Agenda Item No. 5
CITY OF YUCAIPA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Fermin Preciado, City Engineer/Director of Development ServiceST? Landon Kern, Assistant City Engineer
Katrina Kunkel, Associate Engineer
FOR: City Council Meeting of January 22, 2024
SUBJECT: Resolution Establishing Speed Limits within the City of Yucaipa RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-01, establishing speed limits upon certain streets and segments of streets within the City of Yucaipa.
BACKGROUND:
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 require local agencies to conduct engineering and traffic surveys for speed limits on arterial and collector street segments once every five years, or seven years under certain circumstances where police officers have met specific training requirements, in order for speed limits to be enforced through the use of radar. Local streets, school zones and the Uptown District are exempt from the requirement as their speed limit is established by the CVC at 25 mph.
DISCUSSION:
At the March 13, 2023 City Council Meeting, as part of the FY 2023/2024 Pavement Management Program Update, the City Council approved a budget in the amount of $50,000 to complete the 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits (2023 Speed Survey) to comply with the CVC's five year requirement. Staff advertised a Request for Proposals/Qualifications (RFP/RFQ) for a traffic engineering firm to conduct a citywide engineering and traffic survey and prepare a report with speed limit recommendations. On September 25, 2023, the City Council awarded the contract to Minagar & Associates, Inc. (Minagar). Minagar has completed the Speed Survey and has prepared a report with their speed limit recommendations for the City Council's consideration.
It is important to note that the criteria used to determine and make recommendations for speed limits is consistent with the CVC and included reviewing site specific conditions such as
roadway geometry, roadway conditions, level of improvements (sidewalks, etc.), adjacent land uses, number of driveways and the number of speed related collisions in the previous five years.
The primary justification for speed limit recommendations per the CVC is based on the critical speed, or 851h percentile, defined as the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile for each street segment is included in the appendices of the 2023 Speed Survey.
The previous speed survey, completed in 2018, reviewed 94 street segments. Six additional street segments were included in the 2023 Speed Survey. These street segments were included in the current survey based on input from the Police Department, input received from residents through the City's Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program, and recommendations from Minagar to reduce some of the larger segments from the 2018 Speed Survey into smaller segments. By adding segments and extending the limits for several existing segments, staff can recommend more appropriate mitigation measures through the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program and the Police Department can enforce speeds and address speeding concerns in the community. The following six additional street segments were included in the 2023 Speed Survey:
Street
Segment Limits
Existing
Proposed Speed
Speed Limit
Limit
8th Street
Liberty Road to Avenue E (extended from
30 mph
No Change
Colorado Street to Liberty Road)
15th Street
Yucaipa Boulevard to Kentucky Street
35 mph
No Change
Avenue E
Split Segment — Yucaipa Boulevard to
35 mph
No Change
161h Street and 16th Street to Oak Glen
Road
Douglas Street
Avenue H to County Line Road
Not Posted
40 mph
Fremont Street
Oak Glen Road to Ivy Avenue (extended
25 mph
No Change
from Fremont Street to Ivy Avenue
Grape Avenue
Bryant Street to Holly Avenue
Not Posted
35 mph
The 2023 Speed Survey recommends that the current posted speed limit on many of the street segments remain the same. However, two street segments are being recommended for a 5 mph reduction to the posted speed limit, primarily due to traffic collision history associated with speeding and roadway conditions such as sight distance. Those street segments are as follows:
Street
Segment Limits
Existing Speed
Proposed Speed
Limit
Limit Reduction
Campus Drive
Sand Canyon Road to City Limit
35 mph
30 mph
Sand Canyon
North City Limit to Yucaipa Boulevard
50 mph
45 mph
Road
There is one segment being recommended for a 5 mph increase to the posted speed limit, primarily due to the speed data collected with this survey as well as the existing roadway conditions supporting the revised speed limit. The street segment is as follows:
Street
Segment Limits
Existing
Speed Limit
Proposed Speed
Limit Increase
Avenue E
California Street to Fremont Avenue
25 mph
25 mph to 30 mph
A complete summary of all findings is included in the attached 2023 Speed Survey. This document Survey also includes explanations justifying the proposed changes to existing speed limits.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact related to this proposed City Council action.
Attachments:
1. 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report for Speed Limits
2. Resolution No. 2024-01
Approved by:
ATTACHMENT 1
SLow� 2023 Citywide Engineering & Traffic
\, SPEED Survey(E&TS for Speed Limits
ENFORCEDBY
`
RADAR City of Yucaipa, CA
Proposed Posted Speed Limit
SPEED
LIMIT
45 I?
t
W AVE
jSchool Location
CRq AtiE
City Limits
CARTER Sr
COUNT}`
0 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
W
UNINCORPORATED
=
FIRAVE a
^
Z
�z
2 d
LL
W
�
ma
-
OAK GLEN RD
1 aQ�
4.yy�
�uNgD��Ir•
Rp
OP,LV
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
UNINCORPORATED
q�
11fitGHTS !
i
4^N
y4
� 6
DATE AVE
pP
F
N
YUCAIPA BLVD
TEIilEB�E
lr.�'\
F
C PAVEDr. ,N S
0 AVE E=
`LAPBLVO : -M'.i [1INCAVEE
w
w ~n W N
1~n N Q
Z
w
F
w
COLORA00S'
S
BELLAVISTADR
LL
CgC1y�F3q
d
CITY OF o�Po
BLYD
W1 ODD C, LNYDN
DR
REDLANDS 4�i
vA
4 AVE H
or
wrL pWo� _
C_ -
"BERNARDINO COUNTY
.
--
---- --- -- -- ---- - - - - - -,
-SAN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY - �y �..
��- . �. . _r -.._ -
_ i
r-
VI
N
fA
- -
N N
G :C9 N H
Q
f
N
H Yf
N
8 W O
A
Q
PREPARED FOR:
CITY OF YUCAIPA
Public Works Department G �0
34272 Yucaipa Boulevard
I - Yucaipa, CA 92399
PREPARED BY:
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ITS - Traffic/Civil/Electrical Engineering - Transportation Planning - Homeland Security - CEM 23282 Mill Creek Drive, Suite 120
- —i Laguna Hills, CA 92653
December 22, 2023
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING
AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS)
FOR SPEED LIMITS
YUCAIPA, CA
PREPARED FOR:
PREPARED BY:
CC �p
hod Jl
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
M 1 NAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Traffic/Civil/Electrical Engineering - ITS - Transportation Planning - CEM DECEMBER 22, 2023
CITY OF
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS)
I, Fred Minagar do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Yucaipa was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional Civil Engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) Rev. 7, effective Mar. 10, 2023. Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of existing traffic conditions collected and measured in the field on City of Yucaipa roadways.
Fred Minagar, MS, RCE, PE, Registration No. 53466
Project Manager
.N
r 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY srEED
ENFORCED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 — Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 5 2 — Background/Discussion.................................................................................................... 9 3 — Current Regulations..........................................................................................................10 4 — Speed Zoning Principles..................................................................................................11 5 - Methodology......................................................................................................................13 6 — Engineering & Traffic Survey Results and Recommendations......................................27 7 — Applicable Vehicle Codes.................................................................................................28 8 - References.........................................................................................................................39
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: Map of Recommended Speed Limits
Appendix B: Summary of Recommended Changes to Posted Speed Limits Appendix C: Roadway Segment Analysis of Factors Not Readily Apparent and Traffic Data Summary Sheets
(Available in the office of the Director of Development Services/City Engineer) Appendix D: Radar Speed Survey Sheets
(Available in the office of the Director of Development Services/City Engineer) Appendix E: 24-Hour Machine Counts (ADT) Traffic Volume Data (Available in the office of the Director of Development Services/City Engineer) Appendix F: Speed Gun Calibration Certification
(0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY ifSPEED
ENfOflCEO
for SPEED LIMITS Dr
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
1 — Executive Summary
This report recommends the establishment and revision of posted speed limits for one -hundred (100) street segments on forty-six (46) citywide streets within the City of Yucaipa, California, and discusses the findings of the Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) conducted by Minagar & Associates, Inc. which was used to determine these results. This E&TS Report was requested by and prepared for the City of Yucaipa as a record of existing conditions on the selected roadways, and to provide the City with a basis for updating and validating its currently posted speed limits on citywide streets.
Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. In accordance with the latest relevant sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD Rev. 7, effective Mar. 10, 2023), and Federal Highway Administration Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (FHWA MUTCD, 11th Edition, Dec. 2023), the E&TS must consider, at a minimum, the following contributing factors toward the establishment of appropriate posted speed limits:
1) Analysis of prevailing speeds, as determined by traffic engineering measurements 2) Analysis of collision records for the most recent available January 1, 2018 — December 31, 2022 period
3) Other highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to drivers.
When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local
authorities may consider factors such as roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation,
shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection
spacing and offsets, commercial driveway
characteristics, pedestrian and bicyclist safety, the 10- MPH pace range of prevailing traffic, roadside
development and environment, parking practices, and
the density of adjacent residential and/or business
frontage.
The findings of this E&TS reveal
that 90 out of the 100 surveyed
street segments are
recommended to remain at their
currently established posted
speed limit as documented, and
would not require any changes
to the existing posted
regulatory signage or speed
limit pavement markings; 2
segments are recommended for
decrease in the existing posted
The findings of this E&TS reveal that 90 out of the 100 speed limit and 2 are surveyed street segments are recommended to remain recommended for an increase in at their currently established posted speed limit as the existing posted speed limit documented, and would not require any changes to the 6 segments require a new speed existing posted regulatory signage or speed limit limit to be established/posted. pavement markings; 2 segments are recommended for
decrease in the existing posted speed limit and 2 are recommended for an increase in the existing posted speed limit. 6 segments require a speed limit to be established/posted.
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 5
s it 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY srEEo
for SPEED LIMITS ENFORCE
BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
The following list summarizes the findings of the E&TS and categorizes street segments which are recommended to maintain, increase, or decrease their existing posted speed:
Summary of Proposed Speed Limits
�E��i���rr•■•r.>�r�:E.�r.1�s.■■rrE�rsi
• � - .
I-
2nd Street
Date Ave
to
Yucaipa Blvd
30 MPH
2 -
2nd Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Wildwood Canyon Rd
35 MPH
3 -
3rd Street
Date Ave
to
Yucaipa Blvd
30 MPH
4 -
3rd Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Wildwood Canyon Rd
35 MPH
5 -
3rd Street
Wildwood Canyon Rd
to
County Line Rd
35 MPH
6 -
4th Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Wildwood Canyon Rd
35 MPH
7 -
5th Street
Oak Glen Rd
to
Yucaipa Blvd
45 MPH
8 -
5th Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Wildwood Canyon Rd
40 MPH
9 -
5th Street
Wildwood Canyon Rd
to
County Line Rd
35 MPH
10 -
6th Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Ave E
35 MPH
11 -
6th Street
Ave E
to
Wildwood Canyon Rd
35 MPH
12 -
7th Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Enoch Ave
35 MPH
13 -
8th Street
Liberty Rd
to
Ave E
30 MPH
14 -
10th Street
Chapman Heights Rd
to
Yucaipa Blvd
35 MPH
15 -
10th Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Oak Glen Rd
35 MPH
16 -
11th Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Ave D
30 MPH
17 -
12th Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Ave E
35 MPH
18 -
13th Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Ave E
35 MPH
19 -
13th Street
Ave E
to
Oak Glen Rd
35 MPH
20 -
14th Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Oak Glen Rd
35 MPH
21 -
15th Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Kentucky St
35 MPH
22 -
16th Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Outer Hwy 10
35 MPH
23 -
Avenue D
17th St
to
13th St
35 MPH
24 -
Avenue D
13th St
to
Oak Glen Rd
35 MPH
25 -
Avenue E
Yucaipa Blvd
to
16th St
35 MPH
26 -
Avenue E
16th St
to
Oak Glen Rd
35 MPH
27 -
Avenue E
Oak Glen Rd
to
8th St
40 MPH
28 -
Avenue E
8th St
to
California St
35 MPH
30-
Avenue H
5th Place
to
2nd St
35 MPH
31 -
Avenue H
2nd St
to
Bryant St
35 MPH
32 -
Avenue H
Bryant St
to
Holmes St
35 MPH
33 -
Bella Vista Drive
Fremont St
to
Holmes St
35 MPH
34 -
Bryant Street
North City Limits
to
Oak Glen Rd
50 MPH
35-
Bryant Street
Oak Glen Rd
to
Date Ave
45 MPH
36 -
Bryant Street
Date Ave
to
Yucaipa Blvd
45 MPH
37 -
Bryant Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Wildwood Canyon Rd
35 MPH
38 -
Bryant Street
Wildwood Canyon Rd
to
County Line Rd
35 MPH
39 -
California Street
Date Ave
to
Yucaipa Blvd
35 MPH
40-
California Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Ave B
25 MPH
6 MINAGAR
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
ENFDADED
BY
RADAR
41 -
California Street
Ave B
to
Ave E
25 MPH
42 -
California Street
Ave E
to
Wildwood Canyon Rd
40 MPH
43 -
California Street
Wildwood Canyon Rd
to
Ave H
35 MPH
44 -
California Street
Ave H
to
County Line Rd
35 MPH
45-
Calimesa Boulevard
Oak Glen Rd
to
Wildwood Canyon Rd
50 MPH
46 -
Calimesa Boulevard
Wildwood Canyon Rd
to
County Line Rd
50 MPH
48 -
Campus Drive
"Ll" Bend (Mid -way)
to
Sand Canyon Rd
25 MPH
49 Chapman Heights
Sand Canyon Rd
to
10th St
40 MPH
Road
50-
Chapman Heights
10th St
to
Oak Glen Rd
35 MPH
Road
51 -
Colorado Street
Oak Glen Rd
to
Wildwood Canyon Rd
35 MPH
52 -
County Line Road
1-10 Freeway
to
3rd St
35 MPH
53 -
County Line Road
3rd St
to
Bryant St
35 MPH
55 -
Date Avenue
3rd St
to
Bryant St
25 MPH
57 -
Date Avenue
Fremont St
to
Pendleton Rd
25 MPH
58 -
Douglas Street
Date Ave
to
Wildwood Canyon Rd
25 MPH
60 -
Dunlap Boulevard
Ave E
to
16th St
40 MPH
61 -
Dunlap Boulevard
16th St
to
14th St (End)
40 MPH
62 -
Fir Avenue
Jefferson St
to
Bryant St
25 MPH
64 -
Fremont Street
Date Ave
to
Yucaipa Blvd
35 MPH
65 -
Fremont Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Ave E
30 MPH
66 -
Fremont Street
Ave E
to
Bella Vista Dr
35 MPH
67 -
Fremont Street
Ave H
to
County Line Rd
35 MPH
68 -
Fremont Street
Oak Glen Rd
to
Ivy Ave
25 MPH
70 -
Holmes Street
Bella Vista Dr
to
Wildwood Canyon Rd
35 MPH
71 -
Ivy Avenue
Juniper Ave
to
Fremont St
30 MPH
73 Live Oak Canyon
Outer Hwy 10
to
Southwest City Limits
40 MPH
Road
74 -
Mesa Grande Drive
Wildwood Canyon Rd
to
County Line Rd
40 MPH
75 -
Nebraska Street
7th Place
to
Wildwood Canyon Rd
25 MPH
77 -
Oak Glen Road
Northeast City Limits
to
Cherry Croft Dr
50 MPH
78 -
Oak Glen Road
Cherry Croft Dr/Jefferson St
to
Bryant St
50 MPH
79 -
Oak Glen Road
Bryant St
to
5th St
45 MPH
80 -
Oak Glen Road
5th St
to
Yucaipa Blvd
45 MPH
81 -
Oak Glen Road
Yucaipa Blvd
to
Ave E
40 MPH
82 -
Oak Glen Road
Ave E
to
Calimesa Blvd
45 MPH
83 -
Oakwood Circle
Crafton Hills Dr (E)
to
Crafton Hills Dr (W)
25 MPH
84 -
Overcrest Drive
Tennessee St
to
Hampton Rd
35 MPH
86 -
Sunnyside Drive
Oak Glen Rd
to
Bryant St
25 MPH
87 -
Tennessee Street
Yucaipa Blvd
to
18th St
35 MPH
88 -
Washington Drive
9th St
to
7th St
30 MPH
89 Wildwood Canyon
Calimesa Blvd
to
5th St
40 MPH
Road
90 -
Wildwood Canyon
5th St
to
Bryant St
40 MPH
Road
91 Wildwood Canyon
Bryant St
to
Holmes St
45 MPH
Road
7 i • MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY F110EDfor SPEED LIMITS R f
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
■1 '
92 -
Wildwood Canyon
Holmes St
to
Mesa Grande Dr
45 MPH
Road
93 Wildwood Canyon
Mesa Grande Dr
to
Oak Mesa Dr
45 MPH
Road
94 Wildwood Canyon
Oak Mesa Dr
to
Oak Glen Rd
45 MPH
Road
95 -
Yucaipa Boulevard
1-10 Freeway
to
Sand Canyon Rd
45 MPH
96 -
Yucaipa Boulevard
Sand Canyon Rd
to
Oak Glen Rd
40 MPH
97 -
Yucaipa Boulevard
Oak Glen Rd
to
5th St
40 MPH
98 -
Yucaipa Boulevard
5th St
to
2nd St
35 MPH
99 -
Yucaipa Boulevard
2nd St
to
Bryant St
25 MPH
100 -
Yucaipa Boulevard
Bryant St
to
Fremont St
35 MPH
47 - Campus Drive Sand Canyon Rd to "U" Bend (Mid -way) 35 to 30 MPH 85 - Sand Canyon Road North City Limits to Yucaipa Blvd 50 to 45 MPH • Won rT4 & • • •
29 - Avenue E California St to Fremont St 25 to 30 MPH
56 - Date Avenue Bryant St to Fremont St 25 to 30 MPH
54 -
County Line Road
Bryant St
to
Mesa Grande Dr
N/P to 40
MPH
59 -
Douglas Street
Ave H
to
County Line Rd
N/P to 40
MPH
63 -
Fir Avenue
Bryant St
to
Sunnyside Dr
N/P to 35
MPH
69 -
Grape Avenue
Bryant St
to
Holly Ave
N/P to 35
MPH
72 -
Kentucky Street
12th St
to
Dunlap Blvd
N/P to 35
MPH
76 -
Oak Glen Road
Wildwood Canyon Rd
to
South City Limits
N/P to 40
MPH
A summary table of proposed changes to posted speeds is provided in Appendix B and roadway segment analysis of factors not readily apparent and traffic data summary certification sheets justifying posted speed limits for all 100 street segments are provided in Appendix C.
Additional supporting documentation of the survey's methodology are provided in the following sections of this report, including project background, current speed regulations, speed zoning principles, survey methodology, daily traffic volume counts, and radar spot speed survey data upon which the overall conclusions of this engineering and traffic survey and recommended posted speed limits are based.
