Yuba City City Council
November 7, 2023

92 3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Table 3.21: Mandatory Findings of Significance
Would the Project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, substantially reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
example of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
X
b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects
of a project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)
X
c) Have environmental effects, which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X

3.21.1 Impact Assessment/Environmental Consequences:
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important example of the major periods of California history or prehistory? The land was stripped many years ago of native vegetation for agricultural uses. Therefore, with the proposed mitigation measure for raptors that may be nesting on the property, the construction of this subdivision will not significantly degrade the quality of the natural environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate an important example of the major periods of California history or prehistory.

The analysis conducted in this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration results in a determination that the proposed Project, with its mitigation measures, will have a less than significant effect on the local environment.

93 b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(i) states that a Lead Agency shall consider whether the cumulative impact of a project is significant and whether the effects of the project are cumulatively considerable. The assessment of the significance of the cumulative effects of a project must, therefore, be conducted in connection with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable future projects.

This Project is consistent with the residential densities and policies of the General Plan. As such the traffic generated by the Project is within what was anticipated in the General Plan which considered anticipated future growth of the area. The City has adequate water and wastewater capacity and the Project will be extending those services to the site. Stormwater drainage will also meet all City standards. The City has good development and design standards that will be applied to the subdivision. The loss of agricultural land is cumulative but based on City and County agricultural protection program, the loss is limited to within the urban areas of the cities which is a minor portion of the entire County. The school district has not indicated that they lack capacity to provide proper educational facilities to the new students. The FRAQMD also did not comment that the project would create any significant cumulative impacts on air quality. Therefore, there are no significant impacts that will be individually limited but cumulatively considerable.
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
The proposed Project in and of itself would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Construction-related air quality, noise, and hazardous materials exposure impacts would occur for a very short period and only be a minor impact during that time period. Therefore, the proposed Project would not have any direct or indirect significant adverse impacts on humans.

94 4. Section References and/or Incorporated by Reference According to Section 15150 of the CEQA Guidelines, an ND may incorporate by reference all or portions of another document that is a matter of public record. The incorporated language will be considered to be set forth in full as part of the text of the ND. All documents incorporated by reference are available for review at, or can be obtained through, the City of Yuba City Development Services Department located at the address provided above. The following documents are incorporated by reference:

MHM Engineering, July 12, 2023, Focused Traffic Impact analysis for Sohal Ranch Subdivision, LESA Mitigation Review.

PBSJ for the City of Yuba City, March 2009, Environmental Impact Report for the Lincoln East specific Plan.

Fehr & Peers, Inc. September 2020. SB 743 Implementation Guidelines for City of Yuba City.

Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, November 2017. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA.

Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Hex Maps. Work VMT-2020 MTP/SCS (Adopted).

California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection (CDC DLRP). 2014. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program – Sutter County Important Farmland 2012. August 2014.

California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection (CDC DLRP). 2013. Sutter County Williamson Act FY 2013/2014.

Carollo. 2011. City of Yuba City 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2011.

Yuba City, City of. 2016. City of Yuba City Municipal Code. https://www.municode.com/library/ca/yuba_city/codes/code_of_ordinances Dyett & Bhatia. 2004. City of Yuba City General Plan. Adopted April 8, 2004.

Yuba City General Plan, 2004 Environmental Impact Report. (SCH #2001072105).

Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. 1995. Yuba-Sutter Bikeway Master Plan. December 1995. “Determination of 1-in-200 Year Floodplain for Yuba City Urban Level of Flood Protection Determination,” prepared for Yuba City by MBK Engineers, November 2015.

Sutter County General Plan.

Feather River Air Quality Management District (FRAQMD) CEQA Significance Thresholds.

Yuba Sutter Transit Route Map.

95 California Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey. “Fault Zone Activity Map.” AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zones.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2016. EnviroStor. Available at http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/
California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program – Sutter County Important Farmland Map.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Flood Insurance Rate Maps.

Carollo. 2011. City of Yuba City 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2011.

City of Yuba City Wastewater Master Plan.

Sutter County Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan, April 1994.

Yuba County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, Sept. 2010.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2011. California Scenic Highway Mapping System website. Updated September 7, 2011. Available at
http://dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/index.htm

96 Appendix A

MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING PLAN

SOHAL RANCH SUBDIVISION
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration EA 22-06 For Tentative Subdivision Map 22-02 and
a Development Agreement

97 City of Yuba City

MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING PLAN
Sohal Ranch Subdivision:

Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration EA 22-06 For Tentative Subdivision Map 22-02 and a Development Agreement Impact Mitigation Measure Responsible
Party
Monitoring
Party Timing

3.3 Air Quality Air Quality Mitigation Measure 1: The development shall use the following Best Management Practices
(BMPs) to reduce the impact from off-road diesel
equipment include:
• Install diesel particulate filters or implement
other ARB-verifies diesel emission control
strategies on all construction equipment to
further reduce diesel PM emissions beyond
the 45% reduction required by the Districts
Best Available Mitigation Measure for
Construction Phase;
• Use equipment during times when receptors
are not present (e.g., when school is not in
session or during non-school hours; or when
office buildings are unoccupied);
• Establish staging areas for the construction
equipment that are as distant as possible
from off-site receptors;
• Establish an electricity supply to the
construction site and use electric powered
equipment instead of diesel-powered
equipment or generators, where feasible;
• Use haul trucks with on-road engines instead
of off-road engines even for on-site hauling;
• Equip nearby buildings with High Efficiency
Particle Arresting (HEPA) filter systems at all
mechanical air intake points to the building
to reduce the levels of diesel PM that enter
the buildings; and/or,
• Temporarily relocate receptors during
construction.

Developer Development
Services
Dept.

During the
construction
phase.

3.4 Biological
Resources
Biological Resource Mitigation Measure 1: Preconstruction Nesting Surveys: Pre-construction surveys for nesting raptors should be conducted on
trees within the subject property if construction
activities occur between March 1 and September 15
Developer Development
Services
Dept.

Prior to the
construction
phase

98 pursuant to California Department of Fish & Wildlife requirements. These surveys should be
accomplished no later than 7 days prior to
commencement of tree removals and grading
activities. If nesting raptors are discovered, the
Project biologist shall identify and implement
appropriate mitigation, subject to City review and
approval, to ensure protection of the raptors prior to
any tree removals.

3.7 Geology and
Soils
Paleontological Mitigation Measure 1: This
Mitigation Measure shall be placed as a note on the
Demolition and Grading Plans. If paleontological
resources are found, the construction manager shall
halt all activity and immediately contact the
Development Services Department at 530-822-4700.

Mitigation shall be conducted as follows:

1. Identify and evaluate paleontological
resources by intense field survey where
impacts are considered high;

2. Assess effects on identified sites;

3. Consult with the institutional/academic
paleontologists conducting research
investigations within the geological
formations that are slated to be impacted;

4. Obtain comments from the researchers;

5. Comply with researchers’ recommendations
to address any significant adverse effects
were determined by the City to be feasible.

In considering any suggested mitigation proposed by
the consulting paleontologist, the City’s Community
Development Department Staff shall determine
whether avoidance is necessary and feasible in light
of factors such as the nature of the find, project
design, costs, Specific or General Plan policies and
land use assumptions, and other considerations. If
avoidance is unnecessary or infeasible, other
appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) shall be
instituted. Work may proceed on other parts of the
project site while mitigation for paleontological
resources is carried out.

Developer Development
Services Dept
During
construction
phase

99 3.8. Greenhouse
Gases
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation 1: Pertaining to
potential cumulative impacts associated with GHG
emissions, site grading process shall comply with the
GHG Reduction Measures provided in the adopted
Yuba City Resource Efficiency Plan.

Developer Development
Services
Dept.

Prior to
issuance of
building
permits.

3.13. Noise Noise Mitigation Measure 1: The project
contractor(s) shall ensure that the following
measures are implemented during all phases of
project construction:
a) Whenever construction occurs on parcels
less than 50-feet from residential buildings
where people normally sleep, schools or
other sensitive uses, when it occurs during
later project stages on parcels near
residential and other noise-sensitive uses
built on-site during earlier project stages,
temporary barriers shall be constructed
around the construction sites to shield the
ground floor and lower stories of the noisesensitive uses. These barriers shall be of ¾- inch Medium Density Overlay (MDO)
plywood sheeting, or other material of
equivalent utility and appearance, and shall
achieve a Sound Transmission Class of STC30, or greater, based on certified sound transmission loss data taken according to
ASTM Test Method E90. The barrier shall not
contain any gaps at its base or face, except
for site access and surveying openings. The
barrier height shall be designed to break the
line-of-sight and provide at least a 5-dBA
insertion loss between the noise producing
equipment and the upper-most story of the
adjacent noise-sensitive uses. If, for practical
reasons, which are subject to the review and
approval of the City, a barrier cannot be built
to provide noise relief to the upper stories of
nearby noise-sensitive uses, then it must be
built to the tallest feasible height.
b) Construction equipment staging areas shall
be located as far as possible from residential
areas while still serving the needs of
construction contractor(s).
c) High noise activities, such as jackhammers,
drills, impact wrenches and other generators
Developer Development
Services
Dept.

During
construction
phase

100
of sporadic high noise peaks, shall be
restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00
p.m. Monday through Friday, unless it can be
proved to the satisfaction of the City that the
allowance of work outside these hours and
dates would not adversely affect nearby
noise-sensitive receptors.
d) Construction equipment shall be properly
muffled and maintained with noise reduction
devices to minimize construction-generated
noise.
e) The unnecessary idling of internal
combustion engines shall be prohibited.
f) Residents and businesses within 300 feet of
the construction site shall be notified of the
construction scheduling in writing.
g) The construction contractor shall designate a
“noise disturbance coordinator” for
construction activities. The coordinator shall
be responsible for responding to any local
complaints regarding construction noise. The
coordinator shall determine the cause of the
noise complaint (i.e., starting too early, bad
muffler, no shielding), and would require that
reasonable measures warranted to correct
the problem be implemented. A telephone
number for the construction coordinator
shall be posted at the construction site and
be included in the notice sent to neighbors
and businesses regarding the construction
schedule.

Noise Mitigation Measure 2: The project
applicant shall require that all construction contracts include specifications that construction equipment
remain a minimum of 20 feet from residential
buildings or other buildings where people normally
sleep.

3.16. Recreation Recreation Mitigation Measure 1: Development of the neighborhood park shall be consistent with the
approved Development Agreement.

Developer Public Works
Dept.

Prior to
issuance of
building
permits.

101

3.17. Transportation
and Traffic
Traffic Mitigation Measure 1: The project
applicant(s) shall contribute its fair share of the cost to provide public transit service and additional parkand-ride space for the plan area as determined by the City of Yuba City through participation in a benefit or assessment district or through a separate agreement
between the applicant(s), the City of Yuba City, and
Yuba-Sutter Transit. At a minimum, service is
expected to include the following components.
• Fixed-route bus service connecting the
plan area to existing Yuba-Sutter Transit
service with a minimum of hourly
headways during normal operating hours.
• Demand-responsive service meeting ADA
paratransit requirements in the plan area.
• Expansion of peak period (AM and PM)
weekday commuter bus service to
downtown Sacramento.
• Expansion of park-and-ride space.

Costs shall include the capital costs of transit vehicles and facilities as well as the operating and
maintenance cost of the service beyond what would
be paid for through the transportation development
act (TDA) funding.

Costs shall include the capital costs of transit vehicles and facilities as well as the operating and
maintenance cost of the service beyond what would
be paid for through the transportation development
act (TDA) funding.

Traffic Mitigation Measure 2: For Bogue
Road/Sanborn Road - until this intersection is added
to the City’s Traffic Impact Fee Study Program, the
project applicant(s) shall pay a fair-share to install a traffic signal at the Bogue Road/Sanborn Road
intersection. If it is added to the City’s Fee Study
Program the project applicant(s) shall be responsible
for complying with the Fee Study Program.

Traffic Mitigation Measure 3: Lincoln Road Sanborn
Road, until this intersection is added to the City’s
Traffic Impact Fee Study Program the project
applicant shall pay a fair share to install a traffic signal and construct one left-turn lane and one shared
Developer,
Public Works
Dept.

Public Works
Dept.

Prior to
recordation
of the
subdivision
map

102
through/right-turn lane on all approaches at the
Lincoln Road/Sanborn Road intersection.

3.18. Tribal Cultural
Resources
Tribal Cultural Resources Mitigation 1: Worker
Awareness Training. The developer shall ensure that
a Worker Education Program is developed and
delivered to train equipment operators about
cultural resources and training shall be documented.

The program shall be designed to inform workers
about: federal and state regulations pertaining to
cultural resources and tribal cultural resources; the
subsurface indicators of resources that shall require a work stoppage; procedures for notifying the City of
any occurrences; and enforcement of penalties and
repercussions for non-compliance with the program.

Worker education training may be provided either in
person or as a DVD with a training binder, prepared
by a qualified professional archaeologist and
reviewed by the City. The United Auburn Indian
Community (UAIC) shall be afforded the option of
attending the initial training in person or providing a video segment or information for incorporation into
the training that appeals to the contractor's need to
be respectful of tribal cultural resources and tribal
participation in implementing unanticipated
discovery protocols. All ground-disturbing equipment
operators shall be required to receive the training
and sign a form that acknowledges receipt of the
training. A copy of the form shall be provided to the
City as proof of compliance.

Tribal Cultural Resources Mitigation 2: Avoid and
minimize impacts to previously unknown Tribal
Cultural Resources. If any cultural resources, such as
structural features, unusual amounts of bone or shell,
artifacts, human remains, or architectural remains
are encountered during the initial inspection or
during any subsequent construction activities, work
shall be suspended within 100 feet of the find, and
the construction supervisor shall immediately notify
the City representative. If the find includes human
remains, then the City shall immediately notify the
Sutter County Coroner and the procedures in Section
7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and,
if applicable, Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources
Code, shall be followed. For resources reasonably
associated with Native American cultural and for
human remains, the City shall coordinate any
Developer Development
Services
Dept.

During
construction
phase

103
necessary investigation of the discovery with a UAIC
tribal representative and a qualified archaeologist
approved by the City. As part of the site investigation and resource assessment, the City shall consult with
UAIC to develop, document, and implement
appropriate management recommendations, should
potential impacts to the resources be found by the
City to be significant. Nothing in this measure
prohibits the City from considering any comments
from other culturally-affiliated Native American
tribes that volunteer information to the City during its investigation. Possible management
recommendations could include documentation,
data recovery, or (if deemed feasible by the City)
preservation in place. The contractor shall implement
any measures deemed by City staff to be necessary
and feasible to avoid, minimize, or mitigate
significant effects to the cultural resources, such as
the use of a Native American Monitor whenever work
is occurring within 100 feet of the discovery of Native American resources, if deemed appropriate by the
City.

The types of treatment preferred by UAIC that
protects, preserves or restores the integrity of tribal cultural resources may include Tribal Monitoring, or
recovery of cultural objects, and reburial of cultural
objects or cultural soil that is done in a culturally
appropriate manner. Recommendations of the
treatment of tribal cultural resources will be
documented in the project record. For any
recommendations.

104
Appendix B

FOCUSED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

FOR SOHAL RANCH SUBDIVISION
Prepared by MHM Engineering
July 28, 2023

FOCUSED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

SOHAL RANCH SUBDIVISION

LESP MITIGATION REVIEW
Prepared by:

MHM Incorporated
1204 E Street, P.O. Box B
Marysville, California 95901
July 28, 2023

ii | Page

FOCUSED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

FOR SOHAL RANCH SUBDIVISION
Yuba City, CA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 EXISTING SETTING ..................................................................................................................... 7 Study Area .............................................................................................................................. 7 Level of Service ..................................................................................................................... 7 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................ 10 Project Description ............................................................................................................... 10 CONCULSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 11 APPENDIX ..................................................................................................................................... 18

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 3 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions

FOCUSED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

FOR SOHAL RANCH SUBDIVISION
Yuba City, CA

INTRODUCTION
This report summarizes MHM Incorporated analysis of the potential traffic related mitigation measures within the Lincoln East Specific Plan (LESP) Project EIR and CEQA requirements for the impacts and traffic operational effects associated with the Sohal Ranch Subdivision in Yuba City, California. The Sohal Ranch Subdivision is located in southwest Yuba City at the southeast corner of South George Washington Boulevard and Lincoln Road. Figure 1 presents the site relative to the vicinity and the proposed tentative map is shown in Figure 2.

Project Description. Sohal Ranch will occupy roughly 40 acres located in the southeast corner of South George Washington Boulevard and Lincoln Road. The project proposes 179 single family residential lots and a neighborhood park of 2.63 net acres. Access to the local circulation system is planned at two intersections, one onto Lincoln Road and one onto South George Washington Boulevard. In the future, there will be an access to Harter Parkway. The project was part of the Lincoln East Specific Plan which was rescinded by the City Council.

The land use and circulation plan developed in the LESP is still part of the City zoning and General Plan maps.

Analysis Approach. The purpose of this focused analysis is to review mitigation measures from the LESP for some key intersections near the proposed Sohal Ranch Subdivision. The intersections and roadways reviewed are as follows:
1) Bogue Road/Sanborn Road – Review mitigation measure within the LESP and determine the CEQA requirements for the Sohal Ranch.
2) Franklin Road/Walton Avenue – Review mitigation measure within the LESP and determine the CEQA requirements for the Sohal Ranch.
3) Lincoln Road/Walton Avenue – Review mitigation measure within the LESP and determine the CEQA requirements for the Sohal Ranch.
4) Bogue Road/Walton Avenue – Review mitigation measure within the LESP and determine the CEQA requirements for the Sohal Ranch.
5) Franklin Road/George Washington Boulevard – Review mitigation measure within the LESP and determine the CEQA requirements for the Sohal Ranch. 6) Lincoln Road/George Washington Boulevard – Review mitigation measure within the LESP and determine the CEQA requirements for the Sohal Ranch. 7) Bogue Road/George Washington Boulevard – Review mitigation measure within the LESP and

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 4 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions
determine the CEQA requirements for the Sohal Ranch.
8) Lincoln Road/Sanborn Road – Review mitigation measure within the LESP and determine the CEQA requirements for the Sohal Ranch.
9) Lincoln Road/SR 99 – Review mitigation measure within the LESP and determine the CEQA requirements for the Sohal Ranch.
10) Lincoln Road/Harter Parkway – Review mitigation measure within the LESP and determine the CEQA requirements for the Sohal Ranch.

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 5 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions
Figure No. 1 - Location Map

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 6 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions
Figure No. 2 – Tentative Map

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 7 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions

EXISTING SETTING
Study Area
This focused review of LESP mitigation measures at ten (10) existing intersections within the area that may be affected by the proposed project. The limits of the study area were identified through discussions with Yuba City staff based on their knowledge of the community and the results of previous traffic studies conducted for development in Yuba City.

Level of Service
Level of Service. To quantitatively evaluate traffic conditions and to provide a basis for comparison of operating conditions with and without project generated traffic, Levels of Service were determined at study area intersections from previous traffic studies. “Level of Service” (LOS) is a quantitative measure of traffic operating conditions whereby a letter grade “A” through “F” is assigned to an intersection. LOS “A” through “F” represents progressively worsening traffic conditions. The characteristics associated with the various LOS for intersections are presented in Table 1. The City of Yuba City General Plan has established LOS “D” measured over the peak hour as the minimum standard for City streets, with specific exceptions identified where conditions in excess of the LOS D standard will be acceptable.

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 8 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions
TABLE NO. 1

LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS
Level of
Service Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection Roadway (Daily) “A” Uncongested operations, all queues
clear in a single-signal cycle.

Delay < 10.0 sec
Little or no delay.

Delay < 10 sec/veh
Completely free flow.
“B” Uncongested operations, all queues
clear in a single cycle.

Delay > 10.0 sec and < 20.0 sec
Short traffic delays.

Delay > 10 sec/veh and
< 15 sec/veh
Free flow, presence of other
vehicles noticeable.
“C” Light congestion, occasional backups
on critical approaches.

Delay > 20.0 sec and < 35.0 sec
Average traffic delays.

Delay > 15 sec/veh and
< 25 sec/veh
Ability to maneuver and
select operating speed
affected.
“D” Significant congestions of critical
approaches but intersection
functional. Cars required to wait
through more than one cycle during
short peaks. No long queues formed.

Delay > 35.0 sec and < 55.0 sec
Long traffic delays.

Delay > 25 sec/veh and
< 35 sec/veh
Unstable flow, speeds and
ability to maneuver
restricted.
“E” Severe congestion with some longstanding queues on critical approaches. Blockage of intersection
may occur if traffic signal does not
provide for protected turning
movements. Traffic queue may block
nearby intersection(s) upstream of
critical approach(es).

Delay > 55.0 sec and < 80.0 sec
Very long traffic delays, failure,
extreme congestion.

Delay > 35 sec/veh and
< 50 sec/veh
At or near capacity, flow
quite unstable.
“F” Total breakdown, stop-and-go
operation. Delay > 80.0 sec
Intersection blocked by external
causes. Delay > 50 sec/veh
Forced flow, breakdown.

Sources: Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition.

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 9 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions
Levels of Service obtained from previous studies including the LESP study and the most recent Citywide traffic study are shown in Table 2 and Table 3.

