WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ALPR FAQ | August 2026
• Other companies also offer ALPR systems. Woodland currently contracts with Flock Safety for its platform.
• The City also contracts for one Motorola Vigilant ALPR camera.
3. What safeguards protect privacy and civil rights?
Short answer: Woodland Police Department Policy 441, coupled with software settings, limits ALPR use to authorized law-enforcement purposes, restricts who may access the system, requires a documented reason for searches, and makes user activity auditable. • The system does not use facial recognition and is not designed to identify a driver or passenger.
• Policy 441 prohibits using ALPR information for personal purposes, harassment or intimidation, or to monitor people engaged in lawful activity.
• Policy 441 also prohibits building databases based on a person’s associations, beliefs, religion, immigration status, political activity, or participation in constitutionally protected events or organizations.
• Access is limited to authorized personnel, and searches are electronically logged to an individual user.
• The Woodland PD complies with all State of California laws governing data use and sharing.
4. Is the City complying with California law governing ALPR use and sharing? Short answer: Yes. The Department’s program is structured to comply with California’s ALPR requirements through a public use-and-privacy policy, defined authorized uses, access records, security safeguards, retention rules, and controls on data sharing. • California Civil Code sections 1798.90.5-1798.90.55 establish requirements for ALPR operators and end users, including written public policies, access logs, reasonable security practices, periodic audits, and limits on sharing.
• Laws, vendor functions, and agency-sharing relationships can change, the Department will continue periodic legal and technical review rather than treating compliance as a one-time determination.
5. How many ALPR cameras are in Woodland?
Short answer: Woodland operates 39 ALPR cameras: 38 Flock cameras and one Motorola Vigilant camera. Woodland PD has been utilizing ALPRs for nearly a decade.
6. Who controls the data, where it is stored, and how long is it kept? Short answer: The Woodland Police Department is the custodian of its ALPR information and controls authorized access. Woodland Police Policy 441 states that visual media is stored in Flock Safety’s cloud platform for 30 days unless preserved as evidence in a criminal investigation. The contract with Flock also limits storage to 30 days before un-preserved data is deleted.
The 30-day retention period provides investigators with a limited window to identify and review relevant vehicle information when a crime is reported after it occurred or when a vehicle’s significance becomes known later in an investigation. This period balances legitimate investigative needs with privacy and data-minimization considerations by ensuring that information without an identified law-enforcement purpose is automatically deleted after 30 days. • Access is limited to authorized users for legitimate law-enforcement purposes. • Search and audit records are retained under Department policy so activity can be reviewed for accountability.
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ALPR FAQ | August 2026
• Calling the Department the “custodian” is more precise than saying the City owns every element of the vendor’s platform or software.
• The City of Woodland regularly audits its data collection. See below to learn more.
7. What does an ALPR camera collect - and what does it not collect? Short answer: The ALPR cameras capture vehicle and license plate images, plate characters, the time and location of detection, and observable vehicle characteristics such as make, model, color, body style, and distinguishing vehicle features.
The system does not:
• Use or have facial-recognition capability.
• Identify the driver or passengers.
• Records conversations or capture audio.
• Track cellphones, read text messages, or access information stored on a phone. • Determine who owns the vehicle solely from the camera image. • Continuously follow a vehicle or show where it is between camera detections.
Furthermore, an ALPR detection is only an investigative lead and must be evaluated within the broader investigative and legal process:
• It does not identify a person’s name, race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, immigration status, or other personal or legally protected information. • It does not determine guilt. A detection (or match) is a lead that requires human review and independent verification, just like other pieces of evidence in an investigation before any law enforcement action is initiated.
• ALPR software is not infallible and may produce inaccurate matches. Investigators, not the software, must use their own judgment, visually review the results, and consider the totality of the investigation to determine whether the correct license plate and vehicle were identified.
8. How has ALPR helped serve Woodland residents and businesses? Short answer: The system has helped officers identify vehicles connected to serious incidents, locate suspects and missing or endangered people, recover stolen vehicles, and develop investigative leads that might not otherwise have been available. • Woodland’s ALPR systems have assisted in investigations involving shootings, kidnapping, felony child abuse, missing or endangered persons, and stolen vehicles. • ALPR is one investigative tool among many; a camera match alone does not solve a case or establish probable cause.