Radar speed survey sheets, 24-hour machine tube counts (ADT) data, speed gun calibration certificates are provided in Appendices D, E, & F respectively. a MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 8
�,_„ 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY SPEED
POWENFDflEEO
for SPEED LIMITS flr
RADAR
CITY OF YUCAIPA. CA
2 — Background/Discussion
The California Manual on Traffic Uniform Control Devices (CAMUTCD) states that local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 7 or 14 years, in compliance with Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) to reevaluate non -statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review. Speed limits are used to both regulate and guide motorists' speed choices, and are visibly posted on the roadside as a tool to reduce the dangers that drivers might otherwise impose on road users by driving at unsafe speeds.
It is a common assumption that the posting of a speed limit sign will lead to a motorist driving at that speed; however, historical evidence and research shows that the majority of drivers will travel at roadway speeds which seem the most reasonable given the prevailing driving conditions.
Speed regulations construed as unreasonable have the potential to be disregarded by an unsafe majority of motorists; therefore, a "reasonable" speed limit is commonly one that conforms to the actual behavior of the general motoring public. Based upon this concept, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) provides the Basic Speed Law which states that:
"No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than what is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The purpose of controlling speed limits using law enforcement is not to burden motorists with unreasonable laws, but to give motorists a clear indication of the maximum driving speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions, and reflects surrounding roadway and roadside conditions which may not be apparent to drivers. Speed limits established on the basis of an E&TS provide law enforcement officers with a means to regulate the top fringe of drivers who are disposed to reckless and unreliable driving behaviors, have faulty judgment, or will otherwise not conform to the Basic Speed Law and to what the majority of drivers find to be reasonable and prudent.
a MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY ENFORCED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
3 — Current Regulations
Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour (mph). All other speed limits are called prima facie limits, which "at first sight", are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Specific prima facie limits established by California law include:
70 mph - May be posted by the governing authority on the basis of an engineering and traffic study and consultation with the California Highway Patrol (CHIP). 65 mph - On all streets and highways, unless otherwise posted or if prevailing conditions meet the criteria for a lower prima facie speed limit, as described below. 55 mph - On two-lane undivided highways (i.e., highways not physically divided and have no more than one lane per each direction, excluding passing lanes). 25 mph - When approaching or passing a posted "SCHOOL" zone, when children are going to and from school; in a "business district' or "residence district," as defined by the CVC; or when passing a "senior center" facility.
15 mph - In any alley; or when approaching a "blind" highway intersection or rail -highway grade crossing uncontrolled by traffic control devices (i.e., limited sight distance in advance of the uncontrolled intersection or crossing, as defined by the CVC).
In addition to the above prima facie speed limits, a local authority may declare and establish intermediate prima facie speed limits upon the basis of an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) in increments of 5 miles per hour up to 60 mph, or a maximum speed limit of 65 mph, whichever is found to be most appropriate in facilitating the orderly movement of traffic and is also reasonable and safe. E&TS provide an analysis of roadway conditions, accident records, and the prevailing speed of drivers representatively traveling the highway under study. Since unjustified speed limits can be difficult to enforce, the E&TS is essential in preventing the establishment of speed limits which are below or above what is safe, and/or what the majority of drivers consider to be reasonable for the prevailing roadway, roadside and traffic conditions.
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) states that the use of radar or other speed measuring device to enforce speed limits which have not been justified based on an E&TS constitutes a "speed trap," notwithstanding certain qualifying conditions. An E&TS is valid for up to seven (7) years if the speed measuring devices used for speed enforcement are certified and properly calibrated, and the enforcing officer has completed the required operating courses for the speed -measuring device used, per CVC 40802(c)(2)(13)(i)(1). If an E&TS was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, but a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, it is valid for up to 14 years.
Given the above requirements, the California Vehicle Code prohibits authorities from securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle based on a speed trap. Conversely, drivers who do not comply with speed limits which have been lawfully justified and posted are subject to enforcement action. See Section 7 for CVC divisions and articles pertaining to this E&TS. 0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 10
,;- 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY EHFORCEo for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA flAUAR
4 — Speed Zoning Principles
Driver behavioral research has
been conducted over several CALIFORNIA
decades and finds that the VEHICLE
average driver chooses their CODE
driving speed based on the
appearance of the highway itself
and the prevailing traffic w -•• y^
conditions. Thus, the CVC and
CAMUTCD require that speed
limits be established in accordance with appropriate engineering practice and methods. The CAMUTCD provides standards, guidance and support for the preparation of engineering and traffic surveys, and requires that, at a minimum, the three following factors be considered in determining appropriate speed limits to facilitate the safe, sensible and orderly flow of traffic:
Prevailing speeds
Collision records
Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver Prevailing Speeds
Measuring the typical speed, or prevailing speed, of existing traffic flow allows the selection of an effective speed limit based on the presumption that the majority of motorists drive at speeds that are generally safe and reasonable. Prevailing speeds are determined by conducting a radar - based spot speed survey along a particular segment and direction along a roadway to measure a sample number of vehicle speeds during generally free -flow traffic conditions. For this E&TS, radar speed surveys were conducted to collect a minimum of 100 speed samples during morning and afternoon time periods (9:00 AM — 4:00 PM).
The resulting measured speed data is organized and analyzed to extract various speed characteristics and driver trends, such as the ten -mile pace range, average speed traveled, and the 85th percentile speed. The most significant speed attribute obtained from the survey is the 85th percentile speed, or critical speed, and is defined as one (1) standard deviation above 501h percentile (average speed), or simply the free -flow speed at or below which 85% of the motorists were surveyed to be traveling. Since only 15% of the motorists exceed this value, the 85th percentile speed is normally used as an initial (presumptive) value for the updated posted speed limit, and adjusted downward or upward as other conditions necessitate. Based on current CAMUTCD guidelines and California state law, when a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5-MPH increment to the surveyed 85th percentile speed, except under the following optional conditions in which it may otherwise establish:
The posted speed may be reduced by 5 MPH from the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile speed upon due consideration for additional factors not readily apparent to r MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 11
- 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY ENFORCED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
the typical driver which have been appropriately justified and documented in the E&TS, and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer (see CVC §627 and 22358.5).
For cases which require rounding up the field -surveyed 85`h percentile speed to the nearest 5-MPH increment (e.g., 38 MPH rounded up to 40 MPH), the selected speed limit may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5-MPH increment below the surveyed 851h percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (see CVC §21400(b)).
In accordance with CVC §40802, a "speed trap" does not apply to active and posted school zones or "local streets" as defined in the current California Road System (CRS). A local authority may therefore post an appropriately established prima facie speed limit on such roadways without requiring a recent engineering and traffic survey or determination based on the procedures set forth in §22352, §22354, §22357 or 22358.3 of the code.
Collision Records
The most recent collision data was also considered in setting appropriate speed limits. Drivers may underestimate the effects of higher speeds on crash probability and severity. An above - average collision rate, particularly due to unsafe speeding related incidents, might suggest existence of conditions which are not readily apparent to motorists; this should be considered when reevaluating the appropriate speed limit for the roadway segment.
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
Each street segment was additionally evaluated to identify and document any roadway, roadside, traffic and other significant features which may not be readily apparent to motorists and may justify selecting a posted speed limit based on a five mile -per -hour reduction from the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85'h percentile speed. Such conditions would exist where the combined influence of one or more of these factors could result in uncharacteristic or unexpected driving conditions, and in turn, affect the ability of drivers to properly judge the safest and most appropriate travel speed for a particular situation or location.
Examples of such factors include: shoulder conditions (e.g., on -street parking, closely -spaced and/or blind driveway traffic), sight distance and/or geometric constraints (e.g., narrow streets, horizontal roadway curvature, hilly grades), pedestrian and bicyclist safety (e.g., mid -block crosswalks, bike lanes and routes), uniformity and consistency between contiguous speed zones (e.g., length of the speed zone, spacing and frequency of traffic -controlled intersections, speed zone transitions on "boundary line" streets), and land use conditions adjacent to the roadway (e.g., residential and business districts, commercial driveways, senior centers, etc.).
The CVC stipulates that, in the absence of other factors, physical conditions such as roadway width, curvature, grade and surface pavement conditions are considered to be readily apparent and are the responsibility of the driver to perceive and react to without requiring a special downwardly zoned posted speed limit, per CVC Section 22358.5. Valid consideration of one or more of the above conditions determined as not readily apparent to motorists, however, provides the required justification to allow for a 5-mile per hour (MPH) reduction from the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile where engineering judgment presents evidence and 12 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
, - 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY ToSPEED
Poll,"
` for SPEED LIMITS ENFB�CED
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA LZ-1-
documentation that an adjustment for these factors is needed to match the existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community and road users. 5 - Methodology
Data Collection
In accordance with discussions with city staff, the scope of the study consisted of 100 roadway segments on 46 citywide streets within the City of Yucaipa. Study segments were determined by city staff, generally on the basis of previous zone designations established by the previous 2018 speed survey.
Procedure
The primary goal of this E&TS is to determine the suitability of currently -posted speed limits in the City of Yucaipa, and resolve to either change or maintain as -is the designated speed limits along each of the surveyed speed zones. To make these determinations, the study compiled information both in the field and from City records on prevailing motorist speeds, recent collision history, comparative collision rates for similar roadway types, and any significant roadside conditions not evident to motorists. References under which this study was conducted include sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) provided in Section 7 of this report and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) developed by Caltrans in cooperation with the USDOT/Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
Speed Zoning
The principal method utilized in this E&TS was speed zoning, a process which uses prevailing speeds of drivers as a guide to establish reasonable speed limits for highway sections where original statutory speed limits set by State ordinance may be considered less suitable for the local conditions. Establishment of posted speed limits by speed zoning methods allows motorists to be informed of the safe speed limit under which to drive on a particular roadway under normal conditions, and also protects the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Spot radar speed surveys were conducted to determine the prevailing speeds of drivers on each of the 100 segments.
The surveys were performed during normal, non -holiday weekdays in November of 2023 during typical daytime periods. The unimpeded free -flow speeds of individual vehicles were measured during the off-peak time periods (9:00 AM — 4:00 PM) with a minimum survey count of either one hundred (100) or two hundred (200) radar samples (i.e., approximately 50 and 100 per direction for street segments without or with raised medians respectively, or for 2 hours of survey). Detailed radar speed zoning sheets are included in Appendix D.
Following the collection of spot speed survey data, all radar measurements were organized, computed, analyzed and summarized on standard Traffic Survey Forms. Various speed -related characteristics were then determined, including the following:
85t" Percentile Speed: The speed at which 85% of surveyed motorists did not exceed (i.e., no more than 15% of traffic exceeded) during the radar jdlbk
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 13
, � 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY seEED
ENFORCED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA flAOAfl
survey. Also called critical speed, equals one standard deviation from the average speed.
50'h Percentile Speed: The speed at which half of surveyed motorists did not exceed during the radar survey. Also called the median speed, by definition 50% of the observed speeds are below the median, and the other half are above the median.
10-MPH Pace: The 10-mile per hour range containing the largest percentage of speed observations; provides an alternative and more readily identifiable measure to the standard deviation to describe the dispersion of speeds within the survey sample. Consistency in travel speeds is evidenced by a pace that usually includes between 70% and 80% of the free -flowing vehicles. Similar reported statistical data includes the percentage of surveyed vehicles over and under the 10-MPH Pace range.
Average Speed. Equals the calculated average speed of all surveyed vehicles.
Also called the mean speed.
The above statistical attributes were obtained for each segment from the speed survey data collected in the field, and then applied using the CAMUTCD guidelines. The recommended speed limit was presumptively determined as the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile speed of free -flowing traffic, with a downward 5-MPH adjustment applied if necessary to reflect the presence of conditions not readily apparent to drivers or to match the existing traffic needs of the community.
It is significant to note that former versions of the California MUTCD required that posted speed limits be presumptively set at the nearest 5-MPH increment to the surveyed the 85th percentile speed, and then adjusted by 5 MPH if justifiable and documented in the study. The most current release of the CAMUTCD (Rev. 7, effective Mar. 2023), however, presently allows for speed limits to be set at the lower 5-MPH increment to the surveyed 851h percentile speed in those cases where the nearest 5-MPH increment would normally require rounding up, if no further reduction is used. In order to satisfy local traffic and roadway conditions, local agencies may apply this judgment at its own discretion without any required supporting documentation or reasons in the Engineering and Traffic Survey. The results of the speed zoning analysis are summarized in Tables 1-4.
Collisions Analysis
The collisions analysis compared recent collision history data with expected collision rates for similar roadway types. The analysis was based on a review of reported traffic accidents obtained from the City of Yucaipa, queried for the latest available traffic collision information from the Police Department's traffic collisions record database for a period of 5 years (60 months) between January 2018 and December 2022. The raw collision data was then screened to consider only WMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 14
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING 8E TRAFFIC SURVEY srEEo
ENFORCED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
speeding -related accidents as the primary collision factor, based on the recommended practice provided in the CAMUTCD and Caltrans' Traffic Manual. Non -speeding related accident reports were omitted from the analysis since this data does not directly correlate to vehicle speeding and can tend to overstate collision rates, particularly for shorter segments.
Prevailing collision rates for each segment were calculated by first determining the total number of speed -related collisions which have occurred during the selected 60-month period. This, along with the measured 24-hour average daily traffic volume of the segment from machine traffic counts collected in the field (see Appendix E for machine count data sheets) and the known segment length, was used in the standard formula below to determine the calculated collision rate for each segment, expressed in terms of collisions per million vehicle miles traveled:
Collision Rate
Collisions No. of Collisions * 1,000,000
Mvm - ADT * Distance * No. of Days
where: No. of Collisions
Number of speed -related collisions on the segment during the selected analysis period (50.5 months), both directions
1,000,000 Conversion factor for Million -Vehicle -Miles (MVM) ADT Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day), both directions Distance Roadway segment distance traveled by each vehicle (miles) No. of Days Number of days during the selected analysis period (i.e., 1.00 year = 365 days)
The speed zoning analysis tables for each segment are provided on the following pages and utilize the following abbreviations and terminology.
DEFINITIONS:
10-mi. Pace
Equals the 10-mile per hour range in which the largest
number of vehicles were observed to be traveling
% in 10-mi.
Pace
The percentage of the total vehicles observed traveling in the 10-mile per hour pace
50th Percentile
The speed at which half of the observed speeds were
observed below and half were observed above
85th Percentile
The speed at or below which 85% of the observed vehicles were surve ed to be traveling at
KEY:
Dist.
= Distance of segment LU = Land Use
ART
= Arterial (CRS) C = Commercial
COL
= Collector (CRS) B = Business
LOC
= Local St (CRS) R = Residential
Posted
= Existing Posted Speed Limit C&I = Civic and Institutional PPSL
= Presumptive Posted Speed Limit S = School
ReC.
= Recommended Posted Speed Limit P = Parks & Recreation ♦
= Speed Increase O = Open Space
♦
= Speed Decrease • = Post Speed Limit Sign
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 15
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY ENFORCED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA eaonB
Table 1: Speed Zoning Analysis Summary for Segments 1-25 Street
NO.
ROADWAY INFORMATION
S meat
Oescdption
10-w
p—
I,,,tyl
I i%in 10.
!,w Pxei
SOIh
Porconlila
1,,,�1
aft
PMcemile
Speed
j Analysis/
Justification(s)
— ---
From
----
To
Dist.
m
Trpo�
Lu
Posted
PPSL
__
Rx.
2nd St
1 }
} Date Ave
Yucaipa Blvd
0.50 COL
R / C
28-37
( 78%
I
! 32
36 30
35 ! 30
No change - due to current 85th
-
!
l
percentile speed
2nd St
2 Blvd
125
COL
���
32-41
75%
` 37
I 42
35 40
! 35
_ No change - due to current 85th
IYuxaipa
Canyon Rd
nyo
percentile speed
3rd St
3 'Date Ave
Yucaipa Blvd
0.45 COL
R/C
28-37
77%
32 36
30 35
30 _ No change - due to current SSIh
percentile speed
3rd St
4 Yucaipa Blvd
I
Wiildwood
Canyon Rd
1.25 COL
R/C/S
3241
76 %
38 42
35 40
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
I
3rd St
5 Wildwood
(Canyon Rd
County Line Rd
0.96 COL
RB
33-42
74%
38 42
35 40
35 _ No change - due to limited sight
distance
4th St
6 }Yucaipa Blvd
Wikiwood
1.25 COL
R/C/
34-43
77%
38 43
35 45
35 No change - due to current 85th
- percentile speed and higher
I
Canyon Rd
C&I
calculated collision rate than expected
Sth St
7 Oak Glen Rd
Yucaipa Blvd
0.82 ART
WC/
39.48 72%
44 50
45 50
, 45
_ No change - due to current 85th
C&I
}
percentile speed
5lh St
8 Yucaipa Blvd
Wuktwood
1.25 ART
R/
33 42
73 %
38 42
40 40
40 _ No change - due to current 85th
Carryon Rd
C&I
percentile speed
Sth St
9 Nfildwood
County Line Rd
0.82 ART
30-39
85%
35 39
35 40
35 _ No change -due to limited sight
Canyon Rd
C&I
distance
6th St
10 Yucaipa Blvd
Ave E
0.50 j COL
R/S
36-45
j i 70%
j
; 39
}
} 44
35 45
{ j 35
No change - due to current 85th
-percentile speed
6th St
11 I
}
Wildwood
R/
j
ji
No change - due to current 85th
;Ave E
Canyon Rd
rtyo
0.95 COL
C&!
32-41
67%
i 37
44 35
45 35
- percentile speed & limited sight
!
distance
7th St
12 ;;
Yucaipa Blvd
Enoch Ave
1.01 COL
R/C/
29-38
69%
34 41
35 40
35 No change - due to current 85th
-
C&I
percentile speed
Bth St
13 {Liberty Rd
Ave E
0.43 i COL
R
32-41
( 74%
j
35 } 40
30 40
30 No change - due to current 85th
-percentile speed
Chapman
No change - due to current 85th
10th St
14 Heights Rd
Yucaipa Blvd
0.54 COL
R
34-43
67%
38 43
35 45
35 _ percentile speed & limited sight
distance
No change - due to current 851h
10th St
15 Yucaipa Blvd
Oak Glen Rd
0.36 COL
R/C
28-37
69%
33 39
35 40
35 _ percentile speed and higher
calculated collision rate than expected
11 th St
16 IYucaipa Blvd
Ave D
0.25 COL
R/C
26-35
( 75% i
30 34
30 35 {
30 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
12th St
17 '
Yucaipa Blvd
Ave E
0.50 COL
R/S
28-37
66%
34 39
35 40
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
13th St
18 IYucaipa
Blvd
Ave E
0.50 COL
R/C
31.40 66% (
35 40
35 40 !
