Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Yuba City City Council
August 16, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
August 16, 2022
Body
Yuba City City Council
Pages
403
Original file
50.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on yubacityca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

73 areas of highest sensitivity are closer to the Feather River. In addition, the Sacred Lands File failed to identify any sacred lands or tribal resources in or near the project area.

3.18.6 Thresholds of Significance
AB 52 established that a substantial adverse change to a TCR has a significant effect on the environment.

The thresholds of significance for impacts to TCRs are as follows:

Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change to a TCR, defined in Section 21074 as sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a Native American tribe that are:
 Included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources;
 Included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision k of Section 5010.1; and/or
 Determined by the City to be significant, as supported by substantial evidence, including:
o A cultural landscape with a geographically defined boundary; o A historical resource as described in Section 21084.1 (either eligible for or listed on the California Register of Historical Resources or listed on a local registry); o A unique archaeological resource as defined in Section 21083.2; and/or o A non-unique archaeological resource as defined in Section 21083.2.

In assessing substantial adverse change, the City must determine whether or not the project will adversely affect the qualities of the resource that convey its significance. The qualities are expressed through integrity. Integrity of a resource is evaluated with regard to the retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association [CCR Title 14, Section 4852(c)]. Impacts are significant if the resource is demolished or destroyed or if the characteristics that made the resource eligible are materially impaired [CCR Title 14, Section 15064.5(a)]. Accordingly, impacts to a TCR would likely be significant if the project negatively affects the qualities of integrity that made it significant in the first place. In making this determination, the City need only address the aspects of integrity that are important to the TCR’s significance.

3.18.7 Impact Assessment/Environmental Consequences:
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k).

There are no significant buildings on the property that will be removed as part of this project. Therefore, there will be no potential significant impacts on any historical resources, directly or indirectly. b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1.

In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

The UAIC provided that no known TCRs were identified (as defined in Section 21074) within the proposed project area. Given the level of previous disturbance within the Project area, it is not expected that any

Page 299 of 403 ends

74 TCRs would remain. However, during grading and excavation activities, there is a potential to encounter native soils, which may contain undiscovered TCRs. In the unlikely event resources are discovered during ground disturbing activities that are associated with Native American culture, compliance with the TCR Mitigation Measures provided below would reduce the potential impacts to a less than significant level.

3.18.8 Tribal Cultural Mitigation Measures
Tribal Cultural Resources Mitigation 1: Post Ground Disturbance A minimum of seven days prior to beginning earthwork, clearing, and grubbing, or other soil disturbing activities, the applicant shall notify lead agency of the proposed earthwork start-date. The lead agency shall contact the United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC) with the proposed earthwork start-date and a UAIC Tribal Representative or Tribal Monitor shall be invited to inspect the project site, including any soil piles, trenches, or other disturbed areas, within the first five days of groundbreaking activity, or as appropriate for the type and size of the project. During this inspection, a UAIC Tribal Representative or Tribal Monitor may provide an on-site meeting for construction personnel information on TCRs and workers awareness brochure.

If any TCRs are encountered during this initial inspection, or during any subsequent construction activities, work shall be suspended within 100 feet of the find and measures included in the Unanticipated Discoveries Mitigation Measure 2 shall be implemented. Preservation in place is the preferred alternative under CEQA and UAIC protocols, and every effort must be made to preserve the resources in place, including through project redesign.

The contractor shall implement any measures deemed by CEQA lead agency to be necessary and feasible to preserve in place, avoid, or minimize significant effects to the resources, including the use of paid Native American Monitor during ground disturbing activities.

Tribal Cultural Resources Mitigation 2: Unanticipated Discoveries: If any suspected TCRs are discovered during ground disturbing construction activities, all work shall cease within 100 feet of the find, or an agreed upon distance based on the project area and nature of the find. A Tribal Representative from a California Native American Tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with a geographic area shall be immediately notified and shall determine if the find is a TCR (PRC 21074). The Tribal Representative will make recommendations for further evaluation and treatment as necessary.

Preservation in place is the preferred alternative under CEQA and UAIC protocols, and every effort must be made to preserve the resources in place, including through project redesign. Culturally appropriate treatment may be, but is not limited to, processing materials for reburial, minimizing handling of cultural objects, leaving objects in place within the landscape, returning objects to a location within the project area where they will not be subject to future impacts. The Tribe does not consider curation of TCR’s to be appropriate or respectful and request that materials not be permanently curated, unless approved by the Tribe.

The contractor shall implement any measures deemed by the CEQA lead agency to be necessary and feasible to preserve in place, avoid, or minimize impacts to the resource, including but limited to, facilitating the appropriate tribal treatment of the find, as necessary. Treatment that preserves or restores the cultural character and integrity of a Tribal Cultural Resource may include Tribal monitoring, culturally appropriate recovery of cultural objects, and reburial of cultural objects or cultural soil.

Page 300 of 403 ends

75 Work at the discovery location cannot resume until all necessary investigation and evaluation of the discovery under the requirements of CEQA, including AB 523 has been satisfied.

3.19 Utilities and Service Systems
Table 3-19: Utilities and Service Systems
Would the project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction
of new or expanded water or wastewater
treatment or storm drainage, electric power,
natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
X
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and multiple dry
years?
X
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider, which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
X
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment
of solid waste reduction goals?
X
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management
and reduction statutes and regulations related to
solid waste?
X

3.19.1 Environmental Setting/Affected Environment
Wastewater:

Yuba City owns, operates, and maintains the wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal system that provides sewer service to approximately 60,000 residents and numerous businesses. The remainder of the residents and businesses in the Yuba City Sphere of Influence (SOI) are currently serviced by private septic systems. In the early 1970s, the City’s original sewage treatment plant was abandoned and the current Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) was constructed.

Water:

The water supply source for the City is surface water from the Feather River with use of a backup groundwater well. The City of Yuba City is a public water agency with approximately 18,045 connections.

City policy only allows areas within the City limits to be served by the surface water system.

Page 301 of 403 ends

76 Reuse and Recycling:

Solid waste generated in Yuba City is collected by Recology Yuba-Sutter. Recology offers residential, commercial, industrial, electronic, and hazardous waste collection, processing, recycling and disposal, as well as construction and demolition waste processing, diversion, and transfer to a disposal facility. The City’s municipal solid waste is delivered to the Ostrom Road Landfill; a State-permitted solid waste facility that provides a full range of transfer and diversion services. This landfill has a remaining capacity of 39,223,000 cubic yards (90 percent remaining capacity reported in 2007).4

3.19.2 Federal Regulatory Setting
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System: Discharge of treated wastewater to surface water(s) of the U.S., including wetlands, requires an NPDES permit. In California, the RWQCB administers the issuance of these federal permits. Obtaining a NPDES permit requires preparation of detailed information, including characterization of wastewater sources, treatment processes, and effluent quality. Any future development that exceeds one acre in size would be required to comply with NPDES criteria, including preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and the inclusion of BMPs to control erosion and offsite transport of soils.

3.19.3 State Regulatory Setting
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB): Waste Discharge Requirements Program. State regulations pertaining to the treatment, storage, processing, or disposal of solid waste are found in Title 27, CCR, Section 20005 et seq. (hereafter Title 27). In general, the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program (sometimes also referred to as the “Non-Chapter 15 (Non15) Program”) regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Exemptions from Title 27 may be granted for nine categories of discharges (e.g., sewage, wastewater, etc.) that meet, and continue to meet, the preconditions listed for each specific exemption. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to Section 20230 of Title 27. Several programs are administered under the WDR Program, including the Sanitary Sewer Order and recycled water programs.

Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle): The Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) is the State agency designated to oversee, manage, and track the 76 million tons of waste generated each year in California. CalRecycle develops laws and regulations to control and manage waste, for which enforcement authority is typically delegated to the local government. The board works jointly with local government to implement regulations and fund programs.

The Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (PRC 40050 et seq. or Assembly Bill (AB 939, codified in PRC 40000), administered by CalRecycle, requires all local and county governments to adopt a Source Reduction and Recycling Element to identify means of reducing the amount of solid waste sent to landfills.

This law set reduction targets at 25 percent by the year 1995 and 50 percent by the year 2000. To assist local jurisdictions in achieving these targets, the California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act of 1991 requires all new developments to include adequate, accessible, and convenient areas for collecting and loading recyclable and green waste materials.
4 CalRecycle, 2017. Available: http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/58-AA-0011/Detail/. Accessed August 15, 2017.

Page 302 of 403 ends

77 Regional Water Quality Control Boards: The primary responsibility for the protection of water quality in California rests with the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) and nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards. The State Board sets statewide policy for the implementation of state and federal laws and regulations. The Regional Boards adopt and implement Water Quality Control Plans (Basin Plans), which recognize regional differences in natural water quality, actual and potential beneficial uses, and water quality problems associated with human activities.

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit: As authorized by the Clean Water Act (CWA), the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Program controls water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge pollutants into water of the United States. In California, it is the responsibility of Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) to preserve and enhance the quality of the state’s waters through the development of water quality control plans and the issuance of waste discharge requirements (WDRs). WDRs for discharges to surface waters also serve as NPDES permits.

California Department of Water Resources: The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is a department within the California Resources Agency. The DWR is responsible for the State of California's management and regulation of water usage.

3.19.4 Impact Assessment/Environmental Consequences:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water or wastewater treatment or storm drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
Although this self-storage facilities will be a low water user, the Project will connect to the City’s water system. The City’s Water Treatment plant(WTP), for which its primary source of water is from the Feather River, also has adequate capacity to accommodate this project. The WTP uses two types of treatment systems, conventional and membrane treatment. The permitted capacity of the conventional WTP is 24 million gallons per day (mgd). The membrane treatment system has a permitted capacity of 12 mgd.

Water produced from the conventional and the membrane treatment plants are blended for chlorine disinfection. Operating the conventional and membrane treatment facilities provides a total WTP capacity of 36 mgd. The City is permitted to draw 30 mgd from the Feather River. The current maximum day use is 26 mgd. The City also has an on-site water well at the water plant that supplements the surface water when needed.

The City has adopted a water master plan to expand the water treatment plant to the extent that it will accommodate the overall growth of the City.

The ongoing expansion of the plant to accommodate growth beyond this project is funded by the connection fees paid by each new connection. Therefore, the impact on the water treatment facilities will be less than significant.

The Project will not connect to the City’s wastewater collection system. Since the Project is such a low water user, little wastewater will be generated. As such the Project will utilize an individual septic system.

As the system must be pre-approved by the Sutter County Environmental Health Department, the impacts from on groundwater will not be significant.

Page 303 of 403 ends

78 Stormwater drainage in this area is provided by a combination of Yuba City drainage lines and the Sutter County Water District, which operates and maintains the Live Oak Canal. This project has been determined by the respective agencies to be able to accommodate the additional drainage generated by this project. Further, the project will be responsible to pay the fees to the drainage district that mitigates the project’s impacts on the system. Thus, the impacts on the stormwater drainage system will be less than significant.

The connections to nearby electric power facilities, natural gas facilities and telecommunication facilities to this property are provided by private companies, none of which have voiced concerns over the extensions of their services to this project site. With these considerations the impact on these types of facilities are expected to be less than significant.
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
An on-site septic tank will be utilized for the Project so the City wastewater collection and treatment facilities will not be utilized.
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. e) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Recology Yuba-Sutter provides solid waste disposal for the area as well as for all of Sutter and Yuba Counties. There is adequate collection and landfill capacity to accommodate the proposed development.

3.20 Wildfire
Table 3-20: Wildfire
If located in or near state responsibility areas or
lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby
expose project occupants to pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
X
c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines
or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk
or that may result in temporary or ongoing
impacts to the environment?
X

Page 304 of 403 ends

79 d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding
or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire
slope instability, or drainage changes?
X

3.20.1 Environmental Setting/Affected Environment
Wildland fires are an annual hazard in Sutter County, particularly in the vicinity of the Sutter Buttes, and, to a lesser degree due to urbanized development, Yuba City. Wildland fires burn natural vegetation on undeveloped lands and include rangeland, brush, and grass fires. Long, hot, and dry summers with temperatures often exceeding 100°F add to the County’s fire hazard. Human activities are the major causes of wildland fires, while lightning causes the remaining wildland fires. Irrigated agricultural areas, which tend to surround Yuba City, are considered a low hazard for wildland fires.

The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection’s Fire and Resource Assessment Program identifies fire threat based on a combination of two factors: 1) fire frequency, or the likelihood of a given area burning, and 2) potential fire behavior (hazard). These two factors are combined in determining the following Fire Hazard Severity Zones: Moderate, High, Very High, Extreme. These zones apply to areas designated as State Responsibility Areas – areas in which the State has primary firefighting responsibility.

The project site is not within a State Responsibility Area and therefore has not been placed in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone.

3.20.2 Impact Assessment/ Environmental Consequences
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? As discussed in Section 3.17 of this Initial Study, project construction is not expected to substantially obstruct emergency vehicles or any evacuations that may occur in the area. Project operations likewise would not obstruct any roadways. Therefore, the impacts of the project related to emergency response or evacuations would be less than significant.
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? The project site is in a level urban area that with little, if any, native vegetation remaining, and the greater urban area is surrounded by irrigated farmland. This type of environment is generally not subject to wildfires near the urban area. In light of this, the exposure of new residents to wildfire is less than significant.
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
As discussed above, the site is not near any wildland areas and the project itself will not create any improvements that potentially could generate wildfire conditions. As such the project will not be constructing or maintaining wildfire related infrastructure such as fire breaks, emergency water sources, etc. Thus, the project will not create any potential significant impacts that could result from these types of improvements.

Page 305 of 403 ends

80 d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? The project site is in a topographically flat area. There are no streams or other channels that cross the site. As such, it is not expected that people or structures would be exposed to significant risks from changes resulting from fires in steeper areas, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides.

Impacts of the project related to these issues would be less than significant.

Page 306 of 403 ends

81 3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Table 3.21: Mandatory Findings of Significance
Would the Project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, substantially reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
example of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
X
b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects
of a project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)
X
c) Have environmental effects, which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X

3.21.1 Impact Assessment/Environmental Consequences:
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important example of the major periods of California history or prehistory? The land was stripped many years ago of native vegetation for agricultural uses and was farmed for many years. Therefore, the construction of this self-storage facility will not significantly degrade the quality of the natural environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate an important example of the major periods of California history or prehistory.

The analysis conducted in this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration results in a determination that the proposed Project, with its mitigation measures, will have a less than significant effect on the local environment.

Page 307 of 403 ends

82 b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(i) states that a Lead Agency shall consider whether the cumulative impact of a project is significant and whether the effects of the project are cumulatively considerable. The assessment of the significance of the cumulative effects of a project must, therefore, be conducted in connection with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable future projects.

This Project is consistent with the and policies of the General Plan. As such the traffic generated by the Project is within what was anticipated in the General Plan which considered anticipated future growth of the area. The City has adequate water and wastewater capacity and the project will be extending those services to the site. Stormwater drainage will also meet all City standards. The City has good development and design standards that will be applied to the project. The loss of agricultural land is cumulative but based on City and County agricultural protection program, the loss is limited to within the urban areas of the cities which is a minor portion of the entire County. The FRAQMD also did not comment that the project would create any significant cumulative impacts on air quality. Therefore, there are no significant impacts that will be individually limited but cumulatively considerable. c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
The proposed Project in and of itself would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Construction-related air quality, noise, and hazardous materials exposure impacts would occur for a very short period and only be a minor impact during that time period. Therefore, the proposed project would not have any direct or indirect significant adverse impacts on humans.

Page 308 of 403 ends

83 4. Section References and/or Incorporated by Reference According to Section 15150 of the CEQA Guidelines, an ND may incorporate by reference all or portions of another document that is a matter of public record. The incorporated language will be considered to be set forth in full as part of the text of the ND. All documents incorporated by reference are available for review at, or can be obtained through, the City of Yuba City Development Services Department located at the address provided above. The following documents are incorporated by reference:

Fehr & Peers, Inc. September 2020. SB 743 Implementation Guidelines for City of Yuba City.

Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, November 2017. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA.

Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Hex Maps. Work VMT-2020 MTP/SCS (Adopted).

California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection (CDC DLRP). 2014. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program – Sutter County Important Farmland 2012. August 2014.

California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection (CDC DLRP). 2013. Sutter County Williamson Act FY 2013/2014.

Carollo. 2011. City of Yuba City 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2011.

Yuba City, City of. 2016. City of Yuba City Municipal Code. https://www.municode.com/library/ca/yuba_city/codes/code_of_ordinances Dyett & Bhatia. 2004. City of Yuba City General Plan. Adopted April 8, 2004.

Yuba City General Plan, 2004 Environmental Impact Report. (SCH #2001072105).

Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. 1995. Yuba-Sutter Bikeway Master Plan. December 1995. “Determination of 1-in-200 Year Floodplain for Yuba City Urban Level of Flood Protection Determination,” prepared for Yuba City by MBK Engineers, November 2015.

Sutter County General Plan.

Feather River Air Quality Management District (FRAQMD) CEQA Significance Thresholds.

Yuba Sutter Transit Route Map.

California Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey. “Fault Zone Activity Map.” AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zones.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2016. EnviroStor. Available at http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/

Page 309 of 403 ends

84 California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program – Sutter County Important Farmland Map.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Flood Insurance Rate Maps.

Carollo. 2011. City of Yuba City 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2011.

City of Yuba City Wastewater Master Plan.

Sutter County Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan, April, 1994.

Yuba County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, Sept., 2010.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2011. California Scenic Highway Mapping System website. Updated September 7, 2011. Available at
http://dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/index.htm

Page 310 of 403 ends

1 City of Yuba City

MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING PLAN
Yuba City Self-Storage:

Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration EA 22-03 For Development Plan 22-01
Impact Mitigation Measure Responsible Party Timing

3.7 Geology and Soils Paleontological Mitigation Measure 1: This Mitigation Measure shall be placed as a note on the Demolition and Grading Plans. If paleontological resources are found, the construction manager shall halt all activity and immediately contact the Development Services Department at 530-822-4700.

Mitigation shall be conducted as follows:

1. Identify and evaluate paleontological resources by intense field survey where impacts are considered high;

2. Assess effects on identified sites;

3. Consult with the institutional/academic paleontologists conducting research investigations within the geological formations that are slated to be impacted;

4. Obtain comments from the researchers;

5. Comply with researchers’ recommendations to address any significant adverse effects where determined by the City to be feasible.

In considering any suggested mitigation proposed by the consulting paleontologist, the City’s Community Development Department Staff shall determine whether avoidance is necessary and feasible in light of factors such as the nature of the find, project design, costs, Specific or General Plan policies and land use assumptions, and other considerations. If avoidance is unnecessary or infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) shall be instituted.

Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for paleontological resources is carried out.

Developer, Public
Works Dept.,
Development
Services Dept.

During
construction
phase

3.8. Greenhouse Gases Greenhouse Gas Mitigation 1: The site grading and construction of the selfstorage facility shall comply with the GHG Reduction Measures provided in the adopted Yuba City Resource Efficiency Plan.

Development
Services Dept.

Prior to
issuance of
building

Page 311 of 403 ends

2 permits.

3.18. Tribal Cultural
Resources
Tribal Cultural Resources Mitigation 1: Post Ground Disturbance A minimum of seven days prior to beginning earthwork, clearing, and grubbing, or other soil disturbing activities, the applicant shall notify lead agency of the proposed earthwork start-date. The lead agency shall contact the United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC) with the proposed earthwork start-date and a UAIC Tribal Representative or Tribal Monitor shall be invited to inspect the project site, including any soil piles, trenches, or other disturbed areas, within the first five days of groundbreaking activity, or as appropriate for the type and size of the project. During this inspection, a UAIC Tribal Representative or Tribal Monitor may provide an on-site meeting for construction personnel information on TCRs and workers awareness brochure.

If any TCRs are encountered during this initial inspection, or during any subsequent construction activities, work shall be suspended within 100 feet of the find and measures included in the Unanticipated Discoveries Mitigation Measure 2 shall be implemented. Preservation in place is the preferred alternative under CEQA and UAIC protocols, and every effort must be made to preserve the resources in place, including through project redesign.

The contractor shall implement any measures deemed by CEQA lead agency to be necessary and feasible to preserve in place, avoid, or minimize significant effects to the resources, including the use of paid Native American Monitor during ground disturbing activities.

Tribal Cultural Resources Mitigation 2: Unanticipated Discoveries: If any suspected TCRs are discovered during ground disturbing construction activities, all work shall cease within 100 feet of the find, or an agreed upon distance based on the project area and nature of the find. A Tribal Representative from a California Native American Tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with a geographic area shall be immediately notified and shall determine if the find is a TCR (PRC 21074). The Tribal Representative will make recommendations for further evaluation and treatment as necessary.

Preservation in place is the preferred alternative under CEQA and UAIC Developer, Public
Works Dept.,
Development
Services Dept.

During
construction
phase

Page 312 of 403 ends

3 protocols, and every effort must be made to preserve the resources in place, including through project redesign. Culturally appropriate treatment may be, but is not limited to, processing materials for reburial, minimizing handling of cultural objects, leaving objects in place within the landscape, returning objects to a location within the project area where they will not be subject to future impacts. The Tribe does not consider curation of TCR’s to be appropriate or respectful and request that materials not be permanently curated, unless approved by the Tribe.

The contractor shall implement any measures deemed by the CEQA lead agency to be necessary and feasible to preserve in place, avoid, or minimize impacts to the resource, including but limited to, facilitating the appropriate tribal treatment of the find, as necessary. Treatment that preserves or restores the cultural character and integrity of a Tribal Cultural Resource may include Tribal monitoring, culturally appropriate recovery of cultural objects, and reburial of cultural objects or cultural soil.

Work at the discovery location cannot resume until all necessary investigation and evaluation of the discovery under the requirements of CEQA, including AB 523 has been satisfied.