9. How often is the ALPR system audited?
Short answer: Woodland Police Department policy 441 requires an ALPR system audit at least annually. Individual searches, produced both internally and externally, are logged so supervisors can review use for compliance with policy and law.
• Since January 2026, the Woodland Police Department has conducted monthly audits of ALPR activity to ensure the technology is used appropriately and in accordance with department policy by both Department users and by outside agencies with access to Woodland ALPR information.
• Each search is attributable to an individual user and must include a stated law-enforcement purpose.
• The Department may review activity more often when concerns arise, when sharing settings change, or when law or vendor functionality changes.
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ALPR FAQ | August 2026
10. Who can access Woodland ALPR information? Has the City suspended any agencies?
Short answer: Based on audit findings, one agency’s access to our camera system was suspended pending corrective action. The suspension was not related to access by a federal agency or a violation of law.
The Department controls which agencies may receive access to Woodland ALPR information and may approve, limit, suspend, or revoke access.
• The Department continues to monitor agency access and search activity and remove or suspend access immediately if inappropriate or unlawful use is identified. • In addition, the Woodland Police Department strictly adheres to California Senate Bill 34, which restricts the disclosure or transfer of ALPR information to out-of-state and federal entities.
These restrictions do not preclude authorized federal investigators assigned to a joint law- enforcement task force from accessing the system for a legitimate task-force investigation, such as one involving drug trafficking, human trafficking, or violent crime.
11. Can ALPR be used for immigration enforcement, routine traffic enforcement, or tracking lawful activity?
Short answer: Woodland Policy Department policy 441 limits the use of the system to authorized law-enforcement purposes and prohibits use for immigration enforcement, routine traffic enforcement, personal purposes, harassment, intimidation, or monitoring people solely because they are engaged in lawful or constitutionally protected activity.
12. Where can the public find more information?
Short answer: Members of the public can find additional information regarding the Department’s ALPR program, applicable policies, privacy protections, data-sharing restrictions, and governing California law through the resources linked below.
• City of Woodland, “Flock Safety Transparency” (accessed August 6, 2026). Open source • California Civil Code, Title 1.81.23, sections 1798.90.5-1798.90.55 (current official code). Open source • Woodland Police Department ALPR Policy 441 Open source • CA SB 34 Information Bulletin Open source
• CA SB 54 Information Bulletin Open source
Police Department
Semi-Annual Report
January 2026 – June 2026
City Council, September 1, 2026
REPORT ROADMAP
What this report covers
01 Operating challenges & staffing progress
02 Response, call-volume & crime trends
03 Quality-of-life and co-responder efforts
04 ALPR usage, compliance & outcomes
05 Community outreach & 2026 P2 priorities
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT JANUARY–JUNE 2026
EXECUTIVE SNAPSHOT
2026 P1 combined staffing strain with measurable progress
CHALLENGES
• 28% of sworn positions were not fully deployable
• Adapting to support new and outstanding technology
quickly outpacing staff bandwidth
• Repeat offenders & criminal justice system constraints
SUCCESSES
• 10 officers hired during the reporting period
• Priority 1 response time improved 17.7%
• Reported offenses were broadly stable overall
• Homelessness-related calls declined again
Deployable capacity remains the central constraint
Staff continued to sustain core service, enforcement, technology, and outreach work while the department rebuilt deployable staffing.
FIRST-HALF THEME
Progress under pressure
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT JANUARY–JUNE 2026
CHALLENGES & SUCCESSES
Staffing gains are real—but operational capacity still lags 28%
of approved sworn positions were unfilled
or not at full functional capacity
72 APPROVED SWORN POSITIONS
52 fully deployable
3 Vacant
4 Academy
7 Field training
6 Modified duty /
injury
10 officers hired
A meaningful gain during
the reporting period
0 true sworn vacancies
as of September 6, 2026, after
two additional recruits were added
Headcount recovers faster than operational capacity
Academy, field training, and injury recovery can each take about 12 months before full operational capability is restored.
REPORTING-PERIOD SNAPSHOT
20 of 72 positions
not fully deployable
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT Reporting-period values; current vacancy status shown separately.
