Agenda — Yreka City Council, February 7, 2023 (part 1 of 2)

Page 1 of 4 ends

Corey Middleton, Mayor
Paul McCoy, Mayor Pro tempore
Colleen Baker, Councilmember
Drake Davis, Councilmember
Duane Kegg, Councilmember
Jason Ledbetter, City Manager
Rhetta Hogan, Asst. City Manager and Clerk
Emily Aldrich, Finance Director
Matthew Bray, Public Works Director
John Elsnab, Human Resources Director
Mark Gilman, Police Chief
Dohn Henion, City Attorney
Jerry Lemos, Fire Chief
Juliana Lucchesi, Planning Director

YREKA CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
February 7, 2023
Regular Session: 6:30 PM
Yreka City Council Chamber, 701 Fourth Street, Yreka, CA Phone 530-841-2386, Facsimile 530-842-4836, email: [email protected] Regular Meetings of the Yreka City Council are held the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of every month.

The full agenda packet can be found on the City’s website: www.ci.yreka.ca.us/AgendaCenter

1. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND/OR ANNOUNCEMENTS:

This time slot is for informational presentations, appointments, or awards to be presented by the City Council or to the City Council.

3. PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Public participation is welcomed and invited at all City Council meetings. This time is set aside for residents to address the City Council on matters listed on the Consent Agenda as well as other items not included on the Regular Agenda. If your comments concern an item noted on the Regular Agenda, please address the Council when that item is open for public comment.

The City requests that persons addressing the City Council refrain from making personal, slanderous, profane, or disruptive remarks.

Councilmembers, when recognized by the Mayor, may ask questions of presenter but no action may be taken by the City Council during the public comment section of the meeting. Under the Brown Act, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not listed on the posted agenda.

Join this meeting via Zoom:

Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6194957056
Meeting ID# 619-495-7056
Members of the public may also remotely listen to and participate in the meeting via teleconference. If you wish to listen or participate in this meeting through teleconference, simply dial into the conference number below, and enter the meeting ID#.

Conference call in Number: 669-900-6833 (Toll-Free 888 788 0099) “RAISE YOUR HAND” to provide public comment for your desired item. Speakers will be asked to identify themselves.
• Online: If you are online, click on “raise hand” on the bottom of your screen. • Mobile App: In the mobile app, you can raise your hand by tapping the "Raise Hand" option in the "More" tab.
• Telephone: If you are calling in via telephone, to raise your hand, dial *9 (star-nine). Speakers will be called on by the last four digits of their phone number. To unmute yourself dial *6 (star-six). 1

Page 2 of 4 ends

This time is set aside for residents to address the City Council on matters listed on the Consent Agenda as well as other items not included on the Regular Agenda. If your comments concern an item noted on the Regular Agenda, please address the Council when that item is open for public comment. • Please speak into the microphone from the podium. The podium electronically adjusts up and down to accommodate speaker. (Should you need an additional special accommodation, e.g., remote microphone, please notice the City Clerk prior to the start of meeting for arrangements). • Please state your name for the record prior to providing your comments. • Please address the Council as a whole.
• If you have documents to present, please provide a minimum of seven (7) copies. • Please limit your remarks to five (5) minutes.

Public comments period is not intended to be a “Question and Answer” period or conversations with the Council or City staff.

4. PUBLIC COMMENT FOLLOW-UP:

This is the time for City Council or the City Manager to respond to public comments and may direct staff to prepare a report or place an item on a future agenda.

5. CONSENT AGENDA:

All matters listed under the consent agenda are considered routine and non-controversial and will be enacted by one motion unless any member of the Council wishes to remove an item for discussion, a. Approval/ratification of payments issued from December 13, 2022, through January 30, 2023. b. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting held January 17, 2023. c. Approval of Minutes of the Special Meeting held January 19, 2023. d. Approval of Minutes of the Special Meeting held January 24, 2023. e. Cash Balances, Budget to Actual and Fiscal Performance Reports for November 2022. f. Approval of the City’s Biannual Budget Preparation Calendar for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and 2024- 2025.
g. Continuation of Urgency Resolution #2021-51: Remote Public Meetings. h. Continuation of Urgency Ordinance #864: Fireworks.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopt the Consent Agenda of the City Council of the City of Yreka as presented.

6. OLD BUSINESS
Human Resources
a. Agenda Title: Approval of United Public Employees of California, LiUNA Local 792 (Yreka Management Employees Unit) Agreement
Representatives for the City and Yreka Management Employees Unit have met and agreed upon compensation over the next twenty-nine months for wages, benefits (including healthcare coverage) and other compensation (like standby pay, remote pay and deferred compensation).

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopt a Resolution 2023-04 of the City Council of the City of Yreka approving execution of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Yreka and the Yreka Management Employees Unit.
2

Page 3 of 4 ends

Planning Director
b. Agenda Title: Approval of the Final Draft 2023-2031 Housing Element The City of Yreka has prepared the 2023-2031 Housing Element update in compliance with State Housing Element Law and contains each off the elements mandated by state law, including but not limited to, identifying adequate sites for a variety of housing types and making adequate provision for the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the City.

The timeline below highlights the iterative public engage steps taken to prepare this plan:

Fiscal Impact: Most of the Federal and State agencies require assurances or certificates of compliance on state housing element being current. Failure to maintain an updated housing element would be reportable to Department of Water Resources, Department of Toxic Substances, California Housing and Community Development, CalFire, CalOES, Caltrans and Federal Agencies of HUD, USDA, EPA, EDA, USFS, FEMA. The City has active, pending and planned loan and grant applications with all of these agencies that total over $75,000,000.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to adopt Resolution 2023-05 “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka Adopting the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update and Approving the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Exemption Pursuant to CEQA Section 15061(b)(3)” Police Chief/City Manager
a. Agenda Title: Yreka High School Senior Prom on Miner Street Yreka High School’s Senior Prom is scheduled for May 13, 2023, from 8-11pm. We have speakers this evening to present the idea to City Council of the engagement level for and consideration of the event. Additionally, Police Chief Gilman, City Manager Ledbetter and City Attorney Henion will be addressing questions and concerns regarding the event.

Recommended City Council Action: Give staff direction in consideration of the Request made by the Yreka High School to close off a section of Miner Street and to allow the Juniors and Seniors to have prom on the City Streets. (Staff will bring back the special event documents at a future meeting based on the direction, as needed.)

7. CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS:

City Manager and Staff may make brief announcements or reports at this time. 3

Page 4 of 4 ends

8. MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBERS REPORTS, STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS:

AB 1234* Conference and Meeting Report (verbal, if any) *(In accordance with AB 1234, Councilmembers shall make a brief report or file a written report on any meeting/event/conference attended at City expense.) Members of the Council may make brief announcements, reports, or request staff to report to Council on any matter at a subsequent meeting.

9. ADJOURNMENT:

In compliance with the requirements of the Brown Act, notice of this meeting has been posted in a publicly accessible place, 72 hours in advance of the meeting.

All documents produced by the City which are related to an open session agenda item and distributed to the City Council are made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office during normal business hours.

Public Hearings: If, in the future, you wish to challenge in court any of the matters on an agenda for which a public hearing is to be conducted, you may be limited to raising only those issues which you (or someone else) raised orally at the public hearing or in written correspondence received by the City at or before the hearing. Any person seeking to challenge a City Council decision made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes “final.”
"CHALLENGING DECISIONS OF CITY ENTITIES The time limit within which to commence any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City of Yreka is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, unless a shorter limitation period is specified by any other provision, including without limitation Government Code section 65009 applicable to many land use and zoning decisions, Government Code section 66499.37 applicable to the Subdivision Map Act, and Public Resources Code section 21167 applicable to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Under Section 1094.6, any lawsuit or legal challenge to any quasi-adjudicative decision made by the City must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which such decision becomes final. Any lawsuit or legal challenge, which is not filed within that 90-day period, will be barred. Government Code section 65009 and 66499.37, and Public Resources Code section 21167, impose shorter limitations periods and requirements, including timely service in addition to filing. If a person wishes to challenge the above actions in court, they may be limited to raising only those issues they or someone else raised at the meeting described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Yreka, at or prior to the meeting. In addition, judicial challenge may be limited or barred where the interested party has not sought and exhausted all available administrative remedies." The City of Yreka does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, age, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or any other legally protected classes in employment or provision of services. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, those requiring accommodations for this meeting should notify the City Clerk 48 hours prior to the meeting at (530) 841-2386 or by notifying the Clerk at [email protected].

AFFIDAVIT OF NOTIFICATION AND POSTING

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF SISKIYOU) SS

CITY OF YREKA )
I, Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk for the City of Yreka, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that a copy of the above Agenda of the Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Yreka, California, was delivered and/or notice by email not less than 72 hours, before the hour of 6:30 p.m. on February 7, 2023 to the members of the governing agency, and caused the agenda to be posted on the City’s website at www.ci.yreka.ca.us and posted at Yreka City Hall, 701 Fourth St., Yreka, California. /s/: Rhetta Hogan
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31

Page 1 of 5 ends

MINUTES OF THE YREKA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
HELD ON JANUARY 17, 2023
Yreka City Council Chamber, 701 Fourth Street, Yreka, CA Phone 530-841-2386, Facsimile 530-842-4836, email: [email protected]

1. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

On January 17, 2023, the City Council of Yreka, met for a Regular meeting at 6:30 p.m. and upon roll call, the following Councilmembers were present: Colleen Baker, Drake Davis, Duane Kegg, Paul McCoy, and Corey Middleton.

2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND/OR ANNOUNCEMENTS:

This time slot is for informational presentations, appointments, or awards to be presented by the City Council or to the City Council.

Swearing in of Planning Commissioner Marlee Billingsley by the Yreka City Clerk.

Planning Director, Juliana Lucchesi will present the Final Draft Housing Element 2023-2031.

A presentation was heard from Juliana Lucchesi and a special meeting on January 24, 2023, is scheduled to discuss the Final Draft Housing Element 2023-2031.

3. PUBLIC COMMENTS:

The City requests that persons addressing the City Council refrain from making personal, slanderous, profane, or disruptive remarks.

Councilmembers, when recognized by the mayor, may ask questions of presenter but no action may be taken by the City Council during the public comment section of the meeting. Under the Brown Act, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not listed on the posted agenda.

Page 2 of 5 ends

• Please speak into the microphone from the podium. The podium electronically adjusts up and down to accommodate speaker. (Should you need an additional special accommodation, e.g., remote microphone, please notice the City Clerk prior to the start of meeting for arrangements). • Please state your name for the record prior to providing your comments. • Please address the Council as a whole.
• If you have documents to present, please provide a minimum of seven (7) copies. • Please limit your remarks to five (5) minutes.

Public comments period is not intended to be a “Question and Answer” period or conversations with the Council or City staff.

Public Comments were heard from Jan Osborn, Dawnmarie Autrey, and Diane Collier

4. PUBLIC COMMENT FOLLOW-UP:

This is the time for City Council or the City Manager to respond to public comments and may direct staff to prepare a report or place an item on a future agenda.

5. CONSENT AGENDA:

All matters listed under the consent agenda are considered routine and non-controversial and will be enacted by one motion unless any member of the Council wishes to remove an item for discussion, a. Approval/ratification of payments issued from December 27, 2022, through January 08, 2023. b. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting held January 3, 2023, and Special Meeting held January 10, 2023.
c. Financial Report on Investments as of September 30, 2022. d. Cash Balances, Budget to Actual and Fiscal Performance Reports for October 2022. e. Resolution 2023-02 Recognizing the City of Yreka’s 2023 Contribution to Employees Healthcare Costs through the IRS Section 125 Cafeteria Plan.
f. Continuation of Urgency Resolution #2021-51: Remote Public Meetings. g. Continuation of Urgency Ordinance #864: Fireworks.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopt the Consent Agenda of the City Council of the City of Yreka as presented.

Motion to Adopt the Consent Agenda of the City Council of the City of Yreka as presented except for item

5.g. Continuation of Urgency Ordinance #864: Fireworks.

Public comment Dawnmarie Autrey.

MOTIONED: Councilmember McCoy
SECONDED: Councilmember Kegg
AYES: Councilmembers Baker, Davis, Kegg, McCoy, and Middleton NOES: -0-
ABSENT: -0-
Motion to Adopt the Consent Agenda item 5.g. Continuation of Urgency Ordinance #864: Fireworks.

Public comment Dawnmarie Autrey, Diane Collier.

MOTIONED: Councilmember Davis
SECONDED: Councilmember McCoy
AYES: Councilmembers Baker, Davis, Kegg, McCoy, and Middleton NOES: -0-
33

Page 3 of 5 ends

ABSENT: -0-
Discussion and direction to staff to bring back Fireworks Urgency Ordinance for reconsideration when Fire Chief Lemos is available.

6. OLD BUSINESS
Human Resources
a. Agenda Title: Approval of City Manager Employment Agreement The Yreka City Manager Employment Agreement has been rewritten reflect some of the compensation (salary and benefits) recently afforded to employees of the City of Yreka through collective bargaining. The City Manager as an at will employee serves at the pleasure of the Yreka City Council.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Approve the City Manager Employment Agreement.

Motion to Approve the City Manager Employment Agreement.

Public comment Dawnmarie Autrey.

MOTIONED: Councilmember Davis
SECONDED: Councilmember Baker
AYES: Councilmembers Baker, Davis, Kegg, McCoy, and Middleton NOES: -0-
ABSENT: -0-

7. NEW BUSINESS:

City Manager
a. Agenda Title: Presentation and Possible Adoption of the Yreka Community Action Plan: Recreation Economy for Rural Communities.

The Siskiyou Economic Development Council, along with a group of local partners and organizations, applied to the Recreation Economy for Rural Communities program in hopes of combining Yreka’s progress on sustainable land use and brownfields assessment with nearby outdoor recreation resources to create an action plan that supports local business, employment, and economy in ways that respect the area’s people, environment, and history.

Recommended City Council Action: Motion to Adopt the Yreka Community Action Plan:

Recreation Economy for Rural Communities.

City Council took a short recess at 7:37PM and the meeting resumed at 7:48PM Motion to Adopt the Yreka Community Action Plan: Recreation Economy for Rural Communities.

Public comment Jan Osborn, Dawnmarie Autrey, Louise Gliatto, Diane Collier, and Lorenzo Love MOTIONED: Councilmember McCoy
SECONDED: Councilmember Davis
AYES: Councilmembers Baker, Davis, Kegg, McCoy, and Middleton NOES: -0-
ABSENT: -0-
b. Agenda Title: Request to Change the Meeting Date for City Council Meetings from Tuesday Nights to Thursday Nights
34

Page 4 of 5 ends

At the City Council meeting held on December 20, 2022, City Councilmember Duane Kegg requested that an item be placed on a future Council Meeting to change the City Council meeting nights from Tuesday to Thursday.

Recommended City Council Action: Discussion and possible action: Staff from an operational efficiency viewpoint is not in support of the meeting weekday change from Tuesday to Thursday evenings, however staff supports the City Council in its endeavor to conduct the City’s business.

Motion to draft an ordinance to schedule the City Council meetings to Thursday night.

Motion: Duane Kegg
Motion failed due to lack of a second.

8. MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBERS REPORTS
AB 1234* Conference and Meeting Report (verbal, if any) *(In accordance with AB 1234, Councilmembers shall make a brief report or file a written report on any meeting/event/conference attended at City expense.)
Councilmember McCoy spoke on events during his ride along with Yreka Police Department on patrol.

Councilmember Colleen Baker reported that she attended a Cannabis and Community Development Webinar hosted by the League of Cities.

Mayor Corey Middleton and Councilmember Drake Davis spoke on attending the League of Local Agencies dinner and presentations.

Councilmember Duane Kegg reported on the COC Point in Time unhoused “homeless” counted. Training for volunteers is tomorrow (1/18/2023) and the following Wednesday (1/25/2023) is the actual event, and Councilmember Kegg called out the many agencies participating.

9. CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS:

City Manager and Staff may make brief announcements or reports at this time.

Jason Ledbetter, City Manager, thanked Ken Barnes, and Black Barts in Yreka hosting the LOLA Dinner. Jason Ledbetter is attending the City Managers Conference in Carlsbad February 6-10, 2023, he will be available that week while working and attending City Council February 7, 2023, via Zoom. Jason Ledbetter spoke to the many upcoming meetings:

January 18, 2023, Planning Commission with new Commissioners Anne Ohlund and Marlee Billingsley January 19, 2023, Ad-Hoc Fire Committee is meeting 7:30AM at 810 N Oregon January 19, 2023, Finance Committee 11AM, 701 Fourth Street.

January 19, 2023, Special Meeting, Closed session 6PM, 701 Fourth Street January 24, 2023, Special Meeting, Yreka City Council, 701 Fourth Street Additionally, a Warming Center will be open Thursday and Friday nights at the Yreka Methodist Church on Fairchild, Yreka.

10. COUNCILMEMBER STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS:

Members of the Council may make brief announcements, reports, or request staff to report to Council on any matter at a subsequent meeting.

Councilmember Baker suggested that staff have an educational outreach on how to connect with the city on future alerts. City Manager sought direction to have City staff bring forward a Communication Ad Hoc Committee proposal. Councilmember Baker was interested in the development of the policy to address written (electronic – emailed) public comments.
35

Page 5 of 5 ends

Councilmember Davis mentioned that the College of the Siskiyou’s is considering reopening their nursing program soon in Yreka. Dr. Collard was thanked for her presentation at the League of Local Agencies dinner.

Councilmember Kegg requested an update on the Urban Campground the City Manager at a future meeting in late February.

11. ADJOURNMENT:

The meeting was adjourned at 9:27 p.m.
36

Page 1 of 1 ends

YREKA CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
January 19, 2023
Special Meeting Closed Session Only - Start Time: 6:00 PM Yreka City Council Chamber, 701 Fourth Street, Yreka, CA Phone 530-841-2386, Facsimile 530-842-4836, email: [email protected]

1. 6:00PM CALL TO ORDER SPECIAL SESSION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

Present: Councilmembers Colleen Baker, Drake Davis, Duane Kegg, Paul McCoy and Corey Middleton.

Mayor Middleton called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

2. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION:

There was no public comment.

3. CLOSED SESSION:

The City Council will recess to Closed Session to discuss the following item(s). At the conclusion of the Closed Session, Open Session will reconvene and reportable action, if any, will be announced:
a. Public Employee Performance Evaluation § 54957
Title: City Attorney

4. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION:

Mayor Middleton announced that there was not reportable action from Closed Session.

5. ADJOURNMENT:

The meeting was adjourned before 8:00 p.m.
____________________
Corey Middleton, Mayor
Minutes approved by City Council,
Motion February 7, 2023
______________________
Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk
37

Page 1 of 3 ends

YREKA CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
January 24, 2023
Special Meeting Start Time: 5:30 PM
Housing Element Workshop Start Time: 6:30PM
Yreka City Council Chamber, 701 Fourth Street, Yreka, CA Phone 530-841-2386, Facsimile 530-842-4836, email: [email protected]

1. 5:30PM CALL TO ORDER SPECIAL SESSION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

Present: Councilmembers Colleen Baker, Drake J. Davis, Duane Kegg, Paul McCoy and Corey Middleton.

Mayor Middleton called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.

After the pledge, there was a call for public comment. There was no public comment.

2. NEW BUSINESS
City Manager and Planning Director
A. Agenda Title: Request for Deferral of Fire Sprinkler Building Requirement for 202 and 204 Turre Street APN 061-272-180)
The City Manager has received a request for deferral from Rob O’Gorman, contractor for the reconstruction of 202 and 204 Turre Street due to fire damage that occurred in October of 2021. The Applicant requests deferral or exemption to implement California Building Code and California Fire Code Section 903 “Automatic Sprinkler Systems”. City Council will consider a number of options related to this request.

Recommended City Council Action: Give direction to City Staff. (Recommendation was that request for deferment die without a recommendation for a motion.)
Public comment was heard from Dawnmarie Autrey and Lorenzo Love.

No motion was made by the City Council to override the California Building Code and California Fire Code Section 903 “Automatic Sprinkler Systems”.

3. RECESS TO 6:30PM:

At 6:33PM the meeting recessed for five minutes.

4. 6:30PM CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
38

Page 2 of 3 ends

Meeting was resumed and called to order at 6:42PM after a brief recess. The Mayor moved directly to the special presentation 7. Special Presentations: Final Draft 2023-2031 Housing Element.

5. PUBLIC COMMENTS:

The City requests that persons addressing the City Council refrain from making personal, slanderous, profane, or disruptive remarks.

Public comments period is not intended to be a “Question and Answer” period or conversations with the Council or City staff.

6. PUBLIC COMMENT FOLLOW-UP:

This is the time for City Council or the City Manager to respond to public comments and may direct staff to prepare a report or place an item on a future agenda.

7. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND/OR ANNOUNCEMENTS:

This time slot is for informational presentations, appointments, or awards to be presented by the City Council or to the City Council.

Final Draft 2023-2031 Housing Element
The City Council will review and consider the final draft of the 2023-2031 Housing Element. The City Council and members of the public are welcome to give public comment on the proposed final draft. https://ca-yreka.civicplus.com/DocumentCenter/View/1349/Final-Draft-2023-2031-HousingElement?bidId= Planning Director Juliana Lucchesi presented changes from the City Council approved draft housing element to the current draft incorporating the California Department of Housing comments.

Mayor Middleton surveyed by a raise of hands the number of speakers in the audience and online for public comment on the housing element final draft and for general public comment. Mayor Middleton opened up all public comment to five minutes.
39

Page 3 of 3 ends

Public comment regarding the Final Draft 2023-2031 Housing Element was heard from Debbie Bacigalupi, Louise Gliatto, Jan Osborne, Bill Schmidt, Debbie Bacigalupi (again), and Dawn Marie Autry.

Mayor Pro Tempore McCoy announced that the Continuum of Care Point in Time count is tomorrow, January 25, 2023.

8. ADJOURNMENT:

The meeting was adjourned at 8:06 p.m.

____________________
Corey Middleton, Mayor
Minutes approved by City Council,
Motion on February 7, 2023
______________________
Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk
40 Fund Type Fund Fund Description Previous Balance
Receipts /
Debits
Disbursements /
Credits
Cash Balance by
Fund
General-Unrestricted 01 General Operating $ 845,518.91 7,799,003.51 $ 598,142.01 $ 8,046,380.41 $ General-Designated 01 General Oper. - Other - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Comm Art - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Fire Museum - 3,322.35 - 3,322.35 General-Designated 01 Planning Deposits - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Sidewalk in Lieu - 39,278.46 - 39,278.46 General-Designated 01 Parkland Trust - 300.00 - 300.00
General-Designated 01 Police Asset Forfeit - 12,239.86 - 12,239.86 General-Designated 01 Parking Fees - - - 0.00
General-Designated 01 Campbell Tract Redemption - - - 0.00 General-Designated 02 Gifts Donations - 25,653.63 - 25,653.63 General-Designated 02 K-9 Unit - - - 0.00
General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Hitson - 4,812.02 - 4,812.02 General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Travellers - 741.68 - 741.68 General-Designated 02 YPD Donated - Teen Fund - 3,956.43 - 3,956.43 General-Designated 03 YVFD Volunter Fund 2,238.41 - 52.91 2,185.50 General-Restricted 04 Crandell Cash 441,187.74 57.72 27,319.97 413,925.49 General-Restricted 05 Property Abatement Recovery 42,114.88 - - 42,114.88 General-Designated 08 Grant Projects Reserve 1,334,085.73 - 1,334,085.73 - General-Designated 08 PERS Pension Liability Reserve - - - 0.00 General-Designated 09 Reserves for Cap. Outlay 831,125.62 - - 831,125.62 General-Designated 10 Capital Outlay 241,821.35 - - 241,821.35 General-Designated 11 Capital Building Project - YPD (1,015.34) - 172.89 (1,188.23) General - All General-Designated 12 Debt Servicing - GF (YPD Bldg) 277,625.64 - - 277,625.64 General-Designated 12 Debt Servicing Reserves - GF (YPD Bldg) 200,000.00 - - 200,000.00 General-Designated 90 Payroll Clearing (742,774.33) 604,663.42 499,971.80 (638,082.71) 10,840,298.11 $ Spec. Rev. -Streets 20 Road and Street Funds including HUTA 212,554.53 50,988.74 69,721.70 193,821.57 Spec. Rev. -Streets 21 Local Transportation 600,369.69 1,469.40 - 601,839.09 Streets Spec. Rev. -Streets 24 Fines - Traffic Safety 188,509.17 1,023.08 5,809.22 183,723.03 979,383.69 $ Special Revenue 30 Fire Assessment Spec. Rev 1,109,612.60 26,888.57 7,560.52 1,128,940.65 Special Revenue 31 Landfill Access Fee - Debt Service (67,942.23) 20,188.40 1,264.93 (49,018.76) Special Revenues Special Revenue 32 Developer Impact Fees 220,783.04 - - 220,783.04 $ 1,300,704.93 Special Grants 60 Spec Grants Capital Outlay 1,618,846.82 - 11,484.87 1,607,361.95 Special Grants Special Grants 65 Community Development Grants 920,708.91 1,034.38 763.13 920,980.16 SpecialOperating 67 SUMIT Operating 702,929.95 - - 702,929.95 $ 3,231,272.06 Water Enterprise 70 Water Operating 143,966.09 304,501.07 315,436.39 133,030.77 Water Enterprise 71 Water Capital Projects (2,260,042.30) 26,656.35 801,849.09 (3,035,235.04) Water Enterprise 72 Water Debt Servicing 497,424.40 - 7,187.66 490,236.74 Water Enterprise 72 USDA COPS 2010 300,000.00 - - 300,000.00 Water Enterprise Water Enterprise 74 Water Reserves 5,329,520.05 102,015.35 5,431,535.40 - $ 3,319,567.87 Sewer Enterprise 80 Sewer Operating 515,198.30 243,865.09 191,429.21 567,634.18 Sewer Enterprise 81 Sewer Capital Outlay (174,188.91) 293,444.80 372,125.74 (252,869.85) Sewer Enterprise 82 Sewer Debt Servicing 458,721.00 292,941.16 292,941.16 458,721.00 Sewer Enterprise 82 USDA COPS 2003 250,000.00 - - 250,000.00 Enterprise-Sewer Sewer Enterprise 84 Sewer Reserves 4,952,447.84 59,110.89 5,011,558.73 - $ 6,035,044.06 Agency
Agency 92 Agency SUMIT - Cash 19,219.49 - - 19,219.49 $ 19,219.49 COLUMN TOTALS $ 26,054,356.08 $ 2,874,367.33 $ 3,203,233.20 $ 25,725,490.21 $ 25,725,490.21 -
BANK RECAPITULATION PER BANK Market Value Unrealized Gain PER LEDGER L.A.I.F. 0.861% 21,090,174.02 20,818,646.76 (271,527.26) Pershing Bank - CD & Treas Investments 2,452,000.00 2,383,646.73 (68,353.27) Pershing Bank - Cash 257,932.60
Petty Cash Drawers 1,200.00
YVFD Petty Cash -
Banner Bank (DDA for Bank Anticipation No 1,349.17
MB SUMIT Operating x2233 705,233.99
MB SUMIT Asset Forfeiture X4281 19,219.49
Mechanics Bank - 01015102 1,268,787.94
TOTAL PER BANK 25,795,897.21

ADJUSTMENTS
Less Outstanding Checks MB (65,693.65)
Less Outstanding Checks SVB SUMIT (2,304.04)
Interest CR (GL ) November 2022 (9.72)
Transfer 11/29 - Posted 12/01 at Bank 3,977.74
Transfer 11/30 - Posted 12/02 at Bank 3,472.17
PERS Health (3,658.42)
BRMS Card (7.69)
VSP (14.39)
CalPERS Reimbursment 5,965.49
Banner Interest (0.66)
MBSC Interest - Nov (4,974.05)
MBSC Interest - Oct (7,159.78)
TOTAL PER LEDGER 25,725,490.21 25,725,490.21
(0.00)
Corey Middleton, City Mayor
Emily Aldrich, Finance Director

CITY OF YREKA

REPORT ON CASH TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Nov-2022
41 2022-2023 Operating Budget of Revenue and Expenditures with Year to Date Actual Results November 30, 2022
Fund AnalysisMajor Grp Fund Adopted Operating Budget Year to Date 3 Adopted Operating Budget Year to Date 4 Operating Budget Net Actual
Year to Date
Current Cash
Balance
Investment in LAIF 00 - - - - - - -
General Operating 01 7,474,244.57 7,923,861.07 3,268,068.00 7,854,692.39 7,854,692.39 3,087,350.88 180,717.12 69,168.68 8,101,521.08 General Operating Fund 7,474,244.57 7,923,861.07 3,268,068.00 7,854,692.39 7,854,692.39 3,087,350.88 69,168.68 180,717.12 8,101,521.08Gifts Donations 02 - - 10,307.43 700.00 700.00 2,860.50 (700.00) 7,446.93 35,163.76 YVFD Volunter Fund 03 13,500.00 13,500.00 - 13,500.00 13,500.00 445.17 - (445.17) 2,185.50 Trusts -Crandell-Stewart 04 - - 2,238.50 2,050.00 2,050.00 27,262.25 (2,050.00) (25,023.75) 413,925.49 Property Abatement 05 - - - - - 16,431.61 - (16,431.61) 42,114.88General Fund Reserves 08 - - 52,098.17 - - - - 52,098.17 1,334,085.73 Reserves for Cap. Outlay 09 - - - - - - - - 831,125.62
Capital Outlay 10 82,500.00 82,500.00 - 82,500.00 82,500.00 (43,770.35) - 43,770.35 241,821.35 Construction Fund 11 - - - - - 1,075.49 - (1,075.49) (1,188.23)General Fund Debt Servicing 12 125,895.00 125,895.00 - 125,895.00 125,895.00 22,426.25 - (22,426.25) 477,625.64 Payroll Clearing 90 - - - - 103,679.87 - (103,679.87) - (638,082.71) General Fund - Restricted or Designated 221,895.00 221,895.00 64,644.10 224,645.00 224,645.00 130,410.79 (2,750.00) (65,766.69) 2,738,777.03 Total General Fund 7,696,139.57 8,145,756.07 3,332,712.10 8,079,337.39 8,079,337.39 3,217,761.67 66,418.68 114,950.43 10,840,298.11Gas Tax & Traffic Cong. 20 954,702.40 954,702.40 198,536.42 954,702.44 954,702.44 391,824.96 (0.04) (193,288.54) 193,821.57 Local Transportation 21 200,000.00 200,000.00 226,876.45 200,000.00 200,000.00 - - 226,876.45 601,839.09 Fines - Traffic Safety 24 68,164.14 68,164.14 6,655.79 68,164.14 68,164.14 28,681.08 - (22,025.29) 183,723.03 Road, Street & Transit - Restricted 1,222,866.54 1,222,866.54 432,068.66 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 420,506.04 (0.04) 11,562.62 979,383.69 Total Road, Streets and Transit 1,222,866.54 1,222,866.54 432,068.66 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 420,506.04 (0.04) 11,562.62 979,383.69 Fire Assessment Spec. Rev 30 307,500.00 307,500.00 138,138.77 105,726.24 105,726.24 37,802.60 201,773.76 100,336.17 1,128,940.65 Landfill Access Fee - Debt Service 31 240,000.00 240,000.00 100,515.08 240,000.01 240,000.01 178,807.81 (0.01) (78,292.73) (49,018.76) Developer Impact Fees 32 16,000.00 16,000.00 1,328.40 9,500.00 9,500.00 - 6,500.00 1,328.40 220,783.04 Special Revenue - Restricted 563,500.00 563,500.00 239,982.25 355,226.25 355,226.25 216,610.41 208,273.75 23,371.84 1,300,704.93 Total Special Revenue 563,500.00 563,500.00 239,982.25 355,226.25 355,226.25 216,610.41 208,273.75 23,371.84 1,300,704.93 Spec Grants Capital Outlay 60 2,249,000.00 2,249,000.00 162,811.22 2,249,000.00 2,249,000.00 157,451.25 - 5,359.97 1,607,361.95 Community Development Grants 65 750,600.00 750,600.00 4,926.70 800,750.00 800,750.00 3,801.30 (50,150.00) 1,125.40 920,980.16 SUMIT Operating Fund 67 - - - - - - - - 702,929.95
Special Grants - Capital Projects 2,999,600.00 2,999,600.00 167,737.92 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 161,252.55 (50,150.00) 6,485.37 3,231,272.06Special Grants - Operating & Capital Projects 2,999,600.00 2,999,600.00 167,737.92 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 161,252.55 (50,150.00) 6,485.37 3,231,272.06 Water Operating 70 2,585,884.55 2,585,884.55 1,141,005.82 2,585,884.53 2,585,884.53 1,031,163.73 109,842.09 0.02 133,030.77 Water Capital Projects 71 2,853,117.00 7,873,117.00 - 2,853,117.00 7,873,117.00 3,035,235.04 (3,035,235.04) - (3,035,235.04) Water Debt Servicing 72 356,738.17 356,738.17 - 349,238.17 349,238.17 (29,523.46) 29,523.46 7,500.00 790,236.74Water Reserves 74 (916,687.72) (1,197,687.72) 322,585.30 - - - 322,585.30 (1,197,687.72) 5,431,535.40 Water Enterprise 4,879,052.00 9,618,052.00 1,463,591.12 5,788,239.70 10,808,239.70 4,036,875.31 (1,190,187.70) (2,573,284.19) 3,319,567.87 Sewer Operating 80 2,360,449.98 2,360,449.98 896,961.21 2,360,449.97 2,360,449.97 714,464.14 0.01 182,497.07 567,634.18 Sewer Capital Outlay 81 9,326,680.00 9,326,680.00 556,799.59 9,326,680.00 9,518,080.00 809,669.44 (191,400.00) (252,869.85) (252,869.85) Sewer Debt Servicing 82 318,855.00 318,855.00 (556,799.57) 316,855.00 316,855.00 (1,168.75) 2,000.00 (555,630.82) 708,721.00 Sewer Reserves 84 (764,015.98) (764,015.98) 242,849.39 - - - (764,015.98) 242,849.39 5,011,558.73 Sewer Enterprise Fund 11,241,969.00 11,241,969.00 1,139,810.62 12,003,984.97 12,195,384.97 1,522,964.83 (953,415.97) (383,154.21) 6,035,044.06Total Enterprise Funds 16,121,021.00 20,860,021.00 2,603,401.74 17,792,224.67 23,003,624.67 5,559,840.14 (2,143,603.67) (2,956,438.40) 9,354,611.93 SUMIT Agency Trust - Cash 92 - - - - - - - - 19,219.49
Agency Funds - - - - - - - - 19,219.49 \
Total Agency Funds - - - - - - - - 19,219.49
All Funds Combined 33,791,743.61 28,603,127.11 6,775,902.67 30,499,404.89 35,710,804.89 9,575,970.81 (1,919,061.28) (2,800,068.14) 25,725,490.21 Excess of Rev over Exp.-Surplus/
R E V E N U E E X P E N S E (Deficit)
Approval:______________________________________________________Corey Middleton, Mayor 1/31/2023 7:59 AM 42 City of Yreka Financial Statement Groupings
Summary FY 22-23 YTD Fiscal Performance
as of November 30, 2022
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt

1. GENERAL FUNDSRevenue
801 REVENUE: PROP TAXES 1,208,650.00 1,208,650.00 163,649.26 -1,045,000.74807 MVLF IN LIEU 650,000.00 0.00 -650,000.00 650,000.00810 SALES TAX 3,600,000.00 1,895,027.25 -1,704,972.75 3,600,000.00813 REVENUE: TOT TAXES 830,000.00 700,804.00 -129,196.00 830,000.00814 REVENUE: FRANCHISE FEES 285,000.00 80,180.99 -204,819.01 285,000.00815 REVENUE - LICENSES AND PERMITS 189,900.00 107,666.63 -82,233.37 189,900.00825 REVENUE - FINES & FORFEITURES 250.00 -1,244.46 -1,494.46 250.00830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 70,800.00 -106,833.97 -177,633.97 70,800.00850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 348,417.57 197,480.90 -600,553.17 798,034.07870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 50,825.00 16,287.99 -34,537.01 50,825.00880 ICA ALLOCATION 445,797.00 185,000.00 -260,797.00 445,797.00882 REVENUE - OTHER 16,500.00 94,693.51 78,193.51 16,500.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1. GENERAL FUNDS Revenue Totals 7,696,139.57 8,145,756.07 3,332,712.10 -4,813,043.97Expense 100 MAYOR, COUNCIL, CITY MANAGER, CLERK 432,382.41 432,382.41 138,829.53 293,552.88110 EXP. GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1,000,856.81 824,238.42 176,618.39 1,000,856.81130 PUBLIC SAFETY CODE ENFORCEMENT 124,003.29 62,212.53 61,790.76 124,003.29200 PUBLIC SAFETY - POLICE 3,764,055.55 1,324,677.16 2,439,378.39 3,764,055.55 Thursday, January 26, 2023 Page 1 of 8
43 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
210 PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE 688,288.33 688,288.33 163,231.23 525,057.10220 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 556,999.77 305,526.93 251,472.84 556,999.77300 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING AND ADMIN 150,103.38 26,252.60 123,850.78 150,103.38350 PUBLIC WORKS - MECHANICAL MAINT (ELIM) 0.01 231,375.75 -231,375.74 0.01370 PUBLIC WORKS - SERVICE CENTER (ELIM) 0.00 12,155.88 -12,155.88 0.00400 CULTURAL & REC - PARKS AND REC 574,386.30 164,019.04 410,367.26 574,386.30645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 72,500.00 -57,183.65 129,683.65 72,500.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 35,000.00 0.00 35,000.00 35,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 90,895.00 22,426.25 68,468.75 90,895.00760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 589,866.54 0.00 589,866.54 589,866.54

1. GENERAL FUNDS Expense Totals 8,079,337.39 8,079,337.39 3,217,761.67 4,861,575.721. GENERAL FUNDS Net Position Change -383,197.82 66,418.68 114,950.43 48,531.75 Thursday, January 26, 2023 Page 2 of 8
44 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 1. GENERAL FUNDS (995 detail records)2. STREETS FUNDSRevenue 825 REVENUE - FINES & FORFEITURES 15,000.00 15,000.00 5,612.61 -9,387.39830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3,500.00 5,143.20 1,643.20 3,500.00850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 614,500.00 410,378.96 -204,121.04 614,500.00887 REVENUE: INKIND 0.00 10,933.89 10,933.89 0.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 589,866.54 0.00 -589,866.54 589,866.54

2. STREETS FUNDS Revenue Totals 1,222,866.54 1,222,866.54 432,068.66 -790,797.88Expense 300 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING AND ADMIN 62,542.43 62,542.43 17,912.82 44,629.61310 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET MAINTENANCE 430,564.36 305,942.65 124,621.71 430,564.36311 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET SWEEPING 85,522.92 16,523.63 68,999.29 85,522.92312 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET LIGHTING 56,144.97 12,869.12 43,275.85 56,144.97313 PUBLIC WORKS - WEED CONTROL STREETS 10,995.72 2,237.49 8,758.23 10,995.72314 PUBLIC WORKS - PUBLIC PARKING LOTS 2,373.41 405.85 1,967.56 2,373.41320 PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC SAFETY 68,164.14 68,164.14 28,681.08 39,483.06340 TRANSPORTATION 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 200,000.00390 PUBLIC WORKS - STORM DRAINS 171,558.63 35,933.40 135,625.23 171,558.63645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 40,000.00 0.00 40,000.00 40,000.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 90,000.00 0.00 90,000.00 90,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00

2. STREETS FUNDS Expense Totals 1,222,866.58 1,222,866.58 420,506.04 802,360.542. STREETS FUNDS Net Position Change -0.04 -0.04 11,562.62 11,562.66 Thursday, January 26, 2023 Page 3 of 8
45 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 2. STREETS FUNDS (278 detail records)3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDSRevenue 811 OTHER TAXES 305,000.00 305,000.00 132,680.36 -172,319.64815 REVENUE - LICENSES AND PERMITS 16,000.00 0.00 -16,000.00 16,000.00830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2,500.00 6,786.81 4,286.81 2,500.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 240,000.00 100,515.08 -139,484.92 240,000.00

3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Revenue Totals 563,500.00 563,500.00 239,982.25 -323,517.75Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 65,000.01 65,000.01 3,807.81 61,192.20210 PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 15,000.00645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 185,708.43 139,293.08 46,415.35 185,708.43745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 80,017.81 73,509.52 6,508.29 80,017.81760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 9,500.00 0.00 9,500.00 9,500.00

3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Expense Totals 355,226.25 355,226.25 216,610.41 138,615.843. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Net Position Change 208,273.75 208,273.75 23,371.84 -184,901.91 Thursday, January 26, 2023 Page 4 of 8
46 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 3. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (40 detail records)4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 600.00 600.00 4,926.70 4,326.70850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2,249,000.00 162,811.22 -2,086,188.78 2,249,000.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 750,000.00 0.00 -750,000.00 750,000.00

4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Revenue Totals 2,999,600.00 2,999,600.00 167,737.92 -2,831,862.08Expense 220 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 0.00 0.00 18,948.48 -18,948.48600 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 375,750.00 90,903.29 284,846.71 375,750.00645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,674,000.00 51,400.78 2,622,599.22 2,674,000.00

4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Expense Totals 3,049,750.00 3,049,750.00 161,252.55 2,888,497.454. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS Net Position Change -50,150.00 -50,150.00 6,485.37 56,635.37 Thursday, January 26, 2023 Page 5 of 8
47 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 4. CAPITAL & CDBG GRANTS (169 detail records)5. WATER FUNDSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 83,000.00 83,000.00 -96,950.28 -179,950.28850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,734,000.00 0.00 -6,473,000.00 6,473,000.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 3,054,552.00 1,560,541.40 -1,494,010.60 3,054,552.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 7,500.00 0.00 -7,500.00 7,500.00

5. WATER FUNDS Revenue Totals 4,879,052.00 9,618,052.00 1,463,591.12 -8,154,460.88Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 258,545.64 258,545.64 76,779.84 181,765.80300 ENGINEERING 268,491.91 79,801.23 188,690.68 268,491.91500 WATER DISTRIBUTION EXPENSE 872,028.16 261,185.13 610,843.03 872,028.16510 WATER TREATMENT AND CONSERVATION 860,333.82 388,562.28 471,771.54 860,333.82510 COST OF POWER AND WATER 289,000.00 129,835.25 159,164.75 289,000.00645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,286,335.00 2,838,701.48 4,467,633.52 7,306,335.00690 CAPITALIZATION OF ASSETS 0.00 196,533.56 -196,533.56 0.00740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 221,170.83 221,170.83 0.00 221,170.83745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 128,067.34 -29,523.46 157,590.80 128,067.34760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 375,000.00 0.00 375,000.00 375,000.00799 ICA EXPENSE 229,267.00 95,000.00 134,267.00 229,267.00

5. WATER FUNDS Expense Totals 5,788,239.70 10,808,239.70 4,036,875.31 6,771,364.395. WATER FUNDS Net Position Change -909,187.70 -1,190,187.70 -2,573,284.19 -1,383,096.49 Thursday, January 26, 2023 Page 6 of 8
48 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 5. WATER FUNDS (309 detail records)6. SEWER FUNDSRevenue 830 REVENUE - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 35,395.00 35,395.00 -53,802.81 -89,197.81850 REVENUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL 5,000,000.00 0.00 -5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00870 REVENUE - USER FEES AND CHARGES 2,904,574.00 1,193,613.43 -1,710,960.57 2,904,574.00882 REVENUE - OTHER 3,300,000.00 0.00 -3,300,000.00 3,300,000.00898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 2,000.00 0.00 -2,000.00 2,000.00

6. SEWER FUNDS Revenue Totals 11,241,969.00 11,241,969.00 1,139,810.62 -10,102,158.38Expense 100 COLLECTION EXPENSE 247,545.64 247,545.64 74,453.52 173,092.12300 ENGINEERING 231,491.91 66,736.57 164,755.34 231,491.91510 COST OF POWER AND WATER 221,000.00 72,269.87 148,730.13 221,000.00550 WASTEWATER COLLECTION EXPENSE 589,801.84 85,503.86 504,297.98 589,801.84560 WASTEWATER TREATMENT EXPENSE 868,957.58 325,500.32 734,857.26 1,060,357.58645 CAPITAL OUTLAY 8,936,803.00 567,676.64 8,369,126.36 8,936,803.00690 CAPITALIZATION OF ASSETS 0.00 0.00 241,992.80 -241,992.80740 PRINCIPAL ON LT DEBT 88,000.00 0.00 88,000.00 88,000.00745 INTEREST ON LT DEBT 228,855.00 -1,168.75 230,023.75 228,855.00760 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 375,000.00 0.00 375,000.00 375,000.00799 ICA EXPENSE 216,530.00 90,000.00 126,530.00 216,530.00

6. SEWER FUNDS Expense Totals 12,003,984.97 12,195,384.97 1,522,964.83 10,672,420.146. SEWER FUNDS Net Position Change -762,015.97 -953,415.97 -383,154.21 570,261.76 Thursday, January 26, 2023 Page 7 of 8
49 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Adopted Bdgt Current Period Favorable or (Unfavorable)
Revised Operating
Bdgt
Summary for 'Auditor Fund' = 6. SEWER FUNDS (243 detail records) Grand Total 1,896,277.78 1,919,061.28 2,800,068.14 881,006.86 Thursday, January 26, 2023 Page 8 of 8
50 CITY OF YREKA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
To: Yreka City Council
Prepared by: Emily Aldrich, Finance Director
Agenda title: Approval of the City of Yreka Budget Calendar for FY 2023-2024 and 2024-2025
Meeting date: February 7, 2023
Discussion:

The City of Yreka migrated to a two-year budget cycle in 2014-15 to 2015-2016. Finance has commenced preparation of the next biannual budget cycle for fiscal years 2023-24 and 2024-25.

The process of preparing a budget includes looking at the current fiscal year 2022-23 and assessing changes needed based on revenue and expense trends, personnel, and projects to forecast the anticipated budget.

Finance works closely with the City Manager and Department Heads to assess the status of the many multi-year life cycle construction projects to determine the financial (and cash flow) needs of the City.

A draft budget will be presented to the Finance Committee for their review and input, and full City Council workshops are planned as we progress.

Fiscal Impact:

None
Recommendation and Requested Action:

Approval of the City of Yreka Budget Calendar for Fiscal Years 2023-2024 and 2024- 2025.
51 2/1/2023
City of Yreka – Budget Calendar
Review of 2022-2023 Budget
Prepare 2023-2024 & 2024-2025 Biannual Budget
Proposed Calendar Activities Steps
Now -January 31, 2023 (Finance) • Prepare and distribute Dept head budget’s workpapers revisions for
2022-23 and projections for 2023-
24 – 2024-25.
• Process detailed line-item reports for
distribution to Dept Heads, follow up
weekly with explanations of current
expenses made, update of multiple lines
as changes are needed.
• Update expenses for Finance, Legal,
City Council, IT, Community Services,
Theater/Center
• Trend and update all utilities (water,
power, communications, alarm
maintenance, trash, propane) for all
departments.
• Revenue trends, Sales Tax, Property
Tax, TOT, Franchise Fees,
Building/Planning(with JL), Investment
earnings, Fees & Charges,
• Long Term Debt
• Capital Assets, based on replacement
schedule and prior year changes in.

January 16, 2023 (Depart. Heads)
January 19, 2023 (Finance Committee)
• Discussion and or approval of
budget calendar and schedule
council dates
• Position control update, COLA, MOU
updates, insurance (health, dental,
vision, workmans comp), taxes, and
step increases
• Distribution of Employee Costs as a
percentage across cost centers,
aggregation of cost center distribution
and cross check internal balancing
52 2/1/2023
controls for wage and benefit related
expenses
March 6, 2023 – April 7, 2023 • Finance meets with Manager for Mid-year review (2022-23) and
discusses 2023-24, 24-25 budgets
w/ Dept Heads
• Calculate and update necessary
interfund transfers for balancing.
• Review trend lines of budget data to
see if department is meeting its
budgetary controls.
• Update budget for changes approved
through legislation actions
• Update capital projects schedule
distribution over fiscal years, estimate
% completion in $’s for budget
projections.
•
March 6, 2023 – April 30, 2023 • Finance to prepares mid-year budget revisions 2022-2023.
• Finance aggregates departmental
budget input for City
• Finalize input and signoff from DH,
that all changes agreements have been
input
May 1 – May 15, 2023 (Internal) • CM and Finance to summarize projected shortfalls to City council
• Finalize #’s, revenue trends, new
insurance rates, incorporate the
governor’s revised budget
• CM and Finance to work with
Dept Heads on potential revisions.
• Review Governor’s revised budget for
impacts
• Incorporate final changes, based on
feedback of final drafts.
•
May 15- May 31, 2023 • Finance to release to dept heads for review draft budgets.
• Finance Committee meets to
discuss projections.
• Update PPP, for presentation, with
updated narrative.
•
June 6, 2023 (City Council) • Department Heads and Finance present budget (includes projected
revenues, position control
expenditures, and expenditure
•
53 2/1/2023
trends) to City Council
(PowerPoint).

June 6-20, 2023 (Finance) • Finalize budget documents for consideration by public and
Council
• Resolution for adoption
June 20, 2023 • Budget available for public
inspection
• Schedule additional special budget
meetings if needed
•
July 11, 2023 (City Council) • Present 2023-24, 2024-25 Proposed Budget for adoption.
•
September 2023(Finance and City Manager) • Prepare newsletter budget article • 54 BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA

AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: February 7, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dohn Henion, Yreka City Attorney
TITLE: RESOLUTION TO CONTINUE HOLDING PUBLIC MEETINGS REMOTELY (AB 361) RECOMMENDATION:

In accordance with Assembly Bill 361, adopt a resolution to continue conducting the City’s Council, Commission, and Committee meetings remotely due to health and safety concerns to the public due to COVID-19.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

BACKGROUND:

On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a State of Emergency to make additional resources available, formalize emergency actions already underway across multiple state agencies and departments, and help the state prepare for a broader spread of COVID-19.

Thereafter, on March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-2920, which suspended certain provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act to allow local legislative bodies to conduct meetings telephonically or by other means. Additionally, the State implemented a shelter-in-place order, requiring all non-essential personnel to work from home.

Staff quickly worked to set up remote meetings via Zoom for all City Council and Planning Commission meetings. The Zoom meetings have allowed the Council, Commissions, and Committees to continue to conduct City business from the safety of members’ homes. The City has been utilizing Zoom for the past 18 months to conduct nearly all public meetings. The usage of Zoom for public meetings has allowed the City to ensure the public’s continued access to government meetings while also ensuring the public’s safety.

On June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21, which extended the ability of agencies to hold remote meetings through September 30, 2021, after which agencies anticipated transitioning back to public meetings held in full compliance with the Brown Act. In preparation for the return to in-person meetings, staff has been working on acquiring audio and visual upgrades for City facilities to conduct hybrid meetings. Although hybrid meetings would help to keep the public safe by allowing them to continue accessing the meetings from their own home, Councilmembers, Commissioners, Committee members, and staff would need to meet in person.
55 Since the Governor issued Executive Order N-08-21, the Delta variant has emerged, causing a spike in cases throughout the state.

On September 16, 2021, Governor Newson signed Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361), which allows cities to continue to meet remotely during proclaimed states of emergency under modified Brown Act requirements that are similar but not identical to the rules and procedures established by the previous Executive Orders.

AB 361 authorizes local agencies to use teleconferencing without complying with the teleconferencing requirements imposed by the Ralph M. Brown Act during a declared state of emergency, when state or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing during the proclaimed state of emergency, or when there is an imminent risk to the health or safety of attendees.

DISCUSSION:

AB 361 will allow local legislative bodies to continue to meet remotely after the September 30, 2021 expiration of the Governor’s executive orders. A local agency will be allowed to continue to meet remotely when:
• The local agency holds a meeting during a declared state of emergency • State or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing
• Legislative bodies declare the need to meet remotely due to present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees
The City meets the requirements to continue holding meetings remotely to ensure the health and safety of the public due to the following:
• The City is still under a local state of emergency;
• County health orders require that all individuals in public spaces maintain social distancing and wear masks;
• The City can’t maintain social distancing requirements for the public, staff, Councilmembers, Commissioners, and Committee Members in their meeting spaces; The City cannot ensure social distancing requirements are met inside City facilities where the City Council, Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Redistricting Advisory Committee, Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, and Main Street Bridge Advisory Committee meet.

Moreover, the indoor mask order is still in effect, making it difficult to hear what Councilmembers, Commissioners, Committee Members, staff, and public speakers are saying.

Furthermore, while speaking through masks may be understandable in person, picking up speech on microphones for those attending remotely and those watching any livestreams would be difficult.
56 Per AB 361, the City Council would need to declare every 30 days that the City’s legislative bodies must continue to meet remotely to ensure the health and safety of the public. Staff recommends that the City Council declare these findings are true so these bodies can continue to meet remotely. Staff will return with this resolution for re-ratification at the Council’s 1st Tuesday meeting each month, at which time the Council can reassess as various health orders and COVID-19 parameters change.
57 RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 51
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 A RESOLUTION OF THE YREKA CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

YREKA PROCLAIMING A LOCAL EMERGENCY, RATIFYING THE

PROCLAMATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY BY GOVERNOR
NEWSOM ON MARCH 4, 2020, AND AUTHORIZING REMOTE

TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF
CITY OF YREKA FOR THE PERIOD SUCCESSIVE 30-DAY PERIODS
PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361
9 WHEREAS, the City of Yreka is committed to preserving and nurturing IO public access and participation in meetings of the Yreka City Council; and 11 WHEREAS, all meetings of City of Yreka's legislative bodies are open and 12 public, as required by t.he Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code§ 54950 13 54963), so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the 14 City's legislative bodies conduct their business; and 15 16 WHEREAS, the Brown Act, Government Code section 54953(e), makes 17 provisions for remote teleconferencing paiiicipation in meetings by members of 18 a legislative body, without compliance with the requirements of Government 19 Code section 54953(b )(3), subject to the existence of certain conditions; and 20 WHEREAS, a required condition is that a state of emergency is declared by the 21 Governor pursuant to Government Code section 8625, proclaiming the existence 22 of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property 23 within the state caused by conditions as described in Government Code section 24 8558;and
25 WHEREAS, a proclamation is made when there is an actual incident, threat of 26 disaster, or extreme peril to the safety of persons and prope1iy within the 27 jurisdictions that are within the City's boundaries, caused by natural, 28 technological, or human-caused disasters; and
29 WHEREAS, it is further required that state or local officials have imposed or 30 recommended measures to promote social distancing, or, the legislative body 58 31 meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of 32 attendees; and
33 WHEREAS, such conditions now exist in the City, specifically, in Executive Order 34 N-29-20 the Governor of the State of California declared a state of emergency to 35 exist as a result of the threat of COVID-19; and
36 WHEREAS, said order suspended provisions of celiain provisions of the Brown 37 Act relating to teleconference meetings and creating the ability for viliual meetings 38 to keep the public and our public officials safer from exposure to the pandemic; and 39 WHEREAS, that suspension of the Brown Act requires expired on September 30, 40 2021; and
41 WHEREAS, On September 16,2021 Assembly Bill 361 was passed into law 42 permitting the extension of virtual meetings so long as the state of emergency 43 exists and is reviewed every thirty days by the Yreka City Council; and 44 WHEREAS, the delta variant of COVID-19 has resulted in Siskiyou County 45 having experienced 4,382 confirmed COVID-19 amongst the local population 46 cases, 54 deaths, 56 new cases reported in the last 24 hours with 271 active cases 47 and 23 persons presently hospitalized and, accordingly, social distancing and 48 masking is required for attendees' health and safety to mitigate the imminent risk 49 of COVID-19 being transmissible during public, in-person meetings of the City of 50 Yreka; and
51 WHEREAS, virtual meetings further mitigate the public's health and safety while 52 still providing the opportunity for public input on the people's business; and 53 WHEREAS, the City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of 54 emergency; and
55 WHEREAS, the state of local emergency continues to directly impact the ability of 56 the City Council, Commissions, and Committees, as well as staff and members of 57 the public, from meeting safely in person; and
58 WHEREAS, the Yreka City Council does hereby find that prevalence of COVID-19 59 amongst the local population and, accordingly, social distancing and masking is 2 59
60 required for attendees health and safety to mitigate the imminent risk of COVID-19 61 being transmissible during public, in-person meetings of the City of Yreka, its 62 commissions and committees may cause, and may continue to cause, conditions of 63 peril to the safety of persons within the City that are likely to be beyond the control of 64 services, persOlmel, equipment, and facilities of the City, healthcare providers and 65 local hospitals, and desires to proclaim a local emergency and ratify the 66 proclamation of state of emergency by the Governor of the State of California; and 67 68 WHEREAS, as a consequence of the local emergency, the Yreka City Council 69 does hereby find that the City of Yreka's governing body, its commissions and 70 committees shall conduct their meetings without compliance with paragraph (3) of 71 subdivision (b) of Government Code section 54953, as authorized by subdivision 72 (e) of section 54953, and that such legislative bodies shall comply with the 73 requirements to provide the public with access to the meetings as prescribed in 74 paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of section 54953; and 75 WHEREAS, meetings are posted on the City's website providing the necessary 76 information for the public to virtually provide input to the governing body on the 77 people's business.
78 NOW, THEREFORE, THE YREKA CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 79 YREKA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
80 Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are 81 incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. 82 Section 2. Proclamation of Local Emergency. The City Council hereby proclaims 83 that a local emergency now exists throughout the City, and prevalence of COVID84 19 amongst the local population and, accordingly, social distancing and masking is 85 required for attendees health and safety to mitigate the imminent risk of COVID-19 86 being transmissible during public, in-person meetings of the City of Yreka has 87 caused, and will continue to cause, conditions of peril to the safety of persons within 88 the City that are likely to be beyond the control of services, personnel, equipment, and 89 facilities of the City, healthcare providers and local hospitals. 3 60
90 Section 3. Ratification of Governor's Proclamation ofa State of Emergency. The 91 City Council hereby ratifies the Governor of the State of California's Proclamation 92 of State of Emergency, effective as of its issuance date of March 4, 2021. 93 Section 4. Remote Teleconference Meetings. The staff and legislative bodies of 94 City of Yreka are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to 95 cany out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, conducting open and 96 public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and other 97 applicable provisions of the Brown Act.
98 Section 5. Effective Date of Resolution. This Resolution shall take effect 99 immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective until the earlier of (i) 30 days 100 from adoption of resolution, and 30 days from each successive affirmation that the 101 state of emergency continues to exist or such time the Yreka City Council adopts a 102 subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953( e)(3) to 103 extend the time during which the governing body of the City of Yreka may continue 104 to teleconference without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of 105 section 54953.
106 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Yreka City Council of the City of Yreka, this 5th 107 day of October, 2021, by the following vote:
108 AYES: FREEMAN, MIDDLETON, BAIRD, KEGG
109 NOES:
110 ABSENT: MCCOY
111 ABSTAIN:
112
113 DuaneK
114 Attest:
115
116
4 61

CITY OF YREKA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
To:

Prepared By:

Agenda Title:

Meeting date:

Yreka City Council
City Clerk
Discussion/Possible Action: Continuation of Urgency Ordinance 864.

