 20 miles north.
Wetlands Protection
Executive Order 11990,
particularly sections 2 and 5
Yes No
The project will intersect with Antelope
Creek, which is designated as a Riverine by
the National Wetlands Inventory. A
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan is
being prepared to mitigate any potential
impacts. This will be required prior to
obtaining grading permits. This includes
actions both during and after the project's
completion to ensure that the wetland is
preserved to the greatest extent possible.
Wild and Scenic Rivers
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of
1968, particularly section 7(b)
and (c)
Yes No
The project is not within proximity of a
National Wild and Scenic Rivers Systems
river.
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
Environmental Justice
Executive Order 12898
Yes No
The project activity involves adding a
stormwater pipe underground. The project
would not result in disproportionately adverse
environmental effects on minority or low
income populations as the project does not
involve displacement of residents.
Field Inspection (Date and completed by):
Summary of Findings and Conclusions:
The project is in compliance with the relevant statutes, executive orders, and regulations as per 24 CFR §58.5 and §58.6, thereby making it consistent with 24 CFR 58.35(a). As such, the project is categorically excluded and does not require an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). 261
Mitigation Measures and Conditions [40 CFR 1505.2(c)]
Summarize below all mitigation measures adopted by the Responsible Entity to reduce, avoid, or eliminate adverse environmental impacts and to avoid non-compliance or non-conformance with the above-listed authorities and factors. These measures/conditions must be incorporated into project contracts, development agreements, and other relevant documents. The staff responsible for implementing and monitoring mitigation measures should be clearly identified in the mitigation plan.
Law, Authority, or Factor Mitigation Measure
Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP)
ORDER WQ 2022-0057-DWQ
Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Project
proponent shall submit a NOI and SWPPP to the
RWQCB to obtain coverage under the General Permit for
Discharges of Stormwater Associated with Construction
Activity. The SWPPP shall specify and require the
implementation of BMPs, with the intent of keeping all
products of erosion from moving offsite and into
receiving waters during construction. The requirements
of the SWPPP shall be incorporated into design
specifications and construction contracts.
262
Determination:
This categorically excluded activity/project converts to Exempt, per 58.34(a)(12) because there are no circumstances which require compliance with any of the federal laws and authorities cited at §58.5. Funds may be committed and drawn down after certification of this part for this (now) EXEMPT project; OR
This categorically excluded activity/project cannot convert to Exempt because there are circumstances which require compliance with one or more federal laws and authorities cited at §58.5. Complete consultation/mitigation protocol requirements, publish NOI/RROF and obtain “Authority to Use Grant Funds” (HUD 7015.16) per Section 58.70 and 58.71 before committing or drawing down any funds; OR
This project is now subject to a full Environmental Assessment according to Part 58 Subpart E due to extraordinary circumstances (Section 58.35(c)).
Preparer Signature: __________________________________________Date:_3/19/24__ Name/Title/Organization: Molly Baumeister, AICP / 4-Creeks, Inc._________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Responsible Entity Agency Official Signature:
____________________________________________________________Date:________ Name/Title: ______________________________________________________________ This original, signed document and related supporting material must be retained on file by the Responsible Entity in an Environmental Review Record (ERR) for the activity/project (ref: 24 CFR Part 58.38) and in accordance with recordkeeping requirements for the HUD program(s). 263
CEQA NOTICE OF
EXEMPTION
Attachment 2
264
Statutory Exemptions. State code number:
_______________________________________________
Print Form
Notice of Exemption Appendix E
To: Office of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency): ____________________________ P.O. Box 3044, Room 113 _______________________________________________ Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 County Clerk
(Address)
___________________________
___________________________
County of: __________________
Project Title: ____________________________________________________________________________ Project Applicant: ________________________________________________________________________ Project Location - Specific:
Project Location - City: ______________________ Project Location - County:
Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:
_____________________
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: _____________________________________________________ Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: ________________________________________________ Exempt Status: (check one):
Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
Reasons why project is exempt:
Lead Agency
Contact Person: ____________________________ Area Code/Telephone/Extension: _______________ If filed by applicant:
Attach certified document of exemption finding.
Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Signature: ____________________________ Date:
6LJQHG E\ /HDG $JHQF\ 6LJQHGE\ $SSOLFDQW
Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code. Date Received for filing at OPR:
Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code. _______________
Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: ____________________________________ ______________________________________________
______________ Title: _______________________
Revised 2011
City of Woodlake
350 N. Valencia
Woodlake, CA
Tulare
221 S. Mooney Blvd.
Visalia, CA 93291
Kaweah Street Storm Drain Improvements
City of Woodlake
Extending from the Kaweah Street/Cypress Street Intersection to Antelope Creek City of Woodlake Tulare County
This project proposes installation of approximately 1,350 feet of a 48" stormwater pipeline to tie into the existing stormwater system.
The purpose of the project is to effectively mitigate the recurrent flooding issues that Woodlake has experienced during periods of heavy rainfall. The project is designed to improve the system's efficiency in handling the current runoff volume, especially under conditions of peak flow.
City of Woodlake
Ramon Lara, City Administrator/Finance Director
x Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14 § 15302 (c)
The project involves negligible or no expansion of capacity of the existing stormwater system. The new stormwater line, while being an addition to the existing network, is designed improve the current system's performance under existing capacity limits, rather than extending these limits. The project does not increase the overall hydraulic capacity of the system in terms of the maximum volume of water it can handle at any given time. Instead, it enhances how effectively the system can manage the existing volume of runoff, particularly during peak flow conditions.
