Agenda — Yreka City Council, January 3, 2023

Page 1 of 5 ends

YREKA CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
January 3, 2023
Regular Session: 6:30 PM
Yreka City Council Chamber, 701 Fourth Street, Yreka, CA Regular Meetings of the Yreka City Council are held the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of every month.

The full agenda packet can be found on the City’s website: www.ci.yreka.ca.us/AgendaCenter

1. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND/OR ANNOUNCEMENTS:

This time slot is for informational presentations, appointments, or awards to be presented by the City Council or to the City Council.

3. PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Public participation is welcomed and invited at all City Council meetings. This time is set aside for residents to address the City Council on matters listed on the Consent Agenda as well as other items not included on the Regular Agenda. If your comments concern an item noted on the Regular Agenda, please address the Council when that item is open for public comment.

The City requests that persons addressing the City Council refrain from making personal, slanderous, profane, or disruptive remarks.

Join this meeting via Zoom:

Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6194957056
Meeting ID# 619-495-7056
Members of the public may also remotely listen to and participate in the meeting via teleconference. If you wish to listen or participate in this meeting through teleconference, simply dial into the conference number below, and enter the meeting ID#.

Conference call in Number: 669-900-6833 (Toll-Free 888 788 0099) “RAISE YOUR HAND” to provide public comment for your desired item. Speakers will be asked to identify themselves.
• Online: If you are online, click on “raise hand” on the bottom of your screen. • Mobile App: In the mobile app, you can raise your hand by tapping the "Raise Hand" option in the "More" tab.
• Telephone: If you are calling in via telephone, to raise your hand, dial *9 (star-nine). Speakers will be called on by the last four digits of their phone number. To unmute yourself dial *6 (star-six). 1

Page 2 of 5 ends

This time is set aside for citizens to address the City Council on matters listed on the Consent Agenda as well as other items not included on the Regular Agenda. If your comments concern an item noted on the Regular Agenda, please address the Council when that item is open for public comment. • Please speak into the microphone from the podium. The podium electronically adjusts up and down to accommodate speaker. (Should you need an additional special accommodation, e.g., remote microphone, please notice the City Clerk prior to the start of meeting for arrangements). • Please state your name for the record prior to providing your comments. • Please address the Council as a whole.
• If you have documents to present, please provide a minimum of seven (7) copies. • Please limit your remarks to five (5) minutes.

Public comments period is not intended to be a “Question and Answer” period or conversations with the Council or City staff.

4. PUBLIC COMMENT FOLLOW-UP:

This is the time for City Council or the City Manager to respond to public comments and may direct staff to prepare a report or place an item on a future agenda.

5. CONSENT AGENDA:

All matters listed under the consent agenda are considered routine and non-controversial and will be enacted by one motion unless any member of the Council wishes to remove an item for discussion, a. Approval/ratification of payments issued from December 12, 2022, through December 26, 2022. b. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting held December 20, 2022. c. Cash Balances, Investment and Fiscal Performance Reports for September 2022 d. Adopting a Corrected Appropriations Limit, Resolution 2023-01, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. e. Resolution 2023-02 Recognizing the City of Yreka’s 2023 Contribution to Employees Healthcare Costs through the IRS Section 125 Cafeteria Plan.
f. Continuation of Urgency Resolution #2021-51: Remote Public Meetings. g. Continuation of Urgency Ordinance #864: Fireworks.
h. Waive Full Text Reading of All Ordinances on the Agenda. Ordinances shall be introduced and adopted by title only.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopt the Consent Agenda of the City Council of the City of Yreka as presented.

6. OLD BUSINESS
Planning Director
a. Agenda Title: California Housing and Community Development, Prohousing Designation Program Note: This resolution was deferred to the Jan. 3, 2023, City Council meeting from Dec. 20, 2022.

City Staff has developed an application to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for a “Prohousing Designation”. The Prohousing Housing Designation identifies local policies that jurisdictions are adopting to address housing needs and affordability and identifies State programs and grants for which Prohousing designated jurisdictions should receive preference or additional points. City Staff are requesting City Council review of the proposed activities to achieve a Pro Housing Designation and authorize the submittal of the application to HCD. 2

Page 3 of 5 ends

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to approve Resolution CCR-2022-59 A Resolution of the City of Yreka City Council Authorizing Application to and Participation in the Prohousing Designation Program.

7. NEW BUSINESS:

Public Works Director and City Manager
a. Agenda Title: Request to Hire Two additional Parks Maintenance Workers and Authorize a Supplemental Budgetary Appropriation for the positions
Public Works is requesting the additional hire of two parks maintenance workers to assist with the upkeep and maintenance of Yreka’s over 600 acres of parks and greenways. The employees would be paid for from the Greenhorn Reservoir Water and General Fund accounts.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion that the City Council Approve the Request to Hire two additional Parks Maintenance Workers and Authorize a Supplemental Budgetary Appropriation for the positions.
b. Agenda Title: Resolution Designating Reserves from Gain on Sale of Real Property to fund a 95% Completion Study for Preliminary Design and Engineering of the Ringe Park and Pool Complex, an estimated cost of $500,000 to $750,000 and Authorizing the City Manager to issue a Request for Proposal/Qualifications for engineering and architectural design services.

The City has since 2021 realized one time money, gains recognized on the sale (and potential sale) of City owned properties. The City Manager and Public Works Director are requesting the designation of those reserves realized from sale of real property to be dedicated to the Ringe Park and Pool Complex to obtain engineering and architectural plans, that are “shovel ready” for construction bid and available grant opportunities where the City and project may be eligible applicant. Additionally, the resolution authorizes the City Manager or his designee to issue a request for proposal or qualifications for engineering and architectural services. The budget for these services is estimated to be somewhere between the range of $500,000 and $750,000 for a 95% completion study.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopt a Resolution 2023-03 Designating Reserves from Gain on Sale of Real Property to fund a 95% Completion Study for Preliminary Design and Engineering of the Ringe Park and Pool Complex, an estimated cost of $500,000 to $750,000, and Authorizing the City Manager to issue a Request for Proposal/Qualifications for engineering and architectural design services.

Police Chief
c. Agenda Title: Restructuring the Response to Animal Control Calls for Services to ensure 24/7 coverage, expand training and provide more versatile resources at Yreka Police Department – by hiring a sworn Patrol Officer in lieu of an Animal Control Officer (currently a vacant position).

Police Chief Gilman is requesting to transition the vacant Animal Control Officer position into a sworn Police Officer position. The reason for this is call volume statistics. In evaluating options to perform effective patrol, including ACO functions, I feel can more effectively utilize a more versatile sworn Police Officer (through all shifts), instead of dedicating a M-F 8AM-5PM full-time position for an Animal Control Officer.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Approve Restructuring the Response to Animal Control Calls for Services to ensure 24/7 coverage, expand training and provide more versatile 3

Page 4 of 5 ends

resources at Yreka Police Department – by hiring a sworn Patrol Officer in lieu of an Animal Control Officer (currently a vacant position).

8. MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBERS REPORTS
AB 1234* Conference and Meeting Report (verbal, if any) *(In accordance with AB 1234, Councilmembers shall make a brief report or file a written report on any meeting/event/conference attended at City expense.)

9. CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS:

City Manager and Staff may make brief announcements or reports at this time.

Mark Gilman and Jason Ledbetter will give an update on shopping cart retrieval code enforcement efforts.

10. COUNCILMEMBER STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS:

Members of the Council may make brief announcements, reports, or request staff to report to Council on any matter at a subsequent meeting.

11. ADJOURNMENT:

In compliance with the requirements of the Brown Act, notice of this meeting has been posted in a publicly accessible place, 72 hours in advance of the meeting.

All documents produced by the City which are related to an open session agenda item and distributed to the City Council are made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office during normal business hours.

Public Hearings: If, in the future, you wish to challenge in court any of the matters on an agenda for which a public hearing is to be conducted, you may be limited to raising only those issues which you (or someone else) raised orally at the public hearing or in written correspondence received by the City at or before the hearing. Any person seeking to challenge a City Council decision made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes “final.”
"CHALLENGING DECISIONS OF CITY ENTITIES The time limit within which to commence any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City of Yreka is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, unless a shorter limitation period is specified by any other provision, including without limitation Government Code section 65009 applicable to many land use and zoning decisions, Government Code section 66499.37 applicable to the Subdivision Map Act, and Public Resources Code section 21167 applicable to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Under Section 1094.6, any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which such decision becomes final. Any lawsuit or legal challenge, which is not filed within that 90-day period, will be barred. Government Code section 65009 and 66499.37, and Public Resources Code section 21167, impose shorter limitations periods and requirements, including timely service in addition to filing. If a person wishes to challenge the above actions in court, they may be limited to raising only those issues they or someone else raised at the meeting described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Yreka, at or prior to the meeting. In addition, judicial challenge may be limited or barred where the interested party has not sought and exhausted all available administrative remedies." The City of Yreka does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, age, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or any other legally protected classes in employment or provision of services. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, those requiring accommodations for this meeting should notify the City Clerk 48 hours prior to the meeting at (530) 841-2386 or by notifying the Clerk at [email protected].

AFFIDAVIT OF NOTIFICATION AND POSTING

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
4

Page 5 of 5 ends

COUNTY OF SISKIYOU) SS

CITY OF YREKA )
I, Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk for the City of Yreka, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that a copy of the above Agenda of the Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Yreka, California, was delivered and/or notice by email not less than 72 hours, before the hour of 5:30 p.m. on January 3, 2023 to the members of the governing agency, and caused the agenda to be posted on the City’s website at www.ci.yreka.ca.us and posted at Yreka City Hall, 701 Fourth St., Yreka, California. /s/: Rhetta Hogan
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27

Page 1 of 8 ends

MINUTES OF THE YREKA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
HELD ON DECEMBER 20, 2022
Yreka City Council Chamber, 701 Fourth Street, Yreka, CA On December 20, 2022, the City Council of Yreka, met for a Special meeting at 5:30 p.m. and Regular meeting at 6:30 p.m. and upon roll call, the following Councilmembers were present: Colleen Baker, Drake Davis, Duane Kegg, Paul McCoy, and Corey Middleton.

1. CALL TO ORDER:

2. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION:

3. CLOSED SESSION:

The City Council will recess to Closed Session to discuss the following item(s). At the conclusion of the Closed Session, Open Session will reconvene and reportable action, if any, will be announced:
a. Conference with Real Property Negotiations (§ 54956.8) Property: APN 062-031-250 (0.88-acre parcel), and APN 062-031-200 (2.08-acre parcel).

Third Party Negotiation: Nor-Cal Products by Pfeiffer Vacuum City Negotiation: City Manager and City Attorney
Negotiating Parties: City of Yreka and Nor-Cal Products by Pfeiffer Vacuum Under Negotiation: Possible purchase agreement including price, terms of payment, or both.
b. Conference with Real Property Negotiations (§ 54956.8) Property: Fall Creek Water Diversion Facilities
Third Party Negotiation: Klamath River Renewal Corporation (KRRC) City Negotiation: City Manager and City Attorney
Negotiating Parties: City of Yreka and KRRC
Under Negotiation: Agreement on Payment for Past Expenses Related to the Potential Impacts of Lower Klamath Project on the City of Yreka’s Water Diversion Facilities.
c. Conference with Labor Negotiator Government Code § 54957.6(a) Agency negotiators: City Manager Ledbetter, Assistant City Manager Hogan, Human Resources Director Elsnab
Employee Organization: Yreka Management Association

4. OPTIONAL RECESS IF DESIRED:

5. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 6:30 PM:

Announcement of any action taken by the City Council in Closed Session required by the Ralph M. Brown Act. (Government Code § 54950 et. seq.)
28

Page 2 of 8 ends

No reportable action.

6. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

7. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND/OR ANNOUNCEMENTS:

This time slot is for informational presentations, appointments, or awards to be presented by the City Council or to the City Council.

Recognition of Outgoing Planning Commissioners and Swearing in of Incoming Planning Commissioners.

Ann Ohlund was sworn in as incoming planning commissioner.

8. PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Public participation is welcomed and invited at all City Council meetings. Time is reserved at each regular meeting for those in the audience who wish to address the City Council. The City requests that persons addressing the City Council refrain from making personal, slanderous, profane, or disruptive remarks.

Councilmembers, when recognized by the Mayor, may ask questions of presenter but no action may be taken by the City Council during the public comment section of the meeting. Under the Brown Act, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not listed on the posted agenda. • Please speak into the microphone from the podium. The podium electronically adjusts up and down to accommodate speaker. (Should you need an additional special accommodation, e.g., remote microphone, please notify the City Clerk prior to the start of meeting for arrangements). • Please state your name for the record prior to providing your comments. • Please address the Council as a whole.
• If you have documents to present, please provide a minimum of seven (7) copies. • Please limit your remarks to five (5) minutes.

Public comments period is not intended to be a “Question and Answer” period or conversations with the Council or City staff.

Public Comment: Davis Guy Scott, Jerry Stacher, Dawnmarie Autrey, Robin Richards, Mark Atwood, (City Manager Jason Ledbetter stated he had received an email to read into record for public comments but was unable to read as it involves an active investigation by YPD).

9. PUBLIC COMMENT FOLLOW-UP:

This is the time for City Council or the City Manager to respond to public comments and may direct staff to prepare a report or place an item on a future agenda.

No direction for follow up was given to the City Manager.

10. CONSENT AGENDA:

Page 3 of 8 ends

d. Approval of the Transportation Claim for the Local Transportation Fund for Fiscal Year 2022/23 and Authorizing the Mayor to Sign the Claim on Behalf of the City. e. Adopt a Resolution 2022-55 naming Emily Aldrich, Finance Director as a City delegate who is eligible to review confidential sales tax data with HdL. f. Cash Balances, Investment and Fiscal Performance Reports for June 2022. g. Cash Balances and Fiscal Performance Reports for July 2022. h. Cash Balances and Fiscal Performance Reports for August 2022. i. Approval of 2021-22 Closing Budget Revisions.
j. Continuation of Urgency Ordinance #864: Fireworks.
k. Continuation of Urgency Resolution #2021-51: Remote Public Meetings. l. Waive Full Text Reading of All Ordinances on the Agenda. Ordinances shall be introduced and adopted by title only.