February 7, 2023
Discussion:

The drought, prevailing climatic temperatures, and the allocation of Yreka Fire Resources to mutual aid to suppress wildfires was found to constitute an immediate threat to the public safety.

Ordinance 864 delays the sale of fireworks and the use of fireworks and public displays of pyrotechnics until the threat to public safety is abated.

Recommendation:

That the Council continue Urgency Ordinance 864.
62 SUMMARY OF ADOPTED URGENCY ORDINANCE No. 864
Please take notice that the Yreka City Council adopted, at an emergency meeting held on July 29, 2021, a temporary urgency ordinance, number 864, entitled: “AN UNCODIFIED URGENCY

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF YREKA DECLARING A LOCAL EMERGENCY, AND AUTHORIZING THE

DELAY OF THE SALE AND USE OF FIREWORKS WHICH MAY CREATE A THREAT TO PUBLIC SAFETY

DEEMED TO BE ARISING FROM THE INCIDENCE OF THE LAVA FIRE AND SETTING FORTH THE FACTS CONSTITUTING SUCH URGENCY AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE EXEMPT FROM CEQA REVIEW” This urgency ordinance generally provides:

1. The factual background of the Lava Fire, the drought, the prevailing climatic temperatures and the fact that Yreka’s Fire Resources are engaged in mutual aid to suppress the Lava Fire as well as the allocation of law enforcement resources in traffic control and the fact that without Yreka’s normally available police and fire resources, the use of fireworks and pyrotechnics fire may not be able to be suppressed which was found to constitute the basis for the urgency nature of the ordinance and the City Council determined that there existed an immediate threat to the public health, safety and/or welfare and a need for immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety that warrants the adopted urgency measures.

2. The ordinance delays the sale of fireworks and the use of fireworks and public displays of pyrotechnics until the threat to public safety is abated and the urgency ordinance is terminated.

3. The city council determined that a local emergency now exists and shall continue to exist until its termination is ordained by the City Council. The need for continuance of the urgency measures will be regularly reviewed by City Council until it is terminated. The ordinance will be terminated at the earliest possible time.

4. The ordinance vests in the City Manager, Chief of Police and the Fire Chief with the discretion to take such acts as may be necessary to effectuate the intent of the ordinance.

5. The Council determined that the ordinance complies with a categorical exemption from CEQA review.

By roll call vote the following councilmembers voted in favor of the ordinance: Duane Kegg, Deborah Baird, Paul McCoy and Corey Middleton.

This summary is not intended to be a comprehensive statement of all of the provisions of the Ordinance, but constitutes only a fair summary of the Ordinance. The complete text of the Ordinance and the minutes of the emergency session is available for review online in Yreka’s City Council Agenda section or through a public records request as an in-person review of it is not available because City Hall is not currently open to the public.

Yreka City Clerk
63

Page 1 of 2 ends

CITY OF YREKA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM
To: Yreka City Council
From: Jason Ledbetter, City Manager
Prepared by: Rhetta Hogan, Assistant City Manager & John Elsnab, Human Resources Director
Agenda title: Requested action – Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka approving execution of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Yreka and the United Public Employees of California LiUNA Local 792 (UPEC) for the Management Employees Unit (YMEU) Meeting date: February 7, 2023
Discussion:

Staff has been negotiating with the United Public Employees of California LiUNA Local 792 (UPEC) for the Management Employees Unit (YMEU) to reach a Memorandum of Understanding.

The parties agreed on a twenty-nine term that addresses employee compensation, and health benefits as follows:

Term Twenty-nine-month term
Wages 4% cost of living adjustment effective the first full pay period in February 2023 and a 2% cost of living adjustment effective the first full pay period in January 2024.

Salary Schedule A new top step was added to the salary schedule and the bottom two steps were removed resulting in a five (5) step salary schedule.

Medical Premium The City’s medical cap benefit will increase in plan years 2023, 2024, and 2025. The medical cap benefits are equivalent to the cost of 85% of Pers Gold in year one along with an annual increase to the benefit cap for plan year 2024 and 2025.

Standby Pay Employees receive standby pay for being assigned to standby on holidays, weekends, and for daily coverage outside of scheduled work hours
Remote Pay Employees who can perform work remotely (including SCADA calls) will be paid a minimum of thirty (30) minutes at their overtime rate per incident or actual time worked.

Medical Opt-Out Employees currently opting out of medical insurance continue to receive an opt-out payment at descending rate through December 2027. Effective January 1, 2028, the opt-out payment is eliminated.

Deferred
Compensation Match
The City’s annual employer cap of $1,500 per calendar year will increase to $1,750 per year in 2023 and $2,000 per year in 2024. 64 Estimated Fiscal Impact in dollars:

The fiscal impact is approximately $151,226 Year One, $184,162 Year Two, and $92,993 for the final six months of the contract.

Recommendation:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka approving execution of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Yreka and the United Public Employees of California LiUNA Local 792 (UPEC) for the Management Employees Unit (YMEU). 65 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-04

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA

APPROVING EXECUTION OF THE MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF YREKA AND THE UNITED
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES OF CALIFORNIA LIUNA LOCAL 792 FOR THE

MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES UNIT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Yreka, a municipal corporation, pursuant to California Government Code Section 3500, et seq., enacted an Employer-Employee Relations policy with its adoption of Resolution No. 2017-10; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager and representatives of the City, and representatives for the United Public Employees of California LiUNA Local 792 for the Management Employees Unit have met and conferred in good faith; and, WHEREAS, these parties have reached tentative agreement as of January 5, 2023, on matters relating to the employment conditions of said employees as reflected by the written Memorandum of Understanding for the United Public Employees of California LiUNA Local 792 for the Management Employees Unit all of which the City Council has reviewed; and;
WHEREAS, this Council finds that the provisions and agreements contained in the Memorandum of Understanding are fair and proper and in the best interests of the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YREKA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Council hereby finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct.

Section 2. The Memorandum of Understanding is hereby approved, and the City Manager or designee is hereby authorized and directed to execute said document, with such changes, insertions and omissions as may be approved by the City Manager.

Section 3. The City Manager, the Finance Director, and all other proper officers and officials of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such other agreements, documents and certificates, and to perform such other acts and deeds, as may be necessary or convenient to effect the purposes of this Resolution and the transactions herein authorized.

Section 4. It is further resolved, If any section, subsection, part, clause, sentence or phrase of this Resolution or the application thereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution, the application thereof, shall not be effected thereby but shall remain in full force and effect, it being the intention of the City Council to adopt 66 each and every section, subsection, part, clause, sentence phrase regardless of whether any other section, subsection, part, clause, sentence or phrase or the application thereof is held to be invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

Passed and adopted this 7th day of February 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________
Corey Middleton
Mayor
Attest:
_____________________
Rhetta Hogan
City Clerk
67 Memorandum of Understanding
between the
City of Yreka
and
United Public Employees of California,
LiUNA Local 792
February 5, 2023, through July 5, 2025
DocuSign Envelope ID: B970AECF-CE46-4817-B016-5B72AC946F2C 68 City of Yreka i UPEC
Table of Contents
Article 1 - Preamble......................................................................................................... 1 Article 2 - Recognition ..................................................................................................... 1 Article 3 - Union Rights.................................................................................................... 1

3.1 Dues.................................................................................................................................. 1

3.2 New Employee Orientation.............................................................................................. 1

3.3 Notice of Meet and Confer............................................................................................... 2 Article 4 - Salary.............................................................................................................. 2

4.1 Salary Schedule ................................................................................................................ 2

4.2 Salary Increases................................................................................................................ 2

4.3 Equity Adjustments.......................................................................................................... 2

4.4 Overtime (non-exempt employees).................................................................................. 2

4.5 Callback Pay..................................................................................................................... 2

4.6 Remote Pay ...................................................................................................................... 3

4.7 Standby Pay...................................................................................................................... 3 Article 5 - Insurances....................................................................................................... 3

5.1 Medical and Dental Insurance.......................................................................................... 3

5.2 Medical Opt-Out .............................................................................................................. 4

5.3 Vision Insurance............................................................................................................... 4

5.4 Life Insurance................................................................................................................... 5 Article 6 - Retirement....................................................................................................... 5

6.1 Miscellaneous Retirement................................................................................................ 5 Article 7 - Deferred Compensation .................................................................................. 5 Article 8 - Allowances...................................................................................................... 5

8.1 Boot Allowance................................................................................................................ 5 Article 9 - Leaves ............................................................................................................ 6

9.1 Vacation ........................................................................................................................... 6

9.2 Holidays ........................................................................................................................... 6

9.3 Floating Holidays:............................................................................................................ 7

9.4 Administrative Leave ....................................................................................................... 7

9.5 Sick Leave ........................................................................................................................ 7

9.6 Bereavement Leave .......................................................................................................... 7 Article 10 - Concerted Activities ...................................................................................... 7 Article 11 - Term.............................................................................................................. 8 Appendix "A" Recognition ............................................................................................... 9 Appendix "B" Salary Schedule ...................................................................................... 10 DocuSign Envelope ID: B970AECF-CE46-4817-B016-5B72AC946F2C 69 City of Yreka 1 UPEC
ARTICLE 1 - PREAMBLE
This Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Yreka (City) and United Public Employees of California LiUNA Local 792 (UPEC) for the Yreka Management Employees Unit (YMEU) has as its purpose the promotion of harmonious labor relations between the City and UPEC and the establishment of rates of pay, hours of work, and other conditions of employment.

ARTICLE 2 - RECOGNITION
The City recognizes UPEC as the sole and exclusive representative for full-time employees in the classifications listed in Appendix "A" Recognition, as amended.

ARTICLE 3 - UNION RIGHTS

3.1 Dues
Upon certification from UPEC that an employee has signed an authorization for the deduction of dues, the City shall make payroll deductions in an amount to be determined by UPEC and communicated to the City annually. The City shall promptly remit deductions to UPEC with a list of dues-paying members. The City will transmit payment to UPEC through Electronic Funds Transfers (EFT). Employee requests to cancel membership dues deductions must be directed to UPEC. Upon notification from UPEC that an employee has canceled membership dues, the City will promptly cease dues deductions from the employee's paycheck. The City may only request a copy of a dues authorization in case of a dispute. UPEC will hold the City harmless from all claims and will indemnify it against any unreasonable costs in implementing this provision, and shall indemnify the City for any claims made by the employee for deductions made in reliance on that certification, in accordance with Government Code §1157.12(a).

3.2 New Employee Orientation
New employee orientation shall occur within thirty (30) days of an employee's hire. UPEC shall be provided not less than ten (10) days advance notice of any new employee orientation session unless otherwise agreed to in writing (e.g., email). The City shall allow two (2) representatives to address the employees being oriented for up to thirty (30) minutes. The employee representatives conducting orientation shall be granted paid release time, including reasonable travel time if needed.

Management representatives will excuse themselves during UPEC's orientation portion unless otherwise agreed. UPEC agrees not to engage in speech that could cause substantial disruption or material interference with City activities.

The parties acknowledge that this Agreement fully complies with and exhausts the parties' obligation to negotiate pursuant to Government Code Section 3557. Due to such agreement, compulsory arbitration pursuant to Government Code Section 3557 is waived for as long as this Agreement is in effect.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B970AECF-CE46-4817-B016-5B72AC946F2C 70 City of Yreka 2 UPEC

3.3 Notice of Meet and Confer
The City will notify UPEC regarding changes in job classifications or policies that fall within the scope of representation under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA). UPEC has fifteen (15) days to request a meet and confer. Two (2) employees may be on paid release time while attending meetings with the City during the meet and confer process.

ARTICLE 4 - SALARY

4.1 Salary Schedule
The salary schedule consists of five (5) steps, with five percent (5.0%) between steps (1) through (5). The salary schedule is attached as Appendix "B" Salary Schedule.

Employees advance steps upon completion of a satisfactory performance evaluation.

4.2 Salary Increases
Effective February 5, 2023, all classifications receive a four percent (4%) increase.

Effective January 7, 2024, all classifications receive a two percent (2%) increase.

4.3 Equity Adjustments
Effective February 5, 2023, the Municipal Projects Manager will be moved to Range 2144.

4.4 Overtime (non-exempt employees)
The City has the right to assign and schedule overtime. The assignment of overtime to employees does not constitute a change in shift, work schedule, or days and hours of employment.
"Overtime" is defined as work over forty (40) hours per workweek; only actual hours worked and vacation leave count towards the calculation of overtime. Overtime is paid at one-and-a-half (1.5) times the employee's regular rate of pay. Compensation is either by payment or Compensatory Time Off (CTO) at the employee's option, except when responding to an OES or mutual aid event or when reimbursed by an intergovernmental grant. Employees may accrue a maximum of one hundred and twenty (120) hours of CTO. Employees may cash out CTO during the year it was accrued; any CTO remaining will be paid out on the final paycheck in December.

4.5 Callback Pay
An employee who is called back to work receives a minimum of two (2) hours at their overtime rate or, if the hours are contiguous to their normal work shift, the actual hours worked at the applicable rate of pay.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B970AECF-CE46-4817-B016-5B72AC946F2C 71 City of Yreka 3 UPEC

4.6 Remote Pay
Employees who can perform work remotely (including SCADA calls) will be paid a minimum of thirty (30) minutes at their overtime rate per incident or actual time worked, whichever is greater.

4.7 Standby Pay
Employees assigned to standby will receive full standby pay on weekends or holidays if the employee's regularly scheduled work hours on that day are 4 hours or less. Standby pay is paid at the rate of $70.00 per full 24-hour standby period (non-holiday weekend day), $35.00 for less than a 24-hour standby period (non-holiday weekday), and $140.00 per holiday day.

Observed holidays for standby include holidays defined in section 9.2 and the actual day of the holiday, should it fall on a weekend, for the following holidays: January 1st, July 4th, November 11th, December 24th, and December 25th.

ARTICLE 5 - INSURANCES

5.1 Medical and Dental Insurance
The City contracts for employees, dependents, retirees, and dependents medical insurance benefit plans through the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) Public Employees Medical and Hospital Care Program (PEMHCA). Employee deductions are "pre-tax."
Effective plan year 2023, the City contributes up to the following amounts towards medical benefits and cafeteria plan benefits:

Tier Medical Benefit Cafeteria Plan Benefit Total Benefit Employee only Note 1 Note 2 Note 3
Employee plus one Note 1 Note 2 Note 4
Employee plus family Note 1 Note 2 Note 5
Note 1: The Medical Benefit equals the PEMHCA minimum employer contribution established annually by CalPERS.

Note 2: Cafeteria Plan Benefit is equal to the difference between the Medical Benefit and the Total Benefit.

Note 3: The total benefit equals $701.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 4: The total benefit equals $1,404.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 5: The total benefit equals $1,825.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B970AECF-CE46-4817-B016-5B72AC946F2C 72 City of Yreka 4 UPEC
Effective plan year 2024, the City contributes up to the following amounts towards employee medical insurance coverage and cafeteria plan benefits:

Note 1: The Medical Benefit equals the PEMHCA minimum employer contribution established annually by CalPERS.

Note 2: Cafeteria Plan Benefit is equal to the difference between the Medical Benefit and the Total Benefit.

Note 3: The total benefit equals $758.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 4: The total benefit equals $1,516.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 5: The total benefit equals $1,971.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Effective plan year 2025, the City contributes up to the following amounts towards employee medical insurance coverage and cafeteria plan benefits:

Note 1: The Medical Benefit equals the PEMHCA minimum employer contribution established annually by CalPERS.

Note 2: Cafeteria Plan Benefit is equal to the difference between the Medical Benefit and the Total Benefit.

Note 3: The total benefit equals $819.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 4: The total benefit equals $1,637.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

Note 5: The total benefit equals $2,128.00 plus 100% of the dental premium.

5.2 Medical Opt-Out
An employee who is currently opting out as of December 31, 2022, and continuously elects to opt-out of City offered health insurance is eligible for an opt-out payment of $230.77 per paycheck. Effective January 1, 2024, the opt-out payment is $184.62 per paycheck. Effective January 1, 2025, the opt-out payment is $138.46 per paycheck.

Effective January 1, 2026, the opt-out payment is $92.31 per paycheck. Effective January 1, 2027, the opt-out payment is $46.15 per paycheck. Effective January 1, 2028, the optout is eliminated. An employee opting out may accept medical insurance but is no longer eligible to receive the opt-out payment in the future. An employee receiving insurance through the City may not receive the opt-out payment. The opt-out payment is taxable income.

5.3 Vision Insurance
The City provides vision plan B through the California Vision Service Plan (VSP) for employees and their dependents. The City retains the right to self-insure at the same benefit level.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B970AECF-CE46-4817-B016-5B72AC946F2C 73 City of Yreka 5 UPEC

5.4 Life Insurance
The City provides employees with life insurance equal to double their annual base salary and one thousand dollars ($1,000) per dependent.

ARTICLE 6 - RETIREMENT

6.1 Miscellaneous Retirement
Employees hired after June 30, 1974, who are not classified as a new members receive the 2% at 55 miscellaneous CalPERS formula (1084) with the three (3) year final average compensation period. These employees pay the required seven percent (7%) member contribution on a pre-tax basis.

Employees hired after December 31, 2012, who are classified as a new members receive the 2% at 62 miscellaneous CalPERS formula (26550) with the three (3) year final average compensation period. These employees pay one-half of the total normal cost as determined annually by CalPERS on a pre-tax basis.

Miscellaneous retirement formulas have the following optional CalPERS retirement benefits:
 Military Service Credit
 Sick Leave Service Credit
 2% Retirement COLA
ARTICLE 7 - DEFERRED COMPENSATION
The City matches one dollar ($1.00) for every two dollars ($2.00) contributed by the employee into their deferred compensation account. The maximum City match is $1,750 annually. Effective January 7, 2024, the maximum City match is $2,000 annually. The City's contribution is deposited into the employee's 457 plan.

ARTICLE 8 - ALLOWANCES

8.1 Boot Allowance
Public Works employees working in the field receive a reimbursement of four hundred dollars ($400.00) upon hire and annually after that for the purchase and maintenance of work boots.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B970AECF-CE46-4817-B016-5B72AC946F2C 74 City of Yreka 6 UPEC
ARTICLE 9 - LEAVES

9.1 Vacation
Employees accrue vacation as follows:

Months of Employment Accrual Per Pay Period Maximum Accrual Limit 0 – 60 months 3.08 hours 160 hours
61 – 180 months 4.62 hours 240 hours
181 months and after 6.15 hours 320 hours
Employees cease to accrue vacation once their maximum accrual limit has been reached until accrued vacation is reduced below their maximum accrual limit.

Part-time employees, who become full-time employees without separation of service, are credited for part-time service to compute months of employment for their vacation accrual rate. One hundred seventy-three (173) hours of part-time service equals one (1) month of employment.

9.2 Holidays
The City recognizes the following holidays:

Holiday Date Holiday Day Observed
July 4th Independence Day
First Monday in September Labor Day
November 11th Veteran's Day
Last Thursday in November Thanksgiving Day
Friday Following Thanksgiving Day After Thanksgiving Day December 24th Christmas Eve
December 25th Christmas Day
January 1st New Year's Day
Third Monday in January Martin Luther King Day
Third Monday in February President's Day
Last Monday in May Memorial Day
When a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday is observed as the holiday. When a holiday falls on a Saturday, the preceding Friday is observed as the holiday. When December 24th falls on a Friday, December 23rd is observed as the holiday. When December 25th falls on a Monday, December 26th is observed as the holiday.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B970AECF-CE46-4817-B016-5B72AC946F2C 75 City of Yreka 7 UPEC

9.3 Floating Holidays:

Employees receive twenty-four (24) hours of floating holidays annually on the first full pay period in January. Floating holidays must be used or forfeited by December 31. Floating holidays for new employees are prorated as follows:

Hire Date Proration
January 1 – March 31 24 hours
April 1 – June 30 18 hours
July 1 – September 30 12 hours
October 1 – December 31 6 hours

9.4 Administrative Leave
Exempt employees receive fifty-six (56) hours of administrative leave annually on the first full pay period in January. Administrative leave must be used or forfeited by December

31. Proration of Administrative Leave for new employees Hire Date Proration
January 1 – March 31 56 hours
April 1 – June 30 42 hours
July 1 – September 30 28 hours
October 1 – December 31 14 hours

9.5 Sick Leave
Employees accrue three and sixty-nine-hundredths (3.69) hours of sick leave per pay period.

9.6 Bereavement Leave
Employees may take up to twenty-four (24) hours of bereavement leave for the death of an immediate family member. "Immediate family" is defined as the employee's: spouse, domestic partner, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, mother/father-inlaw, brother/sister-in-law, or has met the criteria for a loco parentis relationship.

ARTICLE 10 - CONCERTED ACTIVITIES
The parties acknowledge that the services performed by employees are essential to the public health, safety, and general welfare of the residents of the City of Yreka.

Accordingly, UPEC will not recommend, encourage, cause or permit its members to initiate, participate in, nor will any employee take part in any strike, sit-down, stay-in, sickout, or slow-down to affect an employer-employee relations position (work-stoppage), in DocuSign Envelope ID: B970AECF-CE46-4817-B016-5B72AC946F2C 76 City of Yreka 8 UPEC
any office or department of the City, nor curtail any work or restrict any production, or interfere with any operation of the City. Picketing is prohibited on matters involving wages, insurance coverage, and leaves from work during the term of this Agreement. In the event of a work stoppage by any employee, the City is not required to negotiate on the merits of any dispute that may have given rise to the stoppage until the stoppage has ceased.

The City agrees not to lock out employees.

In case of any work stoppage during the term of this Agreement, whether by UPEC or any employee, UPEC, through its officers, must immediately declare in writing that such work stoppage is illegal and unauthorized and further direct its members in writing to cease the conduct and resume work. Copies of the written notice will be provided to the City. In the event of any work stoppage UPEC properly and in good faith performs the obligations of the paragraph, and providing UPEC had not otherwise authorized, permitted, or encouraged the work stoppage, UPEC is not liable for any damages caused by the violation of this provision. However, the City has the right to discipline, up to and including discharge, any employee who instigates, participates in, or gives leadership to any work stoppage activity herein prohibited, and the City has the right to seek full legal redress, including damages, against any such employee.

ARTICLE 11 - TERM
This Agreement remains in full force and effect from February 5, 2023, through July 5, 2025.

Date: ___________________ Date: __________________
City of Yreka UPEC
__________________________ ___________________________
Michael W. Jarvis Ron Copeland
Chief Negotiator Labor Relations Representative
__________________________ ___________________________
John Elsnab Ben Miller
Human Resources Director
___________________________ ___________________________ Rhetta Hogan Mitch Shinar
Assistant City Manager
__________________________ ___________________________
Jason Ledbetter Roy Hathaway
City Manager
DocuSign Envelope ID: B970AECF-CE46-4817-B016-5B72AC946F2C 1/20/2023
77 City of Yreka 9 UPEC
APPENDIX "A" RECOGNITION
Confidential Management Analyst
Fleet Manager
Municipal Projects Manager*
Public Works Maintenance and Operations Manager*
Public Works Maintenance and Operations Supervisor
Staff Accountant
Wastewater Treatment Plant Manager
Water Services Manager
Classifications with an asterisk are exempt and are not eligible for overtime.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B970AECF-CE46-4817-B016-5B72AC946F2C 78 City of Yreka 10 UPEC
APPENDIX "B" SALARY SCHEDULE
For Period 2/5/2023 to 7/5/2025
YMEU Annual Salary Schedule – Effective 2/5/23 to 1/6/2024 YMEU Annual Salary Schedule – Effective 1/7/2024

JOB TITLE COLA RANGE STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STAFF ACCOUNTANT NP 1670 58,607.80 61,538.19 64,615.10 67,845.85 71,238.15 CONFIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1.04 1770 63,077.25 66,231.12 69,542.68 73,019.82 76,670.82 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR 1.04 1770 63,077.25 66,231.12 69,542.68 73,019.82 76,670.82 FLEET MANAGER 1.04 2144 76,489.97 80,314.47 84,330.20 88,546.71 92,974.05 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANAGER 1.04 2144 76,489.97 80,314.47 84,330.20 88,546.71 92,974.05 MUNICIPAL PROJECTS MANAGER 1.04 2144 76,489.97 80,314.47 84,330.20 88,546.71 92,974.05 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MANAGER 1.04 2144 76,489.97 80,314.47 84,330.20 88,546.71 92,974.05 WATER MANAGER 1.04 2144 76,489.97 80,314.47 84,330.20 88,546.71 92,974.05

JOB TITLE COLA RANGE STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STAFF ACCOUNTANT 1.02 1670 59,779.96 62,768.96 65,907.41 69,202.79 72,662.93 CONFIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1.02 1770 64,338.80 67,555.74 70,933.53 74,480.21 78,204.23 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR 1.02 1770 64,338.80 67,555.74 70,933.53 74,480.21 78,204.23 MUNICIPAL PROJECTS MANAGER 1.02 2144 78,019.77 81,920.76 86,016.80 90,317.64 94,833.53 FLEET MANAGER 1.02 2144 78,019.77 81,920.76 86,016.80 90,317.64 94,833.53 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANAGER 1.02 2144 78,019.77 81,920.76 86,016.80 90,317.64 94,833.53 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MANAGER 1.02 2144 78,019.77 81,920.76 86,016.80 90,317.64 94,833.53 WATER MANAGER 1.02 2144 78,019.77 81,920.76 86,016.80 90,317.64 94,833.53 DocuSign Envelope ID: B970AECF-CE46-4817-B016-5B72AC946F2C 79 CITY OF YREKA

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM
Prepared by: Juliana Lucchesi, AICP Planning Director
Agenda Title: 6B. Approval of Final 2023-2031 Housing Element Meeting date: February 7, 2023
Recommended Action:

Motion to adopt Resolution 2023-05 “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka Adopting the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update and Approving the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Exemption Pursuant to CEQA Section 15061(b)(3)”
Summary:

The City of Yreka has prepared the 2023-2031 Housing Element update in compliance with State Housing Element Law and contains each off the elements mandated by state law, including but not limited to, identifying adequate sites for a variety of housing types and making adequate provision for the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the City.

Background:

The Housing Element of the General Plan is a comprehensive statement by the City of Yreka of its current and future housing needs and proposed actions to facilitate the provision of housing to meet those needs at all income levels. The policies contained in this element are an expression of the statewide housing priority to allow for the “attainment of decent housing and a suitable living environment for every Californian,” as well as a reflection of the unique concerns of the community. The purpose of the Housing Element is to establish specific goals, policies, and objectives relative to the provision of housing and to adopt an action plan toward this end. In addition, the element identifies and analyzes housing needs and resources and constraints to meeting those needs.

Public Engagement:

In developing the 6th Cycle Housing Element, the City conducted the following outreach efforts:
• Public Workshop on January 26th, 2022: introduced the Housing Element and update
80 • process, reviewed recent legislation, discussed current City demographics, and gathered public input on housing needs.
• City Council Meeting on April 19, 2022: provided overview of update process and steps taken to date, discussed initial findings from needs assessment, reviewed vacant sites inventory, gathered public input and comments from the Council.
• Stakeholder Interviews: City staff met with numerous individuals from the community to gather input on what types of housing are working for the area and what types of housing are needed. Two rounds of interviews were conducted including five stakeholder interviews in April 2022 and nine interviews in July 2022. Interviews were held with housing developers, property managers, community organizations focused on housing and homelessness, realtors, Tribal housing representatives, and major employers in Yreka. Appendix F contains a list of the organizations that were interviewed and their responses.
• Coordination with the Continuum of Care network through Siskiyou County Health and Human Services to assess the needs of those experiencing homelessness. The City’s efforts include interviewing caregivers, homeless youth programming staff, and receiving input from the individuals who are homeless.
• Coordination with Karuk Housing Authority on housing needs for the tribe and identification of properties for joint housing projects between the City and Karuk Tribal Nation.
• Throughout the process the City included Housing Element update information on the General Plan update website and in newsletters on various issues related to the housing element and opportunities to provide input (https://yrekageneralplan2044.com/housing/).
• Planning Commission public hearing and draft Housing Element review on July 20, 2022. Presented Public Review Draft Housing Element update and community outreach efforts to representatives of Planning Commission, received public comments and facilitated discussion with the Planning Commission.
• City Council public hearing and draft Housing Element review on August 30, 2022. Presented Public Review Draft Housing Element update and community outreach efforts to representatives of the Council, received public comments and facilitated discussion with the Council. • City Council presentation on January 17, 2023 introduced the final draft and the changes since the August 30, 2022 based on state comments. 81 • Planning Commission presentation and approval on January 18, 2023 that introduce the final draft, accepted public comment, and the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to approve the proposed draft as presented • Open Public comment on the final draft from January 11, 2023 through February 7th. Only one public comment has been received during this period.
• City Council Housing Workshop on January 24, 2023 that presented the process for the housing update, public engagement and outreach, and collected public input.

Fiscal Impact Provided By Rhetta Hogan:

Most of the Federal and State agencies require assurances or certificates of compliance on state housing element being current. Failure to maintain an updated housing element would be reportable to Department of Water Resources, Department of Toxic Substances, California Housing and Community Development, CalFire, CalOES, CalTrans and Federal Agencies of USDA, EPA, EDA, USFS, FEMA. The City has active, pending and planned loan and grant applications with all of these agencies that total over $75,000,000. 82 Council Actions:

City Staff recommend the City Council approve the proposed draft as presented.

The information presented in the document meets state requirements and encompasses the input received by the public during this process.

Attachments:

1. Resolution 2023-05 “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yreka Adopting the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update and Approving the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Exemption Pursuant to CEQA Section 15061(b)(3)”

2. 2023-2031 Housing Element Final Draft

3. PlanWest Memo Regarding Changes to the Final Draft

4. Question and Answer Document

5. Notice of Exemption
83 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-05

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF YREKA ADOPTING THE 2023-2031 HOUSING

ELEMENT UPDATE AND APPROVING THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) EXEMPTION
PURSUANT TO CEQA SECTION 15061(b)(3)
WHEREAS, State Housing Element Law (Government Code Sections 65580 et seq.) requires that the City Council adopt a Housing Element update every eight years. The current update is referred to the 6th cycle update for the 2023-2031 planning period. The City of Yreka has undertaken the review and update of the Housing Element for the 6th cycle planning period that sets forth housing policies to facilitate the preservation and development of housing; and
WHEREAS, the City of Yreka has prepared the 2023-2031 Housing Element update in compliance with State Housing Element Law and contains each off the elements mandated by state law, including but not limited to, identifying adequate sites for a variety of housing types and making adequate provision for the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the City; and
WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 65350 et. seq., adoption of the Housing Element constitutes a General Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the City has conducted extensive community outreach over the last 12 months including community workshops and study sessions before the Planning Commission and City Council; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 65585 (b), on July 20, 2022, the City posted the draft Housing Element and requested public comment for a 30-day review period, and on September 13, 2022, after responding to public comments, the City submitted the draft Housing Element to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for its review; and
WHEREAS, on December 12, 2022, HCD issued a letter with written findings regarding the draft 2023-2031 Housing Element update. This letter states that while the draft Housing Element addresses most of the statutory requirements certain portions needed additional information in order for HCD to consider the Housing Element for certification; WHEREAS, the City has considered HCD’s recommended modifications and incorporated revisions into the draft Housing Element as needed in order to respond to HCD’s 84 specific requirements to ensure the Housing Element substantially complies with Housing Element law; and
WHEREAS, on January 12, 2023, the City published a revised draft Housing Element responding to HCD’s findings and requested public comment on the draft; and WHEREAS, on January 18, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly and properly noticed public hearing and recommended that the City Council adopt the Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2023, the City Council held a study session to review the revised draft and receive public comment; and WHEREAS, on February 7, 2023, the City Council conducted a duly and properly noticed public hearing to take public testimony and consider this Resolution regarding the proposed Housing Element, reviewed the Housing Element and all pertinent maps, documents and exhibits, including HCD’s comments, the City’s response to HCD’s comments, the staff report and all attachments, and oral and written public comments; and WHEREAS, the City as Lead Agency determined that the Housing Element update is exempt from further CEQA review pursuant to the common sense CEQA exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)) which provides that CEQA only applies only to projects that have potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Since no development or other physical change to the environment would be approved by Housing Element adoption, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Housing Element adoption may have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds the adoption of the 2023-2031 Housing Element is consistent with the City’s obligation to affirmatively further fair housing pursuant to Government Code Section 8899.50; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby finds that, based on substantial evidence in the record:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference into this action.

2. The Housing Element update is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) as Housing Element adoption will not have a significant effect on the environment.

3. The 2023-2031 Housing Element is an update of the City’s General Plan and 85 was prepared as required by and in accordance with State law (Section 65580 – 65589.8 of the California Government Code).

4. The 2023-2031 Housing Element is consistent with the Land Use element and other elements of the City’s General Plan.

5. The City Council has considered the findings made by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) included in HCD’s letter to the City of Yreka dated December 12, 2022, consistent with Government Code Section 65585(f), and as described in Attachment B to this resolution, incorporated herein, the City Council has revised the Housing Element in response to HCD findings to substantially comply with the requirements of State Housing Element Law as interpreted by HCD.

6. The Planning Director is hereby authorized to transmit the adopted 2023-2031 Housing Element to HCD for its earliest action and certification as provided by law; and is further directed and authorized to make all non-substantive changes to the Housing Element as required to make it internally consistent, or to address any non-substantive changes or amendments suggested or requested by HCD. Should HCD require substantive changes to the Housing Element adopted herein, City staff shall bring such changes or amendments back to the City Council for its further review and appropriate action.

7. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption by the City Council.

8. The Planning Director or designee is hereby directed to distribute copies of the Housing Element in the manner provided in Government Code Sections 65357 and 65589.7.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based on the findings set forth in this Resolution and the evidence contained in the record for this matter that the City of Yreka City Council hereby adopts the Notice of Exemption, attached hereto as Attachment A and incorporated herein by this reference; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based on the findings set forth in this Resolution and the evidence contained in the record for this matter, that the City of Yreka City Council hereby adopts the 2023-2031 Housing Element of the City of Yreka General Plan, attached hereto as Attachment B and incorporated herein by this reference; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Community Development Department is authorized to submit the 2023-2031 Housing Element to HCD.

Attachment A: Notice of Exemption
86 Attachment B: 2023-2031 Housing Element
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of February 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Corey R. Middleton, Mayor
ATTEST:

Rhetta Hogan, City Clerk
87 2023-2031

HOUSING ELEMENT
UPDATE
Revised Public Review Draft
January 31, 2023
Prepared by:
1125 16th Street, Suite 200
Arcata, CA 95521
88 City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft January 31 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1 – Introduction .................................................................................. 1-1 Guiding Policy .......................................................................................................................1-1 Guiding Principles.................................................................................................................1-2 Public Participation ...............................................................................................................1-2 General Plan Consistency ....................................................................................................1-5 Looking Ahead.......................................................................................................................1-5 Chapter 2 – Goals, Policies, and Programs.................................................. 2-1 Goal HE-1 ..............................................................................................................................2-1 Goal HE-2 ..............................................................................................................................2-6 Goal HE-3 ..............................................................................................................................2-10 Goal HE-4 ..............................................................................................................................2-17 Goal HE-5 ..............................................................................................................................2-18 Goal HE-6 ..............................................................................................................................2-19 Goal HE-7 ..............................................................................................................................2-21 Chapter 3 – Previous Housing Element Analysis........................................... 3-1 Appendix A – Housing Needs Assessment ..................................................................................A-1 Appendix B – Assessment of Fair Housing...................................................................................B-1 Appendix C – Inventory of Sites..................................................................................................C-1 Appendix D – Funding Resources................................................................................................D-1 Appendix E – Glossary................................................................................................................E-1 Appendix F – Stakeholder Interviews..........................................................................................F-1 89 City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 1 - 1 January 31, 2023
Chapter 01 - INTRODUCTION
The Housing Element of the General Plan is a comprehensive statement by the City of Yreka of its current and future housing needs and proposed actions to facilitate the provision of housing to meet those needs at all income levels. The policies contained in this element are an expression of the statewide housing priority to allow for the “attainment of decent housing and a suitable living environment for every Californian,” as well as a reflection of the unique concerns of the community. The purpose of the Housing Element is to establish specific goals, policies, and objectives relative to the provision of housing and to adopt an action plan toward this end. In addition, the element identifies and analyzes housing needs and resources and constraints to meeting those needs.

In an effort to ensure that adequate housing is developed to meet the needs of communities throughout the state, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) determines the housing need for regions in the state in coordination with the regions planning body known as the council of governments (COG), which then divides the regions housing need amongst the various jurisdictions. For the 6th cycle, the City of Yreka has been given a regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) of 2 housing units. This means that the City is responsible for adequately planning for 2 new units over the course of the 6th cycle (2022-2030). This is substantially less than the prior cycle which had a RHNA of 103 units as shown in Table 1. To date, only seven housing units have been developed as part of the 5th cycle.

Table 1-1
Progress in Meeting 5th Cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation 5th Cycle RHNA Progress* % of Progress Remaining
Need
Extremely Low-Income 12 0 0% 12
Very Low-Income 13 0 0% 13
Low-Income 17 0 0% 17
Moderate-Income 18 7 38.9% 11
Above Moderate- Income 43 0 0% 43
103 7 6.8% 96
* Data presented in per HCD's https://hcd.ca.gov/apr-data-dashboard-and-downloads webpage, accessed June 24, 2022

1. GUIDING POLICY
In accordance with state law, the Housing Element is to be consistent and compatible with other General Plan elements. Additionally, the Housing Element is to provide clear policy and direction for making decisions pertaining to zoning, subdivision approval, housing allocations, and capital improvements. State law (Government Code Sections 65580 through 65589) mandates the contents of the Housing Element. By law, the Housing Element must contain:
• An assessment of housing needs and an inventory of resources and constraints relevant to meeting those needs including the housing needs for special needs populations (Appendix A); • An assessment of fair housing as part of affirmatively furthering fair housing (Appendix B); 90 City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 1 - 2 January 31, 2023
• A statement of the community’s goals, quantified objectives, and policies relevant to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing (Chapter 2);
• Programs that set forth a five-year schedule of actions that the local government is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives of the Housing Element (Chapter 2); and
• An evaluation of the schedule of actions from the previous Housing Element (Chapter 3).

Even though the focus of the Housing Element will be on lower- and moderate-income households, the element must also address the housing needs and policy issues for the entire community and be consistent with the adopted policies of the rest of the General Plan. Thus, the Housing Element’s focus is to balance the desires of residents, maintain neighborhood character, utilize available public services, manage traffic, and minimize visual and other impacts of new development, while addressing the needs of low- and moderate-income households and special needs groups (such as seniors and individuals with disabilities).

2. GUIDING PRINCIPLES
The Yreka Housing Element is based on six strategic guiding principles:
1) Provide a range of housing that varies sufficiently in terms of cost, design, size, location, and tenure to meet the housing needs of all economic segments of the community at a level no greater than that which can be supported by the infrastructure.
2) Continue to promote housing for special needs groups. Special needs groups are defined in State law as the elderly; persons with disabilities, including a developmental disability; large families; farmworkers; families with female heads of households; and families and persons in need of emergency shelter. 3) Initiate all reasonable efforts to preserve, conserve, and enhance the quality of existing dwelling units and residential neighborhoods to ensure full utilization of the city’s existing housing resources for as long as physically and economically feasible.
4) Ensure that all persons, regardless of race, sex, cultural origin, age, marital status, or physical handicaps, are provided a choice of housing locations within the community. 5) Pursue public and private resources available to promote diverse housing opportunities, and particularly to assist in the creation and retention of affordable housing. 6) Pursue sustainable development and energy efficiency for new residential development and existing housing stock.

3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Public participation is an important part of developing the City’s Housing Element. The information obtained through public meetings, surveys, and stakeholder interviews provide insight to the true needs of the community. While the City’s RHNA may be low, the actual need of the community may be much greater.

Through the public participation process the City can identify what issues and obstacles people may be experiencing when trying to find housing. The inclusion of community stakeholders in the Housing Element public participation process helps ensure appropriate housing strategies are more efficiently and effectively evaluated, developed, and implemented. In an effort to involve all segments of the community, City staff and consultants developed a community outreach program including announcements on the City website, interviews, opportunity for housing element review and input at General Plan update events, Planning 91 City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 1 - 3 January 31, 2023
Commission and City Council workshops and hearings. Public participation played a critical role in the formulation and refinement of the City’s housing goals, policies, and programs.

Two rounds of interviews were conducted including five stakeholder interviews in April 2022 and nine interviews in July 2022. Interviews were held with housing developers, property managers, community organizations focused on housing and homelessness, realtors, Tribal housing representatives, and major employers in Yreka. Appendix F contains a list of the organizations that were interviewed and their responses.
• Coordination with the Continuum of Care network through Siskiyou County Health and Human Services to assess the needs of those experiencing homelessness. The City’s efforts include interviewing caregivers, homeless youth programming staff, and receiving input from the individuals who are homeless.
• Coordination with Karuk Housing Authority on housing needs for the tribe and identification of properties for joint housing projects between the City and Karuk Tribal Nation. • Throughout the process the City included Housing Element update information on the General Plan update website and in newsletters on various issues related to the housing element and opportunities to provide input (https://yrekageneralplan2044.com/housing/). • Planning Commission public hearing and draft Housing Element review on July 20, 2022. Presented Public Review Draft Housing Element update and community outreach efforts to representatives of Planning Commission, received public comments and facilitated discussion with the Planning Commission.
• City Council public hearing and draft Housing Element review on August 30, 2022. Presented Public Review Draft Housing Element update and community outreach efforts to representatives of the Council, received public comments and facilitated discussion with the Council.

Some of the issues identified through this process include the need for adequate workforce housing, low-income family housing with three or more bedrooms, programs for those experiencing homelessness, and non-vehicular access to everyday needs. These needs are incorporated into this document through policies and programs that encourage a wide range of housing types that can be accessed by individuals and families from all income levels. 92 City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 1 - 4 January 31, 2023
The City reached out to a broad range of stakeholders including those working to address special needs housing issues, transitional and supportive housing needs, and community health issues in the City and the County.

Throughout the interviews, the Project team asked interviewees about fair housing issues, and sought opinions on possible solutions to overcome constraints. The City has incorporated stakeholder feedback into its AFFH program, as well as into a variety of programs throughout the policies and programs.

The City of Yreka is primarily English speaking, white, and non-Hispanic (76.4% in 2020Census), but the city is seeing an increase in diversity of its residents. Hispanic, Punjabi, and Hmong residents are increasing in representation within the city. The city did not provide translated materials for the Housing Element update due to cost and lack of staff with the ability to translate the materials. There is a strong desire by the city to provide more diverse materials for public engagement. Housing element programs having a public outreach component include provisions that commit the city to providing printed and web-based content in Spanish and other languages, as requested, to reduce language barriers for non-English speakers, and to increase the diversity of print and online engagement materials to include these growing demographics of the community. Specially, programs HE-1.3.4 (Workforce and Affordable Housing), HE-3.2.1 (Fair Housing Laws), HE-5.1.1 (Technical Assistance for Homeowners), and HE-6.1.1 (Fair Housing Information) commit the city to providing languageinclusionary materials. Program HE-3.1.1, outlines the Affirmatively Further Fair Housing (AFFH) program, with AFFH metrics and milestones detailed in Table B-1 of Appendix B. The AFFH metrics and milestones similarly commit Yreka to reducing language barriers and improving the city’s public outreach by utilizing a variety of methods. As part of the city’s General Plan update that is in the early stages, the city is including Spanish and Punjabi translation and will include additional public engagement related to housing during this process.

The city has a large population experiencing some type and severity of disability in comparison with the nation and state of California (13.1% in 2020 Census). The city did provide additional materials at community meetings that were printed in larger text, captioned online meetings, and made accommodations for those unable to stand or walk to the podium due to a physical disability.

The City did not receive new public comments since the draft Element was submitted to HCD. 93 City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 1 - 5 January 31, 2023

4. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The Housing Element is one component of the City’s overall long-range planning strategy. The California Government Code requires that the General Plan contain an integrated, consistent goals and policies. State law requires that the Housing Element contain a statement of “the means by which consistency will be achieved with other general plan elements and community goals” (California Government Code, Section 65583[c] [6] [B]). This requires an evaluation of two primary characteristics: (1) an identification of other General Plan goals, policies, and programs that could affect implementation of the Housing Element or that could be affected by the implementation of the Housing Element; and (2) an identification of actions to ensure consistency between the Housing Element and affected parts of other General Plan elements. The adopted 2002–2022 General Plan (adopted 2003) is being updated in conjunction with this Housing Element which will help ensure consistency between the two documents. Programs developed as part of this element will be reflected in the rest of the General Plan Update. The City will maintain this consistency in the future by ensuring General Plan amendments are evaluated for consistency with all General Plan elements.

California state law requires all elements of the General Plan, including the Housing Element, to be internally consistent and compliant with state laws (Government Code § 65300.5). The City of Yreka 2002 General Plan is set to expire in 2022. The city began a comprehensive update process in December 2021 with an expected draft General Plan complete in Fall 2023. The comprehensive update will include all required elements of a General Plan and an additional Public Services and Facilities Element. The city plans to integrate environmental justice into each Element of the General Plan instead of a stand-alone element. (Note: The City also approved the General Plan update to include environmental justice in the Public Health and Safety Element that meets the minimum requirements for SB 1000.)
SB 1000 requires cities and counties with disadvantaged communities to incorporate environmental justice related goals, policies, and objectives into their general plans. Jurisdictions can address environmental justice in general plans either in a standalone element or integrated into other general plan elements, or both. This requirement must be fulfilled upon adoption or revision of two or more general plan elements concurrently on or after January 1, 2018.

5. LOOKING AHEAD
During the 6th cycle planning period (2023 to 2031), the City will pursue regional collaborations to better address housing issues. Programs that implement a regional approach include HE-2.2.1 for the formation of a regional housing trust fund, and HE-3.3.1 for the preparation of a multijurisdictional assessment of fair housing. While housing issues may not be uniform between Siskiyou County and the eight cities, Yreka believes there are likely more shared issues and solutions as many housing issues do not occur in isolation or silos. Also, there are many small jurisdictions in Siskiyou county and bringing the resources to bear to prepare a legally sufficient housing element is overly burdensome. Prior to the start of the 7th cycle, the City of Yreka would appreciate the Department of Housing and Community Development being willing to support the preparation of a regional housing element for the Siskiyou county region.
94 City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-1 January 31, 2023
CHAPTER 2 - GOALS, POLICIES, AND

PROGRAMS
This chapter of the Housing Element contains the City’s goals, policies, and the proposed strategy to implement its goals and policies. The goals and policies reflect the needs identified in the Housing Needs Assessment contained in Appendix A, including the community profile in Appendix A, Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing in Appendix B, and Constraints. Available funding resources for housing are discussed in Appendix B and are integrated into City’s strategy when applicable. Each proposed implementing action contains a description of the intended action, an explanation of the responsible agency, possible sources of funding (if applicable), the time frame during which the program would take effect, and anticipated results. Whenever possible, the anticipated results have been expressed in quantified terms.

Use of the bear icon below denotes Yreka programs that are intended to fulfill a specific State housing law requirement. For quick reference, Table 2-1 below, lists the programs that are intended to meet a State housing law mandate.

Table 2-1
Program HE-1.1.1 Program HE-4.1.1
Program HE-1.1.2 Program HE-4.2.1
Program HE-1.1.3 Program HE-4.4.1
Program HE-1.2.3 Program HE-6.1.1
Program HE-1.3.4 Program HE-6.1.2
Program HE-1.3.7 Program HE-6.1.6
Program HE-2.1.3 Program HE-7.1.1
Program HE-3.1.1 Program HE-7.2.1
Program HE-3.2.1
Goal HE-1
Accommodate the City's share of regional housing needs for all income groups during the planning period by ensuring an adequate supply of land for residential development.

Policy HE-1.1
Ensure Yreka provides adequate sites with appropriate zoning and available public facilities and services to meet the City's share of regional housing needs for all income groups during the housing element planning period and for five years of projected growth. These lands shall be available at any time with appropriate General Plan and Zoning regulations for residential development to reduce the impact that the lack of available land may have on the cost of single-family and multifamily development.

Program HE-1.1.1
To ensure at all times during the planning period the City has an adequate inventory to accommodate its designated regional housing need allocation, the City will evaluate entitlement and permit applications seeking 95 City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-2 January 31, 2023
to develop designated inventory sites for decreases in density and affordability of housing units consistent with No Net Loss Law, Government Code Section 65863 et seq. If project approval will result in an inventory deficit, steps will be taken to replace the lost inventory sites by rezoning qualified properties in other areas as needed to meet the City’s remaining RHNA for lower-income households in accordance with Government Code Section 65863 et seq.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: Application fee,General Fund
Timing: On a project-by-project basis; if an inventory deficit is found Program HE-1.1.2
As part of the annual Housing Element review, the Planning Commission will review the City’s vacant land inventory with the objective of ensuring that Yreka can accommodate a variety of housing types, the City’s RHNA, and projected growth. If an inventory deficit is projected to occur, steps will be taken to change the General Plan and zoning as needed to increase the amount of available land. The City will publish the inventory of sites on the City’s webpage and announce the availability of the inventory to the public, including the development community.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund
Timing: Annually; if an inventory deficit is projected
Program HE-1.1.3
1) In compliance with State law, i.e., subparagraph (a) of Government Code Section 65589.7, the City shall deliver the adopt housing element to all public agencies that provide water and sewer service in the City of Yreka.
2) The City shall grant priority for the provision of water and sewer services to proposed developments that include housing units affordable to lower income households, in compliance with State law, i.e., subparagraph (a) of Government Code Section 65589.7.
3) In compliance with State law, i.e., subparagraph (b) of Government Code Section 65589.7, the City shall establish written policies and procedures that grant priority for water and sewer to proposed development that includes housing affordable to lower-income households.

Administration: Planning Department and Department of Public Works, and City Manager Funding: General Fund
Timing: 1) Within thirty (3o) days of adoption of the 2023-2031 Housing Element; 2) Immediately and at all times for the duration of the 2023-2031 Housing Element; 3) within five years from adoption of the Housing Element
Policy HE-1.2
Provide a range of housing that varies sufficiently in terms of cost, design, size, location, and tenure to meet the housing needs of all economic segments of the community at a level no greater than that which can be supported by the infrastructure. To facilitate housing construction and rehabilitation of the existing housing stock, the City shall prepare amendments to the Zoning Code for by-right multifamily development that meet objective development and performance standards to reduce the time and expense of the entitlement and permitting process.
96 City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-3 January 31, 2023
Program HE-1.2.1
The City shall amend the Zoning Code for the R-3, R-2 and RPO zones by offering ministerial review for qualified housing developments to reduce the time and expense of the entitlement and building permit process for multifamily development. The amendments shall:
1) Increase the by-right allowable density of the RPO, R-3-12 and R-2 zones from 12 dwelling units per acre to 15 dwelling units per acre.
2) In the RPO, R-3 and R-2 zones allow by-right apartment or condominium housing developments with dwelling groups configured as more than 4-plexes
3) Any development, design and performance standards for the R-3, R-2 and RPO zones shall be objective, and any non-objective development, design and performance standards shall be repealed. 4) For sites designated in the City’s adopted affordable inventory, the Zoning Code amendments shall consider incorporation of the following requirements:
a) Sites be developed at a minimum residential density. b) Development of a single family residence be subject to approval of an ultimate development plan demonstrating the site can accommodate multifamily development at the minimum density, including ancillary multifamily uses and development.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund
Timing: As part of the City’s comprehensive update of its General Plan and Zoning Code. Release of Public Draft: Q4 2023; with adoption targeted for 2024
Program HE-1.2.2
The City shall offer Fast Track review of entitlement and building permit applications for housing projects. The City shall complete its review of the application within 60 days after the application is complete for a project with 50 or fewer units, or within 60 days after the application is complete for a project with more than 50 units. Mixeduse development consisting of residential and nonresidential uses with at least two-thirds of the square footage designated for residential use shall be eligible for Fast Track review.

Program HE-1.2.3
The City shall amend all applicable provisions of the Yreka Municipal Code pertaining to Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), including Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs), to be compliant with State law.

Administration: Planning Department
Funding: General Fund
Timing: No later than one (1) year of the date of the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) letter, or as part of the City’s comprehensive update of its General Plan and Zoning Code. Release of Public Draft: Q4 2023; with adoption targeted for 2024, whichever occurs first. 97 City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-4 January 31, 2023
Policy HE-1.3
Encourage infill development and adaptive reuse. The City will explore strategies to convert abandoned, vacant, and underutilized commercial and industrial sites into workforce and affordable housing, including mixed-use development.

Program HE-1.3.1
The City will amend the Zoning Code to include a mixed-use zone that will allow by-right housing development.

The mixed-use zone development, design and performance standards for residential development and accessory residential development and shall be objective, and will allow housing units on the ground floor by-right. During the amendment process, the City shall consider the incorporation of micro-units (approximately 350 square feet and smaller) into mixed-use designs and consider objective development standards for micro-units.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund
Timing: As part of the City’s comprehensive updates of the General Plan and Zoning Code. Release of Public Drafts: Q4 2023; with adoption targeted for 2024.

Program HE-1.3.2
The City will complete an inventory of sites that are appropriate for residential development and mixed-use development. The inventory will have three major categories:

1. Vacant and underutilized commercial and industrial sites

2. Sites eligible for up-zoning to allow up to 10 dwelling units per parcel pursuant to Government Code Section 65913.5 (SB 10, 2021)

3. Sites that are eligible for ministerial streamlining pursuant to Government Code Section 65913.4 et seq.

Evaluation criteria shall prioritize:
• The proximity to amenities, such as medical, grocery, transit, public recreation facilities, and other essentials.
• Existing infrastructure and its ability to service new residential development • Geographic areas with reduced flooding and wildfire risk.

