Agenda — Yreka City Council, December 20, 2022

Page 1 of 7 ends

YREKA CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA AMENDED
December 20, 2022
Closed Session: 5:30 PM
Regular Session: 6:30 PM
Yreka City Council Chamber, 701 Fourth Street, Yreka,
CA
Regular Meetings of the Yreka City Council are held the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of every month.

The full agenda packet can be found on the City’s website: www.ci.yreka.ca.us/AgendaCenter

1. CALL TO ORDER:

2. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION:

3. CLOSED SESSION:

Third Party Negotiation: Nor-Cal Products by Pfeiffer Vacuum City Negotiation: City Manager and City Attorney
Negotiating Parties: City of Yreka and Nor-Cal Products by Pfeiffer Vacuum Under Negotiation: Possible purchase agreement including price, terms of payment, or both.

Join this meeting via Zoom:

Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6194957056
Meeting ID# 619-495-7056
Members of the public may also remotely listen to and participate in the meeting via teleconference. If you wish to listen or participate in this meeting through teleconference, simply dial into the conference number below, and enter the meeting ID#.

Conference call in Number: 669-900-6833 (Toll-Free 888 788 0099) “RAISE YOUR HAND” to provide public comment for your desired item. Speakers will be asked to identify themselves.
• Online: If you are online, click on “raise hand” on the bottom of your screen. • Mobile App: In the mobile app, you can raise your hand by tapping the "Raise Hand" option in the "More" tab.
• Telephone: If you are calling in via telephone, to raise your hand, dial *9 (star-nine). Speakers will be called on by the last four digits of their phone number. To unmute yourself dial *6 (star-six). 1 Agenda Amended 12/19/22 to
remove closed session item 3.b.

Page 2 of 7 ends

b. Conference with Real Property Negotiations (§ 54956.8) Property: Fall Creek Water Diversion Facilities
Third Party Negotiation: Klamath River Renewal Corporation (KRRC) City Negotiation: City Manager and City Attorney
Negotiating Parties: City of Yreka and KRRC
Under Negotiation: Agreement on Payment for Past Expenses Related to the Potential Impacts of Lower Klamath Project on the City of Yreka’s Water Diversion Facilities.
c. Conference with Labor Negotiator Government Code § 54957.6(a) Agency negotiators: City Manager Ledbetter, Assistant City Manager Hogan, Human Resources Director Elsnab
Employee Organization: Yreka Management Association

4. OPTIONAL RECESS IF DESIRED:

5. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 6:30 PM:

Announcement of any action taken by the City Council in Closed Session required by the Ralph M. Brown Act. (Government Code § 54950 et. seq.)

6. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

7. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND/OR ANNOUNCEMENTS:

This time slot is for informational presentations, appointments, or awards to be presented by the City Council or to the City Council.

Recognition of Outgoing Planning Commissioners and Swearing in of Incoming Planning Commissioners.

8. PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Public participation is welcomed and invited at all City Council meetings. Time is reserved at each regular meeting for those in the audience who wish to address the City Council. The City requests that persons addressing the City Council refrain from making personal, slanderous, profane, or disruptive remarks.

Councilmembers, when recognized by the Mayor, may ask questions of presenter but no action may be taken by the City Council during the public comment section of the meeting. Under the Brown Act, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not listed on the posted agenda. • Please speak into the microphone from the podium. The podium electronically adjusts up and down to accommodate speaker. (Should you need an additional special accommodation, e.g., remote microphone, please notice the City Clerk prior to the start of meeting for arrangements). • Please state your name for the record prior to providing your comments. • Please address the Council as a whole.
• If you have documents to present, please provide a minimum of seven (7) copies. • Please limit your remarks to five (5) minutes.

Public comments period is not intended to be a “Question and Answer” period or conversations with the Council or City staff.

9. PUBLIC COMMENT FOLLOW-UP:

This is the time for City Council or the City Manager to respond to public comments and may direct staff to prepare a report or place an item on a future agenda.
2

Page 3 of 7 ends

10. CONSENT AGENDA:

All matters listed under the consent agenda are considered routine and non-controversial and will be enacted by one motion unless any member of the Council wishes to remove an item for discussion, a. Approval/ratification of payments issued from November 28, 2022, through December 11, 2022. b. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting held December 6, 2022. c. Approval of Minutes of the Special Meeting held December 13, 2022. d. Approval of the Transportation Claim for the Local Transportation Fund for Fiscal Year 2022/23 and Authorizing the Mayor to Sign the Claim on Behalf of the City. e. Adopt a Resolution 2022-55 naming Emily Aldrich, Finance Director as a City delegate who is eligible to review confidential sales tax data with HdL. f. Cash Balances, Investment and Fiscal Performance Reports for June 2022 g. Cash Balances and Fiscal Performance Reports for July 2022 h. Cash Balances and Fiscal Performance Reports for August 2022 i. Approval of 2021-22 Closing Budget Revisions.
j. Continuation of Urgency Ordinance #864: Fireworks.
k. Continuation of Urgency Resolution #2021-51: Remote Public Meetings. l. Waive Full Text Reading of All Ordinances on the Agenda. Ordinances shall be introduced and adopted by title only.

Recommended City Council Action (after the Mayor’s request for public comment): Motion to Adopt the Consent Agenda of the City Council of the City of Yreka as presented.

11. OLD BUSINESS
Human Resources Director
a. Agenda Title: Approval of the Yreka Employees’ Association (YEA) Memorandum of Understanding
Representatives for the City and YEA have met and agreed upon compensation over the next thirty months for wages, benefits (including healthcare coverage) and other compensation (like callout pay, remote pay and deferred compensation).

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopt a Resolution 2022-56 of the City Council of the City of Yreka approving execution of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Yreka and the Yreka Employee’s Association.
b. Agenda Title: Approval of the City of Yreka Compensation Resolution for Unrepresented Employees (Department Heads).

The City Manager has met with Labor Consultant to recognize wage and benefit compensation for Department Heads over the next thirty months for wages, benefits (includes healthcare coverage) and other compensation (like deferred compensation), incorporating many of the provisions that were afforded to other represented units within the City.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopt a Compensation Resolution 2022-57 of the City Council of the City of Yreka for Unrepresented Employees (Department Heads). 3

Page 4 of 7 ends

12. PUBLIC HEARINGS:

Public Hearing Protocol:
i. Mayor will describe the purpose of the Public Hearing. ii. City Staff will provide the Staff Report.
iii. City Staff will respond to questions from the City Council. iv. Mayor will open the Public Hearing.
v. Public wanting to comment will come to the podium, provide the City Clerk with their name and address, and provide their comments.
vi. Mayor will close the Public Hearing.
vii. City Council will deliberate and act on the item.

Finance Director/Assistant City Manager
a. Agenda Title: Approving the Development Impact Fee Report and Updating the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee (Rate) Program i. The City is reporting on its annual collection and use of fee revenue received during the fiscal year 2021-2022.
ii. As part of the annual report to the public on developer impact (connection) fees the City asked Pace Engineering to review its connection fees for water and wastewater utilities. The report from Paul Reuter, PACE Engineering evaluated both the water and wastewater systems. The report remediated the lack of a sewer treatment plant connection fee and updated the rates to reflect anticipated growth and Capital Improvements Plan for the water and wastewater system.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to approve City Council Resolution 2022-58 approving the Development Impact Fee Report and Updating the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee (Rate) Program.

13. NEW BUSINESS:

Planning Director
a. Agenda Title: California Housing and Community Development, Prohousing Designation Program City Staff has developed an application to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for a “Prohousing Designation”. The Prohousing Housing Designation identifies local policies that jurisdictions are adopting to address housing needs and affordability and identifies State programs and grants for which Prohousing designated jurisdictions should receive preference or additional points. City Staff are requesting City Council review of the proposed activities to achieve a Pro Housing Designation and authorize the submittal of the application to HCD.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to approve Resolution CCR-2022-59 A Resolution of the City of Yreka City Council Authorizing Application to and Participation in the Prohousing Designation Program.
b. Agenda Title: Regional Early Action Program (REAP) 2.0 Grant Application City staff in collaboration with Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. (city’s on-call planning contractor) have prepared two recommended activities for the REAP 2.0 grant application:

1. Comprehensive update to the City’s zoning, development, and subdivision regulations

2. Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for General Plan and code updates 4

Page 5 of 7 ends

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to approve Resolution 2022-60 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka Authorizing the City Manager to Submit a REAP 2.0 Grant Application on Behalf of the City of Yreka with Selected Project Activities.

City Manager/City Attorney
c. Agenda Title: Agreement on Payment for Past Expenses Related to Potential Impacts of Lower Klamath Project on the City of Yreka’s Water Diversion Facilities The City of Yreka incurred expenses for activities of its City Attorney and a technical consultant, Ms. Gretchen Umlauf, to prepare a Habitat Conservation Plan as a potential method for compliance with respect to the diversion facilities; and the City Attorney has provided the KRRC with appropriate documentation of such expenses.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopted a Resolution 2022-61 of the City Council of the City of Yreka to Approve the Agreement on Payment for Past Expenses Related to Potential Impacts of Lower Klamath Project on the City of Yreka’s Water Diversion Facilities Police Chief
d. Agenda Title: Procurement of SunRidge RIMS/CAD software, as sole source provider, for Yreka Police Department and utilizing the City’s Federal Asset Forfeiture reserves.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Approve Resolution 2022-62 e. Agenda Title: Memorandum of Understanding between the Siskiyou County Health and Human Services and the City of Yreka Police Department for Homeless Liaison Officer services.

The Yreka Police Chief and Siskiyou County Health and Human Services Agency have met to address the needs to mutually serve the City’s unhoused, homeless population. The result of these meetings is a cooperative MOU agreement for specialized police services. The term of the agreement is retroactive from October 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, or until terminated by either party.

The agreement would compensate the City $160,000 annually for the services of a Homeless Liaison Officer. The Yreka Police Department Homeless Liaison Officer(s) is responsible for making connections between those experiencing homelessness and the resources available to further their specific housing and services goals. This includes, but is not limited to, making referrals to providers of housing/shelter programs, mental health treatment, substance use treatment, mainstream benefits, education, and employment training. Additionally, the Homeless Liaison Officer will also provide a monthly report to the Continuum of Care (CoC) Advisory Board.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopt a Resolution 2022-63 authorizing the City Manager or his delegate to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the Siskiyou County Health and Human Services and the City of Yreka Police Department for Homeless Liaison Officer Services
City Council Committee Appointments
f. Agenda Title: Mayor’s committee appointments.
5

Page 6 of 7 ends

Mayor will announce committee member selections for various working committees where a Councilmember is a member representing the City of Yreka.

14. MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBERS REPORTS
AB 1234* Conference and Meeting Report (verbal, if any) *(In accordance with AB 1234, Councilmembers shall make a brief report or file a written report on any meeting/event/conference attended at City expense.)

15. CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS:

City Manager and Staff may make brief announcements or reports at this time.

16. COUNCILMEMBER STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS:

Members of the Council may make brief announcements, reports, or request staff to report to Council on any matter at a subsequent meeting.

17. ADJOURNMENT:

In compliance with the requirements of the Brown Act, notice of this meeting has been posted in a publicly accessible place, 72 hours in advance of the meeting.

All documents produced by the City which are related to an open session agenda item and distributed to the City Council are made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office during normal business hours.

Public Hearings: If, in the future, you wish to challenge in court any of the matters on an agenda for which a public hearing is to be conducted, you may be limited to raising only those issues which you (or someone else) raised orally at the public hearing or in written correspondence received by the City at or before the hearing. Any person seeking to challenge a City Council decision made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes “final.”
"CHALLENGING DECISIONS OF CITY ENTITIES The time limit within which to commence any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City of Yreka is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, unless a shorter limitation period is specified by any other provision, including without limitation Government Code section 65009 applicable to many land use and zoning decisions, Government Code section 66499.37 applicable to the Subdivision Map Act, and Public Resources Code section 21167 applicable to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Under Section 1094.6, any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which such decision becomes final. Any lawsuit or legal challenge, which is not filed within that 90-day period, will be barred. Government Code section 65009 and 66499.37, and Public Resources Code section 21167, impose shorter limitations periods and requirements, including timely service in addition to filing. If a person wishes to challenge the above actions in court, they may be limited to raising only those issues they or someone else raised at the meeting described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Yreka, at or prior to the meeting. In addition, judicial challenge may be limited or barred where the interested party has not sought and exhausted all available administrative remedies." The City of Yreka does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, age, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or any other legally protected classes in employment or provision of services. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, those requiring accommodations for this meeting should notify the City Clerk 48 hours prior to the meeting at (530) 841-2386 or by notifying the Clerk at [email protected].

AFFIDAVIT OF NOTIFICATION AND POSTING

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF SISKIYOU) SS

CITY OF YREKA )
6

Page 7 of 7 ends

I, Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk for the City of Yreka, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that a copy of the above Agenda of the Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Yreka, California, was delivered and/or notice by email not less than 72 hours, before the hour of 5:30 p.m. on December 20, 2022 to the members of the governing agency, and caused the agenda to be posted on the City’s website at www.ci.yreka.ca.us and posted at Yreka City Hall, 701 Fourth St., Yreka, California. /s/: Rhetta Hogan
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

Page 1 of 7 ends

MINUTES OF THE YREKA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
HELD ON DECEMBER 6, 2022
Yreka City Council Chamber, 701 Fourth Street, Yreka, CA On December 6, 2022, the City Council of Yreka, met for a Special meeting at 5:30 p.m. and Regular Meeting at 6:30 p.m. and upon roll call, the following Councilmembers were present: Deborah Baird, Joan Smith Freeman (arrived 5:41pm), Duane Kegg, Paul McCoy, and Corey Middleton.

1. CALL TO ORDER:

2. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION:

None

3. CLOSED SESSION:

The City Council will recess to Closed Session to discuss the following item(s). At the conclusion of the Closed Session, Open Session will reconvene and reportable action, if any, will be announced:
a. Conference with Real Property Negotiations (§ 54956.8) Property: APN 062-031-250 (0.88-acre parcel)
Third Party Negotiation: Nor-Cal Products by Pfeiffer Vacuum City Negotiation: City Manager and City Attorney
Negotiating Parties: City of Yreka and Nor-Cal Products by Pfeiffer Vacuum Under Negotiation: Possible purchase agreement including price, terms of payment, or both.
b. Conference with Labor Negotiator Government Code § 54957.6(a) Agency negotiators: City Manager Ledbetter, Assistant City Manager Hogan, Human Resources Director Elsnab
Employee Organization: Yreka Management Association

4. OPTIONAL RECESS IF DESIRED:

5. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 6:30 PM:

Announcement of any action taken by the City Council in Closed Session required by the Ralph M. Brown Act. (Government Code § 54950 et. seq.)
Mayor Kegg announced that there was no reportable action taken during closed session

6. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

7. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND/OR ANNOUNCEMENTS:

This time slot is for informational presentations, appointments, or awards to be presented by the City Council or to the City Council.
29

Page 2 of 7 ends

8. PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Public comments period is not intended to be a “Question and Answer” period or conversations with the Council or City staff.

Public Comment from: Brian Favero, Sharon Farhney (530-340-1045), Steve Radford

9. PUBLIC COMMENT FOLLOW-UP:

This is the time for City Council or the City Manager to respond to public comments and may direct staff to prepare a report or place an item on a future agenda.

10. CONSENT AGENDA:

Recommended City Council Action (after the Mayor’s request for public comment): Motion to Adopt the Consent Agenda of the City Council of the City of Yreka as presented.

No Public Comment.

Motion to Adopt the Consent Agenda of the City Council of the City of Yreka as presented.

MOTIONED: Councilmember McCoy
SECONDED: Councilmember Middleton
AYES: Councilmembers: Baird, Smith Freeman, Kegg McCoy, and Middleton NOES: None
ABSENT: None
30

Page 3 of 7 ends

11. OLD BUSINESS
Yreka City Council, Mayor Kegg
a. Council Action: The City Council is being asked to make recommendations for a Mayoral appointment to two seats on the Planning Commission
The applicants that are being considered are:
• Dawnmarie Autry
• Louise Gliatto
• Ann Ohlund
• Marlee Billingsley
Recommended City Council Action: That the City Council make recommendations to the Mayor for a Mayoral appointment to fill two seats on the Planning Commission.

No Public Comment.

McCoy nominated: Autry and Ohlund, Middleton nominated: Ohlund and Billingsley, Joan Smith Freeman nominated: Ohlund and Billingsley; Baird: Ohlund and Gliatto, Kegg nominated: Ohlund and Billingsley City Manager tallied nominations 5 for Ann Ohlund, 3 for Marlee Billingsley. Mayor appointed Ohlund and Billingsley to the Planning Commission. Planning Commissioners will be sworn in at the next regular City Council meeting.

Human Resources Director
b. Approval of the Yreka Peace Officers’ Association (YPOA) Memorandum of Understanding Representatives for the City and YPOA have met and agreed upon compensation over the next thirty months for wages, benefits (including healthcare coverage) and other compensation (callback minimum, certificate pay, premium pay, and deferred compensation).

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopt a Resolution 2022-52 of the City Council of the City of Yreka approving execution of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Yreka and the Yreka Peace Officers’ Association.

No Public Comment.

Motion to Adopt a Resolution 2022-52 of the City Council of the City of Yreka approving execution of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Yreka and the Yreka Peace Officers’ Association.

MOTIONED: Councilmember Smith Freeman
SECONDED: Councilmember Baird
AYES: Councilmembers Baird, Smith Freeman, Kegg McCoy, and Middleton NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Finance
c. Agenda Title: Fee waiver request of Development Impact Fees for owner’s investment property 31

Page 4 of 7 ends

Owner/investor willingly entered into a fee waiver agreement in April 2017, secured by real property that is delinquent and is now subject to current development fee rates, interest and penalties. Owner is seeking payment relief.

Recommended City Council Action: Discussion and possible action regarding Waiver of Development Impact Fees for Mr. and Mrs. Schmidt investment property.

Public Comment: (Jason Ledbetter read into the public comment letter by) Bryan Foster, and in attendance Brian Young, Daniel Simon, Sherry Bennett, Lenita Ramos, Gage Kimball, Jerry Stacher, Tasha who works looks with Lenita, , Rico Gutierrez
Motion to temporarily forgo further fees accumulating on the property until June 1, if escrow did not close and city was not paid $22K by June 1, then previous forbearance penalties would be reimposed and assessed against the property. Motion failed for lack of second.

Motion where the City Attorney is being directed to redraft agreement to temporarily abate interest and penalties and to allow Certificate of Occupancy so long as the as the Certificate of Occupancy is issued and escrow closes by June 6, 2023 if the debtor fails to perform timely, interest and penalties, temporarily abated will be reimposed and applied to the note.

MOTIONED: Councilmember Kegg
SECONDED: Councilmember Middleton
AYES: Councilmembers Baird, Smith Freeman, Kegg McCoy, and Middleton NOES: None
ABSENT: None

12. PUBLIC HEARINGS:

Planning Director
a. Agenda Title: Whipple Tentative Parcel Map: Public Hearing The City of Yreka received an application from Todd and Stacy Whipple to divide Assessor’s Parcel Number 053-711-100 into two new parcels with a remainder. The two proposed parcels are immediately adjacent to the public right-of-way (North View Drive) in the northwest corner of City Limits. There are no proposed changes to the General Plan Designation of Low Density Residential or the Low Density Residentials (R-1) Zoning designation. The applicant proposes to construct two single-family houses on Parcel 1 & Parcel 2.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to approve City Council Resolution 2022-53 recommending approval of the proposed tentative parcel map number 2022-28 for City Council consideration and adopting a Class 15 categorical exemption from CEQA. 32

Page 5 of 7 ends

Public comment: Kris McCullough,
Motion to approve City Council Resolution 2022-53 recommending approval of the tentative parcel map number 2022-28 for City Council consideration and adopting a Class 15 categorical exemption from CEQA.

MOTIONED: Councilmember Smith Freeman
SECONDED: Councilmember Baird
AYES: Councilmembers Baird, Smith Freeman, Kegg McCoy, and Middleton NOES: None
ABSENT: None

13. NEW BUSINESS:

City Council Transition
a. Recognition of Outgoing Councilmembers: Recognition of Outgoing Councilmembers (Councilmember Smith Freeman and Mayor Pro Tempore Baird) by other Councilmembers:
i. Presentation of Plaques to outgoing Councilmembers by City Manager Ledbetter. ii. Remarks by outgoing Councilmembers Mayor Pro Tempore Baird, Councilmember Smith Freeman. iii. Public comment
b. Special Recognition for former Councilmember Norm Shaskey, term expired Nov. 2020 Outgoing Councilmembers leave the dais and mingle.

Meeting Break – transition for photo opportunity and reception. c. Swearing in Councilmember: Swearing in of incoming Councilmembers Colleen Baker, Drake J.

Davis, and Paul Edward McCoy by City Clerk Hogan
i. Presentation of certificates of Election to newly elected Councilmembers. ii. Incoming Councilmembers take a seat at the dais (occupying the seats of those who left) iii. Remarks by incoming Councilmembers Colleen Baker, Drake J. Davis, and Paul Edward McCoy. iv. Public Comments
d. Mayoral Selection: Mayor of Yreka Selection
Process: Mayor Kegg hands the gavel to Mr. Ledbetter, City Manager who will run this portion of the meeting.

City Manager Ledbetter opens the floor for nominations. • Nominations do not require a second.
• Even upon the receipt of one nomination additional nominations can be made. • Please note any Councilmember can nominate themselves. • Multiple nominations are acceptable and will be voted in the order they were received.

City Manager Ledbetter closes the floor for nominations for the position of Mayor of Yreka.

City Manager asks for the Council to vote (by roll call) on each nomination in the order received. The first nominee to receive a majority vote will be the new Mayor of Yreka for a two-year term.

Based on the Council vote the new Mayor of Yreka is announced. The Mayor of Yreka takes a seat centerstage at the dais.
33

Page 6 of 7 ends

City Manager Ledbetter hands the gavel to the Mayor and he/she will run the selection of the Yreka Mayor Pro Tempore.

Nominations for Mayor were received by City Manager Jason Ledbetter. Drake Davis nominated Colleen Baker. Colleen Baker nominated Corey Middleton.

Colleen Baker as nominee for Mayor: Roll call vote, Baker yes, Davis yes, McCoy no, Middleton no, Kegg no.

Corey Middleton as nominee for Mayor: Roll call Davis no, Kegg yes, McCoy yes, Middleton yes, Baker yes. e. Mayor Pro Tempore of Yreka Selection -
Process: Selected Mayor opens the floor for nominations. • Mayor takes nominations in the order they are received. • Nominations do not require a second.
• Even upon the receipt of one nomination additional nominations can be made. • Please note any Councilmember can nominate themselves. • Multiple nominations are acceptable and will be voted in the order they were received.

Mayor closes the floor for nominations for the position of Mayor Pro Tempore of Yreka.

Mayor asks for the Council vote (by roll call) on each nomination in the order received. The first nominee to receive a majority vote will be the new Mayor Pro Tempore of Yreka for a two-year term.

Mayor Pro Tempore nominations; Councilmember Kegg for Paul McCoy, Middleton nominated Colleen Baker.

Roll call vote for Paul McCoy: Davis yes, Baker no, Middleton no, Kegg yes, McCoy yes (Majority vote, no action was taken for the second nominee Ms. Colleen Baker).

Based on the Council vote the new Mayor Pro Tempore of Yreka is announced. The Mayor Pro Tempore takes a seat to the right of the Mayor at the dais.

The incoming Mayor Pro Tempore and Mayor may make additional remarks.

Return to New Business matters.

City Manager
f. Agenda Title: Calendar of 2023 City Council Meetings Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Approve Resolution 2022-54 Approving the 2023 City Council Meeting schedule.

Public Comment: None
Motion to Approve Resolution 2022-54 Approving the 2023 City Council Meeting schedule.

MOTIONED: Councilmember Kegg
SECONDED: Councilmember Baker
AYES: Councilmembers Davis, Baker, Kegg, McCoy, Middleton NOES: None
ABSENT: None

Page 7 of 7 ends

15. CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS:

City Manager and Staff may make brief announcements or reports at this time.

City Manager updated City Council on the warming center.

16. COUNCILMEMBER STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS:

Members of the Council may make brief announcements, reports, or request staff to report to Council on any matter at a subsequent meeting.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no more business the City Council meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m.

____________________
Corey Middleton, Mayor
Minutes approved by City Council,
Motion December 20, 2022
______________________
Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk
35

Page 1 of 1 ends

YREKA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
December 13, 2022 - Special Session:9:00 AM
Police Emergency Operations Center 1400 Fairlane Rd, Yreka, CA 96097 On December 13, 2022 the City Council held a special meeting at 9:00 a.m. at the Police Emergency Operations Center with the following Councilmembers present: Colleen Baker, Drake J. Davis, Duane Kegg, Paul Edward McCoy and Mayor Corey Middleton.

1. CALL TO ORDER SPECIAL SESSION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

Mayor Middleton called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.

Chief Gilman provided a welcome to the City Council.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS:

There was no public comment.

3. CITY COUNCIL ORIENTATION
Executive staff shared with the City Council pertinent details related to role and responsibilities of elected officials as well as legal requirements associated with the Office of the City Council.

There was no Council action at this special meeting.

4. ADJOURNMENT:

There being no more business the Special City Council meeting adjourned at 11:59 a.m.

____________________
Corey Middleton, Mayor
Minutes approved by City Council,
Motion December 20, 2022
______________________
Rhetta Hogan,
City Clerk
36 37
38 39

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
TO: Yreka City Council
FROM:

PREPARED BY:

Jason Ledbetter, City Manager
Emily Aldrich, Finance Director
AGENDA TITLE: Discussion and Possible Action: Motion to Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka
Authorizing Named Delegates to Access Confidential Sales, Use and Transaction Tax Data with HdL Companies
MEETING DATE: December 20, 2022
Discussion:

City of Yreka contracts with HdL Companies for Sales, Use and Transaction Tax management, analytics and auditing services.

Sales, use and transaction tax allocation data is confidential and protected by law, and HdL companies requires a resolution authorizing employee, as the City’s delegates, to access the confidential data.

The attached resolution names the Emily Aldrich, as the City of Yreka Finance and Rhetta Hogan, as Assistant City Manager as authorized users access the City’s sales, use and transaction data.

Fiscal Impact:

None
Recommendation and Requested Action:

Discussion and Possible Action: Motion to Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka Authorizing Named Delegates to Access Confidential Sales, Use and Transaction Tax Data with HdL Companies.

Approved by: __________________________________
Jason Ledbetter, City Manager
40 City of Yreka Phone 530-841-2386
701 Fourth Street, Yreka, CA 96097 Facsimile 530-842-4836 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-55

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA

AUTHORIZING NAMED DELEGATES TO ACCESS CONFIDIENTIAL

SALES, USE AND TRANSACTION TAX DATA

WITH HDL COMPANIES
WHEREAS, the City of Yreka contracts with HdL Companies for Sales, Use and Transaction Tax management, analytics and auditing services.; and WHEREAS, the City of Yreka sales, use and transaction tax allocation data is confidential and protected by law.; and
WHERAS, Emily Aldrich, as Finance Director of the City of Yreka, is to be granted full access to allocation data as afforded on the HDL Companies sales tax database platform, including but not limited to permissions for modifying geos, exporting reports and viewing confidential data.; and
WHEREAS, Rhetta Hogan, Assistant City Manager, an existing confidential delegate, remains as an authorized delegate.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Yreka hereby authorizes the above-named employees as users authorized to have access to the City’s sales, use and transaction tax allocation data.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until rescinded by City Council by resolution and a copy of the resolution rescinding this resolution is filed with the State Treasurer’s Office.

Passed and adopted, by the City Council of the City of Yreka, located in Siskiyou County of the State of California on 20th day of December 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________
Corey Middleton
Mayor
Attest:________________
City Clerk
41 Fund Type Fund Fund Description Previous Balance Receipts / Debits Disbursements /
Credits
Cash Balance by
Fund
General-Unrestricted 01 General Operating $ 8,852,538.40 $ 1,104,457.44 $ 2,895,099.94 $ 7,061,895.90 General-Designated 01 General Oper. - Other - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Comm Art - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Fire Museum 3,322.35 - - 3,322.35 General-Designated 01 Planning Deposits - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Sidewalk in Lieu 39,278.46 - - 39,278.46 General-Designated 01 Parkland Trust 300.00 - - 300.00
General-Designated 01 Police Asset Forfeit 11,479.83 760.03 - 12,239.86 General-Designated 01 Parking Fees - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Campbell Tract Redemption - - - 0.00 General-Designated 02 Gifts Donations 21,046.86 7,264.62 7,000.00 21,311.48 General-Designated 02 K-9 Unit - - - 0.00
General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Hitson 4,564.44 116.50 116.50 4,564.44 General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Travellers 741.68 - - 741.68 General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Teen Fund 3,956.43 - - 3,956.43 General-Designated 03 YVFD Volunter Fund 88,752.38 3,048.73 91,801.11 (0.00) General-Restricted 04 Crandell Cash 438,128.56 1,700.64 1,700.64 438,128.56 General-Restricted 05 Property Abatement Recovery 92,627.03 - 34,080.54 58,546.49 General-Designated 08 Grant Projects Reserve 1,277,347.34 48,537.00 43,896.78 1,281,987.56 General-Designated 08 PERS Pension Liability Reserve - - - 0.00 General-Designated 09 Reserves for Cap. Outlay 594,801.62 236,324.00 - 831,125.62 General-Designated 10 Capital Outlay 204,481.00 288,931.60 295,361.60 198,051.00 General-Designated 11 Capital Building Project - YPD (0.00) - 112.74 (112.74) General - All General-Designated 12 Debt Servicing - GF (YPD Bldg) 228,229.28 94,843.86 - 323,073.14 General-Designated 12 Debt Servicing Reserves - GF (YPD Bldg) 200,000.00 - - 200,000.00 General-Designated 90 Payroll Clearing (209,771.97) 1,122,340.96 513,234.70 399,334.29 10,877,744.52 $ Spec. Rev. -Streets 20 Road and Street Funds including HUTA 799,439.89 115,368.86 306,917.01 607,891.74 Spec. Rev. -Streets 21 Local Transportation 314,376.08 295,294.32 235,294.32 374,376.08 Streets Spec. Rev. -Streets 24 Fines - Traffic Safety 243,168.43 2,644.57 39,018.22 206,794.78 1,189,062.60 $ Special Revenue 30 Fire Assessment Spec. Rev 1,013,810.05 29,554.27 11,544.42 1,031,819.90 Special Revenue 31 Landfill Access Fee - Debt Service 12,496.83 19,678.39 1,698.12 30,477.10 Special Revenues Special Revenue 32 Developer Impact Fees 521,040.59 2,014.44 304,161.65 218,893.38 $ 1,281,190.38 Special Grants 60 Spec Grants Capital Outlay (64,227.81) 1,838,148.57 54,359.47 1,719,561.29 Special Grants Special Grants 65 Community Development Grants 916,843.66 14,593.16 12,522.98 918,913.84 SpecialOperating 67 SUMIT Operating 702,929.95 - - 702,929.95 $ 3,341,405.08 Water Enterprise 70 Water Operating 984,278.87 250,056.90 1,224,541.19 9,794.58 Water Enterprise 71 Water Capital Projects (1,452,157.09) 3,512,375.95 1,353,104.73 707,114.13 Water Enterprise 72 Water Debt Servicing 574,638.64 160,755.74 7,444.34 727,950.04 Water Enterprise 72 USDA COPS 2010 300,000.00 - - 300,000.00 Water Enterprise Water Enterprise 74 Water Reserves 7,721,528.43 705,514.70 3,457,629.55 4,969,413.58 $ 6,714,272.33 Sewer Enterprise 80 Sewer Operating 597,558.53 318,366.74 488,003.34 427,921.93 Sewer Enterprise 81 Sewer Capital Outlay (116,895.42) 1,661,184.90 1,056,394.12 487,895.36 Sewer Enterprise 82 Sewer Debt Servicing 524,832.80 1,315,276.89 1,703,774.79 136,334.90 Sewer Enterprise 82 USDA COPS 2003 250,000.00 - - 250,000.00 Enterprise-Sewer Sewer Enterprise 84 Sewer Reserves 4,965,505.47 83,811.94 376,662.28 4,672,655.13 $ 5,974,807.32 Agency
Agency 92 Agency SUMIT - Cash 19,218.53 0.48 - 19,219.01 $ 19,219.01 COLUMN TOTALS $ 30,680,210.12 $ 13,232,966.20 $ 14,515,475.08 $ 29,397,701.24 $ 29,397,701.24 -
BANK RECAPITULATION PER BANK Market Value Unrealized Gain PER LEDGER L.A.I.F. 0.861% 23,965,560.39 23,657,013.72 (308,546.67) Pershing Bank - CD & Treas Investments 2,697,000.00 2,664,623.73 (32,376.27) Pershing Bank - Cash 8,667.77
Petty Cash Drawers 1,200.00
YVFD Petty Cash -
Banner Bank (DDA for Bank Anticipation Not 1,347.22
MB SUMIT Operating x2233 705,233.99
MB SUMIT Asset Forfeiture X4281 19,219.01
Mechanics Bank - 01015102 1,968,266.74
TOTAL PER BANK 29,366,495.12

ADJUSTMENTS
Less Outstanding Checks MB (197,117.38)
Less Outstanding Checks SVB SUMIT (2,304.04)
Interest CR (GL ) June 2022 (14.37)
Transfer 6/29 - Posted 7/1 at Bank 1,452.32
Transfer 6/30 - Posted 7/5 at Bank 3,703.30
YVFD Payable -
Property Sale 234,300.00
MS ER Prem Corr 1,823.20
MS Admin Fee Correction 4.56
Retireee Fee Correction 3.51
Retireee Admin Fee Correction (2.70)
Health Rounding (0.04)
BRMS No Surprises Fee 42.50
BRMS Fee Correction 6.15
VSP 26.90
AR Invoice Correction (50.00)
Reconciling diff (0.02)
Cash in Transit - MBSC Interest (3,234.00)
Cash in Transit - MBSC Interest (5,785.34)
MBSC Interest (1,648.43)
TOTAL PER LEDGER 29,397,701.24 29,397,701.24
(0.00)
Corey Middleton, City Mayor
Emily Aldrich, Finance Director

CITY OF YREKA

REPORT ON CASH TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Jun-2022
42 Settlement Account Par Book Market Interest Maturity Market Date Investment Number Amount Value Value Rate % Date Value % Certificates of DepositVarious Multi-Bank Securities, Inc - PERSHING BANK *** RMB-034398 2,697,000.00 2,697,000.00 2,664,623.73 2.019% 0-5 years 98.80%Cash and Equivalents 6/30/2022 Local Agency Investment Fund - LAIF *** 98-47-996 23,965,560.39 23,965,560.39 23,657,013.72 0.861% NONE 98.71% 6/30/2022 Multi-Bank Securities, Inc - PERSHING BANK *** - Cash RMB-034398 8,667.77 8,667.77 8,667.77 0.000% NONE N/A 6/30/2022 Mechanics Bank- Checking xxxxxxx5102 1,968,266.74 1,968,266.74 1,968,266.74 0.010% NONE 100.00% 6/30/2022 Mechanics Bank-ZBA Credit Card Payments xxxxxxx6830 - - - 0.000% NONE N/A 6/30/2022 Mechanics Bank-SUMIT Non Adjudicated xxxxxxx4281 19,219.01 19,219.01 19,219.01 0.010% 100.00% 6/30/2022 Mechanics Bank-SUMIT Operating xxxxxxx2233 705,233.99 705,233.99 705,233.99 0.000% NONE 100.00% 6/30/2022 Banner Bank (DDA Bank Anticipation Note) xxxxxxx5733 1,347.22 1,347.22 1,347.22 0.020% NONE 100.00% 6/30/2022 Petty Cash - City Departments 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 NONE 100.00% TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS 29,366,495.12 $ 29,366,495.12 $ 29,025,572.18 $ *** See supplemental data on Multi Bank Securities and LAIF Investment maturities, investment portfolio mix and yield Emily Aldrich, Finance Director
Approved by motion of the Yreka City Council at its meeting held December 20, 2022Corey Middleton, Mayor Rhetta Hogan, Elected City Treasurer

QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT
June 30, 2022
The instruments of investments used this quarter are in direct relationship with the City's investment policy. It is the opinion of the Finance Diretor and CityTreasurer that the next six (6) months expenditures will be met. 43 2021-2022 Operating Budget of Revenue and Expenditures with Year to Date Actual Results June 30, 2022
Fund AnalysisMajor Grp Fund Adopted Operating Budget Year to Date 3 Adopted Operating Budget Year to Date 4 Operating Budget Net Actual
Year to Date
Beginning Working
Capital
Net Actuals
Increase /
(Decrease)
Ending Working
Capital
Current Cash
Balance
Investment in LAIF 00 - - - - - - - - - -
General Operating 01 7,185,170.84 7,765,774.66 9,206,875.27 7,728,737.91 9,901,561.58 9,546,332.21 (339,456.94) (2,135,786.92) (2,135,786.92) 7,703,268.40 5,567,481.48 7,117,036.57 General Operating Fund 7,185,170.84 7,765,774.66 9,206,875.27 7,728,737.91 9,901,561.58 9,546,332.21 (2,135,786.92) (339,456.94) 7,703,268.40 (2,135,786.92) 5,567,481.48 7,117,036.57 Gifts Donations 02 - 6,500.00 (6,195.28) 700.00 7,200.00 7,404.44 (700.00) (13,599.72) 41,295.21 (700.00) 40,595.21 30,574.03 YVFD Volunter Fund 03 13,500.00 13,500.00 16,115.78 13,500.00 109,324.24 100,367.26 (95,824.24) (84,251.48) 84,776.05 (95,824.24) (11,048.19) - Trusts -Crandell-Stewart 04 - - 2,342.84 2,050.00 32,344.00 7,445.03 (32,344.00) (5,102.19) 445,339.11 (32,344.00) 412,995.11 438,128.56 Property Abatement 05 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 50,000.00 41,453.51 50,000.00 58,546.49 - 58,546.49 58,546.49 58,546.49 General Fund Reserves 08 - - 99,650.00 - (75,103.22) - 174,753.22 - 1,168,692.34 - 1,168,692.34 1,281,987.56 Reserves for Cap. Outlay 09 - 309,071.88 - - - - 309,071.88 - 522,053.74 - 522,053.74 831,125.62 Capital Outlay 10 100,000.00 334,300.00 201,974.81 100,000.00 232,920.00 186,280.57 101,380.00 15,694.24 240,615.90 101,380.00 341,995.90 198,051.00 Construction Fund 11 - - - - - 112.74 - (112.74) - - - (112.74) General Fund Debt Servicing 12 126,085.00 126,085.00 220,928.86 126,085.00 126,529.81 126,529.81 (444.81) 94,399.05 405,652.84 (444.81) 405,208.03 523,073.14 Payroll Clearing 90 (181,902.04) (181,902.04) 15,435.71 - - - (181,902.04) 15,435.71 (181,902.04) - (181,902.04) 399,334.29 General Fund - Restricted or Designated 157,682.96 398,482.96 959,324.60 342,335.00 558,318.05 394,490.14 (159,835.09) 564,834.46 2,908,425.19 (151,288.60) 2,757,136.59 3,760,707.95 Total General Fund 7,342,853.80 8,164,257.62 10,166,199.87 8,071,072.91 10,459,879.63 9,940,822.35 (2,295,622.01) 225,377.52 10,611,693.59 (2,287,075.52) 8,324,618.07 10,877,744.52 Gas Tax & Traffic Cong. 20 909,518.63 909,518.63 911,157.27 909,518.67 1,004,785.67 905,710.43 (95,267.04) 5,446.84 259,605.47 (95,267.04) 164,338.43 607,891.74 Local Transportation 21 200,000.00 200,000.00 199,979.55 200,000.00 200,000.00 198,238.00 - 1,741.55 373,785.19 - 373,785.19 374,376.08 Fines - Traffic Safety 24 67,761.70 67,761.70 66,805.25 67,761.73 67,761.73 87,150.04 (0.03) (20,344.79) 227,454.72 (0.03) 227,454.69 206,794.78 Road, Street & Transit - Restricted 1,177,280.33 1,177,280.33 1,177,942.07 1,177,280.40 1,272,547.40 1,191,098.47 (95,267.07) (13,156.40) 860,845.38 (95,267.07) 765,578.31 1,189,062.60 Total Road, Streets and Transit 1,177,280.33 1,177,280.33 1,177,942.07 1,177,280.40 1,272,547.40 1,191,098.47 (95,267.07) (13,156.40) 860,845.38 (95,267.07) 765,578.31 1,189,062.60 Fire Assessment Spec. Rev 30 292,500.00 292,500.00 311,755.30 105,726.18 145,226.18 134,231.84 147,273.82 177,523.46 880,425.67 147,273.82 1,027,699.49 1,031,819.90Landfill Access Fee - Debt Service 31 240,000.00 240,000.00 240,413.04 240,000.01 631,324.13 631,237.16 (391,324.13) (390,824.12) 390,824.12 (391,324.13) (500.01) 30,477.10 Developer Impact Fees 32 16,000.00 16,000.00 442,172.03 9,500.00 302,147.21 302,147.21 (286,147.21) 140,024.82 79,652.80 (286,147.21) (206,494.41) 218,893.38 Special Revenue - Restricted 548,500.00 548,500.00 994,340.37 355,226.19 1,078,697.52 1,067,616.21 (530,197.52) (73,275.84) 1,350,902.59 (530,197.52) 820,705.07 1,281,190.38Total Special Revenue 548,500.00 548,500.00 994,340.37 355,226.19 1,078,697.52 1,067,616.21 (530,197.52) (73,275.84) 1,350,902.59 (530,197.52) 820,705.07 1,281,190.38Spec Grants Capital Outlay 60 1,964,000.00 1,964,000.00 2,224,366.18 1,964,000.00 1,964,000.00 368,096.45 1,856,269.73 - 191,456.53 - 191,456.53 1,719,561.29 Community Development Grants 65 600.00 600.00 8,555.40 580,750.00 806,100.00 19,748.11 (805,500.00) (11,192.71) 1,101,488.20 (805,500.00) 295,988.20 918,913.84 SUMIT Operating Fund 67 - - - - - - - - 702,929.95 600.00 703,529.95 702,929.95 Special Grants - Capital Projects 1,964,600.00 1,964,600.00 2,232,921.58 2,544,750.00 2,770,100.00 387,844.56 (805,500.00) 1,845,077.02 1,995,874.68 (804,900.00) 1,190,974.68 3,341,405.08 Special Grants - Operating & Capital Projects 1,964,600.00 1,964,600.00 2,232,921.58 2,544,750.00 2,770,100.00 387,844.56 (805,500.00) 1,845,077.02 1,995,874.68 (804,900.00) 1,190,974.68 3,341,405.08 Water Operating 70 - - - 2,531,452.98 2,531,452.98 2,382,248.20 (2,382,248.20) (2,531,452.98) (2,531,452.98) 98,107.50 (2,433,345.48) 9,794.58 Water Capital Projects 71 2,531,452.97 2,531,452.97 1,492,529.45 5,922,452.00 6,122,452.00 682,362.67 810,166.78 (3,590,999.03) (3,590,999.03) 456,800.54 (3,134,198.49) 707,114.13Water Debt Servicing 72 5,922,452.00 6,122,452.00 4,173,906.49 349,331.92 349,331.92 132,240.11 4,041,666.38 5,773,120.08 5,773,120.08 1,015,352.43 6,788,472.51 1,027,950.04 Water Reserves 74 356,831.92 356,831.92 509,830.98 - - - 509,830.98 356,831.92 356,831.92 7,336,431.96 7,693,263.88 4,969,413.58 Water Enterprise 8,810,736.89 9,010,736.89 6,176,266.92 8,803,236.90 9,003,236.90 3,196,850.98 7,499.99 2,979,415.94 8,906,692.43 7,499.99 8,914,192.42 6,714,272.33 Sewer Operating 80 (127,177.89) (127,177.89) (2,507,036.78) 2,430,980.31 2,430,980.31 2,110,549.19 (2,558,158.20) (4,617,585.97) 386,294.06 (2,558,158.20) (2,171,864.14) 427,921.93 Sewer Capital Outlay 81 2,430,980.29 2,430,980.29 1,891,209.82 3,768,621.00 3,937,091.00 594,140.43 (1,506,110.71) 1,297,069.39 252,725.58 (1,506,110.71) (1,253,385.13) 487,895.36 Sewer Debt Servicing 82 3,768,621.00 3,768,621.00 5,664,270.57 261,233.75 261,233.75 151,840.99 3,507,387.25 5,512,429.58 661,004.62 3,507,387.25 4,168,391.87 386,334.90 Sewer Reserves 84 263,233.75 263,233.75 (4,759,811.81) - - - 263,233.75 (4,759,811.81) 4,584,451.31 263,233.75 4,847,685.06 4,672,655.13 Sewer Enterprise Fund 6,335,657.15 6,335,657.15 288,631.80 6,460,835.06 6,629,305.06 2,856,530.61 (293,647.91) (2,567,898.81) 5,884,475.57 (293,647.91) 5,590,827.66 5,974,807.32 Total Enterprise Funds 15,146,394.04 15,346,394.04 6,464,898.72 15,264,071.96 15,632,541.96 6,053,381.59 (286,147.92) 411,517.13 14,791,168.00 (286,147.92) 14,505,020.08 12,689,079.65 SUMIT Agency Trust - Cash 92 - - - - - - - - - - - 19,219.01 Agency Funds - - - - - - - - - - - 19,219.01 \
Total Agency Funds - - - - - - - - - - - 19,219.01
All Funds Combined 27,201,031.99 26,179,628.17 21,036,302.61 27,412,401.46 31,213,766.51 18,640,763.18 (4,012,734.52) 2,395,539.43 29,610,484.24 (4,003,588.03) 25,606,896.21 29,397,701.24 Excess of Rev over Exp.-Surplus/ Based on Operating Budget R E V E N U E E X P E N S E (Deficit)
Approval:______________________________________________________Corey Middleton, Mayor 12/15/2022 9:32 AM 44 City of Yreka Financial Statement Groupings
Summary FY 21-22 YTD Fiscal Performance
as of June 30, 2022
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt

1. GENERAL FUNDSRevenue
801 REVENUE: PROP TAXES 1,158,650.00 1,158,650.00 1,268,794.59 110,144.59807 MVLF IN LIEU 650,000.00 691,566.46 41,566.46 650,000.00810 SALES TAX 3,500,000.00 4,294,849.55 794,849.55 3,500,000.00813 REVENUE: TOT TAXES 825,000.00 1,264,819.63 439,819.63 825,000.00814 REVENUE: FRANCHISE FEES 280,000.00 268,153.24 -11,846.76 280,000.00815 REVENUE - LICENSES AND PERMITS 187,900.00 275,499.37 87,599.37 187,900.00825 REVENUE - FINES & FORFEITURES 250.00 -6,449.78 -6,699.78 250.00830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 70,800.00 -87,556.39 -158,356.39 70,800.00850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 344,033.84 1,032,192.97 101,055.31 931,137.66870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 45,825.00 76,533.93 30,708.93 45,825.00880 ICA ALLOCATION 445,797.00 526,691.41 80,894.41 445,797.00882 REVENUE - OTHER 16,500.00 216,025.32 199,525.32 16,500.00883 GAIN (LOSS) ON SALE OF ASSETS 0.00 234,300.00 0.00 234,300.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 95,343.86 95,343.86 0.00

1. GENERAL FUNDS Revenue Totals 7,524,755.84 8,346,159.66 10,150,764.16 1,804,604.50Expense 100 MAYOR, COUNCIL, CITY MANAGER, CLERK 434,905.62 471,005.62 387,778.78 83,226.84110 EXP. GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1,017,347.28 1,194,780.79 190.16 1,194,970.95130 PUBLIC SAFETY CODE ENFORCEMENT 221,898.63 182,370.24 28.39 182,398.63 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 1 of 8
45 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
200 PUBLIC SAFETY - POLICE 3,733,037.46 3,735,037.46 3,622,212.15 112,825.31210 PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE 680,531.59 731,883.02 91,472.81 823,355.83220 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 550,430.19 575,611.98 15,612.21 591,224.19300 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING AND ADMIN 122,679.86 82,634.03 40,045.83 122,679.86350 PUBLIC WORKS - MECHANICAL MAINT (ELIM) 0.01 -0.70 0.71 0.01370 PUBLIC WORKS - SERVICE CENTER (ELIM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00400 CULTURAL & REC - PARKS AND REC 586,650.94 505,257.85 93,693.09 598,950.94645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 47,500.00 101,458.07 81,961.93 183,420.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 34,000.00 34,000.00 0.00 34,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 92,085.00 92,529.81 0.00 92,529.81760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 550,006.33 2,430,306.33 0.00 2,430,306.33

1. GENERAL FUNDS Expense Totals 8,071,072.91 10,459,879.63 9,940,822.35 519,057.281. GENERAL FUNDS Net Position Change -546,317.07 -2,113,719.97 209,941.81 2,323,661.78 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 2 of 8
46 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 1. GENERAL FUNDS (1047 detail records)2. STREETS FUNDSRevenue 825 REVENUE - FINES & FORFEITURES 15,000.00 15,000.00 13,806.20 -1,193.80830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3,500.00 6,627.62 3,127.62 3,500.00850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 608,774.00 550,568.03 -58,205.97 608,774.00882 REVENUE - OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00887 REVENUE: INKIND 0.00 10,933.89 10,933.89 0.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 550,006.33 550,006.33 596,006.33 46,000.00

2. STREETS FUNDS Revenue Totals 1,177,280.33 1,177,280.33 1,177,942.07 661.74Expense 300 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING AND ADMIN 61,337.08 61,337.08 49,753.84 11,583.24310 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET MAINTENANCE 437,940.94 546,471.34 61.36 546,532.70311 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET SWEEPING 82,558.52 59,166.94 1,391.58 60,558.52312 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET LIGHTING 56,044.98 56,499.28 -454.30 56,044.98313 PUBLIC WORKS - WEED CONTROL STREETS 10,995.72 4,154.78 6,840.94 10,995.72314 PUBLIC WORKS - PUBLIC PARKING LOTS 2,373.41 2,373.41 1,474.35 899.06320 PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC SAFETY 67,761.73 60,787.45 6,974.28 67,761.73340 TRANSPORTATION 200,000.00 198,238.00 1,762.00 200,000.00390 PUBLIC WORKS - STORM DRAINS 170,768.02 110,914.66 36,253.36 147,168.02645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 40,000.00 103,637.83 13,637.41 117,275.24740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 45,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 2,500.00

2. STREETS FUNDS Expense Totals 1,177,280.40 1,272,547.40 1,191,098.47 81,448.932. STREETS FUNDS Net Position Change -0.07 -95,267.07 -13,156.40 82,110.67 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 3 of 8
47 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 2. STREETS FUNDS (318 detail records)3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDSRevenue 811 OTHER TAXES 290,000.00 290,000.00 304,997.83 14,997.83815 REVENUE - LICENSES AND PERMITS 16,000.00 440,926.93 424,926.93 16,000.00830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2,500.00 6,367.82 3,867.82 2,500.00850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 0.00 210.15 210.15 0.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 240,000.00 240,308.63 308.63 240,000.00882 REVENUE - OTHER 0.00 0.00 1,529.01 1,529.01883 GAIN (LOSS) ON SALE OF ASSETS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00890 PROCEEDS FROM LT DEBT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Revenue Totals 548,500.00 548,500.00 994,340.37 445,840.37Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 65,000.01 456,324.13 456,237.16 86.97210 PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE 15,000.00 3,109.41 10,990.59 14,100.00645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 0.00 40,396.19 3.81 40,400.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 184,475.24 183,259.45 183,259.45 0.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 81,250.94 82,466.79 -0.06 82,466.73760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 9,500.00 302,147.21 0.00 302,147.21

3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Expense Totals 355,226.19 1,078,697.52 1,067,616.21 11,081.313. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Net Position Change 193,273.81 -530,197.52 -73,275.84 456,921.68 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 4 of 8
48 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (52 detail records)4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 600.00 600.00 8,555.40 7,955.40850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,964,000.00 390,066.18 -1,573,933.82 1,964,000.00883 GAIN (LOSS) ON SALE OF ASSETS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 1,834,300.00 1,834,300.00 0.00

4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Revenue Totals 1,964,600.00 1,964,600.00 2,232,921.58 268,321.58Expense 220 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 185,000.00 185,000.00 80,717.35 104,282.65300 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING AND ADMIN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00600 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 405,750.00 201,448.31 329,651.69 531,100.00645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,954,000.00 105,678.90 1,948,321.10 2,054,000.00

4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Expense Totals 2,544,750.00 2,770,100.00 387,844.56 2,382,255.444. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Net Position Change -580,150.00 -805,500.00 1,845,077.02 2,650,577.02 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 5 of 8
49 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS (212 detail records)5. WATER FUNDSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 85,000.00 85,000.00 -102,771.49 -187,771.49850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 5,635,000.00 484,798.52 -5,350,201.48 5,835,000.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 2,956,059.00 3,126,816.62 170,757.62 2,956,059.00882 REVENUE - OTHER 0.00 -369.25 -369.25 0.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 7,500.00 160,755.74 153,255.74 7,500.00

5. WATER FUNDS Revenue Totals 8,683,559.00 8,883,559.00 3,669,230.14 -5,214,328.86Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 249,793.38 249,793.38 262,230.46 -12,437.08300 ENGINEERING 249,394.98 205,112.79 44,282.19 249,394.98495 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE 0.00 682,362.67 -682,362.67 0.00500 WATER DISTRIBUTION EXPENSE 857,575.34 568,159.05 289,416.29 857,575.34510 WATER TREATMENT AND CONSERVATION 848,578.28 835,585.34 12,992.94 848,578.28510 COST OF POWER AND WATER 283,000.00 236,494.54 46,505.46 283,000.00645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 5,736,296.00 5,936,296.00 4,370,386.19 1,565,909.81690 CAPITALIZATION OF ASSETS 0.00 -4,370,386.19 4,370,386.19 0.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 216,835.13 0.00 216,835.13 216,835.13745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 132,496.79 132,240.11 256.68 132,496.79799 ICA EXPENSE 229,267.00 274,666.02 -45,399.02 229,267.00

5. WATER FUNDS Expense Totals 8,803,236.90 9,003,236.90 3,196,850.98 5,806,385.925. WATER FUNDS Net Position Change -119,677.90 -119,677.90 472,379.16 592,057.06 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 6 of 8
50 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 5. WATER FUNDS (305 detail records)6. SEWER FUNDSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 37,931.00 37,931.00 -69,073.31 -107,004.31850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 500,000.00 16,771.38 -483,228.62 500,000.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 2,741,002.00 2,816,858.61 75,856.61 2,741,002.00882 REVENUE - OTHER 3,000,000.00 0.00 -3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00883 GAIN (LOSS) ON SALE OF ASSETS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 2,000.00 2,000.00 46,547.61 44,547.61

6. SEWER FUNDS Revenue Totals 6,280,933.00 6,280,933.00 2,811,104.29 -3,469,828.71Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 238,793.38 238,793.38 244,452.93 -5,659.55300 ENGINEERING 227,394.98 195,674.01 31,720.97 227,394.98495 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE 0.00 594,140.43 -594,140.43 0.00510 COST OF POWER AND WATER 221,000.00 187,243.36 33,756.64 221,000.00550 WASTEWATER COLLECTION EXPENSE 682,189.51 368,680.16 313,509.35 682,189.51560 WASTEWATER TREATMENT EXPENSE 859,516.44 987,116.44 862,473.34 124,643.10645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 3,754,177.00 5,906,263.37 -2,111,216.37 3,795,047.00690 CAPITALIZATION OF ASSETS 0.00 -5,906,263.37 5,906,263.37 0.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 85,000.00 0.00 85,000.00 85,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 176,233.75 151,840.99 24,392.76 176,233.75799 ICA EXPENSE 216,530.00 252,025.39 -35,495.39 216,530.00

6. SEWER FUNDS Expense Totals 6,460,835.06 6,629,305.06 2,856,530.61 3,772,774.456. SEWER FUNDS Net Position Change -179,902.06 -348,372.06 -45,426.32 302,945.74 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 7 of 8
51 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 6. SEWER FUNDS (255 detail records) Grand Total 1,232,773.29 4,012,734.52 -2,395,539.43 -6,408,273.95 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 8 of 8
52 Fund Type Fund Fund Description Previous Balance
Receipts /
Debits
Disbursements /
Credits
Cash Balance by
Fund
General-Unrestricted 01 General Operating $ 7,061,895.90 $ 1,732,855.54 $ 582,757.37 $ 8,211,994.07 General-Designated 01 General Oper. - Other - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Comm Art - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Fire Museum 3,322.35 - - 3,322.35 General-Designated 01 Planning Deposits - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Sidewalk in Lieu 39,278.46 - - 39,278.46 General-Designated 01 Parkland Trust 300.00 - - 300.00
General-Designated 01 Police Asset Forfeit 12,239.86 - - 12,239.86 General-Designated 01 Parking Fees - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Campbell Tract Redemption - - - 0.00 General-Designated 02 Gifts Donations 21,311.48 10,000.00 2,917.35 28,394.13 General-Designated 02 K-9 Unit - - - 0.00
General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Hitson 4,564.44 60.15 - 4,624.59 General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Travellers 741.68 - - 741.68 General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Teen Fund 3,956.43 - - 3,956.43 General-Designated 03 YVFD Volunter Fund (0.00) - 418.06 (418.06) General-Restricted 04 Crandell Cash 438,128.56 820.68 - 438,949.24 General-Restricted 05 Property Abatement Recovery 58,546.49 - - 58,546.49 General-Designated 08 Grant Projects Reserve 1,281,987.56 - 1,281,987.56 - General-Designated 08 PERS Pension Liability Reserve - - - 0.00 General-Designated 09 Reserves for Cap. Outlay 831,125.62 - - 831,125.62 General-Designated 10 Capital Outlay 198,051.00 - - 198,051.00 General-Designated 11 Capital Building Project - YPD (112.74) - - (112.74) General - All General-Designated 12 Debt Servicing - GF (YPD Bldg) 323,073.14 - - 323,073.14 General-Designated 12 Debt Servicing Reserves - GF (YPD Bldg) 200,000.00 - - 200,000.00 General-Designated 90 Payroll Clearing 399,334.29 666,755.27 1,974,232.21 (908,142.65) 10,727,911.17 $ Spec. Rev. -Streets 20 Road and Street Funds including HUTA 607,891.74 39,799.95 129,043.80 518,647.89 Spec. Rev. -Streets 21 Local Transportation 374,376.08 586.56 - 374,962.64 Streets Spec. Rev. -Streets 24 Fines - Traffic Safety 206,794.78 2,255.09 663.66 208,386.21 1,101,996.74 $ Special Revenue 30 Fire Assessment Spec. Rev 1,031,819.90 26,652.37 120.61 1,058,351.66 Special Revenue 31 Landfill Access Fee - Debt Service 30,477.10 20,395.30 704.03 50,168.37 Special Revenues Special Revenue 32 Developer Impact Fees 218,893.38 784.24 - 219,677.62 $ 1,328,197.65 Special Grants 60 Spec Grants Capital Outlay 1,719,561.29 353.20 108,103.34 1,611,811.15 Special Grants Special Grants 65 Community Development Grants 918,913.84 2,560.27 371.77 921,102.34 SpecialOperating 67 SUMIT Operating 702,929.95 - - 702,929.95 $ 3,235,843.44 Water Enterprise 70 Water Operating 9,794.58 331,034.69 230,962.15 109,867.12 Water Enterprise 71 Water Capital Projects 707,114.13 1,999.56 1,091,951.68 (382,837.99) Water Enterprise 72 Water Debt Servicing 727,950.04 - 7,187.66 720,762.38 Water Enterprise 72 USDA COPS 2010 300,000.00 - - 300,000.00 Water Enterprise Water Enterprise 74 Water Reserves 4,969,413.58 85,407.30 5,054,820.88 - $ 5,802,612.39 Sewer Enterprise 80 Sewer Operating 427,921.93 249,556.49 193,187.51 484,290.91 Sewer Enterprise 81 Sewer Capital Outlay 487,895.36 330.71 449,149.07 39,077.00 Sewer Enterprise 82 Sewer Debt Servicing 136,334.90 410,627.30 88,241.22 458,720.98 Sewer Enterprise 82 USDA COPS 2003 250,000.00 - - 250,000.00 Enterprise-Sewer Sewer Enterprise 84 Sewer Reserves 4,672,655.13 71,240.95 4,743,896.08 - $ 5,975,984.97 Agency
Agency 92 Agency SUMIT - Cash 19,219.01 - - 19,219.01 $ 19,219.01 COLUMN TOTALS $ 29,397,701.24 $ 3,654,075.62 $ 4,860,011.49 $ 28,191,765.37 $ 28,191,765.37 -
BANK RECAPITULATION PER BANK Market Value Unrealized Gain PER LEDGER L.A.I.F. 0.861% 23,012,280.57 22,716,006.98 (296,273.59) Pershing Bank - CD & Treas Investments 2,697,000.00 2,661,442.69 (35,557.31) Pershing Bank - Cash 4,814.83
Petty Cash Drawers 1,200.00
YVFD Petty Cash -
Banner Bank (DDA for Bank Anticipation Note 1,348.16
MB SUMIT Operating x2233 705,233.99
MB SUMIT Asset Forfeiture X4281 19,219.01
Mechanics Bank - 01015102 1,991,000.71
TOTAL PER BANK 28,432,097.27

ADJUSTMENTS
Less Outstanding Checks MB (213,604.23)
Less Outstanding Checks SVB SUMIT (2,304.04)
Interest CR (GL ) July 2022 (12.46)
Transfer 7/29 - Posted 8/1 at Bank 2,919.92
Transfer 7/28 - Posted 8/1 at Bank 10,232.11
AR - Stage Rental Adjustment - need LP Adjus (250.00)
UBRI NSF 275.31
LP Adjustment (20.00)
Health Rounding (0.04)
BRMS No Surprises Fee 83.00
VSP (26.90)
CalPERS Health Admin Fee BP Rate Adj 47.43
CalPERS Health Admin Fee BP Rate Adj 6.10
AR - Correction -
PERS PR 7/29 Bank 8/02 (27,491.05)
SDU PR 7/29 Bank 8/03 (615.22)
Nationwide PR 7/29 GL 8/02 (4,757.00)
MBSC Transfer 7-21 (4,814.83)
28,191,765.37 28,191,765.37
(0.00)
Corey Middleton, City Mayor
Emily Aldrich, Finance Director

CITY OF YREKA

REPORT ON CASH TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Jul-2022
53 2022-2023 Operating Budget of Revenue and Expenditures with Year to Date Actual Results July 31, 2022
Fund AnalysisMajor Grp Fund Adopted Operating Budget Year to Date 3 Adopted Operating Budget Year to Date 4 Operating Budget Net Actual
Year to Date
Current Cash
Balance
Investment in LAIF 00 - - - - - - -
General Operating 01 7,474,244.57 7,923,861.07 594,759.43 7,854,692.39 7,854,692.39 366,765.52 227,993.91 69,168.68 8,267,134.74 General Operating Fund 7,474,244.57 7,923,861.07 594,759.43 7,854,692.39 7,854,692.39 366,765.52 69,168.68 227,993.91 8,267,134.74 Gifts Donations 02 - - 10,000.00 700.00 700.00 - (700.00) 10,000.00 37,716.83 YVFD Volunter Fund 03 13,500.00 13,500.00 - 13,500.00 13,500.00 - - - (418.06) Trusts -Crandell-Stewart 04 - - - 2,050.00 2,050.00 - (2,050.00) - 438,949.24 Property Abatement 05 - - - - - - - - 58,546.49
General Fund Reserves 08 - - - - - - - - 1,281,987.56
Reserves for Cap. Outlay 09 - - - - - - - - 831,125.62
Capital Outlay 10 82,500.00 82,500.00 - 82,500.00 82,500.00 (58,259.14) - 58,259.14 198,051.00 Construction Fund 11 - - - - - - - - (112.74)
General Fund Debt Servicing 12 125,895.00 125,895.00 - 125,895.00 125,895.00 (23,021.25) - 23,021.25 523,073.14 Payroll Clearing 90 - - - - - - - - (908,142.65)
General Fund - Restricted or Designated 221,895.00 221,895.00 10,000.00 224,645.00 224,645.00 (81,280.39) (2,750.00) 91,280.39 2,460,776.43 Total General Fund 7,696,139.57 8,145,756.07 604,759.43 8,079,337.39 8,079,337.39 285,485.13 66,418.68 319,274.30 10,727,911.17 Gas Tax & Traffic Cong. 20 954,702.40 954,702.40 40,520.12 954,702.44 954,702.44 55,311.00 (0.04) (14,790.88) 518,647.89 Local Transportation 21 200,000.00 200,000.00 - 200,000.00 200,000.00 - - - 374,962.64 Fines - Traffic Safety 24 68,164.14 68,164.14 1,694.64 68,164.14 68,164.14 535.37 - 1,159.27 208,386.21 Road, Street & Transit - Restricted 1,222,866.54 1,222,866.54 42,214.76 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 55,846.37 (0.04) (13,631.61) 1,101,996.74 Total Road, Streets and Transit 1,222,866.54 1,222,866.54 42,214.76 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 55,846.37 (0.04) (13,631.61) 1,101,996.74 Fire Assessment Spec. Rev 30 307,500.00 307,500.00 26,525.14 105,726.24 105,726.24 - 201,773.76 26,525.14 1,058,351.66Landfill Access Fee - Debt Service 31 240,000.00 240,000.00 20,099.55 240,000.01 240,000.01 528.56 (0.01) 19,570.99 50,168.37 Developer Impact Fees 32 16,000.00 16,000.00 - 9,500.00 9,500.00 - 6,500.00 - 219,677.62 Special Revenue - Restricted 563,500.00 563,500.00 46,624.69 355,226.25 355,226.25 528.56 208,273.75 46,096.13 1,328,197.65Total Special Revenue 563,500.00 563,500.00 46,624.69 355,226.25 355,226.25 528.56 208,273.75 46,096.13 1,328,197.65Spec Grants Capital Outlay 60 2,249,000.00 2,249,000.00 - 2,249,000.00 2,249,000.00 1,497.77 - (1,497.77) 1,611,811.15 Community Development Grants 65 750,600.00 750,600.00 98.84 800,750.00 800,750.00 (3,152.06) (50,150.00) 3,250.90 921,102.34 SUMIT Operating Fund 67 - - - - - - - - 702,929.95
Special Grants - Capital Projects 2,999,600.00 2,999,600.00 98.84 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 (1,654.29) (50,150.00) 1,753.13 3,235,843.44Special Grants - Operating & Capital Projects 2,999,600.00 2,999,600.00 98.84 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 (1,654.29) (50,150.00) 1,753.13 3,235,843.44 Water Operating 70 2,585,884.55 2,585,884.55 252,729.54 2,585,884.53 2,585,884.53 102,246.09 150,483.45 0.02 109,867.12 Water Capital Projects 71 2,853,117.00 7,873,117.00 (459,352.92) 2,853,117.00 7,873,117.00 8,188.49 (467,541.41) - (382,837.99) Water Debt Servicing 72 356,738.17 356,738.17 - 349,238.17 349,238.17 (93,771.09) 93,771.09 7,500.00 1,020,762.38 Water Reserves 74 (916,687.72) (1,197,687.72) (54,129.22) - - - (54,129.22) (1,197,687.72) 5,054,820.88 Water Enterprise 4,879,052.00 9,618,052.00 (260,752.60) 5,788,239.70 10,808,239.70 16,663.49 (1,190,187.70) (277,416.09) 5,802,612.39 Sewer Operating 80 2,360,449.98 2,360,449.98 180,266.31 2,360,449.97 2,360,449.97 91,964.12 0.01 88,302.19 484,290.91 Sewer Capital Outlay 81 9,326,680.00 9,326,680.00 - 9,326,680.00 9,518,080.00 930.00 (191,400.00) (930.00) 39,077.00 Sewer Debt Servicing 82 318,855.00 318,855.00 - 316,855.00 316,855.00 (1,168.75) 2,000.00 1,168.75 708,720.98 Sewer Reserves 84 (764,015.98) (764,015.98) (24,813.26) - 120,663.50 - (764,015.98) (145,476.76) 4,743,896.08 Sewer Enterprise Fund 11,241,969.00 11,241,969.00 155,453.05 12,003,984.97 12,195,384.97 212,388.87 (953,415.97) (56,935.82) 5,975,984.97 Total Enterprise Funds 16,121,021.00 20,860,021.00 (105,299.55) 17,792,224.67 23,003,624.67 229,052.36 (2,143,603.67) (334,351.91) 11,778,597.36 SUMIT Agency Trust - Cash 92 - - - - - - - - 19,219.01
Agency Funds - - - - - - - - 19,219.01 \
Total Agency Funds - - - - - - - - 19,219.01
All Funds Combined 33,791,743.61 28,603,127.11 588,398.17 30,499,404.89 35,710,804.89 569,258.13 (1,919,061.28) 19,140.04 28,191,765.37 Excess of Rev over Exp.-Surplus/
R E V E N U E E X P E N S E (Deficit)
Approval:______________________________________________________Corey Middleton, Mayor 12/15/2022 9:18 AM 54 City of Yreka Financial Statement Groupings
Summary FY 22-23 YTD Fiscal Performance
as of July 31, 2022
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt

1. GENERAL FUNDSRevenue
801 REVENUE: PROP TAXES 1,208,650.00 1,208,650.00 93,497.66 -1,115,152.34807 MVLF IN LIEU 650,000.00 0.00 -650,000.00 650,000.00810 SALES TAX 3,600,000.00 382,030.63 -3,217,969.37 3,600,000.00813 REVENUE: TOT TAXES 830,000.00 100,056.44 -729,943.56 830,000.00814 REVENUE: FRANCHISE FEES 285,000.00 46,019.14 -238,980.86 285,000.00815 REVENUE - LICENSES AND PERMITS 189,900.00 7,952.90 -181,947.10 189,900.00825 REVENUE - FINES & FORFEITURES 250.00 623.77 373.77 250.00830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 70,800.00 -131,319.95 -202,119.95 70,800.00850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 348,417.57 48,431.90 -749,602.17 798,034.07870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 50,825.00 4,060.29 -46,764.71 50,825.00880 ICA ALLOCATION 445,797.00 37,000.00 -408,797.00 445,797.00882 REVENUE - OTHER 16,500.00 16,406.65 -93.35 16,500.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1. GENERAL FUNDS Revenue Totals 7,696,139.57 8,145,756.07 604,759.43 -7,540,996.64Expense 100 MAYOR, COUNCIL, CITY MANAGER, CLERK 432,382.41 432,382.41 12,172.36 420,210.05110 EXP. GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1,000,856.81 165,505.41 835,351.40 1,000,856.81130 PUBLIC SAFETY CODE ENFORCEMENT 124,003.29 5,460.54 118,542.75 124,003.29200 PUBLIC SAFETY - POLICE 3,764,055.55 162,458.99 3,601,596.56 3,764,055.55 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 1 of 8
55 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
210 PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE 688,288.33 688,288.33 17,035.40 671,252.93220 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 556,999.77 22,446.55 534,553.22 556,999.77300 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING AND ADMIN 150,103.38 1,772.70 148,330.68 150,103.38350 PUBLIC WORKS - MECHANICAL MAINT (ELIM) 0.01 77,178.44 -77,178.43 0.01370 PUBLIC WORKS - SERVICE CENTER (ELIM) 0.00 430.62 -430.62 0.00400 CULTURAL & REC - PARKS AND REC 574,386.30 22,968.01 551,418.29 574,386.30645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 72,500.00 -58,259.14 130,759.14 72,500.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 35,000.00 0.00 35,000.00 35,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 90,895.00 -23,021.25 113,916.25 90,895.00760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 589,866.54 0.00 589,866.54 589,866.54

1. GENERAL FUNDS Expense Totals 8,079,337.39 8,079,337.39 406,148.63 7,673,188.761. GENERAL FUNDS Net Position Change -383,197.82 66,418.68 198,610.80 132,192.12 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 2 of 8
56 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 1. GENERAL FUNDS (848 detail records)2. STREETS FUNDSRevenue 825 REVENUE - FINES & FORFEITURES 15,000.00 15,000.00 1,694.64 -13,305.36830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3,500.00 0.00 -3,500.00 3,500.00850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 614,500.00 29,586.23 -584,913.77 614,500.00887 REVENUE: INKIND 0.00 10,933.89 10,933.89 0.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 589,866.54 0.00 -589,866.54 589,866.54

2. STREETS FUNDS Revenue Totals 1,222,866.54 1,222,866.54 42,214.76 -1,180,651.78Expense 300 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING AND ADMIN 62,542.43 62,542.43 2,664.70 59,877.73310 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET MAINTENANCE 430,564.36 48,302.69 382,261.67 430,564.36311 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET SWEEPING 85,522.92 693.81 84,829.11 85,522.92312 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET LIGHTING 56,144.97 2,175.43 53,969.54 56,144.97313 PUBLIC WORKS - WEED CONTROL STREETS 10,995.72 0.00 10,995.72 10,995.72314 PUBLIC WORKS - PUBLIC PARKING LOTS 2,373.41 0.00 2,373.41 2,373.41320 PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC SAFETY 68,164.14 68,164.14 535.37 67,628.77340 TRANSPORTATION 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 200,000.00390 PUBLIC WORKS - STORM DRAINS 171,558.63 1,474.37 170,084.26 171,558.63645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 40,000.00 0.00 40,000.00 40,000.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 90,000.00 0.00 90,000.00 90,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00

