Woodland City Council
April 7, 2026

City of Woodland

Meeting Agenda

City Council
City Hall
Council Chambers
300 First Street
Woodland, CA 95695
April 7, 2026
6:00 PM

JOINT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL/WOODLAND FINANCE AUTHORITY MEETING 6:00 PM

A. CALL TO ORDER

B. ROLL CALL

C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Land Acknowledgment Statement - The City of Woodland acknowledges the land on which we live and work. For thousands of years, this land has been the home of Patwin people. Today, there are three federally recognized Patwin tribes: Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community, Kletsel Dehe Wintun Nation, and Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation. The Patwin people have remained committed to the stewardship of this land over many centuries. It has been cherished and protected, as elders have instructed the young through generations. We are honored and grateful to be here today on their traditional lands.

D. COMMUNICATIONS - PUBLIC COMMENT

This is an opportunity for the public to speak to the Council on any item other than those listed on this agenda.

Speakers are requested to use the microphone in front of the Council and to begin by stating their name, whether they reside in Woodland and the name of the organization they represent if any. The Mayor may impose a time limit on any speaker depending on the number of people wanting to speak and time available for the rest of the agenda.

In the event comments are related to an item scheduled on the agenda, speakers may be required to wait to make their comments until that item is considered. The option to submit a public comment via voicemail is no longer available. Written Public Comments Members of the public are welcome to submit written comments prior to the meeting. Comments should be submitted by email to [email protected]. Written Comments received at least two (2) hours prior to the scheduled start time of the City Council meeting will be provided to the City Council and posted to the City website as part of the official record of the meeting but will not be read into the record. Written Comments received within two (2) hours of the scheduled start time of the City Council meeting and during the City Council meeting will be provided to the City Council the day following the City Council meeting. If you are submitting written comments on a particular item on the agenda, please identify the agenda item number and letter. If you are submitting written comments on an item not listed on the agenda, please identify your e- mail/comment as a General Public Comment. Note: Public comments at special meetings are limited to items on the agenda only.

1. SUBJECT: General Public Comments

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: This section is reserved for "General" Public Comments emailed within two (2) hours prior to the Council Meeting. These comments will be provided to the City Council and incorporated into the meeting minutes. Any other written communications submitted for items specific to this agenda will be attached as a file to the associated agenda item.

E. COMMUNICATIONS - COUNCIL/STAFF STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS

This is an opportunity for the Council Members and Staff to make comments and announcements, to express concerns, or to request Council's consideration of any items a Council Member would like to have discussed at a future Council meeting.

2. SUBJECT: Long Range Calendar

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the Long Range Calendar for informational purposes only.

F. CONSENT CALENDAR

3. SUBJECT: Proclaim April as Child Abuse Prevention Month

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council proclaim April as Child Abuse Prevention month.

4. SUBJECT: Proclamation Recognizing Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention in Woodland

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a proclamation recognizing sexual assault awareness and prevention in Woodland.

5. SUBJECT: Proclamation Declaring April 19–25, 2026 as "National Volunteer Week"

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Proclamation declaring April 19 – 25, 2026 as National Volunteer Week.

6. SUBJECT: Proclamation Declaring April 12 – 18, 2026 as "National Public Safety Telecommunications Week"

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends the City Council declare April 12 – 18, 2026 as "National Public Safety Telecommunications Week" and recognize the Yolo Emergency Communications Agency (YECA) for its outstanding service to the residents of Woodland and all of Yolo County.

7. SUBJECT: Approve Consultant Agreement for WPCF Emergency Detention Basin Alternatives Analysis, CIP 26-11

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _______ to:

1.) Approve the reallocation of $300,000 of Sewer Enterprise Funds from WPCF Asset Replacement Project, CIP 14-02 to Water Pollution Asset Replacement (WPCF) Emergency Detention Basin Alternatives Analysis Project, CIP 26-11 for a total budget of $300,000; and

2.) Authorize the City Manager to execute the consultant agreement with Robertson – Bryan, Inc. (RBI) in the amount of $262,867 for the WPCF Emergency Detention Basin Alternatives Analysis Project, CIP 26-11.

8. SUBJECT: Woodland Avenue Alley Abandonment

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. ________, approving a Summary Vacation of the alley within the property lines of 414 Woodland Avenue and authorize the City Manager to execute a quit claim deed for excess right of way.

9. SUBJECT: Approval of an Employment Agreement for a Retired Annuitant and Exception to the CalPERS 180-Day Wait Period

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving an employment agreement and exception to the CalPERS 180-Day wait period for retired annuitant Omar Flores.

10. SUBJECT: Approval of Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Fire Services and Authorization to Execute Agreement for Provision of Fire Protection Services in the Elkhorn Fire Protection District Area

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. , approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Woodland, Springlake Fire Protection District, County of Yolo, and the City of West Sacramento regarding the provision of fire protection services associated with the reorganization of the Elkhorn Fire Protection District; and authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to make minor edits, as necessary, and to execute the MOU and all related agreements, including the Agreement for the Provision of Fire Protection Services in the Elkhorn Fire Protection District service area.

11. SUBJECT: 2026 Reappointment of Staff to Yolo County Waste Advisory Committee

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No.____ approving the appointment of Rosie Ledesma as the City of Woodland’s representative on the Yolo County Waste Advisory Committee for the next four-year term.

12. SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes for February 2026

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the minutes from the February 23, 2026, Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting.

13. SUBJECT: Prohousing Incentive Program Application Authorizaiton

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No.____, authorizing an application for, and receipt of, Prohousing Incentive Program funds.

14. SUBJECT: Approve the Plans, Specifications, and Bid Authorization for the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving the project plans and specifications for the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01 and authorizing the bid advertisement.

15. SUBJECT: Fire Station #4 (CIP 16-10) – Award Design-Build Contract for Phase 1 Pre-construction services to CORE West, Inc.

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____ to authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with CORE West, Inc. for phase 1 pre-construction design services for the Fire

Station #4 progressive design-build project, CIP 16-10, for an amount not to exceed $356,800 and approve a contract contingency of 10% ($35,680).

16. SUBJECT: Reallocation of Previously Approved Affordable Housing Funds to Support the Yolano Donnelly Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. ___,
1) Approving the reallocation of up to $400,000 from the City's previously approved $1,500,000 affordable housing funding commitment for Tupelo Family Apartments to support completion of the Yolano Donnelly Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project ("Project");
2) Directing that the remaining balance of the previously approved commitment, up to $1,500,000, remain available to support Tupelo Family Apartments, subject to the terms and conditions previously approved by the City Council, as outlined in Resolution 8551 (Attachment 2); and
3) Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Grant Agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of Yolo (Yolo County Housing) in an amount up to $400,000 for the Yolano Donnelly Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project in a form prepared and approved by the City Attorney and take such other actions and execute such documents as necessary to make the City grant and ensure completion of the Project.

17. SUBJECT: Authorization for the City’s Participation in SACOG 2026 Federal Funding Programs

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____,
1) Authorizing the City to apply for grant funding through the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) 2026 Federal Funding Programs; 2) Authorizing Community Development staff to establish and submit the City of Woodland’s application priorities for the SACOG 2026 Federal Funding Programs; and
3) Authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary grant documents and ensure timely compliance with project delivery requirements.

18. SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 3, 2026 and March 17, 2026.

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the minutes of the Joint Regular City Council/Woodland Finance Authority Meetings of March 3, 2026 and March 17, 2026.

19. SUBJECT: Support for Budget Request from GGRF for Sustainable Food Biomanufacturing

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council submit a letter of support for Assembly Member Ash Kalra's budget request from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) to establish a research and development grant program for sustainable food and ingredient biomanufacturing in California.

G. REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER

20. SUBJECT: Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council:
1) Receive a presentation from Yolo Transit District staff regarding the Yolo Active Transportation Corridors (YATC) Plan, and
2) Provide feedback and comments to Yolo Transit District regarding the YATC Plan.

21. SUBJECT: SB707 Policy Relating to Disruption of Remote Access Services During Public Meetings

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. ___, approving a policy relating to disruption of remote access services during public meetings.

H. ADJOURN

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Agenda for the Joint Regular Meeting of the Woodland Finance Authority/ City Council of the City of Woodland scheduled for April 7, 2026 was posted on April 2, 2026 in the outside display case at City Hall, 300 First Street, Woodland, CA, and was available to the public during normal business hours.

Marissa Kersey
City Clerk

Upon request, agendas and documents in the agenda packet will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by law. Any such requests must be made in writing to the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Woodland.

Requests will be valid for the calendar year in which the request is received, and must be renewed prior to January 1st.

Persons needing disability-related modifications or accommodations in order to participate in public meetings, including persons requiring auxiliary aids or services, may request such modifications or accommodations by calling the Office of the City Clerk (530-661-5806) at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: D.1
SUBJECT: General Public Comments

This section is reserved for "General" Public Comments emailed within two (2) hours prior to the Council Meeting. These comments will be provided to the City Council and incorporated into the meeting minutes. Any other written communications submitted for items specific to this agenda will be attached as a file to the associated agenda item.

Attachments:

None

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: E.2
SUBJECT: Long Range Calendar

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the Long Range Calendar for informational purposes only.

Attachments:

1. Council Long Range Calendar

CITY COUNCIL LONG RANGE CALENDAR

April 14th SPECIAL MEETING
FY27 Budget Workshop

April 21st (Capital to Capital) NO REGULAR MEETING

May 5th REGULAR MEETING
Closed Session – Gibson Road Improvement Project
Proclamation – Older Americans Month
Proclamation - Woodland Senior Center, Inc. 50th Anniversary Proclamation – Public Works Week
Surplus Lands Act Determination
Military Equipment Use Annual Report
Aquatics Facilities Use Agreement with WJUSD
Presentation from Yolo County HHSA on HR 1 Impacts
Presentation from Yolo County on Youth Empowerment Summit

May 19th REGULAR MEETING
Presentation – Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito & Vector Control District FY27 Measures R and F Spending Plans
FY27 Capital Budget
Housing Element Annual Report
General Plan Urban Limit Line Language Amendment - Final SEIR

June 2nd REGULAR MEETING
Receive report on the 2026 Urban Water Management Plan, CIP 25-06 – Public Hearing Woodland Hotel Business Improvement District – Resolution of Intent to Levy Annual Assessment Public Hearing – Employee Vacancies and Recruitment/Retention Efforts (AB 2561) Introduce FY27 Budget

June 16th REGULAR MEETING
Woodland Hotels Business Improvement District Annual Assessment – Public Hearing Lighting & Landscaping Districts – Resolution of Intent to Levy Annual Assessments FY 26 Budget Adoption

Future Topics / Study Sessions:

City Solar Arrays – Madison Energy PPA Buyout (TBD)
Sewer and Water Rate Adjustment – 218 Hearing (TBD)
Library Eave and Roof Replacement Project - Approve Plans and Authorize Bid (TBD) YoloTD Short Range Transit Plan Presentation (TBD)
Updated 4/2/2026

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.3
SUBJECT: Proclaim April as Child Abuse Prevention Month

Recomendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council proclaim April as Child Abuse Prevention month.

Attachments:

1. Proclamation - Child Abuse Prevention Month

PROCLAMATION
DECLARING APRIL AS “CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH” IN WOODLAND

WHEREAS, child abuse and neglect continue to pose serious threats to our nation’s children; and

WHEREAS, April is dedicated to raising awareness and taking action to prevent child abuse and neglect. Every child deserves to grow up in a safe, nurturing, and stable environment, yet child abuse remains a widespread issue in our communities. However, it is preventable. Each April, communities join the national movement for Child Abuse Prevention (CAP) Month to raise awareness about the preventability of child abuse and take action to support children and families; and

WHEREAS, in 2025, Yolo County Child Welfare Services investigated allegations of suspected child abuse and/or neglect involving 725 children.

While not every allegation was substantiated, 125 Yolo County children entered foster care in 2025, underscoring the ongoing challenges families face. Of particular concern, despite making up only 2.5% of Yolo County’s child population, Black children ages 0–5 accounted for 15% of entries into foster care in 2025, highlighting the urgent need for intentional, culturally responsive prevention efforts; and

WHEREAS, preventing child abuse and neglect is a collective responsibility that requires a community-wide effort. Research shows that strong, supportive relationships can serve as a protective factor against childhood trauma. This year’s CAP Month theme, “Strong Families, Safe Futures,” and tagline, “When We Care Together, Families Thrive,” reflect what the Yolo County Child Abuse Prevention Council (CAPC) knows to be true:
the most effective way to keep children safe is to strengthen the families and communities around them before a crisis ever occurs. Thriving children require connection, collective responsibility, and a community that shows up; and

WHEREAS, the Child Abuse Prevention Council (CAPC) of Yolo County, a Yolo County Children’s Alliance (YCCA) program, coordinates the community’s efforts to prevent and respond to child abuse and neglect. The CAPC provides a forum for interagency cooperation in the prevention, detection, intervention, treatment, and legal processing of child abuse; promotes public awareness of abuse, neglect, and available resources; connects professionals to training; recommends improvements to family services; and mobilizes community support for child abuse prevention programs. Its members include representatives from Child Welfare Services, the criminal justice system, prevention and treatment services, and the broader community; and

WHEREAS, Yolo County residents are encouraged to support child abuse prevention efforts by participating in local activities and initiatives that promote strong, healthy families. The “Strong Families, Safe Futures” campaign invites the entire community to take action this April: wearing blue on April 10 — Wear Blue Day — in solidarity with children and families; visiting Pinwheel Gardens across the county as a symbol of the bright futures every child deserves; participating in the Community Art Project to share a vision of a Yolo County where all families thrive; and amplifying prevention messages throughout the month. We each have a role to play in creating a future free from child abuse and neglect; and

WHEREAS, in Yolo County, over 20 agencies and community organizations are collaborating in their efforts to prevent child abuse and neglect through the YCCA Yolo Family Strengthening Network; and

WHEREAS, providing community-based prevention services can strengthen families and reduce the likelihood of child abuse and neglect. YCCA family strengthening programs include evidence-based home visiting, Family Resource Centers, safety net services, parenting classes and education, developmental screening, subsidized child care, and the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance program (VITA), which returns critical resources directly to families.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Woodland hereby declares the month of April 2026 to be “Child Abuse Prevention Month” in Woodland.

DATED: April 7, 2026

_________________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor

Mayra Vega, Mayor Pro Tempore David Moreno, Council Member

Tania Garcia-Cadena, Council Member Rich Lansburgh, Council Member

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.4
SUBJECT: Proclamation Recognizing Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention in Woodland

SUBJECT: Proclamation Recognizing Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention in Woodland

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a proclamation recognizing sexual assault awareness and prevention in Woodland.

Attachments:

1. Proclamation Recognizing Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention in Woodland

PROCLAMATION

RECOGNIZING SEXUAL ASSAULT AWARENESS AND PREVENTION IN WOODLAND WHEREAS, Sexual violence is an urgent public health and human rights issue that harm individuals, is preventable when communities come together with courage, compassion, and commitment and the City of Woodland believes prevention requires not only intervention after an act of sexual assault occurs, but also proactive, community-driven approaches that address the root causes of violence; and WHEREAS, Community members, families, neighborhoods, and peer leaders/Promotores all play a vital role in shaping environments where healthy, respectful, and equitable relationships can thrive. Empower Yolo has long been a leader in providing critical services to survivors and its Rape Prevention and Education Promotores Program plays a powerful role, engaging trusted community leaders to uplift cultural strengths, foster prevention at the neighborhood level, and help build bridges to safety and healing; and WHEREAS, When we strengthen the economic outcomes of girls and women, we increase independence, opportunity, and resilience, creating pathways that protect against violence and expand choices for the future. When we transform gender norms and nurture values of respect, equality, and shared responsibility amongst genders, we create conditions where violence is less likely to occur and equity becomes the standard; and WHEREAS, The City of Woodland affirms prevention is strongest when rooted in community engagement, culturally relevant education, and partnerships that value the leadership and knowledge of those most impacted; and the City of Woodland recognizes that by investing in community-driven approaches, uplifting survivors, and centering prevention strategies, we can break cycles of harm and foster communities where all people can thrive.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City of Woodland does hereby recognize April 2026 as Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month, and commits to a strength-based, community-wide approach that affirms:

1. Sexual assault and violence are preventable, and every person and community has a role in building a safer future;

2. Promotores are leaders and are essential partners in prevention, engagement, and education,

3. Economic empowerment of girls and women strengthens families and reduces the risk of violence; and

4. Transforming gender norms toward equity, respect, and dignity creates healthier communities for all.

DATED: April 7, 2026
_________________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor

Mayra Vega, Mayor Pro Tempore David Moreno, Council Member

Tania Garcia-Cadena, Council Member Rich Lansburgh, Council Member

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.5
SUBJECT: Proclamation Declaring April 19–25, 2026 as
"National Volunteer Week"

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Proclamation declaring April 19 – 25, 2026 as National Volunteer Week.

Staff Contact:

Victoria Danzl, Police Lieutenant, (530) 661-7860, [email protected]

Discussion:

The City encourages all residents to recognize and thank the volunteers who improve our community.

Attachments:

1. Proclamation - National Volunteer Week

PROCLAMATION
DECLARING APRIL 19 – 25, 2026 AS “NATIONAL VOLUNTEER WEEK” WITH SPECIAL RECOGNITION TO POLICE SERVICES

VOLUNTEERS

WHEREAS, National Volunteer Week was established in 1974 with a presidential executive order, and has continued with every sitting U.S. president issuing a proclamation each year urging Americans to give their time to community outreach organizations; and WHEREAS, volunteers dedicate their time and talents to a wide range of activities, from supporting local organizations to assisting neighbors in need; and WHEREAS, the spirit of volunteerism fosters a sense of civic pride, strengthens community bonds, and promotes a more inclusive and compassionate society; and
WHEREAS, the City of Woodland is committed to supporting and recognizing the efforts of its dedicated volunteers in different organizations throughout the community; and
WHEREAS, the Volunteer In Policing Program provides volunteer support staff to aid sworn and professional personnel in effectively delivering services to the community. Volunteers supplement existing Police Department services, freeing paid employees to perform their necessary duties; and WHEREAS, the Woodland Police Department’s Volunteers In Policing Program are a valued team of trained citizen volunteers who have been assisting the Woodland Police Department since 2006; and
WHEREAS, in 2025, Volunteers in Police Services donated a total of 1,600 hours of service, assisting in community outreach events, department support, car washes, vehicle abatement, graffiti abatement, neighborhood watch meetings, National Night Out, and conducting vacation home checks; and WHEREAS, the City of Woodland recognizes the invaluable contributions of Volunteers in Policing to the strength, dedication, and well-being of our community.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Woodland does hereby declare April 19 – 25, 2026 as National Volunteer Week. The City encourages all residents to recognize and thank the volunteers who improve our community.

DATED: April 7, 2026
_________________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor

Mayra Vega, Mayor Pro Tempore David Moreno, Council Member

Tania Garcia-Cadena, Council Member Rich Lansburgh, Council Member

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.6
SUBJECT: Proclamation Declaring April 12 – 18, 2026 as "National Public Safety Telecommunications Week"

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends the City Council declare April 12 – 18, 2026 as "National Public Safety Telecommunications Week" and recognize the Yolo Emergency Communications Agency (YECA) for its outstanding service to the residents of Woodland and all of Yolo County.

Staff Contact:

Dallas Hyde, Deputy Chief of Police, (530) 661-7868, [email protected]

Discussion:

City staff recognize the Yolo Emergency Communications Agency (YECA) for its outstanding service to the residents of Woodland and all of Yolo County, and extend its appreciation to all YECA staff for their dedication, professionalism, and service to our community.

Attachments:

1. Proclamation-National Public Safety Telecommunications Week

PROCLAMATION
PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 12 – 18, 2026 AS “NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATIONS WEEK” HONORING THE

YOLO EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS AGENCY (YECA)
WHEREAS, National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week is recognized from April 12 – 18, 2026; and WHEREAS, public safety communications professionals are the vital link between our residents and emergency services, serving with dedication, professionalism, and compassion; and
WHEREAS, the Yolo Emergency Communications Agency (YECA) has provided exceptional emergency dispatch and communications services to the residents and public safety agencies of Yolo County since its establishment in 1988; and WHEREAS, YECA serves as the primary Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) for Yolo County, providing critical dispatch services to multiple public safety agencies, including the Woodland Police Department, Woodland Fire Department, West Sacramento Police Department, West Sacramento Fire Department, Winters Police Department, Winters Fire Department, Yocha Dehe Fire Department, and the Yolo County Sheriff’s Office, ensuring that help is dispatched swiftly and efficiently in times of emergency; and WHEREAS, the dedicated professionals at YECA respond to thousands of 9-1-1 and non-emergency calls each year with calm under pressure, accuracy in response, and an unwavering commitment to the safety and well-being of the public and first responders alike; and WHEREAS, the City of Woodland is especially proud of its strong and ongoing partnership with YECA, whose work enhances public safety and saves lives in our community every day; and
WHEREAS, in recognition of the critical role that YECA plays in our regional emergency response system, and in celebration of National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week, we wish to express our deepest gratitude and appreciation for their outstanding service; NOW THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Woodland does hereby declare April 12 – 18, 2026 as “National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week” and commends the Yolo Emergency Communications Agency for its outstanding service to the residents of Woodland and all of Yolo County, and extends its appreciation to all YECA staff for their dedication, professionalism, and service to our community.

DATED: April 7, 2026 _________________________________________ Tom Stallard, Mayor

Mayra Vega, Mayor Pro Tempore David Moreno, Council Member

Tania Garcia-Cadena, Council Member Rich Lansburgh, Council Member

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.7
SUBJECT: Approve Consultant Agreement for WPCF
Emergency Detention Basin Alternatives Analysis,
CIP 26-11

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _______ to:

1.) Approve the reallocation of $300,000 of Sewer Enterprise Funds from WPCF Asset Replacement Project, CIP 14-02 to Water Pollution Asset Replacement (WPCF) Emergency Detention Basin Alternatives Analysis Project, CIP 26-11 for a total budget of $300,000; and

2.) Authorize the City Manager to execute the consultant agreement with Robertson – Bryan, Inc. (RBI) in the amount of $262,867 for the WPCF Emergency Detention Basin Alternatives Analysis Project, CIP 26-11.

Staff Contact:

Tim Busch, Utilities Engineering Manager, (530) 661-5963, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The City has an ongoing capital project, CIP 14-02, Water Pollution Asset Replacement Project, for the repair and replacement of major components of the City’s Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF). The current project budget for the Water Pollution Asset Replacement Project is approximately $1,400,000, in CIP 14-02. The CIP 14-02 budget includes funding for planned replacement and rehabilitation of assets at the WPCF. The initial project budget for the WPCF Emergency Detention Basin Alternatives Analysis Project is $300,000. The design contract in the amount of $262,867 with RBI is fully funded through CIP 26-11.

Staff estimates the total project cost may be in the range of $13 million and $14 million, depending on the results of this evaluation. The evaluation will inform the work needed to meet regulatory requirements. The budget will be updated after this evaluation is completed. At that time, any necessary additional funds would be included in the next sewer rate study. CIP 14-02 is fully funded out of the sewer enterprise fund.

Background:

The WPCF operates under a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit administered through the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The NPDES permit is renewed every 5 years. Erskine Pond is a 40-acre pond that has served as an emergency detention basin for several decades. If there is an upset to the wastewater treatment process or another event that may affect treatment, screened untreated wastewater can be discharged to the pond. This occurs a few times each year and generally occurs for less than 1 hour per event. The 2020 NPDES permit reclassified this activity as a new discharge to land because the untreated wastewater is not returned into the WPCF for treatment and the permit required the City to address the issue or construct a proper emergency detention basin by 2030. The RWQCB is concerned with the potential for groundwater contamination because the untreated wastewater remains in the pond. The City conducted a pilot test of a treatment process that would allow the pond water to be returned for treatment. The pilot test did not work due to high levels of algae in the pond.

Staff has a cost estimate for an emergency detention pond that would cost around $13 million and

include construction of a concrete-lined pond, groundwater pump station, untreated sewage pump station and a pressure wash system. Staff is proposing that our consultant investigate other alternatives to see if there is a less expensive option.

The NPDES permit was due for renewal in 2025 and Staff have spent the past year working with the RWQCB on the new permit. The new NPDES permit was adopted on February 27, 2026. The requirements for Erskine Pond were modified to allow for an alternatives analysis to be completed and delayed completion of construction of an emergency detention basin to 2036. The alternative analysis will evaluate utilizing the existing clay soils as the liner material and a few other options in an effort to reduce the cost of compliance with the NPDES requirements.

Discussion:

RBI was selected for the project through a quality-based selection process and is on the City’s on-call list for regulatory compliance work at the WPCF. RBI has engaged in similar work at the WPCF in recent years and has expertise in wastewater treatment pond systems and groundwater regulatory compliance activities. RBI has recently engaged in the studies and analyses, along with Luhdorff & Scalmanini, to prove that the solids handling ponds and Erskine Pond at the WPCF are not contaminating groundwater with nitrates as part of the CVSALTS program.

The scope of work generally includes geotechnical investigations around the perimeter of Erskine Pond to determine whether the existing clays already reduce the seepage to groundwater to less than what is required in the NPDES permit or if the clay can be recompacted to achieve the requirement. The elevation of the existing pond bottom and therefore water depth in the pond is not known and there have been decades of sediment buildup in the pond. The scope includes a bathymetric survey to understand the elevation of the pond bottom and depth of accumulated sediment. The alternatives analysis will evaluate several options to achieve the required seepage rate and sizing options for the emergency detention basin and remainder of Erskine Pond.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _______ to:

1.) Approve the reallocation of $300,000 of Sewer Enterprise Funds from WPCF Asset Replacement Project, CIP 14-02 to Water Pollution Asset Replacement (WPCF) Emergency Detention Basin Alternatives Analysis Project, CIP 26-11 for a total budget of $300,000; and

2.) Authorize the City Manager to execute the consultant agreement with Robertson – Bryan, Inc. (RBI) in the amount of $262,867 for the WPCF Emergency Detention Basin Alternatives Analysis Project, CIP 26-11.

Prepared by: Tim Busch, Utilities Engineering Manager

Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, City Engineer / Community Development Director

Attachments:

1. FNL - Woodland WPCF EDB Alts Analysis Proposal 20251212

2. Proposed Resolution - CIP 26-11

3100 Zinfandel Drive, Suite 300
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Phone 916.714.1801
Fax 916.714.1804
www.robertson-bryan.com

December 12, 2025

Mr. Tim Busch, P.E.

Principal Utilities Civil Engineer
City of Woodland
300 First Street
Woodland, CA 95695
Subject: Proposal to Provide Professional Services to the City of Woodland for an Emergency Detention Basin Alternatives Analysis
Dear Mr. Busch:

As requested, please accept this proposal for Robertson-Bryan, Inc. (RBI) to provide engineering and consulting services to the City of Woodland (City) for an alternatives analysis for an emergency detention basin (EDB) to be constructed at the City’s Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF).

The City is currently in the process of renewing the WPCF’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. This renewed NPDES permit is expected in early 2026.

