Agenda Item No. 17
CITY OF YUCAIPA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Fermin Preciado, Director of Development Services/City EngineeT— Benj amin J. Matlock, Planning Manager/City Planner X -- FOR; City Council Meeting of March 13, 2023
SUBJECT: Annual Adjustment of Development Impact Fees (Continued from January 23, 2023, City Council Meeting)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt resolution No. 2022-59, rescinding Resolution No. 2021-64, and amending Resolution No. 93-39, establishing a schedule of revised Development Impact Fees.
BACKGROUND:
The City's current Development Impact Fee (DIF) program was initially adopted in 1993 in order to provide a stable source of funding for the infrastructure improvements that would be needed to support new development, and consequently, these fees were assessed to all properties that were determined to be vacant at that time. Any properties with existing structural improvements were exempted from. the DIF program in order to ensure that there were no disincentives that could adversely affect the potential for their reuse. Each year, the fees are adjusted to ensure that future DIF revenues keep pace with inflation and other associated costs to fund the estimated construction costs in the applicable DIF categories. The process allows for the fees that are collected to fully satisfy the total amount of costs that will be incurred over the life of the program, and that the City will have the financial resources to implement the projects listed within the DIF program. The fees that are collected also represent each development project's fair share cost to the City.
As part of the notification process for the change in municipal fees, the Building Industry Association (BIA) and utility companies were notified of the public hearing date for the Development Impact Fee review by Council. To date, no comments have been received from either the utility companies or the BIA.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed DIFs are consistent with the provisions of Ordinance No. 50, which contains the City's regulations for establishing a comprehensive system of DIFs. 413
City Council Meeting of March 13, 2023
Adjustments to Development Impact Fees
Adjustments Marie to Prior Year Is DIF:
To develop the annual update to the City's DIF program, several different factors are adjusted to ensure that the DIF program reflects the most current and accurate assessment of the future project costs and to ensure that DIFs levied on new projects best represent the fair share cost burden. The updates include anticipated future project costs, with an adjustment that corresponds to the change in the Construction Cost Index (CCI), updates to the total number of dwelling units or acres that have changed for future development, and incorporation of any other future project details, such as grant funding, that has the potential to impact the overall project costs that are included in the DIF program. However, a notable change to the DIF approach has been made following the requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 602, which is further discussed below.
AB 602 and Conn r•ehensive U date:
AB 602 establishes "standards and practices" for adopting an impact fee nexus study before imposing a DIF. The various construction and improvement projects listed in the DIF program identify the City's fee's use, and our comprehensive drainage master plan, Capital Improvement Program, and the General Plan help to demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the development project. AB 602 further reinforces that the DIF calculations shall demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility or facilities funded by the fee and the development project the fee is assessed on. This element to AB 602 remains consistent with the City's DIF program, however, the law further identifies that jurisdictions must calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units of the development, unless very specific thresholds are met to establish fees on a per unit basis. For reference, the City's DIF program has historically used a `per unit' calculation, except for the calculation for ADUsI. However, this new sq ft.-based approach is meant to best provide a fair assessment of the DIFs calculated for a project (for example, it better recognizes that a 900 square foot home would have fewer overall impacts to City public facilities than a 3,500 square foot home).
The new requirements from AB 602 represents a shift in the approach for the City, as the current framework and approach to the DIF have been carried annually since the program's conception.
In discussions with other communities, those that had a per unit calculation are now also updating their DIF program to a square foot calculation and it is unclear if any jurisdiction will be able to justify/proceed with a per unit cosh Based on these new requirements and limited availability to meet the exceptions provided as part of AB 602, staff solicited proposals from qualified firms to assist in a comprehensive update to the DIF program. Further, staff sought to make improvements to the overall DIF program framework to better streamline and integrate the DIF program to the City's financial software. Following the review of proposals, DTA Financial was unanimously selected to prepare the update and the 2022-2023 DIF program, and the proposed fees now reflect the changes made through their comprehensive evaluation and AB 602 implementation. However, overall fees for a "typical" project remains close to the fees that were previously assessed as part City's prior fees, with general changes in cost that reflect the normal updates discussed below, In addition, the updated approach was reviewed and recommended at the March 7, 2023 Finance Pursuant to state law, ADUs under 750 square feet are exempt from DIFs, and those over 750 square feet were already assessed as a percentage of the size relative to a primary single family dwelling unit. 414
City Council Meeting of March 13, 2023
,Adjustments to Development Impact Fees
Committee meeting.
Construction Cost Index:
One of the primary metrics used for the annual DIF update is to adjust the various project costs by the change in the CCI to account for the changes in construction and material costs that have occurred due to inflation. The average change in CCI for the Southern California -Los Angeles region, which has served as the basis for the annual inflationary adjustment, was 5.7% over the past fiscal year, which is a significant increase for a single year, but remains less than the prior year's 8.7%. Supply limitations and material cost increases continue to drive the costs for construction projects, which subsequently impacts all the future DIF-related projects. For most of the projects listed in the DIF, the CCI is the only adjustment made to the expected project costs. However, exceptions to this single adjustment factor are provided where new information on the anticipated project cost become known, and any applicable adjustments are identified in subsequent subsections of this report.
Further, it should be noted that an inflationary increase in all applicable program expenses was also made to ensure that the cost of the facilities that have been previously built remains consistent with the inflated costs of the facilities that remain to be built in the various program calculations.
DIF Collection in 2022:
Adjustments have been made for the number of dwelling units or acres that have already been developed, as well as for the funds that have already been collected, deferred, spent, or credited to ensure that the fees that remain to be collected will equal the projected cost of the facilities that remain to be built. Factors that contributed to the varying decreases or increases in DIFs are the changes in the amount of funds collected or deferred, referred to as the `cash on hand,' in conjunction with the amount expended on projects. For the prior fiscal year, the following amounts have been collected:
Fee Type
Drainage
Anioutit
$906 817
Park
$847 363
Fire
$199 687
Circulation
$2,107,016
Public
$322,666
Total
$4 393 549
In order to fully account for all of the changes regarding the future levels of development, the number of acres and dwelling units remaining to be developed has been revised to reflect the building permits issued for 121 new dwelling units within 36 residential acres, and the net 17.3 acres of commercial development that occurred in fiscal year 2021/22.
Historically, it was assumed that the interest that was earned on the fees that were collected, but not yet spent, would offset a significant portion of the annual CCI increase. In past periods, when the CCI was relatively minor and interest rates were higher, this had sometimes been true. However, in the past decade, the interest income has been insufficient to offset the projected cost increases, and the CCI increase has been necessary to ensure the full recovery of all anticipated costs. 415
City Council Meeting of March 13, 2023
Adjustments to Development Impact Fees
Project Cost Ad
justmments:
As noted previously, the typical approach to the DIF update is to adjust project costs by the change in the CCI to correspond to how inflation will impact the anticipated project costs in the future.
However, as the City continues to develop the different infrastructure projects within the DIF program, more accurate project costs may become available, and should then be incorporated into the DIF to provide a better representation of future costs. For this current update, no substantial changes were identified that needed to be incorporated into this year's DIF program.
AnticipatedNew Development Build -Out Ad
iust»zent:
The DIF program is designed to take the total construction costs to implement the DIF projects, subtract the share reflecting the financial obligation to existing residents, and then divide the remaining cost by the total buildout that is projected for the City to create the individual costs. As these development projects that have the potential to impact the total projected build -out for the City occur, these adjustments are then incorporated in the DIF assessment. The proposed DIF program provides for the build out calculations from the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (FCSP) update previously reviewed by Council, as well the projected residential units listed in the City's adopted and certified Housing Element. Another future adjustment that may occur is based on the future implementation of the American Viticulture Area (AVA) within the City, which may have the potential to modify the projected total commercial development currently assumed in the community.
Grant Funding Adjustments:
There are a number of grant funding opportunities from federal, state, and local sources that have been approved as part of grants for traffic and drainage -related projects (see attached spreadsheet), and staff believes that it is appropriate to include a portion of this anticipated revenue in the Traffic Facilities Fee (TFF) and Drainage Facilities Fee (DFF) calculations. The actual amount of potential grant revenue that staff is proposing to include in the TFF calculations is discounted by a "likelihood -of -obtaining" factor to reflect the possibility of not obtaining allocated grant funding, or that the overall Measure I program costs for transportation projects increase to the point that future projects are not funded. Staffs recommendation, however, includes only those funding sources that staff has assessed as having a relatively high probability of being realized in the near term, and even then, only a portion of the anticipated revenue may be counted in the calculations.
For grant funding that has already been received by the City for certain projects, 100% of those grant funds are discounted in the calculation. Staff believes that this conservative approach will ensure that the DIF program remains on a sound financial basis and that staff will only be counting revenue that has been received or is very likely to receive, Currently, these proposed revenue sources for transportation projects include 100% of the Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TRCP) grant that has funded part of the Oak Glen Road/Live Oak Canyon Road interchange project, 100% of the Measure I reimbursement for the interchange and arterial projects, and 60% to 100% of several state and federal grants that the City has been previously awarded for the Yucaipa Boulevard and County Line Road projects. While there may 416
City Council Meeting of March 13, 2023
Adjustments to Development Impact Fees
be a significant amount of additional funds available from Measure I for Major Arterials, no guarantees can be made at this time, particularly for "out years." Consequently, these revenues over the next several years are being progressively discounted for all projected revenues beyond five years. By including a reasonable portion of the grant revenue that is potentially available, the cost to the TFF has been reduced significantly. If the anticipated revenues do not materialize as expected, or they exceed current projections, adjustments will continue to be made to the TFF account during subsequent annual reviews of the DIF program. The same approach is also provided for the drainage -related grant funding opportunities, which offsets the existing development obligations to the program. It should be noted that the City's efforts and commitment to obtaining grant funding for projects help to alleviate the cost of infrastructure from existing and new development. In total, the City has received $154,232,470 from state and federal grants, Measure 1, agency partnerships, and related opportunities as shown in the Capital Improvement Program Funding Sources exhibit attached to this report.
2023 DIF Schedule:
The recommended adjustments, identified above, create a net effect of amending each category that comprises the DIF schedule. The change in DIF amounts between the previous year and the proposed fees are summarized in the DIF comparison table below. Additionally, these calculations account for the 'per square foot' following AB 602, which did not typically apply to certain fund categories.
DIF Comparison 2022 to 2023
2022 DIF 2023 2022 DIF 2023 DIF 2022DIF
ProposedDIF Existing Proposed Existing
Proposed
Program
Residential Residential Commercial Commercial Industrial Industrial
(per f p'
(per acre)
Drainage
3415.85 3163.83 14,879.46 15,226,94 14,879.46
15,226.94
Traffic
10 434.20
8,938.09
56,344.67
56,798.02
63,403.72
64,823,82
Public
Facilities
1,444.62
1,897,44
7,800.93
11,649.73
7,800.93
8,737.30
Fire
916.21
1,119.21
8,708.21
687164
8.708.21
$5,153.73
Park
2.998,78
2,738.99
NIA
NIA
NIA
N!A
Totals
19,209.66
17 857.56
87,733.27
90,546.33
94 792.32
1 93 941.80
% +/-
-7.04%
4.06%
-.15%
Notes' Residential fees assume a 2,000 sq ft single-family residence on a 10,000 square foot lot, and commercial and Industrial fees assume a 15,000 square foot building on an acre lot consistent with the 2022 fee schedule —the comparison shown in the report has been amended to 2,260 square feet and 16,335 square feet, respectively, for the 2023 fees to align with the average recorded as part of the permits issued and the demographic data of the DIF calculations.
The updated fees represent relatively modest changes from the 2022 schedule, with the key changes made through the construction cost increases and the updated calculation protocols which now scale according to the site of the building that is to be constructed. However, since the impact fee is now based on square footage rather than a per unit basis for new homes, additions that are made to homes constructed following this new formula will be subject to impact fees, and that detail is included in the fee resolution.
While the DIF schedules for other cities is not a determining factor for what a city should charge for their fees, it does provide a frame of reference to ensure that one city's program remains competitive 417
City Council Meeting of March 13, 2023
Adjustments to Development Impact Fees
and comparable to the region. In comparison with neighboring cities' DIF amounts, the City -specific fees for residential development are in the bottom one-third of the other nearby cities surveyed. In addition, the City's commercial/industrial DIF amounts are still much lower than most of the other cities (second lowest). As noted in prior Council discussions, the combination of outside agency fees (school district, water and sewer fees) unfortunately pushes the, overall residential development cost in Yucaipa to be one of the more expensive in the region. However, the City's fees for commercial and industrial projects remain one of the lowest. The comparison is provided below for Council's reference of the surrounding Cities' 2021 fees, which included an additional calculation of the CCI increase for 2021 related to the rising cost of construction that impacted each jurisdiction. However, the cities surveyed have not yet completed a more current update, and similar to Yucaipa, are undergoing a more comprehensive update to ensure compliance with AB 602, and as such, have not been adjusted in the -table below. Once those updates have been completed, the City will update the comparison.
DEVELOPMENT FEE COMPARISON 20212
RESIDENTIAL BASED ON 2000 SQ FT HOME ON 10,000 Square Foot lot (.23 acres)
With assumed
BLDG. TOTAL CITY 8.7% CCI
CITY TOTAL DIF PERMIT FEE Increase
H.
$17,064.96
$3,900
$20,964,96
$22,788.91
F.
$7,730.52
$6,600
$14,330,52
$15,577.28
0. $23,325.00
$3,600
$26,926.00
$29,267.48
G.
$15,726.92
$3,234
$18,960.67
$20,610.25
B.
$17,357.53
$2,750
$20,107.53
$21,856.89
E,
$32,930.08
$4,500
$37,430.08
$40,686.50
YUCAIPA
$17,857.56
$3,789
$21,646.56
$21,646.56
C.
$18,869.00
$6,420
$25,289.00
$27,489.14
DEVELOPMENT FEE COMPARISON 2021'
COMMERCIAL BASED ON 15,000 SQ. FT. ON 1 ACRE
With assumed
BLDG. TOTAL CITY 8.7% CCI
CITY TOTAL. DIF PERMIT FEE Increase
YUCAIPA
$90,546
$17,961
$108,507
$108,507
B.
$145,274
$19,000
$164,274
$178,566
F.
$54,867
$13,000
$67,867
$73,771
D,
$188,630
$11,300
$199,930
$217,324
G.
$159,749
$16,558
$176,307
$191,645
H.
$166,721
$8,500
$175,221
$190,465
C.
$115,740
$23,008
$138,748
$150,819
E.
$195,270
$15,004
$210,274
$228,568
2 Yucaipa's fees are for the current 2023 year; other cities are completing required updates and information on their new fees is not yet available.
418
City Council Meeting of March 13, 2023
Adjustments to Development Impact Fees
FISCAL IMPACT:
With all of the adjustments noted above, the revised DIFs will generate $240,495,617 in total revenue over the remaining thirty (30) year life of the DIF program. When combined with the $330,516 in deferrals that have been executed, the $97,406,166 in TFF grants (including current and fixture Measure I revenues), the $ $46,743,414 in DFF grants, and some additional park grants that are considered likely to be received, there will be sufficient funds to complete all of the capital facilities that are included on the DIF Worksheets that are attached to Resolution No. 2022-59 as Exhibit "A" Attachments: Resolution No. 2022-59
DIF Calculations and Report
Current and Potential Drainage Grants
Current and Potential Transportation Grants
Capital Improvement Program Project Funding Sources
Worksheets for Current (2021) DIF
Approved by:
419
RESOLUTION NO, 2022-59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2021-64, AND
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO.93-39, ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF
REVISED DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Section 1. Findings, Authority and Purpose.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Yucaipa (the "City Council") has adopted Ordinance No. 50, which establishes a requirement for the payment of development impact fees by new development within the City of Yucaipa (the "City") to ensure that certain public facilities or capital improvements are constructed and made available concurrent with the need caused by new development; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 50 provides that the City Council shall, by resolution, adopt a schedule setting forth the specific amount of development impact fees which will be levied upon new development in the City; describe the benefit and impact area on which the development impact fees are imposed; list the public improvements to be financed; describe the estimated cost of facilities which form the basis for the development impact fee; describe the reasonable relationship between the development impact fee and the various types of new development; and set forth the time for payment of the development impact fee; and
WHEREAS, the Development Impact Fee Study prepared by Kadie-Jensen, Johnson & Bodnar, and adopted by Ordinance No. 50, describes the benefit and impact area on which the development impact fees are to be imposed, describes the reasonable relationship between the development impact fee and the various types of new development, analyzes the need for new public facilities and improvements which will be necessitated by future development, sets forth a methodology for determining the relationship between new development, the needed facilities, and the estimated cost of those improvements, and otherwise satisfies the requirements of the law with regard to the imposition and collection of development impact fees; and WHEREAS, Wilbur Smith Associates, professional traffic engineers, prepared a Citywide Traffic Analysis and Mitigation Study, dated April 1993 (the "Citywide Traffic Analysis and Mitigation Study"), and Boyle Engineering, professional civil engineers, prepared a Master Plan of Drainage, dated November 1993 (the "Master Storm Drain Plan"), and the City Fire Chief prepared a Capital Improvements Projection for fire facilities, dated September 2003, the City prepared a revised Public Facilities Plan, dated July 1993 (the "Capital Improvements Projections"), and Robert Bein, William Frost Associates, professional civil engineers, prepared a Drainage & Traffic Impact Fee Assessment Update and Evaluation, dated August 2011 (the "Impact Fee Assessment Update"), which revise and update specific public improvements to be financed through the imposition and collection of the development impact fee and the cost of providing those improvements; and
WHEREAS, all such tables which incorporate the revised facilities plans according to the methodology established by Ordinance No. 50 are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated fully herein by reference; and
420
Resolution No. 2022-59
WHEREAS, the facilities and improvement costs analysis of the Citywide Traffic Analysis and Mitigation Study, the Master Storm Drain Plan, the Capital Improvements Projections, and the Impact Fee Assessment Update, taken together with the methodology established by Ordinance No. 50, demonstrate the specific costs associated with providing adequate public facilities commensurate with projected levels of new development; and WHEREAS, except for projects involving developer reimbursements or credits, the City will determine and provide for sources of additional funds that are attributed to existing residents prior to the construction of any facility for which existing residents have been allocated a share of the cost; and such sources of funding may include, but not be limited to, contributions from the Yucaipa Redevelopment Agency or the City, grants, bonds, and assessment districts or other special tax levies; and
WHEREAS, this City Council desires to assess a proportionate share of the costs for recreational facilities to all new residential developments in order to ensure that all property owners contribute equally towards the mitigation of their impacts by the imposition of an equivalent fee on projects; and
WHEREAS, the Community Services Department of the City of Yucaipa prepared a Capital Improvements Projection, dated October 2005, which demonstrates the specific costs associated with providing adequate recreational facilities commensurate with the projected levels of new development; and
WHEREAS, the City of Yucaipa adopted an update to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan dated October 2016, which demonstrates the recreational facilities commensurate with the projected levels of new development; and
WHEREAS, WLCIGrifFin Structures, Inc, prepared a Final Report: Yucaipa Police and Public Library Needs Assessment and Conceptual Site Analysis, dated May 2010, which demonstrates the specific costs associated with providing adequate police administrative facilities and library facilities commensurate with the projected levels of new development; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the 2016 General Plan Update in April 2016; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 50 provides that the amount of each fee may be revised periodically by resolution of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, an update (Nexus Study) has been prepared by DTA that provides for updated fee calculations that are in compliance with the requirements of Assembly Bill 602; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to rescind Resolution No. 2021-64 and adopt the updated schedule of Development Impact Fees; and
421
Resolution No. 2022-59
WHEREAS, the "Engineering News Record" Construction Cost Index for the Los Angeles region indicates that construction costs have increased 5.7% since the adoption of the current development impact fees; and
WHEREAS, there are additional information that is provided that may adjust the anticipated costs for future construction projects, and any necessary adjustments shall be made to accommodate these cost adjustment; and
WHEREAS, the development impact fees currently in place must be increased to provide for the construction cost increases identified above; and WHEREAS, there are additional sources of designated or grant funds presently pending for Traffic Facilities Fee improvements, and because it is not possible to determine the total amount of these funds that are likely to be received by the City each year, or over the course of the General Plan build -out, the adjustment that is made for designated or grant funding shall be evaluated each year to determine if it should be increased or decreased based on changes in expected allocations for the future.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA DUES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 2. Resolution No. 2021-64 is hereby rescinded.
Section 3. Section 4 of Resolution No. 93-39 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Traffic Facilities Fees (TFF) for residential, commercial and industrial development are hereby determined to be:
(1) $4.47 per square foot for residential development and Accessory Dwelling Units 750 square feet or greater; and
(2) $3,787 per thousand square feet for commercial development; and (3) $4,322 per thousand square feet for industrial development.
Section 4. Section 5 of Resolution No. 93-39 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Drainage Facilities Fees (DFF) for residential, commercial and industrial development are hereby determined to be:
(1) $1.58 per square foot for residential development and Accessory Dwelling Units 750 square feet or greater; and
(2) $15,227 per acre for commercial development; and
422
Resolution No. 2022-59
(3) $15,227 per acre for industrial development.
