Yucaipa City Council
March 11, 2024

AGENDA
City Council
Successor Agency · Housing Authority
March 11, 2024
City Hall - City Council Chambers
34272 Yucaipa Blvd., Yucaipa, California
The City Council serves as the Board for the Yucaipa Successor Agency and Commission for the Yucaipa Housing Authority.

Public Comment will be called at the time and place noted on the Agenda below for the general public to address the City Council, Successor Agency and Housing Authority. Please complete a speaker’s form and return it to the City Clerk prior to the beginning of the meeting. Public Comment will be conducted in accordance with the Rules of Procedure adopted pursuant to Resolution No. 2023-07. There is a three-minute time limit for speaking and time may not be ceded to another speaker.

Public Comment Via Mail or Email
Items must be submitted no later than three (3) business hours prior to the meeting at which the commenter seeks to provide comment. Public comment may be submitted via U.S. Mail to the City Clerk at 34272 Yucaipa Blvd., Yucaipa, CA 92399 or via email to [email protected]. All mail and email correspondence will be archived, distributed to City Council, and retained as part of the public record; however, submissions will not be read out loud during the meeting. The subject line should specify “Public Comment” and include the date of the meeting.

Written public comment submitted on non-agenda items and on specific agenda items will be made available to the public pursuant to the City of Yucaipa policy regarding the distribution of written public comments at City Council and Commission meetings, which may be accessed on the City’s website at https://yucaipa.gov/agendas-minutes/ . Individuals should be aware that comments provided, including personal information, may be disclosable pursuant to the California Public Records Act.

Live stream/recording of City Council meetings:

Members of the public may watch city council meetings live at: https://yucaipa.gov/live .

Possible Live Stream Disruptions:

While the City of Yucaipa strives for uninterrupted streaming, technical issues may occasionally occur. We ask for your understanding and patience should there be any disruptions during the live Justin Beaver, Mayor
Chris Venable, Mayor Pro Tem
Bobby Duncan, Councilmember
Matt Garner, Councilmember
Jon Thorp, Councilmember
Chris Mann, City Manager
Steven Graham, City Attorney
Ana V. Sauseda, City Clerk
103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

broadcast. We will work diligently to resolve any issues promptly, however, please be advised that the City Council meeting may continue in person while such issues are resolved. Every attempt will be made for the meeting to be recorded and made available for viewing after its conclusion.

CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 PM
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PURSUANT TO GOVT. CODE SECTION 54957 – Public Employment; Annual Public Employee Performance Evaluation - City Manager

B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)
Ana Sauseda v. George Sardeson, et al
San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVSB2310343

OPEN SESSION – 6:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

CLOSED SESSION REPORT

CHANGES TO THE AGENDA

SPECIAL PRESENTATION
YAPS Dog of the Month

PUBLIC COMMENT

CONSENT AGENDA
The following Consent Agenda items are expected to be routine and non-controversial.

Council will act upon them, at one time, without discussion. Any Councilmember or staff member may request removal of an item from the Consent Agenda for discussion.

Members of the City Council also sit as the Board for the Successor Agency and Commission for the Housing Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar.

1. SUBJECT: APPROVE THE CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 26, 2024.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority minutes of February 26, 2024.
203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

2. SUBJECT: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 440
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the second reading of Ordinance No. 440, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, California, adding Section 1.08.070 to the Yucaipa Municipal Code Establishing No Campaign Contribution Limits.

3. SUBJECT: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 442
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the second reading of Ordinance No. 442, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, California, rescinding ordinance number 335 and adopting an amended development agreement between the city of Yucaipa and ACAA, a limited liability partnership, to enable the continued development of a unified commercial center at the southwest corner of Oak Glen Road and 14th street, with the new agreement memorializing changes to the site design and utility improvement responsibility.

4. SUBJECT: EXTENDING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY DUE TO THE 2022 SEPTEMBER STORM EVENT
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council extend the declaration of a local emergency as a result of the 2022 September Storm Event.

5. SUBJECT: EXTENDING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY DUE TO

TROPICAL STORM HILARY
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council extend the declaration of a local emergency as a result of Tropical Storm Hilary.

6. SUBJECT: MONTHLY TREASURER’S REPORT JANUARY 2024
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Monthly Treasurer’s Report for January 2024.

7. SUBJECT: ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION ENGAGEMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Alternative Compliance Examination Engagement for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023.

8. SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT – 13TH STREET SPORTS COMPLEX FACILITY PARKING LOT LIGHTING PHASE I – PROJECT NO. 11189 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Award and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract, and the City Manager or his designee administer the terms of the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Quality Light and Electrical of Bloomington, CA, in the amount of $58,805 for the 13th Street Sports Complex Facility Parking Lot Lighting Phase I – Project No. 11189 (Project); and

303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

2. Approve the amounts of $5,800 for construction contract contingency and $3,000 for construction contract administration, staff time, and inspection, for a total construction budget in the amount of $67,605; and

3. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to administer the distribution of the contract contingency; and

4. Approve the plans and specifications prepared for this Project.

9. SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF THE RESTRICTED GRANT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS AND THE CITY OF

YUCAIPA, COMMUNITY LIBRARY
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ratify the Restricted Grant Agreement Between the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the City of Yucaipa, Community Library signed by the City Manager accepting grant funding not-to-exceed $1 million.

10. SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2024-05 DECLARING CITY OWNED PROPERTY [PORTION OF ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0303-181-28] AS EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 54221 (F)(1)(C) AND 54221 (F)(1)(D), FINDING THE DECLARATION EXEMPT FROM

THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND TAKING RELATED

ACTIONS
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No.2024-05 declaring, pursuant to Government Code Section 54221, that real property owned by the City [0.33-acre portion of Assessor’s Parcel Number 0303-181-28] is exempt surplus land and not necessary for the City’s use; and

2. Find that such declaration is exempt from environmental review pursuant to section 15062(b)(3) under the California Environmental Quality Act and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption; and

3. Approve the related actions in the resolution.

11. SUBJECT: 2022 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT ACCEPTANCE – POLICE &

FIRE DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2023-24 budget for the 2022 Department of Homeland Security Grant, with an increase in the revenue and expenditure budgets in the amount of $17,994 for the Police Department and $15,675 for the Fire Department.

403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

DISCUSSION ITEMS

12. SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OPPOSING INITIATIVE NO. 21-0042A1 AND JOINING THE “STOP THE TAXPAYER DECEPTION ACT” COALITION RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-06, Opposing Initiative No. 21-0042A1 and Joining the “Stop the Taxpayer Deception Act” Coalition.

13. SUBJECT: WILDWOOD CANYON ROAD ENGINEERING STUDY AND TRAFFIC

ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive an update regarding a traffic analysis completed along Wildwood Canyon Road and provide direction to staff regarding optional traffic improvements.

14. SUBJECT: INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 444

REGARDING SIDEWALK VENDORS AND THE REGULATION OF FOOD TRUCKS RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No. 444, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, California, Repealing Title 5, Chapter 5.12 of the Yucaipa Municipal Code Concerning the Regulation of Peddlers, Hawkers, and Itinerant Vendors and Replacing it with a New Chapter 5.12 Concerning the Regulation of Sidewalk Vendors and Adding Chapter 5.13 Concerning the Regulation of Food Trucks.

15. SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESPONSE TO THE 2023 CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the proposed response to the 2023 San Bernardino County Civil Grand Jury Final Report and direct that the response be filed with the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court and with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.

COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS

ANNOUNCEMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Notice Regarding Americans with Disability Act
The City of Yucaipa complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk’s Department at (909) 797-2489, during normal business hours, at least 48-hours prior to the meeting.

Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the city to make reasonable accommodations to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

CEQA STATEMENT:

Unless stated otherwise on the agenda, every item on the agenda is exempt from CEQA guidelines sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, 15301, 15323 and/or Public Resource Code Section 21065.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.5, any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the City of Yucaipa to all or a majority of the City Council, less than 72 hours prior to that meeting, are available for public inspection at Yucaipa City Hall, 34272 Yucaipa Boulevard, Yucaipa, CA 92399, during normal business hours.

NOTICE REGARDING CHALLENGES TO DECISIONS
Pursuant to all applicable laws and regulations, if you would like to challenge the decision of the City Council on an item appearing on this Agenda, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this Agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
State of California }
County of San Bernardino } ss.

City of Yucaipa }

I, Ana V. Sauseda, City Clerk of the City of Yucaipa, California, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda was posted on 03/07/2024, at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2, at the following locations:

Yucaipa City Hall, 34272 Yucaipa Boulevard, Yucaipa, California City of Yucaipa website www.yucaipa.gov

Ana V. Sauseda, CMC
City Clerk

603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

TO:

FROM:

FOR:

SUBJECT:

Agenda Item No.

CITY OF YUCAIPA

AGENDA REPORT
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Ana V. Saused4 Director of General Services/City Clerk
City Council Meeting of March 11,2024
Approve the City Council/Successor Agency/llousing Authority Minutes of February 26,2024
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve the City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority minutes of February 26,2024.

Attachments:
l. Regular Meeting Minutes - 0212612024
Approved By
1 703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHMENT 1
803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

City of Yucaipa
City Council/Successor Agency/Flousing Authority Minutes Regular Meeting of February 26, 2024
City Hall Council Chambers
34272 Yucai Blvd.Yucai cA 92399
CLOSED SESSION _ 5:

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Beaver called the Closed Session meeting to order at 5:01 p.m.

CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL
PRESENT:Justin Beaver, Mayor
Chris Venable, Mayor Pro Tem
Bobby Duncan, Councilmember
Matt Garner, Councilmember
Jon Thorp, Councilmember
ABSENT: None

PUBLIC COMMFNT
There were no comments.

CLOSED SFSSION
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Paragraph (l) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)
Ana Sauseda v. George Sardeson, et al
San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVSB2310343
The City Council entered Closed Session at 5:01 p.m.

OPEN SESSION - 6:00

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Beaver called to order the Regular Meeting of the City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority at 6:00 p.m.

PI ENGF OF ALLEGI
Pledge of Allegiance was led by Captain Walker.

City Council Minutes Page I of 8
903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

CITY COUNCIL ROLL C
PRESE,NT:Justin Beaver, Mayor
Chris Venable, Mayor Pro Tem
Bobby Duncan, Councilmember
Matt Garner, Councilmember
Jon Thorp, Councilmember
ABSENT: None
STAFF
PRESENT:Chris Mann, City Manager
Jennifer Crawford, Assistant City Manager
Steven Graham, City Attorney
Ana Sause da, Director of General Services/City Clerk

CLOSED SESSION REP
City Attorney Steven Graham announced that settlement direction was given by consensus on Item A.

CHANGES TO THE AGEN
City Manager Chris Mann indicated that there were no changes to the agenda.

SPECIAL PRESENTAT
Yucapture Yucaipa Photo Contest was presented by Community Services Supervisor Mary Johnson.

PUBLIC SAFETY UPDAM
o Police - Captain Walker presented the statistics for January 2024. o Fire - Chief Malinowski presented the statistics for January 2024. o Code Enforcement - Ben Matlock, Deputy Director of Development Services, presented the statistics for January 2024.

PUBLIC COMMENT
The following members of the public spoke:
o Hansen Wang
o Colleen Wang
. George Sardeson
City Council Minutes Page 2 of 8
1003/11/2024 City Council Agenda

1 CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Beaver asked if there were any Consent Agenda items to be removed for discussion. No items were removed for discussion.

SIIB'IECI: APPROVE THE CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSTNG AUTHORITY MTNUTES OF FEBRUARY 12,2024.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority Minutes of February 12,2024.

SUB,IECL EXTENDING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY DUE TO THE 2022 SEPTEMBER STORM EVENT
RECOMMF'.NDATION: That the City Council extend the declaration of a local emergency as a result of the 2022 September Storm Event.

SUB,IE]C[: EXTENDING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY DUE TO

TROPICAL STORM HTLARY
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council extend the declaration of a local emergency as a result of Tropical Storm Hilary.
2 3.

4.SUB,IECI: AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT . TRAFFIC SIGNAL

INSTALLATION FOR THE OAK GLEN ROAD/LIVE OAK CANYON ROAD

WIDENING PROJECT, COLORADO STREET TO OUTER HWY-IO SOUTH RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council
l. Award and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract, and the City Manager or his designee administer the terms of the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Belco Elecnor of Chino, CA, in the amount of $314,888 for the Traffic Signal at Oak Glen Road and Colorado Street - Project No. I1089-3 (Project); and

2. Approve the amounts of $30,000 for construction contract contingency and $23,000 for construction contract administration, staff time, and inspection, for a total construction budget in the amount of $367,888; and

3. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to administer the distribution of the contract contingencyi and

4. Approve the plans and specifications prepared for this Project.

City Council Minutes Page 3 of 8
1103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

-5.SUB,IECI: AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - AVENUE E & l5TH STREET SIDEWALKS PROJECT, PHASE 2
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
l. Amend the FY 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program by approving the amounts of $270,735 for the l5th Street Sidewalks ATP Project - Project No. I I 184, $27,000 for construction contract contingency and $21,000 for construction contract administration, staff time, and inspection, for a total construction budget in the amount of $318,735; and

2. Accept State Active Transportation Grant award in the amount of $320,000; and

3. Award and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract, and the City Manager or his designee administer the terms of the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Three Peaks of Calimesa, CA, in the amount of $270,735 for the l5th Street Sidewalks ATP Project - Project No. I I 184 (Project); and

4. Approve the plans and specifications prepared for this Project.

ACfION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER THORP, SECOND BY
CoUNCILMEMBER DUNCAN, CARRTED 4-0-0-1, (MAYOR pRO TEM
VENABLE RECUSED HIMSELF) TO APPROVE ITEM NO. 1.

ACfION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER THORP, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER DUNCAN, CARRIED 5.0, TO APPROVE ITEM NOS.2.5.

DISCUSSION ITEMS

6. SUBIECI: YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOTNTMENT
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
l. Review the attached Application for the At-Large Membership to the Youth Advisory Committee (YAC); and

2. Vote on the appointment of the nominated applicant.

IUSCIJSSIOIT: Recreation Superintendent Martinez presented the Agenda Report.

After Council discussion, the following Motion was made:

AEf.I]ON: MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM VENABLE, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER THORP, CARRIED 5-0, TO APPOINT GRETCHEN LEWIS TO THE YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE.

City Council Minutes Page 4 of 8
1203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

7 SIJBJECI: TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
l. Review the attached Citizen Service Applications and nominate one applicant for the At-Large Membership to the Trails and Open Space Committee; and

2. Vote on the appointment of the nominated applicant.

DISCIISSIOIT: Assistant City Engineer Kern presented the Agenda Report.

ACf.IQN: MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM VENABLE, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER GARNER, CARRIED 5.0, TO APPOINT SHAWN BURDINE TO THE TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE.

SIJBJECI: ADOPTION OF ORDTNANCE RELATED TO CAMPAIGN
CONTzuBUTION LIMITS
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

Approve the Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No. 440, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, Califomia, Adding Section 1.08.070 to the Yucaipa Municipal Code Establishing No Campaign Contribution Limits; or

2. Approve the Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No. 443, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, California, Adding Section 1.08.070 to the Yucaipa Municipal Code Related to Campaign Contribution Limits.

DISCUS$ION: City Attorney Graham presented the Agenda Report.

The following member of the public spoke:
o Kevin Miskin
After Council discussion, the following Motion was made:

ACIION: MOTION BY MAYOR BEAVER TO APPROVE THE INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO.443 FAILED DUE TO A LACK OF A SECOND.

ACf,IQN: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER GARNER, SECOND BY
CoUNCILMEMBER THORP, CARRTED 4-1, (MAYOR BEAVER VOTED NO)

TO APPROVE THE INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO.440.

City Council Minutes Page 5 of 8

8. 1303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

9.SIJBIECI: FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 MID-YEAR BUDGET UPDATE
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
l. Review the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Update; and

2. Amend the Adopted FY 2023-24 General Fund Budget by increasing budgeted expenditures by $1,557,600; and increasing budgeted revenues and transfer-ins by $1,169,000; and

3. Amend the Adopted FY 2023-24 Fire Fund Budget by increasing budgeted expenditures by $109,000; and

4. Amend the Adopted Capital Improvement Plan by increasing budgeted expenditures by $ I , I 3 5,000 and increasing budgeted revenues by $63 5,000, as well as corresponding technical transfers; and

5. Approve the procurements with Best Contracting Services, [nc. (senior center roof) and RDO Equipment Company (Chipper) in accordance with the City's Purchasing Policy; and

6. Approve the procurements with Sunstate Equipment Rental (skip loader rental), Quinn Equipment (skip loader purchase), Johnson Equipment (Battalion Chief truck) and Express Events (STARS programming) and dispense with competitive bid procedures for each as per Section 2.24.060 of the City of Yucaipa Municipal Code.

DISICIJS,1IQLI: Director of Finance White presented the Agenda Report.

After Council discussiotr, the following Motion was made:

ACIION: MoTIoN

COUNCILMEMBER

BY MAYOR PRO TEM
THORP, CARRIED 5-0,

VENABLE, SECOND BY

TO APPROVE STAFF'S
RECOMMENDATION.

IO. SUB,IE]CI: FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET PREPARATION
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive an update on the budget preparation for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

IUSICUSSIOII: Director of Finance White presented the Agenda Report.

City Council Minutes Page 6 of 8
1403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

I l.

PUBLIC HEARING
SUB,IECI: GATEWAY COMMERCIAL PLAZA (CASE NO. 23-094/CUP/ARC/DA);

A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR THE

FTNAL PHASE OF THE YUCAIPA GATEWAY PROJECT THAT INCLUDES THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1,500 SQUARE FOOT DRIVE-THROUGH COFFEE SHOP AND A 2,492 SQUARE FOOT DRIVE-THROUGH RESTAURANT ON
APPROXIMATELY I.95 ACRES, THE CONTINUATION OF THE YUCAIPA

GATEWAY PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OAK GLEN ROAD AND I4TH STREET. THE APPLICANT ALSO PROPOSES AN AMENDED

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY TO REFLECT THE CURRENT PROJECT AND UPDATES. APN: 0301-182-ll AND 12, AND 0301-183-18, 19,20 AND 2I
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a public hearing and consider the Planning Commission's recommendation to:
l. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 23-094, and if acceptable, the Architectural Design and conceptual landscaping, subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in the Agenda Report; and

2. Adopt the Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and

3. Approve the introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 442, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, Califomia, rescinding Ordinance No. 335 and adopting an Amended Development Agreement between the City of Yucaipa and ACAA, a Limited Liability Partnership, to enable the continued development of a unified commercial center at the southwest corner of Oak Glen Road and l4th Street, with the new agreement memorializing changes to the site design and utility improvement responsibility and the amended development agreement as part of the proposed project; and

4. Determine that the Project does not require any additional environmental review pursuant to Section 15162(a) of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and

5. Direct Staff to f-rle a Notice of Determination.
o Public Hearing Opened
Mayor Beaver opened the Public Hearing for ltem No. I I at7,23 p.m. o staff Presentation
Assistant Planner Farmer presented the Agenda Report.
o Applicant Presentation
Brief presentation by Alex Mucino
City Council Minutes Page 7 of 8
1503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

o Public Comments
There were no comments
o Applicant Rebuttal
There was no applicant rebuttal.
o Public Hearing Closed
Mayor Beaver closed the Public Hearing at 7:30 p.m.

ACIION: MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM
COUNCILMEMBER THORP, CARRIED 5-0,
RECOMMENDATION.

VENABLE, SECOND BY

TO APPROVE STAFF'S

COUNCILMEMBER REP
Councilmember Duncan announced a scholarship opportunity on behalf of the Southern Califomia Association of Govemments. Mayor Pro Tem Venable announced the upcoming Bunny Hop event. Mayor Beaver announced the 3 ribbon cutting events he attended and welcomed the new businesses.

ANNOUNCEMENTS
The next regularly scheduled meeting will be March 11,2024 at 6:00 p.m.

ADJOIJBNMELTI
The meeting adjourned at 7:33 p.m.

Justin Beaver, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ana V. Sauseda, CMC
Director of General Services/City Clerk
City Council Minutes Page 8 of 8
1603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Agenda Item No.

CITY OF YUCAIPA

AGENDA REPORT
TO:

FROM:

FOR:

SUBJECT:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
Ana V. Sauseda, Director of General Services/City Clerk City Council Meeting of March 11,,2024
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 440
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve the second reading of Ordinance No. 440, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, California, Adding Section 1.08.070 to the Yucaipa Municipal Code Establishing No Campaign Contribution Limits.

Attachment:
l. Ordinance No . 440
Approved By:
2 1703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHMENT I
1803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ORDINANCE NO. 440

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA, ADDTNG SECTION 1.08.070 TO THE YUCAIPA

MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING NO CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION
LIMITS
WHEREAS, the Political Reform Act of 1974 (the "Act"), codified at Govemment Code Section 81000, et seq., was amended by the voters in 1988 to impose contribution limitations for statewide offices, and authorized local jurisdictions to enact contribution limits or other prohibitions; and WHEREAS, in 2019, the State Legislature amended the Act to impose contribution limits on local elective offices in jurisdictions that have not enacted their own contribution limits with the passage ofAssembly Bill ("AB") 571; and
WHEREAS, AB 571 imposes default campaign contribution limits upon cities beginning in January 1,202I;and
WHEREAS, the City of Yucaipa currently does not have campaign contribution limits; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 85702.5(a) authorizes a City to set any local campaign contribution limit by ordinance; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council that this Ordinance impose no limit on campaign contributions.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIF'ORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section l. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein.

Section 2. That Chapter 1.08 Elections shall be amended to add Section 1.08.070 as follows:

Section1.08.070 ClnapalcnCoxrnteurtonLtulrs
(a) The terms used in this Ordinance shall have the same definitions as specified in the Political Reform Act of 1974 (the'oAct"), as amended from time to time, and Regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission (the "FPPC Regulations"), as amended from time to time. (b) Campaign Contribution Limits. The City Council of the City of Yucaipa hereby imposes no limit on campaign contributions that a City Council candidate or candidate's committee may receive per election from any single source.
(c) Campaign Fund Transfers. Candidates may transfer non-surplus campaign funds from one controlled committee to another committee controlled by the same candidate for the same or a different local elective office in the City of Yucaipa and may carry over non-surplus campaign Page I of 2 1903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

funds raised in connection with one municipal election to pay fbr campaign expenditures incurred in connection with a subsequent municipal election without attributing, or being subject to the campaign contribution limit, or using the "last in, first out" or "first in, first out" accounting method. Candidates for local elective office in the City of Yucaipa do not need to establish a separate campaign bank account for redesignated committees for the same or a different City of Yucaipa local elective office. In all other aspects, the Act and FPPC Regulations related to campaign fund transfers shall apply.

Section 3. Severability. If any sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part hereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof or exhibit thereto. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective ofthe fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraph, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.

Section 4. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published or posted in accordance with California law.

Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this I lth day of March, 2024.

Justin Beaver, Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM
Ana V. Sauseda, CMC
Director of General Services/City Clerk
Steven Graham, City Attorney

Agenda Item No.

CITY OF YUCAIPA

AGENDA REPORT
TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ana V. Sauseda, Director of General ServiceVCity Clerk FOR: City Council Meeting of March 11,2024
SUBJECT: Second Reading of Ordinance No. 442
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve the second reading of Ordinance No. 442, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, Califomia, Rescinding Ordinance No. 335 and Adopting an Amended Development Agreement Between the City of Yucaipa and ACAA, a Limited Liability Partnership, to Enable the Continued Development of a Unified Commercial Center at the Southwest Comer of Oak Glen Road and l4th Street, with the New Agreement Memorializing Changes to the Site Design and Utility Improvement Responsibility.

Attachment:
l. Ordinance No . 442
Approved By:4
3 2103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHMENT 1
2203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ORDINANCE NO. 442

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING ORDINANCE NO. 335 AND

ADOPTING AN AMENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF YUCAIPA AND ACAA, A LIMITED LIABILITY

PARTNERSHIP, TO ENABLE THE CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT OF A

UNIFIED COMMERCIAL CENTER AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF OAK GLEN ROAD AND 14TH STREET, WITH THE NEW

AGREEMENT MEMORIALIZING CHANGES TO THE SITE DESIGN

AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT RESPONSIBILITY

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. ACAA, a Limited Liability Partnership ("Developer") proposes to enter into an updated development agreement with the City of Yucaipa (herein, the "Development Agreement"), which is attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit "A," in connection with the development of a commercial center consisting of a hotel; drive-through restaurant; drive- through coffee shop; and convenience store, car wash, and gas station on an approximately 6.92 acre site at the southwest corner of the intersection of Oak Glen Road and 14th Street, in the City of Yucaipa, and described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein by reference (the "Project").

Section 2. The Project, including this Ordinance and the Development Agreement, has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq. ("CEQA"), the State CEQA Guidelines (Califomia Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000, et seq.), and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines. As part of the initial Project approvals, the City had prepared an initial study and, based on the information contained in the initial study, concluded that the Project, with mitigation, would not have any significant impacts on the environment, and prepared a mitigated negative declaration. On November 19, 2014, the City's Planning Commission considered and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Project, which was considered by the City Council in conjunction with consideration of the prior Ordinance and Development Agreement. As part of the phased development, a new land use entitlement has been submitted (Case No. 23-094) along with an amended Development Agreement to reflect the current conditions and site design for the Project. Based on the limited scale of changes, the City Council finds and determines that there are no changes to the Project or its circumstances, or other new information, that would require further environmental analysis pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council hereby finds and determines, in light of the whole record, and in its independent judgment, that there is no substantial evidence that further environmental analysis is necessary for the Project, and the City Council hereby finds the Mitigated Negative Declaration as adopted by the Planning Commission sufficient for taking action on the Development Agreement. The documents and other materials that constitute the record are located in the City's Development Services Department and are in the custody of the Director of Development Services, 34272 Yucaipa Boulevard, Yucaipa, Califomia 92399. 2303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Further, the mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are made applicable to the Project through conditions of approval.

Section 3. On February 7, 2024, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, including the Development Agreement. Notice of the time, place and purpose of the public hearing was duly provided in accordance with Califomia Government Code Sections 65867, 65090, and 65091, and the City's ordinances.

Section 4. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Amended Development Agreement.

Section 5. On February 21,2024, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Development Agreement and the Project. Notice of the time, place and purpose of the public hearing were duly provided in accordance with California Government Code Sections 65867,65090 and 65091, and the City's ordinances.

Section 6. The City Council finds that the provisions of the Development Agreement are consistent with the City of Yucaipa General Plan and comply with its objectives and policies.

The Development Agreement is consistent with and implements the objectives of the land use element, particularly for development of land designated for service commercial development, consistent with the permitted uses in that land use district.

Section 7. The City Council hereby approves the Development Agreement and authorizes the Mayor to execute the Development Agreement on behalf of the City.

Section 8. No later than ten (10) days after the effective date of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall record with the County Recorder a copy of the Development Agreement and the notice shall describe the land to which such contract applies.

Section 9. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a summary of this Ordinance to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City within fifteen (15) days after its passage, in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; and shall certiff to the adoption of this Ordinance. \
\\
\
\
\
\\
2403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this llth day of March,2024.

Justin Beaver, Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM
Ana V. Sauseda, CMC
Director of General Services/City Clerk
Steven Graham, City Attorney
2503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

EXHIBIT A

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
2603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

EXHIBIT B

LIIGAL DESCRIPTION
The Property situated in the State of California, County of San Bemardino, City of Yucaipa described as follows: A portion of lots 61, 62, 66,73 & 74 if Tract 2187, in the City of Yucaipa, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in book3l, page 71, in the office of the County Recorder of said county. (A.P.N. 0301- I 82- l I & 12 and 0301-083- 18, 19, 20 &.21')
2703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Agenda ltem No.

CITY OF YUCAIPA

AGENDA REPORT
TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROVI:Trevor Benson, Public Safety
FOR:City Council Meeting of March I l, 2024
SUBJECT:Extending the Existence of a Local Emergency Due to the 2022 September Storm Event
2022 SEPTEI}IBER STORNI BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On September 14, 2022, the Yucaipa City Manager proclaimed a local emergency due to the2022 September Storm Event in Yucaipa and surrounding communities. The storm which was caused by remnants of Hurricane Kay produced conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the City of Yucaipa, in the form of infrastructure damage, from extreme weather including intense rain, wind, flooding and debris flow.

On September 14,2022, the County of San Bernardino declared a County-Wide, local emergency due to the storm.

At the September 20,2022, Special City Council Meeting, Council adopted Resolution No. 2022- 54, ratifoing the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency by the City Manager.

Post storm assessments were conducted in the burn areas and debris basins to identifu on-site and downstream threats to public health or safety from landslides, debris flow, flooding, road hazards and other post-fire related concerns, as well as to determine measures to prevent or mitigate identified threats.

As a direct result of the September Storm Event, several areas within the City were impacted, requiring emergency work, such as El Dorado Park, Oak Glen Road and Pendleton Road. Staff is tracking costs for this required emergency response work necessary to address these areas. In addition to the emergency work performed to close, cleanup and reopen City facilities/roadways, additional emergency work was required to address approximately 18,000 cubic yards of mud, silt and debris that impacted areas within the Wilson III Basin/Channel area. In addition, the Oak Glen Creek Basin system sustained approximately 25,000 cubic yards of mud, silt, and debris, that, in conjunction with San Bernardino County Flood Control District was removed.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council extend the declaration of a local emergency as a result of the 2022 September Storm Event.
4 2803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Subsequently, in August the City experienced another significant storm event, Tropical Storm Hilary creating rainfall totaling as much as 4.5 inches in parts of the community, once again testing the systems constructed over the past twenty years and maintained between and during these storm events.