Recommended City Council Action (after the Mayor’s request for public comment): Motion to Adopt the Consent Agenda of the City Council of the City of Yreka as presented.

No Public Comment.

Motion to Adopt the Consent Agenda of the City Council of the City of Yreka as presented.

MOTIONED: Councilmember Davis
SECONDED: Councilmember Baker
AYES: Councilmembers Baker, Davis, Kegg McCoy, and Middleton NOES: None
ABSENT: None

11. OLD BUSINESS
Human Resources Director
a. Agenda Title: Approval of the Yreka Employees’ Association (YEA) Memorandum of Understanding
Representatives for the City and YEA have met and agreed upon compensation over the next thirty months for wages, benefits (including healthcare coverage) and other compensation (like callout pay, remote pay and deferred compensation).

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopt a Resolution 2022-56 of the City Council of the City of Yreka approving execution of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Yreka and the Yreka Employee’s Association.

No Public Comment.

Motion to Adopt a Resolution 2022-56 of the City Council of the City of Yreka approving execution of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Yreka and the Yreka Employee’s Association.

MOTIONED: Councilmember Kegg
SECONDED: Councilmember Baker
AYES: Councilmembers Baker, Davis, Kegg McCoy, and Middleton NOES: None
ABSENT: None
b. Agenda Title: Approval of the City of Yreka Compensation Resolution for Unrepresented Employees (Department Heads).
30

Page 4 of 8 ends

The City Manager has met with Labor Consultant to recognize wage and benefit compensation for Department Heads over the next thirty months for wages, benefits (includes healthcare coverage) and other compensation (like deferred compensation), incorporating many of the provisions that were afforded to other represented units within the City.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopt a Compensation Resolution 2022-57 of the City Council of the City of Yreka for Unrepresented Employees (Department Heads).

Public Comment: Ron Copeland
Motion to Adopt a Compensation Resolution 2022-57 of the City Council of the City of Yreka for Unrepresented Employees (Department Heads).

MOTIONED: Councilmember Kegg
SECONDED: Councilmember Middleton
AYES: Councilmembers Baker, Davis, Kegg McCoy, and Middleton NOES: None
ABSENT: None

12. PUBLIC HEARINGS:

Public Hearing Protocol:
i. Mayor will describe the purpose of the Public Hearing. ii. City Staff will provide the Staff Report.
iii. City Staff will respond to questions from the City Council. iv. Mayor will open the Public Hearing.
v. Public wanting to comment will come to the podium, provide the City Clerk with their name and address, and provide their comments.
vi. Mayor will close the Public Hearing.
vii. City Council will deliberate and act on the item.

Finance Director/Assistant City Manager
a. Agenda Title: Approving the Development Impact Fee Report and Updating the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee (Rate) Program i. The City is reporting on its annual collection and use of fee revenue received during the fiscal year 2021-2022.
ii. As part of the annual report to the public on developer impact (connection) fees the City asked Pace Engineering to review its connection fees for water and wastewater utilities. The report from Paul Reuter, PACE Engineering evaluated both the water and wastewater systems. The report remediated the lack of a sewer treatment plant connection fee and updated the rates to reflect anticipated growth and Capital Improvements Plan for the water and wastewater system.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to approve City Council Resolution 2022-58 approving the Development Impact Fee Report and Updating the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee (Rate) Program.

Public Comment: Dawnmarie Autrey
Motion to approve City Council Resolution 2022-58 approving the Development Impact Fee Report and Updating the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee (Rate) Program.

MOTIONED: Councilmember McCoy
SECONDED: Councilmember Baker
AYES: Councilmembers Baker, Davis, Kegg McCoy, and Middleton NOES: None
31

Page 5 of 8 ends

ABSENT: None

13. NEW BUSINESS:

Planning Director
a. Agenda Title: California Housing and Community Development, Prohousing Designation Program City Staff has developed an application to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for a “Prohousing Designation”. The Prohousing Housing Designation identifies local policies that jurisdictions are adopting to address housing needs and affordability and identifies State programs and grants for which Prohousing designated jurisdictions should receive preference or additional points. City Staff are requesting City Council review of the proposed activities to achieve a Pro Housing Designation and authorize the submittal of the application to HCD.

Public Comment: Louise Gliatto, Ms Bacigalopi, Jerry Stacher City Council directed the item to be tabled at the current meeting and requested that the item be brought back to the January 3, 2023, City Council meeting.
b. Agenda Title: Regional Early Action Program (REAP) 2.0 Grant Application City staff in collaboration with Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. (city’s on-call planning contractor) have prepared two recommended activities for the REAP 2.0 grant application:

1. Comprehensive update to the City’s zoning, development, and subdivision regulations

2. Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for General Plan and code updates Recommended City Council Action: Motion to approve Resolution 2022-60 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka Authorizing the City Manager to Submit a REAP 2.0 Grant Application on Behalf of the City of Yreka with Selected Project Activities.

Public Comment, Debbie Baird, Louise Gliatto
Motion to approve Resolution 2022-60 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka Authorizing the City Manager to Submit a REAP 2.0 Grant Application on Behalf of the City of Yreka with Selected Project Activities.

MOTIONED: Councilmember Kegg
SECONDED: Councilmember Davis
AYES: Councilmembers Baker, Davis, Kegg McCoy, and Middleton NOES: None
ABSENT: None
City Manager/City Attorney
c. Agenda Title: Agreement on Payment for Past Expenses Related to Potential Impacts of Lower Klamath Project on the City of Yreka’s Water Diversion Facilities The City of Yreka incurred expenses for activities of its City Attorney and a technical consultant, Ms. Gretchen Umlauf, to prepare a Habitat Conservation Plan as a potential method for compliance with respect to the diversion facilities; and the City Attorney has provided the KRRC with appropriate documentation of such expenses.
32

Page 6 of 8 ends

This resolution and agreement, cooperatively seeks to compensate the City to a large extent for its costs and enters into this agreement willingly as the City of Yreka and the KRRC did not have an agreement in place at the time that the City incurred such expenses.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopted a Resolution 2022-61 of the City Council of the City of Yreka to Approve the Agreement on Payment for Past Expenses Related to Potential Impacts of Lower Klamath Project on the City of Yreka’s Water Diversion Facilities No Public Comment
Motion to Adopted a Resolution 2022-61 of the City Council of the City of Yreka to Approve the Agreement on Payment for Past Expenses Related to Potential Impacts of Lower Klamath Project on the City of Yreka’s Water Diversion Facilities.

MOTIONED: Councilmember McCoy
SECONDED: Councilmember Kegg
AYES: Councilmembers Baker, Davis, Kegg McCoy, and Middleton NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Police Chief
d. Agenda Title: Procurement of Sun Ridge RIMS/CAD software, as sole source provider, for Yreka Police Department and utilizing the City’s Federal Asset Forfeiture reserves.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Approve Resolution 2022-62 Approving and Authorizing as Sole Source Provider, the Procurement of Sun Ridge Systems Software and the necessary related hardware and allow for the execution of all necessary documents for the purchase.

No Public Comment
Motion that the City Council Approve Resolution 2022-62 Approving and Authorizing as Sole Source Provider, the Procurement of Sun Ridge Systems Software and the necessary related hardware and allow for the execution of all necessary documents for the purchase.

MOTIONED: Councilmember Baker
SECONDED: Councilmember Kegg
AYES: Councilmembers Baker, Davis, Kegg, McCoy, and Middleton NOES: None
ABSENT: None
e. Agenda Title: Memorandum of Understanding between the Siskiyou County Health and Human Services and the City of Yreka Police Department for Homeless Liaison Officer services.

The Yreka Police Chief and Siskiyou County Health and Human Services Agency have met to address the needs to mutually serve the City’s unhoused, homeless population. The result of these meetings is a cooperative MOU agreement for specialized police services. The term of the agreement is retroactive from October 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, or until terminated by either party.

The agreement would compensate the City $160,000 annually for the services of a Homeless Liaison Officer. The Yreka Police Department Homeless Liaison Officer(s) is responsible for making connections between those experiencing homelessness and the resources available to further their specific housing and services goals. This includes, but is not limited to, making referrals to providers of housing/shelter programs, mental health treatment, substance use treatment, mainstream benefits, 33

Page 7 of 8 ends

education, and employment training. Additionally, the Homeless Liaison Officer will also provide a monthly report to the Continuum of Care (CoC) Advisory Board.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopt a Resolution 2022-63 authorizing the City Manager or his delegate to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the Siskiyou County Health and Human Services and the City of Yreka Police Department for Homeless Liaison Officer Services
Public Comment Louise Gliatto
Motion to Adopt a Resolution 2022-63 authorizing the City Manager or his delegate to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the Siskiyou County Health and Human Services and the City of Yreka Police Department for Homeless Liaison Officer Services MOTIONED: Councilmember Kegg
SECONDED: Councilmember Davis
AYES: Councilmembers Baker, Davis, Kegg McCoy, and Middleton NOES: None
ABSENT: None
City Council Committee Appointments
f. Agenda Title: Mayor’s committee appointments.

Mayor will announce committee member selections for various working committees where a Councilmember is a member representing the City of Yreka.

Finance Committee: Mayor Pro Tempore Paul McCoy, and Colleen Baker Fire Department Ad Hoc: Mayor Pro Tempore Paul McCoy, and Duane Kegg Fire Safe Council: Drake Davis
Collier Interpretive and Information Center: Deborah Baird, Colleen Baker *Alternate* All Solid Waste Committees: Matt Bray, Jason Ledbetter *Alternate* Siskiyou Association of Government Entities (SAGE): Mayor Corey Middleton and Mayor Pro Tempore Paul McCoy *Alternate*
Siskiyou County League of Local Agencies Board of Directors (LOLA): Mayor Corey Middleton Siskiyou County Local Transportation Commission (LTC): Mayor Pro Tempore Paul McCoy Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO): Colleen Baker

14. MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBERS REPORTS
AB 1234* Conference and Meeting Report (verbal, if any) *(In accordance with AB 1234, Councilmembers shall make a brief report or file a written report on any meeting/event/conference attended at City expense.)

15. CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS:

City Manager and Staff may make brief announcements or reports at this time.

City Manager, Jason Ledbetter, congratulated the City Council on their first meeting, “spectacular”.

Fire Chief Lemos commented that the Santa Run was very successful.

16. COUNCILMEMBER STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS:

Members of the Council may make brief announcements, reports, or request staff to report to Council on any matter at a subsequent meeting.
34

Page 8 of 8 ends

Kegg announced that the Continuum of Care point-in-time count for the unhoused and homeless planning is in progress and that the count will happen on Jan 25, 2023. McCoy also spoke to the event scheduled for Jan. 25, and many individuals helping on this event.
*Kegg requested to move City Council meeting date from Tuesday to Thursday and asked for that item to be brought back to the City Council.
*Kegg requested an update on shopping cart retrievals at next City Council meeting.

Davis report on his Fall Creek trip and water system with Public Works Director, Matt Bray.

Davis, Baker, Middleton all reported on attending the shop with a COP event at WalMart last week. *Baker requested a report from the SCEDC on the Night of Lights event and budget on related expenditures. *McCoy requested communications follow up in strategic planning or through an ad hoc committee.

McCoy expressed sympathy to the families of the deceased individuals found Sunday night, Monday morning.

McCoy thanked community volunteers and activism for on the unsheltered, and public safety.

McCoy announced the Yreka Volunteer Fire Department (YVFD) Fundraiser is coming up in January of 2023.

McCoy thanked the Gilman family for purchasing Luna a bulletproof vest, commented on his scheduled ride along planned in January with Sergeant Hasemeyer and Luna.

McCoy is looking forward to future strategic planning with the City Council.

McCoy thanked Jessica Skillen on work with Public Health. *Middleton requested Boutin recognition for his efforts for organizing the Siskiyou County Shop with a Cop Program
Middleton participated in the YVFD Santa Run handing out gifts.

Middleton attended YPD Christmas party.

17. ADJOURNMENT:

There being no more business the City Council meeting adjourned at 10:09 p.m.