TABLE NO. 2

EXISTING INTERSECTION AM PEAK HOUR OPERATIONS LEVELS OF SERVICES Existing Conditions Cumulative Market Conditions
Location Control Average
Delay
LOS Control Average
Delay
LOS
Bogue Road/Sanborn Road AWSC 9.0 A AWSC* 18.0 C
Walton Avenue/ Franklin Road Signalized 34.0 C Signalized 57.3 E S. Walton Avenue/ Lincoln Road Signalized 29.7 C Signalized 51.3 D S. Walton Avenue/ Bogue Road AWSC 11.5 B Signalized 11.4 B George Washington Boulevard/
Lincoln Road
AWSC 9.7 A Signalized 12.1 B
George Washington Boulevard/
Franklin Road
AWSC 14.2 B Signalized 6.5 A
George Washington Boulevard/
Bogue Road
AWSC 21.6 C Signalized 77.6 E
Lincoln Road/Sanborn Road AWSC 10.0 A Signalized* 30.0 C Lincoln Road/Harter Parkway Signalized 17.1 B
*Bogue Road/Sanborn Road and Lincoln Road/Sanborn Road are cumulative plus LESP TABLE NO. 3

EXISTING INTERSECTION PM PEAK HOUR OPERATIONS LEVELS OF SERVICES Existing Conditions Cumulative Market Conditions
Location Control Average
Delay
LOS Control Average
Delay
LOS
Bogue Road/Sanborn Road AWSC 9.0 A Signalized* 32.0 D
Walton Avenue/ Franklin Road Signalized 33.8 C Signalized 78.0 E S. Walton Avenue/ Lincoln Road Signalized 23.1 C Signalized 51.6 D S. Walton Avenue/ Bogue Road AWSC 11.6 B Signalized 37.9 D George Washington Boulevard/
Lincoln Road
AWSC 11.8 B AWSC 13.9 B
George Washington Boulevard/
Franklin Road
AWSC 15.2 C Signalized 6.9 A
George Washington Boulevard/
Bogue Road
AWSC 9.3 A AWSC 22.4 C
Lincoln Road/Sanborn Road AWSC 9.0 A Signalized* 25.0 C Lincoln Road/Harter Parkway Signalized 20.4 C
*Bogue Road/Sanborn Road and Lincoln Road/Sanborn Road are cumulative plus full LESP

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 10 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions

PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
Project Description
The text that follows describes the characteristics of the project in terms of automobile trip generation and distribution.

Trip Generation. The number of vehicle trips that are expected to be generated by development of the Sohal Ranch Subdivision can be estimated using typical trip generation rates for single family development. Applicable rates are published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. These rates are presented in Table 4, and as shown 167 trips in the evening p.m. peak hour.

TABLE 4

TRIP GENERATION RATES
Land Use Unit
Trip Per Unit
Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Single Family Residential Dwelling 9.43 25% 75% 0.70 63% 37% 0.94 Sohal Ranch 179 du 1,688 14 44 126 50 29 168
Trips may not equal due to rounding
Trip Distribution. The distribution of vehicle trips associated with the proposed development has been based on existing traffic patterns, the location of probable destinations including the locations of local schools. Table 5 presents the projected trip distribution percentages for the project’s new trips used for this analysis. Variation also occurs between current and long-term conditions, should Harter Parkway be constructed.

TABLE 5

TRIP DISTRIBUATION

ASSUMPTIONS
Direction Route Percent
Distribution
Trips
North Lincoln Road to SR 20 via Geo Wash Blvd. 27% 453
South Lincoln Road to Bogue Road via Geo Wash Blvd. 21% 353 East Geo Wash Blvd to SR 99 via Lincoln Road 43% 722
West Geo Wash Blvd to Township Road via Lincoln Rd 9% 151 Total 100% 1679

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 11 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
Following the review of the previous traffic studies in the Project Description and using the mitigation measures in the LESP, we have prepared Table 6 summarize the mitigation measures for the Sohal Ranch Subdivision Project. It should be noted that some of these improvements have been completed since the traffic study has been completed. Our developer still needs to pay fair share either through AB 1600 or reimbursement agreements.

TABLE NO. 6

PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
Impact Mitigation Measure Action Timing

4.12-1. Under Existing Plus
Full LESP Project
conditions, the LESP
could increase traffic
volumes at study
intersections in the
City of Yuba City.

Franklin Road/Harding Road
a) The project applicant(s) shall be
responsible to pay their fair-share
to widen Franklin Road from two
to four lanes (including continuous
bike lanes and sidewalks) from the
proposed Harter Parkway to
Walton Avenue (Franklin Road is
already four lanes between the
Walton Avenue and SR 99).

AND
b) The project applicant(s) shall be
responsible to pay fair share to
remove the stop signs on the
eastbound and westbound
approaches, prohibit northbound
and southbound through and leftturn movements, and construct the following approach lanes at the
Franklin Road/Harding Road
intersection concurrent with a
connection between Cherry
Street/Harding Road and the
LESP.
 Eastbound – an exclusive leftturn lane, two through lanes, and an exclusive right-turn
lane.
 Westbound – an exclusive
left-turn lane, one through
lane, and one shared
through/right-turn lane.
 Northbound and Southbound
– an exclusive right-turn lane.

Payment of required
fair share fee. This
widening is part of the
City AB1600 fee
program. Developer
shall be the traffic
impact fee.

Final Building
Permit

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 12 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions
TABLE NO. 6

PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
Impact Mitigation Measure Action Timing
Bogue Road/Sanborn Road
c) The project applicant shall be
responsible to pay fair share to
modify the Bogue Road/Sanborn
Road intersection. The
intersection improvements shall be
as follows:
 Eastbound, Northbound, and
Southbound - an exclusive
left-turn lane and one shared
through/right-turn lane.
 Westbound – one shared
through/left-turn lane and an
exclusive right-turn lane.

Payment of required
fair share fee. This
improvement is part of
the updated City
AB1600 fee program,
the project applicant(s)
shall pay a fair-share to
install a traffic signal
and intersection
improvements. If it is
added to the City’s Fee
Study Program the
project applicant(s)
shall be responsible for
complying with the Fee
Study Program.

Final Building
Permit

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 13 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions
TABLE NO. 6

PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
Impact Mitigation Measure Action Timing
Franklin Road/Walton Avenue
d) Implement Mitigation Measure

4.12-1(a); AND
e) The project applicant shall be
responsible to pay their fair-share
to widen Walton Avenue to four
lanes from south of Bridge Street
to Franklin Road (Walton Avenue
currently transitions from four to
two lanes south of Bridge Street).

The outside southbound throughlane should extend south of the Franklin Road/Walton Avenue
intersection a minimum of 600
feet before transitioning back to
one lane. The outside northbound
through-lane should begin at least
250 feet prior to Franklin Road;
AND
f) The project applicant(s) shall be
responsible to modify the traffic
signal and construct the following
approach lanes at the Franklin
Road/Walton Avenue
intersection.
 Eastbound and Westbound
two left-turn lanes, two
through lanes, and an
exclusive right-turn lane.
 Northbound and Southbound
– one left-turn lane, two
through lanes, and an
exclusive right-turn lane.

Payment of required
fair share fee. This
intersection is part of
the City AB1600 fee
program. Developer
shall pay the traffic
impact fee.

Payment of required
fair share fee. This
intersection is part of
the City AB1600 fee
program. Developer
shall pay the traffic
impact fee.

Final Building
Permit
Final Building
Permit
Lincoln Road/Walton Avenue
g) The project applicant shall be
responsible to widen Lincoln
Road to four lanes between
Walton Avenue and SR 99 (this
improvement does not include
widening Lincoln Road to four
lanes through the Lincoln
Road/SR 99 intersection). The
inside eastbound through lane is
recommended to be an exclusive
left-turn lane at SR 99. The
outside westbound through lane is
Payment of required
fair share fee. This
improvement is part of
the City AB1600 fee
program. Developer
shall pay the traffic
impact fee.

Final Building
Permit

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 14 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions
TABLE NO. 6

PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
Impact Mitigation Measure Action Timing
recommended to begin as the
receiving lane for a “free” rightturn lane from southbound SR 99 and should extend west of the
Lincoln Road/Walton Avenue
intersection a minimum of 600
feet before transitioning back to
one lane. The outside eastbound
through lane should begin at least
250 feet prior to Walton Avenue,
AND
h) The project applicant(s) shall be
responsible to modify the traffic
signal and construct the following
approach lanes at the Lincoln
Road/Walton Avenue
intersection.
 Eastbound and Westbound –
one left-turn lane, two
through lanes, and one rightturn lane.
 Northbound and Southbound
– one left-turn lane, one
through lane, and an
exclusive right-turn lane.

Payment of required
fair share fee. This
intersection is part of
the City AB1600 fee
program. Developer
shall pay the traffic
impact fee.

Final Building
Permit
Bogue Road/Walton Avenue
i) The project applicant shall be
responsible to install a traffic
signal and construct the following
approach lanes at the Bogue
Road/Walton Avenue
intersection.
 Eastbound, Northbound, and
Southbound – one left-turn
lane and one shared
through/right-turn lane.
 Westbound – one left-turn
lane, one through lane, and
an exclusive right-turn lane.

Payment of required
fair share fee. This
intersection is part of
the City AB1600 fee
program. Developer
shall pay the traffic
impact fee.

Final Building
Permit

4.12-3. Under Existing Plus
Full LESP Project
conditions, the LESP
could increase traffic
volumes at study
intersections in the
Sutter County.

Franklin Road/George Washington
Boulevard
a) The project applicant shall be
responsible to modify the
intersection to construct one leftturn lane and one shared through/right-turn lane on the
Payment of required
fair share fee. This
intersection is part of
the City AB1600 fee
program. Developer
Final Building
Permit

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 15 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions
TABLE NO. 6

PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
Impact Mitigation Measure Action Timing
eastbound, westbound, and
southbound approaches at the
Franklin Road/George
Washington Boulevard
intersection
shall pay the traffic
impact fee.

Lincoln Road/ Sanborn Road
c) The project applicant(s) shall be
responsible to install a traffic
signal and construct one left-turn
lane and one shared
through/right-turn lane on all
approaches at the Lincoln
Road/Sanborn Road intersection.

Payment of required
fair share fee. If it is
added to the City’s Fee
Study Program the
project applicant(s)
shall be responsible for
complying with the Fee
Study Program.

Final Building
Permit

4.12-4. Under Existing Plus
Full LESP Project
conditions, the LESP
could increase traffic
volumes at study
intersections under
Caltrans Jurisdiction.

Lincoln Road/SR 99
e) The project applicant(s) shall be
pay traffic impact fees to modify
the traffic signal and widen the
eastbound approach to provide a
second left-turn lane at the
Lincoln Road/SR 99 intersection.

Payment of required
fair share fee. This
intersection is part of
the City AB1600 fee
program. Developer
shall pay the traffic
impact fee.

Final Building
Permit

4.12-5. The proposed project
could increase
demand for public
transit service beyond
that currently planned
and may result in
unmet transit needs.

The project applicant(s) shall
contribute its fair share of the cost to
provide public transit service and
additional park-and-ride space for the
plan area as determined by the City of
Yuba City through participation in a
benefit or assessment district or
through a separate agreement between
the applicant(s), the City of Yuba
City, and Yuba-Sutter Transit. At a
minimum, service is expected to
include the following components.
 Fixed-route bus service
connecting the plan area to
existing Yuba-Sutter Transit
service with a minimum of hourly
headways during normal
operating hours.
 Demand-responsive service
meeting ADA paratransit
requirements in the plan area.
 Expansion of peak period (AM
and PM) weekday commuter bus
Payment of required
fair share fee through
impact fee.

Final Building
Permit

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 16 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions
TABLE NO. 6

PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
Impact Mitigation Measure Action Timing
service to downtown Sacramento.
 Expansion of park-and-ride
space.

Costs shall include the capital costs of
transit vehicles and facilities as well
as the operating and maintenance cost
of the service beyond what would be
paid for through the transportation
development act (TDA) funding.

4.12-6. The proposed project
could increase
demand for bicycle
and pedestrian
facilities
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.12-
1(a)
Payment of required
fair share fee. This
intersection is part of
the City AB1600 fee
program. Developer
shall pay the traffic
impact fee.

Final Building
Permit

4.12-7. Under Cumulative
Plus Full LESP
Project conditions, the
LESP, in combination
with other
development, could
increase traffic
volumes at study
intersections in the
City of Yuba City.

Franklin Road/Harding Road
a) Implement Mitigation Measure

4.12-1(a)
Bogue Road/Sanborn Road
b) Until this intersection is added to
the City’s Traffic Impact Fee
Study Program, the project
applicant(s) shall pay a fair-share
to install a traffic signal at the
Bogue Road/Sanborn Road
intersection. If it is added to the
City’s Fee Study Program the
project applicant(s) shall be
responsible for complying with
the Fee Study Program.

Payment of required
fair share fee. This
intersection is part of
the City AB1600 fee
program. Developer
shall pay the traffic
impact fee.

Final Building
Permit

4.12-9. Under Cumulative
Plus Full LESP
Project conditions, the
LESP, in combination
with other
development, could
increase traffic
volumes at study
intersection in County
of Sutter.

Lincoln Road/ Sanborn Road
a) The project applicant(s) shall be
responsible to install a traffic
signal and construct one left-turn
lane and one shared
through/right-turn lane on all
approaches at the Lincoln
Road/Sanborn Road intersection).

Lincoln Road/ Harter Parkway
b) This project applicants(s) shall
Payment of required
fair share fee. If it is
added to the City’s Fee
Study Program the
project applicant(s)
shall be responsible for
complying with the Fee
Study Program
Payment of required
Final Building
Permit
Final Building

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 17 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions
TABLE NO. 6

PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
Impact Mitigation Measure Action Timing
pay a fair-share to modify the
traffic signal to provide an
overlap phase for the southbound
right-turn movement at the
Lincoln Road/Harter Parkway
intersection.
fair share fee. This
intersection is part of
the City AB1600 fee
program. Developer
shall pay the traffic
impact fee.

Permit

Focused Traffic Impact Analysis 18 | Page
Sohal Ranch Subdivisions

APPENDIX A

Agenda Item 21

CITY OF YUBA CITY

STAFF REPORT
Date: November 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Administration Department
Presentation By: Diana Langley, City Manager
Summary
Subject: Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency Letter of Support for the Yuba City Sediment Removal Project
Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor to submit a Letter of Support for the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency Yuba City Sediment Removal Project
Fiscal Impact: None to the City. SBFCA's estimated project cost is $10,203,000.

Purpose:

For the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency to pursue grant funding for the Yuba City Sediment Removal Project.

Council's Strategic Goal:

This item addresses Council's goal of Public Safety.

Background:

The failure of the Lake Oroville spillway in February 2017 resulted in excessive amounts of debris and sediment in the Feather River. The deposits removed natural habitat for local fish and made the Yuba City Boat Launch inaccessible during low flow periods. In 2020, SBFCA received Proposition 68 funding from the California Natural Resources Agency to remove approximately 65,000 cubic yards of sediment to increase channel capacity and improve access to the river.

Analysis:

The Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency (SBFCA) is applying for a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) fisheries grant to pursue funding for another sediment removal project. The NOAA funding opportunity is for transformational habitat restoration and coastal resilience projects under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act. SBFCA's funding ask to NOAA is ~$10.2M, which includes project management, final design, environmental support, construction management support, and implementation costs associated with the project.

SBFCA's Sediment Removal Project is a sediment excavation ecosystem rehabilitation project at the confluence of the Feather and Yuba Rivers. The project aims to improve reaches of the lower Feather

and Yuba Rivers used by anadromous fish during their adult immigration and juvenile emigration periods and short-term holding and rearing. SBFCA is applying for funding for Phase 2 of the project, which will remove an additional approximately 250,000 cubic yards of sediment immediately downstream of the Phase 1 area to further restore fish passage, improve conveyance at the confluence of the Yuba and Feather Rivers, enhance habitat values for anadromous fish species, remove public recreational safety hazards, and improve access by emergency response vessels in the vicinity. The project will target streamflow enhancements to benefit critical habitat and the following species: Chinook - Central Valley fall/late fall run, Central Valley spring-run, Central Valley steelhead, and green sturgeon.

Fiscal Impact:

The funding needed for the project is $10,203,000.

Alternatives:

Do not support the project.

Recommendation:

Authorize the Mayor to submit a Letter of Support for the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency Yuba City Sediment Removal Project.

Attachments:

1. Attachment 1 - SBFCA Letter of Support

2. Attachment 2 - SBFCA Sediment Removal Project Information Sheet Prepared By: Submitted By:

Diana Langley
City Manager
Diana Langley
City Manager

ATTACHMENT 1

November 7, 2023
Mr. Michael Bessette
Executive Director
Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency
Post Office Box M
Yuba City, CA 95992
RE: SUPPORT FOR THE SUTTER BUTTE FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY (SBFCA)

YUBA CITY SEDIMENT REMOVAL PROJECT
Dear Mr. Bessette:

By this communication, the City of Yuba City indicates its support for the Yuba City Sediment Removal Project. Sediment buildup in portions of the Feather River, exacerbated by the Oroville Dam Spillway incident of 2017, has created dangerous conditions for recreational users and has negatively impacted fish migration along this reach of the Feather River. We have reviewed the proposed project and agree that implementation of this project would provide significant enhancements to restoring river access and fish passage conditions at the confluence of the Yuba and Feather Rivers.

The City of Yuba City supports jointly produced and implemented multi-benefit projects such as this one because they provide greater efficiency in the use of scarce public funds and better overall results. The City of Yuba City appreciates the willingness of SBFCA to serve as the lead agency for this joint effort and we fully support the efforts of SBFCA as they seek external funding for this project.

Sincerely,
Wade Kirchner
Mayor

ATTACHMENT 2

Sheet 1 of 2 | July 31, 2023
Feather River Sediment Removal
Project
Project Area
The project area includes a
reach of the lower Feather
River located just downstream
of the confluence with the
Yuba River, south of
Marysville and Yuba City.

Background
When the Lake Oroville
spillway failed in February
2017, excessive amounts of
debris and sediment were
washed down the Feather
River. The soil, sand, and gravel deposits removed natural habitat for local fish and made the Yuba City Boat Launch inaccessible during low flow periods, restricting waterway access for recreation and emergency response. In 2020, SBFCA received Proposition 68 funding from the California Natural Resources Agency to remove approximately 65,000 cubic yards of sediment (Phase 1) to increase channel capacity and improve access to the river.

Project Description
The Phase 2 project goal is to remove an additional 250,000 cubic yards of sediment at the confluence of the Feather and Yuba Rivers to further restore fish passage, improve
conveyance at the confluence of these rivers, enhance habitat values for anadromous fish species, remove public
recreational safety hazards, and improve access for emergency response vessels in the vicinity. The project area involves two major Central Valley rivers supporting federal and California ESA-listed anadromous fish. The project must move forward quickly to capitalize on the environmental and permitting work that was funded and completed during Phase 1, which will expire in April 2026. Additionally, there are significant cost savings associated with the opportunity to dispose of the sediment at the City of Marysville’s Wastewater Treatment Ponds located just north of the confluence, eliminating the need for significant disposal hauling and resulting in
substantial cost savings. Figure 1: Aerial Imagery of the In-Channel Sediment Accumulation to be Removed in Phase 2 of the Feather
River Sediment Removal Project
Phase 2
Project Area
Phase 1
Project Area

Sheet 2 of 2 | July 31, 2023
Primary Goals
• Remove Excess Sediment Buildup – Increase flow
conveyance and improve water/sediment quality in
the local and downstream areas.
• Improve Fish Passage Conditions – Improve
available deep-water pools and restore important
migratory and short-term rearing habitat for federal
and California ESA-listed anadromous fish species.
• Improve Emergency and Recreational Egress –
Increase access for emergency response and
recreational vessels for disadvantaged communities
along the Feather and Yuba Rivers.

Supporting Goals
• Water Quality – Remove excess fine sediments which may have entrapped pollutants, decrease turbidity, and restore the natural flow regime and hydraulics within the project area. • Ecosystem Benefits – Restore designated critical habitat for Chinook-Central Valley fall/late fall run, Central Valley spring-run, Central Valley steelhead, and green sturgeon. An increase in deep-water pools and holding locations will aid migrating salmonids by providing more conducive in-stream conditions and places to rest during their lengthy upstream migrations. Additional benefits include an increase in habitat complexity, food supply, and foraging success.
• Disadvantage Communities – Provide hydraulic, ecological, emergency, and recreational benefits to disadvantaged communities.
• Economic Activity – Stimulate the local economy through short- and long-term construction activities and improved recreational opportunities.