2. STREETS FUNDS Expense Totals 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 55,846.37 1,167,020.212. STREETS FUNDS Net Position Change -0.04 -0.04 -13,631.61 -13,631.57 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 3 of 8
57 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 2. STREETS FUNDS (244 detail records)3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDSRevenue 811 OTHER TAXES 305,000.00 305,000.00 26,525.14 -278,474.86815 REVENUE - LICENSES AND PERMITS 16,000.00 0.00 -16,000.00 16,000.00830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2,500.00 0.00 -2,500.00 2,500.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 240,000.00 20,099.55 -219,900.45 240,000.00

3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Revenue Totals 563,500.00 563,500.00 46,624.69 -516,875.31Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 65,000.01 65,000.01 528.56 64,471.45210 PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 15,000.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 185,708.43 0.00 185,708.43 185,708.43745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 80,017.81 0.00 80,017.81 80,017.81760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 9,500.00 0.00 9,500.00 9,500.00

3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Expense Totals 355,226.25 355,226.25 528.56 354,697.693. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Net Position Change 208,273.75 208,273.75 46,096.13 -162,177.62 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 4 of 8
58 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (35 detail records)4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 600.00 600.00 98.84 -501.16850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2,249,000.00 0.00 -2,249,000.00 2,249,000.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 750,000.00 0.00 -750,000.00 750,000.00

4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Revenue Totals 2,999,600.00 2,999,600.00 98.84 -2,999,501.16Expense 220 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 0.00 0.00 50.00 -50.00600 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 375,750.00 643.76 375,106.24 375,750.00645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,674,000.00 -2,348.05 2,676,348.05 2,674,000.00

4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Expense Totals 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 -1,654.29 3,051,404.294. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Net Position Change -50,150.00 -50,150.00 1,753.13 51,903.13 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 5 of 8
59 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS (97 detail records)5. WATER FUNDSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 83,000.00 83,000.00 -124,777.46 -207,777.46850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,734,000.00 -459,352.92 -6,932,352.92 6,473,000.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 3,054,552.00 323,377.78 -2,731,174.22 3,054,552.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 7,500.00 0.00 -7,500.00 7,500.00

5. WATER FUNDS Revenue Totals 4,879,052.00 9,618,052.00 -260,752.60 -9,878,804.60Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 258,545.64 258,545.64 10,004.38 248,541.26300 ENGINEERING 268,491.91 9,518.37 258,973.54 268,491.91500 WATER DISTRIBUTION EXPENSE 872,028.16 5,917.73 866,110.43 872,028.16510 WATER TREATMENT AND CONSERVATION 860,333.82 32,947.40 827,386.42 860,333.82510 COST OF POWER AND WATER 289,000.00 24,858.21 264,141.79 289,000.00645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,286,335.00 -188,345.07 7,494,680.07 7,306,335.00690 CAPITALIZATION OF ASSETS 0.00 196,533.56 -196,533.56 0.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 221,170.83 221,170.83 0.00 221,170.83745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 128,067.34 -93,771.09 221,838.43 128,067.34760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 375,000.00 0.00 375,000.00 375,000.00799 ICA EXPENSE 229,267.00 19,000.00 210,267.00 229,267.00

5. WATER FUNDS Expense Totals 5,788,239.70 10,808,239.70 16,663.49 10,791,576.215. WATER FUNDS Net Position Change -909,187.70 -1,190,187.70 -277,416.09 912,771.61 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 6 of 8
60 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 5. WATER FUNDS (244 detail records)6. SEWER FUNDSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 35,395.00 35,395.00 -84,411.16 -119,806.16850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 5,000,000.00 0.00 -5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 2,904,574.00 239,864.21 -2,664,709.79 2,904,574.00882 REVENUE - OTHER 3,300,000.00 0.00 -3,300,000.00 3,300,000.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 2,000.00 0.00 -2,000.00 2,000.00

6. SEWER FUNDS Revenue Totals 11,241,969.00 11,241,969.00 155,453.05 -11,086,515.95Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 247,545.64 247,545.64 9,748.49 237,797.15300 ENGINEERING 231,491.91 9,518.62 221,973.29 231,491.91510 COST OF POWER AND WATER 221,000.00 14,687.93 206,312.07 221,000.00550 WASTEWATER COLLECTION EXPENSE 589,801.84 9,048.82 580,753.02 589,801.84560 WASTEWATER TREATMENT EXPENSE 868,957.58 30,960.26 1,029,397.32 1,060,357.58645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 8,936,803.00 -241,062.80 9,177,865.80 8,936,803.00690 CAPITALIZATION OF ASSETS 0.00 0.00 241,992.80 -241,992.80740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 88,000.00 0.00 88,000.00 88,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 228,855.00 -1,168.75 230,023.75 228,855.00760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 375,000.00 0.00 375,000.00 375,000.00799 ICA EXPENSE 216,530.00 18,000.00 198,530.00 216,530.00

6. SEWER FUNDS Expense Totals 12,003,984.97 12,195,384.97 91,725.37 12,103,659.606. SEWER FUNDS Net Position Change -762,015.97 -953,415.97 63,727.68 1,017,143.65 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 7 of 8
61 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 6. SEWER FUNDS (207 detail records) Grand Total 1,896,277.78 1,919,061.28 -19,140.04 -1,938,201.32 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 8 of 8
62 Fund Type Fund Fund Description Previous Balance
Receipts /
Debits
Disbursements /
Credits
Cash Balance by
Fund
General-Unrestricted 01 General Operating $ 8,211,994.07 $ 553,198.57 $ 1,016,536.18 $ 7,748,656.46 General-Designated 01 General Oper. - Other - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Comm Art - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Fire Museum 3,322.35 - - 3,322.35 General-Designated 01 Planning Deposits - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Sidewalk in Lieu 39,278.46 - - 39,278.46 General-Designated 01 Parkland Trust 300.00 - - 300.00
General-Designated 01 Police Asset Forfeit 12,239.86 - - 12,239.86 General-Designated 01 Parking Fees - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Campbell Tract Redemption - - - 0.00 General-Designated 02 Gifts Donations 28,394.13 120.00 2,648.00 25,866.13 General-Designated 02 K-9 Unit - - - 0.00
General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Hitson 4,624.59 - - 4,624.59 General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Travellers 741.68 - - 741.68 General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Teen Fund 3,956.43 - - 3,956.43 General-Designated 03 YVFD Volunter Fund (418.06) 3,048.73 119.35 2,511.32 General-Restricted 04 Crandell Cash 438,949.24 - - 438,949.24 General-Restricted 05 Property Abatement Recovery 58,546.49 - 500.00 58,046.49 General-Designated 08 Grant Projects Reserve 1,281,987.56 48,488.00 1,330,475.56 - General-Designated 08 PERS Pension Liability Reserve - - - 0.00 General-Designated 09 Reserves for Cap. Outlay 831,125.62 - - 831,125.62 General-Designated 10 Capital Outlay 198,051.00 58,259.14 - 256,310.14 General-Designated 11 Capital Building Project - YPD (112.74) - 113.44 (226.18) General - All General-Designated 12 Debt Servicing - GF (YPD Bldg) 323,073.14 - - 323,073.14 General-Designated 12 Debt Servicing Reserves - GF (YPD Bldg) 200,000.00 - - 200,000.00 General-Designated 90 Payroll Clearing (908,142.65) 632,227.65 539,104.33 (815,019.33) 10,464,231.96 $ Spec. Rev. -Streets 20 Road and Street Funds including HUTA 518,647.89 33,024.12 99,000.84 452,671.17 Spec. Rev. -Streets 21 Local Transportation 374,962.64 - - 374,962.64 Streets Spec. Rev. -Streets 24 Fines - Traffic Safety 208,386.21 1,361.61 7,991.86 201,755.96 1,029,389.77 $ Special Revenue 30 Fire Assessment Spec. Rev 1,058,351.66 25,126.61 15,144.62 1,068,333.65 Special Revenue 31 Landfill Access Fee - Debt Service 50,168.37 20,098.74 175,682.76 (105,415.65) Special Revenues Special Revenue 32 Developer Impact Fees 219,677.62 - - 219,677.62 $ 1,182,595.62 Special Grants 60 Spec Grants Capital Outlay 1,611,811.15 - 6,196.33 1,605,614.82 Special Grants Special Grants 65 Community Development Grants 921,102.34 842.19 1,758.92 920,185.61 SpecialOperating 67 SUMIT Operating 702,929.95 - - 702,929.95 $ 3,228,730.38 Water Enterprise 70 Water Operating 109,867.12 336,304.72 356,520.87 89,650.97 Water Enterprise 71 Water Capital Projects (382,837.99) 292,498.33 - (675,336.32) Water Enterprise 72 Water Debt Servicing 720,762.38 - 7,187.66 713,574.72 Water Enterprise 72 USDA COPS 2010 300,000.00 - - 300,000.00 Water Enterprise Water Enterprise 74 Water Reserves 5,054,820.88 79,036.71 5,133,857.59 - $ 5,561,746.96 Sewer Enterprise 80 Sewer Operating 484,290.91 241,896.76 274,783.54 451,404.13 Sewer Enterprise 81 Sewer Capital Outlay 39,077.00 764,575.29 739,138.06 64,514.23 Sewer Enterprise 82 Sewer Debt Servicing 458,720.98 1,001,433.72 1,001,433.72 458,720.98 Sewer Enterprise 82 USDA COPS 2003 250,000.00 - - 250,000.00 Enterprise-Sewer Sewer Enterprise 84 Sewer Reserves 4,743,896.08 59,622.39 - 4,803,518.47 $ 6,028,157.81 Agency
Agency 92 Agency SUMIT - Cash 19,219.01 - - 19,219.01 $ 19,219.01 COLUMN TOTALS $ 28,191,765.37 $ 3,858,664.95 $ 4,536,358.81 $ 27,514,071.51 $ 27,514,071.51 -
BANK RECAPITULATION PER BANK Market Value Unrealized Gain PER LEDGER L.A.I.F. 0.861% 23,012,280.57 22,716,006.98 (296,273.59) Pershing Bank - CD & Treas Investments 2,452,000.00 2,417,947.01 (34,052.99) Pershing Bank - Cash 245,000.00
Petty Cash Drawers 1,200.00
YVFD Petty Cash -
Banner Bank (DDA for Bank Anticipation Not 1,348.16
MB SUMIT Operating x2233 705,233.99
MB SUMIT Asset Forfeiture X4281 19,219.01
Mechanics Bank - 01015102 1,109,061.62
TOTAL PER BANK 27,545,343.35

ADJUSTMENTS
Less Outstanding Checks MB (39,146.88)
Less Outstanding Checks SVB SUMIT (2,304.04)
Interest CR (GL ) August 2022 (15.21)
Transfer 8/29 - Posted 9/1 at Bank 7,746.45
Transfer 8/29 - Posted 9/6 at Bank 5,591.60
Transfer 8/30 - Posted 9/6 at Bank (493.41)
ACH Return 232.69
ACH Return 238.28
Health Rounding Error (0.04)
BRMS No Surprises Fee (two months now $4 4.59
Reconciling 5.31
VSP 12.51
CalPERS Health Admin Fee BP Rate Adj (9.98)
CalPERS Health Admin Fee BP Rate Adj 6.10
PERS 2.09
Double Reversal (275.31)
Transfer 8/31 MBSC - 9/1 Mechanic 11,661.29
PY EE ACH 8/30/22 (1,374.55)
PY AP ACH 8/30/22 (1,492.04)
MBSC Interest (6,846.46)
MBSC Interest (4,814.83)
TOTAL PER LEDGER 27,514,071.51 27,514,071.51
(0.00)
Corey Middleton, City Mayor
Emily Aldrich, Finance Director

CITY OF YREKA

REPORT ON CASH TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Aug-2022
63 2022-2023 Operating Budget of Revenue and Expenditures with Year to Date Actual Results August 31, 2022
Fund AnalysisMajor Grp Fund Adopted Operating Budget Year to Date 3 Adopted Operating Budget Year to Date 4 Operating Budget Net Actual
Year to Date
Current Cash
Balance
Investment in LAIF 00 - - - - - - -
General Operating 01 7,474,244.57 7,923,861.07 1,181,980.17 7,854,692.39 7,854,692.39 1,328,329.73 (146,349.56) 69,168.68 7,803,797.13 General Operating Fund 7,474,244.57 7,923,861.07 1,181,980.17 7,854,692.39 7,854,692.39 1,328,329.73 69,168.68 (146,349.56) 7,803,797.13 Gifts Donations 02 - - 10,120.00 700.00 700.00 2,648.00 (700.00) 7,472.00 35,188.83 YVFD Volunter Fund 03 13,500.00 13,500.00 - 13,500.00 13,500.00 119.35 - (119.35) 2,511.32Trusts -Crandell-Stewart 04 - - - 2,050.00 2,050.00 - (2,050.00) - 438,949.24Property Abatement 05 - - - - - 500.00 - (500.00) 58,046.49 General Fund Reserves 08 - - 48,488.00 - - - - 48,488.00 1,330,475.56 Reserves for Cap. Outlay 09 - - - - - - - - 831,125.62
Capital Outlay 10 82,500.00 82,500.00 - 82,500.00 82,500.00 (58,259.14) - 58,259.14 256,310.14 Construction Fund 11 - - - - - 113.44 - (113.44) (226.18) General Fund Debt Servicing 12 125,895.00 125,895.00 - 125,895.00 125,895.00 (23,021.25) - 23,021.25 523,073.14 Payroll Clearing 90 (764,015.98) (764,015.98) 34,809.13 - - 86,830.55 (764,015.98) (52,021.42) (815,019.33) General Fund - Restricted or Designated (542,120.98) (542,120.98) 93,417.13 224,645.00 224,645.00 8,930.95 (766,765.98) 84,486.18 2,660,434.83 Total General Fund 6,932,123.59 7,381,740.09 1,275,397.30 8,079,337.39 8,079,337.39 1,337,260.68 (697,597.30) (61,863.38) 10,464,231.96 Gas Tax & Traffic Cong. 20 954,702.40 954,702.40 73,544.24 954,702.44 954,702.44 111,147.22 (0.04) (37,602.98) 452,671.17 Local Transportation 21 200,000.00 200,000.00 - 200,000.00 200,000.00 - - - 374,962.64 Fines - Traffic Safety 24 68,164.14 68,164.14 3,056.25 68,164.14 68,164.14 7,048.61 - (3,992.36) 201,755.96 Road, Street & Transit - Restricted 1,222,866.54 1,222,866.54 76,600.49 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 118,195.83 (0.04) (41,595.34) 1,029,389.77 Total Road, Streets and Transit 1,222,866.54 1,222,866.54 76,600.49 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 118,195.83 (0.04) (41,595.34) 1,029,389.77 Fire Assessment Spec. Rev 30 307,500.00 307,500.00 53,011.03 105,726.24 105,726.24 15,121.04 201,773.76 37,889.99 1,068,333.65Landfill Access Fee - Debt Service 31 240,000.00 240,000.00 40,181.90 240,000.01 240,000.01 176,197.76 (0.01) (136,015.86) (105,415.65) Developer Impact Fees 32 16,000.00 16,000.00 - 9,500.00 9,500.00 - 6,500.00 - 219,677.62 Special Revenue - Restricted 563,500.00 563,500.00 93,192.93 355,226.25 355,226.25 191,318.80 208,273.75 (98,125.87) 1,182,595.62 Total Special Revenue 563,500.00 563,500.00 93,192.93 355,226.25 355,226.25 191,318.80 208,273.75 (98,125.87) 1,182,595.62 Spec Grants Capital Outlay 60 - - - 2,249,000.00 2,249,000.00 4,153.94 (2,249,000.00) (4,153.94) 1,605,614.82Community Development Grants 65 2,249,000.00 2,249,000.00 - 800,750.00 800,750.00 (2,068.14) 1,448,250.00 2,068.14 920,185.61 SUMIT Operating Fund 67 750,600.00 750,600.00 147.46 - - - 750,600.00 147.46 702,929.95 Special Grants - Capital Projects 2,999,600.00 2,999,600.00 147.46 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 2,085.80 (50,150.00) (1,938.34) 3,228,730.38 Special Grants - Operating & Capital Projects 2,999,600.00 2,999,600.00 147.46 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 2,085.80 (50,150.00) (1,938.34) 3,228,730.38 Water Operating 70 - - - 2,585,884.53 2,585,884.53 378,746.30 (378,746.30) (2,585,884.53) 89,650.97 Water Capital Projects 71 2,585,884.55 2,585,884.55 529,273.20 2,853,117.00 7,873,117.00 300,686.82 228,586.38 (5,287,232.45) (675,336.32) Water Debt Servicing 72 2,853,117.00 7,873,117.00 (459,352.92) 349,238.17 349,238.17 (93,388.97) (365,963.95) 7,523,878.83 1,013,574.72 Water Reserves 74 356,738.17 356,738.17 - - - - - 356,738.17 5,133,857.59 Water Enterprise 5,795,739.72 10,815,739.72 69,920.28 5,788,239.70 10,808,239.70 586,044.15 7,500.02 (516,123.87) 5,561,746.96 Sewer Operating 80 (916,687.72) (1,197,687.72) 24,907.49 2,360,449.97 2,360,449.97 306,792.93 (3,558,137.69) (281,885.44) 451,404.13 Sewer Capital Outlay 81 2,360,449.98 2,360,449.98 360,391.15 9,326,680.00 9,518,080.00 239,351.20 (7,157,630.02) 121,039.95 64,514.23 Sewer Debt Servicing 82 9,326,680.00 9,326,680.00 263,858.43 - - - 9,326,680.00 263,858.43 708,720.98 Sewer Reserves 84 318,855.00 318,855.00 (263,858.43) 316,855.00 316,855.00 (1,168.75) 2,000.00 (262,689.68) 4,803,518.47 Sewer Enterprise Fund 11,089,297.26 10,808,297.26 385,298.64 12,003,984.97 12,195,384.97 544,975.38 (1,387,087.71) (159,676.74) 6,028,157.81Total Enterprise Funds 16,885,036.98 21,624,036.98 455,218.92 17,792,224.67 23,003,624.67 1,131,019.53 (1,379,587.69) (675,800.61) 11,589,904.77 SUMIT Agency Trust - Cash 92 - - - - - - - - 19,219.01
Agency Funds - - - - - - - - 19,219.01 \
Total Agency Funds - - - - - - - - 19,219.01
All Funds Combined 33,791,743.61 28,603,127.11 1,900,557.10 30,499,404.89 35,710,804.89 2,779,880.64 (1,919,061.28) (879,323.54) 27,514,071.51 Excess of Rev over Exp.-Surplus/
R E V E N U E E X P E N S E (Deficit)
Approval:______________________________________________________Corey Middleton, Mayor 12/15/2022 8:48 AM 64 City of Yreka Financial Statement Groupings
Summary FY 22-23 YTD Fiscal Performance
as of August 31, 2022
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt

1. GENERAL FUNDSRevenue
801 REVENUE: PROP TAXES 1,208,650.00 1,208,650.00 98,023.51 -1,110,626.49807 MVLF IN LIEU 650,000.00 0.00 -650,000.00 650,000.00810 SALES TAX 3,600,000.00 706,884.66 -2,893,115.34 3,600,000.00813 REVENUE: TOT TAXES 830,000.00 246,998.19 -583,001.81 830,000.00814 REVENUE: FRANCHISE FEES 285,000.00 46,019.14 -238,980.86 285,000.00815 REVENUE - LICENSES AND PERMITS 189,900.00 58,062.31 -131,837.69 189,900.00825 REVENUE - FINES & FORFEITURES 250.00 20.33 -229.67 250.00830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 70,800.00 -130,407.49 -201,207.49 70,800.00850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 348,417.57 56,931.02 -741,103.05 798,034.07870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 50,825.00 4,804.98 -46,020.02 50,825.00880 ICA ALLOCATION 445,797.00 74,000.00 -371,797.00 445,797.00882 REVENUE - OTHER 16,500.00 79,251.52 62,751.52 16,500.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1. GENERAL FUNDS Revenue Totals 7,696,139.57 8,145,756.07 1,240,588.17 -6,905,167.90Expense 100 MAYOR, COUNCIL, CITY MANAGER, CLERK 432,382.41 432,382.41 39,174.64 393,207.77110 EXP. GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1,000,856.81 593,851.57 407,005.24 1,000,856.81130 PUBLIC SAFETY CODE ENFORCEMENT 124,003.29 15,353.23 108,650.06 124,003.29200 PUBLIC SAFETY - POLICE 3,764,055.55 460,547.41 3,303,508.14 3,764,055.55 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 1 of 8
65 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
210 PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE 688,288.33 688,288.33 40,921.13 647,367.20220 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 556,999.77 59,134.95 497,864.82 556,999.77300 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING AND ADMIN 150,103.38 5,957.58 144,145.80 150,103.38350 PUBLIC WORKS - MECHANICAL MAINT (ELIM) 0.01 121,832.46 -121,832.45 0.01370 PUBLIC WORKS - SERVICE CENTER (ELIM) 0.00 2,830.60 -2,830.60 0.00400 CULTURAL & REC - PARKS AND REC 574,386.30 78,824.06 495,562.24 574,386.30645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 72,500.00 -58,145.70 130,645.70 72,500.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 35,000.00 0.00 35,000.00 35,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 90,895.00 -23,021.25 113,916.25 90,895.00760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 589,866.54 0.00 589,866.54 589,866.54

1. GENERAL FUNDS Expense Totals 8,079,337.39 8,079,337.39 1,337,260.68 6,742,076.711. GENERAL FUNDS Net Position Change -383,197.82 66,418.68 -96,672.51 -163,091.19 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 2 of 8
66 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 1. GENERAL FUNDS (932 detail records)2. STREETS FUNDSRevenue 825 REVENUE - FINES & FORFEITURES 15,000.00 15,000.00 3,056.25 -11,943.75830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3,500.00 0.00 -3,500.00 3,500.00850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 614,500.00 62,610.35 -551,889.65 614,500.00887 REVENUE: INKIND 0.00 10,933.89 10,933.89 0.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 589,866.54 0.00 -589,866.54 589,866.54

2. STREETS FUNDS Revenue Totals 1,222,866.54 1,222,866.54 76,600.49 -1,146,266.05Expense 300 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING AND ADMIN 62,542.43 62,542.43 6,428.93 56,113.50310 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET MAINTENANCE 430,564.36 87,061.39 343,502.97 430,564.36311 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET SWEEPING 85,522.92 3,737.55 81,785.37 85,522.92312 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET LIGHTING 56,144.97 4,510.25 51,634.72 56,144.97313 PUBLIC WORKS - WEED CONTROL STREETS 10,995.72 5.00 10,990.72 10,995.72314 PUBLIC WORKS - PUBLIC PARKING LOTS 2,373.41 0.00 2,373.41 2,373.41320 PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC SAFETY 68,164.14 68,164.14 7,048.61 61,115.53340 TRANSPORTATION 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 200,000.00390 PUBLIC WORKS - STORM DRAINS 171,558.63 9,404.10 162,154.53 171,558.63645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 40,000.00 0.00 40,000.00 40,000.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 90,000.00 0.00 90,000.00 90,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00

2. STREETS FUNDS Expense Totals 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 118,195.83 1,104,670.752. STREETS FUNDS Net Position Change -0.04 -0.04 -41,595.34 -41,595.30 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 3 of 8
67 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 2. STREETS FUNDS (261 detail records)3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDSRevenue 811 OTHER TAXES 305,000.00 305,000.00 53,011.03 -251,988.97815 REVENUE - LICENSES AND PERMITS 16,000.00 0.00 -16,000.00 16,000.00830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2,500.00 0.00 -2,500.00 2,500.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 240,000.00 40,181.90 -199,818.10 240,000.00

3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Revenue Totals 563,500.00 563,500.00 93,192.93 -470,307.07Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 65,000.01 65,000.01 1,197.76 63,802.25210 PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 15,000.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 185,708.43 117,787.03 67,921.40 185,708.43745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 80,017.81 72,334.01 7,683.80 80,017.81760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 9,500.00 0.00 9,500.00 9,500.00

3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Expense Totals 355,226.25 355,226.25 191,318.80 163,907.453. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Net Position Change 208,273.75 208,273.75 -98,125.87 -306,399.62 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 4 of 8
68 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (36 detail records)4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 600.00 600.00 147.46 -452.54850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2,249,000.00 0.00 -2,249,000.00 2,249,000.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 750,000.00 0.00 -750,000.00 750,000.00

4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Revenue Totals 2,999,600.00 2,999,600.00 147.46 -2,999,452.54Expense 220 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 0.00 0.00 931.40 -931.40600 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 375,750.00 1,975.02 373,774.98 375,750.00645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,674,000.00 -820.62 2,674,820.62 2,674,000.00

4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Expense Totals 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 2,085.80 3,047,664.204. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Net Position Change -50,150.00 -50,150.00 -1,938.34 48,211.66 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 5 of 8
69 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS (147 detail records)5. WATER FUNDSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 83,000.00 83,000.00 -124,777.46 -207,777.46850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,734,000.00 -459,352.92 -6,932,352.92 6,473,000.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 3,054,552.00 678,958.15 -2,375,593.85 3,054,552.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 7,500.00 0.00 -7,500.00 7,500.00

5. WATER FUNDS Revenue Totals 4,879,052.00 9,618,052.00 94,827.77 -9,523,224.23Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 258,545.64 258,545.64 27,100.10 231,445.54300 ENGINEERING 268,491.91 22,746.04 245,745.87 268,491.91500 WATER DISTRIBUTION EXPENSE 872,028.16 59,232.29 812,795.87 872,028.16510 WATER TREATMENT AND CONSERVATION 860,333.82 179,088.17 681,245.65 860,333.82510 COST OF POWER AND WATER 289,000.00 52,579.70 236,420.30 289,000.00645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,286,335.00 104,153.26 7,202,181.74 7,306,335.00690 CAPITALIZATION OF ASSETS 0.00 196,533.56 -196,533.56 0.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 221,170.83 221,170.83 0.00 221,170.83745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 128,067.34 -93,388.97 221,456.31 128,067.34760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 375,000.00 0.00 375,000.00 375,000.00799 ICA EXPENSE 229,267.00 38,000.00 191,267.00 229,267.00

5. WATER FUNDS Expense Totals 5,788,239.70 10,808,239.70 586,044.15 10,222,195.555. WATER FUNDS Net Position Change -909,187.70 -1,190,187.70 -491,216.38 698,971.32 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 6 of 8
70 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 5. WATER FUNDS (278 detail records)6. SEWER FUNDSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 35,395.00 35,395.00 -84,411.16 -119,806.16850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 5,000,000.00 0.00 -5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 2,904,574.00 479,611.44 -2,424,962.56 2,904,574.00882 REVENUE - OTHER 3,300,000.00 0.00 -3,300,000.00 3,300,000.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 2,000.00 0.00 -2,000.00 2,000.00

6. SEWER FUNDS Revenue Totals 11,241,969.00 11,241,969.00 395,200.28 -10,846,768.72Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 247,545.64 247,545.64 26,297.71 221,247.93300 ENGINEERING 231,491.91 22,560.06 208,931.85 231,491.91510 COST OF POWER AND WATER 221,000.00 29,789.40 191,210.60 221,000.00550 WASTEWATER COLLECTION EXPENSE 589,801.84 30,338.67 559,463.17 589,801.84560 WASTEWATER TREATMENT EXPENSE 868,957.58 161,807.09 898,550.49 1,060,357.58645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 8,936,803.00 -2,641.60 8,939,444.60 8,936,803.00690 CAPITALIZATION OF ASSETS 0.00 0.00 241,992.80 -241,992.80740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 88,000.00 0.00 88,000.00 88,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 228,855.00 -1,168.75 230,023.75 228,855.00760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 375,000.00 0.00 375,000.00 375,000.00799 ICA EXPENSE 216,530.00 36,000.00 180,530.00 216,530.00

6. SEWER FUNDS Expense Totals 12,003,984.97 12,195,384.97 544,975.38 11,650,409.596. SEWER FUNDS Net Position Change -762,015.97 -953,415.97 -149,775.10 803,640.87 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 7 of 8
71 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 6. SEWER FUNDS (233 detail records) Grand Total 1,896,277.78 1,919,061.28 879,323.54 -1,039,737.74 Thursday, December 15, 2022 Page 8 of 8
72 CITY OF YREKA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
TO: Yreka City Council
PREPARED BY: Emily Aldrich, Finance Director
AGENDA TITLE: Approval by Yreka City Council of the City of Yreka the 2021-2022 Closing Operating Budget Revisions
MEETING DATE: Tuesday, December 20, 2022
Discussion:

Budget revisions are needed during the year and at fiscal year ending to reflect changes in the budget estimates to more accurately reflect the revenue and expense trends.

The majority of expense revisions have already been authorized (allowable internal transfers or by Council action), and the following report details by account to ensure public transparency of those actions. The revenue changes, primarily increases, reflect better than project performance results.

Budget adjustments and revisions are a common practice. Attached is a recap by account and description of the budget revisions and accompanying description for the revision.

Fiscal Impact:

Recommendation and Requested Action:

Approval by Yreka City Council of the City of Yreka the 2021-2022 Operating Budget Revisions 73 74
75 76
77 78

Page 1 of 2 ends

CITY OF YREKA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
To: Yreka City Council
From: Jason Ledbetter, City Manager
Prepared by: Rhetta Hogan, Assistant City Manager & John Elsnab, Human Resources Director
Agenda title: Requested action – Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka approving execution of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Yreka and the Yreka Employees’ Association
Meeting date: December 20, 2022
Discussion:

Staff has been negotiating with the Yreka Employees’ Association (YEA) to reach a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The parties agreed on a thirty-month term that addresses employee compensation for wages, health benefits, and certificate pay as follows:

Term Thirty-month term
Wages 5% cost of living adjustment effective the first full pay period in January 2023 and a 4% cost of living adjustment effective the first full pay period in January 2024.

Salary Step Progression The salary schedule consists of five steps, with the lower two steps being eliminated from a previous seven step salary schedule.

Medical Premium The City’s medical cap benefit will increase in plan years 2023, 2024, and 2025. The medical cap benefit is equivalent to the cost of 85% of Pers Gold in year one along with an 8% annual increase to the benefit cap for plan year 2024 and 2025.

Overtime Only hours worked and vacation count towards the calculation of overtime, previous all worked or compensated hours counted.

Callback Pay and
Remote Pay
An employee who is called back to work receives either a minimum of two (2) hours at their overtime rate or if the hours are contiguous to their normal work shift the actual hours worked at the applicable rate of pay. Employees who are able to perform work remotely (including SCADA calls) will be paid a minimum of thirty (30) minutes at their overtime rate per incident or actual time worked whichever is greater. (Previously there was not distinction between the two, and Remote pay was being compensated like Callback pay).

Bilingual Pay Pay premiums of 5% for bilingual pay was added, and is new.

Supervisor Premium Employees who are routinely and consistently assigned by a Manager to supervise or lead a shift in the absence of a supervisor or lead will receive supervisor premium in the amount of five percent (5.0%) of their base hourly rate of pay for those hours worked as a supervisor or lead. Cleanup from previous MOU, that did not differentiate between Temporary Upgrade Pay and Supervisor Premium.

Boot Allowance Modified to reimbursement of $400 upon hire and annually thereafter, from $200.

Deferred
Compensation Match
The City’s annual employer cap of $1,500 per calendar year will increase to $1,750 per year in 2023 and $2,000 per year in 2024.

In addition, the MOU has been overhauled to update the language for accuracy and clarity, as well as compliance with CalPERS reporting.

Estimated Fiscal Impact in dollars:

The fiscal impact is approximately$118,356 Year 1, $196,860 Year 2, and $196,860 Year 3, or $512,077 over the term of the contract.

Recommendation:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka approving execution of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Yreka and the Yreka EMPLOYEES’ Association.

Approved by: __________________________________
Jason Ledbetter, City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-56

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA

APPROVING EXECUTION OF THE MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF YREKA AND

THE YREKA EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Yreka, a municipal corporation, pursuant to California Government Code Section 3500, et seq., enacted an EmployerEmployee Relations policy with its adoption of Resolution No. 2017-10; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager and representatives of the City, and representatives for the Yreka Employees Association have met and conferred in good faith; and, WHEREAS, these parties have reached tentative agreement as of November 23, 2022, on matters relating to the employment conditions of said employees as reflected by the written Memorandum of Understanding for the Yreka Employees Association all of which the City Council has reviewed; and;
WHEREAS, this Council finds that the provisions and agreements contained in the Memorandum of Understanding are fair and proper and in the best interests of the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Council hereby finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct.

Section 2. The Memorandum of Understanding is hereby approved, and the City Manager or designee is hereby authorized and directed to execute said document, with such changes, insertions and omissions as may be approved by the City Manager.

Section 3. The City Manager, the Finance Director, and all other proper officers and officials of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such other agreements, documents and certificates, and to perform such other acts and deeds, as may be necessary or convenient to effect the purposes of this Resolution and the transactions herein authorized.

Section 4. It is further resolved, If any section, subsection, part, clause, sentence or phrase of this Resolution or the application thereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution, the application thereof, shall not be effected thereby but shall remain in full force and effect, it being the intention of the City Council to adopt each and every section, subsection, part, clause, sentence phrase regardless 81 of whether any other section, subsection, part, clause, sentence or phrase or the application thereof is held to be invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

Passed and adopted this 20th day of December 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:
__________________
Corey Middleton
Mayor
Attest:
_____________________
Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk
82 Memorandum of Understanding
Between the
City of Yreka
And the
Yreka Employees Association
January 8, 2023, through July 5, 2025
83 City of Yreka i YEA MOU
Table of Contents
Preamble......................................................................................................................... 1 Recognition ..................................................................................................... 1 Employee Rights ............................................................................................. 1 Association Rights........................................................................................... 1

3.1. Dues................................................................................................................ 1

3.2. New Employee Orientation.............................................................................. 1

3.3. Disclosure of Employee Contact Information: ................................................. 2

3.4. Employee Opt Out Request: ........................................................................... 2

3.5. Notice of Meet and Confer .............................................................................. 2

3.6. Extra-Help ....................................................................................................... 2

3.7. Contracting Out............................................................................................... 2 Wages............................................................................................................. 3

4.1. Salary Schedule.............................................................................................. 3

4.2. Salary Increases ............................................................................................. 3 Overtime Provisions ........................................................................................ 3

5.1. Overtime.......................................................................................................... 3

5.2. Call Back Pay.................................................................................................. 3

5.3. Remote Pay .................................................................................................... 3

5.4. Standby Pay.................................................................................................... 4 Premium Pays................................................................................................. 4

6.1. Bilingual Pay ................................................................................................... 4

6.2. Wastewater License Incentive Pay ................................................................. 4

6.3. Supervisor Premium........................................................................................ 4 Work Hours and Overtime............................................................................... 4

7.1. Work Hours ..................................................................................................... 4 Insurances....................................................................................................... 5

8.1. Medical and Dental Insurance: ........................................................................ 5

8.2. Court-Ordered Health Coverage ..................................................................... 6

8.3. Medical Opt-Out.............................................................................................. 6

8.4. Vision Insurance: ............................................................................................. 6

8.5. Life Insurance:................................................................................................. 7

8.6. California State Disability: ............................................................................... 7 Probationary Period ........................................................................................ 7 84 City of Yreka ii YEA MOU

9.1. Length of Probation......................................................................................... 7

9.2. Separation Without Cause .............................................................................. 7

9.3. Probation after Promotion ............................................................................... 7

9.4. Maintenance Worker Classification................................................................. 7

9.5. Positions Requiring Special Licensing ............................................................ 8 Retirement..................................................................................................... 8 Deferred Compensation ................................................................................ 8 Allowances.................................................................................................... 8

12.1. Boot Allowance ............................................................................................... 8 Leaves........................................................................................................... 8

13.1. Vacation Leave ............................................................................................... 8

13.2. Holidays .......................................................................................................... 9

13.3. Floating Holiday .............................................................................................. 9

13.4. Sick Leave..................................................................................................... 10

13.5. Bereavement Leave ...................................................................................... 10 Grievance Procedure .................................................................................. 10 Concerted Activities .................................................................................... 11 Term............................................................................................................ 12 85 City of Yreka 1 YEA MOU
Preamble
This Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Yreka (City) and the Yreka Employees Association (Association) has as its purpose the promotion of harmonious labor relations between the City and Association, and the establishment of rates of pay, hours of work, and other conditions of employment.

Recognition
The City recognizes the Association as the sole and exclusive representative for full-time employees in the classifications listed in Appendix “A” Recognition, as amended.