____________________
Corey Middleton, Mayor
Minutes approved by City Council,
Motion January 3, 2023
______________________
Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk
35 Fund Type Fund Fund Description Previous Balance
Receipts /
Debits
Disbursements /
Credits
Cash Balance by
Fund
General-Unrestricted 01 General Operating $ 7,748,656.46 $ 560,494.92 $ 619,676.85 $ 7,689,474.53 General-Designated 01 General Oper. - Other - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Comm Art - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Fire Museum 3,322.35 - - 3,322.35 General-Designated 01 Planning Deposits - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Sidewalk in Lieu 39,278.46 - - 39,278.46 General-Designated 01 Parkland Trust 300.00 - - 300.00
General-Designated 01 Police Asset Forfeit 12,239.86 - - 12,239.86 General-Designated 01 Parking Fees - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Campbell Tract Redemption - - - 0.00 General-Designated 02 Gifts Donations 25,866.13 - 214.40 25,651.73 General-Designated 02 K-9 Unit - - - 0.00
General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Hitson 4,624.59 370.76 181.43 4,813.92 General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Travellers 741.68 - - 741.68 General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Teen Fund 3,956.43 - - 3,956.43 General-Designated 03 YVFD Volunter Fund 2,511.32 272.91 545.82 2,238.41 General-Restricted 04 Crandell Cash 438,949.24 4,355.21 2,116.71 441,187.74 General-Restricted 05 Property Abatement Recovery 58,046.49 - - 58,046.49 General-Designated 08 Grant Projects Reserve 1,330,475.56 3,610.17 1,334,085.73 - General-Designated 08 PERS Pension Liability Reserve - - - 0.00 General-Designated 09 Reserves for Cap. Outlay 831,125.62 - - 831,125.62 General-Designated 10 Capital Outlay 256,310.14 - 14,488.79 241,821.35 General-Designated 11 Capital Building Project - YPD (226.18) - 582.80 (808.98) General - All General-Designated 12 Debt Servicing - GF (YPD Bldg) 323,073.14 - - 323,073.14 General-Designated 12 Debt Servicing Reserves - GF (YPD Bldg) 200,000.00 - - 200,000.00 General-Designated 90 Payroll Clearing (815,019.33) 649,902.56 538,122.47 (703,239.24) 10,507,309.22 $ Spec. Rev. -Streets 20 Road and Street Funds including HUTA 452,671.17 73,696.33 275,369.01 250,998.49 Spec. Rev. -Streets 21 Local Transportation 374,962.64 3,716.20 1,808.15 376,870.69 Streets Spec. Rev. -Streets 24 Fines - Traffic Safety 201,755.96 3,084.41 3,033.53 201,806.84 829,676.02 $ Special Revenue 30 Fire Assessment Spec. Rev 1,068,333.65 36,477.32 12,812.04 1,091,998.93 Special Revenue 31 Landfill Access Fee - Debt Service (105,415.65) 19,669.22 776.81 (86,523.24) Special Revenues Special Revenue 32 Developer Impact Fees 219,677.62 2,164.72 1,059.30 220,783.04 $ 1,226,258.73 Special Grants 60 Spec Grants Capital Outlay 1,605,614.82 162,811.22 103,283.36 1,665,142.68 Special Grants Special Grants 65 Community Development Grants 920,185.61 10,018.68 5,233.80 924,970.49 SpecialOperating 67 SUMIT Operating 702,929.95 - - 702,929.95 $ 3,293,043.12 Water Enterprise 70 Water Operating 89,650.97 357,132.04 283,970.04 162,812.97 Water Enterprise 71 Water Capital Projects (675,336.32) 459,352.92 1,258,514.52 (1,474,497.92) Water Enterprise 72 Water Debt Servicing 713,574.72 - 7,187.66 706,387.06 Water Enterprise 72 USDA COPS 2010 300,000.00 - - 300,000.00 Water Enterprise Water Enterprise 74 Water Reserves 5,133,857.59 130,596.94 26,182.46 5,238,272.07 $ 4,932,974.18 Sewer Enterprise 80 Sewer Operating 451,404.13 234,564.95 195,185.25 490,783.83 Sewer Enterprise 81 Sewer Capital Outlay 64,514.23 177,788.10 - (113,273.87) Sewer Enterprise 82 Sewer Debt Servicing 458,720.98 0.02 - 458,721.00 Sewer Enterprise 82 USDA COPS 2003 250,000.00 - - 250,000.00 Enterprise-Sewer Sewer Enterprise 84 Sewer Reserves 4,803,518.47 118,729.91 28,887.28 4,893,361.10 $ 5,979,592.06 Agency
Agency 92 Agency SUMIT - Cash 19,219.01 0.48 - 19,219.49 $ 19,219.49 COLUMN TOTALS $ 27,514,071.51 $ 2,831,021.89 $ 3,557,020.58 $ 26,788,072.82 $ 26,788,072.82 -
BANK RECAPITULATION PER BANK Market Value Unrealized Gain PER LEDGER L.A.I.F. 0.861% 22,012,280.57 21,728,881.57 (283,399.00) Pershing Bank - CD & Treas Investments 2,452,000.00 2,393,811.53 (58,188.47) Pershing Bank - Cash 245,798.77
Petty Cash Drawers 1,200.00
YVFD Petty Cash -
Banner Bank (DDA for Bank Anticipation Note 1,348.48
MB SUMIT Operating x2233 705,233.99
MB SUMIT Asset Forfeiture X4281 19,219.49
Mechanics Bank - 01015102 1,515,789.84
TOTAL PER BANK 26,952,871.14

ADJUSTMENTS
Less Outstanding Checks MB (244,303.96)
Less Outstanding Checks SVB SUMIT (2,304.04)
Interest CR (GL ) September 2022 (12.95)
Transfer 9/30 - Posted 10/03 at Bank 2,947.75
Transfer 9/29 - Posted 10/04 at Bank 2,573.56
Returned Check - L.B. (15.72)
Returned Check - P. S. (108.44)
Returned Check - T. O (275.31)
Pers Rounding (0.05)
Reconciling 5.40
BRMS Card 2.06
CalPERS Health Admin Fee BP Rate Adj (9.98)
CalPERS Health Admin Fee BP Rate Adj 6.10
PERS 2.09
Unreconciled Diff (1,198.28)
LAIF Interest 77,893.45
TOTAL PER LEDGER 26,788,072.82 26,788,072.82
(0.00)
Corey Middleton, City Mayor
Emily Aldrich, Finance Director

CITY OF YREKA

REPORT ON CASH TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Sep-2022
36 2022-2023 Operating Budget of Revenue and Expenditures with Year to Date Actual Results September 30, 2022
Fund AnalysisMajor Grp Fund Adopted Operating Budget Year to Date 3 Adopted Operating Budget Year to Date 4 Operating Budget Net Actual
Year to Date
Current Cash
Balance
Investment in LAIF 00 - - - - - - -
General Operating 01 7,474,244.57 7,923,861.07 1,707,710.04 7,854,692.39 7,854,692.39 1,910,193.15 (202,483.11) 69,168.68 7,755,039.32 General Operating Fund 7,474,244.57 7,923,861.07 1,707,710.04 7,854,692.39 7,854,692.39 1,910,193.15 69,168.68 (202,483.11) 7,755,039.32 Gifts Donations 02 - - 10,307.43 700.00 700.00 2,860.50 (700.00) 7,446.93 35,157.76 YVFD Volunter Fund 03 13,500.00 13,500.00 - 13,500.00 13,500.00 392.26 - (392.26) 2,238.41Trusts -Crandell-Stewart 04 - - 2,238.50 2,050.00 2,050.00 - (2,050.00) 2,238.50 441,065.95 Property Abatement 05 - - - - - 500.00 - (500.00) 58,046.49 General Fund Reserves 08 - - 52,098.17 - - - - 52,098.17 1,334,085.73 Reserves for Cap. Outlay 09 - - - - - - - - 831,125.62
Capital Outlay 10 82,500.00 82,500.00 - 82,500.00 82,500.00 (43,770.35) - 43,770.35 241,821.35 Construction Fund 11 - - - - - 696.24 - (696.24) (808.98) General Fund Debt Servicing 12 125,895.00 125,895.00 - 125,895.00 125,895.00 (23,021.25) - 23,021.25 523,073.14 Payroll Clearing 90 (764,015.98) (764,015.98) 124,651.76 - - 39,822.10 (764,015.98) 84,829.66 (701,864.69) General Fund - Restricted or Designated (542,120.98) (542,120.98) 189,295.86 224,645.00 224,645.00 (22,520.50) (766,765.98) 211,816.36 2,763,940.78 Total General Fund 6,932,123.59 7,381,740.09 1,897,005.90 8,079,337.39 8,079,337.39 1,887,672.65 (697,597.30) 9,333.25 10,518,980.10Gas Tax & Traffic Cong. 20 954,702.40 954,702.40 132,954.27 954,702.44 954,702.44 269,065.89 (0.04) (136,111.62) 250,767.82 Local Transportation 21 200,000.00 200,000.00 1,908.05 200,000.00 200,000.00 - - 1,908.05 376,770.79 Fines - Traffic Safety 24 68,164.14 68,164.14 5,158.70 68,164.14 68,164.14 9,100.18 - (3,941.48) 201,745.62 Road, Street & Transit - Restricted 1,222,866.54 1,222,866.54 140,021.02 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 278,166.07 (0.04) (138,145.05) 829,284.23 Total Road, Streets and Transit 1,222,866.54 1,222,866.54 140,021.02 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 278,166.07 (0.04) (138,145.05) 829,284.23 Fire Assessment Spec. Rev 30 307,500.00 307,500.00 84,990.04 105,726.24 105,726.24 22,681.56 201,773.76 62,308.48 1,091,705.58 Landfill Access Fee - Debt Service 31 240,000.00 240,000.00 60,263.97 240,000.01 240,000.01 176,875.63 (0.01) (116,611.66) (86,523.24) Developer Impact Fees 32 16,000.00 16,000.00 1,328.40 9,500.00 9,500.00 - 6,500.00 1,328.40 220,736.92 Special Revenue - Restricted 563,500.00 563,500.00 146,582.41 355,226.25 355,226.25 199,557.19 208,273.75 (52,974.78) 1,225,919.26 Total Special Revenue 563,500.00 563,500.00 146,582.41 355,226.25 355,226.25 199,557.19 208,273.75 (52,974.78) 1,225,919.26 Spec Grants Capital Outlay 60 - - - 2,249,000.00 2,249,000.00 99,670.52 (2,249,000.00) (99,670.52) 1,665,142.68Community Development Grants 65 2,249,000.00 2,249,000.00 162,811.22 800,750.00 800,750.00 (1,273.41) 1,448,250.00 164,084.63 924,722.14 SUMIT Operating Fund 67 750,600.00 750,600.00 4,880.58 - - - 750,600.00 4,880.58 702,929.95 Special Grants - Capital Projects 2,999,600.00 2,999,600.00 167,691.80 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 98,397.11 (50,150.00) 69,294.69 3,292,794.77 Special Grants - Operating & Capital Projects 2,999,600.00 2,999,600.00 167,691.80 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 98,397.11 (50,150.00) 69,294.69 3,292,794.77 Water Operating 70 - - - 2,585,884.53 2,585,884.53 579,279.42 (579,279.42) (2,585,884.53) 162,812.97 Water Capital Projects 71 2,585,884.55 2,585,884.55 805,926.47 2,853,117.00 7,873,117.00 1,474,497.92 (668,571.45) (5,287,232.45) (1,474,497.92) Water Debt Servicing 72 2,853,117.00 7,873,117.00 - 349,238.17 349,238.17 (93,016.15) 93,016.15 7,523,878.83 1,006,387.06 Water Reserves 74 356,738.17 356,738.17 - - - - - 356,738.17 5,236,627.35 Water Enterprise 5,795,739.72 10,815,739.72 805,926.47 5,788,239.70 10,808,239.70 1,960,761.19 7,500.02 (1,154,834.72) 4,931,329.46Sewer Operating 80 (916,687.72) (1,197,687.72) 129,321.97 2,360,449.97 2,360,449.97 440,160.34 (3,558,137.69) (310,838.37) 490,783.83 Sewer Capital Outlay 81 2,360,449.98 2,360,449.98 540,011.28 9,326,680.00 9,518,080.00 377,132.30 (7,157,630.02) 162,878.98 (113,273.87) Sewer Debt Servicing 82 9,326,680.00 9,326,680.00 263,858.43 316,855.00 316,855.00 (1,168.75) 9,009,825.00 265,027.18 708,721.00 Sewer Reserves 84 318,855.00 318,855.00 (263,858.41) - - - 318,855.00 (263,858.41) 4,891,640.05 Sewer Enterprise Fund 11,089,297.26 10,808,297.26 669,333.27 12,003,984.97 12,195,384.97 816,123.89 (1,387,087.71) (146,790.62) 5,977,871.01Total Enterprise Funds 16,885,036.98 21,624,036.98 1,475,259.74 17,792,224.67 23,003,624.67 2,776,885.08 (1,379,587.69) (1,301,625.34) 10,909,200.47 SUMIT Agency Trust - Cash 92 - - - - - - - - 19,219.49
Agency Funds - - - - - - - - 19,219.49 \
Total Agency Funds - - - - - - - - 19,219.49
All Funds Combined 33,791,743.61 28,603,127.11 3,826,560.87 30,499,404.89 35,710,804.89 5,240,678.10 (1,919,061.28) (1,414,117.23) 26,795,398.32 Excess of Rev over Exp.-Surplus/
R E V E N U E E X P E N S E (Deficit)
Approval:______________________________________________________Corey Middleton, Mayor 12/27/2022 9:48 AM 37 City of Yreka Financial Statement Groupings
Summary FY 22-23 YTD Fiscal Performance
as of September 30, 2022
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt

1. GENERAL FUNDSRevenue
801 REVENUE: PROP TAXES 1,208,650.00 1,208,650.00 100,010.92 -1,108,639.08807 MVLF IN LIEU 650,000.00 0.00 -650,000.00 650,000.00810 SALES TAX 3,600,000.00 1,031,451.64 -2,568,548.36 3,600,000.00813 REVENUE: TOT TAXES 830,000.00 368,997.98 -461,002.02 830,000.00814 REVENUE: FRANCHISE FEES 285,000.00 46,019.14 -238,980.86 285,000.00815 REVENUE - LICENSES AND PERMITS 189,900.00 65,765.31 -124,134.69 189,900.00825 REVENUE - FINES & FORFEITURES 250.00 -297.79 -547.79 250.00830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 70,800.00 -107,758.40 -178,558.40 70,800.00850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 348,417.57 56,931.02 -741,103.05 798,034.07870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 50,825.00 8,174.33 -42,650.67 50,825.00880 ICA ALLOCATION 445,797.00 111,000.00 -334,797.00 445,797.00882 REVENUE - OTHER 16,500.00 92,059.99 75,559.99 16,500.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1. GENERAL FUNDS Revenue Totals 7,696,139.57 8,145,756.07 1,772,354.14 -6,373,401.93Expense 100 MAYOR, COUNCIL, CITY MANAGER, CLERK 432,382.41 432,382.41 70,103.46 362,278.95110 EXP. GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1,000,856.81 609,222.13 391,634.68 1,000,856.81130 PUBLIC SAFETY CODE ENFORCEMENT 124,003.29 23,773.42 100,229.87 124,003.29200 PUBLIC SAFETY - POLICE 3,764,055.55 755,914.55 3,008,141.00 3,764,055.55 Tuesday, December 27, 2022 Page 1 of 8
38 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
210 PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE 688,288.33 688,288.33 103,721.58 584,566.75220 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 556,999.77 135,819.65 421,180.12 556,999.77300 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING AND ADMIN 150,103.38 10,313.58 139,789.80 150,103.38350 PUBLIC WORKS - MECHANICAL MAINT (ELIM) 0.01 140,684.63 -140,684.62 0.01370 PUBLIC WORKS - SERVICE CENTER (ELIM) 0.00 6,398.00 -6,398.00 0.00400 CULTURAL & REC - PARKS AND REC 574,386.30 112,305.80 462,080.50 574,386.30645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 72,500.00 -57,562.90 130,062.90 72,500.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 35,000.00 0.00 35,000.00 35,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 90,895.00 -23,021.25 113,916.25 90,895.00760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 589,866.54 0.00 589,866.54 589,866.54

