Public Comment Item 11 — Yucaipa City Council, January 23, 2023

Public Comment Item No. 11
P: (626) 381-9248 0
F: (626) 389-5414 Mitchell M. Tsai
E: [email protected] Attorney At Law

VIA E-MAIL
January 23, 2023
City of Yucaipa
34272 Yucaipa Blvd
Yucaipa, CA 92399
Em: publiccomment@yucaTg
Benjamin Matlock
City of Yucaipa
34272 Yucaipa Blvd
Yucaipa, CA 92399
Em: bmadocknyucaipa.org
139 South Hudson Avenue
Suite 200
Pasadena, California 91101
RE: Agenda Item No. 11: Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project Case No. 21-026/CUP/DA)
Honorable Councilmembers,
On behalf of the Southwest Mountain States Regional Council of Carpenters ("Southwest Mountain States Carpenters" or "SWMSRCC"), my Office is submitting these comments to the City of Yucaipa ("City") for the January 23, 2023 City Council meeting to reiterate its concerns regarding the Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project (Case No. 21-026/CUP/DA) (Project"), Agenda Item No. 11.

As mentioned in our January 9 letter (Exhibit A), the City should require the Project to be built using a local workers who have graduated from a Joint Labor -Management Apprenticeship Program approved by the State of California, have at least as many hours of on-the-job experience in the applicable craft which would be required to graduate from such a state -approved apprenticeship training program, or who are registered apprentices in a state -approved apprenticeship training program to benefit the local area economically and to mitigate greenhouse gas, improve air quality, and reduce transportation impacts.

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 23, 2023

Page 2 of 3 ends

Additionally, as we previously mentioned, SWMSRCC requests that the City require that all construction workers undergo COVID-19 Training and Certification before being allowed to conduct construction activities at the Project Site and that the City require the Project to be built using a workforce trained in ICRA protocols.

Finally, SWMSRCC maintains that the City must prepare an EIR for the Project given that there is a fair argument that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment in light of the insufficiencies with the Project's Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND"), triggering the "low threshold" standard for preparation of an EIR. At the very least, however, SWMSRCC maintains that the City must revise and recirculate the MND to address the following issues:

A. The MND Omits Analysis Concerning Operational Air Quality Impacts to Senesitive Receptors
As previously noted by SWMSRCC, although the MND does assess the Project's operational air quality impacts generally, it limits the impacts to sensitive receptors to paving activities from the construction. MND at 13. Therefore, the MND fails to account for impacts to sensitive receptors stemming from the Project's operational use. This is particularly disconcerting given the severity of potential air quality impacts on nearby residents given the Project's gas station where small routine gas spills vaporize into the air.' The MND must be revised to include this analysis.

B. The MND Fails to Supbort its Biological Resource Impact Findings with Substantail Evidence
The MND also fails to support its less than significant biological resource impact finding with substantial evidence. Although, the MND blanketly concludes that the Project does not "feature any candidate, sensitive, or special status species, riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community, wetlands; and wildlife corridors", it bases such conclusion solely on a "visual site investigation" which found that the Project site is disturbed and a photograph contained in the Staff Report. MND at 14; Staff Report at 245. Such analysis, or lack thereof, is entirely lacking.

First, the MND fails to attach the actual findings and data of the visual investigation for public review and input. Such omission runs contrary to the CEQA requirement ' Small Spills at Gas Stations Could Cause Significant Public Health Risks Over Time (Oct. 2014), available at https://hub.jhu.edu/2014/10/07/gas-station-spills/("Small Spills Article").

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 23, 2023

Page 3 of 4 ends

that an environmental document must provide or attach the technical details and data it relies upon, rather than mere conclusory findings, to support its determinations.

CEQA Guidelines §§ 15147; 15148; 15150; San Franciscans for Reasonable Growtb P. City &; County of San Francisco (1987) 193 Ca1.App.3d 1544. 1549. The MND must be revised to include the visual investigation data it relies upon.

Further, no actual survey was conducted to assess the existence of wildlife and plant species on the Project site nor the potential habitat value of the Project site. The MND must conduct and include such analysis in order for its finding to be supported by substantial evidence.

C. The MND Fails to Demonstrate Less Than Significant Energy Impacts The MND's energy analysis is wholly insufficient as it fails to provide any quantitative analysis or table identifying how much energy the Project is expected to use during either its construction or operational phase, as required. MND at 16-17; CEQA Guidelines § 15126.2(b) [energy analysis "should include the project's energy use for all project phases and components, including transportation -related energy, during construction and operation"]. Rather, the MND improperly relies almost entirely on regulatory compliance to conclude that the Project will not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary energy. Calfornians forAlternatives to Toxics P. Department of Food & Agric. (2005) 136 Cal. App. 4th 1 [reliance upon regulatory compliance to prevent significant adverse impacts must be based on a project -specific analysis of potential impacts and the effect of regulatory compliance]. Likewise, the Staff Report's justification that the Project analysis provides that the Project energy use would be nominal compared to the overall statewide petroleum use cannot rectify the MND's lack of Project specific analysis and quantification. Staff Report at 244. The MND must be revised to provide Project -specific quantitative analysis of the Project's expected energy use during all of its phases before speculating that its impacts will be less than significant.

D. The MND Fails to Analyze and Mitigate Routine Gas Spills in its Geology/Soils and Hydrology/Water Quality Sections
As noted in our last comment letter, studies have shown that small spills that routinely occur at gas stations when consumers refill their tanks have the potential to cause significant groundwater and soil impacts. Given the potential for these harmful impacts, it is imperative to prevent rainwater from flowing over the concrete pads

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 23, 2023

Page 4 of 4 ends

underneath the pumps. Otherwise, storm runoff gets contaminated with benzene and other harmful chemicals and can infiltrate into adjacent soil patches or form storm water that may end up in natural bodies of water. Id. Accordingly, SWMSRCC again that the MND must assess these impacts and implement mitigation measures beyond "existing regulations that will uniformly applicable to the fuel station use and governed by their respective agencies." Staff Report at 245.

E. The MND Fails to Assess the Project's Consistency with All Pertinent Plans
Although SWMSRCC appreciates the Staff Report's inclusion of General Plan policies (Staff Report at 253), neither the Staff Report nor MND analyze consistency with the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Without conducting this analysis, the MND's less than significant finding remains unsupported.

V. CONCLUSION
In sum, SMSWRCC again requests that the City require a local workforce, that the City impose training requirements for the Project's construction activities to prevent community spread of Covid-19 and other infectious diseases, and that the City prepare an EIR for the Project or revise and recirculate the MND at the very least to address the aforementioned concerns. If the City has any questions, feel free to contact my office.

Sincerely,
Talia Nimmer
Attorneys for Southwest Mountain
States Regional Council of Carpenters
Attached: Talia Nimmer's January 9, 2023 Letter to the City (Exhibit A).

EXHIBIT A

P: (626) 381-9248 139 South Hudson Avenue
F: (626) 389-5414 Mitchell M. Tsai Suite 200
E: [email protected] Attorney At Law Pasadena, California 91101

VIA E-MAIL
January 9, 2023
City of Yucaipa
34272 Yucaipa Blvd
Yucaipa, CA 92399
Em: publiccomment@yucaTg
Benjamin Matlock
City of Yucaipa
34272 Yucaipa Blvd
Yucaipa, CA 92399
Em: bmadocknyucaipa.org
RE: Agenda Item No. 11: Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project Case No. 21-026/CUP/DA)
Honorable Councilmembers,
On behalf of the Southwest Mountain States Regional Council of Carpenters ("Southwest Mountain States Carpenters" or "SWMSRCC"), my Office is submitting these comments to the City of Yucaipa ("City") for the January 9, 2023 City Council meeting regarding the Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project (Case No. 21-026/CUP/DA) (Project"), Agenda Item No. 11.

The Project proposes to develop a commercial center that includes a fuel station with 16 fuel dispensers and an express carwash, a convenience store, a quick service restaurant, office space, , and a 66-room hotel with a rooftop bar and restaurant.

The Southwest Mountain States Carpenters is a labor union representing 63,000 union carpenters in 10 states, including California, and has a strong interest in well -ordered land use planning and in addressing the environmental impacts of development projects.

Individual members of SWMSRCC live, work, and recreate in the City and surrounding communities and would be directly affected by the Project's environmental impacts.

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 9, 2023

Page 2 of 3 ends

The Southwest Mountain States Carpenters expressly reserves the right to supplement these comments at or prior to hearings on the Project, and at any later hearing and proceeding related to this Project. Gov. Code, § 65009, subd. (b); Pub. Res. Code, 21177, subd. (a); see Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control V. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1199-1203; see also Galante Vineyards V. Monterey Wlater Dist. (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1121.

The Southwest Mountain States Carpenters incorporates by reference all comments raising issues regarding the environmental assessment for the Project prior to approval of the Project. See Citizens for Clean Energy v City of Woodland (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 173, 191 (finding that any party who has objected to the proj ect's environmental documentation may assert any issue timely raised by other parties).

Moreover, the Southwest Mountain States Carpenters requests that the City provide notice for any and all notices referring or related to the Project issued under the California Environmental Quality Act, Pub. Res. Code, § 21000 et seg .("CEQA") and the California Planning and Zoning Law, Gov. Code, §§ 65000-65010 ("Planning and Zoning Law"). California Public Resources Code sections 21092.2, and 21167(f) and California Government Code section 65092 require agencies to mail such notices to any person who has filed a written request for them with the clerk of the agency's governing body.

I. THE CITY SHOULD REQUIRE THE USE OF A LOCAL

WORKFORCE TO BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY'S ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT
The City should require the Project to be built using a local workers who have graduated from a Joint Labor -Management Apprenticeship Program approved by the State of California, have at least as many hours of on-the-job experience in the applicable craft which would be required to graduate from such a state -approved apprenticeship training program, or who are registered apprentices in a state -approved apprenticeship training program.

Community benefits such as local hire can also be helpful to reduce environmental impacts and improve the positive economic impact of the Project. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 9, 2023

Page 3 of 4 ends

emissions, and provide localized economic benefits. As environmental consultants Matt Hagemann and Paul E. Rosenfeld note:
[A]ny local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction -related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site.

March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling.

Workforce requirements promote the development of skilled trades that yield sustainable economic development. As the California Workforce Development Board and the University of California, Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education concluded:
[L]abor should be considered an investment rather than a cost —and investments in growing, diversifying, and upskilling California's workforce can positively affect returns on climate mitigation efforts. In other words, well -trained workers are key to delivering emissions reductions and moving California closer to its climate targets.'
Furthermore, workforce policies have significant environmental benefits given that they improve an area's jobs -housing balance, decreasing the amount and length of job commutes and the associated greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions. In fact, on May 7, 2021, the South Coast Air Quality Management District found that that the "[u]se of a local state -certified apprenticeship program" can result in air pollutant reductions.2 Locating jobs closer to residential areas can have significant environmental benefits.

