The City has adopted a Reasonable Accommodations Policy that provides a procedure for receiving and resolving requests for accommodation to participate in this meeting. Please visit yubacity.net ADA & Accessibility Resources page. If you need assistance in order to attend the City Council meeting, or if you require auxiliary aids or services, e.g., hearing aids or signing services to make a presentation to the City Council, the City is happy to help. Accommodations should be requested as early as possible as additional time may be required in order to provide the requested accommodation; 72 hours in advance is suggested. Please contact City offices at (530) 822-4817 or (TTY: 530-822-4732), so such aids or services can be arranged. Requests may also be made by email at [email protected] or [email protected] or mail City Clerk, 1201 Civic Center Blvd, Yuba City, CA 95993.
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 7, 2023
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF YUBA CITY
5:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION
SUTTER ROOM/VIRTUAL
6:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS/VIRTUAL
MAYOR ● Wade Kirchner
VICE MAYOR ● Shon Harris
COUNCILMEMBER ● Marc Boomgaarden
COUNCILMEMBER ● Michael Pasquale
COUNCILMEMBER ● Dave Shaw
CITY MANAGER ● Diana Langley
CITY ATTORNEY ● Shannon L. Chaffin
1201 Civic Center Blvd
Yuba City CA 95993
Wheelchair Accessible
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF YUBA CITY
FEBRUARY 7, 2023
5:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION
SUTTER ROOM/VIRTUAL
6:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS/VIRTUAL
Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office at 1201 Civic Center Blvd., Yuba City, during normal business hours. Such documents are also available on the City of Yuba City’s website at www.yubacity.net, subject to staff’s availability to post the documents before the meeting.
The Council Chambers will be open for public attendance and participation. The meeting will also be live streamed for public viewing, but not participation, at the following link:
https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_eWF5FvoQQNiljSSQd7cCAA. Emailed comments sent to [email protected] at least 24 hours before the meeting will be distributed to the City Council prior to the meeting. Please identify the Agenda item(s) addressed by the comments.
Public Comment:
Any member of the public wishing to address the City Council on any item listed on the closed session agenda will have an opportunity to present testimony to the City Council in the Council Chamber prior to the City Council convening into closed session. Comments from the public will be limited to three minutes. No member of the public will be allowed to be present once the City Council convenes into closed session.
Closed Session
Conference with Legal Counsel—Existing Litigation per Govt. Code §54956.9; Diana Barrett v. City of Yuba City, et.al. Superior Ct. CVCS20-0001102; Ct. of Appeal C097139 Regular Meeting
Call to Order
Roll Call
__ Mayor Kirchner
__ Vice Mayor Harris
__ Councilmember Boomgaarden
__ Councilmember Pasquale
__ Councilmember Shaw
Invocation/Inspiration
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
City Attorney's Report on Closed Session Items, City Attorney Shannon Chaffin Agenda Modifications/Approval of Agenda
Ceremonial Presentations
1. Mayor's Pin Presentation
Public Communication
2. Appearance of Interested Citizens
You are welcome and encouraged to participate in this meeting. Public comment is taken on action items appearing on the Consent Calendar or Business Items on the Agenda when they are called. Public comment on any other items within the scope of the City’s jurisdiction, including items not listed on the Agenda will be considered at this time. Public comment is limited to three minutes per speaker. Members of the public submitting written requests at least 24 hours prior to the meeting will be allotted five minutes to comment per speaker. Repetitive comments may be limited, and large groups are encouraged to select representatives to express the opinions of the group.
Consent Calendar
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and can be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items prior to the time that Council votes on the motion unless members of the City Council request specific items to be discussed or removed from the Consent Calendar for individual action.
3. Minutes from the January 17 and 26, 2023 meetings
Recommendation: Approve the minutes from the January 17 and 26, 2023 meetings
4. Annual Community Facilities District Report
Recommendation: Note and file
5. Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 Subdivision (Subdivision Agreement and Final Map Approval)
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution approving the execution of a Subdivision Agreement with YC Hooper Ventures, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company providing for public improvements associated with the Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 Subdivision Map, approving the Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 Subdivision Final Map, accepting dedication of rights-of-way and easements shown thereon and authorizing the filing of the map. (Subdivision is located north of North Colusa Frontage Road, East of Hooper Road, and west of El Margarita Road)
6. Local Highway Safety Improvement Program Project Awards Recommendation: A. Authorize the Finance Director to make a supplemental appropriation of $3,164,260 in Highway Safety Improvement Program grant funding to Account No. 921314 (Citywide Signal Hardware Upgrades), 921315 (Citywide Sign Upgrades & Audit), 921316 (Ped Safety Crosswalk Upgrades), 921317 (SHS Signal Hardware Upgrades), and 921318 (Local Roadway Safety Plan) B. Authorize the Finance Director to transfer $23,840 from
Account No. 911253 (2018 Safe Routes to School Plan) to Account No. 911314 (Citywide Signal Hardware Upgrades) and $8,000 from Account No. 921253 (2018 Safe Routes to School Plan) to Account No. 921318 (Local Roadway Safety Plan)
7. Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Round 1 Grant Projects - Contract Amendment
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution to award Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with West Yost and
Associates, Inc. to initiate additional data collection activities for updating the modeling of Gilsizer Slough for the Prop 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Projects
8. Authorization to submit Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) Grant Applications for Illegal Disposal Site Abatement Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yuba City authorizing the Public Works and Development Services
Director, or designee, to submit and administer CalRecycle grant applications and projects for a period of five years on behalf of the City
9. Request to establish Planned Development (PD) 15 and approval of a Development Agreement for the Chima Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map SM 22- 07 Recommendation: A. Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yuba City approving Planned Development (PD) No. 15 for the Chima Ranch Subdivision (SM 22-07) located in the southwest portion of the City along the west side of Sanbon Road and immediately west of the intersection of Pebble Beach Drive and Sanborn Road (Assessor’s Parcels 65-020-009 and 65-020-010) and an associated Mitigated Negative Declaration, by title only and waive the second reading
B. Adopt an Uncodified Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yuba City approving a development agreement for the Chima Ranch Subdivision Map (SM 22-07) between the City of Yuba City and Interwest Homes Corporation, a California corporation, to develop 82 single-family lots on 14.86 acres located in the southwest portion of the City along the west side of Sanborn Road immediately west of the intersection of Pebble Beach Drive and Sanborn Road, Assessor’s Parcels 65-020-009 and 65-020- 010, by title only and waive the second reading
10. Consideration of Rezone (RZ) 22-08: Spirit Drive Parcel Map Recommendation: Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yuba City to adopt Rezone 22-08 for the Spirit Drive Parcel Map project located at the southeast corner of State Route 20 (Colusa Highway) and El Margarita Road (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 63- 010-141) by title only and waive the second reading
11. Consideration of Planned Development (PD) 17: Nestory Park Self Storage Recommendation: Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yuba City approving a Planned Development (PD) 17 for Nestory Park Self Storage located along the north side of Winship Road
approximately 430 feet east of the intersection of Winship Road and Garden Highway (APNs: 53-500-008 and 53-500-035) and an associated Mitigated Negative Declaration by title only and waive the second reading
12. Approve Regional Appointments to the Feather River Air Quality Management District (FRAQMD) Board of Directors for 2023
Recommendation: Approve the Appointment of Councilmembers Jeramy Chapdelaine (Live Oak) and Angela Teter (Wheatland) to serve as Alternate Directors on the FRAQMD Board of Directors
13. Updates to the City of Yuba City Conflict of Interest Code Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution Amending the City of Yuba City Conflict of Interest Code and list of Designated Positions
14. Emergency Purchase of Four (4) Ford Three-Quarter Ton Pickups Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution to award the purchase of four (4) Ford threequarter ton pickups to Geweke Ford of Yuba City, CA, in the notto-exceed amount of $161,000.00 and authorizing the purchase of necessary equipment and decals, estimated at $19,000.00, in order to place the vehicles in service
Business Items
15. Utilities Rate Study 2024 Award
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution awarding the Utilities Rate Study 2024 to Black & Veatch Management Consulting, LLC of Los Angeles, CA in the amount of $159,705 plus a contingency of $32,000, with the finding that it is in the best interest of the City
16. Consideration of General Plan Amendment (GPA) 22-05, the appeal of Rezone (RZ) 22-06, and a Categorical Exemption under CEQA Guideline Section 15301:
Gorsi Medical Office Rezone
Recommendation: A. Conduct a Public Hearing, and:
B. Move to continue the matter regarding General Plan
Amendment 22-05, the appeal of Rezone 22-06, and the
associated Environmental determination for the project, Gorsi Medical Office Rezone, at 467 Gray Avenue (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 52-122-011) to February 21, 2023, with direction to staff to return with a resolution with appropriate findings consistent with Council direction for final determination of the matter Future Agenda Items
17. Future Agenda Items
- Mayor Kirchner
- Vice Mayor Harris
- Councilmember Boomgaarden
- Councilmember Paquale
- Councilmember Shaw
Reports and Communications
The following reports and communication items are provided for the Council’s information. No action can be taken on items under this section unless the Council agrees to include it on a subsequent agenda
18. City Manager's Report
19. City Council Reports
- Councilmember Boomgaarden
- Councilmember Paquale
- Councilmember Shaw
- Vice Mayor Harris
- Mayor Kirchner
Adjournment
CITY OF YUBA CITY
Public Communication
Members of the public may address the City Council on items of interest that are within the City’s jurisdiction. Individuals addressing general comments are encouraged to limit their statements.
Procedure
You are welcome and encouraged to participate in this meeting. Complete a Speaker Card located in the lobby and give to the Clerk, public comment is taken on action items appearing on the Consent Calendar or Business Items on the Agenda when they are called. Public comment on any other items within the scope of the City’s jurisdiction, including items not listed on the Agenda, will be considered at this time.
When a matter is announced, wait to be recognized by the Mayor to provide your comments to the Council. Comments should begin by providing your name and place of residence. A three minute limit is requested when addressing Council.
Request for additional time to address Council
Members of the public submitting written requests at least 24 hours prior to the meeting will be allotted 5 minutes to comment per speaker. Repetitive comments may be limited, and large groups are encouraged to select representatives to express the opinions of the group.
Procedure
When requesting to comment, please indicate your name and the topic and mail to:
City of Yuba City
Attn: City Clerk
1201 Civic Center Blvd
Yuba City CA 95993
Or email to:
Jackie Sillman, City Clerk
[email protected]
Agenda Item 3
CITY OF YUBA CITY
STAFF REPORT
Date: February 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Administration Department
Presentation By: Ciara Wakefield, City Clerk Administrator Summary
Subject: Minutes from the January 17 and 26, 2023 meetings Recommendation: Approve the minutes from the January 17 and 26, 2023 meetings Fiscal Impact: None
Attachments:
1. 01-17-2023 - Regular Meeting Minutes (DRAFT)
2. 01-26-2023 Special Closed Session Minutes (DRAFT)
Prepared By: Submitted By:
Ciara Wakfield
City Clerk Administrator
Diana Langley
City Manager
ATTACHMENT 1
MINUTES (DRAFT)
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF YUBA
CITY JANUARY 17, 2023
6:00 P.M. REGULAR
MEETING COUNCIL
CHAMBERS/VIRTUAL
Regular Meeting
Call to Order
The Regular Meeting of the City Council called to order by Mayor Kirchner at 6:00 PM Roll Call
Present: Mayor Kirchner and Councilmembers Boomgaarden, Harris, Pasquale and Shaw
Absent: None
Invocation/Inspiration
Pastor Dan Callaghan, First Baptist Church of Yuba City Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
Ciara Wakefield, City Clerk Administrator
Agenda Modifications/Approval of Agenda
Item 7 was pulled from the Consent Calendar to be discussed separately. This item was heard as the first item of Business
Ceremonial Presentations
1. First Baptist Church 100 Years – Proclamation
Mayor Kirchner presented a proclamation to Pastor Dan Callaghan from First Baptist Church of Yuba City
2. National Human Trafficking Awareness Month Proclamation Mayor Kirchner presented a proclamation to Sandee Drown and members of Soroptimist International of Marysville-Yuba City
3. You Can! with Yuba City – Presentation
Ashley Potočnik, Development Liaison, gave a presentation
4. Didar S. Bains Park Construction Update
Brad McIntire, Community Services Director, gave a presentation
Public Communication
5. Appearance of Interested Citizens
Heather Esemann spoke
Jackie Sillman spoke
Consent Calendar
Vice-Mayor Harris moved and Councilmember Shaw seconded the motion to approve Items 6 and 8-12 (excluding Item 7):
6. Minutes from December 20, 2022 and January 6, 2023
Approve the minutes from the December 20, 2022 and January 6, 2023 meeting [Item 7 moved to business]
7. Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim for FY 2022-2023 of $3,460,760 in Local Transportation Funds (LTF)
Adopt a Resolution authorizing submission of the City’s FY 2022- 2023 TDA claim to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)
8. Utilities Mid-year Capital Acquisition Requests
A. Approve the following mid-year capital acquisition purchases:
1. Two (2) Evoqua Chlorination Analyzers
2. East Effluent Flowmeter Additional Work
3. Laboratory Autoclave
B. Adopt Resolution 23-002 awarding the purchase of one (1) Evoqua Micro2000 Chlorine Analyzer and one (1) Evoqua Deox2000 Sodium Bisulfite Analyzer (Item 1) to G3 Engineering, Inc. of Granite Bay, CA in the total amount of $31,500, with the finding that it is in the best interest of the City
C. Adopt Resolution 23-003 awarding an amendment for additional work to the purchase of an Endress Hauser Promag Flowmeter (Item 2) for the WWTF east effluent flow to Telstar Instruments of Concord, CA in the amount of $10,689 for a purchase total of $30,371.85, with the finding that it is in the best interest of the City
D. Authorize a supplemental appropriation and related transfers in the amount of $31,500 from Account No. 981103-65501 (WWTF Recurring Plant Projects) to 8120- 69201 (WWTF Equipment) for the purchase of two (2) Evoqua Chlorination Analyzers (Item 1)
E. Authorize a supplemental appropriation and related transfers in the amount of $10,689 from Account No. 981103-65501 (WWTF Recurring Plant Projects) to 8120- 69201 (WWTF Equipment) for additional work for the purchase of one (1) Endress Hauser Promag Flowmeter (Item 2)
F. Authorize a supplemental appropriation and related transfers in the amount of $13,866.37 from Account No. 8140-66001 (Laboratory Other Materials & Supplies) to 8140-69201 (Laboratory Equipment) for the purchase of one (1) Laboratory
Autoclave (Item 3)
9. Plans Examiner I/II
Adopt Resolution 23-004 authorizing the Finance Director to amend the salary schedule for the Plans Examiner I/II classification and to set appropriate compensation
10. CalPERS Employer Paid Member Contribution Resolutions Adopt Resolution 23-005 for paying and reporting the value of Employer Paid Member Contributions for the Police Mid-Managers and Police First Level Managers
11. Proposed City Hall Holiday Closures
Adopt 23-006 Resolution authorizing the closure of City Hall for Monday, July 3, 2023 through Tuesday, July 4, 2023, Monday, November 20, 2023 through Friday, November 24, 2023, and Monday, December 25, 2023 through Monday, January 1, 2024
12. 2022-2023 CDBG Annual Action Plan Amendment
A. Adopt Resolution 23-007 approving the proposed 2022 Annual Action Plan Amendment and authorize staff to submit the required documents to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for processing, and; B. Authorize the Finance Director to make budget allocations as necessary to implement the 2022 Annual Action Plan Amendment, and;
C. Authorize the Finance Director to allocate $47,758 in unallocated General Fund CIP funds to the Yuba Sutter Gleaners Foodbank project The motion was passed with a unanimous vote
Business Items
[Item 7 pulled from Consent Calendar]
7. Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim for FY 2022-2023 of $3,460,760 in Local Transportation Funds (LTF)
Councilmember Pasquale moved and Councilmember Shaw seconded the motion to:
Adopt Resolution 23-001 authorizing submission of the City’s FY 2022- 2023 TDA claim to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)
The motion was passed with a unanimous vote
13. Community Sponsorship Request
Councilmember Shaw moved and Vice-Mayor Harris seconded the motion to:
Adopt Resolution 23-008 to approve a monetary sponsorship request from Film YubaSutter of $6,250.00 to assist in funding the Film Yuba-Sutter Film Commission
The motion was passed with a unanimous vote
14. Consideration of Planned Development (PD) 17 in association with Development Plan (DP) 22-04, Nestory Park Self Storage
Mayor Kirchner opened a Public Hearing
No public comment
Mayor Kirchner closed the Public Hearing
Councilmember Boomgaarden moved and Councilmember Pasquale seconded the motion to:
Introduce an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yuba City approving a Planned Development (PD) 17 for Nestory Park Self Storage located along the north side of Winship Road approximately 430 feet east of the intersection of Winship Road and Garden Highway (APNs: 53-500-008 and 53-500-035) and an associated Mitigated Negative Declaration by title only and waive the first reading
The motion was passed with a unanimous vote
15. Consideration of General Plan Amendment (GPA) 22-06, and Rezone (RZ) 22-08 in association with Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) 22-04: Spirit Drive Parcel Map Mayor Kirchner opened a Public Hearing
Shawn Minard spoke
Mayor Kirchner closed the Public Hearing
Councilmember Shaw moved and Councilmember Boomgaarden seconded the motion to:
B. Adopt Resolution 23-009 of the City Council of the City of Yuba City approving Environmental Assessment (EA) 22-15 by adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for Spirit Drive Parcel Map project, and adopt General Plan Amendment 22-06 for approximately 8 acres located at the southeast corner of State Route 20 and El Margarita Road (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 63- 010-141); C. Introduce an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yuba City to adopt Rezone 22-08 for the Spirit Drive Parcel Map project located at the southeast corner of State Route 20 (Colusa Highway) and El Margarita Road (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 63- 010-141) by title only and waive the first reading The motion was passed with a unanimous vote
16. Request to establish Planned Development (PD) 15 and approval of a development agreement for the Chima Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map SM 22- 07 The Clerk received a letter re: Item 16 prior to the meeting. The letter was distributed to City Council in advance of the meeting and printed copies were made available to the public [Councilmember Shaw recused himself]
Mayor Kirchner opened a Public Hearing
Heather Esemann spoke
Anthony Kurlan spoke
Shawn Minard spoke
Mayor Kirchner closed the Public Hearing
Councilmember Boomgaarden moved and Vice-Mayor Harris seconded the motion to:
B. Introduce an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yuba City approving Planned Development (PD) No. 15 for the Chima Ranch Subdivision (SM 22-07) located In the southwest portion of the City along the west side of Sanborn Road and immediately west of the intersection of Pebble Beach Drive and Sanborn Road (Assessor’s Parcels 65-020-009 And 65-020-010) and an associated Mitigated Negative Declaration by title only and waive the first reading C. Introduce an Uncodified Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yuba City approving a Development Agreement for the Chima Ranch Subdivision Map (SM 22-07) between the City of Yuba City and Interwest Homes Corporation, a California Corporation, to Develop 82 Single-Family Lots on 14.86 Acres located in the southwest portion of the City along the west side of Sanborn Road immediately west of the intersection of Pebble Beach Drive and Sanborn Road, Assessor’s Parcels 65-020-009 And 65-020-010 by title only and waive the first reading The motion was passed with 3 votes [Shaw recused and Pasquale opposed] Future Agenda Items
17. Future Agenda Items
No Suggestions
Reports and Communications
18. City Manager's Report
19. City Council Reports
- Councilmember Boomgaarden
- Councilmember Pasquale
- Councilmember Shaw
- Vice Mayor Harris
- Mayor Kirchner
Adjournment
Mayor Kirchner adjourned the Regular Meeting of the City Council at 8:25 PM _____________________________
Wade Kirchner, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Ciara Wakefield, Deputy City Clerk
ATTACHMENT 2
MINUTES (DRAFT)
SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF YUBA CITY
JANUARY 26, 2023
8:00 A.M. SPECIAL MEETING HARVEST ROOM
1465 THARP ROAD
YUBA CITY CA 95993
Special Meeting
Call to Order
Mayor Kirchner called the Special Meeting of the City Council to order at 8:12 AM Roll Call
Present: Mayor Kirchner and Councilmembers Boomgaarden, Harris, Pasquale, and Shaw
Absent: None
Pledge of Allegiance
Michael Morris
Agenda Modifications/Approval of Agenda
Item 4, Public Communication was moved to the first item of business.
General Items
Public Communication
4. Appearance of Interested Citizens
No public comment
1. Council Goals and Priorities
2. Department Accomplishments 2022
3. Discussion Topics
o Speeding/Sideshows
o Fireworks
o Boat/RV Storage
o Mobile Vendors
o City Tree Maintenance/Sidewalk Issues
o Campaign Signs
o Campaign Paperwork
o Community Workshops
Adjournment
The Special Meeting was adjourned by Mayor Kirchner at 4:15 PM ____________________________
Wade Kirchner, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Ciara Wakefield, Deputy City Clerk
Agenda Item 4
CITY OF YUBA CITY
STAFF REPORT
Date: February 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Finance/IT Department
Presentation By: Spencer Morrison, Finance Director
Summary
Subject: Annual Community Facilities District Report
Recommendation: Note and file
Fiscal Impact: Information item only
Purpose:
Annual report of the background and current status of the Community Facilities District as required by state law.
Council's Strategic Goal:
This item addresses the Council's Strategic Goal of fiscal responsibility.
Background:
In accordance with Government Code Sections 50075.3 (regarding special taxes) and 53411 (report on bonded proceeds), a report concerning the Sunsweet Boulevard and Valencia Estates Community Facilities Districts is required to be filed annually with the City Council. This staff report serves to fulfill the requirement. The report must address the following items:
Sunsweet Boulevard, established 2004
1. The amount of funds collected and expended – On May 12, 2005, the City issued $3,250,000 in Community Facilities District Bonds. Of this amount, $2,705,904 was placed into the project fund and the remainder was used for cost of issuance and to establish a reserve fund. The entire $2,705,904 has been expended on the project. On July 19, 2016, the outstanding bonds, $2,437,327, were refunded and are referred to as special tax refunding bonds, series 2016.
Special tax assessments were placed on the properties within the district and the amount collected for calendar year 2022, as of December 31, is $225,445 in assessments. These funds will be used to pay debt service.
2. The status of the project required or authorized to be funded – The project as defined by the “List of Authorized Facilities” (that was adopted as part of the resolution forming the district) is complete, including related improvements (traffic signal at Highway 99 and connector road to
Walton Avenue on the south side of Sunsweet), with a Notice of Completion dated July, 2007.
Valencia Estates, established 2017 & CFD 2021-1
1. The amount of funds collected and expended – during fiscal year 2021-22, the City collected $46,006 in special assessments from the district property owners.
2. The status of the project required or authorized to be funded – the City expended $2,763.19 on district administration on behalf of the district, with the remainder to fund police protection services; fire protection and suppression services; maintenance of parks, parkways, streets and roads, and open space; flood and storm protection services, among other less common services.
Fiscal Impact:
Information item only.
Recommendation:
Note and file.
Attachments:
None
Prepared By: Submitted By:
Spencer Morrison
Finance Director
Diana Langley
City Manager
Agenda Item 5
CITY OF YUBA CITY
STAFF REPORT
Date: February 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Public Works Department
Presentation By: Ben Moody, Public Works & Development Services Director Summary
Subject: Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 Subdivision (Subdivision Agreement and Final Map Approval)
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution approving the execution of a Subdivision Agreement with YC Hooper Ventures, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company providing for public improvements associated with the Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 Subdivision Map, approving the Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 Subdivision Final Map, accepting dedication of rights-of-way and easements shown thereon and authorizing the filing of the map. (Subdivision is located north of North Colusa Frontage Road, East of Hooper Road, and west of El Margarita Road) Fiscal Impact: Costs and reimbursements in accordance with proposed Subdivision Agreement Purpose:
To approve the necessary agreement and final subdivision map that specify the terms for the Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 development.
Council’s Strategic Goal:
Executing a subdivision agreement, approving a final map, and accepting dedications does not directly meet one of the Council’s Strategic Goals. These actions are necessary to comply with the Subdivision Map Act and City policy to facilitate the private development project.
Background:
On November 10, 2021, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Map SM 21-01, Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 Subdivision, to subdivide 17.98 acres into 96 single family residential parcels located north of North Colusa Frontage Road, east of Hooper Road, and west of El Margarita Road (Attachment 2). The proposed lot sizes range from 5,775 square feet to 8,761 square feet.
Since Planning Commission approval, the developer and its representatives have been coordinating with City staff to develop the necessary improvement plans and determine the terms of the Subdivision Agreement in accordance with the conditions of approval for the development and City policy.
Analysis:
The procedure for approval of a Final Map is outlined in Title 8, Chapter 2, Article 8 of the Municipal Code. The process is summarized as follows:
• Tentative Map – The applicant submits a tentative map to the Development Services Department, which is then routed to all City Departments and other agencies for review, comment, and establishment of the Conditions of Approval. Upon preparation of the Conditions of Approval and the environmental document, the map is taken to the Planning Commission for approval. The tentative map for the subject project was approved by the Planning Commission on November 10, 2021.
• Final Map – Upon approval of the tentative map, the applicant submits a Final Map package which includes the Final Map and public improvement plans. If the applicant chooses to file the map prior to the construction of the public improvements, the City requires the execution of a Subdivision Agreement guaranteeing that the improvements will be constructed through the collection of security, such as bonds or a letter of credit. • Council Approval – Once it is determined that the Final Map is correct and the Conditions of Approval have been met, the map is taken to the City Council for consideration and approval. • Recordation of the Final Map – Upon Council approval, the City Clerk certifies the action on the map and it is submitted to the Sutter County Recorder for recordation.
In order to proceed with the development, the property owner is to enter into a Subdivision Agreement (Agreement) with the City to ensure the construction of the required public improvements. The Agreement specifies the obligations of the property owner regarding the fees, dedications, and improvements that are required as a condition of the subdivision, and guarantees that the required public improvements will be constructed.
With the recordation of the Final Map, the determined right-of-way and utility easements will be dedicated to the City. Road dedications include Millie Drive, Billie Keith Way, Wayne Way, and Ethel Drive, and portions of El Margarita Road and Hooper Road.
Fiscal Impact:
Costs and reimbursements for the public improvements are specified through the proposed Agreement.
Exhibit B of the Agreement identifies the fees owed by the Developer to the City at the time of execution of the Agreement. Those fees include plan check, inspection, and water hot tap fees, and reimbursements totaling $197,075.49.
Alternatives:
Delay or modify the recommended actions of approving a Subdivision Agreement or Final Map for Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 Subdivision.
Recommendation:
Adopt a Resolution approving the execution of a Subdivision Agreement with YC Hooper Ventures, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company, providing for public improvements associated with the Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 Subdivision Map, approving the Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 Subdivision Final Map, accepting dedication of rights-of-way and easements shown thereon and authorizing the filing of the map. (Subdivision is located north of North Colusa Frontage Road, East of Hooper Road, and west of El Margarita Road).