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
{
!
percentile speed
13th St
19 fAveE
Oak Glen Rd
0.53 COL j
RIB
31-40
73%
36 41
35 i
40 35
- change - due tocurrent 85th
III
}
percentile speed
pe
14th St
20 Yucaipa Blvd
Oak Glen Rd
1.12 ART
R/C
32-41
77%
36 I
41 35
40 35
_ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
15th St
21 Yucaipa Blvd
Kentucky St
0.19 COL
R
25-34
80%
29 34
35 35
j
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
16th St
22 Yucaipa Blvd
Outer Hwy 10
0.85 COL
R
28-37
75%
33 37
35 35
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
Avenue D
23 117th
St
13th St
0.94 i
R
22-31
67%
29 35
35 35
No change -due to current 85th
higher
LOC
i
35 _ percentile speed and
}
(
}
l
calculated collision rate than expected
Avenue D
24 j
13th St
Oak Glen Rd
0.52 COL
R
30-39
73 %
33 38
35 40 1
35 _ N° change -due to current 85th
i
j
percentile speed
Avenue E
25 Yucaipa Blvd
16th St
0.91 COL
R/S/
32 41
78%
37 41
35 40
35 No change - due to current 85th
-
C&!
percentile speed
t - MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
16 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY ER ORDED
for SPEED LIMITS RY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
Table 2: Speed Zoning Analysis Summary for Segments 26-50 Street
No.
ROADWAY
Se ment
Descrip°on
farm.
Pace
fo")
xm
10-,m
Pace
San
Percemite
(-Ph)
aun
Pero -We
rtnd0
speedu,tdt
Analysis/
5 Justification(s)
From
To
Dist
,
;Tree
, to
posted
PPa
' Rec.
i
Avenue E
26 16th St
Oak Glen Rd
1.23 COL/
R/S/
31 40
73%
35 39
35 40
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
LOC
C&I
percentile speed
Avenue E
27 Oak Glen Rd
8th St
0.75 LOC
R
39AB
70 %
42 48
40 50
40 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
No change - due to current 85th
Avenue E
28 8th St
California St
1.79 LOC
C&i
30-39
74%
36 41
35 40
35 - percentile speed & adjacent
assisted living facility
LOC/
R/
Increase - Mostly residential thru
Avenue E
29 California St
Fremont St
0.50 COL
C&I
31A0
71 %
37 41
25 40
30 road with adjacent religious
I
institution
Avenue H
30 Sth Place
St
0.74 COL
R
3342
83%
37 41
35 40
35 _ No charge - due to current 85th
�2nd
percentile speed
Avenue H
31 2nd St
Bryant St
0.50 i COL'
R/
30-39
76 %
35 39
35 40
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
i
C&I
i
percentile speed
Avenue H
32 Bryant St
Holmes St
0.75 COL
R/S
34-43
71 %
37 42
35 40
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
Bella Vista Dr
33 Fremont St
(Holmes St
0.25 LOC
R
3241
82 %
36 40
35 40
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
Bryant St
34 North City
JOak Glen Rd
2.22 ART
R/O
42-51
62 %
47 53
50 55
I 50
No change - due to current 85th
-
Limits
!!
percentile speed
Bryant
No change - due to current 85th
St
35 Oak Glen Rd
Date Ave
0.50 ART
C&1
40-49
69%
43 49
45 50
45 - percentile speed, adjacent religious
institution
Bryant St
36 Date Ave
Yucaipa Blvd
0.50 ART
RIC
37-46
71 %
42 47
45 45
45 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
Bryant St
37 Yucaipa Blvd
i Wildwood
Canyon Rd
1.25 I ART
I
R/
C&I
33-42
81 %
37 42
35 40
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
I
i
Bryant St
38 Wildwood
Canyon Rd
County Line Rd
0.92 ? ART
R/
28-37
82%
32 37
35 35
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
C&I
percentile speed
California St
39 Date Ave
Yucaipa Blvd
0.50 COL
R
28-37
80%
33 38
35 40
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
California St
40 Yucaipa Blvd
Ave B
0.14 ART
S/C
17-25
90%
21 24
25 25
25 _ No charge - due to current 851h
percentile speed
California St
41 Ave B
Ave E
0.35 ART
S/C
25-34
77 %
30 35
25 35
25 - No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
California St
42 Ave E
Wildwood
0.75 ART
WC,/No
39AB
72%
43 48
40 50
40 change - due to current 85th
_ percentile speed, adjacent religious
Can ynn Rd
C&t
institution
California St
43 Wildwood
Ave H
0.54 ART
O/P
35-44
83 %
40 43
35 45
35 - No change - due to current 85th
Canyon Rd
percentile speed
No charge - due to current 85th
California St
44 Ave H
County Line Rd
0.39 ART
C&I
3443
78 %
39 43
35 45
35 - percentile speed, adjacent religious
institution
Calimesa Blvd
45 Oak Glen Rd
1.19 ART
6/O
42-51
75 %
47 52
50 50
50 No change - due to current 85th
-
Rd
3 I
percentile speed
Calimesa Blvd
46 lWildwoodCanyon
Wildwood
line Rd
1.07 ART i
B/C/
39-48
65%
44 48
50 50
50 No change -due to current 85th
-
Canyon Rd ,County
R
percentile speed
Campus
Sand Canyon
"U" Ben (Mid-
Decrease - Limited sight distance,
Dr
47 Rd
way)
0.40 COL
C/O
20-29
78%
24 29
35 30
30 gradual hill EB, moderate hoizontal
curves
Campus Dr
48 "U" Ben (Mid-
Sand Canyon
0.69 COL
C
33-42
75 %
38 43
25 45
25 _ No change - due to limited sight
way)
Rd
distance
Chapman Heights
49 Sand Canyon
10thSt
1.50 COL
US/
41-50
70%
46 50
40 50
40 _ No change - due to current 85th
Rd
Rd
O
percentile speed
Chapman Heights
I
R/O/
I
No change - due to current 85th
Rd
50 10th St
Oak Glen Rd
0.65 COL
33-42
74%
37 42
35 40
35 _ percentile speed, nearby elementary
I
I ' MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
17 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY E FOflDED for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA. CA flno�fl
Table 3: Speed Zoning Analysis Summary for Segments 51-75 Street
NO.
ROADWAY
Se mail
Da dpeoa
la.-
Paco
(a,a,r
r m
10...
Peso
50rn
PemeaNa
(mM)
e5re
Perna W.
awnl
JP-dLi-f
I Analysis/
Justlfication(s)
From
To
D,Z
ryPe
—
�u
PbsIM
n
ppy
�;v
_
Colorado St
51 Oak Glen Rd
Wildwood
1.62 ART
RIP
29-38
76 %
33 38
35 40
35 No change - due to current 85th
-
Canyon Rd
percentile speed
County Line Rd
52 E10 Freeway
3rd St
1.00 LOC/
ART
CB/
R
34-43
5 %
38 41
35 40
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
County Line Rd
53 3rd St
Bryant St
0.75 ART
R
30-39
87 %
34 38
35 40
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
County Line Rd
54 Bryant St
DGrande
0.92 COL
R
35-44
78%
39 43
N/P
45 i
40 Post40 MPH Speed Limit
r
Date Avenue
55 3rd St
Bryant St
0.76 COL
R/
25-34
65%
29 35
25 35
25 _ No change - due to current 85th
C&I
percentile speed
Increase - Residential thru road with low
Date Avenue
56 Bryant St
Fremont St
0.50 COL
R
31-40
63 %
34 40
25 40
30 A. ADT and no curvature or elevation
change
Date Avenue
57 Fremont St
Pendleton Rd
0.38 COL
R
29-38
65 %
33 39
25 40
25 _ No change - Adjacent assisted living
facility
Wildwood
No change - due to current 85th
Douglas St
56 Date Ave
Canyon Rd
175
COL
R/O
21-30
78%1
24 29
25 30
25 - percentile speed and higher calculated
collision rate than effected
Douglas St
59 Ave H
County Line
0.38 COL
R
28-37
72%1
34 41
N/P
40 40
0 Post 40 MPH Speed Limit
Rd
Dunlap Blvd
60 Ave E
16th St
0.84 COL
RIB
34-43
56%
39 46
40 45
40 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
Dunlap Blvd
61 16th St
14th St (End)
0.52 COL
B
29-38
62 %
33 38
40 40
40 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
Fir Avenue
62 Jefferson St
Bryant St
0.991COL
R/O
22-31
92%
27 30
25 30
25 No change - 2013 EBTS established as
-
I
Resident District
Fir Avenue
63 Bryant St
Sunnyside Dr
0.50 LOC
R
28-37
69%
31 37
N/P
35 I
35 0 Post 35 MPH Speed Limit
No change - due to current 85th
Fremont St
64 Date Ave
Yucaipa Blvd
0.45 COL
R/O
31-40
62 %
36 43
35 45
35 - percentile speed and higher calculated
collision rate than expected
Fremont St
65 Yucaipa Blvd
Ave E
0.59 COL
R/P
29-38
78 %
32 36
30 35
30 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed 8 site distance
Fremont St
66 Ave E
Bella Vista Dr
0.52 COL
R
28-37
80%
31 36
35 35
35 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
Fremont St
67 Ave H
County Line
0.39 COL
R
29-38
76%
34 37
35 35
35 - No change - due to current 85th
Rd
percentile speed
Fremont St
68 Oak Glen Rd
Ivy Ave
1.50 LOC
R
23-32
74%
30 36
25 35
25 _ No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
Grape Avenue
69 Bryant St
Holly Ave
0.60 LOC
R
27-36
74 %
33 37
N/P
35 35
0 Post 35 MPH Speed Limit
Holmes St
70 Bella Vista Dr
Wildwood
0.24 COL
R
32-41
74 %
36 40
35 40
35 - No change - due to current 85th
Canyon Rd
percentile speed
No charge - due to current 85th
Ivy Avenue
71 Juniper Ave
Fremont St
0.50 COL
R
34-43
70%1
37 42
30 40
30 _ percentile speed and higher calculated
collision rate than expected
Kentucky St
72 12th St
Dunlap Blvd
0.95 COL
R/
28-37
72 %
33 37
N/P
35 35
0 Post 35 MPH Speed Limit
Live Oak Canyon
73 Outer Hwy 10
Southwest City
0.90 ART
R
40-49
I
69% j
44 49
40 50
40 No change -due to current 85th
-percent
Rd
I
Limits
le speed
Mesa Grande Dr
74 Wildwood
County Line
1.05 COL
RIP
3443
76 %
38 42
40 40
40 _ No change - due to current 85th
Canyon Rd
Rd
percentile speed
Nebraska St
75 7th Place
Wildwood
0.11 COL
R
15-24
61 %
22 29
25 30
25 _ No change - due to current 85th
Canyon Rd
percentile speed
l: MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
18 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY ERlORCED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
Table 4: Speed Zoning Analysis Summary for Segments 76-100 Street
No.
ROADWAY INFORMATION
—._ Segment oescripSm
+ae:.
reco
I,npu
xtn
ra ro.
Pece
5%h
I r�raennte
I prpr)
Bern
vercenote
prmnt
Speed umlr Analysis/
Posted 1 aysi Rec.
Justification(s)
From
To
o sr.
Toe
u
Oak Glen Rd
76 Wildwood
South City
0.21 ART
RIO
3948
72 %
42 45
NIP
45 40
Post40 MPH Speed Limit
Canyon Rd
Limits
Oak Glen Rd
77 Northeast City
Cherry Croft Dr
1.95 COL
RIO
3948
59 %
46 52
50 50
50 - No change - due to current 85th
Limits
percentile speed
Oak Glen Rd
78 Cherry Croft
Dr/Jefferson St
Bryant St
0.86 COL
RIC
41-50
66%
45 50
50 50
50 - No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
Oak Glen Rd
79 Bryant St
5th St
1.28 ART
RIP/
4049
75%
45 48
45 50
45 - No change - due to current 85th
O
percentile speed
Oak Glen Rd
80 5th St
Yucaipa Blvd
1.28 ART
RIC
43-52
79%
46 54
45 55
45 - No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
Oak Glen Rd
81 Yucaipa Blvd
Ave E
0.79 ART
R/01
3746
83 %
41 45
40 45
40 - No change - due to current 85th
C
percentile speed
Oak Glen Rd
82 Ave E
Calimesa Blvd
0.90 ART
RI01
3948
81 %
45 48
45 50
45 - No change - due to current 85th
C
percentile speed
Oakwood Circle
83 Grafton Hills Dr
Crafton Hills Dr
0.39 LOC
R
23-32
80%
26 33
25 I
1 30
25 No change - due to current 85th
- percentile speed, curvature, and
(E)
iW)
I
residential setting
No change - due to 85th percentile
Overcrest Dr
84 Tennesse St
Hampton Rd
0.46 COL
R
32-41
83 %
36 39
35 40
35 - speed and higher calculated collision
rate than expected
North City
Decrease - Limited sight distance,
NB,
Sand Canyon Rd
85 Limits
Yucaipa Blvd
0.94 ART
S/O
3746
72 %
41 45
50 45
45 uphill grade and moderate
horizontal curves
Sunnyside Dr
86 Oak Glen Rd
Bryant St
0.57 LOC
R
20-29
94 %
25 28
25 30
25 - No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed and residential setting
No change - due to current 85th
Tennesse St
87 Yucaipa Blvd
18th St
0.62 COL
Rio
3443
70%1
38 43
35 45
35 - percentile speed & higher calculated
collision rate than expected
Washington Dr
88 9th St
7th St
0.68 COL
R
28-37
80%
31 35
30 35
30 - No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed and residential setting
Wildwood Canyon
89 Calimesa Blvd
5th St
1.22 ART
RIO/
3847
78%1
42 46
40 45
40 _ No change- due to current 85th
Rd
I C&I
percentile speed
Wildwood Canyon
90 5th St
Bryant St
1.26 ART
R
3847
74 %
42 47
40 45
40 No change - due to current 85th
Rd
percentile speed and residential setting
Wildwood Canyon
91 Bryant St
Holmes St
0.75 ART
R
3948
86%
42 46
45 45
45 No change - due to current 85th
Rd
�
percentile speed and residential setting
Wildwood Canyon
92 Holmes St
Mesa Grande
0.80 ART
I R
42-51
83 %
46 50
45 j 50
45 No change - due to current 85th
-
Rd
Dr
1 percentile speed and residential setting
Wildwood Canyon
93 Mesa Grande
Oak Mesa Dr
103
ART/
RIP/
3948
70%
43 48
45 50
45 No change - due to current 85th
Rd
Dr
.
COL
O
percentile speed
Wildwood Canyon
94 Oak Mesa Or
Oak Glen Rd
1.58 COL
RIO
4049
73 %
43 48
45 50
45 No change - due to current 85th
Rd
percentile speed
Yucaipa Blvd
95 �10 Freeway
Sand Canyon
1.50 ART
BIC!
41-50
78 %
47 51
45 50
45 No change - due to current 85th
-
Rd
C&1
percentile speed
Yucaipa Blvd
96 Sand Canyon
Oak Glen Rd
1.29 ART
BIC/
36.45 83 %
42 44
40 45
40 - No change - due to current 85th
Rd
S
percentile speed
Yucaipa Blvd
97 Oak Glen Rd
5th St
1.21 ART
B/CI
3645
69 %
41 46
40 45
40 - No change - due to current 85th
C&I
percentile speed
Yucaipa Blvd
98 5th St
2nd St
0.75 ART
BIC
3241
76 %
36 40
35 40
35 - No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
Yucaipa Blvd
99 2nd St
Bryant St
0.50 ART
BIC
24-33
78 %
28 32
25 30
25 - No change - due to current 85th
percentile speed
Yucaipa Blvd
100
Bryant St
Fremont St
0.51 COU
RIP
29-38
78 %
33 37
35 35
35 - No change - due to current 85th
LOC
percentile speed
19 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
Poll"for SPEED LIMITS
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
SPEED
ENi'ICED
RY
RADAR
Table 5 shows the average statewide collision rates obtained from Caltrans' Collision Data on California State Highways, adjusted to represent proportional rates for speeding -related collisions. These expected rates were used to identify survey segments which exhibit a higher - than -expected collision rate.
Table 5: Expected Statewide Speed -Related Traffic Collision Rates ROADWAY TYPE* (URBAN) EXPECTED ACCIDENT RATE**
2 - 3 Lanes
0.90 collisions per million vehicle miles
4+ Undivided Lanes
0.73 collisions per million vehicle miles
4+ Divided Lanes
1.09 collisions per million vehicle miles
Source: 2021 Caltrans Annual Collision Data on California State Highways - Crash Summary for District 8 Agency, Department of Transportation, Division of Research, Innovation, and System Information. Sacramento, California. ' Based on FHWA approved 2020 adjusted urban area boundaries which are derived from the 2020 Census urban area boundaries " Basic Average Accident Rates tabulation data. Number of lanes are for both directions of travel and are applicable for both uni- and bi-directional surveyed roadway segments.
Other collected collision history data is summarized in the following figures. Overall, from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022, there has been a total of 830 total collisions reported on the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), based on Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). This included 19 fatalities and 1,117 other injured victims. The top primary collision factor (PCF) of these collisions was unsafe speed, as shown in the figure below. This PCF was responsible for 236 collisions out of 830 total collisions.
Figure 1: Number of Crashes by Primary Crash Factor (PCF) Violation (January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2022)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) 63 59`) 1'
17 123 (14.82 c)
t�*
133 (16.029.;) y
1 32 :3 86° '� 2y (2.5gY,)
PCF Violation
.Inc
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
20 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY If EEL]
for SPEED LIMITS Rr
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
Figure 2: Number of Crashes due to Unsafe Speed by Crash Type (January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2022)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) 286 Cra-SiIZs
200
c
U 100
0 O
Z
0 \`
Q2
J�
Ors\
X
Type of Crash
- - Not Stated A - Head -On 6 -Sideswipe 10 C -Rear End D - Broadside E -Hit Object F - Overturned G - Vehicle/Pecesc-ia• H -Other
Figure 3: Number of Crashes due to Unsafe Speed by Crash Severity (January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2022)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) r. o
150
5o
n
286 Crashes
1 - Fatal 2 - Injury (Severe) 3 - Injury (Other 4 - Injury Visible) (Complaint of
Pain)
Crash Severity
7 - Fatal 10 2 - inj.;ry (Severe) 3 - Injury (Other Visible) 4 - Injury (Complaint of Pain,) 21 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. �; IRW
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS
CITY OF YUCAIPA. CA
SPEED
ENFORCED
BY
ftADNR
To evaluate the collision behavior of each street segment, the calculated collision rate for each segment was compared to the average statewide collision rates for streets with comparable characteristics. The results of the accident analysis for the 100 roadway segments are summarized in Tables 6-9.
Table 6: Collision Data Summary and Analysis for Segments 1-25 Street
ROADWAYINFORMATION
_._....__._. _. _._._...... SeBment.Lt ml fs.._._............_........._.._........_Roadway No.
From To
T)pe..__�
No. of Direction
Lanes' Division i of Travel
Length
(mi.)
