Radar Speed Zone Surveys
2) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 3) Accident records.
4) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
Rounding Speed Limit to the Nearest 5 mph of the 85th Percentile 21400. (a) The Department of Transportation shall, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to this code, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs placed pursuant to Section 21364.
(b) The Department of Transportation shall, after notice and public hearing, determine and publicize the specifications for uniform types of warning signs, lights, and devices to be placed upon a highway by a person engaged in performing work that interferes with or endangers the safe movement of traffic upon that highway. (c) Only those signs, lights, and devices as are provided for in this section shall be placed upon a highway to warn traffic of work that is being performed on the highway. (d) Control devices or markings installed upon traffic barriers on or after January 1, 1984, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications required by this section.
Maximum Speed Limit
22349. (a) Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person may drive a vehicle upon a two-lane, undivided highway at a speed greater than 55 miles per hour unless that highway, or portion thereof, has been posted for a higher speed by the Department of Transportation or appropriate local agency upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. For purposes of this subdivision, the following apply:
(1) A two-lane, undivided highway is a highway with not more than one through lane of travel in each direction.
(2) Passing lanes may not be considered when determining the number of through lanes.
Radar Speed Zone Surveys
(c) It is the intent of the Legislature that there be reasonable signing on affected two-lane, undivided highways described in subdivision (b) in continuing the 55 miles-per-hour speed limit, including placing signs at county boundaries to the extent possible, and at other appropriate locations.
Basic Speed Law
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.
Speed Law Violations
22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.
Prima Facie Speed Limits
22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and the same shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. 3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.
2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. Such prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard “SCHOOL” warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
Radar Speed Zone Surveys
3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented.
A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.
Increase of Local Limits
22357. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may be by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hours, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.
Decrease of Local Limits
22358. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45,40,35,30, or 25 miles per hours, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.
Decrease on Narrow Street
22358.3. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.
Radar Speed Zone Surveys
Decrease on Local Streets Near Schools or Senior Centers 22358.4. (a) (1) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by subdivision (b) of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey. (2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the school zone.
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration. (5) (A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (B) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away
Radar Speed Zone Surveys
from school grounds.
(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from the school grounds.
(D) A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs incurred by the department under this subdivision.
Downward Speed Zoning
22358.5 It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.
Rounding of Speed Limits to the Nearest 5 mph of the 85th Percentile 22358.6. (a) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. (b) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded down to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may lower the speed limit by five miles per hour from the nearest five mile per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with Sections 627 and 22358.5 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on March 30, 2021, if the reasons for the lower speed limit are documented in an engineering and traffic survey. The Department of Transportation or a local authority may also take into consideration Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, if applicable. (c) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment. If the speed limit is rounded down pursuant to this subdivision, the speed limit shall not be reduced any further pursuant to subdivision (b). (d) In addition to subdivisions (b) and (c), a local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Section 22358.7.
(e) The total reduction in the speed limit pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, shall not exceed 12.4 miles per hour from the 85th percentile speed. (f) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive, a local authority may retain the currently adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction.
Reduction of Additional 5 mph
22358.7. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2) The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high
Radar Speed Zone Surveys
concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. (b) (1) As used in this section, “safety corridor” shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System. (2) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). In making this determination, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway. (c) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner. (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Retaining the Currently Adopted Speed Limit or Restoring Immediately Prior Adopted Speed Limit 22358.8 (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit.
(b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Business Activity District
22358.9 (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour.
(2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (b) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages,
Radar Speed Zone Surveys
or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Section 22358.7, has retained the currently adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8, or has restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8. (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Boundary Line Streets
22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.
Multiple-Lane Highways
22361. On multiple-lane highways with two or more separate roadways, different prima facie speed limits may be established for different roadways under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.
Speed Trap Prohibition
40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.
Speed Trap
40802. (a) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving objects. This subdivision does not apply to local street, road, school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.
Radar Speed Zone Surveys
(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section, “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. (3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity district” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section.
(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C)(i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D).
(ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 223469, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three
Radar Speed Zone Surveys
years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
(B) (i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II)If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years.
(ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.
Speed Trap Evidence.
40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap.
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) 40802.
Radar Speed Zone Surveys
Study Method
Speed zones are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.
The study is conducted in accordance with the appropriate sections of the California Vehicle Code and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), Section 2B-13, Speed Limit Sign (R2-D)
Surveys are conducted on arterial streets, collector streets, and selected local streets. Each of the selected streets was analyzed individually.
The accident analysis was based on a review of the City’s Traffic Accident Records (Crossroads). Only non-intersection accidents are included since intersection accidents are considered correctable using conventional intersection traffic controls such as stop signs or traffic signals.
Accident rates were computed using a formula that takes into account the number of accidents in the two-year period, the length of roadway being studied, and the average daily traffic volume. The rate is expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles (Acc/MVM). The formula is:
Acc/MM = Number of Accidents x 1,000,000
Distance x ADT x No. of Days
Definitions of Terms
Average Daily Traffic Volume of traffic during a 24-hour period.
ECL Easterly City Limit (also WCL, NCL and SCL for Westerly, Northerly and Southerly).
85th Percentile (Critical Speed) The “speed” which 85% of the observed vehicles are not exceeding.
This speed is usually within 2 mph of the upper limit of the speed.
Mean Speed The average speed.
MPH or mph Miles Per Hour.
MVM or mvm Million Vehicle Miles. Accident rates are generally expressed as the number of accidents occurring per million vehicle miles traveled during a given time period.
Pace The 10 mph range of observed vehicle speeds containing the largest number of vehicles. A normal distribution will contain
approximately 70% of the sample within the pace, with 15% above and 15% below.
APPENDIX B
Speed Zoning Regulations from Caltrans
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 133
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Standard:
03 If used, the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall be placed in the roadway at the crosswalk location on the center line, on a lane line, or on a median island. The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall not be post-mounted on the left-hand or right-hand side of the roadway. 04 If used, the Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall be placed over the roadway at the crosswalk location.
05 An In-Street or Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall not be placed in advance of the crosswalk to educate road users about the State law prior to reaching the crosswalk, nor shall it be installed as an educational display that is not near any crosswalk.
Guidance:
06 If an island (see Chapter 3I) is available, the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign, if used, should be placed on the island.
Option:
07 If a Pedestrian Crossing (W11-2) warning sign is used in combination with an In-Street or an Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign, the W11-2 sign with a diagonal downward pointing arrow (W16-7P) plaque may be post-mounted on the right-hand side of the roadway at the crosswalk location.
Standard:
08 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign and the Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall not be used at signalized locations controlled approaches.
09 The STOP FOR legend shall only be used in States where the State law specifically requires that a driver must stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk.
10 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall have a black legend (except for the red STOP or YIELD sign symbols) and border on a white background, surrounded by an outer yellow or fluorescent yellowgreen background area (see Figure 2B-2). The Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall have a black legend and border on a yellow or fluorescent yellow-green background at the top of the sign and a black legend and border on a white background at the bottom of the sign (see Figure 2B-2). 11 Unless the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign is placed on a physical island, the sign support shall be designed to bend over and then bounce back to its normal vertical position when struck by a vehicle.
Support:
12 The Provisions of Section 2A.18 concerning mounting height are not applicable for the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign.
Standard:
13 The top of an In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall be a maximum of 4 feet above the pavement surface. The top of an In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign placed in an island shall be a maximum of 4 feet above the island surface.
Option:
14 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign may be used seasonably seasonally to prevent damage in winter because of plowing operations, and may be removed at night if the pedestrian activity at night is minimal. 15 In-Street Pedestrian Crossing signs, Overhead Pedestrian Crossing signs, and Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs may be used together at the same crosswalk.
Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
00 The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public.
Artificially low speed limits can lead to poor compliance as well as large variations in speed within the traffic stream. Increased speed variance can also create more conflicts and passing maneuvers. 00a The most effective way to reduce speeds is through a combination of strategies using traffic control devices related to speed management, roadway design and engineering solutions, traffic calming techniques and measures, public education, Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs
November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 134
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) and enforcement efforts. Effectively managing road user speed relies on numerous factors, which include enforcement, roadway characteristics, surrounding environment, adjacent land use, and traffic control devices. Many studies find that engineering changes, such as change a road’s infrastructure, are one of the most important factors in reducing vehicle operating speeds. Engineering changes are also one of the most effective interventions at reducing pedestrian injury and fatality rates. Potential street engineering changes, such as curb extensions, median islands, raised crosswalks, roundabouts, and speed bumps or speed humps, naturally result in lower speeds. It is realized that these engineering changes can be costly and time-consuming to implement.
Standard:
01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles. 02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study. The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph.
03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another.
04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable. 05 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and, where appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.
Support:
06 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:
A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets, that is established by State law; or
B. As altered speed zones – based on engineering studies. 07 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a particular road, notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate.
Option:
08 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on the streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2-5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD (R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see Figure 2B-3).
Guidance:
09 A Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign (see Section 2C.38) should be used to inform road users of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 mph, or where engineering judgment indicates the need for advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead. 10 States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 14 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes. 11 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly. 12 When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th-percentile speed of freeflowing traffic.
CVC Section 22358.6 – 85th-Percentile, Rounding, 5 mph Increment, 5 mph speed reduction and Maximum Speed Reduction
Standard:
12a When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic (CVC Section 22358.6(a)), except as shown in the two Options below for rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC Section 22358.6(b)), or rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), or if using Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs
November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 135
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) additional 5 mph speed reduction on local agency roadways for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)).
Option:
1. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. CVC Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, may also be considered, if applicable. See Standard below for documentation requirements. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(b).
2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(b). Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(c).
Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. Refer to Section 22358.6(b).
12c The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment (CVC Section 22358.6(a)), rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC Section22358.6(b)), additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)), this speed reduction shall not exceed
12.4 mph from the 85th-percentile speed. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(e).
Support:
12d Refer to Tables 2B-103(CA) and 2B-104(CA), which provides examples of 85th-percentile speed values and the application of the speed limit policies and criteria applicable per CVC 22358.6 and 22358.7. 12e Any existing E&TS that was performed before January 1, 2022 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is not required to be updated until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 14 year criteria.
CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 – Applicability on State Highway System & Local Agency Roadways Standard:
12f CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies shall not be applicable to roadways on the State Highway System.
Support:
12g CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are applicable on local agency roadways. 12h CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are also applicable on any privately owned and maintained roads or commercial establishments, if the private road or private property has been subjected to the CVC application by the private property owner or a particular city or county enacts an ordinance or resolution to this effect. Refer to CVC Sections 21100, 21100.1, 21107, 21107.5, 21107.6, and 21107.7.
Standard:
12i The additional 5 mph speed reduction allowed by CVC Section 22358.7 on designated safety corridors or on portions of highway adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System 12j The option allowed by CVC Section 22358.8 to retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit, shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System. 12k Declaring prima facie speed limits of 25 mph or 20 mph on a highway contiguous to a business activity district allowed by CVC Section 22358.9 shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System.
CVC Section 22358.7 – Safety corridor and Land or Facilities Generating High Concentrations of Bicyclists and Pedestrians
Standard:
12l Additional lowering of the speed limits from those calculated using rounding (up or down) per CVC Section 22358.6(b) and 22358.6(c) and 5 mph speed reduction using CVC Section 22358.6(b), as included in paragraph 12a, Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs
November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 136
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) and Options #1 and #2 processes, is prohibited, except for the local agency roadway segments designated as “safety corridor” or “land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians” in compliance with CVC Sections 22358.6(d) and 22358.7.
Option:
12m Local agencies may additionally lower the speed limits by 5 mph from those calculated using rounding (up or down) per CVC Section 22358.6(b) and 22358.6(c) and 5 mph speed reduction using CVC Section 22358.6(b) if, after completing an E&TS, find that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, for either of the following reasons:
1. The portion of a highway has been designated as a safety corridor.
2. The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1) – “Safety Corridor” Definition Standard:
12n A safety corridor shall be defined as a roadway segment within an overall roadway network where the highest number of serious injury and fatality crashes occur.
12o One or more crash weighting factors, as provided in Paragraph 12p, of this section shall be used to prioritize the locations of fatal and serious injury crashes in developing the “Safety Corridor”.
Option:
12p The crash weighting factors to prioritize the locations of fatal and serious injury crashes in developing the "Safety Corridor" may include, but are not limited to, the factors included in Table 2B-105(CA). 12q Data used to determine a safety corridor may be from the most recent Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) performed.
The crash data source may include, but is not limited to, California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS).
Standard:
12r The prioritized subset of safety corridors shall:
1. Identify specific locations with high crash occurrences.
2. Identify corridor-level segments with a pattern of crash reoccurrence.
3. Be able to be stratified by mode.
12s Safety corridors shall represent a prioritized subset of the overall roadway network within an authority’s responsibilities and shall not exceed one-fifth of the overall roadway network.
Guidance:
12t A jurisdiction should use three to five years of the most recent crash data to determine a safety corridor based on Fatal and Serious Injury data.
Option:
12u For crash coverage, safety corridors may identify the subset of the overall roadway network where a minimum of 25% of the Fatal + Serious Injury (F+SI) crashes occur.
12v To identify logical termini, the geographic extent of a safety corridor may be determined by non-engineering staff.
Standard:
12w A licensed professional engineer shall sign off on logical termini identified for a safety corridor using existing E&TS.
Option:
12x Crash/Volume rate may be used to provide additional locations to be included in the safety corridor. Local agencies may use proactive measures as indicators.
CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2) – “Land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians” definition Standard:
12y Except for the Option in first paragraph below, a land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians shall be defined as the portion of the highway where one or more of any of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA) are present within a distance of 1320 feet.
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised April 1, 2025 Part 2 – Signs
November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 137
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Option:
12z Crash data that demonstrates a highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three-to-five-year period may be used in lieu of one of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA).
Standard:
12aa A highway segment shall be defined as the portion of the highway where a location that meets the aforementioned criteria is present within a distance of 1320 feet.
Option:
12ab A highway segment may be longer than 1320 feet provided that a minimum of one location within the top twenty percent of fatal and serious injury pedestrian and/or bicyclist crashes within a three-to-five-year period is present for every 1320 feet.
Standard:
12ac The top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injury crashes within a three to five year period shall be based on the geographic area within the jurisdiction of the Engineer performing the E&TS.
Option:
12ad A high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists may be longer than 1320 feet provided that a minimum of one generator is present for every 1320 feet.
12ae Data used to determine high concentration locations may be obtained from the most recently performed Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS).
Standard:
12af The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7 to additionally lower the speed limit (by designating safety corridor or on portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians), shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner.
CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) Option:
12ag Local agency may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8.
Standard:
12ah Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.
12ai If local agency decides to use lower speed limit based on CVC Section 22358.8, after completing an E&TS and finding that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. Refer to CVC Section 22358.8(b).
CVC Section 22358.9 – Business Activity District
Option:
12aj A local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 mph prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 mph if the highway segment meets all of the following conditions:
1. A maximum of four traffic lanes.
2. A maximum posted 30 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 mph speed limit.
3. A maximum posted 25 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 mph speed limit.
12ak A “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets a least three of the following four requirements:
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs
November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 138
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California)
4. No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
5. Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway.
6. Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
7. Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device.
Standard:
12al A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted for designated safety corridors (CV Section 22358.7) or using the land or facility adjacent to high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists (CVC Section 22358.7) or retained the currently adopted speed limit (CVC Section 22358.8) or have restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit (CVC Section 22358.8). Refer to CVC Section 22358.9(c).
13 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately 1/2 mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for the 85th-percentile speed.
