Woodland City Council
June 2, 2026

City of Woodland

Meeting Agenda

City Council
City Hall
Council Chambers
300 First Street
Woodland, CA 95695
June 2, 2026
6:00 PM

CITY COUNCIL

CLOSED SESSION
5:30 PM

A. CALL TO ORDER

B. CLOSED SESSION

1. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Gov. Code §54957.6) Agency Designated Representative: City Manager and Director of Administrative Services
Employee Organizations: Woodland Mid-Management Professional Association, Woodland City Employees Association, Woodland Police Mid- Management Unit, Woodland Police Officers' Association, Woodland Police Supervisors Association, Woodland Fire Mid-Management Association, and Woodland Professional Firefighters Association.

JOINT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL/WOODLAND FINANCE AUTHORITY MEETING 6:00 PM

C. CALL TO ORDER

D. ROLL CALL

E. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Land Acknowledgment Statement - The City of Woodland acknowledges the land on which we live and work.

For thousands of years, this land has been the home of Patwin people. Today, there are three federally recognized Patwin tribes: Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community, Kletsel Dehe Wintun Nation, and Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation. The Patwin people have remained committed to the stewardship of this land over many centuries. It has been cherished and protected, as elders have instructed the young through generations. We are honored and grateful to be here today on their traditional lands.

F. COMMUNICATIONS - PUBLIC COMMENT

This is an opportunity for the public to speak to the Council on any item other than those listed on this agenda.

Speakers are requested to use the microphone in front of the Council and to begin by stating their name, whether they reside in Woodland and the name of the organization they represent if any. The Mayor may impose a time limit on any speaker depending on the number of people wanting to speak and time available for the rest of the agenda. In the event comments are related to an item scheduled on the agenda, speakers may be required to wait to make their comments until that item is considered. The option to submit a public comment via voicemail is no longer available. Written Public Comments Members of the public are welcome to submit written comments prior to the meeting. Comments should be submitted by email to [email protected]. Written Comments received at least two (2) hours prior to the scheduled start time of the City Council meeting will be provided to the City Council and posted to the City website as part of the official record of the meeting but will not

be read into the record. Written Comments received within two (2) hours of the scheduled start time of the City Council meeting and during the City Council meeting will be provided to the City Council the day following the City Council meeting. If you are submitting written comments on a particular item on the agenda, please identify the agenda item number and letter. If you are submitting written comments on an item not listed on the agenda, please identify your e-mail/comment as a General Public Comment. Note: Public comments at special meetings are limited to items on the agenda only.

2. SUBJECT: General Public Comments

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: This section is reserved for "General" Public Comments emailed within two (2) hours prior to the Council Meeting. These comments will be provided to the City Council and incorporated into the meeting minutes. Any other written communications submitted for items specific to this agenda will be attached as a file to the associated agenda item.

G. COMMUNICATIONS - COUNCIL/STAFF STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS

This is an opportunity for the Council Members and Staff to make comments and announcements, to express concerns, or to request Council's consideration of any items a Council Member would like to have discussed at a future Council meeting.

3. SUBJECT: Long Range Calendar

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the Long Range Calendar for informational purposes only.

H. PRESENTATIONS

I. CONSENT CALENDAR

4. SUBJECT: Proclamation Supporting Volunteerism

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve a proclamation promoting volunteerism and recognizing JustServe.org.

5. SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes of May 5, 2026 and May 19, 2026.

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the minutes of the Joint Regular City Council/Woodland Finance Authority Meeting of May 5, 2026 and May 19, 2026.

6. SUBJECT: Sustainability Advisory Committee Minutes

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and review the Sustainability Advisory Committee's minutes from February, March, and April 2026.

7. SUBJECT: Freeman Street Right of Way Abandonment

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving a Summary Vacation of excess public right of way along the 334 Freeman Street property frontage and authorizing the City Manager to execute a quit claim deed.

8. SUBJECT: Award Construction Contract for 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. ______,

1.) Authorizing the reallocation of $550,000 of Measure F Funds in FY25/26

from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01;

2.) Authorizing the reallocation of $604,740.91 of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA-SB1) Funds in FY24/25 from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01;

3.) Authorizing the reallocation of $4,675 of Water Enterprise Funds in FY25/26 from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01, to fund improvements associated with water utility conflicts;

4.) Approving a construction contract for the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01 (Project); awarding the construction contract in the amount of $1,946,403.40 for the base bid plus all additive alternates A, B, and C to B&M Civil LLC; authorizing a contract contingency up to 15% ($291,960.51); and authorizing the City Manager to execute the construction contract and change orders; and

5.) Approving a consultant services agreement for construction management and inspection services with Associated Engineering Consultants, Inc., in the amount of $186,184; authorizing a contract contingency up to 15% ($27,927.60); and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement and amendments.

9. SUBJECT: Approval of the List of Projects for FY 26/27 Funded by Senate Bill 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Funds

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving a list of projects for FY 26/27 funded by Senate Bill 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account funds.

10. SUBJECT: Approval of Asset Management and Maintenance Service Agreement with APGN, Inc. for High-Speed Turbo Blowers at the Water Pollution Control Facility

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____ authorizing the City Manager to execute a five year Asset Management and Maintenance Service Agreement with APGN, Inc. for the Water Pollution Control Facility high speed turbo blower system in an amount not to exceed $327,125.

11. SUBJECT: Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project (CIP 24-08) – Final Acceptance and Notice of Completion

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, to

1. Accept the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion (CIP 24-08) construction contract as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion; and

2. Approve a consultant services contract amendment with Laugenour & Meikle in the amount of $20,500 for a total agreement amount of $193,716 and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.

J. PUBLIC HEARINGS

12. SUBJECT: Adoption of the City’s 2025 Urban Water Management Plan

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. ___, adopting the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan.

13. SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Adoption of the City’s Water Shortage Contingency Plan

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct a public hearing to receive comments on the proposed update to the City of Woodland Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP), 2. Adopt Resolution No. ______, approving the updated WSCP, Appendix G of the Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP).

14. SUBJECT: Assembly Bill 2561: Local Public Employees Vacant Positions

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommend the City Council 1) Hold a public hearing, and 2) Receive the informational report on the City of Woodland Vacancies and Recruitment and Retention Efforts Pursuant to Government Code Section 3502.3.

K. REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER

15. SUBJECT: Woodland Tourism and Business Improvement District Annual Report and Resolution of Intention to Levy Annual Assessment for Fiscal Year 2026/2027

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council 1) Approve the Annual Report from the Advisory Board for the Woodland Tourism Business Improvement District; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. _____, with the intention to levy the annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2026/2027.

16. SUBJECT: Presentation of the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Proposed Budget

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive a presentation on the proposed budget for fiscal year 2026/27.

17. SUBJECT: Consideration of November 2026 Ballot Measure to Authorize a One-Cent Sales Tax

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive a presentation and provide direction to staff on a potential ballot measure to establish a one-cent sales tax for general city services, programs, and facilities.

L. ADJOURN

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Agenda for the Joint Regular Meeting of the Woodland Finance Authority/ City Council of the City of Woodland scheduled for June 2, 2026 was posted on May 29, 2026 in the outside display case at City Hall, 300 First Street, Woodland, CA, and was available to the public during normal business hours.

Marissa Kersey
City Clerk

Upon request, agendas and documents in the agenda packet will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by law. Any such

requests must be made in writing to the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Woodland.

Requests will be valid for the calendar year in which the request is received, and must be renewed prior to January 1st.

Persons needing disability-related modifications or accommodations in order to participate in public meetings, including persons requiring auxiliary aids or services, may request such modifications or accommodations by calling the Office of the City Clerk (530-661-5806) at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: June 2, 2026
ITEM #: F.2
SUBJECT: General Public Comments

This section is reserved for "General" Public Comments emailed within two (2) hours prior to the Council Meeting. These comments will be provided to the City Council and incorporated into the meeting minutes. Any other written communications submitted for items specific to this agenda will be attached as a file to the associated agenda item.

Attachments:

None

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: June 2, 2026
ITEM #: G.3
SUBJECT: Long Range Calendar

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the Long Range Calendar for informational purposes only.

Attachments:

1. Council Long Range Calendar

CITY COUNCIL LONG RANGE CALENDAR

June 16th REGULAR MEETING
Woodland Hotels Business Improvement District Annual Assessment – Public Hearing Lighting & Landscaping Districts – Resolution of Intent to Levy Annual Assessments Calling and Consolidating a General Election for Council Districts and Measures Board and Commission Appointments
FY 26 Budget Adoption

July 7th REGULAR MEETING
Award ASR Well #31 Drilling Project, CIP 17-05
Award Meter Install Construction Project, Gibson Ranch Water Meter Replacement Project, CIP 26-16 Authorize Bidding for Interceptor Sewer CCTV Project, CIP 14-15

July 21st REGULAR MEETING
City Solar Arrays – Madison Energy PPA Buyout
Operating Agreement Renewal – Epic Pros/Space Station
Weed Abatement and Waste Management Liens
2026/27 CDBG Action Plan
Public Hearing: Lighting and Landscaping Districts

August 4th SUMMER RECESS - NO REGULAR MEETING

Future Topics / Study Sessions:

YoloTD Short Range Transit Plan Presentation (TBD)
Library Eave and Roof Replacement Project - Approve Plans and Authorize Bid (TBD) Sewer and Water Rate Adjustment – 218 Hearing (TBD)
Updated 5/29/2026

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: June 2, 2026
ITEM #: I.4
SUBJECT: Proclamation Supporting Volunteerism

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council approve a proclamation promoting volunteerism and recognizing JustServe.org.

Attachments:

1. Proclamation - JustServe

PROCLAMATION

COMMITMENT TO VOLUNTEERISM

WHEREAS, we firmly believe that the values of compassion, empathy, and community support are the foundation of a united harmonious society and fosters connections that transcend differences; and

WHEREAS, the strength and prosperity of our cities, towns, and villages are based in the selflessness of its residents to serve and uplift one another; and

WHEREAS, we acknowledge the profound impact that can be achieved when we extend a helping hand to our neighbors, especially those of diverse backgrounds and lifting them up and collectively working to improve lives; and

WHEREAS, we nurture a culture of giving within our cities, emphasizing that volunteerism is not just a duty but a source of personal fulfillment and community strength; and as we work side by side with and learn from each other, mutual understanding increases, misconceptions can be corrected, and new friendships are built; and

WHEREAS, we urge all citizens to care for one another, volunteer, and engage in acts of service and kindness that contribute to our city's betterment and its inhabitants' well-being, regardless of background or belief; and

WHEREAS, the City of Woodland has joined a growing list of supporters, including the President of the National League of Cities and hundreds of leaders to date, in making a commitment to volunteerism.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED the City of Woodland commits to promoting volunteerism, leveraging JustServe.org to make it easier for residents to find and engage in volunteer opportunities and will regularly acknowledge and celebrate the contributions of volunteers.

DATED: June 2, 2026
_________________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor

Mayra Vega, Mayor Pro Tempore David Moreno, Council Member

Tania Garcia-Cadena, Council Member Rich Lansburgh, Council Member

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: June 2, 2026
ITEM #: I.5
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes of May 5, 2026 and May 19, 2026.

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the minutes of the Joint Regular City Council/Woodland Finance Authority Meeting of May 5, 2026 and May 19, 2026.

Attachments:

1. Draft City Council Minutes for May 5, 2026

2. Draft City Council Minutes for May 19, 2026

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: June 2, 2026
ITEM #: I.6
SUBJECT: Sustainability Advisory Committee Minutes

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and review the Sustainability Advisory Committee's minutes from February, March, and April 2026.

Staff Contact:

Spencer Bowen, Communication & Strategic Policies Manager | [email protected], (530) 661-5808

Discussion:

Please find attached recent meeting minutes from Woodland's Sustainability Advisory Committee.

Highlights include:
• February Meeting: Committee brainstormed on possible applications for the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District's (YSAQMD) Clean Air Funds grant program. • March Meeting: Recommendation on YSAQMD grant direction to pursue (E-Bike fleet for staff).
• April Meeting: Discussion of recommendation for general fund dollars earmarked for sustainability; recommendation will return to Council in the coming months.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council receive and review the Sustainability Advisory Committee's minutes from February, March, and April 2026.

Attachments:

1. Minutes - Sustainability Advisory Committee 02.18.26

2. Minutes - Sustainability Advisory Committee 03.18.26

3. Minutes - Sustainability Advisory Committee 04.15.26

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: June 2, 2026
ITEM #: I.7
SUBJECT: Freeman Street Right of Way Abandonment

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving a Summary Vacation of excess public right of way along the 334 Freeman Street property frontage and authorizing the City Manager to execute a quit claim deed.

Staff Contact:

Lolly Weichel, Senior Engineering Assistant, (530) 661-5950, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The proposed summary vacation of this excess road right of way will have no negative fiscal impact on the City. Conversely, the vacation eliminates future City obligations and liability associated with this surplus land.

Background:

Beamers Addition Subdivision, recorded in 1887, created an eighty (80) foot public street right of way designated Freeman Street. The existing road and sidewalk improvements utilize only sixty (60) feet of the dedicated right of way, leaving ten (10) feet of excess right of way on each side of the road improvements abutting to the back side of the sidewalk.

The property owners, Friends of the Mission, have requested the abandonment of the excess right of way adjacent to their property in support of the Opportunity Village development project providing twelve low-income residential units. The new property line will be located immediately along the back of the sidewalk, consistent with most property lines throughout the City. A public utility easement will be retained by the City to facilitate maintenance of all existing and future public utilities.

A legal description and map of the proposed abandonment area are attached as Exhibits A and B.

As required by California Government Code Section 65402, the Planning Commission made a finding on February 19, 2026, that the proposed abandonment is in conformity with the City's General Plan.

Discussion:

Per California Code, once the proposed abandonment is found in conformity with the City's General Plan, the excess right of way may be summarily vacated per the California Streets and Highways Code (§ 8331) if:

1. The street or highway has been impassable for vehicular travel for five consecutive years; and

2. No public funds were expended for maintenance during that period.

The subject area meets these criteria as it is currently non-traffic bearing and is surplus to the City's transportation needs.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving a Summary Vacation

of excess public right of way along the 334 Freeman Street property frontage and authorizing the City Manager to execute a quit claim deed.

Prepared by: Lolly Weichel, Senior Engineering Assistant Reviewed by: Ed Wisniewski, Principal Civil Engineer

Attachments:

1. Abandonment Legal and Plat

2. Aerial Exhibit

3. Proposed Resolution - Freeman Street Right of Way

4407
November 19, 2024

EXHIBIT “A”

LAND DESCRIPTION

RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT

THAT portion of real property situate in the City of Woodland, County of Yolo, State of California, and being a portion of the East half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29, Township 10 North, Range 2 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, being a portion of Freeman Street as shown on that map of Beamers Addition to the Town of Woodland, recorded in Book 42 of Deeds at Page 563, said County Records, said County Records, and being more particularly described as follows:

BEGINNING at a point on the East line of said Freeman Street, said point being the Southwest corner of Parcel No. 1, as described in the Deed to the City of Woodland, recorded October 19, 1979, in Book 1393 of Official Records, at Page 615, said County Records; thence, along the East line of Freeman Street, said line also being the Westerly line of Lots 11 and 12 of Block 4 as shown on that map of Beamers Addition to the Town of Woodland, recorded in Book 42 of Deeds at Page 563, said County Records, South 00°24’08” West 94.50 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot 12; thence, leaving said East line, North 89°24’09” West 10.00 feet; thence North 00°24’08” East 78.07 feet; thence North 31°47’18” East 19.20 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 0.020 acre of land, more or less.

RESERVING for the City of Woodland a Public Utility Easement over the land described above.

The basis of bearings for this description is South 89°24’09” East, being the centerline of Kentucky Avenue, as shown in Book 2006 of Maps at Page 165, said County Records.

End of description.

___________________________ ____________
Bryan P. Bonino, L.S. Date
11/21/24

©LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE©LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE
LMLAUGENOUR AND MEIKLECIVIL ENGINEERING · LAND SURVEYING · PLANNING· · LM

Map Title
Legend
COWGIS
Address Points
Parcels
Aerial Imagery with Labels - 2025
Red: Red
Green: Green
Blue: Blue
Notes
0 50 100 ft
Surplus right of way
to be abandoned.

82093.00006\33073364.4

RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

CITY OF WOODLAND

No fee document per
Government Code 27383

WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City Clerk
City of Woodland
300 First Street
Woodland, CA 95695

This space above for Recorder’s Use Only

RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

WOODLAND SUMMARILY VACATING AN UNUSED PORTION OF

ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG FREEMAN STREET PURSUANT TO
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 8330 ET SEQ., AND

FINDING THAT ADEQUATE CONSIDERATION EXISTS FOR THE

TRANSFER OF THE PROPERTY, ONCE VACATED, TO THE

LANDOWNER OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY

WHEREAS, the City of Woodland (“City”) holds title to that certain unused 94.5-foot long portion of a 10-foot wide strip of unused public road right of way along the east side of Freeman Street (described in Exhibit A and shown in Exhibit B) (referred to herein as the “ROW”), located in the City, which lies between those properties commonly known as APNs 005-594-003 and 005-595-001; and

WHEREAS, the City has title to the road ROW pursuant to that certain Beamer’s Addition Subdivision, as recorded on December 10, 1887, in Deed Book 42 Page 563 in the Official Records of the County of Yolo, State of California; and

WHEREAS, the ROW was dedicated for use as an 80-foot-wide public street, of which only a 60-foot portion was improved, and the City of Woodland has determined is not needed for this area; and

WHEREAS, the excess ROW has not been improved as a public street or maintained by the City of Woodland in the known history of the property, and there are no current or planned public improvements for this excess right-of-way; and

WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Woodland that once the ROW is vacated, all of the City’s right, title and interest in the Street ROW will be transferred to the adjacent owner; and

82093.00006\33073364.4

WHEREAS, the summary vacation proceedings are to be conducted pursuant to the provisions in § 8330 – 8336, Chapter 4 of Part 3, Division 9, entitled “Summary Vacation,” of the State of California Streets & Highways Code; and

WHEREAS, Section 8331 of the California Streets and Highways Code provide that the City Council of the City of Woodland may summarily vacate an excess right-of-way of a street or highway that is impassable for vehicular travel and no public money was expended for maintenance on the street or highway for at least the past consecutive five years immediately preceding this vacation; and

WHEREAS, application has been made to the City on behalf of the owner of the adjacent property for summary vacation of the ROW and the owner has paid the applicable fees for processing the ROW vacation; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 65402(a), the Planning Commission of the City of Woodland reviewed the proposed vacation of ROW and Easements at its regularly scheduled meeting on February 19, 2026, and found that vacation of the ROW located along the east side of Freeman Street conforms with the City’s General Plan; and

WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 8336, the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution, attested by the Clerk under seal, to be recorded without acknowledgement, certificate of acknowledgement, or further proof in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Yolo, and no fee shall be charged for this recordation.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1. Order of Vacation. The City Council, under the authority vested in it by the California Streets and Highways Code, Division 9 - Change of Grade and Vacation, Part 3 - Public Streets, Highways, and Service Easements Vacation Law (Sections 8300 et seq.), Chapter 4 - Summary Vacation (Streets & Highways Code sections 8330 et seq.), hereby orders the vacation of the ROW and any and all interests that the City may have therein, as more particularly described and depicted in the attached Exhibits A and B. From and after the date this Resolution is recorded, the portion of the road described in Exhibit A and shown in Exhibit B shall no longer constitute a public street.

SECTION 2. Authority for Vacation. The summary vacation of the ROW is made based on the fact that, pursuant to Streets and Highway Code section 8331, this is a street or highway that has been impassable for vehicular travel for a period of at least five consecutive years and no public money was expended for maintenance on the street or highway during such period.

82093.00006\33073364.4

SECTION 3. General Plan Conformity. The vacation of ROW has been found by the Planning Commission of the City of Woodland to be in conformity with the City of Woodland General Plan.

SECTION 4. Additional Finding; Authorization to Transfer the Street. The City Council additionally finds that, in consideration for the findings set forth in this Resolution, adequate consideration exists for the ROW to be transferred to the adjacent owner. The City Council, as permitted by California Streets & Highways Code section 8355, hereby authorizes the City Manager, once the ROW is vacated, to transfer any and all of the City’s interest in the ROW, whether by quitclaim deed, termination of easement, or any other document(s), to the adjacent property owner, and to execute any and all documents required for such transfer and to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution.

SECTION 5. CEQA Finding. This action is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Title 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15305 as a minor alteration in land use limitations.

SECTION 6. Certification, Recordation and Retention. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 8336, the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution, attested by the Clerk under seal, to be recorded without acknowledgement, certificate of acknowledgement, or further proof in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Yolo, and pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 8336, no fee shall be charged for this recordation. The City Clerk shall permanently maintain a true and correct copy of this Resolution in the City Clerk’s Office.

SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption.

Upon the recordation required hereby, the vacation is complete, and from and after the date this Resolution is recorded, the street, highway, or public service easement vacated no longer constitutes a street, highway, or public service easement.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: June 2, 2026
ITEM #: I.8
SUBJECT: Award Construction Contract for 2026 Road
Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. ______,

1.) Authorizing the reallocation of $550,000 of Measure F Funds in FY25/26 from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01;

2.) Authorizing the reallocation of $604,740.91 of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA-SB1) Funds in FY24/25 from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01;

3.) Authorizing the reallocation of $4,675 of Water Enterprise Funds in FY25/26 from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01, to fund improvements associated with water utility conflicts;

4.) Approving a construction contract for the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01 (Project); awarding the construction contract in the amount of $1,946,403.40 for the base bid plus all additive alternates A, B, and C to B&M Civil LLC; authorizing a contract contingency up to 15% ($291,960.51); and authorizing the City Manager to execute the construction contract and change orders; and

5.) Approving a consultant services agreement for construction management and inspection services with Associated Engineering Consultants, Inc., in the amount of $186,184; authorizing a contract contingency up to 15% ($27,927.60); and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement and amendments.

Staff Contact:

Diana Ayón, Senior Associate Civil Engineer, (530) 661-5967, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The project is identified in the current Capital Budget as CIP 26-01 with a total budget of $1,535,000.

The project funding consists of $1,510,000 in Measure F funding and $25,000 in Water Enterprise Funds to fund improvements associated with water utility conflicts.

With the recommended actions to reallocate $550,000 of Measure F Funds, $604,740.91 of RMRA- SB1 Funds, and $4,675 of Water Enterprise Funds from CIP 25-02, the total Project budget will increase to $2,694,415.91, allowing the award of the three listed bid alternates. There is sufficient remaining funding from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to be reallocated to this Project. The Project funding is consistent with the approved Capital Budget and the Measure F Spending Plan.

The project budget includes the costs for design, project management, construction management, inspection, construction, and contingency.

There is no impact to the General Fund.

Background:

In November 2016, Woodland voters approved Measure F, which extended the ½ cent supplemental

sales tax. The 12-year approval of Measure F, a General Tax, includes funding for general city services including pavement maintenance.

Staff maintains a pavement management program that tracks pavement conditions and aims to address pavement maintenance on local streets with the Measure F funds.

Pavement maintenance is significantly different than pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction, which repairs failed roadways. The goal of pavement maintenance is to prevent reactive road repair by proactively preserving and maintaining pavements in fair condition which have not yet deteriorated to the point of needing rehabilitation.

To increase cost efficiency and minimize public inconvenience, pavement maintenance for local/residential streets has historically been completed in discrete ‘zones’ of the city. Geographically bounding projects reduces the cost for construction and traffic control; it also increases the effectiveness of management and inspection. Over 14 years, the city completed pavement maintenance projects in all the 14 designated zones. With road maintenance having been completed on local roads in all 14 designated zones, staff shifted its focus over the last several years to collector streets in need of preventative maintenance services. Starting with the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, staff is now focusing again on maintenance on local roads in zones while still addressing some collectors.

The project includes pavement maintenance seals on all local roads and construction of ADA ramp improvements within Zone 1 of the City. This is the area bounded by Main Street, CR98, West Street, and the northern City limits. There are also segmented additive alternates on Ashley Avenue including asphalt grind and overlay, striping improvements, and ADA ramps.

The local roads in the zone will receive differing treatments chosen as appropriate for the age and condition of the roads. Applying the right treatments at the right time is the most effective method of pavement preservation and extending the useful life of the roadway. ADA improvements are included with the project in accordance with State and Federal requirements.

Discussion:

On April 7, 2026, Council approved plans and specifications for the project. On May 19, 2026, the City received three bids for construction of the project.

Staff performed due diligence in reviewing the bids and the bids complied with the technical submittal requirements. The City received the following bids:

Bidder Name Base Bid
Amount
Base Bid Plus
All Additive
Alternates
B&M Civil LLC $1,354,906.65 $1,946,403.40
Pavement
Coatings Co.
$1,634,318.60 $2,170,902.41
VSS
International,
Inc.
$1,590,120.00 $2,186,120.00

B&M Civil LLC has been determined to be the lowest responsible, responsive bidder, which, per the bidding documents, was determined by the base bid plus all alternates.

The project was bid with the following three additive alternates (listed with the low bidder’s price for the alternate):
• Additive Alternate A: N. Ashley Ave (Kentucky to Woodland Ave): $264,947.50 o Includes: Grind & Overlay and Striping improvements
• Additive Alternate B: N. Ashley Ave (Woodland Ave to Beamer St): $300,849.25 o Includes: Grind & Overlay, Striping improvements, and ADA ramps • Additive Alternate C: Ashley Ave (Beamer to Main St): $25,700.00 o Includes: Striping improvements

Staff requests that Council award the construction contract for the base bid plus all additive alternates A – C amount of $1,946,403.40. Awarding the base bid plus all additive alternates will improve one-mile of the Ashley Avenue corridor in addition to surface sealing all local streets in Zone

1. To provide adequate construction management and specialized inspection and testing services for the project, staff is requesting that the Council approve a consultant services agreement with Associated Engineering Consultants, Inc. (AEC) in the amount of $186,184. AEC is on the City’s construction management and inspection services on-call list to be called upon on an as-needed basis. The on-call list was selected in September 2018 as part of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for construction management and inspection services. AEC has managed similar City pavement maintenance construction projects.

Staff is requesting that the Council approve a contingency up to 15% on both the construction and consultant contracts to account for the work and inspection associated with unforeseen conditions on the project. This contingency percentage for both contracts is based on staff’s experience with similar roadway projects.