ADT
' (vpd)
COLLISION
Numberof
Collisions 2"
ANALYSIS
Col ilsfon Rate
Ex t�e/d's
Calculated
(AIM ) _ (AIM )
2nd Street
1 ]Date Ave ;Yucaipa Blvd
2 U NS
0.50 2.097
1 j 0.90
0.52 2nd Street
2 [Yucaipa Blvd !Wildwood Canyon Rd
2 1 U NS
1.25 2,762
1 ij 0.90
0.16 3rd Street
3 !Date Ave !Yucaipa Blvd
2 U ! WS
0.45 1,268
0 0.90
j 0.00
3rd Street
4 :Yucaipa Blvd !Wildwood Canyon Rd
2 U i WS
i
1.25 4,010
2 0.90
0.22 3rd Street
5 i Wildwood Canyon Rd 'CountyLine Rd
2 U NS
0.ss
i 4,238
1 0.90
0.13 4th Street
i 1
6 !Yucaipa Blvd iWildwood Canyon Rd
2 li
I U NS
1.25 i 2,298
5 0.90�95
5th Street
7 i0ak Glen Rd Yucaipa Blvd
4 D NS
0.82 7,101
2 1.09
1 0.19
5th Street
I
8 !Yucaipa Blvd Wildwood Canyon Rd
2 i
U j WS
1.25 7,532
3 0.90
! 0.17
Sth Street
9 !Wildwood Canyon Rd County Line Rd
2 U WS
i 0.62
5,373
3 0.90
0.37 6th Street
I
10 'Yucaipa Blvd Ave E
2 U NS
li
0.50 3,225
2 0.90
0.68 6th Street
11 !Aw E ; Wildwood Canyon Rd
2 U i WS
0.95 2,705
0 f
0.90 1
I 0.00
7th Street
12 IYucaipa Blvd jEnoch Ave
2 ! U WS
1.01 2,897
2 0,10
I
i 0.37
8th Street
13 ;Liberty Rd !Ave E
2 U WS
0.43 1.347
0 0.90
0.00 10th Street
14 jChapman Heights Rd lYucaipa Blvd
2 111'
U N/S
0.54 3,795
2 0.90
fff 0.53
10th Street
15 !Yucaipa Blvd ;Oak Glen Rd
2 U WS
I
0.36 1,378
2 0.90
2.21 11th Street
16 !Yucaipa Blvd !Ave D
2 U WS
0.25 538
0 0.90
I 0.00
12th Street
17 !Yucaipa Blvd !Ave E
2 I
i U NS
0.50 1.655
0 ] 0.90
0.00 13th Street
18 Yucaipa Blvd !Ave E
2 U WS
0.50 ° 21035
0 0.90
0.00 13th Street
19 i Ave E ;Oak Glen Rd
2 ! U I WS I9`
0.53 1.843
0 0.90
0.00 14th Street
20 'Yucaipa Blvd ,!Oak Glen Rd
2 U WS I
1.12 )
! 6,814
4 0.90
0.29 15th Street
21 !Yucaipa Blvd !Kentucky St
2 U WS !
0.19 491
0 0.90
! 0.00
16th Street
22 iYucaipa Blvd Outer Hwy10
2 JJJI
U WS
0.85 1,714
1 0.90
0.38 Avenue D
23 17th St 130h St
2 U E(W '
0.94 550
2 0.90 I1
;2.72
Avenue D
24 13thSt-OakGlen Rd
2 j
I
U E/W j
0.52 t
1,244
0 0.90 I
0.00 Avenue E
25 ;Yucaipa Blvd i 16th St
2 U F/W
0.91 2.865
2 0.90 j
0.42 Notes:
[1] Includes both directions of traffic on the selected roadway segment [2] Over a 5-year period from 1/1/18 to 12/31/22. Data compiled from U.C. Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TINS). [3] Collisions pertaining to unsafe speed as the primary collision factor. [4] Per Killion Vehicle Niles (WM)
[5] Collisions per Killion Vehicle -Niles of Travel = No. of Collisions x 1,000,000 ADTx Distance x No. of Days
where:
No. of Collisions = Total number of speed -related collisions recorded on the segment for period of 5.00 years (1825 days) ADT= Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day, both directions of traffic except for one-sided segments as indicated) Distance = Total length of segment (miles)
No. of Days = 365 days for a duration period of 1.00 years of collision data Bold/Underline = Calculated collision rate is higher than the expected rate for a similar roadway type LEGEND
ADT: Average Daily Traffic (in vehicles per day, both directions of traffic) A/NNM: Accidents Per Ivillion Vehicle Niles
D: Divided
U: Undivided
22 0
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING $ TRAFFIC SURVEY srEE1
for SPEED LIMITS E�
DAR
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
Table 7: Collision Data Summary and Analysis for Segments 26-50
ROADWAY
INFORMATION
Se�mentLJmlts..............................Roadway
TFP_e_..�
L...__......Co.JJslon.Rate._...._...._
...._...............
; Direction
i Length
ADT
Numberof ;
;
5 No.
From To
NO" °f,
Division
of Travel
(mi.)
(Vpd)
s�!
Collisions '
Expected i
Calculated
Street
Lanes f
(A/MVM)
(A/MVM)
Avenue E
26 !16thSt Oak Glen Rd
2 U
i EJW
1.23 i 4,486
3 1
0.90 1
0.30 Avenue E
27 30ak Glen Rd 8th St
2/4
U
EIW
0.75 I
7,977
1 0.90
0.09 Avenue E
28 IBth St California St
3 2
3 U
E/W
1.79 1 7,925
,
4 0.90
0.15 Avenue E
29 :California St Fremont St
2 U
3 j EIW
? 0.50
2,661
0 j
0.90 ;
2.00 Avenue H
30 `Sth Place '2nd St
2 U
ENV
0.74 5,125
0 0.90
0.00 Avenue H
i
31 ;2nd St BryantSt2
U
ENV
i 0.50
i
4,501
1 0.90
0.24 Avenue H
32 :Bryant St 'Holmes St
2 1
U
ENV
0.75 4,196
0 0.90
0.00 Bella Vista Drive
33 {Fremont St Holmes St
2 U
EJW
0.25 1,119
0 I
0.90 i
0.00 Bryant Street
34 ;North (Sty Limits :Oak Glen Rd
I
4/2
D
WS
2.22 i 17,851
7 7
i
1.09 i
0.10 Bryant Street
35 i Oak Glen Rd Date Ave
4 D
WS
0.50 16,197
I
1 !
�
1.09 0.07
Bryant Street
i 1
36 ;Date Ave Yucaipa Blvd
4 D
WS
0.50 !
1 11.781
1 ;
1.09 0.09
Bryant Street
Wddwood Canyon
37 iYucaipa Blvd
2 U
WS
1.25 ? 9,350
0 I
0.90 i
0.00 !Rd
i
I
Bryant Street
Wil dw ood Canyon
38 rRd :County Line Rd
!
2 i
U
I WS
0.92 7,128
1 0.90
0.08 California Street
j
39 !Date Ave Yucaipa Blvd
2 U
WS
i 0.50
1,251
3 0 i
I
0.90 i
0.00 California Street
40 Yucaipa Blvd 'Ave B
2 U
WS
0.14 4,495
0 ?
0.90 0.00
California Street
41 Ave �Ave E
2 '
LVD
WS
0.35 5,069
0 ;
!
0.90 0.00
California Street
W;Idwood Canyon
42 Ave E
4 U
WS
j 0.75
6,197
1 0.73
0.12 1
1 Wildwood Canyon
California Street
43� Ave H
4 U
WS
9 0.54
i 4,945
I
2 j
0.73 :
0.41 California Street
44 Ave H County Line Rd
2 I
U
i WS
i 0.39
j 3,431
3 1 3
0.90 0.41
Calimesa Boulevard
Wddwood Canyon
45 ;Oak Glen Rd iRd
2 U
II
E/W
1.19 15,948
6 0.90
0.17 I
Calimesa Boulevard
Wi dw ood Canyon
46 ! :County Line Rd
4/2
D/U
j Hw
1.07 10,184
5 1.09
0.25 jRd
Campus Drive
47 ISand Canyon Rd "U" Ben (Md-way)
2 U
i EnN
0.40 3,806
0 i
0.90 0.00
Campus Drive
3 48 1"U" Ben (rAd-way) Sand Canyon Rd
�
2 I
U
I
WS
; 0.69
2,292
0 0.90
0.00 Chapman Heights
49 ;Sand Canyon Rd 10th St
2 U
: E/W
t 1.50
5,212
2 0.90
0.14 Road
Chapman Heights
50 i 10th St !Oak Glen Rd
2 U
j E/VY
0.65 5,827
2 0.90
0.29 Road
1 3
I
i
23 a
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RAOAfl
Table 8: Collision Data Summary and Analysis for Segments 51-75 No.
ROADWAY
ant Limits
INFORM A TION
Roadway Type
I 1i
i Direction Length i ADT
I of Trave (mi.) (vpd)
I
COLLISION
Numberof
Collisions231
ANALYSIS
I Collision Rate
I
Expected' Calculateds
From TO
No. of
Division
Street
Lanes
I
i
("VM) (AIMVM)
Colorado Street
51 Oak Glen Rd 1"woo' Canyon
4 U
W 1.62 1,364
4 1.09
0.99 iRd
County Line Road
52 11-110 Freeway 3rd St
2 LYD
ENV 1.00 7.319
1 I 0.90
0.07 County Line Road
53 !3rcl St Bryant St
2 U
ENV 0.75 4.707
0 0.90
0.00 County Line Road
54 iBryantSt lWsaGrandeDr
2 u
ENV 0.92 3,784
0 0.90
j 0.00
Date Avenue
55 3rd St Bryant St
2 U
1 EIW 0.76 i 1,816
0 0.90
0.00 Date Avenue
56 Bryant St ,Fremont St
2 U
PIN 0.50 11 1,930
0 0.90
0.00 Date Avenue
57 1Fremont St Pendleton Rd
2 U
E(W 0.38 j 908
0 0.90
0.00 Douglas Street
58 Wi
iDateAveklwoalCanyon
2 U
NS 1.75 465
4 0.90
L69
Rd
Douglas Street
59 Ave H County Line Rd
2 U
NS 0.38 433
0 0.90
i 0.00
Dunlap Boulevard
60 Ave E :16th St
2 U
FJW 0.84 1,225
0 0.90
0.00 Dunlap Boulevard
61 116th St 114th St (End)
2 L)
ENV 0.52 i 1,521
0 0.90
0.00 Fir Avenue
62 IJefferson St Bryant St
2 U
1 ENV 0.99 192
1 0.90
1 2.88-
Fir Avenue
63 Bryant St Sunnyside Dr
2 U
i ENV i 0.50 1 1,688
0 0.90
0.00 Fremont Street
64 Date Ave Yucaipa Blvd
�,Yucaipa
2 ,
NS 0.45 1,055
3 0.90
3.46 Fremont Street
65 Blvd !Ave E
2 Ll
NS 0.59 1,367
0 0.90
0.00 Fremont Street
66 Ave E Bella Vista Dr
2 U
NS 0.52 1,530
0 0.90
0.00 Fremont Street
67 Ave H jCounty Line Rd
2 U
NIS i 0.39 i 895
0 0.90
0.00 Fremont Street
68 Oak Glen Rd Ivy Ave
2 U
NS i 1.50 i 429
1 0.90
0.85 Grape Avenue
69 Bryant St jFlollyAve
2 U
E1W 0.60 650
0 0.90
0.00 Holmes Street
70 Bella Vista Or Wildw ood Canyon
2 L1
WS i 0.24 I 1,621
0 0.90 I
0.00 Rd
Ivy Avenue
71 Juniper Ave jFremont St
2 u
8W 0.50 i 826
3 0.90
3.98 Kentucky Street
72 112th
St Dunlap Blvd
2 Ll
FJW 0.95 I 1,777
0 0.90 I
0.00 Sthwest City
Live Oak Canyon Road
73 'Outer
Hwy 10 Uouts
ni
2 U
I
ENV0.90 1 5.665
1 0.90
0.11 f
Mesa Grande Drive
74 Wildwood Canyon County Line Rd
Rd
2 U
NS 1.05 2,219
0 0.90 i
0.00 Nebraska Street
I
i
75 17th
Wildw ood Canyon
Place
2 U
EIW 0.11 281
0 j
0.90 1
0.00 0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 24
= f - 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY ENT E6 for SPEED LIMITS ar
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA waonR
Table 9: Collision Data Summary and Analysis for Segments 76-100 Street
ROADWAY
S mentLimits
a.__.... ......_._ ..............._......_..._
No.
From r To
3 INFORM
Roadwa T e
_.._... ---Y._...YP......
No. o/ !
I Division
Lanes
i
I Direction
' of Travel
Length ADT
r (mi.) (vpd)
CcIIlsfanRate
- - _.__...__.... .....
Numberof i 4 s
za i Expected Calculated
Collisions "
(AIMVM) (A/MVM)
Oak Glen Road
i Wiklw ood Canyon
76 i�
(South City Lints
2 U
WS
0.21 t 3,634
0 0.90
0.00 Oak Glen Road
77 !Northeast City Units
Cherry Croft Dr
2 U
WS
1.95 ! 2,586
2 j 0.90
0.22 Oak Glen Road
Cherry Croft
78 !
Bryant St
2 U
WS
0.86 1, 5,427
I
1 I 0.90
0.12 jDr/Jefferson St
I
I
Oak Glen Road
79 !Bryant St
I5thSt
4 D
WS
1.28 22,810
2 1.09
0.04 Oak Glen Road
80 15lhSt
Yucaipa Blvd
4 D
WS
1.28 i 18.732
j
6 ' 1.09
0.14 Oak Glen Road
81 ;Yucaipa Blvd
3Ave E
4 ' D
NIS
0.79 i 15,810
4 i 1.09
0.18 Oak Glen Road
i
82 'Ave E
Cafirresa Blvd
4 D
WS
0.90 j 19,151
1 4 i 1.09
0.13 Oakwood Circle
83 ?Crafton F®s Dr (E)
jCrafton 1-lills Dr (W)
!7j
2 U
WS
4 0.39 181
0 0.90
0.00 Overcrest Drive
84 Tennesse St
3Flanpton 17d
11 z
I
u
ws
3 0.46 j 1,128
1 0.90
1.06 Sand Canyon Road
85 North Oty Units
lYucaipa Blvd
j
4 D
NIS
0.94 11,670
2 1.09
0.10 Sunnyside Drive
86 !Oak Glen Rd
j
!Bryant St
2 U
WS
I
I i
0.57 i 2.365
1 0.90
0.41 I
l
Tennesse Street
87 Yucaipa Blvd
18th St
2 U
W
E/W
0.62 389
1 0.90
2.27 I
i71hSt
Washington Drive
88 9thSt
2 U
FJW
0.68 628
0 0.90
0.00 Wildwood Canyon Road
89 jCalirresaBlvd
15th St
'
2 LVD ;
E/W
E
1.22 11,881
!
4 0.90
0.15 Wildwood Canyon Road
90 5thSt
Bryant St
2 U
FJW
!
1.26 10,091
)
2 0.90
0.09 Wildwood Canyon Road
3 3
91 'Bryant St
formes St
2 U
'
i ENV
0.75 6,832
2 0.90
0.21 Wildwood Canyon Road
92 i Holmes St
Mesa Grande Dr
2 D ;
E/W
0.80 6,479
�
0 0.90
0.00 Wildwood Canyon Road
93 Mesa Grande Or
iOak Mesa Dr
2 U
f
ENV
1 1.03 ! 5,326
1 - 0.90
0.10 Wildwood Canyon Road
94 !Oak Mesa Or
?Oak Glen Rd
2 U
Efw
1.58 3,571
I
0 0.90
I 0,00
Yucaipa Boulevard
95 l-10 Freeway
Sand Canyon Rd
4 D j
ENV
i
i
1.50 ; 21,775
4 1.09
0.07 Yucaipa Boulevard
96 ;Sand Canyon Rd
Oak Glen Rd
6 D
ElVV
1.29 i 26,814
7 1.09
0.11 Yucaipa Boulevard
97 Oak Glen Rd
5th St
6 D
E/W
i
1.21 , 26,261
a
11 1.09
0.19 Yucaipa Boulevard
98 ;5thSt
2ndSt
4/2
D
E/W
i
I 0.75 i 21,134
6 1.09
0.21 Yucaipa Boulevard
99 12nd St
Bryant St
2 LID
E/W
i
` 0.50 j 9.498
1 i 0.90
0.12 Yucaipa Boulevard
I
100!Bryant St
Fremont St
2 U
E/W
0.51 i 1,618
'
0 0.90
0.00 25
l; MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY if SPEED
for SPEED LIMITS ENFOflCED
BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA fl;
Survey of Street Segments
Minagar & Associates, Inc. staff also evaluated each of the 100 roadway segments to observe the following existing roadway, roadside and traffic conditions, and identify individual or combined factors which may not be readily apparent to drivers.
Segment length
Roadway pavement width
Number of travel lanes
Center median division
Type and frequency of traffic controls on the primary road Sight distance and visibility of driveways and side street traffic due to:
o Horizontal curvature
o Vertical alignment and grade shifts
o On -street parking
o Large street trees planted in the median and/or adjacent parkway(s) o Two-way left turn traffic in the center lane
o Offset or skewed intersection approaches
Roadway lighting
Abutting land use density and property access along the roadway Commercial and residential driveway spacing
Bicyclists and bike lanes/routes
Heavy vehicle, golf cart, and NEV/LSV traffic
Pedestrians, crosswalks, sidewalks, school children walking along roadway due to the absence or discontinuity of sidewalks
These characteristics are described for each segment in the summary sheets provided in Appendix C.
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 26
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY FEE]
for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RABAA
6 — Engineering & Traffic Survey Results and Recommendations This Engineering & Traffic Survey is intended to establish prima facie speed limits for 100 surveyed roadway segments in the City of Yucaipa, based on a thorough evaluation of the collected data and standard speed zoning practice. Prima Facie speed limits serve to advise drivers and law enforcement of what is the reasonable and prudent speed under normal conditions.
The field radar -measured 851h percentile speed was rounded to the nearest upper or lower 5-MPH increment, as appropriate, and used as the recommended posted speed limit. Where other significant factors were demonstrated, such as an above -average collision rate; traffic, roadway and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and/or the need to consider legal prima facie speed limits, the presumptive speed limit was adjusted upward or downward by a 5 mile per hour increment to the final recommended posted speed. In some cases where the roadway segment is located along a "local street" as designated by the California Road System (CRS), several of the existing posted speed limits are proposed to maintain as -is, notwithstanding presumptive posted speed limit, in order to meet the needs of the local community and prevailing road users in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC (§40802, §22358, §22352, §22354, §22357, and 22358.3) allowing the local authority to do so.
The findings of this E&TS indicate that currently posted speed limits on 90 of the 100 surveyed segments will not change, and will remain as documented and posted to allow for continued radar enforcement until the next renewal of posted speeds is required during the next validation of this E&TS.
2 segments are recommended to have a decrease in posted speed limit and 2 segments are recommended for an increase from their existing posted speed limits; 6 of these segments require the posting of a speed limit.
See Appendix B for a summary of the above findings and recommendations for each segment. 27 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
L a 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY SPEE°
ENfOR°ED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RaDeR
7 — Applicable Vehicle Codes
The following codes were considered relevant in preparing the E&T Survey Report as provided in the 2023 California Vehicle Code (CVC):
■ 235 Business District
A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
IN 240 Business and Residence Districts: Determination
In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the following limitations shall apply and qualify the definitions in Sections 235 & 515:
(a) No building shall be regarded unless its entrance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway. (b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be regarded for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district. (c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs, & public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures. (d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
■ 515 Residence District
A "residence district' is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one -quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
(0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 28
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY ESPEED
NFDflCED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
fl
CITY OF YUCAIPA. CA RADA
■ 627 Engineering and Traffic Survey
(a) "Engineering and traffic survey," as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities. (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
(2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
(c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is
occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or
business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one -quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
(Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 690, Sec. 1. (AB 43) Effective January 1, 2022.) ■ 21400 Uniform Standards
(a) The Department of Transportation shall, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to this code, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs placed pursuant to Section 21364.