Page 313 of 403 ends

Agenda Item 17

CITY OF YUBA CITY

STAFF REPORT
Date: August 16, 2022
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Public Works Department
Presentation By: Joshua Wolffe, Associate Engineer
Summary
Subject: Yuba City Residential Street Light Maintenance Districts (Walton Area and Tierra Buena Area) Levying Assessments
Recommendation: A. Conduct a Public Hearing
B. Adopt a Resolution confirming and ordering the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23 within Yuba City Residential Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Tierra Buena) and Residential Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Walton Area)
Fiscal Impact: Walton District – no change in assessments Tierra Buena District – no change in assessments
Purpose:

To provide ongoing residential street lighting to assessed districts in the City, pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

Council Strategic Goal:

Levying Yuba City Residential Street Light Maintenance Districts (RSLMDs) addresses the City Council’s Strategic Goal of maintaining infrastructure, as the levy of the RSLMDs will ensure that street lighting remains operational.

Background:

The City annually levies and collects special assessments in order to maintain and service streetlights in the Walton Avenue Area and Tierra Buena Area (Attachment 1, Exhibit A). The Districts were formed while the areas were under the County’s jurisdiction, and the City took over the administration of the Districts when they were annexed into the City. Prior to 2009, the Districts were historically charged the maximum levy which allowed the reserves to build up.

On July 5, 2022, Council adopted Resolutions directing the filing of the Annual Reports. On July 19, 2022, Council adopted Resolutions of Intention to order the improvements, and set a Public Hearing for August 16, 2022 to establish the assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

Page 314 of 403 ends

Analysis:

The Engineer’s Annual Reports have been prepared and are on file in the City Clerk’s Office. They describe each District, the improvements therein, the method of assessment, and the proposed assessment for each parcel.

Fiscal Impact:

Annual levies will remain unchanged for both Districts. The proposed levy amounts for each District are shown in Attachment 2.

The projected revenue, expenditures, and cash balance for the Districts are as follows:

District Revenue Expenditures Projected Reserve Fund Balance as of 7/1/22
Tierra Buena Area $22,411 $26,956 $111,066
Walton Area $81,677 $76,722 ($26,944)
Operating costs for the Walton area have neared or exceeded the maximum levy for the district multiple times over the past ten years. Additionally, operating costs for Walton have increased while operating costs for Tierra Buena have decreased after FY 2015-16.

Alternatives:

1. Council may direct the modification of the assessment amounts which will affect future revenue and expenditure amounts in Fiscal Year 2022-23, or cancel the District and find alternative funding sources to operate the streetlights.

2. Council may direct City staff to follow legal procedures in order to modify the Residential Street Light Maintenance Districts to include Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) provisions.

Attachments:

1. Attachment 1 - Resolution RSLMD Public Hearing

2. Exhibit A - District Maps

3. Attachment 2 - Proposed Assessments RSLMD Public Hearing Prepared By: Submitted By:

Josh Wolffe
Associate Civil Engineer
Diana Langley
City Manager

Page 315 of 403 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 316 of 403 ends

RESOLUTION NO. _________

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUBA CITY

CONFIRMING AND ORDERING THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 WITHIN YUBA CITY RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE

DISTRICT (WALTON AREA) AND YUBA CITY RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHT

MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (TIERRA BUENA AREA) PURSUANT TO THE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Yuba City previously formed Yuba City Residential Street Light Maintenance District (Walton Area) and Yuba City Residential Street Light Maintenance District (Tierra Buena Area) (“Districts”), pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, California Government Code Division 2, Chapter 6.6, Section 54703 et seq. (hereafter referred to as the “Act”); and
WHEREAS, a Report (hereafter referred to as the “Formation Report”) was prepared, filed and approved by the City Council in connection with each of the Districts and the levy of said assessments, pursuant to Section 54716 of said Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted property owner protest proceedings relating to the improvements and services described in the Formation Report and the levy and collection of annual assessments and an assessment range formula related thereto for each of the Districts in accordance with the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID and Proposition 218; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, after the first year’s levy of assessments, the City Council may annually thereafter determine the cost of the services to be financed by the assessments and by ordinance or resolution determine and impose the assessments as approved by the property owners in conjunction with formation of the Districts; and WHEREAS, the Council directed and authorized the City Engineer to assist with the calculation and establishment of the assessments and to prepare and file a budget report(s) (hereafter referred to as the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk, generally describing how the Districts were formed, the improvements and services within the Districts, the method of apportionment and dispensation of the benefits, and the budget containing the costs and proposed levy amounts for funding the benefits and the assessment roll; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer’s Reports outlining the proposed expenses and annual assessments for the Districts have been prepared and presented to the City Council for review and filed with the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to impose the annual assessment for each District at an amount not to exceed the maximum amount previously approved by the voters; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after notice duly given as required by law, held a public hearing on August 16, 2022 at 6:00 p.m., in the City Hall council chambers to consider the proposed annual levy of assessments for each of the Districts; and,

Page 317 of 403 ends

WHEREAS, on August 16, 2022, all interested persons were afforded the opportunity to comment in protest or support of the assessments; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Report, which serves as the budget report, as presented and is satisfied that the assessments have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed within the Districts therein; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to levy the annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2022-23 for the Districts.

NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Yuba City as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

2. The City Council hereby (1) finds that the public interest and convenience requires, and (2) declares its intention, to order the levy of and to collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of property within existing assessment districts designated Yuba City Residential Street Light Maintenance District (Walton Area) and Yuba City Residential Street Light Maintenance District (Tierra Buena Area) (“Districts”), pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023, to pay for the costs and expenses of the improvements described below in Section 4 of this Resolution.

3. The boundaries of the Districts are generally located and depicted in “Exhibit A” attached hereto.

4. The proposed improvements are briefly described as follows: the operation of residential street lights.

5. The assessments to be levied and collected against the assessable lots and parcels of property within each District for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are proposed to remain the same as compared to the assessments levied and collected for Fiscal Year 2021-22.

6. The City Council has reviewed the Engineer’s Report, which serves as the budget report, in connection with each of the Districts and the levy and collection of assessments proposed for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Based upon its review of the Budget Report, the City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The territory of land within each of the Districts will receive special benefits from the operation, maintenance and servicing of the street light system and the appurtenant improvements and facilities related thereto within that District; and,
b. The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within each of the Districts, in accordance with the proposed Engineer’s Report (commencing July 1,

Page 318 of 403 ends

2022 and ending June 30, 2023) shall be apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among the eligible parcels within that District in proportion to the special benefits to be received by each parcel from the improvements and services as defined in the original Engineer’s Report first prepared and filed pursuant to Section 54716 of Act, and is satisfied that the assessments are levied without regard to property valuation.

7. The budget and assessments for each of the Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-23 as presented to the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby confirmed as filed.

8. The Council finds that the hearing on said annual levy of assessment for the Districts was held in accordance with law and all persons desiring to speak were heard.

9. The Engineer’s Report, the diagram for the assessment district and the assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements contained therewith and each and every part of said Report, is adopted and approved for each District, and that the assessment of the total amount of the costs and the individual assessments thereof upon the several subdivisions of lane expenses, respectively, from said improvements, and of the expenses incidental thereto, be and the same hereby is finally approved and confirmed as the assessment to pay the costs. The assessment for Fiscal Year 2022-23 is proposed to remain the same as the previous year as described in the Engineer’s Report.

10. The Council hereby orders the levy of the assessments described in said Resolution of Intention and the Engineer’s Report for each District. As the levies are consistent with the amounts approved with the formation of each District and remain the same, the assessment is exempted from the requirements of Article XIII Section D of the California Constitution (Proposition 218).

11. The City Council hereby orders the Districts improvements as indicated in the Engineer’s Report, to be made and authorizes and directs the City Clerk or designee to file the levy with the County Auditor/Controller for Fiscal Year 2022-

23. 12. The County Auditor/Controller of Sutter shall enter on the County Tax Roll opposite each identified parcel of land the amount of the levy, and such levies shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the levy shall be paid to the City Treasurer.

13. The adoption of this Resolution constitutes the levy of the annual assessment for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023 for the Districts.

Page 319 of 403 ends

The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Yuba City at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of August, 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Dave Shaw, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ciara Wakefield, Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM

COUNSEL FOR YUBA CITY
Shannon L. Chaffin, City Attorney
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
Attachment(s):

Exhibit A – District Maps

Page 320 of 403 ends

EXHIBIT A

Page 321 of 403 ends

CHERRY ST

RICHLAND RD

BOGUE RD

HUNN RD

LINCOLN RD

TANGLEWOOD DR

SMITH RD

JODI DR

LEONARD CT

S WALTON AVE

THOMAS CT
ELI CT

ANTHONY WAY

C AMINOCORTEZ

ARDEN AV
OLIVER
E
DR

AUGUSTA LN

PEBBLE BEACH DR

RANCHO WAY

MARINA DR

CREST CT

HOLLY TREE DR

FALLSDR

ELIZABETH CT SHAYLENE CT

BARRINGTON DR
IDA CT

ANITA WAY

NAND CT

MA SERA CT

CREST DR
CORTEZ
CT

EL SE RENOCT

W JOSEPH ST

RICHARDS WAY

ANNA DR

PELICAN PL

ERIC CT

MELINDA CT

KRISTIN CT

PORTOLA

VALLEY RD

CRISP DR

DH LI LON DR

BRIAN DR

NAND DR

GLENWAY

NELDA CT

COUNTRYSIDE DR

PARKWOOD DR

DEAN DR

MANZANITA WAY

MC CUNE AVE

MARJOR EI DR

INDER LN

JOSEPHENE WAY

S WALTON AVE

ST ANDREWS DR

PATRICIA DR
BAY DR

TRACY DR

RAMERIZ DR

GREGORY DR

BUCHANNAN
RD

CREST DR

SPYGLASS DR

SUNRISE CT

SEQUOIA DR

INDER LN

S WALTON AVE

CAMINO DEL ORO

THOMAS DR

FRAN CT DERAE CT

ESTATES DR

RUSHING ST

SHEENA CT

BURGANDY DR

R DI GE WAY

WOODLE A F DR

ST JOHN CT

MARTIN CT

MASERA WAY

BROMLEY AVE

PETTY CT

S HARD NI G RD

CEDAR WAY

JORDAN RD

CAMINO DE FLORES

MICHELLE DR
ASH CT

PARKWOOD CT

EDWIN DR

SESSLER PL

TRIFF WAY
INEZCT

PALORA AVE

SOFIADR

MEADOW AVE

VIA J AC NI TO

ST FRANCIS WAY

STOKER AVE

MC CUNE AVE

LOUIS CT

EVERGREEN WAY

TORRY P NI E DR

KRENTZ LN

NICOLAS DR

SHAKEWOOD DR

LA RABYN WAY

MORGAN WAY

S WALTON AVE

AARON DR

DONALD CT

CLINT WAY
RAJ CT

EDWIN DR

H OLLY AVE

HOLCOMB RD

GROVE RD

HARBOR TOWN DR
W

OODR DI GE CT
MEADOW
AVE

LA RAMADA

HAZEL AVE

MICHELLE DR

SEAGULL DR

VERNON AVE

BANCROFT AVE

LITTLE JOHN RD

BUCHANNAN RD

CAMINO DE FLORES

GERMA NI E DR GERMA NI E DR

BERKSHIRE DR
ALLEN
WAY

JOHNATHAN DR

EDWIN DR

THERESAWAY

SESSLER DR

SESSLER DR

EDW NI DR

SANBORN RD

ELLIOT DR

CRESWELL DR

SANDPIPER DR

MESA VERDE

JOSEPHST

JOSEPHST

DI A WAY

TUSCANY DR

AL CI AI DR

RAI ESTATES CT

YOLANDA DR

OHLEYER RD

S HARD NI G RD

YOLANDA DR

G DI DA LOOP

JODI DR
HWY 99 SB
HWY 99 SB HWY 99 NB
BAY CT

AUTUMNWOOD DR

ALYSSA DR

CREEKWOOD DR

SEQUOIADR

JACOB DR

ONSTOTT FRTG RD

GREEN V ALLEY RD
8 Yuba City Residential Street Light Maintenance District Walton Area

Page 322 of 403 ends

BUTTE HOUSE RD

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

KIM WAY

JEFFERSON AVE

HOOPER RD

AMERICANA DR

SERENA CT

YORKTOWN DR

ROMERO ST

TEAL HOLLOW DR

NORTHCROSS ST

VALENCIA ST

PERALTA ST

ZAMORA ST

CLEARV EI W DR

TORI CT

RUTH AVE

MONROE DR

BOBBY LN

VIA ROMA WAY

JORI CT

KYLIE CT

SARAH CT

DAVE PL

LIBBY LN

ROYO RANCHERO RD

COLUSA FRONTAGE RD

JOHN PL

PARIS WAY

LORRIE WAY

ROOSEVELT RD

ROYO RANCHERO RD

SER ENA
MAR

DR COS CT

TRUE RD

CARMELITA DR

EMMA CT

CYNDA LN

QUAIL POINTE DR

SIERRA VISTA DR

LORETTA CT

VOGT CT

COUGHLIN CT

BRYAN WAY

LA MANTIA DR

MARBLE CT

INDEPENDENCE DR

VAN VLECK ST

PEBBLE CT
VI CT
RUE DR

MONROE DR

VINE AVE

KIRA CT

YORKTOWN DR

TEJA DR

DONA WAY

SAN GIMIGNANO DR

TOMBI WAY

MCKINLEY RD

CAROLE GI H WAY

LONG ST

YOR KTOWN DR

M LI LER RD

FRUITRIDGE RD

STONEY DR

COLUSA FRONTAGE RD

BECKY LN

LYNCHBURG DR

MELBA ST

YORKTOWN DR

V LI LA AVE

W LI LIAMSBURG DR

EL MARGARITA RD

MONROE RD
HWY 20 EB HWY 20 WB

MONROE RD

ADAMS RD

V LI LA AVE

EL MARGAR TI A RD

TULIO ST

REDDING AVE
COY DR
COY DR

KENNEDY DR

TORI LN

BRYN MAWR DR

PEPPERWOOD DR

GRANITE DR

MAD SI ON RD

WESTERN PKWY

BUENA V SI TA DR

TIERRA BUENA RD TIERRA BUENA RD

STONEGAT E DR
ART
DR

ELMER AVE

DELLE DR

KIMBERLY
DR

ORO GRANDE ST

YOUNG RD

YOUNG RD

REDDING AVE
8 Yuba City Residential Street Light Maintenance District Tierra Buena Area

Page 323 of 403 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 324 of 403 ends

PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS

WALTON RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHT DISTRICT
Affected Subdivision Proposed
Assessment
(per single unit - $)
Change From
Previous Year ($)
Maximum Levy
Allowed ($)
Bogue Ranch $37.00 $0.00 $37.00
Bogue Ranch II $59.40 $0.00 $59.40
Cypress $41.74 $0.00 $41.74
Hampton Estates I $45.58 $0.00 $45.58
Hampton Estates II $41.80 $0.00 $41.80
Kushlia Village $62.00 $0.00 $62.00
Lincoln Park II $52.56 $0.00 $52.56
Lincoln Pointe $51.48 $0.00 $51.48
Lincoln Village I $61.44 $0.00 $61.44
Lincoln Village II $50.78 $0.00 $50.78
Meadowood I $73.12 $0.00 $73.12
Meadowood II $111.88 $0.00 $111.88
Orchard II $62.92 $0.00 $62.92
Orchard III $34.60 $0.00 $34.60
Ravenwood I $54.06 $0.00 $54.06
Ravenwood II $67.28 $0.00 $67.28
Ravenwood III $40.40 $0.00 $40.40
Sanborn Estates $63.58 $0.00 $63.58
Sandpiper I, II, III $46.32 $0.00 $46.32
Sun Valley II $51.48 $0.00 $51.48
Sunrise Village $58.56 $0.00 $58.56
W Ranch
Meadowood
$67.06 $0.00 $67.06
Walton Park Estates $38.00 $0.00 $38.00
Walton Ranch $60.06 $0.00 $60.06
Woodside Village II $67.56 $0.00 $67.56

Page 325 of 403 ends

TIERRA BUENA RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHT DISTRICT
Affected Subdivision Proposed
Assessment
(per single unit)
Change From
Previous Year
Maximum Levy
Allowed
Bryn Mawr Estates III $25.38 $0.00 $61.22
Bryn Mawr Estates IV $27.16 $0.00 $65.52
Buena Vista I $14.94 $0.00 $36.04
Buena Vista II $34.78 $0.00 $83.90
Butte Rancho $27.93 $0.00 $67.38
Butte View Estates $36.94 $0.00 $89.10
Country Aire $32.22 $0.00 $77.72
Kira Estates $33.20 $0.00 $80.08
Loma Vista $34.14 $0.00 $82.36
Quail Pointe Estates $37.10 $0.00 $89.50
Ranchero II & III $45.15 $0.00 $108.90
Ranchero IV & VI $20.13 $0.00 $48.54
Ranchero Estates I $26.72 $0.00 $64.46
Ranchero Estates V $24.90 $0.00 $60.06
Rancho De Royo I Ph I $52.42 $0.00 $126.44
Rancho De Royo II Ph II $27.18 $0.00 $65.56
Skyview Place $33.95 $0.00 $81.90
Stonegate Village Unit I $24.59 $0.00 $59.32
Stonegate Village Unit II $21.52 $0.00 $51.90
Stonegate Village Unit III $17.24 $0.00 $41.58
Suburban Acres $20.31 $0.00 $49.00
Tara Estates $21.09 $0.00 $50.86
Teja IV $29.73 $0.00 $71.72
Walnut Acres $21.69 $0.00 $52.32

Page 326 of 403 ends

Agenda Item 18

CITY OF YUBA CITY

STAFF REPORT
Date: August 16, 2022
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Public Works Department
Presentation By: Joshua Wolffe, Associate Engineer
Summary
Subject: Yuba City Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (Stabler Lane/Garden Highway Area) Levying Assessments
Recommendation: A. Conduct a Public Hearing
B. Adopt a Resolution confirming and ordering the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 Fiscal Impact: Receipt of assessments and expenditures of funds for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Purpose:

To continue to provide Landscape Maintenance throughout the City pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

Council Strategic Goal:

Levying Yuba City Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LLMD No. 1) addresses the City Council’s Strategic Goal of maintaining infrastructure, as levying (LLMD No. 1) will ensure that landscaping and associated items are maintained and in operation.

Background:

The City annually levies and collects a special assessment in order to maintain and service landscaping that provides special benefit to the parcels identified in Landscape Maintenance District 1 (Attachment 1, Exhibit A). The assessments were approved by the property owners of record through a protest ballot proceeding at the time the District was formed.

District 1 includes the Stabler Lane area (A) and Garden Highway area (B, B_1, and B_2). Zones A and B do not have provisions for a cost of living adjustment (COLA) and have historically been charged the maximum levy allowed in order to cover the expenses. Zones B_1 and B_2 are recently formed zones of benefit and do have provisions for a COLA which is based on the Consumer Price Index from January to January.

In previous years, the expenditures in District No. 1 exceeded the revenue due to increasing costs and

Page 327 of 403 ends

the lack of COLA provisions, creating negative Reserve Fund Balances.

The City has addressed these negative fund balances with aggressive cost-cutting measures and transfers from the General Fund and Streets and Road Fund. The City has reduced professional services, water, and administration expenses, allowing the revenue to exceed the expenditures in District No. 1.

The City previously attempted to modify District No. 1 to include the COLA provisions, but residents within the District opposed the modification. Without the ability to increase rates, the cost to maintain the district has exceeded revenues received from the assessments. In order to restore maintenance levels, the City could again approach property owners about approving an assessment increase through a Proposition 218 process.

On July 5, 2022, Council adopted a Resolution describing improvements and directing the filing of the Annual Report. On July 19, 2022, Council adopted a Resolution approving the Engineer’s Report, and a Resolution of Intention to order the improvements, setting a Public Hearing for August 16, 2022 to establish the assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

Analysis:

The Engineer’s Annual Report has been prepared and is on file in the City Clerk’s office. The report describes the District, the improvements therein, the method of assessment, and the proposed assessment for each parcel.

Fiscal Impact:

The proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are shown in Attachment 2.

The projected revenue, expenditures, and cash balance, which include capital reserve, for the Districts are as follows:

District – Zone of
Benefit Revenue Expenditures Projected Reserve Fund Balanceas of 7/1/23* 1 - A $22,007 $19,674 $2,975
1 – B** $66,250 $64,988 $29,778
*The Projected Reserve Fund Balance is the total of the Capital Replacement Reserve plus the Operating Reserve.
**Dollar amounts for both Zones of Benefit B, B_1, and B_2 are included within “1-B” row of table.

The reserve balance in Zone of Benefit B consists of General Fund transfers that were unspent from previous years. Staff recommends maintaining this reserve balance to cover unforeseen expenses that may come up throughout the year. Moving forward, the City may be required to reduce maintenance levels in District No. 1, or utilize General Fund Gateway Maintenance Transfer funds to maintain previous years’ level of maintenance.

Alternatives:

1. Council may direct the modification of the assessment amounts which will affect future revenue and expenditure amounts in FY 22/23, or cancel the District and find alternative funding sources to maintain the landscaping.

2. Council may direct City staff to follow legal procedures in order to modify District No. 1 to include an adjustment to match current expenditures with COLA provisions to avoid revenue shortfalls in the future.

Page 328 of 403 ends

3. Council may direct other fund sources to supplement the District revenues based on previous Fiscal Year expenditures. In previous fiscal years, the average expenditure dollar amount in Zone of Benefit B was approximately $100,000 with revenues being approximately $65,000.