Employee Rights
The City may not search the employee’s person or their personal property and effects; including handbags, briefcases, backpacks, lunch boxes, or other personal items that the employee may bring to work
Association Rights
Upon certification from the Association that an employee has signed an authorization for the deduction of dues, the City shall make payroll deductions in an amount to be determined by the Association and communicated to the City annually. The City shall promptly remit deductions to the Association with a list of dues-paying members. The City will transmit payment to the Association through Electronic Funds Transfers (EFT).

Employee requests to cancel membership dues deductions must be directed to the Association. Upon notification from the Association that an employee has canceled membership dues, the City will promptly cease dues deductions from the employee’s paycheck. The City may only request a copy of a dues authorization in the event of a dispute. The Association will hold the City harmless from any and all claims and will indemnify it against any unreasonable costs in implementing this provision, and shall indemnify the City for any claims made by the employee for deductions made in reliance on that certification, in accordance with Government Code §1157.12(a).

New employee orientation shall occur within 30 days of an employee’s hire. The Association shall be provided not less than ten (10) days advance notice of any new employee orientation session, unless otherwise agreed to in writing (e.g., email). The City shall allow two (2) representatives to address the employees being oriented for up to thirty (30) minutes and the employee representatives conducting orientation shall be granted paid release time to do so, including reasonable travel time if needed.

Management representatives will excuse themselves during the Association portion of the orientation, unless otherwise agreed at the time of the orientation, and the Association agrees not to engage in speech that could cause substantial disruption or material 86 City of Yreka 2 YEA MOU
interference with City activities.

The parties acknowledge that this Agreement fully complies with and exhausts the parties’ obligation to negotiate pursuant to Government Code Section 3557. Due to such agreement, compulsory arbitration pursuant to Government Code Section 3557 is waived for as long as this Agreement is in effect.

The City will provide the Association a digital file via email to the email address designated by the Association containing the following information, if available and permitted by the employee (see Employee Opt Out Request):
• Name • Work, home and personal cellular telephone numbers • Job title • Personal email addresses on file with the Employer • Department • Home address
• Work location
Such information will be provided as follows:
• New Hires: Within thirty
(30) days of the date of
hire.
• Regularly, for all employees: quarterly effective
within thirty (30) days of the end of each calendar
quarter.

An employee may opt-out of the requirement to provide the below personal information by making a written request to the City. The City shall promptly forward a copy of any such request to the Association.
• Home address • Personal email address
• Home telephone number • Birth date
• Personal cellular telephone number
The City will provide notice to the Association President regarding changes in job classifications or policy that fall within the scope of representation under the MMBA. The Association has fifteen (15) days to request a meet and confer. Three (3) members of the Association may be on paid release time while attending meetings with the City during the meet and confer process.

The City will provide the Association notice at the time of posting for extra-help and parttime employees. 87 City of Yreka 3 YEA MOU
If the City intends to contract out for services currently provided by YEA, the City will notice YEA. YEA will have fifteen (15) days to request a meet and confer over the decision and the impacts.

Wages
The salary schedule consists of five (5) steps, with five percent (5.0%) between steps (1) through (5). The Salary Schedule is attached as Appendix “B” Salary Schedule.

Employees advance steps upon completion of a satisfactory performance evaluation.

Effective January 8, 2023, all classifications will receive a five percent (5.0) increase.

Effective January 7, 2024, all classifications will receive a four percent (4.0%) increase.

Overtime Provisions
The City has the right to assign and schedule overtime. Whenever possible, overtime is assigned first to those employees who volunteer for overtime assignments; however, the City is not obligated to solicit volunteers before making overtime assignments. The assignment of overtime to employees does not constitute a change in shift, work schedule, or days and hours of employment.
“Overtime” is defined as work in excess of forty (40) hours per work week, only actual hours worked and vacation leave count towards the calculation of overtime. Overtime is paid at the rate of one and a half (1.5) times the employee’s regular rate of pay.

Compensation shall be either payment or Compensatory Time Off (CTO) at the option of the employee, except when responding to an OES or mutual aid event, CTO is not allowed. Employees may accrue a maximum of one hundred and twenty (120) hours of CTO. Employees may cash out CTO during the year in which it was accrued, any CTO remaining will be paid out on the final pay check in December.

An employee who is called back to work receives either a minimum of two (2) hours at their overtime rate or if the hours are contiguous to their normal work shift the actual hours worked at the applicable rate of pay.

Employees who are able to perform work remotely (including SCADA calls) will be paid a minimum of thirty (30) minutes at their overtime rate per incident or actual time worked whichever is greater.
88 City of Yreka 4 YEA MOU
Employees assigned to standby will receive full standby pay on weekends or holidays if the employee’s regularly scheduled work hours on that day are 4 hours or less. Standby pay is paid at the rate of $70.00 per full 24-hour standby period (non-holiday weekend day), $35.00 for less than a 24-hour standby period (non-holiday weekday), and $140.00 per holiday day.

Observed holidays for standby include holidays defined in section 13.2 and the actual day of the holiday, should it fall on a weekend, for the following holidays: January 1st, July 4th, November 11th, December 24th, and December 25th.

Premium Pays
Employees who are routinely and consistently required to read, write, and speak a language other than English and who are able to do so fluently will receive bilingual premium in the amount of five percent (5.0%) of their base rate of pay. The method of certifying proficiency and the determination of which languages are eligible for bilingual pay is determined by the City.

A Water Operator II/III or Wastewater Operator II/III who attains dual water and wastewater operator licenses receive Wastewater License Incentive Pay in an amount of five percent (5%) of their base rate of pay.

License incentive pay is retroactive to the date of the license, provided that the employee submits the license or evidence of successful completion to the Human Resources within thirty (30) days of receipt.

Employees who are routinely and consistently assigned by a Manager to supervise or lead a shift in the absence of a supervisor or lead will receive supervisor premium in the amount of five percent (5.0%) of their base hourly rate of pay for those hours worked as a supervisor or lead.

Work Hours and Overtime
The standard workweek is 40 hours. The work period for employees on the standard work schedule begins at 12:01 a.m. on Sunday and ends at 12:00 midnight the following Saturday.

The regular workday is eight (8) hours. The two typical work schedules, as follows:
89 City of Yreka 5 YEA MOU
Work Type/Location Typical Work Hours Typical Break Periods Public Works Yard 7 am to 3:30 pm ½ hour, two 15 minute breaks City Hall & Administrative 8 am to 5 pm 1 hour, two 15 minute breaks The flexing of work schedules may be approved by the department manager.

Occasionally, Supervisors, Department Heads and the City Manager may require an employee to work a schedule different from their typical schedule to meet the needs of the City prompted by an emergency or a specific project. Unless an emergency exists, the City will provide at least 72 hours written notice when an employee will be required to work other than their normal schedule. Schedules shall not be changed to avoid the payment of overtime.

It is the policy of the City that employees be provided breaks for 15 minutes in the morning and 15 minutes in the afternoon; provided, however, the Association acknowledges that in the event of an emergency affecting the public health and safety or injury to persons or property, such break may be cancelled in such event and provided to the employee later in the day if the emergency has concluded. “Emergency” as used herein is an event where there is immediate danger to persons or property requiring the employee’s service such as flooding, fires, sewage backups or hazardous material spills.

Insurances
The City contracts for employee's and their dependents, and retiree’s and their dependents, medical insurance benefit plans through the CalPERS Public Employees Medical and Hospital Care Program. Employee deductions are “pre-tax.” Effective plan year 2023, the City contributes up to the following amounts towards employee medical insurance coverage and cafeteria plan benefits:

Tier Medical Benefit Cafeteria Plan Benefit Total Benefit Employee only Note 1 Note 2 Note 3
Employee plus one Note 1 Note 2 Note 4
Employee plus family Note 1 Note 2 Note 5
Note 1: The Medical Benefit is equal to the minimum established annually by CalPERS.

Note 2: Cafeteria Plan Benefit is equal to the difference between the Medical Benefit and the Total Benefit.

Note 3: The total benefit is equal to $701.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 4: The total benefit is equal to $1,404.00 plus 100% of the dental premium. 90 City of Yreka 6 YEA MOU
Note 5: The total benefit is equal to $1,825.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Effective plan year 2024, the City contributes up to the following amounts towards employee medical insurance coverage and cafeteria plan benefits:

Note 1: The Medical Benefit is equal to the minimum established annually by CalPERS.

Note 2: Cafeteria Plan Benefit is equal to the difference between the Medical Benefit and the Total Benefit.

Note 3: The total benefit is equal to $758.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 4: The total benefit is equal to $1,516.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 5: The total benefit is equal to $1,971.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Effective plan year 2025, the City contributes up to the following amounts towards employee medical insurance coverage and cafeteria plan benefits:

Note 1: The Medical Benefit is equal to the minimum established annually by CalPERS.

Note 2: Cafeteria Plan Benefit is equal to the difference between the Medical Benefit and the Total Benefit.

Note 3: The total benefit is equal to $819.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 4: The total benefit is equal to $1,637.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 5: The total benefit is equal to $2,128.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

An employee with court-ordered dependent health coverage must show proof of that order in the form of a qualified domestic relations' order (“QDRO”) before dependent coverage can be extended and otherwise meet the standards and regulations of the CalPERS Health Plan.

An employee who is currently opting out as of December 31, 2022, and continuously elects to opt-out of City offered health insurance, is eligible for an opt-out payment of $230.77 per paycheck. Effective January 1, 2024, the opt-out payment is $184.62 per paycheck. Effective January 1, 2025, the opt-out payment is $138.46 per paycheck.

Effective January 1, 2026, the opt-out payment is $92.31 per paycheck. Effective January 1, 2027, the opt-out payment is $46.15 per paycheck. Effective January 1, 2028, the optout is eliminated. The opt-out payment is taxable income. An employee who is opting out may accept medical insurance but is no longer eligible to receive the opt-out payment in the future. The opt-out payment is taxable income. An employee who is receiving insurance through the City may not receive the opt-out payment.

The City provides vision plan B through the California Vision Service Plan (VSP) for employees and their dependents. City retains the right to self-insure at the same benefit level.
91 City of Yreka 7 YEA MOU
The City provides life insurance equal to the amount of the employees annual gross base salary and dependent coverage in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per spouse and child.

Employees contribute to the California State Disability Insurance program (includes SDI and Paid Family Leave benefits).

Probationary Period
The probationary period is six (6) months of actual and continuous service, except for the Maintenance Worker classification, that has a twelve (12) month probationary period. The probationary period will automatically be extended by the length of any authorized leave(s) of absence of one work week or more.

At any time during the probationary period, the employment relationship may be terminated without cause and without right of appeal, grievance, or hearing. The probationary employee will be notified prior to the expiration of the probationary period if they are released from employment.

On accepting a promotion, an employee serves a new probationary period of six (6) months of actual and continuous service. The probationary period will automatically be extended by the length of any authorized leave(s) of one work week or more. An employee does not acquire regular status in the promotional position until the successful completion of this probationary period. If the employee fails to satisfactorily complete the probationary period in the promotional positions, the employee will be entitled to return to the position held prior to promotion at the range and step previously held if not subject to termination for disciplinary reasons. The employee is not entitled to notice or hearing if rejected during probation; however, employees placed in a promotional position can request a mid-probationary period evaluation.

New employees in the classification of Maintenance Worker have three (3) opportunities paid by the City to obtain a Class A Commercial Driver’s License with air brake and tanker endorsements within one hundred eighty (180) days of hire. 92 City of Yreka 8 YEA MOU
Employees required to have special licensing or certification (i.e., Distribution I) shall obtain such certification within two testing cycles.

Retirement
Employees hired after June 30, 1974, who are not classified as new members receive the 2% at 55 miscellaneous CalPERS formula (1084) with the three (3) year final average compensation period. These employees pay the required seven percent (7%) member contribution, on a pre-tax basis.

Employees hired after December 31, 2012, who are classified as new members receive the 2% at 62 miscellaneous CalPERS formula (26550) with the three (3) year final average compensation period. These employees pay half of the total normal cost as determined annually by CalPERS on a pre-tax basis.

Miscellaneous retirement formulas have the following optional CalPERS retirement benefits:
• Military Service Credit
• Sick Leave Service Credit
• 2% Retirement COLA
Deferred Compensation
The City matches one dollar ($1.00), for every two dollars ($2.00) contributed by the employee into their deferred compensation account. The maximum City match is $1,750 per year, effective, January 7, 2024, the City match is $2,000 per year. The City’s contribution is deposited into the employee’s 457 plan.

Allowances
Public Works employees working in the field receive a reimbursement of four hundred dollars ($400.00) upon hire and annually thereafter for the purchase and maintenance of work boots.

Leaves
Employees accrue vacation as follows:

Months of Employment Vacation Hours Per Pay Period Maximum Accrual 0 – 60 months 3.08 hours 160 hours
61 – 180 months 4.62 hours 240 hours
93 City of Yreka 9 YEA MOU
181+ 6.15 hours 320 hours
Employees cease to accrue vacation once their maximum accrual limit has been reached until accrued vacation is reduced below their maximum accrual limit.

Part-time City employees, who become full-time employees without separation of service, are credited for part-time City service, for the purpose of computing months of employment for their vacation accrual rate. One hundred seventy-three (173) hours of part-time service equals one (1) month of employment.

The City Recognizes the following holidays:

Holiday Date Holiday Day Observed
July 4th Independence Day
First Monday in September Labor Day
November 11th Veteran’s Day
Last Thursday in November Thanksgiving Day
Friday Following Thanksgiving Day After Thanksgiving Day December 24th Christmas Eve
December 25th Christmas Day
January 1st New Year’s Day
Third Monday in January Martin Luther King Day
Third Monday in February President’s Day
Last Monday in May Memorial Day
When a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday is observed as the holiday and when a holiday falls on a Saturday, the preceding Friday is observed as the holiday.

Should December 24th fall on a Friday, December 23rd is observed as the holiday. Should December 25th fall on a Monday, December 26th is observed as the holiday.

Employees receive twenty-four (24) hours of floating holidays annually on the first full pay period in January. Floating holidays must be used or forfeited by December 31.

Floating holidays for new employees are prorated as follows:

Hire Date Proration
January 1 – March 31 24 hours
April 1 – June 30 18 hours
July 1 – September 30 12 hours
94 City of Yreka 10 YEA MOU
October 1 – December 31 6 hours
Employees accrue three and sixty-nine hundredths (3.69) hours of sick leave per pay period.

Employees may take up to twenty-four (24) hours of bereavement leave for the death of an immediate family member. “Immediate family” is defined as the employee’s: spouse, domestic partner, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, mother/father-inlaw, brother/sister-in-law, or has met the criteria for a loco parentis relationship.

Grievance Procedure
Purpose – This grievance procedure is used to process and resolve grievances at the lowest possible level. This procedure does not apply to any dispute for which there is another established resolution procedure.

Grievance – A grievance is a good faith compliant of one (1) or more employees or a dispute between the City and the Association involving the interpretation or application of any provision of this Memorandum of Understanding.

Grievant is defined as the employee(s) or the Association who filed the grievance.

A written grievance must identify the provision alleged to have been misinterpreted or misapplied; describe the circumstances of the alleged misapplication or misinterpretation; and specify the remedy sought.

No matter is considered a grievance under this Article unless it is presented in writing within thirty (30) days after the occurrence or when the employee knew or should have known of the events on which the grievance was based.

Step 1 Supervisor – The grievant will discuss the grievance with the employee's immediate supervisor before filing a written grievance.

Step 2 Department Head – If the grievance is not resolved at Step 1, the grievant may appeal by filing a written grievance with their Department Head within thirty (30) days after the occurrence of the events on which the grievance was based. The Department Head will provide a written response to the grievant within fourteen (14) days of receiving the written grievance.

Step 3 City Manager – If the grievance is not resolved at Step 2, the grievant may appeal in writing to the City Manager within fourteen (14) days after receiving a Step 2 response.

The City Manager will review the matter, investigate and provide a written response to the grievant within fourteen (14) days of receiving the written appeal. The City manager 95 City of Yreka 11 YEA MOU
may confer with the grievant, Department Head, and necessary staff in an attempt to resolve the grievance.

Step 4 Arbitration – If the grievance is not resolved at Step 3, the grievant may appeal to arbitration within fourteen (14) days after receiving a Step 3 response.

The arbitrator may be selected by mutual agreement, or the City will request a list of seven (7) arbitrators from the State Mediation and Conciliation Services. The parties will alternate striking from the list and the remaining person will be accepted as the arbitrator.

The moving party will strike first.

If there is a dispute as to the grievability of a matter, the arbitrator will first rule on the grievability of the matter prior to hearing the grievance.

Any dispute between the parties as to the grievability of an issue or as to whether the requirements of this procedure have been met shall be presented to the arbitrator, after the grievance has proceeded through the appeal to the City Manager, as outlined below.

The Arbiter will rule on the dispute before proceeding with a hearing by the City Council.

The arbitrator will provide a written advisory decision to the parties within thirty (30) days.

Within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the advisory decision, the City Manager will review the arbitrator’s recommendation and render a written decision on the merits of the grievance.

Costs – The fees and costs for the arbitrator and court reporter will be borne equally between the parties.

Time Limits – The parties can agree to waive timelines and waive steps when deemed in the best interest of of the parties. If the City fails to meet a specified timeline the grievant may advance to the next step. If the grievant fails to meet a timeline the grievance will be deemed withdrawn.

Concerted Activities
A. The parties acknowledge that the services performed by employees are essential to the public health, safety, and general welfare of the residents of the City of Yreka. The Association will not recommend, encourage, cause or permit its members to initiate, participate in, nor will any employee take part in any strike, sitdown, stay-in, sick-out, or slow-down to affect an employer-employee relations position (work-stoppage), in any office or department of the City, nor curtail any work or restrict any production, or interfere with any operation of the City. Picketing is prohibited on matters involving wages, insurance coverage, and leaves from work during the term of this Agreement. In the event of a work stoppage by any employee, the City is not required to negotiate on the merits of any dispute that gave rise to the work stoppage until the work stoppage has ceased.

B. The City agrees not to lock out employees.
96 City of Yreka 12 YEA MOU
C. In the event of any work stoppage during the term of this Agreement, whether by the Association or any employee, the Association through its officers, must immediately declare in writing that such work stoppage is illegal and unauthorized, and further direct its members in writing to cease the conduct and resume work.

Copies of written notice will be provided to the City. In the event of any work stoppage the Association properly and in good faith performs the obligations of the paragraph, and providing the Association had not otherwise authorized, permitted or encouraged the work stoppage, the Association is not liable for any damages caused by the violation of this provision. However, the City has the right to discipline, up to and including discharge, any employee who instigates, participates in, or gives leadership to any work stoppage activity herein prohibited, and the City has the right to seek full legal redress, including damages, against any such employee.

Term
This Agreement remains in full force and effect from January 8, 2023, through July 5, 2025.

Date: ___________________ Date: __________________
City of Yreka Yreka Employees Association
__________________________ ___________________________
Michael W. Jarvis Ron Copeland
Chief Negotiator Labor Relations Representative
Liebert Cassidy Whitmore UPEC
__________________________ ___________________________
John Eslnab James Hoy
Human Resources Director President
___________________________ __________________________
Rhetta Hogan Jeff Green
Assistant City Manager Vice-President
__________________________ __________________________
Jason Ledbetter Melissa Sandberg
City Manager
97 City of Yreka 13 YEA MOU
Appendix “A” Recognition
Fiscal and Administrative Technician I/II
Senior Fiscal and Administrative Technician
Maintenance Worker
Senior Maintenance Worker
Mechanic
Senior Mechanic
Water Treatment Plant Operator II/III
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator OIT/I/II/III
98 City of Yreka 14 YEA MOU
Appendix B – Salary Schedule
City of Yreka
Yreka Employees Association
For Period 1/8/2023 to 7/5/2025
YEA Annual Salary Schedule – Effective 1/8/23 to 1/6/2024 YEA Annual Salary Schedule – Effective 1/7/24 to 7/5/2025

JOB TITLE UNIT COLA RANGE STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN YEA 1.05 1247 45,050.19 47,302.70 49,667.84 52,151.24 54,758.81 MAINTENANCE WORKER YEA 1.05 1247 45,050.19 47,302.70 49,667.84 52,151.24 54,758.81 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR OIT/1 YEA 1.05 1277 45,050.19 47,302.70 49,667.84 52,151.24 54,758.81 CLASS 1 WATER MAINTENANCE YEA 1.05 1277 45,050.19 47,302.70 49,667.84 52,151.24 54,758.81 SENIOR FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN YEA 1.05 1345 47,302.70 49,667.84 52,151.24 54,758.81 57,496.76 SENIOR MAINTENANCE WORKER YEA 1.05 1345 47,302.70 49,667.84 52,151.23 54,758.79 57,496.73 MECHANIC YEA 1.05 1345 47,302.70 49,667.84 52,151.23 54,758.79 57,496.73 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR II YEA 1.05 1409 49,667.84 52,151.23 54,758.79 57,496.73 60,371.57 WATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR II YEA 1.05 1409 49,667.84 52,151.23 54,758.79 57,496.73 60,371.57 SENIOR MECHANIC YEA 1.05 1409 49,667.84 52,151.23 54,758.79 57,496.73 60,371.57 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR III YEA 1.05 1667 58,607.80 61,538.19 64,615.10 67,845.85 71,238.15

JOB TITLE UNIT COLA RANGE STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN YEA 1.04 1247 46,852.19 49,194.81 51,654.56 54,237.29 56,949.16 MAINTENANCE WORKER YEA 1.04 1247 46,852.19 49,194.81 51,654.56 54,237.29 56,949.16 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR OIT/1 YEA 1.04 1277 46,852.19 49,194.81 51,654.56 54,237.29 56,949.16 CLASS 1 WATER MAINTENANCE YEA 1.04 1277 46,852.19 49,194.81 51,654.56 54,237.29 56,949.16 SENIOR FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN YEA 1.04 1345 49,194.81 51,654.55 54,237.28 56,949.15 59,796.61 SENIOR MAINTENANCE WORKER YEA 1.04 1345 49,194.81 51,654.55 54,237.28 56,949.15 59,796.61 MECHANIC YEA 1.04 1345 49,194.81 51,654.55 54,237.28 56,949.15 59,796.61 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR II YEA 1.04 1409 51,654.55 54,237.28 56,949.15 59,796.61 62,786.45 WATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR II YEA 1.04 1409 51,654.55 54,237.28 56,949.15 59,796.61 62,786.45 SENIOR MECHANIC YEA 1.04 1409 51,654.55 54,237.28 56,949.15 59,796.61 62,786.45 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR III YEA 1.04 1667 60,952.11 63,999.72 67,199.71 70,559.70 74,087.69 99

Page 1 of 2 ends

CITY OF YREKA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
To: Yreka City Council
From: Jason Ledbetter, City Manager
Prepared by: Rhetta Hogan, Assistant City Manager & John Elsnab, Human Resources Director
Agenda title: Requested action – Adopt a Resolution Approving the Compensation for Unrepresented Employees (Department Heads)
Meeting date: December 20, 2022
Discussion:

The City has unrepresented management positions including department heads that are not represented uner a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for purposes of defining compensation..

These positions in the past have historically followed the Yreka Management Employees Memorandum of Understanding (YMEA), although staff agrees that the best management practice would be to separate unrepresented management and define salary and benefits in the proposed compensation resolution.

Term Thirty-month term
Benchmarks The top step for the Lieutenant is benchmarked at thirty percent (30.0%) above the top step of the Sergeant.

The top step for the Chief of Police is benchmarked at fifteen percent (15.0%) above the top step of the Lieutenant.

Wages 4% cost of living adjustment effective the first full pay period in January 2023 and a 2% cost of living adjustment effective the first full pay period in January 2024.

POST Certificate Pay Lieutenant who possesses a POST Management Certificate receive POST Certificate pay in the amount of five percent (5.0%) of their base hourly rate of pay.

Chief who possesses a POST Executive Certificate receive POST Certificate pay in the amount of five percent (5.0%) of their base hourly rate of pay.

Callback Pay Lieutenants who are called back to work for a critical incident (i.e., death in custody, officer involved shooting, major injury, or major damage), an Office of Emergency Services event, or a mutual aid event will receive straight time for all hours worked.

Premium Pay Lieutenant who is routinely and consistently assigned by the Chief of Police to supervise in their absence will receive supervisor premium 100
in the amount of five percent (5.0%) of their base hourly rate of pay for those hours worked.

Deferred
Compensation Match
Dollar for dollar match up to the City’s annual employer cap of $2,000.

Estimated Fiscal Impact in dollars:

The fiscal impact is approximately$136,528 Year 1, $164,203 Year 2, and $165,282 Year 3, or $466,013 over the term of the contract.

Recommendation:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka approving Compensation for Department Heads and Unrepresented Management Positions.

Approved by: __________________________________
Jason Ledbetter, City Manager
101
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-57

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA

APPROVING THE COMPENSATION RESOLUTION FOR

UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, upon adoption, this Resolution supersedes any and all prior adopted Department Head salary and benefits resolutions; and
WHEREAS, this Resolution sets forth the salary and benefit compensation for unrepresented classifications as described heriein; and WHEREAS, this Council finds that the provisions and agreements contained in the Compensation Resolution are fair and proper and in the best interests of the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Council hereby finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct.

Section 2. The Compensation Resolution is hereby approved, and the City Manager or designee is hereby authorized and directed to execute said document, with such changes, insertions and omissions as may be approved by the City Manager.

Section 4. It is further resolved, If any section, subsection, part, clause, sentence or phrase of this Resolution or the application thereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution, the application thereof, shall not be effected thereby but shall remain in full force and effect, it being the intention of the City Council to adopt each and every section, subsection, part, clause, sentence phrase regardless of whether any other section, subsection, part, clause, sentence or phrase or the application thereof is held to be invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. 102
Passed and adopted this 20th day of December 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________
Corey Middleton, Mayor
Attest:
____________________
Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk
103
City of Yreka
Compensation Resolution for
Unrepresented Employees
Effective January 8, 2023
104
City of Yreka i Unrepresented Resolution
Table of Contents
Application....................................................................................................... 1 Wages............................................................................................................. 1

2.1. Salary Schedule.............................................................................................. 1

2.2. Step Advancement.......................................................................................... 1

2.3. Benchmark Classifications .............................................................................. 1

2.4. Salary Increases ............................................................................................. 1 Premium Pays................................................................................................. 1

3.1. POST Peace Officer Certificate....................................................................... 1

3.2. Supervisor Premium........................................................................................ 2

3.3. Callback Pay ................................................................................................... 2 Insurances....................................................................................................... 2

4.1. Medical and Dental Insurance: ........................................................................ 2

4.2. Court-Ordered Health Coverage ..................................................................... 3

4.3. Vision Insurance: ............................................................................................. 3

4.4. Life Insurance.................................................................................................. 3 Retirement....................................................................................................... 3

5.1. CalPERS Retirement ...................................................................................... 3

5.2. Miscellaneous CalPERS Retirement............................................................... 3

5.3. Safety CalPERS Retirement ........................................................................... 4 Deferred Compensation .................................................................................. 4 Leaves ............................................................................................................ 4

7.1. Vacation Leave ............................................................................................... 4

7.2. Holidays .......................................................................................................... 5

7.3. Administrative Leave....................................................................................... 5

7.4. Sick Leave....................................................................................................... 5

7.5. Bereavement Leave ........................................................................................ 6 Effective Date.................................................................................................. 6 105
City of Yreka 1 Unrepresented Resolution
Application
This resolution applies to full-time unrepresented employees in the classifications listed in Appendix “A” Application, as amended.

Wages
The salary schedule consists of five (5) steps, with five percent (5.0%) between steps (1) through (5). The Salary Schedule is attached as Appendix “B” Salary Schedule.

Employees advance steps upon completion of a satisfactory performance evaluation.

Effective January 8, 2023, a new top step was added and the bottom two steps were removed, resulting in a five (5) step salary schedule.

Employees automatically receive step advancements until they reach the top step of their salary schedule unless they receive a performance evaluation prior to their anniversary date where the overall rating is equivalent to “does not meet expectations” or “needs improvement.” Anniversary date is defined as the employee’s date of hire or last date of promotion, whichever is later.

The top step for the Lieutenant is benchmarked at thirty percent (30.0%) above the top step of the Sergeant.

The top step for the Chief of Police is benchmarked at fifteen percent (15.0%) above the top step of the Lieutenant.

Effective January 8, 2023, all classifications with the exception of benchmark classifications will receive a four percent (4.0) increase.

Effective January 7, 2024, all classifications with the exception of benchmark classifications will receive a two percent (2.0) increase.

Premium Pays
Lieutenants who possess a POST Management Certificate receive POST Certificate pay in the amount of five percent (5.0%) of their base hourly rate of pay.

Employees who possess a POST Executive Certificate receive POST Certificate pay in the amount of five percent (5.0%) of their base hourly rate of pay. 106
City of Yreka 2 Unrepresented Resolution
POST pay is retroactive to the date of the POST certificate, provided that the employee submits the certificate to the Human Resources Director within 30 days of receipt.

Lieutenants who are routinely and consistently assigned by the Chief of Police to supervise in their absence will receive supervisor premium in the amount of five percent (5.0%) of their base hourly rate of pay for those hours worked.

Lieutenants who are called back to work for a critical incident (i.e., death in custody, officer involved shooting, major injury, or major damage), an Office of Emergency Services event, or a mutual aid event will receive straight time for all hours worked.

Insurances
The City contracts for employees and their dependents, and retirees and their dependents, medical insurance benefit plans through the CalPERS Public Employees Medical and Hospital Care Program. Employee deductions are “pre-tax.” Effective plan year 2023, the City contributes up to the following amounts towards employee medical insurance coverage and cafeteria plan benefits:

Note 2: Cafeteria Plan Benefit is equal to the difference between the Medical Benefit and the Total Benefit.

Note 3: The total benefit is equal to $701.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 4: The total benefit is equal to $1,404.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 5: The total benefit is equal to $1,825.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Effective plan year 2024, the City contributes up to the following amounts towards employee medical insurance coverage and cafeteria plan benefits:

Note 1: The Medical Benefit is equal to the minimum established annually by CalPERS.

Note 2: Cafeteria Plan Benefit is equal to the difference between the Medical Benefit and the Total Benefit.

Note 3: The total benefit is equal to $758.00 plus 100% of the dental premium. 107
City of Yreka 3 Unrepresented Resolution
Note 4: The total benefit is equal to $1,516.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 5: The total benefit is equal to $1,971.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Effective plan year 2025, the City contributes up to the following amounts towards employee medical insurance coverage and cafeteria plan benefits:

Note 1: The Medical Benefit is equal to the minimum established annually by CalPERS.

Note 2: Cafeteria Plan Benefit is equal to the difference between the Medical Benefit and the Total Benefit.

Note 3: The total benefit is equal to $819.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 4: The total benefit is equal to $1,637.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 5: The total benefit is equal to $2,128.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

The City provides vision plan B through the California Vision Service Plan (VSP) for employees and their dependents.

The City provides life insurance equal to the amount of the employees annual gross base salary and dependent coverage in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per spouse and child.

Retirement
The City contracts with California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) for retirement benefits.

Employees hired after June 30, 1974, who are not classified as new members receive the 2% at 55 miscellaneous CalPERS formula (1084) with the three (3) year final average compensation period. These employees pay the required seven percent (7%) member contribution, on a pre-tax basis.

Miscellaneous retirement formulas have the following optional CalPERS retirement benefits:
• Military Service Credit
• Sick Leave Service Credit
• 2% Retirement COLA
Employees hired after June 30, 1974, who are not classified as new member members receive the 2% at 50 safety CalPERS formula (1085) with the three (3) year final average compensation period. These employees pay the required nine percent (9%) member contribution, on a pre-tax basis.

Employees hired after December 31, 2012, who are classified as new members receive the 2.7% at 57 safety CalPERS formula (25443) with the three (3) year final average compensation period. These employees pay half of the total normal cost as determined annually by CalPERS on a pre-tax basis.

Safety retirement formulas have the following optional CalPERS retirement benefits:

Military Service Credit
Sick Leave Service Credit
2% Retirement COLA
Deferred Compensation
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the City’s Deferred Compensation Plan and IRS rules, Employees may participate in the City’s section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan. The City matches dollar for dollar contributed by employees into their deferred compensation account up to the maximum City match of $2,000 per year. The City’s contribution is deposited into the employee’s 457 plan.

Leaves
Employees accrue vacation as follows:

Months of Employment Vacation Hours Per Pay Period Maximum Accrual 0 – 60 months 3.08 hours 160 hours
61 – 180 months 4.62 hours 240 hours
181+ 6.15 hours 320 hours
Employees cease to accrue vacation once their maximum accrual limit has been reached 109
City of Yreka 5 Unrepresented Resolution
until accrued vacation is reduced below their maximum accrual limit.

The City Recognizes the following holidays:

Should December 24th fall on a Friday, December 23rd is observed as the holiday. Should December 25th fall on a Monday, December 26th is observed as the holiday.

Employee receives eighty (80) hours of paid administrative leave annually on the first full pay period in January. Upon hire employees will receive a prorated amount of administrative leave. Administrative leave must be used in the year that it is received or it will be forfeited by December 31.

Employees accrue three and sixty-nine hundredths (3.69) hours of paid sick leave per pay period.
110
City of Yreka 6 Unrepresented Resolution
Employees may take up to twenty-four (24) hours of paid bereavement leave for the death of an immediate family member. “Immediate family” consists of the following: employee’s:
spouse, domestic partner, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, mother/father-in-law, brother/sister-in-law, or has met the criteria for a loco parentis relationship.

Effective Date
This Resolution is effective January 8, 2023, and remains in effect until amended or superseded by the City Council.
111
City of Yreka 7 Unrepresented Resolution
Appendix “A” Application
Assistant City Manager
Chief of Police
Finance Director
Fire Chief
Human Resources Director
Lieutenant
Planning Director
Public Works Director
112
City of Yreka 8 Unrepresented Resolution
Appendix B – Salary Schedule
City of Yreka
Unrepresented Employees
For Period 1/8/2023 to 7/5/2025
Annual Salary Schedule – Effective 1/8/23 to 1/6/2024
Annual Salary Schedule – Effective 1/7/24 to 7/5/2025

JOB TITLE COLA RANGE STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E FINANCE DIRECTOR 1.04 2452 87,460.02 91,833.03 96,424.69 101,245.93 106,308.23 HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR 1.04 2452 87,460.02 91,833.03 96,424.69 101,245.93 106,308.23 PLANNING DIRECTOR 1.04 2452 87,460.02 91,833.03 96,424.69 101,245.93 106,308.23 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 1.04 2475 96,424.68 101,245.92 106,308.22 111,623.64 117,204.83 LIEUTENANT BM 2725 96,850.74 101,693.28 106,777.95 112,116.85 117,722.70 FIRE CHIEF 1.04 3050 105,154.78 110,412.52 115,933.15 121,729.81 127,816.31 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1.04 3058 109,144.84 114,602.09 120,332.20 126,348.81 132,666.26 CHIEF OF POLICE BM 3059 111,378.35 116,947.27 122,794.64 128,934.38 135,381.10

JOB TITLE COLA RANGE STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E FINANCE DIRECTOR 1.02 2452 89,209.23 93,669.70 98,353.19 103,270.85 108,434.40 HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR 1.02 2452 89,209.23 93,669.70 98,353.19 103,270.85 108,434.40 PLANNING DIRECTOR 1.02 2452 89,209.23 93,669.70 98,353.19 103,270.85 108,434.40 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 1.02 2475 98,353.18 103,270.84 108,434.39 113,856.11 119,548.92 LIEUTENANT BM 2725 100,724.77 105,761.01 111,049.07 116,601.53 122,431.61 FIRE CHIEF 1.02 3050 107,257.88 112,620.78 118,251.82 124,164.42 130,372.65 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1.02 3058 111,327.74 116,894.13 122,738.84 128,875.79 135,319.58 CHIEF OF POLICE BM 3059 115,833.49 121,625.17 127,706.43 134,091.76 140,796.35 113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA

APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT

AND UPDATING THE CITY'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

AND DEVELOPMENT IMP ACT FEE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 790 and 799, which implemented the City's Development Impact Fee program, and, which established the level of Development Impact Fees; and
WHEREAS, annually the City Council approves a Capital Improvement Plan for the construction of public facilities in the City as described in the City's Developer Impact Fee Study last updated December 21, 2021 Resolution 2021-58; WHEREAS, Yreka Municipal Code Section 11.23 .170 provides for an annual review of the Capital Improvement Plan, and provides for an annual review of both the City's Development Impact Fee Program and the balance of funds currently maintained in the City's various Development Impact Fee accounts; and
WHEREAS, Pace Engineering was engaged on Task Order 0069 .4 7 .183 to review the City's capital projects for water and wastewater needs, and identify those areas of growth after updating the respective master plans in 2019 and 2020, and in their report dated September 20, 2022 found the rates for water and wastewater to be deficient tn accounting for water and wastewater utility system impacts arising from growth.