(b) The Department of Transportation shall, after notice and public hearing, determine and publicize the specifications for uniform types of warning MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 29
7::Q 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY TPsrEED ENFDflCED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
signs, lights, and devices to be placed upon a highway by a person engaged in performing work that interferes with or endangers the safe movement of traffic upon that highway.
(c) Only those signs, lights, and devices as are provided for in this section shall be placed upon a highway to warn traffic of work that is being performed on the highway.
(d) Control devices or markings installed upon traffic barriers on or after January 1, 1984, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications required by this section.
(Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 690, Sec. 2. (AB 43) Effective January 1, 2022.) ■ 22349 Maximum Speed Limit
(a) Except as provided in Section 22356, no person may drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person may drive a vehicle upon a two-lane, undivided highway at a speed greater than 55 miles per hour unless that highway, or portion thereof, has been posted for a higher speed by the Department of Transportation or appropriate local agency upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. For purposes of this subdivision, the following apply:
(1) A two-lane, undivided highway is a highway with not more than one through lane of travel in each direction.
(2) Passing lanes may not be considered when determining the number of through lanes.
(c) It is the intent of the Legislature that there be reasonable signing on affected two-lane, undivided highways described in subdivision (b) in continuing the 55 miles -per -hour speed limit, including placing signs at county boundaries to the extent possible, and at other appropriate locations.
(Amended by Stats. 1999, Ch. 724, Sec. 41. Effective January 1, 2000.) ■ 22350
Basic Speed Law
No person shall drive a vehicle upon a
highway at a speed greater than is
reasonable or prudent having due regard for
weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the
surface and width of, the highway, and in no
event at a speed which endangers the safety
of persons or property.
"No Person Shall Drive a
Vehicle Upon a Highway at a
Speed Greater Than is
Reasonable or Prudent..."
Basic Speed Law
California Vehicle Code (CVC)
D 11 / Ch 7 / Art 1 / §22350
(Amended by Stats. 1999, Ch. 724, Sec. 41. Effective Jan. 1, 2000.) ■ 22351 Speed Law Violations
(a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law. (b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 30
::. ,� 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
SPEED
ENFORCED
BY
RADAR
prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
■ 22352 Prima Facie Speed Limits
(a) The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(1) Fifteen miles per hour:
(A) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
B Wh t t t' f h' h i 'f d th
25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT
"When approaching
or passing a school...
posted with a
standard `SCHOOL'
warning sign, while
children are going to
or leaving the
school... during
school hours."
- Prima Facie Speed
Limits: 25mph, California
Vehicle Code (CVC), D11
/ Ch7 / Art1 / §22352
( ) en raversing any" ersec ion o ig ways uring e
last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
(C) On any alley.
(2) Twenty-five miles per hour:
(A) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning
sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard
"SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(B) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going Anbk MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 31
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY TP r TEE]
ENFORCED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
Pool"' R
CITY OF YUCAIPA. CA RADA
to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning
sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard
"SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (C) When passing
a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may
request grant funding from the Active Transportation
Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section
2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.
(Amended by Stats. 20121, Ch. 690, Sec. 3 (AB 43) Effective Jan. 1, 2022.) ■ 22357 Increase of Local Speed Limits to 65 Miles Per Hour (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.
(Repealed (in Sec. 28) and added by Stats. 1995, Ch. 766, Sec. 29. Effective January 1, 1996. This section became operative, by its own provisions, on the date described in Section 22366.) aMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 32
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY SPEED
for SPEED LIMITS ERFDRCED
BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA. CA RaoaR
■ 22357.1 Decrease Near Children's Playgrounds
Notwithstanding Section 22357, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, set a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on any street, other than a state highway, adjacent to any children's playground in a public park but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use the facilities. The 25 mile per hour speed limit shall be effective when signs giving notice of the speed limit are posted.
(Added by Stats. 1989, Ch. 508, Sec. 1.)
■ 22358 Decrease of Local Speed Limits
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.
(Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 690, Sec. 5 (AB43) Effective Jan. 1, 2022.) ■ 22358.4 Decrease of Local Limits Near Schools or Senior Centers (a) (1) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey.
(2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 33
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY SPEED
ENFORCED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA. CA flAUAA
school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period.
The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour. (B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not
separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other
physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that
indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour.
(2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the school zone.
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel. (4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration.
(5) (A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
34 ■
■
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS
CITY OF YUCAIPA. CA
SPEED
ENFORCED
BY
flADAfl
(C) For purposes of subparagraph (8) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from the school grounds.
(D) A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs incurred by the department under this subdivision.
(Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 208, Sec. 15. (AB 2906) Effective January 1, 2017.) 22358.5 Downward Speed Zoning
It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditionc cu irh ac Wirlth ri irvafi inn grade and surface conditions, or any other
condition readily apparent to a driver, in the
absence of other factors, would not require
special downward speed zoning, as the basic
rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as
to such conditions.
(Added by Stats. 1989, Ch. 11.)
22359 Boundary Line Streets
With respect to boundary line streets and
highways where portions thereof are within
different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted
under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be
effective as to any such portion until all
"No ordinance... shall be
effective... until all
authorities having
jurisdiction of the portions
of the street concerned
have approved the same."
(Does not include boundary
line streets consisting of
separate roadways within
different jurisdictions)
authorities having Jurisdiction of the portions of
the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.
(Amended by Stats. 163, Ch. 209.)
■ 22361 Multiple -Lane Highways
On multiple -lane highways with two or more separate roadways different prima facie speed limits may be established for different
roadways under any of the procedures specified
in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.
(Amended by Stats. 1963, Ch. 209.)
■ 40801 Speed Trap Prohibition
No peace officer or other person shall use a
speed trap in arresting, or participating or
assisting in the arrest of, any person for any
alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed
trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed
of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or
prosecution under this code.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
aMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
"No peace officer or
other person shall use a
speed trap in
arresting... any person for
any alleged violation of
this code, nor shall any
speed trap be used in
securing evidence as to
the speed of any
vehicle..."
- Speed Trap Prohibition
California Vehicle Code (CVC)
D171 Ch3 /Art1 / §40801
35 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
for SPEED LIMITS
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
ENFORCED
Rr
RADAfl
■ 40802 Speed Traps
(a) A "speed
trap" is either of the following:
(1)
A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
(2)
A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. (b) (1)
For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as "local" on the "California Road System Maps," that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. When a street or road does not appear on the "California Road System Maps," it may be defined as a "local street or road" if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length.
Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2)
For purposes of this section, "school zone" means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone" also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign.
(3)
For purposes of this section, "senior zone" means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SENIOR" warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4)
For purposes of this section, "business activity district" means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES,
INC. 36
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY ENSPEED
FORCED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
rITV (W VI IrAIPA rn RADAR
in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section.
(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was
approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in
subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the
Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with
subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of
subparagraph (D).
(ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(d) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise
determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be
calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
(B)
(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway
with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of
subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established
37 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Ll2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY F
for SPEED LIMITS ENFORCED
BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if
that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an
engineering and traffic survey conducted within one
of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit
involves the use of radar or any other electronic
device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(1) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven
years.
(II) If an engineering and traffic survey was
conducted more than seven years prior to the
date of the alleged violation, and a registered
engineer evaluates the section of the
highway and determines that no significant
changes in roadway or traffic conditions have
occurred, including, but not limited to,
changes in adjoining property or land use,
roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years.
(ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity
district, or speed limit adopted under Section
22358.7 or 22358.8.
(Amended by Stats. 2022, Ch. 406, Sec. 5. (AB 1938) Effective January 1, 2023.) ■ 40803 Speed Trap Evidence
(a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speedtrap. (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speedtrap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
(Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 124, Sec. 147. Effective January 1, 1997.) aMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 38
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY TP
[.41111�1�11Lfor SPEED LIMITS CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
8 - References
1. 2023 California Vehicle Codes (CVC)
- Division 1: Words and Phrases Defined. §100-681
- Division 11: Rules of the Road. Chapter 7, Article 1: Generally (Speed Laws). §22348- 22413
- Division 17: Offenses and Prosecution. Chapter 3, Article 1: Prosecutions Under Code. §40800-40808
2. California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) Rev. 7, Mar. 2023 - Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), as amended for use in California. - Chapter 2B: Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates
- Sections 2B.13 and 2B.18
3. Federal Highway Administration Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (FHWA MUTCD, 11th Edition, Dec. 2023)
4. Citywide Engineering & Traffic Survey (E&TS) Reports Conducted and Prepared by Minagar & Associates, Inc.
Minagar & Associates, Inc.'s 26 Citywide E&TS Projects in Southern California # of Speed
Agency
County
Contract
MUTCD Version
Zone
Year
Segments
1. City of Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
2024
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 7, 2023)
118
2. City of Rancho Mirage
Riverside
2023
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 7, 2023)
67 3.
City of Solana Beach
San Diego
2023
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 7, 2023)
29 4.
®
City of Needles
San Bernardino
2022
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 6, 2021)
21 5.
;;a,
City of Colton
San Bernardino
2022
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 6, 2021)
44 6.
�'
City of South Gate
Los Angeles
2021-2022
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 6, 2021)
49 7.
lb
City of Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
2021-2022
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 6, 2021)
115
8 ''
City of Pomona
Los Angeles
2020-2021
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 5, 2020)
131
9. ;; „
City of Beaumont
Riverside
2017-2018
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 2, 2017)
48 10.
City of Bell
Los Angeles
2017
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 2, 2017)
14 11.
(
City of Rancho Mirage
Riverside
2017
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 2, 2017)
66 12.
City of Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
2016-2017
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev. 1, 2015)
115
13. City of South Pasadena
Los Angeles
2014-2015
CAMUTCD 2014
60 14.
City of Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
2014
CAMUTCD 2012
115
15. ;
City of Colton
San Bernardino
2013-2014
CAMUTCD 2012
44 16.
City of Culver City
Los Angeles
2013
CAMUTCD 2012
70 17.
t' -'
City of Lawndale
Los Angeles
2013
CAMUTCD 2012
22 18.
City of South Pasadena
Los Angeles
2012
CAMUTCD 2012
5 19.
5 p
City of San Marino
Los Angeles
2011
CAMUTCD 2010
59 20.
City of South Pasadena
Los Angeles
2010
CAMUTCD 2010
6 21.
::
City of Manhattan Beach
Los Angeles
2010
CAMUTCD 2010 (2009 Rev.)
51 22.
City of Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
2009
CAMUTCD 2006
115
23. City of Baldwin Park
Los Angeles
2009
CAMUTCD 2006
54 24.
,}
City of Rancho Santa Margarita
Orange County
2004
MUTCD 2003 (CA Supp.)
11 25.
j
City of Baldwin Park
Los Angeles
2004
MUTCD (CA Supp.)
54 26.
,.;;
: City of Redondo Beach
Los Angeles
2003
MUTCD
57 E&TS Projects - Total Radar Speed Zone Segments Surveyed 1,589
39 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY Z-K�ID
for SPEED LIMITS CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
Appendix A
Map of Recommended Speed Limits
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
w
D
U)
U_
M
LLLL
LG
ca
z
2 w
w
IZ
V
Z a
W C
LU
J C
F" w >
M ac
N Cl)
>
L F
CD
N 0 C
I
li
r
z
z
=o
O w
U H
Q IL
0 Z�O Q O
Z U
w Z_
m Z
Z
Q
rn
0 1S NOSN3333f
N z
w J
> uj
L
> c�
U
a
u. O
1S 1NVANS
QNO
C
301SANns
.
�Q
O
`�f
�7
r
C)
(—
�z 0
O F
O Q
z
Z o
acL
ZO
-
D�Z
mz
r
C
G
Z
�
�a
m
w
-
r r
d
-
C
N
a
�=
Ma
O
o
y
w
m
O
' L
O
O
to
U
d
u, n=
N
0 Q
0 to
>
>
J
LU m
J
aJ
w Q
• ui
, m
w
o >
w
>
a1S 1NOW3N:l
is svlonoa
V
19 1NVANS
1S VINNOAIIVO
C
1S anz O
z
O
1S m,£
. Itu
� ON
M
N
O
N
N
N
w
m
w
U
w
0 A4 1
oaf
1S S3WlOH
11S
1NOMN3
CDZ oa
i
N W w
issvlonoo
d z W
1S iNVANS
>
1S VINNOMWO
lZ �
.. d
a
U. w
0 a —
1 0
0 } � U.
x
UFR'
LLI
1S NiS
ANNIL
I
V
II
Z
IIj
�
N � 1
i
V I
i
z = r 1
o� z 1
ti =i
r
w ~ O'+bJ\b Z I Z
Qm
CN 1Q
uw
Q iU
w
LU
c
z
W i
z
y
~ l
fn
LL O
O Z
Q I>
rn I tY
1saa�aan
i"r � J
U w
1 1
1 H�
I
(1)`
r
a
c�
Q
ca
a
z
;~ 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY srEED
ENFDACED
for SPEED LIMITS RY
flADAR
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
Appendix B
Summary of Recommended Changes to
Posted Speed Limits
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY SPEED
ENFORCED
for SPEED LIMITS Rr
RhDAR
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
Street
No.
SEGMENT INFORMATION
Limits
From To
Ex
SPEED ZONING
ANALYSIS
Speed Limit (mph)
85th Rec. Change
2nd Street
1 Date Ave
Yucaipa Blvd
30 36
30 -
2nd Street
2 Yucaipa Blvd
Wildwood Canyon Rd
35 42
35 3rd Street
3 Date Ave
Yucaipa Blvd
30 s
36 [ 30
3rd Street
4 Yucaipa Blvd
Wildwood Canyon Rd
35 42
35 -
3rd Street
5 Wildwood Canyon Rd
€ County Line Rd
35 42
€ 35
4th Street
6 Yucaipa Blvd
Wildwood Canyon Rd
35 43
35 5th Street
7 Oak Glen Rd
Yucaipa Blvd
45 50
45 5th Street
8 Yucaipa Blvd
Wildwood Canyon Rd
40 €
42 € 40
5th Street
9 Wildwood Canyon Rd
County Line Rd
35 39
! 35
6th Street
10 Yucaipa Blvd
Ave E
35 44
35 6th Street
11 Ave E
Wildwood Canyon Rd
35 44
35 7th Street
12 Yucaipa Blvd
Enoch Ave
35 [ 41
35 -
8th Street
13 Liberty Rd
Ave E
30 40
30 10th Street
14 Chapman Heights Rd
Yucaipa Blvd
35 i 43
35 10th Street
15 Yucaipa Blvd
Oak Glen Rd
35 39
35 11th Street
16 Yucaipa Blvd
Ave D
30 34
30 12th Street
17 [ Yucaipa Blvd
Ave E
35 39
35 -
13th Street
18 Yucaipa Blvd
Ave E
35 40
35 13th Street
19 f Ave E
Oak Glen Rd
35 ' 41
35 14th Street
20 Yucaipa Blvd
Oak Glen Rd
35 [ 41
35 15th Street
21 ? Yucaipa Blvd
Kentucky St
35 34
35 16th Street
22 Yucaipa Blvd
Outer Hwy 10
35 37
35 Avenue D
23 17th St
13th St
35 35
35 Avenue D
24 13th St
Oak Glen Rd
35 38
i 35
Avenue E
25 € Yucaipa Blvd
16th St
35 41
35 Ex: Existing Prima Facie Speed Limit
85th: Eighty-fifth Percentile Survey Speed
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY ENrDALED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
I, CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
INFORMA VON
SPEEDSEGMENT
ZONING
ANALYSIS
Limits
Speed Limit (mph)
No.
From
To
Street
Ex
85th
Rec. Change
Avenue E
26 16th St
Oak Glen Rd
35 39
35 Avenue E
27 Oak Glen Rd
8th St
40 48
i 40
Avenue E
28 8th St
California St
35 i
41 35
Avenue E
29 California St
Fremont St
25 41
I 30
Increase
Avenue H
30 5th Place
2nd St
35 41
35 Avenue H
31 2nd St
Bryant St
35 !
39 35
Avenue H
32 Bryant St
Holmes St
35 42
35 Bella Vista Drive
33 s
Fremont St
Holmes St
35 40
35 Bryant Street
34 North City Limits
Oak Glen Rd
50 53
i 50
Bryant Street
35 `
Oak Glen Rd
Date Ave
45 49
45 Bryant Street
36 i
Date Ave
? Yucaipa Blvd
45 E
47 45
Bryant Street
37 Yucaipa Blvd
Wildwood Canyon Rd
35 42
f 35
Bryant Street
38 Wildwood Canyon Rd
€ County Line Rd
35 37
35 California Street
39 f
Date Ave
Yucaipa Blvd
35 i
38 [ 35
California Street
40 Yucaipa Blvd
f Ave B
25 (
24 i 25
California Street
41 [
Ave B
Ave E
25 35
25 California Street
42 Ave E
Wildwood Canyon Rd
40 ':
48 _ 40
California Street
43 f
Wildwood Canyon Rd
€ Ave H
35 43
= 35
California Street
44 Ave H
County Line Rd
35 [
43 35
Calimesa Boulevard
45 Oak Glen Rd
Wildwood Canyon Rd
50 52
50 Calimesa Boulevard
46 Wildwood Canyon Rd
County Line Rd
50 48
50 Campus Drive
47 Sand Canyon Rd
"U" Bend (Mid -way)
35 29
[ 30
Decrease
Campus Drive
48 "U" Bend (Mid -way)
Sand Canyon Rd
25 43
25 Chapman Heights Road
49 Sand Canyon Rd
10th St
40 50
i 40
Chapman Heights Road
50 10th St
Oak Glen Rd
35 42
f 35
Ex: Existing Prima Facie Speed Limit
85th: Eighty-fifth Percentile Survey Speed
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
(0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
3 2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY TP ENFORCED for SPEED LIMITSPoll" BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA !;;
INFORMATIONSEGMENT
SPEED ANALYSIS
No.
