0.6278
45.9592
2.4626
48.4217
12.2950
2.4385
14.7336
0.0000
76,811.18
76,811.18
2.8282
0.4832
77,025.87
71,
16 16
86 Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area •' 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 ' 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 + 0.0000 18,148.59 • 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
i 50 50 92
Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 ' 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 + 8,355.983 8,355.983 ' 0.1602 0.1532 ' 8,405.638
+ 2 2 7
Mobile 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 + 50,306.60 • 50,306.60 2.1807 50,361.12
+ 34 34 08
+ ' '
Total
41.1168
67.2262
207.5497
0.6278
45.9592
2.4626
48.4217
12.2950
2.4385
14.7336
0.0000
76,811.18
76,811.18
2.8282
0.4832
77,025.87
16 16
86 748
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Reduction
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 •Demolition •Demolition
w9/1/2021
:10/12/2021
5 30:
%---------------------------------------
I ------------ 4
------------
4-------- 4
--------- ---_ -------------------
2 •Site Preparation :Site Preparation
110/13/2021
' 11/9/2021
5'
20:
-------------------------------------------------------- I------------ 4
------------
3 :Grading :Grading
111/10/2021
:1/11/2022
5:
45:
------------------------------------------------
I ------------ 4
------------
4-------- 4--------T-------------------------
4 :Building Construction :Building Construction
11/12/2022
:12/12/2023
5:
500:
------------------------------------------------
I------------ 4
------------
4-------- 4--------T-------------------------
5 :Paving :Paving
112/13/2023
:1/30/2024
5:
35:
--------------------------------------------------------- ----------- -r----------- I------- I---------11------------------------- 6 -Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating •1/31/2024 :3/19/2024 5•
35:
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft)
OffRoad Equipment
749
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition •Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 i 8.00;
81'
0.73 ----------------------------=---------------------------F-----------------4-------------F __ - Demolition -Excavators 3; 8.00
__-
158:
0.38 -------------------------------------------------------F-----------------------------F-------------------------- Demolition •Rubber Tired Dozers 2: 8.00
247:
0.40 -------------------------------------------------------F----------------------------- F----- --------------�-------------- Site Preparation -Rubber Tired Dozers 3: 8.00:
247:
0.40 -------------------------------------------------------- F-----------------j- F - _______ --------
-
Site Preparation •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
p
418.00
97:
0.37 -------------------------------------------------------- E---------------21----------8.00F - - ' .........
Grading Excavators
158�
0.38 ------------------------------------------------------- F----------------- 1------------- F--- -_---------------�-------------- Grading :Graders
1i 8.00.
187'
0.41 ----------------------------I---------------------------- '
Grading :Rubber Tired Dozers
18.00. 247•
0.40 -------------------------------------------------------F---------------- 4------------- F--------- --------------- --
Grading Scrapers
21 8.00-
367:
0.48 -------------------------------------------------------- F------------------------------- F----- --------------------- Grading •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 21 8.00
--------------
97'
0.37 -------------------------------------------------------- Building Construction :Cranes
1 i 7.00,
231'
0.29 ---------------------------- F------------------------------ F-------------------------------- Building Construction :Forklifts
3: 8.00
89'
0.20 ------------------------------------------------------ -F-----------------------------
--------------
Building Construction :Generator Sets
1 i 8.00:
84'
0.74 --------------------------------------------------------F ---------------- i------------- F----------------------- --�-------------- Building Construction •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
31 7.00-
97:
0.37 ----- --- ---- ---------------------F--------------- -------- - -
Building Construction :Welders
11 8.00.1
46:
0.45 ---------------------------- :--------------------------- ' ........--0.42
Paving :Pavers
F---------------2j---..---.-B.00F-----�-�----130�
-------------------------------------------------------- F------------ -----+-------------
--------------
Paving :Paving E ui ment
9 9 Equipment
2 8.00.
132:
0.36 ---------------------------- :---------------------------F ----------------- ------------- F----------------------- --- Paving :Rollers
2: 8.00
80:
0.38 Architectural Coating :Air Compressors
1 6.00-
78,
0.48 Trips and VMT
750
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition
6i 15.00,
0.001
458.00- 10.00i
6.90:
20.001LD_Mix
;HDT_Mix
HHDT
----------------
----------t----------'-
---------
--
----------
Site Preparation
7 18.00 -
0.001
0.00 : 10.001
6.90:
20.00 1 LD_Mix
1 HDT_Mix
HHDT
-- ------ ----------------
--------------------
'----------
-------------
Grading
820.00-
0.001
0.00: 10.001
6.90:
20.001LD Mix
1HDT Mix
'HHDT
--------------------------------
-----------+----------
F----------- 4----------
-------------
Building Construction
9i 801,00:
143.001
0.00: 10.001
6.90:
20.001LD_Mix
1HDT_Mix
iHHDT
--------------------------------
Paving
----------I-
'----------
'
--T----------
61 15.00,
0.001
0.00: 10.001
6.90;
20.001LD-Mix
1HDT_Mix
:HHDT
-------------------------------- ----------r-------------------r-----------+----------I--------------------------------------------- Architectural Coating
1 160.00.
0.00,
0.00, 10.00.
6.90,
20.00-LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
3.2 Demolition - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 + 0.0000 0.0000 i
i
Off -Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 + 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 - 3,774.317 i 9 ; 9 4
, ' '
Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.6650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
3,747.944
3,747.944
1.0549
3,774.317
1 1
1 1
9 9
4 751
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
Total
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 + 1,292.241 1,292.241 0.0877 1,294.433
+ 3 3 7
.. i+
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ____ _
0.0000 T
± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
.i
Worker 0.0487 0.0313 0.4282 1.1800e- 0.1141 9.5000e- 0.1151 0.0303 8.8000e- 0.0311 + 117.2799 117.2799 3.5200e- 117.3678
003 ; 004 ; 004 ;
+ ; 003
+ ' '
Total
0.1760
4.1265
1.3884
0.0131
0.3810
0.0135
0.3946
0.1034
0.0129
0.1163
1,409.521
1,409.521
0.0912
1,411.801
2 2
5 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 + 0.0000 0.0000 -
--------------------------------------------------------4-------T+ � ------- a ------- ____
-------4--- -
Off -Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 - T 3,774.317 +
9 9 4
+ ' , ' ' ,
Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419 0.0000
3,747.944
3,747.944
1.0549
3,774.317
9 9
4 752
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 + 1,292.241 1,292.241 0.0877 1,294.433
i 3 3 7
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 j 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000
,
,
i i
--_____----:-------'+--------------r---------------------------�-------�-------T-------+ i ,
" " "'r-------------�-------�-------T-------
Worker 0.0487 0.0313 0.4282 1.1800e- 0.1141 9.5000e- 0.1151 0.0303 8.8000e- 0.0311 117.2799 117.2799 3.5200e- 117.3678
003 004 ; 004 ;
y 003
Total
4.1265
1.3884
0.0131
0.3810
0.0135
0.3946
0.1034
0.0129
0.1163
1,409.521
1,409.521
0.0912
1,411.801
FI60
2 2
5 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 + 0.0000 0.0000 +_ ,_ ,_
------____---------------4-------- - - - - - - - - - - - -------� - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------�--- Off -Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656, 3,685.656 1.1920 i 3,715.457
+ 9 9 3
+ , ' ,
Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
3,685'656
3,685.656
1.1920
3,715.457
9 9
3 753
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
+
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i i
1 Worker 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e- 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 + 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e- 140.8414
003 003 ; ; 003
i ; 003
+ '
Total
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
0.1369
1.1400e-
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
140.8414
003
003
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 1 0.0000 0.0000 i + i
i + i
Off -Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 i 0.0000 3,685.656 3.685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 + 9 9 3
+ ,
Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116 0.0000
3,685.656
3,685.656
1.1920
3,715.457
1 1
9 1
9 1
3 754
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
INBio-
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
-*
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T
0.0000
a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i
i
Worker 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e- 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 + 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e- 140.8414
003 003 ; 003
+ ; 003
' ' '
Total
0.0584
0.0375
0.5139
1.4100e-
0.1369
1.1400e-
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
0.0374
140.7359
140.7359
4.2200e-
140.8414
003
003
003
003
3.4 Grading - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NB"- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 + 0.0000 0.0000 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ •,_______
'------- '------- ;_______ '____---7------- ;_____-- '------- ;____---- - - - - -- - + _ _ _ _ _ . _,------_1-------1----------- Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 T 6,055.613 +
i 4 4 4
i
Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
6,007.043
6,007.043
1.9428
6'055.613
4 4
4 755
756
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
p2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 j 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i
i i
i
Worker 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e- 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 + 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e- 156.4904
003 003 ' 003 ;
y ; 003 ;
' '
A
' ' '
Total
0.0649
0.0417
0.5710
1.5700e-
0.1521
1.2700e-
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
0.0415
156.3732
156.3732
4.6900e-
156.4904
003
003
003
003
3.4 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 + 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 + 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 : T 6,060.015 + 5 5 3 8
a
Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
6,011.410
6,011.410
1.9442
6,060.015
5 5
8 757
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
_______----�-______�_------�-------------�----___' ------- �------- - ------� ---------___- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + ------n-------n---
0.0000 0.0000
+ 0.0000 0.0000
., , i ,
i
Worker 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e- 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 + 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e- 150.9813
003 ; 003 ; 003
1 ' 003
' '
a ' ' '
Total
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
0.1521
1.2300e-
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.2400e-
150.9813
003
003
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 + 0.0000 0.0000 ., i i i i
Off -Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1,5041 + 0.0000 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 i 5 5 8
' ' i ' 1 ' ,
Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006 0.0000
6,011.410
6,011.410
1.9442
6,060.015
5 5
8 758
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
.. .
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ?
+ 0 0-000 0 0-00-0 0 0-000 0.0000
__------ --------------'+------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------------------------------ - - - - - - - -------�-------T-------
Worker 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e- 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 + 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e- 150.9813
003 003 ; 003 i
003
, , '
Total
0.0607
0.0376
0.5263
1.5100e-
0.1521
1.2300e-
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
0.0415
150.8754
150.8754
4.24OOe-
150.9813
11 003
003
003
003
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NB io- CO2
To tal CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 + 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632
± 6 , 6 2
' '
Total
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
2,554.333
0.6120
2,569.632
F7062
6 6
2 759
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-
CH4
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
777
7 Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
..
.. i i
i
Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 3,896.548 0.2236 3,902.138
i
i 2 ; 2 , 4
Worker 2.4299 1.5074 21.0801 0.0607 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 i 6,042.558 6,042.558 0.1697 6,046.800
i
5 5 , , 0
, '
Total
2.8378
14.7106
24.5142
0.0971
7.0087
0.0741
7.0828
1.8799
0.0691
1.9490
9,939.106
9,939.106
0.3933
9,948.938
7 7
4 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 ± 0.0000 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632
i 6 6 2
' , '
Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
2,554.333
0.6120
2,569.632
6 6
2 760
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
., , , , , , , , ,
i ,
Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 + 3,896.548 3,896.548 0.2236 3,902.138
2 2 ; 4
Worker 2.4299 1.5074 21.0801 0.0607 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 6,042.558 6,042.558 0.1697
+ 6,046.800
5 ; 5 0
, '
'79,948.938
Total
2.8378
14.7106
24.5142
0.0971
7.0087
0.0741
7.0828
1.8799
0.0691
1.9490
9,939.106
9,939.106
0.3933
7 7
4 3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 g 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 + 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406
a 9 9 1
' ' ,
Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
2,555.209
0.6079
2,57n406
9 9
761
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0600 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
.i
-------------------------------- --------------------- -------------- n--------r-------j i i
------- i------- -------------------------------
Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 3,773.876 0.1982 3,778.830
j
a 2 2 0
.,
a
Worker 2.2780 1.3628 19.4002 0.0584 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 i 5,821.402 5,821.402 0.1529 5,825.225
i
i 8 8 4
1 y ' ,
Total
11.3809
22.6017
0.0936
7.0088
0.0695
7.0682
1.8799
0.0552
1.9350
9,595.279
9,595.279
0.3511
9,60 4.055
177
1 1
0 0
4 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 + 0.0000 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406
i 9 9 1
i
8 �
' , ' '
Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
2,555.209
0.6079
2,570.406
9 9
1 762
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.0000
i
ii
i i i
Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 3,773.876 0.1982 ? 3,778.830
i
i 2 2 ; 0
-------- ------ ---------------*--
�-------------------------------
Worker 2.2780 1.3628 19.4002 0.0584 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,821.402 5,821.402 0.1529 5,825.225
i
' '
Total
2.5807
11.3809
22.5017
0.0936
7.0088
0.0595
7.0682
1.8799
0.0552
1.9350
9,595.279
9,595.279
0.3.911
9,604. 555
0 0
4 3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 + 2,207.584 - 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 i 1 1 , 6
i i
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 a0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 i
i
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
2,207.584
0.7140
2,225.433
1 1
1 1
1 6
763
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
P12.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000
..
------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------T-------'t----••- t
----- --r------ ------- n-------T-------
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
..
..
+
Worker 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e- 0.1141 9.000Oe- 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 + 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e- 109.0866
003 ; 004 ; 004
d ; ' 003 '
' '
' '
Total
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
0.1141
9.000Oe-
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
109.0866
003
004
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 i 0.0000 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 + 1 1 6
.. a
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1 0.0000
i
1 1 1 1
'
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.46134
0.4694 0.0000
2,207.584
2,207.584
0.7140
2,225.433
1 1
6 764
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
.i i
i
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
+
---- ------'-------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------------_____----------------------- Worker 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e- 0.1141 9.000Oe- 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 ____"i-------�
j 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e- 109.0866
003 ' 004 ; ; 004 '
i ' 003
'
' '
Total
0.0427
0.0255
0.3633
1.0900e-
0.1141
9.000Oe-
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
0.0311
109.0150
109.0150
2.8600e-
109.0866
003
004
004
003
3.6 Paving - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 + 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 a 2 2 3
___________•,_______------- _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ ______________r_______y_______,_______�------- Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000o
i 0.0000 0.0000
i ' ' ' '
Total
82 9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207'547
2,207.547
0.7140
2,225.396
798
2 2
3 765
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000
------------------- ------- -------'+--------------i------- -------------- i---------------- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 j ---------- --
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
j 0.0000
--------------+---------------------------------------------------------+--------------- Worker 0.0403 0.0233 0.3384 1.0600e- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 ------- -----------------------
105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e- 105.6992
003 ' 004 ' 004
+ i 003 ;
'
Total
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
0.1141
8.8000e-
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
105.6992
003
004
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total1
INBio-
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 + 0.0000 2,207.547 - 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 i 2 2 , 3
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i
i
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310 0.0000
2,207.547
2,207.547
0.7140
2,225.396
11 2
2 1
3 766
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.6 Paving - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 + 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000
..
Vendor 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000
.. . i i 1 . . 1
i . . i
Worker 0.0403 0.0233 0.3384 1.0600e- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 1 0.0311 + 105.6336 1 105.6336 2.6300e- 105.6992
003 ' 004 ' 004 '
± ; ; 003 '
'
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1
Total
0.0403
0.0233
0.3384
1.0600e-
0.1141
8.8000e-
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
0.0311
105.6336
105.6336
2.6300e-
105.6992
003
004
004
003
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 .. . . . . i i 1
___
Off -Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 j
i 1 1
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
.8443 281
003
767
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
-----------�-------------------� --------------------� --------T-------j----------- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ---- ---------------;---------------
0.0000 0.0000
+ 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e- 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 +
- - - - -------T--'----
+
'
1,126.758 1,126.758 0.0280 1,127.458
003 ; 003
i 3 ; 3 3
1 ' ,
Total
0.4296
0.2481
3.6098
0.0113
1.2171
9.4300e-
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
0.3315
1,126.758
1,126.758
0.0280
1,127.458
11 003
003
3 3
3 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 +
-------------------------- ---003--' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ____ Off -Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 ? 281.8443 +
i
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609 0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
003
768
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM 10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000
.1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1
.. 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 ,
i
---------------
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1 1
1 1 1
i 1 1
Worker 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1 1.2171 1 9.4300e- 1 1.2266 1 0.3229 8.6800e- 1 0.3315 1,126.758 1 1,126.758 1 0.0280 1 T 1,127.458
' 003 ' i 003 ; i
3 3 3
1 1 1 1
1 1 '
Total
0.4296
0.2481
3.6098
0.0113
1.2171
9.4300e-
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
0.3315
1,126.758
1,126.758
0.0280
1,127. 558
11 003
003
3 3
3 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
769
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG
NOx
I CO
S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360
46.2951
12.2950
0.3119
12.6070
50,306.60 50,306.60 2.1807
50,361.12
s
34 34
08 _ _- _
Unmitigated m 9.8489 T 45.4304 T 114.8495T 0.4917 T 45.9592 T 0.3360 T 46.2951 Y 12.2950 T 0.3119 -r 12.6070 r50,306.60T50,306.60T 2.1807 T
? 50,361 12
34 34
08 4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25
t 154.00 506,227 506,227
• • • • • • • • • ..........:..------------I------------ ---
Apartments Mid Rise3,773.25
i 4075.5013,660,065
.................................... ------------
---4,026.75----�
+
-13,660,065
----------
General Office Building 288.45 62.55
31.05 706,812 706,812
.....................................--------------- t------------ t------------ --------------------- -------
-
Turnover (Sit Down Restau ra. t)• •2,873.52
i 2817.72 3.413,937 3.413,937-
• • • • •High
---2,368.80-
.....-----F-----------
Hotel 192.00 187.50
1 160.00 445,703 445,703
•
..................................... I-------------
--- ----1
- --------
Quality Restaurant • 501 12 1 511.92
i 461.20 707,488 707,488
• • • • • • • • • • • ---
......... :-----F------------}-----------Y------------------------� Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44
i 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221
Total
8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452
4.3 Trip Type Information
770
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer EHW:or
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass -by
Apartments Low Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 ; 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 .......................-------------------T----------'_---------r---------r Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20
-----------
40.60 86
11 --------
3 . .....................r _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - -r General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00
- - - - -
19.00 77
19 - - - .
4 ...................r---6.60__-r---------�----
Hi h Turnover Sit Down
16.60 -
8.--
T---------r
6.90 ;
8.50 72.50
i 19.00
37 20
------
43 Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60
1 19.00
58 38
4 Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 ; 12.00 69.00
•Regional
i 19.00 ;
38 ;
18 ;
44 ..