The City has received a draft of the renewed NPDES permit that contains requirements associated with construction of an EDB with a liner that meets a 10 -6 cm/s hydraulic
conductivity requirement for sewage pond liners. The EDB is to be used for emergency and maintenance diversions, for which the WPCF’s Erskine Pond is currently used. Erskine Pond is an unlined wastewater storage pond that receives peak and emergency flows from the WPCF and is also used for algae production to assist with sludge stabilization. Water in Erskine Pond is typically a combination of untreated wastewater, rainwater, and secondary effluent. The hydraulic conductivity of the existing Erskine Pond bottom is currently unknown. The draft NPDES permit states that the City will construct the EDB by 2036, which allows time for completing an alternatives analysis, engineering design, securement of funding for the project, and construction.

Construction of a lined EDB is a significant undertaking for the City that likely has a substantial capital cost. As such, the City desires to investigate EDB configuration and lining alternatives, such that the EDB solution chosen for construction is both effective for operational needs and capital cost. This proposal is for RBI to conduct an alternatives analysis for the NPDES permit-required EDB, which will involve a sizing analysis for the EDB and analysis of various EDB configuration and lining options. A geotechnical investigation of the existing Erskine Pond to determine its ability to meet the NPDES permit-specified hydraulic conductivity requirements will be performed by our geotechnical subconsultant, Crawford & Associates, Inc. (Crawford). Lastly, a bathymetric survey of Erskine Pond will be performed by our surveying subconsultant, Sierra Land Surveying.

The scope of work for these proposed efforts is provided below.

Mr. Tim Busch, P.E.

City of Woodland
December 12, 2025

I. SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 1: REVIEW EXISTING DOCUMENTATION
Under this task, RBI will review available documentation pertaining to the Erskine Pond to inform RBI’s efforts conducted under subsequent tasks of this scope of work. Our review will include pond construction documents, soil maps, groundwater information, and Erskine Pond operational data. Additionally, RBI may discuss historical operations of Erskine Pond with WPCF operators and other City staff. Budget under this task is provided for RBI staff to perform one (1) site visit to the WPCF to obtain/review pond documentation, discuss pond operations with WPCF staff, and document existing pond conditions needed to facilitate additional project efforts.

TASK 2: EDB SIZING ANALYSIS
Under this task, RBI will perform an analysis to size the EDB to meet both the NPDES permit’s specified capacity requirements and the WPCF’s operational needs. To do this, RBI will request, review, and analyze operational data associated with wastewater flows to Erskine Pond, weather data for the WPCF site, and discuss emergency diversion and maintenance diversion frequencies and flow with WPCF operations staff. RBI will also discuss EDB storage capacity goals with WPCF staff to determine if additional storage capacity is desired by the City. Using this information, RBI will prepare a water balance for the EDB to develop the optimal EDB volume. This EDB volume will be used for the EDB alternatives development and analysis performed under Task 4 of the scope. This deliverable will be included as an appendix to the final Technical Memorandum (TM) produced under Task 5.

Deliverable: EDB Sizing Water Balance
TASK 3: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND BATHYMETRIC SURVEY Under this task, RBI will oversee and direct our geotechnical engineer subconsultant, Crawford, on soil sampling on the Erskine Pond levees and laboratory testing. This testing has two primary goals: 1) identify soil characteristics in and around Erskine Pond that may impact EDB alternatives development (i.e., soil characteristics that may influence alternatives development and/or construction activities), and 2) identify if the existing pond bottom material currently meets the hydraulic conductivity requirement (10 -6 cm/s to a depth of two
or more feet) or if it can be engineered (i.e., compacted) to meet this requirement. This sampling/testing will evaluate whether the pond bottom is consistent throughout or if the pond contains a discontinuous bottom (i.e., different soil characteristics within different areas of the pond). Laboratory testing of the soil samples will include sieve analysis with hydrometer, organic content, moisture content, Atterberg limits, compaction, laboratory hydraulic conductivity on the relatively undisturbed samples, and laboratory hydraulic conductivity on samples remolded at three relative compactions and moisture contents. Crawford will also perform sludge depth measurements throughout Erskine Pond to inform potential sludge removal needs for future EDB construction.

Mr. Tim Busch, P.E.

City of Woodland
December 12, 2025

To provide the most cost-effective geotechnical investigation to the City, the geotechnical investigation performed under this scope will primarily serve the needs of the alternatives analysis. The geotechnical investigation will be limited to the Erskine Pond levees and no water-based borings will be performed within Erskine Pond.

Additional geotechnical investigation beyond that completed under this scope will be needed for the specific purposes of design and construction of the EDB. At the City’s request, RBI considered whether this could be completed within the alternatives analysis, but recommends completing it in the design phase of the project. The reasoning for this is that the design/construction geotechnical investigation will be focused within the footprint of the EDB to be constructed so that a thorough understanding of site soil conditions is achieved within the construction area. It is not cost-effective to perform this thorough geotechnical investigation under this scope because the exact design and footprint of the EDB is not yet known and only a conceptual design will be achieved through the efforts of this scope.

However, information gathered from the geotechnical investigation conducted under this scope will provide value during the design/construction efforts and likely offset some aspects of the geotechnical investigation to be conducted at that later time.

RBI’s efforts performed under this task will include coordination with Crawford and City staff on soil sample collection, overseeing sample collection, review of soil sampling test results, review of reports produced from geotechnical investigation activities, and directing project staff on next steps.

Additionally, the City desires to conduct a bathymetric survey of Erskine Pond to determine the pond’s operational depth and estimate sludge accumulation within the pond. It is RBI’s understanding that a bathymetric survey of Erskine Pond has not been conducted in several decades; therefore, this information will be useful in future developments regarding the fate of Erskine Pond. This survey will be conducted by RBI’s surveying subconsultant, Sierra Land Surveying. The outcome of this surveying effort will be a CAD file (.dwg file extension) and PDF of the Erskine Pond bathymetry. Budget is provided for RBI to facilitate the bathymetric survey of the pond.

Deliverables:
• Geotechnical report (by Crawford)
• Erskine Pond Bathymetry Files (CAD and PDF)
TASK 4: EDB ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT AND ANALYSIS
Using the information gathered from Tasks 1–3 of this scope, RBI will develop alternatives for the EDB. These alternatives are expected to include various EDB configurations, liner materials, inlet and outlet locations, necessary flow monitoring, and return infrastructure options for conveying water within the EDB back to the plant for treatment. Input from City staff will be sought during this process to ensure that alternatives developed are consistent with City staff goals for the EDB.

Mr. Tim Busch, P.E.

City of Woodland
December 12, 2025

The EDB is likely to be constructed within the footprint of the existing Erskine Pond; however, it is anticipated that the ultimate EDB will be substantially smaller than Erskine Pond (40 acres). The City has expressed interest in constructing a partitioned pond, in which water first enters a smaller pond for solids settling prior to entering a larger pond that provides the majority of required storage. Various configurations within this framework are likely to exist. Additionally, there are several different liner materials that can meet the 10 -6 cm/s
hydraulic conductivity requirement (e.g., concrete, HPDE, compacted clay, etc.) that should be evaluated for their suitability to the site, plant operations/maintenance impacts, and achievement of the primary purpose of the EDB. Further, the geotechnical investigation may reveal that either the native pond bottom or amendment of native material can meet the hydraulic conductivity requirement, which may present cost benefits to the City. Lastly, conveyance of wastewater to and from the EDB can be achieved through various means (i.e., gravity or pumped flow), for which RBI will develop alternatives.

For each of the alternatives, RBI will develop metrics to evaluate each alternative in the following assessment categories:
- Constructability
- Operational requirements
- Maintenance requirements
- Reliability
- Environmental sustainability/benefits
- Cost (20-year net present value analysis)
o Operational/maintenance costs
o Capital cost (materials and construction)
It is anticipated that each alternative will be scored/ranked in the assessment categories and then given an overall score, which may be weighted based on priority of each assessment category (e.g., maintenance requirements may have higher priority than environmental sustainability). RBI will then prepare a detailed outline and conceptual layout drawing(s) for each alternative to facilitate discussion with City staff.

Upon completing the initial evaluation of each alternative, RBI will meet with City staff to discuss the alternatives, review the layout drawings, and review the preliminary scoring. RBI will then revise, where applicable, the scoring of each alternative based on feedback from City staff. The detailed outlines, layout drawings, and evaluation of alternatives completed under this task will be utilized in the TM produced under Task 5 of this scope.

Deliverables: Alternatives Outline, Layout Drawing(s), and Evaluation TASK 5: TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
The work completed within Tasks 1–4 of this scope will be summarized in a TM to communicate the results of the alternatives analysis. The TM will provide a detailed description of each EDB alternative and the alternatives evaluation conducted. The TM will also present a summary of the findings from the geotechnical investigation performed by Crawford. Finally, the TM will provide a recommended alternative to construct. This

Mr. Tim Busch, P.E.

City of Woodland
December 12, 2025

recommendation will be based on the analysis performed and City feedback. A draft of the TM will be provided to the City for review and discussion. RBI will finalize and issue the TM upon receipt of the City’s review.

Deliverables: Technical Memorandum
TASK 5: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
This task primarily provides hours for RBI’s project management team to oversee and direct RBI staff and subconsultant efforts on each task, to hold key conversations with City staff and agency staff when needed, and to review interim work products. In addition, this task provides time for project coordination by phone, email, and video conference with other project team members, budget and schedule tracking, invoicing, and other duties to coordinate/administer the project.

II. ASSUMPTIONS: WATER-BASED GEOTECHNICAL BORINGS
The geotechnical investigation conducted under this scope will be limited to the Erskine Pond levees and no water-based borings will be performed. It is anticipated that the levee-based borings will provide the information necessary to meet the goals of this scope. If it is later determined that additional information is needed from water-based borings to complete the alternatives analysis, RBI will discuss the need for this additional geotechnical investigation with the City, prepare a budget augmentation request for the effort, and receive written authorization from the City to proceed with the work.

III. SCHEDULE
RBI can begin providing professional services associated with the tasks defined herein upon receipt of a signed contract or written authorization to proceed.

Mr. Tim Busch, P.E.

City of Woodland
December 12, 2025

IV. CONTRACT AND BILLING ARRANGEMENT
RBI will complete the scope of work defined herein on a time-and-materials basis, with an authorized budget as shown in Attachment 1. RBI will not exceed the authorized budget amount without written approval. RBI will invoice the City monthly according to the fee schedule in Attachment 2 for all RBI work activities completed in the prior month.

Crawford’s and Sierra Land Surveying’s letter proposals to serve as RBI’s subconsultants are provided in Attachments 3 and 4, respectively, and are incorporated into RBI’s budget provided in Attachment 1.

If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me at (916) 224-6271. We look forward to assisting the City with this important project.

Sincerely,

Paul Bedore, M.S. Cyle Moon, M.S., P.E.

Director of Wastewater & Senior Engineer &
Stormwater Regulatory Services Project Manager

Attachment 1: RBI Budget
Attachment 2: 2026 Fee Schedule
Attachment 3: Crawford & Associates, Inc. Letter Proposal Attachment 4: Sierra Land Surveying Letter Proposal

ATTACHMENT 1

RBI BUDGET

ATTACHMENT 2
2026 FEE SCHEDULE
Charges for project work performed by Robertson- Bryan, Inc. (RBI) will be calculated and billed at the hourly rates shown below.

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RATE/HOUR
♦ Managing Partner $371.00
♦ Partner $363.00
♦ Managing Principal Engineer/Scientist $353.00
♦ Principal Engineer/Scientist $335.00
♦ Resource Director $320.00
♦ Associate $309.00
♦ Senior Engineer/Scientist II $301.00
♦ Senior Engineer/Scientist I $286.00
♦ Project Engineer/Scientist III $262.00
♦ Project Engineer/Scientist II $251.00
♦ Project Engineer/Scientist I $229.00
♦ Staff Engineer/Scientist II $213.00
♦ Staff Engineer/Scientist I $196.00
♦ Technical Analyst $183.00
♦ Graphics/GIS $162.00
♦ Laboratory Compliance Specialist $158.00
♦ Administrative Assistant $122.00
♦ Intern $80.00
Up to ten percent (10%) of subcontractor charges will be added to cover administrative costs .

Hourly rates will be increased by a minimum of fifty percent (50%) for depositions, trials, and hearings. Rates will be adjusted annually. Rates are adjusted annually, effective December 16th.

Invoices will be issued on a monthly basis for all work performed on a project. Payment is due upon receipt of the invoice.

ATTACHMENT 3
CRAWFORD & ASSOCIATES, INC. LETTER PROPOSAL

Main:
(916) 455 -4225
Corporate Office:
4701 Freeport Boulevard
Sacramento, CA 95822
www.crawford -inc.com
December 10, 2025
Crawford File No. 25-1565.P

Geotechnical Services r3
City of Woodland Erskine Pond
Woodland, CA

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
It is our understanding that the approximate 40-acre unlined Erskine Pond (roughly 1,300 feet by 1,300 feet) needs to be evaluated for infiltration potential and sludge thickness. This information will ultimately be used by Roberton -Bryan, Inc. (RBI) to determine if the infiltration meets regulatory requirements to remain unlined (with a hydraulic conductivity of no slower than 10 -6 cm/sec) or if lining will be required. The lining needs to be conducive to maintenance by City staff and could consist of a HDPE lining , chemically-treated soil, or other type. In addition, t he perimeter levees will be raised by less than 3 feet. The current sludge thickness at the bottom of the pond is unknown but needs to be determined for liner support. The City does not want to dewater or desludge the pond for this investigation; a bathymetry survey will be performed by others. Based on the provided 1975 topography for the Erskine Pond, the levee crest was shown to be elev 34.5 feet and the pond bottom ranged from elev 24 to 26 f eet, with discharge points between elev 22 and 24.4 feet.

The current pond capacity is more than needed, and the pond volume might be reduced . If a reduction is needed, an additional levee(s) might be constructed in the current pond interior. It is desired to have the pond drain by gravity flow to a point as close to the current headworks as possible.

Based on geologic mapping , the site is underlain by Quaternary basin deposits flanked by deposits of the Riverbank formation; both include silt, clay, and sand. USDA data indicates the site area could be predominately clay in the upper 6 to 8 feet . Historical groundwater levels in the greater site vicinity have ranged from 20 feet deep to near surface and typically vary over the seasons and with groundwater pumping.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Crawford propose the following tasks as part of our geotechnical scope:

Task 1 Levee Raise and Sludge Investigation
Task 1 .1 PM, Coordination, Permitting, and Field Preparation Crawford will:
• Provide project management throughout the project.
• Attend the kick-off meeting.
• Meet with the design team to review the preliminary plans and discuss the project design needs, goals, and schedule.
• Determine exploration locations and site access and mark the locations for USA North 811. • Obtain Yolo County Boring and Well Permits for soil borings and piezometers. • Coordinate the drilling subcontractor.

Geotechnical Services r3 December 10, 2025
City of Woodland Erskine Pond Crawford File No. 25-1565.P Woodland, CA

2 Task 1.2 Subsurface Exploration
Crawford will conduct a land-based and over-water subsurface exploration program to understand the subsurface conditions around the pond and to measure sludge thickness.

Land-Based Borings
Borings will be advanced around the perimeter of the pond to collect data to analyze the levee raise and perform seepage testing. Considering USACE guidance on explorations for levees not exceeding 1,000 feet in consistent geology, Crawford will drill, log and sample eight borings (two per side) through the existing pond embankment (levee) to depths of 30 to 50 feet, which should be approximately 20 to 40 feet below the bottom of pond (mudline).

The drilling contractor will advance borings with a rubber-tired, truck and/or track mounted drill rig using 6 to 8 -inch-diameter hollow, solid stem augers, and/or rotary wash methods. Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and California Modified sampling will be performed within borings to obtain samples and blow count information. A Crawford engineer/geologist will direct the sampling, log the borings , and retain samples for visual classification and field and laboratory testing . At a minimum, we will sample at 2-foot intervals from 0 to 20 feet, then at 5-foot intervals thereafter.

Bulk samples of the existing embankment material will also be collected. Surface and groundwater conditions will be noted where encountered. The borings will be backfilled per County requirements.

To obtain data to develop infiltration rates, Crawford will perform infiltration rate testing in the field using the falling head method at up to four locations (one per side). Approximately 15-foot deep open standpipe piezometers will be constructed per County guidelines to perform the testing within; the depth could vary depending on the conditions encountered. The piezometers will be filled with water to above the approximate pond water level and a water level datalogger will be placed at the bottom of the piezometer to record the water level drop over time until a consistent rate is established. The piezometers will be left in place after testing.

Over-Water Measurements, Sampling, and Testing
Crawford will obtain depth to top of sludge measurements across the pond in 9 to 16 locations in our small hand-launched boat. In each location, we will perform dynamic cone penetrometer testing to measure resistance of the sludge and underlying native soil to estimate the bottom of sludge level and sludge thickness. We will also hand auger through the sludge to attempt to obtain samples of the native material unless caving prevents sample collection.

As we progress around the pond, a 3rd party surveyor will accompany our staff in our boat to obtain bathymetric survey data.

Task 1.3 Laboratory Testing
Crawford will complete the following laboratory tests on soil samples obtained from the exploratory borings (as appropriate):
• Moisture Content and Unit Weight.
• Sieve Analysis and Plasticity Index.
• Hydraulic Conductivity.
• Unconfined Compressive Strength and/or Direct Shear.
• Compaction.

Geotechnical Services r3 December 10, 2025
City of Woodland Erskine Pond Crawford File No. 25-1565.P Woodland, CA

3 Task 1.4 Engineering Evaluation and Analysis and Report Preparation Crawford will perform engineering evaluation and analysis for:
• sludge thickness.
• seepage (through and underseepage).
• slope stability of proposed conditions (end of construction, steady state seepage, pseudo- static).
• liquefaction potential.
• settlement (static and seismic).

Crawford will prepare a draft Geotechnical Report for review and comment by the design team .

The report will include:
• a project description,
• site description,
• summary of site geology,
• subsurface exploration details,
• subsurface materials and groundwater,
• field and laboratory tests,
• sludge depth and volume,
• infiltration rates and discussion, including input for lining alternatives, if necessary. • liquefaction and seismic settlement,
• seepage and slope stability results,
• static settlement,
• recommendations for earthwork construction of the levee raise including, suitability of the existing levee (for foundation support and suitability for reuse) , levee foundation preparation, compaction, penetrations, volume shrinkage , slope inclinations and scour potential, and import fill.
• recommendations for liner subgrade preparation,
• recommendations for further exploration and study, if applicable, and • exploration map, boring logs, and laboratory test results.

Following receipt of review comments, Crawford will prepare a final Geotechnical Report.

DELIVERABLES: DRAFT AND FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Task 1.5 Consultation s
Following issuance of the geotechnical report, Crawford will be available for consultations and meetings. We have budgeted 16 hours for this task.

Optional Task 2 – New Inter ior Levee
Task 2.1 PM, Coordination, Permitting, and Field Preparation Crawford will:
• Provide project management throughout the project.
• Meet with the design team to review the preliminary plans and discuss the project design needs, goals, and schedule.
• Determine exploration locations and mark the locations for USA North 811. • Obtain a Yolo County Boring Permit for soil borings.

Geotechnical Services r3 December 10, 2025
City of Woodland Erskine Pond Crawford File No. 25-1565.P Woodland, CA

4 • Coordinate the drilling subcontractor.

Task 2.2 Subsurface Exploration: Over -Water Borings
Crawford will conduct a n over -water subsurface exploration program to understand the subsurface conditions in the pond interior for the new interior levee . Crawford will drill, log and sample up to four borings to depths of 30 to 40 feet below the mudline . Depth to top of sludge and approximate bottom of sludge will be recorded.

The drilling contractor will advance borings with a track-mounted drill rig on a barge using 6 to 8- inch-diameter hollow, solid stem augers, and/or rotary wash methods. Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) and California Modified sampling will be performed within borings to obtain samples and blow count information. A Crawford e ngineer/geologist will direct the sampling , log the borings, and retain samples for visual classification and field and laboratory testing . At a minimum, we will sample at 2 -foot inte rvals to 15 feet below mudline and at 5 -foot intervals thereafter. Surface and groundwater conditions will be noted where encountered. The borings will be backfilled per County requirements.

Task 2.3 Laboratory Testing
Crawford will complete the following laboratory tests on soil samples obtained from the exploratory borings (as appropriate):
• Moisture Content and Unit Weight.
• Sieve Analysis and Plasticity Index.
• Hydraulic Conductivity.
• Unconfined Compressive Strength and/or Direct Shear.

Task 2.4 Engineering Evaluation and Analysis and Report Preparation Crawford will perform engineering evaluation and analysis focusing on the interior levee:
• sludge thickness
• seepage (through and underseepage)
• slope stability of proposed conditions (end of construction, steady state seepage, pseudo- static)
• liquefaction potential
• settlement (static and seismic)

Crawford will update the Geotechnical Report in Task 1.4 above for review and comment by the design team. The report will include the items listed in Task 1.4 above, focusing on the additional analyses and updates to conclusions and recommendations as they apply to the new interior levee. Following receipt of review comments, Crawford will prepare a final Updated Geotechnical Report.

DELIVERABLES: DRAFT AND FINAL UPDATED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Task 2.5 Consultations
Following issuance of the updated geotechnical report, Crawford will be available for consultations and meetings. We have budgeted 8 hours for this task.

Geotechnical Services r3 December 10, 2025
City of Woodland Erskine Pond Crawford File No. 25-1565.P Woodland, CA

5 COSTS
The costs for Task 1 are detailed in the attached cost breakdown.

The costs for the Optional Task 2 are estimated to be $75,000 to $100,000 and will require confirmation after the completion of Task 1.

ASSUMPTIONS
Crawford assumes the following:
• Access and/or rights-of-entry will be provided.
• The pond will be deep enough to operate the small boat and drill rig barge. • Topographic and bathymetric survey data will be obtained by others. • No contaminated soil or groundwater issues are present that would require containment of the geotechnical drill cuttings;
• Drill cuttings will be spread on-site at each boring location or in the pond, based on input from City staff on location.
• Destruction of piezometers, if needed, will be at an additional cost. • An evaluation of a borrow source is not included.

SCHEDULE
For Task 1, the permitting and exploration preparation testing will begin immediately after we are under contract. The drilling subcontractors are booked out approximately 4 to 6 weeks, and we would expect to complete the exploration with 8 weeks of being under contract. Laboratory testing should be completed in 4 to 6 weeks after exploration, depending on how many hydraulic conductivity tests are needed. The draft geotechnical report will be completed approximately 4 weeks after completion of laboratory testing. Therefore, we estimate the time to issue a draft report to be 14 to 18 weeks after contract execution.

Task 2 would have roughly the same schedule and would not be initiated until a contract amendment is in place and direction is given by RBI.

Project Name:City of Woodland Erskine PondCounty/City:Woodland, CAServices:Geotechnical r3 Date:12/10/2025 Principal *
Senior Project Manager *
Project Manager II
Project Manager I
Senior Engineer II
Senior Engineer I
Senior Geologist
Project Engineer III / Geologist III
Project Engineer II / Geologist II
Project Engineer I / Geologist I
Staff Engineer / Geologist
Drafter
Project Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Laborer Technician **Hourly Rate 275.00$ 255.00$ 245.00$ 210.00$ 225.00$ 205.00$ 180.00$ 180.00$ 160.00$ 150.00$ 140.00$ 125.00$ 135.00$ 115.00$ 145.00$ TASK NO. 1.1PM, Coordination, Permitting, and Field Preparation2.0016.00 4.00 8.00 16.004.004.00 54.0010,130.00$ $ 3,742.00 13,872.00$ Task 1 - Hours2.0016.000.000.000.004.000.008.000.000.0016.000.004.004.000.0054.0010,130.00$ $ 3,742.00 13,872.00$ TASK NO. 1.2 -$ Subsurface Exploration 2.00 6.00 60.0040.00 20.00128.0019,840.00$ $ 67,311.00 87,151.00$ Task 2 - Hours0.002.000.000.000.006.000.000.0060.000.0040.000.000.000.0020.00128.0019,840.00$ $ 67,311.00 87,151.00$ TASK NO. 1.3 -$ Laboratory Testing 1.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 8.001,340.00$ $ 10,925.00 12,265.00$ Task 3 - Hours0.001.000.000.000.001.000.000.002.000.004.000.000.000.000.008.001,340.00$ $ 10,925.00 12,265.00$ TASK NO. 1.4 -$ Engineering Evaluation, Analysis and Report Preparation1.0016.00 24.00 32.0040.008.00 121.0020,995.00$ $ - 20,995.00$ Task 4 - Hours1.0016.000.000.000.0024.000.000.0032.000.0040.008.000.000.000.00121.0020,995.00$ -$ 20,995.00$ TASK NO. 1.5 -$ Consultations 8.00 8.00 16.003,680.00$ $ - 3,680.00$ Task 6 - Hours0.008.000.000.000.008.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.0016.003,680.00$ -$ 3,680.00$ Subtotal- Hours/Tasks3.0043.000.000.000.0043.000.008.0094.000.00100.008.004.004.0020.00327.00 Overtime and Graveyard Charges May Apply 55,985.00$ (*) Indicates Key Staff 81,978.00$ (**) Indicates Prevailing Wage Classifications TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE: 137,963.00$ TOTAL COST PER TASK HOURS PER TASKCrawford & Associates, Inc. Tasks and Descriptions OTHER DIRECT COSTS:TOTAL LABOR COST:LABOR COST PER TASK

OTHER DIRECT COSTS

Crawford & Associates - Other Direct Costs 12/10/2025
Task 1.1PM, Coordination, Permitting, and Field Preparation

DESCRIPTION QUANTITYUNIT UNIT COST MULT TOTAL
Mileage 50 Mile 0.74$ 1 37.00$
Vehicle Charge 1 Day 25.00$ 1 25.00$
Environmental Health Permit 1 Cost 3,200.00$ 1.15 3,680.00$ EDR Cost 700.00$ 1.15 -$
1 -$
Task 1 ODC Total: $ 3,742.00
Task 1.2Subsurface Exploration

DESCRIPTION QUANTITYUNIT UNIT COST MULT TOTAL
Mileage 250 Mile 0.74$ 1 185.00$
Vehicle Charge 6 Day 25.00$ 1 150.00$
Drilling Rig & Crew - Land 6 Day 8,500.00$ 1.15 58,650.00$ Drilling Rig & Crew - Barge Day 15,000.00$ 1.15 -$ Crane to Launch Barge Each 12,000.00$ 1.15 -$
Steel Liners 90 Liner 12.00$ 1 1,080.00$ Piezometer Materials 4 Each 750.00$ 1 3,000.00$ Hand Auger 2 Day 210.00$ 1 420.00$
Wildcat DCP Equipment ** 2 Day 785.00$ 1 1,570.00$ Wildcat DCP Tips 16 Each 21.00$ 1 336.00$ Percolation / Infiltration Testing Equipment 2 Day 210.00$ 1 420.00$ Boat Rental 2 Day 750.00$ 1 1,500.00$
1 -$
1 -$
Task 2 ODC Total: $ 67,311.00
Task 1.3Laboratory Testing