Pursuant to Yucaipa Municipal Code Section 8.36.160, the City Council shall review, at least every fourteen (14) days, unless waived by the City Council to meet State requirements, until such local emergency is terminated, the need for continuing the local emergency.

Such declaration facilitates the City's response to combat perilous conditions by providing limited immunity for emergency actions of public employees and governing bodies, authorizing the issuance of orders and regulations to protect life and property, and activating pre-established local emergency provisions.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None with this item.

Approved by:
2903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

TO
Agenda ltem No.

CITY OF YUCAIPA

AGENDA REPORT
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Trevor Benson, Public Safety vtunug{T|)
\_/
City Council Meeting of March 11,2024
Extending the Existence of a Local Emergency Due to Tropical Storm Hilary
FROM:

FOR:

SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council extend the declaration of a local emergency as a result of Tropical Storm Hilary.

TROPICAL STORM BA GROTJND/DISCUSSION:

On Sunday, August 20, 2023, the Yucaipa City Manager Chris Mann proclaimed a local emergency due to Tropical Storm Hilary in Yucaipa and surrounding communities. The storm which was caused by remnants of Tropical Storm Hilary produced conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the City of Yucaipa, in the form of infrastructure damage, from extreme weather including intense rain, wind, flooding and debris flow.

On August 20,2023, the County of San Bemardino also declared a County-Wide, local emergency due to the storm and on August 19,2023, the State of California pre-emptively proclaimed a state of emergency in several counties including County of San Bernardino.

At the August 24,2023, Special City Council meeting, Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-43, ratifuing the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency by the City Manager.

Post storm assessments were conducted in the burn areas and debris basins to identiff on-site and downstream threats to public health or safety from landslides, debris flow, flooding, road hazards and other post-fire related concems, as well as to determine measures to prevent or mitigate identified threats.

As a direct result of the tropical storm, several areas within the City were impacted, requiring emergency work, for Oak Glen Road, Casa Blanca and Pendleton Road. Staff is tracking costs for the required emergency response work necessary to address these areas. In addition to the emergency work performed to close, cleanup and reopen City facilities/roadways, additional emergency work was required to address approximately 100,000 cubic yards of mud, silt and debris that impacted areas within the Wilson III Basin/Channel area. In addition, the Oak Glen 5 3003/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Creek Basin system sustained approximately 50,000 cubic yards of mud, silt, and debris, that, in conjunction with San Bernardino County Flood Control District was removed.

Pursuant to Yucaipa Municipal Code Section 8.36.160, the City Council shall review, at least every fourteen (14) days, unless waived by the City Council to meet State requirements, until such local emergency is terminated, the need for continuing the local emergency.

Such declaration facilitates the City's response to combat perilous conditions by providing limited immunity for emergency actions of public employees and governing bodies, authorizing the issuance of orders and regulations to protect life and property, and activating pre-established local emergency provisions.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None with this item.

Approved by
3103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Agenda Item No.

TO

CITY OF YUCAIPA

AGENDA REPORT
Honorable Mayor and City Council
tchris Mann, City Manager/Treasurer
@ehil white, Director of Finance
City Council Meeting of March I l, 2024
Monthly Treasurer's Report January 2024
FROM:

FOR:

SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council receive and file the Monthly Treasurer's Report for January 2024.

BACKGROUND:

To comply with the requirements of California Government Code Section 53607 and the recommendation of California Government Code Section 53646, a treasurer's report is submitted to Council monthly.

DISCUSSION:

It is the responsibility of the Finance staff to develop the Monthly Treasurer's Report in a timely manner for review by the City Manager/Treasurer, and ultimately the City Council. It is the function of the Treasurer to deposit and invest funds in accordance with the Investment Policy of the City of Yucaipa to achieve the stated objectives of safety and preservation of capital, liquidity, and retum on investment. The purpose of the Monthly Treasurer's Report is to provide the City Council with a snapshot of the City's cash and investment portfolio.

The balances included in the Treasurer's Report represent the month-end market value of the City's investment portfolio. The portfolio is one component of assets. The City's net position or fund balance (equity) is comprised of all assets less liabilities. As such, the amounts are related but will differ due to accruals and methods of accounting. The City utilizes the Monthly Treasurer's Report as one tool to monitor fiscal perfornance.

While the City does not have outstanding debt related to bond issuances, the City acts in a fiduciary capacity for the Successor Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency and the Chapman Heights Community Facilities District, both of which maintain outstanding bonds. The City pools cash and investments of all funds, except for assets related to the bond issuances of the Successor 6 3203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Agency and Community Facilities District which are required to be held in separate accounts with fiscal agents in accordance with the bond indentures.

As required by the Investment Policy, the attached Treasurer's Report includes a certification that (l) All investment actions executed since the last report have been made in full compliance with the Investment Policy; and (2) the City will meet its expenditure obligations for the next six months.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact.

Attachments:
l. Treasurer's Portfolio Historical Balances

2. Treasurer's Report - January 2024

3. Treasurer Managed Portfolio Summary - January 2024

4. LAIF Quarterly Interest Statement - January 2024

5. Wells Fargo Operating Account - January 2024

6. Investments with Fiscal Agent Summary
3303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHME,NT 1
3403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

C'trJDI@
aYl'ctlrt
Itl'(vlt,
Erttrtr€Jaa}t'rrl1t
.vtdtat?(vr'ctrrG,srrl
{a
$ct'.tta^
a\loloo
G.14.(v!
de-7a
tB
q
t\a\lFr
Sfr'l)a\ra6arl
fr!tF^tGIctrlYlsft>
FrtIGt
daila^
Er
q
|C Trtr)
F
sILt
GI.{d€Ir4.oa
!tF.{6oL
FaY!IE*v,
GIGI
-aar{ts-
R(cD
tsrr!VD
b
€eB.tl
(\ar.)ti(vtC-
C'r(vt(('lIar,
rtt!r{s.7L
Itt7at?
6-a
C'TaYl
odG'Gt
Fa
?irtt1r,
q
XI|gI
Et-a'rttVD
UaI
GIr{dAIo
Esat
EaF8irtt
Itl-rtra^
q
(vl(rt
rfis
ol'a
adras
G.Iv,
trliGArttcl's
avl'rtrat
l-aEt-,
10FI
GIot\
Eua.Y!Itt
to-dh
3'
q
aroJa
d'
tB
Eteace.
ca
fr.

T8.tl
.u
E
fra,\_
GI.Yl
rrlqf
GI
FTGIrDda^
t-aFIF
@'!\
F.ol'rtlt'>
.{r{
Btt
a+l'rrl+Irr.}
r{oq
r-a(t'!
GD
lo'6r14.
at{
tB
Ep
=EaE
a..IFlqo
h'h€
|CI
!B
q
h
h
lra
GT
rCDGtrtrIrtv,
aGI(r)G'
GTrtt
F.a\ttB
adG'so
eB'd
$'
C'rrftrttFo
r$rtIVD
BarttEa\ttB
a
-arat\
rttarttItrvl
trg
HbUdItcr'fi(l'rItll^rol}JC'I(NFT.d-atB rttal;[thlID\6atts.rtt\t{tloqos€ar>dGD.-J.vlC'Tlrl'ootscr'Itta^a\ld!(YDi4)€t81\l@'rrtVDFt\.cri-?(\lo'rraF@'rttvl@C'Tdtsrtto'R(Yl'a 0r-
U)
trAv
F-U
rtr(v,
c.lrrr
\
UIq,(JEg
.U
GO>l-
=lrl
tUC'bF
E
EFa
-i
.c)
h
1 n
oq
E
Q.

EJo'dv,
Bg
g
$a,r>
oq
E
EBatt
a
Eg
B
oo
Ei
EIv}
oo
Eg
g
ag
g
Ratl
tg
g
g
1}
I
/
I
\
\
lt 3503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHMENT 2
3603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

I nstitution/l nvestment Type
December 2023
Balance
January 2024
Balance
Funds Under Control of the Citv:

U.S. Bank lnvestment Account - Managed by PFM
Cash and Equivalents
U.S. Bank lnvestment Account - Managed by Treasurer
Cash and Equivalents
U.S. Government lssues
Corporate lssues
Foreign lssues
Municipal lssues
Loca I Agency lnvestment Fund (LAIF)
City Checking Account (Wells Fargo)
Petty Cash / Change Drawers
7r8.32S $118.85
S 3,07 4,270.02
s 30,893,673.39
S 4,007,473.51
s 237,128.15
S 180,1G2.00
s 2,709,978.63
s 31,775,414,82
S 3,G03,8 46.40
S 237,806.80
s 187,024.50
s 38,398,7A7 .07 s 38,5 L2,971.15
S 15,169,849.89
S 4,t22,760.16
s 2,75000
S rs,26L,595.09
s 6,g2g,931.go
s 2,750.00
Total Funds Under Control of the City S s7,694,185.44 ; 60,606,366.89 Funds with Fiscal Agents:

Bank of New York Mellon
CFD 98-1 - Invesco Govt Agency Private 1903
U.S. Ba n k
RDA 1998 TAB - Blackrock lnstl Funds
RDA 1998 TAB - LAIF
RDA 2004 TAB - Blackrock lnstl Funds
RDA 2010 TAB - Blackrock Instl Funds
S
S
S
S
s
286,237.52
s89.62
45,973.28
159,378.87
375,476.14
287,393.56S
S
S
S
S
592.24
46,4tL.75
160,088.84
377,748,77
Total Funds with Fiscal Agents s 867,655.43 s 871,635.10 Grand Total S 58,501,840.87 s 61,478,001.99
City of Yucaipa
Treasurer's Report - January 3L,2024
Attachment 2

1. All investment actions executed since the last report have been made in full compliance with the lnvestment Policy; and

2. The City will meet its expenditure obligations for the next six months.

Treasur"r'A1?L ?-{-zf
Sign / Date
3703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHMENT 3
3803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

s(f)u?toO06lat!
aozod)
"t' ' ' ''' t' :,'. . . ';.
' t' '
'" r; "
. . , ,:. .
. . ,;, .
,;, . . ...
. . .i.. .
..,.:
" :' '
., :. .
.:. . , ,;.
, >,&,{
,. =,E-'fl'a
l-
IU
@
,,. () ,. F-LL=
38rq;o<
5-Fl?CD$ooI(r)
N$5"?3eI
N- I
S?-O rONrNO 3903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHMENT 4
4003/11/2024 City Council Agenda

xo-ao
o)
E
o)
oa
-g:lo)o
E,
oo)
oo
o
oo
0)
o
E
=o
oo-
O\ O\ogq
O\ \n$o\oo \n
a\a
o\ Fi\o \oa(-t\n \n
Ff F(
U()
t-Eo)-(.)ctrCc0soo cctr-cQ'E bo
t- ttI-'5o E()trc0rl]
(^) Oa(q.r; o
$\
o\
Lar-rLp ..Glr--l cu
=l BEl .=tral A E:l :i .=
=l d=
EI EEil €€
OC\l.t\n
=$- t\-O'^
.t-atrO,
Lq)--GU
-Iq)
No-l-o
arI
*r, r-
=2
Fa
a
trLr
€E+
-o=j
trr.Fq).=E car--OOtrtrooo=\ouzx
c o :E* aFF C
-rlL
.9
EE X
EA ECll-L-
q)
.'- (D c!-€-!{ c! a(ga N
H=
!.
(.)
F()
+-,
Ctra
$c!Oc\
L(g)
(!
El
I
aaLq)
a^,-;
FI
-t-z
!-Lr,-oII
Aol
:El
5l
?l
01 .-rFI
EI
FI
iieER
fi^
Co
=(E
f,q,o
E,
tL
5 =to
O)
tc!
lr)
N 4103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHMENT 5
4203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Analyzed Business Checking r PF
Account number:7100844500 I January 1,2024 -January 31,2024 I Page 1 of5 Questions?

CITY OF YUCAIPA

GEN ERAL OPERATING ACCOUNT
34272 YUCAIPA BLVD
YUCAIPA CA 92399-2434
Call your Customer Service Officer or Client Services
1 -800-AT WELLS (1 -800-289-3ss7)
5:00 AM TO 6:00 PM Pacific Time Monday - Friday
Online: wellsfa rgo.com
Write: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (1 14)
P.O. Box 6995
Portland, OR 97 228-6995
Account summary
Analyzed Business Checking - PF
Account number balance Total credits Total debits balance s4,122,760.16 7
C red its
Deposits
Eff ective Posted
dote date Amount Transaction detoil01/09 1,160.00 Deposit 01 /09
01 /11
01 /16
01 /19
01 l2s
01 /25
3,660.00
s80.00
51 0.00
140.00

10.00 1 ,1 70.00
Deposit
Deposit
Deposit
Deposit
Deposit
Deposit
57,230.00 Total deposits
Electron ic deposits/ban k cred its
Eff ective Posted
Amount Transaction detail
p
01/03
01 /04
01 /04
01 /04
01/04
01/04
01 /0s
01 /08
01 /08
01 109
01/10
01/10
261 ,529.77
1 ,621 .00
5,674.00
45,558.36
108,956.27
5,904.16
9,616.36
4,131 .52
13,020.02
12,853.73
91 .00
91 .00
Desktop Check Deposit
Turbo Data EFT CC Pmts Yucaipa City of Yucaipa
01 /04 Deposit Capture Bank Catd I
Desktop Check Deposit
Apport St of CA Apsapports 122923 1927 Yucaipa City Treasurer ZBA Funding Account Transfer From
01/05 Deposit Capture Bank Card
01/08 Deposit Capture Bank Card
Desktop Check Deposit
Desktop Check Deposit
Cash Only Customer Deposit
Cash Vault Deposit
02010 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

All rigtrts reserved. irtember FDIC.
0 r4)
Sheet Seq - 00501 38
Sheet0000l of 00005
J
4303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHMENT 6
4403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

City of Yucaipa
lnvestment with Fiscal Agent Summary
tY 2024
Ll3Ll2024
Bank of New York Mellon CFD 98-1
324812 Special Acct
324813 Interest Acct
703L29 COI Acct
880553 COI Acct
880554 Reserve Acct
880555 Admin Exp Acct
S
S
S
S
S
S
4,7 55.55
95,426.46
12,068.98
22,577.73
L4,499.36
L37,955.38
Total S 287,393.56
U.S. Bank
RDA 1998 TAB
67LLGL6700 Project Acct - Blackrock lnstl Funds
67L1616701 lnterest Acct - Blackrock lnstl Funds
67L1616702 Principal Acct - Blackrock lnstl Funds
67L1616703 Sinking Acct - Blackrock lnstl Funds
67LL5L5704 Reserve Acct - Blackrock lnstl Funds
67 LLGL5704 Reserve Acct - LAIF
S
S
S
s
S
s

0.24 548.79

30.51 L2.39

0.2L
46,4LL.75
Total S 47,003.99
RDA 2OO4 TAB
67LL740700 Project Acct - Blackrock lnstl Funds
67LL740701 lnterest Acct - Blackrock lnstl Funds
67LL740702 Principal Acct - Blackrock lnstl Funds
67LL740703 Reserve Acct - Blackrock lnstl Funds
s
s
s
s

0.L2
13,398.41
L99.57
L46,490.7 4
Tota I S 150,088.84
RDA 2O1O TAB
67LL740705 Reserve Acct - Blackrock lnstl Funds S 377 ,L48.7 L 4503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

TO
Agenda Item No.

CITY OF YUCAIPA

AGENDA REPORT
Honorable Mayor and City Council
White, Director of Finance
City Council Meeting of March 1 1, 2024
Alternative Compliance Examination Engagement for Fiscal Year Ended June 30,2023
FROM:

FOR:

SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council receive and file the Alternative Compliance Examination Engagement for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023.

DISCUSSION:

The Single Audit Act generally requires an annual audit of non-Federal entities that expend 5750,000 or more of Federal Financial Assistance in a fiscal year. However, although during Fiscal Year 2022-23, the City of Yucaipa exceeded the $750,000 threshold, it was only due to the expenditure of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) dollars. Because of this unusual result, the City qualified for, and opted to have an Altemative Compliance Examination Engagement (ACEE) performed in lieu of a single audit.

This alternative approach to a Single Audit under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, permits eligible recipients to engage a practitioner to perform a compliance examination engagement in accordance with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) Government Auditing Standards. The GAO Govemment Auditing Standards direct practitioners to conduct these engagements in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statements on Standards for Attestation Engagements. The AICPA attestation standards are codified in the AT-C section of the AICPA's Professional Standards and AT-C Section 315, Compliance Attestation, which is the standard to be followed.

The City engaged Van Lant & Fankhanel, LLP (VLF) to perform the ACEE and an unmodified opinion was rendered on February 8,2024.

The ACEE deliverable satisfies the City's reporting requirement for expenditures of federal awards for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
7 4603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact of the recommended action.

Attachment:
l. FY 2022-23 Altemative Compliance Examination Engagement Approved by:

I
4703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHME,NT 1
4803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Von Lonl e
Fonkhonel, LLP
(iertrfred Publrc Accourrtants
!ndependent Auditor's Report on Compliance for the U.S. Department of Treasury Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program (CSLFRF) Requirements for an Alternative CSLFRF Compliance Examination Engagement City Council
City of Yucaipa
Yucaipa, California
We have examined the City of Yucaipa's (the Ci$) compliance with the compliance requirements "activities allowed or unallowed" and "allowable cosVcost principles" (the specified requirements) as described in Part lV "Requirements for an Alternative Compliance Examination Engagement for Recipients That Would Othenarise be Required to Undergo a Single Audit or Program-Specific Audit as a Result of Receiving Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds" of the CSLFRF section of the 2023 OMB Compliance Supplement (referred to herein as "Requirements for an Alternative CSLFRF Compliance Examination Engagement") during the year ended June 30, 2023. Management of the City is responsible for its compliance with the specified requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the City's compliance with the specified requirements based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the AICPA; the standards applicable to attestation engagements contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and in the "Requirements for an Alternative CSLFRF Compliance Examination Engagement." Those standards and requirements require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the City complied, in all material respects, with the specified requirements referenced above. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about whether the City complied with the specified requirements. The nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks of material noncompliance, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We are required to be independent and meet our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with relevant ethical requirements relating to the engagement.

Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the City's compliance with specified requirements.
ln our opinion, the City of Yucaipa complied, in all material respects, with the specified requirements referenced above during the year ended June 30, 2023.

Van Lent & Fankhanel, LIP
29970 Technology Drive Suite 105 A
Murrieta CA 92563
s9 856 6879
1 4903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards ln accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we are required to report all deficiencies that are considered to be significant deficiencies or materialweaknesses in internal control; fraud, and noncompliance with provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, or grant agreements that have a material effect on City's compliance with the specified requirements and any other instances that warrant the attention of those charged with governance. We are also required to obtain and report the views of responsible officials concerning the findings, conclusions, and recommendations, as well as any planned corrective actions. We performed our examination to express an opinion on the City's compliance with the specified requirements and not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the internal control over the specified requirements or on compliance and other matters; accordingly, we express no such opinions. The results of our tests disclosed no matters that are required to be reported under Govemment Auditing Sfandards. lntended Purpose
The purpose of this examination report is solely to express an opinion on whether the City complied, in all material respects with the specified requirements referenced above during the year ended June 30, 2023. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.

Lk+ YM,//F
Murrieta, CA
February 8, 2024
2 5003/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Agenda Item No.

CITY OF YUCAIPA

AGENDA REPORT
TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council
Fermin Preciado, Director of Development ServiceVCity Engineer L// 'ta( f ".Landon Kern, Assistant City Engineer LK
Todd Gutjahr, Public Works Analyst l,( tue T.b .

FROM:

FOR:City Council Meeting of March 11,2024
SUBJECT: Award of Contract - l3th Street Sports Complex Facility Parking Lot Lighting Phase I - Project No. I1189
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council:
l) Award and authorizethe City Manager to execute a contract, and the City Manager or his designee administer the terms of the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Quality Light and Electrical of Bloomington, CA, in the amount of $58,805 for the l3th Street Sports Complex Facility Parking Lot Lighting Phase I - Project No. I I 189 (Project); and
2) Approve the amounts of $5,800 for construction contract contingency and $3,000 for construction contract administration, stafftime, and inspection, for a total construction budget in the arnount of $67,605; and
3) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to administer the distribution of the contract contingency; and
4) Approve the plans and specifications prepared for this Project.

BAC KGRO UN D/DI SC U SSION :

On March 26, 2012, the City Council approved a Development and Operations Agreement (Agreement) with Yucaipa Valley National Little League (YVNLL) for the phased construction and use of the 13ft Street Sports Complex Facility (Sports Complex). The Agreement identified the components for which the City would be responsible and the components for which Y\rNLL would be responsible. Over the years, the City Council has approved several amendments to the Agreement, primarily to recognize and address the community's extensive volunteer efforts to complete the facility's phased construction such as the annual Make a Difference Day events. The initial phases of the Sports Complex have been constructed and have been open for use by YVNLL for several years. Subsequent construction phases were identified in a Letter of Understanding (LOU) between the City of Yucaipa and YVNLL, approved by the City Council in early 2020, which identifies the 8 5103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

City to complete the parking lot improvements supporting the Sports Complex. In accordance with the LOU, YVNLL's fair share of the costs were identified in the amount of $219,800, to be paid with an initial payment in the amount of $90,000 and minimum annual installments of $10,000. These improvements were completed in May of 2021and included the construction of the asphalt parking lot, curb and gutter, concrete sidewalks, a trash enclosure, drainage facilities, and parking lot striping.

The remaining phases of work required to complete the Sports Complex include installing parking lot lighting and landscaping. Staffis currently finalizing the landscaping plans and evaluating options to install solar-powered parking lot lighting, which could potentially be installed with the final phase of improvements. In order to implement safety lighting at the main entrance to the parking lot, staff prepared the engineering plans and specifications for the Project. The Project was advertised for bids on December 11,2023. On January 25,2024, four (4) sealed bids were received and opened as follows:

Contractor Bid Amount
Alfaro Communication Construction, [nc.$ 105,348. l0
MC Electric $96,500.00
Qualitv Lieht and Electrical $5 8,805.00
Belco Elecnor $274,900.00
Quality Light and Electrical (QLE) of Bloomington, CA, is the apparent responsive low bidder. Staff has reviewed the bid documents and determined that the documents meet the requirements of the construction contract specifications. QLE has performed similar work for neighboring agencies, and their work has been deemed satisfactory. As a result, staff recommends that the City Council award and authorizethe City Manager to execute a contract for the Project to QLE in the amount of $58,805.

Completing this Project is a significant milestone for the City and an essential step towards achieving the City Council's Goals for 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The estimated cost of this Project in the amount of $67,605 is included in the adopted FY2023-24 Capital lmprovement Program. No further fiscal impact is anticipated.

Attachments:

1. Bid Summary

2. Construction Agreement - Quality Light and Electrical Approved by H
5203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHMENT 1
5303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

5403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Attachment 2
5503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this llth day of March 2024, by and between the City of Yucaip4 a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and Quality Light and Electrical located at 10055 Alder Ave Contractor / Company Name Sffeet Address
Bloom ington CA 92316 hereinafter referred to as "Conffactor" City State Zip Code Phone
PROJECT: l3th Street Soorts Comolex Facilitv Parkins Lot Liehtine Phase I - Proiect No. I I189 WITNESSETH, in this consideration of their covenants, the parties hereto agree as follows:

The contract documents for the Project shall consist of the Notice Inviting Sealed Bids, Instructions to Bidders, hoposal, General Specifications, Standard Specifications, Special hovisions, Plans, and all referenced specifications and appendices; together with this Agreement and all required bonds, insurance certificates, permits, notices, and affidavits; and also including any and all addenda or supplemental agreements clarifiing, amending, or extending the work contemplated as may be required to ensure its completion in an acceptable manner (collectively, the "Conftact Documents"). The Contract Documents are made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein.

In consideration of such work, City agrees to pay Contractor and Contractor agrees to accept the sum of Fiftv Eisht Thousand. Eisht Hundreded. Five Dollars and 00 Cents ($58.805.00) in the manner provided in the Contract Documents and subject to adjustment provided therein.

Concunently with the execution of this Agreement, Contractor shall file with the City the bonds and certificates of insurance specified in the Contract Documents and subject to adjustment provided therein.

This Contract shall not be assigned without the written permission of the City Council. lN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument the day and year first above written.

ATTEST:CITY OF YUCAIPA
A Municipal Corporation
Ana Sauseda, CMC
Director of General Services/City Clerk

FU N DS AVAI LA BLE/INSURANC E
APPROVED:

Phillip White, Director of Finance
Fermin G. Preciado, Director of
Development Services/Ciry Engineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Chris Mann, City Manager
CONTRACTOR:

Date
Quality Light and Electrical Date
Steven Graham, City Attorney
,
5603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Agenda Item No.

CITY OF YUCAIPA

AGENDAREPORT
TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:Chris Mann, City Manager
Joe Pradetto, Director of Governmental Affairs
FOR:City Council Meeting of March 11,2024
SUBJECT: Ratification of the Restricted Grant Agreement Between the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the City of Yucaipa, Community Library

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council ratifu the Restricted Grant Agreement Between the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the City of Yucaipa, Community Library signed by the City Manager accepting grant funding not-to-exceed $l million.

DISCUSSION
City staff has made significant progress towards delivering the new Yucaipa Branch Library Project (Project). Recent financial commitments from its partners have made the Project viable.

The City Council received an update at its meeting on February 12,2024. During that update, staff informed Council that the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (Tribe) committed to support the Project with a $l million grant.

The Tribe submitted, and the City Manager executed on March 4,2024, the Restricted Grant Agreement Between the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and City of Yucaipa, Community Library (Agreement). The recommended motion would ratiff the City Managers execution of the Agreement.

The Agreement is for $l million. As a condition of the Agreement, the City will work with the Tribe to incorporate culturally appropriate design elements and features into the Project and to recognize the Tribe for its partnership. The grant will be used to match costs from $16 to $18 million, what is projected to be the final million towards construction and grant-matching.

Project Funding
Supervisor Dawn Rowe, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, the County Administrative Office (CAO), and the Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Unified School District, have all played critical roles in making the dream of a new Yucaipa Library a reality. Each of these partners deserve gratitude and special recognition from the community.
9 5703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

The current project contributions are as follows:
o State Library Grant - $9 M
o Supervisor Dawn Rowe - $ I M
o San Manuel Band of Mission Indians - $ t M
o County Administrative Office - $4 M
o city-$3M
o Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Unified School District - Project Site

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact of the recommendation is the acceptance of a $l million grant award. No other fiscal impacts. A complete project costing and request will be brought to the City Council at a future meeting.

Attachment(s):
l. Restricted Grant Agreement Between the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the City of Yucaipa
Approved By 2=
5803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHMENT 1
5903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

RE STRICTED GRANT AGREEMENT
San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
and
City of Yucaipa
Community Library
This Restricted Grant Agreement (this "Agreement") is entered into and made effective this April 1,2024 (the "Effective Date") by and between the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, a federally recognized Indian tribe located on the San Manuel Indian Reservation at 26569 Community Center Drive, Highland, CA, 92346 ("Tribe"), and the City of Yucaipa, a municipal corporation located at34272 Yucaipa Boulevard, Yucaipa, CA92399 ("Grantee"). Tribe, on the one hand, and Grantee, on the other hand, are each referred to herein individually as a "Part5/" and together as the "Parties." I. GRANTEE'S STATUS. This grant is specifically conditioned upon Grantee's status as an eligible grantee of Tribe in accordance with this Section. Grantee represents and warrants that it operates a fund that is a tax-exempt under Section I 70 (bX I )(v) of the Intemal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (hereinafter the "Code"), because Grantee is a govemmental unit as defined by Section I 70(c)( I ) of the Code. Grantee represents and warrants that it is not a private foundation as defined in Section 509(a) of the Code. Grantee will notifu Tribe immediately of any actual or proposed change in its tax status during the Grant Period (as defined below).

II. PURPOSE OF GRANT. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the purpose of Tribe's Grant (as defined below) is to provide funding to help construct a new library facility in the City of Yucaipa (hereinafter "Grant Project"). The Grant (as defined below) is made only for design and construction activities related to the building of the library facility. The grant funds, which includes any interest earned on the funds (hereinafter collectively referred to as rrGrant"), may not be used for any other purpose without prior written approval from Tribe.

IIL OBJECTIVES OF GRANT PROJECT Grantee shall undertake and complete Grant Project within thirty (30) months of the Effective Date unless Tribe agrees in writing to alternative timelines. Grantee will work with Tribe to incorporate culturally-appropriate design elements and features into the Project.

IV. AMOUNT AND PAYMENT OF GRANT. The Parties agree the Grant amount is One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), released to Grantee as a dollar-for-dollar match to meet project costs from Sixteen Million Dollars ($16,000,000.00) to Eighteen Million Dollars ($ 18,000,000).00, and that said Grant shall be used solely to help fund a new community library facility in the City of Yucaipa.

V. PERIOD OF GRANT: TERM OF AGREEMENT. The Grant will be applied to fund the construction of a community library for the period from Effective Date through completion of the Grant Project or within thirty (30) months of Effective Date, whichever first occurs ("Execution Period").

VI. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF GRANT. Grantee agrees that the Grant is subject to the following conditions:

I
6003/11/2024 City Council Agenda

a.Expenditure of Grant Funds.
l. Use of Funds. Grantee will spend the Grant only for the purposes of funding the Grant Project as described above.