As the California Planning Roundtable noted in 2008:
1 California Workforce Development Board (2020) Putting California on the High Road: A Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030 at p. ii, available at https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/ w�u-content/uploads /2020 /09 /Putting-California-on-the-High-Road.pdf. 2 South Coast Air Quality Management District (May 7, 2021) Certify Final Environmental Assessment and Adopt Proposed Rule 2305 — Warehouse Indirect Source Rule — Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions Program, and Proposed Rule 316 — Fees for Rule 2305, Submit Rule 2305 for Inclusion Into the SIP, and Approve Supporting Budget Actions, available at http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/Agendas/Governing-Board/2021 /2021-May7-027.12dPsfvrsn=10.

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 9, 2023

Page 4 of 5 ends

People who live and work in the same jurisdiction would be more likely to take transit, walk, or bicycle to work than residents of less balanced communities and their vehicle trips would be shorter. Benefits would include potential reductions in both vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours traveled.'
Moreover, local hire mandates and skill -training are critical facets of a strategy to reduce vehicle miles traveled ("VMT"). As planning experts Robert Cervero and Michael Duncan have noted, simply placing jobs near housing stock is insufficient to achieve VMT reductions given that the skill requirements of available local jobs must match those held by local residents.4 Some municipalities have even tied local hire and other workforce policies to local development permits to address transportation issues. Cervero and Duncan note that:

In nearly built -out Berkeley, CA, the approach to balancing jobs and housing is to create local jobs rather than to develop new housing. The city's First Source program encourages businesses to hire local residents, especially for entry- and intermediate -level jobs, and sponsors vocational training to ensure residents are employment -ready. While the program is voluntary, some 300 businesses have used it to date, placing more than 3,000 city residents in local jobs since it was launched in 1986. When needed, these carrots are matched by sticks, since the city is not shy about negotiating corporate participation in First Source as a condition of approval for development permits.

Recently, the State of California verified its commitment towards workforce development through the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022, otherwise known as Assembly Bill No. 2011 ("AB2011"). AB2011 amended the Planning and Zoning Law to allow ministerial, by -right approval for projects being built alongside commercial corridors that meet affordability and labor requirements. s California Planning Roundtable (2008) Deconstructing Jobs -Housing Balance at p. 6, available at https://cproundtable.org/static/media/uploads/publications/cpr-jobs- housing_pdf
a Cervero, Robert and Duncan, Michael (2006) Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs - Housing Balance or Retail -Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (4), 475-490, 482, available at http://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/UTCT- 825.pdf.

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 9, 2023

Page 5 of 6 ends

The City should consider utilizing local workforce policies and requirements to benefit the local area economically and to mitigate greenhouse gas, improve air quality, and reduce transportation impacts.

II. THE CITY SHOULD IMPOSE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR

THE PROJECT'S CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO PREVENT
COMMUNITY SPREAD OF COVID-19 AND OTHER INFECTIOUS

DISEASES
Construction work has been defined as a Lower to High -risk activity for COVID-19 spread by the Occupations Safety and Health Administration. Recently, several construction sites have been identified as sources of community spread of COVID-

19.5 Southwest Mountain States Carpenters recommend that the City adopt additional requirements to mitigate public health risks from the Project's construction activities.

SWMSRCC requests that the City require safe on -site construction work practices as well as training and certification for any construction workers on the Project Site.

In particular, based upon Southwest Mountain States Carpenters' experience with safe construction site work practices, SWMSRCC recommends that the City require that while construction activities are being conducted at the Project Site:

Construction Site Design:
• The Project Site will be limited to two controlled entry points.
• Entry points will have temperature screening technicians taking temperature readings when the entry point is open. • The Temperature Screening Site Plan shows details
regarding access to the Project Site and Project Site logistics for conducting temperature screening.
• A 48-hour advance notice will be provided to all trades prior to the first day of temperature screening.
'Santa Clara County Public Health Qune 12, 2020) COVID-19 CASES AT

CONSTRUCTION SITES HIGHLIGHT NEED FOR CONTINUED VIGILANCE IN SECTORS THAT HAVE REOPENED, available at https://www.sccgov.org/sites/ covidl 9 /Pages /press-release-06-12-2020-cases-at-construction-sites.aspx.

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 9, 2023

Page 6 of 7 ends

• The perimeter fence directly adjacent to the entry points will be clearly marked indicating the appropriate 6-foot social distancing position for when you approach the screening area. Please reference the Apex temperature screening site map for additional details.
• There will be clear signage posted at the project site directing you through temperature screening.
• Provide hand washing stations throughout the construction site.

Testing Procedures:
• The temperature screening being used are non -contact devices.
• Temperature readings will not be recorded.
• Personnel will be screened upon entering the testing center and should only take 1-2 seconds per individual.
• Hard hats, head coverings, sweat, dirt, sunscreen or any other cosmetics must be removed on the forehead before
temperature screening.
• Anyone who refuses to submit to a temperature screening or does not answer the health screening questions will be
refused access to the Project Site.
• Screening will be performed at both entrances from 5:30 am to 7:30 am.; main gate [ZONE 1] and personnel gate
[ZONE 2]
• After 7:30 am only the main gate entrance [ZONE 1] will continue to be used for temperature testing for anybody gaining entry to the project site such as returning personnel, deliveries, and visitors.
• If the digital thermometer displays a temperature reading above 100.0 degrees Fahrenheit, a second reading will be taken to verify an accurate reading.

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 9, 2023

Page 7 of 8 ends

• If the second reading confirms an elevated temperature, DHS will instruct the individual that he/she will not be allowed to enter the Project Site. DHS will also instruct the individual to promptly notify his/her supervisor and his/her human resources (HR) representative and provide them with a copy of Annex A.

Planning
• Require the development of an Infectious Disease
Preparedness and Response Plan that will include basic
infection prevention measures (requiring the use of personal protection equipment), policies and procedures for prompt identification and isolation of sick individuals, social distancing (prohibiting gatherings of no more than 10
people including all -hands meetings and all -hands lunches) communication and training and workplace controls that
meet standards that may be promulgated by the Center for Disease Control, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Cal/OSHA, California Department of
Public Health or applicable local public health agencies.' The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Carpenters International Training Fund has developed COVID-19 Training and Certification to ensure that Carpenter union members and apprentices conduct safe work practices. The Agency should require that all construction workers undergo COVID-19 Training and Certification before being allowed to conduct construction activities at the Project Site.

Southwest Mountain States Carpenters has also developed a rigorous Infection Control Risk Assessment ("ICRA") training program to ensure it delivers a workforce that understands how to identify and control infection risks by implementing protocols to 6 See also The Center for Construction Research and Training, North America's Building Trades Unions (April 27 2020) NABTU and CPWR COVIC-19 Standards for U.S Constructions Sites, available at https://www.cpwr.com/sites/default/files/NABTU CPWR Standards COVID-19.pdf; Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (2020) Guidelines for Construction Sites During COVID-19 Pandemic, available at https://dpw.lacounty.gov/building-and-safety/docs/pw guidelines-construction-sites.pdf.

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 9, 2023

Page 8 of 9 ends

protect themselves and all others during renovation and construction projects in healthcare environments.'
ICRA protocols are intended to contain pathogens, control airflow, and protect patients during the construction, maintenance and renovation of healthcare facilities.

ICRA protocols prevent cross contamination, minimizing the risk of secondary infections in patients at hospital facilities.

The City should require the Project to be built using a workforce trained in ICRA protocols.

III. THE CITY MUST PREPARE AN EIR FOR THE PROJECT
CEQA is a California statute designed to inform decision makers and the public about the potential, significant environmental effects of a project. 14 California Code of Regulations ("CEQA Guidelines") § 15002(a)(1).' At its core, "[i]ts purpose is to inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of their decisions before they are made." Citizens of Goleta Valley P. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal. 3d 553, 564.

CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines are strict and unambiguous about when a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") may be used. A public agency must prepare an EIR whenever substantial evidence supports a "fair argument" that a proposed project "may have a significant effect on the environment." Pub. Res. Code, 55 21100, 21151; CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15002, subds. (�(1)-(2), 15063; No Oil, Inc., 13 Cal.3d at p. 75; Communities for a Better Environment P. California Resources Agency (2002) 103 Cal.AppAth 98, 111-112. Essentially, should a lead agency be presented with a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency shall prepare an EIR even though it may also be presented with other substantial evidence that the project will not have a significant effect. CEQA Guidelines, 55 15064, subds. (�(1)-(2); see No Oil Inc., supra, 13 Ca1.3d at p. 75 (internal citations and quotations omitted).

For details concerning Southwest Carpenters's ICRA training program, see https://icrahealthcare.com/ .
$ The CEQA Guidelines, codified in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, section 15000 et seq, are regulatory guidelines promulgated by the state Natural Resources Agency for the implementation of CEQA. (Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.) The CEQA Guidelines are given "great weight in interpreting CEQA except when ... clearly unauthorized or erroneous." Center for Biological Diversity P. Department of Fisb dam' Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal. 4th 204, 217.

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 9, 2023

Page 9 of 10 ends

Substantial evidence includes "enough relevant information and reasonable inferences from this information that a fair argument can be made to support a conclusion, even though other conclusions might also be reached." CEQA Guidelines, 5 15384(a).

The fair argument standard is a "low threshold" test for requiring the preparation of an EIR. No Oil Inc., supra, 13 Cal.3d at p. 84; County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 of Los Angeles County v. County of Kern (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1544, 1579. It "requires the preparation of an EIR where there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project, either individually or cumulatively, may cause a significant effect on the environment, regardless of whether the overall effect of the project is adverse or beneficial[.]" County Sanitation, supra, 127 Cal.App.4th at p. 1580 (quoting CEQA Guidelines, § 15063(b)(1)).

A lead agency may adopt an MND only if "there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment." CEQA Guidelines, 15074(b).

Evidence supporting a fair argument of a significant environmental impact triggers preparation of an EIR regardless of whether the record contains contrary evidence.

League for Protection of Oakland's Architectural and Historical Resources V. City of Oakland (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 896, 904-905. "Where the question is the sufficiency of the evidence to support a fair argument, deference to the agency's determination is not appropriate[.]" County Sanitation, 127 Cal.App.4th at 1579 (quoting Sierra Club P. County of Sonoma (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1307, 1317-1318).

In cases where it is not clear whether there is substantial evidence of significant environmental impacts, CEQA requires erring on the side of a "preference for resolving doubts in favor of environmental review." Mjia a City of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322, 332 "The foremost principle under CEQA is that the Legislature intended the act to be interpreted in such manner as to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language. Friends of Mammotb P. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Ca1.3d 247, 259.

As explained below, the MND repeatedly fails to support its findings with substantial evidence and conduct all necessary analysis. Therefore, there is a fair argument that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment, triggering the "low threshold" standard for preparation of an EIR. Thus, the City must prepare an EIR for the Project.

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 9, 2023

Page 10 of 11 ends

IV. THE CITY MUST, AT THE VERY LEAST, REVISE AND

RECIRCULATE THE MND
Section 15073.5 of the CEQA Guidelines provides that a negative declaration must be recirculated whenever the document must be substantially revised. A substantial revision includes the identification of new, avoidable significant effects requiring mitigation measures or project revisions to be added to reduce the effect to less than significant levels or upon the agency determining that a proposed mitigation measure or project change would not reduce a potential impact to insignificance. Id.