Attachments:

1. Attachment 1- Resolution LLMD No. 1 Public Hearing

2. Exhibit A - District Maps

3. Attachment 2 - Proposed Assessments D1 Public Hearing Prepared By: Submitted By:

Josh Wolffe
Associate Civil Engineer
Diana Langley
City Manager

Page 329 of 403 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 330 of 403 ends

RESOLUTION NO. _________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUBA CITY CONFIRMING AND ORDERING THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 FOR THE YUBA CITY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ZONE OF BENEFIT “A” (STABLER LANE AREA) AND ZONES OF BENEFIT “B,” “B_1,” & “B_2” (GARDEN

HIGHWAY AREA))
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2022, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500) (the “Act”), the City Council of the City of Yuba City did declare its intention to review, levy and collect the annual assessment for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (“District”) for Fiscal Year 2022-23; and
WHEREAS, assessments levied within the District provided revenue for the purpose of financing the installation, construction, and maintenance of certain public projects eligible under the Act, including without limitation the operation, maintenance, and servicing of improvements including turf, ground cover, shrubs, trees, plants, irrigation and drainage systems, ornamental lighting structures, street lighting, masonry walls or other fencing, entryway monuments, and associated appurtenant facilities located within the streetscape (perimeter landscaping) surrounding the developments, as well as servicing improvements including electricity, water for irrigation of any landscaping, and the operation of fountains; and
WHEREAS, said Council did declare its intention to levy and collect the annual assessment for the maintenance and operation of the landscaping facilities in said District; and WHEREAS, on July 5, 2022, pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the City Council initiated proceedings by Resolution No. 22-102 for the levy and collection of assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land in the District for Fiscal Year 2022-23 and directed the Engineer of Work, Tyrone Peter of Willdan Financial Services, to prepare and file a written report in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the Act; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Act, the Engineer of Work prepared and filed such report (the “Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk, and the City Clerk has presented the Engineer’s Report to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-111 approving the Engineer’s Report, which calculated the annual assessments for the parcels in said District, as filed pursuant to Section 22623 of the Act, and
WHEREAS, the public notice of the Resolution of Intention and the Public Hearing scheduled for August 16, 2022, was duly published on August 5, 2022.

NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Yuba City as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

2. The City Council hereby (1) finds that the public interest and convenience requires and (2) declares its intention to order the levy of and to collect assessments against

Page 331 of 403 ends

the assessable lots and parcels of property within an existing assessment district designated “Landscape Maintenance District No. 1” (the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023, to pay for the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the Engineer’s Report.

3. That the City Council hereby determines that the territory within the District, whose boundaries are set forth in the Engineer’s Report, on file with the City Clerk of the City of Yuba City, will be the territory benefited by the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in said Report.

4. That the hearing on said annual levy of assessment was held in accordance with law and all persons desiring to speak were heard.

5. That the Engineer’s Report, the diagram for the assessment district and the assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements contained therewith and each and every part of said Report, is adopted and approved as to the District, and that the assessment of the total amount of the costs and the individual assessments thereof, respectively, from said improvements, and of the expenses incidental thereto, be and the same hereby are finally approved and confirmed as the assessments to pay the costs. The assessments for District No. 1, Zones of Benefit “A” and “B,” for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are proposed to remain the same as the previous year as described in the Engineer’s Report. The assessments for District No. 1, Zone of Benefit “B_1,” and “B_2” for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are proposed to increase from the previous year as described in the Engineer’s Report, but are still within or less than the amount approved for Zones of Benefit “B_1” and “B_2” at the time of the Districts’ formations.

6. The Council hereby orders the levy of the assessments described in said Resolution of Intention and the Engineer’s Report.

7. That the assessment diagram showing the assessment district referred to in said Resolution of Intention, and also the subdivision of land within the District, as contained in said Engineer’s Report, be and it is hereby finally approved and confirmed as the diagram of the properties to be assessed to pay the costs of the improvements.

8. The City Clerk shall file the diagram and assessment, as confirmed or certified copy thereof, with the Sutter County Auditor-Controller no later than August 19, 2022.

9. As the levies remain the same as prior years, the assessments for District No. 1 Zones of Benefit “A” and “B” are exempted from the requirements of Article XIII Section “D” of the California Constitution (Proposition 218). Likewise, although the levies have increased for District No. 1 Zones of Benefit “B_1” and “B_2” as compared to the prior year, the levy amounts are consistent with and less than the previously approved Cost of Living Adjustment adopted at the times of formation of the Districts pursuant to Proposition 218, and as such, the levies for District No. 1 Zones of Benefit “B_1” and “B_2” are likewise exempt from further compliance with Proposition 218.

Page 332 of 403 ends

The foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Yuba City at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of August 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Dave Shaw, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ciara Wakefield, Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM

COUNSEL FOR YUBA CITY
Shannon L. Chaffin, City Attorney
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
Attachment(s):

Exhibit A – District Map

Page 333 of 403 ends

EXHIBIT A

Page 334 of 403 ends

QUEENS AVE

FLORAIN DR

GA RD ENS ID E WAY

DOROTHY LN

BUTTE VISTA LN

SARATOGA CT

SPRIG CT

HAWK CT

MYKONOS CT

STABLER PARK DR

OAKBROOK CT

ROBIN CT

TUMBER WAY

MONTCLAIR DR

EL VERANO WAY

PORTOFINO DR

ELVERANDACT

JAMIE DR

ELSOBRANTECT

TRES PICOS DR

SANTA BARBARA WAY

MANCHESTER WAY

LANCASTER WAY

OSPREY CT

VINTAGE CT

PINTAIL CT

SANTORINI CT

CORSICA DR

TORTOSA CT

DOVE CT

ELDORADOLN

QUAIL CT

RACHEL CT

NORTHF ELD CT I

SYLVIA WAY

OAKBROOK DR
QUEENS AVE SB 99 ON
HWY 99

MALAGA CT

LORA WAY
99 NB QUEENS AVE OFF

DEBBIE LN

ESPLANADE WAY

BR SI TOL CT

ELIZABETH LN

EDEN WAY

PHEASANT DR

SEVILLA CT

JENNIFER LN

DANA WAY

PEACH TREE LN

EMILY LN

PATTY DR

GROUSE WAY

BR ADLEY ESTATES DR

NADEAN DR

LA PALMA

EL CERRITO CT

JENNIFER CT

YORK DR

NANCY CT

LA CRESENTA CT

RICH LN

MICHAEL WAY

PROVENCE DR

VALLEY VIEW DR

BROOKFIELD CT CUMMINGS CT

MALTA DR

COLIN CT

CHRISTIFER LN

CANDACE CT

KENDALL CT
BAL CT

DIJON CT

MC MULLEN AVE

KENNY DR

SHAY WAY

CASA LOMA WAY

CASITA DR

LA COLINA LN

MELTON DR

LORRAINE WAY

MICH CT

NORTHWOODS DR

FORESTWOOD DR

CLAIRE CT

WOODLAND DR

NORTH RIDGE DR

CAMDEN WAY

NORTHGATEDR

WARD CT

CLYDE WAY

ROLLING ROCK CT

GENOA CT

CHLOE CT

CALAIS DR

TURIN DR

MEHAR CT

RAVI CT

SUKH DR

PABLA CT

VALLEY CT

COATS DR

GRANADA WAY

PARC EAST DR

BUTTE BEND LN

PAULA DR

HUNTER WAY
PAM DR

SPENCER LN

SHARON DR

REBECCA DR
99 SB QUEENS AVE OFF
QUEENS AVE 99 NB ON

STABLER LN

MESSINA DR

E ONSTOTT FRTG RD

CARTAGENA DR

PARC WEST DR

MESSINA CT

REGENCY WAY

CAPRI DR

GR EENWOOD WAY

MANN DR

SOMERSET WAY

NORTHFIELD DR

HERBERT CT

W ONSTOTT FRTG RD

MAJORCA DR

MEADOWLARK WAY
1A
Lighting & Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1
Zones of Benefit

QUEENS AVE

S WALTON AVE

THARPRD

BUTTE HOUSE RD

FRANKLIN AVE

SUNSWEET BLVD

PLUMAS ST

RICHLAND RD

LINCOLN RD

HARTER PKWY

HOOPER RD

STEWART RD

L VI E OAKBLVD

RAILROAD AVE

BRIDGE ST

S GEORGE WASH NI GTON BLVD

LINCOLN RD

FRANKLIN RD

BOGUE RD

BUNCE RD

OHLEYER RD

TIERRA BUENA RD

GRAY AVE

CLARK AVE

GARDEN HWY
Highway 20
Highway 99
8 Legend
Maintenance Districts μ City Limits

Page 335 of 403 ends

1B
1B
1B_1
1B_1
1B_2

BUNCE RD

GARDEN HWY

JONES RD

S BARRETT RD

RAILROAD AVE

RANDOLPH DR

LINCOLN RD

BOGUE RD

RICHLAND RD

WINSHIP RD

CRESTMONT AVE

SINGH'S WAY

WHISTLEW OO D CT

B RENTW OOD DR

KILLINGTON CT

CORNWELL AVE

M E A DO W A V E

WALLACE DR

MILL CREEK WAY

TEESDALE RD

GR OV E CT

GOLD RIVER DR

HASTINGS WAY

ALMOND GROVE DR

STONYB ROOK DR

MARINER LOOP

SHANGHAI BEND RD

DEL LAGO

CAR ISSA C T

MAIN ST

MA RG AR ET C T

PAYNECT

SOUTHLAND DR

ASH WO OD CT

PH LI LIPS RD

W NI S H PI C T

ALDE RWO O D C T

TA RA CT

JILL CT

STEWART RD

JAN C T

ATLANT IC CT

WILD RIVER DR

EUREKA DR

S TO NYB RO OK CT

CR ESWE LLD R

DORCAS CT

MAGNOLIA DR

SOUTH PARK DR LA GRANDE AVE

RIVER OAKS DR
REO DR

MILLFRONT AVE

MARINER W AY

VILLAGE CT

BLA CK CT

BUCK RIVERTS

WAVERLY CT

DEE BEERSCT

COLONY CT

HAVE N CT

TRINITY AVE

SM ITH RD

CAMBRIDG ECT

DIAMOND POINTE WAY

WINDSOR DR

TULSA C T

BU RL CT

MARIPOSA DR

WOODHAVEN DR

ROCKY CT

KATHERINE CT

RHINE CT

WIND RIVE R CT

GEE BEE WAY

ALBATROSS AVE

SO UTHWIND DR

COLD WATER ST

STILLWATER DR

STONEWATER DR

TIMBER CT

ROYAL RIVER DR

MARIAH DR

ARBOR WAY

RAPID WATE R WAY

BUNCE CT

DAKOTACT

GER ALD CT

NEBRASKA DR

TRUCKEE CT

FRANQUETTE DR

ME AD OW W ALK D R

JEFFREY DR

ARIZONA WAY

STARLITE LN

CANTERBURY DR

M ONTA NA C T

ANDREW DR

LASK DR

BLUE OAK DR

HOMEWOOD DR

CRES CENT CT

LOIS LN
ARI CT

CARMELO WAY

OREGON WAY

CIRCASSIAN DR

TWINS WAY

GILL LI AND DR

PECAN DR

KELSEY C T

LONELY OAK DR

AURORA DR

COTTON ROSSER WAY

DELONE DR

STEPHEN WAY

DRUMMOND DR

OLEANDER DR

BARON CT

SCIROCCO DR

SHADY CT

TWIN RIVERS DR

PEORIA DR

BRA NDON ST

ATLANT SI WAY NEPTUNE DR CRYSTAL CRE EK LN

TRADEWIND DR

SOUTHPOINTE DR

SH ER MAN CT

CORBY CT

GALAXY DR

CALAVERAS CT

TULSA DR

DOLPHIN CT

MARLIN CT

PACIF CI A DR

NAUTILUS CT

RADDISON DR

VOBORIL AVE

ASHLEY WAY

DENNIS WAY

COLUMB AI DR

GLE N W O OD DR

RICKEY DR

SW IFT CREEK CT
OAK CT

NAURA CT

WHITE ROCK DR

SECOND ST

CLARO CT

W HISPE RING O AK S CT

FALLING ROC K CT

SUNWESTD R

MAYETTE CT

CECILY CT

BIG OAKS CT

MORRISON BEND

TEAL CT

HAMSTEADLN

EMERALD DR

CARR DR

TIFFANY WAY

MURRAY CT

SHELBY CT ZEPHYR DR

CRESTMONTCT

WISCONSIN CT

SPRING CREEK CT

EL VALLAS CIR

QUEENSBURY WAY

MUIR RD

CAM NI ITO AVE

WHITE OAK DR

SHADY LN

HIGHLAND AVE

NOTTINGHAM WAY

LOS BRAVOSDR

RAPID FALLS DR

HARTLEY WAY

SLEEPY DR

TEESDALE CT

SAM RIDER WAY

JOHN WAYNE DR

MICHIGAN CT

UTAH CT

SCOTTEN CT

EASTCREST CT

GRAYSTONE CT

MC CALL AVE

MALICK AVE

JESSIE AVE

CAROLINA AVE

DEER CREEK DR

MACKENZIE DR

BRANDSTATT AVE

EDGEWATER WAY

VITTORIA GROVE CT

IDAHO WAY

KELLI DR

SAVANNAH DR

EPLEY DR

MOSBURG LP

WINDWA RD W AY

CLAREMONT WAY

WHITE WATER WAY

WHISPERING OAKS DR

CO U RTYARD WAY

MISSISSIPPI DR

BIG OAKS DR

KAREN DR

STAPLE DR

BURNS DR

HASSETT AVE

GENEVA AVE

PUTMAN AVE

EASTWIND DR

CELEST AI L WAY

HILLCREST AVE

TUSCAN RD
Lighting & Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1
Zones of Benefit

QUEENS AVE

S WALTON AVE

CLARK AVE

GRAY AVE

BUTTE HOUSE RD

FRANKLIN AVE

WESTERN PKWY

SUNSWEET BLVD

N WALTON AVE

PLUMAS ST

ROYO RANCHERO RD

RICHLAND RD

LINCOLN RD

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

OHLEYER RD

SHANGHAI BEND RD

HARTER PKWY

THARP RD

HOOPER RD

TIERRA BUENA RD

STABLER LN

RAILROAD AVE

LIVE OAK BLVD

BRIDGE ST

S GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

GRAY AVE

LINCOLN RD

CLARK AVE

FRANKLIN RD

PEASE RD

GARDEN HWY

BOGUE RD
Highway 20
Highway 99 Highway 99
Legend
Maintenance Districts
City Limits

Page 336 of 403 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 337 of 403 ends

DISTRICT 1 PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS
District Zone of Benefit
FY 2022/23
Proposed Levy
Rate ($)
Change From
Previous Year
($)
Maximum
Levy Rate
Allowed ($)
A $56.72 $0.00 $56.72
B $29.50 $0.00 $29.50
B_1 $36.58 $2.54 $36.59
1 B_2 $334.80 $23.29 $334.81

Page 338 of 403 ends

Agenda Item 19

CITY OF YUBA CITY

STAFF REPORT
Date: August 16, 2022
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Public Works Department
Presentation By: Joshua Wolffe, Associate Engineer
Summary
Subject: Yuba City Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 2, 3, 4, & 5 (Town Center and 69 subdivisions throughout Yuba City), and Yuba City Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Commercial District) Levying Assessments
Recommendation: A. Conduct a Public Hearing
B. Adopt a Resolution confirming and ordering the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23 for the Yuba City Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 (Town Center, 69 subdivisions throughout Yuba City including the Palisades Subdivisions and Butte Vista neighborhood, and commercial district)
Fiscal Impact: Receipt of assessments and expenditures of funds for lighting and landscape maintenance districts throughout the City.

Purpose:

To continue to provide Lighting and Landscape Maintenance throughout the City pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

Council Strategic Goal:

Levying Yuba City Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 2, 3, 4 & 5, and Yuba City Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (LLMD Nos. 2-6) addresses the City Council’s Strategic Goal of maintaining infrastructure, as levying (LLMD Nos. 2-6) will ensure that street lighting, landscaping and associated items, block walls, detention ponds, and street-end barricades are maintained and in operation.

Background:

The City annually levies and collects special assessments in order to maintain and service landscaping and lighting improvements that provide special benefit to the parcels identified in Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Districts 2-6 (Attachment 1, Exhibit A). The assessments were approved by the property owners of record through a protest-ballot proceeding at the time the Districts were formed.

Page 339 of 403 ends

District Nos. 2 (Town Square Area); 3, 4, and 5 (69 subdivisions located throughout the City); and 6 (several commercial areas throughout the City) have provisions for a Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA), which is based on the Consumer Price Index from January to January. The COLA was determined to be a 7.48% change from last year.

On July 5, 2022, Council adopted Resolutions directing the filing of the Annual Reports. On July 19, 2022, Council adopted Resolutions of intention to order the improvements, and set a Public Hearing for August 16, 2022 to establish the assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

Analysis:

The Engineer’s Annual Reports have been prepared and are on file in the City Clerk’s office. They describe each District, the improvements therein, the method of assessment, and the proposed assessment for each parcel.

District Nos. 3, 4, 6, and District 5 Zones of Benefit B-L will see increases in their annual levies, while District 2 Zone of Benefit A, and District 5 Zone of Benefit A will see decreases in their annual levies.

The levies were raised in response to inflation, while District 2 Zone of Benefit A, and District 5 Zone of Benefit A levies were decreased due to sufficient reserves and revenues which exceeded expenditures.

Fiscal Impact:

The proposed assessments for FY 2022-23 are shown in Attachment 2.

The projected revenue, expenditures, and cash balance, which include capital reserve, for the Districts are as follows:

District Revenue Expenditures Projected Reserve Fund Balance as of 7/1/23*
2 $83,372 $41,035 $111,665
3 $10,662 $8,676 $27,566
4 $153,205 $135,737 $144,411
5 $576,028 $577,970 $221,880
6 $29,125 $14,792 $141,897
*The Projected Reserve Fund Balance is the total of the Capital Replacement Reserve plus the Operating Reserve.

Alternatives:

1. Council may direct the modification of the assessment amounts which will affect future revenue and expenditure amounts in Fiscal Year 2022-23, or cancel the Districts and find alternative funding sources to maintain the lighting and landscaping.

Attachments:

1. Attachment 1 - Resolution LLMD Nos. 2-6 Public Hearing

2. Exhibit A - District 2-6 Maps

3. Attachment 2 - Proposed Assessments D 2-6 Public Hearing Prepared By: Submitted By:

Josh Wolffe
Associate Civil Engineer
Diana Langley
City Manager

Page 340 of 403 ends
Page 341 of 403 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 342 of 403 ends

RESOLUTION NO. _________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUBA CITY

CONFIRMING AND ORDERING THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 FOR THE YUBA CITY LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 (TOWN CENTER, 69 SUBDIVISIONS THROUGHOUT YUBA

CITY INCLUDING THE PALISADES SUBDIVISIONS AND BUTTE VISTA NEIGHBORHOOD,

AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICT)
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2022, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500) (the “Act”), the City Council of the City of Yuba City did declare its intention to review, levy and collect the annual assessment for Yuba City Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (“Districts”) for Fiscal Year 2022-23 more specifically as follows:
 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – Zone of Benefit “A” (Town Center);  Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 – Zone of Benefit “A” (Palisades Subdivision);
 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 – Zones of Benefit “A,” “B,” “C,” and “D” (Butte Vista Neighborhood);
 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 – Zones of Benefit “A,” “B,” “C,” “D,” “E,” “F,” “G,” “H,” “I,” “J,” “K,” and “L”;
 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 – Zones of Benefit “A_1,” “A_2” and “A_3,” Zones of Benefit “B_1,” “B_2,” “B_3,” “B_4,” “B_5,” “B_6,” “B_7,” “B_8,” “B_9,” “B_10,” “B_12,” “B_13,” “B_14,” “B_15,” and Zone of Benefit “C_1”; and WHEREAS, assessments levied within the Districts provided revenue for the purpose of financing the installation, construction, and maintenance of certain public projects eligible under the Act, including without limitation the following:
 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 2: Ongoing maintenance and servicing of landscaping material, irrigation systems, and street lighting in the Town Center Area along the frontage of Plumas Street (including median), C Street, Percy Avenue, B Street and Franklin Avenue.
 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: Ongoing maintenance and servicing of a detention pond, street trees and a pond landscape strip, and twelve street lights, which benefit parcels in Phases 1 and 2.
 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4: Ongoing maintenance and servicing of local street lighting, landscaping improvements, and detention pond, providing special benefit to the Butte Vista Neighborhood in the subdivisions in zones of benefit as shown on the Assessment Diagrams on file with the City Clerk.  Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 5: Street lights, walls, landscape strips and planters, street trees, and landscaped entrance varying by zones of benefit as shown on the Assessment Diagrams on file with the City Clerk.  Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 6: Ongoing maintenance and servicing of street lights, street trees and median landscaping; and WHEREAS, said Council did declare its intention to levy and collect the annual assessment for the maintenance and operation of the lighting and landscaping facilities in said Districts; and

Page 343 of 403 ends

WHEREAS, on July 5, 2022, pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the City Council initiated proceedings by Resolution No. 22-103 for the levy and collection of assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land in the Districts for Fiscal Year 2022-23 and directed the Engineer of Work, Tyrone Peter of Willdan Financial Services, to prepare and file a written report in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the Act; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Act, the Engineer of Work prepared and filed such report for each Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District (the “Engineer’s Reports”) with the City Clerk, and the City Clerk has presented the Engineer’s Reports to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-113 approving the Engineer’s Reports, which calculated the annual assessments for the parcels in said Districts, as filed pursuant to Section 22623 of the Act, and
WHEREAS, the public notice of the Resolution of Intention and the Public Hearing scheduled for August 16, 2022, was duly published on August 5, 2022.

NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Yuba City as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

2. The City Council hereby (1) finds that the public interest and convenience requires and (2) declares its intention to order the levy of and to collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of property within existing assessment districts designated “Yuba City Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 2”, “Yuba City Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 3”, “Yuba City Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4”, “Yuba City Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 5”, and “Yuba City Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 6” (the “Districts”) pursuant to the provisions of the Act, for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023, to pay for the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the Engineer’s Reports for each District.