The City will consult with the development community including non-profit housing developers to determine other criteria to be used to evaluate vacant and underutilized commercial and industrial sites. Upon completion, the inventory shall be published on the City’s website to be readily accessible to the public and development community.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund
Timing: Creation of inventory by 2024; Annual review and update as needed.

Program HE-1.3.3
The City will offer a voluntary rezoning program as part of the General Plan update. The rezoning program will have two categories for sites identified in the Program HE-1.4.2 inventory:

1. Sites that are vacant and underutilized commercial and industrial properties.

2. Sites eligible for up-zoning to allow up to 10 dwelling units per parcel pursuant to Government Code Section 65913.5 (SB 10, 2021)
98 City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-5 January 31, 2023
The City will engage property owners of identified sites to discuss opportunities to allow by-right multifamily housing. For willing property owners, the City will offer a rezoning program that includes the City underwriting the rezoning costs to amend the land use regulations for volunteered properties to encourage property owner participation.

Program HE-1.3.4
The City will improve awareness and support for the City’s workforce and affordable housing programs citywide by publicly sharing information on the City’s website about zoning ordinances, development standards, fees, exactions, surplus public lands, fair housing resources, and housing affordability requirements. This program will be implemented consistent with the requirements of AB 1483 (2019). To improve the dissemination of the City’s affordable housing programs, the City will provide information, printed and as web content, in Spanish and other languages, as requested, to reduce barriers for non-English speakers. The City will perform proactive public outreach using a variety of methods that may include in-person or virtual participation, e.g., development industry events or workshops, and direct contact with developers and property owners to improve the dissemination of information about the City’s affordable housing programs.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund
Timing: Within in one year from adoption of the Housing Element. To improve awareness of the City’s affordable housing programs, the City will participate in an industry event, workshop or similar public event/activity at least once a year beginning in 2025.

Program HE-1.3.5
The City will consider adoption of a housing impact fee ordinance or an inclusionary housing ordinance that includes an allowance for payment of an in-lieu fee. A housing impact fee ordinance, if enacted would enable the City to charge developers a fee for each square foot of new market-rate construction and use the funds to pay for affordable housing. A housing impact fee is structured to require payment of fees rather development of units onsite. An inclusionary housing ordinance, if enacted, increases the supply of affordable units by requiring developers to reserve a certain percentage of housing units for very low, low and moderate-income households in new residential developments, or pay an in-lieu fee. In-lieu fees are typically deposited into a housing trust fund where they can be used to finance affordable housing development.

For either option the City will prepare background studies. The background studies will include an evaluation of the financial feasibility and resource requirements to implement either a housing impact fee or an inclusionary housing ordinance. The feasibility analysis will also assess the impact of a fee or ordinance on the financial feasibility of a prototype rental project in Yreka (similar to what a developer would do when considering a marketrate housing project). The financial feasibility study should include a pro forma analysis (i.e., a comparison of development costs and rental revenues) of a prototype rental development to determine if a housing impact fee or an inclusionary housing ordinance would affect the financial feasibility of development. For either approach, the City may consider allocating collected funds to a local housing trust fund where the funds can be used to finance affordable housing development.
99 City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-6 January 31, 2023
Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund
Timing: As part of the City’s comprehensive update of its General Plan and Zoning Code. Release of Public Draft: Q4 2023; with adoption targeted for 2024.

Program HE-1.3.6
Repeal of Article XXXIV of the State Constitution (Article 34) to remove regulatory barriers for affordable rental housing. The City will support and actively lobby for State and/or local initiatives and referendums that seek the repeal of Article 34 of the State Constitution. Should the State or local initiatives or referendums fail to progress or pass, the City shall initiate an Article 34 initiative that, if passed by a majority of qualified voters, would allow the City to develop, construct or acquire low cost rental housing, or to partner with non-profit housing developers using State funding.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund
Timing: Completed in accordance with the Siskiyou County office of elections deadlines for inclusion on the November 2028 General Election ballot.

Program HE-1.3.7
The City shall implement Government Code Section 65913.4 et seq., the Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process, also referred to as SB 35. To implement SB 35, the City shall prepare written procedures and forms meeting the requirements of state law. The City shall publish its SB 35 procedures on its website, and shall make its SB 35 forms and materials available for download on the website. Printed copies of the City’s procedures, forms and other related materials shall be made available at the Planning Department’s public information counter also.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund
Timing: Within one year from adoption of the 6th cycle housing element.

Goal HE-2
Encourage the provision and production of workforce and affordable housing. To increase workforce and other affordable housing opportunities within Yreka’s existing housing stock the City will support the production of 250 new workforce housing units by 2030.

Policy HE-2.1
The City will assist in the development of workforce and affordable housing through site identification, supporting funding applications, land donation, expedited permit review, approval of requests density bonus or development incentives, direct funding when feasible, and other incentives. The City will work with the Karuk Tribe Housing Authority, market rate and nonprofit housing developers, and community organizations to develop workforce and affordable housing.
100
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-7 January 31, 2023
Program HE-2.1.1
The City shall complete an inventory of City-owned properties that are no longer needed for current or foreseeable future public operations and are excess. If the inventory identifies excess City-owned properties, the City will commence the process of surplusing and disposing of the properties in accordance with Government Code Sections 54220-54234. Properties shall be made available for the development of affordable housing to the maximum extent feasible. The City shall encourage other public entities to inventory excess properties and make them available for affordable housing in accordance with Government Code Sections 54220-54234.

Administration: Planning Department, Department of Public Works, City Manager Funding: General Fund, and other state and federal funds identified for specific projects/planning activities such as Community Development Block Grant, Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME), California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) programs, CalHome Program.

Timing: The process of inventorying City-owned shall commence within one year of Housing Element adoption, and shall be completed 18 months after commencement. City-owned properties that are identified in the inventory will be made available within one (1) year from when the inventory is complete Program HE-2.1.2
The City will adopt a fee deferral Code that will offer waivers or deferrals of City-controlled impact fees for housing developments that include a specified minimum percentage of workforce and affordable dwelling units.

Objective: Subsidize up to 60 housing units over a period of five years Program HE-2.1.3
1) The City shall provide density bonuses to homebuilders proposing to include qualifying dwelling units within residential developments consistent with Government Code Section 65915 et seq. 2a) The City shall review Chapter 16.78 of Title 16, Yreka Municipal Code, to ensure compliance with State Density Bonus Law, Government Code Section 65915 et seq. If needed, the City shall prepare amendments to Chapter 16.78 of Title 16, Yreka Municipal Code to ensure compliance with State law. 2b) During the planning period, The City shall monitor State law for amendments to density bonus law, Government Code Section 65915,to ensure ongoing compliance with State law. If State law is amended such that revisions to the City of Yreka’s Zoning Code are necessary for legal compliance, the City will initiate amendments to Title 16 of the Yreka Municipal Code.
3) The City will prepare and publish materials on the City’s website informing property owners and housing developers of the City’s density bonus program for qualified housing developments.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund
Timing: 1) At all times during the 6th cycle. 2a) By Q2 of 2023; 2b) annually, with amendments to Title 16 of the Yreka Municipal Code as needed. 3) To be completed by Q4 of 2024. 101
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-8 January 31, 2023
Program HE-2.1.4
The City shall prepare amendments to the Title 16 of the Yreka Municipal Code to allow small and large employee housing by-right CPO, C-2, CH, and CT zones when located within a distance a person can reasonably walk to services (e.g., a quarter mile) or a transit stop is within a quarter mile of the development, and that meets other applicable zoning requirements for employee housing. Employee housing proposed in CPO, C-2, CH, and CT zones and to be located at a greater walking distance shall be subject to a use permit. All development and performance standards shall be objective.

Administration: Planning and Building Department
Funding: General Fund
Timing: As part of the City’s update of its General Plan. Release of Public Draft: Q4 2023; with adoption targeted for 2024.

Program HE-2.1.5
The City will provide assistance to developers who are preparing funding applications for workforce and affordable housing projects, including housing for extremely low income and special needs households, that require a public agency applicant. The City will also consider providing staff support in providing needed information for funding requests to increase the likelihood of receiving state or federal funding. City staff is available to meet with nonprofit and for-profit affordable housing providers to determine their interest in, and plans for, constructing affordable housing in Yreka, including developing infill sites or converting nonresidential buildings. Based on the clients to be served by proposed projects and the type of housing and services to be incorporated into funding requests, the City will assist the housing provider in identifying the most appropriate state and/or federal funding sources.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager, Finance Department Funding: General fund and various state or federal programs, depending on the clients to be served and the type of housing to be provided. May include Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME programs (federal funds administered by the State of California for non-entitlement cities and counties), the Multifamily Housing Program, California Housing Finance Agency programs (such as HELP), tax-exempt bond financing, low-income housing tax credits, the Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program, USDA and other funding for farmworker housing, and various other US Department of Housing and Urban Development programs for special needs groups.

Timing: Annual contact with affordable housing providers through the planning period; additional contacts as needed to discuss project-specific issues.

Policy HE-2.2
The City will advocate and participate in the creation of a Siskiyou Regional Housing Trust Fund for the creation and preservation of affordable housing. The formation of a regional housing trust fund is a starting point for creating a local funding source for the development of workforce and affordable housing, housing rehabilitation, and enable local housing projects to be eligible to apply for Local Housing Trust Fund program funding administered by the State.

Program HE-2.2.1
The City shall coordinate and collaborate with Siskiyou County and the eight cities in Siskiyou county for the establishment of a regional housing trust fund. A housing trust fund means a public, joint public and private fund or charitable nonprofit organization described in 2.5.2.18. Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, 102
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-9 January 31, 2023
established by legislation, Code, resolution (including nonprofit articles of incorporation), or a public-private partnership organized to receive specific revenue to address local or regional housing needs.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund
Timing: Initiate within two years, i.e., by December 2025, from the adoption of the Housing Element, with outreach to the Siskiyou County and the eight cities occurring at least annually until 2031.

Policy HE-2.3
The City shall support and encourage the development and construction industries to implement new technologies and opportunities to build housing that is more affordable by design, that make more efficient use of land and materials, including water conserving systems, energy systems, dwelling designs, and uses of recycled materials for building. The City shall also encourage and support sweat-equity and collaborative construction methods.

Program HE-2.3.1
1) Support Workforce Pathways into the Construction Industry in Yreka and Siskiyou County. The City shall support local efforts to expand the construction workforce. 2) Promote the use of energy conservation measures in all housing through the use of public and private weatherization programs. Provide information on currently available weatherization and energy conservation programs to residents of the city. The City will have information available for the public at the front counter of City Hall and will distribute information through an annual mailing. 3) Continue to enforce state requirements, including Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, for energy conservation in new residential projects and encourage residential developers to employ additional energy conservation measures for the siting of buildings, landscaping, and solar access through development standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance, Building Code, and Specific Plans as appropriate.

Administration: Planning Department, Building Department, City Manager Funding: General Fund
Timing: 1) 2023-2031; 2) Initiate no later than December 2025; 3) Because this is a current building code requirement, the City will implement it as part of the building permit application and review process.

Program HE-2.3.2
City will consider preparing amendments to the Yreka Municipal Code for adaptive reuse to increase the flexibility of the zoning regulations to encourage the adaptive reuse of vacant or underutilized commercial buildings to housing. To incentivize conversion and reuse of underutilized commercial buildings to workforce housing, the amendments will consider development and adoption of alternative building standards that are designed to provide a reasonable level of safety to the building occupants and conformance with California Health and Safe Code Section 17958.11.

Administration: Planning Department, Building Department, City Manager Funding: General Fund
Timing: As part of the City’s update of its General Plan. Release of Public Draft: Q4 2023; with adoption targeted for 2024.
103
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-10 January 31, 2023
Goal HE-3
Take actions to address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, or disability.

Program HE-3.1.1
In an effort to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing (AFFH), the City will develop an AFFH Plan that shall take actions to address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming areas of concentrated poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair-housing laws for all persons in accordance with state and federal law.
104
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-11 January 31, 2023

Id # City AFFH
Action
AFFH Goals Geographic
Targets
Deliverable(s) & Metrics for Determining Success Milestone and Timeline 1 Metrics Track efficacy of
AFFH actions, and
make adjustments
as needed.

Citywide Annual reporting to the Planning Commission and annual adjustments to increase goal attainment
First annual report in 2024
with the housing element
annual progress report

2.a New housing
choices and
affordability
Increase the
availability of
workforce and
affordable housing
in areas of
opportunity.

Citywide and areas
near Yreka’s
downtown area and
generally
northwestern
neighborhoods.

The City will continue to collaborate with the County and nonprofit housing organizations and developers to encourage development of affordable workforce housing development, including
rehabilitation and adaptive reuse. The City will meet the County and nonprofit housing organizations and developers no less than twice a year, and will provide summaries of meetings to the Planning Commission.

First meeting within 24
months of adoption of
housing element, and
provide summaries with
the housing element
annual progress report (HE
APR) thereafter.

2.b New housing
choices and
affordability:

By-Right
workforce and
affordable
housing
Improve access to
opportunity by
increasing the
availability of
workforce and
affordable housing
in high resource
areas.

Citywide and areas
near Yreka’s
downtown area and
generally
northwestern
neighborhoods.

Encourage a variety of housing types and density increases near commercial and community services, schools, transit, etc. by amending the Zoning Code (as per Chapter 2 of the Housing Element) to address development standards that are barriers to the creation of a variety of housing types in high opportunity areas. Annual summary of by-right permits sought and granted by type, estimated unit affordability, and tenure.

Complete Zoning Code
amendments by
2024. Annually with HE
APR the calendar year
following adoption of the
Zoning Code
Amendments.

2.c By New
housing
choices and
affordability:

By-right
workforce and
affordable
housing
Increase the
availability of
housing in high
resource areas to
improve access to
opportunity
Citywide and areas
near Yreka’s
downtown area and
generally
northwestern
neighborhoods.

Promote and support mixed income housing developments and neighborhoods by encouraging new workforce and affordable housing in high resource areas and promoting homeownership opportunities throughout the City, particularly in low resource areas. Annual summary of by-right permits sought and granted by type, estimated unit affordability, and tenure.

Complete Zoning Code
amendments by
2024. Annually with HE
APR the calendar year
following adoption of the
Zoning Code
Amendments.

3.a AFFH
Outreach
Inform residents of
fair housing
resources
Citywide Support non-profit organizations that provide multi-lingual landlord/tenant mediation, foreclosure assistance, or tenant legal counseling services.

First meeting within 24
months of adoption of
housing element, and
meet with organizations at
least biannually thereafter
105
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-12 January 31, 2023
Id # City AFFH
Action
AFFH Goals Geographic
Targets
Deliverable(s) & Metrics for Determining Success Milestone and Timeline

3.b Fair housing
education:

AFFH
Outreach
Inform residents of
fair housing
resources
Citywide, and
residents residing in
neighborhoods east
of Interstate 5 and
Fairchild Hospital
neighborhoods.

Expand outreach to ensure residents are informed on fair housing assistance programs, fair housing rights and remedies, and the range of fair housing incentives available in Yreka. Use multiple outreach pathways that include distribution of printed materials and web materials.

First annual report no later
than 2025 as part of the
housing element annual
progress report, annually
thereafter as part of the
HE APR.

3.c Fair housing
education:

AFFH
Brochure
Inform residents of
fair housing
resources
Citywide, and
residents residing in
neighborhoods east
of Interstate 5 and
Fairchild Hospital
neighborhoods.

Develop a AFFH brochure. Include brochures with utility billing at least twice during the 2023-2031 planning period. Place printed brochures and other AFFH materials at multiple venues, such as City Hall, libraries, and public counters of social service organizations.

First annual report no later
than 2025 as part of the
HE APR, annually
thereafter as part of the
HE APR.

3.d Fair housing
education:
reduce
language
barriers
Inform residents of
fair housing
resources and
housing
opportunities to
English and nonEnglish speakers.

Citywide, and
residents residing in
neighborhoods east
of Interstate 5 and
Fairchild Hospital
neighborhoods.

Provide printed materials and web content on fair housing and housing opportunities in Spanish and other languages, as requested.

First annual report no later
than 2025 as part of the
housing element annual
progress report, annually
thereafter as part of the
HE APR.

3.e Fair housing
education:

Distribution of
information
about AFFH
Inform City staff,
elected officials,
and appointees of
fair housing issues
for consistent
implementation.

Citywide Provide training for staff, elected officials, and appointees on issues of fair housing. City Council meetings will include a fair housing presentation at biannually.

Begin in calendar year
2025

3.f AFFH Outreach Improve housing
choice for residents
Citywide, and
residents residing in
neighborhoods east
of Interstate 5 and
Fairchild Hospital
neighborhoods.

Develop a program to connect lower-income, including Extremely Income residents with affordable rental and homeownership opportunities in the City.

First annual report in 2025,
as part of the HE APR.
106
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-13 January 31, 2023
Id # City AFFH
Action
AFFH Goals Geographic
Targets
Deliverable(s) & Metrics for Determining Success Milestone and Timeline

4.a Housing rehab
and
conservation
Improve habitability
and maintain
inventory of housing
that is affordable
Citywide, and
residents residing in
neighborhoods east
of Interstate 5 and
Fairchild Hospital
neighborhoods.

Develop a proactive code enforcement program that focuses on areas having concentrated rehabilitation needs. Program implementation to result in repairs and retention of housing, and mitigates potential cost, displacement, and relocation impacts on residents.

Begin in calendar year
2025, and provide
summaries to the Planning
Commission no less than
annually as part of the HE
APR.

4.b Implement
Replacement
Housing law
Reduce
displacement of
residents
Citywide and areas
near Yreka’s
downtown area and
generally
northwestern
neighborhoods.

Areas targeted for growth (e.g., such as job and housing rich areas, revitalization areas) implement replacement requirements on sites identified to accommodate the housing needs of lower income households (see Program HE-4.4.1).

First annual report in 2025,
then annual with the HE
APR

5.a Funding to
transform low
resource areas
to high
resource areas
Community
conservation and
revitalization
Citywide, and
residents residing in
neighborhoods east
of Interstate 5.

Seek state and federal funding to improve infrastructure and access to opportunity in areas not currently designated as high resource.

City will apply for state and
federal infrastructure
funding as it becomes
available

5.b Encourage
Neighborhood
Revitalization
Create more
inclusive and
equitable
neighborhoods
Citywide, and
residents residing in
neighborhoods east
of Interstate 5 and
Fairchild Hospital
neighborhoods.

Encourage residents from areas of concentrated poverty to serve on boards, committees, task forces and other local government decision-making bodies. When vacancies arise availability will be advertised using neighborhood channels and the City website.

Begin in calendar year
2025, and provide
summaries to the City
Council no less than
annually.

5.c Job Creation Reduce poverty Citywide, and
residents residing in
neighborhoods east
of Interstate 5 and
Fairchild Hospital
neighborhoods.

The City shall support efforts to connect low-income residents with financial empowerment resources, homeownership programs, small business assistance, living wage jobs, and workforce training resources and services.

First annual report no later
than 2025 as part of the
HE APR, annually
thereafter as part of the
HE APR.

5.d Housing
Mobility and
Neighborhood
Revitalization
Create more
inclusive and
equitable
neighborhoods, and
increase access to
opportunity.

Citywide, and
residents residing in
neighborhoods east
of Interstate 5 and
Fairchild Hospital
neighborhoods.

The City will meet with representative groups of community residents, including non-English speakers, to identify housing needs and solutions at the neighborhood level, particularly in areas targeted for inclusive economic and community development.

First annual report no later
than 2025 as part of the
HE APR, annually
thereafter as part of the
HE APR.
107
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-14 January 31, 2023
Id # City AFFH
Action
AFFH Goals Geographic
Targets
Deliverable(s) & Metrics for Determining Success Milestone and Timeline

5.e Protecting
existing
residents from
displacement
Reduce
displacement of
residents
Citywide, and
residents residing in
neighborhoods east
of Interstate 5 and
Fairchild Hospital
neighborhoods.

Consider creation of a rent stabilization program that follows California Civil Code 1946.2 as part of the amendments to the Zoning Code.

By 2024, if adopted as part
of the Zoning Code
amendments. If adopted,
reported annually as part
of the housing element
annual progress report.
108
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-15 January 31, 2023
Policy HE-3.2
Eliminate housing discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, ancestry, marital status, age, household composition or size, or any other arbitrary factor.

Program HE-3.2.1
(Program HE-3.2.1 is the same program as HE-6.1.1 below) 1) Continue to support the enforcement of the fair housing laws to protect against housing discrimination by providing adequate information about renters’ rights, and promote equal housing opportunity. 2) The City will provide a referral service to those who handle complaints against discrimination. Such complaints are to be filed with the City Manager.
3) To improve the dissemination of fair housing information, the City will make information on fair housing available to the public, through the posting of fair housing information in City Hall and in other public buildings, on the City’s website, distribution to existing apartment complexes, and publishing information and materials on the City’s website. The City will provide fair housing materials, printed and as web content, in Spanish and other languages, as requested, to reduce barriers for non-English speakers. 4) The City will perform proactive public outreach using a variety of methods, e.g., community events, workshops and direct contact with developers, property owners, and tenants, to improve the dissemination of fair housing information, laws, and resources.

Accountability:CityManager
Funding: General Fund
Timing: 1) and 2) and 3) 2023-2031: materials and information about the City’s procedures for requesting reasonable accommodation from the Title 16 – Zoning, Yreka Municipal Code will be made available on the City’s website within 120 days of the effective date. 4) Commence no later than Q3 2024, and no less than annually thereafter.

Policy HE-3.3
Regional collaboration is a more meaningful and effective approach for assessing fair housing issues because fair housing issues do not recognize jurisdictional boundaries. In advance of the start of the 7th housing element cycle, the City will support preparation of a regional assessment of fair housing, the development of coordinated programs including those that enable joint funding opportunities.

Program HE-3.3.1
The City shall coordinate with Siskiyou County and the other eight cities for the completion of a multijurisdictional assessment of fair housing (AFH) that meets the requirements of Government Code Section 65583(c)(9(A). The completed AFH is to be adequate so participating jurisdictions may incorporate it into their 7th cycle housing elements.

The multijurisdictional AFH will identify elements and factors that cause, increase, contribute to, maintain, or perpetuate segregation, racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, significant disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs, and recommend a program(s) to address identified fair housing issues.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund
Timing: Commencing either no later than January 2031 or prior the start of Siskiyou county’s 7th housing element cycle projection period, whichever occurs first.
109
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-16 January 31, 2023
Goal HE-4
Preserve, maintain, rehabilitate, and enhance the quality of existing dwelling units and residential neighborhoods to ensure full utilization of the city’s existing housing resources for as long as physically and economically feasible.

Policy HE-4.1
Establish a procedure that provides adequate notice, relocation and other assistance for mobile home park residents consistent with State law in the event a mobile home park is to be converted to another use.

Program HE-4.1.1
The City shall adopt a mobile home park conversion ordinance to establish a procedure is to ensure that any conversion of mobile home parks to other uses is preceded by adequate notice, and that relocation and other assistance is provided park residents, consistent with the provisions of the California Government Code, Section 65863.7.

Policy HE-4.2
The City shall prioritize the preservation of existing affordable housing at risk of loss of affordability covenants as a critical means of mitigating the displacement and loss of affordable housing units from the City’s inventory.

Program HE-4.2.1
The City will take the following actions to mitigate the potential conversion of assisted affordable units, such as the Deer Creek apartments, to market-rate units.
1) The City will coordinate with owners of expiring subsidies to ensure tenants receive the required notices at 3 years, 6 months, and 12 months, per California law. The owner will be required to provide written notification to residents of the expected date of loan prepayment or payoff, at which time the owner will no longer be restricted in the level of rent that can be charged. The notice will also contain an estimate of rent increases at the time rental restrictions no longer apply. Residents moving into a housing development during this one-year period must also be notified in writing of the pending conversion prior to signing a rental agreement. 2) Property owners will provide relocation assistance to those low-income households who are unable to afford rent increases.
3) If an affordable housing project indicates it is opting out of its affordability restrictions, the City will ensure that affected residents receive notification of the owner’s intent and will provide nonfinancial assistance with relocation. 4) The City will solicit interested nonprofit housing corporations and local housing authorities to acquire and maintain such projects as low-income housing, including extremely low income housing and special needs households. The City will assist an interested nonprofit housing corporation or housing authority in applying for state or federal assistance for acquisition.

Administration: Planning Department and City Manager
Funding: California Housing Finance Agency Preservation, Acquisition Financing Mortgage Insurance for Purchase/Refinance (HUD)
Time Frame: Contact property owners by December 31, 2023, to determine future ownership plans; implement preservation strategy if owners indicate desire to sell or convert their properties. 110
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-17 January 31, 2023
Policy HE-4.3
Rehabilitation and Preservation. The City shall use preservation, conversion, and/or rehabilitation as tools to improve substandard single-unit homes and multi-unit affordable housing to preserve the existing housing stock and affordability.

Program HE-4.3.1
1) Using accepted best practices, the City shall conduct housing conditions survey. The survey will also identify housing units and/or neighborhoods where there may be concentrations of substandard housing to assist with prioritization of funding for rehabilitation of housing units.
2) The City shall develop an owner-occupied rehabilitation (OOR) program and apply for funding. If the City has available program income and OOR is an eligible use of program income per grantor, the City’s program income guidelines shall be amended to include an OOR activity, and allocating a portion of program income to the OOR activity.

Administration: Planning Department
Funding: General Fund
Timing: 1) To be completed by Q1 2023 2) The City will develop the OOR program and apply for funding by December 2025 .

Program HE-4.3.2
Utilize the code enforcement program as a means of keeping track of the condition of the city’s housing stock. This, along with periodic review by the Planning Commission and the City Council of residential areas needing improvements, could identify needed code enforcement, necessary improvements to city infrastructure, and/or the opportunity to obtain financing for improvements. As feasible, the City will continue to prioritize code enforcement and provide adequate funding and staffing to support code enforcement programs. (This program was identified as Program HE.3.1.3 in the previous housing element)
Administration: City Manager, Building Department, Planning Department Funding: General Fund
Timing: To be completed by December 2025.

Policy HE-4.4
To mitigate the loss of affordable housing units on inventory sites, the City shall immediately begin implementing replacement housing, when applicable, pursuant to Government Code Section 65583.2(g)(3) and adopt a local policy. The replacement housing policy requires new housing developments to replace all affordable housing units lost due to new development.

Program HE-4.4.1
The City shall prepare and adopt a replacement housing policy consistent with Government Code Section 65583.2(g)(3).

The City will adopt a policy and will require replacement housing units subject to the requirements of Government Code section 65915, subdivision (c)(3) on sites identified in the site inventory when any new development (residential, mixeduse or nonresidential) occurs on a site that is identified in the inventory meeting the following conditions:
• currently has residential uses or within the past five years has had residential uses that have been vacated or demolished, and
• was subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of low or very low-income, or
111
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-18 January 31, 2023
• subject to any other form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power, or
• occupied by low or very low-income households.

The City’s policy will also consider how to provide disclosure for properties subject to replacement housing for future property owners.

Administration: Planning Department
Funding: General Fund
Timeframes: The replacement requirement will be implemented immediately and applied as applications on identified sites are received and processed, and local policy shall be adopted by January 1, 2026.

Goal HE-5
Encourage diverse housing opportunities by promoting the creation and retention of affordable workforce housing, housing that is affordable by design, and designs for shared and intergenerational housing, including pursuing available public and private resources.

Policy HE-5.1
The City shall promote accessory dwelling units and SB 9 (2021) housing development by developing tools, resources, and educational materials to increase awareness and support, with the objective of increasing the development of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and SB 9 (2021) housing developments in neighborhoods throughout the City.

Program HE-5.1.1
The City shall initiate a technical assistance program for homeowners to facilitate and accelerate the development of ADUs, JADUs, and SB 9 (2021) housing units on their property. Components of the technical assistance program will include a toolkit and a public outreach plan:
• Develop access to an online inventory of pre-approved ADU plans. The City will obtain permission for use and publication from other California jurisdictions. The City building official will perform plan checks and develop a corrections list, as needed, to ensure compliance with local building regulations. • Pre-screen parcels at a programmatic level using readily available public information to identify parcels eligible for SB 9 (2021) housing developments and ministerial lot splits. • Development of customer-oriented online tools and resources to disseminate information about the ADU and SB 9 development.
• Internal staff training
• Consultation with local lending institutions, and recruitment of ADU and SB 9 ambassadors. • To improve the dissemination of the City’s technical assistance program for ADUs, JADUs, and SB 9 (2021) housing, the City will provide information, printed and as web content, in Spanish and other languages, as requested, to reduce barriers for non-English speakers. • The City will perform proactive public outreach using a variety of methods, e.g., community events such as a farmer’s market, workshops and direct contact with developers and property owners to improve the dissemination of information about the City’s technical assistance program for ADUs, JADUs, and SB 9 (2021) housing.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund, LEAP and REAP
112
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-19 January 31, 2023
Timing: Initiate within 18 months of adoption of the housing element and complete by 2024. To improve resident awareness of the City ADUs, JADUs, and SB 9 (2021) housing programs, the City will participate in a community event, workshop, or similar public event/activity at least once a year beginning in 2025.

Program HE-5.1.2
The City shall apply for State program funding that allows awarded funds to be used to support development accessory dwelling units, e.g., CalHOME.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund, LEAP and REAP
Timing: Initiate within 18 months of adoption of the 2023-2031 housing element and complete by 2024.

Policy HE-5.2
The City will prepare amendments to the Zoning Code to allow moveable tiny houses as accessory dwelling units.

Program HE-5.2.1
The City shall amend the Zoning Code to allow moveable tiny houses as permanent accessory dwelling units that shall be subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone when connected to utilities, tied down and objective health, safety and design standards are met. Moveable tiny houses meeting the standards shall be allowed outside of manufactured home and special occupancy parks.

Administration: Planning Department
Funding: General Fund
Timing: As part of the City’s comprehensive updates of the General Plan and Zoning Code. Release of Public Draft: Q4 2023; with adoption targeted for 2024
Policy HE-5.3
Explore ways to finance, staff, and support local community revitalization and housing rehabilitation programs, senior residents home repair, energy conservation, weatherization, and self-help preventive maintenance programs.

Program HE-5.3.1
Continue to support staff efforts to expand on their housing knowledge base. Set aside funds for staff to be involved in classes, conferences, and training opportunities that will ensure that they are up to date on the latest housing and community development trends, strategies, and funding sources. Also, maintain membership and remain on mailing lists for all relevant housing-related state departments and organizations.

Administration: Finance Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund
Timeframes: Annually, 2023-2031
Goal HE-6
Ensure that all persons are provided a choice of housing locations within the community, regardless of race, ethnicity, color, religion, sexual orientation, natural origin, marital status, disability familial status, or other protected characteristic.
113
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-20 January 31, 2023
Policy HE-6.1
Eliminate housing discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, ancestry, marital status, age, household composition or size, disability, or any other arbitrary factor.

Program HE-6.1.1
(Program HE-6.1.1 is the same program as HE-3.2.1 above) 1) Continue to support the enforcement of the fair housing laws to protect against housing discrimination by providing adequate information about renters’ rights, and promote equal housing opportunity. 2) The City will provide a referral service to those who handle complaints against discrimination. Such complaints are to be filed with the City Manager.
3) To improve the dissemination of fair housing information, the City will make information on fair housing available to the public, through the posting of fair housing information in City Hall and in other public buildings, on the City’s website, distribution to existing apartment complexes, and publishing information and materials on the City’s website. The City will provide fair housing materials, printed and as web content, in Spanish and other languages, as requested, to reduce barriers for non-English speakers. 4) The City will perform proactive public outreach using a variety of methods, e.g., community events, workshops and direct contact with developers, property owners, and tenants, to improve the dissemination of fair housing information, laws, and resources.

Program HE-6.1.2
The City shall review the existing procedures for requesting reasonable accommodation from Title 16 – Zoning, Yreka Municipal Code, for consistency with federal and state law, and shall prepare amendments that will codify the reasonable accommodation procedures as part of Title 16 of the Yreka Municipal Code. Specifically, the language of existing procedures shall be reviewed to ensure the reasonable accommodation procedures extend to the City’s parking regulations and providers of housing for persons with disabilities are eligible to request accommodation.

Responsibility:Planning Department
Funding: General Fund
Timing: As part of the City’s update of its comprehensive Zoning Code revision. Release of Public Draft: Q4 2023; with adoption targeted for 2024.

Program HE-6.1.3
Continue to collaborate with housing providers and community groups who represent persons with disabilities to ensure that special housing needs are addressed for seniors, large families, female-headed households, single-parent households with children, persons with disabilities and developmental disabilities, and homeless individuals and families.

The City will seek to meet these special housing needs through a combination of regulatory incentives, zoning standards, new housing construction programs, and supportive services programs. The City will leverage existing available regulatory incentives provided by State law, e.g., density bonus, SB 10 (2021), supportive housing developments, accessory dwelling units, Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process (SB 35), etc. Local regulatory incentives that will be 114
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-21 January 31, 2023
provided with adoption of Programs HE-1.2.1, HE-1.3.1, HE-1.3.1, HE-1.3.3, HE-2.1.1, HE-2.1.2, etc. as discussed above, will also be leverage once local regulations are adopted. In addition, the City may seek funding under the federal Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS, California Child Care Facilities Finance Program, and other state and federal programs designated specifically for special needs groups such as seniors, persons with disabilities, and persons at risk for homelessness. (Formerly Program HE.2.1.7)
Responsibility:CityManager, Planning Department
Funding: General Fund and Grant Funding
Timing: City staff will meet with housing providers and community groups no less than annually, from 2023 to 2031. The City will apply for funding annually from 2023-2031.

Program HE-6.1.4
The City will amend Title 16 – Zoning, Yreka Municipal Code to remove the distinction between small and large group homes in the Medium Density Residential (R-2), High Density Residential (R-3), Commercial Downtown (C-2), and Commercial Highway (CH) zones and permit group care facilities as a by-right use in these zones.

Program HE-6.1.5
During the planning period, the City shall monitor State law for amendments to employee and farmworker housing law to ensure ongoing compliance with State law. If State law is amended such that revisions to the City of Yreka’s Zoning Code are necessary for legal compliance, the City will initiate amendments to Title 16 of the Yreka Municipal Code.

Program HE-6.1.6
The City shall update the definition of “family”, Section 16.12.480 of Title 16 – Zoning, Yreka Municipal Code, to be compliant with State law.

Goal HE-7
Development of sites for special needs housing, including the housing needs of persons with disabilities and persons experiencing homelessness to reduce and prevent occurrences of homelessness. Also types of housing opportunities that enable residents to age in place and provide for intergenerational housing. 115
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-22 January 31, 2023
Policy HE-7.1
The City shall amend Title 16, Yreka Municipal Code, to ensure consistency with State law, specifically Government Code Sections 65583(a)(4) et seq, 65650-65656 and 65660-65668, for supportive housing developments, low barrier navigation centers, and emergency shelters. The amendments shall permit supportive housing developments and low barrier navigation centers in zones that permit multifamily and mixed uses including nonresidential zones permitting multifamily uses as by-right development when the statutory requirements are met.

Program HE-7.1.1
1) Consistent with Government Code Section 65650 et seq., the City shall amend the R-2, R-3, RPO, CPO, C-2 CH and CT zones to allow by-right supportive housing developments as a by-right use if the requirements of Government Code Sections 65651 and 65652 are met.
2) Consistent with Government Code Section 65660 et seq., the City shall amend the R-2, R-3, RPO, CPO, C-2 CH and CT zones to allow by-right low barrier navigation centers as a by-right use if the requirements of Government Code Section 65662.
3) The City shall amend the definition of supportive housing, and specifically the definition of “target population”, contained in Yreka Municipal Code Section 16.12.773 to reference the definition of target population contained Government Code Section 65582(i).
4) Pursuant to AB 2162 (2018), the City will amend Section 16.46.160 of the Zoning Code to meet the requirement that management standards are objective and encourage and facilitate the development of, or conversion to, emergency shelters, and are consistent with Government Code Section 65583(a)(4) et seq. 5) The City shall review the adopted parking standards for emergency shelters and determine if the standard is objective, provides sufficient parking to accommodate the staff working in emergency shelters, and does not require more parking for emergency shelters than other residential or commercial uses within the same zone, consistent with AB 139 (2019). If the City finds the adopt parking standards for emergency shelters do not meet the requirements of AB 139, then the City shall prepare amendments to the Title 16.

Timing: Administration: Planning Department
Funding: General Fund
Timing: As part of the City’s comprehensive updates of the General Plan and Zoning Code. Release of Public Draft: Q4 2023; with adoption targeted for 2024.

Policy HE-7.2
The City will amend the Zoning Code to allow small and large group homes as a by-right use in more zoning districts and subject to objective performance and design standards. These amendments will remove regulatory barriers and allow for the development of a range of group and assisted care housing for individuals with disabilities by ensuring appropriate zoning for all ranges of housing from group housing, independent living with services on-site, and institutional care facilities. The City shall allow group care facilities in all residential zones including single-family zones in compliance with Affirmatively Further Fair Housing and applicable Health and Safety Code Sections.

Program HE-7.2.1
The City shall amend Title 16 – Zoning, Yreka Municipal Code for the following and in preparing the amendments, the City may consult the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Group Home Technical Advisory published December 2022.
116
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-23 January 31, 2023
1) Amend Yreka Municipal Code Section 16.12.550 – “Group care home – large” and Section 16.12.552 – “Group care home” – small consistent with state law including Government Code Sections 8899.50 and 65583. 2) Group homes, even homes that have more than six residents, that operate as single-family residences and that do not provide licensable services shall be allowed in single-family neighborhoods, subject only to the generally applicable, nondiscriminatory health, safety, and zoning laws that apply to all single-family residences. 3) Group homes that operate as single-family residences and that provide licensable services to six or fewer residents shall be allowed in single family neighborhoods, subject only to the generally applicable, nondiscriminatory health, safety, and zoning laws that apply to all single family residences. 4) Groups homes operating as single-family residences that provide licensable services to more than six residents as a by-right use in the Medium Density Residential (R-2), High Density Residential (R-3), Commercial Downtown (C-2), and Commercial Highway (CH) zones. Development, performance, and design standards shall be objective, nondiscriminatory health, safety, and zoning laws that apply to all single family and multifamily residences in the same zoning districts.
5) Group homes operating as single-family residences that provide licensable services to more than six residents shall be subject to conditional use permit in the Single-Family Residential (R-1) and Residential Agriculture (R-A) zones, and the conditional use permit findings shall be objective and provide for approval certainty.

Administration: Planning and Building Department
Funding: General Fund
Timing: As part of the City’s update of its General Plan. Release of Public Draft: Q4 2023; with adoption targeted for 2024.

Policy HE-7.3
The City will remove regulatory barriers to encourage conversion or development of single-room occupancy (SRO) units in C-2, CH and CT zones by permitting by-right SROs by-right when objective performance standards for proximity to services are demonstrated.

Program HE-7.3.1
The City shall prepare amendments that would allow by-right SRO development in C-2, CH, and CT zones when located within a distance a person can reasonably walk to services (e.g., a quarter mile), and that meets other applicable zoning requirements for SROs. SROs proposed to be located at a greater walking distance shall be subject to a use permit. All development and performance standards shall be objective.

Administration: Planning and Building Department
Funding: General Fund
Timing: As part of the City’s update of its General Plan. Release of Public Draft: Q4 2023; with adoption targeted for 2024.

Policy HE-7.4
As feasible, the City will support the work of housing providers to address the housing needs of special needs groups (seniors, female headed households, persons with disabilities, persons with developmental disabilities, farmworkers, individuals experiencing homelessness, and persons with extremely low incomes) and will seek to assist in meeting these special housing needs through a combination of regulatory incentives (including those presented in Programs HE-2.1.1,

2.1.2, 2.1.3 and 2.1.6), zoning standards, new housing construction programs, and supportive services programs. 117
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-24 January 31, 2023
Program HE-7.4.1
1) The City will actively support the implementation of the Siskiyou County 10 Year Plan to End Homelessness, specifically goals for increasing the supply of permanent supportive housing and affordable housing, expanding the capacity for housing providers, and expanding options for low barrier emergency shelter and housing. The City will consult with the NorCal Continuum of Care on strategies to provide services, shelter, and housing for those experiencing homelessness in the City.
2) The City shall coordinate and work with Karuk Tribe Housing Authority, Siskiyou County, the NorCal continuum of care, existing nonprofit housing organizations, and partner agencies to develop strategies that address homelessness through a shared vision, coordinated programs, and joint funding opportunities, including identifying and securing funding sources to develop vacant properties and to rehabilitate and convert nonresidential buildings to housing for extremely low income households and special needs households. 3) The City will continue to support the efforts of the housing authorities in administering the Housing Choice Voucher program. (See Program 5.1 for more details).
4) The City will meet with representatives from the Housing Authorities, the NorCal continuum of care, and other nonprofit organizations to provide information on potential sites and housing development proposals that would be appropriate for the use of housing vouchers in conjunction with state or federal new construction or rehabilitation subsidies.

Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund
Timing: Coordination will occur at least annually from 2023 to 2031; the City will apply for funding annually.

Program HE-7.4.2
The City will explore and consider declaring a shelter crisis pursuant to Government Code Section 8698 et seq. and whether the provisions would improve the City’s ability to assist persons experiencing homelessness. Pursuant to Government Code Section 8698(d), a declaration of a shelter crisis “means the duly proclaimed existence of a situation in which a significant number of persons are without the ability to obtain shelter, resulting in a threat to their health and safety.” Some of the benefits of declaring a shelter crisis may include:
• City immunity from liability for ordinary negligence in the provision of emergency housing • provisions of any state or local regulatory statute, regulation, or ordinance prescribing standards of housing, health, or safety are suspended to the extent that strict compliance would in any way prevent, hinder, or delay the mitigation of the effects of the shelter crisis. A city may, in place of such standards, enact municipal health and safety standards to be operative during the housing emergency consistent with ensuring minimal public health and safety.

However, a shelter crisis declaration would new add new responsibilities to the City:
• Annual reporting to the State
• The obligation to develop a plan to address the shelter crisis, including, but not limited to, the development of homeless shelters and permanent supportive housing, as well as onsite supportive services. The plan must also address transitioning residents from homeless shelters to permanent housing. The plan must be developed and made available to the public by July 1 of the year following the shelter crisis declaration.

Another consideration is that the provisions of Government Code Section 8698 et seq. extend only to public facilities, meaning constructed and operating on City-owned or City-lease land which may be a limiting factor. 118
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 2-25 January 31, 2023
Administration: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding: General Fund
Timing: Within 12 months of adoption of the Housing Element Program HE-7.4.3
The City will consider amending the Yreka Municipal Code to allow for the by-right conversion of existing motels and hotels to dwellings configured as multifamily and single room occupancy units that are available for rent, ownership, or mixed tenure.

Administration: Planning Department
Funding: General Fund
Timing: As part of the City’s update of its General Plan. Release of Public Draft: Q4 2023; with adoption targeted for 2024.

Table 2-1:

City of Yreka Housing Element Quantified Objectives, 2023-2031 Extremely
Low Income Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total
New
Construction
20 20 50 150 100 340
Rehabilitation 1 1 2 1 2 7
Preservation 5 10 35 10 0 60
Housing Choice
Vouchers
60 20 20 0 0 100
Totals 86 51 107 161 102 507
119
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 3 - 1 January 2023
Chapter 03 - Analysis of Previous
Housing Element
An important aspect of the Housing Element is an evaluation of achievements under the implementation programs included in the previously adopted Housing Element. The evaluation provides valuable information on the extent to which programs have been successful in achieving stated objectives and addressing local needs and to which these programs continue to be relevant in addressing current and future housing needs in Yreka. The evaluation also provides the basis for recommended modifications to programs and the establishment of new objectives in the Housing Element. While many of the City’s former programs were continued or modified in this update, some were removed due to being successfully implemented and others were added to respond to changes in state law and local conditions.
2014 - 2019 HOUSING PROGRAMS
Of the twenty-one programs included in the prior Housing Element, fifteen are being continued and/or will be modified to provide more effective programs for the current cycle and ensure consistency with State law. The table below provides a summary of each program, its progress, and status for the current update.
120
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 3 - 2 January 2023
Table 3-1
2014-2019 Housing Programs Progress
Program Progress/ Effectiveness Applicability to 2023 – 2031 Housing Element
Program HE.1.1.1: Every year, as part of the annual Housing Element review, the Planning Commission will review the City’s vacant land inventory with the objective of ensuring that Yreka can accommodate a variety of housing types. If a deficiency is found, steps shall be taken to change the General Plan and zoning as needed to increase the amount of available land. The inventory will be made available to the public, especially the development community, for their information and use.

City staff will also update the Planning Commission on the City’s current fee schedule to ensure that the City’s fees are not adding an additional constraint to the development of housing.

In order to increase public input and support of the City’s housing programs, the City will encourage the participation of groups interested in housing in the annual Planning Commission review of the Housing Element. This will occur through public notice and normal contact and solicitation of participation with local agencies and interest groups.

Responsibility: Planning Department
Financing: General Fund
Timing: Annually
Progress:

The City continues to maintain a list of the
available vacant land in the city that is
appropriate to meet its share of regional
housing needs. Additionally, in 2020, the
City received SB2 grant funding to identify
and inventory developable land, vacant
land and underutilized land in the city. This
is currently in progress and will assist in the
production of affordable housing in the
city.

Effectiveness:

City staff report on the Housing Element
progress on an annual basis to the Planning
Commission; this includes an update on
the land inventory. The City gets very few
development requests annually and has
received limited input from local housing
agencies or interest groups.

Continue and modify as per
Programs HE-1.1.1 and HE1.1.2. Program HE-1.1.1
obligates the City to
implement No Net Loss on a
project by project basis.

Program HE-1.1.2 calls on the
City to annually review the
vacant land inventory to
ensure adequacy of sites
suitable for a variety of
residential development.

Program HE.1.2.1: Upon discussions with developers and submittal of residential development plans (included but not limited to developers of large residential subdivisions i.e., 50 or more units), the City will encourage and support those plans which include lower-income housing in areas appropriate to the needs and desires of the population it would house and Progress:

The City received one application for the
construction of 50 lower income housing
units in the planning period (Siskiyou
Crossroads, 2021). The City actively
promotes the construction of new housing
and will process all housing applications.

Continue and modify.

Program HE-2.1.3.3 commits
the City to launch a marketing
campaign to attract property
owners and developers to
improved housing production.
121
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 3 - 3 January 2023
Program Progress/ Effectiveness Applicability to 2023 – 2031 Housing Element
at the same time be convenient to public services. “Encourage and support” as used herein means:
• Consider spreading development fee costs over a 3- to 5-year payment period to help reduce initial impact, at time of project review; • Provide density bonus or other concessions in accordance with Government Code Section 65915;
• Allow phasing of infrastructure whenever possible at time of project review; and
• Any other action on the part of the City which will help to keep development costs to a minimum.

Responsibility: City Manager, Planning Department, Public Works Department
Financing: General Fund
Timing: Continuous, as projects are processed through the Public Works Department and as staff meet with developers looking to build in Yreka Additionally, in 2020 the City received
LEAP grant funding to re-zone property
owned by Siskiyou County to High Density
Residential (HDR). This will assist in the
production of affordable housing in the
city.

Effectiveness: Due to lack of application/
permit activity, there have been limited
opportunities to implement this program.

Program HE.1.2.2: The City will amend the Zoning Ordinance to state that the City allows density bonuses in accordance with the requirements of state density bonus law (Government Code Section 65915). The City will also amend the definition of density bonus to comply with the Government Code requirements.

Responsibility: City Council, Planning Department
Financing: General Fund
Timing: Within one year of Housing Element adoption
Progress:

The Zoning Ordinance was revised in May
2014 in accordance with state density
bonus law.

Effectiveness: This program was
implemented.

Relaunch. State Density
Bonus Law (SDBL) has
received additional
amendments. Program HE2.1.3 directs the City to review current SDBL and update the
City’s local ordinance
accordingly.

Program HE.1.2.3: The City will continue efforts to mitigate the potential loss of extremely low-, very low-, and low-income housing units through the conversion of subsidized rental housing projects to market-rate housing through the following actions:

1. The City will provide information to the property owner of the 46 deedrestricted units that are at risk of converting to market-rate housing on Progress:

The Shadow Gardens property owner has
been in contact with the City and continues
to provide affordable housing through
HUD section 8 vouchers.

Modify and continue. HUD’s
project-based rental
assistance subsidies for 29
units of the Deer Creek
Apartments development will
be expiring in 2023. Program
HE-4.2.1 commits the City to
122
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 3 - 4 January 2023
Program Progress/ Effectiveness Applicability to 2023 – 2031 Housing Element
methods for preserving the lower-income housing by providing incentives or resources, such as working with the Shasta County Housing Authority to target Section 8 vouchers for the units or assist in seeking other funds for improvements.

2. Additionally, when units become at risk, the City shall require that property owners comply with all noticing requirements related to at-risk units, educate tenants about their rights, and contact all potentially interested nonprofits to develop a preservation strategy for the at-risk units.

Responsibility: City Manager
Financing: California Housing Finance Agency Preservation (Help Program), Acquisition Financing Mortgage Insurance for
Purchase/Refinance (HUD), Multifamily Housing Program, CalHFA (preservation acquisition financing).

Timing: Contact property owners of Shadows Garden Apartments during the second half of 2014 to determine future ownership plans; implement preservation strategy if owners indicate desire to sell or convert their properties.

Effectiveness: This program appears
effective: the Shadows Garden Apartments
continues to participate in the HUD section
8 program.
taking actions to prevent the
conversion of these
apartments to market rate
units.

Program HE.1.3.1: Continue to review the effectiveness of the Zoning Ordinance and make revisions if it is found the ordinance is creating unusual constraints on affordability and housing availability.

This will include a review of the conditional use permit process on multifamily applications to determine whether the process is a deterrent to construction of affordable multi-family housing. During the annual report to the Planning Commission, an assessment shall be made of multifamily projects considered during the year. If it is determined that requiring the conditional use permit process is in fact acting as a deterrent to providing affordable housing, the City will reconsider its position on this matter and take the steps necessary to remove any constraints the process may be causing.

Progress:

No multifamily units have been proposed
in the City that required a CUP since the
development of this program (the Siskiyou
Crossroads 50-unit multi-family project did
not require a CUP in compliance with AB2162). Additionally, in 2020, the City received SB2 grant funding to develop
Objective Design Standards for qualifying
multifamily developments. This will assist
in the production of affordable housing in
the city.

Modify. Program HE-1.2.1
directs the City to amend the
Zoning Code all allow
multifamily housing
development with dwelling
groups of five or more units
by-right, removing the
conditional use permit
requirement for this housing
configuration. Additionally,
amend the Zoning Code as
needed such that multifamily
housing development is
123
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 3 - 5 January 2023
Program Progress/ Effectiveness Applicability to 2023 – 2031 Housing Element
Responsibility: Planning Department, Planning Commission Financing: General Fund
Timing: Annually
Effectiveness:

City has received limited proposals for
projects of this type and have not heard it
is a constraint, but additional permitting is
more costly and time consuming. The City
continues to review Zoning Ordinance
effectiveness and will be preparing
multifamily design standards to facilitate
and streamline affordable housing project
review.
subject only to standards that
are objective.

Program HE.1.4.1: Maintain residential zoning districts and development standards that encourage the development of single-family housing products that are affordable to first-time homebuyers, and when feasible, participate in the HOME Program as Notices for Funding Available (NOFAs) are released.

Responsibility: City Manager
Financing: General Fund
Timing: Ongoing; apply for HOME funds as NOFAs are released Progress:

Currently, the City does not have a FirstTime Homebuyers Program. This is primarily due to the lack of interest shown
for this type of program by the public and
limited staff capacity. The City continues to
evaluate the HOME program and monitor
First-Time Homebuyer demand to
establish future need and availability.

Effectiveness: The City reviews all NOFAs,
however there is limited staff to evaluate
when funding is applicable and to be able
to apply for and implement programs.

Continue
Program HE.2.1.1: Review the Reasonable Accommodation procedure and make revisions to provide exceptions in zoning and land use for housing for persons with disabilities. This procedure will be a ministerial process, with a minimal processing fee, subject to approval by the City Manager or his designee applying the following decision-making criteria:
• The request for reasonable accommodation will be used by an individual with a disability protected under fair housing laws.

Progress:

The City adopted a reasonable
accommodations procedure that includes
an express permit program, free building
inspections, and special response to
accessibility complaints that may be
Relaunch. Program HE-6.1.2
obligates the City to review
the existing procedure for
consistency with federal and
state law, prepare
amendments to codify the
124
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 3 - 6 January 2023
Program Progress/ Effectiveness Applicability to 2023 – 2031 Housing Element
• The requested accommodation is necessary to make housing available to an individual with a disability protected under fair housing laws. • The requested accommodation would not impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the City.
• The requested accommodation would not require a fundamental alteration in the nature of the City’s land use and zoning program.

Responsibility: City Manager, Planning Department, Planning Commission Financing: General Fund
Timing: Within one year of Housing Element adoption
necessary to ensure persons with
disabilities have equal access to housing.

Effectiveness: This program was
implemented; to date the City has not
received a reasonable accommodation
request using the adopted procedures,
however.
procedures as part of the
Yreka Municipal Code.

Program HE.2.1.2: In order to facilitate housing for extremely low-income persons, the City will amend the Zoning Ordinance to clarify the definition of single-room occupancy units (SROs), as well as describe specific development standards for these units. SROs will be allowed with a conditional use permit in the C-2 and CH zones.

Responsibility: City Manager, Planning Department
Financing: General Fund
Timing: Within one year of Housing Element adoption
Progress:

The Zoning Ordinance was revised in May
2014 to include this.

Effectiveness: This program was
implemented. There have not been any
inquiries about SROs, however.

Modify. Program HE-7.3.1
commits the City to amending
Title 16 of the Yreka Municipal
Code to allow by-right SRO
development in C-2, CH,
and CT zones when in
proximity to services (e.g.,
a quarter mile), and that
meets other applicable
zoning requirements for
SROs.

Program HE.2.1.3: Pursuant to SB 2 (2007), the City will amend the Zoning Ordinance to include a separate definition of “emergency shelters” consistent with Section 50801 of the California Health and Safety Code.

Further, the City will amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow emergency shelters of 15 beds or fewer by right in the Light Industrial (M1) zone. The Light Industrial zone has sufficient capacity with 50 vacant parcels totaling approximately 460 acres with adjacent sewer and water infrastructure, which is sufficient capacity to address Yreka’s shelter needs for those experiencing homelessness. In addition, the City will evaluate adopting objective development and managerial standards that are consistent with Progress:

The Zoning Ordinance was revised in May
2014 to include portions of this program
related to definitions.

Effectiveness: The City has not yet
adopted development and managerial
standards and will continue to evaluate the
need for these.

Modify and continue.

Programs HE-7.1.1.4 and HE7.1.1.5 call on the City to
update the Zoning Code to
clarify and ensure all
development and
performance standards are
objective. Also, amendments
to the parking regulations to
ensure consistency with AB
125
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 3 - 7 January 2023
Program Progress/ Effectiveness Applicability to 2023 – 2031 Housing Element
Government Code Section 65583(a)(4). Standards that jurisdictions may apply to emergency shelters are limited by state law. Emergency shelter standards may include:
• Lighting
• On-site management
• Maximum number of beds or persons to be served nightly by the facility • Off-street parking based on demonstrated need
• Security during hours that the emergency shelter is in operation Responsibility: City Manager, Planning Department, Planning Commission Financing: General Fund
Timing: Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance will be made one year from the adoption of the 6th cycle Housing Element
139 (2019) for emergency
shelter parking requirements.

Program HE.2.1.4: Pursuant to SB 2 (2007), the City will amend the Zoning Ordinance to include separate definitions of “supportive housing” and “transitional housing” consistent with Sections 50675.14 and 50675.2 of the California Health and Safety Code. The City will also amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow transitional and supportive housing as a residential use subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential uses of the same type in the same zone without undue special regulatory requirements.

Responsibility: City Manager, Planning Department, Planning Commission Financing: General Fund
Timing: Amend Zoning Ordinance within one year of Housing Element adoption
Progress:

The Zoning Ordinance was revised in May
2014 to include this.

Effectiveness: This program has been
completed. However, the Government
Code has been amended with specific
mandates for jurisdictions to allow by-right
qualifying supportive housing
developments.

Completed. However, the
Yreka Municipal Code’s
definition of target population
cross references a section of
the California Health and
Safety Code that has sunset.