Additionally, when new information is brought to light showing that an impact previously discussed in an MND and found to be insignificant with or without mitigation in the MND's analysis has the potential for a significant environmental impact supported by substantial evidence, the MND must consider and resolve the conflict in the evidence. See Visalia Retail, L.P. V. City of Visalia (2018) 20 Cal. App. 5th 1, 13, 17; see also Protect the Historic Amador Wlatenvays v. Amador WlaterAgency (2004) 116 Cal. App. 4th 1099, 1109.

In light of the MND's failure to substantiate all of its findings and conduct sufficient analysis, as discussed below, the Project requires significant revisions and resolution of conflicts in evidence. Therefore, at a minimum, the City must revise and recirculate the MND if it does not prepare an EIR for the Project.

A. The MND Omits Analysis Concerning Operational Air Quality Impacts to Senesitive Receptors
CEQA requires that an environmental document identify and discuss the significant effects of a Project, alternatives and how those significant effects can be mitigated or avoided. CEQA Guidelines § 15126.2; PRC §§ 21100(b)(1), 21002.1(a). An environmental document's discussion of potentially significant effects must "provide an adequate analysis to inform the public how its bare numbers translate to create potential adverse impacts or it must adequately explain what the agency does know and why, given existing scientific constraints, it cannot translate potential health impacts further." Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal. 5th 502, 521; see also citing Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal. 3d 376, 405; see also PRC §§ 21002.1(e), 21003(b).

Here, the MND fails to comply with these requirements. Although the MND acknowledges there would be sensitive receptors due to the adjacent residences, it

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 9, 2023

Page 11 of 12 ends

limits the impact of the sensitive receptors to paving activities from the construction and fails to account for impacts stemming from the Project's operational use. MND at

13. This is particularly disconcerting given the severity of potential air quality impacts on nearby residents given the Project's gas station where small routine gas spills vaporize into the air.9 Without such analysis, the MND less than significant impacts finding is merely speculative. The MND must be revised to include this analysis.

B. The MND Fails to Supbort its Biological Resource Impact Findings with Substantail Evidence
As with its air quality impact finding, the MND similarly fails to support its less than significant biological resource impact finding with substantial evidence. Although, the MND blanketly concludes that the Project does not "feature any candidate, sensitive, or special status species, riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community, wetlands; and wildlife corridors", it bases such conclusion solely on a "visual site investigation" which found that the Project site is disturbed. MND at 14. Such analysis, or lack thereof, is entirely lacking.

First, the MND fails to attach the actual findings and data of the visual investigation for public review and input. Such omission runs contrary to the CEQA requirement that an environmental document must provide or attach the technical details and data it relies upon, rather than mere conclusory findings, to support its determinations.

CEQA Guidelines �§ 15147; 15148; 15150; San Franciscans for Reasonable Growtb V. City dam; County of San Francisco (1987) 193 Cal.App.3d 1544. 1549. The MND must be revised to include the visual investigation data it relies upon.

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 9, 2023

Page 12 of 13 ends

Guidelines § 15126.2(b) [energy analysis "should include the project's energy use for all project phases and components, including transportation -related energy, during construction and operation"]. Rather, the MND improperly relies almost entirely on regulatory compliance to conclude that the Project will not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary energy. Californian forAlternatives to Toxics V. Department of Food damp; Agric. (2005) 136 Cal. App. 4th 1 [reliance upon regulatory compliance to prevent significant adverse impacts must be based on a project -specific analysis of potential impacts and the effect of regulatory compliance]. The MND must be revised to provide Project -specific quantitative analysis of the Project's expected energy use during all of its phases before speculating that its impacts will be less than significant.

D. The MND Fails to Analyze and Mitigate Routine Gas Spills in its Geology/Soils and Hydrology/Water Quality Sections
Studies have shown that small spills that routinely occur at gas stations when consumers refill their tanks have the potential to cause significant groundwater and soil impacts. Specifically, as noted by Markus Hilpert, a senior scientist in the Department of Environmental Health Sciences in the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health:

Over the lifespan of a gas station... concrete pads underneath the pumps can accumulate significant amounts of gasoline, which can eventually penetrate the concrete and escape into underlying soil and groundwater, potentially impacting the health of those who use wells as a water source. Conservatively, the researchers estimate, roughly 1,500 liters of gasoline are spilled at a typical gas station each decade. Even if only a small percentage reaches the ground, this could be problematic because gasoline contains harmful chemicals including benzene, a known human carcinogen. (Small Spills Article.) Given the potential for these harmful impacts, it is imperative to prevent rainwater from flowing over the concrete pads underneath the pumps. Otherwise, storm runoff gets contaminated with benzene and other harmful chemicals and can infiltrate into adjacent soil patches or form storm water that may end up in natural bodies of water.

Id. Accordingly, the MND must assess these impacts and implement mitigation measures to mitigate their potential.

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 9, 2023

Page 13 of 14 ends

E...... The MND Fails to Assess the Project's Consistency with the General Plan Policies and Goals and Other Pertinent Plans in its Land Use and Planning Anal
Each California city and county must adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan governing development. Napa Citi.Zens for Honest Gov. P. Napa County Bd. of Supervisors (2001) 91 Cal. AppAth 342, 352, citing Gov. Code §§ 65030, 65300. The general plan sits at the top of the land use planning hierarchy (See DeVita P. County of Napa (1995) 9 Cal. App. 4th 763, 773), and serves as a "constitution" or "charter" for all future development. Lesber Communications, Inc. v. City of ilalnut Creek (1990) 52 Cal. App. 3d 531, 540.

General plan consistency is "the linchpin of California's land use and development laws." See Debottari P. Norco City Council (1985) 171 Cal. App. 3d 1204, 1213. It is well established that development projects may not be approved if they interfere with, or frustrate, the general Alan's policies and objectives. See Napa Citi.Zens, 91 Ca1.App.4th at 378-79; see also Lesber, 52 Ca1.3d at 544.

Here, the MND is barren of information and analysis on land use consistency as it does not provide any substantive analysis of consistency with the goals and policies identified in the City's General Plan. Rather, the MND merely makes a conclusory statement that no policies or plans exist for avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect that have not been taken into account. MND at 24. This is not sufficient analysis as it does not actually address any goals or policies identified in the General Plan. Nor does the MND analyze consistency with any regional plan goals and policies such as the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Without conducting this analysis, the MND's less than significant finding is simply unsupported.

V. CONCLUSION
In sum, SMSWRCC requests that the City require a local workforce, that the City impose training requirements for the Project's construction activities to prevent community spread of Covid-19 and other infectious diseases, and that the City prepare an EIR for the Project or revise and recirculate the MND at the very least to address the aforementioned concerns. If the City has any questions, feel free to contact my office.

City of Yucaipa — Oak Glen Road Chevron Auto Center and Hotel Project January 9, 2023

Page 14 of 14 ends

Sincerely,
I ��
Talia Nimmer
Attorneys for Southwest Mountain
States Regional Council of Carpenters
Attached:

March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling (Exhibit A); Air Quality and GHG Expert Paul Rosenfeld CV (Exhibit B); and Air Quality and GHG Expert Matt Hagemann CV (Exhibit C).

EXHIBIT A

S� p Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
JLitigation Support for the Environment
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
March 8, 2021
Mitchell M. Tsai
155 South El Molino, Suite 104
Pasadena, CA 91101
Subject: Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling Dear Mr. Tsai,
Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise ("SWAPE") is pleased to provide the following draft technical report explaining the significance of worker trips required for construction of land use development projects with respect to the estimation of greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions. The report will also discuss the potential for local hire requirements to reduce the length of worker trips, and consequently, reduced or mitigate the potential GHG impacts.

Worker Trips and Greenhouse Gas Calculations
The California Emissions Estimator Model ("CaIEEMod") is a "statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects."' CaIEEMod quantifies construction -related emissions associated with land use projects resulting from off -road construction equipment; on -road mobile equipment associated with workers, vendors, and hauling; fugitive dust associated with grading, demolition, truck loading, and on -road vehicles traveling along paved and unpaved roads; and architectural coating activities; and paving.2
The number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CaIEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on -road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.' 1 "California Emissions Estimator Model." CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/home .

Z "California Emissions Estimator Model." CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/home . 3 "CaIEEMod User's Guide." CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 1 Specifically, the number and length of vehicle trips is utilized to estimate the vehicle miles travelled ("VMT") associated with construction. Then, utilizing vehicle -class specific EMFAC 2014 emission factors, CaIEEMod calculates the vehicle exhaust, evaporative, and dust emissions resulting from construction -related VMT, including personal vehicles for worker commuting.4
Specifically, in order to calculate VMT, CaIEEMod multiplies the average daily trip rate by the average overall trip length (see excerpt below):
"VMTd = F(Average Daily Trip Rate i * Average Overall Trip Length 1) n Where:
n = Number of land uses being modeled."'
Furthermore, to calculate the on -road emissions associated with worker trips, CaIEEMod utilizes the following equation (see excerpt below):
"EmisslonSpollutant = VMT * EFrunning,pollutant
Where:

Emissionspollutant = emissions from vehicle running for each pollutant VMT = vehicle miles traveled
EFrunning,pollutant = emission factor for running emissions."' Thus, there is a direct relationship between trip length and VMT, as well as a direct relationship between VMT and vehicle running emissions. In other words, when the trip length is increased, the VMT and vehicle running emissions increase as a result. Thus, vehicle running emissions can be reduced by decreasing the average overall trip length, by way of a local hire requirement or otherwise.

Default Worker Trip Parameters and Potential Local Hire Requirements As previously discussed, the number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CaIEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on -road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.' In order to understand how local hire requirements and associated worker trip length reductions impact GHG emissions calculations, it is important to consider the CaIEEMod default worker trip parameters. CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site -specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project - specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence.' The default number of construction -related worker trips is calculated by multiplying the 4 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14-15. 5 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, P. 23. ' "Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 7 "CalEEMod User's Guide." CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. $ CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/ , p. 1, 9. 2 number of pieces of equipment for all phases by 1.25, with the exception of worker trips required for the building construction and architectural coating phases.9 Furthermore, the worker trip vehicle class is a 50/25/25 percent mix of light duty autos, light duty truck class 1 and light duty truck class 2, respectively."10 Finally, the default worker trip length is consistent with the length of the operational home -to -work vehicle trips.11 The operational home -to -work vehicle trip lengths are:
"[B]ased on the location and urbanization selected on the project characteristic screen. These values were supplied by the air districts or use a default average for the state. Each district (or county) also assigns trip lengths for urban and rural settings" (emphasis added)." Thus, the default worker trip length is based on the location and urbanization level selected by the User when modeling emissions. The below table shows the CaIEEMod default rural and urban worker trip lengths by air basin (see excerpt below and Attachment A).13
Worker Trip Length by Air Basin
Air Basin
Rural (miles)
Urban (miles)
Great Basin Valleys

16.8 10.8
Lake County

16.8 10.8
Lake Tahoe

16.8 10.8
Mojave Desert

16.8 10.8
Mountain Counties

16.8 10.8
North Central Coast

17.1 12.3
North Coast

16.8 10.8
Northeast Plateau

16.8 10.8
Sacramento Valley

16.8 10.8
Salton Sea

14.6 11
San Diego

16.8 10.8
San Francisco Bay Area

10.8 10.8
San Joaquin Valley

16.8 10.8
South Central Coast

16.8 10.8
South Coast

19.8 14.7
Average

16.47 11.17
Minimum

10.80 10.80
Maximum

19.80 14.70
Range

9.00 3.90
9 "CaIEEMod User's Guide." CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 10 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CaIEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 11 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CaIEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14. 12 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CaIEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 21. 13 "Appendix D Default Data Tables." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/05 appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-84 - D-86. 3 As demonstrated above, default rural worker trip lengths for air basins in California vary from 10.8- to 19.8- miles, with an average of 16.47 miles. Furthermore, default urban worker trip lengths vary from 10.8- to 14.7- miles, with an average of 11.17 miles. Thus, while default worker trip lengths vary by location, default urban worker trip lengths tend to be shorter in length. Based on these trends evident in the CalEEMod default worker trip lengths, we can reasonably assume that the efficacy of a local hire requirement is especially dependent upon the urbanization of the project site, as well as the project location.