Section 5. Section 7 of Resolution No. 93-39 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Public Facilities Fees (PFF) for residential, commercial and industrial development are hereby determined to be:
(1) $0.95 per square foot for residential development and Accessory Dwelling Units 750 square feet or greater; and
(2) $777 per thousand square feet for commercial development; and (3) $582 per thousand square feet for industrial development.
Section 6. Section 7 of Resolution No. 93-39 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Fire Facilities Fees (FFF) for residential, commercial and industrial development are hereby determined to be:
(1) $0.56 per square foot for residential development and Accessory Dwelling Units 750 square feet or greater; and
(2) $458 per thousand square feet for commercial development; and (3) $344 per thousand square feet for industrial development.
Section 7. Section 8 of Resolution No. 93-39 is hereby amended to read as follows:
the Park Facilities Fee (PKF) for residential development that is not subject to the provisions of Ordinance No. 33 is hereby determined to be:
(1) $1.37 per square foot for residential development and Accessory Dwelling Units 750 square feet or greater.
Section 8. Any additions constructed after the adoption of this resolution shall be subject to the fees listed above.
Section 9. The fees specified in this resolution shall be used solely for those facilities and improvements necessitated by new development or otherwise as required or authorized by law, and shall become effective sixty (60) days after the effective date of the adoption of this resolution.
423
Resolution No. 2022-59
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on March 13, 2023
ATTEST:
Kimberly Metzler, City Clerk
Justin Beaver, Mayor
424
1■■II
www.FinanceDTA.com
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
JUSTIFICATION STUDY
CITY OF YUCAIPA
Report Date: March 9, 2023
Public-Privat(
Developme
Clean
ta
100 Bayview Circle, Suite 100
www.FinanceDTA.com New Beach, CA 92660
CITY OF YUCAIPA
CITY OF
r
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE
Prepared for:
City of Yucaipa
34272 Yucaipa Boulevard
Yucaipa, CA 92399
Attention: Benjamin Matlock
426
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................1 A
Organization of the Fee Study.........................................1 B
Summary of Impact Fees..................................................2 C
Impact of Assembly Bill CAB") 602 on Fee Levels ....... 2 D
Level of Service Factor ....................................................... 3 E
Residential Fee per Sq. Ft .................................................. 3 F
Annual Escalation Factors ................................................ 3 GExemptions
...........................................................................3 II
INTRODUCTION.............................................................. 4 III
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES ...................................... 5 IV
DEMOGRAPHICS...........................................................10 A
Existing Residential Land Uses......................................12 B
Existing Non -Residential Land Uses .............................12 C
Future Residential Land Uses (2042) ............................13 D
Future Non -Residential Land Uses (2042) ..................14 E
Summary of Existing and Future Non -Residential
Land Uses (2042)..............................................................14 V
METHODOLOGY USED TO CALCULATE FEES ........15
A
Standards -Based Fee Methodology..............................15 B
Plan -Based Fee Methodology........................................15 C
Capacity -Based Fee Methodology................................15 D
Summary of Fee Methodology.......................................16 E
Allocation of Benefit........................................................17 VI
CALCULATION OF FEES .............................................. 20 A
Public Facilities..................................................................20 BFire
.......................................................................................25 CParks
Fees...........................................................................30 DTraffic
..................................................................................35 E
Storm Drainage Fees........................................................42 VII
SUMMARY OF FEES.......................................................47 427
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A FEE DERIVATION WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX B INVENTORY AND FACILITIES NEEDS LIST
428
SECTION I
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In order to adequately plan for new development and identify the public facilities and costs associated with mitigating the direct and cumulative impacts of new development, DTA was retained by the City of Yucaipa, CA (the "City"), to update the existing impact fee program by preparing a new Assembly Bill ("AB") 1600 fee justification study (the "Fee Study"). The categories of Development Impact Fees ("DIFs" or "Fees") to be determined by this Fee Study include Public Facilities, Fire, Parks, Traffic, and Storm Drainage, at levels identified by the various City departments as being necessary to meet the needs of new development through 2042. The purpose of this Fee Study will be to establish a nexus between the anticipated development and public facilities needs for the City through 2042.
This Fee Study is intended to comply with Section 66000 etseq of the Government Code, which was enacted by the State of California in 1987, by identifying additional public facilities required by new development ("Future Facilities") and determining the level of fees that may be imposed to pay the costs of the Future Facilities. The Future Facilities are either based on a list of required facilities needed to serve new development (the "Needs List") or the needed enhancements to existing facilities (the "Facilities Inventory") to accommodate new development whilst maintaining the existing level of service ("LOS") currently provided to residents and employees in the City. A description of the methodology used to calculate the fees is included in Section V.
A Organization of the Fee Study
This Fee Study will be presented in the following seven sections:
■ Section I contains an Executive Summary and provides a brief introduction to the Fee Study and includes an overview of the proposed DIFs. ■ Section II is an Introduction that includes a brief description of City surroundings and background information on DIF funding.
■ Section III provides an overview of the legal requirements for implementing and imposing the DIF amounts identified in the Fee Study and satisfies the nexus requirements for each facility included as part of this Fee Study. Included is a discussion of the findings and requirements necessary to be satisfied when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of new development. ■ Section IV includes a discussion of land use characteristics and demand variables of projected new development such as the number of housing units and the number of non-residential building square feet, assuming current growth trends in residential and non-residential development projected through 2042. ■ Section V contains a description of the methodology used to determine the Fees for Future Facilities and presents the fees for each of the land use types. ■ Section VI presents the calculation of the Fees for each land use.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
429
March 9, 2023
/ 1
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
■ Section VII presents a summary of the Fees.
SECTION I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Fee Study also includes an appendix section presenting the calculations and other relevant material used to determine the findings presented in this Fee Study, as noted below:
■ Appendix A includes the calculations used to determine the various Fee levels; ■ Appendix B includes the Facilities Inventory or Needs List used to determine the various Fee levels; and
B Summary of Impact Fees
The total Fee amounts required to finance new residential and non-residential development's share of the costs of Future Facilities are summarized in Table ES-1 below.
Fees within this Fee Study reflect the maximum fee levels that may be imposed on new residential and non-residential development.
Table ES-1: Development Impact Fee Summary
Land Use 12
Public Facilities Fire Parks Traffic
Residential (Per Sq. Ft.)
Non -Residential (Per 1,000Sq. Ft.)
Drainage
Residential (Per Sq.
Non -Residential (PerAcre)
Residential
,
Non -Residential
�14M
Notes:
1. Residential fees are per square foot.
2. ADUs larger than 750 Sq. Ft. are charged a proportional fee amount to the primary dwelling unit.
3. Commercial and Industrial Public Facilities, Fire and Traffic fees are "per 1,000 square feet".
4. Commercial and Industrial drainage fees are "per acre".
C Impact of Assembly Bill ("AB") 602 on Fee Levels
The impact fees listed above were circumscribed by the requirements of AB 602, which was approved by the California State Legislature and signed by Governor Newsom in 2021. Among the significant impacts of AB 602 are the following:
■ On or after January 1, 2022, fee justification studies must identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS, and (if proposed new LOS is greater than existing LOS) include an explanation of why the new LOS is necessary.
■ For housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, must calculate the amount of fees based on square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate.
City of Yucaipa March 9, 2023
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
430 2
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
D Level of Service Factor
SECTION I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The LOS has been addressed for each Fee category, details of which may be found in Section VI of the Fee Study.
E Residential Fee per Sq. Ft.
DTA's methodology calculated residential Fees first on a per dwelling unit basis, and then applied the weighted average square footage for residential units, to determine the Fee per square foot. The weighted average square footage per unit was derived from data provided by the City on dwelling units developed within the City between 2017 and 2022.
Based on this data, DTA determined that the residential dwelling units (single family and multi -family) were an average size of 2,260 square feet.
F Annual Escalation Factors
The cost estimates for Future Facilities used in this Fee Study are stated in 2022 dollars.
DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed each year and adjusted based upon the changes in the Engineering News -Record ("ENR") Construction Cost Index. This construction cost index is based upon the Building Cost Index ("BCI") cost averages experienced in the City of Los Angeles as produced by Engineering News -Record.
G Exemptions
The California Government Code permits fee exemptions for affordable housing and other product types at the discretion of local jurisdictions. Such fee exemptions are a policy matter that should be based on the consideration of the greater public good provided by this specific use being exempted from the Fees.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
431
March 9, 2023
/ 3
SECTION II
taINTRODUCTION
www.FinanceDTA.com
II INTRODUCTION
Incorporated in 1989, the City of Yucaipa ("the City') is located in San Bernardino County and is 10 miles to the east of the City of San Bernardino and 72 miles east of Los Angeles. The City has a total area of 27.8 square miles and is home to a population of approximately 55,000 people. To adequately plan for new development and identify the public facilities and costs associated with mitigating the direct and cumulative impacts of new development, DTA was retained by the City to update the existing impact fee program by preparing a new AB 1600 fee justification study (the "Fee Study"). The categories of development impact fees ("DIFs" or "Fees") to be updated by this Fee Study include Public Facilities, Fire, Parks, Traffic, and Drainage, at levels identified by the various City departments as being necessary to meet the needs of new development through 2042. The purpose of this Fee Study will be to establish a nexus between the anticipated development and public facilities needs for the City through 2042, and ensure that all new development is required to pay its "fair share" of the cost of these public facilities needs through the DIF program. This Fee Study is intended to comply with Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code, which was enacted by the State of California in 1987, by identifying additional public facilities required by new development ("Future Facilities") and determining the level of fees that may be imposed to pay the costs of the Future Facilities. The Future Facilities are either based on a list of required facilities needed to serve new development (the "Needs List") or the needed enhancements to existing facilities (the "Facilities Inventory') to accommodate new development whilst maintaining the existing level of service ("LOS") currently provided to residents and employees in the City.
A description of the methodology used to calculate the fees is included in Section V.
Fees are calculated to fund the cost of facilities needed to meet the needs of new development. Many of the calculations and totals presented in this Study are factored out to several decimal places and may not sum due to rounding in the tables presented.
In the interest of clarity, they will be noted with footnotes where necessary. The steps followed in the Fee Study include:
1. Demographic Assumptions: Identify future growth that represents the increased demand for Future Facilities;
2. Facility Needs and Costs: Identify current facilities inventory to determine Level of Service ("LOS") requirements and determine the Future Facilities required to support new development and the costs of such facilities;
3. Cost Allocation: Allocate costs of Future Facilities on a per -equivalent -dwelling -unit or equivalent -benefit -unit basis; and
4. Fee Schedule: Calculate the Fee amount per square foot for residential development and per 1,000 square feet or per acre, for non-residential development.
City of Yucaipa March 9, 2023
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
432 4
SECTION III
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
III LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES The levy of impact fees is one authorized method of financing the public facilities necessary to mitigate the impacts of new development. A fee is "a monetary exaction, other than a tax or special assessment, which is charged by a local agency to the applicant in connection with approval of a development project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the development project..." (California Government Code, Section 66000).
A fee may be levied for each type of capital improvement required for new development, with the payment of the fee typically occurring prior to the beginning of construction of a dwelling unit or non-residential building. Fees are often levied at final map recordation, upon the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, or more commonly, at building permit issuance.
AB 1600, which created Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code, was enacted by the State of California in 1987.
In 2006, Government Code Section 66001 was amended to clarify that a fee cannot include costs attributable to existing deficiencies, but it can fund costs used to maintain the existing LOS or meet an adopted LOS consistent with the General Plan.
Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code thus requires that all public agencies satisfy the following requirements when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of new development:
1. Identify the purpose of the fee. [Government Code Section 66001(a)(1)]
2. Ascertain the use to which the fee will be put. [Government Code Section 66001(a)(2)]
3. Determine that there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and type of development on which the fee is to be imposed. [Government Code Section 66001(a)(3)]
4. Establish how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and type of development project on which the fee is to be imposed. [Government Code Section 66001(a)(4)]
5. Discuss how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
This section presents each of these items as they relate to the imposition of the proposed fees in the City.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
433
March 9, 2023
/S
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
SECTION III
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
A Purpose of the Fee [Government Code Section 66001(A)(1)] New residential and non-residential development within the City will generate additional residents and employees who will require additional public facilities. Land for these facilities will have to be acquired and public facilities and equipment will have to be expanded, constructed, or purchased to meet this increased demand.
The Fee Study has been prepared in response to the projected direct and cumulative effects of future development. Each new development will contribute to the need for new public facilities. Without future development, many of the new public facilities on the Needs List would not be necessary as the existing facilities are generally adequate for the City's present population. In instances where facilities would be built regardless of new development, the costs of such facilities have been allocated to new and existing development based on their respective level of benefit.
The proposed impact fee will be charged to all future development, irrespective of location, in the City. First, the property owners and/or the tenants associated with any new development in the City can be expected to place additional demands on the City's facilities funded by the fee. Second, these property owners and tenants are dependent on and, in fact, may not have chosen to utilize their development, except for residential, retail, employment, and recreational opportunities located nearby on other existing and future development.
As a result, all development projects in the City contribute to the cumulative impacts of development.
The impact fees will be used for the acquisition, installation, and construction of public facilities identified on the Needs Lists to mitigate the direct and cumulative impacts of new development in the City.
B The Use to Which the Fee is to Be Put [Government Code Section 66001(A)(2)] The fee will be used for the acquisition, installation, and construction of the public facilities identified on the Needs Lists, included in appendix section of the Fee Study, and other appropriate costs to mitigate the direct and cumulative impacts of new development in the City. The fee will provide a source of revenue to the City to allow for the acquisition, installation, and construction of public facilities, which in turn will both preserve the quality of life in the City and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the existing and future residents and employees.
The discussion presented in this section of the Fee Study identifies the use to which the fee is to be put as required by Section 66001(a)(2) of the California Government Code.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
434
March 9, 2023
/ 6
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
SECTION III
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
C Determine That There is a Reasonable Relationship Between the Fee's Use and Type of Development Project Upon Which the Fee is Imposed (Benefit Relationship) [Government Code Section 66001(A)(3)]
As discussed in Section A above, it is the projected direct and cumulative effects of future development that have prompted the preparation of the Fee Study. Each development will contribute to the need for new public facilities. Without future development, the City would have no need to construct many of the public facilities on the Needs List. For all other facilities, the costs have been allocated to both existing and new development based on their level of benefit. Consequently, all new development within the City, irrespective of location, contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of development on public facilities and creates the need for new facilities to accommodate growth.
The fees will be expended for the acquisition, installation, and construction of the public facilities identified on the Needs List and other authorized uses, as that is the purpose for which the fees are collected. As previously stated, all new development creates either a direct impact on public facilities or contributes to the cumulative impact on public facilities. Moreover, this impact is generally equalized among all types of development because the increased demands for public facilities from the future residents and employees create the impact upon existing facilities.
For the aforementioned reasons, new development benefits from the acquisition, construction, and installation of the facilities on the Needs Lists.
D Determine How There is a Reasonable Relationship Between the Need for the Public Facility and Type of Development Project Upon Which the Fee is Imposed (Impact Relationship) [Government Code Section 66001(A)(4)] As previously stated, all new development within the City, irrespective of location, contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of development on public facilities and creates the need for new facilities to accommodate growth. Without future development, many of the facilities on the Needs Lists would not be necessary. For certain other facilities, the costs have been allocated to both existing and new development based on their level of benefit.
For the reasons presented herein, there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities included on the Needs List and all new development within the City.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
435
March 9, 2023
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
SECTION III
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
E The Relationship Between The Amount of the Fee and Cost of the Public Facilities Attributable to the Development Upon Which the Fee is Imposed ("Rough Proportionality" Relationship) [Government Code 66001(A)] As set forth above, all new development in the City impacts public facilities. Moreover, each individual development project and its related increase in population and/or employment, along with the cumulative impacts of all development in the City, will adversely impact existing facilities. Thus, the imposition of the fee to finance the facilities on the Needs Lists is an efficient, practical, and equitable method of permitting development to proceed in a responsible manner.
New development impacts facilities directly and cumulatively. In fact, without any future development, the acquisition, construction, and/or installation of many of the facilities on the Needs Lists would not be necessary as existing City facilities are generally adequate. Even new development located adjacent to existing facilities will utilize and benefit from facilities on the Needs List. The proposed fee amounts are roughly proportional to the impacts resulting from new development based on the analyses contained in Section VI. Thus, there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and cost of the facilities.
F RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
In September 2021, the Governor of California signed Assembly Bill ("AB") 602 which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. As stated earlier, the Mitigation Fee Act, AB 1600, establishes specific requirements that local officials must follow in establishing, increasing, or imposing development fees. Specifically, local officials must conduct a "nexus study" to demonstrate a "reasonable relationship" between the fees and public facilities funded by the fees, and the development project on which the fees are assessed. AB 602 is designed to provide additional guidance on how local agencies comply with their impact fee obligations, which will affect the methodology choice that DTA will use to calculate the fees. Keys portions of the bill affecting future DIF calculations are summarized below. ■ On or after January 1, 2022, fee justification studies must identify the existing Level of Service (LOS) for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS, and (if proposed new LOS is greater than existing LOS) include an explanation of why the new LOS is necessary.
■ For housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, must calculate the amount of fees based on square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate. The bill would require that a "local agency that calculated fees proportionally to the square footage of the proposed units be deemed to have used a valid method to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by development." This would also apply to multi -family residences.
City of Yucaipa March 9, 2023
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
436 8
SECTION III
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
The bill also requires the Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD"), on or before January 1, 2024, to create an impact fee nexus study template that may be used by local jurisdictions to calculate their fees. The bill would require that the template include a method of calculating the feasibility of housing being built with a given fee level. The template must be completed by 2024, and local jurisdictions will have the option (it will not be required) to use the HCD template.
■ The bill authorizes any member of the public, including an applicant for a development project, to submit evidence that the city, county, or other local agency had failed to comply with the Mitigation Fee Act. The bill requires the legislative body of the city, county, or other local agency to consider any timely submitted evidence and authorize the legislative body to change or adjust the proposed fee or fee increase, as specified.
If a nexus study supports the increase of an existing fee, the local agency shall review the assumption of the nexus study supporting the original fee and evaluate the amount of the fees collected under the original fee. ■ Large jurisdictions (county population greater than 250,000) and cities within those counties must adopt a capital improvement plan as part of the nexus study. ■ Nexus studies shall be updated at least every 8 years from the period beginning January 1, 2022.
Importantly, AB 602 does not apply to water and sewer connection and capacity charges, school fees, and Mello -Roos or other taxes. These other fees, taxes, and charges are subject to their own statutory accountability measures.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
437
March 9, 2023
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
IV DEMOGRAPHICS
SECTION IV
DEMOGRAPHICS
To determine the facilities needed to serve new development and establish fee amounts to fund such facilities, DTA has researched and reviewed material containing information of future land use development within the City through 2042. For the purpose of this Fee Study, DTA categorized developable residential land uses to include single-family, multi -family and mobile homes. Developable non-residential land uses within the City's non-residential zones are categorized as commercial and industrial and are summarized in detail in the subsequent sections.
Information from the City's 2021 Housing Element, the 2016 General Plan, the California Department of Finance, US Census, and total square footage generated by the CoStar Real Estate Manager software platform ("CoStar"), were used as estimates for the number of housing units and non-residential building square feet within the City. The City's land use decisions will also affect properties within its Sphere of Influence ("SOII. California law requires that a General Plan "cover the territory within the boundaries of an adopted City... as well as any land outside its boundaries which in the planning agencies judgement bears relation to its planning."
In addition, information from the 2016 General Plan and estimates produced by DTA were used to project the additional land uses resulting from new development. Notably, DTA attempted to utilize metrics (e.g., average household size) that standardized existing demographics with the projections used in this Fee Study.
Future residents and employees will create additional demand for facilities that existing public facilities cannot adequately service. In order to accommodate new development in an orderly manner, while maintaining the current quality of life in the City, the facilities on the Inventory and Facility Needs List (presented throughout Section VI and in the Appendix), as reviewed and approved by the City staff, will need to be constructed.
For those facilities that are needed to mitigate demand from new development, facility costs have been allocated to new development only. In those instances when it has been determined that the new facilities will serve both existing and new development, facility costs have been allocated based on proportionate benefit [see the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (" EDUI discussion in Section V].
In addition, DTA has determined that utilizing a Persons Served population, comprised of all residents and 50% of employees is common practice in quantifying the impact of a new development in a given service area and this metric will be used in both residential population and non-residential employee calculations throughout this Fee Study.
Table 1 presented below provides a summary of the land uses covered in this Fee Study.
The Fee Study will determine Fees for three (3) specific land use categories; Residential Commercial, and Industrial. Notably, the table shown below is meant to provide an example of typical land uses found in each category and is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all the City's potential land uses.