Attachments:
1. Resolution - Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 Subdivision (Subdivision Agreement and Final Map Approval)
2. Location Map - Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 Subdivision (Subdivision Agreement and Final Map Approval)
Prepared By: Submitted By:
Kevin Bradford
Deputy Public Works Director – Engineering
Diana Langley
City Manager
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. _______
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUBA CITY
APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT WITH YC HOOPER VENTURES, LLC FOR THE HENSON RANCH ESTATES – PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION, APPROVING THE HENSON RANCH ESTATES – PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION FINAL MAP SUBDIVIDING LAND INTO 96 PARCELS
TO CONSTRUCT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, AND ACCEPTING FOR
DEDICATION THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN
THEREON
WHEREAS, YC Hooper Ventures, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company (“subdivider”) owns certain property as identified on Exhibit “B” and has offered for approval a Final Map designated as “Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 Subdivision” ("final map"), pursuant to approved Tentative Map for Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1 Subdivision ("tentative map"); and
WHEREAS, the subdivision lies within the boundaries of the City of Yuba City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Yuba City, by formal resolution, approved said tentative map; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has subsequently reviewed the final map and has determined that the conditions of approval associated with the final map have been satisfied, that the final map is in substantial conformance with the tentative map, and that the final map is ready for City Council approval; and
WHEREAS, all the certificates which appear on the final map (except the approval certificate of the Council of the City of Yuba City and the recording certificate of the Recorder of the County of Sutter) have been signed and acknowledged and said final map has been filed for approval; and
WHEREAS, the final map conforms to all of the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and City ordinances, resolutions and standards, except that Section 66492 and 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act may not be fully complied with at the time of passage of this resolution and owner having previously filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Sutter County a Tax Compliance Certificate Request along with copies of the final map considered herewith by the Council; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with all applicable general and specific plans of the City; and,
WHEREAS, the owner, whose signature(s) appear on the final map, and others have offered for dedication certain streets, public utility easements, access rights and other public properties and uses as shown and delineated upon said final map; and
WHEREAS, required public improvements have not been completed by the subdivider as of the filing of the final map, and all required public improvements shall be required to be completed in accordance with a Subdivision Improvement Agreement approved by and between the City and the Subdivider; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to approve the Subdivision Agreement with
subdivider, approve the final map, and accept all dedications thereunder.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Yuba City does resolve as follows:
1. Subdivision Agreement: The City Council approves the Subdivision Agreement with YC Hooper Ventures, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute the same on behalf of the City of Yuba City.
2. Findings for Final Map: The City Council finds that:
a. The final map is in substantial compliance with the tentative map, any deviations therefrom being deemed to be approved by the Council.
b. The requisite conditions associated with the tentative map have been satisfied, subject to the terms of the Subdivision Agreement approved concurrently herewith. c. The final map is in conformance with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan(s).
d. The final map conforms to all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California.
3. Approval of Final Map and Acceptance of Dedications: The City Council approves the final map attached hereto as Exhibit “B”, subject to the terms of the Subdivision Agreement approved concurrently herewith, and subject to complete compliance with Sections 66492 and 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act prior to release of the final map for recordation.
The City Council accepts any and all of the streets, public utility easements, public utility facilities, access rights and all parcels of land and easements offered for dedication on the final map, unless it is stated on the final map that said dedications are subject to City acceptance of subdivider-installed improvements, in which case acceptance shall be subject to improvement in accordance with Section 66477.1 of the California Government Code.
The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Yuba City at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of February, 2023.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Wade Kirchner, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ciara Wakefield, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
COUNSEL FOR YUBA CITY:
Shannon Chaffin, City Attorney
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
Exhibit “A” – Subdivision Agreement
Exhibit “B” – Final Map (Henson Ranch Estates – Phase 1, City of Yuba City)
EXHIBIT “A”
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC21-16
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF YUBA CITY APPROVING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP (TSM) 21-01, HENSON RANCH, ,
SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND MITIGATION MEASURES, CREATING 96 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND A 6.63-ACRE REMAINDER ON 25.14 ACRES, LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF COLUSA HIGHWAY
FRONTAGE ROAD BETWEEN HOOPER ROAD ON THE WEST AND EL MARGARITA ROAD ON THE EAST (ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS 62-082-009, 62-082-011, 62- 082-014, 62-082-015), AND ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED AS DETAILED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 21-01.
WHEREAS, the City received a tentative subdivision map application for this property in June 2021 to subdivide the approximately 25.14-acre property. TSM 21-01 would create 96 single-family residential lots, and a 6.63-acre remainder. All of the new lots will be provided full City services; and
WHEREAS, this property is within Yuba City’s city limits and the property owner wished to develop their property to urban levels; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed related Environmental Assessment 21- 01 considering a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) prepared for the project, which provided mitigations that reduce significant impacts to less than significant; and WHEREAS, a review of the General Plan and Zoning Regulations determined that the proposed subdivision was consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Regulations; and WHEREAS, the City on October 20, 2021, published a legal notice and a Public Hearing notice was mailed to each property owner within at least 300 feet of the project site in compliance with State law concerning the Planning Commission’s consideration on November 10, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on November 10, 2021 and considered all of the project and environmental information presented by staff, public testimony and all of the background information.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Planning Commission of the City of Yuba City resolves and orders as follows:
Environmental finding: The Planning Commission finds that an environmental assessment initial study was prepared for this project in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This process included the distribution of requests for comment from other responsible or affected agencies and interested organizations. Preparation of the environmental assessment necessitated a thorough review of the proposed project and relevant environmental issues and considered previously prepared environmental and technical studies. While the proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment, the Commission finds that feasible mitigation measures or alternatives have been incorporated into the project in order to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. The project-specific mitigation measures included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects are set forth in the attached Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
2 Declaration. With the project specific mitigations imposed, there is no substantial evidence in the record that this project may have significant direct, indirect or cumulative effects on the environment.
Subdivision Findings: None of the findings required by Yuba City Municipal Code Section 8-
2.609, and the California Subdivision Map Act Section 66474 that require the City to deny approval of a tentative map apply to this project:
1. The proposed tentative subdivision map is not consistent with the applicable general plan and specific plan.
2. The design and improvement of the tentative subdivision map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans or adopted City standards.
3. That the site is not physically suited for the density of development.
4. That the site is not physically suited for the type of development.
5. That the design of the subdivision map or likely improvements is likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
6. That the design of the subdivision maps or the type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems.
7. None of the findings in Section 6-9.603 of the Municipal Code is satisfied.
8. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
Evidence:
1. The proposed 96 single-family residential lots on approximately 18.51 acres of the 25.14- acre property are designated in the General Plan as LDR. This designation provides for a gross residential density range of 2 to 8 residences per acre. This proposal is for approximately 5.2 residences per acre, which is well within the General Plan density range standard provided in the Land Use Element.
Hooper Road is designated in the General Plan as a collector street. The on-site portions of the street, including the remainder portions will be improved to a collector standard.
With the increased traffic generated by the subdivision it will remain within the LOS standard of D or better as provided in the General Plan Circulation Element.
The proposed 96 new residences are consistent with the Housing Element’s call for more housing. The project is not within a specific plan.
As determined in the mitigated negative declaration prepared for the subdivision there are no significant impacts on any agricultural land, biological resources, water quality, and air quality; the project will be paying its fair share (development impact fees) for local parks.
Thus, the project is consistent with the Environmental Conservation Element of the General Plan.
2. As discussed above, this single-family residential land division meets all General Plan consistency requirements. Further, the project is conditioned to meet all City
3 development and improvement standards including water, wastewater, stormwater, street cross-sections, and streetscape landscaping. Each new residential lot meets the minimum lot size requirements of the R-1 Zone District.
3. The site is flat and has all City services available to it or, in the case of stormwater drainage, the system will be designed and constructed to be part of a larger drainage system operated by the Sutter County Water Agency. The environmental document prepared for the project did not find any environmental concerns that could not be mitigated to below a level of significance or where the inadequacies of the property that would provide concerns for its proposed development.
4. The site is flat, surrounded by existing development and physically suited to be readily developable. The portion of the property where the proposed residential land division is located is designated by the General Plan for single-family residential development. As previously discussed, all City services will be available to the property.
5. Based on the mitigated negative declaration prepared for this project, the project will not create any significant environmental impacts, including adverse impacts on fish and wildlife.
6. Every new lot will be connected to City water, wastewater, and storm drainage systems, which will avoid public health problems.
7. The facilities of the State plan of flood control or other flood management facilities protect the property to the urban level of flood protection in urban and urbanizing areas or the national Federal Emergency Management Agency standard of flood protection in nonurbanized areas.
8. The subdivision will be served by public streets that are dedicated to the City for public use. There is no use of private streets or other types of easements that the project would conflict with. There are no known existing easements that will be adversely affected by this subdivision.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission, based on Environmental Assessment 21-01 and the list of identified mitigation measures, determines the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project as well as the associated Mitigation Monitoring Program, and approves Tentative Subdivision Map 21-01 Henson Ranch, as shown in Exhibit A, subject to the Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Measures as provided in Exhibit B.
The foregoing resolution was introduced at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on November 10, 2021, by Commissioner Doscher who moved its adoption, which motion was seconded by Commissioner Sillman and carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Chairwoman Blake, Vice Chairwoman Sillman, Commissioner Doscher, Commissioner Adams, Commissioner Brookman, Commissioner Shaffer
Noes:
Absent: Commissioner Dale
Recused:
22+00 23+00 93+00 93+30
SAN GIMIGNANO DRIVE
X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X
X
X X X
X X
X
X X X X
X X X
X X X X
X X X
X X
X
X X X
X
X X X X
X X X
X X
X
X X X
X X X
X
X
X X X X X
X X X
X
X X
X
2726
25 28
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 1617
24 23
22 21
20 19
18 32
33 34
35 36
15 14
13 12
11 10
98 7
6 5
29 30
31 1
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
37 38 39
3 110.0' 102.9' 102.9' 102.9' 105.0' 105.0' 110.0' 110.0' 117.9' 110.0' 117.9' 117.9' 117.9' 125.0'
38.7' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 72.0'
55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 72.0' 105.0' 105.0' 56.4'
55.0' 55.0' 55.0'
55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 76.4'
52.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 52.0'
55.0' 55.0' 52.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 52.0' 102.9' 85.0' 85.0' 85.0'
52.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 52.0'
50.0' 50.0' 53.0' 50.0' 52.0' 72.0' 55.0' 55.0' 52.0' 55.0' 55.0'
90.1' 62.1' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.3' 122.9' 122.9' 125.0'
55.0' 41.0' 55.0' 55.0'
50.0' 50.0' 50.0' 97.9' 90.0'
110.0'
110.0'
90.0'
132.1' 105.0' 105.0'
55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 52.0' 85.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' N.A.P.O. CHURCHILL REV TR 62-082-010
BECERRA
62-072-009
SAMRA
62-082-001
INTERWEST
62-200-026
PANDIT
62-082-017
SOUZA REV TR
62-082-003
BARKLEY
62-082-012
ESPINOZA
62-061-015
HILL 06 TR
62-061-014
CHASTAIN
FLORES 62-061-011
62-082-013
HAASE
62-061-011
IANNIELLO
62-061-016
IANNIELLO
62-061-017
DANIK
62-091-009
GARDNER62-091-010
BAGRHIAY
62-081-008
BATHA
62-081-006
CHECHI
62-081-009
WATSON
62-081-010
MITCHELL
62-081-030
CHAVEZ
62-360-001
CSER 11 TR
62-360-056
ALCANTAR
62-360-039
GALAZ
062-360-038
014-151-011
TERRELL
62-071-034
GUERRERO
014-151-011
BILLIE KEITH WAY
WAYNE WAY
MILLIE DRIVE
ETHEL DRIVE
ETHEL DRIVE
COLUSA FRONTAGE ROAD
HOOPER ROAD
EL MARGARITA ROAD
1 2
3 BARKLEY
62-082-012
PITTMAN
62-200-027
55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 60.9' 72.0'
55.0' 72.0'
55.0' 69.0' 53.1' 85.1' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0' 105.0'
15.0' 168.0' 150.0' 150.0'
6 5
4 2
1 7
8 9 40 41 42
4 3
2 1 12 11 10
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
2 3
4 5
6 16 17 18 19 20
21 130.3' 62.1' 55.0 55.0' 55.0' 52.3' 55.0' 55.0' ' 55.0' 60.2' 60.6' 60.3' 124.8'
116.8'
111.6'
110.0'
109.8'
110.0'
110.0'
110.0'
110.0'
89.9' 55.0 55.0' 55.0' 73.2' 55.0' ' 55.3' 55.3' 55.3' 55.3' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 65.0' 70.0' 65.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 60.0' 60.0' 60.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 71.7' 118.6'
120.4'
119.6'
115.6'
110.0'
110.0'
110.0'
110.0'
110.0' 52.7' 55.1' 55.3' 55.5' 55.2' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 65.0' 70.0' 65.0' 55.0' 85.0' 85.0' 110.0'
110.0'
110.0'
110.0'
110.2'
112.9'
110.0'
110.0'
110.0'
110.0'
72.0'
105.5'
105.7'
105.9'
106.1'
106.2'
106.4'
106.6'
106.8'
106.9' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 63.5' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 55.0' 63.5' 107.2'
52.0' 85.0' POTENTIAL WATER QUALITY BASIN OR WATER QUALITY MANHOLE PRIOR TO LEAVING SUBDIVISION (PREFERRED SYSTEM IS THE MANHOLE)
NOT PART OF
10112
52.26 PM-C
BILLIE KEITH WAY
WAYNE WAY
MILLIE DRIVE
ETHEL DRIVE
ETHEL DRIVE
COLUSA FRONTAGE ROAD
HOOPER ROAD
EL MARGARITA ROAD
0 20' 40' 80' 160'
LOT SUMMARY*
VILLAGE NO. 1 = 42 LOTS 8.11 AC 5.18 DU/ACVILLAGE NO. 2 = 31 LOTS 5.62 AC 5.52 DU/ACVILLAGE NO. 3 = 23 LOTS 4.23 AC 5.44 DU/AC SUBTOTAL = 96 LOTS 17.96 AC 5.35 DU/AC
(RESIDENTIAL)
NOT PART OF = 03 PARCELS 6.63 AC
LOT 9 - POTENTIAL DETENTION POND 0.55 AC
SUBTOTAL = 7.18 AC
(NON-RESIDENTIAL)
TOTAL = 25.14 AC
*ALL ACREAGES AND DENSITIES EXCLUDE MAJOR ROADWAYS. THERE ARE NO MAJOR ROADWAYS ON THIS PROJECT.
LAND USE SUMMARY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:HE LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SUTTER, CITY OF YUBA CITY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:PARCEL ONE: (APN: 62-082-009 AND 62-082-014) A PORTION OF LOTS 22 AND 23 OF SUBDIVISION NO. 2 OF THE ELMER TRACT, IN THE CITY OF YUBA CITY, COUNTY OF SUTTER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED FEBRUARY 4, 1908 IN BOOK 1, PAGE 61 OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 23 AND RUNNING THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 23, A DISTANCE OF 156.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 23, A DISTANCE OF 340.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 23 AND LOT 22, A DISTANCE OF 200 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 23, A DISTANCE OF 340.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 22; AND THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 22, 44.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.PARCEL TWO: (APN: 62-082-011)LOT 24 OF SUBDIVISION NO. 2 OF THE ELMER TRACT, IN THE CITY OF YUBA CITY, COUNTY OF SUTTER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED FEBRUARY 4, 1908 IN BOOK 1, PAGE 61 OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO EARL D. LARSEN AND ROSETTA M. LARSEN, HIS WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS, IN DEED RECORDEDDECEMBER 13, 1963 IN BOOK 636, PAGE 346 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE WEST LINE OF LOT 24, AS SHOWN UPON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED "MAP OF SUBDIVISION NO. 2 OF THE ELMER TRACT", FILED FEBRUARY 4, 1908 AND RECORDED IN BOOK 1 OF SURVEYS, AT PAGE 61, SUTTER COUNTY RECORDS, DISTANT THEREON NORTH 1° 04' WEST, 145.0 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTINUING ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAIDLOT 24, NORTH 1° 04' WEST, 168.0 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE, RUNNING EASTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID WEST BOUNDARY LINE, ADISTANCE OF 150.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES, 168.0 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES 150.0 FEET TO THE POINT OFBEGINNING.PARCEL THREE: (APN: 62-082-015)LOTS 22 AND 23 OF SUBDIVISION NO. 2 OF THE ELMER TRACT, IN THE CITY OF YUBA CITY, COUNTY OF SUTTER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED FEBRUARY 4, 1908 IN BOOK 1, PAGE 61 OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
A PORTION OF LOTS 22 AND 23 OF SUBDIVISION NO. 2 OF THE ELMER TRACT, IN THE CITY OF YUBA CITY, COUNTY OF SUTTER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED FEBRUARY 4, 1908 IN BOOK 1, PAGE 61 OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 23 AND RUNNING THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 23, A DISTANCE OF 156.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 23, A DISTANCE OF 340.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 23 AND LOT 22, A DISTANCE OF 200 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 23, A DISTANCE OF 340.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 22; AND THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 22, 44.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Exp. 12-31-22
No. C52593
N
A
S
REGIST
M
E
RNAES
STAT
ERED
P
CI V I
. MI
OF COFES
IA
L
RD
A
LI FORN
IONAL
EN GINEER
SCALE 1' = 50'
LOCATION MAP
FIRE PROTECTION
CITY OF YUBA CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT
LAW ENFORCEMENT
CITY OF YUBA CITY POLICE
SANITARY SEWER
CITY OF YUBA CITY PUBLIC WORKS
DOMESTIC WATER
OLIVEHURST PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICT
STORM DRAINAGE
CITY OF YUBA CITY PUBLIC WORKS
AND SUTTER WATER AGENCY
ELECTRICITYPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRICNATURAL GAS (OPTIONAL)PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
COMMUNICATION
AT&T AND COMCAST
CABLE (OPTIONAL)COMCAST
PROJECT NOTES
GENERAL NOTES:
1. SUBDIVIDER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO PHASE DEVELOPMENT AND FILE MULTIPLE FINAL MAPS PURSUANT TO SECTION 66456.1 (A) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT.
2. A 12.0 FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SHALL BE LOCATED PROVIDED ON ALL STREETS WITH 10 FEET BEHIND SIDEWALK AND
2.0 FEET LOCATED UNDER SIDEWALK. ADJACENT TO CUL-DE-SAC BULBS THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SHALL BE 10 FEETBEHIND SIDEWALK UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.
3. THIS EXHIBIT IS FOR TENTATIVE MAP PURPOSES ONLY, ACTUAL DIMENSIONS, ROAD ALIGNMENTS, ACREAGE, AND YIELDS ARE TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO FINAL MAP.
4. THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT.
5. VILLAGE NUMBERING IS FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT INDICATE PHASING ORDER OF DEVELOPMENT.
ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT PHASING WILL BE ORDERLY AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT FINAL MAP AND/OR IMPROVEMENT PLAN STAGE.
6. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, SEPTIC TANKS, AND WELLS TO BE REMOVED OR DESTORYED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
7. STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED PURSUANT TO COUNTY OF YUBA CITY STANDARDS. ADDITIONAL DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS.
8. OWNERS, APPLICANT, ATTORNEY, ENGINEER, AND SURVEYOR SHALL RECEIVE ANY COMMUNICATIONS AND/OR NOTICES RELATED TO THIS PROJECT.
EXISTING USE
VACANT
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONLOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALPROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONLOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALEXISTING ZONINGR-1PROPOSED ZONINGR-1LEVEE PROTECTIONLEVEE DISTRICT NO. 9 OF SUTTER COUNTYELEMENTARTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
YUBA CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
YUBA CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
IRRIGATION DISTRICT
NONE - INDIVIDUAL WATER WELLS
OWNER
HENSON FAMILY LIVING TR2689 COLUSA HIGHWAY
YUBA CITY, CA 95991
CONTACT: MARY HENSON
PHONE: (530) XXX-XXXXAPPLICANTWESTMARK PARTNERS, L.P.4624 DUCKHORN DRIVE SACRAMENTO, CA 95834
CONTACT: MIKE SINGH
PHONE: (530) 682-6686
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR
MHM INCORPORATED
1204 E STREET, P.O. BOX B
MARYSVILLE, CA 95901
CONTACT: SEAN MINARD, P.E., P.L.S.
PHONE: (530) 742-6485ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.APN 62-082-009, 011, 014, AND 015AREA OF TENTATIVE MAP
25.14 GROSS ACRE (6.63 ACRES ARE NOT
PART OF THE PROJECT)
SURVEYORS STATEMENT:
I HEREBY STATE THAT ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD
ARE SHOWN AND LABELED PER PRELIMINARY TITLE
REPORT BY PLACER TITLE COMPANY ORDER NUMBERP-492574 DATED MAY 21, 2021.
SEAN MINARD, P.E. 52593, P.L.S. 8397
TEL: 530.742.6485
FAX: 530.742.5639
1204 E STREET, P.O. BOX B
MARYSVILLE, CA 95901
ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS SINCE 1892
JUNE 14, 2021 REVISED SEPTEMBER 27, 2021
YUBA CITY, CALIFORNIA
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION TRACT MAP
SM 21-001 (HENSON RANCH)
2INDICATES PROPOSED PHASE
CITY OF YUBA CITY APPROVAL:THE CITY OF YUBA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION HAS CONSIDERED AND APPROVED RESOLUTION 21-0XX APPROVING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 2021-001 DURING THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON ______________, 2021. ______________________________________________ CITY OF YUBA CITY DATE:
SCALE 1' = 1000'
HOOPER ROAD
RUTH AVENUE
HOOPER ROAD
BUTTE HOUSE ROAD
NO GEO WASH BLVD.
ROYO RANCHERO
EL MARGARITA ROAD
HARTER PARKWAY
CL
NOT TO SCALE
HOOPER ROAD (FRONTAGE ONLY)
EL MARGARITA ROAD (FRONTAGE ONLY)
B COLLECTOR - 50.0' R/W
20.5'
PSE
PL
0.5' 10.0'
PUE 5.0' 2.5'
25.0' ROADWAY
SIDEWALK
TYPE "A" ASPHALT
22.0' @ 2%
CLASS 2 A.B.
6.0'
12.0'
PUE
20.5'
PSE 0.5'
PL
2.5' 5.0'
25.0' ROADWAY
BARRIER CURB
& GUTTER
SIDEWALK
TYPE "A" ASPHALT
22.0' @ 2%
CLASS 2 A.B.
6.0'
ROLLED CURB
& GUTTER
5.0'
BIKE
LANE
11.0'
TRAVEL
LANE
8.0'
PARKING
5.0'
BIKE
LANE
11.0'
TRAVEL
LANE
8.0'
PARKING
6.0'
CLASS 2 A.B.
16.0' @ 2%
TYPE "A" ASPHALT
SIDEWALK
ROLLED CURB
& GUTTER
19.0' ROADWAY
4.0' 2.5'
12.0'
PUE
0.5'
10.0'
TRAVEL
LANE
8.0'
PARKING
PL CL
NOT TO SCALE
A ALL INTERIOR ROADS SERVICING 100 OR FEWER LOTS MINOR RESIDENTIAL - 38.0' R/W (DEATTACHED)
19.5'
PSE
DEATTACHED SIDEWALK OPTION. THEPLANTER STRIP SHALL ALSO BE USEDFOR STORM WATER MITIGATION. LOTDIMENSIONS BASED ON ATTACHED SIDEWALK.
PUE SHALL BE A TOTAL OF 12 FEET
WITH 10 FEET BEHIND SIDEWALK
AND 2 FEET UNDERSIDEWALK.
MINOR RESIDENTIAL - 46.0' R/W (ATTACHED)
A NOT TO SCALE ALL INTERIOR ROADS SERVICING 100 OR FEWER LOTS PL CL
8.0'
PARKING
10.0'
TRAVEL
LANE
0.5' 2.5'
23.0' ROADWAY
ROLLED CURB
& GUTTER
SIDEWALK
TYPE "A" ASPHALT
16.0' @ 2%
CLASS 2 A.B.
4.0'
6.0'
CLASS 2 A.B.
16.0' @ 2%
TYPE "A" ASPHALT
SIDEWALK
ROLLED CURB
& GUTTER
19.0' ROADWAY
2.5' 4.0'
12.0'
PUE
0.5'
10.0'
TRAVEL
LANE
8.0'
PARKING
19.5'
PSE
PL
12.0'
PUE
PL
8.0'
PARKING
10.0'
TRAVEL
LANE
0.5' 2.5'
23.0' ROADWAY
ROLLED CURB
& GUTTER
SIDEWALK
TYPE "A" ASPHALT
16.0' @ 2%
CLASS 2 A.B.
4.0'
12.0'
PUE
PUE SHALL BE A TOTAL OF 12 FEETWITH 10 FEET BEHIND SIDEWALK AND 2 FEET UNDERSIDEWALK.
10.0' TO 12.0' @ 2%
PUE SHALL BE A TOTAL OF 12 FEET
WITH 10 FEET BEHIND SIDEWALK
AND 2 FEET UNDERSIDEWALK.
1 CITY OF YUBA CITY
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 21-01
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
HENSON RANCH
APNs: 62-082-009, -011, -014, -015
NOTICE TO PROJECT APPLICANT
In accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), the imposition of fees, dedication, reservations or exactions for this project are subject to protest by the project applicant at the time of approval or conditional approval of the development or within ninety (90) calendar days after the date of imposition of fees, dedications, reservation, or exactions imposed on the development project. This notice does not apply to those fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions which were previously imposed and duly noticed; or, where no notice was previously required under the provisions of Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) in effect before January 1, 1997.
IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ CAREFULLY
Please note that this project is subject to a variety of discretionary conditions of approval. These include conditions based on adopted City plans and policies, those determined through tentative subdivision map review and environmental assessment essential to mitigate adverse effects on the environment including the health, safety, and welfare of the community, and recommended conditions for development that are not essential to health, safety, and welfare, but would on the whole enhance the project and its relationship to the neighborhood and environment.
Discretionary conditions of approval may be appealed. All code requirements, however, are mandatory and may only be modified by variance, provided the findings can be made.
All discretionary conditions of approval will ultimately be deemed mandatory unless appealed by the applicant to the City Council within 10 days after the decision by the Planning Commission. In the event you wish to appeal the Planning Commission’s decision or discretionary conditions of approval, you may do so by filing a written appeal with the City Clerk. The appeal shall state the grounds for the appeal and wherein the Commission failed to conform to the requirements of the zoning ordinance. This should include identification of the decision or action appealed and specific reasons why you believe the decision or action appealed should not be upheld.
These conditions are applicable to any person or entity making use of this tentative subdivision map, and references to “developer” or “applicant” herein also include any applicant, property owner, owner, leasee, operator, or any other person or entity making use of this tentative subdivision map.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The applicant/property owner agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, from any and all claims, damages, liability
2 or actions arising out of or connected with this Agreement, except to the extent such liabilities are caused by actions of the City.
2. The lands with a current general plan designation of Office and Office Park shown as ‘not a part of’ the project will not have development rights unless a Conditional Certificate of Compliance is processed for the subject area or as approved by the City Surveyor.
3. The lot design on the subdivision maps shall be designed in conformance with the TSM 21-01, as appropriate, and as approved by the Planning Commission.
4. The development and operation of the project shall comply with all CEQA mitigation measures identified in Environmental Assessment 21-02 dated October 20, 2021.
5. To limit visibility to provide privacy and to minimize conflicting views of adjacent properties, the Tentative Map dated June 14, 2021 Revised September 27, 2021 is restricted as follows:
a. Phase 1 lots – 2, 3 and 4 are to be restricted to single story construction or any back-facing window sills on the upper floor of a two-story residence are to be a minimum of 6.0 feet above the floor, or as otherwise approved by the Development Services Director
b. Phase 1 lots - 23 and 24 are to be restricted to single story construction. c. Phase 2 lot - 26 is to be restricted to single story construction or any back-facing window sills on the upper floor of a two-story residence are to be a minimum of
6.0 feet above the floor, or as otherwise approved by the Development Services Director.
d. Phase 3 lots – 22 and 23 are to be restricted to single story construction or any back-facing window sills on the upper floor of a two-story residence are to be a minimum of 6.0 feet above the floor, or as otherwise approved by the Development Services Director.
6. The Developer shall coordinate with United States Postal Service in regard to relocating the existing mailboxes, adjacent to the subdivision, located along the west side of El Margarita Road, to either a centralized mail delivery unit or to the east side of the road in coordination with applicable property owners. On site mail delivery is to be maintained throughout construction.
7. If Phase 3 develops prior to Phases 1 or 2, then Ethel Drive will need a temporary cul-de-sac at the west end (located in Phase 2). In addition, a fire hydrant will need to be installed midway down the length of Ethel Drive, or at a location determined by the Yuba City Fire Marshal.