DESCRIPTION QUANTITYUNIT UNIT COST MULT TOTAL
#200 Wash (D1140) 9 Each 125.00$ 1 1,125.00$ Atterberg Limits / Plasticity Index (D4318) 4 Each 270.00$ 1 1,080.00$ Cleanness Value (CT 227) Each 250.00$ 1 -$ Corrosivity Testing (pH, Resistivity, Sulfate, Chloride) Each 250.00$ 1 -$ Corrosivity Testing w/Redox (pH, Resistivity, Sulfate, Chloride)Each 365.00$ 1 -$ Durability Index (D3744, CT 229) Each 390.00$ 1 -$ Expansion Index Each 285.00$ 1 -$
Hydrometer Analysis (D7928) Each 285.00$ 1 -$ Landscape Suitability Each 130.00$ 1 -$
Mass Grain Size, Scour (D6913) Each 2,300.00$ 1 -$ Moisture & Density (D2216, D7263) 36 Each 85.00$ 1 3,060.00$ Moisture Content (D2216, CT 226) Each 55.00$ 1 -$ Non-Plastic Index Result (D4318) Each 140.00$ 1 -$ Organic Matter (D2974) Each 135.00$ 1 -$
Percent Crushed Particles (CT 205) Each 245.00$ 1 -$ R-Value (D2844, CT 301) Each 450.00$ 1 -$ Sand Equivalent (D2419, CT 217) Each 165.00$ 1 -$ Sieve Analysis (CT 202) Each 220.00$ 1 -$ Sieve Analysis to #200 (D6913) 2 Each 165.00$ 1 330.00$ Sieve Analysis with Hydrometer (D6913, D7928) Each 450.00$ 1 -$ Unconfined Compression, Soil (D2166) 4 Each 240.00$ 1 960.00$ Hydraulic Conductivity (D5084) 4 Each 600.00$ 1 2,400.00$ Direct Shear - 3 Point (D3080) 2 Each 450.00$ 1 900.00$ Compaction (6" Proctor) 2 Each 535.00$ 1 1,070.00$ Task 3 ODC Total: $ 10,925.00
81,978.00$ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS

PROJECT MANAGEMENT HOURLY RATEREIMBURSABLES RATE
Principal 275.00$ Mileage $ 0.74 / Mile
Senior Project Manager 255.00$ Vehicle Charge $ 25.00 / Day Project Manager II 245.00$ Outside Costs 15% Markup Project Manager I 210.00$ Permit Fees (City/County)15% Markup Per Diem (Lodging & Meals)$ 350 / Day
ENGINEER / GEOLOGIST HOURLY RATERush Lab Testing 50% Markup Senior Engineer II 225.00$
Senior Engineer I 205.00$ ENGINEERING FIELD EQUIPMENTRATE DETAIL Senior Geologist 180.00$ Backfill 9.00$ Bag Project Engineer III / Geologist III 180.00$ Core Box 18.00$ Each Project Engineer II / Geologist II 160.00$ Core Machine Bit 3.00$ Inch Project Engineer I / Geologist I 150.00$ Core Machine with Generator2,700.00$ Day Staff Engineer / Geologist 140.00$ Hand Auger 210.00$ Day Drafter 125.00$ Hot Mix Asphalt Patching (1st Core)1,050.00$ First Hot Mix Asphalt Patching (2 or More) 500.00$ Each After PROJECT SUPPORT HOURLY RATEPercolation/Infiltration Testing Equipment210.00$ Day Project Coordinator 135.00$ Steel Liners (MCAL) 12.00$ Each Administrative Assistant 115.00$ Survey Equipment (Liquid Level)155.00$ Day Survey Equipment (Tripod, Level, Rod)155.00$ DayMATERIALS TESTING & CONSTRUCTION SERVICESHOURLY RATETraffic Control - Major (Non DBE, Non-PW)1,750.00$ DayConstruction Services Director 255.00$ Traffic Control - Minor (Non-DBE, Non-PW)735.00$ Day Special Inspector 138.00$ Traffic Control Equipment (Shoulder signs, cones)210.00$ Day Senior Technician 120.00$ Traffic Control Sign Board 650.00$ Day Staff Technician 110.00$ Wildcat DCP Equipment 785.00$ Day Wildcat DCP Tip 21.00$ Each

PREVAILING WAGE HOURLY RATE
Group 1 - Special Inspector I (Masonry) 200.00$ SEISMIC ANALYSIS RATE DETAIL Group 2 - Special Inspector II ( Welding) 195.00$ EZ Frisk Software Use 2,350.00$ Per Location Group 2 and 3 - Laborer Technician 145.00$ Seismic Survey Equipment (24 channel)1,835.00$ Day Group 3 - Soils/Asphalt Technician 185.00$ Seismic Data Processing (1dS)145.00$ Per Line Group 4 - Concrete Technician 175.00$ Seismic Data Processing (2dS)450.00$ Per Line Seismic Data Processing (2dS w/CA Stamp)1,375.00$ Per Line

WORKING HOURS AND PREMIUM TIMERATE
MATERIALS TESTING EQUIPMENTRate DetailConcrete Testing Equipment (Slump, Unit Wt, Air)65.00$ Day Torque Wrench 25.00$ Day
Bolt tensioning Device - Skidmore 65.00$ Day 4x8 Cylinder Mold 10.00$ Ea
6x12 Cylinder Mold 12.00$ Ea
Proof Load Ram and Pump 55.00$ Day
Sand Cone Equipment 7.00$ Ea
Moisture Emission Test Kit 75.00$ Ea
NDT Weld Testing Equipment UT/MT/PT75.00$ Day Nuclear Density Guage 25.00$ Day
CRAWFORD & ASSOCIATES - 2025 FEE SCHEDULEEXPIRES DECEMBER 31, 2025 115% Above Hourly Rate
A Regular Workday is defined as the first 8 hours between 6am and 6pm, Monday through Friday.

Standard Overtime: Weekdays & Saturdays (first 8 hours)150% Above Hourly Rate Overtime: Saturdays (over 8 hours); Sunday (first 8 hours)200% Above Hourly Rate Overtime: Sundays (over 8 hours) and Holidays300% Above Hourly Rate Night Shift is defined as a shift starting after 2pm and before 4am Annual Rate IncreaseCrawford & Associates, Inc. anticipates an hourly rate increase 5% effective Jan 1st of each new year without prior notice. For projects that span multiple years, an updated rate schedule will be sent with the first invoice that reflects the annual increase.

CRAWFORD & ASSOCIATES - 2025 FEE SCHEDULEEXPIRES DECEMBER 31, 2025 Soils - CharacteristicsASTMAASHTO Caltrans RateSieve Analysis w/#200 Wash D6913T11/T88 CT202 220.00$ Sieve Analysis w/out #200 Wash D6913T88 CT202 165.00$ Sieve Analysis with HydrometerD6913/D7928T88 - 450.00$ #200 Wash Only D1140T11 202 125.00$ Hydrometer Analysis D7928T88 - 285.00$ Seive Analysis - Mass Grain Size (Scour)D6913T88 202 2,300.00$ Atterberg Limits Multipoint 4318T89 & T90 204 270.00$ Atterberg Limits Single Point D4318T89 & T90 204 225.00$ Liquid Limit Only D4318T89 204 200.00$ Plastic Limit Only D4318T90 204 140.00$ Expansion Index D4829 - - 285.00$ Moisture-Density D2216 85.00$ Soil Moisture Content D2216T265 CT226 35.00$ Organic Content D2974 135.00$ USDA Soil Textural Analysis 100.00$ Soils - Density4" Proctor D1557/D698 T180/T99 - 475.00$ 6" Proctor D1557/D698 T180/T99 - 535.00$ 4" Proctor -Check Point D1557/D698 T180/T99 - 130.00$ 6" Proctor - Check Point D1557/D698 T180/T99 - 130.00$ California Impact Test - - 216 365.00$ Soils - Strength Direct Shear - 3 Point Peak D3080T236 - 450.00$ Triaxial Shear, Unconsolidated, UndrainedD2850T296 - 180.00$ Triaxial Staged, Unconsolidated, Undrained D2850T296 - 300.00$ Triaxial Staged, Consolidated, Undrained D4767T297 - 550.00$ Triaxial Staged, Consolidated, Drained D7181 - - Ask for QuoteUnconfined Compression D2166T208 240.00$ Resistance Value (R-Value) SoilsD2844T190 301 400.00$ Resistance Value (R-Value) Treated Soil/Aggregate BaseD2844T190 301 500.00$ Soils - Consolidation 1-D Consolidation D2435T216 420.00$ 1-D Consolidation (Time Rate)/Per PointD2435T216 105.00$ Rock - Strength Point Load D5731 70.00$ Unconfined Compression D7012 240.00$ Environmental TestingpH, Resistivity, Sulfate, Choride Content Suite 417422643 250.00$ pH, Resistivity, Sulfate, Choride Content, Redox Potential SuiteG200M 417422643 365.00$ Landscape Sutability LTP.4 130.00$ Aggregates - HMA, Concrete Seive Analysis - Course and Fine C136 or D6913T27 202 220.00$ Seive Analysis - #200 Wash C117 T11 202 125.00$ Sieve Analysis - Coarse AggregateC136 or D6913T27 202 175.00$ Sieve Analysis- Fine AggregateC136 or D6913T27 202 165.00$ Specific Gravity - Coarse Aggregate C128 T85 206 350.00$ Specific Gravity - Fine Aggregate C127 T84 207 200.00$ Sand Equivalent - 3 Point D2419T176 217 165.00$ Sand Equivalent - 1 Point D2419T176 217 125.00$ Curshed Particals - Coarse Aggregate (One and two Face)D5821T335 205 245.00$ Flat and Elongatd Particles D4791 - 235 Ask for QuoteClay Lums and Friable Particale C142 T112 225.00$ Fine Aggregate Angularity C1252T304 234 220.00$ Organic Impurities C40 T210 213 150.00$ Abrasion Resistance LA RattlerC131/535T96 211 320.00$ Bulk Density Unit Wieght of Aggregate C29 T19 212 155.00$ Aggregate Moisture C566 T255 226 55.00$ Cleanness Value 227 250.00$ Durability Index D3744T210 229 390.00$ 2025 Laboratory Fees

CRAWFORD & ASSOCIATES - 2025 FEE SCHEDULEEXPIRES DECEMBER 31, 2025 Hot Mix Asphalt Asphalt Binder Content - Ignition OvenD6307T308 382 230.00$ Asphalt Binder Content - Ignition Oven CalibrationD6307T308 382 480.00$ HMA Moisture Content T329 226/370 80.00$ Maximum Specific Gravity (Rice)D2041T209 309 235.00$ Hveem Stabilty 1561/1560T247/246 304/366 485.00$ Asphalt Binder Content by Extraction MethodD2172T164 405.00$ Core Unit Weight - Field SpecimanD2726T166 308 65.00$ Hamburg Wheel Track T324 389 1,490.00$ Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR) 4867 T283 371 1,390.00$ Unit Wieght, Gyratory D6925T312 625.00$ VMA/VFA/Dust Proportion - MS2 185.00$ ConcreteConcrete Compressive Strength - 4x8 CylindersC39 T22 521 40.00$ Concrete Compressive Strength - 6x12 CylindersC39 T22 521 50.00$ Concrete Compressive Strength - Core C42 T24 95.00$ Concrete Stength - Flexural BeamC78/293T97/T177 523 125.00$ MasonryCMU Absorption/Unit Wt/MoistureC140 275.00$ Masonry Grout Compression 50.00$ Masonry Mortar Compression 40.00$ Composite Prism Compression 125.00$ Masonry Core Shear 275.00$ Structural Steel Reinforcing Steel - Tesile 100.00$ Reinforcing Steel - Bend 100.00$ Reinforcing Steel - Elongation (Up to #8) 90.00$ High Strength Bolt - Proof Load- Wedge Tension and Hardness Suite 300.00$ High Strength Nut - Proof Load and Hardness Suite 200.00$ High Strength Washer - Hardness 100.00$ Reinforcing 7 Wire Strand - Tensile 350.00$ Design Soil Stabilization Mix Design (Lime or Cement) D1633 373 2,100.00$ Full Depth Reclamation - Cement 373 2,500.00$ MiscellaneousSample Preparation by Hour 105.00$ Specimen cutting 85.00$ Sample Storage (Starting 90 days after final lab report) 150.00$ 2025 Laboratory Fees (Cont.)

ATTACHMENT 4

SIERRA LAND SURVEYING LETTER PROPOSAL

PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYING SERVICE AGREEMENT
Project Name: 42929 County Road 24
Project APN: 042-580-034
Project Location: Woodland, California
Date: July 21, 2025
Project Number: TBD
Client : Cyle Moon
Robertson-Bryan,Inc
Consultant: Sierra Land Surveying
5825 Forest Lake Rd
Diamond Springs, CA 95619
(530) 409-0900
Project Description: Client (Robertson-Bryan,Inc) retains Sierra Land Surveying to provide land surveying services outlined below.

Scope of Services: Sierra Land Surveying will provide the following services:
● Provide a topographic survey for the area shown in below image, approximately 40 acres ● Survey limits to extend to top of levee bank and include bathymetry plus above water measurements and water level elevation ● All measurements to be conducted with survey grade GNSS RTK equipment and single beam sonar, based on either a local control system or State Plane Coordinates, to be determined prior to field survey. ● Deliverable to be an autocad Civil3D .dwg with 1 foot contour interval, xml surface file, and PDF topographic survey sheet, signed and stamped by a California Professional Land Surveyor.

Fee Proposal: Sierra Land Surveying will perform the scope of services for a fixed fee of $6000.

There will be no additional fees charged to the project without the clients’ written permission.

ASSUMPTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS
Conditions: The following Terms and Conditions are incorporated into and made a part of this Professional Services Agreement.

Authorization: Subject to receipt of any specified retainer, the undersigned agree to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

CLIENT AND CONSULTANT AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

Client agrees to engage Consultant according to the terms of this agreement ("the Agreement").

1. Consultant agrees to perform the services set forth in the aforementioned “Scope of Services”.

2. Client agrees to compensate Consultant for its Services according to the aforementioned “Fee Proposal”.

GENERAL PROVISIONS
Client and Consultant agree that the following provisions shall be part of this Agreement:

1. Suspension or Termination of Agreement. Client and/ or Consultant shall have the right to suspend or terminate this Agreement at any time. If the client terminates the contract before the completion of services, the Consultant will be paid for their services based on a time and materials rate utilizing the rate schedule there in effect. Further, any such termination shall automatically release Consultant from any liability for all Services performed.

2. Liability Limits. Client agrees that Consultant's total liability to Client, its agents, employees, contractors, subcontractors, successors and assigns, for professional negligence, acts, errors or omissions of consultant, shall be limited to $25,000 or Consultant's fees, whichever is less.

3. No Warranties. Consultant makes no warranty, either express or implied, as to its findings, recommendations, or professional advice except that the service was performed pursuant to generally accepted standards of practice in effect at the time of performance.

4. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between Client and Consultant relating to the project and the provision of Services to the project. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations or representations not expressly set forth in this Agreement are of no force or effect. Subsequent modifications to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both Client and Consultant.

5. Acceptance and Commencement. By execution of this Agreement Client accepts the terms hereof, acknowledges receipt of a copy hereof, including all exhibits, and authorizes Consultant to proceed with the Services. In the event Client is not the owner of the Property, Client represents that Client has obtained permission from said owner for Consultant to proceed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this Agreement upon the terms and conditions stated above and on the date first above written.

CONSULTANT CLIENT
Sierra Land Surveying
Sign: Sign:

Date: 7/21/2025 Date:

Matt Vander Dussen, PLS 9355 Print Name:

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

APPROVING A CONSULTANT AGREMENT FOR THE WPCF EMERGENCY
DETENTION BASIN ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS CIP 26-11.

WHEREAS, the WPCF is regulated under a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit (NPDES); and

WHEREAS, the NPDES permit requires an analysis of Erskine Pond at the WPCF and ultimately requires construction of an emergency detention basin; and

WHEREAS, Robertson - Bryan, Inc. (RBI) is experienced in this type of work; and

WHEREAS, the funding for the work is budgeted in the WPCF Asset Replacement Project, CIP 14-02; and

WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to reallocate $300,000 in funds from the WPCF Asset Replacement Project, CIP 14-02 to the Water Pollution Asset Replacement (WPCF) Emergency Detention Basin Alternatives Analysis Project, CIP 26-11; and

WHEREAS, the City of Woodland wishes to enter into a Consultant Agreement with RBI to complete the Alternatives Analysis for an amount of $262,867; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves the reallocation of $300,000 of Sewer Enterprise Funds from the WPCF Asset Replacement Project, CIP 14-02, to the Water Pollution Asset Replacement (WPCF) Emergency Detention Basin Alternatives Analysis Project, CIP 26- 11 for a total budget of $300,000.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves the Agreement. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Agreement with RBI in the amount of $262,867, subject to City Attorney approval. The City Attorney is hereby authorized to make clarifying changes so long as the total dollar amount authorized in the Agreement does not change.

SECTION 3. A copy of the Agreement is available and on file in the City Clerk’s office and is incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 7th day of April 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ________________________________ Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.8
SUBJECT: Woodland Avenue Alley Abandonment

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. ________, approving a Summary Vacation of the alley within the property lines of 414 Woodland Avenue and authorize the City Manager to execute a quit claim deed for excess right of way.

Staff Contact:

Lolly Weichel, Senior Engineering Assistant, (530) 661-5950, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The proposed summary vacation of this alley right of way will have no negative fiscal impact on the City. Conversely, the vacation eliminates future City obligations to maintain or improve this surplus easement as a public alley.

Background:

Beamers Addition Subdivision, recorded in 1887, created a public alley in the form of an easement, running from Woodland Avenue to Plane Avenue parallel to and west of College Street. A portion of the alley located within the boundaries of 414 Woodland Avenue was never constructed as or used as an alley.

The property owners, Jon and Jessica Klosinski, have requested the abandonment of the northern 300 feet of surplus alley (20 feet wide, totaling 0.138 acres) that currently bisects the property at 414 Woodland Avenue. The southernmost portion of the alleyway will continue to serve as a city alley right of way until such time that adjacent property owners wish to abandon these portions as well.

The property owner's intent in the alley abandonment request is to un-encumber the property for future development to allow for full legal rights to property use. A legal description and map of the proposed abandonment area are attached as Exhibits A and B.

As required by California Government Code Section 65402, the Planning Commission made a finding on February 19, 2026, that the proposed abandonment is in conformity with the City's General Plan.

Discussion:

Once the proposed abandonment is found in conformity with the City's General Plan, the excess right of way may be summarily vacated per the California Streets and Highways Code (§ 8331) if:

1. The street or highway has been impassable for vehicular travel for five consecutive years; and

2. No public funds were expended for maintenance during that period.

The subject area meets these criteria as it is currently non-traffic bearing and is surplus to the City's transportation needs.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. ________, approving a Summary Vacation of the alley within the property lines of 414 Woodland Avenue and authorize the City

Manager to execute a quit claim deed for excess right of way.

Prepared by: Lolly Weichel, Senior Engineering Assistant Reviewed by: Ed Wisniewski, Senior Civil Engineer

Attachments:

1. Exhibit A - Legal Description

2. Exhibit B - Plat Map

3. Aerial Exhibit

4. Proposed Resolution_Summary Vacation 414 Woodland

4949
September 29, 2025

EXHIBIT “A”
20-FOOT ALLEY ABANDONMENT

THAT portion of real property situate in the County of Yolo, State of California, and being a portion of Section 29, Township 10 North, Range 2 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, also being a portion of the alley within Block 2, of “BEAMERS ADDITIONS” recorded in Book 42 of Deeds at Page 563, said Couty Records, and being more particularly described as follows:

BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of Lot 11 of said Block 2; thence, from said POINT OF BEGINNING, and along the North line of said Lot 11, North 89°52ʹ22ʺ East 20.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 10 of said Block 2; thence leaving said North line and along East line of said Alley, South 00°00ʹ30ʺ West 300.00 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 6 of said Block 2; thence South 89°52ʹ22ʺ West 20.00 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot 15 of said Block 2; thence along the West line of said Alley, North 00°00ʹ30ʺ East 300.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 0.138 acres of land, more or less.

The basis of bearings for this description is North 89°52’22” East, shown hereon as the centerline of Woodland Avenue, as shown in said Book 8 of Parcel Maps at Page 93, said County Records.

End of description.

___________________________ ____________
Matthew K. Souza, L.S. Date

414 Woodland
Avenue
Legend
COWGIS
Address Points
Parcels
Aerial Imagery with Labels - 2025
Red: Red
Green: Green
Blue: Blue
Notes
Alley Vacation
0 150 300 ft
Unused public alley to be
vacated to adjacent property
owner (414 Woodland Ave).

RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

CITY OF WOODLAND

No fee document per
Government Code 27383

WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City Clerk
City of Woodland
300 First Street
Woodland, CA 95695

This space above for Recorder’s Use Only

RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

WOODLAND SUMMARILY VACATING AN UNUSED PORTION OF

ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT OFF WOODLAND AVENUE
PURSUANT TO STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 8330 ET
SEQ., AND FINDING THAT ADEQUATE CONSIDERATION EXISTS FOR

THE TRANSFER OF THE PROPERTY, ONCE VACATED, TO THE

LANDOWNER OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY

WHEREAS, the City of Woodland (“City”) holds title to that certain unused 300-foot portion of 20-foot wide public alley located south of Woodland Avenue and approximately 187.5 feet west of and parallel to College Street (described in Exhibit A and shown in Exhibit B) (referred to herein as the “ROW”), located in the City, which lies between those properties commonly known as APNs 005-594-003 and 005-595-001; and

WHEREAS, the City has title to the ROW in the form of an easement pursuant to that certain Beamer’s Addition Subdivision, as recorded on December 10, 1887, in Deed Book 42 Page 563 in the Official Records of the County of Yolo, State of California; and

WHEREAS, the ROW easement was dedicated for use as a public alley which the City of Woodland has determined is not needed for this area, and there are no current or planned public improvements for this excess right-of-way; and

WHEREAS, the ROW has not been improved as a public alley or maintained by the City of Woodland in the known history of the property; and

WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Woodland that once the ROW is vacated, all of the City’s right, title and interest in the Street ROW will be transferred to the adjacent owner; and

WHEREAS, the summary vacation proceedings are to be conducted pursuant to the provisions in § 8330 – 8336, Chapter 4 of Part 3, Division 9, entitled “Summary Vacation,” of the State of California Streets & Highways Code; and

WHEREAS, Section 8331 of the California Streets and Highways Code provide that the City Council of the City of Woodland may summarily vacate an excess right-of-way of a street or highway that is impassable for vehicular travel and no public money was expended for maintenance on the street or highway for at least the past consecutive five years immediately preceding this vacation; and

WHEREAS, application has been made to the City on behalf of the owner of the adjacent properties for summary vacation of the ROW and the owner has paid the applicable fees for processing the ROW vacation; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 65402(a), the Planning Commission of the City of Woodland reviewed the proposed vacation of ROW and Easements at its regularly scheduled meeting on February 19, 2026, and found that vacation of the ROW located south of Woodland Avenue and parallel to College Street conforms with the City’s General Plan; and

WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 8336, the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution, attested by the Clerk under seal, to be recorded without acknowledgement, certificate of acknowledgement, or further proof in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Yolo, and no fee shall be charged for this recordation.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1. Order of Vacation. The City Council, under the authority vested in it by the California Streets and Highways Code, Division 9 - Change of Grade and Vacation, Part 3 - Public Streets, Highways, and Service Easements Vacation Law (Sections 8300 et seq.), Chapter 4 - Summary Vacation (Streets & Highways Code sections 8330 et seq.), hereby orders the vacation of the ROW and any and all interests that the City may have therein, as more particularly described and depicted in the attached Exhibits A and B. From and after the date this Resolution is recorded, the portion of the road described in Exhibit A and shown in Exhibit B shall no longer constitute a public alley.

SECTION 2. Authority for Vacation. The summary vacation of the ROW is made based on the fact that, pursuant to Streets and Highway Code section 8331, this is a street or highway that has been impassable for vehicular travel for a period of at least five consecutive years and no public money was expended for maintenance on the street or highway during such period.

SECTION 3. General Plan Conformity. The vacation of ROW has been found by the Planning Commission of the City of Woodland to be in conformity with the City of Woodland General Plan.

SECTION 4. Additional Finding; Authorization to Transfer the Street. The City Council additionally finds that, in consideration for the findings set forth in this Resolution, adequate consideration exists for the ROW to be transferred to the adjacent owner. The City Council, as permitted by California Streets & Highways Code section 8355, hereby authorizes the City Manager, once the ROW is vacated, to transfer any and all of the City’s interest in the ROW, whether by quitclaim deed, termination of easement, or any other document(s), to the adjacent property owner, and to execute any and all documents required for such transfer and to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution.

SECTION 5. CEQA Finding. This action is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Title 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15305 as a minor alteration in land use limitations.

SECTION 6. Certification, Recordation, and Retention. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 8336, the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution, attested by the Clerk under seal, to be recorded without acknowledgement, certificate of acknowledgement, or further proof in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Yolo, and pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 8336, no fee shall be charged for this recordation. The City Clerk shall permanently maintain a true and correct copy of this Resolution in the City Clerk’s Office.

SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption.

Upon the recordation required hereby, the vacation is complete, and from and after the date this Resolution is recorded, the street, highway, or public service easement vacated no longer constitutes a street, highway, or public service easement.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 7th day of April 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.9
SUBJECT: Approval of an Employment Agreement for a Retired Annuitant and Exception to the CalPERS 180-Day
Wait Period

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving an employment agreement and exception to the CalPERS 180-Day wait period for retired annuitant Omar Flores.

Staff Contact:

Richard Towle, Professional Standards/Administration Sergeant, (530)661-7884, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The costs associated with hiring a retired annuitant are accounted for in the Fiscal Year 2026 budget, and no additional funds will be allocated.

Discussion:

After 23 years of service with the City, Police Officer Omar Flores retired effective January 14th, 2026. Officer Flores has worked in several assignments within the Police Department (PD), most recently as a College Resource Officer (CRO), assigned to the Woodland Community College, for the PD. During Officer Flores career, he has worked several other assignments, including Patrol, School Resource Officer (SRO), Gang Investigator, GREAT Instructor, CNT negotiator, and Arrest and Control Instructor.

Currently, we have one School Resource Officer who is out on catastrophic leave due to an injury.

The probability of her return is unknown at this time. We are building a Special Operations Unit, which will have a gang enforcement function. Officer Flores’s knowledge and expertise will greatly enhance our capabilities in both areas. The City is requesting that Officer Flores return to work as a retired annuitant so that the City can seamlessly continue providing quality service in Patrol, SRO, and gang investigations or until Flores’s replacement is selected.

The California Public Employee Retirement System (CalPERS) has specific rules that public agencies must follow when allowing employees who have retired to return to work. Typically, once an employee retires from an agency, they are required to wait 180 days before they can return to work.