1. GENERAL FUNDS Expense Totals 8,079,337.39 8,079,337.39 1,887,672.65 6,191,664.741. GENERAL FUNDS Net Position Change -383,197.82 66,418.68 -115,318.51 -181,737.19 Tuesday, December 27, 2022 Page 2 of 8
39 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 1. GENERAL FUNDS (967 detail records)2. STREETS FUNDSRevenue 825 REVENUE - FINES & FORFEITURES 15,000.00 15,000.00 4,115.52 -10,884.48830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3,500.00 5,143.20 1,643.20 3,500.00850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 614,500.00 119,828.41 -494,671.59 614,500.00887 REVENUE: INKIND 0.00 10,933.89 10,933.89 0.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 589,866.54 0.00 -589,866.54 589,866.54

2. STREETS FUNDS Revenue Totals 1,222,866.54 1,222,866.54 140,021.02 -1,082,845.52Expense 300 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING AND ADMIN 62,542.43 62,542.43 10,280.20 52,262.23310 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET MAINTENANCE 430,564.36 229,775.93 200,788.43 430,564.36311 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET SWEEPING 85,522.92 8,720.96 76,801.96 85,522.92312 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET LIGHTING 56,144.97 6,996.63 49,148.34 56,144.97313 PUBLIC WORKS - WEED CONTROL STREETS 10,995.72 5.00 10,990.72 10,995.72314 PUBLIC WORKS - PUBLIC PARKING LOTS 2,373.41 405.85 1,967.56 2,373.41320 PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC SAFETY 68,164.14 68,164.14 9,100.18 59,063.96340 TRANSPORTATION 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 200,000.00390 PUBLIC WORKS - STORM DRAINS 171,558.63 12,881.32 158,677.31 171,558.63645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 40,000.00 0.00 40,000.00 40,000.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 90,000.00 0.00 90,000.00 90,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00

2. STREETS FUNDS Expense Totals 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 278,166.07 944,700.512. STREETS FUNDS Net Position Change -0.04 -0.04 -138,145.05 -138,145.01 Tuesday, December 27, 2022 Page 3 of 8
40 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 2. STREETS FUNDS (270 detail records)3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDSRevenue 811 OTHER TAXES 305,000.00 305,000.00 79,531.63 -225,468.37815 REVENUE - LICENSES AND PERMITS 16,000.00 0.00 -16,000.00 16,000.00830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2,500.00 6,786.81 4,286.81 2,500.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 240,000.00 60,263.97 -179,736.03 240,000.00

3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Revenue Totals 563,500.00 563,500.00 146,582.41 -416,917.59Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 65,000.01 65,000.01 1,875.63 63,124.38210 PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 15,000.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 185,708.43 124,947.24 60,761.19 185,708.43745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 80,017.81 72,734.32 7,283.49 80,017.81760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 9,500.00 0.00 9,500.00 9,500.00

3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Expense Totals 355,226.25 355,226.25 199,557.19 155,669.063. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Net Position Change 208,273.75 208,273.75 -52,974.78 -261,248.53 Tuesday, December 27, 2022 Page 4 of 8
41 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (39 detail records)4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 600.00 600.00 4,880.58 4,280.58850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2,249,000.00 162,811.22 -2,086,188.78 2,249,000.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 750,000.00 0.00 -750,000.00 750,000.00

4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Revenue Totals 2,999,600.00 2,999,600.00 167,691.80 -2,831,908.20Expense 220 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 0.00 0.00 10,742.15 -10,742.15600 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 375,750.00 47,663.88 328,086.12 375,750.00645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,674,000.00 39,991.08 2,634,008.92 2,674,000.00

4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Expense Totals 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 98,397.11 2,951,352.894. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Net Position Change -50,150.00 -50,150.00 69,294.69 119,444.69 Tuesday, December 27, 2022 Page 5 of 8
42 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS (153 detail records)5. WATER FUNDSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 83,000.00 83,000.00 -96,950.28 -179,950.28850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,734,000.00 0.00 -6,473,000.00 6,473,000.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 3,054,552.00 1,032,198.72 -2,022,353.28 3,054,552.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 7,500.00 0.00 -7,500.00 7,500.00

5. WATER FUNDS Revenue Totals 4,879,052.00 9,618,052.00 935,248.44 -8,682,803.56Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 258,545.64 258,545.64 43,245.08 215,300.56300 ENGINEERING 268,491.91 50,329.97 218,161.94 268,491.91500 WATER DISTRIBUTION EXPENSE 872,028.16 113,611.07 758,417.09 872,028.16510 WATER TREATMENT AND CONSERVATION 860,333.82 234,661.07 625,672.75 860,333.82510 COST OF POWER AND WATER 289,000.00 80,432.23 208,567.77 289,000.00645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,286,335.00 1,277,964.36 6,028,370.64 7,306,335.00690 CAPITALIZATION OF ASSETS 0.00 196,533.56 -196,533.56 0.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 221,170.83 221,170.83 0.00 221,170.83745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 128,067.34 -93,016.15 221,083.49 128,067.34760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 375,000.00 0.00 375,000.00 375,000.00799 ICA EXPENSE 229,267.00 57,000.00 172,267.00 229,267.00

5. WATER FUNDS Expense Totals 5,788,239.70 10,808,239.70 1,960,761.19 8,847,478.515. WATER FUNDS Net Position Change -909,187.70 -1,190,187.70 -1,025,512.75 164,674.95 Tuesday, December 27, 2022 Page 6 of 8
43 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 5. WATER FUNDS (294 detail records)6. SEWER FUNDSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 35,395.00 35,395.00 -53,802.81 -89,197.81850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 5,000,000.00 0.00 -5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 2,904,574.00 718,465.87 -2,186,108.13 2,904,574.00882 REVENUE - OTHER 3,300,000.00 0.00 -3,300,000.00 3,300,000.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 2,000.00 0.00 -2,000.00 2,000.00

6. SEWER FUNDS Revenue Totals 11,241,969.00 11,241,969.00 664,663.06 -10,577,305.94Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 247,545.64 247,545.64 41,946.76 205,598.88300 ENGINEERING 231,491.91 39,990.90 191,501.01 231,491.91510 COST OF POWER AND WATER 221,000.00 43,299.79 177,700.21 221,000.00550 WASTEWATER COLLECTION EXPENSE 589,801.84 47,339.30 542,462.54 589,801.84560 WASTEWATER TREATMENT EXPENSE 868,957.58 213,583.59 846,773.99 1,060,357.58645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 8,936,803.00 135,139.50 8,801,663.50 8,936,803.00690 CAPITALIZATION OF ASSETS 0.00 0.00 241,992.80 -241,992.80740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 88,000.00 0.00 88,000.00 88,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 228,855.00 -1,168.75 230,023.75 228,855.00760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 375,000.00 0.00 375,000.00 375,000.00799 ICA EXPENSE 216,530.00 54,000.00 162,530.00 216,530.00

6. SEWER FUNDS Expense Totals 12,003,984.97 12,195,384.97 816,123.89 11,379,261.086. SEWER FUNDS Net Position Change -762,015.97 -953,415.97 -151,460.83 801,955.14 Tuesday, December 27, 2022 Page 7 of 8
44 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 6. SEWER FUNDS (239 detail records) Grand Total 1,896,277.78 1,919,061.28 1,414,117.23 -504,944.05 Tuesday, December 27, 2022 Page 8 of 8
45 2022-2023 Operating Budget of Revenue and Expenditures with Year to Date Actual Results September 30, 2022
Fund AnalysisMajor Grp Fund Adopted Operating Budget Year to Date 3 Adopted Operating Budget Year to Date 4 Operating Budget Net Actual
Year to Date
Current Cash
Balance
Investment in LAIF 00 - - - - - - -
General Operating 01 7,474,244.57 7,923,861.07 1,707,710.04 7,854,692.39 7,854,692.39 1,910,193.15 (202,483.11) 69,168.68 7,755,039.32 General Operating Fund 7,474,244.57 7,923,861.07 1,707,710.04 7,854,692.39 7,854,692.39 1,910,193.15 69,168.68 (202,483.11) 7,755,039.32 Gifts Donations 02 - - 10,307.43 700.00 700.00 2,860.50 (700.00) 7,446.93 35,157.76 YVFD Volunter Fund 03 13,500.00 13,500.00 - 13,500.00 13,500.00 392.26 - (392.26) 2,238.41Trusts -Crandell-Stewart 04 - - 2,238.50 2,050.00 2,050.00 - (2,050.00) 2,238.50 441,065.95 Property Abatement 05 - - - - - 500.00 - (500.00) 58,046.49 General Fund Reserves 08 - - 52,098.17 - - - - 52,098.17 1,334,085.73 Reserves for Cap. Outlay 09 - - - - - - - - 831,125.62
Capital Outlay 10 82,500.00 82,500.00 - 82,500.00 82,500.00 (43,770.35) - 43,770.35 241,821.35 Construction Fund 11 - - - - - 696.24 - (696.24) (808.98) General Fund Debt Servicing 12 125,895.00 125,895.00 - 125,895.00 125,895.00 (23,021.25) - 23,021.25 523,073.14 Payroll Clearing 90 (764,015.98) (764,015.98) 124,651.76 - - 39,822.10 (764,015.98) 84,829.66 (701,864.69) General Fund - Restricted or Designated (542,120.98) (542,120.98) 189,295.86 224,645.00 224,645.00 (22,520.50) (766,765.98) 211,816.36 2,763,940.78 Total General Fund 6,932,123.59 7,381,740.09 1,897,005.90 8,079,337.39 8,079,337.39 1,887,672.65 (697,597.30) 9,333.25 10,518,980.10Gas Tax & Traffic Cong. 20 954,702.40 954,702.40 132,954.27 954,702.44 954,702.44 269,065.89 (0.04) (136,111.62) 250,767.82 Local Transportation 21 200,000.00 200,000.00 1,908.05 200,000.00 200,000.00 - - 1,908.05 376,770.79 Fines - Traffic Safety 24 68,164.14 68,164.14 5,158.70 68,164.14 68,164.14 9,100.18 - (3,941.48) 201,745.62 Road, Street & Transit - Restricted 1,222,866.54 1,222,866.54 140,021.02 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 278,166.07 (0.04) (138,145.05) 829,284.23 Total Road, Streets and Transit 1,222,866.54 1,222,866.54 140,021.02 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 278,166.07 (0.04) (138,145.05) 829,284.23 Fire Assessment Spec. Rev 30 307,500.00 307,500.00 84,990.04 105,726.24 105,726.24 22,681.56 201,773.76 62,308.48 1,091,705.58 Landfill Access Fee - Debt Service 31 240,000.00 240,000.00 60,263.97 240,000.01 240,000.01 176,875.63 (0.01) (116,611.66) (86,523.24) Developer Impact Fees 32 16,000.00 16,000.00 1,328.40 9,500.00 9,500.00 - 6,500.00 1,328.40 220,736.92 Special Revenue - Restricted 563,500.00 563,500.00 146,582.41 355,226.25 355,226.25 199,557.19 208,273.75 (52,974.78) 1,225,919.26 Total Special Revenue 563,500.00 563,500.00 146,582.41 355,226.25 355,226.25 199,557.19 208,273.75 (52,974.78) 1,225,919.26 Spec Grants Capital Outlay 60 - - - 2,249,000.00 2,249,000.00 99,670.52 (2,249,000.00) (99,670.52) 1,665,142.68Community Development Grants 65 2,249,000.00 2,249,000.00 162,811.22 800,750.00 800,750.00 (1,273.41) 1,448,250.00 164,084.63 924,722.14 SUMIT Operating Fund 67 750,600.00 750,600.00 4,880.58 - - - 750,600.00 4,880.58 702,929.95 Special Grants - Capital Projects 2,999,600.00 2,999,600.00 167,691.80 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 98,397.11 (50,150.00) 69,294.69 3,292,794.77 Special Grants - Operating & Capital Projects 2,999,600.00 2,999,600.00 167,691.80 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 98,397.11 (50,150.00) 69,294.69 3,292,794.77 Water Operating 70 - - - 2,585,884.53 2,585,884.53 579,279.42 (579,279.42) (2,585,884.53) 162,812.97 Water Capital Projects 71 2,585,884.55 2,585,884.55 805,926.47 2,853,117.00 7,873,117.00 1,474,497.92 (668,571.45) (5,287,232.45) (1,474,497.92) Water Debt Servicing 72 2,853,117.00 7,873,117.00 - 349,238.17 349,238.17 (93,016.15) 93,016.15 7,523,878.83 1,006,387.06 Water Reserves 74 356,738.17 356,738.17 - - - - - 356,738.17 5,236,627.35 Water Enterprise 5,795,739.72 10,815,739.72 805,926.47 5,788,239.70 10,808,239.70 1,960,761.19 7,500.02 (1,154,834.72) 4,931,329.46Sewer Operating 80 (916,687.72) (1,197,687.72) 129,321.97 2,360,449.97 2,360,449.97 440,160.34 (3,558,137.69) (310,838.37) 490,783.83 Sewer Capital Outlay 81 2,360,449.98 2,360,449.98 540,011.28 9,326,680.00 9,518,080.00 377,132.30 (7,157,630.02) 162,878.98 (113,273.87) Sewer Debt Servicing 82 9,326,680.00 9,326,680.00 263,858.43 316,855.00 316,855.00 (1,168.75) 9,009,825.00 265,027.18 708,721.00 Sewer Reserves 84 318,855.00 318,855.00 (263,858.41) - - - 318,855.00 (263,858.41) 4,891,640.05 Sewer Enterprise Fund 11,089,297.26 10,808,297.26 669,333.27 12,003,984.97 12,195,384.97 816,123.89 (1,387,087.71) (146,790.62) 5,977,871.01Total Enterprise Funds 16,885,036.98 21,624,036.98 1,475,259.74 17,792,224.67 23,003,624.67 2,776,885.08 (1,379,587.69) (1,301,625.34) 10,909,200.47 SUMIT Agency Trust - Cash 92 - - - - - - - - 19,219.49
Agency Funds - - - - - - - - 19,219.49 \
Total Agency Funds - - - - - - - - 19,219.49
All Funds Combined 33,791,743.61 28,603,127.11 3,826,560.87 30,499,404.89 35,710,804.89 5,240,678.10 (1,919,061.28) (1,414,117.23) 26,795,398.32 Excess of Rev over Exp.-Surplus/
R E V E N U E E X P E N S E (Deficit)
Approval:______________________________________________________Corey Middleton, Mayor 12/27/2022 9:48 AM 46 City of Yreka Financial Statement Groupings
Summary FY 22-23 YTD Fiscal Performance
as of September 30, 2022
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt

1. GENERAL FUNDS Revenue Totals 7,696,139.57 8,145,756.07 1,772,354.14 -6,373,401.93Expense 100 MAYOR, COUNCIL, CITY MANAGER, CLERK 432,382.41 432,382.41 70,103.46 362,278.95110 EXP. GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1,000,856.81 609,222.13 391,634.68 1,000,856.81130 PUBLIC SAFETY CODE ENFORCEMENT 124,003.29 23,773.42 100,229.87 124,003.29200 PUBLIC SAFETY - POLICE 3,764,055.55 755,914.55 3,008,141.00 3,764,055.55 Tuesday, December 27, 2022 Page 1 of 8
47 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
210 PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE 688,288.33 688,288.33 103,721.58 584,566.75220 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 556,999.77 135,819.65 421,180.12 556,999.77300 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING AND ADMIN 150,103.38 10,313.58 139,789.80 150,103.38350 PUBLIC WORKS - MECHANICAL MAINT (ELIM) 0.01 140,684.63 -140,684.62 0.01370 PUBLIC WORKS - SERVICE CENTER (ELIM) 0.00 6,398.00 -6,398.00 0.00400 CULTURAL & REC - PARKS AND REC 574,386.30 112,305.80 462,080.50 574,386.30645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 72,500.00 -57,562.90 130,062.90 72,500.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 35,000.00 0.00 35,000.00 35,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 90,895.00 -23,021.25 113,916.25 90,895.00760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 589,866.54 0.00 589,866.54 589,866.54

1. GENERAL FUNDS Expense Totals 8,079,337.39 8,079,337.39 1,887,672.65 6,191,664.741. GENERAL FUNDS Net Position Change -383,197.82 66,418.68 -115,318.51 -181,737.19 Tuesday, December 27, 2022 Page 2 of 8
48 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 1. GENERAL FUNDS (967 detail records)2. STREETS FUNDSRevenue 825 REVENUE - FINES & FORFEITURES 15,000.00 15,000.00 4,115.52 -10,884.48830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3,500.00 5,143.20 1,643.20 3,500.00850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 614,500.00 119,828.41 -494,671.59 614,500.00887 REVENUE: INKIND 0.00 10,933.89 10,933.89 0.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 589,866.54 0.00 -589,866.54 589,866.54

2. STREETS FUNDS Expense Totals 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 278,166.07 944,700.512. STREETS FUNDS Net Position Change -0.04 -0.04 -138,145.05 -138,145.01 Tuesday, December 27, 2022 Page 3 of 8
49 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 2. STREETS FUNDS (270 detail records)3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDSRevenue 811 OTHER TAXES 305,000.00 305,000.00 79,531.63 -225,468.37815 REVENUE - LICENSES AND PERMITS 16,000.00 0.00 -16,000.00 16,000.00830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2,500.00 6,786.81 4,286.81 2,500.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 240,000.00 60,263.97 -179,736.03 240,000.00

3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Expense Totals 355,226.25 355,226.25 199,557.19 155,669.063. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Net Position Change 208,273.75 208,273.75 -52,974.78 -261,248.53 Tuesday, December 27, 2022 Page 4 of 8
50 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (39 detail records)4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 600.00 600.00 4,880.58 4,280.58850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2,249,000.00 162,811.22 -2,086,188.78 2,249,000.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 750,000.00 0.00 -750,000.00 750,000.00

4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Expense Totals 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 98,397.11 2,951,352.894. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Net Position Change -50,150.00 -50,150.00 69,294.69 119,444.69 Tuesday, December 27, 2022 Page 5 of 8
51 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS (153 detail records)5. WATER FUNDSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 83,000.00 83,000.00 -96,950.28 -179,950.28850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,734,000.00 0.00 -6,473,000.00 6,473,000.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 3,054,552.00 1,032,198.72 -2,022,353.28 3,054,552.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 7,500.00 0.00 -7,500.00 7,500.00

5. WATER FUNDS Expense Totals 5,788,239.70 10,808,239.70 1,960,761.19 8,847,478.515. WATER FUNDS Net Position Change -909,187.70 -1,190,187.70 -1,025,512.75 164,674.95 Tuesday, December 27, 2022 Page 6 of 8
52 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 5. WATER FUNDS (294 detail records)6. SEWER FUNDSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 35,395.00 35,395.00 -53,802.81 -89,197.81850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 5,000,000.00 0.00 -5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 2,904,574.00 718,465.87 -2,186,108.13 2,904,574.00882 REVENUE - OTHER 3,300,000.00 0.00 -3,300,000.00 3,300,000.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 2,000.00 0.00 -2,000.00 2,000.00

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
To: Yreka City Council
Prepared by: Emily Aldrich, Finance Director
Agenda title: Adopt A Resolution Setting Forth the Appropriations Limit for the City of Yreka for Fiscal Year 2022-2023
Meeting date: January 3, 2023
Discussion:

On June 7, 2022, the City of Yreka passed resolution 2022-19 Setting Forth the Appropriation Limit for the City of Yreka for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023.

During the annual audit it was discovered that when setting the appropriation limit for 2021-2022 a factor of -0.50% was used instead of a factor of -0.05%, therefore changing the 2021-2022 limit from $19,734,093 to $19,823,343.

Therefor the City needs to supersede resolution 2022-19 with the correct amount for 2021- 2022, that now changes the amount for 2022-2023
Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (Article 4) and related implementing legislation provide for an annual "appropriations limit" for each entity of local government and require the governing body of each local jurisdiction to establish its appropriation limit by resolution each year.

The appropriation limit does not apply to the entire City budget but only to the appropriation of "proceeds of taxes" in the City's "general government" type funds.

From 1980-81 to 1989-90, each year's appropriation limit was based on the previous year's limit, multiplied by the percentage change in population and the percentage change in the United States Consumer Price Index or the change in California per capita income, whichever was less. Proposition 111, which was approved by the voters in June 1990, amended the factors used in the calculation of each year's limit. The factors to be used now are:

Population Factor - At the City's option, either the annual change in City or County population.

Price Factor - At the City's option, either the change in California per capita income or increase in non-residential assessed valuation due to new construction.

The formula to be used in calculating the growth rate is:
% change in population + 100.00
100
55 2
times either
% change in per capita income + 100.00
100.00
or
Change in non-residential assessments + 100.00
100.00
The resultant rate times the previous appropriation limit equals the new appropriation limit.

Both the California per capita personal income price factor and the population percentage change factors are provided by the State Department of Finance (DOF) to local jurisdictions each year. Population percentage change factors estimate changes in the City’s population between January of the previous fiscal year and January of the current fiscal year. These numbers provide the factor to be used in the City’s calculation of the Gann limit.

In May 2022, the State Department of Finance notified each city of the population changes and the per capita personal income factor to be used in determining appropriation limits.

The Finance Director, using the change in per capita income method, has made the following calculation as applied to the City of Yreka for 2022-23 is: The population on January 1 of the previous year compared to January 1, 2022 (DOF Estimates 7,772) is a

0.06% decrease. The increase in the California per Capita Income for 2021-22 is 7.55% The factor for determining the year-to-year increase computed as:
-0.06 + 100.00 x 7.55 + 100.00 = 1.0748547
100.00 100.00
Applying this year’s factor of 1.0748547 to last year’s limit of $19,823,343, the Gann limit for Fiscal Year 2022-23 is $21,307,213. With appropriations subject to the limit totaling $8,079,337, the City of Yreka is not at risk of exceeding the Gann limit.

Fiscal Impact:

The Gann Limit sets to restrict budgeting expenditures by subjecting an appropriations limit to no more than $21,307,213. The City is budgeting $8,079,337 of expenditures that are subject to the appropriations limit. The City is not at risk of exceeding the limit.

Recommendation and Requested Action:

Adopt A Resolution superseding Resolution 2022-19 Setting Forth the Appropriations Limit for the City of Yreka for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023. 56 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-01

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA

SETTING FORTH THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE
CITY OF YREKA FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
WHEREAS, this resolution will supersede Resolution No. 2022-19, due to a calculation error; and
WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California as implemented by SB 1352 of 1980 and amended by Proposition 111 of 1990 specifies that the total annual appropriations limit of the City shall be adjusted for the change in population and the change in cost of living; and WHEREAS, the California State Department of Finance has provided the population estimate for the City of Yreka as of January 1, 2022; to be 7,772 and WHEREAS, the California State Department of Finance has provided the annual percentage change population estimate for the City of Yreka, a decrease of

0.06%, and the change in the California per capita personal income, an increase of

7.55%.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Yreka that it does determine that the appropriations limit for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022 is $21,307,213. Appropriations subject to the Gann Limit are $8,079,337.

Passed and adopted this 3rd day of January 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT: _________________________
ASTAIN: Corey Middleton, Mayor
Approved as to content: ATTEST:
_________________________ _________________________
Emily Aldrich, Finance Director Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk 57 58

Page 1 of 3 ends

CITY OF YREKA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
To: Yreka City Council
From: John Elsnab, Human Resources Director
Agenda title: Adopt a Resolution 2023-01 Recognizing the City of Yreka’s 2023 Contribution to Employees Healthcare Costs through the IRS Section 125 Cafeteria Plan Meeting date: January 3, 2023
Summary:

The City currently contributes to employees cost of healthcare coverage through the City’s current cafeteria plan. The City provides a tiered Plan model contribution to all benefit eligible employees to participate in the City sponsored medical health benefits under the medical health insurance benefit program.

Under the CalPERS Health Benefit Program equal contribution option, the City is required under PEMHCA to provide the same benefit to active employees and retired employees (Public Employee Retirement Law Section 22892(b)(1)). The amount designated is the minimum amount required by CalPERS. The City of Yreka annually adopts the new minimum by Resolution for the coming year.

In 2023, the minimum will be $151 as this amount is increased annually on January 1 by a cost-of-living adjustment. This benefit is included in our collection bargaining unit agreements.

The City provides the minimum employer contribution (MEC) for retirees and a larger tiered-benefit for active employees. The City’s design is common and deemed PEMHCA compliant by using a flexible benefits cafeteria plan, for active employee contributions in excess of the retiree contribution. It is through the cafeteria plan, that City designates this minimum amount as the medical contribution towards active employees and then contributes the additional benefit through the plan structure for employee to use to pay (deduct from their payroll) for medical benefit premiums in excess of the minimum equal contribution.

This resolution defines the employer’s contribution amount to the cafeteria plan in excess of the equal MEC.

Fiscal Impact: Fiscal impacts for the annual minimum employer contribution were considered in approval of bargaining unit settlements and the City’s bi-annual budget.

Recommendation and Requested Action:

Adopt Resolution 2023-01 Recognizing the City of Yreka’s 2023 Contribution to Employees Healthcare Costs through the IRS Section 125 Cafeteria Plan.
59

Page 2 of 3 ends

Supplemental Information –
Cafeteria Plan and CalPERS PEMHCA
Cafeteria Plan
A cafeteria plan, hereafter the Plan, pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 125, is an employee benefits program that enables participants the opportunity to purchase certain qualified benefits (e.g., medical health insurance) on a pre-tax basis, thereby reducing their total taxable income and increasing their spendable/take home income.

Cafeteria Plan allowance
The City agrees to provide tiered Plan model contribution to all benefit eligible employees to participate in the City sponsored medical health benefits under the medical health insurance benefit program and offer employees FSA. Any tax consequences (most likely regarding employees who opt out) resulting from City contributions to the Cafeteria Plan are the sole responsibility of the employee. Any increases to the minimum monthly contribution under PEMHCA will result in a corresponding decrease in the employee's Plan allowance, unless otherwise agreed to on the employee/employer Memorandum of Understanding.

Under the CalPERS Health Benefit Program equal contribution option, the City is required under PEMHCA to provide the same benefit to active employees and retired employees (Public Employee Retirement Law Section 22892(b)(1)). The amount designated is the minimum amount required by CalPERS. In 2022, the minimum is $149. This amount increases annually on January 1 by a costof-living adjustment and will be $151 for calendar year 2023.