8. Road improvements along Hooper Road, from the north boundary of the tentative map to the intersection with North Colusa Frontage Road, along the east right of way, are to be constructed including road widening, curb, and gutter, along the entire length of Hooper Road, including the curb return and ADA ramp at the intersection of Hooper Road and North Colusa Frontage Road or as otherwise determined by the Public Works Director. Sidewalk improvements shall be provided from north boundary line to the southern boundary of Phase 1 Lot 37. No sidewalk shall be
3 required on the “Not Part Of” lands. Necessary right of way and easements are to be dedicated with Phase One of the Final Map.
9. Road work adjacent to APN 62-082-010 (between lots 31 and 32 of Phase 1) is to be constructed. Work is to include a widened bike lane, curb, gutter, and sidewalk within the existing right of way, with a modified road section as approved by the Public Works Director to facilitate construction. Reimbursement fee credits for qualifying work will be determined in the applicable subdivision/improvement agreement with Developer prior to construction.
Road work shall be constructed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy in Phase 1, or as otherwise determined by the Public Works Director.
10. Road improvements along El Margarita Road, from the north boundary of the tentative map to the intersection with North Colusa Frontage Road, along the west right of way, are to be constructed including road widening, curb, and gutter, along the entire length of El Margarita Road, including the curb return and ADA ramp at the intersection of El Margarita Road and North Colusa Frontage Road or as otherwise determined by the Public Works Director. Sidewalk improvements shall be provided from north boundary line to the southern boundary of Phase 3 Lot 1. No sidewalk shall be required on the “Not Part Of” lands. Necessary right of way and easements are to be dedicated with Phase One of the Final Map.
11. The Developer shall, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy of the first residence in Phase 2 (as said Phase is shown on Tentative Subdivision Map dated June 14, 2021 Revised September 27, 2021), construct a solid 6-foot high chain link fence across the right-of-way of Ethel Drive and Millie Drive connecting with the adjoining six-foot high private fences. This fencing shall be constructed in addition to the standard dead-end barricade. The fence and barricade shall be maintained by the City via the lighting and landscape maintenance district.
12. To help contain fugitive dust, construction sites shall be watered down during the construction phase of the project or as directed by the Public Works Department.
13. Paved streets shall be swept frequently (water sweeper with reclaimed water recommended; wet broom) if soil material has been carried onto adjacent paved, public thoroughfares from the project site.
14. The Developer, at their expense, shall be solely responsible for all quality control associated with the project. The quality control shall include, but is not limited to, the following: survey work, potholing existing utilities, all geotechnical testing, soil reports, concrete testing, asphalt testing, and any other required special testing/inspections.
The City will only perform necessary testing to assure compliance.
15. Storage of construction material is not allowed in the travel way.
16. The only hard surface (concrete or pavers) that can be placed in the street planter area other than the standard driveway serving the residence is 18” wide strips to accommodate the wheel path of vehicles unless authorized/approved by the Public Works Director.
17. A Subdivision Agreement outlining any costs (hot tap, connection fee, fair share contribution, etc.) associated with the development shall be accepted by the City prior
4 to recordation of map, or prior to approval of the Improvement Plans, whichever comes first.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT
18. The improvement plans for the development of the subject property shall include all measures required to ensure that no increased drainage runoff resulting from the development of the property flow onto the adjacent lands or that the development will not impede the drainage from those properties. The rear yards and/or side yards of the lots that are created by this subdivision that are adjacent to existing residential development shall have the same finish grade elevation as those lots within tolerances as approved by the Public Works Department. If retaining walls are required they shall be constructed of concrete or masonry block.
19. A master grading plan for all phases of the subdivision shall be submitted to the Public Works Department as part of the improvement plans with the first subdivision phase.
PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
20. A fair share analysis shall be prepared by a traffic engineer. The analysis should determine fair share amounts related to mitigations in previous traffic studies as approved by the Public Works Director, with a focus primarily on the following intersections:
• State Route 20 / N. Colusa Frontage Road and N. George Washington Blvd. • North Colusa Frontage Road and Hooper Road
• North Colusa Frontage Road and El Margarita Road
• Hooper Road and Jefferson Avenue
• Any other locations deemed appropriate by the traffic engineer or Public Works Director
Developer is to construct and/or pay all determined proportional share amounts of required improvements and/or fees related to mitigating identified traffic impacts that are in addition to the City’s impact fee program.
21. Final Improvement Plans are to incorporate traffic calming measures along Ethel Drive, including curb extensions (bulb-outs / chokers) at determined locations to be approved by the Development Services Director.
22. Obtain all necessary approvals from City, State, and Federal agencies, utilities and other effected parties that are required for the project including, but not limited to, the preparation of drawings, studies, reports and permit applications, and payment of fees. Prior to City approval of Improvement Plans the Developer shall provide evidence, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, that all such obligations have been met.
23. The contractor shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the City prior to performing any work within public rights of way.
24. The plans shall indicate the locations of all prior hull deposit pits, detention pond(s), all septic and leach field areas, and all wells. All pits and ponds are to be filled with engineered fill.
5 25. Hooper Road shall be widened to a half-width (centerline to back of curb) of 24.5 feet.
Right-of-way shall be dedicated to a width of 25.0 feet together with a 20.5-foot Public Service Easement (PSE) behind the right-of-way. Frontage improvements shall include street section, barrier curb, gutter, 6.0-foot landscaped parkway strip (measured from back of curb), 5.0-foot wide sidewalk, street trees, and streetlights.
A 12.0 foot wide Public Utility Easement (PUE) shall be located adjacent to the sidewalk with 2.0 foot located underneath the sidewalk, or as otherwise determined by the Public Works Director. Adjacent to APN 62-082-010, the road section width and specifications can be modified as approved by the Public Works Director to facilitate construction within the existing right of way. The sidewalk can be attached and there shall be no requirement for a PSE, street trees, street lights, or landscaped parkway strip. Work is to include relocating the existing mailbox to the back of sidewalk or incorporated into the centralized mail delivery unit.
26. El Margarita Road shall be widened to a half-width (centerline to back of curb) of 24.5 feet. Right-of-way shall be dedicated to a width of 25.0 feet together with a 20.5-foot PSE behind the right-of-way. Frontage improvements shall include street section, barrier curb, gutter, 6.0-foot landscaped parkway strip (measured from back of curb), 5.0-foot wide sidewalk, street trees, and streetlights. A 12.0-foot wide PUE shall be located adjacent to the sidewalk with 2.0 foot located underneath the sidewalk, or as otherwise determined by the Public Works Director.
27. The Developer has two roadway design options for of the interior residential streets:
a. Detached sidewalk -- Streets shall be designed/constructed to a width of 37.0 feet back of curb to back of curb with parking permitted on both sides. Rightof-way shall be dedicated to a width of 38.0 feet together with a 19.5-foot PSE behind the right-of-way. Frontage improvements shall include street section, curb, gutter, 6.0-foot wide landscape parkway strip (measured from back of curb), 4.0-foot wide sidewalk, street trees, and streetlights. A 12.0-foot wide PUE shall be located adjacent to the sidewalk with 2.0-foot located underneath the sidewalk.
i. The landscape plan for the front yard, including the area between the sidewalk and curb, shall be handled by each individual lot improvement. The irrigation system shall be designed to accommodate the street tree and shall meet the City’s Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.
ii. The landscaping in the parkway strip is to have a coordinated theme referenced on the public improvement plans, or as approved by the Development Service Director.
b. Attached sidewalk -- Streets shall be designed/constructed to a width of 37.0 feet back of curb to back of curb with parking permitted on both sides. Rightof-way shall be dedicated to a width of 46.0 feet. Frontage improvements shall include street section, curb, gutter, a 4.0-foot wide attached sidewalk, and streetlights. A 12.0-foot wide PUE shall be located adjacent to the sidewalk with 2.0 foot located underneath the sidewalk. i. At minimum one City approved street tree shall be planted in the front yard of each lot. Any variation as to location of tree and/or type of tree shall be approved by the Development Services Director.
6 ii. The landscape plan for the front yard shall be handled by each individual lot improvement.
28. The Developer shall comply with all City requirements related to drainage, including submittal of a drainage plan for any drainage improvements for the proposed development. A drainage analysis, along with calculations, shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. The analysis shall include, but is not limited to:
a. Grading and drainage plan showing the proposed drainage conveyance and storage system.
b. Supporting calculations demonstrating adequacy of conveyance capacity and storage volume. The calculation analysis shall meet the requirements of the Yuba City Basin Drainage Study.
c. Storm Drain Collection Systems- For the design of all pipeline conveyance facilities, the Hydraulic Grade Line (HGL) shall be maintained a minimum of one foot below the gutter flow line of all drain inlets and at least one foot below all maintenance hole rims during a 10-year, 24-hour storm event. The storm drain minimum pipe size shall be 12 inches. The minimum velocity shall be 2 fps.
d. Street Flow-The street system shall be designed to convey the 100-year, 24- hour runoff while maintaining a water surface at least 1 foot below the adjacent building pad elevations (or alternatively, the building pad elevations shall be at least 1 foot above the 100-year water level). The grading plan shall ensure that the 100-year, 24-hour runoff can be conveyed through the development and to the receiving drainage facility.
e. Drainage systems (pipes and street systems) shall be designed to accommodate the runoff from the ultimate development of the entire upstream watershed.
f. Water Quality – Water quality basin(s) shall meet State Water Resource Board requirements for water quality. The water quality basin can be incorporated into a detention pond, designed as an individual pond, included in a water quality manhole system, or as approved by the Public Works Director.
g. Detention Basins - A 100-year, 4-day storm shall be used for sizing detention storage facilities. The detention basin release rate from a 100-year, 24-hour storm after development must be equal to or lower than the runoff rate from the detention basin's tributary area before development. h. The Drainage Study shall be completed and stamped by a Professional Engineer and determined by the City Engineer and the Sutter County Water Agency Engineer to be comprehensive, accurate, and adequate.
29. Only one detention pond and/or water quality basin shall be utilized if required to meet stormwater requirements throughout the entire subdivision. Mechanical water quality devices and/or oversized pipes are preferred. Should a basin be necessary it is to include, but not be limited to a vehicle pull out area, solid masonry wall adjacent to residential, decorative perimeter fencing with accessible sized gate, landscaping, and access to the inlet and outlet in the basin as approved by the Public Works Director. Maintenance costs associated with the basin and/or mechanical water quality device(s) are to be included in the applicable Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District.
7 30. Development shall comply with Yuba City’s stormwater requirements and PostConstruction Standards Plan. The Post Construction information can be found here:
https://www.yubacity.net/city_hall/departments/public_works/engineering/stormwate r_management
31. The Developer shall comply with all Sutter County requirements related to drainage, including submittal of a drainage plan for any drainage improvements that utilize County facilities for approval by Sutter County Public Works Director. The Developer shall coordinate with the County if the storm drain under Hooper Road, and the ditches to the west, are to be utilized as part of the drainage improvements.
32. All development shall be designed to local, state, and federal flood standards.
33. The structural section of all road improvements shall be designed using the Caltrans empirical R-value method. A geotechnical investigation shall determine the R-value of the existing soil in accordance with the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. The structural section shall be designed to the following standards:
a. Use 3” minimum for residential, 4” minimum for collectors and 5” minimum for arterials, of ‘Type A’ asphaltic concrete over Class 2 aggregate base (the thickness of the base shall be designed to the R-value of the soil) b. Use a traffic index of 6 for residential streets
c. Use a traffic index of 7 for collector streets
d. Use a traffic index of 10 for arterial streets
A copy of the geotechnical investigation, including R-value determination, test locations and structural section calculations, shall be submitted with the first improvement plan check.
34. Striping, pavement markings and traffic signage shall be provided on all streets as necessary and as required by the Public Works Department. Signage restricting parking and red painted curbing shall be installed where appropriate. Speed limit signs shall be installed at locations determined by the Public Works Department. All required speed limit signs shall be shown on the Improvement Plans.
35. The street trees and street lighting are public improvements which shall meet the Parks Division Planting Standards and City Standard Details and be included in the Improvement Plans and Specifications for the subdivision when the improvement plans are submitted for the first improvement plan check. Only one tree species shall be planted on any street.
36. The Improvement Plans shall show provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery units in the PUE. Developer shall provide a concrete base for placement of the centralized mail delivery unit. Specifications and location of such base shall be determined pursuant to the applicable requirements of the Postal Service and the City Public Works Department, with due consideration for street light location, traffic safety, security and consumer convenience.
37. Required Improvement Plan Notes:
a. "Any excess materials shall be considered the property of the contractor/owner and shall be disposed of away from the job site in accordance with applicable local, state and federal regulations."
8 b. "During construction, the Contractor shall be responsible for controlling noise, odors, dust and debris to minimize impacts on surrounding properties and roadways. The Contractor shall be responsible for all construction equipment to be equipped with manufacturers approved muffler baffles. Failure to do so may result in the issuance of an order to stop work.”
c. “If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Sutter County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Police Department, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies.”
d. "The Contractor(s) shall be required to maintain traffic flow on affected roadways during non-working hours, and to minimize traffic restriction during construction.
The Contractor shall be required to follow traffic safety measures in accordance with the “California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, latest edition.” The City of Yuba City emergency service providers shall be notified, at least two working days in advance, of proposed construction scheduled by the contractor(s).”
e. “Soil shall not be treated with lime or other cementitious material without prior express permission by the Public Works Department.”
f. “Where an excavation for a trench and/or structure is five (5) feet deep or more, the contractor shall conform to O.S.H.A. requirements. The contractor shall provide a copy of the approved O.S.H.A. permit, and shoring details and calculations prepared by California licensed structural engineer to the Public Works Department, prior to beginning construction.”
PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
38. All existing well(s), septic tank(s), and service lines shall be destroyed in accordance with the requirements of the Sutter County Environmental Health and Yuba City Building Departments, respectively. Connections shall be made to public sewer and water. The Developer shall pay all applicable fees.
39. In addition to the street lights provided on the interior streets, street lights shall be installed along the east side of Hooper Road (except adjacent to APN 62-082-010), in front of the commercial property on the north side of North Colusa Frontage Road, and along the west side of El Margarita Road. Where there are existing lights on the opposite side of Hooper Road and/or El Margarita Road, the new light locations should be staggered between them.
40. Prior to final paving, the Developer shall vacuum test all manholes to ensure no leakage will occur.
41. Prior to final paving, the Developer shall hydroflush, and televise, all storm drain mains and all sewer mains. In addition, prior to the City’s acceptance of the subdivision improvements, and at the Public Works Department’s discretion, the storm sewer and sewer mains shall be re-hydroflushed.
42. The contractor shall maintain record drawings of the improvements and keep them on site at all times. When the project is complete, the contractor shall deliver a marked set of plans to the Engineer of Record. The Engineer of Record shall update the improvement plans with the record information. Once the changes have been
9 added to the plans, the Engineer of Record shall submit both an electronic copy (Civil 3D version 2017 or newer) and a hard copy to the City. The City will not accept the completion of the improvements until the electronic copy and hard copy have been submitted.
43. The existing power poles along the property on Hooper Road shall be placed underground, or addressed in accordance with the City’s Overhead Utility Policy adopted March 17, 2020. The total lineal foot length of overhead lines along Hooper Road is determined to be 1,006 lineal feet or as otherwise determined by the Public Works Director.
44. All public street lighting shall be dedicated to the City of Yuba City.
PRIOR TO FINAL MAP RECORDATION
45. The residential portion of the development shall pay for operations and/or maintenance for police, fire, parks, drainage, and ongoing street maintenance costs.
This condition may be satisfied through participation in a Mello-Roos CFD, by payment of cash in an amount agreed to by the City, by another secure funding mechanism acceptable to the City, or by some combination of those mechanisms.
The City shall be reimbursed actual costs associated with the formation of, or annexation to, the district. The property shall annex in to an existing CFD.
46. The property shall petition for formation of a Zone of Benefit of the Yuba City Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District for the purpose of maintaining; street trees which are to be planted along all streets, street lights, fencing, and any detention / water quality basin(s) or devices. The Engineering Division shall be reimbursed actual costs associated with the formation of the district.
47. Should a detention pond or water quality basin be utilized, the basin parcel(s) shall be dedicated to the City of Yuba City.
48. All public street lighting shall be dedicated to the City of Yuba City.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT
49. The Developer’s Superintendent/Representative shall submit three (3) sets of Pacific Gas and Electric approved utility plans showing joint trench locations and distribution lines prior to issuance of first building permit for each phase of construction.
50. The Developer shall pay all applicable Sutter County Water Agency connection fees and maintenance and operation fees, and entering into an agreement with Sutter County providing participation in a zone of benefit, drainage district, agency, service area or any other public entity for the financing of construction and maintenance of a drainage system, as determined applicable by Sutter County.
51. At the commercial properties, cross access easements shall be reserved in deeds or other acceptable format to facilitate all shared underground utilities, ingress and egress, parking, drainage, refuse collection, landscaping, and the maintenance thereof to the benefit of all parcels involved in the division. The document is to be recorded and tied to the divided parcels.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
10 52. The curb, gutter, sidewalk, and lot drainage shall be inspected and approved by the City. Any curb, gutter and sidewalk which is not in accord with City standards or is damaged before or during construction, shall be replaced. All sidewalks along the City right-of-way shall be free of any non-control joint cracking. In addition, any concrete with cracks, chips, blemishes, and spalling greater than an inch in diameter shall be replaced from control joint to control joint.
53. All street lighting shall be constructed per the Improvement Plans and energized prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy or as approved by the Development Services Director.
54. Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, all underground utilities, public improvements, and site improvements, including rough grading, shall be completed in accordance with City requirements.
MITIGATION MEASURES
Impact Mitigation Measure Responsible
Party Timing
3.7 Geology
and Soils
Paleontological Mitigation Measure 1:
Mitigation Measure # 1 shall be placed as
a note on the Demolition and Grading
Plans. If paleontological resources are
found, the construction manager shall halt
all activity and immediately contact the
Development Services Department at 530-
822-5145.
Mitigation shall be conducted as follows:
1. Identify and evaluate
paleontological resources by
intense field survey in the vicinity
that potential paleontological
resource was found, as
determined by the paleontologist;
2. Assess effects on identified sites;
3. Consult with the
institutional/academic
paleontologists conducting
research investigations within the
geological formations that are
slated to be impacted;
4. Obtain comments from the
researchers;
5. Comply with researchers’
recommendations to address any
significant adverse effects where
determined by the City to be
feasible.
In considering any suggested mitigation
proposed by the consulting paleontologist,
the City’s Community Development
Developer,
Public Works
Dept.,
Development
Services Dept.
During
construction
phase
11 Impact Mitigation Measure Responsible
Party Timing
Department Staff shall determine whether
avoidance is necessary and feasible in light
of factors such as the nature of the find,
project design, costs, Specific or General
Plan policies and land use assumptions,
and other considerations. If avoidance is
unnecessary or infeasible, other
appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery)
shall be instituted. Work may proceed on
other parts of the project site while
mitigation for paleontological resources is
carried out.
3.8. Greenhouse
Gases
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation 1: The site
grading process shall comply with the GHG
Reduction Measures provided in the
adopted Yuba City Resource Efficiency
Plan.
Development
Services Dept.
Prior to
issuance of
building
permits.
3.18. Tribal
Cultural
Resources
Tribal Cultural Resources Mitigation 1:
Post Ground Disturbance A minimum of
seven days prior to beginning earthwork,
clearing, and grubbing, or other soil
disturbing activities, the applicant shall
notify lead agency of the proposed
earthwork start-date. The lead agency
shall contact the United Auburn Indian
Community (UAIC) with the proposed
earthwork start-date and a UAIC Tribal
Representative or Tribal Monitor shall be
invited to inspect the project site, including
any soil piles, trenches, or other disturbed
areas, within the first five days of
groundbreaking activity, or as appropriate
for the type and size of the project. During
this inspection, a UAIC Tribal
Representative or Tribal Monitor may
provide an on-site meeting for construction
personnel information on TCRs and
workers awareness brochure.
If any TCRs are encountered during this
initial inspection, or during any subsequent
construction activities, work shall be
suspended within 100 feet of the find and
measures included in Cultural Resources
Mitigation Measure 2, below:
Unanticipated Discoveries shall be
implemented. Preservation in place is the
preferred alternative under CEQA and
Developer,
Public Works
Dept.,
Development
Services Dept.
During
construction
phase
12 Impact Mitigation Measure Responsible
Party Timing
UAIC protocols, and every effort must be
made to preserve the resources in place,
including through project redesign.
The contractor shall implement any
measures deemed by CEQA lead agency
to be necessary and feasible to preserve in
place, avoid, or minimize significant effects
to the resources, including the use of paid
Native American Monitor during ground
disturbing activities.
Tribal Cultural Resources Mitigation 2:
Unanticipated Discoveries: If any
suspected TCRs are discovered during
ground disturbing construction activities, all
work shall cease within 100 feet of the find,
or an agreed upon distance based on the
project area and nature of the find. A Tribal
Representative from a California Native
American Tribe that is traditionally and
culturally affiliated with a geographic area
shall be immediately notified and shall
determine if the find is a TCR (PRC 21074).
The Tribal Representative will make
recommendations for further evaluation
and treatment as necessary.
Preservation in place is the preferred
alternative under CEQA and UAIC
protocols, and every effort must be made
to preserve the resources in place,
including through project redesign.
Culturally appropriate treatment may be,
but is not limited to, processing materials
for reburial, minimizing handling of cultural
objects, leaving objects in place within the
landscape, returning objects to a location
within the project area where they will not
be subject to future impacts. The Tribe
does not consider curation of TCR’s to be
appropriate or respectful and request that
materials not be permanently curated,
unless approved by the Tribe.
The contractor shall implement any
measures deemed by the CEQA lead
agency to be necessary and feasible to
preserve in place, avoid, or minimize
impacts to the resource, including but
limited to, facilitating the appropriate tribal
treatment of the find, as necessary.
13 Impact Mitigation Measure Responsible
Party Timing
Treatment that preserves or restores the
cultural character and integrity of a Tribal
Cultural Resource may include Tribal
monitoring, culturally appropriate recovery
of cultural objects, and reburial of cultural
objects or cultural soil.
Work at the discovery location cannot
resume until all necessary investigation
and evaluation of the discovery under the
requirements of CEQA, including AB 523
has been satisfied.
Project CO. RCVD. BY DATE
Henson Ranch Phase 1 Offsite Improvements - APN 62-082-010 Frontage Sutter S.M. Minard 29-Aug-22 MHM PROJECT NO. QTY. BY IN CONST. INDEX
S. Mallen 25-Aug-22
96 Lots QTY. CHK. OUT BLDG. INDEX
J. Mallen 29-Aug-22
Item
No. Item Description Estimated
Quantity
Unit Unit Price
($/Unit)
Amount
($)
Bid Schedule A - Henson Ranch Phase 1 Offsite Improvements - APN 62-082-010 Frontage 1 Mobilization/Demobilization 1 LS 600.00 $ 600.00 $ Road 2 Class 2 Aggregate Base (14-Inch- Road Section) 170 TON 30.00 $ 5,100.00 $ Road 3 Asphalt Concrete (Type A) (4-Inch - Road Section) 40 TON 123.25 $ 4,930.00 $ Road 4 Minor Concrete (Sidewalks YC ST8 /ST9) (4-Inch) 840 SF 6.10 $ 5,124.00 $ Road 5 Class 2 Aggregate Base (4 Inch under sidewalk) 20 TON 40.00 $ 800.00 $ Road 6 Minor Concrete (YC ST4 Barrier Curb) 170 LF $ 4,505.00 26.50 $ Road 7 Standard Driveway (Extra Forming Cost) 2 EA 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 $ Road 8 Pavement Delineation (Restriping) 170 LF 4.00 $ 680.00 $ Road $ 24,739.00 9 Project SWPPP & Erosion Control (Street Sweeping) 1 LS 500.00 $ 500.00 $ SWPPP 500.00 $ Subtotal Contract Items A = $ 25,239.00
Subtotal Contract Item A = $ 25,239.00
Project Manager @ 0.5% = 126.20
City Plan Check @ 1.5% = 378.59
City Inspection @ 2.0% = 504.78
Preliminary Engineering @ 0.5% = 126.20
Design Engineering and Surveying @ 3.0% = 757.17
Construction Surveying @ 2.5% = 630.98
Grand Total = $27,762.90
*** For Budget Purposes = $27,800.00
21-154
21154Estimate.xlsx\62‐082‐010 Improvements Page 1 Page 67 of 728 EXHIBIT “B”
ATTACHMENT 2
20 HO
OPER
R
D
EL M
A
R
G
A
R
TI A
R
D
BR
Y
N
M
AW
R
D
R
COLUSA FRONTAGE RD
SERENA DR
SPIRIT DR
SOMBRA CT
SERENA
C
T
MONROE RD
SAN NICCOLO DR
SAN GIMIGNANO DR
EL M
A
R
G
A
RITA
R
D
20 COLUSA FRONTAGE RD
¶
Figure 1: Location Map: Henson Ranch
Tentative Subdivision Map 21-01
Project Site
1 inch = 300 feet
Agenda Item 6
CITY OF YUBA CITY
STAFF REPORT
Date: February 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Public Works Department
Presentation By: Ben Moody, Public Works & Development Services Director Summary
Subject: Local Highway Safety Improvement Program Project Awards Recommendation: A. Authorize the Finance Director to make a supplemental appropriation of $3,164,260 in Highway Safety Improvement Program grant funding to Account No. 921314 (Citywide Signal Hardware Upgrades), 921315 (Citywide Sign Upgrades & Audit), 921316 (Ped Safety Crosswalk Upgrades), 921317 (SHS Signal Hardware Upgrades), and 921318 (Local Roadway Safety Plan) B. Authorize the Finance Director to transfer $23,840 from Account No. 911253 (2018 Safe Routes to School Plan) to Account No. 911314 (Citywide Signal Hardware Upgrades) and $8,000 from Account No. 921253 (2018 Safe Routes to School Plan) to Account No. 921318 (Local Roadway Safety Plan) Fiscal Impact: $3,196,100 in total cost for five transportation safety projects. • $3,164,260 – Highway Safety Improvement Program Grant Funds • $31,840 – Local Match (Streets and Roads and TDA Funds) Purpose:
To prepare and deliver transportation projects in accordance with the Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) guidelines to improve safety in the City.
Council's Strategic Goal:
This project addresses City Council’s Strategic Goal of improving the City’s Infrastructure.
Background:
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) HSIP aims to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. In the HSIP Cycle 10 Call-for-Projects, 429 applications were received requesting $489.8 million in funds. 266 projects, totaling $227.6 million in HSIP funds, were selected for funding.
The City of Yuba City was awarded $3,196,100 for the development of five transportation safety projects:
• Citywide Signal Hardware Upgrades: The project will improve signal hardware at 56 intersections throughout the City. Improvements will include the installation of new reflective
backplates and upgrades to bulbs and lenses. Total project cost: $571,000 ($571,000 HSIP funds, $23,840 Local Funds Match).
• Roadway Safety Signing Audit and Upgrades: The project will evaluate roadway signing on critical corridors in the City for safety and generate the necessary information and prioritization to proceed with signage replacement and installation. Total project cost $1,835,400 ($1,835,400 HSIP funds, No Local Funds Match Required).
• Pedestrian Safety Crosswalk Upgrades: The project will improve crosswalks at 15 unsignalized intersections, primarily near schools. Improvements will include the installation of high visibility striping to crosswalks, advance stop bars, and yield lines. Total project cost $199,100 ($199,100 HSIP funds, No Local Funds Match Required).
• SHS Signal Hardware Upgrades: The project will improve signal hardware at 17 intersections on the State Highway System throughout the City. Improvements will include the installation of new reflective backplates and upgrades to bulbs and lenses. Total project cost $510,600 ($510,600 HSIP funds, No Local Funds Match Required).
• Local Roadway Safety Plan: The plan will create a framework to systematically identify, analyze, and prioritize safety improvements on roads in Yuba City. Total project cost $80,000 ($72,000 HSIP funds, $8,000 Local Funds Match).