However, there are rules (Gov. Code 7522.56 & 21224) that allow a contracting public agency to request a waiver of its 180-day waiting period for retired annuitants to perform work of limited duration, such as elimination of a backlog, special project work, or to perform work exceeding regular staff work.

This report seeks Council action on a resolution, as required by CalPERS, to allow the City to employ Omar Flores as a retired annuitant for this specific purpose. Upon his return to work, he will provide assistance at the level of a Police Officer to support the School Resource Officer Unit and the Special Operations Unit. The agreement with Omar Flores will automatically terminate on April 19th, 2027 or when the SRO unit is at full capacity and the SOU is fully functional with gang enforcement and investigation, whichever is sooner.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving an employment agreement and exception to the CalPERS 180-Day wait period for retired annuitant Omar Flores.

Prepared by: Richard Towle, Professional Standards/Administration Sergeant

Reviewed by: Ryan L. Kinnan, Chief of Police

Attachments:

1. Omar Flores Temp Employment Agreement

2. Proposed Resolution - Omar Flores Retired Annuitant

1 AGREEMENT FOR TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is between the CITY OF WOODLAND, State of California, a municipal corporation (“City”), and Omar Flores, an individual (“Employee”) (collectively, the “Parties”) and is effective at 12:00 a.m. on April 19, 2026.

Recitals
WHEREAS, as of 12:00am on April 19, 2026, the City will have a need for assistance in the City of Woodland Police Department. The City needs assistance at the level of a Police Officer to support the School Resource Officer (SRO) unit, and the Special Operations Unit (SOU) as the City fills positions for full time Police Officers and trains newly appointed SOU members.

Employee must assist with SRO duties at the schools for which the City of Woodland has agreed to provide police services. Employee will assist with gang enforcement/investigations as needed.

Employee will continue to provide assistance until the SRO unit is fully staffed and trained, and the SOU team reaches full operational capacity in the areas of gang enforcement and investigations.

WHEREAS, the City has an immediate need for an employee to provide temporary assistance as the subject matter expert in gang enforcement/investigations, and SRO duties. The City anticipates that this may take up to one (1) year, during this time Officer Flores can continue to work as an SRO and assist the SOU unit with gang enforcement/investigations as needed. Omar Flores will continue to provide his assistance until the SRO unit has full duty Officers providing staffing, and the SOU team reaches full operational capacity in the areas of gang enforcement and investigations; and
WHEREAS, Employee is competent and qualified to perform the services required by this Agreement, and City wishes to have Employee perform the Police Officer duties on an interim basis as it relates to the appropriate open cases; and
WHEREAS, Employee’s employment is authorized by Government Code section 21224, which permits the City to appoint a CalPERS retired annuitant to perform work of a limited duration, work exceeding regular staff work, and duties requiring specialized skills, such as a subject matter expert as the City continues to bring closure to open cases, or transition those cases to another employee:

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do mutually agree as follows:

Agreement

1. Appointment and Scope of Services: Pursuant to this Agreement, Employee is appointed as a Police Officer, and shall temporarily perform the functions of this position, which is a position involving highly specialized and critically needed skills set forth in the attached job description, in the Woodland Municipal Code and as provided by law. Such employment is “at will,” subject to the terms of this Agreement, and Employee shall perform said duties at the pleasure of and under the direct supervision of the Police Chief.

2. Compensation and Work Schedule:

2 Rate of Pay: Employee shall be paid at the rate of $56.66 per hour. The City has confirmed that this rate is not less than the minimum, nor in excess of the maximum monthly salary paid by the City to other employees performing comparable duties (divided by 173.333 to equal an hourly rate) as listed on the City’s publicly available pay schedule and publicly available employment agreements. Payments will be made on regularly scheduled City payroll dates and shall be subject to all applicable payroll taxes and withholdings. Such compensation shall be the sole compensation for the Employee’s services under this Agreement.

Work Schedule and 960-hour Limitation: Employee is expected to devote the necessary time, both within and outside normal business hours, to the business of the City. Pursuant to Government Code section 21224 and section 7522.56(d), however, Employee is allowed to work a maximum of 960 hours per fiscal year for all public employers that contract with CalPERS for retirement benefits. The City retains the right to designate, reduce, change, or amend the number of hours assigned to the Employee consistent with the City’s workload and other needs. If the employee’s annual hours approach 960, the City reserves the right to summarily suspend the employee’s duties under this Agreement and to reassign any scheduled hours, as needed, to ensure the employee does not exceed the maximum hours allowed under this Agreement. The employee will be responsible for keeping track of the number of hours worked on a daily time sheet form provided by the City and for submitting it at least once every two weeks.

The position is a temporary, hourly assignment which is generally not expected to exceed 40 hours per week. The City, through the Police Chief, will assign Employee hours to work. Due to the nature of the position, it is understood that the workday and work week hours may vary, however Employee shall not work overtime (i.e. in excess of 40 hours per week) without express permission from the Police Chief.

3. Employment Status:

A. Benefits: Other than the compensation described above in Section 2, Employee will receive no other benefits, incentives, compensation in lieu of benefits, or any other form of compensation. Employee understands and agrees that he is not, and will not be, eligible to receive any benefits from the City, including any City group plan for hospital, surgical, or medical insurance, any City retirement program, or any paid holidays, vacation, sick leave, or other leave, with or without pay, or any other job benefits available to an employee in the regular service of the City, except for Worker’s Compensation Insurance coverage or similar benefits required by law.

B. No Membership in Bargaining Unit: Employee understands that he is not a member of any bargaining unit and is not covered by the terms of any Memorandum of Understanding with any represented or unrepresented group of City employees.

C. No Property Right in Employment: Employee understands and agrees that the terms of her employment are governed only by this Agreement and that no right of regular employment for any specific term is created by this Agreement. Employee further understands that he acquires no property interest in her employment by virtue of this agreement, that the employment is “at will” as defined by the laws of the State of California (meaning that he can be terminated at any time for any reason or for no reason), and that

3 he is not entitled to any pre- or post-deprivation administrative hearing or other due process upon termination or any disciplinary action except as otherwise provided by law.

D. Employment of a Retiree: Employee understands that CalPERS retired annuitants may be employed by a CalPERS public agency employer, by temporary appointment to a position not to exceed 960 hours in any fiscal year for all such employers; either (1) during an emergency to prevent stoppage of public business or (2) because the retired employee has skills needed in performing the work of limited duration. As of the time of entering this Agreement, Employee represents that he is not performing services for any other CalPERS public agency employer. In the event Employee begins providing service to any other CalPERS public agency employer during the term of this Agreement, Employee must immediately notify the City of accepting such employment and disclose on a periodic basis (at a frequency determined by the City) the number of hours Employee is performing for that other public agency to ensure that the maximum number of hours is not exceeded.

4. Representation of Employee: Employee represents that he is properly trained and certified to perform the duties required of the position and this Agreement.

5. Effective Date and Term of Agreement: This Agreement shall be effective on April 19, 2026 (“Effective Date”), and unless terminated earlier, shall terminate automatically at midnight on April 19, 2027, or when the SRO unit is full capacity and the SOU unit is fully functional with gang enforcement/investigation, whichever is sooner.

Employment is temporary, at-will and may be terminated with or without cause and with or without notice at any time by the Employee or the City. Employee is not eligible for any severance payment or benefit relating to or arising out of the termination of this Agreement.

6. Non-Assignment of Agreement: This Agreement is intended to secure the individual services of the Employee and is not assignable or transferable by employee to any third party.

7. Governing Law/Venue: This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action or proceeding regarding this contract shall be in Yolo County.

8. Enforceability: If any term, covenant, condition, or provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby.

9. Conflict of Interest: Employee agrees that during the term of this Agreement, he will not maintain any financial interest or engage in any other contract employment, occupation, work, endeavor or association, whether compensated or not, that would in any way conflict with or impair Employee’s ability to perform the duties described in this Agreement. Any work performed for the City outside the terms of this Agreement must be approved in advance in writing by the Police Chief. Employee agrees to disclose whether he is performing work for any other CalPERS public agency employer as required by section

3.D. of this Agreement.

4 10. Entire Agreement and Modification: This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the parties hereto. This Agreement supersedes any previous contracts, agreements, negotiations or understandings, whether written or oral, between the parties.

Employee shall be entitled to no other compensation or benefits than those specified herein, and Employee acknowledges that no representation, inducements or promises not contained in this Agreement have been made to Employee to induce Employee to enter into this Agreement.

No changes, amendments, or alterations hereto shall be effective unless in writing and signed by both parties. Employee understands that no oral modification of this Agreement made by any officer, agent, or employee of the City is effective. Employee specifically acknowledges that in entering and executing this Agreement, he relies solely upon the provisions contained herein and no others.

11. Support Services and Equipment: Employee shall be provided office space and the equipment needed to perform her duties and sufficient to fulfill obligations under this Agreement, as determined by the Police Chief, at no cost to employee. Such equipment shall include a City-owned computer, typical office equipment. In accordance with Government Code Section 21224, personal use of such equipment is not permitted.

12. Reimbursement for Expenses: Employee shall be reimbursed by City in accordance with standard City travel policy (as well as federal and state law) for all authorized and necessary travel undertaken by Employee in performance of services pursuant to this Agreement.

Employee shall document and claim said reimbursement for such travel in the manner and forms required by the City. Other than as specifically provided herein, Employee shall receive no other compensation or reimbursements for expenses incurred by him in performance of this Agreement.

13. Notices: All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties by hand-delivery or by mail at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose, by deposit in the U.S. Mail, postage pre-paid, addressed as follows:

CITY: City of Woodland
300 First Street
Woodland, CA 95695
Attn: Police Chief
EMPLOYEE: Omar Flores
On file with the City

14. Indemnification: In accordance with and subject to the limitations of the California Government Claims Act and California Labor Code, the City shall defend, save harmless and indemnify Employee against any tort, professional liability, claim or demand or other legal action, arising out of an alleged act or omission occurring in the performance of Employee’s services as Police Officer, except that this provision shall not apply with respect to any intentional tort or crime committee by Employee, or any actions outside the course and scope of her employment as Police Officer.

5 15. No Presumption of Drafter: The Parties acknowledge and agree that the terms and provisions of this Agreement have been negotiated and discussed between the Parties, and this Agreement reflects their mutual agreement regarding the subject matter of this Agreement. Because of the nature of such negotiations and discussions, it would be inappropriate to deem any Party to be the drafter of this Agreement and, therefore, no presumption for or against validity or as to any interpretation hereof, based upon the identity of the drafter shall be applicable in interpreting or enforcing this Agreement.

16. Assistance of Counsel: Each party to this Agreement warrants to the other party that the party has either had the assistance of counsel in negotiation for, and preparation of, this Agreement or could have had such assistance and voluntarily declined to obtain such assistance.

Dated:

EMPLOYEE:

OMAR FLORES

Dated:

CITY:

RYAN L. KINNAN

POLICE CHIEF

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

APPROVING THE HIRING OF OMAR FLORES AS A RETIRED ANNUITANT UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE 7522.56 & 21224

WHEREAS, in compliance with Government (Gov.) Code section 7522.56 & 21224 of the Public Employees’ Retirement Law, the City of Woodland must provide CalPERS this certification resolution when hiring a retiree before 180 days have passed since their retirement date; and

WHEREAS, Omar Flores, CalPERS 7373459996 retired from the City of Woodland in the position of Police Officer, effective January 14, 2026; and

WHEREAS, Gov. Code section 7522.56 requires that post-retirement employment commence no earlier than 180 days after the retirement date, which is July 13, 2026, without this certification resolution; and

WHEREAS, Gov. Code section 7522.56 provides that this exception to the 180-day wait period shall not apply if the retiree accepts any retirement-related incentive; and

WHEREAS, the City Council of Woodland, the City of Woodland, Police Department, and Omar Flores certify that Officer Omar Flores has not and will not receive a Golden Handshake or any other retirement-related incentive; and

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Woodland hereby appoints Omar Flores as an extra help retired annuitant to perform the duties of the Police Officer for the City of Woodland under Gov. Code section 21224, effective April 19, 2026; and

WHEREAS, the entire employment agreement, contract, or appointment document between Omar Flores and the City of Woodland has been reviewed by this body and is attached herein; and

WHEREAS, no matters, issues, terms, or conditions related to this employment and appointment; and

WHEREAS, the employment shall be limited to 960 hours per fiscal year for all CalPERS employers; and

WHEREAS, the compensation paid to retirees cannot be less than the minimum nor exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties, divided by 173.333 to equal the hourly rate; and

WHEREAS, the maximum base salary for this position is $9,820.30 and the hourly equivalent is $56.66, and the minimum base salary for this position is $7,328.06 and the hourly equivalent is $42.28; and

WHEREAS, the hourly rate paid to Omar Flores will be $56.66; and

WHEREAS, Omar Flores has not and will not receive any other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefit, or other form of compensation in addition to this hourly pay rate.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1. The City hereby certifies the nature of the employment of Omar Flores as described herein and detailed in the attached employment agreement document.

SECTION 2. This appointment is necessary to fill the critically needed position of Police Officer for the City of Woodland by April 19, 2026, because Omar Flores is needed to backfill the School Resource Officer (SRO) position, assist with SRO gang enforcement and investigations until the units are staffed with full duty Police Officers and reach full operational capacity.

SECTION 3. The City anticipates this may take up to one (1) year; during this time, Officer Omar Flores can continue working on closing the cases and transitioning other cases to the new Police Officer.

SECTION 4. The City approves the hire of Omar Flores as a retired annuitant under Government Code 21224.

SECTION 5. The City Manager, on behalf of the City of Woodland, is hereby authorized to take any and all actions necessary to implement the foregoing resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on this 7th day of April 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ________________________________ Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.10
SUBJECT: Approval of Memorandum of Understanding
Regarding Fire Services and Authorization to
Execute Agreement for Provision of Fire Protection
Services in the Elkhorn Fire Protection District Area

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. , approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Woodland, Springlake Fire Protection District, County of Yolo, and the City of West Sacramento regarding the provision of fire protection services associated with the reorganization of the Elkhorn Fire Protection District; and authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to make minor edits, as necessary, and to execute the MOU and all related agreements, including the Agreement for the Provision of Fire Protection Services in the Elkhorn Fire Protection District service area.

Staff Contact:

Eric Zane, Fire Chief, (530) 661-5860, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The action would result in a net positive impact to the General Fund. Under the proposed Agreement, the County would compensate the City $293,129 to cover the costs to provide the specified fire services. The agreement stipulates that this amount would be adjusted annually by CPI for the term of the contract. Additionally, the County will cover training and other one-time start-up costs incurred by the City up to $150,000.

Background:

The Yolo Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) is currently considering a reorganization of the Elkhorn Fire Protection District, which may include dissolution and annexation of its territory into the Springlake Fire Protection District, or other structural changes as determined by LAFCo.

To ensure continuity of fire protection and emergency response services following any approved reorganization, the involved agencies—including the City of Woodland—have developed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that establishes a framework for service delivery and interagency coordination.

The MOU outlines the intent of the parties to enter into binding service agreements upon the effective date of the LAFCo reorganization, ensuring that residents and properties within the Elkhorn service area continue to receive fire protection services without interruption.

Under the associated agreement, the City of Woodland would provide fire protection and emergency response services—including fire suppression, emergency medical response, hazardous materials response, and technical rescue—to the northern portion of the Elkhorn Fire Protection District territory following reorganization.

At its March 24th meeting, the Yolo County Board of Supervisors approved the MOU and associated agreement. The Board's action provided authority to the County Administrative Officer and County Counsel to make edits and take actions necessary to execute the agreement.

Discussion:

The proposed MOU and accompanying service agreement formalize existing operational relationships and mutual aid practices between Woodland and neighboring jurisdictions. Woodland Fire Department has historically provided automatic and mutual aid response into portions of the Elkhorn area and currently provides contracted services in adjacent areas within Springlake Fire Protection District.

The agreement ensures:

Continuity of service for residents and businesses in the Elkhorn area following LAFCo action.

Clearly defined service responsibilities between partner agencies.

Sustainable funding mechanisms, including allocation of property tax revenues, assessments, and an additional annual contribution to support service delivery.

Regional coordination between Woodland, Springlake FPD, Yolo County, and West Sacramento.

The agreement term is five years, with automatic annual extensions unless terminated with appropriate notice, providing both stability and flexibility for future governance decisions.

This action positions the City to continue its role as a regional provider of fire protection services while supporting broader efforts to improve governance, efficiency, and service delivery across Yolo County fire agencies.

Staff's recommendation is to approve the MOU and associated Fire Protections Services Agreement and delegate authority to the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, to make final edits and take necessary actions to execute the agreements.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. , approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Woodland, Springlake Fire Protection District, County of Yolo, and the City of West Sacramento regarding the provision of fire protection services associated with the reorganization of the Elkhorn Fire Protection District; and authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to make minor edits, as necessary, and to execute the MOU and all related agreements, including the Agreement for the Provision of Fire Protection Services in the Elkhorn Fire Protection District service area.

Prepared by: Eric Zane, Fire Chief

Attachments:

1. FIRE_MOU_

2. Woodland_Agreement_

3. Service Area Map

4. Proposed Resolution - Elkhorn 2026

1 AGREEMENT NO. __-___
(Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Fire Services)
This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is made and entered into this ____ day of ______________, 2026, by and between the Springlake Fire Protection District (“Springlake FPD”), County of Yolo (“County”), the City of West Sacramento (“West Sacramento”), and the City of Woodland (“Woodland”) (collectively, “Parties”).

WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Yolo Local Agency Formation Commission (“LAFCo”) has initiated proceedings to reorganize Elkhorn Fire Protection District (“FPD”), which may involve the dissolution of Elkhorn FPD and the annexation into Springlake FPD of parts or all of Elkhorn FPD’s territory, or other reorganization of Elkhorn and Springlake FPDs, as will be determined by LAFCo (“LAFCo Reorganization”); and
WHEREAS, West Sacramento provides fire protection, emergency response, and other services outside of the city boundaries in the territory of County Service Area No. 9 (“CSA 9”) pursuant to an existing contract with the County; and
WHEREAS, Woodland provides fire protection, emergency response, and other services outside of the city boundaries in northern territory of Springlake FPD pursuant to an existing contract with the Springlake FPD; and
WHEREAS, West Sacramento and Woodland provide mutual aid service in the territory of the Elkhorn FPD; and
WHEREAS, the Parties intend to enter into the agreements contained in Exhibits A and B (“Agreements”) that ensure the citizens and properties within the current territory of Elkhorn FPD receive services following any LAFCo Reorganization.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

A. Woodland, Springlake FPD, and County agree to execute and be bound by the agreement contained in Exhibit A upon the effective date of the LAFCo Reorganization.

B. West Sacramento, Springlake FPD, and County agree to execute and be bound by the agreement contained in Exhibit B upon the effective date of the LAFCo Reorganization.

C. This MOU shall terminate, and the Parties commitment to be bound by the Agreements shall extinguish, if the LAFCo Reorganization is not completed by December 31, 2026, unless extended by agreement of the Parties.

2 D. In the event the reorganization approved by LAFCo differs than what is described in the Agreements, the Parties shall meet and confer to adapt the Agreements as necessary prior to the effective date of the LAFCo Reorganization.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above.

SPRINGLAKE FPD
By____________________________
Sheila A. Allen, Chair
Board of Directors
Attest:

Julie Dachtler, Senior Deputy Clerk
By_______________________________
(Seal)
Approved as to Form:
_________________________________
Philip Pogledich, County Counsel

COUNTY OF YOLO
By____________________________
Sheila A. Allen, Chair
Board of Supervisors
Attest:

Julie Dachtler, Senior Deputy Clerk
Board of Supervisors
By_______________________________
(Seal)
Approved as to Form:
_________________________________
Philip Pogledich, County Counsel

CITY OF WOODLAND
[insert signature block]

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
[insert signature block]

1 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SPRINGLAKE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, THE

COUNTY OF YOLO, AND THE CITY OF WOODLAND FOR THE PROVISION OF

FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES
This Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into this ____ day of ______, 2026 between the Springlake Fire Protection District (“Springlake FPD”), the County of Yolo (“County”), and the City of Woodland (“City”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Yolo Local Agency Formation Commission (“LAFCo”) has initiated proceedings to reorganize Elkhorn Fire Protection District (“FPD”), which may involve the dissolution of Elkhorn FPD annexed and the annexation of Elkhorn FPD’s territory into Springlake FPD, or other reorganization of Elkhorn FPD and Springlake FPD as will be determined by LAFCo; and
WHEREAS, City provides fire protection, emergency response, and other services outside of the city boundaries in northern territory of Springlake FPD pursuant to an existing agreement with the Springlake FPD; and
WHEREAS, City currently provides mutual aid in the territory of the Elkhorn FPD; and WHEREAS, City has agreed to provide services in the northern portion of Elkhorn FPD’s territory following any reorganization pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Definitions
a. “Effective Date” shall mean the effective date of the annexation of the Service Area into Springlake FPD.
b. “Services” shall mean all fire protection services, fire suppression services, emergency medical first responder services, hazardous material first responder services, technical rescue (excluding water rescue), and fire investigation (cause and origin only), as required by applicable laws and of the same quality as reasonably possible given geographic and land use differences as the services provided to property owners within City. “Services” shall not include the following:
i. Incident responsibility for complex incidents (i.e. more than four hours, or complex incident, such as a plane crash, levee break, large explosion, or complex hazmat incident);
ii. Administrative support to the District, except as reasonably necessary to provide the Services under this Agreement;

2 iii. Community risk reduction activities, such as plan review, fire and life safety inspections, code enforcement, and public education; iv. Emergency management;
v. Non-emergency call response (e.g. disabled vessel, vehicle/occupancy lockout, chirping smoke detector);
vi. Incident cost recovery (except for DUI cost recovery). c. “Service Area” shall mean the area described in Exhibit A. d. “Davis-Woodland Contract” shall mean the “Agreement Between the Springlake Fire Protection Distritct and the Cities of Davis and Woodland for the Provision of Fire Protection Services” dated June 30, 2024.

2. Services To Be Provided by Woodland
a. Commencing on the Effective Date, City shall, through its Fire Department, provide all Services in the Service Area.
b. In providing the Services required under this Agreement, City shall not be required to duplicate those efforts or services provided by other governmental agencies or to provide any services which are required by law to be provided by another governmental agency.

3. Compensation
a. For the Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, Springlake FPD shall pay City the following:
a. The portion of real property taxes that Springlake FPD annually receives for real property in the Service Area following the Effective Date;
b. Existing fire suppression assessments that Springlake annually receives from real property located in the Service Area following the Effective Date.
b. Payment of the property taxes and existing fire suppression assessments shall be made at the same time as property taxes and/or fire suppression assessments are paid to other fire protection districts in Yolo County which is generally in December, April, and August.
c. In addition to the compensation provided in subsection (b), above, City shall be paid $212,576 per fiscal year commencing July 1, 2026 (“Additional

3 Contribution”). The Additional Contribution may be made, in the discretion of the Springlake FPD Board, from any accrued reserves of the Elkhorn FPD that are transferred to Springlake FPD, proceeds from the sale of any Elkhorn FPD assets remaining after the payments described in Section 4(c), or any new assessments or fees collected in the Elkhorn area. Any remaining Additional Contribution shall be paid by County. The first Additional Contribution shall be due within 30 days of the Effective Date. The Additional Contribution for each successive year shall be paid by July 31. For the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2027 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Compensations shall be adjusted for inflation based on the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U): San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor for the preceding calendar year. For the purpose of calculating Compensation adjustments for future years, the initial annual service cost of $293,129 shall be adjusted by CPI and the Additional Contribution calculated net of property taxes and assessment.

4. County Administration of Springlake FPD; Other Collaboration. a. County shall assume City’s responsibility for the administrative services provided to Springlake FPD under the Davis-Woodland Contract. City shall be allowed to retain the $12,000/year compensation due to City for the administrative services as provided in the Davis-Woodland Contract. City’s retention of such compensation shall reduce County’s share of the Additional Contribution by an equivalent amount.
b. As of the execution of this Agreement, the parties expect to provide space for City’s fire and law enforcement agencies on a County-owned radio tower located at the Yolo Central Landfill. Unless continued evaluation demonstrates that providing space is infeasible, the parties will work in a collaborative and timely manner to complete a separate agreement addressing this matter. c. Springlake FPD shall use reasonable means to liquidate the assets transferred from Elkhorn FPD to Springlake FPD. A minimum of $100,000 and up to $150,000 of the proceeds of such sale shall be set aside for training and other one- time start-up costs associated with City’s provision of Services, as mutually agreed to between Springlake FPD and City. The City shall provide a list of necessary training and equipment and shall make a reasonable substantiation that such training and equipment has an appropriate nexus to the services provided in the Service Area.

5. Fees for Service
a. City shall utilize its schedule of fees to charge for operational/life safety permits and/or inspections, associated with businesses located within Springlake FPD. These fees will be charged to the business by City directly.

4 b. The Springlake Board shall vote to approve any increase in fees brought forth by City.

6. Term
a. The term of this Agreement shall begin on July 1, 2026 and shall, unless otherwise terminated in accordance with its terms, expire on midnight, June 30, 2031.
b. After expiration of the term, the Agreement shall continue on a year-to-year basis upon the same terms provided herein.
c. Any party to this Agreement may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon the provision of at least one year’s advance written notice to the other parties.
d. Springlake FPD and/or County’s failure to pay compensation due under this Agreement within 60 days of the due date shall be grounds for early termination of this Agreement. In the event of non-payment, City shall make a demand for payment to Springlake FPD and the Yolo County Chief Financial Officer. Such notice shall provide that failure to pay the full amount owed within 30 days of the notice shall be grounds for termination of this Agreement. If the amounts due are not paid within this 30-day period, City may withdraw from or terminate its participation in this Agreement, and all services to be provided under this Agreement shall cease 60 days from the end of the thirty-day period. In the event of termination for non-payment, Springlake FPD shall remain obligated to and shall pay City for services provided up to the date of termination in the amounts specified in this Agreement.

7. Partial Year Payment
a. In the event the Agreement is terminated at any time other than the end of the fiscal year (June 30), the Chief Financial Officer shall, within 60 days of the end of the fiscal year in which the Agreement was terminated, calculate the amount of City’s compensation prorated for the portion of the fiscal year in which the Agreement was terminated (“Partial Year Charge”). b. In calculating the Partial Year Charge, the Chief Financial Officer shall determine the number of days during the last fiscal year that City provided Services under this Agreement, divided by 365, and then multiplied by the real property taxes, fire suppression assessments, and County Contribution received by Springlake FPD for the Service Area in the last fiscal year in which City provided Services.

5 c. If the total compensation received by City in the last fiscal year exceeds the Partial Year Charge, then City shall pay to the Chief Financial Officer the difference within 30 days, and the Chief Financial Officer shall allocate such payment between Springlake FPD and County. If the total compensation received by City in the last fiscal year is less than the Partial Year Charge, then the Chief Financial Officer shall pay City the difference from Springlake’s next property tax allocation. No interest shall be due for any under- or over-compensation.