WHEREAS, the proposed changes to the water and wastewater rates are reflected in the table below, to for identified capital improvements to the water and wastewater utility.

Current and Proposed DIF Comparison
Utility Current DIF Proposed DIF Difference Amounts Amounts Water System $7,391.07 $7,873.42 $482.35
Wastewater-Collection $2,140.12 $3,667.96 $1,527.84
Wastewater-Treatment $0.00 $5,940.60 $5,940.60
TOTALS: $9,531.19 $17,481.99 $7,950.80
WHEREAS, the documents reflecting the balance in each Development Impact Fee account, the fee, interest, and income and the amount of expenditure by public facility, and the amount of refunds made for the fiscal year have been available for public review as required by law; and
131
132
133
134
135
136

CITY OF YREKA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Prepared by: Juliana Lucchesi, AICP, Planning Director
Agenda Title: 13.a. HO-2022-01 Prohousing Designation Application Meeting date: December 20, 2022
Recommended Action:

Motion to approve Resolution CCR-2022-59 A Resolution of the City of Yreka City Council Authorizing Application to and Participation in the Prohousing Designation Program.

Summary:

City Staff has developed an application to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for a “Prohousing Designation”. The Prohousing Housing Designation identifies local policies that jurisdictions is adopting to address housing needs and affordability, and identifies State programs and grants for which Prohousing designated jurisdictions should receive preference or additional points. City Staff are requesting City Council review of the proposed activities to achieve a Pro Housing Designation and authorize the submittal of the application to HCD.

Background:

In an effort to address the housing crisis in the State of California, as part of the 2019-2022 Budget Act, the legislature enacted AB 101 and established the Prohousing Designation Program. The Prohousing Designation Program identifies local policies that jurisdictions should consider adopting to address housing needs and affordability, and identifies State programs and grants for which Prohousing designated jurisdictions should receive preference or additional points.

Per Section 65589.9(f)(2) of the California Government Code:
“Prohousing local policies” means policies that facilitate the planning, approval, or construction of housing. These policies may include, but are not limited to, the following:
(A) Local financial incentives for housing, including, but not limited to, establishing a local housing trust fund.
137
(B) Reduced parking requirements for sites that are zoned for residential development.
(C) Adoption of zoning allowing for use by right for residential and mixed-use development.
(D) Zoning more sites for residential development or zoning sites at higher densities than is required to accommodate the minimum existing regional housing need allocation for the current housing element cycle.
(E) Adoption of accessory dwelling unit ordinances or other mechanisms that reduce barriers for property owners to create accessory dwelling units beyond the requirements outlined in Section 65852.2, as determined by the department.
(F) Reduction of permit processing time.
(G) Creation of objective development standards. (H) Reduction of development impact fees.
(I) Establishment of a Workforce Housing Opportunity Zone, as defined in Section 65620, or a housing sustainability district, as defined in Section 66200.

Per Section 65589.9. of the California Government Code:
(a) It is the intent of the Legislature to create incentives for jurisdictions that are compliant with housing element requirements and have enacted prohousing local policies. It is the intent of the Legislature that these incentives be in the form of additional points or other preference in the scoring of competitive housing and infrastructure programs. It is the intent of the Legislature that, in adopting regulations related to prohousing local policy criteria, the department shall create criteria that consider the needs of rural, suburban, and urban jurisdictions and how those criteria may differ in those areas.
(b) For award cycles commenced after July 1, 2021, jurisdictions that have adopted a housing element that has been found by the department to be in substantial compliance with the requirements of this article pursuant to Section 65585, and that have been designated prohousing pursuant to subdivision
138
(c) based upon their adoption of prohousing local policies, shall be awarded additional points or preference in the scoring of program applications for the following programs:
(1) The Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program established by Part 1 (commencing with Section 75200) of Division 44 of the Public Resources Code.
(2) The Transformative Climate Communities Program established by Part 4 (commencing with Section 75240) of Division 44 of the Public Resources Code.
(3) The Infill Incentive Grant Program of 2007 established by Section 53545.13 of the Health and Safety Code.
(4) Additional bonus points may be awarded to other state programs when already allowable under state law.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact to apply for a Pro Housing Designation.

Council Discussion:

There are four scoring categories to evaluate jurisdictions under the Prohousing Designation:

1. Favorable Zoning and Land Use

2. Acceleration of Housing Production Timelines

3. Reduction of Construction and Development Cost

4. Providing Financial Subsidies
An additional category titled “Enhancement Factors” allows a jurisdiction to receive extra points for each qualifying Prohousing policy. For example, Enhancement Factor Category 4 is for “Policies that go beyond state law requirements in reducing displacement of lower income households and conserving existing housing stock that is affordable to lower income households.” Each City policy that works to achieve the goals of Enhancement Factor Category 4 may receive an additional point. However, a policy may not be double counted: if a policy has received points under one category, it cannot receive points in another category.

In order to receive a Prohousing designation, a jurisdiction must receive a minimum of 30 points. Existing and proposed policies may receive points. Staff has done a preliminary assessment of existing policies and those proposed in the Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element. The attached Preliminary Prohousing Score Sheet 139
details each of the categories eligible for points. Staff has calculated that the City of Yreka is likely to receive 45 points under the four Prohousing categories.

Attachment 2 identifies the categories, points possible, and points eligible based on programs in the draft Housing Element.

Staff Recommendation:

City Staff recommend the City Council discuss the draft scoring sheet for agreement with the proposed programs and approve the attached resolution to submit the application to HCD for review and approval.

City Council may add or remove programs in the application. If the Council adds programs then Staff will add programs to the Housing Element draft to support the initiative. The Council may remove programs as long as the total score does not fall below 30 points or a category is without any points; excluding the enhancement factors.

Attachments:

1. CCR-2022-59 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka Authorizing Application to and Participation in the Prohousing Designation Program.

2. Prohousing Designation Scoring Sheet
140
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-59

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA

AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO AND PARTICIPATION IN THE PROHOUSING

DESIGNATION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Government Code section 65589.9 established the Prohousing Designation Program (“PDP” or “Program”), which creates incentives for jurisdictions that are compliant with state housing element requirements and that have enacted Prohousing local policies; and WHEREAS, such jurisdictions will be designated Prohousing, and, as such, will receive additional points or other preference during the scoring of their competitive applications for specified housing and infrastructure funding; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) has adopted emergency regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) to implement the Program (“Program Regulations”), as authorized by Government Code section 65589.9, subdivision (d); and
WHEREAS, the City of Yreka (“Applicant”) desires to submit an application for a Prohousing Designation (“Application”).

THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT:

1. Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Department.

2. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it is currently in compliance with applicable state housing law.

3. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it will continue to comply with applicable housing laws and to refrain from enacting laws, developing policies, or taking other local governmental actions that may or do inhibit or constrain housing production. Examples of such local laws, policies, and action include moratoriums on development; local voter approval requirements related to housing production; downzoning; and unduly restrictive or onerous zoning regulations, development standards, or permit procedures. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that it commits itself to affirmatively furthering fair housing pursuant to Government Code section 8899.50.

4. If the Application is approved, Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to participate in the Program, and all amendments thereto (the “Program Documents”).

5. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the Application; the terms and conditions specified in the Program Documents; the Program Regulations; and any and all other applicable law.
141

6. The City Manager is authorized to execute and deliver the Application and the Program Documents on behalf of the Applicant for participation in the Program.

Passed and adopted this 20th day of December 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________
Corey Middleton, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk
142
Project Proposal
Category 1: Favorable Zoning and Land Use
Category Prohousing Policy Description Points Eligible
Points
1A Sufficient sites, including rezoning, to accommodate 150 percent or greater of the current or draft RHNA, whichever is greater, by total or income category.
3 3
1B Permitting missing middle housing uses (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) by right in existing low-density, single-family residential zones.
3 3
1C Sufficient sites, including rezoning, to accommodate 125 to 149 percent of the current or draft RHNA, whichever is greater, by total or income category. These points shall not be awarded if the applicant earns three points pursuant to Category (1)(A) above.
2 -
1D Density bonus programs which exceed statutory requirements by 10 percent or more.
2 2
1E Increasing allowable density in low-density, single-family residential areas beyond the requirements of state Accessory Dwelling Unit law (e.g., permitting more than one ADU or JADU per single-family lot).

These policies shall be separate from any qualifying policies under Category (1)(B) above.
2 -
1F Reducing or eliminating parking requirements for residential development as authorized by Government Code sections 65852.2; adopting vehicular parking ratios that are less than the relevant ratio thresholds at subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of Government Code section 65915, subdivision (p)(1); or adopting maximum parking requirements at or less than ratios pursuant to Government Code section 65915, subdivision (p).
2 2
1G Zoning to allow for residential or mixed uses in one or more nonresidential zones (e.g., commercial, light industrial). Qualifying nonresidential zones do not include open space or substantially similar zones.
1 1
1H Modification of development standards and other applicable zoning provisions to promote greater development intensity. Potential areas of focus include floor area ratio; height limits; minimum lot or unit sizes; setbacks; and allowable dwelling units per acre. These policies must be separate from any qualifying policies under Category (1)(B) above.
1 -
143
1I Establishment of a Workforce Housing Opportunity Zone, as defined in Government Code section 65620, or a housing sustainability district, as defined in Government Code section 66200.
1 -
1J Demonstrating other zoning and land use actions that measurably support the Acceleration of Housing Production.
1 -
TOTALS 18 11
144
Project Proposal
Category 2: Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes Category Prohousing Policy Description Points Eligible
Points
2A Establishment of ministerial approval processes for a variety of housing types, including single-family and multifamily housing. 3 3
2B Establishment of streamlined, program-level CEQA analysis and certification of general plans, community plans, specific plans with accompanying Environmental Impact Reports (EIR), and related documents.
2 2
2C Documented practice of streamlining housing development at the project level, such as by enabling a by-right approval process or by utilizing statutory and categorical exemptions as authorized by applicable law (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21155.1, 21155.4, 21159.24, 21159.25; Gov. Code, § 65457; Cal Code Regs., tit. 14, §§ 15303, 15332; Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21094.5, 21099, 21155.2, 21159.28).
2 2
2D Establishment of permit processes that take less than four months.

Policies under this Category (2)(D) must address all approvals necessary to issue building permits.
2 -
2E Absence or elimination of public hearings for projects consistent with zoning and the general plan.
2 2
2F Establishment of consolidated or streamlined permit processes that minimize the levels of review and approval required for projects, and that are consistent with zoning regulations and the general plan.
1 1
2G Absence, elimination or replacement of subjective development and design standards with objective development and design standards that simplify zoning clearance and improve approval certainty and timing.
1 1
2H Establishment of one-stop-shop permitting processes or a single point of contact where entitlements are coordinated across city approval functions (e.g., planning, public works, building) from entitlement application to certificate of occupancy.
1 1
2I Priority permit processing or reduced plan check times for ADUs/JADUs, multifamily housing, or homes affordable to lower- or moderate-income households.
1 1
145
2J Establishment of a standardized application form for all entitlement applications.
1 1
2K Practice of publicly posting status updates on project permit approvals on the Internet.
1 1
2L Limitation on the total number of hearings for any project to three or fewer. Applicants that accrue points pursuant to Category (2)(E) are not eligible for points under this Category (2)(L).
1 1
2M Demonstration of other actions, not listed above, that quantifiably decrease production timeframes or promote the streamlining of approval processes.
1 -
TOTAL 19 16
146
Project Proposal
Category 3: Reduction of Construction and Development Costs Category Prohousing Policy Description Points Eligible
Points
3A Waiver or significant reduction of development impact fees for residential development.
3 3
3B Adoption of ordinances or implementation of other mechanisms that result in less restrictive requirements than Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 to reduce barriers for property owners to create ADUs/JADUs. Examples of qualifying policies include, but are not limited to, development standards improvements, permit processing improvements, dedicated ADU/JADU staff, technical assistance programs, and pre-approved ADU/JADU design
packages.
2 2
3C Adoption of other fee reduction strategies separate from Category (3)(A) above, including fee deferrals and reduced fees for housing for persons with special needs.
1 -
3D Promoting innovative housing types (e.g., manufactured homes, recreational vehicles, park models) that reduce development costs. 1 1
3E Measures that reduce costs for transportation-related infrastructure or programs that encourage active modes of transportation or other alternatives to automobiles. Qualifying policies include, but are not limited to, publicly funded programs to expand sidewalks or protect bike/micro-mobility lanes; creation of on-street parking for bikes; transit-related improvements; or establishment of carshare programs. 1 1
3F Adoption of universal design ordinances pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17959.
1 1
3G Establishment of pre-approved or prototype plans for missing middle housing types (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) in lowdensity, single-family residential areas. 1 -
3H Demonstration of other actions, not listed above, that quantifiably reduce construction or development costs.
1 -
TOTAL 11 8
147
Project Proposal
Category 4: Providing Financial Subsidies
Category Prohousing Policy Description Points Eligible
Points
4A Establishment of local housing trust funds or collaboration on a regional housing trust fund.
2 -
4B Provide grants or low-interest loans for ADU/JADU construction affordable to lower- and moderate-income households.
2 -
4C A comprehensive program that complies with the Surplus Land Act (Gov. Code, § 54220 et seq.) and that makes publicly owned land available for affordable housing, or for multifamily housing projects with the highest feasible percentage of units affordable to lower income households. A qualifying program may utilize mechanisms such as land donations, land sales with significant write-downs, or belowmarket land leases. 2 2
4D Establishment of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District or similar local financing tool that, to the extent feasible, directly supports housing developments in an area where at least 20 percent of the residences will be affordable to lower income households. 2 -
4E Directed residual redevelopment funds to affordable housing. 1 - 4F Development and regular (at least biennial) use of a housing subsidy pool, local or regional trust fund, or other similar funding source. 1 -
4G Prioritization of local general funds for affordable housing. 1 1 4H Demonstration of other actions, not listed above, that quantifiably promote, develop, or leverage financial resources for housing. 1 -
TOTAL 12 3
148
Project Proposal
Enhancement Factors
Category Prohousing Policy Description Points Eligible
Points
1 Policy that represents one element of a unified, multi-faceted strategy to promote multiple planning objectives, such as efficient land use, access to public transportation, affordable housing, climate change solutions, and/or hazard mitigation.
2 2
2 Policies that promote development consistent with the state planning priorities pursuant to Government Code section 65041.1. 1 1
3 Policies that diversify planning and target community and economic development investments (housing and non-housing) to improve lower opportunity areas. Such areas include, but are not limited to, Low Resource and High Segregation & Poverty areas designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps, and
disadvantaged communities pursuant to California Senate Bill 535 (2012).
1 1
4 Policies that go beyond state law requirements in reducing displacement of lower income households and conserving existing housing stock that is affordable to lower income households. 1 1
5 Rezoning and other policies that support high-density development in Location Efficient Communities.
1 1
6 Rezoning and other policies that result in a net gain of housing capacity while concurrently mitigating development impacts on or from Environmentally Sensitive or Hazardous Areas.
1 1
7 Zoning policies that increase housing choices and affordability in High Resource and Highest Resource areas, as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps.
1 -
8 Other policies that involve meaningful actions towards affirmatively furthering fair housing pursuant to Government Code section 8899.50, including, but not limited to, outreach campaigns, updated zoning codes, and expanded access to financing support.
1 -
TOTAL 9 7
149

CITY OF YREKA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Prepared by:

Agenda Title:

Meeting date:

Juliana Lucchesi, Planning Director, AICP

13.b. Regional Early Action Program (REAP) 2.0 Grant
Application
December 20, 2022
Recommended Action:

1. Open public input to collect project activities from the public

2. Discuss potential projects

3. Motion to approve Resolution 2022-60 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka Authorizing the City Manager to Submit a REAP 2.0 Grant Application on Behalf of the City of Yreka with Selected Project Activities
Summary:

Regional Early Action Program (REAP) 2.0 is a flexible program that seeks to accelerate progress towards our state housing goals and climate commitments through a strengthened partnership between the state, its regions, and local entities. REAP 2.0 seeks to accelerate infill housing development, reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), increase housing supply at all affordability levels, affirmatively further fair housing, and facilitate the implementation of adopted regional and local plans to achieve these goals.

REAP 2.0 will be administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in collaboration with the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), the Strategic Growth Council (SGC), and the California Air Resources Board (CARB).

The City of Yreka is preparing a grant application to be submitted prior to the December 31, 2022, grant deadline. This agenda item is to solicit grant application activities from the public, approve grant activities, and approve the necessary resolution to submit the grant activities under the Rural and Tribal Applicants grant pool.

Eligible Activities:

Eligible activities that could be funded by the REAP 2.0 grant would fall under four categories:
150

1. Accelerating infill development that facilities housing supply, diversity, choice, and affordability through various planning and investment;

2. Realizing multimodal communities through programs, plans, and implementation actions;

3. Shifting travel behavior by reducing driving through programs, ordinances, funds, and other mechanisms; and

4. Increasing transit ridership through funding, implementation actions, and planning.

Within each of these categories, eligible activities include rezoning, environmental clearance to eliminate project-specific review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), establishing a vision-zero or slow streets program, developing bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure plans and policies, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impact fees, or funding of regional transit systems.

Ineligible activities include plans, policies, or programs that would increase roadway capacity, ongoing city expenses, costs associated with increasing automobile parking, or street construction to benefit vehicular traffic.

Fiscal Impact:

The REAP 2.0 grant is a no-match grant that can fund a maximum of 5% of indirect costs. The indirect costs of the grant would be invoicing and grant reporting throughout the life of the grant. The city is expending general fund dollars to prepare the grant application with Precision Civil Engineering, Inc.’s assistance.

Timeline:

The REAP 2.0 grant application is due to HCD by December 31, 2022. The grant term would begin in Fall of 2023 but can retroactively reimburse activities beginning July 1, 2023. The grant funds would be available until June 30, 2026.

Review by Public & Outside Agencies:

A condition of the REAP 2.0 grant application is to conduct outreach to underserved groups within the community. The city published both English and Spanish notices for public comment on the potential project activities beginning December 5, 2022. Notices were placed on the city’s website, at city hall, on the city’s social media page, and posted in the Siskiyou Daily newspaper.

The December 20, 2022, public City Council meeting includes time to submit public ideas for the grant application. Comments could also be mailed or emailed to city hall prior to the meeting.
151
Staff Recommendation:

City staff in collaboration with Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. (city’s on-call planning contractor) have prepared two recommended activities for the REAP

2.0 grant application:

1. Comprehensive update to the City’s zoning, development, and subdivision regulations

2. Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for General Plan and code updates
The first recommendation would comprehensively update Titles 11, 15, and 16 to meet state mandates, collect public input on changes they would like to see in the code, and update the code to be consistent with the updated General Plan.

The second recommendation would be a PEIR that would analyze the General Plan and code updates. The PEIR could also include specific vacant properties that could be developed for mixed-use and housing developments. This would eliminate the need for site specific environmental compliance and streamline development on these properties.

Council Actions:

The City Council should open the public comment section of this item to solicit ideas or support from the public on grant activities. Council should then agree to the proposed activities either recommended by staff or amend the activities to include other items. Finally, City Council may approve the proposed resolution to apply for the proposed activities and authorize the City Manager to sign the grant application and all subsequent grant documents.

If the City Council does not wish to apply for the grant dollars, Council may choose to take no action on this item.

Attachments:

1. City Council Resolution 2022-60 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka Authorizing the City Manager to Submit a REAP 2.0 Grant Application on Behalf of the City of Yreka with Selected Project Activities

2. REAP 2.0 Grant Guidelines
152
CITY OF YREKA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-60

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF YREKA AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO THE

REGIONAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING GRANT
PROGRAM (REAP 2.0) AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO SIGN ALL DOCUMENTS

NECESSARY TO THE EXECUTION OF THIS GRANT

PROGRAM
All of the City Council Members of the City of Yreka (“Applicant”) hereby consents to, adopts and ratifies the following resolution:

A. WHEREAS, the Department is authorized to provide up to $30,000,000 to Rural Entities (“Applicant”) listed in Health and Safety Code Section 50515.08, subdivisions (a)(1)-(6) under the Regional Early Action Planning grants program (REAP 2.0), as detailed in Health and Safety Code Section 50515.08-10.

B. WHEREAS the State of California (the “State”), Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) issued a Notice of Funding Availability on July 26, 2022 for REAP 2.0 grants available to Rural Entities;
C. WHEREAS Applicant is a Rural Entity eligible to submit a Request for Funds pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 50515.08(c) to develop and accelerate the implementation of the requirements described in Health and Safety Code section 50515.08(c)(1).

D. WHEREAS the Department shall approve the Request for Funds, subject to the terms and conditions of Eligibility, Guidelines, NOFAs, Program requirements, and the Standard Agreement by and between the Department and REAP 2.0 Grant Recipients; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. The City of Yreka is hereby authorized and directed to request an allocation of funds not to exceed $ 287,849.10 (the amount allocated pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 50515.07(a) consistent with the methodology described in 50515.09(a)).

2. The City Manager is authorized to execute the Request for Funds, on behalf of the City of Yreka as required by the Department for receipt of REAP 2.0 funds.

3. When City of Yreka receives an allocation of REAP 2.0 funds in the authorized amount of $ 287,849.10 from the Department pursuant to the above referenced Request for Funds, it represents and certifies that it will use all such funds only for eligible activities as set forth in Health and Safety Code section 50515.08(c)(1), as approved by the Department and in accordance with all REAP 2.0 requirements, guidelines, all applicable state and federal statutes, rules, regulations, and the Standard Agreement executed by and between the Applicant, City of Yreka, and the Department.
153

4. The City Manager is authorized to enter into, execute, and deliver a State of California Standard Agreement for the amount of $287,849.10, and any and all other documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to evidence and secure the REAP 2.0 Allocation, the City of Yreka obligations related thereto and all amendments the Department deems necessary and in accordance with REAP 2.0.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of City of Yreka this 20th day of December 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________
Corey Middleton, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Shella Rhetta Hogan
City Clerk
154

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIVISION OF POLICY DEVELOPMENT
2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500, 95833
P. O. Box 952054
Sacramento, CA 94252-2054
(916) 263-2771 / FAX (916) 263-2763
www.hcd.ca.gov
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor July 26, 2022
MEMORANDUM FOR: All Potential Applicants
FROM: Megan Kirkeby, Deputy Director, Division of Housing Policy Development
SUBJECT: Notice of Funding Availability and Final Guidelines - Tribal and Rural Allocation of the Regional Early Action Planning Grant Program (REAP 2.0)
The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), in collaboration with the Office of Planning and Research (OPR), the Strategic Growth Council (SGC), and the State Air Resources Board (CARB), is pleased to release this Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for approximately $30,000,000 for the Tribal and Rural Allocation of the Regional Early Action Planning Grant Program of 2021 (REAP

2.0). The principal goal of REAP 2.0 is to make funding available to Tribal and Rural Entities for Transformative Planning and Implementation Activities that meet Housing and equity goals and reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Per Capita.

REAP 2.0 funding will be released in three separate allocations: (1) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Direct Allocation, (2) Tribal and Rural Allocation and (3) Higher Impact Transformative Allocation. This Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) of approximately $30,000,000 addresses the (2) Tribal and Rural Allocation and is released concurrently with the (1) MPO Direct Allocation. The (3) Higher Impact Transformative Allocation NOFA is anticipated at a later time in 2022. The following Guidelines address allocations for the Tribal and Rural Allocation and are made available as a portion of the Local Government Planning Support Grants Program pursuant to Chapter 3.15 of Health and Safety Code (Sections 50515.06 to 50515.10) (Chapter 111, Statutes of 2021).

In order to be eligible for grant funding, the applicant must submit a copy by email to:

[email protected]. For the (2) Tribal and Rural Allocation, applications will be accepted on a competitive basis as of the date of this NOFA through December 31, 2022. The Department encourages early applications.

The Department plans to provide additional technical assistance to Tribal Entity applicants to assist with application preparation. Applications submitted by Tribal Entities for the Tribal Entities allocation (See Guidelines Section 404(A)(6)) are subject to an over-the-counter application review process until the final application deadline on December 31, 2022. Upon the Department’s initial review of an application from a Tribal Entity, if Threshold Requirements are not met, the applicant may return a revised application within 30 days of the Department’s communication of initial review findings.

REAP 2.0 applications, forms, and instructions are available on the Department’s website on the REAP webpage. If you have questions regarding this NOFA, please 155
email the Department at [email protected]. For future notifications, please use the Department’s email notification sign up at Subscribe (ca.gov). 156
Tribal and Rural Allocation
Regional Early Action
Planning Grants of 2021
(REAP 2.0)
FinalGuidelinesforthe Tribal and Rural Allocation
State of California
Governor Gavin Newsom
July 2022
Website: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-funding/active-funding/reap2.shtml Email: [email protected]
157
Table of Contents
Section 100: Introduction ....................................................................................................... 5 Section 101: Program Background........................................................................................ 5 Section 102: Scope and Authority ......................................................................................... 6 Section 200: Program Goals, Objectives, Threshold Requirements and Eligible Uses .... 6 Section 201: Program Goals................................................................................................... 6 Section 202: Program Objectives .......................................................................................... 7 Section 203: Threshold Requirements ................................................................................... 8 Section 204: Eligible Uses....................................................................................................11 Section 205: Ineligible Uses ................................................................................................. 14 Section 300: Applicant and Application Provisions ...........................................................15 Section 301: Application Requirements and Contents .......................................................15 Section 302: Application Submittal......................................................................................16 Section 400: Tribal and Rural Allocation.............................................................................16 Section 401: Eligible Applicants ..........................................................................................16 Section 402: Award Amounts...............................................................................................17 Section 403: Application Review .........................................................................................17 Section 404: Geographic Distribution .................................................................................18 Section 405: Suballocations................................................................................................. 19 Section 406: Scoring Criteria ...............................................................................................19 Section 500: Administration................................................................................................. 21 Section 501: Grant Execution and Term..............................................................................21 Section 502: Accounting and Records................................................................................21 Section 503: Invoicing ..........................................................................................................22 Section 504: Audits...............................................................................................................22 Section 505: Remedies of Non-performance ......................................................................23 Section 506: Reporting .........................................................................................................24 Section 600: Right to Modify or Suspend Guidelines and Final Decision Making...........24 Attachment 1: Statute ...........................................................................................................26 Attachment 2: Definitions .....................................................................................................37 Attachment 3: Award Amounts by Eligible Applicant ........................................................41 Attachment 4: Applying Units of Measurement..................................................................42 158
5 Section 100: Introduction
The REAP 2.0 Program is funded in the amount of $600 million from the State General Fund. The Regional Early Action Planning Grants of 2021 will be administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), in collaboration with the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), the Strategic Growth Council (SGC), and the California Air Resources Board (CARB). (Referred hereafter collectively as “State Collaborative Partners”.)
Five percent of the funds have been set aside for the Tribal and Rural Allocation, and an additional five percent has been set aside for the Higher Impact Transformative Allocation under a separate NOFA to be released later in 2022. A majority of the funds (85 percent) will be allocated directly to the state’s Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) under a separate NOFA released concurrently with the Tribal and Rural Allocation.

Section 101: Program Background
California is committed to a future where we all have the option to live closer to our jobs, services, and daily destinations fostered through more Housing options and affordability in nearby neighborhoods which include transportation options so we can walk our kids to school, ride our bikes to work, or take transit. REAP 2.0 is a key part of the state’s strategic investments toward this more sustainable, resilient, and inclusive future for people in all areas of the state.

REAP 2.0 builds on the success of 2019’s REAP program but expands the focus by integrating Housing and climate goals, and allowing for broader planning and implementation investments, including infrastructure investments that support future Housing development. REAP 2.0 is explicitly intended to meet multiple objectives – Infill Development, Housing for all incomes, Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) reduction, and Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing in ways that lead to transformative Policy Outcomes and accelerate the implementation of regional and local plans to achieve these goals.

REAP 2.0 provides funds to Tribal and Rural Entities to accelerate Housing production and, where appropriate, facilitate compliance with the 6th Housing Element cycle, including Regional Housing Needs Assessment. In addition, REAP 2.0 is specifically designed to provide Tribal and Rural Entities with tools and resources to help implement and advance eligible uses that meet Program requirements.

Eligible Entities are encouraged to examine and consider land use and transportation strategies adopted by Metropolitan Planning Organizations in Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCSs). A Tribal or Rural Entity is not required to prepare an SCS, however, a region’s Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) includes planning, policies, investments, and other supporting implementation actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by reducing VMT, and therefore, may be a helpful resource to Eligible Entities when applying to the REAP 2.0 Program.
159
6 Section 102: Scope and Authority
These Guidelines are authorized pursuant to Chapter 3.15 of Health and Safety Code sections 50515.06 to 50515.10 and implements, interprets, and makes statute specific for purposes of implementing REAP 2.0. These Guidelines establish terms, conditions, forms, procedures, and other mechanisms as the Department deems necessary to exercise the powers and perform the duties conferred by Chapter 3.15.

The matters set forth herein are regulatory mandates, and are adopted in accordance with the authorities set forth below:

Quasi-legislative regulations … have the dignity of statutes … [and]… delegation of legislative authority includes the power to elaborate the meaning of key statutory terms…
Ramirez v. Yosemite Water Co., 20 Cal. 4th 785, 800 (1999).

Further, the Department and State Collaborative Partners may implement REAP 2.0 through the issuance of forms, guidelines, and one or more NOFAs, as the Department deems necessary, to exercise the powers and perform the duties conferred on it by this Chapter 3.15 of Health and Safety Code. Any forms, guidelines, and NOFAs adopted pursuant to this section 50515.10 are specifically exempted from the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Gov. Code). (Health and Safety Code section 50515.10, (h).)
The Department reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to suspend or amend the provisions of these Guidelines in collaboration with the State Collaborative Partners, including, but not limited to, grant award amounts.

Section 200: Program Goals, Objectives, Threshold
Requirements and Eligible Uses
Section 201: Program Goals
Program goals include:

Invest in Housing, planning, and Infill Housing-supportive infrastructure across the entire state in a manner that reduces VMT, increases Housing affordability, and advances equity, consistent with all of the following:
(A) Advancing the State Planning Priorities, as described in Section 65041.1 of the Government Code;
(B) Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) pursuant to Section 8899.50 of the Government Code;
(C) Where applicable, facilitating Housing Element compliance and progress for the sixth cycle Regional Housing Needs Assessment pursuant to Section 65302 of the Government Code prepared in accordance with Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code. 160
7 Section 202: Program Objectives
Program Objectives include:
(A) Accelerating Infill Development that Facilitates Housing Supply, Choice, and Affordability

1. Accelerating Infill development near jobs and other key destinations to support increasing Housing choices and affordability that effectively reduce VMT and greenhouse gas emissions.

2. Eligible Entities must describe how Proposed Uses prioritize development that increases Housing choice and affordability at infill sites. Proposed Uses must have strong Housing affordability components that serve Lower and Moderate-income Households.

3. Affordable Housing development programs – which may involve predevelopment costs (e.g., studies, land acquisition and entitlements), large expenditures and capital investments – are eligible uses if the programs accelerate the supply of long-term Affordable Housing for Lower and moderate-income Households, remove barriers to encourage development and commit to development within a reasonable time frame (e.g., within 5 years of expenditure deadline).
(B) Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)

1. Proposed Uses must combat discrimination, overcome patterns of segregation, and foster equitable and inclusive communities.

2. Proposed Uses must include meaningful actions, that taken together, address significant disparities in Housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, and transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity pursuant to Government Code section 8899.50.

3. Proposed uses must support regional and local efforts that work towards ensuring all people have full and equal access to opportunities enabling them to lead healthy lives.

4. Actions to AFFH may include, but are not limited to:
i. Enhancing Housing mobility strategies that remove barriers to Housing, infrastructure, and transportation in areas of opportunity. ii. Encouraging development of new Affordable Housing in high resource areas that promotes Housing, infrastructure, increased transportation choices, and affordability in areas of high opportunity outside areas of concentrated poverty.
iii. Improving place-based strategies to encourage community revitalization. This includes preservation of existing Affordable Housing that involves approaches focused on conserving and improving assets in areas of lower opportunity and concentrated poverty, such as targeted investments in neighborhood revitalization, preserving or rehabilitating existing Affordable Housing, improving infrastructure, schools, employment, parks, transportation, and other community amenities.
iv. Protecting existing residents from displacement and preserving 161
8 Housing choices and affordability in areas of lower or moderate opportunity and concentrated poverty.

5. Eligible Entities are required to consider AFFH principles and equity in all Proposed Uses. Any Proposed Uses that may have a negative impact on AFFH objectives must have appropriate mitigation efforts. Recipients shall take no action that is materially inconsistent with AFFH.

6. Eligible Entities are required to pursue geographic equity in how the application(s) disburse funding across the region or a broad impact area.

7. Eligible Entities shall target funding to benefit Disadvantaged and Historically Underserved Communities or Low- and Moderate-Income Households.

8. Suballocations must address local, unique equity priorities. (C) Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled

1. The REAP 2.0 program provides for investments to support Housing planning and production in Infill areas that reduce VMT towards helping the state meet multiple goals. Eligible Entities must explain how each Proposed Use promotes development and aligns Housing production in Infill locations consistent with the state’s climate targets and goals discussed in the California Climate Change Scoping Plan.

2. Eligible Entities must explain how Proposed Uses support or implement action-oriented plans, policies, and investment strategies broadly described as:
i. Land Use Planning, Policies, and Investment Strategies: Encourage Infill development that facilitates Housing supply, choice and affordability and located in infill areas serviced by existing or planned-for expansions of a multimodal transportation system. ii. Transportation Planning, Policies, and Investment Strategies:

Increase travel options to homes, jobs, services, and other key destinations that provide, support, or enhance Multimodal Communities and reduce the number or length of vehicle trips.

3. Eligible Entities are encouraged to pursue uses that support new Housing development and shift travel away from driving by implementing or supporting pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and other alternative transportation programs.

Section 203: Threshold Requirements
(A) Significant Beneficial Impact

1. Applicants must demonstrate each Proposed Use advances all Program goals and objectives, meets the definition of a Transformative Planning and Implementation Activity, and provides a significant beneficial impact.

2. Significant beneficial impacts must lead to substantial changes in land use patterns and travel behaviors. In demonstrating significant beneficial impacts, applicants may consider rates of change (e.g., percent increase over a baseline), the magnitude of impact relative to variables or targets, the proportion of need achieved, and the impact relative to past trends, 162
9 policies, and practices. Variables or targets may include but are not limited to benefitting households by income group; Regional Housing Needs Assessment; Housing units (new construction, preservation/conservation, and rehabilitation); density; infrastructure; infrastructure capacity and accessibility; public space; community amenities; investments; VMT reduction goals or targets; regional or local equity policies and programs included in applicable regional transportation plans; and regional or local GHG reduction goals or targets.

3. Applicants must explain how each Proposed Use demonstrates a nexus to all REAP 2.0 objectives through Policy Outcomes, provide a reasonable and verifiable methodology, and utilize forms in a manner prescribed by the Department and State Collaborative Partners.

4. Proposed Uses may combine eligible uses. Combined eligible uses must demonstrate a reasonable relationship to each other, including timing and completion.

5. Proposed Uses may combine eligible uses with other non-REAP 2.0 efforts including planning and implementation (e.g., other funding sources).

Proposed Uses that combine eligible uses with non-REAP 2.0 efforts must demonstrate a reasonable relationship to each other, including timing and completion.

6. Where instructed, applicants must provide clear evidence that demonstrates a nexus between each Proposed Use and REAP 2.0 Program objectives, utilizing numeric metrics, targets, outputs, or other units of measurement that can be measured and evaluated as defined by these Guidelines (See Attachment 4: Examples of Units of Measurement).

Applicants may propose other units of measurement in consultation with the Department and State Collaborative Partners; such other measurements may be subject to a greater level of scrutiny.
(B) Equitable Targeted Outreach

1. Eligible Entities must conduct outreach as part of the development of their application for funds and implementation of Proposed Uses.

2. Eligible Entities must use outreach to develop priorities, Proposed Uses and amounts, the blend of planning and implementation uses, the amount retained by the Eligible Entity versus suballocations, and various other Program components.

3. Outreach must proactively employ a variety of methods. Eligible Entities must conduct and must document targeted outreach to Disadvantaged and Historically Underserved Communities, including Tribal Entities.

4. Eligible Entities shall explain how outreach was incorporated into the application and explain how the Proposed Uses reflect the input received.

Eligible Entities are encouraged to provide responses to stakeholder and public input to provide for transparency and demonstrate how input was incorporated into planning and implementation activities.

5. Eligible Entities must use a variety of methods to reach individuals and organizations representing pertinent interests such as Housing, transportation, infrastructure, climate change, Infill development and equity.