The City provides the Minimum Employer Contribution (MEC) for retirees, and a larger tieredbenefit for active employees. The City’s design is fairly common and deemed PEMHCA compliant by using a flexible benefits cafeteria plan, for active contributions in excess of the retiree contribution. It is through the cafeteria plan, that City designates this minimum amount as the medical contribution towards active employees and then contributes the additional benefit through the plan structure for employee to use to pay (deduct from their payroll) for medical benefit premiums in excess of the minimum equal contribution.

Active benefit eligible employees:

The City will contribute an amount to the Plan, on behalf of active employees currently covered by a CalPERS medical policy. The monthly contribution to the flexible benefit plan shall equal to 100% of the premium for the employee and his or her eligible dependents not to exceed the amounts in the following table.
60

Page 3 of 3 ends

City’s Plan Contribution 2022 Active Employee
Cafeteria Benefit
(that includes the
MEC)
CalPERS
Medical
Benefit
Total Benefit
Employee $ 550 $151 $ 701
Employee + 1 eligible covered
individual
$1,253 $151 $1,404
Employee + 2 or more eligible
covered individuals
$1,674 $151 $1,825

A portion of this amount (the minimum amount each year described above) is specifically designated toward the cost of medical insurance coverage. The City’s excess of the MEC contribution to the Plan can only be used for the purchase of City provided medical coverage though CalPERS, except for the employee opt out provision (see below).

No changes to retired employees:

The retiree’s monthly contribution toward their medical coverage shall be the cost of their monthly health benefit premium less the total amount of the City’s contribution on their behalf as described above. For a retired employee to be eligible to receive health benefits through the City upon retirement, a retiree must meet the following definition of “annuitant” under CalPERS’ requirements:
a) The employee must be a member of CalPERS; and
b) The employee must retire within 120 days of separation from employment with the City and begin receiving a monthly retirement allowance from CalPERS.

Summary:

The City will continue to contract with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) for the purpose of providing employees with medical insurance benefits. The City's maximum monthly contribution for each eligible active employee for the purpose of medical insurance will be equal to the minimum MEC required under the Public Employees Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA).
61 BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA

AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: January 3, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dohn Henion, Yreka City Attorney
TITLE: RESOLUTION TO CONTINUE HOLDING PUBLIC MEETINGS REMOTELY (AB 361) RECOMMENDATION:

In accordance with Assembly Bill 361, adopt a resolution to continue conducting the City’s Council, Commission, and Committee meetings remotely due to health and safety concerns to the public due to COVID-19.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

BACKGROUND:

On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a State of Emergency to make additional resources available, formalize emergency actions already underway across multiple state agencies and departments, and help the state prepare for a broader spread of COVID-19.

Thereafter, on March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-2920, which suspended certain provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act to allow local legislative bodies to conduct meetings telephonically or by other means. Additionally, the State implemented a shelter-in-place order, requiring all non-essential personnel to work from home.

Staff quickly worked to set up remote meetings via Zoom for all City Council and Planning Commission meetings. The Zoom meetings have allowed the Council, Commissions, and Committees to continue to conduct City business from the safety of members’ homes. The City has been utilizing Zoom for the past 18 months to conduct nearly all public meetings. The usage of Zoom for public meetings has allowed the City to ensure the public’s continued access to government meetings while also ensuring the public’s safety.

On June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21, which extended the ability of agencies to hold remote meetings through September 30, 2021, after which agencies anticipated transitioning back to public meetings held in full compliance with the Brown Act. In preparation for the return to in-person meetings, staff has been working on acquiring audio and visual upgrades for City facilities to conduct hybrid meetings. Although hybrid meetings would help to keep the public safe by allowing them to continue accessing the meetings from their own home, Councilmembers, Commissioners, Committee members, and staff would need to meet in person.
62 Since the Governor issued Executive Order N-08-21, the Delta variant has emerged, causing a spike in cases throughout the state.

On September 16, 2021, Governor Newson signed Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361), which allows cities to continue to meet remotely during proclaimed states of emergency under modified Brown Act requirements that are similar but not identical to the rules and procedures established by the previous Executive Orders.

AB 361 authorizes local agencies to use teleconferencing without complying with the teleconferencing requirements imposed by the Ralph M. Brown Act during a declared state of emergency, when state or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing during the proclaimed state of emergency, or when there is an imminent risk to the health or safety of attendees.

DISCUSSION:

AB 361 will allow local legislative bodies to continue to meet remotely after the September 30, 2021 expiration of the Governor’s executive orders. A local agency will be allowed to continue to meet remotely when:
• The local agency holds a meeting during a declared state of emergency • State or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing
• Legislative bodies declare the need to meet remotely due to present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees
The City meets the requirements to continue holding meetings remotely to ensure the health and safety of the public due to the following:
• The City is still under a local state of emergency;
• County health orders require that all individuals in public spaces maintain social distancing and wear masks;
• The City can’t maintain social distancing requirements for the public, staff, Councilmembers, Commissioners, and Committee Members in their meeting spaces; The City cannot ensure social distancing requirements are met inside City facilities where the City Council, Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Redistricting Advisory Committee, Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, and Main Street Bridge Advisory Committee meet.

Moreover, the indoor mask order is still in effect, making it difficult to hear what Councilmembers, Commissioners, Committee Members, staff, and public speakers are saying.

Furthermore, while speaking through masks may be understandable in person, picking up speech on microphones for those attending remotely and those watching any livestreams would be difficult.
63 Per AB 361, the City Council would need to declare every 30 days that the City’s legislative bodies must continue to meet remotely to ensure the health and safety of the public. Staff recommends that the City Council declare these findings are true so these bodies can continue to meet remotely. Staff will return with this resolution for re-ratification at the Council’s 1st Tuesday meeting each month, at which time the Council can reassess as various health orders and COVID-19 parameters change.
64 RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 51
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 A RESOLUTION OF THE YREKA CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

YREKA PROCLAIMING A LOCAL EMERGENCY, RATIFYING THE

PROCLAMATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY BY GOVERNOR
NEWSOM ON MARCH 4, 2020, AND AUTHORIZING REMOTE

TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF
CITY OF YREKA FOR THE PERIOD SUCCESSIVE 30-DAY PERIODS
PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361
9 WHEREAS, the City of Yreka is committed to preserving and nurturing IO public access and participation in meetings of the Yreka City Council; and 11 WHEREAS, all meetings of City of Yreka's legislative bodies are open and 12 public, as required by t.he Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code§ 54950 13 54963), so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the 14 City's legislative bodies conduct their business; and 15 16 WHEREAS, the Brown Act, Government Code section 54953(e), makes 17 provisions for remote teleconferencing paiiicipation in meetings by members of 18 a legislative body, without compliance with the requirements of Government 19 Code section 54953(b )(3), subject to the existence of certain conditions; and 20 WHEREAS, a required condition is that a state of emergency is declared by the 21 Governor pursuant to Government Code section 8625, proclaiming the existence 22 of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property 23 within the state caused by conditions as described in Government Code section 24 8558;and
25 WHEREAS, a proclamation is made when there is an actual incident, threat of 26 disaster, or extreme peril to the safety of persons and prope1iy within the 27 jurisdictions that are within the City's boundaries, caused by natural, 28 technological, or human-caused disasters; and
29 WHEREAS, it is further required that state or local officials have imposed or 30 recommended measures to promote social distancing, or, the legislative body 65 31 meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of 32 attendees; and
33 WHEREAS, such conditions now exist in the City, specifically, in Executive Order 34 N-29-20 the Governor of the State of California declared a state of emergency to 35 exist as a result of the threat of COVID-19; and
36 WHEREAS, said order suspended provisions of celiain provisions of the Brown 37 Act relating to teleconference meetings and creating the ability for viliual meetings 38 to keep the public and our public officials safer from exposure to the pandemic; and 39 WHEREAS, that suspension of the Brown Act requires expired on September 30, 40 2021; and
41 WHEREAS, On September 16,2021 Assembly Bill 361 was passed into law 42 permitting the extension of virtual meetings so long as the state of emergency 43 exists and is reviewed every thirty days by the Yreka City Council; and 44 WHEREAS, the delta variant of COVID-19 has resulted in Siskiyou County 45 having experienced 4,382 confirmed COVID-19 amongst the local population 46 cases, 54 deaths, 56 new cases reported in the last 24 hours with 271 active cases 47 and 23 persons presently hospitalized and, accordingly, social distancing and 48 masking is required for attendees' health and safety to mitigate the imminent risk 49 of COVID-19 being transmissible during public, in-person meetings of the City of 50 Yreka; and
51 WHEREAS, virtual meetings further mitigate the public's health and safety while 52 still providing the opportunity for public input on the people's business; and 53 WHEREAS, the City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of 54 emergency; and
55 WHEREAS, the state of local emergency continues to directly impact the ability of 56 the City Council, Commissions, and Committees, as well as staff and members of 57 the public, from meeting safely in person; and
58 WHEREAS, the Yreka City Council does hereby find that prevalence of COVID-19 59 amongst the local population and, accordingly, social distancing and masking is 2 66
60 required for attendees health and safety to mitigate the imminent risk of COVID-19 61 being transmissible during public, in-person meetings of the City of Yreka, its 62 commissions and committees may cause, and may continue to cause, conditions of 63 peril to the safety of persons within the City that are likely to be beyond the control of 64 services, persOlmel, equipment, and facilities of the City, healthcare providers and 65 local hospitals, and desires to proclaim a local emergency and ratify the 66 proclamation of state of emergency by the Governor of the State of California; and 67 68 WHEREAS, as a consequence of the local emergency, the Yreka City Council 69 does hereby find that the City of Yreka's governing body, its commissions and 70 committees shall conduct their meetings without compliance with paragraph (3) of 71 subdivision (b) of Government Code section 54953, as authorized by subdivision 72 (e) of section 54953, and that such legislative bodies shall comply with the 73 requirements to provide the public with access to the meetings as prescribed in 74 paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of section 54953; and 75 WHEREAS, meetings are posted on the City's website providing the necessary 76 information for the public to virtually provide input to the governing body on the 77 people's business.
78 NOW, THEREFORE, THE YREKA CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 79 YREKA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
80 Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are 81 incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. 82 Section 2. Proclamation of Local Emergency. The City Council hereby proclaims 83 that a local emergency now exists throughout the City, and prevalence of COVID84 19 amongst the local population and, accordingly, social distancing and masking is 85 required for attendees health and safety to mitigate the imminent risk of COVID-19 86 being transmissible during public, in-person meetings of the City of Yreka has 87 caused, and will continue to cause, conditions of peril to the safety of persons within 88 the City that are likely to be beyond the control of services, personnel, equipment, and 89 facilities of the City, healthcare providers and local hospitals. 3 67
90 Section 3. Ratification of Governor's Proclamation ofa State of Emergency. The 91 City Council hereby ratifies the Governor of the State of California's Proclamation 92 of State of Emergency, effective as of its issuance date of March 4, 2021. 93 Section 4. Remote Teleconference Meetings. The staff and legislative bodies of 94 City of Yreka are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to 95 cany out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, conducting open and 96 public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and other 97 applicable provisions of the Brown Act.
98 Section 5. Effective Date of Resolution. This Resolution shall take effect 99 immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective until the earlier of (i) 30 days 100 from adoption of resolution, and 30 days from each successive affirmation that the 101 state of emergency continues to exist or such time the Yreka City Council adopts a 102 subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953( e)(3) to 103 extend the time during which the governing body of the City of Yreka may continue 104 to teleconference without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of 105 section 54953.
106 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Yreka City Council of the City of Yreka, this 5th 107 day of October, 2021, by the following vote:
108 AYES: FREEMAN, MIDDLETON, BAIRD, KEGG
109 NOES:
110 ABSENT: MCCOY
111 ABSTAIN:
112
113 DuaneK
114 Attest:
115
116
4 68

CITY OF YREKA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
To:

Prepared By:

Agenda Title:

Meeting date:

Yreka City Council
City Clerk
Discussion/Possible Action: Continuation of Urgency Ordinance 864.

January 3, 2023
Discussion:

The drought, prevailing climatic temperatures, and the allocation of Yreka Fire Resources to mutual aid to suppress wildfires was found to constitute an immediate threat to the public safety.

Ordinance 864 delays the sale of fireworks and the use of fireworks and public displays of pyrotechnics until the threat to public safety is abated.

Recommendation:

That the Council continue Urgency Ordinance 864.
69 SUMMARY OF ADOPTED URGENCY ORDINANCE No. 864
Please take notice that the Yreka City Council adopted, at an emergency meeting held on July 29, 2021, a temporary urgency ordinance, number 864, entitled: “AN UNCODIFIED URGENCY

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF YREKA DECLARING A LOCAL EMERGENCY, AND AUTHORIZING THE

DELAY OF THE SALE AND USE OF FIREWORKS WHICH MAY CREATE A THREAT TO PUBLIC SAFETY

DEEMED TO BE ARISING FROM THE INCIDENCE OF THE LAVA FIRE AND SETTING FORTH THE FACTS CONSTITUTING SUCH URGENCY AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE EXEMPT FROM CEQA REVIEW” This urgency ordinance generally provides:

1. The factual background of the Lava Fire, the drought, the prevailing climatic temperatures and the fact that Yreka’s Fire Resources are engaged in mutual aid to suppress the Lava Fire as well as the allocation of law enforcement resources in traffic control and the fact that without Yreka’s normally available police and fire resources, the use of fireworks and pyrotechnics fire may not be able to be suppressed which was found to constitute the basis for the urgency nature of the ordinance and the City Council determined that there existed an immediate threat to the public health, safety and/or welfare and a need for immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety that warrants the adopted urgency measures.

2. The ordinance delays the sale of fireworks and the use of fireworks and public displays of pyrotechnics until the threat to public safety is abated and the urgency ordinance is terminated.

3. The city council determined that a local emergency now exists and shall continue to exist until its termination is ordained by the City Council. The need for continuance of the urgency measures will be regularly reviewed by City Council until it is terminated. The ordinance will be terminated at the earliest possible time.