2. Payment of Funds to Related Parties of Tribe. No part of the Grant may be paid to any director, officer, employee or citizen (or their family members) of Tribe for any purpose.
b. Return of Funds. Grantee shall return to Tribe any and all Grant funds if Tribe determines in its reasonable discretion that either of the following apply:

1. Grantee has not performed in accordance with this Agreement; or

2. Any portion of the Grant is not used for the Grant Project. c. Records. Audits. Site Visits. The Grant provided by Tribe will be accounted for separately in Grantee's books and records. A systematic accounting record shall be kept by Grantee of the receipt and disbursement of the Grant. Grantee will retain original substantiating documents related to restricted Grant expenditures and make these records available for Tribe's review upon l0 days prior written request. As a material term of this Agreement Grantee agrees to maintain adequate financial records pertaining to the Grant for a minimum of three years after completion of the Grant Project, and acknowledges that Tribe may require Grantee to produce written documentation related to the Grant expenditures in a format appropriate to be forwarded by Tribe to the State of California in order to comply with Compact requirements, and Grantee agrees to timely comply with any such request. Tribe, or a designated representative, reserves the right, upon written notice, to conduct a site visit and/or audit Grantee's books and records relating to the expenditure of the Grant.
d. Reports. Grantee will submit a brief written summative report confirming completion of the Grant Project within sixty (60) days following the end of the Execution Period. e. Expenditures. Expenditures of the Grant must be made substantially in accordance with Section VL Any material changes will be subject to Tribe's prior written approval.
f. Licensine and Credentials. Grantee will maintain, in full force and effect, all required governmental or professional licenses and credentials for itsell its facilities, and for its employees and all other persons engaged in work in conjunction with the Grant. g. Management and Organizational Chanees. Grantee will provide immediate written notice to Tribe if significant changes or events occur during the Execution Period which could potentially impact the progress or outcome of the Grant Project, including, without limitation, changes in Grantee's management personnel or losses of funding from any other sources.
h. Termination. Either Party hereto may terminate this Agreement upon not less than thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the other for failure on the part of such Party to perform a material obligation hereunder, or for a breach of such Party's representation or 2 6103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

wiuranty made in this Agreement. Tribe may terminate this Agreement upon not less than thirty (30) days'prior written notice to Grantee for (i) Grantee's change in the fundamental mission, or (ii) Grantee's implication in an event, or series of events, of such notoriety or opprobrium that the continuation of this Agreement has or will have a negative impact upon Tribe, its image or reputation, or (iii) Grantee's inability to fulfill the requirements for payment set forth herein.

In the event of any termination of this Agreement, Grantee shall return all Grant funds received excluding all expenditures and contractual encumbrances consistent with this Agreement and incurred by Grantee in reliance on this Agreement.

If Tribe terminates this Agreement due to Grantee's breach hereof, Grantee will remove all signage and other identification from the facilities and all other places, things and sites wherever there are references to Tribe (collectively, "All Identification"), at Grantee's sole cost and expense.

Under all events of termination hereunder, the removal of All Identification will be completed as soon as reasonably practical, but in no event later than thirty (30) days after the notice of termination. The foregoing rights and remedies are cumulative of, and in addition to, any rights, remedies or recourses to which the terminating party may be entitled at law or in equity.
i. Public Reportine and Media. [n recognition of the Grant it is the Parties' understanding that Grantee will express its appreciation and provide recognition publicly to Tribe. The Parties will mutually agree in advance on the manner of presentation and contents of such public recognition.
j. Knowins Assumption of Obligations. Grantee acknowledges that it understands its obligations imposed by this Agreement.
k. Terrorist Activity. Grantee represents and warrants that it does not support or conduct, directly or indirectly, violence or terrorist activity of any kind.

I. Identification of Tribe. Grantee shall ensure that Tribe is clearl y identified as a funder or supporter of Grantee in all published material relating to the subject matter of the Grant. All proposed external communications for promotional purposes by Grantee regarding the subject matter of the Grant or the Tribe shall be submitted first to Tribe for its review and written approval.
m Ownership and [Jse of Marks.
l. License. Grantee acknowledges and agrees that Tribe is the owner of all right, title and interest in and to Tribe's name and logo (collectively its "Marks") and that Grantee's use of the Marks pursuant to this Agreement inures to the benefit of Tribe. Tribe hereby grants Grantee a non-exclusive and non-transferable license, without the right to sublicense, to use the Marks solely in connection with providing recognition of the Grant pursuant to this Agreement. Grantee will have no rights in or to the Marks, except as expressly granted herein. Tribe expressly reserves to itself all rights in and to the Marks not expressly granted to Grantee pursuant to this Agreement. The manner and use of the Marks shall comply with all federal and state laws pertaining to trade names, trademarks and service marks in force at any 3 6203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

time and shall clearly indicate Tribe's ownership of the Marks as requested and approved by Tribe.

2. Approval Riehts. All uses of the Marks by Grantee are subject to the prior written approval of Tribe. Grantee will submit to Tribe for approval, at least ten (10) business days prior to its intended first use, all materials which contain the Marks (whether in print media, direct mail, television, radio, internet, email, billboard or in any other form, media or channel). Tribe will have the right to review and approve any copy containing reference to Tribe or including the Marks prior to its use by Grantee. Tribe will use its reasonable efforts to promptly review materials sent by Grantee for approval and will not unreasonably withhold or delay its approval. In no event shall Grantee make any unapproved changes to the Marks. n. Selection of Subgrantees. With regard to the selection of any subgrantees to carry out the purposes of the Grant, Grantee retains full discretion and control over the selection process, acting completely independently of Tribe. There is no agreement, written or oral, by which Tribe may cause Grantee to choose any particular subgrantee. o. No Asency. Grantee is solely responsible for all activities supported by the Grant, the content of any product created with the Grant, and the manner in which any such product may be disseminated. This Agreement will not create any agency relationship, partnership, or joint venture between the Parties, and Grantee will make no such representation to anyone.
p. Remedies. If Tribe determines, in its reasonable discretion, that Grantee has substantially violated or failed to carry out any provision hereof, including but not limited to failure to submit reports when due, Tribe may, in addition to any other legal remedies it may have, refuse to make any further Grant payments to Grantee hereunder or any other grant agreement, and Tribe may demand the retum of all or part of the Grant funds not properly spent or committed to third parties, which Grantee will immediately repay to Tribe. Tribe may also avail itself of any other remedies available at law.
q. Waiver of Claims and Indemnification. Grantee waives any and all claims and recourse against Tribe, including the right of contribution for loss or damages to persons or property arising from, growing out of, or in any way connected with or incidental to fulfillment of the terms and conditions specified in this Agreement. Additionally, Grantee will indemnifu, defend, protect and hold Tribe and its officers, managers, members, employees, agents and representatives, harmless from any cost, expense, claim, demand, liability and/or damage, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs (t'Claims"), arising out of or in connection with, in whole or in part, (i) any false or misleading representation made by Grantee, its agents, employees or delegated representatives in connection with this Agreement, (ii) its breach of any term of this Agreement, (iii) the performance of Tribe's obligations pursuant to this Agreement, or (iv) any claims or actions brought by third parties, including, but not limited to, parties set forth below. Grantee further waives any and all Claims to the extent resulting from, relating to or arising out of (i) the facilities where programs are delivered and/or the operational activities of Grantee therein, including, without limitation, any disputes by, between or among participants, users, guests, or any other attendees and Grantee (or Grantee's respective agents, subcontractors (if any), and employees) or its products and services, any personal injuries sustained by any person at or in connection with the facilities where programs are delivered, and/or any agreements with third parties entered into by Grantee or its agents in connection with the 4 6303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

operation of the same facilities, or (ii) the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of Grantee or its agents, subcontractors (if any), or employees in connection with the subject matter of this Agreement, except to the extent those Claims are directly caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of Tribe or its agents or employees.

The obligations of this Section VI (q) shall survive until the expiration of the statute of limitations applicable to the event giving rise to the Claims. r. Notices. All notices, requests, demands, or other communication permitted or required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed given or made when sent by United States certified or registered mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid, or by a nationally recognized overnight courier, delivery fee prepaid, and in either case to the persons and at the addresses specified below:

If to Tribe:

Chief Intergoverrrmental Affairs Officer
San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
26569 Community Center Drive
Highland, CA 92346
If to Grantee
City Manager
City of Yucaipa
3 427 2 Y ucaipa Boulevard
Yucaipz, CA 92399
The persons and addresses set forth above, from time to time, may be changed by written notice sent as aforesaid to the other Party.
s. Caotions. All captions and headings in this Agreement are for the purposes of reference and convenience only. They shall not limit or expand the provisions of this Agreement.
t. Entire Asreement: Amendments and Modifications. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous oral, wriffen and other agreements between the Parties. This Agreement may not be amended or modified, except in a writing signed by both Parties. u. Governine Law/ Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall at all times be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Califomia applicable to agreements made in California. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of Tribe's immunity to unconsented suit.
v. Non-Assignment. The Parties agree that none of the provisions of this Agreement shall be assigned or delegated to any other person or entity without the prior written consent of the other Party, which consent will be in the Party's sole and absolute discretion. 5 6403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

w. Successors and Assigns. The Parties agree that this Agreement shall be binding upon them and each of their respective successors and permitted assigns. x. Amendment. This Agreement may only be amended in a writing signed by each of the Parties hereto.
y. Waiver. No waiver hereunder will be valid unless set forth in a writing signed by the Party to be bound thereby. Neither the failure nor any delay on the part of either Party to exercise any right or remedy under this Agreement shall operate as a waiver thereof. z. Force Majeure. Each of the Parties shall be excused from performing its obligations under this Agreement if its performance is delayed or prevented by any event beyond such Party's reasonable control, including, but not limited to, acts of Cod, earthquake, fire, explosion, weather, disease, war, insurrection, civil strife, riots government actions, or power failure, provided that such performance shall be executed only to the extent of and during such disability.
aa. Severabilitv. In the event any portion of this Agreement or any amendments or addenda hereto shallbe held illegal, void or ineffective, the remaining portions hereof shall remain in full force and effect. If any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement is in conflict with any applicable statute or rule of law, then such term or condition shall be deemed inoperative to the extent that it may conflict therewith and shall be deemed to be modified to conform to such statute or rule of law.
bb. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which is deemed an original, but allof which taken together shallconstitute one and the same instrument.

The Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS CITY OF YUCAIPA
By ,W By:W
Dan D'Arrigo
Chief Financial Officer
Chris Mann
City Manager
6 6503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

TO
Agenda ltem No._

CITY OF YUCAIPA

AGENDA REPORT
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Fermin Preciado, Director of Development Services/City Engineer Ll( -r-r tr' P.

Landon Kern, Assistant City Engin"", l")(
City Council Meeting of March 11,2024
Resolution No. 2024-05 declaring City owned property [portion of Assessor's Parcel Number 0303-18l-28] as exempt surplus land pursuant to govemment code sections 54221(0(l)(C) and 54221(0(lXD), finding the declaration exempt from the Califomia Environmental Quality Act, and taking related actions FROM:

FOR:

SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council
l. Adopt Resolution No.2024-05 declaring, pursuant to Government Code Section 54221, that real property owned by the City [0.33-acre portion of Assessor's Parcel Number 0303-18l-28] is exempt surplus land and not necessary for the City's use; and

2. Find that such declaration is exempt from environmental review pursuant to section 15062(bX3) under the California Environmental Quality Act and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption; and

3. Approve the related actions in the resolution.

BACKGROUND:

The Wilson III Basin Project ("Project") is identified in the City's original Master Plan of Drainage (MPD) adopted in 1993, and in the most recent update of the MPD, approved in 2012. This regional basin, along with improvements to the Wilson Creek Spreading Grounds between Bryant Street and Fremont Street, has been identified as a critical component of the City's overall effort to reduce peak flow rates in Wilson Creek downstream of the proposed Project, resulting in a reduction of the Wilson Creek floodplain within the City. This facility was identified as a high priority project in the approved MPD to assist in reducing the flood risk in the City.

On May 13,2013, the City Council approved and authorized the Mayor to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) and the City regarding the Project. The MOU detailed the partnership efforts between the City and SBCFCD, including the understanding that SBCFCD owned property, which would not be required for the flood control project located within the vicinity of the proposed Project, would be deemed "surplus" property and would be transferred to the City as SBCFCD contribution. This 10 6603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

"surplus" property will also provide economic development opportunities for the City through the Specific Plan effort to help fund the construction of the Project.

On February 26,2018, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2017-47 approving the Oak Glen Creek Specific Plan; certifuing that the final EIR has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, accepting the mitigation measures identified in the EIR and directing staff to file a Notice of Determination.

Over the duration of the Project, staff has had numerous discussions and meetings with the Wildwood Calvary Chapel (WCC) and the neighboring property owners, to discuss the impacts of the final design of the Wilson Creek Channel realignment along the westem boundary of the Church property, as well as the construction of the substantially completed City Yard facility located on APN 0303-18l-08. The City Maintenance Yard is located directly south of the Church's existing sports fields, as part of the Oak Glen Creek Specific Plan.

On August 26,2019, City Council approved and authorized the Mayor to execute a Land Exchange Agreement by and between the WCC and the City of Yucaipa regarding the exchange of property to accommodate the City Yard and the realignment of Wilson Creek.

DISCUSSION:

In the approved Land Exchange Agreement, WCC is proposing granting approximately 0.69 acres (30,056 S.F. +/-) from the westernmost portion of APN 0303-l8l-08 to the City of Yucaipa, for the purposes of accommodating the realignment of the Wilson Creek Channel and proposed contiguous access road to the new City Maintenance Yard.

In the approved Land Exchange Agreement, the City is proposing granting approximately 0.33 acres (14,375 S.F. +/-) of parcel APN 0303-l8l-28 to Wildwood Calvary Chapel (WCC). The City has already graded the .033 acres to allow for future expanded Church parking.

Under the Surplus Land Act, Govemment Code Sections 54220-54233 (Act), surplus land is land owned in fee simple by the City for which the City Council takes formal action in a regular public meeting declaring the land is surplus and not necessary for the City's use. The Act provides that land shall be declared either surplus land or exempt surplus land before the City may take action to dispose of it consistent with the City's policies or procedures.

Under the Act, land is necessary for the City's use if the land is being used or is planned to be used pursuant to a written plan adopted by the City Council for City work or operations. The Act specifies that the City's use does not include commercial or industrial uses, and land that is disposed of for the sole purpose of investment or generation of revenue is not necessary for the City's use.

The City has determined that the real property exchange is in the public interest and that the City Property is no longer necessary to be retained for the specific uses and purposes of the City and the City intends to subsequently convey the exchanged real property to SBCFCD in connection with the Wilson III Basin Project.
6703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Conveyance of the City Property was reviewed pursuant to the Act, and it was determined to be considered "exempt surplus land" as defined in Government Code section 54221(l)(l)(C) because it is surplus land that the City is exchanging for another property necessary for the City's use. In addition, the conveyance of the City Property was also reviewed pursuant to the Act, and it was determined to be considered "exempt surplus land" as defined in Government Code section 5422(l)(t)(D) because the City subsequently intends to transfer the exchanged real property to the San Bemardino County Flood Control District in connection with the Wilson III Basin Project.

The City has no other obligation related to the Act.

Staff recommends that the City Council find that the exempt surplus land be categorically exempt from environmental review under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines), Section 15312, Surplus Govemment Property Sales, and Section 15061(b), "General Rule" Exemption. The City Property is of no public use, is surplus government property, and is not located in an area of statewide, regional, or area-wide concem as identified in Section 15206(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines. Also, pursuant to Section 15061(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the exchange may have a significant effect on the environment.

In addition, staff is hereby authorized and directed to provide a copy of this Resolution to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in the manner required by HCD.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No fiscal impact
Attachments:
l. Resolution No .2024-05
Approved by
6803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHMENT 1
6903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

RESOLUTION NO.2024.05

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA DECLARING THE FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IN THE CITY.OWNED
PARCEL WITH ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0303-181-28 (A 0.33-

ACRE PORTION OF THE PARCEL) IN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA TO BE

EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTIoNS s4221(F)(lXC) AND s4221(F)(lXD); AND AUTHORIZING THE

CONVEYANCE OF SAID FEE INTEREST TO WILDWOOD CALVARY
CHAPEL IN EXCHANGE FOR ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER O3O3.I8I. 08 (A 0.69-ACRE PORTTON OF THE PARCEL) FROM WTLDWOOD

CALVARY CHAPEL AND FINDING THE DECLARATION EXEMPT

FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITYACT
WHEREAS, the City of Yucaipa ("City") is the owner in fee simple of certain real property in the City withAssessor's Parcel Number 0303-l8l-28 (a 0.33-acre portion of the parcel) and depicted as the purple area in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("City Property"); and
WHEREAS, Wildwood Calvary Chapel ("Church") is the owner in fee simple of certain real property with Assessor's Parcel Number 0303-l8l-08 (a 0.69-acre portion of the parcel) and depicted as the green area in Exhibit A ("Church Property"); and WHEREAS, the City proposes to acquire the Church Property in fee, and in exchange, to convey the fee interest in the City Property to the Church; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that the real property exchange is in the public interest and that the City Property is no longer necessary to be retained for the specific uses and purposes of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City intends to subsequently convey the exchanged real property to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District in connection with the Wilson III Basin Project; and
WHEREAS, under the Surplus Land Act, Government Code sections 54220-54234 ("Act") surplus land is land owned in fee by the City for which the City Council takes formal action in a regular public meeting declaring the land is surplus and not necessary for the City's use and the land must be declared either surplus land or exempt surplus land as supported by written findings; and
WHEREAS, conveyance of the City Property was reviewed pursuant to the Act, and it was determined to be considered "exempt surplus land" as defined in Government Code section 54221(00)(C) because it is surplus land that the City is exchanging for another property necessary for the City's use; and
WHEREAS, conveyance of the City Property was also reviewed pursuant to the Act, and it was determined to be considered "exempt surplus land" as defined in Government Code section 5422(lX0@) because the City subsequently intends to transfer the exchanged real property to the 7003/11/2024 City Council Agenda

San Bernardino County Flood Control District in connection with the Wilson III Basin Project.

The City has no other obligation related to the Act.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section l. The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution.

Section 2.The City Council hereby declares the City Property exempt surplus land to be categorically exempt from environmental review under Title l4 of the California Code of Regulations ("CEQA Guidelines"), section 15312, Surplus Government Property Sales, and section 15061(b), "General Rule" Exemption. The City Property is of no public use, is surplus government property, and is not located in an area of statewide, regional, or area-wide concern as identified in Section 15206(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines. Also, pursuant to Section 15061(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the exchange may have a significant effect on the environment.

Section 3.Staff is hereby authorized and directed to provide a copy of this Resolution to the Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") in the manner required by HCD.

Section 4. Staff is hereby authorized and directed to file a Notice of Exemption.

Section 5.The staff and officers of the City are hereby authorized, jointly and severally, to take such actions as they deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution and all actions previously taken are hereby ratified.

Section 6. The City Clerk shall certiff as to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this l lth day of March, 2024.

Justin Beaver, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ana V. Sauseda, CMC
Director of General Services/City Clerk
7103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Exhibit A
ucatpa
PROPOSED PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT.& LAND SWAP EXHIBIT

PROPOSEO CITY YARD / WILDWOOD CALVARY CHAPEL
=PRffERTY fO 8E ACA)RED 8Y ArY FUruRE D,SIR,CT R/W l'= l20 =PR0PERIY l0 8E ACilJRED 8Y fiLDwOOD CALVARY

OAK GIEN
<n]-z
TU
aE
tU
oto.:it!
tUq()zo
<D
-J
=

CITY YARD
PROPOSEO 15'WIDE

UTILIW EASEMENT WITHIN

CHURCH PROPERW
f-
/
l
fiq
a.
sq
o
=5
7203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

TO:

FROM:

FOR:

SUBJE,CT:

Agenda Item No

CITY OF YUCAIPA

AGENDA REPORT
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Trevor Benson, Public Safety Manager
City Council Meeting of March 11,2024
2022Homeland Security Grant Acceptance - Police & Fire Department

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council accept the 2022 Homeland Security Grant award and approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2023-24 budget for the 2022 Department of Homeland Security Grant, with an increase in the revenue and expenditure budgets in the amount of $17,994 for the Police Department and $15,675 for the Fire Department.

DISCUSSION
The 2022 Homeland Security Grant (HSG) was awarded to the County of San Bemardino for distribution to Fire and Police Departments within the County. Awarded dollar amounts are based primarily on population served. The Yucaipa Police Department (YPD) was awarded the amount of $17,994 and the Yucaipa Fire Department (YFD) was awarded $15,675.

The YPD has a responsibility to protect and serve its citizens at street festivals, fairs, and community events and the City of Yucaipa holds several of these events throughout the year. These events generate revenue for the city and improve the quality of life for the community. The planned purchase of electric specialty bikes would allow YPD deputies to patrol large events while reducing response times to possible incidents and deter terrorism and crime through highly mobile and visible presence.

The YFD's ballistic personnel protective equipment (Body Armor) is currently six years old and past its warranty and acceptable five-year service life. This planned purchase would bring YFD's Body Armor supply back into department policy and acceptable industry standard. YFD personnel are trained in tactical emergency care and have a policy to respond to calls for violence, terrorism, and active shooters. YFD personnel respond concurrent with law enforcement offrcers performing force protection (rescue task force) while law enforcement is actively addressing the threat. This helps save lives and reduce injuries as opposed to historical staging of fire apparatus until the scene is "safe." In- service body armor is a requirement tbr YFD to respond to these incident types per CAL FIRE policy and is consistent with industry standards.
11 7303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

F'ISCAL IMPACT
The recommendation increases budgeted revenus and expenditures in the YPD budget by $17,994 and the YFD budget by $15,674.

Attachment(s):
l. FY22 HSGP Expenditure Authorization Letter dated December 12,2023 Approved By
7403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

?
ATTACHMENT 1
7503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

SAN I}ERNARDINO Office of Emergency ServicesCOUNTY
Luther Snoke
Chief Executive fficer
Daniel Mufroz
Deputy Executrve fficer
December 12,2023
TO:

SUBJEGT:

GRANT PROGRAM MANAGER
FY2022 HOMELAND SECURTTY GRANT PROGRAM (HSGP)

AUTHORIZATION TO SPEND
The Galifornia Governor's Office of Emergency Serviees has approved your FY2022 HSGP project(s). As of the date of this letter, you are authorized to make expenditures using FY2O22 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) funds.

Be aware that your proiect allocation amount may have changed. Take note of the amount located on the attached project worksheet. Should you need to submit a modification request to change your project in any way, including increasing the quantity of items, please do so as soon as possible. The next deadline to submit modification requests is 12131123.

During the procurement process, please make sure to follow grant guidelines and requirements.

Procurement may not begin on projects requiring an EHP or other type of pre-approval until requests are submitted and approval has been obtained.

Please note the following:

1. First Milestone Deadline: All projects should be 30% completed by 3131124.

2. Modifications: Al! project changes require pre-approval from Cal OES orior to incurring any costs. Modification requests are due quarterly. Refer to the FY22 Grant Deadlines for submission dates. The scope of work on projects identified as Nationa! Priority projects cannot be modified, Changes in quantities on National Priority projects must have FEMA approval.

3. Procurement: General procurement standards with open competition must be followed for all federal grant expenditures, according to 2 C.F.R. S 200.318-200.323. Copies of three (3) quotes/bids must be submitted with reimbursement requests.

4. Noncompetitive Procurement: Documentation of entity procurement policies must be submitted with reimbursement requests for all noncompetitive procurement. Purchases over $250,000 will require pre-approval from Cal OES prior to procurement, following up with your governing board or council, if applicable. A cost benefit analysis is required with noncompetitive procurement requests.

Cot.. Plul Cor>x (Rrr'n)
l'ice Chairrnan, First District
I r.ss t' Anu l:i-,r r)ARl:z
Secrurd l)istrict
DetvN Rown
(.hair,'lhir.l l)lrtrict
Iot: Bnc:,r, f n
Fifth [)istrict
Ct-:H't' H.,\(ilrlAN
Fourth l)istrict 7603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

FY2022 HSGP Authorization to Spend
December 12,2023
PAGE2 of 2

5. SAMS Verification: A print-out of the SAM.gov vendor verification report must be printed prior to procurement for all vendor/contractors and must be submitted with reimbursement requests. Note: Vendor registration in SAM.gov is not required. However, the vendor must not be debarred or restricted from receiving federal funds, which will appear in your vendor verification report if the vendor has restrictions.

6. Performance Bond: A performance bond is required for any equipment item over $250,000, gI any vehicle, aviation, or watercraft, regardless of the cost.

7. Audit Requirements: This subaward is subject to all provisions of 2 C.F.R Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements. Any funds received in excess of cunent needs, approved amounts, or those found owed as a result of a final review or audit, must be refunded to the State within 30 days upon receipt of an invoice.

Refer to the grant guides for additional procedures and requirements. lf you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Grant's Unit at (909) 356-2565.

Sincerely
DANIEL MUNOZ, Deputy Executive Officer
San Bernardino County
Office of Emergency Services
DM/ts
Attachments
E
7703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Agenda Item No

CITY OF YUCAIPA

AGENDA REPORT
TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:Joe Pradetto, Director of Governmental Affairs
Phil White, Director of Finance
FOR:City Council Meeting of March 11,2024
SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution Opposing Initiative No. 2l-0042A1 and Joining the "Stop the Taxpayer Deception Act" Coalition
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-06, Opposing Initiative No. 2l-00424'1 and Joining the "Stop the Taxpayer Deception Act" Coalition.

BACKGROUND:

On Jan. 4, 2022, the Califomia Business Roundtable filed the "Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act" or AG# 2l-0042A1. On Feb. 1,2023, the measure qualified for the November 2024 ballot.

The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act would change the California Constitution to expand the definition of a tax, increase thresholds for approving a new tax, and require fees to reflect actual costs and restrict the costs to "the minimum amount necessary." According to the nonpartisan and independent Legislative Anaylst's Office (LAO), the measure would add administrative costs and burdens to the process of adopting user fees and open local fees and taxes to legal challenge, creating difficult and uncertain operating conditions. The LAO concluded the measure would have the following major fiscal effect: "Lower annual state and local revenues, potentially substantially lower, depending on future actions of the Legislature, local governing bodies, voters, and the courts."
Reductions on local goveffrment tax revenues have impacts on core services and infrastructure, including fire and emergency response, law enforcement, streets and roads, drinking water, sewer sanitation, parks, libraries, affordable housing, homelessness prevention, and mental health services.

The League of Califomia Cities, along with a broad coalition of local goverrrments, labor and public safety leaders, infrastructure advocates, and businesses, strongly opposes this initiative.

Local goverrrment revenue-raising authority is already restricted by state statute and constitutional provisions, including the voter approved provisions of Proposition l3 of 1978, Proposition 218 of 12 7803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

1996, and Proposition 26 of 2010. The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act adds and expands restrictions on voters and local government tax and fee authority.

Major Provisions
Fees and Charges
Except for licensing and other regulatory fees, fees and charges may not exceed the "actual cost" of providing the product or service for which the fee is charged. "Actual cost" is the "minimum amount necessary." The burden to prove the fee or charge does not exceed "actual cost" is changed to "clear and convincing" evidence.

Requires fees and charges paid for the use of local and state goveffrment property and the amount paid to purchase or rent govemment property to be "reasonable." These fees and charges are currently allowed to be market-based. Whether the amount is "reasonable" (introducing a new legal standard aiming to force below market fee and charge amounts) must be proved by "clear and convincing evidence." The standard may significantly reduce the amount large companies (e.g., oil, utilities, gas, railroads, garbage/refuse, cable, and other corporations) will pay for the use of local public property.

Prohibits fees on new development based on vehicle miles traveled.

Taxes
o Taxes and fees adopted after Jan. 1,2022, that do not comply with the new rules, are void unless reenacted.
o Invalidates Upland decision that allows a majority of local voters to pass special taxes. The measure specifies that taxes proposed by the initiative are subject to the same rules as taxes placed on the ballot by a city council.
o Expressly prohibits local advisory measures which allow local voters to express a preference for how local general tax dollars should be spent. . Requires voter approval to expand existing taxes (e.g., Utility, Transient Occupancy) to new territory (e.9., annexations) or to expand the tax base (e.g., new utility service) o New taxes can only be imposed for a specific time period. . City charters may not be amended to include a tax or fee. o All state taxes require majority voter approval.

Fines and Penalties
May require voter approval of fines, penalties, and levies for corporations and property owners that violate state and local laws unless a new, undefined adjudicatory process is used to impose the fines and penalties.
o
o
7903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

DISCUSSION:

Fees and Taxes
Taxes and fees differ in their application and intent. Taxes include charges that pay for services of general benefit. There does not need to be a relationship between the tax paid and the benefit provided. Fees, however, are charges applied to and intended to pay for a specific benefit or service. Fees must reflect the reasonable cost of providing the benefit or service.

Local governments levy a variety of fees to provide public services. Local goveming bodies may adopt new fees or revise existing ones with a majority vote. Common fees include:
. Building permits and planning fees.
. Nuisance abatement charges, such as for weed, rubbish, and general nuisance abatement to fund community safety, code enforcement, and neighborhood cleanup programs. . Commercial franchise fees.
. Emergency response fees.
. Document processing and duplication fees.
. Transit fees, tolls, parking fees.
. Facility use charges, fees for parks and recreation services.

Virtually every city, county, and special district must regularly (e.9., annually) adopt increases to fee rates and revise rate schedules to accommodate new users and activities. Most of these would be subject to new standards and limitations under threat of legal challenge. Based on the current volume of fees and charges imposed by local agencies, including council-adopted increases to simply accommodate inflation, Cal Cities estimates the amount of local government fee and charge revenue at risk is approximately $2 billion per year including those adopted since Jan. I ,2022.

Over ten years, $20 billion of local government fee and charge revenues will be at heightened legal peril.