Support:
14 Advance warning signs and other traffic control devices to attract the motorist’s attention to a signalized intersection are usually more effective than a reduced speed limit zone.
Guidance:
15 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.08) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this situation.
Option:
16 Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:
A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace;
C. Roadside development and environment;
D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and
E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period. 17 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime information or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and other vehicles.
18 A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times. 19 A changeable message sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.
Guidance:
20 If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend YOUR SPEED XX MPH or such similar legend should be displayed. The color of the changeable message legend should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.
Support:
21 Advisory Speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.08 and 2C.14. Temporary Traffic Control Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed Limit sign is discussed in Section 6F.12. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.15. 22 Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413; also, pertinent sections are found in Sections 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.
23 Refer to Part 6, Section 6C.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs in school areas.
Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:
24 CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs
November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 139
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Standard:
25 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by Caltrans, consideration of all of the following:
A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
B. Collision records.
C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
Guidance:
26 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 27 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:
A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.
B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,
C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.
D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section. If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.
E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.
F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.
G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.
H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.
I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 miles should be avoided, except in transition areas.
J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.
K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.
L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.
Support:
28 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC 22358.5.
Option:
29 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:
A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 miles, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 miles the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 miles but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph 1 or 2 above.
B. Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. 30 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:
1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Caltrans District Traffic Engineer. The data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
• A north arrow
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs
November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 140
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) • Engineer's station or post mileage
• Limits of the proposed zones
• Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone. • Collision rates for the zones involved
• Average daily traffic volume
• Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
• If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel • Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile b. A report to the District Director that includes:
• The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
• Recommendations and supporting reasons.
• The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials. • The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.
2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets. a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares.
31 In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency. 32 Any agency may lower the speed limit below the prima facie speed limit after performing, and based on the results of an E&TS.
Guidance:
33 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.
Support:
34 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surfaces in collision histories. 35 Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed. Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile do not ordinarily facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. 36 The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.
Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 141
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Option:
37 When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.
Guidance:
38 Speed zones of less than 0.5 miles and short transition zones should be avoided.
Signs
Standard:
39 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used to give notice of a prima facie or maximum speed limit except as provided under Prima Facie Speed Limits in CVC 22352.
40 When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 MAXIMUM (R6-3(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign.
41 The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 MAXIMUM (R6-4(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following the R6-3(CA) sign.
Guidance:
42 The R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are permitted.
Option:
43 The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life. 44 The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue.
On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.
Support:
45 Refer to CVC Section 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.
Option:
46 The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a reduced speed zone.
Standard:
47 The R2-4(CA) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone where the reduced speed limit applies.
48 The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone. 49 The R3(CA) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone.
Option:
50 The R3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used with the TRUCK (M4-4) plaque to mark the end of truck speed zones on descending grades.
Standard:
51 Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones.
Option:
52 Where speed zones are longer than 1 mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. For three or more lanes in each direction, dual installation may be used.
Standard:
53 The Speed Limit (R2-1) and End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, as appropriate shall be placed at the end of all restricted speed zones.
54 Freeways with 65 mph and those segments where a speed limit of 70 mph has been approved by Caltrans, with approval by the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• At the segment entrance, R2-1 signs shall be installed right of traffic off of the right shoulder. • R2-1 signs shall also be installed off of the right shoulder only, throughout the segment, at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 142
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Option:
• The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.
Standard:
• The R6-3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment. • The R6-4(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R6-3(CA) sign.
Option:
• The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.
Standard:
• Signs shall be placed in protected locations.
• At the end of the 70/65 mph segment, R2-1 signs shall be installed off of the right shoulder. 55 Freeway segments where a 55 mph speed limit has been approved by Caltrans, with the approval of the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder and left shoulder where the median is of sufficient width to permit sign maintenance without lane closures.
Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on the right shoulder, on approximate 3 mile intervals, with no more than 3 interchanges between signs.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
56 Conventional highways with 55 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
Standard:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.
Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on approximate 5 to 10 mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
Conventional highways with 65 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment should be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder. • Subsequent signs should then be posted at 5 to 10 mile intervals and after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
Option:
57 Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (see Section 3B.21) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.
Standard:
58 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs giving maximum statewide speed limits for various types of vehicles shall be installed on all State highways near the points of entrance into California.
Guidance:
59 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the approaching motorists.
Standard:
60 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with posted speed limits of 65 mph or 70 mph at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.
Option:
61 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 143
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Standard:
62 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 65 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.
63 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at approximately 3 mile intervals with no more than 3 interchanges between signs. 64 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.
Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
65 The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.
Guidance:
66 One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.
Support:
67 The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment of roadway.
Option:
68 The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2- 1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar.
Guidance:
69 When used, the R48-1(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.
Option:
70 The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.
Standard:
71 The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.
Guidance:
72 The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25 mile intervals. See Figure 3B105(CA).
Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs
Option:
73 A Vehicle Speed Feedback sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
Standard:
74 If a Vehicle Speed Feedback sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend shall be YOUR SPEED XX.
The numerals displaying the speed shall be white, yellow, yellow-green or amber color on black background. When activated, lights shall be steady-burn conforming to the provisions of CVC Sections 21466 and 21466.5. Vehicle Speed Feedback signs shall not alternatively be operated as variable speed limit signs.
Guidance:
75 To the degree practical, numerals for displaying approach speeds should be similar font and size as numerals on the corresponding Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
Option:
76 When used, the Vehicle Speed Feedback sign may be mounted on either a separate support or on the same support as the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
77 In lieu of lights, legend may be retroreflective film for flip-disk systems. 78 The legend YOUR SPEED may be white on black plaque located above the changeable speed display.
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 144
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Support:
79 Driver comprehension may improve when the Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign is mounted on the same support below the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
80 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs are appropriate for use with advisory speed signs and with temporary signs in temporary traffic control zones.
Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – See CVC 22350 & 22352 Support:
81 The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Standard:
82 Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.
Option:
83 Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a lower speed.
Use of Metric System Designations – See CVC 21351.3
Option:
84 Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.
Guidance:
85 If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting on signs on local streets and roads.
Support:
86 Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.
Standard:
87 Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways. For use in this California MUTCD, 70 mph shall be shown as a metric equivalent of 110 km/h, neither of which shall be used on any local street or road.
Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
88 Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits on State highways is given to Caltrans District Directors. The District Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 65 mph on State highways. The Director of Caltrans retains the authority to approve variable, minimum, and maximum speeds up to 70 mph on State freeways.
Standard:
89 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS).
Option:
90 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.
Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - See CVC 22355
Option:
91 The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever Caltrans determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits. • Caltrans may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which, if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night. • Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 145
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - See CVC 22400
Option:
92 The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever Caltrans determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that slow speeds on any part of a state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, Caltrans may determine and declare a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment. • A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law.
Speed Traps
Support:
93 Refer to CVC 40802 for Speed Traps.
Standard:
94 A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district.
Support:
95 Senior zone is an area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign pursuant to CVC Section 22352.
96 Business activity district is a section of highway described in CVC Section 22358.9(b) in which a standard 25 mph or 20 mph speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to CVC Section 22358.9(a)(1).
Standard:
97 A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. 98 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation. 99 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using laser or other electronic device (other than radar) and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional approved certified training. • The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
Option:
100 This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to fourteen years when all of the above conditions are met and no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.
Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
101 Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4) for trucks travelling downhill, should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on descending grades of less than 1 mile.
Support:
102 To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs
November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 146
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Standard:
103 Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys. An analysis of collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.
Guidance:
104 Posted speeds should be on the low side of the scale, generally within the pace of loaded commercial vehicles.
Standard:
105 If warranted, the Caltrans District Director shall issue a standard speed zone order.
Support:
106 Posting of the regulation will be by placement of a standard 36 x 45 inch Speed Limit (R2-1) sign with a TRUCK (M4-4) plate above.
Standard:
107 A standard End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign with TRUCK (M4-4) plate shall be posted at the end of the truck zone when appropriate.
Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
108 For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6C.01 in Part 6.
Speed Zones and Traffic Signals
Standard:
109 An agency changing the speed limits within its jurisdiction shall report the speed limit change to the agency operating and maintaining traffic signals within the speed zone no later than 30 days before changing the posted speed limit.
Support:
110 Changing the signal timing and adjusting the advance detector loops based on the revised speed limits can enhance the operations of the traffic signal.
Section 2B.14 Truck Speed Limit Plaque (R2-2P)
Standard:
01 Where a special speed limit applies to trucks or other vehicles, the legend TRUCKS XX or such similar legend shall be displayed below the legend Speed Limit XX on the same sign or on a separate R2-2P plaque (see Figure 2B-3) below the standard legend.
02 The Truck Speed Limit (R2-2) sign shall not be used in California. The TRUCK (M4-4) plaque placed above the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used instead.
03 The TRUCK (M4-4) plaque shall be placed above the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign to indicate the truck speed limit. It shall also be placed above the End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign to mark the end of truck speed limits.
Support:
04 Refer to Section 2B.13 for more details.
Section 2B.15 Night Speed Limit Plaque (R2-3P)
Standard:
01 Where different speed limits are prescribed for day and night, both limits shall be posted.
Guidance:
02 A Night Speed Limit (R2-3P) plaque (see Figure 2B-3) should be reversed using a white retroreflectorized legend and border on a black background.
Option:
03 A Night Speed Limit plaque may be combined with or installed below the standard Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
Support:
04 Refer to CVC 22355.
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised March 27, 2020 Part 2 – Signs
____________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 258
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Table 2B-1(CA). California Regulatory Sign and Plaque Sizes (Sheet 7 of 7)
Sign or Plaque Sign
Designation Section
Conventional Road
Single Expressway Freeway Minimum Oversized
Lane
MultiLane
FREEWAY - ACCESS RIGHTS
RESTRICTED ON THIS SECTION OF
HIGHWAY
S3-1(CA) 2B.39 30 x 24 30 x 24 --- --- --- ---
STATE PROPERTY - NO DUMPING -
NO PARKING - NO TRESPASSING S8(CA) 2B.111 36 x 22 36 x 22 --- --- --- ---
STATE PROPERTY - ANY PERSON
REMOVING OR MOLESTING SAME
WILL BE PROSECUTED
S20(CA) 2B.111 24 x 18 24 x 18 --- --- --- ---
Weigh Station Repair Service plaque S21(CA) 2B.60 36 x 24 36 x 24 --- --- --- --- Rest Area/Vista Point 8 HOUR
PARKING S23(CA) 2B.46,
2I.05 24 x 24 24 x 24 --- --- --- ---
DAYLIGHT HEADLIGHT SECTION S30-1(CA) 2B.64 84 x 54 84 x 54 --- --- --- ---
TURN ON HEADLIGHTS NEXT X
MILES S30-2(CA) 2B.64 108 x 54 108 x 54 --- --- --- ---
END DAYLIGHT HEADLIGHT
SECTION S30-3(CA) 2B.64 84 x 66 84 x 66 --- --- --- --- TURN ON HEADLIGHTS S30-4(CA) 2B.64 84 x 42 84 x 42 --- --- --- --- CHECK HEADLIGHTS S30-5(CA) 2B.64 84 x 42 84 x 42 --- --- --- --- Safety Corridor Sign S33(CA) 2B.64 102 x 48 102 x 48 --- --- --- --- Table 2B-101(CA). Standard Application of Speed Limits per California Vehicle Code Speed Determined
by Roadway Facility CVC Section
15 mph State or
local authority
Railroad grade crossing with obstructed view
Uncontrolled highway intersection with obstructed view An alley
22352.a.1
15 & 20 mph State or
local authority
Where the prima facie speed of 25 mph is more than is reasonable or safe Narrow street not exceeding 25 feet other than a State Highway in a business or residential area or in a public park
Road near a school or senior center facility
22358.3 &
22358.4
25 mph State or
local authority
Any highway in any business or residential district
A street contiguous to senior citizen facility other than a State highway Adjacent to a children’s playground in a public park, but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use facilities 22352.b &
22357.1
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised February 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates
Part 2 – Signs
Revised February 6, 2023
cle Code
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 259
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Table 2B-102(CA). Standard Application of Speed Limits per California Vehicle Code Speed Determined by Roadway Facility CVC
Section
15 to 60 mph Caltrans State highway, based on an E&TS where ethe limit of 65 mph is more than reasonable or safe 22354
15 to 60 mph
Local city council
or county board
of supervisors for
Caltrans
State highway, local entities may conduct a public hearing on proposed increases or decreases and the State Department of Transportation shall take into consideration the results of the public hearing
22354.5
30 to 65 mph Local authority
Any street other than a State highway, by ordinance, may post a prima facie speed limit based on an E&TS where a speed > 25 mph would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe
22357
15 to 60 mph Local authority
Any street other than a State highway, by ordinance, may post a prima facie speed limit based on an E&TS where the limit of 65 mph is more than is reasonable and safe
22358.8(a)
20 to 50 mph for
Trucks
State or
local authority
Highways under their respective jurisdiction where 55 mph is more than is reasonable or safe for vehicles mentioned in CVC 22406 (Trucks and other large vehicles)
22407
Maximum Speed
55 mph
State or
local authority
Two-lane, undivided highway
Any highway if driving any of the following vehicles:
a. Motortruck or truck tractor with > 3 axles
b. Passenger vehicle or bus towing any other vehicle
c. School bus transporting any school pupil
d. A farm labor vehicle when transporting passengers
e. A vehicle transporting explosives
f. A trailer bus
22349.b & .c
and 22406
Maximum Speed
Limit of 65 mph
State or
local authority
Any highway, posted at 65 mph based upon an E&TS, for
vehicles not subject to CVC 22406
22349(a) &
22349
Maximum
Freeway Speed
Limit 70 mph
Caltrans
Freeways, after consultation with the California Highway Patrol, based upon an E&TS, or upon the basis of appropriate designs standards and projected traffic volumes in the case of newly constructed freeway segments, for vehicles not subject to CVC 22406
22356
November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 260
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Table 2B-103(CA). Examples showing applicability of rounding and additional speed reduction on State Highway System
85th-Percentile
Speed (mph)
Rounding to
nearest 5 mph
increment (CVC
22358.6(a))
If rounding to
nearest is up,
may round down
(CVC 22358.6(c))
If rounding to
nearest is down,
may additionally
lower by 5 mph
(CVC 22358.6(b))
47.5-50.0 50 45 N/A
45.1-47.4 45 N/A 40
42.5-45.0 45 40 N/A
40.1-42.4 40 N/A 35
Note – CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 & 22358.9 are applicable to local agency roadways and public properties subjected to CVC, they are not applicable to the State Highway System. Refer to Section 2B.13 for more details.
Table 2B-104(CA). Examples showing applicability of rounding and additional speed reduction on Local Agency’s Roadways & Private Property Subjected to CVC
85th-Percentile
Speed (mph)
Rounding to
nearest 5 mph
increment (CVC
22358.6(a))
If rounding to
nearest is up,
may round down
(CVC 22358.6(c))
If rounding to
nearest is down,
may additionally
lower by 5 mph
(CVC 22358.6(b))
If safety corridor or
adjacent to high
concentration of
bicyclists &
pedestrians, may
additionally lower by
5 mph (CVC 22358.7)*
47.5-50.0 50 45 N/A 40
45.1-47.4 45 N/A 40 35
42.5-45.0 45 40 N/A 35
40.1-42.4 40 N/A 35 30
* Note – CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 & 22358.9 are applicable to local agency roadways and private properties subjected to CVC, they are not applicable to the State Highway System. Refer to Section 2B.13 for more details.