3. That the City Council hereby determines that the territories within the Districts, whose boundaries are set forth in the Engineer’s Reports, on file with the City Clerk of the City of Yuba City, will be the territories benefited by the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in said Engineer’s Reports.

4. That the hearing on said annual levy of assessment was held in accordance with law and all persons desiring to speak were heard.

5. That the Engineer’s Report, the diagram for the assessment district and the assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements contained therewith and each and every part of said Report, is adopted and approved as to each District and all of them, and that the assessment of the total amount of the costs and the individual assessments thereof, respectively, from said improvements, and of the expenses incidental thereto, be and the same hereby are finally approved and confirmed as the assessments to pay the costs. The assessment for District No. 2 and District No. 5 Zone of Benefit “A,” for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are proposed to be

Page 344 of 403 ends

reduced as compared to the previous year as described in the Engineer’s Report.

The assessments for District Nos. 3, 4, 5 (except Zone of Benefit “A”), and 6 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are proposed to increase from the previous year as described in the Engineer’s Report, but are still within or less than the amount approved for District Nos. 3, 4, 5 (except Zone of Benefit “A”), and 6 at the at the time of the formation of the respective Districts.

6. The Council hereby orders the levy of the assessments described in said Resolution of Intention and the Engineer’s Reports.

7. That the assessment diagram showing the assessment districts referred to in said Resolution of Intention, and also the subdivision of land within the Districts, as contained in said Engineer’s Reports, be and it is hereby finally approved and confirmed as the diagram of the properties to be assessed to pay the costs of the improvements.

8. The City Clerk shall file the diagram and assessment, as confirmed or certified copy thereof, with the Sutter County Auditor-Controller no later than August 19, 2022.

9. As the levies either remain the same, or are reduced as compared to prior years as to District No. 2 and District No. 5 Zone of Benefit “A,” the assessments for District No. 2 and District No. 5 Zone of Benefit “A” are exempted from the requirements of Article XIII Section “D” of the California Constitution (Proposition 218). Likewise, although the levies have increased for District Nos. 3, 4, 5 (except Zone of Benefit “A”), and 6 as compared to the prior year, the levy amounts are consistent with and less than the previously approved COLA adopted at the time of formation of the District pursuant to Proposition 218, and as such, the levies for District Nos. 3, 4, 5 (except Zone of Benefit “A”), and 6 are likewise exempt from further compliance with Proposition 218.

The foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Yuba City at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of August 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Page 345 of 403 ends

Dave Shaw, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ciara Wakefield, Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM

COUNSEL FOR YUBA CITY
Shannon L. Chaffin, City Attorney
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
Attachment(s):

Exhibit A – District Maps

Page 346 of 403 ends

EXHIBIT A

Page 347 of 403 ends

2A
2A
2A

FRANKLIN AVE

FREMONT WAY

WILBUR AVE

REEVES AVE

PERCY AVE
B ST

BRIDGE ST

PLUMAS ST

WALNUT ST

P NI E WAY
A ST

JEWELL AVE

ALMOND ST

CHESTNUT ST

STEVENS AVE

CEMETARY WAY

JONES ST
C ST

PLUMAS BLVD

FIFTHST BRIDGE ST WB OFF

SHASTA ST

CURR EI R WAY

E TABER AVE

HAWTHORNE ST

NIELSON AVE
ELM ST

BOYD ST

BENNETT WAY

ROWE AVE

ROB NI SON AVE

LINDEN ST

MOORE AVE

EMERSON ST

TABER AVE

TOWN SQUARE

SCOTT ST

CAMPBELL WAY

SPRUCE WAY

BROOKS AVE

PAGE AVE

PALM AVE

WILLOW WAY
L DEL MONTE AVEighting & Landscape
Maintenance District No.2
Zones of Benefit

QUEENS AVE

S WALTON AVE

CLARK AVE

GRAY AVE

BUTTE HOUSE RD

FRANKLIN AVE

WESTERN PKWY

SUNSWEET BLVD

N WALTON AVE

PLUMAS ST

ROYO RANCHERO RD

RICHLAND RD

LINCOLN RD

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

OHLEYER RD

SHANGHAI BEND RD

HARTER PKWY

THARP RD

HOOPER RD

TIERRA BUENA RD

STABLER LN

RAILROAD AVE

LIVE OAK BLVD

BRIDGE ST

S GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

GRAY AVE

LINCOLN RD

CLARK AVE

FRANKLIN RD

PEASE RD

GARDEN HWY

BOGUE RD
Highway
Highway 20
Highway 99 Highway 99
8 Legend
Maintenance Districts
City Limits
µ

Page 348 of 403 ends

3A

CLARK AVE

PORTSMOUTH DR

B RI M NI GTON DR

BUCK NI GHAM DR

E ONSTOTT FRTG RD

WOODLAND DR

GRAY AVE

GREENGATE ST

PARKBROOK CT

NORWICH WAY

VISTA CT

BRAR CT

MANCHESTER WAY

SANTA BARBARA WAY

KENSINGTON WAY

WESTMINSTER DR

BRISTOL CT

OAKVIEW DR WILLOW CREEK DR

NORTH POINT DR

BARWICK WAY

LANCASTER WAY

BROOKSIDE CT

YORK DR

NEWCASTLE DR

GREENHAVEN DR

BR AI RWOOD CT

SWARN CT

BAYWOOD CT

WHITNEY DR

PROV DI ENCE CT

OXFORD CT

FORESTVIEW DR

SKYLINE DR

CARLISLE WAY

NORTHWOODS DR

CAMDEN WAY

NORTH RIDGE DR

MAYFLOWER WAY
HWY 99
Lighting & Landscape
Maintenance District No. 3
Zones of Benefit

QUEENS AVE

S WALTON AVE

CLARK AVE

GRAY AVE

BUTTE HOUSE RD

FRANKLIN AVE

WESTERN PKWY

SUNSWEET BLVD

N WALTON AVE

PLUMAS ST

ROYO RANCHERO RD

RICHLAND RD

LINCOLN RD

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

OHLEYER RD

SHANGHAI BEND RD

HARTER PKWY

THARP RD

HOOPER RD

TIERRA BUENA RD

STABLER LN

RAILROAD AVE

LIVE OAK BLVD

BRIDGE ST

S GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

GRAY AVE

LINCOLN RD

CLARK AVE

FRANKLIN RD

PEASE RD

GARDEN HWY

BOGUE RD
Highway
Highway 20
Highway 99 Highway 99
8 Legend
Maintenance Districts
City Limits
µ

Page 349 of 403 ends

4A
4C
4D_3
4D
4D_2
4B 4D

LIZANNE DR

COLE CT

NINA WAY

PATT Y DR

STABLER LN

BLEV NI RD

PEASE RD

BUTTE VISTA LN

DOROTHY LN

SPR GI CT

RIVERBEND CT

HAWK CT

CARTAGENA DR

STABLER PARK DR

TRES PICOS DR

OAKBROOK CT

ROBIN CT

TUMBER WAY

MONTCLAIR DR

PARC WEST DR

MESS NI A DR

QUA LI CT

JAMIE DR

S EI NNA WAY

W ONSTOTT FR TG RD

OSPREY CT

VINTAGE CT

PIN TAIL CT

REGENCY WAY

PLUM CT

DOVE CT

RACHEL CT

NORTHF EI LD CT

OAKBROOK DR

GURJ WAY

EMILY LN

GROUSE WAY

RICH LN

SOMERSET WAY

PROVENCE DR BROOKFIELD CT

NORTHFIELD DR

CUMMINGS CT

RIO VISTA SAMUEL JAMES CT

COLIN CT

CANDACE CT

KENDALL CT
BAL CT

MALKIT CT

SATORI WAY

PHEASANT DR

CHLOE CT

MEHAR CT

RAVI CT

SUKH DR

PABLA CT

VALLEY CT

PARC EAST DR

LORRAINE WAY

BUTTE BEND LN

MEADOWLARK WAY

CHANDLER WAY

REBECCA DR

BUTTEVISTA
L N
Lighting & Landscape
Maintenance District No.4
Zones of Benefit

QUEENS AVE

S WALTON AVE

CLARK AVE

GRAY AVE

BUTTE HOUSE RD

FRANKLIN AVE

WESTERN PKWY

SUNSWEET BLVD

N WALTON AVE

PLUMAS ST

ROYO RANCHERO RD

RICHLAND RD

LINCOLN RD

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

OHLEYER RD

SHANGHAI BEND RD

HARTER PKWY

THARP RD

HOOPER RD

TIERRA BUENA RD

STABLER LN

RAILROAD AVE

LIVE OAK BLVD

BRIDGE ST

S GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

GRAY AVE

LINCOLN RD

CLARK AVE

FRANKLIN RD

PEASE RD

GARDEN HWY

BOGUE RD
Highway
Highway 20
Highway 99 Highway 99
8 Legend
Maintenance Districts
City Limits
µ

Page 350 of 403 ends

5C_3
5K_8
5K_15
5K_8
5K_11
5K_10
5K_12

BEECHWOOD CT

WREN CT

F NI CH CT

JAMIE DR

MEADOWLARK WAY

PORTOFINO DR

REDWOOD WAY

CYPRESS DR

MAGNOL AI WAY

PEASE RD

CAMELIA WAY JUDY WAY

LAKE DR

B RI M NI GTON DR

CHASITY WAY

BUCK NI GHAM DR

LIVE OAK BLVD

CARTAGENA DR

CLARK AVE

PARKBROOK CT

HERITAGE DR

GRAY AVE

JOHN DR

NORWICH WAY

VISTA CT

BRAR CT

MANCHESTER WAY

HOWARD DR

BEUTLER DR

HOLMES DR

DELL WAY

IRIS WAY

SANTA BARBARA WAY

HUNT ST

PORTSMOUTH DR

E ONSTOTT FRTG RD

KENSINGTON WAY

WESTMINSTER DR

TRES PICOS DR

BRISTOLCT

NORTHGATE DR

PHEASANT DR

GREENGATE ST

WOODLAND DR

OAKVIEW DR WILLOW CREEK DR

NORTH POINT DR

BARWICK WAY

LANCASTER WAY

BROOKSIDE CT

YORK DR

NEWCASTLE DR

GREENHAVEN DR

BR AI RWOOD CT

SWARN CT

BAYWOOD CT

WHITNEY DR

WILLOW WAY

PROV DI ENCE CT

DEBBIE WAY

GARY DR

RANDY WAY

LILAC WAY

ROSE WAY

FORESTVIEW DR

MAJORCA DR

W ONSTOTT FRTG RD

BRIGHTON WAY

SKYLINE DR

CARLISLE WAY

NORTHWOODS DR

ORCHID WAY

CAMDEN WAY

NORTH RIDGE DR

OXFORD CT

MAYFLOWER WAY

C TI RUS DR
HWY 99

BEYMER LOOP
Lighting & Landscape
Maintenance District No.5
Zones of Benefit

QUEENS AVE

S WALTON AVE

CLARK AVE

GRAY AVE

BUTTE HOUSE RD

FRANKLIN AVE

WESTERN PKWY

SUNSWEET BLVD

N WALTON AVE

PLUMAS ST

ROYO RANCHERO RD

RICHLAND RD

LINCOLN RD

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

OHLEYER RD

SHANGHAI BEND RD

HARTER PKWY

THARP RD

HOOPER RD

TIERRA BUENA RD

STABLER LN

RAILROAD AVE

LIVE OAK BLVD

BRIDGE ST

S GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

GRAY AVE

LINCOLN RD

CLARK AVE

FRANKLIN RD

PEASE RD

GARDEN HWY

BOGUE RD
Highway
Highway 20
Highway 99 Highway 99
8 Legend
Maintenance Districts
City Limits
µ

Page 351 of 403 ends

5J
5J_2
5J_3
5J_11
5J_12
5J_14
5K_18
5K_14
5K_18

BUTTE HOUSE RD

BLEV NI RD

LA ENTRADA WAY

VALENCIA ST

LONG ST

LA BREA WAY

KENNETH WAY

TULY PKWY

ROMERO ST

EL VERANO WAY

LA ESPERANZA WAY

CAPISTRANO ST

PERALTA ST

LAREDO ST

ZAMORA ST

JANICE WAY

EL VERANDA CT

EL SOBRANTE CT

KRISTINA MILLER DR

TRES PICOS DR

HEIDI WAY

NICK CT

BETTY CT

AKERS CT

JAYNE CT

QUEENS AVE

VALLEY VIEW DR

RACHEL CT

NORTHF EI LD CT

CORSICA DR

PROVENCE DR

NADEAN DR

BRADLEY ESTATES DR

PORTOFINO DR

MICHAEL WAY

ESPLANADE WAY

EL ZI ABETH LN

MANN DR

DOMA NI WAY

NORTHF EI LD DR

JAMIE DR

PATTY DR

EL CERRITO CT

NINA WAY

M AI LP

HERBERT CT

DIJON CT

SHAY WAY

WARD CT

LA GRANDE WAY

GENOA CT

CHLOE CT

SHARON DR

GRANADA WAY

REBECCA DR

EL GRANERO WAY

HARTER RD

LORRAINE WAY

COLE CT

LIZANNE DR

CASE CT

COBBLESTONE CT

TURIN DR

CALAIS DR

ROLLING ROCK CT

PAULA DR

EL ENCINO WAY

ELMER AVE

ORO GRANDE ST

ADAMS RD
Lighting & Landscape
Maintenance District No.5
Zones of Benefit

QUEENS AVE

S WALTON AVE

CLARK AVE

GRAY AVE

BUTTE HOUSE RD

FRANKLIN AVE

WESTERN PKWY

SUNSWEET BLVD

N WALTON AVE

PLUMAS ST

ROYO RANCHERO RD

RICHLAND RD

LINCOLN RD

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

OHLEYER RD

SHANGHAI BEND RD

HARTER PKWY

THARP RD

HOOPER RD

TIERRA BUENA RD

STABLER LN

RAILROAD AVE

LIVE OAK BLVD

BRIDGE ST

S GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

GRAY AVE

LINCOLN RD

CLARK AVE

FRANKLIN RD

PEASE RD

GARDEN HWY

BOGUE RD
Highway
Highway 20
Highway 99 Highway 99
8 Legend
Maintenance Districts
City Limits
µ

Page 352 of 403 ends

5C_9
5C_7
5J_5
5C_10

FIRENZE CT

V AI ROMA WAY

SAN NICCOLO DR

HOOPER RD

SAN GIMIGNANO DR

MONROE RD
Lighting & Landscape
Maintenance District No.5
Zones of Benefit

QUEENS AVE

S WALTON AVE

CLARK AVE

GRAY AVE

BUTTE HOUSE RD

FRANKLIN AVE

W ESTERN PKWY

SUNSW EET BLVD

N WALTON AVE

PLUM AS ST

ROYO RANCHERO RD

RICHLAND RD

LINCOLN RD

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

OHLEYER RD

SHANGHAI BEND RD

HARTER PKWY

THARP RD

HOOPER RD

TIERRA BUENA RD

STABLER LN

RAILROAD AVE

LIVE OAK BLVD

BRIDGE ST

S GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

GRAY AVE

LINCOLN RD

CLARK AVE

FRANKLIN RD

PEASE RD

GARDEN HW Y

BOGUE RD
Highway
Highway 20
Highway 99 Highway 99
8 Legend
Maintenance Districts
City Limits
µ

Page 353 of 403 ends

5K_13
5K_9
5K_16
5K_16 5H_4

PATTO NAVE

PERSHING AVE

HAL SEY AVE

MARSHAL L AVE

JEFFERSON AVE

AME RICANA DR

ROXBURY CT

NANTUCKET CT

TEAL HOLLOW DR

TUL OI ST

CHRISTIA NSEN WAY

STONEGATE DR
BOB CT

WESTERN PKWY

MONROE DR

ALICIA CT

HAC EI NDA CT

TORI CT

VERANO CT

LIBBY LN

ROYO RANCHERO RD

ROOSEVELT RD

PARIS WAY

JORI CT

YORKTOWN DR

STE DI LMAYER WAY

CYNDA LN

JAMES MARSHAL WAY

EMMA CT

SIERRA VISTA DR

TORI LN

LYNCHBURG CT

MARCOS CT

LORETTA CT

CAPE COD CT

COUGHL NI CT

LA MANTIA DR

KIM WAY

VOGT CT

LYLE CT

COLONIAL CT

LYNCHBURG DR

VAN VLECK ST

MARBLE CT

GRANITE DR

PEBBLE CT

INDEPENDENCE DR

WALLACE WAY

JOHN FREEMONT WAY

BUENA VISTA DR

SAM BRANNAN WAY
RUE DR

DONA WAY

TOMBI WAY

WILLIAMSBURG DR

STONEY DR

GREENE LN

MONROE RD
HWY 20

COLUSA FRONTAGE RD
Lighting & Landscape
Maintenance District No.5
Zones of Benefit

QUEENS AVE

S WALTON AVE

CLARK AVE

GRAY AVE

BUTTE HOUSE RD

FRANKLIN AVE

WESTERN PKWY

SUNSWEET BLVD

N WALTON AVE

PLUMAS ST

ROYO RANCHERO RD

RICHLAND RD

LINCOLN RD

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

OHLEYER RD

SHANGHAI BEND RD

HARTER PKWY

THARP RD

HOOPER RD

TIERRA BUENA RD

STABLER LN

RAILROAD AVE

LIVE OAK BLVD

BRIDGE ST

S GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

GRAY AVE

LINCOLN RD

CLARK AVE

FRANKLIN RD

PEASE RD

GARDEN HWY

BOGUE RD
Highway
Highway 20
Highway 99 Highway 99
8 Legend
Maintenance Districts
City Limits
µ

Page 354 of 403 ends

5H_1
5B_1
5D 5E
5H_3
5K_1
5K_9
5K_5
5K_7
5K_6
5K_2
5K_3
5K_4
5H_8

S WALTON AVE

MANZANITA WAY

EVERGREEN WAY

STABLER L N

CIVIC CENTER BLV D

THARP RD

HARTER RD

S HARDING RD

B RI CHWOOD CT

GLENBROOK CT

DEERFIELD DR

DAVIS AVE

MONTE AVE

RYAN DR

HARTER PRKWY

JESS CI A DR

FRANKLIN RD

NANTUCKET WAY

BR SI TOL WAY

JOANN WAY

KLAMATH LN

CAMINO DEL FLORES

HOLLY TREE DR

VERNON AVE

BANCROFT AVE

HUNJI DR

BERKSHIRE DR

ANDROSS AVE

HARDIAL CT

BARRINGTON DR

NEWPORT DR
HWY 20

RAI ESTATES CT

BRIDGE ST

LITTLE JOHN RD

AMARPAL CT

EVEREST CT

W HYLER RD

WOODSIDE DR

PEL CI AN PL

LAMBERT CT

JASON CT

AN TI A WAY

CARSON DR

WILDFLOWER CIR

REDHAVEN AVE

RAMERIZ DR

N HARD NI G RD

TEMPLE WAY

COUNTRYSIDE DR

CAMINO DEL ORO

OLIVER DR

ADELINE ST

ZACHARY WAY

NEIL DR

WOODLEAF DR

N WALTON AVE

LASSEN BLVD

POPPY LN

PER WI NI KLE LN

MARK THOMAS DR

WILLOWBROOK DR

TRAVIS CT

MICHELLE DR

COLUSA FRONTAGE R D

HARDIAL DR

YORKSH RI E WAY

COLLEGE HILL WAY

EMMET WAY

SANTI CT

HARBANS DR

SHAKEWOOD DR

BOWEN CT

KLAMT CT

JOY WAY

GURDAS CT

SPIRIT DR

N OL VI ER DR

ROSS DR

HETHER NI GTON C RI

BRAYTON LP

ALFRED WAY

SIERRA AVE

ANNEKA LN

HAYNE AVE

SUNSWEET BLVD
Lighting & Landscape
Maintenance District No.5
Zones of Benefit

QUEENS AVE

S WALTON AVE

CLARK AVE

GRAY AVE

BUTTE HOUSE RD

FRANKLIN AVE

WESTERN PKWY

SUNSWEET BLVD

N WALTON AVE

PLUMAS ST

ROYO RANCHERO RD

RICHLAND RD

LINCOLN RD

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

OHLEYER RD

SHANGHAI BEND RD

HARTER PKWY

THARP RD

HOOPER RD

TIERRA BUENA RD

STABLER LN

RAILROAD AVE

LIVE OAK BLVD

BRIDGE ST

S GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

GRAY AVE

LINCOLN RD

CLARK AVE

FRANKLIN RD

PEASE RD

GARDEN HWY

BOGUE RD
Highway
Highway 20
Highway 99 Highway 99
8 Legend
Maintenance Districts
µ
City Limits