SERVICE PERFORMANCE
Response times improved while calls for service fell 25%
AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME
5:02
Priority 1
6:07 in 2025 P1
−17.7%
6:49
Priority 2
7:00 in 2025 P1
−2.6%
TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE
27,955
calls in 2026 P1
30,378 calls in 2025 P1
−8.0%
Department prioritized faster response despite staffing shortages The modest decline in calls marginally reduced workload pressure, allowing Priority 1 and Priority 2 response times to improve.
CALLS FOR SERVICE
~13 CFS/day less in 2026
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT JANUARY–JUNE 2026
OFFICER-INITIATED ACTIVITY
Officer-initiated calls fell 26% amid reduced traffic staffing 6,593
officer-initiated calls
8,877 in 2025 P1
−25.7%
2026 P1 ACTIVITY MIX
Traffic stops 3,002
Other 1,952
Follow-up 554
Extra patrol 547
Subject stops 538
Traffic stops accounted for 46%
of officer-initiated activity
Two of three traffic officers were out on disability or injury throughout 2026 P1.
Reduced capacity constrained proactive activity
The reduction in activity is primarily attributable to traffic-unit staffing limitations, not solely to a change in overall enforcement demand.
TRAFFIC UNIT
2 of 3 traffic officers
unavailable
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT JANUARY–JUNE 2026
TRAFFIC & COLLISIONS
Traffic enforcement and collision impacts both declined
ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY
Traffic stops 4,049 → 3,002 −25.9%
Citations 1,935 → 899 −53.5%
DUI arrests 93 → 74 −20.4%
COLLISION OUTCOMES
Property damage 232 → 223 −3.9%
Vehicles in traffic 187 → 156 −16.6%
Persons injured 105 → 78 −25.7%
2025 P1 → 2026 P1
The largest decline was in citations
Enforcement totals reflect reduced traffic staffing; collision indicators also moved downward, including a 26% reduction in persons injured.
PERSONS INJURED
105 → 78
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT JANUARY–JUNE 2026
CRIME OVERVIEW
Reported offenses were broadly stable in the first half 298
677
509
731
307
669
550
740
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Persons Property Society Group B
2025 P1 2026 P1
The overall mix shifted more than the total volume
Person, society, and Group B offenses increased modestly, while property offenses declined slightly.
CATEGORY RANGE
−1.2% to +8.1%
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT JANUARY–JUNE 2026
CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS
Crimes against persons rose 3% as the mix shifted
January–June totals: 298 in 2025 and 307 in 2026
Higher counts in the False Imprisonment and
Domestic Violence categories cause most of
the increase
Simple assault fell by 7, aggravated assault by 6, and combined sexual- assault categories by 8.
-31%
Sexual Assault Offenses
26 → 18
-9%
Aggravated Assaults
68 → 62
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT JANUARY–JUNE 2026
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
2025 2026
CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY
Property offenses held steady as the mix shifted
−1.2%
overall property offenses
Large increases and decreases offset each other
+60
possession of stolen property
27 → 87; largest category increase
−39
vandalism offenses
126 → 87; other larceny and shoplifting also declined
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT JANUARY–JUNE 2026
27 126
114
110
87 87
95 97
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Stolen property
Vandalism
Other larceny
Shoplifting
2026 2025
January–June totals: 677 in 2025 and 669 in 2026
CRIMES AGAINST SOCIETY
Society offenses rose 8%, led by drug violations
January–June totals: 509 in 2025 and 550 in 2026
88 64
77 85
113
82 94
70 84
92 113
97 0
20 40
60 80
100
120
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
2025 2026
Drug and narcotic violations produced 33 of
the 41 additional society offenses.
Drug-equipment violations increased by 4. Weapon-law violations were essentially unchanged, moving from 63 to 62.
+33
drug / narcotic violations
212 → 245
+8.1%
overall society offenses
509 → 550
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT JANUARY–JUNE 2026
QUALITY OF LIFE
Homelessness-related calls fell again in P1
HOST-RELATED CALLS FOR SERVICE
2024 P1 2,521
2025 P1 2,164
2026 P1 2,032
−19.4%
versus 2024 P1
−6.1% versus 2025 P1
HOST sustained service while
operating one officer below its
typical three-officer staffing level.
CO-RESPONDER SERVICE
54 mental-health holds
2025 P1
57 mental-health holds
2026 P1
509
services offered
2025 P1
235
services offered
2026 P1
Despite disruptions within Special Services, the department successfully maintained its overall response capacity.