Practical Application of a Local Hire Requirement and Associated Impact To provide an example of the potential impact of a local hire provision on construction -related GHG emissions, we estimated the significance of a local hire provision for the Village South Specific Plan ("Project") located in the City of Claremont ("City"). The Project proposed to construct 1,000 residential units, 100,000-SF of retail space, 45,000-SF of office space, as well as a 50-room hotel, on the 24-acre site. The Project location is classified as Urban and lies within the Los Angeles -South Coast County. As a result, the Project has a default worker trip length of 14.7 miles.14 In an effort to evaluate the potential for a local hire provision to reduce the Project's construction -related GHG emissions, we prepared an updated model, reducing all worker trip lengths to 10 miles (see Attachment B). Our analysis estimates that if a local hire provision with a 10-mile radius were to be implemented, the GHG emissions associated with Project construction would decrease by approximately 17% (see table below and Attachment C).

Local Hire Provision Net Change
Without Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e)
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year)
3,623
120.77
With Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e)
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year)
% Decrease in Construction -related GHG Emissions
3,024
100.80
17%
As demonstrated above, by implementing a local hire provision requiring 10 mile worker trip lengths, the Project could reduce potential GHG emissions associated with construction worker trips. More broadly, any local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction -related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site.

This serves as an example of the potential impacts of local hire requirements on estimated project -level GHG emissions, though it does not indicate that local hire requirements would result in reduced construction -related GHG emission for all projects. As previously described, the significance of a local hire requirement depends on the worker trip length enforced and the default worker trip length for the project's urbanization level and location.
14 "Appendix D Default Data Tables." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/05 appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-85. 4 Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,
G
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.
�p
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
5 Attachment A
Rural H-W
Urban H-W
Location Type
Location Name
(miles)
(miles)
Air Basin
Great Basin

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
Lake County

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
Lake Tahoe

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
Mojave Desert

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
Mountain

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
North Central

17.1 12.3
Air Basin
North Coast

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
Northeast

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
Sacramento

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
Salton Sea

14.6 11
Air Basin
San Diego

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
San Francisco

10.8 10.8
Air Basin
San Joaquin

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
South Central

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
South Coast

19.8 14.7
Air District
Amador County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Antelope Valley

16.8 10.8
Air District
Bay Area AQMD

10.8 10.8
Air District
Butte County

12.54 12.54
Air District
Calaveras

16.8 10.8
Air District
Colusa County

16.8 10.8
Air District
El Dorado

16.8 10.8
Air District
Feather River

16.8 10.8
Air District
Glenn County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Great Basin

16.8 10.8
Air District
Imperial County

10.2 7.3
Air District
Kern County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Lake County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Lassen County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Mariposa

16.8 10.8
Air District
Mendocino

16.8 10.8
Air District
Modoc County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Mojave Desert

16.8 10.8
Air District
Monterey Bay

16.8 10.8
Air District
North Coast

16.8 10.8
Air District
Northern Sierra

16.8 10.8
Air District
Northern

16.8 10.8
Air District
Placer County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Sacramento
15 10

Air District
San Diego

16.8 10.8
Air District
San Joaquin

16.8 10.8
Air District
San Luis Obispo
13 13
Air District
Santa Barbara

8.3 8.3
Air District
Shasta County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Siskiyou County

16.8 10.8
Air District
South Coast

19.8 14.7
Air District
Tehama County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Tuolumne

16.8 10.8
Air District
Ventura County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Yolo/Solano
15 10
County
Alameda

10.8 10.8
County
Alpine

16.8 10.8
County
Amador

16.8 10.8
County
Butte

12.54 12.54
County
Calaveras

16.8 10.8
County
Colusa

16.8 10.8
County
Contra Costa

10.8 10.8
County
Del Norte

16.8 10.8
County
El Dorado -Lake

16.8 10.8
County
El Dorado-

16.8 10.8
County
Fresno

16.8 10.8
County
Glenn

16.8 10.8
County
Humboldt

16.8 10.8
County
Imperial

10.2 7.3
County
Inyo

16.8 10.8
County
Kern -Mojave

16.8 10.8
County
Kern -San

16.8 10.8
County
Kings

16.8 10.8
County
Lake

16.8 10.8
County
Lassen

16.8 10.8
County
Los Angeles-

19.8 14.7
County
Madera

16.8 10.8
County
Marin

10.8 10.8
County
Mariposa

16.8 10.8
County
Mendocino-

16.8 10.8
County
Merced

16.8 10.8
County
Modoc

16.8 10.8
County
Mono

16.8 10.8
County
Monterey

16.8 10.8
County
Napa

10.8 10.8

County
Nevada

16.8 10.8
County
Orange

19.8 14.7
County
Placer -Lake

16.8 10.8
County
Placer -Mountain

16.8 10.8
County
Placer-

16.8 10.8
County
Plumas

16.8 10.8
County
Riverside-

19.8 14.7
County
Riverside -Salton

14.6 11
County
Riverside -South

19.8 14.7
County
Sacramento
15 10
County
San Benito

16.8 10.8
County
San Bernardino-

19.8 14.7
County
San Diego

16.8 10.8
County
San Francisco

10.8 10.8
County
San Joaquin

16.8 10.8
County
San Luis Obispo
13 13
County
San Mateo

10.8 10.8
County
Santa Barbara-

8.3 8.3
County
Santa Barbara-

8.3 8.3
County
Santa Clara

10.8 10.8
County
Santa Cruz

16.8 10.8
County
Shasta

16.8 10.8
County
Sierra

16.8 10.8
County
Siskiyou

16.8 10.8
County
Solano-
15 10
County
Solano-San

16.8 10.8
County
Sonoma -North

16.8 10.8
County
Sonoma -San

10.8 10.8
County
Stanislaus

16.8 10.8
County
Sutter

16.8 10.8
County
Tehama

16.8 10.8
County
Trinity

16.8 10.8
County
Tulare

16.8 10.8
County
Tuolumne

16.8 10.8
County
Ventura

16.8 10.8
County
Yolo
15 10
County
Yuba

16.8 10.8
Statewide
Statewide

16.8 10.8

Worker
Air Basin
Great Basin Valleys
Lake County
Lake Tahoe
Mojave Desert
Mountain Counties
North Central Coast
North Coast
Northeast Plateau
Sacramento Valley
Salton Sea
San Diego
San Francisco Bay Area
San Joaquin Valley
South Central Coast
South Coast
Average
Mininum
Maximum
Range
igth by Air Basin
Rural (miles)

16.8 16.8

16.8 17.1

16.8 16.8

16.8 14.6

16.8 10.8

16.8 16.8

19.8 16.47

10.80 19.80

9.00 Urban (miles)

10.8 10.8

10.8 12.3

10.8 10.8

10.8 11

10.8 10.8

14.7 11.17

10.80 14.70

3.90 Attachment B
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 44
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building

45.00 +
1000sgft
; 1.03
45,000.00
i 0
---------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- -
h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 +
High
= — — ;--------------------
1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0
-----------------------------_------------------------------ _------------------------------ Hotel 50.00 +
= — -- —;------------- -------
Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0
-----------y----------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 +
= --- ---—;--------------------
1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0
----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- Apartments Low Rise 25.00 +
= --- ---------
—;-------------
Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72
-----------------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------=-----------------------i------------------+--------------- Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 +
Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 i 2789
------------------------------ _------------------------------ _----------------------------- --------------}------------------E-------------
Regional Shopping Center

56.00 1000sgft

1.29 56,000.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2028
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr)

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.

Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.

Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.

Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.

Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.

Energy Use -
Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation.

Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWood Mass IT 1,019.20

0.00 ----------------------------
tblFireplaces
------------------------------ r-------------------------------------------------------- FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00
-------------p-------------_-------------------
tblFire laces
------------ --------------------------
NumberWood r 1.25 0.00
----------------------------
tblFireplaces
------------------------------r----------------------------- ------------------------- NumberWood 48.75 0.00
---------------------------_-----------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------ -------------------------
ST_TR r 7.16 6.17
-----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------------------------r------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 6.39 3.87
-----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 2.46 1.39
----------------------------_-----------------
tblVehicleTrips
--------------------------------------
ST_TR r 158.37 79.82
----------------------------_-----------------
tblVehicleTrips
--------------------------------------
ST_TR r 8.19 3.75
----------------------------_-----------------
tblVehicleTrips
---------------------------------------
ST_TR r 94.36 63.99
----------------------------_-----------------
tblVehicleTrips
---------------------------------------
ST_TR r 49.97 10.74
----------------------------_-----------------
tblVehicleTrips
---------------------------------------
SU_TR r 6.07 6.16
-----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- SU_TR 5.86 4.18
----------------------------_-----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips
---------------------------------------
SU_TR r 1.05 0.69
-----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------------------------t------------------------------ -------------------------- SU_TR 131.84 78.27

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

5.95 3.20
-----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips

Y----------------------------
SU_TR
�-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 72.16

57.65 tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
} 25.24

6.39 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
} 6.59

5.83 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
} 6.65

4.13 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
} 11.03

6.41 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
} 127.15

65.80 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
} 8.17

3.84 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
} 89.95

62.64 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
} 42.70

9.43 tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
} 1.25

0.00 tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
} 48.75

0.00 tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
} 1.25

0.00 tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
} 48.75

0.00 tblWoodstoves
Wood stove DayYear
} 25.00

0.00 tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWood Mass
i 999.60

0.00 tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWood Mass
999.60

0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2021 •i 0.1713 i 1.8242 � 1.1662 i 2.4000e- 0.4169 0.0817 i 0.4986 0.1795 i 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 i 213.1969 213.1969 i 0.0601 0.0000 214.6993 003
-------------
2022 •i 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 i 1,721.682 1,721.682 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918 i � i � � i � i � � i �
'� i i i i i i i i • 1 6 i 6 i i i 7
2023 •i 0.6148 i 3.3649 � 5.6747 i 0.0178 � 1.1963 � 0.0996 i 1.2959 � 0.3203 i 0.0935 0.4138 � 0.0000 i 1,627.529 1,627.529 i 0.1185 0.0000 1,630.492 '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 i i 5
2024 •1 4.1619 i 0.1335 0.2810 i 5.9000e- 0.0325 6.4700e- i 0.0390 8.6300e- i 6.0400e- 0.0147 0.0000 i 52.9078 52.9078 i 8.0200e- 0.0000 1 53.1082 004 003 003 003 : 003 i
Maximum