Methods may consider community-based surveys and participatory 163
10 research, advisory or shared decision-making bodies, interviews, focus groups, community and stakeholder meetings, public and quasi-public meetings, community benefit agreements, and committees with representatives of pertinent special interests and neighborhoods.

6. Eligible Entities must make draft approaches available to the public with sufficient time (e.g., at least 21 days) to comment.

7. Eligible Entities must conduct outreach throughout the Program development and implementation process. This includes outreach in advance of developing Proposed Uses and approaches, in the early stages of Program development, throughout Program development, and through implementation.

8. Eligible Entities must employ outreach that is unique to the REAP 2.0 Program. Eligible Entities may utilize closely related outreach efforts but must not solely rely on those efforts.

9. Outreach methods must consider language access and other potential barriers to providing input.

10. Outreach may include coordination with other Eligible Entities (including Tribal Entities) within the same region or in other regions. Eligible Entities may wish to consider the potential for joint activities and the coordination of Housing and transportation planning across regions.

11. Outreach must include effective and meaningful methods to gather and consider input and partnership with Tribal Entities. Methods must demonstrate a diligent effort to consult with Tribal Entities. Examples include acknowledgement of outreach, demonstration of consultation and incorporation of Tribal interest in priority setting and Proposed Uses.

12. REAP 2.0 Requirements are subject to AB 1010 (Chapter 660, Statutes of 2019), which is set forth in HSC section 50406, subdivision (p). Accordingly, and pursuant to HSC section 50406, subdivision (p), (1) where the provisions of tribal law, tribal governance, tribal charter, or difference in tribal entity or legal structure would cause a violation or not satisfy the requirements of these Guidelines, said requirements may be modified as necessary to ensure Program compatibility; and (2) where provisions of tribal law, tribal governance, tribal charter, or difference in tribal entity legal structure or agency create minor inconsistencies (as determined by the Director of the Department or a duly authorized designee thereof) with the requirements set forth in these Guidelines the Department may waive said requirements, as deemed necessary, to avoid an unnecessary administrative burden. Matters set forth or otherwise provided for in these Guidelines that may be modified or waived include, without limitation, threshold scoring requirements and any other matters set forth in HSC section 50406, subdivision (p)(2). Tribal Applicants are accordingly encouraged to discuss any such potential modifications or waivers and their options in that regard during any pre-application technical assistance communications or meetings. Tribal applicants should be aware that AB 1010 cannot be used to modify or waive Federal REAP 2.0 statutory and regulatory requirements.
164
11 Section 204: Eligible Uses
(A) Activities generally may include:

1. Technical assistance, planning, staffing, consultant needs (Programrelated),

2. Administration costs (see 204(J)),

3. Outreach and engagement activities (see 204(I)),

4. Eligible uses described in 204(E) that meet one or more of the following categories of allowable uses:
i. Accelerating Infill development that facilitates Housing supply, choice, and affordability through various planning and investment, ii. Realizing Multimodal Communities through programs, plans, and implementation actions,
iii. Shifting travel behavior by reducing driving through programs, ordinances, funds, and other mechanisms, and
iv. Increasing transit ridership through funding, implementation actions, and planning.
(B) In consultation with the Department and State Collaborative Partners, applicants may determine the blend of planning and implementation activities. The blend of planning and implementation may consider the extent to which planning needs remain in the region after other local, state, and federal planning investments, including but not limited to REAP 1.0, SB 2 Planning Grants, LEAP, SB 1 Sustainable Communities Grants and Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) Local Homelessness Actions plans. The blend of planning and implementation may also consider Housing and infrastructure needs of the communities and overall region, consideration of outreach and priority setting, including to disadvantaged communities, overall impact of proposed projects on Housing production, VMT reduction, and AFFH. Applicants that dedicate at least 70% of funding to implementation activities are generally not subject to consultation with the Department and State Collaborative Partners regarding the blend of planning and implementation activities.
(C) The collection of eligible uses in the application should be integrated wherever possible and should lead to greater impact when implemented together. (D) Eligible uses may be coupled with other verifiable and related activities being undertaken that will be completed by the applicant or in coordination with other Entities as demonstrated by a formal written agreement or other documentation (e.g., resolution) to the satisfaction of the Department. (E) Eligible uses could include but are not limited to:

1. Accelerating Infill development that facilitates Housing supply, choice, and affordability:
i. Affordable Housing development programs – which may involve predevelopment costs (e.g., studies, land acquisition and 165
12 entitlements), large expenditures and capital investments – are eligible uses if the programs accelerate the supply of long-term Affordable Housing for Lower-Income and Moderate-Income Households in Infill areas, remove barriers to encourage development and commit to development within a reasonable time frame (e.g., within 5 years of the expenditure deadline). Affordable Housing developments can include mixed-uses (e.g., a minimum of 50% total floor area is residential use), and Affordable Housing units that are part of mixed income development programs.
ii. Rezoning and guiding development by updating planning documents, development standards, and zoning ordinances, including general plans, community plans, and specific plans, and local coastal programs. All uses that include the creation of planning documents must be accompanied by a commitment to adopt and implement. Completion and adoption of any planning documents or ordinances must occur by the expenditure deadline.
iii. Revamping local planning processes to accelerate Infill development that facilitates Housing supply, choice, and affordability. iv. Completing environmental clearance to eliminate the need for project-specific review for Infill development that facilitates Housing supply, choice, and affordability.
v. Establishing and funding an Affordable Housing catalyst fund, Housing Trust Fund, or revolving loan fund for location efficient projects.
vi. Performing infrastructure planning and investing in upgrading infrastructure, including but not limited to sewers, water systems, transit, active transportation, roads that do not induce additional vehicle demand, or other public facilities necessary to enable reduction in Per Capita VMT and accelerate Infill development that facilitates Housing supply, choice, and affordability.

2. Realizing Multimodal Communities:
i. Establishing and implementing a vision-zero policy and program, a safety plan, and a slow streets program.
ii. Developing bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure plans and other multimodal plans or policies.
iii. Investing in infrastructure projects and other programs to expand active transportation and implement bicycle or pedestrian plans. iv. Producing multimodal corridor studies associated with developing specific planning documents or implementation actions.

3. Shifting travel behavior through reducing driving through mechanisms that support active transportation or increase transit ridership:
i. Studying roadway pricing feasibility and implementing road pricing programs.
ii. Funding the establishment of a local VMT impact fee or catalyzing a regional VMT mitigation bank (seed funding for 166
13 mitigation is ineligible).
iii. Funding and implementing parking and transportation demand management programs or ordinances.
iv. Accelerating Infill Housing production near jobs, transit, and resources.

4. Increasing transit ridership:
i. Funding and implementing actions to establish more
seamless regional transit systems between and across
communities, including establishing common fares,
systems, sync transit routing systems and schedules,
service design, and wayfinding to connect residential
neighborhoods with employment centers and other
key destinations.
ii. Developing and implementing multimodal access
plans to and from transit facilities.
iii. Planning for additional Housing near transit. All uses that include the creation of planning documents must
be accompanied by a commitment to adopt by the
expenditure deadline.
(F) Eligible activities under technical assistance may be broadly construed but must demonstrate a clear and significant nexus to all REAP 2.0 objectives. (G) Eligible activities, as a whole, must have a significant geographic or region-wide benefit; awards are not intended to fund projects that are relatively small in scope. (H) Tribal Entities may propose eligible uses on all types of Tribal Lands located within the state of California, as long as site control is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Department.

1. To demonstrate site control, Tribal Entity Applicants should consider the following criteria:
i. Project occupancy will be limited to tribal households to the greatest extent possible; and
ii. The Applicant meets the following conditions of award funding to the extent applicable, and, subject to any modifications or waivers as provided for in HSC Section 50406, subdivision (p) (Assembly Bill 1010 (Chapter 660, Statutes of 2019) that shall be set forth in a Standard Agreement. It is noted that these same conditions do not need to be satisfied initially to engage in the competitive award process.
a. BIA Consent. The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) has
consented to the Applicant’s execution and recordation (as applicable) of all Department required documents that are subject to 25 CFR Section 152.34 or 25 CFR Section 162.12, prior to award disbursement.
b. Personal and Subject Matter jurisdiction. Personal and subject matter jurisdiction in regard to the Standard Agreement, Project, or any matters arising from either of them is in state court and the Department has received any legal instruments or waivers, all duly approved and executed, as are or may be 167
14 legally necessary and effective to provide for such personal and subject matter jurisdiction in state court.
c. Title Insurance. The Department has received title insurance for the property underlying the Project that is satisfactory to the Department. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, upon a showing of good cause, for Applicants unable to
provide a conventional title insurance policy satisfactory to the Department, this condition may be satisfied by a title status report issued by the BIA Land Title and Records Office and pursuant to a title opinion letter issued for the benefit of the Department but paid for by the Applicant.
d. Recordation Requirements. Where recordation of instruments is a condition of award funding or otherwise required under or pursuant to the Standard Agreement, the subject instrument is recorded with the Land Titles and Records Office at the BIA or in the appropriate official records of the County in which the Project property is located, as may be applicable.
(I) Outreach and engagement activities are eligible as priority setting and components of other Proposed Uses. Program outreach shall not be a standalone Proposed Use. (J) Recipients shall use no more than 5 percent of the allocation(s) for costs related to the administration of the activity(ies) for which the allocation(s) were made.

Staff and overhead costs directly related to carrying out Proposed Uses are not administrative costs.
(K) All Proposed Uses must AFFH.

Section 205: Ineligible Uses
(A) Ineligible uses are uses inconsistent with Program goals and objectives. (B) Ineligible uses apply to suballocations.
(C) Ineligible uses include but are not limited to:

1. Roadway or highway capacity increases

2. Advocacy work (direct lobbying for specific bills or local propositions)

3. Bonus payments of any kind

4. Ceremonial expenses

5. Commission fees

6. Real estate brokerage fees or expenses

7. Services, materials, or equipment obtained under any other state program

8. Stewardship of legal defense funds

9. General meetings that do not specifically discuss or advance implementation of awarded REAP 2.0 funds

10. Using funds for mitigation activities already mandated by local or state governing bodies or agencies

11. On-going expenses (e.g., routine maintenance or operations of transportation infrastructure associated with transit service expansion)

12. Costs associated with automobile or motorcycle parking (excluding EV 168
15 charging infrastructure). Proposed Uses with a surface parking component are not eligible.

13. Costs associated with infrastructure related to fossil fuels, including connections to natural gas infrastructure

14. Costs associated with on-going provisions of internet service

15. In lieu fees for local inclusionary Housing programs

16. Organizational membership fees

17. Street construction or repair to benefit vehicular traffic

18. Other items unrelated to the REAP 2.0 Program or application Section 300: Applicant and Application Provisions
Section 301: Application Requirements and Contents
(A) Until December 31, 2022, or as otherwise prescribed, an Eligible Entity may request an allocation of funds by submitting an application, in the form and manner prescribed by the Department,and developed with the Department and State Collaborative Partners, that includes all of the following information:

1. An identification of priorities utilizing outreach that reflects Program goals and objectives and consideration of inter- and intra-regional coordination, geographic equity, appropriate blends of planning and implementation activities, amount retained by the Eligible Entity versus suballocations, eligible uses (e.g., technical assistance and other activities, accelerating Infill development that facilitates Housing supply, choice, and affordability) and the goals of suballocations in a manner that addresses the unique needs of the region related to Housing, land use, transportation, climate change, equity, and other planning priorities;

2. An allocation budget for the funds;

3. The amounts retained by the Eligible Entity and any suballocations;

4. An explanation of how the Proposed Uses will meet the definition of Transformative Planning and Implementation Activities and, as applicable, constitute high-impact and innovative projects;

5. An explanation of how the Proposed Uses will implement and achieve Housing goals that also reduce VMT;

6. An explanation of how each Proposed Use has a geographic or region-wide benefit

7. An explanation of how each Proposed Use focuses
implementation in areas that satisfy an applicable definition of Infill development (See Attachment 2: Definitions).

8. The application shall reference one or more of the following categories of allowable uses of the funds:
i. Accelerating Infill development that facilitates Housing supply, choice, and affordability
ii. Supporting residents through realizing Multimodal
Communities.
169
16 iii. Reducing driving through shifting travel behavior. iv. Increasing transit ridership.

9. An explanation of the targeted outreach the Eligible Entity has conducted to Disadvantaged and Historically Underserved Communities and how that outreach was incorporated into the Proposed Uses; and

10. An explanation of how Proposed Uses will advance equity by benefiting Disadvantaged and Historically Underserved
Communities.

11. The link to the applicant’s webpage where land use maps and vehicle miles traveled generation maps, as available, are publicly accessible.

12. The Department may request additional information and documentation as appropriate.

13. The Department may consult with and gather relevant information from any individual, entity, or public agency.

Section 302: Application Submittal
(A) An applicant must submit a complete and signed application under the penalty of perjury by email to [email protected] .
(B) Applications must be on Department forms and cannot be altered or modified by the applicant. Program applications and forms are available on the Department’s website.
(C) The Department and State Collaborative Partners encourage early applications and will accept applications up to the date noted in this Notice of Funding Availability.

Section 400: Tribal and Rural Allocation
Section 401: Eligible Applicants
(A) Eligible applicants include:

1. Counties of Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Plumas, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tehama, Tuolumne, and Trinity.

2. A county, a city, a city and county, a transit agency or district and a county transportation agency located within any of the counties described in Section 401(A)(1).

3. Tribal Entities within the state of California.
(B) The Department may approve a fiscal agent to receive funds on behalf of a consortium of Eligible Entities listed.
(C) Eligible Entities may apply directly to HCD for funds pursuant to the Program or through a fiscal agent.
(D) If appointing a fiscal agent, eligible applicants may include single or multiple Eligible Entities.
170
17 (E) More than one Eligible Entity may apply per county. If there is more than one Eligible Entity per County applying for REAP 2.0 funding, Eligible Entities are encouraged but not required to submit a joint application through a fiscal agent. (F) Eligible Entities may partner through legally binding agreements with other forms of governments where the proposal will have a direct effect on land-use, transportation, or development within areas of influence of the Eligible Entity.

This includes, but is not limited to, partnerships with other localities, regional governments, Housing authorities, school districts, special districts, communitybased organizations, Tribal Entities or any duly constituted governing body of an Indian Reservation or Rancheria. Applicants forming partnerships must submit separate, completed, and signed application packages, including resolutions and a copy of the signed agreement between partners. Applicant partners may not submit an application on behalf of the eligible applicant.

Section 402: Award Amounts
(A) The maximum amount that an eligible applicant may receive shall be based on the most recent Department of Finance P-2A County Population Projections as of July 1, 2021.
(B) Amounts shall be calculated based on aggregate 2030 projected population per each eligible applicant as a percentage of projected 2030 statewide population.

See Attachment 3.
(C) The minimum award amount per applicant is $100,000.00. (D) The maximum award amount per applicant is $5,000,000.00. (E) The Department may adjust the minimum and maximum award amounts based on demand or unique circumstances.

Section 403: Application Review
(A) Applications will be reviewed on a competitive basis. (B) The Department, in collaboration with State Collaborative Partners, shall review an application in an expeditious manner.
(C) Applications will be reviewed for completeness, accuracy, threshold, and eligibility requirements.
(D) Complete applications meeting threshold requirements will be scored and ranked according to scoring and geographic distribution criteria. (E) Applications submitted by Tribal Entities for the Tribal Entities allocation (Section 404(A)(6)) are subject to an over-the-counter application review process until the final application deadline.
(F) Upon Department’s initial review of an application from a Tribal Entity, if Threshold Requirements are not met, the applicant may return a revised application within 30 days of the Department’s communication of initial review findings.
(G) Ranked applications will be placed in geographic categories until filled. Once the geographic categories are filled, previously unselected applicants will be selected according to the ranking up until the amount available under the Notice of Funding Availability. If geographic categories are not filled after exhausting the 171
18 ranking, then previously unselected applicants will be selected according to the ranking until the money is gone.
(H) The Department may request additional information to complete and approve the application for funding.
(I) Applications recommended for funding are subject to conditions specified by the Department and State Collaborative Partners.
(J) Successful applicants will receive an Award Letter from the Department and will be awarded funds. Applicants will enter into a state Standard Agreement for distribution of funds. The Standard Agreement will specify, among other things, the amount of funds granted, timeline for expenditure of funds, and the approved use of funds.

Section 404: Geographic Distribution
(A) Ranked Applications with be considered according to geographic categories, as follows:

1. Eastern Slope: Alpine, Inyo and Mono

2. Far North: Lassen, Modoc, Plumas, Sierra, and Siskiyou

3. Motherlode: Amador, Calaveras, Mariposa, Nevada, and Tuolumne

4. North Coast: Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, and Trinity

5. Upper Sacramento Valley: Colusa, Glenn, and Tehama

6. Tribal Entities: All Tribal Entities
(B) 25 percent of the total available under this allocation for the Notice of Funding Availability will be a Tribal set aside only for Tribal Entities (Section 404(A)(6)). (C) Of the 75 percent remaining, 75 percent will be allocated in geographic categories (1)-(5) and calculated proportionally based on 2030 population projections, as determined by the Department of Finance (See Attachment 3: Award Amounts for Eligible Applicants).
(D) The remaining 25 percent of 75 percent will be used as a residual set aside for eligible applicants in geographic categories (1)-(6).
(E) If an applicant’s award amount exceeds the funding available to its geographic category, the applicant may qualify to fulfill their eligible award from the residual set aside (25 percent of 75 percent) in the order the applications were ranked according to scoring criteria.
(F) If funds for geographic categories are not depleted, then funds may, at the discretion of the Department, be utilized toward the residual set aside. Absence of applicants in a geographic category will deem the geographic category closed and funds from that geographic category may, at the discretion of the Department, be utilized toward the residual set aside.
(G) Once a geographic category’s funds have been exhausted, applicants from that geographic category may qualify for funding available in the residual set aside.

Upon exhausting the geographic categories, the Department will award remaining applicants in the scored ranking order with funds from the residual set aside.

Once funds from the residual set aside are awarded, the final applicant in the ranking of applications received will only be eligible for the award amount that remains in the residual set aside.
172
19 Section 405: Suballocations
(A) Eligible Entities may suballocate funds to other Eligible Entities within its borders in the form of grants.
(B) Eligible Entities, for the purposes of suballocations, may be broadly construed and include, but not limited to, a county, a city, a city and county, a transit agency or district, a county transportation agency, Tribal Entity, community-based organizations, Public Housing Authority, academic institution, developers of Affordable Housing, or regional Housing Trust Fund.
(C) Proposed evaluation criteria for any suballocation uses are subject to review and approval by the Department and State Collaborative Partners during the application process, and must align with REAP 2.0 Program goals, objectives, and definitions. Evaluation criteria must be approved by the Department and State Collaborative Partners by March 31, 2023, unless an extension is granted by the Department.
(D) The amount of funds distributed through suballocations must be based on the applicants’ unique Housing, land use, transportation, climate change, equity, and other planning priorities. Additional factors include, but are not limited to, outreach and priority setting, maximization of Program Policy Outcomes consistent with REAP 2.0 Program goals and objectives, and timeliness of expenditure. (E) Suballocations must consider geographic equity, transformative and collaborative approaches to planning and implementation, and the degree to which the suballocation furthers the REAP 2.0 objectives (i.e., accelerating Infill development that facilitates Housing supply, choice, and affordability, reducing VMT, and Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing).
(F) Eligible Entities may consider additional criteria tailored to its unique conditions and circumstances as well as planning priorities for the area. All additional criteria must demonstrably promote REAP 2.0 goals and objectives and be developed in consultation with the Department and State Collaborative Partners. (G) Eligible Entities must award suballocations within 60 days of a complete application being awarded. An award is defined by an official notice (e.g., letter) to the grantee and does not include encumbrance or an executed Standard Agreement.
(H) Eligible Entities may propose suballocations as part of the application for the REAP 2.0 Program.
(I) Eligible Entities shall expeditiously act to execute the Standard Agreement and ensure expenditure deadlines are met throughout the implementation of the REAP 2.0 Program.

Section 406: Scoring Criteria
(A) The Department and State Collaborative Partners review of an application ensures that the application is complete and provides necessary information for the scoring process. The scoring of applications will determine whether funding to support Proposed Uses, and any suballocations, are distributed in a manner that satisfies all Program requirements while appropriately addressing an applicant’s unique housing, land use, transportation, climate change, equity, and other planning priorities consistent with Program goals and objectives. 173
20 (B) Scoring criteria will include Program Objectives and Additional Considerations, generally described as:

1. Program Objectives include Accelerating Infill development that Facilitates Housing Supply, Choice, and Affordability; Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing; and Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled.

2. Additional Considerations include building long-term capacity and expertise, and the degree of needs or potential for Housing, infrastructure, VMT reduction, and disaster recovery and mitigation.
(C) Points will be awarded as follows:

1. Program Objectives (up to 150 points)
i. Accelerating Infill development that Facilitates Housing Supply, Choice, and Affordability (up to 50 points)
ii. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (up to 50 points) iii. Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled (up to 50 points)

2. Additional Considerations (up to 50 points)
i. Building Long-Term Capacity and Expertise (up to 25 points) ii. Degree of Needs or Potential for Housing, Infrastructure, VMT Reduction and Disaster Recovery and Mitigation (up to 25 points) (D) The extent the application achieves each of the Program Objectives and Additional Considerations will be evaluated according to the following criteria:

1. Locational Considerations: The location of Proposed Uses and the degree of impact relative to achieving Program Objectives. Examples include urbanized areas, established community areas, areas with transit or densities, population and employment densities, land use mix, street network connectivity, linkages and pathways with active transportation infrastructure, accessibility between destinations, contiguousness of land uses and transportation networks, identified high growth areas, proximity to multimodal mobility options, surrounding urban uses, areas of higher resource, areas of lower resource or concentrated areas of poverty and Disadvantaged and Historically Underserved Communities.

2. Supporting Attributes: Characteristics of Proposed Uses and the degree of beneficial impact relative to Program Objectives. Examples include job and Housing fits, access to Housing options and affordability, walkable communities, expanded transit services, multimodal infrastructure, enhanced pedestrian and bicycle safety measures, protected pedestrian and bicycle amenities, multimodal infrastructure connections, Housing mobility strategies, Affordable Housing for Low-income Households, reductions in barriers to high density and Housing accessibility.

3. Measurable Policy Outcomes: Proposed Uses should be supported by evidence, including quantifiable targets that assess the degree of impact relative to Program Objectives. Examples include, but are not limited to, mix and intensity of land uses, linkages between land uses and transportation network, mix of Housing units, limited number of off-street parking, Vehicle Miles Traveled reduced, Affordable Housing by income group, Housing types by income group, infrastructure connections, density, and development costs and timing.
174
21 Section 500: Administration
Section 501: Grant Execution and Term
(A) The Department will notify the grantee if they have been selected for a grant award. (B) After the Standard Agreement has been sent electronically, the grantee will be provided instructions for signing all required documents. The grantee must submit all supporting materials and a signed Standard Agreement within the timeline provided in the instructions or risk forfeiting the grant award. (C) The grant term begins on the day the Department and the grantee have fully executed the Standard Agreement. The Department will notify the grantee and partners when work may proceed under the agreement. However, eligible activities that are approved by the Department may be retroactively reimbursed to July 1, 2021.
(D) Each recipient of funds under REAP must encumber those funds no later than June 30, 2024, and expend those funds no later than June 30, 2026. Final invoices must be submitted to the Department three months prior to the expenditure deadline.

Section 502: Accounting and Records
(A) The grantee, its staff, contractors, and subcontractors shall establish and maintain an accounting system and reports that properly accumulate incurred project costs by line. The accounting system shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion, and provide support for payment vouchers and invoices. Grantees may establish and maintain an accounting system and reports, as described above, on behalf of contractors and subcontractors.
(B) The grantee must establish a separate ledger account for receipts and expenditures of grant funds and maintain expenditure details in accordance with the budget and timeline. Separate bank accounts are not required. As appropriate, grantees must establish separate ledgers for State General funds, and other funds associated with Proposed Uses not provided by the REAP 2.0 Program.
(C) The grantee shall maintain documentation of its normal procurement policy, competitive bid process (including the use of sole source purchasing), and financial records of expenditures incurred during the course of the project in accordance with GAAP.
(D) The grantee agrees that the Department or designated representative shall have the right to review and to copy any records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of the Standard Agreement. (E) The grantee agrees to maintain such records for possible audit after the final payment for at least five years after all funds have been expended or returned to the State unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated. Wherever practicable, such records should be collected, transmitted, and stored in open and machine-readable formats.
(F) Subcontractors employed by the grantee and paid with moneys under the terms of this Standard Agreement shall be responsible for maintaining accounting records as specified above.
175
22 Section 503: Invoicing
(A) Grant funds cannot be disbursed until the Standard Agreement has been fully executed.
(B) The grantee will be responsible for compiling and submitting all invoices and reporting documents.
(C) The grantee must bill the Department based on clear deliverables outlined in the Standard Agreement or budget timeline. Generally, approved and eligible costs incurred for work after execution of the Standard Agreement and completed during the grant term will be reimbursable. However, eligible activities conducted prior to award will be reimbursable to July 1, 2021. Approved and eligible costs incurred prior to July 1, 2021, are ineligible,
(D) Project invoices may be submitted to the Department by the grantee on a quarterly basis or upon completion of a deliverable, subject to the Department’s approval.
(E) The Department may consider advance payments or alternative arrangements to reimbursement and payment methods based on demonstrated need. The Department may consider factors such as available funds for eligible activities.

Suballocations to Jurisdictions must request funds in increments or a schedule for advance payments, and report progress according to an implementation and expenditure timetable.
(F) Supporting documentation may include, but is not limited to, purchase orders, receipts, progress payments, subcontractor invoices, timecards, reports, or any other documentation as deemed necessary by the Department to support the reimbursement to the grantee for expenditures incurred. (G) Invoices must be accompanied by supporting documentation where appropriate.

Invoices without supporting documentation will not be paid. The Department may withhold up to 10 percent of the grant until grant terms have been fulfilled, including all required reporting.

Section 504: Audits
(A) At any time during the term of the Standard Agreement, the Department may perform or cause to be performed a financial audit of any and all phases of the award. At the Department’s request, the grantee shall provide, at its own expense, a financial audit prepared by a certified public accountant. The State of California has the right to review project documents and conduct audits during project implementation and over the project life.
(B) The grantee agrees that the Department or the Department’s designee shall have the right to review, obtain, and copy all records and supporting documentation pertaining to performance of this Agreement.
(C) The grantee agrees to provide the Department or the Department’s designee with any relevant information requested.
(D) The grantee agrees to permit the Department or the Department’s designee access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees who might reasonably have information related to such records and inspecting and copying such books, records, 176
23 accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with statutes, Program Guidelines, and the Standard Agreement.
(E) The Department may request additional information, as needed, to meet other applicable audit requirements.
(F) The Department may monitor expenditures and activities of a grantee, as the Department deems necessary, to ensure compliance with REAP requirements. (G) Grantees using federal or state transportation planning funds administered through the Overall Work Program (OWP) shall clearly identify the source of funds.
(H) If there are audit findings, the grantee must submit a detailed response acceptable to the Department for each audit finding within 90 days from the date of the audit finding report.
(I) The grantee agrees to maintain such records for possible audit after the final payment for at least five years after all funds have been expended or returned to the State unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated. Wherever practicable, such records should be collected, transmitted, and stored in open and machine-readable formats.
(J) If any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit, monitoring, inspection, or other action has been started before the expiration of the required record retention period, all records must be retained by the grantee, contractors, and sub-contractors until completion of the action and resolution of all issues which arise from it. In any contract that it enters into in an amount exceeding $10,000, the grantee shall include the Department’s right to audit the contractor’s records and interview their employees.
(K) The grantee shall comply with the caveats and be aware of the penalties for violations of fraud and for obstruction of investigation as set forth in California Public Contracts Code Section 10115.10.

Section 505: Remedies of Non-performance
(A) In the event that it is determined, at the sole discretion of the Department, that the grantee is not meeting the terms and conditions of the Standard Agreement, immediately upon receiving a written notice from the Department to stop work, the grantee shall cease all work under the Standard Agreement. The Department has the sole discretion to determine that the grantee meets the terms and conditions after a stop work order, and to deliver a written notice to the grantee to resume work under the Standard Agreement.
(B) The Department has the right to terminate the Standard Agreement at any time upon 30 days written notice. The notice shall specify the reason for early termination and may permit the grantee or the Department to rectify any deficiency(ies) prior to the early termination date. The grantee will submit any requested documents to the Department within 30 days of the early termination notice.
(C) The applicant must demonstrate a clear and significant nexus to REAP 2.0 Program goals and objectives, including, but not limited to, completion of activities toward Policy Outcomes, and implementation of eligible use activities funded through a suballocation process. Any action inconsistent with REAP 2.0 Program goals and objectives may result in review and could be subject to repayment of 177
24 the grant.
(D) At any time, if the Department finds the grantee falsely proposed information in the application or as part of the application review, the Department may require the repayment of funds.
(E) Grantees are responsible for suballocations meeting all REAP 2.0 requirements. (F) The Department may, as it deems appropriate or necessary, require the repayment of funds from a grantee or pursue any other remedies available to it by law for failure to comply with all REAP 2.0Program requirements.

Section 506: Reporting
(A) At any time during the term of the Standard Agreement, the Department may request a performance report that demonstrates satisfaction of all requirements identified in the Standard Agreement with emphasis on eligible activities, eligible uses, and expenditures according to timelines and budgets referenced in the Standard Agreement.
(B) Grantees shall submit a report, in the form and manner prescribed by the Department, to be made publicly available on its website, by April 1 of the year following the receipt of those funds, and annually thereafter until those funds are expended, that contains the following information:

1. The status of the Proposed Uses and expenditures listed in the Eligible Entity’s application for funding and the corresponding impact, including, but not limited to,
i. Housing units accelerated, and
ii. Reductions in Vehicle Miles Traveled Per Capita, and iii. Location of investment, and
iv. Socioeconomic statistics about the impacted geography, and v. Regional impact explanation

2. All status and impact reports shall be categorized based on the eligible uses specified in Section 50515.08.
(C) Grantees shall collaborate and share progress, templates, and best practices with the Department and fellow recipients in implementation of funds. To the greatest extent practicable, adjacent Eligible Entities shall coordinate in the development of applications, consider potential for joint activities, and seek to coordinate Housing and transportation planning across regions.
(D) Upon completion of all deliverables within the Standard Agreement, the grantee shall submit a close out report in a manner and form prescribed by the Department.

1. Grantee may include a line item for advance payment or reimbursement, as part of its administrative costs, for its final report that is due by June 30, 2026. Funding requests for final reports must be submitted no later than March 31, 2026.

Section 600: Right to Modify or Suspend Guidelines and Final Decision Making
(A) The Department reserves the right, at their sole discretion, to suspend, amend, or modify the provisions of these Guidelines at any time, including, without 178
25 limitation, the amount of funds available hereunder. If such an action occurs, the Department will notify all interested parties and will post the revisions to the Department’s website. You may subscribe to the Department email listserv. (B) The Department’s decision to approve or deny an application or request for funding pursuant to the Program, and its determination of the amount of funding to be provided or requested for repayment or other remedies for failure to comply with Program requirements, shall be final.
179
26 Attachment 1: Statute
SEC. 15.

Chapter 3.15 (commencing with Section 50515.06) is added to Part 2 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:

CHAPTER 3.15. Regional Early Action Planning Grants Program of 2021 50515.06.

For purposes of this chapter:
(a) “Department” means the Department of Housing and Community Development. (b) “Program” means the Regional Early Action Planning Grants of 2021 established pursuant to this chapter.
(c) “Regional housing need assessment” means the existing and projected need for housing for each region, as determined by the department pursuant to Section 65584.01 of the Government Code.
(d) “Sustainable Communities Strategies” refers to the plan prepared by each metropolitan planning organization pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080 of the Government Code.
(e) “Alternative Planning Strategy” refers to the document, if any, prepared by a metropolitan planning organization pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080 of the Government Code.
(f)
(1) “Transformative planning and implementation activities” means housing, planning, infrastructure investments supporting infill housing, and other actions that enable meeting housing goals that also result in per capita vehicle miles traveled reductions, including accelerating infill development, supporting residents through realizing multimodal communities, shifting travel behavior through reducing driving, and increasing transit ridership.
(2) Transformative planning and implementation activities shall be in furtherance of all of the following:
(A) State planning priorities, as described in Section 65041.1 of the Government Code. (B) Affirmatively furthering fair housing pursuant to Section 8899.50 of the Government Code.
(C) Facilitating housing element compliance for the sixth cycle regional housing needs assessment pursuant to Section 65302 of the Government Code prepared in accordance with Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code.
(D) A region’s sustainable community strategy, as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080 of the Government Code, or alternative planning strategy, as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080 of the Government Code, as applicable.
(g) “Eligible Entity” means any recipient of these funds either through direct allocation from the department or through a suballocation from a recipient. For the purposes of this chapter, an Eligible Entity can include a metropolitan planning organization (MPO), a single or multicounty council of governments (COG), a regional transportation planning agency (RTPA), a county, a city, a city and county, a transit agency or district, a county transportation agency, or a Tribal Entity.
(h) “Tribal Entity” means an entity formed by the duly constituted governing body of a California 180
27 Native American Tribe in Chapter 905 of the Statutes of 2004, as described in Section 21073 of the Public Resources Code.
50515.07.
(a)
(1) The Regional Early Action Planning Grants Program of 2021 is hereby established for the purpose of providing regions with funding, including grants, for transformative planning and implementation activities.
(2) Upon appropriation by the Legislature for this purpose, funds shall be distributed under the program in accordance with this chapter.
(b) The department, in collaboration with the Office of Planning and Research, the Strategic Growth Council, and the State Air Resources Board, shall develop and administer the program and, consistent with the requirements of this chapter, provide grants to eligible entities for implementing planning and implementation activities. The department shall seek input from the transportation and housing coordination workgroup established through Section 50407.5. (c) Distribution and expenditures of funds shall be made consistent with the state planning priorities, established pursuant to Section 65041.1 of the Government Code, and shall consider geographic equity among regions of the state.
(d) Of the total amount of any moneys appropriated for purposes of this chapter, the department shall set aside up to 5 percent for program administration, including state operations expenditures and technical assistance, as well as expenditures by recipients of funding pursuant to Sections 50515.08 and 50515.09.
50515.08.
(a) The funds described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 50515.07 shall be available only to the following entities before any suballocation:
(1) The Metropolitan Transportation Commission, representing the Counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma, and the City and County of San Francisco.
(2) The Sacramento Area Council of Governments, representing the Counties of El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba.
(3) The San Diego Association of Governments, representing the County of San Diego. (4) The Southern California Association of Governments, representing the Counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. (5) The Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments, representing the counties of Monterey, San Benito and Santa Cruz.
(6) The San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments, the Fresno Council of Governments, the Kern Council of Governments, the Kings County Association of Government, the Madera County Transportation Commission, the Merced County Association of Governments, the San Joaquin Council of Governments, the Stanislaus Council of Governments, the Tulare County Association of Governments, the Butte County Association of Governments, Shasta County Regional Transportation Agency, and the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency created by interstate compact and ratified by Title 7.4 (commencing with Section 66800) of the Government Code. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the eligible entities described in this paragraph may apply directly to the department for funds pursuant to the program. (7) Eligible entities in the Counties of Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Plumas, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tehama, Tuolumne, and Trinity. Notwithstanding any other 181
28 provision of this chapter, eligible entities within the counties listed in this paragraph or Tribal Entities may apply directly to the department for funds pursuant to the program. The department may approve a fiscal agent to receive funds on behalf of a consortium of entities listed in this paragraph.
(b)
(1) The department shall calculate the amount of each maximum grant allocation in accordance with the methodology described in subdivision (a) of Section 50515.09. (2) An eligible entity shall, in consultation with the department and consistent with the requirements of this chapter, determine the appropriate use of funds and suballocations within its boundaries in a manner that appropriately addresses its unique housing, land use, transportation, climate change, equity and other planning priorities. (c)
(1) Subject to paragraph (5), until December 31, 2022, an eligible entity described in subdivision (a) may request an allocation of funds pursuant to this section by submitting an application, in the form and manner prescribed by the department, developed in collaboration with the Office of Planning and Research, the Strategic Growth Council, and the State Air Resources Board, that includes all of the following information:
(A) An allocation budget for the funds provided pursuant to this section. (B) The amounts retained by the eligible entity and any suballocations. (C) An explanation of how the proposed uses will meet the definition of transformative planning and implementation activities and, as applicable, constitute high-impact and innovative projects and actions.
(D) An explanation of how the proposed uses will implement and achieve housing goals that also result in per capita vehicle miles traveled reductions in furtherance of the region’s Sustainable Communities Strategies or alternative planning strategy, as applicable.
(E) The application shall reference one or more of the following categories of allowable uses of the funds:
(i) Accelerating infill development, including housing. (ii) Supporting residents through realizing multimodal communities. (iii) Shifting travel behavior through reducing driving. (iv) Increasing transit ridership.
(F) An explanation of the targeted outreach the MPO has conducted to disadvantaged and historically underserved communities and how that outreach was incorporated into the proposed uses.
(2) The department, in collaboration with the Office of Planning and Research, the Strategic Growth Council, and the State Air Resources Board, shall review an application submitted pursuant to this subdivision in an expeditious manner. Upon approval of an application for funds pursuant to this subdivision, the department shall award the moneys for which the eligible entity qualifies. (3) Commencing January 1, 2022, an eligible entity described in paragraphs (1) to (5) of subdivision (a), inclusive, as applicable, may request up to 10 percent of the funding available to it under this section in advance of a full request for funding made pursuant to paragraph (1) to develop and accelerate the implementation of the requirements described in paragraph (1), including, but not limited to, regional engagement in the development of the full application and of an education and outreach strategy. The department shall award funds requested pursuant to this paragraph to the relevant eligible entity in an expeditious manner after receiving that request. (4) The department may develop a streamlined application procedure that accounts for 182
29 the limited resources generally among the regional entities listed in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a).
(5) If an amount of funds described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 50515.07 remains unallocated after December 31, 2022, the department, at its discretion, may make those funds available through a subsequent notice of funding availability in which funds are offered on a competitive basis pursuant to this chapter. An eligible entity described in subdivision (a) may request an allocation of funds made available through the subsequent notice of funding availability by submitting an application, in the form and manner prescribed by the department.
(d) In consultation with the department, any entity that receives an allocation of funds pursuant to this section shall establish priorities and use those moneys for eligible transformative planning and implementation activities that include, but are not limited to, all of the following:
(1) Providing jurisdictions and other local agencies with technical assistance, planning, temporary staffing, or consultant needs associated with updating local planning and zoning documents and other actions that accelerate infill housing production. (2) Administering any programs described in this subdivision. (3) Covering the costs of temporary staffing or consultant needs associated with the activities described in paragraphs (1) and (2), inclusive. (4) Accelerating infill development, including through all of the following:
(A) Rezoning and encouraging development by updating planning documents and zoning ordinances, including general plans, community plans, specific plans, Sustainable Communities Strategies, and local coastal programs. (B) Revamping local planning processes to accelerate infill housing production and other infill development.
(C) Completing environmental clearance to eliminate the need for project-specific review for infill development.
(D) Establishing and funding an affordable housing catalyst fund, trust fund, or revolving loan fund for location efficient projects.
(E) Performing infrastructure planning and investing in upgrading infrastructure, including for sewers, water systems, transit, roads, or other public facilities necessary to enable reduction in per capita vehicle miles traveled, including accelerating housing production.
(5) Supporting residents through realizing multimodal communities, including through all of the following:
(A) Establishing and implementing a vision-zero policy and program, a safety plan, and a slow streets program.
(B) Developing bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure plans and other multimodal plans or policies.
(C) Investing in infrastructure projects and other programs to expand active transportation and implement bicycle or pedestrian plans. (D) Producing multimodal corridor studies associated with developing specific planning documents or implementation actions.
(6) Shifting travel behavior through reducing driving, including through all of the following:
(A) Studying and implementing road pricing.
(B) Funding the establishment of a local vehicle miles traveled impact fee or regional vehicle miles traveled mitigation bank.
(C) Funding and implementing parking and transportation demand management programs or ordinances.
(D) Accelerating infill housing production near jobs, transit, and resources. 183
30 (7) Increasing transit ridership, including through all of the following:
(A) Funding and implementing actions to establish more seamless regional transit systems between and across communities, including establishing common fares, schedules, service design, and wayfinding.
(B) Developing and implementing multimodal access plans to and from transit facilities. (C) Planning for additional housing near transit.
(f)
(1) In consultation with the department, any entity that receives an allocation of funds pursuant to this section may suballocate moneys directly to eligible entities in the form of grants. Following awards to eligible entities, eligible entities shall award suballocations within 60 days.
(2) All suballocations pursuant to this subdivision shall consider geographic equity, including the needs of rural and urban communities, transformative and collaborative approaches, including through subregions, and the degree to which the suballocation will be in furtherance of all of the requirements of transformative planning and implementation activities described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (f) of Section 50515.06. 50515.09.
(a) Of the amount described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 50515.07, 85 percent shall be available to the entities described in paragraphs (1) to (5), inclusive, of subdivision (a) of Section 50515.08 for transformative planning and implementation activities.