Project Funding Needs
Funding for Phase 2 is needed to prepare the construction bid package, conduct environmental monitoring during construction, construction management and engineering during construction, and construction. The volume of excavation is currently proposed as 250,000 cubic yards. This can be easily scaled to remove less volume from the river, based on available funding, and still result in beneficial improvements to the region. If done soon, the project will be more cost-efficient because it would capitalize on permitting completed during Phase 1 (i.e., all permits and approvals have been obtained for the Phase 2 work) and the temporary opportunity to dispose of sediment at the City of Marysville’s Wastewater Treatment Pond. The current funding need is approximately $10,203,000. See table below for a breakdown of the project cost by task:

Task
Number Description Cost
Task 1 Project Management $188,000
Task 2 Final Civil Design & Prepare Bid Package $75,000 Task 3 Environmental Monitoring $870,000
Task 4 Construction Management and
Engineering During Construction $870,000
Task 5 Construction $8,200,000
Total $10,203,000
SBFCA does not currently have any grant applications under consideration but is actively pursuing funding opportunities.

Figure 2: Sediment Deposited South of the Confluence of the Feather and the Yuba Rivers that will be Dredged in Phase 2

Agenda Item 22

CITY OF YUBA CITY

STAFF REPORT
Date: November 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Administration Department
Presentation By: George Barlow, Administrative Analyst
Summary
Subject: Community Sponsorship
Recommendation: Consider the sponsorship request from the Sutter County Community Memorial Museum Association, and if approved:

A. Adopt a Resolution to approve a monetary sponsorship request from the Sutter County Community Memorial Museum Association of $1,000.00 for sponsorship of the Annual Trees & Traditions fundraiser event Fiscal Impact: Monetary Sponsorship in the amount of $1,000.00 - Account No. 4220- 66015 (Community Events)
Council's Strategic Goal:

The overarching strategic goal of "Quality of Life."
Purpose:

City sponsorships reflect support of specific programs or events by an organization. The intent is that the public will receive some intrinsic cultural, economic, educational, or entertainment value from the program or event.

Background:

On January 18, 2022, Council adopted an Amended Community Sponsorship Policy which specifies the following factors that will be considered during the approval process:
• The City Council will approve all monetary sponsorship requests at a public meeting. • Resources available (e.g., budget, staff, workload capacity, etc.) • Compatibility with the strategic goals of the City Council and the mission of Yuba City. • Impact of an event on City Facilities.
• Risk to the City.
• The ability of the organization to obtain liability insurance naming the City as an additional insured.

• The overall benefit to the community.

The following sponsorship request was received from:

Sutter County Community Memorial Museum Association
The Museum is a partnership between Sutter County and the Community Memorial Museum Association, a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization. The Association supports all of the public programming aspects of the Museum, including education programs, fundraising events, temporary exhibits, updates to permanent exhibits, and the Museum Store.

The Sutter County Museum shares local stories to strengthen community bonds, inspire the celebration of our diverse cultural heritage, and demonstrate how understanding the past prepares us for the future.

Analysis:

The Amended Community Sponsorship Policy states, "The budget for the Community Sponsorship Program shall be established by City Council each year during the annual budget process," and "applications will be presented to Council quarterly on a first-come, first-serve basis." Through the FY 23/24 Budget, the Council established the following.

Account Number Description Funding Budgeted Funding Available 4220-66010 Community Contributions $20,000 $20,000
4220-66015 Community Events $10,000 $10,000
As noted above, the budgeted funds are to be considered and allocated on a quarterly basis, which provides $5,000 quarterly for Community Contributions and $2,500 quarterly for Community Events.

Fiscal Impact:

Monetary Sponsorship in the amount of $1,000.00 from Account No. 4220-66015 (Community Events).

Recommendation:

Consider the sponsorship request from the Sutter County Community Memorial Museum Association, and if approved:

A. Adopt a Resolution to approve a monetary sponsorship request from the County Community Memorial Museum Association of $1,000.00 for the sponsorship of the annual Trees & Traditions fundraiser event.

Attachments:

1. RESOLUTION - Community Sponsorship Request Sutter County Community Memorial Museum Assoc

2. Sutter County Museum Sponsorship Request
Prepared By: Submitted By:

George Barlow
Administrative Analyst
Diana Langley
City Manager

ATTACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION NO._______

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUBA CITY APPROVING

COMMUNITY SPONSORSHIP REQUEST FOR, THE SUTTER COUNTY COMMUNITY

MEMORIAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, The Sutter County Community Memorial Museum Association, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, is requesting community sponsorship funds for their ongoing public program; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Yuba City (“City Council”) finds that the Sutter County Community Memorial Museum Association, a nonprofit organizations that serves an important public purpose to the community insofar as the public will receive cultural, and educational enrichment from the program; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Yuba City does hereby resolve as follows:

Section 1. That the City Council finds the above recitals true and correct.

Section 2. The City Council finds that the Sutter County Community Memorial Museum Association provides events that benefit Yuba City residents. The requested fundraising event is for a qualified non-profit organization that primarily serves Yuba City residents, is open to the general public, and will contribute positively to the recognition and image of the city. Proceeds from the event will help bring innovative, education programs to inspire and celebrate the community’s diverse population. Accordingly, the City Council approves the sponsorship request of $1,000 for the Sutter County Community Memorial Museums Association's “Trees and Traditions: Home for Christmas.

Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately and that the Deputy City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

The foregoing Resolution of the City Council of the City of Yuba City is duly introduced, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting thereof held on this 7th day of November, 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
____________________________
Wade Kirchner, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Ciara Wakefield, Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM

COUNSEL FOR YUBA CITY

___________________________
Shannon L. Chaffin, City Attorney

ATTACHMENT 2

‧
‧‧


‧
‧‧






‧
‧‧



Agenda Item 23

CITY OF YUBA CITY

STAFF REPORT
Date: November 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;City of Yuba City From: Development Services Department
Presentation By: Doug Libby, Deputy Director of Development Services Summary
Subject: Consideration of 763 Reeves Ave Public Convenience or Necessity Request Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution making a finding of public convenience or necessity for the transfer of a Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer & Wine) Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License at the northeast corner of Cooper Ave and Reeves Ave (763 Reeves Ave)
Fiscal Impact: No direct fiscal impact will result from recommending approval of the proposed Alcoholic Beverage Control application
Purpose:

Consideration to make a finding of public convenience or necessity for the transfer of a Type 20 (OffSale Beer & Wine) Alcoholic Beverage Control License at the northeast corner of Cooper Ave and Reeves Ave for continued use as a convenience store.

Council’s Strategic Goal:

Business Friendly.

Background:

The City has received an Alcoholic and Beverage Control (ABC) application from the property owner at 763 Reeves Avenue, Shiraz Kara, requesting approval to transfer an existing Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer & Wine) license from 1301 E Chapman Ave, Fullerton CA, to this location. ABC defines this license type as providing for the sale of beer, and wine for consumption off the premises. It does not allow for the sale of open containers of alcohol.

When ABC receives an application for a location where a high concentration of licenses exists, or has a crime rate exceeding 120% of the average, the local government is required to approve the proposal before ABC approves it. In this instance, it is not the concentration of existing licenses that are in place but rather the crime rate exceeds 120 percent of the average number of offenses (1,389) in the census tract. The application indicates that in Police Beat No. 3, 1,586 offenses have occurred over a 1-year period in which the statistic was taken.

On March 7, 2023, the City Council approved the transfer of the existing Type 21 (Off-Sale General) license from 763 Reeves to 759 Reeves Avenue. The previous tenant at 763 Reeves Avenue (Cooper Avenue Market) is constructing a new store immediately adjacent at 759 Reeves Avenue, and transferred the Type 21 (Off-Sale General) license to the new location. The property owner of the former store has found a new tenant with a Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer and Wine) license and desires to

transfer their license to 763 Reeves Ave to operate a convenience store that provides for the sale of beer and wine.

The transfer of the Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer and Wine) license adds an additional license to this census tract where the two establishments will operate side-by-side to one another.

Analysis:

The owner of 763 Reeves Ave proposes that the convenience store be open until 8pm, daily. Both ABC and State Business and Professions Code, Section 23958, states the local governing body (City Council in this instance) must determine that there is a public convenience or necessity served to the community, in order for the license application to be approved by ABC due to the crime rate exceeding 120% of the average number of offenses per district.

The Police Department has reviewed the application and has not expressed opposition to the proposal.

Fiscal Impact:

No direct fiscal impact will result from making a finding of public convenience and necessity for the transfer of a Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer & Wine) Alcoholic Beverage Control License at the northeast corner of Cooper Ave and Reeves Ave in Yuba City.

Alternatives:

Do not make a finding of public convenience and necessity for the transfer of a Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer & Wine) Alcoholic Beverage Control License at the northeast corner of Cooper Ave and Reeves Ave in Yuba City.

Recommendations:

Adopt a Resolution making a finding of public convenience and necessity for the transfer of a Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer & Wine) Alcoholic Beverage Control License at the northeast corner of Cooper Ave and Reeves Ave in Yuba City.

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution PCN 763 Reeves Ave

2. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Application

3. Applicant Letter of Support

4. Staff Report for 759 Reeves Ave public convenience and necessity Prepared By: Submitted By:

Aaron Brown
Assistant Planner
Diana Langley
City Manager

ATTACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION NO. _________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUBA CITY

MAKING A FINDING OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR THE TRANSFER OF A TYPE 20 (OFF-SALE BEER & WINE)

ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC) LICENSE AT THE

NORTHEAST CORNER OF COOPER AVE AND REEVES AVE, YUBA
CITY (763 REEVES AVE)
WHEREAS, pursuant to applicable provisions of the Business and Professions Code, the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (hereinafter the “ABC”) is charged with the responsibility of reviewing applications and issuance of licenses for the sale and/or manufacture of alcoholic beverages in the State of California; and
WHEREAS, Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code provides that the ABC shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem, or if issuance would result in or add to an undue concentration of licenses, except as provided in Section 23958.4 of said Business and Professions Code; and WHEREAS, Section 23958.4 of the Business and Professions Code provides that, notwithstanding the limitations of Section 23958, the ABC shall issue a license if the applicant shows that “public convenience or necessity” would be served by the issuance of such license; and
WHEREAS, the City of Yuba City has received an application for a Public Convenience and Necessity determination that was filed by Shiraz Kara, the (“Applicant”) who is the owner of the store located at 763 Reeves Ave, in Yuba City, requesting a letter of Public Convenience and Necessity to allow a Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer & Wine) License in a census tract that is under the capacity for the number of allotted licenses and is located in Police Beat 3 which has a higherthan-average crime rate; and WHEREAS, said Section 23958.4 further provides that the determination of “public convenience or necessity” shall be made by the local governing body of the area in which the applicant’s premises are located with regard to certain applications, including on-site sales of alcohol at 763 Reeves Ave; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered this matter, and desires to find that a public convenience and necessity will be served by granting the transfer of a Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer & Wine) License to the future convenience store to be located at 763 Reeves Ave, in Yuba City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Yuba City as follows:

1. The recitals and findings set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.

2. The City Council finds that this matter is not a “project” for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it is merely a determination whether the public

convenience and necessity would be served by the transfer of a Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer & Wine) License for the location at 763 Reeves Ave. It does not have a potential for resulting in a reasonably foreseeable physical change to the existing environment.

3. The City Council finds and determines the public convenience and necessity is met in the present circumstances for reasons including the following:
a. Approving the PCN will not have a potential for resulting in a reasonably foreseeable physical change to the existing environment. It is commonly accepted throughout the industry that convenience stores sell alcoholic beverages. The Applicant has demonstrated through past performance and intended operational characteristics that alcoholic beverages will be sold safely and in accordance with applicable laws. b. The request to permit alcohol sales for off-premise consumption in conjunction with this establishment will not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area because this use is compatible with the nearby developments.
c. The determination of Public Convenience or Necessity, under the conditions imposed, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Yuba City.

4. This resolution shall take effect immediately.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Yuba City at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of November, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Wade Kirchner, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ciara Wakefield, City Clerk Administrator

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Shannon L. Chaffin, City Attorney

ATTACHMENT 2

ATTACHMENT 3

Re: Beer / Wine off sale License
Shiraz Kara
Cooper Mart
763 Reeves Ave
Yuba City, Ca 95991
The store has been exis�ng since 1950’s serving the
neighborhood with basic everyday household needs, including Beer/wine. Cooper Mart will con�nue to serve the community as it has done in the past.

In today’s compe��ve market, from the big stores, the
survival of the store will depend on the items it offers for sale, besides grocery items. Selling Beer and wine is a necessity for its survival.

Serving our repeated customers with pride and joy, there has never been any major incidents, that includes robbery or any hold ups.

The existence and survival of the store would be a big plus to the community.

Store hours will be 8am to 8pm Monday to Sunday.

Date: March 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council
From: Development Services Department
Presentation By: Doug Libby, AICP, Deputy Director of Development Services Summary
Subject: Cooper Market Liquor Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Premise-To-Premise Transfer Application
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution making a finding of public convenience or necessity for the premise-to-premise transfer of a Type 21 (Off-Sale General) Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License at 759 Reeves Avenue (Cooper Market Liquor).

Fiscal Impact: No direct fiscal impact will result from recommending approval of the proposed Alcoholic Beverage Control application.

Purpose:

Consideration to make a finding of public convenience or necessity for the premise-to-premise transfer of a Type 21 (Off-Sale General) Alcoholic Beverage Control License at 759 Reeves Avenue (Cooper Market Liquor).

Council’s Strategic Goal:

Business Friendly.

Background:

The City has received an application from Charnjit Singh, and Paramjit Kaur who operate Cooper Market Liquor located at 763 Reeves Avenue, which is located on the corner of Cooper, and Reeves Ave. They are requesting a Type 21 (Off-Sale General) premise-to-premise license transfer with the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. The application states the applicant currently holds a Type 21 (Off-Sale General) license, which provides for the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption off the premises where sold.

The application also states the business has never been suspended from the sale of alcoholic beverages or fined by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Department (ABC) in the last 17 years of operation. The applicant states the reason for changing the license location is because the landlord is increasing the rent significantly at the completion of their current lease agreement. As a result, the applicants have purchased the adjacent lot (759 Reeves Avenue) where they are pursuing constructing a new market location to continue their business.

When ABC receives an application for a location where a high concentration of licenses exist within an existing census tract, and/or a crime rate exceeding 25% of the average, the local

government is required to approve an application before ABC takes final action. In this instance, Cooper Market Liquor’s application states the average number of offenses per district is 1157, while the total number of offenses in the reporting district is 1621, exceeding 120% of the average number of offenses. This location is in Yuba City Police Beat Number Four.

Analysis:

Cooper Market Liquor is open until 10pm every day. The ABC and State Business and Professions Code, Section 23958, states the governing body must determine that the approval of this license would provide public convenience or necessity, in order for the license application to be approved by ABC in this location due to the total number of offenses in the reporting district exceeding 120% of the average number of offenses.

Development Services staff and Police Commander Escheman has reviewed the application and believe that a public convenience is provided through the sale of alcohol at this business location.

Fiscal Impact:

No direct fiscal impact will result from making a finding of public convenience and necessity for the premise-to-premise transfer of a Type 21 (Off-Sale General) Alcoholic Beverage Control License at 759 Reeves Avenue in Yuba City (Cooper Market Liquor).

Alternatives:

Do not make a finding of public convenience and necessity for the premise-to-premise transfer of a Type 21 (Off-Sale General) Alcoholic Beverage Control License at 759 Reeves Avenue in Yuba City (Cooper Market Liquor).

Recommendations:

Adopt a Resolution making a finding of public convenience and necessity for the premise-topremise transfer of a Type 21 (Off-Sale General) Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License at 759 Reeves Avenue in Yuba City (Cooper Market Liquor).

Attachments:

1. Resolution making a finding of public convenience and necessity for the premise-topremise transfer of a Type 21 (Off-Sale General) Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License from 763 Reeves Avenue to 759 Reeves Avenue in Yuba City (Cooper Market Liquor).

2. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Application Prepared By: Submitted By:

Aaron Brown Diana Langley
Assistant Planner City Manager

Agenda Item 24

CITY OF YUBA CITY

STAFF REPORT
Date: November 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Public Works Department
Presentation By: Ben Moody, Public Works & Development Services Director Summary
Subject: Water Treatment Plant Backwash Flowmeter
Recommendation: Approve a Capital Acquisition of an Endress Hauser clamp-on flowmeter for the backwash valve at the Water Treatment Plant
Fiscal Impact: $26,000 – Account No. 971227-65501 (Recurring WTP & Satellite Facility Improvements)
Purpose:

To replace the existing flowmeter on the backwash valve piping at the Water Treatment Plant (WTP).

Council’s Strategic Goals:

This item addresses the Council’s Strategic Goals of Infrastructure and Public Safety by maintaining public health and safety through the reliable operation of drinking water treatment infrastructure.

Background:

The City’s water and wastewater infrastructure requires a number of flowmeters, which monitor the flow of the various types of water in the system. One of these flowmeters is located at the backwash valve at the WTP, which uses clean water to flush residual untreated water from the system back into the Feather River. Reliable function of the associated flowmeter is critical to monitor and control the pressure and flow required for this process and, ultimately, maintain the integrity of the potable water produced by the WTP.

Analysis:

The flowmeter at the backwash valve has unexpectedly malfunctioned and requires full replacement, which could not be anticipated during the Fiscal Year 23/24 budget cycle.

Public Works has evaluated the equipment and recommends replacement with an Endress Hauser clamp-on flowmeter. This will allow for easy calibration and adjustment once installed, is readily available, and matches the manufacturer of other new flowmeters in the water and wastewater systems for consistency and performance.

Fiscal Impact:

Purchase and installation of the flowmeter, including contingency, is $26,000. There is sufficient funding for this item in CIP Account No. 971227-65501 (Recurring WTP & Satellite Facility Improvements).

Alternatives:

None at this time, as it is necessary for continued safe operation of critical infrastructure.

Recommendation:

Approve a capital acquisition of an Endress Hauser clamp-on flowmeter for the backwash valve at the Water Treatment Plant.

Attachments:

None
Prepared By: Submitted By:

Scarlett O. Harris
Administrative Analyst II
Diana Langley
City Manager

Agenda Item 25

CITY OF YUBA CITY

STAFF REPORT
Date: November 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Administration Department
Presentation By: Ciara Wakefield, City Clerk Administrator Summary
Subject: Appointments to the City of Yuba City Youth Commission Recommendation: Approve the Recommendations for Appointments to the Youth Commission Fiscal Impact: None
Purpose:

To fill vacancies and confirm the appointment of seven (7) Commissioners to the Yuba City Youth Commission.

Background:

The Youth Commission acts in an advisory capacity to the City Council, City Manager and the Community Services Director in all matters pertaining to youth and all general matters concerning issues affecting youth and the City of Yuba City. The Commission consists of nine members and up to three alternates. The Commission meets on the 3rd Wednesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Sutter Room at City Hall and members must be between the ages of 12 and 19 years of age and reside within the City limits. Advertisements and notices for vacant positions were posted through social media, local high schools, and the Appeal Democrat.

Municipal Code Section 2-11 defines a rotating appointment schedule for the Youth Commission. Four members shall be appointed in odd years, five members shall be appointed in even years, and alternates take turns rotating between years as follows:

Odd years: Four members, plus alternates 1 and an optional alternate 3.

Even years: Five members, plus an optional alternate 2.

Additionally, Gabby Rojo has withdrawn her interest in serving as an alternate on the Youth Commission.

This creates a third alternate vacancy this year.

The term of service for all members is two years. The application and selection process for current vacancies on the Youth Commission is complete.

Seven (7) appointments are recommended (4 Commissioners and 3 Alternates):

Commission Name Term Ending
Youth Commission Nimervir Thiara (Moving from Alternate) 6/29/2024 Youth Commission Jackson Miller (Moving from Alternate) 6/29/2024 Youth Commission Sukhraj Gill 6/29/2025
Youth Commission Maddy de Lange 6/29/2025
Youth Commission (Alternate)Amelia Mullen 6/29/2025
Youth Commission (Alternate)Ellie Hartridge Gundershaug 6/29/2025 Youth Commission (Alternate)Nanak Tumber 6/29/2024
Fiscal Impact:

None
Recommendation:

Approve the Recommendation of Appointments to the Youth Commission.

Attachments:

None
Prepared By: Submitted By:

Ciara Wakefield
City Clerk Administrator
Diana Langley
City Manager

Agenda Item 26

CITY OF YUBA CITY

STAFF REPORT
Date: November 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Public Works Department
Presentation By: Ben Moody, Public Works & Development Services Director Summary
Subject: Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Round 1 Grant Project 5 (Environmental Document Approval)
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution adopting a CEQA Class 1 Categorical Exemption for the Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Round 1 Grant Project 5 – Trash Capture Device in Gilsizer Slough Project (21-18) Fiscal Impact: Minimal staff time associated with developing and filing the Notice of Exemption, which is budgeted for through Capital Improvement Program Account No. 911297-65501
Purpose:

To improve downstream ecosystems connected to Gilsizer Slough by removing pollutants from surface waters and complying with pending State trash capture requirements.

Council's Strategic Goal:

This project addresses City Council's Strategic Goal of Improving Infrastructure by providing stormwater infrastructure in Gilsizer Slough that improves water quality.

Background:

In 2019, Butte County was the lead agency for the North Sacramento Valley Integrated Regional Water Management (NSV IRWM) Region’s Proposition 1 Round 1 grant funding application. Butte County examined various stakeholder’s projects that have been identified in approved Storm Water Resource Plans (SWRP) from various NSV IRWM stakeholders. Two of the City’s SWRP projects were selected to be included in Butte County’s NSV IRWM Proposition 1 Round 1 grant application: Project 4 Gilsizer North Detention Basin Improvement Project and Project 5 Trash Capture Device in Gilsizer Slough Project. The City’s projects were awarded funding by DWR in the amount of $970,700 on July 3, 2020.