4.1619

4.1142

6.1625

0.0189

1.3058

0.1201

1.4259

0.3460

0.1128

0.4588

0.0000
1,721.682
1,721.682

0.1294

0.0000
1,724.918
6 6
7 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

2.1 Overall Construction
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2021 •i 0.1713 i 1.8242 � 1.1662 i 2.4000e- 0.4169 0.0817 i 0.4986 0.1795 i 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 i 213.1967 � 213.1967 i 0.0601 0.0000 214.6991 003
2022 •i 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 i 1,721.682 1,721.682 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918 i � i � � i � i � � i
3 i 3 i i i 3
2023 •i 0.6148 i 3.3648 5.6747 i 0.0178 1.1963 0.0996 i 1.2959 0.3203 i 0.0935 0.4138 0.0000 i 1,627.529 1,627.529 i 0.1185 0.0000 1,630.492 2024 •1 4.1619 i 0.1335 0.2810 i 5.9000e- 0.0325 6.4700e- i 0.0390 8.6300e- i 6.0400e- 0.0147 0.0000 i 52.9077 52.9077 i 8.0200e- 0.0000 53.1082 004 003 003 003 : 003 i
Maximum

4.1619

4.1142

6.1625

0.0189

1.3058

0.1201

1.4259

0.3460

0.1128

0.4588

0.0000
1,721.682
1,721.682

0.1294

0.0000
1,724.918
3 3
3 ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio-0O2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Reduction
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 9-1-2021
11-30-2021

1.4103

1.4103
2 12-1-2021
2-28-2022

1.3613

1.3613
3 3-1-2022
5-31-2022

1.1985

1.1985
4 6-1-2022
8-31-2022

1.1921

1.1921
5 9-1-2022
11-30-2022

1.1918

1.1918
6 12-1-2022
2-28-2023

1.0774

1.0774
7 3-1-2023
5-31-2023

1.0320

1.0320
8 6-1-2023
8-31-2023

1.0260

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 9 9-1-2023
11-30-2023

1.0265

1.0265
10 12-1-2023
2-29-2024

2.8857

2.8857
11 3-1-2024
5-31-2024

1.6207

1.6207
Highest

2.8857

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 i 10.3804 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 i i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 i 220.9670 i 0.0201 i 3.7400e- 222.5835 Energy •i 0.1398 i 1.2312 i 0.7770 7.6200e- i i 0.0966 i 0.0966 i i 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1 3,896.073 i 3,896.073 i 0.1303 i 0.0468 3,913.283 003 i i i i i 2 i 2 i i 3
;� i i i i
Mobile •1 1.5857 i 7.9962 i 19.1834 i 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 i 7.8559 i 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 1 7,620.498 7,620.498 i 0.3407 0.0000 1 7,629.016 '1 i i i i i i i i 1 6 i 6 i i 1 2
Waste •1 i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 i 0.0000 207.8079 i 12.2811 0.0000 1 514.8354 ------------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- -------------- ----------------------*------r------ ---------------j-------*------- Water •1 i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 � 29.1632 i 556.6420 � 585.8052 i 3.0183 � 0.0755 � 683.7567 Total

6.8692

9.5223

30.3407

0.0914

7.7979

0.2260

8.0240

2.0895

0.2219

2.3114
236.9712
12,294.18
12,531.15

15.7904

0.1260
12,963.47
j
j
j
j
07 19
j
51 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

2.2 Overall Operational
Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 10.3804 i 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 � i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 � 220.9670 i 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 003 003 i
Energy •i 0.1398 i 1.2312 0.7770 i 7.6200e- 0.0966 i 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 i 3,896.073 3,896.073 i 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283 003 i i i i i 2 i 2 i i i 3
Mobile •i 1.5857 i 7.9962 19.1834 i 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 i 7.8559 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 i 7,620.498 7,620.498 i 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016 6 i 6 i i i 2
Waste •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 i 0.0000 207.8079 i 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 • 29.1632 i 556.6420 585.8052 i 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total

6.8692

9.5223

30.3407

0.0914

7.7979

0.2260

8.0240

2.0895

0.2219

2.3114
236.9712
12,294.18
12,531.15

15.7904

0.1260
12,963.47
07 19
51 ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Reduction

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 ;Demolition +Demolition
19/1/2021
110/12/2021
5:
30:
+
i
2 :Site Preparation +Site Preparation
110/13/2021
:11/9/2021
5:
20:
+
i
3 •Grading +Grading
111/10/2021
:1/11/2022
5:
45:
+
i
4 -Building Construction +Building Construction
11/12/2022
:12/12/2023
5:
500:
+
i
5 -Paving +Paving
112/13/2023
:1/30/2024
5:
35:
+
i
6 -Architectural Coating -Architectural Coating
1/31/2024
3/19/2024

5. 35,
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft)
OffRoad Equipment

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition
'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001
81 •

0.73 --------------------------
�- - --------------------------
-----------
Demolition
+Excavators ; 3 8.001
158•

0.38 + _ i
_
Demolition
'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001
247•

0.40 --------------------------
�- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Site Preparation
'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 3 8.001
247•

0.40 ----------------------------
_ i
-------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- -----------
Site Preparation
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 41 8.001
97•

0.37 i
�- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Grading
+Excavators ; 2 8.001
158•

0.38 --------------------------
�- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Grading
'Graders ; 1 8.001
187•

0.41 --------------------------
�- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Grading
'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 8.001
247•

0.40 ----------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- -----------
Grading
'Scrapers ; 21 8.001
367•

0.48 i
�- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Grading
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 2 8.001
97•

0.37 ----------------------------
_ i
-------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- -----------
Building Construction
'Cranes ; 11 7.001
231,

0.29 �_ i
- - - --------------------------
-----------
Building Construction
'Forklifts ; 3 8.001
89•

0.20 + _ __ i i
_
Building Construction
'Generator Sets ; 1 8.001
_
84•

0.74 �_
_ i
- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Building Construction
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 3 7.001
_
97•

0.37 + __ i
i
Building Construction
'Welders ; 1 8.001
46•

0.45 �- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Paving
+Pavers ; 2 8.001
130•

0.42 ---------------------------
�- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Paving
'Paving Equipment ; 21 8.001
132•

0.36 i
�- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Paving
'Rollers ; 2 8.001
80•

0.38 ----------------------------
--------------------------*-----------------F------------ r------------- -----------
Architectural Coating
•Air Compressors 1 • 6.00•
78•

0.48 Trips and VMT

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A
6;

15.00"

0.001
458.00;

14.70:

6.90;

20.00:LD_Mix
1HDT_Mix
(HHDT
-------------
Site Preparation
7;
-----_--,

18.00:
--------i

0.001

0.00:
---------

14.70:
------------------------

6.90;

20.00;LD_Mix
----------r--------_
;HDT_Mix
;HHDT
�-
--------------- °
Grading
-------------;
8;
i------------

20.00:
--------i

0.001
,----------�-

0.00:
--------------------------

14.70:

6.90;

20.00.LD_Mix
------'
iHDT_Mix
--
EHHDT
----------------°
�-
Building Construction v
-------------=---------------''''-,
9;
i----------i-
801.00-
I --------i
143.001
,-

0.00:
---------' ---------
�-

14.70:
------------------------�----------'

6.90,

20.00;LD_Mix
iHDT_Mix
--------
;HHDT
°
�-
Paving
--------------
6;
- i------------

15.00:
--------i

0.001
,----------4-

0.00:
----------

14.70:

6.90;
-------------'

20.00;LD_Mix
iHDT_Mix
--
EHHDT
i
f
;
Architectural Coating ;
1;
160.00,

0.00,

14.70,

6.90,

20.00,LD_Mix
;HDT_Mix
HHDT

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

3.2 Demolition - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •i , , , , 0.0496 , 0.0000 , 0.0496 , 7.5100e- , 0.0000 ; 7.5100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0475 , 0.4716 , 0.3235 , 5.8000e- , , 0.0233 , 0.0233 , , 0.0216 ; 0.0216 0.0000 i 51.0012 , 51.0012 , 0.0144 , 0.0000 i 51.3601 004
Total

0.0475

0.4716

0.3235

5.8000e-

0.0496

0.0233

0.0729

7.5100e-

0.0216

0.0291

0.0000

51.0012

0.0144

0.0000

51.3601
004
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.2 Demolition - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
I
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 1.9300e- i 0.0634 i 0.0148 1.8000e- i 3.9400e- 1.9000e- 4.1300e- i 1.0800e- 1.8000e- 1.2600e- 0.0000 i 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e- i 0.0000 i 17.4869 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 9.7000e- 7.5000e- 8.5100e- 2.000Oe- 2.4700e- 2.000Oe- 2.4900e- 6.5000e- 2.000Oe- 6.7000e- 0.0000 i 2.2251 2.2251 7.000Oe- 0.0000 i 2.2267 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005
Total

2.9000e-

0.0641

0.0233

2.000Oe-

6.4100e-

2.1000e-

6.6200e-

1.7300e-

2.000Oe-

1.9300e-

0.0000

19.6816

1.2800e-

0.0000

19.7136
11 003
004
003
004
003
003
004
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
I Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 i 7.5100e- 0.0000 7.5100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 003
Off -Road •i 0.0475 i 0.4716 i 0.3235 5.8000e- 0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 i 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 i 0.0000 i 51.3600 004
Total

0.0475

0.4716

0.3235

5.8000e-

0.0496

0.0233

0.0729

7.5100e-

0.0216

0.0291

0.0000

51.0011

0.0144

0.0000

51.3600
004
003
1 j

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.2 Demolition - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
I
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr

I I I I I I I I I I I
Hauling •I 1.9300e- I 0.0634 I 0.0148 11.8000e- 13.9400e- I 1.9000e- 14.1300e- I 1.0800e- 11.8000e- 1.2600e- 0.0000 I 17.4566 I 17.4566 11.2100e- I 0.0000 i 17.4869 �I 003 I I I 004 I 003 I 004 I 003 I 003 I 004 003003 I I-

I I I I I I I I I I I
Vendor •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000

I I I I I I I I I- I I I
Worker •I 9.7000e- 6.7000e- � 0.0000 I 2.2251 2.2251 0.0000 i 2.2267

17.5000e- 18.5100e- 12.00OOe- 12.4700e- 12.00OOe- 12.4900e- 16.5000e- 12.00OOe- I 17.00OOe- I 'I
004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 005 � Total

2.9000e-

0.0641

0.0233

2.00OOe-

6.4100e-

2.1000e-

6.6200e-

1.7300e-

2.00OOe-

1.9300e-

0.0000

19.6816

1.2800e-

0.0000

19.7136
11 003
004
003
004
003
003
004
003
003

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr

I I I I I I I I I I I
Fugitive Dust •I I I I I 0.1807 I 0.0000 I 0.1807 I 0.0993 I 0.0000 0.0993 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I 1 I I I
•I I

I I I I I I I I I I I
Off -Road •I 0.0389 I 0.4050 I 0.2115 13.8000e- I I 0.0204 I 0.0204 I I 0.0188 � 0.0188 � 0.0000 I 33.4357 I 33.4357 I 0.0108 I 0.0000 i 33.7061 004 I I I I 1 I I I I
Total