Shopping Center
--------
16.60 -------
8.40 --------
6.90 -------
16.30 ----- ---
64.70 --------------------
19.00 54
---------------------
35 11
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH
Apartments Low Rise 0.543088• 0.0442161 0.209971 1 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712I
0.000821
----------------------_------ r-------F-------1--------t-------- �-------j--------f-------}--------1--------t -------j-------- t------ Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088• 0.044216 0.209971
i i 0.116369 i 0.014033 i 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712 i
0.000821
I
General Office Building0.543088• 0.0442161 0.2099711
0.116369i 0.014033 0.006332i 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.0007121
0.000821
------------------------_------------------------t--------t---------------------------------------- 4-------- --------*------ High Turnover (Sit Down 0.543088• 0.044216 - 0.209971 - 0.116369 - 0.014033 , 0.006332 - 0.021166 - 0.033577 , 0.002613 , 0.001817 • 0.005285 , 0.000712 ,
0.000821
Restaurant)
- - - - - - - - F_- - - r-_- _ __r _ --_ t------------ t--------------- t-------------- t-------- ------ t-------- ------r--------- r - - - r--------- --------- Hotel 0.543088• 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712:
0.000821
----------------------- _------- r-------
Quality Restaurant 0.543088•
0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.0007121
0.000821
Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 • 0.044216 • 0.209971 - 0.116369 • 0.014033 • 0.006332 - 0.021166 - 0.033577 - 0.002613 • 0.001817 , 0.005285 , 0.000712 -
0.000821
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
771
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO IS02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 i 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602
0.1532 8,405.638
Mitigated
+
2 2
7 i i i
i
NaturalGas
0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 _ _ _ _ _ _ _
r8,355.983T8,355.983T 0.1602 -r
0.1532 ? 8,405.638
Unmitigated
2 2
7 772
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2O16.3.2 Page 31 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
s Use
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low 1119.16 +' 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- ' 8.3400e- ' 8.3400e- 8.3400e- +'
+ 131.6662 ' 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- ' 132.4486
Rise , +. 004 003 003 003 003
,
+ ; 003 003
Apartments Mid 35784.3 + 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666
4.209.916 ' 4,209.916 0.0807 0.0772
Rise
+ 4,234.933
4 4 , 9
General Office 1283.42 +: 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e- ' - 9.5600e- 9.5600e- - 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e- 2.7700e- 151.8884
Building 004 ; 003 003 003 003
+
003 003
+, ,
-----------
----14
+ ,
Sit 227---*,------- --------------- ------------- -----6 0.1-96 -
1. High Turnover (Sit 22759.9 + 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 -------------------------------------T-------
2,677.634 ' 2,677.634 ' 0.0513 0.0491 '
Down Restaurant);
+ 2,693.546
+, ,
----- - - - --------•-------------------------------;------- + 2 ' 2 0
+______________,
---------------n------
Hotel 4769.72 + 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e- 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 T 0.0355 i ______�_______ ______ _
561.1436 ' 561.1436 ' 0.0108 0.0103 T 564.4782
i 003
__ +,------4-------4 - - - - - - 4 ------4-------'+
,
------'
,
Quality 5057.75 +' 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 - 2.9800e- - 0.0377 0.0377 ' 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 ? 598.5658
+
Restaurant +, 003 +
...._______r------�-------'+------------------------------------------1------- -------T-------+------
Reg ional 251.616 +� 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- --- --
29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e 5.4000e T 29.7778
+
Shopping Center ; + 003 004 003 003 003 003
004 004
±
' '
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
8,355.983
0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
2 2
7 773
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturaiGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
Total CO2
CH20
4 N
CO2e
s Use
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
INBio-CO2
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low 1.11916 + 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- + 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- - 2.4100e- 132.4486
Rise 004 ; ; 003 ; 003 ; 003 ; 003
i ; ; ; 003 '
Apartments Mid 35.7843 i 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4,209.916 0.0807 0.0772 T4,234.933
Rise i, ; , ; ,
i
i 4 ; 4 , ; 9
,
+, , , , , , , , , ,
_-_...-____;______+'-------; ---------------------------'+----------------------------'-----__'+..------------n--------------n-------T.----.- General Office 1.28342 + 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e- 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 9.5600e- i . , , , '
+ 150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e- 2.7700e- 151.8884
Building i, , ; 004 ; 003 ; 003 003 ; 003
+ ; ; 003 ; 003 ;
+, , , , , , , , , ,
i , , , , ,
High Turnover (Sit, 22.7599 + 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2,677.634 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
Down Restaurant);
i
2 2 0
i, , ,
Hotel 4.76972 1s 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e- 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 ,
i, , -----------------
561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103
i 564.4782
i, 003
i
'
--- - - - -+- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------' - - - - - - 4- - - - - - - n- - - - Quality 5.05775 + 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 i '
595.0298 595.0298 ' 0.0114 T
;
i 0.0109 598.5658
Restaurant +, ; ; ; 003
+, , , ,
Regional 0.251616 +1 2.7100e- - 0.0247 - 0.0207 - 1.5000e- - - 1.8700e- 1.8700e- - 1.8700e- 1.8700e- '
29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- - 5.4000e- 29.7778
Shopping Center ; +; 003 ; 004 003 003 003 003
i
i 004 , 004
1 1 1
'
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
8,355.983
0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
2 2
7 6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
774
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 i 0.0000 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 .,
i 50 50 92
Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 50 50 92
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- COP
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural 2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
a 0.0000 0.0000
Coating
.,
;
Consumer 24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000
i 0.0000 0.0000
Products
----------------4------4-------------- ----------------------------------- ----------------- -_______
-
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 T 1.1400 y + ----- -------
0.0000 18,000.00 18,000.00 0.3450 0.3300 T 18,106.96
'
'
. ,
s8 00 00 ' 50
.. ,
Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e- 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 1 148.5950 - 148.5950 - 0.1424 T 152.1542
003
j
Total
020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148'59
18,148.59
0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
F
50 50
92 775
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural 2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i 0.0000 0.0000
..
Coating •, , ,
'
.,
a
Consumer 24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
i 0.0000
Products
i i
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400
0.0000 18,000.00 ' 18,000.00 ' 0.3450 0.3300 ? 18,106.96 +
i 00 00 , 50
Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e- 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 T 0.4574 +
148.5950 148.5950 0.1424
+ 152.1542
003 ,
y
i ' ' ' '
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
18,148.59
0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
1 50
50 92
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
776
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Fire Pumps and Emeraencv Generators
IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
777
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
45.00 1000sgft
1.03 45,000.00
0 ----------------------------=------------------------------ -------------------------------I--------------- ------------------_---------------
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)
36.00 1000sgft
0.83 36,000.00
i 0
-----------------------------_------------------------------+-------------------------------I---------------I------------------T Hotel
50.00 Room
1.67 72,600.00
---------------
i 0
-----------------------------_------------------------------+-------------------------------I--------------- Quality Restaurant
8.00 1000sgft
0.18 ------------------T---------------
8,000.00
i 0
------------------------------_------------------------------+-------------------------------I---------------I------------------I Apartments Low Rise
25.00 Dwelling Unit
1.56 25,000.00
---------------
72 ------------------------------ _------------------------------ -------------------------------I---------------
Apartments Mid Rise
P
975.00
Dwelling Unit
g
?------------------
25.66 i.
975,000.00 '
2789
Regional Shopping Center
56.00 1000sgft
1.29 56,000.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban
Climate Zone 9
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CO2Intensity 702.44
(lb/MWhr)
Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33
Operational Year 2028
CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data
778
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.
Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.
Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.
Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.
Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.
Energy Use -
Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation.
Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.
Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWood Mass
1,019.20
1 0.00
----------------------------_-------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------- tblFireplaces FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 i 0.00
-------------P-------------_----------------------------- r-- -----------------------------+------------------------
tblFire laces NumberWood 1.25 i 0.00
-------------P------------------------------------------ r-----------------------------f-------------------------- tblFire laces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
-----------------------------_------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 i 10.00
----------------------------- _------------------------------ -----------------------------+-------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 1 10.00
----------------------------- _------------------------------ -----------------------------f-------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 1 10.00
----------------------------- _------------------------------ --------------------------------}-------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
-----------------------------_------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 i 10.00
----------------------------_------------------------------ -----------------------------t-------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 i 10.00
----------------------------- _------------------------------ -----------------------------F-------------------------- tblVehicleTri s ST_TR 7.16 i 6.17
------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 4-------------------------- tblVehicleTri s ST_TR 6.39 1 3.87
------------------------------ r------------------------------f-------------------------- tblVehicleTri s ST_TR 2.46 1.39
---------------------------- -------------- --------------- ------------------------------ +----_ ------------------- tblVehicleTri s ST_TR 158.37 79.82
779
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19 3.75
-----------------------------
tblVehicleTri s
4-----------------------------
ST_TR
'
4------------------------------ }--------------------------
94.36 1
63.99 ----------------------------
tblVehicleTri s
ST_TR
1 49.97
--------------
10.74 -----------------------------_-----------------------------%------------------------------} tblVehicleTri s
SU_TR
6.07 1
6.16 -----------------------------_----------------------------- tblVehicleTri s
SU_TR
r-----------------------------t--------------------------
5.86 1
4.18 ----------------------------------------------------------- tblVehicleTri s
SU_TR
----------------------------------------------------------
1.05 i
0.69 ------------------------------
tblVehicleTri s
SU_TR
-------------------------------- }-------------------------- 131.84 i
78.27 tblVehicleTri s
P
SU_TR
------------------------------t--------------------------
5.95 i
3.20 -----------------------------_----------------------------- tblVehicleTri s
SU_TR
r------------------------------}--------------------------
72.16 1
57.65 -----------------------------
tblVehicleTri s
_-----------------------------
SU_TR
r-----------------------------+--------------------------
25.24 i
6.39 -----------------------------
NVehicleTri s
------------------------------
WD_TR
------------------------------ t--------------------------
6.59 i
5.83 -----------------------------
tblVehicleTri s
_-----------------------------
WD_TR
r------------------------------}--------------------------
6.65 1
4.13 -----------------------------
tblVehicleTri s
_------------------------------
WD_TR
%------------------------------ +--------------------------
11.03 i
6.41 ---------------- -----------_----------------------------- tblVehicleTri s
WD_TR
r-----------------------------+-------------------------- 127.15
65.80 -----------------------------
tblVehicleTri s
_--------- ------------ -----
WD_TR
r-----------------------------t--------------------------
8.17 i
3.84 -----------------------------
tblVehicleTri s
_------------------------------
WD_TR
------------------------------ -}--------------------------
89.95 1
62.64 -----------------------------
tblVehicleTri s
_------------------------------
WD_TR
------------------------------}--------------------------
42.70 1
9.43 -----------------------------
tblWoodstoves
_-----------------------------
NumberCatal tic
r-----------------------------t--------------------------
1.25 0.00
-----------------------------_------------------------------ tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
------------------------------+--------------------------
48.75 i
0.00 -----------------------------_-------------------y tblWoodstoves
--------
NumberNoncatal tic
T-----------------------------t--------------------------
1.25 i
0.00 -----------------------------_----------------------------- tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
r------------------------------}--------------------------
48.75 I
0.00 -----------------------------------------------
tblWoodstoves
----------%-------------------------------}-------------------------- WoodstoveDay Year
25.00 i
0.00 -----------------------------
tblWoodstoves
---------------------------
WoodstoveDayYear
_-----------------------------+--------------------------
25.00 i
0.00 -----------------------------_----------------------- tblWoodstoves
-----
WoodstoveWood Mass
-------------------------------t-------------------------- 999.60 i
0.00 tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWood Mass
999.60
0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary
780
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021 4.2621 46.4460 31.4068 0.0635 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 ± 0.0000 6,154.337 • 6,154.337 1.9472 0.0000 6,203.018
i 7 7 ; ; 6
.. i
2022 4.7966 38.8851 39.6338 0.1195 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 i
0.0000 12,035.34 12,035.34 1.9482 0.0000 T
+ 12,060.60
i 40 40 ; 13
2023 4.3939 25.8648 37.5031 0.1162 7.0088 0.7598 7.7685 1.8799 0.7142 2.5940
0.0000 11,710.40 : 11,710.40 - 0.9617 0.0000 T
11,734.44
i 80 ; 80 97
i
_
2024 237.0656 9.5503 14.9372 0.0238 1.2171 0.4694 1.2875 0.3229 0.4319 0.4621 y _ _______ _______ _
0.0000 2,307.051 • 2,307.051 - 0.7164 0.0000 ? 2,324.962 i 7 7 7
'
Maximum
237.0656
46.4460
39.6338
0.1195
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,035.34
12,035.34
1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
40 40
13 781
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2021 4.2621 46.4460 31.4068 0.0635 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 i 0.0000 • 6,154.337 6,154.337 1.9472 0.0000 6,203.018
1 7 7 6
.,
_------------------ , , , ,
2022 4.7966 38.8851 39.6338 0.1195 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 1 ,
A 0.0000
12,035.34 12,035.34 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60
• ,&
40 40 ; ; 13
----------• ------�- - - - - - - -------�- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------T------ -�------- - - - - - - - - - - �
2023 4.3939 25.8648 37.5031 0.1162 7.0088 0.7598 7.7685 1.8799 0.7142 2.5940 i 0.0000 11,710.40 11,710.40 0.9617 0.0000 T 11,734.44
a 80 80 97
., , , , ,
+ ,
2024 237.0656 9.5503 14.9372 0.0238 1.2171 0.4694 1.2875 0.3229 0.4319 0.4621
0.0000 2,307.051 2,307.051 0.7164 0.0000
i 2,324.962
a
7 ; 7 7
t
' '
Maximum
237.0656
46.4460
39.6338
0.1195
18.2032
2.0456
20.2488
9.9670
1.8820
11.8490
0.0000
12,035.34
12,035.34
1.9482
0.0000
12,060.60
1 40
40 13
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Reduction
782
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust7M2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 ± 0.0000 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
i 50 50 ; 92
Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 + 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
2 , 2 7
----------------------------------- -------------r-------+ Mobile 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 '
47,917.80 47,917.80 2.1953 47,972.68
i 05 05 ; ; 39
1 ,
' ' '
Total
7872
202.7424
0.6043
45.9592
2.4640
48.4231
12.2950
2.4399
14.7349
0.0000
74,422.37
74,422.37
2.8429
0.4832
74,637.44
11-7777*
87 87
17 Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
INBio-777=21
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 + 0.0000 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
i 50 50 92
Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983- 0.1602 0.1532 8.405.638
i
i 2 2 7
i
Mobile 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45,9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 ____
47,917.80 47,917.80 2.1953 T47,972.68
i
+ 05 05 39
, 1
' ' '
Total
40.7912
67.7872
202.7424
0.6043
45.9592
2.4640
48.4231
12.2950
2.4399
14.7349
0.0000
74,422.37
74,422.37
2.8429
0.4832
74,637.44
11 1
1 87
87 17
783
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Reduction
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 •Demolition -Demolition
19/1/2021
:10/12/2021
' 5
30'
------------------------------------------------
1------------ ;
------------ 4
-------- 4
--------- I-------------------------
2 :Site Preparation :Site Preparation
1 10/13/2021
: 11/9/2021
5 : 20
--------------------------
4 ------------ 4
-------- 4--------T---
3 :Grading :Grading
111/10/2021
' 1/11/2022
' 5'
45'
--------------------------
4 ------------ 4
-------- 4--------T--
4 :Building Construction :Building Construction
11/12/2022
:12/12/2023
' 5'
500'
-------------------------------------------------------- I------------ 4
------------ 4---------I
--------- -------------------------
5 :Paving :Paving
112/13/2023 '1/3012024
' 5'
35'
----------------------------- -�----------------------- -------------'•------------I---------I-------- 11----------------------- - 6 -Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating
-1/31/2024 -3/19/2024
5-
35-
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft)
OffRoad Equipment
784
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter I Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition
:Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 --------------------------------------------------
F----------------
Demolition
• Excavators
3 -F
Demolition
�RubberTired Dozers
2 •-------------------------------------------------------- ----------------
Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 •----------------------------
:---------------------------F----------------
Site Preparation
•Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 •--------------------------------------------------------
F----------------
Grading
• Excavators
2 •----------------------------%---------------------------F---------------- Grading
•Graders
1 ---------------------------------------------------------
F-----------------
Grading
-Rubber Tired Dozers
1 ---------------------------------------------------------
F-----------------
Grading
:Scrapers
2 -----------------------------:---------------------------F----------------- Grading
•Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 ---------------------------------------------------------
F-----------------
Building Construction
:Cranes
1 •----------------------------=----------------------- ----F-----------------
Building Construction
:Forklifts
3 •-------------------------------------------------------- ----------------
Building Construction
:Generator Sets
1 ---------------------------------------------------------
F-----------------
Building Construction
•Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 •-------------------------------------------------------- ------------------
Building Construction
:Welders
1 -----------
----
Paving
• Pavers
2 --------------------------------------------------------F----------------- Paving
:Paving Equipment
2 --------------------------------------------------------F----------------- Paving
• Rollers
2 •-----------------------------------------
Architectural Coating :Air Compressors
Trips and VMT
8. 81:
0.73 --------- --
---------
8.00:
158:
0.38',
- - - - - - - - - - - - - F---------------------
----- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
8.00 247'
0.40 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F------ ------------
---Ir - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
8.00 ,
247'
0.40 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F----- - ------------
-- --- r
8.00 97 :
0.37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F------- ------------------ - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
8.00 -
158 :
0.38 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F--------- ---- ------------ r - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
8.00 ,
187 ;
0.41 ------------- ______--------------
8.00 -
247'
0.40 ------------- F----------------------------------
8.00 ,
367'
0.48 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F--- ----------------------� - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
8.00 .