Analysis:
The HSIP funding will allow the City to develop and construct safety projects identified in the City’s Safe Routes to School Plan and Systemic Safety Analysis Report. No other funds have been budgeted for these projects and implementation of them is possible with HSIP funds.
Fiscal Impact:
The City will be reimbursed a total of $3,196,100 from Caltrans. Streets and Roads ($23,580) and Transportation Development Act ($8,000) funding from CIP Project No. 1253 (Safe Routes to School Plan) will be transferred to provide the local match funds for the projects that require it.
Alternatives:
Do not accept the grant funds and direct staff to research alternative funding.
Recommendation:
A. Authorize the Finance Director to make a supplemental appropriation of $3,164,260 in Highway Safety Improvement Program grant funding to Account No. 921314 (Citywide Signal Hardware Upgrades), 921315 (Citywide Sign Upgrades & Audit), 921316 (Ped Safety Crosswalk Upgrades), 921317 (SHS Signal Hardware Upgrades), and 921318 (Local Roadway Safety Plan).
B. Authorize the Finance Director to transfer $23,840 from Account No. 911253 (2018 Safe Routes to School Plan) to Account No. 911314 (Citywide Signal Hardware Upgrades) and $8,000 from Account No. 921253 (2018 Safe Routes to School Plan) to Account No. 921318 (Local Roadway Safety Plan).
Attachments:
1. Resolution
Prepared By: Submitted By:
David Giongco
Deputy Public Works Director - Engineering
Diana Langley
City Manager
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUBA CITY
AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY
APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE AWARD OF LOCAL HIGHWAY SAFETY
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Yuba City requested California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), Cycle 10, funds for five transportation safety projects:
WHEREAS, Caltrans awarded a total of $3,196,100 to the following projects:
Citywide Signal Hardware Upgrades ($571,000)
Roadway Safety Signing Audit and Upgrades ($1,835,400)
Pedestrian Safety Crosswalk Upgrades ($199,000)
SHS Signal Hardware Upgrades ($510,600)
Local Roadway Safety Plan ($72,000); and
WHEREAS, the City of Yuba City is required to provide a local match for the following projects:
Citywide Signal Hardware Upgrades ($23,840)
Local Roadway Safety Plan ($8,000).
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Yuba City as follows:
A. The City Council authorizes the Finance Director to make a supplemental appropriation of $3,164,260 in Highway Safety Improvement Program grant funding to Account No. 921314 (Citywide Signal Hardware Upgrades), 921315 (Citywide Sign Upgrades & Audit), 921316 (Ped Safety Crosswalk Upgrades), 921317 (SHS Signal Hardware Upgrades), and 921318 (Local Roadway Safety Plan).
B. The City Council authorizes the Finance Director to transfer $23,840 from Account No. 911253 (2018 Safe Routes to School Plan) to Account No. 911314 (Citywide Signal Hardware Upgrades) and $8,000 from Account No. 921253 (2018 Safe Routes to School Plan) to Account No. 921318 (Local Roadway Safety Plan).
The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Yuba City at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7
th day of February, 2023.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Wade Kirchner, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ciara Wakefield, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
COUNSEL FOR YUBA CITY:
Shannon Chaffin, City Attorney
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
Attachment:
Exhibit A – HSIP Cycle 10 Project Awards – Yuba City
Project List for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 10 (Sort by Caltrans District and Agency Name)
* Application Category: BCR = Benefit-Cost Ratio; SA-PedCrossing = Set-aside for Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements; SA-Guardrail = Set-aside for Guardrail Upgrade; SA-Edgeline = Set-aside for Installing Edgelines.
No. Unique
Project ID Original Application ID Caltrans District Agency Name MPO Project Title Location of Work Description of Work Project Cost HSIP Funds (State) Application Category* 20 H10-03-010 03-Folsom-02 3 Folsom SACOG
Install delineators, reflectors
and/or object markers, and
edgeline rumble
strips/stripes.
American River Canyon Dr - Oak Canyon Wy and Canyon Rim Dr; Folsom Bd - US-50 and Iron Pt Rd; Glenn Dr - Sibley St and Folsom Bd; Blue Ravine Rd - Crossing Wy and Riley St; Folsom Auburn Rd; Prairie City Road; E Bidwell St - US-50 and Mangini Pk.
Install delineators, reflectors and object markers (with retroreflectivity) on the sides of roads, and install rumble strip along the edges of the roadway segments.
$ 366,600 $ 366,600 BCR
21 H10-03-011 03-Folsom-03 3 Folsom SACOG
Median Barrier,
Dynamic/Variable Speed
Warning Sign, Delineators,
Reflectors, and/or Object
Markers
Folsom Lake Xing - Folsom Dam Rd and Johnny Cash Trail
entrance; E Natoma St - Folsom Lake Xing and Gionata Wy; E Natoma St - Cimmaron Cir and Fargo Wy; Folsom Auburn Rd - Pinebrook Rd and Folsom Dam Rd.
Construct median barrier, install dynamic/variable speed warning signs, and delineators, reflectors, and/or object markers (with retro-reflectivity).
$ 1,031,400 $ 1,031,400 BCR
22 H10-03-012 03-Glenn County-1 3 Glenn County RURAL Forest Highway 7 Guardrail Replace
Forest Highway 7 (FH7) west of State Route 162 in western Glenn County.
Upgrade existing, damaged, and destroyed guardrail to current standards. $ 3,636,400 $ 1,000,000 SA-Guardrail
23 H10-03-013 03-Grass Valley-1 3 Grass Valley RURAL Ped Crossing Set-aside Various locations throughout the City of Grass Valley. Areas include crossings adjacent to city schools, parks and commercial areas.
Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs), pavement striping and markings, pedestrian crossing signs, as well as a raised crosswalk and curb ramps.
$ 250,000 $ 250,000 SAPedCrossing
24 H10-03-014 03-Nevada County-1a 3 Nevada County RURAL 2022 Nevada County
Thermoplastic and MMA
Safety Project
Approximately 21.7 miles of road on: Burma Rd, Dog Bar Rd, Lower Colfax Rd, McCourtney Rd, Pleasant Valley Rd, Squirrel Creek Rd, Boulder St, Donner Pass Rd, Glenshire Dr, Gracie Rd, Hirschdale Rd, and Lake Vera Purdon Rd.
Provide thermoplastic striping and markings and pavement markers to lower elevation roads. Provide MMA striping and markings to higher elevation roads that are subject to frequent plowing and sanding.
$ 949,100 $ 949,100 BCR
25 H10-03-015 03-Nevada County-2a 3 Nevada County RURAL 2022 High Friction Surface Treatment Project Nineteen curves throughout Nevada County. Apply High Friction Surface Treatment (HFST). $ 1,809,000 $ 1,809,000 BCR 26 H10-03-016 03-Placer County-01 3 Placer County SACOG High Friction Surface
Treatment for several areas
in rural Placer County
(Auburn and Lincoln).
Hungry Hollow Rd. at Hardscrabble Dr., Lonestar Rd. (1 local 1/4 mile e of Bell Rd. and one w of View Wy.), McCourtney Rd. at Fleming Dr., Mt. Vernon Rd. (2 areas), Placer Hills Rd. n of Pinewood Wy, Sierra College Bl n of 12 Bridges & Wise Rd.
Placer County, in order to reduce high-severity collisions along roadways, is applying for funding to perform high friction surface treatments along abrupt horizontal curves on several roadways primarily in the areas of Auburn and Lincoln.
$ 1,201,600 $ 1,201,600 BCR
27 H10-03-017 03-Placer County-02 3 Placer County SACOG Placer County Signal Upgrade Project Various locations in Placer County
Upgrade all signal backplates with new reflective backplates, replace old pedestrian heads with countdown type heads and replace old controllers along Douglas Blvd. with new 2070 controllers.
$ 351,300 $ 351,300 BCR
28 H10-03-018 03-Placer County-4 3 Placer County SACOG Placer County Guardrail Retrofit Indian Hill Road, Ridge Road, and Rollins Lake Road. Update guardrail to bring existing facilities up to current standards. $ 1,070,500 $ 995,500 SA-Guardrail 29 H10-03-019 03-Placerville-1 3 Placerville SACOG
Placerville Highway 50
Corridor Intersection
Pedestrian Safety Project
US Highway 50, PM 16.7 to PM 18.8 (within the City limits of Placerville).
Enhance pedestrian crossing safety through the use of dynamic warning signs at various state highway and local road at grade pedestrian/school crossings.
$ 250,000 $ 250,000 SAPedCrossing
30 H10-03-020 03-Rancho Cordova-2 3 Rancho Cordova SACOG Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project
On Peter A Mccuen Boulevard adjacent to VA Northern Medical Center and four intersections along Zinfandel Dr and Cordova Lane adjacent to Cordova Lane Center School.
Improve pedestrian crossings with curb extensions, accessible curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, and advanced pavement markings.
$ 242,400 $ 242,400 SAPedCrossing
31 H10-03-021 03-Sacramento-1 3 Sacramento SACOG
City of Sacramento
Pedestrian Crossing
Improvements
Various locations throughout the City of Sacramento Upgrade pedestrian crossings at uncontrolled locations with the installation of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs). $ 248,600 $ 248,600 SAPedCrossing 32 H10-03-022 03-Sacramento County-1 3 Sacramento
County SACOG
Converting a STOP-sign
Controlled Intersection to a
Signalized Intersection in
Sacramento County
The Intersection of Fair Oaks Boulevard and Kenneth Avenue. Signalization of intersection to mitigate collisions and improve safety. $ 815,800 $ 815,800 BCR
33 H10-03-023 03-Sacramento County-5 3 Sacramento
County SACOG Upgrading Guardrails in Sacramento County 17 locations within Sacramento County. Upgrade existing guardrails and their end treatments. $ 999,900 $ 999,900 SA-Guardrail 34 H10-03-024 03-Sierra County-01 3 Sierra County RURAL Phase 1-Countywide
Guardrail Upgrade or
Replacement
On Pike City Road at 3 locations, on Brandy City Road at 9 locations, and on Upper Main Street at 3 locations. Replace damaged guardrail with steel posts. $ 539,500 $ 539,500 SA-Guardrail 35 H10-03-025 03-Woodland-1 3 Woodland SACOG East St./Main St. Signal Improvements Intersection of East Street and Main Street in the City of Woodland. Intersection signal improvements. $ 336,900 $ 158,450 BCR 36 H10-03-026 03-Woodland-2 3 Woodland SACOG Pedestrian Crossings Improvements Project
Pedestrian Crossings at Dingle, Maxwell, Zamora and Gibson Elementary Schools in Woodland.
Installation of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) and AC Powered Speed Feedback Signs. $ 250,000 $ 250,000 SAPedCrossing 37 H10-03-027 03-Yuba City-1 3 Yuba City SACOG Citywide Signal Hardware Upgrades Various signalized intersections throughout the City of Yuba City.
Improve signal hardware at 38 signalized intersections.
Improvements include new backplates, replacing 8" bulbs with 12", adding/replacing LED IISNS, and installing reflective tape. $ 571,000 $ 548,160 BCR
38 H10-03-028 03-Yuba City-2 3 Yuba City SACOG Yuba City Arterial/Collector Sign Upgrades
Various arterial and collector roadways throughout the City of Yuba City.
Installation and/or upgrade signs with new fluorescent sheeting, as well as the completion of a Roadway Safety Signing Audit. $ 1,835,400 $ 1,835,400 BCR 2 of 16 February 10, 2021
Project List for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 10 (Sort by Caltrans District and Agency Name)
* Application Category: BCR = Benefit-Cost Ratio; SA-PedCrossing = Set-aside for Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements; SA-Guardrail = Set-aside for Guardrail Upgrade; SA-Edgeline = Set-aside for Installing Edgelines.
No. Unique
Project ID Original Application ID Caltrans District Agency Name MPO Project Title Location of Work Description of Work Project Cost HSIP Funds (State) Application Category* 39 H10-03-029 03-Yuba City-3 3 Yuba City SACOG
Yuba City Crosswalk
Upgrades for Pedestrian
Safety
Various unsignalized intersections in Yuba City.
Crosswalk improvements at 15 unsignalized intersections, primarily near schools. Improvements include replacing standard crosswalks with high visibility striping, advance stop bars, yield lines, and ADA improvements.
$ 199,100 $ 199,100 SAPedCrossing
40 H10-03-030 03-Yuba City-4 3 Yuba City SACOG
Hardware Improvement
Project for State Highway
Signalized Intersections
within City of Yuba City
Various State Highway Signalized intersections within City of Yuba City limits.
Improve Signal Hardware at 17 State Highway Signalized
Intersections. Improvements include new back plates, replacing 8" bulbs and lenses with 12", adding/replacing TYPE IX Street Name Signs, and installing reflective tape.
$ 510,600 $ 510,600 BCR
41 H10-03-031 03-Yuba County-1 3 Yuba County SACOG
North Beale Road - High
Friction Surface Treatment
Project
North Beale Road, starting at a point 300 feet SE of the intersection with Feather River Blvd. and extending 3,000 feet NW to the SR70 on-ramp.
Improve pavement friction by installing High Friction Surface Treatment, plus installing edge lines, centerlines, delineators, reflectors, and object markers.
$ 381,400 $ 381,400 BCR
42 H10-03-032 03-Yuba County-2 3 Yuba County SACOG Old Dobbins Road & La Porte Road Striping Project
The entirety of Old Dobbins Road and on La Porte Road from Barton Hill Road to the Plumas County line.
Install edge lines, centerlines, delineators, reflectors, object markers, and improved reflective signs. $ 274,100 $ 274,100 BCR 43 H10-04-001 04-Alameda-1 4 Alameda MTC
Signal Equipment, Timing, &
Striping Upgrades at 4
Intersections to Improve
Pedestrian Safety
four intersections: Santa Clara Avenue/Grand Street, Otis Drive/Willow Street, Otis Drive/Park Street, and Fernside Blvd./San Jose Avenue.
Provide upgraded traffic signal equipment, timing and striping to improve pedestrian safety. Upgraded equipment includes
cabinets, controllers, video detection, audible pedestrian signals and signal heads.
$ 273,100 $ 249,076 SAPedCrossing
44 H10-04-002 04-Alameda County-1 4 Alameda County MTC
Pedestrian Crossing
Enhancements for
Unincorporated Alameda
County
Various unsignalized intersections in the unincorporated Alameda County: Meekland Ave. at Medford Ave., Meekland Ave. at Sunset Blvd., Hacienda Ave. at Ricardo Ave., Grove Way at Dolores St., and D St. at Twin Creek CT.
Install Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs) and various crosswalk enhancements to unsignalized intersections to increase safety for pedestrians.
$ 249,500 $ 249,500 SAPedCrossing
45 H10-04-003 04-Alameda County-2 4 Alameda County MTC Guardrail improvements along Crow Canyon Road
Various locations along Crow Canyon Road in unincorporated Alameda County.
Upgrade existing guardrails at locations with damage and height below accepted tolerance. $ 994,600 $ 994,600 SA-Guardrail 46 H10-04-004 04-Alameda County-3 4 Alameda County MTC
Installation of PHBs at threelegged intersections on roads with two or more lanes in
each direction
Three unsignalized intersections with existing marked crosswalks in suburban areas of Alameda County: Redwood Road and Modesto Street, Lake Chabot Road and Congress Way, and Lake Chabot Road and Keith Avenue.
Installation of Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons and raised medians; installation of accompanying signage, ADA Ramps, and
pavement striping.
$ 821,000 $ 821,000 BCR
47 H10-04-005 04-Benicia-2 4 Benicia MTC Pedestrian Crossing Improvements at 4 locations
Kearney Street at Rose Drive, Kearney Street at Mid-Block Crossing, Hastings Drive at Southhampton Road and Military West at W 3rd Street.
Install high-visibility crosswalks, advance yield limit lines, signage, RRFB systems, ADA compliant ramps, and bulb-outs. $ 249,900 $ 249,900 SAPedCrossing 48 H10-04-006 04-Berkeley-B1 4 Berkeley MTC
Sacramento Street
Pedestrian Crossing Safety
Enhancements
Six intersections along Sacramento Street: Oregon Street, Julia Street, Tyler Street, Prince Street, Woolsey Street and Fairview Street.
Install RRFBs, warning signing, and raised median extensions at three intersections. Install advanced yield lines and warning signing at three other intersections.
$ 339,800 $ 250,000 SAPedCrossing
49 H10-04-007 04-Concord-1 4 Concord MTC Traffic Signal Improvements Various locations throughout the City of Concord.
Improve traffic signal hardware, install pedestrian countdown signal heads, and modify phasing to provide a Lead Pedestrian Interval (LPI).
$ 2,360,000 $ 2,171,200 BCR
50 H10-04-008 04-Concord-2 4 Concord MTC Citywide Protected Left-Turn Implementation Various intersections throughout the City. Modify 9 intersections with permissive left-turn phasing to provide protected left-turn phasing. $ 1,254,800 $ 1,254,800 BCR 51 H10-04-009 04-Concord-4 4 Concord MTC
Pedestrian Crossing
Enhancements at 4 locations
in Concord, Ca
Concord Boulevard at West Street, Salvio Street at Date Street, Ronald Way at Holbrook Elementary School Entrance and E.
Olivera Road at Trail Crossing.
Install high-visibility crosswalks, concrete bulb-outs, advance warning signs, and ADA ramps. $ 246,600 $ 246,600 SAPedCrossing 52 H10-04-010 04-Contra Costa County-1 4 Contra Costa
County MTC Briones Area Guardrail Upgrades
Various locations on arterial and major collector roadways in the Briones area of unincorporated Contra Costa County.
Replace sub-standard MBGR guardrails with Caltrans standard MGS guardrails and end treatments on arterial and major collector roadways. Upgrade includes approximately 43
guardrails with a length of over 12,000 linear feet.
$ 1,687,800 $ 992,082 SA-Guardrail
53 H10-04-011 04-Contra Costa County-2 4 Contra Costa
County MTC Franklin Canyon Road Safety
Improvements
On Franklin Canyon Road in unincorporated Contra Costa County between Cummings Skyway and Dutra Road. Install centerline rumble strips. $ 562,400 $ 562,400 BCR 54 H10-04-012 04-Contra Costa County-4 4 Contra Costa
County MTC
San Pablo Dam Rd and
Bailey Rd Signal Hardware
Upgrades
San Pablo Dam Rd from El Portal Dr to Castro Ranch Rd; Bailey Rd from Willow Pass Rd to Canal Rd/ Via Delta De Anza Trail.
Improve safety by improving traffic signal hardware, with enlarged signal heads, video detection, advance dilemma zone detection, and install pedestrian countdown signal heads at 11 signalized intersections.
$ 1,100,100 $ 1,100,100 BCR
3 of 16 February 10, 2021
List of Funded Projects for Developing Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) (Sorted by Caltrans District) January 31, 2020
LRSP ID Caltrans
District Local Agency County Total Cost LRSP Funds Local/Other Funds Scope of Work Notes LRSP015 3 Folsom Sacramento County $ 80,000 $ 72,000 $ 8,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP).
LRSP016 3 Glenn County Glenn County $ 60,000 $ 54,000 $ 6,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP).
LRSP093 3 Grass Valley Nevada County $ 80,000 $ 72,000 $ 8,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan
(LRSP).
LRSP017 3 Isleton Sacramento County $ 80,000 $ 72,000 $ 8,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP).
LRSP094 3 Rancho Cordova Sacramento County $ 80,000 $ 72,000 $ 8,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan
(LRSP).
LRSP095 3 Rocklin Placer County $ 80,000 $ 72,000 $ 8,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan
(LRSP).
LRSP018 3 Roseville Placer County $ 80,000 $ 72,000 $ 8,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP).
LRSP096 3 Sacramento County Sacramento County $ 80,000 $ 72,000 $ 8,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan
(LRSP).
LRSP019 3 Truckee Nevada County $ 80,000 $ 72,000 $ 8,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP).
LRSP097 3 Yuba City Sutter County $ 80,000 $ 72,000 $ 8,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan
(LRSP).
LRSP098 3 Yuba County Yuba County $ 80,000 $ 72,000 $ 8,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan
(LRSP).
LRSP099 4 Antioch Contra Costa County $ 72,000 $ 64,800 $ 7,200 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan
(LRSP).
LRSP020 4 Concord Contra Costa County $ 80,000 $ 72,000 $ 8,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP).
LRSP100 4 Cotati Sonoma County $ 80,000 $ 72,000 $ 8,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan
(LRSP).
LRSP101 4 Cupertino Santa Clara County $ 81,000 $ 72,000 $ 9,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan
(LRSP).
LRSP021 4 Dublin Alameda County $ 80,000 $ 72,000 $ 8,000 Develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP).
Agenda Item 7
CITY OF YUBA CITY
STAFF REPORT
Date: February 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Public Works Department
Presentation By: Ben Moody, Public Works & Development Services Director Summary
Subject: Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Round 1 Grant Projects - Contract Amendment
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution to award Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with West Yost and Associates, Inc. to initiate additional data collection activities for updating the modeling of Gilsizer Slough for the Prop 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Projects
Fiscal Impact: The total cost for Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with West Yost is $10,150.00. Staff recommends funding this increase from Capital Improvement Program Account No. 921025 (Drainage Improvements). The current balance in this account is approximately $614,000 Purpose:
To minimize adverse water quality impacts from point sources to surface and groundwater and to improve and protect riparian and fish habitat, and fish passage by the removal of trash debris.
Council’s Strategic Goals:
The projects address the City Council’s Strategic Goal of Improving Infrastructure.
Background:
The City of Yuba City is a stakeholder in the North Sacramento Valley (NSV) Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) region, which includes Butte, Colusa, Glenn, Shasta, Sutter, and Tehama Counties.
In 2019, Butte County was the lead agency for the NSV IRWM Proposition 1 Round 1 grant funding application. Butte County examined various stakeholder’s projects that have been identified in approved Storm Water Resource Plans (SWRP). Two of the City’s SWRP projects were selected to be included in Butte County’s NSV IRWM Proposition 1 Round 1 grant application: Project 4 Gilsizer North Detention Basin Improvement Project (Project 4) and Project 5 Lincoln Road Trash Capture Project in Gilsizer Slough at Lincoln Road (Project 5). The City’s projects were awarded funding by DWR in the amount of $970,700 on July 3, 2020.
Project 4 involves improvements to the detention basin east of the City’s Corporation Yard, constructing
a cover for the existing fuel station at the Corporation Yard, and installation of retractable tarps for bulk material storage areas at the Corp Yard. Project 5 involves installing a full capture trash capture device to a newly constructed concrete pad at the bottom of Gilsizer Slough downstream of Lincoln Rd. Refer to Attachment 2 for a location map showing these two projects.
On July 20, 2021, Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a Subrecipient Agreement with Butte County allowing allocation of the grant funds for these projects. Then on April 5, 2022, Council authorized the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with West Yost and Associates, Inc. (West Yost) to facilitate environmental documents, permitting, and design of the projects.
Analysis:
During a kickoff site visit with County of Sutter staff, the design team learned that the County has been maintaining stream gauges in the Gilsizer Slough that have collected stream flow data from the largest storms in the past two years. This data would be particularly useful for calibrating the Regional Drainage Model by using real time stream gauge data from real storms instead of computer-generated modeled storms. This calibration would result in the most cost-efficient design for the two projects.
West Yost has prepared an estimate to collect and analyze the real-time stream gauge data and update the City’s Regional Drainage Model accordingly. The total cost for this additional work would be $10,150. Staff recommends authorizing this additional work since West Yost is uniquely familiar with the City’s Regional Drainage Model and can incorporate the new data as cost effectively as possible.
Fiscal Impact:
The total cost for Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with West Yost is $10,150.00. Staff recommends funding this increase from Capital Improvement Program Account No. 1025 (Drainage Improvements). The current balance in this account is approximately $614,000.
Alternatives:
Do not adopt the Resolution and direct staff to use the current Regional Drainage Model, resulting in a less efficient design of the trash capture devices.
Recommendation:
Adopt a Resolution to award Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with West Yost and Associates, Inc. to initiate additional data collection activities for updating the modeling of Gilsizer Slough for the Prop 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Projects.
Attachments:
1. Resolution - Prop 1 IRWM Projects - Amendment 1
Prepared By: Submitted By:
William Jow
Assistant Engineer
Diana Langley
City Manager
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. ________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUBA CITY APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WEST YOST & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO INITIATE ADDITIONAL DATA COLLECTION
ACTIVITIES FOR UPDATING THE MODELING OF GILSIZER SLOUGH FOR THE PROPOSITION 1 ROUND 1 INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT
PROJECTS
WHEREAS, on April 5, 2022, the City Council awarded a Professional Services Agreement to West Yost and Associates, Inc (West Yost), to provide professional services necessary for the Proposition 1 Round 1 Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) projects (Projects); and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Professional Services Agreement with West Yost for the first time to include additional data collection and analysis for calibration of the Gilsizer Slough portion of the Regional Drainage Model; and WHEREAS, it has been determined by the City Council that such modeling of stormwater drainage infrastructure and amendment of the Professional Services Agreement is in the public interest.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Yuba City resolves as follows:
1. The City Council of the City of Yuba City authorizes the City Manager to enter into Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with West Yost to include activities for the calibration of the Gilsizer Slough portion of the Regional Drainage Model for the Projects. The City Council finds that approval of such amendment in the best interest of the City.
The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Yuba City at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7 th day of
February 2023.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Wade Kirchner, Mayor
Ciara Wakefield, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
COUNSEL FOR YUBA CITY
Shannon L. Chaffin, City Attorney
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
Attachment(s):
Exhibit A – Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Service Agreement
EXHIBIT A
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WEST YOST AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
West Yost and Associates, Inc.
2020 Research Park Dr
Davis, CA 95618
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 1 to Scope of Services for Yuba City’s Prop 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Trash Capture Projects
This Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services dated April 5, 2022 (“First Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the ___ day of ________, 2023 by and between the City of Yuba City (“City”) and West Yost and Associates, Inc. (“Consultant”).
Recitals
Whereas, by Professional Services Agreement dated April 5, 2022 (“Prime Agreement”), City entered into an agreement with Consultant for professional engineering services for the City’s Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management’s Trash Capture Projects in the amount of $180,093.00.
Whereas, the Parties desire to amend the Prime Agreement for the first time to include additional data collection and analysis for calibration of the Gilsizer Slough portion of the City’s Regional Drainage Model under optional Task Seven related to the Project.
Agreement
In consideration of the foregoing Recitals and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the City and Consultant agree as set forth herein.
1. Section 1, Scope of Services, of the Prime Agreement is replaced with the following:
See Attached Scope of Services
(Exhibit A)
2. Section 3, Compensation, of the Prime Agreement is amended to add the following:
For services rendered by Consultant under this Amendment No. 1 to the Prime Agreement as outlined above, Consultants Compensation shall not exceed $190,243.
3. A copy of the Prime Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and, except as otherwise amended by this First Amendment, is incorporated as though set forth in full herein.
4. Except as amended in this First Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Prime Agreement and First Amendment shall remain the same and shall be in full force and effect. This First Amendment is not effective until approved and executed by the authorized City representative.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first written above.
CITY:
CITY OF YUBA CITY, a municipal corporation
Diana Langley, City Manager
CONSULTANT:
WEST YOST AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Name:______________________________
Title:________________________________
Kindly execute the original and two (2) copies and return to City Hall at 1201 Civic Center Boulevard, Yuba City, CA 95993; the City will return a fully-executed copy to you via mail for your files.