Program HE-7.1.1.3 directs the
City to amend the Yreka
Municipal Code to reference
the definition readily located
in Government Code Section
65582(i). Additionally, further
legislation has been enacted
to allow by-right qualifying
supportive housing
developments. Program HE7.1.1 obligates the City to
amend the Yreka Municipal
126
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 3 - 8 January 2023
Program Progress/ Effectiveness Applicability to 2023 – 2031 Housing Element
Code to incorporate these
amendments.

Program HE.2.1.5: In order to help meet the needs of extremely lowincome households, the City will prioritize funding and/or offer financial incentives or regulatory concessions to encourage the development of single-room occupancy units or other units affordable to households with extremely low income. Further, the City will contact qualified developers of low income housing to discuss existing extremely low income housing needs in the City, as well as possible incentives for development of housing.

Objective: Facilitate the development of single room occupancy units or other units deemed affordable to those with extremely low incomes.

Responsibility: City Manager, Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council
Financing: Grant funding
Timing: Meet with housing developers at least twice during the planning period, with incentives ongoing as housing for those with extremely low income is proposed.

Progress:

The City is open to any type of housing
development. The City has researched the
area for non-profit housing developers,
however, the City has not found any that
are considering the development of SROs
in Yreka at this time. The City will continue
to monitor this situation and pursue
development of units affordable to
extremely low income households.

Effectiveness: Due to lack of application/
permit activity, there have been limited
opportunities to implement this program.

Continue
Program HE.2.1.6: Work with housing providers to ensure that special housing needs are addressed for seniors, large families, female-headed households, single-parent households with children, persons with disabilities and developmental disabilities, and homeless individuals and families. The City will seek to meet these special housing needs through a combination of regulatory incentives, zoning standards, new housing construction programs, and supportive services programs. In addition, the City may seek funding under the federal Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS, California Child Care Facilities Finance Program, and other state and federal programs designated specifically for special needs groups such as seniors, persons with disabilities, and persons at risk for homelessness.

Progress:

The City is open to any type of housing
development. In 2021 the City approved
the Siskiyou Crossroads 50-unit mixed
affordable and supportive multi-family
housing project proposed by Rural
Communities Housing Development
Corporation.

Effectiveness: The City has researched
area for non-profit housing developers and
will continue to identify housing providers
and opportunities.

Continue
127
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 3 - 9 January 2023
Program Progress/ Effectiveness Applicability to 2023 – 2031 Housing Element
Objective: Work with housing providers by meeting at least twice during the planning period to discuss special housing needs. Assist, when feasible with funding applications.

Responsibility: City Manager, Planning Department
Financing: Grant funding
Timing: The City will begin researching funding opportunities this year and will meet with housing providers annually beginning in 2015.

Program HE.2.1.7: Continue to allow group care facilities for six or fewer persons in all residential zones including single-family zones in compliance with Health and Safety Code Sections 1267.8, 1566.3, and 1568.08. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow group care facilities for more than six persons by conditional use permit in the Medium Density Residential (R-2), High Density Residential (R-3), Commercial Downtown (C-2), and Commercial Highway (CH) zones. This will allow for the development of a range of assisted care housing for adults who have limited self-care abilities by ensuring appropriate zoning for all ranges of housing from group housing to independent living with services on-site for institutional care facilities. Also to ensure compliance with Health and Safety Code Sections 1267.8, 1566.3, and 1568.08, the amendment will clarify the definitions of “group residential” and “group care facility.” The definition of group care facility must distinguish between facilities for six or fewer persons and for larger facilities for more than six persons. Facilities for six and fewer persons must not be treated differently than other by-right single-family housing uses and may not be required to obtain conditional use permits or variances that are not required of other family dwellings.

Responsibility: Planning Department, Planning Commission Financing: General Fund
Timing: 2014–2015
Progress:

The Zoning Ordinance was revised in May
2014 to include this.

Effectiveness: This program has been
implemented, however modifications are
proposed to make it more effective.

Modify. Program HE-7.2.1
directs the City to amend
Zoning Code to not
differentiate between small
and large group care facilities
in the R-2, R-3, C-2, and CH
zones, and allow by-right
when objective performance
and design standards are met.

Program HE.2.1.8: To comply with the state Employee Housing Act (Health and Safety Code Sections 17021.5 and 17021.6), the City will amend the Zoning Ordinance to treat employee housing that serves six or fewer Progress:

The Zoning Ordinance was revised in May
2014 to include this.

Relaunch. Program HE-2.1.4
calls on the City to amend the
128
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 3 - 10 January 2023
Program Progress/ Effectiveness Applicability to 2023 – 2031 Housing Element
persons as a single-family structure and permitted in the same manner as other single-family structures of the same type in the same zone (Section 17021.5) in all zones allowing single-family residential uses. The Zoning Ordinance will also be amended to treat employee housing consisting of no more than 12 units or 36 beds as an agricultural use and permitted in the same manner as other agricultural uses in the same zone (Section 17021.6) in all zones allowing agricultural uses.

Responsibility: Planning Department, Planning Commission Financing: General Fund
Timing: 2014–2015
Effectiveness: This program has been
completed. However, Section 17021.8 the
Employee Housing Act was amended in
2020.

Zoning Code to allow small
and large employee
housing by-right CPO, C-2,
CH, and CT zones when
located within reasonable
walking to services, and
when objective
development,
performance, and design
standards are met.

Program HE.3.1.1: When feasible, the City will continue to provide loans to homeowners in existing owner-occupied residences, using state and federal subsidies, for the rehabilitation of their property or for the removal and replacement of dilapidated units.

Responsibility: City Manager, Finance Department, Building Department Financing: CDBG, CHFA, HOME, low interest home equity loans offered by the City.

Timing: 2014–2019
Progress:

The City does not currently have a housing
rehabilitation program. The past
rehabilitation program was discontinued
due to a lack of participation and limited
staff capacity and knowledge about
managing the programs. The City is
looking into what the needs are moving
forward and what funding is available.

Effectiveness: This program will be
modified and continued.

Modify and continue per
Program HE-4.3.1.2.

Program HE.3.1.2: Continue to encourage rehabilitation of historic residential structures within the city through Mills Act contracts or other programs, as well as assist in application procedures for the inclusion of structures on the historic register.

Responsibility: Planning Department
Financing: General Fund
Timing: Ongoing, as applications for rehabilitation or for inclusion of structures in the historic register come in
Progress:

The City is unaware of any Mills Act
contracts in the City. No applications for
the inclusion of historic residential
structures on the historic register were
submitted in the planning period (2014-
2019).

Continue and modify to allow
for internal conversions for
multiple units and continue.
129
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 3 - 11 January 2023
Program Progress/ Effectiveness Applicability to 2023 – 2031 Housing Element
Effectiveness: Although no applications
were received, the City will continue to
encourage rehabilitation of historic
residential structures.

Program HE.3.1.3: Utilize the code enforcement program as a means of keeping track of the condition of the city’s housing stock. This, along with periodic review by the Planning Commission and the City Council of residential areas needing improvements, could identify needed code enforcement, necessary improvements to city infrastructure, and/or the opportunity to obtain financing for improvements. As feasible, the City will continue to prioritize code enforcement and provide adequate funding and staffing to support code enforcement programs.

Responsibility: City Manager, Building Department, Planning Department Financing: General Fund
Timing: Ongoing
Progress:

As the City becomes aware of issues
needing attention, they are addressed. The
City has taken action on violations related
to health and safety issues on a case-bycase complaint basis.

Effectiveness: The City has limited funding
and staffing for code enforcement and it is
largely complaint driven; issues are
addressed on a case-by-case basis.

Continue (see Program HE4.3.2.

Program HE.4.1.1: Continue to support the enforcement of the fair housing laws to protect against housing discrimination by providing adequate information about renters’ rights, and promote equal housing opportunity. The City will make information on fair housing available to the public, through the posting of fair housing information in City Hall and in other public buildings, and providing to existing apartment complexes. The City will provide a referral service to those who handle complaints against discrimination. Such complaints are to be filed with the City Manager.

Responsibility: City Manager
Financing: General Fund
Timing: Ongoing
Progress:

Posters from the California Department of
Fair Employment and Housing have been
posted at City Hall to assist those with
discrimination complaints. As complaints
are received, individuals are directed to the
appropriate agency. Although there have
been no formal complaints filed with the
City, the City is periodically contacted
about renter and tenants’ rights and
provides information as applicable.

Effectiveness: This program appears
effective as residents contact the City with
questions.

Continue
130
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 3 - 12 January 2023
Program Progress/ Effectiveness Applicability to 2023 – 2031 Housing Element
Program HE.5.1.1: Continue to support staff efforts to expand on their housing knowledge base. Set aside funds for staff to be involved in classes, conferences, and training opportunities that will ensure that they are up to date on the latest housing and community development trends, strategies, and funding sources. Also, maintain membership and remain on mailing lists for all relevant housing-related state departments and organizations.

Responsibility: Finance Department, City Manager
Financing: General Fund
Timing: Annually, Ongoing
Progress:

The City provides funding for staff to
attend conferences and training sessions as
needed. City staff are on mailing lists with
relevant housing-related state
departments and organizations. There is
no specific budget set aside for training.

Effectiveness: City staff attend trainings
and conferences as feasible and remain on
mailing lists to stay up to date on housing
related matters.

Continue
Program HE.6.1.1: Promote the use of energy conservation measures in all housing through the use of public and private weatherization programs.

Continue to provide information on currently available weatherization and energy conservation programs to residents of the city. The City has information available for the public at the front counter of City Hall and will distribute information through electronic and hard-copy mailings.

Responsibility: Planning Department, Building Department Financing: Private and government funds
Timing: Annually in newsletter and ongoing
Progress:

The City has instituted a citywide
newsletter to disseminate information on
energy conservation programs. Although
this one local weatherization program has
been discontinued, the City wants to keep
and/or find a replacement program.

Additionally, the County air pollution
control district has an existing program for
reduced-cost, efficient wood burning
stoves and provides low cost vouchers for
wood (with funding every couple years).

Effectiveness: This program has been well
used and effective.

Continue
Program HE.6.1.2: Continue to enforce state requirements, including Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, for energy conservation in new residential projects, and encourage residential developers to employ additional energy conservation measures for the siting of buildings, Progress:

The City requires compliance with the
Zoning Ordinance and California Building
Continue as required by State
law.
131
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft 3 - 13 January 2023
Program Progress/ Effectiveness Applicability to 2023 – 2031 Housing Element
landscaping, and solar access through development standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance, Building Code, and Specific Plans as appropriate.

Responsibility: Planning Department, Building Department Financing: General Fund
Timing: Ongoing
Code, including Title 24, to ensure energy
conservation in new residential projects.

Effectiveness: All new units must comply
with Title 24.

Overall effectiveness of the 5th cycle’s goals, policies, and related actions in meeting the housing needs of special needs populations (e.g., elderly, persons with disabilities, large households, female-headed households, farmworkers, and persons experiencing homelessness).

For the duration of the 5th cycle the City did
not have the staff or other resources
available to implement programs that
target the housing needs of special needs
populations. In 2021, the City facilitated
the development of Siskiyou Crossroads on
property owned by Siskiyou County, with a
regional non-profit housing provider
serving as the developer and property
manager. Siskiyou Crossroads is, a 50 unit
multifamily development consisting of a
mix of supportive housing and general lowincome population, with no market rate units.

For the 2023-2031 Housing
Element, the City is
committing general fund
revenues to help fund the
implementation of Housing
Element programs including
programs that address the
housing of special needs
populations.

132
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft January 2023

APPENDIX A

HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
133
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-1 January 31, 2023
APPENDIX A – HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Table of Contents

1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................................... 5

2. Summary of Findings....................................................................................................................................... 6

2.1. Population and Household Characteristics................................................................................................ 6

2.2. Special Needs Housing ............................................................................................................................. 6

2.3. Housing Characteristics ............................................................................................................................ 6

2.4. Housing Constraints ................................................................................................................................. 7

2.4.1. Governmental Constraints ................................................................................................................. 7

2.4.2. Non-Governmental Constraints......................................................................................................... 7

3. Regional Context............................................................................................................................................. 7

3.1. Population Trends..................................................................................................................................... 8

3.2. Household Income and Poverty ...............................................................................................................13

3.2.1. Income Limits ...................................................................................................................................13

3.2.2. Income Levels and Extremely-Low Income Households................................................................... 14

3.2.3. Commute ..........................................................................................................................................17

3.2.4. Employment .................................................................................................................................... 18

3.3. Special Needs.......................................................................................................................................... 20

3.3.1. Elderly and Independent Living Services........................................................................................... 20

3.3.2. Senior Population............................................................................................................................. 21

3.3.3. Persons with Disabilities ................................................................................................................... 22

3.3.4. Persons with Developmental Disabilities.......................................................................................... 23

3.3.5. Female-Headed Households ............................................................................................................ 25

3.3.6. Large Families .................................................................................................................................. 25

3.3.7. Individuals and Families Experiencing Homelessness ....................................................................... 26

3.3.8. Farmworkers .................................................................................................................................... 30

3.4. Housing Composition ..............................................................................................................................33

3.5. Housing Conditions................................................................................................................................. 34

3.5.1. Age of Housing Stock ....................................................................................................................... 34

3.5.2. Occupancy and Tenure......................................................................................................................35

3.5.3. Housing Conditions Survey............................................................................................................... 36

3.5.4. Household Size ................................................................................................................................. 37 134
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-2 January 31, 2023

3.5.5. Overcrowded Housing...................................................................................................................... 38

3.6. Housing Costs......................................................................................................................................... 39

3.6.1. Owner Occupied Housing................................................................................................................. 39

3.6.2. Rental Housing................................................................................................................................. 41

3.6.3. Mobile Housing ................................................................................................................................ 41

3.6.4. Overpayment................................................................................................................................... 41

4. Housing Constraints ...................................................................................................................................... 43

4.1. Governmental......................................................................................................................................... 43

4.1.1. Land Use Controls ............................................................................................................................ 43

4.1.2. Residential Development Standards ................................................................................................ 44

4.1.3. Provisions for a Variety of Housing................................................................................................... 50

4.1.4. Other Locally Adopted Ordinances that Directly Impact the Cost and Supply of Housing................ 63

4.1.5. Water and Sewer Priority ................................................................................................................. 65

4.1.6. Density Bonus .................................................................................................................................. 65

4.1.7. Design Review.................................................................................................................................. 65

4.1.8. Permitting Procedures and Process, Fees, and Times ...................................................................... 66

4.1.9. Building Code and Enforcement........................................................................................................70

4.1.10. Article XXXIV of the California Constitution.....................................................................................71

4.2. Non-Governmental..................................................................................................................................71

4.2.1. Land Costs ........................................................................................................................................71

4.2.2. Construction and Labor Costs ...........................................................................................................72

4.2.3. Availability of Financing ....................................................................................................................72

4.3. Housing Resources and Opportunities .....................................................................................................73

4.3.1. Existing Affordable Housing..............................................................................................................73

4.3.2. Analysis of Assisted Housing Projects at Risk ................................................................................... 74

4.3.3. Loss of Assisted Housing.................................................................................................................. 74

4.3.4. Preservation and Replacement Options............................................................................................75

4.3.5. Resources for Preserving Assisted Rental Housing........................................................................... 76

4.3.6. City of Yreka 6th Cycle RHNA and Housing Element Inventory Future Housing Needs ......................77

4.3.7. Annexations ......................................................................................................................................78

4.3.8. Housing Needs and Vacant Lands .....................................................................................................78

4.3.9. 6th Cycle RHNA ............................................................................................................................... 80

4.4. Funding Sources ..................................................................................................................................... 80

4.5. Opportunities for Energy Conservation .................................................................................................. 80 135
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-3 January 31, 2023
List of Tables
Table A-1 Siskiyou County Population Change, 2000–2020 8 Table A-2 Population Projections, 2010–2060 8
Table A-3 Population by Age, 2000–2019 9
Table A-4 Householder by Age, 2019 10
Table A-5 City of Yreka & Siskiyou County 2010 and 2020 Racial and Ethnic Data 11 Table A-6 Yreka Changes in Household Type, 2010-2020 12 TABLE A-7 2022 State Annual Income Limits, Siskiyou County 14 Table A-8 Yreka Household Income by Household Type, 2021 15 Table A-9 Households by Income Group, 2019 16
Table A-10 Household Income by Tenure, 2010 and 2019 16 TABLE A-11 Tenure by Single- and Multi-Family Occupied Housing Units, 2019 17 TABLE A-12 Travel Time to Work 18
TABLE A-13 Fastest Growing Occupations, 2018–2028 18
Table A-14 Yreka Employment and Median Income by Industry, 2019 20 TABLE A-15 Senior Population, 2000–2019 21
TABLE A-16 Senior Households by Tenure, 2000–2019 22
Table A-17 Yreka Population with a Disability by Age 22 TABLE A-18 Type of Disabilities by Age Group, 2020 23
TABLE A-19 Employment Status for Disabled Persons, 2019 23 TABLE A-20 Residents with Developmental Disabilities by Age 24 TABLE A-21 Residents with Developmental Disabilities by Residence Type 24 TABLE A-22 Female Headed Family Household, 2019 25
TABLE A-23 Female Householders by Children Present and Poverty, 2019 25 TABLE A-24 Large Families (5+ Family Members) by Tenure, 2000–2019 26 Table A-25 Racial and Ethnic Information, 2020 and 2021 PIT Counts, Service Area of Norcal Continuum of Care 27 Table A-26 Gender Information, 2020 and 2021 PIT Counts for Siskiyou County 27 Table A-27 Additional Demographics, 2020 and 2021 PIT Counts for Siskiyou County 28 TABLE A-28 Homelessness Services 29
Table A-29 Hired Farm Labor – State of California and Siskiyou County 31 Table A-30 Farmworkers by Days Worked—State of California and Siskiyou County 31 TABLE A-31 Housing Unit Types, 2010–2021 34
TABLE A-32 Age of Housing Units 34
TABLE A-33 Housing Units by Tenure, 2020 35
TABLE A-34 Occupancy Status, 2000–2019 35
TABLE A-35 Definition of Housing Conditions and 2013 Survey Results 36 TABLE A-36 Household Size by Tenure, 2000–2019 38
Table A-37 Overcrowded Housing, 2000 and 2019 38
TABLE A-38 Overcrowded Housing Summary, 2019 39
Table A-39 Owner-Occupied Housing Unit Value, 2019 39
TABLE A-40 Median Home Sales Price, 2000 and 2021 40
TABLE A-41 Apartment and House Rentals, January 2022 41 136
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-4 January 31, 2023
TABLE A-42 Cost Burdens for All Households, 2019 42
TABLE A-43 Number of Households with Any Housing Problem* 43 Table A-44 Residential Land Use Designations 44
TABLE A-45 Zoning District Development Standards for Residential Uses 44 Table A-46 Summary of Vacant By-Right Parcels 49
TABLE A-47 Zoning District Development Standards for Residential Uses 50 Table A-48 Summary of Vacant Parcels Where Residential Uses Require a Use Permit 50 TABLE A-49 Housing Types Permitted by Zoning District 52 TABLE A-50 Application of SB 9 (2021) Threshold Eligibility Criteria in the City of Yreka 55 TABLE A-51 Municipal Services, Impact, and Connection Fees 68 TABLE A-52 Planning Permit Fees 69
TABLE A-53 Total Processing and Impact Fees for Typical Single- and Multifamily Units 69 TABLE A-54 Planning Processing Times 70
TABLE A-55 Yreka Vacant Land Costs 71
Table A-56 Interest Rates 72
TABLE A-57 Assisted Multifamily Units 73
TABLE A-58 Estimated Rental Subsidies Required 75
TABLE A-59 Regional Housing Needs Allocation City of Yreka RHNA 2022–2030 78 Table A-60 By-Right Sites Available for Residential Development 83 137
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-5 January 31, 2023

1. INTRODUCTION
The Housing Needs Assessment provides a demographic profile of the city by analyzing the following types of information: population trends, household income and poverty, special housing needs, housing characteristics, costs and conditions, constraints to development, and resources and opportunities. Government Code Section 65583(a) requires an assessment of housing needs and an inventory of resources and constraints relevant to the meeting of these needs.

The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) developed a data packet for jurisdictions in Siskiyou County that contains much of the information required for the Housing Needs Assessment of this Housing Element and is the primary source of data for this document. Where additional information is required, the US Census, which is completed every ten years, is the preferred data source, as it provides the most reliable and in-depth data for demographic characteristics of a locality. This report uses the 2020 US Census and the 2019 5-Year American Community Survey (ACS) for current information and the 2010 US Census to track changes since the year 2010. The California Department of Finance (DOF) is another source of valuable data that is more current than the Census. However, the DOF does not provide the depth of information that can be found in the 2020 US Census. Whenever possible, the Siskiyou County data packet, DOF data, and other local sources were used in the Housing Needs Assessment in order to provide the most current profile of the community.

The 2020 US Census did not collect information in several categories that are required for the Housing Needs Assessment. Where this is the case, historical DOF or ACS data is used. Where DOF data is not available, information from the 2010 US Census is retained. In cases where this is not feasible or useful, this assessment references US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) data. The ACS provides estimates of numerous housing-related indictors based on samples averaged over a five-year period. Where the US Census provides complete counts of various demographic indicators, the ACS provides estimates based on statistically significant samples. Due to the small size of the sample taken in Yreka, the estimates reported by the ACS have large margins of error. Where ACS data is used, the numbers should not be interpreted as absolute fact, but rather as a tool to illustrate general proportion or scale. The data presented in the Housing Needs Assessment will not only guide the development of housing goals and policies but will also be integrated into the body of the Housing Element to present the current status of housing and housing-related issues in Yreka. Definitions of the various US Census Bureau terms that are used throughout this document have been included in Appendix C for clarification.

The Housing Needs Assessment is organized into three main sections. The first section focuses on demographic information, such as population trends, ethnicity, age, household composition, income, employment, housing characteristics, general housing needs by income, and housing needs for special segments of the population. This first section outlines the characteristics of the community and identifies those characteristics that may have significant impacts on housing needs in the community.

The second section identifies possible governmental and non-governmental constraints to housing development in Yreka. The City has planning, zoning, and building standards that guide and affect residential development patterns and influence housing availability and affordability. Environmental and housing market conditions also affect the location, availability, affordability, and type of housing that is constructed. The “non-governmental” influences include such factors as the availability and cost of financing, land, and materials for building homes; natural conditions that affect the cost of preparing and developing land for housing; and the business decisions of individuals and organizations in home building, finance, real estate, and rental housing that impact housing cost and availability.
138
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-6 January 31, 2023
The third section identifies the resources and opportunities for affordable housing in the city, which includes an inventory of adequate sites for affordable housing, funding resources, and a description of the current housing programs that work to provide affordable housing to the residents of Yreka.

2. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

2.1. POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Yreka’s population increased by less than one percent between 2010 and 2020 (2020 US Census, 2010 US Census). The city is expected to grow at a slow rate for the duration of the current planning period. According to the 2020 US Census, Caucasians comprise the majority of the city’s residents (72 percent), followed by Hispanic or Latino (12 percent) and American Indian (9 percent).

According to the 2010 US Census and 2015–2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates, the city’s median income for homeowners increased by approximately 11 percent between 2010 and 2019. Income for renter-occupied households increased much higher at 35% which was a large jump from 2000 to 2010 (no change). In 2019, more than half of households had incomes below the low-income ceiling (38 percent) (2015–2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates; HCD 2020). As of December 2021, the unemployment rate was 5.6 percent, which is lower than Siskiyou County’s rate (6.4 percent) but higher than the state’s overall rate (5.0 percent) (California Employment Development Department 2021).

2.2. SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING
Between 2010 and 2019, the 65-74 age group experienced an 18% growth, while those 75 and older decreased by almost 18% resulting in net senior population increase of about 1% (2010 US Census, 2019 ACS). As of 2019, the majority of seniors in Yreka own their homes (71%). Most people living with a disability in the city have a sensory disability (54%). Female-headed households make up 10 percent of all households. Ownership rates appear to have increased since 2010 for larger families, which have an ownership rate of 54 %, up from 38% (2010 US Census, 2019 ACS).

2.3. HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS
The city’s housing stock is mostly single-family and owner-occupied. According to the City’s building permit database, 41 single-family units were built between 2015 and 2021 (an additional 3 single-family units were permitted in 2021); no multi-family units were built during this time frame. Thirty of the 41 single-family residences added are the Karuk Homes #1, an affordable housing development. Approximately 41 percent of the city’s housing stock was built prior to 1970 (2015–2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates). Therefore, based on age alone, it is likely that roughly half of the city’s housing stock needs some form of rehabilitation. However, at the time of the City’s 2013 Housing Conditions Survey, only 41 units were noted as needing more than minor repairs.

Since 2000, the number of total housing units has increased by about 11 percent, while the vacancy rate has increased by approximately 1 percent (2000 US Census, 2015-2019 ACS). Most single-family residential construction has been two-, three-, and four-bedroom units. Most of the overcrowded conditions in the city occur among renter- occupied households, with 1.5 percent of renter households being overcrowded compared to less than 1 percent of owner-occupied households (2015–2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates).

The California Association of Realtors reports that the Siskiyou County median home sales price in October 2021 was $329,500. At the time of the January rental housing costs survey, less than 15 rental units were found 139
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-7 January 31, 2023
available in the city. There were three two-bedroom apartments/houses available for rent for $756 to $1,500 per month and three three-bedrooms available for rent for $862 to $1,250 per month.

2.4. HOUSING CONSTRAINTS

2.4.1. GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
Development standards in the city do not necessarily constrain development, however higher-density multifamily housing types currently require a conditional use permit. Permit processing times are approximately one day to one month to three months and can be as long as nine to twelve when discretionary review is needed.

Projects requiring California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review may take longer than six months. The previous housing element did not consider the discretionary permit, process when required, to be constraint.

This Housing Element, however, identifies the discretionary process to be a constraint to housing production in the City, and is discussed below in section 4.1.2(A). Yreka is presently subject to ministerial streamlining provisions of SB 35 (2017), like many jurisdictions in California. SB 35 allows developers of qualifying housing projects to invoke SB 35’s ministerial streamlining provisions that override the City’s discretionary permitting process while meeting objective development and design standards. To be eligible for SB 35 housing projects must meet provisions for affordability, housing type, site conditions, and labor in order to benefit from the ministerial approval process. At this time Yreka does not have written SB 35 procedures, although City staff is familiar with SB 35 and consults HCD’s Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process Guidelines and other published materials on the State’s website when responding to prospective housing proposals. Program HE-1.3.7 commits Yreka to preparing written procedures and forms, that are consistent with state law, to implement SB 35. As part of Program HE-1.3.7, the City will publish their written procedures on their website, and make all of their SB 35 forms and materials available for download by the public. Yreka will also make their SB 35 procedures and forms available at the Planning Department’s public information counter. Program HE-1.3.7 is to be completed within one year from when the City adopts the housing element.

2.4.2. NON-GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
The availability and cost of housing is strongly influenced by market factors which the City government has little or no control over. State and national economic conditions have a considerable effect on the pace of local development, the availability of financing and mortgage interest rates. A number of costs associated with home building, such as site development (i.e., grading, installation of utilities, constructions of streets, and construction itself) cannot be greatly lessened by the County government. The primary non-governmental constraints to the development of new housing can be broken down into four categories: land costs, site development costs, construction costs, and availability of financing. According to an Internet search conducted in July2022 (survey included www.zillow.com, www.sellingsiskiyou.com, www.realtor.com, and www.richterscalere.com), vacant land prices ranged from $13,770 to $446,028 per acre for land zoned for single-family uses and $128,278 per acre to $271,278 per acre for land zoned for multi- family use. The average construction cost for a 1,500-square-foot single-family home is estimated to be approximately $465,385 (Cost to Build 20221 ).

3. REGIONAL CONTEXT
Yreka is located 25 miles from the Oregon border in central Siskiyou County. It straddles Interstate 5 and is serviced by State Routes 3 and 263. The city is both a rural community and the County seat. The city was founded with the discovery of gold in March 1851, and during the initial eight to nine years of mining, grew from a population of 375 to more than 5,000. Today it is the most populous city in the county with a population of approximately 7,800. The population has fluctuated over the years, but overall growth has been relatively slow and steady. Since 1980, the city has experienced an average annual growth rate of approximately one-half of 1 140
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-8 January 31, 2023
percent. Between 2010 and 2020, the population remained nearly static, growing approximately one-half of 1 percent over the ten years (see Table A-1). With growing industries in the area, the main growth limiting factor in the region is likely the availably of affordable homes.

Table A-1
Siskiyou County Population Change, 2000–2020
City 2000
Population
2010
Population
Percentage
Change
2000-2010
2020
Population
Percentage
Change
2010-2020
Yreka 7,290 7,765 7% 7,807 0.5%
Fort Jones 660 839 27% 695 -20.7%
Etna 781 737 -6% 678 -8.7%
Montague 1,456 1,443 -1% 1,226 -17.7%
Dorris 886 939 6% 860 -9.2%
Tulelake 1,020 1,010 -1% 902 -12.0%
Weed 2,978 2,967 0% 2,862 -3.7%
Mt. Shasta 3,621 3,394 -6% 3,223 -5.3%
Dunsmuir 1,923 1,650 -14% 1,707 3.3%
Unincorporated 23,686 24,156 2% 24,116 -0.2%
Source: 2000, 2010, 2020 U.S. Decennial Census.

3.1. POPULATION TRENDS
The population of Yreka increased 8 percent from 7,290 in 2000 to 7,807 in 2020, which represents an annual growth rate of less than 1 percent since 2000. Although this growth is considerably lower than is typical of California’s more urbanized centers, it is fairly common for rural Siskiyou County.

Population projections for Yreka are not currently available. The DOF provides projections for the unincorporated area and all the cities through 2060. Table A-2 shows the expected population for both the incorporated and unincorporated portions of Siskiyou County from 2010 to 2060. Based on DOF projections, the county is expected to experience an annual growth rate of less than three-tenths of 1 percent through 2060. Based on the city’s historic growth rate and the current housing crisis throughout the state, it is likely that Yreka’s future growth rate will resemble the growth rate projected for Siskiyou County.

Table A-2
Population Projections, 2010–2060
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
SiskiyouCounty 44,893 44,076 48,883 51,854 52,130 52,646 Source: DOF, Report P-3: State and County Population Projections by Race/Ethnicity, Detailed Age, andGender, 2010–2060, 2021 The distribution of Yreka’s population by age group is shown in Table A-3. Although the absolute number of residents changed for each category between 2000 and 2019, the proportion of most age categories remained relatively static. The largest changes were ages 25-34 which increased from 9% to 16%. The second largest 141
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-9 January 31, 2023
change was a decrease in ages 45-54 from 14% to 8% proportionately. Table A-4 reports age by householder, which is another way of illustrating how age is distributed in the city. The majority of renters are between 25 and 44 years old, while most owners are between 65 and 74 years old.

Table A-3
Population by Age, 2000–2019
Age 2000 2010 2019*
Persons Percentage Persons Percentage Persons Percentage <5 404 6% 592 8% 608 8.0%
5–14 1,068 15% 972 13% 1,111 14.7%
15–24 953 13% 985 13% 726 9.6%
25–34 676 9% 814 10% 1,217 16.1%
35–44 1,039 14% 789 10% 945 12.5%
45–54 1,013 14% 1,076 14% 597 7.9%
55–64 724 10% 1,043 13% 844 11.2%
65+ 1,413 19% 1,494 19% 1,514 20.0%
Total 7,290 100% 7,765 100% 7,562 100%
Source: 2000, 2010 US Census, Table P12; 2015-2019 ACS, Table DP05 Figure 1: Yreka Population by Age
142
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-10 January 31, 2023
Table A-4
Householder by Age, 2019
Householder Type Number Percentage of
Total
Owner-Occupied 1,998 59%
Householder 15 to 24 years 10 0%
Householder 25 to 34 years 321 9%
Householder 35 to 44 years 220 6%
Householder 45 to 54 years 255 7%
Householder 55 to 59 years 239 7%
Householder 60 to 64 years 116 3%
Householder 65 to 74 years 495 15%
Householder 75 to 84 years 266 8%
Householder 85 years and over 76 2%
Renter-Occupied 1,404 41%
Householder 15 to 24 years 194 6%
Householder 25 to 34 years 256 8%
Householder 35 to 44 years 265 8%
Householder 45 to 54 years 153 4%
Householder 55 to 59 years 85 2%
Householder 60 to 64 years 107 3%
Householder 65 to 74 years 213 6%
Householder 75 to 84 years 92 3%
Householder 85 years and over 39 1%
Total 3,402 100%
Source: 2015-2019 ACS
Table A-5 shows the racial and ethnic composition of the City of Yreka alongside the same data for Siskiyou county. Persons who identify as White, non-Hispanic--Latino comprise nearly 86 percent of the City’s population; persons who are Hispanic or Latino are the next largest ethnic group comprising 12.3 percent of the City’s population. Persons who are Native Americans are the next largest racial group at almost 10 percent of the population. The number of persons in these three racial and ethnic groups increased from 2010 to 2020 in the City. As a percentage of the population, Siskiyou county’s racial and ethnic composition is similar. Siskiyou county also saw similar population increases for these same groups. The City saw a greater increase in the number of Native Americans in comparison to the Siskiyou county. 143
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-11 January 31, 2023
Table A-5
City of Yreka & Siskiyou County 2010 and 2020 Racial and Ethnic Data City of Yreka Siskiyou County
2010 % 2020 % ’10-’20 ∆ 2010 % 2020 % ’10-’20 ∆
Total 7,765 100% 7,807 0.5% 44,900 100% 44,207 -1.5%
Hispanic or Latino 753 9.7% 958 12.3% 27% 4,615 10.3% 5,527 12.5% 20% Not Hispanic or Latino 7,012 90.3% 6,849 87.7% -2% 40,285 89.7% 38,549 87.2% -4% Population of One Race: 6,649 85.6% 6,192 79.3% -7% 38,445 85.6% 35,454 80.2% -8% White Alone 6,078 78.3% 5,314 85.8% -13% 35,683 79.5% 32,057 90.4% -10.2% Black or African American 53 0.7% 66 1.1% 25% 552 1.2% 471 1.3% -15% American Indian and Alaska Native 413 5.3% 616 9.9% 49% 1,549 3.4% 1,757 5% 13% Asian Alone 90 1.2% 147 2.4% 63% 528 1.2% 866 2.4% 64%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific
Islander 8 0.1% 10 0.2% 25% 69 0.2% 38 0.1% -45%
Some Other Race 7 0.1% 39 0.6% 457% 64 0.1% 265 0.8% 314% Population of Two Races 321 4.1% 612 8.4% 91% 1,840 4.1% 2,894 6.6% 69% White; Black or African American
26 8.1% 47 7.7% 81% 153 8.9% 262 9.1% 71%
White; American Indian and Alaska
Native 225 70.1% 402 65.7% 78% 1,196 69.8% 1,708 59% 43% White; Asian 40 12.5% 58 9.5% 45% 186 10.9% 277 9.6% 49% White; Some Other Race 5 1.6% 77 2.3% 1440% 50 2.9% 466 16.1% 832% White; Native Hawaiian and Other
Pacific Islander 3 0.9% 14 12.6% 367% 22 1.3% 79 2.7% 259% All Other 22 6.9% 14 2.3% -36% 107 6.2% 102 3.5% -4.7%
Population of Three or More Races 42 0.5% 45 0.6% 7% 126 0.3% 201 0.5% 59.5% Source: 2010 and 2020 US Census, Table P2
144
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-12 January 31, 2023
Table A-6
Yreka Changes in Household Type, 2010-2020
Household Type 2010 2020 % Change From
2010 to 2020
Number Percentage Number Percentage
Household Populations2
Total Households 3,360 100 3,407 100 1.4
Average Household Size 2.44 2.21 (19.4)
Family Households (families) 1,970 58.6 1,763 51.7 (10.5) Average Family Size 2.91 3.04 4.5
Married-Couple Families 1,281 65.0 1,195 67.8 (6.7)
With Children 494 38.6 482 40.3 (2.4)
FemaleHouseholder,no spouse 591 30 365 20.7 (38.2)
With Children 378 64 260 71.2 (31.2)
Male Householder, no spouse 98 5.0 203 11.5 107.1
With Children 32 32.7 149 73.4 366
Non-Family Households 1,390 41.4 1,644 48.3 18.3
Group Quarters (Non-Household Population)
City of Yreka 149 50 (66)
Siskiyou County 950 566 (40)
Sources: American Community Survey, 2010 and 2020, Table S1101 and Table B26001. Negative values are shown in parathesis.

The American Community Survey (ACS) 2010 and 2020 data for household types including group quarters are presented in Table A-6. The data indicates changes in family and non-family households in Yreka from 2010 to 2020. A family household consists of a householder and who are living in the home and who are related to the householder by birth, marriage or adoption. A non-family household consists of the householder living alone or the home is occupied exclusively by unrelated people. People who are not living in housing units are living in group quarters of which there are two types: institutional and non-institutional. Correctional facilities and nursing homes are examples of institutional group quarters. College dormitories, military barracks, group homes, and shelters are examples of non-institutional group quarters.

The 2010 and 2020 ACS data presented in Table A-6 indicates while the total number of households increased

1.4 percent from 2010 to 2020, the total number of family households decreased by 10.5 percent from 2010 to 2020, while the non-family households increased more than 18 percent in the same period. The average household size decreased from 2.44 to 2.21 persons, or more than 19 percent. These data indicate a greater number of people are living with smaller households and possible increase in the number of householders living alone from 2010 to 2020.
145
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-13 January 31, 2023
The total number single-parent households was nearly identical in 2010 and 2020: 410 and 409. From 2010 to 2020, the number of female householders (no spouse) no children decreased nearly 40 percent, the number of male householders (no spouse) no children increased 107 percent. Although there was a decline in the number of female householders with children, the percentage female householders (no spouse) with children increased relative to female householders without children: 64 precent in 2010 to 71 percent in 2020. The most dramatic changes are reported for mail householders (no spouse) with children: In 2020, 75 percent of male householders, no spouse, had children, whereas in 2010, nearly 33 percent of male householders, no spouse, had children. however, increased significantly from 2010. Single parent households, particularly female-headed households, generally have lower-incomes and higher living expenses, often making the search for affordable, decent, and safe housing more difficult. In addition to difficulties faced by these households in finding and maintaining affordable housing, these households also typically have additional special needs relating to access to day care/childcare, health care and other supportive services.

Group quarterfacilities are living situation where people live or stay that is not a housing unit, (house, apartment, mobile home, rented rooms). There are two types of group quarters institutional and non-institutional. Examples of institutional group quarters are correctional facilities, nursing homes, or mental hospitals. College dormitories, military barracks, group homes, missions or shelters are examples of non- institutional group quarter. According to the most recent American Community Survey, from 2010 to 2020, both Yreka and Siskiyou county saw a decrease in the population residing in group quarters, with Yreka having the larger decrease: Yreka’s population in group quarters decreased from 149 persons in 2010 to 50 individuals in 2020. Local changes are consistent with the overall trend for California where the total population in group quarters decreased overall from an estimated population of 826,697 individuals to 824,735 individuals in 2020.

3.2. HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND POVERTY
Yreka and Siskiyou county have relatively low income levels in comparison California. Both Siskiyou county and Yreka are considered a low-income community because both have a median income that is 80 percent or less of the 2022 statewide median income of $78,672. For housing to be affordable it must within a household’s budget.

3.2.1. INCOME LIMITS
The State of California publishes annual income limits for each county that are used to determine eligibility for assisted housing programs within that county. The California Health and Safety Code requires that the state limits for the low-, very low-, and extremely low-income categories will be the same as those in the equivalent levels established by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for its Section 8 program.

HCD calculates the 2022 area median income (AMI) for Siskiyou county to be $80,300. Table A-7 below presents the 2022 State income limits for Siskiyou county by household size. 146
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-14 January 31, 2023
Table A-7
2022 State Annual Income Limits, Siskiyou County
Income Category
Number of Persons in Household
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Extremely Low Income
(<30% of AMI) $16,350 $18,700 $23,030 $27,750 $32,470 $37,190 $41,910 $46,630 Very Low Income (30-
50% of AMI) $27,300 $31,200 $35,100 $38,950 $42,100 $45,200 $48,300 $51,450 Low Income (50-80%
of AMI) $43,650 $49,850 $56,100 $62,300 $67,300 $72,300 $77,300 $82,250 Median Income $56,200 $64,250 $72,250 $80,300 $86,700 $93,150 $99,550 $106,000 Moderate Income (80-
100% AMI) $67,450 $77,100 $86,700 $96,350 $104,050 $111,750 $119,450 $127,200 Above Moderate
Income* (>100% AMI) $68,002 $77,743 $87,423 $97,163 $104,907 $112,712 $120,456 $128,260 “AMI” = area median income, which was $80,300 for Siskiyou County according to HCD’s 2022 publication. * Above Moderate Income values are calculated as 121% of median income.

Source: HCD 2022, https://www.hcd.ca.gov/docs/grants-and-funding/inc2k22.pdf

3.2.2. INCOME LEVELS AND EXTREMELY-LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS Extremely Low-Income (ELI) households are those that earn 30 percent of the area median income or less. In Yreka this amounts to an annual income of $16,350 for an individual and $27,750 for a family of four, as indicated in Table A-7 above. Many ELI households live in rental housing and are more likely to be cost burdened, and face overcrowding and substandard housing conditions, and are at risk for displacement. Some ELI households are recipients of public assistance such as social security insurance or disability insurance. Housing types available and suitable for ELI households include affordable rentals, accessory dwelling units, permanent supportive housing, transitional housing, and emergency shelters. During much of the City’s 5th cycle, housing production for all income categories was low. The City also faced staffing difficulties which diminished the effectiveness of many of the City’s 5th cycle programs including those aimed at facilitating production of ELI housing. More recently, however, the City has actively supported and facilitated two affordable housing developments within city limits: Siskiyou Crossroads, a 100 percent assisted development with supportive housing units, and Karuk Home 1, a Karuk Tribe Housing Authority project.

Table A-8 summarizes Yreka's by income and household type, and Table A-10 summarizes Yreka households by income and tenure. As shown in Table A-8, 10.2 percent of nonfamily households make less than $10,000 each year and 15.3 percent earn between $10,000 and $14,999. Based on the ELI threshold of $16,350 for households of one, these households can be considered extremely low income. Because the ELI threshold for a family of four ($27,750) falls between income categories in the data, not all family households making $27,750 or less can be considered extremely low income, although 15.1 percent of families make less than $25,000. This results in the actual cost of housing, both ownership and rentals, oftentimes being financially burdensome for many 147
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-15 January 31, 2023
households. Cost burdened is defined as households pay more than 30 percent of their gross household income toward housing, and households paying more than 50 percent of their gross income are severely cost burdened.

Cost burdened households are more likely to face overcrowding.

Table A-8
Yreka Household Income by Household Type, 2021
Total Households Families
Nonfamily
households
Total 3,210 1,703 1,507
Less than $10,000 6.3% 2.8% 10.2%
$10,000 to $14,999 8.6% 3.2% 15.3%
$15,000 to $24,999 15.0% 9.1% 21.7%
$25,000 to $34,999 8.0% 8.4% 9.0%
$35,000 to $49,999 16.9% 18.0% 16.3%
$50,000 to $74,999 15.0% 19.4% 12.5%
$75,000 to $99,999 9.2% 12.4% 6.6%
$100,000 to $149,999 11.9% 15.6% 5.2%
$150,000 to $199,999 6.9% 6.8% 3.1%
$200,000 or more 2.3% 4.3% 0.0%
Source: 2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates, Table S1901
Table A-9 illustrates similar data to Table A-8, but shows the number of households in each income group based on 2015–2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates. Over ten percent of all households fall into the extremely low-income category. Approximately 58 percent of the city’s households have incomes at or below the low-income limit.

The remaining 43 percent of households have incomes above the low-income limit (8 percent of households earn incomes that fall into the moderate-income category; 35 percent of households fall into the above moderate-income category).
148
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-16 January 31, 2023
Table A-9
Households by Income Group, 2019
Income Group Income Households %
Extremely Low (Below 30% of Median Income) <$12,745 445 13% Very Low (30–50% of Median Income) $12,745–$21,242 239 7% Low (50–80% of Median Income) $21,242–$33,987 598 18%
Moderate (80–10% of Median Income) $33,987–$50,980 667 20% Above Moderate (Over 120% of Median
Income) >$50,980 1,453 43%
Total Households 3,402
Source: Estimates are based on 2015-2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates.

Table A-10 illustrates the income distribution in 2010 and 2019 by tenure. This data indicates that owneroccupied households earned about 55 percent more than of renter-occupied households in 2019, or $53,611 and $29,662, respectively. Although the median renter household income increased by nearly $10,000 from 2010, this is only $1,912 greater than the extremely low income limit for a household of four as presented in Table A-7 above.

Table A-10
Household Income by Tenure, 2010 and 2019
Income
2010 2019
Households Percentage
of Total Households Percentage of Total
Owner-Occupied Households
Less than 10,000 86 5% 141 4%
$10,000 to $14,999 165 5% 131 4%
$15,000 to $19,999 111 3% 26 1%
$20,000 to $24,999 57 2% 68 2%
$25,000 to $34,999 199 6% 178 5%
$35,000 to $49,999 265 8% 424 12%
$50,000 to $74,999 255 8% 343 10%
$75,000 to $99,999 270 8% 272 8%
$100,000 or more 242 7% 415 12%
Total Owner-Occupied 1,650 52% 1,998 59%
Renter-Occupied Households
Less than 10,000 241 7% 123 4%
$10,000 to $14,999 387 12% 195 6%
$15,000 to $19,999 205 6% 107 3%
$20,000 to $24,999 93 3% 153 4%
$25,000 to $34,999 140 4% 180 5%
$35,000 to $49,999 205 6% 222 7%
149
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-17 January 31, 2023
Income
2010 2019
Households Percentage
of Total Households Percentage of Total
$50,000 to $74,999 185 6% 239 7%
$75,000 to $99,999 104 3% 57 2%
$100,000 or more 18 1% 128 4%
Total Renter-Occupied 1,578 48% 1,404 41%
Median Income - Owners $47,718 $53,611
Median Income - Renters $19,281 $29,662
Source: 2010 US Census, Summary File 3; 2015–2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates, Table S2503 As presented in Table A-42 below, 25 percent of households who own their own are cost burdened and 57 percent rent households are cost burdened. ELI households have the highest cost burden: nearly 80 percent of ELI households who own their home are pay more than 30 of their gross income towards housing, and nearly 85 of renter households are cost burdened.

A. ELI Household Housing Need Projection
As discussed below in Section 4.3.9, Yreka’s 6th cycle RHNA is for two housing units: one low income unit and one very low income unit. As required by statute, at least 50 percent of a jurisdiction’s very low income RHNA must be categorized as ELI. In addition to the one low income unit and one very low income unit, City assigns itself one (1) ELI unit, resulting in a total of three (3) units for its 6th cycle RHNA.

Table A-11 illustrates the tenure by housing unit type in the year 2019. The majority of owner-occupied households occupied single-family housing units; the majority of renter-occupied households occupied multifamily housing units.

Table A-11
Tenure by Single- and Multi-Family Occupied Housing Units, 2019 Unit Type Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Total
Single-Family 1,770 544 2,314
Multi-Family 8 821 829
MobileHome 220 39 259
Total 3,402
Source: 2019 2015-2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates

3.2.3. COMMUTE
Commute distance is an important factor in housing availability and affordability and is also an indicator of jobs/housing balance. Communities with extended commute distances generally have a poor jobs/housing balance, while those with short average commutes tend to have a strong jobs/housing balance. The burden of the additional costs associated with extended commuting disproportionately affects lower-income households who must spend a larger portion of their overall income on fuel. This in turn affects a household’s ability to occupy decent housing without being overburdened by cost. Table A-12 indicates that the vast majority of Yreka residents travel less than 30 minutes from home to work. This data indicates that many of the jobs are within 20 miles of the city and that there is a strong jobs/housing balance, meaning that the available jobs are within relatively close distance to the employees’ places of residence. 150
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-18 January 31, 2023
Table A-12
Travel Time to Work
Travel Time to Work Number Percentage
Less than 30 minutes 2,429 88%
30 to 59 minutes 287 10%
60 or more minutes 43 2%
Total 2,759 100%
Source: ACE 2015-2019 Five-Year Estimates

3.2.4. EMPLOYMENT
The region’s fastest growing occupations are listed in
Table A-12. This information is only available for the
Northern Counties Region, not for Yreka, but is
applicable because Yreka residents work both inside and outside of the city. According to HCD, the 2019 Siskiyou County median income for a family of four is $65,579. Of the ten fastest growing occupations, only two have a
median hourly wage that is on par with the county’s
median hourly wage, construction managers and medical
and health services managers. Figure 2 identifies the
county’s largest employers by city which employ at least 100 people, and Table A-13 presents employment and
median income by industry, which is an aggregated
version of the finer scaled occupation data presented in Table A-12.

Table A-13
Fastest Growing Occupations, 2018–2028
Occupation
Median
Hourly
Wage*
Estimated
Employment Percentage
Change
2018 2028
Construction Managers $52.59 440 530 20%
Medical and Health Services Managers $64.86 240 320 33% Market Research Analysts and Marketing Specialists $25.00 190 230 21% Substance Abuse, Behavioral Disorder, and Mental Health Counselors $22.56 320 390 22%
Medical Assistants $19.99 400 470 18%
Cooks, Restaurant $17.01 1,020 1,250 23%
Animal Caretakers $16.37 200 240 20%
• Fairchild Medical Clinic
• Fairchild Medical Center
• Nor-Cal Products Inc
• Raley's
• Siskiyou County Public Works
• Walmart Supercenter
Source: City of Yreka
Figure 2: Yreka's Largest Employers,
151
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-19 January 31, 2023
Industrial Machinery Mechanics $27.47 250 300 20%
Source: Siskiyou County Profile, State of California Employment Development Department, accessed 2021. * 2021 Q1 Mean Hourly Wage from Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) Survey Results. 152
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-20 January 31, 2023
Table A-14
Yreka Employment and Median Income by Industry, 2019
Industry Employed Percent Median
Income
Educational services, and health care and social assistance 766 26% $39,792 Retail trade 269 9% $20,076
Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation and food services 345 12% $12,422
Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 140 5% $86,250 Public administration 260 9% $52,167
Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing 122 4% $30,455 Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative and waste management services 265 9% $28,194
Other services, except public administration 143 5% $24,450 Construction 99 3% $38,125
Manufacturing 219 7% $32,734
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining 209 7% $39,250 Wholesale trade 100 3% $28,988
Information 61 2% $46,406
Civilian employed population 16 years and over 2,998 100% $32,243 Source: 2015-2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates

3.3. SPECIAL NEEDS

3.3.1. ELDERLY AND INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES The City of Yreka financially and politically supports the Madrone Hospice, Inc., which provides senior services, and Siskiyou County Health and Human Services to provide residents that are over the age of 65 years old with food security, health, and social services. These services are provided at the Yreka Community Center through senior lunches, Siskiyou County Health and Human Services facility on Main Street, and remotely to individuals who are unable to leave their homes due to medical condition or inability to drive or walk.

Elderly residents can participate in fresh, cooked meals delivered to their doorstep through the Senior Nutrition, Transportation, and Family Caregiver Support Programs. The Madrone program has not provided congregate dining since the advent of the pandemic but will begin those services again once COVID has further subsided due to the vulnerable nature of our elderly residents. In addition to food programs, Madrone provides seniors with information and programs on caregivers, community services, education on senior specific topic areas, handicap ramp installation, and transit options. 153
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-21 January 31, 2023
Siskiyou County Health and Human Services provides county and city residents with healthcare and social services. The county provides adult protection services, in-home supportive services, public guardians, and administrators of estates. These services allow residents to live independently of an assisted living facility and helps guardians caring for elderly or individuals unable to live independently.

Dutra’s Guest House (RCFE License)
Barker’s Residential Care
A Touch of Home
Meadowlark Assisted Living & Memory Care Community
Shepherd of God Assisted Living LLC
Care “n” Hearts, Inc.

Shasta View Nursing Center
Eskaton President G. Washington
Shasta Manor I and II
Laurel Crest Manor Residential Care
Rockfellow House

3.3.2. SENIOR POPULATION
Table A-15 illustrates the population of residents aged 65 and older in 2000, 2010, and 2019. The proportion of retirement-age residents aged 65 to 74 and 75 and older remained nearly constant between 2000 and 2010 but changed slightly in 2019. From 2010 to 2019 there was an 18% increase in seniors aged 65-74, while seniors aged 75 and over decreased by 18%.

Table A-15
Senior Population, 2000–2019
Age Group
2000 2010 2019
Persons Percentage Persons Percentage Persons Percentage 65 to 74 years 615 44% 692 46% 962 64%
75 and over 798 56% 802 54% 552 36%
Total Seniors 1,413 100% 1,494 100% 1,514 100%
Source: 2000 US Census, 2010 US Census, 2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates Table A-16 illustrates the tenure of senior households in the city. The majority of senior households own their homes. The proportion of owner-occupied and renter-occupied senior households has been remained relatively consistent since 2000.
154
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-22 January 31, 2023
Table A-16
Senior Households by Tenure, 2000–2019
2000 2010 2019
Households Percentage Households Percentage Households Percentage Owner-Occupied
65 to 74 years 275 27% 295 32% 495 42%
75 years and older 461 45% 332 35% 342 29%
Total Owner-Occupied 736 72% 627 67% 837 71%
Renter-Occupied
65 to 74 years 86 9% 131 14% 213 18%
75 years and older 196 19% 175 19% 131 11%
Total Renter-Occupied 282 28% 306 33% 344 29%
Total Senior Households 1,018 100% 933 100% 1,181 100%
Source: 2000 US Census, 2010 US Census, 2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates

3.3.3. PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
Based on a total population estimate of 7,559 persons for the City of Yreka, 19 percent residents are experiencing a disability. Table A-17 indicates the largest age group of noninstitutionalized persons with disabilities are 65 years and older, comprising 39 percent of the City’s total population. For persons with disabilities Table A-18 provides information about the types of challenges and difficulties that may require accommodation and accessible features in dwellings, such as wheelchair ramps, special doorbells, roll-in showers, high-set toilets, or other adaptive devices or medical equipment.

Table A-17
Yreka Population with a Disability by Age
Total Population
With a Disability
% of Tl. Population
Under 18 years (0-17) 1,938 26% 173 12% 9%
18-64 years 3,946 52% 600 42% 15%
65 Years & Older 1,675 22% 660 46% 39%
Total 7,5593 100% 1,433 100% 19%
2020 ACS 5-Year Estimates Subject Tables Table S1810
Table A-18 indicates the most common disabilities of Yreka residents are hearing and vision, and these are most likely to occur for residents who are 65 and older. It is noted that Table A-4 reports that the number of residents 65 and older in Yreka increased from 2000 to 2019. Fifty-three percent of the 65 and older Yreka population also experiences ambulatory difficulties. Table A-3 and Figure 1 also show that persons who are 65 and older are the largest age group in the City’s, and Table A-4 also reports that persons who are 65-75 are most likely to own and live in their home. While the City updated its reasonable accommodation procedures as part of the previous 155
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-23 January 31, 2023
housing element, to ensure the procedures comport with current federal and state law, Program HE-6.1.2 commits the City to undertaking a review and initiating any needed updates, and the following activities:
• Codifying the procedures so they are made part of the Zoning Code, • Inclusion of language that reasonable accommodation extends and applies to the City’s parking regulations.
• Inclusion of language that providers of housing for persons with disabilities may request reasonable accommodation.
• Developing and marketing the availability of the procedures on a regular basis According to Table A-17 and Table A-18, persons in the 18-64 age group who have disabilities make up 15 percent of the City’s population, and this group is most likely to experience independent living difficulty, followed by cognitive difficulty. Table A-19 reports employment status for persons who are of working age, i.e., between the ages of 16 and 64, and who have a disability. The American community Survey data indicates that most members of this population are employed.

Table A-18
Type of Disabilities by Age Group, 2020
Type Total
Count
Under 18 years
(0-17) 18-64 years 65 Years & Older
With Hearing-Vision Difficulties 738 7% 25% 67%
With a Cognitive Difficulty 609 26%* 47% 27%
With an Ambulatory Difficulty 641 6%* 41% 53%
With a Self-Care Difficulty 186 24%* 35% 41%
With an Independent Living Difficulty 479 n/a 66% 34%
Source: 2020 ACS Five-Year Estimates, Table S1810
* For cognitive difficulty, ambulatory difficulty, and self-care difficulty, the “Population under 18 years” excludes children under 5 years of age in these measures.