HOST remained short one officer; one of two co-responders was out due to injury during 2026 P1.
UNHOUSED CALLS
2,032 in 2026 P1
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT JANUARY–JUNE 2026
−6.1%
versus 2025 P1
→
→
PROPERTY & EVIDENCE
2,264 items were taken in while ~28,000 remained in house 2,264
items taken in
Statistics through June 23, 2026
~28,000
items in house
Ongoing storage and disposition workload
1,435
items disposed
Shred, dump, hazmat, ammo, and
other
238
items returned
160 additional items
auctioned
SPECIAL HANDLING
49 firearms
17 to be destroyed
385
drug items
143 to be incinerated
660
DA audio/video requests
fulfilled
78 cases sent to DOJ
for drug testing
Property workload extends well beyond intake
Disposition, evidence requests, firearm destruction, drug incineration, and DOJ testing all add to the unit’s ongoing custody obligations.
ITEMS DISPOSED
1,435 during P1
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT 1/1/2026–6/23/2026
ALPR — USAGE & COMPLIANCE
5,647 searches were conducted by Woodland PD personnel
reads per day
Automated camera volume
5,647
WPD - conducted searches
Top 5 Purposes:
1. Vehicle Theft
2. Assault
3. Stolen Property
4. Weapon Offenses
5. Hit and Run
~200k Reads/Day
Authorized California agencies may conduct searches through the broader ALPR network. Those searches are distinct form WPD’s 5,647 internal searches.
WPD audits searches conducted by our personnel
WPD also audits outside-agency searches involving Woodland data Red flags are reviewed, and access may be restricted or suspended Policy limits are built into how the system is used
✓ WPD Policy §441.2 limits use to legitimate public-safety purposes; ✓ WPD Policy §441.7 restricts sharing and preserves local approval authority. ✓ Comprehensive public-facing ALPR FAQ explains system limits, safeguards, and oversight.
COMPLIANCE
Internal audits help ensure
compliance with policy and law.
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT WOODLAND PD POLICIES 441.2 / 441.7
INTERNAL WPD ACTIVITY
Conducted by trained WPD personnel for
documented public-safety purposes
OUTSIDE AGENCY ACCESS
Shared Access.
Continued WPD oversight.
ALPR — OPERATIONAL OUTCOMES
Several Woodland cases demonstrate ALPR system’s operational value
LOCATE & RECOVER IDENTIFY & APPREHEND
Assault with a deadly weapon
Located the suspect vehicle and arrested the suspect.
Hit and run
Compared pre- and post-collision images showing new vehicle damage.
Stolen vehicle recovered
An in-car alert led officers to a reported stolen vehicle.
Assault with a vehicle
Located the vehicle and arrested the driver the next day.
Stolen U-Haul truck
Located the vehicle and arrested the suspect.
Restraining-order violation
A vehicle search helped locate a felony-probation suspect.
The value is operational—not merely analytical
Searches helped officers connect vehicles to suspects, compare evidence over time, recover stolen vehicles, and make arrests.
DOCUMENTED EXAMPLES
Multiple successes
beyond cases noted above
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT JANUARY–JUNE 2026
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
Outreach expanded and satisfaction improved
1,522
volunteer hours
Estimated value: $52,950
22 volunteers • 23 Watch groups • 28 NNO areas
85%
positive satisfaction
Up from 75% in 2025 P1
Neutral/mixed 9% • Negative 6%
3.15M
Instagram views
97,533 engagements
658K
Facebook views
52,210 engagements
Instagram 97,533 engagements • Facebook 52,210
Outreach combined service with broad digital reach
Volunteer participation, neighborhood organizing, satisfaction results, and social media each strengthened the department’s connection with the community.
POSITIVE SURVEY
85% in 2026 P1
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT JANUARY–JUNE 2026
SECOND-HALF PRIORITIES
Four priorities will guide July through December 2026 (2026 P2) 04 Reduce homelessness-related incidents and repeat calls The priorities reinforce one another
Restored deployable capacity supports faster response, sustained enforcement, and more consistent quality- of-life follow-up.