City of Yucaipa March 9, 2023
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
438 10
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 1: Summary of Land Use Categories
SECTION IV
DEMOGRAPHICS
Use
Classification Fee
StudyLand
Definition
Single -Family Detached: Includes single-family detached homes and mobile home dwellings.
Single-FamilyAttached: Includes single-family attached homes, including row houses, duplexes, quadruplexes, and townhouses. In order for attached units to be classified as single-family structures, each unit must:
■ Must be separated by a ground -to -roof wall;
■ Have a separate heating system;
Residential
• Have individual meters for public utilities; and
■ Have no units located above or below.
Multi -Family. Includes buildings with Attached residential units, including apartments, and all other non -Mobile home units not classified as Detached Dwellings and not meeting the criteria for Single -Family Attached.
ADUs >750 Sq. Ft': For the purposes of determining the impact fees due, any "second unit" or "accessory dwelling unit" (as determined pursuant to Section 65852.2 of the Government Code) shall be considered a separate residential unit and may be subject to this fee in accordance with state law.
Includes buildings used as the following:
■ Retail;
■ Service -oriented business activities, wineries/vineyards, and car washes; ■ Department stores, discount stores, furniture/appliance outlets, and home improvement centers;
Commercial
■ Entertainment centers;
■ Subregional and regional shopping centers;
• Grocery stores and storage facilities;
■ Hotels, motels, spas, and resorts;
■ Business/professional offices; and
■ General office buildings.
Includes buildings used as the following:
■ Light manufacturing, warehouse/distribution, and logistics wholesaling; Industrial
• Wholesale and warehouse retail;
■ Fulfillment Center;
■ Industrial Park; and
■ Light industrial.
Note:
1. For purposes of determining the impact fees due, any "second unit" or "accessory dwelling unit" larger than 750 square feet (as determined pursuant to Section 65852.2 of the Government Code) shall be considered a separate residential unit and shall be subject to this fee.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
439
March 9, 2023
/ 11
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
A Existing Residential Land Uses
SECTION IV
DEMOGRAPHICS
Demographic data provided by (i) the Nielsen company, a leading information, measurement, and data analytics company, (ii) the California Department of Finance, and (iii) the US Census, was used to estimate the existing number of housing units and population in the City. Notably, DTA attempted to utilize metrics (e.g., average household size, square footage, etc.) that standardized existing demographics with DTA's projections.
According to the information provided by the California Department of Finance, and the Nielsen Company, there are currently 55,890 existing residents residing in 20,247 residential single-family, multi -family, and mobile home housing units in the City. The persons -per - unit figure of 2.76 was also derived from the data published by the California Department of Finance.
Table 2: Estimated Existing Residential Development
Existing existing Housi
Kisidential Land Use
I
Residents 1 Uni
Residents per Uni
Residential
:•0
:•0 20,247
Note:
1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
B Existing Non -Residential Land Uses
The existing non-residential square footage was compiled and estimated using CoStar. In addition, the employees per square foot for commercial, office, and industrial non- residential land uses was based on information published in the U.S. Energy Information Administration's Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey ("CBECS") released in December of 2018. Notably, the number of units and building square footage presented below in Table 3 shall be considered "existing development".
In the City, there are approximately 2,624,940 total square feet of existing non-residential development; including 2,014,054 square feet of commercial development and 610,886 square feet of industrial development. Based on information provided by the CBECS and the Nielsen Company's Employment Profiles (2022), the City has 4,944 employees, specifically 4,028 commercial employees and 916 industrial employees. Based on utilizing the existing employee data and the existing square feet data, DTA generated employee's - per -thousand -square -foot factor ("EPSF") of 2.00 for commercial and 1.50 for industrial, as shown in Table 3 below.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
440
March 9, 2023
/12
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
SECTION IV
DEMOGRAPHICS
Table 3: Estimated Existing Non -Residential Development' Non -Residential Land Use Existing Employees Persons Served Existing Building Square Feet
Commercial
Industrial
• �::.
Note:
1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
C Future Residential Land Uses (2042)
The anticipated number of residential units in the City by 2042 are based on projections from the City's 2016 General Plan. DTA determined that the City is expected to grow by 9,830 residential units by the end of the 2042 build -out period. Maintaining the City residents -per -unit factor of 2.76, the City will see an increase of 27,135 residents through 2042, the time horizon utilized for this Fee Study. Table 4 presented below summarizes the projected number of housing units for residential land uses over the build -out period.
Table 4: Future Residential Development'
Residential Land Use Future Residents Future Housing Residents per Units Unit
Residential•
Note:
1 Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
To comply with AB 602, DTA worked with the City staff to determine the average square footage for both single family and multi -family residences. Using building permit information from 2017 to 2022, DTA determined that the combined average residential square foot unit was 2,260 square feet per unit across single family and multi -family residences. Based on the total anticipated future residential development of 9,830 residential units, this results in a total of over 22.2 million square feet of future residential development, as shown in Table 5 below.
Table 5: Future Residential Development Sq. Ft.
Category•
.
Total Residential Units
9,830
Average Sq. Ft. per Unit
2,260
Total Residential Sq. Ft.
22,213,394
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
441
March 9, 2023
/ 13
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
D Future Non -Residential Land Uses (2042)
SECTION IV
DEMOGRAPHICS
To generate the 2042 non-residential build -out square footage totals presented in this Fee Study, DTA utilized the projected numbers provided in the buildout summary presented in the 2016 General Plan. Notably, these figures were adjusted to account for the City's plan for three (3) industrial developments totaling approximately 2.3 million square feet. This totals approximately 6,975,060 square feet over the build -out period. This includes approximately 4,185,946 square feet of commercial and 2,789,060 square feet of industrial development.
Table 6: Future Non -Residential Development'
Non -Residential Land Use Projected
Employees
Persons
Served
Proj ed Building Square
Feet
Commercial
:.
•�.
Industrial
Note:
1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
E Summary of Existing and Future Non -Residential Land Uses (2042) The following table provides a summary of the City existing and future service population (i.e., Persons Served) based on information discussed in this section and presented in Tables 2 to 6.
Table 7: Summary of Existing and Future Persons Served' Non -Residential Land Existing
Use Residents b
Persons Served
Future
Residents b
Persons Served
Residential:•�
Commercial
:.
Industrial
�•
Note:
1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
442
March 9, 2023
/14
SECTION V
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
V METHODOLOGY USED TO CALCULATE FEES
METHODOLOGY USED TO
CALCULATE FEES
There are many methods used in calculating fees, but they are all based on determining the cost of needed improvements and assigning those costs equitably to various types of development. In determining a reasonable nexus for each specific type of public facility, DTA utilized the methodologies described below, depending upon the data and information available from the City and its current infrastructure policies.
A Standards -Based Fee Methodology
The methodology used to establish the DIFs outlined in this Study for General Facilities, Police, and Park facilities, is based on "standards," where costs are based on existing LOS.
This Standards -Based Methodology establishes a generic unit cost for capacity which is then applied to each land use per the existing LOS. The LOS is based on the existing number of applicable units, such as square feet of building space or acres of land or "per resident" for each facility. This standard is not based on cost but rather on a standard of service. The Standards -Based Methodology ensures that City facilities are appropriately developed and sized so that future residents and employees do not cause a reduced LOS by unduly burdening the infrastructure system, thus leading to decay and deterioration. This methodology provides several advantages, including not needing to know the cost of a specific facility or having to commit to a specific size of the facility.
B Plan -Based Fee Methodology
The methodology used to establish the DIFs outlined in this Study for Traffic and Storm Drainage, is based on a "plan," such as a Master Plan of Facilities, Capital Improvement Plan, or General Plan, which identifies a finite set of improvements to be implemented. These Facility Plans generally identify a finite set of facilities needed by the public agency and are developed according to assessments of facilities needs prepared by staff and/or outside consultants and adopted by the public agency's legislative body. Using this plan -based approach, specific costs can be projected and assigned to all land uses planned, often with a specific time period in mind that reflects new development projections. By using population, units, and residential and non-residential square footage numbers, it is possible to assign a cost allocation percentage for both new and existing development. In preparing an impact fee analysis, facilities costs attributed to future development can then be allocated to each land use class in proportion to the demand caused by each type of development.
C Capacity -Based Fee Methodology
Another method of fee assessment used is based on the "capacity" of a service or system, such as a water tank, a sewer plant, or a storm drain. This kind of fee is not dependent on a particular land use plan (i.e., amount or intensity) but rather it is based on a rate or cost per unit of capacity that can be applied to any type of development, as long as the system has adequate capacity. This fee is useful when the costs of the facility or system are unknown at the outset; however, it requires that the capacity used by a particular land use City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
443
March 9, 2023
/ 15
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
SECTION V
METHODOLOGY USED TO
CALCULATE FEES
type be measurable and the information to be available. Capacity -based impact fees are assessed based on the demand rate per unit.
D Summary of Fee Methodology
As shown in the table below, the Standards -Based level of service ("LOS") methodology is used to generate fees for Public Facilities, Fire, and Parks, and a Plan -Based methodology is used to generate the Traffic and Storm Drainage Fees.
Table 8: Fee Methodology (by Fee Category Type)
Public Facilities
Standard -Based
Existing Standard
Fire
Existing Standard
Parks
Existing Standard
Traffic
Plan -Based
Needs List
Drainage
Needs List
For Fees calculated using the Plan -Based approach, the City has provided DTA with the list of Future Facilities to be included in the Fee Study (the "Needs List"). For the purposes of the City's DIF program, the Needs List is intended to be the official public document identifying the facilities eligible to be financed, in whole or in part, through the imposition of a DIF on new development within the City. The Needs List is organized by facility element (or type) and includes cost information, as outlined in the table below.
Table 9: Description of Needs List Cost Sections
The total estimated facility cost, including engineering, Total Cost for Facility
design, construction, land acquisition, and equipment (as City
applicable).
Offsetting Revenues
Share of total offsetting revenues allocated to new or existing to New and Existing
development.
City
Development
Net Cost to City
The difference between the total cost and the offsetting Calculated by
revenues (column 1 plus column 2).
DTA
Percent of Cost
Allocated to New
Net cost allocated to new development based on new
Calculated by
Development
development's share of facilities.
DTA and the City
Net Cost Allocated to
The net cost to the City multiplied by the percentage cost Calculated by
New Development
allocated to new development.
DTA
Policy Background or
Identifies the policy source or rationale for facility need.
City General Plan,
Objective
CIP, City Staff
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
444
March 9, 2023
/16
SECTION V
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
METHODOLOGY USED TO
CALCULATE FEES
The facilities included on the Needs List for each Fee (presented in Appendix B) are provided by the City and reflect either the City's goals of maintaining and improving a specific area, or they are part of a more formal policy document, such as a General Plan, Master Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, or other official policy or document, etc. Specific estimated facility costs are provided by the City and used as a basis for determining the allocation of revenues between new and existing development. DTA surveyed City staff and consultants on the required facilities needed to serve the City through buildout, as a starting point for its fee calculations.
E Allocation of Benefit
El Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs) and Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs The methodologies employed in this Fee Study use Equivalent Dwelling Units ("EDUs") and Equivalent Benefit Units ("EBUs") as method of identifying and quantifying benefit of certain facilities and ensuring that an equitable portion of the total facilities costs are allocated to future growth, based on the proportion of need generated by that growth. EDUs are a means of quantifying different land uses in terms of their equivalence to a residential dwelling unit, where equivalence is measured in terms of potential infrastructure use or benefit for each type of public facility. In this Study, EDUs are used as a basis of allocation for Public Facilities, Fire, Library and Parks. In contrast, for Traffic and Storm Drainage, EBUs are used to allocate costs to future growth and generate fees.
Table 10: Basis of Allocation (by Fee Category Type)
Fee -..
Public Facilities
Persons Served
Fire
Persons Served
Parks
Population
Traffic
Average Daily Trips
Storm Drainage
Stormwater Runoff Coefficients
E.2 Persons Served
For many of the facilities considered in this Fee Study, service population (or Persons Served) will be used to allocate benefits among fee categories. For purposes of this Fee Study, the Persons Served calculations are based on the number of residents per dwelling unit (i.e., persons per household) and number of employees per 1,000 sq. ft. generated by each land use class. Based on years of performing a variety of fiscal and economic impact studies and with experience in a variety of both public and private sectors, DTA has determined that utilizing a service population, or Persons Served population, comprised of all residents and 50% of employees is common practice in quantifying the impact of a new development in each service area. This number suggests that a resident generally has twice the impact of an employee.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
445
March 9, 2023
/17
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
E.3 Average Daily Trips ('ADTs )
SECTION V
METHODOLOGY USED TO
CALCULATE FEES
Traffic Impact Fees were calculated for each of the three (3) land use categories based on the number of ADTs generated by each land use. ADTs are published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers ("ITE") Publication Trips Generation, loth Edition. The ADT generation rates are per dwelling unit (for residential units) and daily trip generation per 1,000 building square feet of each category of non-residential development. Notably, in order to more appropriately evaluate the impacts of non -passenger cars generated by commercial and industrial uses that tend to have a more significant impact on the roadway system, DTA applied the persons served methodology discussed above to determine the EDUs applicable to each land use. These EDUs were then multiplied by the ADT generation rate for an EDU (i.e., the ADT generation rate for single family), and adjusted by the appropriate Passenger -Car -Equivalent ("PCE") adjustment factors for each land use, to determine the total trips generated by each such land use.
Per the ITE, a trip or trip end is a single or one -direction person or vehicle movement with either the origin or the destination existing or entering) inside a study site. In technical terms, a trip has an origin and a destination at its respective ends (known as trip ends). Each trip end is part of a trip. For trip site generation, the focus is the trips entering and existing a single site. Specifically, ADTs are the total number of trips, both inbound and outbound, within a 24-hour weekday period, generated by a particular use or development.
E.4 Stormwater Runoff Coefficients
The methodology used to allocate drainage costs to future development is relative runoff contribution. The Rational Method for computing runoff rates was used in the form of Q = C x I x A where " Q" is equal to runoff volume, "C" is the ratio of impervious area to total area studied, "I" is rainfall intensity, and "A" is Area, in acres of the City. A runoff factor, "C" of 1.00, indicates a totally impervious site, where every drop of rain would find its way to the public streets as run-off. Only the relative contribution of runoff between land uses needs to be considered. Thus, the "unit runoff", or runoff per storm intensity (Q/I) can be computed using only the runoff factor and acreage data. To estimate the acreage for purposes of applying the Drainage runoff factors, runoff coefficient factors from the 2020 Caltrans Highway Design Manual Hydrology chapter were used.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
446
March 9, 2023
/18
SECTION V
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
METHODOLOGY USED TO
CALCULATE FEES
The table below summarizes the EDUs/EBUs applied in the Fee Study.
Table 11: Equivalent Dwelling Units/Benefit Units
Public Facilities
Persons Served
EDU
21,143
12,104
33,247
Fire
Persons Served
EDU
21,143
12,104
33,247
Parks'
Population
NA
-
-
-
Traffic2
Average Daily Trips
EBU
87,920
118,878
206,798
Drainage
Total Unit Runoff
EBU
4,042
2,256
6,298
Note:
1. Park fee calculations are based on the 2016 General Plan standard of 3.5 acres per 1,000 residents, and do not generate existing and projected EDWEBUs.
2. As discussed in Section VI, the Needs List for transportation facilities was developed based on the 1992 General Plan, to address the impacts of new growth. The infrastructure identified at the time and updated in subsequent General Plan updates, was designed to facilitate new development in the City while maintaining the then level of service for existing development in 1992. Because of this, the Needs List (as updated and modified since 1992) only identifies improvements meant to serve development starting from 1992 through buildout. Therefore, for purposes of determining "existing development", development prior to 1992 has been excluded from the analysis.
The subsequent sections present the reasonable relationship of benefit, impact, and proportionality tests for each fee element (i.e., Public Facilities, Fire, Parks, Traffic, and Storm Drainage), as well as the analysis undertaken to apportion costs for each type of facility. More detailed fee calculation worksheets for each type of facility are included in Appendix A.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
447
March 9, 2023
/19
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
VI CALCULATION OF FEES
A Public Facilities
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
A.1 Public Facilities (Nexus Requirement AB 1600)
The Public Facilities element includes the facilities necessary to provide basic governmental services and public facilities maintenance services, exclusive of public safety, throughout the City. Notably, all furniture, fixtures, and equipment have been consolidated into an integrated unit that includes all department equipment, such as furniture modules, computer hardware and other equipment, to simplify the representation of the data. The proposed DIF discussed in this section, if adopted, would be imposed, collected, and spent on the acquisition of land, construction of new public buildings, and expansion of existing City facilities to accommodate new growth.
Table 12: Public Facilities Element
Identify the use of the fee. Acquisition of facilities used to provide Public Buildings, additional facilities vehicles, and equipment in the City.
New residential and non-residential development in the
City will generate additional residents and employees who Demonstrate how there is a will increase the demand for services in the City, including reasonable relationship between public works and Public government functions. Population the need for the public facility and and growth have a direct impact on the need for the type of development project government services and facilities, thus a reasonable on which the fee is imposed. relationship exists between new development and government facilities, which will have to be acquired to meet the increased demand. Fees collected from new
development will be used exclusively for Public Facilities.
The table below identifies the current inventory for Public Facilities. Notably, all furniture, fixtures, and equipment have been consolidated into one (1) integrated unit that includes all department equipment, such as furniture modules and other equipment, to simplify the representation of the data.
Table 13: Public Facilities Inventory (2022)
L
Buildings (Square Feet)
89,200
Land (Acres)
14.7 Vehicles (Number of Vehicles)
13.0 Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (Integrated Unit)
1.0 City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
448
March 9, 2023
/20
SECTION VI
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
A.Z Calculation Methodology
CALCULATION OF FEES
The Public Facilities Fee was calculated using the Standards -Based Methodology discussed in Section V. For future development to receive the same LOS as exists today, the City will need to acquire or construct additional public building facilities, vehicles, and equipment. Assuming the City's growth through 2042, the City will need to acquire or construct additional infrastructure in order to continue to maintain the existing LOS.
A.3 Level of Service ("LOS')
As stated earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 the Governor of California signed AB 602 which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that when applicable, a nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS, and include an explanation of why the new LOS is necessary. The LOS used to calculate the Public Facilities Impact fees in this section is the existing LOS as defined as the relationship between the replacement cost of Public Facilities (as described in this section) and the City's existing persons served population as discussed in Section IV. The current LOS is calculated by dividing the total inventory of a facility type, as noted above, by the existing number of Persons Served within the City. As indicated below, the existing LOS for every 1,000 persons served is 1,532 square feet of building space. The same LOS methodology applies to land, vehicles and integrated equipment and is presented below.
Table 14: Public Facilities Current LOS (2022)
Public
Total
Facility Type
Facilities
Existing per 000
Persons
ServedInventory •- -.
[a]
[b] [c] _ [a] / [b]
Buildings (Square Feet)
89,200
1,532
Land (Acres)
14.7 0.252
Vehicles (Number of Vehicles)
13.0 58,362 0.223
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment
1.0 0.017
(Integrated Unit)
The facility units generated in the table above are used to determine future facilities units funded by new development in 2042, that are presented below in Table 14.
The mathematics behind these calculations are presented in detail in Appendix A.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
449
March 9, 2023
/21
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
Table 1S: Future Public Facilities (New Development)
[a]
[b] [c] _ [a] x [b] / 1,000
Buildings (Square Feet)
1,532
33,413
43,625
Land (Acres) 0.252
8.410
Vehicles (Number of Vehicles) 0.223
7.44 Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment
0.017
0.573
(Integrated Unit)
Notably, it's important to note that construction costs are dependent on the real estate market at the time of development. Location, demand for land, encumbrances, comparable acquisitions, and construction costs, are a few of the many variables that play into appraisals and negotiations. Each facility will have its own location and improvement requirements. However, DTA was able to determine cost estimates, on a per -square -foot basis, for Public Facilities, based on historical and current data available and input from the City. These cost estimates were then applied to the future facility units.
Table 16: Public Facilities Total Costs
MftWpe
Facility Units Funded by Cost Per Unit
New Development
Total Facility Cost for
Future Development
Buildings (Square Feet)
43,625 $531
$23,162,691
Land (Acres)
8.410 $302,389
$2,543,119
Vehicles (Number)
7.44 $15,531
$115,588
Equipment (Integrated Unit)
0.573 $224,500
$128,527
Total Facilities Cost
$25,949,926
Total Future EDUs (see Table 11)
12,104
Cost per EDU
$2,144
A.4 Public Facilities Fee Calculations
Once the total future facility cost has been determined, the maximum calculated fee for each land use category can be generated. This is done by dividing the total future facility cost by the projected Public Facilities EDUs to generate a per-EDU rate, which equals $2,144 as shown below. As discussed in Section III, per the directive of AB 602, for housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, will no longer be on a per -unit basis, but will be calculated based on square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
450
March 9, 2023
/22
SECTION VI
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
CALCULATION OF FEES
As seen in the table below, the fee per sq. ft. was determined by first multiplying the cost per EDU of $2,144 by the total number of residential EDUs (9,830), resulting in total amount funded from residential property of over $21.1 million. This result was then divided by the total anticipated residential square feet (22,213,394) to generate the residential fee per square foot of $0.95. Details of this calculation are shown in the table below.