Table A-19
Employment Status for Disabled Persons, 2019
Employment Status Working-Age Residents with a
Disability (16 to 64 years old)
Employed 164
Not Employed 54
Source: 2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates

3.3.4. PERSONS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
Senate Bill (SB) 812 requires the City to include the needs of individuals with a developmental disability within the community in the special housing needs analysis. According to Section 4512 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, a “developmental disability” means a disability that originates before an individual attains age 18 years, continues, or can be expected to continue, indefinitely, and constitutes a substantial disability for that individual which includes intellectual disabilities, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and autism. 156
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-24 January 31, 2023
Many persons with developmental disabilities can live and work independently in a conventional housing environment. Individuals with more severe disabilities require a group living environment where supervision is provided. The most severely affected individuals may require an institutional environment where medical care and physical therapy are provided. Because developmental disabilities exist before adulthood, the first issue in supportive housing for persons with developmental disabilities is the transition from the person’s living situation as a child to an appropriate level of independence as an adult.

The California Department of Developmental Services (DDS) currently provides community-based services to approximately 243,000 persons with developmental disabilities and their families through a statewide system of 21 regional centers, four developmental centers, and two community-based facilities. The Far Northern Regional Center is one of 21 regional centers in California that provides point of entry to services for persons with developmental disabilities. The center is a private, nonprofit community agency that contracts with local businesses to offer a wide range of services to individuals with developmental disabilities and their families.

Table A-19 provides information about Yreka’s population of persons with developmental disabilities and Table A-20 provides information about their place of residence.

Table A-20
Residents with Developmental Disabilities by Age
Zip
Code
0–17
Years
18+
Years Total
96097 58 95 153
Source: Siskiyou County 6th Cycle Housing Element Data Packet, 2019 Table A-21
Residents with Developmental Disabilities by Residence Type Zip
Code
Community
Care
Home
Parent/Guardian
Independent
Living Other Total
96097 0 93 57 <11 >150
Source: Siskiyou County 6th Cycle Housing Element Data Packet, 2019 A number of housing types are appropriate for people living with a development disability: rent-subsidized homes, licensed and unlicensed single-family homes, inclusionary housing, Section 8 vouchers, special programs for home purchase, HUD housing, and SB 962 homes. The design of housing, e.g., accessibility modifications, the proximity to services and transit, and the availability of group living opportunities represent some of the types of considerations that are important in serving this need group. Incorporating barrier-free design in all new multi-family housing (as required by California and federal fair housing laws) is especially important to provide the widest range of choices for disabled residents. Special consideration should also be given to the affordability of housing, as people with disabilities may be living on a fixed income.

In order to assist in the housing needs for persons with developmental disabilities, the City will implement programs to coordinate housing activities and outreach with the Far North Regional Center and encourage housing providers to designate a portion of new affordable housing developments for persons with disabilities, especially persons with developmental disabilities, and pursue funding sources designated for persons with special needs and disabilities. Program HE-6.1.3, carried over from the prior Housing Element (identified as Program HE.2.1.6 in the previous housing element) is intended to specifically address the needs of persons with a developmental disability. To remove regulatory barriers to the development of group homes, Program HE-6.1.4 157
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-25 January 31, 2023
commits the City to removing the distinction between small and large groups homes in the Medium Density Residential (R-2), High Density Residential (R-3), Commercial Downtown (C-2), and Commercial Highway (CH) zones and permit group care facilities as a by-right use in these zones.

3.3.5. FEMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS
Female-headed single-parent households experience numerous housing problems, including affordability (the individuals are often on public assistance), overcrowding (the individuals often cannot afford units large enough to accommodate their families), insufficient housing choices, and discrimination. The City of Yreka recognizes these problems and has included policies and programs in this document to address affordability, overcrowding, and discrimination for all segments of the population.

Table A-22 illustrates the number of family households that are headed by a female with no spouse present.

Female-headed households with no spouse present account for 10 percent of all households in the city. Of these households, the majority are renter-occupied. Table A-23 reports the presence of children in female-headed households, as well as poverty indicators for female-headed households. Female-headed households with their own children make up approximately 15 percent of all households in the city and approximately 74 percent of all female-headed households. Female-headed households under the poverty level make up 36 percent of all female-headed households and 7 percent of total city households.

Table A-22
Female Headed Family Household, 2019
Number Percentage of
Total Households
Owner-Occupied (Female Householder) 162 5%
Renter-Occupied (Female Householder) 175 5%
Total (Female Householder) 337 10%
Total City Households 3,402 100%
Source: 2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates
Table A-23
Female Householders by Children Present and Poverty, 2019 Householder Type Number % of
Total Households
Female-Headed Family Households 337 20
Female Heads with Own Children 248 15
Female Heads without Own Children 89 5
Total Householders 1,684 100
Female-Headed Householders Under the Poverty Level 123 7 Total families Under the Poverty Level 413 25
Source: 2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates

3.3.6. LARGE FAMILIES
A large family is one with five or more family members. Large families are considered a special needs group because they require larger homes, but don’t necessarily make enough money to afford many of the larger homes available. Those homes may be luxury or newer homes out of the range of affordability for lower-income 158
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-26 January 31, 2023
families. Thus, a large family may struggle to find suitable affordable housing. The number of large families in the city is shown in Table A-24. The proportion of renter households as a percentage of all large households decreased and now makes up the minority of all large family households. Owner-occupied large households now make up approximately 54 percent of all large households.

Table A-24
Large Families (5+ Family Members) by Tenure, 2000–2019 2000 2010 2019
Households
% of
Total
Households
Households
% of
Total
Households
Households
% of
Total
Households
Owner-Occupied
Large
Households
141 5% 132 4% 139 4.1%
Renter-Occupied
Large
Households
109 4% 214 6% 115 3.4%
Total Large
Households 250 8% 346 10% 254 7.5%
Total
Households 3,103 100% 3,394 100% 3402 100.0%
Source: 2000 US Census, 2010 US Census, 2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates

3.3.7. INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS Individuals and families may find themselves homeless for a variety of economic, social and/or personal reasons.

Their homelessness can be a temporary or semi-permanent living situation. Each situation in which people become homeless is different, requiring different housing needs. Regardless of the cause, the most immediate housing needs can be satisfied with three basic shelter types: emergency, transitional and temporary. Since the last Housing Element, the number of residents experiencing homelessness in the City has visibly increased.

According to the 2022 Community Health Needs Assessment for Siskiyou county the rate of homelessness, i.e., the number of homeless individuals per 100,000 population, of Siskiyou county is greater than California: 490.7 individuals for Siskiyou county to California’s 411.2 individuals (prepared by Dignity Health Mercy Medical Center Mt. Shasta, Fairchild medical Center, and Siskiyou County Public Health Department, pg. 45) is prepared The NorCal Continuum of Care (CoC) is a seven-county homeless consortium and is charged by the US Department of Housing and UrbanDevelopment (HUD) to conduct a Point In Time (PIT) Count annually. The PIT Count results in data that helps communities to prioritize those most vulnerable and chronically homeless for different types of shelter and housing. Point In Time Counts are reported at the county level. A PIT Count counts both sheltered and unsheltered individuals. The 2020 PIT County for Siskiyou county found there were 274 unsheltered individuals and 37 shelter individuals.

In 2021 HUD provided the CoC a waiver from conducting the unsheltered count due to COVID-19. The CoC’s 2021 PIT count found there were 214 sheltered residents in Siskiyou County. This is an increase of 177 individuals experiencing homelessness over 2020. Because the CoC counted only persons/households residing in a privately or publicly operated shelter in 2021 it is anticipated the 2021 PIT Count undercounts the number of persons experiencing homelessness in Siskiyou county. Table A-24 below provides the available racial and ethnic composition data from the 2020 and 2021 PIT counts.
159
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-27 January 31, 2023
Table A-25
Racial and Ethnic Information, 2020 and 2021 PIT Counts, Service Area of Norcal Continuum of Care 2020 2021
% of Unsheltered Total Persons % of Unsheltered Total Persons White 71.70% 733 79% 624
Black or African American 3.10% 32 4% 29
American Indian/Alaskan Native 10.80% 110 17% 133
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific
Islander 1.40% 14 1.5% 11
Asian 1.00% 10 1% 7
Multiple Races 7.30% 75 n/a
Did Not Respond 4.80% 49 38% 75
Refused n/a 1.5% 13
Hispanic/Latino 9.70% 99 13% 103
Non-Hispanic/Latino 84.80% 867 82% 652
Did Not Respond 5.60% 57 2% 15
Don't Know n/a 1% 7
Table A-26
Gender Information, 2020 and 2021 PIT Counts for Siskiyou County 2020 Total Persons 2021 Total Persons
Male 208 100
Female 95 112
Gender Non-Conforming 4 0
Trans 2 0
Did Not Respond 2 2
Refused n/a 0
Total 311 214
Sheltered 37 214
Unsheltered 274 n/a
With respect to age, 32 children under the age of 18 were a counted, and in 2021, 148 children were counted, a nearly five-fold increase in children experiencing homelessness. Additional demographic data is presented in Table A-26
160
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-28 January 31, 2023
Table A-27
Additional Demographics, 2020 and 2021 PIT Counts for Siskiyou County Additional Demographics 2020 Total Persons 2021 Total Persons Chronically Homeless 92 18
Families 24 22
Mental Disability not reported 46
Physical Disability not reported 27
Developmental Disability not reported 4
Altogether the data indicate both men and women are experiencing homelessness. While the number of families counted remained similar from 2020 to 2021, 24 and 22, respectively, the number of homeless children increased significantly. Whites alone are experiencing the highest rates of homelessness as a racial and ethnic group.

Several stakeholders remarked some individuals and households are experiencing homelessness because they have been displaced from their homes by the recent state wildfires in Siskiyou county and the larger region, and the slow and costly rebuilding process.

Although an official Yreka-specific count does not exist, the City notes there has been an observable increase in the number of residents experiencing homelessness. There is unsanctioned camp located in the vicinity of the College of the Siskiyous and Siskiyou County behavior health services, all of which are within city limits. A May 2022, tent survey conducted by members of the CoC indicates there are approximately 22 camps at this location.

The compiled information indicates there are approximately 25 residents in this camp. Camp residents were interviewed, on a voluntary basis, and the following most needed and requested items identified were:
• Water for drinking/cooking, personal sanitation, flush toilets, and fire safety • Trash pickup: more bags, a dumpster placed nearby, and more community help for cleaning up abandoned camp sites.
• Safe fire area for community cooking and hot water
• Police protection: tents cannot be left because outsiders invade the community. • Mail access: a nearby place the community can receive and send mai.l • ID help need for jobs, medical and social services.
• Small house: similar to Medford’s mini-homes to move into in the future.

Services for individuals and families experiencing homelessness are available in the city and elsewhere in the county. Yreka delegated the entirety of their 5-year allocation of Permanent Local Housing Allocation to the County. The County is allocating a portion of the PLHA formula funding to convert an existing structure to a low barrier shelter that is anticipated to open fall or winter 2023. PLHA funding is also providing financial support for a project sponsored by a local youth homeless program for the conversion of office space to a three room family shelter. Table A-24 below outlines the programs in the City and surrounding area that offer assistance.

Clearly there is a need for housing that is available and affordable to persons and families who experiencing homelessness. While emergency shelters provide temporary shelter and safe place to be, they do not provide a long term solution. Overall addressing the housing needs of this special population requires a variety of housing types that is assured to be affordable, mostly by way of government subsidies, such as housing choice vouchers.

There are examples of sanctioned communities that employ more affordable housing forms, such as tiny houses, to meet the housing needs of those experiencing homelessness. Permanent supportive housing is needed to 161
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-29 January 31, 2023
meet the needs of those experiencing chronic homelessness and disabilities. Another housing need is accessibility: according to the 2021 PIT, of those experiencing homeless, approximately 36 percent had one or more disability which speaks to a need for PSH and group homes. Given number of families and young children experiencing homelessness, housing is affordable for this target population, is configured for families, and is located in close to schools is critical. Universally, housing for this target population needs to be located close, e.g., no more than a quarter of a mile, from a transit stop, essential services such as a full grocery store, pharmacy, etc.

Table A-28
Homelessness Services
AgencyName Address City Services
Siskiyou CountyDomestic Violence & Crisis
Center 118 Ranch Lane Yreka 1, 4, 6, 7, 9
Lane Street Effort 417 Lane Street Yreka 6, 7, 8
Barker’s Board and Care 200 S. 4th Street Montague 8
Northern Valley Catholic Social Services 1515 S. Oregon Street Yreka 1, 3, 10 Siskiyou County BehavioralHealthDepartment 2060 CampusDrive Yreka 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17
CaliforniaDepartment of Rehabilitation 1288 S. Main Street Yreka 11 WorkforceConnection 310 Boles Street Weed 11
Siskiyou Training and Employment Program 310 Boles Street Weed 11 Yreka Family Resource Center 201 S. Broadway Yreka 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 10,18 WIC 1217 S. Main Street Yreka 10
SalvationArmy 501 N. Main Street Yreka 9, 10
Veteran’sAdministration 311 Lane Street Yreka 8, 13
GreenhornGrange 300 Ranch Lane Yreka 10
St.Joseph’s Catholic Church Hall 314 Fourth Street Yreka 10 YrekaDream Center Food Closet 900 North Street Yreka 10 Great Northern Services 310 Boles Street Weed 10
Siskiyou County Women, Infant, & Children 700 S Main Street Yreka 10, 18 Siskiyou Food Assistance 776 S Davis Avenue Weed 10, 15 Klamath Falls Gospel Mission 1931 Mission Avenue Klamath Falls, OR
5, 7, 8, 10
Klamath Lake County Food Bank 3231 Maywood Drive Klamath Falls, OR
10 Tulelake-Newell Family Center 810 Main Street Tulelake 18 Klamath & Lake Community Action Services 2316 S Sixth Street Suite C
Klamath
Falls, OR
14, 15, 17, 18
Klamath Advocacy Center 142 Riverside Drive Klamath
Falls, OR
3, 6
Disabled American Veterans 2809 Avalon Street Klamath
Falls, OR
13, 18
Exodus House 303 Washington
Street
Klamath
Falls, OR
3, 7, 14
162
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-30 January 31, 2023
Table 28 (cont’d)
Service Codes

1. AdultCounseling

2. Anger Management Classes

3. Counseling, Education, & Prevention

4. Crisis Intervention

5. Drug & Alcohol Treatment

6. Emergency Assistance For BatteredWomen

7. EmergencyHousing for Women & Children

8. EmergencyHousing For Men

9. Emergency, Transportation (e.g., bus ticket)

10. Food or Clothing Referral

11. Job Training

12. Treatment & Housing of Mentally Ill

13. VeteransAssistance

14. Independent Living Skills Training

15. Food Stamps, CalWorks, General Relief

16. Day Treatment

17. Workshops

18. Family Services
Source: City of Yreka

3.3.8. FARMWORKERS
Yreka is a low density rural community. There are no farmed areas within the City nor are there agricultural areas adjacent to the City. According to California Farm Bureau (https://www.cfbf.com/about-the-farmbureau/counties/, accessed January 3, 2023), the top crops in Siskiyou county are cattle, vegetables, strawberries, timber, and alfalfa hay. Closer to Yreka, the agricultural uses are primarily ranching with little need for seasonal farmworkers. According to representatives of the Modoc-Siskiyou Community Action Agency, silvicultural workers are mostly found in those Siskiyou County communities that are closer to planting sites.

The nearest community employing seasonal farmworkers is Macdoel, which is approximately 50 miles east of Yreka. This is the closest area where intensive farming of strawberry and potato crops occurs. Intensive farming of this nature does not occur within Yreka’s city limits. Soils in the Yreka area are considered to be too heavy for regular tillage, so they are used almost entirely for hay and pasture. Permanent farmworkers are paid wages similar to other skilled and semi-skilled workers in the region and need not be considered separately.

Farmworkers are defined as those households whose wage-earners make their living through permanent or seasonal agricultural work. Farmworker households may move with the seasons to different farming communities, or those who find tree planting jobs and who also move throughout the forested regions on a seasonal basis. Farmworker households may permanently reside in a community. According to the 2017 U.S.

Department of Agriculture Census, it is estimated there were nearly 4,000 farmworkers in Siskiyou county. Of those, approximately 34 percent worked 150 days or more at the same farm, whereas 66 percent worked less than 150 days on the same farm. This data suggests a majority of farmworkers are seasonal and are working on larger farms. The 2000 US Census (the most recent reliable source for this data), reported only 14 farmworkers living in the city at the time. Because Yreka is the seat of Siskiyou County government and many essential services and public amenities are located in Yreka, it is anticipated the number of farmworker households are reside in Yreka has increased since 2000.
163
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-31 January 31, 2023
Table A-29
Hired Farm Labor – State of California and Siskiyou County Farms Hired Workers $1,000 payroll
California 30,421 377,593 6,978,923
Siskiyou County 217 3,949 45,640
Source: USDA Census of Farmworkers 2017
Table A-30
Farmworkers by Days Worked—State of California and Siskiyou County California Siskiyou Co.
150 Days or More Farms [All] 18,439 124
Workers [All] 187,875 1,009
Farms with 10 or More Workers
Farms 3,481 15
Workers 146,791 714
Fewer than 150 Days Farms [All] 20,505 142
Workers [All] 189,718 2,940
Farms with 10 or More Workers
Farms 3,298 13
Workers 146,715 2,664
Source: USDA Census of Farmworkers 2017
164
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-32 January 31, 2023
The City was unable to locate Yreka-specific demographic data of farmworkers. Figure 3.A provides a demographic summary of key characteristics of California Farmworkers based on 2009-2011 American Community Survey data. Farmworkers in California:
• Are more likely to be men
• Between the ages of 25 and 44
• Over 80 percent are Hispanic/Latino
• Are not a citizen
• Have less than a high school education
• Live below the poverty line, with a majority living 200 percent below the poverty line
• Do not have health insurance
The 2019-2020 Findings from the National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) provides some demographic insights that point to farmworker housing needs (https://www.dol.gov/sites/ dol gov/files/ETA/naws/pdfs/NAWS%20Research%20Report%
2016.pdf, accessed January 3, 2023). The NAWS was prepared for the U.S Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. The preparers conducted field interviews of 2,172 U.S. farmworkers.
• Seventy-eight percent of all farmworkers were
Hispanic. Among U.S.-born workers, 32% were
Hispanic.
• Thirty-three percent of farmworkers self-identified as White, fewer than 1% as Black or African American, and
66% of respondents did not select a category; instead,
they described race with an open-ended “other” response. • Ten percent of farmworkers were identified as indigenous. • Most farmworkers were settled workers (85%). 15 percent were migrants. • Sixty-six percent of interviewed farmworkers were men. • Farmworkers’ average age was 41, and median age was 39. • 57 percent of all farmworkers were married.
• 50 percent of all farmworkers had children.
• Thirty-eight percent of farmworkers were living apart from all nuclear family members at the time of their interview. 66% of unaccompanied farmworkers were single workers without children, 14% were parents, and 10% had a spouse but no children.
• Approximately 62% of surveyed farmworkers reported that Spanish is their primary language. • Thirty-two percent of workers reported that they could speak English “well,” and 29% said, “not at all.” 31% reported that they could read English “well”; 40% said, “not at all.” • The average level of formal education completed by farmworkers was ninth grade. • Average hourly wage for all farmworkers: $13.59.

Altogether these data indicate farmworker housing needs to be affordable to extremely low and very low income households. Housing configurations for families and group living situations are needed. Farmworker housing needs to be located near schools and employment opportunities for spouses. Also, the data indicates a Figure 3.A
Source: Farmworkers in California: A Brief
Introduction, Latino Caucus, October 2013.
165
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-33 January 31, 2023
need for the dissemination of fair housing materials with being made available in Spanish, and proactive outreach to the farmworker community. There are two general categories of farmworker housing:
• If the housing is provided by the Employer: Living quarters in urban or rural areas provided by an employer in connection with any work (including agricultural work), whether or not rent is involved. HSC 17008(a) applies.
• If the housing in not provided by the Employer: Living quarters that house agricultural workers employed by an agricultural employer(s), and meet some other requirements. HSC 17008(b) applies.

This second type of employee housing is outside the scope of this document. See the state’s rules for additional licensing requirements.

The Yreka Municipal Code permits permanent employee housing, inclusive of farmworker housing, in all residential zones subject to the same standards.

The City Zoning Ordinance was updated in 2014 to comply with the state Employee Housing Act that ensures local zoning can accommodate employee housing for farmworkers and other employees. Program HE-3.1.1 commits the City to actions to affirmatively further fair housing. The actions, detailed in Table B-1 in Appendix B, include preparation of fair housing materials including preparing materials in Spanish language, and proactive outreach by City representatives attending of community events to answer questions and improve awareness.

Program HE-6.1.5 obligates the City to regularly monitor State law for changes in the legal requirements.

3.4. HOUSING COMPOSITION
The composition of housing units in Yreka
is mostly single-family. Table A-31 displays
the estimated number of each type of
housing unit for 2010, 2013, and 2021 as
reported by the DOF. There has been very
little change of housing unit types since
2010. Between 2010 and 2021, most of the
housing unit growth was the result of
increased single-family detached units.

The actual number of units issued building
permits for new construction between
2015 and 2021 was 11 single-family and no
multi-family.
166
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-34 January 31, 2023
Table A-31
Housing Unit Types, 2010–2021

2011 2013 2021
Units Percentage Units Percentage Units Percentage
Single-Family
Detached 2,239 61% 2,237 61% 2,266 61%
Attached 159 4% 159 4% 159 4%
Multi-Family
2-4 units 449 12% 449 12% 449 12%
5 or more 656 18% 656 18% 656 18%
Mobile Homes 172 5% 172 5% 176 5%
Total Units 3,675 100% 3,673 100% 3,706 100%
Source: Department of Finance Population and Housing Estimates 2011 - 2021 Table E-5

3.5. HOUSING CONDITIONS

3.5.1. AGE OF HOUSING STOCK
Housing element law requires an estimate of substandard housing in the community. Determining the percentage of units built prior to 1970 provides an estimate of major rehabilitation or replacement need. Table A-32 indicates that over 40 percent of the units in the city were constructed prior to 1970. Therefore, based on age alone, it would appear that approximately 40 percent of homes in the city may require rehabilitation or replacement, depending on the level of maintenance these units have received. However, at the time of the City’s 2013 Housing Condition Survey (detailed below), only 41 units, or just over 9 percent of surveyed units, were identified as needing more than minor repairs. It is important to note that the survey did not include mobile home parks and was performed as a “windshield survey.” Inclusion of the mobile home parks and a closer inspection could result in an increase in the number of units requiring rehabilitation or replacement.

Table A-32
Age of Housing Units
Year Built Housing
Units
Percentage of
Total
Built 1939 or earlier 435 11.9%
Built 1940 to 1949 184 5.0%
Built 1950 to 1959 544 14.9%
Built 1960 to 1969 354 9.7%
Built 1970 to 1979 784 21.4%
167
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-35 January 31, 2023
Year Built Housing
Units
Percentage of
Total
Built 1980 to 1989 609 16.6%
Built 1990 to 1999 339 9.3%
Built 2000 to 2009 256 7.0%
Built 2010 to 2013 148 4.0%
Built 2014 or later 8 0.2%
Total 3,661 100%
Source: 2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates

3.5.2. OCCUPANCY AND TENURE
Table A-33 and Table A-34 illustrate the tenure and occupancy of housing in Yreka. The most recent tenure information comes from the 2020 US Census ACS. According to this information, the majority of households are owner-occupied (more than 59 percent). The data also indicate the average household size is slightly larger for renter-occupied units. Table A-34 presents occupancy information from the Census Bureau for 2000, 2010, and 2019. The number of housing units increased by 358 between 2000 and 2019. The vacancy rate increased slightly during this period from approximately 6 to 7 percent.

Table A-33
Housing Units by Tenure, 2020
Tenure Units Percentage Average
Household Size
Owner-Occupied 2,026 59.5% 2.15
Renter-Occupied 1,381 40.5% 2.31
Total Occupied Housing Units 3,407 100%
Source: 2020 ACS Five-Year Estimates
Table A-34
Occupancy Status, 2000–2019
Occupancy
2000 2010 2019
Units Percentage Units Percentage Units Percentage
Total Occupied
Housing Units 3,114 94% 3,394 92% 3,402 92.9%
Total Vacant Housing
Units 189 6% 281 8% 259 7.1%
For Rent 85 3% 119 3% 55 1.5%
For Sale Only 33 1% 43 1% 0 0.0%
168
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-36 January 31, 2023
Occupancy
2000 2010 2019
Units Percentage Units Percentage Units Percentage
Rented or Sold,
Not Occupied 16 0% 20 1% 18 0.5%
For Seasonal,
Recreational, or
Occasional Use
21 1% 30 1% 69 1.9%
All Other Vacant 34 1% 69 2% 117 3.2%
Total Housing Units 3,303 100% 3,675 100% 3,661 100%
Source: 2000 US Census, Table H005; Siskiyou County 5th Cycle Housing Element Data Packet, 2013, ACS 2019

3.5.3. HOUSING CONDITIONS SURVEY
In June 2013, the City of Yreka conducted a windshield survey of housing conditions in the community. Of the 3,673 units in Yreka, 444, or 12 percent, were surveyed. The condition of housing was assessed by an exterior survey of the quality and condition of the building and what improvements (if any) were needed. Each structure was scored according to criteria established by HCD in five categories: foundation, roofing, siding, windows, and electrical. Based on scores assigned to the five categories, each structure was classified as being in sound or dilapidated condition, or in need of minor, moderate, or substantial repairs (as defined in Table A-35). The survey did not assess interior conditions.

Table A-35
Definition of Housing Conditions and 2013 Survey Results Condition Number of
Units Surveyed %
Sound Abuilding that appears new or well maintained and structurally intact. The foundation should appear
structurally undamaged and there should be straight
roof lines. Siding, windows, and doors should be in good repair with good exterior paint condition. Minor
problems such as small areas of peeling paint and/or
other maintenance items are allowable underthis
category.
309 70%
Minor Abuilding that shows signs of deferred maintenance or which only needs repair or replacement of one major
component, such as a roof.
94 21%
Moderate Abuilding in need of replacement of one or more major components and otherrepairs, such as roof
replacement, painting, and window repairs.
35 8%
Substantial Abuilding thatrequires replacement of several major systems and possibly otherrepairs, such as complete
foundation work,roof structure replacement and reroofing, painting, and window replacement. 2 <1%
169
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-37 January 31, 2023
Condition Number of
Units Surveyed %
Dilapidated Abuilding suffering from extensive neglect, which appears structurally unsound and maintenance is
nonexistent, is not fit for human habitation in its current condition, may be considered for demolition, or major
rehabilitation will be required at a minimum.
4 <1%
Of the units surveyed, 70 percent (309 units) were in sound condition, with the remaining 30 percent (135 units) requiring at least some repairs. Of the surveyed units, 21 percent (94 units) needed only minor repairs, with 8 percent (35 units) requiring moderate repairs. Two units surveyed needed substantial repairs, and four were considered dilapidated. If the units surveyed are a representative sample of housing units in Yreka, it means that of the community’s 3,673 units, 2,556 (70 percent) are in sound condition, 778 (21 percent) need only minor repairs, 290 (8 percent) housing units require moderate repairs, 17 (less than 1 percent) are in need of substantial repairs, and 33 (less than 1 percent) are considered dilapidated.

The City is in the process of updating its 2013 housing conditions survey. The preliminary results indicate housing conditions are similar as previously reported, although in neighborhoods of lower economic resources staff is observing occurrences that conditions have further degraded due to more limited financial resources to repair housing coupled with recent material and labor cost increases for home repair and maintenance. Given nearly 60 percent of the City’s housing stock is owner-occupied, securing funding for an owner-occupied rehab program would be one approach to make low-cost funding available to lower income residents who may not be able to afford housing repairs to improve the condition of their home. The HOME program is one funding source that allows funds to be used for this type of activity. Program HE-4.3.1 commits the City pursuing funding during planning period for an owner-occupied rehabilitation program to develop a financial resource that enables qualified homeowners to improve the condition of theirresidence. One component of Program HE-4.3.1 includes identifying any concentrations of substandard housing. The results of the survey will be used to prioritize rehabilitation funding. The results of updated housing conditions survey and ongoing economic conditions also suggest the need to continue Program HE.3.1.3 from the previous housing element. Program HE.3.1.3 prioritizes code enforcement has been carried forward as part of this housing element and is identified as Program HE-4.3.2.

3.5.4. HOUSEHOLD SIZE
Household size by tenure for 2000, 2010 and 2019 is shown in Table A-36. In 2000 and 2010, the majority of owner-occupied households were inhabited by two residents, but more recently a higher proportion exists for single-occupancy households. Renter-occupied households were mostly inhabited by one resident since 2000.

Although the absolute number of households changed for each category between 2000 and 2019, the proportion of each category remained relatively static, with the largest changing category being single-person owneroccupied housing increasing from 16 to 22 percent between 2010 and 2019. 170
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-38 January 31, 2023
Table A-36
Household Size by Tenure, 2000–2019

2000 2010 2019
Households Percentage Households Percentage Households Percentage Owner-Occupied
1 person 523 17% 550 16% 759 22%
2 persons 728 23% 727 21% 704 21%
3 persons 227 7% 206 6% 237 7%
4 persons 188 6% 149 4% 159 5%
5 persons 110 4% 72 2% 94 3%
6 persons 25 1% 26 1% 45 1%
7 or more
persons
6 0% 21 1% 0 0%
Renter-Occupied
1 person 521 17% 652 19% 657 19%
2 persons 312 10% 387 11% 301 9%
3 persons 221 7% 269 8% 178 5%
4 persons 133 4% 179 5% 153 4%
5 persons 49 2% 93 3% 70 2%
6 persons 13 <1% 44 1% 42 1%
7 or more
persons 47 2% 19 1% 3 0%
Total 3,103 100% 3,394 100% 3,402 100%
Source: 2000 US Census, 2010 US Census, 2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates

3.5.5. OVERCROWDED HOUSING
The US Census Bureau defines overcrowding as more than 1.01 persons per room. Severe overcrowding occurs when there are more than 1.5 persons per room. Table A-37 and Table A-38 illustrate the number and percentage of units in the city according to occupants per room. Less than 1 percent of owner-occupied housing units and less than 2 percent of renter-occupied units were either overcrowded or severely overcrowded in 2019. Although there are some households experiencing overcrowding, these numbers show that both overcrowding and severe overcrowding does not appear to be an issue in the city.

Table A-37
Overcrowded Housing, 2000 and 2019

2000 2019
Households Percentage Households Percentage
Owner-Occupied Total 1,817 58.4% 1,998 58.7%

0.50 or less occupants per room 1,420 45.6% 1,367 40.2%

0.51 to 1.00 occupants per room 371 11.9% 607 17.8%

1.01 to 1.50 occupants per room 26 0.8% 11 0.3%
171
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-39 January 31, 2023

2000 2019
Households Percentage Households Percentage

1.51 to 2.00 occupants per room 0 0% 0 0.0%

2.01 or more occupants per room 0 0% 13 0.4%
Renter-Occupied Total 1,296 41.6% 1,404 41.3%

0.50 or less occupants per room 757 24.3% 784 23.0%

0.51 to 1.00 occupants per room 442 14.2% 569 16.7%

1.01 to 1.50 occupants per room 69 2.2% 41 1.2%

1.51 to 2.00 occupants per room 8 0.3% 10 0.3%

2.01 or more occupants per room 20 0.6% 0 0.0%
Source: 2000 US Census, 2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates
Table A-38
Overcrowded Housing Summary, 2019
Overcrowded Type Households
Total Overcrowded (1.01 or more) 75
Owner-Occupied 24
Renter-Occupied 51
Total Severely Overcrowded (1.5 or more) 23
Owner-Occupied 13
Renter-Occupied 10
Source: 2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates

3.6. HOUSING COSTS

3.6.1. OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING
Table A-39 presents the housing value for owner-occupied homes in the city. Despite the high cost of housing, the majority of homes (54 percent) were valued below $150,000 in 2019.

Table A-39
Owner-Occupied Housing Unit Value, 2019
Value Number of
Homes
Percentage of
Homes
$0 to $49,999 229 14%
$50,000 to $99,999 183 11%
$100,000 to $149,999 492 29%
$150,000 to $199,999 580 34%
$200,000 to $249,999 151 9%
172
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-40 January 31, 2023
Value Number of
Homes
Percentage of
Homes
$250,000 to $299,999 147 9%
$300,000 to $499,999 178 11%
$500,000 and up 38 2%
Total 1,998 100%
Source: 2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates
Housing cost information is supplemented by Table A-40, which notes that the median home sales price in October 2020 was approximately $286,000 and in October 2021 was approximately $330,000. There was a substantial home value increase between 2020 and 2021 of almost $44,000, which mirrors state trends.

According to California Association of Realtors prices rose by almost $15,000 in one month from September to October, 2021.

A household can typically qualify to purchase a home that is two and one-half to three times its annual income, depending on the down payment, the level of other long-term obligations (such as a car and/or student loan), and interest rates. In practice, the interaction of these factors allows some households to qualify for homes priced at more than three times their annual income, while other households may be limited to purchasing homes no more than two times their annual income. With prices this high, the median home price in Yreka is not affordable to any group less than above moderate income (>$42,483).

Table A-40
Median Home Sales Price, 2000 and 2021
Oct-201 Sep-211 Oct-211 Income to Afford 2021
Median Home Price1
Siskiyou
County $286,000 $315,000 $329,500 $72,406
1 Source: California Association of Realtors 2021, October Home Sales and Price Report, https://www.car.org/aboutus/mediacenter/newsreleases/2021releases/oct2021sales The City used the California Association of Realtors traditional method to estimate the minimum income needed to afford a median priced home (as of 2021) presented in Table A-40. The $72,406 minimum needed income is based on the following assumptions for a traditional mortgage:
• a 20 percent down payment ($65,900.00),
• an interest rate of 5.1 percent (as per https://www.mortgagecalculator.org on September 8, 2022), • property taxes are 1 percent of median price ($3,295), • homeowner's insurance is 0.38 percent ($1,252) of median price, • loan applicants have excellent credit scores.
• monthly PITI cannot exceed 30 percent of the household’s gross income.

The qualifying income for the average sales price of a home would require an approximate income of $72,406, which based on the 2022 HCD income limits, is affordable to a Yreka household of four earning the median of $80,300. However, it would be outreach financially for smaller households and householders that earn less than the Siskiyou county median income.
173
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-41 January 31, 2023

3.6.2. RENTAL HOUSING
Table A-37 shows the available apartments and houses for rent in Yreka during a point-in-time survey taken in January 2022. There were no four-bedroom apartment or house rentals advertised inside the city. According to HUD data, as of April 2021, there are 97 Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV), which represent 5.90 (average) of renter occupied housing units in Yreka and the immediate adjacent unincorporated area. HCV are a federal program that assists very low-income families, the elderly, and the disabled in obtaining decent, safe, and sanitary housing in the private market. Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) receive federal funds from HUD to administer the voucher program, and housing subsidies are paid to the landlord directly by the PHA on behalf of the participating family. The voucher recipient remains responsible for paying any difference that exists between the actual rent charged by the landlord and the amount subsidized by the program. HCV are being used across almost the entire City. The 2021 data indicates that HCV are not being used in the neighborhoods at the western edge of the city, and the neighborhood south Greenhorn Road and south of the convergence of State Highway 3 and Interstate 5.

Table A-41
Apartment and House Rentals, January 2022
Bedroom Type Number of Units
Surveyed Rent Range
Studio 1 $925
One Bedroom 5 $600-$800
Two Bedroom 3 $756-$1,500
Three Bedroom 3 $862-$1,250
Sources: Apartmentsguide.com, Craigslist, Rent.com January 2022.

3.6.3. MOBILE HOUSING
The Department of Finance’s 2021 Estimate of Population and Housing shows a total of 176 mobile homes in Yreka, which represents 5 percent of the total housing stock. A June 2022 search on mobile home sale and rental pricing yielded $1,175 per month for a long term rental at Yreka RV Park. According to a Realtor.com search, on June 29, 2022, there are two manufactured homes for sale in Yreka. Both homes are located in an existing park at 400 Hiram Page Road:
• $20,000: 1,440 sq. ft. 2 bedroom, two bath home
• $34,900: 800 sq. ft. 2 bedroom, one bath home

3.6.4. OVERPAYMENT
Definitions of housing affordability can vary, but in general a household should pay no more than 30 percent of its monthly income on housing costs. Households that pay more than this are considered “cost-burdened” and households that pay more than 50 percent are considered “severely cost- burdened.” Measuring the number of households paying more than these percentages helps define an area’s affordability problem. Overpayment data for all Yreka households by tenure is reported by the 2015–2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates. Table A-42 provides this information for each income category as well as for all households with lower incomes (extremely low, very low and low-income households). Approximately 83 percent of households earning 30 percent or less of the area mean income (AMI) spent more than 30 percent of their income on housing costs; approximately 72 percent of households earning between 30 and 50 percent AMI were also burdened by the cost of housing.

Renter households experienced a much higher rate of overpayment than owner households at lower incomes. 174
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-42 January 31, 2023
Table A-42
Cost Burdens for All Households, 2019
Household
Extremely
Low (30 %
or less of
AMI)
Very Low
(> 30% to
50% AMI)
Low
(> 50% to
80% AMI)
Moderate
(> 80% to
120% AMI)
Above
Moderate
(> 120%
AMI)
Total
Households
Lower
Income
Households
(80% or less
of AMI)
Tl. Ownership
Households
195 190 435 135 930 1,885 820
Overpaying
Owner
Households
155 110 145 35 25 470 410
% of
Overpaying
Owners

79.5% 57.9% 33.3% 25.9% 2.7% 24.9% 50%
Tl. Renter
Households
390 365 380 120 260 1,515 1,135
Overpaying
Renter
Households
330 290 215 10 15 860 835
% of
Overpaying
Renters

84.6% 79.5% 56.6% 8.3% 5.8% 56.8% 74%
Total
Households
585 555 815 255 1190 3,400 1,955
Total
Overpaying
Households
485 400 360 45 40 1,330 1,245
% of Total
Overpaying
Households

82.9% 72.1% 44.2% 17.6% 3.4% 39.1% 64%
Source: 2019 ACS Five-Year Estimates
The US Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategies (CHAS) database reports on households with housing problems including the lack of a kitchen, the lack of complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, and severe cost burden. As noted in Table A-43, renters experience housing problems at a much higher rate than owners, particularly renters that make less than 50 percent of area median income.
175
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-43 January 31, 2023
Table A-43
Number of Households with Any Housing Problem*
Total
Renters Total Owners Total Households
Household Income ≤30% AMI with
Any Housing Problems 255 140 395
Household Income >30% to ≤50% AMI
with Any Housing Problems 335 60 395
Household Income >50% to ≤80% AMI
with Any Housing Problems 165 180 345
Source: CHAS 2018
*CHAS defines “any housing problem” as one or more of the following: lacks kitchen, lacks complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, and severe cost burden.

4. HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
Various interrelated factors may constrain the ability of the private and public sectors to provide adequate housing that meets the needs of all economic segments of the community. These constraints can be divided into two categories: governmental and non-governmental. Governmental constraints consist of land use controls, development standards, processing fees, development impact fees, code enforcement, development permit and approval processing, and provision for a variety of housing. Non-governmental constraints include land availability, land cost, site improvement costs, construction costs, and availability of financing.

4.1. GOVERNMENTAL

4.1.1. LAND USE CONTROLS
The City of Yreka’s General Plan establishes policies that guide all new development, including residential land uses. These policies, along with zoning regulations, control the amount and distribution of land allocated for different land uses in the city. Table A-44 shows the residential land use designations established by the General Plan.
176
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-44 January 31, 2023
Table A-44
Residential Land Use Designations
Designation Maximum
Density Notes
Residential Agriculture (RA) 2 units/acre
Large-lot single-family residential, either by design or by incorporation of previously developed county areas. Limited agricultural use due to higher residential density than conventional agriculture.

Low Density Residential
(LDR) 6 units/acre
Single-family development, found throughout much of the city. This designation could also allow single-family
attached, townhouses, etc., with special zoning and design considerations.

Medium Density Residential
(MDR) 10 units/acre
Usually used for duplexes, triplex and fourplex development, as well as smaller apartment buildings. This designation could also support garden apartments and townhouses.

HighDensity Residential
(HDR) 15 units/acre
Conventional apartment or condominium development for
larger numbers of units within a single project.

HistoricDistrict (HD) 13 units/acre1
A combination of commercial and residential uses located within the historic core of the city. These uses have a set of development criteria designed to help encourage the
preservation and enhancement of the historic structures and uses. More pedestrian than vehicle oriented,
development in this area of the city is often on smaller lots.

Source: City of Yreka General Plan
1 No maximum density listed in the Land Use Element. Reported maximum density based on Table 1-4 (General Plan Designation & Zone Consistency) of the Land Use Element of the General Plan, which identifies R-1 and R-2 as possible residential zoning districts in the HD.

4.1.2. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Zoning regulations are designed to protect and promote the health, safety, and general welfare of residents as well as to implement the policies of the General Plan. The Zoning Code also serves to preserve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods. Table A-45 shows the zoning districts that permit residential development by-right, and the respective allowable densities and respective development standards. The lot and development standards of the by-right residential zones are objective. Table A-47 presents the same data categories for zones that conditionally permit residential development and applicants must apply for and secure a use permit before a building permit can be approved.

Table A-45
Zoning District Development Standards for Residential Uses Residential
Agricultural (R-A)
Low Density
Residential (R-1)
Medium
Density
Residential (R-2)
High Density
Residential
(R-3-12 & R-3-16)
Residential
Professional
Office (RPO)
Density: Units
Per Acre 1 1–6 1-13 1–12, 1–16 1–131
177
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-45 January 31, 2023
Residential
Agricultural (R-A)
Low Density
Residential (R-1)
Medium
Density
Residential (R-2)
High Density
Residential
(R-3-12 & R-3-16)
Residential
Professional
Office (RPO)
Minimum Lot
Size 43,560 sq. ft. 7,000 sq. ft. 8,000 sq. ft. 14,000 sq. ft. 7,000 sq. ft.

Minimum Lot
Width 150’ 70’ 70’ 70’ 70’
Front Yard
Setback 20’ 20’ 20’ 20’ 20’
Side Yard
Setback 10’ 10’ on one side
5’ on the other
10’ on one side
5’ on the other 10’ 10’ on one side5’ on the other
Rear Yard
Setback 20’ 20’ 20’ 20’ 20’1
Max.Building
Height 25’ 25’ 35’ 35’ 35’
Max. Lot
Coverage 20%2 40% 50% 75% 75%
Min. Parking
Spaces Per
Unit
2 2 2 1½ 2
1 Parking
Improvement
Both spaces in
garage or carport
Both spaces in
garage or carport
1 space covered
and 1 improved
parking space
1 space covered
per family unit
1 space covered
and 1 improved
parking space
Source: City of Yreka Zoning Ordinance, 2013 1
Defaults to R-2 standards. 2
20% is for residential uses, maximum lot coverage for nonresidential uses is 60%.

A. The By-Right Residential Zones
The Residential Agricultural (R-A) zone is a suburban residential zone that allows low density single family development and limited agricultural uses. Vacant parcels zoned R-A are found at the southern end of Yreka and in the section that is northeast of the intersection of Interstate 5 and Highway 3.

The Low Density Residential (R-1) zone allows conventional single family development. Two clusters of vacant R-1 parcels flank the City’s historic downtown and core to the north and southwest. Southeast of the intersection of Interstate 5 and Highway 3 there is a sizeable cluster of vacant R-1 parcels. Then at the southern end there is another cluster of vacant R-1 parcels. Altogether there is 177 vacant R-1 parcels with a combined acreage of 1,177 acres.

Medium Density Residential (R-2) is a transition zone between the R-1 and High Density Residential (R-3) zones having attributes of both. As shown in Table A-45, the lot and development standards are akin to those of the R1 zone, while the permitted residential density and types of residential uses of the R-2 zone are more similar to R-3. There are six vacant R-2 parcels that total 138 acres.

The High Density Residential (R-3) zone is intended to provide areas for higher density residential development including condominium development. As discussed further below, the R-3 zone’s default density is 16 dwelling 178
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-46 January 31, 2023
units per acre. Currently there are seventeen vacant R-3 parcels in the City. Of those 17 parcels, the R-3 density of 13 parcels been modified and reduced to 12 dwelling units per acre, and are identified by their “R-3-12” zoning.

Aside from the change in allowable density, the R-3 zone’s lot and development standards remain the same.

Combined the R-3-12 parcels total almost 75 acres. The four R-3 parcels with the unmodified density of 16 dwelling units per acre are identified as R-3-16, and total 7.3 acres.

The Residential Professional Office (RPO) zone is a mixed use zone allowing both residential and professional office uses. RPO is intended for areas which are typically transitional between commercial and residential uses, and does not prioritize commercial uses over residential uses. The lot standards and development standards are similar to those of R-1 zone while allowing greater lot coverage and taller structures. There are 12 vacant RPO parcels scattered in the City west of Interstate 5.

Lot Size and Density
The minimum residential lot sizes for the by-right residential zones range from 7,000 square feet to 1 acre. The largest minimum lot size applies to the Residential Agricultural (R-A) zone, a suburban residential zone that also allows limited agricultural uses. Generally, the lot size minimums and density ranges of the by-right residential zones are reasonable and can accommodate a range of residential uses. During the previous housing element cycle, the City did not receive any requests to develop designated 5th cycle inventory sites below the density anticipated in the inventory; lower density requests did not hinder the City’s progress on the 5th cycle RHNA. For the duration of the 5th cycle, nearly all development requests have been for SFR development on SFR planned/zoned parcels. The assisted multifamily development of Siskiyou Crossroads is the sole exception.

Siskiyou Crossroads did not involve a lower density request.

Yreka’s two multifamily zones are the Medium Density Residential (R-2) and High Density Residential (R-3) zones. The zones are similar with respect to the type of housing units allowed, as shown in Table A-49 below, with the distinguishing attribute between the two zones being the maximum allowed density: the maximum allowable density in the R-2 zone is 13 dwelling units per acre, whereas the R-3 zone allows up to 16 dwelling units per acre, except where the zone is R-3-12, as discussed above.4 Because multifamily development (configured as duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes) are allowed by-right in the RPO zone and commercial uses are not prioritized over residential uses, the RPO zone also functions as a multifamily zone.

As an incorporated city in a non-metropolitan/rural county, the City of Yreka may elect to use the default density of 15 dwelling units per acre to satisfy the requirement of Government Code Section 65583.2(c). When a jurisdiction uses and conforms to the default density standard, by operation of law the jurisdiction’s zoning standard is appropriate to accommodate housing for lower income households. The R-3 zone’s density of 16 dwelling units per acre meets threshold requirements of Government Code Section 65583.2(c), and the City of Yreka designates the R-3-16 as the zone to meet its lower income regional housing needs allocation (RHNA).

Lot Coverage
The City’s maximum lot coverage standards for Residential Agricultural (R-A), Low Density Residential (R-1), High Density Residential (R-3-12 and R-3-16), and Residential Professional Office (RPO) are reasonable and do not present barriers for parcels to be developed with a variety of housing types.

The 50 percent lot coverage standard of the R-2 zone, however, may encourage properties in this zone to be developed at the lower end of the R-2 zone’s density range of 1-13 dwelling units per acre. For example, up to 4,200 square feet of a 7,000 square foot R-1 zone parcel (40 percent lot coverage on a parcel at the minimum parcel size) can be covered with structures. Whereas only 4,000 square feet of an 8,000 square foot R-2 zone parcel could be developed with structures (50 percent lot coverage on parcel at the minimum parcel size). In this example a developer would have increase building height to utilize the R-2 zone’s higher density of up to 13 179
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-47 January 31, 2023
dwelling unit pers per acre. Taller buildings are more costly to design and build. The R-2 zone’s maximum lot coverage of 50 percent may be the most significant barrier for these parcels being developed at the designated maximum density.

Building Height
The maximum height limit for residential units is 25 feet in the R-A and R-1 districts and 35 feet in the R-2, R-3, and RPO zones. In the past, the height limit has not inhibited multifamily development as demonstrated by the 61-unit Shasta Courtyards development that has four two-story buildings on 5.4 acres, the 81-unit Emerald Pointe Apartments that has five two-story buildings on 6.1 acres, and the 31-unit Sierra Vista Retirement Center that has a single three-story building on 2.5 acres.

Parking Standards
Parking Ratios: standards require a minimum of 2 parking spaces per unit in the R-A, R-1, R-2, and RPO zones and 1.5 spaces in the R-3 district. While historically the parking standards have been considered to be minimal and not a constraint to development, parking requirements add development cost from construction of the parking areas, ongoing maintenance, and the physical area they occupy. The initial cost to develop an uncovered parking stall is approximately $5000 per space and $2.42 per space per day in maintenance costs (Willson, 2013).5

Configuration of Multifamily Housing
The R-2 zone allows housing developments to be configured as single-family dwellings, ADUs and JADUs, duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes by-right. The R-2 zone does not allow housing developments to be configured as more than fourplexes, however. Housing developments in the R-2 zoning district are not subject to development requirements for minimum density, a maximum lot size standard to develop a single family dwelling, or demonstration that an R-2 parcel will have adequate area to support additional housing development including multifamily. The R-2 zone serves as a transition zone between R-1 and R-3, however. Like the R-2 zone, the RPO zone permits housing configured duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes by-right. Multifamily housing configured as more than a fourplex is prohibited. The combination of the RPO zones lot and development standards, namely the 75 percent lot coverage, the allowance for a maximum density of 13 dwelling units per acre, and that commercial uses are not prioritize over residential uses, parcels zoned RPO zone have potential for supporting an intense level of development.

The R-3 zone allows the identical range of by-right housing configurations as the R-2 zone: single-family dwellings, ADUs and JADUs, duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes. A developer must secure approval of a use permit to develop housing configured as more than fourplexes in the R-3 zone. The existing R-3 zone may impede multifamily development on two fronts:

1. By-right housing unit configurations are limited to fourplexes. Housing configurations beyond a fourplex require a conditional use permit, which increases the cost, time, and risk for a housing developer to develop R-3 sites with multifamily development. This standard also reduces the developer’s flexibility to develop a site to accommodate on-site or adjacent environmental constraints and protected resources.

At the same time the safety features of the building are dictated by building and fire codes which are not discretionary.

2. The allowance for by-right a single family dwelling without other development requirements for minimum density, a lot size maximum for a single family dwelling development, or demonstration that an R-3 parcel will have adequate area to support additional housing development including multifamily.

The by-right allowance for single family residential development creates the potential for the City’s lower income designated inventory sites to be underutilized with single family residential development. The 180
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-48 January 31, 2023
absence of other requirements for single family development in the R-3 zone does not uniformly prioritize R-3 sites for multifamily development.

A conditional use permit for a multifamily housing with units configured as more than fourplexes entails a public hearing before the Planning Commission and this process typically takes six months. Two months of the sixmonth period is the City working with a developer on application review and code compliance. As a discretionary project, these types of housing developments are subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Although the environmental review usually results in the preparation of a negative declaration (i.e., a finding that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment) for the project this process takes about four months. There are no design standards, architectural review, or other criteria applied except normal setbacks, building height, lot coverage, density, and parking requirements. The Planning Commission primarily considers potential environmental impacts, as well as public improvements (e.g., curb, gutter, sidewalk, and drainage improvements) that may be necessary to support the project. The entire process from submittal to public hearing and project approval is typically about six months. Should a project be appealed to the City Council, another three to four weeks could be added to the processing time, but this has not occurred on the few projects processed in recent years. While the conditional use permit process adds an application step, historically projects have not been denied nor have projects been altered in a manner which would affect project feasibility. Once the entitlement process is complete, the building permit process typically takes another three months for applicants to complete and another month for building review and approval. Overall, planning and building for a housing project with units configured as more than fourplexes would be 9 to 12 months. The City acknowledges the conditional use process adds approximately six months which represents a constraint. It is also recognized what has been the typical conditional use permit process is subject to change because of the discretionary nature of the process.

While the City’s 5th cycle housing element did not consider the conditional use requirement to be a significant constraint on the development of affordable housing, it can be a deterrent for both market rate and non-profit housing developers. The discretionary permit process inherently adds time, costs, and introduces risk because the outcome on the entitlement is uncertain. The developer is not only incurring cost associated with securing the entitlement, during the duration of the entitlement process developers incur carrying costs, e.g., property taxes, mortgage payments, insurance, maintenance, etc. The discretionary permit process by its nature also increases risk because approval of the entitlement is not assured. The discretionary permit process may result in conditions of approval and mitigation measures being attached to the entitlement, and these may increase development costs. As a result, market-rate housing developers and investors “often require higher returns depending on the perceived risk” (https://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/development-calculator-dashboard/#local governmentfactors, Terner Center for Housing Innovation, accessed May 28, 2022). Developers and investors expectation for higher returns are added to the project’s overall costs. Ultimately these costs are passed along to the consumer, whether the consumer is a renter or a home buyer. For affordable housing projects there are limited number of federal and state funding sources that can be used to subsidize pre-development cost, e.g., Community Development Block Grant (CDBG). But these funding sources are often oversubscribed and are highly competitive. Many funding sources require projects to be “shovel ready”, meaning any necessary entitlements are secured by the developer. Due to the increased time and cost described above, it may be necessary for the non-profit housing developer to secure additional funding, stacking multiple sources of funding to construct the project.

Occupancy Standards
While less common today, historically jurisdictions have used their zoning regulations to discriminate against group and congregate living situations by way adopting a narrow and traditional definition of family. The City does not regulate occupancy of residential units. While Section 16.12.480 of the Zoning Code seemingly provides 181
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-49 January 31, 2023
a broad definition of “family” that is inclusive of tradition and non-traditional living situations: “Family means a group of individuals with a common bond by means of blood, marriage, or conscientiously established relations living together as a housekeeping unit sharing a dwelling unit. Clients of a group home subject to California Community Care Facilities Act (Health and Safety Code 1500 et seq.) are not deemed a family for purposes of this title”, the definition’s inclusion of “…a common bond by means of blood, marriage, or conscientiously established relations…” language is a constraint. Program HE-6.1.6 commits the City to updating its definition of family to comply with State law.

Summary
Presently there are 258 vacant parcels that total 2,056 acres that allow by-right residential development, as summarized in Table A-46 below. Parcels zoned R-A and R-1 comprise nearly 89 percent, or greater than 1,825 acres, of this inventory. The most common size of R-A and R-1 parcel is 0.30 and 0.50 acres, or 13,068 and 21,780 square feet, respectively. As for parcels zoned R-2, R-3-12, and R-3-16, there are only 23 parcels that altogether comprise 220 acres, or almost 11 percent of the City inventory of land now zoned to allow by-right multifamily development.

Table A-46
Summary of Vacant By-Right Parcels
Parcel Count
by Zoning
Total Acreage
by Zone
Avg. Parcel
Size (acres)
% of Tl.

Acreage
Smallest
Parcel (acres)
Largest
Parcel (acres)
R-1 177 1,177.3 6.65 57.3% 0.01 141
R-2 6 138.4 23.07 6.7% 0.07 136.9
R-3-12 13 74.6 5.74 3.6% 0.04 44.8
R-3-16 4 7.3 1.82 0.35% 0.19 5.53
R-A 46 648.6 14.10 31.6% 0.02 140.4
RPO 12 9.6 0.80 0.47% 0.01 5.6
Total 258 2,055.9 7.97 100%
The current zoning creates a significant inventory of land affording opportunities to develop new single family dwellings, ADU and junior ADUs, and SB 9 housing developments. However, opportunities to develop multifamily and denser residential development are limited due to the small number of parcels that are zoned to allow by-right multifamily development. Finally, it is noted that the small size of some parcels (less than 500 square feet in size) may impede development. Property owners may find it necessary to consolidate these parcels with larger adjoining properties.

B. Zones Where Residential Uses Are Conditionally Permitted Table A-47 identifies the zones that conditionally permit residential uses. All of these zones specify a minimum lot size of 7,000 square feet and maximum allowable building height is 35 feet. Except for the CPO zone, the C2, CH, and CT zones do not specify a minimum or maximum residential density or the minimum number of parking spaces to be provided. As part of the conditional use permit process and on a project-by-project basis it is likely these variables would be determined. In the case of the parking standards, staff may consult the parking standards for similar uses to develop an estimate for the number of parking space. The absence of objective density and parking standards adds uncertainty for housing development proposals in these zones. This added uncertainty would accompany increases in time, cost, and risk described above. 182
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-50 January 31, 2023
Table A-47
Zoning District Development Standards for Residential Uses Commercial
Professional Office
(CPO)
Commercial
Neighborhood (C-2)
Commercial
Highway (CH)
Commercial
Tourist (CT)
Units Per Acre 1–131 – – –
Minimum Lot Size 7,000 sq. ft. 7,000 sq. ft. 7,000 sq. ft. 7,000 sq. ft.