Page 355 of 403 ends

5L
5B_2
5H_2
5J_1
5I_3
5J_13
5J_6
5I_2
5I_1
5C_8
5H_4
5J_4
5J_5
5H_7
5K_17

REAGAN WAY

S WALTON AVE

CHERRY ST

LINCOLN RD

CORTEZ CT

CAMINO CORTEZ

SANBORN RD

DH LI LON DR

BURG ANDY DR

TUSCA NY DR

MARJOR EI DR

CREEKWOOD DR

GE RMAINE DR

JODI DR

NISH CT

LEONARD CT

BUCHANAN RD

RICHLAND RD

HAMPTON CT

ALLEN CT

THOMAS CT

LANCASTER CT

CLAYTON CT
ELI CT

PEBBLE BEACH DR

SANDPIPER DR

AUGUSTA LN

CLEO CT

PICO CT

JOHNATHAN CT

PEL CI AN PL

AN TI A WAY

ALLEN W AY

RUTHERFORD CT

ELDEN CT

WALTRIP CT

ANTHONY WAY

ELL OI T DR

S HARDING RD

RANCHO WAY

MAR NI A DR

CREST CT

W JOSEPH ST

EL SERENO CT

EL ZI ABETH CT
NANDCT

SHAYLENE CT

ANNA DR

MASERA CT

EDWIN DR
IDA CT

ESTATES CT

JOHNATHAN DR

MADDEN CT

CRISP DR

ERIC CT

LISA CT

ARROYA GRANDE

NAND DR

PORTOLA VALLEY RD

SESSLER DR

RICHARDS WAY

DEAN DR

MILTON DR

BRIAN DR

MC CUNE AVE

SAINT ANDREWS DR

NI DER LN TRACY DR

GREGORY DR

JOSEPHENE WAY

CREST DR

SPYGLASS DR
BAY DR

PATRICIA DR

THERESA WAY

THOMAS DR

ESTATES DR

MESA VERDE

KRISTIN CT

JOSEPH ST

GLEN WAY

RUSHING ST

MELINDA CT

SUNRISE CT

NELDA CT

MASERA WAY

DI A WAY

LA RAMADA

BROMLEY AVE

SAINT JOHN CT

MART NI CT

PETTY CT

SHEENA CT

MANZANITA WAY

AL CI AI DR V ERONICA CT

YOLANDA DR

JORDAN RD

TRIFF WAY

CAROLYN DR

SOFIA DR

KARNA LI CT

SESSLER PL

INEZ CT

STOKER AVE

G DI DA LOOP

EARNHARDT DR

WINGFOOT DR

KEVIN WAY

VIA JACINTO

LOUIS CT

PINEHURST DR

AARON DR

MORGAN WAY

NICOLAS DR

LA RABYN WAY

TORRY P NI E DR

CL NI T WAY

CHELSEA PL

RAJ CT DONALD CT

KRENTZ LN

GORDON WAY

GRE E NWIC H CIR

HARBOR TOWN DR

W OODRIDGE CT

HAZEL AVE
BAY CT

TANGLEWOOD CT

SMITH RD

PARK VIEW AVE

LITTLE JOHN RD

JACOB DR

SEQUOIA DR

ROBERT DR
Lighting & Landscape
Maintenance District No.5
Zones of Benefit

QUEENS AVE

S WALTON AVE

CLARK AVE

GRAY AVE

BUTTE HOUSE RD

FRANKLIN AVE

WESTERN PKWYSUNSWEET BLVD

N WALTON AVE

PLUMAS ST

ROYO RANCHERO RD

RICHLAND RD

LINCOLN RD

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

OHLEYER RD

SHANGHAI BEND RD

HARTER PKWY

THARP RD

HOOPER RD

TIERRA BUENA RD

STABLER LN

RAILROAD AVE

LIVE OAK BLVD

BRIDGE ST

S GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

GRAY AVE

LINCOLN RD

CLARK AVE

FRANKLIN RD

PEASE RD

GARDEN HWY

BOGUE RD
Highway
Highway 20
Highway 99 Highway 99
8 Legend
CityLimit_Dummy
Maintenance Districts
µ

Page 356 of 403 ends

5B_5

BRIDGE ST

COOPER AVE

CURR EI R WAY

JONES ST
B ST

TABER AVE

PARK AVE

MORLEY AVE

P NI E WAY

FREDERICK ST

FRANKLIN AVE

CAMPBELL WAY
ELM ST

SPRUCE WAY

BROOKS AVE

PALM AVE

WILLOW WAY

FRUITVALE AVE
A ST

LINDEN ST

HAWTHORNE ST

UNIVERSITY AVE

ROB NI SON AVE

FLETCHER WAY

PAGE AVE
Lighting & Landscape
Maintenance District No.5
Zones of Benefit

QUEENS AVE

S WALTON AVE

CLARK AVE

GRAY AVE

BUTTE HOUSE RD

FRANKLIN AVE

WESTERN PKWY

SUNSWEET BLVD

N WALTON AVE

PLUMAS ST

ROYO RANCHERO RD

RICHLAND RD

LINCOLN RD

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

OHLEYER RD

SHANGHAI BEND RD

HARTER PKWY

THARP RD

HOOPER RD

TIERRA BUENA RD

STABLER LN

RAILROAD AVE

LIVE OAK BLVD

BRIDGE ST

S GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

GRAY AVE

LINCOLN RD

CLARK AVE

FRANKLIN RD

PEASE RD

GARDEN HWY

BOGUE RD
Highway
Highway 20
Highway 99 Highway 99
8 Legend
Maintenance Districts
City Limits
µ

Page 357 of 403 ends

5A
5B
5G
5F
5B_3
5B_4
5C_1
5C
5C_5
5C_6 5C_4
5H_5
5C_2
5H_9

MEADOW AVE

BUNCE RD

GARDEN HWY

RICHLAND RD

JONES RD

LINCOLN RD

RAILROAD AVE

E HILLCREST AVE

HUNN RD

PEARSALL WAY

RANDOLPH DR

S BARRETT RD

BOGUE RD

MILES AVE

WINSHIP RD

CRESTMONT AVE

SINGH'S WAY

WHISTLEWOOD CT

BRENTWOODDR

CORNWELL AVE

MILL CREEK WAY

SAMUEL DR

TEESDALE RD

GROVE CT

GOLD RIVER DR

HASTINGS WAY

ALMOND GROVE DR

JOHN TEE DR

STONYBROOK DR

MARINER LOOP

SHANGHAI BEND RD

DEL LAGO

CARISSA CT

SLAWRENCE AVE

MARGARETCT

PARK AVE

PAY NE CT

SOUTHLAND DR

ASHWOOD CT

HASTINGS CT

PHILLIPS RD

WI NSHI PCT

AL DERWOO D CT

TA RA CT

JILL CT
JAN CT

JUDITH CT

ATLANTIC CT

TRIDENT CT

RIDGE WAY

PA MELA CT

WILD RIVER DR

WESTERN AVE

VICTORIA CT

EUREKA DR

STONYBROOK CT

DORCAS CT

W ESTW OOD DR

MAGNOLIA DR

SOUTH PARK DR LA GRANDE AVE

RIVER OAKS DR
REO DR

MILLFRONT AVE

MARINER WAY

VILLA GE CT

BLACK CT

BUCK RIVERTS

WAVERLY CT

DEEBEERS CT

COLONY CT

HAVEN CT

CAM BRIDGE CT

DIAMOND POINTE WAY

TULSA CT

BURL CT

MARIPOSA DR

WOODHAVEN DR

ROCKY CT

KATHERINE CT
RHINEC
W
T

IND RIVER CT

KATHLEEN WAY

GEE BEE WAY

ALBATROSS AVE

BERNARD DR

SOUTHWIND DR

CA RLOTTA WAY

COLD WATER ST

STILLWATER DR

STONEWATER DR

TIMBER CT

ROYAL RIVER DR

MARIAH DR

ARBOR WAY

RAPID WATER WAY

BUNCE C T

DORMAN AVE

SA NI T JA MES CT

DAK OTA CT

GERALD CT

NEBRASKA DR

TRUCKEE CT

FRANQUETTE DR

ORCHARD ST

MEADOW WAL K DR

JEFFREY DR

ARIZONA WAY

STARLITE LN

CANTERBURY DR

MONTANA CT

ANDREW DR LAUREL DR

LASK DR

BLUE OAK DR

HOMEWOOD DR

CRESCENT CT

LOIS LN

MAIN ST
ARI CT

CARMELO WAY

OREGON WAY

CIRCASSIAN DR

TWINS WAY

GILL LI AND DR

PECAN DR

KELSEY CT

LONELY OAK DR

AURORA DR

COTTON ROSSER WAY

DELONE DR

JULIE DR

STEPHEN WAY

DRUMMOND DR

OLEANDER DR

BARON CT

SCIROCCO DR

SHADY CT

TWIN RIVERS DR

PEORIA DR

BRANDON ST

AT LA NT SI WAY

NEPTUNE DR CRYSTAL CREEK LN

TRADEWIND DR

SOUTHPOINTE DR

SHERMAN CT

CORBY CT

GALAXY DR

CALAVERAS CT

TULSA DR

DOLPHIN CT

O AK HOLLOW

MARLIN CT

PACIF CI A DR

NAUTILUS CT

WINDSOR DR

RADDISON DR

VOBORIL AVE

RAMONAAVE

ASHLEY WAY

DENNIS WAY

COLUMB AI DR

RICKEY DR

SWIFT CREEK CT
OAK CT

NAURA CT

WHITE ROCK DR

CLARO CT

BENTON DR

WH ISPE RING OAK S CT

FALLING ROCK CT

SUNWESTDR

MAYETTE CT

CECILY CT

BIG OAKS CT

SHERWOOD DR

NORMANDY CT

M ORRISON BEND

TEAL CT

HAMSTEAD LN

CRESWELL DR

EMERALD DR

TIFFANY WAY

MURRAY CT

SHELBY CT

SMITH RD

ZEPHYR DR

CRESTMONTCT

WISCONSIN CT

SPRING CREEK CT WATERBURY CT

EL VALLAS CIR

S CLARK AVE

QUEENSBURY WAY

WOODHURST CT

WHITE OAK DR

SHADY LN

HIGHLAND AVE

NOTTINGHAM WAY

GLENWOOD DR

JAMES LN

RAPID FALLS DR

HARTLEY WAY

SLEEPY DR

TEESDALE CT

SAM RIDER WAY

WOODBRIDGE AVE

JOHN WAYNE DR

MICHIGAN CT

UTAH CT

SCOTTEN CT

EASTCREST CT

MAYFAIR AVE

GRAYSTONE CT

MC CALL AVE

MALICK AVE

JESSIE AVE

CAROLINA AVE

DEER CREEK DR

MACKENZIE DR

BRANDSTATT AVE

EDGEWATER WAY

IDAHO WAY

KELLI DR

SAVANNAH DR

EPLEY DR

CENTER DR

MOSBURG LP

WINDW ARD WAY

CLAREMONT WAY

WHITE WATER WAY

WHISPERING OAKS DR

COURTYARD WAY

ATWOOD DR

MISSISSIPPI DR

TRINITY AVE

BIG OAKS DR

KAREN DR

BELL AVE

STAPLE DR

BURNS DR

HASSETT AVE

GENEVA AVE

PUTMAN AVE

LA CASA AVE

MADRONE DR

EASTWIND DR

BRIAR LN

CELEST AI L WAY

HILLCREST AVE

MC KEEHAN DR

SECOND ST

TUSCAN RD
Lighting & Landscape
Maintenance District No.5
Zones of Benefit

QUE ENS AVE

S WALTON AVE

CLARK AVE

GRAY AV E

BUTTE HOUS E RD

FRANKLIN AV E

W ES TERN PKW Y

SUNSW EET BLVD

N WALTON AVE

P LUM AS ST

ROYO RANCHERO RD

RICHLAND RD

LINCOLN RD

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

OHLEYER RD

SHANGHAI BEND RD

HARTER PKW Y

THARP RD

HOOPER RD

TIERRA BUENA RD

STABLER LN

RAILROAD AVE

LIV E OAK BLVD

BRIDGE ST

S GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

GRAY AV E

LINCOLN RD

CLARK AVE

FRANKLIN RD

PEASE RD

GARDEN HW Y

BOGUE RD
Highway
Highwa y 20
Highway 99 Highway 99
8 Legend
Maintenance Districts
City Limits
µ