Project 5 involves installing a full capture trash capture device to a newly constructed concrete pad at the bottom of Gilsizer Slough downstream of Lincoln Rd. Refer to Attachment 2 for a location map.

On April 5, 2022, Council approved awarding a Professional Services Agreement to West Yost for development of plans and specifications, required permit applications, and other services for the City’s projects.

Analysis:

West Yost is in the process of developing the plans and specifications for Project 5. The design for the project includes construction of a concrete pad as an addition to an existing culvert in Gilsizer Slough where a trash capture device will be installed. The area of the addition to the culvert will be less than 2,500 square feet.

The City needs to provide evidence of complying with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in order to proceed with various permit applications, including a California Department of Fish and Wildlife 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement, California Regional Water Quality Control Board Clean Water Act 401 Water Quality Certification, and United State Environmental Protection Agency Clean Water Act 404 permit.

Staff have performed a preliminary environmental assessment of this project and have determined that the Project falls within the Class 1 Categorical Exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(e)(1), as the Project is defined as a minor addition to existing structures provided that the addition will not result in an increase of more than 2,500 square feet. Further, none of the exceptions to Categorical Exemptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines 15300.2 apply to this project. As such the City adopts a Categorical Exemption per CEQA Guidelines section 15301(e)(1) for this project.

Once permit applications submitted and approved, West Yost can finalize the plans and specifications for the Project. Staff will return to Council at a later date for approval of the plans and specifications and authorization to advertise the Project for bids.

Fiscal Impact:

Minimal staff time associated with developing and filing the Notice of Exemption, which is budgeted for through Capital Improvement Program Account No. 911297-65501.

Alternatives:

Do not adopt the categorical exemption and direct staff to perform additional environmental analysis resulting in a delay of the project and potentially forfeiture of awarded grant funds.

Recommendation:

Adopt a Resolution adopting a CEQA Class 1 Categorical Exemption for the Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Project 5 Trash Capture Device in Gilsizer Slough Project.

Attachments:

1. Prop 1 IRWM Project CEQA Exemption RESOLUTION 21-18

2. Project 5 Project Location Map
Prepared By: Submitted By:

William Jow
Assistant Engineer
Diana Langley
City Manager

ATTACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION NO. _________

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUBA CITY ADOPTING A CEQA CLASS 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE
NORTH SACRAMENTO VALLEY PROPOSITION 1 ROUND 1 GRANT
PROJECT 5 TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE IN GILSIZER SLOUGH
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department intends to submit a Notice of Exemption for the North Sacramento Valley Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Project 5 Trash Capture Device in Gilsizer Slough Project (Project).

NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved and ordered by the City Council of the City of Yuba City as follows:

1. Staff have performed a preliminary environmental assessment of this project and has determined that the Project falls within the Class 1 Categorical Exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(e)(1), where the Project is defined as a minor addition to existing structures provided that the addition will not result in an increase of more than 2,500 square feet. Further, none of the exceptions to Categorical Exemptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines 15300.2 apply to this project. As such the City adopts a Categorical Exemption per CEQA Guidelines section 15301 for this project.

2. The Public Works Department is hereby authorized and directed to submit a Notice of Exemption for the Project.

The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Yuba City at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7 th day of November,
2023.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Wade Kirchner, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ciara Wakefield, Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
COUNSEL FOR YUBA CITY:

Shannon Chaffin, City Attorney
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP

ATTACHMENT 2

BOGUE ")
Northern Sacramento Valley (NSV) IRWM Prop 1
Implementation Projects
Project 5
Trash Capture Project in Gilsizer Slough at Bogue Rd
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles
") Project Location
Area of Benefit
Yuba City Limits
Y
u
b
a
C
o
u
nty
(Y
u
b
a
C
o
u
nty IRW
M)
Sutter County
(NSV IRWM)
Y
u
b
a
C
o
u
nty
(Y
u
b
a
C
o
u
nty IRW
M)
IRWM Boundaries "DAC" Block, Tract or Place ¯

Agenda Item 27

CITY OF YUBA CITY

STAFF REPORT
Date: November 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Public Works Department
Presentation By: Joshua Wolffe, Associate Engineer
Summary
Subject: Didar S. Bains Park - Storm Drain Connection
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution which takes the following actions:

A. Adopts a CEQA Class 4 Categorical Exemption
B. Awards a construction contract to North Star Construction and Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $127,676.39 through Sourcewell Contract No. CA-R3-GS02- 123021-NSC, with the finding that it is in the best interest of the City C. Authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents related to the project
Fiscal Impact: $140,444.03 – CIP Account No. 1207 (Harter Parkway Park and Bike Connection)
$140,444.03 – Total Project Cost
$127,676.39 – Construction Amount
$ 12,767.64 – 10% Contingency
Purpose:

To connect Didar S. Bains Park's storm drain piping to the City's storm drainage system.

Council Strategic Goal:

This project addresses two Council Strategic Goals, “Business Friendly” and “Infrastructure.” This project will construct storm drain infrastructure which will allow for conveyance of stormwater from the new park property into the City's storm drainage system. Through the improvements, the City will also be constructing infrastructure that will benefit the future northerly development, Harter North.

Background:

The City's newest park, Didar S. Bains Park (Park), was constructed between April 2022 and August 2023. During the utility installation portion of the Park's construction, it was determined that the Park's storm drain connection to the City's existing storm drainage infrastructure conflicted with future development plans for Harter North. To mitigate any conflicts, the City consulted with Harter North's

design engineers to determine a solution which would best suit both parties. Ultimately, it was determined that the best option would be for a storm junction drain inlet (SJDI) to be constructed, which would serve both the park and the northerly development. This SJDI would then connect to the City's storm drainage infrastructure via an existing manhole on Harter Parkway.

After review, the City determined that the Park would need a storm drain connection before Harter North would be constructed; therefore, the City would construct the new infrastructure. It was also determined based on the amount of work outside of the Park contractor's original contract, the complexity of the work, and the amount of traffic control needed, that it would be best to have a contractor other than the Park contractor to construct improvements.

Analysis:

North Star Construction and Engineering, Inc. (North Star) is a local contractor that the City has worked with numerous times in the past with great results. City staff regularly experiences high levels of competence, professionalism, and quality of work from North Star on projects which they construct for the City. North Star is interested and available to construct the aforementioned storm water infrastructure. In order to expedite the procurement process, Staff recommends utilizing the Sourcewell Cooperative Program (Sourcewell). If approved, and pending acceptable weather North Star would be able to begin the work in late November 2023. Work would likely be completed in December of 2023.

Sourcewell gathers nationwide bids for products and services resulting in time and cost efficiencies through the procurement process, and better purchasing leverage due to a nationwide scope. The City has utilized Sourcewell on various occasions in recent years for purchases and construction contracts, with great results. Some of these include: purchase of playground equipment, purchase of Public Works equipment, design/build contract for the bike park at Didar S. Bains Park, and design/build contract for the Blackburn Talley LED Stadium Lighting Retrofit.

Fiscal Impact:

North Star's Sourcewell contract is $127,676.39 for the proposed scope of work, a 10% construction contingency amount is $12,768, with a total proposed construction budget being $140,444. The project is proposed to be funded through the existing project account: CIP Account No. 1207 (Harter Parkway Park and Bikeway Connection), utilizing remaining project contingency funds. With the close-out of the park contract with Marina Landscapes, there will be sufficient contingency funds remaining in the project account to fund the storm drainage improvements. Staff will coordinate to update and establish encumbrances to fund the proposed project via CIP Account No. 1207.

Environmental:

Staff has performed a preliminary environmental assessment of this project relative to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements and determined that it falls within the Class 4 Categorical Exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15304, as the work involves minor trenching and backfilling, where the surface will be restored. Further, none of the exceptions to Categorical Exemptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines 15300.2 apply to this project.

Alternatives:

Do not award the Sourcewell Contract to North Star, and utilize the standard formal bidding procedures.

This will result in project delays.

Recommendation:

Adopt a Resolution which takes the following actions:

A. Adopts a CEQA Class 4 Categorical Exemption
B. Awards a construction contract to North Star Construction and Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $127,676.39 through Sourcewell Contract No. CA-R3-GS02-123021-NSC, with the finding that it is in the best interest of the City
C. Authorizes the City Manager to execute all necessary documents related to the project Attachments:

1. Attachment 1 - Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Sourcewell Contract
Prepared By: Submitted By:

Josh Wolffe
Associate Civil Engineer
Diana Langley
City Manager

ATTACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION NO. _________

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUBA CITY ADOPTING A CEQA CLASS 4 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION; AWARDING A

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO NORTH STAR CONSTRUCTION AND
ENGINEERING, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $127,676.39 THROUGH SOURCEWELL CONTRACT NO. CA-R3-GS02-123021-NSC, WITH THE FINDING THAT IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Yuba City desires utilize Sourcewell Cooperative Contract No. CA-R3-GS02-123021-NSC for the procurement of the Didar S. Bains Park – Storm Drain Connection construction contract at a competitively bid, negotiated price; and, WHEREAS, Sourcewell Cooperative awarded Contract No. CA-R3-GS02-123021- NSC to North Star Construction and Engineering, Inc, of Yuba City, CA following a nationwide competitive Request for Quotation process; and, WHEREAS, the City desires to award the bid to North Star Construction and Engineering, Inc. of Yuba City, CA through the Sourcewell Cooperative Contract No. CAR3-GS02-123021-NSC negotiated price of $127,676.39.

NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Yuba City as follows:

Section 1. The City Council finds and determines that a Class 4 Categorical Exemption set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15304, applies to this project, as the construction of the storm drain improvements is defined as minor alteration to land in which minor trenching and backfilling will occur.

Further, none of the exceptions to Categorical Exemptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines 15300.2 apply to this project.

Section 2. The City Council of the City Yuba City awards the construction contract to North Star Construction and Engineering Inc, of Yuba City, CA by piggybacking on the Sourcewell Cooperative Contract No. CAR3-GS02-123021-NSC negotiated price of $127,676.39, with the finding that it is in the best interest of the City.

Section 3. The City Manager is authorized to execute any agreement or other document required for the purchase subject to approval as to legal form by the City Attorney.

Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately.

The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Yuba City at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of November 2023.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Wade Kirchner, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ciara Wakefield, City Clerk Administrator

APPROVED AS TO FORM
COUNSEL FOR YUBA CITY:

Shannon Chaffin, City Attorney
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
Attachment(s):

A. Exhibit A – Quote: Sourcewell Contract Number CA-R3-GS02-123021- NSC

EXHIBIT A

Work Order Signature Document
EZIQC Contract No.: CA-R3-GS02-123021-NSC
City of Yuba City - Harter Parkway Storm Drain
New Work Order
122748.00
Modify an Existing Work Order
Work Order Title:

Work Order Number.: Work Order Date:

X
11/01/2023
Contractor Name:

Contact:

Phone:

Contact:

Phone:

Zach Milner
530-682-6151
Owner Name: City of Yuba City
Josh Wolffe
530-822-3288
North Star Construction and Engineering,Inc
Work to be Performed
Work to be performed as per the Final Detailed Scope of Work Attached and as per the terms and conditions of Sourcewell EZIQC Contract No CA-R3-GS02-123021-NSC.

Brief Work Order Description:

Harter Parkway Storm Drain
Liquidated Damages Will apply: Will not apply:

Estimated Completion Date:

Time of Performance Estimated Start Date:

X
Work Order Firm Fixed Price: $127,676.39
Owner Purchase Order Number:

Approvals
City of Yuba City Date Contractor Date

2.00

11/1/2023
Work Order Signature Document

3.00 Detailed Scope of Work
To: Zach Milner From: Josh Wolffe
North Star Construction and Engineering,Inc City of Yuba City 1282 Stabler Lane #630-109 1201 Civic Center Blvd.

Yuba City, CA 95993 Yuba City, CA 95993
530-682-6151 530-822-3288
Work Order Number:

Date Printed: November 01, 2023
122748.00
Work Order Title: City of Yuba City - Harter Parkway Storm Drain Brief Scope: Harter Parkway Storm Drain
Preliminary Revised X Final
The following items detail the scope of work as discussed at the site. All requirements necessary to accomplish the items set forth below shall be considered part of this scope of work.

DSOW:

1. Supply and Install 180 LF of 18-inch Type S HDPE from new JDI to existing SDMH in Harter Parkway.

2. Supply and Install 1 EA Junction Drop Inlet (JDI) per City Detail DR4. We will provide flattop lid in lieu of frame, grate, and hood.

3. Install 13 LF of 30-inch Type S HDPE Stub to the North of the new JDI.

4. Intercept existing 12-inch storm drain pipe from the new Park and terminate in new JDI.

5. Include Traffic Control, Aggregate Base, Paving and Striping Repairs for work in Harter Road.

6. Provide appropriate BMP’s for all work.

Exclusions/Clarifications:

1. Excludes aggregate base backfill for entire pipe run.

2. Proposal assumes native soil spoils can be left onsite (graded out.)

3. Proposal includes payment and performance bonds.

Subject to the terms and conditions of EZIQC Contract CA-R3-GS02-123021-NSC.

Contractor Date
City of Yuba City Date

11/1/2023
Scope of Work

4.00 Contractor's Price Proposal - Summary
Owner PO #:

City of Yuba City - Harter Parkway Storm Drain
122748.00
IQC Master Contract #: CA-R3-GS02-123021-NSC
Work Order #:

Title:

Re:

Date: November 01, 2023
Proposal Value:

Contractor: North Star Construction and Engineering,Inc $127,676.39
Section - 01 $54,148.53
Section - 02 $3,764.08
Section - 31 $36,739.35
Section - 32 $9,238.97
Section - 33 $23,785.46
Proposal Total
Thisl total represents the correct total for the proposal. Any discrepancy between line totals, sub-totals and the proposal total is due to rounding.
$127,676.39

11/1/2023
Contractor's Price Proposal - Summary

5.00 Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail
City of Yuba City - Harter Parkway Storm Drain
122748.00
IQC Master Contract #: CA-R3-GS02-123021-NSC
Work Order #:

Owner PO #:

Title:

Re:

Date: November 01, 2023
Proposal Value:

Contractor: North Star Construction and Engineering,Inc $127,676.39
Labor Equip. Material (Excludes)
Sect. Item Mod. UOM Description Line Total
Section - 01
01 22 16 00 0002 Reimbursable FeesReimbursable Fees will be paid to the contractor for eligible costs as directed by Owner. Insert the appropriate quantity to adjust the base cost to the actual Reimbursable Fee. If there are multiple Reimbursable Fees, list each one separately and add a comment in the "note" block to identify the Reimbursable Fee (e.g. sidewalk closure, road cut, various permits, extended warranty, expedited shipping costs, etc.). A copy of each receipt shall be submitted with the Price Proposal.
1 EA $2,750.00
Installation x x = 2,750.00
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
2,500.00 1.00 1.1000
Payment and Performance Bonds
2 01 22 20 00 0079 HR Flagperson For Traffic Control $17,933.47 Installation x x = 17,933.47
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
160.00 76.77 1.4600
All Traffic Control
01 22 20 00 0094 Painter, Ordinary Maintenance Crew With Truck And ToolsThis task will be used specifically for maintenance service calls.
3 HR $719.43
Installation x x = 719.43
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

4.00 123.19 1.4600
Pavement Markings
4 01 22 20 00 0094 0122 EA For Material Supplies On Each Service Call, Add $14.60 Installation x x = 14.60
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

1.00 10.00 1.4600
5 01 22 23 00 0231 EA Placement And Removal Of Steel Roadway Plates $3,274.49 Installation x x = 3,274.49
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

45.00 49.84 1.4600
3 plates for 2 weeks = 45 EA
6 01 22 23 00 0239 WK 1" x 5' x 10' Steel Plate $1,031.31 Installation x x = 1,031.31
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

6.00 117.73 1.4600
3 plates for 2 weeks = 6 weeks
7 01 22 23 00 0259 LF Cold Mix For Temporary Ramp Base, 6" At Edge Of Trench Plate $1,379.70 Installation x x = 1,379.70
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
450.00 2.10 1.4600
At Trench Plates
8 01 22 23 00 0457 WK 2' Rails, 1 Cylinder, Aluminum Hydraulic ShoringUp to 88" spread width. $1,228.33 Installation x x = 1,228.33
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

12.00 70.11 1.4600
6 rails for 2 weeks = 12 weeks
9 01 22 23 00 0875 DAY 2,500 PSI Pressure Washer With Full-Time Operator $2,118.69 Installation x x = 2,118.69
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

2.00 725.58 1.4600
Potholing

11/1/2023
Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail

Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail Continues..

Work Order Title:

Work Order Number: 122748.00
City of Yuba City - Harter Parkway Storm Drain
Section - 01
10 01 22 23 00 1423 WK 13 CY Rear Dump Truck With Full-Time Truck Driver $8,825.51 Installation x x = 8,825.51
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

1.00 6,044.87 1.4600
Support Excavation and Backfill in Harter Parkway & Dump Runs 11 01 22 23 00 1452 DAY 5,000 Gallon Vacuum Truck With Full-Time Truck Driver $5,424.08 Installation x x = 5,424.08
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

2.00 1,857.56 1.4600
Potholing
01 71 13 00 0004 First 25 Miles, Equipment Delivery, Pickup, Mobilization And Demobilization Using A Tractor Trailer With Up To 53' BedIncludes loading, tie-down of equipment, delivery of equipment, off loading on site, rigging, dismantling, loading for return and transporting away. For equipment such as bulldozers, motor scrapers, hydraulic excavators, gradalls, road graders, loader-backhoes, heavy duty construction loaders, tractors, pavers, rollers, bridge finishers, straight mast construction forklifts, telescoping boom rough terrain construction forklifts, telescoping and articulating boom man lifts with >40' boom lengths, etc.
12 EA $5,498.89
Installation x x = 5,498.89
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

4.00 941.59 1.4600
Excavator, Backhoe, Loader, Roller
01 74 19 00 0024 Vacuum, Pickup, Swap And Dump, Concrete Washout BinIncludes vacuum the liquid from the full bin and pick up the bin, and recycle all material. An empty bin will be left at the site if the project is not completed. 13 EA $3,154.86
Installation x x = 3,154.86
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

2.00 1,080.43 1.4600
Potholing Waste
14 01 74 19 00 0035 TON Traditional Building Construction Materials, Landfill Dump Fee $467.20 Installation x x = 467.20
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

4.00 80.00 1.4600
Construction Waste
15 01 74 19 00 0038 CY Asphalt, Concrete, Gravel And Subgrade Material, Landfill Dump Fee $327.97 Installation x x = 327.97
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

6.00 37.44 1.4600
From Harter Parkway and DI Waste
Subtotal for Section - 01 $54,148.53
Section - 02
16 02 41 13 13 0040 SF >3" To 6" By Hand, Break-up And Remove Bituminous Paving $1,319.84 Installation x x = 1,319.84
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
200.00 4.52 1.4600
Harter Parkway
02 41 19 13 0071 Saw Cut Minimum ChargeFor projects where the total saw cutting charge is less than the minimum charge, use this task exclusively. This task should not be used in conjunction with any other tasks in this section. 17 EA $1,353.68
Installation x x = 1,353.68
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

1.00 927.18 1.4600
All Saw cutting in Harter Parkway

11/1/2023
Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail

Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail Continues..

Work Order Title:

Work Order Number: 122748.00
City of Yuba City - Harter Parkway Storm Drain
Section - 02
02 41 19 13 0333 Core Drill Minimum ChargeFor projects where the total core drilling charge is less than the minimum charge, use task "Minimum Charge For Core Drilling" exclusively. Task "Minimum Charge For Core Drilling" should not be used in conjunction with any other tasks in this section. Does not apply to sections "Drilling In Concrete Per Inch Of Depth" or "Drilling In Brick Or Block Per Inch Of Depth".
18 EA $1,090.56
Installation x x = 1,090.56
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

1.00 746.96 1.4600
Core Drill Existing SDMH
Subtotal for Section - 02 $3,764.08
Section - 31
19 31 05 16 00 0024 CY Crusher Run Aggregate Fill (3/4" Minus) $6,911.64 Installation x x = 6,911.64
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
150.00 31.56 1.4600
Pipe Bedding and Backfill
20 31 05 16 00 0024 0057 For >96, Deduct -$1,200.12
Installation x x = -1,200.12
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
150.00 -5.48 1.4600
21 31 23 16 13 0003 CY Over 12" Wide, Excavation for Trenching by Machine in Soil $3,985.36 Installation x x = 3,985.36
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
405.00 6.74 1.4600
450 CY Total (90% by Machine = 405 CY: 10% by Hand = 45 CY) 31 23 16 13 0007 Excavation For Trenching By Hand In SoilIncludes stockpiling excess materials and trimming sides and bottom of trench.
22 CY $7,491.11
Installation x x = 7,491.11
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

45.00 114.02 1.4600
450 CY Total (90% by Machine = 405 CY: 10% by Hand = 45 CY) 31 23 16 13 0010 Backfilling or Placing Subbase for Trenches with Imported or Stockpiled Materials by Machine
23 CY $2,140.51
Installation x x = 2,140.51
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
405.00 3.62 1.4600
450 CY Total (90% by Machine = 405 CY: 10% by Hand = 45 CY) 31 23 16 13 0011 Backfilling or Placing Subbase for Trenches with Imported or Stockpiled Materials by Hand
24 CY $2,080.72
Installation x x = 2,080.72
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

45.00 31.67 1.4600
450 CY Total (90% by Machine = 405 CY: 10% by Hand = 45 CY) 31 23 16 13 0013 Compaction of Fill or Subbase for Trenches by Vibratory Plate, Air Tamper, Etcetera
25 CY $3,926.23
Installation x x = 3,926.23
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
405.00 6.64 1.4600
450 CY Total (90% by Machine = 405 CY: 10% by Hand = 45 CY) 26 31 23 16 13 0014 CY Compaction of Fill or Subbase for Trenches by Hand $2,347.46 Installation x x = 2,347.46
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

45.00 35.73 1.4600
450 CY Total (90% by Machine = 405 CY: 10% by Hand = 45 CY) 27 31 23 16 13 0019 CY Spread Excess Or Imported Material On Site With Machine $867.24 Installation x x = 867.24
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
200.00 2.97 1.4600
Excess from AB and Crashed Rock

11/1/2023
Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail

Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail Continues..