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised February 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs
Table 2B-105(CA). Safety Corridor Factors
Category Factors
Crash Weighting Factors to
Develop One Serious/Fatal
Injury Safety Corridor
Crash severity: Fatal Crashes, Serious Injury Crashes Mode: Pedestrian-bicycle related crashes, vehicle/other Disadvantaged Community Status: MPO/RTPA or locally defined disadvantaged community status based on most current version of CalEnviroScreen
Vulnerable Populations: Seniors (age 65 and older) and Youth (under age 15) based on the American Community Survey
School proximity (within 0.25 miles) based on the California School Campus Database
Systemic or Predicted Crashes
Crash Density
Each roadway segment block may be converted into ~ 0.25 mile overlapping or contiguous “corridor” segments to create a consistent unit of measurement and assess the concentration of linear patterns of crashes within a defined distance. The highest scoring (i.e. most fatal and serious injury crashes per mile) “corridor” segments within a street needs to be identified and an appropriate threshold set to determine safety corridor eligibility.
Maintenance The jurisdiction may establish a review and re-evaluation frequency for safety corridors. However, such frequency need not exceed seven years.
November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 261
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised April 1, 2025 Part 2 – Signs
Category Generator
Employment centers
Presence of retail
Parks, multi-use trails, and recreational destinations
Land Use Schools/universities
Senior Centers
Cultural areas, entertainment space areas, or areas of community significance Religious facilities
Health/medical facilities
Transit Factors Transit stops
Transit Oriented Developments/Transit Priority Areas
Sidewalk presence
Presence of Crosswalk presence
Pedestrian/Bicyclist Bikeway presence
Infrastructure Nearby signalized intersections on four-way intersections Presence of micromobility devices such as bicycles or scooters Demographic Factors
Presence of vulnerable groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused MPO/RTPA or locally defined disadvantaged community status Presence of students (all levels)
Local Data Need identified in a safety analysis such as a road safety audit or formalized planning document such as a local road safety plan
November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 262
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Table 2B-106(CA). Requirements to determine Land or Facility that Generates High Concentrations of Bicyclists or Pedestrians
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised February 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs
APPENDIX C
Traffic Radar Certifications
Traffic Radar Equipment Certification
Traffic Radar Operator Certification
Created With Tiny Scanner Page 713 of 1101
Created With Tiny Scanner Page 714 of 1101
Created With Tiny Scanner Page 715 of 1101
APPENDIX D
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Reports
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, Raised Median w/ Landscaping 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,627 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.39 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.43 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 33 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 29 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 26 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 29 M.P.H.
39 X 1
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 M.P.H.
37 X X X 3
36 X 1 % IN PACE: 87%
35 X X 2
34 X X X X 4 * % OVER PACE: 7%
33 X X X X X X 6 *
32 X X X X X X 6 * % UNDER PACE: 6%
31 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
30 X X X X X X 6 A
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, OC Loop Trail 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 E NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
26 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
25 X X X X X X 6 *
24 X 1
23 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X X 3
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
30 ROADWAY: Arroyo Cajon Drive
2/5/2025
LIMITS: Kellogg Drive to Foxfield Lane
9:40 - 11:05 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
001 ArrKelFox.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction with combination yellow centerline, double yellow centerline, 61 0 painted island, on-street parking
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,669 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.35 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 38 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 31 M.P.H.
43 0
42 X 1 15TH %: 29 M.P.H.
41 X X 2
40 X X X 3 AVERAGE SPEED: 32 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X 8
38 X X 2 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 4
36 X X X X X X 6 * % IN PACE: 75%
35 X X X 3 *
34 X X X X X X X X 8 * % OVER PACE: 20%
33 X X X X X 5 P
32 X X X X X 5 A % UNDER PACE: 5%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 * ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, no left turn channelization, on-street parking 28 X X X 3 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X 5 *
26 X X 2
25 X 1
24 X 1
23 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
30 ROADWAY: Avenida Adobe
2/11/2025
LIMITS: Yorba Linda Boulevard to New River Road
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
10:30 - 11:50 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
002 AdoYorNew.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME : 2:55 - 3:50 65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, yellow centerline, yellow double-double island, 61 0 2 lane each direction with raised median w/ landscaping 60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, park
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,905 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.56 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.56 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 35 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 31 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 28 M.P.H.
41 X X 2
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 32 M.P.H.
39 X 1
38 X X 2 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 5 *
36 X X X X 4 * % IN PACE: 90%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P % OVER PACE: 5%
33 X X X X X X X X 8 A
32 X X X X X X X X 8 C % UNDER PACE: 5%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E
30 X X X X X 5 *
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 * ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, multiple driveways, no left turn channelization, on-street parking 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X 2
26 X X 2
25 0
24 X 1
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
30 ROADWAY: Avenida Rio del Oro
2/11/2025
LIMITS: Avenida del Norte to Yorba Linda Boulevard
TRAFFIC No. 2838
003 RioAveYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction with combination undivided and double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 998 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.37 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 32 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 28 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 24 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 28 M.P.H.
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 M.P.H.
37 X 1
36 X X X 3 % IN PACE: 80%
35 X X 2
34 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 8%
33 X X X X X 5 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % UNDER PACE: 12%
31 X X X X X 5 *
30 X X X X X X X 7 P
29 X X X X X X X 7 A ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, no left turn channelization, on-street parking 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X 8 E
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
25 X X X X X X 6 *
24 X X X X X X X 7 *
23 X X X X X 5 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X 2
21 X X X 3 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 X 1
19 X 1 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
25 ROADWAY: Avocado Avenue
2/4/2025
LIMITS: Avocado Avenue to Oriente Drive
9:55 - 11:15 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
004 AvoAvoOri.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction with combination undivided and double yellow centerline 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, church
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,149 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.41 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 31 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 28 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 25 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 28 M.P.H.
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 M.P.H.
37 0
36 X 1 % IN PACE: 91%
35 X 1
34 X X X X X 5 * % OVER PACE: 2%
33 X X X 3 *
32 X X X X 4 * % UNDER PACE: 7%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
30 X X X X X X X 7 A
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, no left turn channelization, rolled curbs 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 E NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
25 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
24 X X 2
23 X X X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 X X 2 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
30 ROADWAY: Avocado Avenue
2/4/2025
LIMITS: Oriente Drive to Yorba Linda Boulevard
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9:00 - 9:55 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
005 AvoOriYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector, Minor Arterial 63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left turn center lane, bike lanes 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, school, church, medical office 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 17,255 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.11 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 39 M.P.H.
45 0
44 X 1 50TH %: 35 M.P.H.
43 X X 2
42 X X X X 4 15TH %: 32 M.P.H.
41 X X X X 4
40 X X X X 4 * AVERAGE SPEED: 36 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
36 X X X X X 5 A % IN PACE: 83%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
34 X X X X X X 6 E % OVER PACE: 11%
33 X X X X X X X X 8 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % UNDER PACE: 6%
31 X X X X X X X X 8 *
30 X X X 3
29 X X X 3 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, El Cajon Trail, bike lanes 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
40 ROADWAY: Bastanchury Road
1/14/2025
LIMITS: Western City Limit to Prospect Avenue
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
11:35 - 12:05 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
006 BasWclPro.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left turn center lane, double-double yellow island, 61 0 double yellow centerline, buffered bike lanes, on-street parking 60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, church
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 15,409 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.36 miles 53 X X 2
52 X 1
51 X X 2 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 X X X 3 *
49 X X X X X X X X 8 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0.33 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
47 X X X X X X X X 8 P
46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A 85TH %: 49 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X 5 C
44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E 50TH %: 44 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
42 X X X X X X 6 * 15TH %: 39 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X 7 *
40 X X X 3 AVERAGE SPEED: 44 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 5
38 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 4
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 75%
35 X X 2
34 X 1 % OVER PACE: 5%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 20%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, bike lanes, on-street parking 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
40 ROADWAY: Bastanchury Road
1/14/2025
LIMITS: Prospect Avenue to Imperial Hwy
11:15 - 11:35 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
007 BasProImp.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left turn center lane, raised median w/ landscaping, 61 0 double yellow centerline, double-double yellow island, bike lanes 60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, church
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 15,282 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.66 miles 53 0
52 X 1
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 X X X 3
49 X X X 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.09 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 X X X X 4
47 X X X X X X X 7 *
46 X X X X X X 6 * 85TH %: 47 M.P.H.
45 X X X X 4 *
44 X X X X 4 P 50TH %: 41 M.P.H.
43 X X X 3 A
42 X X X X X X X X 8 C 15TH %: 37 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * AVERAGE SPEED: 41 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
38 X X X X X X X 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 38 - 47 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 4
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 71%
35 X X X X X X 6
34 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 11%
33 X X 2
32 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 18%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, bike lanes 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
40 ROADWAY: Bastanchury Road
1/14/2025
LIMITS: Imperial Hwy to Eureka Avenue
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
12:05 - 12:25 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
008 BasImpEur.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME : 12:25 - 12:45 65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left turn center lane, double yellow centerline, 61 0 double-double yellow island, raised median w/ landscaping, bike lanes 60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, church
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 X 1 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 15,744 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.49 miles 53 X X 2
52 X 1
51 X X 2 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 X X 2
49 X X X 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.24 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
47 X X X 3 *
46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * 85TH %: 48 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X 8 P
44 X X X X X X X X 8 A 50TH %: 43 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C
42 X X X X X X X 7 E 15TH %: 40 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
40 X X X X X X X X 8 * AVERAGE SPEED: 44 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 M.P.H.
37 X X X 3
36 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 82%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 11%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 7%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Bike lanes, Equastrian trail, school zone 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
40 ROADWAY: Bastanchury Road
1/14/2025
LIMITS: Eureka Avenue to Lakeview Avenue
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
009 BasEurLak.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, raised median w/ landscaping, 61 0 double-double yellow island, bike lanes
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, golf course
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 17,738 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.79 miles 53 0
52 X X 2
51 X X 2 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 3 midblock collisions 50 X X X X X 5
49 X X X X 4 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.19 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X 1
47 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * 85TH %: 47 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
44 X X X X X 5 P 50TH %: 43 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A
42 X X X 3 C 15TH %: 39 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
40 X X X X X X X X 8 * AVERAGE SPEED: 43 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 X X X 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 38 - 47 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 4
36 X X X 3 % IN PACE: 77%
35 X 1
34 0 % OVER PACE: 14%
33 X 1
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 9%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Bike lanes, Equastrian trail 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
45 ROADWAY: Bastanchury Road
1/14/2025
LIMITS: Lakeview Avenue and Clydesdale
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
12:45 - 1:05 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
010 BasLakCly.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, raised median w/ landscaping, 61 0 double-double yellow island, bike lanes
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, school
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 X X 2
54 X 1 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 15,585 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.76 miles 53 X X X 3
52 0
51 X X X 3 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 X X X X 4 *
49 X X X 3 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0.08 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
47 X X X X X X X 7 P
46 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A 85TH %: 49 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X 7 C
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 E 50TH %: 45 M.P.H. 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * 15TH %: 42 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X 5 *
40 X X X X 4 AVERAGE SPEED: 45 M.P.H.
39 X 1
38 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 M.P.H.
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 85%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 9%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 6%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Bike lanes, Equastrian trail, school zone 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
45 ROADWAY: Bastanchury Road
3/4/2025
LIMITS: Clydesdale to Fairmont Boulevard
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
12:30 - 12:50 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
011 BasClyFai.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, raised median w/ landscaping, 61 0 double-double yellow island, bike lanes
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, park
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 10,840 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.52 miles 53 0
52 X 1
51 X X 2 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 X X 2
49 X X 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.32 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.61 acc/mvm 48 X X X 3
47 X X X X X 5
46 X X X X X 5 * 85TH %: 46 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
44 X X X X X X X X 8 * 50TH %: 42 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A 15TH %: 38 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
40 X X X X X X 6 E AVERAGE SPEED: 42 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 X X X X X X X 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X 6 *
36 X X X X X 5 % IN PACE: 77%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 15%
33 X X 2
32 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 8%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Bike lanes, Equastrian trail, school zone 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
45 ROADWAY: Bastanchury Road
1/14/2025
LIMITS: Fairmont Boulevard to Village Center Drive
1:05 - 1:25 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
012 BasFaiVill.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction with double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, park
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,901 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.71 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.67 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 37 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 32 M.P.H.
43 X X 2
42 0 15TH %: 28 M.P.H.
41 0
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 32 M.P.H.
39 X 1
38 X X X X X X X 7 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X 8 *
36 X X X X X X X 7 * % IN PACE: 75%
35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 X X X X X X X 7 P % OVER PACE: 11%
33 X X X X X X 6 A
32 X X X X X X X X 8 C % UNDER PACE: 14%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
29 X X 2 * ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, on-street parking, railroad track adjacent 28 X X X X X X X X 8 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X 8
26 X 1
25 X X X 3
24 0
23 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
35 ROADWAY: Brush Canyon Drive
2/18/2025
LIMITS: Camino De Bryant to Running Springs Way
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
10:45 - 11:55 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
013 BruCamRun.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, undivided, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 684 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.36 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 34 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 29 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 26 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 30 M.P.H.
39 X 1
38 X X 2 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 M.P.H.
37 X X X 3
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 77%
35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 X X X X X X X 7 * % OVER PACE: 8%
33 X X X X X 5 *
32 X X X X X 5 P % UNDER PACE: 15%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
30 X X X 3 C
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, on-street parking 28 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
26 X X X X X X X 7 *
25 X X X X 4
24 X X X X 4
23 X X X X X 5 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X 1
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 X 1
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
30 ROADWAY: Brush Canyon Drive
2/18/2025
LIMITS: Running Springs Way to End
11:55 AM - 1:45 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
014 BruRunEnd.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, two-way left turn center lane 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6,971 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.31 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 3 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.28 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 X 1 85TH %: 41 M.P.H.
45 X X 2
44 X X X 3 50TH %: 38 M.P.H.
43 X X 2
42 X X X X X X 6 * 15TH %: 34 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X 5 *
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * AVERAGE SPEED: 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X 8 P
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 A 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
36 X X X X X X X 7 E % IN PACE: 85%
35 X X X X X 5 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % OVER PACE: 8%
33 X X X X X X X X 8 *
32 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 7%
31 X X X 3
30 X X 2
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve 28 X 1 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
40 ROADWAY: Buena Vista Avenue
2/4/2025
LIMITS: Van Buren Street to Richfield Road
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3:25 - 3:45 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
015 BueVanRic.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, two-way left turn center lane, striped shoulder, 61 0 on-street parking
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7,655 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.58 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 X 1
49 X X X X X X 6 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.41 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 X X X X X X X 7 *
46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * 85TH %: 46 M.P.H.
45 X X X X 4 *
44 X X 2 P 50TH %: 41 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 C 15TH %: 38 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
40 X X X X X X X X 8 * AVERAGE SPEED: 42 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 X X X X X X X 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 38 - 47 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 4
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 78%
35 X X 2
34 X X X X X 5 % OVER PACE: 7%
33 0
32 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 15%
31 X 1
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple Driveways, on-street parking, wide striped shoulders, equastrian trail, 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0 horse crossing
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
40 ROADWAY: Buena Vista Avenue
2/5/2025
LIMITS: Richfield Road to Lakeview Avenue
11:05 - 11:30 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
016 BueRicLak.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,688 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.39 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 35 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 30 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 27 M.P.H.
41 0
40 X X X 3 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 M.P.H.
39 X X 2
38 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 M.P.H.
37 X X 2
36 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 80%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 *
34 X X X 3 * % OVER PACE: 12%
33 X X X X X X 6 *
32 X X X X X X X X X 9 P % UNDER PACE: 8%
31 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple Driveways, on-street parking, rolled curbs, equastrian trail 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X 3 *
26 X X X X X 5 *
25 X X X X X 5
24 X 1
23 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X 1
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
35 ROADWAY: Buena Vista Avenue
2/5/2025
LIMITS: Lakeview Avenue to Scenic View Drive
11:30 AM - 12:40 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
017 BueLakSce.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, equestrian facility, church 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,564 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.32 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 36 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 33 M.P.H.