Table 17: Public Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary per Residential Land Use Category E26z
Residential
1.00 9,830
9,830
Total Residential
N/A
9,830
[a]
9,830
Total Cost per EDU
[b]
$2,144
Total Costs
[c] _ [a] x [b]
$21,074,294
Total Residential Sq. Ft.
[d]
22,213,394
Total Cost per Residential Sq. Ft.
[e] _ [c]/[d]
$0.95
Note:
1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
Similarly, the non-residential Fee per 1,000 sq. ft. was determined by multiplying the cost per EDU of $2,144 by the total number of non-residential EDUs applicable with each land use type. The table below summarizes the Fee amounts per 1,000 sq. ft. and the total cost financed by Fees imposed on non-residential land uses.
Table 18: Public Facilities Costs Financed by Fee Summary per Non -Residential Land Use Category
—I
nd Use Type -
t
r__ -1 Moo
EDUs per 1,000 Fee per 1,000
R- R-
Non -Res. Sq. Ft.
ML
__�q
Costs Financed
WM
[a] [b] = [a] x $2,144
[c]
[d] = ([c] / 1,000) x
[b]
Commercial
0.36 $777
4,185,946
$3,251,010
Industrial
0.27 $582
2,789,114
$1,624,622
Total Costs
$4,875,632
Note:
1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
451
March 9, 2023
/23
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
A.5 Proposed Fees
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
A summary of the proposed Public Facilities Fee is presented in the tables below.
Table 19: Public Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary per Land Use Category IrLand .-
off -
Residential
$0.95 22,213,394
$21,074,294
Commercial
$777 4,185,946
$3,251,010
Industrial
$582 2,789,114
$1,624,622
Total
$25,949,926
Table 20: Public Facilities Fee Summary
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) 1
$0.95
Commercial (per 1,000 Sq. Ft.)
$777
Industrial (per 1,000 Sq. Ft.)
$582
Note:
1. ADUs larger than 750 Sq. Ft
dwelling unit.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
are charged a proportional amount to the primary single-family 452
March 9, 2023
/24
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
B Fire
B.1 Fire Facilities (Nexus Requirement AB 1600)
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
The Fire Facilities element includes those facilities used by the City to maintain Fire services. The fees collected from new development will be used exclusively for Fire facilities. All new development within the City contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of development on Fire facilities and creates the need for new facilities to accommodate growth. The facilities, equipment, and vehicles used to provide these services will have to be purchased or replaced to meet this increased demand. Thus, a reasonable relationship exists between the need for Fire facilities and impact of residential and non-residential development.
Table 21: Fire Facilities Element
Identify the use of the fee. The build -out and improvement of existing facilities along with vehicle and equipment replacement.
New residential and non-residential development will
generate additional residents and employees who will
Demonstrate how there is a require additional service calls increasing the need for reasonable relationship between trained Fire Department personnel. Equipment and vehicles the need for the public facility and used to provide these services will have to be purchased or the type of development project on replaced to meet this increased demand. Thus, a reasonable which the fee is imposed. relationship exists between the need for Fire facilities and the impact of residential and non-residential development.
Facility fees collected from new development will be used exclusively for Fire facilities.
The table below identifies the current inventory for Fire facilities. Notably, all furniture, fixtures, and equipment have been consolidated into one integrated unit that includes all department equipment, such as furniture modules and other equipment, to simplify the representation of the data.
Table 22: Fire Facilities Inventory (2022)
Buildings (Square Feet)
19,900
Land (Acres)
5.18 Vehicles (Number of Vehicles)
16.0 Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (One Integrated Unit)
1.0 B.2 Calculation Methodology
The Fire Facilities fee was calculated using the Standards -Based Methodology City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
453
March 9, 2023
/25
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
discussed in Section V. For future development to receive the same LOS as exists today, the City will need to acquire or construct additional Fire facilities, vehicles and equipment.
B.3 Level of Service (LOS')
As stated in earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 the Governor of California signed AB 602 which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that when applicable, a nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS, and include an explanation of why the new LOS is necessary. The LOS used to calculate the Fire Facilities Impact fees in this section is the existing LOS as defined as the relationship between the replacement cost of Fire Facilities (as described in this section) and the City's existing persons served population as discussed in Section IV. The current LOS is calculated by dividing the total inventory of a facility type, as noted above, by the existing number of Persons Served within the City. As indicated below, the existing LOS for every 1,000 persons served is 342 square feet of building space. The same LOS methodology applies to land, vehicles and integrated equipment and is presented below.
Table 23: Public Facilities Current LOS (2022)
[a] [b] [c] = [a] / [b]
Buildings (Square Feet) 19,900 341
Land (Acres) 5.18 0.089
Vehicles (Number of Vehicles) 16.0 58,362 0.274
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment
(Integrated Unit) 1.0 0.017
The facility units generated in the table above are used to determine future Fire Facility Units (buildings, land, vehicles, and equipment) funded by new development in 2042, as presented below. Further details behind these calculations are presented in Appendix A.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
454
March 9, 2023
/26
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
Table 24: Future Fire Facilities (New Development)
[a]
[b] [c] _ [a] x [b] / 1,000
Buildings (Square Feet)
341
33,413
11,393
Land (Acres) 0.089
2.966
Vehicles (Number of Vehicles) 0.274
9.160
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment
0.017
0.573
(Integrated Unit)
Notably, it's important to note that construction costs are dependent on the real estate market at the time of development. Location, demand for land, encumbrances, comparable acquisitions, and construction costs are a few of the many variables that play into appraisals and negotiations. Each facility will have its own location and improvement requirements. However, DTA determined general cost estimates, on a per -square -foot basis, for Fire facilities, based on historical and current data available. It's also important to note that building costs for public safety facilities are somewhat higher than conventional structures as they must be built to a higher standard and higher level of use (24-hour use). These cost estimates were then applied to the future facility units. Please see Table 25 below for additional detail regarding the costs for Fire facilities.
Table 25: Fire Total Facilities Costs
Facility .-
L
Facility TnN!
unded.
Development
Total Facility Cost
e
Development
Buildings (Square Feet)
11,393
$1,000
$11,392,824
Land (Acres)
2.966
$302,389
$896,757
Vehicles (Number)
9.160
$313,750
$2,873,969
Equipment (Integrated Unit)
0.573
$250,000
$143,126
Total Facilities Cost
$15,306,675
Total Future EDUs (see Table 11)
12,104
Cost per EDU
$1,265
*Note: Some figures may not sum due to rounding.
B.4 Fire Facilities Fee Calculation
Once the total future facility cost has been determined, the maximum calculated fee for each land use category can be generated. This is done by dividing the total future facility cost by the projected Fire Facilities EDUs to generate a per EDU rate, which City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
455
March 9, 2023
/27
SECTION VI
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
CALCULATION OF FEES
equals $1,265 per EDU as shown above. As discussed in Section II, per the directive of AB 602, for housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, will no longer be on a per -unit basis, but will be calculated based on the square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate.
In the table below, the fee per Sq. Ft. was determined by first multiplying the cost per EDU of $1,265 by the total number of residential EDUs (9,830), resulting in total amount funded from residential property of $12,430,763. This result was then divided by the total anticipated residential square feet (22,213,394) to generate the Fee per square foot of $0.56. Details of this calculation are shown in the table below.
Table 26: Fire Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary per Residential Land Use Category Land - Type
61L
nber ofiswonversio
per •r —
ojected Units/
Factor
Residential
1.00 9,830
9,830
Total Residential
9,830
[a]
9,830
Total Cost per EDU
[b]
$1,265
Total Fees
[c] _ [a] x [b]
$12,430,763
Total Residential Sq. Ft.
[d]
22,213,394
Total Cost per Residential Sq. Ft.
[e] _ [c]/[d]
$0.56
*Note: Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
Similarly, the Fee per 1,000 Sq. Ft. for non-residential development was determined by multiplying the cost per EDU of $1,265 by the total number of non-residential EDUs applicable with each land use type. The table below summarizes the Fee amounts per 1,000 Sq. Ft. and the total cost financed by Fees imposed on non- residential land uses.
Table 27: Fire Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary per Non -Residential Land Use Category
EDUs per Fee per 1,000
111
Costs Financed
se Type 1,000 Non- Non -Res. Sq. Ft.
FRes. Sq. Ft.
Non -Res. Sq. Ft. by Fees
- 000
Commercial•..
Industrial 0.18 ..
2,789,114•0
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
456
March 9, 2023
/28
SECTION VI
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
B.S Proposed Fees
CALCULATION OF FEES
A summary of the proposed Fire Fees is presented below.
Table 28: Fire Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary per Land Use Category Land Type71ft./1,0
es. Fee per Sq. projected Res. Sq. Costs Financed by
per Sq. Ft. 00 Non -Res Fee tP./Non-Res. Sq. Ft. Fees
per
�� :•$958,290
Table 29: Fire Facilities Fee Summary
-. -
Residential (per Sq. Ft.)'
$0.56
Commercial (per 1,000 Sq. Ft.)
$458
Industrial (per 1,000 Sq. Ft.)
$344
Note:
1. ADUs larger than 750 Sq. Ft. are charged a proportional amount to the single-family primary dwelling unit.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
457
March 9, 2023
/29
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
C Parks Fees
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
C.1 Park Development Facilities Fees (Nexus Requirement AB 1600) The Park Facilities element will serve City residents by providing facilities for recreation while enhancing the community's appeal and quality of life. The type of facilities described in this section include Neighborhood Parks and Community Parks. The Fee Study includes a component for the development of new park and recreation facilities to serve new residential development for the City through 2042.
Covered in this fee section are park improvements, land acquisition, and park renovation. In contrast to the fees covered earlier in this Fee Study, non-residential development will be excluded from the fee calculation.
According to the City's General Plan, in addition to improving the overall quality of life for residents, excellent park and recreation programs are important for the well- being of a city's business community. Not only do parks make the community more attractive to residents (providing a stronger market base for local businesses), but they can also directly influence a city's ability to enhance its fiscal base by attracting commercial and industrial businesses.
Table 30: Parks and Recreation Facilities
Identify the use of the fee. The construction of new parks, recreational facilities, vehicles, and equipment.
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facility, the
use of the fee, and the type of
development project on which the
fee is imposed.
New residential and non-residential development
will generate an increased demand for Park and
Recreational Facilities. Population growth will have
a direct impact on the need for Park and Recreation
facilities. New development and the consequential
increase in demand will necessitate the
improvement/expansion of existing Park and
Recreational facilities. Fees collected from new
development will be used exclusively for the
improvement of Park and Recreation Facilities.
C.2 Calculation Methodology
Park DIFs in this study have been calculated utilizing the "Standards -Based" methodology introduced in Section V. According to the City's General Plan, the City's Quimby park ordinance has established a standard of 3.5 acres of parkland per 1,000 Persons. The City currently has 466.76 acres of parkland as shown in the table below.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
458
March 9, 2023
/30
SECTION VI
taCALCULATION OF FEES
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 31: Yucaipa Parks Inventory
�� Park Facility
Acres
John Tooker Civic Park
0.5 Seventh Street Park
13.5 13th Street Sports Complex
29.8 Crafton Hills Park
2.49 Yucaipa Community Park
31.1 Yucaipa Community Center
1.2 Bryant Glen Complex
13.3 El Dorado Ranch Park
334
Flag Hill Veterans Memorial Park
7.8 Wildwood Park
12.9 Avenue I Park
10.3 Yucaipa Equestrian Center
7.2 Avenue A Park
0.5 Center Park
1 Scherer Senior Center
0.67 Lilian Eaton Park
0.5 Total
466.76
Source: City of Yucaipa.
Based on the City's current population of 55,890, the existing standard in the City is
8.35 acres per 1,000 residents. Therefore, per the City's direction, DTA has employed the standard contemplated in the General Plan of 3.5 acres per 1,000 residents.
To determine a fair and accurate land acquisition cost, DTA utilized the CoStar Real Estate Property Platform and created a comparable inventory of 31 undeveloped properties ranging from 1.0 acres to 48.0 acres in and around the City. Each of the properties in the inventory were sold between 2017 and 2022 and an average of their sales price was determined. Based on this inventory, DTA used the average of $302,389 per acre as an estimated cost of land acquisition.
Additionally, in working with City staff, DTA estimated a cost for park development costs of $60,571 per acre. This figure is based on the estimated value of current park facilities and equipment located on the 466.76 acres of parkland currently operated in the City.
C.3 LOS
As stated in earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 the Governor of California signed AB 602 which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that when applicable, a nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
459
March 9, 2023
/31
SECTION VI
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
CALCULATION OF FEES
facility, identify the proposed new LOS, and include an explanation of why the new LOS is necessary. As indicated earlier in this section, the City's Quimby park ordinance has established a standard of 3.5 acres of parkland per 1,000 Persons. This is the LOS to be maintained in compliance with AB 602. Based on the City's current population of 55,890 and current park inventory of 466.76 acres, the existing level of service (i.e., park standard) in the City is 8.35 acres per 1,000 residents. Therefore, it is proposed that there will be no increase in LOS.
C.4 Calculations and Assumptions
The park facilities demand (i.e., EBU) is based on the projected population growth resulting from new development. As shown in the table below, new development is anticipated to add 9,830 new dwelling units to the City.
Table 32: Park Facilities Demand per Unit
Land Use Avg. Household Units
Categories Size per Unit
Multiplying the number of units by the average household size, yield a total anticipated population of 27,135 (i.e., total EBUs), as presented in Table 33 below.
Table 33: Total Park Facilities Created by New Development Total
vg. Household Size
Land Use Categori
nt
Population
per Unit
=====N�
(EBUs)
Residential•:
*Note: Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
Per the City's General Plan, the City's Quimby Park ordinance establishes a standard of
3.5 acres per 1,000 residents, i.e., 0.0035 acres per resident, which the City intends to use as its park standard for future development ("Future Park Standard") to satisfy the demand created by new development. As shown above, new development will generate an additional 27,135 residents. Therefore, the City requires a total of 94.97 additional acres to maintain this LOS.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
460
March 9, 2023
/32
SECTION VI
taCALCULATION OF FEES
www.FinanceDTA.com
Table 34: Total Acres to Meet Future Park Standard
Land Use Total EBUs Park Standard
Total Acres
Categories
Required
Notes:
1. Due to rounding, totals may not sum.
C.5 Fee Calculation
After determining that the City requires a total of 94.97 acres of new park and recreation facilities to meet the Future Park Standard and satisfy the demand created by new development, DTA proceeded to calculate the amount of funding needed to pay for the required acreage of new facilities. The table below presents the total costs of new park facilities (i.e., development and construction costs which equals approximately $34,471,122 in projected facility expenditures necessary to meet the Future Park Standard for new development). Notably, 100% of the park and recreation facilities costs will be allocated to new development as such facilities would satisfy the Future Park Standard and do not reflect any unmet needs or deficiencies pertaining to existing development.
Table 35: Financing Required to Meet Future Park Standards of Acres
Numberr '14WC ost per Aclre4oacilities
RequiredFacility Type=
Cost
Parks Development Facilities 94.97 $362,960
$34,471,122
Offsetting Revenue (Grants/General Fund Contributions)
($4,050,000)
Net Cost of Facilities
$30,421,122
Notes:
1. Due to rounding, totals may not sum.
C.6 Park Facilities Fee Calculations
The total number of Units resulting from new development is 9,830. Dividing the net cost of facilities (i.e., the revenues to be generated by the park fee program) over the 9,830 units yields an allocation cost of $3,095 per unit, as shown below.
Table 36: Cost Allocation per Unit
Total Cost Allocated to
Net Cost of Facilities New Development Cost per Unit
As discussed in Section III, per the directive of AB 602, for housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, are longer be on a per unit basis, City of Yucaipa March 9, 2023
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
461 /33
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
but will be calculated based on square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate. To determine the Fee per sq. ft., the cost allocated to new development ($30,421,122) was divided by the total anticipated residential square feet (22,213,394) and resulted in a Fee for Park facilities of $1.37 per square foot. Details of this calculation are shown in the table below.
Table 37: Parks Costs Financed by Fees Summary per Residential Land Use Category -. Units
Factor
I
r—To t al EDUs
Land Use Type EDUs per
I —
Residential
1.00 9,830
9,830
Total Residential
9,830
[a]
9,830
Total Cost per EDU
[b]
$3,095
Total Fees
[c] = [a] x [b]
$30,421,122
Total Residential Sq. Ft.
[d]
22,213,394
Total Cost per Residential Sq. Ft.
[e] = [c]/[d]
$1.37
C.7 Proposed Fees
The proposed Park Fee amounts are summarized in the tables below and presented in detail in Appendix B.
Table 38: Park Cost Allocation by Land Use Type
Land Use
BUs per Unit ost Allocatio
per Sq. Ft.
revEelopmen CostCategories
Units Finaew nce
.-
��
•
ranee sy: NarK Faculties Fee summary
Residential (per Sq. Ft.)' $1.37
Note:
1. ADUs larger than 750 Sq. Ft. are charged a proportional amount to the single- family primary dwelling unit.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
462
March 9, 2023
/34
SECTION VI
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
D Traffic
D.1 Traffic Facilities
CALCULATION OF FEES
The City's goal is to improve the City's Traffic Facilities throughout the 2042 buildout period. Improvements focus on any planned infrastructure which includes new traffic and safety enhancements, improvements in safety at intersections, crosswalks, lighting, pedestrian improvements, and additional infrastructure. This additional infrastructure support is necessary to provide safe and efficient vehicular access throughout the City. The proposed DIF is to help meet the Traffic demand of new development through 2042. The City identified the need for the Traffic infrastructure and equipment, as shown below.
The Traffic Facilities Fee will provide a source of revenue to the City to allow for the acquisition, installation, and construction of needed Traffic facilities, which in turn will both preserve the quality of life in the City and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the existing and future residents and employees. Traffic Fees will be calculated using the Plan -based approach discussed in Section VI.
Table 40: Traffic Facilities
Various roadway improvements including, but not
Identify of the use of the fee. limited to, crosswalks, lighting, bridges, and road pedestrian safety.
New residential and non-residential development will
generate additional residents and employees who will
Demonstrate how there is a create additional vehicular and non -vehicular traffic reasonable relationship between within the City limits. Streets will have to be improved or the need for the public facility, use extended to meet the increased demand and to of the fee, and type of efficiently direct increased traffic flow. Thus, there is a development project on which the relationship between new development and the need for fee is imposed. new Traffic facilities. Fees collected from new development will be used exclusively for traffic facilities on the Needs List.
Identification of the facilities to be financed is a critical component of any Traffic Impact fee program. In the broadest sense, the purpose of Fees is to protect public health, safety, and general welfare by providing for Traffic facilities. The City has provided DTA with the list of required facilities (the "Facilities Needs List") to be included in the Fee Study. For the purposes of the Fee program, the Facilities Needs List is intended to be the official public document identifying the facilities eligible to be financed, in whole or in part, through the imposition of a fee on new development within the City. The Facilities Needs List is organized by facility element (or type) City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
463
March 9, 2023
/35
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
and includes cost information, as outlined in the table below and presented in detail in the appendix.
The facilities included are provided by the City and reflect either the City's goals of maintaining and improving a specific area, or they are part of a more formal policy document, such as a General Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, etc. Specific estimated facility costs are provided by the City and used as a basis for determining the allocation of revenues between new and existing development.
The table below outlines the proposed facilities and respective costs along with any offsetting revenues. A list of Traffic facilities is included below and in Appendix B at the end of this Study. The cost estimates for the Traffic Facilities category were provided by the City.
Table 41: Traffic Facilities Costs
Transportation Facilities Costs 1
$321,310,256
Offsetting Revenue (Grants/General Fund
Contributions)
($96,076,645)
Offsetting Revenue (Cash on Nand)
($4,000,000)
Traffic Facilities Total
$221,233,611
Notes:
1. An inventory of Planned Traffic Facilities for the City is presented in detail in Appendix B.
2. Offsetting Revenue is presented in detail in Appendix A.
Traffic Impact Fees were calculated for each of the three (3) land use categories based on the number of ADTs generated by each land use. ADTs are published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers ("ITE") Publication Trips Generation, 10th Edition. The ADT generation rates are per dwelling unit (for residential units) and daily trip generation per 1,000 building square feet of each category of non- residential development. Notably, in order to more appropriately evaluate the impacts of non -passenger cars generated by commercial and industrial uses that tend to have a more significant impact on the roadway system, DTA applied the persons served methodology discussed above to determine the EDUs applicable to each land use. These EDUs were then multiplied by the ADT generation rate for an EDU (i.e., the ADT generation rate for single family), and adjusted by the appropriate Passenger -Car -Equivalent ("PCE") adjustment factors for each land use, to determine the total trips generated by each such land use.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
464
March 9, 2023
/36
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
Table 42: Average Daily Trips by Land Use
Trip
passenger Car
DUs per Unips
Daily
Land Use Generation
Equivalent
per 1,000 Sqr
a/Average
(per UnitRate
per EDU
1,000 Sq. Ft.)