Work Order Title:

Work Order Number: 122748.00
City of Yuba City - Harter Parkway Storm Drain
Section - 31
28 31 23 16 13 0019 0077 For >50 To 250, Add $216.08
Installation x x = 216.08
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
200.00 0.74 1.4600
29 31 25 14 26 0027 EA Wattles (Sterile Straw Filled Rolls), 9" x 25' $1,842.52 Installation x x = 1,842.52
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

8.00 157.75 1.4600
BMP's
30 31 32 19 16 0012 SY 200 LB Grab Tensile Woven Slit Film Geotextile Fabric (Carthage Mills FX-55) $251.82 Installation x x = 251.82
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
112.00 1.54 1.4600
Geotextile for separation of crushed rock
31 31 32 19 16 0012 0088 For >50 To 150, Add $42.52
Installation x x = 42.52
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
112.00 0.26 1.4600
32 31 41 13 00 0005 SF 12' Deep Excavation, Wood Shoring, Pull And Salvage $5,836.26 Installation x x = 5,836.26
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
288.00 13.88 1.4600
6 EA x 12' x 4' = 288 SF
Subtotal for Section - 31 $36,739.35
Section - 32
33 32 11 16 16 0004 CY Class II Graded Crushed Aggregate Roadway Base Course $5,870.66 Installation x x = 5,870.66
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

50.00 80.42 1.4600
Backfill Harter Parkway
32 12 16 13 0023 Hand Placed Hot Mixed Asphalt 3,954 LB/CYFor small areas not reachable by machine. Includes placement, rolling, finishing and sweeping. 34 TON $3,368.31
Installation x x = 3,368.31
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

7.00 329.58 1.4600
Paving Hater Parkway
Subtotal for Section - 32 $9,238.97
Section - 33
35 33 05 61 00 0015 EA 8' Deep, 4' Diameter, Precast Concrete Manhole $4,445.71 Installation x x = 4,445.71
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

1.00 3,045.01 1.4600
DR4
36 33 05 61 00 0016 VLF Riser For 4' Diameter, Precast Concrete ManholeFor depths greater than 8'. $1,932.92 Installation x x = 1,932.92
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

4.00 330.98 1.4600
DR4
37 33 05 61 00 0019 EA Extended Base Slab For 4' Diameter, Precast Concrete Manhole $669.44 Installation x x = 669.44
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

1.00 458.52 1.4600
DR4
38 33 05 61 00 0020 EA Precast Channel For 4' Diameter, Precast Concrete Manhole $961.53 Installation x x = 961.53
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

1.00 658.58 1.4600
DR4

11/1/2023
Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail

Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail Continues..

Work Order Title:

Work Order Number: 122748.00
City of Yuba City - Harter Parkway Storm Drain
Section - 33
39 33 05 84 00 0005 EA 4' Diameter x 8" Thick Precast Manhole Top Slab $918.15 Installation x x = 918.15
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

1.00 628.87 1.4600
DR4
40 33 05 84 00 0089 EA >12" To 21", Bentonite Collar At Manhole Connection $906.62 Installation x x = 906.62
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

3.00 206.99 1.4600
12" Existing Pipe and 18" New Pipe
41 33 05 84 00 0090 EA >21" To 30" Pipe, Bentonite Collar At Manhole Connection $479.51 Installation x x = 479.51
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

1.00 328.43 1.4600
30" New Pipe
42 33 05 84 00 0109 EA 18" Tap In Existing Precast Concrete Manhole $1,877.02 Installation x x = 1,877.02
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

1.00 1,285.63 1.4600
18" New Pipe at Existing MH
33 42 11 00 0288 12" Bell And Spigot, Smooth Interior, Double Wall, Corrugated High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
43 LF $255.50
Installation x x = 0.00
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

0.00 26.14 1.4600
Demolition 20.00 x 8.75 x 1.4600 = 255.50
Existing 12" Pipe
33 42 11 00 0290 18" Bell And Spigot, Smooth Interior, Double Wall, Corrugated High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
44 LF $9,802.44
Installation x x = 9,802.44
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total
180.00 37.30 1.4600
New 18"Pipe
33 42 11 00 0292 30" Bell And Spigot, Smooth Interior, Double Wall, Corrugated High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
45 LF $1,424.07
Installation x x = 1,424.07
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

13.00 75.03 1.4600
New 30" Pipe
46 33 42 11 00 0292 0046 For <100, Add $112.55
Installation x x = 112.55
Quantity Unit Price Factor Total

13.00 5.93 1.4600
Subtotal for Section - 33 $23,785.46
Proposal Total
This total represents the correct total for the proposal. Any discrepancy between line totals, sub-totals and the proposal total is due to rounding.
$127,676.39

11/1/2023
Contractor's Price Proposal - Detail

Subcontractor Listing
122748.00
City of Yuba City - Harter Parkway Storm Drain
IQC Master Contract #: CA-R3-GS02-123021-NSC
Work Order #:

Owner PO #:

Title:

Re:

Date: November 01, 2023
Proposal Value:

Contractor: North Star Construction and Engineering,Inc $127,676.39
Name of Contractor Duties Amount %
No Subcontractors have been
selected for this Work Order
$0.00 0.00

6.00

11/1/2023
Subcontractor Listing

Agenda Item 28

CITY OF YUBA CITY

STAFF REPORT
Date: November 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Administration Department
Presentation By: Diana Langley, City Manager
Summary
Subject: Public Hearing No. 1 for Updating of City Councilmember District Boundaries for Annexed Property
Recommendation: A. Receive a report from staff on the redistricting process and permissible criteria to be considered to redraw district boundaries; and
B. Conduct a Public Hearing to receive public input on district boundaries to account for property annexed to the City
Fiscal Impact: None
Purpose:

To receive a report on the districting process for annexed property and permissible criteria to be considered to modify district boundaries; and conduct a Public Hearing to receive public input on district boundaries.

Council's Strategic Goal:

Including recently annexed areas into the City Council District Boundaries addresses the City Council's overarching goal of quality of life.

Background:

Prior to the November 2022 election, City Councilmembers were elected at-large in which every voter in the City voted for each member of Council, regardless of where the voter or the candidate is registered to vote in the City. Under a district-based system of elections, the City is divided into districts, candidates may only run for the seat representing the district in which they are registered to vote, and voters may only vote for a candidate from their district. One of the reasons for the transition is that district elections are consistent with the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA), which encourages district elections for communities with a significant population of minority groups.

Between September 21, 2021, and February 1, 2022, the City Council held five public hearings to establish a District-Based System of Elections for members of the City Council. On February 1, 2022, City Council adopted an Ordinance adding Sections 2-9.04, 2-9.05, and 2-9.06 to Chapter 2, Title 9 of the Yuba City Municipal Code to establish a District-Based System of Elections for members of the City

Council. The Ordinance is based on the National Demographics Corporation (NDC) Green Map (NDC Green Map),which is based on data from the 2020 census, and includes election sequencing to transition to a District-Based System of Elections.

Since the adoption of the current boundary maps, there have been significant annexations in the southwest and southern portions of Yuba City, adjacent to Council Districts 4 and 5. The annexed areas are currently primarily vacant agricultural land. The Council District Boundary Maps need to be modified to incorporate the annexed areas and be adopted prior to April 2024.

Analysis:

Process
The City Council typically chooses where the district lines will be drawn every 10 years based on the latest U.S. Census. Between these regular 10-year updates changes to district boundaries are typically not allowed under the Elections Code. However, there is an exception for circumstance here, as new territory has been annexed into the City and the total annexed territory contains less than 25% of the City's population. In such cases the City Council may update the district boundaries to allow for the new members of the community to vote in City elections, etc.

State laws set strict criteria for the updates of the district boundaries in such circumstances.

Specifically the City Council is required to add the new territory "to the nearest existing Council district without changing the boundaries of other Council district boundaries." Even though the criteria for setting the boundaries for annexed property is constrained by State law, the default procedures for redistricting boundaries still apply. Under these procedures the public will have the opportunity to draw and submit district maps for Council's consideration, and the City may develop its own maps for consideration. By law, the City must hold at least four public hearings that enable community members to provide input on the drawing of district maps:
• One Public Hearing will be held to invite public input regarding the composition of the City's voting districts before any draft maps are drawn. This hearing is currently scheduled for November 7, 2023.
• Three Public Hearings will be held to invite public input regarding the composition of the City's proposed modifications to the voting districts after the draft maps are drawn. These hearings are currently scheduled for December 19, 2023, and January 16 and February 6, 2024. • After the Public Hearings, the City Council will introduce an ordinance establishing a map with the modified voting division boundaries scheduled for February 20, 2024, and the ordinance will then be presented for final adoption on March 5, 2024.

Mandatory Criteria for Creating Districts
While public input concerning the composition of the City's voting divisions will be considered, as noted above there are several mandatory criteria that the City must comply with when the actual divisions are created:

1. Any annexed property must be added to the nearest existing Council district; and

2. No other changes to existing Council districts can occur.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact to modifying the boundaries other than staff time to prepare the necessary staff reports and modify the district boundary maps.

Alternatives:

Decline to hold a Public Hearing at this time.

Recommendation:

A. Receive a report from staff on the redistricting process and permissible criteria to be considered to redraw district boundaries; and
B. Conduct a Public Hearing to receive public input on district boundaries.

Attachments:

1. Attachment 1 - Council Districts Map with Annexations Prepared By: Submitted By:

Diana Langley
City Manager
Diana Langley
City Manager

ATTACHMENT 1

Agenda Item 29

CITY OF YUBA CITY

STAFF REPORT
Date: November 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Public Works Department
Presentation By: Phil Marler, Deputy Director Public Works - Utilities Summary
Subject: Laboratory Fee Schedule Update
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution amending the Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services to update the fees for laboratory services for Fiscal Year 23/24 Fiscal Impact: $30,000 annually
Revenue Account No. 518-44440 (Sewer – Lab Testing)
Direct Transfer from Account No. 7120 (Water Treatment Plant) Direct Transfer from Account No. 8120 (Wastewater Treatment Facility) Purpose:

To adjust laboratory service fees to more accurately recover costs for labor and materials from both internal and commercial customers.

Council’s Strategic Goals:

This item addresses Council’s Strategic Goal of Fiscal Responsibility by ensuring that the City provides laboratory testing and analytical services at a reasonable rate for internal and commercial water and wastewater customers that appropriately funds operations of the Laboratory.

Background:

The City of Yuba City owns and operates the only full-service State of California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP)-certified laboratory in the Yuba-Sutter region. The Laboratory supports both the Water Treatment Plant and Wastewater Treatment Facility’s sampling and analytical needs to meet state regulations. The City also provides these services to external customers, including individuals in the area with drinking water wells, well-drilling companies, private drinking water systems, and other regional public agencies which do not conduct their own testing.

The current fee schedule for commercial laboratory services is based on a fee study conducted in 2010, which fully evaluated the labor and materials required for each test and the ratio of internal to external services in order to sufficiently recover costs and divide costs appropriately between water rate payers, wastewater rate payers, and commercial customers. The fee schedule update was approved by Council in July 2010 with an annual CPI inflation factor.

In recent years, there have been a number of changes to the Laboratory’s services which are not captured by the current fee schedule structure due to changes in operations, costs, and regulations: the Laboratory has become ELAP-certified in additional tests to expand necessary services; the Laboratory has allowed a few ELAP certifications to elapse due to lack of customer need; the City’s fees for some tests are no longer in-line with industry averages; and the City’s fees for some tests do not align with cost-recovery estimates for labor and materials. It is important that laboratory costs are recovered equitably between all customer types and tests.

Analysis:

Public Works staff has conducted an updated Laboratory Fee Study in order to analyze cost recovery for Laboratory labor, capital, and material expenditures by individual test type and number, with methodology adapted from the 2010 fee study (Attachment 2). The cost recovery identified in the study is the actual costs to the City for a single test of that type, as determined by fixed costs shared across all test types, which are Laboratory operating overhead, administrative and sampling tasks, and capital equipment values, and variable costs for that specific test, which are labor hours and materials required.

As part of the study, staff also reviewed comparable laboratories, service and revenue projections, and Department needs in order to develop an updated set of laboratory tests and fees. The proposed individual service fees were determined based on time and methodology required, labor and materials costs, industry standards, and internal harmony with similar services. The full amended User Fee Schedule X. Laboratory Services is attached to the Resolution as Exhibit 1A.

The laboratory fees, along with other water and wastewater fees, will be reviewed as an item in the ongoing Utilities Rate Study 2024 scope of work. The City’s consultant may recommend further adjustments to the fee schedule as they evaluate the enterprise fund revenue and financial planning, which could be implemented following the Proposition 218 process.

The Department recommends that the new fee schedule be implemented on January 1, 2024. If approved, Public Works staff will conduct outreach to the Laboratory’s major customers to notify them of the changes in prices and available tests.

Fiscal Impact:

The updated fee schedule is projected to increase total test revenue by $30,000, which includes both external commercial customers and internal Water Treatment Plant and Wastewater Treatment Facility testing. The appropriate proportion of water and wastewater enterprise funding for laboratory operations for the following fiscal year is determined by the actual fees and number of tests conducted for each of the treatment plants, as well as the costs for other reporting and analytical support services provided by the Laboratory for each.

The laboratory fee schedule will be adjusted annually for inflation using the February Commercial Price Index, rounded to the nearest dollar.

Alternatives:

Only approve the addition of the new laboratory services and fees and deletion of non-certified services, and keep the laboratory rates for existing services as already adopted in the City’s Fiscal Year 23/24 fee schedule. This schedule is based solely on CPI increases on the 2010 fee study and does not account for the updated cost-recovery needs, alignment with competitor labs, or changes in Laboratory operations, which may impact revenue and customer numbers.

Recommendation:

Adopt a Resolution amending the Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services to update the fees for laboratory services for Fiscal Year 23/24.

Attachments:

1. Resolution - Laboratory Fee Schedule Update

2. Exhibit 1A - YC Fee Schedule FY 23-24 Proposed_X. Laboratory Services

3. Laboratory Fee Study Update 2023
Prepared By: Submitted By:

Scarlett O. Harris
Administrative Analyst II
Diana Langley
City Manager

ATTACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION NO. _________

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUBA CITY

AMENDING THE SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR LABORATORY SERVICES WHEREAS, the City’s Utilities Laboratory provides water and wastewater testing and analytical services to the Water Treatment Plant, Wastewater Treatment Facility, and external residential, utility, and municipal customers in accordance with the Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP); and
WHEREAS, on March 20, 2007, the City Council repealed and reenacted Chapter 8 of Title 3 of the Yuba City Municipal Code (User Fee Recovery System) and adopted Resolution No. 07-25 updating the Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services (User Fee Schedule); and WHEREAS, the User Fee Schedule is adjusted annually for inflationary changes and as needed for changes to services offered by the City; and
WHEREAS, the current fees charged for individual tests and analyses were established by Council in July 2010 following a fee study which evaluated the labor, materials, and time needed for each service in order to proportionately recover operational costs between the water enterprise fund, wastewater enterprise fund, and private customers; and WHEREAS, the Laboratory has gained ELAP certification on a number of new services which are not included in the current fee schedule and has allowed ELAP certification to lapse on unneeded tests which should subsequently be deleted from the public fee schedule; and WHEREAS, Public Works staff has reviewed User Fee Schedule Section X. Laboratory Services and conducted analysis on internal and external customer needs, cost recovery estimates, revenue projections, changes in techniques and equipment, and regional comparable laboratory charges to recommend more appropriate cost-recovery fees for existing and new services; and WHEREAS, the recommended changes to the User Fee Schedule are fair and reasonable for commercial and internal customers, provide appropriate cost recovery for the Laboratory operating budget, and require an amendment to the User Fee Schedule.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Yuba City as follows:

1. The City Council authorizes the Finance Director to amend the Section X. Laboratory Services of the User Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 23/24 as attached in Exhibit 1A and incorporated herein.

2. The City Council resolves that the amended User Fee Schedule for laboratory testing and analytical services shall take effect on January 1, 2024.

3. The City Council authorizes the Finance Director to apply the Consumer Price Index inflation factor for the month of February to Section X. Laboratory Services annually at the beginning of each fiscal year, rounded to the nearest dollar.

The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Yuba City at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of November, 2023.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
________________________________
Wade Kirchner, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Ciara Wakefield, Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
COUNSEL FOR YUBA CITY:
______________________________
Shannon L. Chaffin, City Attorney
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP
Exhibit:

A. Exhibit 1A – User Fee Schedule X. Laboratory Services

EXHIBIT 1A

Proposed per Staff Report
July 1, 2023 January 1, 2024
Feb 2023 CPI 6.0%
X. LABORATORY SERVICES
All subject to annual COLA using CPI per Council approval, November 7, 2023 Metals:

Metals by ICP/MS 33
Metals by ICP-OES (all 20 elements) 540 27
Dissolved Metals by ICP-OES (all 20 elements) 540
Metals by ICP-OES - CATIONS 101
Metals by ICP-OES - CATIONS - DISSOLVED 101
Metals Digestion for total determination 53 16
Metals Filtration for dissolved metals 17
Hardness as CaCO3, total by calculation 34 15
Microbiology:

Colilert Presence/Absence 51 49
Ten tube Total Coliform, drinking water 69 57
Ten tube Fecal Coliform, drinking water 27 24
15 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 81 62
15 Tubes Fecal Coliform, MPN/100ml 27 29
25 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 93 74
25 Tubes Fecal Coliform, MPN/100ml 34 38
MPN Quanti-Tray Method - Total Coliform 67 59
Heterotrophic Plate Count, (PP) 47 41
Inorganics:

Anions by IC, per analyte 47 47
Alkalinity, Total (as CaCO3) 46 39
Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 7
Carbonate Akalinity as CaCO3 7
Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 7
Electrical Conductivity 27 33
Free Chlorine Residual 26
Hardness as CaCO3, total by titration 63
Total Organic Carbon 50 116
Turbidity 39 33
Wet Chemistry:

Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 day 47 57
BOD, 5 Day Soluble 61 73
Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day 81 57
CBOD, 5 Day Soluble 61 73
Chemical Oxygen Demand 54 47
Chemical Oxygen Demand, Soluble 74 64
Ammonia as N 35 39
pH 27 27
Settleable Solids - 30 minute 27 32
Settleable Solids - 60 minute 27 32
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 42 55
Total Dissolved Solids - Fixed 35 55
Total Dissolved Solids - Inorganic form 35
Total Dissolved Volatile Solids 35 55
Total Solids (TS) 31 44
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 31 41
Volatile Solids 27 12
Volatile Suspended Solids 27 11
Volatile Acids 48
Sample Handling:

Sample Filtering for dissolved or soluble 13
Turn-Around-Time (TAT) Pricing Multipliers:

Standard TAT (10 Business Days) 1.0x 1.0x
5 Business Days 1.5x 1.5x
48 Hours 2.0x 2.0x
24 Hours 3.0x 3.0x
City of Yuba City Fee Schedule

ATTACHMENT 2

Lead Author:

Scarlett Harris | Administrative Analyst II – Utilities City of Yuba City | Public Works Department
302 Burns Drive | Yuba City, CA 95991
Phone (530) 822-3264 Ext. 3301 | Fax (530) 822-4773 | [email protected] Laboratory Fee Study
Update 2023
City of Yuba City
Public Works Department

November 7, 2023
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council,
The City of Yuba City owns and operates the only full-service State of California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP)-certified laboratory in the Yuba-Sutter region. The Public Works Department submits the attached fee and cost-recovery analysis for the City’s water and wastewater laboratory services provided by the Laboratory Division, including a proposed laboratory fee schedule. This in-house study has been conducted in a collaborative effort by Public Works Administration and Laboratory staff.