The maximum amount that an entity may receive pursuant to this subdivision shall be determined as follows:

The maximum amount that an Eligible Entity may receive pursuant to this subdivision shall be based on the most recent Department of Finance P-2A County Population Projections as of July 1, 2021. Amounts shall be calculated based on aggregate 2030 projected population per each eligible applicant as a percentage of projected 2030 statewide population. (b) Of the amount described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 50515.07, 5 percent shall be available to the eligible entities described in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 50515.08 for transformative planning and implementation activities. (c) Of the amount described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 50515.07, 5 percent shall be available as a competitive set aside available to all eligible entities for transformative planning and implementation activities that demonstrably exceed the requirements of this chapter and further multiple policy objectives. Scoring criteria for this competitive set aside will include, but are not limited to, the extent of acceleration of infill housing production and reduction of per capita vehicle miles traveled.
50515.10.
(a)
(1) Subject to paragraph (2), an Eligible Entity that receives an allocation of program funds pursuant to Section 50515.08 shall submit a report, in the form and manner prescribed by the department, to be made publicly available on its internet website, by April 1 of the year following the receipt of those funds, and annually thereafter until those funds are expended, that includes, but is not limited to, the following information:
(A) The status of the proposed uses and expenditures listed in the Eligible Entity’s application for funding and the corresponding impact, including, but not limited to, housing units accelerated and reductions in per capita vehicle miles traveled. (B) All status and impact reports shall be categorized based on the Eligible Uses specified in Section 50515.08.
184
31 (2) The department may request additional information, as needed, to meet other applicable reporting or audit requirements.
(b) The department shall maintain records of the following and provide that information publicly on its internet website:
(1) The name of each applicant for program funds and the status of that entity’s application.
(2) The number of applications for program funding received by the department. (3) The information described in subdivision (a) for each recipient of program funds. (c) A recipient of funds under this program shall post, make available, and update, as appropriate on its internet website, land use maps and vehicle miles traveled generation maps produced in the development of its adopted Sustainable Communities Strategies. (d) A recipient of funds under this program shall collaborate and share progress, templates, and best practices with the department and fellow recipients in implementation of funds. To the greatest extent practicable, adjacent eligible entities shall coordinate in the development of applications, consider potential for joint activities, and seek to coordinate housing and transportation planning across regions.
(e)
(1) A recipient of funds under the program shall expend those funds no later than June 30, 2024.
(2) No later than June 30, 2025, each Eligible Entity that receives an allocation of funds pursuant to Section 50515.08 shall submit a final report on the use of those funds to the department, in the form and manner prescribed by the department. The report required by this paragraph shall include an evaluation of actions taken in support of the entity’s proposed uses of those funds, as specified in the entity’s application, including, but not limited to, housing units accelerated and per capita reductions in vehicle miles traveled. (f) The department may monitor expenditures and activities of an applicant, as the department deems necessary, to ensure compliance with program requirements. (g) The department may, as it deems appropriate or necessary, request the repayment of funds from an applicant, or pursue any other remedies available to it by law for failure to comply with program requirements.
(h) The department, in collaboration with the Office of Planning and Research, the Strategic Growth Council, and the State Air Resources Board, may implement the program through the issuance of forms, guidelines, application materials, funding allocation methodologies, and one or more notices of funding availability, as the department deems necessary, to exercise the powers and perform the duties conferred on it by this chapter. Any forms, guidelines, application materials, funding allocation methodologies, or notices of funding availability prepared or adopted pursuant to this section are exempt from the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
(i) The department’s decision to approve or deny an application or request for funding pursuant to the program, and its determination of the amount of funding to be provided or request for repayment or other remedies for failure to comply with program requirements, shall be final.

AB 175
SEC. 8.

Section 50515.08 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
50515.08.
(a) The funds described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 50515.07 shall be 185
32 available only to the following entities before any suballocation:
(1) The Metropolitan Transportation Commission, representing the Counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma, and the City and County of San Francisco.
(2) The Sacramento Area Council of Governments, representing the Counties of El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba.
(3) The San Diego Association of Governments, representing the County of San Diego. (4) The Southern California Association of Governments, representing the Counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. (5) The Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments, representing the counties of Monterey, San Benito and Santa Cruz.
(6) The San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments, the Fresno Council of Governments, the Kern Council of Governments, the Kings County Association of Government, the Madera County Transportation Commission, the Merced County Association of Governments, the San Joaquin Council of Governments, the Stanislaus Council of Governments, the Tulare County Association of Governments, the Butte County Association of Governments, Shasta County Regional Transportation Agency, and the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency created by interstate compact and ratified by Title 7.4 (commencing with Section 66800) of the Government Code. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the eligible entities described in this paragraph may apply directly to the department for funds pursuant to the program. (7) Eligible Entities in the Counties of Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Plumas, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tehama, Tuolumne, and Trinity. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, eligible entities within the counties listed in this paragraph or tribal entities may apply directly to the department for funds pursuant to the program. The department may approve a fiscal agent to receive funds on behalf of a consortium of entities listed in this paragraph.
(b)
(1) The department shall calculate the amount of each maximum grant allocation in accordance with the methodology described in subdivision (a) of Section 50515.09. (2) An Eligible Entity shall, in consultation with the department and consistent with the requirements of this chapter, determine the appropriate use of funds and suballocations within its boundaries in a manner that appropriately addresses its unique housing, land use, transportation, climate change, equity and other planning priorities. (c)
(1) Subject to paragraph (5), until December 31, 2022, an Eligible Entity described in subdivision (a) may request an allocation of funds pursuant to this section by submitting an application, in the form and manner prescribed by the department, developed in collaboration with the Office of Planning and Research, the Strategic Growth Council, and the State Air Resources Board, that includes all of the following information:
(A) An allocation budget for the funds provided pursuant to this section. (B) The amounts retained by the Eligible Entity and any suballocations. (C) An explanation of how the proposed uses will meet the definition of transformative planning and implementation activities and, as applicable, constitute high-impact and innovative projects and actions.
(D) An explanation of how the proposed uses will implement and achieve housing goals that also result in per capita vehicle miles traveled reductions in furtherance of 186
33 the region’s Sustainable Communities Strategies or alternative planning strategy, as 187
34 applicable.
(E) The application shall reference one or more of the following categories of allowable uses of the funds:
(i) Accelerating infill development, including housing. (ii) Supporting residents through realizing multimodal communities. (iii) Shifting travel behavior through reducing driving. (iv) Increasing transit ridership.
(F) An explanation of the targeted outreach the MPO has conducted to disadvantaged and historically underserved communities and how that outreach was incorporated into the proposed uses.
(G) An explanation of how proposed uses will advance equity by benefiting disadvantaged and historically underserved communities. (2) The department, in collaboration with the Office of Planning and Research, the Strategic Growth Council, and the State Air Resources Board, shall review an application submitted pursuant to this subdivision in an expeditious manner. Upon approval of an application for funds pursuant to this subdivision, the department shall award the moneys for which the Eligible Entity qualifies. (3) Commencing January 1, 2022, an Eligible Entity described in paragraphs (1) to (5) (6), inclusive, of subdivision (a), inclusive, as applicable, may request up to 10 percent of the funding available to it under this section in advance of a full request for funding made pursuant to paragraph (1) to develop and accelerate the implementation of the requirements described in paragraph (1), including, but not limited to, regional engagement in the development of the full application and of an education and outreach strategy. The department shall award funds requested pursuant to this paragraph to the relevant Eligible Entity in an expeditious manner after receiving that request.
(4) The department may develop a streamlined application procedure that accounts for the limited resources generally among the regional entities listed in paragraph (6) (7) of subdivision (a).
(5) If an amount of funds described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 50515.07 remains unallocated after December 31, 2022, the department, at its discretion, may make those funds available through a subsequent notice of funding availability in which funds are offered on a competitive basis pursuant to this chapter. An Eligible Entity described in subdivision (a) may request an allocation of funds made available through the subsequent notice of funding availability by submitting an application, in the form and manner prescribed by the department.
(d) In consultation with the department, any entity that receives an allocation of funds pursuant to this section shall establish priorities and use those moneys for eligible transformative planning and implementation activities that include, but are not limited to, all of the following:
(1) Providing jurisdictions and other local agencies with technical assistance, planning, temporary staffing, or consultant needs associated with updating local planning and zoning documents and other actions that accelerate infill housing production. (2) Administering any programs described in this subdivision. (3) Covering the costs of temporary staffing or consultant needs associated with the activities described in paragraphs (1) and (2), inclusive. (4) Accelerating infill development, including through all of the following:
(A) Rezoning and encouraging development by updating planning documents and zoning ordinances, including general plans, community plans, specific plans, Sustainable Communities Strategies, and local coastal programs. 188
35 (B) Revamping local planning processes to accelerate infill housing production and 189
36 other infill development.
(C) Completing environmental clearance to eliminate the need for project-specific review for infill development.
(D) Establishing and funding an affordable housing catalyst fund, trust fund, or revolving loan fund for location efficient projects.
(E) Performing infrastructure planning and investing in upgrading infrastructure, including for sewers, water systems, transit, roads, or other public facilities necessary to enable reduction in per capita vehicle miles traveled, including accelerating housing production.
(5) Supporting residents through realizing multimodal communities, including through all of the following:
(A) Establishing and implementing a vision-zero policy and program, a safety plan, and a slow streets program.
(B) Developing bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure plans and other multimodal plans or policies.
(C) Investing in infrastructure projects and other programs to expand active transportation and implement bicycle or pedestrian plans. (D) Producing multimodal corridor studies associated with developing specific planning documents or implementation actions.
(6) Shifting travel behavior through reducing driving, including through all of the following:
(A) Studying and implementing road pricing.
(B) Funding the establishment of a local vehicle miles traveled impact fee or regional vehicle miles traveled mitigation bank.
(C) Funding and implementing parking and transportation demand management programs or ordinances.
(D) Accelerating infill housing production near jobs, transit, and resources. (7) Increasing transit ridership, including through all of the following:
(A) Funding and implementing actions to establish more seamless regional transit systems between and across communities, including establishing common fares, schedules, service design, and wayfinding.
(B) Developing and implementing multimodal access plans to and from transit facilities. (C) Planning for additional housing near transit.
(f)
(1) In consultation with the department, any entity that receives an allocation of funds pursuant to this section may suballocate moneys directly to eligible entities in the form of grants. Following awards to eligible entities, eligible entities shall award suballocations within 60 days.
(2) All suballocations pursuant to this subdivision shall consider geographic equity, including the needs of rural and urban communities, transformative and collaborative approaches, including through subregions, and the degree to which the suballocation will be in furtherance of all of the requirements of transformative planning and implementation activities described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (f) of Section 50515.06.

SEC. 9.

Section 50515.09 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
50515.09.
(a) Of the amount described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 50515.07, 85 percent shall be available to the entities described in paragraphs (1) to (5), (6), inclusive, of 190
37 subdivision (a) of Section 50515.08 for transformative planning and implementation activities.

The maximum amount that an entity may receive pursuant to this subdivision shall be determined as follows:

SEC. 10.

Section 50515.10 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
50515.10.
(a)
(1) Subject to paragraph (2), an Eligible Entity that receives an allocation of program funds pursuant to Section 50515.08 shall submit a report, in the form and manner prescribed by the department, to be made publicly available on its internet website, by April 1 of the year following the receipt of those funds, and annually thereafter until those funds are expended, that includes, but is not limited to, the following information:
(A) The status of the proposed uses and expenditures listed in the Eligible Entity’s application for funding and the corresponding impact, including, but not limited to, housing units accelerated and reductions in per capita vehicle miles traveled. (B) All status and impact reports shall be categorized based on the Eligible Uses specified in Section 50515.08.
(2) The department may request additional information, as needed, to meet other applicable reporting or audit requirements.
(b) The department shall maintain records of the following and provide that information publicly on its internet website:
(1) The name of each applicant for program funds and the status of that entity’s application.
(2) The number of applications for program funding received by the department. (3) The information described in subdivision (a) for each recipient of program funds. (c) A recipient of funds under this program shall post, make available, and update, as appropriate on its internet website, land use maps and vehicle miles traveled generation maps produced in the development of its adopted Sustainable Communities Strategies. (d) A recipient of funds under this program shall collaborate and share progress, templates, and best practices with the department and fellow recipients in implementation of funds. To the greatest extent practicable, adjacent eligible entities shall coordinate in the development of applications, consider potential for joint activities, and seek to coordinate housing and transportation planning across regions.
(e)
191
38 (1) A recipient of funds under the program shall obligate those funds no later than June 30, 2024, and expend those funds no later than June 30, 2024. 2026. (2) No later than June 30, 2025, 2026, each Eligible Entity that receives an allocation of funds pursuant to Section 50515.08 shall submit a final report on the use of those funds to the department, in the form and manner prescribed by the department. The report required by this paragraph shall include an evaluation of actions taken in support of the entity’s proposed uses of those funds, as specified in the entity’s application, including, but not limited to, housing units accelerated and per capita reductions in vehicle miles traveled.
(f) The department may monitor expenditures and activities of an applicant, as the department deems necessary, to ensure compliance with program requirements. (g) The department may, as it deems appropriate or necessary, request the repayment of funds from an applicant, or pursue any other remedies available to it by law for failure to comply with program requirements.
(h) The department, in collaboration with the Office of Planning and Research, the Strategic Growth Council, and the State Air Resources Board, may implement the program through the issuance of forms, guidelines, application materials, funding allocation methodologies, and one or more notices of funding availability, as the department deems necessary, to exercise the powers and perform the duties conferred on it by this chapter. Any forms, guidelines, application materials, funding allocation methodologies, or notices of funding availability prepared or adopted pursuant to this section are exempt from the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
(i) The department’s decision to approve or deny an application or request for funding pursuant to the program, and its determination of the amount of funding to be provided or request for repayment or other remedies for failure to comply with program requirements, shall be final. 192
39 Attachment 2: Definitions
All terms not defined below shall, unless their context suggests otherwise, be interpreted in accordance with the meanings of terms described in Chapter 3.15 of Health and Safety Code sections 50515.06 to 50515.10.

1. “Accelerating Housing Production” or “Accelerating Infill Development, Including Housing” means planning, infrastructure, and other investment and actions that improve the affordability, timing, cost, feasibility, approval, and amount of housing development.

2. “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing”, pursuant to Government Code section 8899.50 means taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. Specifically, Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws.

3. “Affordable Housing” means Housing that is affordable (generally 30 percent of gross income) to Lower- and Moderate-income households.

4. “Areas of High Segregation and Poverty” means areas that meet consistent standards for both poverty (30 percent of the population below the federal poverty line) and racial segregation (overrepresentation of people of color relative to the county).

5. “Council of Governments” or “COG” means a single or multicounty council created by a joint powers agreement pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with section 6500) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code that is responsible for allocating regional housing needs pursuant to sections 65584,65584.04, and 65584.05 of the Government Code.

6. “Department” means the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

7. “Disadvantaged and Historically Underserved Communities” includes concentrated areas of poverty; Areas of High Segregation and Poverty and areas of low to moderate access to opportunity (TCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Maps); Communities of Concern, Disadvantaged Communities (SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities Map), and LowIncome Communities pursuant to Senate Bill 535 (De León, Chapter 830, Statutes of 2012) and Assembly Bill 1550 (Gomez, Chapter 369, Statutes of 2016); areas of high Housing cost burdens; areas with high vulnerability of displacement; areas related to Tribal Entities; and other areas experiencing disproportionate impacts of California’s Housing and climate crisis. Applicants may propose alternative definitions to Disadvantaged and Historically Underserved Communities in consultation with the Department and the State Collaborative Partners.

8. “Eligible Entity” means any entity that is eligible to be a recipient of these funds either 193
40 through direct allocation from the Department or through a suballocation from a recipient.

For the purposes of this chapter, an Eligible Entity can include a metropolitan planning organization (MPO), a single or multicounty Council of Governments (COG), a regional transportation planning agency (RTPA), a county, a city, a city and county, a transit agency or district, a county transportation agency, or a Tribal Entity.

9. “Housing” means any development that includes a house, an apartment, a mobilehome, manufactured home, ortrailer, a group of rooms, or a single room that is occupied as separate living quarters, or, if vacant, is intended for occupancy as separate living quarters. Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants live separately from any other individuals in the building, and which have a direct access from the outside of the building or through a common hall.

Note: accessory dwelling units (ADU) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADU) pursuant to Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 meet the definition above.

10.“Housing Element” or “Element” means the Housing Element of a community’s General Plan, as required pursuant to subdivision (c) of section 65302 of the Government Code and prepared in accordance with Article 10.6(commencing with section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code.

11.“Housing Trust Fund” means a Local or Regional Housing Trust Fund that is required to be a public, joint public and private, or charitable nonprofit organization organized under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, which was established by legislation, ordinance, resolution (including nonprofit articles of incorporation), or a public-private partnership organized to receive specific public, or public and private, revenue to address local or regional Housing needs.

12. “Infill”, for the purposes of the REAP 2.0 Program, means areas where all the following apply: (1) the area consists of unused or underutilized lands (2) within existing development patterns (3) that is or will be accessible to destinations and daily services by transit, walking, or bicycling and located in either:
a. An urban center, urban corridor, or area with transit-supportive densities, or b. An established community that meets all the following criteria:
i. The area consists or previously consisted of qualified urban uses ii. The area is predominantly surrounded (approximately 75 percent of the perimeter) by parcels that are developed or previously developed with qualified urban uses. In counting this, perimeters bordering navigable bodies of water and improved parks shall not be included, and iii. No parcel within or adjoining the area is classified as agricultural or natural and working lands.
c. Under unique circumstances, applicants may propose an alternative definition of “Infill” subject to approval by the Department and State Collaborative Partners.

13.“Jurisdiction” means:
a. any city, including a charter city,
b. county, including a charter county, or
c. city and county, including a charter city and county. 194
41 14.“Lower-income Households” as defined by Section 50079.5 the California Health and Safety Code means individual households with either 1) household incomes at or below 80 percent of the statewide median income, or 2) household incomes at or below the threshold designated as low-income by Department of Housing and Community Development’s State Income Limits adopted pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 50093.

15.“Moderate-income Households”, means individual households with either 1) household incomes between 80 and 120 percent of the statewide median income, or 2) household incomes at or below the threshold designated as moderate-income by Department of Housing and Community Development’s State Income Limits adopted pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 50093.

16.“Multimodal Communities” are those which are served by a variety of travel options that accommodate a variety of transportation modes for the public to access daily destinations. Multimodal options can include, but are not limited to, complete street improvements for active transportation, improving access to transit, and creating highquality transit stops.

17.“Policy Outcomes” means measures that are a direct result of and demonstrate efficacy of the REAP 2.0 Program.

18.“Program” means the Regional Early Action Planning Grants of 2021 established pursuant to this chapter.

19.“Proposed Use” means an eligible use, combination of eligible uses, or a combination of eligible uses with non-REAP 2.0 planning or implementation efforts that demonstrate a reasonable relationship to each other. It does not mean subcomponents, task, or subtask of an eligible use.

20.“Regional Housing Needs Assessment” means the existing and projected need for Housing for each region, as determined by the Department pursuant to Section 65584.01 of the Government Code.”

21.“State Collaborative Partners” means the California Air Resources Board (CARB), Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and California Strategic Growth Council (SGC).

22.“State Planning Priorities” means priorities that are intended to promote Infill Development and equity, protect environmental and agricultural resources, and encourage efficient development patterns outside of Infill areas pursuant to Government Code section 65041.1.

23.“Transformative Planning and Implementation Activities” means Housing, planning, infrastructure investments supporting Infill development that facilitates Housing supply, choice, and affordability, and other actions that enable meeting Housing goals that also result in Vehicle Miles Traveled Per Capita reductions, including accelerating Infill Development, supporting residents through realizing Multimodal Communities, shifting 195
42 travel behavior through reducing driving, and increasing transit ridership. Transformative Planning and Implementation Activities are meant to address these goals together and to lead to changes in land use patterns and behaviors. Transformative Planning and Implementation Activities shall be in furtherance of all of the following:
a. State Planning Priorities, as described in Section 65041.1 of the Government Code.
b. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing pursuant to Section 8899.50 of the Government Code.
c. Facilitating Housing Element compliance for the sixth cycle Regional Housing Needs Assessment pursuant to Section 65302 of the Government Code prepared in accordance with Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code. d. A region’s sustainable community strategy, as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080 of the Government Code, or alternative planning strategy, as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080 of the Government Code, as applicable.

24.“Tribal Entity” means an entity that meets at least one of the following definitions:
a. An Entity formed by the duly constituted governing body of a California Native American Tribe in Chapter 905 of the Statutes of 2004, which means a Native American tribe located in California that is on the contact list maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission, as described in Section 21073 of the Public Resources Code
b. A Tribally Designated Housing Entity as defined in Section 4103(22) of Title 25 of the United States Code and Section 50104.6.5,
c. An Indian Tribe as defined in Section 4103(13)(B) of Title 25 of the United States Code and Section 50104.6.5.

25. “Tribal Lands” means Tribal trust land, as defined in 18 USC section 1151, fee land within Reservation or Rancheria, fee land outside Reservation or Rancheria, and leasehold estate outside of Reservation or Rancheria.

26.“Vehicle Miles Traveled” means metric to evaluate the total miles of vehicles traveling on a roadway over a period of time.

27.“Vehicle Miles Traveled Per Capita” means the number of Vehicle Miles Traveled, per person.
196
43 Attachment 3: Award Amounts by Eligible Applicant
Geographic category Counties Maximum amount available Population (1) Eastern Slope $672,144.65 33,323
Alpine
Inyo
Mono
(2) Far North $2,060,042.77 102,131
Lassen
Modoc
Plumas
Sierra
Siskiyou
(3) Motherlode $5,132,972.02 254,478
Amador
Calaveras
Mariposa
Nevada
Tuolumne
(4) North Coast $6,603,327.52 327,374
Del Norte
Humboldt
Lake
Mendocino
Trinity
(5) Upper Sacramento Valley $2,406,513.04 119,308
Colusa
Glenn
Tehama
(6) Tribal Entities
All CA
Counties $7,500,000.00
Residual Set Aside $5,625,000.00
Total $30,000,000.00
197
44 Attachment 4: Applying Units of Measurement
Applicants must provide sufficient evidence that demonstrates a nexus between a Proposed Use and meeting all REAP 2.0 goals and objectives. This table is meant to illustrate one example of how applicants might demonstrate this nexus and measure Policy Outcomes Step 1: Meeting all REAP 2.0 Program Threshold Requirements Step 2:

Achieving All
Program
Objectives
Locational
Considerations
Measurable Outcomes
The Proposed Use can be
measured by, but is not
limited to:

A Sample of Potential Uses
Accelerating Infill
Development that
facilitates Housing
supply, choice,
and affordability
- Infill areas
- Number of Housing units
(total, type, affordable, and
per acre),
- Capital investments to
support Housing
development,
- Mix of Housing unit types or
sizes,
- Increasing land use
intensities,
- Count of sites developable
for future Housing, and/or
- Number of new Housing
units supported or provided
by the Proposed Use
- Affordable Housing
development programs
- Affordable Housing
predevelopment costs
- Planning activities that lead to
increased residential and/or
mixed-use zoned capacity in
areas identified as infill
- Program-level environmental
- Upgrading infrastructure for
sewer, water, and dry utility
systems
Affirmatively
Furthering Fair
Housing (AFFH)
-Higher Resource
Communities or Areas
- Number of new Affordable
Housing units, and/or
- Number of existing Housing
units continued to be made
available and affordable,
- Zoning, permit streamlining,
fees, incentives, and other
approaches to increase
Housing choices and
affordability,
- Increase accessible number
of units above state law
- Increase in rate of Housing
Choice Voucher usage in
high opportunity census
tracts,
- Housing mobility strategies,
- Affordable Housing unit
production,
- Reductions to barriers to higher
density Housing, buildings with 4
or more units, and accessibility,
- Outreach strategies to address
local opposition to Proposed Use
198
45 - Disadvantaged and
Historically
Underserved
Communities
- Number of new Affordable
Housing units, and/or
- Number of existing Housing
units continued to be made
available and affordable,
- Zoning, permit streamlining,
fees, incentives, and other
approaches to increase
Housing choices and
affordability,
- Increase accessible number
of units above state law
- New or enhanced public
services and community
assets such as parks,
schools, social service
programs, active
transportation, infrastructure,
and other community
amenities, and/or
- Increased access to public
services,
- Housing-supportive
infrastructure services in
areas of concentrated poverty
or similar areas
- Affordable Housing
preservation,
- Anti-displacement protections,
- Expanded Housing options,
- Housing-supportive
infrastructure
Reducing Vehicle
Miles Traveled - Infill areas
- - Estimate for VMT reduced
per capita
- Number of distinct land uses
within the site,
- Number of distinct land uses
around the site,
- Number of surrounding
connections,
- Mix of Housing unit types or
sizes,
- New or enhanced transit
services,
- Increased transit
frequencies and/or ridership,
- New pedestrian or bicycle
pathways, and/or
- Limited off-street parking
Land use planning, policies, or
investment strategies that result
in increasing:
- Population and employment
densities,
- Land use mix,
- Street network connectivity,
- Linkages and pathways with
active transportation
infrastructure,
- Accessibility between
destinations, and/or
- Contiguousness of land uses
and transportation networks
Transportation planning, policies,
and investment strategies:
- Increased transit services and
access,
- Building at walkable community
scales,
- Enhanced pedestrian and
bicycling safety measures,
- Protected pedestrian and
bicycling amenities, and/or
- Multimodal infrastructure
connections with multimodalmobility transportation systems 199
PAGE 1
S:\City Council\Council Agenda packet\2022 - Council Agenda Packets\12 - December\12-20- 22\KRRC Reso\Staff Report KRRC Payment Agreement.docx

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
TO: Yreka City Council
FROM: Jason Ledbetter, City Manager, Dohn Henion, City Attorney AGENDA TITLE: Motion to Adopt a Resolution Approving the Agreement on Payment for Past Expenses Related to Potential Impacts of Lower Klamath Project on the City of Yreka’s Water
Diversion Facilities
MEETING DATE: December 20, 2022
Discussion:

City Attorney, Mr. Dohn Henion has been working with the Klamath River Renewal Corporation (KRRC) to address impacts resulting from the project that affect the City’s water supply.

Mr. Henion has expended time and sought services of Gretchen Umlauf, a fish hatcheries specialist to ensure the continued operations of the City’s diversion facilities on Fall Creek, considering the presence of fish in Fall Creek following the removal of Iron Gate Dam and the reconstruction of Fall Creek Hatchery.

Within the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement (section 7.2.3.B(3)), the agreement calls for “assessment, mitigation, and/or funding to address any impacts resulting from implementation”; and the City of Yreka and KRRC have cooperated in assessment of options to avoid any potential liability arising under the federal Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq. (ESA), related to the City of Yreka’s continued operation of its diversion facilities on Fall Creek, taking into account the presence of fish in Fall Creek following the removal of Iron Gate Dam and the reconstruction of Fall Creek Hatchery.

The KRRC is working with the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) to advance NMFS’s preferred method for ESA compliance at the diversion facilities, namely, an amendment to the existing Biological Opinion and Incidental Take Permit related to the Iron Gate Hatchery; and before the NMFS established this preferred method for ESA compliance.

The City of Yreka incurred expenses for activities of its City Attorney and a technical consultant, Ms. Gretchen Umlauf, to prepare a Habitat Conservation Plan as a potential method for compliance with respect to the diversion facilities; and the City Attorney has provided the KRRC with appropriate documentation of such expenses.

This resolution and agreement, cooperatively seeks to compensate the City to a large extent for its costs and enters into this agreement willingly as the City of Yreka and the KRRC did not have an agreement in place at the time that the City incurred such expenses. 200
PAGE 2
S:\City Council\Council Agenda packet\2022 - Council Agenda Packets\12 - December\12-20- 22\KRRC Reso\Staff Report KRRC Payment Agreement.docx
Acceptance of this agreement constitutes an agreement that such payment is in full satisfaction of KRRC’s obligations for the City’s activities related to preparation of the Habitat Conservation Plan. And the City of Yreka will release the KRRC and State of California, from any claim for additional reimbursement to the City for its expenses and activities related to such preparation.

Fiscal Impact:

Within 30 days of signing this agreement, the KRRC will pay the City of Yreka $92,500 for the City’s expenses and activities related to preparing the Habitat Conservation Plan, for the purpose of implementation of Section 7.2.3.B prior to the Effective Date.

Recommendation andRequested Action:

Motion that the City Council Adopt a Resolution Approving the Agreement on Payment for Past Expenses Related to Potential Impacts of Lower Klamath Project on the City of Yreka’s Water Diversion Facilities.

Approved by: __________________________________
Jason Ledbetter, City Manager
201
Yreka-KRRC Payment Agreement
1 of 4
Resolution No. 2022-61
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka Approving the Agreement on Payment for Past Expenses Related to Potential Impacts of Lower Klamath Project on the City of Yreka’s Water Diversion Facilities The City of Yreka, California and Klamath River Renewal Corporation (Parties) enter into this “Agreement on Payment for Past Expenses related to Potential impacts of the Lower Klamath Project on the City of Yreka’s Water Diversion Facilities.” Recitals
WHEREAS, the City of Yreka diverts water from Fall Creek, tributary to the Klamath River, for municipal water supply, pursuant to Water Rights permit 15379; and the diverted water is conveyed through a 24-inch water line buried in the bed of Iron Gate Reservoir;
WHEREAS, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) has licensed the Lower Klamath Project, which includes Iron Gate Dam and Reservoir, as FERC P-14803.

WHEREAS, the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement (2016) (KHSA) establishes a process for removal of the four developments that comprise the Lower Klamath Project, including Iron Gate Dam and Reservoir; WHEREAS, the Commission has approved transfer of license for the Lower Klamath Project from PacifiCorp, as the current licensee, to the Klamath River Renewal Corporation (KRRC) and the State of California and Oregon, as co-licensees, effective upon license surrender; and on November 17, 2022, the Commission approved an application for license surrender, including removal of Iron Gate Dam and Reservoir, as well as a proposal to re-construct and operate Fall Creek Hatchery immediately downstream of the City of Yreka’s water diversion facilities; WHEREAS, KHSA Section 7.2.3(B) requires the development of an engineering assessment of options to assure that the City of Yreka has continued use of water supply facilities, during and after dam removal; KRRC has completed such assessment and a design for relocation and replacement of the existing water line buried in Iron Gate Reservoir; and the City of Yreka, through its City Council, has approved that design; WHEREAS, with the City’s permission, the KRRC has submitted applications for regulatory permits necessary for replacement of the water line; 202
Yreka-KRRC Payment Agreement
2 of 4
WHEREAS, KHSA section 7.2.3.B(3) also calls for “assessment, mitigation, and/or funding to address any impacts resulting from implementation”; and the City of Yreka and KRRC have cooperated in assessment of options to avoid any potential liability arising under the federal Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq. (ESA), related to the City of Yreka’s continued operation of its diversion facilities on Fall Creek, taking into account the presence of fish in Fall Creek following the removal of Iron Gate Dam and the reconstruction of Fall Creek Hatchery; WHEREAS, the KRRC is working with the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) to advance NMFS’s preferred method for ESA compliance at the diversion facilities, namely, an amendment to the existing Biological Opinion and Incidental Take Permit related to the Iron Gate Hatchery;
WHEREAS, before NMFS established this preferred method for ESA compliance, the City of Yreka incurred expenses for activities of its City Attorney and a technical consultant to prepare a Habitat Conservation Plan as a potential method for compliance with respect to the diversion facilities; and the City Attorney has provided the KRRC with appropriate documentation of such expenses;
WHEREAS, the City of Yreka and KRRC did not have an agreement in place at the time that the City of Yreka incurred such expenses; THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows.

Terms

1. Payment. Within 30 days of the Effective Date, KRRC will pay the City of Yreka $92,500 for the City of Yreka’s expenses and activities related to preparing the Habitat Conservation Plan, for the purpose of implementation of Section 7.2.3.B prior to the Effective Date.

2. Satisfaction and Release. The Parties agree that such payment is in full satisfaction of KRRC’s obligations for payment to the City of Yreka for its expenses and activities related to preparation of the Habitat Conservation Plan. The City of Yreka hereby releases KRRC (including its directors, officers, employees and agents) and the State of California (as KRRC’s co-licensee), from any claim for additional reimbursement to the City of Yreka for its expenses and activities related to such preparation.