Page 358 of 403 ends

6A_3
6A_1
6A_2
6B_1
6B_2
6B_3
6B_4
6B_5
6B_6
6B_7
6B_8
6B_9
6B_10
6B_12
6B_13
6B_14
6B_15
6C_1

REAGAN WAY

BUNCE RD S CLARK AVE

S WALTON AVE

COOPER AVE

CHERRY ST

WASHINGTON AVE

WILBUR AVE

PLUMAS ST

LIVE OAK BLVD

N GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

RICHLAND RD

GARDEN HWY

HUNN RD

LINCOLN RD

CIVIC CENTER BLVD

BUTTE HOUSE RD

CHURCH ST
C ST

PEASE RD

GRAY AVE

JONES RD

BRIDGE ST

THARP RD

EL MARGARITA RD

SHASTA ST

FRANKLIN RD

ALMOND ST

WOODWARD ST

SUNSWEET BLVD

STABLER LN

ORANGE ST

HARTER RD

STAFFORD WAY

CLARK AVE
HWY 20

PERCY AVE
HWY 99

LORWOOD DR

RAILROAD AVE

SECOND ST
B ST

E HILLCREST AVE

ROCCA WAY

OLIVE ST

BLEV NI RD

QUEENS AVE

MAGNOL IADR

RED WOOD WAY

RA N DOLPH DR

DEERFIELD DR

CYPRESS DR

MAGNOL AI WAY

JUDY WAY

LA ENTRADA WAY

CAMELIA WAY

FORBES AVE

PORTOLA VALLEY RD

MIL E SAVE

LONG ST

CRESTMONT AVE

B RI M NI GTON DR

P NI E WAY

BUCK NI GHA M DR

MORTON ST

BRE NTW OOD D R

BUTTE VISTA LN

HOOPER RD

CORNWELL AVE

DOROTHY LN

APRIL LN

JODI DR

YORKTOWN DR

SERENA CT

MARKET ST

MILL CREEK WAY

S BARRETT RD TEESDALE RD
A ST

COLUSA FRONTAGE RD EB ON

MONTE AVE

MESSINA DR

MARCIA AVE

RYAN DR

HARTER PRKWY

LITTLE JOHN RD

JOHN TEE DR

TULY PKWY

MARINER LOO P

PONDEROSA CT

E ONSTOTT FRTG RD

FAIRMAN ST

ROMERO ST

M APLE AVE

CHESTNUT ST

JESSICA DR
HWY 20 RAMP OFF

PARK AVE

PAYNE CT

YOLO ST

FLORAIN DR

KELLEEN DR

WALNUT ST

WI LD RIVER DR

R VI ER BEND CT

DEL PRADA WAY

PH LI L PI S RD

LA B REA WAY

BUCHANAN RD

NORTHCROSSST

CONSTITUTION DR

NANTUCKET WAY

CAM NI O CORTEZ

CAPISTRANO ST

PERALTA ST

LAREDO ST

ZAMORA ST
JAN CT

BEUTLER DR

JOANN WAY

HAWK CT

MONROE DR

CARTAGENA DR

MYKONOS CT

STABLER PARK DR

JANICE WAY

HERITAGE DR

WHYLER RD

LOANOR DR

CHASITY WAY

TRES PICOS DR

SYLV AI WAY

DEL LAGO

ARDEN AVE

MONTCLAI R DR

EL VERANO WAY

PARC WEST DR

PORTOFINO DR

RUTH AVE

KLAMATH LN

CAMINO DEL FLORES

FRANKLIN AVE

JAMIE DR

EL I CT

PEBBLE BEACH DR

HOLLY TREE DR

EL SOBRANTE CT

JOHN DR

HUNJI DR

RONALD WAY

BRUNDY CT

BOGUE RD

A UGUSTA LN

DORCAS CT

JOHN FREEMONT WAY

RAPID W ATER WAY

NORWICH WAY

K RISTINA MILLE RDR
CLEOCT

BERKSHIRE DR

PICO CT

JEFFERSON AVE

S LAWRENCE AVE

ANDROSS AVE

DUKE CT

AYLOR AVE

LASK DR

COL USA F RONTAGE RAMP ON SUTTER ST

HARDIAL CT

ALLENWAY

MILLER RD

LA GRANDE AVE

MANCHESTER WAY

RIVER OAKS DR

HOWARD DR

SEI NNA WAY

ANTHONY WAY

MA RINER WAY

FIRENZE CT

BARRINGTON DR

NEWPORT DR

TEEGARDEN AVE

PARIS WAY

FRUITVALE AVE

NICK CT

LAKE DR

ALICIA CT

CREST DR

HOLMES DR

WHITE OAK DR

BETTYCT

RAI ESTATES CT

TAMARACK DR

R ANCHO WAY

SANTORINI CT

HAC EI NDA CT

SANTA BARBARA WAY

REG ENCY WAY

JONES ST

MAR NI A DR

PLUMAS CT

CREST CT

MARIPOSA DR

OLEANDER DR

PLUM CT

AMARPAL CT

CORSICA DR

W JOSEPH ST

EL DORA DO LN

EVERESTCT

WOODHAVEN DR

VERANO CT

BARBARA WAY
DOVECT

LIBBYL N

EL SERE NO CT

ABBOTT WAY

GREENBRIAR CT

SAMUEL DR

QUAIL CT

COLUSA FRONTAGE RD

RACHELCT

NORTHF EI LD CT

PORTSMOUTH DR

CORTEZ CT

GEEBEE WAY

ALBATROSS AVE

FRANQUETTE DR

CAPRI DR

KEYSER ST

ANNA DR

BERNARD DR

OAKBROO KDR

EDW NI DR

LYNELL CT

WOODSIDE DR

SANBORN RD

INDUSTRIAL CT

F FI HT ST W B SUTTER ST OF F

PEL CI AN PL

LESSEY DR

ROYO RANCHERO RD

WHISPERING OAKS DR
COY DR

SLEEPY DR

SOUTH W IND DR
BAY CT

KYLI ECT

LAMBERT CT

DEL NORTE AVE

JASON CT

SAN NICCOLO DR

AN TI A WAY

ZUPAN WAY

CEMETARY WA
C
Y

ENTER ST

KENSINGTON WAY

JOHNATHA N D R

MARIAH DR

PLUMAS BLVD

ARBOR WAY

CHARLOTTE AVE

LORRIE WAY

MADDEN CT

BUNCE CT

MALAGA CT

PEARSALL WAY

SA NI T JAMES CT

BROWN AVE

REEVES AVE

LORAWAY

OHLEYER RD

WILDFLOWER CIR

ORCHARD ST

CRISP DR

JEFFREY DR

DEBBIE LN

ESPLANADE WAY

BRISTOLCT

B RI CHWOOD CT

STARLITE LN

EL ZI ABETH LN

LEXINGTON CT

SESSLER D R

ROOSEVELT RD

BO BBY LN

RICHARDS WAY

JUDITH CT

BIGOAKSDR

DOMA NI WAY

EDEN WAY

ANDREW DR

RICE WAY

GURJ WAY

YOUNGS LN

PERKINS WAY

DEAN DR

SERENA DR

HONOR OAK DR

REDHAVEN AVE

MILTON DR

LAUREL DR

TRUE RD

JORI CT

BRIAN DR

TEAKWOOD DR

NORTHGATE DR

MC CUNE AVE

RAMERIZ DR

PAMELA CT

BILLIEA NN DR

SAINT ANDREWS DR

PHEASANT DR

LEWIS AVE

SEVILLA CT

GREENGATE ST

WOODLAND DR

MAIN ST

SARAH CT

DAVE PL

SANDPIPER DR

JENNIFER LN

N HARD NI G RD

MANZANITA WAY

NI DER LN

TRACY DR

OAKVIEW DR

PEACH TREE LN

EM ILY LN

PALORAAVE

PATTY DR

TWINS WAY

ELLIOT DR

GILL ILAND DR

CRES W ELL DR

GREGORY DR

GROUSE WAY

JOSEPHENE WAY AL CI AI DR

WILLOW C R EEK DR

CARMELITA DR

COUNTRYSIDE DR

SPYGLASS DR
BAY DR

COTTON ROSSER WAY

NORTH POINT DR

BARWICK WAY

LANCASTER WAY

CYNDA LN

BRADLEY ESTATES DR

DARROUGH DR

DELONE DR

PATRICIA DR

TOYON WAY

NADEAN DR

IMPERIAL WAY

OAKWOOD DR

KATHLEEN WAY

LAPALMA

YO RKDR

THERESA WAY

NANCY CT

THOMAS DR SCIROCCODR

NINAWAY

RICH LN

MICHAEL WAY

MANN DR

WINSLOW DR

CAMINO DEL ORO

ROSEWOOD DR

KIMBALL AVE

SOMERSET WAY

PROVENCE DR

VALLEY VIEW DR

TIMOTHY LN

KENNEDY DR

OLIVER DR

ESTATES DR

MESA VERDE

ADELI NEST

ZACHARY WAY

CAMELL AI LN

SW ARNCT

WILLOW GLEN DR

NORTHFIELD DR

ROSE LN

DAN EI L DR

KRISTIN CT

JOSEPH S T

TRAD EWIND DR

CUMMINGS CT

GLENW AY

MEAD O W AVE

CURR EI R WAY

RUSHING ST

SIERRA VISTA DR

MELINDA CT

QUAIL POINTE DR

FREDERICK ST

BAYWOODCT

MOORE AVE

SHERM AN CT

WHITNEY DR

GALAXYDR

MONTEREYAVE

SUNRISE CT

UPLAND DR

CALAVERAS CT

WOODLEAFDR

BEECHWOOD ST

NELDA CT

N PALORA AVE

NEIL DR

E TABER AVE

WOODBRIDGE AVE CENTRAL AVE

LORETTACT

N WALTON AVE

LASSEN BLVD

OAK HOLLOW

BRYN MAWR DR

MALTA DR

KILEY AVE

RIO VISTA

BAPTI ST LN

HEIKEN WAY

DORMA N AVE

S HARDING RD

IDA WAY

NAUTILUS CT

BROMLEY AVE

WINDSOR DR

FREMONT WAY
MIA LP

VOBORIL AVE
ELM ST

GIBSO N AVE

MART NI CT

PETTY CT

HUNT ST

GRANT WAY

PEPPERWOOD DR

FRAN CT

ASHLEY WAY

DENNIS WAY

DERAE CT

MC RAE WAY

SHEENA CT

S NI DUSTR AI L DR

BRYAN WAY

RI C KEY DR

SPIVAAVE

BENNETT WAY
SUTTE RSTHWY 20W B OFF

CARLOTTAWAY

BUTTE ST

LA MANTIA DR

HAWTHORNE ST

SAMUEL JAMES CT

ROWEAVE

UNIVERSITY AVE

COLIN CT

CHR SI T FI ER LN

CANDACE CT

KENDALL CT

ROB NI SON AVE

HERBERTCT
BAL CT

KELTON WAY

POPPY LN

MALKIT CT

PER WI NI KLE L N

SL OSSAVE

SATORI WAY

CLA RO CT

SHAY WAY

BENTON DR

VER ONICA CT

LYLE CT

YOLANDA DR

DEBBIE WAY

CEDAR WAY

LINDEN ST

MARK THOM AS DR

WILLOWBROOK DR

GARY DR

RANDY WAY

JORDAN RD

MICH CT

TRAVIS CT

MAD SI ON RD

LEEANNE AVE

SU N WESTDR

CLA RI E CT

MAYETTE CT

TORRY P NI E DR

F LETCHER W AY

MICHELLE DR

ASPEN DR

ALEMAR WAY

TRIFF WAY

SHERWOOD DR

NORMANDY CT

LILAC WAY

ROSE WAY

COURTHOUSE WAY

MARBLE CT

FORESTVIEW DR

WARD CT

GRANITE DR

BOYD ST

TEAL CT

PEBBLE CT

W ES TWOOD DR

WO ODCREST WAY

MOSSWOOD DR

TIM BERWOO D DR

KARNAIL CT

BRIG HTON WAY

HARDIAL DR

WILWICK WAY

CLYDE WAY

MATTHEW DR

SE SS LER PL

MURRAY CT

DOLORES DR

CENTURY PARK DR

ZEPHYR DR

YO RKSH RI E WAY

SKYLINE DR

CRESTMO NTCT
VI C T

CARL ISLE WAY

MARILYN AVE

MC COL LUM AVE

THOM PSO NAVE

LA GRANDE WAY

NORTHWOO DS DR

EMMET WAY

CHLOE CT

FORESTWOOD DR

SAINT FRANCIS WAY

STOKE RAVE

COMM ERCI AL DR

GIDDA LOOP

VON GELDERN WAY

FORREST LN

RAVI CT

MEHAR CT

VINE AVE

SUKH DR

QUEENSBURY WAY

EARNHARDTDR

KING AVE

AINSLEY AVE

SANTI CT

WOO DHURSTCT

BUENA VI STADR

PABLA CT

HARBANS DR

EMERSON ST

VALLEY CT

ORCHID WAY

ALTURAS ST

HIGHLAND AVE

ROCKHOLT WAY

COATS DR

NOTTINGHAM WAY

KEVIN WAY

FIPPINSAVE

G LENWOOD DR

LOUISE AVE

VIA JACINTO

GRANADA WAY

EONSTOTTFRONTAGE RD

LOUIS CT

SHAKEWOOD DR

PINEHURSTDR

BOWEN CT

JAMES LN

MORLEY AVE

SOMBRA CT

CAMDEN WAY

KLAMT CT

HARTLEY WAY

WILKIE WAY

JOY WAY

ELLIS WAY

ROSALIND AVE

W ONSTOTT FRTG RD

LYNN WAY

AARON DR

MORGAN WAY

NICOLAS DR

LA RABYN WAY

TEESDALE CT

DONA WAY

POOLE BLVD SAN GI MIGNANO DR

LOU ELLA LN

MA JORCA DR

CL NI T WAY

MCKINLEY RD

EVERGREEN WAY

PARC EAST DR

TOMBI WAY

W ONSTOTT FRONTAGE RD

RIDGE W AY

OJI WAY

EL GRANERO WAY

KIRA CT

TOWN SQUARE

SAM RIDE R WAY

JOHN WAY NE DR

CHELSEA PL

CARRIAGE SQ

OHLSON ST

MEADOWLARK WAY

DONALD CT

DOWNIE ST

SCOTT ST

CARROLL ST

LORRAINE WAY

COLE CT

BRANDY W NI E DR

WILSON AVE

TOLEDO ST

LIZANNE DR

CASE CT

MELAN EI LN

DEBRA LN

STARR DR

LYNNWOOD DR

NORTH RIDGE DR

HILLVIEW DR

COBBLESTONE CT

KEAN AVE

OXFORD CT

STONEY DR

EASTCREST CT

TURIN DR

CALAIS DR

BUTTE BEND LN

MAYFAIR AVE

ROLLING ROCK CT

BANDY WAY
RAJ CT

GRAYSTONE CT

MC CALL AVE

MALICK AVE

JESSIE AVE

DEL AMO DR

TABER AVE

KRENTZ LN

CAROLINA AVE

HOL LYAVE

JEWELL AVE

PRINCESS ST

CAMPBELL WAY
S
B
P
R
R
O
U
O
CE WAY
KS AVE

PAGEAVE

PALM AVE

PLAZA WAY

BRANDSTATTAVE

WILLOW WAY

GORDONW AY

PAULA DR

EL ENCINO WAY

KELLI DR

HETHER NI GTON C RI

BE CKY LN

LYNCHBURG DR

SAVANNAH DR

LAMON W AY

TIERRA BUENA RD

B RAY T ON LP

MELBA ST

G REE N WIC H CIR

EPLEY DR

ELMER AVE

CENTER DR

N LAWRENCE AVE

WOODRIDGE CT

WINDWA RD WAY

WHITE WATER WAY

CHANDLER WAY

MICHIGAN ST

COURTYARD WAY

WOODWORTH AV
S
E

TO NEGATE D R

ATWOOD DR

LA RAMADA

HAZEL AVE

SPENCER LN

TRINITY AVE

SHARON DR

MAYFLOWER WAY

KARENDR

BELL AVE

STAPLE DR

HARKEY WAY

TANGLEWOOD CT

STEVEN WAY

ALFRED WAY

SIERRA AVE

BURNS DR

SEAGULL DR

FRANCIS WAY

RED BUD LN

KNIGHTS ROW

BIRD ST

C TI RUS DR

HASSETT AVE

JULIE DR

GENEVA AVE

N BARRETT RD

WENDELL WAY

DUSTIN DR

STEWART WAY

ANNEKA LN

PUTMAN AVE

VILLA VISTA AVE

LA CASA AVE

MADRONE DR

INDUSTRIAL DR

BUTTE AVE

CLINTON ST

SUPP RD

JACOB DR

SEQUOIA DR

EASTWIND DR

VERNON AVE

BANCROFT AVE

BRIAR LN

BEYMER LOOP

REBECCA DR

CELESTIA L WAY
QUEENS AVE SB 99 ON

FIFTH ST

MIRADA CIR

WIL DER AVE

GEARY CIR
99 SB QUEENS AVE OFF
ART DR

DELMONTE AVE
QUEENS AVE 99 NB ON

ANNETTE WAY
99 NB QUEENS AVE OFF

HEATHER DR

ECKHART RD

WINSHIP RD

FRUITRIDGE RD

MONROE RD

ROBERTDR

CASITA DR

CASA LOMA WAY

LA COLINA LN

WILLIAMS WAY

MC MULLEN AVE

REGENT LOOP

HAYNE AVE

MELTON DR

KENNY DR

ONSTOTT FRTG RD

ROSEMARY LN

FIFTH ST BRIDGE ST WB OFF

DE LLE DR

HILLCREST AVE

VETERAN S ME MO R AI

RD L ADAMS RD

CASSIDY AVE

ORO GRANDE ST

K MI BERLY DR

PARK VIE W AVE

YOUNG RD

MC KEEHAN DR

VILLAAVE

HELEN AVE

SPIRIT DR

GABRIEL AVE

REDDING AVE

S GEORGE WASH NI GTON BLVD
PERCY
AV E
Lighting & Landscape
Maintenance District No.6
Zones of Benefit

QUEENS AVE

S WALTON AVE

CLARK AVE

GRAY AVE

BUTTE HOUSE RD

FRANKLIN AVE

WESTERN PKWY

SUNSWEET BLVD

N WALTON AVE

PLUMAS ST

ROYO RANCHERO RD

RICHLAND RD

LINCOLN RD

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

OHLEYER RD

SHANGHAI BEND RD

HARTER PKWY

THARP RD

HOOPER RD

TIERRA BUENA RD

STABLER LN

RAILROAD AVE

LIVE OAK BLVD

BRIDGE ST

S GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD

GRAY AVE

LINCOLN RD

CLARK AVE

FRANKLIN RD

PEASE RD

GARDEN HWY

BOGUE RD
Highway
Highway 20
Highway 99 Highway 99
8 Legend
CityLimit_Dummy
Maintenance Districts
µ

Page 359 of 403 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 360 of 403 ends

DISTRICT 2-6 PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS
District Zone of Benefit
FY 2022-23
Proposed Levy
Rate ($)
Change From
Previous Year
($)
Maximum
Levy Rate
Allowed ($)
2 A $597.86 ($4.62) $647.54
3 A $121.16 $3.52 $184.13
A $265.06 $0 $482.12
B $265.06 $0 $652.92
C $265.06 $0 $396.17
4 D $265.06 $0 $354.95
A $156.26 ($48.56) $234.92
B $76.28 $2.92 $78.86
C_1-9 $170.26 $40.02 $170.26
C_10 $110.28 $7.66 $110.29
D $159.52 $38.56 $233.80
E $96.56 $6.72 $96.56
F $129.02 $11.62 $189.97
G $59.38 $4.12 $59.39
H_1-8 $38.16 $2.66 $38.16
H_9 $84.22 $5.87 $84.22
I $80.02 $5.56 $80.03
J $154.52 $37.36 $214.42
K 1-17 $240.16 $11.44 $303.37
K_18 $250.82 $22.10 $400.28
5 L $141.40 $9.84 $141.40
A_1 $305.15 $0.89 $327.02
A_2 $305.15 $0.89 $327.02
A_3 $305.15 $0.89 $327.02
B_1 $525.80 $36.57 $525.81
6 B_2 $483.12 $33.62 $483.13

Page 361 of 403 ends

District Zone of Benefit
FY 2021-22
Proposed Levy
Rate ($)
Change From
Previous Year
($)
Maximum
Levy Rate
Allowed ($)
B_3 $332.36 $23.12 $332.36
B_4 $1,754.12 $122.08 $1,754.12
B_5 $0.00 $0.00 $501.18
B_6 $96.64 $6.74 $96.94
B_7 $96.64 $6.74 $96.64
B_8 $220.96 $15.38 $220.96
B_9 $437.44 $30.44 $437.45
B_10 $144.64 $10.08 $144.64
B_12 $166.70 $11.60 $166.70
B_13 $151.38 $10.54 $151.39
B_14 $171.04 $11.89 $171.04
B_15 $57.00 $3.96 $57.01
6 C_1 $535.66 $37.26 $535.67

Page 362 of 403 ends

Agenda Item 20

CITY OF YUBA CITY

STAFF REPORT
Date: August 16, 2022
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;Honorable Chairperson and Directors to the Successor Agency to the Yuba City Redevelopment Agency From: Administration Department
Presentation By: Diana Langley, City Manager
Summary
Subject: Declaration of Surplus Land – Successor Agency to the Yuba City Redevelopment Agency Properties
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution declaring certain Successor Agency-owned properties to be surplus land and directing the City Manager to follow the procedures set forth in the Surplus Land Act for the sale of such properties
Fiscal Impact: Proceeds from the sale of the property will go to the State. The City shall receive reimbursement for any costs incurred to sell the properties Purpose:

Declare certain Successor Agency-owned properties as surplus land pursuant to the Surplus Land Act (Gov. Code §§ 54220-54232), and to offer such surplus land for sale, and initiate a sale process for such exempt surplus land.

Council's Strategic Goal:

This item supports Council's goal of fiscal responsibility as the disposition of the properties will allow them to be developed in the future, thereby increasing the property values and property tax collected from the properties.

Background:

Based on a 2011 California Supreme Court decision, all redevelopment agencies in California were dissolved as of February 1, 2012. As a result, all redevelopment agencies were required to dissolve and transfer any assets and liabilities to “Successor Agencies” that would bring to a close the redevelopment agencies’ business matters. On January 10, 2012, the City Council elected to become the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Yuba City. In addition, there is a seven-member Oversight Board that is responsible for the approval and implementation of the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) and the Long Range Property Management Plan.

The Long Range Property Management Plan was prepared in 2015 by Fraser & Associates and identified eight (8) existing Successor Agency real property assets and set forth a strategy for the

Page 363 of 403 ends

appropriate transfer and disposition of such assets. Three (3) of the properties have since been sold, leaving five (5) remaining properties for disposal.

The Surplus Land Act (Act) governs the disposition of land owned by the Successor Agency that is determined to be no longer necessary for the Successor Agency’s use. This definition includes land held in the Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund and land that has been designated in the long-range property management plan as for sale or for future development. In 2019, Governor Newsom signed into law AB 1486, which significantly expanded the procedural requirements under the Act which a local agency must adhere to prior to selling or leasing properties it owns to a private party (and in some cases, another governmental agency). The legislation is intended to address California’s shortage of affordable housing and impacts existing practices, adds new reporting requirements, and subjects agencies to penalties for non-compliance in certain circumstances. AB 1486 went into effect January 1, 2020.

The procedural requirements for disposal of Surplus Land under the Act pursuant to AB 1486 are as follows:

1. Surplus land is now defined to mean essentially all land owned by a city, successor agency, housing authority, joint powers authority, and other local agencies. Prior to any sale or lease of property, a local agency must formally declare land as either “surplus land” or “exempt surplus land” pursuant to a resolution and supported by written findings. The definition of “exempt surplus land” includes properties that are less than 5,000 sq. ft. in area, land that a local agency exchanges for another property necessary for the agency’s use, land transferred to another local, state, or federal agency (for that agency’s use), land that is subject to recorded covenants (not imposed by the agency) that would make housing a prohibited use, among other factors. If the land has been declared as exempt, the agency need not comply with the following procedural requirements, however, the agency must send the resolution to the Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) prior to disposition.

2. Prior to selling or leasing any surplus land or even entering into negotiations for the sale/lease of surplus land with a prospective transferee, a local agency must first offer the property for sale or lease to a “housing sponsor” for affordable housing development by issuing a notice of availability (NOA). The term “housing sponsor” generally means an affordable housing developer (who has registered with HCD).

3. In addition to sending a NOA to housing sponsors for surplus land, a local agency must also send a NOA to any park or recreation department or regional park authority with jurisdiction over the area, school districts (if the land is suitable for school facilities), and the State Resources Agency (SRA), for purposes of park, recreation, or school facility development.

4. Any responding entity to the NOA (i.e., a housing sponsor, park or recreational department, school district or SRA) (Responding Entity) must notify the agency of its interest in purchasing or leasing the land within 60 days following receipt of the NOA.

5. If the price and terms cannot be agreed upon between the local agency and a Responding Entity within 90 days, the agency may then go forward to sell or lease the surplus land to a third party. However, the agency will still have to provide the HCD a description of the NOA sent and negotiations conducted with any Responding Entity.

6. In negotiations with any housing sponsor, the local agency must negotiate in good faith and cannot include deal terms that would reduce or disallow residential use of the site, even if it is not zoned for residential use (i.e., the housing sponsor must be able to pursue entitlements of the site for residential use). However, the Act does not subvert a City Council’s land use discretionary authority; ultimately, the City Council may deny a zone change or entitlement request in its discretion. In addition, the agency is not required to sell or lease the land for less than its fair market value.

7. Note that the housing sponsor need not propose a development of the surplus land for 100%

Page 364 of 403 ends

affordable units; the Act requires that they simply will agree to make available at least 25% of the total number of units developed on the property at an affordable housing cost or affordable rent.

8. If no housing sponsors respond to the NOA or if negotiations terminate and the land is later sold or leased to a market rate developer who builds more than 10 residential units, the Act requires that 15% must be sold or rented at an affordable cost or affordable rent to lower income individuals

9. The Act requires that the HCD must review the description submitted by the local agency pursuant to Section 5 and submit written findings to the agency within 30 days as to whether any process violations have occurred. If HCD does not respond within the 30-day time period, the local agency is not subject to any penalty under the Act. (These provisions take effect January 1, 2021 – so it is likely that the HCD will not provide such findings.)

10. Any violations of the Act are subject to harsh penalties; between 30 percent and 50 percent of the final sale price for the property. The HCD, Attorney General, and any beneficially interested entity may bring an action to enforce the Act.

A list and map of Successor Agency-owned surplus properties are provided as attachments.

Analysis:

Staff is requesting that the Successor Agency formally designate and declare certain Successor Agency-owned properties as “surplus land”. As noted above, under the Act, surplus property is defined as land owned by the Successor Agency that is determined to be no longer necessary for the Successor Agency’s use. Staff has reviewed the properties and determined that none qualify as exempt under the Act. The proposed process dispose or sell these properties is as follows:
 Select a real estate broker to assist the Successor Agency to manage the offering, negotiating, and potentially selling the surplus land, as staff does not typically manage such sales of property, however staff shall ensure it complies with the process for disposal of the properties as required by the Surplus Land Act.
 Issue a NOA and solicit proposals from housing sponsors and other interested parties for the purchase/lease of the land, and proceed with the process required under AB 1486 as outlined above. In connection therewith, staff shall obtain appraisals for the properties.  Any proposals received following the NOA will be negotiated by staff and later presented to the Successor Agency and any resulting proposed contract for sale with a Responding Entity will require the approval of HCD as well as the Successor Agency and Oversight Board.  If no proposals are received following the NOA, proposals for acquisition with private parties shall be negotiated by staff and later presented to the Successor Agency and any resulting contract for sale will require the approval of the Successor Agency and Oversight Board.

There is known environmental contamination at one of the properties (442 B Street), and the status of the other properties is unknown as the Successor Agency has not initiated any environmental assessments. The properties shall be sold/leased “as is”, making no guarantees as to the ability to develop the particular site.

The Successor Agency’s declaration that the properties are surplus land is in compliance with statutory requirements under the Act and is not part of a project that has been identified, designed or funded. No physical change in the environment would occur. The action is an administrative action that would not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and is not a project as defined in CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4); 15060(c)(3)).

Page 365 of 403 ends

Fiscal Impact:

Any proceeds from the sale of the surplus properties will be provided to the State taxing entities, but the City (acting as Successor Agency) shall request reimbursement for any costs associated with the disposal of the properties (such as escrow, title, legal, or administrative costs).

Alternatives:

Do not proceed with declaring any of the properties as surplus and explore other options for utilization of the properties.

Recommendation:

Adopt a Resolution declaring certain Successor Agency-owned properties to be surplus land and directing the City Manager to follow the procedures set forth in the Surplus Land Act for the sale of such properties.