97,
0.37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F------------------- --------------
7.00-
231:
0.29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F----- ------------------
8.00 -
89 0.20
-------------h
8.00-
84:
0.74 -------------F-
7.00 -
97 :
0.37 ------------- --------------
8.00,
46:
0.45 -------------F - --
---�--------------
8.00 -
130 :
0.42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F------------- ------------ - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
8.00 ,
132 :
0.36 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F--------- - ---------------- �
8.00. 80 :
0.38 ------------- 4--------------- -----------------
--
6.00 - 78
785
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length I Length I Length Class I Vehicle Class I Vehicle Class Demolition 6i 15.00,
0.001
458.0010.00;
6.90i
20.00iLD Mix
-
;HDT Mix
iHHDT
---------------�---------------I-----------I
Site Preparation 71
+----------%-----------
'---------�
-
18.00-
• I
0.001
0.00: 10.001
,
6.90'
20.00 LD Mix
-
'HDT Mix
'HHDT
?---------------I-----------I
�- .- I----------,-
i---------'---------- '---------
I--------------I--------
1 -
---I----------
Grading 8 j 20.00 -
0.00 i
0.00 . 10.00
6.90:
20.00 1 LD_Mix
1 HDT_Mix
HHDT
---------------- --------------- I -----------I----------- ---------- E----------- I---------- ;----------
I--------------
I----------T----------
Building Construction 91 801.00:
143.001
0.00: 10.001
6.90:
20.00-LD_Mix
1HDT_Mix
HHDT
----------------------------------------- I ----------
4---------- i-----------
'----------
'
Paving 61 15.00,
0.00:
0.00. 10.001
6.90:
20.001LD_Mix
1HDT_Mix
(HHDT
------------------------------ 4-------------------------------r----------- ----------I------------------------ ----------
Architectural Coating 1 160.00;
0.00. 0.00. 10.00.
6.90,
20.00;LD_Mix
;HDT_Mix
;HHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
3.2 Demolition - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total1
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 + 0.0000 0.0000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- i Off -Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 + 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3,774.317 i 9 9 4
1 Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419
3,747.944
3,747.944
1.0549
3,774.317
9 9
4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH47
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 + 1,269.855 1,269.855 0.0908 1,272.125
i 5 5 ; ; 2
------------ ------------- ---------------------------------- ------------- ------ ±
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
+
., , , , , , , , , ,
i , , , , ,
Worker 0.0532 0.0346 0.3963 1.1100e- 0.1141 9.5000e- 0.1151 0.0303 8.8000e- 0.0311 i 110.4707 110.4707 3.3300e- 110.5539
003 , 004 004
+ 003
' ' ' '
Total
0.1835
4.1800
1.4144
0.0128
0.3810
0.0137
0.3948
0.1034
0.0131
0.1165
1,380.326
1,380.326
0.0941
1,382.679
2 2
1 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
I
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 + 0.0000 0.0000 ., ,
Off -Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 T + 3,774.317
i 9 9 4
, , ,
Total
3.1651
31.4407
21.5650
0.0388
3.3074
1.5513
4.8588
0.5008
1.4411
1.9419 0.0000
3,747'944
3,747.944
1.0549
3,774.317
9 9
4 787
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
777771
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 + 1,269.855 - 1,269.855 0.0908 1,272.125
i 5 5 2
., , , , , , , ,_ , ,
i , , , ,
_ _
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 _ _ _ _ _ _ _,_
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i , 0.0000
., , , , , , , , ,
, , , ,
Worker 0.0532 0.0346 0.3963 1.1100e- 0.1141 9.5000e- 0.1151 0.0303 8.8000e- 0.0311 + 110.4707 110.4707 3.3300e- 110.5539
003 004 004
i ; 003
Total
0.1835
4.1800
1.4144
0.0128
0.3810
0.0137
0.3948
0.1034
0.0131
0.1165
1,380.326
1,380.326
0.0941
1,382.679
2 2
1 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
7 Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 Off -Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 i 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 i 9 9 3
i ' '
Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116
3,685.656
3,685.656
1.1920
3,715.457
9 9
3 788
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
---------- ------ ------ ------------------------------- ------------------ Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
+
., i i
_______-___:-------•-------;--------------'-------'-------;-------"------_•-------•p•--____-y_______ Worker 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e- 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- i
---------- ------n--------;-------T-------
+
0.0374
'
132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e- 132.6646
003 003 ; 003
1 003 ;
' '
t ' ' 1
Total
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
0.1369
1.1400e-
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
132.6646
003
003
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 i 0.0000 0.0000 _----------n--------------i------------------------------------------ -------T�- ------y"-•_---------;-------•---------------------- Off -Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 + 0.0000 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 i 9 9 3
1 i 1
' ' '
Total
3.8882
40.4971
21.1543
0.0380
18.0663
2.0445
20.1107
9.9307
1.8809
11.8116 0.0000
3,685.656
3,685.656
1.1920
3,715.457
9 9
3 789
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
7 Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i
Worker 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e- 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e- 132.6646
' 003 ; 003 ; ' 003 '
± 003 ;
'
'
Total
0.0638
0.0415
0.4755
1.3300e-
0.1369
1.1400e-
0.1381
0.0363
1.0500e-
0.0374
132.5649
132.5649
3.9900e-
132.6646
003
003
003
003
3.4 Grading - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 + 0.0000 0.0000 i i
Off -Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 - 6,007.043 1.9428 - ? 6,055.613 i
i 4 4 4
i
Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230
6,007.043
6,007.043
1,9428
6,055.613
4 4
4 790
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 A 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 _0 T__
- - - - - - -
�
0'__
+ � 0.0000 0.0000 0.00--00 � � 0-.0000_
.- - -
Worker 0.0709 0.0462 - 0.5284 1.4800e- 0.1521 - 1.2700e- - 0.1534 - 0.0404 - 1.1700e- - 0.0415 + i
-
- ' -
147.2943 - 147.2943 - 4.4300e- 147.4051
003 ; 003 003
003
-
Total
0.0709
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
0.1521
1.2700e-
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
147.4051
003
003
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 - 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 - 3.5965 + 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 - 1.8265 - 1.8265 0.0000 ? ± 6,007.043 - 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613
+ 4 4 4
- + 1
' '
Total
4.1912
46.3998
30.8785
0.0620
8.6733
1.9853
10.6587
3.5965
1.8265
5.4230 0.0000
6,007.043
6,007.043
1.9428
6,055.613
4 4
4 791
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
---------------------------------------------�---------- ----r------ ---------------------------------
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000000 0.0000 0.000000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000
+
------------
Worker 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e- ' 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e- 147.4051
003 ; 003 003 ;
y ' 003
' ' '
'
Total
0.0462
0.5284
1.4800e-
0.1521
1.2700e-
0.1534
0.0404
1.1700e-
0.0415
147.2943
147.2943
4.4300e-
147.4051
F0709
003
003
003
003
3.4 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 i 0.0000 0.0000 i
Off -Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 i 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015
i 5 5 8
1 1 a ' ' , '
Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006
6,011.410
6,011.410
1.9442
6,060.015
5 5
8 792
CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
I Total
INBio-72
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
..
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
.,
----------:------------------------------------------------- ----------------------±--------------�--------------r a
Worker 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e- 0,1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.0000e- 142.2207
003 003 003
+ 003
'
'
Total
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
0.1521
1.2300e-
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.000Oe-
142.2207
11 003
003
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 i 0.0000 0.0000 � � t
t
Off -Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 + 0.0000 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 + 5 5 8
i ' ' 1
Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
8.6733
1.6349
10.3082
3.5965
1.5041
5.1006 0.0000
6,011.410
6,011.410
1.9442
6,060.015
5 5
8 793
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
INBio-CO2
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
-------------------------------------------------------- -------T-------±-- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
+ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
,
---------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e- 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 + -------- ------
142.1207 142.1207 4.000Oe- 142.2207
003 ; 003 ; 003 '
, �
i '
, 003
' 1
' 1
Total
0.0665
0.0416
0.4861
1.4300e-
0.1521
1.2300e-
0.1534
0.0404
1.1300e-
0.0415
142.1207
142.1207
4.000Oe-
142.2207
003
003
003
003
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
77702e
Category
lb/day
Ib/day
Off -Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 + 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632
i 6 6 , 2
' '
Total
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
2,554.333
2,554.333
0.6120
2,569.632
F7062
1 1
6 6
2 794
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
________-'- ------- ------- ------- -------4------- 4------- -------i----------------------j---- Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 ---------------------
0.2881
+ 3,789.075 3,789.075 0.2381 3,795.028
t 0 0 ; ; 3
----------- -------;-------;--------------;-------;----------------------------T-------y--------------4-------7-------4--- Worker 2.6620 1.6677 19.4699 0.0571 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 -
T
+ 5,691.935 5,691.935 0.1602 5,695.940
i 4 4 8
i
' ' ' ,
Total
04 14.8350
23.2704
0.0926
7.0087
0.0749
7.0836
1.8799
0.0699
1.9498
9,481.010
9,481.010
0.3984
9,490.969
709
4 4
1 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
INBi.-77021
1 Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 i 0.0000 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632
a 6 6 2
� i
1 ,
Total
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
2,554.333
0.6120
2,569.632
177062
6 6
2 795
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
7M2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
------------------ ------------------------------------------- ------T------ +---____-_______ Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 _______ _
0.2881
3,789.075 3,789.075 0.2381 3,795.028
i 0 0 3
•__________ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------T-------i Worker 2.6620 1.6677 19.4699 0.0571 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 + ------- ;------- 4-------r------4-------T-------
5,691.935 - 5,691.935 0.1602
5,695.940
'
►
4 ; 4 8
+
' '
'790
Total
3.0904
14.8350
23.2704
0.0926
7.0087
0.0749
7.0836
1.8799
0.0699
1.9498
9,481.010
9,481.010
0.3984
.969
4 4
1 1
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 + 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406
s 9 9 , 1
'
Total
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
2,555.209
2,555.209
0.6079
2,570.406
1=5728
1 9
9 1
796
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
Pm
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
1 PM2.5
Total
Category
Ib/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
- - - - - - - - - - - I1------- 1------- 1------- 1------- 1------- .,------- 1------- 1------- - - - - - --,-------1-------1-------7
'--------------- +
Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3,3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 3,671.400 0.2096 ? 3,676.641
j
a 7 7 7
Worker 2.5029 1.5073 17.8820 0.0550 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,483.797 5,483.797 0.1442
+ 5,487.402
1 4 , 4 0
1 '
Total
11.4799
21.2591
0.0893
7.0088
0.0601
7.0688
1.8799
0.0557
1.9356
9,155.198
9,155.198
0.3538
9,164.043
F8211
1 1
7 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NB io- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 + 0.0000 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406
8 9 9 1
'
' ' ' '
Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
2,555.209
0.6077-7
2,570.406
1 9
9 1
797
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
.i i i
Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 + 3,671.400 3,671.400 0.2096 3,676.641
i 7 ; 7 , , 7
Worker 2.5029 1.5073 17.8820 0.0550 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 +
5,483.797 - 5,483.797 - 0.1442 5,487.402
4 4 ; 0
1 ' ' ,
Total
2.8211
11.4799
21.2591
0.0893
7.0088
0.0601
7.0688
1.8799
0.0557
1.9356
9,155.198
0.3538
9,164.043
1 19,155.198
1 7
3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 + 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 i 1 1 6
.� i i i
_ _ _ "'_ ' ' ' ' �___-___-_--------------r-___--
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
+ 0.0000
' i ' '
'
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694
2,207.584
2,207.584
0.7140
2,225.433
1 1
1 6
798
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
1 Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
s
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
+
Worker 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e- 0.1141 9.000Oe- 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 + 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- 102.7603
003 004 004 1
; 003 ;
'
Total
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
0.1141
9.000Oe-
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
102.7603
003
004
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
I
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 ± 0.0000 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 6 i 8
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 i
Total
1.0327
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.5102
0.5102
0.4694
0.4694 0.0000
2,207.584
2,207.584
0.7140
2,225.433
1 1
1 1
1 6
799
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NB io- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
. i
-------------------
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i i
..
Worker 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e- 0.1141 9.000Oe- 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- 102.7603
003 004 004
i
i ; 003
'
1 '
Total
0.0469
0.0282
0.3349
1.0300e-
0.1141
9.000Oe-
0.1150
0.0303
8.3000e-
0.0311
102.6928
102.6928
2.7000e-
102.7603
003
004
004
003
3.6 Paving - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NB io- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 + 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 i 2 2 ; 3
.. i
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 a 0.0000 0.0000 i
i
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310
2,207'547
2,207.547
0.7140
2,225.396
2 2
3 800
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
Ib/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
AA
-----------• ------------- ------ ---------------------------- �------ " '---------- ------- -------n---------------
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 j 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
j
i i
Worker 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.000Oe- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311
99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- 99.5663
003 004 ; 004 ;
Al
y 003
i i 1
Total
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.000Oe-
0.1141
8.8000e-
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.47OOe-
99.5663
003
004
004
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 i 0.0000 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 11 2 2 3
.. +
--------------------- ----------------------------------- ,------- r-------*-------------- -------,--------------- Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
+ 0.0000
1 ' 1 1
Total
0.9882
9.5246
14.6258
0.0228
0.4685
0.4685
0.4310
0.4310 0.0000
2,207.547
2,207.547
0.7140
2,225.396
2 2
3 801
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.6 Paving - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
JNBio-0O2
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i
Worker 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.000Oe- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311
99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- 99.5663
003 004 ; 004 '
+ ; 003
i i i
i i
Total
0.0444
0.0257
0.3114
1.0000e-
0.1141
8.8000e-
0.1150
0.0303
8.1000e-
0.0311
99.5045
99.5045
2.4700e-
99.5663
003
004
004
003
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 i i i i
Off -Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.97OOe- - 0.0609 - 0.0609 - 0.0609 0.0609 + 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 i
i
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
003
802
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
�_______
_---- -----I------- ------- --------------------------- ------ -------------------- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -y _
- ------------------ -
+ --- _
---0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i
Worker 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e- 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 j 1,061.381 1,061.381 0.0264 1,062.041
' 003 ; ' 003 j
a
8 8 ' 0
' t
' '
Total
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
0.3315
1,061.381
1,061.381
0.0264
1,062.041
003
003
8 8
0 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Elio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 i ___ i
_
Off -Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 T 281.8443 +
003
i
Total
236.5923
1.2188
1.8101
2.9700e-
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609
0.0609 0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0159
281.8443
003
803
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i
------.... -------------------- ' ---------------------------- ----- '
i---------------
Worker 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e- 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 ------- -
1,061.381 1,061.381 0.0264 1,062.041
003 ' 003 j
8 ' 8 0
1 ' '
Total
0.4734
0.2743
3.3220
0.0107
1.2171
9.4300e-
1.2266
0.3229
8.6800e-
0.3315
1,061.381
1,061.381
0.0264
1,062.041
003
003
8 8
0 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
804
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Bio-
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 1 47,917.80 47,917.80 2.1953 47,972.68 j 05 05 39
__ _ i i
Unmitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 • 47,917.80 2.1953 47,972.68 05 05 39
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Low Rise 145.75 154.25
t 154.00 506,227 506,227
• • • • • • • • • •Apartments
• ••--------------f----154.25 --
-
Apartments Mid Rise • 4,026.75- 3,773.25
4075.50 ,13,660,065
• _- --�
- ---------------------------------------------------
General Office Building 288.45 62.55
31.05 706,812 706,812
... ..:--------------F----------- t
---------
Hi h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant 2 368.80
g ( ) 2,873.52
2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937
...
- - - - - - - - -
--------- -
Hotel 192.00 187.50
....................................------------------------- •• F
t 160.00 - - 445,703 445,703
Restaurant 501.12 511.92
i 461.20 707,488 707,488
• • • . • • • • • • •Quality
• • ..........i--------------F--- -------- +
----------- _-------------------------
Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44
i 357.84 1,112,221 1.112,221
Total
8,050.95
8,164.43 1
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452
4.3 Trip Type Information
805
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass -by
Apartments Low Rise
14.70 5.90
8.70 40.20
19.20 i 40.60
86 11
3 .
......................r--------------------
Apartments Mid Rise
--------- r---
14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20
40.60 86
11 --
3 • . • .................�----------r---------�------_---------r--------- General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00
r------- ---.
19.00 77
19 -----
4 High Turnover (Sit Down
16.60 8.40
6.90 8.50
72.50 i 19.00
37 20
43 ........- ..'....:-- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - Y • - - - - - - -' -
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60
- _ • -
r ----------------�-------------------
1 19.00
58 38
- - - - - . -
4 Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00
19.00 38
18 44
•
. ......................
Regional Shopping Center
--
16.60 8.40
-r--------
6.90 7-----
16.30 --------
64.70 19.00
54 35
11 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD
OBUS
UBUS I MCY I SBUS I
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.543088• 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.033577i
0.0026131
0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712i
0.000821
Apartments Mid Rise
0.543088, 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691
General Office Building
0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712T
0.543088•
0.000821
0.044216i 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.0007121
0.000821
----------------
_ ------- -------- I -------- I -------- I -------- I -------- t-------- 4 -------- I -------- I -------- I --------4 --------* High Turnover (Sit Down
0.543088• 0.044216 : 0.209971 - 0.116369 , 0.014033 • 0.006332 • 0.021166 - 0.033577 - 0.002613 - 0.001817 - 0.005285 • 0.0007121
0.000821
Restaurant)
I
Hotel
-F-----------'r---------- --'r-----_____.t..__-_--------I------------- --t-------------- t------- ------ t------___--r-------------- -r-----------f------------- F
0.543088• 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712:
--------
0.000821
------------------------
Quality Restaurant
_-------- -------
0.543088• 0.0442161
0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.0007121
0.000821
-------
1 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------- -------- 4-------- -------- 4 - - - - - - -
Regional Shopping Center
0.543088• 0.044216 • 0.209971 • 0.116369 • 0.014033 • 0.006332 • 0.021166 • 0.033577 • 0.002613 • 0.001817 • 0.005285 • 0.000712 •
0.000821
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
mo
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 i 8,355.983 8,355.983 • 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 Mitigated j 2 2
j 7
• - - - - - - - - - - - •-------T------ T------ ------% ------T------ ------ T------ T--- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ NaturalGas 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 r8,355.983T8,355.983T 0.1602 T 0.1532 ? 8,405.638 Unmitigated 2 2
7 807
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2rBio-
CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low 1119.16 i 0.0121 0.1031 0,0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- + 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 132.4486
Rise i. ; 004 ; 003 003 ; 003 003
i ; 003 003
i,
"-"'""-"-""; ----------------------� --------------- -------------� ---------- Apartments Mid 35784.3 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 +
+ 4,209.916 4,209.916 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
Rise i, ; ; ,
i 4 4 9
__"________�__ " '"ii-------'+---------------------i-----------------------------------i-------8 General Office 1283.42 + 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e- 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 9.5600e- ------------------------ --------------T_______
150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e- 2.7700e- 151.8884
Building +; ; ; 004 ; 003 003 003 003
+ ; 003 003
i ; , ;
-----------------+---------------------------------------- 4------- 4------- 4-------4 ------T--- High Turnover (Sit 22759.9 +- 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 - 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 + 2,677.634 2,677.634 - 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
Down Restaurant); +, ; ; ,
i 2 2 0
Hotel 4769.72 + 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e- 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 i 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782
i, 003
+,
Quality 5057.75 + 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 __
i 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 T 598.5658
Restaurant ►, 003
i
, , , , , , , ,
+ , -------4----------------- , ,
Regional 251.616 + 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- i 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- - 5.4000e- 7 29.7778
Shopping Center ; i, 003 004 003 003 003 003
i 004 004
, '
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
8,355.983
0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
2 2
7 808
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Low 1.11916 +' 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- ' 8.3400e- ' 8.3400e- ' 8.3400e- ' 8.3400e- 1;
+ 131.6662 ' 131.6662 ' 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 132.4486
Rise ; 004 ' 003 ; 003 003 003
i ; 003 ; 003
1. . . . . . i . . .
i . i
Apartments Mid 35.7843 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 +
+ 4,209.916 ' 4,209.916 ' 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
Rise
4 4 '
3 9
. - _ _ _ . . . - .. r - - - - - - "--------------1--------------- 1------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ;------- ;------T - - - - - - - j General Office 1.28342 +' 0.0138 0.1258 ' 0.1057 7.5000e- ' 9.5600e- ' 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 9.5600e- - - - - - --,--------------7---------------T . . . . . _ . 150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e- ' 2.7700e- ' 151.8884
Building + ' 004 ' ; 003 ; 003 003 003
i 003 003
High Turnover (Sit 22.7599 b 0.2455 ' 2.2314 1.8743 ' 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 ' 2,677.634 ' 0.0513 ' 0.0491 '
Down Restaurant);
2,693.546
2 2
►.