Ramon Lara 559.564.8055
265
PROJECT AREA MAP
Attachment 3
266
AVENUE 352
N VALENCIA BLVD
W CAJON AVE
W KAWEAH
AVE
OLIVERA DR
N CYPRESS ST
N PINE ST
W SEQUOIA AVE
ROAD 206
Antelope Creek
Project Area
Kaweah Storm Drainage Improvements
City of Woodlake
Date Exported: 3/19/2024
0 0.1 0.2 0.05
Miles
Legend
Proposed Storm Pipe
Woodlake Sphere of Influence
Woodlake City Limits
Streams
267
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Attachment 4
268
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
USGS Topographic Map
Kaweah Storm Drainage Improvements
City of Woodlake
Date Exported: 3/19/2024
0 0.65 1.3 0.33
Miles
Legend
Proposed Storm Pipe
Woodlake Sphere of Influence
Woodlake City Limits
269
FEMA FLOODPLAIN MAP
Attachment 5
270
A
X
AH
FEMA Flood Maps
Kaweah Storm Drainage Improvements
City of Woodlake
Date Exported: 3/19/2024
0 0.1 0.2 0.05
Miles
Legend
Proposed Storm Pipe
Woodlake Sphere of Influence
Woodlake City Limits
FEMA Flood Zone
A
AE
AH
AO
X
271
NATIONAL WETLANDS
INVENTORY MAP
Attachment 6
272
Antelope Creek
National Wetlands Inventory Map
Kaweah Storm Drainage Improvements
City of Woodlake
Date Exported: 3/19/2024
0 0.1 0.2 0.05
Miles
Legend
Proposesd Storm Pipe
Wetlands
Woodlake City Limits
Woodlake Sphere of
Influence
273
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
IPaC RESOURCE LIST
Attachment 7
274
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 1/17 IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Tulare County, California
Local office
Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
(916) 414-6600
(916) 414-6713
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
275
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 2/17 Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
276
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 3/17 Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project-specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ). 1 2
277
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 4/17
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
Birds
Reptiles
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Fisher Pekania pennanti
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3651
Endangered
San Joaquin Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis mutica
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2873
Endangered
NAME STATUS
California Condor Gymnogyps californianus
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8193
Endangered
NAME STATUS
Northwestern Pond Turtle Actinemys marmorata
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1111
Proposed Threatened
NAME STATUS
California Tiger Salamander Ambystoma californiense
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2076
Threatened
278
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 5/17 Insects
Crustaceans
Flowering Plants
Western Spadefoot Spea hammondii
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5425
Proposed Threatened
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Candidate
NAME STATUS
Conservancy Fairy Shrimp Branchinecta conservatio
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8246
Endangered
NAME STATUS
Greene's Tuctoria Tuctoria greenei
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1573
Endangered
San Joaquin Adobe Sunburst Pseudobahia peirsonii
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2931
Threatened
San Joaquin Valley Orcutt Grass Orcuttia inaequalis
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5506
Threatened
279
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 6/17 Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
You are still required to determine if your project(s) may have effects on all above listed species.
Bald & Golden Eagles
There are likely bald eagles present in your project area. For additional information on bald eagles, refer to Bald Eagle Nesting and Sensitivity to Human Activity For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to bald or golden eagles, or their habitats , should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below.
Specifically, please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-takemigratory-birds Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservationmeasures.pdf Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-andgolden-eagles-may-occur-project-action 1 2
3 280
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 7/17
BREEDING SEASON
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4- week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week NAME
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Breeds Jan 1 to Aug 31
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1680
Breeds Jan 1 to Aug 31
281
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 8/17 probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Bald Eagle
Non-BCC
Vulnerable
Golden Eagle
Non-BCC
Vulnerable
What does IPaC use to generate the potential presence of bald and golden eagles in my specified location?
The potential for eagle presence is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply). To see a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool. 282
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 9/17 What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs of bald and golden eagles in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Please contact your local Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office if you have questions.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below.
Specifically, please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-takemigratory-birds Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/ documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and1 2 3
283
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 10/17 The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.
BREEDING SEASON
golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action
NAME
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Breeds Jan 1 to Aug 31
Belding''s Savannah Sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis
beldingi
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 15
Bullock's Oriole Icterus bullockii
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Breeds Mar 21 to Jul 25
California Gull Larus californicus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Mar 1 to Jul 31
284
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 11/17 Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Clark's Grebe Aechmophorus clarkii
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Jun 1 to Aug 31
Common Yellowthroat Geothlypis trichas sinuosa
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2084
Breeds May 20 to Jul 31
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1680
Breeds Jan 1 to Aug 31
Oak Titmouse Baeolophus inornatus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9656
Breeds Mar 15 to Jul 15
Tricolored Blackbird Agelaius tricolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3910
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 10
Western Grebe aechmophorus occidentalis
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6743
Breeds Jun 1 to Aug 31
285
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 12/17 probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4- week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. 286
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 13/17
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Bald Eagle
Non-BCC
Vulnerable
Belding''s
Savannah
Sparrow
BCC - BCR
Bullock's Oriole
BCC - BCR
California Gull
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Clark's Grebe
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Common
Yellowthroat
BCC - BCR
Golden Eagle
Non-BCC
Vulnerable
Oak Titmouse
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Tricolored
Blackbird
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Western Grebe
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified location?
287
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 14/17 The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. 288
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 15/17 Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint.
On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. 289
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 16/17 There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on-site delineation to determine whether wetlands occur. Additional information on the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
RIVERINE
R4SBC
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
290
3/18/24, 3:47 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/7P7XR6IH4RDVZFRNJCI4WDFXA4/resources 17/17 The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. 291