The study has adapted the methodology of the laboratory fee study conducted in 2010 by Inflection Point Solutions of Overland Park, KS, as adopted by City Council on June 15, 2010, in order to evaluate the current cost recovery for each test provided by the Laboratory Division. Cost recovery has been estimated through both fixed costs across all tests, derived from operating overhead, administration, and equipment, and variable costs dependent upon the individual test, derived from the necessary labor and materials. The study also considers changes in technique and equipment, the Laboratory’s current ELAP certifications and expanded or reduced services, and industry standards in comparable regional commercial laboratories.

Study Table of Contents:

I. Laboratory Fee Schedule
II. Cost Recovery per Test
III. Projected Revenue per Test
IV. Projected Revenue per Test – Top 10 Most Commonly Requested V. Commercial Lab Survey
VI. Commercial Lab Survey – Top 10 Most Commonly Requested VII. Laboratory Fee Study Cost Summary
VIII. Overhead Cost Detail
IX. Administrative Cost Detail
X. Equipment Utilized for Testing Cost Detail
XI. Labor Cost Detail
XII. Materials Cost Detail
The Department recommends that the proposed fee schedule be implemented on January 1, 2024, in order to best secure cost recovery for laboratory services from commercial, water, and wastewater customers. I submit this study on behalf of the Public Works Department, in the belief that it is an accurate and appropriate fiscal analysis of the laboratory services provided by the City of Yuba City.

Sincerely,
Scarlett O. Harris
Administrative Analyst II – Utilities

Laboratory Fee Schedule Adopted
Line No. Type of Test Pre-2010 2010 FY 23/24 Proposed Delta (%) 1 Metals:

NEW Metals by ICP/MS $ 33.00
2 Metals by ICP-OES (all 20 elements) (individual) $ 400.00 200.00 $ 540.00 $ 27.00 $ 0.00% 3 Dissolved Metals by ICP=OES (all 20 elements) $ 400.00 225.00 $ $ 540.00 4 Metals by ICP-OES - CATIONS $ 75.00 50.00 $ $ 101.00
5 Metals by ICP-OES - CATIONS - DISSSOLVED $ 75.00 75.00 $ $ 101.00 6 Arsenic by graphite furnace $ 53.00 15.00 $
7 Lead by graphite furnace $ 53.00 15.00 $
8 Metals Digestion for total determination 25.00 $ 39.00 $ 53.00 $ 16.00 $ -69.81% NEW Metals Filtration for dissolved metals $ 17.00
9 Hardness as CaCO3 total by calculation* 25.00 $ 25.00 $ 34.00 $ 15.00 $ -55.88% 10 Microbiology:
11 Colilert Presence / Absence 25.00 $ 38.00 $ 51.00 $ 49.00 $ -3.92% 12 Ten tube Total Coliform, drinking water 30.00 $ 51.00 $ 69.00 $ 57.00 $ -17.39% 13 Ten tube Fecal Coliform, drinking water 10.00 $ 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 24.00 $ -11.11% 14 15 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 35.00 $ 60.00 $ 81.00 $ 62.00 $ -23.46% 15 15 Tubes Fecal Coliform, MPN/100ml 10.00 $ 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 29.00 $ 7.41% 16 25 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 45.00 $ 69.00 $ 93.00 $ 74.00 $ -20.43% 17 25 Tubes Fecal Coliform, MPN/100ml 15.00 $ 25.00 $ 34.00 $ 38.00 $ 11.76% 18 MPN Quanti-Tray Method - E-coli $ 35.00 25.00 $
19 MPN Quanti-Tray Method - Total Coliform/E. Coli $ 50.00 25.00 $ 67.00 $ 59.00 $ -11.94% 20 Heterotrophic Plate Count, (PP) 35.00 $ 35.00 $ 47.00 $ 41.00 $ -12.77% 21 Inorganics:
22 Anions by IC (per element) 35.00 $ 35.00 $ 47.00 $ 47.00 $ 0.00% 23 Acidity, Total (CaCO3) $ 25.00 15.00 $
24 Alkalinity, Total (as CaCO3) 15.00 $ 34.00 $ 46.00 $ 39.00 $ -15.22% NEW Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 $ 7.00
NEW Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 $ 7.00
NEW Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 $ 7.00
25 Color examination of water $ 25.00 15.00 $
26 Electrical Conductivity 10.00 $ 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 33.00 $ 22.22% 27 Free Chlorine Residual $ 19.00 10.00 $ $ 26.00
28 Hardness as CaCO3, total by titration $ 47.00 15.00 $ $ 63.00 29 Total Organic Carbon - $ 37.00 $ 50.00 $ 116.00 $ 132.00% 30 Dissolved Organic Carbon $ 46.00 - $
31 Turbidity 15.00 $ 29.00 $ 39.00 $ 33.00 $ -15.38%
32 Wet Chemistry:
33 Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day 30.00 $ 35.00 $ 47.00 $ 57.00 $ 21.28% 34 BOD, 5 Day Soluble 35.00 $ 45.00 $ 61.00 $ 73.00 $ 19.67% 35 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day 30.00 $ 60.00 $ 81.00 $ 57.00 $ -29.63% 36 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day Sol. 35.00 $ 45.00 $ 61.00 $ 73.00 $ 19.67% 37 Chemical Oxygen Demand 40.00 $ 40.00 $ 54.00 $ 47.00 $ -12.96% 38 Chemical Oxygen Demand, Soluble 45.00 $ 55.00 $ 74.00 $ 64.00 $ -13.51% 39 Ammonia as N 20.00 $ 26.00 $ 35.00 $ 39.00 $ 11.43%
40 Odor examination of water $ 42.00 40.00 $
41 Odor examination of water - Dechlorinated $ 50.00 40.00 $ 42 pH 10.00 $ 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 27.00 $ 0.00%
43 Settleable Solids - 30 minute 10.00 $ 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 32.00 $ 18.52% 44 Settleable Solids - 60 minute 10.00 $ 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 32.00 $ 18.52% 45 Total Dissolved Solids 15.00 $ 31.00 $ 42.00 $ 55.00 $ 30.95% 46 Total Dissolved Solids - Fixed 25.00 $ 26.00 $ 35.00 $ 55.00 $ 57.14% 47 Total Dissolved Solids - Inorganic form $ 26.00 25.00 $ $ 35.00 48 Total Dissolved Volatile Solids 20.00 $ 26.00 $ 35.00 $ 55.00 $ 57.14% 49 Total Solids 15.00 $ 23.00 $ 31.00 $ 44.00 $ 41.94%
50 Tot. Suspended Solids 15.00 $ 23.00 $ 31.00 $ 41.00 $ 32.26% 51 Volatile Solids 15.00 $ 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 12.00 $ -55.56% 52 Volatile Suspended Solids 15.00 $ 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 11.00 $ -59.26% NEW Volatile Acids $ 48.00
53 Sample Handling:
54 Sample Filtering for dissolved or soluble $ 10.00 $ 13.00 55 Turn-Around-Time (TAT) Pricing Multipliers:
56 Standard TAT (10 business days) 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x
57 5 business days 1.5x 1.5x 1.5x
58 48 hours 2.0x 2.0x 2.0x
59 24 hours 3.0x 3.0x 3.0x

Laboratory Fee Schedule - Cost Recovery per Test Adopted Line No. Type of Test Number of Tests in FY 22/23 Fixed Costs per Test Variable Labor per Test Variable Materials per Test Study Cost per Test FY 23/24 Proposed 1 Metals:

NEW Metals by ICP/MS 570 27.92 $ 3.74 $ 1.11 $ 32.78 $ 33.00 $ 0.22 $ 29.26 $ (3.52) $ 2 Metals by ICP-OES (all 20 elements) 131 27.92 $ 3.18 $ 0.85 $ 31.95 $ 27.00 $ 27.00 $ (4.95) $ (4.95) $ 26.08 $ (5.87) $ 8 Metals Digestion for total determination 22 6.98 $ 4.77 $ 2.04 $ 13.79 $ 53.00 $ 16.00 $ 39.21 $ 2.21 $ 16.96 $ 3.17 $ NEW Metals Filtration for dissolved metals 0 6.98 $ 6.36 $ 1.25 $ 14.59 $ 17.00 $ 2.41 $ 23.74 $ 9.15 $ 9 Hardness as CaCO3 total by calculation 34 6.98 $ 6.36 $ - $ 13.34 $ 34.00 $ 15.00 $ 20.66 $ 1.66 $ 42.67 $ 29.32 $ 10 Microbiology:11 Colilert Presence / Absence 2215 27.92 $ 6.36 $ 9.47 $ 43.75 $ 51.00 $ 49.00 $ 7.25 $ 5.25 $ 43.20 $ (0.56) $ 12 Ten tube Total Coliform, drinking water 0 27.92 $ 12.73 $ 10.35 $ 50.99 $ 69.00 $ 57.00 $ 18.01 $ 6.01 $ 46.11 $ (4.88) $ 13 Ten tube Fecal Coliform, drinking water 0- $ 12.73 $ 8.72 $ 21.45 $ 27.00 $ 24.00 $ 5.55 $ 2.55 $ 42.40 $ 20.95 $ 14 15 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 683 27.92 $ 12.73 $ 15.52 $ 56.17 $ 81.00 $ 62.00 $ 24.83 $ 5.83 $ 58.72 $ 2.56 $ 15 15 Tubes Fecal Coliform, MPN/100ml 57 - $ 12.73 $ 13.08 $ 25.81 $ 27.00 $ 29.00 $ 1.19 $ 3.19 $ 66.78 $ 40.97 $ 16 25 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 0 27.92 $ 12.73 $ 25.87 $ 66.51 $ 93.00 $ 74.00 $ 26.49 $ 7.49 $ 79.24 $ 12.72 $ 17 25 Tubes Fecal Coliform, MPN/100ml 0 - $ 12.73 $ 21.80 $ 34.53 $ 34.00 $ 38.00 $ (0.53) $ 3.47 $ 106.00 $ 71.47 $ 19 MPN Quanti-Tray Method - Total Coliform 399 27.92 $ 12.73 $ 12.73 $ 53.38 $ 67.00 $ 59.00 $ 13.62 $ 5.62 $ 53.85 $ 0.47 $ 20 Heterotrophic Plate Count, (PP) 231 27.92 $ 11.14 $ 1.78 $ 40.84 $ 47.00 $ 41.00 $ 6.16 $ 0.16 $ 63.60 $ 22.76 $ 21 Inorganics:22 Anions by IC (per element) 511 27.92 $ 15.91 $ 7.03 $ 50.86 $ 47.00 $ 47.00 $ (3.86) $ (3.86) $ 41.87 $ (8.99) $ 24 Alkalinity, Total (as CaCO3) 675 27.92 $ 7.95 $ 2.71 $ 38.58 $ 46.00 $ 39.00 $ 7.42 $ 0.42 $ 33.92 $ (4.66) $ NEW Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 18 - $ 6.36 $ - $ 6.36 $ 7.00 $ 0.64 $ NEW Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 18 - $ 6.36 $ - $ 6.36 $ 7.00 $ 0.64 $ NEW Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 18 - $ 6.36 $ - $ 6.36 $ 7.00 $ 0.64 $ 26 Electrical Conductivity 1902 27.92 $ 3.18 $ 1.40 $ 32.50 $ 27.00 $ 33.00 $ (5.50) $ 0.50 $ 26.08 $ (6.42) $ 29 Total Organic Carbon 53 27.92 $ 31.82 $ 55.99 $ 115.72 $ 50.00 $ 116.00 $ (65.72) $ 0.28 $ 68.48 $ (47.25) $ 31 Turbidity 900 27.92 $ 4.77 $ - $ 32.69 $ 39.00 $ 33.00 $ 6.31 $ 0.31 $ 26.08 $ (6.62) $ 32 Wet Chemistry:33 Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day 1361 27.92 $ 15.91 $ 7.23 $ 51.06 $ 47.00 $ 57.00 $ (4.06) $ 5.94 $ 59.57 $ 8.51 $ 34 BOD, 5 Day Soluble 0 27.92 $ 15.91 $ 7.39 $ 65.81 $ 61.00 $ 73.00 $ (4.81) $ 7.19 $ 103.88 $ 38.07 $ 35 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day 141 27.92 $ 15.91 $ 7.50 $ 51.33 $ 81.00 $ 57.00 $ 29.67 $ 5.67 $ 70.76 $ 19.43 $ 36 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day Sol. 0 27.92 $ 15.91 $ 7.66 $ 66.08 $ 61.00 $ 73.00 $ (5.08) $ 6.92 $ 119.78 $ 53.70 $ 37 Chemical Oxygen Demand 1270 27.92 $ 12.73 $ 1.68 $ 42.33 $ 54.00 $ 47.00 $ 11.67 $ 4.67 $ 60.21 $ 17.88 $ 38 Chemical Oxygen Demand, Soluble 59 27.92 $ 12.73 $ 2.10 $ 57.34 $ 74.00 $ 64.00 $ 16.66 $ 6.66 $ 69.96 $ 12.62 $ 39 Ammonia as N 754 27.92 $ 6.36 $ 1.16 $ 35.44 $ 35.00 $ 39.00 $ (0.44) $ 3.56 $ 51.41 $ 15.97 $ 42 pH 2009 27.92 $ 2.12 $ 0.65 $ 30.69 $ 27.00 $ 27.00 $ (3.69) $ (3.69) $ 24.12 $ (6.57) $ 43 Settleable Solids - 30 minute 357 27.92 $ 3.98 $ - $ 31.90 $ 27.00 $ 32.00 $ (4.90) $ 0.10 $ 40.55 $ 8.65 $ 44 Settleable Solids - 60 minute 1523 27.92 $ 3.98 $ - $ 31.90 $ 27.00 $ 32.00 $ (4.90) $ 0.10 $ 37.74 $ 5.84 $ 45 Total Dissolved Solids 130 27.92 $ 25.45 $ 1.75 $ 55.12 $ 42.00 $ 55.00 $ (13.12) $ (0.12) $ 41.98 $ (13.15) $ 46 Total Dissolved Solids - Fixed 0 27.92 $ 25.45 $ 1.75 $ 55.12 $ 35.00 $ 55.00 $ (20.12) $ (0.12) $ 73.14 $ 18.02 $ 48 Total Dissolved Volatile Solids 0 27.92 $ 25.45 $ 1.75 $ 55.12 $ 35.00 $ 55.00 $ (20.12) $ (0.12) $ 72.08 $ 16.96 $ 49 Total Solids 356 27.92 $ 15.91 $ - $ 43.83 $ 31.00 $ 44.00 $ (12.83) $ 0.17 $ 35.78 $ (8.05) $ 50 Tot. Suspended Solids 3815 27.92 $ 7.95 $ 0.55 $ 36.42 $ 31.00 $ 41.00 $ (5.42) $ 4.58 $ 37.95 $ 1.53 $ 51 Volatile Solids 322 6.98 $ 3.18 $ - $ 10.16 $ 27.00 $ 12.00 $ 16.84 $ 1.84 $ 49.56 $ 39.39 $ 52 Volatile Suspended Solids 908 6.98 $ 2.12 $ - $ 9.10 $ 27.00 $ 11.00 $ 17.90 $ 1.90 $ 52.58 $ 43.48 $ NEW Volatile Acids 307 27.92 $ 11.93 $ 7.84 $ 47.69 $ 48.00 $ 0.31 $ 100.70 $ 53.01 $ 55 Turn-Around-Time (TAT) Pricing Multipliers:56 Standard TAT (10 business days) 1.0x57 5 business days 1.5x58 48 hours 2.0x59 24 hours 3.0x Cost Recovery Delta (Adopted & Study)
Cost Recovery Delta (Proposed & Study)
Cost Recovery Delta (Commercial & Study)
Commercial Mean + 6%

Laboratory Fee Schedule - Projected Revenue per Test Adopted Line No. Type of Test Number of Tests in FY 22/23 Study Cost per Test FY 23/24 Proposed Commercial 1 Metals:

NEW Metals by ICP/MS 570 32.78 $ 18,681.92 $ - $ 33.00 $ 18,810.00 $ 29.26 $ 16,675.92 $ 2 Metals by ICP-OES (all 20 elements) 131 31.95 $ 4,185.45 $ 27.00 $ 3,537.00 $ 27.00 $ 3,537.00 $ 26.08 $ 3,415.96 $ 8 Metals Digestion for total determination 22 13.79 $ 303.39 $ 53.00 $ 1,166.00 $ 16.00 $ 352.00 $ 16.96 $ 373.12 $ NEW Metals Filtration for dissolved metals 0 14.59 $ - $ - $ 17.00 $ - $ 23.74 $ - $ 9 Hardness as CaCO3 total by calculation 34 13.34 $ 453.66 $ 34.00 $ 1,156.00 $ 15.00 $ 510.00 $ 42.67 $ 1,450.61 $ 10 Microbiology:11 Colilert Presence / Absence 2215 43.75 $ 96,912.90 $ 51.00 $ 112,965.00 $ 49.00 $ 108,535.00 $ 43.20 $ 95,676.93 $ 12 Ten tube Total Coliform, drinking water 0 50.99 $ - $ 69.00 $ - $ 57.00 $ - $ 46.11 $ - $ 13 Ten tube Fecal Coliform, drinking water 0 21.45 $ - $ 27.00 $ - $ 24.00 $ - $ 42.40 $ - $ 14 15 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 683 56.17 $ 38,361.38 $ 81.00 $ 55,323.00 $ 62.00 $ 42,346.00 $ 58.72 $ 40,108.49 $ 15 15 Tubes Fecal Coliform, MPN/100ml 57 25.81 $ 1,470.94 $ 27.00 $ 1,539.00 $ 29.00 $ 1,653.00 $ 66.78 $ 3,806.46 $ 16 25 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 0 66.51 $ - $ 93.00 $ - $ 74.00 $ - $ 79.24 $ - $ 17 25 Tubes Fecal Coliform, MPN/100ml 0 34.53 $ - $ 34.00 $ - $ 38.00 $ - $ 106.00 $ - $ 19 MPN Quanti-Tray Method - Total Coliform 399 53.38 $ 21,297.02 $ 67.00 $ 26,733.00 $ 59.00 $ 23,541.00 $ 53.85 $ 21,485.35 $ 20 Heterotrophic Plate Count, (PP) 231 40.84 $ 9,433.64 $ 47.00 $ 10,857.00 $ 41.00 $ 9,471.00 $ 63.60 $ 14,691.60 $ 21 Inorganics:22 Anions by IC (per element) 511 50.86 $ 25,988.18 $ 47.00 $ 24,017.00 $ 47.00 $ 24,017.00 $ 41.87 $ 21,395.57 $ 24 Alkalinity, Total (as CaCO3) 675 38.58 $ 26,042.91 $ 46.00 $ 31,050.00 $ 39.00 $ 26,325.00 $ 33.92 $ 22,896.00 $ NEW Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 18 6.36 $ 114.53 $ - $ 7.00 $ 126.00 $ - $ NEW Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 18 6.36 $ 114.53 $ - $ 7.00 $ 126.00 $ - $ NEW Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 18 6.36 $ 114.53 $ - $ 7.00 $ 126.00 $ - $ 26 Electrical Conductivity 1902 32.50 $ 61,813.10 $ 27.00 $ 51,354.00 $ 33.00 $ 62,766.00 $ 26.08 $ 49,596.55 $ 29 Total Organic Carbon 53 115.72 $ 6,133.25 $ 50.00 $ 2,650.00 $ 116.00 $ 6,148.00 $ 68.48 $ 3,629.23 $ 31 Turbidity 900 32.69 $ 29,423.03 $ 39.00 $ 35,100.00 $ 33.00 $ 29,700.00 $ 26.08 $ 23,468.40 $ 32 Wet Chemistry:33 Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day 1361 51.06 $ 69,492.66 $ 47.00 $ 63,967.00 $ 57.00 $ 77,577.00 $ 59.57 $ 81,077.49 $ 34 BOD, 5 Day Soluble 0 65.81 $ - $ 61.00 $ - $ 73.00 $ - $ 103.88 $ - $ 35 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day 141 51.33 $ 7,237.35 $ 81.00 $ 11,421.00 $ 57.00 $ 8,037.00 $ 70.76 $ 9,976.46 $ 36 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day Sol. 0 66.08 $ - $ 61.00 $ - $ 73.00 $ - $ 119.78 $ - $ 37 Chemical Oxygen Demand 1270 42.33 $ 53,754.02 $ 54.00 $ 68,580.00 $ 47.00 $ 59,690.00 $ 60.21 $ 76,464.16 $ 38 Chemical Oxygen Demand, Soluble 59 57.34 $ 3,382.80 $ 74.00 $ 4,366.00 $ 64.00 $ - $ 69.96 $ 4,127.64 $ 39 Ammonia as N 754 35.44 $ 26,724.52 $ 35.00 $ 26,390.00 $ 39.00 $ 29,406.00 $ 51.41 $ 38,763.14 $ 42 pH 2009 30.69 $ 61,651.52 $ 27.00 $ 54,243.00 $ 27.00 $ 54,243.00 $ 24.12 $ 48,447.04 $ 43 Settleable Solids - 30 minute 357 31.90 $ 11,387.18 $ 27.00 $ 9,639.00 $ 32.00 $ 11,424.00 $ 40.55 $ 14,474.57 $ 44 Settleable Solids - 60 minute 1523 31.90 $ 48,578.94 $ 27.00 $ 41,121.00 $ 32.00 $ 48,736.00 $ 37.74 $ 57,471.93 $ 45 Total Dissolved Solids 130 55.12 $ 7,165.86 $ 42.00 $ 5,460.00 $ 55.00 $ 7,150.00 $ 41.98 $ 5,456.88 $ 46 Total Dissolved Solids - Fixed 0 55.12 $ - $ 35.00 $ - $ 55.00 $ - $ 73.14 $ - $ 48 Total Dissolved Volatile Solids 0 55.12 $ - $ 35.00 $ - $ 55.00 $ - $ 72.08 $ - $ 49 Total Solids 356 43.83 $ 15,602.59 $ 31.00 $ 11,036.00 $ 44.00 $ 15,664.00 $ 35.78 $ 12,735.90 $ 50 Tot. Suspended Solids 3815 36.42 $ 138,942.30 $ 31.00 $ 118,265.00 $ 41.00 $ 156,415.00 $ 37.95 $ 144,771.62 $ 51 Volatile Solids 322 10.16 $ 3,272.00 $ 27.00 $ 8,694.00 $ 12.00 $ 3,864.00 $ 49.56 $ 15,956.71 $ 52 Volatile Suspended Solids 908 9.10 $ 8,263.71 $ 27.00 $ 24,516.00 $ 11.00 $ 9,988.00 $ 52.58 $ 47,739.01 $ NEW Volatile Acids 307 47.69 $ 14,640.25 $ - $ 48.00 $ 14,736.00 $ 100.70 $ 30,914.90 $ Total: 810,940.08 $ 805,145.00 $ 855,019.00 $ 907,047.62 $ Net Revenue: $ 44,078.92 (5,795.08) $ 96,107.54 $
Projected Annual Revenue (Current)
Projected Annual Revenue (Proposed)
Projected Cost Recovery Needed
Projected Annual Revenue (Commercial)