0 + .�
--
----------- ------•----------------------------------'----------------4--------------4-------T-------i Hotel 4.76972 0.0514 0.4676 ' 0.3928 2.8100e- 0.0355 ' 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 ------- ------- ------- ______� ______
?
+'
+ 561.1436 ' 561.1436 0.0108 ' 0.0103 564.4782
+. 003
+
'
+.
Quality 5.05775 + 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 ' 595.0298 ' 0.0114 - 0.0109 r
+; ' +
598.5658
Restaurant 003
+.
Regional 0.251616 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- ' 1.8700e- 1.8700e-
29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- ' 5.4000e- 29.7778
+ +
Shopping Center ; +, 003 004 003 003 003 003 +
004 004
+, +
1 ' 1
Total
0.7660
6.7463
4.2573
0.0418
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
0.5292
8,355.983
8,355.983
0.1602
0.1532
8,405.638
2 2
7 6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
809
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO I S02 Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 jNBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total1
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 i 0.0000 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 + 50 50 92
• - - - - - - - m------------T------ + ------ T------ T------ T------ ------ + ------T------- � - - - - - - T------T------T------- - - - - - - - U
nmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 50 50 92
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
Pgi
PM2.5
Total
Subcategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural 2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i 0.0000 0.0000
Coating '
,
., ,
Consumer 24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
+ 0.0000 0.0000
Products
------------ --------4--------4---------------------------------- ------- 4------- 4------- ------ +
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 ____
0.0000 18,000.00 18,000.00 0.3450 0.3300 T 18,106.96
+
+ 00 , 00 50
- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - ;------- ,------- '-------•-------�------- '-------�-------�-------T----- - - - Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e- 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 - - - - - --�-------4----------------4---
+ 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 1 T 152.1542
003
y
i
' '
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
18,148.59
0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
50 50
92 810
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural 2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
+ 0.0000 0.0000
Coating
.,
i
y''....'''''n_______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______------- _______ T
Consumer 24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
------- ,------------------------------------------
± 0.0000 0.0000
., ,
Products •, , , , ,
y
., , ,
a , , ,
- _
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400
0.0000 18,000.00 18,000.00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
00 ; 00 50
i ,
Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e- 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542
003
y
1 , ' , 1
Total
30.5020
15.0496
88.4430
0.0944
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
1.5974
0.0000
18,148.59
18,148.59
0.4874
0.3300
18,259.11
50 50
92 7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
811
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Fire Pumps and Emeraencv Generators
IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
812
Attachment C
Local Hire Provision Net Change
Without Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MTCO2e)
Amortized (MT CO2e/year)
3,623
120.77
With Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e)
Amortized (MT CO2e/year)
% Decrease in Construction -related GHG Emissions
3,024
100.80
17%
813
EXHIBIT B
814
Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
S WA P E Litigation Support for the Environment
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
Principal Environmental Chemist
Education
SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: prose nfeldGBswape.com
Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling
Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.
M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.
B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.
Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years' experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.
Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from unconventional oil drilling operations, oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, and many other industrial and agricultural sources. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities.
Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at dozens of sites and has testified as an expert witness on more than ten cases involving exposure to air contaminants from industrial sources.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
June 2019
815
Professional History:
Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex HZO Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 — 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 — 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications:
Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.
Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous TYaste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.
Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113-125.
Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.
Cheremisinoff; N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 June 2019
816
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.
Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.
Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.
Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.
Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.
Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor -Quality -Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation's Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.
Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS-6), Sacramento, CA Publication 9442-02-008.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.
Water Environment Research. 13l(1-4), 247-262.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 June 2019
817
Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage 1111agazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.
Presentations:
Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.
Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.
Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground iVater Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States" Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring 11eeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVIL Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23r' Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium -Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23" Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 June 2019
818
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23r' Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and GG�ater. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual illfeeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHSAnnual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 — 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants — DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
Mealey's C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. 11ealey's Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Grater And Environmental Law Conference.
Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundtivater Trust.
Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.
Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.
Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 June 2019
819
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.
Diycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.
Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility, Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 June 2019
820
Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.
Teaching Exaerience:
UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.
National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.
National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.
California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.
UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.
University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.
U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.
Academic Grants Awarded:
California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.
Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.
Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.
Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.
King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.
James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round -up. 1996.
United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.
Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 June 2019
821
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS "Conti Perdido" Defendant.
Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles — Santa Monica Caro le-Taddeo-Bate s et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles — Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case: No 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112"' Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No C 12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. Oi9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 June 2019
822
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial, March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Jerry Dovico, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Valley View Sine LLC, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Doug Pauls, et al.,, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Richard Warren, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.
Civil Action NO. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015
In The Third Judicial District County of Dona Ana, New Mexico Betty Gonzalez, et al. Plaintiffs vs. Del Oro Dairy, Del Oro Real Estate LLC, Jerry Settles and Deward DeRuyter, Defendants
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 171h Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.
Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014
In the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma Tommy McCarty, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Oklahoma City Landfill, LLC d/b/a Southeast Oklahoma City Landfill, et al. Defendants.
Case No. 5:12-cv-01152-C
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2014
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 June 2019
823
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.
Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division Kyle Cannon, Eugene Donovan, Genaro Ramirez, Carol Sassler, and Harvey Walton, each Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. BP Products North America, Inc., Defendant.
Case 3: 1 0-cv-00622
Rosenfeld Deposition: February 2012
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2013
In the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Maryland
Philip E. Cvach, II et al., Plaintiffs vs. Two Farms, Inc. d/b/a Royal Farms, Defendants Case Number: 03-C-12-012487 OT
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2013
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 June 2019
824
EXHIBIT C
825
JJS WA P E Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
Litigation Support for the Environment
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
1640 5th St.., Suite 204 Santa
Santa Monica, California 90401
Tel: (949) 887-9013
Email: [email protected]
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
CEQA Review
Education:
M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.
B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.
Professional Certifications:
California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:
Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA's Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring.
Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques.
Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 — present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 — 2014; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 -- 2003); 826
• Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001— 2004);
• Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989- 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 — 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 — 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990—1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986—1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984—1986).
Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Anal
With SWAPE, Matt's responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. • Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA.
• Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of Perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.
• Expert witness on two cases involving MOE litigation. • Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. • Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant.
With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt's duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of Perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
2 827
• Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production -related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi -volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. 828
Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.
Executive Director:
As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.
Hydrogeology:
As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.
At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.
As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
829
Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.
Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote "part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.
EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor's investigations of waste sites.
With the National Park Service, Matt directed service -wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed -scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high -levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation- wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi -Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.
Policy:
Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA's national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region's 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy -making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. 5 830
Geology:
With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.
As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
Supervised year -long effort for soil and groundwater sampling.
Conducted aquifer tests.
Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.
Teaching:
From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students.
Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.
Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014.
Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.
EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.
Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.
0 831
Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.
Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter -Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.
Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.
832
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.
Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.
Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.
Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.
Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP-61.
Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup at Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.
Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL- contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
E-3
833
Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.
Other Experience:
Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009- 2011.
8 834
ORDINANCE NO. 419
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA
APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA
AND SG OPAL, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, TO ENABLE THE
DEVELOPMENT OF A 66-ROOM HOTEL, AND FUEL STATION/RETAIL STORE
PROJECT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. SG Opal, a California corporation ("Developer") proposes to enter into a development agreement with the City of Yucaipa (herein, the "Development Agreement"), which is attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit "A," in connection with the development of a commercial center that includes a fuel station with a 9,000 square foot building that includes a convenience store, quick service restaurant, and office space, fuel canopy with 16 fuel dispensers and an express carwash, and a 66-room hotel with a rooftop bar and restaurant, in the City of Yucaipa, and described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit `B," and incorporated herein by reference (the "Project").
Section 2. Government Code Section 65864 authorizes the City to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property in order to, among other matters: ensure high quality development in accordance with comprehensive plans; provide certainty in the approval of development projects so as to avoid the waste of resources and the escalation in the cost of housing and other development to the consumer; provide assurance to the applicants for development projects that they may proceed with their projects in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations and subject to conditions of approval, in order to strengthen the public planning process and encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the private and public economic costs of development.
Section 3. The Project, including this Ordinance and the Development Agreement, has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq. ("CEQA"), the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000, et seq.), and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines. The City Council, as part of this Development Agreement, has adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The City Council hereby finds and determines, in light of the whole record, and in its independent judgment, that the MND analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the construction of the Project that are the subject matter of the Development Agreement.
The mitigation measures set forth in the MND are made applicable to the Project through conditions of approval.
Section 4. On December 7, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Development Agreement. Notice of the time, place and purpose of the public hearing was duly provided in accordance with California Government Code Sections 65867, 65090, and 65091, and the City's ordinances. At the conclusion of the public -1-
835
hearing, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving the Development Agreement.
Section 5. On January 9, 2023, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Development Agreement. Notice of the time, place and purpose of the public hearing were duly provided in accordance with California Government Code Sections 65867, 65090 and 65091, and the City's ordinances.
Section 6. The City Council finds that the provisions of the Development Agreement are consistent with the City of Yucaipa General Plan and comply with its objectives and policies.
The Development Agreement is consistent with and implements the objectives of the General Plan policies, including but not limited to CDL-8.1, CDL-10.1, CDL-10.4, CDL-10.16, ED-1.1, ED-2.5, and ED-2.6.
Section 7. The City Council hereby approves the Development Agreement and authorizes the Mayor to execute the Development Agreement on behalf of the City.
Section 8. No later than ten (10) days after the effective date of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall record with the County Recorder a copy of the Development Agreement and the notice shall describe the land to which such contract applies.
Section 9. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a summary of this Ordinance to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City within fifteen (15) days after its passage, in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; and shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31 st) day after its passage.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this th day of , 2023.
-2-
836
ATTEST:
Kimberly J. Metzler
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
David M. Snow
City Attorney
Justin Beaver
Mayor of the City of Yucaipa
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Raymond A. Casey
City Manager
-3-
837
EXHIBIT A
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
838
EXHIBIT B
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
839
Development Agreement
CITY OF YUCAIPA
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City of Yucaipa
Attention: City Attorney
34272 Yucaipa Boulevard
Yucaipa, CA 92399-2434
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made by and between the City of Yucaipa, a California municipal corporation (the "City"), and SG Opal, Inc., a California corporation (the "Developer"). The City and Developer are individually referred to herein as a "Party" and collectively referred to as the "Parties."
RECITALS
This Agreement is made and entered into with regard to the following facts, each of which is acknowledged as true and correct by the Parties to this Agreement.
A. Developer is the fee owner of that certain real property located in the City of Yucaipa, California and described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
B. The City is owner of the Adjacent Property described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference
C. Developer desires to develop the Project (as hereafter defined) on the Property and a portion of the Adjacent Property.
D. Developer has applied to the City for approval of this mutually binding Agreement, pursuant to the provisions of the Development Agreement Regulations (as hereafter defined), Article 13 of Chapter 3 of Division 3 of the City of Yucaipa Development Code and other applicable laws.
E. In anticipation of the development of the Project, Developer has made or will make application to the City (in its governmental capacity) for certain approvals, entitlements, findings and permits required for the development and construction of the Project, including, without 840
Development Agreement
limitation: Site Plan Approval, Conditional Use Permit/Architectural Review and this Agreement.
F. The City Council has specifically considered the advantages and impacts of this Project upon the welfare of the City and believes that the Project will benefit the City.
G. This Agreement eliminates uncertainty in planning and provides for the orderly development of the Project in a manner consistent with the City's Zoning Regulations (as hereafter defined), the Applicable Rules (as hereafter defined) and the General Plan (as hereafter defined).
H. To provide such certainty, the City desires, by this Agreement, to provide Developer with assurance that Developer can proceed with development of the Project with the uses, density and other land use characteristics specified in the Project Approvals. Developer would not enter into this Agreement, or agree to provide the public benefits and improvements described herein, without the City's agreement that the Project can be developed, during the term of this Agreement, with the uses, density and other land use characteristics specified in the Project Approvals.
I. The City has determined that, as a result of the development of the Project in accordance with the Project Approvals and this Agreement, substantial benefits will accrue to the public.
J. The City has designed and constructed certain drainage improvements, with a total cost of over $14 million, within the Wilson Creek drainage area that have resulted in a revision to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that removes a portion of the Property from the floodplain/floodway allowing for further development of the Property.
K. On December 7, 2022, pursuant to the requirements of the Development Agreement Regulations, the Planning Commission of the City of Yucaipa conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit/Architectural Review and Developer's application for this Agreement. The Planning Commission also considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration (as hereafter defined) for the Project. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission recommending that the City Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Conditional Use Permit/Architectural Review for the Project.
L. On January 9, 2023, pursuant to the requirements of the Development Agreement Regulations, the City Council of the City of Yucaipa (the "City Council") conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Developer's application for this Agreement. -2-
841
Development Agreement
M. The City Council has found and determined that this Agreement is consistent with the City's General Plan and all other plans, policies, rules, and regulations applicable to the Project.
N. On January 9, 2023, the City Council reviewed and approved, after making appropriate findings, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (as hereafter defined) for the Project that contemplates this Agreement.
O. On January 9, 2023, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 419 approving this Agreement, and such ordinance became effective on 32023.
AGREEMENT
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority contained in the Development Agreement Regulations, as it applies to the City, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained and other valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Definitions. For all purposes of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided herein, or unless the context of this Agreement otherwise requires, the following words and phrases shall be defined as set forth below:
(a) "Adjacent Property" shall have the meaning set forth in section 11 (c) of this Agreement.
(b) "Applicable Rules" means the rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions, codes, guidelines, and officially adopted procedures and official policies of the City governing the use and development of real property, including, but not limited to, the City's Zoning Regulations and building regulations, adopted as of the Effective Date. Among other matters, the Applicable Rules set forth and govern the permitted uses of land, the density or intensity of use, subdivision requirements, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, parking requirements, setbacks, and development standards, the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, and the design, improvement and construction guidelines, standards and specifications applicable to the development of the Property, and the Developer Fees and Processing Fees applicable to the Project.
(c) "Building Permit" means a permit issued by the City pursuant to Title 15 of the Yucaipa Municipal Code to authorize construction of a building or other structure. "Building -3-
842
Development Agreement
Permit" shall not include a demolition permit or excavation and shoring permit, but shall include a foundation permit.
(d) "Business Day" means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or California or Federal holiday on which banks in the City are customarily closed. (e) "CEQA" means the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), as it now exists or may hereafter be amended, in conjunction with the State CEQA Guidelines (14. Cal. Code Regs. 15000 et seq) as it now exists or as may hereafter be amended.
(f) "Conditions of Approval" shall mean those conditions of approval imposed by the City in connection with the Project Approvals.
(g) "Developer Fees" shall mean those fees established and adopted by the City pursuant to Section 66000 et seq., of the Government Code of the State of California to offset the impact of development on the City's capital facilities, including, without limitation, development impact fees, affordable housing fees, traffic fees, infrastructure fee, linkage fees, exactions, assessments or fair share charges or other similar impact fees imposed on or in connection with new development by the City. "Developer Fees" do not mean or include Processing Fees. (h) "Development Agreement" or "Agreement" means this Agreement. (i) "Development Agreement Regulations" means Article 2.5 of Chapter 4 of Division 1 of Title 7 (Sections 65864 through 65869.5) of the California Government Code (as the same may be amended and/or re -codified from time to time), and the City's Regulations Establishing Procedures and Requirements for Consideration of Development Agreements, at Article 13 of Chapter 3 of Division 3 of the Yucaipa Development Code (Section 83.0301305 et seq.).
0) "Discretionary Action(s)" or "Discretionary Approval(s)" means an action which requires the exercise of judgment, deliberation or discretion on the part of the City, including any board, agency, commission or department and any officer or employee thereof, in the process of approving or disapproving a particular activity, as distinguished from a Ministerial Permit or Ministerial Approval (as hereafter defined).
(k) "Effective Date" shall mean the date this Agreement, fully executed, is recorded in the official records of the San Bernardino County Recorder. -4-
843
Development Agreement
(1) "General Plan" means the General Plan of the City, as it exists as of the Effective Date.
(m)"Gross Room Revenue" means revenue that is or would be subject to the transient occupancy tax imposed by the City pursuant to Chapter 3.20 of Title 3 of the Yucaipa Municipal Code as that Chapter exists on the Effective Date. (n) "Hotel" shall mean the hotel permitted to be constructed by the Project Approvals, and identified on the site plan set forth on Exhibit "C". (o) "Ministerial Permit(s)," or `'Ministerial Approval(s)" means a permit or approval, including, but not limited to, Building Permits, grading permits, shoring and excavation permits, demolition permits, zone clearances, and certificates of occupancy, which requires the City, including any board, agency, commission or department or any officer or employee thereof, to determine whether there has been compliance with Applicable Rules, statutes, ordinances, conditions of approval, and/or regulations, as distinguished from an activity which is included in the definition of Discretionary Action or Discretionary Approval. (p) "MND" shall mean the final Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the Project pursuant to CEQA.