Attachments:

1. Attachment 1 - Long Range Property Management Plan

2. Attachment 2 - Successor Agency Surplus Property List

3. Attachment 3 - Successor Agency Surplus Property Map

4. Attachment 4 - Resolution - Successor Agency Surplus Properties Prepared By: Submitted By:

Diana Langley
City Manager
Diana Langley
City Manager

Page 366 of 403 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 367 of 403 ends

FA FRASER & ASSOCIATES
5HGHYHORSPHQWDQG)LQDQFLDO&RQVXOWLQJ
+ROPILUWK&RXUW  3KRQH






5RVHYLOOH&$
  )$;






/RQJ5DQJH3URSHUW\0DQDJHPHQW3ODQ
Successor Agency to the Yuba City Redevelopment Agency
<XED&LW\5HGHYHORSPHQW3URMHFW$UHD
June 2015
3 Packet Pg. 9
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 368 of 403 ends

FA Fraser & Associates
Yuba City Successor Agency Page 1
Property Management Plan June 2015
, %$&.*5281'
3XUVXDQWWR+HDOWKDQG6DIHW\&RGHVHFWLRQV
H
DQG
D
D6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\
LVUHTXLUHGWRGLVSRVHRIDOODVVHWVDQGSURSHUWLHVRIDIRUPHUUHGHYHORSPHQWDJHQF\WKDW ZHUH IXQGHGE\WD[LQFUHPHQWUHYHQXHVRIWKHVXEMHFWGLVVROYHGUHGHYHORSPHQW$JHQF\ 7KLV GRFXPHQWLVLQWHQGHGWR DGGUHVV 6HFWLRQ 

D
 DQG 

D
 RI$VVHPEO\
%LOO
$%
DQGUHODWHGUHTXLUHPHQWVIRUSUHSDUDWLRQRID/RQJ5DQJH3URSHUW\ 0DQDJHPHQW 3ODQ
³3ODQ´
 UHODWHG WR WKH UHDO SURSHUW\ DVVHWV RI WKH IRUPHU 5HGHYHORSPHQW$JHQF\ RIWKH&LW\ RI<XED&LW\
³)RUPHU$JHQF\´
ZKLFKKDYHEHHQ
WUDQVIHUUHGWRWKH <XED&LW\ 6XFFHVVRU $JHQF\
³$JHQF\ RU 6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\´
7KH
3ODQ LGHQWLILHV H[LVWLQJ $JHQF\ UHDO SURSHUW\ DVVHWV HJ ODQG EXLOGLQJV HWF
 DQG VHWV
IRUWKD VWUDWHJ\ IRUWKHDSSURSULDWHWUDQVIHUDQGGLVSRVLWLRQRIVXFKDVVHWVLQDFFRUGDQFH ZLWKWKHSURYLVLRQVRI$%LQFOXGLQJUHFRPPHQGHGDFWLRQVWREHXQGHUWDNHQE\WKH <XED&LW\2YHUVLJKW%RDUGWRSRVLWLRQWKHVXEMHFWDVVHWVIRUGLVSRVLWLRQLQDORJLFDODQG V\VWHPDWLFPDQQHUVRDVWRHQKDQFHWKHGLVSRVLWLRQYDOXHRIWKHVXEMHFWDVVHWV ,, 352326('5($/3523(57<$66(775$16)(5$1'',6326,7,21 $&7,216
7KLV 3ODQ VHWV IRUWK D SURSRVHG VWUDWHJ\DQG SODQ IRUWUDQVIHUDQG GLVSRVLWLRQ RIFHUWDLQ LGHQWLILHG $JHQF\RZQHG UHDO SURSHUW\ DVVHWV ZLWKLQWKH&LW\ RI <XED&LW\&DOLIRUQLD +HDOWK 6DIHW\&RGHVHFWLRQV
H
DQG
D
UHTXLUHWKDWWKH6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\
GHVLJQDWHHDFKRIWKHIRUPHU$JHQF\RZQHGUHDOSURSHUW\DVVHWVE\RQHRIWKHIROORZLQJ

FDWHJRULHV

 7UDQVIHUIRUJRYHUQPHQWXVH
 6DOHRIWKHSURSHUW\
 7UDQVIHUIRUIXWXUHXVH
 8VHRI3URSHUW\WRIXOILOODQHQIRUFHDEOHREOLJDWLRQ 3 Packet Pg. 10
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 369 of 403 ends

FA Fraser & Associates
Yuba City Successor Agency Page 2
Property Management Plan June 2015
,QFOXGHGDV$WWDFKPHQW$LVDSURSHUW\GDWDWDEOHGHVFULELQJWKH UHDO SURSHUW\DVVHWVRI WKH6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\)RUHDFKRIWKHVHVXEMHFWSURSHUWLHVWKHWDEOHLQFOXGHVEXWLVQRW OLPLWHGWRWKHIROORZLQJLQIRUPDWLRQ

 'DWHRISXUFKDVHYDOXHRISURSHUW\

HVWLPDWHG
DWWLPHRISXUFKDVH

 3XUSRVHRIWKHSURSHUW\DFTXLVLWLRQ

 3DUFHOGDWDLQFOXGLQJDGGUHVVVL]H]RQLQJ*HQHUDO3ODQGHVLJQDWLRQ 
 (VWLPDWHRIWKHFXUUHQWYDOXHRUDSSUDLVHGYDOXH

 (VWLPDWHRIUHYHQXHJHQHUDWHGIURPXVHRISURSHUW\DQGFRQWUDFWXDOUHTXLUHPHQWV HJ
OHDVHHWF


 $Q\KLVWRU\RIHQYLURQPHQWDOFRQWDPLQDWLRQDQGRUUHPHGLDWLRQ 
 'HYHORSPHQWSRWHQWLDOSODQQLQJREMHFWLYHV
DQG
 $Q\SUHYLRXVGHYHORSPHQWSURSRVDOVUHQWDORUOHDVHDJUHHPHQWVRWKHUFRQWUDFWV 7KHDERYHLQIRUPDWLRQLV IXUWKHUGHVFULEHGLQWKLV3ODQ$WWDFKPHQW%LQFOXGHVDVHWRI DHULDOPDSVIRUWKHSURSHUWLHVRZQHGE\WKH$JHQF\
$ 7UDQVIHURI5HDO3URSHUW\IRU*RYHUQPHQW8VH
7KHSURSHUW\OLVWHGLQ7DEOHEHORZLVSURSRVHGWREHWUDQVIHUUHGWRWKH&LW\RI<XED &LW\
³&LW\´

Table 1 – Properties to be Transferred for Government Use Property
No. APN Address Existing Use
7 A 52-380-019 442 B Street Town square and related right of way 3 Packet Pg. 11
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 370 of 403 ends

FA Fraser & Associates
Yuba City Successor Agency Page 3
Property Management Plan June 2015
3URSHUW\$LVDSDUWRISDUFHO
7KH&LW\LQWHQGVWRVXEGLYLGHWKHSDUFHOLQWR
WZRQHZSDUFHOV3URSHUW\$FRQWDLQVWKHSRUWLRQRIWKHSDUFHOWKDWLVLQSXEOLFXVHDQG LQFOXGHVWKH7RZQ6TXDUHLQFOXGLQJWKHIRXQWDLQDQGUHODWHGSXEOLFULJKWRIZD\$IWHU WKHSDUFHOVSOLW3URSHUW\$ZLOOFRQWDLQDSSUR[LPDWHO\VTXDUHIHHW % 'LVSRVLWLRQ
6DOH
RI5HDO3URSHUW\
7KH 3ODQ SURSRVHVWKDWWKH SURSHUWLHVOLVWHG EHORZ EH SRVLWLRQHG IRU GLVSRVLWLRQ E\WKH 6XFFHVVRU $JHQF\ DQG2YHUVLJKW%RDUG7KH SURSRVHG GLVSRVLWLRQ SODQ REMHFWLYHLVWR VHOOWKHVXEMHFWSURSHUWLHVIRUSULYDWHGHYHORSPHQWFRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKH&LW\*HQHUDO3ODQ DQG]RQLQJRUGLQDQFHODQGXVHGHVLJQDWLRQV7KHVDOHSURFHHGVQHWRIVDOHVFRVWVIURPWKH GLVSRVLWLRQ RI WKHVH SURSHUWLHV ZLOO EH VHQWWRWKH 6XWWHU&RXQW\ $XGLWRU&RQWUROOHU IRU GLVWULEXWLRQWRWKHWD[LQJHQWLWLHV
Table 2 – Properties Proposed for Disposition
Property
No. APN Address Existing Use
1 52-262-001 444 Colusa Street Vacant Lot
2 52-324-023 400 Bridge Street
Former Feather River Mill Site; proposed to
be sold to a private developer for mixed use
development
3 52-502-008 510 Boyd Street
Site is adjacent to Property No. 2; Agency
wants to pursue option of selling jointly with
Property No. 2
4 52-380-017 Wilbur and C Street Part of Town Center Development; Agency intends to sell to developer
5 52-401-014 454 Stevens Ave. Part of Town Center; Agency wants to pursue option of selling jointly with Property No. 4
6 52-380-025 433 Plumas Blvd. Vacant Parcel that is part of Town Center 7B 52-380-019 442 B Street Vacant Parcel that is part of Town Center 8 53-194-013 Percy Ave Vacant Parcel
3URSHUW\1R&ROXVD6WUHHW
3 Packet Pg. 12
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 371 of 403 ends

FA Fraser & Associates
Yuba City Successor Agency Page 4
Property Management Plan June 2015
3URSHUW\1RVLWVDWWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQRI3OXPDV6WUHHWDQG&ROXVD$YHQXH7KHSDUFHOLV GLUHFWO\ DGMDFHQWWR D IURQWDJH URDG IURP&ROXVD$YHQXH ,W ZDV RULJLQDOO\ DFTXLUHG RQ 0D\LQRUGHUWRDVVLVWLQWKHLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRIWKH&HQWUDO&LW\6SHFLILF3ODQLQ UHJDUGVWRLPSURYHGWUDIILF FLUFXODWLRQ 7KH SURSHUW\LV ]RQHG& 7KH $JHQF\ KDV DQ RIIHUWRSXUFKDVH3URSHUW\1RWRWKHRZQHURIWKHDGMDFHQWVLWHDWLWVIDLUPDUNHWYDOXH DVGHWHUPLQHGE\DQDSSUDLVDO
3URSHUW\1R±%ULGJH6WUHHW
)URPWKH
¶VWKURXJKWKLVSURSHUW\KDGEHHQRFFXSLHGDWRQHWLPHRUDQRWKHUE\ WKH5LYHU0LOOVWRUH
DPLOODQGIHHGVWRUH
DWUDLQVWDWLRQZLWKUDLOURDGOLQHVDQGVSXUV
WKH'LDPRQG0DWFKFRPSDQ\6LHUUD/XPEHUDUHF\FOLQJFHQWHUDQGYDULRXVRWKHUXVHV 7KH)RUPHU$JHQF\DFTXLUHGWKHSURSHUW\IRU
RQ2FWREHULQRUGHUWR
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
7KH &LW\ HQWHUHG LQWR DQ DJUHHPHQW WR QHJRWLDWH H[FOXVLYHO\ ZLWK 1R\DQ 3URSHUWLHV

'HYHORSHU
LQ6HSWHPEHU7KHUHVXOWRIWKHQHJRWLDWLRQSURFHVVZDVWKHSUHSDUDWLRQ RID0HPRUDQGXPRI8QGHUVWDQGLQJ
028
EHWZHHQWKH&LW\DQGWKH'HYHORSHUWKDWZDV
DSSURYHGLQ1RYHPEHU7KH028FDOOVIRUWKH&LW\DQGWKH'HYHORSHUWRSUHSDUHD 'LVSRVLWLRQDQG'HYHORSPHQW$JUHHPHQW
''$
 XQGHUZKLFKWKHWHUPVDQGFRQGLWLRQV
RIWKHVDOHRIWKHVLWHZLOOEHGHWHUPLQHG8QWLOWKLV3ODQLVFRPSOHWHGDQGDSSURYHGWKH $JHQF\DQG&LW\ZLOOQRWEHDEOHWRFRPSOHWHWKH''$DQGGLVSRVHRIWKHSURSHUW\7KH 3 Packet Pg. 13
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 372 of 403 ends

FA Fraser & Associates
Yuba City Successor Agency Page 5
Property Management Plan June 2015
LQWHQWRIWKH&LW\DQGWKH'HYHORSHULVWRVHHDPL[HGXVHGHYHORSPHQWFRPSOHWHGRQWKH VLWH&XUUHQWO\WKHVLWHLV]RQHGIRULQGXVWULDOXVHV 3URSHUW\1R±%R\G6WUHHW
7KLVSURSHUW\DGMRLQV3URSHUW\1RWRWKHHDVW7KH)RUPHU$JHQF\DFTXLUHGWKHVLWHIRU RQ2FWREHUIRUSXUSRVHVRIUHGHYHORSLQJWKHVLWHLQFRQMXQFWLRQZLWK 3URSHUW\ 1R  7KH VLWH FRQWDLQV  VTXDUH IHHW WKDW LV FXUUHQWO\ ]RQHG IRU FRPPHUFLDORIILFHXVH7KH$JHQF\LVSURSRVLQJWKDWWKHSURSHUW\EHVROGDVSDUWRIWKH ''$ SURFHVV WR WKH 'HYHORSHU IRU 3URSHUW\ 1R  7KH WZR SURSHUWLHV FDQ WKHQ EH UHGHYHORSHGWRJHWKHULQWRDPL[HGXVHGHYHORSPHQWVLWH 3URSHUW\1R:LOEXU &6WUHHW
7KLVSURSHUW\ZDVDFTXLUHGLQWKH2FWREHU

DVSDUWRIWKH)RUPHU$JHQF\¶VSXUFKDVH
RIWKHDEDQGRQHG<XED&LW\VWHHOVLWHZKLFKFRQVLVWHGRIWRWDODFUHV7KH)RUPHU $JHQF\DFTXLUHGWKHHQWLUHVLWHIRUPLOOLRQ7KLVSURSHUW\FRQWDLQVVTXDUH IHHWDQGWKHSURUDWHGSXUFKDVHYDOXHLVHVWLPDWHGDW 7KHVLWHZDVVXEVHTXHQWO\
FOHDUHGDQGLQIUDVWUXFWXUHLQVWDOOHG7KHHQWLUHDUHDLVUHIHUUHGWRDVWKH7RZQ&HQWHUVLWH 2YHUWKHSDVWWZHQW\WKUHH\HDUVSRUWLRQVRIWKHVLWHKDYHEHHQVROGIRUSULYDWH GHYHORSPHQW3URSHUW\1RUHSUHVHQWVRQHRIWKUHHUHPDLQLQJ7RZQ&HQWHUSDUFHOVWKDW DUHOHIWWREHVROG
,Q6HSWHPEHUWKHIRUPHU$JHQF\HQWHUHGLQWRDQDJUHHPHQWWRH[FOXVLYHO\QHJRWLDWH ZLWK0U'DYH1HZTXLVW0U1HZTXLVWLQWHQGVWREXLOGDFRQYHQWLRQDQGHYHQWFHQWHURQ WKHVLWH7KHSURSHUW\ZRXOGEHVROGDWIDLUPDUNHWYDOXH 3URSHUW\1R±6WHYHQV$YH
7KLVSURSHUW\ZDVDFTXLUHGE\WKH)RUPHU$JHQF\RQ1RYHPEHUIRU 7KHSURSHUW\ZKLFKLV  VTXDUH IHHWLV]RQHG UHVLGHQWLDO*LYHQLWVORFDWLRQRQWKH HGJHRIWKH7RZQ&HQWHUDUHDWKH$JHQF\LQWHQGVWRUH]RQHWKHSURSHUW\IRUFRPPHUFLDO XVHVDQGWKHQVHOOWKHSURSHUW\WRWKHGHYHORSHURI3URSHUW\1RZKRLQWHQGVWRXVHWKH 3 Packet Pg. 14
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 373 of 403 ends

FA Fraser & Associates
Yuba City Successor Agency Page 6
Property Management Plan June 2015
VLWH IRUSDUWRIWKHHYHQWFHQWHUGHYHORSPHQW7KHSURSHUW\ZRXOGEHVROGDWIDLUPDUNHW YDOXH
3URSHUW\1R±3OXPDV%OYG
7KLVSURSHUW\ZDVDOVRDFTXLUHGDVSDUWRIWKH7RZQ&HQWHUDFTXLVLWLRQLQ

ZLWKLWV
SURUDWHGDFTXLVLWLRQFRVW HVWLPDWHGDW 7KH SURSHUW\KDV XQGHUJRQHH[WHQVLYH HQYLURQPHQWDOFOHDQXSDQGZDVGHHPHGE\WKH&HQWUDO9DOOH\5HJLRQDO:DWHU4XDOLW\ &RQWURO %RDUG WR UHTXLUH QR IXUWKHU DFWLRQ 7KH SURSHUW\ LQFOXGHV D WRWDO RI  VTXDUH IHHW WKDW LV ]RQHG IRU FRPPHUFLDO  RIILFH GHYHORSPHQW7KH SURSHUW\ ZRXOG EH VROGDWIDLUPDUNHWYDOXH
3URSHUW\1R%±%6WUHHW
7KLVSURSHUW\ZDVDFTXLUHGDVSDUWRIWKH7RZQ&HQWHUDFTXLVLWLRQLQ

,WVSURUDWHG
DFTXLVLWLRQFRVWLVHVWLPDWHGDW
EDVHGRQWKHUHPDLQLQJSRUWLRQRI3URSHUW\
WKDWZLOOEHVROG,Q$XJXVWD3KDVH,(QYLURQPHQW6LWH$VVHVVPHQWZDVSUHSDUHG IRU WKH SURSHUW\ 7KH 3KDVH , $VVHVVPHQW LQGLFWHG WKDW WKHUH ZHUH VL[WHHQ UHFRJQL]HG HQYLURQPHQWDO FRQGLWLRQV LQFOXGLQJ SHVWLFLGH VSLOODJH DQG WKH SUHVHQFH RI DUVHQLF DQG OHDGLQWKHVXUIDFHVRLO%HIRUHWKHSURSHUW\FDQEHUHGHYHORSHGWKHVLWHZLOOQHHGWREH FOHDQHGXSThe cost for environmental cleanup will affect the potential sales price of the property and may require that the property be sold for a nominal amount. Although the estimated market value of the Property, as described later in this PMP, indicates a value of $566,062, this does not include any deductions for the cost of toxic cleanup. The cost to clean the site is not currently known, and so the Agency can only provide a ballpark sales price estimate of somewhere less than $566,062. The actual sales price could potentially be less than this. 7KH UHPDLQLQJ SURSHUW\ DIWHU WKH SXEOLF XVH SRUWLRQ IRU
3URSHUW\$LVVSOLWRII
FRQWDLQV
 VTXDUHIHHWDQGLV]RQHGFRPPHUFLDORIILFH
3URSHUW\1R±3HUF\$YHQXH
3 Packet Pg. 15
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 374 of 403 ends

FA Fraser & Associates
Yuba City Successor Agency Page 7
Property Management Plan June 2015
7KLV SURSHUW\ZDVDFTXLUHGRQ -XQH IRU7KHSDUFHOFRQWDLQV  VTXDUHIHHWDQGLV]RQHG&RPPHUFLDO2IILFH7KH$JHQF\LQWHQGVWRVHOOWKLVSDUFHOIRU IDLUPDUNHWYDOXH
,,, (67,0$7('9$/8(2)5($/3523(57<$66(76
$VSUHYLRXVO\GLVFXVVHGDQDSSUDLVDOZDVUHFHQWO\FRPSOHWHGIRU3URSHUWLHVDQG7KDW DSSUDLVDOVKRZHGWKDWWKHFRPELQHGPDUNHWYDOXHIRUERWKSURSHUWLHVZDV 7DEOHEHORZSUHVHQWVDQHVWLPDWHRISRWHQWLDOPDUNHWYDOXHRIWKH UHDOSURSHUW\DVVHWV EDVHG RQ DQ DSSUDLVDO WKDW ZDV SUHSDUHG LQ  IRU 3URSHUW\ 1R  7KH $JHQF\ KDV LQFUHDVHGWKDWYDOXHZKLFKHTXDOHGSHUVTXDUHIRRWE\DQDGGLWLRQDOSHUFHQWWR WDNH LQWR DFFRXQW SRWHQWLDOO\ FKDQJLQJ PDUNHW FRQGLWLRQV VLQFH  7KH LQIRUPDWLRQ SUHVHQWHGEHORZLVRQO\LQWHQGHGWRSURYLGHDQ³RUGHURIPDJQLWXGH´HVWLPDWHRISRWHQWLDO YDOXH DQGLV QRWLQWHQGHGWR SUHVHQW DFWXDO DSSUDLVHGPDUNHW YDOXH 7KH YDOXH HVWLPDWH DVVXPHVQRGHYHORSPHQWLPSHGLPHQWVZKLFKLVFOHDUO\QRWWKHFDVHIRU3URSHUWLHV GXH
WR VLWH VL]H DQG ORFDWLRQ
  DQG %
GXH WR WR[LF UHPHGLDWLRQ
  )RU 3URSHUW\  % WKH
$JHQF\ZLOO QHJRWLDWHWKH EHVW SULFHWKDWLV REWDLQDEOHDQGFRQVLVWHQWZLWKLWVDSSURYHG 3ODQV$FWXDODSSUDLVDOVZLOODOVRQHHGWREHSUHSDUHGIRUHDFKRIWKH3URSHUWLHVWKDWDUHWR EHVROG7KHSURFHHGVJHQHUDWHGIURPWKHGLVSRVLWLRQZLOOEHGLVWULEXWHGWR6XWWHU&RXQW\ IRU DOORFDWLRQWRWKH DSSOLFDEOHWD[LQJ HQWLWLHVLQ DFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKH SURYLVLRQV RI$% 
Table 3 – Estimated Current Market Value of Parcels
Property
No. APN Square Feet Estimated Value
1 52-262-001 4,791 $28,989
2 52-324-023 285,753 $1 *
3 52-502-008 42,688 $1*
4 52-380-017 47,480 $287,256
5 52-401-014 8,712 $52,708
3 Packet Pg. 16
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 375 of 403 ends

FA Fraser & Associates
Yuba City Successor Agency Page 8
Property Management Plan June 2015
6 52-380-016 107,157 $648,300
7A 52-380-019 60,548 $366,315
7B 52-380-019 93,564 $566,062
8 53-194-013 17,424 $105,415

&RPELQHGYDOXHIRUERWKSDUFHOVSHUDSSUDLVDO
,9 $3352$&+$1'352&(66)25',6326,7,212)3523(57,(6 3URSHUW\LVSURSRVHGWREHVROGWRWKHDGMDFHQWODQGRZQHU3URSHUWLHVDQGDUH SURSRVHGWREHVROGWRWKHGHYHORSHUVZKLFKDUHFXUUHQWO\XQGHUDQG(1$ZLWKWKH&LW\ )RUPHU$JHQF\7KH$JHQF\ZLOOQHJRWLDWHWKHWHUPVRIWKHVDOHVDJUHHPHQWVWKURXJKD GLVSRVLWLRQDQGGHYHORSPHQWDJUHHPHQW
7KHUHPDLQLQJUHDOSURSHUW\DVVHWVVKRZQRQ7DEOH
3URSHUWLHV%DQG
DERYHDUH
SODQQHGWREHRIIHUHGIRUVDOHWKURXJKD5HTXHVWIRU3URSRVDOVDQG2IIHU 5)32
SURFHVV
ZKLFKLV GHVFULEHG EHORZ  7KH SURSRVHG SUHGHYHORSPHQW DFWLYLWLHV RXWOLQHG EHORZ DUH LQWHQGHG WR EHWWHU SRVLWLRQ WKH SURSHUWLHV IRU VXFFHVVIXO DFTXLVLWLRQ  GHYHORSPHQW DQG HQKDQFHWKHSRWHQWLDOYDOXH

SURFHHGV
JHQHUDWHGIURPWKHVDOHRIVXFKSURSHUWLHV
 3UHGHYHORSPHQW$FWLYLWLHV
  7KHUHDUHD QXPEHU RI SUHGHYHORSPHQWDFWLYLWLHVWKDWWKH 6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\DQG 2YHUVLJKW%RDUGPD\RUPD\QRWWRGHFLGHWRXQGHUWDNHLQRUGHUWRDSSURSULDWHO\SRVLWLRQ WKHVXEMHFWUHDOSURSHUW\DVVHWVIRUGLVSRVLWLRQDQGSULYDWHGHYHORSPHQW7KHVHSRWHQWLDO DFWLYLWLHVFRXOGLQFOXGH

x 3UHSDULQJSUHOLPLQDU\WLWOHUHSRUWVWRGHWHUPLQHH[LVWLQJWLWOHFRQGLWLRQVLQUHODWLRQWR SRWHQWLDOGHYHORSPHQWRIWKHSURSHUWLHV

x &RPPLVVLRQLQJ DSSUDLVDO UHSRUWV RU EURNHU SULFH RSLQLRQ WR GHWHUPLQH DW SRWHQWLDO PDUNHWYDOXHRIWKHSURSHUWLHV

3 Packet Pg. 17
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 376 of 403 ends

FA Fraser & Associates
Yuba City Successor Agency Page 9
Property Management Plan June 2015
x 'HYHORSLQJ LQIRUPDWLRQ UHJDUGLQJ WKH SXEOLF LQIUDVWUXFWXUH FDSDFLW\ ZDWHU VHZHU
GUDLQDJHHWF