Hundreds of local tax measures were approved in 2022 that likely do not comply with the provisions of the initiative. Nearly $2 billion of annual revenues from these voter-approved measures will cease ayear after the effective date of the measure, reducing the local public services funded by these measures, unless the tax is re-submitted for voter approval.

Adding the words "the mimumum amount necessary" to the requirement that fees reflect the actual cost of providing a service presents more challenges. "The mimumum amount necessary" is subjective. If a city determines to offer a higher level of service of any kind, it could be sued because the service exceeds "the minimum amount necessary." This would have a profound impact to the way services are provided and financed.

Impact on City
As the City looks to correct and recover from a structural deficit, one of the key strategies is pursuing full cost recovery. Staff have been engaged in fee studies to ensure our fees capture all associated costs for specific services that provide limited or no direct benefit to the community as 8003/11/2024 City Council Agenda

a whole. This measure would significantly impair this effort. Additionally, if the City decides to pursue new revenue to protect critical services, like police and fire protection or emergency medical services, the thresholds would be nearly insurmountable. This measure poses an existential threat to the City's ability to fix its structural budget deficit.

Fines and Penalties
Under existing law, cities are required to provide due process before imposing a penalty or fine for violation of its municipal code:
l. A local agency must adopt administrative procedures that govern imposing fines and penalties, including providing a reasonable period of time for a person responsible for a continuing violation to correct or remedy the violation [Gov't Code 53069.4].

2. Notice must be given to the violating party before imposing the penalty; and give the party an opportunity to be heard and present any facts or arguments lMerco Construction Engineers v. Los Angeles Unified School District (1969) 274 CA2d 154, 1661.

3. The fine may not be "excessive" [U.S. Constitution amendments VIII and XIV].

The initiative converts administratively-imposed fines and penalties into taxes unless a new, undefined, and ambiguous "adjudicatory due process" is followed. This provision may put at risk authority to impose fines and penalties for violations of state and local law.

The City has several fines and penalties that may be impacted by this measure. These include Code Enforcement citations used to protect the quality of our neighborhoods, structures and fines for repeated false alarms that draw on limited police resources, and parking citations.

Conclusion
If passed, the Taxpayer Protection and Govemment Accountability Act will have a high cost of compliance and uncertain legal future that will create burdensome regulatory hoops that increase the cost of doing business. It will eliminate many of the options available to the City to fix its structural deficit without impacting services to our residents and tax payers.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Taxpayer Protection and Govemment Accountability Act will change the model to support fees. The City's General Fund receives approximately $1.3 million in revenues from fees, permits, fines and penalties. The revenue is anticipated to remain intact; however, the costs associated with defending the fees, permits, fines and penalties is anticipated to increase significantly as a result of the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act.

Attachments:

1. Resolution No .2024-06

2. Full Text of Initiative No . 2l-0042A1
Approved By:k
8103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHMENT 1
8203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

RESOLUTION NO.2024-06

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING INITIATM #21-0042 At
WHEREAS, an association representing Califomia's largest corporations is spending tens of millions of dollars to promote a deceptive ballot measure currently eligible for the November 2024 statewide ballot; and
WHEREAS, the measure threatens billions of dollars every year in local government funding for services like fire and emergency response, law enforcement, affordable housing, services to support homeless residents, mental health services, and more; and WHEREAS, the measure would make it more difficult for local voters to pass measures to fund services and prevents voters from passing advisory measures that provide direction on how they want their local tax dollars spent; and
WHEREAS, the measure contains intentionally restrictive language that will encourage hundreds of frivolous lawsuits against cities and local governments - costing taxpayers many millions and stopping investments in vital local services; and WHEREAS, the measure would make it much more difficult for state and local regulators to issue fines and levies on corporations that violate laws intended to protect our environment, public health and saf'ety, and our neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, the measure is opposed by hundreds of local governments, teachers, firefighters, working families and local elected officials.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section I The City of Yucaipa opposes Initiative #21-0042a1 (Taxpayer Protection and Govemment Accountability Act).

Section 2 The City of Yucaipa joins the "Stop the Taxpayer Deception Act" coalition to protect public safety and local goverrrment services.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this I lth day of March, 2024.

Justin Beaver, Mayor
ATTEST
Ana V. Sauseda, CMC
Director of General Services/City Clerk
8303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHMENT 2
8403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

BELL, MCANDREWS & ETILTACIIIT, LLP

ATTORNEYS ANO COUNSELOFIS AT LAVY
455 CAPTTOL MALL, SL.lITE CIOO
SACFIAMENTO. CALITOFIN IA €)5814
(916' 14-?-7757
FAX (916) 442-775E
rn*w.bmhlew.com
21 oo4z Amcrt
]anuary 4,2022 RE,CE,tVED
Anabel Renteria
Initiative Coordinator
Office of the Attorney General
State of California
PO Box 994?55
Sacramento, CA 9424+25550
JAN 0 't 20U

IMTIA ITVTE COORDTNATOR

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Re: Initiative 2].0042- Amendrnent Number One
Dear Initiative Coordinator:

Fursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 9002of the Elections Code, enclosed please find Amendment #7 to Initiative No. 27-W2 "The Taxpayer Protection and Govemment Accountability Act." The amendments are reasonably gerrnane to the themg purpose or subiect of the initiative me.rsure as originally proposed.

I am the proponent of the measure and request that the Attorney General prepare a circulating title and summary of the measure as provided by law, using the amended language.

Thank you for your time and attention Processing my request.

Thomas \,V. Hiltachk
8503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

21-oo42Amdt.#l
The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act [Deleted codified text is denoted in strikeet*. Added codified text is denoted by italics ond qlderline.l Section 1. Title
This Act shall be known, and may be cited as, the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act.

Section 2. Findings and Declarations
(a) Californians are overtaxed. We pay the nation's highest state income tax, sales tax, and gasoline tax. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, California's combined state and localtax burden is the highest in the nation. Despite this, and despite two consecutive years of obscene revenue surpluses, state politicians in 2021 alone introduced legislation to raise more than 5234 billion in new and higher taxes and fees.
(b) Taxes are only part of the reason for California's rising cost-of-living crisis. Californians pay billions rnore in hidden "fees" passed through to consumers in the price they pay for products, services, food, fuel, utilities and housing. Since 2O10, government revenue from state and local "fees" has more than doubled.
(c) California's high cost of living not only con$ibutes to the state's skyrocketing rates of poverty and homelessness, they are the pushing working families and job-providing businesses out of the state. The most recent Census showed that California's population dropped for the first time in history, costing us a seat in Congress. ln the past four years, nearly 300 major corporations relocated to other states, not counting thousands more smal! businesses that were forced to move, sell or close. (d) California voters have tried repeatedly, at Breat expense, to assert control over whether and how taxes and fees are raised. We have enacted a series of measures to make taxes more predictable, to limit what passes as a "fee," to require voter approval, and to guarantee transparency and accountability. These measures include Proposation 13 (19781, Proposition 52 (1986), Proposition 218 (1995), and Proposition 26 (2010).
(e) Contrary to the voters' intent, these measures that were designed to control taxes, spending and accountability, have been weakened and hamstrung by the Legislature, Bovemment lawyers, and the courts, making it necessary to pass yet another initiative to close loopholes and reverse hostile court decisions.

Section 3. Statement of Purpose
(a) ln enacting this measure, the voters reassert their right to a voice and a vote on new and higher taxes by requiring any new or higher tax to be put before voters for approval. Voters also intend that all fees and other charges are passed or rejected by the voters themselves or a governing body elected by voters and not unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats.
(b) Furthermore, the purpose and intent of the voters in enacting this measure is to increase transparency and accountabitity over higher taxes and charges by requiring any tax measure placed on the ballot- 1 8603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

either at the state or local level-to clearly state the type and rate of any tax, how long it will be in effect, and the use ofthe revenue generated by the tax.
(c) Furthermore, the purpose and intent of the voters in enacting this measure is to clariff that any new or increased form of state government revenue, by any name or manner of extraction paid directly or indirectly by Californians, shall be authorized only by a vote of the Legislature and signature of the Governorto ensure that the purposes for such charges are broadly supported and transparently debated. (d) Furthermore, the purpose and intent of the voters in enacting this measure is also to ensure that taxpayers have the right and ability to effectively balance new or increased taxes and other charges with the rapidly increasing costs Californians are already paying for housing food, childcare, gasoline, energy, heahhcare, education, and other basic costs of living, and to further protect the existing constitutional limit on property taxes and ensure that the revenue from such taxes remains loca!, without changing or superseding existing constitutional provisions contained in Section 1(c) of Article Xlll A. (e) ln enacting this measure, the voters also additionally intend to reverse loopholes in the legislative two- thirds vote and voter approval requirements for government revenue increases created by the courts including, but not limited to, Connobis Coalition v. City of Upland, Chomber of Commerce v. Air Resources Boord, Schmeer v. Los Angeles County, lohnson v. County of Mendocino, Citizens Assn. of Sunset Beoch v.

Oronge County Local Agency Formation Commission, and Wilde v. City of Dunsmuir.

Section 4. Section 3 of Article XlllA of the California Constitution is amended to read:

Sec.3fu) Everv levy. chorge. or exoction of any kind imoosed bv stote low is either o tax or on exempt choroe.
btfil 14 Any change in state stat{rt€ /ow which results in any taxpayer paying a new or higher tax must be imposed by an act passed by not less than two-thirds of all memberc elected to each of the two houses of the Legislature, ond submitted to the eledorate oqd oooroved bv o maioriltlote except that no new ad valorem taxes on real property, or sales or transaction taxes on the sales of real property, may be imposed. Each Act shall include:
lAl A specilic durotion oI time thot the tax will bg.imoosed ond on estimote of the annual omount exoected to be defived from the tox.

B) A soecific ond leaollv bindina ond enforceoble limitotion on how the revenue from the tax con be soent. tf the revenue from the tox con be soent for unrestricted aenerol revenue purposes. then a statement thot the tan revenue can be spent for "unrestricted oenerol revenue ourposes" shall be included in o seporote. stand-olone section. Anv orooosed chonoe tothe use of the revenue from the tox sholl be odooted bv o seoorote oct thot is oassed bv not less tbon two-thirds of oll qembers elected to-egch of th-e two houses of the Ledisloture ond submitted to the electorote ond ooproved bv o maioritv vote. (21 The title ond summary and bollot label or ouestion reauired for o meosure oursuont to the Elections Code shall. for eoch meosure oroviding for the imoosition of o tox. includino o meosure proposed bv on elector oursuont to Article ll. include:
(Al The tvoe ond_qqount or rote of the tox:
(91 The durotion of the tax; ond
2 8703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Et The use.gtfthe revenue derived from the tox...
kl Anv chanoe in stote low which resulF in ony toxoayer oovina o new or hioher exempt chg!'ge must be imoosed bv on oct oossed by-e-ach of the two houses of the Leoisloture. Each od sholl soecilv the tvoe of exemot choroe os provided in subdivision bl ond the amount or rote of the exemot choroe to be imoosed, ldl$)As used in this section ond in Section 9 of Article I. "tat'' means everv a#l levy, charge, or exaction of any kind imposed by the5tate stote low thot is not oeexeppt choroe. e*cept{h€{elleurine kl As used in this section, "exe-mgt charge" means onlv the followino:
the benefit er grantinG the privilege te the Fayer,
A)+2+ A reosonoble charge impeseC for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the rees€nable octuol costs to the State of providing the service or product to the payor.

IAP+ A charge imBese*'for the reasonable regulatory costs to the State incident to issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the ad m in istrative enforcement a nd adjudication thereof.

Bl A lew. choroe. or exodion collected from locol units oJ aovernment heolth core providers or heolth core seruice olans thot is orimorilv used bv the State of Colifornio for the Lurooses of inueasing reimbursement rotes or oavments under the Medi-Cal orogrom and the revenues of which ore orimorilv used to finance the non-federol oortion of Medi-Col medical assistonce expenditures- (41 A reosonoble charge impesed for entrance to or use of state property, or the purchase, rental, or lease of state property, except charges governed by Section 15 of Artacle Xl. (5) A finq or penalty, @ includina onv aoolicoble interestfor nonoovmentthereof. imposedbythejudicialbranchofgovernmentorMostoteodministrative enforcement ooencv oursuont to odiudicotorv due orocess. to ouni$h a violation of law. (61 A lew. charoe. ossessment. or exoction coll.ected for the oromotion of Colifornio tourism ourcuant to Chaoter 1 (commencine with Sestion 139951 of Part 4.7 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. /fl{4 Any tax or exemo! charge adopted after January l, 2022 ?ol{t, but prior to the effective date of thls act, that was not adopted in compliance with the requirements of this section is void 12 months after the effectivedateofthisactunlessthetaxorexemotchareeisreenacted taurbY{he€errer+e+ in compliance with the requirements of this section. @@(d|TheStatebearstheburdenofprovingby@cleardndconvincinaevidence that a levy, charge, or other exaction is on exemot choroe and not a tar- The State beors the bur provino bv cleor ond convincina evidence thot the amount of the exemot choroe is reosonoble ond thol the omount choroed does not exceed the actual cost of orovidino the service or product to the o.gyor. ,{he* the ameunt is ne mere than neeessary te €ever the reas€nable eests ef the gevernmental aetiviU and 3 8803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

that the manner in whieh these eests are alleeated te a Bayer bear a fair er reasenable relatienshiB te the Baye/s burCen+et er b
Ql The retention of revenue bv&r the povmentto d non-oovernmentolentity of.q levy- choroe. or exodion of onv kind imoosed bv stqte law, sholl not be a loctor in determininq whether the lew- choroe. or exoction is o tox or exemot choroe.

Bl The choroderizotion of o lew. choroe. or exodion ol ony kind as beina voluntorv- or ooid in exchonge for o benefit, orivileoe. ollowance. outhorizotion. or asset sholl not be o foctor in determining whether the lew. chorae. or exaction is o tax or an exemot choroe.
l4J The use of revenue derived frorn the lew. choroe or exoction sholl be a foctor in determinino whether the lew, chorae. or exaction is o tox or exemot chorae. lhl As used in this seqion:
fi) "Actuol cost" of providino o xrvice or orodud.meons: fil the minimum omount necessaru to reimburse the oovernment for the cost of orovidino the service or orodud to the oovor ond liil where the omount charoed ls not used bv the oovernment for onv ouroose other thon reimburcino thot cost. ln computino "octuol cos( the moximum o?nountthat mavbe imoosed isthe oduolcost less allothersources of revenue includino. but not limited to toxes. other exemot choroes- gronts, and stote or federol funds received to provide such seruice or produ4.
l2l "Wnd". includes but is not limited to- doing ony of the followina with resoed to o tax or exemot choroe: lenothenino its durotion. delovino or elir?inoting its exoirotion. exoandino its ooolication to a new territaru or closs of oovor, or expdndino the bose to which its rote is opolied. l3l "lmoose" meons odoot. enoct- reenoct- creote. estoUish. @llect. increose or extend. (4) "Stote lo$/' includes. but is not limited to. anv state stotute. stfre,regulotion. stote executive order. stote lesolution. stote rulino- stote ooinion letter, or other leoal authoriil or interlretotion odopted. enocted, enforceil issued or imolemented bv the leaislotive or executive branches of stote oovernment. "Stote lqw" Coes not include octions token bLthe Regents of the Univergrty of eofifornia. Trustees of the Californio Stote Univercitv or the Boord of Gousrnors of the Colifornio Communittt Colleoes.

Section 5. Section 1 of Article Xlll C of the California Constitution is amended, to read:

Sec. 1. Definitions. As used in this article:
(gl "Actual cost" of oroviding o service or oroduct meon,: lil the minimum omount necessorv to reimburse the aovernment for the cost of orovidino the service or prodJtgt to the oavor. ond (iil where the omount choroed is not u\ed by the aovernment for onv purpose other than reimbursingthot cost. ln comoutino "octuol cos( the moximum amount that mav be imoosed is the actuol cost less all other sources of revenue includino. but not limited to toxes. other exemot choroes. orontl. and stote or federol funds received to orovide s.uch service or produd.
h) "Extend" includes. but is not limitedto. doino onv of the followino with resoectto o tox. exemptchorqe. or ArtigLe Xlll D ossessment. fee. or charoe: lenothenino its durotion delovina or eliminotina its exoirotion^ exoondino its aoplicotion to o new territorv or closs of povo!. or exoondino the bose to which its rote is opolied.
4 8903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

/gl{a) "General taf' means any tax imposed for general governmental purposes. (dl'lmoose" means odoot. enod reenoct- creote. establish. collect. increose. or-extend.

GL$) "Local government'' means any county, city, city and county, including a charter city or county, any special district, or any other local or regional governmental enlitv, or on elector oursuont t the initiotive power provided bv a chorter or stotute.
(fl "Local ldw" includes. but isltot limited to onv ordinonce resolution reaulotion. rulino. ooinion letter or other leoolouthoriw or interpretotion adopted. enocted. enforced, issued or implemented bv a locol oovemment..
tgl(el "special district" means an agency of the State, formed pursuant to general law or a special act, for the local performance of governmental or proprietary functions with limited geographic boundaries including, but not limited to, school districts and redevelopment agencies.

InLl*l "Special tat'' means any tax imposed for specific purposes, including a tax imposed for specific purposes, which is placed into a generalfund.
tl {$ As used in this article, gnd in Section 9 of Article ll- "tax" means every aaylery, charge, or exaction of any kind, imposed by a local 6everement low thot's not on exemot ghgrge.ffi (il As used in this section. "exemot choroe" meons onlv the followino:
@$ A reosonoble charge impes€d for a specific loc_ol government service or product provided directly to the payorthat is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasenable octuol costs to the local government of providing the service or product.

Q)Pl Acharge imBeseC for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof. (!)14] A reosonoble charge impesed for entrance to or use of local government property, or the purchase, rental, or lease of local governrnent property.
tA lS+ A finq or penalty, @ includino onv opolicable interest for nonoovment thereof. imposed by the judicial branch of government or a local government odministotive enforcement ogencv oursuont to odjudicatorv due orocess- ase+esslt-ef to ounish a violation of law.

E)$l A charge imposed as a condition of property developmenl. No lew, cttgrge, or exoction reoulotino or reloted to vehicle miles traveled mov bg-imoosed os o condition of oroLerty develooment or occupancv. l6lF)ln qg.sessment fee. orchoroe@
tne++evisiense+ subiectto Article XttI O, or an ossessment im !lg. distict. g.pgrkina and business imorovement areo. or a propertv and business imorovement distrid.

I
5 9003/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Ol A choroe imoosed for o soecific heolth core seruice orovided directlv to tbe povor and thot is not. provided to-lhose not choroed. ond which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the locgl qovernment of orovidino the heolth core service, -As,gtg-d in th.is poroaraph. o "heofth care service' means o seruice licensed or exemotfrom lice?sure bv the stote pursuontto Chooters 7. 7.3. or 2 of Division 2 of the Heolth ond Sofetv Code.

The leeal Bevernment bearc the burden ef previn8 by a prepenCeranee ef the evidenee that a lew ehargei ir-er
reasenable relatienship te the paye/s burdens enr er benefits reeeiveC ftem; the Eevernmentalaetivity, Section 5. Section 2 of Article Xlll C of the California Constitution is amended to read:

Sec. 2. Loca! Government Tax Limitation. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Constitution:
(al Everv lew. choroe. or exoction of onv kind imposedbv local low is either a tax or on exempt choroe. All taxesimposed byany localgovernment shall be deemed to be eithergeneraltaxes or specialtaxes. Special purpose districts or agencies, including school distracts, shall have no power to levy general taxes. (b) No local low may impose,
extend, or increase any general tax unless and until that tax is submitted to the electorate and approved by a majority vote. A general tax shall not be deemed to have been increased if it is imposed at a rate not higher than the maximum rate so approved. The election required by this subdivision shall be consolidated with a regularly scheduled general election for members of the governing body of the local government, except in cases of emergency declared by a unanimous vote of the governing body. (c)
su$ivisi€n{+{d} No local lout
mayirnposffianyspecialtaxunlessanduntilthattaxissubmittedtotheelectorate and approved by a two-thirds vote. A special tax shall not be deemed to have been increased if it is imposed at a rate not higher than the maximum rate so approved. ldl The title ond. sumnaru ond bollot label or ouestion reguired for o measure oursuont to the Elections Code sholl. for eoch measure orovidino forthe imoosition of g-tax. include:
fil The tuoe and omount.gr rote of the tox:
2l the duration of the tax: and
(31The use of the revenue derived from the tox. lf the oroposed tax is o oeneraltox. the phrose 'for genefol oovernment use" shall Erequired. ond no odvisorv megsure noy oooear on the some ballot thot would indicate that the revenue from the aenerol tax will. could. or should be used for o soecific ouroose. bl Onlv the oovernino bodv of o local oovernment other than on elector ounuont to Article Il or the initiotive oower orovided bv o chorter or stotute, sholl hove the outhoritv to imoose onv exemot choroe.

The aovernino bodv sholl imoose an e$p.mg!choroe bv on ordinance soecifuina the tvpe of exemot choroe 6 9103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

os ofovided in Section 7(il ond the omount or rote of the exemot chorae to be imoosed. ond oossed by the aovernino bodv. ThLs subdivision shall not applv to chorges specified in ooroorooh l7l of subdivision (il of Section 7.
ffl No amendment to a Charter which orovides for the imoosition extension. or increose ol o tox or exemot charae sholl be submitted to or ooproved bv the electorc. nor shall dnv such omendment to o Chorter hereofter submitted to or oporoved bv the electors becomq efrgctive for anv ouroue. bl Anv tox or exempt choroe odooted ofter Joqlgry 7. 2022 but orior to the effective dote-gf this oct. thot wos not odooted in compliance with the reouirgmelts of this section is void 72 months ofielthe effective date of this oct unless the tax or exemot chorae is reengcted in comolionce with the reouirements of this section.
lhlfit The locol oovernment beorc the burden of orovino bv clear ond Sonvincina evidence thot o lew. choroe or exoction is on exemot choroe ond not a tox. The locol oovernment bearc the burden of provino bv cleor and convincina evidence,that the omount of the exemot choroe is reosonoble ond thot the omount choroed does not exceed the odud!_cost of providino the service or oroduct to the oavor. (21 The retention of revenue bv. or the oavment to. o non-agvernmeFtgl entittt of o lew. choroe. or exoction of onv kind imoosed bv a locol law. sholl not be o foctor in determinino whether the lew, charoe or exoction is a-tox or exempt chorue:
[3] The chorocterizotion of o lew. gharge or exoction of onv kind imoosed bv a locol low os beino oaid in exchonoe for o benefit. orivileoe allowonce oulhorization. or osset. sholl not be foctofs _in determinino whether the lew, charae or exoction is a tox or on exemot choroe. (4| The use of revenue derived flgm the lew. choroe or exoction sholl be o foctor in determinino Whether the lew. chorae. or exoction is a tox or exemot choroe.

Section 7. Section 3 of Arficle Xll! D of the California Constitution is amended, to read:

Sec. 3. Property Taxes, Assessments, Fees and Charges Limited (a) No tax, assessment, fee, eJcharte, or surchorge, ind shall be assessed @yragenq upon any parcel of property or upon any person as an incident of property ownership except:
(1)The ad valorem propefi tax impesedprreuan*-te described in Section 7fu) of Article Xlll and SeAion 7bl of Article Xlll A, ond described ond enoaed pursuant to the voter aoproval reouirement in Section 7(b) glArticle XlllA.
(2)Any special non-od volorem tax receiving a two-thirds vote of ouolified eledors pursuant to Section 4 of Article Xlll
district bv the Leoislature ourcuont to stotute os it existed on December 37. 2027. (3) Assessments as provided by this article.
(4) Fees or charges for propefi related services as provided by this article. 7 9203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

(b)For purposes of this article, fees for the provision of electrical or gas service shall not be deemed charges or fees imposed as an incident of property ownership.

Section 8. Sections l and 14 of Article XIll are arnended to read:

Sec. 1 Unless othenrise provided by this Constitution or the laws of the United States:
(a) All property is taxable and shall be assessed at the same percentage of fair market value. When a value standard other than fair market value is prescribed by this Constitution or by statute authorized by this Constitution, the same percentage shall be applied to determine the assessed value. The value to which the percentage is applied, whether it be the fair market value or not, shall be known for property tax purposes as the fullvalue.
(b) All property so assessed shall be taxed in proportion to its full value. kl All oroceeds fp-A the taxation of orooerttr sholl be oooortioned occordino to low to the districts within the counties.

Sec. 14. All property taxed by stgte or local government shall be assessed in the county, city, and district in which it is situated . Notwithstondina onv other provi,ion of low. such stote or lgcal orooertv taxes shall be oooortioned occordino to lqw to the districts within the counties.

Section 9. GeneralProvisions
A. This Act shall be liberally construed in order to effectuate its purposes.

B. (1) ln the event that this initiative measure and another initiative measure or measures relating to state or local requirements for the imposition, adoption, creation, or establishment of taxes, charges, and other revenue measures shall appear on the same statewide election ballot, the other initiative measure or rneasures shall be deemed to be in conflict with this measure. ln the event that this initiative measure receives a greater number of affirmative votes, the provisions of this measure shall prevail in their entirety, and the provisions of the other initiative measure or measures shall be null and void. (2) ln furtherance of this provision, the voters hereby declare that this measure conflicts with the provisions of the "Housing Affordability and Tax Cut Act of 2022" and "The Tax Cut and Housing Affordability Act," both of which would impose a new state property tax (called a "surcharge") on certain real property, and where the revenue derived from the tax is provided to the State, rather than retained in the county in which the property is situated and for the use of the county and cities and districts within the county, in direct violation of the provisions of this initiative. (3) !f this initiative measure is approved by the voters, but superseded in whole or in part by any other conflicting initiative measure approved by the voters at the same election, and such conflicting initiative is later held invalid, this measure shall be self-executing and given full force and effect.

C. The provisions of this Act are severable. lf any portion, section, subdivision, paragraph, clause, sentence, phrase, word, or application of this Act is for any reason held to be invalid by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portaons of this Act. The People of the State of California hereby declare that they would have adopted this Act and each and every portion, section, subdivision, paragraph, clause, sentence, phrase, word, and application not 8 9303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of this Act or application thereof would be subsequently declared invalid.

D. lf this Act is approved by the voters of the State of California and thereafter subjected to a legal challenge alleging a violation of state or federal law, and both the Governor and Attorney General refuse to defend this Act, then the following actions shall be taken:
(U Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Chapter 6 of Part 2 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code or any other law, the Attorney General shallappoint independent counsel to hithfully and vigorously defend this Act on behalf of the State of California. (2) Before appointing or thereafter substituting independent counsel, the Attorney General shall exercise due diligence in deterrnining the qualifications of independent counsel and shall obtain written affrmation from independent counselthat independent counsel willfaithfully and vigorously defend this Act. The written affirmation shall be made publicly available upon request. (3)A continuous appropriation is hereby made from the General Fund to the Controller, without regard to fiscalyears, in an amount necessary to cover the costs of retaining independent counselto faithfully and vigorously defend this Act on behalf of the State of California. (4) Nothing in this section shall prohibit the proponents of this Act, or a bona fide taxpayers association, from intervening to defend this Act.
9 9403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Agenda Item No._

CITY OF YUCAIPA

AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Fermin Preciado, Director of Development ServiceVCity Engineer LY For (7 Landon Kern, Assistant City Engineer /-K
Katrina Kunkel, Associate Engineer g\l
FOR: City Council Meeting of March 11,2024
SUBJECT: Wildwood Canyon Road Engineering Study and Traffic Analysis RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council receive an update regarding a traffic analysis completed along Wildwood Canyon Road and provide direction to staff regarding optional traffic improvements.

BAC KG ROUND/DISC U SSION :

In Spring 2023, staff was directed by the City Council to complete a traffic analysis for the intersection of Wildwood Canyon Road and Canyon Drive, including the pedestrian crosswalk.

The direction was in response to multiple citizen concerns that were shared during public comment at the City Council meetings following a fatal accident involving a cyclist at a location near the intersection located at Wildwood Canyon Road and Canyon Drive. Following the initiation of the traffic analysis with the City's on-call traffic engineer, staff coordinated with the citizens directly to gain a better understanding of their concems. At that time, staff was introduced to representatives from the Wildwood Watcher Fire Safe Council (WWFSC). WWFSC consists of a non-profit organization coordinated by a group of residents that live in the area north of Wildwood Canyon Road between Mesa Grande Drive and Oak Glen Road. The non-profit group was formed as a means of reducing fire risk in their area through grant applications for hazard fuel mitigation and resource management projects. WWFSC has expanded their scope to include advocacy for any observed safety concerns in the area. WWFSC shared their traffic concerns with staff, including the crosswalk/trail crossing at Wildwood Canyon Road the intersection of Wildwood Canyon Road and Oak View Road, and speeding along Wildwood Canyon Road.

The traffic analysis includes a Traffic Control Device Warrants Analysis for the intersection of Wildwood Canyon Road and Canyon Drive, a Focused Intersection Evaluation for the intersection of Wildwood Canyon Road at Oak View Road, and an Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits along Wildwood Canyon Road from Mesa Grande Drive to Oak Glen Road. Staff has met with the representatives of WWFSC throughout the process to maintain a collaborative approach. 13 9503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Canyon Drive Pedestriar/Trail Crossing Intersection Evaluation The analysis at Wildwood Canyon Road and Canyon Drive (trail crossing analysis) includes a traffic signal warrant analysis report, a multiway stop sign analysis, an in-roadway warning light system analysis and a flashing beacon analysis to determine if these traffic control devices are warranted for the intersection. The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices requires warrant analysis be completed and certain metrics be met in order install traffic control devices.