(q) "Mortgage" means any mortgage, deed of trust, encumbrance, sale leaseback or other security interest encumbering all or any portion of the Property, given by Developer for the purpose of securing funds to be used for financing the acquisition of the Property or any portion thereof, the construction of improvements thereon and/or any other expenditures reasonably necessary and appropriate to develop and/or operate the Project. (r) "Mortgagee" means the holder of the beneficial interest under any Mortgage. (s) "Municipal Surcharge" means the fee paid pursuant to Section 10(d) of this Agreement.
(t) "Processing Fees" means all processing fees and charges required by the City that are applied uniformly to all construction or development related activity including, but not limited to, fees for land use applications, Building Permit applications, Building Permits, grading permits, shoring and excavation permits, hauling permits, encroachment permits, demolition permits, subdivision or parcel maps, lot line adjustments, street vacations, inspections, certificates of occupancy and plan check. Processing Fees shall not mean or include Developer Fees.
-5-
844
Development Agreement
(u) "Project" means the development project as described in the final MND, as modified by the Project Approvals.
(v) "Project Approvals" shall include, collectively, a Conditional Use Permit/Architectural Review for a proposed commercial center that includes a three-story 66 room hotel that is approximately 62,000 square feet in size, a 5,000 square foot convenience store/private office/quick service restaurant, a car wash, and gas station, and a Development Agreement approved by the City with respect to the Project and shall include any Subsequent Project Approvals (as hereafter defined).
(w) "Property" means the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. (x) "Public Improvements" means the construction of a Multi -Purpose Trail per City Standard No. 607-2 and the tie in of the proposed driveways from the project site with the existing streets and curb/gutter.
(y) "Reserved Powers" means the power and authority of the City to enact regulations and/or take Discretionary Action if the same is expressly found by the City to be necessary to protect residents of the City, those employed in the City, or visitors to the City, from a condition that is dangerous to public health or safety or if the same is required to comply with California or federal laws (whether enacted previous or subsequent to the Effective Date of this Agreement). Reserved Powers also include the power and authority of the City to enact regulations that apply generally to hotels, service stations within the City, including without limitation, regulations of hotel operations provided that such regulations do not impact the permitted density, height, or square footage of the Project permitted by the Project Approvals. (z) "Subsequent Land Use Regulations" means any change in or addition to the Applicable Rules adopted after the Effective Date of this Agreement, including, without limitation, any change in any applicable general or specific plan, zoning, subdivision, or building regulation, including, without limitation, any such change by means of an ordinance, initiative, resolution, policy, order or moratorium, initiated or instituted for any reason whatsoever by the Mayor, City Council, Planning Commission or any other board, agency, commission or department of City, or any officer or employee thereof, or by the electorate, as the case may be, which would, absent this Agreement, otherwise be applicable to the Project. (aa) "Subsequent Project Approvals" shall mean all further Discretionary Actions or Discretionary Approvals, Ministerial Permits and Ministerial Approvals required or requested with respect to the Project, including, without limitation, any tentative subdivision map. Following adoption or approval, a Subsequent Project Approval shall become a Project Approval.
W
845
Development Agreement
(bb) "Zoning Regulations" shall mean the official zoning regulations of the City adopted as of the Effective Date of this Agreement.
2. Recitals of Premises. Purpose and Intent.
(a) State Enabling Statute. To strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of California adopted the Development Agreement Regulations which authorizes any city to enter into binding development agreements establishing certain development rights in real property with persons having legal or equitable interests in such property. Section 65864 of the Development Agreement Regulations expressly provides as follows:
"The Legislature finds and declares that:
"(a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other development to the consumer, and discourage investment in and a commitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public.
"(b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic cost of development." Notwithstanding the foregoing, to ensure that the City remains responsive and accountable to its residents while pursuing the benefits of development agreements contemplated by the Legislature, the City accepts restraints on its police powers contained in development agreements only to the extent and for the duration required to achieve the mutual objectives of the Parties.
(b) The Project. The Developer intends to develop the Property and a portion of the Adjacent Property as described in the Project Approvals and the final plans submitted to the City, subject to the Applicable Rules, the Project Approvals, and the Conditions of Approval.
The Parties hereby agree that, subject to the exercise of the City's Reserved Powers, for the term of this Agreement, the permitted uses, the density and intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, parking requirements, setbacks, and development standards, provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes and location of public improvements, and the design, improvement, construction and other guidelines, standards and specifications applicable to the development and use of the Property and Adjacent Property shall be those set forth in the Project Approvals, the Applicable Rules and this Agreement, including -7-
846
Development Agreement
the Conditions of Approval. Subject to the exercise of the City's Reserved Powers, any Subsequent Project Approvals shall, at the election of Developer, be subject to the Applicable Rules or the rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions, codes, guidelines, and officially adopted procedures and official policies of the City at the time of such Subsequent Project Approval.
3. Property Subject to Agreement. This Agreement shall apply to all of the Property and the portion of the Adjacent Property that Developer is purchasing from the City.
4. Application of Agreement. This Agreement shall apply to the development and use of the Property and the portion of the Adjacent Property that Developer is purchasing from the City. Such development and use shall be in accordance with the Project Approvals and this Agreement.
5. Term of Agreement. The initial term of this Agreement shall commence on the Agreement Effective Date, and shall continue for ten (10) years. Notwithstanding the term set forth above, the obligation to pay the Municipal Surcharge pursuant to Section 10 shall continue indefinitely as provided in Sections 10 and 14.
6. Timing of Development. The Parties acknowledge that Developer cannot at this time predict when or if the Property and Adjacent Property will be developed. Such decisions depend upon numerous factors that are not within the control of Developer. Because the California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo (1984) 37 Cal. 3d 465, (the Pardee Case) that the failure of the parties therein to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over such parties' agreement, it is the Parties' intent to cure that deficiency by acknowledging and providing that, except as provided below, Developer shall have the right to develop the Property and portions of the Adjacent Property consistent with the Project Approvals and the Conditions of Approval in such order and at such rate and at such times as Developer deems appropriate within the exercise of its sole and subjective business judgment during the term of this Agreement. This provision shall be broadly construed to provide Developer the greatest amount of time and flexibility (in light of the Pardee Case and/or any other similar or distinguishing cases) as necessary or appropriate to permit Developer to complete the development of the Project irrespective of later adopted rules, regulations or initiatives which would otherwise restrict the Developer's time to complete the Project.
7. Permitted Uses; Density: Building Heights and Sizes; Required Dedications. The City and Developer hereby agree that the permitted uses of the Property and Adjacent Property, the density and intensity of such uses, the maximum heights and sizes of the buildings and improvements to be constructed on the Property and Adjacent Property, and the reservation and dedication of land for public purposes, if any, required in connection with the development of the Property and Adjacent Property shall be as set forth in and consistent with the Project Approvals, as they may be lawfully amended by Developer from time to time. Developer shall not cause or In
847
Development Agreement
permit any use of the Property and Adjacent Property that is not permitted by the Project Approvals, and shall not cause or permit the construction of any building or improvement that exceeds the maximum density, building heights and/or building sizes set forth in or otherwise required by the Project Approvals, as they may be lawfully amended by Developer from time to time.
8. Developer's Rights. Developer shall have and is hereby vested with the rights, during the term of this Agreement, including any extensions, to develop the Project as set forth in the Project Approvals, as they may be lawfully amended by Developer from time to time, all of which are hereby incorporated in this Agreement by reference.
9. Changes in Applicable Rules.
(a) Non -Application of Changes in Applicable Rules. The adoption of any Subsequent Land Use Regulations after the Effective Date of this Agreement, or any change in, or addition to, the Applicable Rules (other than changes in Processing Fees as provided in this Agreement), including, without limitation, any changes in the General Plan or the Zoning Regulations (including any regulation relating to the timing, sequencing, or phasing of the Project or construction of all or any part of the Project), adopted after the Effective Date of this Agreement, including, without limitation, any such change by means of ordinance, initiative, resolution, motion, policy, order or moratorium, initiated or instituted for any reason whatsoever and adopted by any board, agency, commission or department of the City, or by the electorate, as the case may be, which would, absent this Agreement, otherwise be applicable to the Project and which would conflict in any way with or be more restrictive than the Applicable Rules or Developer's entitlements under the Project Approvals, shall not be applied to the Project during the term of this Agreement unless such changes represent an exercise of the City's Reserved Powers.
(b) Changes in Uniform Codes. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, development of the Project shall be subject to changes occurring from time to time in the provisions of the City's building, mechanical, plumbing and electrical regulations which are based on the recommendations of a multi -state professional organization and become applicable throughout the City, including, but not limited to, the California Building Code, and other similar or related uniform codes.
(c) Changes Mandated by Federal or California Laws or Regulations. Changes in, or additions to, the Applicable Rules adopted or made operative on or after the Effective Date shall apply to the Project if such changes or additions are specifically mandated to be applied to developments such as the Project by applicable California or federal laws or regulations. If the City or Developer believes that such a change or addition required by California or federal law or regulation exists, then that Party shall provide the other Party hereto with a copy of such California or federal law or regulation and a statement of the nature of its conflict with the 91 848
Development Agreement
provisions of the Applicable Rules and/or of this Agreement. For the purposes of this Agreement, the City's determination as to the applicability of California or federal laws to the Project shall be final and conclusive.
(d) Changes in Processing Fees Under Applicable Rules. The Project shall be subject to any increase in Processing Fees imposed by the City, provided that such a change is applied on a Citywide basis.
10. Developer's Obligations.
(a) Conditions of Approval. Developer shall comply with the Conditions of Approval.
(b) Reimbursement of Project Approval Costs. No later than the thirty (30) days following the Effective Date, Developer shall reimburse the City for all of its costs to process the Project Approvals, including legal and environmental processing costs related to the Project Approvals and preparation of this Agreement, if any.
(c) Processing Fees. Developer agrees to pay all Processing Fees, including City plan check fees, building inspection fees, and permit fees, at the rate and amount in effect at the time the fee is required to be paid.
(d) Municipal Surcharge. Developer and any successors in interest, shall pay to the City as set forth below, in perpetuity, a percentage of the Gross Room Revenue generated by the Hotel (the "Municipal Surcharge").
(i) Amount of Municipal Surcharge. For a period of one (1) year after the initial occupancy of the Hotel, Developer shall pay to the City a Municipal Surcharge in the amount of one percent (1%) of the Gross Room revenue generated by the Hotel. After the initial one (1) year period, the Municipal Surcharge shall be two percent (2%) of the Gross Room Revenue generated by the Hotel. After the initial two (2) years period, the Municipal Surcharge shall be three percent (3%) if the Gross Room Revenue generated by the Hotel for as long as the Hotel exist.
(ii) Timing of Payment. The Municipal Surcharge shall be payable monthly, based on the actual Gross Room Revenue received during the month for which payment is to be made, at the same time and in the same manner as is required for payment of the City's transient occupancy tax imposed pursuant to Title 3, Chapter 3.20 of the Yucaipa Municipal Code, or its successor. -10-
849
Development Agreement
(iii) Acknowledgement. The parties acknowledge and agree that the Municipal Surcharge is not a tax or a levy by City.
(iv) Late Charges, Interest. If Developer fails to pay the Municipal Surcharge within ten (10) days after its due date, Developer shall pay a late charge in the amount equal to the greater of (a) $1,000, increased on the first day of each calendar year by the increase, if any, during the immediately preceding calendar year in the Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers for Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County, California as published by the U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (or any successor thereto); or (b) four percent (4%) of the Municipal Surcharge payment due but not paid. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that the amount of the costs and expenses that City will incur in the event the Municipal Surcharge is not paid when due is extremely difficult to calculate, and that the late charge set forth in the immediately preceding sentence is a reasonable, good faith estimate of such costs and expenses, but payment of such late charge shall not limit the City's remedies following any default by Developer under this Agreement. If any Municipal Surcharge, including any late charge, is not paid within ten (10) days after the date on which the Surcharge is due, then such Municipal Surcharge (including any late charge) shall bear interest, from the due date until paid, at the rate that is the lesser of (i) ten percent (10%), or (ii) the highest rate then permitted by applicable law.
(e) Hotel. Developer agrees that the Hotel shall be built (including construction design and materials used) and shall operate at the same or better standard (on an overall basis and in all material respects) as a typical suburban hotel appropriate for its site and location and shall include amenities such as, but not limited to, the following: designated reception area, exclusive facilities such as a fitness center and swimming pool, a designated breakfast area, and a variety of room amenities including cable or satellite TV and available in - room WI-FI.
(f) Utility Fees. Developer shall pay all Project -related utility fees, including but not limited to water connection fees and sewage treatment plant expansion fees. (g) Easement. Developer shall execute an access easement through the Project area to allow the City access to the remaining portion of the Adjacent Property that is not being purchased by Developer. The easement area shall generally begin at the proposed signalized intersection and go through the Developer's parking lot to the northeastern most boundary of the Project and tie in with the remaining City owned parcel. The easement area is generally depicted on Exhibit "D".
-11-
850
Development Agreement
(h) Developer agrees to submit necessary applications, including but not limited to a sign permit.
(i) Developer agrees that any future subdivision application submitted to the City for the Project shall be a standard subdivision map and not a vesting map. 0) Developer and its contractors shall carry out the design and construction of all private improvements on the Property and Adjacent Property and all Public Improvements in conformity with all applicable laws, including, without limitation, all applicable federal, state and local occupation, employment, prevailing wage, safety and health laws, rules, regulations and standards. Developer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City and other indemnified parties (as set forth in Section 18 below) harmless from and against any cost, expense, claim, charge or liability relating to or arising directly or indirectly from any breach by or failure of Developer or its contractor(s) or agents to comply with such laws, rules or regulations including, but not limited to, any failure of Developer or its contractors to comply with applicable labor or prevailing wage laws. Developer's indemnity obligations set forth in this Section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.
11. City Commitments.
(a) Export of Soil/Dirt.
(i) City agrees to grant to Developer and its contractors the right to haul away up to 40,000 cubic yards of excess soil/dirt from City projects ("Export Activities"), which soil/dirt the City seeks to dispose of, and only to the extent that such excess soil is available and not needed for any other purpose, to the Project site. Specifically the City will make available up to 40,000 cubic yards of soil/dirt for from the Wilson III Basin project site, from the future Dunlap Park site, or from the future housing project at the southeast corner of Oak Glen Road and Avenue E (collectively, "City Projects"). In consideration for the right to export the excess soil/dirt, Developer shall (1) obtain any necessary regulatory permits including City, County, and/or State permits, if necessary; (2) comply with all applicable mitigation measures from the Oak Glen Creek Specific Plan Final EIR as related to soil export; and (iii) conduct Export Activities from the City Projects at Developer's expense. In consideration for Developer removing the excess soil/dirt, the City agrees to reimburse Developer the lesser of 1) one half (1/2) of Developer's costs to transport the excess soil/dirt to the Project site ("Transport Costs"), or 2) $5.00 per cubic yard. Developer shall provide evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of City to establish the Transport Costs actually incurred by Developer for the Export Activities, and City shall reimburse Developer upon completion of the Export Activities, subject to verification of the Transport Costs. If eligible, reimbursement may be in the form of credits against Developer Fees owed by Developer to the City if soil/dirt is from an eligible Developer Fee Funded City project such as the Wilson III Basin Project. (ii) Developer shall be solely responsible for, and shall indemnify, defend (by counsel reasonably acceptable to City) and hold the City, its officials, officers, -12-
851
Development Agreement
directors, agents, employees, contractors and any other authorized person acting for or on behalf of the City (collectively, the "City Indemnified Parties") harmless from and against any and all costs, claims, losses, damages, causes of action and liability which may arise by reason of any occurrence attributable to or arising out of (1) Developer's entry upon and access to the City Projects, and (2) the loading and removal of the excess soil/dirt from the City Projects and all related Export Activities, including without limitation any claim or cause of action for injury to or death of any person, or damage to any property arising out of the loading and removal of the excess soil/dirt and all related Export Activities occurring during the term of this Agreement.
Developer's indemnity obligations shall apply to and cover the acts of any assignee of all or any portion of Developer's rights hereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Developer's indemnity obligation shall not include liability arising out of the intentional misconduct of the City Indemnified Parties. The provisions of this shall survive the termination of this Agreement. (iii) Developer shall obtain at its sole cost and expense, and keep in force during the term of this Agreement, commercial general liability insurance insuring the City and any assignee of all or a portion of Developer's rights hereunder, and naming the City as an additional insured against claims for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage, providing coverage in an amount not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence, covering the Export Activities and any repairs and refurbishment. Upon execution of this Agreement, Developer shall deliver to the City current certificates evidencing the existence and amounts of the insurance, and with the additional insureds required under this Section. Each policy shall contain an endorsement providing that it is not cancelable or subject to nonrenewal or reduction in coverage except after thirty (30) days prior written notice from the insurance company to the City. If Developer fails to obtain the required insurance, the City may (but shall not be required to) obtain such insurance and the cost thereof shall be payable by Developer to the City upon demand.
(b) Pursuant to the City's Capital Improvement Program, City agrees to install a four-way signalized intersection at the corner of Oak Glen Road and Colorado Street on or before June 1, 2023, subject to Permitted Delays pursuant to Section 32 of this Agreement; provided, however that the force majeure delay shall not delay the completion date beyond Dec 31, 2023. This signal was previously planned for and approved by the City Council as part of the Fiscal Year 2020/2021 Capital Improvement Program as it is part of Phase 1I of a street improvement project intended to improve Oak Glen Road between 14th Street and the I-10 Freeway. Phase I of the street improvement project, including the widening of Oak Glen Road, which was completed in 2017.
(c) The City agrees to convey to Developer a portion of the Adjacent Property" described on Exhibit "B" through a separate Purchase and Sale Agreement. Developer agrees to pay to the City, the appraised value of $4.98 per square foot for the portion of the Adjacent Property it is purchasing from the City. Developer will submit to the City a site plan which sets forth the portion of the Adjacent Property needed for the Project (currently estimated at 39,150 square feet). On , 2022, the City Council declared the Adjacent Property to be exempt surplus land pursuant to Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(E). -13-
852
Development Agreement
12. Issuance of Building Permit. The City shall be under no obligation to issue a Building Permit for any portion of the Project until: (i) all the fees and other obligations set forth in Section 10 and due prior to or concurrent with issuance of the Building Permit have been fully paid or otherwise fulfilled or satisfied; and (ii) any lender whose lien is prior and superior to any conveyance or covenant required by this Agreement shall have agreed to subordinate its lien to the conveyances and covenants created and required by this Agreement.