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Amended Exhibit A to Prime Agreement
Exhibit B: Prime Agreement
Exhibit A
2020 Research Park Drive
Suite 100
Davis CA 95618
530.756.5905 phone
530.756.5991 fax
westyost.com
March 16, 2022 SENT VIA: EMAIL
Mr. William Jow
Assistant Engineer
City of Yuba City
Public Works Department
1201 Civic Center Blvd.
Yuba City, CA 95993
SUBJECT: Proposal for Engineering Services for Design of the Gilsizer North Detention Basin Improvements and the Gilsizer Slough at Lincoln Road Improvements Dear William:
West Yost is pleased to provide the City of Yuba City (City) with this proposal to prepare plans, technical specifications, and cost estimates and to provide permitting services for the Design of the Gilsizer North Detention Basin Improvements and the Gilsizer Slough at Lincoln Road Improvements (Projects). West Yost is uniquely qualified to efficiently design these projects because we prepared predesign level Technical Memoranda (TMs) on each project on June 28, 2018, and because we developed the Gilsizer Slough drainage model, which will be used to verify design level water surface elevations and flow rates. This proposal covers design services based on the predesign TMs. The proposed scope of services, budget, and schedule are described below. Two days of surveying will be performed by Slooten Surveying as a subconsultant to West Yost. All geotechnical engineering work will be performed by Geocon Consultants, Inc.(GCI) as a subconsultant to West Yost (see Attachment A). All structural design work will be performed by VE Solutions (Bradley A.
Freiderichs, SE) as a subconsultant to West Yost (see Attachment B). The Environmental Permitting will be performed by Dokken Engineering as a subconsultant to West Yost (see Attachment C).
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of services is described below by work task.
Task 1. Project Management and Meetings
We will manage the project and project staff to ensure the project remains on budget and on schedule.
We will conduct a kickoff meeting with City staff (and County staff if they choose to participate in the design effort). The kickoff meeting will be conducted in-person and will include a site visit to each project site and improvement location. We will also discuss options for bidding and constructing the projects. We will prepare a summary of the kickoff meeting for review and approval by the City.
We will also conduct: 1) a 50% design review meeting via Microsoft Teams; 2) an on-site 90% design review meeting; and 3) a 100% design review meeting via Microsoft Teams. The purpose of the design review meetings is to obtain City (and County) comment on the design submittals.
Mr. William Jow
March 16, 2022
Task 1 Deliverables
• Meeting agenda and notes
Task 2. Data Collection (Design Level Surveys and Geotechnical Evaluations)
All surveying will be performed by Slooten Surveying as a subconsultant to West Yost. Slooten Surveying will perform design level surveying of the Corp Yard fueling area, the North Gilsizer Detention Basin and Pump Station, and the Gilsizer Slough at Lincoln Road to 200 feet south of Lincoln Road.
All geotechnical engineering work will be performed by GCI. GCI will perform the geotechnical investigation at the Corp Yard fuel area for design of the fuel area roof. The geotechnical evaluation will include:
• Performing up to two borings at the Corp Yard fuel area • Performing Laboratory testing to prepare design parameters • Preparing a geotechnical engineering report
Task 2 Deliverables
• Topographic Survey in AutoCAD format
• Geotechnical Report
Task 3. Design of Trash Capture Facilities and Gilsizer North Detention Basin Improvements
This task includes design of the following items:
• Trash capture screen in Gilsizer Slough just south of Lincoln Road. • Trash capture screen at the inlet to the North Gilsizer Detention Basin Pump Station. • Bioswales from each storm drain outlet to the North Gilsizer Detention Basin trash capture screen. Culverts will be included in the bioswales to ensure vehicle access to all areas of the basin.
• Filling of the existing low flow channels in the bottom of the existing North Gilsizer Detention Basin.
• If authorized, grading the bottom of the basin to increase the storage volume to mitigate for future development in the tributary watershed (see optional subtask below).
The predesign TM also shows a baseball diamond and a pedestrian access gate from the existing nearby baseball fields in the project, but these two improvements are not included in this design task.
The design will include the following sheets:
• G1 – Title Sheet and Location Maps
• G2 – Abbreviations, Notes, and legend
• G3 – Overall Plan, Key Map, and Survey Control
Mr. William Jow
March 16, 2022
• C1 – Gilsizer North Detention Basin Grading Plan (at 1 inch = 40 feet) • C2 – Gilsizer North Detention Basin Bioswale Details and Sections (including seed mix) • C3 – Gilsizer North Detention Basin Trash Screen Details and Sections • C4 – Gilsizer Slough South of Lincoln Road Trash Screen Details and Sections • S1 – Trash Screen Structural Design
• S2 – Trash Screen Structural Notes
The 65% design submittal will include Sheets G1 through C4. The 90%, 100%, and Final (for bid and construction) submittals will include all the design sheets (including Sheets S1 and S2).
We will prepare and submit draft technical specifications with the 90% design and final technical specifications with the 100% design. The following technical specifications are anticipated. • 01010 Summary of Work
• 01140 Work Sequence and Constraints
• 01200 Measurement and Payment
• 01322 Construction Schedule
• 01325 Field Engineering
• 01330 Contractor Submittals
• 01450 Quality Control
• 01505 Mobilization
• 01500 Construction Facilities
and Utilities
• 01560 Environmental Controls
• 01570 Storm Water Quality Control
• 01770 Project Closeout
• 01780 Record Drawings
• 01910 Hazardous Material Procedures
• 02017 Geotextile Fabrics
• 02081 Controlled Low Strength Material
• 02221 Demolition, Salvage,
and Abandonment
• 02241 Control of Water
• 02200 Site Preparation
• 02260 Excavation Support and Protection
• 02300 Earthwork
• 02950 Site Restoration
• 02385 Rock Slope Protection
• 02925 Hydroseeding
• 03301 Cast-in-Place Concrete (for
small projects)
• 05100 Structural Metals
• 02635 Reinforced Concrete Pipe
• 05501 Anchor Bolts
An Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) will be prepared and submitted with the 50% and 90% submittals
Task 3 Deliverables
• Concept Drawings
• 50% Drawings and OPCC
• 90% Drawings, Technical Specifications, and OPCC
• 100% Drawings and Technical Specifications
• Final Submittal Including Signed Drawings and Signed Technical Specifications Task 3 Assumptions
• All submittals will be in electronic PDF format
Mr. William Jow
March 16, 2022
Task 4 Design of Corp Yard Improvements
This task includes design of the following items:
• Retractable tarps for material storage areas
• Permanent roof over Corp Yard fuel station and drainage and water quality requirements consistent with the Fueling Area design guidelines in the Sacramento Region Stormwater Quality Design Manual (to the extent possible given the existing site constraints) The design will include the following sheets:
• G1 – Title Sheet and Location Maps
• G2 – Abbreviations, Notes, and legend
• G3 - Overall Plan, Key Map, and Survey Control
• C1 – Retractable Tarps and Associated Details
• C2 – Fueling Area Site Plan and Grading
• C3 – Fueling Area Details and Sections
• S1 – Fueling Area Roof Structural Design
• S2 – Fueling Area Structural Notes
The 50% design submittal will include Sheets G1 through C3. The 90%, 100%, and Final (for bid and construction) submittals will include all the design sheets (including Sheets S1 and S2).
We will prepare and submit draft technical specifications with the 90% design and final technical specification with the 100% design. The following technical specifications are anticipated. • 01010 Summary of Work
• 01140 Work Sequence and Constraints
• 01200 Measurement and Payment
• 01322 Construction Schedule
• 01325 Field Engineering
• 01330 Contractor Submittals
• 01450 Quality Control
• 01505 Mobilization
• 01500 Construction Facilities
and Utilities
• 01560 Environmental Controls
• 01570 Storm Water Quality Control
• 01770 Project Closeout
• 01780 Record Drawings
• 01910 Hazardous Material Procedures
• 02017 Geotextile Fabrics
• 02221 Demolition, Salvage,
and Abandonment
• 02200 Site Preparation
• 02260 Excavation Support and Protection
• 02300 Earthwork
• 02950 Site Restoration
• 2953 Pavement Restoration
• 03301 Cast-in-Place Concrete (for
small projects)
• 05100 Structural Metals
• 05120 Structural Steel
• 05300 Steel Roof Deck
• 05501 Anchor Bolts
An OPCC will be prepared and submitted with the 50% and 90% submittals
Mr. William Jow
March 16, 2022
Task 4 Deliverables
• Concept Drawings
• 50% Submittal including C- Drawings and OPCC
• 90% Submittal Including all Drawings, Draft Technical Specifications and OPCC • 100% Submittal Including all Drawings and Final Technical Specifications • Final Submittal Including Signed Drawings and Signed Technical Specifications Task 4 Assumptions
• All submittals will be in electronic PDF format
Task 5. Environmental Permitting Support
The following permits are anticipated for the Lincoln Road Trash Capture Screen and potentially also for the Gilsizer North Detention Basin Improvements:
• Pre-Application Agency Coordination
• California Department of Fish and Wildlife Stream Bed Alternation Agreement • Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
As a subconsultant to West Yost, Dokken Engineering will provide initial coordination with the permitting agencies, prepare the permit applications, and provide follow-up coordination with the permitting agencies. If needed, the Clean Water Act Section 404 USA Army Corps of Engineers permit application has been included as an optional task (Task 7 below).
This proposal does not include a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) evaluation nor associated cultural or biological data base evaluations or site-specific field evaluation. The City is to provide copies of the needed CEQA evaluation and associated studies for use for the environmental permitting applications and support.
Task 5 Deliverables
• Permit Pre-Application Coordination Summary emails, CDFW Streambed Alteration Agreement Application, CWA Section 401 Certification Application.
Task 6. Project–Specific Full Capture System Certification Application (Updated April 2021) Support
We will review the previously approved trash screens and devices that could be used at each of the trash capture sites (see Certified Full Capture System List of Trash Treatment Control Devices). We will also review the requirements for use of a detention basin for trash capture (see Detention Basins Multi-Benefit Trash Treatment Systems). We will try to identify trash screen technologies that have already been approved by the State and are suitable for use at each trash screen site. If approved technologies are available, we will discuss their use with you and jointly determine if the approved technologies should be used in the Task 2 design drawings. If no suitable technology exists already, we will prepare a Project– Specific Full Capture System Certification Application, including the required information that can be developed with the drainage model and the design effort. However, there may be some data that West Yost won’t be able to generate, like the field/lab testing Information and analysis. Because it is
Mr. William Jow
March 16, 2022
currently unclear if approved technologies are available or how much effort will be needed to gain approval of site-specific designs, we have allocated up to 24 hours for this task. We will not expend more than 24 hours of effort without your prior approval.
Task 6 Deliverables
• Project–Specific Full Capture System Certification Application 50% Submittal including C- Drawings and OPCC
Task 6 Assumptions
• Application will be submitted if no Certified Full Capture System Trash Treatment Control Devices are suitable for the Project
• Some data required for the application will need to be provided by others.
Task 7. Optional Tasks
Grade the basin to provide adequate additional detention storage to mitigate for development of the currently undeveloped parcels within the tributary watershed If this optional subtask is authorized, we will run the drainage model for existing conditions and with full development of all the currently undeveloped parcels in the watershed tributary to the North Gilsizer Detention Basin for the 100-year storm. Using the model results, we will calculate the increase to the basin volume needed to mitigate for the development. We will document this evaluation (including a map of the parcels that are undeveloped now and assumed to develop in the future) in a concise TM. We will grade the basin to include the required increase in storage volume. The purpose for doing this grading is to eliminate one potential obstacle to future development (flood-related impacts from increased flows to the basin from development). Nevertheless, the development could result in other impacts that would still need to be mitigated (like increased flow in the tributary storm drains).
Although probably not needed, preparation of the Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit application is included as an optional task.
BUDGET AND SCHEDULE
The proposed budget is shown in Table 1 by task. West Yost will perform the scope of services described above on a time-and-expenses basis at the billing rates set forth in West Yost’s attached Billing Rate Schedule (Attachment D). Any additional services not included in this Scope of Work will be performed only after receiving a written amendment to the contract. The budget shown in Table 1 does not include the optional task. The budget for the optional task is $16,342. We will only perform the optional task work with written approval from the City.
The schedule is based on receiving a fully executed contract and notice to proceed by April 1, 2022.
Mr. William Jow
March 16, 2022
Table 1. Budget and Schedule Summary
Task Schedule Cost, dollars
Task 1. Project Management and Meetings On-going, meetings coordinated with design submittals
20,730
Task 2. Data Collection (Design Level Surveys
and Geotechnical Evaluations)
Surveying: April 30
Geotechnical Report: May 30
14,789
Task 3. Design of Trash Capture Facilities and
Gilsizer North Detention Basin
Improvements
Concepts: April 11
65%: May 30
90%: June 30
100%: July 22
Final Design: August 19
Draft Technical Specs: June 30
Final Technical Specs: July 22
Optional Task: April 30
62,863
Task 4. Design of Corp Yard Improvements Concepts: April 11 50%: May 30
90%: June 30
100%: July 22
Final Design: August 19
Draft Technical Specs: June 30
Final Technical Specs: July 22
35,787
Task 5. Environmental Permitting Support Draft Applications: June 30 23,621 Task 6. Project–Specific Full Capture System
Certification Application (Updated
April 2021) Support
Review Approved Systems: April 30
Certification Application: May 30
5,961
Total $163,751
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. We can revise this proposal to better match the City’s design requirements and budget limitations if needed.
Sincerely,
WEST YOST
Douglas T. Moore, PE
Engineering Manager
RCE #58122
Attachment(s): A. Geocon Consultants, Inc. Proposal
B. VE Solutions, Inc. Proposal
C. Dokken Engineering Proposal
D. West Yost 2022 Billing Rate Schedule
Geocon Consultants Inc. Proposal
Attachment A
Proposal No. LS-22-96
March 11, 2022
Doug Moore
Engineering Manager
WEST YOST
2020 Research Park Drive, Suite 100
Davis, CA 95618
[email protected]
Subject: PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
FUELING ISLAND CANOPY IMPORVEMENTS
YUBA CITY CORPORATION YARD
1185 MARKET STREET
YUBA CITY, CALIFORNIA
Mr. Moore:
In accordance with your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal to perform a geotechnical investigation for the proposed improvements for the fueling area at the City of Yuba City Corporation Yard located at 1185 Market Street in Yuba City, California.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
To aid in preparing this proposal we have discussed the project with you and reviewed project information you provided. The project includes constructing a canopy over the existing fueling islands at the City Corporation Yard. The canopy will likely be supported on cast-0in-drilled-hole (CIDH) concrete piers or conventional spread footings.
The purpose of our geotechnical investigation will be to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site and provide geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of the proposed project. Our investigation will include a field exploration program, geotechnical laboratory testing, engineering analysis, and report preparation.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Based on our understanding of the project, we propose the following scope of services:
• Perform a limited geologic literature review to aid in evaluating the geologic conditions present at the site.
• Review available design plans to select exploratory excavation locations. • Perform a site reconnaissance to review project limits and mark out exploratory excavation locations for subsequent utility clearance.
• Notify subscribing utility companies via Underground Service Alert (USA) a minimum of two business days (as required by law) prior to performing exploratory borings at the Site. • Drill up two exploratory borings within/near the proposed improvement area to a depth of approximately 15 feet using a truck-mounted drill rig equipped with hollow-stem augers.
Geocon Proposal No. LS-22-96 - 2 - March 11, 2022
• Obtain representative soil samples from the exploratory borings. • Log the borings in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. • Upon completion, backfill borings with the drill cuttings or neat cement grout. • Perform laboratory tests to evaluate pertinent geotechnical parameters. • Analyze the field and laboratory testing data and prepare a letter report with our conclusions and recommendations. Our report will include (but not be limited to) the following:
• Site plan showing locations of exploratory borings
• Description of site geology and logs of subsurface conditions • Geotechnical laboratory test results
• Summary of geotechnical constraints and mitigation alternatives (if required) • Foundation design recommendations and nparameters: recommended foundation type(s), allowable bearing capacity, recommended dimensions, estimated settlement • Code-based seismic design criteria (2019 California Building Code) An electronic (PDF) version of the draft geotechnical investigation report will be submitted. Upon receipt of review comments, we will incorporate comments and submit a final report in PDF format.
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS
Our scope of services and fees are based on:
• The client will coordinate site access and permission to enter. • The site is accessible to truck-mounted drilling equipment. • Site plans provided for our use will show the locations of all underground utility lines and structures. We will not be responsible for damage to any such lines or structures that are not shown accurately on the plans provided to us or properly marked by USA subscriber companies. • The scope of services detailed in this proposal does not include the evaluation or identification of environmental contamination.
PROPOSED FEE
We propose to perform the scope of services described herein for a lump sum fee of $7,500.
Our services will be provided in accordance with the enclosed 2022 Schedule of Fees/Terms and Conditions, which is incorporated into and made a part of this proposal. If unforeseen conditions are encountered, or if we experience delays or circumstances beyond our control, we will notify you immediately to discuss modifications to the scope of services and/or project fees.
CONTRACT EXECUTION
If this proposal is acceptable, please issue a Professional Services Agreement for our review. We will commence with the scope of services outlined herein upon receipt of your written authorization; however, services provided by Geocon will be pursuant to the terms stated in our 2022 Schedule of Fees until or unless a mutually agreed upon, negotiated contract is finalized.
Geocon Proposal No. LS-22-96 - 3 - March 11, 2022
We appreciate the opportunity to provide a proposal for geotechnical services on this project. Please contact us if you have any questions concerning the contents of this proposal or if we may be of further service.
Respectfully submitted,
GEOCON CONSULTANTS, INC.
Jeremy J. Zorne, PE, GE
Senior Engineer
Attachment: 2022 Schedule of Fees
3160 Gold Valley Drive, Suite 800 ■ Rancho Cordova, California 95742 ■ Tel (916) 852-9118
2022 SCHEDULE OF FEES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Engineering Assistant/Laboratory Technician.......................................................................................................................................... $85/hr.
Engineering Field Technician/Special Inspector I ................................................................................................................ 85/125(PW)*/hr.
Engineering Field Technician/Special Inspector II ............................................................................................................... 95/135(PW)*/hr.
Engineering Field Technician/Special Inspector III/Equipment Operator ........................................................................... 105/145(PW)*/hr.
Word Processor/Technical Editor/Draftsman .......................................................................................................................................... 85/hr.
Research Assistant/Technical Illustrator/Senior Draftsman................................................................................................................... 100/hr.
Project Coordinator/GIS Specialist ........................................................................................................................................................... 110/hr.
Staff Engineer/Geologist/Scientist/Field Supervisor .............................................................................................................................. 125/hr.
Senior Staff Engineer/Geologist/Scientist ............................................................................................................................................... 135/hr.
Project Engineer/Geologist/Scientist/Construction Supervisor.............................................................................................................. 145/hr.
Senior Project Engineer/Geologist/Scientist............................................................................................................................................ 160/hr.
Senior Engineer/Geologist/Scientist/Certified Industrial Hygienist........................................................................................................ 175/hr.
Associate Engineer/Geologist/Scientist................................................................................................................................................... 200/hr.
Principal Engineer/Geologist/Scientist/Litigation Support ..................................................................................................................... 240/hr.
Deposition or Court Appearance............................................................................................................................................................... 400/hr.
Attorney Fees (General) ............................................................................................................................................................................ 350/hr.
Overtime (>8 to 12 hrs.), Saturday, and Night Rate ............................................................................................... 1.5X Regular Hourly Rate Overtime (>12 hrs.), Sunday, and Holiday Rate.......................................................................................................... 2X Regular Hourly Rate Minimum Professional Fee........................................................................................................................................................... $500/Project Minimum Field Services Fee (per day or call-out)................................................................................................................................... 4 Hours *Prevailing Wage (PW) per requirements of California Labor Code §720, et. Seq.
TRAVEL
Personnel ............................................................................................................................................................................ Regular Hourly Rate Subsistence (Per Diem)........................................................................................................................................................................ $200/day Vehicle Mileage .................................................................................................................................................................................... 0.75/mile
EQUIPMENT & ANALYTICAL TESTS
Nuclear Gauge ......................... Included in Technician Hourly Rate Level D PPE/Decon Rinse Equipment ............................ $50/day Pick-up Truck ................................................................... $125/day pH/Conductivity/Temperature Meter ............................. 60/day Equipment Truck .............................................................. 200/day 55-gallon drum ................................................................ 65/ea.
Direct-Push Rig/Operator ............................... 185/225(PW)*/hr. TPHg (EPA 8015M) .......................................................... 90/ea.
Direct-Push Sample Liner ................................................ 10/ea. TPHd/mo (EPA 8015M) ................................................... 80/ea.
Equipment Trailer ............................................................. 100/day Fuel Oxygenate Compounds (EPA 8260B) ..................... 110/ea.
Wenner 4-Pin Earth Resistivity Meter .............................. 150/day Volatile Organic Compounds (EPA 8260B) ..................... 150/ea.
Coring Machine (concrete, asphalt, masonry)................. 200/day Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (EPA 8270) ............. 300/ea.
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer ........................................... 250/day CAM 17 Metals (EPA 6010B) .......................................... 170/ea.
Dilatometer (DMT) Test Equipment ................................. 800/day Single Metal (EPA 6010B) ............................................... 30/ea.
Generator or Air Compressor............................................ 150/day STLC or TCLP Extraction .................................................. 75/ea.
GPS Unit ............................................................................ 160/day Soil pH (EPA 9045C) ........................................................ 25/ea.
Drive-Tube Sampler or Hand-Auger ................................. 50/day Organochlorine Pesticides (EPA 8081) ........................... 125/ea.
Soil Sample Tube (Brass or Stainless) ............................ 10/ea. Naturally Occurring Asbestos (CARB 435) ...................... 90/ea.
Water Level Indicator ....................................................... 40/day Asbestos PLM ................................................................... 20/ea.
Battery-Powered Pump .................................................... 75/day Asbestos 1,000-pt Count ................................................. 80/ea.
Photo-Ionization Meter .................................................... 150/day 48-hr/24-hr Turnaround Time .................... 60%/100% surcharge
LABORATORY TESTS
COMPACTION CURVES SOIL AND AGGREGATE STABILITY
4-inch mold (D1557/D698)............................................. $225/ea. Resistance Value, R-Value (D2844/CAL301)................. $300/ea. 6-inch mold (D1557/D698)............................................. 225/ea. R-Value, Treated (CAL301) .............................................. 325/ea.
California Impact (CAL216).............................................. 225/ea. California Bearing Ratio (D1883).................................... 175/pt.
Check Point....................................................................... 100/ea. Stabilization Ability of Lime (C977) ................................. 180/ea.
3160 Gold Valley Drive, Suite 800 ■ Rancho Cordova, California 95742 ■ Tel (916) 852-9118
SOIL AND AGGREGATE PROPERTIES
#200 Wash (D1140/C117) ............................................. $90/ea. Moisture Determination, tube sample (D2216)............. $20/ea.
Wet Sieve Analysis to #200 (D422/CAL202).................. 120/ea. Moisture Determination and Unit Weight (D2937) ........ 40/ea.
Dry Sieve Analysis, 1.5”+ Aggregate (D6913)................. 350/ea. Atterberg Limits: Plasticity Index (D4318) ...................... 200/ea.
Hydrometer Analysis (D422)............................................ 165/ea. Sand Equivalent (D2419/CAL217) ................................. 100/ea.
Sieve Analysis with Hydrometer (D422) .......................... 200/ea. pH and Resistivity (CAL643) ............................................ 120/ea.
Specific Gravity, Soil (T100)............................................. 100/ea. Sulfate Content (CAL417)................................................ 90/ea.
Specific Gravity Coarse Aggregate (C127)....................... 60/ea. Chloride Content (CAL422).............................................. 50/ea.
Specific Gravity Fine Aggregate (C128)........................... 75/ea. Organic Content (D2974)................................................. 65/ea.
Cut/Extract Shelby Tube .................................................. 100/ea.
SHEAR STRENGTH
Unconfined Compression (D2166).................................. $100/ea. CONCRETE / MASONRY / REINFORCING STEEL Direct Shear (3 pts.)(D3080) ........................................... 325/ea. Compressive Strength, Cast Cylinders (C39).................. $30/ea.
Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Shear (D2850)........ 125/pt. Compressive Strength, Cores (C42)................................ 60/ea.
Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Staged (D2850) ...... 175/ea. Flexural Strength Beam (C78/C293) .............................. 80/ea.
Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Shear (D4767) ............ 300/pt. Splitting Tensile Test (C496)............................................ 80/ea.
Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Staged (D4767) .......... 375/ea. DSA Masonry Shear (DSA-207) ....................................... 75/ea.
Consolidated-Drained Triaxial Shear (EM1110) ............. 400/pt. Shotcrete Panel Coring and Comp. Strength (C1140) ... 80/ea.
Consolidated-Drained Triaxial Staged (EM1110)............ 500/ea. Rebar Tensile / Bend (up to #11/#11 and Larger) 200/250/ea.
CMU Compressive Strength (C140) ................................ 100/ea.
PERMEABILITY, CONSOLIDATION AND EXPANSION Compressive Strength, Grout (C1019/UBC 21-19)........ 30/ea.
Permeability, Flexible Wall (D5084) ................................ $300/ea. Compressive Strength, Mortar (C109/UBC 21-15,16) .. 30/ea.
Permeability, Rigid Wall (D5856)..................................... 300/ea. CMU Unit Wt., Dimen., Absorption (C140) ...................... 75/ea.
Consolidation (D2435)..................................................... 60/pt. Compressive Strength, Masonry Prism (C1314) ............ 250/ea.
Expansion Index (D4829/UBC 29-2)............................... 225/ea.
Swell/Collapse (D4546)................................................... 165/pt. HOT MIX ASPHALT HMA Air Voids, Gyratory (T269) ....................................... $525/ea.
AGGREGATE QUALITY Hamburg Wheel Tracker (T324)...................................... 1,000/ea.
Sieve Analysis to #200 (C136) ........................................ $120/ea. Theoretical Max. Specific Gravity (D2041/CAL309) ...... 175/ea.
L.A. Rattler Test (500 rev.) (C131)................................... 200/ea. Ignition/Sieve Analysis (C136/CAL202) ......................... 220/ea.
Durability Index (D3744/CAL229)................................... 165/ea. HMA Core Unit Weight (D1188/CAL308)........................ 100/ea.
Fine Aggregate Angularity (CAL 234) ............................... 125/ea. % Asphalt, Ignition Method (D6307/CAL382)................ 125/ea.
Flat and Elongated Particles (D4791/CAL 235) ............. 150/ea. % Asphalt, Ignition Calibration (D6307/CAL382)............. 400/ea.
Percent Crushed Particles (CAL205) ............................... 150/ea. Tensile Strength Ratio (T283)……………………………… .... 1,000/ea. *2X surcharge on rush turnaround for laboratory testing
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Listed are typical charges for the services most frequently performed by Geocon. Prices for unlisted services as well as special quotations for programs involving volume work will be provided upon request. Laboratory test prices shown are for laboratory work only, and include reporting of routine results not calling for comments, recommendations or conclusions.
2. Sampling and testing is conducted in substantial conformance with the latest applicable or designated specifications of the American Society for Testing and Materials, Caltrans, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or other pertinent agencies.
3. Saturday, night work, and overtime hours are charged at time and one-half; Sundays and holidays at double time. Per diem may apply when location of work dictates.
4. Equipment and materials will be billed at cost plus 15%. Outside services including subcontractors and rental of special equipment are billed at cost plus 15%. Hourly services are billed portal to portal from closest office in accordance with the stated hourly rates herein, with a minimum four-hour charge.
5. Invoices will be submitted at four-week intervals. Terms of payment are met upon presentation of invoice. Invoices become delinquent thirty (30) days from invoice date and subject to one and one-half percent (1-1/2%) service charge per month, or the maximum rate allowed by law, whichever is lower. If Client objects to all or any portion of any invoice, Client will so notify Geocon in writing within fourteen (14) calendar days of the invoice date, identify the cause of disagreement, and pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute. The parties will immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion of the invoice.
Payment on delinquent invoices will first be applied to accrued interest and then to the principal amount. All time spent and expenses incurred (including any attorney's fees and costs) in connection with collection of any delinquent amount will be paid by Client to Geocon per Geocon's current fee schedule.
6. Client and Geocon shall allocate certain of the risks so that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Geocon’s (the term “Geocon” includes Geocon’s partners, officers, directors, employees, agents, affiliates, subcontractors and subconsultants) total aggregate liability to Client is limited to the greater of $10,000 or the total compensation received from Client by Geocon for services rendered on this project, for any and all of Client’s injuries, damages, claims, losses, expenses, or claim expenses arising out of this Agreement from any cause or causes, including attorneys’ fees and costs which may be awarded to the prevailing party, and Client agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Geocon from and against all liabilities in excess of the monetary limit established above.