Limits
Speed
Limit (mph)
From
To
Street
Ex
85th
Rec. Change
Colorado Street
51 f
Oak Glen Rd
Wildwood Canyon Rd
35 38
35 -
County Line Road
52 1-10 Freeway
3rd St
35 41
35 County Line Road
53 3rd St
Bryant St
35 38
[ 35
County Line Road
54 Bryant St
Mesa Grande Dr
N/P
43 [ 40
Date Avenue
55 3rd St
Bryant St
25 35
25 Date Avenue
56 Bryant St
Fremont St
25 40
30 Increase
Date Avenue
57 Fremont St
Pendleton Rd
25 39
25 Douglas Street
58 Date Ave
Wildwood Canyon Rd
25 29
25 Douglas Street
59 Ave H
County Line Rd
N/P
41 40
Dunlap Boulevard
60 [
Ave E
16th St
40 46
40 Dunlap Boulevard
61 €
16th St
14th St (End)
40 38
[ 40
Fir Avenue
62 Jefferson St
Bryant St
25 30
25 Fir Avenue
63 Bryant St
Sunnyside Dr
N/P
37 35
Fremont Street
64 Date Ave
Yucaipa Blvd
35 43
35 Fremont Street
65 Yucaipa Blvd
Ave E
30 36 ':
30 Fremont Street
66 Ave E
Bella Vista Dr
35 €
36 €
35 Fremont Street
67 Ave H
County Line Rd
35 €
37 €
35 Fremont Street
68 Oak Glen Rd
Ivy Ave
25 36
25 Grape Avenue
69 Bryant St
Holly Ave
N/P
37 35
Holmes Street
70 Bella Vista Dr
Wildwood Canyon Rd
35 40
35 -
Ivy Avenue
71 Juniper Ave
Fremont St
30 42
30 -
Kentucky Street
72 12th St
Dunlap Blvd
N/P
37 35
-
Live Oak Canyon Road
73 Outer Hwy 10
Southwest City Limits
40 49
40 Mesa Grande Drive
74 [
Wildwood Canyon Rd
! County Line Rd
40 42
40 Nebraska Street
75 €
7th Place
Wildwood Canyon Rd
25 29
25 -
Ex: Existing Prima Facie Speed Limit
85th: Eighty-fifth Percentile Survey Speed
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Adlbk
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY ENFOflCED
for SPEED LIMITS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
SPEED
ZONING
ANALYSIS
No.
Limits
Speed
Limit (mph)
From
To
Street
Ex
85th
Rec. Change
Oak Glen Road
76 Wildwood Canyon Rd
South City Limits
N/P
45 40
Oak Glen Road
77 Northeast City Limits
Cherry Croft Dr
50 ?
52 j 50
Oak Glen Road
78 :Cherry
Croft
Bryant St
50 50
50 Dr/Jefferson St
Oak Glen Road
79 Bryant St
5th St
45 48
45 Oak Glen Road
80 5th St
Yucaipa Blvd
45 54
45 Oak Glen Road
81 Yucaipa Blvd
Ave E
40 i
45 40
Oak Glen Road
82 ?
Ave E
Calimesa Blvd
45 [
48 45
Oakwood Circle
83 Grafton Hills Dr (E)
Grafton Hills Dr (W)
25 33
25 Overcrest Drive
84 s
Tennessee St
Hampton Rd
35 39
35 -
Sand Canyon Road
85 North City Limits
Yucaipa Blvd
50 45
45 Decrease
Sunnyside Drive
86 Oak Glen Rd
Bryant St
25 28
25 -
Tennessee Street
87 Yucaipa Blvd
18th St
35 43
35 -
Washington Drive
88 9th St
7th St
30 [
35 [ 30
-
Wildwood Canyon Road
89 Calimesa Blvd
5th St
40 [
46 40
-
Wildwood Canyon Road
90 5th St
Bryant St
40 47
i 40
Wildwood Canyon Road
91 €
Bryant St
Holmes St
45 ':
46 45
Wildwood Canyon Road
92 Holmes St
Mesa Grande Dr
45 50
45 Wildwood Canyon Road
93 Mesa Grande Dr
Oak Mesa Dr
45 48
45 Wildwood Canyon Road
94 Oak Mesa Dr
Oak Glen Rd
45 €
48 45
Yucaipa Boulevard
95 1-10 Freeway
Sand Canyon Rd
45 i
51 45
Yucaipa Boulevard
96 Sand Canyon Rd
Oak Glen Rd
40 44
40 Yucaipa Boulevard
97 Oak Glen Rd
5th St
40 €
46 40
Yucaipa Boulevard
98 5th St
2nd St
35 40
35 Yucaipa Boulevard
99 €
2nd St
Bryant St
25 32
25 Yucaipa Boulevard
100
Bryant St
Fremont St
35 37
35 Ex: Existing Prima Facie Speed Limit
85th: Eighty-fifth Percentile Survey
Speed
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2023 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING $ TRAFFIC SURVEY ENSPEED
FORCED
G 1 for SPEED LIMITS BY
4 CITY OF YUCAIPA. CA RADAR
Appendix F
Speed Gun Calibration Certification
0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
RHFInc. TESTED TO NHTSA SPECIFICATIONS / IACP CRITICAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Radar (NHTSA) National Highway and Traffic -Safety Administration. (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police.
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified independent testing and repair facility.
Westminster, Calif. 92683
1 TEST ID
Date eive� r�U
CertificationNyprb!JJ
Make
Model Stal •er-
Type (I -IV)
Directional radar
Same direction
2 DEVICE ID
Applied Concepts
Dual SL or DSR
I IV
❑ Yes No J..
oYes ❑ No
Cgytptir .4-qitS/Jd� j,.-
Antenna-1 S/N �;3 .� t�' y
Antenna-2 S/N
§ 2.4 / § 5.4
LAW jsp �` t
Last date calib.
Freq. (Hz)
Speet mph)
Meas j (IIzZ,
3 TUNING FORK
CALIBRATION
/ L
OPA�S
FAIL
Ht egd f rk S
�rk f
Last date calib.
y•
Freq. z
M)
See m h
P'� P)
M tugd�( }77
t� f
Lo fork
Hith fork
Fork speed (mph)
-----
25 40
Stationary mode
Disp. Speed (mph}
���
§ 2.5 / § 5.5
4 RADAR DEVICE
TUNING FORK
PAS '
FAIL.
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected,
Displayed.
TESTS
Opposite Direction
(1-1i fork - Lo fork)
(mph) 15
(mph) i
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed.
Same Direction
Hi fork+Lo fork
(mph) 65
(mph) G
Hi fork - Lo fork
l5
§ 2.6.1. ! § 5.6.1
Standard supply
Voltazc (V 13.6 V
Antenna I
Frey. j / �i
Antenna 2
i
GHz
Frey. GHz.
5 TRANSMISSION
Standard supply
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
FREQUENCY
Voltaee - 20% IV) 10.8 V
Fre . GHz J r
Freq. GHz
PAS
FAIL
STABILITY
Standard supply
Antenna I
Antenna 2
voltage + 20% (V) 16.3 V
Freq. GHz 3 V, %/
Freq. GHzN/A
6 § 2.6.5 / § 5.6.5
Mfg. Spec.
Antenna 1 ,
Antenna 2
PAS
FAIL.
POWER DENSITY
(maxmW/cm) :5 2
Power(mW/cm) u /
Power(mW/cm)
7 § 2.8 / § 5 8
Mfg. spec.
LVA activates
I LVA deactivates
LOW VOLTAGE
M <10.8
(V) (� /
I M f� L�
PAS
FAIL
8 § 2.9.1 / § 5.9.1
A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal .erYes ❑ No
DOPPLER AUDIO
B. Functionirr_ audio volume -adjustment control Yes ❑ No PAS.'
FAIL
§ 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4
Mfg. Spec.
Test results
9 INTERNAL
PASS
PAS
FAIL
CIRCUIT
§ 2.12.6.5 / §
A. Selects only targets moving towards radar a Yes ❑ No er-N.A. 10 5.12.6.5
B. Selects only targets moving away from radar ❑ Yes ❑ No WN.A.
PASS
FAIL
DIRECTIONAL
Stationary mode:
Low speed spec. 12
Lo speed disp.
Hi speed spec. 200
Hi speed disp.
target channel (mph)
§ 2.12.7 / § 2.12.8 /
5.12.7 / 5.12.8
Moving Mode
Low speed spec. 20
Lo speed disp. 7 0
11 LOW AND HIGH
target channel (mph)
PASS
FAIL.
SPEED DISPLAY
Ili speed spec. 200(C)
Hi speed disp.
TEST
Moving Mode:
Low speed spec. 15
Lo speed disp. f �"
patrol channel (mph)
Hi speed spec. 79
Hi speed disp. -7
12 §2.13/§5.13
F13
RFI TEST
I
PASS
FAIL
LABORATORY
COMMENTS
This radar device meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic F--
Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 OTASS ❑ FAIL
NHTSA/IACP
CERTIFICATION
Certified by: Date: _
15 INVENTORY ❑ Fork Cen ❑ Manual ❑ 24 Ant. o Remote ❑ Battery ❑ Cam-inc Case ❑ Other. (Please list
TRAFFIC R 4DAR CERTIFICATION
RHFInc.TESTED TO NHTSA SPECIFICATIONS / IACP CRITICAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NHTSA) National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration. (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police.
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified independent testing and repair facility.
Westminster, Calif. 92683
I
TEST ID
Date &ecciived
Certification Tlbbcr
Make
Model Stalker- I
Type (1-TV)
Directional radar
Same direction
2 DEVICE ID
Applied Concepts
Dual SL or DSR
IV
❑ Yes ego
9Yes ❑ No
Cotuirt unit_/N� , J
Antenna-1 SIN (�3'Ll� t�,! �?
Antenna-2 S/N
§ 2.4 / § 5A
Lows d ,f A S/N
Last date calib.
Freq. (Hz)
Sped (mph)
Mea�ur d (Hz
3 TUNING FORK
— . l3
?
PASS
FAIL
High speed fork S/N
Last date calib.
Freq. (I-Iz)
Speed (mph)
Measured (Iiz)
CALIBRATION
Lo fork
High fork
Fork speed (mph)
25 40
Stationary mode
Z 1-
G1 o
§ 2.5 / § 5.5
Disp. Speed (mph)
- -
4 RADAR DEVICE
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed.
TUNING FORK
PAS
FAIL
TESTS
Opposite Direction
(Hi fork-Lo fork)
(mph) 15
(mph) !
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed.-^
_
Same Direction
Ai fork + Lo fork
Hi fork - Lo fork 1
(mph) 65
15 (mph) }�
2.6.1. / 5.6.1
Standard supply
Voltage IV)
Antenna 1
Z
Antenna 2
§ §
13.6 V
Freu. GHz s
Freq. GHz
5 TRANSMISSION
Standard supply
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
FREQUENCY
Voltage -20% (V 10.8 V
Freq. GHz .'� �✓ i Z Z-
Free. Gib
PAS
FAIL,
STABILITY
Standard supply
_
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
voltage + 20% (V) 16.3 V
Freq. GHz 3 y, i Z-
Freq. . GHzN/A
6 § 2.6.5 / § 5.6.5
Mfg. Spec.
_`
Antenna 1
_
Antenna 2
-'r-
POWER DENSITY
(max mW/cm) 2
Power (mW/em)
Power (mW/cm)
PAS.
FFAIL:5
§ 2.8 / § 5 8
Mfg. spec.
LVA activates
LVA deactivates
�-
7 LOW VOLTAGE
(V) <10.8
(V)
(V)
(PASY
FAIL
8 § 2.9.1 / § 5.9.1
A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal -frYes ❑ No
DOPPLER AUDIO
B. Functioning audio volume -adjustment control "C Yes ❑ No (PAS
YASSs
FAIL
FAIL
9 § 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4
INTERNAL
Mfg. Spec.
PASS
Test results
S
�2�IS
CIRCUIT
��✓✓
§ 2.12.6.5 / §
A. Selects only targets moving towards radar ❑ Yes ❑ No .er-N.A. 10 5.12.6.5
B. Selects only targets moving away from radar ❑ Yes ❑ No 23d.A.
PASS
FAIL
DIRECTIONAL
Stationary mode:
Low speed spec. 12
Lo speed disp.
Hi speed spec. 200
Hi speed disp.
target channel (mph)
5.12.7 / 5.12.8
Moving Mode
Low speed spec. 20
Lo speed disp. 70
l l
LOW AND HIGH
target channel (mph)
i ASS) �
FAIL
SPEED DISPLAY
Hi speed spec. 200(C)
Hi speed disp. G�
��
TEST
Moving Mode:
Low speed spec. 15
Lo speed disp.
patrol channel (mph)
Hi speed spec. 79
Hi speed disp. ? ��
12 §2.13/§5.13
RFI TEST
ram-
i PAS.
FAIL
13 LABORATORY
-
COMMENTS
This radar device meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 O'PASS ❑ FAIL 14 NHTSA/IACP
CERTIFICATION
� r"
Certified by: -�_ Date:I A4-V1
_
15 INVENTORY ❑ Fork Cert ❑ Manual ❑ 21d Ant. ❑ Remote ❑ Battery ❑ Carrying Case ❑ Other: ;please list;
TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
RHFInc.TESTED TO NHTSA SPECIFICATIONS / IACP CRITICAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NHTSA) National highway and Traffic Safety Administration. (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police.
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified independent testing and repair facility.
Westminster, Calif. 92683
1 TEST ID
Date Received 7 U
Certificati i�u�ub
Make
Model S Iker- Type (1-IV)
Directional radar
Same direction
2 DEVICE ID
Applied Concepts
Dual Si. or DSR IV
❑ Yes ra'1<To
6Yes ❑ No
CO u711t
Antenna-1 S/N
Antenna-2 S/N
I
§ 2.4 / § 5.4
Low speedfork S/N
Last date calib.
Freq. (Hz)
Speed (mph)
Measured (Hz)
3 TUNING FORK
CALIBRATION
- PASS
FAIL
High speed fork S/N
-
Last date calib.
Freq. (Hz)
Speed (mph) I
Measured (Hz)
Lo fork
Hi eh fork --
Fork speed (mph)
25 40
Stationary mode
Disp. Speed (mph)
L+Dipplyed.
§ 2.5 / § 5.5
4 RADAR DEVICE
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
(mph) 15
TUNING FORK
PASS
FAII
TESTS
Opposite Direction
(Hi fork-Lo fork)
f'
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed. S
Same Direction
Hi fork + Lo fork
(mph) 65
(mph)
Hi fork - Lo fork
15 Standard supply
Antenna 1
I Antenna 2
§ 2.6.1. / § 5.6.1
Volime (V) 13.6 V
Fre. GHz % f y
Frec. GHz
5TRANSMISSION
Standard supply
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
FREQUENCY
Voltane - 20% (V t 10.8 V
t�
Frei . GHz / r �
Fre Q. GHz
PASS
FAI
STABILITY
Standard supply
Antenna I
Antenna 2
voli4ee +20% (V) 16.3 V
, y
Freq. GHz (%'
Freq. GHzN/A
6 § 2.6.5 / § 5.6.5
Mfg. Spec.
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
POWER DENSITY
(max mW/em) <_ 2
Power (mW/cm) j f
Power (mW/cm)
PASS
FAIT
7 § 2.8 / § 5.8
Mfg. spec.
I M 10 8
LVA activates
(V) "-�7
LVA deactivates
(V)
-�
PASS
FAIL
LOW VOLTAGE
�'
8 § 2.9.1 / § 5.9.1
A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal 'e Yes ❑ No
DOPPLER AUDIO
B. Functioning audio volume -adjustment control -Yes ❑ No pASS
FAIL
§ 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4
Mfg. Spec.
Test results
-�
9 INTERNAL
PASS
'�-s S
PASS
FAIL
CIRCUIT
/
§ 2.12.6.5 / §
A. Selects only targets moving towards radar ❑ Yes ❑ No iTN.A. 10 5.12.6.5
B. Selects only targets moving away from radar ❑ Yes ❑ No p-N.A.
PASS
FAIL
DIRECTIONAL
Stationary mode:
Low speed spec. 12
Lo speed disp. j 7
�--
Hi speed spec. 200
Hi speed disp.
`
target channel (mph)
-
§ 2.12.7 / § 2.12.8 / ,_.
-
5.12.7 / 5.12.8
Moving Mode
Low speed spec. 20
Lo speed disp. L v
-ti
11 LOW AND HIGH
target channel (mph)
PASS
FAIL
SPEED DISPLAY
Hi speed spec. 200(C)
Hi speed disp. ©�j
TEST
Moving Mode:
Low speed spec. 15
Lo speed disp. �, 5
Hi speed spec. 79
Hi speed disp. -7 c:)
patrol channel (mph)
12 § 2.13 / § 5.13
iPA$S
FAIL
RFI TEST
13 LABORATORY
COMMENTS
This radar device meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 J2 PASS ❑ FAIL 14 NIITSA/IACP
CERTIFICATION
Certified by: ' Date:
is INVENTORY ❑ Fork Cert ❑ Manual ❑ 2' Ant. ❑ Remote ❑ Battery ❑ Carrvine Case ❑ Other: i iilease list!
TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
TESTED TO NATSA SPECIFICATIONS / IACP CRITICAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS RHFinc.
Radar Repair (NHTSA) National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration. (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police.
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified independent testing and repair facility.
Westminster, Calif. 92683
1 TEST ID
Date Received _ `
Certification Nu fl ,byr.L
Make
Model StalCer- Type (14V)
Directional radar Same direction
2 DEVICE ID
Applied Conce its
Dual SL or DSR IV
❑ Yes gIN10 efYes ❑ No
Co in ur�itjS /
Antenna-1 SIN gT
Antenna-2 S/N
§ 2.4 / § 5.4
L w $yee 4 Last date calib.
Freq. (Hz)
Sped (r�ph)
Mea�ed�iIz�-
3 TUNING FORK
CALIBRATION
Seejd"fork
Sr
(S
FAIL
High!!s
SIN Last date calib.
p �
Fre .
q (Hz)
Speed (mph) i
I
d
Measured (Hz)
Lo fork
Hi-,h fork
Fork speed (mph)
25 40
Stationary mode
§ 2.5 / § 5.5
Disp. Speed (mph)
l�ri
4 RADAR DEVICE
TUNING FORK
PASS
FAIL
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed.
TESTS
Opposite Direction
(Hi fork-Lo fork)
(mph) 15
(mph)
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed.
Same Direction
Hi fork +Lo fork
(mph) 65
(mph)
'
Hi fork - Lo fork
15 Standard supply
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
§ 2.6.1. / § 5.6.1
Voltage (V) 13.6 V
Freq. GHz .�j 7
Fret. GHz
Standard supply
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
5 TRANSMISSION
FREQUENCY
Voltage - 20% ( V) 10.8 V
Freq. GHz /�jy
Fe . GHz
AS
FAIL
STABILITY
Standard supply
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
voltage + 20% (V) 163 V
Fre . GHz '7
Fre q. GHZN/A
6 § 2.6.51 § 5.6.5
Mfg. Spec.
Antenna 1
Antenna 2 --
-
POWER DENSITY
(max mW/cm) < 2
Power (mW/cm)
Power (mW/cm)
PASS
FAIL
§ 2.8 / § 5.8
Mfg. spec.
LVA activates
LVA deactivates
7 LOW VOLTAGE
(V)<10.8
(V) /
i
(V) 0
ASS
FAIL
8 § 2.9.1 / § 5.9.1
A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal .&-Yes ❑ No
DOPPLER AUDIO
B. Functioning audio volume -adjustment control PYes ❑ No PAS.
FAIL
§ 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4
Mfg. Spec.