These metrics include quantifiable items such as traffic volumes, pedestrian volumes, accident occurrence and roadway geometry. Typically, data is collected during peak weekday hour traffic (generally 7am-9am and 4pm-7pm). However, due to the unique nature of the intersection, data for the analyses was also collected on a Saturday when pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian activity was anticipated to be at peak volumes. The volume of traffic on the minor street of an intersection (in this case Canyon Drive) plays a significant role in determining if a control device is warranted.

The trail crossing analysis was finalized in January 2024 and the results were reviewed by staff.

The trail crossing analysis determined that a traffic signal, multi-way stop signs, and in-roadway waming lights devices are not warranted at this time. The trail crossing analysis also includes a field review for sight distance visibility and intersection lighting, which were both found to be adequate and meet industry standards. Although a traffic signal, stop signs and in-roadway warning lights were not warranted, the analysis did provide some optional recommendations that the City Council could choose to implement, including the following items:
l. Re-paint white ladder style marked crosswalks at the intersection due to fading.

2. Install advance Yield lines and Yield Here to Pedestrian signs.

3. Install a solar-powered Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) system at the marked crosswalk.

The FY23l24Pavement Striping Program is currently out for bid. Staff has integrated the proposed recommendations for striping (items I & 2) into the bid package for installation. The optional RRFB (item 3) includes push-button pedestrian activated flashing beacons, which could be installed at either side of the crosswalk. The estimated cost for an RRFB is $40,000. Should the City Council elect to pursue these improvements, staff can integrate them into the upcoming Fiscal Y ear 2024-25 (FY25) Budget.

Oak View Road Intersection Evaluation
The analysis at Wildwood Canyon Road and Oak View Road includes an evaluation of the intersection from a traffic engineering perspective, including roadway geometry, signing & striping and sight distance. Results for the Intersection Evaluation at Wildwood Canyon Road and Oak View Road determined that the existing roadway geometry is adequate, meets industry standards, and there are no required improvements. However, the City Council may consider the following optional recommendations:
l. Refresh the existing signing and striping atlnear the intersection.

2. Add Side-Street Ahead warning signs on Wildwood Canyon Road in advance of the intersection.

3. Add double-yellow striping to create a "median" at the intersection. 9603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

4. Add a double-arrow end-of-roadway warning sign on the south side of Wildwood Canyon Road, facing southbound Oak View Road traffic.

5. Restrict on-street parking along the north side of Wildwood Canyon Road and along both sides of Oak View Road for 20 to 40 feet from the intersection.

6. Add double-yellow centerline along Oak View Road the intersection of Wildwood Canyon Road.

7. As part of a larger roadway project for Wildwood Canyon Road, when the City has acquired additional right-of-way and constructed Wildwood Canyon Road to its ultimate condition, the City may consider restriping the left-turn pocket to allow for the storage of two cars or more to allow for deceleration to occur in the left-turn pocket.

Staff has integrated the proposed recommendations that can be implemented with existing roadway conditions for striping (items I through 6) into the FY23l24 Pavement Striping Program bid package. The estimated cost to acquire right-of-way and construct roadway improvements along Wildwood Canyon Road (item 7) is approximately $350,000. Should the City Council elect to pursue these improvements, staff can integrate them into the upcoming FY25 Budget.

Wildwood Can)ron Road Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
The speed survey for Wildwood Canyon Road from Mesa Grande Drive to Oak Glen Road was conducted to determine if the posted speed limit of 45 mph should remain. The speed survey, as required by the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the Califomia Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), collects and analyzes data associated with prevailing speeds, accident records, and highway, traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Results from the study determined that the posted 45 mph speed limit should remain.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The recommended action does not result in a fiscal impact. Should the City Council direct staff to complete any of the additional optional traffic improvements, staffcan integrate those improvements into the proposed FY25 Capital lmprovement Program (CIP) with the upcoming budget adoption process.

Optional improvements include any or all of the following:

Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (Canyon Drive Intersection) $40,000 Roadway Widening Improvements (Oak View Road lntersection) $350,000 Attachments:
l. Traffic Control Device Warrant Analysis for the intersection of Wildwood Canyon Road and Canyon Drive.

2. Focused lntersection Evaluation - Intersection of Wildwood Canyon Road at Oak View Road in the City of Yucaipa, CA.

3. Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Approved by:
9703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

ATTACHMENT 1
9803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE WARRANTS ANALYSIS

FOR THE INTERSECTION OF

WILDWOOD CANYON ROAD AND CANYON DRIVE
IN THE

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
JANUARY IO,2024

INTRODUCTION
The City of Yucaipa requested Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. to complete a Traffic Control Device Warrants Analysis for the intersection of Wildwood Canyon Road and Canyon Drive. This analysis was completed in order to veri$ if a traffic signal, multi-way stop sign, or other traffic control device installation is justified and recommended based on meeting standard guidelines. It is understood that pedestrians, bicycles, and horses cross Wildwood Canyon Road at this intersection from the park located on the south-side to access the horse trail located northerly along Canyon Drive, especially during the weekend. The location is a 'T'-intersection with Wildwood Canyon Road running in the east-west directions and Canyon Drive intersecting in the north-south directions (on the north side of Wildwood Canyon Road). The intersection is located northeast of lnterstate l0 San Bernardino Freeway, and east of Bryant Street (see Location Map below). The intersection lies in the southeasterly area of the City of Yucaipa, entirely within City jurisdiction. Presently, the intersection has a l-Way Stop sign installation controlling the southbound Canyon Drive approach, while Wildwood Canyon Road is uncontrolled.

Ir
1 NTS
Intersection of
Wildwood Canyon Road
&
Canyon Drive
Crafton
I
Yucarpa
rfl
te
-I
II
iI
a...eroor
ttt'..\..rar.
ta.l
,...o4't
a
a
i:s
a
toa
ttt
aaal
.aaa
i Yuearpa"o""o""' Rgqronal Pa
,.........
a
a
aaaarldloorl i
t
E! Dorado Ranch iark
Location Map
City of Yucaipa
San Bernardino County
Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page I of 2I
9903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Trallic Control Device llarrants Analysis - llildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA

BACKGROUND
Wildwood Canyon Road, from Mesa Grande Drive to Oak View Road, has a street-width of approximately (32) feet and is classified as an east-west minor arterial roadway. The rural roadway has a mix of rural and residential properties along the north side, and community park frontage on the south side. At the intersection with Canyon Drive, the 2-lane roadway provides for one ( I ) through-lane of traffic in each direction which are divided by a painted double-yellow centerline and delineated with white, right edge-line striping. Both sides of the roadway are improved with asphalt curb or berm only. There is a white ladder-style marked crosswalk across the west leg of the intersection, and applicable Pedestrian Crossing warning signs and Equestrian Crossing signs, along with advance solar-powered flashing beacons. There are no disabled access curb ramps located at any comer of the intersection with Canyon Drive. There is also a Bear Crossing posted sign, and a Wildwood Canyon State park wayfinding sign facing eastbound traffic. Wildwood Canyon Road has a posted speed limit of 45 MPH. There are no posted street-parking restrictions along either side of Wildwood Canyon Road, yet if necessary due to the narrow street width, it is likely that vehicles may park off the pavement on the south-side or within the approximate four (4) foot space between the asphalt curb and white edge-line striping.

Wildwood Park is located on the south-side of this intersection. See Exhibil I (next page) for photo imoges of lVildwood Canyon Road,
Canyon Drive, north of Wildwood Canyon Road, has a street-width of approximately (20) feet and is classified as a north-south local rural roadway. The roadway has primarily residential and rural frontage on both sides, and leads northerly to the Wildwood Canyon State Park. At the intersection with Wildwood Canyon Road, the 2-lane roadway provides for one ( I ) through-lane of traffic in each direction which are not separated by any centerline striping. Both sides of the roadway are unimproved (i.e. no curb, gutter, or sidewalk). There is a white ladder-style marked crosswalk across the north leg of the intersection. Canyon Drive does not have a posted speed limit, and is considered a local residential roadway; therefore, a prima facie speed limit for local residential streets between [5 and 25 MPH may be applicable. There is a Stop sign posted for southbound traffic. There are no street-parking restrictions along either side of Canyon Drive, yet due to the narrow street width it is likely that vehicles may park on the side of the road off the pavement, if neces sary. See Exhibit 2 (following page) for a photo image of Canyon Drive.

Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page 2 of 2I
10003/11/2024 City Council Agenda

TrafJic Control Device Waruants Analysis - Wildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA

EXHIBIT I
WILDWOOD CANYON ROAD (Looking Eastbound) AT CANYON DRIVE -J-
y-
WILDWOOD CANYON ROAD (Looking lfiestbound) AT CANYON DRM Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page 3 of 2I
wZ
E
- a.. I
--.-€----
7 I
t
o
L-l
FE--fj--'
E
t
\
)
T
I
v,a \
rlr-
U
10103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Troffic Control Device Warrants Analysis - Wildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA EXHIBIT 2
CANYON DRM (Looking Southboun{ AT WILDWOOD CANYON ROAI) ry:"
I Is-
dJlfr ''Ut'
'"*rl;l;rl'
Hartzog & Crahill, Inc.Page 4 of 2I
Er'--
l--'*,
>r-
.-.lL-
'l
rE..l'
El!
=hfl
t\-rUP
lr> ra-t
10203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Traffic Control Device ll/srrants Analysis - Wildwood Canyon Rd ot Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS
As is common practice with many municipal agencies, the City of Yucaipa has an adopted practice for using State guidelines as reference standards in order to provide uniformity and consistency in terms of traffic control. Therefore, the prevailing source that addresses these topics was used for this analysis, which is the State of California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD). The California MUTCD contains minimum guidelines regarding traffic volumes, collisions, speeds, visibility, and other criteria in order to satisfy the requirements, in this case, for the recommendation and installation of a traffic signal, multi-way stop, or other traffic control devices. HCI will begin with a traffic signal analysis, then the multi- way stop analysis, and continue with other device guidelines if warrants are not satisfied.

The traffic signal guidelines in Chapter 4C. Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies of the Caldornia MUTCD are included in Appendk A.

As stated in these Califomia MUTCD guidelines, as well as noted below, signalization should be considered when the following Standard is met:
"An engineering study of traffic conditions, pedestrian characteristics, and physical characteristics of the location shall be performed to determine whether the installation of a trffic control signal is justtfied at a particular location. The investigation of the need for a traffic control signal shall include an analysis of the applicable factors contained in the following trffic signal warrants and otherfactors related to existing operation and safety at the studlt location:

Worrant l, Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume.

Warrant 2, Four-Hottr Vehicttlar Volume.

Warrant 3, Peak Hour.

Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume.

Warrant 5, School Crossing.

Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System.

Warrant 7, Crash Experience.

Warrant 8, Roadwoy lletw'ork. "
Warrant 9, Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
In other words, in order to justify and recommend the installation of traffic control signals, as shown above there are nine (9) California MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants that should be analyzed. If any one, or a combination, of these warrants is met then a traffic signal should be considered. Yet, as also stated in the California MUTCD: "The satisfaction of a trffic signal warrant or warrqnts shall not in itself require the installation of a trffic control signal. " Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page 5 of 2I
10303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

TrafJic Control Device Warrants Analysis - Wildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS (continued)
Traffic volume data and collision history provide a good overall picture of intersection characteristics; hence, these are the conditions first reviewed by HCI in completing traffic signal warrants analyses, or other traffic control device analyses. Accordingly, the following analysis has focused on volume and collision data to determine if a traffic signal is warranted at the intersection of Wildwood Canyon Road and Canyon Drive, although all applicable traffic signal warrants and other factors such as restricted sight distance were included. It should be noted, if the warrant criteria in these guidelines are not met, the installation of an un-warranted traffic signal is typically not recommended.

Traffic Volumes
The Support guidelines describing the minimum volumes needed for a traffic control signal in Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume, of the California MUTCD is stated as follows:
"The Minimum Vehiailar Volume, Condition A, is intended for application at locations where a large volume of intersecting trffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. "
"The Interruption of Continuous Trffic, Condition B, is intended for application at locations where Condition A is not satis.fied and where the trffic volume on a major street is so heavy that trffic on a minor intersecting street srffirs excessive delay or conflict in entering or crossing the major street."
HCI collected Average Daily Traffic (ADT) vehicular approach counts to the intersection on Saturday, August 26, 2023, and also midweek on Thursday, October 19, 2023, in order to account for vehicles that typically use this 3-way intersection. The higher Thursday ADT bi- directional count for Wildwood Canyon Road is 5,927 vehicles per day with the highest AM peak-hour bi-directional volume having 555 vehicles, and 506 vehicles in the PM peak-hour.

The ADT directional approach count for Canyon Drive is 66 vehicles with the highest AM peak- hour directional volume having 7 vehicles, and 10 vehicles in the PM peak-hour. Table I (next page) provides a breakdown of the approach volumes.

The traflic volume data collected for this intersection is included in Appendk B.

Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page 6 of 2I
10403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS (continue{

TABLE I
24-HOUR INTERSECTION APPROACH VEHICLE COUNTS

AND HIGHEST HOURLY VOLUMES
Wildwood Canyon Road is considered the 'through' or'major' street at this rural residential/park 3-Way intersection, since it carries higher volumes from both approaches, and drivers are not required to slow down, or even stop, before proceeding straight through the intersection. In comparison, Canyon Drive is considered the 'minor' street as southbound drivers on Canyon Drive are required to stop at Wildwood Canyon Road and look both ways before proceeding to make a left-turn or right turn. It is typically expected that the traffic volumes on the minor street are significantly less than those on the major street. As can be seen from the table above, this is the case, as Canyon Drive carries just over lYo of the entire traffic entering the intersection (Wildwood Canyon Road carries 99Yo of entering traffic).

A part of the California MUTCD guideline criteria also calls for a reduction in the required minimum volumes when the critical approach speed (or 8|'h-percentile speed) on the major street exceeds 40 MPH. If this is the case, the minimum vehicular volumes to be met for a traffic signal installation are reduced to 70o . As mentioned, the posted speed limit on Wildwood Canyon Road is 45 MPH, and a prior 85th percentile speed was recorded at 50.2 MPH.

Therefore, theTDYo minimum volumes are considered applicable, and were used in this analysis.

All traffic count and speed data gathered were applied to the Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheets for the Traffic Volume Warrants #1, #2, and #3. As a result, the existing traffic volumes did not meet the minimum volumes required to satisfy any of the volume warrant criteria.

Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Poge 7 of 2I
Street Direction ADT Volume Directional Split Highest Hourly Volume Wildwood Canyon
Road
Eastbound 3,01 6 st%308 (4-sPM)
Westbound 2,911 49%40s (7 - 8 AM)
Canyon Drive
Southbound 66 t00%l0 (6-7PM)
Traffic Control Device ll/srrants Analysis - Wildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA 10503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS (continued)
Collision Historv
The California MUTCD guidelines in the Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies regarding collisions require that all of the following general criteria below are met in order to satisff Warrant #7 - Crash Experience:
"(A) Adequate trial of alternatives when satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency; and (B). Five (5) or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a traffic control signal, have occurued within a l2-month period, each crash involving personal injury or properD, damage apparentll' exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable crash; and (C). For each of any 8 hours of an average day, the vehicles per hour (vph) given in both of the 80 percent cohtmns of Condition A in Table 4C-l ... exists on the major street and the higher-volume minor-street approach ...".

The available collision history reported for the intersection was gathered from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). More specifically, the raw citywide collision data was obtained from the /-SWITRS website, HCI then formatted and prepared a comprehensive 5- year intersection traffic collision history report for this intersection (attached in Appendix C).

Collisions considered susceptible to correction by a traffic control signal are generally of the 'Broadside', 'Head-on', or other right-angle type involving vehicles and/or pedestrians/bicycles from conflicting approaches. These same are not considered correctible when they occur far away from the intersection. Other types of collisions categorized as 'sideswipe', 'rear-end', and 'hit object' type collisions are generally not considered susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, unless further review indicates otherwise. HCI reviewed all data in order to determine whether there were at least five (5) collisions in a l2-month period that were susceptible to correction by the installation of a traffic control signal. Table 2 on the next page provides a recent 5-year summary of collision history atlnear this intersection.

Hartzog & Crahill, Inc.Page I of 2I
Traffic Control Device Vl/arrants Analysis - Wildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA 10603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Truffic Control Device ll/aruants Analysls - Wildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, tn the City of Yucoipa, CA TR{FFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS (continuefi
TABLE2

INTERSECTION COLLISION SUMMARY
Notes:Information above is derived per the latest 5-year intersection traffic collision database file gathered from CHP-SWITRS (r-Srr{fR S webs ite\.

I ) Type of Coll. - Type of Collision (i. e., hroadside, rear-end, etc.) 2) Correctible? - Yes / No
As shown above, there has been one ( I ) reported collision reported near this intersection over the past (5+) years of available SWITRS collision data. The collision is not considered correctible as it did not occur at the intersection but 4l feet west of the intersection.

Since the collision warrant requires a minimum of five (5) reported crashes susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, to occur within a l2-month period, the collision warrant is not satisfied.

There are no other tralfic signal warrants satisfted or applicable for this intersection.

The completed Califurnia MUTCD Traffic Signal lVarrants lAorksheets cun be found in Appendk D.

Intersection
2018 2019 2020-21 2022 - March 2023
Date
Type of Coll.

I
Correctible?
Date
Type of Coll.

I
Correctible?
Date
Type of Coll.

I
Correctible?
Date
Type of Coll.

I
Correctible?
Wildwood
Canyon Road
at
Canyon Drive
None Reported None Reported None Reported 0U25t23 Other / No Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Poge 9 of 2I
10703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Traflic Control Device Vl/aruants Analysis - Wildwood Csnyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS (continue0
Visibilitv
Although not exactly found in the warrant criteria, another important criterion analyzed was the possibility of a driver's restricted view, especially from the side street of this T-intersection. It is noted, both roadways intersect perpendicularly, which is favorable for side-street sight distance.

However, due to the higher speeds on Wildwood Canyon Road, overall sight distance was carefully considered.

A driver's visibility (or sight distance) was measured from a typical stopped-vehicle location on Canyon Drive towards oncoming traffic on Wildwood Canyon Road. This measured distance was derived from the stopping sight distance guidelines found in the Califomia MUTCD (see Appendix E\. In this reference, a posted 45 MPH roadway speed recommends a minimum Stopping Sight Distance of 360 feet, while a 50 MPH roadway design speed (i.e., posted + 5 MPH) recommends a minimum Stopping Sight Distance of 425 feet, in order for a driver to see and stop for an object in their lane ahead. Since the 85th percentile speed of 50.2 MPH is higher than the posted speed, as a conservative measure, the 425 foot stopping sight distance was used.

As shown in Exhibit 3 (next page), this measured sight distance was clear and did meet the minimum recommended value of 425 feet when looking westerly and easterly at oncoming Wildwood Canyon Road traffic. As a result, side street visibility was found to be satisfactory.

Intersection lighting was also verified and found to be adequate as there is one street light fixture mounted on a wood utility power pole located on the south side of the intersection.

Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page I0 of 2I
10803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Traffic Control Device Vl/arrants Analysis - Wildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucoipa, CA EXHIBIT 3
425 foot sight distance
CANYON DRIVE (Looking lvesterly) @ WILDWOOD CANYON ROAD 425 foot sight distance
CANYON DRM (Looking Easterly) @ WILDWOOD CANYON ROAD
Hartzog & Crobill, Inc.Page II of 2I
{L
E,\r.L
./
=
L
I
llUYr--
t{f-./tl
r{I,l-tI
Is
\
a\\
t
rJ.-'*
JTF
Ntr
E=
br-r
Prtrtf].Dmufrx
ffi
Illrrr
----
I>---
'i--t-.8
I --4
10903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Traffic Control Device Warrants Analysis - Wildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA

MULTIWAY STOP WARRANTS ANALYSIS
Since the intersection data gathered did not satisff the warrants for a traffic signal installation, a multiway stop application is considered in this section of the analysis. The Califomia MUTCD Multiway Stop Applications Guidance criteria are described in the following four main parts:

I ) As an interim measure where traffic control signals are justified; 2) Reported crashes - .fire or more in a l2-month period that are susceptible to correction;
3) Traffic and pedestrian volumes, speeds, and delay; and 4) Where a combination of the above criteria are satisfied to 80 percent.

If any one, or a combination, of these criteria is met then a multiway stop application should be considered. If these criteria are not met, the installation of an unwarranted stop sign installation is typically not recommended.

The California MIITCD STOP Sign and Multiway Stop Applications guidelines are included in Appendk F.

The California MUTCD Multiway Stop Applications section contains similar guidelines, such as minimum collisions and traffic volumes necessary for the justification of a multi-way stop control. The general guidelines given for a stop sign application begin with using engineering judgment for the installation of a stop sign(s) on a street entering a through-highway and/or where high speeds, restricted view, or crash records indicate a need for control by a stop sign.

Further guidance criteria found in the California MUTCD include the following important statements: 'STOP signs should not be used for speed control... STOP signs should be installed in a manner that minimizes the numbers of vehicles having to stop... In most cases, the street carrying the lowest volume of traflic should be stopped... A STOP sign should not be installed on the major street unless justiJied by a trofJic engineering study.,. Multiway stop control is used where the volume of traflic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal." Hartzog & Crahill, Inc.Page 12 of 2I
11003/11/2024 City Council Agenda

MULTIWAY STOP WARRANTS ANALYSIS (continae\
Interim Measure for a Tralftc Signal
It has been shown in the above analysis that a traffic control signal is not warranted, or justified.

Collision History
As also shown in the traffic signal analysis, there has been one (l) reported collision near this particular intersection during the past five (5+) years. The collision is not considered correctible as it did not occur at the intersection but 4l feet west of the intersection. Therefore, the Reported Crashes criteria for a multiway stop installation is not satisfied, as the five (5) minimum correctible reported crashes in a l2-month period are not met for this intersection.

Traffic Volumes
A part of the California MUTCD Guidance criteria also calls for a change in minimum volumes required for a multiway stop when the critical approach speed (or 85't'-percentile speed) on the major street exceeds 40 MPH. Since this is the case, the minimum vehicular volumes to be met for a multiway stop installation are reduced to 70oh and were evaluated below.

The above traffic signal analysis showed that the traffic volumes on the minor street are considerably less than those on the major street at this intersection. tt is important to note that the hourly vehicle traffic counts shown in Table I above are given for the highest one hour of traffic, and serve as a good indicator to compare with the required traffic volumes in the Califomia MUTCD multiway stop warrant. In this case, they indicate that they will not satis$ the minimum volume guidelines, even at 70Yo reduced volumes. Moreover, the average hourly minimum volumes for a multiway stop application [210 vehicles per hourfrom both approaches on the major street and 140 for the minor street (which are 70o% volumes)J are to be satisfied for q[ of eight (8) hours of an average day.

Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page I3 of 2I
TrafJic Control Device Warrants Analysis - Wildwood Cunyon Rd at Canyon Dr,in the City of Yucaipa, CA 11103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Troffic Control Device Vl/arrants Analysis - Wildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA MULTIWAY STOP WARRANTS ANALYSIS (continue0
Table 3 below shows the California MUTCD minimum volume guidelines for a Multiway Stop Application in comparison with the highest hourly traffic count data. It is noted that both Parts I and 2 of the minimum volume warrants below must be satisfied in order to fulfill this traffrc volume warrant criteria.

TABLE 3

MULTIWAY STOP SIGN WARRANT FOR MINIMUM TRAFFIC VOLUMES

WILDWOOD CANYON ROAD AT CANYON DRIVE
Part l.
the vehicular volume entering the
ntcrsection from thc major strccl
lpproaches (total of both approachesl
rverages at least 300 (or ZtO as Z0n
vchicles per hour for any (8) hours of ar
lvcrage day,
Results:

Yes, average (430) vehicles per hour
Meets 100% of required average
hourly traffic volume
and
Part 2.

Thc combincd vchicular, pedestrian, and
bicycle volume entering the intersection from
the minor strcet approachcs (total of both
approachcs) avcrages at lcast 200 (eI-!!! as.
70%) units per hour for the same (t) hours,
with an avcragc dclay to minor-street vehicular
traffic of at least 30 scconds pcr vchiclc dunng
the highest hour,
Results:

No, averrye (71vehicles per hour
Only Soh of required hourly traffic volumes
hut
Part 3.

If thc 85'h -pcrccntilc approach spccd
of the major-street traffic exceeds 65
km/h or cxcccds 40 mph, the
minimum vchicular volumc warrants
are (70) percent of the above values.

Results:

Yes, 85th = 50.2 MPH
As shown above, even when the minimum volumes required for a multiway stop are reduced to 70Yo due to higher speeds, the average hourly intersection approach volumes only partially- satisfied the required volumes (100% major street / 525 minor street). Since both parts must be met, the traffic volume warrant for a multiway stop is not satisfied.

Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page 14 of 2 I
11203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE WARRANTS ANALYSIS
Due to the fact that none of the traffic signal or multiway stop warrant criteria was satisfied or found applicable, further consideration of other applicable traffic control devices were evaluated for this location. Specifically, in-roadway warning lights and/or a flashing beacon are possible traffic control installations that may be considered appropriate as a supplement for this location.

In-roadway warning lights will be evaluated below, and followed by the flashing beacon guidelines.

In-Roadway Lights
The California MUTCD describes this type of traffic control device as follows:

In-Roadway Lights are special types of highwav trffic signals installed in the roadway surface to warn users that they are approaching a condition on or adiacent to the roadway that might not be readily apparent and might require the road users to slow down and/or come to a stop...

The Caldornia MUTCD guidelines in Chapter 4N. In-Roodway Lights can be found in Appendix G.

Below are some of the applicable guidelines found in the California MUTCD for installation of this type of traffic control device:

Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page I5 of 2l
Traffic Control Device Warrants Analysis - ll/ildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA 11303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Traffic Control Device Warrants Analysis - Wildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE WARRANTS ANALYSIS (continued) In-Roadway Lights (continued)
Section 4N.02 In-Roadway Warning Lights at Crosswalks
Standard:
. If used, In-Roadway Warning Lights at crosswalks shall be installed only at marked crosswalks with applicable warning signs. They shall not be used at crosswalks controlled by YIELD signs, STOP signs, or traffic signals...
. If used, In-Roadway Warning Lights at crosswalks shall display a flashing yellow light when actuated...
o At least 40 pedestrians regularly use the crossing during each of any two hours (not necessarily ssnt.cutive) during a 24-hour period... . The vehicular volume through the crossing exceeds 200 vehicles per hour in urban areas or 140 vehicles per hour in rural areas during peak-hour pedestrian usage...
o The critical approach speed (85'h percentile speed) is 45 MPH or less... o In-Roadway Warning Lights are visible to drivers at the minimum stopping sight distancefor the posted speed limit...
o Public education on In-Roadwalt Warning Lights is conducted for new installations.

Based on the above guidelines, this intersection does not meet the speed criteria or the pedestrian criteria. The 85th percentile speed (which is 50.2 MPH) exceeded 45 MPH; and the pedestrian volumes were less than 40 during each of any two hours, even when including the bicycles and horses. Therefore, the warrant criteria is not considered satisfied.

Additionally, the California MUTCD provides for the following option Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page I6 of 2I
11403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE WARRANTS ANALYSIS (continued) In-Roadway Lights (continued)
Option:

Overhead or roadside Flashing Yellow Beacons may be instolled in conjunction with In-Roadway Warning Lights. In-Roadway Warning Lights may be installed independently, but are not necessarily intended to be a substitute for standardflashing beacons. Engineering judgment should be exercised.

As In-Roadway Lights are considered not warranted at this location due to the higher speeds and amount of pedestrians crossing, the option above leads us to the review of a new flashing beacon system at the marked crosswalk.

Flashing Beacons
The California MUTCD describes this type of traffic control device as follows:

A flashing beacon is a highway trafic signal with one or more signal sections that operates in a flashing mode. It can provide trffic control when used as an intersection control beacon or it can provide warning when used in other applications.

Since the intersection does not meet the warrants for a traffic signal or multiway stop, the alternative use of a flashing warning beacon is applicable as supplemental emphasis to the existing marked crosswalk and pedestrian crossing warning signs.

The California MUTCD guidelines in Chapter 4L. Flashing Beacons can be found in Appendix H.

Below are some of the applicable guidelines found in the California MUTCD for installation of this type of traffic control device:

Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page I7 of 2I
Traffic Control Device Warrants Analysrs - Wildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA 11503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Traffic Control Device Vl/arrants Anulysis - Wildwood Canyon Rd ut Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE WARRANTS ANALYSIS (continued) Flashing Beacons (continued)
Standard:

Beacons shall be flashed at a rate of not less than 50 nor more than 60 times per minute. The illuminated period of eachJlash shall not be less than I/2 and not more than 2/3 of the total cycle.

A Warning Beacon shall consist of one or more signal sections of a standard trffic signal face with a flashing CIRCULAR YELLOW signal indication in each signal section.

A Warning Beacon shall be used only to supplement an appropriate warning or regulatory sign or marker.

Option:

If Warning Beacons have more than one signal section, they may be fl ashed either alternativeb, or s imul taneous ly.

As there are no further applicable warrant guidelines for the installation of warning beacons, at this point engineering judgment may determine if a new flashing waming beacon system is justified at this intersection. Upon the process of elimination of applicable traffic control devices, the resulting traffic control device for crossing pedestrians at this particular location includes the installation of a new flashing warning beacon system to supplement the existing marked white crosswalk across Wildwood Canyon Road, with applicable pedestrian or horse crossing signs at the crosswalk. Since there are existing solar flashing yellow warning beacons on l0-foot high poles located in advance of the intersection, a new flashing yellow warning beacon system may be considered at the marked crosswalk. Besides the traditional overhead yellow flashing waming beacons, consideration may also be given to the installation of a solar- powered Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) system, which would include pedestrian- activated push-buttons. In addition, the current CA MUTCD guidelines for existing marked crosswalks include other measures, such as the Yield Here to Pedestrians sign (R1-5) and Yield line markings in advance of the crosswalk that are considered applicable for this location.

Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page 18 of 2I
11603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

WARRANTS ANALYSIS SUMMARY
HCI completed an analysis for possible recommendation of a traffic signal, a multiway stop, and in-roadway lights or flashing beacons for the existing marked crosswalk at the intersection of Wildwood Canyon Road and Canyon Drive.

The analysis of all applicable Traffic Signal Warrants provided in the California MUTCD showed that signalization is not warranted for the intersection of Wildwood Canyon Road and Canyon Drive. Specifically, all traffic count and speed data were applied to the Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheets for Traffic Volume Warrants #1, #2, and #3. The intersection traffic volume data did not come close to meeting the minimum volumes required in Warrant #l under Condition A or Condition B, nor in Warrants #2 and #3, even at the reduced 7002 minimum traffic volumes. Therefore, the minimum traffic volume warrants are not satisfied for consideration of signalization at this intersection. In terms of collision history, there has been one (l) reported collisions at the intersection during the past five (5+) years. Therefore, the Crash Warrant #7 criteria for a traffic signal is also not considered satisfied, as the five (5) minimum correctible reported crashes in a l2-month period were not met for this intersection.

Visibility was found sufficient for side-street traffic sight distance. In regards to pedestrian, bicycle, and horse activity, intersection information was collected during a peak Saturday period.

This weekend data did not meet requirements to justitr a traffic signal.

Intersection lighting was also noted in our field observations and considered adequate, as there is a streetlight fixture mounted on a utility wood pole located on the south side of the intersection.

The analysis of applicable Multiway Stop guidelines provided in the California MUTCD shows that a 3-Way Stop application is also not warranted for this intersection due to similar reasons described above.

Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page 19 of 2I
Traffic Control Device Wsrrants Analysis - llildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucuipa, CA 11703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

WARRANTS ANALYSIS SUMMARY (continuefi
Other traffic control devices were evaluated for installation at this intersection, which included in-roadway lights and flashing beacons. The In-Roadway Lights were reviewed and found not warranted due to the higher posted and 85'h percentile speeds exceeding the standard, as well as insufficient amount of pedestrians, bicyclists, and horses crossing Wildwood Canyon Road.

Our final review of a new flashing warning beacon system to supplement the existing marked crosswalk was found appropriate for consideration at this intersection due to the higher speeds on Wildwood Canyon Road. The flashing beacon guidelines do not have specific numbers to satisfu, as a warning beacon may be used only to supplement an appropriate warning or regulatory sign such as a PED XING warning signs at the marked crosswalk.

Besides the traditional overhead yellow flashing warning beacons, consideration may also be given to the installation of a solar-powered Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) system, which would include pedestrian-activated push-buttons. It is noted, RRFBs have been shown to be more effective at alerting drivers of pedestrians crossing the street than the traditional flashing beacons because the warning lights flash in rapid succession. lt is also important to note, the historical traffic count data for this intersection from back in 2009 had more pedestrians/bicycles/equestrians activity than the 2023 data. Since this location is adjacent to a community park on the south side, and also leads to the Wildwood Canyon State Park on the north side, it may be expected that the traffic count data volumes crossing at this location may return in the future. As such, it is recommended to enhance the existing marked crosswalk for the pedestrians/bicycles/equestrians with the installation of an RRFB system with pedestrian push-button activation, and new curb ramps.

Lastly, the current CA MUTCD guidelines for existing marked crosswalks include other measures, such as the Yield Here to Pedestrians sign (Rl-5) and Yield line markings in advance of the crosswalk that are considered applicable for this location (see Appendix I).

Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page 20 of 2I
Traffic Control Device Vl/arrants Analysis - Wildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA 11803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Traffic Control Device ll/aruants Analvsis - ll/ildwood Canyon Rd at Canyon Dr, in the City of Yucaipa, CA

RECOMMENDATIONS
Upon review of the guidelines for several types of traffic control devices at the intersection of Wildwood Canyon Road and Canyon Drive, the following improvements are provided for the City's consideration:
. Re-paint the white ladder-style marked crosswalks at the intersection due to fading. o lnstall advance Yield lines and Yield Here to Pedestrians signs in conformance with the latest uncontrolled crosswalk standard signage and markings as shown in Appendix I.

All existing signs and markings are recommended to conform to Appendix I. o Install ADA-compliant curb ramps at the northwest corner and southwest area of the intersection that aligns with the marked crosswalk across Wildwood Canyon Road. o lnstall a solar-powered Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) system at the marked crosswalk.

If the City approves the above improvements, the estimated cost for the design, administration, and construction of these items is $50,000.00.

Hartzog & Crabill, Inc.Page 2l of 2l
11903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

APPENDIX A

CALIFORNIA MUTCD

TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL NEEDS STADIES
GUIDELINES:
12003/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Califomia MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2. as amended for use in California) CHAPTER 4C. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL NEEDS STUDIES

Section 4C.01 Studies and Factors for Justifvinq Traffic Control Signals Standard:
or An engineering study of trallic conditions, pedestrian characteristics, and physical characteristics of the location shall be performed to determine whether installation of a traflic control signal is justified at a particular location.
or" On State highways, the engineering study shall include consideration of a roundabout (yield control). lf a roundabout is determined to provide a viable and practical solution, it shall be studied in lieu of, or in addition to a traffic control signa!.

Guidance:
on, On localsfreefs and highways, the engineering study should include consideration of a roundabout (yield control). tf a roundabout is determined to provide a viable and practical solution, it should be studied in lieu of, or in addition to a traffic control signal.

Support:
or. Refer to Caltrans' website (htto:// www.dot.ca.qov/hq/traffops/liaisons/ice.html) for more information on the Traffic Operations Policy Directive 13-02, lntersection Control Evaluation (lCE), and other resources for the evaluation of intersection traffic control strategies.
oz The investigation of the need for a tratfic control signal shall include an analysis of factors related to the existing operation and safety at the study location and the potential to improve these conditions, and the applicable factors contained in the following traffic signal warrants:

Warrant I, Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume
Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume
Warrant 5, School Crossing
Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System
Warrant 7, Crash Experience
Warrant E, Roadway Network
Warrant 9,Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
o: The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.

Support:
o+ Sections 8C.09 and 8C. l0 contain information regarding the use of traffic control signals instead of gates and/ or flashing-light signals at highway-rail grade crossings and highway-light rail transit grade crossings, respectively.

Guidance:
osA trffic control signal should not be installed unless one or more of the factors described in this Chapter are met.
odA trffic control signal should not be installed unless an engineering study indicates that installing a traffic control signal will improve the overall safety and,/or operation of the intersection. ot A traffic control signal should not be installed if it will seriously disrupt progressive tffic flow. oaThe study should consider the effects of the right-turn vehicles from the minor-street approaches.

Engineering judgment should be used to determine what, if any, portion of the right-turn trffic is subtracted from the minor-street traffic count when evaluating the count against the signal warrants listed in Paragraph 2. oo Engineering judgment should also be used in applying various traffic signal warrants to cases where approaches consist of one lane plus one left-turn or right-turn lane. The site-specific trffic characteristics should dictate whether an approach is considered as one lane or tvvo lanes. For example, for an approach with one lane for through and right-turning trffic plus a left-turn lane, if engineering judgment indicates that it should be considered a one-lane approach because the trffic using the left-turn lane is minor, the total traffic volume approaching the intersection should be applied against the signal warrants as a one-lane approach. The Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, ?014
12103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 828
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2. as amended for use in California) approach should be considered tv,o lanes if approximately half of the traffic on the approach turns left and the left-mrn lane is of srfficient length to accommodate all left-ntrn vehicles. rcsimilar engineering judgment and rationale should be applied to a street approach with one through/leftturn lane plus a right-turn lane. In this case, the degree of conflict of minor-street right-turn trffic with traffic on the major street should be considered. Thus, right-turn trffic should not be includecl in the minor-street volume if the movement enters the major street with minimal conflict. The approach should be evaluated as a one-lane approach with only the trffic volume in the through/left-turn lane considered. rr At a location that is under development or construction and w,here it is not possible to obtain a traffic count that would represent fitture trffic conditions, hourly volumes should be estimated as part of an engineering study for comparison with traffic signal warrants. Except for locations where the engineering study uses the satisfaction of Warrant 8 to justify a signal, a trffic control .signal installed under proiected conditions should have an engineering study done within I year of pfiting the signal into stop-and-go operation to determine if the signal is justified. If not justified, the signal should be taken out of stop-and-go operation or removed. n For signal warrant analysis, a location with a wide median, even if the median width is greater than 30 feet, should be considered as one intersection.

Option:
r: At an intersection with a high volume of left-turn traffic from the major street, the signal warrant analysis maybeperformedinamannerthatconsidersthehigherin€F
+elrrmgvdume of the major-street left-turn volumes plus the higher volume minor-street approach as the'minor street" volume and both approaches of the major street minus the higher of the major-street left-turn volume as 'major street' volume.
r+ For signal warrants requiring conditions to be present for a certain number of hours in order to be satisfied, any four sequential lS-minute periods may be considered as I hour if the separate l-hour periods used in the warrant analysis do not overlap each other and both the major-street volume and the minor-street volume are for the same specific one-hour periods.
rs For signal warrant analysis, bicyclists may be counted as either vehicles or pedestrians.

Support:
ro When performing a signal warrant analysis, bicyclists riding in the street with other vehicular traffic are usually counted as vehicles and bicyclists who are clearly using pedestrian facilities are usually counted as pedestrians.

Option:
rz Engineering study data may include the following:

A. The number of vehicles entering the intersection in each hour from each approach during 12 hours of an average day. It is desirable that the hours selected contain the greatest percentage of the 24-hour traffic volume.

B. Vehicular volumes for each traffic movement from each approach, classified by vehicle type (heavy trucks, passenger cars and light trucks, public-transit vehicles, and, in some locations, bicycles), during each l5- minute period of the 2 hours in the moming and 2 hours in the afternoon during which total traffic entering the intersection is greatest.

C. Pedestrian volume counts on each crosswalk during the same periods as the vehicular counts in Item B and during hours of highest pedestrian volume. Where young, elderly, and/or persons with physical or visual disabilities need special consideration, the pedestrians and their crossing times may be classified by general observation.

D. Information about nearby facilities and activity centers that serve the young, elderly, and/or persons with disabilities, including requests from persons with disabilities for accessible crossing improvements at the location under study. These persons might not be adequately reflected in the pedestrian volume count if the absence of a signal restrains their mobility.

E. The posted or statutory speed limit or the 85trr-percentile speed on the uncontrolled approaches to the location.

F. A condition diagram showing details of the physical layout, including such features as intersection geometrics, channelization, grades, sighfdistance restrictions, transit stops and routes, parking conditions, Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
12203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2. as amended for use in California)

pavement markings, roadway lighting, driveways, nearby railroad crossings, distance to nearest traffic control signals, utility poles and fixtures, and adjacent land use.

G. A collision diagram showing crash experience by type, location, direction of movement, severity, weather, time of day, date, and day of week for at least I year. rt The following data, which are desirable for a more precise understanding of the operation of the intersection, may be obtained during the periods described in Item B of Paragraph 17:

A. Vehicle-hours of stopped time delay determined separately for each approach.

B. The number and distribution of acceptable gaps in vehicular traffic on the major street for entrance from the minor street.

C. The posted or statutory speed limit or the 85*'-percentile speed on controlled approaches at a point near to the intersection but unaffected by the control.

D. Pedestrian delay time for at least two 3O-minute peak pedestrian delay periods of an average weekday or like periods of a Saturday or Sunday.

E. Queue length on stop-controlled approaches.

Standard:
rs Delay, congestion, approach conditions, driver confusion, future land use or other evidence of the need for right of way assignment beyond that which could be provided by stop sign shal! be demonstrated.

Support:
zo Figure 4C-101(CA) and 4C-103(CA) are examples of wanant sheets.

Guidance:
u Figure aCaNpA) should be used only for new lntersections or other locations where I ls nof reasonable to count actual traffic volumes.

Section 4C.02 Warrant 1. Eisht-Hour Vehicular Volume
Support:
otThe Minimum Vehicular Volume, Condition A, is intended for application at locations where a large volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. oz The Intem.rption of Continuous Traffic, Condition B, is intended for application at locations where Condition A is not satisfied and where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that traffic on a minor intersecting street suffers excessive delay or conflict in entering or crossing the major street. o-r It is intended that Warrant I be treated as a single warrant. If Condition A is satisfied, then Warrant I is satisfied and analyses of Condition B and the combination of Conditions A and B are not needed. Similarly, if Condition B is satisfied, then Warrant I is satisfied and an analysis of the combination of Conditions A and B is not needed.

Standard:
o,r The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following conditions exist for each of any 8 hours of an average day:

A. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 100 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-l exist on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection; or B. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 100 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-l exist on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection.

In applying each condition the major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of these 8 hours.

Option:
os [f the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the traffic volumes in the 70 percent columns in Table 4C-l may be used in place of the 100 percent columns.

Cuidance:
ooThe combination of Conditions A and B is intended for application at locations where Condition A i.s not sutisfied and Condition B is not satisfiecl and should be applied only after an atlequate trial of other alternatives that could cause less delay and inconvenience to traffic has failed to solve the trffic problems.

Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7 , zol4 Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals
12303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Califbrnia MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 830
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2. as amended firr use in California) Standard:
oz The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that both of the following conditions exist for each of any 8 hours of an average day:

A. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-l exist on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection; and B. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-l exist on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection.

These major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours for each condition; however, the 8 hours satisfied in Condition A shall not be required to be the same 8 hours satisfied in Condition B.

On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 8 hours.

Option:
os If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the traffic volumes in the 56 percent columns in Table 4C- I may be used in place of the 80 percent columns.

Section 4C.03 Warrant 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume
Support:
or The Four-Hour Vehicular Volume signal warrant conditions are intended to be applied where the volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal.

Standard:
oz The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study linds that, for each of any 4 hours of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher-volume minor-street approach (one direction only) all fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1 for the existing combination of approach lanes. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of these 4 hours.

Option:
o.r If the posted or statutory speed limit or the S5th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, Figure 4C-2 may be used in place of Figure 4C- l.

Section 4C.04 Warrant 3, Peak Hour
Support:
or The Peak Hour signal warrant is intended for use at a location where traffic conditions are such that for a minimum of I hour of an average day, the minor-street traffic suffers undue delay when entering or crossing the major street.

Standard:
o: This signal warrant shall be applied only in unusual cases, such as oftice complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial complexes, or high-occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time.
o.r The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the criteria in either of the following two categories are met:

A. If all three of the following conditions exist for the same I hour (any four consecutive lS-minute periods) ofan average day:
l. The total stopped time delay experienced by the traffic on one minor-street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds: 4 vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach or 5 vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; and

2. The volume on the same minor-street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vehicles per hour for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vehicles per hour for two moving lanes; and Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals
November 7 ,2014
12403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California)

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vehicles per hour for intersections with three approaches or 800 vehicles per hour for intersections with four or more approaches.

B. The plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher-volume minor-street approach (one direction only) for I hour (any four consecutive lS-minute periods) of an average day falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 for the existing combination of approach lanes.

Option:
o+ If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 8sth-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, Figure 4C-4 may be used in place of Figure 4C-3 to evaluate the criteria in the second category of the Standard. os If this walrant is the only warrant met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, the traffic control signal may be operated in the flashing mode during the hours that the volume criteria of this warrant are not met.

Guidance:
ot If this warrant is the onlv worrant met and a trffic control signal is justified bv an engineering study, the trffic control signal should be trffic-actuated.

Section 4C.05 Warrant 4. Pedestrian Volume
Support:
or The Pedestrian Volume signal warrant is intended for application where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians experience excessive delay in crossing the major street.

Standard:
o: The need for a traffic control signal at an intersection or midblock crossing shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following criteria is met:

A. For each of any 4 hours of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing the major street (total of all crossings) all fall above the curve in Figure 4C-5; or B. For I hour (any four consecutive lS-minute periods) of an average day, the plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing the major street (total of all crossings) falls above the curve in Figure 4C-7.

Option:
or If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 35 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, Figure 4C-6 may be used in place of Figure 4C-5 to evaluate Criterion A in Paragraph 2, and Figure 4C-8 may be used in place of Figure 4C-7 to evaluate Criterion B in Paragraph 2.

Standard:
o.r The Pedestrian Volume signal warrant shall not be apptied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal or STOP sign controlling the street that pedestrians desire to cross is less than 300 feet, unless the proposed traffic control signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. os If this warrant is met and a traflic control signal is justified by an engineering study, the traflic control signal shall be equipped with pedestrian signal heads complying with the provisions set forth in Chapter

48. Guiclance:
oalf this w'arrant is met and a traffic control signal is justified b1- an engineering study, then:

A. If it is installed at an intersection or major clriveway location, the trffic c'ontrol signal should also ctnilrol the minor-street or drivev'at- trffic, should be traffic-actuated, and should include pedestrian detection.

B. If it is installed qt a non-i,ttersection crossing,, the traffic control signal should be installed at least 100 feet from side streets or clriveways that are controlleel by STOP or YIELD signs, and should be pedestrian- actuated. If the trffic control signal is in.stalled at a non-intersection crossing, at least one of the signal faces should be over the traveled way for each approach, parking and other sight obstructions should be prohibitedfor at least l00feet in advance ofantl at least 20feet beyoncl the crossw,alk or site Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7,2014 Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals
12503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 832
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2. as amended for use in California) accommodations should be made through curb extensions or other techniques to provide adequate sight distance, and the installation should include suitable standard signs and pavement markings.

C. Furthermore, if it is installed within a signal system, the traffic control signal should be coordinated.

Option:
oz The criterion for the pedestrian volume crossing the major street may be reduced as much as 50 percent if the lSth-percentile crossing speed ofpedestrians is less than 3.5 feet per second. os A traffic control signal may not be needed at the study location if adjacent coordinated traffic control signals consistently provide gaps of adequate length for pedestrians to cross the street.

Section 4C.06 Warrant 5. School Crossins
Support:
or The School Crossing signal warrant is intended for application where the fact that schoolchildren cross the major street is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. For the purposes of this warrant, the word "schoolchildren" includes elementary through high school students.

Standard:
o: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered when an engineering study of the frequency and adequacy of gaps in the vehicular traffic stream as related to the number and size of groups of schootchildren at an established school crossing across the major street shows that the number of adequate gaps in the traffic stream during the period when the schoolchildren are using the crossing is less than the number of minutes in the same period (see Section 7A.03) and there are a minimum of 20 schoolchildren during the highest crossing hour.
o.r Before a decision is made to install a traffic control signal, consideration shall be given to the implementation of other remedial measures, such as warning signs and flashers, school speed zones, school crossing guards, or a grade-separated crossing.
ru The School Crossing signal warrant shall not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest trallic control signal along the major street is less than 3fi) feet, unless the proposed traflic control signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic.

Guidance:
os If this warrant is met and a trffic control signal is justifiecl by an engineering study, then:

A. If it is installed at an intersection or major drivew'ay location, the trffic control signal should al.so control the minor-street or clriveway trffic, should be traffic-actuated, and should include pedestrian detection.

B. If it is in.stallecl at a non-intersection cro.ssing, the trffic control signal should be installed at least l00feet from side streets or driveu,ays that are controlled by STOP or YIELD signs, and should be pede.strian- actuated- If the trffic control signal is installed at a non-intersectiott crossing, at least one of the signal faces should be over the traveled wa1- for each approach, parking and other sight obstructions should be prohibited for at least I 00 feet in advance of and at least 20 feet beyond the crosswalk or site accommodations should be made through curb extensions or other techniques to provide adequate sight distance, and the installation should include suitable standard signs and pavement marking,s.

C. Furthennore, if it is installed within a signal system, the trffic control signal should be coordinated.

Section 4C.07 Warrant 6. Coordinated Sienal Svstem
Support:
or Progressive movement in a coordinated signal system sometimes necessitates installing traffic control signals at intersections where they would not otherwise be needed in order to maintain proper platooning of vehicles.

Standard:
oz The need for a traflic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following criteria is met:

A. On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominantly in one direction, the adjacent traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicular platooning.

B. On a two-way street, adjacent traflic control signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation.

Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals
November 7 ,,2014
12603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Califomia MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2. as amended for use in California)

Guidance:
otThe Coordinated Signal System signal warrant should not be applied where the resultant spacing of traffic control signals would be less than 1,000 feet.

Section 4C.08 Warrant 7. Crash Experience
Support:
or The Crash Experience signal warrant conditions are intended for application where the severity and frequency of crashes are the principal reasons to consider installing a traffic control signal.

Standard:
oz The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that all of the following criteria are met:

A. Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency; and
B. Five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a traflic control signal, have occurred within a l2-month period, each crash involving personal injury or property damage apparently exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable crash; and C. For each of any 8 hours of an average day, the vehicles per hour (vph) given in both of the E0 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-l (see Section 4C.O2), or the vph in both of the E0 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-l exists on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approach, respectively, to the intersection, or the volume of pedestrian traffic is not less than 80 percent of the requirements specified in the Pedestrian Volume warrant. These major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the E hours.

Option:
o.r If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 8sth-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the traffic volumes in the 56 percent columns in Table 4C- I may be used in place of the 80 percent columns.

Section 4C.09 Warrant 8. Roadwav Network
Support:
or Installing a traffic control signal at some intersections might be justified to encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network.

Standard:
o: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the common intersection of two or more major routes meets one or both of the following criteria:

A. The intersection has a total existing, or immediately projected, entering volume of at least 1,000 vehicles per hour during the peak hour of a typical weekday and has S-year projected traffic volumes, based on an engineering study, that meet one or more of Warrants l, 2, and 3 during an average weekday; or
B. The intersection has a total existing or immediately projected entering volume of at least 1,000 vehicles per hour for each ofany 5 hours ofa non-normal business day (Saturday or Sunday). o.r A major route as used in this signal warrant shall have at least one of the following characteristics:

A. It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for through traffic flow.

B. It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a city.

C. It appears as a major route on an oflicial plan, such as a major street plan in an urban area traffic and transportation study.

Section 4C.10 Warrant 9.Intersection Near a Grade Crossins Suppo(:
or The Intersection Near a Grade Crossing signal warrant is intended for use at a location where none of the conditions described in the other eight traffic signal warrants are met, but the proximity to the intersection of a Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies November 7,2014 Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals
12703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 834
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) grade crossing on an intersection approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal.

Guidance:
ozThis signal warrant should be applied only after adequate consideration has been given to other alternatives or after a trial of an alternative has failed to alleviate the safety concerns associated with the grade crossing.

Among the alternatives that should be considered or tried are:

A. Providing additional pavement that would enable vehicles to clear the track or that would provide space for an evasive maneuver, or
B. Reassigning the stop controls at the intersection to make the approach across the track a non-stopping approach.

Standard:
or The need for a traflic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that both of the following criteria are met:

A. A grade crossing exists on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign and the center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop line or yield line on the approach; and B. During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traflic uses the crossing, the plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the minor-street approach that crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection) falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10 for the existing combination of approach lanes over the track and the distance D, which is the clear storage distance as defined in Section 14.f3.

Guidance:
o+The following considerations apply when plotting the traffic volume data on Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10:

A. Figure 4C-9 should be used if there ts only one lane approaching the intersection at the track crossing location and Figure 4C- l0 should be used if there are two or more lanes approaching the intersection at the t rack c ros sin g loc ation.

B. After detennining the actual distance D, the curve for the distance D that is nearest to the actual distance D should be used. For example, rf the actual distance D is 95 feet, the plotted point should be compared to the curve for D = 90 feet.

C. If the rail trffic arrival times are unknown, the highest trffic volume hour of the day should be used.

Option:
os The minor-street approach volume may be multiplied by up to three adjustment factors as provided in Paragraphs 6 through 8.
oo Because the curves are based on an average of four occurrences of rail traffic per day, the vehicles per hour on the minor-street approach may be multiplied by the adjustment factor shown in Table 4C-2 for the appropriate number of occurrences of rail traffic per day.
oz Because the curves are based on typical vehicle occupancy, if at least 2Vo of the vehicles crossing the track are buses carrying at least 20 people, the vehicles per hour on the minor-street approach may be multiplied by the adjustment factor shown in Table 4C-3 for the appropriate percentage of high-occupancy buses. or Because the curves are based on tractor-trailer trucks comprising l0%o of the vehicles crossing the track, the vehicles per hour on the minor-street approach may be multiplied by the adjustment factor shown in Table 4C-4 for the appropriate distance and percentage of tractor-trailer trucks.

Standard:
os If this warrant is met and a traflic control signal at the intersection is justified by an engineering study, then:

A. The traffic control signal shall have actuation on the minor street; B. Preemption control shall be provided in accordance with Sections 4D.27,8C.09, and EC.IO; and C. The grade crossing shall have flashing-light signals (see Chapter 8C).

Guidance:
rc If this warrant is met and a tffic control signal at the intersection is justified by an engineering study, the grade crossing should have automatic gates (see Chapter 8C).

Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals
November 7 ,,2014
12803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 835
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2. as amended for use in California) Section 4C.101(CA)Criterion for School Crossinq Traffic Siqnals or Standard:

A. The signa! shall be designed for full-time operation.

B. Pedestrian signal faces of the lnternationa! Symbol type shall be installed at all marked crosswalks at signalized intersections along the "Suggested Route to Schoo!." C. !f an intersection is signalized under this guideline for school pedestrians, the entire intersection shall be signalized.

D. School area traffic signals shall be traffic actuated type with push buttons or other detectors for pedestrians.

Option:
oz Non-intersection school pedestrian crosswalk locations may be signalized when justified.

Section 4C.102(CA) Bicycle Sional Warrant
Guidance:
ot A bicycle signal should be considered for use only when the volume and collision or volume and geometric warrants have been met:

1. Volume; When W = B x V and W> 50,000 and B > 50.

Where: W is the volume wanant. B ls fhe number of bicycles af fhe peak hour entering the intersection. V is the number of vehicles at the peak hour entering the intersection. B and V shalluse ffie same peak hour.

2. Collision;When 2 or more bicycle/vehicle collrslons of types susceptlb/e to correction by a bicycle signal have occuned over a 12-month peiod and the responslb/e public works official determines that a bicycle signalwill reduce the number of collisions.

3. Geometic;
(a) Where a separate bicycle/ multiuse path intersects a roadway. (b) At other locafions to facilitate a bicycle movement that is not permitted for a motor vehicle.

Chapter 4C - Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2014
12903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

APPENDIX B

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT),
& PEAK.HOUR PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLES, & HORSE

INTERSECTION DATA
FOR

WILDWOOD CANYON ROAD
AT

CANYON DRIVE
13003/11/2024 City Council Agenda

DAITY TOTALS DAIIY TOTALS
NB SB EB WB Tota!
5,9930 66 3,016 2,glt
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Canyon Dr & Wildwood Canyon Rd
Day: Thursday
Date: toll9l2o23 Highest 8 Hours from a Side-Street Perspective.