13. Default. Failure by City or Developer to perform any term or provision of this Agreement for a period of thirty (30) days from the receipt of written notice thereof from the other shall constitute a default under this Agreement, subject to extensions of time by mutual consent in writing. Said notice shall specify in detail the nature of the alleged default and the manner in which said default may be satisfactorily cured. If the nature of the alleged default is such that it cannot reasonably be cured within such thirty (30) day period, the commencement of the cure within such time period and the diligent prosecution to completion of the cure shall be deemed a cure within such period.
Subject to the foregoing, after notice and expiration of the thirty (30) day period without cure, the notifying party, at its option, shall have all rights and remedies provided by law and/or may give notice of intent to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Government Code Section 65868. Following such notice of intent to terminate, the matter shall be scheduled for consideration and review by the City Council within thirty (30) calendar days in the manner set forth in Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868. Following consideration of the evidence presented in said review before the City Council and a determination that a default exists, the Party alleging the default by the other Party may give written notice of termination of this Agreement to the other Party. Upon any such termination, the respective rights, duties and obligations of the Parties hereto shall without further action cease as of the date of such termination (except as to duties and obligations that arose prior to the date of such termination).
In no event shall monetary damages be available against the City for any alleged default or breach by the City. In no event shall consequential damages be available against Developer or any seller of any portion of the Property for any alleged default or breach of this Agreement.
14. Termination and Expiration. Upon the expiration of the term or termination of this Agreement, the vested rights provided by this Agreement shall terminate and be of no further force or effect. However, such expiration or termination shall not affect Developer's obligations under Subsections 10(b), 10(c) or 10(d), nor the obligation to pay any claim of any Party hereto arising out of the provisions of this Agreement prior to the effective date of such termination provided that a Building Permit has been issued for any portion of the Project. After a Building Permit has been issued for any portion of the Project, the obligations under Section 10, and the obligation to pay any claim arising before the effective date of expiration or termination shall continue after termination in perpetuity or until completed.
15. Transfers of Interests in Property r Agreement. In the event of a proposed transfer of interest in the Property or Adjacent Property or in this Agreement by Developer to a -14-
853
Development Agreement
transferee, Developer agrees to provide the City at least thirty (30) days written notice of such proposed transfer and shall provide satisfactory evidence that the transferee will assume in writing through an assignment and assumption agreement all remaining obligations of Developer under this Agreement. The assignment and assumption agreement shall be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney. However, Developer has no obligation to obtain the consent of the City to assign this Agreement to a transferee. Notwithstanding the foregoing: (i) the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon any transferee whether or not such an assignment and assumption agreement is signed by the assignee upon acquiring the Property or Adjacent Property, or any portions thereof; and (ii) no such transfer shall relieve Developer (transferor) of any obligations under this Agreement unless: (A) at least thirty (30) days before any transfer, Developer has submitted to City the name of the proposed transferee and financial information regarding the transferee reasonably satisfactory to the City's Chief Financial Officer, and the City determines, prior to transfer, that the proposed transferee is able to satisfactorily fulfill the obligations of this Agreement, and (B) the transferee accepts, in writing, the obligations of Developer under this Agreement. Such writing shall be in form and content reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney.
16. Mortgagee Protection.
(a) In General. The provisions of this Agreement shall not prevent or limit Developer's right to encumber the Property or the portion of the Adjacent Property it purchases from the City, or any portions thereof or any improvement thereon by any mortgage, deed of trust or other security device securing financing with respect to such portion. The City acknowledges that Mortgagees may require certain interpretations and modifications of this Agreement and agrees upon request, from time to time, to meet with Developer and representatives of such Mortgagees to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation or modification. The City shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such requested interpretation or modification provided such interpretation or modification is consistent with the intent and purposes of this Agreement and does not, in the City's sole determination, diminish the City's benefits from this Agreement or the security for those benefits. Any Mortgagee shall be entitled to the rights and privileges set forth in this Section. (b) Notice of Default to Mortgagee. If a Mortgagee has submitted a request in writing to City in the manner specified herein for giving notices, the City shall exercise its best efforts to provide to such Mortgagee written notification from the City of any failure or default by Developer in the performance of Developer's obligations under this Agreement, which notification shall be provided to such Mortgagee at such time as such notification is delivered to Developer.
(c) Right of Mortgagee to Cure. Any Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure any failure or default by Developer during the cure period allowed Developer under this Agreement, plus an additional sixty (60) days if, in order to cure such failure or default, it is necessary for the Mortgagee to obtain possession of the Property or Adjacent -15-
854
Development Agreement
Property such as by seeking the appointment of a receiver or other legal process. Any Mortgagee that undertakes to cure or attempt to cure any such failure or default shall provide written notice to the City that it is undertaking efforts of such a nature; provided that no initiation of any such efforts by a Mortgagee shall obligate such Mortgagee to complete or succeed in any such curative efforts.
(d) Liability for Past Defaults or Obligations. Subject to the foregoing, any Mortgagee, including the successful bidder at a foreclosure sale, who comes into possession of the Project or the Property or Adjacent Property or any part thereof pursuant to foreclosure, eviction or otherwise, shall take such property subject to the terms of this Agreement and in no event shall any such property be released from any obligations associated with its use and development under the provisions of this Agreement. Nothing in this Section shall prevent City from exercising any remedy it may have for a default under this Agreement, provided, however, that in no event shall such Mortgagee personally be liable for any defaults or monetary obligations of Developer arising prior to acquisition of possession of such property by such Mortgagee.
17. Binding Effect. All of the provisions, agreements, rights, powers, standards, terms, covenants and obligations contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties and their respective heirs, successors (by merger, reorganization, consolidation or otherwise) and assigns, devisees, administrators, representatives, lessees, and all other persons acquiring the Property or Adjacent Property, or any portion thereof, or any interest therein, whether by operation of law or in any manner whatsoever, and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. All of the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute covenants running with the land.
18. Indemnification.
(a) Developer agrees to and shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend, the City and its respective officers, officials, members, agents, employees, and representatives, from liability or claims for death or personal injury and claims for property damage which may arise from the acts, errors, and/or omissions of Developer or its contractors, subcontractors, agents, employees or other persons acting on its behalf in relation to the Project and/or in any manner arising from this Agreement. The foregoing indemnity applies to all deaths, injuries, and damages, and claims therefor, suffered or alleged to have been suffered by reason of the acts, errors, and/or omissions referred to in this Section 18, regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied, or approved plans or specifications, or both. In the event of litigation, the City agrees, at no cost to the City, to cooperate with Developer. This indemnification, hold harmless and defense requirement shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.
The City reserves the right, in cases subject to this or any other -indemnity contemplated by this Agreement, to reasonably approve the attorney selected by Developer to defend Developer and the City in any such action.
-16-
855
Development Agreement
(b) In the event of any court action or proceeding challenging the validity of this Agreement, any of the Project Approvals or the MND prepared and adopted for the Project, Developer shall defend, at its own expense, the action or proceeding. In addition, Developer shall reimburse the City for the City's costs in defending any court action or proceeding challenging the validity of this Agreement, any of the Project Approvals or the MND and Developer shall also pay any award of costs, expenses and fees that the court having jurisdiction over such challenge makes in favor of any challenger and against the City. Developer shall cooperate with the City in any such defense as the City may reasonably request and may not resolve such challenge without the agreement of the City. In the event Developer fails or refuses to reimburse the City for its cost to defend any challenge to this Agreement, the Project Approvals or the MND, the City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, subject to the notice and cure requirements of Section 13 above. In all events, the City shall have the right to resolve any challenge in any manner, in its sole discretion, provided, however, Developer's consent shall be required if the resolution of the challenge shall require a payment by Developer or limit Developer's rights under this Agreement. Additionally, in the event of any litigation or referendum initiated by third parties to attack, set aside, modify, void or annul this Agreement, any of the Project Approvals, or the MND (a "Challenge"), the term of this Agreement shall be tolled for the period during which such Challenge is proceeding until fully and finally resolved.
In order to ensure compliance with this Section 18(b), within twenty (20) days after notification by the City of the filing of any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void or annul this Agreement, any of the Project Approvals or the MND prepared and adopted for the Project, Developer shall deposit with the City cash or other security in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00), satisfactory in form to the City Attorney, guaranteeing indemnification or reimbursement to the City of all costs related to any action triggering the obligations of this Section. If the City is required to draw on that cash or security to indemnify or reimburse itself for such costs, Developer shall restore the deposit to its original amount within fifteen (15) days after notice from the City. Additionally, if at any time the City Attorney determines that an additional deposit or additional security up to an additional fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) is necessary to secure the obligations of this section, Developer shall provide such additional security within fifteen (15) days of notice from the City Attorney. The City shall promptly notify Developer of any claim, action or proceeding within the scope of this Section and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of any such claim or action, but shall have the right to resolve any challenge, in any manner, in its sole discretion, provided, however, Developer's consent shall be required if the resolution of the challenge shall require a payment by Developer or limit Developer's rights under this Agreement.
19. Relationship of the Parties. The Parties acknowledge and agree that Developer is not acting as an agent, joint venturer or partner of the City, but each is, in fact, an independent contractual party and not in any way under the control or direction of the City except as is expressly provided to the contrary in this Agreement.
20. Recordation. As provided in Government Code Section 65868.5, the City Clerk shall record a copy of this Agreement with the Registrar -Recorder of the County of San Bernardino -17-
856
Development Agreement
within ten (10) days following its execution by both Parties. Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs of such recording, if any.
21. No Third Party Beneficiaries. The only signatories to this Agreement are the City and Developer. There are no third party beneficiaries and this Agreement is not intended and shall not be construed to benefit or be enforceable by any other person whatsoever other than the successors in interest of the signatories.
22. Advice. Neutral Interpretation. Each Party has received independent legal advice from its attorneys with respect to the advisability of executing this Agreement and the meaning of the provisions hereof. This Agreement has been drafted through a joint effort of the Parties and their counsel and therefore shall not be construed against either of the Parties in its capacity as draftsperson, but in accordance with its fair meaning.
23. Certificate of Compliance. At any time during the tern of this Agreement, any Mortgagee or other party may request any Party to this Agreement to confirm that (i) this Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect (or if there have been modifications hereto, that this Agreement is in full force and effect as modified and stating the date and nature of such modifications) and that (ii) to the best of such Party's knowledge, no defaults exist under this Agreement or if defaults do exist, to describe the nature of such defaults and (iii) any other information reasonably requested. Each Party hereby agrees to provide a certificate to such lender or other party within ten (10) Business Days of receipt of the written request therefor.
24. Consideration. The City and Developer acknowledge and agree that there is good, sufficient and valuable consideration flowing to the City and to Developer pursuant to this Agreement as more particularly set forth in the Recitals and Section 2 of this Agreement. The Parties further acknowledge and agree that the exchanged consideration hereunder is fair, just and reasonable.
25. Periodic Reviews.
(a) Annual Reviews. The City shall conduct annual reviews to determine whether Developer is acting in good faith compliance with the provisions of this Agreement and the Development Agreement Regulations. The reasonable cost of each annual review conducted during the term of this Agreement shall be reimbursed to the City by Developer. Such reimbursement shall include all direct and indirect expenses reasonably incurred in such annual reviews.
(b) Special Reviews. In addition, the City Council of the City may order a special periodic review of Developer's compliance with this Agreement at any time. The cost of such special reviews shall be borne by the City, unless such a special review demonstrates that -18-
857
Development Agreement
Developer is not acting in good faith compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In such cases, Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs, direct and indirect, incurred in conjunction with such a special review.
(c) Procedure for Review. The City's Director of Community Development (the "Community Development Director") shall conduct the review contemplated by this Section 25 to ascertain whether Developer has complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement during the period for which the review is conducted. The Community Development Director shall give Developer written notice that any such review has been commenced, and shall give Developer at least twenty (20) days after Developer's receipt of such notice to provide to the Community Development Director such information as Developer deems relevant to such review. In addition, upon the written request of the Community Development Director, Developer shall furnish such documents or other information as requested by the Community Development Director.
(d) Result of Review. If, following such a review, the Community Development Director finds good faith compliance by Developer with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Community Development Director shall issue to Developer an executed certificate of compliance, certifying Developer's good faith compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement through the period of such review. Such certificate shall be in recordable form, and shall contain such information as may be necessary to impart constructive record notice of the finding of good faith compliance hereunder. Developer shall have the right to record such certificate of compliance in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino.
If, following such a review, the Community Development Director finds that Developer has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Community Development Director shall specify in writing the respects in which Developer has failed to so comply. The Community Development Director shall provide Developer with written notice of such noncompliance as provided in Section 13 and the City may follow the default procedures as set forth in Section 13.
(e) Effect on Default Procedures. Nothing in this Section 25 shall be interpreted to prevent the City from providing Developer with a notice of default hereunder at any time, including any time other than during a periodic review under this Section 25, or from terminating this Agreement pursuant to the provisions of Section 13 following any event of default by Developer.
26. Future Litigation Expenses.
(a) Payment of Prevailing Party If the City or Developer brings an action or proceeding (including, without limitation, any motion, order to show cause, cross -complaint, counterclaim, third -party claim or arbitration proceeding) by reason of default, breach, tortious -19-
858
Development Agreement
act, or act or omission, arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to its costs and expenses of suit including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and expert witness fees.
(b) Scope of Fees. Attorneys' fees under this Section shall include attorneys' fees on any appeal and, in addition, a party entitled to attorneys' fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with such action. In addition to the foregoing award of attorneys' fees to the prevailing party, the prevailing party in any lawsuit shall be entitled to its attorneys' fees incurred in any post judgment proceedings to collect or enforce the judgment. This provision is separate and several and shall survive the merger of this Agreement into any judgment on this Agreement.
27. Headings. The section headings used in this Agreement are for convenient reference only and shall not be used in construing this Agreement. The words "include," "including" or other words of like import are intended as words of illustration and not limitation and shall be construed to mean "including, without limitation."
28. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended from time to time, in whole or in part, by mutual written consent of the Parties or their successors in interest, as follows:
(i) City and Developer, by mutual agreement, may terminate or amend the terms of this Agreement, and the amendment or termination shall be accomplished in the manner provided under California law for the enactment of Development Agreement amendments. (ii) Except as may be otherwise agreed to by the Parties, no amendment of this Agreement shall be required in connection with the issuance of any Subsequent Project Approval. Any Subsequent Project Approval issued after the Effective Date of this Agreement automatically shall be incorporated into this Agreement and vested hereby.
29. Alterations. No alteration, amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless evidenced by a written instrument executed by the parties hereto with the same formality as this Agreement, and made in the manner required by the Development Agreement Regulations.
30. Waiver. The failure of either Party hereto to insist in any one or more instances upon the strict performance of any of the covenants, agreements, terms, provisions or conditions of this Agreement, or to exercise any election or option herein contained, shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment for the future of such covenant, agreement, term, provision, condition, election or option, but the same shall continue and remain in full force and effect. No waiver by any Parry hereto of any covenant, agreement, term, provision or condition of this Agreement -20-
859
Development Agreement
shall be deemed to have been made unless expressed in writing and signed by an appropriate official or officer on behalf of such Party.
31. Severability. If any article, section, subsection, term or provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any party or circumstance, shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the article, section, subsection, term or provision of this Agreement, or the application of the same to parties or circumstances other than those to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each remaining article, section, subsection, term or provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
32. Force Majeure. Performance by any Party of its obligations hereunder (other than for payment of money) shall be excused during any period of "Permitted Delay," which Permitted Delay shall mean and include delay caused by an event beyond the reasonable control of the Party claiming the delay (and despite the good faith efforts of such Party) that prevents the Party from fulfilling the obligations for which it seeks excuse including without limitation all of the following to the extent that they prevent the Party claiming delay from fulfilling the obligation from which it seeks to be excused: acts of God; civil commotion; riots; strikes; picketing or other labor disputes; shortages of materials or supplies that impact Developer's actual ability to obtain the necessary materials or supplies necessary to construct the Project; damage to work in progress by reason of fire, floods, earthquake or other casualties; failure, delay or inability of the other Party to act; terrorism, and litigation brought by a third party attacking the validity of this Agreement, the Project Approvals or the MND.
33. Notices. All notices, disclosures, demands, acknowledgments, statements, requests, responses and other communications (each, a "Communication") to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing, signed by a signatory hereto (or an officer, agent or attorney of such party) giving such Communication, and shall be deemed effective (i) upon receipt if hand delivered or sent by overnight courier service; or (ii) upon delivery or the date of refusal if sent by the United States mail, postage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, in either case addressed as follows:
To Developer: SG Opal, Inc.
1462 Crestview Road
Redlands CA 92374
Attn: Pankaj Patel
With Copy to: Mirau, Edwards, Cannon, Lewin & Tooke
P.O. Box 9058
Redlands, CA 92375-2258
Attn: John K. Mirau, Esq.
To City: City Manager
City of Yucaipa
-21-
860
Development Agreement
34272 Yucaipa Boulevard
Yucaipa, CA 92399-2434
With Copy to: David Snow
City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
350 South Grand Avenue, 37th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Any signatory hereto may from time to time, by notice given to the other signatories hereto pursuant to the terms of this Section 33 change the address to which communications to such signatory are to be sent or designate one or more additional persons or entities to which communications are to be sent.
34. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of California.
35. Jurisdiction and Venue. Any action at law or in equity arising under this Agreement or brought by a party hereto for the purpose of enforcing, construing or determining the validity of any provision of this Agreement shall be filed and tried in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, and the parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for the filing, removal or change of venue to any other court.
36. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and every term or performance hereunder. Any Developer's obligation that is contingent upon an action of the City shall be tolled for the period of time of any unusual delay in the City's completion of its prerequisite action, excluding any delays resulting from the failure of Developer to process any applications diligently or fulfill other requirements necessary to enable the City to complete its prerequisite action.
37. Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior understanding or written or oral agreements between the Parties hereto respecting the within subject matter and contains the entire understanding between the Parties with respect thereto.
38. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
39. Compliance With Law. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement, the Parties agree to comply with all federal, state and local laws and to act in good faith and reasonably in carrying out the terms of this Agreement.