Test results
_
9 INTERNAL
PASS!
s f
AS
FAIL
CIRCUIT
§ 2,12.6.5 / §
_
A. Selects only targets moving towards radar ❑ Yes ❑ No a-N.A. !0
5.12.6.5 B. Selects only targets moving away from radar ❑ Yes ❑ No 2,N.A.
PASS
FAIL
_
DIRECTIONAL
_
Stationary mode:
Low speed spec. 12
Lo speed disp. L
Hi speed spec. 200
Hi speed disp. -Z 60
target channel (mph)
§ 2.12.7 / § 2.12.8 /
- ----
5.12.7 / 5.12.8
Moving Mode
Low speed spec. 20
Lo speed disp.
I 1
LOW AND HIGH
target channel (mph)
PASS
FAIL
SPEED DISPLAY
Hi speed spec. 200(C)
Hi speed disp. G(/
TEST
Moving Mode: Low speed spec. 15 Lo speed disp.
patrol channel (mph) Hi speed spec. 79 Hi speed disp. 7 - - ------ - `PASS FAIL
12 § 2.13 / § S.I3
RFI TEST
13 LABORATORY
COMMENTS
This radar device meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 2rPASS ❑ FAIL 14 NHTSAMCP
CERTIFICATION
c-
Certified by: - Date: + -a ,
❑ Fork Cert o Manual ❑ 2nd Ant. ❑ Remote ❑ Battery
15 INVENTORY
_
13 Cam ing Case ❑ Other: (please list) j
TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
[(( RHFInc. TESTED TO NHTSA SPECIFICATIONS / IACP CRITICAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Radar Reps (NHTSA) National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration. (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police.
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified independent testing and repair facility.
Westminster Calill 92683
1 _ TEST ID
Date R � * cd3 _ Z Cl
Certification NumhL
Make
Model St ker-
Type (I -TV)
Directional radar
Same direction
2 DEVICE ID
Applied Concepts
Dual SL or DSR
IV
❑ Yes wNo I
❑ Yes diNo
Co}tR n 43� . IN
Antenna -I S/N ®�' Z �' lJ
Antenna-2 S/N
§ 2.4 / § 5.4
Low speed fork SIN
Last date calib.
Freq. (Hz) Speed (mph)
Measured (Hz)
3 TUNING FORK
CALIBRATION
PASS
FAIL
- h sp d, SQ�T
Last date calib.
Freq. (Hz) Speed
Measured (1 fi) ,7
'
Lo fork
Hi gli fork
Fork speed (mph)
25 40
Stationary mode
§ 2.5 / § 5.5
Disp. Speed (mph)
y i-�
ZJ
4 RADAR DEVICE
TUNING FORK
PAS
FAIT,
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed.
TESTS
Opposite Direction
(Hi fork — Lo fork)
(mph) 15
(mph)
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed.
Same Direction
Hi fork + Lo fork
(mph) 65
(mph)
Hi fork - Lo fork
15 5
2.6.1. / 5.6.1
Standard supply
Voltage.fi
(�) 13.6 V
_
Antenna 1 ,,
Freq. GHz r /
Antenna 2
Freq. GHz
-
5 § §
TRANSMISSION
Standard supply
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
FREQUENCY
Voltage — 20% V) 10.8 V
Fre • . GHz . ` 1 / /
Freq. GIIz
PASS
FAIL
STABILITY
Standard supply
Antenna I
Antenna 2
voles c + 20% (V 163 V
Freq. GHz !:
Fre GHzN/A
6 I § 2.6.5 / § 5.6.5
Mfg. Spec.
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
POWER DENSITY
(max mW/cm) < 2
Power (mW/em)
Power mW/em
( )
PAS
`„�
FAIL
$ 2.8 / § 5 8
Mfg. spec.
LVA activates
LVA deactivates
7 LOW VOLTAGE
M <_ 10.8
(V) 7 6,
') � 3
PAS
FAIL
8 § 2.9.1 / § 5.9.1
I A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal 46 Yes ❑ No 1 PAS •
FAIL
DOPPLER AUDIO
B. Functioning audio volume -adjustment control . Yes ❑ No § 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4
Mfg. Spec.
Test results
9 INTERNAL
PASS
L��S S-
PASS
FAIL
CIRCUIT
§ 2.12.6.5 / §
A. Selects only targets moving towards radar ❑ Yes ❑ No WN.A. 10 5.12.6.5
B. Selects only targets moving away from radar ❑ Yes ❑ No r�N•A.
PASS
FAIL
DIRECTIONAL
Stationary mode:
Low speed spec. 12
Lo speed disp. ;!
Hi speed spec. 200
Hi speed disp. ty
target channel (mph)
5.12.7 / 5.12.8
Moving Mode
Low speed spec. 20
Lo speed disp. 17
11 LOW AND HIGH
target channel (mph)
PASS
FAIL
SPEED DISPLAY
Iii s ed spec. 200
speed sp (C)
Ili speed disp. 0%
TEST
Moving Mode:
Low speed spec. 15
Lo speed disp.
Hi speed spec. 79
Hi speed disp.
patrol channel (mph)
12 § 2.13 / § 5.13
PAS 5
FAIL
RFI TEST
13 LABORATORY
_
COMMENTS
This radar device meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 J3' PASS ❑ FAIL 14 NHTSA/IACP
CERTIFICATION
c
Certified by: Date: gq
/u�W" _ 3 _, 24/
1 S
INVENTORY
❑ Fork Cert ❑ Manual ❑ 2ad Ant. ❑ Remote ❑ Battery
❑ CartNineCase ❑ Other: (please list�
TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
RHFInc. TESTED TO NHTSA SPECIFICATIONS / IACP CRITICAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NHTSA) National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration. (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police.
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified independent testing and repair facility.
Westminster, Calif. 92683
F 1
TEST ID
Date Received
-3 -?p
Certification umber
-1-1Z
Make
Model Stal •er-
fype (1-IV)
Directional radar Same
direction
2 DEVICE ID
Applied Conceits
Dual SL or DSR
IV
❑ Yes X\,bl
Z Yes ❑ No
Co m unit S/ Z 0-7
Antenna -I S/N 030 -7 3
Antenna-2 SIN
§ 2.4 / § 5.4
Low speed fork SIN
Last date calib.
Freq. (Hz)
Speed (mph)
Measured (Hz)
3 TUNING FORK
CALIBRATION
--
High speed oZS
PASQ
FAIL,
Last date calib.
Freq. (Hz)
Spy (mph)
Me 'L
'7z }/
CJ [�
S"
3 _
Lo fork
Hi fork
Fork speed (mph)
25 40
Disp. Speed (mph)
Z I—
el 0
§ 2.5 / § 5.5
Stationary mode
4 RADAR DEVICE
TUNING FORK
PAS
FAIL
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed.
TESTS
Opposite Direction
(Hi fork - Lo fork)
(mph) 15
(mph)
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed.
Same Direction
Hi fork + Lo fork
(mph) 65
(mph) b
Hi fork - Lo fork
15 § 2.6.1. / § 5.6.1
Standard supply
Vol taee (V) 13.6 V
Antenna 1
Freq. GHz y, i i d
Antenna 2 �>
Freq. GHz 3 T • 7/7
5 TRANSMISSION
PASS
FAIL
Standard supply
_
Antenna 1
9 Antenna 2
3 FREQUENCY
Volta=e-20%(V) 10.8V
Freq. Gib
Freq. GHz 7/7
Standard supply
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
STABILITY
voltage + 20% tV) 163 V
Fre, . GHz 3 y % /
Freq. GHzN/A 3 /- / 7
6 § 2.6.5 / § 5.6.5
Mfg. Spec.
Antenna I
Q
Antenna 2
9 PASS
FAIL
POWER DENSITY
(max mW/cm) 5 2
Power (mW/cm)
Power (mW/cm)
§ 2 8 / § 5 8
Mfg. spec.
LVA activates
LVA deactivates
7 LOW VOLTAGE
(V) <_ 10.8
M 7,
(V) �y , -
PASS
FAIL
8 § 2.9.1 / § 5.9.1
A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal wYes ❑ No PASS
FAIL
DOPPLER AUDIO
B. Functionine audio volume -adjustment control wYes ❑ No § 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4
Mfg. Spec.
Test results
9 INTERNAL
PASS
104 f
PASS
FAIL
CIRCUIT
-r
§ 2.12.6.5 / §
A. Selects only targets moving towards radar ❑ Yes ❑ No P.N.A. 10 5.12.6.5
B. Selects only targets moving away from radar ❑ Yes ❑ No wN.A.
PASS
FAIL
DIRECTIONAL I
Stationary mode:
Low speed spec. 12
Lo speed disp. / 'L
Hi speed spec. 200
Hi speed disp. Z 47U
target channel (mph)
5.12.7 / 5.12.8
Moving Mode
Low speed spec. 20
Lo speed disp. 0
Z
11 LOW AND HIGH
SPEED DISPLAY
target channel (mph)
PAS
FAIL
Hi speed spec. 200(C)
--
Hi speed disp. 2 d v
TEST
Moving Mode:
Low speed spec. 15
Lo speed disp. t !r-
Hi speed spec. 79
patrol channel (mph)
Hi speed disp. -7
12 § 2.13 / § 5.13 I
--
PAS,
FAIL
RFI TEST J
13 LABORATORY
COMMENTS
This radar device meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 ZPASS ❑ FAIL 14 NHTSA/IACP
CERTIFICATION
Certified by: Date:
15 INVENTORY
❑ Fork Cert ❑ Manual ❑ 2nd Ant. ❑ Remote El Battery
_
❑ Carn•ine Case ❑ Other: Iplease list)
TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
RHFinc. TESTED TO NHTSA SPECIFICATIONS / IACP CRITICAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NHTSA) National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration. (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police.
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified independent testing and repair facility.
Westminster, Calif. 92683
1 TEST ID
Date Received �Li
Certification lu
Make
Model alker-
Type (I -IV)
Directional radar
Same direction
2 DEVICE ID
Applied Concepts
Dual SL or DSR
111
❑ Yes eNo
d`iCes ❑ No
C tinguail SIN
Antenna-1 S/N `, . ' G -
Antenna 2 SIN
-yl:� -?6
Measured (Hz)
§ 2.4 / § 5.4
I Low speed fork SIN
Last date calib.
Freq. (Hz)
Speed (mph)
3 TUNING FORK
CALIBRATION
PASS FAIL.
MejWd Hz)
3 Hi s eed f
u
Last date calib. '
Freq. .
q (Hz)
Speed (m h)
Lo fork
Hi gh fork
Fork speed (mph)
25 -
40 Stationary mode
Disp. Speed (mph)
? j"
'140
§ 2.5 / § 5.5
----
4 RADAR DEVICE
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed.
TUNING FORK
PAS
FALL
TESTS
Opposite Direction
(Hi fork—Lo fork)
(mph) 15
(mph) i
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed. G <
Same Direction
Hi fork + Lo fork
(mph) 65
(-ph)
Hi fork - Lo fork
15 § 2.6.1. / § 5.6.1
Standard supply
Volta •e i V i 13.6 V
Antenna 1
Freq. GHz
Antenna 2 !! JJ
Freq. GHz 3
5 TRANSMISSION
Standard supply
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
FREQUENCY
Vol t. ue — 20% ( V t 10.8 V
Fre . GHz 3 y�9 e ` .3
Freq. GHz ! 7 //
PASS
FA II.
STABILITY
Standard supply
Antenna 1
`/, ''
Antcnna2
voltage + 20% (V) 163 V
Frei . GHz �°.3
Freq. GHzN/A .�
6 § 2.6.5 / § 5.6.5
Mfg. Spec,
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
DENSITY
(max mW/cm) 2
:5POWER
Power (mW/cm)
Power (mW/cm) sL
p
FAIL
§ 2.8 / § 5 8
Mfg. spec.
LVA activates
LVA deactivates
7 LOW VOLTAGE
M _< 10.8
(V) -7-7
7j7
M �` �
PAS
FAIL
8 § 2.9.1 / § 5.9.1
A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal .r9'Yes ❑ No (PAS.
DOPPLER AUDIO
B. Functioning audio volume -adjustment control A Yes ❑ No FAIL
§ 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4
Mfg. Spec.
Test results
9 INTERNAL
PASS
S
PAS
FAIL
CIRCUIT
§ 2.12.6.5 / §
A. Selects only targets moving towards radar ❑ Yes ❑ No efN.A. 10 5.12.6.5
B. Selects only targets moving away from radar o Yes ❑ No rrN.A.
PASS
FAIL
DIRECTIONAL
Stationary mode:
Low speed spec. 12
Lo speed disp.
Hi speed spec. 200
Hi speed disp. 0§2.12.7/§2.12.8/
target channel (mph)
5.12.7 / 5.12.8
Moving Mode
Low speed spec. 20
Lo speed disp. Q
11 LOW AND HIGH
target channel (mph)
PASS
FAIL
SPEED DISPLAY
Ili speed spec. 200(C)
Hi speed disp. 7 d
TEST
--
Moving Mode:
Low speed spec. 15
Lo speed disp. —'
patrol channel (mph)
Hi speed spec. 79
Hi speed disp. -7
1 12
§ 2.13 / § 5.13
I PASS
RFI TEST
PAIL
13 LABORATORY
COMMENTS
This radar device meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 ZPASS ❑ FAIL 14 NHTSA/IACP
CERTIFICATION
A
Certified by:�
AA41y
p Date: — —
15 INVENTORY a Fork Cert ❑ Manual ❑ 21d Ant. o Remote o Battery ❑ Cam. ing Case ❑ Other: ( please list)
TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
RHFinc TESTED TO NHTSA SPECIFICATIONS / LACP CRITICAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NHTSA) National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration. (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police.
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified independent testing and repair facility.
Westminster, Calif. 92683
1 TEST ID
Date Received
9-
Certificati , urn urn
�,
Make
Model Stalker-
Type (1-IV)
Directional radar
Same direction
2 DEVICE 1D
Applied Concepts
Dual SL or DSR
IV
❑ Yes ,e1No
e'Yes ❑ No
Cor, g 7}n}t GSM � . 7
Antenna -I S/N v elt' -7
Antenna-2 S/N Q j Ca c� '
r=—
§ 2.4 / § 5.4
Low speed fork S/N
Last date calib.
Freq. (Hz) Speed (mph)
Measured (Hz)
3 TUNING FORK
CALIBRATION
PASS
FAIL
High speed f ,$�/lsj ,
Last date calib.
Freq. (IIz) Spy 1 I n )
Measured (H4
Lo fork
High fork
Fork speed (mph)
25 40
Stationary mode
Disp. Speed (mph)
§ 2.5 / § 5.5
4 RADAR DEVICE
TUNING FORK
;PASS
FAIL.
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed.
TESTS
Opposite Direction
(Hi fork — Lo fork)
(mph) 15
(mph) ` S-
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed.
Same Direction
Hi fork + Lo fork
(mph) 65
(mph)
Hi fork - Lo fork
15 r
I
Standard supply
Antenna I
Antenna 2
§ 2.6.1. / § 5.6.1
Voltage (V) 13.6 V
Fre. GHz 3 y - .3 3
Fr. . GHz 3 ? / -7
5 TRANSMISSION
FREQUENCY
PASS
PAIL
Standard supply
Voltaee— 20% (. V 1 10.8 V
Antenna 1 >
Fre . G1iz J , / 32
Antenna 2
Fre . GHz ,:j , -' / �7
STABILITY
Standard supply
vol race + 20% (V 16.3 V
Antenna 1 _
Fre . GHz 3 `1: 2 33
Antenna 2
Fre . GHzN/A �� 76%
6 § 2.6.5 / § 5.6.5
POWER DENSITY
Mfg. Spec.
(max mW/cm) <_ 2
Antenna 1
Power (mW/cm) a
Antenna 2
Power (mW/cm) f
'PAS.'
FAIL
§ 2.8 / § 5 8
Mfg. spec.
I LVA activates
LVA deactivates
7 LOW VOLTAGE
(V) 510.8
(V) .7
i
(V)
Q��
c'3
PAS
FAIL
8 § 2.9.1 / § 5.9.1
A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal .0-Yes a No
DOPPLER AUDIO
B. Functioning audio volume -adjustment control arYes ❑ No ( PAS.V
FAIL
§ 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4
Mfg. Spec. Test results
9 INTERNAL
PASS '024 SJ
PASS
FAIL
CIRCUIT
§ 2.12.6.5 / §
A. Selects only targets moving towards radar ❑ Yes ❑ No z N.A. 10 5.12.6.5
B. Selects only targets moving away from radar ❑ Yes o No rrN.A.
PASS
FAIL
DIRECTIONAL
Stationary mode:
Low speed spec. 12
Lo speed disp. ✓ .Z—
Hi speed spec. 200
Hi speed disp.
target channel (mph)
§2.12.7/§2.12,8/
5.12.7 / 5.12.8
Moving Mode
Low speed spec. 20
Lo speed disp.
11 LOW AND HIGH
target channel (mph)
PASS
FAIL
SPEED DISPLAY
Hi speed spec. 200(C)
Hi speed disp.
TEST
Moving Mode:
Low speed spec. 15
Lo speed disp. !� �--
patrol channel (mph)
Hi speed spec. 79
Hi speed disp. ? c�
12 § 2.13 / § 5.13
RFI TEST
PASS
FAIL
13 LABORATORY
COMMENTS
This radar device meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 2TAss ❑ FAIL 14 NfTTSA/IACP
,
CERTIFICATION
Certified by: .-- Date: r 7
15 INVENTORY
❑ Fork Cert ❑ Manual ❑ 2' Ant. ❑ Remote ❑ Battery
❑ Currying Case ❑ Other: i please list (
RHFInc. TESTED TO NHTSA SPECIFICATIONS / LkCP CRITICAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Radar Repair (NHTSA) National highway and Traffic Safety Administration. (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police.
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified independent testing and repair facility.
Westminster, Calif. 92683
1 TEST ID Date Received Certificayi�ipbc
Make
Model Stalker-
Type (I -IV)
Directional radar Same direction
2 DEVICE ID
Applied Concepts
Dual SL or DSR
IV
❑ Yes ,wNo I W-yes ❑ No
Co it 6 /
Antenna-1 S/N ©(� y g 9
Antenna-2 S/N d Z -7 64/ —
§ 2.4 / § 5.4
Low speed fork S/N
Last date calib.
Freq. (Hz)
Speed (mph)
Measured (Hz)
3 TUNING FORK
CALIBRATION
PASS
FAIL
Hi 1h speed fork S/N
I Last date calib.
Freq. (Hz)
Speed
-
Measured (Hz)/
Z
l 8' 8
ees—
Lo fork
M ph fork
Fork speed (mph)
25 40
Stationary mode
§ 2.5 / § 5.5
Disp. Speed (mph)
4 RADAR DE V10E
TUNING FORK
PASS
FAIL
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected,
Displayed.
TESTS
Opposite Direction
(Hi fork — Lo fork)
(mph) 15
(mph) 1 �^
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed. /
Same Direction
Hi fork +Lo fork
(mph) 65
(mph) 4t
Hi fork - Lo fork
15 1 r
Standard supply
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
§ 2.6.1. / § 5.6.1
Voltage (V 1 13.6 V
Freq. GHz 3 7 Z % �Freq.