City: Yucaipa
Project f : CA23_030067_001
450
400
350
300
250
200
r50
100
50 0 EEEEEEEEEEE8538t885883
oe EE(\ .n
-t Fa
EB W8
Etl E E
@
E oI
@
E
01 8o E E EFl
r{
fi):fi)
00:15
00:30
00:45
0 0
0 0
2 2
2 3
0 1
8 4
2 3
10 7
12:00
12:15
12:30
12245
0 2
0 5
36 63
47 47
49 48
32 56
85 113
79 109
01:fi)
01:15
01:30
01:45
0 0
0 0
4 2
3 2
2 1
0 2
6 3
3 4
13:fi)
13:15
13:30
13:45
0 0
2 1
42 50
38 47
34 40
45 47
76 90
85 95
02:fi)
02:15
02:30
02:45
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
1 0
0 2
1 0
2 2
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
2 1
2 2
68 64
55 65
57 51
47 60
t27
t26
104
t27
03:fl)
03:15
03:30
03:45
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 3
1 1
2 7
2 1
3 10
15:fi)
15:15
15:30
15:45
0 3
1 0
68 59
62 69
60 53
4L
52 128
115
104
tzt
04:00
04:15
04:30
(}4:45
1 2
0 2
4 2
4 13
5 4
4 15
15:ff)
16:15
16:30
16:45
0 0
0 0
80 83
84 51
48 48
47 55
t28
131
131
116
05:00
05:15
05:30
05:45
0 0
1 0
2 3
4 L2
7 15
10 16
9 18
15 28
17:fi)
L7zLS
17:30
L7:45
1 0
0 5
67 7L
56 7L
4L
62 53
45 109
133
119
t22
06:fi)
06:15
05:30
06:45
0 0
0 0
11 L7
18 27
20 31
32 57
31 48
50 84
18:fi)
18:15
18:30
18:45
5 4
1 0
58 51
50 50
48 45
32 27
tzl,
110
93 77
07:fi)
07:15
07:30
07:45
1 2
0 2
30 29
47 44
70 113
Lt4
L08
101
L44
161
154
19:fl)
19:15
19:30
19:45
0 0
0 0
39 38
31 40
24 15
25 15
53 53
55 56
08:00
08:15
08:30
08:45
1 0
3 0
56 46
33 37
58 57
46 44
125
103
82 81
20:fi)
20:15
20:30
2O:45
0 0
1 0
40 26
32 25
L2
13 L7
L7
52 39
50 42
09:fi)
09:15
09:30
09:45
0 0
2 2
30 39
38 32
43 38
29 39
73 77
59 73
21:fi)
21:15
21:30
2L:45
0 0
1 0
20 23
26 18
10 8
10 13
30 31
37 31
10:fi)
10:15
10:30
10:45
3 2
2 0
30 42
30 39
47 4L
35 4L
80 85
58 80
22:OO
22:tS
22:30
22:45
2 0
0 0
5 15
11 13
6 L4
L2
10 t4
29 2t
23 11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
0 0
1 0
27 43
46 45
45 30
49 4L
72 73
95 86
23:fi)
23:15
23:30
23:45
1 0
1 0
7 8
3 4
4 5
4 0
t2
13 8
4 TOTAU 0 22 889 t342 2253 0 44 2t27 1s59 3740
SPLIT %o% t% t9% 60% 38%SPLIT %o% t% 57% 42% 62%

TIME NB SB EB
l5-Minutes Interval

WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAT
O0:00
01:00
02:fi)
03:fi)
04:00
05:fi)
06:fi)
07:fi)
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 5
4 4
7 1
913
11 5
23 5 11
523
2t 48
73 140
150 405
L72 215
139 149
L4t 165
161 165
22 16
5 16
28 70
2t3
s60
391
292
313
327
12:00
13:00
14:0O
15:00
15:00
17:00
18:fi)
19:00
20:fi)
21:00
22:OO
23:fi)
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
fl):00
8 193 18s
3 L77 155
7 252 225
4 2s8 206
0 308 198
5 275 202
10 239 L52
0 L48 80
I L23 59
1874t
24542
22213
386
346
484
468
s06
483
401
228
183
t29
89 17
Peak Perlod
Volumc
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factol
t342
7:00
405

0.888
12:00
889
7:30
193

0.852
fi):fi)
9 0.750
to
22 9:30
Peak Perlod
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factol
to
u
t7:45
15 0.750
00:fl!
2L27
15:45
316

0.940
1569
14:15
228

0.934
12:00
3740
15:45
511

0.975
Peek Perlod
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factot
07:fl1 to O9:fi1
9 322 520
7:45 7:30 7:00
5 193 405

0.500 0.852 0.888
951
7:L5
584

0.907
Peak Perlod
Volumr
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Fastor
400
15:45
211

0.851
to
5 15:00 18:00
583
5 308
17:00 16:00

0.300 0.917
989
15:00
505

0.955

WB TOTAL

WB TOTAL
Hourly lntervals

NB SB EB
STATIST!CS

NB SB EB
NB SB
-t-rtl:r
TIME
2253
7:L5
584

0.907
13103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Canyon Dr & Wildwood Canyon Rd
City: Yucaipa
Project fl : CA23_030055_020
15 10
11945
12:fi)
12:15
L2:30
L2:45
59 50
59 33
50 49
42 48
1 0
0 1 2 199 )o7
120
99 101
82 402
0:00
0:15
0:30
0:45
7 2
6 2
8 8
5 7
0 0
0 0 28 L7
5 3
9 5 23
13:0O
13:15
13:30
13:45
42 4t
44 46
60 s3
52 45
1 2
2 2 2107 L73
103
95 98
93 390
1:00
1:15
1:30
1:45
3 0
5 1
3 3
3 4
0 0
0 0 13 10
2:00
2:15
2:30
2;45
1 1
1 0
3 3
1 2
0 0
0 o 9 3
4 4
2 2 L2
14:fi)
14:15
14:30
14:45
44 55
35 37
64 46
4L
53 0
2 1
0 L7L3204
108
103
77 90 378
92 85
92 go 160
3:00
3:15
3:30
3:45
1 0
2 1
1 4
0 1
0 0
0 o 5 4
2 4
2 2 10
L5:OO
15:15
15:30
15:45
54 37
42 43
51 4L
48 195 40 151
L
1 0
2 4
16:fi)
15:15
15:30
16:45
45 51
60 54
59 68
50 55
1 0
1 o )1)?70)444
105
119
111
109
4:00
4:15
4:30
4:45
1 3
1 5
3 0
2 2
0 0
0 0 7 11
4 3
3 8 18
10 8
1074 42
17:0O
17:15
17:30
L7245
54 53
39 40
54 59
54 54
0 0
0 o 221 185
108
LL2
93 94 407
5:00
5:15
5:30
5:45
8 3
5 8
2 5
4 5
0 0
0 0 t7 25
5:00
5:15
6:30
6:45
511
910
11 10
19 44 15 46
0 1
0 o 1
15 20
2L
34 91
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
49 38
55 42
44 36
40 189 42 158
1 0
0 4 5
88 98
80 85 352
19:fi)
19:15
19:30
19:45
32 29
4t
)9
44 34
33 30
1 3
7 5 141 13115
ll
55 81
64 )88
7:00
7:15
7:30
7:45
20 L723 L727 292s 95 45 108
0 0
1 0 1
37 40
57 70 204
59 76
86 74 295
20:fi)
20:15
20:30
20:45
24 2t
27 31
28 28
2L
25 2
0 3
0 5 to2 103
54 49
5L
55 270
8:00
8:15
8:30
8:45
30 2634 4052 3240 155 33 131
3 2
2 L 8
409
89 101
98 1)1
21:OO
21:15
21:30
2L:,45
32 32
29 19
25 1120 106 16 7A
1 0
0 o 1
65 48
36 36 185
9:00
9:15
9:30
9:45
32 54
46 52
49 48
10 s8 185 60 2t4
3 3
1 3
10:0O
10:15
10:30
1O:45
44 50
54 51
44 43
53 55
2 1
3 )205 199
90 94
720
108 4L2
22zAO
22:15
2223O
22:45
2L 2518 1813 L213 55 L2 57
0 0
0 0
46 35
25 25 L32
a)7
L24
85 113
10s
23:fiI
23:15
23:30
2ilz4S
16 ZL
11 11
1571558q44
0 0
0 o
37 22
22 25 106
11:fi)
11:15
11:30
11:45
66 s033 50ss 5613 58 2L2 46 202
8 2
2 1
3554TOTALS4t9779701988TOTALS45L922L587
sPur %2.Lv 49.L%48.8%ts.2%SPLIT %L.2%s2.6% 46.2%il.8%
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
19:15 15:00 16:30 15:15
L7 232 22L u7

0.607 0.8s3 0.921 0.939
AM Peak Hour
AM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
10:30 10:15 9:00 10:15
2t4 u615227

0.459 0.860 0.892 0.899
7 - 9 Volume
7-9PeakHour
7-9PkVolume
Pk Hr Factor
251
8:00
155

0.750
499 I a-6Volume
8:oo lo - s Peak Hour
29s lo - t Pk volume

0.858 I t* Hr Factor
9 239 2 453 395 851
16:00 15:00 15:308:00 7:45 16:15
L43 2 232 22L u7

0.500 0.853 0.921 0.9390.667 0.794
Day: Saturday
Date: 0812612023
TotalEBWB
2,899 2,657 5,642DAITY TOTALS 086
NB SB
TOTALEBWBSBAM Period NB NB 5B EB WBTOTAL PM Period
TotalEBWB
5,642DAILY TOTALS SBNB
0 13203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Canyon Dr
0 2 0
0 1 0
189 201
0 0 0 0
1 4 0 0
224 204
t,u
tro
coottoo]g
=
=CLtoo
CL
o!l3
o5
n
CL
0 0 0
0 0 0
1-Way Stop(SB)
441

0.90 AM
403
NOON

0.96 0
PM

CONTROL
TEV
PHF

PM NOON AM
211 194

PM NOON AM
AM 4 AM
NOON
PM 0 PM000
t'
0 0 3
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
+
PM 0 0 0 0
AM 0
4 NooN

AM NOON PM
o+
+0

AM NOON PM
OPM
NooN 0 0 NooN
0AM
205 226
10 0
5 {+bl,
0100 ot
1+
o€
os
.Io
Jo
+1
ao 0000art?
Canyon Dr
Prepared by National Data & Surveyi.g Services
Canyon Dr & Witdwood Canyon Rd
Peak Hour Turni.g Movement Count
lD: 23-030055-001
City: Yucaipa
Day: Saturday
Date: 08/2612023
ooCz{
!m
4o0a
otfoE
Y
IIJ
o.
10:15 am - 11:15 am
01:30 pm - 02:30 pm
NONE
Totals (AM)
9:00 AM - 12:00 PM
12:00 PM - 03:00 PM
NONE
Total Bikes (AM)j L oooJtr.

Or{ON€tr'
it?ooo
ett ?ooo
oott)o€tnor{.t t rr
it?oooit?ooo
ooo{trr
rrl ?oooa\$
j L
1-
t_
t-
l-
Lt
224+
43 204+
01 o t3
<- 201
fo
10 +. 189
fo
t0
+0
fo
6t
2+
0a
t0
+1
f00a-l
-l
-J l_S .d.
a$Pedestrian s (C rosswalks)-J0,

0.)
0a-l
-J l_
Total Bikes (NOON)
t0
+0
f0
0,
0+
0a
t0
+0
eo
Totals (NOON)
-ll-
-l
AM
NOON
PM
oo
rl
ooo
zooz
zoozE
=o.
+ooo
NOON
s
S
7 [""
$Eo.
zooz E
.%.
1b
tOl"
na,
o oo
.,4'.
\!2
S
PM
NOON
AM
Srtlo
00+
1 ooo+OF{+-l l-
-J
Totals (PM)
oott
PM
AM
0 0
0 +
to
n
00t
n
NOON
AM
PM
Tota! Bikes (PM)
o.t
fl
o
0,
0+
0a =Gac
\oet?oo
l_
1-
zooz Eo.
n
s
"d.

SOUTHBOUND
ozfo
mFa
LIJ
€
rn
U'{
tpoCzg

NORTHBOUND
13303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Canyon Dr & Wildwood Canyon Rd
Clty: Yucaipa
Control: 1-Way Stop(SB)
ProrGGt ID: 23-030055-m I
Detc: 08/26/2023
NS/EW Canyon tr Gnyon Dr Wknrcd Canyon Rd Wildrood Canyon Rd t
I
I
I
0 st
I
ST
0 SR
0 srl
0 Ft
I
ET
0 ER
0 EU
0 NI
0 NT
0 NP
0lrr
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUNDNORTHEOt'ND
0 wt
I
WT
0 lrR
0 lnI

WESTBOUND
TOTAT
101
96 9:15
9:30
l0: l5
l0:30
l0:45
I l:00
l1: l5
I l:30
I l:45
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 43
42 52
5l
65 32
53 56
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0_
0 0
0 0-
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 50
5r
50 50
49 56
46 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
012
2 t
44 45
5l
49 59 60
43 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 I 0_
90 93
l19
106
123
&4
ll2
104
0 8l o/^
WL WR
0 5
O OOo/o
WT
609

99.190/"
wt
0 o 00*
TOTAI.
1239
NL
0 NT
0 NR
0 M..,
0 :I

TOTAL VOLUMES
APPROACH ort's
SL ST SR stJ110180

37.93o/o 0.000/o 62.07Vo 0.qlh
EL ET ER EU858800l.3r% 98.65% 0.0096 o.qnr
0 201 3 0
0 944

0.000 0,985 0.250 0.(m
TOTAI
.l4l

0.8,96
0 0 0 0
;l 0.000 0.m 0.(m 0.(m

PEAK HR, VOL

PEAK HR, FACTOR
0100.000 0.417

0.429
224 00.862 0.(m

0.852
2 0

0.500 0.000 0.2y)0.un
0 NI
0 IrIt
0 sr
I
ST
0 sR.
0 sr.r
0 NT
0 NR

SOUTHBOUNDNORTHBOUND
0 EL
0 ER
0 EU
I
ET

EASIBOUND
0 WL
I
WT
0 wR
0 wu

WESTBOUND
TOTAI.
99 101
_81__
104
95 r00
0 0
0_
0 2
3 0
0 I
I
0 19
42 47
60 5r
5r
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 45
62 46
37 52
0 0
0 0
0 0.16000430005600o3/-r003700
0 0
33 43
50 59
0 0
39 44
0 0
105
105
74 89
l2: l5
l2:30
lJ.a_5
l:00
l: l5
l:30
2: 15
2:30
2:45
oollo00100
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
I
0 10
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0000l0l0l020
NL
0 NT
0 NR
0 NU
0 sL 5T 5R St20100

16.670/o 0.000/o 83.33q6 0.fiXh
EL ET ER EU8601 00
r.31q6 98.6$h o.fi)% o.mqt
WL
0 WR
2 0.00o/o 0.37o/o
wt
0 0.flrh
WT
543

99.630/o
TOTAI
l 165TOTAL VOTUMES
APPROACH ort's

PEAK HR I

PEAK HR VOL I
PEAK HR FACTOR I 0.000 0.0m 0.(m 0.(m
1 0 5 0

0.2s0 0.000 0.62s 0.(m
4 0.333 0.mo
2il00.&t3 0.m0

0.83!)
0 0

0.000 0.0m
189 00.8,+{ 0.000

0.8+4
TOTAL
lo3

0.960
NOON
AM
0 2
I
I 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 I
0 0
0 0
-l
I
0 13403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

NationalData & Surveying Services
Intersection Turnirg Movement Count
Location: Canyon Dr & Wildwood Canyon Rd Project ID: 23-030055-001 City: Yucaipa Date:08/26/2023
Data - Pedestrians Crosswalks
NS/EW Streets:Canyon Dr Canyon Dr Wildwood Canyon Rd Wildwood C;nyon Rd

NORTH LEG
EB WB

SOUTH LEG
EB WB

EAST LEG
NB SB

WEST LEG

NB SB TOTAL
9:00 AM
9: 15 AM
9:30 AM
9:45 AM
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
1 2
0 0
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
1 0
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11 :30 AM
11:45 AM
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH o/o's i
EB
2 100.00o/o
WB
0 0.00o/o
EB
0 WB
0 NB
0 SB
0 NB
1 SB
2 33.33o/o 66.670/o
TOTAL
5 PEAK HR :1O:15 am - 11:15 am
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR :
1 0

0.250

0.250
0 0 0 0 0 1

0.250

0.250
TOTAL
2 0.500
AM

NORTH LEG
EB WB

SOUTH LEG
EB WB

EAST LEG
NB SB

WEST LEG

NB SB TOTAL
12:00 PM
L2:L5 PM
12:30 PM
12:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2:00 PM
2: 15 PM
2:30 PM
2:45 PM
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAT VOLUMES :

APPROACH o/o's :

EB
0 WB
0 EB
0 WB
0 NB SB
00 SB
0 NB
0 TOTAL
0 PEAK HR :O1:3O Dm - O2:30 om
PEAK HR VOL :

PEAK HR FACTOR:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL
0 NOON
13503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turnirg Movement Count
Location: C-anyon Dr & Wildwood Canyon Rd
Oty: Yucaipa
Control: l-Way Stop(SB)
Prord ID: 23-030055-001
Drtc: Wl26l2O23
NS/EW Cxryo.r 0r Canyon Dr Wildf,ood Canyon Rd Wildnood Canyon Rd 0 0 0 000 0
EL
I
ET

EASTBOUND
0 WL
I
WT
0 WR
0 WU

WESTBOUND
TOTAT
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 _9
0 0
0 a
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
I
0 t
0 I
0 2
_0
0 0
0 _q
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
I
0 0
0 t
I
0 I
0 0
0 0
I
0 0
4 L
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0_
0 0
0 0
l0: l5
l0:30
l0:45
ll:fi)
l l:15
ll:30
I l:45
0 0 _ o_o o I o _0 0_00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
9: t5
9:30
EtETERzu6400
60-flrh ao.fixh o.firh o.firx
WL
0 WT WR WU
4 0 0

0.00o/o 100.000/o 0.00o/o 0.0096
TOTAT
l4
NL
0 NT
0 NR
0 NU
0 :l

TOTAT VOTUMES
APPROACH o/o's
SL
0 ST
0 SR
0 gJ
0 PEAK HR. :l 1O:15 am l1:15 em 200.5m 0.(m
0-.tm

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.(m
0 0000 6

0.375 0.0(x)
0 0

0.000 0.mo
l00.2s0 0.000

0.250
TOTAI.
9 0.,050
0 o 0 0
;l 0.000 0,m 0.(m 0.m0

PEAK HR, VOL

PEAK HR, FACTOR
0 Fll
0 FI
0 FR
I
FT

EASTBOUNO
0 Wt

WESTBOUND
I 0
WT WR
0 unt TOTAI
0 Nt
0 NT
0 NU
0 SL
I
ST
0 SR
0 sL,

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND
o
0 0
__0 _-
0 0
0q
0 0
0 0
l:{5 nl
2:(tr Pt{
2:15 Ptr
2:30 Pl'l
2:45 PM
lz:(I) Pi,l
l2: l5 PtJ
12:30 PtJ
-r?,_15-Ell:(tr Pfi
l:15 Pil
l:30 Pil
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
IIol-r-Tolol
_q_ l-
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0l0tolOITTol0l0to--r-olol0l
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 I
I
I
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00_
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
EL
0 ET
0 ER
0 EU
0 WL
0 WT
0 WR
0 lrlnj
0 TOTAL
0TOTAT VOtUlrlES
APPROACH I}6'S
NL
0 NT
0 NR
0 NU
0 SL
0 ST
0 SR
0 sU
0 0 0 0 00.000 0.m0 0.(m 0.(m
0 0 0 00.000 0.000 0.000 0.(m
TOTAL
0PEAK HR VOL I

PEAK HR, FACTOR I
O1:3O om - 02:3O om I
UUUUo.ooo o.o(n o.m o.o0o I o.ooo o.oo0 0.000 0.m
NOON
I
ST
0 AIT
SOU I HtsOUNL)NORTHEOUND
0 ER
0 EU
AM
0 0
0 0
0 NR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
13603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
location: Canyon Dr & Wildwood Canyon Rd
Clty: Yucaipa
Control: l-Way Stop(SB)
Prorcr ID: 23-030055-001
DrtE:08/2q2023
Data -
NS/EW Streets:Canyon t)r Canyon Dr Wildrrood C-anyon Rd Ittldnood Canyon Rd 0 NL
0 NT
0 NR
0 M,,
0 SL
I
ST
0 SR
0 SU
0 EL
1 ET
0 ER
0 EU

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
0 wt wlI

WESTBOUND
0 0
WR
I

WT TOTAI
9: l5
9:30
l0: l5
l0:30
l0:45
I l:00
I l:15
I l:30
I l:{5
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0_
0 0
0 0
0000000000000000000000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
I 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 ,0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
TOTAL VOLUMES :

APPROACH o/o's :

NL
0 NT
0 NR
0 M.,
0 SL
0 ST
0 SR
0 sU
0 EL
0 ET
0 ER
0 EU
0 WL
0 WT
0 WR
0 WU
0 TOTAT
0 10:15 am 11:15 am

PEAT HR VOL

PEAK HR, FACTOR
0 00.000 0.m 0.m0 0.(m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.000 0.000 0.000 0.m 0.(m 0.(m 0.0m 0.(m 0 0 0 00.000 0.000 0.000 0.(m
TOTAT
0 AM
0 llt
0 NT
0 NR
0 NU
0 SL
I
sr
0 SN,
0 ST'

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND
0 EL
I
ET
0 ER
0 EU

EASTBOUND
0 wt

WESTBOUND
0 WR
I
WT
0 unl TOTAJ
-!t1s3!2:fi) Ptl
2:15 Ptl
2:30 Pftf
2:45 PM
Iz:(x) Pil
l2:l5 Ptl
12:30 Ptl
t?irJ-B!
l:00 Ptl
l:l5 Ptl
l:30 Ptl
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 0 0 _ 0_ I 0____q _g __q_oooo
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00000000000000
000000000000000000000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
9000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
00000000000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 -0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL VOTUT{ES
APPPOACII olD'(
NL
0 NT
0 NR
0 NU
0 SL
0 ST
0 SR
0 sU
0 EL
0 ET
0 zu
0 WL
0 WT
0 WR
0 wt,
0 TOTAL
0 PEAK HR,

PEAK HR VOL
PEAK HR, FACTOR 0.000 0.0m 0.(m 0.(m
0 0 0 00.000 0.000 0.000 0.m0
0 0 0 00.m0 0.(m 0.m0 0.(m
0 0 0 00.000 0.000 0.000 0.(m
rOTAT
NOON
9:{5 Al{
lO:fi) Al,l
t00looloolooret00loolootuulooloo
lo o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
I
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0I
0 0
0 0
0 0
ER
0 0
13703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

APPENDIX C

INTERSECTION COLLISION HISTORY
13803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

r{
i5o
F{
(u
o0(!
CL
q,oco
=E
E
EB g €6tL t ool€o 3s';'r E a5€Ei PE?
IEE;g*gE,.
-
Ir ..r,oo =oi;;;:*(oro.F,Fr-NN(\(\ahlO '
e
EoE&3b?r E (D5 oxEi f; EE
EqEEE;=$E$+s
€++q+++f58f?. ,k (q
B -i E EE8636a2Ei;,r" :
tUo
g
!-c
bu,pc
-5 a o, .e
$g= sEsEs==teg E
!gEgFgEiEIEEgt'-g
llrrrrlr!.rrrtrrrr
9 = N (O t rJ) (g l\ @ O) O r N (r, $ to (gp. O O O O O O O O O,!- !F t- !F rr-,F .r EE$lggEEg;gEE;r.l'.rrllF 9 gtr o x'tr
iE;EEgE
Eg885EE
E..ll.lo-<d)()OTU I
5c--o
Fp
s!EU,CIJg ,5 63ri F F BIE EOEE
g fi
=5=5EFOa..rr(J-(\(e!tO
p
rF -98 f;
t s s s E st s !
.Otr.arrll
=<ctoou,ruo
i
frlFIolzl
AL5statr u{ ff9E]E382=-alIJ Jo. ll.JFC)l-OZ= z fHsI
jih
883
.F
l-.t
8Ho
-F
lll
E
otr
llJF
=u-o
F
9,o
o
otr
tr
ozoo
IIJa
o
otr
t
=-u
o-
juJ
f=LJ :-
11F
juJJF
83 e
IUo
o
UJ
ocozo
z
urSItt :-
A<Ern
=oBi5{
=
66 u3 32*I6s=3ir*EtrO9r,r=Bi
G 31r=e
f6r'lrnz
o-l-(J
UJtn
0c1!F
=
(9-zo
o
F{
z
3 r-'{sf
E.ozo
z
U
o
G,zo
z
Uooo
3o
=rn
sl'rn
F{
rn
Nr{
OrnNoN
(O
sl'rtrlN
cn
Ol 13903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

APPENDIX t)

COMPLETED

CALIFORNIA MUTCD
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WORKSHEETS:

WILDWOOD CANYON ROAD AT CANYON DRIVE
14003/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Califomin MUTCD 2014 Fdition
(FHWA'S MUTCD 2ff)t) Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as anrended for use in Cllitbrnia)

Flgure 4C-101 (CA), Trafflc Slgna I Warranls Worksheet (Sheet I of 5) COUNT DATE (c 3
CALC
CHK
DATE

OATEDIST CO RTE PM
Malor St:

Minor St:
wA Caa n q,a Critical Approach Speed
Critical Approach Speed
?"*ea. 45 mph
mph
Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic > 40 mph. ln built up area of isolated community of )Hour
Combination of Conditions A & B SATISFIED YES D NO {

REQUIREMENT CONDITION '/FULFILLED

TWO CONDITIONS
SATISFIED 800/o
A MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME Yestr NodAND,
B. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC

ANO,AN ADEQUATE TRIAL OF OTHER ALTERNATIVES THAT COULD

CAUSE LESS DELAY AND INCONVENIENCE TO TRAFFIC HAS FAILED

TO SOLVE THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS
Yestr NoD
The salisfaclion o, a traltic signal warrant or warrants shall nol in itself require the installation ol a lraffic control signal.

Cltirptcr 4C - Traftlc (lontrol Sigrurl Nccds Studies
[)lrl 4 - Ilighrvay Trlftic Signirls

MINIMUM REOUIREMENTS
(80% sHowN tN BRACKETS)
U U R

APPROACH
LANES 1 2 or More
5*OetBoth Approaches
Major Street
500
(400)
1350 \
keao/
600
(480)
420
(s36)ZoC 37e 4n 4b4 4tt 31 I
Highesl Approach
Minor Street
150
(t20)
/fu5
(84 )
200
fi60)
t40
(r12)+1 I -7 +6 lo

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(80% sHowN tN BRACKETS)
(,U U R

APPROACH
LANES 1 -^.2 or More
<525
ld?o\t
Both Approaches
Maior Strcet
750
(600)
900
(7201
630
(s04)3n 3dl 31fl fn 4Gl 4tt 31 t
Hrghest Approach
Minor Stieet
75 (60)
53 u2l
r r00
(80)
70 (56)5 +1 I 1 4 6 lo
Ntrt'e rrrbcr 7,201,1
a
/Av)
t6)t
14103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FllWA's MUTCD 2ffi9 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, ns arncndcd for usc in Cllifornia) Flgure 4C-101 (CA). Trafllc Signal Warrants Worksheet (Sheet 2 ot 5) WARRANT 2 - Four Hour Vehlcular Volume
Record hourly vehicular volumes for any four hours ol an SATISFIED'YES D NO {

APPROACH LANES
2or
More

U
378 +71 qn AIBoth Approaches - Major Street ,/
,/I 1 b loHigher Approach - Minor Street
YesD NoD'All plotted points fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1. (URBAN AREAS) Yes tr No [yQB, An ptotted points fatt above the applicable curve ln Fieure 4c-2.[RuRAr-nnees-i) SATISFIED YES tr NO
SATISFIED YES tr NO D
{WARRANT3-PeakHour
(Part A oll.rt ! must be satlsfied)
PART A
N/A (Ail
one
parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satlsfied for the same
hour, for any four consecutlve 1S-mlnute perlods)
PART B SATISFIED YES tr NO {

APPROACH LANES
2or
^
Hour
The satisfaclion of a lraffic signal warranl or warrants shall not in ilself require lhe inslallation of a lraffic conlrol signal.

Chirptcr 4C - Traftlc Control Sigrrnl Nceds Sttrdies
Part 4 - Highrvay Trlftlc Signlls

1. The lotal delay experienced by lraflic on one minor slreel approach (one direclion only) conlrolled bv b STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle.hours for a one-lane approach, or frve vehicle-hours for a hvo-lano approach; ANQ

2. The volume on lhe same minor streel approach (one direclion only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of lraflic or ,l50 vph for two moving lanes;ANQ

3. The totel entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for lntersections ivith four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three aogrcaches.

Yes E] No D
Yes tr No
YesD NoD
555Both Approaches - Major Street ,/
,/IHigher Approach - Minor Street
Yestr NoDThe plotted polnl falls above the applicable curve in Flgure 4C-3. (URBAN AREAS) Yestr NodOB, Ihe plolted point lalls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-4. (RURAL AREAS) Novcrnbcr 7, 20l4
\
14203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Culifornia MUTCD 2014 Fdition
(FllWA's MUTCD 2fi)9 Edition, including Rcvisiotts I & 2. ls anrcndt'd firr use in Califomia)

Figure 4C-1 . Wa rrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume
500
400
MINOR
STREET 3oo
HIGHER.

VOLUME
APPROACH - 200
VPH
r00 It5'
80'
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 r t00 1200 t300 1400
MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES_
vEHtcLES PER HOUR (VPH)
'Nols: I 15 vph applies as the lower lhreshold volume for a minor-streel approach with two or more lanes and 80 vph apflies as ltre lotuer lhreshold volume lor a ntlnor-slreel approach with one lane.

Figure 4C-2. Wa rrant 2, Four-Hour
(coHMUNlTy LESS THAN I 0,000 popuLATtoN
Vehicular Volume (70Y, Factor)
MINOR
STREET

HIGHER-
VOLUME

APPROACH -
VPH
400
300
200
t00
No
-
200 300 fiy +tr 600 70o 80o eooa
MAJOi SM EET_TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES_
3i I VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
'Nots: 8O vph applies as the lower threshold lolume lor a mlnor-slreel approach with trvo or more lanes and 60 vph applles as lhe lorver threshold volurns for a minor-streel approach wilh one tane. r 000
Clrlptcr 4C --Trafllc Control Signal Nccds Studics
Pnrt 4 - Highu,uy J'rlffic Signals
\a

I OR M(IRE LA
I
VES
I
tt
OB MORE LANES&2
I
\\\\,/
2 1
&t
&t
,NE
LANE\
\
\\
\
\/
\
I
z\
\\\\Y \\=.-
-
E]llq
ABoVE 40 ItrPH 0N MAJoB STREET)
20ROB LANES
\
\
2 OR MORE &l
\
,
ag 6
Not,errrbc r ? ,2014
-I
I MORT
.}---
LANE
I
MOBE
VE \
D
14303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(Fll\YA's MTJTCD 2fi)9 lldition, including Rcvisions I & 2, as anrcnded firr usc in Califontia) Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
Pagc tl37
MINOR
STBEET
HIGHER.

VOLUME

APPROACH -
VPH
600
500
100
300
200
t00
I
\\
\
\
\-\
\
L.
_/,2 OR MORI
I
LANI S&2ORM
I
)BE LANES
I\\\
\\\
\
2 OR MORE LANES & I LANtrrll/\
IE
\\\
\\\
\<f,'i,LANE\./L
E-
- I
I 50'
t00'
10O 50O 600 700 800 90O l0O0 lt00 1200 1300 l.l00 t50O t60O t70O t800 MAJOR STREET_TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES--
VEHToLES PER HOUR (VPH)
'Nole: 150 vph applies as lhe lorer thresholtl rrolume lor a minor-streel approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph apdles as lhe lourer threshold volume for a minor-slreet approach with one lane.