Top 10 Most Commonly Requested Tests by Regional Customer s
2023 Estimates
Commonly Requested Test
1 Total Suspended Solids 3,815 31.00 $ 118,265.00 $ 41.00 $ 156,415.00 $ 2 Colilert Presence / Absence 2,215 51.00 $ 112,965.00 $ 49.00 $ 108,535.00 $ 3 pH 1,972 27.00 $ 53,244.00 $ 27.00 $ 53,244.00 $ 4 Electrical Conductivity 1,831 27.00 $ 49,437.00 $ 33.00 $ 60,423.00 $ 5 Settleable Solids - 60 minute 1,523 27.00 $ 41,121.00 $ 32.00 $ 48,736.00 $ 6 Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day 1,361 47.00 $ 63,967.00 $ 57.00 $ 77,577.00 $ 7 Chemical Oxygen Demand 1,270 54.00 $ 68,580.00 $ 47.00 $ 59,690.00 $ 8 Volatile Suspended Solids 908 27.00 $ 24,516.00 $ 11.00 $ 9,988.00 $ 9 Turbidity 900 39.00 $ 35,100.00 $ 33.00 $ 29,700.00 $ 10 15 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 683 81.00 $ 55,323.00 $ 62.00 $ 42,346.00 $ Totals: 16,478 622,518.00 $ 646,654.00 $
2010 Study
Commonly Requested Test
1 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) 856 35.00 $ 29,960.00 $ 2 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 530 23.00 $ 12,190.00 $ 3 Ammonia 289 26.00 $ 7,514.00 $ 4 10 tube MPN total and fecal bacteria 175 51.00 $ 8,925.00 $ 5 15 tube MPN total and fecal bacteria 330 60.00 $ 19,800.00 $ 6 25 tube MPN total and fecal bacteria 57 69.00 $ 3,933.00 $ 7 Quanti-tray MPN rapid bacteria determination 9 50.00 $ 450.00 $ 8 Colilert Drinking water bacteria 628 38.00 $ 23,864.00 $ 9 Anions (typically nitrate only) 439 35.00 $ 15,365.00 $ 10 Trace metals 304 50.00 $ 15,200.00 $
Totals: 3,617 137,201.00 $
No. of Tests Ordered in FY 22/23
Est. Revenue at Proposed Prices
Current Prices (FY 23/24)
Est. Revenue at Current Prices
No. of Tests Ordered in FY 09/10
FY 10/11 Updated Prices
Est. Revenue for FY 10/11
Proposed Prices

Laboratory Fee Schedule - Commercial Lab Survey
Line No. Type of Test 2010 Caltest CLS Pace FGL Alpha Labs Proposed 1 Metals:

NEW Metals by ICP/MS $ 20.00 42.00 $ 24.00 $ 30.00 $ 22.00 $ 27.60 $ 29.26 $ NEW NEW $ (3.74) 33.00 $ -11% 2 Metals by ICP-OES (all 20 elements) $ 540.00 400.00 $ 27.00 $ 20.00 $ 24.00 $ 30.00 $ 22.00 $ 24.60 $ 26.08 $ (0.92) $ -4% 27.00 $ (0.92) $ -3% 3 Dissolved Metals by ICP=OES (all 20 elements) 400.00 $ $ 540.00 DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE 4 Metals by ICP-OES - CATIONS $ 75.00 $ 101.00 DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE5 Metals by ICP-OES - CATIONS - DISSSOLVED $ 75.00 $ 101.00 DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE6 Arsenic by graphite furnace $ 53.00 DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE7 Lead by graphite furnace $ 53.00 DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE8 Metals Digestion for total determination 39.00 $ 53.00 $ 32.00 $ 10.00 $ 17.00 $ 5.00 $ 16.00 $ 16.96 $ (36.04) $ -213% 16.00 $ 0.96 $ 6% NEW Metals Filtration for dissolved metals $ 5.00 51.00 $ 19.00 $ 27.00 $ 10.00 $ 22.40 $ 23.74 $ NEW NEW $ 6.74 17.00 $ 40% 9 Hardness as CaCO3 total by calculation 25.00 $ 34.00 $ 43.00 $ 35.00 $ 48.00 $ 35.00 $ 40.25 $ 42.67 $ 8.67 $ 20% 15.00 $ 27.67 $ 184% 10 Microbiology:11 Colilert Presence / Absence 38.00 $ 51.00 $ 50.00 $ 30.00 $ 48.00 $ 35.00 $ 40.75 $ 43.20 $ (7.81) $ -18% 49.00 $ (5.81) $ -12% 12 Ten tube Total Coliform, drinking water $ 69.00 51.00 $ 35.00 $ 58.00 $ 41.00 $ 40.00 $ 43.50 $ 46.11 $ (22.89) $ -50% 57.00 $ (10.89) $ -19% 13 Ten tube Fecal Coliform, drinking water $ 27.00 20.00 $ 40.00 $ 40.00 $ 42.40 $ 15.40 $ 36% 24.00 $ 18.40 $ 77% 14 15 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 60.00 $ 81.00 $ 81.00 $ 43.00 $ 65.00 $ 48.00 $ 40.00 $ 55.40 $ 58.72 $ (22.28) $ -38% 62.00 $ (3.28) $ -5% 15 15 Tubes Fecal Coliform, MPN/100ml 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 86.00 $ 40.00 $ 63.00 $ 66.78 $ 39.78 $ 60% 29.00 $ 37.78 $ 130% 16 25 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 69.00 $ 93.00 $ 53.00 $ 84.00 $ 62.00 $ 100.00 $ 74.75 $ 79.24 $ (13.77) $ -17% 74.00 $ 5.24 $ 7% 17 25 Tubes Fecal Coliform, MPN/100ml 25.00 $ 34.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 106.00 $ 72.00 $ 68% 38.00 $ 68.00 $ 179% 18 MPN Quanti-Tray Method - E-coli $ 35.00 DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE 19 MPN Quanti-Tray Method - Total Coliform 50.00 $ 67.00 $ 65.00 $ 35.00 $ 62.00 $ 32.00 $ 60.00 $ 50.80 $ 53.85 $ (13.15) $ -24% 59.00 $ (5.15) $ -9% 20 Heterotrophic Plate Count, (PP) 35.00 $ 47.00 $ 55.00 $ 38.00 $ 84.00 $ 48.00 $ 75.00 $ 60.00 $ 63.60 $ 16.60 $ 26% 41.00 $ 22.60 $ 55% 21 Inorganics:22 Anions by IC (per element) 35.00 $ 47.00 $ 64.00 $ 22.00 $ 42.00 $ 30.00 $ 39.50 $ 41.87 $ (5.13) $ -12% 47.00 $ (5.13) $ -11% 23 Acidity, Total (CaCO3) $ 25.00 DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE 24 Alkalinity, Total (as CaCO3) 34.00 $ 46.00 $ 43.00 $ 31.00 $ 32.00 $ 32.00 $ 22.00 $ 32.00 $ 33.92 $ (12.08) $ -36% 39.00 $ (5.08) $ -13% NEW Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 NEW NEW $ 7.00NEW Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 NEW NEW $ 7.00NEW Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 NEW NEW $ 7.00 25 Color examination of water $ 25.00 DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE 26 Electrical Conductivity 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 38.00 $ 16.00 $ 27.00 $ 32.00 $ 10.00 $ 24.60 $ 26.08 $ (0.92) $ -4% 33.00 $ (6.92) $ -21% 27 Free Chlorine Residual $ 19.00 $ 26.00 DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE 28 Hardness as CaCO3, total by titration $ 47.00 $ 63.00 DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE29 Total Organic Carbon 37.00 $ 50.00 $ 92.00 $ 46.00 $ 70.00 $ 70.00 $ 45.00 $ 64.60 $ 68.48 $ 18.48 $ 27% 116.00 $ (47.52) $ -41% 30 Dissolved Organic Carbon $ 46.00 DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE 31 Turbidity 29.00 $ 39.00 $ 38.00 $ 16.00 $ 32.00 $ 27.00 $ 10.00 $ 24.60 $ 26.08 $ (12.92) $ -50% 33.00 $ (6.92) $ -21% 32 Wet Chemistry:33 Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day $ 47.00 35.00 $ 64.00 $ 46.00 $ 72.00 $ 54.00 $ 45.00 $ 56.20 $ 59.57 $ 12.57 $ 21% 57.00 $ 2.57 $ 5% 34 BOD, 5 Day Soluble 45.00 $ 61.00 $ 98.00 $ 98.00 $ 103.88 $ 42.88 $ 41% 73.00 $ 30.88 $ 42%35 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day $ 81.00 60.00 $ 81.00 $ 77.00 $ 59.00 $ 50.00 $ 66.75 $ 70.76 $ (10.25) $ -14% 57.00 $ 13.76 $ 24%36 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day Sol. 45.00 $ 61.00 $ 113.00 $ 113.00 $ 119.78 $ 58.78 $ 49% 73.00 $ 46.78 $ 64%37 Chemical Oxygen Demand 40.00 $ 54.00 $ 67.00 $ 46.00 $ 72.00 $ 54.00 $ 45.00 $ 56.80 $ 60.21 $ 6.21 $ 10% 47.00 $ 13.21 $ 28% 38 Chemical Oxygen Demand, Soluble 55.00 $ 74.00 $ 67.00 $ 65.00 $ 66.00 $ 69.96 $ (4.04) $ -6% 64.00 $ 5.96 $ 9% 39 Ammonia as N 26.00 $ 35.00 $ 51.00 $ 46.00 $ 52.00 $ 45.00 $ 48.50 $ 51.41 $ 16.41 $ 32% 39.00 $ 12.41 $ 32% 40 Odor examination of water $ 42.00 DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE 41 Odor examination of water - Dechlorinated $ 50.00 DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE42 pH 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 38.00 $ 16.00 $ 27.00 $ 10.00 $ 22.75 $ 24.12 $ (2.89) $ -12% 27.00 $ (2.89) $ -11% 43 Settleable Solids - 30 minute 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 60.00 $ 30.00 $ 31.00 $ 32.00 $ 38.25 $ 40.55 $ 13.55 $ 33% 32.00 $ 8.55 $ 27% 44 Settleable Solids - 60 minute 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 60.00 $ 30.00 $ 31.00 $ 32.00 $ 25.00 $ 35.60 $ 37.74 $ 10.74 $ 28% 32.00 $ 5.74 $ 18% 45 Total Dissolved Solids 31.00 $ 42.00 $ 60.00 $ 30.00 $ 41.00 $ 32.00 $ 35.00 $ 39.60 $ 41.98 $ (0.02) $ 0% 55.00 $ (13.02) $ -24% 46 Total Dissolved Solids - Fixed 26.00 $ 35.00 $ 103.00 $ 54.00 $ 50.00 $ 69.00 $ 73.14 $ 38.14 $ 52% 55.00 $ 18.14 $ 33% 47 Total Dissolved Solids - Inorganic form $ 26.00 $ 35.00 DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE 48 Total Dissolved Volatile Solids 26.00 $ 35.00 $ 103.00 $ 51.00 $ 50.00 $ 68.00 $ 72.08 $ 37.08 $ 51% 55.00 $ 17.08 $ 31% 49 Total Solids 23.00 $ 31.00 $ 38.00 $ 30.00 $ 37.00 $ 30.00 $ 33.75 $ 35.78 $ 4.78 $ 13% 44.00 $ (8.23) $ -19% 50 Tot. Suspended Solids 23.00 $ 31.00 $ 43.00 $ 35.00 $ 41.00 $ 32.00 $ 28.00 $ 35.80 $ 37.95 $ 6.95 $ 18% 41.00 $ (3.05) $ -7% 51 Volatile Solids 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 55.00 $ 35.00 $ 47.00 $ 50.00 $ 46.75 $ 49.56 $ 22.56 $ 46% 12.00 $ 37.56 $ 313% 52 Volatile Suspended Solids 20.00 $ 27.00 $ 55.00 $ 44.00 $ 51.00 $ 48.00 $ 50.00 $ 49.60 $ 52.58 $ 25.58 $ 49% 11.00 $ 41.58 $ 378% NEW Volatile Acids $ 95.00 95.00 $ 100.70 $ NEW NEW $ 52.70 48.00 $ 110% 53 Sample Handling:54 Sample Filtering for dissolved or soluble $ 10.00 $ 13.00 55 Turn-Around-Time (TAT) Pricing Multipliers:56 Standard TAT (10 business days) 1.0x 1.0x57 5 business days 1.5x 1.5x 58 48 hours 2.0x 2.0x59 24 hours 3.0x 3.0x
Delta from Mean($)
Delta from Mean (%)
Competitor Mean
Delta from Mean (%)
Adopted FY 23/24
Competitor Mean + 6%
Delta from Mean ($)

Commercial Lab Comparisons
Fiscal Year 22/23
Commonly Requested Test Caltest FGL Alpha Labs
1 Total Suspended Solids 31.00 $ 41.00 $ 43.00 $ 35.00 $ 41.00 $ 32.00 $ 28.00 $ $ -18% 8% 37.95 2 Colilert Presence / Absence 51.00 $ 49.00 $ 50.00 $ 30.00 $ 48.00 $ 35.00 $ $ 18% 13% 43.20 3 pH 27.00 $ 27.00 $ 38.00 $ 16.00 $ 27.00 $ 10.00 $ $ 12% 12% 24.12 4 Electrical Conductivity 27.00 $ 33.00 $ 38.00 $ 16.00 $ 27.00 $ 32.00 $ 10.00 $ $ 4% 27% 26.08 5 Settleable Solids - 60 minute 27.00 $ 32.00 $ 60.00 $ 30.00 $ 31.00 $ 32.00 $ 25.00 $ $ -28% -15% 37.74 6 Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day 47.00 $ 57.00 $ 64.00 $ 46.00 $ 72.00 $ 54.00 $ 45.00 $ $ -21% -4% 59.57 7 Chemical Oxygen Demand 54.00 $ 47.00 $ 64.00 $ 46.00 $ 72.00 $ 54.00 $ 45.00 $ $ -9% -21% 59.57 8 Volatile Suspended Solids 27.00 $ 11.00 $ 55.00 $ 44.00 $ 51.00 $ 48.00 $ 50.00 $ $ -49% -79% 52.58 9 Turbidity 39.00 $ 33.00 $ 38.00 $ 16.00 $ 32.00 $ 27.00 $ 10.00 $ $ 50% 27% 26.08 10 15 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 81.00 $ 62.00 $ 81.00 $ 43.00 $ 65.00 $ 48.00 $ 40.00 $ $ 38% 6% 58.72 2010 Study
Commonly Requested Test Caltest Basic
1 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) 35.00 $ 55.00 $ 38.00 $ 50.00 $ $ -27% 47.67 2 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 23.00 $ 32.00 $ 20.00 $ 25.00 $ $ -10% 25.67 3 Ammonia 26.00 $ 39.00 $ 23.00 $ 40.00 $ $ -24% 34.00
4 10 tube MPN total and fecal bacteria 51.00 $ 63.00 $ 45.00 $ 50.00 $ $ -3% 52.67 5 15 tube MPN total and fecal bacteria 60.00 $ 58.00 $ 55.00 $ 50.00 $ $ 10% 54.33 6 25 tube MPN total and fecal bacteria 69.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ $ -8% 75.00 7 Quanti-tray MPN rapid bacteria determination 50.00 $ 70.00 $ 55.00 $ 50.00 $ $ -14% 58.33 8 Colilert Drinking water bacteria 38.00 $ 45.00 $ 34.00 $ 35.00 $ $ 0% 38.00 9 Anions (typically nitrate only) 35.00 $ 39.00 $ 21.00 $ 35.00 $ $ 11% 31.67 10 Trace metals (typically iron and manganese) 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 30.00 $ 40.00 $ $ 25% 40.00 FY 10/11 Updated Prices
Delta from Mean (%)
Current Prices (FY 23/24)
Delta Proposed from Mean
Proposed Prices
Sierra Foothill
Competitor Mean
Competitor
CLS Pace Mean + 6%
Delta Current from Mean (%)

Laboratory Fee Study Cost Summary
2023 Estimates
Fixed Costs Variable CostsNumber of Tests 22,551 22,551 22,551 Labor Costs 163,176 $ Costs 405,967 $ 126,933 $ 96,752 $ Material Costs 69,704 $ Unit Costs 18.00 $ 5.63 $ 4.29 $ Total Fixed Costs per Unit: $ 27.92 Total Operating Cost: $ 862,533 Depreciation for Equipment:

Total Annual Costs: 862,533 $
2010 Study
Fixed Costs Variable CostsNumber of Tests 30,000 30,000 30,000 Labor Costs 200,094 $ Costs 469,507 $ 66,787 $ 31,800 $ Material Costs 72,053 $ Unit Costs 15.65 $ 2.23 $ 1.06 $
Total Operating Cost: $ 840,241
Depreciation for Equipment: $ 78,207Total Annual Costs: 918,448 $ Overhead Admin
General Equipment
CostsCosts
Overhead Admin
General Equipment