43 0
42 X 1 15TH %: 28 M.P.H.
41 X X 2
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 32 M.P.H.
39 X X X 3
38 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 M.P.H.
37 X X X 3
36 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % IN PACE: 79%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * % OVER PACE: 12%
33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
32 X X X X X X X X 8 A % UNDER PACE: 9%
31 X X X X X X 6 C
30 X X X X X 5 E
29 X X X X X X X 7 * ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple Driveways, curbless segments, equastrian trail , horse crossing, 28 X X X X X X X 7 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X 5 * OC Loop El Cajon Trail, school zone
26 X X X X X X 6
25 X X 2
24 X 1
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
35 ROADWAY: Buena Vista Avenue
2/5/2025
LIMITS: Scenic View Drive to Grandview Avenue
12:40 - 1:50 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
018 BueSceGra.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow island, raised median 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residentia, park
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 4,677 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.60 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 9 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 2.94 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 38 M.P.H.
45 0
44 X 1 50TH %: 35 M.P.H.
43 0
42 X X X 3 15TH %: 29 M.P.H.
41 X 1
40 X X X X X 5 * AVERAGE SPEED: 34 M.P.H.
39 X X X X 4 *
38 X X X X X X X 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 P
36 X X X X X X X 7 A % IN PACE: 73%
35 X X X X X X X 7 C
34 X X X X X X X X 8 E % OVER PACE: 5%
33 X X X X X 5 *
32 X X X X X X X X 8 * % UNDER PACE: 22%
31 X X X X X X 6 *
30 X X X X X 5
29 X X X X 4 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, no left turn channelization, railroad overpass, 28 X X X 3 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X 4 bike shared lane markings, high accident rate 26 X 1
25 X X 2
24 X X 2
23 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
30 ROADWAY: Camino de Bryant
2/18/2025
LIMITS: Paseo de Toronto to La Palma Avenue
9:50 - 10:45 AM
Y
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
019 CamPasLap.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction with double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,164 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.23 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 33 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 27 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 24 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 28 M.P.H.
39 0
38 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 M.P.H.
37 X X 2
36 X X X X X 5 % IN PACE: 76%
35 X X X 3
34 X 1 % OVER PACE: 12%
33 X X X X X X X X 8 *
32 X X 2 * % UNDER PACE: 12%
31 X X X X X X X X 8 *
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
29 X X X X X 5 A ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple Driveways, on-street parking, no left turn channelization, rolled curbs 28 X X X X X 5 C NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 E
26 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
25 X X X X X X X 7 *
24 X X X X X X X 7 *
23 X X X X X X 6 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X X 3
21 X X 2 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 X 1
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
12:20 - 1:50 PM
30 ROADWAY: Casa Loma Avenue
2/4/2025
LIMITS: Bastanchury Road to Imperial Highway
TRAFFIC No. 2838
020 CasBasImp.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction with double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, Community Center, park, school, city government office,city hall 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,016 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.53 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 39 M.P.H.
45 X 1
44 0 50TH %: 34 M.P.H.
43 X X X 3
42 X X X 3 15TH %: 28 M.P.H.
41 X X X 3
40 X X X X 4 AVERAGE SPEED: 33 M.P.H.
39 X X X 3
38 X X X X X X X 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 4 *
36 X X X X 4 * % IN PACE: 66%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 P
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A % OVER PACE: 17%
33 X X X X X 5 C
32 X X X X 4 E % UNDER PACE: 17%
31 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
30 X X X X X X X X 8 *
29 X X X X X 5 * ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple Driveways, on-street parking, El Cajon Trail, uncontrolled crosswalk, 28 X X X X X 5 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X 5 no left turn channelization, school zone, uncontrolled school crossing 26 X 1
25 X X 2
24 X X 2
23 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X 1
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
30 ROADWAY: Casa Loma Avenue
2/4/2025
LIMITS: Imperial Highway to Yorba Linda Boulevard
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1:50 - 2:55 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
021 CasImpYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, undivided, raised median 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,724 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.31 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 37 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 32 M.P.H.
43 0
42 X 1 15TH %: 27 M.P.H.
41 X 1
40 X X X X 4 AVERAGE SPEED: 32 M.P.H.
39 X X X 3
38 X X X X X X 6 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 4
36 X X X X X X 6 * % IN PACE: 68%
35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % OVER PACE: 19%
33 X X X X X X 6 P
32 X X X X X X X X 8 A % UNDER PACE: 13%
31 X X X X X X 6 C
30 X X X X X X X X 8 E
29 X X X X 4 * ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, trails 28 X X X X X X X X X 9 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X 6 *
26 X X X X 4
25 X X X 3
24 X X X 3
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X X 3
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
ESTABLISH
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3:10 - 3:55 PM
30 ROADWAY: Clydesdale Drive
1/22/2025
LIMITS: Brenton Lane to Bastanchury Road
TRAFFIC No. 2838
022 ClyBreBas.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction with double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, school, park
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,419 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.75 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 36 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 30 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 25 M.P.H.
41 X 1
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 30 M.P.H.
39 X X 2
38 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 5
36 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 68%
35 X 1
34 X X X X X X X X 8 * % OVER PACE: 17%
33 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
32 X X X X X X X X 8 * % UNDER PACE: 15%
31 X X X X X X 6 P
30 X X X X X X 6 A
29 X X X X X X X X X 9 C ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple Driveways, horizontal curvature, vertical curve, on-street parking, 28 X X X X X X X 7 E NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X 4 * no left turn channelization, school zone, school crossing, Domiguez Ranch Trail 26 X X X X X X X X 8 *
25 X X X 3 *
24 X X X X X 5
23 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X X 3
21 X X X X 4 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 X 1
19 X 1 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
25 ROADWAY: Dominguez Ranch Road
2/11/2025
LIMITS: Yorba Ranch Road to Trailside Drive
11:50 AM - 1:15 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
023 DomYorTra.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, yellow centerline, double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, park
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,297 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.45 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 3.16 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 36 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 31 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 26 M.P.H.
41 X 1
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 M.P.H.
39 X X 2
38 X X 2 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X 6 *
36 X X X X X 5 * % IN PACE: 76%
35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 X X X X X X X X 8 P % OVER PACE: 5%
33 X X X X X X 6 A
32 X X X X X X X X X 9 C % UNDER PACE: 19%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
30 X X X X X X X 7 *
29 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, on-street parking, no left turn channelization, 28 X X X X X 5 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X 2 uncontrolled crossing, trail
26 X X X 3
25 X X X X X X X X X 9
24 X X 2
23 X X X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
35 ROADWAY: Dominguez Ranch Road
2/11/2025
LIMITS: Trailside Drive to Esperanza Road
1:15 - 2:55 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
024 DomTraEsp.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double-double yellow island, raised median w/ landscaping, 61 0 bike path (class I), bike lanes, striped shoulder
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, church, railroad
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 X 1
56 X X X 3 WEATHER: Clear
55 X 1
54 X X X X X X 6 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 14,782 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.75 miles 53 X X X X 4
52 X X X X X 5
51 X X X X 4 * ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 0 *
49 X X X X X X X 7 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0.16 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
47 X X X X X X X 7 A
46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C 85TH %: 52 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * 50TH %: 46 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 X X X X X X 6 * 15TH %: 43 M.P.H.
41 X X 2
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 47 M.P.H.
39 0
38 X X X X 4 10 MPH PACE: 42 - 51 M.P.H.
37 X 1
36 0 % IN PACE: 72%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 20%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 8%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, bike path (class I), bike lanes, trail, railroad adjacent to segment, 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0 historical marker
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 50 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
50 ROADWAY: Esperanza Road
2/11/2025
LIMITS: Fairlyn Boulevard to Fairmont Boulevard
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9:00 - 9:20 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
025 EspFaiFai.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left turn center lane, double-double yellow island, bike lanes 61 0
60 X 1 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, railroad
59 X X 2
58 X X X X X X X 7 * ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 X X X X 4 *
56 X X X 3 * WEATHER: Clear
55 X X X X X X X 7 P
54 X X X X X X X 7 A AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 10,701 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.56 miles 53 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
51 X X X X X X X 7 * ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
49 X X X X X X X 7 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0.15 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X 5
47 X X X 3
46 X X X X 4 85TH %: 56 M.P.H.
45 X X 2
44 0 50TH %: 52 M.P.H.
43 X 1
42 X X 2 15TH %: 48 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 52 M.P.H.
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 49 - 58 M.P.H.
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 80%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 3%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 17%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, bike lanes, trail, railroad adjacent to segment 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 50 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
50 ROADWAY: Esperanza Road
2/11/2025
LIMITS: Fairmont Boulevard to Paseo del Prado
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9:20 - 9:40 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
026 EspFaiPas.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left turn center lane, double-double yellow island, bike lanes 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, railroad
59 X X X X 4
58 X X X X X X 6 * ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 X X X X X X X X 8 *
56 X X X X X X X 7 * WEATHER: Clear
55 X X X X 4 P
54 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,960 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.59 miles 53 X X X X X X X X 8 C
52 X X X 3 E
51 X X X X X X X X 8 * ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 X X X X X X X X 8 *
49 X X X X X X X X X 9 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0.26 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X 6
47 X X X X X X X 7
46 X X X X 4 85TH %: 57 M.P.H.
45 X 1
44 X X 2 50TH %: 52 M.P.H.
43 X X 2
42 X X 2 15TH %: 47 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 52 M.P.H.
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 49 - 58 M.P.H.
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 72%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 4%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 24%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, bike lanes, trail, railroad adjacent to segment 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 50 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
50 ROADWAY: Esperanza Road
2/11/2025
LIMITS: Paseo del Prado to Dominguez Ranch Road
9:40 - 10:00 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
027 EspPasDom.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial, Local
63 0
62 X 1 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, two-way left turn center lane, double-double yellow island, 61 X 1 raised median, bike lanes
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, commercial, railroad 59 X X X X X 5
58 X X X X X 5 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 X X X 3
56 X X X X 4 * WEATHER: Clear
55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 X X X X X X X X 8 * AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6,708 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.71 miles 53 X X X X X X X X 8 P
52 X X X X X X X X 8 A
51 X X X X X X X X 8 C ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
49 X X X X X 5 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
47 X X X X 4 *
46 X X X X 4 85TH %: 56 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X 5
44 X X X 3 50TH %: 51 M.P.H.
43 X 1
42 X 1 15TH %: 47 M.P.H.
41 0
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 51 M.P.H.
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 47 - 56 M.P.H.
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 70%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 15%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 15%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve,bike lanes, trail, railroad adjacent to segment 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 50 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
50 ROADWAY: Esperanza Road
2/11/2025
LIMITS: Dominguez Ranch Road to New River Road
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
10:00 - 10:30 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
028 EspDomNew.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, mosque, school
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,802 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.40 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 3 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 3.77 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 35 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 31 M.P.H.
43 0
42 X 1 15TH %: 27 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 M.P.H.
39 X X 2
38 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 M.P.H.
37 X 1
36 X X X 3 % IN PACE: 81%
35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 X X X X X X X X 8 * % OVER PACE: 10%
33 X X X X X X X 7 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P % UNDER PACE: 9%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A
30 X X X X X X X 7 C
29 X X X X X X X X 8 E ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, no left turn channelization, on-street parking, 28 X X X X X X 6 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X 7 * rolled curb segments, curbless segments 26 X X X X X X 6 *
25 X X 2
24 X X X 3
23 X X X X 4 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
30 ROADWAY: Eureka Avenue
2/4/2025
LIMITS: Bastanchury Road to Imperial Highway
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
11:15 AM - 12:20 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
029 EurBasImp.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction with double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, commercial, post office, library, museum 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 4,076 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.35 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.27 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 34 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 29 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 25 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 29 M.P.H.
39 X X 2
38 X X 2 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 M.P.H.
37 0
36 X 1 % IN PACE: 77%
35 X X X X X 5
34 X X X X X X 6 * % OVER PACE: 10%
33 X X X X X 5 *
32 X X X X X X X 7 * % UNDER PACE: 13%
31 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
29 X X X X X X X X X 9 C ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, no left turn channelization, on-street parking, uncontrolled crossing, 28 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X 6 * El Cajon trail
26 X X X X X X 6 *
25 X X X X X X X 7 *
24 X X X X X 5
23 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X X 3
21 X X X 3 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 X 1
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
30 ROADWAY: Eureka Avenue
2/4/2025
LIMITS: Imperial Highway to Yorba Linda Boulevard
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
2:55 - 3:25 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
030 EurImpYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, yellow centerline, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow island, 61 0 on-street parking
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,200 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.88 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 34 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 31 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 26 M.P.H.
41 X 1
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 30 M.P.H.
39 X 1
38 X X 2 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 M.P.H.
37 X X X 3
36 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 78%
35 X X X X 4 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % OVER PACE: 11%
33 X X X X 4 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P % UNDER PACE: 11%
31 X X X X X X X 7 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, horizontal curvature, vertical curve, no left turn channelization, 28 X X X X 4 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X 3 * on-street parking, uncontrolled horse crossing 26 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
25 X X X 3
24 X X 2
23 X X X X 4 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X 1
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 X 1 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
30 ROADWAY: Fairmont Boulevard
1/14/2025
LIMITS: San Antonio Road to Village Center Drive
1:25 - 2:50 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
031 FaiSanVil.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow island, bike lanes 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,364 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.29 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 0
47 X 1
46 X X X X X X X 7 85TH %: 42 M.P.H.
45 X X X X 4
44 0 50TH %: 35 M.P.H.