Staff anticipates construction starting in June 2026 with completion by fall 2026.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. ______,

1.) Authorizing the reallocation of $550,000 of Measure F Funds in FY25/26 from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01;

2.) Authorizing the reallocation of $604,740.91 of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA-SB1) Funds in FY24/25 from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01;

3.) Authorizing the reallocation of $4,675 of Water Enterprise Funds in FY25/26 from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01, to fund improvements associated with water utility conflicts;

4.) Approving a construction contract for the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01 (Project); awarding the construction contract in the amount of $1,946,403.40 for the base bid plus all additive alternates A, B, and C to B&M Civil LLC; authorizing a contract contingency up to 15% ($291,960.51); and authorizing the City Manager to execute the construction contract and change orders; and

5.) Approving a consultant services agreement for construction management and inspection services with Associated Engineering Consultants, Inc., in the amount of $186,184; authorizing a

contract contingency up to 15% ($27,927.60); and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement and amendments.

Prepared by: Diana Ayón, Senior Associate Civil Engineer

Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, Community Development Director/ City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Project Map

2. Proposed Resolution - CIP 26-01

PROJECT MAP

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND REALLOCATING $550,000 OF MEASURE F FUNDING, REALLOCATING $604,740.91 OF RMRA-SBI FUNDING, REALLOCATING $4,675 OF WATER ENTERPRISE

FUNDING AND APPROVING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AND CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR THE 2026 ROAD MAINTENANCE PROJECT, CIP 26-01

WHEREAS, the City of Woodland has $1,535,000 of Measure F and Water Enterprise funds identified in the Capital Budget to maintain and extend the life of Woodland's street network, referred to as the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01 (the “Project”); and

WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to reallocate $550,000 of Measure F Funds in FY25/26 from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01; and

WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to reallocate $604,740.91 of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA-SB1) Funds in FY24/25 from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01; and

WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to reallocate $4,675 of Water Enterprise Funds in FY25/26 from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01, to fund improvements associated with water utility conflicts; and

WHEREAS, the City Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized bid advertisement on April 7, 2026; and

WHEREAS, the City received three bids on May 19, 2026, and of the three received bids, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder was B&M Civil LLC as determined by their base bid plus all alternates amount of $1,946,403.40; and

WHEREAS, the City wishes to award the construction contract to B&M Civil LLC in the amount of $1,946,403.40 and authorize a contingency up to 15% ($291,960.51); and

WHEREAS, the City desires to have the construction management, inspection and testing performed by an experienced consultant that has managed similar pavement maintenance projects for the City; and

WHEREAS, the City wishes to approve the consultant services agreement for construction management and inspection services with Associated Engineering Consultants, Inc. in the amount of $186,184 and authorize contingency up to 15% ($27,927.60); and

WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to approve the above-mentioned contracts and authorize their execution through the adoption of this Resolution; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the reallocation of $550,000 of Measure F Funds in FY25/26 from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the reallocation of $604,740.91 of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA-SB1) Funds in FY24/25 from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the reallocation of $4,675 of Water Enterprise Funds in FY25/26 from the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, to the 2026 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 26-01, to fund improvements associated with water utility conflicts.

SECTION 4. The City Council hereby approves the construction contract with B&M Civil LLC in the amount of $1,946,403.40. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract and change orders up to 15% ($291,960.51) of the original contract amount, subject to City Attorney approval. The City Attorney is hereby authorized to make clarifying and conforming changes so long as the total dollar amount authorized herein does not change.

SECTION 5. The City Council hereby approves the consultant services agreement with Associated Engineering Consultants, Inc. in the amount of $186,184. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the agreement and amendments up to 15% ($27,927.60) of the original contract amount, subject to City Attorney approval. The City Attorney is hereby authorized to make clarifying and conforming changes so long as the total dollar amount authorized herein does not change.

SECTION 6. Copies of the Construction Contract and Consultant Agreement for Construction Management and Inspection Services are available and on file in the City Clerk’s office and are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND, ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ________________________________ Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: June 2, 2026
ITEM #: I.9
SUBJECT: Approval of the List of Projects for FY 26/27 Funded by Senate Bill 1 Road Maintenance and
Rehabilitation Account Funds

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving a list of projects for FY 26/27 funded by Senate Bill 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account funds.

Staff Contact:

Diana Ayón, Senior Associate Civil Engineer, (530) 661-5967, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

In fiscal year 26/27, the City will receive an estimated $1,729,051 from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) created by Senate Bill 1 (SB1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. The list of projects that are funded in part or solely with FY 26/27 RMRA revenue are included in the current Capital Budget. Due to SB1 funding requirements, staff will return annually (prior to July 1 each year) to establish the City’s priority for receipt of RMRA funding.

The projected revenue to the City of Woodland for the first ten years of SB1 RMRA is just over $16 million.

There is no impact to the General Fund.

Background:

In April 2017, SB1 was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown to address the significant funding shortfall for road maintenance and repair in the state. The bill includes funding for state transportation infrastructure, public transportation and cities and counties. The bill includes annual accountability provisions for cities and counties that ensure the community has access to information on projects proposed for SB1 funding and requirements to report on actual funding expenditures. Beginning in November 2017, the State Controller began depositing SB1 funding into the RMRA, a portion of which is distributed by formula directly to cities and counties.

For the City of Woodland to continue receiving its allocation, the City must annually adopt a list of projects that will be funded in part or solely with the following fiscal year’s RMRA revenues.

Additionally, Staff submits project details and budget documentation to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) by July 1 each year for verification of compliance with SB1 requirements. The process of adopting a list of RMRA funded projects included in the Capital Budget and reporting to the CTC is an annual requirement of SB1 funding.

Discussion:

The estimated RMRA revenue for FY 26/27 is $1,729,051.

The following is the list of projects identified in the current Capital Budget as being funded in part or solely with FY 26/27 RMRA revenues:

CIP #26-01: 2026 Road Maintenance Project
• The project includes pavement maintenance seals on all local roads and construction of ADA ramp improvements within Zone 1 of the City. This is the area bounded by Main Street, CR98, West Street, and the northern city limits. There are also segmented additive alternates on Ashley Avenue including asphalt grind and overlay, striping improvements, and ADA ramps.
• The project is estimated to cost approximately $2.7 million. The project is funded in part with RMRA, Measure F, and Water Enterprise funds. The project will likely begin construction in June 2026 with completion by November 2026.

CIP #26-08: College, Beamer & Cross Rehabilitation Project • The project will rehabilitate College Street from Topaz Way to Gibson Road, Beamer Street from Cottonwood Street to East Street, and Cross Street from West Street to East Street. The project will rehabilitate the existing asphalt roadways, install new buffered bicycle lanes, install new sidewalks to close pedestrian network gaps, install ADA- compliant curb ramps, install pedestrian improvements and traffic signal upgrades. The project will rehabilitate these roads, creating and improving over four miles of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, enhancing connectivity to, and closing critical gaps in, the active transportation network.
• The project is estimated to cost $9.5 million. RMRA revenue projection through FY 2029 is $9.6 million. The City is actively seeking additional road rehabilitation grant funding for these road segments. If received, the programmed RMRA funding will be used to supplement and match grant funds. This project will likely begin construction in 2027.

The annual submittal of project details to the CTC does not preclude the City from amending the funded projects to align with City needs and priorities as long as all projects are consistent with RMRA priorities and are eligible road maintenance and rehabilitation projects.

SB1 funding has a requirement that funded projects be identified in the City’s Capital Improvement Budget and that Council adopt the list of RMRA funded projects each year. However, the City is required to only identify one year at a time. Thus, the current Council action to adopt a project list funded by RMRA only addresses the next fiscal year.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving a list of projects for FY 26/27 funded by Senate Bill 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account funds.

Prepared by: Diana Ayón, Senior Associate Civil Engineer

Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, CDD Director/City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - 2026 SB1

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND TO ADOPT A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FY 26/27 FUNDED BY SB1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017

WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and

WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure residents are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and

WHEREAS, the City adopts a Capital Budget which includes all projects to receive funding from Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which includes a description and the location of each proposed project; and

WHEREAS, the City will receive an estimated $1,729,051 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2026/27 from SB 1.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby adopts the following list of newly proposed projects that will be funded in part or solely with FY 26/27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:
• CIP #26-01: 2026 Road Maintenance Project
o The estimated useful life of the project is 10-15 years. o This project will likely begin construction in June 2026 and conclude in November 2026.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby adopts the following previously proposed and adopted list of projects that may also utilize FY 26/27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues in their delivery. With the relisting of these projects in the adopted fiscal year resolution, the City is reaffirming to the public and the State our intent to fund these projects with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:
• CIP #26-08: College, Beamer & Cross Rehabilitation Project o The estimated useful life of the project is 15 years. o This project will likely begin construction in July 2027 and conclude in June 2029. This allows adequate revenue to build the project in its entirety.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at regular meeting held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ________________________________ Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: June 2, 2026
ITEM #: I.10
SUBJECT: Approval of Asset Management and Maintenance
Service Agreement with APGN, Inc. for High-Speed
Turbo Blowers at the Water Pollution Control Facility

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____ authorizing the City Manager to execute a five-year Asset Management and Maintenance Service Agreement with APGN, Inc. for the Water Pollution Control Facility high speed turbo blower system in an amount not to exceed $327,125.

Staff Contact:

Shane Carlsen, Treatment Plant Superintendent, 530-661-2054, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

Funding was budgeted for the previous five-year agreement. The proposed not to exceed contract amount is $327,125, an increase of about 20% which equates to about 4% per year. No additional appropriations are requested at this time.

Background:

The city’s Water Pollution Control Facility utilizes four APGN high speed turbo blowers as part of the secondary wastewater treatment process. The blowers provide dissolved oxygen to the aeration basins and are critical to maintaining treatment performance and compliance with the city’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit requirements.

The blower system was installed as part of the 2016 Water Pollution Control Facility expansion project. Since installation, the equipment has operated continuously, with at least one blower in operation at all times and additional units operating during periods of peak flow and loading.

In 2021, the city entered into an Asset Management and Maintenance Service Agreement with APGN to provide maintenance support, warranty coverage, and technical services for the blower system.

The agreement has assisted the city in maintaining reliable operation of this critical treatment equipment while minimizing unexpected repair costs and operational disruptions.

Discussion:

Staff is requesting approval to renew the Asset Management and Maintenance Service Agreement with APGN for an additional five-year term. The proposed agreement provides continued manufacturer support and maintenance services for the city’s four turbo blowers, including two NX200 C070 units and two NX300 C070 units.

The proposed agreement includes:
• Asset management and system upgrades
• Extended warranty coverage for major blower components • Remote monitoring and technical support services

• Annual preventive maintenance inspections and operational assessments • Priority access to replacement parts and field service support • Technical training and operational support for city staff • Software verification and updates
• Inspection and testing of blower controls, sensors, bearings, valves, and electrical components The agreement also includes 24-hour technical support, remote troubleshooting capability, and priority response services intended to reduce downtime and improve operational reliability.

The five-year agreement amount is $327,125, based on an annual cost of $65,425. APGN provided pricing options for three, five, and ten-year agreements, and staff recommends the five-year option as the best balance between long-term cost stability and operational flexibility.

Because the turbo blower system is proprietary equipment manufactured by APGN, the manufacturer is uniquely qualified to provide the specialized maintenance services, software support, warranty coverage, and replacement components necessary to maintain reliable system operation.

The services provided in the Asset Management and Maintenance Service Agreement with APGN are proprietary to APGN, in that there is no competitive market for the services because only APGN has the existing ability to interface with the equipment involved and for a competitor to independently generate the means to provide the services would involve a substantially higher capital expense and likely violate the intellectual property rights of APGN, (Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. Los Angeles (1922) 188 Cal. 307), and otherwise because competitive bidding would work an incongruity and be unavailing as affecting the final result, not produce any advantage, and it is practically impossible to obtain what is required and to observe such form as set forth in Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment Agency (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 631, 636.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____ authorizing the City Manager to execute a five-year Asset Management and Maintenance Service Agreement with APGN, Inc. for the Water Pollution Control Facility high speed turbo blower system in an amount not to exceed $327,125.

Prepared by: Courtney Morgan, Management Analyst
Reviewed by: Craig Locke, Director of Public Works

Attachments:

1. APG Neuros Asset Mngmt. and Maint. Service Proposal

2. Proposed Resolution - APGN Agreement

I.

Date : April 7, 2026
Presented to:

Mr. Josh Vieira

City of Woodland, CA
42929 County Road 24
Woodland, CA 95776
Phone: 530-635-3250
Email:
[email protected]

APGN Inc.
1270, Michèle-Bohec, Blainville, Québec J7C 5S4
Tel.: 450 939-0799 Fax: 450 939-2115 Web site: www.apg-neuros.com 2 Our Proposal

Reference: AM-2026-6588 AMMSP - 14-0027 City of Woodland, CA

Subject: Proposal for an Asset Management and Maintenance Service Plan

Equipment covered: Two (2) NX200-C070 and Two (2) NX300-C070

Dear Mr. Vieira,

We are pleased to provide you with our proposal for an Asset Management and Maintenance Service Plan for our product in your facility.

We trust that our High -Speed Turbo Blowers have met your expectations throughout the life of the operation at your facility. APG -Neuros is continuously listening to its customers to develop the highest quality products and offer the latest product innovations to keep your blowers technologically current and up to date.

This plan has been carefully designed to provide you with a peace -of-mind operation, protecting your turbo blowers from unscheduled events. Through the Asset Management, we incorporate the latest improvements and developments into your Turbo Blowers and proactively manage their health throughout their life cycle, maintaining the equipment technologically up to date and maximizing their efficiency. The Asset Management and Maintenance Service Plan provides protection from unexpected maintenance spending thro ugh the Extended Warranty as well as priority supply of spare parts when needed.

Our Asset Management and Maintenance Service Plan includes:

A. Asset Management – Upgrades
B. Extended Warranty
C. Remote Monitoring System
D. Extended Preventive Routine Maintenance

APGN Inc.
1270, Michèle-Bohec, Blainville, Québec J7C 5S4
Tel.: 450 939-0799 Fax: 450 939-2115 Web site: www.apg-neuros.com 3 A. Asset Management – Upgrades
The Asset Management maintains the Turbo Blowers technologically up to date.

Includes:

Mandatory or recommended
product modifications

Recommended upgrades and
new component developments
Fine tuning of turbo blower(s)
and aeration system
Participation in manufacturer’s
maintenance and support
development
After Hours Remote Technical Support (by telephone),
as required:
- 24 hour a day - 365 days a year customer service
support line by calling at 1-855-423-2746
- Priority access to the field support team
- Priority on availability of parts and modules
within 72 hours
- Priority on availability of replacement cores
(loaners) at no charge to minimize downtime
- Field service report after each visit
- Refresher training on turbo blower preventive
maintenance activities
Dedicated Regional Manager for first response on field
support
- Regular meetings with customers to listen to
current concerns and future needs
- Regular training sessions for on-site personnel

APGN Inc.
1270, Michèle-Bohec, Blainville, Québec J7C 5S4
Tel.: 450 939-0799 Fax: 450 939-2115 Web site: www.apg-neuros.com 4 B. Extended Warranty
The Extended Warranty eliminates the need to worry about capital and maintenance budget restrictions. It covers the cost of repairing or replacing major components when out of service.

The Extended Warranty includes:

1. Blower core:
• High efficiency impeller,
• Permanent magnet synchronous motor,
• Bump-foil air bearings,
• Diffuser fan,
• Motor casing.

2. Variable speed drive/inverter

3. Input line reactor

4. Sine-wave (sinus) filter

5. Blower local control panel and Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) components

6. HMI touch-screen components

7. Internal vibration and absorption mounts

8. Vibration sensors and monitoring

9. Discharge expander (discharge cone)

10. Blow off by-pass valve and solenoid parts

11. Blow off silencer

12. Sound attenuating enclosure

13. Check valve seals and discs

14. Stop valve body seals and discs

15. External expansion joint

APGN Inc.
1270, Michèle-Bohec, Blainville, Québec J7C 5S4
Tel.: 450 939-0799 Fax: 450 939-2115 Web site: www.apg-neuros.com 5 C. Remote Monitoring System
Remote Monitoring System and support as permitted by the customer. o Enables site managers to make better informed decisions through useable data of Turbo Blower operation.
o Fine tuning and monitoring of aeration system that allows for optimal Turbo Blower operation.

Option C1
Customer allows APGN to have remote access.
• APGN will have a real-time view of all analog values of the Turbo Blower.
• Elevated security with independent 3G/LTE mobile network connection.
o No on-site Wi-Fi connection required.
o Site can enable or disable access at anytime.

Option C2
Customer provides operational data to APGN.
• APGN will not have remote access.
• Up to twice per year, operation and diagnostics reporting on operating units, when available. Customer will provide
operational data from its control system to APGN for analysis such as:
a. Motor speed and temperature
b. Suction flow rate and temperature
c. Discharge pressure and temperature
d. Filter pressure drop
e. Bearing temperature
f. Power consumption
g. Rotor vibration
h. VFD temperature
i. Ambient temperature and ambient relative humidity
j. Blower status
k. Fault codes

APGN Inc.
1270, Michèle-Bohec, Blainville, Québec J7C 5S4
Tel.: 450 939-0799 Fax: 450 939-2115 Web site: www.apg-neuros.com 6 D. Extended Preventive Routine Maintenance
Our Extended Preventive Routine Maintenance is designed in accordance with the standards of the annual health check and inspection outlined in the O&M manual.

- One (1) on-site maintenance and inspection visit by a manufacturer’s Field Service Technician. - Customized classroom/hands-on training to your staff’s needs. o Also available through videoconference.
- Inspection and cleaning or replacement of air intake filters (inside the turbo blower). - Inspection and cleaning of dirt and debris in enclosure, sealing air leaks as required. - Visual inspection of core.
- Core shaft torque measurement to assess condition.
- Bump start alignment of the core bearings.
- Audible and visual inspection of unit to determine health of connections, valves, and gaskets. - Verification of PLC and HMI software, ensuring it is operational and suitable for the blower control. - Verification of blower protection from surge or adverse operating conditions. - Review and analysis of PLC error history, identifying trends and providing recommendations as needed. - Verification of the PLC and HMI software version including the new protection or optimization, and update to latest standard, if applicable.
- Inspection for loose electrical and mechanical connections, tightening as required. - Inspection of all electrical wiring for signs of overheating or wear. - Verification of sensors functionality, replacing as required. - Inspection of blower operation following factory specifications and adjustment of control parameters to adapt to the operating environment.
- Inspection of paint and fasteners, applying touch-up paint to areas the size of up to a quarter dollar coin and replacing fasteners as required.
- For liquid cooled models only:
o Coolant system check and top up as required.
o Perform coolant flush (every 3 years)
▪ Customer to dispose the old fluid.
- Field service report including a comprehensive check list for each blower.

Additionally, this plan includes:
• After Hours Remote Technical Support (by telephone), as required. ▪ 24 hour a day - 365 days a year customer service support line by calling at 1-855-423-2746
▪ Response time within 1 hour
▪ Up to 150 hours of technical support
▪ Remote trouble shooting for operation issue and diagnostics of unit, where remote access is available and provided by customer. • 10% discount on spare parts and air filters.

APGN Inc.
1270, Michèle-Bohec, Blainville, Québec J7C 5S4
Tel.: 450 939-0799 Fax: 450 939-2115 Web site: www.apg-neuros.com 7 Price:

Three-year option: US $ 69,270.00 + taxes (where Applicable) per year for three (3) years of coverage.

Five-year option: US $ 65,425.00 + taxes (where Applicable) per year for five (5) years of coverage.

Ten-year option: US $ 63,115.00 + taxes (where Applicable) per year for ten (10) years of coverage. ➢ The above prices include coverage for Two (2) NX200-C070 and Two (2) NX300-C070.

Exclusions:

The following consumables and life limited parts are excluded from the coverage:

- Air filters elements
- BOV orifice diaphragm
- Coolant fluids
- Fuses
- Gaskets
- Hardware and fittings
- Power supplies
- Thermocouple and thermocouple transmitter
- Transformer 560/480 – 110/220 V
- Existing rusted areas on enclosure are not covered under the warranty

Note: A pre-inspection of the turbo blowers may be required prior enrollment of the Asset Management and Maintenance Service Plan.

This proposal is valid until July 7, 2026.

Sincerely,

Joe Gerardo
Life Cycle Regional Manager
P 1-951-370-4310
E [email protected]

APGN Inc.
1270, Michèle-Bohec, Blainville, Québec J7C 5S4
Tel.: 450 939-0799 Fax: 450 939-2115 Web site: www.apg-neuros.com 8 About APG-Neuros
Founded in 2005, APG -Neuros is recognized as
the force behind the successful introduction of
the high-efficiency turbo blower technology to
the water and wastewater treatment market in
North America and Europe, modernizing and
bringing a much-needed change to the existing
aging industry. APG -Neuros turbo blowers are
used in a variety of industrial applications and
wastewater treatment processes, with over
1500 units installed in over 500 installations in
North America and Europe, and more than
3000 additional units installed worldwide.

APG-Neuros continues to lead the industry by constantly driving and propelling innovation forward through the most technologically advanced products and artificial inte lligence aeration control solutions to achieve maximum energy efficiency and operational flexibility for our customers.

OUR MISSION
APG-Neuros is committed to achieving customer satisfaction by providing quality products and services delivered on time while maintaining a safe environment for our employees in a setting that promotes resource sustainability. APG-Neuros honors its commitm ents by integrating quality and environmental considerations into the decision-making process.

OUR VISION
To be recognized as the reference technology company for producing innovative products, including the Turbo Blowers, Turbo Compressors, and other efficient and affordable technology products.

OUR VALUES

1. Innovation: We strive for continuous technological development and innovation. We conduct in -house R&D programs to keep innovating and improving our products and services.

2. Integrity: Promote a culture of transparency, continuous improvements and strive for a sustainable business model.

3. Team: Ensure employee empowerment and fulfillment through continued skills development and career advancement.

4. Environment: We strive to limit the impact of our activities and our product on the environment.

OUR CERTIFICATIONS

APGN Inc.
1270, Michèle-Bohec, Blainville, Québec J7C 5S4
Tel.: 450 939-0799 Fax: 450 939-2115 Web site: www.apg-neuros.com 9 Acceptance and Authorization

Your signature below indicates your authorization to proceed with the enrollment to the Asset Management and Maintenance Service Plan.

For Customer For APGN inc.

Omar Hammoud
Name Name
CEO & President
Title Title

Signature Signature

Date Date

The APG-Neuros Aftermarket Team thanks you for your trust.

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

APPROVING A FIVE-YEAR ASSET MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE
SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH APGN, INC. FOR THE WATER POLLUTION

CONTROL FACILITY HIGH SPEED TURBO BLOWER SYSTEM FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $327,125
WHEREAS, the City’s Water Pollution Control Facility utilizes four APGN high speed turbo blowers to provide dissolved oxygen to the aeration basins as part of the wastewater treatment process; and
WHEREAS, the turbo blower system is critical to maintaining compliance with the Water Pollution Control Facility National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit requirements; and
WHEREAS, the turbo blowers require specialized preventive maintenance, technical support, software updates, inspections, and replacement components to ensure continued reliable and efficient operation; and
WHEREAS, APGN, Inc., as the manufacturer of the turbo blower system, is uniquely qualified to provide the required maintenance services, warranty coverage, technical expertise, proprietary software support, and replacement components for the equipment; and WHEREAS, the proposed Asset Management and Maintenance Service Agreement includes preventive maintenance services, extended warranty coverage, remote monitoring support, technical assistance, software verification, operational inspections, and staff training for the blower system; and
WHEREAS, the total not to exceed contract amount for the five-year agreement term is $327,125, with funding to be included in future Water Pollution Control Facility operating budgets; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has determined that entering into the Asset Management and Maintenance Service Agreement with APGN, Inc. is in the best interests of the City and its administrative operations; and
WHEREAS, the services provided in the Asset Management and Maintenance Service Agreement with APGN are proprietary to APGN, in that there is no competitive market for the services because only APGN has the existing ability to interface with the equipment involved and for a competitor to independently generate the means to provide the services would involve a substantially higher capital expense and likely violate the intellectual property rights of APGN.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the City Manager’s determination that entering into the Asset Management and Maintenance Service Agreement with APGN, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $327,125 is in the best interests of the City, because the services provided in the Asset Management and Maintenance Service Agreement with APGN are proprietary to APGN, in that there is no competitive market for the services because only APGN has the existing ability to interface with the equipment involved and for a competitor to independently generate the means to provide the services would involve a substantially higher capital expense and likely violate the intellectual property rights of APGN, (Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. Los Angeles (1922) 188 Cal. 307), and otherwise because competitive bidding would work an incongruity and be unavailing as affecting the final result, not produce any advantage, and it is practically impossible to obtain what is required and to observe such form as set forth in Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment Agency (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 631, 636.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a five-year Asset Management and Maintenance Service Agreement with APGN, Inc. for the Water Pollution Control Facility high speed turbo blower system in an amount not to exceed $327,125.

SECTION 4. The Asset Management and Maintenance Service Agreement with APGN, Inc. is exempt from competitive bidding as a contract for proprietary services from a sole supplier,
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ________________________________ Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: June 2, 2026
ITEM #: I.11
SUBJECT: Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project (CIP 24-08) – Final Acceptance and Notice of
Completion

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. ____, to

1. Accept the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion (CIP 24-08) construction contract as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion; and

2. Approve a consultant services contract amendment with Laugenour & Meikle in the amount of $20,500 for a total agreement amount of $193,716 and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.

Staff Contact:

Ed Wisniewski, Principal Civil Engineer, (530) 661-5975, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The project is currently funded in the Capital Budget with $2,300,000 in Capital Projects Funds (Fund 1501). The total project cost at the conclusion of project closeout is anticipated to be approximately $2.175 million according to the breakdown below:

Design $194,000.00 8.9%
Construction (including all change orders) $1,768,000.00 81.3% Project Management (& overhead) $90,000.00 4.1%
Construction Management & Inspection $97,000.00 4.5%
Misc (PG&E, Permitting, etc.) $26,000.00 1.2%
Total $2,175,000.00

Background:

Master planning and public outreach efforts for the Woodland Sports Park identified a need to construct additional parking to support ongoing expansion. Construction of the new aquatics center accelerated the need to provide the necessary additional parking prior to completion of the project. In January 2024, Laugenour and Meikle was awarded the contract to prepare improvement plans for the parking lot expansion. The design of the project included conversion of the existing turf area fronting East Street to additional parking. A total of 96 new parking spaces, including 8 ADA accessible spaces and 4 electric vehicle charging stations, were proposed with the project. In addition, the project incorporated infrastructure to provide 28 EV-capable parking spaces for future equipping as EV charging stations.

The project plans and specifications were advertised for bid on February 13, 2025, and on March 11, 2025, the City received 17 bids. All Phase Construction was the lowest responsible bidder providing a responsive bid of $1,609,801.07. They were awarded the construction contract on March 18, 2025.