-si .ential
weIt
II
...
ercial...
...
�.
Per the ITE, a trip or trip end is a single or one -direction person or vehicle movement with either the origin or the destination existing or entering) inside a study site. In technical terms, a trip has an origin and a destination at its respective ends (known as trip ends). Each trip end is part of a trip. For trip site generation, the focus is the trips entering and existing a single site. Specifically, ADTs are the total number of trips, both inbound and outbound, within a 24-hour weekday period, generated by a particular use or development.
The Needs List for transportation facilities was developed based on the 1992 General Plan, to address the impacts of new growth. The infrastructure identified at the time and updated in subsequent General Plan updates, was designed to facilitate new development in the City while maintaining the then level of service for existing development in 1992. Because of this, the Needs List (as updated and modified since 1992) only identifies improvements meant to serve development starting from 1992 through buildout. Therefore, for purposes of determining "existing development", development prior to 1992 has been excluded from the analysis. For purposes of this analysis, the development prior to 1992 was estimated based on the 1990 Census population (32,987) and estimated housing units (11,950) based on 2.76 persons per household.
Table 43: Average Daily Trips by Land Use
Existing
Development
Baseline
Developme
Future
Development
Buildout
Land Use
evelopment
prior to 1992
for Sizing
through
Development
(2022)
AJ&Facilities
Traffic
#
2042
Residential
(Units)
Commercial
(Sq. Ft.)
Industrial
(Sq. Ft.)
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
465
March 9, 2023
/37
SECTION VI
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
CALCULATION OF FEES
All proposed Traffic facilities were sized to meet the needs of both existing and future residents and employees. After the costs of the adjustments were made, 100% of the cost of total facilities was allocated to new development.
Table 44: Buildout EBU Calculation'
verage Daily
Land Use
Trips (per
projected Non -
Projected Average Daily
Residential
Unit / per
1,000 Sq. F
Units Trips (EBUS)
1,000 Sq. Ft.
Residential...
Commercial
�� ..
Industrial
Total
NA
206,798
Notes:
1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
To calculate the DIFs, DTA first determined the number of total ADTs generated through 2042 based on the expected residential and non-residential growth in the City. The analysis estimates approximately 206,798 total ADTs would be generated by current and future land uses, as detailed in Table 44 above. In this section, EBUs are used instead of EDUs, and as explained in Section VI and they are calculated the same way that EDUs were calculated in each of the previous sections. These calculations are presented in detail in Appendix A.
D.2 Calculation Methodology
Table 45 presented below summarizes the cost per ADT, which is generated by dividing the cost of total Transportation Facilities of $221,233,611 by the number of total ADTs that will be generated through the buildout period (206,798). The cost per ADT totals $1,070 as shown in the table below. The cost per ADT ($1,070) was then applied to the various land uses and their respective ADTs to determine the proposed Traffic fees.
Table 45: Allocation of Facilities to New Development
Facility Costs added to new development $221,233,611
Projected Total Average Daily Trips 206,798
Cost Per Average Daily Trip $1,070
To determine the Traffic Impact Fees, DTA calculated the total ADTs through 2042 based on the anticipated residential and non-residential growth in the City. As shown in Table 46 below, the analysis estimates that new development will generate City of Yucaipa March 9, 2023
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
466 /38
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
total ADTs of approximately 118,878.
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
Table 46: Buildout EBU Calculation'
Average Dai
Non
Land Use
Trips (per rips (perProjecte
rojected -
Average Daily
Residential
Unit /per
Units Trips (EBUS)
1,000 Sq. Ft.
1,000 Sq.
��
Residential
...
..
Notes:
1. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
D.3 Level of Service (LOS')
As stated in earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 the Governor of California signed AB 602 which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that when applicable, a nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS, and include an explanation of why the new LOS is necessary. According to the 2016 city General Plan, to promote the safe and efficient movement of vehicular traffic, the city will maintain a minimum LOS C on all intersections and road segments except for two conditions:
At roadway intersections where traffic movements are controlled by roundabouts, LOS D shall be acceptable (e.g., average control delay of 30 seconds per vehicle or better); and
On roadway segments where a roundabout control at least one of the intersections at the ends of the segment, the lower half of LOS D shall be acceptable.
This section looks at the LOS for traffic facilities, given the planned infrastructure development, to ensure that there will be sufficient system -wide capacity to maintain this current LOS. The proposed LOS will not be increased over and above the current LOS, in terms of traffic levels as per City Policy.
D.4 Fee Calculation
As discussed in Section III, per the directive of AB 602, for housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, will no longer be on a per unit basis, but will be calculated based on square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
467
March 9, 2023
/39
SECTION VI
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
CALCULATION OF FEES
The Fee per sq. ft. was determined by first multiplying the cost per ADT of $1,070 by the total number of residential ADTs (92,795), resulting in the total amount funded from residential property of $99,272,711. This result was then divided by the total anticipated residential square feet (22.2 million) to generate the Fee per square foot of $4.47. Details of this calculation are shown in the table below.
Table 47: Traffic Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary per Residential Land Use Category �1111111111 rand - Type Average Daily Trips Number. -
Residential
9.44 9,830
92,795
Total Residential
N/A
9,830
[a]
92,795
Total Cost per ADT
[b]
$1,070
Total Fees
[c] = [a] x [b]
$99,272,711
Total Residential Sq. Ft.
[d]
22,213,394
Total Cost per Residential Sq. Ft.
[e] = [c]/[d]
$4.47
*Note: Some figures may not sum due to rounding.
Similarly, the Fee per 1,000 Sq. Ft. was determined by multiplying the cost per ADT of $1,070 by the ADTs per 1,000 Sq. Ft. applicable with each land use type (discussed above). The table below summarizes the Fee amounts per 1,000 Sq. Ft. and the total cost financed by Fees imposed on non-residential land uses.
Table 48: Traffic Facilities Costs Financed by Fee Summary per Non -Residential Land Use Category
� Average Daily
Fee
Financed
per,
Land Use Trips (per 1,000 Sq. F
Costs
1,000 Sq. Ft.
b
Fees
1,000 Sq. Ft.)
' �'
=•$12,053,402
*Note: Some figures may not sum due to rounding.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
468
March 9, 2023
/40
SECTION VI
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
D.S Proposed Fees
CALCULATION OF FEES
The proposed Traffic Fee amounts are summarized in the tables below.
Table 49: Traffic Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary per Land Use Category ir
Land .-
-.
see .
Residential
$4.47 22,213,394
$99,272,711
Commercial
$3,787
4,186
$15,850,229
Industrial
$4,322
2,789
$12,053,402
Total
$127,176,342
Table 50: Traffic Facilities Fee Summary
. . uft
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) 1
$4.47
Commercial (per 1,000 Sq. Ft.)
$3,787
Industrial (per 1,000 Sq. Ft.)
$4,322
Note:
ADUs larger than 750 Sq. Ft. are charged a proportional amount to the primary single-family dwelling unit.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
469
March 9, 2023
/41
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
E Storm Drainage Fees
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
E.1 Storm Drainage Facilities (Nexus Requirement AB 1600) The Storm Drainage Facilities element will serve the residents of City by providing facilities that ensure proper water Drainage in those areas susceptible to storm water runoff. Storm Drainage Facilities include those used by the City to provide storm Drainage services to both residents and employees within the City. The Storm Drainage Fee will include facilities and improvements necessary to handle the storm Drainage runoff created by new development through build -out by the year 2042.
The City identified the need for facilities and improvements as shown below in Table 51.
Table 51: Storm Drainage Facilities Nexus Requirement
Provide protection through an upgraded storm Drainage
Identify the use of the fee. system and construct storm Drainage pipeline and appurtenant structures.
The cost of storm Drainage systems is directly related to the amount of runoff delivered to City streets. New
development will increase the number of impermeable
surfaces in the City and subsequently the amount of
Demonstrate how there is a reasonable stormwater runoff that needs to be collected and relationship between the need for the disposed of in a manner that will prevent flooding. New public facility, use of the fee, and type storm Drainage systems and infrastructure are necessary of development project on which the to ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve fee is imposed. new residential and non-residential development.
Therefore, there is a reasonable relationship between the needs for the facilities and new development. Fees
collected from new development will be used exclusively for Storm Drainage purposes.
For Storm Drainage Facilities, the City has provided DTA with the list of Future Facilities to be included in the Fee Study (the "Needs List"). Please refer to Section V for details on the Needs List. Table 52 below provides a summary of the Needs List.
The facility costs presented below are based on estimates provided by the City.
According to the City, it has been determined that these facilities are needed to serve new development. Currently, these facilities are generally operating at an appropriate and acceptable LOS. Therefore, the costs of facilities have been allocated to new development and existing development based on their expected usage at build -out.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
470
March 9, 2023
/42
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
Table 52: Storm Drainage Facilities Costs
Drainage Facilities
Planned Storm Drainage Facilities for the City
$306,022,303
Storm Drainage Facilities Subtotal
$306,022,303
Offsetting Revenue (Grants/General Fund Contributions)
$0
Storm Drainage Facilities Total
$306,022,303
E.2 Level of Service ("LOS')
As stated in earlier in Section III, in September of 2021 the Governor of California signed AB 602 which provides new statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose DIFs on development projects. Among these new requirements is that when applicable, a nexus study shall identify the existing LOS for each public facility, identify the proposed new LOS, and include an explanation of why the new LOS is necessary. In 1993, the City adopted a Master Plan for Drainage that identified the drainage improvements throughout the city necessary to confine the 100-year flood flows. This section looks at the LOS for Storm Drainage facilities to ensure that there will be sufficient system -wide capacity to direct storm Drainage runoff at storm recurrence intervals as dictated by City policy from new and existing development.
The proposed LOS will not be increased over and above the current LOS, in terms of flood protection levels as per City Policy.
E.3 Calculation Methodology
Storm Drainage Fees were calculated for each of the three (3) land use categories based on the runoff rates, measured in terms relative contribution of runoff, (i.e., the EBU factor - see Section V) generated by each land use. Specifically, the reasonable relationship used to allocate storm Drainage costs between existing, converted use and future development is relative runoff contribution. A rational method of computing runoff rates was used in the form of Q = C x I x A, where " Q" is equal to runoff volume, "C' is the ratio of impervious area to total area studied, "I" is rainfall intensity, and "A" is Area, in acres of the study area. A runoff factor, "C" of 1.00, indicates a totally impervious site, where every drop of rain would find its way to the public streets as runoff. However, it can be shown that only the relative contribution of runoff needs to be considered if a unit of runoff is computed (Q/I), where only the runoff factor and acreage are considered. This is the assumption used in this calculation.
Total Runoff was calculated by applying these runoff factors to the estimated acreage attributable to the various dwelling unit counts and non-residential square feet identified in the demographics section of this Fee Study. As discussed in Section V, to estimate the acreage for purposes of applying the Drainage runoff factors, runoff coefficient factors from the 2020 Caltrans Highway Design Manual Hydrology chapter were used.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
471
March 9, 2023
/43
SECTION VI
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
CALCULATION OF FEES
All proposed Storm Drainage facilities were sized to meet the needs of both existing and future residents and employees. Therefore, the costs of these facilities have been allocated between existing development and new development based on their percentage of build -out EBUs. As illustrated below in Table 53, 64.18% of the costs will be allocated to existing development and 35.82% of the costs will be allocated to new development. Based on this allocation between new and existing development, $109,619,731 of the $306,022,302 in Storm Drainage facilities costs would be funded by the Fee imposed on new development. The remaining $196,402,571 must be funded through other sources to be determined by the City.
Table 53: Storm Drainage Facilities Cost Allocation Summary c- .. - -
Existing Development
64.18%
$196,402,571
New Development
35.82%
$109,619,731
Total 100% $306,022,303
*Note: Some figures may not sum due to rounding.
The table presented below summarizes the adjusted cost per unit runoff which is generated by dividing the cost to new development of $41,641,553 by the unit runoff that will be generated by new development (2,256). When accounting for the anticipated unit runoff from new development, the cost per unit runoff totals $18,457 as shown in the table below. This cost was then applied to the various land uses and their respective total runoff rates to determine the proposed Fee.
Table 54: Cost Allocation Summary with Adjustments
New Development Share of Storm Drainage Facilities
$109,619,731
DIF Expenditures b Credits 1
($67,978,178)
Total Adj. Cost Allocated to New Development
$41,641,553
Cost per Unit of Runoff
$18,457
Notes:
1. DIF Expenditures per the City of Yucaipa.
To determine the Storm Drainage Fees, DTA calculated the total runoff expected through 2042 based on the anticipated residential and non-residential growth in the City. As shown in Table 55 below, the analysis estimates that new development will generate a total runoff rate of approximately 2,256.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
472
March 9, 2023
/44
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
Table 55: Storm Drainage Usage by Land Use
��
Projected
��
Developed
RuAL
otal
Land Use Type evelopment
Coeunoff(Units/
Sc�
Acreage
(PBUs)
E.4 Storm Drainage Facilities Fee Calculation
As discussed in Section III, per the directive of AB 602, for housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, will no longer be on a per unit basis, but will be calculated based on square footage of proposed units of the development, unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate.
The Fee per sq. ft. was determined by first multiplying the cost per EBU of $18,457 by the total number of residential EBUs (1,904), resulting in total amount funded from residential property of $35,139,649. This result was then divided by the total anticipated residential square feet (22.2 million) to generate the Fee per square foot of $4.20. Details of this calculation are shown in the table below.
Table 56: Storm Drainage Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary per Residential Land Use Category
Land Use Type Tnit Runoff Per Number of Developed Acres EL Acre
Conversion
otal Runo
X
Residential 0.50 3,808
1,904
Total Residential N/A 3,808
[a]
1,904
Total Cost per EBU
[b]
$18,457
Total Fees
[c] = [a] x [b]
$35,139,649
Total Residential Sq. Ft.
[d]
22,213,394
Total Cost per Residential Sq. Ft.
[e] = [c]/[d]
$1.58
*Note: Some figures may not sum due to rounding.
Similarly, the Fee per acre was determined by multiplying the cost per EBU of $18,457 by the total number of non-residential EBUs applicable with each land use type (based on the EBUs per acres discussed above). The table below summarizes the Fee amounts per acre and the total cost financed by Fees imposed on non-residential land uses.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
473
March 9, 2023
/45
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
SECTION VI
CALCULATION OF FEES
Table 57: Storm Drainage Facilities Costs Financed by Fee Summary per Non -Residential Land Use Category
Land Use EBU
_er
"11=L_
Emr,[a]
ee Acre
Developed Costs Financed
Acreage
[b] = [a] x $18,457
[c] [d] = [b] x [c]
Commercial 0.83
$15,227
202.00 $3,075,842
Industrial 0.83
$15,227
225.00 $3,426,062
Total $6,501,904
Note:
1. Source: City of Yucaipa.
E.S Proposed Fees
The proposed Storm Drainage Fee amounts are summarized in Tables 58 and 59 below.
Table 58: Storm Drainage Facilities Costs Financed by Fees Summary per Land Use Category - -by
-.
Fees
Residential
$1.58
22,213,394
$35,139,649
Commercial
$15,227
202
$3,075,842
Industrial
$15,227
225
$3,426,062
Total
$41,641,553
Table 59: Storm Drainage Facilities Fee Summary
42&-
- M
Residential (per Sq. Ft.) 1
$1.58
Commercial (per acre.)
$15,227
Industrial (per acre.)
$15,227
Note:
1. ADUs larger than 750 Sq. Ft. are charged a proportional amount to the primary single-family dwelling unit.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
474
March 9, 2023
/46
SECTION VII
ta
www.FinanceDTA.com
VII SUMMARY OF FEES
SUMMARY OF FEES
The total proposed fee amounts to finance new development's share of the costs of new facilities are summarized below.
Table 60: Development Impact Fee Summary
Land Use 1 z
Dim acilities Fire Parks Traff��ml
Residential (Per S . Ft.)
Non -Residential (Per 1,000Sq. Ft.)
__MFPNon-Residential
Drainage
Residential (Per S . Ft.)
Non -Residential (Per Acre)
Commercial
Notes:
1. Residential unit fees are per square foot.
2. ADUs larger than 750 Sq. Ft. are charged a proportional amount to the primary dwelling unit.
3. Commercial and Industrial Public Facilities, Fire and Traffic fees are "per 1,000 square feet".
4. Commercial and Industrial drainage fees are "per acre".
The cost estimates for Future Facilities used in this Fee Study are stated in 2022 dollars. DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above impact fees be reviewed each year and adjusted based upon the changes in the Engineering News -Record (" ENRI Construction Cost Index. This construction cost index is based upon the Building Cost Index ("BCI") cost averages experienced in the City of Los Angeles as produced by Engineering News -Record.
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
475
March 9, 2023
/47
APPENDIX A
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
FEE DERIVATION
WORKSHEETS
476
Persons per Res. per Unit / EDUs per Unit /
Existing Land Use (2022) Pop / Emp Units Sq. Ft. Acres Unit / Emp per Persons Served Persons served per Persons served, otal EDUs 1,000 Sq. Ft. 1,000 non -Res. per 1,000 non -
Res.
Persons per Res. per Unit / EDUs per Unit /
Pre -Existing Land Use (1992) Pop / Emp Units Sq. Ft. Acres Unit / Emp per Persons Served Persons served per Persons served .otal EDUs 1,000 Sq. Ft. 1,000 non -Res. per 1,000 non -
Res.
Persons per Res. per Unit / EDUs per Unit /
Baseline Existing Land Use (2022 excl. 1992) Pop / Emp Units Sq. Ft. Acres Unit / Emp per Persons Served Persons served per Persons served .otal EDUs 1,000 Sq. Ft. 1,000 non -Res. Per 1,000 non -
Res.
Persons per Res. per Unit / EDUs per Unit /
Persons served,
Projected Land Use 4 Pop /Emp Units Sq. Et. Acres Unit / Emp per Persons Served Persons served per otal EDUs Sq. Ft. 1,000 non -Res. Per 1,000 non -
Persons per I Res. per Unit / EDUs per Unit /
Land Use at Build Out Pop / Emp Units Sq. Ft. Acres Unit / Emp per Persons Served Persons served per Persons served, tal EDUs Sq. Ft. 1,000 non -Res. Per 1,000 non -
Res.
Residential Sq. Ft. Assumptions Quantities
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
TRAFFIC FEE CALCULATION
J11J Ualculation
Resi ents per Um
Number of
Number of Units/
Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/
Total
Land Use Type
Persons Served
Non -Res 1,000 SF
1,000 Non -Res. SF per 1,000 Non -Res SF
Number of EDUs
Residential
27,135
9,830
2.76 1.00
9,830
Subtotal Residential
27,135
99830
9,830
Commercial
4,186
4,185,946
1.00 0.36
1,516
Industrial
2,092
2,789,114
0.75 0.27
758
Subtotal Non-residential
69278
699759060
NA NA
2,274
Total
33,413
12,104
(loij uaicuiation
Resi ents per Um
Number of
Number of Units/
Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/
Total
Land Use Type
Persons Served
Non -Res 1,000 SF
1,000 Non -Res. SF per 1,000 Non -Res SF
Number of EDUs
Residential
50,038
18,127
2.76 1.00
18,127
Subtotal Residential
50,038
18,127
18,127
Commercial
6,200
6,200,000
1.00 0.36
2,246
Industrial
2,550
3,400,000
0.75 0.27
924
Subtotal Non -Residential
8,750
9,600,000
NA NA
3,170
Total
58,788
NA NA
21,297
Calculation
Trip Generation Rate
Adjustment
Total
Land Use Type
per EDU
Total EDUs
Factor (PCE)
Daily Trips
Residential
9.44 9,830
1.0000
92,795
Commercial
9.44 1,516
1.0350
14,816
Industrial
9.44 758
1.5750
11,267
Total
118,878
Buildout EBU Calculation
Trip Generation Rate
Adjustment
Total
Land Use Type
per EDU
Total EDUs
Factor (PCE)
Daily Trips
Residential
9.44 18,127
1.0000
171,119
Commercial
9.44 2,246
1.0350
21,945
Industrial
9.44 924
1.5750
13,735
Total
206,798
Pagc42M 13
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
TRAFFIC FEE CALCULATION
Facility
Cost
Transportation Facilities Cost $321,310,256
Offsetting Revnue (Grants/General Fund
Contributions) ($96,076,645)
Offsetting Revnue (Cash on Hand) ($4,000,000)
Total Facilities Cost $221,233,611
1. Allocation of Development
Facility Cost Faciliti
Buildout Allocated to Cost Pe
acility Daily Trips New Development Daily Tri
ransportation Facilities Cost 206,798 $221,233,611 $1,07 Total Facilities Cost per Daily Trip 206,798 $1,07
Transportation i.ct Fees and Cost Financed
by Fees per III
i
Impact Fees
Cost Financed
New Development
(per Unit/
Land Use Type
Total Trips (EBUs)
by Impact Fees
(Units / Sq. Ft.)
per 1,000 Sq. Ft.)