4. The ordinance vests in the City Manager, Chief of Police and the Fire Chief with the discretion to take such acts as may be necessary to effectuate the intent of the ordinance.

5. The Council determined that the ordinance complies with a categorical exemption from CEQA review.

By roll call vote the following councilmembers voted in favor of the ordinance: Duane Kegg, Deborah Baird, Paul McCoy and Corey Middleton.

This summary is not intended to be a comprehensive statement of all of the provisions of the Ordinance, but constitutes only a fair summary of the Ordinance. The complete text of the Ordinance and the minutes of the emergency session is available for review online in Yreka’s City Council Agenda section or through a public records request as an in-person review of it is not available because City Hall is not currently open to the public.

Yreka City Clerk
70 CITY OF YREKA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Prepared by:

Agenda Title:

Meeting date:

Juliana Lucchesi, AICP, Planning Director

11.a. HO-2022-01 Prohousing Designation Application
January 3, 2023, continued from December 20, 2022
Recommended Action:

Motion to approve Resolution CCR-2022-59 A Resolution of the City of Yreka City Council Authorizing Application to and Participation in the Prohousing Designation Program.

Summary:

City Staff has developed an application to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for a “Prohousing Designation”. The Prohousing Housing Designation identifies local policies that jurisdictions is adopting to address housing needs and affordability, and identifies State programs and grants for which Prohousing designated jurisdictions should receive preference or additional points. City Staff are requesting City Council review of the proposed activities to achieve a Pro Housing Designation and authorize the submittal of the application to HCD.

Background:

In an effort to address the housing crisis in the State of California, as part of the 2019-2022 Budget Act, the legislature enacted AB 101 and established the Prohousing Designation Program. The Prohousing Designation Program identifies local policies that jurisdictions should consider adopting to address housing needs and affordability, and identifies State programs and grants for which Prohousing designated jurisdictions should receive preference or additional points.

Per Section 65589.9(f)(2) of the California Government Code:
“Prohousing local policies” means policies that facilitate the planning, approval, or construction of housing. These policies may include, but are not limited to, the following:
(A) Local financial incentives for housing, including, but not limited to, establishing a local housing trust fund.
71 (B) Reduced parking requirements for sites that are zoned for residential development.
(C) Adoption of zoning allowing for use by right for residential and mixed-use development.
(D) Zoning more sites for residential development or zoning sites at higher densities than is required to accommodate the minimum existing regional housing need allocation for the current housing element cycle.
(E) Adoption of accessory dwelling unit ordinances or other mechanisms that reduce barriers for property owners to create accessory dwelling units beyond the requirements outlined in Section 65852.2, as determined by the department.
(F) Reduction of permit processing time.
(G) Creation of objective development standards. (H) Reduction of development impact fees.
(I) Establishment of a Workforce Housing Opportunity Zone, as defined in Section 65620, or a housing sustainability district, as defined in Section 66200.

Per Section 65589.9. of the California Government Code:
(a) It is the intent of the Legislature to create incentives for jurisdictions that are compliant with housing element requirements and have enacted prohousing local policies. It is the intent of the Legislature that these incentives be in the form of additional points or other preference in the scoring of competitive housing and infrastructure programs. It is the intent of the Legislature that, in adopting regulations related to prohousing local policy criteria, the department shall create criteria that consider the needs of rural, suburban, and urban jurisdictions and how those criteria may differ in those areas.
(b) For award cycles commenced after July 1, 2021, jurisdictions that have adopted a housing element that has been found by the department to be in substantial compliance with the requirements of this article pursuant to Section 65585, and that have been designated prohousing pursuant to subdivision
72 (c) based upon their adoption of prohousing local policies, shall be awarded additional points or preference in the scoring of program applications for the following programs:
(1) The Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program established by Part 1 (commencing with Section 75200) of Division 44 of the Public Resources Code.
(2) The Transformative Climate Communities Program established by Part 4 (commencing with Section 75240) of Division 44 of the Public Resources Code.
(3) The Infill Incentive Grant Program of 2007 established by Section 53545.13 of the Health and Safety Code.
(4) Additional bonus points may be awarded to other state programs when already allowable under state law.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact to apply for a Pro Housing Designation.

Council Discussion:

There are four scoring categories to evaluate jurisdictions under the Prohousing Designation:

1. Favorable Zoning and Land Use

2. Acceleration of Housing Production Timelines

3. Reduction of Construction and Development Cost

4. Providing Financial Subsidies
An additional category titled “Enhancement Factors” allows a jurisdiction to receive extra points for each qualifying Prohousing policy. For example, Enhancement Factor Category 4 is for “Policies that go beyond state law requirements in reducing displacement of lower income households and conserving existing housing stock that is affordable to lower income households.” Each City policy that works to achieve the goals of Enhancement Factor Category 4 may receive an additional point. However, a policy may not be double counted: if a policy has received points under one category, it cannot receive points in another category.

In order to receive a Prohousing designation, a jurisdiction must receive a minimum of 30 points. Existing and proposed policies may receive points. Staff has done a preliminary assessment of existing policies and those proposed in the Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element. The attached Preliminary Prohousing Score Sheet 73 details each of the categories eligible for points. Staff has calculated that the City of Yreka is likely to receive 45 points under the four Prohousing categories.

Attachment 2 identifies the categories, points possible, and points eligible based on programs in the draft Housing Element.

Staff Recommendation:

City Staff recommend the City Council discuss the draft scoring sheet for agreement with the proposed programs and approve the attached resolution to submit the application to HCD for review and approval.

City Council may add or remove programs in the application. If the Council adds programs then Staff will add programs to the Housing Element draft to support the initiative. The Council may remove programs as long as the total score does not fall below 30 points or a category is without any points; excluding the enhancement factors.

Attachments:

1. CCR-2022-59 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka Authorizing Application to and Participation in the Prohousing Designation Program.

2. Prohousing Designation Scoring Sheet
74 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-59

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA

AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO AND PARTICIPATION IN THE PROHOUSING

DESIGNATION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Government Code section 65589.9 established the Prohousing Designation Program (“PDP” or “Program”), which creates incentives for jurisdictions that are compliant with state housing element requirements and that have enacted Prohousing local policies; and WHEREAS, such jurisdictions will be designated Prohousing, and, as such, will receive additional points or other preference during the scoring of their competitive applications for specified housing and infrastructure funding; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) has adopted emergency regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) to implement the Program (“Program Regulations”), as authorized by Government Code section 65589.9, subdivision (d); and
WHEREAS, the City of Yreka (“Applicant”) desires to submit an application for a Prohousing Designation (“Application”).

THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT:

1. Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Department.

2. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it is currently in compliance with applicable state housing law.

3. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it will continue to comply with applicable housing laws and to refrain from enacting laws, developing policies, or taking other local governmental actions that may or do inhibit or constrain housing production. Examples of such local laws, policies, and action include moratoriums on development; local voter approval requirements related to housing production; downzoning; and unduly restrictive or onerous zoning regulations, development standards, or permit procedures. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that it commits itself to affirmatively furthering fair housing pursuant to Government Code section 8899.50.

4. If the Application is approved, Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to participate in the Program, and all amendments thereto (the “Program Documents”).

5. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the Application; the terms and conditions specified in the Program Documents; the Program Regulations; and any and all other applicable law.
75 6. The City Manager is authorized to execute and deliver the Application and the Program Documents on behalf of the Applicant for participation in the Program.

Passed and adopted this 3rd day of January 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________
Cory Middleton, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk
76 Project Proposal
Category 1: Favorable Zoning and Land Use
Category Prohousing Policy Description Points Eligible
Points
1A Sufficient sites, including rezoning, to accommodate 150 percent or greater of the current or draft RHNA, whichever is greater, by total or income category.
3 3
1B Permitting missing middle housing uses (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) by right in existing low-density, single-family residential zones.
3 3
1C Sufficient sites, including rezoning, to accommodate 125 to 149 percent of the current or draft RHNA, whichever is greater, by total or income category. These points shall not be awarded if the applicant earns three points pursuant to Category (1)(A) above.
2 -
1D Density bonus programs which exceed statutory requirements by 10 percent or more.
2 2
1E Increasing allowable density in low-density, single-family residential areas beyond the requirements of state Accessory Dwelling Unit law (e.g., permitting more than one ADU or JADU per single-family lot).

These policies shall be separate from any qualifying policies under Category (1)(B) above.
2 -
1F Reducing or eliminating parking requirements for residential development as authorized by Government Code sections 65852.2; adopting vehicular parking ratios that are less than the relevant ratio thresholds at subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of Government Code section 65915, subdivision (p)(1); or adopting maximum parking requirements at or less than ratios pursuant to Government Code section 65915, subdivision (p).
2 2
1G Zoning to allow for residential or mixed uses in one or more nonresidential zones (e.g., commercial, light industrial). Qualifying nonresidential zones do not include open space or substantially similar zones.
1 1
1H Modification of development standards and other applicable zoning provisions to promote greater development intensity. Potential areas of focus include floor area ratio; height limits; minimum lot or unit sizes; setbacks; and allowable dwelling units per acre. These policies must be separate from any qualifying policies under Category (1)(B) above.
1 -
77 1I Establishment of a Workforce Housing Opportunity Zone, as defined in Government Code section 65620, or a housing sustainability district, as defined in Government Code section 66200.
1 -
1J Demonstrating other zoning and land use actions that measurably support the Acceleration of Housing Production.
1 -
TOTALS 18 11
78 Project Proposal
Category 2: Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes Category Prohousing Policy Description Points Eligible
Points
2A Establishment of ministerial approval processes for a variety of housing types, including single-family and multifamily housing. 3 3
2B Establishment of streamlined, program-level CEQA analysis and certification of general plans, community plans, specific plans with accompanying Environmental Impact Reports (EIR), and related documents.
2 2
2C Documented practice of streamlining housing development at the project level, such as by enabling a by-right approval process or by utilizing statutory and categorical exemptions as authorized by applicable law (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21155.1, 21155.4, 21159.24, 21159.25; Gov. Code, § 65457; Cal Code Regs., tit. 14, §§ 15303, 15332; Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21094.5, 21099, 21155.2, 21159.28).
2 2
2D Establishment of permit processes that take less than four months.

Policies under this Category (2)(D) must address all approvals necessary to issue building permits.
2 -
2E Absence or elimination of public hearings for projects consistent with zoning and the general plan.
2 2
2F Establishment of consolidated or streamlined permit processes that minimize the levels of review and approval required for projects, and that are consistent with zoning regulations and the general plan.
1 1
2G Absence, elimination or replacement of subjective development and design standards with objective development and design standards that simplify zoning clearance and improve approval certainty and timing.
1 1
2H Establishment of one-stop-shop permitting processes or a single point of contact where entitlements are coordinated across city approval functions (e.g., planning, public works, building) from entitlement application to certificate of occupancy.
1 1
2I Priority permit processing or reduced plan check times for ADUs/JADUs, multifamily housing, or homes affordable to lower- or moderate-income households.
1 1
79 2J Establishment of a standardized application form for all entitlement applications.
1 1
2K Practice of publicly posting status updates on project permit approvals on the Internet.
1 1
2L Limitation on the total number of hearings for any project to three or fewer. Applicants that accrue points pursuant to Category (2)(E) are not eligible for points under this Category (2)(L).
1 1
2M Demonstration of other actions, not listed above, that quantifiably decrease production timeframes or promote the streamlining of approval processes.
1 -
TOTAL 19 16
80 Project Proposal
Category 3: Reduction of Construction and Development Costs Category Prohousing Policy Description Points Eligible
Points
3A Waiver or significant reduction of development impact fees for residential development.
3 3
3B Adoption of ordinances or implementation of other mechanisms that result in less restrictive requirements than Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 to reduce barriers for property owners to create ADUs/JADUs. Examples of qualifying policies include, but are not limited to, development standards improvements, permit processing improvements, dedicated ADU/JADU staff, technical assistance programs, and pre-approved ADU/JADU design
packages.
2 2
3C Adoption of other fee reduction strategies separate from Category (3)(A) above, including fee deferrals and reduced fees for housing for persons with special needs.
1 -
3D Promoting innovative housing types (e.g., manufactured homes, recreational vehicles, park models) that reduce development costs. 1 1
3E Measures that reduce costs for transportation-related infrastructure or programs that encourage active modes of transportation or other alternatives to automobiles. Qualifying policies include, but are not limited to, publicly funded programs to expand sidewalks or protect bike/micro-mobility lanes; creation of on-street parking for bikes; transit-related improvements; or establishment of carshare programs. 1 1
3F Adoption of universal design ordinances pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17959.
1 1
3G Establishment of pre-approved or prototype plans for missing middle housing types (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) in lowdensity, single-family residential areas. 1 -
3H Demonstration of other actions, not listed above, that quantifiably reduce construction or development costs.
1 -
TOTAL 11 8
81 Project Proposal
Category 4: Providing Financial Subsidies
Category Prohousing Policy Description Points Eligible
Points
4A Establishment of local housing trust funds or collaboration on a regional housing trust fund.
2 -
4B Provide grants or low-interest loans for ADU/JADU construction affordable to lower- and moderate-income households.
2 -
4C A comprehensive program that complies with the Surplus Land Act (Gov. Code, § 54220 et seq.) and that makes publicly owned land available for affordable housing, or for multifamily housing projects with the highest feasible percentage of units affordable to lower income households. A qualifying program may utilize mechanisms such as land donations, land sales with significant write-downs, or belowmarket land leases. 2 2
4D Establishment of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District or similar local financing tool that, to the extent feasible, directly supports housing developments in an area where at least 20 percent of the residences will be affordable to lower income households. 2 -
4E Directed residual redevelopment funds to affordable housing. 1 - 4F Development and regular (at least biennial) use of a housing subsidy pool, local or regional trust fund, or other similar funding source. 1 -
4G Prioritization of local general funds for affordable housing. 1 1 4H Demonstration of other actions, not listed above, that quantifiably promote, develop, or leverage financial resources for housing. 1 -
TOTAL 12 3
82 Project Proposal
Enhancement Factors
Category Prohousing Policy Description Points Eligible
Points
1 Policy that represents one element of a unified, multi-faceted strategy to promote multiple planning objectives, such as efficient land use, access to public transportation, affordable housing, climate change solutions, and/or hazard mitigation.
2 2
2 Policies that promote development consistent with the state planning priorities pursuant to Government Code section 65041.1. 1 1
3 Policies that diversify planning and target community and economic development investments (housing and non-housing) to improve lower opportunity areas. Such areas include, but are not limited to, Low Resource and High Segregation & Poverty areas designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps, and
disadvantaged communities pursuant to California Senate Bill 535 (2012).
1 1
4 Policies that go beyond state law requirements in reducing displacement of lower income households and conserving existing housing stock that is affordable to lower income households. 1 1
5 Rezoning and other policies that support high-density development in Location Efficient Communities.
1 1
6 Rezoning and other policies that result in a net gain of housing capacity while concurrently mitigating development impacts on or from Environmentally Sensitive or Hazardous Areas.
1 1
7 Zoning policies that increase housing choices and affordability in High Resource and Highest Resource areas, as designated in the most recently updated TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps.
1 -
8 Other policies that involve meaningful actions towards affirmatively furthering fair housing pursuant to Government Code section 8899.50, including, but not limited to, outreach campaigns, updated zoning codes, and expanded access to financing support.
1 -
TOTAL 9 7
83 Approved by: __________________________________
Jason Ledbetter, City Manager

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
TO: Yreka City Council
FROM: Jason Ledbetter, City Manager,
Matt Bray, Public Works Director
AGENDA TITLE: Discussion and Possible Action: Request to Hire Two additional Parks Maintenance Workers and Authorize a
Supplemental Budgetary Appropriation for the positions.