8. Insurance and Indemnification
a. City shall, at all times, maintain insurance coverage through Yolo County Public Agency Risk Management Insurance Authority
b. With the exception that this section shall in no event be construed to require indemnification to a greater extent than permitted under the public policy of the State of California, City shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Springlake FPD, County, and their respective officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, damages, demands, losses, defense costs, expenses (including attorney fees) and liability of any kind or nature arising out of or resulting from performance of the Services, provided that any such claim, damage, demand, loss, cost, expense or liability is caused in whole or in part by any negligent or intentional act or omission of City, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable.
c. With the exception that this section shall in no event be construed to require indemnification to a greater extent than permitted under the public policy of the State of California, Springlake FPD shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City, County, and their respective officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, damages, demands, losses, defense costs, expenses (including attorney fees) and liability of any kind or nature arising out of or resulting from performance of the Services, provided that any such claim, damage, demand, loss, cost, expense or liability is caused in whole or in part by any negligent or intentional act or omission of Springlake FPD, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable.
d. The responsibilities for defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnification obligations of this agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this agreement.

9. Entire Agreement

6 This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject of this Agreement, and no representations have been made or relied up on except as set forth herein. This Agreement supersedes all other agreements between the parties hereto. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written, fully executed agreement of the parties.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto set their signature as of the date first above named herein.

SPRINGLAKE FPD
By____________________________
Sheila A. Allen, Chair
Board of Directors
Attest:

Julie Dachtler, Senior Deputy Clerk
By_______________________________
(Seal)
Approved as to Form:
_________________________________
Philip Pogledich, County Counsel

COUNTY OF YOLO
By____________________________
Sheila A. Allen, Chair
Board of Supervisors
Attest:

Julie Dachtler, Senior Deputy Clerk
Board of Supervisors
By_______________________________
(Seal)
Approved as to Form:
_________________________________
Philip Pogledich, County Counsel

CITY OF WOODLAND
[insert signature block]

7 Exhibit A
Service Area

Exhibit A – City of Woodland Service Area

Southeast boundary at CR 124

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING FIRE

SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE

PROVISION OF FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES IN THE ELKHORN FIRE

PROTECTION DISTRICT AREA
WHEREAS, the Yolo Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) is considering a reorganization of the Elkhorn Fire Protection District (Elkhorn FPD), which may include dissolution of the district and annexation of its territory into the Springlake Fire Protection District, or other reorganization as determined by LAFCo; and
WHEREAS, the City of Woodland, the Springlake Fire Protection District, the County of Yolo, and the City of West Sacramento have developed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to ensure continuity of fire protection and emergency response services to the affected territory following any LAFCo-approved reorganization; and
WHEREAS, the MOU provides a framework under which the parties agree to enter into binding agreements for the provision of fire protection services upon the effective date of the reorganization; and
WHEREAS, the City of Woodland has negotiated an Agreement with the Springlake Fire Protection District and the County of Yolo for the provision of fire protection and emergency response services within a defined service area in the Elkhorn Fire Protection District territory; and
WHEREAS, under the Agreement, the City of Woodland will provide services including fire suppression, emergency medical response, hazardous materials response, and technical rescue services consistent with its existing service levels; and WHEREAS, the Agreement includes provisions for cost recovery through allocation of property tax revenues, existing fire suppression assessments, and additional annual contributions, ensuring that the provision of services does not adversely impact the City’s General Fund; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that entering into the MOU and associated Agreement supports regional collaboration, ensures continuity of fire protection services, and promotes efficient and sustainable delivery of emergency services within Yolo County.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1. Approval of MOU The City Council hereby approves the Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Fire Services between the City of Woodland, Springlake Fire Protection District, County of Yolo, and the City of West Sacramento.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves the Agreement between the City of Woodland, Springlake Fire Protection District, and the County of Yolo for the provision of fire protection services within the Elkhorn Fire Protection District service area.

SECTION 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to make final edits and take necessary actions execute the MOU and the Agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

SECTION 4. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to take all actions necessary and appropriate to implement and administer the MOU and Agreement.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 7th day of April 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ________________________________ Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.11
SUBJECT: 2026 Reappointment of Staff to Yolo County Waste Advisory Committee

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No.____ approving the appointment of Rosie Ledesma as the City of Woodland’s representative on the Yolo County Waste Advisory Committee for the next four-year term.

Staff Contact:

Rosie Ledesma, Environmental Resources Program Manager, (530) 661-2059, [email protected]

Background:

Pursuant to requirements of the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939), Yolo County in 1990 established the Yolo County Waste Advisory Committee. The purpose of the committee is to oversee and provide policy input to the Board of Supervisors on a range of solid waste issues, including implementation of the State-mandated waste reduction programs, integrated waste management, hazardous waste handling, and solid waste facilities master planning.

Membership in the committee includes one representative each from the cities of Woodland, Davis, West Sacramento, and Winters; one representative from an environmental organization; one representative from a special district; one representative from industry; and four representatives from the public. The city representatives are appointed by their respective city councils. Committee appointment terms are four years. In January 2022, the Council appointed Rosie Ledesma as the City of Woodland representative for the period ending January 31, 2026.

Discussion:

The programs addressed by the Waste Advisory Committee fall within the purview of the job duties of Environmental Resources Program Manager Rosie Ledesma, who is qualified to represent the City in solid waste matters. Staff believes that Ms. Ledesma is the most appropriate representative of the City of Woodland on the committee.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No.____ approving the appointment of Rosie Ledesma as the City of Woodland’s representative on the Yolo County Waste Advisory Committee for the next four-year term.

Prepared By: Rosie Ledesma, Environmental Resources Program Manager

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - 2026 Reappointment of Ledesma to WAC

RESOLUTION NO. ____

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

APPOINTING A REPRESENTATIVE TO SERVE ON THE

YOLO COUNTY WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 required each county to establish a task force to coordinate city source reduction and recycling activities and to prepare a county-wide siting element; and

WHEREAS, the County of Yolo adopted an ordinance to add Article 18 to Chapter 2 of Title 2 of the Yolo County Code creating the Yolo County Waste Advisory Committee; and

WHEREAS, said Waste Advisory Committee includes a representative of the City of Woodland who is appointed for a four-year term by the City Council; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has previously appointed Environmental Resources Program Manager Rosie Ledesma to serve the previous term that ended on January 31, 2026; and

WHEREAS, staff recommends that Environmental Resources Program Manager Rosie Ledesma is best qualified to continue to represent the City in solid waste matters.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby appoints Environmental Resources Program Manager Rosie Ledesma to serve as the City’s representative to the Yolo County Waste Advisory Committee for the next four-year term.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 7th day of April 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ________________________________ Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.12
SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes for February 2026

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the minutes from the February 23, 2026, Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting.

Staff Contact: Kris Bain, Community Services Program Manager, (530) 661-2002, [email protected]

Discussion: The minutes from the February 23, 2026, Parks & Recreation Commission meeting were approved at the last Parks and Recreation meeting on March 23, 2026.

Conclusion: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the minutes from the February 23, 2026, Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting.

Prepared by: Kris Bain, Community Services Program Manager Reviewed by: Christine Ferrara, Community Services Director

Attachments:

1. Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes February 2026

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.13
SUBJECT: Prohousing Incentive Program Application

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No.____, authorizing an application for, and receipt of, Prohousing Incentive Program funds.

Staff Contact:

Amanda Portier, Business & Community Engagement Specialist | (530) 661-5920, [email protected]

Background:

The California Department of Housing and Community Development's (HCD) Prohousing Incentive Program provides funding for planning and implementation activities related to housing and community development for municipalities that have been awarded a Prohousing Designation. The Program is funded through Chapter 364, Statutes of 2017 (SB 2, Atkins), which established the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund (Fund). The Fund utilizes real estate transaction fees collected at the county level to establish a permanent source of funding. Five percent of annual collections are deposited in a fund to be used for an incentive program. The program awards funds based on the applicant's jurisdiction size and Prohousing Designation Score.

On February 17, 2026, the City Council approved Resolution No. 8622 authorizing an application for, and receipt of, Prohousing Incentive Program funds in the amount of $950,000. However, it has been determined that the City is eligible for $980,000, so adopting this corrected resolution will allow the City to access an additional $30,000 to support key affordable housing projects.

Discussion:

The City of Woodland received a Prohousing Designation status on May 27, 2025. The Prohousing Incentive Program Round 4 Notice of Funding Availability was released September 30, 2025 for approximately $8 million, and applications are due March 31, 2026. Using the eligible award formula, the City is eligible for an award up to $980,000 ($500,000 base award from jurisdiction size plus $480,000 bonus award from the City's Prohousing Designation Score). If awarded, these funds will support affordable housing projects that advance the City's housing goals. This Council Resolution authorizes the City Manager to submit an application for funds and, if awarded, accept the funds.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No.____, authorizing an application for, and receipt of, Prohousing Incentive Program funds.

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - Prohousing Incentive Program_April 2026

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR, AND RECEIPT OF, PROHOUSING INCENTIVE PROGRAM FUNDS.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code 50470 et. Seq, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) is authorized to issue Guidelines as part of an incentive program (hereinafter referred to by the Department as the Prohousing Incentive Program or “PIP”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Woodland desires to submit a PIP grant application package (“Application”), on the forms provided by the Department, for approval of grant funding for eligible activities toward planning and implementation activities related to housing and community development as a result of meeting eligibility criteria including but not limited to Prohousing Designation; and
WHEREAS, the Department has issued Guidelines and Application on September 30, 2025 in the estimated amount of $8,000,000 for the PIP.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Department in response to the Notice of Funding Availability, and to apply for the PIP grant funds in a total amount not to exceed $980,000.

SECTION 2. In connection with the PIP grant, if the Application is approved by the Department, the City Manager of the City of Woodland is authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver on behalf of the Applicant, a State of California Agreement (Standard Agreement) for an amount up to $980,000, and any and all other documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to evidence and secure the PIP grant, the Applicant’s obligations related thereto, and all amendments thereto.

SECTION 3. The Applicant shall be subject to the terms and conditions as specified in the Guidelines, and the Standard Agreement provided by the Department after approval. The Application and any and all accompanying documents are incorporated in full as part of the Standard Agreement. Any and all activities funded, information provided, and timelines represented in the Application will be enforceable through the fully executed Standard Agreement. Pursuant to the Guidelines and in conjunction with the terms of the Standard Agreement, the Applicant hereby agrees to use the funds for eligible uses and allowable expenditures in the manner presented and specifically identified in the approved Application.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 7th day of April 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ________________________________ Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.14
SUBJECT: Approve the Plans, Specifications, and Bid
Authorization for the 2026 Road Maintenance
Project, CIP 26-01

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving the project plans and specifications for the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01 and authorizing the bid advertisement.

Staff Contact:

Diana Ayón, Senior Associate Civil Engineer, (530) 661-5967, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The project is identified in the current Capital Budget as CIP 26-01 with a total budget of $1,535,000.

The project funding consists of $1,510,000 in Measure F funding and $25,000 in Water Enterprise Funds to fund improvements associated with water utility conflicts. This project funding is consistent with the approved Capital Budget and the Measure F Spending Plan.

The project budget includes the costs for design, project management, construction management/inspection, and construction.

There is no impact to the General Fund.

Background:

In November 2016, Woodland voters approved Measure F, which extended the ½ cent supplemental sales tax. The 12-year approval of Measure F, a General Tax, includes funding for general city services including pavement maintenance.

Staff maintains a pavement management program that tracks pavement conditions and aims to address pavement maintenance on local streets with the Measure F funds.

Pavement maintenance is significantly different than pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction, which repairs failed roadways. The goal of pavement maintenance is to prevent reactive road repair by proactively preserving and maintaining pavements in fair condition which have not yet deteriorated to the point of needing rehabilitation.

To increase cost efficiency and minimize public inconvenience, pavement maintenance for local/residential streets has historically been completed in discrete ‘zones’ of the city. Geographically bounding projects reduces the cost for construction and traffic control; it also increases the effectiveness of management and inspection. Over 14 years, the city completed pavement maintenance projects in all of the 14 designated zones. With road maintenance having been completed on local roads in all 14 designated zones, staff shifted its focus over the last several years to collector streets in need of preventative maintenance services. Starting with the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, staff is now focusing again on maintenance on local roads in zones while still addressing some collectors.

Discussion:

The project is scoped to provide pavement maintenance seals on all local roads and construct ADA ramp improvements within Zone 1 of the City. This is the area bounded by Main Street, CR98, West Street, and the northern City limits. There are also segmented additive alternates on Ashley Avenue including asphalt grind and overlay, striping improvements, and ADA ramps.

The local roads in the zone will receive differing treatments chosen as appropriate for the age and condition of the roads. Applying the right treatments at the right time is the most effective method of pavement preservation and extending the useful life of the roadway. ADA improvements are included with the project in accordance with State and Federal requirements.

Upon Council authorization, project bids will be solicited and staff anticipates returning to Council for a contract award in May 2026 for construction to start this summer.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving the project plans and specifications for the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01 and authorizing the bid advertisement.

Prepared by: Diana Ayón, Senior Associate Civil Engineer Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, Community Development Director / City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution_CIP 26-01

2. 2026 Road Maintenance-Project Map

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 2026 ROAD MAINTENANCE PROJECT, CIP 26-01; AND AUTHORIZING BID

ADVERTISEMENT

WHEREAS, the City of Woodland has $1,535,000 of Measure F and Water Enterprise funds identified in the Capital Budget to maintain and extend the life of Woodland's street network, referred to as the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01 (the “Project”); and

WHEREAS, the funding is consistent with the Capital Budget and the Measure F Spending Plan; and

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to expend the funds and to construct the Project improvements; and

WHEREAS, the Project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is considered exempt under the Existing Facilities exemption, CEQA Guideline 15301(c).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves the plans and specifications for the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01, which are available on file with the City Clerk.

SECTION 2. The City Council authorizes City staff to advertise the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01 for bids, with construction anticipated to begin this summer.

SECTION 3. The City Council finds that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15301(c).

PASSED, APPROIVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 7th day of April 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________ ________________________________ Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.15
SUBJECT: Fire Station #4 (CIP 16-10) – Award Design-Build Contract for Phase 1 Preconstruction services to
CORE West, Inc.

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____ to authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with CORE West, Inc. for phase 1 pre- construction design services for the Fire Station #4 progressive design-build project, CIP 16-10, for an amount not to exceed $356,800 and approve a contract contingency of 10% ($35,680).

Staff Contacts:

Eric Zane, Fire Chief, (530) 661-5861, [email protected] Ed Wisniewski, Principal Civil Engineer, (530) 661-5975, [email protected]

Council Goals:

This action advances key initiatives called for within the Strengthen Public Safety & Infrastructure Goal of the City Council Priority Goals & Strategic Plan, including advancement of the design-build project to construct a new fire station at E. Gibson Road and Bourn Drive.

Fiscal Impact:

Construction of the fire station is being funded from a variety of sources. A portion of the project has been included in the City's development impact fee program and in the Spring Lake Infrastructure Fee (SLIF) program, which established fees to be collected at the time of building permit to go toward the cost of constructing new public facilities and infrastructure needed to serve new growth.

Additionally, development agreements approved for various housing projects have been negotiated to include payment of a Community Benefit payment, which is also intended, in part, to contribute towards construction costs for a new station.

Not including the purchase of the site, the General Fund has allocated $1 million from reserves towards the project. The Measure F spending plan, approved for FY2024/25, allocated $2 million toward construction of the fire station. Additionally, as of July 1, 2025, the development impact fee fund has accumulated more than $4 million in available funding for the project, and the SLIF fund has $1.3 million available. Based on these amounts, there is more than $8 million in currently available funding for the project, with anticipated future collections from impact fees of close to $1 million over the coming years depending on development activity.

Total project costs are not fully known at this time. However, based on research of recently completed and comparably sized stations built within the region, it is estimated design and construction of the new station will cost in the range of $9M to $11M. Therefore, additional funding sources may need to be identified to complete the project. Potential funding sources could include additional use of Measure F sales tax revenues, proceeds from the sale of City-owned surplus land at the project site, and internal or external borrowing. The project has sufficient funds to cover the proposed phase 1 contract with the selected design-build team. Staff will return to Council with a complete funding plan after the pre-construction services identified in this phase 1 contract conclude with a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) for final design & construction and the total project costs are clearly defined.

Finally, although additional personnel will not be required to staff the new station, there will be additional ongoing operating and maintenance costs associated with the new facility. Those costs will also be estimated and included within future budget discussions should the Council direct staff to proceed as recommended.

Background:

In 2018, the City acquired the Willow Spring School Site at E. Gibson Road and Bourn Drive from the School District with the intent of constructing a new fire station to better serve the southeast area of Woodland, including Spring Lake. After considerable analysis to define the programmatic needs of the new fire station, as well as the City’s fire master plan, the following project scope was identified for fire station #4:

Proposed Fire Station #4 Scope
• Approximately 1 acre developed site
• Paved access to accommodate apparatus turning movements with access from Bourn Drive • Two drive through single depth apparatus bays
• Interior living quarters to accommodate four personnel 24/7, 365 days a year • Contamination reduction and containment features / facility design • Dayroom sized for current and future staffing and functional as training space • Office Area equipped with a publicly accessible customer service counter and ADA restroom • Commercial grade kitchen
• Three dedicated office spaces for Company Officer plus 1–2 spaces for collateral assignments designed for future conversion to dorm rooms when/if needed. • Fitness room
• Fleet maintenance and reserve storage outbuilding
• Energy efficient features and solar panels
• Construction shall be durable to ensure low maintenance and long-lasting, consistent with a life cycle cost analysis of 50+ years.

On September 2, 2025, the City Council received a presentation about advancing design and construction of the project. Affirming the preferred project delivery method was discussed.

Traditionally, City projects are constructed using the Design-Bid-Build (or “hard bid”) method of delivery. For vertical construction projects such as this one, alternative methods are often employed to deliver the project in a quicker, more efficient manner, and with lower risk of excessive change orders. After considerable research and conversing with other agencies in the region, staff recommended that the project be delivered through the Progressive Design-Build approach and Council directed staff to proceed accordingly.

The progressive design-build (PDB) project delivery method combines design and construction services under a single contract (typically held with the general contractor), with a focus on early collaboration and a 2-phased contracting approach. This delivery method begins with a collaborative design development phase (phase 1) where the City and the design-build team work together to define the project design, schedule, and budget. In phase 2, the design is finalized, and the contractor constructs the project.

On February 3, 2026, Council authorized staff to proceed with advertising the request for qualifications (RFQ) for teams to design and construct the new fire station. The selection of the design-build team was based primarily on their qualifications and experience demonstrated through the RFQ process, which included a written statement of qualifications (SOQ) and interviews. Given that the design and budget lack detail initially, construction cost and schedule is not a significant criterion of the procurement process.

Discussion:

Staff issued the RFQ for design-build teams on February 9, 2026, and received six SOQs on March 9, 2026. A selection committee made up of four City staff members (2 from Community Development and 2 from the Fire Department) was assembled to score and rank the proposing teams. After reviewing the written SOQs, the top four teams were brought in for interviews on March 25, 2026.

The team of CORE West, Inc. (contractor) and TSK (architect) received the highest ranking at the conclusion of the selection process. The CORE + TSK team demonstrated a proven partnership with extensive experience in delivering fire station projects at a high value to their clients. Their proposal aligned closely with the needs of the project with the promise of the most value for the budget identified by the City. They complied with all requirements of the RFQ process, which included submission of a proposed fee for phase 1 (pre-construction) services. The phase 1 fee of $356,800 submitted by CORE + TSK was the 2nd lowest of the submitting teams. They also provided, as a percentage, the self-performance and subcontractor fee of 4.95%, which was the lowest of the submitting teams.

Staff is recommending award of the phase 1 design-build contract for pre-construction services, where the design-build team will work closely with the City to refine the design of the fire station. This process is a highly collaborative and efficient approach to verifying the feasibility and constructability of preliminary designs. The contractor is required to submit comprehensive and transparent cost estimates for the City to consider in development of the final project budget. Pricing will be presented to the City through an open book process where subcontracted work is procured through a competitive bid process. Once the design is sufficiently defined (typically 65% or “design development” level drawings), the contractor will submit a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) and schedule for construction. At this point, the City can choose to accept the proposal, and the contract is amended to include phase 2 (final design and construction) services. Although unlikely, if an agreement on the GMP cannot be reached, there are provisions in the phase 1 contract to allow the City to “off ramp” and pursue alternative means of bidding and constructing the project.

With Council approval to award a contract to CORE West, Inc., the next step in the process would be execution of the phase 1 contract, including proof of insurance and bonding requirements. Once all phase 1 services are completed (likely fall of 2026), staff will return to Council to approve the design and amend the contract to the final GMP, thereby triggering the construction phase of the contract.

Construction is anticipated to begin as early as fall of 2026 or winter 2027 (weather dependent).

Another benefit of the progressive design-build process is that it offers the potential for early grading and site improvement plan packages to allow for construction of site elements to proceed while the building details are finalized.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____ to authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with CORE West, Inc. for phase 1 pre-construction design services for the Fire Station #4 progressive design-build project, CIP 16-10, for an amount not to exceed $356,800 and approve a contract contingency of 10% ($35,680).

Prepared by: Ed Wisniewski, Principal Civil Engineer

Reviewed by: Eric Zane, Fire Chief
Brent Meyer, Community Development Director/City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - CIP 16-10

82093.00298\29830144.2
RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH CORE WEST, INC. FOR PHASE 1 PRECONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE FIRE STATION #4 PROGRESSIVE DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT, CIP 16-10

WHEREAS, the Project is identified in the current capital budget as the Fire Station #4 Project (CIP #16-10); and

WHEREAS, the project is currently funded in the Capital Budget at $3.2 million, with another $5 million in development fees earmarked for the project. Additional appropriation of funds may be requested after the design is completed with phase 1 contract efforts and a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) for construction is known; and

WHEREAS, on September 2, 2025, the City Council authorized staff to proceed with delivering the project through a progressive design-build (PDB) process, which includes a 2- phased contracting approach (phase 1: design and cost identification; phase 2: final design & construction), and

WHEREAS, with the progressive design-build process, a team of designer & contractor is chosen through a qualifications-based selection process, which is followed by a collaborative design development phase where the City and design-build team work together to define the project design, schedule, and budget; and

WHEREAS, on February 3, 2026, Council authorized staff to proceed with advertising the request for qualifications (RFQ) for teams to design and construct the new fire station; and

WHEREAS, on February 9, 2026, the RFQ was advertised, and on March 9, 2026, staff received 6 statements of qualifications; and

WHEREAS, a selection committee made up of four City staff members (2 from Community Development and 2 from the Fire Department) was assembled to score and rank the proposing teams; and

WHEREAS, the team of CORE West, Inc. (contractor) and TSK (architect) was selected through the competitive quality-based selection process; and

WHEREAS, the CORE + TSK team has extensive experience in delivering fire station projects through the progressive design-build delivery model; and

WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to approve this contract for phase 1 pre-construction services and authorize its execution through the adoption of this Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

82093.00298\29830144.2
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a contract with CORE West, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $356,800 and approves a ten percent (10%) contract contingency in the amount of $35,680, for phase 1 pre-construction services on the Fire Station #4 Progressive Design-Build Project (CIP 16-10). The City Attorney is hereby authorized to make clarifying and confirming changes so long as the total dollar amount authorized in the contract is within the Council authorization.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held the 7th day of April 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ________________________________ Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.16
SUBJECT: Reallocation of Previously Approved Affordable Housing Funds to Support the Yolano Donnelly
Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. ___, 1) Approving the reallocation of up to $400,000 from the City's previously approved $1,500,000 affordable housing funding commitment for Tupelo Family Apartments to support completion of the Yolano Donnelly Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project ("Project"); 2) Directing that the remaining balance of the previously approved commitment, up to $1,500,000, remain available to support Tupelo Family Apartments, subject to the terms and conditions previously approved by the City Council, as outlined in Resolution 8551 (Attachment 2); and 3) Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Grant Agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of Yolo (Yolo County Housing) in an amount up to $400,000 for the Yolano Donnelly Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project in a form prepared and approved by the City Attorney and take such other actions and execute such documents as necessary to make the City grant and ensure completion of the Project.

Staff Contact:

Erika Bumgardner, Deputy Community Development Director, (530) 661-5886, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

There is no General Fund impact. This action does not increase the City’s previously approved $1,500,000 affordable housing funding commitment (Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fees Fund 1327); rather, it reallocates up to $400,000 of that commitment to support the Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project, with the remaining balance continuing to support Tupelo Family Apartments.

Background:

On July 15, 2025, the City Council approved a $1,500,000 affordable housing funding commitment in connection with Tupelo Family Apartments, the first phase of the broader Yolano Donnelly neighborhood revitalization effort. The approved action authorized the use of Affordable Housing In- Lieu Fees Fund dollars to support development of the 73-unit Tupelo Family Apartments project and to leverage outside financing for the project.

As described in the prior staff report, the larger Yolano Donnelly effort is intended to reposition and revitalize a long-standing public housing neighborhood through a comprehensive, phased strategy. In September 2024, Yolo County Housing was awarded a $500,000 Choice Neighborhoods Planning grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to prepare a Transformation Plan for Yolano Donnelly and the surrounding neighborhood.

Yolo County Housing, together with development partners Brinshore Development and Operative Office, is now advancing the Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project. Staff is recommending that the City reallocate up to $400,000 of the previously approved $1,500,000 commitment, so those funds may be used to complete the planning effort that will provide the framework for the redevelopment and modernization of the Yolano Donnelly neighborhood. The grant agreement will include a

regulatory agreement to ensure the new units created meet the City's affordable housing requirements.

Discussion:

The Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project is a critical pre-development and community planning effort that will culminate in a federal Housing and Urban Development (HUD) required Transformative Plan in 2026. The planning process includes more than 20 months of engagement with the residents of Yolano Donnelly, the surrounding neighborhood, and the broader Woodland community. This work is intended to ensure that the redevelopment strategy reflects community priorities while establishing a realistic and implementable path toward neighborhood revitalization.

The Transformative Plan will serve as the blueprint for redevelopment and modernization of the Yolano Donnelly neighborhood. Among other things, the Plan is expected to outline a specific housing strategy that would replace all 132 existing units of obsolete public housing with a new mixed-income community of approximately 400 total units. The Plan will identify anticipated building types, unit mixes, affordability levels, and the populations to be served in each new building.

In addition to the housing strategy, the planning effort will include a "people plan" and a "neighborhood plan." The people plan will focus on resident-centered investments and services designed to improve quality of life and long-term outcomes, including educational opportunities, income growth, access to fresh food, childcare, and medical services. The neighborhood plan will identify physical improvements and community enhancements such as transportation and transit access, neighborhood amenities, park and community space, and public safety considerations. Each of these plan components will include detailed goals, objectives, and strategies, along with baseline metrics and long-term performance targets.

The Project also includes completion of a market study tied to the housing plan and a NEPA Phase I environmental review based on the overall redevelopment concept. Completion of these foundational tasks is necessary for the City and its partners to move from planning into implementation and to position the project for future state and federal funding opportunities.