-22-
861
Development Agreement
40. Authorization. Each person executing this Agreement represents and warrants that he or she is authorized and has the legal capacity to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the Party f'or which execution has been made.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Agreement as of the day of , 2023.
ATTEST:
Kim J. Metzler
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DAVID M. SNOW
City Attorney
CITY OF YUCAIPA,
A Municipal Corporation
Mayor of the City of
Yucaipa, California
SEAL)
-23-
SG OPAL, INC., a California corporation
Name: Pankaj Patel
Its: President
By:
Name:
Its:
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
RAYMOND CASEY
City Manager
862
Development Agreement
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The Property situated in the State of California, County of San Bernardino, City of Yucaipa described as follows:
PARCEL MAP 2221 PARCEL 1
-24-
863
Development Agreement
EXHIBIT "B"
ADJACENT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
a
::;
I�
CITY OWNED PROPERTY
-25-
CITY OWNED PROPERTY
BEING SOLD. ESTIMATED
AT 39.150 SQUARE FEET
864
EXHIBIT "C"
PROJECT SITE PLAN
: ,,
EXHIBIT "D"
CONCEPTUAL ACCESS EASEMENT DEPICTION
CITY OWNED PROPERTY
866
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1
UTILITIES SERVING THIS LOCATION
ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, TELEPHONE:
ELECTRIC:
SEWER:
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
VERIZON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
YUCAIPA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
15 REDLANDS PLAZA
287 TENNESSEE STREET
1 22702ND STREET
REDLANDS, CA 92373
REDLANDS, CA 92373
YUCAIPA, CA 92399
PARCEL 1 OF MAP 2221, IN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PH: (909) 793-7511
PH: (909) 335-7191
PH: (909) 797-5117
MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 19, PAGE 96, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
CABLE TELEVISION:
GAS:
WATER:
TIME WARNER
THE GAS CO.
WESTERN HEIGHTS WATER COMPANY
SAID DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINING 102,263 SQ. FT., MORE OR LESS 1971 W. REDLANDS BLVD.
1981 LUGONIA AVENUE
32352 AVENUE D
REDLANDS, CA 92374
REDLANDS, CA 92373
YUCAIPA, CA 92399
PH: (888) 892-2253
PH: (909) 793-2725
PH: (909) 790-1901
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 2
BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 2 AND 3 OF COOK'S SUBDIVISION PER MAP BOOK 19 OF MAPS, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF
OVERLAY DISTRICTS
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION:
(CS) SERVICES -COMMERCIAL
SCENIC HIGHWAY DESIGNATION:
YUCAIPA SCENIC HWY. & RESOURCE OVERLAY
BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 2221, PARCEL MAP BOOK 19, PAGE 96 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF WILSON CREEK AS TRANS. NETWORK DESIGNATION:
MAJOR HIGHWAY
SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 00-072 BOOK 114, PAGES 53-60 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; NOISE OVERLAY AREA:
65+ dba FUTURE NOISE LEVEL AREA
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY THROUGH A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVING A FIRE SAFETY OVERLAY AREA:
AREA 2 (FR2)
RADIAL BEARING WHICH BEARS N 15914'19" W, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28946'25", A RADIUS OF 1060.00 FEET, A LENGTH OF 532.33 FEET;
FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY AREA:
PARTIAL AREA 2 (500 YR. FLOOD AREA)
THENCE S 48257'20" E 28.25' TO A POINT WHICH IS 44.00 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OF OAK GLEN ROAD PER IMPROVEMENT LEVEL AREA:
LEVELS 1 & 2
SAID RECORD OF SURVEY, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIAL BEARING OF N 48257'54" W, A RADIUS OF 1584.99 FEET; 2072
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTERLINE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF X ' 6 7953'44' AND A LENGTH OF 218.42 FEET; 2070 •x
THENCE CONTINUING PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTERLINE S 48955'50" W 378.58 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 806.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18209'35" A LENGTH OF 255.46 FEET TO A POINT 2070.
ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 PM 2221 AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY; x
YUCAIPA BLVD
2075. 8�
X
0VICINITY MAP x pen
NO SCALE
•• .ir' .
2072
x2072.6
�r!
2068.5 6' 2084.
THENCE N 48-58 49 E 327.35 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHEASTLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID X PARCEL 1, 2068. 5 12' WIDE CITY ACCESS WALL GX
A n THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARCEL 1 N 41903'57" W 107.66 FEET TO THE POINT OF EASEMENT AREA (TYP.) - o PARCEL #2 - 39,150 S.F.
BEGINNING. � 064. 3 y " SE P PE MIT 3��J
(57
17.69'
i
E ST. DRIVEWAY , USE PERMIT -
A 0 BE REMOVED -
E
N 81023' 4�
_ NOTE:
THE BOUNDARY, SURVEY, TOPOGRAPHY & LEGAL DESCRIPTION INFORMATION _ FD - BRASS ST INDICATED HEREIN IS PROVIDED BY VARIOUS SURVEYS & SERVICES PERFORMED BY J.D.
Y OF CA 3 • '- COLE & ASSOC, INC. LAND SURVEYING, 909-797-2074, DATED 8-19-2020 & 2-12-21.
R R23 ' 44 " 3 00 �h�
E 2�'6�, - - C - BC -
2097/4
x
..
',�•Y`'
0. ° IX F /2" ASS
P1 r ' /' I- A Ti-9 A 1 r
09 .4 PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT OWNER: SG OPAL, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION - PANKAJ PATEL 1462 CRESTVIEW RD., REDLANDS, CA 92374
2 2 • 09 (909) 709-7497 o.
APPLICANT: AXESH (ALEX) PATEL 2
X 1462 CRESTVIEW RD., REDLANDS, CA 92374
(909) 831-5837 m.
[email protected]
PLAN PREPARATION: GREGORY LAMBRIGHT
/ (4801 229-4239
[email protected]
PROJECT ADDRESS: 32788 OAK GLEN ROAD, YUCAIPA, CA 92399 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE IS TO BE DEMOLISHED, AND THE SITE LIFTED UP TO STREET LEVEL - WITH UP TO 12' OF FILL. THE NEW SITE
GRADES WILL GENERALLY FOLLOW THE HEIGHT OF THE ADJACENT ROADWAY.
FIRST PROJECT PHASE - CONSTRUCT A NEW CHEVRON GAS STATION AND FUELING CANOPY W/ 8 DISPENSERS, AND TUNNEL CAR WASH. THIS PROJECT PHASE WILL BE SLOPED GRADUALLY TO THE NORTHEAST.
SECOND PROJECT PHASE - CONSTRUCT A NEW HOTEL WITH THREE FLOORS AND A BASEMENT LEVEL - FOR 75 TO 90 ROOMS - WITH ROOF TOP DINING AND OUTDOOR POOL AMENITIES. THIS PROJECT PHASE WILL BE SLOPED GRADUALLY TO THE NORTH.
APN: 0301-174-07-0-000
ZONING: CS (SERVICE COMMERCIAL) - THIS SITE
NORTH: OPEN SPACE (WILSON CREEK)
WEST: CS (RESIDENTIAL CURRENTLY)
SOUTH: OPEN SPACE (OAK GLEN RD.)
EAST: NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
ROADWAY EASEMENTS: THERE ARE NO KNOWN ROADWAY EASEMENTS ON THIS SITE DRAINAGE: THERE ARE NO EXIST. DRAINAGE CHANNELS OR HILLY TERRAIN HEREON SIGNAGE: ALL SIGNAGE TO BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT
EXISTING PROPERTY SIZE: 102,263 S.F. / 2.35 AC.
PROPOSED ADD. PROPERTY: 39,150 S.F. / .90 AC.
TOTAL PROPOSED SIZE: 141,413 S.F. / 3.25 AC.
MAX HEIGHT ALLOWED: 45' - 38' PROPOSED ROOF DECK FLOOR HEIGHT / 52' PROPOSED MAX HEIGHT @ HOTEL ROOF
MAX LOT COVERAGE: 90% / 81% PROPOSED @114,550 S.F. COVERAGE LANDSCAPE AREA: 26,868 S.F. / 19%
0 0
MAX BUILDING COVERAGE. 65/ / 17.7/ @ 25,000 S.F. COVERAGE OPEN SPACE PROPOSED: 11.5% / 17,400 S.F.
CONVENIENCE STORE:
6,060 S.F. RETAIL FIRST FLOOR /
(24 / 7 / 365 OPERATION)
3,000 S.F. OFFICE SECOND FLOOR - MEZZANINE
(ABC LICENSE ANTICIPATED)
FUEL CANOPY:
4,560 S.F. / 16 FUEL POSITIONS / 16'-6" CLEAR HT. / 21' MAX HT. (24 / 7 / 365 OPERATION)
CAR WASH:
2,350 S.F. - 90' CONVEYOR / TUNNEL WASH
(7am - 9pm / 365 OPERATION)
HOTEL:
10,720 S.F. /PER FLOOR (64-70 ROOMS)
(24 / 7 / 365 OPERATION)
ROOF TOP BAR/GRILLE:
1,500 S.F. DINING AREA
_
(ABC LICENSE ANTICIPATED)
p
PARKING CALCULATIONS:
RATIO REQUIRED PROVIDED
z
C-STORE PARKING REQUIRED:
1:250 24 46
VACUUM SPACES:
N/A 0 6
SITEPLAN HOTEL PARKING REQUIRED: 1:1 68 74
SCALE 1" - 3U'-0" BAR/GRILLE PARKING: 1:50 30 30
- TOTAL SPACES: 116 156
TOTAL ACCESSIBLE SPACES: 6 8
TOTAL LOADING SPACES: 2 2
PARKING STALL SIZES: 9' x 17' + 2' OVERHANG MIN.
LOADING STALL SIZES: 10' x 19' + 1' OVERHANG MIN.
Gregory Lambright
A rt & A rchitecture, L L C
1909 N Oracle Circle
Mesa AZ 85203
480-229-4239 m.
DE �N1S
o�vMoft.NOS F oft.
NS-TRv
Gp
PROJECT DESIGN SET
Project:
OAK GLEN RD.
CHEVRON
AUTO CENTER
& HOTEL
PROJECT
32788 OAK GLEN
ROAD
YU CAI PA CA 92154
CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT
SITE PLAN
11-21-2022
Cup=Sp=1
YUCAIPA BLVD
CITY GENERAL GRADING NOTES:
1. ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM TO APPENDIX J OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, LATEST EDITION AND THE CITY OF YUCAIPA GRADING CODE.
2. ALL PROVISIONS OF THE PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT BY: JOHN BYERLY, INC., REPORT NO. 5195, DATED JUNE 20, 2018, SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.
3. THIS PLAN IS FOR GRADING PURPOSES ONLY. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS
OR SIZES, PARKING LOT LAYOUT, BUILDING LOCATIONS, OFFSITE DRAINAGE FACILITIES OR OTHER ITEMS NOT RELATED DIRECTLY TO THE BASIC GRADING OPERATION.
4. CERTIFICATION (FORM PROVIDED BY CITY) FROM THE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER AND SOILS/GEOLOGICAL ENGINEER STATING THAT
THE ROUGH GRADING HAS BEEN COMPLETED PER THE APPROVED PLAN AND A COMPACTION REPORT FROM THE SOILS ENGINEER ON ANY FILL AREAS THAT ARE REQUIRED SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMITS BEING ISSUED.
5. CERTIFICATION (FORM PROVIDED BY CITY) FROM THE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER STATING THAT THE FINE GRADING HAS BEEN COMPLETED PER THE APPROVED PLAN IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY PERMITS BEING ISSUED.
6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION, DUST, MUD, SILT, DEBRIS, AND TEMPORARY DRAINAGE CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.
7. AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN IS REQUIRED TO ISSUING A GRADING PERMIT BETWEEN OCTOBER 1ST AND MAY 1ST. (THE GRADING PLANS ARE TO NOTE THIS REQUIREMENT).
8. ANY ON -SITE RETAINING WALLS WILL REQUIRE APPROVAL AS PART OF THESE PLANS. ANY NECESSARY RETAINING WALLS ON THE
PERIMETER OF THIS SITE MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE IN PLACE AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE START OF GRADING. APPROVED SEQUENCED GRADING WITH 1 1 /2:1 MAXIMUM SLOPE TO WITHIN 2 FEET OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE MAY BE ACCEPTABLE TO ALLOW FOR START OF GRADING PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF ANY NECESSARY PERIMETER RETAINING WALLS.
9. ANY IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PLAN APPROVAL AND INSPECTION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER.
10. ANY WALLS, FENCES, STRUCTURES AND/OR APPURTENANCES ADJACENT TO THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. IF
GRADING OPERATIONS DAMAGE OR ADVERSELY AFFECT SAID ITEMS IN ANY WAY, THE CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKING OUT AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNER(S).
11. THE CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THAT RETAINING WALLS DO NOT INTERFERE WITH PROVISION OF UTILITIES.
12. IT IS THE SOIL ENGINEER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE COMPACTION HAS BEEN ATTAINED ON THE ENTIRE GRADING SITE, INCLUDING FILL AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PADS AND ON ALL FILL SLOPES.
13. CITY APPROVAL OF PLANS DOES NOT RELIEVE THE DEVELOPER FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRECTION OR ERROR OR OMISSION DISCOVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON REQUEST, THE REQUIRED PLAN REVISIONS SHALL BE PROMPTLY SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL.
14. IT SHALL BE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CALL THE CITY AT (909) 797-2489 FOR INSPECTION TWO (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY WORK. WORK PERFORMED WITHOUT CALLING FOR INSPECTION SHALL BE REJECTED AND SHALL BE REMOVED SOLELY AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
15. NO GRADING SHALL COMMENCE WITHOUT OBTAINING A GRADING PERMIT AND NOTIFYING THE GRADING INSPECTOR TO SCHEDULE A PRE -GRADING MEETING TWO (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK.
16. ALL ACTIVE IRRIGATION LINES ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED WITH 10-GAUGE DOUBLE DIPPED AND WRAPPED WELDED STEEL PIPE.
17. PRIOR TO THE START OF GRADING, ALL EXISTING VEGETATION AND DEBRIS (INCLUDING EXISTING STRUCTURES, FOOTINGS,
FOUNDATIONS, RUBBLE, TREES AND ROOT SYSTEMS) SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER.
18. AFTER REMOVAL OF DEBRIS, ANY EXISTING FILL OR DISTURBED NATURAL SOILS SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER.
19. THE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL THEN BE INSPECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER, AND ANY ADDITIONAL OVER -EXCAVATION SHALL THEN BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND AS CONTAINED IN THE SOILS REPORT.
20. THE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL THEN BE SCARIFIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES, BROUGHT TO PROPER MOISTURE CONTENT AND COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 90% OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY, AS DETERMINED BY CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, APPENDIX J.
21. IF ANY UNFORESEEN SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THEY SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING FURTHER.
22. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY (CERTIFICATION FORM PROVIDED BY CITY) AND REPORT THAT
PROPER COMPACTION HAS BEEN OBTAINED BY SUBCONTRACTORS AND AGENCIES CONCERNING UTILITY LINE BACKFILL (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SEWERS, WATER LINES, ELECTRICAL, GAS, AND LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION LINES).
23. AN AS -GRADED GRADING PLAN AND THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FORMS FOR SAID GRADING PLAN WITH THE PROPER STAMPS
AND SIGNATURES ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO RELEASE OF GRADING BOND AND PRIOR TO FINAL GRADING INSPECTION.
24. ANY DRIVE APPROACHES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO CITY OF YUCAIPA STANDARDS. NOTE THAT 4' OF SIDEWALK AT 2% SLOPE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BEHIND DRIVE APPROACHES PER TITLE 24 REQUIREMENTS IF THERE IS NO LANDSCAPED PARKWAY.
25. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL IN A LOCATION REQUEST TO UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (USA), PHONE NUMBER 1-800-227-2600, TWO (2) WORKING DAYS BEFORE DIGGING. NO INSPECTION WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE,
AND NO CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ISSUED INVOLVING EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES WILL BE VALID UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS BEEN PROVIDED AN INQUIRY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER BY USA.
26. SEPARATE PLANS FOR TEMPORARY DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE USED DURING THE RAINY SEASON MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1. THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THE PLANS MUST BE INSTALLED BY NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1 AND MAINTAINED IN OPERABLE CONDITION UNTIL APRIL 15 AND/OR BEFORE ANY ANTICIPATED RAIN THROUGHOUT THE YEAR.
27. IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL AT
28. WE/ I REPRESENTING _____________________ INDICATE THAT RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN REPORTS PERTAINING TO SOILS ENGINEERING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH TO OUR SATISFACTION. THIS CONFIRMATION IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS AN AUTHENTICATION OF ANY DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.
BY: ----------------- RCE# ------------------
BY: ----------------- RCE# ------------------
DATE:
-----------------
29. ESTIMATED START DATE: COMPLETION DATE:
30. TOPOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED BY IN
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
32788 OAK GLEN ROAD - A.P.N. 0301-174-07
SITE MAP
SCALE: 1 "=100'
GENERAL NOTES:
\GNV'
GNV
i _
0318-061-28
Cps OR��_;-
'-
RE ,
I
1. THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL.
2. SANITARY FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON THE SITE.
3. THE LOCATION AND PROTECTION OF ALL UTILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE.
4. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT IN -PLACE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. ANY UTILITY REMOVALS OR RELOCATION'S SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY PURVEYOR. PHASED UTILITY
RELOCATION'S MAY BE NECESSARY AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY TO CLOSELY COORDINATE HIS ACTIVITIES WITH THOSE OF ALL UTILITY COMPANIES.
5. THE PERMITTEE SHALL GIVE REASONABLE NOTICE TO THE OWNER OF ADJOINING
LANDS AND BUILDINGS PRIOR TO BEGINNING EXCAVATION WHICH MAY AFFECT THE LATERAL AND SUBJACENT SUPPORT OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTY. THE NOTICE
SHALL STATE THE INTENDED DEPTH OF EXCAVATION AND WHEN THE EXCAVATION WILL COMMENCE. THE ADJOINING OWNER SHALL BE ALLOWED AT LEAST 30 DAYS
AND REASONABLE ACCESS ON THE PERMITTED PROPERTY TO PROTECT HIS STRUCTURE, IF HE SO DESIRES, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW.
F
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
SEE TITLE REPORT/DEED FOR FULL LEGAL
DESCRIPTION.