0.0389

0.4050

0.2115

3.8000e-

0.1807

0.0204

0.2011

0.0993

0.0188

0.1181

0.0000

33.4357

0.0108

0.0000

33.7061
004

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

I I I I I I I I I I
Hauling •I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I-

I I I I I I I I I I I
Vendor •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •I 7.7000e- 1.9700e- 5.4000e- 0.0000 I 1.7801 1.7801 0.0000 i 1.7814

16.000Oe- 16.8100e- 12.000Oe- I 12.000Oe- 11.9900e- 15.2000e- 11.000Oe- I 15.000Oe- I 'I
004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 005 � Total

7.7000e-

6.000Oe-

6.8100e-

2.000Oe-

1.9700e-

2.000Oe-

1.9900e-

5.2000e-

1.000Oe-

5.4000e-

0.0000

1.7801

5.000Oe-

0.0000

1.7814
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr

I I I I I I I I I I I
Fugitive Dust •I I I I I 0.1807 I 0.0000 I 0.1807 I 0.0993 I 0.0000 0.0993 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I 1 I I I
•I I

I I I I I I I I I I I
Off -Road •I 0.0389 I 0.4050 I 0.2115 13.8000e- I I 0.0204 I 0.0204 I I 0.0188 � 0.0188 � 0.0000 I 33.4357 I 33.4357 I 0.0108 I 0.0000 i 33.7060 004 I I I I 1 I I I I
Total

0.0389

0.4050

0.2115

3.8000e-

0.1807

0.0204

0.2011

0.0993

0.0188

0.1181

0.0000

33.4357

0.0108

0.0000

33.7060
004

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 - ------------------------------------------'------------------ - - -- -- - -+-------------'--------------- ------- Worker •i 7.7000e- 6.00OOe- 6.8100e- 2.00OOe- 1.9700e- 2.00OOe- 1.9900e- 5.2000e- 1.00OOe- 5.4000e- 0.0000 i 1.7801 1.7801 5.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.7814 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005
Total

7.7000e-

6.00OOe-

6.8100e-

2.00OOe-

1.9700e-

2.00OOe-

1.9900e-

5.2000e-

1.00OOe-

5.4000e-

0.0000

1.7801

5.00OOe-

0.0000

1.7814
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005

3.4 Grading - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 i 0.0693 i 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0796 i 0.8816 i 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 i 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 i 0.0000 i 104.3776 003
Total

0.0796

0.8816

0.5867

1.1800e-

0.1741

0.0377

0.2118

0.0693

0.0347

0.1040

0.0000
103.5405
103.5405

0.0335

0.0000
104.3776
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.4 Grading - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 1.6400e- 1.2700e- 0.0144 4.000Oe- 4.1600e- 3.000Oe- 4.2000e- 1.1100e- 3.000Oe- 1.1400e- 0.0000 i 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 0.0000 i 3.7607 i i i i i
003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 i
Total

1.6400e-

1.2700e-

0.0144

4.000Oe-

4.1600e-

3.000Oe-

4.2000e-

1.1100e-

3.000Oe-

1.1400e-

0.0000

3.7579

1.1000e-

0.0000

3.7607
11 003
003
005
003
005
003
003
005
003
004
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 i 0.0693 i 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0796 i 0.8816 i 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 i 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 i 0.0000 i 104.3775 003
Total

0.0796

0.8816

0.5867

1.1800e-

0.1741

0.0377

0.2118

0.0693

0.0347

0.1040

0.0000
103.5403
103.5403

0.0335

0.0000
104.3775
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.4 Grading - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 1.6400e- 1.2700e- 0.0144 4.00OOe- 4.1600e- 3.00OOe- 4.2000e- 1.1100e- 3.00OOe- 1.1400e- 0.0000 i 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 0.0000 i 3.7607 i i i i i
003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 i
Total

1.6400e-

1.2700e-

0.0144

4.00OOe-

4.1600e-

3.00OOe-

4.2000e-

1.1100e-

3.00OOe-

1.1400e-

0.0000

3.7579

1.1000e-

0.0000

3.7607
11 003
003
005
003
005
003
003
005
003
004

3.4 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 0.0807 i 0.0000 i 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 5.7200e- 5.7200e- 5.2600e- 5.2600e- 0.0000 i 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 i 19.2414 i i i
004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Total

0.0127

0.1360

0.1017

2.2000e-

0.0807

5.7200e-

0.0865

0.0180

5.2600e-

0.0233

0.0000

19.0871

6.1700e-

0.0000

19.2414
004
003
003
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.4 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 2.8000e- 2.1000e- 2.4400e- 1.000Oe- 7.7000e- 1.000Oe- 7.7000e- 2.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 0.0000 i 0.6679 0.6679 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.6684 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005
Total

2.8000e-

2.1000e-

2.4400e-

1.0000e-

7.7000e-

1.000Oe-

7.7000e-

2.000Oe-

1.000Oe-

2.1000e-

0.0000

0.6679

2.000Oe-

0.0000

0.6684
11 004
004
003
005
004
005
004
004
005
004
005
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 0.0807 i 0.0000 i 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 5.7200e- 5.7200e- 5.2600e- 5.2600e- 0.0000 i 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 i 19.2414 i i i
004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Total

0.0127

0.1360

0.1017

2.2000e-

0.0807

5.7200e-

0.0865

0.0180

5.2600e-

0.0233

0.0000

19.0871

6.1700e-

0.0000

19.2414
004
003
003
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.4 Grading - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 2.8000e- 2.1000e- 2.4400e- 1.00OOe- 7.7000e- 1.00OOe- 7.7000e- 2.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 2.1000e- 0.0000 i 0.6679 0.6679 2.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.6684 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005
Total

2.8000e-

2.1000e-

2.4400e-

1.00OOe-

7.7000e-

1.00OOe-

7.7000e-

2.00OOe-

1.00OOe-

2.1000e-

0.0000

0.6679

2.00OOe-

0.0000

0.6684
11 004
004
003
005
004
005
004
004
005
004
005

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.2158 i 1.9754 2.0700 i 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 i i 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 i 293.1324 i 293.1324 0.0702 i 0.0000 i 294.8881 003
Total

0.2158

1.9754

2.0700

3.4100e-

0.1023

0.0963

0.0000
293.1324
293.1324

0.0702

0.0000
294.8881
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ----------------
Vendor •i 0.0527 i 1.6961 i 0.4580 4.5500e- i 0.1140 3.1800e- 0.1171 i 0.0329 3.0400e- 0.0359 0.0000 i 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 i 0.0000 i 442.6435 003 003 003 i
Worker •i 0.4088 i 0.3066 i 3.5305 0.0107 i 1.1103 8.8700e- 1.1192 i 0.2949 8.1700e- 0.3031 0.0000 i 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 i 0.0000 i 967.4773 003 003
Total

0.4616

2.0027

3.9885

0.0152

1.2243

0.0121

1.2363

0.3278

0.0112
1,408.795
1,408.795

0.0530

0.0000
1,410.120
[777000
2 2
8 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.2158 i 1.9754 i 2.0700 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 i 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 i 0.0000 i 294.8877 003
Total

0.2158

1.9754

2.0700

3.4100e-

0.1023

0.0963

0.0000
293.1321
293.1321

0.0702

0.0000
294.8877
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ----------------
Vendor •i 0.0527 i 1.6961 i 0.4580 4.5500e- i 0.1140 3.1800e- 0.1171 i 0.0329 3.0400e- 0.0359 0.0000 i 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 i 0.0000 i 442.6435 003 003 003 i
Worker •i 0.4088 i 0.3066 i 3.5305 0.0107 i 1.1103 8.8700e- 1.1192 i 0.2949 8.1700e- 0.3031 0.0000 i 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 i 0.0000 i 967.4773 003 003
Total

0.4616

2.0027

3.9885

0.0152

1.2243

0.0121

1.2363

0.3278

0.0112
1,408.795
1,408.795

0.0530

0.0000
1,410.120
[777000
2 2
8 3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road 0.1942 i 1.7765 i 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 i 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 i 0.0000 i 287.9814 003j
Total

0.1942

1.7765

2.0061

3.3300e-

0.0864

0.0813

0.0000
286.2789
286.2789

0.0681

0.0000
287.9814
003
j

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0382 i 1.2511 i 0.4011 4.3000e- i 0.1113 1.4600e- 0.1127 i 0.0321 1.4000e- 0.0335 0.0000 i 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 i 0.0000 i 418.5624 003 003 003 i
Worker •i 0.3753 i 0.2708 i 3.1696 0.0101 i 1.0840 8.4100e- 1.0924 i 0.2879 7.7400e- 0.2957 0.0000 i 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 i 0.0000 i 909.9291 003 003
Total

0.4135

1.5218

3.5707

0.0144

1.1953

9.8700e-

1.2051

0.3200

9.1400e-
1,327.336

0.0462

0.0000
1,328.491
j
003
j
j
003
j
[-377000
9 [1,327.336
9 j
6 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road 0.1942 i 1.7765 i 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 i 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 i 0.0000 i 287.9811 i i i i i • i i i i
003j
Total

0.1942

1.7765

2.0061

3.3300e-

0.0864

0.0813

0.0000
286.2785
286.2785

0.0681

0.0000
287.9811
003
j

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0382 i 1.2511 i 0.4011 4.3000e- i 0.1113 1.4600e- 0.1127 i 0.0321 1.4000e- 0.0335 0.0000 i 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 i 0.0000 i 418.5624 003 003 003 i
Worker •i 0.3753 i 0.2708 i 3.1696 0.0101 i 1.0840 8.4100e- 1.0924 i 0.2879 7.7400e- 0.2957 0.0000 i 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 i 0.0000 i 909.9291 003 003
Total

0.4135

1.5218

3.5707

0.0144

1.1953

9.8700e-

1.2051

0.3200

9.1400e-
1,327.336

0.0462

0.0000
1,328.491
j
003
j
j
003
j
[-377000
9 [1,327.336
9 j
6 3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
I
PM2.5
PM2.5
I Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 i 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 i 13.1227 i i i
•� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total

6.7100e-

0.0663

0.0948

1.5000e-

3.3200e-

3.0500e-

0.0000

13.0175

4.2100e-

0.0000
003
004
003
003
003
003
003
1 m

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 --------------------------------------------'----------------------- -+ ----�-------------'--------------� Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 3.7000e- 2.7000e- 3.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.000Oe- 1.0800e- 2.8000e- 1.000Oe- 2.9000e- 0.0000 i 0.8963 0.8963 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.8968 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005
Total

3.7000e-

2.7000e-

3.1200e-

1.0000e-

1.0700e-

1.000Oe-

1.0800e-

2.8000e-

1.000Oe-

2.9000e-

0.0000

0.8963

2.000Oe-

0.0000

0.8968
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
I
PM2.5
PM2.5
I Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 i 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 i 13.1227 i i i
•� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total

6.7100e-

0.0663

0.0948

1.5000e-

3.3200e-

3.0500e-

0.0000

13.0175

4.2100e-

0.0000
003
004
003
003
003
003
003
1 m

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.6 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ----------------------- ---------------------'------------------------ --+ ----� -------------'----00- ----00 1 000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 3.7000e- 2.7000e- 3.1200e- 1.00OOe- 1.0700e- 1.00OOe- 1.0800e- 2.8000e- 1.00OOe- 2.9000e- 0.0000 i 0.8963 0.8963 2.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.8968 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005
Total