43 X X X 3
42 X X X 3 15TH %: 30 M.P.H.
41 X X 2
40 X X X 3 AVERAGE SPEED: 36 M.P.H.
39 X X 2
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X 5 *
36 X X X 3 * % IN PACE: 66%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A % OVER PACE: 25%
33 X X X X X X 6 C
32 X X X X X X X 7 E % UNDER PACE: 9%
31 X X X X X X X 7 *
30 X X X 3 *
29 X X X X 4 * ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, bike lanes, trail 28 X X X X X 5 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X 2
26 0
25 X X 2
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
35 ROADWAY: Fairmont Boulevard
1/14/2025
LIMITS: Village Center Drive to Rimcrest Drive
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
2:50 - 3:30 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
032 FaiVilRim.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow island, 61 0 two-way left turn center lane, raised median w/ landscaping, bike lanes 60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 X 1
56 X X X 3 WEATHER: Clear
55 X 1
54 X 1 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,961 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.76 miles 53 X X X X X 5
52 X X X X 4
51 X X X 3 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 X X X X 4 *
49 X X X X X X X 7 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0.40 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
47 X X X X X X X X 8 P
46 X X X X X 5 A 85TH %: 51 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X 6 C
44 X X X X X X X X 8 E 50TH %: 46 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 X X X 3 * 15TH %: 39 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X 6 *
40 X X X X 4 AVERAGE SPEED: 45 M.P.H.
39 X X 2
38 X X X X 4 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 M.P.H.
37 X X 2
36 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 62%
35 X X 2
34 X 1 % OVER PACE: 18%
33 0
32 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 20%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, bike lanes, trail 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
45 ROADWAY: Fairmont Boulevard
1/14/2025
LIMITS: Rimcrest Drive to Bastanchury Road
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3:30 - 4:00 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
033 FaiRimBas.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, raised median, double-double yellow island, two-way left turn center lane, 61 0 bike lanes , on-street parking
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, school, park, shopping center, church 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7,876 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.87 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 4 midblock collisions 50 0
49 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.53 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 X 1
47 X X X 3
46 X X X 3 * 85TH %: 45 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X 8 *
44 X X X X X X X 7 * 50TH %: 41 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A 15TH %: 38 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
40 X X X X X X X X 8 E AVERAGE SPEED: 41 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X 5 *
36 X 1 % IN PACE: 87%
35 X X X X 4
34 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 5%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 8%
31 X 1
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, bike lanes, on-street parking, trail, school zone 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
40 ROADWAY: Fairmont Boulevard
1/15/2025
LIMITS: Bastanchury Road to Yorba Linda Boulevard
9:00 - 9:20 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
034 FaiBasYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow island, 61 0 two-way left turn center lane, bike lanes
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, schools, shopping center, church 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 8,839 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.75 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 X X 2
47 0
46 X X 2 85TH %: 43 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X 6
44 X X X X 4 * 50TH %: 40 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 X X X X X X X X 8 * 15TH %: 36 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A AVERAGE SPEED: 40 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
38 X X X X X X X X X 9 E 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X 7 *
36 X X X X X X 6 * % IN PACE: 83%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 *
34 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 10%
33 X 1
32 X X X 3 % UNDER PACE: 7%
31 X 1
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, horizontal curvature, vertical curve, bike lanes, Bernardo trail, 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0 school zone
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9:20 - 9:40 AM
40 ROADWAY: Fairmont Boulevard
1/15/2025
LIMITS: Yorba Linda Boulevard to Paseo de las Palomas
TRAFFIC No. 2838
035 FaiYorPas.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, raised median w/ landscape, bike lanes 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7,182 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.66 miles 53 X 1
52 X X X X 4
51 X X X X X X 6 * ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 X X X X X X 6 *
49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0.19 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
46 X X X X X X X X X 9 C 85TH %: 50 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 E
44 X X X X X X X 7 * 50TH %: 47 M.P.H.
43 X X X 3 *
42 X X X X X X 6 * 15TH %: 43 M.P.H.
41 X X X 3
40 X X X X 4 AVERAGE SPEED: 46 M.P.H.
39 X 1
38 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 42 - 51 M.P.H.
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 86%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 5%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 9%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, bike lanes, bike/horse trail 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
40 ROADWAY: Fairmont Boulevard
1/15/2025
LIMITS: Paseo de las Palomas to Village Center Drive
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9:40 - 10:00 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
036 FaiPasVill.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 3 lanes each direction, raised median w/ landscape, bike lanes 61 0 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow island 60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, school, church
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 12,902 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.42 miles 53 0
52 X 1
51 X X 2 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 X X 2
49 X X 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.34 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X 6 *
47 X X X X X 5 *
46 X X X X X X X X 8 * 85TH %: 47 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X 8 P
44 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A 50TH %: 43 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E 15TH %: 39 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X 8 *
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * AVERAGE SPEED: 43 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X 7 *
38 X X X X 4 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 5
36 0 % IN PACE: 81%
35 X 1
34 X 1 % OVER PACE: 7%
33 0
32 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 12%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, bike lanes, bike/horse trail 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
40 ROADWAY: Fairmont Boulevard
1/15/2025
LIMITS: Village Center Drive to South City Limit
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
10:00 - 10:20 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
037 FaiVilSCL.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow island, bike lanes (class I), 61 0 on-street parking
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, school, church
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 4,320 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.17 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 35 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 32 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 29 M.P.H.
41 X X 2
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 32 M.P.H.
39 X 1
38 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 M.P.H.
37 X X 2
36 X X X X X X X 7 * % IN PACE: 89%
35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % OVER PACE: 8%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 A % UNDER PACE: 3% 31 X X X X X X X X 8 C
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
29 X X X X X X 6 * ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, bike lanes (class I), on-street parking 28 X X X X X X 6 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X 5 *
26 X 1
25 X 1
24 X 1
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
35 ROADWAY: Fairmont Connector
1/30/2025
LIMITS: Esperanza Road to Fairmont Boulevard
2:10 - 2:35 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
038 FaiEspFai.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow island, raised median, 61 0 two-way left turn center lane, bike lanes, on-street parking 60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, shopping center, church 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,758 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.27 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 X X X 3
46 0 85TH %: 42 M.P.H.
45 X X X 3
44 X X X X 4 * 50TH %: 39 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X 5 *
42 X X X X X X X X 8 * 15TH %: 35 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
40 X X X X X X X 7 A AVERAGE SPEED: 39 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X 8 *
36 X X X X X X X 7 * % IN PACE: 82%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
34 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 6%
33 X X 2
32 X X X X 4 % UNDER PACE: 12%
31 X X 2
30 X 1
29 X 1 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, bike lanes, on-street parking 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3:20 - 3:45 PM
35 ROADWAY: Golden Avenue
1/23/2025
LIMITS: Western City Limit to Rose Drive
TRAFFIC No. 2838
039 GolWCLRos.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow island 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Park, RV Park, Vacant
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 X X X 3 WEATHER: Clear
55 X X X X X 5
54 X 1 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 12,991 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.58 miles 53 0
52 X X X X X X 6
51 X X X X 4 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 X 1
49 X X X X 4 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0.24 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X X 8 *
47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
46 X X X X X X X X X 9 P 85TH %: 51 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
44 X X X X X X X X X 9 C 50TH %: 46 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X 7 E
42 X X X X X X X 7 * 15TH %: 41 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X 8 *
40 X X X X 4 * AVERAGE SPEED: 46 M.P.H.
39 X X X 3
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 40 - 49 M.P.H.
37 X 1
36 0 % IN PACE: 76%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 20%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 4%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Santa Ana River Trail
28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
45 ROADWAY: Gypsum Canyon Road
1/29/2025
LIMITS: La Palma Avenue to South City Limit/SR-91
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9:00 - 9:35 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
040 GypLapSCL.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, raised median w/ landscape, bike lanes 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,296 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.44 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 6 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 5.41 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 X 1
46 0 85TH %: 40 M.P.H.
45 X X X 3
44 0 50TH %: 34 M.P.H.
43 X X 2
42 X X X X X 5 15TH %: 29 M.P.H.
41 X X X 3
40 X X 2 AVERAGE SPEED: 34 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X 7 *
38 X X X X X X X 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 4 *
36 X X X X X X X 7 P % IN PACE: 65%
35 X X X X X X 6 A
34 X X X X X X X 7 C % OVER PACE: 16%
33 X X X X X X X X 8 E
32 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % UNDER PACE: 19%
31 X X X X X 5 *
30 X X X X X 5 *
29 X X X X X X X 7 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Bike lanes, trail, railroad tracks adjacent to segment 28 X X X X 4 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X 4
26 X X 2
25 X 1
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X 1
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1:10 - 2:00 PM
35 ROADWAY: Hidden Hills Road
1/28/2025
LIMITS: Esperanza Road to Mission Hills Lane
TRAFFIC No. 2838
041 HidEspMis.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction with double yellow centerline 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,101 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.57 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 3 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 4.38 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 32 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 28 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 25 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 28 M.P.H.
39 X X 2
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 M.P.H.
37 0
36 X 1 % IN PACE: 85%
35 X 1
34 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 8%
33 X X X X 4 *
32 X X X X X X X 7 * % UNDER PACE: 7%
31 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
30 X X X X X X X 7 P
29 X X X X X X X X X 9 A ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, vertical curb, rolled curb segments, curbless segments 28 X X X X X X X X 8 C NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
26 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
25 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
24 X X X X X X X X 8 *
23 X X X X 4 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X 1
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 X X 2 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
25 ROADWAY: Highland Avenue
1/30/2025
LIMITS: Buena Vista Avenue to Mariposa Avenue
10:55 AM - 12:35 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
042 HigBueMar.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Principal Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 3 lanes each direction, two-way left turn center lane, raised median w/ landscaping 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, commercial, church, school 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 X X X X 4 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 39,698 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.62 miles 53 X X X 3
52 X X 2
51 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 8 midblock collisions 50 X X X X 4 *
49 X X X X X X 6 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0.30 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.87 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
47 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A 85TH %: 49 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X 6 C
44 X X X X X X X X X 9 E 50TH %: 45 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 *
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * 15TH %: 42 M.P.H.
41 X X X X 4 *
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 46 M.P.H.
39 X X 2
38 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 41 - 50 M.P.H.
37 X X 2
36 0 % IN PACE: 84%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 10%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 6%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, school zone 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 50 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
50 ROADWAY: Imperial Highway
1/23/2025
LIMITS: Northern City Limit to Bastanchury Road
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9:00 - 9:20 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
043 ImpNCLBas.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Principal Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 3 lanes each direction, two-way left turn center lane, raised median w/ landscaping 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, commercial, community center 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 X X 2
56 X X X 3 WEATHER: Clear
55 X X 2
54 X X X X X X 6 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 35,583 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.77 miles 53 X X X 3
52 X X X X 4 *
51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
49 X X X 3 P ACCIDENT RATE: 0.07 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.87 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
47 X X X X X X X X 8 C
46 X X X X X X X 7 E 85TH %: 53 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 X X X X X X X X 8 * 50TH %: 48 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X 5 *
42 X X X X 4 15TH %: 44 M.P.H.
41 0
40 X X X X 4 AVERAGE SPEED: 48 M.P.H.
39 X X 2
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 43 - 52 M.P.H.
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 74%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 16%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 10%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, horizontal curvature, El Cajon trail 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 50 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
50 ROADWAY: Imperial Highway
1/21/2025
LIMITS: Bastanchury Road to Eureka Avenue
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
2:30 - 2:50 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
044 ImpBasEur.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Principal Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 3 lanes each direction, raised median w/ landscaping 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, commercial, school, post office, restaurants 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 32,987 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.38 miles 53 0
52 X 1
51 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 X X X 3
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.15 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.87 acc/mvm 48 X 1
47 X X X X X X X X 8 *
46 X X X X X 5 * 85TH %: 46 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
44 X X X X X X X X 8 P 50TH %: 43 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C 15TH %: 38 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
40 X X X X X 5 * AVERAGE SPEED: 43 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 5 *
38 X X X X X X X X 8 * 10 MPH PACE: 38 - 47 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X 8
36 X 1 % IN PACE: 85%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 6%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 9%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, horizontal curvature 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
45 ROADWAY: Imperial Highway
1/21/2025
LIMITS: Eureka Avenue to Olinda Avenue
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
2:10 - 2:30 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
045 ImpEurOli.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Principal Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 3 lanes each direction, raised median w/ landscaping 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Commercial, restaurants, park
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 34,209 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.15 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 0
49 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.18 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 48 X X 2
47 X X X X 4
46 X X X 3 85TH %: 44 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X 5 *
44 X X X X X 5 * 50TH %: 40 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 X X X X X X X X 8 P 15TH %: 37 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X 7 A
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C AVERAGE SPEED: 41 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 *
36 X X X X X X 6 * % IN PACE: 89%
35 X 1
34 0 % OVER PACE: 10%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 1%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, verticval curve 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
40 ROADWAY: Imperial Highway
1/21/2025
LIMITS: Olinda Avenue to Yorba Linda Boulevard
1:50 - 2:10 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
046 ImpOliYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
70 0
69 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Principal Arterial
68 0
67 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, raised median w/ landscaping, striped shoulder 66 X 1
65 X 1 ADJACENT LAND USE: Commercial, restaurants, residential, equestrian center, school 64 X 1
63 X X X 3 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
62 X X X X 4
61 X X X 3 WEATHER: Clear
60 X X X X X X 6 *
59 X X X X X X X 7 * AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 34,436 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.20 miles 58 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
57 X X X 3 P
56 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 7 midblock collisions 55 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
54 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E ACCIDENT RATE: 0.15 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 53 X X X X 4 *
52 X X X X X X X X 8 *
51 X X X X X 5 * 85TH %: 60 M.P.H.
50 X X X 3
49 X X X X 4 50TH %: 56 M.P.H.
48 X X X 3
47 0 15TH %: 52 M.P.H.
46 0
45 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 56 M.P.H.
44 0
43 0 10 MPH PACE: 51 - 60 M.P.H.
42 0
41 0 % IN PACE: 77%
40 0
39 0 % OVER PACE: 13%
38 0
37 0 % UNDER PACE: 10%
36 0
35 0
34 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, verticval curve, El Cajon Trail 33 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
32 0
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 60 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
27 0
26 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
25 0
24 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
23 0
22 0
21 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
20 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
60 ROADWAY: Imperial Highway
1/30/2025
LIMITS: Yorba Linda Boulevard to Kellogg Drive
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1:30 - 1:50 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
047 ImpYorKel.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
70 0
69 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Principal Arterial
68 0
67 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, raised median, striped shoulder 66 X X X 3
65 X X X 3 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, freeway shoulder 64 X X X X X 5 *
63 X X X 3 * ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
62 X X X X X X X X 8 *
61 X X X X 4 P WEATHER: Clear
60 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
59 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 38,128 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 miles 58 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
57 X X X X X X 6 *
56 X X X X X X X X 8 * ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 3 midblock collisions 55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
54 X X X 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.14 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 53 X X X 3
52 X X X X 4
51 X 1 85TH %: 62 M.P.H.
50 X X 2
49 0 50TH %: 58 M.P.H.
48 X X 2
47 0 15TH %: 54 M.P.H.
46 0
45 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 58 M.P.H.
44 0
43 0 10 MPH PACE: 55 - 64 M.P.H.
42 0
41 0 % IN PACE: 79%
40 0
39 0 % OVER PACE: 6%
38 0
37 0 % UNDER PACE: 15%
36 0
35 0
34 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
33 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
32 0
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 60 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
27 0
26 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
25 0
24 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
23 0
22 0
21 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
20 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
60 ROADWAY: Imperial Highway
1/30/2025
LIMITS: Kellogg Drive to South City Limit
1:50 - 2:10 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
048 ImpKelSCL.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, yellow centerline, double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, car dealer
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,717 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.42 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 35 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 32 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 28 M.P.H.
41 X 1
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 32 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 5
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 4
36 X X 2 * % IN PACE: 81%
35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % OVER PACE: 11%
33 X X X X X X X X 8 P
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A % UNDER PACE: 8%
31 X X X X X 5 C
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
29 X X X X X X X 7 * ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, no left turn channelization, on-street parking, 28 X X X X X X X X 8 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X 6 * uncontrolled school crossigns, school zone 26 X X 2
25 X X X 3
24 X X X 3
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
25 ROADWAY: Jefferson Street
1/23/2025
LIMITS: Yorba Linda Boulevard to Cumberland Circle
1:25 - 2:15 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
049 JefYorCum.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow island, 61 0 two-way left turn center lane, bike lanes, striped shoulder 60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, golf course
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 9,342 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.48 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 0
49 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.20 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 X 1
47 0
46 X X 2 85TH %: 44 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 X X X X X X X 7 * 50TH %: 39 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X 5 *
42 X X X X X X X X 8 P 15TH %: 36 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X 6 A
40 X X X X X X X X 8 C AVERAGE SPEED: 39 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
36 X X X X X X X X 8 * % IN PACE: 84%
35 X X X 3
34 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 4%
33 0
32 X X X X 4 % UNDER PACE: 12%
31 X 1
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, bike lanes, uncontrolled ped/cart crossing 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
40 ROADWAY: Kellogg Drive
1/21/2025
LIMITS: Yorba Linda Boulevard to Mountain View Avenue
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
12:30 - 12:50 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
051 KelYorMou.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow island, bike lanes, striped 61 0 shoulder, on-street parking, 2 lanes each direction, double-double yellow island, bike lane (SB) 60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, freeway shoulder
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 X 1
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 9,734 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 miles 53 X 1
52 X X 2
51 X X X 3 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 X 1
49 X X 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X X X 9
47 X X X X 4 *
46 X X X X 4 * 85TH %: 48 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 X X X X X X X X 8 P 50TH %: 42 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X 5 A
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C 15TH %: 38 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
40 X X X X X X X 7 * AVERAGE SPEED: 43 M.P.H.
39 X X X 3 *
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * 10 MPH PACE: 38 - 47 M.P.H. 37 X X X X 4
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 72%
35 X 1
34 X 1 % OVER PACE: 19%
33 X 1
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 9%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, bike lanes, on-street parking, horizontal curvature 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
40 ROADWAY: Kellogg Drive
1/21/2025
LIMITS: Mountain View Avenue to Imperial Highway
12:20 - 1:15 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
052 KelMouImp.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction with a double yellow centerline segment, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,269 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.30 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 4.75 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 41 M.P.H.