Residential
92,795
$99,272,711
9,830
$10,099
Commercial
14,816
$15,850,229
4,185,946
$3,787
Industrial
11,267
$12,053,402
2,789,114
$4,322
Initial Allocation to New Development
118,878
12791769342
NA
NA
Transportation
p, and Cost Financed by Fees per p• III i
Non -Residential Fee /
Land Use
Residential Fee / Sq. Ft. 1,000 Sq. Ft.
Units / Sq. Ft
Costs Financed by DIF
Residential
$4.47
9,830
$99,272,711
Commercial
$3,787
4,185,946
$15,850,229
Industrial
$4,322
2,789,114
$12,053,402
Total
$127,1769342
Pagc43 & 13
CITY OF YUCAIPA , CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE CALCULATION
1. Inventory of Existing Public Facilities
Facility
Facility Units
Quantity
Buildings
Square Feet
76,200
Land
Acres
14.7 Vehicles
Vehicle
13.0 Equipment
Integrated Unit
1.0 11. Existing Public Facilities EDU Calculation
Residents per Unit/
Total
Number of
Number of Units/
Persons Served per
EDUs per Unit/
Number o
Land Use Type
Persons Served
Non -Res 1,000 SF
1,000 Non -Res. SF
per 1,000 Non -Res SF
EDUs
Residential
55,890
20,247
2.76 1.00
20,247
Subtotal Residential
55,890
20,247
20,247
Commercial
2,014
2,014,054
1.00 0.36
730
Industrial
458
610,886
0.75 0.27
166
Subtotal Non-residential
2,472
2,624,940
NA
NA
896
Total
58,362
21,143
Ill. Existing Facility
Standard
Facility Units per
Facility Type
Facility Units
Quantity
1,000 Persons Served
Buildings
Square Feet
76,200
1,305.64
Land
Acres
14.7 0.252
Vehicles
Vehicle
13 0.223
Equipment
Integrated Unit
1 0.017
IV. Future Public Facilities EDU Calculation
Residents per Unit/
Total
Number of
Number of Units/
Persons Served per
EDUs per Unit/
Number o
Land Use Type
Persons Served
Non -Res 1,000 SF
1,000 Non -Res. SF
per 1,000 Non -Res SF
EDUs
Residential
27,135
9,830
2.76 1.00
9,830
Subtotal Residential
27,135
9,830
9,830
Commercial
4,186
4,185,946
1.00 0.36
1,516
Industrial
2,092
2,789,114
0.75 0.27
758
Subtotal Non -Residential
6,278
6,975,060
NA
NA
2,274
Total
33,413
NA
NA
12,104
V. Future Facility Standard
Facility Units
Facilities Units Funded
Facility Type
Facility Units
per 1,000 Persons Served
by New Development
Buildings
Square Feet
1,306
43,625
Land
Acres
0.252
8.410
Vehicles
Vehicle
0.223
7.44 Equipment
Integrated Unit
0.017
0.573
PagAgf 13
CITY OF YUCAIPA , CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE CALCULATION
J. Public Facilities Summary Cost Data
Facility Units Funded
Total Facility Cost for
acility Type
Facility Units
by Future Development
Cost Per Unit
Future Development
Cost per ED1
Buildings
Square Feet
43,625
$531
$23,162,691
$1,913.61
Land
Acres
8.410
$302,389
$2,543,119
$210.1(
Vehicles
Vehicle
7.443
$15,531
$115,588
$9.5`
Equipment
Integrated Unit
0.573
$224,500
$128,527
$10.61
'otal
$25,949,926
$2,14�
few Development $ 25,949,921
dj. for PFF Grants $
otal Cost Allocated to New Development $ 25,949,921
let Cost per EDU $2,14,
Residential $0.95 9,830 $21,074,294
Commercial $777 4,185,946 $3,251,010
Industrial $582 2,789,114 $1,624,622
Residential $2,144 9,830 $21,074,294
Commercial $777 4,185,946 $3,251,010
Industrial $582 2,789,114 $1,624,622
Total $25.949.926
PagAlf 13
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
FIRE FEE CALCULATION
Inventory1. of
Facility
Facility Units
Quantity
Buildings
Square Feet
19,900
Land
Acres
5.2 Vehicles
Vehicle
16.0 Equipment
Integrated Unit
1.0 11. Existing Fire Facilities EDU Calculation
Land Use Type
Number of
Persons Served
Number of Units/
Non -Res 1,000 SF
es1 ents per m
Persons Served per
1,000 Non -Res. SF
EDUs per Unit/
per 1,000 Non -Res SF
Total
Number of EDUs
Residential
55,890
20,247
2.76 1.00
20,247
Subtotal Residential
55,890
20,247
NA
NA
20,247
Commercial
2,014
2,014,054
1.00 0.36
730
Industrial
458
610,886
0.75 0.27
166
Subtotal Non -Residential
2,472
2,624,940
896
Total
58,362
NA
NA
21,143
111. Existing Facility Standard
0 Facility Units per
Facility Type [31
Facility Units
Quantity
1,000 Persons Served
Buildings
Square Feet
19,900
341
Land
Acres
5.18 0.089
Vehicles
Vehicle
16 0.274
Equipment
Integrated Unit
1 0.017
IV. Future Fire Facilities EDU Calculation
esi en per m
Number of
Number of Units/
Persons Served per
EDUs per Unit/
Total
Land Use Type
Persons Served
Non -Res 1,000 SF
1,000 Non -Res. SF
per 1,000 Non -Res SF
Number of EDUs
Residential
27,135
9,830
2.76 1.00
9,830
Subtotal Residential
27,135
9,830
NA
NA
9,830
Commercial
4,186
4,185,946
1.00 0.36
1,516
Industrial
2,092
2,789,114
0.75 0.27
758
Subtotal Non -Residential
6,278
6,975,060
NA
NA
2,274
Total
33,413
NA
NA
12,104
PagA413
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
FIRE FEE CALCULATION
StandardIV. Future Facility
Facility Units
Facilities Units Funded
Facility Type
Facility Units
per 1,000 Persons Served
by New Development
Buildings
Square Feet
341
11,393
Land
Acres
0.089
2.966
Vehicles
Vehicle
0.274
9.160
Equipment
Integrated Unit
0.017
0.573
VI. General Fire Summary Cost Data
Facility Units Funded
Total Facility Cost for
Facility Type
Facility Units
by Future Development
Cost Per Unit
Future Development
Cost per EDU
Buildings
Square Feet
11,393
$1,000
$11,392,824
$941
Land
Acres
2.966
$302,389
$896,757
$74
Vehicles
Vehicle
9.160
$313,750
$2,873,969
$237
Equipment
Integrated Unit
0.573
$250,000
$143,126
$12
Total
$15,306,675
$1,265
New Development $ 15,306,675
Adj. for PFF Grants $
Total Cost Allocated to New Development $ 15,306,675
Net Cost per EDU $1,265
50.56 9,830 $12,430,763
$458 4,185,946 $1,917,622
$344 2,789,114 $958,290
Residential $1,265 9,830 $12,430,763
Commercial 5458 4,185,946 $1,917,622
Industrial 5344 2,789,114 $958,290
Total $15,306,675
PagAZf 13
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
PARKS FEE CALCULATION
Acres per 1,000 Residents
3.50 Land Use Type
Proposed Residenti,
Facility Standard (
Acres per Resident
0.0035
Park Acres Required
per Unit
Persons per Household
(Detached Dwellings
residents per Unit)
2.76 Number of Units
Total Number of Park
Acres Required
Residential 0.00966 9,830 94.97
Total NA 9,830 94.97
Allocation to New Development
Total Allocated to New Development
Adj. for PFF Grants
Net Allocated to New Development
Cost Per Unit
100%
$34,471,122
($4,050,000)
$30,421,122
Page4S,bf 13
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
PARKS FEE CALCULATION
Page44Jbf 13
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
STORM DRAIN FEE CALCULATION
Units / Sq. Ft.
Units per Acre / FAR
Developed Acreag,
Residential
20,247
2.582
7,843
Commercial
2,014,054
0.476
97.2 Industrial
610,886
0.285
49.3 Total
7,989
[1] Based on Acreage information provided by City
Land Use Category
Runoff Rate
Coefficient "C" [ 1 ]
Developed Acreage
Current
Total Unit Runoff
Residential
0.50 7,843
3,921
Commercial
0.83 97
80 Industrial
0.83 49.3
40.7 Total
7.989
4.042
[ 1 ] Source: Caltrans Highway Design Manual (pg. 28). Residential -Midpoint of Single Family areas. Commercial -midpoint of Downtown Areas. Industrial -midpoint of light and heavy areas.
111. Future EBU Calculation
Land Use Category
Units /Sq ft.
Units per Acre / FAR
Developed Acreage
Residential
9,830
2.582
3,808
Commercial
4,185,946
0.476
202.0
Industrial
2,789,114
0.285
225.0
Total
4.235
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
STORM DRAIN FEE CALCULATION
Land Use Category
Runoff Rate
Coefficient "C"
Developed Acreage
Future
Total Unit Runoff
Residential
0.50 3,808
1,904
Commercial
0.83 202
167
Industrial
0.83 225.0
185.6
Total
4.235
2.256
New Development
Facility Facility Costs
Storm Drain Facilities City $ 306,022,301.76
Offsetting Revenue (Grants/General
Fund Contributions) -
Total $ 306,022,301.76
Allocation of i Existing and New Development b.sed on TiRunoff) Allocation by
Land Use Category Total Unit Runoff (EBUs) Percentage New Development Costs Existing Development 4,042 64.18% $196,402,571
New Development 2,256 35.82% $109,619,731
Total 6,298 100.00% $306,022,302
Page Wof 13
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
STORM DRAIN FEE CALCULATION
V. Proposed Facilities
New Development
Facility Facility Costs
Storm Drain Facilities City $ 109,619,731
Offsetting Revenues (DIF Expenditure /
Cash on Hand / Deferrals) $ (67,978,178.00)
Total $ 41,641,553
Overall
Cost Per Unit Runoff
$18,457
FinancedV1. Storm Drainage Impact Fees and Cost
by Fees per Acre
Cost Per Unit Runoff
Runoff Rate
Allocation Rate
Land Use Category
Coefficient "C"
per Acre
Cost Financed
Residential
0.50 $9,228
$107,517,316
Commercial
0.83 $15,227
$4,555,773
Industrial
0.83 $15,227
$41176,455
Total
$116,249,545
Page hoof 13
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
STORM DRAIN FEE CALCULATION
Residential
$1.58 9,830 $35,139,649
Commercial
$15,227 202.0 $3,075,842
Industrial
$15,227 225.0 $3,426,062
Total
$41,641,553
Residential $3,575 9,830.0 $35,139,649
Commercial $15,227 202.0 $3,075,842
Industrial $15,227 225.0 $3,426,062
Total $41,641,553
APPENDIX B
City of Yucaipa
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
INVENTORY AND
FACILITIES NEEDS
LIST
490
CITY OF YUCAIPA
TRAFFIC FEE ASSUMPTIONS
Trip Rate Input Table Average Daily Trips Notes
One 1 EDU 9.44
Vehicle Type
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
PCE
Passenger Vehicles
100.0%
97.0%
65.0%
1.00 2-Axle Trucks
0.0%
1.0%
5.0%
1.50 3-Axle Trucks
0.0%
1.0%
5.0%
2.00 4+ Axle Trucks
0.0%
1.0%
25.0%
3.00 Total
100%
100%
100%
NA
Adjustment Factor:
Cost Index Adjustment 5.70%
Transportation Facilities Costs $321,310,256
Offsetting Revenues (Grants/Non-DIF funds)-$96,076,645 <_ Offsetting Revenues Cash on Hand-$4,000,000 <_
Only Grants/Outside Funding should be applied here.
Only unspent fund should be applied here.
PagM 14
CITY OF YUCAIPA
TRAFFIC FEE ASSUMPTIONS
Facility Narne
Base Cost for Facility
Inflation Adjusted Cost
Policy Background or Objective
5th Street - Oak Glen Road to Peach Tree Drive
$3,203,843
$3,386,462
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
5th Street - Peach Tree Drive to Yucaipa Boulevard
$565,044
$597,252
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
5th Street - Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E
$1,970,471
$2,082,788
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
5th Street - Avenue E to Wild-W Canyon Road
$2,969,186
$3,138,430
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
5th Street - Wildwood Canyon Road to Avenue H
$1,621,416
$1,713,837
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
5th Street - Avenue H to County Line Road
$1,614,125
$1,706,130
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
141h Street - Campus Way to Oak Glen Road
$8,204,233
$8,671,874
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Crafton Hills College Village Road - Yucaipa Boulevard to Sanyon Canyon Road $707,140
$747,447
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Crafton Hills College Village Road - Yucaipa Boulevard to Sanyon Canyon Road $223,445
$236,181
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 141h Street to 13th Street
$1,259,585
$1,331,382
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 131h Street to 12th Street
$806,961
$852,958
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 121h Street to Oak Glen Road
$2,904,009
$3,069,537
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - Oak Glen Road to 8th Street
$6,417,589
$6,783,392
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 8th Street to 7th Street
$3,410,586
$3,604,989
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 7th Street to 6th Street
$2,029,845
$2,145,546
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 6th Street to 5th Street
$1,313,230
$1,388,084
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 5th Street to 4th Street
$1,635,730
$1,728,967
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 4th Street to 2nd Street
$2,083,847
$2,202,627
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 2nd Street to California Street
$734,500
$776,366
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - California Street to Bryant Street
$684,310
$723,315
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - Roundabout at 3rd and 2nd
$3,010,681
$3,182,290
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - North City Limits to Topaz Street
$544,101
$575,114
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Topaz Street to Carter Street
$3,135,213
$3,313,920
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Carter Steet to Bryant Street
$479,269
$506,587
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Bryant Court to Oak Glen Road
$554,733
$586,352
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Oak Glen Road to Date Street
$949,159
$1,003,261
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Date Street to Yucaipa Boulevard
$295,460
$312,301
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E
$2,680,873
$2,833,683
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Avenue E to Sunlight Drive
$2,367,892
$2,502,862
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Sunlight Drive to Wildwood Canyon Road
$685,523
$724,597
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Wildwood Canyon Road to Avenue H
$4,629,704
$4,893,598
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Avenue H to County Line Road
$807,635
$853,670
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
California Street - Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue D
$839,206
$887,041
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
California Street - Avenue D to Avenue E
$170,286
$179,992
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
California Street - Avenue E to Wildwood Canyon Road
$2,294,804
$2,425,608
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
California Street - Wildwood Canyon Road to Avenue H
$0
$0
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
California Street - Avenue H to County Line Road
$1,283,748
$1,356,922
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Calimesa Boulevard - Oak Glen road to County Line Road
$4,875,652
$5,153,564
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Road - I-10 WB Ramps to Calimesa Boulevard
$654,534
$691,842
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Road - Calimesa Boulevard to 5th Street
$666,971
$704,988
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Road - 5th Street to 4th Street
$824,606
$871,608
Capital hmprovement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Road - 4th Street to 3rd Street
$266,493
$281,683
Capital hmprovement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Road - 3rd Street to California Street
$1,254,057
$1,325,538
Capital hmprovement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Road - California Street to Bryant Street
$466,262
$492,839
Capital hmprovement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Road - Casa Blanca Avenue to Bryant Street
$1,744,484
$1,843,919
Capital hnprovemeat Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Road - Bryant Street to 2nd Street
$3,539,633
$3,741,392
Capital hmprovement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Road - 2nd Street to Yucaipa Boulevard
$8,936,414
$9,445,790
Capital hmprovement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Road - Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue D
$1,273,186
$1,345,758
Capital hnprovemeat Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Road - Avenue D to Avenue E
$1,127,540
$1,191,810
Capital hmprovement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Road - Avenue E to Colorado Street
$4,619,007
$4,882,291
Capital hmprovement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Road - Colorado Street to Outer Highway 10
$22,274,171
$23,543,798
Capital hmprovement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - Outer Highway 10 So to Calimma Boulevard $107,917,419
$114,068,712
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - Cahmesa Boulevard East of 9th Street $1,491,418
$1,576,428
Capital hmprovement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - Fast of 9th Street to Colorado Street $1,726,492
$1,824,902
Capital hmprovement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - 5th Street to Colorado Street
$2,292,689
$2,423,372
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - 3rd Street to 5th Street
$1,965,036
$2,077,043
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - California Street to 3rd Street
$1,956,150
$2,067,650
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
PagM 14
CITY OF YUCAIPA
TRAFFIC FEE ASSUMPTIONS
Wildwood Canyon Road - Bryant Street to California Street $1,466,819
$1,550,428
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - Mesa Grande Drive to Bryant Street $3,906,739
S4,129,424
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - Freeway Entrance to Avenue E
$2,564,883
$2,711,082
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - Avenue E to 17th Street
$14,175,601
$14,983,610
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 17th Street to 16th Street
$2,944,825
$3, 112,680
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 16th Street to 15th Street
$4,529,763
$4,787,959
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 15th Street to 12th Street
$9,559,735
$10,104,640
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 12th Street to loth Street
$5,588,100
$5,906,622
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 10th Street to Oak Glen Road
$2,206,687
$2,332,468
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - Oak Glen Road to 7th Street
$3,255,212
$3,440,760
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 7th Street to 5th Street
$4,518,835
S4,776,408
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 5th Street to 4th Street
$836,903
$884,607
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 4th Street to 3rd Street
$869,508
$919,070
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 3rd Street to 2nd Street
$849,656
$898,086
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 2nd Street to Bryant Street
$288, 146
$304,571
Capital Lnprovement Plan -Engineering Division
Oak Hills Parkway
$7,462,207
$7,887,553
Capital Improvement Plan -Engineering Division
Transportation Facilities Subtotal $ 303,983,213 $ 321,310,256 Pagc 02 14
CITY OF YUCAIPA
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE ASSUMPTIONS
Building (Sq. Ft.)
Total Cost
$40,458,587
Unit Basis
Sq. Ft.
TotalSummary
Unit
76,200
$531 [
Land (Acres)
$4,442,101
Acres
15 $302,389 [
Vehicles (Number)
$201,900
Number
13 $15,531 [
Equipment
$224,500
Integrated Units
1 $224,500 [
Total
$45,327,088
NA
NA
NA
[1] Existing inventory in Public Facilities Buildings in square feet and the current price per square foot [2] Price determined by existing inventory of undeveloped land (preferably with sales per acre price for the last 5-years [3] Existing inventory of Equipment of vehicles and their costs used in Public Facilities [4] Existing inventory of Equipment used Public Facilities Offsetting Revnue (Grants/General Fund Contributions) $0 Rnildinus
Address (Sn_ Ft-1 COO / Sn_ Ft_ Value 111
Civic Center
34272 Yucaipa Blvd
25,000
$9,336,688
Maintenance Yard
35111 Oak Glen Road
13,000
$2,583,429
Swimming Pool
$0
Police Station
34144 Yucaipa Blvd.
22,000
$11,865,812
Library Center (Pending)
12040 5th St
0 $0
Performing Arts Center
12062 California St.
16,200
$16,672,658
Total 76,200 $531 $40,458,587
[1] Source: City data
Land Address (Acres) Cost / Acre III Value
Civic Center
34272 Yucaipa Blvd
4.7 $302,389
$1,421,230
Maintenance Yard
35111 Oak Glen Road
3.23 $302,389
$976,718
Swimming Pool
0 $302,389
$0
Police Station
34144 Yucaipa Blvd.
2.24 $302,389
$677,352
Library Center
12040 5th St
1.6 $302,389
$483,823
Performing Arts Center
12062 California St.
2.92 $302,389
$882,977
Total 14.69
[1] Land value of $30Z 389 per acre per Costar undeveloped land inventory of 31 properties. 4,442,101
PageOk 14
CITY OF YUCAIPA
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE ASSUMPTIONS
Equipment & Property
Quantity
Value
Street Sweeper
1 $4,500
Loader
1 $55,000
Backhoe
1 $25,000
Skid Steer
1 $8,500
Skip Loader
1 $8,000
Sikid Steer Breaker
1 $3,500
IT Equipment - Computers
100
$100,000
IT Equipment - Phones
100
$20,000
Total
[1] Source: City data
Vehicles
$224,500
Units Year Cost per Unit Total Costs
Ford Explorer - CM
1 2018
$17,500
$17,500
Chevy Colorado - PW
1 2016
$14,400
$14,400
Chevy Colorado - PW
1 2018
$17,000
$17,000
Ford F150 - Street
1 2016
$17,000
$17,000
Ford F250 - Street
1 2014
$16,000
$16,000
Ford F550 Flatbed - Street
1 2001
$8,000
$8,000
Ford F750 Bucket - Street
1 2000
$5,500
$5,500
Ford F450 Flatbed - Street
1 1999
$4,500
$4,500
Chevy 1500 - PW
1 2017
$21,000
$21,000
Chevy 1500 - PW
1 2017
$21,000
$21,000
Chevy Colorado - Code
1 2020
$19,000
$19,000
Chevy Colorado - Code
1 2020
$19,000
$19,000
Chevy Colorado - Code
1 2021
$22,000
$22,000
Total
[1] Source: City data
13 NA NA $201,900
Page49�f 14
CITY OF YUCAIPA
FIRE FEE ASSUMPTIONS
Building (Sq. Ft.)