Once the Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project is completed and HUD approves the Transformative Plan, the partnership will be eligible to apply for future Choice Neighborhoods Implementation funding. Historic implementation awards have ranged from approximately $20 million to $50 million per project. While no future award is guaranteed, completion of the planning process is a critical step toward making Yolano Donnelly competitive for implementation funding and advancing redevelopment of this 60-plus-year-old neighborhood.

The Choice Neighborhoods Planning effort has already elevated local and regional attention to the broader Yolano-Donnelly revitalization initiative and helped position related projects for additional investment. To date, this momentum has contributed to a $2.3 million commitment from Alta California Regional Center and a $28 million Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) award, both toward Tupelo, and a $1.5 million award from Sutter Health for related neighborhood improvements and services. A portion of the Sutter Health funding will support the Choice Neighborhoods required Early Action Activity, including development of a mobile provider hub to bring medical and dental services directly to residents, expanded access to the Woodland Public Library Bookmobile, and creation of a shaded outdoor gathering space to enhance the Lemen Avenue area near the Taller Arte Del Nuevo Amanecer (TANA) facility.

Staff believes that allowing up to $400,000 of the previously approved City commitment to be used for the Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project is consistent with the City Council’s broader objective of supporting the revitalization of the Yolano Donnelly neighborhood. Rather than changing the City’s

total funding commitment, the recommended action refines how a portion of that commitment may be deployed so that the City can help complete the planning framework necessary to unlock future redevelopment, modernization, and external funding opportunities.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. ___, 1) Approving the reallocation of up to $400,000 from the City's previously approved $1,500,000 affordable housing funding commitment for Tupelo Family Apartments to support completion of the Yolano Donnelly Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project ("Project"); 2) Directing that the remaining balance of the previously approved commitment, up to $1,500,000, remain available to support Tupelo Family Apartments, subject to the terms and conditions previously approved by the City Council, as outlined in Resolution 8551 (Attachment 2); and 3) Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Grant Agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of Yolo (Yolo County Housing) in an amount up to $400,000 for the Yolano Donnelly Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project in a form prepared and approved by the City Attorney and take such other actions and execute such documents as necessary to make the City grant and ensure completion of the Project.

Prepared by: Erika Bumgardner, Community Development Department Deputy Director

Attachments:

1. Reso_8551 Tupelo Funding Commitment

2. Proposed Resolution_Yolano Donnelly Planning Project

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND APPROVING THE REALLOCATION OF UP TO $400,000 OF PREVIOUSLY

APPROVED AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUNDS TO SUPPORT THE YOLANO

DONNELLY CHOICE NEIGHBORHOODS PLANNING PROJECT
WHEREAS, on July 15, 2025, the City Council approved a $1,500,000 affordable housing funding commitment from the Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fees Fund (1327) in connection with Tupelo Family Apartments, which was identified as an early project supporting the broader revitalization of the Yolano Donnelly neighborhood; and WHEREAS, Yolo County Housing was one of 13 awardees nationwide selected by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for a Choice Neighborhoods Planning grant to support preparation of a Transformative Plan for the redevelopment of Yolano Donnelly and the surrounding neighborhood; and
WHEREAS, the Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project includes extensive community engagement and preparation of a Transformative Plan expected to be completed in 2026 that will provide the framework for redevelopment and modernization of the Yolano Donnelly neighborhood; and
WHEREAS, the Transformative Plan is anticipated to include a housing plan for replacement of the existing 132 units of obsolete public housing with a new mixed-income community of approximately 400 total units, together with a people plan and neighborhood plan addressing services, transportation, amenities, safety, and related implementation strategies; and WHEREAS, the Project also includes a market study and NEPA Phase I environmental review necessary to support the overall redevelopment strategy and future funding applications; and
WHEREAS, completion of the Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project and HUD approval of the Transformative Plan are necessary steps toward future eligibility for Choice Neighborhoods Implementation funding; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that allowing up to $400,000 of the previously approved $1,500,000 commitment to be used for the Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project will further the City’s affordable housing and neighborhood revitalization objectives without increasing the City’s total previously approved financial commitment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves the reallocation of up to $400,000 from the City’s previously approved $1,500,000 affordable housing funding commitment to support completion of the Yolano Donnelly Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby directs that the remaining balance of the previously approved commitment, up to $1,500,000, remain available for Tupelo Family Apartments, subject to the terms and conditions previously approved by the City Council, as amended.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a Grant Agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of Yolo (Yolo County Housing) in an amount up to $400,000 for the Yolano Donnelly Choice Neighborhoods Planning Project in a form prepared and approved by the City Attorney and take such other actions and execute such documents, including a regulatory agreement, as necessary to make the City grant and ensure completion of the Project consistent with the City’s Affordable Housing Ordinance.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on this 7th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

_________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_________________________ _________________________________ Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.17
SUBJECT: Authorization for the City’s Participation in SACOG 2026 Federal Funding Programs

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, 1) Authorizing the City to apply for grant funding through the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) 2026 Federal Funding Programs;
2) Authorizing Community Development staff to establish and submit the City of Woodland’s application priorities for the SACOG 2026 Federal Funding Programs; and 3) Authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary grant documents and ensure timely compliance with project delivery requirements.

Staff Contact:

Clara Olmedo, Associate Engineer – (530) 661-5824, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

There is no impact to the General Fund.

Background:

The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) has announced three programs for the 2026 Federal Funding Cycle. These funding opportunities are available to sponsoring agencies within the six-county SACOG region. The programs include the System Preservation Program, System Performance Program, and Next Generation Solutions & Clean Air Program.

The call for projects for the System Preservation Program opened on March 19, 2026, and applications are due May 8, 2026. The System Performance and Next Generation Solutions and Clean Air Programs will open and have application deadlines in Fall 2026.

Discussion:

The City plans to submit an application for SACOG’s System Preservation Program, which is currently open. A new requirement for the SACOG program application is that the City must adopt a resolution authorizing the City of Woodland to apply for grant funding through SACOG’s 2026 federal funding programs. The resolution designates the City manager to establish and submit application priorities and authorizes them to execute all required grant documents and compliance with project delivery deadlines.

The proposed application is for the Central Woodland Road Maintenance and Connectivity Project.

The project includes improvements along College Street (Topaz Way to Gibson Road), Beamer Street (Cottonwood Street to East Street), and Cross Street (West Street to East Street). Planned improvements include roadway rehabilitation through grind and overlay, upgrading existing bike lanes to buffered lanes where feasible, installing new bike lanes or shared lane markings where needed, constructing new sidewalks along Cross Street between Sixth and East Streets, installing ADA- compliant curb ramps, implementing pedestrian improvements, and upgrading traffic signals at all signalized intersections within the project limits. Staff is recommending that this project be the City's only grant application for the System Preservation Program.

Total project cost is currently estimated at $10 million. The project has secured $3 million in State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funding and $451,750 of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding through the SACOG 4-County and State HSIP programs. The remaining $6.5 million is currently proposed to be funded by SB1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation (RMRA) funding.

If additional grant funding is awarded, it will reduce the need for RMRA funding, leaving that funding available for other projects. Staff will continue to pursue road rehabilitation and active transportation grant opportunities to further offset RMRA funding commitments.

The project schedule is proposed to start with design during the Summer of 2026. Construction is expected to last approximately 2 years, starting in summer of 2028 and concluding in late 2029. The construction timeline will depend on the availability of any additional grant funding secured for the project.

Staff will return to Council prior to submitting applications for the remaining SACOG grant programs.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, 1) Authorizing the City to apply for grant funding through the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) 2026 Federal Funding Programs;
2) Authorizing Community Development staff to establish and submit the City of Woodland’s application priorities for the SACOG 2026 Federal Funding Programs; and 3) Authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary grant documents and ensure timely compliance with project delivery requirements.

Prepared by: Clara Olmedo, Associate Engineer
Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, Community Development Director/ City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - 2026 SACOG Funding Programs

RESOLUTION NO. ___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

AUTHORIZING APPLICATIONS FOR GRANT FUNDING FROM THE
SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SACOG) 2026 FEDERAL FUNDING PROGRAMS; AUTHORIZING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO SUBMIT CITY OF WOODLAND SACOG 2026 FEDERAL FUNDING PROGRAM APPLICATION PRIORITIES; AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL GRANT DOCUMENTS AND TIMELY

PROJECT DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS

WHEREAS, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) has announced three 2026 Federal Funding Cycle Programs (Funding Programs), which are open to sponsoring agencies within the six-county SACOG region: System Preservation Program, System Performance Program, and Next Generation Solutions & Clean Air Program; and

WHEREAS, the System Preservation Program invests in maintaining and resurfacing major roadways that keep people and goods moving; and

WHEREAS, eligible projects for Funding Programs must be listed in the 2025 Blueprint or fit within 2025 Blueprint lump-sum project categories including but not limited to road maintenance and reconstruction, transit vehicle replacements, operational improvements, Intelligent Transportation Systems, and bicycle and pedestrian investments; and

WHEREAS, SACOG limits Funding Programs grant applications to no more than three applications per sponsoring agency for any one of the three different Funding Programs to SACOG, up to a maximum of nine total applications per sponsoring agency; and

WHEREAS, applicants shall affirm their commitment to delivering projects in accordance with the requirements of Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Program and Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program, as applicable; and

WHEREAS, grant proposals for construction work shall obligate Funding Program dollars for construction activities no later than the end of federal fiscal year 2028-29; and

WHEREAS, SACOG will not provide additional federal or state funding in the event that cost overruns are identified; and

WHEREAS, project sponsors shall commit to providing local matching dollars, typically

11.47% of the total project cost; and

WHEREAS, SACOG requires that if awarded federal funds by the SACOG Board, City of Woodland staff responsible for project delivery must attend quarterly project delivery meetings with SACOG staff to receive assistance until project closeout; and

WHEREAS, the City council wishes to authorize the City to apply for grant funding through SACOG Federal Funding Programs; and

WHEREAS, SACOG requires that if awarded federal funds by the SACOG Board, City of Woodland staff responsible for project delivery must attend quarterly project delivery meetings with SACOG staff to receive assistance until project closeout; and

WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to authorize the Community Development Department Staff to establish and submit the City of Woodland’s application priorities for the SACOG federal funding programs; and

WHEREAS, the City council wishes to authorize the City of Woodland Community Development Department Staff to apply for grant funding through SACOG Federal Funding Programs; and

WHEREAS, City Council wishes to authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all necessary grant documents and ensure timely compliance with project delivery requirements through the adoption of this Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby authorizes City of Woodland Community Development Department Staff to submit the following application for 2026 Six-County Federal Funding Cycle Programs as its priority.

Central Woodland Road Maintenance and Connectivity Project (Beamer, College & Cross streets roadway rehabilitation and bike/ped improvements)

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute all documents necessary to committing City of Woodland to federal, state and regional funding and project delivery requirements, including but not limited to abiding by Funding Program guidelines.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby acknowledges that in the event of receiving an award by the SACOG Board of Funding Program dollars, the City of Woodland will be required to abide by multiple timely use of funding requirements described in Funding Program guidelines and SACOG’s Regional Delivery Policies, including but not limited to, obligating federal funding no later than the end of federal fiscal year 2028-2029 for construction activities, committing to securing required local match dollars, acknowledge that SACOG does not cover cost overruns, and commits staff to attend delivery meetings until project closeout.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 7th day of April 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ________________________________ Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.18
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes of March 3, 2026 and March 17, 2026.

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the minutes of the Joint Regular City Council/Woodland Finance Authority Meetings of March 3, 2026 and March 17, 2026.

Attachments:

1. Draft meeting minutes for March 3, 2026

2. Draft meeting minutes for March 17, 2026

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: F.19
SUBJECT: Support for Budget Request from GGRF for
Sustainable Food Biomanufacturing

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council submit a letter of support for Assembly Member Ash Kalra's budget request from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) to establish a research and development grant program for sustainable food and ingredient biomanufacturing in California.

Staff Contact:

Spencer Bowen, Communication & Strategic Policies Manager | [email protected], (530) 661-5808

Background:

Since the 1800s, Woodland has been home to food and agricultural innovation and leadership.

Today, as part of a broad coalition of partners including University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources (UC ANR), Woodland's local startup incubator AgStart, the Greater Sacramento Economic Council, and more, the City seeks to support further investment in our state's food and ag biomanufacturing economy.

Discussion:

California State Assembly Member Ash Kalra has offered a budget request from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) to establish a research and development grant program for sustainable food and ingredient biomanufacturing in California. This investment is a crucial, high-impact strategy for achieving California’s ambitious climate goals, including the mandate to reduce harmful methane emissions, while investing in California’s research ecosystem and economic development. As one of the nation's foremost food and ag hubs, our region (and Woodland's 190+ food and ag industry partners) would stand to benefit from this important R&D investment.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council submit a letter of support for Assembly Member Ash Kalra's budget request from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) to establish a research and development grant program for sustainable food and ingredient biomanufacturing in California.

Attachments:

1. Woodland Ash Kalra GG Support Letter 04.07.26

April 7, 2026

The Honorable Ash Kalra
California State Assembly
State Capitol, P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249

RE: Support for Budget Request from GGRF for Sustainable Food Biomanufacturing

Dear Assemblymember Kalra,

On behalf of the City of Woodland, I write to express our strong support for your budget request from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) to establish a research and development grant program for sustainable food and ingredient biomanufacturing in California. This investment is a crucial strategy for achieving California’s ambitious climate goals, including the mandate to reduce harmful methane emissions, while investing in California’s research ecosystem and economic development.

The global food system is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, especially methane. Investing in the sustainable food biomanufacturing sector, which includes foods produced from plants, fermentation, and cell cultivation, offers a direct and scalable pathway to decarbonize our food supply while strengthening the state's economic resilience. The grant program will prioritize utilizing California crops and their byproducts as fit-for-purpose, high-value inputs for protein alternatives.

Public investment in agricultural research is a proven economic engine, with studies showing that every dollar invested can generate up to $20 in economic activity. This funding would advance research in California academic institutions that are pioneering advancements in plant and fermentation sciences and cellular agriculture. Projects will also seek to build new uses and expand markets for key California crops, including almonds and almond byproducts, walnuts, microalgae, pistachios, and tomatoes, with the potential to create new opportunities for California farmers.

Furthermore, this investment would secure California’s leadership in a rapidly growing global market, creating new high-wage jobs in food science, biology, engineering, and manufacturing across the state. Other leading economies, including the United States at the federal level, the European Union, and countries across Asia, are already making significant public investments in these key technologies to secure a competitive advantage and reap the economic benefits.

As a longtime food and agriculture hub, Woodland urges your colleagues to support this investment in sustainable food biomanufacturing research and development.

Signed,

Tom Stallard
Mayor, City of Woodland

Mayra Vega, Mayor Pro Tempore

Tania Garcia-Cadena, Council Member
Rich Lansburgh, Council Member David Moreno, Council Member

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: April 7, 2026
ITEM #: G.20
SUBJECT: Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council:
1) Receive a presentation from Yolo Transit District staff regarding the Yolo Active Transportation Corridors (YATC) Plan, and
2) Provide feedback and comments to Yolo Transit District regarding the YATC Plan.

Staff Contact:

Brent Meyer, City Engineer and Community Development Director, 530-661-5947, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

Costs associated with developing the YATC plan were funded by a $1.2 million federal RAISE grant.

Background:

The Yolo Active Transportation Corridors (YATC) Plan is an active transportation plan for a network of multi use trails and bicycle facilities that will help to address barriers to mobility for low-income and minority residents of Yolo County. In 2021, this planning project was awarded $1.2 million in federal funds from the Rebuilding Americans Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) discretionary grant program

YATC accomplishes three objectives:

1. Establish a long-term vision and planning document for active transportation corridors in Yolo County

2. Establish priorities and complete construction documents for at least one (1) and up to three (3) of the 53 recommended corridors, thereby positioning the project(s) for discretionary grant funding

3. Replace the 2013 Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan

Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Advisory Committee:

YoloTD has given three formal updates to the YATC Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) over the course of the plan’s development:

September 25, 2024 — YoloTD staff provided an overview of results of Phase 1 outreach including themes of feedback received, advance input from the TAC on draft project prioritization criteria, and preliminary improvement corridors.

May 22, 2025 — The TAC received a presentation on Phase 2 outreach, finalized draft prioritization criteria, and a recommendation to advance two segments to design: 1) Madison-Esparto, 2) Davis- Woodland.

January 22, 2026 — Presented the draft YATC plan to the TAC for recommended action. The TAC deferred action, requesting 1) additional review time and, 2) YoloTD return in March for action.

The YATC TAC representatives from the City are Katie Wurzel, Principal Civil Engineer and Clara Olmedo, Associate Engineer.

Discussion:

YoloTD staff are scheduling presentations of the YATC plan to various Board and advisory bodies for feedback prior to approval by the YoloTD Board of Directors and Yolo County Board of Supervisors.

City staff anticipates future discussion at the YTD TAC regarding project prioritization of grant funding requests relative to other transportation related grant funding priorities that the City would have. Staff would also anticipate additional discussion regarding maintenance strategies and funding for the constructed improvements.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council:
1) Receive a presentation from Yolo Transit District staff regarding the Yolo Active Transportation Corridors (YATC) Plan, and
2) Provide feedback and comments to Yolo Transit District regarding the YATC Plan

Prepared by: Brent Meyer, City Engineer and Community Development Director

Attachments:

1. Item X - YATC - Staff Report - Att-A - Main Report

2. YATC - Staff Report - ATT-B - Implementation Strategy

YOLO
Active Transportation
Corridors Plan
Draft Plan 2026
Y
A
T
C
AATTACHMENT:A

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
YoloTD Staff
Brenda Lomeli, Associate Transportation
Planner
Brian Abbanat, Director of Planning
Lola Torney, Senior Transportation Planner
Autumn Bernstein, Executive Director
Yolo Transportation District
Board of Directors
Jesse Loren, Council Member
Lucas Frerichs, Vice Chair
Dr. Dawnté Early, Board Member
Josh Chapman, Board Member
Mayra Vega, Board Member
Kelly Fong Rivas, Ex-Officio
Sukhi Johal, Ex-Officio
Citizen's Advisory Committee
Lisa Baker
Olin Woods
Mollie D’ Agostino
Patrick Guild
Steven Streeter
Andrew Furillo

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................2 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................4 Vision & Goals ..................................................................................................................................8 Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................18 Community & Stakeholder Engagement ................................................................68 Active Transportation Corridor Identification and Prioritization .............76 Active Transportation Toolkit ............................................................................................90 Community Active Transportation Improvements ..........................................114 Implementation and Funding .......................................................................................144 Appendix A ..................................................................................................................64 Thank you to the residents of Yolo County, whose
valuable time and feedback informed this plan.

Technical Advisory Committee
City of Davis
City of West Sacramento
City of Woodland
Yolo County
Yolo Solano AQMD
Caltrans District 3
UC Davis
Other
YATC Steering Committee
Project Team
Fehr & Peers
Place It!

PRAIRIEFORM
Zander Westbrook Design
2 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Table of Contents | 3

EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY
Yolo Active Transportation
Corridors Plan (Draft 2026)
The Yolo Active Transportation
Corridors (YATC) Plan establishes a
long term, implementable strategy
to improve walking, biking, and
rolling throughout unincorporated
Yolo County. The Plan responds to
documented active transportation
infrastructure issues and deficiencies
and emphasizes removing barriers to
active transportation for historically
underserved communities.

Vision and Goals
The Plan envisions a connected,
and low stress countywide active
transportation network that supports
everyday travel, recreation, public
health, and economic vitality. Core
objectives include expanding
the countywide trail system,
removing active travel barriers for
marginalized communities, and
strengthening connections both
within and between unincorporated
communities and nearby cities.

Purpose and Need
Most unincorporated areas of Yolo
County lack continuous sidewalks,
bikeways, lighting, and safe crossings,
forcing residents to rely heavily on
automobiles, even for short trips.

Collision data shows that while
pedestrian and bicyclist crashes
represent a small share of total crashes,
they account for a disproportionate
share of fatal and severe injuries.

Long travel distances, high speed
roadways, limited routing options,
and insufficient amenities further
discourage active transportation. These
challenges are greatest in communities
with higher proportions of low income
residents, older adults, people with
disabilities, and households without
reliable transportation options.
4 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Executive Summary | 5

Community Centered Planning
The YATC Plan was developed
through an extensive, equity focused
engagement process involving over 30
public events and multiple stakeholder
committees. Outreach emphasized
inclusivity—in person and online
engagement avenues were provided
for feedback collection, multilingual
materials were produced for use, and
meetings were strategically held at
times and key locations to ensure
broad reach of community members.

Community feedback consistently
highlighted the need for sidewalks, safe
crossings, traffic calming, lighting, and
comfortable access to communities,
schools, services, and transit.

Future Regional Active
Transportation Corridors
A network of intercommunity corridors
serves as the backbone of the planned
countywide active transportation
system. These corridors focus on
creating low stress, continuous
connections between unincorporated
communities, cities, employment
centers, schools, recreation areas,
and regional transit. The network
integrates shared-use paths along
waterways and levees with rail-
to-trail corridor opportunities and
side paths along county roads to
establish a bicycle superhighway
network designed to support
comfortable, long-distance bike travel,
serving the many intercommunity
trips made in Yolo County.

Due to limited availability of near-
term design funding, potential
intercommunity corridors were
evaluated for prioritization using
transparent, data driven criteria
centered on safety, connectivity, equity,
access to destinations, population
served, and project feasibility. High
priority corridors often parallel high
speed roadways or represent the only
feasible non motorized connections
between communities, such as the
segment between Madison and
Esparto along State Route 16.

Community Scale Improvements
In addition to regional corridors, the
Plan identifies targeted walking and
bicycling improvements within the
unincorporated communities: Esparto,
Madison, El Rio Villa, Yolo, Dunnigan,
Knights Landing, Clarksburg,
Zamora, Capay, Guinda, and Rumsey.

Recommendations include sidewalk
network gap closures, bike routes
and lanes, shared use paths, safer
crossings near schools and community
destinations, ADA upgrades, lighting,
and traffic calming. These projects
will enhance local accessibility
while connecting communities
with the regional network.

Implementation and Funding
Implementation will occur over
many years and require partnerships
among local agencies, incremental
construction of individual projects,
and pursuit of competitive funding.

The Plan positions Yolo County and
its partners to be more competitive
for state, regional, and federal
funding programs, such as the
Active Transportation Program
administered by Caltrans.

Fortunately, several segments within
the YATC network are advancing
forward, bringing the Plan’s vision
closer to reality. The Davis-Woodland
and Madison-Esparto segments
are undergoing design, concurrent
with YATC Plan development, but
will require subsequent pursuit
of funds to construct and bring
them closer to completion. The
Clarksburg Branch Line Trail extension
and I-505 Overcrossing projects,
which will provide meaningful
active transportation connections
between communities, are being
led by external sponsors and in
various stages of development.

Expected Outcomes
Successful implementation
of the YATC Plan will:
» Reduce pedestrian and bicyclist
crashes resulting in fatalities and
serious injuries
» Increase walking and bicycling for
daily trips and recreation
» Improve access to schools, services,
jobs, and transit
» Advance equity by prioritizing
underserved and disadvantaged
communities
» Support public health, climate, and
quality of life goals
The YATC Plan provides a roadmap
to transform the state of active
transportation in unincorporated Yolo
County, connecting people to places
more safely, comfortably, and equitably.
6 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Executive Summary | 7

01 The Yolo Active Transportation
Corridors (YATC) Plan prioritizes
improvements within Yolo County's
unincorporated communities while
recognizing the vital connections
between these areas and the
incorporated cities. Residents of
unincorporated communities often
depend on amenities, services, and
Remove travel
barriers for
low income
and minority
residents
Gather
community
input to
enhance travel
options for all
Create
connections
between cities
and within
unincorporated
Yolo County
communities
Goal 3. Goal 4. Goal 5.
employment opportunities located in
nearby cities. Likewise, city residents
and others from the broader region,
including Sacramento County, travel
to Yolo County’s unincorporated
areas for work, recreation, and other
purposes. Enhancing connectivity
between these communities will
improve access for all who live, work,
and travel throughout the county.

VISION &
GOALS
The Yolo Active Transportation
Corridors Plan envisions a safe,
connected, comfortable network of
trails, sidewalks, and bikeways that
serve the residents of Yolo County.

Improve
bicycling
and walking
connectivity,
access, and
safety
Expand the
countywide
trail system
Goal 1. Goal 2.

Specifically, this plan has been developed
to accomplish the following goals:
8 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Vision & Goals | 9

Numerous local, regional, and state planning documents establish goals and policies that inform active transportation and trails planning in Yolo County. A review of a comprehensive array of plans and policies related to transportation, infrastructure, and community health in Yolo County, discussed below, provides valuable insights into the strategic directions and priorities set forth by local governments and agencies. These documents create a planning framework to capture what efforts may already be in progress, relevant policies that guide active transportation investments and projects, and community values and interests.

Existing (adopted and in-progress) plans for active transportation infrastructure projects within Yolo County are either superseded by this plan, such as the 2013 Yolo Bicycle Transportation Plan, incorporated into this plan, left alone, or deferred to, as seen fit.

Relationship to Other
Plans and Policies
Local Jurisdictions
Some communities follow their own policies and requirements related to bicycling and walking, found in their community plans.

These are discussed in the chapter for each jurisdiction. The following documents encompass more than one community.

Capay Valley Area Community Plan
The Capay Valley Area Plan, as part of
the 2030 Yolo Countywide General Plan,
addresses the future of transportation
and circulation within the Capay
Valley, with a particular focus on
accommodating and enhancing bicycle
circulation. Recognizing the increasing
interest in bicycle use for both
recreation and as an alternative mode
of transportation, the plan outlines
policies and implementation measures
aimed at improving safety and
facilities for cyclists. This includes the
encouragement of bicycle traffic safety
education programs, the construction
of bicycle lanes wherever possible
or practical, and the support for the
addition of bicycle access and lanes
in any road improvement proposals
within the Capay Valley Planning
Area. These measures are in response
to the designation of State Route 16
as a scenic route and the popularity
of events like the Double Century
Bike Race, highlighting the need for
improved infrastructure to support
and encourage cycling in the region.

County of Yolo Bicycle Transportation Plan
The County of Yolo Bicycle
Transportation Plan aims to provide
a comprehensive, integrated system
of safe and convenient bikeway
facilities throughout the county, with
a focus on commuter bikeways over
recreational facilities. It proposes several
new high, medium, and low priority
projects, including an alternative
transportation corridor between Davis
and Woodland, bike lanes on various
county roads connecting the cities,
and extensions of existing shared-
use paths. The plan estimates 2,250
current daily bicycle commute trips in
the unincorporated county, projected
to grow to 3,700 by 2035. It outlines
policies for planning, implementing,
and maintaining bicycle facilities, and
describes coordination with other
local and regional transportation
plans. The county will pursue state,
federal, and regional funding sources
to construct the proposed bikeways,
while recognizing the importance
of ongoing maintenance.

Cache Creek Area Plan
The Cache Creek Area Plan primarily
focuses on managing aggregate
resources, water resources, floodway
and channel stability, agricultural
resources, biological resources, and
open space and recreation within the
Cache Creek area in Yolo County, which
is between the Capay Diversion Dam
and the town of Yolo, running through
the Capay Valley west of Woodland.