BASIS OF BEARING:
THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON
THE CENTERLINE OF 13TH STREET, PER
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PREPARED BY TMR
ASSOCIATES.
BEARING BEING N 00°03' 14" W PER RS
114/53-60
BENCHMARK:
CITY OF YUCAIPA BENCHMARK NUMBER 460:
AT KENTUCKY AND 13TH STS, 544 FT. EAST OF
13TH, 20 FT. SOUTH OF KENTUCKY, AT # 32783
KENTUCKY, 22 FT. WEST OF WEST EDGE
DRIVEWAY.
ELEVATION=2,106.11
OWNER /APPLICANT:
SG OPAL, INC.
1462 CRESTVIEW ROAD
REDLANDS, CA 92374
CONTACT: ALEX PATEL
ENGINEER /MAP PREPARER:
SITETECH, INC.
8061 CHURCH STREET, P.O. BOX 592
HIGHLAND, CA 92346
CONTACT: BERNIE MAYER
PH: (909) 864-3180
E-MAIL: [email protected]
DRAINAGE STUDY NOTE:
A PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY
WAS PREPARED BY SITETECH INC.
DATED FEBRUARY 2021.
TOPOGRAPHY NOTE:
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WAS
PERFORMED BY TMR ASSOCIATES,
AUGUST 2020.
24-HOUR CONTACT:
ALEX PATEL
PH:
E-MAIL:
UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THIS PROJECT:
TELEPHONE:
VERIZON
15 REDLANDS PLAZA
REDLANDS, CA 92373
PH: (909) 793-7511
CABLE TELEVISION:
TIME WARNER
1971 W. REDLANDS BLVD.
REDLANDS, CA 92374
PH: (888) 892-2253
ELECTRIC:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
287 TENNESSEE STREET
REDLANDS, CA 92373
PH: (909) 335-7191
GAS:
THE GAS CO.
1981 LUGONIA AVENUE
REDLANDS, CA 92373
PH: (909) 793-2725
i2r1i213
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
0 CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. 110-1.
O CONSTRUCT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER CLASS II BASE. THICKNESS PER SOIL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS.
O CONSTRUCT 8" CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. 120-1.
O CONSTRUCT 6" CURB / CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. 120-1.
O CONSTRUCT PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAD. THICKNESS PER SOIL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS.
O CONSTRUCT 3' WIDE LONGITUDINAL GUTTER, PER A.P.W.A. STANDARD 122-2.
O CONSTRUCT 36" CURB OPENING.
O INSTALL SUMP PUMP TO MEET REQUIRED WQMP FLOW/VOLUME, CONVEY STORM WATER TO INFILTRATION BASIN.
O INSTALL 36" DROP INLET CATCH BASIN BY BROOKS PRODUCTS, MODEL #3636, OR APPROVED EQUAL.
10 INSTALL EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 36"X36" DRAIN INLET WITH DEBRIS RACK FOR BASIN OVERFLOW OUTLET.
11 CONSTRUCT ROCK RIP -RAP BASIN INLET AND SEDIMENT FOREBAY, PER DETAIL ON SHEET 4.
12 CONSTRUCT 6,181 C.F. INFILTRATION BASIN (10,290 C.F. REQUIRED), 13 CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALL PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STANDARDS. 14 CONSTRUCT 1' WIDE LONGITUDINAL GUTTER, PER A.P.W.A. STANDARD 122-2. 15 CONSTRUCT BUILDING STEM WALL PER ARCHITECTURAL/STRUCTURAL PLANS. 16 INSTALL ADA ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS PER ADA REQUIREMENTS. 17 INSTALL STRIPING PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
18 CONSTRUCT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
19 CONSTRUCT TRENCH DRAIN
20 CONSTRUCT 3,328 C.F. INFILTRATION BASIN (10,290 C.F. REQUIRED),
YUCAIPA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
12270 2ND STREET
YUCAIPA, CA 92399
PH: (909) 797-5117
WATER:
WESTERN HEIGHTS WATER COMPANY
32352 AVENUE D
YUCAIPA, CA 92399
PH: (909) 790-1901
LEGEND:
INDICATES EXISTING CONTOUR
- INDICATES STREET CENTERLINE
-
- INDICATES BOUNDARY LINE
- INDICATES BOUNDARY LINE
- ►- -
- INDICATES FLOW LINE
-------- 0r
- INDICATES EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE
- INDICATES CONCRETE PAVEMENT
- INDICATES INFILTRATION BASIN BOTTOM
- INDICATES LANDSCAPING
A.P.N.
- INDICATES ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
FF
- INDICATES FINISH FLOOR
TYP.
- INDICATES TYPICAL
EG
- INDICATES EXISTING GRADE
TC
- INDICATES TOP OF CURB
FS
- INDICATES FINISH SURFACE
FL
- INDICATES FLOWLINE
HP
- INDICATES HIGH POINT
EX. / (E)
- INDICATES EXISTING
PR. / (P)
- INDICATES PROPOSED
868
�GNV
\ -c -
�DIRT-_-
_ _=7
ROCKS
Red WILSON CREEK -
ROCKS'
14 j
SUMP PUMP OUTLET
---------- === -��/ - _T 13 SPLASH PAD
P/L6.
ni T T� 7540 886 02 G T�IRT
��
I / 6 24.0' b 1 c y 1 � v6 kr vnj � -
/ 18 ♦ o �� ` �5� 4 F�9�s3 0- UMPS o 9j.85
91 8FS o
oo
92.99 CD
TYP. /'92.63 / L
in �. 4 FS.90 17.0 6 � FS 91. 2 ��
I o �� . ��
06 o /
�o "' PHASE 2 LF�F=85.90 `� -1.5� 27.0' 1.�� Fs 6g /�/ 5 /' o� 2 �' TAT- 4 I IOTEL 5� 8�8 0'� 90.19 ��� 2 °og // 4 / \ S 48'55'57" W 28.70' A , � n n A� 17.0' FF=85.90 � F� 8 � �o� � � �� � ��4 / 9263 o- � , � � � 1 � CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
Q oo r `/ 4 2 17 Typ �o �s9 / / U O CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. 110-1.
1.5% 5 / n N 37'11'36" E 17.18'
G N V G N V 84.28 .p, \ O2 CONSTRUCT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER CLASS II BASE. THICKNESS ---2.0� ; �. 1
� Fs 17 nP• �� �• � / , � � PER SOIL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS. / '� 90.99 `L / , oho � v
82.40TC 8 17.0 PHASE 2 �� FS 97•83 y O3 CONSTRUCT 8" CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. 120-1.
82.40FL 84.19TC I �o �� O5 FS
4 o P MEANDERING
83.69FS � ��
13 17 TYP 17.0 69 0, 4 ` �9 )W @ 2% �,P - '�/ ` 4O CONSTRUCT 6 CURB / CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. 120-1.
17.0' 4.0% 1.9% 1.5% s- O5 CONSTRUCT PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAD. THICKNESS PER SOIL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS.
I i 1.5%1.57.16 EJ�Q 6 CONSTRUCT 3 WIDE LONGITUDINAL GUTTER, PER A.P.W.A. STANDARD 122-2.
DECK -:- 16 I 5% oti PHASE 1&2 I CON
I o o �o LIMITS 0 / O7 CONSTRUCT 36 CURB OPENING.
4.0� 19.0
LLiLL•
/ 16 c, 17 TYP. (P UNDERGROUND `S
� � G )SOLINE TANKS I - - / / � T�F �/ O8 INSTALL SUMP PUMP TO MEET REQUIRED WQMP FLOW/VOLUME, CONVEY ------ o - 8596 -- �ti°1�- - - �%� STORM WATER TO INFILTRATION BASIN.
FLmoo. 0 i � I o 8 c OF` / I 9O INSTALL 36„ DROP INLET CATCH BASIN BY BROOKS PRODUCTS, MODEL #3636, I 487. 2 I / I OR APPROVED EQUAL.
loo
oo / 4 10 INSTALL EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 36"X36" DRAIN INLET WITH DEBRIS RACK FOR I� o °� . ��o _ / BASIN OVERFLOW OUTLET.
83.38TC 83.29 6 6 6Al
- -
I 82.88FL 1.0% FL 4 1 2% / / 'o_ ` / 11 CONSTRUCT ROCK RIP -RAP BASIN INLET AND SEDIMENT FOREBAY, PER DETAIL �i R=806.00' / ON SHEET 4.
- - - - �_- - L1226. �
I
o _ 90 D 07'16" /� � ` I (/ 000NSTRUCT 6,181 C.F. INFILTRATION BASIN (10,290 C.F. REQUIRED), } ^ o �! 86.15 13 CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALL PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STANDARDS. o
1 1 �o I i l i O
lz/13 .5� o I _ I 14 CONSTRUCT 1 WIDE LONGITUDINAL GUTTER, PER A.P.W.A. STANDARD 122-2.
83.79Tc 24.0' 84.15TC 17 TYP. R/W 2 - - _ Q I , J 15 CONSTRUCT BUILDING STEM WALL PER ARCHITECTURAL/STRUCTURAL PLANS.
GNV 83.29FS. . 83.65FS / A.P.N. 0318-071-07 __ 0
ice- � � �
INSTALL ADA ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS PER ADA REQUIREMENTS.
LL
FL
J - ✓/� / 17 INSTALL STRIPING PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
/ 75.80-;1 / (P MEANDERING _i� 18 CONSTRUCT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. �0 1 81.87 S)W�2%,TYP. /, � � //�__-_����-� ��/�� i // � �� �� �� // O ��.69' FL 3 ��� // / / �� i \ 1 (r �� / / / / / / / / 19 CONSTRUCT TRENCH DRAIN � 81.03
3 �o
CONSTRUCT 28 C.F. INFILTRATION BASIN ( 90 C.F. REQUIRED), 33 102
8.44 i
FLYZ
DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: CITY OF YUCAIP
r
DKJ.B.M. J.M.M. B.K.M.LIMINA Y A DI AM DDCDADCf1 1 IAInCD TUC' CI IDCD\ACl/lAI /lC. I-1 I"1 r 1 1 1 I I A I A I-1 \ / /11"1 A r SCALE: 1 "=30'
NOTE:
ADD 2000 TO ALL 30 0 30 60
PROPOSED GRADES.
869
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
000NSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. 110-1. i /�j/� �/ 2� CONSTRUCT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER CLASS II BASE. THICKNESS Ry-PER SOIL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS.
j%�—
�" //� /j % / / / O3 CONSTRUCT 8" CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. 120-1. �l / j / / / / / / 4O CONSTRUCT 6" CURB / CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STD. 120-1.
CONSTRUCT PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAD. THICKNESS PER SOIL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS.
\ \G N V CONSTRUCT 3' 'WIDE LONGITUDINAL GUTTER, PER A.P.W.A. STANDARD 122-2. / //� j// / 000NSTRUCT 36 CURB OPENING.
/�// / 8 INSTALL SUMP PUMP TO MEET REQUIRED WQMP FLOW/VOLUME, CONVEY STORM WATER TO INFILTRATION BASIN.
INSTALL 36" DROP INLET CATCH BASIN BY BROOKS PRODUCTS, MODEL #3636, OR APPROVED EQUAL.
//C\ / / 10 INSTALL EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 36"X36" DRAIN INLET WITH DEBRIS RACK FOR / / //� / /\� / / BASIN OVERFLOW OUTLET.
/
/ // / / \ CONSTRUCT ROCK RIP -RAP BASIN INLET AND SEDIMENT FOREBAY, PER DETAIL / ///� / / / \ / � //// / 11 ON SHEET 4.
// /, I / 000NSTRUCT 6,181 C.F. INFILTRATION BASIN (10,290 C.F. REQUIRED), / G N V / / j % �i / C`l / ��% j / / / / ' Y — — 13 CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALL PER CITY OF YUCAIPA STANDARDS.
CONSTRUCT 1' WIDE LONGITUDINAL GUTTER, PER A.P.W.A. STANDARD 122-2. 15 CONSTRUCT BUILDING STEM WALL PER ARCHITECTURAL/STRUCTURAL PLANS.
INSTALL ADA ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS PER ADA REQUIREMENTS. 0INSTALL STRIPING PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
// / / // / / 18 CONSTRUCT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
I G N V / / %� // /� / / i%�/ / % / 19 CONSTRUCT TRENCH DRAIN CONSTRUCT 3,328 C.F. INFILTRATION BASIN (10,290 C.F. REQUIRED), /W
P/L % s / / / r.9
GNU
��� / /
\ 3
(P) S/W @GNV
2%, TYP. /
R=1584.99'
13 i j ��' 11�� 10� /� L=43.01'
89.24 , - `;' ' TIE OUTLET PIPE
V-GUTTER AT /
��� FS -� �� �' INTO EX. SEWER /
TOP OF WALL �/ 7 /
14�j
RU C i� S / / j �j � 1i . . 89.57 4 89 37 R=100.00'
/� 1 co j% / 'S FS 14 i /, L=30.11'
i060.00
L=359.92' �O� � � � � � D=1 T15'14"
N 48'55'57" E 48.53'
op
D=19*27'17" �5� ,� / A 20
co 2
i
co S PHASE 1, 2 F oo�
13 �o �� 4
'a 8 r\i'
P/L °o F� �� o
14 / / J� v a X,
TYP 17 s r
R=95.00'
L=52.67'
90 45 TC
FL
90.77 Ile s 2.00 (P) MEANDERING
FS to s S/W @ 2%, TYP. / \
8s 0* CAR 6o'
x 9730
WASHY/��
>>
Fs � FF=92.00
4 A.P.N. 0318-061-28
/ N 61'44'36" E 18.04' // // /
/
o
DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: CITY OF YUCAIPA
OFESS/
U'���� �(�__,_- PRELIMINARY GRADII`
�O P PFtD K.
J o \\\ \\� / ���������� PLAN PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF:
\� w N0.36866 m PRELIMINARY GRADI`
SCALE: 1 "=30' \ �� �� — / / * Exp. 6-30-24 * A.P.N. 0301-174-07 s; ��
civl� �`' 11 /18/22 32788 OAK GLEN ROA
30 0 30 60 \\ \\ �� / / / / / OF CA`\Fo BERN RD K. 4AYER R.C.E. 36866 DATE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY:
NOTE:
ADD 2000 TO ALL
PROPOSED GRADES.
870
EXHIBIT "A"
SHEET 1 OF 1
REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEING A PORTION OF OAK GLEN ROAD (FORMERLY COLORADO STREET) AND A PORTION OF LOT 2 AND 3 IN COOKS SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF DUNLAP RANCH PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 19 OF MAPS, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, SAID LAND IS ALSO A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY DEPICTED ON RECORD OF SURVEY 00-072 FILED IN BOOK 114 PAGES 53-60 RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 2221 RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 19 PAGE 96 RECORDS OF SAID
COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WILSON CREEK AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 00-072, SAID
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WILSON CREEK BEING A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1060.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 15°14'21" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19°27'17" A DISTANCE OF 359.92 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WILSON CREEK RIGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 42°37'28" EAST 47.60
FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY BEING PARALLEL TO AND 44 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF OAK GLEN ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 00-072; SAID CURVE HAS A RADIUS OF 1584.99 FEET AND RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 42` 37' 28"WEST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01°33'17" A DISTANCE OF 43.01 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG A LINE RUNNING PARALLEL TO AND 44 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF SAID CENTERLINE OF OAK GLEN ROAD SOUTH 48°55'57" WEST 31.59 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 60`25'31" WEST 20.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 48°55'57" WEST 48.53 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28°51'01" WEST 11.65 FEET TO SAID PARALLEL LINE BEING 44 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF THE SAID
CENTERLINE OF OAK GLEN ROAD, THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 48°55'57" WEST 175.64 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 61 `44'36" WEST 18.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 48`55'57" WEST 86.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 37°11'36" WEST 17.18 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY BEING PARALLEL TO AND 44 FEET NORTHWESTERLY
OF SAID CENTERLINE OF OAK GLEN ROAD, SAID CURVE HAS A RADIUS OF 806.00 FEET AND A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 39°02'24"
WEST, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°07'16" A DISTANCE OF 226.78 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 OF SAID PARCEL MAP 2221; THENCE
LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE AND RUNNING ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL 1 THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES;
NORTH 48` 58' 02" EAST 327.31 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 41 ° 04' 20" WEST 107.61 FEET TO THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 39,150 SQ. FT. OF LAND, MORE OR LESS
THIS DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION:
5ED LAND SCR
11 18 22 G�� �PRD K. LF�
BERNHA K. ER L.S. 7319 DATE
BY TECH, C.
NO. 7319
Exp. 6-30-23
��qTF OF CAOFD��\P
871
Gregory Lambright
Art & Architecture, L L C
1909 N Oracle Circle
Mesa AZ 85203
480-229-4239 m.
100
95 90
85 80
75 70
65 CAP UNIT
ADHERE TO TOP UNIT
IMPERVIOUS FILL
W/VERSA-LOK
12" DEEP
CONCRETE ADHESIVE
GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCEMENT
SEE PROFILE DRAWINGS
FOR LENGTH, TYPE, AND SPACING
VERSA-LOK COBBLE
MODULAR CONCRETE UNITS
DRAINAGE AGGREGATE
12" THICK MIN.
REINFORCED BACKFILL
\'\ �COMPACTED 95% OF MAXIMUM
STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY
�\
\
4" DIA. (MIN.) DRAIN PIPE
OUTLET ® END OF WALL
OR @ 40' CENTERS MAX.
SLOPE TO DRAIN (1/8"/FT.)
ERVIOUS FILL
GRANULAR LEVELING PAD
6" THICK MIN.
TYPICAL SECTION —REINFORCED RETAINING WALL
COBBLE UNIT
SCALE: NONE
VERSA -WALL RETAINING WALL SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
1.1ii.\I M 111 IdLtii ri7.1-W.7.1.1.1-I.7LI1 Idnl
100
95 90
85 80
75 70
65 RETAINING WALL DESIGN ELEVATION - NORTHWEST
SCALE: 1" = 30'
RETAINING WALL DESIGN ELEVATION
- WEST
SCALE: 1 = 30
PROJECT DESIGN SET
Project:
OAK GLEN RD.
CHEVRON
AUTO CENTER
& HOTEL
PROJECT
32788 OAK GLEN
ROAD
YUCAIPA CA 92154
SCHEMATIC
RETAINING
WALL PLANS
11-21-2022
1 872 1 1
RW=1