3.7000e-

2.7000e-

3.1200e-

1.00OOe-

1.0700e-

1.00OOe-

1.0800e-

2.8000e-

1.00OOe-

2.9000e-

0.0000

0.8963

2.00OOe-

0.0000

0.8968
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005

3.6 Paving - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
I
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.0109 i 0.1048 0.1609 i 2.5000e- i i 5.1500e- i 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 i 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- i 0.0000 i 22.2073 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Paving •1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total

0.0109

0.1048

0.1609

2.5000e-

5.1500e-

4.7400e-

0.0000

22.0292

7.1200e-

0.0000

22.2073
11 004
003
003
003
003
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.6 Paving - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 5.9000e- 4.1000e- 4.9200e- 2.000Oe- 1.8100e- 1.000Oe- 1.8200e- 4.8000e- 1.000Oe- 4.9000e- 0.0000 i 1.4697 1.4697 4.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.4706 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005
Total

5.9000e-

4.1000e-

4.9200e-

2.000Oe-

1.8100e-

1.000Oe-

1.8200e-

4.8000e-

1.000Oe-

4.9000e-

0.0000

1.4697

4.000Oe-

0.0000

1.4706
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
I I
PM2.5
PM2.5
I Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e- 5.1500e- 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 i 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 0.0000 i 22.2073 i i i
•� 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Paving •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total

0.0109

0.1048

0.1609

2.5000e-

5.1500e-

4.7400e-

0.0000

22.0292

7.1200e-

0.0000
11 004
003
003
003
003
003
m

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.6 Paving - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 - ------------------------------------------'------------------ - - -- -- - -+-------------'--------------- ------- Worker •i 5.9000e- 4.1000e- 4.9200e- 2.00OOe- 1.8100e- 1.00OOe- 1.8200e- 4.8000e- 1.00OOe- 4.9000e- 0.0000 i 1.4697 1.4697 4.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.4706 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005
Total

5.9000e-

4.1000e-

4.9200e-

2.00OOe-

1.8100e-

1.00OOe-

1.8200e-

4.8000e-

1.00OOe-

4.9000e-

0.0000

1.4697

4.00OOe-

0.0000

1.4706
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •1 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1600e- 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 i 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 i 4.4745 i i i
003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i
Total

4.1404

0.0213

0.0317

5.00OOe-

1.0700e-

0.0000

4.4682

2.5000e-

0.0000

4.4745
005
003
003
003
003
004

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ��--------------------------------------------'----------------------- -+ - -------------'--.--�-------T Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 '� I
'� •
I
•
Worker •i 0.0101 6.9900e- 0.0835 2.8000e- 0.0307 2.3000e- 0.0309 8.1500e- 2.2000e- 8.3700e- 0.0000 i 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e- 0.0000 i 24.9558 i i i i � i
003 004 004 003 004 003 004 i
Total

0.0101

6.9900e-

0.0835

2.8000e-

0.0307

2.3000e-

0.0309

8.1500e-

2.2000e-

8.3700e-

0.0000

24.9407

6.1007

0.0000

24.9558
003
004
004
003
004
003
004
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •1 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1600e- 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 i 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 i 4.4745 i i i
003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i
Total

4.1404

0.0213

0.0317

5.000Oe-

1.0700e-

0.0000

4.4682

2.5000e-

0.0000

4.4745
005
003
003
003
003
004

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I
I
Worker •i 0.0101 6.9900e- 0.0835 2.8000e- 0.0307 2.3000e- 0.0309 8.1500e- 2.2000e- 8.3700e- 0.0000 i 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e- 0.0000 i 24.9558 i i i i � i
003 004 004 003 004 003 004 i
Total

0.0101

6.9900e-

0.0835

2.8000e-

0.0307

2.3000e-

0.0309

8.1500e-

2.2000e-

8.3700e-

0.0000

24.9407

6.1007

0.0000

24.9558
003
004
004
003
004
003
004

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG
I NOx
I CO
I S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated •i 1.5857 i 7.9962 i 19.1834 i 0.0821 i 7.7979 i 0.0580

7.8559
i 2.0895
i 0.0539

2.1434

0.0000 i 7,620.498 � 7,620.498 � 0.3407 i 0.0000
i 7,629.016
6 i 6 i i
i 2
Unmitigated

1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580

7.8559

2.0895

0.0539

2.1434

0.0000 7,620.498 • 7,620.498 • 0.3407 - 0.0000
• 7,629.016
6 6
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise ; 145.75 ; 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 ......................................-------------------------------- -----------------------:------------------------ Apartments Mid Rise ; 4,026.75 ; 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 ------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- ......................................-----------
General Office Building ; 288.45 ; 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 ......................................--- ----- ------------ - ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r -
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) ; 2,368.80 ; 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 .................................................. ---------- - ------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r - Ho.............�---.----192.00 1--T----------- y-------------------------- 445,703 ..

Quality Restaurant + 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 ......................................-------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------------:------------------------ Regional Shopping Center ; 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452

4.3 Trip Type Information

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose %
I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Low Rise 14.70

5.90 8.70

40.20 19.20

40.60 86
11 3
Apartments Mid Rise 14.70

5.90 8.70
Y 40.20
:
1 19.20

40.60 86
11 3
........................------------------__
__ __
?
_
T
_
--------
----
-------------
General Office Building 16.60

8.40 6.90

33.00 48.00

19.00 77
; 19
4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - -
High Turnover (Sit Down ; 16.60
- - - - - - - - -

8.40 T - - - - - - - - - .

6.90 - - - - - - - -

8.50 i' - - - - - - - - T
1 72.50
- - - - - - - - - - - -

19.00 - - - - - - - - -
37 - - - - - - - - - -
20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
43 .......:......r........�------------------
--
...
?
r--------------....

T..
-------- .r..
--------
---- r...
-------------
Hotel 16.60

8.40 6.90

19.40 61.60

19.00 ;
58 ; 38 ;
4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - -
Quality Restaurant 16.60
- - - - - - - - -

8.40 T - - - - - - - - - .

6.90 - - - - - - - -

12.00 i' - - - - - - - - T
1 69.00
- - - - - - - - - - - -

19.00 - - - - - - - - -
38 - - - - - - - - - -
18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60

8.40 6.90

16.30 64.70

19.00 54
35 11

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
I LDT1
I LDT2
I MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise

0.543088} 0.044216;

0.209971;

0.116369;

0.014033;

0.006332;

0.021166;

0.033577;

0.002613;

0.001817;

0.005285;

0.0007121

0.000821
r
Apartments Mid Rise

0.5430881 0.0442161

0.2099711

0.1163691

0.0140331

0.0063321

0.0211661

0.0335771

0.0026131

0.0018171

0.0052851

0.000712.

0.000821
r
General Office Building

0.5430881 0.0442161

0.2099711

0.1163691

0.0140331

0.0063321

0.0211661

0.0335771

0.0026131

0.0018171

0.0052851

0.000712:

0.000821
r
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;----------------+ - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down

0.5430881 0.044216:

0.209971:

0.116369:

0.014033:

0.006332:

0.021166:

0.033577:

0.002613:

0.001817:

0.005285:

0.000712:

0.000821
Restaurant)
....................... f........*-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------� _ ..... _ . -0.002613 -0.001817 -0.005285
Hotel

0.5430881 0.0442161

0.2099711

0.1163691

0.014033,

0.006332

0.021166

0.033577

0.000712

0.000821
-----------------------_-----------------------
Quality Restaurant

0.5430881 0.0442161

0.2099711

0.1163691

0.0140331

0.0063321

0.0211661

0.0335771

0.0026131

0.0018171

0.0052851

0.000712.

0.000821
Regional Shopping Center

0.543088. 0.044216'

0.209971'

0.116369'

0.014033'

0.006332'

0.021166'

0.033577'

0.002613'

0.001817'

0.005285'

0.000712'

0.000821

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
I Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity •1
I I 1
I 1 I
I I
1 I 0.0000
I I
I 0.0000 I
I
I 0.0000
� 0.0000
� 0.0000
I I
12,512.646 1 2,512.646 I 0.1037
I
1 0.0215
i 2,521.635
Mitigated
5 1 5 1
1 1 6
•1 I I 1 I 1 1
I
1 •
1 1 I
1 Electricity •1
I I I
I 1 I
I 1
1 I 0.0000
1 I
1 0.0000 I
I
I 0.0000

0.0000
� 0.0000
1 I
12,512.646 1 2,512.646 I 0.1037
I
1 0.0215
2,521.635
Unmitigated
5 1 5 1
I
1 6
•1 I I 1 I 1 1
I
1 •
I 1 1 I
1 NaturalGas

0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-

0.0966

0.0000
1,383.426 1,383.426 0.0265

0.0254
1,391.647
Miti
003
7 7
8gated
•
I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 •
1 1 I
1 NaturalGas

0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
- 0.0966

0.0966 -

0.0966

0.0000
1,383.426 - 1,383.426 - 0.0265
- 0.0254
1,391.647
Unmitigated
003
7 7
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
I Total
I
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
i 408494 42.2000e- 1 0.0188 1 8.0100e- 1 1.2000e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1 1.5200e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1.5200e- � 0.0000 1 21.7988 1 21.7988 1 4.2000e- 1 4.000Oe- i 21.9284 Rise
1 '1 003 1 1 003 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 004 1 004 1 ;
1 1
r------�I------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � - 1 1 1 1 T
Apartments Mid
i 1.30613e .1 0.0704 1 0.6018 1 0.2561 1 3.8400e- 1 1 0.0487 1 0.0487 1 1 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 1 696.9989 1 696.9989 1 0.0134 1 0.0128 i 701.1408 Rise
+007 ; 1 I I 003
_
1 ; 1
r------71------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � - 1 1 1 1 T
General Office
Building
i 468450 .1 2.5300e- 1 0.0230 1 0.0193 1 1.4000e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1 1.7500e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1.7500e- 0.0000 1 24.9983 1 24.9983 1 4.8000e- 1 4.6000e- i 25.1468 1 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 -----------1
'1-----------------------------------------------------------------------• 1------------------------1 High Turnover (Sit

8.30736e •1 0.0448 1 0.4072 1 0.3421 1 2.4400e- 1 1 0.0310 1 0.0310 1 1 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 1 443.3124 1 443.3124 1 8.5000e- 1 8.1300e- i 445.9468 Down Restaurant)
1 +006 1 1 1 003 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 003 1 003 1
-----------
Hotel
------ �'1------------------------------------------�-------�---------------� 1 �-------�-------�-------1 r71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �____--'I-------1 1 1 T____'-_

1.74095e 9.3900e- 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 1 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 1.7000e- 93.4557 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 +006 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 __
" '-" "I
Quality
1 j-------i-------i-------i-------i--------------- i------- i---------------. 1 �-------�-------�-------' r------71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �____--'I-------1 1 1 T____'-_ 1 1.84608e •1 9.9500e- 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 1.8100e- 1 99.0993 Restaurant
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 __t------71-------1
1 , I I I 1
I I I I I I I 1 - 1 I I I T_____-_
Regional
Shopping Centers
i 91840 .1 5.000Oe- 1 4.5000e- 1 3.7800e- 1 3.000Oe- 1 1 3.4000e- 1 3.4000e- 1 1 3.4000e- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1 4.9009 1 4.9009 1 9.000Oe- 1 9.000Oe- i 4.9301 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 . 1 1 005 1 005 1 Total