Discussion:

Construction of the parking lot expansion began on June 9, 2025. The majority of the parking lot improvements were completed by December 2025 and the expanded parking lot was made available for public use at that time. Long lead time electrical equipment delayed final completion of the electric vehicle improvements to May of 2026. At this time, all improvements have been completed, and the project is ready for acceptance by City Council.

City Council authorized a construction contract contingency of 15% (Approx. $240k). Over the course of construction, 3 change orders were executed totaling $155,026 (10% of the contract value). Most of the change orders were related to delays in receiving the approved PG&E plan for service to the EV chargers, which resulted in some redesign and delays in ordering the costly electrical switchgear.

Modifications to the proposed landscape irrigation system were also required due to incomplete records of the originally constructed system. Overall, the project was a successful collaboration between City staff, the City’s construction management consultant (Kitchell), and All Phase Construction and their subcontractors, resulting in the total project coming in under budget.

As discussed above, changes to the electrical and irrigation systems were required during construction, which led to additional work for the design team. As a result, Laugenour and Meikle (L&M) have requested a contract amendment to cover the cost of the additional design efforts. L&M has provided a proposal fee of $20,500 for additional services during construction.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, to

1. Accept the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion (CIP 24-08) construction contract as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion; and

2. Approve a consultant services contract amendment with Laugenour & Meikle in the amount of $20,500 for a total agreement amount of $193,716 and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.

Prepared by: Ed Wisniewski, Principal Civil Engineer

Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, Community Development Director/City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Contract Amendment - Laugenour & Meikle

2. Aerial Photography - Construction Progress

3. Proposed Resolution - CIP 24-08

4th Amendment To Professional Services Agreement Between The City Of Woodland And Laugenour and Meikle CM#200300
City of Woodland 1
Community Center Parking Expansion, CIP # 24-08 4th AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1. PARTIES AND DATE
This Third Amendment to the Professional Services A greement (“Third Amendment”) dated as of the _____ day of _________________, 202 6 is entered into by and between the City of Woodland (“City”) and Laugenour & Meikle (“Consultant”).

ARTICLE 2. RECITALS

2.1 City and Consultant entered into that certain Prof essional Services Agreement dated January 29, 2024 (“Agreement”), whereby Consu ltant agreed to professional engineering and land surveying consulting services.

2.2 City and Consultant now desire to amend the Agreem ent to:
extend term of the agreement to December 31, 2026 ; and increase the amount of compensation and revise the Scope of Services in accordance with the Consultant’s proposals dated July 15, 2025 & December 8, 2025 attached hereto. The total compensation for the [#4] Amendme nt shall not exceed twenty thousand five hundred ($20,500.00) for a new contract total not t o exceed one hundred ninety-three thousand seven-hundred sixteen dollars ($193,716.00).

ARTICLE 3. TERMS

3.1 Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.

3.2 Adequate Consideration. The Parties hereto irrevocably stipulate and agre e that they have each received adequate and independent co nsideration for the performance of the obligations they have undertaken pursuant to this Amendment.

3.3 Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in duplicate origi nals, each of which is deemed to be an original, but when taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

4th Amendment To Professional Services Agreement Between The City Of Woodland And Laugenour and Meikle CM#200300
City of Woodland 2
Community Center Parking Expansion, CIP # 24-08 4th AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT City Of Woodland Laugenour & Meikle
By: ___________________________ By: _______________ ____________ Ken Hiatt Bryan P. Bonino
City Manager Principal
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Marissa Kersey, City Clerk

4th Amendment To Professional Services Agreement Between The City Of Woodland And Laugenour and Meikle CM#200300
City of Woodland 3
Community Center Parking Expansion, CIP # 24-08 4th AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

CONSULTANT PROPOSAL FOR ADDITIONAL WORK
CHANGE REQUEST #5

CHANGE REQUEST #6

T
OTAL REQUEST #5 + 6 = $20,500.00

COMMUNITY CENTER PARKING EXPANSION PROJECT (CIP 24-08) –

CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS

Conceptual Design (December 2024)

Preconstruction (6/30/2025)

Construction Progress (6/30/2025)

Construction Progress (12/3/2025)

EV Charging Scope of Work

Switchgear Installation (May 2026)

82093.00001\8555510.2
RESOLUTION NO. ___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

ACCEPTING THE COMMUNITY CENTER PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROJECT (CIP 24-08) CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY CLERK TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION

WHEREAS, the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project, CIP 24-08 (the “Project”), is identified in the Capital Budget; and

WHEREAS, the Project is currently funded with $2,300,000 in General Capital Funds (Fund 1501); and

WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Project plans and specifications and authorized bid advertisement on December 17, 2024, and the Project was advertised for bids on February 13, 2025; and

WHEREAS, on March 18, 2025, the City Council authorized the City Manager to award and execute a construction contract with All Phase Construction, Inc. in the amount of $1,609,801.07 and approved a construction contingency up to 15% of the contract amount ($241,470); and

WHERAS, All Phase Construction, Inc. has completed construction of all project improvements which includes expansion of the existing Community & Senior Center parking lot to the former turf area west of the main entrance with an additional 96 parking stalls, including 8 new ADA stalls. Additionally, the Project equipped 4 existing parking spaces with EV charging equipment and ran infrastructure to an additional 28 stalls for future equipping; and

WHEREAS, the construction of the parking lot expansion project began in June 2025 and was completed in May 2026; and

WHEREAS, the total project cost at the conclusion of project closeout is anticipated to be approximately $2.175 million; and

WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to accept the construction contract as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a notice of completion; and

WHEREAS, the City wishes to approve a contract amendment with Laugenour and Meikle for additional electrical and irrigation design services during construction in the amount of $20,500 for a total contract amount of $193,716 and authorize its execution through the adoption of this Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

82093.00001\8555510.2
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby accepts the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project (CIP 24-08) construction contract as complete.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion for the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project (CIP 24-08).

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby approves a Contract Amendment with Laugenour and Meikle in the amount of $20,500. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Amendment, subject to City Attorney approval. The City Attorney is hereby authorized to make clarifying and confirming changes so long as the total dollar amount authorized in the Amendment does not change.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ________________________________ Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: June 2, 2026
ITEM #: J.12
SUBJECT: Adoption of City’s 2025 Urban Water Management Plan

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. ___, adopting the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan.

Staff Contact:

Celia Taylor, Water Quality Specialist II – (530) 661-5915, [email protected]

Background:

The Urban Water Management Planning Act requires water suppliers providing over 3,000 acre‐feet per year or serving more than 3,000 connections to submit and update Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) to the State Department of Water Resources (DWR) every 5 years. These plans are foundational documents for assessing long-term water supply reliability, serving existing customers, and supporting future development aligned with the City’s 2035 General Plan.

Drought conditions and the implementation of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) make reliable water supplies more critical than ever. Additionally, California AB 1668 and SB 606 mandated that retail agencies establish per capita water use targets.

Public Notification
Public notice for the public hearing was prepared by the Community Development Department in accordance with the City of Woodland Municipal Code and State Planning Law. The following outreach steps were taken:
• Legal Notice: Published in the Woodland Daily Democrat. • Direct Notification: Mailed notices to nearby and regional water agencies. • Document Availability: Copies of the proposed 2025 UWMP are available for public review at the following locations:

City of Woodland City Hall (300 First Street)
Online on the City of Woodland Utility Engineering & Public Works website.

Discussion:

The Urban Water Management Planning Act directs "urban water suppliers" to prepare a comprehensive plan every five years. It provides a framework for long-term resource planning to ensure adequate supplies are available to meet existing and future demands, including detailed assessments of water reliability under normal, single-dry, and five-consecutive-dry-year scenarios.

Regulatory Background & Legislative Updates
The UWMP Act has been continuously modified to respond to California’s climatic and drought challenges. Notable amendments include:
• Water Conservation Act of 2009 (SB X7-7): Required agencies to establish targets to achieve statewide water savings.

• 2018 Water Conservation Legislation: Mandated additional requirements for UWMPs, including a Five Consecutive Dry-Year Water Reliability Assessment, Drought Risk Assessment, Seismic Risk section, Energy Use reporting, updated Water Shortage Contingency Plans (WSCPs), and a simple "Lay Description" of findings. • 2025 Cycle Requirements: Plans are to be adopted and submitted to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) following the most updated Final 2025 UWMP Guidebook and legislation.

City Water System & UWMP Compliance
The 2025 UWMP update describes the City’s water system, historical and projected use, and supply sources. It compares projected supplies to demands in five-year increments through 2050.

Additionally, as required by SB X7-7, this Plan confirms the City successfully complied with its 2020 water conservation target, easily beating its per capita goal of 232 gallons per person per day by achieving an actual rate of just 152 gallons per person per day.

The City’s 2025 UWMP (or Plan) has been prepared in accordance with the UWMP Act, as defined by the California Water Code, Division 6, Part 2.6, Sections 10610 through 10656 (Urban Water Management Planning), and the Water Conservation Act of 2009 (WC Act, also known as SB X7-7), as defined by California Water Code, Division 6, Part 2.55, Section 10608 (Sustainable Water Use and Demand Reduction).

The 2025 UWMP reflects a converged policy and regulatory landscape emphasizing legal compliance with State Water Code requirements for urban water suppliers, enhanced climate resilience planning, updated demand projections, and emergency preparedness through WSCPs.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. ___, adopting the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan.

Prepared by: Celia Taylor, Water Quality Specialist II
Reviewed by: Tim Busch, PE, Utilities Engineering Manager Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, PE, Community Development Director/ City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - UWMP

2. R - 204 - City of Woodland 2025 Urban Water Management Plan - Public Draft - May 2026

RESOLUTION NO. ___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND TO ADOPT THE URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN, CIP 25-06

WHEREAS, in accordance with the Urban Water Management Planning Act (California Water Code Section 10610 et seq.), the City of Woodland is required to update its Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP, or the “Plan”) to meet the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) requirements for a 2025 UWMP. The City’s last UWMP was adopted in June 2020; and
WHEREAS, the Plan shall be periodically reviewed at least once every five years, and that the City shall make any amendments or changes to its plan which are indicated by the review; and

WHEREAS, the Plan must be adopted by July 1, 2026, after public review and hearing, and filed with the California Department of Water Resources within thirty days of adoption; and

WHEREAS, the City has prepared and circulated for public review a draft Urban Water Management Plan, and a properly noticed public hearing regarding said Plan was held by the City Council on June 2, 2026, and

WHEREAS, the City of Woodland will file said Plan with the California Department of Water Resources within 30 days of adoption.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1. The 2025 Urban Water Management Plan is hereby adopted and ordered filed with the City Clerk; the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to file the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan with the California Department of Water Resources within 30 days after this date;

SECTION 2. A copy of the UWMP is located at www.cityofwoodland.gov and is made a part of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ________________________________ Marissa Kersey, City Clerk Ethan Walsh, City Attorney

PREPARED BY

2025 Urban Water Management Plan

PREPARED FOR

City of Woodland

DRAFT REPORT | MAY 2026

DRAFT REPORT | MAY 2026

2025 Urban Water Management Plan

Prepared for
City of Woodland

Project No. 204-60-25-68

Prepared by: Monique Day, PE, RCE #69793 Date

QA/QC Review: Rhodora Biagtan, PE, RCE #59371 Date

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
i City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. ES-1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... ES-1 California Water Code Requirements ............................................................................................... ES-1 City of Woodland Water System ....................................................................................................... ES-2 Water Use By City Customers ............................................................................................................ ES-2 City of Woodland Water Supplies ..................................................................................................... ES-2 Conservation Target Compliance ...................................................................................................... ES-3 City of Woodland Water Service Reliability ...................................................................................... ES-3 Water Shortage Contingency Plan .................................................................................................... ES-3 UWMP Preparation, Review, and Adoption ...................................................................................... ES-3 Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 1-1

1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Importance and Extent of City’s Water Management Planning Efforts ........................................ 1-1

1.3 Changes from 2020 UWMP ........................................................................................................... 1-1

1.4 Plan Organization .......................................................................................................................... 1-2 CHAPTER 2 Plan Preparation ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 2-1

2.1 Basis for Preparing a Plan .............................................................................................................. 2-1

2.2 Regional Planning .......................................................................................................................... 2-1

2.3 Individual or Regional Planning and Compliance .......................................................................... 2-1

2.4 Fiscal or Calendar Year and Units of measure ............................................................................... 2-2

2.5 Coordination and Outreach ........................................................................................................... 2-3

2.5.1 Wholesale and Retail Coordination ..................................................................................... 2-3

2.5.2 Coordination with Other Agencies and the Community ..................................................... 2-3

2.5.3 Notice to Cities and Counties ............................................................................................... 2-4 CHAPTER 3 Service Area Description ................................ ................................ ................................ 3-1

3.1 General Description ....................................................................................................................... 3-1

3.2 Service Area Boundary .................................................................................................................. 3-1

3.3 Service Area Climate ...................................................................................................................... 3-1

3.4 Service Area Population and Demographics ................................................................................. 3-3

3.4.1 Service Area Population ....................................................................................................... 3-3

3.4.2 Other Social, Economic, and Demographic Factors ............................................................. 3-4

3.5 Land Uses within Service Area ....................................................................................................... 3-5

3.5.1 Current Land Uses ................................................................................................................ 3-5

3.5.2 Projected Land Uses ............................................................................................................. 3-5

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
ii City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table of Contents
CHAPTER 4 Water Use Characterization ................................ ................................ ........................... 4-1

4.1 Non-Potable Versus Potable Water Use ....................................................................................... 4-1

4.2 Water Use by Sector ...................................................................................................................... 4-1

4.2.1 Historical Potable Water Use ............................................................................................... 4-2

4.2.2 Current Water Use ............................................................................................................... 4-2

4.2.3 Projected Water Use ............................................................................................................ 4-3

4.2.4 Characteristic Five-Year Water Use ..................................................................................... 4-4

4.2.5 Estimating Future Water Savings ......................................................................................... 4-5

4.2.6 Water Use for Lower Income Households ........................................................................... 4-6

4.3 Distribution System Water Losses ................................................................................................. 4-6

4.4 Climate Change Considerations..................................................................................................... 4-9

4.5 References ................................................................................................................................... 4-11 CHAPTER 5 SB X7-7 Baselines, 2020 Target, and 2025 Reporting ................................ ....................... 5-1

5.1 Overview and Background ............................................................................................................ 5-1

5.2 2020 Daily Per Capita Water Use Compliance .............................................................................. 5-1

5.3 Regional Alliance ........................................................................................................................... 5-2 CHAPTER 6 Normal Year Water Supply Characterization ................................ ................................ .. 6-1

6.1 Purchased or Imported Water....................................................................................................... 6-1

6.2 Groundwater ................................................................................................................................. 6-3

6.2.1 Groundwater Basin Management ....................................................................................... 6-4

6.2.2 Groundwater Use – Past Five Years ..................................................................................... 6-6

6.2.3 Groundwater Use – Projected ............................................................................................. 6-7

6.3 Aquifer Storage and Recovery ....................................................................................................... 6-8

6.4 Surface Water ................................................................................................................................ 6-9

6.5 Stormwater .................................................................................................................................... 6-9

6.6 Wastewater and Recycled Water .................................................................................................. 6-9

6.6.1 Wastewater Collection, Treatment, and Disposal ............................................................... 6-9

6.6.1.1 Wastewater Collected Within Service Area ............................................................... 6-9

6.6.1.2 Wastewater Treatment and Discharge Within Service Area ................................... 6-10

6.6.2 Recycled Water Coordination ............................................................................................ 6-12

6.6.3 Recycled Water System Description .................................................................................. 6-12

6.6.4 Potential, Current, and Projected Recycled Water Uses ................................................... 6-12

6.6.5 Actions to Encourage Recycled Water Use ........................................................................ 6-14

6.7 Desalinated Water ....................................................................................................................... 6-15

6.8 Water Exchanges and Transfers .................................................................................................. 6-15

6.9 Future Water Projects ................................................................................................................. 6-15

6.9.1 Groundwater ...................................................................................................................... 6-15

6.9.2 ASR Wells ........................................................................................................................... 6-16

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
iii City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table of Contents

6.10 Summary of Existing and Planned Sources of Water ................................................................ 6-17

6.11 Climate Change Impacts to supply ............................................................................................ 6-20

6.12 Energy Intensity ......................................................................................................................... 6-21

6.13 References ................................................................................................................................. 6-25 CHAPTER 7 Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment ................................ .................. 7-1

7.1 Water Service Reliability Assessment............................................................................................ 7-1

7.1.1 Constraints on Water Sources ............................................................................................. 7-1

7.1.1.1 Purchased Water from WDCWA ................................................................................ 7-1

7.1.1.1.1 WDCWA Water Supply Constraints .................................................................. 7-1

7.1.1.1.2 Water Quality Impacts ...................................................................................... 7-2

7.1.1.1.3 Climate Change Factors .................................................................................... 7-3

7.1.1.2 Groundwater .............................................................................................................. 7-3

7.1.1.3 ASR Water................................................................................................................... 7-4

7.1.1.4 Recycled Water .......................................................................................................... 7-5

7.1.2 Year Type Characterization .................................................................................................. 7-5

7.1.3 Potable Water Service Reliability ......................................................................................... 7-6

7.1.3.1 Potable Water Service Reliability – Normal Year ....................................................... 7-7

7.1.3.2 Potable Water Service Reliability – Single Dry Year ................................................... 7-7

7.1.3.3 Potable Water Service Reliability – Five Consecutive Dry Years ................................ 7-8

7.1.4 Non-Potable Water Service Reliability ................................................................................. 7-9

7.1.4.1 Non-Potable Water Service Reliability – Normal Year ............................................. 7-10

7.1.4.2 Non-Potable Water Service Reliability – Single Dry Year ......................................... 7-10

7.1.4.3 Non-Potable Water Service Reliability – Five Consecutive Dry Years ...................... 7-11

7.2 Description of Management Tools and Options ......................................................................... 7-12

7.3 Drought Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................ 7-12

7.3.1 Data, Methods, and Basis for Water Shortage Condition.................................................. 7-12

7.3.2 DRA Water Source Reliability ............................................................................................. 7-13

7.3.3 Total Water Supply and Use Comparison .......................................................................... 7-13 CHAPTER 8 Water Shortage Contingency Plan ................................ ................................ .................. 8-1

8.1 Background .................................................................................................................................... 8-1

8.2 City Water Shortage Contingency Plan ......................................................................................... 8-1

8.3 Water Supply Reliability Analysis .................................................................................................. 8-1

8.3.1 Seismic Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plan ..................................................................... 8-2

8.4 Plan Adoption, Submittal, and Availability .................................................................................... 8-3

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
iv City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table of Contents
CHAPTER 9 Demand Management Measures ................................ ................................ ................... 9-1

9.1 Demand Management Measures for Retail Suppliers .................................................................. 9-1

9.1.1 Water Waste Prevention Ordinances .................................................................................. 9-1

9.1.2 Metering .............................................................................................................................. 9-2

9.1.3 Conservation Pricing ............................................................................................................ 9-3

9.1.4 Public Education and Outreach ............................................................................................ 9-3

9.1.4.1 Rebates ....................................................................................................................... 9-3

9.1.4.2 Communicating Water Use via Water Bills ................................................................ 9-3

9.1.4.3 School Education Programs ........................................................................................ 9-4

9.1.4.4 Information Booths at Fairs and Public Events .......................................................... 9-4

9.1.4.5 Newsletters ................................................................................................................ 9-5

9.1.4.6 Informative Websites, Online Tools, and Social Media.............................................. 9-5

9.1.4.7 Newspaper Advertisements ....................................................................................... 9-5

9.1.4.8 Other Activities ........................................................................................................... 9-5

9.1.5 Programs to Assess and Manage Distribution System Real Loss ......................................... 9-6

9.1.6 Water Conservation Program Coordination and Staffing Support ...................................... 9-7

9.1.6.1 Water Conservation Program Funding ....................................................................... 9-7

9.1.7 Other Demand Management Measures .............................................................................. 9-8

9.1.7.1 Conferences and Trainings ......................................................................................... 9-8

9.1.7.2 Memberships and Groups .......................................................................................... 9-8

9.1.7.3 Customer Support for Water Leaks ............................................................................ 9-9

9.2 Member of the California Water Efficiency Partnership ............................................................... 9-9

9.3 Continued Implementation of DMMs ........................................................................................... 9-9

9.3.1 Meeting Urban Water Use Objectives ................................................................................ 9-9

9.3.2 Annual Water Use Reporting ............................................................................................. 9-10 CHAPTER 10 Plan Adoptions, Submittal, and Implementation ................................ ........................ 10-1

10.1 Inclusion of All 2025 Data .......................................................................................................... 10-1

10.2 Notice of Public Hearing ............................................................................................................ 10-1

10.2.1 Notices to Cities and Counties ......................................................................................... 10-1

10.2.2 Notice to the Public ......................................................................................................... 10-2

10.3 Public Hearing and Adoption ..................................................................................................... 10-2

10.3.1 Public Hearing .................................................................................................................. 10-2

10.3.2 Adoption .......................................................................................................................... 10-2

10.4 Plan Submittal ........................................................................................................................... 10-3

10.5 Public Availability ....................................................................................................................... 10-3

10.6 Plan Implementation ................................................................................................................. 10-3

10.7 Amending an Adopted UWMP or WSCP ................................................................................... 10-3

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
v City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table of Contents

LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1. Retail: Public Water Systems (DWR Table 2-1) .................................................................. 2-1 Table 2-2. Plan Identification (DWR Table 2-2) ................................................................................... 2-2 Table 2-3. Supplier Identification (DWR Table 2-3) ............................................................................. 2-2 Table 2-4. Retail: Water Supplier Information Exchange (DWR Table 2-4R) ...................................... 2-3 Table 3-1. Monthly Average Climate Data Summary .......................................................................... 3-3 Table 3-2. Wholesale. Retail. Population – Current and Projected (DWR Table 3-1R) ....................... 3-4 Table 4-1. Historical Potable Water Demand by Water Use Sector .................................................... 4-2 Table 4-2. Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water – 2025 (DWR Table 4-1R) ........................ 4-3 Table 4-3. Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water – Projected (DWR Table 4-2R) ................ 4-4 Table 4-4. Projected Five-Year Potable Water Use for Retail Customers ........................................... 4-5 Table 4-5. Inclusion in Water Use Projections (DWR Table 4-3R) ....................................................... 4-5 Table 4-6. Last Five Years of Water Loss Audit Reporting (DWR Table 4-5R) ..................................... 4-7 Table 4-7. Progress Towards 2028 Water Loss Standard (DWR Table 4-6R) ...................................... 4-8 Table 5-1. SB X7-7 2020 Target Progress (DWR Table 5-1) ................................................................. 5-2 Table 6-1. Purchased or Imported Water Supplies – Actual and Projected ........................................ 6-3 Table 6-2. Groundwater Pumped in Last Five Years (DWR Table 6-1R) .............................................. 6-7 Table 6-3. Groundwater Supplies – Projected..................................................................................... 6-7 Table 6-4. Summary of ASR Well Capacities ........................................................................................ 6-8 Table 6-5. Wastewater Collected Within Service Area in 2025 (DWR Table 6-2R) ........................... 6-10 Table 6-6. Wastewater Treatment and End Uses Within Service Area in 2025 (DWR Table 6-3R) .. 6-11 Table 6-7. Current and Projected Recycled Water Direct Beneficial Uses Within Service Area (DWR Table 6-4R) .............................................................................................................. 6-13 Table 6-8. 2020 Recycled Water Use Projection Compared to 2025 Actual (DWR Table 6-5R) ....... 6-14 Table 6-9. Methods to Expand Future Recycled Water Use (DWR Table 6-6R) ................................ 6-15 Table 6-10. Expected Future Water Supply Projects or Programs (DWR Table 6-7R) ...................... 6-17 Table 6-11. Water Supplies – Actual (DWR Table 6-8R) .................................................................... 6-18 Table 6-12. Water Supplies – Projected (DWR Table 6-9R)............................................................... 6-19 Table 6-13. Energy Intensity – Total Utility Approach (DWR Table O-1C) ........................................ 6-23 Table 6-14. Energy Intensity – Wastewater & Recycled Water (DWR Table O-2) ............................ 6-24 Table 7-1. Availability of Surface Water under WDCWA’s Secondary Water Rights .......................... 7-2 Table 7-2. Basis of Water Year Data (DWR Table 7-1R) ...................................................................... 7-6 Table 7-3. Normal Year Supply and Demand Comparison – Potable (DWR Table 7-2R) .................... 7-7

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
vi City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table of Contents
Table 7-4. Single Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison – Potable (DWR Table 7-3R) ................ 7-8 Table 7-5. Multiple Dry Years Supply and Demand Comparison – Potable (DWR Table 7-4R) ........... 7-9 Table 7-6. Normal Year Supply and Demand Comparison – Non-Potable (DWR Table 7-2R) .......... 7-10 Table 7-7. Single Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison – Non-Potable (DWR Table 7-3R) ...... 7-10 Table 7-8. Multiple Dry Years Supply and Demand Comparison – Non-Potable (DWR Table 7-4R) . 7-11 Table 7-9. Projected Potable Water Supplies for Drought Risk Assessment (AF) ............................. 7-13 Table 7-10. Five-Year Drought Risk Assessment Tables to Address Water Code Section 10635(b) (DWR Table 7-5R) ........................................................................................................... 7-14 Table 9-1. Data Improvement Activities .............................................................................................. 9-6 Table 9-2. Current and Past Year Water Conservation Program Budgets .......................................... 9-8 Table 10-1. Retail: Notification to Cities and Counties (DWR Table 10-1) ........................................ 10-2

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3-1. City of Woodland Water Service Area ............................................................................... 3-2 Figure 6-1. Groundwater Basins .......................................................................................................... 6-5 Figure 9-1. Urban Water Use Objective Components ....................................................................... 9-10

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A. Urban Water Management Planning Act Legislative Requirements Appendix B. DWR 2025 Urban Water Management Plan Tables Appendix C. DWR 2025 Urban Water Management Plan Checklist Appendix D. Agency and Public Notices
Appendix E. Distribution System Water Loss Audits
Appendix F. DWR Bulletin 118: Sacramento Groundwater Basin Yolo Subbasin Appendix G. Water Shortage Contingency Plan
Appendix H. Municipal Code: Chapter 13.16 and Chapter 13.32 Appendix I. UWMP and WSCP Adoption Resolution

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
vii City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table of Contents

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
°F Fahrenheit 3-3
AB Assembly Bill 1-1
Act Urban Water Management Planning Act ES1 / 1-1
AF Acre-Feet 2-1
AFY Acre-Feet of Water Annually 2-1
AMI Advanced Metering Infrastructure 9-2
ASR Aquifer Storage and Recovery ES2 / 3-1
AWIA America’s Water Infrastructure Act 8-2
AWWA American Water Works Association 4-2
BMP Best Management Practices 9-19
CAAP Climate Action & Adaptation Plan 4-9
CalWEP California Water Efficiency Partnership 9-5
CAP Climate Action Plan 4-5
CIMIS California Irrigation Management Information System 3-3 City City of Woodland ES1 / 1-1
CWC California Water Code ES1 / 1-1
DDW Division of Drinking Water 7-2
DIM Dedicated Irrigation Meter 9-10
DMM Demand Management Measures 6-6
DOF Department of Finance 3-4
DPW City of Woodland Department of Public Works 6-9
DRA Drought Risk Assessment 4-4
DWR Department of Water Resources 1-2
DWR Guidebook 2025 Urban Water Management Plans Guidebook for Urban Water Suppliers 1-2 DWR
Methodologies
DWR Methodologies for Calculating Baseline and Compliance Urban Per Capita Water Use (2016) 5-1
DWWSP Davis Woodland Water Supply Project 4-8
EC Electrical Conductivity 6-13
ET Evapotranspiration 3-3
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency 8-2
FY Fiscal Year 9-8
gpcd Gallons Per Capita Per Day ES3 / 5-1
GSA Groundwater Sustainability Agency 1-2
GSP Groundwater Sustainability Plan ES3 / 1-2
ILI Infrastructure Leakage Index 9-12
kWh Kilowatt Hour 6-22
LHMP Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 8-2
MCL Maximum Contaminant Levels 7-2
MG Million Gallon 6-1
MGD Million Gallons Per Day 6-1
MWELO Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance 9-1

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
viii City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table of Contents
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 6-10 Project Participants City of Woodland, City of Davis, and University of California, Davis 6-16 RHNP Regional Housing Needs Plan 4-5
RRA Risk and Resilience Assessment 8-2
RUWMP Regional Urban Water Management Plan 2-1
RWTF Regional Water Treatment Facility ES2 / 6-1
SACOG Sacramento Area Council of Governments 4-5
SB X7-7 Water Conservation Act of 2009 ES1 / 1-1
SGMA Sustainable Groundwater Management Act 1-2
SP Specific Plan 3-5
State Water Board State Water Resources Control Board 1-2 SWP State Water Project 6-8
USBR United States Bureau of Reclamation 4-8
USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 7-2
UWMP Urban Water Management Plan ES1 / 1-1
UWUO Urban Water Use Objective 9-18
WDCWA Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency ES2 / 2-1
WMC Woodland Municipal Code
WPCF City of Woodland Water Pollution Control Facility ES2 / 6-1 WSCP Water Shortage Contingency Plan ES1 / 1-1
WUE Water Use Efficiency 10-3
Yolo HMP 2023 Yolo County Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan 8-2 YSGA Yolo Subbasin Groundwater Agency 4-8

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
ES-1 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Executive Summary

INTRODUCTION
An Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) helps water suppliers assess the availability and reliability of their water supplies and current and projected water use to help ensure reliable water service under different conditions. This water supply planning is especially critical for California as the state is experiencing a climate -induced shift from a predictable, snow -based water system to one defined by extreme volatility. This hydrological shift, combined with increasing development, has intensified the need for reliable water supplies. The Urban Water Management Planning Act (Act) requires larger water suppliers that provide water to urban users (whether directly or indirectly) to develop UWMPs every five years. UWMPs evaluate conditions for the next 20 to 25 years, so these regular updates ensure continued long-term planning. The City of Woodland (City) provides water service directly to more than 3,000 connections in its water service area and is therefore required to prepare a UWMP.