MEETING DATE: 01/03/2023
Discussion:

Public Works is requesting the additional hire of two parks maintenance workers to assist with the upkeep and maintenance of Yreka’s over 600 acres of parks and greenways. The employees would be paid for from the Greenhorn Reservoir Water and General Fund accounts.

Background:

The City Park and Recreation area system is comprised of eleven parks or areas which total over 600 acres. Currently, the Public Works Department Maintenance Division employs one full time Maintenance Worker assigned to parks, a part time (four hours per day) position to clean restrooms and collect garbage from City receptacles in parks and downtown, and a part-time/extra help position for three to four months in summer to assist the full-time employee with regular maintenance.

Prior to State Department of Motor Vehicle alterations of provisional driver licensing, it was typical to hire six or more high school age workers to assist with the seasonal workload. The alterations to the provisional driver’s licensing program, (for the City) effectively ended the long-standing high school summer staffing program. In addition, it has also been more and more difficult to attract summer college students, as many are not returning to Yreka for the summer or choosing other positions.

The Park and Recreation areas include roughly 42 acres of irrigated, maintained turf, 12 restrooms, flowerbeds, a skate park, the softball field at Miner Street Park, lighting, fencing, trails, tree trimming, weed eating, noxious weed removal, graffiti removal, and dam maintenance just to name a few.

Multiple years of State mandated water restrictions have complicated maintenance.

Coupled with a lack of staffing, our recreation system has experienced a measurable maintenance decline to its present condition. This is not fault of the workers assigned, but a result of years of budgetary constraints within the General Fund over time. 84 JANUARY 3, 2023
PAGE 2
2 The volume of deferred and general maintenance is not sustainable and can no longer be ignored.

The City Manager and Public Works Director are requesting Council support for two additional full-time (non-seasonal) employees to be added to the budget. Parks, recreation areas, and open spaces are cornerstones to a healthy and vibrant community and deserve the attention of Public Works.

Fiscal Impact:

Annual employee cost will vary between $95,000 to $115,000 depending upon placement on the salary schedule and health benefits. Expected average cost is $220,000 annually.

This is projected to be allocated about 50/50 between the General Operating Fund and the Greenhorn Reservoir Water Fund.

Business Analysis:

The Finance Committee met on December 21, 2022, to evaluate the business needs and available resources. The committee considered the escalating cost of underfunding and impacts of continued deferred maintenance to the City’s Park and Greenway system. The committee unanimously recommended bringing this need for additional staff and funding to the City Council for consideration.

The Finance Committee additionally recognizes that continued sustainability and funding of the City’s Park system is important: (1) recognizes the need for administrative staff to continue to pursue funding sources and (2) to develop a Parks Master Plan project to understand structural cost of each park/open area and find ways to ensure vibrancy of the City’s Park system.

Recommendation:

Motion that the City Council Approve the Request to Hire two additional Parks Maintenance Workers and Authorize a Supplemental Budgetary Appropriation for the positions.
85 Approved by: __________________________________
Jason Ledbetter, City Manager

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
TO: Yreka City Council
FROM: Jason Ledbetter, City Manager,
Matt Bray, Public Works Director
AGENDA TITLE: Discussion and Possible Action: Adopt a Resolution Designating Reserves from Gain on Sale of Real Property to fund a 95% Completion Study for Preliminary Design and
Engineering of the Ringe Park and Pool Complex, an
estimated cost of $500,000 to $750,000 and Authorizing the City Manager to issue a Request for Proposal/Qualifications for engineering and architectural design services.

MEETING DATE: 01/03/2023
Discussion:

The City has since 2021 realized one time money, gains recognized on the sale (and potential sale) of City owned properties. The City Manager and Public Works Director are requesting the designation of those reserves realized from sale of real property to be dedicated to the Ringe Park and Pool Complex to obtain engineering and architectural plans, that are “shovel ready” for construction bid and available grant opportunities where the City and project may be an eligible applicant. Additionally, the resolution authorizes the City Manager or his designee to issue a request for proposal or qualifications for engineering and architectural services. The budget for these services is somewhere between the range of $500,000 and $750,000 for a 95% completion study.

Background:

In September of 2018, McClelland Architecture and Planning Services, of Walnut Creek, CA issued a Ringe Pool Facility Condition Assessment Report (Ringe-PoolFeasibility-Study-PDF (civicplus.com) . The facility assessment report was requested by the City of Yreka Department of Public Works office and provided a detailed analysis, based on staff interviews, visual observations during the site observation visit, and information provided in the form of reports, drawings, and/or specifications. McClelland Architecture + Planning and its consultant team performed a site observation visit on July 18, 2018, to document existing conditions. During our on‐site visit, Kevin Cobb of the City of Yreka was interviewed or provided information, which we have relied upon in the assembly of this report. Mr. Cobb was designated as knowledgeable about the facility and related improvements. McClelland Architecture + Planning was also provided access to electronic copies of available as‐built document.

The essence of the study details that the entire structure (constructed in 1961) has exceeded its useful life, does not meet current building and ADA accessibility codes and 86 JANUARY 3, 2023
PAGE 2
2 that trying to rehabilitate the existing structure, as the reader goes through the study, quickly realizes that rehabilitation is not viable cost-effective option, and staff concluded that a full rebuild of the complex is the best solution.

Without engineering and architectural design plans, the City is handicapped in knowing the complexity and cost of the project. Therefore, an essential planning and building step in moving forward towards well planned and executed Ringe Park and Pool Complex project.

Fiscal Impact:

Gains realized from sale of real property to date total $448,000 and another $286,500 that may be available for sale (estimated total $734,500). Should any of the future gains not be realized, the City may dedicate other unrestricted reserves for the shortfall.

Business Analysis:

The Finance Committee met on December 21, 2022. The committee understands that key to the Ringe Park and Pool Complex project is understanding the scope and cost of construction. By having 95% complete engineering plans, the City is better able to move forward and would be better equipped to seek funding, either within the community or through eligible grants should an opportunity become available.

The Finance Committee recommended bring the proposal to the City Council for consideration.

Recommendation:

Motion that the City Council Adopt a Resolution 2023-03 Designating Reserves from Gain on Sale of Real Property to fund a 95% Completion Study for Preliminary Design and Engineering of the Ringe Park and Pool Complex, an estimated cost of $500,000 to $750,000 and Authorizing the City Manager to issue a RFP/RFQ for engineering and architectural design services.
87 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-03

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA

DESIGNATING RESERVES FROM GAIN ON SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO FUND A 95% COMPLETION STUDY FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND

ENGINEERING OF THE RINGE PARK AND POOL COMPLEX, AN ESTIMATED COST OF $500,000 TO $750,000, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

ISSUE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL/QUALIFICATIONS FOR ENGINEERING

AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City of Yreka is a municipal corporation with the legal authority to enter into contracts and agreements in the State of California, and WHEREAS, the City of Yreka is desirous of rebuilding the Ringe Park and Pool Complex and wants to obtain plans that are construction bid ready should a funding opportunity be found; and
WHEREAS, the City has a need for services which can only be performed by licensed Engineers and Architectural Design Services; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 4526 allows cities to select licensed professionals to perform specialized engineering work without a Request for Proposals if professionals are unresponsive; and
WHEREAS, the members of the City Council has determined it would be in the best interests of the City to approve appropriate from designated reserves for such study.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061(b)(3) approving agreements is an action exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that it is not a Project which has the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Environmental Review to satisfy CEQA requirements for the project will be completed before construction.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Council hereby finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct.

Section 2. The City Council of the City of Yreka does hereby find that the Agreement described herein is in the best interests of the City of Yreka, and the City Council does hereby authorize execution of said Agreement by the City Manager on behalf of the City of Yreka. The City Manager or designee to issue a request for proposal/qualifications for engineering and architectural design services is hereby further authorized and directed to execute such other agreements, documents and certificates, and to perform such other acts and deeds, as may be necessary or convenient to effect the 88 purposes of this Resolution and the transactions herein authorized, and the City Clerk or such Clerk's designee is hereby authorized and directed to affix the City's seal to said documents and to attest thereto.

Section 3. The Finance Director is authorized to appropriate this expenditure up to $750,000 into the budget covering the current fiscal year 2022-23 and future fiscal year 2023-24.

Section 4. It is further resolved, if any section, subsection, part, clause, sentence or phrase of this Resolution or the application thereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution, the application thereof, shall not be effected thereby but shall remain in full force and effect, it being the intention of the City Council to adopt each and every section, subsection, part, clause, sentence phrase regardless of whether any other section, subsection, part, clause, sentence or phrase or the application thereof is held to be invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

Passed and adopted this 3rd day of January 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Corey Middleton, Mayor
Attest:__________________
Rhetta Hogan,
City Clerk
89 Approved by: __________________________________
Jason Ledbetter, City Manager

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
TO: Yreka City Council
FROM: Mark Gilman, Chief of Police
AGENDA TITLE: Discussion and Possible Action: Restructuring the Response to Animal Control Calls for Services to ensure 24/7 coverage, expand training and provide more versatile resources at Yreka Police Department – by hiring a sworn Patrol Officer in lieu of an Animal Control Officer (currently a vacant position).

MEETING DATE: 01/03/2023
Discussion:

Restructuring the response to animal control calls for services to ensure continued 24/7 coverage, expanded training and more versatile resources at Yreka Police Department – by hiring a sworn patrol officer in lieu of a single Animal Control Officer (ACO).

Background:

As the Police Chief, I am requesting to transition the vacant Animal Control Officer position into a sworn Police Officer position. The reason for this is call volume statistics.

The previous year had a record number of calls for emergency service at YPD. This year we are approximately 9% above that. In evaluating options to perform effective patrol, including ACO functions, I feel can more effectively utilize a more versatile sworn Police Officer, instead of dedicating a full-time position for an Animal Control Officer.

The calls for service statistics support this.

A record check for YPD shows that from December 8, 2021, to December 8, 2022, there were 829 animal calls for service that accounted for 3% of the call volume. The department handled approximately 25,824 calls for all services over the same period.

That equates to 2.27 calls animal control per day versus nearly 70 calls per day for all police services.

Dogs do not know about M-F 8-5 work schedule of the ACO:

Most of the calls are after hours or weekends and sworn Police Officers are already handling those calls. There would no significant difference in the officer workload to handle animal control calls, and in fact the workload and calls for service would be more equitably distributed amongst the officers, with an additional sworn officer.

Sworn Officers are generally staffed with three officers per shift, two shifts a day. In October of 2022, each patrol officer averaged 20.06 calls per day each. By folding in the animal control calls, that equates to 0.38% increase in calls handled per officer per day, a 90 DECEMBER 13, 2022
PAGE 2
2 call volume for the most part they are already handling during off hours of the ACO position.

The benefits for adding an officer would be more effective patrol enforcement.

This year we also removed one officer from patrol duties and assigned him to the schools as a School Resource Officer, and though this has helped with the schools and has been a successful transition, the schools were only able to cover 2/3rds of the officers pay and commit to just a one-year contract term. For that reason, that officer’s vacant patrol position was not backfilled. This has left patrol down by an officer. The addition of an officer will free up a detective position and help make patrol more effective.

Fiscal Impact:

The annual cost differential between a sworn Officer and an Animal Control Officer will vary depending on the level of training (Peace Officer Standards Training – POST), the officer hired has attained. It is estimated to cost an additional $30,000-35,000 annually for a sworn officer.

Business Analysis:

The Finance Committee met December 21, 2022, to understand Police Chief Gilman’s proposal. The committee unanimously recommended bringing this to the City Council for consideration. The committee recommends restructuring the vacant ACO position to that of a sworn Patrol Officer.

Recommendation:

Motion that the City Council Approve the Restructuring the Response to Animal Control Calls for Services to ensure 24/7 coverage, expand training and provide more versatile resources at Yreka Police Department – by hiring a sworn Patrol Officer in lieu of an Animal Control Officer (currently a vacant position).
91

Yreka City CouncilJanuary 3, 2023

Yreka City Council
January 3, 2023