While the plan is not explicitly centered
on active transportation, it includes
elements that indirectly contribute
to the active transportation network.

The Open Space and Recreation
Element of the plan acknowledges the
potential for recreational areas along
Cache Creek to serve as nodes for non-
motorized activities such as hiking and
biking. The plan also recognizes the
importance of integrating recreational
facilities with the surrounding land
uses, which could enhance the active
transportation options available to
residents and visitors of Yolo County.
10 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Vision & Goals | 11

Cache Creek Parkway Plan
The Cache Creek Parkway Plan looks
to establish an integrated system of
trails and recreational areas along
Cache Creek, building on the existing
open space properties acquired
through the Cache Creek Area Plan.

The plan includes an inventory of
existing properties, a master plan
and vision for future trail connections
and recreational opportunities, and
feasibility studies examining the costs
and funding sources for different
levels of parkway development. The
plan is guided by relevant goals and
policies in the Yolo County General
Plan and the Cache Creek Area Plan,
which aim to increase public access
and recreational uses along the creek
while protecting habitat and ensuring
compatibility with surrounding land
uses. The parkway will provide a
range of passive and active recreation
opportunities for the community, from
hiking and birdwatching to boating
and fishing, while also preserving
and enhancing the creek's natural
resources. The plan identifies locations
for trailheads, staging areas, and
amenities like lookout points, picnic
areas, and boat launches to support
biking and walking activities. Specific
trail improvements are proposed,
such as ADA-accessible trails, bridge
crossings, and undercrossings, to
enhance connectivity and accessibility.

Overall, the Parkway Plan aims to
create a linear greenway with ample
opportunities for people to explore
Cache Creek by foot or by bike, while
also protecting the creek's natural
resources and habitat areas.

County of Yolo 2030 Countywide General Plan
The Yolo 2030 Countywide General
Plan Circulation Element is a strategic
framework designed to enhance the
transportation infrastructure across
Yolo County, with a focus on promoting
active transportation such as walking
and biking. The plan aims to create
a safe, efficient, and interconnected
network of roadways, bicycle paths, and
pedestrian facilities that cater to the
diverse mobility needs of the county's
residents. It emphasizes the integration
of land use and transportation
planning, the importance of
multimodal transportation options,
and the need for collaboration with
various stakeholders to implement
transportation projects effectively.

The Circulation Element also
addresses safety concerns, the
preservation of existing infrastructure,
and the equitable distribution of
transportation resources to serve
all communities within the county,
including underserved areas. The
plan's implementation is expected
to contribute to improved air
quality, public health, and overall
quality of life in Yolo County.

Yolo County Strategic Plan
The Yolo County Strategic Plan,
adopted for the period 2020-2025,
outlines a comprehensive vision for
the county's future, with a focus on
enhancing the quality of life for all
residents. While the plan encompasses
a broad range of goals, including
thriving residents, safe communities,
sustainable environment, flourishing
agriculture, and a robust economy,
it also implicitly supports the
development of active transportation
through its emphasis on safety,
sustainability, and community vitality.

Other Documents
The following documents were
reviewed to gain an understanding
of the demographic context and
needs of Yolo County residents.
» Yolo County Improvement Standards
» Yolo County Community Health
Needs Assessment 2022-2024
» Dignity Health Woodland Memorial
Hospital Community Health Needs
Assessment 2022
» Sutter Davis Hospital Community
Health Needs Assessment 2019
» I-80 Comprehensive Multimodal
Corridor Plan
» SACOG Next Generation Transit
Strategy
The following UC Davis and city-
specific documents contained relevant
information to be considered for
the regional connectors network.
» City of Davis Transportation
Implementation Plan
» City of Davis Street Design Standards
» City of Davis Beyond Platinum Bicycle
Action Plan
» City of Davis Local Roadway Safety
Plan
» City of Davis General Plan
» City of West Sacramento Mobility
Action Plan
» City of West Sacramento Bicycle,
Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan
» City of West Sacramento Street
Design Standards
» City of West Sacramento General Plan
» City of Winters Standard
Specifications
» City of Winters Bikeway System
Master Plan
» City of Winters General Plan
» City of Woodland Transportation
System Design Standards
» City of Woodland Bicycle
Transportation Plan
» City of Woodland General Plan
» UC Davis Institute of Transportation
Studies Campus Travel Survey
» UC Davis Bicycle & Transit Network
Study
» UC Davis Long Range Development
Plan
The YATC Plan aims to strengthen
connections to the incorporated
communities by recommending
facilities that connect to the active
transportation facilities located at
the edge of cities, where possible.
12 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Vision & Goals | 13

Caltrans District 3 Active Transportation Plan
The Caltrans District 3 Active
Transportation Plan identifies and
prioritizes pedestrian and bicycle
infrastructure needs on the State
Highway System in 11 counties in
Northern California, with the goal of
increasing safety, mobility, equity,
and preservation for people walking
and biking. The plan found that
common needs include sidewalk gaps,
poor sidewalk conditions, stressful
pedestrian and bicycle crossings, and
infrequent highway crossings, with
the highest priority needs designated
as Tier 1. Over 2,400 public comments
were received, with concerns about
heavy traffic, lack of bike lanes, and
difficult highway crossings. One-
third of the state highway system in
District 3 passes through underserved
communities, which was a key
consideration in the prioritization
process. Caltrans will leverage local
partnerships to identify and initiate
projects to address the prioritized
needs, seeking funding through
programs like the State Highway
Operation and Protection Program and
the Active Transportation Program.

SACOG 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/
Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS)
The SACOG 2025 Blueprint is
the Sacramento Area Council
of Governments’ (SACOG) long-
range regional plan that integrates
transportation, housing, land use, and
environmental strategies to guide
growth in the six-county Sacramento
region. It aims to create a connected,
equitable, and sustainable region by
prioritizing sustainable transportation
options, affordable housing, and
investments that promote economic
opportunity and environmental
stewardship. The plan focuses on
infill development, revitalizing key
corridors, and reducing greenhouse
gas emissions in compliance with state
mandates. Built on extensive public
engagement, the Blueprint uses a
“Triple Bottom Line” framework—
equity, economy, and environment—
to ensure balanced growth while
maintaining infrastructure,
improving safety, and fostering
resilience against climate impacts.

The 2025 Blueprint places an
emphasis on building a more multi-
modal transportation system by
expanding and improving bicycle
and pedestrian infrastructure. The
plan calls for significant investments
in new bike lanes, trails, and other
facilities and programs to create a
more connected and accessible active
transportation network. The YATC trail
network will integrate into the SACOG
Sacramento Regional Trail Network,
supporting greater non-vehicle access
to destinations within the region.

SACOG Sacramento Region Parks and Trails
Strategic Development Plan
The SACOG Sacramento Region Parks
and Trails Strategic Development
Plan aims to develop a strategic vision
and framework for expanding the
regional parks and trails network in
the Sacramento area. It examines
existing trail access, finding that
540,000 households and 660,200 jobs
do not have access to trails 0.5 miles
or longer, with only 35 percent of
disadvantaged residents able to access
these trails compared to 45 percent
of non-disadvantaged residents. The
plan highlights changing conditions
like increased funding for marginalized
communities and growing interest
in all-ages, all-abilities trail networks.

It also reviews local goals around
environmental justice, safety, economic
vitality, and health, as well as prioritized
destinations like parks, employment
centers, and transit. Key findings from
partner meetings include aspirations
to meet current crises, the multi-
faceted benefits of economic vitality
from trails, and challenges around
engaging marginalized communities
and overcoming institutional barriers
like coordination with Union Pacific.

Great Delta California Delta Trail Blueprint Report
for Contra Costa and Solano Counties
The Great California Delta Trail is
envisioned as a continuous recreational
corridor through the five California
Delta counties, linking the San
Francisco Bay Trail system to the
planned Sacramento River trails and
including water trails. The master plan
was developed through public and
stakeholder engagement and proposes
four trail designation types: a main
trail corridor, local access trails, water
launch sites, and adventure hubs. The
plan divides the Delta into four regions
and provides recommendations for
each, focusing on supporting existing
trails, exploring new connections,
and designating key segments
as part of the overall Delta Trail
network. Successful implementation
will require coordination between
many agencies and partners, and
funding from diverse sources
will be critical at all stages, from
planning and design to construction,
operations, and promotion.

Yolo County is part of the Northern
Region of the Delta Trail plan. This
region is the gateway to the Delta from
Sacramento and West Sacramento
along the Sacramento River Parkway.

The plan highlights opportunities to
promote existing dedicated Delta
Trail segments in Yolo County, such
as the Clarksburg Branch Line Trail,
and support closing gaps in the trail
network . The plan also recommends
supporting local planning efforts to
study the feasibility of the Isleton-
Stone Lake Trail, which would
connect Freeport, Hood, Locke, and
Walnut Grove and pass through
Delta Meadows State Park. Overall,
Yolo County is seen as an important
part of the Northern Region for
expanding the Delta Trail network
and connecting it to the broader
Sacramento River trail system.

Regional
The following regional plans were also important
in the development of the YATC Plan:
14 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Vision & Goals | 15

California Transportation Plan 2040
The California Transportation Plan 2040
sets forth a vision for a sustainable,
multimodal transportation system
that addresses the needs of all
Californians. The plan emphasizes the
importance of improving multimodal
mobility and accessibility, with specific
goals to expand engagement in
multimodal transportation planning
and decision-making. It highlights the
need for integrated transportation
and land use development, which
includes enhancing pedestrian
and bicycle networks. The plan
also underscores the significance
of reducing greenhouse gas
emissions and other air pollutants,
which aligns with promoting active
transportation modes like bicycling
and walking. Although the document
is a statewide plan, its policies and
recommendations are relevant to
Yolo County's efforts to improve its
active transportation infrastructure.

Toward an Active California: State Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Toward an Active California is
Caltrans' first statewide plan for active
transportation modes like walking
and bicycling. The plan sets a vision
that by 2040, people in California of all
ages, abilities, and incomes can safely,
conveniently, and comfortably walk
and bicycle for their transportation
needs. The plan outlines four key
objectives and 15 strategies to achieve
them: 1) Safety - Reduce bicycle and
pedestrian collisions, 2) Mobility -
Increase walking and bicycling, 3)
Preservation - Maintain high quality
active transportation infrastructure,
and 4) Social Equity - Invest resources
in disadvantaged communities.

The plan emphasizes the need for
partnerships and collaboration
across state, regional, and local
agencies to successfully implement
the strategies, and highlights the
significant new funding from the
Road Repair and Accountability Act of
2017 that will be critical to supporting
the plan's implementation.

California Assembly Bill 954
California Assembly Bill 954 (AB 954)
aims to promote long-distance bicycle
travel by directing the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
to explore the development of “bicycle
highways.” These highways would
be part of the state’s Interregional
Transportation Strategic Plan and
designed specifically for cyclists,
featuring numbered and signed routes
that allow for higher-speed travel (up to
25 mph) over longer distances (typically
five miles or more). The bill mandates
Caltrans to prepare a proposal for a pilot
program in two major metropolitan
areas, with the goal of integrating these
bike highways into the state’s broader
transportation network. The proposal
must be included in the Interregional
Transportation Improvement
Program by January 1, 2030, and a
report on the pilot’s progress and
recommendations for expansion is
due by July 1, 2031. AB 954 is set to
become inoperative on July 1, 2035,
and will be repealed on January 1, 2036,
unless extended by future legislation.

State and Federal
Several state and federal plans and other documents contain goals, policies, and requirements relevant to the ATP, as listed below.
16 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Vision & Goals | 17

02 EXISTING

CONDITIONS
An assessment of existing active
transportation conditions in Yolo
County provides a foundational
understanding of how the current
bicycle and pedestrian networks
function and who they serve. This
includes an inventory and analysis of
existing facilities, including bikeways,
trails, sidewalks, and crossings—as
well as patterns of usage across
different communities. Evaluating the
connectivity, safety, and accessibility
of these networks helps identify gaps
and opportunities for improvement.

Additionally, understanding the
socioeconomic characteristics of
potential users, such as age, income,
vehicle access, and disadvantaged
community status ensures that
planning efforts are equitable and
responsive to those who rely most on
walking and biking. The assessment
provides critical context for developing
strategies that enhance mobility, safety,
and access for Yolo County residents.

This chapter describes
the current state of active
transportation facilities and
usage within Yolo County. The
existing bicycle and pedestrian
networks are presented
along with a description of
the socioeconomic and land
use context of potential
users of the network, in
addition to other factors.
18 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 19

Yolo County Overview
Yolo County is defined by a combination
of urban, suburban, agricultural,
and recreational lands.

Socioeconomic
Background
Yolo County has a total estimated
population of 216,400. The following
summarizes the socioeconomic
background of residents on a
county-wide level, as informed by
the United States Census Bureau
American Community Survey 2021
(ACS 2017-2021 5-year Estimates).

The topography of Yolo County is generally flat with the exception of the Blue Ridge Mountains, Capay Hills, and Dunnigan Hills in the western portion of the county. The Blue Ridge Mountains and Capay Hills form the Capay Valley, which is home to several communities including Rumsey, Guinda, Brooks, and Capay. Several prominent waterways traverse Yolo County, including Cache Creek, Putah Creek, the Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, and the Sacramento River, the last of which forms the eastern boundary of the county. Additional waterways and flood control features include the Yolo Bypass and numerous irrigation channels that serve Yolo County farmland.

The median age of residents in cities of
Yolo County ranges between 35 to 37 years
which is comparable to the statewide and
countywide median age. Davis is an exception
with a median age of 26 years. However,
the population in the unincorporated areas
is considerably older in comparison to the
statewide and countywide median age, barring
a few exceptions like Esparto and Guinda.
35- 37 YEARS OLD
AGE

CHARACTERISTICS
The share of surveyed population with
disabilities is significantly higher than the
statewide share (11%) in most unincorporated
communities including Dunnigan (31%),
Madison (29%), Guinda (27%), Rumsey (21%,
Knights Landing (18%), and El Macero (15%).

HIGHER THAN COUNTY &

STATEWIDE SHARE

PERSONS WITH

DISABILITY
The majority of Yolo County communities,
including most unincorporated communities,
have very low percentages of residents below
the poverty line relative to the statewide
average (12 percent). Davis (26 percent),
Guinda (54 percent), Knights Landing
(20 percent), and Madison (16 percent)
have relatively high shares of residents
with income below the poverty line.

POVERTY STATUS
Median household income for Yolo County
residents is $78,386, 7 percent less than
the statewide median household income
of $84,097. While data is limited, several
unincorporated Yolo County communities
exhibit relatively low median household
incomes. Available data for unincorporated
communities indicates that the median
household income of Dunnigan, Knights
Landing and Madison are 49 percent, 48
percent, and 51 percent, respectively, of
the statewide median household income.
$78,386 | 7% LESS

THAN STATEWIDE

MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD
INCOME
Approximately 45 percent of Yolo County
residents are white compared to 36 percent
statewide. Esparto (44 percent), Knights
Landing (84 percent), Madison (95 percent)
and Yolo CDP (68 percent) are observed
to have high shares of Hispanic or Latino
population in comparison to the county
(32 percent) and state (40 percent).

RACE AND ETHNICITY

CHARACTERISTICS
20 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 21

The share of households with zero vehicles
in Yolo County cities ranges between
five to nine percent compared to an
eight percent share in the county and a
seven percent share statewide. Vehicle
ownership levels are relatively high in
unincorporated Yolo County communities.

Three percent of households in Esparto and
three percent of households in Monument
Hills do not have a vehicle, while all
households in other unincorporated
communities have at least one vehicle.

Higher levels of vehicle ownership are
likely due to the lack of transportation
options and longer travel distances for
unincorporated Yolo County communities.
5-9% | HIGHER THAN COUNTY
& STATEWIDE SHARE

VEHICLE OWNERSHIP
Most of the working population in the
county are employed by the educational
services, health care and social assistance
industry (29 percent), followed by the
professional, scientific and management
industry (11 percent) and the arts and
entertainment industry (11 percent). In
the cities of Yolo County, the overall trends
across industries are comparable to the
countywide data. In the unincorporated
communities, however, a broader
distribution of the working population
occurs across different industries. A
significantly higher share of population
relative to the countywide data are
working in the Agriculture (Dunnigan-
31 percent; Esparto- 16 percent),
Construction (Madison- 24 percent;
Yolo- 21 percent), Manufacturing (Knights
Landing- 23 percent), and Retail industries
(Clarksburg- 21 percent; Madison- 27
percent; Rumsey- 29 percent).

WORKING POPULATION
BY INDUSTRY TYPES Unemployment in the county is highest in Clarksburg (25 percent) and Knights
Landing (26 percent). The statewide
average is sex percent, and all other
unincorporated communities in the
county have an unemployment rate of
4 percent or lower. At the county level,
39 percent of residents are not included
in the labor force. Most unincorporated
communities have a relatively higher
share in this regard. Among them,
Guinda (87 percent), Madison (72
percent) and Tancred (89 percent)
have the highest share of residents
not included in the labor force.

EMPLOYMENT STATUS
The majority of Yolo County commute trips
are completed by car. Over 85 percent
of residents countywide use a car, truck,
or van for commuting, compared to 77
percent statewide. The share of commute
trips completed by car is even higher
for unincorporated communities at 97
percent. The average commute time to
work is around 30 minutes or less in all
communities, comparable to the statewide
average (also approximately 30 minutes).

Shorter car commute times of less than
10 minutes account for 15 percent of all
commute travel. These trips could be
short enough to be completed by bicycle.

COMMUTER CHARACTERISTICS

OF POPULATION

MAJORITY TRIPS BY CAR
22 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 23

Origins-Destinations
An origin–destination (O- D) analysis was conducted to understand where Yolo County residents travel and where those trips originate and end. StreetLight data was used to estimate daily vehicle trips made between communities during spring 2023. The analysis summarizes the number of trips generated by each community and their corresponding destination communities. O-D analysis sheds light on overall travel patterns, helping identify and prioritize locations for future active transportation facilities. The following presents the top 20 origin–destination pairs among Yolo County residents, ranked by the number of trips made between the communities and followed by the share of total trips made. Together, these 20 pairs represent 85% of the total vehicle trips that start and end within Yolo County.

1. UC Davis – Davis, 21%

2. Davis – Woodland, 20%

3. Woodland – West Sacramento, 5%

4. Davis – Dixon, 5%

5. Davis – West Sacramento, 5%

6. Dixon – Woodland, 4%

7. Woodland – UC Davis, 3%

8. Wild Wings – Woodland, 3%

9. El Macero – Davis, 3%

10. Woodland – Esparto, 2%

11. Monument Hills – Woodland, 2%

12. Woodland – Knights Landing, 2%

13. Woodland – Yolo, 2%

14. Davis – Winters, 2%

15. Woodland – Winters, 1%

16. Woodland – Cache Creek Casino, 1%

17. Dixon – West Sacramento, 1%

18. Woodland – Dunnigan, 1%

19. Winters – Dixon, 1%

20. Dixon – UC Davis, 1%
:LQWHUV
'DYLV
:HVW
6DFUDPHQWR
:RRGODQG
*XLQGD
&DSD\
0DGLVRQ
=DPRUD
<ROR
.QLJKWV
/DQGLQJ
&ODUNVEXUJ
'XQQLJDQ
(VSDUWR :LOG:LQJV
5XPVH\
%URRNV
(O0DFHUR
0RQXPHQW
+LOOV
7DQFUHG
(O5LR
9LOOD
$LUEXV86*61*$1$6$&*,$51&($61/62610$*HRGDWDVW\UHOVHQ*6$*6, DQGWKH*,68VHU&RPPXQLW\
UC DavisUC Davis
DixonDixon
Cache Creek CasinoCache Creek Casino
24 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 25

Disadvantaged Communities
The identification of disadvantaged and underserved
communities is a key metric in many grant funding
programs such as California’s Active Transportation
Program. This plan presents six different indicators
of disadvantaged communities, often referred
to as environmental justice communities.
2017- 2021 AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY
Five-year estimates of Median household income and Zero vehicle Households from the American Community Survey were utilized to inform the analysis (Figure 1).

Wi n ters
D a vi s
West
Sa cra m en to
Woodland
Guinda
Capay
M adison
Zamora
Yo l o
Knight s
Landing
Cl arksbu rg
Dunnigan
E spa r to
Wil d Win gs
Ru m sey
Brooks
E l M a c e r o
M onument
Hills
Ta n cr ed
El Rio V illa
M edian H ousehold I ncome
Figure 8
505
5 16
80 113
84 90
128
113
45 D i xon
V ac av ille
Sa cra m en to
<40%
Median Household Income by Census Tract (2021)
>120%
80% - 120%
40% - 80%
Data Source:
2017-2021 American Community
Survey (ACS) 5-year detailed table of
US Census Bureau
Figure 1: Median Household Income
Many areas covered by this plan have one or more indicators of disadvantaged community status. Figures 1 through 6
display the areas within the region that meet each criterion. 26 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 27

FREE & REDUCED-PRICE MEAL PROGRAM
The National School Lunch Program is a federally funded initiative that assists schools and other agencies in providing nutritious lunches for free or at reduced prices to students meeting the income eligibility criteria. In California, the Department of Education administers the program and publishes yearly Free and Reduced-Price Meals data which was utilized for the analysis (Figure 3).

CALENVIROSCREEN
California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen) is a mapping tool developed by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) to identify communities that are disproportionately burdened by multiple sources of pollution (Figure 2).

Wi n ters
D a vi s
West
Sa cra m en to
Woodland
Guinda
Capay
M adison
Zamora
Yo l o
Knight s
Landing
Cl arksbu rg
Dunnigan
E spa r to
Wil d Win gs
Ru m sey
Brooks
E l M a c e r o
M onument
Hills
Ta n cr ed
El Rio V illa
Free and Reduced Price M eals
Figure 10
505
5 16
80 113
84 90
128
113
45 D i xon
V ac av ille
Sa cra m en to
Percent Eligible for Free or Reduced Price Meals
> 75%
51% - 75%
26% - 50%
< 25%
Data Source:

The California Department of
Education (CDE) certified in the
California Longitudinal pupil
Achievement Data System
(CALPADS)
Wi n ters
D a vi s
West
Sa cra m en to
Woodland
Guinda
Capay
M adison
Zamora
Yo l o
Knight s
Landing
Cl arksbu rg
Dunnigan
E spa r to
Wil d Win gs
Ru m sey
Brooks
E l M a c e r o
M onument
Hills
Ta n cr ed
El Rio V illa
CalEnviroScreen
Figure 9
7060
CalEnviroscreen 4.0
Overall Percentile
80 90 100
Lowest
Score
Highest
Score
3020 40 500 10
505
5 16
80 113
84 90
128
113
45 D i xon
V ac av ille
Sa cra m en to
Data Source:

California Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment,
CalEnviroScreen 4.0
Figure 2: CalEnviroScreen Figure 3: Free and Reduced Price Meals 28 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 29

Wi n ters
D a vi s
West
Sa cra m en to
Woodland
Guinda
Capay
M adison
Zamora
Yo l o
Knight s
Landing
Cl arksbu rg
Dunnigan
E spa r to
Wil d Win gs
Ru m sey
Brooks
E l M a c e r o
M onument
Hills
Ta n cr ed
El Rio V illa
S A C O G E n v i r o n m e n t a l J u s t i c e A r e a s Figure 12
505
5 16
80 113
84 90
128
113
45 D i xon
V ac av ille
Sa cra m en to
Identified as Disadvantaged
Not Identified as Disadvantaged

SACOG ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AREAS
This tool developed by Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) helps identify Environmental Justice communities based on income, minority, qualification, and “other vulnerability” at a census block group level. Other vulnerability here includes older adults aged 75 or more, linguistically isolated households, single- parent households with children under the age of 18, low educational attainment, severely housing cost burdened households, and persons with disabilities (Figure 5).

Wi n ters
D a vi s
West
Sa cra m en to
Woodland
Guinda
Capay
M adison
Zamora
Yo l o
Knight s
Landing
Cl arksbu rg
Dunnigan
E spa r to
Wil d Win gs
Ru m sey
Brooks
E l M a c e r o
M onument
Hills
Ta n cr ed
El Rio V illa
Calif ornia Healthy Places Index
Figure 11
505
5 16
80 113
84 90
128
113
45 D i xon
V ac av ille
Sa cra m en to
25 0
50 75
100
Less
Healthy
Healthy Community Conditions via Percentile Ranking
More
Healthy

HEALTHY PLACES INDEX
The Healthy Places Index is a tool developed by the Public Health Alliance of Southern California that estimates a composite score for each census tract in the state where a higher score is indicative of healthier community conditions based on 25 community characteristics that can be broadly categorized as Economic, Education, Social, Transportation, Neighborhood, Housing, Clean Environment, and Healthcare Access. The scores are then converted to a percentile to compare them to other tracts in the state (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Healthy Places Index Figure 5: SACOG Environmental Justice Areas 30 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 31

Transportation System
The county is served by a multi-modal transportation
system of highways, roads, transit routes, railways,
airports, bike lanes and paths, and sidewalks that
facilitate the movement of people and goods.

Outside of the incorporated areas, the unincorporated Yolo County transportation system is primarily rural in character, serving small communities and agricultural uses through a system of county roads, private roads, freeways, and highways. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) owns, operates, and maintains the State Highway System facilities that serve Yolo County, including I-5, I-80, I-505, SR 16, SR 45, SR 84, SR 113, and SR 128.

Caltrans facilities are an integral component of the active transportation system throughout the county, serving as main streets in several Yolo County communities, providing access to destinations people visit every day, and connecting communities together. Figures 2.7.0 through 2.7.9, included in Appenidx B, display the county’s roadway network by functional classification.

Transportation planning, operations, and maintenance within Yolo County is the responsibility of each individual jurisdiction that owns and operates their respective transportation facilities, including Yolo County, the cities of Davis, West Sacramento, Winters, and Woodland, and UC Davis. Each of these local jurisdictions has developed an active transportation (or similar) plan that identifies improvements to their respective active transportations systems.

YoloTD and SACOG lead regional transportation planning, and for SACOG, funding, in Yolo County. SACOG recently prepared the Sacramento Region Trail Network Action Plan to identify and prioritize trails improvements throughout the six-county SACOG region, including Yolo County. The YATC plan builds on the regional planning effort by advancing project planning in greater detail in Yolo County, leading to constructable projects.

FEDERAL CLIMATE AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE SCREENING TOOL
This tool was launched by the White House Council to support the Justice40 initiative, which seeks to deliver 40 percent of the overall benefits of Federal climate, clean energy, affordable and sustainable housing, clean water, and other investments to disadvantaged communities that are marginalized, underserved, and overburdened by pollution. This tool considers eight categories of burdens that include Climate Change, Energy, Health, Housing, Legacy Pollution, Transportation, Waste and Wastewater, and Workforce Development (Figure 6).