This Executive Summary serves as a Lay Description of the City's UWMP, as required by California Water Code (CWC) §10630.5.

CALIFORNIA WATER CODE REQUIREMENTS
The CWC documents specific requirements for California water suppliers. The Act is included in the CWC and specifies the required elements of a UWMP, including discussing an agency’s water system and facilities, calculating how much water its customers use (i.e., water demand) and how much it can supply, and detailing how it would respond during a drought or other water supply shortage. Also, a UWMP must describe what specific coordination steps were taken to prepare, review, and adopt the plan.

The Act has been revised over the years. The Water Conservation Act of 2009 (also known as SB X7-7) required retail water agencies to establish water use targets for 2020 that would result in statewide water savings of 20 percent by 2020. In their 2025 UWMPs, retail water agencies (i.e., those distributing water to end users like residences and businesses) are required to report on their compliance with SB X7-7 2020 water use targets if they did not meet the SB X7-7 targets in the 2020 UWMP.

The 2012-2016 drought led to further revisions to the Act to improve water supply planning for long-term reliability and resilience to drought and climate change. These revisions were formalized in the 2018 Water Conservation Legislation and include:
• Five Consecutive Dry-Year Water Reliability Assessment: Analyze water supply reliability for five consecutive dry years over the planning period of this plan (see Chapter 7). • Drought Risk Assessment: Assess water supply reliability for the driest 5-year period in recent record (see Chapter 7).
• Seismic Risk: Identify the seismic risk to the agency’s water facilities and have a plan to address identified risks (see Chapter 8).
• Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP): Update the agency’s plan to include an annual process for assessing potential gaps between planned water supply and demands; conform with the State’s standard water shortage levels (including a shortage level greater than 50 percent) for consistent messaging and reporting; and provide water shortage responses that are locally appropriate (see Chapter 8).
• Lay Description: Provide a lay description of the findings of the UWMP; this Executive Summary serves as the lay description for this plan.

Executive Summary

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
ES-2 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Major components and findings of the City’s 2025 UWMP are summarized below.

CITY OF WOODLAND WATER SYSTEM
The City is located in the Sacramento Valley of California in Yolo County, approximately six miles west of the Sacramento River and 20 miles northwest of the City of Sacramento at the intersection of Interstate 5 and State Route 113. Located within an important agricultural region, the City is completely surrounded by agricultural lands. The City serves drinking water within the current City limits and includes residential, commercial, industrial, institutional/governmental, landscape, and fire service connections.

The City’s water supplies include surface water from the Sacramento River, aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) wells, and standard groundwater wells. The majority of the City’s supplies are treated surface water delivered by the Woodland -Davis Clean Water Agency (WDCWA). WDCWA diverts water from the Sacramento River through an intake facility just no rth of Veteran’s Memorial Bridge and Interstate 5 .

These supplies are treated at the WDCWA Regional Water Treatment Facility (RWTF). The City obtains the rest of its drinking water supplies from ASR wells, which primarily supply stored treated surface water, and intermediate -depth groundwater wells, which draw on native groundwater. The City also has a recycled water system for some non -potable uses. The City’s potable water system consists of two (2) potable groundwater wells, three (3) ASR wells , four (4) standby groundwater wells, and approximately 300 miles of water distribution and transmission pipelines.

WATER USE BY CITY CUSTOMERS
As the City continues to develop, the demand for water will increase. Thorough and accurate accounting of current and future water demands is critical for the City’s planning efforts. To continue delivering safe and reliable drinking water, the City must know how much water its customers currently use and how much they expect to use in the future. The City’s potable water demand is estimated to potentially increase by approximately 0.29 percent per year (from 2025 levels) through 2050 based on anticipated population growth increases from 2025 to 2050 based on the average annual growth rate observed over the past five years. The City’s non-potable water demand is estimated to remain constant through 2050.

CITY OF WOODLAND WATER SUPPLIES
The City’s current potable water supplies include purchased treated surface water from WDCWA conveyed from the Sacramento River and ASR and standard groundwater wells pumped by the City from City-owned and operated wells. The City also uses irrigation wells for non -potable water demands such as landscaping, and recycled water from the City’s Wastewater Pollution Control Facility ( WPCF) for industrial demands at a biomass facility and landscape irrigation demands in City medians.

To reliably meet current and future water demands, the City plans to install a new ASR well within the next five years . In addition, the City will continue to work with WDCWA and support its future projects to ensure long-term availability of surface water supplies. The City plans to continue using groundwater as an emergency supply in the future and plans to maintain and replace groundwater wells as needed to provide a minimum emergency supply capacity. The City’s ASR program will be operated preferentially over the use of the native groundwater blending wells, with the goal of zero groundwater use, when possible.

Executive Summary

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
ES-3 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

CONSERVATION TARGET COMPLIANCE
In its 2015 UWMP, the City confirmed its baseline per capita water use and established and adopted its water use target of 232 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) for 2020. In its 2020 UWMP, the City verified that it achieved its 2020 water use target in accordance with SB X7-7. The City’s per capita water use in 2020 was 155 gpcd, well below the confirmed 2020 water use target of 232 gpcd. This achievement was the result of continued water conservation by the City’s customers.

CITY OF WOODLAND WATER SERVICE RELIABILITY
The CWC asks agencies to evaluate their water service reliability by examining the impact of drought on their water supplies and comparing those reduced supplies to water demands. Specifically, agencies should calculate their water supplies during a single dry year and five consecutive dry years using historical records. The City used 2021 conditions to represent a single dry year and 2016-2020 conditions to represent a five-consecutive-year drought. The City’s surface water reliability is assumed to be consistent with WDCWA’s urban water supply reliability during a single dry year and multiple dry years, as identified in the City’s 2020 UWMP. Local groundwater pumping is assumed to be 100 percent reliable through these hydrologic conditions.

The City is well -positioned to withstand the effects of a single dry year and a five -consecutive dry year drought for any period between 2025 and 20 50, even without additional water conservation measures .

The City’s drought risk was specifically assessed between 2026 and 2030, assuming that the next five years are dry years. In each case, water supplies comfortably meet water demands. The City is able to reliably provide water service whether the drought occurs in 2026, 2050, or any year between.

WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLAN
A WSCP describes an agency’s plan for preparing for and responding to water shortages. The City’s first WSCP was adopted in 2020 and is consistent with the 2018 Water Conservation Legislation requirements.

The City’s 2020 WSCP established a process for assessing potential gaps between planned water supply and demands for the current year and the following (assumed dry) year. In the 2020 WSCP the City included water shortage levels that align with the State’s standard stages. The WSCP may be used for foreseeable and unforeseeable events. The WSCP was adopted in 2021 as a separate document concurrently with the 2020 UWMP, by separate resolution, to allow for updates to be made outside of the UWMP preparation process. The City’s WSCP has been updated in 2026 concurrent with the 2025 UWMP update.

UWMP PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND ADOPTION
The City prepared this 2025 UWMP in coordination with the public. While preparing this plan, the City also notified other stakeholders (e.g., Yolo County and the general public) of its preparation, its availability for review, and the public hearing prior to adoption. The City encouraged community participation in the development of the 2025 UWMP using newspaper advertisements and the City’s website . These public notices included the time and place of the public hearing, as well as where the plan would be available for public inspection. The public hearing provided an opportunity for the City’s water users and the general public to become familiar with the 2025 UWMP, including the WSCP, and ask questions about the City’s plans for continuing to provide reliable, safe, high-quality water and mitigating potential water shortages.

Following the public hearing, the City of Woodland City Council adopted this 2025 UWMP and the associated WSCP Update on MM DD, 2026. A copy of the adopted UWMP, including the WSCP, was submitted to the Department of Water Resources and to the California State Library, and is available on the City’s website: https://www.cityofwoodland.gov/691/Water.

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
1-1 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Introduction
This chapter provides an introduction and overview of the City of Woodland (City) 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) including the importance and extent of the City’s water management planning efforts, changes since the preparation of the City’s 2020 UWMP, and the organization of the City’s 2025 UWMP. This 2025 UWMP has been prepared jointly by City staff and West Yost.

1.1 INTRODUCTION
The Urban Water Management Planning Act (Act) was originally established by Assembly Bill (AB) 797 on September 21, 1983. Passage of the Act was recognition by State legislators that water is a limited resource and a declaration that efficient water use and conservation would be actively pursued throughout the State. The primary objective of the Act is to direct “urban water suppliers” to develop a UWMP which provides a framework for long -term water supply planning, and documents how urban water suppliers a re carrying out their long -term resource planning responsibilities to ensure adequate water supplies are available to meet existing and future water demands. A copy of the current version of the Act, as incorporated in Sections 10608 and Sections 10610 thr ough 10656 of the California Water Code (CWC), is provided in Appendix A of this plan.

1.2 IMPORTANCE AND EXTENT OF CITY’S WATER MANAGEMENT PLANNING

EFFORTS
The purpose of the UWMP is to provide a planning tool for the City for developing and delivering municipal water supplies to the City’s water service area. This UWMP provides the City a water management action plan for guidance as water conditions change and management conditions arise.

The Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) is part of this UWMP and provides a plan for response to various water supply shortage conditions.

The City has had a long history of providing clean and reliable water to its customers. The City’s UWMP is a comprehensive guide for planning for a safe and adequate water supply.

1.3 CHANGES FROM 2020 UWMP
The Urban Water Management Planning Act has been modified over the years in response to the State’s water shortages, droughts and other factors. A significant amendment was made in 2009, after the 2007 to 2009 drought, and as a result of the Governor’s call for a statewide 20 percent reduction in urban water use by the Year 2020. This was the Water Conservation Act of 2009, also known as Senate Bill Seven of the Senate’s Seventh Extraordinary Session of 2009 (SB X7-7). This Act required agencies to establis h water use targets for 2020 that would result in statewide water savings of 20 percent by 2020. The City is required to report compliance with its 2020 water use target in its 2025 UWMP.

The 2012 to 2016 drought has led to further amendments to the CWC to improve on water supply planning for long -term reliability and resilience to drought and climate change. The 2018 Water Conservation Regulation for Making Conservation a California Way of Life (AB 1668 [Friedman] and SB 606 [Hertzberg]) required major additions and changes to the CWC. These changes are associated with managing drought preparedness and water shortage contingency planning for urban water suppliers.

Chapter 1
Introduction

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
1-2 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

No substantive changes to the requirements have been adopted since the completion of the City’s 2020 UWMP. This 2025 UWMP builds on the planning and reporting provided in the City’s 2020 UWMP.

Key updates include:

1. Water Supply Reliability Assessment – a water supply and demand assessment which compares the total water supply sources available to the City with the long-term total projected water use over the next 25 years (to 2050), in five-year increments, for a normal water year, a single dry water year, and a drought lasting five consecutive water years (CWC §10635(a))

2. Drought Risk Assessment – an assessment of the City’s water supply reliability assuming that the Years 2026 to 2030 will be the five dry consecutive years (CWC §10635(b))

3. Water Use Target Compliance – compliance with the City’s previously adopted 2020 per capita water use targets in accordance with SB X7-7 (Water Conservation Act of 2009, SB X7-7; CWC §10608.20)

4. Water Loss Quantification – a summary report quantifying the City’s system water loss for Years 2020 to 2024, and progress toward compliance with the City’s Water Loss Standard as established by the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) (CWC §10631(d)(3)(c))

5. Groundwater Management Compliance – status update on Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) compliance activities (i.e., status of Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) activities and Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) implementation) (CWC §10631(b)(4))
Since the completion of the City’s 2020 UWMP, the State experienced another multi -year (2021 – 2022) drought event during which the City implemented its WSCP. This UWMP includes refinement and updates to the City’s WSCP to incorporate lessons learned from that event.

1.4 PLAN ORGANIZATION
This 2025 UWMP contains the appropriate sections and tables required per CWC Division 6, Part 2.6 (Urban Water Management Planning Act), included in Appendix A of this 2025 UWMP, and has been prepared based on guidance provided by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) in their “2025 Urban Water Management Plans Guidebook for Urban Water Suppliers” (DWR Guidebook).

This 2025 UWMP is organized into the following chapters:
• Chapter 1: Introduction
• Chapter 2: Plan Preparation
• Chapter 3: Service Area Description
• Chapter 4: Water Use Characterization
• Chapter 5: SB X7-7 Baselines, 2020 Targets, and 2025 Reporting • Chapter 6: Normal-Year Water Supply Characterization
• Chapter 7: Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment • Chapter 8: Water Shortage Contingency Plan
• Chapter 9: Demand Management Measures
• Chapter 10: Plan Adoption, Submittal, and Implementation

Chapter 1
Introduction

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
1-3 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

This 2025 UWMP also contains the following appendices of supplemental information and data related to the City’s 2025 UWMP:
• Appendix A: Urban Water Management Planning Act Legislative Requirements • Appendix B: DWR 2025 Urban Water Management Plan Tables • Appendix C: DWR 2025 Urban Water Management Plan Checklist • Appendix D: Agency and Public Notices
• Appendix E: Distribution System Water Loss Audits
• Appendix F: DWR Bulletin 118: Sacramento Groundwater Basin Yolo Subbasin • Appendix G: Water Shortage Contingency Plan
• Appendix H: Municipal Code: Chapter 13.16 and Chapter 13.32 • Appendix I: UWMP and WSCP Adoption Resolutions
Furthermore, this 2025 UWMP contains all the tables recommended in the DWR Guidebook, both embedded into the UWMP chapters where appropriate and included in Appendix B.

DWR’s UWMP Checklist, as provided in the DWR Guidebook, has been completed to demonstrate the plan’s compliance with applicable requirements. A copy of the completed checklist is included in Appendix C.

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
2-1 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

CHAPTER 2
Plan Preparation
This chapter describes the preparation of the City’s 2025 UWMP and WSCP, including the basis for the preparation of the plan, individual or regional planning, fiscal or calendar year reporting, units of measure, and plan coordination and outreach.

2.1 BASIS FOR PREPARING A PLAN
The Act requires every “urban water supplier” to prepare and adopt a UWMP, to periodically review its UWMP at least once every five years and make any amendments or changes which are indicated by the review. The Act also requires every “urban water supplier” to prepare and periodically update its WSCP.

While the WSCP is part of the UWMP, it may be adopted and amended separately from the UWMP. An “urban water supplier” is defined as a supplier, either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually (AFY, or acre-feet per year).

The City manages Water System CA5710006. As shown in Table 2-1, the City provided water to 18,717 customer connections and supplied 11,656 acre-feet (AF) of water in 2025 to retail customers. The City primarily supplies water to retail customers; therefore, the City is required to prepare a UWMP and periodically update its WSCP . The City’s last UWMP, the 2020 UWMP and WSCP were adopted concurrently by separate resolution by the Woodland City Council on June 1, 2021.

Table 2-1. Retail: Public Water Systems (DWR Table 2-1)

2.2 REGIONAL PLANNING
As described in Section 2.3, the City has prepared this 20 25 UWMP on an individual reporting basis, not part of a regional planning process.

2.3 INDIVIDUAL OR REGIONAL PLANNING AND COMPLIANCE
This 2025 UWMP has been prepared on an individual reporting basis covering only the City’s service area, as shown in Table 2-2. The City is a member and participant in several regional groups that do water planning in the region. These groups include the Westside Sacramento River Integrated Regional Water Management Group, the Water Resources Association of Yolo County, the Woodland Davis Clean Water Agency (WDCWA), and the Yolo Subbasin Groundwater Agency. Although the City is closely involved with each of these regional organizations, the City has opted to not pursue a Regional Urban Water Management Plan (RUWMP) with any of these entities at this time. As described in Section 2.5, the City has notified and coordinated planning and compliance with appropriate regional agencies and constituents.

CA5710006 City of Woodland 18,717 11,656
18,717 11,656
Add additional rows as needed
Volume of Water
Supplied 2025 (AF)
DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

Total
Public Water System
Number
Public Water System
Name
Number of Municipal
Connections 2025

Chapter 2
Plan Preparation

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
2-2 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 2-2. Plan Identification (DWR Table 2-2)

2.4 FISCAL OR CALENDAR YEAR AND UNITS OF MEASURE
The City is a water retailer.

The City’s 2025 UWMP has been prepared on a calendar year basis, with the calendar year starting on January 1 and ending on December 31 of each year. Water use and planning data for the entire Calendar Year 2025 has been included.

The water volumes in this 2025 UWMP are reported in units of AF.

The City’s reporting methods for this 2025 UWMP are summarized in Table 2-3.

Table 2-3. Supplier Identification (DWR Table 2-3)

Select
One
Name of Regional Alliance or
RUWMP (Drop Down List)Type of Plan
Individual UWMP
If Water Supplier is also a member of a SB X7-7
Regional Alliance, select name from the drop-
down.

Regional Urban Water Management Plan (RUWMP)
If Supplier selected RUWMP, select name from
the drop-down.

Supplier is a wholesale supplier
Supplier is a retail supplier
UWMP Tables are in calendar years
UWMP Tables are in fiscal years
Unit AF
Type of Supplier (select one or both)
Fiscal or Calendar Year (select one)
If using fiscal years provide month and date that the fiscal year begins (mm/dd)
Units of measure used in UWMP
(Select from the drop down list).

DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent
throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

Chapter 2
Plan Preparation

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
2-3 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

2.5 COORDINATION AND OUTREACH
This section includes a discussion of the City’s inter-agency coordination and coordination with the general public. The UWMP Act requires the City to coordinate the preparation of its UWMP and WSCP with other appropriate agencies and all departments within the City, including other water suppliers that share a common source, water management agencies, and relevant public agencies. These agencies, as well as the public, participated in the coordination and preparation of this 2025 UWMP, including the WSCP, and are summarized in the sections that follow.

2.5.1 Wholesale and Retail Coordination
The City is a water retailer and receives wholesale water from WDCWA. In accordance with CWC § 10631, the City has informed WDCWA of projected water use for that source in five -year increments through 2050, as shown in Table 2-4. WDCWA provided information to the City, identifying and quantifying water supplies available for the same period, under normal water year, single dry year, and five consecutive dry year hydrological conditions.

Table 2-4. Retail: Water Supplier Information Exchange (DWR Table 2-4R)

2.5.2 Coordination with Other Agencies and the Community The City actively encourages community participation in water management activities and specific water-related projects. The City’s public participation program includes both active and passive means of obtaining input from the community, such as mailings, public meetings, and web -based communication.

The City’s website describes on -going projects and posts announcements of planned rate increases to fund these water projects.

As part of the 2025 UWMP and WSCP update, the City facilitated a public review period. Public noticing, pursuant to Section 6066 of the Government Code, was conducted prior to commencement of this public comment period. Public hearing notices are included in Appendix D of this plan. During the public comment period, the Draft UWMP and Draft WSCP were made available on the City’s website.

The City also coordinated the preparation of its UWMP and WSCP with several agencies, including relevant public agencies that utilize the same water supplies. These agencies include the following:
• City of Woodland
• County of Yolo
• City of Davis
• City of West Sacramento
• Reclamation District 2035
The retail Supplier has informed the following wholesale supplier(s) of projected water use.

Wholesale Water Supplier Name
Add additional rows as needed
Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency

Chapter 2
Plan Preparation

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
2-4 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

• University of California, Davis
• Westside Sacramento River IRWM Group
• Woodland Chamber of Commerce
• WDCWA
• Yolo County Farm Bureau
• Yolo County Flood Control & Water Conservation District • Yolo Subbasin Groundwater Agency
The public hearing provided an opportunity for all City water users and the general public to become familiar with the UWMP, including the WSCP, and ask questions about the City’s water supply, in addition to the City’s continuing plans for providing a reliable, safe, high-quality water supply.

2.5.3 Notice to Cities and Counties
CWC § 10621 (b) requires agencies to notify the cities and counties to which they serve water at leas t 60 days in advance of the public hearing that the plan is being updated and reviewed. On January 23, 2026, a notice of preparation was sent to the cities and counties and other stakeholders, to inform them of the UWMP update process and schedule , and to solicit input for the 2025 UWMP and WSCP . The notifications to cities and counties, the public hearing notifications, and the public hearing and adoption are discussed in Chapter 10 of this report.

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
3-1 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

CHAPTER 3
Service Area Description
This chapter provides a description of the City’s water system and service area, including the water system facilities, climate, population, and housing within the City’s water service area.

3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The City is located in the Sacramento Valley of California in Yolo County, approximately six miles west of the Sacramento River and 20 miles northwest of Sacramento. The City occupies 14.5 square miles and is completely surrounded by agricultural lands. State Route 113 crosses through the middle of City limits.

Interstate 5 runs diagonally from east to northwest through the City. The location of the City is shown on Figure 3-1.

The City’s water supply source consists primarily of treated surface water purchased from WDCWA. The City also maintains groundwater supplies as a backup to the surface water supplies. The City has six (6) potable groundwater wells, including two (2) active blending wells and four (4) standby wells. The City’s potable groundwater wells are affected by hexavalent chromium. The City also owns three (3) aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) wells. The City maintains approximately 300 miles of water distribution and transmission pipelines.

3.2 SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY
The City’s water service area is contiguous with current City limits, and includes residential, commercial, industrial, and fire service connections. The City’s water service area boundary is shown on Figure 3-1.

3.3 SERVICE AREA CLIMATE
The City has a Mediterranean climate characterized by hot, dry summers and cool, rainy winters, with an annual average precipitation of approximately 18. 5 inches. The climate ranges from summer temperatures occasionally exceeding 100 degrees Fahrenheit (°F), and winter temperatures dropping into the 30°F range. Based on historical data, the City’s average monthly temperatures are as low as 37°F and as high as 96°F.

Water use within the City’s service area is dependent on various climate factors such as temperature, precipitation, and evapotranspiration (ET). Climate data, including temperature and precipitation estimates, were obtained for the City from the Western Regional Climate Center and the California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS).

ET describes the combined water lost through evaporation from the soil and surface water bodies and plant transpiration. In general, the ET is given for turf grass and then corrected for a specific crop type.

Local ET data was obtained from the CIMIS monitoring station within the City (Station #226). The historical climate characteristics affecting water management in the City’s water service areas is shown in Table 3-1.

COUNTY ROAD 18C
COUNTY ROAD 99
COUNTY ROAD 99
COUNTY ROAD 98
COUNTY ROAD 102
COUNTY ROAD 97
COUNTY ROAD 98B
COUNTY ROAD 22
COUNTY ROAD 97A
COUNTY ROAD 20
COUNTY ROAD 102
COUNTY ROAD 25A
COUNTY ROAD 97E
COUNTY ROAD 24
COUNTY ROAD 103
COUNTY ROAD 18B
COUNTY ROAD 99E
C O U N T Y R O A D 2 5
COUNTY ROAD 20
COUNTY ROAD 19B
COUNTY ROAD 100A
COUNTY ROAD 100B
COUNTY ROAD 18B
COUNTY ROAD 19A
COUNTY ROAD 101
C O U N T Y R O A D 2 4
COUNTY ROAD 24A
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
O
A
D
1 0
1 MAIN ST MAIN ST

MAIN ST MAIN ST

LINCOLN AVE

COLLEGE ST

BOURN DR

THIRD ST

ROSE LN

PIONEER AVE

PIONEER AVE

EAST ST

EAST ST

EAST ST

EAST ST
F
A
R
N
H
A
M
A
V
E

BEAMER ST BEAMER ST BEAMER ST

MATMOR RD

CALIFORNIA ST

CROSS ST

GIBSON RD

GIBSON RD GIBSON RD

GUM AVE

WOODLAND AVE

KENTUCKY AVE KENTUCKY AVE

ASHLEY AVE

COTTONWOOD ST

WEST ST

WEST ST
C
O
L
O
M
A
W
A
Y

COURT ST

BRANIGAN AVE

E L D O R A D O D R

F A R M E R S C E N T R A L R D

HARRY LORENZO AVE
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
S
T

L E M E N A V E

HERITAGE PKWY

P A R K L
A
N
D
A
V
E

COIL LN

BEST RANCH RD
5 5
5 ¬«
113
¬«
113
¬«
113
¬«
16 Modesto
Hayward
Roseville
San Jose
San Francisco
Santa Rosa
Oakland
Stockton
Sacramento
Notes:

1. The City serves water to the entire area
encompassed by its City Limits
(includes residential, commercial,
industrial, and fire use).