Client and Geocon shall allocate certain of the other risks so that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Client shall limit Geocon’s total aggregate liability to all third parties, including contractors, subcontractors of all tiers, materialmen, and others involved in Client’s project, as well as persons and other entities not involved in the project, to the greater of $20,000 or the total compensation received from Client by Geocon for services rendered on this project, for any and all injuries, damages, cause or causes, including attorneys’ fees and costs which may be awarded to the prevailing party, and Client agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Geocon from and against all liabilities in excess of the monetary limit established above, including all liability incurred by Geocon for acts, errors, or omissions, pursuant to entering into agreements with third parties on behalf of Client in order to obtain access or entry onto property not owned by Client. Client agrees to notify all contractors and subcontractors of any limitation of Geocon’s liability to them, and require them to abide by such limitation for damages suffered by any contractor or subcontractor arising from Geocon’s actions or inactions. Neither the contractor nor any subcontractor assumes any liability for damages to others which may arise on account of Geocon’s actions or inactions.
VE Solutions, Inc. Proposal
Note: VE Solutions agreed to a 10 percent budget reduction from the amounts shown in this budget. Also, engineering services during construction (ESD) are not included in this proposal.
Attachment B
Task Order Agreement
VE Solutions, Inc.
7777 Greenback Lane, Suite 104
Citrus Heights, CA 95610
[email protected]
(916) 505-0519
Client: West Yost & Associates
2020 Research Park Dr., Ste 100
Davis, CA 95618
Date: March 10, 2022
Project Name/Location: Gilsizer North Detention Basin Structures VES Project No.: 22021
Project Description: Structural engineering services for:
1. A 2 ft max high structural steel trash capture screen. The screen will be attached to an existing concrete slab and will be designed to resist full unbalanced water head on one side.
2. A max 20’ x 20’ x 20’ high structural steel canopy over an existing fuel station. The canopy will be supported on new concrete spread footings or drilled piers.
A geotechnical report will be prepared by others.
Scope of Services: Prepare structural engineering plans and calculations for the project described above. Review rfi's and submittals during construction. Documents will be signed and sealed by a California registered structural engineer.
Fee Arrangement: Design: $12,000; ESDC: $2,500; Total $14,500 Limitation of Liability: $1,000,000
Special Conditions: none
Offered by: Accepted by:
signature date signature date
Brad Friederichs, President S2780
name/title CA License name/title
VE Solutions, Inc.
Client
The Terms and Conditions of this agreement are in accordance with the Task Order Agreement dated September 27, 2017
3/10/2022
Task Order Agreement
VE Solutions, Inc.
7777 Greenback Lane, Suite 104
Citrus Heights, CA 95610
[email protected]
(916) 505-0519
Client: West Yost & Associates
2020 Research Park Dr., Ste 100
Davis, CA 95618
Date: March 10, 2022
Project Name/Location: Gilsizer Slough Trash Capture Device VES Project No.: 22022
Project Description: Structural engineering services for 5 ft high structural steel screen to span across an existing channel. The structure will resist full unbalanced water head on one side. It will be supported on a new concrete slab.
Scope of Services: Prepare structural engineering plans and calculations for the project described above. Review rfi's and submittals during construction. Documents will be signed and sealed by a California registered structural engineer.
Fee Arrangement: Design: $11,500; ESDC: $2,500; Total $14,000 Limitation of Liability: $1,000,000
Special Conditions: none
Offered by: Accepted by:
signature date signature date
Brad Friederichs, President S2780
name/title CA License name/title
VE Solutions, Inc.
Client
The Terms and Conditions of this agreement are in accordance with the Task Order Agreement dated September 27, 2017
3/10/2022
Dokken Engineering Proposal
Note: Dokken Engineering agreed to a 5 percent budget reduction from the amounts shown in this budget. Also, the Clean Water Act Section 404 Nation Wide Permit Task (OPTIONAL) and the associated budget are included in the optional task of this proposal.
Attachment C
110 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 200, Folsom, CA 95630 ▪ Tele: 916 858-0642 ▪ Fax: 916 858-0643 ▪ www.dokkenengineering.com March 11, 2022
Doug Moore
Engineering Manager
West Yost
2020 Research Park Drive, Suite 100
Davis, CA 95618
RE: Scope and Fee for Environmental Permitting Services for the Gilsizer Slough Trash Capture Project and the Gilsizer North Detention Basin Project in Yuba City Mr. Doug Moore,
Enclosed is a scope of services and fee for Dokken Engineering to obtain the necessary environmental permits for the planned Gilsizer Slough Trash Capture Project and the Gilsizer North Detention Basin Project in Yuba City. It is our understanding that Gilsizer Slough is a realigned natural channel with historic hydrologic connection to the Feather River and is therefore considered a Water of the U.S. and Water of the State. As such, environmental permits under the Clean Water Act and State of California Fish and Game Code must be obtained prior to the start of construction. Environmental Analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is being completed by the City and is not included in this scope of work.
The southwestern terminus of Gilsizer slough is known to support stable populations of special status species including giant garter snake (Thamnophis gigas) and tricolor blackbird (Agelaius tricolor). The proposed Gilsizer Slough Trash Capture Project at Lincoln Rd. does not provide habitat for these species and is located approximately 10 miles upstream of this habitat area and there is no suitable habitat for these species farther upstream in the watershed. It is therefore unlikely that these species will be impacted by either project and this scope of work assumes that the project will not result in “take” of any species listed as threatened or endangered by either the Federal Endangered Species Act or California Endangered Species Act.
Scope of Work
Task 1: Pre-Application Agency Coordination
Prior to beginning the permit application process, Dokken will present the proposed project features to our contacts at the regulatory agencies and receive initial feed back on the permitting effort that will be required for both projects. The agencies contacted will include the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This early coordination effort will ensure the permit applications contain only the project features that require environmental permits, streamlining the permitting process and potentially reducing permitting and mitigation costs.
Task 2: California Fish and Game Code §1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement Dokken will prepare the necessary components of a Notification of Streambed Alteration Package for submittal to CDFW via the department’s online permitting portal the Electronic Permitting Information and Management System (EPIMS). Dokken will work with City staff to set up an EPIMS account for the City and Dokken will take the lead on submitting the application through EPIMS. Dokken will review the draft permit prior to City signature to ensure permit conditions to not cause constructability issues.
110 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 200, Folsom, CA 95630 ▪ Tele: 916 858-0642 ▪ Fax: 916 858-0643 ▪ www.dokkenengineering.com Task 3: Clean Water Act §401 Water Quality Certification Dokken will prepare a Water Quality Certification application package for submittal to the RWQCB.
Dokken will follow up with RWQCB staff following submittal of the application package periodically to ensure timely review of application materials. Dokken will review the draft permit prior to City signature to ensure permit conditions to not cause constructability issues.
Task 4: Clean Water Act §404 Nationwide Permit Authorization (OPTIONAL) The proposed projects appear to be consistent with Nationwide Permit 25 – Structure Discharges. Use of this Nationwide Permit does not require submitting a Pre-Construction Notification to the Army Corps of Engineers if all General and Regional Conditions specified in this Nationwide Permit are met. Based on a review of the project plans and the Nationwide Permit conditions, these projects are anticipated to qualify for coverage under a non-notifying NWP-25.
If during pre-application agency coordination, USACE determines that Pre-Construction Notification is required, this optional task will include preparation of a PCN, coordination with USACE, and review of the draft permit prior to City signature.
Fee For Services
The total cost for each scope item listed above is included below. This fee estimate assumes Yuba City will be responsible for paying application fees required by the regulatory agencies. A breakdown of the hours needed to complete each task is included on the following page.
Task 1: Pre-Application Agency Coordination - $2,560
Task 2: CDFW §1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement - $8,420 Task 3: CWA §401 Water Quality Certification - $8,020
Task 4: CWA §404 Nationwide Permit (OPTIONAL) - $9,290
Please feel free to contact me at [email protected] or by phone at (916) 858-0642 if you need anything else for your review of this project.
Thank you,
Scott Salembier
Associate Environmental Planner/Biologist
ISA Certified Arborist
Dokken Engineering
110 Blue Ravine Rd. #200
Folsom, CA 95630
Environmental Manager
Senior Environmental
Planner / Biologist /
Archaeologist
Associate Environmental
Planner / Biologist /
Archaeologist
Environmental Planner /
Biologist / Archaeologist
$250 $180 $140 $110
Envvironmental Permitting Services 6 24 78 105 213 $28,290 Task 1: Pre-Application Agency Coordination 8 8 16 $2,560 Task 2: CDFW §1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement 2 4 20 40 66 $8,420 Task 3: CWA §401 Water Quality Certification 2 4 25 30 61 $8,020 Task 4: CWA §404 Nationwide Permit Authorization (OPTIONAL) 2 8 25 35 70 $9,290 TOTAL HOURS 6 24 78 105 213
TOTAL COST $1,500 $4,320 $10,920 $11,550 $28,290
COST PROPOSAL - HOURS BREAKDOWN BY TASK
GILSIZER SLOUGH TRASH CAPTURE &
NORTH DETENTION BASIN PROJECT
March 10, 2022
TASK DESCRIPTION TOTAL
HOURS
TOTAL
COST
OTHER
DIRECT
COST
West Yost 2022 Billing Rate Schedule
Attachment D
(Effective January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022)*
POSITIONS
ENGINEERING
Principal/Vice President $300
Engineer/Scientist/Geologist Manager I / II $285 / $297 Principal Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $257 / $272 Senior Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $230 / $241
Associate Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $198 / $211 Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $158 / $184
Engineering Aide $92
Field Monitoring Services $85
Administrative I / II / III / IV $81 / $102 / $123 / $136
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
Engineering Tech Manager I / II $294 / $297
Principal Tech Specialist I / II $270 / $280
Senior Tech Specialist I / II $247 / $260
Senior GIS Analyst $224
GIS Analyst $212
Technical Specialist I / II / III / IV $158 / $181 / $204 / $227 Technical Analyst I / II $114 / $136
Technical Analyst Intern $91
Cross-Connection Control Specialist I / II / III / IV $117 / $128 / $144 / $160 CAD Manager $179
CAD Designer I / II $139 / $155
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Senior Construction Manager $288
Construction Manager I / II / III / IV $175 / $187 / $200 / $252 Resident Inspector (Prevailing Wage Groups 4 / 3 / 2 / 1) $153 / $171 / $189 / $197 Apprentice Inspector $139
CM Administrative I / II $75 / $100
Field Services $198
2022 Billing Rate Schedule
LABOR CHARGES
(DOLLARS PER HOUR)
■ Technology and Communication charges including general and CAD computer, software, telephone, routine in-house copies/prints, postage, miscellaneous supplies, and other incidental project expenses will be billed at 6% of West Yost labor. ■ Outside Services such as vendor reproductions, prints, shipping, and major West Yost reproduction efforts, as well as Engineering Supplies, etc. will be billed at actual cost plus 15%. ■ The Federal Mileage Rate will be used for mileage charges and will be based on the Federal Mileage Rate applicable to when the mileage costs were incurred. Travel other than mileage will be billed at cost. ■ Subconsultants will be billed at actual cost plus 10%. ■ Expert witness, research, technical review, analysis, preparation and meetings billed at 150% of standard hourly rates. Expert witness testimony and depositions billed at 200% of standard hourly rates. ■ A Finance Charge of 1.5% per month (an Annual Rate of 18%) on the unpaid balance will be added to invoice amounts if not paid within 45 days from the date of the invoice. * This schedule is updated annually Page 1 of 2
(Effective January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022)*
Equipment Charges
EQUIPMENT
2" Purge Pump & Control Box $270 / day
Aquacalc / Pygmy or AA Flow Meter $28 / day
Emergency SCADA System $35 / day
Gas Detector $80 / day
Generator $39 / day
Hydrant Pressure Gauge $10 / day
Hydrant Pressure Recorder, Impulse (Transient) $55 / day Hydrant Pressure Recorder, Standard $40 / day
Low Flow Pump Controller $75 / day
Powers Water Level Meter $32 / day
Precision Water Level Meter $19 / day
Stainless Steel Wire per foot $0.03 / day
Storage Tank $15 / day
Sump Pump $24 / day
Transducer Components (per installation) $23 / day
Trimble GPS – Geo 7x $220 / day
Tube Length Counter $22 / day
Turbidity Meter $22 / day
Vehicle $10 / day
Water Flow Probe Meter $20 / day
Water Quality Meter $27 / day
Water Quality Multimeter $185 / day
Well Sounder $30 / day
BILLING RATES
2022 Billing Rate Schedule
* This schedule is updated annually Page 2 of 2
2020 Research Park Drive
Suite 100
Davis CA 95618
530.756.5905 phone
530.756.5991 fax
westyost.com
November 14, 2022 SENT VIA: EMAIL
Mr. William Jow
Assistant Engineer
City of Yuba City
Public Works Department
1201 Civic Center Blvd.
Yuba City, CA 95993
SUBJECT: Proposal for Calibration of the Regional Drainage Model (Gilsizer Slough Portion) Dear William:
West Yost is pleased to provide the City of Yuba City (City) with this proposal to calibrate the Gilsizer Slough portion of the regional drainage model. This work is to be completed jointly with the calibration of the Live Oak Canal portion, which will be funded by the Sutter County. The calibration will be based on the large October 2021 storm event and will cover both the Gilsizer Slough Watershed and the Live Oak Canal Watershed.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of services is described below by work task.
Task 1. Data Collection
The City and County are to provide the following:
Photographs of the flooding along with concise descriptions of the photo locations. Stage and flow data for the new gages in both the Gilsizer Slough and Live Oak Canal. North Gilsizer Detention Basin stage data (if available) and pump operation records. Rain records for all available City or County rain gages and the gage locations.
West Yost will also obtain the California Irrigation Management Information System rain gage data, and we will attempt to obtain pump operation data for the California Department of Water Resources pump stations.
As a subconsultant to West Yost, Slooten Engineering will survey up to 5 water surface elevations (WSEs) based on flood photos to the best of their ability. Slooten will also verify the elevation datums for the gages in both the Gilsizer Slough and Live Oak Canal. Slooten Engineering will provide up to half a day of surveying.
Task 1 Deliverables
Summary of the collected data
Mr. William Jow
November 14, 2022
N-M-C-YUBA-LP-2022TRASH CAPTURE-AMENDMENT A
Task 2. Model the October 2021 Storm Event Using the Previously Verified Model and Assess the Adequacy of the Previous Verification The regional model was previously verified by running the 3-year design storm and having City and County staff verify that the model results were generally consistent with the regularly observed flooding. At that time, there was not flow or stage data available for a model calibration.
We will run the October 2021 Storm event with the previously verified model. We will prepare up to three comparison stagegraphs and three comparison hydrographs. We will compare the pump station operation data with the pump station operations from the model. We will compare the estimated WSEs from the flood photos with the modeled WSEs.
We will summarize these evaluations in a concise Draft Technical Memorandum (TM). The TM will provide an overall assessment of the adequacy of the past model verification and, if needed, provide recommendations of how to calibrate the model using the now-available data. We will meet with City and County staff to discuss the findings in the TM.
Task 2 Deliverables
Draft TM
Task 3. Calibrate the Model using the October 2021 Storm Event and the NowAvailable Data This task will be implemented after the meeting from Task 2 and only if City and County staff agree this calibration task is needed.
We will revise the model input data to better match the now-available data. We anticipate the infiltration rates will be adjusted if they achieve better agreement of the overall runoff volumes. Other variables will be adjusted to achieve better agreement of the peak flows and maximum WSEs.
We will revise the Task 2 work products to also include a description of the calibration process and the results from the calibrated model. We will finalize the Draft TM (from Task 2) by including the results of Task 3.
BUDGET AND SCHEDULE
The proposed budget is shown in Table 1 by task. West Yost will perform the scope of services described above on a time-and-expenses basis at the billing rates established in the attached rate schedule. Any additional services not included in this Scope of Work will be performed only after receiving a written amendment to the contract. Task 2 will be completed within three weeks after receiving all the available data from the City, County, and State. Task 3 work will take place three weeks after the Task 2 meeting and receiving direction to perform Task 3.
Mr. William Jow
November 14, 2022
N-M-C-YUBA-LP-2022TRASH CAPTURE-AMENDMENT A
Table 1. Budget and Schedule Summary
Task Cost, dollars
Task 1. Data Collection 2,950
Task 2. Model the October 2021 Storm Event Using the Previously Verified Model and Assess the Adequacy of the Previous Verification
2,900
Task 3. Calibrate the Model using the October 2021 Storm Event and the Now Available Data
4,300
Total $10,150
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
WEST YOST
Douglas T. Moore, PE
Engineering Manager
RCE #58122
(Effective January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023)*
POSITIONS
ENGINEERING
Principal/Vice President $318
Engineer/Scientist/Geologist Manager I / II $303 / $315 Principal Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $273 / $288 Senior Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $244 / $255
Associate Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $204 / $217 Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $163 / $190
Engineering Aide $95
Field Monitoring Services $118
Administrative I / II / III / IV $85 / $108 / $131 / $144
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
Engineering Tech Manager I / II $312 / $315
Principal Tech Specialist I / II $286 / $297
Senior Tech Specialist I / II $262 / $276
Senior GIS Analyst $238
GIS Analyst $225
Technical Specialist I / II / III / IV $168 / $192 / $216 / $241 Technical Analyst I / II $121 / $144
Technical Analyst Intern $97
Cross-Connection Control Specialist I / II / III / IV $125 / $136 / $152 / $170 CAD Manager $190
CAD Designer I / II $147 / $165
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Senior Construction Manager $306
Construction Manager I / II / III / IV $185 / $199 / $212 / $268 Resident Inspector (Prevailing Wage Groups 4 / 3 / 2 / 1) $163 / $181 / $201 / $209 Apprentice Inspector $147
CM Administrative I / II $79 / $106
Field Services $210
2023 Billing Rate Schedule
LABOR CHARGES
(DOLLARS PER HOUR)
■ Technology and Communication charges including general and CAD computer, software, telephone, routine in-house copies/prints, postage, miscellaneous supplies, and other incidental project expenses will be billed at 6% of West Yost labor. ■ Outside Services such as vendor reproductions, prints, shipping, and major West Yost reproduction efforts, as well as Engineering Supplies, etc. will be billed at actual cost plus 15%. ■ The Federal Mileage Rate will be used for mileage charges and will be based on the Federal Mileage Rate applicable to when the mileage costs were incurred. Travel other than mileage will be billed at cost. ■ Subconsultants will be billed at actual cost plus 10%. ■ Expert witness, research, technical review, analysis, preparation and meetings billed at 150% of standard hourly rates. Expert witness testimony and depositions billed at 200% of standard hourly rates. ■ A Finance Charge of 1.5% per month (an Annual Rate of 18%) on the unpaid balance will be added to invoice amounts if not paid within 45 days from the date of the invoice. * This schedule is updated annually Page 1 of 2
(Effective January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023)*
Equipment Charges
EQUIPMENT
2" Purge Pump & Control Box $300 / day
Aquacalc / Pygmy or AA Flow Meter $28 / day
Emergency SCADA System $35 / day
Field Vehicles (Groundwater) $1 / mile
Gas Detector $80 / day
Generator $60 / day
Hydrant Pressure Gauge $10 / day
Hydrant Pressure Recorder, Impulse (Transient) $55 / day Hydrant Pressure Recorder, Standard $40 / day
Low Flow Pump Back Pack $135 / day
Low Flow Pump Controller $200 / day
Powers Water Level Meter $32 / day
Precision Water Level Meter 300ft $30 / day
Precision Water Level Meter 500ft $40 / day
Precision Water Level Meter 700ft $45 / day
QED Sample Pro Bladder Pump $65 / day
Stainless Steel Wire per foot $0 / day
Storage Tank $20 / day
Sump Pump $24 / day
Transducer Components (per installation) $23 / day
Trimble GPS – Geo 7x $220 / day
Tube Length Counter $22 / day
Turbidity Meter $30 / day
Vehicle (Construction Management) $10 / hour
Water Flow Probe Meter $20 / day
Water Quality Meter $50 / day
Water Quality Multimeter $185 / day
Well Sounder $30 / day
BILLING RATES
2023 Billing Rate Schedule
* This schedule is updated annually Page 2 of 2
2020 Research Park Drive
Suite 100
Davis CA 95618
530.756.5905 phone
530.756.5991 fax
westyost.com
November 14, 2022 SENT VIA: EMAIL
Mr. William Jow
Assistant Engineer
City of Yuba City
Public Works Department
1201 Civic Center Blvd.
Yuba City, CA 95993
SUBJECT: Proposal for Calibration of the Regional Drainage Model (Gilsizer Slough Portion) Dear William:
West Yost is pleased to provide the City of Yuba City (City) with this proposal to calibrate the Gilsizer Slough portion of the regional drainage model. This work is to be completed jointly with the calibration of the Live Oak Canal portion, which will be funded by the Sutter County. The calibration will be based on the large October 2021 storm event and will cover both the Gilsizer Slough Watershed and the Live Oak Canal Watershed.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of services is described below by work task.
Task 1. Data Collection
The City and County are to provide the following:
Photographs of the flooding along with concise descriptions of the photo locations. Stage and flow data for the new gages in both the Gilsizer Slough and Live Oak Canal. North Gilsizer Detention Basin stage data (if available) and pump operation records. Rain records for all available City or County rain gages and the gage locations.
West Yost will also obtain the California Irrigation Management Information System rain gage data, and we will attempt to obtain pump operation data for the California Department of Water Resources pump stations.
As a subconsultant to West Yost, Slooten Engineering will survey up to 5 water surface elevations (WSEs) based on flood photos to the best of their ability. Slooten will also verify the elevation datums for the gages in both the Gilsizer Slough and Live Oak Canal. Slooten Engineering will provide up to half a day of surveying.
Task 1 Deliverables
Summary of the collected data
Mr. William Jow
November 14, 2022
N-M-C-YUBA-LP-2022TRASH CAPTURE-AMENDMENT A
Task 2. Model the October 2021 Storm Event Using the Previously Verified Model and Assess the Adequacy of the Previous Verification The regional model was previously verified by running the 3-year design storm and having City and County staff verify that the model results were generally consistent with the regularly observed flooding. At that time, there was not flow or stage data available for a model calibration.
We will run the October 2021 Storm event with the previously verified model. We will prepare up to three comparison stagegraphs and three comparison hydrographs. We will compare the pump station operation data with the pump station operations from the model. We will compare the estimated WSEs from the flood photos with the modeled WSEs.
We will summarize these evaluations in a concise Draft Technical Memorandum (TM). The TM will provide an overall assessment of the adequacy of the past model verification and, if needed, provide recommendations of how to calibrate the model using the now-available data. We will meet with City and County staff to discuss the findings in the TM.
Task 2 Deliverables
Draft TM
Task 3. Calibrate the Model using the October 2021 Storm Event and the NowAvailable Data This task will be implemented after the meeting from Task 2 and only if City and County staff agree this calibration task is needed.
We will revise the model input data to better match the now-available data. We anticipate the infiltration rates will be adjusted if they achieve better agreement of the overall runoff volumes. Other variables will be adjusted to achieve better agreement of the peak flows and maximum WSEs.
We will revise the Task 2 work products to also include a description of the calibration process and the results from the calibrated model. We will finalize the Draft TM (from Task 2) by including the results of Task 3.
BUDGET AND SCHEDULE
The proposed budget is shown in Table 1 by task. West Yost will perform the scope of services described above on a time-and-expenses basis at the billing rates established in the attached rate schedule. Any additional services not included in this Scope of Work will be performed only after receiving a written amendment to the contract. Task 2 will be completed within three weeks after receiving all the available data from the City, County, and State. Task 3 work will take place three weeks after the Task 2 meeting and receiving direction to perform Task 3.
Mr. William Jow
November 14, 2022
N-M-C-YUBA-LP-2022TRASH CAPTURE-AMENDMENT A
Table 1. Budget and Schedule Summary
Task Cost, dollars
Task 1. Data Collection 2,950
Task 2. Model the October 2021 Storm Event Using the Previously Verified Model and Assess the Adequacy of the Previous Verification
2,900
Task 3. Calibrate the Model using the October 2021 Storm Event and the Now Available Data
4,300
Total $10,150
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
WEST YOST
Douglas T. Moore, PE
Engineering Manager
RCE #58122
(Effective January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023)*
POSITIONS
ENGINEERING
Principal/Vice President $318
Engineer/Scientist/Geologist Manager I / II $303 / $315 Principal Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $273 / $288 Senior Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $244 / $255
Associate Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $204 / $217 Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $163 / $190
Engineering Aide $95
Field Monitoring Services $118
Administrative I / II / III / IV $85 / $108 / $131 / $144
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
Engineering Tech Manager I / II $312 / $315
Principal Tech Specialist I / II $286 / $297
Senior Tech Specialist I / II $262 / $276
Senior GIS Analyst $238
GIS Analyst $225
Technical Specialist I / II / III / IV $168 / $192 / $216 / $241 Technical Analyst I / II $121 / $144
Technical Analyst Intern $97
Cross-Connection Control Specialist I / II / III / IV $125 / $136 / $152 / $170 CAD Manager $190
CAD Designer I / II $147 / $165
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Senior Construction Manager $306
Construction Manager I / II / III / IV $185 / $199 / $212 / $268 Resident Inspector (Prevailing Wage Groups 4 / 3 / 2 / 1) $163 / $181 / $201 / $209 Apprentice Inspector $147
CM Administrative I / II $79 / $106
Field Services $210
2023 Billing Rate Schedule
LABOR CHARGES
(DOLLARS PER HOUR)
■ Technology and Communication charges including general and CAD computer, software, telephone, routine in-house copies/prints, postage, miscellaneous supplies, and other incidental project expenses will be billed at 6% of West Yost labor. ■ Outside Services such as vendor reproductions, prints, shipping, and major West Yost reproduction efforts, as well as Engineering Supplies, etc. will be billed at actual cost plus 15%. ■ The Federal Mileage Rate will be used for mileage charges and will be based on the Federal Mileage Rate applicable to when the mileage costs were incurred. Travel other than mileage will be billed at cost. ■ Subconsultants will be billed at actual cost plus 10%. ■ Expert witness, research, technical review, analysis, preparation and meetings billed at 150% of standard hourly rates. Expert witness testimony and depositions billed at 200% of standard hourly rates. ■ A Finance Charge of 1.5% per month (an Annual Rate of 18%) on the unpaid balance will be added to invoice amounts if not paid within 45 days from the date of the invoice. * This schedule is updated annually Page 1 of 2
(Effective January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023)*
Equipment Charges
EQUIPMENT
2" Purge Pump & Control Box $300 / day
Aquacalc / Pygmy or AA Flow Meter $28 / day
Emergency SCADA System $35 / day
Field Vehicles (Groundwater) $1 / mile
Gas Detector $80 / day
Generator $60 / day
Hydrant Pressure Gauge $10 / day
Hydrant Pressure Recorder, Impulse (Transient) $55 / day Hydrant Pressure Recorder, Standard $40 / day
Low Flow Pump Back Pack $135 / day
Low Flow Pump Controller $200 / day
Powers Water Level Meter $32 / day
Precision Water Level Meter 300ft $30 / day
Precision Water Level Meter 500ft $40 / day
Precision Water Level Meter 700ft $45 / day
QED Sample Pro Bladder Pump $65 / day
Stainless Steel Wire per foot $0 / day
Storage Tank $20 / day
Sump Pump $24 / day
Transducer Components (per installation) $23 / day
Trimble GPS – Geo 7x $220 / day
Tube Length Counter $22 / day
Turbidity Meter $30 / day
Vehicle (Construction Management) $10 / hour
Water Flow Probe Meter $20 / day
Water Quality Meter $50 / day
Water Quality Multimeter $185 / day
Well Sounder $30 / day
BILLING RATES
2023 Billing Rate Schedule
* This schedule is updated annually Page 2 of 2
Exhibit B
the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City.
6. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the City immediately for cause or by either party without cause upon fifteen days written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination. Such compensation is subject to the conditions of Section 4 of this agreement.
7. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notes and internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant’s expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon request. * Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regards to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.
Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant, which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City’s name or insignia, photographs relating to project for which Consultant’s services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant’s services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or
radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.
8. Consultant’s Books and Records:
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrated performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement.
c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Administrator, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant’s address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement.
d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant’s business, City may, by written request by any of the above named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant’s representatives, or Consultant’s successorin-interest.
9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City.
Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City’s employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights.
Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
a. Will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and
b. Possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(B)(2).)
10.Interest of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s services hereunder.
Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.
11.Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant’s field of expertise.
12.Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations.
13.Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature, which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Yuba City business license.
14.Indemnity. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs, including attorney fees and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the performance of this Agreement in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Consultant, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by the Consultant or anyone for whose acts the Consultant may be liable, or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claim arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers.
15.Insurance Requirements. Consultant, at Consultant’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, necessary insurance policies as described in Exhibit B.
16.Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below.
Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.
If to City William Jow
Public Works Department
City of Yuba City
1201 Civic Center Blvd
Yuba City, CA 95993
(530) 822-4792
If to Consultant: Jeff Pelz
Principal-in-Charge
West Yost & Associates, Inc.
2020 Research Park Drive
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 574-4832
17.Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement.
18.Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
19.Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under the Agreement without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law.
20.Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.
21.Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
22.Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Sutter.
23.Litigation Expenses and Attorneys’ Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys’ fees.
24.Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and shall divide the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS/ENDISPUTE (“JAMS”) or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation.
25.Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.
26.Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement.
Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.
27.Prohibited Interest. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising there from.
2020 Research Park Drive
Suite 100
Davis CA 95618
530.756.5905 phone
530.756.5991 fax
westyost.com
March 16, 2022 SENT VIA: EMAIL
Mr. William Jow
Assistant Engineer
City of Yuba City
Public Works Department
1201 Civic Center Blvd.
Yuba City, CA 95993
SUBJECT: Proposal for Engineering Services for Design of the Gilsizer North Detention Basin Improvements and the Gilsizer Slough at Lincoln Road Improvements Dear William:
West Yost is pleased to provide the City of Yuba City (City) with this proposal to prepare plans, technical specifications, and cost estimates and to provide permitting services for the Design of the Gilsizer North Detention Basin Improvements and the Gilsizer Slough at Lincoln Road Improvements (Projects). West Yost is uniquely qualified to efficiently design these projects because we prepared predesign level Technical Memoranda (TMs) on each project on June 28, 2018, and because we developed the Gilsizer Slough drainage model, which will be used to verify design level water surface elevations and flow rates. This proposal covers design services based on the predesign TMs. The proposed scope of services, budget, and schedule are described below. Two days of surveying will be performed by Slooten Surveying as a subconsultant to West Yost. All geotechnical engineering work will be performed by Geocon Consultants, Inc.(GCI) as a subconsultant to West Yost (see Attachment A). All structural design work will be performed by VE Solutions (Bradley A.
Freiderichs, SE) as a subconsultant to West Yost (see Attachment B). The Environmental Permitting will be performed by Dokken Engineering as a subconsultant to West Yost (see Attachment C).
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of services is described below by work task.
Task 1. Project Management and Meetings
We will manage the project and project staff to ensure the project remains on budget and on schedule.
We will conduct a kickoff meeting with City staff (and County staff if they choose to participate in the design effort). The kickoff meeting will be conducted in-person and will include a site visit to each project site and improvement location. We will also discuss options for bidding and constructing the projects. We will prepare a summary of the kickoff meeting for review and approval by the City.
We will also conduct: 1) a 50% design review meeting via Microsoft Teams; 2) an on-site 90% design review meeting; and 3) a 100% design review meeting via Microsoft Teams. The purpose of the design review meetings is to obtain City (and County) comment on the design submittals.
Mr. William Jow
March 16, 2022
Task 1 Deliverables
• Meeting agenda and notes
Task 2. Data Collection (Design Level Surveys and Geotechnical Evaluations)
All surveying will be performed by Slooten Surveying as a subconsultant to West Yost. Slooten Surveying will perform design level surveying of the Corp Yard fueling area, the North Gilsizer Detention Basin and Pump Station, and the Gilsizer Slough at Lincoln Road to 200 feet south of Lincoln Road.
All geotechnical engineering work will be performed by GCI. GCI will perform the geotechnical investigation at the Corp Yard fuel area for design of the fuel area roof. The geotechnical evaluation will include:
• Performing up to two borings at the Corp Yard fuel area • Performing Laboratory testing to prepare design parameters • Preparing a geotechnical engineering report
Task 2 Deliverables
• Topographic Survey in AutoCAD format
• Geotechnical Report
Task 3. Design of Trash Capture Facilities and Gilsizer North Detention Basin Improvements
This task includes design of the following items:
• Trash capture screen in Gilsizer Slough just south of Lincoln Road. • Trash capture screen at the inlet to the North Gilsizer Detention Basin Pump Station. • Bioswales from each storm drain outlet to the North Gilsizer Detention Basin trash capture screen. Culverts will be included in the bioswales to ensure vehicle access to all areas of the basin.
• Filling of the existing low flow channels in the bottom of the existing North Gilsizer Detention Basin.
• If authorized, grading the bottom of the basin to increase the storage volume to mitigate for future development in the tributary watershed (see optional subtask below).
The predesign TM also shows a baseball diamond and a pedestrian access gate from the existing nearby baseball fields in the project, but these two improvements are not included in this design task.
The design will include the following sheets:
• G1 – Title Sheet and Location Maps
• G2 – Abbreviations, Notes, and legend
• G3 – Overall Plan, Key Map, and Survey Control
Mr. William Jow
March 16, 2022
• C1 – Gilsizer North Detention Basin Grading Plan (at 1 inch = 40 feet) • C2 – Gilsizer North Detention Basin Bioswale Details and Sections (including seed mix) • C3 – Gilsizer North Detention Basin Trash Screen Details and Sections • C4 – Gilsizer Slough South of Lincoln Road Trash Screen Details and Sections • S1 – Trash Screen Structural Design
• S2 – Trash Screen Structural Notes
The 65% design submittal will include Sheets G1 through C4. The 90%, 100%, and Final (for bid and construction) submittals will include all the design sheets (including Sheets S1 and S2).
We will prepare and submit draft technical specifications with the 90% design and final technical specifications with the 100% design. The following technical specifications are anticipated. • 01010 Summary of Work
• 01140 Work Sequence and Constraints
• 01200 Measurement and Payment
• 01322 Construction Schedule
• 01325 Field Engineering
• 01330 Contractor Submittals
• 01450 Quality Control
• 01505 Mobilization
• 01500 Construction Facilities
and Utilities
• 01560 Environmental Controls
• 01570 Storm Water Quality Control
• 01770 Project Closeout
• 01780 Record Drawings
• 01910 Hazardous Material Procedures
• 02017 Geotextile Fabrics
• 02081 Controlled Low Strength Material
• 02221 Demolition, Salvage,
and Abandonment
• 02241 Control of Water
• 02200 Site Preparation
• 02260 Excavation Support and Protection
• 02300 Earthwork
• 02950 Site Restoration
• 02385 Rock Slope Protection
• 02925 Hydroseeding
• 03301 Cast-in-Place Concrete (for
small projects)
• 05100 Structural Metals
• 02635 Reinforced Concrete Pipe
• 05501 Anchor Bolts
An Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) will be prepared and submitted with the 50% and 90% submittals
Task 3 Deliverables
• Concept Drawings
• 50% Drawings and OPCC
• 90% Drawings, Technical Specifications, and OPCC
• 100% Drawings and Technical Specifications
• Final Submittal Including Signed Drawings and Signed Technical Specifications Task 3 Assumptions
• All submittals will be in electronic PDF format
Mr. William Jow
March 16, 2022
Task 4 Design of Corp Yard Improvements
This task includes design of the following items:
• Retractable tarps for material storage areas
• Permanent roof over Corp Yard fuel station and drainage and water quality requirements consistent with the Fueling Area design guidelines in the Sacramento Region Stormwater Quality Design Manual (to the extent possible given the existing site constraints) The design will include the following sheets:
• G1 – Title Sheet and Location Maps
• G2 – Abbreviations, Notes, and legend
• G3 - Overall Plan, Key Map, and Survey Control
• C1 – Retractable Tarps and Associated Details
• C2 – Fueling Area Site Plan and Grading
• C3 – Fueling Area Details and Sections
• S1 – Fueling Area Roof Structural Design
• S2 – Fueling Area Structural Notes
The 50% design submittal will include Sheets G1 through C3. The 90%, 100%, and Final (for bid and construction) submittals will include all the design sheets (including Sheets S1 and S2).
We will prepare and submit draft technical specifications with the 90% design and final technical specification with the 100% design. The following technical specifications are anticipated. • 01010 Summary of Work
• 01140 Work Sequence and Constraints
• 01200 Measurement and Payment
• 01322 Construction Schedule
• 01325 Field Engineering
• 01330 Contractor Submittals
• 01450 Quality Control
• 01505 Mobilization
• 01500 Construction Facilities
and Utilities
• 01560 Environmental Controls
• 01570 Storm Water Quality Control
• 01770 Project Closeout
• 01780 Record Drawings
• 01910 Hazardous Material Procedures
• 02017 Geotextile Fabrics
• 02221 Demolition, Salvage,
and Abandonment
• 02200 Site Preparation
• 02260 Excavation Support and Protection
• 02300 Earthwork
• 02950 Site Restoration
• 2953 Pavement Restoration
• 03301 Cast-in-Place Concrete (for
small projects)
• 05100 Structural Metals
• 05120 Structural Steel
• 05300 Steel Roof Deck
• 05501 Anchor Bolts
An OPCC will be prepared and submitted with the 50% and 90% submittals
Mr. William Jow
March 16, 2022
Task 4 Deliverables
• Concept Drawings
• 50% Submittal including C- Drawings and OPCC
• 90% Submittal Including all Drawings, Draft Technical Specifications and OPCC • 100% Submittal Including all Drawings and Final Technical Specifications • Final Submittal Including Signed Drawings and Signed Technical Specifications Task 4 Assumptions
• All submittals will be in electronic PDF format
Task 5. Environmental Permitting Support
The following permits are anticipated for the Lincoln Road Trash Capture Screen and potentially also for the Gilsizer North Detention Basin Improvements:
• Pre-Application Agency Coordination
• California Department of Fish and Wildlife Stream Bed Alternation Agreement • Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
As a subconsultant to West Yost, Dokken Engineering will provide initial coordination with the permitting agencies, prepare the permit applications, and provide follow-up coordination with the permitting agencies. If needed, the Clean Water Act Section 404 USA Army Corps of Engineers permit application has been included as an optional task (Task 7 below).
This proposal does not include a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) evaluation nor associated cultural or biological data base evaluations or site-specific field evaluation. The City is to provide copies of the needed CEQA evaluation and associated studies for use for the environmental permitting applications and support.
Task 5 Deliverables
• Permit Pre-Application Coordination Summary emails, CDFW Streambed Alteration Agreement Application, CWA Section 401 Certification Application.
Task 6. Project–Specific Full Capture System Certification Application (Updated April 2021) Support
We will review the previously approved trash screens and devices that could be used at each of the trash capture sites (see Certified Full Capture System List of Trash Treatment Control Devices). We will also review the requirements for use of a detention basin for trash capture (see Detention Basins Multi-Benefit Trash Treatment Systems). We will try to identify trash screen technologies that have already been approved by the State and are suitable for use at each trash screen site. If approved technologies are available, we will discuss their use with you and jointly determine if the approved technologies should be used in the Task 2 design drawings. If no suitable technology exists already, we will prepare a Project– Specific Full Capture System Certification Application, including the required information that can be developed with the drainage model and the design effort. However, there may be some data that West Yost won’t be able to generate, like the field/lab testing Information and analysis. Because it is
Mr. William Jow
March 16, 2022
currently unclear if approved technologies are available or how much effort will be needed to gain approval of site-specific designs, we have allocated up to 24 hours for this task. We will not expend more than 24 hours of effort without your prior approval.
Task 6 Deliverables
• Project–Specific Full Capture System Certification Application 50% Submittal including C- Drawings and OPCC
Task 6 Assumptions
• Application will be submitted if no Certified Full Capture System Trash Treatment Control Devices are suitable for the Project
• Some data required for the application will need to be provided by others.
Task 7. Optional Tasks
Grade the basin to provide adequate additional detention storage to mitigate for development of the currently undeveloped parcels within the tributary watershed If this optional subtask is authorized, we will run the drainage model for existing conditions and with full development of all the currently undeveloped parcels in the watershed tributary to the North Gilsizer Detention Basin for the 100-year storm. Using the model results, we will calculate the increase to the basin volume needed to mitigate for the development. We will document this evaluation (including a map of the parcels that are undeveloped now and assumed to develop in the future) in a concise TM. We will grade the basin to include the required increase in storage volume. The purpose for doing this grading is to eliminate one potential obstacle to future development (flood-related impacts from increased flows to the basin from development). Nevertheless, the development could result in other impacts that would still need to be mitigated (like increased flow in the tributary storm drains).
Although probably not needed, preparation of the Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit application is included as an optional task.
BUDGET AND SCHEDULE
The proposed budget is shown in Table 1 by task. West Yost will perform the scope of services described above on a time-and-expenses basis at the billing rates set forth in West Yost’s attached Billing Rate Schedule (Attachment D). Any additional services not included in this Scope of Work will be performed only after receiving a written amendment to the contract. The budget shown in Table 1 does not include the optional task. The budget for the optional task is $16,342. We will only perform the optional task work with written approval from the City.
The schedule is based on receiving a fully executed contract and notice to proceed by April 1, 2022.
Mr. William Jow
March 16, 2022
Table 1. Budget and Schedule Summary
Task Schedule Cost, dollars
Task 1. Project Management and Meetings On-going, meetings coordinated with design submittals
20,730
Task 2. Data Collection (Design Level Surveys
and Geotechnical Evaluations)
Surveying: April 30
Geotechnical Report: May 30
14,789
Task 3. Design of Trash Capture Facilities and
Gilsizer North Detention Basin
Improvements
Concepts: April 11
65%: May 30
90%: June 30
100%: July 22
Final Design: August 19
Draft Technical Specs: June 30
Final Technical Specs: July 22
Optional Task: April 30
62,863
Task 4. Design of Corp Yard Improvements Concepts: April 11 50%: May 30
90%: June 30
100%: July 22
Final Design: August 19
Draft Technical Specs: June 30
Final Technical Specs: July 22
35,787
Task 5. Environmental Permitting Support Draft Applications: June 30 23,621 Task 6. Project–Specific Full Capture System
Certification Application (Updated
April 2021) Support
Review Approved Systems: April 30
Certification Application: May 30
5,961
Total $163,751
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. We can revise this proposal to better match the City’s design requirements and budget limitations if needed.
Sincerely,
WEST YOST
Douglas T. Moore, PE
Engineering Manager
RCE #58122
Attachment(s): A. Geocon Consultants, Inc. Proposal
B. VE Solutions, Inc. Proposal
C. Dokken Engineering Proposal
D. West Yost 2022 Billing Rate Schedule
Geocon Consultants Inc. Proposal
Attachment A
Proposal No. LS-22-96
March 11, 2022
Doug Moore
Engineering Manager
WEST YOST
2020 Research Park Drive, Suite 100
Davis, CA 95618
[email protected]
Subject: PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
FUELING ISLAND CANOPY IMPORVEMENTS
YUBA CITY CORPORATION YARD
1185 MARKET STREET
YUBA CITY, CALIFORNIA
Mr. Moore:
In accordance with your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal to perform a geotechnical investigation for the proposed improvements for the fueling area at the City of Yuba City Corporation Yard located at 1185 Market Street in Yuba City, California.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
To aid in preparing this proposal we have discussed the project with you and reviewed project information you provided. The project includes constructing a canopy over the existing fueling islands at the City Corporation Yard. The canopy will likely be supported on cast-0in-drilled-hole (CIDH) concrete piers or conventional spread footings.
The purpose of our geotechnical investigation will be to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site and provide geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of the proposed project. Our investigation will include a field exploration program, geotechnical laboratory testing, engineering analysis, and report preparation.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Based on our understanding of the project, we propose the following scope of services:
• Perform a limited geologic literature review to aid in evaluating the geologic conditions present at the site.
• Review available design plans to select exploratory excavation locations. • Perform a site reconnaissance to review project limits and mark out exploratory excavation locations for subsequent utility clearance.
• Notify subscribing utility companies via Underground Service Alert (USA) a minimum of two business days (as required by law) prior to performing exploratory borings at the Site. • Drill up two exploratory borings within/near the proposed improvement area to a depth of approximately 15 feet using a truck-mounted drill rig equipped with hollow-stem augers.
Geocon Proposal No. LS-22-96 - 2 - March 11, 2022
• Obtain representative soil samples from the exploratory borings. • Log the borings in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. • Upon completion, backfill borings with the drill cuttings or neat cement grout. • Perform laboratory tests to evaluate pertinent geotechnical parameters. • Analyze the field and laboratory testing data and prepare a letter report with our conclusions and recommendations. Our report will include (but not be limited to) the following:
• Site plan showing locations of exploratory borings
• Description of site geology and logs of subsurface conditions • Geotechnical laboratory test results
• Summary of geotechnical constraints and mitigation alternatives (if required) • Foundation design recommendations and nparameters: recommended foundation type(s), allowable bearing capacity, recommended dimensions, estimated settlement • Code-based seismic design criteria (2019 California Building Code) An electronic (PDF) version of the draft geotechnical investigation report will be submitted. Upon receipt of review comments, we will incorporate comments and submit a final report in PDF format.
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS
Our scope of services and fees are based on:
• The client will coordinate site access and permission to enter. • The site is accessible to truck-mounted drilling equipment. • Site plans provided for our use will show the locations of all underground utility lines and structures. We will not be responsible for damage to any such lines or structures that are not shown accurately on the plans provided to us or properly marked by USA subscriber companies. • The scope of services detailed in this proposal does not include the evaluation or identification of environmental contamination.
PROPOSED FEE
We propose to perform the scope of services described herein for a lump sum fee of $7,500.
Our services will be provided in accordance with the enclosed 2022 Schedule of Fees/Terms and Conditions, which is incorporated into and made a part of this proposal. If unforeseen conditions are encountered, or if we experience delays or circumstances beyond our control, we will notify you immediately to discuss modifications to the scope of services and/or project fees.
CONTRACT EXECUTION
If this proposal is acceptable, please issue a Professional Services Agreement for our review. We will commence with the scope of services outlined herein upon receipt of your written authorization; however, services provided by Geocon will be pursuant to the terms stated in our 2022 Schedule of Fees until or unless a mutually agreed upon, negotiated contract is finalized.
Geocon Proposal No. LS-22-96 - 3 - March 11, 2022
We appreciate the opportunity to provide a proposal for geotechnical services on this project. Please contact us if you have any questions concerning the contents of this proposal or if we may be of further service.
Respectfully submitted,
GEOCON CONSULTANTS, INC.
Jeremy J. Zorne, PE, GE
Senior Engineer
Attachment: 2022 Schedule of Fees
3160 Gold Valley Drive, Suite 800 ■ Rancho Cordova, California 95742 ■ Tel (916) 852-9118
2022 SCHEDULE OF FEES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Engineering Assistant/Laboratory Technician.......................................................................................................................................... $85/hr.
Engineering Field Technician/Special Inspector I ................................................................................................................ 85/125(PW)*/hr.
Engineering Field Technician/Special Inspector II ............................................................................................................... 95/135(PW)*/hr.
Engineering Field Technician/Special Inspector III/Equipment Operator ........................................................................... 105/145(PW)*/hr.
Word Processor/Technical Editor/Draftsman .......................................................................................................................................... 85/hr.
Research Assistant/Technical Illustrator/Senior Draftsman................................................................................................................... 100/hr.
Project Coordinator/GIS Specialist ........................................................................................................................................................... 110/hr.
Staff Engineer/Geologist/Scientist/Field Supervisor .............................................................................................................................. 125/hr.
Senior Staff Engineer/Geologist/Scientist ............................................................................................................................................... 135/hr.
Project Engineer/Geologist/Scientist/Construction Supervisor.............................................................................................................. 145/hr.
Senior Project Engineer/Geologist/Scientist............................................................................................................................................ 160/hr.
Senior Engineer/Geologist/Scientist/Certified Industrial Hygienist........................................................................................................ 175/hr.
Associate Engineer/Geologist/Scientist................................................................................................................................................... 200/hr.
Principal Engineer/Geologist/Scientist/Litigation Support ..................................................................................................................... 240/hr.
Deposition or Court Appearance............................................................................................................................................................... 400/hr.
Attorney Fees (General) ............................................................................................................................................................................ 350/hr.
Overtime (>8 to 12 hrs.), Saturday, and Night Rate ............................................................................................... 1.5X Regular Hourly Rate Overtime (>12 hrs.), Sunday, and Holiday Rate.......................................................................................................... 2X Regular Hourly Rate Minimum Professional Fee........................................................................................................................................................... $500/Project Minimum Field Services Fee (per day or call-out)................................................................................................................................... 4 Hours *Prevailing Wage (PW) per requirements of California Labor Code §720, et. Seq.
TRAVEL
Personnel ............................................................................................................................................................................ Regular Hourly Rate Subsistence (Per Diem)........................................................................................................................................................................ $200/day Vehicle Mileage .................................................................................................................................................................................... 0.75/mile
EQUIPMENT & ANALYTICAL TESTS
Nuclear Gauge ......................... Included in Technician Hourly Rate Level D PPE/Decon Rinse Equipment ............................ $50/day Pick-up Truck ................................................................... $125/day pH/Conductivity/Temperature Meter ............................. 60/day Equipment Truck .............................................................. 200/day 55-gallon drum ................................................................ 65/ea.
Direct-Push Rig/Operator ............................... 185/225(PW)*/hr. TPHg (EPA 8015M) .......................................................... 90/ea.
Direct-Push Sample Liner ................................................ 10/ea. TPHd/mo (EPA 8015M) ................................................... 80/ea.
Equipment Trailer ............................................................. 100/day Fuel Oxygenate Compounds (EPA 8260B) ..................... 110/ea.
Wenner 4-Pin Earth Resistivity Meter .............................. 150/day Volatile Organic Compounds (EPA 8260B) ..................... 150/ea.
Coring Machine (concrete, asphalt, masonry)................. 200/day Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (EPA 8270) ............. 300/ea.
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer ........................................... 250/day CAM 17 Metals (EPA 6010B) .......................................... 170/ea.
Dilatometer (DMT) Test Equipment ................................. 800/day Single Metal (EPA 6010B) ............................................... 30/ea.
Generator or Air Compressor............................................ 150/day STLC or TCLP Extraction .................................................. 75/ea.
GPS Unit ............................................................................ 160/day Soil pH (EPA 9045C) ........................................................ 25/ea.
Drive-Tube Sampler or Hand-Auger ................................. 50/day Organochlorine Pesticides (EPA 8081) ........................... 125/ea.
Soil Sample Tube (Brass or Stainless) ............................ 10/ea. Naturally Occurring Asbestos (CARB 435) ...................... 90/ea.
Water Level Indicator ....................................................... 40/day Asbestos PLM ................................................................... 20/ea.
Battery-Powered Pump .................................................... 75/day Asbestos 1,000-pt Count ................................................. 80/ea.
Photo-Ionization Meter .................................................... 150/day 48-hr/24-hr Turnaround Time .................... 60%/100% surcharge
LABORATORY TESTS
COMPACTION CURVES SOIL AND AGGREGATE STABILITY
4-inch mold (D1557/D698)............................................. $225/ea. Resistance Value, R-Value (D2844/CAL301)................. $300/ea. 6-inch mold (D1557/D698)............................................. 225/ea. R-Value, Treated (CAL301) .............................................. 325/ea.
California Impact (CAL216).............................................. 225/ea. California Bearing Ratio (D1883).................................... 175/pt.
Check Point....................................................................... 100/ea. Stabilization Ability of Lime (C977) ................................. 180/ea.
3160 Gold Valley Drive, Suite 800 ■ Rancho Cordova, California 95742 ■ Tel (916) 852-9118
SOIL AND AGGREGATE PROPERTIES
#200 Wash (D1140/C117) ............................................. $90/ea. Moisture Determination, tube sample (D2216)............. $20/ea.
Wet Sieve Analysis to #200 (D422/CAL202).................. 120/ea. Moisture Determination and Unit Weight (D2937) ........ 40/ea.
Dry Sieve Analysis, 1.5”+ Aggregate (D6913)................. 350/ea. Atterberg Limits: Plasticity Index (D4318) ...................... 200/ea.
Hydrometer Analysis (D422)............................................ 165/ea. Sand Equivalent (D2419/CAL217) ................................. 100/ea.
Sieve Analysis with Hydrometer (D422) .......................... 200/ea. pH and Resistivity (CAL643) ............................................ 120/ea.
Specific Gravity, Soil (T100)............................................. 100/ea. Sulfate Content (CAL417)................................................ 90/ea.
Specific Gravity Coarse Aggregate (C127)....................... 60/ea. Chloride Content (CAL422).............................................. 50/ea.
Specific Gravity Fine Aggregate (C128)........................... 75/ea. Organic Content (D2974)................................................. 65/ea.
Cut/Extract Shelby Tube .................................................. 100/ea.
SHEAR STRENGTH
Unconfined Compression (D2166).................................. $100/ea. CONCRETE / MASONRY / REINFORCING STEEL Direct Shear (3 pts.)(D3080) ........................................... 325/ea. Compressive Strength, Cast Cylinders (C39).................. $30/ea.
Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Shear (D2850)........ 125/pt. Compressive Strength, Cores (C42)................................ 60/ea.
Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Staged (D2850) ...... 175/ea. Flexural Strength Beam (C78/C293) .............................. 80/ea.
Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Shear (D4767) ............ 300/pt. Splitting Tensile Test (C496)............................................ 80/ea.
Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Staged (D4767) .......... 375/ea. DSA Masonry Shear (DSA-207) ....................................... 75/ea.
Consolidated-Drained Triaxial Shear (EM1110) ............. 400/pt. Shotcrete Panel Coring and Comp. Strength (C1140) ... 80/ea.
Consolidated-Drained Triaxial Staged (EM1110)............ 500/ea. Rebar Tensile / Bend (up to #11/#11 and Larger) 200/250/ea.
CMU Compressive Strength (C140) ................................ 100/ea.
PERMEABILITY, CONSOLIDATION AND EXPANSION Compressive Strength, Grout (C1019/UBC 21-19)........ 30/ea.
Permeability, Flexible Wall (D5084) ................................ $300/ea. Compressive Strength, Mortar (C109/UBC 21-15,16) .. 30/ea.
Permeability, Rigid Wall (D5856)..................................... 300/ea. CMU Unit Wt., Dimen., Absorption (C140) ...................... 75/ea.
Consolidation (D2435)..................................................... 60/pt. Compressive Strength, Masonry Prism (C1314) ............ 250/ea.
Expansion Index (D4829/UBC 29-2)............................... 225/ea.
Swell/Collapse (D4546)................................................... 165/pt. HOT MIX ASPHALT HMA Air Voids, Gyratory (T269) ....................................... $525/ea.
AGGREGATE QUALITY Hamburg Wheel Tracker (T324)...................................... 1,000/ea.
Sieve Analysis to #200 (C136) ........................................ $120/ea. Theoretical Max. Specific Gravity (D2041/CAL309) ...... 175/ea.
L.A. Rattler Test (500 rev.) (C131)................................... 200/ea. Ignition/Sieve Analysis (C136/CAL202) ......................... 220/ea.
Durability Index (D3744/CAL229)................................... 165/ea. HMA Core Unit Weight (D1188/CAL308)........................ 100/ea.
Fine Aggregate Angularity (CAL 234) ............................... 125/ea. % Asphalt, Ignition Method (D6307/CAL382)................ 125/ea.