45 X X X 3
44 0 50TH %: 36 M.P.H.
43 X X X X 4
42 X X X 3 15TH %: 29 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X 6 *
40 X X X X 4 * AVERAGE SPEED: 35 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X 7 A
36 X X X X 4 C % IN PACE: 64%
35 X X X X X 5 E
34 X X X X 4 * % OVER PACE: 10%
33 X X X X X X X X 8 *
32 X X X X X X X 7 * % UNDER PACE: 26%
31 X X X X 4
30 X X X X 4
29 X X X X X 5 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, on-street parking 28 X X X X X X 6 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X 4
26 X X 2
25 X 1
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
25 ROADWAY: Kodiak Mountain Drive
1/29/2025
LIMITS: Camino de Bryant to Alpine Lane
9:25 - 10:55 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
053 KodCamAlp.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, raised median w/ landscaping 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, park, vacant
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 14,579 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.32 miles 53 X 1
52 X X 2
51 X X X X X X 6 * ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 X X X 3 *
49 X X X X X X X X X 9 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X 7 P
47 X X X X X X X X 8 A
46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C 85TH %: 49 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
44 X X X X X X X X X 9 * 50TH %: 45 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
42 X X X X X X 6 * 15TH %: 42 M.P.H.
41 X X X X 4
40 X X 2 AVERAGE SPEED: 45 M.P.H.
39 X X 2
38 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 42 - 51 M.P.H.
37 X X 2
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 82%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 3%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 15%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, park, Santa Ana river trail adjacent to segment, 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0 flood control channel adjacent to segment
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
45 ROADWAY: La Palma Avenue
1/15/20205
LIMITS: Yorba Linda Boulevard to Western City Limit
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
10:20 - 10:40 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
054 LapYorWCL.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double-double yellow island, double yellow centerline, 61 0 two-way left turn center lane
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, offices, commercial, church, vacant 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 X X 2
56 X 1 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 X X X X X X X 7 * AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 22,173 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.78 miles 53 X X X X X X 6 *
52 X X X X X X 6 *
51 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 3 midblock collisions 50 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C ACCIDENT RATE: 0.16 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
47 X X X X X X 6 *
46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * 85TH %: 53 M.P.H.
45 X X X 3 *
44 X X 2 50TH %: 49 M.P.H.
43 X X X X 4
42 X X 2 15TH %: 46 M.P.H.
41 X X 2
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 49 M.P.H.
39 X 1
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 45 - 54 M.P.H.
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 85%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 3%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 12%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, Santa Ana river trail adjacent to segment, 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0 Santa Ana River adjacent to segment, railroad adjacent to segment 26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 50 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
50 ROADWAY: La Palma Avenue
1/15/2025
LIMITS: Western City Limit to Via Lomas de Yorba West
10:40 - 11:00 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
055 LapWCLVia.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double-double yellow island, double yellow centerline, 61 0 two-way left turn center lane
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, commercial, church, vacant 59 X 1
58 X 1 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 X X 2
56 X X X X X 5 WEATHER:
55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 X X X X X X X X 8 * AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 17,709 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.13 miles 53 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
52 X X X X X X 6 P
51 X X X X X 5 A ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E ACCIDENT RATE: 0.05 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X 7 *
47 X X X X X X 6 *
46 X X X X X X 6 * 85TH %: 54 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X 6
44 X 1 50TH %: 50 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X 5
42 X 1 15TH %: 46 M.P.H.
41 X 1
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 50 M.P.H.
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 46 - 55 M.P.H.
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 76%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 9%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 15%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, Santa Ana river trail adjacent to segment, 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0 Santa Ana River adjacent to segment
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 50 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
50 ROADWAY: La Palma Avenue
1/15/2025
LIMITS: Via Lomas de Yorba West to Via Lomas de Yorba East 11:00 - 11:20 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
056 LapViaVia.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double-double yellow island, double yellow centerline, raised median 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, commercial, restaurants, vacant 59 0
58 X 1 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 X X X X 4
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 X X X 3
54 X X X X X X X 7 * AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 13,771 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.51 miles 53 X X X X X X X 7 *
52 X X X X X 5 *
51 X X X X X X X 7 P ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 5 midblock collisions 50 X X X X X 5 A
49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C ACCIDENT RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X X 8 E
47 X X X X X 5 *
46 X X X X X X X X 8 * 85TH %: 53 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *
44 X X 2 50TH %: 48 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X 6
42 X X 2 15TH %: 44 M.P.H.
41 X X X X 4
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 48 M.P.H.
39 0
38 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 45 - 54 M.P.H.
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 76%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 8%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 16%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, Santa Ana river trail adjacent to segment, 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0 Santa Ana River adjacent to segment
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 50 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
50 ROADWAY: La Palma Avenue
1/15/2025
LIMITS: Via Lomas de Yorba East to Gypsum Canyon Road
11:20 - 11:40 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
057 LapViaGyp.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double-double yellow island, double yellow centerline 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, fire station, vacant 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 4,238 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.30 miles 53 X 1
52 X X X 3
51 X X 2 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 6 midblock collisions 50 0
49 X X X X X 5 ACCIDENT RATE: 4.35 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X X 2
47 X X X X 4 *
46 X X X X X X X X 8 * 85TH %: 47 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
44 X X X X 4 P 50TH %: 42 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X 7 A
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C 15TH %: 38 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
40 X X X X X X X 7 * AVERAGE SPEED: 43 M.P.H.
39 X X X 3 *
38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 38 - 47 M.P.H.
37 X X 2
36 X X X X X X 6 % IN PACE: 76%
35 X 1
34 0 % OVER PACE: 13%
33 0
32 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 11%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, Santa Ana river trail adjacent to segment, 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0 Santa Ana River adjacent to segment
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
45 ROADWAY: La Palma Avenue
1/15/2025
LIMITS: Gypsum Canyon Road to Camino de Bryant
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
11:40 AM - 12:00 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
058 LapGypCam.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, raised median w/ landscaping, bike lanes 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: School, park, agricultural
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 4,768 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.70 miles 53 X X 2
52 X X X 3
51 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 X 1
49 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.27 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X 6
47 X X X X X 5
46 X X X X 4 85TH %: 47 M.P.H.
45 X X X 3 *
44 X X X X X X X 7 * 50TH %: 41 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
42 X X X X X 5 P 15TH %: 36 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X 5 A
40 X X X X X 5 C AVERAGE SPEED: 41 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 M.P.H. 37 X X X 3 *
36 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % IN PACE: 68%
35 X X X 3
34 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 23%
33 X 1
32 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 9%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, bike lanes, trail 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
40 ROADWAY: Lakeview Avenue
1/14/2025
LIMITS: Valley View Avenue to Black Gold Drive
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
10:35 - 11:15 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
059 LakValBla.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, raised median w/ landscaping, bike lanes 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, park
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,325 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.63 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 X 1
49 X X 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X 5
47 X X X X X 5
46 X X X 3 85TH %: 46 M.P.H.
45 X X X 3 *
44 X X X X X X X 7 * 50TH %: 40 M.P.H.
43 X X X X 4 *
42 X X X X 4 P 15TH %: 36 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A
40 X X X X X X X X 8 C AVERAGE SPEED: 40 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
38 X X X X X X 6 * 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
36 X X X X X X X X 8 * % IN PACE: 73%
35 X X X 3
34 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 16%
33 X X X X 4
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 11%
31 X 1
30 0
29 X 1 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, bike lanes, trail 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
40 ROADWAY: Lakeview Avenue
1/14/2025
LIMITS: Black Gold Drive to Bastanchury Road
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
10:00 - 10:35 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
060 LakBlaBas.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: ` TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, two-way left turn center lan 61 0 double-double yellow island, yellow centerline, bike lanes, on-street parking, striped shoulders 60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, offices, entertainment, library, shopping center, restaurants 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 11,965 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.75 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.10 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 40 M.P.H.
45 X 1
44 X 1 50TH %: 36 M.P.H.
43 0
42 X X X X X X 6 15TH %: 33 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X 7 *
40 X X X X X X 6 * AVERAGE SPEED: 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X 8 A
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C % IN PACE: 84%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
34 X X X X X X X X 8 * % OVER PACE: 8%
33 X X X X 4 *
32 X X X X X X X 7 * % UNDER PACE: 8%
31 X X 2
30 X X X X 4
29 X 1 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, bike lanes, on-street parking, curbless segments 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X 1
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
35 ROADWAY: Lakeview Avenue
1/14/2025
LIMITS: Bastanchury Road to Yorba Linda Boulevard
9:40 - 10:00 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
061 LakBasYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Principal Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, two-way left turn center lan 61 0 double-double yellow island, striped shoulders, on-street parking 60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, church, school, shopping center, restaurants 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 16,754 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.63 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.17 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 42 M.P.H.
45 X X 2
44 X 1 50TH %: 38 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 X X X X X X X 7 * 15TH %: 35 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P AVERAGE SPEED: 38 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X 7 A
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 C 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X 8 E
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * % IN PACE: 93%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
34 X X X X X X X 7 * % OVER PACE: 3%
33 X X 2
32 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 4%
31 0
30 X 1
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, horizontal curvature, vertical curve, on-street parking, 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0 OC loop El Cajon trail
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
35 ROADWAY: Lakeview Avenue
1/14/2025
LIMITS: Yorba Linda Boulevard to Buena Vista Avenue
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9:00 - 9:20 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
062 LakYorBue.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Principal Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane one direction, 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, two-way left turn center lane 61 0 double-double yellow island, striped shoulders
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, vacant
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 15,079 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.62 miles 53 X 1
52 0
51 X X 2 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 6 midblock collisions 50 X X 2
49 X X X 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.59 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X 6 *
47 X X X 3 *
46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * 85TH %: 47 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
44 X X X X X X X 7 A 50TH %: 43 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
42 X X X X X X X 7 E 15TH %: 39 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X 7 *
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * AVERAGE SPEED: 43 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 X X X X 4 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 M.P.H.
37 X 1
36 X X X X X 5 % IN PACE: 78%
35 X X 2
34 X 1 % OVER PACE: 8%
33 0
32 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 14%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, curbless segments 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
40 ROADWAY: Lakeview Avenue
1/14/2025
LIMITS: Buena Vista Avenue to South City Limit
9:20 - 9:40 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
063 LakBueSCL.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow median island, on-street park 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, commercial, church, fire station, movie theater 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 4,044 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.30 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.50 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 33 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 29 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 24 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 29 M.P.H.
39 X X X 3
38 X X 2 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 M.P.H.
37 0
36 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 73%
35 X X 2
34 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 13%
33 X X X X X X X 7 *
32 X X X X X X X 7 * % UNDER PACE: 14%
31 X X X X X X X 7 *
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
29 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, horizontal curvature, on-street parking 28 X X X X X X X X 8 C NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
26 X X X 3 *
25 X X X X X X 6 *
24 X X X X 4 *
23 X X X X 4 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: NP M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X X 3
21 X X 2 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 X X X X 4
19 X 1 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
30 ROADWAY: Lemon Drive
1/16/2025
LIMITS: Imperial Highway to Lakeview Avenue
ESTABLISH
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
11:50 AM - 12:10 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
064 LemImpLak.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
60 0
59 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
58 0
57 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, undivided, raised median, on-street parking 56 0
55 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, self storage space, auto repair center, school 54 0
53 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
52 0
51 0 WEATHER: Clear
50 0
49 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 366 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.38 miles 48 0
47 0
46 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 45 0
44 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 43 0
42 0
41 0 85TH %: 27 M.P.H.
40 0
39 0 50TH %: 22 M.P.H.
38 0
37 0 15TH %: 18 M.P.H.
36 0
35 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 22 M.P.H.
34 0
33 0 10 MPH PACE: 18 - 27 M.P.H.
32 X X 2
31 X X X 3 % IN PACE: 76%
30 X 1
29 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 15%
28 X X X X X X 6
27 X X X X X 5 * % UNDER PACE: 9%
26 X X X X X 5 *
25 X X X X X X 6 *
24 X X X X 4 P ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, vertical curve, on-street parking, speed bumps 23 X X X X X X X X X 9 A NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
22 X X X X X X X 7 C
21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
20 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
19 X X X X X X 6 *
18 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: NP M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
17 X X 2
16 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
15 X X X X 4
14 X X 2 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
13 X 1
12 0
11 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
10 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
ESTABLISH
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
25 ROADWAY: Marda Avenue
2/19/2025
LIMITS: 4th Street to Valley View Avenue
9:00 AM - 12:00 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
065 MarFouVal.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow island 61 0 raised median
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Commercial, hospital
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 8,092 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.14 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.61 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 29 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 26 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 23 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 26 M.P.H.
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 M.P.H.
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 91%
35 X 1
34 X 1 % OVER PACE: 8%
33 X X 2
32 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 1%
31 X X X 3
30 X X X X X 5 *
29 X X X X X X X X 8 * ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature 28 X X X X X X X 7 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 P
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A
25 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
23 X X X X X X X X 8 * EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X X X X X 6 *
21 X X X X X 5 * ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 X 1
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
11:35 AM - 12:15 PM
30 ROADWAY: Mirage Street
1/29/2025
LIMITS: Crystal Drive to Oakcrest Circle
TRAFFIC No. 2838
066 MirCryOak.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, yellow centerline, double yellow centerline, shared lane markings 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,011 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.35 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 32 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 27 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 23 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 28 M.P.H.
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 M.P.H.
37 X 1
36 X X X X X 5 % IN PACE: 80%
35 X X X 3
34 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 11%
33 0
32 X X X X X X 6 * % UNDER PACE: 9%
31 X X X X X X 6 *
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
29 X X X X X X X X X 9 P ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, vertical curve, no left turn channelization, bike route, 28 X X X X X X X X 8 A NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C curbless segments
26 X X X X X X X X 8 E
25 X X X X X X 6 *
24 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
23 X X X X X X X 7 * EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X X X 4
21 X X X 3 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 X X 2
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1:15 - 1:50 PM
30 ROADWAY: Mountain View Avenue
1/21/2025
LIMITS: Ohio Street to Kellogg Drive
TRAFFIC No. 2838
067 MouOhiKel.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, raised median w/ landscaping 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, shopping center
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 9,534 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.27 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.36 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 31 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 27 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 25 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 28 M.P.H.
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 M.P.H.
37 0
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 93%
35 X 1
34 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 5%
33 X X X X 4 *
32 X X X X X X 6 * % UNDER PACE: 2%
31 X X X X X X X 7 *
30 X X X X X X 6 P
29 X X X X X X X 7 A ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve 28 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 E
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
24 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X 2
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
30 ROADWAY: New River Road
1/28/2025
LIMITS: Yorba Linda Boulevard to Esperanza Road
12:50 - 1:10 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
068 NewYorEsp.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, undivided, strped shoulder, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,137 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.37 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 4.29 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 34 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 29 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 24 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 29 M.P.H.