City Limits
Urban Limit Line
Figure 3-1
City of Woodland
Water Service Area0 0.5 1
MilesN
City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water
Management Plan
Prepared for:

Prepared by:

Fig 3-1. Water Service Area: N:\Clients\204 Woodland\60-25-68 2025 UWMP\GIS\PRO\Woodland 2025 UWMP v2.aprx - mmar - 12/31/2025

Chapter 3
Service Area Description

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
3-3 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 3-1. Monthly Average Climate Data Summary
Month
Standard Monthly
Average ET, inches(a)
Average Total
Rainfall, inches(b)
Average Temperature, degrees
Fahrenheit(b)
Minimum Maximum
City of Woodland (CIMIS Station No. 226)
January 1.5 4.0 37.8 54.6
February 2.6 3.4 40.9 60.9
March 3.8 2.5 43.8 66.8
April 5.7 1.2 46.8 74.0
May 7.4 0.5 51.8 82.5
June 8.1 0.2 56.5 90.5
July 8.2 0.0 58.1 96.2
August 7.2 0.0 56.9 94.9
September 5.6 0.3 55.6 90.0
October 4.1 0.9 50.0 79.4
November 2.1 2.0 42.7 65.2
December 1.4 3.4 38.1 55.2
Total 57.6 18.5 - -
Source: California Irrigation Management Information System and Western Regional Climate Center. (a) California Irrigation Management Information System (https://cimis.water.ca.gov/) for Station #226. Period of record is May 12, 2011 to August 31, 2025. Data accessed September 18, 2025.
(b) Western Regional Climate Center (https://wrcc.dri.edu/) data for Woodland 1 WNW (Station 049781). Period of record is 1906 to 2024.

Data accessed September 18, 2025.

These climate characteristics highly influence the City’s water use. As described in Chapter 4, the City’s water use in the summer months is significantly higher than that in the winter, reflecting increased water use for irrigation purposes during the hot, dry summers.

3.4 SERVICE AREA POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS

3.4.1 Service Area Population
Because the City’s water service area aligns with current City limits, the City’s water service area population for 2025 was estimated using population data for the City of Woodland published by the California Department of Finance (DOF), which was benchmarked based on the 2020 Census. 1 The City’s 2025 service area population was approximately 61,623.

1 State of California Department of Finance (DOF). May 2025. E-4 Population Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2021-2025 with 2020 Census Benchmark. Accessed at https://dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/ on October 7, 2025.

Chapter 3
Service Area Description

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
3-4 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Land use planning within the City is undertaken by the Planning Division of the City’s Community Development Department. In 2017, the City adopted a comprehensive update of its General Plan – the General Plan Update 2035. The General Plan Update 2035 provides guidelines for the City on how development will occur in the future. The City’s population projections used in the UWMP are based on DOF population data for 2020 and 2025. These projections represent an anticipated average annual growth rate of 0 .29 percent per year. The City’s current and projected populations for its water service area are shown in Table 3-2 (DWR Table 3-1R). Figure 3-1 shows the City’s approved urban limit line used in the General Plan Update 2035.

Table 3-2. Wholesale. Retail. Population – Current and Projected (DWR Table 3-1R)

3.4.2 Other Social, Economic, and Demographic Factors
The State requires the inclusion of service area socioeconomic information as part of the system description in UWMPs. However, differences in household water use across sociodemographic groups in the City have not been studied. Therefore, the following social, economic, and demographic information is being provided to comply with the new regulation. The information was derived from the US Census Bureau’s profile of the City of Woodland for 2019-2023.2 • The average number of people per household was 2.85.
• The median household income in 2024 was $87,679, while 8.1 percent of all individuals and

8.6 percent of youth under the age of 18 lived in poverty. • The average unemployment rate was 5.3 percent.
• The owner-occupied housing unit rate was 66.4 percent. • The median gross rent was $1,724 per month.
• The median age was 38.7 years.
• Of persons 25 years or older in 2024, 84.4 percent had earned at least a high school diploma or equivalent and 30.2 percent had earned a bachelor’s degree or higher. • Of persons under 65 years of age, 9.2 percent had a disability and 6.7 percent did not have health insurance.
• Almost 93 percent of households had one or more type of computer, and 90.6 percent had a broadband internet subscription.

2 United States Census Bureau. American Community Survey, 2025: ACS 5-Year Estimates Data Profiles for Woodland City, California. Accessed at https://data.census.gov/profile/Woodland_city,_California?g=160XX00US0686328 on December 30, 2025.
2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050(opt)
61,623 62,517 63,424 64,343 65,277 66,223
Population
Served
NOTES:

1. 2025 population is obtained from the Department of Finance.

2. Future year populations were extrapolated based on a 0.29 percent growth rate calculated between the 2020 actual population (60,472) and 2025 actual population.

Chapter 3
Service Area Description

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
3-5 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

• By race/ethnicity, 52.4 percent of people were White, 2.2 percent were Black, 1.1 percent were American Indian or Alaska Native, 8.0 percent were Asian, 0.7 percent were Hawaiian Native or Pacific Islander, 21.3 percent were two or more races, and 14.3 percent were some other races.
• Of the total City population, 49.7 percent were Hispanic or Latino and 50.3 were not Hispanic or Latino.
• Approximately 21.7 percent of Woodland residents were foreign born, and 40.0 percent of people ages five years and older spoke a language other than English at home.

3.5 LAND USES WITHIN SERVICE AREA
This section describes the City’s current and projected land uses in its water service area. Information for this section is based on the City’s General Plan Update 2035, which was adopted in 2017.

3.5.1 Current Land Uses
The City’s current land use is majority residential neighborhoods with commercial and employment centers to the north. Smaller land uses include green space and mixed-use corridors.

3.5.2 Projected Land Uses
According to the City’s General Plan Update 2035, there are three new growth areas: Specific Plan 1 (SP-1), Specific Plan 2 (SP-2), and Specific Plan 3 (SP -3). Renewable energy sources and water conservation will be encouraged in all three growth areas. SP -1, located in the south of the City , is divided into three sub-areas: SP-1A, SP-1B, and SP -1C. SP-1A and SP -1B will be developed into mixed -use neighborhoods, while SP-1C will be residential -only. Existing infrastructure within SP -1 will be resized to accommodate the development. SP-2 is located in the east of the City and will be a mixed-use neighborhood with a town center. SP-3 is located in the northwest of the City and is divided into two sub -areas: SP-3A and SP-3B.

SP-3A will be mixed-use, while SP-3B will be mostly industrial.

For the purposes of this UWMP, it is assumed that SP-1A, SP-1B, SP-1C, and SP-3 will be developed within the time frame evaluated under this UWMP (i.e., developed by 2050) . Due to its location within the floodplain, SP-2 is no longer planned to be developed.

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
4-1 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

CHAPTER 4
Water Use Characterization
This chapter describes and quantifies the City’s historical, current, and projected water uses . Water demand projections are based on the projected growth within the City’s water service area.

4.1 NON-POTABLE VERSUS POTABLE WATER USE
Potable water is water that is safe to drink and has had various levels of treatment and/or disinfection.

The City currently provides only treated potable water to most of its customers within its water service area from City-owned and operated groundwater wells and surface water purchased from WDCWA.

Recycled water is municipal wastewater that has been treated to a specified quality for beneficial reuse.

The City implemented a recycled water program in 2017 to ease demand on potable water within its water service area fo r uses that do not require a drinking level standard of water . Further discussion of the recycled water program can be found in Chapter 6.

Raw water is non-potable, untreated water that is used in its natural state or with minimal treatment. The City does not deliver raw water to any customers in its service area. However, the City irrigates one park using raw water . The City also plans to modify an existing inactive agricultural well to irrigate a future sports park. The sports park is expected to be developed in 2027.

Potable water demands are discussed below.

4.2 WATER USE BY SECTOR
This section describes the City’s past, current, and projected water use by water use sector, as listed in CWC §10631(d) and defined in the DWR Guidebook. These classifications were used to analyze current consumption patterns among the various types of City water customers. Each water use sector is listed and defined below.
• Single Family Residential: A single-family dwelling unit. A lot with a free-standing building containing one dwelling unit that may include a detached secondary dwelling. • Multi-Family Residential: Multiple dwelling units contained within one building or several buildings within one complex.
• Commercial: A water user that provides or distributes a product or service (CWC § 10608.12(f)).
• Industrial: A water user that is primarily a manufacturer or processor of materials as defined by the North American Industry Classification System code sectors 31 to 33, inclusive, or an entity that is a water user primarily engaged in research and development (CWC § 10608.12(p)).
• Institutional/Governmental: A water user dedicated to public service. This type of user includes, among other users, higher education institutions, schools, courts, churches, hospitals, government facilities, and nonprofit research institutions (CWC § 10608.12(q)). • Landscape: Water connections supplying water solely for landscape irrigation. Such landscapes may be associated with multi-family, commercial, industrial, or institutional/governmental sites, but are considered a separate water use sector if the connection is solely for landscape irrigation.

Chapter 4
Water Use Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
4-2 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

• Other: Any other water demand that is not adequately described by the water sectors defined above, including fire flows and construction water. System water losses are not to be reported in the “Other” category.

The City does not have any current plans to use water for saline water intrusion barriers, agricultural irrigation, wetlands, or wildlife habitat.

4.2.1 Historical Potable Water Use
Past potable water demand by water use sector for 2020 through 2024 is shown in Table 4-1. The 2020 values were reported in the City’s 2020 UWMP. The 2021-2024 data is from the City’s consumption records. Losses are based on annual ly submitted American Water Works Association (AWWA) audit worksheets and discussed in greater detail in Section 4.3. The City was fully metered for the years shown in Table 4-1.

Table 4-1. Historical Potable Water Demand by Water Use Sector, AF Water Use Sector 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Single-Family 4,860 4,644 4,320 4,284 4,568
Multi-Family 1,381 1,345 1,155 1,135 1,176
Commercial(a) 1,647 1,589 1,526 1,338 1,112
Industrial 170 216 849 171 235
Landscape 859 822 780 62 414
Other Non-Residential(b) 0 0 0 798 982
Groundwater Recharge(c) 332 560 1,206 1,666 611
Losses(d) 1,041 1,282 1,277 1,298 1,270
Total(e) 10,290 10,456 11,114 10,753 10,368
(a) "Commercial" use includes institutional water use consistent with the City's Electronic Annual Report. (b) “Other Non-Residential” use includes water use for preventative maintenance, water quality testing, City work orders, and commercial and industrial landscaping.
(c) “Groundwater Recharge” use includes long-term storage (i.e., water used for groundwater recharge but not retrieved during the same year). Short-term storage (i.e., water placed into groundwater that is subsequently pumped out of the basin during the same year) is not included in this calculation and this water is reported with the end use category. (d) Losses are based on annual AWWA Audit Worksheets.
(e) Totals may not sum due to rounding.

4.2.2 Current Water Use
Water demand by sector for the Year 2025 is reported in Table 4-2 (DWR Table 4-1R). As shown, the City’s water was primarily treated to potable water standards , with a smaller portion treated to tertiary standards for energy production and landscape irrigation uses. The City did not supply water to wholesale customers in 2025 and has no plans to do so in the future. The total potable water demand for 2025 was 11,163 AF, including system losses.

Chapter 4
Water Use Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
4-3 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 4-2. Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water – 2025 (DWR Table 4-1R)

4.2.3 Projected Water Use
The City’s potable and non -potable water demand projections for 2030 through 2050 ( i.e., a 25 -year planning horizon) are reported in Table 4-3 (DWR Table 4-2R). Projected future potable water demands are based on anticipated population growth increases from 20 25 to 2050 which is calculated to be

0.29 percent per year. The total 2050 projected potable water demand is 11,996 AF. Given that the City is dominated by residential and commercial water use, the rate of City population growth is a good measure for assessing future water use.

The projected water use by the City’s customers is based on the best available information. The City tracked actual water use by sector in 2025 through its metering program. It is expected that the distribution of water, by water user type , will not change significantly in the future and, therefore, the percentage of each customer classification that existed in 2025 was assumed to remain constant through 2050. To remain consistent with the City’s Electronic Annual Report submittals to the State Water Board, institutional uses are included with commercial demand projections.

Non-potable water demands are assumed to remain constant through 2050 as the City does not currently have plans to expand its non-potable water system.

Use Type
Drop down list
May select each use multiple times
These are the only use types that will be recognized by the WUEdata online submittal tool
Potable or Non-Potable
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Volume (AF)
Single Family Potable 4,526
Multi-Family Potable 1,123
Commercial Potable 1,207
Industrial Potable 304
Institutional/Governmental Potable 542
Landscape Potable 840
Groundwater recharge Potable 1,145
Distribution System Water Loss Unauthorized and Unmetered Water Losses Potable 1,476
Landscape Raw Water from Agricultural
Irrigation Well Non-Potable 16
Landscape Recycled Water Non-Potable 52
Industrial Recycled Water Non-Potable 320
Commercial Recycled Water Non-Potable 87
Institutional/Governmental Recycled Water Non-Potable 28 Distribution System Water Loss Recycled Water Non-Potable 6 11,163
509
11,672Total
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3. 2025 Actual Water Use
Add additional rows as needed
Subtotal Potable
Subtotal Non-Potable
Additional Description
(as needed)

Chapter 4
Water Use Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
4-4 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Refer to Chapter 6 for a discussion of the City’s recycled water system and recycled water demand projections.

Table 4-3. Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water – Projected (DWR Table 4-2R)

4.2.4 Characteristic Five-Year Water Use
CWC 10635(b) requires urban suppliers to include a five -year drought risk assessment (DRA) in their UWMP. A key component of the DRA is estimating water demands for the next five years (2026 -2030) without drought conditions ( i.e., unconstrained demand). Chapter 7 details the DRA, but the five -year demand projections are summarized in Table 4-4. Projected water demands for 2026 through 2029 were estimated as a linear interpolation between the actual 2025 consumption by use type, reported in Table 4-2 (DWR Table 4-1R), and the 2030 projected water use, reported in Table 4-3 (DWR Table 4-2R).

Use Type
Drop down list
May select each use multiple times
These are the only Use Types that will be
recognized by the WUEdata online submittal tool
Potable or Non-Potable
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
2030 (AF) 2035 (AF) 2040 (AF) 2045 (AF) 2050 opt (AF)
Single Family Potable 4,592 4,659 4,726 4,795 4,864
Multi-Family Potable 1,139 1,156 1,173 1,190 1,207
Commercial Potable 1,224 1,242 1,260 1,279 1,297
Industrial Potable 308 312 317 322 326
Institutional/Governmental Potable 550 558 566 574 583
Landscape Potable 852 864 877 889 902
Groundwater recharge Potable 1,162 1,179 1,196 1,213 1,231 Distribution System Water Loss Potable 1,497 1,519 1,541 1,563 1,586 Landscape Raw Water from Agricultural
Wells 1 Non-Potable 16 16 16 16 16
Landscape Recycled Water Non-Potable 52 52 52 52 52
Industrial Recycled Water Non-Potable 320 320 320 320 320 Commercial Recycled Water Non-Potable 87 87 87 87 87
Institutional/Governmental Recycled Water Non-Potable 28 28 28 28 28 Distribution System Water Loss Recycled Water Non-Potable 6 6 6 6 6 11,325 11,489 11,656 11,825 11,996
509 509 509 509 509
11,834 11,998 12,165 12,334 12,506
Subtotal Potable
NOTES:

1. City well water from agricultural irrigation wells is planned to increase due to modifications to an existing inactive well for irrigation of a planned sports park. Exact water use estimates are currently unavailable but the increase will likely be nominal.

Total
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

Subtotal Non-Potable
Add additional rows as needed.

Projected Water Use
(Report To the Extent that Records are Available)
Additional Description
(as needed)

Chapter 4
Water Use Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
4-5 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 4-4. Projected Five-Year Potable Water Use for Retail Customers, AF Water Use Sector 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Single-Family 4,539 4,553 4,566 4,579 4,592
Multi-Family 1,126 1,130 1,133 1,136 1,139
Commercial(a) 1,754 1,759 1,764 1,769 1,775
Industrial 305 305 306 307 308
Landscape 842 845 847 849 852
Groundwater Recharge(b) 1,148 1,152 1,155 1,158 1,162
Losses 1,480 1,484 1,489 1,493 1,497
Total 11,195 11,228 11,260 11,293 11,325
(a) Commercial water use includes institutional water use, consistent with the City's annual water reporting. (b) “Groundwater recharge” use includes long-term storage (i.e., water used for groundwater recharge but not retrieved during the same year). Short-term storage (i.e., water placed into groundwater that is subsequently pumped out of the basin during the same year) is not included in this calculation and this water is reported with the end use category.

4.2.5 Estimating Future Water Savings
The water use projections presented in Table 4-4 are based on population projections within the City’s water service area. In accordance with the City’s General Plan Update 2035 and its 2017 Climate Action Plan (CAP), water conservation is encouraged within the City. Urban water suppliers may consider the passive savings from codes, standards, ordinances, or transportation and land use plans. Such water savings decrease the water use projections for new and future customers compared to historical customers. As indicated in Table 4-5 (DWR Table 4 -3R), these potential passive savings have no t been included in the City’s water demand projections to be conservative.

Table 4-5. Inclusion in Water Use Projections (DWR Table 4-3R)

Are Future Water Savings Included in Projections?
Drop down list (y/n) No
If "Yes" to above, state the section or page number, in the cell to the right, where citations of the codes, ordinances, or otherwise are utilized in demand projections are found.

Optional Suppliers may complete Optional Submittal Table 4-4 R to quantify the expected savings.

Are Lower Income Residential Demands Included In Projections? Drop down list (y/n) Yes
Optional If the method for accounting Lower Income Residential Demands has been included, provide page number where this accounting can be found.

Chapter 4
Water Use Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
4-6 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

4.2.6 Water Use for Lower Income Households
This UWMP considers current adopted codes, plans, and other policies or laws to estimate water savings projections. As indicated in Table 4‑5 (DWR Table 4-3R), projected water use for lower income households in the City’s water service area are included in the City’s water use projections.

A lower income household is considered to be a household with an income below 80 percent of an area’s median income, adjusted for family size. Projected water demands for low er income, single family, and multi-family residential water uses are included in the total water demands described in Section 4.2.2.

The City is a member of the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) and participates in the Regional Housing Needs Plan (RHNP) which allocates participating cities and counties their “fair share” of the region’s projected housing needs. The RHNP is updated every five years and provides the housing units that a city or county must plan for within a 7.5 -year time period. The SACOG 2021-2029 RHNP was adopted on March 19, 2020. This information is used by cities and counties to update their General Plan Housing Elements.

The City adopted its 6 th Cycle 2021 -2029 Housing Element Update on March 21, 2023. The City’s 6 th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element Update includes the number of existing lower income households and indicates that approximately 35 percent of the City’s households are Low Income (13 percent), Very-Low Income ( 11 percent), or Extremely -Low Income ( 11 percent ). The City assumes that lower income households will continue to represent approximately 35 percent of the City’s total residential customers through 2050 but recognizes that the percentage of lower income households in the City could change as demographic changes occur. With this percentage assumption, the projected water demand from lower income households will be approximately 2,125 AFY of residential water use by 2050.

4.3 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WATER LOSSES
System losses are the difference between the actual volume of water treated and delivered into the distribution system and the actual metered consumption, subtracting unmetered authorized use such as flushing for water quality . S ome apparent losses are always present in a water system due to faulty meters, unmetered services such as fire protection and training, and system and street flushing. Real losses stem from sources including service line leaks, water main breaks, and unauthorized connections.

The City uses the AWWA Water Audits and Loss Control Programs method to annually evaluate its distribution system losses. The water audit is an accounting exercise that tracks all sources and uses of water within a water system over a calendar year.

Table 4-6 (DWR Table 4-5R) summarizes the water system losses as reported in the AWWA water audits for the last five years starting in January 2020. Copies of the City’s water audit worksheets for the last five years are provided in Appendix E.

Chapter 4
Water Use Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
4-7 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 4-6. Last Five Years of Water Loss Audit Reporting (DWR Table 4-5R)

In November 2022, DWR and the State Water Board adopted water loss standards for urban retail water suppliers. The new regulation provides suppliers with volumetric standards that establish cost -effective levels of achievable water loss based on each supplier’s water system characteristics and budgets.

Beginning in January 2028, suppliers must meet their individual volumetric real loss standards based on a three-year compliance period of the Years 2025, 2026, and 2027. Individual apparent water loss standards must also be met at the same 2028 compliance date. Table 4-7 (DWR Table 4-6R) summarizes the real and apparent water losses for 2025 compared to the City’s 2028 water loss standard. The City’s water loss is below its standard for both real water loss and apparent water loss.

The City’s programs to assess and manage water loss are discussed further in Chapter 9.

Public Water System ID #
Reported in Table 2-1 R Reporting Period
Submitted to DWR Water
Loss Audit Program
(yes/no)
2020 Yes
2021 Yes
2022 Yes
2023 Yes
2024 Yes
CA5710006
Report submittal status for all five years for each Public Water System as available.

Add rows as needed

Chapter 4
Water Use Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
4-8 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 4-7. Progress Towards 2028 Water Loss Standard (DWR Table 4-6R)

2028 Real Water Loss
Standard per Unit per
day
Units for Real
Water Loss
Drop down list
Number of Units
(Connections or Miles
corresponding with
units selected)
Volume of Total Real
Loss
(from AWWA Water
Loss Audit)
(AF)
2028 Apparent Water
Loss Standard per
Unit per Day
Units for
Apparent Water
Loss
Number of
Connections
Volume of Total
Apparent Loss
(from AWWA Water
Loss Audit)
(AF)
CA5710006 Yes 41.9
Gallons per
Service
Connection per
Day (GPSCD)
18,187 844.6 41.5 8.2
Gallons per
Service
Connection per
Day (GPSCD)
18,187 428.4 21.0
Submittal Table 4-6 Retail: Progress Towards 2028 Water Loss Standard Water Code Section 10631(d)(3)(C)
Apparent Water Loss
Did the Water Board Calculate a
Water Loss Standard for this
Public Water System? (y/n)
If no, Supplier will not complete
this row.

Real Water Loss
Water Board's Calculated Water Loss Standards
Public Water
System ID #
Reported in
Submittal Table 2-1
R
Add additional rows as needed.

Most Recent AWWA Water Loss Audit
Real Water
Loss Per Unit
per Day
Most Recent AWWA Water Loss Audit
Apparent Water
Loss Per Unit per
Day
State Water Board Standard State Water Board Standard

Chapter 4
Water Use Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
4-9 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

4.4 CLIMATE CHANGE CONSIDERATIONS
Climate change has the potential to alter local climatic patterns and meteorology. A CAP was adopted by the City in 2017 and a Climate Action & Adaptation Plan (CAAP) was adopted by Yolo County in 2024 to identify strategies and actions to adapt to the effects of climate change. Some examples of these actions related to water include implementing water conservation measures and maximizing the beneficial uses of recycled water.

Regarding the potential future impacts of climate change on northern California water supplies, the following climatological and hydrologic effects are likely:

Warmer winters resulting in increased runoff during the winter months (due to precipitation in the mountains being more likely to fall as rain versus snow), with a commensurate decrease in snowpack and springtime snowmelt.

Longer, more frequent, and more severe periods of drought.

Greater risk of wildfires, resulting in decreased forestation.

Greater storm intensities.

Greater variation in hydrologic conditions from year to year.

The City’s future water demand and use patterns may be impacted by climate change. Warmer temperatures are expected to increase landscape irrigation demand. In addition, climate change may increase the frequency and intensity of wildfires, which would incr ease water demands for firefighting.

According to the Yolo County CAAP, climate change impacts anticipated for Yolo County include:

Increased frequency and intensity of drought, resulting in depletion of surface water supplies and subsequently greater dependence on groundwater; and Increased frequency of extreme heat events, resulting in increased water demands.

Over 80 percent of the land in Yolo County is agricultural, highlighting the importance of water management in Yolo County in light of anticipated impacts from climate change.

The water demand projections included in this 2025 UWMP reflect anticipated increases in demands.

Current and ongoing water use efficiencies and water conservation by the City’s water customers, discussed in Chapter 9, and use of recycled water , discussed in Chapter 6, could mitigate the effects of climate change on water demands.

Since the City purchases and imports surface water from WDCWA, the most tangible effect of climate change hydrology is likely to be the timing and frequency at which the State Water Board imposes Term 91 curtailments, during which surface water diversions under WDCWA’s primary water right are prohibited.

WDCWA’s secondary water rights are not subject to Term 91 curtailments, but are subject to Lake Shasta critical year reductions, where the Lake Shasta designations for any given year are established by the U.S.

Bureau of Reclamation (USBR). As further discussed in Chapter 6, the possible Lake Shasta critical years and likely imposable periods of Term 91 will increase in the future due to longer periods of drought. This increase was estimated and taken into consideration when projecting surf ace water supply availability from the Davis Woodland Water Supply Project (DWWSP).

Chapter 4
Water Use Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
4-10 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

In Yolo Subbasin Groundwater Agency (YSGA)’s Adopted 2022 GSP, YSGA noted potential climate change impacts to groundwater resources such as:
• Decreased reliability of surface water supplies could lead to increased reliance on groundwater, further stressing such supplies.
• Changes to surface water hydrology – increased winter flood flows, reduced spring and summer snowmelt runoff – could decrease groundwater recharge. • Increased landscape and irrigation water demands due to increased temperatures could further increase pressures on groundwater supplies.

The implementation of WDCWA’s DWWSP in 2016, along with the ASR conjunctive use program are adaptations to climate change that the City has implemented over the past decade to avoid the potential adverse effects from climate change listed above on the City’s groundwater supply. By adding surface water as a primary drinking water source, the City diversified its water supply portfolio which provide s flexibility to the City for adjusting to changing weather and hydrology resulting from climate change. The City’s ASR program offers flexibility for the City to use and bank surface water when it’s plentiful and use recovered ASR water when surface water is not available.