Figure 4C-4. Wa rrant 3,Peak Hour
(coMt\luNrTY LESS THAN I 0,000
400
MINOR
STREET 3oo
HIGHER.

VOLUME
APPROACH - 200
VPH
t00
Cltlptcr 4Cl -'l'ra[t-rc (]ontrol Sigrral Ncctls Studics Part 4 - Higltrvll''l'nrffic Signals
5o
300 400 soo 700 800 900 1000 I 100 1200 1300

MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-
VEHToLES PER HOUR (VPH)
'Nole: 100 vph applies as the lover lhreshold lolume lor a minor-street approach wlth tlo or nrore lanes and 75 vph applies as lhe lower lhreshold volume for a minor-slreet approach with one lane.

No
| 00'
75'
ABoVE 40 tttPH ON MAJoR STREET)
\IE LANI
i& 1LA {E
rs_
\\
\
\-
2 OR MORE I-ANES & 2 OR MOI<-t l,,of ,o,l ..o*,,\
\\&LANE
I
\
\-/
\\
t
L
L]-
Novcntbcr 7, 2014
\
=-
-
14403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Calilbrnia MUTCD 2014 Edirion
(l-"llWA's MITTCD 2fi)9 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as anre.nrlcd lbr use in Calitornia) Page tt43
Figure 4C-101 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheef (Sheet 3 of 5) WARRANT 4 - Pedestrian Volume
(Parts 1 1nd 3 Must Be Satisfied)
SATISFIED YES f] NO {
Part 1 (Parts A or B must be s s
A.Figure 4C-5 or Flgure 4C-6 .,

SATISFIED YES O NO V
rro)
B.Flgure 4C-T or Figure 4C-8 ./

SATISFIED YES D NO V
Part 2 SATISFIED YES {NO
N/
A WARRANT 5 - School Crosslng
l-+ (Parts A and B Must Be SatlsfiEd)
Part A
Gap/Mlnutes and # of Children

SATISFIED YES D NO D
SATISFIED YES tr NO D
Hour
Gaps 20/hr
YESD NOtr
YEStr NOtr
Part B SATISFIED YES D NO D
The distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 ft Yestr NoD
OR, The proposed signal rvill not restrict lhe progressive ntovement of traffic.Yestr Notr The satislaclion ol a lrafl'ic signal warranl or wanants shall nol in itself require the lnstallelion of a kaffic conlrol signal. (lhlptcr 4C - Truffic Cuntrol .Sigrral Necds .sturlics
Plrt 4 - Ilighn,ly Truftlc Siglrirls
Vehicles per hour for
any 4 hours z0t,yb a?4 3'lB
Pedeslrians per hour for
any 4 hours Z L o o
Vehicles per hour for
eny t hour 7$$e6 Tzto fie
Pedestrians per hou r lor
any t hour L \o o
$ND,^Ihe dislance to lhe nearesl traffic signal along the major slreet is greater than 300 ft Yes {No D
QB, The proposed traffic wtll not restrict progressive traffrc llow along tlre major street.YesW Notr Minutes Children Using Crossing
Mrnutes
Gaps
vs
Number ol Adequate Gaps
School Age Pcdestrians Crossirry Street / hr
AND, Consideration has been given lo less restrictive rentedial nreasures YesD NoD Not,crrtlxr 7, 20l.l
g
v
\
14503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Calikrrnia MUTCD 2014 Edition
([HWA's MUTCD 2fi)t) Edition, including Rcvisions I & 2, as anrcndcd l'or use in Culif<lmio) Figure 4C-5. Wa rrant 4, Pedestrian Four-Hour Volume
s00
400

TOTAL OF ALL
PEDESTRIANS 3oo

CROSSING
MAJOR STREEI:

PEDESTBIANS 2OO

PER HOUR (PPH)
t00

I 07'
300 400 s00 600 700 800 900 1000 I 100 1200 t300 1400

MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-
vEHtcLES PER HOUH (VPH)
'Note: 107 pph applies as the lotver threshold lolume.
\
\\
\\
\
-

TOTAL OF ALL

PEDESTRIANS

CROSSING
MAJOR STREET.

PEDESTRIANS

PEB HOUR (PPH)
('lruplcrl(l - J'raftlc Conlrol Sigrrul Ncctls .Sttttlic.s l)lrt 4 - l{igltrt'a1' l'rirfllc Signirls
Figure 4C-6. Wa rrant 4, Pedestrian Four'Hour
300 - ^r- 400 500 600 700 800 900
1'g ffion sTREET-TorAL oF BorH AppRoAcHEs-
VEHToLES PER HOUR (VPH)
'Note: 75 pph applies as lhe lower threshold rclume.
400
300
200
t00
Nl 0?
200
75'
I 000
(70% Factor)
\
\
\-
\\
\
-_
'1,, o ,L
=.-r
Not'ctttt,.-r 7, 20I4
14603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Calilbrnia MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2fi)9 Etlition. including Revisions I & 2, as arncnded for use in California)

Figure 4C-7. Wa rrant 4, Pedestrian Peak Hour

TOTAL OF ALL

PEDESTRIANS

CROSSING

MAJOR STREET-

PEDESTRIANS

PER HOUR (PPH)
700
600
500
400
300
200
r00
\\\
\\\,\\-\\\--\
r33
300 400 500 600 700 8@ 900 1000 r t00 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 t700 1800 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES_
VEHToLES PER HOUR (VPH)
'Nole: 133 pph applies as lhe loler threshold volume.

Figure 4C-8. Wa rrant 4, Pedestrian Peak Hou r (7oo/o Factor) s00
400

TOTAL OF ALL
PEDESTRIANS 3oo

CROSSING
MAJOR STREET.

PEDESTRIANS 2oo

PER HOUR (PPH)
r00 93'
20o :90 glw2g -ue.lon s00 600 700 800 900 t000 I 100

STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-
VEHToLES PER HOUR (VPH)
I 200
'Note: 93 pph applies as the loler lhreshold volume.

Clruptt:r 4C -'l'nrfl-rc Clorttrol Sigrral Ncetls Stutlics Part 4 - Highrvay Trirftrc .Signals
\\
\
\\
\\--\\L
l.o ?+^
Noverttbcr 7, 2014
Nt0z
14703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's tvlUTCD 2fi)9 Edition, including Rcvisions I & 2, ts lrncnded for usc in Crrlifomiir) Flgure 4C-l01 (CA). Traffic Slgnal Warrants Worksheet (Steet 1of 5) WARRANT 6 - Coordlnated Slgnal System
(All Parts Must Be Satisfied)
SATISFIED YES tr NO {

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL
NoEYesft,S fi, El6rmn, w-ftN: 1000 ft
Yes I
On a one.way streel or a slreel lhat has lraflic predominanlly in one direction, the adjacenl traffrc control-signals are so lar apart that lhey do nol provide lhe necessary degree of adlacent traffic control signals do
the proposed and adjacent traflic
not provide the necessary
control signals will collectively
galog1rnevehicular
Q-8, on a
degree of
provide a
SATISFIED YES tr NOWARRANT 7 - Crash ExPerience Warrant GI_Partq Must Be Satlsfled)
Adequale lrial ol allernalives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has falled lo reduce the crash frequency.

YesE NoD

REOUIREMENTS
5 OR MORE
Number of crashes reported rvilhin a 12 month period
susceptible to correction by a traffic signal, and lnvolving infury or damage oxceeding the reqttirements for a reportable crash.

L
YesE rlod
REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONS ,l
YesD Nod

ONE CONDITION
SATISFIED 800/o
Warranl 1, Condilion A -
Minimum Vehicular Volume
08, Warrartt 1, Condition B -
lnterruption ol Continuous Trafflc
QB, Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Condition
PCd Vol > 80% of Figure 4C-5 lhrough Figure 4C-B
SATISFIED YES tr NO {WARRANT I - Roadway Network
(All Parts Must Be Satisfied)

MINIMUM VOLUME

REOUIREMENTS ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES ,/FULFILLED 1000 Veh/Hr
During Typical Weekd ay Peak Hour
-Veh/Hr
and hbs S-year projected traffrc volumes that meet one or more of Warranti 1,2, and 3 during an average weekday.

OR
During Each of Any 5 Hrs. of a Sat. or Sun Veh/Hr
yes D ttoD
CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES [IA"JOR

ROUTE A
IIAJOR

ROUTE B
Hwy. Systenr Serving as Principal Network for Through Traffic Rural or
Suburba 'llEnyrJ Outside of ,j telgg.or Travers rlg lcg_ Appears as Major Route on an Offrcial Plan
Any Major Route Characteristics Met, Both Streets yes fl The salisfaction of a traflic signal warranl or warranls shall not in ilself require tha inslallalion of a lraflic conlrol signal Ohlptcr 4C - Traffic Clontrol Siglral Ncctls .Sttrtlics Part a - Higltrvuy Traftlc Sigrral.s
Novcrrtl>cr 7,2014
N l
_t_.---'
14803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's IVIUTCD 2ffi9 Edition, including Rcvisions I & 2. as anrended fur usc in Cnlifornia)

Flgure 4C.101 (CA). fraffic Slgnal Warrants Worksheet (Sheer S of 5) ilt WARRANT I - Intersection Near a Grade crossing
(Both Parts A and B Must Be Satisfied)

SATISFIED YES D NO D
The.minor streel approac! volume may be multiplied by up lo lhree following adjustment laclors (AF) as described in Section 4C.10.
1- Number of Rail Traffic per Adjustntent factor from table 4C-2-. 2- Percentage ol High-Occupancy Buses on Minor Slreet Approach_ Adjuslment faclor from table 4C.3_ 3- Percentage ol Tractor-Trailer Trucks on Minor Slreel Approach_ Adjuslment factor from table 4C-4_ NOTE: lf no dala is availale or knorwr, lhen use AF = 1 (no adjuslment) Chaptc'r 4(l - Trirffic Control Signal Ncr.ds Studic.s
[)lrt 4 - Highrval, Traftic .Siglrals
PART A
A grade crossing exists on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign and the center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop line or yield line on the approach. Track Center Line to Limit Line _ ft Yes E Nofl
PART B
Thele ls one mlnor strset approach lane at the track crosslng . During lhe highest lraffic volume hour during rvhich rail lraflic uses lhe crossing, lhe plotled point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9.

Major Street - Tolal of both agToaches: _ VPH
Minor Street - Crosses lhe lrack (one direction only, epproaching the interseclion):
_VPHxAF(UseTables4c.2,3,&4belolvtocalculateAF)=-VPH
QB, There are two or more mlnor street approach lanes at the track crosslng .

During the highest traffic volume hour during rvhich rail lraffic uses lhe crossing, the plottcd point falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-10.

Major Slreet - Total of both approaches : _ VpH
Minor Street - Crosses the lrack (one direction only, approaching the intersection):

VPHxAF(UseTables4c.2.3.&4belowtocalcualteAF)=-VPH
Yes I NoE
Nttvcntt,t-r 7, 2014
14903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

APPE,NDIX E

STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE AS A FUNCTION OF SPEED

CALIFORIYIA MUTCD
15003/11/2024 City Council Agenda

Road Type
Distance Between Signs**
A B c
Urban (leil.Fc*) - 25 or lgss"'100 Eet 100 bet 100 bet
Urban - more than 25 mph to 40 mph"'250 Eet 250 feet 250 feet Urban {Xgfcpcof}- more than 40 mph"'35O feet 350 bet 350 bet Rural 500 bet 5@ bet 500 het
Expressuay / Freoray 1,000 bet 1,500 bet 2,O40 bet
California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2. as amended fbr use in Califomia) Page I 032
Table 6C-1 . Recommended Advance Warning Sign tririnrnu Spacing .
" The column headings A. B, and C are the dimensions shown in F(lures 6H-1 hrough 6H-{6. The A dimensbn is the distance from the transiton or point of restriction to the fi]st sign. The B dimension ls the distance belrreen the tlrst and sGcond signs. The C dlmension is th€ distance betu,een thc sccond and Otird signs. (The "first sign" is the sign in a thre€-sign series that is dosest to tle TTC zone. The third sign" is the sign that is furlhest upsfeam from the TTC zone.) "' Posted speed limat, off-peak 8sth-percentrle speed prior to work starting, or other anticipated operating speed in mph.

Table 6C-2. Stopping Sight Distance as a Function of Speed on Level Roads. (Used as suggested longitudinal buffer space length or location for flagger station) Speed*Distance
20 mph 1 15 bet
25 mph 155 bet
30 mph 200 bet
35 mph 250 feet
40 mph 305 bet
45 mph 360 bet
50 mph 425 Eet
55 mph 495 Eet
60 mph 570 bet
65 mph 645 Eet
70 mph 730 Eet
75 mph 820 Eet
-/
' Posted speed
starting, or the
ofi-peak 8Sth-percentile speed prior to work
anticipated operating speed in mph
Table 6C-3. Taper Length Criteria for
Temporary Traffic Control Zones
Note. Use Table 6C-4 to calculate L
Chapter 6C - Temporary Traffic Control Elements
Part 6 - Temporary Traffic Control
Type of Taper Taper Length
Merging Taper at least L
Shitting Taper at least 0.5 L
Shoulder Taper at least 0.33 L
One-Lane. Two-Way Traffic Taper 50 feet mrnimum. 100 feet maximum Downstream Taper 50 feet minimum, 100 leet maximum
November 7, 2014
I
15103/11/2024 City Council Agenda

APPENDIX F

CALIFORNIA MUTCT)
MULTIWAY STOP APPLICATION GUIDE LINES :
15203/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I &2, as amended for use in Califomia)

Standard:
or Except as provided in Paragraphs 4 and 5, the minimum sizes for regulatory signs facing traffic on multi-lane conventional roads shall be as shown in the Multi-lane column of Table 2B-l and 2B-1(CA).

Option:
oc Where the posted speed limit is 35 mph or less on a multi-lane highway or street, other than for a STOP sign, the minimum size shown in the Single Lane column in Table 28-l and 2B-1(CA)may be used. os Where a regulatory sign, other than a STOP sign, is placed on the left-hand side of a multi-lane roadway in addition to the installation of the same regulatory sign on the right-hand side or the roadway, the size shown in the Single Lane column in Table 28- I and 2B-1(CA) may be used for both the sign on the right-hand side and the sign on the left-hand side of the roadway.

Standard:
oo A minimum size of 36 x 36 inches shall be used for STOP signs that face multi-lane approaches. o; Where side roads intersect a multi-lane street or highway that has a speed limit of 45 mph or higher, the minimum size of the STOP signs facing the side road approaches, even if the side road only has one approach lane, shall be 36 x 36 inches.
os Where side roads intersect a multi-lane street or highway that has a speed limit of 40 MPH or lower, the minimum size of the STOP signs facing the side road approaches shall be as shown in the Single Lane or Multi-lane columns of Table 2B-l and 2B-1(CA)based on the number of approach lanes on the side street approach.

Guidance:
os The minimum sizes for regulatory signs facing traffic on exit and entrance ramps should be as shown in tlrc column of Table 2B-l and 2B-1(CA) that corresponds to the mainline roadway classification (Expressway or Freeway). If a minimum size is not provided in the Freeway column, the minimum size in the Expressway column should be used. IJ'a minimum size is not provided in the Freeway or Expressway Column, the size in the Oversized column should be used.

Section 28,04 Rieht-of-Wav at Intersections
Support:
or State or local laws written in accordance with the "Uniform Vehicle Code" (see Section lA.l I ) establish the right-of-way rule at intersections having no regulatory traffic control signs such that the driver of a vehicle approaching an intersection must yield the righrof-way to any vehicle or pedestrian already in the intersection.

When two vehicles approach an intersection from different streets or highways at approximately the same time, the righrof-way rule requires the driver of the vehicle on the left to yield the right-of-way to the vehicle on the right.

The righrof-way can be modified at through streets or highways by placing YIELD (Rl -2) signs (see Sections 2B.08 and 28.09) or STOP (Rl-l) signs (see Sections 28.05 through 28.07) on one or more approaches.

Guidance:
oz Engineering judgment should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors should be considered:

A. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian trffic volumes on all approaches; B. Number and angle ofapproaches;
C. Approach speeds;
D. Sight distance available on each approach; and
E. Reported crash experience.
ot YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist:

A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law; B. A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or C. An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area.
uIn addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of nuo minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist:

Chapter 28 - Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates
Part 2 - Signs
November 7 ,2014
15303/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in Califomia)

A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection Jiom all approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day;
B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sfficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and/or C. Crash records indicate thatfive or more crashes that involve thefailure to yield the right-of-way at the intersection under the normal right-of-w'ay rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. osYIELD or STOP signs should not be usedfor speed control.

Support:
oo Section 28.07 contains provisions regarding the application of multi-way STOP control at an intersection.

Guidance:
ot Once the decision has been made to control an intersection, the decision regarding the appropriate roadway to control should be based on engineering judgment. In most cases, the roadway carrying the lowest volume of trdfic should be controlled.
os A YIELD or STOP sign should not be installed on the higher volume roadway unless justified by an engineering study.

Support:
osThe following are considerations that might influence the decision regarding the appropriate roadway upon which to install a YIELD or STOP sign where two roadways with relatively equal volumes and/or characteristics intersect:

A. Controlling the direction that conflicts the most with established pedestrian crossing activity or school walking routes;
B. Controlling the direction that has obscured vision, dips, or bumps that already require drivers to use lower operating speeds; and
C. Controlling the direction that has the best sight distance from a controlled position to observe conflicting traffic.

Standard:
ro Because the potential for conflicting commands could create driver confusion, YIELD or STOP signs shallnotbeusedinconjunctionwithanytrafficcontrolsignaloperation.,@ si
eengiet+xietc.;+r
C. If a ehennelizeC turn lene is separeted frem thc oCjoeent travel lones by on islond end the ehonnelized roa STOP signs shall not be erected at any entrance to an intersection controlled by traffic signals. Refer to CVC 21355(a).

Option:
roo YIELD or STOP signs may be used at a channelized turn lane if it is separated from the adjacent travel lanes moving in same direction by an island and the channelized turn lane is not controlled by a traffic control signal.

Standard:
rr Except as provided in Section 28.09, STOP signs and YIELD signs shall not be installed on different approaches to the same unsignalized intersection if those approaches conflict with or oppose each other. ru Portable or part-time STOP or YIELD signs shall not be used except for emergency and temporary traflic control zone purposes.
n A portable or part-time (folding) STOP sign that is manually placed into view and manually removed from view shal! not be used during a power outage to control a signalized approach unless the maintaining agency establishes that the signal indication that will first be displayed to that approach upon restoration of power is a flashing red signal indication and that the portable STOP sign will be manually removed from view prior to stop-and-go operation of the traffic control signal.

Chapter 28 - Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates
Part 2 - Signs
November 7 ,2014
15403/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in Califomia) Page I 28
Option:
r+ A portable or part-time (folding) STOP sign that is electrically or mechanically operated such that it only displays the STOP message during a power outage and ceases to display the STOP message upon restoration of power may be used during a power outage to control a signalized approach.

Support:
rs Section 98.03 contains provisions regarding the assignment of priority at a shared-use path/ roadway intersection.

Section 28.05 STOP Siqn (Rl-l) and ALL WAY Plaque (Rl-3P) Standard:
or When it is determined that a full stop is always required on an approach to an intersection, a STOP (Rl- l) sign (see Figure 2B-l) shall be used.
oz The STOP sign shall be an octagon with a white legend and border on a red background. or Secondary legends shall not be used on STOP sign faces. orAt intersections where all approaches are controlled by STOP signs (see Section 28.07), an ALL WAY supplemental plaque (Rl-3P) shall be mounted below each STOP sign. The ALL WAY plaque (see Figure 2B-l) shall have a white legend and border on a red background. os The ALL WAY plaque shall only be used if all intersection approaches are controlled by STOP signs. oo Supplemental plaques with legends such as 2-WAY, 3-WAY, 4-WAY, or other numbers of ways shall not be used with STOP signs.

Support:
oz The use of the CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP (W4-4P) plaque (and other plaques with variations of this word message) is described in Section 2C.59.

Guidance:
o* Plaques wilh the appropriate alternative messages of TRAFFIC FROM LEFT @GHD DOES NOT STOP (lY4-4aP) or ONCOMING TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP (W4-4bP) should be used at intersections where STOP signs control all but one approach to the intersection, unless the only non-stopped approach is from a one-wqy street.

Option:
osAn EXCEPT RIGHT TURN (Rl-l0P) plaque (see Figure 2B-l) may be mounted below the STOP sign if an engineering study determines that a special combination of geometry and traffic volumes is present that makes it possible for right-turning traffic on the approach to be permitted to enter the intersection without stopping.

Support:
ro The design and application of Stop Beacons are described in Section 4L.05. r r A STOP (R1-1 ) sign is not a 'cure-all" and is not a substitute for other traffic control devices. Often, the need for a STOP (R1-1) sign can be eliminated if the sight distance is increased by removing obstructions.

Throuqh Hiqhwavs
Option:
rz STOP (R1-1 ) signs may be installed either at or near the entrance to a State highway, except at signalized intersections, or at any location so as to control trafflc within an intersection. Refer to CVC 21352and 21355, See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.

Support:
r: When STOP (R1-1) signs or traffic control signals have been erected at all entrances, a highway constitutes a through highway. Refer to CVC 600,
r Authority to place STOP (R1-1) signs facing State highway traffic is delegated to the Caltrans District Directors. 0ption:
rs Local authorities may designate any highway under their jurisdiction as a through highway and install STOP (R1-1) signs in a like manner. Refer to CVC 21354.

Standard:
ro No local authority shall erect or maintain any STOP (Rl-1) sign or other traffic control device requiring a stop, on any State highway, except by permission of Galtrans. Refer to CVC 21353.

Chapter 28 - Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7 ,2014 Part 2 - Signs 15503/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in Califomia)

Support:
rz Caltrans will grant such permission only when an investigation indicates that the ST0P (R1-1) sign will benefit traffic.

Section 28.06 STOP Sien Applications
Guidance:
or At intersections where afull stop is not necessary at all times, consideration shouldfirst be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs (see Sections 28.08 and 28.09). oz The use of STOP signs on the minor-street approaches should be considered d engineering judgment indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of thefollowing conditions:

A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day; B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting trffic on the through street or highway; and/or
C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction by the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a l2-month period, or thatfive or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Such crashes include rightangle collisions involving road users on the minor-street approachfailing to yield the right-of-way to tralfic on the through street or highway.

Support:
or The use of STOP signs at grade crossings is described in Sections 88.04 and 8B.05.

Section 28.07 Multi-Wav Annlications
Support:
or Multi-way stop control can be useful as a safety measure at intersections if certain traflic conditions exist.

Safety concerns associated with multi-way stops include pedestrians, bicyclists, and all road users expecting other road users to stop. Multi-way stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal.
oz The restrictions on the use of STOP signs described in Section 28.04 also apply to multi-way stop applications.

Guidance:
ot The decision to install multi-way stop control should be based on an engineering study. u The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation:

A. Llthere trffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control trafic while arrangements are being madefor the installation of the trafrc control signal.

B. Five or more reported crashes in a l2-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.

C. Minimum volumes:

I . The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300vehicles per hourfor any 8 hours ofan average day; and

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersectionfrom the minor street approaches (total ofboth approaches) averages at least 200 units per hourfor the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular tralfic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but

3. If the 81rh-percentile approach speed of the major-street trffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in ltems I and 2.

D. l{here no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.l, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excludedfrom this condition.

Option:
os Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include:

A. The need to control left-turn conflicts;
B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and Chapter 2B - Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates
Part 2 - Signs
November 7, 2014
15603/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California) Page I 30
D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.

Section 28.08 YIELD Sien (Rl-2)
Standard:
or The YIELD (Rl-2) sign (see Figure 2B-l) shall be a downward-pointing equilateral triangle with a wide red border and the legend YIELD in red on a white background.

Support:
oz The YIELD sign assigns right-of-way to traffic on certain approaches to an intersection. Vehicles controlled by a YIELD sign need to slow down to a speed that is reasonable for the existing conditions or stop when necessary to avoid interfering with conflicting traffic.

Section 28.09 YIELD Sisn Applications
Option:
or YIELD signs may be installed:

A. On the approaches to a through street or highway where conditions are such that a full stop is not always required.

B. At the second crossroad of a divided highway, where the median width at the intersection is 30 feet or greater.

In this case, a STOP or YIELD sign may be installed at the entrance to the first roadway of a divided highway, and a YIELD sign may be installed at the entrance to the second roadway.

C. For a channelized tum lane that is separated from the adjacent travel lanes by an island, even ifthe adjacent lanes at the intersection are controlled by a highway traffic control signal or by a STOP sign.

D. At an intersection where a special problem exists and where engineering judgment indicates the problem to be susceptible to correction by the use of the YIELD sign.

E. Facing the entering roadway for a merge-type movement if engineering judgment indicates that control is needed because acceleration geometry and/or sight distance is not adequate for merging traffic operation.

Standard:
oz A YIELD (Rl-2) sign shall be used to assign right-of-way at the entrance to a roundabout. YIELD signs at roundabouts shall be used to control the approach roadways and shall not be used to control the circulatory roadway.
or Other than for all of the approaches to a roundabout, YIELD signs shall not be placed on all of the approaches to an intersection.

Section 28.10 STOP Sien or YIELD Sien Placement
Standard:
or The STOP or YIELD sign shall be installed on the near side of the intersection on the right-hand side of the approach to which it applies. When the STOP or YIELD sign is installed at this required location and the sign visibility is restricted, a Stop Ahead sign (see Section 2C.36) shall be installed in advance of the STOP sign or a Yield Ahead sign (see Section 2C.36\ shall be installed in advance of the YIELD sign. oz The STOP or YIELD sign shall be located as close as practical to the intersection it regulates, while optimizing its visibility to the road user it is intended to regulate. oz YIELD signs shall not be erected upon the approaches to more than one of the intersecting streets. Refer to CVC 21 356.
o: STOP signs and YIELD signs shall not be mounted on the same post. oq No items other than inventory stickers, sign installation dates, and bar codes shall be affixed to the fronts of STOP or YIELD signs, and the placement of these items shall be in the border of the sign. os No items other than official traffic control signs, inventory stickers, sign installation dates, anti- vandalism stickers, and bar codes shall be mounted on the backs of STOP or YIELD signs. oo No items other than retroreflective strips (see Section 2{.2ll or official traffic control signs shall be mounted on the fronts or backs of STOP or YIELD signs supports.

Chapter 28 - Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates
Part 2 - Signs
November 7, 2014
15703/11/2024 City Council Agenda

APPENDIX G

CALIFORNIA MUTCT)
I AI-ROAD WAY LIGHT^S GUIDE LI]YES :
15803/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in California)

CHAPTER 4N. IN.ROADWAY LIGHTS
Section 4N.01 Application of In-Roadwav Liehts
Support:
or In-Roadway Lights are special types of highway traffic signals installed in the roadway surface to warn road users that they are approaching a condition on or adjacent to the roadway that might not be readily apparent and might require the road users to slow down and/or come to a stop. This includes situations warning of marked school crosswalks, marked midblock crosswalks, marked crosswalks on uncontrolled approaches, marked crosswalks in advance of roundabouts as described in Chapter 3C, and other roadway situations involving pedestrian crossings.

Standard:
oz In-Roadway Lights shall not be used for any application that is not described in this Chapter. or If used, In-Roadway Lights shall not exceed a height of 3/4 inch above the roadway surface. o+ When used, In-Roadway Lights shall be flashed and shall not be steadily illuminated.

Support:
os Steadily illuminated lights installed in the roadway surface are considered to be internally illuminated raised pavement markers (see Section 3B.l I ).

Option:
oo In-Roadway Lights may be flashed in a manner that includes a continuous flash of varying intensity and time duration that is repeated to provide a flickering effect (see Section 4N.02).

Section 4N.02 In-Roadway Warnine Liehts at Crosswalks
Option:
or In-roadway lights may be installed at certain marked crosswalks, based on an engineering study or engineering judgment, to provide additional warning to road users.

Standard:
oz If used, In-Roadway Warning Lights at crosswalks shall be installed only at marked crosswalks with applicable warning signs. They shall not be used at crosswalks controlled by YIELD signs, STOP signs, or traffic control signals.
o.r lf In-Roadway Warning Lights are used at a crosswalk, the following requirements shall apply:

A. Except as provided in Paragraphs 7 and 8, they shall be installed along both sides of the crosswalk and shall span its entire length.

B. They shall initiate operation based on pedestrian actuation and shall cease operation at a predetermined time after the pedestrian actuation or, with passive detection, after the pedestrian clears the crosswalk.

C. They shall display a flashing yellow light when actuated. The flash rate shall be at least 50, but no more than 60, flash periods per minute. If they are flashed in a manner that includes a continuous flash of varying intensity and time duration that is repeated to provide a flickering effect, the flickers or pulses shall not repeat at a rate that is between 5 and 30 per second to avoid frequencies that might cause seizures.

D. They shall be installed in the area between the outside edge of the crosswalk line and l0 feet from the outside edge of the crosswalk.

E. They shall face away from the crosswalk if unidirectional, or shall face away from and across the crosswalk if bidirectional.
oq If used on one-lane, one-way roadways, a minimum of two In-Roadway Warning Lights shall be installed on the approach side of the crosswalk. If used on two-lane roadways, a minimum of three In- Roadway Warning Lights shall be installed along both sides of the crosswalk. If used on roadways with more than two lanes, a minimum of one In-Roadway Warning Light per lane shall be installed along both sides of the crosswalk.

Chapter 4N - [n-Roadway Lights
Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals
November 7, 2011
15903/11/2024 City Council Agenda

California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use in Califomia)