Flat and Elongated Particles (D4791/CAL 235) ............. 150/ea. % Asphalt, Ignition Calibration (D6307/CAL382)............. 400/ea.
Percent Crushed Particles (CAL205) ............................... 150/ea. Tensile Strength Ratio (T283)……………………………… .... 1,000/ea. *2X surcharge on rush turnaround for laboratory testing
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Listed are typical charges for the services most frequently performed by Geocon. Prices for unlisted services as well as special quotations for programs involving volume work will be provided upon request. Laboratory test prices shown are for laboratory work only, and include reporting of routine results not calling for comments, recommendations or conclusions.
2. Sampling and testing is conducted in substantial conformance with the latest applicable or designated specifications of the American Society for Testing and Materials, Caltrans, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or other pertinent agencies.
3. Saturday, night work, and overtime hours are charged at time and one-half; Sundays and holidays at double time. Per diem may apply when location of work dictates.
4. Equipment and materials will be billed at cost plus 15%. Outside services including subcontractors and rental of special equipment are billed at cost plus 15%. Hourly services are billed portal to portal from closest office in accordance with the stated hourly rates herein, with a minimum four-hour charge.
5. Invoices will be submitted at four-week intervals. Terms of payment are met upon presentation of invoice. Invoices become delinquent thirty (30) days from invoice date and subject to one and one-half percent (1-1/2%) service charge per month, or the maximum rate allowed by law, whichever is lower. If Client objects to all or any portion of any invoice, Client will so notify Geocon in writing within fourteen (14) calendar days of the invoice date, identify the cause of disagreement, and pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute. The parties will immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion of the invoice.
Payment on delinquent invoices will first be applied to accrued interest and then to the principal amount. All time spent and expenses incurred (including any attorney's fees and costs) in connection with collection of any delinquent amount will be paid by Client to Geocon per Geocon's current fee schedule.
6. Client and Geocon shall allocate certain of the risks so that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Geocon’s (the term “Geocon” includes Geocon’s partners, officers, directors, employees, agents, affiliates, subcontractors and subconsultants) total aggregate liability to Client is limited to the greater of $10,000 or the total compensation received from Client by Geocon for services rendered on this project, for any and all of Client’s injuries, damages, claims, losses, expenses, or claim expenses arising out of this Agreement from any cause or causes, including attorneys’ fees and costs which may be awarded to the prevailing party, and Client agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Geocon from and against all liabilities in excess of the monetary limit established above.
Client and Geocon shall allocate certain of the other risks so that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Client shall limit Geocon’s total aggregate liability to all third parties, including contractors, subcontractors of all tiers, materialmen, and others involved in Client’s project, as well as persons and other entities not involved in the project, to the greater of $20,000 or the total compensation received from Client by Geocon for services rendered on this project, for any and all injuries, damages, cause or causes, including attorneys’ fees and costs which may be awarded to the prevailing party, and Client agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Geocon from and against all liabilities in excess of the monetary limit established above, including all liability incurred by Geocon for acts, errors, or omissions, pursuant to entering into agreements with third parties on behalf of Client in order to obtain access or entry onto property not owned by Client. Client agrees to notify all contractors and subcontractors of any limitation of Geocon’s liability to them, and require them to abide by such limitation for damages suffered by any contractor or subcontractor arising from Geocon’s actions or inactions. Neither the contractor nor any subcontractor assumes any liability for damages to others which may arise on account of Geocon’s actions or inactions.
VE Solutions, Inc. Proposal
Note: VE Solutions agreed to a 10 percent budget reduction from the amounts shown in this budget. Also, engineering services during construction (ESD) are not included in this proposal.
Attachment B
Task Order Agreement
VE Solutions, Inc.
7777 Greenback Lane, Suite 104
Citrus Heights, CA 95610
[email protected]
(916) 505-0519
Client: West Yost & Associates
2020 Research Park Dr., Ste 100
Davis, CA 95618
Date: March 10, 2022
Project Name/Location: Gilsizer North Detention Basin Structures VES Project No.: 22021
Project Description: Structural engineering services for:
1. A 2 ft max high structural steel trash capture screen. The screen will be attached to an existing concrete slab and will be designed to resist full unbalanced water head on one side.
2. A max 20’ x 20’ x 20’ high structural steel canopy over an existing fuel station. The canopy will be supported on new concrete spread footings or drilled piers.
A geotechnical report will be prepared by others.
Scope of Services: Prepare structural engineering plans and calculations for the project described above. Review rfi's and submittals during construction. Documents will be signed and sealed by a California registered structural engineer.
Fee Arrangement: Design: $12,000; ESDC: $2,500; Total $14,500 Limitation of Liability: $1,000,000
Special Conditions: none
Offered by: Accepted by:
signature date signature date
Brad Friederichs, President S2780
name/title CA License name/title
VE Solutions, Inc.
Client
The Terms and Conditions of this agreement are in accordance with the Task Order Agreement dated September 27, 2017
3/10/2022
Task Order Agreement
VE Solutions, Inc.
7777 Greenback Lane, Suite 104
Citrus Heights, CA 95610
[email protected]
(916) 505-0519
Client: West Yost & Associates
2020 Research Park Dr., Ste 100
Davis, CA 95618
Date: March 10, 2022
Project Name/Location: Gilsizer Slough Trash Capture Device VES Project No.: 22022
Project Description: Structural engineering services for 5 ft high structural steel screen to span across an existing channel. The structure will resist full unbalanced water head on one side. It will be supported on a new concrete slab.
Scope of Services: Prepare structural engineering plans and calculations for the project described above. Review rfi's and submittals during construction. Documents will be signed and sealed by a California registered structural engineer.
Fee Arrangement: Design: $11,500; ESDC: $2,500; Total $14,000 Limitation of Liability: $1,000,000
Special Conditions: none
Offered by: Accepted by:
signature date signature date
Brad Friederichs, President S2780
name/title CA License name/title
VE Solutions, Inc.
Client
The Terms and Conditions of this agreement are in accordance with the Task Order Agreement dated September 27, 2017
3/10/2022
Dokken Engineering Proposal
Note: Dokken Engineering agreed to a 5 percent budget reduction from the amounts shown in this budget. Also, the Clean Water Act Section 404 Nation Wide Permit Task (OPTIONAL) and the associated budget are included in the optional task of this proposal.
Attachment C
110 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 200, Folsom, CA 95630 ▪ Tele: 916 858-0642 ▪ Fax: 916 858-0643 ▪ www.dokkenengineering.com March 11, 2022
Doug Moore
Engineering Manager
West Yost
2020 Research Park Drive, Suite 100
Davis, CA 95618
RE: Scope and Fee for Environmental Permitting Services for the Gilsizer Slough Trash Capture Project and the Gilsizer North Detention Basin Project in Yuba City Mr. Doug Moore,
Enclosed is a scope of services and fee for Dokken Engineering to obtain the necessary environmental permits for the planned Gilsizer Slough Trash Capture Project and the Gilsizer North Detention Basin Project in Yuba City. It is our understanding that Gilsizer Slough is a realigned natural channel with historic hydrologic connection to the Feather River and is therefore considered a Water of the U.S. and Water of the State. As such, environmental permits under the Clean Water Act and State of California Fish and Game Code must be obtained prior to the start of construction. Environmental Analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is being completed by the City and is not included in this scope of work.
The southwestern terminus of Gilsizer slough is known to support stable populations of special status species including giant garter snake (Thamnophis gigas) and tricolor blackbird (Agelaius tricolor). The proposed Gilsizer Slough Trash Capture Project at Lincoln Rd. does not provide habitat for these species and is located approximately 10 miles upstream of this habitat area and there is no suitable habitat for these species farther upstream in the watershed. It is therefore unlikely that these species will be impacted by either project and this scope of work assumes that the project will not result in “take” of any species listed as threatened or endangered by either the Federal Endangered Species Act or California Endangered Species Act.
Scope of Work
Task 1: Pre-Application Agency Coordination
Prior to beginning the permit application process, Dokken will present the proposed project features to our contacts at the regulatory agencies and receive initial feed back on the permitting effort that will be required for both projects. The agencies contacted will include the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This early coordination effort will ensure the permit applications contain only the project features that require environmental permits, streamlining the permitting process and potentially reducing permitting and mitigation costs.
Task 2: California Fish and Game Code §1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement Dokken will prepare the necessary components of a Notification of Streambed Alteration Package for submittal to CDFW via the department’s online permitting portal the Electronic Permitting Information and Management System (EPIMS). Dokken will work with City staff to set up an EPIMS account for the City and Dokken will take the lead on submitting the application through EPIMS. Dokken will review the draft permit prior to City signature to ensure permit conditions to not cause constructability issues.
110 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 200, Folsom, CA 95630 ▪ Tele: 916 858-0642 ▪ Fax: 916 858-0643 ▪ www.dokkenengineering.com Task 3: Clean Water Act §401 Water Quality Certification Dokken will prepare a Water Quality Certification application package for submittal to the RWQCB.
Dokken will follow up with RWQCB staff following submittal of the application package periodically to ensure timely review of application materials. Dokken will review the draft permit prior to City signature to ensure permit conditions to not cause constructability issues.
Task 4: Clean Water Act §404 Nationwide Permit Authorization (OPTIONAL) The proposed projects appear to be consistent with Nationwide Permit 25 – Structure Discharges. Use of this Nationwide Permit does not require submitting a Pre-Construction Notification to the Army Corps of Engineers if all General and Regional Conditions specified in this Nationwide Permit are met. Based on a review of the project plans and the Nationwide Permit conditions, these projects are anticipated to qualify for coverage under a non-notifying NWP-25.
If during pre-application agency coordination, USACE determines that Pre-Construction Notification is required, this optional task will include preparation of a PCN, coordination with USACE, and review of the draft permit prior to City signature.
Fee For Services
The total cost for each scope item listed above is included below. This fee estimate assumes Yuba City will be responsible for paying application fees required by the regulatory agencies. A breakdown of the hours needed to complete each task is included on the following page.
Task 1: Pre-Application Agency Coordination - $2,560
Task 2: CDFW §1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement - $8,420 Task 3: CWA §401 Water Quality Certification - $8,020
Task 4: CWA §404 Nationwide Permit (OPTIONAL) - $9,290
Please feel free to contact me at [email protected] or by phone at (916) 858-0642 if you need anything else for your review of this project.
Thank you,
Scott Salembier
Associate Environmental Planner/Biologist
ISA Certified Arborist
Dokken Engineering
110 Blue Ravine Rd. #200
Folsom, CA 95630
Environmental Manager
Senior Environmental
Planner / Biologist /
Archaeologist
Associate Environmental
Planner / Biologist /
Archaeologist
Environmental Planner /
Biologist / Archaeologist
$250 $180 $140 $110
Envvironmental Permitting Services 6 24 78 105 213 $28,290 Task 1: Pre-Application Agency Coordination 8 8 16 $2,560 Task 2: CDFW §1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement 2 4 20 40 66 $8,420 Task 3: CWA §401 Water Quality Certification 2 4 25 30 61 $8,020 Task 4: CWA §404 Nationwide Permit Authorization (OPTIONAL) 2 8 25 35 70 $9,290 TOTAL HOURS 6 24 78 105 213
TOTAL COST $1,500 $4,320 $10,920 $11,550 $28,290
COST PROPOSAL - HOURS BREAKDOWN BY TASK
GILSIZER SLOUGH TRASH CAPTURE &
NORTH DETENTION BASIN PROJECT
March 10, 2022
TASK DESCRIPTION TOTAL
HOURS
TOTAL
COST
OTHER
DIRECT
COST
West Yost 2022 Billing Rate Schedule
Attachment D
(Effective January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022)*
POSITIONS
ENGINEERING
Principal/Vice President $300
Engineer/Scientist/Geologist Manager I / II $285 / $297 Principal Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $257 / $272 Senior Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $230 / $241
Associate Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $198 / $211 Engineer/Scientist/Geologist I / II $158 / $184
Engineering Aide $92
Field Monitoring Services $85
Administrative I / II / III / IV $81 / $102 / $123 / $136
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
Engineering Tech Manager I / II $294 / $297
Principal Tech Specialist I / II $270 / $280
Senior Tech Specialist I / II $247 / $260
Senior GIS Analyst $224
GIS Analyst $212
Technical Specialist I / II / III / IV $158 / $181 / $204 / $227 Technical Analyst I / II $114 / $136
Technical Analyst Intern $91
Cross-Connection Control Specialist I / II / III / IV $117 / $128 / $144 / $160 CAD Manager $179
CAD Designer I / II $139 / $155
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Senior Construction Manager $288
Construction Manager I / II / III / IV $175 / $187 / $200 / $252 Resident Inspector (Prevailing Wage Groups 4 / 3 / 2 / 1) $153 / $171 / $189 / $197 Apprentice Inspector $139
CM Administrative I / II $75 / $100
Field Services $198
2022 Billing Rate Schedule
LABOR CHARGES
(DOLLARS PER HOUR)
■ Technology and Communication charges including general and CAD computer, software, telephone, routine in-house copies/prints, postage, miscellaneous supplies, and other incidental project expenses will be billed at 6% of West Yost labor. ■ Outside Services such as vendor reproductions, prints, shipping, and major West Yost reproduction efforts, as well as Engineering Supplies, etc. will be billed at actual cost plus 15%. ■ The Federal Mileage Rate will be used for mileage charges and will be based on the Federal Mileage Rate applicable to when the mileage costs were incurred. Travel other than mileage will be billed at cost. ■ Subconsultants will be billed at actual cost plus 10%. ■ Expert witness, research, technical review, analysis, preparation and meetings billed at 150% of standard hourly rates. Expert witness testimony and depositions billed at 200% of standard hourly rates. ■ A Finance Charge of 1.5% per month (an Annual Rate of 18%) on the unpaid balance will be added to invoice amounts if not paid within 45 days from the date of the invoice. * This schedule is updated annually Page 1 of 2
(Effective January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022)*
Equipment Charges
EQUIPMENT
2" Purge Pump & Control Box $270 / day
Aquacalc / Pygmy or AA Flow Meter $28 / day
Emergency SCADA System $35 / day
Gas Detector $80 / day
Generator $39 / day
Hydrant Pressure Gauge $10 / day
Hydrant Pressure Recorder, Impulse (Transient) $55 / day Hydrant Pressure Recorder, Standard $40 / day
Low Flow Pump Controller $75 / day
Powers Water Level Meter $32 / day
Precision Water Level Meter $19 / day
Stainless Steel Wire per foot $0.03 / day
Storage Tank $15 / day
Sump Pump $24 / day
Transducer Components (per installation) $23 / day
Trimble GPS – Geo 7x $220 / day
Tube Length Counter $22 / day
Turbidity Meter $22 / day
Vehicle $10 / day
Water Flow Probe Meter $20 / day
Water Quality Meter $27 / day
Water Quality Multimeter $185 / day
Well Sounder $30 / day
BILLING RATES
2022 Billing Rate Schedule
* This schedule is updated annually Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item 8
CITY OF YUBA CITY
STAFF REPORT
Date: February 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Development Services Department
Presentation By: Doug Libby, Deputy Director of Development Services Summary
Subject: Authorization to submit Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) Grant Applications for Illegal Disposal Site Abatement Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yuba City authorizing the Public Works and Development Services Director, or designee, to submit and administer CalRecycle grant applications and projects for a period of five years on behalf of the City
Fiscal Impact: None. There is not a fiscal impact to submit this grant application.
Purpose:
To obtain State grant funding to further the City’s efforts to clean up illegal dumping where there is a high threat to public safety, health, and the environment and to authorize the Public Works and Development Services Director to be able to submit and administer CalRecycle grants for a period of 5 years.
Council’s Strategic Goal:
This item implements the Council’s goals of Public Safety, Fiscal Responsibility and Business Friendly.
Background:
The Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) has an Illegal Disposal Site Abatement Grant Program pursuant to section 48020 of the Public Resources Code. The purpose of the grant is to provide funding for the clean-up of solid waste sites and solid waste at co-disposal sites where the responsible party either cannot be identified or is unwilling or unable to pay for timely remediation and where cleanup is needed to protect public health and safety and/or the environment.
There is $1 million in total funds available and there is no match requirement.
Analysis:
CalRecycle Illegal Disposal Site Abatement provides funds to clean up high priority locations within the City to advance the efforts to keep Yuba City’s illegal dumping at bay. The scope of the current grant application includes two priority locations, with optional "hot spot" locations:
1. City owned land located on the east side of the Feather River, southeast of the city limits that is developed with City wastewater ponds; and
2. Unused Union Pacific Railroad corridor land located between Harter Parkway on the west and Bridge Street on the east.
3. Various “hot spot” locations
The submittal date for the current application is February 15, 2023. This is the second application filing period for funds. The due date for a City adopted Resolution is March 15, 2023. Grant awards will be announced in April, and the grant term is from the date of Notice to Proceed until June 30, 2025. The City anticipates requesting up to $300,000 for the two clean-up sites.
If funding is not received during this cycle, another potential funding round is anticipated in November 2023.
Additionally, the proposed resolution authorizes the Public Works and Development Services Director or designee, the ability to execute all CalRecycle grant documents including applications, agreements, amendments, and requests for payment, necessary to secure grant funds and implement approved grant projects for a period of 5-years from the date of the proposed resolution, or February 7, 2028.
Fiscal Impact:
There is not a matching fund requirement with the proposed grant. Minor costs associated with preparing the grant application will be funded through existing monies in Development Services, Professional Services budget (1910-62701).
Alternatives:
Do not adopt the proposed resolution to submit the proposed CalRecycle grant application and to not authorize the Development Services Director, or designee, the ability to submit and administer CalRecycle grants for a period of 5 years. The City Council may modify the proposal as determined necessary. If the City does not pursue these grant funds, the City will not receive State funding through the program, and will need to utilize other funding sources or wait for the next cycle to apply (November 2023).
Recommendations:
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yuba City authorizing the Public Works and Development Services Director, or designee, to submit and administer CalRecycle grant applications and projects for a period of five years on behalf of the City.
Attachments:
1. Proposed Resolution
Prepared By: Submitted By:
Doug Libby, AICP
Deputy Director of Development Services
Diana Langley
City Manager
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUBA CITY
AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION(S) FOR ALL CALRECYCLE GRANTS FOR
WHICH THE CITY OF YUBA CITY IS ELIGIBLE
WHEREAS, Public Resources Code sections 48000 et seq. authorize the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to administer various grant programs (grants) in furtherance of the State of California’s (state) efforts to reduce, recycle and reuse solid waste generated in the state thereby preserving landfill capacity and protecting public health and safety and the environment; and
WHEREAS, in furtherance of this authority CalRecycle is required to establish procedures governing the application, awarding, and management of the grants; and WHEREAS, CalRecycle grant application procedures require, among other things, an applicant’s governing body to declare by resolution certain authorizations related to the administration of CalRecycle grants.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Yuba City authorizes the submittal of application(s) to CalRecycle for all grants for which the City of Yuba City is eligible.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Public Works and Development Services Director or designee is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Yuba City all grant documents, including but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, and requests for payment, necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these authorizations are effective for five (5) years from the date of adoption of this resolution.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Yuba City at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of February, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Wade Kirchner, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ciara Wakefield, City Clerk Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Shannon L. Chaffin, City Attorney
Agenda Item 9
CITY OF YUBA CITY
STAFF REPORT
Date: February 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Development Services Department
Presentation By: Doug Libby, Deputy Director of Development Services Summary
Subject: Request to establish Planned Development (PD) 15 and approval of a Development Agreement for the Chima Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map SM 22-07
Recommendation: A. Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yuba City approving Planned Development (PD) No. 15 for the Chima Ranch Subdivision (SM 22-07) located in the southwest portion of the City along the west side of Sanbon Road and immediately west of the intersection of Pebble Beach Drive and Sanborn Road (Assessor’s Parcels 65-020-009 and 65-020-010) and an associated Mitigated Negative Declaration, by title only and waive the second reading B. Adopt an Uncodified Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yuba City approving a development agreement for the Chima Ranch Subdivision Map (SM 22-07) between the City of Yuba City and Interwest Homes Corporation, a California corporation, to develop 82 single-family lots on 14.86 acres located in the southwest portion of the City along the west side of Sanborn Road immediately west of the intersection of Pebble Beach Drive and Sanborn Road, Assessor’s Parcels 65-020-009 and 65-020-010, by title only and waive the second reading
Fiscal Impact: The cost for processing land use entitlements is funded by the project applicant through the payment of application fees.
Purpose:
To establish Planned Development (PD) 15 associated with the Chima Ranch Subdivision Map (SM 22- 07) and consideration to approve a development agreement.
Council’s Strategic Goal:
This item meets the City Council’s strategic goal of business friendly. Establishing PD 15 provides modified development standards to facilitate the build-out of a portion of the Chima Ranch Subdivision, SM 22-07.
Background:
This item was introduced at the January 17, 2023, regular Council Meeting.
The applicant, Interwest Homes Corporation, filed applications Planned Development (PD) 15 and Tentative Subdivision Map SM 22-07, Chima Ranch, and has requested a Development Agreement.
On December 14, 2022, the Yuba City Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, where no persons spoke in opposition to the project, and the Planning Commission unanimously:
1. Adopted Resolution PC 22-11 recommending approval of Planned Development (PD) 15 to the City Council together with Environmental Assessment 22-14; and
2. Adopted Resolution PC 22-12 contingently approving SM 22-07; and
3. Adopted Resolution PC 22-13 recommending approval of a Development Agreement associated with the Chima Ranch Subdivision Map (SM 22-07).
Analysis:
The project site is General Planned Low Density Residential and Low-Medium Density Residential. The property is zoned One-Family Residence (R-1) District and Two-Family Residence (R-2) District.
Subdivision Map SM 22-07, which was contingently approved by the Planning Commission, will divide
14.86 acres into 82 single-family residential lots having an overall residential density of 6.04 residences per gross acre. On that portion of the project located north of the extension of Pebble Beach Drive, the density will be 6.3 residences per gross acre and it will be 5.75 residences per gross acre on that portion of the project located south of the extension of Pebble Beach Drive. Two proposed lots have been designed large enough to accommodate an accessory dwelling unit on each lot and these will be constructed at the time the primary dwelling is established.
A rezoning to add a Planned Development (PD) designation is included to modify certain development standards in the R-1 and R-2 District in an effort to increase project densities and provide for a more compact design. These include allowing for reduced minimum lot sizes of 4,400 square feet for corner lots. Additionally, minimum required lot widths, yard setbacks, garage setbacks and minimum required distances between buildings on the same lot are proposed to be reduced in order to accommodate a more compact project design. Additional detail is explained below in the analysis section of this staff report.
The 14.86-acre property is level. Existing onsite uses include a walnut orchard, a caretaker manufactured home and a single-family dwelling unit together with existing well(s) and onsite septic and leach field systems.
Table 1: Bordering Uses
North: Single-family residences and orchards
South: Orchards and approved West Sanborn Subdivision, SM 19-02 (95 lots) East: Low Density Single-Family Residential
West: A Single-family residence and orchards within the incorporated limit of Yuba City This subdivision will be provided full range of City services with stormwater runoff being collected into the City’s drainage system and conveyed to the Gilsizer Slough. This property was previously annexed to the Gilsizer District.
Compatibility with Neighboring Uses:
This project is within a long planned residential area of the City, with existing homes being developed east of the project site. Proposed residential densities are consistent with what was analyzed in both the City’s 2004 Comprehensive General Plan Update and its accompanying Environmental Impact Report (EIR) together with the now rescinded Lincoln East Specific Plan and its accompanying EIR.
Accordingly, this project is compatible and consistent with existing and future planned uses. This project is an implementation of those two previous planning processes that were recommended for approval by previous Planning Commissions and adopted by previous City Councils.
Zoning Compliance:
This project is subject to the City’s R-1 (Single Family Residential) and R-2 (Two-Family Residence) District development standards or as may be amended by the proposed Planned Development (PD) District. The proposed PD will modify certain R-1 and R-2 District development standards in an effort to increase project densities in that portion of the project north of Pebble Beach Drive.
These include:
• Allow reduced minimum lot sizes to 4,400 sq. ft. for corner lots where 4,500 sq. ft. is ordinarily required.
• Allow reduced minimum lot widths of 40 feet for interior lots and 44 feet for corner lots where 50- 60-foot widths are ordinarily required.
• Allow increased maximum percent lot coverage of 60 percent for lots having 1-story homes and 40 percent maximum lot coverage for lots having 2-story homes where 40-45 percent thresholds are ordinarily required.
• Allow reduced garage front and street side yard setbacks to 18.5 feet where 20 feet is ordinarily required.
• Provide for reduced rear yard setbacks of 10 feet for lots less than 5,500 sq. ft. in size and 15 feet for lots that are equal to or greater than 5,500 sq. ft. in size where 25 feet is ordinarily required.
Traffic:
Local streets impacted by this project include Sanborn, Pebble Beach, Lincoln and Bogue Roads which currently operate within all safety and City level of service standards. The addition of 82 proposed residential lots, previously planned under the now rescinded Lincoln East Specific Plan, is not expected to adversely change traffic and circulation conditions. The developer will be required to complete a number of roadway improvements consistent with City standards and pay City traffic impact fees.
Additionally, the developer will be required to pay a fair-share of costs for the future signalization of the intersections of Sanborn and Lincoln Road as well as the intersection of Sanborn Road and Bogue Road. Estimated daily vehicle trips from the project is approximately 820 at build-out, which can be
accommodated by planned roadway improvements of the project and the existing local street system.
Finally, through Transportation/Traffic Mitigation 1, the developer is required to contribute a fair-share to the development of a sheltered bus stop on the west side of Sanborn Road as it nears Bogue Road and on the north side of Bogue Road just west of the intersection with Sanborn Road. This improvement was also required of the West Sanborn Estates Subdivision (SM 19-02) that was approved on November 10, 2021.
Through the Conditions of Approval requiring improvements to Sanborn Road and paying fair-share contributions toward future road improvements at the intersections of Lincoln and Sanborn Road as well as Bogue and Sanborn Road, together helping fund a new public transit bus stop, traffic impacts associated with the project are anticipated to be less than significant.
Development Agreement:
A development agreement (DA) is proposed to accompany this subdivision. A development agreement is a binding agreement between the City and developer spelling out items that go beyond standard planning, zoning, development and design standards. While development agreements are allowed by State law (Government Code Sections 65864 – 65869.5), there are no established rules or policies regarding required deal points other than the agreement specify a duration, the density and intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and the provision for reservation or dedication of lands for public purposes. As a result, each agreement is unique and must be considered on its own terms.
In this case, the DA was requested by the applicant. The primary deal point for this DA (Section 2.2) is to extend the life of the subdivision to 10-years and may be extended further by mutual consent of both parties.
The second primary deal point (Section 4.2.5) is to require the developer to pay the City an interim neighborhood park fee in the amount of $3,206 per single-family residential unit prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each lot developed. This fee is in addition to the City’s existing Park and Recreation development impact fee because neighborhood parks are not currently included in the existing fee; however, the land uses in this area (former Lincoln East Specific Plan) include land use allocations for neighborhood parks. Including this provision provides an interim mechanism to collect an appropriate fee for neighborhood parks until such time as the adopts a comprehensive development impact fee update that incorporates a neighborhood park component. A provision is included to increase the fee due to inflation (Engineering News and Record Construction Index).
Environmental Considerations:
An environmental assessment was prepared for this project in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Guidelines. This process included the distribution of requests for comment from other responsible or affected agencies and interested organizations. In accordance with CEQA requirements, the Environmental Assessment was advertised in the Appeal Democrat for a 20-day public review period beginning on November 24, 2022 and ending on December 14, 2022. Additionally, individual notices were mailed to all property owners within 350-feet of the project site.
Based upon the attached environmental assessment and the list of identified mitigation measures, staff has determined that there is no evidence in the record that the proposed project will have a significant effect on the environment and recommends adoption of a mitigated negative declaration for this project.
The findings of the mitigated negative declaration are that, with the proposed mitigations for Cultural Resources, Geology /Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology/Water Quality, Noise,