0.1398

1.2312

0.7770

7.6200e-

0.0966

0.0000
1,383.426
1,383.426

0.0265

0.0254
1,391.647
003
8 8
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
I Total
I
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
i 408494 42.2000e- 1 0.0188 1 8.0100e- 1 1.2000e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1 1.5200e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1.5200e- � 0.0000 1 21.7988 1 21.7988 1 4.2000e- 1 4.000Oe- i 21.9284 Rise
1 '1 003 1 1 003 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 004 1 004 1 1 ; 1
r------�I------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , - 1 1 1 1 T
Apartments Mid
i 1.30613e .1 0.0704 1 0.6018 1 0.2561 1 3.8400e- 1 1 0.0487 1 0.0487 1 1 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 1 696.9989 1 696.9989 1 0.0134 1 0.0128 i 701.1408 Rise
+007 ; 1 I I 003
_
1 ; 1
r------71------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , - 1 1 1 1 T
General Office
Building
i 468450 .1 2.5300e- 1 0.0230 1 0.0193 1 1.4000e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1 1.7500e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1.7500e- 0.0000 1 24.9983 1 24.9983 1 4.8000e- 1 4.6000e- i 25.1468 1 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 -----------1
'1-----------------------------------------------------------------------• 1------------------------1 High Turnover (Sit

8.30736e .1 0.0448 1 0.4072 1 0.3421 1 2.4400e- 1 1 0.0310 1 0.0310 1 1 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 1 443.3124 1 443.3124 1 8.5000e- 1 8.1300e- i 445.9468 Down Restaurant)
1 +006 i 1 1 1 003 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 003 1 003 1
-----------
Hotel
------ �'1------------------------------------------�-------�---------------� 1 �-------�------- -------1 r71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , �____--'I-------1 1 1 -------

1.74095e •1 9.3900e- 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 1 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 1.7000e- 93.4557 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 -""'-""i
Quality
'1 j-------i-------i-------i-------i--------------- i------- i---------------��1 �-------�-------�-------1 r-------------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , ____--'I-------1 1 1 T_----- 71 1.84608e •1 9.9500e- 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 1.8100e- 99.0993 Restaurant
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 __t------71-------1
1 , I I I 1
I I I I I I I 1 - 1 I I I T_____-_
Regional
Shopping Centers
i 91840 •1 5.000Oe- 1 4.5000e- 1 3.7800e- 1 3.000Oe- 1 1 3.4000e- 1 3.4000e- 1 1 3.4000e- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1 4.9009 1 4.9009 1 9.000Oe- 1 9.000Oe- i 4.9301 ; 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 . 1 1 005 1 005 1 Total

0.1398

1.2312

0.7770

7.6200e-

0.0966

0.0000
1,383.426
1,383.426

0.0265

0.0254
1,391.647
003
8 8
j
j
8 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Use
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
106010 •i 33.7770 i 1.3900e- 2.9000e- 33.8978
Rise
003 004 i
--�------it------
Apartments Mid
•---------------- *-------

3.94697e •i 1,257.587 i 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
Rise
+006 9 i i i 9
General Office
-j--------j-------
i 584550 •i 186.2502 i 7.6900e- 1.5900e- 186.9165
Building
003 003
High Turnover (Sit
-j- - - - - --- - - - - - -

1.58904e •1 506.3022 i 0.0209 4.3200e- 508.1135
Down Restaurant)
i +006 003
--
Hotel
-----•--------------- -ii-------
i 550308 •1 175.3399 i 7.2400e- 1.5000e- 175.9672
003 003
-
Quality
•�- - - - - --- - - - - --
------ii-------
353120 •1 112.5116 i 4.6500e- 9.6000e- 112.9141
Restaurant
;1 i 003 i 004
Regional
756000 •i 240.8778 i 9.9400e- 2.0600e- T 241.7395
Shopping Center
003 i 003
Total
2,512.646

0.1037

0.0215
2:521.635
5 6

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Mitigated
Electricity
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Use
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
106010 •i 33.7770 i 1.3900e- 2.9000e- 33.8978
Rise
003 004 i
Apartments Mid
• ----------------

1.58904e •1 506.3022 i 0.0209 4.3200e- 508.1135
Down Restaurant)
i +006 003
---r---
Hotel
------- *-------
---ii•---------------
i 550308 •1 175.3399 i 7.2400e- 1.5000e- 175.9672
003 003
---
Quality
•�- - - - - ---
r------ii------- *-------
353120 •1 112.5116 i 4.6500e- 9.6000e- 112.9141
Restaurant
;1 003 i 004
Regional
--------------
756000 •i 240.8778 i 9.9400e- 2.0600e- 241.7395
Shopping Center
003 i 003
Total
2,512.646�71037

0.0215
2,521.635
5 6

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated •i 5.1437
i 0.2950 � 10.3804 1.6700e-

0.0714
i 0.0714
i i 0.0714

0.0714

0.0000 i 220.9670 � 220.9670 i 0.0201
� 3.7400e- 1 222.5835
003
003
Unmitigated 5.1437

0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e-
- 0.0714
- 0.0714

0.0714

0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 - 0.0201

3.7400e- 222.5835
003
003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Subcategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural •i 0.4137 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Coating
%
----------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------*------- Consumer �� 4.3998 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Products
Hearth •i 0.0206 i 0.1763 0.0750 i 1.1200e- i 0.0143 i 0.0143 i 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 i 204.1166 204.1166 i 3.9100e- 3.7400e- i 205.3295 •� 003 003 003 i
.

Landscaping •i 0.3096 i 0.1187 10.3054 i 5.4000e- i 0.0572 i 0.0572 i 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 i 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 i 17.2540 i
004
Total

5.1437

0.2950

10.3804

1.6600e-

0.0714

0.0000
220.9670
220.9670

0.0201

3.7400e-
222.5835
003
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Subcategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural •i 0.4137 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
Consumer •i 4.3998 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products
Hearth •i 0.0206 i 0.1763 0.0750 i 1.1200e- 0.0143 i 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 i 204.1166 204.1166 i 3.9100e- 3.7400e- 205.3295 003 003 003 i
Landscaping •i 0.3096 i 0.1187 10.3054 i 5.4000e- i 0.0572 i 0.0572 i 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 i 16.8504 16.8504 i 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 004
Total

5.1437

0.2950

10.3804

1.6600e-

0.0714

0.0000
220.9670
220.9670

0.0201

3.7400e-
222.5835
11 003
003

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated •1 585.8052 i 3.0183 i 0.0755
i 683.7567
- - - - - - - - - - - % --------------4------------------------------- - - - - - - - Unmitigated •• 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755
683.7567

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
door Use
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low

1.62885 / •1 10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e- 12.6471
Rise

1.02688 ;i i 003
'-------- -------- -------
Apartments Mid
1 63.5252 / •1 425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
Rise

40.0485 ;
-- - - - --- - - - - - -
General Office
1 7.99802 / •i 53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e- i 61.6019
Building

4.90201 ;i i 003
-
- - - - - - ------- -j------- --------- - - - - - - -
High Turnover (Sit

10.9272 / •i 51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e- 62.8482
Down Restaurant)
i 0.697482 ;i i 003
' -------- -------
Hotel
i 1.26834 / •1 6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e- i 7.5079

0.140927 'i 003
-- - - - - --- - - - - - -
Quality

2.42827 / •i 11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e- 13.9663
Restaurant
i 0.154996 ;i i 003
----------
---------------
Regional

4.14806 / •i 27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e- 31.9490
Shopping Center

2.54236 ;i i 003
Total
585.8052
j 3.0183
j 0.0755
683.7567

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

7.2 Water by Land Use
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
door Use
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low

1.62885 / •1 10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e- 12.6471
Rise

1.02688 ;i i 003
'-------- -------- -------
Apartments Mid
1 63.5252 / •1 425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
Rise

40.0485 ;
-- - - - --- - - - - - -
General Office
1 7.99802 / •i 53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e- i 61.6019
Building

4.90201 ;i 003
--r-
----- ------- -j--------------- * - - - - - - -
High Turnover (Sit

10.9272 / •i 51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e- 62.8482
Down Restaurant)
i 0.697482 ;i i 003
' -------- -------
Hotel
i 1.26834 / •1 6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e- i 7.5079

0.140927 'i 003
-- - - - - --- - - - - - -
Quality

2.42827 / •i 11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e- 13.9663
Restaurant
i 0.154996 ;i i 003
----------
---------------
Regional

4.14806 / •i 27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e- 31.9490
Shopping Center

2.54236 ;i i 003
Total
585.8052
j 3.0183
j 0.0755
683.7567

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual CategoryNear
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated •i 207.8079
i 12.2811 i 0.0000
1 514.8354
- - - - - - - - - - - % --------------+------------------------------ - - - - - - - Unmitigated •• 207.8079

12.2811 0.0000
514.8354

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Disposed
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low

11.5 •1 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Rise
•�
i
• '-------'-------
Apartments Mid
i 448.5 •i 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 i 225.5513
Rise
•�
--------
i
-------- ------- '-------
GeneralOffice
i 41.85 •1 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 i 21.0464
Building
i •�
-
------ �i------- '------- '------- *-------
High Turnover (Sit
428.4 •1 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Down Restaurant)1
•�
• '-------'-------
Hotel
i 27.38 •1 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 i 13.7694
__
i i
Quality

7.3 •i 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Restaurant
i •�
• -------- -------

58.8 •i 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Shopping Center
i •�
Total
207.8079

12.2811

0.0000
514.8354

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Mitigated
Waste
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Disposed
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low

11.5 •1 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Rise
•�
i
• '-------'-------
Apartments Mid
i 448.5 •i 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 i 225.5513
Rise
•�
--------
i
-------- ------- '-------
GeneralOffice
i 41.85 •1 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 i 21.0464
Building
i •�
-
------ �i------- '------- '------- *-------
High Turnover (Sit
428.4 •1 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Down Restaurant)1
•�
'-------'-------
Hotel
i 27.38 •1 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 i 13.7694
__
i i
Quality

7.3 •i 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Restaurant
i •�
• - ' - - - - - - -'- - - - - - -
Regional

58.8 •i 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Shopping Center
i •�
Total
207.8079

12.2811

0.0000
514.8354

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building

45.00 +
1000sgft
; 1.03
45,000.00
i 0
----------------------------_------------------------------_ h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00
High
----------------------- - - - - -- = - - ;------- - - - - --- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0
+
-----------------------------_------------------------------_- Hotel 50.00 +
---------------------- - - - - -- = - ---;-------------- - - - - - - Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0
------ - - - --y----------------_------------------------------_- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 +
---------------------- - - - - -- = --- ----;-------------- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0
_
--- - - - - -p--------------------_------------------------------ A Apartments Low Rise 25.00 +
----------------------------- = --- ----;------------- - - - - - - Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72
---- - - - - ---------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------= Apartments
artments Mid Rise 975.00 +
----- -------- --------- -i------------------+--------------- Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 i 2789
------------------------------_------------------------------_ ----------------------- - - - - -- --------------}------------------E------------- Regional Shopping Center

56.00 1000sgft

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.