The City continues to evaluate methodologies to correlate climate change impacts to water demands within its service area and will incorporate climate change impacts on demands in future UWMPs.

The potential impacts of climate change on the City’s water supplies are described in Chapter 6.

Chapter
4 Water Use Characterization

N
-
C
-
204
-
60 -
25 -
68 -
WP

4 -
11 City of Woodland

2025 Urban Water Management Plan

May

2026

4.5 REFERENCES

California Office of
Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
. November 2022. Indicators of Climate Change in
California Report Summary.

https://oehha.ca.gov/sites/default/files/media/downloads/climate -
change/document/00csummary.pdf

Accessed on
January 13
, 202
6 .

City of Woodland. March 2023. 6
th

Cycle Housing Element

2021
-
2029
.

https://www.cityofwoodland.gov/1296/Housing
-
Element
-
Update
-
2021

Accessed on October 9, 2025.

City of Woodland. May 2017. Climate Action Plan.

https://www.cityofwoodland.gov/444/Climate
-
Action
-
Plan

Accessed
on February 25, 2026.

County of Yolo. December 2024.

Yolo County
2030 Climate
Action & Adaptation Plan.

https://www.yolocounty.gov/government/general
-
government
-
departments/community
-
services/2030
-
caap

Accessed on
February 4, 2026.

GEI Consultants, Inc.

January 2022
. Basin Setting of Groundwater Sustainability Plan
.
https://www.yologroundwater.org/files/acff83c75/YoloGSP_Adopted.pdf

Accessed on
January 13, 2026
.

Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG).

March 2020
.

SACOG
Regional Housing Needs Plan 20
21 -
202
9 .
https://www.sacog.org/planning/land
-
use/housing/regional
-
housing
-
needs
-
allocation
-
rhna

Accessed on
January 13, 2026
.

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
5-1 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

CHAPTER 5
SB X7-7 Baselines, 2020 Target, and 2025 Reporting
In November 2009, SB X7-7, the Water Conservation Act of 2009, was signed into law as part of a comprehensive water legislation package. The Water Conservation Act addressed both urban and agricultural water conservation. The legislation set a goal of achi eving a 20 percent statewide reduction in urban per capita water use by December 31, 2020 (i.e., “20 by 2020”). In order to meet the urban water use target requirement, each retail supplier was required to determine its baseline water use, as well as its target water use for the Year 2020. Water use is measured in gpcd.

This chapter provides a review of the calculation of the City’s 2020 Urban Water Use Target and demonstrates that the City has achieved its 2020 target reduction.

In this UWMP, the City is required to report its compliance with the 2020 urban water use target as of 2020. The 2020 urban water use target has since been superseded by the establishment of Urban Water Use Objectives as part of the Making Conservation a C alifornia Way of Life regulation adopted on July 3, 2024. Starting in 2024, the City’s Urban Water Use Objective is calculated and reported annually through a separate process , and therefore, the City does not compare its 2025 water use with its 2020 target. Additional information on the City’s water conservation practices and objectives is included in Chapter 9.

5.1 OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND
The City’s compliance with SB X7-7 was first addressed in the City’s 2010 UWMP. The City’s baseline per capita water use was determined, and urban water use targets for 2015 and 2020 were established and adopted. Actual water use data and population estimates were used to calculate GPCD water use.

SB X7-7 required each urban water retailer to determine its baseline daily per capita water use over a 10-year or 15-year baseline period. In its 2015 UWMP, the 10-year baseline period that the City selected was verified to be 1995 through 2004. The City calculated its baselines and water use targets on an individual reporting basis in accordance with SB X7-7 legislation requirements and DWR Methodologies for Calculating Baseline and Compliance Urban Per Capita Water Use (2016) (DWR Methodologies).

Details of the specific methodology used to calculate the City’s 2020 water use target are documented in its 2020 UWMP.

5.2 2020 DAILY PER CAPITA WATER USE COMPLIANCE
In its 2020 UWMP, the City calculated its actual 2020 water use for the 2020 Calendar Year in accordance with the DWR Methodologies document. As shown in Table 5-1 (DWR Table 5 -1R), urban per capita water use in 2020 was 152 GPCD, which is below the confirmed 2020 water use target of 232 gpcd. Therefore, the City met its 2020 final water use target. Water use in 2020 in the City’s service area was reduced as compared to baseline years as a result of increased water conservation efforts by the City and its customers.

Chapter 5
SB X7-7 Baselines, 2020 Target, and 2025 Reporting

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
5-2 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 5-1. SB X7-7 2020 Target Progress (DWR Table 5-1R)

5.3 REGIONAL ALLIANCE
The City has chosen to comply with the requirements of SB X7-7 on an individual basis. The City has elected not to participate in a regional alliance.

Actual 2025 GPCD
(From SB X7-7
Compliance Form)
Did Supplier meet
the 2020 Target in
2025?
No Individual
Target 232 152 Yes NA
Did Supplier
Achieve Targeted
Reduction for
2020?
Actual 2020
GPCD2020 Target
Regional
Alliance Target
or Individual
Target?
Drop down list
DWR NOTES:

Suppliers calculating a 2025 GPCD will need to complete and submit SB X 7-7 Compliance Tables to verify the use of SB X7-7 Methodologies.

Suppliers that were part of a merger or consolidation since 2020 see Chapter 5 and Appendix P for guidance.

NA=Not Applicable
Check the box if the Supplier was not an Urban Water Supplier during or before the 2020 UWMP reporting cycle.

Proceed to the next table.

Only for suppliers that did not meet
the Target in 2020
See DWR NOTES below.

Was Supplier part of
a merger or
consolidation since
2020?

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-1 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

CHAPTER 6
Normal Year Water Supply Characterization
This chapter characterizes the City’s water supply portfolio. Currently available water supplies, as well as future anticipated water supplies, are described and quantified. The management of each water supply is discussed, along with the measures that the City has taken to develop planned sources of water.

The City’s existing water supply facilities are described in Chapter 3 of this UWMP, and its water supplies consist of the following:
• Treated surface water purchased from WDCWA through the DWWSP; • Groundwater pumped by the City from City-owned and operated wells; • Treated surface water purchased from WDCWA which is stored in an aquifer and recovered from the City’s ASR wells for distribution and use when surface water supplies are limited; and • Recycled water from the City’s Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF).

Anticipated availability of the City’s water supplies under a normal water year is provided in this chapter.

The availability of the City’s water supplies under a single dry year and a drought lasting five years, as well as more frequent and severe periods of drought, are described in detail in Chapter 7 of this UWMP, along with the basis of those estimates.

6.1 PURCHASED OR IMPORTED WATER
The City currently purchases and imports water from WDCWA. Starting in mid-2016, the City began receiving treated surface water from the Sacramento River through WDCWA. Under the City’s ASR program, some of this treated surface water is distributed directly to customers and a portion is stored in the aquifer during low-water demand months, typically winter, when surface water supplies are abundant. Stored water is recovered and distributed to customers during high-water demand months, typically summer, when surface water supply is limited.

WDCWA, a Joint Powers Authority formed by the Cities of Davis and Woodland, with additional non-voting board members from UC Davis and Yolo County, owns the following major facilities that are part of the DWWSP:

The Joint Intake shared with Reclamation District 2035 along the Sacramento River just north of the Interstate 5 bridge overcrossing.

A raw water transmission pipeline that delivers untreated Sacramento River water to the Regional Water Treatment Facility (RWTF) for treatment.

An RWTF with 30 million gallons per day (MGD) (33,626 AFY) of production capacity.

Finished water pump station facilities and associated delivery mains serving Woodland and Davis, respectively.

The allocation of RWTF capacity among the cities of Woodland and Davis and the University of California, Davis – also referred to as “Project Participants” is 18 MGD (20,176 AFY) for Woodland, 10.2 MGD (11,433 AFY) for Davis, and 1.8 MGD (2,018 AFY) for UC Davis, which equates to a 60/34/6 percent split.

Two finished water mains deliver treated water to Woodland, one to the southern portion of the City and one to the northern portion of the City, with design flo w capacities of 34.3 MGD ( 38,446 AFY) and

15.2 MGD (17,037 AFY), respectively, for a combined delivery capacity of 49.5 MGD (55,484 AFY). To date, the most water from WDCWA that the City has used in a single day is 15.57 million gallons (MG) (170.5 AF) in May 2022.

Chapter 6
Normal Year Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-2 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

WDCWA holds Water Right Permit 20281 (Application A030358), referred to herein as the primary water right, which entitles WDCWA to divert up to 45,000 AF annually from the Sacramento River. This equates to an annual average flow rate of approximately 40 MGD. This water right cannot be fully utilized unless and until the RWTF is expanded. Additionally, this water right is unavailable when state-administered Term 91 curtailments are in effect.

In anticipation of Term 91 curtailments, WDCWA purchased portions of Water Right Licenses 904A and 5487A from the Conaway Preservation Group in 2010. These two rights are collectively referred to as the secondary water rights, and they are only used by WDCWA when Term 91 curtailments are in effect. The WDCWA secondary water rights entitle WDCWA to 10,000 AF of Sacramento River water during the April through October period but are reduced by 25 percent to 7,500 AF during Lake Shasta critical years. No secondary water right water is available at all to WDCWA during the period of November through March.

The secondary water rights are allocated according to a 52.1/44.4/3.5 percent split among Woodland, Davis, and UC Davis, respectively.

Since the DWWSP began operations in June 2016, WDCWA’s ability to meet all its Project Participant demands has varied year-to-year. Since 2016, there have been three scenarios in which WDCWA needed to purchase water from other agencies:

During Term 91 curtailments that occur during the months of November through March.

The Agency’s primary water right (discussed below) is unavailable during Term 91 curtailments, and the Agency’s secondary water rights (also discussed below) are unavailable during November through March. Since the Agency began operations in 2016, post-October Term 91 curtailments have occurred four times:
a. 2018: From November 16 to November 30
b. 2020: Beginning before November and ending on December 24 c. 2022: Beginning before November and ending on December 7 d. 2025: Beginning before November and ending on November 5 During extended Term 91 curtailments that occur prior to November in a Lake Shasta critical year, as occurred during 2021. In that year, Term 91 curtailments began on April 29, and the Agency’s senior water rights were reduced by 25 percent to 7,500 AF, due to 2021 being declared a Lake Shasta critical year by the USBR.

During the unprecedented surface water allocation reductions in 2022. In that year, the USBR reduced certain senior water rights to amounts far below those available during typical Lake Shasta critical years. The net effect on the Agency was that the usual 10,000 AF available under its senior water rights during the period of April through October was reduced by 87 percent to 1,300 AF.

In response to these scenarios, WDCWA purchased surface water through short -term agreements from the following agencies:
• City of West Sacramento: 705 AF of water in 2018, and 1,383 AF of water in 2020. • The Nature Conservancy: 365 AF in 2021
• Conaway Preservation Group: 1,300 AF in 2022
• South Sutter Water District: 6,700 AF in 2022 and 120 AF in 2025

Chapter 6
Normal Year Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-3 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

The City’s actual and projected normal year water supplies from WDCWA are shown in Table 6-1 in 5-year increments from 2025 to 2050. The availability of these sources under single dry, five-year droughts, and other water year conditions are discussed in Chapter 7.

Table 6-1. Purchased or Imported Water Supplies – Actual and Projected (AF) Water Supplier
Additional Detail
on Water Supply
Actual and Projected Water Supply Volume(a,b)
2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
WDCWA 11,095 18,705 18,705 18,705 22,940 22,940
(a) Actual purchased water supply for 2025 is from the City’s 2025 Electronic Annual Report. (b) Projected purchased water supply for 2030-2050 is equal to the allocated water supply in WDCWA’s 2025 UWMP. The City is assumed to receive no additional allocations from WDCWA’s RWTF expansion to 34 mgd (expected by 2030) and 50 percent of additional capacity from the RWTF expansion to 46 mgd (expected by 2045). The exact capacity allocation for the expansion to 46 mgd has not yet been determined.

As described in Chapter 7, surface water supply curtailments are possible in dry years and may be offset with additional groundwater use and/or demand reduction through implementation of the City’s WSCP, described in Chapter 8.

6.2 GROUNDWATER
The City maintains a series of intermediate aquifer wells, most of which are for emergency purposes only.

The City currently maintains two active groundwater wells (not including the three ASR wells) and four standby groundwater wells for municipal water supply. Due to lower water quality from the groundwater compared to surface water, the City has a stated goal to minimize the use of its groundwater wells for potable supply. Naturally-occurring salinity, boron, selenium, and hexavalent chromium in groundwater present the City with challenges in complying with wastewater discharge requirements. It is also the City’s policy that the blended surface water to groundwater ratio must never be lower than 3-to-1 at any point in the system due to the aesthetic differences between surface water and intermediate aquifer groundwater. Accordingly, the wells are not available at all when surface water deliveries are fully curtailed, except on an emergency basis.

The two existing, active wells are configured to tie directly into the City’s southern delivery main, such that the extracted water can be blended with treated surface water. In addition, both of these wells are tied into the southern delivery main, which further limits the amount of groundwater available for blending. A total of approximately 1.4 MGD (1,613 AFY) of firm capacity exists among the two active wells, where the firm capacity is defined as the total well capacity for both wells minus the capacity of the largest well.

The City has inactivated and demolished four wells since 2020, and intends to inactivate and demolish two additional wells (one standby and one inactive) in 2027. Whereas groundwater was the City of Woodland’s only municipal water supply until 2016, the conversion to surface water as the primary water source has rendered many of the legacy wells obsolete.

The use of surface water as a primary supply source, with ASR being used to supplement direct delivery of treated surface water to customers, addresses the City’s regulatory compliance issues associated with groundwater. Native groundwater is blended with the surface water supply on a limited basis.

Groundwater is also used as an emergency supply source.

Chapter 6
Normal Year Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-4 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

6.2.1 Groundwater Basin Management
The groundwater basin underlying the City is the Sacramento Valley Basin, Yolo Subbasin (DWR Basin No. 5-021.67), as shown on Figure 6-1. The Yolo Subbasin is not adjudicated and is bounded by Cache Creek on the north; the Sacramento River on the east; Putah Creek on the south; and the Coast Range on the west (DWR, 2004). Figure 6-1 shows the location of the City in relation to the boundaries of other local agencies overlying the groundwater basin areas.

Land surface elevations within the Yolo Subbasin range from approximately 0 feet above sea level along the southeastern edge to approximately 400 feet along the western edge. Except near the western edge of the basin, where land surface elevations increase with proximity to the Coast Range, the topographic relief is low. Land surface elevations within the City service area range from approximately 30 to 80 feet.

The Plainfield Ridge, the topographic expression of the Dunnigan Hills anticline, is an area of slightly elevated rolling hills located approximately four miles west of Woodland. The Yolo Basin, the flood basin of the Sacramento River, is located approximately three miles east of Woodland (Figure 6-1).

The Yolo Subbasin, which includes the groundwater basin underlying the City, has documented groundwater issues, including inelastic land subsidence due to groundwater withdrawal and water quality concerns, as described above.

In 2014, the California legislature enacted the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) in response to continued overdraft of California’s groundwater resources. The Yolo Subbasin is classified by DWR to be a high-priority subbasin. SGMA requires a groundwater sustainability plan to address measures necessary to attain sustainable conditions in the Subbasin. Sustainability is generally defined as long-term reliability of th e groundwater supply and the absence of undesirable results, frequently caused by over-pumping.

The City partnered with other users through the YSGA to manage the groundwater basin. The City, along with twenty -four other groundwater users and groundwater sustainability agencies, formed the YSGA in 2017 in response to SGMA. In 2022, the YSGA completed the Yolo Subbasin Groundwater Agency 2022 GSP identifying actions to achieve groundwater sustainability in the Subbasin by 2042, included in this UWMP by reference. 1 At the time of adoption of the GSP, the YSGA was comprised of twenty -six total members.

In general, the GSP shows that groundwater elevations have a relatively consistent long -term average over the period of study (1971 -2018), though groundwater elevations are affected by seasonal and drought-cycle variability. Water quality constituents pres ent in the subbasin may affect beneficial uses, and the GSP notes that total dissolved solids levels are high in the shallow zone in the eastern subbasin, part of which underlies the City. The GSP outlined the need to maintain and enhance groundwater quantity and quality and maintain surface water flows and quality.

1 Yolo Subbasin Groundwater Agency. January 2022. Yolo Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan. https://www.yologroundwater.org/yolo-subbasin-groundwater-sustainability-plan Accessed on February 5, 2026.

Reclamation
District
No 2068
Reclamation
District No 999
Reclamation
District
No 2035
Reclamation
District
No 1000
South Sutter
Water
District
Solano
Irrigation
District
Yolo County Flood
Control And Water
Conservation District
Sacramento
Suburban Water
District
Sacramento Valley
- South American
Subbasin (5-021.65)
Sacramento Valley
- Yolo Subbasin
(5-021.67)
Sacramento Valley -
Sutter Subbasin
(5-021.62)
Sacramento Valley
- North American
Subbasin (5-021.64)
Sacramento Valley -
Solano Subbasin
(5-021.66)
Dixon
Davis
West
Sacramento
Woodland
Vacaville
Sacramento
Esparto
Modesto
Hayward
Roseville
San Jose
San Francisco
Santa Rosa
Oakland
Stockton
Sacramento
County Boundary
DWR Bulletin 118
Groundwater Basin
City of Woodland
City of Esparto
City of Davis
City of Dixon
City of Sacramento
City of Vacaville
City of West Sacramento
Figure 6-1
Groundwater Basins0 3 6
MilesN
City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water
Management Plan
Prepared for:

Prepared by:

Fig 6-1. Groundwater Basins: N:\Clients\204 Woodland\60-25-68 2025 UWMP\GIS\PRO\Woodland 2025 UWMP v2.aprx - mmar - 2/5/2026

Chapter 6
Normal Year Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-6 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

The GSP identified seventy -seven projects for potential development, along with management actions, that either replace groundwater use or supplement groundwater supplies to meet current and future water demands. The list of seventy -seven potential projects included in the GSP represent a variety of project types including direct groundwater recharge an d managed aquifer recharge, and conjunctive water use and supply development to be undertaken by the member agencies. For future (2070) use, the GSP determined an estimated pumping offset and/or recharge need of 12,000 AFY Subbasin -wide to achieve sustaina bility under normal conditions, or 54,000 AFY under dry conditions with extreme demands. These amounts may be reevaluated after additional data are collected and analyzed.

One of the projects identified in the GSP to reduce groundwater demand in the City is the design and construction of a new municipal ASR well (refer to Section 6.3) . The City’s ASR well project is currently underway and anticipated to be completed within the next five years. The need for additional ASR wells will be determined based on water demands in the future. The City also manages its groundwater demands by implementing demand management measures (DMMs) outlined in Chapter 9 of this UWMP.

The DMMs include a water waste prevention ordinance, metering, conservation pricing, public education and outreach, programs to assess and manage distribution system real loss, and water conservation program coordination and staffing support.

From 202 2 to 204 2, members of the YSGA, including the City, will be monitoring and reporting their progress on implementing project s and studies and the impacts of their outreach. Evaluations will be conducted every five years.

The GSP estimates the sustainable yield of the Yolo Subbasin at 346,000 AFY over the Subbasin area of 845 square miles (approximately 0.64 AFY/acre). This sustainable yield amount is equivalent to a groundwater yield of approximately 5,937 AFY based on the City’s current water service area of approximately 9,280 acres and approximately 8,177 AFY based on the Planning Area of 12,781 acres, as reported in the City’s General Plan Update 2035. As described in Section 6.2, the City has inactivated and demolished several wells over the past five years and plans to inactivate and demolish additional wells in the future. In the futu re, the City’s groundwater production may be limited by the capacity of its groundwater well pumps rather than the sustainable yield of the subbasin.

6.2.2 Groundwater Use – Past Five Years
Historically, the local groundwater basin provided all of the City’s water supply. However, since 2016 with WDCWA surface water deliveries, the City’s reliance on groundwater has been significantly reduced.

The volume of groundwater pumped by the City over the past five years is summarized in Table 6-2 (DWR Table 6-1R). Groundwater supply provided an average of 582 AF, 6 percent of the City’s water supply between 2021 and 2025. During this five-year period, more than 90 percent of the groundwater utilized came from the City’s ASR wells. In 2020, the City pumped 1,273 AF from the groundwater basin, about 12 percent of the City’s total water supply . During the past five years , the City has been operating its groundwater withdrawals within the subbasin’s sustainable yield, and the available groundwater quantity was sufficient. However, due to high observed concentrations of hexavalent chromium and nitrates, groundwater from the City’s native groundwater wells must be blended before entering the water system and the City has significantly decreased its native groundwater use compared to previous years.

Chapter 6
Normal Year Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-7 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 6-2. Groundwater Pumped in Last Five Years (DWR Table 6-1R)

6.2.3 Groundwater Use – Projected
The City plans to maintain its blending wells as an emergency supply while relying primarily on its purchased surface water. In dry years, the City will prioritize water from its ASR wells to help meet peak demands and make up for anticipated reductions in surface water deliveries during dry years.

The City’s projected normal year supplies for groundwater through 20 50 are provided in Table 6-3. As discussed in Section 6.2.1, the total projected groundwater supplies are the minimum of the total safe yield of groundwater available from the Yolo Subbasin between 202 5 and 20 50 and the estimated available groundwater use by City -owned wells within City limits , reduced to reflect the City’s plans for the future inactivation and demolition of City wells.

Projected groundwater supplies shown in Table 6-3 will be used to supplement purchased surface water from WDCWA and ASR well water during emergencies, as shown in Table 6-1. The total projected water supply available for the City to meet projected water demands is further discussed in Section 6.9. The availability of groundwater under single dry, five -year droughts, and any other water year conditions is discussed in Chapter 7.

Table 6-3. Groundwater Supplies – Projected (AF)
Groundwater
Type
Location or
Basin Name
Projected Water Supply Volume(a)
2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Alluvial Basin
Yolo Subbasin of the
Sacramento Valley
Groundwater Basin
2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500
(a) Projected groundwater supply is assumed to be equal to the minimum of (1) a portion of the calculated total sustainable yield from the Yolo Subbasin equivalent to the City’s proportion of the total Subbasin area and (2) the total capacities of the City’s planned available blending and standby wells.

Groundwater Type
Drop Down List
May use each category
multiple times
Potable or
Non-Potable
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Location or Basin Name 2021 (AF) 2022 (AF) 2023 (AF) 2024 (AF) 2025 (AF) Alluvial Basin Potable
Yolo Subbasin of the
Sacramento Valley
Groundwater Basin
1,534 967 154 185 68
1,534 967 154 185 68
Add additional rows as needed
DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

NOTES

1. Total groundwater volumes include water pumped from ASR wells.

2. For each year, total groundwater volumes were composed of 62% (2021), 94% (2022), 100% (2023), 95% (2024), and 100% (2025) ASR well water.

Total
Check the box if the Supplier does not pump groundwater.

Proceed to the next table.

Check the box if all or part of the groundwater described below is desalinated. (OPTIONAL)

Chapter 6
Normal Year Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-8 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

6.3 AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY
With an objective of creating a reliable water system to meet the needs of the community, the City has developed an ASR program that utilizes constructed water infrastructure along with future surface water supplies to increase reliability. ASR wells include features that allow injection of treated surface water from the distribution system into the groundwater aquifer. This injection capability allows the City to take surface water sources that are available, treat it, and then inject it into the aquifer for later use.

The primary purpose of the City’s ASR program is to provide a supplement to the surface water supply.

WDCWA’s appropriative water right that enables diversion of water from the Sacramento River is limited by Term 91 curtailments. Term 91 prohibits diversions whenever “satisfaction of in basin entitlements requires releases of supplemental Project water by the Central Valley Project or the State Water Project”. The State Water Board provides notification of curtailments under Term 91 as far in advance of the curtailment as practicable, based on information provided to the State Water Board by the Central Valley Project (CVP) and State Water Project (SWP) operators. Whether, and to what extent, Term 91 curtailments are imposed in a given year depends on hydrologic conditions, water demands of water right holders, water demands supporting environmental needs and water quality objectives for balanced conditions in the Delta, and other factors. The City’s ASR program enables storage of treated surface water in the aquifer during low-demand winter months, when Term 91 is typically not imposed, and recovery of the treated surface water during high demand summer months when Term 91 is more likely to be imposed.

In 2014, the City received a permit from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Permit Amendment No. 01-09-19-PER-004, for testing of the ASR program. Since then, the City has constructed three ASR wells and is currently in the process of designing and constructing an additional ASR well, which is expected to be completed within the next five years. The need for any additional ASR wells will be re-evaluated by the City in the future based on projected demands . The existing wells have a tot al theoretical injection rate of 4.84 MGD (5,421 AFY) and total recovery rate of 7.07 MGD (7,920 AFY). The ASR injection and extraction rates of the individual wells are shown in Table 6-4.

Table 6-4. Summary of ASR Well Capacities
Well
Injection Extraction

MGD AFY MGD AFY
Existing
Well #28 1.69 1,893 2.12 2,375
Well #29 2.08 2,331 2.92 3,267
Well #30 1.07 1,197 2.03 2,278
Total Theoretical Capacity 4.84 5,421 7.07 7,920
Firm Capacity(a) 2.76 3,090 4.15 4,653
Reliable Injection Capacity(b) 3.80 4,256 – –
Practical Maximum Extraction Capacity(c) – – 5.74 6,431 Future
Future Wells(d) 1.44 1,613 2.59 2,903
(a) Firm capacity is defined as the injection or extraction capacity with the largest unit (Well #29) out of service. (b) Based on average injection rates over the past five years. (c) Based on maximum daily extractions over the past five years. (d) Each future ASR well is assumed to have an injection capacity of 1,000 gpm and an extraction capacity of 1,800 gpm.

Chapter 6
Normal Year Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-9 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Between January 2021 and December 2025 , Woodland’s cumulative ASR injections totaled 2. 64 billion gallons (8,096 AF) (excluding volumes pumped to waste) and cumulative extractions totaled 0. 95 billion gallons (2,908 AF) for a net total storage of 1.69 billion gallons (5,188 AF).

6.4 SURFACE WATER
The City does not currently use or plan to use self-supplied surface water. However, the City purchases surface water from WDCWA through the DWWSP as discussed in Section 6.1.

6.5 STORMWATER
The City does not currently use or plan to use stormwater for beneficial reuse.

6.6 WASTEWATER AND RECYCLED WATER
The City owns and operates the WPCF, which it utilizes to collect, treat, and dispose of wastewater for the City. The City started delivering recycled water produced at the WPCF in February 2017. Both wastewater and recycled water are discussed in the following sections.