GHz 7 Z
5 TRANSMISSION
Standard supply
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
FREQUENCY
Voluree — 20% 1 V) 10.8 V
Freq. GHz ,3 `f,7 Z>
Freq. GHz Z I/
PASS
FAIL
STABILITY
Standard supply
Antenna I
Antenna 2
voltage + 20% (V) 16.3V
Freq. GHz 3 , Z I
`�
Frec.GHzN/A c. -2 2'
6 § 2.6.5 / § 5.6.5
POWER DENSITY
Mfg. Spec.
(max mW/cm) c 2
Antenna 1
Power (mW/cm) .17
Antenna 2
Power (mW/cm) 9
PAS
FAIL
7 § 2.8 / § 5 8
Mfg, spec.
(V)_510.8
LVA activates
(V)
LVA deactivates
(V)Q
PAS
FAIL
LOW VOLTAGE
7r 7
8 § 2.9.1 / § 5.9.1
A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal :a -Yes ❑ No
DOPPLER AUDIO
B. Functioning audio volume -adjustment control rrYes ❑ No PASS
FAIL
§ 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4
Mfg. Spec.
Test results
9 INTERNAL
PASS
�,4 t S
PASS
FAIL
CIRCUIT
§ 2.12.6.5 / §
A. Selects only targets moving towards radar ❑ Yes ❑ No rrN.A. 10 5.12.6.5
B. Selects only targets moving away from radar ❑ Yes ❑ No wN.A.
PASS
FAIL
_ DIRECTIONAL
Stationary mode:
Low speed spec. 12
Lo speed disp. / Z
Hi speed spec. 200
Hi speed disp. Zoe)
U
target channel (mph)
§ 2.12.7 ! § 2.12.8 !
i
5.12.7 / 5.12.8
Moving Mode
Low speed spec. 20
Lo speed disp. d
I 1
LOW AND HIGH
SPEED DISPLAY
target channel (mph)
PAS
FAIL
Hi speed spec. 200(C)
Hi speed disp. DU
TEST
— -
Moving Mode:
Low speed spec. 15
Lo speed disp. �--
patrol channel (mph)
Hi speed spec. 79
Hi speed disp. -7 g
12 § 2.13 / § 5.13
RFI TEST
PASS
FAIL
13 LABORATORY
COMMENTS
This radar device rneets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 $'PASS ❑ FAIL 14 NHTSA/IACP
CERTIFICATION
Certified by: Date:
INVENTORY ❑ Fork Cert ❑ Manual ❑ 2ndAnt. ❑ Remote ❑ Battery 'Is
❑ Cara imp,, Case ❑ Other: ( please list i
TRAFFIC RADAR CERTIFICATION
RHFInc. TESTED TO NHTSA SPECIFICATIONS / IACP CRITICAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Radar Repair (NHTSA) National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration. (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police.
16202 Keats Circle R.H.F. is a certified independent testing and repair facility.
Westminster, Calif. 92683
I
TEST ID
Date Received
-3-70
Certificati u� .
Make
Model Stalker- Type (14V)
Directional radar
Same direction
2 DEVICE ID
A )lied Conce is
Dual SL or DSR 1V
❑ Yes ENo
Wyes ❑ No
Co tin Q
Antenna-1 S/N Z 6 Z �jl 'Z
Antenna-2 SIN el Z
§ 2.4 / § 5.4
Low speed fork SIN Last date calib.
Freq_ (Hz)
Speed (mph)
Measured (Hi)
3 FORK
TUNCALIBRATION
CALIBRATION
PASS
FAIL,
Hi speed fork S/N i Last date c dib.
Freq. (Hz)
Speed (mph)
Mevured (Hz
Lo fork
I Hi eh fork
Fork speed (mph)
25 I 40
Stationary mode
§ 2.5 / § 5.5
Disp. Speed (mph)
2 g-
�Q
4 RADAR DEVICE
TUNING FORK
PASS
FAIL
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed.
TESTS
Opposite Direction
(Hi fork-Lo fork)
(mph) 15
(mph)
Moving mode
TARGET SPEED
Expected.
Displayed.
_I
Same Direction
Hi fork + Lo fork
Hi fork - Lo fork
(mph) 65
15 (mph)
I
2.6.1. / 5.6.1
Standard supply
Voltage (%' 1 13.6 V
Antenna 1
Fre.. GHz 9 V, .0 z o
Antenna 2
Freq. GHz /
5 § §
TRANSMISSION
FREQUENCY
PASS
FAIL
Standard supply
Voitaae - 20% (V) 10.8 V
Antenna 1
Frei . GHz 3 . �` z D
Antenna 2
Freq. GHz X 761
STABILITY
Standard supply
Antenna 1
Antenna
voltage + 20% (V) 16.3 V
Freq. GHz �/ Z G
Frec . GHzN/A X , b/
6 § 2.6.5 / § 5.6.5
Mfg. Spec.
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
�
PASS
FAIL
POWER DENSITY
(max mW/cm) 152
Power (mW/cm)
Power (mW/cm) ,
§ 2.8 / § 5 8
Mfg. spec.
LVA activates
LVA deactivates
7 LOW VOLTAGE
M S 10.8
M
(V) l r-
PASS
FAIL
8 § 2.9.1 / § 5.9.1
A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal ,ayes ❑ No
DOPPLER AUDIO
B. Funetionimo audio volume -adjustment control pYes ❑ No pASS
FAIL.
§ 2.12.4 / § 5.12.4
Mfg. Spec.
Test results
_
9 INTERNAL
PASS
IP4S I
PASS
FAIL
CIRCUIT
§-2.12.6.5 / §
A- Selects only targets moving towards radar ❑ Yes ❑ No e'N.A. 10 5.12.6.5
B. Selects only targets moving away from radar ❑ Yes ❑ No n-N.A.
PASS
FAIL
DIRECTIONAL
_
Stationary mode:
Low speed spec. 12 T
Lo speed disp. f Z
Hi speed spec. 200
Hi speed disp.
target channel (mph)
§ 2.12.7 ! § 2.12.8 !
5.12.7 / 5.12.8
Moving Mode
Low speed spec. 20
Lo speed disp. 2 G
11 LOW AND HIGH
target channel (mph)
(PAS
FAIL
—
SPEED DISPLAY
Hi speed spec. 200(C)
Hi speed disp. Z�G
TEST
—
Moving Mode:
Low speed spec. 15
Lo speed disp. ��-
Hi speed spec. 79
Hi speed disp.
� 9
patrol channel (mph)
12 §2.13/§5.13
RFI TEST
PASS
FAIL
13 LABORATORY
COMMENTS
_
This radar device meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration. California Vehicle Code Section 40802 )2-PASS 13 FAIL 14 NHTSA/IACP
`�INVENTORY
CERTIFICATION
A
CerdSed by: Date: 9- 3 ' 0
15 ❑ Fork Cert ❑ Manual ❑ 2'a Ant. ❑ Remote ❑ Battery
_ ❑ Carr, ing Case ❑ Other: (please list)
This Is To Certify That
Has successfully completed the 32 hour
F .o.S.T. certified. Radar operator Course,
conducted by the Los Angeles Police Department
July 26 through July 29, 2011,
in the City of Los Anueles
R.AiV�DIE NIAR'CIiYEZ, Officer (%-
Department Radar, Laser Coordinator
EA_N KARMODY, Sen4eant
Officer in Cnarae. Traffic Coordination Section
Decatur Electronics, Inc. Decatur, IL
of
ABE 1'. CAMPOS
(Name and Title)
COUNTS UiNLIMITEI)
(Department)
has successfully comdeted a trainrrn ce,wse in the operational aspects of Decatur Genesis RADAR
S/ 14/9t:
iraum:y i;epresentative
Date 7ecatur Electronics • Decatur, Illinois
Decatur Electronics, Inc. Decatur, IL
ABE CAIPOS
(Name and Title)
of _ - __._COUNTS UNLIMITED
(Department)
has successfully comoleted a training course in the operational aspects of Decatur Genesis RADAR
9/14/99
Iraining Representative
Date Decatur Electronics • Decatur, Illinois
C- W
0 i.r O r
i� -a Lo r N
V O O
4— 0O O O
O O CO
U 0
r cY) v' m
N CID 2- N
�, fn
Q 06 m I U
�< Lj O w
L L c 2 Q O C C
v Ocu c C
M (6
V c� C1
LO
Q 0 0t�-u�Xrn
O O0 N Q) N OOLL ,
_ c+ U Q to d O 1
O
L
^ TT
co
CL Co Co C:
0 COQom = O N CO M t p O
Qi o r
m .,. O c i -�? D u o
W
ca
0 E
6`
W
0 cn
NQ
U
p
W
770
CL
U
O
U
O
Q
70 N
O
C
q�
Q
(U
I. -
O
a)
—0
LIJ
0 �CO
c
o
a
4-A
Q
�c
L.,
o
L
Aj
0 N
ca
0 0
CL
n.
M
L
O T
t L T
N
O p T
� rnN
T
o
o rn c
C
co 7O CO
C\l —m I
N
U
L
i O 4-
O
UN O
'r
j
C'� L cuQ� �
..k
L U T cn
•M O ~ -a )) �
0 cO
p:
d to d
Q Q%
Ted
°�LUEoro�
tv O M U-
Q,
m
r
Uo2S_��¢ I ch O
U c�L�c
U
y � Cl) � �
Q. C: ti
� C6
Q-a)tun
pO
N
Q.wCU
} 0 U U
J -Fa U) cn
O N O U O
w co
uj
Q
U
C 73
V
00 > 0
0 -0 C
N
c� a/
-a 0
70 LL
3 W
a.
0 Q � N
-~ a
L. a
L
0 :1-j
m
U
U
L
0 m
L
Q
0 -a
ct
U)
0 CL
m
-L
O
i�
U
N
x
a)
L
U)
-#.-a
0 E
cn
L
rO
V
rn
O
LC) �"
N
�r o rn
a
o cu
tom -Co
°6
r m 1
U
L
a? j
cD
>M
co
`r
N
° o j
c
s o U) c i
C�
0a�
❑
O
O N- E O r
N 0Z5 o� LL
rn
CO cU o
►
a < ► co O
U
0 otS 0)
UO�
C
r_ CL r r
O
Q. 2 J N N Co (aq
) C E U
O
0 ♦
(� O M 0
cts o m N o Q Un
0 J- �--
r,U ° o
L�
vl- 00 �0 T-c
m�
(D—j S'I—a_Wa_-1
Lo
L
co
0 fir.
O
.J
o
L�J
L
O O
U c
>+ O
Z3 tQ
N �
Q
O
Q N
a)
a
.cu
-a
L
O
LL
0 H
a
W
a
O
O
U
CU
L
O
Q.
O
cc
U)
O
(19
.L
C)
N
X
a)
L-
O
U)
a)
aD
E
a�
L
O
LJ
(A
O T
t LO '
N
0 0�—
p N
r
O <C
co
rn U
O
N
00 C
O
N p
in
U
, O O O
f" A CO
q�
06 co
I
N
U
L o
meµ-
N
U
N O ti
,r
U
cu
O- T
\
O N
UN cn'�'^^
C
O
LO
CO
0 �O
O O� x0)
T
N
() O M LL
p ccs
YU� o
I
U o2i
C: S o i chi U
c
L U O .*..
cm
� O C
cn
'Q
r �
cII M C d
N
O
Q
2= N (U
O O
;\
N—.5
Da UNp.�
Ur
m
� cl!aoS06
U)U
a co —2000o0owco
c��E°-a0.3:1=-0-wa `-i
es��
Q
LU
W
Q
0 o
-
'''�
to
a
a
N
.CU o
.�
v
-�
C: ca
W
cn
4-.
a
0 LL-
_0
U
4-
U
L
0 4-1
CL
0 cu
L.L..
U)
0 CL
0 i�
U
N
X
L-
U)
E
CD
0 WA
O r-
.0 LO r
N
o o
d o N
�-
r-- O
0)w
O
00 rn U
O
o O o
U
C)
N
M c
Mo.0
p
0 iC7
U
N O N C
N (6
N
>, N
d
o
Q7
p
U
> 1`
L
�+
U
�
�.�
�Q� C
a-o�0
C
�
O
~ M
0 ro L-
cc)
0 a o
(D
a LO
O Q X O
V-
iy N
E O
n v o m U- ,
p
_ 4- U
d~' q. O
I
0 SQL
UO+-
C
�8-2-10
Q-N�O r--
tm
ro�oo
0 cow
o-0 �No �Lo=o
m o so Sow
,
cu
O
C/) W U
p
��
w;
�P a. w 5-
-j CS
V"J
0 CL
C.
El
O
4-0 o r
C ISM r' N
V O r r
O N r
r r- O O
O O Q �
U � o
ti o O o
i.
W -� N Q C
ip h CV cc
C N 06 L m U
. o �= CO
O L- � Ri cn 0 c C C
N t6 ca �� D a C
U _ UN � .c c
co 0
O p ♦ 1 RS o�co co
LV ��,.
ccao�0-
�
OO LL ~ m OawT
U o ❑ N� °oOcur-
Cr) L
C O C 4 M cU� o I
Q J rn� Q d 0
U0S C C U cO
o Lr U I m r C
s.
N N yCD CL �Qa) 6 C: I >'
O 0 � �Q�tu `0)�(��oo
N W ,\ ca'a o � N m co
5 a) � O CA�o s 6
�V a ��
o_�� N o 0 o uoi co
N fi V
-> Q XLL
CO
U
Cl)a
U O
�o
ca :; 7,-
cu
N N
c6 C.
-a O
O �
CU
Q �
Cl)
i
W
U
O
Q
w
a
O
a
0 a
O
:1-j
m
U
N
U
L
O
co
Q
0 cc
L.L.
0 0—
cu
O
ai
U
Qi
X
L
a)
E
L
0 Al
cn
0 u-) r N
ti o
o rn 4 0°
0 0Y U 0
CY)0 0 o U
ce) c v'
" o Tl- oo
N O O O
WE N ccu C
06 0)
(lI
N 2!, m U) a)
cuQrn6- c
`° �� 0-00ar-a0i
~ � �co 0
o
cn 2U� o
U0 06 c 0 I MUD ci
LCL a) C-) C)
�cu ca�o i��co
m 0-0 No Qm �.-
v c00C 0)
Q ,
O —� U)� N O v 0 vOi M
C7�MLua.-j
T3
N
Q
C.
El
C� W
Q
U 0
2) a
U U
o �0
CU
-0 c
N (D a
,C) 0
�C W
N 0
0 cn
a) w
.c
LL
0 U-
0 U
U
L
0 Q.
0 CL
to
CL
U
X
N
L
-I-+
E
w
cn
L
0 ILW
L
o �-
�
o rn Q
00 CD U
O
rn
a 0 o
U
rco
N
m C O
ca
Q r p C
(13
i O N O
az5
co
d
0 q�f j p >ti�
�.
a)
co
M
co m
o o�
oL a.
I°�CL
00 U-
co
N � �
Q c 4- o
I
U I `�U 0
�
atS ��¢
U ML�c
- U O +-• O
C'Q2-
O
i- E U
E)O
c�� o-0 �No QLo
�d
�J57
�}--�0 - a)LCCO
wci—+�co
�1
UJ
Q
-o p
E �cu F
O
. i -0 : W
m a
Q cn
N w
4-0
a
O
LL
C-
O
-1-i
m
U
O
L
O
cc
Q
O
L
U)
.�
L
O
(6
U
a
U
x
L
O
E
cn
L
0 Q�
=
Cl)
O 0
i
.i
U
c
ca
N N
o
s
70cu
v
c
v
LO
UL-
0 -1-4
U
U
L
0 cu
Q.
0 L
cu
-a
co
v,
0 CL
to
.i
O
U
v
X
N
O
(U
E
O
cn
L
a
W
O r
0 0 cq
ti cv
m o
CD rn Q °°
O w U o
o 0 0
�- ce) a'
N 0 � p C E
N O N
Lo � h N m r_
06 N Z3 I
m CO
O
r U
i O ,�a-. �
> O U)
co i ( TQ O r
L CIO+�' fa C
Rf O p �- N C
4i L V:- ��� O
.: 0 M 5
o N O Q'
QO�+. Ind (/)
0 fi 0 Or-
°�-Eacar�
N 0 o rn u- co
J- v "Zr o o
Ua'S a 0 I cMUT c
�'QS-- UO
v� c Q. � c rn
'.
roQ2`a)a)(o aoo
Cc!c8EoU 0
;�
;\ co 0-0 0No 15L Lo vT
o�����V ai 0 ai Lccoo
0O N O U O W CO
a. W CL-i
.a
0 0
a.
Q
2 L.f.. UU
Q
U
L. a.
0 0
\0
/� 0 O
cc F
N N
-a 0
-o w
C: M a
_CY 0
C
0 V
U
L
0 cu
Q
0 cu
co
0. 0
L
cV
O
U
W
X
N
cn
11-J
a)
E
w
L
0 A,
J
L
O r-
tt� r'
N
O OCN
O
O
O O Q
00 U
O
Q
0 U
N
O Tp'C F)
�
N
LO
ti ` a?
N Cn
a)
r-
�� N°,>o�
Q
(CSO
cu 0) C
o
C
v L U � CO
O
c
a)
� F- M tb .- 5
co W-a�Q�
C'1
z Q caw x CV)
L L -2 Clm ti
CN
r
O
^O' C
Q(as;U4
Q i CD(nQIcouc
1 U06 c—U M
ci
\
�.Ccac
•�
\.
C L C c V
V
Q O
mM 00
�O
mo-cNL
L
U`�O o
a) rn
a) o
�-C
�
a.w0-AC,
24 L.LLLJ
Q
v
o
U
O
>,
-a
o
m
0 1�
CN
(D
O
tea/
L.i.
0 CU
uj
0 _C
O
>+
a
L
a
U
C �
O o
:� o r-
(� LO
O O
.� O O d O
UL
Oa)O o
c7 Np T
C\l0�O O 0
00 © O
(a C) N >
L to L ca C
N 06 cQL
�m U
o � Z O � ~ � I
U O N ti +►
CD
Co. tB Q O O
m ro � O
cc O i— M cu
co m co -0 ce) O
fa N O U i act) N
O rp 0 X 07
� o p - f� CprO
��,
Lo
CL o-js�� �op�
1 U ca r r
L C ch r =
O Ca
~
y,_ c Q ZE = N O c0 (4 'd O O
` �oM NoQu�O
a� lA���Q o CO
'It
q J t13 (� V7 c U= m
O
N �.C�JI-O �f-0-Wa.J
U
X
O
E
Q
O
CU
ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION NO.2024-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA
ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN STREETS AND
SEGMENTS OF CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA
WHEREAS, an Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits is required to establish speed limits on certain City streets and where speed enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic speed measuring device; and
WHEREAS, an Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits was performed in December of 2023, in accordance with the requirements of the State of California; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
That the City Council of the City of Yucaipa adopt and establish the speed limits based on the Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits dated December 2023 (Finalized January 2024) to allow for enforcement of these speed limits using radar or other electronic device in conformance with the requirements of the State of California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 22nd day of January, 2024.
Justin Beaver, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ana Sauseda
Director of General Services/City Clerk