PLANNING HORIZON
July–December 2026
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT JANUARY–JUNE 2026
01 Stabilize staffing and deployable capacity
02 RESPONSE Improve emergency response performance
03 CRIME Sustain crime reduction
QUALITY OF LIFE
STAFFING
WOODLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Progress continued despite capacity constraints
10 officers hired
−17.7%
Priority 1 response time
Broadly stable
reported offenses
−19.4%
unhoused-related calls vs. 2024
The department’s second-half challenge is to convert hiring progress into independently deployable capacity—without losing the service gains achieved in the first half.
Thank you • Questions
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: September 1, 2026
ITEM #: I.12
SUBJECT: Fire Department Semi-Annual Status Report
Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Fire Department Semi-Annual Status Report for January-June 2026.
Staff Contact:
Eric Zane, Fire Chief (530) 661-5861, [email protected]
Background:
The Fire Department Semi-Annual Status Report includes a summary of activity within the Department. In lieu of providing comprehensive monthly or quarterly status reports to the City Council, the City Council receives status reports on a semi-annual basis.
Discussion:
This report summarizes Fire Department activities and accomplishments from January through June 2026, with a focus on Administration, Operations, and Community Risk Reduction.
Administrative Division
Personnel Updates
• During the reporting period, one Engineer was promoted to Fire Captain and one firefighter was promoted to Engineer. To address vacancies due to attrition, the Department also onboarded five firefighters, including its first lateral firefighter and four recruit firefighters successfully completed academy training and began working operational shifts.
Administrative Systems and Efficiency
• Administrative staff continued expanding use of the First Due records management system to improve data management, reporting accuracy, inspection tracking, and operational analytics.
Engine company and Community Risk Reduction inspections are now routinely documented and tracked through the system.
Regional Coordination
• Following the dissolution of the Elkhorn Fire Protection District on June 30th, the Department continued coordination with LAFCo, Yolo County, and the City of West Sacramento regarding the transition of fire protection services in the former district.
ISO Rating
• During the first 6 months of this year, staff prepared for and met with the Insurance Service Office (ISO), auditing fire protection within the City of Woodland. The department is happy to announce that the City’s ISO rating of 2 has not changed (1 is best and 10 represents zero fire protection).
Operations
Calls for Service and Response Performance
• The Department responded to 4,301 calls for service, a 1.15% decrease from the previous six- month reporting period. Average response time improved by 11 seconds to 4 minutes and 26 seconds. For priority calls, 1,437 responses had a travel time of four minutes or less, 720 were between four and five minutes, and 836 exceeded five minutes. The Department's travel-time goal remains four minutes or less 90% of the time.
Fire Outcomes:
• The Department contained 70% of applicable structure fires to the room of origin, compared with a goal of 80%. Reported pre-incident property value totaled $71,603,320, with $71,060,370 in property value saved and $542,950 in fire loss.
Automatic Aid
• Woodland received automatic aid 49 times and provided automatic aid 51 times during the reporting period, supporting regional coverage and response to significant incidents.
Training
• Department personnel completed 8,313 hours of fire and operations training, 1,539 hours of EMS training, and 1,850.5 hours of physical-fitness training. Specialized training included a Lithium Battery Response course, grant-funded tiller training completed by department staff, and "Access Granted - Through the Lock" training to improve non-destructive access techniques.
Cause of Ignition
• Fire investigations identified 59 intentional fires, 56 unintentional fires, 10 fires attributed to failure of equipment or a heat source, three caused by acts of nature, nine with the cause still under investigation, and 58 with the cause undetermined after investigation.
Apparatus
• Tiller training began in February as the new apparatus moved toward operational readiness. In April, the Department received two new fire engines, allowing older apparatus to transition to reserve status and supporting the planned retirement of three existing units as the fleet is right-sized.
Field Activities
• Engine companies completed 192 inspections and continued fire-safety education, including the first-grade fire-safety program at local elementary schools. Crews also documented 497 contacts involving unhoused individuals and 390 cancellations to non-emergent medical calls at medical facilities.
Squad Deployment
• Department staff continued to staff the two-person unit, responding to lower acuity calls for service, as well as supporting more complex, and labor intensive incidents. When deployed, the squad responded to on average, 30% of the daily call volume, allowing the suppression apparatus to remain available for more complex or emergent 911 calls.
Community Risk Reduction
The Community Risk Reduction (CRR) Division continued to advance the City of Woodland's public safety priorities through proactive fire prevention, public education, inspections, plan review, code enforcement, and interdepartmental coordination. First Due continues to improve workflow and inspection tracking.