$19,900,000
Sq. Ft. 19,900
$1,000
[11
Land (Acres)
$1,566,377
Acres 5
$302,389
[21
Vehicles (Number)
$5,020,000
Number 16
$313,750
[31
Equipment
$250,000
Integrated Units 1
$250,000
[4]
[1] Existing inventory in Public Facilities Buildings in square feet and the currentprice per square foot [21 Price determined by existing inventory of undeveloped land (preferably with sales per acre price for the last 5-years [3] Existing inventory of Equipment of vehicles and their costs used in Public Facilities [4] Existing inventory of Equipment used Public Facilities Offsetting Revenue (Grants/General Fund Contributions) $0
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
FIRE FACILITIES INVENTORY
Buildings Address (So. Ft.) Unit Cost / So. Ft. Ill Value Bryant Street Fire Station
11416 Bryant Street
7,300
$1,000
$7,300,000
Crafton Hills Fire Station
35664 Yucaipa Blvd
5,300
$1,000
$5,300,000
Wildwood Fire Station
1259 Wildwood Canyon Roy
7,300
$1,000
$7,300,000
Oakglen
Unstaffed
$0
19,900 $ l 9,900,000
[1] Source: City data
Pagc4"f 14
CITY OF YUCAIPA
FIRE FEE ASSUMPTIONS
Land Address (Acres) Unit Cost / Acre III Value
Bryant Street Fire Station
11416 Bryant Street
2.51 $302,389
$758,998
Crafton Hills Fire Station
35664 Yucaipa Blvd
0.75 $302,389
$226,792
Wildwood Fire Station
34259 Wildwood Canyon
Road
1.92 $302,389
$580,588
Oakglen
Unstaffed
-
Total 5.18 $1,566,377
[1] Land value of $302,389 per acre per CoStar undeveloped land inventory of 31 properties.
Pagc49-6f 14
CITY OF YUCAIPA
FIRE FEE ASSUMPTIONS
Vehicles
Type of Vehicle Make Units III
Cost
Paramedic Engine 551
1 $750,000
$750,000
Reserve Engine 551A
1 $350,000
$350,000
CAL FIRE Engines 3551
1 $75,000
$75,000
CAL FIRE Engines 3569
1 Paramedic Engine 552
1 $750,000
$750,000
Brush Engine 552
1 $350,000
$350,000
Reserve Engine 552A
1 Paramedic Engine 553
1 $750,000
$750,000
Reserve Engine 553A
1 $350,000
$350,000
Medic Engine 553
1 $50,000
$50,000
Battalion Engine 3513
1 $120,000
$120,000
Brush Engine 555
1 $450,000
$450,000
Brush Patrol 555
1 $350,000
$350,000
Water Tender 555
1 $300,000
$300,000
Future - Ladder
Future - Medic/Paramedic
1 $275,000
$275,000
Future - Medic/Paramedic reserve
1 $100,000
$100,000
Total
[1] Source: City data
16 5,020,000 $5,020,000
Page*bf 14
CITY OF YUCAIPA
FIRE FEE ASSUMPTIONS
Equipment & Property Quanity Cost per Unit Cost [1]
Station Equipment $250,000
Total
[1] Source: City data
$250,000
Pagc4"f 14
CITY OF YUCAIPA
FIRE FEE ASSUMPTIONS
Land
TotalSummary i
$141,143,306
Basis
Acres
466.76
$302,389
Property / Structure / Equipment
$28,194,012
Acres
466.76
$60,404
Vehicles
$78,000
Acres
466.76
$167
Total
$169,415,318
NA
NA
$362,960
Summary Per Acre
Land Aquisition $302,389
Park Development $60,571
Total $362,960
U
s]
[1] Undeveloped land vaue & the number of total park acres that the City owns [2] Total property, structures and equipment for the City parks [3] Number of vehicles and their respective prices
[4] Price determined by existing inventory of undeveloped land (preferably with sales per acre price for the last 5-years [5] Total property, structures and equipment and vehicles for the City parks / number of acres StandardPark III Residents
General Plan Standard 3.50
Current Standard 8.35
Standard Utilized For Study (Minimum) 3.50
Offsetting Revnue (Grants/General Fund Contributions) $4,050,000 Page Mof 14
CITY OF YUCAIPA
FIRE FEE ASSUMPTIONS
Land Inventory
Address (Acres) Cost / Acre Value
John Tooker Civic Park
34272 Yucaipa Blvd, Yucaipa, CA 92399
0.5 $302,389
$151,195
Seventh Street Park
12385 7th St, Yucaipa, CA 92399
13.5 $302,389
$4,082,258
Crafton Hills Aquatics Center (Not a City Facility)
11711 Sand Canyon Rd, Yucaipa, CA 92399
13th Street Sports Complex
11928 Yucaipa Blvd Yucaipa CA 92399
29.8 $302,389
$9,011,206
Crafton Hills Park
33570 Brandon Rd, Yucaipa, CA 92399
2.49 $302,389
$752,950
Yucaipa Regional Park (Not a City Facility)
33900 Oak Glen Road, Yucaipa, CA 92399
Yucaipa Community Park
34900 Oak Glen Rd, Yucaipa, CA 92399
31.1 $302,389
$9,404,312
Yucaipa Community Center
34900 Oak Glen Road
1.2 $302,389
$362,867
Bryant Glen Complex
11092 Sunnyside Dr, Yucaipa, CA 92399
13.3 $302,389
$4,021,780
El Dorado Ranch Park
37186-, 37254 Oak Glen Rd, Yucaipa, CA 92399
334
$302,389
$100,998,081
Flag Hill Veterans Memorial Park
12080 Fremont Yucaipa Ca 92399
7.8 $302,389
$2,358,638
Wildwood Canyon (Not a City Facility)
12241 Canyon Drive Yucaipa Ca 92399
Wildwood Park
36699 Wildwood Canyon Rd, Yucaipa, CA 92399
12.9 $302,389
$3,900,824
Avenue I Park
34130 Ave I Yucaipa Ca 92399
10.3 $302,389
$3,114,611
Yucaipa Equestrian Center
13273 Califirnia St Yucaipa Ca 92399
7.2 $302,389
$2,177,204
Avenue A Park
Ave A Yucaipa Ca 92399
0.5 $302,389
$151,195
Center Park
35015 Avenue B Yucaipa Ca 92399
1 $302,389
$302,389
Scherer Senior Center
12202 1st Street Yucaipa Ca 92399
0.67 $302,389
$202,601
Lilian Eaton Park
34282 Yucaipa Blvd, Yucaipa, CA 92399
0.5 $302,389
$151,195
En
Total
* * * Ignore the Parks that ar not city Facilities
466.76 $141,143,306
CITY OF YUCAIPA
FIRE FEE ASSUMPTIONS
Vehicles
Model Year Cost
Chevy
Colorado
2016
12,700
Ford
F150
2015
16,300
Chevy
Colorado
2018
19,000
Ford
Exploer
2014
10,000
Chevy
Colorado
2018
$20,000
Total
Property / Structures / Equipment
5.0 $78,000
Total
Playground Equipment
$340,086
Landscaping/Irrigation
$1,026,636
Additional Parking
$542,650
Security Lighting
$146,662
Restrooms
$879,972
Sidewalks/Trails
$586,650
Picnic Areas
$586,650
Playfield Lighting
$733,310
Building Expansion
$439,986
Drainage Improvements
$366,657
Signage
$26,399
Uptown Park W/Shade Structure
$2,692,559
Dunlap Park
$7,493,980
5-Winds Park
$8,000,000
Oak Glen Park
$1,021,500
Oak Glen Creek Park
$1,137,920
Crafton Hills Tennis Complex
$2,172,393
$28,194,012
Page IT -of 14
CITY OF YUCAIPA
STORM DRAIN FEE ASSUMPTIONS
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
2.58 0.5000
0.48 0.8250
0.28 0.8250
Cost Index Adjustment 5.70%
Facilities Costs $306,022,302
Offsetting Revenues (DIF Cash on Hand / Deferrals) $0
Offsetting Revenues (DIF Expenditures)-$67,978,178
Offsetting Revnue (Grants/General Fund Contributions) $0 Chicken Springs Wash Station 0+000000 to 20+95
$4,633,993
$4,898,131
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Chicken Springs Wash Station 20+95 to 31+20
$2,270,917
$2,400,359
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Chicken Springs Wash Station 31+20 to 51+70
$4,242,646
$4,484,477
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Chicken Springs Wash Station 51+70 to 65+60
$3,342,335
$3,532,848
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Chicken Springs Wash Station 65+60 to 78+90
$3,297,821
$3,485,797
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Chicken Springs Wash Station 78+90 to 91+95
$2,393,325
$2,529,745
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Chicken Springs Wash Station 91+95 to 106+31
$2,598,841
$2,746,975
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Chicken Springs Wash Station 106+31 to 124+94
$3,103,546
$3,280,448
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Drain Station 0+00 to 31+62 (72" RCP & 84" RCP) $4,025,438
$4,254,888
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Drain Station 0+00 to 4+86 (84" RCP)
$496,290
$524,579
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 0+00 to 15+50
$1,974,178
$2,086,706
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 15+50 to 21+00
$210,903
$222,924
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 21+00 to 34+65
$866,711
$916,114
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 34+65 to 47+90
$603,601
$638,006
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 47+90 to 55+10
$477,995
$505,241
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 10+00 to 13+03.18 (36" RCP)
$235,288
$248,699
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 10+00 to 42+19.70 (Ave E West 54", 60" $ 66" RCP) $3,377,613
$3,570,137
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 10+00 to 14+21.68 (Ave E East 36" RCP) $327,253
$345,906
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel 10+00 to 37+38.27 (Kentucky St West 60" RCP) $2,815,818
$2,976,320
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel 10+00 to 13+94.46 (Kentucky St East 36" RCP) $240,935
$254,668
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Station 0+00 to 60+00
$16,094,265
$17,011,638
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 0+00 to 62+70
$16,205,273
$17,128,974
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 62+70 to 97+05
$8,391,544
$8,869,862
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 97+05 to 120+22
$7,003,652
$7,402,860
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
PageWof 14
CITY OF YUCAIPA
STORM DRAIN FEE ASSUMPTIONS
Wildwood Creek 120+22 to 147+22
$7,936,093
$8,388,450
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 147+22 to 169+76
$5,668,734
$5,991,852
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwod Creek Station 0+00 to 46+14
$9,176,792
$9,699,869
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 46+14 to 62+10.
$5,813,664
$6,145,043
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 62+10 to 85+10
$6,010,880
$6,353,500
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 85+10 to 107+12
$12,541,576
$13,256,446
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 107+12 to 137+49
$6,694,098
$7,075,662
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 137+49 to 150+21
$3,736,847
$3,949,847
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 150+21 to 172+63
$4,347,507
$4,595,315
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 172+63 to 207+93
$6,716,225
$7,099,050
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 0+00 to 03+50 (48' RCP)
$159,203
$168,278
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 0+00 to 48+01
$18,239,077
$19,278,704
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 48+01 to 66+78
$5,410,391
$5,718,783
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 66+78 to 90+25
$5,113,658
$5,405,137
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
wilson Creek Station 90+25 to 131+92
$12,713,021
$13,437,663
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 131+92 to 174+26
$22,189,825
$23,454,645
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 174+26 to 199+53
$10,941,024
$11,564,662
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 199+53 to 222+58
$7,866,948
$8,315,364
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 222+58 to 247+72
$9,792,117
$10,350,268
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 247+72 to 268+77
$3,723,532
$3,935,773
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 268+77 to 286+69
$15,442,689
$16,322,922
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 286+69 to 304+51
$3,395,801
$3,589,362
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 0+00 to 3+65 (84" RCP)
$331,022
$349,890
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 3+65 to 21+61 (72" RCP)
$1,419,901
$1,500,835
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 0+00 to 9+93 (48" RCP)
$530,557
$560,799
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 0+00 to 1+50 (RCP Fremont Crossing) $861,552
$910,660
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Creek Station 0+00 to 64+30
$9,035,518
$9,550,543
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Creek Station 64+30 to 78+89
$2,502,026
$2,644,641
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Creek Station 78+89 to 108+74
$1,979,221
$2,092,037
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Storm Drainage Subtotal $ 289,519,680 $ 306,022,301.76
PageiUODf 14
www.FinanceDTA.com
100 BAYVIEW CIRCLE, SUITE 100
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
PHONE: (800) 969-4DTA
Public Finance
Public -Private Partnerships
Development Economics
Clean Energy Bonds
City of Yucaipa
FY 2022-2023 Drainage Grant Funding
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
FUND
SOURCE
GRANT (REIMS.
AM71
FEOERPL
GRAM (REIMB.
AMT)
STATE
SBCFCD FUNDING
CONMISUYION
ADD
FUNDING
NOTES
ORi03INAL
LOCAL
MATCH
TOTAL
GRANTlLOAN
AMOUNT
LIKELIKOCO
OF
OBTAINING
G1SCCVNTED
AMOUNT
Ne C I 1
When III B-WOek Glen CK SP
DWR-I4 Mm.as I60,000
s7,6Ao,DDO
5777,ODO
5206,000
S154.0001
S133,000
SHO,OW
31,8DO,DW
S277.000i
80%
60%
60%
80%
$106,41)0
S526,000
51,080,W0
3221,0DD
Pendlemn Are LwC
HBP
$7,eti7,000
5250000
01 S7,997,D20
S0%
S4,780.200
Santa JNa Rirer d Tdhutaries
Erns slam Resrerafipn Prn eolAMyC.r0SI3CFQD
5561.000
S300000
S861,000
70%
56D2700
wrhon I Ecosysum Res[warien
Ar Co
E1lrmarkl3BCPCD
N.045,000
5529000
2 6
S+568,000
70%
s7,097.600
VA m III a--ADak GNn CK SP
�SSCMD
SBVMWO Ov1IW
$1,153,000
}
51,853,000 lw% $1 e53_ppO
Wd—pl
$8.153.00
1 4
_
153,W0 1M% SO 153.ODO
HAlson Is BaslnA]peGMn CK 3P
WSEerSmul 1A
5280.OW
1 5290,000 00% 5232,DOO
Wison Id BasiNOak Glen CK SP
W" III
Lesson 111
DWR {DWpyV1
Congresskne8y Direct
Spendmg
CARhWPe
51,WO,WO
$1,152,000
$750,000
(1]
S7 OM 80% S600,000
$1,000,WO 60% $600,o00
SI.+52000 70% $906,400
SuhloralE.I.RP
s20.407,ppO
36.976.000
6449,OOD
51.145.MD
$30991.000
s24,752,550
When Geek, 14lh le FlO f_
s307,Op0
$
S307W0
semom
100%
$307000
Wd4an Geek, Yuaipa Blvd! to +p91
Sheol
She DDD
+00%
5688000
131h Sheet LWC
52,076000
S$49797
$249.120
S2076-OW
IW%
6m Plaoe LWC
$2,734, $(A
S224 000
S2,734.W4
l00%
,076000
52.7s4 8&
Avanu4 D LWC
S+,888,OD0
S 745
s223,020
56D00
1W%
$1,6W.W0
Dusiep Chennel. Phow Il Avenue E
Slwm Drain
58x7,00D
5827900
1W%
5$M.000
DuNe Chennembw cm k
3501 000
01,0W
100%
S501 0W
IOIh Sheet LWC
$1,423000
$W 000
$1423000
100%
$1.423,OOD3NSVeeILWC
S14290W
5335000
$142600D
1W%
31,429,OWFCCrtenel$222NO
S222 ODO
100%
F222_W0
Duels Channel Pbas61
RDACa rte1
S6D1,W0
s801,000
lw%
S861.OW
wood Da[ mmn Sasln
SOCFCD
S1 457 WD
SI 457 OW
100%
s1,457,Op0
Wddrwod Detention Basin
PRIVATE
O00
$60,Wo
100%
NO.OW
VPit—d Deceeee4 Sash
SBVMW➢{Muni
SSs9,DOD
5SM.W0
100%
s5e9_opp
WiOnoed Dotention Basin
PDMGP
4OW
57 5r
5680,000
$1572 000
100%
S2,572,DOO
wism R
YvwD
$eDD.OW
5000.0 o
100%
s6D0.000
Wikon ll
SSCFCD
SI.864000
51,77'6,000
$18640W
100%
SI.BM.
Wison ll
EPA
S484000
$404.000
IGO%
S4B4,0D0
%N&an II _
P 13
_ s7.00D,000
_ _
31,000,000
100%
$1.00uODD
S27D,000
WdSue Il
IERCO
S270000
S27D.000
loos—
Su6taral
S7,260,DW
$1,000,000
s3.847.W0
S1.390,00
$3317,000
512.991,000
S21,990,964
Tnhd
$27.667.000
S5 00o 000
$12 317 000
$1.839.000
S4 402 000
UT 982 000
$46 743.414
r A.,..e.ox brr .aenraaoe. svz
arlN.r nesn:.
Rlad�wnwl�r.wa.wF...e+os+ r — ...
__pp
_
U l�wr RrE bd✓e
—
E.rN�a 1hF�
ko1 u ed
506
City of YUCalp a
FY 2022.2023 Tran 5 ponaiion Grant Fund Ing
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
FUND
SOURCE
GRANT
IREH4BllRSM ENT AMOUNT)
FEDERAL
ORANV
MIMBIIRSERENTAMOUNT}
STATE
Ho
COUNTY
REIMBURSEMEN
T
MEASUREI
OTHER
FUNDING
LOCAL
MATCH
TOTAL
GRANT
AMOUNT
UKELIHOOO
OF
OBTAINING
DISCOUNTED
AMOUNT
1 Sublalal
SQ
so
so
so
SO
SQ
artlei
--
--
Yucai 4Brsd Ina St 10 Sm St--�"
T17A
3150000
SJ 50,000
45%
3142500
Avenue E I manta 17F 511e Dunl Le asset
AOMO
322 floc
422.
9Q%
5191100
Aveue nE I en ams 17n 5110 Ounla Channel
rN
$e SR2S
s]aa rmD
gun."
um
S31] 200
Yucei a Bkd 1501 S! [v F1Q F N[erconne
MSRC
390.0oo
$80,000
900E
561 000
Cvun L'+1e Rd I Btty F10
M.— I
$S,035-000
55,035,000
95%
$4.703.250
Yud spry d_ 15N St k, I.1Q F
Meawre I
S
$6,9e3.000
5E,543,000
95% $6215.650
Avenue E Nlersecaons
Measure I
55.043-QW
55.043,000
75% 33,732,250
5th Sveet Sdewalk. Yusai 9lvd 1a Avenue E
Mea_ure I
51.1 9 000
S1,10RUO
00% S557,200
pax Glen Rd 4 2nd Street TWific SiOnd
HSIP
000
SS 0 W9
95%
5313 500
Dusty Unc Road, 41h Streelm Cdimeea BNd MSRC Projeat
MSRC
5360000
S40,50orm
SSeO 000
65%
33x3 000
wJdwood 1nHrchan a flee —t
Stearns I
11 S4Q, 000
75%
S30,375 No
Coup line Rd 51 Ie F10 F
1 SBB5.000
ID
33,35o,0a0
5685 DOQ
60%
$m8WO
GenerN Rrtedd Rem. '_ Belan[e
Meullal
6 H1900,000
911900000
90%
$1 VIO,No
Coun Une Read Ca .