Wi n ters
D a vi s
West
Sa cra m en to
Woodland
Guinda
Capay
M adison
Zamora
Yo l o
Knight s
Landing
Cl arksbu rg
Dunnigan
E spa r to
Wil d Win gs
Ru m sey
Brooks
E l M a c e r o
M onument
Hills
Ta n cr ed
El Rio V illa
C l i m a t e a n d E c o n o m i c J u s t i c e
Disadv antaged A reas
Figure 13
505
5 16
80 113
84 90
128
113
45 D i xon
V ac av ille
Sa cra m en to
Disadvantaged Census Tracts
Census Tract Not Identified as Disadvantaged
Data Source:

Council of Environmental Quality,
Climate and Economic Justice
Screening Tool
Figure 6: Federal Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool 32 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 33

Transit
Yolo County is served by a variety of bus and rail transit services.

YoloTD operates local, intercity, and commuter bus, microtransit, and paratransit service between Yolo County communities and to/from Downtown Sacramento. Unitrans and Davis Community Transit operate local fixed-route and paratransit bus service, respectively, within the City of Davis and the UC Davis campus.

The City of West Sacramento operates microtransit service within its city limits. Amtrak operates passenger train and intercity bus service with connections at the Davis Amtrak Station in Downtown Davis. Amtrak services available in Davis include the Capitol Corridor, the Coast Starlight, and the California Zephyr rail lines and Thruway intercity bus services to Sacramento and Stockton.

Figure 7 shows the regional transit facilities serving Yolo County.

While the YATC Plan does not address service or operation changes to existing transit service, it recognizes the importance of pedestrian and bicycle connections with transit stops and hubs to improve mobility and access throughout the county. Throughout 2024, 2025, and 2026, YoloTD and the City of Davis (in partnership with Unitrans) will update their respective Short Range Transit Plans.

Figure 7: Regional Transit Service
34 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 35

Mode Share
The American Community Survey collects statistics on the modes of transportation for the employed population 16 years and over who do not work from home. Table 1, included in Appendix B, summarizes the estimated number of existing bicycle trips and pedestrian trips in the plan area in both absolute numbers and as a percentage of all trips.

Overall, 2.5 percent of Yolo County walked to their place of employment and

8.3 percent relied on bicycle, motorcycle, taxicab, or some other means. Over four percent use public transportation and 85.1 percent commute by car, truck, or van. Compared to the county as whole, the community of Dunnigan has a greater share of residents that walk to get to work—about 6.1 percent. Similarly, Clarksburg seems to have a greater share of residents that bike to work, with 14.3 percent of its population using bicycle, motorcycle, taxicab, or some other means.

Barriers to Active Transportation
Several barriers stand in the way of active transportation in Yolo County, leaving bicyclists and pedestrians vulnerable to harm or rendering the implementation of active transportation much less feasible, as explained below.

Long Travel Distances:

The wide geographic distribution of Yolo County communities creates substantial travel distances between them. Many of these longer trips cannot reasonably be completed by walking or bicycling, except for the most confident and experienced bicyclists who are more willing to travel for longer distances.

Limited Routing Options:

The agricultural land use pattern of Yolo County results in a roadway network with wide spacing between roads and
intersections. Moreover, features such as the Yolo Bypass and the Capay Hills and Blue Ridge Mountains that form the Capay Valley limit opportunities for connections in some parts of Yolo County. These factors create limited routing options for longer-distance active transportation routes and for connections serving unincorporated communities.

Roadway Constraints:

Many county roads are relatively narrow, lack shoulders, and have roadside uses such as irrigation channels, drainage ditches, and utility lines. These factors limit opportunities to widen many Yolo County roads to accommodate
space and facilities for active transportation.

Climate:

Although much of Yolo County is flat and the relatively dry climate is conducive to bicycling and walking, other local environmental conditions make active transportation more challenging. Summers are hot, with temperatures reaching the 90s to low 100s degrees Fahrenheit during their peak in July and August. Flooding is a concern in some communities such as Guinda and Dunnigan.

90.0% Car, Truck, or Van

4.6% Public Transportation

2.7% Taxicab, motorcycle,
bicycle, or other

2.7% Walk
Figure 8: How People in Yolo County Travel to Work
36 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 37

Existing Active Transportation Facilities
Outside of cities and unincorporated communities, county roads and state highways in Yolo County generally lack pedestrian facilities. Exceptions include the shared-use paths on Russell Boulevard west of Davis and on the I-80 causeway between Davis and West Sacramento. The presence of pedestrian facilities varies substantially across each unincorporated Yolo County community. Where provided, most existing sidewalks and crosswalks in unincorporated communities exist near schools and local activity centers. Some unincorporated communities such as Esparto, Knights Landing, and Clarksburg have more extensive sidewalk networks, whereas other unincorporated communities lack pedestrian facilities altogether. Bicycle parking is also limited, with racks for short-term use provided at some schools and libraries.

Within unincorporated Yolo County, existing bikeway facilities are very limited. Most unincorporated communities entirely lack designated bikeway facilities, with the following exceptions:

El Rio Villa: bike lanes are present on Russell Boulevard along the northern frontage of the community, connecting El Rio Villa to Winters to the west and Davis to the east.

Esparto: SR 16 (Yolo Avenue) has bike lanes in both directions on Yolo Avenue between Woodland Avenue and Plainfield Street. Recent improvements to the bike lanes include green bike lane pavement markings and enhanced signage.

Figures 9 through 24 display existing active transportation facilities within the unincorporated communities and region, in alphabetical order.

Wi n ters
D a vi s
West
Sa cra m en to
Woodland
Guinda
Capay
M adison
Zamora
Yo l o
Knight s
Landing
Cl arksbu rg
Dunnigan
E spa r to
Wil d Win gs
Ru m sey
Brooks
E l M a c e r o
M onument
Hills
Ta n cr ed
El Rio V illa
Existing Regional Bicy cle N etwork
Figure 2
505
5 16
80 113
84 90
128
113
45 D i xon
V ac av ille
Sa cra m en to
Class IV Separated Bikeway
Class III Bicycle Route
Class II Bicycle Lane
Class I Bicycle Path
Figure 9: Existing Regional Bicycle Network
Bicycle Path
Bicycle Lane
Separated Bikeway
Bicycle Route
38 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 39

Figure 10: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: Brooks Figure 11: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: Capay Brooks Capay
40 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 41

Figure 12: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: Clarksburg Figure 13: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: Dunnigan Clarksburg Dunnigan
42 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 43

Figure 14: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: El Macero Figure 15: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: El Rio Villa El Macero
El Rio Villa
44 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 45

Figure 16: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: Esparto Figure 17: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: Guinda Esparto Guinda
46 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 47

Figure 18: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: Knights Landing Figure 19: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: Madison Knights
Landing
Madison
48 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 49

Figure 20: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: Monument Hills Figure 21: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: Rumsey Monument
Hills
Rumsey
50 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 51

Figure 22: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: Tancred Figure 23: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: Yolo Tancred Guinda
52 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 53

Figure 24: Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities: Zamora
Zamora
54 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 55

Figure 25: Agritourism Destinations in Yolo County
Agritourism
Agriculture is a primary driver of the Yolo County economy. In addition to operating working farms, dozens of businesses throughout Yolo County sell products, lease event venues, and offer tours, dining, and lodging. Altogether, these businesses support a burgeoning agritourism industry in Yolo County, attracting visitors from throughout Northern California and beyond.

The YATC Plan presents an opportunity to support economic development in Yolo County by providing safe, convenient, and comfortable active transportation connections between agritourism destinations (Figure 25).

Similar successful cycling and hiking tourism models are prevalent in Europe, allowing visitors to use active modes to travel between nearby agritourism destinations and cultivating synergies between these businesses. 56 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 57

Table 3: KSI Collisions Involving Pedestrians and Bicyclists, 2018-2022 Year Total
Collisions
in All
Modes
Collisions
involving
Pedestrians
Share of
Collisions
involving
Pedestrians
Collisions
involving
Bicyclists
Share of
Collisions
involving
Bicyclists
2018 64 3* 4.7% 1 1.6%
2019 55 4* 7. 3% 1 1.8%
2020 59 3* 5.1% 2* 3.4%
2021 88 4* 4.5% 3 3.4%
2022 76 3* 3.9% 1 1.3%
Total 342 17 5.0% 8 2.3%
*Includes Fatalities
Sources: SWITRS 2023, TIMS 2023, Fehr & Peers 2023
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Collisions Involving Bicyclists and Pedestrians
Total Bike Total Ped KSI Bike KSI Ped
Figure 26: Collisions Involving Bicyclists and Pedestrians, 2018 - 2022 Safety
Collision History
In unincorporated Yolo County, a total of 1,652 collisions were reported between 2018 and 2022, the most recent five years for which completed data was available at the time of analysis. Of these collisions, 26 involved a pedestrian and 18 involved a bicyclist.

The number and share of collisions involving pedestrians and bicyclists, including Killed or Severely Injured (KSI) crashes, and their variation across time is summarized in Table 2 and Table 3.

Bicyclists and pedestrians are more susceptible to severe injury and death in the event of collisions, making them vulnerable roadway users. Although collisions involving people walking or biking make up less than 3 percent of all collisions, they account for over 7 percent of the collisions that result in a KSI outcome. One bicyclist fatality and nine pedestrian fatalities occurred between 2018 and 2022.

Table 2: Collisions Involving Pedestrians and Bicyclists, 2018-2022 Year Total
Collisions
in All
Modes
Collisions
involving
Pedestrians
Share of
Collisions
involving
Pedestrians
Collisions
involving
Bicyclists
Share of
Collisions
involving
Bicyclists
2018 359 5 1.4% 2 0.6%
2019 305 6 2.0% 3 1.0%
2020 278 5 1.8% 6 2.2%
2021 351 4 1.1% 4 1.1%
2022 359 6 1.7% 3 0.8%
Total 1652 26 1.6% 18 1.1%
Sources: SWITRS 2023, TIMS 2023, Fehr & Peers 2023
58 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 59

44.4%

16.7%

11.1%

5.6% 5.6% 5.6%

11.1%
0 2
4 6
8 10
Improper
Turning
Other Than
Driver (or
Pedestrian)
Traffic
Signals and
Signs
Vehicle R/W
Violation
Wrong Side
of Road
Improper
Passing
Unknown
Primary Collision Factor for Collisions Involving Bicyclists 2018-2022
Sources: SWITRS 2023, TIMS 2023, Fehr & Peers 2023
» Location of Pedestrian and Bicycle Collisions
This section summarizes the locations and lighting conditions of collisions involving a pedestrian or bicyclist.

Table 4 shows the reported roadway location of collisions. The largest share of pedestrian collisions, over 88 percent, occurred while the pedestrian was in the roadway, which is consistent with the lack of formal sidewalk and pedestrian infrastructure in most of unincorporated Yolo County. Nearly 4 percent of pedestrian collisions occurred at an intersection while the pedestrian was crossing in a crosswalk. A lack of streetlights was also noted in 62 percent of total pedestrian collisions as shown in Table 5, highlighting the need for potential investments in additional lighting on roads and sidewalks.

Table 4: Locations of Collisions Involving Pedestrians, 2018-2022 Location Number Share
Crossing In Crosswalk at Intersection 1 3.8%
Crossing Not in Crosswalk 1 3.8%
In Road 23 88.5%
Not in Road 1 3.8%
Total 26 100%
Sources: SWITRS 2023, TIMS 2023, Fehr & Peers 2023
Figure 28: Collisions Involving Bicyclists: Primary Collision Factors » Primary Collision Factor
Primary Collision Factor (PCF) is a term that refers to one element or driving action which in the investigating officer’s opinion best describes the primary or main cause of the collision—for example, driving or bicycling under the influence, unsafe speed, improper turning, and unsafe lane change.

The PCFs for collisions involving people walking and biking are shown below.

As shown in Figure 27, around 38 percent of collisions involving pedestrians had a PCF of pedestrian violation. Other collisions (62 percent) were the fault of the driver primarily due to improper turnings or unsafe driving speeds. As shown in Figure 28, for collisions involving bicyclists, many PCFs (over 72 percent) were either the fault of the bicyclist or driver, as bicycles are generally treated as motor vehicles, so the fault is not directly clear from the stated PCF. However, around 44 percent of the total collisions were related to improper turning while another 6 percent were related to riding on the wrong side of the road.

As mentioned above, pedestrian violation and riding on the wrong side of the road PCFs could indicate that a pedestrian or bicyclist was the at- fault party in a collision. However, great caution should be used when evaluating faults for collisions involving pedestrians and bicyclists. Lack of infrastructure for walking and biking may cause pedestrians and bicyclists to make behaviors which may seem unsafe, such as crossing away from a crosswalk, rather than travel longer distances to access crosswalks.

38.5%

15.4% 15.4% 15.4%

3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8%
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 Pedestrian
Violation
Unsafe
Speed
Improper
Turning
Other Than
Driver (or
Pedestrian)
Driving or
Biking
Under
Influence
Unsafe
Starting or
Backing
Pedestrian
R/W
Violation
Unsafe Lane
Change
Primary Collision Factor for Collisions Involving Pedestrian 2018-2022
Sources: SWITRS 2023, TIMS 2023, Fehr & Peers 2023
Figure 27: Collisions Involving Bicyclists and Pedestrians: Primary Collision Factors 60 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 61

Wi n ters
D a vi s
West
Sa cra m en to
Woodland
Guinda
Capay
M adison
Zamora
Yo l o
Knight s
Landing
Cl arksbu rg
Dunnigan
E spa r to
Wil d Win gs
Ru m sey
Brooks
E l M a c e r o
M onument
Hills
Ta n cr ed
El Rio V illa
Collisions inv olving Pedestrians
Figure 6
505
5 16
80 113
84 90
128
113
45 D i xon
V ac av ille
Sa cra m en to
All Other Collisions
Killed or Severely Injured Collision
Data Source:

Transportation Injury Mapping
System (TIMS), Safe Transportation
Research and Education Center,
University of California, Berkeley.

Figure 29: Collisions Involving Pedestrians
Table 5: Lighting Conditions at Collision Locations Involving Pedestrians and Bicyclists, 2018-2022
Lighting Pedestrian
Collisions
Share of
Pedestrian
Collisions
Bicyclist
Collisions
Share of
Bicyclist
Collisions
Daylight 9 35% 14 78%
Dusk - Dawn 1 4% 0 0%
Dark - No Street
Lights 16 62% 4 22%
Total 26 100% 18 100%
Sources: SWITRS 2023, TIMS 2023, Fehr & Peers 2023
Figure 29 shows the geographic locations of collisions involving pedestrians.

Almost 50 percent of pedestrian collisions occurred along highways including I-80 between Davis and West Sacramento, SR 113 connecting Knights Landing, Woodland, and Davis, and SR 16 connecting unincorporated communities like Guinda, Esparto, and Madison to Woodland. Most of these collisions fall under the KSI category. Other concentrations of pedestrian collisions occurred in Clarksburg, Dunnigan, and Esparto as well as on county roads between Davis and Woodland.

Figure 30 shows the geographic locations of collisions involving bicyclists.

Concentrations of collisions occurred on county roads connecting Davis to Woodland, Davis to West Sacramento, and Davis to Winters, including Russell Boulevard and CR 32A. Two injury collisions occurred on CR-14 near I-505 and three occurred on SR 84 south of West Sacramento and near Clarksburg. » Other Considerations
While this collision data provides valuable insight into where bicycle and pedestrian crashes have occurred, it does not necessarily capture the full scope of safety concerns for active transportation users. Collision data alone may overlook areas that have little to no recorded incidents but are avoided because they are perceived as unsafe. This avoidance can potentially mask underlying safety issues, such as high traffic volumes or lack of dedicated bike and pedestrian facilities. Similarly, some non-injury collisions may go unreported. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of safety conditions, it is important to also consider Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) evaluations. LTS assessments help identify corridors that may deter walking and biking due to factors like speed limits, lane widths, and intersection complexity. By integrating crash data with LTS evaluations, planners and engineers can better identify not only where incidents are happening, but also where improvements are needed to encourage safe and comfortable active travel—even in places where collisions are currently rare. 62 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 63

Wi n ters
D a vi s
West
Sa cra m en to
Woodland
Guinda
Capay
M adison
Zamora
Yo l o
Knight s
Landing
Cl arksbu rg
Dunnigan
E spa r to
Wil d Win gs
Ru m sey
Brooks
E l M a c e r o
M onument
Hills
Ta n cr ed
El Rio V illa
Collisions inv olv ing Bicy clists
Figure 7
505
5 16
80 113
84 90
128
113
45 D i xon
V ac av ille
Sa cra m en to
All Other Collisions
Killed or Severely Injured Collision
Data Source:

Transportation Injury Mapping
System (TIMS), Safe Transportation
Research and Education Center,
University of California, Berkeley.

Figure 30: Collisions Involving Bicyclists
64 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 65

Level of Traffic Stress
People who walk or bike on roadways encounter varying levels of stress depending on the surrounding traffic conditions. A quiet, low volume residential street with a 25 mile per hour speed limit may be considered a low-stress environment while a high-volume multilane road with 40 mile per hour speed limit may represent a high stress environment. Studies have shown the high stress of walking, biking, or rolling without protection from fast vehicular traffic is a chief deterrent to people’s decision to travel by active transportation. Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) is a way to quantify the amount of discomfort people feel when they bike or walk close to traffic. The methodology used assigned a Streetscore+ numeric stress level to bikeways and sidewalks within the unincorporated communities, taking different variables that influence pedestrian and bicyclist comfort at roadway segments (sidewalk width, lighting, sidewalk quality, number of travel lanes, etc.) into consideration. The resulting scores range from 1 to 4, where a score of 4 correlates to the least comfortable walking or biking experience.

Figure 31: Level of Stress and Comfort for Pedestrians
» Walking and Biking Level of Traffic Stress in Unincorporated Yolo County A LTS analysis revealed that there were varying levels of comfort for active transportation within the unincorporated areas of Yolo County. Generally, these areas lack essential pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, making such activities feel anywhere from mildly uncomfortable to outright unsafe for many residents.

Within the unincorporated communities, the absence of sidewalks, dedicated bike lanes, adequate lighting, and frequent curb cuts that disrupt pedestrian pathways in locations that are more rural and see low vehicular traffic might make walking and biking feel uncomfortable, but viable. However, locations near corridors that carry higher volumes of high-speed traffic, such as SR 16 in Esparto, feel less safe and increase vulnerability for pedestrians and bicyclists using those corridors. Moreover, traveling between communities is particularly challenging due to the high-speed nature of connecting roadways and the absence of protected bikeways. The Level of Traffic Stress Analysis methodology and findings for the unincorporated communities can be found in Appendix B.

Figure 32:

Level of Stress and Comfort for Bicyclists
66 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Existing Conditions | 67

COMMUNITY &

STAKEHOLDER

ENGAGEMENT
Community and stakeholder
engagement is at the heart of
developing a Plan that truly reflects the
needs, values, and lived experiences
of the people it serves. Recognizing
that the communities targeted for
active transportation improvements
have often been underrepresented,
marginalized, or overlooked in
similar planning processes, the
project team intentionally designed
engagement strategies to meet Yolo
County residents where they are. This
included conducting all in-person
events and visiting communities on
foot to establish connections before
the events, distributing flyers, and
speaking directly with residents
about the project, rather than relying
solely on digital marketing. The
team emphasized the importance of
connecting with every community,
understanding that it would be a
challenge, and worked diligently to
ensure outreach was meaningful
and effective. These efforts created
safe and welcoming spaces where
participants felt comfortable sharing
their perspectives, with staff actively
supporting attendees to ensure
their voices were heard. Barriers to
participation were further reduced
through measures such as providing
translations of all event materials and
notices in the primary language(s)
spoken in each community. By
consistently involving community
members and stakeholder groups,
the team was able to identify local
priorities, understand barriers to
walking, biking, and rolling, and build
trust to support future implementation.

Outreach efforts focused on
communities across Esparto,
Clarksburg, Yolo, Capay, Guinda,
Madison, Dunnigan, Knights Landing,
El Rio Villa, and the cities of Davis, West
Sacramento, Woodland, and Winters,
resulting in 33 public-facing events
and six advisory group meetings over
two phases. Inclusivity, accessibility,
and genuine representation guided
every step of the engagement process.
03 68 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Community & Stakeholder Engagement | 69

Engagement and
Communication Strategies
Project StoryMap and Crowdsource+
An online project StoryMap was created to provide an online platform for project information and updates and collect public feedback. The StoryMap contains a link to a Crowdsource+ mapping tool that allows community members to post concerns, recommendations, and general comments relevant to active transportation, and vote on proposed recommendations directly at the sites pertaining to those comments.

Online Storymap
Crowdsource+
Advisory Groups
Throughout both outreach phases,
a Steering Committee and Technical
Advisory Committee (TAC) were
engaged to provide guidance
toward Plan development. Each
group included representatives
from various sectors and agencies,
such as the incorporated cities,
Caltrans, and non-profit/community-
based organizations. These different
participants offer a broad range of
knowledge, perspectives, and priorities
that can lead to more effective
planning outcomes. Presentations
were also made to the YoloTD
Citizen’s Advisory Committee (CAC).

These groups were convened to discuss
project goals, outreach strategies, and
existing conditions data, and later,
provide input toward improvement
recommendations and corridor
selection for improvement projects,
and review project prioritization criteria.

There were two Steering Committee
meetings, three TAC meetings,
and two CAC meetings in total.

The following organizations
were invited to participate in the
project Steering Committee and
provided valuable feedback on the
direction and priorities of the plan.

Bike Davis
The Bike Campaign
Cool Davis
Cache Creek Conservancy
Capay Valley Vision
Communicare - Yolo County
Davis Bike Club
Delta Protection Commission
Empower Yolo
Mercy Coaliton
Mutual Housing
Putah Creek Council
RISE, Inc. (Rural Innovations
in Social Economics)
Tuleyome
Visit Yolo
Washington School District (West Sac)
Winters Health Care
Woodland Community College
Woodland Memorial Hospital
Woodland United Way
Yocha Dehe Wintun Tribe
Cache Creek Casino Resort
Yolo County Farm Bureau
Yolo County Health and Human Services
Yolo County Children’s Alliance
Yolo County Housing Authority
Yolo Food Bank
Yolo Healthy Aging Alliance
Yolo Mobility
West Sacramento Chamber of Commerce
Yolo Solano Air Quality
Management District
70 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Community & Stakeholder Engagement | 71

Workshops, Pop-Ups, and Community Open Houses
To encourage meaningful discussion and gather input for Plan development, the project team held evening workshops and community open houses to accommodate working individuals and families. Staff also engaged residents through pop-up booths at popular community events, bringing the project directly to where people already gather. Spanish interpreters were available at nearly all events to ensure accessibility for Spanish- speaking participants, and a Russian interpreter supported meetings in West Sacramento, which has a significant Russian-speaking population.

Phase 1: Visioning and Existing Conditions
Phase 1 occurred between November 2023 and June 2024 and focused on existing conditions and Yolo County residents’ travel experiences and needs.

Phase 1 involved workshops, community open houses, and pop-up booths at community events; the launching of a project website and map tool that collected digital comments; and a Steering Committee meeting.

Prairie Form And Place It! Workshops
Phase 1 consisted of workshops that were also partially led by the Prairie Form and PlaceIt! teams, who utilized a play-based community planning approach involving accessible, hands-on activities. At these workshops, attendees were tasked with using materials provided to build a model representing their first memory of mobility, and then an ideal version of their community, emphasizing the kinds of transportation facilities and amenities they wished to see. These model- building activities were also facilitated at a select number of pop-up events.

Pop-Ups and Community Events
Booths discussing the YATC project were set up at larger and well-attended events throughout the county to increase community exposure to the Plan and gain input. These events included the Capay Valley Almond Festival; Northern Valley Indian Health Community Health Fair; El Día de los Niños Festival; RISE, Inc. Collaborative Annual Meeting; CommuniCare+OLE Event; Rancho Yolo Information Fair; and SACOG Annual Racial Equity Action Plan Tour.

Community Open Houses
Community open house meetings took place in the incorporated cities of Davis, West Sacramento, and Woodand. Boards with project information and interactive activities aimed at gathering feedback were displayed for attendees to view and interact with at their leisure. Attendees were presented with project information along with the Plan’s vision and goals and encouraged to share input on their travel experiences and concerns.

Yolo County Climate Action And Adaptation Plan Workshops In the fall and winter of 2023, Yolo County held their Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) workshop series targeting Yolo County residents. This series was used as an opportunity to introduce the YATC project to the community, since it has a similar outreach audience to the YATC Plan. These workshops consisted of discussions on transportation-specific strategies and concerns.

72 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Community & Stakeholder Engagement | 73

Phase 1 Takeaways
Throughout Phase 1 engagement, community members expressed strong interest in facilities such as sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes, and shared-use paths. They also indicated a desire for traffic calming measures to improve safety and reduce speeding; features such as roundabouts, rumble strips, additional stop signs, speed bumps, and lighting were identified. There were also multiple mentions of accessibility, specifically for infrastructure improvements that support mobility, such as ADA-compliant ramps. Maintenance and cleanliness of transportation facilities were indicated as common concerns, as well as interest in amenities such as benches, restrooms, bicycle parking facilities, wayfinding, and tree shading in conjunction with both recreational and community facilities.

Overall, residents wished for a robust active transportation network that not only connected them to their destinations but is comfortable, safe, and enjoyable to use.

Phase 1 feedback was used to inform the development of initial project recommendations, including local improvements within unincorporated communities, as well as the identification of the regional bikeway network proposed to connect communities to each other.

Phase 2: Recommendations
and Prioritization
Following the identification of a draft network and locations for biking and walking improvements, a second phase of outreach was held between fall 2024 and January 2025. Phase 2 Outreach focused on soliciting feedback on the draft recommendations and identifying further desired improvements and amenities. This included discussions with community members on how their feedback from Phase 1 was incorporated into the proposed projects. Outreach activities in this phase consisted of community open houses, a pop-up workshop, updates to the project website and webmap comment tool, and a second Steering Committee meeting.

Community Open Houses
Community open houses were held in the same unincorporated communities targeted for Phase 1 outreach, as well as the incorporated cities of Davis, West Sacramento, and Woodand. Boards displaying the proposed recommendations, as well as a recap of the prior phase of outreach and feedback received, were presented for attendees to view, comment, and interact with. Specifically, attendees were asked to provide input on the initial improvements within the unincorporated communities, as well as the region-wide bikeway and trail network. Attendees also participated in an interactive exercise to assign a level of significance to the proposed criteria for prioritizing projects.

Pop-Ups
There was one pop-up project booth during Phase 2, which took place at the Yolo County Food Bank Resource Fair.

Phase 2 Takeaways
Overall, community members were enthusiastic about the proposed improvement projects that were presented to them. However, there were also concerns about feasibility and barriers to project implementation. For example, roads within their communities not having the physical capacity to accommodate improvements like bike lanes; community pushbacks against the potential physical alteration of their communities; and funding, among others. They also suggested additional and alternative improvements, helping to pinpoint specific locations within the unincorporated communities that would benefit greatly from them.

Appendix C contains detailed engagement summaries as well as a list of comments gathered throughout the outreach activities. 74 | Yolo Active Transportation Corridors Plan Community & Stakeholder Engagement | 75