Minimum Lot Width 70’ 50’ 70’ 70’
Front Yard Setback 20’ None 20’ 20’
Side Yard Setback 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’
Rear Yard Setback 20’1 None 10’ 10’
Max.Building Height 35’ 35’ 35’ 35’
MinimumParking
Spaces PerUnit 2
1 – – –
Max. Lot Coverage 60% 100% 100% 100%
Source: City of Yreka Zoning Ordinance, 2013 1 Defaults to R-2 standards.

Of the four zones identified in Table A-47 that allow conditionally allow residential uses, there are 61 vacant parcels that total 145.5 acres, except there are no vacant CPO parcels presently. Table A-48 summarizes vacant parcels presently zoned to allow residential development with a use permit. The data indicate at this time there are no parcels in the CPO zone that are vacant. There are 41 vacant parcels in the Commercial Highway (CH) zone that comprise 134 acres altogether. The availability of CH parcels dwarfs the 20 vacant C-2 and CT parcels that are 11 acres when combined.

Table A-48
Summary of Vacant Parcels Where Residential Uses Require a Use Permit Parcel Count
by Zoning
Total Acreage
by Zone
Avg. Parcel
Size (acres)
% of Tl.

Acreage
Smallest
Parcel (acres)
Largest Parcel
(acres)
C-2 9 1.2 0.1 0.8% 0.01 0.3
CH 41 134.2 3.3 92.2% 0.02 29.7
CT 11 10.0 0.9 6.9% 0.07 3.5
Total 61 145.5 2.4 100.0%

4.1.3. PROVISIONS FOR A VARIETY OF HOUSING
The Housing Element must identify adequate sites that are available for the development of housing types for all economic segments of the population. Part of this entails evaluating the City’s Zoning Code and its provision for a variety of housing types. The City’s Zoning Code provides for many types of housing as indicated in Table A-49. 183
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-51 January 31, 2023
While the Zoning Code provides for a diverse range of housing types, recent amendments to State law for navigation centers, supportive housing developments, etc. obligate the City to amendment its Zoning Code.

Accordingly, Chapter 2 Goals, Policies and Programs includes Program HE-7.1.1 committing the City to completing these Zoning Code amendments as part of its General Plan update. Assembly Bill 2634 (Lieber, 2006) requires the quantification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs of extremely low-income households. Elements must also identify ways to encourage and facilitate housing for extremely low-income households.
184
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-52 January 31, 2023
Table A-49
Housing Types Permitted by Zoning District
ResidentialUses R-A R-1 R-2 R-3 RPO CPO C-1 C-2 CH CT M-1 M-2 Single-FamilyDwelling P P P P P C E C C C E C**
ADU and JADU P P P P* P* P* E P* P* P* E E
SecondSingle-FamilyDwelling P P P P P C E C C C E E
Duplexes E P P P P C E C C C E E
Triplexes and Fourplexes E E P P P C E C C C E E
Five or More Units E E E C E E E C C C E E
Condominiums E E P C P C E C C C E E
MobileHomes on Individual Lots P P P P P C E C C C E E
Group CareHome - Small
(= six and fewer individuals) P P P P P C E C C C E E
Group CareHome - Large
(= greater than six individuals) E E C P P C E C C C E E MobileHome Park E E E C E E E C C C E E
Employee Housing - Small P P P P P C E C C C E E
Employee Housing - Large P E P P P C E C C C E E
Transitional and Supportive Housing P P P P P C E C C C E E Supportive Housing Developments† P P P† P† P† C† E C C C E E Emergency Shelters E E E E E E E E E E P E
Low Barrier Navigation Centers† E E P† P† P† P† E P C C E E Single-Room Occupancy Units E E E E E E E C C C E E
Source: City of Yreka ZoningOrdinance
P = Permitted C = Conditional Use Permit E = Excluded
* = Permitted with existing or proposed single- or multifamily dwelling with an approved use permit also in the M-1 zone † Title 16 of the Yreka Municipal code to be amended to add use ** = Caretaker Residence not to exceed 1,500 square feet. 185
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-53 January 31, 2023
A. Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory dwelling units (ADU) and Junior Accessory dwelling units (JADU) are types of housing that may be more affordable by design. An ADU is an accessory dwelling unit with complete independent living facilities for one or more persons, and may be configured as detached or attached from the primary unit, be converted from existing space or structure such as a garage or pool house. A JADU is a specific type of conversion of existing space that is contained entirely within an existing or new single-family residence, and cannot be more than 500 square feet. A JADU may share central systems, contain a basic kitchen utilizing small plug-in appliances, may share a bathroom with the primary dwelling, all to reduce development costs. An ADU may be rented for more than 30 days; JADUs may also be rented for more than 30 days but either the JADU or the primary unit must be occupied by the property owner.

The 2017 Legislative Housing Package brought sweeping amendments to State accessory dwelling law to remove regulatory barriers at both the state and local level. State law requires jurisdictions to permit ADUs and JADUs by-right in all areas that are zoned to allow single-family and multifamily residential uses. Jurisdictions must allow conversion of existing accessory structures to ADUs. State law limits development standards such as setbacks and lot coverage that a jurisdiction may impose, along with limiting local parking requirements and the imposition of impact fees. Development and design standards that may be adopted by local government must be objective. ADUs and JADUs that conform with State law shall not be considered to exceed the allowable density for a lot and are deemed a residential use that is consistent with the existing general plan and zoning designations for the lot. ADU/JADU ordinances adopted by jurisdictions are subject to HCD review for compliance with State law. Specific to Housing Element updates, a jurisdiction’s housing element must include a plan that incentivizes and promotes creation of ADUs that can offer affordable rents for very low, low- or moderate income households.

The City adopted Zoning Ordinance amendments to allow ADUs and JADUs consistent with State law first in 2018 then again in 2020. Table A-49 provides an overview of the zones permitting ADUs and JADUs. Consistent with State law, the Yreka Zoning Code increases the range of zones where ADUs and JADUs are allowed by-right; reduces requirements for setbacks, parking, eliminates a previous minimum lot size requirements, expressly prohibits using ADUs and JADUs as short term rentals (also known as vacation home rentals). Highlights of the City’s current ADU—JADU Ordinance:
• ADUs and JADUs are allowed by-right in R-A, R-1, R-2, R-3, and RPO zones. In these zones single family dwellings and multifamily dwellings (up to fourplexes) are allowed by-right. In the CPO, C-2, CH, CT, and M-1 zones, ADUs and JADUs are permitted by-right when the property has an existing or proposed single- or multifamily dwelling with an approved use permit. • The unit may be rented for periods of no less than 30 days. • There are no connection fees charged to ADUs and JADUs. • The ADU is not intended for sale separate from the primary, although passage of AB 345 (2021) allows an ADU to be sold separately when the accessory dwelling unit or the primary dwelling was built or developed by a qualified nonprofit corporation and the other requirements are met (chaptered at Government Code Section 65852.26).
• The lot needs to contain an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling. When the ADU or JADU is proposed a new single- or multifamily the primary dwelling shall be approved for occupancy prior to occupancy of the ADU/JADU.
186
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-54 January 31, 2023
• Owner-occupancy of the parcel is not a requirement to apply for the construction of an ADU or JADU. In the case of a JADU, however, owner occupancy of the single-family residence in which a JADU will be permitted is required. The owner may occupy either the remaining area of the primary dwelling or the JADU. Disclosure of the JADU occupancy requirement is to be recorded on the property deed. • The ADU may either be attached or detached from the existing or proposed dwelling and located on the same lot. Junior ADUs, however, must be attached to the existing dwelling and located within the living area of the proposed or existing dwelling.

Although the City amended its Zoning Code to align with the requirements of State law thereby removing regulatory barriers to ADU and JADU development, to date the City has not received building permit applications to develop ADUs or JADUs. ADUs and JADUs are types of housing that can be less costly to develop and have less impact on the environment as these they are generally infill development. Securing building permit approval to develop an ADU or JADU in residential zones is nearly assured because of State mandates and oversight that include a 60-day shock clock (AB 3182 (2020)). ADUs and JADUs give homeowners the flexibility to share independent living areas with family members and others, including accommodating intergeneration living arrangements while maintaining privacy. ADUs or JADUs can provide housing for professionals who may prefer to live closer to jobs and amenities rather than spending hours commuting. Ultimately spurring ADU and JADU development can positively contribute more affordable housing to the community’s inventory.

Increasing the number of ADUs and JADUs heavily relies on property owners developing the units. While ADUs and JADUs present an opportunity for property owners, the prospect of adding a dwelling may be daunting for property owners. The process of constructing a dwelling or converting a structure to a dwelling from start to finish may be a barrier for lay-property owners who may have questions about where to put the unit, how much will it cost and how to pay for it, how long it will take to build, who will live it, expected return on investment, etc.

Program HE-5.1.1 seeks to reduce and remove these barriers by promoting and encouraging ADU and JADU development in Yreka by homeowners by developing educational toolkit and launching an outreach campaign.

The objective of Program HE-5.2.1 is to increase the range of allowable ADU housing types by introducing moveable tiny houses as an ADU option which may be a more affordable form of housing. Program HE-5.2.1 commits the City to preparing Zoning amendments that would allow the installation of moveable tiny houses as an ADU. Like traditional construction, a moveable tiny house will be subject to public health and safety standards.

As part of the ordinance, the City may impose objective design standards that are consistent State ADU laws.

Summer 2022, Freddie Mac began offering financing for development of ADUs. The new product is the Freddie Mac Choice Renovation loan, a “for a no-cash-out refinance…to pay off the temporary funding source for ADU construction”. Also, more homeowners will qualify because the anticipated rental income from the ADU can be part of the qualifying income, according to the press release https://sf.freddiemac.com/ content/_assets/resources/pdf/fact-sheet/adu-fact-sheet.pdf, accessed June 29, 2022). In 2022 the State of California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) launch the ADU grant program that provides up to $40,000 to reimburse pre-development and non-recurring closing costs associated with the construction of the ADU for eligible homeowners. According to the CalHFA website, “Predevelopment costs include site prep, architectural designs, permits, soil tests, impact fees, property survey, and energy reports” (https://www .calhfa.ca.gov/adu/index.htm, accessed June 29, 2022). Homeowners have to be low or moderate income in order to be eligible to apply for the CalHFA program. The income limits for Siskiyou county are $159,000. The Freddie Mac and CalHFA programs offer loans and financial assistance directly to the customer. The educational toolkit will include information about these financial resources.

Program HE-5.1.2 commits the City to applying for State funding that allows awarded funds to be used for ADU development, e.g., CalHOME, also collaborating with the County and the other cities for the establishment of a regional housing trust fund that elects to earmark funds for ADU development, and other actions that can improve financial resources available to residents for ADU development. 187
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-55 January 31, 2023
B. Senate Bill 9 (2021) Two Housing Units and Ministerial Lot Split Senate Bill 9 (SB 9) was signed into law in September 2021, and is chaptered at Government Code Sections 65852.21, 664117.7, and 66452.6. SB 9 requires local agencies to ministerially approve a housing development with no more than two primary units in a single-family zone, the subdivision of a parcel in a single-family zone into two parcels, or both. SB 9 facilitates the creation of up to four housing units in the lot area typically used for one single-family home. Key provisions of the law require a local agency to modify or eliminate objective development standards on a project-by-project basis if they would prevent an otherwise eligible lot from being split or prevent the construction of up to two units at least 800 square feet in size. Local implementation of SB 9 does not require cities or counties to adopt an implementing ordinance. Table A-50 itemizes the threshold eligibility requirements of SB 9 and their application specific to the City.

Table A-50
Application of SB 9 (2021) Threshold Eligibility Criteria in the City of Yreka SB 9 (2021) Threshold Criteria City of Yreka

1. The proposed housing development is
located on a parcel within a city, the
boundaries of which include some
portion of either an urbanized area or
urban cluster, as designated by the
United States Census Bureau.

Portions of Yreka are within a US Census designated urbanized area according to the 2010 Census, the most current finalized data. This means parcels and housing developments in the City are eligible to utilize SB 9 (2021) provided the other SB 9 (2021) criteria are met.

2. A parcel must be located in a single
family residential zone
The City’s Single-Family Residential (R-1) zone meets the statutory eligibility criteria. The City’s other residential zoning districts are not eligible for SB 9 (2021).

3. None of the site conditions listed in
Government Code section 65913.4,
subdivision (a)(6)(B-K) are present on the
parcel and do not apply to the parcel.

The conditions that may disqualify a property from using SB 9 include the presence of farmland, wetlands, fire hazard areas, earthquake hazard areas, flood risk areas, conservation areas, wildlife habitat areas, or conservation easements. Program HE-5.1.1 will screen parcels at a programmatic level to identify potential SB 9 eligible parcels.

4. A project is not eligible for SB 9 (2021) if
it is located in a historic district or
property included on the State Historic
Resources Inventory or within a site that
is designated or listed as a city or county
landmark or as a historic property or
district pursuant to a city or county
ordinance.

Parcels located in the City’s historic districts are not eligible for SB 9 (2021).

All the above criteria must be met in order for a housing development and the parcel subject to the development to be able to utilize SB 9. There are anti-displacement requirements and limits on demolition requirements that are evaluated on a project-by-project basis. For SB 9 ministerial lot splits there are additional requirements, with the following being key:
• The applicant must occupy one of the housing units for at least three years 188
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-56 January 31, 2023
• No more than two lots can be created, and the lots are to be of approximately equal lot area provided that one parcel shall not be smaller than 40 percent of the lot area of the original parcel proposed for subdivision.
• Both newly created parcels are no smaller than 1,200 square feet, unless the City elects to adopt an ordinance allowing for a smaller minimum lot size.
• Lots created by SB 9 cannot be resubdivided under the same law.

Like ADUs and JADUs, increasing housing production using SB 9 heavily relies on homeowners taking advantage of the new law and similar barriers are expected. Consequently, Program HE-5.1.1 commits the City to creating a toolkit and launching a public outreach campaign that includes SB 9. It is noted that the City’s current R-1 zone allows duplexes by-right on corner lots and SB 9 will expand this option to a larger population of parcels and provides greater flexibility.

C. Mobile/Manufactured Homes and Parks
In all of the by-right residential zones, a manufactured home installed on a permanent foundation is allowed byright in lieu of conventional single-family dwelling construction subject to the following objective requirements:
• Each manufactured home must have a minimum eave overhang of 16 inches; and • No more than 10 years have elapsed between the date of the home’s manufacture and the date of the application for the issuance of the building permit.

Manufactured homes in conformance with above standards may be installed as an ADU. The City’s allowance and standards for manufactured homes in residential zones are reasonable and have not been an impediment.

There are nine mobilehome parks operating in Yreka according to a June 2, 2022, search of the State Department of Housing and Community Development’s Codes and Standards Automated System (CASAS). Section

16.48.010 of the Yreka Municipal Code (YMC) enumerates that manufactured home parks are permitted in the High-Density Residential (R-3), Commercial Highway (CH), and Light Industrial (M-1) upon approval of a conditional use permit. Although YMC Section 16.48.010 does not enumerate the Commercial Tourist (CT) zone, the language of YMC Section 16.38.060(E), “[a]ll uses allowed in the C-2 and CH zone districts” extends allowance for mobile home parks with an approved conditional use permit to the CT zone. The minimum site area to develop a new mobilehome park is two acres (YMC Section 16.48.030). The layout of a new mobilehome park must meet objective standards for a minimum space size of 3,000 square feet, provide at least 10 feet of separation between homes, not site spaces in setback yard areas, and provide at least 100 square feet of indoor or outdoor recreation area. Parking is to be provided at a ratio of at least two spaces per space and must be improved with a base and double chip and seal. The YMC does not stipulate that both parking spaces be sited adjacent to the unit. There are other standards pertaining to accessory structures and perimeter landscaping.

Although development of a new mobilehome park requires an entitlement, the YMC specifies a number of zones where a park may be sited. There are numerous vacant CH and M-1 zoned parcels. The development standards are generally reasonable and objective. The parking space siting standards are flexible although the ratio may be excessive for a seniors-only park. For an age restricted park, an applicant would have the option to seek a reduction for the number of parking spaces as part of the conditional use permit application pursuant to YMC Section 16.54.140.

Mobilehome parks provide housing that is typically naturally occurring affordable housing. While it is unlikely that existing parks in the City will be closed or converted to another use, to ensure park residents are provided adequate notice, relocation and other assistance should a park be subject to closure or conversion, Program HE189 City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-57 January 31, 2023

4.1.1 commits the City to preparing and adopting a mobilehome park conversion ordinance consistent with Government Code Section 65863.7.

D. Housing for Persons with Disabilities and Persons Experiencing Homelessness
As part of a governmental constraints analysis, housing elements must analyze constraints on the development, maintenance, and improvement of housing for persons with disabilities. This includes a review of zoning and land use policies and practices to ensure:
• Compliance with fair housing laws;
• A provision exists for group homes for six or more persons; • A broad definition of family is included in the zoning code in order to provide occupancy standards specific to unrelated adults, as well as comply with fair housing law; • Siting or separation requirements for licensed residential care facilities do not impact the development and cost of housing for persons with disabilities; and
• The inclusion of alternate residential parking requirements for persons with disabilities.

Reasonable Accommodation Procedures
The City permits certain projections and structures within yard and setback areas. Among the allowances are facilities for access to residential structures by persons with disabilities. For example, ramps or lifts for handicapped accessibility are permitted within yard and setback areas. Such requests are approved administratively unless the site is located with the City’s designated historic district and the nature of the request triggers major design review pursuant to the City’s codified historic preservation overlay zone (see section 4.1.7 below for a summary of design review process). The City adopted reasonable accommodation procedures in July 2013 in accordance with a 4th cycle housing element program. The City readily offers the accommodation procedure to request reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities seeking equal access to housing under the Federal Fair Housing Act and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (the Acts) in the application of zoning laws and other land use regulations, policies, and procedures. An example of a reasonable accommodation is when a municipal jurisdiction allows a deviation from the strict interpretation of zoning standards for someone with a demonstrated need resulting from a disability. Pursuant to state law, the City established appropriate reasonable accommodation procedures to meet the needs of person with disabilities. To make the City’s reasonable accommodation procedures easier to locate and more readily available to the public, Program HE-6.1.2 commits the City reviewing the existing procedures for conformance with applicable federal and state laws, adopting any necessary amendments, and amending the Yreka Municipal Code to incorporate the City’s reasonable accommodation procedures.

Parking standards for houses or group homes for persons with disabilities may be modified through a parking waiver issued by the Planning Commission in accordance with Zoning Code Section 16.54.140(B), when such a waiver is not detrimental to the public health and safety and would not cause an unreasonable hardship. Federal and state law requires the reasonable accommodation process be available to both persons with disabilities and providers of housing for persons with disabilities, however. Moreover, reasonable accommodation findings relate to whether the accommodation is for a protected individual, equal opportunity to use and enjoy a specific dwelling, and not impose an undue financial and administrative burden or a fundamental alteration to the land use or zoning laws, policies, or procedures of the jurisdiction. Zoning Code Section 16.54.140(B) existing language 190
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-58 January 31, 2023
concerning parking exception requests may cause uncertainty in the context of a reasonable accommodation request. Program HE-6.1.2 commits the City to auditing its adopted procedures and updating the procedures as needed to ensure the procedures extend to housing providers and the Zoning Ordinance parking requirements, and that the findings and other elements of the procedures comport with current federal and state law.

Supportive Housing
Supportive housing is defined by Section 65582 of the Government Code as housing with no limit of stay, that is occupied by a target population, and is linked with on- or off-site services that assist the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible, work in the community. The target population is defined by Government Code Section 65582 as persons with low incomes who have one or more disabilities including mental illness, HIV or AIDS, substance abuse, or other chronic health condition, or an individual eligible for services provided pursuant to the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (Division 4.5 [commencing with Section 4500] of the Welfare and Institutions Code) and may include, among other populations, adults, emancipated minors, families with children, elderly persons, young adults aging out of the foster care system, individuals exiting from institutional settings, veterans, and homeless people. The City permits transitional and supportive housing in all the by-right residential zones, that is R-A, R-1, R-2, R-3, and RPO. In the CPO, C-2, CH, and CT zones supportive housing is permitted with a conditional use permit. Both transitional and supportive housing are excluded from the M-1 zone. The definitions of transitional and supportive housing, YMC Sections 16.12.776 and 16.12.773 respectively, comport with the definitions of Government Code Section 65582(g) and 65582(j). It is noted that the YMC Section 16.12.773 definition of supportive housing defines the target population by referencing Health and Safety Code Section (HSC) 53260(d). While the definition of target population in Section 53260(d) of the HSC aligns with the definition at Government Code Section 65582(i), the definition at HSC Section 53260(d) is difficult to locate.

It is difficult to locate because it was part of the California Statewide Supportive Housing Initiative Act which sunset in 2009. Program HE-7.1.1 directs the City to amend the Zoning Code such that the definition of target population is easy for all users to locate and is consistent with Government Code Section 65582(i).

In 2018, AB 2160 was signed into law and added Article 11 “Supportive Housing”, commencing at Section 65650, to Chapter 3, Division 1, Title 7 of the Government Code. AB 2160 applies to a narrowly defined group of housing developments, and complements existing law for supportive housing discussed above. AB 2160 mandates jurisdictions allow qualifying supportive housing developments by-right. More specifically, the new law obligates jurisdictions to permit qualifying supportive housing developments as by-right in zones where multifamily and mixed uses are permitted, including nonresidential zones permitting multifamily uses, when the proposed housing development meets all the requirements. For a housing development to be eligible as a by-right supportive housing development it must be meet all the following:

1. Units within the development are subject to a recorded affordability restriction for 55 years.

2. 100 percent of the units, excluding managers’ units, within the development are restricted to lower income households and are or will be receiving public funding to ensure affordability of the housing to lower income Californians. For purposes of this paragraph, “lower income households” has the same meaning as defined in Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code. The rents in the development shall be set at an amount consistent with the rent limits stipulated by the public program providing financing for the development.

3. At least 25 percent of the units in the development or 12 units, whichever is greater, are restricted to residents in supportive housing who meet criteria of the target population. If the development consists of fewer than 12 units, then 100 percent of the units, excluding managers’ units, in the development shall be restricted to residents in supportive housing.
191
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-59 January 31, 2023

4. The target population of the supportive housing units are persons and families who have experienced homelessness.

5. The developer provides the planning agency with plan for providing supportive services, with documentation demonstrating that supportive services will be provided onsite to residents in the project, and contains all of the information required by Section 65652.

6. Nonresidential floor area shall be used for onsite supportive services in the following amounts:
(A) For a development with 20 or fewer total units, at least 90 square feet shall be provided for onsite supportive services.
(B) For a development with more than 20 units, at least 3 percent of the total nonresidential floor area shall be provided for onsite supportive services that are limited to tenant use, including, but not limited to, community rooms, case management offices, computer rooms, and community kitchens.

7. The developer replaces any dwelling units on the site of the supportive housing development in the manner provided in paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65915.

8. Units within the development, excluding managers’ units, include at least one bathroom and a kitchen or other cooking facilities, including, at minimum, a stovetop, a sink, and a refrigerator.

Jurisdictions may require supportive housing developments to comply with written, objective development standards but only to the extent that the objective standards apply to other multifamily development within the same zone. The number of by-right supportive housing units in a qualifying development is limited to 50 units for cities with populations of less 200,000 and population of less 1,500 persons experiencing homelessness according to the most recent Point in Time Count. Jurisdictions may elect to adopt a policy to allow qualifying housing developments more than 50 by-right supportive housing units.

Group Homes and Community Care Facilities
The City’s definition of group homes and community care facilities includes a wide range of non-medical shelter facilities with supportive services for children, adults, families, and persons with disabilities. Examples include family homes, group care homes, day-care centers for children or adults, foster care homes, and community centers and private clubs in which care is provided. The Zoning Code defines facilities of six or fewer persons as Group Care Home – Small. Facilities serving seven or more persons are defined as Group Care Home – Large.

Group Care Home – Small are principally permitted in R-A, R-1, R-2, R-3 and RPO zones, but need a use permit in CPO, C-2, CH, and CT zones. Group Care Home – Large allowed by-right in R-3 and RPO zones, and are subject to securing a use permit in R-2, CPO, C-2, CH, and CT zones. The City does not have any special requirements for residential care facilities, such as minimum distances between facilities. With a limited number of such group homes, no standards for separation exist in either the General Plan or the Zoning Ordinance.

As discussed above, while the definition of “family” contained in Section 16.12.480 of the Zoning Code seems to be broad and inclusive of tradition and non-traditional living situations, it is constraint because the definition includes an ambiguous requirement for a “common bond by means of blood, marriage, or conscientiously established relations living”. The current definition of “family” excludes clients of a group home subject to California Community Care Facilities Act (Health and Safety Code 1500 et seq.). Program HE-6.1.6 commits Yreka to updating the definition of family to comport with State law.

To remove regulatory barriers and encourage the development of a range of group care facilities in the Medium Density Residential (R-2), High Density Residential (R-3), Commercial Downtown (C-2), Commercial Highway 192
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-60 January 31, 2023
(CH) and CT zones the City will amend the Zoning Code to remove the differentiation between small and large group care facilities and permit group care facilities as a by-right use (Program HE-7.2.1).

For rest homes, nursing homes, convalescent homes, and homes for the aged, the Zoning Code requires one parking space for each employee, plus one space for each four beds. If the need is demonstrated by the applicant, the Planning Commission could modify these standards pursuant to Section 16.54.140(B). Parking requirements are 2 spaces for single-family dwellings and 1.5 spaces per multifamily unit.

Emergency Shelters, Low Barrier Navigation Centers and Transitional Housing 2007 State legislation (Senate Bill 2) requires jurisdictions to identify a zone or zones where emergency shelters will be allowed as permitted uses without a conditional use permit or other discretionary permit. California Health and Safety Code Section 50801 defines an emergency shelter as “housing with minimal supportive services for homeless persons that is limited to occupancy of six months or less by a homeless person. No individual or households may be denied emergency shelter because of an inability to pay.” The zone or zones identified have to have land available to accommodate at least one full-time emergency shelter. The Light Industrial (M-1) zone allows emergency shelters by-right.

There are 50 vacant M-1 parcels that total 460 acres with adjacent sewer and water infrastructure are available to meet this need. The smallest M-1 parcel is 0.11 acres (or 4,800 square feet) and the largest is 44 acres in size.

The average parcel size is 5.6 acres in size. The M-1 zoning is located along Foothill Drive, east of Interstate 5, and in the southern portion of the city between Greenhorn Drive and Moonlit Oaks. The portion of M-1 zoning in the southern portion of the city has access to four transit stops actively used by the Siskiyou County Transit Authority (STAGE). The properties located on Foothill Drive has three stops at the YMCA, Veteran’s Services, and Juvenile Hall. These stops are all approximately one mile apart from each other. The M-1 zone is the primary location for industrial uses historically and currently. Industrial sites are more likely to be considered environmentally hazardous due to the use of acidic, corrosive, and carcinogenic materials that would cause concern for human habitation and interaction. There are six sites listed on the Department of Toxic Substance Control EnviroStor in the City of Yreka. None of these sites are located in the M-1 zones. There is one site listed on the California Department of Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker at 505 Foothill Drive that is in remediation for lead contamination. This site is privately held and considerably dilapidated in condition. This site would not be considered for emergency sheltering due to private property ownership and the condition of the buildings onsite.

In accordance with Program HE.2.1.3 of the City’s 5th cycle element, the City amended the Zoning Code to include the statutory definition of emergency shelters, target population, and the development standards to the extent allowed by statute:

1. The maximum number of beds shall be fifteen.

2. The emergency shelter shall provide on-site parking at a rate of one space for staff plus one space per five allowed occupants. All applicable parking facility standards shall apply per Chapter 16.54.

3. A written management plan is required for all emergency shelters that includes provisions for staff training, neighborhood outreach, transportation, security, client services, and food services.

4. The maximum term of staying at an emergency shelter is six months in a consecutive twelve month period.

Even though YMC limits the number of beds in a shelter bed limit on Following the City’s Zoning Code amendments, AB 139 was enacted in 2019 which established new parking standards for emergency shelters: local 193
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-61 January 31, 2023
governments are to apply a written objective standard that provides sufficient parking to accommodate the staff working in the emergency shelter provided the standards do not require more parking for emergency shelters than other residential or commercial uses within the same zone. As part of Program HE-7.1.1.5, the City will evaluate the current parking standard for emergency shelters, number 2 above, for consistency with the AB 139 standard, and advance amendments if necessary. Although the City amended the Zoning Ordinance in 2014 to permit emergency shelters in M-1 by-right, there are currently no permanent shelters operating inside City limits.

As discussed above in section 3.3.7 above, there has been an observable increase in the number of persons experiencing homelessness in the City, although there is not an official count specific to Yreka. Existing services in the City and other nearby cities are identified in Table A-28. There is an unsanctioned camp located on undeveloped City-owned land in the vicinity of the College of the Siskiyous and Siskiyou County behavior health services. A May 2022, tent survey conducted by members of the NorCal Continuum of Care indicates there are approximately 22 tent camps at this location, with approximately 25 to 50 residents. Portable toilets and regular trash pick-up are provided to the camp. Yreka is applying for Project Homekey funds to convert a local hotel into 24 units of permanent housing and 12 pallet shelters for persons and families who are homeless or at risk. The project will make a significant positive improvement in housing.

Program HE-7.4.2 commits the City to exploring whether declaring a shelter crisis pursuant to Government Code Section 8698 may provide more options to assist people experiencing homelessness in the community. The City may consider whether the benefits of declaring a shelter crisis pursuant to Government Code Section 8698 et seq. offset the added responsibilities. Some of the benefits include:
• City immunity from liability for ordinary negligence in the provision of emergency housing • provisions of any state or local regulatory statute, regulation, or ordinance prescribing standards of housing, health, or safety are suspended to the extent that strict compliance would in any way prevent, hinder, or delay the mitigation of the effects of the shelter crisis. A city may, in place of such standards, enact municipal health and safety standards to be operative during the housing emergency consistent with ensuring minimal public health and safety.

However, a declaration would new add new responsibilities to the City:
• Annual reporting to the State
• The obligation to develop a plan to address the shelter crisis, including, but not limited to, the development of homeless shelters and permanent supportive housing, as well as onsite supportive services. The plan must also address transitioning residents from homeless shelters to permanent housing. The plan must be developed and made available to the public by July 1 of the year following the shelter crisis declaration.

Transitional housing is defined in Section 50675.2 of the Health and Safety Code as rental housing for stays of at least six months but where the units are recirculated to another program recipient after a set period. It may be designated for various users including a homeless individual or family transitioning to permanent housing. This housing can take many structural forms such as group housing and multifamily units and may include supportive services to allow individuals to gain necessary life skills in support of independent living. In accordance with Program HE.2.1.3 of the City’s 5th cycle element, the City amended the Zoning Code to include the statutory definition of transitional housing. Transition housing is a by-right use in the R-A, R-1, R-2, R-3, and RPO zones.

Transitional housing is not subject to standards that do not apply to other residential development in the same zones.
194
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-62 January 31, 2023
Assembly Bill (AB) 101 was enacted in 2019 requires that a Low Barrier Navigation Center development be a use allowed by-right in mixed-use zones and nonresidential zones permitting multifamily uses if it meets specified requirements. of Government Code Section 65662 et seq. A low barrier navigation center is statutorily defined in Government Code Section 65660(a), and is a Housing First shelter focused on moving individuals experiencing homelessness to services and housing. Jurisdictions are to expedite navigation center applications in accordance with the statute. Although AB 101 is scheduled to sunset January 1, 2027, given the extent of California’s crisis of housing and homelessness, it would not be unexpected that the Legislature will extend the sunset date. The City does not currently comply with this requirement. Program HE-7.1.1.2 commits the City to update the zoning code to allow low barrier navigation centers by right in areas zoned for mixed use as well as nonresidential zones permitting multifamily uses.

Single-Room Occupancy Units
Single-room occupancy units (SROs) are often the most affordable type and may serve as an entry point for individuals who have experienced homelessness to access permanent housing. In 2014 the City adopted Ordinance No. 837 consistent with Program HE.2.1.2. SROs are defined as a compact dwelling unit with limited cooking and living facilities that is the primary residence of its occupant(s) and is within a multiple-unit structure pursuant to Section 16.12.755 Yreka Municipal Code. As indicated in Table A-49, SROs are conditionally permitted in C-2, CH and CT zones. The following minimum criteria apply to SROs:

1. Tenancy. Tenancy of single-room occupancy residential units shall not be less than thirty days.

2. Tenants per room. Each unit shall accommodate a maximum of two persons.

3. Maximum unit size. No unit may exceed four hundred square feet.

4. Common facilities. Single-room occupancy residential unit facilities shall provide individual or shared bathing facilities and may provide individual or shared kitchen facilities.

5. Laundry facilities. Common laundry facilities shall be provided at a rate of one washer and dryer per ten units, with a minimum of one washer and dryer.

6. Manager's Office or Unit. An on-site management office or manager's unit shall be provided.

7. Parking. One parking space per unit is required. All applicable parking facility standards shall apply per Chapter 16.54.

8. Storage. Each unit shall have a separate closet.

The City has yet to receive an application to develop an application to develop SRO units or convert an existing structure to an SRO since adoption of Ordinance No. 837. To reduce regulatory barriers for SRO development contemplated in close proximity to services, e.g., public transit and grocery stores, Program HE-7.3.1 commits the City to preparing amendments that would allow by-right SRO developments in C-2, CH, and CT zones that are within a distance a person can reasonably walk to services (e.g., a quarter mile), and that meets other applicable zoning requirements for SROs. SROs proposed at a greater walking distance will be subject to a use permit. Nonetheless, the City continues to work with non-profit providers for services and housing, to identify and develop sites for new construction SROs and conversion of existing structures.

E. Housing for Employees and Farmworkers
The Yreka Municipal Code distinguishes between small and large employee housing:
• Small employee housing: housing for employees for six or fewer persons in a single family home [YMC Section 16.12.447].
195
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-63 January 31, 2023
• Large Employee Housing: housing for employees consisting of no more than thirty-six beds in a group quarters or twelve units or spaces designed for use by a single-family or household [YMC Section

16.12.445].

As shown in Table A-49, Employee Housing – Small is permitted by-right in the R-A, R-1, R-2, R-3, and RPO zones, and requires a conditional use permit in CPO, C-2, CH, and CT zones. Employee Housing – Large is permitted byright in the R-A, R-2, R-3, and RPO zones. City requires a conditional use permit for Employee Housing – Large in CPO, C-2, CH, and CT zones. The CUP process is in place to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses.

Conditions of approval vary from project to project, but most likely they will contain provisions for landscaping, type of fencing, driveway locations, compatible lighting, and recreational facilities. The range of zoning districts permitting by-right small and large employee housing is greater than the zone districts permitting by-right multifamily due to inclusion of the R-A zone. Although the City’s vacant inventory contains 46 R-A zoned parcels comprising 649 acres (see Table A-46), there are only two R-A zone parcels with available water and sewer service within 100 feet of the parcel. This indicates the infrastructure development cost for Employee Housing – Large may still be high because of the small number of parcels appropriately zoned for large scale employee housing.

While the 5th cycle housing element concluded that the use permit process did not constrain the development of employee and farmworker housing, there are additional time, costs, and risk inherent to the use permit process, as discussed above. Larger employers have communicated to the City that the lack of workforce housing is a deterrent to business expansion. Program HE-2.1.4 commits the City to preparing amendments to the Zoning Code to allow small and large employee housing by-right CPO, C-2, CH, and CT zones when objective performance standards related to proximity to job centers and services are met.

AB 1783 amended the Employee Housing Act (EHA) in 2019. One of the highlights of the enacted legislation is to require jurisdictions provide streamlined, ministerial approval for qualifying agricultural employee housing developments. For an employee housing development to exercise the streamline, ministerial approval process, the site must meet a list of criteria, and one criterium is the development is located on land designated as agricultural in the applicable city or county general plan. Yreka’s General Plan and Zoning Code does not have lands designated as agricultural. The City does not have lands designated for agriculture per adopted land use regulations:
• City of Yreka General Plan 2002-2022, adopted December 18, 2003: the Land Use Element’s description of the Residential Agricultural (RA) land use designation is "Large lot single family residential, either by design or by incorporation of previously developed county areas. Limited agricultural use due to higher residential density than conventional agriculture" (page 1-7). • Yreka Municipal Code, Table 1 of Section 16.16.10 itemizes the City’s zoning districts, and there are no agricultural zoning districts listed. While the R-A allows agricultural uses in conjunction with residential uses, it is designated as a residential zoning district.

The City has determined it does not have lands designated as agricultural; therefore, the provisions of AB 1783 do not apply.

4.1.4. OTHER LOCALLY ADOPTED ORDINANCES THAT DIRECTLY IMPACT THE COST AND

SUPPLY OF HOUSING
Although the City adopted the 2010 California Building Code (CBC) for its code requirements for the construction of new housing, the City applies the current CBC and is in the process of updating local ordinance. The City deviates from the CBC only in the case of requirements for wind load and snow load (i.e., the City has a higher standard for roofing due to local conditions). Because the more stringent standards apply only in these two cases 196
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-64 January 31, 2023
and to protect public health and safely, the application of the CBC does not pose a significant constraint to the production or improvement of housing in Yreka.

Similar to CBC, the City of Yreka uses the current City of Redding Construction Standards, although the City’s officially adopted standards are the 2007 iteration. “The City of Redding Construction Standards are provided for use by developers, engineers, contractors, property owners, local agencies, and operations staff to communicate the minimum and typical requirements for infrastructure within the City of Redding and area of influence”, according to the webpage (https://www.cityofredding.org/departments/public-works/engineering/constructionstandards, accessed June 29, 2022). Exceptions and modifications to Redding’s Construction Standards are adopted from time to time by the Director of Public Works of the City of Yreka regarding specific standards as needed. Although subject to change, these standards are summarized below. • Local Streets:

Right-of-way: 50–70 feet, 60 feet typical Pavement width: 36 feet Curb, gutter, and 4-foot sidewalk required
• Minor Arterial:

Right-of-way: 66–80 feet Pavement width: 40 feet
Curb, gutter, and 4-foot sidewalk required
• Streetlights required on public streets, but not within Planned Developments or on acre or larger lots • Water, sewer, and fire hydrants are to be provided as required by the Director of Public Works. • Manholes: 460-foot spacing with 12–30-inch pipe, 50-foot spacing with 33—59-inch pipe • Curb, gutter, and a 4-foot sidewalk are required for any new building and/or improvement amounting to $20,000 or more in value. Sidewalks are 4-foot minimum in residential districts.

While all development-related improvements add to the cost of housing, it has been not been documented that the City’s adopted standards serve as a constraint to the construction of affordable housing, as evidenced by the number of affordable units that have been added to the city’s housing stock over the past ten years. It is acknowledged, however, that housing projects with units assured to be affordable typically apply for and receive funding to offsetthe costs associated with constructing and implementing all regulatory requirements that apply to a project. It may be more challenging to directly defray the costs associated with implementing regulatory requirements for unassisted residential development. The Housing Element includes several programs that aim to reduce the costs to development housing:
• Removing the use permit requirement for housing configured as five or more units. • The residential technical assistance program to assist lay property owners for development of ADUs and SB 9 housing developments.
• Committing the City to seeking funding for an owner-occupied rehab program. • Encouraging collaboration with Siskiyou County and the other cities to develop a regional housing trust fund.

Yreka does not have a growth control ordinance or voter-approved initiative or referendum restricting growth or capping the number of housing units. Nor does the City have a short-term rental ordinance. The City does not anticipate the need for a short-term rental ordinance because Yreka is not a visitor destination whereas other 197
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-65 January 31, 2023
communities, especially in the southern part of the county, receive more destination tourists. A May 17, 2022, search of www.airbnb.com yielded four properties in Yreka or in proximity, and a similar search performed on May 28th yielded nine rental properties. A similar search of www.vrbo.com on May 17, 2022, indicated there were four rental properties; then a May 28th search indicated five available rental properties. Visually it appears some of the same properties were listed on both platforms.

4.1.5. WATER AND SEWER PRIORITY
The City of Yreka is the sole provider of water and sewer service within the city and has sufficient water and sewer connections and capacity to service new development. The City does not have policies or procedures, written or otherwise, that would prevent any level of income unit from connecting to sewer and water services.

Government Code Section 65589.7(a), requires cities to deliver their adopted housing elements to the water and sewer providers which are to grant priority for service connections to proposed developments that include units affordable to lower-income households. Pursuant to this statute, within thirty (30) days of adoption of its 2023- 2031 Housing Element, the Planning Department will be internally distributed to the City of Yreka Department of Public Works, along with a summary of its Regional Housing Needs Allocation. In compliance with subparagraph (b) of Government Code Section 65589.7, this Housing Element includes program HE-1.1.3, a new program, that commits the City to establishing written policies and procedures to prioritize water and sewer connections for housing development that include lower income units within five years of adoption of the 2023- 2031 Housing Element.

4.1.6. DENSITY BONUS
In 2014 the City adopted Ordinance No. 837, the City’s Density Bonus Ordinance. State Density Bonus Law (SBDL), commencing at Section 65915 of the California Government Code, however, has been amended nearly annually beginning in 2017. Subparagraphs (a)(1) and (a)(3)(A) of Government Code Section 65915 obligates jurisdictions to adopt a local density bonus implementing ordinance, along with procedures and timelines for processing a density bonus application. In the event a local ordinance has not been adopted, the jurisdiction is not relieved from complying with SDBL. In accordance with Program HE-2.1.3.2.a, the City will review Ordinance No. 837 for consistency with State Density Bonus Law and will advance amendments to the City Council for adoption as needed. Since the City’s 2014 adoption of Ordinance No. 837, the City has not received any density requests from housing developers. To increase implementation of the City’s density bonus and other regulatory and financial incentives and concessions, the City will prepare and publish materials informing property owners and housing developers of the available programs for qualified housing developments in accordance with Program HE-2.1.3.3.

4.1.7. DESIGN REVIEW
All of the City lying within the original 1919 Yreka town site is designated historic district. Development within the district is subject to regulations that seek to balance preservation and enhancement of certain improvements that are representative of the City’s cultural, artistic, social, economic, political, architectural, and engineering history and heritage with the public health, safety and general welfare. Within the historic district, new construction and actions to remove or alter any improvement that is a designated landmark or landmark site must first obtain a permit from the City’s. The applicant’s proposal must provide evidence that the proposal would not detrimentally alter, destroy or adversely affect any exterior architectural feature, specifically emphasizes the preservation of architectural styles existing in the area of the city prior to 1910, and emphasizes other distinct and noteworthy architectural styles reflecting the phases of Yreka's history, and for new construction the exterior will be compatible with the external appearance of other existing improvements, and will not adversely affect those nearby buildings and structures. 198
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-66 January 31, 2023

4.1.8. PERMITTING PROCEDURES AND PROCESS, FEES, AND TIMES A. By-Right Residential Development
The Planning Director is delegated authority to approve, conditionally approve both single family and multifamily residential development that meets the standards for density/intensity, site development, and permitted uses of the applicable zoning district. YMC Section 16.52 – Site Plan Review identifies the required content of the site plan, standards for landscaping, and requirements for street dedications and improvements, and types of development, e.g., residential, commercial, and industrial, are subject to the requirement for Site Plan Review.

The purpose of the Site Plan Review is to enable the building and planning departments to make a finding that the proposed development is in conformity with the intent and provisions of this title [Title 16] and to guide the building department in the issuance of building permits. To facilitate the Site Plan Review process, the City has developed application form that itemizes the requirements. Housing proposals that conform with the zoning do not trigger a public hearing. According to the City’s “Planning Department Standard Review” form published on their website, the typical review period is four weeks. To facilitate the Site Plan Review process, Planning staff is available for input and questions from provide applications who are developing applications. According to Planning staff, the Site Plan Review process is not a deterrent to development because staff regularly reviews and updates their public information forms, and requests feedback on possible process improvements from the applicants.

It is noted the YMC contains two notable exceptions related to nonconformity that are beneficial for residential development. First, legally created nonconforming lots (nonconforming with respect to minimum lot area, width, and/or depth) that are planned and zoned for residential uses are permitted to be developed with residential uses as provided by the zoning without the need for a discretionary permit pursuant to Section

16.59.030 YMC. Although residential development must still demonstrate conformity to the development standards of the applicable zoning district, the YMC allows nonconforming to be developed by right. Section

16.59.050 allows any existing nonconforming building or structure that is rehabilitated under a housing rehabilitation program for the benefit of low-income persons may be repaired, reconstructed, or structurally altered without being brought into full compliance with the regulations set forth in this code with regard to setbacks, off-street parking, and street improvements so long as the footprint of the existing building is not expanded.

Only development that is located within the City’s designated historic district is subject to design review, which is discussed above in Section 4.1.7.

B. Conditional Use Permit Process and Findings
Residential development identified as a conditional use by the applicable zoning district requires a conditional use permit (CUP) that must be applied for and approved before the building permit can be issued. For CUP applications, the City offers applicants a courtesy Pre-Application review process to provide an initial review of preliminary or conceptual applications by interdepartmental staff. These meetings are intended to provide a better understanding of the City’s permitting processes and, through early consultation, troubleshoot project issues for potentially complex development proposals, but is not an application completeness review.

In accordance with the Permit Streamlining Act (PSA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), all applications for discretionary housing projects are reviewed for completeness and applicability of CEQA within thirty (30) days of submittal to the City. For this phase, the City Planning Department, other City Departments, and other outside agencies, as necessary, review project application and respond with conditions of approval, any issues, or a request for additional information. The Planning Department collects issues, comments, or conditions of approval from reviewers and provides an Incomplete Letter, Complete letter, Issues Letter, and/or 199
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-67 January 31, 2023
conditions of approval to applicant within thirty days from the date of submittal. Project applicants are also notified of the City’s preliminary CEQA determination and if the proposal may qualify for a CEQA exemption or not based on the submitted information and comments received from reviewing agencies. Submitted applications revisions restart the 30-day review clock described above.

The Planning Commission is delegated the authority to grant conditional use permits per YMC Section 16.44.040.

YMC Section 16.44.020 describes the City’s CUP application and review process. According to the "Planning Department Standard Permit Review Times” procedures published on the City’s website, all manner of CUPs take approximately four to six months to process from the date of submittal to the Planning Commission hearing. In most cases, the Planning Commission is able to conditionally approve CUPs for residential development with a single public hearing. Again, only development that is located within the City’s designated historic district is subject to design review: see Section 4.1.7 above for more information. Section 16.44.040 itemizes the finding the planning commission must make to grant a conditional use permit:
(a) The proposed use or feature, at the size and intensity contemplated and at the proposed location, will provide a development that is necessary or desirable for, and compatible with, the transportation and service facilities, the neighborhood, and the community. The following shall be considered to make this finding:
(1) The intensity of activity in the district is not such that allowing the larger use will be likely to foreclose the location of other needed neighborhood-servicing uses in the areas; and (2) The proposed use will serve the neighborhood, in whole or in significant part, and the nature of the use requires a larger size in order to function; and
(3) The building in which the use is to be located is designed in discrete elements which respect the scale of development in the district.
(b) Such use of feature as proposed will not adversely impact the health, safety, convenience or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property, improvements or potential development in the vicinity, with respect to aspects including but not limited to the following:
(1) The nature of the proposed site, including its size and shape, and the proposed size, shape, and arrangement of structures, so that the subject site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the use and related structures being proposed; (2) The accessibility and traffic patterns for persons, non-motorized vehicular traffic, and vehicles, the type and volume of such traffic, the adequacy of proposed off-street parking and loading, and of proposed alternatives to off-street parking;
(3) The safeguards afforded to prevent noxious or offensive emissions such as noise, glare, dust, and odor; (4) Treatment given, as appropriate, to such aspects as landscaping, screening, open spaces, parking and loading areas, service areas, lighting, and signs; and
(5) Will not be injurious to property or improvement in the neighborhood. (c) Such use or feature as proposed will comply with the applicable provisions of this code and will not adversely affect the implementation of the general plan; and
(d) Such use or feature are not contrary to the stated purpose of the applicable zoning district, specific plan, development regulations, and performance standards as proposed and will provide development that is in conformity with the stated purpose of the applicable zoning district, specific plan, and planned unit development. 200
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-68 January 31, 2023
(e) That adequate public facilities and services, such as public access, water, sanitation, and public utilities are available to serve the site or will be made available concurrent with the proposed development. (f) Such use or feature as proposed will not reduce or prevent the expansion of the city’s residential unit inventory.

Once the designated hearing officer takes action on the discretionary housing permit, the City files either a notice of determination or exemption in accordance with 15075(d) or 15062(c)(2), respectively, of the CEQA Guidelines.

As discussed above in Section 4.1.2, subsection titled “Configuration of Multifamily Housing”, the City recognizes that the discretionary permitting process increases the costs, time, and risk to developers of multifamily housing or other types of housing that requires a CUP, which in turn diminishes the production of multifamily housing development. Programs HE-1.2.1 directs the amend the YMC to allow by-right multifamily development that is configure as more than fourplexes in R-3, R-2, and RPO zoning districts. Program HE-1.2.1 also specifies that development and performance standards of the R-3, R-2, and RPO must be objective. Program HE-1.3.3 commits the City to offering a up-zoning program to leverage SB 10 (2021). Program HE-1.3.3 also commits the City to underwriting the rezoning application and processing costs for property owners who volunteer qualifying properties for up-zoning.

C. Development and Processing Fees
Many of the areas zoned for higher-density projects currently have on- and off-site improvements such as water and sewer connections, streets, and sidewalks in place so there are no additional requirements. For other areas, however, the City requires developers to construct improvements and/or pay fees to help deter the costs of providing infrastructure, public facilities, and services. Impact fees that apply to new residential single-family and multifamily construction are listed in Table A-51. The City also collects fees from developers to help cover the costs of planning and processing permits. Processing fees are calculated based on average staff time and material costs required to process a particular type of case. Planning and processing fees are shown in Table A-52.

Table A-51
Municipal Services, Impact, and Connection Fees
Facility Fee perDwelling Unit(1)
Public Facilities $1,510
StormDrainage $99
Parks and Recreation $1,821
CitywideStreets $539
WaterSystem $5,132
WastewaterSystem $1,486
School Impact ($2.31 per sq. ft.)(2) $3,465
Total $14,052
Source: City of Yreka Municipal Code, Section 11.23.090 Imposition of Fees. (1) Fees are for informational purposes only and are subject to change. (2) Fees as of 2013.

The City’s impact fees are somewhat higher than other small cities in the region, which have been slow to adopt or update fee programs due to declining populations. Being one of the few cities in the county to experience sustained growth, the City of Yreka’s fees for a typical 1,500-square-foot single-family approximately $15,550, and $15,750 for a multifamily dwelling. As illustrated in 0, this typical fee total is approximately 3 percent of the average new house construction cost and 2.6 percent of the average new multifamily unit construction cost. 201
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-69 January 31, 2023
While these costs will likely be passed on to the ultimate product consumer, thus impacting housing prices, these requirements are deemed necessary to maintain the quality of life desired by city residents.

Table A-52
Planning Permit Fees
Fee(1)
PreliminaryEnvironmentalReview $50
NegativeDeclaration and Mitigated Negative Declaration $2,354.75 Environmental ImpactReport $3271.00
County Clerk FilingNotice ofDetermination Processing Fee $50 plus CDFGfees (2) Annexation $2,192 despot/cost
General PlanAmendment $2,192
HistoricDistrict Minor Exterior Alteration Permit $145
Historic District Major Exterior Alteration Permit $2,192 Rezone $2,192 deposit/cost
Conditional Use Permit $2,192 deposit/cost
Site Plan Review $2,192
Variance $2,192deposit/cost
Property Line Adjustment $4,661
Minor Subdivision (4 or less lots) $2,192 deposit/cost
Major Subdivision (5 or more lots) $2,192 deposit/cost
Final Parcel Map $4,661 deposit/cost
Map Extension $200
Appeals 15% of permit or minimum of $500
County Clerk Processing Fee $50 actual cost
Source: Yreka Planning Department 2022 Notes:

1. Fees are for informational purposes only and are subject to change.

2. In the event that a project’s effect on natural resources or wildlife is other than negligible, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) requires an additional fee of $3,539.25 if an EIR is prepared or $2548.00 a negative declaration (DFW’s filing fees beginning January 1, 2022). These fees are subject to change, and the applicant is responsible for payment of the fees in full.

If required, a permit cannot be issued until such time as the fee is paid.

Table A-53
Total Processing and Impact Fees for Typical Single- and Multifamily Units Housing Type Total Fees
Estimated
DevelopmentCost per
Unit
EstimatedProportion of
Fees toDevelopment Costs
per Unit
Single-FamilyUnit $15,550 $576,555 3%
Multifamily (per unit) $15,750 $612,000 2.6%
Sources: www.costtobuild.net, accessed 2022 plus land costs for a 0.32 acre parcel per section 4.2.1 “Land Costs” below. Estimate for Typicalsingle-family unit estimated at 1,500 square feet.

Siskiyou Crossroads, 2021
202
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-70 January 31, 2023
D. Permit Processing Times
The time involved in processing development applications can become a constraint to affordable housing development. In Yreka, most development applications for single-family and multifamily developments take between three and four weeks to process provided no discretionary approvals are needed. If an applicant proposes developments that require discretionary review, such as a use that requires a CUP, the processing time can extend to two months regardless of whether the development is a single-family or multifamily project. For example, the Shasta Courtyards multifamily housing development and Emerald Pointe Apartments both required use permits, each of which took approximately two months to process. Table A-54 lists the typical review times for each type of permit or approval process in Yreka. These review periods do not present constraints to development, as some review is needed to ensure the maintenance of health and safety standards.

The Planning Department encourages developers to submit applications concurrently where possible to minimize the total processing time and related cost for a project.

Table A-54
Planning Processing Times
Type of Approval or Permit TypicalProcessing Time
MinisterialReview 2 to 4 weeks
ConditionalUse Permit(CUP) 4 to 6 months
ZoneChange 4 to 6 months
General PlanAmendment 6 to 18 months
Site Plan Review 45 days
Parcel Maps 2 to 4 months
Initial Study 6 to 8 months
Environmental ImpactReport 12 to 18 months
Source: City of Yreka Planning Department 2022

4.1.9. BUILDING CODE AND ENFORCEMENT
The City adopted the California Building Code (CBC) for its code requirements and deviates from it only in the case of requirements for wind load and snow load (i.e., the City has a higher standard for roofing due to local conditions). Because the more stringent standards apply only in these two cases and to protect public health and safely, the enforcement of the CBC does not pose a significant constraint to the production or improvement of housing in Yreka.

Code enforcement typically occurs when the building inspector is processing other permits on the site, or when complaints are filed. The Building Department staff works with the County Health Department when the complaint appears to be a matter of both health and safety.

Most complaints come from renters who have complaints against their landlord. The inspection may reveal building or health code violations that are then written up with a timeline for correction and follow-up inspections. If there are no code violations, but other non-code situations occur, the renter is given a question and answer sheet prepared by the California Department of Consumer Affairs, which helps to define the renter’s rights and options in the matter. Complaints in mobile home parks are referred to the enforcement section of HCD.

The City adopted Ordinance #770 on June 5, 2003, which establishes a process for abating public nuisances. The types of nuisances defined in the ordinance vary from unsightly storage and debris on a parcel to elements of 203
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-71 January 31, 2023
disrepair of buildings. Enforcement of Ordinance #770 is a post-construction activity and does not constrain the development of lower-income housing.