LPP7d61
$1-sm.000
S1 86000
90-A517874Q0
Suvtetd
5330000
53.661,090
356230000
S11900000
d74121000
S60,281,950
DD
can use Rpta. 9rd Sear[ 4v C1L}vmla Svevt ATPPre va
ATP
$512.000
S512o0Q
100%
$512 000
uC1iVk BN 2nd St I45m 81to s01 SI
—--
AOMO
,
m,O1Q
10 _ 000
$129000
MSRC
$12DA0
100%
" 1.Bhd 15m 8t la F1Q
M
3B1
S394 0110
5394,t=
1DD%
S39i 000
c" 1BNd 15m Slm IN02
AOMD
S27000
$27,000
100%
527000
Sm Stress Sida YuehM " aBteA aE
COW6
]1000
5533,000
100%
6533000
" @ BNd IM 5vea1 m 16%Strvat
HSIP
S71&000
$716,000
100%
6716000
5m Strvat5ldewdk Yucd a9vd tvA—E
TDA
S3250W
$32S,000
-100%
5325000
SthStrsn SIdnmk Yucwpa B&dle Avenue E
mee l
QQQ
$55.000
1QC%
356.000
14 L__Bdd a
TCRP
$2,100000
$2"100000
100%
S2f00000
Avarwe E
XBP
_ 51.4]2.1]4
S969
4 5368074
$1432 134
100%
$1 432.134
B anl5eeel
XBP
4 5217.997
S36@
la"
SIM9,332
Ganerd Artedal v I
M—.I
$381.000
MI =
100%
$38%000
Generd ARe.d Y1Dr120110-0Mewr0I
Measure I
Sso4 000
5504 000
100%
5504.000
Lire OakrC M Glen kloerN a
TCRP
$0.425.000
$6425 000
100%
$a,425 DDD
Lire OakfO. Glen Nterehan a
Pmp 16
3697 Opp
SIROW
100%
5933 Doo
tart Oaklddt Mee y4erchan a
Measure I
$3KQ1M
s300,000
190%
5700000
tare O4kXi Glen a
-Nmd
51,255000
1 55,000
10oK
51255 000
WcmhM
We OakfOak r4ea Geefchan e l mvnts
v
Me-.. I
Measure I -PAR
y1300.0o0
$4,3o0,000
100%
S4.300.000
Lek Glen Rd. _Siyld kdarcannan
RTIP
3185000
i
163000
100%
St65GDD
Oek Glvn Rd Wrdenkk Y—W • Blvd Ia Avenue E
Oak pen Mdening 121W SL to B 5t
Mc enure I - PAA
Measure 1- PAR
31,T42.000
SN5000
St,242,
0 100%
We%
St N2 QOD
S320 o00
Oak pen N/ldonin 5d1 SL 105 Dr"
Federal5R2S
3310000
5890000
100%
3390 OOo
Tier 7 S 4 TfarAc Si d h6erconneG SANBAG
SANBRGPre 10
1 51,236,000
$1
Wddavod s 51h Street N[eraeeven
Mansura I - PIA
S545ODD
S4 .000
100%
S345 060
ere
Wedavod C Rvad l manes
LO 56m."
Sl
S1 NQ
100%
S172.OW
PSft
Wddxvod Inlarc131h
SKDPP
SB00.0p0
SS00 G00
1W5L
SBOO,000
S
Yucai a 9ilW 3 13015E Street TrafAc Si nd
RTIP
S1 000
4 S1 D00
_ _
f 07A
5150,000
Yuoai a BNd Seum Slde Sm 91. to 12M SL
BTA
S350p00
C00
1001E
$350 000
Yuoal a131rd Seum Slde Sm sL to 12m sh
Se SR29
i4D3.ODD
SIO] 000
100%
%Q3.000
Yuvei a 81vd Seum sloe Sm SL t0 12m SL
TDA
5970000
70 000
100%
%370 O00
Yueai .BNd (S.um side 5%Sh to 12%sh
Maaalra I-PAA
$1.ZW.75a
1 $1 4760
100%
3%224,75D
Yusal a BNd end 410 Ra wd.1
RTIP
32A00"p00
32"40D 000
100%
52 4Dp p00
Yu[si a BNd" f am SL !0 14tlr St
PrirMe
000
100%
000
Yu[ei a BNd 12dt SL !v 10pr SL
TOR
5410vo0
5410.000
$4
lopx
3410S100
5410 000
Yu_[ei _ee+a, 1201 SL tP 15m SL
P'
42 ii@7
5493,000
100%
SC 3,000
YyC4 a WN L 12tl1$L Ie 15th SL
M.— I
$
S4B5,000
1001A
S05.900
Yutwpa_Wd" 12N SL to 15015L
Yy 121h St ro 1501 SL
18 _
_ 550000
SSS9 W
1pp%
VAO. M
Laal3emWus
36 000
55WDD0
100%
SSSe 0 00
Yw W
,
$219.000
100%
$219.000
0. $307.000
1 %
sw.0p
1201514170151 S4O walk Yucai a Bhd to Ave E
Seale SR2S
3410 000
7 9
$410.oQ
100%
S41 000
lam Speer Sido- Wk Yucai a 04 to A—, E
CDBO
6145.000
SIAS.=
100%
S$43 000
eneaE _
Sim SR2S
340.01181
9 $40.000
100%
S440_000
Urn DakJOak 'Men IOkachan a Lmdft— Irw.
TEA
$550000
$560"000
100%
35KQDQ
SuhlvW
39276,464
$20.151,000
SB,312 T501
31,370,000
$100,000
5576.367
533,187"216
37 124 21E
Total
$1606 d66
f2S B12 000
$6E 542.750
ST3 7D ODO
5100 t]DD
$575.367
5107 32i6 08
$97,4t36,166
rl�a%Waa vlae.ad saz xaw R4NY1
aalyden CrFfnwlw eANwrN av I] a. s4ro-aary srlaNael Pru1 ]eta QTln�iel_pxMxdrak dF Hyyrn ma
rl�kdµ faasaannprpraf •_•hdF seanee4+laJglelaeM4xMk4ar
Me.anF mr rgn sew tan al ArAwa NNna Ys1 4..w'vE
Ii�gWEpeLW RgVttAewarwaN ww SdnR44 Patwswvpmi:Iresalwap sale
rfK70ir
dyo b4114aua1
rt lda triwOeea M4rwanaersenavr
Ia4blh Apldeeeil ernuk rwtrr sAllAG.sv /arnnamaaM
erarlw fm ynwamnIffitF
dLJmvarnw 14ea cuM
50/
2002 - 2022
Capital Improvement Program Project Funding Sources
Development Impact
Fee Program,
Measure-1, Solid Waste _$31,222,231
Franchise Fee, General Redevelopment Agency
Fund Loan, Developer S9,B17,000
Contribution &
Donation, S50,547,550__
General Fund,
S7.604.246
/ Agency Partnerships,
Parks Capital l _ $22,797,517
Roplacement Fund,_,
53,510,000
State Grants,_// +'- 49
$43.314,165 Federal Grants,
$37.573.238
Total $2 11, 579,947
508
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-64
EXHIBIT "A"
SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES EFFECTIVE 12-10-21
SUMMARY
DISTRIBUTION OF COST:
EXISTING AND FUTURE RESPONSIBILITY
DRAINAGE
TRAFFIC
PUBLIC FIRE
PARK
TOTAL
DISTRIBUTION OF COST
FACILITIES
FACILITIES
FACILITIES FACILITIES
FACILITIES
CHARGES
FUND ADJUSTMENTS
65,051,907
182,214,359
18,952,517 1,999,035
602,246
268,820,065
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
162,649,702
0 20,194,841 0
❑
182,844,543
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
62,071,599
121,101,910
16,622,909 12,304,989
27,591,766
239,693,173
TOTAL
289,773,208
303,316,269
55,770,268 14,304,024
28,194,012
691,357,781
SUMMARY OF IMPACT FEES BY SERVICE PROVISION
CHARGES PER DWELLING UNIT OR ACRE BY SERVICE
PROPOSED NET DWELLING
DRAINAGE
TRAFFIC
PUBLIC FIRE
PARK
TOTAL
LAND USE ACREAGE UNITS
FACILITIES
FACILITIES
FACILITIES FACILITIES
FACILITIES
CHARGES
RESIDENTIAL 3,745 9,668
3,415.85
10,434,20
1,444,62 916.21
2,998,78
19,209.66
Eqv DU 9,201
PER DU*
PER DU
PER DU PER DU
PER DU
PER DU*
COMMERCIAL 280
14,879.46
56,344.67
7,800.93 0.5331
-0-
87,097.83
PER AC
PER AC
PER AC PER SQ. FT.**
PER AC
INDUSTRIAL 147
14,879.46
63,403.72
7,800,93 0.5331
-0-
94,156.88
PER AC
PER AC
PER AC PER SQ. FT.**
PER AC
"NOTE: TYPICAL TOTAL ESTIMATED CHARGES PER DWELLING UNIT ARE BASED, FOR DRAINAGE, UPON A 10,000 SQ, FT. LOT SIZE. * * COM ME RCIAL/I N DUSTR IAL TOTAL CHARGES PER ACRE ARE BASED, FOR FIRE, UPON A 15,144 SQ. FT. BUILDING. 509
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-64
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF YUCAIPA
DRAINAGE FACILITIES FEE (OFF) - SCHEDULE OF FEES EFFECTIVE 12-10-21
PRIMARY SECONDARY
DRAINAGE DRAINAGE
DESCRIPTION
FACILITIES FACILITIES
Chicken Springs Wash
25,883,423
County Line Drain
4,521,729
Dunlap Channel
11,130,295
Oak Glen Creek
16,094,265
Wildwood Creek
100,402,087
Wilson Creek
117,971,116
Yucaipa Creek
13,516,764
❑FF Update
253,528
TOTAL 289,773,208
TOTAL
COST
25,883,423
4,521,729
11,130,295
16,094,265
100,402,087
117,971,116
13,516,764
253,528
289,773, 208
CONSTRUCTION NEEDS
RESULTING FROM
NEW DEVELOPMENT
PERCENT COST
43.87%
11,355,058
43.87%
1,983,682
43.97%
4,882,860
43.87%
7,060,554
43.87%
44,046,396
43.87%
51,753,929
43.87%
5,929,804
43.87%
111,223
4187% 127,123,506
CONSTRUCTION NEEDS
RESULTING FROM
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
PERCENT COST
56.13%
14,528,366
56.13%
2,538,046
5613%
6,247,435
56.13%
9,033,711
56.13%
56,355,692
5&13%
66,217,188
56.13%
7,586,960
56.13%
142,305
56.13% 162,649,702
ADJUSTMENT FOR OFF CASH ON HAND & DEFERRALS:
127,123,506 -
(2,926,270)
- 130,049,776
ADJUSTMENT FOR OFF EXPENDITURES & CREDITS:
130,049,776 -
67,978,178
= 62,071,599
ADJUSTMENT FOR OFF GRANTS:
162,649,702 -
43,956,014
= 118,693,688
ADJUSTMENT FOR GENERAL FUND CONTRIBUTIONS:
118,693,688 -
400,000
= 118,293,688
ALLOCATION OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES RESULTING FROM NEW DEVELOPMENT PROPOSE❑
NET
FEE PER
%OF
ALLOCATION
LAND USE
ACRES
ACRE
RESPONSIBILITY
OF COSTS
RESIDENTIAL
3,745
14,879,46
89364%
55,718,070
COMMERCIAL
280
14,879,46
6.712%
4,166,249
INDUSTRIAL
147
14,879,46
3.524%
2,187,281
TOTAL
4,172
100,000%
62,D71,599
510
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-64
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF YUCAIPA
TRAFFIC FACILITIES FEE (TFF) - SCHEDULE OF FEES EFFECTIVE 12-10-21
ESTIMATED
DESCRIPTION
COST
Yucaipa Blvd. Freeway Entrance to 5th St,
49,343,641
Yucaipa Blvd. 5th St. to 2nd St.
2,556,067
Yucaipa Blvd. 2nd St. to Bryant St.
288,146
County Line Rd. 1-10 WB On -Ramp to Call mesa Blvd.
654,534
County Line Rd. Calimesa Blvd. to Bryant St.
2,811,417
Oak Glen Rd. Outer Hwy 10 to Colorado St.
22,274,171
Oak Glen Rd. Colorado 5t. to Casa Blanca Ave.
21,240,265
Wildwood Canyon Rd. Outer Hwy 10 to Cali mesa Blvd.
107,917,419
Wildwood Canyon Rd. Calimesa Blvd. to Colorado St,
3,217,909
Wildwood Canyon Rd. Colorado St. to Mesa Grande Dr.
11,587,433
Oak Hills Parkway
7,462,207
Avenue E 14th St. to Bryant St.
26,290,873
Bryant St, City Limits to County Line Rd.
17,129,561
California St. Yucaipa Blvd. to County Line Rd.
4,588,071
Calimesa Blvd. Oak Glen Rd. to County Line Rd.
4,875,652
5th St. Oak Glen Rd. to County Line Rd.
11,944,085
14th St. Yucaipa Blvd. to Oak Glen Rd.
8,204,233
College Village Collector Yucaipa Blvd. to Sand Canyon Rd. 930,585
TOTAL 303,316,269
ADJUSTMENT FOR TFF CASH ON HAND & DEFERRALS: 303,316,269 - ADJUSTMENT FOR TFF EXPENDITURES & CREDITS: 299,270,263 - ADJUSTMENT FOR TFF GRANTS: 217,175,375 -
ALLOCATION OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR TRAFFIC FACILITIES RESULTING FROM NEW DEVELOPMENT:
NET EQV. TRIPS ADJ, TRIP
LAND USE ACRES UNITS PER EDU FACTOR GENERATION
RESIDENTIAL 3,745 9,201 10 1.0 92,010
COMMERCIAL 280 1,512 10 1.0 15,120
CONSTRUCTION NEEDS
CONSTRUCTION NEEDS
RESULTING FROM
RESULTING
FROM
NEW DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
PERCENT
COST
PERCENT COST
100.00%
49,343,641
0.00%
0 100.00%
2,556,067
0.00%
0 100.00%
288,146
0.00%
0 100.00%
654,534
0.00%
0 100,00%
2,911,417
0.00%
0 100.00%
22,274,171
0.00%
0 100,00%
21,240,265
0.00%
0 100.00%
107,917,419
0.00%
0 100.00%
3,217,909
0.00%
D
100.00%
11,587,433
0.00%
0 100,00%
7,462,207
0.00%
0 100.00%
26,290,873
0.00%
0 100.00%
17,129,561
0.00%
0 100.00%
4,588,071
0.00%
0 100.00%
4,875,652
0.00%
0 100.00%
11,944,085
0.00%
0 100.00%
8,204,233
0.00%
0 100.00%
930,585
0.00%
0 100.00%
303,316,269
0.00%
0 4,046,006
= 299,270,263
82,094,889
- 217,175,375
96,073,465
= 121,101,910
% RESPOW
ALLOCATION COST
FEE PER FEE PER
SIBILITY
OF COSTS PER TRIP
UNIT ACRE
79.28%
96,005,055
1043.42
10,434.20
13.03%
15,776,507
1043.42
56,344,67
INDUSTRIAL 147 794 10 1.1 8,933 7.70% 9,320,347 1043.42 63,403.72 TOTAL 4,172 11,507 116,063 100,000/0 121,101,910
NOTE: 5.4 EDU'S PER 1 ACRE OF COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL. 511
RESOLUTION NO, 2021-64
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF YUCAIPA
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE (PFF) -SCHEDULE OF FEES EFFECTIVE 12-10-21
CONSTRUCTION NEEDS
CONSTRUCTION NEEDS
RESULTING FROM
RESULTING FROM
TOTAL
NEW DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
DESCRIPTION COST
PERCENT
COST
PERCENT
COST
CIVIC CENTER 9,336,688
100.00%
9,336,688
0,00%
0 MAINTENANCE YARD 2,583,429
100.00%
2,583,429
0,00%
0 SWIMMING POOL 2,740,030
100.00%
2,740,030
0.00%
0 POLICE STATION 11,865,812
41.13%
4,880,409
58.87%
6,985,404
UBRARY/ED CENTER 12,571,650
52.67%
6,621,488
47.33%
5,950,162
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER 16,672,658
56.46%
9,413,383
43.54%
7,259,275
TOTAL 55,770,268
35,575,427
----------------------
20,194,841
ADJUSTMENT FOR PFF CASH ON HAND & DEFERRALS:
35,575,427 -
(6,848,987)
=
42,424,414
ADJUSTMENT FOR PFF EXPENDITURES & CREDITS:
42,424,414 -
19,251,504
=
23,172,909
ADJUSTMENT FOR PFF GRANTS:
23,172,909
6,550,000
=
16,622,909
ALLOCATION OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES RESULTING FROM NEW DEVELOPMENT:
EQUIVALENT
PROPOSE❑ NET DWELLING
DWELLING
%OF
ALLOCATION
COST
COST
LAND USE ACRES UNITS
UNITS
RESPONSIBILITY
OF COSTS
PER DU
PERACRE
RESIDENTIAL 3,745 9,668
9,201
79.96%
13,291,913
1,444.62
COMMERCIAL 290
1,512
13,14%
2,184, 260
7,800.93
INDUSTRIAL 147
794
6,90%
1,146,736
7,800,93
TOTAL 4,172 9,668
11,507
100,00%
16,622,909
NOTE: 5.4 EDU'S PER 1 ACRE OF COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL. 512
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-64
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF YUCAIPA
FIRE FACILITIES FEE (FFF)--SCHEDULE OF FEES EFFECTIVE 12-10-21
CURRENT
DESCRIPTION
FACILITY
LAND & SITE IMPROVEMENTS
212,354
FIRE ENGINE & EQUIPMENT (2)
1,064,511
FACILITY CONSTRUCTION
5,444,488
CONTINGENCY
128,783
TOTAL 6,850,135
ADJUSTMENT FOR FFF CASH ON HAND & DEFERRALS
ADJUSTMENT FOR FFF EXPENDITURES & CREDITS:
ADJUSTMENT FOR FFF GRANTS:
FUTURE
TOTAL
FACILITY
COST
276,183
488,537
1,089,345
2,153,856
5,410,735
10,855,222
677,626
806,409
7,453,888
14,304,024
14,304,024 -
-2,056,074
16,360,098 -
4,055,109
12,304,989 -
0 ALLOCATION OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR FIRE FACILITIES RESULTING FROM NEW DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION
DWELLING UNITS
9,668
ACRES
PROJECTED PEOPLE/HOUSEHOLD
2.75 ESTIMATED SQUARE FEET/ACRE
PROJECT FUTURE POPULATION
26,587
PROJECTED FUTURE SQUARE FEET
FACILITIES & EQUIPMENT NEEDED
FACILITIES & EQUIPMENT NEEDED
PER 9,000 PEOPLE
2.95 PER 5,625,000 5Q, FT.
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL COST
71.99%
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL COST
ALLOCATION OF TOTAL COST
8,857,915
ALLOCATION OF TOTAL COST
COST PER DWELLING UNIT
916.21
COST PER SQUARE FOOT
CONSTRUCTION NEEDS
CONSTRUCTION NEEDS
RESULTING FROM
RESULTING FROM
NEW DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
PERCENT
COST
PERCENT COST
100,00%
488,537
0.00% 0
100.000/0
2,153,856
0.00% 0
100.00%
10,855,222
0.00% 0
100.00%
806,409
100.00%
14,304,024
0.00% 0
= 16,360,098
= 12,304,989
= 12,304,989
427
15,144
6,466,489
1.15 28.01%
3,447,074
0.5331
513
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-64
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF YUCAIPA
PARK FACILITIES FEE (PKF) -SCHEDULE OF FEES EFFECTIVE 12-10-21
CONSTRUCTION NEEDS
CONSTRUCTION NEEDS
RESULTING FROM
RESULTING FROM
TOTAL
NEW DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
DESCRIPTION
COST
PERCENT
COST
PERCENT
COST
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT (4)
34QO86
100.00%
340,086
0.00%
0 LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION
1,026,636
100,00%
1,026,636
0.00%
0 ADDITIONAL PARKING
542,650
100.00%
542,650
0.00%
0 SECURITY LIGHTING (5)
146,662
100.00%
146,662
0.00%
0 RESTROOMS (3)
879,972
100.0D%
879,972
0.00%
0 SIDEWALKS/TRAILS
586,650
100.00%
586,650
0.00%
0 PICNIC AREAS (8)
586,650
100.00%
586,650
0,00%
0 PLAYFIELD LIGHTING (4)
733,310
100.00%
733,310
0.00%
0 BUILDING EXPANSION
439,986
100.00%
439,986
0.00%
0 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
366,657
100.00%
366,657
0.00%
0 SIGNAGE
26,399
100,00%
26,399
0.00%
0 UPTOWN PARK W/SHADE STRUCTURE
2,692,559
100.00%
2,692,559
0.00%
0 DUNLAP PARK
7,493,990
100.00%
7,493,980
0.00%
0 5-WINDS PARK
8,000,000
100.00%
8,000,000
0.00%
0 OAK GLEN PARK
1,021,500
100.00%
1,021,500
0.00%
0 OAK GLEN CREEK PARK
1,137,920
100.00%
1,137,920
0.00%
0 CRAFTON HILLS TENNIS COMPLEX
2,172,393
100,00%
2,172,393
0.00%
0 TOTAL
28,194,012
100.00%
28,194,012
0.00%
0 ADJUSTMENT FOR PKF CASH ON HAND & DEFERRALS:
28,194,012 -
-4,978,275
-
33,172,287
ADJUSTMENT FOR PKF EXPENDITURES & CREDITS:
33,172,287 -
1,530,521
=
31,641,766
ADJUSTMENT FOR PKF GRANTS:
31,641,766 -
4,050,000
=
27,591,766
PROPOSE❑ NET Equip. DWELLING
%
ALLOCATION
COST
LAND USE ACRES UNITS
RESPONSIBILITY
OF COSTS
PER DU
RESIDENTIAL 3,745 9,201
100.00%
27,591,766
2,998.78
TOTAL 3,745 9,201
100.00%
27,591,766
514