Laboratory Overhead Cost Detail
Line No. Account No. Cost Description Notes:
1 Management Costs 126,006 $ 4.20 $ 126,006 $ 4.20 $ 107,158 $ 4.75 $ (18,848.39) $ 0.55 $ (18,848.39) $ 0.55 $ 85% of management labor 2 8120-62110/62170 Utility Costs 36,772 $ 1.23 $ 36,537 $ 1.22 $ 15,689 $ 0.70 $ (21,083.30) $ (0.53) $ (20,847.97) $ (0.52) $ Cost per square foot ($24.77) 3 8140-62250 Telephone 1,440 $ 0.05 $ 1,440 $ 0.05 $ - $ - $ (1,440.00) $ (0.05) $ (1,440.00) $ (0.05) $ 4 8140-62301 Postage & Freight $ 0.27 8,000 $ 11,176 $ 0.37 $ - $ - $ (8,000.00) $ (0.27) $ (11,175.56) $ (0.37) $ Direct billed to customers for reimbursement 5 8140-62501 Office Supplies 2,000 $ 0.07 $ 1,771 $ 0.06 $ 2,536 $ 0.11 $ 535.84 $ 0.05 $ 765.22 $ 0.05 $ 6 8140-62507 Computer Forms and Supplies $ 0.05 1,500 $ 20 $ 0.00 $ - $ - $ (1,500.00) $ (0.05) $ (19.95) $ (0.00) $ 7 8140-62508 Photocopy Machine 3,100 $ 0.10 $ 3,096 $ 0.10 $ 1,321 $ 0.06 $ (1,779.07) $ (0.04) $ (1,775.39) $ (0.04) $ 8 8140-62701 Professional Services 115,000 $ 3.83 $ 110,783 $ 3.69 $ 3,575 $ 0.16 $ (111,425.14) $ (3.67) $ (107,208.44) $ (3.53) $ Only included expenditures related to lab 9 8140-62725 Commercial Lab Expenses $ 30,000 $ 1.00 $ 25,633 $ 0.85 $ - $ - $ (30,000.00) $ (1.00) $ (25,633.00) $ (0.85) Direct billed to customers for reimbursement 10 8140-62801 Travel & Meeting 1,250 $ 0.04 $ 4 $ 0.00 $ 1,904 $ 0.08 $ 654.00 $ 0.04 $ 1,900.00 $ 0.08 $ 11 8140-63101 Dues & Subscriptions $ 0.03 800 $ 499 $ 0.02 $ 30,754 $ 1.36 $ 29,953.74 $ 1.34 $ 30,254.74 $ 1.35 $ 12 8140-63401 Special Equipment O&M 25,000 $ 0.83 $ 26,222 $ 0.87 $ 40,218 $ 1.78 $ 15,218.24 $ 0.95 $ 13,996.69 $ 0.91 $ 13 8140-63470 Special O&M - Lab Supplies 47,947 $ 1.60 $ 107,318 $ 3.58 $ 109,122 $ 4.84 $ 61,174.93 $ 3.24 $ 1,803.78 $ 1.26 $ 14 8140-63501 Vehicle Maintenance - ISF 2,547 $ 0.08 $ 2,547 $ 0.08 $ 961 $ 0.04 $ (1,586.00) $ (0.04) $ (1,586.00) $ (0.04) $ 15 8140-63505 Vehicle Maintenance Fuel 2,528 $ 0.08 $ 1,348 $ 0.04 $ 292 $ 0.01 $ (2,236.18) $ (0.07) $ (1,056.36) $ (0.03) $ 16 8140-63599 Vehicle Replacement Fee 6,206 $ 0.21 $ 6,206 $ 0.21 $ - $ - $ (6,206.00) $ (0.21) $ (6,206.00) $ (0.21) $ 17 8140-63601 Building O&M - Maintenance 5,000 $ 0.17 $ 2,335 $ 0.08 $ 1,744 $ 0.08 $ (3,256.43) $ (0.09) $ (591.86) $ (0.00) $ 18 8140-63603 Building O&M - Janitorial 350 $ 0.01 $ 152 $ 0.01 $ - $ - $ (350.00) $ (0.01) $ (152.43) $ (0.01) $ 19 8140-63604 Building O&M - Laundry $ 0.07 2,000 $ 920 $ 0.03 $ 1,420 $ 0.06 $ (579.69) $ (0.00) $ 500.34 $ 0.03 $ 20 8140-63901 Training Program/Aids 3,500 $ 0.12 $ 383 $ 0.01 $ - $ - $ (3,500.00) $ (0.12) $ (382.60) $ (0.01) $ 21 8140-63904 Manuals/Codes 500 $ 0.02 $ 30 $ 0.00 $ - $ - $ (500.00) $ (0.02) $ (29.95) $ (0.00) $ 22 8140-63909 Safety Equipment 1,750 $ 0.06 $ 1,094 $ 0.04 $ 477 $ 0.02 $ (1,273.11) $ (0.04) $ (616.64) $ (0.02) $ 23 8140-64310 Liability Insurance 5,408 $ 0.18 $ 5,408 $ 0.18 $ 61,762 $ 2.74 $ 56,354.00 $ 2.56 $ 56,354.00 $ 2.56 $ 24 8140-65801 Computer Maintenance/Rep ISF 903 $ 0.03 $ 903 $ 0.03 $ 10,840 $ 0.48 $ 9,937.00 $ 0.45 $ 9,937.00 $ 0.45 $ 25 8140-66001 Other Materials and Supplies $ 0.50 15,000 $ 11,195 $ 0.37 $ 448 $ 0.02 $ (14,551.69) $ (0.48) $ (10,747.03) $ (0.35) $ 26 8140-69201 Equipment Repl & Addition 25,000 $ 0.83 $ - $ - $ 15,747 $ 0.70 $ (9,252.81) $ (0.14) $ 15,747.19 $ 0.70 $ Total Costs: 469,507 $ 15.65 $ 483,026 $ 16.10 $ 405,967 $ 18.00 $ (63,540) $ 2.35 $ (77,059) $ 1.90 $ FY 09/10 Expenditures (Est in Study)
FY 22/23 Expenditures
Cost per Sample (22,551 Tests)
Cost per Sample (30,000 Tests)
Expenditure Delta (Actual)
Cost per Sample Delta (Actual)
FY 09/10 Expenditures (Actual)
Cost per Sample (30,000 Tests)
Expenditure Delta (Est in Study)
Cost per Sample Delta (Study)

Laboratory Administrative Cost Detail
Line No. Process Description
1 Bottle Prep - order,inventory, label, and create kit:2 Routine 5 29.08 $ 145 $ 5 50.30 $ 251 $ 106 $ 3 Special 5 29.08 $ 145 $ 1 50.30 $ 50 $ (95) $
4 Sample Collection - plan, prepare, execute, and return:5 Marysville 2.5 $ 29.08 $ 73 $ 50.30 $ - $ (73) 6 Water Treatment Plant 10 29.08 $ 291 $ 7 50.30 $ 352 $ 61 $ 7 Wastewater Treatment Facility 30 33.75 $ 1,013 $ 10 54.31 $ 543 $ (469) $ 8 Sample Receipt & Distributions:9 Sample Receipt - complete COC, prepare receipt, and LIMS log-in 10 29.08 $ 291 $ 10 50.30 $ 503 $ 212 $ 10 Sample Prep - label samples, preserve, split, and note hold times 5 29.08 $ 145 $ 5 50.30 $ 251 $ 106 $ 11 Sample Distribution - internal - notify lab techs and store 10 $ 291 29.08 $ 2 50.30 $ 101 $ (190) $ 12 Sample Distribution - subcontract - prepare FedEx cooler and process 10 29.08 $ 291 $ 5 50.30 $ 251 $ (39) $ 13 Reporting:14 Internal - LIMS input and special studies 10 29.08 $ 291 $ 7 50.30 $ 352 $ 61 $ 15 Subcontract - prepare email pdf and invoices to Finance 10 29.0 $ 291 8 $ 10 50.30 $ 503 $ 212 $ 16 Data Validation:17 QA & QC - LIMS validation 2 60.58 $ 121 $ 10 68.07 $ 681 $ 560 $ Total/Week: 1,284 $ Total/Week: 2,441 $ 1,157 $ Total/Year: 66,787 $ Total/Year: 126,933 $ 60,147 $ FY 22/23 Processing Time (hrs/wk)
FY 22/23 Labor Rate ($/hr)
FY 22/23 Total Cost per Week
Total Cost per Week Delta
FY 09/10 Processing Time (hrs/wk)
FY 09/10 Labor Rate ($/hr)
FY 09/10 Total Cost per Week

Laboratory Equipment Utilized for Testing Cost Detail
Asset ID Capital Asset Date Acquired Lifespan Depreciation Date Capitalized Total Annual
Depreciation Per Unit Cost
1322 Balance, Analytical 2/1/1993 15 2/1/2008 2,500.00 $ 166.67 $ 0.01 $ 2295 180 Lt. Liquid Vessel 9/25/1998 10 9/25/2008 1,769.63 $ 176.96 $ 0.01 $ 2296 180 Lt. Liquid Vessel 9/25/1998 10 9/25/2008 1,769.62 $ 176.96 $ 0.01 $ 2297 Water Bath & Racks 9/1/1998 10 9/1/2008 2,427.91 $ 242.79 $ 0.01 $ 2298 10 x 10 Shed 6/23/1999 15 6/23/2014 1,914.41 $ 127.63 $ 0.01 $ 10057 SQL Server Labworks 10/21/2002 5 10/21/2007 12,939.50 $ 2,587.90 $ 0.11 $ 10340 WWTF Upgrade, Lab Cabinets 1/1/2005 15 1/1/2020 120,028.00 $ 8,001.87 $ 0.35 $ 10341 WWTF Upgrade, Lab Ceramic Tile 1/1/2005 20 1/1/2025 76,255.00 $ 3,812.75 $ 0.17 $ 10342 WWTF Upgrade, HVAC Lab 1/1/2005 10 1/1/2015 83,428.00 $ 8,342.80 $ 0.37 $ 10343 WWTF Upgrade, Lab Building 1/1/2005 20 1/1/2025 248,413.00 $ 12,420.65 $ 0.55 $ 10385 121C Sterilizer & Exhuast 8/25/2005 10 8/25/2015 7,007.37 $ 700.74 $ 0.03 $ 11175 ICS-1100 Pump 10/18/2012 5 10/18/2017 32,148.07 $ 6,429.61 $ 0.29 $ 11176 Labworks Software 6/12/2013 5 6/12/2018 10,530.11 $ 2,106.02 $ 0.09 $ 11379 Nexion 300/350 ICP-MS & Opima 6/22/2016 5 6/22/2021 191,605.21 $ 38,321.04 $ 1.70 $ 11440 TOC Analyzer 11/16/2016 10 11/16/2026 31,980.69 $ 3,198.07 $ 0.14 $ 11441 Air Compressor 11/30/2016 5 11/30/2021 5,219.82 $ 1,043.96 $ 0.05 $ 11442 Exhaust Ventilation System 1/10/2017 10 1/10/2027 7,058.00 $ 705.80 $ 0.03 $ 11612 Mechanical Incubator 12/11/2018 5 12/11/2023 5,508.50 $ 1,101.70 $ 0.05 $ 11613 Titrator & Autosampler 4/3/2019 10 4/3/2029 48,874.75 $ 4,887.48 $ 0.22 $ 11938 Mettler Toledo Analytical Balance 11/18/2021 5 11/18/2026 5,73 $ 1,146.40 2.00 $ 0.05 $ 11939 Laboratory Spectrophotometer 1/6/2022 5 1/6/2027 5,272.70 $ 1,054.54 $ 0.05 $ Total: 902,382.29 $ 96,752.34 $ 4.29 $

Laboratory Labor Cost Detail
Line No. Type of Test Time per Batch Time per Test Rate ($63.63) Total Labor Cost 1 Metals:

NEW Metals by ICP/MS 1.00 17 0.06 3.74 $ 570 2,133.48 $ 2 Metals by ICP-OES (all 20 elements) 1.00 20 0.05 3.18 $ 131 416.78 $ 8 Metals Digestion for total determination 0.75 10 0.08 4.77 $ 22 104.99 $ NEW Metals Filtration for dissolved metals 0.10 1 0.10 6.36 $ 0 - $ 9 Hardness as CaCO3 total by calculation 0.10 1 0.10 6.36 $ 34 216.34 $ 10 Microbiology:11 Colilert Presence / Absence 0.10 1 0.10 6.36 $ 2215 14,094.05 $ 12 Ten tube Total Coliform, drinking water 0.20 1 0.20 12.73 $ 0 - $ 13 Ten tube Fecal Coliform, drinking water 0.20 1 0.20 12.73 $ 0 - $ 14 15 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 0.20 1 0.20 12.73 $ 683 8,691.86 $ 15 15 Tubes Fecal Coliform, MPN/100ml 0.20 1 0.20 12.73 $ 57 725.38 $ 16 25 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 0.20 1 0.20 12.73 $ 0 - $ 17 25 Tubes Fecal Coliform, MPN/100ml 0.20 1 0.20 12.73 $ 0 - $ 19 MPN Quanti-Tray Method - Total Coliform 0.20 1 0.20 12.73 $ 399 5,077.67 $ 20 Heterotrophic Plate Count, (PP) 1.75 10 0.18 11.14 $ 231 2,572.24 $ 21 Inorganics:22 Anions by IC (per element) 2.00 8 0.25 15.91 $ 511 8,128.73 $ 24 Alkalinity, Total (as CaCO3) 0.75 6 0.13 7.95 $ 675 5,368.78 $ NEW Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 0.10 1 0.10 6.36 $ 18 114.53 $ NEW Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 0.10 1 0.10 6.36 $ 18 114.53 $ NEW Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 0.10 1 0.10 6.36 $ 18 114.53 $ 26 Electrical Conductivity 0.20 4 0.05 3.18 $ 1902 6,051.21 $ 29 Total Organic Carbon 1.50 3 0.50 31.82 $ 53 1,686.20 $ 31 Turbidity 0.30 4 0.08 4.77 $ 900 4,295.03 $
32 Wet Chemistry:33 Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day 2.00 8 0.25 15.91 $ 1361 21,650.11 $ 34 BOD, 5 Day Soluble 2.00 8 0.25 15.91 $ 0 - $
35 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day 2.00 8 0.25 15.91 $ 141 2,242.96 $ 36 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day Sol. 2.00 8 0.25 15 $ 0 - .91 $ 37 Chemical Oxygen Demand 0.60 3 0.20 12.73 $ 1270 16,162.02 $ 38 Chemical Oxygen Demand, Soluble 0.60 3 0.20 12.73 $ 59 750.83 $ 39 Ammonia as N 1.50 15 0.10 6.36 $ 754 4,797.70 $
42 pH 0.20 6 0.03 2.12 $ 2009 4,261.09 $
43 Settleable Solids - 30 minute 0.25 4 0.06 3.98 $ 357 1,419.74 $ 44 Settleable Solids - 60 minute 0.25 4 0.06 3.98 $ 1523 6,056.78 $ 45 Total Dissolved Solids 1.20 3 0.40 25.45 $ 130 3,308.76 $ 46 Total Dissolved Solids - Fixed 1.20 3 0.40 25.45 $ 0 - $ 48 Total Dissolved Volatile Solids 1.20 3 0.40 25.45 $ 0 - $ 49 Total Solids 1.00 4 0.25 15.91 $ 356 5,663.07 $ 50 Tot. Suspended Solids 1.50 12 0.13 7.95 $ 3815 30,343.56 $ 51 Volatile Solids 0.20 4 0.05 3.18 $ 322 1,024.44 $ 52 Volatile Suspended Solids 0.20 6 0.03 2.12 $ 908 1,925.87 $ NEW Volatile Acids 0.75 4 0.19 11.93 $ 307 3,662.70 $
FY Labor Costs: 163,175.97 $
Number of Tests per Batch
Number of Tests in FY 22/23

Laboratory Materials Cost Detail
Line No. Type of Test Material Cost per Batch Cost per Test Total Materials Cost 1 Metals:

NEW Metals by ICP/MS $ 17 1.11 18.91 $ 570 634.04 $
2 Metals by ICP-OES (all 20 elements) $ 20 0.85 17.05 $ 131 111.68 $ 8 Metals Digestion for total determination 20.38 $ 10 2.04 $ 22 44.84 $ NEW Metals Filtration for dissolved metals $ 1 1.25 1.25 $ 0 - $ 9 Hardness as CaCO3 total by calculation - $ 1 - $ 34 - $ 10 Microbiology:11 Colilert Presence / Absence 9.47 $ 1 9.47 $ 2215 20,976.05 $ 12 Ten tube Total Coliform, drinking water 10.35 $ 1 10.35 $ 0 - $ 13 Ten tube Fecal Coliform, drinking water 8.72 $ 1 8.72 $ 0 - $ 14 15 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 15.52 $ 1 15.52 $ 683 10,600.16 $ 15 15 Tubes Fecal Coliform, MPN/100ml 13.08 $ 1 13.08 $ 57 745.56 $ 16 25 Tubes Total Coliform, MPN/100ml 25.87 $ 1 25.87 $ 0 - $ 17 25 Tubes Fecal Coliform, MPN/100ml 21.80 $ 1 21.80 $ 0 - $ 19 MPN Quanti-Tray Method - Total Coliform 12.73 $ 1 12.73 $ 399 5,079.27 $ 20 Heterotrophic Plate Count, (PP) 17.83 $ 10 1.78 $ 231 411.87 $ 21 Inorganics:22 Anions by IC (per element) 56.24 $ 8 7.03 $ 511 3,592.33 $ 24 Alkalinity, Total (as CaCO3) 16.25 $ 6 2.71 $ 675 1,828.13 $ NEW Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 $ 1 - - $ 18 - $
NEW Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 $ 1 - - $ 18 - $
NEW Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 $ 1 - - $ 18 - $
26 Electrical Conductivity 5.59 $ 4 1.40 $ 1902 2,658.05 $ 29 Total Organic Carbon 167.96 $ 3 55.99 $ 53 2,967.29 $ 31 Turbidity - $ 4 - $ 900 - $ 32 Wet Chemistry:33 Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day 57.86 $ 8 7.23 $ 1361 9,843.43 $ 34 BOD, 5 Day Soluble 59.11 $ 8 7.39 $ 0 - $ 35 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day 60.01 $ 8 7.50 $ 141 1,057.68 $ 36 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day Sol. 61.26 $ 8 7.66 $ 0 - $ 37 Chemical Oxygen Demand 5.04 $ 3 1.68 $ 1270 2,133.60 $ 38 Chemical Oxygen Demand, Soluble 6.29 $ 3 2.10 $ 59 123.70 $ 39 Ammonia as N 17.41 $ 15 1.16 $ 754 875.14 $ 42 pH $ 6 0.65 3.88 $ 2009 1,299.15 $ 43 Settleable Solids - 30 minute - $ 4 - $ 357 - $ 44 Settleable Solids - 60 minute - $ 4 - $ 1523 - $ 45 Total Dissolved Solids 5.25 $ 3 1.75 $ 130 227.50 $ 46 Total Dissolved Solids - Fixed 5.25 $ 3 1.75 $ 0 - $ 48 Total Dissolved Volatile Solids 5.25 $ 3 1.75 $ 0 - $ 49 Total Solids - $ 4 - $ 356 - $ 50 Tot. Suspended Solids 6.57 $ 12 0.55 $ 3815 2,088.71 $ 51 Volatile Solids - $ 4 - $ 322 - $ 52 Volatile Suspended Solids - $ 6 - $ 908 - $ NEW Volatile Acids $ 4 7.84 31.35 $ 307 2,406.11 $
FY Materials Costs: 69,704.29 $
Number of Tests per Batch
Number of Tests in FY 22/23

Agenda Item 30

CITY OF YUBA CITY

STAFF REPORT
Date: November 7, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council;
From: Administration Department
Presentation By: Ciara Wakefield, City Clerk Administrator Summary
Subject: 2024 City Council Meeting Calendar
Recommendation: Cancel the January 2 and August 6, 2024 Regular Council Meetings and provide for Special Workshops to be scheduled as needed
Fiscal Impact: No fiscal impact
Purpose:

To establish the City Council Meeting Calendar for 2024.

Background:

The Yuba City Municipal Code Section 2-1.01 sets the Regular meetings of the City Council to occur on the first and third Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. (5:00 p.m. for any closed session items) in the Council Chambers. Special meetings or workshops may be called at any time by the Mayor or by a majority of the members of the Council.

In order to allow the City Council to determine their schedules in advance and to allow staff to prepare for meetings and workshops more efficiently, it is proposed that Council approve a Council Meeting Calendar for 2024. The proposed calendar is attached for your reference.

Analysis:
2024 provides few scheduling conflicts with City Council Meetings and holidays. The following Regular Council meetings are recommended to be canceled:
• January 2, 2024
City Hall offices are typically closed the last week in December for approved Holiday Closure, the time during which agenda preparation usually occurs. For this reason, the first meeting in January has been canceled.
• August 6, 2024
City Council has the option of participating in National Night Out events on the first Tuesday in August in place of the scheduled Council meeting. National Night Out is designed to heighten crime and drug

prevention awareness and to provide an opportunity to promote and celebrate police-community partnerships in crime prevention efforts. This event is well received by the community.

Special Meetings
• December 10, 2024 – Election Results
With General Municipal Elections being held on November 5, 2024, for two seats on the City Council, City Clerk, and City Treasurer, the California Election Code, Section 10262(b), requires that the City Council declare elected the persons for whom the highest numbers of votes were cast for each office.

Special Workshops
Special Workshops will be scheduled as needed. At this point, the following Workshop is proposed for the 2024 meeting schedule:
• May 28, 2024 – Budget Study Workshop
Discuss Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget Planning and Projections Other Considerations
• April 16, 2024 - Cap to Cap
The annual Cap-to-Cap conference is April 13-17, 2024. With this in mind, Council should consider whether a quorum will be available for the meeting on April 16, 2024 and advise staff whether this meeting should remain on the schedule.

Alternatives:

Regular meetings are set by the Municipal Code, however if needed, meetings can be canceled by the Council with sufficient notice, and special meetings can be scheduled as needed.

Fiscal Impact:

No fiscal impact
Recommendation:

Cancel the January 2 and August 6, 2024 Regular Council Meetings and provide for Special Workshops to be scheduled as needed.

Attachments:

1. 2024 Calendar at a Glance (DRAFT)
Prepared By: Submitted By:

Ciara Wakefield
City Clerk Administrator
Diana Langley
City Manager

ATTACHMENT 1

Council Meeting
Special Meeting/Workshop
National Night Out
Holiday
2024 City Council
Agenda Schedule

AT A GLANCE (DRAFT)

JANUARY

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31

FEBRUARY

S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29
MARCH

S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 APRIL

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
MAY

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
JUNE

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 JULY

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
AUGUST

S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

SEPTEMBER

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

OCTOBER

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31

NOVEMBER

S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

DECEMBER

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31

CITY OF YUBA CITY
Future Agenda Items
- Councilmember Boomgaarden
- Councilmember Pasquale
- Councilmember Shaw
- Vice Mayor Harris
- Mayor Kirchner

CITY OF YUBA CITY
Reports and Communications
The following reports and communication items are provided for the Council’s information. No action can be taken on items under this section unless the Council agrees to include it on a subsequent agenda
City Manager’s Report

CITY OF YUBA CITY
Reports and Communications
The following reports and communication items are provided for the Council’s information. No action can be taken on items under this section unless the Council agrees to include it on a subsequent agenda
City Council Reports
- Councilmember Boomgaarden
- Councilmember Pasquale
- Councilmember Shaw
- Vice Mayor Harris
- Mayor Kirchner
Adjournment