3. Development of Further Agreement. KRRC represents, and the City acknowledges, that it has a fiduciary duty to manage its public funds prudently, and that 203
Yreka-KRRC Payment Agreement
3 of 4
it has a policy of requiring a written, signed agreement before a third party incurs reimbursable expenses for work to implement the KHSA. By January 31, 2023, or twelve months prior to the commencement of draw-down for Iron Gate Reservoir, whichever is later, the Parties will develop a further agreement that: (a) confirms KRRC’s design and construction plan for the relocation and replacement of the City of Yreka’s water line buried in Iron Gate Reservoir; and (b) establishes procedures and requirements for reimbursement of the City of Yreka’s expenses for its oversight of the construction plan.

4. Notices. Any notice under this Agreement will be written and delivered by electronic mail, or by first-class mail or overnight delivery using a trackable service, as follows:

For City of Yreka:

Dohn Henion
City Attorney
280 Fairway Village Ln.

Roseburg, OR 97471
[email protected]
For Klamath River Renewal Corporation:

Laura F. Hazlett
Chief Operations Officer
2001 Addison Street, Ste. 317
Berkeley, CA 94704
[email protected]
with a copy to:

Richard Roos-Collins
Water and Power Law Group PC
2140 Shattuck Avenue, Ste. 801
Berkeley, CA 94704
[email protected].

5. No Third Party Beneficiary. This Agreement is for the benefit of the Parties and does not establish any third party beneficiary.

6. Governing Law. This Agreement will be interpreted and otherwise governed under the laws of the State of California.
204
Yreka-KRRC Payment Agreement
4 of 4

7. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only in written form signed by both Parties.

8. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts.

9. Effective Date. This Agreement is effective when signed by duly authorized representatives of both Parties.

10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement states the entirety of the understandings between the Parties in this matter and supersedes any other understandings, whether written or oral, in this matter.

Adopted this 20th day of December 2022, by the following called vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Dated: December 20, 2022
_________________________________
Corey Middleton, Mayor
City of Yreka, California
_____________________
Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk
City of Yreka, California
Dated: December ____, 2022
_________________________________
Laura F. Hazlett
Chief Financial Officer
Klamath River Renewal Corporation
205
Approved by: __________________________________
Jason Ledbetter, City Manager

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
TO: Yreka City Council
FROM: Mark Gilman, Chief of Police
AGENDA TITLE: Discussion and Possible Action: Adopt a Resolution Approving and Authorizing as Sole Source Provider, the
Procurement of Sun Ridge Systems Software and the
necessary related hardware and allow for the execution of all necessary documents for the purchase.

MEETING DATE: 12/20/2022
Discussion:

The Yreka Police Department is needing to purchase and implement a new CAD/RMS (CADS – Computer Aided Dispatch, RMS – Records Management Systems), known as Sun Ridge Systems. The purchase of approximately $340,000 would come primarily from the City’s available restricted funds, Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Asset Forfeiture reserves and State Asset Forfeiture reserves.

Background:

The Yreka Police Department’s (Department) current CAD/RMS known as Cyrun Alliance has become technologically obsolete. The Department has had this system for approximately 14 years. The Cyrun Alliance system does not function efficiently, and we have struggled with it since we got it.

The Department has over the past six months researched other available CADS/RMS software products that would resolve the current shortcomings of Cyrun Alliance, and also have a large dispatch user community that would help ensure product evolution and viability. The Department’s research staff has selected Sun Ridge Systems as the best product to meet those needs.

It is typical for the Department to update to newer systems that are more efficient. In the 30+ years I have been at YPD we have gone through three systems. Before that there was no computer aided system available due to technology.

The first system was a basic search system called “LEADS.” That system was very basic and came out in the early 1990’s. YPD then upgraded to a system called “Global” that had more features. The reason for the update was that LEADS no longer provided the service and was outdated. We used Global for many years; however, it also became outdated and was a struggle. We then went to the current Cyrun Alliance system.

Cyrun Alliance has not been an easy, user friendly, system since we went to it. The search features are limited, and it lacks the state and federal reporting abilities that are needed. For the past 14 years those stats are hand counted and then uploaded to appropriate websites. These requirements changed recently and have a more in-depth 206
DECEMBER 13, 2022
PAGE 2
2 reporting requirement. This is known as CYBRS/NIBRS. This reporting is very time consuming, and a more efficient system is needed.

The search and reporting abilities of the current Cyrun Alliance system are also outdated and lacking for dispatch and patrol. Searching for contact information is difficult and, in some cases, not capable of providing the search at all. The system also requires information to be interred twice. When dispatch builds the call and the report they enter information, such as address and names. When the officer writes the report all that information needs to be entered again. This is very time consuming.

Why Sun Ridge Systems:

1. Ease of Use: Sunridge system is a user-friendly system that is in use with another agency in the county and agencies nearby the county.

2. Connectivity to Other Agencies: YPD would be able to connect to those other agencies and share information. The required stats, CYBRS/NIBRS and RIPA, are sent to the required organizations automatically saving time.

3. Mobile/Field Accessibility: The system is also compatible with cell phones and MDT’s saving time with reports. Not only will this system streamline the process at YPD; it will also allow the city access and the Yreka Fire Department. YPD would also be able to send cases directly to the District Attorney’s Offic

4. AMD Dispatch: The software is configured where it can be and is in use by numerous organizations to dispatch fire and medical calls, utilizing Advance Medical Dispatch (AMD) protocols.

Overall, this is a superior system with many more features than are listed here. The product will the Department save time and money, enable us to become more efficient.

We have researched several vendors and other systems. Sunridge is the only available option that meets all of our needs at YPD. We have spent several months reviewing the Sun Ridge system; going to on-site visits at the Weed Police Department (which uses this system) and meetings with Sunridge staff. The Siskiyou County Sheriff’s Department has plans to transition to Sun Ridge Systems in the near future. This is the best option for the Department and a needed upgrade.

Procurement: Sole Source Provider:

The Sunridge system provides (needed) features that other systems do not offer, making it a unique in the marketplace as a software product. Sunridge is used by other law enforcement agencies in the area that provides for (1) data sharing, making it possible to share information utilizing “RIMS Collaborate”. Also, the Department would have access to information that has not been inputted into our department’s system. This saves time by reducing the amount of time it takes to enter new information.

Sunridge also has mobile features that are not available on some new systems. This allows officers to (2) complete reports in the field, rather than return to the office and spend time at a desk. This will keep officers in the field longer and reduce response times to calls. Sun Ridge software will also (3) generate the state and federal statistics that are required. This is a feature that is lacking on some systems. Currently YPD 207
DECEMBER 13, 2022
PAGE 3
3 spends a large amount of time compiling statistics to report to the feds and state. Using Sunridge will free up more time for the admin staff to complete their work. Sunridge also has a (4) user-friendly search capability that appears better than the other systems we have reviewed, also a time saver.

Sunridge is the only system we have researched that meets all of our needs and should be considered a sole source vender.

Fiscal Impact: $280,000 software/server, or $340,000 with field mobile data terminals Software: YPD has asset forfeiture money available. The purchase of this system is a covered expense that the money can be used for. The package price for the CAD/RMS system for the Department is quoted at $210,000. The RIMS Fire Dispatching option would be an estimated $16,500 additional expense including the first year’s maintenance costs. The ongoing annual maintenance and support cost for Sunridge is similar to what YPD pays now to Cyrun Alliance and is $17,175.

Server(s): In addition, there will be a cost for a new server currently quoted at $50,000 (NVR Exacqvision camera system sole server required).

Field Mobile Data Terminals (MDT): For field access, the Department would like to add five MDT’s to patrol for use in the field, with hardware, is estimated at $54,000, plus $6,000(1) additional fleet installation costs. The add-on of the MDT’s is approximately $60,000.
(1) (It would be an additional $2000 per patrol unit to equip with the hardware and wiring so the remaining fleet of patrol units would be MDT capable, and an officer could take an MDT out of the fully equipped unit and simply plug in the MDT and keyboard and go on patrol. It would be no more than three additional patrol units that would be required to be outfitted, adding $6,000.00 to the total cost of $51,106.10. This expense is being placed on hold as MDT’s can wait for future available funding. Costs may increase with time between quote and actual purchase.

Business Analysis:

The Finance Committee met in November and evaluated the business needs and benefits of the software. The committee unanimously recommended bringing this to the City Council for consideration. The committee recommends appropriating $220,000 from Federal Asset Forfeiture reserves and the balance of approximately $60,000 from State Asset Forfeiture reserves, and $60,000 from General Fund capital outlay reserves.

Recommendation:

Motion that the City Council Approve Resolution 2022-62 Approving and Authorizing as Sole Source Provider, the Procurement of Sun Ridge Systems Software and the necessary related hardware and allow for the execution of all necessary documents for the purchase. 208
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-62

RESOLUTION OF THE YREKA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AS SOLE

SOURCE PROVIDER, THE PROCUREMENT OF SUN RIDGE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE AND THE

NECESSARY RELATED HARDWARE AND ALLOW FOR THE EXECUTION OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS FOR THE PURCHASE.

WHEREAS, the City, is a municipal corporation, which has the authority to purchase and finance software and equipment; and,
WHEREAS, the City maintains a police department established pursuant to Yreka Municipal Code, Title 2.32; and,
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2022, Yreka Police Department made a recommendation to the City Council that the City acquire Sun Ridge Systems Software Package for Computer Aided Dispatch and Records Management System, and related necessary hardware for operations, and WHEREAS, the software identified above is privately sourced as Sun Ridge as the sole source for “RIMS Collaborate” and “RIMS Mobile”, features for interagency data sharing and field mobile device integration, and,
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that the City procure the equipment described herein as sole source provider from Sun Ridge Systems, El Dorado Hill, California for the purchase of software and necessary hardware as described in this Resolution in the amount not to exceed $340,000 for the use by the Yreka Police Department; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Yreka has determined that it is for the common benefit and in the best interest of the City for the procurement of the software and hardware described in this Resolution; and, WHEREAS, the City of Yreka has a strategy to conserve general fund reserves and is utilizing approximately $280,000 of asset forfeiture seizure funds to facilitate the purchase, and $60,000 from general fund capital reserves.

WHEREAS, the City Council hereby authorizes the City Attorney to review the Purchase Agreement, together with the City Manager for the purchase authorized herein and to execute any other documents authorized and necessary by this Resolution to carry out the purpose of this Resolution;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

1. Purchase Agreement. The City Council hereby approves entering into a Purchase Agreement and authorizes the City Manager to execute and deliver the Purchase Agreement, together with any changes therein or additions thereto deemed advisable.

2. Findings. The acquisition of the Fire Apparatus, under the terms and conditions provided for in the Agreement and this Resolution, is necessary, convenient, in the furtherance of and will at all times be used in connection with the City of Yreka's governmental and proprietary purposes and functions (except to the extent that subleasing of the Equipment is permitted under terms of the Agreement) and are in the best interest of the City of Yreka, and no portion of the Fire Apparatus will be used directly or indirectly in any trade or business carried on by any person other than a governmental unit of the State on a basis different from the general public.
209

3. Maintenance. The City covenants that it will perform all acts within its power which are or may be necessary to ensure the maintenance of its legal status as being a duly organized and existing entity under the laws of the State of California, which status is to at all times remain exempt from federal income taxation under the laws and regulations of the United States of America as presently enacted and construed or as hereafter amended.

4. Savings Clause. It is further resolved, if any section, subsection, part, clause, sentence or phrase of this Resolution or the application thereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution, the application thereof, shall not be effected thereby but shall remain in full force and effect, it being the intention of the City Council to adopt each and every section, subsection, part, clause, sentence phrase regardless of whether any other section, subsection, part, clause, sentence or phrase or the application thereof is held to be invalid or unconstitutional.

5. Other Actions. The City Manager and other officers of the City are each hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things to execute and deliver any and all agreements, documents and certificates which they may deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms of this Resolution and the Purchase Agreement. Such actions are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.

6. Attestations. The City Clerk or other appropriate City officer is hereby authorized and directed to attest the signature of the City Manager, and to affix and attest the seal of the City, as may be required or appropriate by in connection with the execution and delivery of the Purchase Agreement.

7. Effect. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

Passed and adopted this 20th day of December 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________________________________
Corey Middleton, Mayor
Attest:
_________________________________________________
Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk
210
To:

From:

Subject:

Date:

Chief Mark Gilman, Yreka Police Department
Tamera Melrose
Ballpark Quotation for RIMS Software No Data Conversion November 4, 2022
The following is a quotation for RIMS software based upon your recent request.

Item Price
RIMS Computer-Aided Dispatch and Records Management Software $53,000 RIMS Mobile Computer Software $16,000
iRIMS Law iOS/Android App Software $7,000
RIMS Property Room Bar Coding Software $9,000
RIMS Citizen RIMS Public Access Software $7,000
RIMS E911 Link Software $6,000
RIMS State Link Software (CLETS) $6,000
RIMS Text Paging Link Software $2,500
RIMS Collaborate Data Sharing Software $5,000
RIMS Officer Training Management Software $3,000
Worth Data Bar Coding Equipment (See Bar Coding Equipment note) $1,700 Installation and Training (Includes 18 days on site - see Installation & Training note) $76,357 Annual Support and Updates – First Year $17,175
RIMS In Station Mapping Software [Not Included] $11,000 RIMS Mobile Mapping Software [Not Included] $5,000
RIMS InCustody Jail Management Software [Not Included] $31,000 InCustody Lite Software [Not Included] $18,000
RIMS AFIS Link Software [Not Included] $4,000
RIMS DA Link Software [Not Included] $3,000
RIMS Body Camera Software [Not Included] $2,000
RIMS CopLogic Import Software [Not Included] $2,000
RIMS AutoCite Import Software [Not Included] $4,000
RIMS SWITRS Export Software [Not Included] $3,000
RIMS ProQ&A Link Software [Not Included] $2,000
RIMS Alarm Panel Link Software [Not Included] $2,000
California Sales Tax $131
TOTAL $209,863
Note that besides the products for which you requested quotes, we have also listed our other available software products with a "[Not Included]" notation. The price shown for some modules not selected are not all inclusive and do not include costs for items such as map data engineering, installation, and annual support. These products are not included in our quote.
211
Data Conversion: No conversion of existing data is included in this quotation.

Bar Coding Equipment: The bar-coding equipment, manufactured by Worth Data, includes a base station and wireless scanning terminal. These devices include a 2-year manufacturer's warranty and are not maintained by Sun Ridge. You must also purchase an inexpensive printer and labels for bar coding labels: DYMO LabelWriter 550 Turbo Label Printer and Dymo Labels # 30256. They are available at your local computer/office supply store or on the Internet.

E911 Requirements: You will need to ensure that your E911 controller is CAD compatible, meaning it has the proper software and port to be able to connect to and communicate with a CAD system. You can obtain this information by contacting your E-911 provider. You may also need a cable to connect this PC to your E911 controller but again, this information will be available from your E911 provider.

State Link: Our price includes RIMS software only. It does not include the cost of any physical connections from your agency to either the local message switch or a direct line to DOJ, nor does it include any third-party products that may be required to connect to these paths.

Collaborate: RIMS Collaborate, integrates directly to RIMS CAD, RMS, and Mobile applications, seamlessly and connects RIMS agencies together. Agencies can share unlimited records of CAD and RMS information and view the same detailed information from other RIMS agencies. Each agency decides what information to share, down to an individual record type.

Citizen RIMS: This software does not require any new dedicated hardware or software. It can run on your existing SQL or application server. It does require a server with internet access that also can have RIMS installed. The only software on your network will be a small Windows service which sends data to the public web server.

There is some minor configuration that must occur in RIMS. You will be asked to create "categories" for Incidents and Offenses. The Windows service previously mentioned uses the categories to determine what to send to the public web server.
iRIMS/Law will run on the Apple iPhone and iPad plus, Android phones and tablet computers. iRIMS is not a substitute for Mobile RIMS nor is it "RIMS" running on an iPhone or iPad device. iRIMS is a iOS/Android software App with a rapidly expanding portfolio of RIMS functionality.

There may be some states that have not yet granted access for state queries from iOS/Android devices; those functions will be implemented in iRIMS/Law once approved.

RIMS 2 Text: This product utilizes our RICO web services product, whereby text messages are sent to a device using one of two separate methods. The agency can use SMTP to route email messages (which can also go toan email-enabled device) or can utilize Twilio SMS Services. 212
Installation and Training: The number of onsite training and support days includes the following. All training is end user training unless specified otherwise. The number and types of classes must be confirmed by you.

Task Days
RIMS Configuration and Set Up 2
CAD Training 4 (2 sessions, 2 days/session)
Officer Training – 1 2 (1 session, 2 days/session)
Officer Training – 2 2 (1 session, 2 days/session)
Property Room Training 0.5
Records Training 1
Admin Review Training 1
Officer Training (TIMS) 1
IT Go Live Prep 1
Go Live 4 (2 staff on-site for 2 days each)
Post Go Live Follow-Up 0.5 (Remote 4 hours)
System Requirements
Database Software: Microsoft SQL Server software is required to run the RIMS database. This software is not included in this quotation and must be purchased by the agency prior to installation of any RIMS software.

System Specifications: RIMS software supports a traditional hardware platform or a virtual platform. Hypervisor software products supported include; VMWare, Hyper-V, and others.

Minimum Specifications (If using existing PCs) Monitor Resolution: 1920 x 1080 PC Workstations Database Server
Windows 10+ i7 processor Microsoft Windows Server 2016+ 8 GB RAM 16 GB RAM
Any size disk 1 TB Disk
Microsoft SQL Server 2016+
Recommended Specifications (If purchasing new PCs) Monitor Resolution: 1920 x 1080 PC Workstations Database Server
Windows 10+ i7 processor Microsoft Windows Server 2016+ 16 GB RAM 32 GB RAM
Any size disk 2 TB Disk
Microsoft SQL Server 2016+
Sun Ridge Systems uses BeyondTrust remote access software for secure installation and follow-on support services. BeyondTrust software is provided by Sun Ridge Systems; there is no cost to you. 213
Lease-Purchase Plan Options
We offer the following lease-purchase plans at 5% interest:

Lease Term Lease Payment Support Payment Total Annual Payment 3 years $67,394 $17,175 $84,569
5 years $42,362 $17,175 $59,537
Terms of Lease
Annual Payments are due at the beginning of each year financed. The first payment is due upon contract signing. After the second year the lease can be canceled, and the products returned by Lessee at any time with 60 days’ notice. At the end of the lease Lessee will own a perpetual license for the software and only must make an annual support payment.

If you have any questions, please call me on 800-474-2565. Thank you for your interest in Sun Ridge Systems RIMS software.
214
To:

From:

Subject:

Date:

Chief Mark Gilman, Yreka Police Department
Tamera Melrose
Quotation for RIMS Software
November 4, 2022
The following is a quotation for RIMS software based upon your recent conversation with Bryan Morehouse.

Item Price
iRIMS Fire iOS/Android App Software $7,000
RIMS Fire Records Management Link Software (Emergency Reporting) $4,000 Installation Completed via Remote Access and Phone. $3,400 Annual Support and Updates – First Year $1,650
TOTAL $16,050
iRIMS/Law will run on the Apple iPhone and iPad plus, Android phones and tablet computers. iRIMS is not a substitute for Mobile RIMS nor is it "RIMS" running on an iPhone or iPad device. iRIMS is a iOS/Android software App with a rapidly expanding portfolio of RIMS functionality.

This quotation is for RIMS software only and does not include any hardware or third-party software that may be required to support this interface. You are encouraged to contact your fire RMS vendor to determine any costs that may be associated with providing their portion of the interface.

This quotation is valid for 90 days and may change thereafter. If you have any questions, please call me on 800-474-2565. Thank you for your continued interest in RIMS. 215
S:\City Council\Council Agenda packet\2022 - Council Agenda Packets\12 - December\12-20- 22\Staff Report YPD Homeless Liasion Agreement with Siskiyou County.docx

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
TO: Yreka City Council
FROM: Jason Ledbetter, City Manager, Mark Gilman, Yreka Police Chief AGENDA TITLE: Motion to Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his delegate to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the Siskiyou County Health and Human Services and the City of Yreka Police Department for Homeless Liaison Officer Services.

MEETING DATE: December 20, 2022
Discussion:

Exhibit A of the Agreement outlines the specific duties and responsibilities that meet both the needs and expectations of Siskiyou County Health and Human Services Agency and the specialized training, resources, and abilities of a sworn officer. This model of program has been successful in numerous California cities experiencing growth in the homeless population.

Fiscal Impact:

The contract provides for up to $160,000 annually for services and vehicle use to the City. The City’s finance department will bill monthly Siskiyou County Behavioral Health Services Fiscal Department.

Recommendation andRequested Action:

Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his delegate to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the Siskiyou County Health and Human Services and the City of Yreka Police Department for Homeless Liaison Officer Services.

Approved by: __________________________________
Jason Ledbetter, City Manager
216
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-63

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA

AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

WITH SISKIYOU COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

AND CITY OF YREKA POLICE DEPARTMENT
FOR HOMELESS LIAISON OFFICER SERVICES.

WHEREAS, the Siskiyou County Health and Human Services “County” desires to enter into an agreement with City of Yreka, Yreka Police Department “City” to utilize the specialized services of a Homeless Liaison Officer to provide specialized homeless outreach and coordination services within the City of Yreka; and WHEREAS, County is responsible for County administered Mental Health Services Act services; that requires specialized services in support of both its programmatic and administrative functions, and
WHEREAS, the County and City have come to an understanding of specific duties and responsibilities that meet both the needs and expectations of Siskiyou County Health and Human Services Agency and the specialized training, resources, and abilities of a City Homeless Liaison Officer (a sworn peace officer).

WHEREAS, representatives from the County and the City have met to provide such agreement that provides for compensation of the Homeless Liaison Officer services and, WHEREAS, the members of the City Council, with the assistance of its staff, have reviewed said agreement and has determined it would be in the best interests of the City to approve and authorize the execution of said document.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Council hereby finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct, and the agreement entitled “MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

WITH THE SISKIYOU COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AND THE

CITY OF YREKA POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR HOMELESS LIAISON OFFICER SERVICES” attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby approved.

Section 2. The City Council of the City of Yreka does hereby find that the Agreement described herein is in the best interests of the City of Yreka, and the City Council does hereby authorize execution of said Agreement by the City Manager on behalf of the City of Yreka. The City Manager or designee is hereby further authorized and directed to execute such other agreements, documents and certificates, and to perform such other acts and deeds, as may be necessary or convenient to effect the purposes of this Resolution and the transactions herein authorized, and the City Clerk or 217
such Clerk's designee is hereby authorized and directed to affix the City's seal to said documents and to attest thereto.

Section 3. It is further resolved, if any section, subsection, part, clause, sentence or phrase of this Resolution or the application thereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution, the application thereof, shall not be effected thereby but shall remain in full force and effect, it being the intention of the City Council to adopt each and every section, subsection, part, clause, sentence phrase regardless of whether any other section, subsection, part, clause, sentence or phrase or the application thereof is held to be invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

Passed and adopted this 20nd day of December 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Corey Middleton, Mayor
Attest:__________________
Rhetta Hogan,
City Clerk
218

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN

THE SISKIYOU COUNTY HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

AND THE CITY OF YREKA POLICE DEPARTMENT
This Memorandum of Understanding is entered into this day of , 2022, by and between the SISKIYOU COUNTY HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, hereinafter referred to as “SCHHSA” and the CITY OF YREKA, YREKA POLICE DEPARTMENT, hereinafter referred to as “CITY”.

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, SCHHSA is responsible for County administered Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) services; and
WHEREAS, SCHHSA requires specialized services in support of both its programmatic and administrative functions, and
WHEREAS, CITY has the experience, staff and expertise to provide specialized homeless outreach and coordination services,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Services: CITY agrees to provide homeless outreach and coordination services for SCHHSA as described in Exhibit “A.” The Homeless Liaison Officer shall include the services that were provided, the number of individuals served and any other relevant data at the Continuum of Care, CoC, board meetings.

2. Compensation: In consideration for the services to be performed by CITY, SCHHSA agrees to pay CITY in proportion to services satisfactorily performed as specified in Exhibit “A” the not to exceed amount of One Hundred and Sixty Thousand Dollars and No/100 Cents ($160,000.00).

3. Billing: CITY shall submit original detailed invoices for all services being performed on a monthly basis to the Behavioral Health Services Fiscal Department. SCHHSA agrees to pay CITY within 30 days of receipt of invoice. The Homeless Liaison Officer shall provide a status report monthly to the Continuum of Care (CoC) Advisory Board.

CITY shall be responsible for all costs and expenses incident to the performance of services for SCHHSA, except as provided as specified in Exhibit “A”.

4. Term: This Memorandum of Understanding shall commence on October 1, 2022, and shall continue until June 30, 2023, or until terminated by either party as set forth below.
219

5. Termination: Either party may terminate this Memorandum of Understanding at any time by giving the other party with Board of Supervisors approval, thirty (30) days written notice of such termination. Termination shall have no effect upon the rights and obligations of the parties arising out of any transaction occurring prior to the effective date of such termination. CITY shall be paid for all work satisfactorily completed prior to the effective date of said termination.

6. Termination of Funding: County may terminate this Contract in any fiscal year in that it is determined there is not sufficient funding. California Constitution Article XVI Section 18.

7. Records: CITY shall keep complete and accurate records for the services performed pursuant to this MOU and shall make such records available to SCHHSA upon request. Records shall be kept for a period of at least five (5) years after the termination of the MOU, or until all audits for compliance with terms, conditions and specification of the MOU are completed, whichever is later, or for a longer period of time if required by law. CITY shall provide all information necessary for reports required by the SCHHSA, State or Federal government. CITY shall fully cooperate with SCHHSA in providing any information required by any governmental entity concerning the program or services subject to this MOU. CITY agrees to assure the confidentiality of any records that are required by law to be so maintained.

8. Confidentiality: SCHHSA and CITY agree to comply with and require their officers, employees, agents, volunteers, contractors, and sub-contractors to comply with the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code Section 10850 and the California Department of Social Services’ Manual of Policies and Procedures, Division 19 to assure that:

A. All records concerning any applicant or participant shall be confidential and shall not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding. No person shall publish or disclose, or use or permit, or cause to be published, disclosed, or used, any confidential information pertaining to any applicant for or recipient of public social services.

B. SCHHSA and City agree to inform all of their officers, employees, agents, volunteers, contractors and sub-contractors of the provisions mandated by Welfare and Institutions Code Section 10850 and the California Department of Social Services’ Manual of Policies and Procedures, Division 19 and to further inform them that any person knowingly and intentionally violating the provisions of said State law is guilty of a misdemeanor.

9. Nondiscrimination: CITY and SCHHSA are both bound by Siskiyou County’s policies prohibiting discrimination (2.1 et seq. Siskiyou County Personnel Policies) apply to this MOU and are incorporated herein by reference with the same force and effect as if these policies were specifically set out herein and both agree to comply with these policies.
220

10. Grievance Procedure: If CITY is required by ordinance, regulation, policy, State, County or other authority to have a procedure for filing and considering grievances, CITY shall provide SCHHSA with a copy of CITY’s grievance procedure prior to providing services under this Contract.

11. Compliance with Child, Family and Spousal Support Reporting Obligations:

CITY shall comply with all state and federal child, family and spousal support reporting requirements and shall comply with all lawfully served wage and earnings assignment orders or notices of assignment relating to child, family and spousal support obligations.

12. Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting: CITY shall comply with all state and federal laws pertaining to the reporting of child abuse and/or neglect. CITY’s officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall report all known or suspected instances of child abuse and/or neglect to the Child Protective Services agency or other agency as required by Penal Code Section 11164 et seq.

13. Changes in Regulations: If SCHHSA notifies CITY of a change in County, SCHHSA, or State regulations or guidelines affecting MOU activities, CITY shall choose one of the following options and notify the SCHHSA in writing within five (5) days of receipt of the notice as to its choice: (1) Indicate that CITY’s operations are currently in compliance with the change in regulation or guideline; (2) Indicate that CITY is in the process of modifying operations to comply with the change and will complete these modifications and be in compliance within thirty (30) days of notification by County or SCHHSA; or (3) Notify SCHHSA of termination of the MOU or seek modification of any terms of the MOU materially affected by a regulation or guideline change.

14. Notice: Any notices required to be given pursuant to the terms and provisions herein shall be in writing and shall be sent by First Class mail to:

SCHHSA: Siskiyou County Health & Human Services Agency
Attn: Sarah Collard, Ph.D.
2060 Campus Drive
Yreka, CA 96097-3321
Phone: (530) 841-4789
CITY: Yreka Police Department, for City of Yreka
Attn: Mark Gilman, Chief of Police
1400 Fairlane Rd.

Yreka, CA 96097
Phone: (530) 841-2300

15. Severability: If any provision of this MOU is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be void, invalid or unenforceable, the provision will either be reformed to comply with applicable law or stricken if not so conformable. The validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions of them, will not be affected. 221

16. Waiver: No delay or failure to require performance of any provision of this MOU shall constitute a waiver of that provision or any other. Any waiver granted by a party to this MOU shall be in writing.

17. Covenant: This MOU has been executed and delivered in the State of California, and the validity, enforceability and interpretation of any of the clauses of this MOU shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California.

18. Entire Agreement: This MOU supersedes all previous MOUs, agreements and negotiations, whether written or oral, and constitutes the entire understanding of the parties hereto. SHERIFF shall be entitled to no benefits other than those specified herein.

No changes, amendments or alterations shall be effective unless in writing and signed by all parties. CITY specifically acknowledges that in entering into and executing this MOU, CITY relies solely upon the provisions contained in this MOU and no others.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Memorandum of Understanding on the day and year first above written.

YREKA POLICE DEPARTMENT:

By: Date:

Mark Gilman, Chief of Police
SISKIYOU COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY:

By: Date:

Sarah Collard, Ph.D., Director

COUNTY OF SISKIYOU:

By: Date:

Angela Davis, County Administrator
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:

By: Date:

Edward J. Kiernan, County Counsel
222
APPROVED AS TO ACCOUNTING FORM:

Fund Org Account Actv NTE
By:

Diane Olson, Auditor-Controller
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS:

By:

Melissa Cummins, Personnel and Risk Management Officer
223
Exhibit “A”
The Yreka Police Department Homeless Liaison Officer will follow the Yreka Police Department Homeless Persons policy, 424
Duties and Responsibilities
The Yreka Police Department Homeless Liaison Officer is responsible for making connections between those experiencing homeless and the resources available to further their specific housing/service goals.

This includes, but is not limited to, making referrals to providers of housing/shelter programs, mental health treatment, substance use treatment, mainstream benefits, education, and employment training.

The Homeless Liaison Officer will maintain a level of skill and knowledge equivalent to that required for the Behavioral Health Specialist position within HHSA. If that is not possible, the officer will work in close coordination with a Behavioral Health Specialist from HHSA who provides crisis support, case management, and rehabilitation skills. The Homeless Liaison’s initial duties will include:
• Working a typical day shift patrol duty. The primary responsibility will be to respond to homeless and mental health related calls for service.
• Contacting the unhoused and establishing a rapport with them. • Offering support to the target population and learning about their needs/concerns. • Patrolling areas of the unhoused campsites and known resting locations. • Providing referrals to mental health evaluations.
• Maintaining partnerships with providers and current knowledge of resources for those who are homeless.
• Educating the target population on the resources available to those experiencing homelessness. • Sharing insights regarding the needs of the target population with the CoC Advisory Board. • Participating in the Homeless Multidisciplinary Team as requested by HHSA. • Assisting with the annual Point-in-Time Counts as requested by the CoC Advisory Board. And staffing warming shelters as the need arises.
• Collect program data as appropriate as well as updating the CoC board with the data.

The Homeless Liaison Officer will receive support from other staff in completing the above assignments.

The Yreka Police Department (YPD) plans to initially assign part-time Police Officers to this project as often as the Department’s capacity allows. After the program has established itself YPD intends to fill the position with full time Police Officer(s), as funding allows. The Homeless Liaison Officer and team members on the project will work under the supervision of the Chief of Police. 224
Billing
Billing will reflect the hours dedicated to the program. The Yreka Police Department will commit to the equivalent of 312 hours per month, 3,744 hours per year. The hours per year will be broken into four categories. The assigned Homeless Liaison Officer will work 1,560 hours per year. The assistant Homeless Liaison Officer will work 624 hours per year. Level 1 Reserve Police Officers will be assigned to assist the Homeless Liaison Officer for 1,040 hours per year. Full time patrol Police Officers will be assigned to 520 hours per year assisting the Homeless Liaison Officer on overtime.

In addition to the actual hours worked, mentioned above, there will be a yearly cost of a vehicle assigned to the Homeless Liaison Officer. The yearly cost of the vehicle is $9,250.00.

The listed hours and cost of a vehicle are slightly over the threshold provided with this MOU. The hours will be monitored by a Homeless Liaison Supervisor and may be adjusted. The reason for adjustments may be an emergency call out situation or miscellaneous needs as they arise. This would include being called in to staff a warming shelter, fire evacuations, training, etc. The Homeless Liaison Supervisor will adjust the hours throughout the year to stay within the budget.

The monthly costs of services to be performed are $13,333 per month, $160,000 per year. The Yreka Police Department agrees to monitor the hours worked and include that number in the monthly reports at the Continuum of Care meetings. Any cost above the threshold provided by this MOU will be paid by the Yreka Police Department overtime budget.

Training
The Homeless Liaison Officer will receive training from the Behavioral Health Division of HHSA, California POST approved trainers, as well as other relevant and approved trainings as necessary. The Homeless Liaison Officer will be required to complete the POST approved course of instruction within one year of accepting the assignment. For example, the Anaheim Police Department has successfully developed courses for a similar role that may be utilized. A screenshot of these trainings is included below. 225
City of Yreka Page 1 12/12//2022

CITY COUNCIL
Meets 1st and 3rd Tuesday of each month @ 6:30 pm
Corey Middleton, Mayor Paul McCoy, Mayor Pro-tempore
530.643.3353 530-340-3219
[email protected] Term Ex 11/2024 [email protected] Term Ex 11/2026 Colleen Baker Drake J. Davis
530-643-6445
[email protected] Term Ex 11/2026
530-643-9907
[email protected] Term Ex 11/2026
Duane Kegg
530-598-9663
[email protected] Term Ex 11/2024

YREKA PLANNING

COMMISSION
Meets 3rd Wednesday of each month at 5:30
Marlee Billingsley Peter O’Brien
[email protected] Term Ex 3/31/2026 [email protected] Term Ex 3/31/2023 Ann Ohlund Brian Devlin
[email protected] Term Ex 3/31/2026 [email protected] Term Ex 9/30/2025 Amy Fernandez
[email protected] Term Ex 9/30/2025
Finance Committee: City Manager, and Council Members: Paul McCoy and Joan Smith Freeman (2-year terms expires 1/2021) – Alternate -Mayor, Finance Director serves as liaison.

Fire Department Ad Hoc Committee – Paul McCoy and Duane Kegg (biannual appointment) – reporting out requirement to the full Council after each meeting (inception 10/22), City Clerk to take Minutes
Fire Safe Council -
Collier Interpretive and Information Center Agency: Deborah Baird – Alternate Duane Kegg.

Siskiyou County Regional Solid Waste Agency Joint Powers Authority – (Vacant) (Duane Kegg - alternate member)
Siskiyou County Integrated Waste Management Committee Members – Matt Bray (main) and Jason Lebetter (alternate)
Local Task Force Waste Management Committee – Matt Bray, Director of Public Works Siskiyou Association of Government Entities (SAGE) – Mayor serves as City’s SAGE representative, Mayor Pro-tempore serves as the Alternate. City Manager also attends.

Siskiyou County League of Local Agencies Board of Directors (LOLA) - Mayor Kegg Siskiyou County Local Transportation Commission (LTC) – Joan Smith Freeman, (2-year term thru 2021) Director of Public Works also attends. (Appointment made by City Selection Committee LOLA).

Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) – Deborah Baird (appointment made by City Selection Committee LOLA 1-9-19)
226
City of Yreka Page 2 12/12//2022
Historic District and Landmarks Commission duties reassigned to PC by Ordinance 828 as of January 1, 2012.

Executive Staff:

City Manager Finance Director
Jason Ledbetter 530-841-2321 Emily Aldrich 530-841-2323 [email protected] [email protected]
Human Resources Director Chief of Police
John Elsnab 530-841-2337 Mark Gilman 530-841-2300
[email protected] [email protected]
Director of Public Works Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Matt Bray 841-2319 Rhetta Hogan 530-841-2336
[email protected] [email protected]
Yreka Volunteer Fire Department Planning Director – Juliana Lucchesi Jerry Lemos, Chief 530-643-0903 [email protected] 530-841-2324 [email protected]
City Attorney
Dohn Henion
227

Yreka City CouncilDecember 20, 2022

Yreka City Council
December 20, 2022