39 X 1
38 X X 2 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 M.P.H.
37 X X X 3
36 X X X 3 % IN PACE: 67%
35 X X X X X 5 *
34 X X X X 4 * % OVER PACE: 9%
33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
32 X X X X X X X 7 P % UNDER PACE: 24%
31 X X X X X X X 7 A
30 X X X X X X X 7 C
29 X X X X X X X 7 E ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, vertical curve, on-street parking, curbless segments 28 X X X X X X X X 8 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X 5 *
26 X X X X X X X 7 *
25 X X X X X 5
24 X X X X 4
23 X X X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X X 3
21 X X X X X X 6 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 X X X 3
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
30 ROADWAY: Ohio Street
1/16/2025
LIMITS: Oriente Drive to Yorba Linda Boulevard
12:10 - 1:25 PM
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
069 OhiOriYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, yellow centerline, striped shoulders, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, church
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,411 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.46 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 2.81 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 39 M.P.H.
45 0
44 X X X 3 50TH %: 32 M.P.H.
43 0
42 X X X X X 5 15TH %: 26 M.P.H.
41 X X X 3
40 X X X 3 AVERAGE SPEED: 32 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X 6
38 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 M.P.H.
37 X X X 3
36 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 62%
35 X X X X X 5 *
34 X X X X X X X X 8 * % OVER PACE: 28%
33 X X X X 4 *
32 X X X X X 5 P % UNDER PACE: 10%
31 X X X 3 A
30 X X X X X X X 7 C
29 X X X X X X X X X 9 E ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, horizontal curvature, no left turn channelization, on-street parking, 28 X X X X X X 6 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X 9 * curbless segments
26 X X X X X X 6 *
25 X X X 3
24 X X X 3
23 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X 1
21 X 1 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
ESTABLISH
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
12:35 - 1:30 PM
35 ROADWAY: Ohio Street
1/30/2025
LIMITS: Yorba Linda Boulevard to Mountain View Avenue
TRAFFIC No. 2838
070 OhiYorMou.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow island, 61 0 two-way left turn center lane, on-street parking
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Commercial, medical, hotel, offices 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,723 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.45 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 2.38 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 34 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 31 M.P.H.
43 0
42 X 1 15TH %: 26 M.P.H.
41 0
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 M.P.H.
39 X X 2
38 X X X X 4 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 M.P.H.
37 0
36 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 78%
35 X X X 3 *
34 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % OVER PACE: 12%
33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
32 X X X X X X X X 8 P % UNDER PACE: 10%
31 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
29 X X X X X X X X 8 E ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, horizontal curvature, on-street parking, uncontrolled crossing, 28 X X X X X X X 7 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X 6 * high accident rate.
26 X X X X X X X X 8 *
25 X X 2
24 X X X X X 5
23 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 X X 2 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
30 ROADWAY: Old Canal Road
1/29/2025
LIMITS: Mirage Street to Savi Ranch Parkway
Y
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
12:15 - 12:45 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
071 OldMirSav.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, undivided, double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,263 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.25 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.61 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 35 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 30 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 26 M.P.H.
41 X 1
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 30 M.P.H.
39 X 1
38 X X 2 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 5
36 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 75%
35 X X X X X 5
34 X X X X X X 6 * % OVER PACE: 19%
33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
32 X X X X X X 6 * % UNDER PACE: 6%
31 X X X X X 5 P
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
29 X X X X X X X X X 9 C ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, vertical curve, on-street parking, no left-turn channelization, 28 X X X X X X X X X 9 E NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X 8 * curbless segments
26 X X X X X 5 *
25 X X X X X X X 7 *
24 0
23 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 X 1 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 X X X 3
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
25 ROADWAY: Oriente Drive
1/21/2025
LIMITS: Lakeview Avenue to Avocado Avenue
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9:00 - 9:45 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
072 OriLakAvo.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, undivided, double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,258 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.25 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 32 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 27 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 23 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 27 M.P.H.
39 0
38 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 M.P.H.
37 X X X 3
36 0 % IN PACE: 71%
35 X X X X 4
34 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 14%
33 X X X 3
32 X X X X X 5 * % UNDER PACE: 15%
31 X X X X X X X 7 *
30 X X X X 4 *
29 X X X X X 5 P ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, vertical curve, on-street parking, no left-turn channelization 28 X X X X X X X X X 9 A NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
26 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
25 X X X X X X X 7 *
24 X X X X X X 6 *
23 X X X X 4 * EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X X 3
21 X X X X X X 6 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 X X X X 4
19 X X 2 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
25 ROADWAY: Oriente Drive
1/21/2025
LIMITS: Avocado Avenue to Ohio Street
9:45 - 11:35 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
073 OriAvoOhi.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, undivided, double yellow centerline 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 617 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.25 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 33 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 27 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 23 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 28 M.P.H.
39 0
38 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 M.P.H.
37 X 1
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 69%
35 X X 2
34 X X X X X X X X 8 * % OVER PACE: 6%
33 X X X X X X X 7 *
32 X X 2 * % UNDER PACE: 25%
31 X X X X 4 P
30 X X X X 4 A
29 X X X X X X X 7 C ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, no left-turn channelization, curbless segments 28 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
25 X X X X 4 *
24 X X X X X X X 7
23 X X X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X 2
21 X X X 3 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 X X X X 4
19 X X X X 4 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 X 1
17 0
16 X 1 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
25 ROADWAY: Oriente Drive
2/19/2025
LIMITS: Ohio Street to Palm Avenue
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
12:00 - 2:25 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
074 OriOhiPal.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, undivided, double yellow centerline 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, park, church
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER:
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,054 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.37 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 35 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 32 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 27 M.P.H.
41 X 1
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 M.P.H.
39 X 1
38 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 5
36 X X X X X 5 % IN PACE: 77%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
34 X X X X X X X 7 * % OVER PACE: 15%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
32 X X X X X X X X X 9 P % UNDER PACE: 8%
31 X X X X 4 A
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
29 X X X X X X X 7 E ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, no left-turn channelization, vertical curve, curbless segments 28 X X X X 4 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X 7 *
26 X X X X X X X 7 *
25 X X X X 4
24 X X 2
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X 2
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
30 ROADWAY: Palm Avenue
1/21/2025
LIMITS: Oriente Drive to Yorba Linda Boulevard
11:35 AM - 12:30 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
075 PalOriYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, raised median w/ landscape, bike lanes 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,566 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.51 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 X 1
47 0
46 X X 2 85TH %: 43 M.P.H.
45 X X X X 4
44 X X X X 4 50TH %: 38 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 X X X X X 5 * 15TH %: 34 M.P.H.
41 X X X 3 *
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P AVERAGE SPEED: 38 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 C 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X 6 E
36 X X X X 4 * % IN PACE: 77%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 *
34 X X X X X X 6 * % OVER PACE: 11%
33 X X X 3
32 X X X X X 5 % UNDER PACE: 12%
31 X 1
30 X X 2
29 X 1 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, bike lanes, bike/horse trail 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
40 ROADWAY: Paseo de las Palomas
1/28/2023
LIMITS: Fairmont Boulevard to Village Center Drive
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
2:00 - 2:35 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
076 PasFaiVil.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, raised median w/ landscape, bike lanes 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, park
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,693 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.37 miles 53 0
52 X 1
51 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 X 1
49 X X X X 4 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X 7 *
47 X X X X X X X X 8 *
46 X X X X X X 6 * 85TH %: 47 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X 6 P
44 X X X 3 A 50TH %: 42 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X 7 C
42 X X X X X X X X 8 E 15TH %: 36 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X 6 *
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * AVERAGE SPEED: 42 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 X X X X X X X 7 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 M.P.H.
37 X X X 3
36 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 67%
35 X X X 3
34 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 7%
33 X X 2
32 X X X 3 % UNDER PACE: 26%
31 X 1
30 0
29 X 1 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Vertical curve, bike lanes, bike/horse trail 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
40 ROADWAY: Paseo de las Palomas
1/28/2025
LIMITS: Village Center Drive to Paseo Del Prado
2:35 - 3:25 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
077 PasVilPas.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, raised median w/ landscape, double yellow centerline, 61 0 double-double yellow median island
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,895 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.56 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 42 M.P.H.
45 X X 2
44 X X X X 4 * 50TH %: 38 M.P.H.
43 X X X X 4 *
42 X X X X X X X X 8 * 15TH %: 35 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 A AVERAGE SPEED: 38 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X 7 *
36 X X X X X X X X 8 * % IN PACE: 85%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
34 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 2%
33 X 1
32 X X X 3 % UNDER PACE: 13%
31 X X X X X 5
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, bike/horse trail 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
35 ROADWAY: Paseo de las Palomas
1/29/2025
LIMITS: Paseo Del Prado to Yorba Linda Boulevard
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
12:45 - 1:30 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
078 PasPasYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, 'double-double yellow median island, striped shoul 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,451 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.85 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 X 1
49 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 X 1
47 X X X X 4
46 X X X X X X X 7 85TH %: 45 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X 6
44 X 1 50TH %: 39 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 X X X X X X 6 * 15TH %: 33 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X 6 *
40 X X X X 4 P AVERAGE SPEED: 39 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X 6 A
38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X 5 E
36 X X X X X X X 7 * % IN PACE: 63%
35 X X X 3 *
34 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % OVER PACE: 21%
33 X X X 3
32 X X X 3 % UNDER PACE: 16%
31 X X X X 4
30 X X 2
29 X X X 3 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, horizontal curvature, vertical curve, uncontrolled horse crossings, 28 X 1 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0 bike/horse trail
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
40 ROADWAY: Paseo Del Prado
1/29/2025
LIMITS: Paseo de las Palomas to Esperanza Road
1:30 - 3:15 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
079 PasPasEsp.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, undivided, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 543 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.24 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 32 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 27 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 24 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 28 M.P.H.
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 M.P.H.
37 X 1
36 X X X X X X 6 % IN PACE: 77%
35 X X 2
34 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 18%
33 X X 2
32 X X X 3 % UNDER PACE: 5%
31 X X X X X X 6 *
30 X X X X X X X X 8 *
29 X X X X X X X X 8 * ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, vertical curve, on-street parking 28 X X X X X X X X 8 P NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
26 X X X X X X X X 8 C
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
24 X X X X X X 6 *
23 X X X X 4 * EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X X X X 5 *
21 X 1 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 X X X 3
19 X 1 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
25 ROADWAY: Piper Place
1/16/2025
LIMITS: Plumosa Drive to Lakeview Avenue
ESTABLISH
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9:00 - 10:50 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
080 PipPluLak.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, commercial, school 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,837 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.55 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.90 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 32 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 27 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 24 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 28 M.P.H.
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 M.P.H.
37 X 1
36 0 % IN PACE: 81%
35 X X X 3
34 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 11%
33 X X X 3
32 X X X X X 5 * % UNDER PACE: 8%
31 X X 2 *
30 X X X X X 5 *
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, on-street parking, uncontrolled school crossing, school zone, 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C speed bumps
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
25 X X X X X X X 7 *
24 X X X X X X X 7 *
23 X X X X 4 * EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X X X 4
21 X 1 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 X X 2
19 X 1 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
25 ROADWAY: Plumosa Drive
1/16/2025
LIMITS: Bastanchury Road to Lemon Drive
ESTABLISH
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
10:50 - 11:50 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
081 PluBasLem.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, 'double-double yellow median island, on-street par 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, commercial, school 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,287 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.31 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 34 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 29 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 24 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 29 M.P.H.
39 X X 2
38 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 M.P.H.
37 0
36 X X X 3 % IN PACE: 78%
35 X X X X X 5
34 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 16%
33 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
32 X X X X X 5 * % UNDER PACE: 6%
31 X X X X 4 *
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
29 X X X X X X X X 8 A ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, on-street parking 28 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
26 X X X X X X 6 *
25 X X X X X X 6 *
24 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
23 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X 2
21 X 1 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 X 1
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
35 ROADWAY: Prospect Avenue
1/23/2025
LIMITS: Wabash Avenue to Imperial Highway
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9:20 - 10:10 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
082 ProWabImp.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, parking lot
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,559 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.20 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 39 M.P.H.
45 X 1
44 X 1 50TH %: 34 M.P.H.
43 0
42 X 1 15TH %: 30 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X 6
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 34 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 X X X 3 * 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X 6 *
36 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P % IN PACE: 76%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C % OVER PACE: 10%
33 X X X X 4 E
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * % UNDER PACE: 14%
31 X X X X X X 6 *
30 X X X X X X X 7 *
29 X X X X X X 6 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, no left-turn channelization, on-street parking, curbless segments 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X 2
26 X 1
25 X X X X 4
24 X 1
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
35 ROADWAY: Prospect Avenue
1/23/2025
LIMITS: Imperial Highway to Bastanchury Road
12:25 - 12:55 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
083 ProImpBas.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, yellow centerline, double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, medical offices, farm 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,715 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.37 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 3 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 2.70 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 38 M.P.H.
45 X 1
44 0 50TH %: 34 M.P.H.
43 X 1
42 X X 2 15TH %: 29 M.P.H.
41 X X 2
40 X X 2 AVERAGE SPEED: 34 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 5 *
38 X X X X 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 5 *
36 X X X X X X X 7 P % IN PACE: 75%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C % OVER PACE: 8%
33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
32 X X X X X X 6 * % UNDER PACE: 17%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
30 X X X 3 *
29 X X X X X 5 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, no left-turn channelization, on-street parking, uncontrolled 28 X X X X 4 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X 3 school/horse crossing, El Cajon trail, curbless segments 26 X 1
25 X X X 3
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X 1
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
35 ROADWAY: Prospect Avenue
1/23/2025
LIMITS: Bastanchury Road to Yorba Linda Boulevard
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
12:55 - 1:25 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
084 ProBasYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane one direction, 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, two-way left turn center lane 61 0 striped shoulder
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, farm, church, commercial, shopping center 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 X X 2 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 9,911 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.56 miles 53 X 1
52 X 1
51 X X X 3 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 X X X X X 5
49 X X X 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X X 7
47 X X X 3
46 X X X X X X X X 8 * 85TH %: 48 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
44 X X X X X X X X 8 * 50TH %: 44 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
42 X X X X X X X X 8 A 15TH %: 38 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X 6 C
40 X X X X X X X 7 E AVERAGE SPEED: 44 M.P.H.
39 X X X 3 *
38 X X X X X X X 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 4 *
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 70%
35 X X X 3
34 0 % OVER PACE: 25%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 5%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, vertical curve 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
45 ROADWAY: Richfield Road
1/30/2025
LIMITS: Yorba Linda Boulevard to Buena Vista Avenue
10:35 - 10:55 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
085 RicYorBue.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, two-way left turn center lane 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 X 1 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7,810 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.65 miles 53 X X 2
52 X X X X X 5
51 X X X X X 5 * ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 X X X 3 *
49 X X X X X X X 7 * ACCIDENT RATE: 0.36 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.93 acc/mvm 48 X X X X X X 6 P
47 X X X X X X 6 A
46 X X X X X X X X X 9 C 85TH %: 50 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
44 X X X X X X X X 8 * 50TH %: 45 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
42 X X X X X X X X 8 * 15TH %: 41 M.P.H.
41 X X X 3
40 X X X 3 AVERAGE SPEED: 45 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 5
38 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 42 - 51 M.P.H.