6.6.1 Wastewater Collection, Treatment, and Disposal
In this section, the City’s collection system, treatment, and disposal services are described.

6.6.1.1 Wastewater Collected Within Service Area
The City’s Department of Public Works (DPW) Wastewater Operations group manages wastewater collection and treatment for the City’s service area. The City’s DPW owns 212 miles of sanitary sewer piping which service approximately 17,550 lateral connections.2 The WPCF collection system service area covers only areas within the City from a combination of residential and non -residential sources. The collection system transports water to the WPCF, located east of County Road 102 and Gibson Road.

A summary of the wastewater generated in the City’s wastewater service area is provided in Table 6-5 (DWR Table 6-2R).

2 Robertson-Bryan, Inc. July 2025. City of Woodland Sewer System Management Plan. https://cityofwoodland.gov/DocumentCenter/View/13204/Woodland-SSMP-2025-including-appendicies?bidId= Accessed on February 17, 2026.

Chapter 6
Normal Year Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-10 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 6-5. Wastewater Collected Within Service Area in 2025 (DWR Table 6-2R)

6.6.1.2 Wastewater Treatment and Discharge Within Service Area The WPCF was originally built in 1988 and was expanded in 1997, 1999, and 2007. The 2007 project upgraded the plant to provide tertiary level treatment. The site includes the WPCF, an overflow pond, and a series of ponds to the south receiving sludge and e ffluent. The area to the north of the WPCF was formerly occupied by other treatment ponds. In 2010 these ponds were cleaned and re -purposed for a stormwater detention basin, the new WDCWA regional water treatment facility, and an area used for stockpiling stabilized biosolids prior to disposal. A retrofit project was completed in December 2016 that replaced the existing WPCF’s aeration brushes with more energy efficient fine bubble diffusers and high-speed turbo blowers to convert the ditches to the modified Ludzack-Ettinger process. The modified process required adding selector zones, baffling, and mixers.

These modifications improved secondary process performance and settleability. The WPCF serves all residential, commercial, and industrial users within the City’s service area with the exception of a tomato processing plant which treats and discharges tomato wastes on lands directly to the east of the WPCF site.

Operation of the WPCF must comply with treated effluent, receiving water, groundwater, and pond disposal limitations required under its existing National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit Number CA0077950. Under this permit, the plant is authorized to discharge up to 10.4 MGD (11,657 AFY) average dry weather flow into the Tule Canal. The permit was renewed in February 2026, became effective in April 2026, and expires in March 2030.

Name of Wastewater
Collection Agency
Wastewater
Volume
Metered or
Estimated?

OPTIONAL
Drop Down List
Volume of
Wastewater Collected
from UWMP Service
Area 2025 (AF)
Name of Wastewater
Treatment Plant (WWTP) and
Place ID Number
Drop down list
Is WWTP
Located Within
UWMP Area?
Drop Down List
City of Woodland Metered 4,759
Woodland Water Pollution
Control Facility, Place ID
272960
Yes
4,759
Check the box if there is no wastewater collection system.

Proceed to the next table.

Percentage of 2025 service area population served by wastewater collection system (OPTIONAL)
Percentage of 2025 service area served by wastewater collection system (OPTIONAL) DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

Additional Guidance: See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table.

Wastewater Collection Recipient of Collected Wastewater Total Wastewater Received from UWMP
Service Area in 2025:

Add additional rows as needed

Chapter 6
Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-11 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Between 2021 and 2025, the WPCF collected and treated an average of 0.34 MGD (381 AFY) of wastewater with peak flows typically occurring in the late fall and early winter months. During the wet season (late fall to early spring), treated wastewater is primarily discharged to the Tul e Canal. This effluent is treated to the tertiary level in compliance with Title 22 surface water discharge standards.

Table 6-6 (DWR Table 6-3R) provides information on the wastewater treated and discharged within the City’s water service area in 2025.

Table 6-6. Wastewater Treatment and End Uses Within Service Area in 2025 (DWR Table 6-3R) Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
(AF)
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
(AF)
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
(AF)
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
(AF)
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
(AF)
Name of other
entity
Woodland Water
Pollution Control
Facility, Place ID
272960
No 4,759 3,502 Tertiary 493 - Tertiary 3,009 - - N/A 4,759 3,502 493 0 3,009 0 0
2025 Outcomes of Treated Wastewater
Check the box if no wastewater is treated or disposed of within the UWMP service area.

Proceed to the next table.

Does This
Plant Treat
Wastewater
Generated
Outside the
UWMP Service
Area?
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Wastewater
Treatment Plant
Name and Place ID
Number
Drop down list
Total 2025
Volume of
Water
Treated
(AF)
Total
2025 Volume
of Wastewater
Received from
UWMP Service
Area
(As Reported
in Submittal
Table 6-2 R)
(AF)
Water Recycled Within
UWMP Service Area
(enter data as applicable)
DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

IPR: Indirect Potable Reuse would have the treatment level of its end use requirement in the Level of Treatment drop-down.

Additional Guidance: See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table.

Water Recycled Outside
of UWMP Service Area
(enter data as applicable)
Effluent Discharge that is
not a Permitted Recycled
Water Use
(enter data as applicable)
Required Discharge for
Instream Flow
(enter data as applicable)
Delivered to Another Entity for Additional
Treatment
(enter data as applicable)
Add additional rows as needed

Chapter
6 Water Supply Characterization

N
-
C
-
204
-
60 -
25 -
68 -
WP

6 -
12 City of Woodland

2025 Urban Water Management Plan

May

2026

6.6.2 Recycled Water
Coordination

The City operates its own recycled water program for customers within the City’s service area. The City coordinates internally

with departments and staff regarding planning and operations of the recycled water system. The City also coordinates

directly
with its recycled water customers.

The WPCF is
responsible for the treatment and disposal of the City’s municipal wastewater. Since 2007, the WPCF has produced tertiary treated effluent which is adequate recycled water quality for the purposes of landscape ir
rigation at parks and industrial uses. The quantity
of available recycled water

that may be produced

is
near
-
equivalent to current

year
-
round
seasonal
demands
.

The City would need to increase storage to
deliver more recycled water

during the peak demand season
.

6.6.3 Recycled Water System Description

Currently, the City’s existing recycled water system consists of a n

8 -
inch

diameter recycled water pipeline
that runs
west on East Gibson Road

from the WPCF, northwest
along

Farnham Avenue,
then

crossing
Interstate 5
and continuing north
to the Woodland Biomass
power generating plant
.

In 2024, the City completed construction of the Spring Lake Recycled Water Project

in the Spring Lake
Specific Plan Area. This project
installed 2 miles of new recycled water pipelines

along
East Gibson Road
,
Harry Alonzo Avenue, Marston Drive, Parkland Avenue, and County Road 25A

and

connected an additional
mile of
existing

recycled water pipelines
on East Gibson Road near the WPCF
. During construction,
22 irrigation meters were converted from potable water to recycled water, including meters for
two parks
,
a school playground, and sidewalk
landscape
irrigation
.

As discussed in
Section

6. 6
.
1 .2
, treated effluent from the W
P
CF has primarily been discharged to the
Tule
Canal
. The following section discusses the current and projected recycled water use within the City.

6.6.4 Potential, Current, and Projected Recycled Water Uses

The City’s first planned recycled water project included an industrial user, Woodland Biomass, on the northeast side of town with the first phase delivering recycled water in 2017. The Woodland Biomass power generating plant was the City’s largest potable
water user prior to converting to recycled water use. The power plant uses cooling water as part of its power generation operation. The City designed facilities needed to deliver recycled water to this customer for the cooling water process and reduce the amount of potable
water used. Delivery of recycled water began in February 2017. Between March 2020 and mid
-
August

2021,
the Woodland Biomass plant was not

operational and therefore the City’s recycled water use in 2020

and a
portion of 2021

w
ere

significantly less than the previous three years since recycled water deliveries began.

Historically the
City’s
treated wastewater has had high Electrical Conductivity (EC) in the effluent, which ma
de

it unsuitable for beneficial agricultural or other beneficial use. EC indicates the amount of dissolved salts or salinity of water. An excess EC level can impact plant growth rate. A report titled “City of Woodland
Salinity Control and Minimization Workplan” (NexGen Utilities Management, May

2009)
examined the
sources of salinity in City wastewater and determined salinity enters the system from t hree major sources:
groundwater supplies; self
-
regenerating water softeners; and consumptive use.

Since surface water from
t
he DWWSP
was integrated into the City’s water supply sources in 2016, the EC levels in the WPCF influent have decreased significantly. Therefore, the City was able to initiate a recycled water program for industrial users and City parks in 2017
, reducing the need for groundwater supplies and self
-
regenerating
water softeners in the system.

Table

6 -
7 (DWR Table 6
-
4 R
)

summarizes the City’s current and planned recycled water direct beneficial uses within the City’s service area for 2025 to 2050.

Chapter 6
Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-13 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 6-7. Current and Projected Recycled Water Direct Beneficial Uses Within Service Area (DWR Table 6-4R) Volume Narrative page number
(OPTIONAL)
Landscape irrigation (exc golf
courses) Non-Potable
Four City parks, a school
playground, and sidewalk
landscaping
145 145 145 145 145 145 145 Page 6-15
Geothermal and other energy
production Non-Potable Energy Production1 315 315 315 315 315 315 315 Page 6-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
459 459 459 459 459 459 459
459 459 459 459 459 459 459 0
Check box if recycled water is not used and is not planned for use within the service area of the supplier. The supplier will only complete the column on "Potential Recycled Water Use" and submit an accompanying narrative on the feasibility of that potential recycled water use.

Potential Recycled Water Use
Name(s) of Facility/ies Producing (Treating) the Recycled Water (OPTIONAL) : Woodland Water Polluction Control Facility (WPCF) Name of Supplier Operating the Recycled Water Distribution System (OPTIONAL) : City of Woodland N/AVolume of Supplemental Water Added in 2025 (OPTIONAL) :

N/ASource of 2025 Supplemental Water (OPTIONAL) :

Total
Use Type
Drop down list
Potable or Non-Potable
(after treatment if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Additional Information
(as needed)
Add additional rows as needed
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

Additional Guidance: See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table.

Potential recycled water use: a description of the feasibility of these uses must be included in the narrative.

Multiple Producers: If you have multiple recycled water producers, submit a separate table for each.

NOTES:

1. Beneficial use through energy production assumes that the commercial energy production plant in the City remains active. 2050 (AF)2025 (AF) 2030 (AF) 2035
(AF)
2040
(AF)
2045
(AF)
Subtotal Potable
Subtotal Non-Potable

Chapter 6
Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-14 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 6-8 (DWR Table 6 -5R) compares the 20 20 UWMP recycled water use projections to 20 25 actual recycled water use. Actual recycled water use in 202 5 is less than the quantities projected in the 2020 UWMP primarily due to a reduction in recycled water needs at the Woodland Biomass facility.

Table 6-8. 2020 Recycled Water Use Projection Compared to 2025 Actual (DWR Table 6-5R)

6.6.5 Actions to Encourage Recycled Water Use
As established in the City of Woodland Code of Ordinances Section 13.44.190, new developments within the City’s designated recycled water use area are required to utilize recycled water for any landscape irrigation or industrial purpose. If a development is deemed suitable for the use of recycled water but recycled water is not yet available, the developer must provide an on-site connection point to enable connection to the recycled water distribution system in the future.

To encourage and support future recycled water use, the City may consider the following future policies and programs:
• Allow new development to create “new” supplies by participation in the implementation of recycled water facilities; and,
• Provide additional staff and program-specific financial resources required to implement and manage the future recycled water use program.

On a long-term basis, the City will continue to explore recycled water use opportunities but the expected volume increase in recycled water demand is difficult to predict and will depend on the types of industrial customers, and other customers, added to the recycled water system.

The City’s capacity at the WPCF is the controlling factor for the amount of recycled water that can be produced. Since the current demands from its recycled water customers are currently near the maximum production capacity of the WPCF, any expansion in the City’s recycled water system would require additional storage. The City’s only identified action currently planned to increase recycled water use within its service area, which involves adding recycled water storage, is shown in Table 6-9 (DWR Table 6-6R). 2020 Projection
for 2025 (AF)
2025 Actual
Use (AF)
152 145
450 315
602 459
Check the box if recycled water was not used in 2025 nor previously projected for use in 2020.

Proceed to the next table.

Add additional rows as needed
Landscape irrigation (exc golf courses)
Total
DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure reported in Submittal Table 2-3
Additional Guidance: See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table.

Use Type
Drop Down list
Geothermal and other energy production

Chapter 6
Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-15 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 6-9. Methods to Expand Future Recycled Water Use (DWR Table 6-6R)

6.7 DESALINATED WATER
Desalination is the process of removing dissolved minerals from brackish or saltwater to produce freshwater that can be used for municipal needs such as drinking water and industrial uses. It is one of several elements that may be included in a community’s water supply portfolio.

Because the City is not located in a coastal area, seawater desalination is not applicable to the City and is not considered a technically or economically feasible action to consider. In addition, the groundwater that underlies the City is not brackish in nature and does not require desalination. As such, the City does not have any plans to incorporate desalinated or treated brackish water into its supply portfolio.

6.8 WATER EXCHANGES AND TRANSFERS
In response to Term 91 curtailments and Lake Shasta critical years limiting WDCWA’s ability to meet the demands of its wholesale customers (i.e., the “Project Participants ”), WDCWA has purchased surface water through short-term agreements as mentioned in section 6.1.

WDCWA is also currently exploring long-term water supply reliability options to address recurring surface water shortfalls during Term 91 curtailments, especially during the period of November through March.

In the event of a catastrophic water supply emergency, WDCWA’s infrastructure may be used to wheel water between the Project Participants.

6.9 FUTURE WATER PROJECTS
The City has several options for additional potable water supplies should the need arise. Future water supply project opportunities are discussed in the sections that follow.

6.9.1 Groundwater
In the future, the City plans to use groundwater as an emergency supply while maintaining and replacing groundwater wells as needed to provide a minimum emergency supply capacity. The City will continue to determine which wells provide the greatest benefit based on location, water quality, age, and reliability, and will maintain a minimum number of wells in order to supplement surface water for peak and emergency demand conditions. Groundwater supply well ma intenance is ongoing, and the City will continue to monitor and ev aluate its wells for water quality, production, and structural and operational Name of Action Description Expected Increase in Recycled Water Use (AF)
Phase II of Recycled
Pipeline Project
Construct 100,000 gallon water tank for
landscape irrigation 106
106
106
Total (AF)
DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) MUST remain consistent with units reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

The unit conversion to Acre Feet addresses the Water Code's requirement that this value be provided in acre-feet.

Check the box if the Supplier does not plan to expand recycled water use in the future. Supplier will not complete the table below but will provide narrative explanation.

Provide page location of narrative in the UWMP
Add additional rows as needed
Unit Conversion to AF
Planned Implementation
Year
Dependent on Funding
Availability

Chapter 6
Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-16 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

reliability to ensure that future demands for groundwater are capable of being met. The City’s ASR program will be operated preferentially over the use of the groundwater blending wells, with the goal of zero groundwater use, if possible.

6.9.2 ASR Wells
As discussed in previous sections, the City has invested in development of an ASR program that utilize s constructed water infrastructure along with surface water supplies to increase reliability. ASR wells include features that allow injection of treated surface water from the distribution system into the groundwater aquifer. These wells allow the City to take surface water sources that are available, treat it, and then inject it into the aquifer for later use. The primary purpose of the ASR program is to p rovide a supplement to the surface water supply.

As discussed in Section 6.3, the City currently owns and operates three ASR wells, with plans to install additional ASR wells depending on demands. The first additional ASR well is expected to be operational by 2030. A specific date has not yet been determined for the second ASR well; the addition of a second ASR well will be dependent on future demands.

The City estimates 60 days of ASR well injection days per year during dry years and 185 days per year for wet years, depending on how long Term 91 is in effect during the winter. This estimate of injection days leaves approximately 180 to 305 days for possible extraction. Assuming that the future ASR wells would each have an injection capacity of 1,000 gpm (1,613 AFY), the City would be able to inject between 400AFY to 660 AFY of additional high-quality surface water per year, depending on the number of day s the City can inject. Assuming the future ASR wells would each have an extraction capacity of 1,800 gpm (2,903 AFY), the expected increase in extracted water supply ranges from 2,860 AFY to 4,850 AFY assuming 180 to 305 days of extraction per year. Pumping beyond the stored surface water capacity would result in diminished water quality relative to the surface water but , in the worst-case scenario (e.g., if Term 91 were in effect 365 days per year during the fifth year of drought), the ASR wells could be pumped 365 days of the year at flows of 1,800 gpm each, resulting in up to 5,810 AF per year of additional supply from the two new ASR wells.

Table 6-10 (DWR Table 6 -7R) summarizes the future water supply projects to increase water supply as described above.

Chapter 6
Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-17 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 6-10. Expected Future Water Supply Projects or Programs (DWR Table 6-7R)

6.10 SUMMARY OF EXISTING AND PLANNED SOURCES OF WATER
As discussed in Section 6.2.2, the commission of the RWTF by WDCWA’s Project Participants in 2016 reduced the City’s reliance on groundwater, greatly increasing the water supply reliability for the City by diversifying its supply portfolio. In general, the City’s goal is to prioritize surface water use; in years when insufficient surface water is available, the City would rely on withdrawing stored groundwater from its ASR wells. The City’s native groundwater wells will continue to be reserved for emergency use only due to water quality concerns.

In 2017, the City began to utilize recycled water from the WPCF for landscape irrigation and industrial purposes, shifting use away from potable water. Shifts to recycled water utilization provide further diversification and increased reliability of the Ci ty’s water supply sources and offset potable water demand, helping reduce the amount of surface water purchased from WDCWA and/or the amount of groundwater pumped. The City is currently maximizing the amount of recycled water it can supply using its existing facilities (e.g., WPCF production capacity). Expansion of the City’s recycled water system may be considered in the future and would likely require expanded storage.

The City’s existing water supplies and future projected normal year water supplies are summarized in Table 6-11 (DWR Table 6-8R) and Table 6-12 (DWR Table 6-9R), respectively.

Drop Down
List
(yes/no)
If Yes, Supplier Name
ASR Wells No Development of ASR
wells Potable
One well by 2030
and one well by
2045
All Year Types 2,860 -
4,8501,2,3
Planned for Use
in Year Type
Drop Down List
NOTES:

1. The City expects to inject treated surface water between 120 and 180 days per year depending on how long Term 91 curtailments are in effect during the winter, leaving 185 to 245 days for extraction. Assuming that the two future ASR wells would each have an injection capacity of 1,000 gpm, the City would be able to inject between 1,060 AF to 1,590 AF of additional high quality surface water per year.

2. Assuming the future ASR wells have an extraction capacity of 1,800 gpm, the expected increase in extracted water supply ranges from 2,940 AF to 3,900 AF with 185 to 245 days of extraction per year, respectively.

3. Pumping beyond the stored surface water capacity would result in diminished water quality relative to the surface water, but in the worst-case scenario (e.g., if Term 91 curtailments were in effect 365 days per year during the fifth year of drought), the ASR wells could be pumped 365 days of the year at 1,800 gpm each, resulting in up to 5,810 AF per year of additional supply from the two new ASR wells.

DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

Check the box if some or all of the supplier's future water supply projects or programs are not compatible with this table and are described in a narrative format.

Check the box if there are no expected future water supply projects or programs that provide a quantifiable increase to the agency's water supply.

Proceed to the next table.

Planned
Implementation
Year
Add additional rows as needed
Joint Project with other
suppliers? Expected
Increase in
Water Supply
to Supplier
(This may be
a range) (AF)
Provide page location of narrative in the UWMP
Name of Future
Projects or Programs
Additional Description
(as needed)
Potable or Non-Potable
(after treatment if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down list

Chapter 6
Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-18 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 6-11. Water Supplies – Actual (DWR Table 6-8R)
Water Supply
Drop down list
May use each category multiple
times. These are the only water
supply categories that will be
recognized by the WUEdata online
submittal tool
Potable or Non-Potable
(after treatment if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down list
Actual Volume
(AF)
Total Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See 'DWR Notes'
below (AF)
Groundwater (not desalinated) Groundwater withdrawn via ASR wells 1 Potable 68
Surface water (not desalinated) Purchases from WDCWA Potable 11,095 Groundwater (not desalinated) Raw water from agricultural wells Non-Potable 16 Recycled Water Non-Potable 493
11,163 0
509 0
11,672 0
2025
NOTES:

1. The City did not supply water from its native groundwater wells in 2025.

DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.

Total Entitlement: e.g. Water Right, Groundwater Allocation, Contracted Amount.

Add additional rows as needed
Total
Subtotal Potable
Subtotal Non-Potable
Additional Description
(as needed)

Chapter 6
Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-19 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 6-12. Water Supplies – Projected (DWR Table 6-9R) Water Supply
Reasonably
Available
Volume
(AF)
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See 'DWR Notes'
below (AF)
Reasonably
Available
Volume (AF)
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See 'DWR Notes'
below (AF)
Reasonably
Available
Volume
(AF)
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See 'DWR Notes'
below (AF)
Reasonably
Available
Volume (AF)
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See 'DWR Notes'
below (AF)
Reasonably
Available
Volume (AF)
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See 'DWR Notes'
below (AF)
Surface water (not
desalinated)
City's share of
RWTF capacity Potable 18,705 18,705 18,705 22,940 22,940 Groundwater (not
desalinated)
Groundwater
withdrawn via
ASR wells 1,2
Potable
Groundwater (not
desalinated)
Native
groundwater1 Potable
Groundwater (not
desalinated)
Raw water
from
Agricultural
Wells 3
Non-Potable 16 16 16 16 16
Recycled Water Non-Potable 493 493 493 493 493
18,705 0 18,705 0 18,705 0 22,940 0 22,940 0
509 0 509 0 509 0 509 0 509 0
19,214 0 19,214 0 19,214 0 23,449 0 23,449 0
Projected Water Supply (Report to the Extent Practicable) Drop down list
May use each category
multiple times. These are the
only water supply categories
that will be recognized by the
WUEdata online submittal
tool
Additional
Detail on
Water Supply
Potable or Non-Potable
(after treatment if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down list
2050 (opt)
Add additional rows as needed
Total
NOTES:

1. No volumes are shown for native groundwater or ASR well water because surface water is expected to be sufficient to meet the City's demands (refer to projected demands in DWR Table 4-2).

2. At times when surface water is insufficient to meet demands, ASR well water is planned to be used. Due to water quality concerns, the native groundwater wells are only planned to be used in the event of an emergency.

3. City well water from agricultural irrigation wells is planned to increase due to modifications to an existing inactive well for irrigation of a planned sports park. Exact water use estimates are currently unavailable but the increase will likely be nominal.
2030 2035 2040 2045
Subtotal Non-Potable
Subtotal Potable
DWR NOTES:

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

Total Entitlement: e.g. Water Right, Groundwater Allocation, Contracted Amount.

Chapter 6
Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-20 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

6.11 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS TO SUPPLY
Climate change is the most uncertain variable affecting future water supply and reliability. The following impacts of climate change related to the City’s water resources were discussed in the State’s 2018 Sacramento Valley Region Report for California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment.3 These impacts include:
• Warming temperatures
• Shrinking snowpack
• Shorter and more intense wet seasons
• More variable precipitation
• Increased periods of drought with less predictability • Pressure to reduce water supply storage due to larger floods The potential climate change impacts to surface water resources within California in connection with the SWP and CVP include the following:
• Pumping less water south of the Delta
• Having less surplus in reservoirs that can be used during shortages • Pumping more groundwater to augment reductions in surface water supplies • Increased risk that insufficient water availability could interrupt SWP and CVP operations The implementation of the DWWSP in 2016, along with the City’s ASR conjunctive use program, both described in previous sections, are adaptations to climate change that the City has implemented to diversify its water supply portfolio and provide the City with flexibility to adapt to changing weather and hydrology resulting from climate change. The most tangible effect of climate change hydrology on the City’s surface water supplies is likely to be the timing and frequency at which the State Water Board imposes Term 91 curtailments. As discussed in Section 6.1, surface water diversions under WDCWA’s primary water right are prohibited during Term 91 curtailments. WDCWA’s secondary water rights are not subject to Term 91 curtailments, but are subject to Lake Shasta critical year reductions, where the Lake Shasta designations for any given year are established by the USBR.

To further drought-proof the City’s water supply, the ASR program was implemented, offering flexibility for the City to use and bank surface water when it is plentiful and use recovered ASR water when surface water is unavailable.

As the dry seasons become longer and drier and summer landscape irrigation demand increases, supply availability will likely decrease simultaneously. This increase in demand may lead to increased groundwater pumping to compensate for the decreased surface water supplies. As wet seasons become shorter and more intense, the risk of flooding increases and the need for additional storage capacity also increases to capture the rainfall to last through the drier months. Since available surface water and groundwater may be impacted by climate change as described above, it can be assumed that the quantity of the City’s purchased surface water supply from WDCWA and the City’s groundwater supply may be

3 State of California. August 2018. Sacramento Valley Region Report for California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment.

Chapter 6
Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-21 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

negatively impacted from climate change. Additional implementation of rigorous water regulatory policies can also reduce the quantity of available water supplies and restrict water management adaptation strategies.

As discussed in Chapter 4, the City prepared a CAP in 201 7 to identify strategies and actions to adapt to the effects of climate change. The CAP identified that not all climate change effects, such as increased flooding and sea level rise, may impact the City.4 However, to mitigate effects of climate change on water supply reliability, the City will implement water conservation measures described in Chapter 9 and maximize the beneficial use of recycled water.

The City will also continue to review scientific and policy updates related to climate change as they become available through the State and other climate change authorities. In addition, the City will continue to implement the components of the YSGA GSP and this 2025 UWMP. The City will also continue to include adaptive management principles in its water supply and infrastructure planning. As part of the mitigation and adaptive measures, the City will consider the amount of energy and greenhouse gases required in moving water throughout the system. The effects from increased water conservation on the amount of energy required on new facilities will be reviewed in future water supply planning to minimize energy use impacts.

The quantitative consideration of the effects of climate change on projected water supply are discussed in Chapter 7. The projections presented in this chapter assume no limitations on the availability of the City’s water supply sources during a normal year. Chapter 7 addresses the water system reliability for the City during a single dry year and five consecutive dry years to consider the near -term effects of climate change on projected supplies and to direct planning for the WSCP.

6.12 ENERGY INTENSITY
In accordance with California Water Code §10631.2(a), the energy intensity to provide water service to the City’s water customers over a one -year period is presented in this section. The amount of energy to pump, treat, and distribute the City’s water supply within the system it owns and operates is included. For the purposes of the UWMP required energy intensity reporting, water suppliers are only expected to report the energy use associated with water management processes occurring within their operationa l control; thus, any energy use embedded in the extraction, treatment, storage, and distribution of treated surface water supplied to the City by WDCWA through the RWTF is not included in this analysis.