4.1.10. ARTICLE XXXIV OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
California Constitution, Article XXXIV (Article 34) the Public Housing Project Law is a barrier to the development of affordable rental housing in the City, and inhibits the ability of the City to partner with affordable housing developers. Article 34 was added to California’s Constitution by a voter initiative (Proposition 10) in 1950. Article 34 prevents any city or county from developing, constructing, or acquiring in any manner low-rent housing projects until a ballot measure is approved by a simple majority of qualified voters. Article 34 applies to lowincome rental projects developed by private persons or non-profits using certain types of public financial assistance, in addition to publicly-owned low-income rental projects. Article 34 significantly inhibits affordable housing development by creating uncertainty for the City and the developer, in addition to increasing administrative costs for the development of affordable housing projects. In California Finance Agency v. Elliott (1976) 17 Cal.3d 575, 588, the California Supreme Court held that where an agency “extensive[ly] participat[es]” or “closely participates, or assists, in the development of a low-cost housing project” it requires Article 34 authorization (81 Ops. Cal.Atty.Gen. 308 (1981)). Consequently, when a local agency or developer seeks state funding for a housing project in the City, the funding application must be accompanied by an attorney prepared legal opinion documenting how the project’s ownership, financing, agreements, and the nature and extent of involvement by the City are not subject to the local election requirement of Article 34, if the facts support this conclusion. The legal opinion must be detailed and supported by specific legal arguments grounded by the Constitution, statute and/or case law. Typically, the project proponent bears the costs associated with preparation of the opinion which may be as much as $30,000 to $50,000. While there have been several attempts to repeal Article 34 statewide, these attempts have not been successful to date. It is noted that voter passage of an Article 34 authorization does not relieve affordable housing projects from compliance with the City’s land use or building requirements or those of the state or federal oversight agencies. In other words, a jurisdiction’s general plan, zoning, and other land use regulations are not altered or diminished by a local Article 34 authorization. In the event a statewide ballot initiative to repeal Article 34 does not pass before the 2028 General Election, Program HE-1.3.6 encourages the City to advance a local ballot measure.

4.2. NON-GOVERNMENTAL

4.2.1. LAND COSTS
The cost of raw, developable land creates a direct impact on the cost for a new home and is considered a possible constraint. A higher cost of land raises the price of a new home. Therefore, developers sometimes seek to obtain City approvals for the largest number of lots allowable on a parcel of land. Residential land costs in Yreka as of July 2022 are shown in Table A-55. The following list of properties was gathered through the Internet sites including Zillow.com. Single-family land prices ranged from $13,770 per acre to $113,028 per acre; multifamily land prices ranged from $128,947 per acre to $271,278 per acre. Although there is a wide range in price per acre, the average costs are generally higher than they were in 2013.

Table A-55
Yreka Vacant Land Costs
Zone Acres Price Price per Acre
R-1 0.32 $27,755 $86,734
R-1 0.30 $26,544 $88,480
R-1 0.14 $16,050 $113,028
204
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-72 January 31, 2023
Zone Acres Price Price per Acre
R-1 14.45 $199,000 $13,770
R-3-12 0.38 $49,000 $128,947
R-3-12 0.23 $62,394 $271,278
R-3-16 0.27 $53,493 $198,122
Source: Zillow 2022

4.2.2. CONSTRUCTION AND LABOR COSTS
Factors that affect the cost of building a house include the type of construction, materials, site conditions, finishing details, amenities, and structural configuration. An Internet source of construction cost data (www.costtobuild.net) estimates the cost of a single-story four-cornered home in Yreka to be approximately $366 per square foot. This cost estimate is based on a 1,500-square-foot house of good-quality construction including a two-car garage and central heating and air conditioning. The total construction costs excluding land costs are estimated at approximately $548,800 (as of June 2022), which is nearly $190,000 more than the May 2022 median home sales price in the county.

As the cost of labor or materials in Yreka continues to rise, it becomes more and more difficult to develop or rehabilitate housing in the City. This is considered a substantial constraint to the development of additional housing units.

4.2.3. AVAILABILITY OF FINANCING
The cost of borrowing money to finance the construction of housing or to purchase a house affects the amount of affordably priced housing in Yreka. Fluctuating interest rates can eliminate many potential homebuyers from the housing market or render a housing project that could have been developed at lower interest rates infeasible.

When interest rates decline, sales increase. The reverse has been true when interest rates increase. Over the past decade, there has been a dramatic growth in alternative mortgage products, including graduated mortgages and variable rate mortgages. These types of loans allow homeowners to take advantage of lower initial interest rates and to qualify for larger home loans. However, variable rate mortgages are not ideal for low- and moderateincome households that live on tight budgets. In addition, the availability of variable rate mortgages has declined in the last few years due to greater regulation of housing lending markets. Variable rate mortgages may allow lower-income households to enter into homeownership, but there is a definite risk of monthly housing costs rising above the financial means of that household. Therefore, the fixed interest rate mortgage remains the preferred type of loan, especially during periods of low, stable interest rates. Table A-56 illustrates interest rates as of June 2022. The table presents both the interest rate and annual percentage rate (APR) for different types of home loans. The interest rate is the percentage of an amount of money which is paid for its use for a specified time, and the APR is the yearly percentage rate that expresses the total finance charge on a loan over its entire term. The APR includes the interest rate, fees, points, and mortgage insurance and is therefore a more complete measure of a loan's cost than the interest rate alone. However, the loan's interest rate, not its APR, is used to calculate the monthly principal and interest payment.

Table A-56
Interest Rates
Interest APR
Conforming
30-yearfixed 5.625% 5.792%
15-yearfixed 4.625% 4.861%
205
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-73 January 31, 2023
5-year adjustable rate 4.750% 4.349%
Source: www.wellsfargo.com,June 2022
Notes: Rates based on a $400,000 purchase price, 20% down payment, and a Good credit score of 759.

4.3. HOUSING RESOURCES AND OPPORTUNITIES

4.3.1. EXISTING AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Yreka currently has eight affordable multifamily projects, with the Karuk Homes I project completed in 2017.

Altogether these eight affordable housing projects provide 369 affordable units. The projects are summarized in Table A-45. Three of the projects are subsidized through HUD, and one is subsidized through the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Agency. HUD currently provides “project-based” subsidies in Yreka through its Section 8 and Section 202 programs, and USDA Rural Development provides subsidies through its Section 515 program. The remaining three projects receive indirect government subsidies through participation in the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program administered through HUD. Although not a direct federal subsidy, LIHTC provides tax incentives for the utilization of private equity in the development of affordable housing.

In 2022 entitlements and building permits were approved for the affordable multifamily development Siskiyou Crossroads. Siskiyou Crossroads is a 50-unit multifamily complex on four acres designed for special needs and general low-income populations. All units will be affordable to the target population earning no more than 60 percent of the area median income. There will be no market rate units. Twenty-four of the units will be operated as permanent supportive housing and assisted with funding from the State’s No Place Like Home program. As Siskiyou Crossroads is under construction it is not included in Table A-57. The units are expected to be ready for occupancy by 2024.

Table A-57
Assisted Multifamily Units
Name Expiration Date
Total Affordable
Units
Senior
Units
Family
Units
Funding
Agency/Program
Deer Creek Apts.,
1060 E.Deer Creek Way
2023 35 35 0 HUD, Sec. 8
JuniperTerrace,
800 Jasper Way
2055 54 50 4 USDARural
Development
Siskiyou Valley Apts.,
409 Bruce Street
2039 36 0 36 USDARural
Development
ShadowsGardenApts.,
402 Turre Street
2039 46 6 40 HUD Sec. 8; USDA
Rural Development
SierraVista Retirement
Ctr., 885 Sierra Vista Dr.
2037 29 29 0 HUD Sec. 202
ShastaCourtyards,
400 FoothillDrive
2051 60 0 60 Low-Income
Housing Tax Credit
206
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-74 January 31, 2023
Emerald Point Apts.,
450N. FoothillDrive
2052 80 80 0 Low-Income
Housing Tax Credit
Karuk Homes I,
1832 Apsuun
2069 29 Low-Income
Housing Tax Credit
Source: 6th Cycle Housing Element Data Package, Siskiyou County, State California Department of Housing and Community Development, December 2021 retirement

4.3.2. ANALYSIS OF ASSISTED HOUSING PROJECTS AT RISK
In 1989, the California Government Code was amended to include a requirement that jurisdictions identify and develop a program in their housing elements for the preservation of assisted, affordable multifamily units.

Subsequent amendments have clarified the scope of the analysis to include units developed pursuant to inclusionary housing and density bonus programs. In the preservation analysis, localities are required to provide an inventory of assisted, affordable units that are eligible to convert within ten years of the beginning of the housing element planning period. In the City of Yreka there are currently 35 units in the Deer Creek Apartments at high risk of conversion to market rates during the 2022-2030 planning period.

4.3.3. LOSS OF ASSISTED HOUSING
Affordability covenants and deed restrictions are typically used to maintain the affordability of publicly assisted housing, ensuring that these units are available to lower-income households in the long term. Over time, the City may face the risk of losing some of its affordable units due to the expiration of covenants and deed restrictions.

If market rents continue to increase, property owners may be inclined to discontinue public subsidies and convert the assisted units to market-rate housing.

Risk was assessed based on information from the California Housing Partnership Corporation (CHPC), HUD, the California Low Income Tax Credit Committee staff, and information provided by the property managers of some properties. CHPC data indicates the federally assisted 35-unit Deer Creek Apartments is potentially at risk of conversion to market-rate housing when affordability controls expire in 2023. This project is considered at risk, which indicates that a property may convert to market rate within five years. Moderate risk is assigned to projects expected to expire within ten years of the start of the planning period (June 30, 2022). Low risk indicates that a property cannot convert to market rate for at least ten years. Although projects with agreements expiring within ten years of the beginning of the planning period are required by law to be listed, these units may not actually convert.

The Deer Creek Apartments’ affordability status may expire in 2023 according to HCD’s 6th cycle data for the Siskiyou County region. Deer Creek Apartments is a 31 unit housing development of which 29 of the units are HUD-funded project based rental assistance units. Project-based assistance is tied to particular units, and does not travel with individual tenants. This means that project-based rental assistance can be a source of long-term affordability if preserved. Therefore, advocacy to preserve units with project-based rental assistance is crucial. (https://www.nhlp.org/resource-center/project-based-rental-assistance/, National Housing Law Project, accessed July 10, 2022). The City is actively attempting to contact the property owners and management company to obtain information about their plans for the 29 assisted housing units, i.e., are they contemplating converting the units to market rate units. Property owners of federally assisted projects are required to provide notices of intent if rent subsidies will be terminated to all affected households and public agencies at six and twelve months prior to termination, unless exempted. The regulations stipulate that the City and HCD are affected agencies. Owners of government-assisted developments cannot terminate subsidy contracts, such as project-based rental assistance, without first providing an exclusive "notice of opportunity to submit an offer to 207
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-75 January 31, 2023
purchase" to non-profit housing entities that have registered with the State. Program HE-4.2.1 commits the City to facilitating the processes to retain these 29 units as assisted units Currently the City does not know the plans of Richfield Development for the property. The following is an analysis of the preservation and replacement options of the Deer Creek Apartments affordable housing project if the current owners do not maintain the property’s affordability status and elect to convert the units market rate units.

4.3.4. PRESERVATION AND REPLACEMENT OPTIONS
A. Overview
To maintain the existing affordable housing stock, the City can work to preserve the existing assisted units or facilitate the development of new units. Depending on the circumstances of at-risk projects, different options may be used to preserve or replace the units. Preservation options typically include (1) transfer of project to nonprofit ownership; (2) provision of rental assistance to tenants using non-federal funding sources; and (3) purchase of affordability covenants. In terms of replacement, the most direct option is the development of new assisted multifamily housing units. These options are described below.

B. Transfer of Ownership
Transferring ownership of an at-risk project to a nonprofit housing provider is generally one of the least costly ways to ensure that at-risk units remain affordable for the long term. By transferring property ownership to a nonprofit organization, low-income restrictions can be secured indefinitely and the project would become potentially eligible for a greater range of governmental assistance. The Deer Creek Apartments complex is currently owned by a development corporation and managed by a private firm out of Sacramento. As such it may benefit from being acquired by a nonprofit agency that will maintain the affordability of the units.

The current market value of the project was estimated using information from multifamily sales listings in Yreka and surrounding areas. The average cost to purchase a multifamily development was $168 per square foot. There are 35 units of approximately 750 square feet each at the Deer Creek Apartments at risk of converting to market rate within ten years. If these were purchased, the estimated cost of acquiring these would be $4,410,000.

C. Rental Assistance
Rental subsidies using non-federal (state, local, or other) funding sources can be used to maintain affordability of the 35 at-risk affordable units. These rent subsidies can be structured to mirror the federal Section 8 program.

Under Section 8, HUD pays the difference between what tenants can pay (defined as 30 percent of household income) and what HUD estimates as the fair market rent (FMR) on the unit. In Siskiyou County, the 2022 fair market rent is determined to be $701 for a one-bedroom unit, $922 for a two-bedroom unit, and $1,310 for a three-bedroom unit.

The feasibility of this alternative is highly dependent on the availability of other funding sources necessary to make rent subsidies available and the willingness of property owners to accept rental vouchers if they can be provided. As indicated in Table A-58, the total cost of subsidizing the rents for all 35 at-risk units is estimated at $4,130 per month or $49,560 annually.

Table A-58
Estimated Rental Subsidies Required
Unit Size Total Units Fair
Market
Rent1
House-hold
Size
Very Low
Income (50%
MFI)
2 AffordableCost
– Utilities3
Monthly
per Unit
Subsidy
Total
Monthly
Subsidy
208
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-76 January 31, 2023
1 br 35 $701 1 $27,300 $583 $118 $4,130
Total 35 $4,130
Source: HUD 2022 1
Fair Market Rent is determined by HUD for different jurisdictions/areas across the United States on an annual basis. 2 2022 Median Family Income (MFI) limits based on 2022 Income Limits from HUD. In Siskiyou County, the median family income in 2022 was calculated to be $62,700. The income limit for a very low-income household was $27,300 for a one-person household, $31,200 for a two-person household, and $35,100 for a three-person household. 3 Affordable cost = 30 percent of household monthly income minus estimated utility allowance of $100 for a one-bedroom unit, $150 for a two-bedroom unit, and $200 for a three-bedroom unit.

D. Purchase of Affordability Covenants
Another option to preserve the affordability of at-risk projects is to provide an incentive package to the owners to maintain the projects as affordable housing. Incentives could include supplementing the Section 8 subsidy received to market levels. The feasibility of this option depends on whether the complex is too highly leveraged.

By providing lump sum financial incentives the City can ensure that some or all of the units remain affordable.

At current market conditions, a typical one bedroom apartment in Yreka costs approximately $800 per month plus utilities. This is $99 more than the fair market value as determined by HUD. In order to further supplement Section 8 subsidies it would cost an additional $3,465 a month for all 35 units.

E. Construction of Replacement Units
The construction of new affordable housing units is a means of replacing the at-risk units should they be converted to market-rate units. The cost of developing housing depends on a variety of factors, including density, size of the units (i.e., square footage and number of bedrooms), location, land costs, and type of construction.

Assuming an average construction cost of $520,000 per unit1 , it would cost over $18.2 million to construct 35 new
assisted units. Including land costs, the total costs to develop replacement units will be significantly higher.

F. Cost Comparisons
The above analysis attempts to estimate the cost of preserving the at-risk units under various options. The cost of acquiring the Deer Creek Apartments project and transferring ownership to another nonprofit organization is high ($4.4 million). In comparison, the annual costs of providing rental subsidies required to preserve the 56 assisted units are relatively low ($49,560). However, long-term affordability of the units cannot be ensured in this manner. The option of constructing 35 replacement units is very high ($18.2 million, excluding land costs) and constrained by a variety of factors, including land costs and potential community opposition. The best option to preserve the at-risk units appears to be the purchase of affordability covenants.

4.3.5. RESOURCES FOR PRESERVING ASSISTED RENTAL HOUSING A. Organizations
The preservation of affordable rental housing at risk of conversion to market-rate housing can be assisted by nonprofit organizations with the capacity and interest in acquiring, managing, and permanently preserving such housing. HCD maintains a list of individuals and organizations that above meets the eligibility criteria as a qualified entity to participate in the Opportunity to Submit an Offer To Purchase federally-assisted multifamily rental housing projects and Right-of-First Refusal, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65863.11.

Eskaton Properties Inc. of Carmichael, California, is the sole organization found on HCD’s Qualified Entities list dated December 17, 2021. The pool of qualified entities is potentially greater that represented on HCD’s list: the 1 Cost per unit is based on the estimated cost of the Crossroads project currently underway in Yreka. This development will consist of 50 units and is estimated to cost $26 million to construct. 209
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-77 January 31, 2023
Shasta County and Karuk Tribe housing authorities both operate in the City, and the non-profit housing developer Rural Communities Housing Development Corporation of Ukiah, California recently secured permits for Siskiyou Crossroads.

B. Rehabilitation Program
The City’s rehabilitation loan program is currently funded by a revolving loan account (RLA). The City applied for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds in the past that were used to give rehabilitation loans. As repayments of these loans are received, the money is put back into a loan account for new applicants. Loans are made to households in target income groups (TIGs) and can be used for structural rehabilitation, room additions to relieve overcrowding, and total reconstructions. Interest rates for owner-occupied units are usually set at 3 percent but can be as low as 0 percent for very low-income households, and the life of the loan can be up to 30 years. Seven households were assisted between 2008 and 2012. The revolving fund is still in existence. The City has interest in using the funds to provide accessible housing for those with disabilities.

C. Housing Authority
The State of California does not own or operate public housing; public housing is administered directly through local public housing authorities. However, for those jurisdictions that do not have a local public housing authority, HCD has a Housing Assistance Program that administers the Section 8 program in those counties.

The Shasta County Housing Authority administers the Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) program for Siskiyou County and its jurisdictions. The program provides a voucher to recipients to use to help pay their rent for any rental unit that accepts the voucher. The recipients pay part of the rent based on 30 percent of their income, and the Section 8 program pays the remaining amount. Shasta County administers a total of 195 vouchers throughout Siskiyou County and 61 in Yreka. An additional 126 applicants are on the City of Yreka Housing Choice Voucher waiting list.

The Karuk Tribe, which owns land in Yreka, operates its own housing authority. The Karuk Tribe Housing Authority (KTHA) owns and operates single-family and multifamily housing that is available to low- and moderate-income Native Americans. Further, the KTHA administers 15 housing vouchers, which KTHA makes available to the elderly and disabled.

4.3.6. CITY OF YREKA 6TH CYCLE RHNA AND HOUSING ELEMENT INVENTORY FUTURE

HOUSING NEEDS
Pursuant to the California Government Code Section 65584, HCD has developed a Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) Plan for the Siskiyou county region. The RHNA Plan identifies a need for 20 new residential units in Siskiyou county region over an eight-year period (February 2023 to November 2030). The regional housing need for 20 units is evenly shared and distributed among the County and each of the nine cities. Each jurisdiction being allocated two housing units. As part of the RHNA Plan, HCD designates the affordability targets for the housing units. For the two housing units, the RHNA Plan identifies affordability targets of one low-income unit and one very-low income unit for each jurisdiction in the Siskiyou region. Thus, the City of Yreka’s share of regional housing needs is 2 units over the eight-year period with one unit affordable to very-low income households and the other unit designated as affordable to low income households. As discussed above in Section 3.2.2(A), as required by statute, at least 50 percent of a jurisdiction’s very low income RHNA must be categorized as ELI. In addition to the one low income unit and one very low income unit, City assigns itself one (1) ELI unit, resulting in a total of three (3) units for its 6th cycle RHNA. The City’s RHNA is presented in Table A59. 210
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-78 January 31, 2023
The City and the community recognize that the City’s RHNA values underestimate the actual local housing need.

Yreka is not immune from the housing crisis facing most communities in California and too confronted with price and rent increases exceeding the buying power of local wages, increasing construction costs, the pace of home construction not keeping up with pace population growth, etc.

As shown in Appendix C, the City’s inventory of vacant property zoned to allow by-right multifamily is sufficient to meet the City’s 2023-2031 RHNA of one very low income housing unit and one low income housing unit, making it is unnecessary for the City to undertake a rezoning program in order to have adequate sites for new housing development. Nonetheless, in recognition that the community housing need is greater than the City’s RHNA obligation, a critical objective of the Housing Element’s Goals, Policies and Programs City is to increase the variety and affordability of housing during the Element’s eight year planning period. The sites identified in Appendix C can support the development of housing in excess of the City’s share of the 2022-2030 regional housing needs as estimated and allocated by HCD. Therefore, it can be conclusively stated that the City has adequate inventory of sites to its with supporting public services and facilities, to accommodate its housing needs over the current planning period.

Table A-59
Regional Housing Needs Allocation City of Yreka RHNA 2022–2030 IncomeCategory
Projected
HousingNeeds
Percentage of
Total
ExtremelyLow* 1 33 %
Very Low 1 33%
Low 1 33%
Moderate 0 0%
AboveModerate 0 0%
Total 3 100%
Source: Siskiyou County 6th Cycle Housing Element Data Packet, December 21, 2021; Siskiyou County Final RHNA, HCD, December 2021

4.3.7. ANNEXATIONS
According to the March 2021 Yreka Municipal Service Review, there are no active annexations within the City’s sphere of influence. Further, because the projected population growth rate is relatively low and there is an adequate supply of vacant property zoned for residential development, most new growth is expected to occur in the existing city limits (Yreka Municipal Service Review, April 2021, Siskiyou LAFCo, pg. 2-3). Additionally, the 2021 Yreka Municipal Service Review reports the most recent annexations occurred in 2009 and 2010 when 2.89 acres were annexed into the City, and a 0.52-acre strip of land was detached from the City to the Karuk Tribe.

Yreka is considering annexation of the City owned parcels on Phillipe Lane immediately south of the City boundaries. This annexation would require modification of the Sphere of Influence boundary.

4.3.8. HOUSING NEEDS AND VACANT LANDS
Table A-60 summarizes the available vacant land in the City that is appropriate to meet housing needs identified by community that is beyond the City’s 6th cycle RHNA obligation, including sites that can support the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels. As noted in Table A-46, there are a total of 82 acres of R-3 (R-3-12 and R-3-16) zoned land with the potential to result in 1,005 units; 138 acres of R-2 zoned land with the potential to result in 1,794 units; 1,177 acres of R-1 zoned land with the potential to result in 354 units; 46 211
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-79 January 31, 2023
R-A zoned parcels comprising 649 acres with the potential to result in 92 units; and 9.6 acres of RPO zoned land with the potential to result in 125 units.

Some of the sites listed in Table A-60 identify constraints to development. Some constraints are associated with 100-year floodplains, hillside topography, access, special-status species, and/or parcel sizes that are too small to develop without boundary line adjustments or mergers with adjacent parcels. Constraints affecting density yield are reflected in the projected realistic capacity identified in Table A-60.

Based on recent development activity in the city, a net density of 90 percent of the maximum density was assumed for most of the multifamily zoned parcels, and a net density of 50–80 percent (average 65 percent) of the maximum density was assumed for most of the single-family zoned parcels. Examples of recent multifamily projects that were developed or approved include the Siskiyou Crossroads – No Place Like Home Development.

This 50-unit project is being built on 4 acres for a maximum density of 12.5 dwelling units per acre and a 100 percent buildout. There are very few large single-family residential subdivisions in Yreka with which to estimate buildout densities. The most recent single-family residential subdivision that was approved in Yreka is the Liberty Hills Subdivision. This subdivision, which is situated on slopes of 12–22 percent, was approved for 16 units on 5.07 acres (including roads), for a maximum density of 3.2 dwelling units per acre and a 53 percent buildout.

In those cases where steeper slopes and/or other constraints exist, the realistic capacity of the parcels has been reduced accordingly. For example, the vacant RA zoned lands located north and east of Interstate 5 and State Route 3 are severely limited by steep slopes and Yreka phlox, a rare and endangered plant. It is estimated that this area and a small portion of RA land on steep slopes in southwest Yreka account for roughly 450 acres of the 663 acres zoned RA. Density on this acreage has typically been estimated to not exceed 0.20 units per acre (1 unit/5 acres). Similarly, the largest block of R-1 zoned land on the east side of Interstate 5 and adjacent to the easterly city limits is estimated to contain 350 acres and is very steep (30 percent slopes and greater). Further, an estimated 300 acres scattered along the westerly city boundary also contain steep slopes, typically in excess of 20 percent. Density yield on this acreage is not expected to exceed .20 units per acre. All remaining lands zoned for single- or multifamily development are located on lands with slopes typically ranging from 0 to 15 percent.

The density yields on these lands will not be significantly affected by topography.

Affordable housing is permitted in a variety of residential zone districts. However, most affordable projects will occur in the R-3 zone since it permits higher densities and fits projects that are supported by government assistance. As noted above, there are a total of 83 acres of R-3 (R-3-12 and R-3-16) zoned lands with the potential to result in 1,024 units.

Public sewer and water service is readily available within 100 feet of most of the vacant lands identified in Table A-60. Water supply and sewage treatment capacity is more than adequate to serve the projected growth for the next five years and well beyond. The City’s 2022 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) reports an estimated population of 7,593 with a projected demand of 2,019 acre-feet per year by 2030. This is less than the actual reported use of 2,187 acre-feet in 2020. The projected 2030 demand results in a surplus of 5,781 acre-feet which indicates that the City will continue to have surplus water supply that may be used to support additional housing units. These assumptions do not include non-residential growth. In other words, even with considerably more aggressive growth assumptions than are present in the RHNA, Yreka is only expected to use 35 percent and 24 percent of available water during a normal year and single dry year, respectively. The UWMP also notes that the City’s wastewater treatment facility has the capacity to treat 1.3 million gallons per day, or 1,487 AF per year. In 2020 837 acre-feet of wastewater was processed which is approximately 56 percent of the City’s total capacity.

Based on the 2022 UWMP population projections for 2030, the City is anticipated to treat less wastewater than in 2020. This also indicates there is enough treatment capacity to support additional housing units. 212
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-80 January 31, 2023

4.3.9. 6TH CYCLE RHNA
While the supply of vacant and appropriately zoned property is adequate to meet the City’s 2022-2030 RHNA, the Housing Element includes programs to increase the supply of land suitable for multifamily development, remove regulatory barriers to improve opportunities to diversify the City’s housing stock with respect to affordability and housing types. Appendix C and Table A-54 identify sites that support a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including multifamily rental housing, factory-built housing, mobilehomes, housing for agricultural employees, supportive housing, single-room occupancy units, emergency shelters, and transitional housing.

4.4. FUNDING SOURCES
Many types of funding are available to the City and local nonprofit housing organizations to ensure the availability of housing affordable to low- and moderate-income persons. Appendix D lists the grant and loan options the City or other agencies can apply to fund services for residents of Yreka. There are programs to help fund the development of multifamily rental housing, supportive housing, homeless shelters and transitional housing, firsttime homebuyer, and rehabilitation programs, second mortgages, and self-help housing. The state and federal funding programs are usually highly competitive and oversubscribed. Many of these funding programs require shovel ready projects, meaning housing projects are only eligible if all needed entitlements are in place. The application period for jurisdictions and organizations to apply for these funding programs is typically short, less than six months. The combination of these factors heightens the need for the City to consider:
• Development of local and regional funding sources, e.g., a regional housing trust fund, in collaboration with Siskiyou County, the other cities, and public housing authorities. • Also, the need for the City to remove regulatory and procedural barriers that increase the availability of sites suitable for siting affordable housing in a variety of configurations.

4.5. OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENERGY CONSERVATION
Opportunities for energy conservation can be found for both existing and future housing developments.

Conservation can be achieved through a variety of approaches, including reducing the use of energy- consuming appliances and features in a home, physical modification of existing structures or land uses, and reducing the reliance on automobiles by encouraging more mixed-use and infill development and providing pedestrian access to commercial and recreational facilities.

Some energy conservation features are incorporated into the design of residential structures in Yreka due to the requirements of Title 24, which outlines measures to reduce energy consumption. These measures include lowflow plumbing fixtures, efficient heating and cooling opportunities, dual-pane windows, and adequate insulation and weatherstripping. Incorporating new technology in residential developments offers developers a chance to design projects that allow for maximum energy conservation opportunities. Although energy regulations establish a uniform standard of energy efficiency, they do not ensure that all available conservation features are incorporated into building design. Additional measures may further reduce heating, cooling, and lighting loads and overall energy consumption. While it is not feasible that all possible conservation features be included in every development, there are often a number of economically feasible measures that may result in savings in excess of the minimum required by Title 24.

Constructing new homes with energy-conserving features, in addition to retrofitting existing structures, will result in a reduction in monthly utility costs. There are many ways to determine how energy efficient an existing building is and, if needed, what improvements can be made. Many modern building design methods are used to 213
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-81 January 31, 2023
reduce residential energy consumption and are based on proven techniques. These methods can be categorized in three ways:

1. Building design that keeps natural heat in during the winter and keeps natural heat out during the summer.

Such design reduces air conditioning and heating demands. Proven building techniques in this category include:
• Location of windows and openings in relation to the path of the sun to minimize solar gain in the summer and maximize solar gain in the winter.
• Use of “thermal mass,” earthen materials such as stone, brick, concrete, and tiles that absorb heat during the day and release heat at night.
• Use of window coverings, insulation, and other materials to reduce heat exchange between the interior of a home and the exterior.
• Location of openings and the use of ventilating devices that take advantage of natural air flow. • Use of eaves and overhangs that block direct solar gain through window openings during the summer but allow solar gain during the winter.
• Zone heating and cooling systems, which reduce heating and cooling in the unused areas of a home.

2. Building orientation that uses natural forces to maintain a comfortable interior temperature. Examples include:
• North-south orientation of the long axis of a dwelling. • Minimizing the southern and western exposure of exterior surfaces. • Location of dwellings to take advantage of natural air circulation and evening breezes.

3. Use of landscaping features to moderate interior temperatures. Such techniques include:
• Use of deciduous shade trees and other plants to protect the home. • Use of natural or artificial flowing water.
• Use of trees and hedges as windbreaks.

In addition to these naturally based techniques, modern methods include:
• Use of solar energy to heat water.
• Use of radiant barriers on roofs to keep attics cool. • Use of solar panels and other devices to generate electricity. • High efficiency coating on windows to repel summer heat and trap winter warmth. • Weather stripping and other insulation to reduce heat gain and loss. • Use of natural gas for dryers, stovetops, and ranges. • Use of energy-efficient home appliances.
• Use of low-flow showerheads and faucet aerators to reduce hot water use.

Major opportunities for residential energy conservation in the city will include insulation and weatherproofing, landscaping, and maximizing orientation, lowering appliance consumption, and maximizing solar energy. 214
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-82 January 31, 2023
The State of California offers numerous programs to assist residents with energy efficiency upgrades and renewable energy resources. Many of the programs include special financing and extended subsidies for affordable housing. Siskiyou County residents are eligible for several of these programs, including the California Solar Initiative, New Solar Homes Partnership, and Energy Upgrade California.

The following policies and programs relate to the City’s opportunities for energy conservation:
• Policy HE-2.3 Promote the use of energy conservation measures in all housing, including very low-, low, and moderate-income housing.
• Program HE-2.3.1.2: Promote the use of energy conservation measures in all housing through the use of public and private weatherization programs. Provide information on currently available weatherization and energy conservation programs to residents of the city. The City will have information available for the public at the front counter of City Hall and will distribute information through an annual mailing. • Program HE-2.3.1.3: Continue to enforce state requirements, including Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, for energy conservation in new residential projects and encourage residential developers to employ additional energy conservation measures for the siting of buildings, landscaping, and solar access through development standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance, Building Code, and Specific Plans as appropriate.
215
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-83 January 31, 2023
Table A-60
By-Right Sites Available for Residential Development
APN
Structure
Value Zoning Residential Allowed?
Site
Constraint Acreage
Allowable
Density Water Connection Sewer Connection FireHazard
053-611-490 0 R-1 By-Right 0.005 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-203-130 0 RPO By-Right Floodplain 0.008 1-10 du/acc Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-061-030 0 R-1 By-Right 0.011 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. in parcel frontage 053-151-080 0 R-1 By-Right 0.012 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-111-280 0 R-1 By-Right 0.013 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-121-040 0 R-1 By-Right 0.018 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-131-270 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 0.018 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 062-151-390 0 R-1 By-Right 0.02 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-581-280 0 R-1 By-Right 0.022 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-181-030 0 RA By-Right 0.024 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-151-020 0 R-1 By-Right 0.025 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 053-162-100 0 R-1 By-Right 0.026 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-201-130 0 R-1 By-Right 0.027 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-043-100 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 0.03 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-151-070 0 R-1 By-Right 0.03 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-311-210 0 R-1 By-Right 0.03 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 053-541-450 0 R-1 By-Right 0.03 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 053-341-370 0 R-3-12 By-Right 0.037 1-12 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-131-350 0 R-1 By-Right 0.039 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-191-290 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 0.04 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-131-120 0 R-1 By-Right 0.04 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 054-162-060 0 R-1 By-Right 0.04 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 054-123-040 0 R-1 By-Right 0.045 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-341-300 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 0.047 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-101-130 0 R-1 By-Right 0.05 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-081-110 0 R-1 By-Right 0.051 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. in parcel frontage 053-341-310 0 R-3-12 By-Right 0.052 1-12 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 216
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-84 January 31, 2023
APN Structure
Value Zoning Residential Allowed?
Site
Constraint Acreage Allowable Density Water Connection Sewer Connection FireHazard 053-581-270 0 R-1 By-Right 0.058 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-662-420 0 R-1 By-Right 0.058 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-131-130 0 R-1 By-Right 0.059 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 053-331-190 0 R-3-12 By-Right 0.059 1-12 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 062-151-250 0 R-1 By-Right 0.06 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-581-250 0 R-1 By-Right 0.061 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-532-290 0 R-1 By-Right 0.065 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-202-080 0 RPO By-Right Floodplain 0.069 1-15 du/acc Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-123-230 0 R-2 By-Right 0.073 1-13 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft 053-233-090 0 R-1 By-Right 0.078 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-131-230 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 0.078 no info. no info. 053-392-060 0 R-1 By-Right 0.079 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-324-030 0 RPO By-Right 0.088 1-10 du/acc Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-291-350 0 RPO By-Right 0.09 1-10 du/acc Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-281-020 0 RPO By-Right 0.092 1-15 du/acc Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-081-060 0 R-2 By-Right 0.094 1-13 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-202-110 0 RPO By-Right Floodplain 0.094 1-10 du/acc Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-173-510 0 R-3-12 By-Right 0.095 1-12 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 053-301-330 0 R-1 By-Right 0.099 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 053-532-260 0 R-1 By-Right 0.1 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 053-662-100 0 R-1 By-Right 0.1 1-6 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. outside 300ft 054-163-090 0 R-1 By-Right 0.1 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-631-050 0 RA By-Right 0.1 1 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-042-080 0 R-1 By-Right 0.101 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-481-010 0 R-1 By-Right 0.105 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-532-220 0 R-1 By-Right 0.106 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-191-320 0 R-3-12 By-Right 0.113 1-12 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-662-670 0 R-1 By-Right 0.117 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 054-131-250 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 0.118 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 217
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-85 January 31, 2023
APN Structure
Value Zoning Residential Allowed?
Site
Constraint Acreage Allowable Density Water Connection Sewer Connection FireHazard 053-072-130 0 R-3-12 By-Right Floodplain 0.129 1-12 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-091-220 0 R-1 By-Right 0.13 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. in parcel frontage 054-092-020 0 R-1 By-Right 0.134 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft 054-092-200 5500 R-1 By-Right 0.137 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-092-290 0 R-1 By-Right 0.139 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft 054-092-300 0 R-1 By-Right 0.14 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. within 100ft 053-161-130 0 R-1 By-Right 0.142 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-272-190 0 RPO By-Right 0.146 1-10 du/acc Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-321-090 0 R-1 By-Right 0.147 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-511-240 0 R-1 By-Right 0.148 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. in parcel frontage 061-272-110 0 RPO By-Right 0.166 1-10 du/acc Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-261-030 0 R-1 By-Right 0.167 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-271-400 0 R-1 By-Right 0.174 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 061-011-240 0 R-1 By-Right 0.176 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-221-020 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 0.182 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-152-150 0 R-1 By-Right 0.19 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-511-290 0 R-1 By-Right 0.19 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-151-540 0 R-1 By-Right 0.19 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-151-530 0 R-1 By-Right 0.19 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-021-240 0 R-3-16 By-Right 0.19 1-16 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-191-030 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 0.193 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-132-010 0 R-1 By-Right 0.199 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-181-240 0 R-1 By-Right Size 0.2 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 062-122-400 0 R-1 By-Right 0.21 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-122-390 0 R-1 By-Right 0.21 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-211-060 0 R-1 By-Right 0.212 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 054-092-270 0 R-1 By-Right 0.216 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft 053-501-360 0 R-1 By-Right 0.22 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-651-700 0 R-3-12 By-Right Size 0.23 1-12 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 218
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-86 January 31, 2023
APN Structure
Value Zoning Residential Allowed?
Site
Constraint Acreage Allowable Density Water Connection Sewer Connection FireHazard 053-481-570 0 R-1 By-Right 0.235 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-231-280 0 RPO By-Right Floodplain 0.238 1-10 du/acc Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-191-300 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 0.24 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-181-040 0 RA By-Right 0.242 no info. no info.
053-191-360 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 0.26 1-6 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. within 100ft 062-151-550 0 R-1 By-Right 0.26 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-122-320 0 R-1 By-Right 0.26 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-091-070 0 R-1 By-Right 0.265 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-021-260 0 R-3-16 By-Right 0.27 1-16 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 054-092-370 0 R-1 By-Right 0.276 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 053-750-240 0 R-1 By-Right 0.29 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 062-122-430 0 R-1 By-Right 0.298 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-191-280 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 0.3 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-511-030 0 R-1 By-Right 0.3 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 200ft to 300ft 053-541-190 0 R-1 By-Right 0.3 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-181-300 0 R-1 By-Right 0.3 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 062-122-140 0 R-1 By-Right 0.3 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-122-080 0 R-1 By-Right 0.3 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-141-050 0 R-1 By-Right 0.3 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. in parcel frontage 061-051-100 0 R-1 By-Right 0.309 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. in parcel frontage 062-201-160 0 R-1 By-Right 0.31 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 054-162-050 0 R-1 By-Right 0.31 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft 053-152-170 0 R-1 By-Right 0.32 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-750-270 0 R-1 By-Right 0.32 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-672-450 0 RA By-Right Size 0.325 1 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-521-200 0 R-1 By-Right 0.33 1-6 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. in parcel frontage 062-211-050 0 R-2 By-Right 0.332 1-13 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-750-250 0 R-1 By-Right 0.34 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-750-320 0 R-1 By-Right 0.34 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 219
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-87 January 31, 2023
APN Structure
Value Zoning Residential Allowed?
Site
Constraint Acreage Allowable Density Water Connection Sewer Connection FireHazard 053-521-180 0 R-1 By-Right 0.35 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-521-270 0 R-1 By-Right 0.35 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-151-090 0 R-1 By-Right 0.36 no info. no info.
062-122-670 0 R-1 By-Right 0.36 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-311-250 0 R-3-12 By-Right 0.38 1-12 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-311-270 0 RPO By-Right 0.389 1-10 du/acc Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-491-190 0 R-1 By-Right 0.4 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. in parcel frontage 061-011-330 0 R-1 By-Right 0.4 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-211-070 0 R-2 By-Right 0.4 1-13 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-131-260 0 R-1 By-Right 0.45 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. outside 300ft 054-092-380 0 R-1 By-Right 0.472 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 061-131-180 0 R-1 By-Right 0.49 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-131-190 0 R-1 By-Right 0.49 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 200ft to 300ft Avail. within 200ft to 300ft 061-141-150 0 R-1 By-Right 0.5 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-201-080 0 R-1 By-Right 0.5 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-631-060 0 RA By-Right 0.5 1 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. outside 300ft 053-642-260 0 RA By-Right 0.5 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-672-300 0 RA By-Right 0.5 1 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 062-202-010 0 R-1 By-Right 0.502 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-043-090 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 0.513 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 062-122-040 0 R-1 By-Right 0.52 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 200ft to 300ft Avail. within 200ft to 300ft 061-131-250 0 R-1 By-Right 0.52 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-750-170 0 R-1 By-Right 0.53 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-750-550 0 R-1 By-Right 0.54 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-370-100 0 R-1 By-Right 0.55 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-011-140 0 R-1 By-Right 0.57 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-501-020 0 R-1 By-Right 0.6 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 061-271-030 0 R-2 By-Right 0.629 1-13 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-541-360 0 R-1 By-Right 0.7 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 220
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-88 January 31, 2023
APN Structure
Value Zoning Residential Allowed?
Site
Constraint Acreage Allowable Density Water Connection Sewer Connection FireHazard 062-151-230 0 R-1 By-Right 0.7 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 053-642-330 0 R-1 By-Right 0.7 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-131-170 0 R-1 By-Right 0.71 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-131-230 0 R-1 By-Right 0.73 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 061-221-280 0 R-1 By-Right 0.74 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-672-210 0 RA By-Right Size 0.746 1 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. outside 300ft 061-111-090 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 0.76 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-071-100 0 R-1 By-Right 0.84 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-361-140 0 R-1 By-Right 0.9 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-131-160 0 R-1 By-Right 0.92 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-091-200 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 0.95 1-6 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. in parcel frontage 062-061-210 0 R-1 By-Right 0.96 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 062-181-270 0 R-1 By-Right 1 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-091-130 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 1 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-591-090 0 RA By-Right Slope/phlox 1 1 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-721-090 0 RA By-Right 1 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-631-080 0 RA By-Right 1.01 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-721-020 0 RA By-Right 1.01 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-152-160 0 R-1 By-Right 1.05 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-091-190 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 1.09 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. in parcel frontage 062-181-210 0 RA By-Right 1.1 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-361-180 0 R-1 By-Right 1.3 1-6 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. within 200ft to 300ft 053-642-230 0 R-3-16 By-Right 1.3 1-16 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. within 100ft 061-131-240 0 R-1 By-Right 1.34 1-6 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. outside 300ft 062-181-330 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 1.4 no info. no info. 053-561-230 0 R-1 By-Right 1.45 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 061-201-100 0 R-1 By-Right 1.66 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-131-010 0 R-1 By-Right 2 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-361-130 0 R-1 By-Right 2.1 1-6 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. within 100ft 221
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-89 January 31, 2023
APN Structure
Value Zoning Residential Allowed?
Site
Constraint Acreage Allowable Density Water Connection Sewer Connection FireHazard 062-181-350 0 RA By-Right 2.23 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 062-122-120 0 R-1 By-Right 2.31 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 200ft to 300ft Avail. within 200ft to 300ft 062-181-060 0 RA By-Right 2.6 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-121-040 0 R-1 By-Right 2.7 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-642-090 0 RA By-Right Slope 3 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-672-410 0 RA By-Right 3 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. in parcel frontage 062-122-130 0 R-1 By-Right 3.3 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. in parcel frontage 053-591-340 0 RA By-Right 3.3 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-591-420 0 R-1 By-Right 3.9 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-221-310 0 R-3-12 By-Right 3.95 1-12 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-672-670 0 RA By-Right 4 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-672-030 0 RA By-Right 5.02 1 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. outside 300ft 053-672-400 0 RA By-Right 5.14 1 du/ac Avail. within 200ft to 300ft Avail. in parcel frontage 053-642-600 0 R-3-16 By-Right 5.53 1-16 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. in parcel frontage 053-642-050 0 RA By-Right 5.728 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 062-181-340 0 RA By-Right 6.37 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-361-090 0 R-1 By-Right 6.6 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. in parcel frontage 053-672-320 0 RA By-Right 8.6 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-642-080 0 RA By-Right 8.7 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 200ft to 300ft 053-591-320 0 RA By-Right 9 1 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-091-160 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 10.04 1-6 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 053-711-030 0 R-3-12 By-Right 10.5 1-12 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. in parcel frontage 053-591-440 0 R-1 By-Right 10.6 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-370-170 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 10.73 1-6 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. in parcel frontage 053-591-360 0 RA By-Right 11 1 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-591-530 0 RA By-Right 12.1 1 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-201-070 0 R-1 By-Right Slope 13 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-591-370 0 RA By-Right 13.3 1 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-651-820 0 R-3-12 By-Right 13.9 1-12 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 222
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-90 January 31, 2023
APN Structure
Value Zoning Residential Allowed?
Site
Constraint Acreage Allowable Density Water Connection Sewer Connection FireHazard 061-141-030 0 R-1 By-Right 14.2 1-6 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. within 100ft 061-361-200 0 R-1 By-Right 14.4 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft 061-121-060 0 R-1 By-Right 14.45 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-672-370 0 RA By-Right 14.48 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-591-300 0 RA By-Right 15.5 1 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-591-310 0 RA By-Right 18.1 1 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-591-160 0 RA By-Right 19.3 1 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-211-010 0 R-1 By-Right 19.6 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-201-050 0 R-1 By-Right Slope 20 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-672-330 0 RA By-Right 20.4 1 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. within 100ft 053-672-310 0 RA By-Right 29 1 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. within 200ft to 300ft 053-642-440 0 R-1 By-Right Slope 35.2 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 200ft to 300ft 061-301-010 0 R-1 By-Right Slope/Tower 37 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-672-260 0 RA By-Right 39.2 1 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. outside 300ft 053-591-560 0 R-3-12 By-Right 44.8 1-12 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-201-010 0 R-1 By-Right Slope 45.6 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 061-301-130 0 R-1 By-Right Slope 69.2 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 062-211-080 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 81.88 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft to 200ft Avail. within 100ft to 200ft 053-770-010 0 R-1 By-Right Floodplain 89 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 062-211-020 0 RA By-Right 93.3 1 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-651-810 0 R-1 By-Right Slope 108.61 1-6 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. within 100ft 053-711-100 0 R-1 By-Right Slope 115 1-6 du/ac Avail. in parcel frontage Avail. in parcel frontage 053-651-740 0 R-1 By-Right Slope 134.76 1-6 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. within 100ft 053-770-020 0 R-2 By-Right 136.9 1-13 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-631-070 0 RA By-Right 140.39 1 du/ac Avail. within 100ft Avail. outside 300ft 053-770-030 0 R-1 By-Right 141 1-6 du/ac Avail. outside 300ft Avail. outside 300ft 223
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-91 January 31, 2023
Figure 4: Map of Yreka's Sites available for By-Right Residential Development 224
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft A-92 January 31, 2023
1 Cost To Build 2022. Home Construction Cost for 1,500 sq ft single family home with 2-car garage. Access March 16, 2022, from https://www.costtobuild.net/estimator.html.
2 Census-American Community Survey definitions (accessed June 10, 2022 from https://www2.census.gov/programssurveys/acs/tech_docs/subject_definitions/2020_ACSSubjectDefinitions.pdf Household, family, Size of
The term "size of household" includes all the people occupying a housing unit. "Size of family" includes the family householder and all other people in the living quarters who are related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption.

Household, nonfamily
A nonfamily household consists of a householder living alone (a one-person household) or where the householder shares the home exclusively with people to whom he/she is not related. 3 The total Yreka population of 7,559 listed in Table A-16 differs from the value of 7,807 listed in Table A-1 of 7,807 relates to the methodology used to estimate this subpopulations. 4 Parcels zoned R-3-12, the maximum allowable density is 12 dwelling units per acre. 5 Willson, Richard. (2013). Parking Reform Made Easy. Island Press. 225
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
Draft January 2023

APPENDIX B

ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING
226
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 1 January 2023
Appendix B - ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING
Public agencies, which includes all cities and counties, have the duty to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH) as part of the agency’s activities and programs relating to housing and community pursuant to Government Code Section 8899.50 et seq. This is an ongoing and continual obligation. Enactment of Assembly Bill 686 (2017) takes the AFFH duty further by requiring all housing elements due to be revised on or after January 1, 2021, contain an assessment of fair housing practices, an analysis of the relationship between available sites and areas of high or low resources, and concrete actions in the form of programs to affirmatively further fair housing. A housing element must contain AFFH components for:

Public Outreach: A diligent effort in the public participation process to include all community stakeholders, including individuals and organizations in the city and the region who represent lower income households, people in protected classes, and households with special needs.

Conduct an Assessment of Fair Housing: The housing needs assessment is to include an analysis of fair housing issues, existing patterns and trends of segregation and inclusion, and current fair housing issues. In the context of AFFH, segregation means there is a high concentration of persons of a particular race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, or having a disability or a type of disability in a particular geographic area when compared to a broader geographic area.

The Housing Element Land Inventory: The City’s inventory of available sites must be evaluated for consistency with affirmatively furthering fair housing. The analysis must include how particular sites will meet the needs of all households, and how segregated living patterns will be replaced by integrated and balanced patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty to areas of opportunity.

Housing Element Programs: Explicitly address, combat, and relieve disparities resulting from past and current patterns of segregation to foster more inclusive communities, address disparities in housing needs and access to opportunity, and foster inclusive communities.

In April 2021, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) released its Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Guidance for All Public Entities and for Housing Elements (Guidance). In the Guidance, Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) is defined as "meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics.” A key component of AFFH is the assessment of fair housing. This evaluation identifies the factors that contribute to segregation, disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs that may be occurring in a community, which in turn informs the priorities and the actions a jurisdiction needs to take to promote integration in the Goals, Policies, and Programs section.

The City of Yreka is covered by 3 census tracts that intersect Yreka city limits and extend beyond the city limits.

The three census tracts are further subdivided into nine block groups that extend outside Yreka city limits. While there are 263 census blocks in Yreka, the available data at this level are limited to population and household counts, and racial and ethnic demographics. Fair housing data that is specific to the City of Yreka and Siskiyou county are limited. Data specific to the City and Siskiyou County has been included where available from the U.S. Census, American Community Survey (ACS), and the HCD AFFH Data and Mapping Resources Tool. 227
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 2 January 2023

1. REGULATORY BACKGROUND AND AFFH SETTING
Limited housing choice and access experienced by people within protected classes, such as race, sexual orientation, or disability, have far-reaching impacts on access to job opportunity, quality education, and mental and physical health. Residential segregation and exclusion, whether by race, ethnicity, disability, or income, is a result of numerous housing policies, practices, and procedures—both public and private—that have had enduring and pervasive negative impacts. (Guidance, pg. 5). The June 2020 analysis of fair housing impediments prepared by the state of California identified ten impediments to fair housing choice in the state (Executive Summary, Final 2020 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (ca.gov), accessed December 30, 2022, pg. 9):

1. Supply and Production of Affordable Homes: Inadequate supply and production of affordable homes available to low-income households and persons in protected classes.

2. Housing Preservation: Vulnerable supply of affordable housing stock threatens housing options for lower-income and protected households.

3. Housing Instability and Homelessness: Unequal access to supportive services, shelter, and affordable housing opportunities increases risk for persons experiencing homelessness, especially protected classes. The Coronavirus pandemic has exacerbated existing inequalities and vulnerabilities.

4. Fair Housing Education and Enforcement: Limited community awareness of fair housing protections and enforcement resources.

5. Tenant Protections and Anti-Displacement: Lack of uniform enforcement and adequate antidisplacement protections have left protected classes, such as communities of color, more vulnerable to displacement.

6. Disparities in Housing Quality and Infrastructure: Low-income households, rural communities, and persons in protected classes, are disproportionately experiencing severe housing problems, a lack of adequate housing options, and disparities in infrastructure.

7. Climate and Environmental Vulnerabilities: Low-income households and protected classes are often disproportionately impacted by climate change, environmental injustice, or unsustainable land use and development practices.

8. Historic and Lasting Impact of Segregation: Despite the repeal of explicitly racist and discriminatory housing laws, there remains a lasting legacy of segregation and resources disparities. Housing choice is often limited for persons of protected classes, including communities of color, to segregated concentrated areas of poverty.

9. Local Resistance and Exclusionary Land Use Policies Constrain Access to Opportunity: Denying, preventing, or rendering infeasible multifamily housing development, alternative housing strategies, and affordable housing limits access for low-income households, protected classes, and persons experiencing homelessness.

10. Insufficient Accessible Housing Stock: Lack of adequate accessible housing options, specifically for persons with mobility and sensory disabilities, limits housing choice for low-income households and people with disabilities.

The City of Yreka is located in Siskiyou county, in northern California. Siskiyou county is 4.06 million acres in size, of which less than 13,000 acres are urbanized. Siskiyou county has a total population of 44,076, making Siskiyou county rural with a low population density. The elevation of Siskiyou County ranges from 520 feet to 14,179 feet 228
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 3 January 2023
at Mt. Shasta. The county encompasses parts of five National Forests, six scenic rivers (Klamath, Sacramento, Salmon, Scott, Shasta and McCloud) as well as numerous lakes, streams and creeks, that providing numerous and a variety of recreation opportunities. There are eight incorporated cities in Siskiyou county. The seat of Siskiyou county government is in Yreka. Montague is the city located closest to Yreka, and is about seven miles east of Yreka. Yreka is approximately 10 square miles in size. As of the 2020 Census, Yreka had a population of 7,807 individuals.

Interstate 5 bisects Yreka in a north-south direction. Siskiyou Transit and General Express (STAGE) provides regional bus service that largely follows the Interstate 5 corridor with most stops located on or near Route 263.

There are 13 STAGE stops in Yreka. The city of Yreka does not operate a separate intracity bus service. This results in little to no transit service for neighborhoods that are east of Interstate 5. Madrone Hospice provides transportation for seniors 60 years or older. There is no rail service available in Yreka, although there is an intercity Amtrak route with a designated stop in the city of Dunsmuir, located approximately 46 miles south of Yreka.

The Yreka Union Elementary school district operates three schools: one transitional kindergarten, two elementary schools. Approximately 70 percent of students are eligible for the Free Lunch and Reduced-Price lunch programs, although none of the schools are indicated to be Title 1 schools.1 Yreka Union High district operates two schools. Approximately 52 percent of students are eligible for the Free Lunch and Reduced-Price lunch programs, although neither of the District’s schools are indicated to be Title 1 schools.1 All of these are public schools providing primary education to school-age residents of the Yreka and the surrounding area. All of the school campuses are located west of Interstate 5 and in proximity to the historic Downtown. College of the Siskiyous is a public community college with a second campus in the city of Weed. College of the Siskiyous is part of the California Community Colleges System, and is the northernmost college in California, and is the only college in Siskiyou County.

As discussed in Appendix A, Section 3.3.2, the City has an existing reasonable accommodation procedure that makes verbal and written requests available to residents with disabilities.

During the 5th housing element cycle, the city experienced significant staff turnover and has had issues with recruitment and retention. Many of the current staff have been working with the City for less than a year. This diminished the City’s ability to make significant progress of the Goals, Policies, and Programs set forth in the previous Housing Element update. A number of devasting wildland fires have occurred the region in recent years resulting in the loss of hundreds of homes, many of which have not been rebuilt. Within Yreka in a two year period from May of 2020 through May 2022, there were:
• 16 structure fire calls, although not all were major, • 48 vegetation or wildfires (again, this could be very small to small spot fire to half acre) and • Major fires in 2020 and 2022. The 2020 fire was within 10 miles of Yreka and was 450 acres in size. The 2022 McKinley fire triggered evacuations of residents in the western portions of the City.

A result of the wildfires in the region is Yreka’s ISO rating has been downgraded from a 3 to a 4, although the City plans to appeal this decision. One outcome of the downgrade is dramatic fire insurance rate increases. New fire insurance rates for homes located in the City are anticipated to be $2,000 to $4,000 annually, depending on the size and location of the residence. These new rates are about double the previous rates. During the early public input process, the City heard of several occurrences of home buyers, including first time homebuyers, being unable to purchase homes due the cost of fire insurance. As discussed further below, Yreka is considered a low229 City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 4 January 2023
income community because the median income is 80 percent or less of the statewide median income, as such current homeowners may not be able to afford premium increases resulting in underinsured homes for fire.

Underinsured homes may increase the risk of displacement if homeowners are unable afford to rebuild in the event of fire and a catastrophic loss.

As shown in Table A-28 of Appendix A, in 2019 the City of Yreka has a vacancy rate of 1.5 percent for rental units and there were no vacant ownership units. The 2019 vacancy rates are consistent with 2000 and 2010 rates, with the rate for rentals decreasing from 3 percent in 2000 to 2019’s rate of 1.5 percent. These are extremely low vacancy rates. As presented in Table A-27 in Appendix A, detached single family units make up 61 percent of the City’s housing stock, and nearly 60 percent of the housing units are owner occupied. The combination of extremely low vacancy rates, the fact that detached single family detached are the most common type of housing unit, and that most units are owner occupied indicates little room for mobility and high demand for the affordable units there are.

Generally, Yreka’s existing industrial areas are located in the southwest portion of town and east of Interstate 5.

This area experiences heavy commercial truck traffic in this area. According to the City staff, housing condemnations are more common in the eastern portions of the city.

1.1. KARUK TRIBAL LANDS
Yreka is within the designated service area of the Karuk Tribe, a federally and state recognized tribe, that has 3,751 Enrolled Tribal Members as of 2020, making the Karuk Tribe is the second largest tribe in California. 2 The
Bureau of Indian Affairs designates the entirety of Siskiyou county and an eastern portion of Humboldt County as the Karuk Tribe’s Service Area, which corresponds with the Karuk Tribe’s ancestral territory. 3 The Karuk Tribe
does not have a reservation because their treaties were not ratified by the U.S. Congress.2 Beginning in the late
1970s the Tribe began purchasing and assembling land in Orleans, Happy Camp, and Yreka, and has approximately 914 acres of Trust land, and 822 acres of Fee land as of 2020. 2 The lands are highly dispersed and
separated by great distances. The Tribe has land use authority of lands that held in Trust, and Trust lands are not subject to the local government’s land use regulations. Lands that the Tribe holds in Fee, however, are subject to the local government’s land use regulations.

Approximately 652 acres of Tribal Fee and Trust land are within Yreka’s city limits, most of this land is located at the southeast corner of Yreka city limits and shown in Figure 1A. One hundred forty-six (146) housing units for tribal members have been developed on this land. Thirty of those residences, referred to as KarukHomes I, were built using 2015 allocation of $874,302 in federal tax credits and $3,409,157 in state tax credits from the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (CTCAC) that were award to the Karuk Tribal Housing Authority.4 Tax credits
helped finance the construction of 30 new single-family homes (29 Housing Credit homes and one manager’s home). The Karuk Homes I development includes a mix of homes with three bedrooms at 1,918 square feet; four bedrooms at 2,004 square feet; and five bedrooms at 2,750 square feet. Three homes are targeted to households with annual incomes up to 30 percent of Area Median Household Income (AMI), eight homes are targeted for households up to 40 percent AMI, twelve homes are targeted for households up to 50 percent AMI, and six homes are targeted for households up to 60 percent AMI, with all units being affordable to lower income households who are Karuk Tribal members. The Karuk Tribe has an active and experienced tribal Housing Authority with offices in Yreka and Happy Camp. The Karuk Tribal Housing Authority (KTHA) has a portfolio of more than 180 affordable homes that they have developed and manage.

Nearby, the Karuk Tribe operates the Rain Rock Casino, which is also within the Yreka city limits and east of Interstate 5. There are two parcels that are trust land located on South Oregon Road in the Fairchild Medical 230
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 5 January 2023
Center neighborhood that is west of Interstate 5. These two parcels are used as health clinics and are fully developed, and are not shown on Figure 1A. The Casino is a source of employment for Karuk tribal members and residents of Yreka.

Karuk Tribal representatives and City officials meet every other month to discuss housing needs, economic development, management of infrastructure, health services, and other opportunities to collaborate and partner for the benefit of the City and the Tribe.

1.2. YREKA NEIGHBORHOODS
• For purposes of the AFFH analysis, the City has identified the following neighborhoods and a summary description of the neighborhood’s existing land use and land use patterns follows. Downtown: Yreka’s historic downtown generally occupies the northwest portion of the City and is west of Interstate 5. This portion of the City has denser residential development, with most residential structures configured as detached single family residences. There are more city parks and other public amenities located in this portion of the City. While there are commercial uses, there are fewer heavy commercial uses, and industrial uses are not present. Most of the public schools are located in this area. • The Karuk Tribal lands and associated Tribal housing development as shown in Figure 1A and discussed above in section 1.1.
• Campbell Tract Neighborhood: This neighborhood abuts the Karuk Tribal lands to the north and east.

The housing units are mostly configured as detached single family residences. Density in this neighborhood mixed, with some portions having a density similar to that seen in the Downtown, while other portions have low density with large lots. While there may be home-based business operating in this neighborhood, traditional brick-and-mortar commercial uses are not present in this this neighborhood.
• The Greenhorn Park neighborhood includes the namesake City park, and the geographic area south of Greenhorn Road and west of Interstate 5. East of the park are heavy commercial uses, visitor serving uses, and government facilities, i.e., Klamath National Forest Headquarters, Social Security Administration, and the Yreka campus of College of the Siskiyous. Further south along State Route 263, there are low density residential uses near the boundary of the Yreka city limits. • Fairchild Medical Center Neighborhood: In addition to the Fairchild Medical Center, a critical care facility, Fairchild Medical Center neighborhood features the Oakridge retirement community, a mobilehome park. Other land uses are a mix of light and heavy commercial uses especially adjacent to State Route 263.
• Southeast Neighborhood: The neighborhood on the east side of Interstate 5 and in the vicinity of the City’s southeastern boundary are commercial and heavy commercial uses that parallel Interstate 5. The commercial uses transition to low density residential uses moving east away from Interstate 5. • North Foothill Drive Neighborhood: The neighborhood in the northeast of the City that generally parallels North Foothill Drive features a mix of an established single family neighborhood, and four multifamily developments. There are commercial and heavy commercial uses also present in this neighborhood. Also, the Yreka RV Park is located in this neighborhood and provides RV spaces for visitors, and offers park model units for long term rental.

All four multifamily developments are income restricted and affordable developments via Low-Income Housing Tax Credits, HUD Section 202 funding, and/or USDA’s Section 515 rural rental housing program (for more details see Appendix A, Section 4.1.2, and Table A-57):
231
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 6 January 2023
o Sierra Vista Retirement Center. The Sierra Vista Retirement Center offers 29 affordable units for seniors via. All of Sierra Vista’s units are income restricted. The units are configured as detached units.
o The Juniper Terrace apartments are located at the City’s eastern boundary, and are northeast of the Sierra Vista Retirement Center. The Juniper Terrace apartments has 55 units, with one and two bedroom units, and is an affordable housing development. One hundred percent of the units are income restricted via low-income housing tax credits and. o Shasta Courtyards: 60 units. 100 percent of Shasta Courtyards’ units are affordable and are not age restricted. Units are configured as one and two bedroom units. o Emerald Pointe: 80 units. 100 percent of Emerald Pointe’s units are affordable and are set aside for seniors. Units are configured as one and two bedroom units. • Oberlin-Center Neighborhood: The area east of Interstate 5, lying between East Oberlin Road and East Center Street is largely undeveloped with residential uses; a review of Google Map imagery there are approximately five housing units in this neighborhood. The dominate land uses in this area are heavy commercial, industrial, and a cemetery.

1.3. COMPLIANCE WITH EXISTING FAIR HOUSING LAWS AND REGULATIONS Government Code § 65008 covers actions of a city, county, city and county, or other local government agency, and makes those actions null and void if the action denies an individual or group of individuals the enjoyment of residence, landownership, tenancy, or other land use in the state because of membership in a protected class, the method of financing, and/or the intended occupancy. The City encourages housing developments of all types, regardless of size, prospective tenant, or financing source, and supports by-right development in residential zones.

Government Code § 8899.50 requires all public agencies to administer programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing and avoid any action that is materially inconsistent with its obligation to affirmatively further fair housing. While City practices reflect this goal, the City has yet to adopt a policy or ordinance committing to this goal. As part of Program HE-3.1.1, the city is committed to annually reporting on whether the desired outcomes of its AFFH programs are being achieved, and to make adjustments to increase goal obtainment.

Government Code § 11135 et seq. requires full and equal access to all programs and activities operated, administered, or funded with financial assistance from the state, regardless of one’s membership or perceived membership in a protected class. The City adheres to these mandatory requirements when applying for and administering state programs.

Density Bonus Law (Government Code § 65915.). In 2014, the City adopted amendments to its density bonus provisions, Chapter 16.78 of Title 16, Yreka Municipal Code, to be consistent with that iteration of State density bonus law (SDBL). Since 2014 SDBL has received numerous substantive updates. Program HE-2.1.3 commits the City to updating its existing regulations to be consistent with SDBL. As presented in Chapter 3 which reviewed the effectiveness of the City’s 5th cycle housing element, the City received one application for the construction of 50 lower income housing units in the planning period (Siskiyou Crossroads, 2021) but the project proponent did not request a density bonus. While The City actively promotes the construction of new housing and will process all housing applications. Overall during the 5th cycle there was limited opportunities to implement the City’s existing density bonus regulations due to low levels of application/permit activity. 232
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 7 January 2023
Housing Accountability Act (Government Code § 65589.5.). The City Planning staff is familiar with recent amendments to the Housing Accountability Act, and actively monitors, no less than annually, online resources for legislative updates. Yreka is a member of the California League of Cities and receives legislative updates distributed by the League, which includes amendments to the Housing Accountability Act amongst others.

No Net Loss Law (Government Code § 65863). This housing element meets No Net Loss (NNL) requirements by providing capacity sufficient to meet the RHNA plus a minimum buffer of 20 percent additional capacity in all income categories. As compliance with NNL requires transactional review of development applications, both ministerial and discretionary, Program HE-1.1.1 memorializes and commits the City to conducting this review on a project-by-project basis, and to take the actions as required by State law should an inventory deficit as defined in NNL law. Additionally, Program HE-1.1.2 commits the City on an annual basis reviewing the status of its inventory and project whether a deficit may occur. Should a deficit be anticipated, the City will take steps to change the General Plan and zoning as needed to increase the amount of available land.

Least Cost Zoning Law (Government Code § 65913.1). As shown in the sites inventory of this housing element, the City has designated and zoned sufficient vacant land for residential use with appropriate standards in order to accommodate all income categories identified by the RHNA.

Excessive subdivision standards (Government Code § 65913.2.). The City complies. The City has no policies, ordinances, or recent practices that impose design controls or public improvement standards for the purpose of rendering development infeasible. Further, the City considers the effect of ordinances adopted and actions taken on the housing needs of the region.

Limits on growth controls (Government Code 65302.8.). The City does not currently impose growth controls or growth management practices.

2. PUBLIC OUTREACH
As described Chapter 1, Introduction, the City engaged community members and stakeholders in several venues.

The information obtained through public meetings, surveys, and stakeholder interviews, including the regional continuum of care, provide insight to the true needs of the community. More specifically, the City coordinated with the Continuum of Care network through Siskiyou County Health and Human Services during the process to engage the persons experiencing homelessness. The City interviewed caregivers, homeless youth programming staff, and received input from the individuals who are homeless. While the City’s RHNA may be low, the actual need of the community may be much greater. Through the public participation process the City can identify what issues and obstacles people may be experiencing when trying to find housing.

3. ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING
California Government Code Section 65583 (10)(A)(ii) requires the City of Yreka to analyze areas of segregation, racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs, including displacement risk. HCD’s Guidance document defines these terms to mean:

Disparities in Access to Opportunity: Defined by the AFFH Final Rule as “substantial and measurable differences in access to educational, transportation, economic, and other opportunities in a community based on protected class related to housing.

Disproportionate Housing Needs generally refers to a condition in which there are significant disparities in the proportion of members of a protected class experiencing a category of housing need when compared to 233
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 8 January 2023
the proportion of members of any other relevant groups, or the total population experiencing that category of housing need in the applicable geographic area. For purposes of this definition, categories of housing need are based on such factors as cost burden, severe cost burden, overcrowding, tenure (own vs. rent), homelessness, and substandard housing conditions.

Segregation generally means a condition in which there is a high concentration of persons of a particular race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, or having a disability or a type of disability in a particular geographic area when compared to a broader geographic area.

In most cases, Siskiyou county is used for regional comparison. State Highway 263 consistently shows up as line of separation across numerous fair housing indicators. Generally, populations residing east of Highway 263 are more likely to live below the poverty line and less likely to own their homes.

It is noted that the City of Yreka is not identified in the 2020 and 2021 TCAC mapping as an area of high segregation and poverty. There are mapped areas of high segregation and poverty in northwest and northeast Siskiyou County, however, these areas are outside the City limits and are not adjacent to the City. There are no racial and ethnic areas of concentrated poverty (R/ECAP) in the City or Siskiyou county. There are no areas in Yreka that were identified in the homeowners loan corporation (HOLC) redlining grade created during the New Deal Era, a federal government sponsored program that implemented housing segregation and discrimination.

3.1. INTEGRATION AND SEGREGATION PATTERNS
This section describes potential segregation patterns and trends as it relates to race and ethnicity, disability, familial status, income, and poverty. Where available, data from the ACS is mapped by census block groups to show the geographic distribution of each variable. To assess where there may be geographic patterns of segregation and integration, the City analyzed four characteristics: race and ethnicity, disability, income and familial status.

3.1.1. RACE AND ETHNICITY
Table B-1 below summarizes Yreka’s race and ethnicity as of the 2010 and 2020 Census, along with Siskiyou county. For both decennial censuses, Whites who are not Hispanic or Latino are the largest ethnic group, with persons who are Hispanic or Latino comprising the next largest ethnic group in Yreka. Racially, Whites alone are the largest racial group, with American Indian and Alaska Natives being the second largest racial group. As shown in , Whites are the dominate racial group across the City. However, since 2010 Yreka has become more ethnically and racial diverse with the number of Whites Alone decreasing by six percentage points. During the same time period the number and percentage points of persons who are Hispanic or Latino increasing by three percentage points. The number and percentage of persons who are American Indian and Alaska Native increased by more than four percentage points. The number and percentage of persons who are Asian Alone increased during the same period, as shown in below.

Table B-1
Race and Ethnicity, 2010 and 2020
City of Yreka Siskiyou County
2010 % 2020 % 2010 % 2020 %
Total 7,765 100% 7,807 44,900 100% 44,207
Hispanic or Latino 753 9.7 958 12.3 4,615 10.3 5,527 12.5 234
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 9 January 2023
City of Yreka Siskiyou County
2010 % 2020 % 2010 % 2020 %
Not Hispanic or Latino 7,012 90.3 6,849 87.7 40,285 89.7 38,549 87.2 Population of One Race: 6,649 85.6 6,192 79.3 38,445 85.6 35,454 80.2 White Alone 6,078 78.3 5,314 85.8 35,683 79.5 32,057 90.4 Black or African American 53 0.7 66 1.1 552 1.2 471 1.3 American Indian and Alaska Native 413 5.3 616 9.9 1,549 3.4 1,757 5 Asian Alone 90 1.2 147 2.4 528 1.2 866 2.4
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific
Islander 8 0.1 10 0.2 69 0.2 38 0.1
Some Other Race 7 0.1 39 0.6 64 0.1 265 0.8
Population of Two Races 321 4.1 612 8.4 1,840 4.1 2,894 6.6 White; Black or African American 26 8.1 47 7.7 153 8.9 262 9.1 White; American Indian and Alaska
Native 225 70.1 402 65.7 1,196 69.8 1,708 59
White; Asian 40 12.5 58 9.5 186 10.9 277 9.6
White; Some Other Race 5 1.6 77 2.3 50 2.9 466 16.1
White; Native Hawaiian and Other
Pacific Islander 3 0.9 14 12.6 22 1.3 79 2.7
All Other 22 6.9 14 2.3 107 6.2 102 3.5
Population of Three or More Races 42 0.5 45 0.6 126 0.3 201 0.5 Source: 2010 and 2020 US Census, Table P2
Figure 3 shows that geographically more diverse areas are at the City’s western, eastern and southern edges, as indicated by higher population percentages of Non-Whites residing in these geographic areas shown with gradations of brown shading. As shown in Figure 1, Diversity Index 2018 Block Group, the population residing east of State Highway 263 is more diverse with Diversity Index score of 58 whereas areas west of State Highway 263, are less diverse with Diversity Index scores of 44 (indicated with the light green shading) and 36 (yellow).5 The pattern of the City’s diversity index scores largely extend to the unincorporated areas adjacent to the City limits. The diversity scores of the unincorporated areas generally decrease as the distance from the City limits increase, indicating the City is more diverse. Where diversity decreases, residents tend to be White, nonHispanic. The 2020 geographic diversity pattern is similar to the pattern in 2010 with the area east of State Highway 263 being more diverse. The map of Neighborhood Segregation (Figure 2) shows geographic areas where groups have more than 10 percent representation within a given Census tract. For Yreka the data indicates the “3 Group Mixed” has the largest geographic distribution in Yreka: most of the area east of State Highway 263 and Fairchild Medical Center neighborhoods. The Downtown area is “Other-White”, and the western edges of the City and neighborhood south Greenhorn Road and south of the convergence of State Highway 3 and Interstate 5 are “Mostly White”. The patterns of neighborhood segregation occurring in the City continue outside the City limits, although further away from the City the population is increasing White, non-Hispanic. This pattern is consistent with the Table A-5 which shows 90.4 percent of residents of the County are White to the City’s 85.8 percent. The City’s greater diversity relative to the unincorporated area is consistent with the racial 235
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 10 January 2023
and ethnic composition data presented in Table A-5 in Appendix A. The data for ethnic distribution (Figure 3) presents a scattered distribution pattern, with areas where 20 percent or less are non-white being adjacent to areas where 61 percent or more of residents are Non-White.

To summarize, areas where there is an increased concentration of non-White residents, i.e., greater than 60 percent, as indicated in Figure 3, include the Karuk Tribal lands, and the following neighborhoods: Fairchild Medical Center, portions of Greenhorn Park, North Foothill Drive, small pockets in Downtown adjacent to State Route 263, and Oberlin-Center. The available data suggests concentrations of non-Whites relate to:
• Yreka is more ethnically and racially diverse in 2020 than in 2010 according to Census data. • Karuk Tribal housing is only available to tribal members in accordance with funding programs rules. • As reviewed below, some of the geographic areas discussed above that are more diverse, the data indicates there are concentrations for disability, lower incomes and greater rates of poverty, and more single parent households.

Regional Comparison
As shown in Table B-1 and Image 1, Whites are the predominate ethnic group in most of Siskiyou county. In the northeastern corner Hispanics are the dominate group. For both Yreka and the county there more Hispanics in 2020 than in 2010. Agriculture is a dominate industry in the northeastern corner and with a larger population of farmworkers. As indicated in Table B-1, American Indians and Alaska Natives are 2nd largest racial group in both the county and Yreka. In Yreka American Indians and Alaska Natives are a greater percentage of the population, comprising 9.9 percent of the population in comparison to 5 percent in the county.

Image 1
As discussed above Yreka is more diverse (as indicated by the 2018 Diversity Index value) than the areas just outside the city limits. Image 2 indicates that Yreka is similarly diverse to noncontiguous areas in the County, although the block group in the northeast corner has a higher diversity index. 236
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 11 January 2023
Image 2

3.1.2. PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
Persons with disabilities are more likely to reside east of Highway 263 and in the neighborhoods surrounding the Fairchild Medical Center. In these geographic areas more than 22 percent of the population have a disability, as shown in Figure 4. Approximately 17 percent of residents in the downtown area have a disability. The geographic areas having the lowest percentage of persons with disabilities are west of Downtown, the Greenhorn Road, and portions of the Campbell Tract neighborhoods. Table A-17 in Appendix A shows 46 percent of persons who are 65 and older have a disability in Yreka. The three most common types of disability for this age group are hearingvision, ambulatory, and self-care difficulties.

Concentrations of persons with disabilities in the above geographic areas relate, in part, to the North Foothill Drive neighborhood having two assisted housing developments that are age restricted to seniors. The fact these are relatively large and new multifamily developments that received state and/or federal funds, these projects would have been mandated to provide a minimum number of accessible units. This may contribute to the concentration of persons with disabilities. Like the age restrict developments in the North Foothill neighborhood, the Oakridge mobilehome park retirement community, will a concentration of seniors, which contribute to a concentration of persons with disabilities for some of the Fairchild Medical Center neighborhood.

Tribal members tend to have poorer health outcomes relative to the rest of the population which may cause disabilities, and the geographic concentration of the Karuk Tribal lands reflect, in part, these outcomes.

Regional Comparison
For purposes of comparison the City consulted the draft Siskiyou County Housing Element, dated October 19, 2022, as the draft Housing Element analyzed 2015-2019 ACS data, which is more recent than the data available on the AFFH data viewer. According to the County’s draft 6th cycle Housing Element (pg. 80), County staff found:

In the Northwestern Region and Southwestern Region, 20-30% of the population has a disability.

In the Northeastern Region, 10-20% of the population has a disability. In the Northern Region, 20-30% of the population has a disability with the exception of the areas surrounding Yreka (Census Tracts 7.01 and 7.02), where 10-20% of the population has a disability. In the 237
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 12 January 2023
Southeastern Region, 10-20% of the population has a disability with the exception of Census Tract 12, where 20-30% of the population has a disability.

Table B-2
Yreka and Siskiyou County Population by Age, 2019
Age Yreka 2019 Siskiyou County 2019*
Persons Percentage Persons Percentage
<5 608 8.0% 2,327 5.4%
5–14 1,111 14.7% 5,023 11.6%
15–24 726 9.6% 4,436 10.2%
25–34 1,217 16.1% 4,437 10.2%
35–44 945 12.5% 4,339 10.0%
45–54 597 7.9% 4,866 11.2%
55–64 844 11.2% 7,308 16.8%
65+ 1,514 20.0% 10,732 24.7%
Total 7,562 100% 43,468 100.0%
* Values include all cities and the unincorporated areas of Siskiyou county.

Source: Table DP05 2015-2019 ACS are estimates
More than 22 percent of Yreka residents who reside east of Interstate 5 and in the Fairchild Medical Center neighborhood have a disability. These two areas have the highest percentage of individuals who have a disability.

Seventeen to 20 percent of residents in the Downtown neighborhood have a disability, with the Greenhorn Park and Campbell Tract neighborhoods having the lowest percentage. The percentage of the population who have a disability and who reside east of Interstate 5, in the Fairchild Medical Center and Downtown neighborhoods is similar to the northwestern region and southwestern regions of the County. Like Yreka, individuals who are 65 and older are the largest age group in the county also, as shown in Table B-2. As show in Table B-3, for the regional nearly 48 percent of individuals who are 65 and older have a disability according to 2019 ACS data. This rate is greater than Yreka’s. (Note: similar data is reported in Appendix A, Tables A-17 and A-18, however, the range of time of the data contained in Appendix A is 2016-2020, whereas the data time range of Table B-3’s data is 2015-2019.)
Table B-3
Total Disabilities for Ages 65 and Older
Siskiyou county Yreka
Number Percent Number Percent
3,850 47.7% 596 41.6%
Source: 2015-2019 ACS S1810

3.1.3. INCOME AND POVERTY
The City also assessed incomes measures as household income is a critical variable affecting the ability of households to access housing. Figure 4B presents median income by Census block groups. Figure 4B shows the geographic extent of households having a median income between $30,000 to less than $50,000 to be the largest:
residents living east of State Highway 263 (except for the Campbell Tract neighborhood), the Fairchild Medical Center Neighborhood, and neighborhoods in the southeastern portion of Downtown. The household income for 238
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 13 January 2023
all other geographic areas is between $55,000 and $87,100. When Figure 4B’s data is compared to concentrations of poverty (Figure 5), similar patterns are observed: Figure 5 shows a greater percentage of Yreka residents, 20 to 30 percent, fall below the poverty line reside east of State Highway 263 and in Fairchild Medical Center neighborhoods.6
While a lower percentage of residents live at or below poverty line, 10 to 20 percent, reside in the neighborhoods in Yreka’s Downtown, this is another geographic concentration. In the Greenhorn Road Neighborhood west of State Highway 3, and at the City’s western edge, less than 10 percent of residents fall below the poverty line in these neighborhoods. Much of Yreka is considered a low-income community because the median income is 80 percent or less of the statewide median income. Table A-10 reports a significant difference in the median incomes of owners and renters: $53,611 and $29,662 both of which are less than 80 percent of the statewide median income of $78,672 as 2022. This data is consistent with Table A-9 “Households by Income Group, 2019”, which indicates nearly 38 percent of Yreka residents are low income with an annual income that does not exceed $33,987, 20 percent of residents are moderate income and 43 percent are above moderate income. There are no areas within Yreka’s city limits that have a poverty rate above 30 percent as show in Figure 5. Table B-4 below shows that 24.5 percent of Yreka households are below the poverty guideline (as of 2019). For Yreka female-headed households, 7.3 percent were below the poverty guidelines. (The 2019 poverty guideline was $25,750 for a household of four, and $16,910 for a household of two (https://aspe.hhs.gov/topics/poverty-economic-mobility/poverty-guidelines/prior-hhs-poverty-guidelinesfederal-register-references/2019-poverty-guidelines, accessed January 11, 2023).) Table B-4
Poverty Rates for Yreka and Siskiyou County Households
Yreka Siskiyou*
Total Householders 1,684 100% 11,396 100%
Female-Headed Householders Under the
Poverty Level 123 7.3% 602 5.3%
Total families Under the Poverty Level 413 24.5% 2029 17.8% * Values include all cities and the unincorporated areas of Siskiyou county.

Source: ACS 2015-2019, Table B17012
The data are showing similar concentration patterns for income as discussed above for other AFFH variables.

The 146 Karuk Tribal Housing Authority housing units are income qualified. North Foothill has four income restricted multifamily developments, and units are available only to income-qualified tenants. These four developments all together have a total of 224 housing units. Some of the existing land uses found in the Fairchild Medical Center may suggest why the median incomes in this neighborhood are lower: mobilehome parks, such as Oakridge, provide housing that is typically of lower cost and may be a more affordable housing option; proximity to heavy commercial uses, and the associated higher levels of noise, traffic, etc., are generally considered less desirable. The cost of housing units (purchase price and rent) may be less due to proximity to these less desirable land uses relative to other neighborhoods in the City. Similar to the Fairchild Medical Center neighborhood, median incomes in the Southeast and Oberlin-Center neighborhoods may reflect the closer proximity of heavy commercial uses resulting in housing costs that are more affordable. As state above, the City issues more housing condemnations in neighborhoods located east of Interstate 5. This information indicates housing may be more affordable to households with lower incomes due to condition issues. Also, this information suggests homeowners in neighborhoods east of Interstate 5 may be on fixed incomes and the ability to afford repairs and maintenance may be more financially difficult. 239
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 14 January 2023
As shown in Figure 4B there are no block groups in Yreka that are above HCD’s 2020 State median income of $87,100. As discussed in section 3.2.2 in Appendix A, the median income of Yreka is less than 80 percent of the State median income: approximately 58 percent of the city’s households have incomes at or below the lowincome limit. The remaining 43 percent of households have incomes above the low-income limit (8 percent of households earn incomes that fall into the moderate-income category; 35 percent of households fall into the above moderate-income category).

Regional Comparison
Figure 4.B of Appendix B displays ACS median income data (2015-2019) for Yreka. Image 3 below displays the same data but zoomed out to include the entire county for comparison purposes. As shown in Table B-4, a greater percentage of Yreka households are below the federal poverty guidelines in comparison to the Siskiyou county.

Image 3
The median household income in Yreka is similar with the median household income and patterns of the adjacent areas and the larger Siskiyou county region. Household median income of the block group residing in the northeast corner of the county is lowest at less than $30,000. There are no block groups in the Siskiyou county that are above HCD’s 2020 State median income of $87,100, and the median income of the region is less than 80 percent of the State median income.

Image 4 depicts the percentage of households whose income was below the poverty level for the region. There are two northern tracts with similar poverty levels as Yreka neighborhoods that are east of Interstate 5, and the Fairchild Medical Center neighborhood. The Siskiyou county western and eastern tracts see higher rates of poverty. Only the tract that nearly surrounds Yreka has poverty levels of less than 10 percent, which comports with the higher median income data that is seen for this same area in Image 3. The data for the corresponds to 240
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 15 January 2023
Image 4

3.1.4. FAMILIAL STATUS
As presented in Table A-6, Appendix A, families comprised a majority of households in Yreka in 2020, although the total number of family households declined from 2010. In 2020, a greater percentage of married-couple family households had children: 25 percent in 2010 and 27 percent in 2020. With respect to geographic distribution, married-couple households with children are most likely to reside west of State Highway 263, except for the Fairchild Medical Center neighborhoods and the portion of the Greenhorn Park neighborhood that southerly of the convergence of State Highway 3 and Interstate 5 as shown in Figure 6. As discussed in Appendix A, the total number single-parent households were nearly identical in 2010 and 2020 but the number and percentage of female householders, no spouse, and female householders, no spouse, with children relative to all family households declined from 2010 to 2020. Over 30 percent of children who live in female headed households, no spouse, are geographically concentrated in the area east of State Highway 263 (except for the Campbell Tract neighborhood where less than 10 percent of children live in female headed households, no spouse), as illustrated in Figure 7. In the southeast Downtown neighborhoods, 20 to 30 percent of children reside in female headed households, no spouse. In the neighborhoods around Fairchild Medical Center, 10 to 20 percent of children reside in female headed households, no spouse.

Single parent households, particularly female-headed households, generally have lower-incomes and higher living expenses, often making the search for affordable, decent and safe housing more difficult. In addition to difficulties faced by these households in finding and maintaining affordable housing, these households also typically have additional special needs relating to access to childcare, health care and other supportive services.

As presented in Appendix A, section 3.1, including Table A-6, from 2010 to 2020, Yreka saw decline in the female household, no spouse, with children, in both number and as a percentage. Male households, no spouse, with children, however, increased significantly during the same period. The relevant sections of Table A-6 are excerpted below in Table B-4.
241
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 16 January 2023
Table B-5
Yreka Single Parent Households with Children, 2010 and 2020 Household Type 2010 2020 % Change From
2010 to 2020
Number Percentage Number Percentage
FemaleHouseholder,no spouse, with
Children 378 64 260 71.2 (31.2)
MaleHouseholder, no spouse, with
Children 32 32.7 149 73.4 366
Excerpt of Table A-6, Appendix A. Negative values are shown in parathesis.

Sources:American Community Survey, 2010 and 2020, Table S1101 and Table B26001.

At this time, a geographic distribution of male headed households with children and no spouse is not available.

Given the perverseness of Yreka’s low median income throughout the City this analysis assumes the geographic distribution of male householders,no spouse, and with children aligns with the geographic distribution pattern of female headed households with children and no spouse. The highest rates of female headed households with children and no spouse occur east of Interstate 5. The concentration of female-headed households east of Interstate 5 is associated, in part, to the number of housing units that are assured to be affordable to incomequalified households. In the case of single parent households who are Karuk tribal members, the available of affordable housing units that are suitable for families would contribute the concentration of female headed households with children in this area.

Regional Comparison
The percentage and patterns of female headed households in Yreka, Figure 7, are similar those at the regional level, as indicated in Image 5. For the geographic southwestern, middle and eastern subregions of Siskiyou county, there are low percentage of children residing in female headed households with no spouse or patterner present. We see a similar pattern, generally, for children residing on west of Interstate 5. Twenty to 40 percent of children who reside in the other subregions of Siskiyou county are in female headed households with no spouse or patterner present. The geographic patterns where a higher percentage of children live in female headed households without a spouse or partner present are similar to those of poverty status seen in Image 4 above, except for the northeast corner of the county.
242
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 17 January 2023
Image 5

3.1.5. PROXIMITY TO JOBS
Generally, many Yreka residents live in relatively close to jobs according to Figure 8. Residents of Downtown neighborhoods have the furthest proximity to jobs, meaning these residents have the longest (as measured by distance) commute to reach jobs. This data indicates the northwestern portion of the City has a lowest number of job centers relative to the rest of the City. Overall, Yreka residents have relative low commute times with 88 percent of Yreka residents commuting less 30 minutes to their job, as indicated in Table A-10 in Appendix A.

Regional Comparison
Relative to the region, residents in Yreka, generally, reside in close proximity to jobs and employment, as shown by the blue and green polygons in Image 6. This data is positive for residents of Yreka. It may be an opportunity to attract economic and housing development to Yreka.

Image 6
243
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 18 January 2023

3.2. ACCESS TO OPPORTUNITY
The California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) Opportunity Areas mapping is an approach “to measure and visualize place-based characteristics linked to critical life outcomes, such as educational attainment, earnings from employment and economic mobility” (Methodology for the 2021 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Map, pg. 1). The indicators indexed include high levels of employment and close proximity to jobs, access to effective educational opportunities for both children and adults, low concentration of poverty, and low levels of environmental pollutants, among others. Moderate resource areas have access to many of the same resources as high and highest resource areas but may have longer commutes to places of employment, lower median home values, fewer educational opportunities, or other factors that lower their indices for economic, environmental, and educational indicators. Areas of high segregation and poverty are those that have an overrepresentation of people of color compared to the County, and at least 30 percent of the population in these areas is below the federal poverty line ($26,200 annually for a family of four in 2020). Geographic areas with higher resource scores indicate areas that support positive economic, educational, and health outcomes for low-income families. HCD recommends jurisdictions consult these maps as part of their AFFH analysis to help identify opportunity areas to locate and prioritize affordable housing. The maps are used by TCAC to evaluate and rank funding application for housing.

3.2.1. ECONOMIC DOMAIN
The TCAC economic domain metric considers poverty, education attainment of the adult population, proximity to jobs job and median home value indicator. For Yreka, the most positive economic outcomes are likely for populations residing on the western side of the side as shown in green in Figure 9 and in the Campbell Tract neighborhood.

The economic outcome value assessed for the Karuk Tribal Lands and in the North Foothill Drive neighborhood appears to reflect, at least in part, the presence of over 200 assisted housing units. The Greenhorn Park neighborhood assessment as having "more positive economic outcomes” is likely attributed to the numerous commercial and visitor serving business in this neighborhood making it a local job center. Also, at the southerly city limit there is a neighborhood of detached single family residences that are separated by distance from the commercial and visitor serving uses. This distance may improve the home values of the housing units. The areas of the Downtown neighborhood assessed to have more positive economic outcomes reflects the relative higher median incomes and lower rates of poverty. Residents in this area are more likely to have higher educational attainment. These socioeconomic attributes all together likely manifest as higher property values. The Fairchild Medical Center and the neighborhood is not fully developed. There may be opportunities for mixed use development with housing, including employee housing, that complements medical uses.

3.2.2. EDUCATION DOMAIN
For the education domain, the TCAC factors math and reading proficiency, high school graduation rates, and student poverty. The 2020 assessment of Greenhorn Park sub-neighborhood as having a less positive education outcome (0.25-0.50 in comparison to 0.50-0.75 for much of the city) seems inaccurate and may reflect the numerous commercial and visitor serving uses in this area. The newer TCAC data indicates the likelihood of positive outcomes in the education domain across the City decreased from 2020 to 2021. This decline may reflect the challenges of virtual-teaching for both educators, students, and families during the COVID-19 pandemic, and declines have been near-universal. As of the beginning of the 2022-2023 academic year all Yreka public schools have returned to in person instruction. Yreka public schools are located in the Downtown and Fairchild Medical Center neighborhoods. Students who reside beyond walking distance, the school districts offer bus service, 244
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 19 January 2023
which extends to the North Foothill Drive neighborhood and Karuk Tribal Lands. As discussed above, all of the schools participate in state and federal school lunch programs.

Improving opportunities to develop a variety of housing types, including housing that is affordable, in proximity to schools will support education opportunities. Because the schools are located in neighborhoods that are established and generally development is denser, City housing policies that encourage ADUs, SB 9 housing, infill development, and adaptive reuse will enable more housing and different types to be developed near existing schools.

3.2.3. ENVIRONMENTAL DOMAIN
This domain relies on twelve of the indicators that are used in the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA)’s CalEnviroScreen 3.0 tool which are subcomponents of the “pollution burden”.

The twelve indicators are grouped into two categories, “exposure” and “environmental effects”:

Exposure indicators: Environmental effects indicators:

1. Ozone Concentrations 8. Cleanup Sites

2. PM2.5 Concentrations 9. Groundwater Threats

3. Diesel PM Emissions 10. Hazardous Waste Generators and Facilities

4. Drinking Water Contaminants 11. Impaired Water Bodies

5. Pesticide Use 12. Solid Waste Sites and Facilities

6. Toxic Releases from Facilities

7. Traffic Density
The ranking of outcomes in the environmental domain are illustrated in Figure 11. Yreka’s Downtown neighborhoods are ranked as having the most positive environmental outcomes. Most neighborhoods lying east of State Highway 263 and in and around Fairchild Medical Center ranked below the Downtown neighborhoods.

Neighborhoods in the western edges of the City, south of the convergence of State Highway 3 and Interstate 5 and south Greenhorn Road were ranked to have the least positive outcomes. Lower environmental scores reflect historic and current heavy commercial and industrial uses.

3.2.4. TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC TRANSIT
Yreka and Regional Comparison
HUD developed the transportation cost index that “estimates of transportation expenses for a family that meets the following description: a 3-person single-parent family with income at 50% of the median income for renters for the region” at the Census tract level (HCD AFFH Data Resources and Mapping Tool, accessed January 11, 2023). The lower the index score, the higher the transportation costs. Index scores are affected by the availability of public transit, the density of housing, services and jobs in a community. The entirety of Yreka and Siskiyou county have the lowest transportation index score of 0-20 (where 79-99 is the highest score). For a large rural county, and Yreka being relatively low density city, and with a declining population in the region there are not many transit options beyond those provided by private vehicles and the Siskiyou Transit and General Express (STAGE).

As discussed above, the STAGE provides regional bus service that largely follows the Interstate 5 corridor with most Yreka stops located on or near Route 263. All STAGE buses are ADA compliant. STAGE offers discount annual passes for income eligible households. There are 13 STAGE stops in Yreka. The city of Yreka does not operate a separate intracity bus service. This results in little to no transit service for neighborhoods that are east 245
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 20 January 2023
of Interstate 5. At this time there are few transit opportunities for residents who reside in the neighborhoods on the east of Interstate 5. Madrone Hospice provides transportation for seniors 60 years or older. There is no rail service available in Yreka, although there is an intercity Amtrak route with a designated stop in the city of Dunsmuir, which is located approximately 46 miles south of Yreka.

3.2.5. AREAS OF OPPORTUNITY
According to the 2020 TCAC Opportunity Areas (Figure 12), the Highest, High and Moderate resource areas all occur west of State Highway 263, with almost the entirety of the area east of Highway 263 and Interstate 5 identified as Low Resource, except for the Campbell Tract neighborhood.

The TCAC mapping identifies the Highest Resource area as the northern and western portions of Yreka’s historic Downtown neighborhood that lie west of State Highway 263, as shown on Figure 12. The Highest Resource area is contiguous and extends northerly outside City limits. This Downtown sub-neighborhood is identified as a Highest Resources area due to the higher median income, more positive environmental outcomes, including better proximity to public amenities—parks, schools, etc.—and education outcomes on par with the most of Yreka. While this sub-neighborhood has infill development opportunities, its northern and western edges are within or abut a Very High Fire Severity zones, meaning housing in at greater risk from wildland fire.

There are three High Resource areas. The largest is southerly of the convergence of State Highway 3 and Interstate 5, and is a Greenhorn Park sub-neighborhood. The other High Resource areas are a neighborhood sandwiched between Lane and French streets that is west of State Highway 263. This High Resource area straddles the Fairchild Medical Center and Downtown neighborhoods. The third High Resource area is the Campbell Tract neighborhood. The educational outcome scores are more positive (with a score of 0.50 to 0.70) and are on par with the outcomes for much of Yreka including the Highest and Lowest Resource areas. The neighborhood sandwiched between Lane and French streets has opportunities for infill development. While the other two other High Resources areas, especially the Greenhorn Park sub-neighborhood, both have growth potential, these areas are also on the edge of the City making schools, services, business and transit less proximate.

The areas assessed to be Low Resource are most areas lying east of State Highway 263 and the Fairchild Medical Center neighborhood. As discussed earlier in this appendix, the geographic areas east of Interstate 5 consistently have lower incomes and higher rates of poverty, higher concentrations of persons with disabilities. This area, however, is more ethnically and racial diverse relative to other Yreka neighborhoods. Although it is designated as a Low Resource area, educational outcomes are more positive (with a score of 0.50 to 0.70) and are on par with the outcomes for much of Yreka. As discussed above, the Fairchild Medical Center neighborhood may have attributes that could be leveraged to attract mixed use types of development that include a variety of housing types that complement the medical facilities. Employee housing and housing that designed to meet the housing needs seniors and people with disabilities. The Fairchild Medical Center neighborhood is served by STAGE and commercial services are in the area.

While the two tracts used by the Health Places Index (HPI) includes unincorporated greater Yreka, they include a significant portion of the City. As shown on Figure 12.B, the HPI data further indicates Downtown Yreka and westward, have socio-economic attributes indicating it is an area of higher opportunity:
• 100 percent of the households have housing with complete kitchens and plumbing, whereas the eastern tract 95.1 percent of households are residing in dwellings with complete kitchens and plumbing. 246
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 21 January 2023
• 20 percent of the population older than 25 have bachelor’s education or higher, whereas 16.3 percent of the population have attained at least bachelor’s education. • 91 percent of the population residing in the western tract have automobile access, compared to 84 percent of the population residing in the eastern tract. Reduced automobile affects mobility for jobs, access to basic goods and services, and overall affect access to opportunities, especially if public transit options are limited
• Nearly 99 percent of the population residing in the western tract have access to nearby parks and other open spaces; whereas nearly 61 of the population of access to nearby parks for the eastern tract. • The reported employed percentage for the two tracts is nearly identical: 66.3 percent of the population residing in the eastern tract being employed, and 66.2 percent of those residing in the western tract being employed.7
The HPI scores depicted on Figure 12.B are a composite of the indicators discussed above and additional variables. The tract that is blue overall has healthier community conditions than 22 percent of other California tracts. The dark green tract that covers the northern part of the City has healthier community conditions than nearly 51 percent of other California tracts. The overall community health conditions are nearly 42 percent better than other tracts in California for areas that are green. The programs in Chapter 2 aim to not only improve access to opportunity in the higher resource areas of the City, the programs also seek to improve conditions in areas that have lower resource attributes. The programs include changes to the City’s land use regulations to remove regulatory and procedural barriers to housing production and allowing more diverse types of housing by-right.

Not only will the City take an active role to partner with housing developers, but it will improve the information available about ADU and SB 9 housing developments for property owners. Uniformly this information will be made available on the City’s website. The programs commit the City to applying for funding for workforce and affordable housing development but also for an owner-occupied rehab program that is oriented to property owners and correcting housing conditions.

Regional Comparison
When comparing composite opportunity scores regionally (Image 7 and Figure 12), unlike Yreka, Siskiyou county contains contain tracts identified as areas of high segregation and poverty. These tracts are located in western and northeastern portions of the county. These areas are rural, generally are far from job centers, historically the economies of these areas have been resource dependent, the availability of local goods and services are limited along with public transportation options, and access to local healthcare options are few. Yreka’s highest resource area are the sub-neighborhoods located at the northern and western edges of the Downtown neighborhood.

Siskiyou county contains tracts that are rated as high resource or highest resource, and are near Yreka. 247
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 22 January 2023
Image 7

3.3. DISPROPORTIONATE HOUSING NEED AND DISPLACEMENT RISK The AFFH analysis needs to report the community’s housing problems especially for low income households. The data indicate many households are cost burdened, and some households are living in units that do not have adequate kitchen or plumbing. The four housing problems considered are listed below, and in Yreka, 23 percent of households are experiencing at least one of the following housing problems:

1. Incomplete kitchen facilities;

2. Incomplete plumbing facilities;

3. More than 1 person per room (also referred to as overcrowding); and

4. Cost burden greater than 30 percent.

3.3.1. HOUSING HABITABILITY
Yreka and Regional Comparison
Housing habitability as measured by completeness of kitchen and plumbing facilities are not reported at the city level, rather the data is reported at the broader Census tracts as part of the California Healthy Place Index (https://map.healthyplacesindex.org, accessed July 6, 2022). This tract contains a significant portion of eastern Yreka, and 95 percent of households have basic kitchen facilities and plumbing. In comparison to households in Siskiyou county and the State, the Yreka Census tract has a lower percentage of households with complete kitchens and complete plumbing. For comparison:
• Siskiyou county: 98 percent of households have basic kitchens and plumbing • California: 98.7 percent of households having basic kitchen and plumbing.

As discussed above in Section 3.1.3, the City issues more housing condemnations in neighborhoods located east of Interstate 5, which corresponds with the geographic area depicted housing habitability of the CaliforniaHealth Place Index. This local information indicates housing in these areas may be more affordable to households with lower incomes due to condition issues. Also, this information suggests homeowners in neighborhoods east of Interstate 5 may be on fixed incomes and unable to afford repairs and maintenance. To address habitability 248
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 23 January 2023
issues, the Housing Element includes a program committing the City to seeking funding to develop an owneroccupied rehabilitation program that would provide low-interest loans, grants, labor, or materials to assist lowincome, older adults, or residents with disabilities make needed home repairs.

3.3.2. COST BURDEN AND OVERCROWDING
While the median gross rent for Yreka and surrounding area is less than $1,000 a month, the American Community Survey data indicate 40 to 60 percent of renter households pay 30 percent or more of their household income to rent (see Figure 14), which nearly the entirety of the City. This indicates while Yreka rents may be low relative to other communities, renter annual median income is less than $30,000, as indicated above, and household incomes are not adequate. For the Karuk Tribal lands and the North Foothill neighborhood, the rate of cost burden may be less than depicted in Figure 14. The rate is like to be less that mapped in Figure 14 because there are 224 income restricted housing units in these areas. These units are set aside to be affordable to lower income households, and prospective tenants are income-screened to ensure eligibility. For households residing in market rate rental units in these neighborhoods, the concentration mapping in Figure 14 is more likely to be accurate because these units would not be subject to enforceable affordability agreements. The extent of concentration suggests that renter annual median income contributes to cost burden households.

The AFFH data viewer does not have mapping available depicting overcrowding for the City of Yreka, nor does the City have firsthand knowledge of overcrowding. Overcrowding is defined by the US Census as more than

1.01 persons per room. Severe overcrowding occurs when there are more than 1.5 persons per room. Table A-32 in Appendix A indicates the number and percentage of units in the city according to occupants per room. Less than 1 percent of owner-occupied housing units and less than 2 percent of renter-occupied units were either overcrowded or severely overcrowded in 2019. Overcrowding is strongly correlated to family size, with large families more likely to experience overcrowding. According to Table A-24 in Appendix A, in 2019 approximately

4.1 percent of owner-occupied are large families with five or members, and 3.4 percent of renter households have five or members. This is decline of 2.5 percent points over 2010. Overcrowding conditions are also more likely to occur when households are cost burdened. Cost burdened households have decreased mobility. While mapping that specifically depicts the geographic distribution of overcrowding in Yreka is not currently available, Figures 13 and 14 can be consulted as a proxies: Figure 13 shows 40 to 60 households in the Fairchild Medical Center neighborhood and almost entirely all neighborhoods that are east of Interstate 5 are renters. Figure 14 shows the same neighborhoods as depicted in Figure 13 are cost burdened. As discussed above, due to the number of assisted housing units located on Karuk Tribal lands and in the North Foothill neighborhood the rate of overpayment may be overstated.

Regional Comparison
As seen in Image 8, the southern and eastern portions are the largest geographic area in Siskiyou county where 40 to 60 percent of renters are paying more than 30 percent of their household income to housing. There is also a northern tract where 40 to 60 percent of renters are cost burdened. These patterns are similar to Yreka pattern. 249
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 24 January 2023
Image 8
In the northeast corner of Siskiyou county, the data indicates overcrowding conditions (Image 9) are occurring.

This is the same geographic area where household incomes were among the lowest at less than $30,000, 30 to 40 percent of the population income was below the poverty level, and Hispanics are a sizeable ethnic group.

Image 9

3.3.3. VULNERABLE TO DISPLACEMENT
Yreka and Regional Comparison
Figure 15 depicts the geographic area of the Yreka population who are vulnerable to displacement (thereby being designated as sensitive) due to changes housing market conditions that drastically increase the cost of housing, or displacement related to increases in redevelopment and gentrification. While some Yreka neighborhoods have become more diverse racially and ethnically since 2010, the data indicates residents in these neighborhoods tend to have lower incomes, are more likely to be renters and cost burdened, experience overcrowding, and live in housing in poor condition, as discussed above in the preceding sections. 250
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 25 January 2023
Table B-6
Population is Considered Vulnerable to Displacement if:

Vulnerable to Displacement Criteria: Yreka: Is the criteria met? The share of very low income residents is
above 20%
Yes; 47.8 percent of households in the Figure 15 area are low income
And the area meets at least two of the following
criteria:

Share of renters is above 40 percent Yes; 50.9% of households in the Figure 15 area are renter households.

Share of people of color is above 50
percent
No; share of people of color is 34 percent
Share of very low-income households (50
AMI or below) that are severely rent
burdened households is above the county
median
Yes, very low income households, less than $38,950 for a family four (2022) median income and more than 60% of
renter households are severely cost burdened
The populations, or those in close
proximity, have been experiencing
displacement pressures.*
No, According to the AFFH data viewer, indicators of
displacement pressures include if a geographic area is in a hot real estate market: and at this time, the area is not a hot real estate market.
*Displacement pressure is defined as percent change in rent above county median for rent increases, or the difference between tract median rent and median rent for surrounding tracts above median for all tracts in county (rent gap).

Image 10 shows that the same population in northeastern corner of Siskiyou being vulnerable to displacement due. This is attributed to housing needs discussed above.

Image 10
251
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 26 January 2023

4. ENFORCEMENT AND OUTREACH CAPACITY
No lawsuits or actions have resulted from discrimination complaints related to compliance with existing fair housing laws. The City implements fair housing laws by ensuring the City’s procedures, policies and regulations comply with state and federal fair housing laws, and by implementation of the code enforcement program. The City’s code enforcement is compliant driven where received complaints are investigated by a building inspector.

While the City has reasonable accommodation procedures, it is undertaking a comprehensive update of the Zoning Code to modernize the Zoning Code to facilitate improvements to overall housing production, allowing a variety of housing types for all income categories, such as workforce housing, missing middle housing types and configurations, group homes, so all community members have access to affordable and sound housing.

In addition to fair housing issues related to regulations, fair housing issues can also include discriminatory behaviors by landlords such as refusal to grant reasonable accommodation requests, not allowing service animals, discrimination against familial status, sex, religion, or other protected class, and more. The City posts fair housing posters from the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing at City Hall to assist those with discrimination complaints. As complaints are received, individuals are directed to the appropriate agency.

The City will continue to make information on fair housing available to the public by posting fair housing information in City Hall, the public library, other public buildings, the Senior Center and on bulletin boards at existing apartment complexes. Program HE-6-1.2 commits the City to continuing marketing fair housing information to the public including making information available on the website. The City will continue to support the enforcement of the fair housing laws to protect against housing discrimination, provide adequate information about renters’ rights, and promote equal housing opportunity.

HUD’s Region IX Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) fair housing data set indicates two cases were filed from 2006 to June 2020 for all of Siskiyou county during the 14 year reporting period. This is a case rate of 0.05 cases per one thousand of the population. Both were disability bias cases. According to the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing 2020 annual report, there was one housing violation for the Siskiyou county region (the type of violation, e.g., disability, race, etc. is not indicated). Available data regarding inquiries to the office of Fair housing and Equal Opportunity from residents about possible discrimination indicates Yreka’s inquiry rate was less than 0.25 per one-thousand people for the period of January 2013 to March 2021. A resident may not further pursue an inquiry for a variety of reasons. While underreporting may occur, the available data indicates low incident rate of housing discrimination in the City. In addition to continuing to make fair housing information available, Program HE-6-1.2 commits the City to codifying its reasonable accommodation procedures into the Zoning Code, and marketing the availability of the procedures to the public.

This Program includes review the current procedures for compliance with federal and state fair housing law, and preparing amendments as needed.
252
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 27 January 2023

5. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
Discussions with community organizations, fair housing advocates, and the assessment of fair housing issues identified the following factors that contribute to fair housing issues in Yreka. See Chapter 2, Program 3.1.1, for details regarding specific actions, geographic target areas, deliverables and metrics for determining success, and milestones and timeline.

Priority
(high,
medium, low)
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
City AFFH Action
(see Chapter 2, Program

3.1.1 for details)
High There are shortages of:
• workforce housing to purchase
and to rent
• housing that is affordable to
seniors,
• housing that is accessible and
affordable for persons with
disabilities.

Employers are losing employees or
cannot attract employees because of
their inability to secure safe and
decent housing.

The dominance of single-family homes despite the presence of smaller households (single person), with little diversity in the types of housing.

Displacement from the wildfires and loss of housing, e.g., the Slater fire. These events destroyed homes, displacing residents, and resulting in increased demand for housing in region.

Low-vacancy rates for both rental and ownership units, which reduces turnover, and limits the availability of affordable housing options;
New housing choices and
affordability:

See Program 3.1.1
Id #s: 2.a, 2.b, 2,c
Medium The housing stock, especially units
east of Interstate 5, needs repair and
rehabilitation, including accessibility
improvements.

High cost of new construction and rehabilitating existing residences including City fees;
Housing condition of the overall inventory of housing, and the cost of repairs where needed
Housing rehab and
conservation and
implement Replacement
Housing law
See Program 3.1.1
Id #s: 4.a, 4.b
Medium Households vulnerable to
displacement.

City-wide median income that is less
than 80% of State median, and
Displacement resulting from a wide variety of conditions, for example, COVID-19 resulted in an economic depression and the loss of many incomes.

Cost burdened households, especially renter households.

Funding to transform
low resource areas to
high resource areas,
neighborhood
revitalization, job
creation, housing
253
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 28 January 2023
Priority
(high,
medium, low)
Fair Housing Issue Contributing Factors
City AFFH Action
(see Chapter 2, Program

3.1.1 for details)
patterns of concentration based on
income, lack of access to opportunity
mobility and reduce
displacement of
residents
See Program 3.1.1
Id #s: 2.a, 2.b, 2,c
Medium Fair Housing Education: Limited
community awareness of fair housing
protections and enforcement
resources.

Lack of information made easily available to homeowners and tenants on their fair housing rights and opportunities.

Fair housing education:

Develop and distribute
fair housing outreach
materials that informs
City officials and
community members of
available fair housing
resources and
opportunities. Conduct
proactive outreach to
improve distribution of
information and to
educate community
members.

See Program 3.1.1, Id #s

5.a, 5.b, 5.c, 5.d, 5.e
254
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 29 January 2023

6. LIST OF AFFH FIGURES
Figure # Figure Title
1A Karuk Tribal Lands
1 Diversity Index
2 Neighborhood Segregation
3 Ethnic Population Distribution - Percent Non-White
4 Percent of Population with a Disability
4B Median Income
5 Poverty Status by Census Tract
6 Percent of Children in Married-Couple Households
7 Percent of Children in Female Headed Households
8 9
10 11
12 12B
13 14
15 Jobs Proximity Index
TCAC Opportunity Areas - Economic
TCAC Opportunity areas - Education
TCAC Opportunity Areas - Environment
TCAC Opportunity Areas - Composite Score
Healthy Places Index
Renter Occupied Housing Units
Overpayment by Renters
Sensitive Communities - Displacement
16 Fire Hazard Severity
255
City of Yreka 6th Cycle Housing Element
DRAFT B - 30 January 2023
1 National Center for Education Statistics, https://nces.ed.gov/, accessed December 30, 2022.

2 Tribal Government Profile and Summary, https://www.karuk.us/images/docs/hr-files/Karuk-Tribal_Government_ Fact Sheet 2020.final.pdf, Karuk Tribe, accessed December 30, 2022. 3 Karuk Tribe Service Area Map, https://www.karuk.us/images/docs/Land_Management/Service_Area_with_Base_ Map.pdf, accessed December 30, 2022.
4 Affordable Housing Tax Credit Coalition, https://www.taxcreditcoalition.org/gallery/karuk-homes-1/, accessed January 5, 2023.
5 The Diversity Index indicates the probability that two people chosen at random will be from different race and ethnic groups. For more information about the index and measuring racial and ethnic diversity, see the US Census blog, https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2021/08/measuring-racial-ethnic-diversity-2020-census.html (accessed June 14, 2022).
6 In 2019, the poverty line was $25,750 for a family of four, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:
2019 Poverty Guidelines | ASPE (hhs.gov), accessed June, 21, 2022. 7 While the retail density differential between the western and easter tracts is significant with the western tract having 3.3 jobs per acre, and the 0.87 jobs per acre for the eastern tract, this may be more of a function of the difference in the size between the two areas. The mapping indicates the eastern tract is at least twice the size of the western tract. 256
Karuk
Tribe
¬«3
¬«263
¬«3
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community [
0 0.5 1 Miles
Map Date: 1/3/2023
City of Yreka
Tribal Lands
Figure Karuk Tribe
Trust and Fee Lands
B - 31 257
1A
Greenhorn Resevoir
(no data)
¬«3
¬«263
¬«3
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community [
0 0.5 1 Miles
Map Date: 1/10/2023
City of Yreka
Diversity Index 2018
(Block Group)
Higher Diversity
≤85.0
≤70.0
≤55.0
Lower Diversity
Figure 1 City of Yreka
Diversity Index
Divsersity Index represents the
likelihood that two people, chosen at
random from the same area, belong to
different race or ethnic groups.

Yreka City CouncilFebruary 7, 2023

Yreka City Council
February 7, 2023