Inspection and Plan Review Activity
• CRR staff recorded 859 hours of inspections, 298 hours of plan review, and 185.25 hours of construction-related activity. The semi-annual report also identifies 180 California Office of the State Fire Marshal mandated inspections, which are tracked as annual compliance inspections.
CRR Workload
• The three-person CRR staff recorded 2,340 total work hours, including 1,951 committed hours and 112 hours of completed formal training. The report reflects an average of approximately four uncommitted work hours per week.
Community Outreach
• CRR staff participated in 13 community events totaling 52 hours of outreach, including the Woodland Senior Resource Fair and a two-day safety training for Clark Pacific staff.
Social Media:
• Department outreach continued through social media. Facebook recorded approximately 654,500 views, 38,000 interactions, and 11,000 followers across 50 posts. Instagram recorded approximately 140,439 views, 4,900 interactions, and 10,500 followers across 24 posts.
Conclusion:
The Fire Department continued to advance department priorities through effective administration, improved operational performance, extensive training, proactive fire prevention, and community engagement. The semi-annual data reflects continued efforts to protect life and property while improving readiness, accountability, and service delivery.
Prepared by: Nallely Castro, Management Analyst
Reviewed by: Eric Zane, Fire Chief
Attachments:
1. Semi Annual Report- January June 2026 (1)
J A N U A R Y 1 - J U N E 3 0 , 2 0 2 6
*When two or three (dependent on area) engine/truck companies are committed to calls simultaneously, the remaining engine/truck companies move strategically into the vacated area(s) to ensure adequate coverage based upon the number of available apparatus. This practice is called a “move up”.
Automatic
Aid
Training Hours
Total Calls for Service
Average Response Time
E N G I N E C O M P A N Y
Inspections
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
4301
4:26
What types of calls did we run?
Calls for Service Comparison
C O N T A I N E D F I R E T O R O O M
O F O R I G I N
C O N T A I N E D F I R E T O R O O M
O F O R I G I N
P R E I N C I D E N T V A L U E
S A V E D
70%
$71,060,370
Goal: 80% of the time
Loss
$542,950
Aid Given
Aid Received
49 51
Automatic aid is
provided to another
agency through
formal agreement
and occurs
automatically on
significant events
without any special
request. .
Priority Calls
Travel Time Goal of 4 Minutes or Less 90% of the Time
Cause of Ingnition
Jan-Jun 2026
1 . 1 5 % d e c r e a s e d
f r o m J u n - D e c 2 0 2 5
1 1 s e c o n d s d e c r e a s e d
f r o m J u n - D e c 2 0 2 5
$71,603,320
192
Jan-Jun 2026 Training Hours Snapshot
C A N C E L L E D T O
N O N - E M E R G E N E N T
390
Medical aids cancelled at
medical facilities
U N H O U S E D C O N T A C T S
497
J A N U A R Y 1 - J U N E 3 0 , 2 0 2 6
Formal
Completed
Training Hours
112
Total
Committed
Total Worked
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
1951
2,340
What types of duties did we complete?
P L A N R E V I E W H O U R S
I N S P E C T I O N H O U R S
C O N S T R U C T I O N H O U R S
C A O S F M
298
180
185.25
859
1 Hour
Average time spent per inspection:
1 Hour
COMMUNITY RISK
REDUCTION
Community Risk Reduction (CRR) is a process to identify and prioritize local risks, followed by the integrated and strategic investment of resources (emergency response and prevention) to reduce their occurrence and impact.
Community Outreach
Jan- June 2026
Inspection & Plan Review
Uncommitted
Work per Week
04 Average time spent per plan set:
Average time spent per inspection:
45 Minutes
Completed Annually
Mandated Inspections
3 Full Time CRR
Department Staff
Social Media InsightsSocial Media InsightsSocial Media Insights Community EventsCommunity Events
1313EventsEvents
52 52 Hours TotalHours Total
4 hour average time4 hour average time
Community Events
13Events
52 Hours Total
4 hour average time
Facebook
654,500 Views
50 Posts
38K Interations
11K Followers
Instagram
140,439M Views
24Posts
4.9K Interactions
10.5K Followers
COMMUNITY RISK
REDUCTION HOURS