37 X 1
36 0 % IN PACE: 75%
35 X 1
34 X 1 % OVER PACE: 8%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 17%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Flood control channel adjacent to segment 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
10:15 - 10:35 AM
45 ROADWAY: Richfield Road
1/30/2025
LIMITS: Buena Vista Avenue to Southern City Limit
TRAFFIC No. 2838
086 RicBueSCL.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Minor Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, two-way left turn center lane, striped shoulder 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 20,880 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.25 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 X X 2 * 85TH %: 44 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
44 X X X X X X X X 8 * 50TH %: 41 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X 8 P
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A 15TH %: 38 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E AVERAGE SPEED: 41 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
38 X X X X X X X 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 95%
35 X 1
34 X 1 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 5%
31 0
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, vertical curve 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
40 ROADWAY: Rose Drive
1/23/2025
LIMITS: Blake Road to Wabash Avenue
3:00 - 3:20 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
087 RosBlaWab.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Principal Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow median island, 61 0 two-way left turn center lane, on-street parking
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, commercial, church, school 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 13,737 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.35 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 X X X 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 0
47 X 1
46 X X X X 4 85TH %: 45 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
44 X X X X X 5 * 50TH %: 41 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P 15TH %: 37 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X 8 A
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C AVERAGE SPEED: 41 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X 7 E
38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 5 *
36 X X X X X X 6 * % IN PACE: 83%
35 X X X X X 5
34 0 % OVER PACE: 8%
33 X 1
32 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 9%
31 X 1
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, school zone, on-street parking 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
40 ROADWAY: Rose Drive
1/23/2025
LIMITS: Imperial Highway to Bastanchury Road
2:35 - 3:00 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
088 RosImpBas.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Principal Arterial
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow median island, raised media 61 0 two-way left turn center lane, striped shoulder, on-street parking 60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, medical offices, church, school, shopping center 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 15,220 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.75 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 0
49 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.16 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 X 1
47 X 1
46 X X X 3 85TH %: 44 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X X X X 8 *
44 X X X X X X 6 * 50TH %: 41 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P 15TH %: 37 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 C AVERAGE SPEED: 41 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
38 X X X X X 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 5 *
36 X X X X X 5 * % IN PACE: 86%
35 X X X X 4
34 0 % OVER PACE: 6%
33 X 1
32 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 8%
31 X 1
30 0
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, on-street parking, school zone, El Cajon trail 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
40 ROADWAY: Rose Drive
1/23/2025
LIMITS: Bastanchury Road to Yorba Linda Boulevard
2:15 - 2:35 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
089 RosBasYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, yellow centerline, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow median isla 61 0 raised median, on-street parking
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, park
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,050 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.02 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 32 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 29 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 26 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 29 M.P.H.
39 X 1
38 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 M.P.H.
37 X 1
36 X 1 % IN PACE: 89%
35 X X X X X 5
34 X 1 % OVER PACE: 10%
33 X X X X X 5 *
32 X X X X X X X X 8 * % UNDER PACE: 1%
31 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 A ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, horizontal curvature, vertical curves, on-street parking, bike/horse trail 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X 8 E
26 X X X X X 5 *
25 X X X X X 5 *
24 X X X X X X X 7 *
23 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
25 ROADWAY: San Antonio Road
1/28/2025
LIMITS: Fairmont Boulevard to Alder Avenue
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9:50 - 10:35 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
090 SanFaiAld.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow median island, 61 0 raised median w/ landscaping
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, park
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,150 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.36 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 38 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 35 M.P.H.
43 0
42 X 1 15TH %: 31 M.P.H.
41 X X X 3
40 X X X X 4 AVERAGE SPEED: 35 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 5 *
38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X 8 *
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P % IN PACE: 85%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 A
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C % OVER PACE: 8%
33 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
32 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % UNDER PACE: 7%
31 X X X X X X X X 8 *
30 X X X X X 5 *
29 X X X X 4 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curves, bike/horse trail, uncontrolled horse crossing, 28 X 1 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0 Flood control channel adjacent to segment
26 X X 2
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
30 ROADWAY: San Antonio Road
1/28/2025
LIMITS: Alder Avenue to Yorba Linda Boulevard
9:00 - 9:50 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
091 SanAldYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, raised median w/ landscaping, two-way left turn center lane 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Medical offices, commercial
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7,160 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.45 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 4 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.12 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 X 1
47 X 1
46 X 1 85TH %: 41 M.P.H.
45 X X X 3
44 0 50TH %: 37 M.P.H.
43 X X X X 4
42 X X X X 4 15TH %: 33 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X 5 *
40 X X X X X X 6 * AVERAGE SPEED: 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X 7 *
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
36 X X X X X X X 7 C % IN PACE: 78%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
34 X X X X X X X X 8 * % OVER PACE: 14%
33 X X X X X X X 7 *
32 X X X X X X 6 * % UNDER PACE: 8%
31 X X 2
30 X 1
29 X X 2 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways
28 X 1 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X 1
26 X 1
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
35 ROADWAY: Savi Ranch Parkway
1/29/2025
LIMITS: Weir Canyon Road to Old Canal Road
10:55 - 11:35 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
092 SavWeiOld.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, raised median w/ landscaping, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, school, vacant
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,960 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.99 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 35 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 29 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 25 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 30 M.P.H.
39 X X X 3
38 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 M.P.H.
37 X X 2
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 74%
35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 X X X X X X X 7 * % OVER PACE: 10%
33 X X X 3 *
32 X X X X X 5 P % UNDER PACE: 16%
31 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
30 X X X X X X X X 8 C
29 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, horizontal curvature, vertical curve, no left turn channelization, 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X 5 * on-street parking
26 X X X X X X X X 8 *
25 X X X X X 5
24 X X X X X X 6
23 X X X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X X 2
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
25 ROADWAY: Stonehaven Drive
1/28/2025
LIMITS: Via De La Roca to Yorba Linda Boulevard
11:45 AM - 12:50 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
093 StoViaYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow median island, 61 0 raised median w/ landscaping
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, park
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,375 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.91 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 4 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.70 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 X X 2
46 0 85TH %: 42 M.P.H.
45 X X X X X 5
44 X X 2 50TH %: 37 M.P.H.
43 X X X X 4
42 X X X X X X X X 8 * 15TH %: 32 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X 7 *
40 X X X X X 5 * AVERAGE SPEED: 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 5 P
38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X 7 C
36 X X X X X X X X 8 E % IN PACE: 70%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
34 X X X X X 5 * % OVER PACE: 13%
33 X X X X X 5 *
32 X X X X X X X 7 % UNDER PACE: 17%
31 X X X X X 5
30 X 1
29 X X X 3 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, Redwood Grove Trailhead 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X 1
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
35 ROADWAY: Valley View Circle
1/23/2025
LIMITS: Valley View Circle (West) to West of Valley View Avenue N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
11:25 AM - 12:25 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
094 ValValVal.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, double-double yellow median island, 61 0 raised median w/ landscaping
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, golf course, water district 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,995 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.48 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 36 M.P.H.
45 0
44 X 1 50TH %: 32 M.P.H.
43 X X 2
42 X 1 15TH %: 28 M.P.H.
41 X 1
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 32 M.P.H.
39 X X X X 4
38 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 M.P.H.
37 X X X 3
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % IN PACE: 76%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 *
34 X X X X 4 * % OVER PACE: 14%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A % UNDER PACE: 10%
31 X X X X X X 6 C
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
29 X X X X X X X X 8 * ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, uncoltrolled crossing, trails 28 X X X X 4 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X 5 *
26 X X X X X 5
25 0
24 X X X X X 5
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
35 ROADWAY: Valley View Circle
1/23/2025
LIMITS: Valley View Circle (East) to North of Valley View Avenue 10:30 - 11:25 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
095 ValValVal.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local/Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, raised median w/ landscaping 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, school
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7,904 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.17 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 X X 2
47 0
46 X X X X X 5 85TH %: 43 M.P.H.
45 X 1
44 X X X X X 5 * 50TH %: 39 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
42 X X X X X X X 7 * 15TH %: 34 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X 6 P
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A AVERAGE SPEED: 39 M.P.H. 39 X X X X 4 C
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X 7 *
36 X X X X X 5 * % IN PACE: 74%
35 X X X X X 5 *
34 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 8%
33 X X X X X X X 7
32 X X X X X 5 % UNDER PACE: 18%
31 0
30 X X 2
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, school zone 28 X 1 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
35 ROADWAY: Valley View Avenue
1/23/2025
LIMITS: Lakeview Avenue to Brooklyn Avenue
10:10 - 10:30 AM
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
096 ValLakBro.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 2 lanes each direction, segments of 2 SB lanes and 1 NB lane, double yellow centerline, two-way 61 0 turn center lane, double-double yellow median island, raised median w/ landscaping, on-street par 60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, medical offices, commercial 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 9,010 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.34 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 2 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.60 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 X X 2 85TH %: 42 M.P.H.
45 X X 2
44 X X X X X X 6 50TH %: 37 M.P.H.
43 X X X X 4
42 X X X X 4 * 15TH %: 33 M.P.H.
41 X X X 3 *
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * AVERAGE SPEED: 37 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X 7 P
38 X X X X X X X X 8 A 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E % IN PACE: 75%
35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 X X X X X X X X 8 * % OVER PACE: 14%
33 X X X X X X 6 *
32 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 11%
31 X X 2
30 X X 2
29 X X X 3 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, vertical curve, on-street parking 28 X 1 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 X 1
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
35 ROADWAY: Valley View Avenue
3/4/20205
LIMITS: Brooklyn Avenue to Imperial Highway
11:50 AM - 12:15 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
097 ValBroImp.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME : 1:00 - 1:37 65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, two-way left turn center lane, raised median, 61 0 double-double yellow median island, on-street parking 60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, park, commercial
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER:
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 8,678 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.67 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.16 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 X 1
47 X 1
46 0 85TH %: 42 M.P.H.
45 X X 2
44 X X X X X X X X 8 * 50TH %: 39 M.P.H.
43 X X X X X 5 *
42 X X X X X X X X 8 * 15TH %: 36 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A AVERAGE SPEED: 39 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 C
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
36 X X X X X X X X 8 * % IN PACE: 88%
35 X X X 3 *
34 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 3%
33 X X 2
32 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 9%
31 X 1
30 0
29 X 1 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, uncontrolled crossing, on-street parking, El Cajon trail 28 X 1 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Ruben Perales
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 117 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
40 ROADWAY: Valley View Avenue
3/27/2025
LIMITS: Imperial Highway to Yorba Linda Boulevard
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
098 ValImpYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, on-street parking 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, school, SCE substation 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 4,226 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.59 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 5 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.83 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 39 M.P.H.
45 0
44 X 1 50TH %: 35 M.P.H.
43 X 1
42 X X X X X 5 15TH %: 31 M.P.H.
41 X X 2
40 X X X X 4 * AVERAGE SPEED: 35 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 5 *
38 X X X X X X X X 8 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
36 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A % IN PACE: 83%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E % OVER PACE: 9%
33 X X X X X X X 7 *
32 X X X X X X 6 * % UNDER PACE: 8%
31 X X X X X X X X 8 *
30 X X X 3
29 X 1 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Multiple driveways, vertical curve, no left turn channelization, on-street parking, 28 X 1 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X 2 uncontrolled crossings, school zone
26 0
25 X 1
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
35 ROADWAY: Van Buren Street
1/30/2025
LIMITS: Yorba Linda Boulevard to Buena Vista Avenue
9:00 - 9:30 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
099 VanYorBue.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline, two-way left turn center lane, 61 0 double-double yellow median island
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,874 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.34 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.45 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 X 1
46 X X 2 85TH %: 41 M.P.H.
45 X 1
44 0 50TH %: 37 M.P.H.
43 X X X X 4 *
42 X X X X 4 * 15TH %: 35 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X X 8 *
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 P AVERAGE SPEED: 38 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
38 X X X X X X X X X 9 C 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % IN PACE: 88%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 *
34 X X X X X 5 * % OVER PACE: 4%
33 X X X X 4
32 X 1 % UNDER PACE: 8%
31 X X 2
30 X 1
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Vertical curve
28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
40 ROADWAY: Van Buren Street
1/30/2025
LIMITS: Buena Vista Avenue to Alta Vista Street
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9:30 - 9:50 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
100 VanBueAlt.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Major Collector
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, vacant
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,732 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.04 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 1 midblock collisions 50 0
49 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 3.66 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 X 1
47 0
46 X X X X X 5 85TH %: 43 M.P.H.
45 X X X 3
44 X X X X X 5 50TH %: 39 M.P.H.
43 X X X X 4 *
42 X X X X X X 6 * 15TH %: 35 M.P.H.
41 X X X X X X X 7 *
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 P AVERAGE SPEED: 39 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
36 X X X X X X 6 * % IN PACE: 76%
35 X X X X 4 *
34 X X X X X X 6 * % OVER PACE: 15%
33 X X X 3
32 X X X 3 % UNDER PACE: 9%
31 X 1
30 X X 2
29 0 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Bike route, bike shared marking 28 0 NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 0
26 0
25 0
24 0
23 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
40 ROADWAY: Van Buren Street
1/30/2025
LIMITS: Alta Vista Street to Southern City Limit (230') 9:50 - 10:15 AM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
101 VanAltSCL.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential
59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1,572 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.27 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 32 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 29 M.P.H.
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 25 M.P.H.
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 29 M.P.H.
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 M.P.H.
37 X 1
36 X 1 % IN PACE: 84%
35 X 1
34 X X X X X 5 % OVER PACE: 8%
33 X X X X 4 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * % UNDER PACE: 8%
31 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
29 X X X X X X X X X 9 A ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, trail 28 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X 7 E
26 X X X X X X X 7 *
25 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
24 X X X X X X 6 *
23 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 X 1
21 X X X X X 5 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H. 20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
10:35 - 11:45 AM
30 ROADWAY: Via del Agua
1/28/2025
LIMITS: Via De La Roca to Yorba Linda Boulevard
TRAFFIC No. 2838
102 ViaViaYor.xlsx
SPEED VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND WESTBOUND VEHICLES DATE: TIME :
65 0
64 0 STREET CLASIFICATION: Local
63 0
62 0 ROADWAY DESCRIPTION: 1 lane each direction, double yellow centerline 61 0
60 0 ADJACENT LAND USE: Residential, commercial, vacant 59 0
58 0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS: Good
57 0
56 0 WEATHER: Clear
55 0
54 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,586 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.55 miles 53 0
52 0
51 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY DATES: 1/1/2021 - 12/31/2023 (3 years) # OF ACCIDENTS: 0 midblock collisions 50 0
49 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 37 M.P.H.
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 33 M.P.H.
43 X 1
42 0 15TH %: 28 M.P.H.
41 X X 2
40 X X 2 AVERAGE SPEED: 33 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 5
38 X X X X X 5 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 4
36 X X X X X X X 7 * % IN PACE: 78%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
34 X X X X 4 * % OVER PACE: 19%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
32 X X X X X X X X 8 A % UNDER PACE: 3%
31 X X X X 4 C
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
29 X X X X X X 6 * ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Horizontal curvature, vertical curve, trail 28 X X X X X X 6 * NOT APPARENT TO DRIVERS:
27 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
26 X X 2
25 0
24 0
23 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N):
22 0
21 0 ROADWAY SHARED WITH: PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT: M.P.H.
20 0
19 0 SHARED JURISDICTION SPEED: M.P.H.
18 0
17 0
16 0 OBSERVED BY: Counts Unlimited, Inc.
15 0
GRAND TOTALS 100 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
30 ROADWAY: Via Lomas de Yorba
1/15/2025
LIMITS: La Palma Avenue to Foxtail Drive
N
CITY OF YORBA LINDA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3:00 - 3:50 PM
TRAFFIC No. 2838
103 ViaLapFox.xlsx