7KHGHFLVLRQRIWKH6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\DQG2YHUVLJKW%RDUGWRXQGHUWDNHVXFKDFWLYLWLHV ZRXOG EH GHSHQGHQW LQ SDUW RQ WKH DYDLODELOLW\ RI IXQGLQJ DQG ZKHWKHU WKHVH UHODWHG GLVSRVLWLRQ FRVWV ZRXOG EH DOORZHG E\ WKH 6WDWH 'HSDUWPHQW RI )LQDQFH DV HQIRUFHDEOH REOLJDWLRQVXQGHUWKH5236
 5HTXHVWIRU3URSRVDOVDQG2IIHUV
5)32
3URSRVDO
&LW\VWDIIXQGHUWKHGLUHFWLRQRIWKH6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\DQGWKH2YHUVLJKW%RDUGZLOO SUHSDUHDQGLPSOHPHQWD5HTXHVWIRU3URSRVDOVDQG2IIHU 5)32
SURFHVVIRUVHOHFWLRQRI
D SULYDWH GHYHORSPHQW WHDP
V
 WR DFTXLUH DQG GHYHORS WKH UHPDLQLQJ SURSHUWLHV $OO SURSHUWLHV ZLOO EH FRQVWUXFWHG FRQVLVWHQW ZLWK &LW\ *HQHUDO 3ODQ DQG UHODWHG ]RQLQJ RUGLQDQFH GHVLJQDWLRQV  7KH LQWHQW RI WKH 5)32 SURFHVV ZRXOG EH WR VHOHFW WKH PRVW TXDOLILHGEXVLQHVVDQGGHYHORSPHQWSDUWQHU
V
UHODWHGWRGLVSRVLWLRQDQGGHYHORSPHQWRI
WKH VXEMHFW SURSHUWLHV DQG UHVSHFWLYH EXVLQHVV RIIHUVWKDW SURYLGHWKH KLJKHVW DQG PRVW FHUWDLQ HFRQRPLF YDOXH DQG UHWXUQ IURP WKH GLVSRVLWLRQ RI WKH VXEMHFW SURSHUWLHV  7KH 5)32SURFHVVZRXOGDOORZWKHSURVSHFWLYHUHVSRQGHQWVWRWKH5)32WRVXEPLWDPDVWHU SURSRVDOIRUDOORIWKHSURSHUWLHVRURIIHUIRULQGLYLGXDOSDUFHOV 6XEVHTXHQWWR VHOHFWLRQ RI D SULYDWH GHYHORSHU
V
WKH$JHQF\ VKRXOGZRUNPXWXDOO\
ZLWKWKHVHOHFWHGSULYDWHGHYHORSHU
V
WRQHJRWLDWHWKHWHUPVDQGFRQGLWLRQVIRUGLVSRVLWLRQ RI WKH VXEMHFW SURSHUWLHV  7KHVH SURYLVLRQV VKRXOG EH QHJRWLDWHG GXULQJ DQ H[FOXVLYH QHJRWLDWLRQSHULRGDQGZRXOGEHHPERGLHGLQDSXUFKDVHDQGVDOHDJUHHPHQWEHWZHHQWKH 6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\DQGVHOHFWHGSULYDWHGHYHORSHU
V
ZLWKWKHUHYLHZDQGDSSURYDORIWKH
2YHUVLJKW%RDUG
 0DUNHWLQJDQG2XWUHDFK
3 Packet Pg. 18
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 377 of 403 ends

FA Fraser & Associates
Yuba City Successor Agency Page 10
Property Management Plan June 2015
7KHJRDORIDSURSRVHGPDUNHWLQJHIIRUWLVWRDWWUDFWKLJKTXDOLW\GHYHORSPHQWRQWKH VXEMHFWUHPDLQLQJUHDOSURSHUW\DVVHWVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKHDGRSWHG&LW\*HQHUDO3ODQDQG &LW\ =RQLQJ 2UGLQDQFH  :ULWWHQ PDUNHWLQJ LQIRUPDWLRQ IRU WKH SUHOLPLQDU\ RXWUHDFK HIIRUWVKRXOGLQFOXGHDEDVLFEURFKXUHWKDWGHVFULEHVWKHFKDUDFWHULVWLFVRIWKHVLWH V
DQG
WKH &LW\ JHQHUDO ODQG XVH SURYLVLRQV DQG DQ\ UHODWHG LQIRUPDWLRQ UHVXOWLQJ IURP WKH SUHGHYHORSPHQWDFWLYLWLHVGHVFULEHGDERYH
7KH SULPDU\ IRFXV RIWKH6XFFHVVRU$JHQF\¶VPDUNHWLQJHIIRUWV VKRXOGEHORFDODQG UHJLRQDO UHDO HVWDWH GHYHORSPHQW FRPSDQLHV WKDW KDYH TXDOLILFDWLRQV H[SHULHQFH DQG VXFFHVVIXOWUDFN UHFRUGVLQGHYHORSPHQWDQGRSHUDWLRQRIKLJKTXDOLW\FRPPHUFLDODQG RU UHVLGHQWLDO GHYHORSPHQW$SUHOLPLQDU\RXWUHDFKHIIRUW UHODWHGWRPDUNHWLQJRIWKHVH VLWHVVKRXOGLQFOXGH

PHHWLQJZLWKYDULRXVUHDOHVWDWHWUDGHDQGEXVLQHVVRUJDQL]DWLRQV 

 GLVWULEXWLQJ WKH VXEMHFW 5HTXHVW IRU 3URSRVDOV DQG 2IIHUV 5)32
 WR LGHQWLILHG UHDO
HVWDWH GHYHORSPHQW
 FRPSDQLHV DUFKLWHFWV HQJLQHHUV RWKHU FRQVXOWDQWV  
 SRVWLQJ WKH
VXEMHFW5HTXHVWIRU3URSRVDOVDQG2IIHUV
5)32
LQIRUPDWLRQRQWKH&LW\ZHESDJH
DQG

SODFLQJDGYHUWLVHPHQWVUHODWHGWRWKHVXEMHFW5HTXHVWIRU3URSRVDODQG2IIHUV 5)32

LQWKHDSSURSULDWHORFDODQGRUUHJLRQDOQHZVSDSHUV 3 Packet Pg. 19
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 378 of 403 ends

FA Fraser & Associates
Yuba City Successor Agency Page 11
Property Management Plan June 2015
$WWDFKPHQW$±3URSHUW\,QYHQWRU\'DWD
3 Packet Pg. 20
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 379 of 403 ends

$WWDFKPHQW$

<XED&LW\/RQJ5DQJH3URSHUW\0DQDJHPHQW3ODQ3URSHUW\,QYHQWRU\'DWD No. APN Existing Use Address Property Type Permissible Use Permissible Use Detail Acquisition
Date
Value at Time
of Purchase
Price
Estimated
Current Value
Properties to be Transferred for Government Use
7A 52-380-019 Town square and ROW 442 B Street Government use Government Use Government Use 10/1991 124,123 $366,315 Properties Proposed for Disposition
1 52-262-001 Abandoned site 444 Colusa Avenue Vacant Land Sale of Property Commercial 5/16/2001 101,615 $28,9892 52-324-023 Vacant Parcel 400 Bridge Street Vacant Land Sale of Property Industrial 10/27/2003 1,981,000 $ 1 3 52-502-008 Vacant Parcel 510 Boyd Vacant Land Sale of Property Commercial / Office 10/27/2003 145,000 $ 1 4 52-380-017 Vacant Parcel Wilbur and C Street Vacant Land Sale of Property Commercial Office 10/1991 97,334 $ 287,256 5 52-401-014 Residential 454 Stevens Ave Residential Sale of Property Residential 11/18/2008 121,173 $ 52,708 6 52-380-025 Vacant Parcel 433 Plumas Blvd. Vacant Lot/Land Sale of Property Commercial Office 10/1991 334,868 $ 648,300 7B 52-380-019 Vacant Parcel 442 B Street Vacant Lot/Land Sale of Property Commercial Office 10/1991 191,806 $ 566,062 8 53-194-013 Vacant Parcel Percy Ave Vacant Lot/Land Sale of Property Commercial Office 6/12/2000 267,532 $ 105,415 HSC 34191.5 (c)(2) HSC 34191.5 (c)(1
Attachment A June 15.xls 6/23/2015 1
3 Packet Pg. 21
n from City of Yuba City and Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Pla

Page 380 of 403 ends

$WWDFKPHQW$

<XED&LW\/RQJ5DQJH3URSHUW\,QYHQWRU\'D
No. APN
Properties to be Transferred
7A 52-380-019
Properties Proposed for Dis
1 52-262-0012 52-324-0233 52-502-0084 52-380-0175 52-401-0146 52-380-025 7B 52-380-019
8 53-194-013
25 HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(B) HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)
Value Basis
Date of
Estimated
Current Value
Proposed Sale
Value
Proposed
Sale Date
Purpose for which property was acquired Lot Size (SF) Current Zoning Estimate of Current
Parcel Value
Estimate of
Income/Revenue
Agency Estimate 2010 NA NA Public use 60,548 Commercial Office 366,315 NAAgency Estimate 2010 NA NA Implement Specific Plan 4,791 C-2 28,989 NA Appraisal 1/2015 $1.00 TBD Redevelopment of site 285,753 Industrial 1 NAAppraisal 1/2015 $1.00 TBD Redevelopment of site 42,688 Commercial Office 1 NA Agency Estimate 2010 TBD TBD Redevelopment of site 47,680 Commercial Office 287,256 NAAgency Estimate 2010 TBD TBD Redevelopment of site 8,712 Residential 52,708 NAAgency Estimate 2010 TBD TBD Redevelopment of site 107,157 Commercial Office 648,300 NAAgency Estimate 2010 TBD TBD Redevelopment of site 93,564 Commercial Office 566,062 NAAgency Estimate 2010 TBD TBD Redevelopment of site 17,424 Commercial Office 105,415 NA HSC 341 1)(A) SALE OF PROPERTY
Attachment A June 15.xls 6/23/2015 2
3 Packet Pg. 22
n from City of Yuba City and Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Pla

Page 381 of 403 ends

$WWDFKPHQW$

<XED&LW\/RQJ5DQJH3URSHUW\,QYHQWRU\'D
No. APN
Properties to be Transferred
7A 52-380-019
Properties Proposed for Dis
1 52-262-0012 52-324-0233 52-502-0084 52-380-0175 52-401-0146 52-380-025 7B 52-380-019
8 53-194-013
HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(F) HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)H)
Contractual
requirements for use
of income/revenue
History of
environmental
contamination, studies,
and/or remediation, and
designation as a
brownfield site
Description of
property's
potential for transit
oriented
development
Advancement of planning
objectives of the
successor agency
History of previous
development
proposals and activity
No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes

91.5 (c)(1)(E) HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)
Attachment A June 15.xls 6/23/2015 3
3 Packet Pg. 23
n from City of Yuba City and Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Pla

Page 382 of 403 ends

FA Fraser & Associates
Yuba City Successor Agency Page 12
Property Management Plan June 2015
$WWDFKPHQW%±$HULDO0DSV
3 Packet Pg. 24
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 383 of 403 ends

PLUMAS ST

COLUSA FRONTAGE RD
HWY 20 WB

ROCKHOLT WAY
HWY 20 EB
Parcel #1
52-262-001
444 Colusa Ave
52-262-001

0.11 Acres
5/16/2001 Site Address:

APN:

Parcel Size:

Date of Purchase:

Parcel # 1
3 Packet Pg. 25
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 384 of 403 ends

BRIDGE ST
WILBUR
AVE
A ST
B ST

CEMETARY WAY

SHASTA ST

EMERSON AVE

FIFTH ST BRIDGE ST WB OFF

BOYD ST
Parcel #3
52-502-008
Parcel #2
52-324-023
Parcel #7
52-380-019
400 Bridge St
52-324-023

6.56 Acres
10/27/2003 Site Address:

APN:

Parcel Size:

Date of Purchase:

Parcel # 2
3 Packet Pg. 26
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 385 of 403 ends

B ST

BOYD ST
Parcel #3
52-502-008
Parcel #2
52-324-023
510 Boyd St
52-502-008

0.99 Acres
10/27/2003 Site Address:

APN:

Parcel Size:

Date of Purchase:

Parcel # 3
3 Packet Pg. 27
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 386 of 403 ends

WILBUR AVE
C ST

TOWN SQUARE DR
Parcel #4
52-380-017
Parcel #7
52-380-019
Wilbur and C Street
52-380-017

1.09 Acres
10/1/1991 Site Address:

APN:

Parcel Size:

Date of Purchase:

Parcel # 4
3 Packet Pg. 28
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 387 of 403 ends

WILBUR AVE

STEVENS AVE
Parcel #5
52-401-014
Parcel #6
52-380-025
454 Stevens Ave
52-401-014

0.2 Acres
11/18/2008 Site Address:

APN:

Parcel Size:

Date of Purchase:

Parcel # 5
3 Packet Pg. 29
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 388 of 403 ends

WILBUR AVE

FRANKLIN AVE

PLUMAS BLVD

STEVENS AVE
Parcel #4
52-380-017
Parcel #5
52-401-014
Parcel #6
52-380-025
4 3OXPDV%OYG
52-380-025

2.32 Acres
10/1/1991 Site Address:

APN:

Parcel Size:

Date of Purchase:

Parcel # 6
3 Packet Pg. 30
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 389 of 403 ends

WILBUR AVE
C ST
C ST
B ST

TOWN SQUARE DR
Parcel #4
52-380-017
Parcel #7
52-380-019
442 B Street
52-380-019

3.85 Acres
10/1/1991 Site Address:

APN:

Parcel Size:

Date of Purchase:

Parcel # 7
3 Packet Pg. 31
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 390 of 403 ends

MAIN ST

PERCY AVE

MAIN ST

PLUMAS BLVD
Parcel #8
53-194-013
265 Percy Ave
53-194-013

0.4 Acres
6/12/2000 Site Address:

APN:

Parcel Size:

Date of Purchase:

Parcel # 8
3 Packet Pg. 32
Communication: Review of the Long-Range Property Management Plan from City of Yuba City and discussion on the next steps for disposal of

Page 391 of 403 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 392 of 403 ends

Successor Agency‐Owned Real Properties
APN Location Acreage Zoning GP Designation Environmental Status Current Owner 52‐380‐019 442 B St 2.15 C‐O (SP) Public & Semi‐Public Phase I ESA ‐ 16 recognized environmental  conditions identified (12 high priority) Successor Agency52‐380‐017 Wilbur Ave/C St 1.09 C‐O (SP) Office & Office Park Unknown ‐ Nothing noted in Geotracker Successor Agency52‐401‐014 454 Stevens Ave 0.2 C‐O (SP) Office & Office Park Unknown ‐ Nothing noted in Geotracker Successor Agency52‐380‐025 425 Franklin Ave 2.46 C‐O (SP) Office & Office Park Clean Closure Successor Agency53‐194‐013 Percy Ave/Plumas Blvd 0.34 C‐O (SP) Office & Office Park Unknown ‐ Nothing noted in Geotracker Successor Agency

Page 393 of 403 ends

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 394 of 403 ends

52-380-019
52-380-025
52-380-017
53-194-013
52-401-014
53-220-030
52-401-009
B
C
WILBU
R
PLUMAS
PER
C
Y

FRANKLIN
A
MOORE

NIELSON
ELM

DEL MONTE

WOODBRIDGE
PALM
DORMAN
TABER
MORTON
ROWE
JEWELL
WILLOW
SPRUCE
BROOKS

EMERSON
M
AIN

CAMPBELL
BOYD

BENNETT

TOWN SQUARE

STEVENS
PER
C
Y

DEL MONTE
C
TABER
1 inch = 300 feet
Legend
City owned parcels
Successor Agency owned parcels
Parcels

VICINITY MAP

Page 395 of 403 ends

01248.0005/809872.1
ATTACHMENT 4

Page 396 of 403 ends

01248.0005/809872.1
RESOLUTION NO. _________

RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE YUBA CITY

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DECLARING CERTAIN SUCCESSOR

AGENCY-OWNED REAL PROPERTIES TO BE SURPLUS LAND AND

DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO FOLLOW THE PROCEDURES

SET FORTH IN THE SURPLUS LAND ACT FOR THE SALE OF SUCH

PROPERTIES
WHEREAS, under the Surplus Land Act, Government Code section 54220 et seq., as amended on January 1, 2020 (the “Act”), surplus land is defined as “land owned in fee simple by any local agency for which the local agency’s governing body takes formal action in a regular public meeting declaring that the land is surplus and is not necessary for the agency’s use”; and
WHEREAS, under the Act, real property owned by a local agency, must be declared as “surplus land” or “exempt surplus land” as supported by written findings prior to the local agency taking any action to dispose of it; and WHEREAS, the Act authorizes the local agency to sell surplus real properties in the manner proscribed therein; and
WHEREAS, the Successor Agency to the Yuba City Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”) owns certain real properties identified in Exhibit A attached hereto, consisting of vacant and undeveloped land (the “Surplus Properties”); and WHEREAS, there is no present or contemplated use for these properties and therefore, they are surplus to the needs of the Successor Agency as they are not intended to be used for any governmental purpose or operations; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has determined it would be in the best interest of the Successor Agency to dispose of the Properties; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency now desires to declare the Surplus Properties as surplus land under the Act and to offer and initiate the sale of such properties in accordance with the procedures under the Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE YUBA CITY

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Successor Agency finds the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. The Successor Agency hereby finds and declares the Surplus Properties as surplus land under the Act, based on the written findings set forth below:
(a) The Surplus Properties have been determined to be no longer needed by the Successor Agency for any governmental purpose.

Page 397 of 403 ends

01248.0005/809872.1
(b) The Successor Agency has no current or future plans to use the Surplus Properties for any agency work or operations or any other governmental purposes.
(c) Therefore, the Surplus Properties are not necessary for the agency’s use and qualify as surplus land under the Act.

Section 3. The Successor Agency hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager or her designee to send written notices of availability (“NOA”) and offer the Surplus Properties for sale to each of the public agencies and entities listed in Government Code section 54222, and to negotiate the terms of a proposed sale of the Surplus Properties with any such agency or entity that responds to the NOA, and to otherwise follow the procedures of the Act, as applicable to a proposed sale of the Surplus Properties.

Section 4. In the event that none of the public agencies or entities listed in Government Code section 54222 offer to purchase one or more of the Surplus Properties, or if the Successor Agency and a public agency or entity listed in Government Code section 54222 does not reach an agreement on the terms and conditions of purchase/sale, the Successor Agency intends to offer the Surplus Properties (or any of them) for sale to the general public in compliance with the requirements and procedures under the Act.

Section 5. Any proposed agreement(s) for the sale of the Surplus Properties shall ultimately be subject to the approval of the Successor Agency and Oversight Board.

Section 6. The disposal/sale/transfer of the Surplus Properties is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to California Code of Regulation, Title 14, section 15312. However, if development is proposed on such properties by a subsequent buyer, then that development proposal would be reviewed and analyzed pursuant to the requirements under CEQA.

Section 7. This Resolution shall be effective on upon its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Successor Agency to the Yuba City Redevelopment Agency, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of August 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Name: Dave Shaw
Title: Chair of Successor Agency

Page 398 of 403 ends

01248.0005/809872.1
ATTEST:

Ciara Wakefield, Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
COUNSEL FOR SUCCESSOR AGENCY:

Shannon Chaffin, City Attorney
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
Attachment(s):
• Exhibit A – Successor Agency-Owned Real Properties to be declared as Surplus

Page 399 of 403 ends

Exhibit A ‐ Successor Agency‐Owned Real Properties
APN Location Acreage Zoning GP Designation Environmental Status Current Owner 52‐380‐019 442 B St 2.15 C‐O (SP) Public & Semi‐Public Phase I ESA ‐ 16 recognized environmental  conditions identified (12 high priority) Successor Agency52‐380‐017 Wilbur Ave/C St 1.09 C‐O (SP) Office & Office Park Unknown ‐ Nothing noted in Geotracker Successor Agency52‐401‐014 454 Stevens Ave 0.2 C‐O (SP) Office & Office Park Unknown ‐ Nothing noted in Geotracker Successor Agency52‐380‐025 425 Franklin Ave 2.46 C‐O (SP) Office & Office Park Clean Closure Successor Agency53‐194‐013 Percy Ave/Plumas Blvd 0.34 C‐O (SP) Office & Office Park Unknown ‐ Nothing noted in Geotracker Successor Agency

Page 400 of 403 ends

CITY OF YUBA CITY
Future Agenda Items
- Councilmember Boomgaarden
- Councilmember Espindola
- Councilmember Harris
- Vice Mayor Kirchner
- Mayor Shaw

Page 401 of 403 ends

CITY OF YUBA CITY
Reports and Communications
The following reports and communication items are provided for the Council’s information. No action can be taken on items under this section unless the Council agrees to include it on a subsequent agenda
City Manager’s Report

Page 402 of 403 ends

CITY OF YUBA CITY
Reports and Communications
The following reports and communication items are provided for the Council’s information. No action can be taken on items under this section unless the Council agrees to include it on a subsequent agenda
City Council Reports
- Councilmember Espindola
- Councilmember Harris
- Councilmember Boomgaarden
- Vice Mayor Kirchner
- Mayor Shaw
Adjournment

Page 403 of 403 ends
← All documents from this meeting