Water energy intensity is the total amount of energy in kilowatt hour (kWh), calculated on a whole-system basis, expended on a per million gallon basis, to deliver water from the City’s sources to its water customers. Understanding the whole-system energy intensity allows the City to make informed strategies in managing its water supplies and operating its system . Understanding the nexus of water and energy usage allows for the following measures:
• Identifying energy saving opportunities because energy consumption is often a large portion of the cost of delivering water
• Calculating energy savings and greenhouse gas emissions reductions associated with water conservation programs

4 City of Woodland. May 2017. City of Woodland Final 2035 Climate Action Plan.

Chapter 6
Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-22 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

• Identifying potential opportunities for receiving energy efficiency funding for water conservation programs
• Informing climate change mitigation strategies
• Benchmarking energy use at each water acquisition and delivery step and the ability to compare energy use among similar agencies
Annual energy use quantities were obtained from monthly P acific Gas & Electric billing data for the following assets:
• Groundwater well pumps for Wells 14-16, 19, 24, 26, and 28-30 (9 wells total), including pumping at each wellhead
• Dave Douglass Park booster pumps
• WPCF, including both pumping and treatment
In Table 6-13 (DWR Table O -1C), the energy intensity of the City’s water service for each of the above-mentioned assets is calculated as an annual utility total for 2025. The total energy intensity for the City’s water service area is 43.6 kWh/AF. The City does not currently utilize any non-consequential hydropower.

As discussed in Section 6.6.2, the City provides wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services to customers within its limits. The City owns and operates the wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal system. Although the City delivers recycled water, there is no submeter to separate recycled water energy consumption from the wastewater plant’s total electrical consumption. Therefore, the percentage of the City’s wastewater services shown in Table 6-14 (DWR Table O-2) is zero.

Chapter 6
Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-23 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 6-13. Energy Intensity – Total Utility Approach (DWR Table O-1C) Start Date of Reporting Period 1/1/2025
End Date of Reporting Period 12/31/2025
Is upstream embedded energy in
the values reported?
Units of Measure for Water AF
Extract and Divert Place into Storage Conveyance Treatment Distribution Total Utility
See DWR
NOTES
Hydropower Net Utility
68 0 0 0 11,672 N/A
100% 0% 0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
100% 0% 0% 0% 100% N/A 0% N/A
354,627 0 0 0 153,261 507,888 507,888
15,922.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.3 N/A 0.0 N/A
Delivery Volume
by Product
(volume units
defined above)
Total Energy
Intensity
(kWh/volume)
Net Energy
Intensity
(kWh/volume)
11,163 45.5 45.5
509 - -
0 - -
0 - -
0 - -
0 - -
0 - -
11,672 43.5 43.5
Quantity of Self-Generated Renewable Energy
0 kWh
Data Quality (drop down)
Metered Data
Data Quality Narrative:

Narrative:

Total Volume of Water Entering Each Process for All Product Types Only for Water Delivery Products Under the Urban Water Supplier's Operational Control Water Management Processes
Non-Consequential
Hydropower
(if applicable)
Retail Potable Deliveries (%)
Enter in Column
C of table below
Retail Non-Potable Deliveries (%)
Wholesale Potable Deliveries(%)
Wholesale Non-Potable Deliveries (%)
Agricultural Deliveries (%)
Environmental Deliveries (%)
Other (%)
Other
Total Percentage [must equal 100%]
Total Energy Consumed by Each Process for All Product Types (kWh) Energy Intensity (kWh/vol. converted to MG)
DWR NOTES: The volume of water entered in the “Total Utility” column should equal the volume of water entering the distribution system (excluding recycled water); in most cases, this is the total volume calculated in UWMP Table 4-1: 2025 Actual Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water. Note if recycled water is included in your Submittal Table 4-1, you must exclude it from your volume in this table.

Product Type
Retail Potable
Retail Non-Potable
Wholesale Potable
Wholesale Non-Potable
Agricultural
Environmental
Total of All Products
DWR NOTES: The volume of water entered in the “Total Utility” column should equal the volume of water entering the distribution system (excluding recycled water); in most cases, this is the total volume calculated in UWMP Table 4-1: 2025 Actual Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water. Note if recycled water is included in your Submittal Table 4-1, you must exclude it from the volume reported in Table O1-C..

Though the City does provide a small amount of non-potable recycled water, the energy intensity of retail non-potable deliveries is shown as zero because there is no submeter at the City's WPCF to separate recycled water consumption from the wastewater plant's total electrical consumption.

Chapter 6
Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-24 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 6-14. Energy Intensity – Wastewater & Recycled Water (DWR Table O-2)

Start Date of Reporting Period 1/1/2025
End Date of Reporting Period 12/31/2025
Is upstream embedded energy in the values reported?
Units of Measure for Water AF Collection /
Conveyance Treatment Discharge /
Distribution Total
4,759 4,759 3,502 13,020
267,046 4,108,445 0 4,375,491
172 2,649 0 1,031
0 0 493 493
0 0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0
Quantity of Self-Generated Renewable Energy related to
recycled water and wastewater operations
0 kWh
Data Quality (drop down)
Metered Data
Data Quality Narrative:

Narrative:

Volume of Wastewater Entering Process (volume units selected above) Wastewater Energy Consumed (kWh)
Volume of Recycled Water Entering Process (volume units selected above) Recycled Water Energy Consumed (kWh)
Wastewater Energy Intensity (kWh/volume converted to MG) Recycled Water Energy Intensity (kWh/volume converted to MG) Only for Water Delivery Products Under the Urban Water
Supplier's Operational Control
Water Management Process
Though the City does provide a small amount of non-potable recycled water, the energy intensity of retail non-potable deliveries is shown as zero because there is no submeter at the City's WPCF to separate recycled water consumption from the wastewater plant's total electrical consumption. Additionally, since there is no submeter at the City's WPCF, energy consumption cannot be distinguished between use for treatment versus discharge and distribution. Therefore, the energy consumption for wastewater discharge and distribution is shown as zero.

Chapter 6
Water Supply Characterization

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
6-25 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

6.13 REFERENCES
California Department of Water Resources (DWR). October 2025. California’s Groundwater: Bulletin 118 Update 2025 Draft. https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/calgw_update2025 Accessed on February 10, 2026.

City of Woodland. May 2017. General Plan Update 2035. https://cityofwoodland.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1180/Final- General-Plan-May-16-2017-PDF Accessed on October 2, 2025.

GEI Consultants, Inc. January 2022. Yolo Subbasin Groundwater Agency 2022 Groundwater Sustainability Plan. https://www.yologroundwater.org/yolo-subbasin-groundwater-sustainability-plan Accessed on January 5, 2026.

University of California, Davis. August 2018. Sacramento Valley Region Report for California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment. https://climateassessment.ca.gov/regions/ Accessed on February 10, 2026.

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
7-1 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

CHAPTER 7
Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment
This chapter discusses the City’s water supply reliability under varying conditions through 20 50. Factors impacting long -term reliability of water supplies are discussed. In assessing the City’s water supply reliability, a comparison of projected water supplies and projected water demand in normal, single dry, and five consecutive dry years is provided for the City’s water service area. This chapter also includes the City’s DRA for the next five years. Findings show that the City’s water supplies are sufficient to meet the existing and projected water demands during normal and dry conditions.

7.1 WATER SERVICE RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT
The City’s water supply reliability reflects its ability to meet the needs of its water customers with its water supply under varying conditions. Details from Chapter 4, which describe the City’s water use, and Chapter 6, which describes the City’s water s upply, are incorporated in this chapter to conduct the assessment. Findings from this assessment influence the City’s water management decisions.

7.1.1 Constraints on Water Sources
The City’s existing water supplies are described in Chapter 6 of this UWMP and consist of the following:
• Treated surface water purchased from WDCWA;
• Groundwater pumped by the City from the Yolo Subbasin; • ASR water; and
• Recycled water from the City’s WPCF.

This section presents the constraints on the City’s surface water supply, the City’s groundwater supply, and the City’s recycled water supply.

7.1.1.1 Purchased Water from WDCWA
The City purchases treated surface water from WDCWA. The constraints on WDCWA’s water supply source that affect its reliability and WDCWA’s strategies for managing the risks associated with its supply are discussed in this section and are directly taken from Section 7.1.1 from WDCWA’s Draft 2025 UWMP.1

7.1.1.1.1 WDCWA Water Supply Constraints
Through WDCWA, the City purchases treated Sacramento River water via the DWWSP. The following is a general discussion regarding the constraints on WDCWA’s water supplies and the associated strategies that have been employed to address these constraints.

In general, the biggest factor in the availability of WDCWA’s water supplies is climatic variability and associated constraints imposed on WDCWA’s various water rights. Specifically, below average snowpack and/or prolonged periods of dry weather contribute to Term 91 curtailments and Lake Shasta critical year conditions.

WDCWA possesses two sets of water rights under which it may divert surface water from the Sacramento River for transmission, treatment, and delivery. Water Right ID A030358 (Permit Number 020281) is

1 West Yost. February 2026. Draft 2025 Urban Water Management Plan for Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency.

Section 7.1.1 Water Service Reliability Assessment – Constraints on Water Sources.

Chapter 7
Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
7-2 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

referred to here as WDCWA’s primary water right. Under this water right, WDCWA can divert up to 40,000 AF in any given year. However, WDCWA’s primary water right is a junior water right under which diversions cannot occur when Term 91 curtailments are in effect.

WDCWA also possesses portions of two senior water rights that were purchased from Conaway Preservation Group. These two water rights are referred to here as WDCWA’s secondary water rights and include Water Right ID A001199A (Permit Number 000904A) and Water Right ID A012073A (Permit Number 005487A). WDCWA’s secondary water rights are not subject to Term 91 curtailments but are subject to Last Sha sta critical year reductions. In a Lake Shasta normal year, WDCWA can divert up to 10,000 acre-feet under these water rights during Term 91 curtailment periods, but the availability of these water rights is reduced by 25 percent to 7,500 acre-feet in a Lake Shasta critical year. In addition, WDCWA’s secondary water rights are only available for diversion during the period of April –October.

Accordingly, for any Term 91 curtailments that occur during the November–March period, WDCWA does not have any surface water rights available. The allocation of the secondary water rights among the Project Participants in summarized in Table 7-1. As noted in the table, USBR imposed extreme reductions in 2022 that resulted in an unprecedented reduction of 87 percent in WDCWA’s senior water rights.

Table 7-1. Availability of Surface Water under WDCWA’s Secondary Water Rights Condition/
Period
Surface Water Availability, acre-feet
Total Woodland Davis UC Davis
Lake Shasta Normal Year
April–October 10,000 5,210 4,440 350
Lake Shasta Critical Year
April–October 7,500 3,908 3,330 263
2022 Extreme Reductions
April–October 1,300 677.3 577.2 45.5

7.1.1.1.2 Water Quality Impacts
Impaired water quality has the potential to affect water supply reliability. All drinking water standards are set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) under the authorization of the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974. In California, the State Water Board Division of Drinking Water (DDW) can either adopt the USEPA standards or set more stringent standards, which are then codified in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. There are two general types of drinking water standards:
• Primary Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) are health protective standards and are established using a very conservative risk-based approach for each constituent that takes into account potential health effects, detectability and treatability, and costs of treatment.

Public water systems may not serve water that exceeds Primary MCLs for any constituent. • Secondary MCLs are based on the aesthetic qualities of the water such as taste, odor, color, and certain mineral content, and are considered limits for constituents that may affect consumer acceptance of the water but do not pose a restriction on public water systems’ ability to serve water to customers.

Chapter 7
Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
7-3 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

WDCWA routinely monitors its raw and treated water. The quality of water from the Sacramento River is not of concern as the river water is treated at the RWTF to a level that consistently exceeds both primary and secondary MCL drinking water standards. Therefore, WDCWA’s water management strategies and supply reliability are almost entirely dependent on water quantity rather than water quality.

7.1.1.1.3 Climate Change Factors
Section 6.10 of WDCWA’s 202 5 UWMP provides a summary of potential climate change impacts on supplies. As described therein, climate change is likely to impact future northern California water supplies, with the following climatological and hydrologic effects being likely:

1. Warmer winters resulting in increased runoff during the winter months (due to precipitation in the mountains being more likely to fall as rain versus snow), with a commensurate decrease in snowpack and springtime snowmelt.

2. Longer and more severe periods of drought.

3. Greater risk of wildfires, resulting in decreased forestation.

4. Greater storm intensities.

5. Greater variation in hydrologic conditions from year to year.

The potential climate change impacts to surface water resources within California in connection with the SWP and CVP include the following:
• Pumping less water south of the Delta
• Having less surplus in reservoirs that can be used during shortages • Pumping more groundwater to augment reductions in surface water supplies • Increased risk that insufficient water availability could interrupt SWP and CVP operations For WDCWA and its Project Participants, the most tangible effect of climate change hydrology is likely to be the timing and frequency at which the State Water Board imposes Term 91 curtailments, during which surface water diversions under WDCWA’s primary water right are prohibited. WDCWA’s secondary water rights are not subject to Term 91 curtailments, but are subject to Lake Shasta critical year reductions, where the Lake Shasta designations for any given year are established by the USBR.

7.1.1.2 Groundwater
Chapter 6 of this plan details the issues affecting the City’s use of the Yolo Subbasin, specifically water quality management and prevention of overdraft.

The Yolo Subbasin is identified by DWR as a high-priority subbasin that is not adjudicated. Between 1971 and 2018 , groundwater elevations in the Yolo Subbasin maintained relatively consistent long -term averages. The City’s wells within the Yolo Subbasin experience water quality issues, including high levels of total dissolved solids, hexavalent chromium, and nitrates. The City, along with other members of the YSGA, plan to help improve the Yolo Subbasin’s sustainability and reduce overdraft conditions through projects and management options outlined in the YSGA 2022 GSP.

The implementation of the City’s ASR Well Program and demand management measures discussed in Chapter 9 will help the City manage and reduce groundwater demands. Every five years from 202 2 to

Chapter 7
Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
7-4 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

2042, the City and the other members of the YSGA will report on the implementation progress and impacts of the groundwater projects identified in the GSP.

The GSP estimates the sustainable yield of the Yolo Subbasin at approximately 0.64 AFY/acre. As discussed in Section 6.2.1, by full buildout of the City’s Planning Area (12,781 acres), the City’s estimated groundwater yield excluding irrigation groundwater use is approximately 8,177 AFY. Historically, the City has not had any limitations on operating within the sustainable yield and obtaining sufficient groundwater supply. As such, the City’s groundwater supply is considered reliable under all hydrologic conditions.

Prior to 2016, the City had relied on shallow and intermediate -depth native groundwater wells as its primary water supply throughout its history. Increasingly stringent drinking water quality and wastewater discharge regulations obligated the City to seek other supplies, which resulted in the City’s participation in the DWWSP. Drinking water regulations and concerns remain a constraint on native groundwater usage. Because of this, two of the City’s existing intermediate aquifer wells are configured to tie d irectly into the surface water transmission main that serves the southern portion of the city, such that the extracted water can be blended with treated surface water.

Hexavalent chromium was previously one of the City’s major groundwater supply constraints until the MCL was rescinded by court order in September 2017. The original MCL was in effect from July 1, 2014 through September 2017, during which time several of the City’s native groundwater supply wells periodically exhibited hexavalent chromium concentrations in exceedance of the MCL. Hexavalent chromium, however, continues to be a contaminant of concern as a new drinking water MCL of 10 µg/L was issued in October 2024. Levels of naturally-occurring hexavalent chromium have increased in water from the City’s groundwater wells such that the groundwater must be blended to comply with the MCL.

The City continues to regularly monitor its water supplies for hexavalent chromium contamination.

Nitrates also place water quality constraints on the City’s native groundwater supply. The Primary MCL drinking water limit for nitrate [as N] is 10 mg/L. Due to a long history of agricultural operations in the immediate vicinity of the City, certain native groundwater supply wells have high levels of nitrate. Since the RWTF came online in 2016, the City retired those wells for anything other than emergency or landscape irrigation purposes. The City continues to regularly monitor nitrate levels in its water supplies.

It is the City’s policy that, to the extent possible, the blended surface water to groundwater ratio must never be lower than 3 -to-1 at any point in the system due to the aesthetic differences between surface water and intermediate aquifer groundwater. This blending dilutes the groundwater in the City’s supply thereby minimizing potential water quality problems posed by the City’s wells. Due to the water quality issues discussed previously, the City plans to limit its groundwater use to emergency use, with a minimum blended surface water to groundwater ratio of 3-to-1. Any reduction in the City’s surface water deliveries from WDCWA during dry years will be replaced with stored ASR water.

7.1.1.3 ASR Water
As described in Section 6.3, the City has developed an ASR program that increases reliability by injection of treated surface water from the distribution system into the groundwater aquifer. This injection capability allows the City to utilize surface water when available, treat and then inject into the aquifer for later use. The City currently has three wells with ASR capabilities and has plans to construct one additional ASR well by 2030 and another ASR well before 2050 pending future water demands. No major legal issues associated with constructing additional ASR wells or utilizing stored water from the existing ASR wells are anticipated.

Chapter
7 Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment

N
-
C
-
204
-
60 -
25 -
68 -
WP

7 -
5 City of Woodland

2025 Urban Water Management Plan

May

2026

7.1.1.4 Recycled Water

As discussed in Section 6.

6.2 , the City produces recycled water at the W
P
CF fully compliant with Title

22 disinfected tertiary recycled water requirements.

The City’s tertiary treated water meets all water quality requirements listed in the City’s NPDES permit
.

Since the City’s recycled water supply is appropriate for irrigation use, the City does not expect recycled water quality issues to impact its ability to reliably deliver recycled water to its customers during and after the expansion of
its

recycled water program, discussed in Section 6.
6 .4.

7.1.2 Year Type Characterization

Water supply reliability is assessed based on the characteristics of the City’s water supplies during various water year types which are provided in this section. CWC §10635(a) requires that the City’s water service reliability be assessed based on the fol
lowing three water year types:

1. Normal Year

–

A single year or averaged range of years in the historical sequence that most closely represents the average water supply available to the City.

Because the City has seen
permanent water demand reductions in the past 10 years and the City’s supplies have changed significantly due to the City’s transition to purchased water in 201 6 , historical data
prior to 201
6 would not accurately represent future conditions. Therefore, the City has chosen the
Year
20 21
, the year with water demands
closest to its median water production
over the past 5 years, to represent a Normal Year for the City.

2. Single Dry Year

–

The year that represents the lowest water supply available to the City.

Year
201
6 represents the City’s most severe single dry year, during which the City’s water supply was limited and the City experienced its lowest year of water use in the past 10 years

since surface water through WDCWA has been available
.

3. Five
-
Consecutive
-
Year Drought

–

The period that represents the lowest average water
supply availability to the City for a consecutive multiple year period (five years or more).

Years
201
6 through 20
20 represent the Five
-
Consecutive
-
Year Drought years for the City.

This five
-
year period was the lowest consecutive five
-
year period of water use in the past
10 years.

Table

7 -
2 (DWR Table 7
-
1 R
)

summarizes the
City
’s base water years for the normal year, single

dry year,
and multiple

dry year period.

Chapter 7
Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
7-6 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 7-2. Basis of Water Year Data (DWR Table 7-1R)

7.1.3 Potable Water Service Reliability
The City’s potable water supplies for all water year types include:
• Treated surface water purchased from WDCWA;
• Groundwater pumped by the City from the Yolo Subbasin; and • ASR water.

In this section, the City’s normal, single dry, and five consecutive dry years projected potable supplies and demands are integrated and compared. Projected potable water demands are detailed in Chapter 4 and projected potable water supplies are detailed in Chapter 6.

Under the various water year types, the total annual potable water supply sources available are compared to the total annual projected potable water use for the City’s water service area from 2030 to 2050 in five-year increments. In this potable water service reliability assessment, potable water demands are conservatively assumed to be unconstrained.
% of Average Supply
Average Year 2021 100%
Single-Dry Year 2016 89%
Consecutive Dry Years 1st Year 2016 89%
Consecutive Dry Years 2nd Year 2017 92%
Consecutive Dry Years 3rd Year 2018 94%
Consecutive Dry Years 4th Year 2019 91%
Consecutive Dry Years 5th Year 2020 104%
10,054
8,934
Year Type
Base Year
If not using a
calendar year, type
in the last year of
the fiscal, water
year, or range of
years, for example,
water year 2024-
2025, use 2025
Available Supplies if
Year Type Repeats
Check the box if quantification of available supplies
is not compatible with this table and is provided
elsewhere in the UWMP.

Location: [insert location from UWMP]
Volume Available (AF)
Quantification of available supplies is provided in this table as either volume only, percent only, or both.
8,934
9,231
NOTES:

1. Volume available for the average year reflects the 5-year average from 2021-2025. 2021 was the year with usage closest to the average; actual water usage for 2021 was 10,093 AF. 9,485
9,172
10,503
DWR NOTES: Supplier may use multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R if different water sources have different base years and the supplier chooses to report the base years for each water source separately. If a Supplier uses multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R, in the "Note" section of each submittal table, state that multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R are being used and identify the particular water source that is being reported in each submittal table.

Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table reports the units of measure reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

Chapter 7
Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
7-7 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

As discussed in Chapter 6, the City’s potable water supplies are expected to meet the City’s projected potable water demands. Any reduction of water supply from WDCWA will be supplemented by the City’s long-term ASR well supplies.

7.1.3.1 Potable Water Service Reliability – Normal Year Table 7 -3 (DWR Table 7 -2R) compares the projected normal year potable supply from Chapter 6 and projected potable demands from Chapter 4. As evidenced by the surplus shown in the table, the City’s potable water supplies are reliable during normal years. No potable water supply shortage is anticipated during normal years through 2050.

Table 7-3. Normal Year Supply and Demand Comparison – Potable (DWR Table 7-2R)

7.1.3.2 Potable Water Service Reliability – Single Dry Year Table 7-4 (DWR Table 7 -3R) compares projected single dry year potable supply and projected potable demands. The City’s water supplies and demands for a Single Dry Year are assumed to be equivalent to those for a Normal Year. As described in Section 7.3.2, the City’s single dry year supply is anticipated to be 22,418 AFY from combined surface water and ASR water through 2030. WDCWA’s RWTF is anticipated to be expanded to a total capacity of 34 MGD year-round (38,085 AFY) by 2030 and 46 mgd year-round (51,527 AF) by 2040. The City anticipates it will not be allocated any of the expansion to 34 mgd and 50 percent of the expansion to 46 mgd (25,762 AF) . However, this maximum total supply is not available under normal-year conditions. If necessary, the City plans to meet any additional potable demand through increased ASR groundwater pumping, ensuring no potable water supply shortage is anticipated during single dry years through 2050. Additionally, if there is any disruption in surface water supply, the City will increase ASR groundwater pumping to compensate. In general, the City’s potable water supplies are reliable during single dry years.
2030 (AF) 2035 (AF) 2040 (AF) 2045 (AF) 2050 (AF)
Supply totals
(autofill from Submittal
Table 6-9 R)
18,705 18,705 18,705 22,940 22,940
Use totals
(autofill from Submittal
Table 4-2 R)
11,325 11,489 11,656 11,825 11,996
Surplus/(shortfall) 7,380 7,216 7,049 11,115 10,944

Chapter 7
Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
7-8 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 7-4. Single Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison – Potable (DWR Table 7-3R)

7.1.3.3 Potable Water Service Reliability – Five Consecutive Dry Years Table 7-5 (DWR Table 7-4R) compares projected five consecutive dry years potable supply and projected potable demands. To be conservative, the City has assumed that demands would remain constant between normal, single dry, and a five -consecutive-dry year period. It is likely that by the third, fourth, and fifth year of an extended dry period, customers would increase conservation activities and effectively reduce demands below normal year conditions. As discussed in Section 7.1.3.2, the City plans to receiv e additional surface water allocations due to capacity expansions of WDCWA’s RWTF, resulting in the City’s total allocation increasing to 24.0 MGD (25,762 AFY) by 2040. If necessary, the City plans to meet any additional potable demand through increased ASR groundwater pumping and water conservation, ensuring 100 percent supply reliability. Additionally, if there is any disruption in surface water supply, the City will increase ASR groundwater pumping to compensate. No potable water supply shortage is anticipated during the five consecutive dry years through 2050. The City’s potable water supplies are reliable during a five consecutive dry year period.

If necessary, the City may also initiate a water shortage emergency declaration and implement its WSCP to assure that demands are within available supply, as described in Chapter 8.

Supply totals 18,705 18,705 18,705 22,940 22,940
Use totals 11,325 11,489 11,656 11,825 11,996
Surplus/(shortfall) 7,380 7,216 7,049 11,115 10,944
2035 (AF) 2040 (AF) 2045 (AF) 2050 (AF) 2030 (AF)

Chapter 7
Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment

N-C-204-60-25-68-WP
7-9 City of Woodland
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026

Table 7-5. Multiple Dry Years Supply and Demand Comparison – Potable (DWR Table 7-4R)

7.1.4 Non-Potable Water Service Reliability
The City’s source of non -potable water shown in this 2025 UWMP, for all water year types, is recycled water produced at the WPCF.

In this section, the City’s normal, single dry, and five consecutive dry years projected recycled water supplies and demands are integrated and compared. Projected recycled water demands and supplies are detailed in Chapter 6. Under the various water year types, the total annual recycled water supply available 2030 (AF) 2035 (AF) 2040 (AF) 2045 (AF) 2050 (AF)
Supply totals 18,705 18,705 18,705 22,940 22,940
Use totals 11,325 11,489 11,656 11,825 11,996
Surplus/(shortfall) 7,380 7,216 7,049 11,115 10,944
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Supply totals 18,705 18,705 18,705 22,940 22,940
Use totals 11,358 11,522 11,689 11,859 12,031
Surplus/(shortfall) 7,347 7,183 7,016 11,081 10,909
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Supply totals 18,705 18,705 18,705 22,940 22,940
Use totals 11,390 11,556 11,723 11,893 12,066
Surplus/(shortfall) 7,315 7,149 6,982 11,047 10,874
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Supply totals 18,705 18,705 18,705 22,940 22,940
Use totals 11,423 11,589 11,757 11,928 12,100
Surplus/(shortfall) 7,282 7,116 6,948 11,012 10,840
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Supply totals 18,705 18,705 18,705 22,940 22,940
Use totals 11,456 11,622 11,791 11,962 12,135
Surplus/(shortfall) 7,249 7,083 6,914 10,978 10,805
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.

First year OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
Second
year OPTIONAL WSCP Actions
Third
year OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
Fourth
year OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
Fifth
year
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions