Yucaipa City Council
August 26, 2024

EIR must be prepared to include all truck/trailer/delivery van activity for quantified VMT analysis.

The operational nature of industrial/warehouse uses involves high rates of truck/trailer/delivery van VMT due to traveling from large import hubs to regional distribution centers to smaller industrial parks and then to their final delivery destinations. Once employees arrive at the proposed project for work, they will conduct their jobs by driving truck/trailer/delivery vans across the region as part of the daily operations as a warehouse, which will drastically increase project - generated VMT. The project's truck/trailer and delivery van activity is unable to utilize public transit or active transportation and it is misleading to the public and decision makers to exclude this activity from VMT analysis. A revised EIR must be prepared to reflect a quantified VMT analysis that includes all truck/trailer and delivery van activity.

The EIR has not adequately analyzed the project's potential to substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses; or the project's potential to result in inadequate emergency access. There are no exhibits adequately depicting the available maneuvering and queueing space for trucks/trailers at the intersection of the project driveways and the adjacent streets. There are also no exhibits adequately depicting the onsite turning radius available for trucks maneuvering throughout the site. Notably, several areas for conflicts between passenger cars and trucks/trailers exist throughout the entirety of the proposed amendment to the FCSP and at the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center. For example, Figure 3-12 - Pacific Oaks Commerce Center Site Plan depicts the truck/trailer parking stalls on the west side of Building 2 in a tandem configuration within the truck/trailer loading dock court.

These parking stalls may be in use at any time and restrict movement on the site during maneuvering, particularly to accommodate the tandem configuration. The same is true for the the truck/trailer parking stalls on the north and south sides of Building 1 and the additional truck/trailer parking lot site to the west of Building 2, which includes parking stalls in both tandem and triple tandem configurations.

Additionally, the EIR has not provided any analysis of the available horizontal and vertical sight distance at the intersection of the project driveways and adjacent streets. Sight distance is the continuous length of street ahead visible to the driver. At unsignalized intersections, corner sight distance must provide a substantially clear line of sight between the driver of the vehicle waiting on the minor road (driveway) and the driver of an approaching vehicle. A revised EIR must be prepared with this analysis based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Stopping Sight Distance requirements.

7.0 Alternatives
The EIR is required to evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project which will avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project (CEQA § 15126.6.)

Benjamin Matlock
March 25, 2024

The alternatives chosen for analysis include the No Project (Approved Project) Alternative (existing FCSP alternative), Reduced Warehousing Intensity Alternative, and the Increased Open Space —Conservation Alternative. The EIR does not evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives as only two alternatives beyond the required No Project alternative are analyzed. The EIR does not include an alternative that meets the project objectives and also eliminates all of the project's significant and unavoidable impacts. The EIR must be revised to include analysis of a reasonable range of alternatives and foster informed decision making (CEQA § 15126.6). This could include alternatives such as development of the site with a project that reduces all of the proposed project's significant and unavoidable impacts to less than significant level, and/or a mixed -use project that provides affordable housing and exclusively local -serving commercial uses that may reduce VMT, GHG emissions, and improve Air Quality.

9.0 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes due to the Proposed Project and 10.0 Growth Inducing Impacts of the Proposed Project
A revised EIR must be prepared to include an accurate cumulative analysis discussion here to demonstrate the impact of the proposed project in a cumulative setting. The EIR does not include any information regarding the buildout conditions of the City's-General Plan in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis. The EIR must be revised to provide the horizon year of the City's current adopted General Plan, the total developable building floor area analyzed within the Industrial land use designation, and cumulative development since adoption of the General Plan to ensure that the proposed project is within the General Plan EIR's analysis, particularly since the EIR tiers from the General Plan EIR. For example, Table CDL-2: Yucaipa Buildout Summary of the General Plan indicates that the entirety of all Industrial land use designations will accommodate 1,100,000 square feet of building area. The proposed project's 3,992,503 square feet of Business Park (industrial) building area exceeds the entirety of the planned industrial growth for the entire incorporated City area by nearly four times. Table CDL- 2 also states the the entirety of all Industrial land use designations will generate 1,203 jobs, and the proposed project's 2,682 jobs is more than twice the identified growth. The growth generated by the proposed project was not accounted for by the General Plan or its EIR as the project requires a GPA to proceed. The growth generated by the proposed project was not anticipated by the City's General Plan, RTP/SCS, or AQMP. A revised EIR must be prepared with a finding of significance.

The EIR does not discuss its own conclusion that implementation of the proposed project and required GPA will result in significant and unavoidable cumulatively considerable Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Noise impacts. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance due to the project's significant and unavoidable Greenhouse Gas Emissions (cumulatively considerable), and Noise impacts and direct contribution to climate change.

Benjamin Matlock
March 25, 2024

The EIR does not adequately discuss or and analyze the commitment of resources is not consistent with regional and local growth forecasts (AQMP, General Plan, SCAG, etc) and does not address the EIR's own conclusion that the project will result in impacts (Air Quality, GHG) that exceed with the forecasts of the applicable plans (AQMP, 2030/2050 GHG reduction goals). As noted throughout this comment letter, the project represents a significant amount of growth in the City and exceeds the developable Industrial building area anticipated by General Plan buildout and exceeds the City's employment growth forecast for a 29 year period. This is especially notable as the project requires a GPA to proceed, indicating the proposed project was not anticipated in any General Plan buildout projection or SCAG growth forecast. The EIR has not provided an adequate or accurate cumulative analysis discussion here to demonstrate the impact of the proposed project in a cumulative setting. For example, the project represents 39% of the City's job growth over 29 years. This number increases exponentially when the City's other industrial and commercial development activity is added to the calculation. A revised EIR must be prepared to include an accurate cumulative analysis on this topic and include a finding of significance.

Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, GSEJA believes the EIR is flawed and a revised EIR must be prepared for the proposed project and recirculated for public review. Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.

Sincerely,
Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
Attachments:

1. SWAPE Technical Analysis

SWAPE
Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
Litigation Support for the Environment
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
March 20, 2024
Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
707 Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 4880
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Subject: Comments on the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Project (SCH No. 2006041096) Dear Mr. Ho,
We have reviewed the February 2024 Subsequent Environmental Impact Report ("SEIR") for the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Project ("Project") located in the City of Yucaipa ("City"). The Project proposes to construct 2,472 residential units and 5,093,265-square-feet ("SF") of nonresidential uses on the 1,238-acre site.

Our review concludes that the SEIR fails to adequately evaluate the Project's air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project may be underestimated and inadequately addressed. A revised Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts that the project may have on the environment.

Air Quality
Failure to Implement All Feasible Mitigation to Reduce Emissions The SEIR estimates that the Project's construction -related and operational emissions would exceed the applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District ("SCAQMD") thresholds. Specifically, regarding the Project's construction -related impacts, the SEIR states:
"Construction of the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center would exceed the South Coast AQMD regional significance thresholds. As shown in Table 5.3-23 above, implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-6 would reduce VOC emissions to below the regional significance threshold.

However, construction activities associated with the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center would

continue to generate NOX and CO emissions that exceed the respective South Coast AQMD regional significance thresholds. Therefore, Impact 5.3-2 as it pertains to the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center project would be significant and unavoidable" (p. 5.3-68) Furthermore, regarding the Project's operational impacts, the SEIR states:
"Long-term operation of the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center project would exceed the South Coast AQMD regional significance thresholds. Table 5.3-25, Pacific Oaks Commerce Center Maximum Daily Regional Operational Emissions: With Mitigation, shows the maximum daily operational phase emissions with implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-2 and AQ-4, and AQ-7 through AQ-11. As shown in the table, though mitigation would reduce emissions, the regional significance thresholds for VOC and NOX would still be exceeded. Impact 5.3-3 would be significant and unavoidable for the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center project" (p. 5.3-69) As discussed, the SEIR concludes that the criteria air pollutant impacts associated with both construction and operation of the Project would be significant -and -unavoidable. While we agree that the Project would result in significant air quality impacts, the SEIR's assertion that this impact is significant -and - unavoidable is unreliable. According to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Guidelines § 15096(g)(2):
"When an updated EIR has been prepared for a project, the Responsible Agency shall not approve the project as proposed if the agency finds any feasible alternative or feasible mitigation measures within its powers that would substantially lessen or avoid any significant effect the project would have on the environment."
The SEIR is required under CEQA to implement all feasible mitigation to reduce impacts to the maximum extent feasible. While the SEIR implements Mitigation Measure ("MM") AQ-1 through MM-AQ-11, the SEIR fails to implement all feasible mitigation (p. 1-28 —1-32, Table ES-5). Therefore, the SEIR's conclusion that Project's air quality emissions would be significant -and -unavoidable may be unsubstantiated. To reduce the Project's air quality impacts to the maximum extent possible, additional feasible mitigation measures should be incorporated, such as those suggested in the section of this letter titled "Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions." The Project should not be approved until a revised EIR is prepared, incorporating all feasible mitigation to reduce emissions to the maximum extent feasible.

Disproportionate Health Risk Impacts of Warehouses on Surrounding Communities Upon review of the SEIR and associated documents, we have determined that the development of the proposed Project may contribute to disproportionate health risk impacts on community members living, working, and going to school within the immediate area of the Project site. According to SCAQMD:
2 "Those living within a half mile of warehouses are more likely to include communities of color, have health impacts such as higher rates of asthma and heart attacks, and a greater environmental burden."'
in particular, the SCAQMD found that more than 2.4 million people live within a half mile radius of at least one warehouse, and that those areas not only experience increased rates of asthma and heart attacks, but are also disproportionately Black and Latino communities below the poverty Tine.' Another study similarly indicates that "neighborhoods with lower household income levels and higher percentages of minorities are expected to have higher probabilities of containing warehousing facilities."3 Additionally, a report authored by the Inland Empire -based People's Collective for Environmental Justice and University of Redlands states:
"As the warehouse and logistics industry continues to grow and net exponential profits at record rates, more warehouse projects are being approved and constructed in low-income communities of color and serving as a massive source of pollution by attracting thousands of polluting truck trips daily. Diesel trucks emit dangerous levels of nitrogen oxide and particulate matter that cause devastating health impacts including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cancer, and premature death. As a result, physicians consider these pollution - burdened areas 'diesel death zones.'"
It is evident that the continued development of industrial warehouses within these communities poses a significant environmental justice challenge. However, the acceleration of warehouse development is only increasing despite the consequences on public health.

In April 2022, the American Lung Association ranked San Bernadino County as the worst for ozone pollution in the nations This year, the County continues to face the worst ozone pollution, as it has seen the highest recorded Air Quality Index ("AQI") values for ground -level ozone in California.' The U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") indicates that ozone, the main ingredient in "smog," can cause 1 "South Coast AQMD Governing Board Adopts Warehouse Indirect Source Rule." SCAQMD, May 2021, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/dots/default-source/news-archive/2021/board-adopts-waist-may7-2021.pdf?sfvrsn=9 . 2 "Southern California warehouse boom a huge source of pollution. Regulators are fighting back." Los Angeles Times, May 2021, available at: https://www,latimes,com/california/story/2021-05-05/air-quality-officials-target- warehouses-bid-to-curb-health-damaging-truck-pollution. 3 "Location of warehouses and environmental justice: Evidence from four metros in California." Metro Freight Center of Excellence, January 2018, available at:
https://www.metrans.org/assets/research/MF%201.1g Location%20of%2owarehouses%20and%20environmental %20iustice Final%20Report 021618.pdf, p. 21.
° "Warehouses, Pollution, and Social Disparities: An analytical view of the logistics industry's impacts on environmental justice communities across Southern California." People's Collective for Environmental Justice, April 2021, available at:
https://earthjustice.org/sites/default/files/files/warehouse research report 4.15.2021.pdf, p. 4. 5 "State of the Air 2022." American Lung Association, April 2022, available at:
https://www.l ung.org/research/sota/key-findings/most-polluted-places. 6 "High Ozone Days." American Lung Association, 2022, available at:
https://www.l ung.orgJresearch/sota/city-ran kings/states/california. 3 several health problems, which includes aggravating lung diseases and increasing the frequency of asthma attacks. The U.S. EPA states:
"Children are at greatest risk from exposure to ozone because their lungs are still developing and they are more likely to be active outdoors when ozone levels are high, which increases their exposure. Children are also more likely than adults to have asthma."' Furthermore, regarding the increased sensitivity of early -life exposures to inhaled pollutants, the CARB states:
"Children are often at greater risk from inhaled pollutants, due to the following reasons:
• Children have unique activity patterns and behavior. For example, they crawl and play on the ground, amidst dirt and dust that may carry a wide variety of toxicants. They often put their hands, toys, and other items into their mouths, ingesting harmful substances. Compared to adults, children typically spend more time outdoors and are more physically active. Time outdoors coupled with faster breathing during exercise increases children's relative exposure to air pollution. • Children are physiologically unique. Relative to body size, children eat, breathe, and drink more than adults, and their natural biological defenses are less developed. The protective barrier surrounding the brain is not fully developed, and children's nasal passages aren't as effective at filtering out pollutants. Developing lungs, immune, and metabolic systems are also at risk.
• Children are particularly susceptible during development. Environmental exposures during fetal development, the first few years of life, and puberty have the greatest potential to influence later growth and development."'
A Stanford -led study also reveals that children exposed to high levels of air pollution are more susceptible to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in adulthood.' Given that children are more susceptible to the negative health impacts of air pollutants, and that warehouses release more smog - forming pollution than any other sector, it is necessary to evaluate the specific health risk that warehouses pose to children in the nearby community.

According to the above -mentioned study by the People's Collective for Environmental Justice and University of Redlands, a half mile radius is commonly used for identifying sensitive receptors. There are 640 schools in the South Coast Air Basin that are located within half a mile of a large warehouse, most of "Health Effects of Ozone Pollution." U.S. EPA, May 2021, available at: https://www.epa.xov/ground-level-ozone- pollution/health-effects-ozone-pollution.
$ "Children and Air Pollution." California Air Resources Board (CARB), available at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/children-and-a ir-pollution. 9 "Air pollution puts children at higher risk of disease in adulthood, according to Stanford researchers and others." Stanford, February 2021, available at: https://news.stanford.edu/2021/02/22/air-pollution-impacts-childrens- health/.
4 them in socio-economically disadvantaged areas.10 According to the SEIR, Mesa View Middle School is located 0.27 miles south of the Project site (p. 5.9-12). The location of a school within half of a mile of the Project site poses a significant threat because, as outlined above, children are a vulnerable population that are more susceptible to the damaging side effects of air pollution. If approved, the Project would contribute to the detrimental short-term and long-term health impacts that warehouses pose on local children.

A revised EIR should be prepared to evaluate the contribution to the disproportionate impacts that warehouses pose on the community adjacent to the Project, including an analysis of the impact on children and people of color who live and attend school in the surrounding area. In order to evaluate the cumulative air quality impact from the several warehouse projects proposed or built in a one -mile radius of the Project site, the analysis should prepare a revised cumulative health risk assessment ("HRA") to quantify the adverse health outcome from the effects of exposure to multiple warehouses in the immediate area in conjunction with the poor ambient air quality in the Project's census tract. This recommendation is consistent with guidance provided by the California Department of Justice ("DOJ").11 Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The SEIR concludes that the proposed Project would result in a less -than -significant health risk impact based on a quantified construction and operational HRA, as detailed in the Health Risk Assessment Report ("HRA Report"), provided as Appendix D to the SEIR. Specifically, the SEIR estimates that the maximum cancer risk posed to nearby, existing residential sensitive receptors associated with construction and operation would be 4.4 in one million, which would not exceed the SCAQMD significance threshold of 10 in one million (see excerpt below) (p. 5.3-75, Table 5.3-29).

Table 5.3-29 Pacific Oaks Commerce Center Operation Plus Construction Health Risk Results: With Mitigation
Receptor
Cancer Risk
(per million)
Chronic Haard Index
Maximum Exposed Individual Resident — Connncten

0.8 0.003
Maximum Exposed Individual Re iden:—Operation

3.6 0.0008
Combined Total

4.4 0.0038
Current South Coast AND Project Threshold
10 iA
Souls Coast AQS'D Threshold
5 1.0
Exceeds Threshold?
No
No
SCUT e : /pperdn D. Hen:th R`sx tssessma:

However, the SEIR's evaluation of the Project's potential health risk impacts, as well as the subsequent less -than -significant impact conclusion, is incorrect. to "Warehouses, Pollution, and Social Disparities: An analytical view of the logistics industry's impacts on environmental justice communities across Southern California." People's Collective for Environmental Justice, April 2021, available at:
https://earthiustice.org/sites/default/files/files/warehouse research report 4.15.2021.pdf, p. 4. 11 "Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act." State of California Department of Justice, September 2022, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/warehouse-best-practices.pdf , p. 6. 5 The SEIR's operational HRA underestimates the Fraction of Time At Home ("FAH") values for the third trimester, infant, and child receptors. Specifically, the HRA Report utilizes an FAH value of 0.85 for the third trimester (age -0.25 to 0) and infant (age 0 to 2) receptors, and an FAH value of 0.72 for the child receptors (age 2 to 16) (see excerpt below) (Appendix D, p. D-20).

Age Groups BR/BBC' (L/lg-darl
ED _ASF FAH
Third trimester 361 0.25 10
0-2 age group 1,090 2 10
2-9 age group 861 7 3
2-16 age group 745 14 3
16-30 age group 335 14 1

0.85 0.85

0.i2

0.72 0.73
However, the FAH values used for the third trimester, infant, and childhood receptors are incorrect, as SCAQMD guidance clearly states:
"For Tiers 1, 2, and 3 screening purposes, the FAH is assumed to be 1 for ages third trimester to

16. As a default, children are assumed to attend a daycare or school in close proximity to their home and no discount should be taken for time spent outside of the area affected by the facility's emissions. People older than age 16 are assumed to spend only 73 percent of their time at home."12
Per SCAQMD guidance, the HRA Report should have used an FAH of 1 for the third trimester, infant, and child receptors. By relying on incorrect FAH values, the SEIR underestimates the cancer risk posed to nearby, existing sensitive receptors as a result of Project operation. As such, the Project's HRA cannot be relied upon until the necessary changes are made in accordance with SCAQMD guidance.

Greenhouse Gas
Failure to Adequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Impacts
The SEIR estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 48,775 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year ("MT CO2e/year"), which would exceed the no -net -increase threshold (0 MTCO2e/year) for GHG emissions (see excerpt below) (p. 5.8-32, Table 5.8-8). iz "Risk Assessment Procedures." SCAQMD, August 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/dots/default- source/rule-book/Proposed-Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures 2017 080717.pdf, p. 7. 6 Table 5.8-8
Pacific Oaks Commerce Center GHG Emissions Inventory, With Mitigation Source
Building 1 (BP 2)
MTCOte
Building 2 & Trailer
Parking (BP 3)
MTCOte
Total
MTCOze
Percent of Total
Mobile'
2,610
3,047
5,657
12%
Mobile - Trucks'

7.685
23,445

31.130
64%
Area2
0 0
0 0°b,
Energy

2.286
2,239
4,525
9%
Water
82 97
179
<1%
Solid Waste

2.127
2,514
4,641
10%
Refrigerants
1,161
1,105

2.266
5%
Off -Road Equipment3
0 0
0 0%
Transport Refrigeration Units4
0 0
0 0°10
Amortized Constructions
nla
n.!a
377
1%
Total Emissions
15,952
32,446
48,775
100%
Exceeds No Net Increase Threshold?
Yes
Yes
Yes
—
Source: CaIEEMod v. 2022.1. (See Appendix C)
Note: NA = not applicable; p = negative value
1 Based on calendar year 2026 CalEEMod default vehicle emissions data. Vehicle Seel mix for the Proposed Project based on default CalEEMod vehicle Seel ram adjusted to vehicle fleet mix provided by Tmnslulions for the proposed warehousing. 2 Implementation or Mitigation Measure AQ•11 would require use of electric -powered landscaping equipment only Implementation of Mitigabon Measure AQ-7 would require use of only electric -powered off -road equipment. 4 Implementation of Mitigation Measure A0-8 would require use of E/S TRUs R Construction emissions are amortized over a 30-year project lifetime per recommended South Coast AQMO methodology (South Coast AQMD 2009) However, the SEIR states that with the implementation of mitigation measures, the Project's GHG emissions will be reduced to less than significant levels:
"The Proposed Project would be potentially inconsistent with CARB's 2022 Scoping Plan unless it achieves the three priority areas for ensuring carbon neutrality. Implementation of Mitigation Measures GHG-1 and GHG-2 would ensure that development projects accommodated under the FCSP comply with the CALGreen voluntary Tier 2 EV parking standards in addition to buildings designed to be all electric. Thus, with mitigation, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the transportation electrification and building decarbonization priority areas of the Scoping Plan. Therefore, Impact 5.8-2 would be reduced to less than significant" (p. 5.8-33).

As discussed, the SEIR claims that through the implementation of Mitigation Measures GHG-1 and GHG- 2, the Project would comply with the CALGreen voluntary Tier 2 EV parking standards and consequently result in a less -than -significant GHG impact. However, while the SEIR concludes that the Project would not generate GHG emissions that would have a significant effect on the environment, the SEIR fails to quantify the Project's GHG emissions whatsoever. Until the SEIR provides a quantitative analysis regarding the Project's GHG emissions, the SEIR's claim that the Project would result in a less -than - significant GHG impact is unsubstantiated.

Mitigation
Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions Our analysis demonstrates that the Project would result in potentially significant air quality, health risk, and GHG impacts that should be mitigated further. In an effort to reduce emissions, the Project should 7 consider the implementation of the following mitigation measures found in the California DOJ Warehouse Project Best Practices document.l3
• Requiring off -road construction equipment to be hybrid electric -diesel or zero emission, where available, and all diesel -fueled off -road construction equipment to be equipped with CARB Tier IV -compliant engines or better, and including this requirement in applicable bid documents, purchase orders, and contracts, with successful contractors demonstrating the ability to supply the compliant construction equipment for use prior to any ground -disturbing and construction activities.
• Prohibiting off -road diesel -powered equipment from being in the "on" position for more than 10 hours per day.
• Using electric -powered hand tools, forklifts, and pressure washers, and providing electrical hook ups to the power grid rather than use of diesel -fueled generators to supply their power. • Designating an area in the construction site where electric -powered construction vehicles and equipment can charge.
• Limiting the amount of daily grading disturbance area. • Prohibiting grading on days with an Air Quality Index forecast of greater than 100 for particulates or ozone for the project area.
• Forbidding idling of heavy equipment for more than three minutes. • Keeping onsite and furnishing to the lead agency or other regulators upon request, all equipment maintenance records and data sheets, including design specifications and emission control tier classifications.
• Conducting an on -site inspection to verify compliance with construction mitigation and to identify other opportunities to further reduce construction impacts. • Using paints, architectural coatings, and industrial maintenance coatings that have volatile organic compound levels of less than 10 g/L.
• Providing information on transit and ridesharing programs and services to construction employees.
• Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations for construction employees.
• Requiring all heavy-duty vehicles engaged in drayage to or from the project site to be zero - emission beginning in 2030.
• Requiring all on -site motorized operational equipment, such as forklifts and yard trucks, to be zero -emission with the necessary charging or fueling stations provided. • Requiring tenants to use zero -emission light- and medium -duty vehicles as part of business operations.
• Forbidding trucks from idling for more than three minutes and requiring operators to turn off engines when not in use.
13 "Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act." State of California Department of Justice, September 2022, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/warehouse-best-practices.pdf , p. 8 —10. 8 • Posting both interior- and exterior -facing signs, including signs directed at all dock and delivery areas, identifying idling restrictions and contact information to report violations to CARB, the local air district, and the building manager.
• Installing solar photovoltaic systems on the project site of a specified electrical generation capacity that is equal to or greater than the building's projected energy needs, including all electrical chargers.
• Designing all project building roofs to accommodate the maximum future coverage of solar panels and installing the maximum solar power generation capacity feasible. • Constructing zero -emission truck charging/fueling stations proportional to the number of dock doors at the project.
• Running conduit to designated locations for future electric truck charging stations. • Unless the owner of the facility records a covenant on the title of the underlying property ensuring that the property cannot be used to provide refrigerated warehouse space, constructing electric plugs for electric transport refrigeration units at every dock door and requiring truck operators with transport refrigeration units to use the electric plugs when at loading docks.
• Oversizing electrical rooms by 25 percent or providing a secondary electrical room to accommodate future expansion of electric vehicle charging capability. • Constructing and maintaining electric light -duty vehicle charging stations proportional to the number of employee parking spaces (for example, requiring at least 10% of all employee parking spaces to be equipped with electric vehicle charging stations of at least Level 2 charging performance)
• Running conduit to an additional proportion of employee parking spaces for a future increase in the number of electric light -duty charging stations.
• Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer's recommended maintenance intervals, air filtration systems at sensitive receptors within a certain radius of facility for the life of the project.
• Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer's recommended maintenance intervals, an air monitoring station proximate to sensitive receptors and the facility for the life of the project, and making the resulting data publicly available in real time. While air monitoring does not mitigate the air quality or greenhouse gas impacts of a facility, it nonetheless benefits the affected community by providing information that can be used to improve air quality or avoid exposure to unhealthy air.
• Requiring all stand-by emergency generators to be powered by a non -diesel fuel. • Requiring facility operators to train managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to eliminate unnecessary queuing and idling of trucks. • Requiring operators to establish and promote a rideshare program that discourages single - occupancy vehicle trips and provides financial incentives for alternate modes of transportation, including carpooling, public transit, and biking.
• Meeting CalGreen Tier 2 green building standards, including all provisions related to designated parking for clean air vehicles, electric vehicle charging, and bicycle parking. 9 • Designing to LEED green building certification standards. • Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations. • Posting signs at every truck exit driveway providing directional information to the truck route. • Improving and maintaining vegetation and tree canopy for residents in and around the project area.
• Requiring that every tenant train its staff in charge of keeping vehicle records in diesel technologies and compliance with CARB regulations, by attending CARB-approved courses. Also require facility operators to maintain records on -site demonstrating compliance and make records available for inspection by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request. • Requiring tenants to enroll in the United States Environmental Protection Agency's SmartWay program, and requiring tenants who own, operate, or hire trucking carriers with more than 100 trucks to use carriers that are SmartWay carriers.
• Providing tenants with information on incentive programs, such as the Carl Moyer Program and Voucher Incentive Program, to upgrade their fleets.

These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate Tower -emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently, reduce emissions released during Project construction and operation.

As it is policy of the State that eligible renewable energy resources and zero -carbon resources supply 100% of retail sales of electricity to California end -use customers by December 31, 2045, we emphasize that the energy mix that will charge the batteries and power electrical equipment must be 100% renewable energy resources. Until the feasibility of charging the batteries with renewable energy resources only is evaluated, the Project should not be approved.

A revised EIR should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation measures, as well as include updated air quality, health risk, and GHG analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce emissions to the maximum extent feasible. The revised EIR should also demonstrate a commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project's potentially significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.

Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.
10 Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Attachment A: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment B: Paul Rosenfeld CV
11 Attachment A
SWAPE
Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
Litigation Support for the Environment
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
CEQA Review
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

Professional Certifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA's Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 — present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 — 2104, 2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 -- 2003);

• Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 - 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989- 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 - 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 - 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 -1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 -1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 -1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt's responsibilities have included:

Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.

Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt's duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
2 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production -related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi -volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted 3 public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote "part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective -Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor's investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service -wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed -scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high -levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation- wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi -Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA's national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the regions 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific 4 principles into the policy -making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year -long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.

Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students.

Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
5 Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter -Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
6 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. _ . Potential Water Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP-61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup at Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL- contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 7 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009-2011.
8 Attachment B
SWAPE
Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
Litigation Support for the Environment

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email prosenfeld Fsrvape.cmn
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling
Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Focus on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years of experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 12 October 2022

Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel; San Diego, California, 1999 — 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 — 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications:

Rosenfeld P. E., Spaeth K., Hallman R., Bressler R., Smith, G., (2022) Cancer Risk and Diesel Exhaust Exposure Among Railroad Workers. Water Air Soil Pollution. 233, 171.

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Ha:ardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environrnental Sciences. 113-125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 12 October 2022

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Fortner Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor -Quality -Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation's Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199. - Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Bid -titer. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS-6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 12 October 2022

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States" Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23'4 Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 12 October 2022

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium -Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23"I Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23`d Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 — 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Syrnposiurn on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants — DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey's C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey's Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 12 October 2022

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February- 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial .Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 12 October 2022

James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round -up. 1996.

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Billy Wildrick, Plaintiff vs. BNSF Railway Company
Case No. CIVDS1711810
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-17-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County, State of Georgia
Richard Hutcherson, Plaintiff vs Norfolk Southern Railway Company Case No. 10-SCCV-092007
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2022
In the Civil District Court of the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana Millard Clark, Plaintiff vs. Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al.

Case No. 2020-03891
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-15-2022
In The Circuit Court of Livingston County, State of Missouri, Circuit Civil Division Shirley Rails, Plaintiff vs. Canadian Pacific Railway and Soo Line Railroad Case No. 18-LV-CC0020
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-7-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jonny C. Daniels, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. 20-CA-5502
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-1-2022
In The Circuit Court of St. Louis County, State of Missouri Kieth Luke et. al. Plaintiff vs. Monsanto Company et. al.

Case No. 19SL-CC03191
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-25-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jeffery S. Lamotte, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. NO. 20-CA-0049
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-22-2022
In State of Minnesota District Court, County of St. Louis Sixth Judicial District Greg Bean, Plaintiff vs. Soo Line Railroad Company
Case No. 69-DU-CV-21-760
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-17-2022
In United States District Court Western District of Washington at Tacoma, Washington John D. Fitzgerald Plaintiff vs. BNSF
Case No. 3:21-cv-05288-RJB
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-11-2022
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

In Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Macon Illinois Rocky Bennyhoff Plaintiff vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-L-56
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-3-2022
In Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County Ohio
Joe Briggins Plaintiff vs. CSX
Case No. A2004464
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-17-2022
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern George LaFazia vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. BCV-19-103087
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-17-2022 - -
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Bobby Earles vs. Penn Central et. al.

Case No. 2020-L-000550
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-16-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of Florida Albert Hartman Plaintiff vs. Illinois Central
Case No. 2:20-cv-1633
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-4-2022
In the Circuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit, in and For Duval County, Florida Barbara Steele vs. CSX Transportation
Case No.16-219-Ca-008796
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of New York Romano et al. vs. Northrup Grumman Corporation
Case No. 16-cv-5760
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-10-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Linda Benjamin vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 007599
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Donald Smith vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 003426
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-24-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Jan Holeman vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 000675
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-18-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County State of Georgia
Dwayne B. Garrett vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-SCCV-091232
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-10-2021
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 12 October 2022

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Ruepke vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 007730
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-5-2021
In the United States District Court For the District of Nebraska Steven Gillett vs. BNSF
Case No. 4:20-cv-03120
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-28-2021
In the Montana Thirteenth District Court of Yellowstone County James Eadus vs. Soo Line Railroad and BNSF
Case No. DV 19-1056
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-21-2021
In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al.cvs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc.

Case No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-14-2021
Trial October 8-4-2021
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a

AMTRAK,
Case No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-28-2021
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail Case No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al. vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case No. CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-7-2021
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case No. 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No. 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-30-2019
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 12 October 2022

In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No. 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-7-2019
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS "Conti Perdido" Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles — Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles — Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiffs vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No. 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112`h Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No. 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintifs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No. C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-23-2017
In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case No. 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-22-2020
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No. LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2017
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 11 of 12 October 2022

In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No. RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No. LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action No. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition June 2015
In The Iowa District Court for Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No. 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17`h Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case No. CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case No. cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987)
Rosenfeld Deposition October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2010, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2010
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case No. 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2009
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

0 Green Jobs & Clean Communities
P.O. Box 79222
Corona, CA 92877
To: City of Yucaipa Planning Commission
From: Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance
Subject: Freeway Corridor Specific Plan SIR
This letter is to serve as further comment in addition to all previously submitted comments and documents by Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance.

CalEnviroScreen Information
CalEnviroScreen is a mapping tool that helps identify California communities that are most affected by many sources of pollution, and where people are often especially vulnerable to pollution's effects. CalEnviroScreen uses environmental, health, and socioeconomic information to produce scores for every census tract in the state. The scores are mapped so that different communities can be compared. An area with a high score is one that experiences a much higher pollution burden than areas with low scores. CalEnviroScreen ranks communities based on data that are available from state and federal government sources. CalEnviroScreen is updated and maintained by The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, on behalf ofthe California Environmental Protection Agency.

CalEnviroScreen Data on : Freeway Corridor Specific Plan SIR Project Location/Area The above listed project is in census tract (6071008500). Refer to the following chart for information from the CalEnviroScreen data regarding the census tract the project is located.

Yucaipa — FCSP SIR
Census Tract: 6071008500
Population: 8,540
Overall Percentiles:-
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Percentile
43%
Pollution Burden Percentile
80%

Exposures
%
Ozone
100%
Traffic
69%
Diesel Particulate Matter
55%
Particulate Matter 2.5
53%
Drinking Water
76%
Environmental. Effects
%
Cleanup Sites
58%
Groundwater Threats
60%
Hazardous Waste
78%
Sensitive Populations
Cardiovascular Disease
61%
Socioeconomic Factors
%
Unemployment
55%
-.. CalEnviroScrcen4.0 Indicator Maps' .. .

O,etat Cal[nt„u5taetn accrea al.24102 ..42.P rnn
P.m •n mm..o
.o.,o, tr. �nd-a 0, aft.. li.a nl can• m..p• c..: br
,.axed br cl rl In,} un lc,ndca*on t0 tie ".h
Aropc.r with dr...n•1deu, 0,alu,,.Mam,1.wl
r1.1.1h411 r.rd clwnloa,l.61e, enava+eL'nn
14 C.ICnn.okroa: e 0 r,a.ute
Pollution Bunten
i Result.

OL
Comm Iron 6021004500
l Potn4cn 50.d.n
Ibpolnlen
tA'
C.lt,,,, ,..n a 0?.,w,ol.•al
O.o... lo^
PM25 52
Gera. PM 52
P..II01t. a5
fo.ic llaMa..c
h.Rr.

Onna+n0 W.I., Cunlanri.%
Cl.vwp. 'P
G.wdrater tM.taa
Haaa,dow Watae 04
Mp.'0.d Wrt..: 12
Soled Was.. 0
•yJ

Conclusion
Consider the above referenced information when making this important decision. Realize that you and the citizens of this area face some of the WORST POLLUTION in the entire state of California.

It is the responsibility of the City's elected and appointed officials to make environmentally responsible development decisions. Based on the CalEnviroScreen data, this is more than sufficient evidence of the further air quality impacts that the citizenry of Yucaipa will continue to encounter with further development of another warehouse. We are not against development, as we believe it is necessary for further economic growth in our current society. Development needs to be conducted with the highest of expectations to ensure the local population does not suffer further air quality burdens.

We stand by our comments and believe the SIR is flawed and should be redrafted and recirculated for public review.

Respectfully Submitted,
Szwa, P:*f4044-
Steven Piepkorn
GSEJA
Source -
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/4af93 cf9888a424481 d2868391 af2d82/p age/home/?data_id=dataS ource_2-1754d6afdb4-layer-9%3A7306 Glossary of Terms
Ozone - Amount of daily maximum 8-hour Ozone concentration Particulate Matter 2.5 - Annual mean PM 2.5 concentrations Diesel Particulate Matter - Diesel PM emissions from on -road and non -road sources Toxic Releases - Toxicity -weighted concentrations of modeled chemical releases to air from
facility emissions and off -site incineration.

Traffic -Traffic density, in vehicle -kilometers per hour per road length, within 150 meters of the census tract boundary.

Via Mail & Email: Benjamin Matlock,
Deputy Director of Community Development
Copy: Chris Mann, City Manager
March 30, 2024
Members of the Planning Commission
City of Yucaipa
34272 Yucaipa Blvd
Yucaipa CA 92399
KENNETN G. ROI3INSON

ROBINSON RANCH -NORTH

ROBINSON PROPERTIES

ROBINSON RANCH INVESTMENT COMPANY
RE: Case No. 24-044/GPA/SPA: Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (SP) Dear Members of the Planning Commission:

This letter comments on the draft SP's land use plans on behalf of the SP's largest landowner, Robinson Ranch (above -listed entities). I urge you to table this Case until concerns, including but not limited to the following, are planned more effectively:

The SP's land area is the most economically valuable land in Yucaipa. If you want to maintain and improve the many amenities Yucaipa offers its citizens and balance Yucaipa's struggling budget, economic assets need to be facilitated as well as aesthetic assets. This proposal's plan to replace 2,278,976 sf of Regional Commercial uses with 2,054,00 sf of warehouses could mean financial suicide for Yucaipa's future and would deprive its citizens of retail benefits. There is ample acreage within the SP area to allow for retention of the current commercial zones plus the additionally proposed warehouse space.

Yucaipa's new EIFD offers a means to provide infrastructure but, unless that infrastructure is located and sized to provide for inevitable future growth rather than the SP's limited growth projections, it will soon be obsolete and need to be rebuilt at an enormous cost.

The proposed SP's land uses, exactions, and restrictions may be in violation of laws such as the law resulting from last month's Supreme Court's decision (Sheetz v El Dorado County, CA ).

Land use drafts north of the I-10 result in transferring developable acreage from the private sector (Robinson Ranch) to a government entity (City of Redlands). I don't approve of favoring Big Government over Private Owners. Do you?
SP landowners must be on board for any proposal to come to fruition. Robinson Ranch is opposed to the proposed land uses and believes other landowners are also opposed. When the owners of well over half of the undeveloped land within the SP area are in opposition, please stop, ask yourselves why, listen to the owners and take this matter back to the drawing board.

Sincerely,
Kenneth G. Robinson, Owner and General Partner

Ana Sauseda, MMC
From: Scott Christensen
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2024 1:09 PM
To: Ana Sauseda, MMC
Subject: Pacific Oakes Commerce Center at Palmer Ranch
Yucaipa City Council,
I recently heard about the Pacific Oakes Commerce Center this week. While I'm not a fan of commercial buildings they are necessary because of the spending habits of our population now purchasing many products online. They've improved the landscaping and style of the buildings so it's not just a big concrete colored box.

This project seems better than most because from the documents I've seen. The buildings can't be seen from the freeway or even Oak Glen Rd. I wouldn't want this project on the north side of the freeway because most of the population of Yucaipa lives on that side. I think that's most people's opinion about these buildings.

I think Oak Glen road on the south side is a bit congested at times throughout the holidays because it's only a two lane road at present but the project plans to improve the road up to the turn off to the new road leading to the project and widen it without cost to the city.

Yucaipa isn't job central besides retail and food service so anything providing better paying jobs close by without significant driving is also a win.

The project warrants a good review by city council but it seems to have great potential with few down sides.

Regards,
Scott Christensen
Yucaipa City Resident
1 Ana Sauseda, MMC
From: Mary iroz <
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 5:39 PM
To: Ana Sauseda, MMC
Subject: warehouse and Pacific One Commerce Center project I am very opposed to these projects. They are going to destroy a beautiful, natural, scenic area. Every piece of open space in Yucaipa and the surrounding areas is being developed. Big two story houses are being squeezed into a few acres of land throughout the city.

Traffic is awful now. Paving over more acreage with concrete and asphalt is going to increase the temperatures more. Wildlife is being displaced and residents wonder why the animals stroll onto their yards, perhaps taking their pets.

We have to preserve those positive aspects of Yucaipa. Otherwise, we will just become a large, urban, concrete jungle.

Thank you, Mary Iroz
i

Ana Sauseda, MMC
From: Amie Chapman <
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2024 9:43 PM
To: Ana Sauseda, MMC
Subject: 1-10 Corridor Development Case No 21-196 - Awaiting your reply Hello Ms. Sauseda,
I am in opposition to the Large Building plan that involves the Old Palmer Property along the 10 freeway. This directly affects the quality of living and the way I choose to raise my family in the area.

Please let me know what I need to do to help make the Council members aware of the concerns our local citizens have regarding the growth in this area!!!!
Thank you
Amie Chapman
1 Ana Sauseda, MMC
From: Tracey Stahler-Roche <
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2024 12:24 PM
To: Ana Sauseda, MMC
Subject: public comment
DO not., do not do not build those awful buildings and housing on one of the most beautiful areas in our nearby surroundings. Our natural habitats are disappearing before our eyes. Please leave this little piece of heaven alone. Where would the wildlife go? We don't need the added population and traffic. It would be a nightmare all round. Keep the canyon as it is....beautiful. Tracey Stahler-Roche
re meeting Aug 26th case # FSP 24-044/ GDA/SPA
case # 21-196
1 Ana Sauseda, MMC
From: Jennifer
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2024 6:04 AM
To: Ana Sauseda, MMC
Subject: FSP Case # 24-044/GPA/SPA & 21-196
I oppose the warehouse and Pacific One Commerce Center projects to be located off Live Oak Canyon Rd and Outer Hwy 10 in the city of Yucaipa.

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
1 ATTACHMENT 9

Agenda Item No.

City of Yucaipa

PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of June 5, 2024
2 A Regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Yucaipa, California was called to order in the Council Chambers, 34272 Yucaipa Boulevard, Yucaipa, on June 5, 2024, at 6:30 PM.

PRESENT: J.R. Allgower, Chair
Richard Beck, Commissioner
Stacey Chester, Commissioner
David Higginson, Commissioner
Donna Snodgrass, Commissioner
Lyle Vick, Commissioner
ABSENT: None
CITY STAFF: Benjamin Matlock, Deputy Director of Community Development/City Planner Michael Reiter, Assistant City Attorney
Katrina Kunkel, Associate Engineer
Christian Farmer, Assistant Planner
Maria Koolhoven, Planning Commission Assistant

CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 6:36 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Lyle Vick.

ROLL CALL
Michael Reiter, Assistant City Attorney informed the Commissioners that Tony Hicks resigned his seat as a Planning Commissioner before the start of the meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT:

The following members of the public spoke:
• Hansen Wang
Planning Commission Minutes Page 1
6-5-24

PUBLIC HEARINGS
The order of Business for the Public Hearing Shall Be:

A. Open Public Hearing
B. Disclosure of Ex Parte Communications
C. Staff Presentation
D. Applicant/Representative Presentation (if necessary) E. Public Comments
F. Applicant Rebuttal (if necessary)
G. Public Hearing Closed
H. Commission Discussion

1. SUBJECT: FREEWAY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE (CASE NO. 24- 044/GPA/SPA) & PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (21-196/CUP/ARC/TPM): THE

EXISTING FREEWAY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN (FCSP), ADOPTED IN NOVEMBER 2008, ALLOWS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 2,447 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 424.7 ACRES AND UP TO 4,585,779 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES ON 242.7 ACRES WITHIN THE 1,242-ACRE PLAN AREA. THE PROPOSED UPDATE TO THE FCSP (CASE NO. 24-044/GPA/SPA) WOULD RESULT IN A TOTAL OF 2,472 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 5,093,265 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES. AS A RESULT, THE PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD RESULT IN AN INCREASE OF 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 2,786,461 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK (BP), AND A REDUCTION OF 2,278,976

SQUARE FEET OF REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (RC) COMPARED TO THE EXISTING FCSP. THE PROPOSED PROJECT ALSO INCLUDES DEVELOPMENT OF THE PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (21-196/CUP/ARC/TPM), WHICH CONSISTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO (2) BUILDINGS WITH WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE SPACES, TOTALING 2,054,000 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING SPACE, AS WELL AS TRUCK

PARKING AND DOCKING BAYS, CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS INCLUDED IN THE FCSP UPDATE.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and pursuant to Sections 82.0101 and 83.020305 of the Yucaipa Development Code, provide a recommendation to the City Council regarding the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (FCSP) and the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), as well as Case No. 21-196 for the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center.

Depending on the Planning Commission's review and recommendation, several potential motions can be made and are as follows:

Recommendation in support of the FCSP Update:

Planning Commission Minutes Page 2
6-5-24

If the Planning Commission is in support of the FCSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:
1) Adopt Resolution No. 2024-06, approving the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update; certifying that the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); accepting the mitigation measures identified in the Final SEIR; adopting Findings of Fact; and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and
2) Approve first reading, by title only, as read by staff, of Ordinance No. 448, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, California, amending Ordinance No. 343, amending of the official land use plan and zoning ordinance of the City of Yucaipa; and 3) Approve the Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 21-196), subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in the Agenda Report, and if acceptable, approve the Architectural Design and preliminary landscaping, for the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center Project (POCC); and 4) Adopt the Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and 5) Approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and direct Staff to file a Notice of Determination.

Recommendation against the FCSP Update:

If the Planning Commission is not in support of the FCSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:
1) Direct Staff to prepare a Resolution to deny the approval of the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update; and
2) Direct Staff to prepare Findings for denial, based on the Planning Commission's consideration of the Project with respect to Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code; and 3) Deny Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 21-196), as it is inconsistent with the land use designations of the existing Freeway Corridor Specific Plan; and 4) Determine that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15270 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.

Alternatives:

The Planning Commission can make any additional recommendations to modify the FCSP Update that are deemed necessary to meet the Findings specified by Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code, or that would better meet the Goals, Policies, and/or Objectives of the General Plan.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 3
6-5-24

Draft Findings of Approval, as well as the Draft Resolution and Ordinance are provided for the Planning Commission's reference and review. Modifications can be made based on the deliberations of the item and will be presented for the City Council's final action.

DISCUSSION:

The following ex parte communications were disclosed. Commissioner Chester met with Pacific Oaks for a meeting about the project and met with the Pumpkin Patch to see how this would affect them and their operation. Commissioner Vick noted that he met with the Pumpkin Patch owners and had a meeting with Pacific Oaks. Commissioner Snodgrass met with Tyler Rameson with the Pumpkin Patch and had a meeting with Pacific Oaks and spoke with Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Bengamin Matlock and Commissioner Chester. Commissioner Beck had no ex parte to disclose.

Commissioner Higginson had a meeting with Pacific Oaks and met with representatives from the Pumpkin Patch. Staff noted that the meetings with Pacific Oaks consisted of materials that were presented in the agenda packet.

Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock presented the Agenda Report.

Commissioner Chester noted traffic concerns and asked staff if the number of big rig trucks staging throughout the city were accounted for in the traffic study. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock stated that the traffic study does address the operations based on the layout of the street that will be developed. Associate Engineer Katrina Kunkel informed the Commission that the traffic study will account for peak hour traffic and that the infrastructure is designed to accommodate when there would be the most concentration of trucks.

Chair Allgower asked staff if the future residential component was included in the traffic study. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock noted that the traffic study assessment included the full build out construction plan.

Commissioner Beck asked staff what tenants/businesses would be occupying the warehouses. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock stated that the buildings speculative, but would let the applicant provide additional information.

Commissioner Chester asked staff if there would be any restriction that that city would impose on the Pumpkin Patch to restrict their current operations. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock informed the Commission that there are no current provisions that would restrict their operations.

Commissioner Higginson noted that he understands the streamlining and focus to protect the Pumpkin Patch. He stated that the Commission does not want to diminish their operation, and that the Pumpkin Patch is a vital business to the community.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 4
6-5-24

Terri Allen with Pacific Industrial introduced the rest of the Pacific Industrial staff in attendance with her.

Ms. Allen noted that there is no tenant at this time for either warehouse. Terri Allen thanked staff for the presentation and proceeded with a PowerPoint presentation.

Commissioner Vick stated that the Pacific Industrial plans were a good and well thought out project.

Commissioner Higginson complimented the project and location and appreciated the time put into this project by the applicant. Commissioner Higginson noted that the mix of uses has been a part of the original FCSP and that the update is a refining to the project.

PUBLIC COMMENT
The following members of the public spoke:
• Elijah Silva
• David Martinez
• Zach Strasters
• Hansen Wang
• John Sisley
• Timothy Slade
• Robert Lugan
• Eddie Campos
• Thomas Ruiz
• Tyler Rameson
Dan Floriani with Pacific Oaks noted that he appreciated all the comments. He stated that he loves the Pumpkin Patch and doesn't want to see it go anywhere. He appreciates the Commissions commitment to protect the Pumpkin Patch. Mr. Floriani noted that he is in full support of the Pumpkin Patch and would like to help their operation.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

Commissioner Higginson stated that he appreciates the support, time and effort for the project and the presentations.

Commissioner Chester thanked staff for the presentation and expressed appreciation for all the hard work they do. She noted that the Pumpkin Patch has put the City of Yucaipa on the map and is very passionate about the Pumpkin Patch.

Commissioner Beck stated that he likes development, but has concerns about impacts coming from the warehouses.

Commissioner Vick noted that the million square foot warehouses have the lowest vacancy.

Commissioner Vick stated that he does not have a problem with the development, and he appreciates the proposal of the project.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 5
6-5-24

Commissioner Snodgrass stated that she is concerned about the future projects across the county line and how that will affect the city.

Chair Allgower noted that he does not agree with the zoning change for the Pumpkin Patch. He stated that the open space could be better utilized.

ACTION: MOTION TO CONTINUE THE ITEM TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING ON JULY 17, 2024, BY Commissioner Beck, SECOND BY Commissioner Vick, CARRIED, 5-1-0-0, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

2. SUBJECT: STARLING HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN (CASE NO. 22-129/GPA/SP/TTM 20372): THE STARLING HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN PROVIDES THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR A 14.78-ACRE SITE FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INCLUDES TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) 20372 TO FORMALLY CREATE A 127-UNIT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND ASSOCIATED

COMMUNITY FEATURES INCLUDING A RECREATION CENTER, ACTIVE PARK, DOG

PARK, ENTRY MONUMENTS, AND DETENTION BASINS BASED ON THE SPECIFIC PLAN. A MINOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT IS ALSO PROPOSED TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE SITE SHOWN ON GENERAL PLAN FIGURE CDL-2, LAND USE MAP, FROM RS-20M (SINGLE -RESIDENTIAL, 20,000 SQUARE FOOT

MINIMUM) TO PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT), AND A MODIFICATION TO GENERAL PLAN FIGURE, CDL-3, LAND USE MODIFICATIONS, TO ADD THE STARLING HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED AT THE NE CORNER OF 12TH STREET AND AVENUE E; APNS: 0318-021-18, 19, -44 & -58.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and pursuant to Sections 82.0101 and

83.020305 of the Yucaipa Development Code, provide a recommendation to the City Council regarding the Starling Heights Specific Plan (SHSP) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), as well as the associated Tract Map (TTM 20372).

Depending on the Planning Commission's review and recommendation, several potential motions can be made and are as follows:

Recommendation in support of the SHSP Update:

If the Planning Commission is in support of the SHSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-33, approving the Specific Plan for the proposed Starling Heights Specific Plan and the associated minor General Plan Amendment / Land Use District Change of a property from RS-20M Single Residential, 20,000 square foot minimum lot size) to the land use designation of PD (Planned Development); and
Planning Commission Minutes Page 6
6-5-24

2. Approve first reading, by the title only, as read by staff, of Ordinance No. 449, amending Ordinance No. 343, amending the Official Land Use Plan and Zoning Ordinance as adopted by the City of Yucaipa; and

3. Approve the Tentative Tract Map No. 20372 (Case No. 22-129/TTM 20372), subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in this Agenda Report; and

4. Adopt the Findings as contained in this Agenda Report; and

5. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, finding the mitigation measures and standard measures and procedures will reduce the potential level of environmental impact to less than significant; and

6. Direct staff to file a Notice of Determination; and,

7. Review, and if it is considered acceptable, approve the architectural design and conceptual landscaping for the proposed Project.

Recommendation against the SHSP:

If the Planning Commission is not in support of the SHSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:

1. Direct Staff to prepare a Resolution to deny the approval of the Starling Heights Specific Plan; and

2. Direct Staff to prepare Findings for denial, based on the Planning Commission's consideration of the Project with respect to Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code; and

3. Deny Tentative Tract Map 20372 (Case No. 22-129), as it is inconsistent with the land use designations of the existing Land Use District; and

4. Determine that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15270 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.

Alternatives:

The Planning Commission can make any additional recommendations to modify the SHSP that are deemed necessary to meet the Findings specified by Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code, or that would better meet the Goals, Policies, and/or Objectives of the General Plan.

Draft Findings of Approval, as well as the Draft Resolution and Ordinance are provided for the Planning Commission's reference and review. Modifications can be made based on the deliberations of the item and will be presented for the City Council's final action.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 7
6-5-24

DISCUSSION:

Assistant Planner Christian Farmer presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, William Rockwell, was in attendance via conference call. Mr. Rockwell thank the Commission and Assistant Planner Christian Farmer for his presentation. He noted that both the initial and current concern is density and he tried everything in his power to mitigate that.

Commissioner Beck asked the applicant for the average lot size. Mr. Rockwell informed the Commission that the average lot size is roughly 3,000 sq. ft.

PUBLIC COMMENT
The following members of the public spoke:
• Mike Simpson
• Jillian Simpson
• Brian Taylor
• Hansen Wang
Mr. Rockwell thanked all the public speakers for their comments and stated that they focused on affordability.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

Commissioner Higginson noted that applicant has done a good job with the variety of the aesthetics, and it is a creative use of the land.

Commissioner Chester noted ingress and egress concerns.

Commissioner Beck does not agree with the density of the project.

Commissioner Vick stated that he is tired of the higher -density projects and that these homes are not priced for starter families.

Commissioner Snodgrass expressed density concerns, noting that this project is in the wrong area, and that she also does not like the architectural design.

ACTION #1: MOTION TO APPROVE BY Commissioner Higginson, NOT CARRIED, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.

ACTION #2: MOTION TO DENY THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AS IT IS

INCONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE PROJECT BY Commissioner Chester, SECOND BY Commissioner Snodgrass, CARRIED, 5-1-0-0, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 8
6-5-24

3. SUBJECT: CASE NO. 24-046/GPA: CITY OF YUCAIPA GENERAL PLAN SAFETY ELEMENT UPDATE.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and provide a recommendation to the City Council to:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-09, adopting the Safety Element Update to the General Plan; and

2. Determine that the update to the Safety Element is within the scope of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared pursuant to the provisions of Section 15168 of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, for the City's General Plan; and

3. Adopt the Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and

4. Direct staff to file a Notice of Determination.

DISCUSSION:

Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner presented the Agenda Report.

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Chester, SECOND BY Commissioner Snodgrass, CARRIED, 6-0-0-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

ANNOUNCEMENTS: Deputy Director /City Planner Benjamin Matlock noted that the next scheduled Planning Commission Meeting will be held in the middle of July since Chair Allgower will not be available, and we do not have a Vice Chair at this time.

ADJOURNMENT:

The meeting adjourned at 10:48 PM.

Benjamin Matlock JR Allgower
Deputy Director/City Planner Chair of the Planning Commission Planning Commission Minutes Page 9
6-5-24

Attachment 10
Draft July 17, 2024 Planning Commission minutes

ATTACHMENT 10

Agenda Item No.

City of Yucaipa

PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of July 17, 2024
1 A Regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Yucaipa, California was called to order in the Council Chambers, 34272 Yucaipa Boulevard, Yucaipa, on July 17, 2024, at 6:30 PM.

PRESENT: J.R. Allgower, Chair
Stacey Chester, Commissioner
David Higginson, Commissioner
Donna Snodgrass, Commissioner
Lyle Vick, Commissioner
ABSENT: Richard Beck, Commissioner
CITY STAFF: Benjamin Matlock, Deputy Director of Community Development/City Planner Michael Reiter, Assistant City Attorney
Fermin Preciado, Director of Development Services / City Engineer Christian Farmer, Assistant Planner
Katie Syme, Development Services Technician
Maria Koolhoven, Planning Commission Assistant

CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 6:31 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Lyle Vick.

ROLL CALL
Commissioner Richard Beck had an excused absence.

SELECTION OF INTERIM VICE -CHAIR
A. ACTION: MOTION BY Chair Allgower, SECOND BY Commissioner Snodgrass TO SELECT STACEY CHESTER AS INTERIM VICE -CHAIR, MOTION CARRIED 5-0- 1-0.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 1
7-17-24

PUBLIC COMMENT:

The following members of the public spoke:
• Chris Venable
• Hansen Wang
• Dr. Newman

CONSENT AGENDA
The following Consent Agenda items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. The Planning Commission will act upon them, at one time, without discussion. Any Commissioner or staff member may request removal of an item from the Consent Agenda for discussion.

1. SUBJECT: APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 1, 2024.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Snodgrass, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 4-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 1. (INTERIM VICE -CHAIR CHESTER WAS NOT IN ATTENDANCE AT THE MAY 1, 2024, PC MEETING).

2. SUBJECT: APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 5, 2024.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Snodgrass, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 2. (WITH THE CORRECTION ON PAGE 8 OF COMMISSIONER CHESTER'S LAST NAME CORRECTED).

DISCUSSION ITEMS

3. SUBJECT: JOHN NEJAD (CASE NO. 23-109/DBA/CUP/ARC): A DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT TO ALLOW A 100 PERCENT INCREASE IN UNIT DENSITY ON A

RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PARCEL, AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 52-UNIT, AGE -RESTRICTED, SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT THAT INCLUDES TWO (2) ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADUS), THAT CONSISTS OF FOUR (4), TWO-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

INCLUDING A CLUB HOUSE, BARBEQUE AREA, COMMUNITY GARDEN AND SITE LANDSCAPING AT 34567 WILDWOOD CANYON ROAD; APNS: 0319-191-19, -27, -28, -29, & -34.
(Continued from May 1, 2024)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission review the proposed colors, materials, and architectural design and, if acceptable, approve Case No. 23-109/PUP/ARC/DBA.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 2
7-17-24

DISCUSSION:

Assistant Planner Christian Farmer presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, John Nejad, was in attendance, and stated that he was available to answer any questions the Commission may have.

Commissioner Snodgrass stated the project was 100 percent improved and thanked the applicant for the updates.

PUBLIC COMMENT:

The following members of the public spoke:
• Hansen Wang
ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Snodgrass, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
The order of Business for the Public Hearing Shall Be:

A. Open Public Hearing
B. Disclosure of Ex Parte Communications
C. Staff Presentation
D. Applicant/Representative Presentation (if necessary) E. Public Comments
F. Applicant Rebuttal (if necessary)
G. Public Hearing Closed
H. Commission Discussion
Planning Commission Minutes Page 3
7-17-24

4. SUBJECT: FREEWAY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE (CASE NO. 24-044/GPA/SPA) & PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (21-196/CUP/ARC/TPM): THE EXISTING FREEWAY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN (FCSP), ADOPTED IN NOVEMBER 2008, ALLOWS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 2,447 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 424.7 ACRES AND UP TO 4,585,779 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES ON 242.7 ACRES WITHIN THE 1,242- ACRE PLAN AREA. THE PROPOSED UPDATE TO THE FCSP (CASE NO. 24-044/GPA/SPA) WOULD RESULT IN A TOTAL OF 2,472 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 5,093,265 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES. AS A RESULT, THE PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD RESULT IN AN INCREASE OF 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 2,786,461 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK (BP), AND A REDUCTION OF 2,278,976 SQUARE FEET OF REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (RC) COMPARED TO THE EXISTING FCSP. THE PROPOSED PROJECT ALSO INCLUDES DEVELOPMENT OF THE PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (21-196/CUP/ARC/TPM), WHICH CONSISTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO (2) BUILDINGS WITH WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE SPACES, TOTALING 2,054,000 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING SPACE, AS

WELL AS TRUCK PARKING AND DOCKING BAYS, CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS INCLUDED IN THE FCSP UPDATE.
(Continued for June 5. 2024)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and pursuant to Sections 82.0101 and 83.020305 of the Yucaipa Development Code, provide a recommendation to the City Council regarding the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (FCSP) and the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), as well as Case No. 21-196 for the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center. If the Planning Commission is in support of the FCSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:
1) Adopt Resolution No. 2024-19, approving the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update; certifying that the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); accepting the mitigation measures identified in the Final SEIR; adopting Findings of Fact; and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and
2) Approve first reading, by title only, as read by staff, of Ordinance No. 448, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, California, amending Ordinance No. 343, amending of the official land use plan and zoning ordinance of the City of Yucaipa; and 3) Approve the Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 21-196), subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in the Agenda Report, and if acceptable, approve the Architectural Design and preliminary landscaping, for the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center Project (POCC); and 4) Adopt the Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and 5) Approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and direct Staff to file a Notice of Determination.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 4
7-17-24

Based on the Commission's discussion at the prior Public Hearing, modifications to the FCSP have since been added to the Errata sheet that reflect the interests of the "Pumpkin Factory." Alternatives:

The Planning Commission can make any additional recommendations to modify the FCSP Update that are deemed necessary to meet the Findings specified by Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code, or that would better meet the Goals, Policies, and/or Objectives of the General Plan.

Draft Findings of Approval, as well as the Draft Resolution and Ordinance are provided for the Planning Commission's reference and review. Modifications can be made based on the deliberations of the item and will be presented for the City Council's final action.

DISCUSSION:

Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock presented the Agenda Report.

Representatives from Pacific Industrial were in attendance but did not wish to make a presentation.

PUBLIC COMMENT
The following members of the public spoke:
• Tyler Rameson
• Edward Timmons
• Hansen Wang
• Bill Sellers
• Kathy Sellers
• Colleen Wang
• Kevin Miskin
The Public Hearing was then closed.

The following ex parte communications were disclosed. Commissioner Vick noted that spoke with Craig Heaps and Ken Robinson regarding the project provisions on his property.

Commissioner Higginson asked for clarification on the infrastructure aspects of the project. Director of Development Services / City Engineer Fermin Preciado stated that both the FCSP Update and the Pacific Oaks Project both contain Conditions of Approval that were derived from various studies as part of the environmental review. All improvements are required to be completed prior to occupancy of the warehouse and the remaining infrastructure requirements for traffic and transportation are associated with the remaining development with the FCSP.

Commissioner Chester noted traffic concerns and asked if the traffic study considered the trucks that would be parked along the roads throughout the city and causing congestion. Director of Development Planning Commission Minutes Page 5
7-17-24

Services / City Engineer Fermin Preciado noted that the trip generation numbers were taken into consideration.

Commissioner Vick asked for clarification regarding the industrial and regional commercial zoning and what that would mean. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock noted that that this would help protect against the freeway adjacent commercial pads from being warehouses but would allow regional commercial uses such as retail.

Commissioner Snodgrass asked for clarification on where the County line is and stated that she is concerned about the future projects in Calimesa that may affect the city.

ACTION: MOTION TO RECOMMEND THE ITEM FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL THAT WOULD INCLUDE THE ERRATA SHEET EXCEPT FOR ITEM #13, BY Chair Allgower, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, NOT CARRIED, 2-3-1-0, (INTERIM

VICE CHAIR CHESTER, COMMISSIONER SNODGRASS, AND COMMISSIONER VICK VOTED NO) FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 4:

5. SUBJECT: APT TOWERS (CASE NO. 24-011/CUP); A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE REVIEW OF A 75-FOOT-TALL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY DESIGNED AS A EUCALYPTUS TREE, WITH A 200 SQUARE FOOT LEASE AREA FOR THE

ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT WHICH WILL BE SURROUNDED BY AN EIGHT -FOOT -TALL BLOCK WALL LOCATED AT 12954 BRYANT STREET, APN 0319-172-08.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and; A) Review the design and location of the proposed telecommunications facility, and if it is acceptable, approve Conditional Use Permit No. 24-011, subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in the Agenda Report; and
B) Adopt the Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and C) Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, Section 15303 (Class 3); and D) Direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

DISCUSSION:

Commissioner Vick recused himself from the agenda item due to proximity to the site.

Assistant Planner Christian Farmer presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, David Elliott, was in attendance and available to answer any questions the Commissioners may have.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 6
7-17-24

Commissioner Higginson asked the applicant to explain the safety aspects regarding the cell tower. The applicant, David Elliott, noted that all cell towers are regulated by the FCC and every antenna is very strictly monitored and maintained. Commissioner Snodgrass noted that the EF radiation from the tower has no impact to those below.

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

ACTION #1: MOTION TO APPROVE BY Commissioner Snodgrass, WITH THE

CONDITIONS TO HAVE A SHIELDED CABLE AND EMF SHIELDING PAINT INSIDE THE ELECTRICAL VAULT, NOT CARRIED, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.

ACTION #2: MOTION BY Interim Vice Chair Chester, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 4-0-1-1, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.

6. SUBJECT: ROBERT AND VIOLA CRABB (CASE NO. 24-032/SUP/ARC): A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 1,890 SQUARE FOOT AND 17-FOOT-

TALL STEEL RV CARPORT PROPOSED ON A SINGLE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 36320 WOODBRIAR STREET; APN: 1242-451-08.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and:

A) Review the architectural design of the proposed metal structure, and if it is acceptable, approve the design subject to the Conditions of Approval; and
B) Adopt the Special Use Permit Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and C) Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, Section 15303 (Class 3); and D) Direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

DISCUSSION:

Development Services Technician Katie Syme presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, Robert Crabb, was in attendance and stated that he just needs to cover up his motorhome and thanked the Commission for their time.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 7
7-17-24

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Vick, SECOND BY Interim Vice -Chair Chester, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.

7. SUBJECT: MIKE HAMMER (CASE NO. 24-048/SUP/ARC): A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 17.25-FOOT-TALL AND 1,200 SQUARE FOOT STEEL ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ON A SINGLE -RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12728 DOUGLAS STREET; APN: 0322-103-27.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and:

A) Review the architectural design of the proposed metal structure, and if it is acceptable, approve the design subject to the Conditions of Approval; and
B) Adopt the Special Use Permit Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and C) Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, Section 15303 (Class 3); and D) Direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

DISCUSSION:

Development Services Technician Katie Syme presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, Mike Hammer, was in attendance and stated that he would like to store his tools and trailers.

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Higginson, SECOND BY Interim Vice -Chair Chester, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 8
7-17-24

8. SUBJECT: SHAUN BORDEN (CASE NO. 24-063/PUP/MNV): A PLANNING USE PERMIT TO REAUTHORIZE AN EXPIRED USE PERMIT FOR CASE NO. 17-012, WHICH CONSISTS OF ADDING THIRTEEN (13) SINGLE -STORY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ARRANGED AS DUPLEXES TO A 1.85 ACRE PROPERTY THAT FEATURES AN EXISTING RESIDENCE, LOCATED 34757 AVENUE H, EAST OF THE CORNER OF AVENUE H AND 3RD STREET,

AND A MINOR VARIANCE FOR A REDUCTION OF THE REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW FOR A 10 FOOT, 6 INCH SETBACK IN LIEU OF A 15 FOOT SETBACK.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and:

A) Approve Planning Use Permit No. 24-063 subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in this Agenda Report; and
B) And then close the public hearing, and then Planning Commission review the proposed architecture and conceptual landscape design, and if it is acceptable, approve the design C) Adopt the Findings as contained in this Agenda Report; and D) Adopt the Minor Variance Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and E) Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15305 (Class 5) and 15332 (Class 32) of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and F) Direct Staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

DISCUSSION:

Assistant Planner Christian Farmer presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, Bryce Borden, was in attendance and stated Assistant Planner Christian Farmer covered the project in his presentation.

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Vick, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 9
7-17-24

ANNOUNCEMENTS: Deputy Director /City Planner Benjamin Matlock thanked all in attendance. Mr.

Matlock thanked the Commissioners for their input on the FCSP that will be included as part of the information presented to the City Council.

ADJOURNMENT:

The meeting adjourned at 8:22 PM.

Benjamin Matlock JR Allgower
Deputy Director/City Planner Chair of the Planning Commission Planning Commission Minutes Page 10
7-17-24

Attachment 11
Draft Environmental Impact Report (under separate cover) EIR Link: FCSP Draft SEIR
Appendices accessible here: City's Environmental Review Page Attachment 12
Final Environmental Impact Report (under separate cover) FSEIR Link: FCSP Final SEIR
Attachment 13
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (under separate cover) MMRP Link: FCSP MMRP

ATTACHMENT 14

■
BUILDING 1
00 00
AL ft
.jrAID
0 / /\\ �r
AL
/ / AL
r_ 00
0 �* 0
0 BUILDING 2
RGA
Office of Architectural Design
15231 Alton Parkway, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
8841 RESEARCH DR
SUITE 200
IRVINE • CA 92618
949.387.1323
RIDGELA.COM

PACIFIC OAKS

COMMERCE CENTER
0 60 120 240
360

PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
9/13/2023
1/14/2022
11/17/2021
MARK
DATE

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

DRAFT SCHEMATIC DESIGN

DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-2A2-1
DRAWN BY:

RLA
CHK'D BY:

RLA
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
SHEET TITLE:
1 0 0
J:\Dwgs\RGA\Pacific Oaks\1-SD\po-plp.dwg, 9/13/2023 3:34:15 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3

�/
1 •

PROJECT INFORMATION
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
0301-211-10, 12
0301-221-10
0301-201-26
0301-191-21
i

22.7-1
1 1
1 VICINITY MAP
1 1
6'H TRASH

ENCLOSURE

II II II III
i
J
8'H TUBE STEEL FENCE
r
•
_ _ _ _ _ NEW LOT LINE
•
•
•

DUNLAP ACRES
Kentucky St
S
0 A©O
•
Falrment St
Yucape c,
Tayss Cr
Kelly I n
O9
Curarapo sr
Car�meav 8r�
SITE
W rovrlty Line LP
Tara, WaV
Avenue
eo
ve
W me
Eureka St
Noreen Ln
Colorado St
Fairview Dr
Clark LN
Woody Ln
n
s m
A enue G
W Ave L
Nr4s��
WILOWO
CANVO

0. Avenue 1
Clark e'a
Diner
Aven
•
•
YLEEL F_Ek1C
12'X55' TRAILER STALLS
BUILDING 1
•
78 DOCK POSITION
10 TRAILESTALL
•
515 AUTO 4 TALLS
CONST. TY I' E III—B

ESFR SPRI KLERS
MAX. HEIGH : 62 FT.
12'X55' TRAILE
8'H TUBE STEEL FENCE

SECONDARY

FIRE ACCESS

DRIVE (SEE CIVIL)
1 1
•
•
•
•
•
•
TUBE

STEEL FENCE
0 I I I I I I I I I
1113 2 40'

57.4'
•
•
•
•
i
—
•
•
•
•
Ocp
6'H TRASH

ENCLOSURE
•
•
•
•
/g\
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE:

PROPOSED MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:

PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION TYPE:

PROPOSED USE:

PROJECT DATA
62'
S-1
(WAREHOUSE / LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)

SITE AREA

BUILDING AREA

COVERAGE

BUILDING AREA BY USE
OFFICE

WAREHOUSE

AUTO PARKING

REQUIRED PARKING
OFFICE

WAREHOUSE

TOTAL REQUIRED

PARKING PROVIDED

STANDARD STALLS

ADA STALLS

EV STALLS

TOTAL PROVIDED

DOCK LOADING ZONES

REQUIRED

PROVIDED

TRAILER PARKING

PROVIDED
BUILDING 1
2,625,382 SF

60.270 AC
1,052,500 SF

40.09%
20,000 SF
1,032,500 SF
80 1,033
1,113
453
11 52
515
4 178
410
BUILDING 2
2,838,221 SF

65.157 AC
1,001,500 SF

35.29%
20,000 SF
981,500 SF
80 982
1,062
418
10 48
475
4 178
326
TOTAL
5,463,603 SF
125.427 AC
2,054,000 SF

37.59%
40,000 SF
2,014,000 SF
160
2,014
2,174
870
21 99
990
8 356
736
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
ARCHITECT:

RGA
Office of Architectural Design
15231 Alton Parkway, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
APPLICANT:
4, PACIFIC

INDUSTRIAL
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
EMAIL:

PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

YUCAIPA, CA

SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN
1/14/22
11/19/21
DATE
2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL

PLANNING SUBMITTAL SET

DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-A1-1P
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
Al
0 1
50'
1 r

2. 7
1 40
r
8'H TUBE STEEL FENCE
r

NEW LOT LINE
S)
40 LLJ
CD
L
O
N
co
h-1uL)uuu
u u u
u u
8'H TUBE STEEL FENCE
12'X55' TRAILER STALLS
LLJ
8'H TUBE

STEEL FENCE
O
1,544'
co
•
O
co
140
N ;
22'
40'

57.4'
19'26'19
1926' 19' 12'
6'H TRASH

ENCLOSURE
i
I
17777
e I
® I
r///
▪ I
12'
19'26' 19
19' 2
0 BUILDING
1,052,500
178 DOCK POSITIO
410 TRAILER STAL
o15 AUTO STALL;
CONST. TYPE III-B

ESFR SPRINKLERS
MAX. HEIGHT: 62 FT.

IS
S
FE
- ;OFFICE
CC)
N
0 N
r,r,r,r,r, ^r,',,,r,r,
r,r,r,r,,,�
L
N
E
N__
1 12'X55' TRAILER STALLS
OFFICE
I IR
•
•
co

SECONDARY
8'H TUBE STEEL FENCE

FIRE ACCESS

DRIVE (SEE CIVIL)
M
r)
0 SCALE: 1" = 80'-0"
ARCHITECT:

RGA
Office of Architectural Design
15231 Alton Parkway, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
APPLICANT:

PACIFIC

INDUSTRIAL
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
EMAIL:

PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

YUCAIPA, CA
SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN - BUILDING 1
SD
SD
MARK
1/14/22
2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL
11/19/21

PLANNING SUBMITTAL SET
DATE

DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-A1-1P
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE

BUILDING 1
SEE SHT. A1-1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
F
T
•
•
•
•
N
•
•
N
•
•
N
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
--
•
•
•
•
•
X
X
S
178- DOCK POSITIONS
326 TRAILER -STALLS;
5 AUTO STALLS
CONST. TYPE III-B

SFR'SPRINIKLERRS
X. H IGHT'. F .
6'H TRASH

ENCLOSURE
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
A
X
i
X
X
X
X
/
•
•
ARCHITECT:

RGA
Office of Architectural Design
15231 Alton Parkway, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
APPLICANT:

PACIFIC

INDUSTRIAL
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
EMAIL:

PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

YUCAIPA, CA
SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN - BUILDING 2
SD
SD
MARK
1/14/22
2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL
11/19/21

PLANNING SUBMITTAL SET
DATE

DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-A1-1P
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
Al
2 1 542'-F
a
2 Q
� �
u uuuuuu� uuuuuuu�
uuuuuuu� uuuuuuu� uuuuuuu�
00000uu�
uuuuuuu�
uuuuuuu� uuuuuuu�
uuuuuuu� uuuuuuu�
o000000
uuuuuuu�
uuuuuuu
N uuuu
` `
-
Lf)
LC)
•
0)
m
CoCo
m
Co
(NJ
N
ti
c
ao
N
Eo
N
E
Op
0,-)
co
o

BUILDING
1 0
,)
N
N
CO
1,052,500SF

OCCUPANCY
S-1
H
i
N
i
'
CONST

TYPE III-B
\
En
o
\
ESFR
MAX.

SPRINKLERS
HEIGHT: 62
FT.
o
\
a
E
N
N
•
ti
1`
ao
N
Co
N
Co
(0
Co
(0
6)
67 Li)
LC)
Co
,
r
,-
Co
♦
-r
1-1 r-, r-, r-,
r-, r-, 1 1
1—I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r-, r-, r-, r-, r-, 1 1
1—I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I —I r-, r-, r-, 1 1 rZr1
r-, r-, r-, r-, 1 1 r1 1 1 r mr-1 r-, i p
r1 r-, r-, r-1 1 1 1 1 I-1 r-, r-, r-,
r-, r-, I-1 1—I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I-1 1—I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I-1 1-1 �♦
1 J J J J J J 'J J J 'J
1 1
�\
`''
~�
NTIRY ;
OFFICE
- - - - - - - - - -
OFFICE ~ ENTRYI-
3 `o
E.♦
I� 1
I Jr
�\
L
J 1_
1-7-1J
548'
12'
119'
1,176'
119'
12'
48' 5'
ii i i
i o i
1,544'
i
i i
111-1_J I
SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" 0' 50' 100' 200'
ARCHITECT:

RGA
Office of Architectural Design
15231 Alton Parkway, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
APPLICANT:

PACIFIC

INDUSTRIAL
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
EMAIL:

PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

YUCAIPA, CA
SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 1
SD
MARK
11/19/21

PLANNING SUBMITTAL SET
DATE

DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-1A2-1
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE

i
5' 48'
L12'
65'
1,346'
ii
1 ��_
1 MAIN _
ENTRY
1 I
OFFICE
C
a
. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
h

I LJ LJ

LJ LJ LJ LJ
LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ I n

I LJ LJ LJ

LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ
"LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ 1 1 1 I
n I LJ LJ LJ 1 1 IJ LJ LJ ME L_
LJ 1 1 LJ
LJ LJ LJ LJ 1 1 LJ LJ LJ

LJ LJ LJ LJ

LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ

LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ
_.

Cho
()
L
J
_I _I _I
_I _I
_I _I
_I _I
Eo
Lo
o)
co
co
Fpo
C
N
0)
co
o
co

BUILDING
2 N
r,
N
\
1,001,500SF

OCCUPANCY
S-1
N
L J

CONST TYPE
III-B
o

ESFR SPRINKLERS
MAX. HEIGHT:
62 FT.
0)
N
cm
-60
c
Ec
N
a7
ED
Lf)
r-1 r-1 r1 r-1 r-1 r-1
r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 rrrI
r-1 r-1 r-1
r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1
r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-i rrrI
1-7 1-1 1 1 1-7 1-7 r-1 1-7 1-7 r—
1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7
1-7 1-7 1--11-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7
1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7
1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7
1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7
1N
J J J J J J �
Co
Ir
_MAIN _ -
ENTRY
1 OFFICE
a
Q
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .
\
L J
5' 48'
12'
65'
1,346'
//
1,476'
FT -
SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" 0' 10' 20' 50'
Al1
100'
ARCHITECT:

RGA
Office of Architectural Design
15231 Alton Parkway, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
APPLICANT:

PACIFIC

INDUSTRIAL
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
EMAIL:

PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

YUCAIPA, CA
SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 2
SD
MARK
11/19/21

PLANNING SUBMITTAL SET
DATE

DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-1A2-1
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE

VICINITY MAP
I-7
SITE
yJ. WWI
01E 1'5-

VICINITY MAP
NTS
•
LAND USE:

SINGLE RESIDENTIAL
C25

EXISTING BUILDING
78 LF FROM PL
•
LAND USE:

MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL
4(P
/
itiiiiik°41\ftft\
/
01‘---r
olliftir L14
L15 •'I//.r._
!� �+ �r +
/ate
LAND USE:

GENERAL COMMERCIAL
/'L16
\ , + - C23=-JPi
\ �\ C26 +
LAND USE:

OPEN SPACE
/ I
LL3�9
7,..
/

EXISTING BUILDING
12 LF FROM PL
L12
;��CC ��;^ �34\ L3// //� J z \ 1
iii))//(()/. /kik- /If/ -
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN
AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

GOVERNMENT LOTS 3 AND 4 OF

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SU

BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, IN THE
SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN
RVEY, IN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, AND LOTS 2, 3, 4, 5,
BERNARDINO, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 7, PAGE 2 OF MAPS, IN THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. // 1_13

FUTURE ROAD ACCESS
(NOT A PART OF PROJECT - ROAD
DESIGN SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING'\

UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WITH
FURTHER CITY APPROVAL REQUIRED.) -

EXISTING BUILDING
115 LF FROM PL
YB -4
LAND USE:

GENERAL COMMERCIAL
7 j\ PARCEL 2
�� + _ FUTURE RESIDENTIAL
-L26-
+ ` -- �/�'L - _+

ROPOSED
_ - - ten_�,i� 217
��/�' PARCEL 5 PUBLIC ROAD 5
� ���,��\� �" 11 � � �
(I( I EXISTING SITE

OPEN SPACE
2175�
1 \�
OPEN SP ACEi-_C
f _.__�-`_�✓��
///
,L44 (
L �% / / / /
/ /
^ t] .' `,\
/L76 - L7504'633._C32'
\ 7•`\c�`I
/ L42-
i �� � `�v -2050 = LAND USE: p/� �� �//i�\� %��! �� OPEN SPACE

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO
7, 8 AND 9 OF BLOCK 79 OF RANCHO SAN

YUCAIPA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 7, 8 AND 9 OF SAID BLOCK 79 OF RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO WHICH LIES NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF U.S. INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 10 AS SAID SOUTHERLY LINE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BY DEEDS RECORDED JUNE 03, 1949 IN BOOK 2412, PAGE 156, RECORDED IN BOOK 3730, PAGE 306, AND RECORDED APRIL 19, 1962 IN BOOK 5684, PAGE 977, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY.

ALSO EXCEPTING THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 4, 5 AND 7 OF SAID BLOCK 79 WHICH LIES WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF LIVE OAK CANYON ROAD AS ESTABLISHED JULY 1950 BY THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SURVEYOR.

ALSO EXCEPTING FROM LOT 7 IN SAID BLOCK 79 THAT PORTION OF LIVE OAK CANYON ROAD AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO BY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 09, 1984 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 84-269725 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

ALSO EXCEPTING FROM LOTS 4 AND 5 OF SAID BLOCK 79 THOSE PORTIONS WHICH LIE SOUTH AND WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:

COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 79, OF SAID RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, WHICH IS NORTH 89°54'15" EAST 1618.66 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SAID LINE WITH THE LINE BETWEEN SECTIONS 8 AND 9, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN

BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO GOVERNMENT SURVEY, SAID POINT BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND CONVEYED BY H. S. POWERS TO BREEDING FARM AND HATCHERY COMPANY, BY DEED DATED JUNE 05, 1950 AND RECORDED IN BOOK 2589, PAGE 552 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LAND, NORTH 27°56'45" WEST 1076.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85°58'45" WEST 666.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01°51'15" EAST 252.22 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82°53'45" WEST 293.90 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO MARSHALL G. RICHARDSON, ET UX., BY DEED FROM HERSCHEL S. POWERS AND WIFE, DATED JANUARY 08, 1954 AND RECORDED JANUARY 25, 1954 IN BOOK 3316, PAGE 18 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, NORTH 25°49' EAST, 90.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44°09' WEST 160.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02°20' WEST 138.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23°20' EAST 111.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°20' WEST 581 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE CENTER LINE OF LIVE OAK CANYON ROAD.

ALSO EXCEPTING FROM LOTS 2 AND 9 OF SAID BLOCK 79 OF RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO AND GOVERNMENT LOT 3 OF SECTION 10 THOSE PORTIONS LYING EASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:

BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 3, BEARING SOUTH 89°38'45" WEST, 1084.31 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 10°38'43" WEST, 272.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°54'32" EAST, 749.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 26°07'02" WEST, 443.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 80°38'14" WEST, 188.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 21 °58'28" WEST, 1112.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11 °02'30" EAST, 648.68 FEET; THENCE NORTH 38°38'03" WEST, 407.10 FEET; THENCE NORTH 03°23'58" WEST, 541.62 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID U.S. INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 10.

ALSO EXCEPTING FROM LOTS 2, 3 AND 4 OF SAID BLOCK 79 OF RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO ANDGOVERNMENT LOT 4 OF SECTION 10 THOSE PORTIONS DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 9-TP-1 IN EXHIBIT "A", AS CONDEMNED BY THE YUCAIPA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, IN THAT "ORDER CORRECTING ERRORS AND AMENDING JUDGMENT", RECORDED MAY 28, 1992 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 92-224083 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (NOTE: SAID ORDER AMENDED THAT FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED MAY 15, 1981 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 81-107293 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.)
ALSO EXCEPTING FROM LOTS 4 AND 5 OF SAID BLOCK 79 THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND LYING WITHIN AN 88 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO BY GRANT DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 09, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-426315 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM A PORTION OF SAID LOT 7 OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND WHICH WAS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO IN DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 09, 1984 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 84-269725 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

ALSO EXCEPTING THOSE PORTIONS CONDEMNED IN FEE, IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, BY FINAL ORDER OF SCVSS146785, A CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF BEING RECORDED JANUARY 19, 2012 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 21483, AND 2013 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 427523, AND BY AMENDED FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED JUNE 01, 2018 2018-0199960, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE YUCAIPA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC AGENCY OF THE DEED RECORDED APRIL 09, 2014 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 125397 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

CONDEMNATION, CASE NO.

RECORDED OCTOBER 01,
AS INSTRUMENT NO.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION OF SAID LAND LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF PARCEL MAP NO. 19967, IN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 251 PAGES 33 THROUGH 36, INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

APN: 0301-201-40, -41 & -42, 0301-211-10 & -12, 0301-221-10, 0301-201-26, 0301-191-21 2135�^ �+

EXISTING SITE

OPEN SPACE
L45
1 0

INTERSTATE HIGHWAY
L� 'L% / --
�- a / / 7 --_,\
- -/ _/ / / {
\ ---7.7 / / `� - 1'
/ / / -----�
—: / -
—
/
-
4-
•
)11(4)' I j
1)1)111 g^,\�\�'r+►�.»`'
\\ s

UTILITY COMPANIES

TELEPHONE AT&T
(844) 723 — 0252

ELECTRIC
SEWER
WATER

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
(800) 655-4555

YUCAIPA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
YUCAIPA, CA 92399
(909) 797-5117

YUCAIPA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
YUCAIPA, CA 92399
(909) 797-5117

STORM SEWER YUCAIPA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
YUCAIPA, CA 92399
(909) 797-5117
GAS
LEGEND

SOCAL GAS
(909) 307-7070
2166

UTILITY LEGEND

PROPERTY LINE

EASEMENT LINE

STREET CENTERLINE

PROPOSED CONTOUR

EXISTING CONTOUR

TERRIS DRAIN

PAVEMENT

HYDROSEED

LANDSCAPING
iR
—FW

PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER LINE

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE

PROPOSED IRRIGATION LINE

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE

PROPOSED FIRE WATER LINE

PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT
8 TYP.
1INIIII1111

WAREHOUSE
BUILDING 1
1,052,500 SF
178 DOCK POSITIONS
410 TRAILER STALLS
515 AUTO STALLS

SPRINKLER
MAX HEIGHT 62 FT

CONSTRUCTION TYPE III-B
-4\ r
LAND USE:

PUBLIC FACILITY
C30
-----14e11111114k\ q‘112->"1.-

PUBLIC ROAD NOTE

PUBLIC ROAD FUTURE ALIGNMENT
PENDING CITY COORDINATION.

PUBLIC STREET LENGTH 6,801'.

EXISTING STRUCTURES

ALL EXISTING BEEHIVES ENCOUNTERED
TO BE REMOVED PROPERLY.

STRUCTURES
1111111111111111111111111111
NO EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN 30' OF PROJECT

NO EXISTING STRUCTURES ON PROJECT SITE

FIRE WATER NOTES

PROPERTY
0 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT.

DOMESTIC WATER
INSTALL BACKFLOW IN CAGE.

INSTALL 12" DOMESTIC WATER PIPE.

BUILDING POINT OF CONNECTION.

INSTALL DOMESTIC WATER METER.

WATER MAIN LINE TO BE BORED UNDER HIGHWAY.

SANITARY SEWER
0 INSTALL SEWER LATERAL.
@ CONNECT TO EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER
0 BUILDING POINT OF CONNECTION.

STORM DRAIN
SYSTEM.
cp
cp
cp
cp

IRRIGATION WATER
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN.

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPELINE.

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LATERAL.

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN DETENTION SYSTEM.

PROPOSED DEBRIS BASIN.

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN OUTLET STRUCTURE.

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE.
e TIE INTO PROPOSED WATER LINE.
0 INSTALL 3" DOMESTIC WATER METER.
@ INSTALL 3" BACKFLOW IN CAGE.
//Nk__
0+ +71.▪ 0▪ 41,:+77-1:11,:/-r
07: \ )_ 0://5//+vga to a k
49 7/Y)
4 TYP.

ON )
\\\\\1,4 :-/;k )

PARKING
(SEE PARCEL DESCRIPTION NOTE)
•
LAND USE:

SINGLE FAMILY
,4;;__,, \i/;=7----/--/ ,
-'9°611"'ll (I- \ `-\‘'./-
,.:_rici .5,2) ) ) / / ,.

TRAF-1- ENCLOS/PURI-_-‘--H-\,)\ j
' --jj/fr-7/ "'>-12:1/N/5-DJ/1/"UeL----S''N\;* --C-

OPEN SPACE
BUILDING 2
1,001,500 SF
178 DOCK POSITIONS
326 TRAILER STALLS
471 AUTO STALLS

SPRINKLER
MAX HEIGHT 62 FT

CONSTRUCTION TYPE III-B
PARCEL 7

WAREHOUSE

EXISTING SITE

OPEN SPACE
PARCEL DESCRIPTION '')41--744.)/
PARCEL 2 = 32.04 AC. (GROSS)
PARCEL 6* = 29.68 AC. (GROSS)
TOTAL AREA = 312.91 AC. (GROSS)
*CONDITIONED TO REQUIRE PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBLE IMPROVEMENTS IF

BUILDING SETBACKS
(
L52
UTILIZED BY BUILDING 2 (PARCEL 7)
PROPOSED: IB ZONE
FRONT SETBACK: 15'
REAR AND SIDE SETBACK: 10'

ACCESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS
0301-201-40, —41 & —42, 031-211-10 & —12,
0301-201-26, 0301-191-21

PROPOSED SITE BREAKDOWN
LANDSCAPE: 68%
PAVED: 17%
BUILDING: 15%

EXISTING EASEMENTS
12 16
23 SLOPE EASEMENT TO YUCAIPA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT PER RECORDING NO. 81-107293

SLOPE EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PER
RECORDING NO. 89-426317
ACCESS EASEMENT PER RECORDING NO. 2018-0448807

LAND USE
EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT
PROPOSED LAND USE: WAREHOUSE / FUTURE RESIDENTIAL

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
EXISTING LAND USE: OPEN SPACE / SINGLE RESIDENTIAL / MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED LAND USE: OPEN SPACE / BUSINESS PARK / MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL

LINE TABLE

LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING
\:\
>,..74c4ctri jitoff(/_Thr.,//

PROJECT DATA

LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING
L78
214.92
S5215'03.88"E

LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING

SITE AREA

BUILDING AREA

COVERAGE

BUIDING AREA BY USE
OFFICE

VVAREHOUSE

AUTO PAW NG

RED U I RED PARKING
OFFICE

WAREHOUSE

TOTAL REQ I RED
BUILDING 1
2,625.332 SF

60.270 AC
1,C62,500 SF

20.000 SF
1,032.50D SF

PARKING PROVIDED

STANDARD STALLS

ADA STALLS

EV STALLS

TOTAL PROVIDED

1.113
452
11 2,838,221
TOTAL
5,4n.1303 SF

25.42T AC_
1,001,500 SF
20,D00 SF 40,000 SF
961,500 SF 2;014.000 SF
•s,

DOCK LOADING ZONES

REQUIRED

PROVIDED
813
160
41 3
10 866
471 986

TRAILER PARKING

PROVIDED
118
410

LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING
L52
564.77
S8912'16.54"W

CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
DELTA

CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
DELTA

LAND OWNER

PALMER GENERAL CORPORATION
32335 LIVE OAK CANYON RD
REDLANDS, CA 92373
(909)-534-6958

APPLICANT

PI DEVELOPMENT, LLC
6272 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, STE E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
(714) 717-7843

SURVEYOR
PBLA SURVEYING, INC.

REDLANDS, CA 92373
(888) 714-9672

CIVIL ENGINEER

JACOB GLAZE
KIMLEY—HORN
1100 W TOWN AND COUNTRY, SUITE 700
ORANGE, CA 92868
(714) 705-1374
R G A
n
,
,
R A
0 A
0 R
\
R
•
,
,
,
,
,
0 ,,
.
fEss,o,
,,, s. ,,,
4,,,_
C 87934
ii. civIk,
ri
7°
*
Kim ley >>>
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
FX 949-341-0922
orn
noo w. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
CO\Ch
PIL
AL
v,,cA
OVh
pA
HALL
C A
SIT-
PLA\
M
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SCALE: 1" = 200'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
S /
<., 0

GRAD
\> 0\ S
/i
LEGEND
/ O
4 + + + + + + +
i �// i `\`\ + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1pf":17-"_--%:-
+ + + + + r + + + + + + + + + + + + +
OO/ : ' + + + + + + + + + + I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -\ - + + + + + + + + + + + + + +I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + tifv+ + + + + + + +j + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + f + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �+ + + + / + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + II + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + f/+ + 7—+ —7- 7—+ — i—r .4—_+ — - _.__+ + + + + + + + + + + +`' + + + + fj + + + +, + + + + + + + �+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + � + + + + + + + + %--+ + + + + $- +� �+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I + + + + + + __+ + + + l� + + + f'+ + + + + �/+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + / +---- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I + + +
1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + -�+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +I + 1+ + + + + + + +
+++ +++++ ++++++++1S - CRAD \C P A\ +++ +f++ +/+++++ ++++ �+ ...----F__i___ +-____A + + + + + + + + + +
I- I-T G2.0
\G PLA\
++++++
+ + + + + + + + i + + + + + + +� + + + + 1 1 + + + 1 + — + �:�++++++�, ++++++ +`++++++ + + +
/ + + + + + + + + ++ + + + L + + + + + + +` \ + + + + + + + -L + + + + + + / + + + 0 \+ ++ +++++�++++ ++
v , + + + + + + + + + + I+ + + + + +� + + + + + + + + +\ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ + + + + + + + + +� + 1+ + +
+ + + + + + - + + + + + + \ + + + + + + + + +� + + +
+ + + + + + + 11-1-17_11111-
+ + + + +� + ++ + + +� + +
:: + +
+ + + + + + + + +
=%/
+ + + + + + + + + +
+__-+_--f + + + + + + + + +
--________________ + + + + + + + + +••••
+ + + + + +
‘ \ + + + + + +
/ '' + + + + + + + +
•
"1.

PROPERTY LINE

EASEMENT LINE

STREET CENTERLINE

SECTION OUTLINE

TERRIS DRAIN

PAVEMENT

HYDROSEED

LANDSCAPING
+ + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + +
+ +
+ + + +
+ + + + +
+ + + + +
+ H

JIIIIIIIII
1 S- h GRAD
0\ S
\7 PLA\
G4.0
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + +
-r + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + +
+ + + + +
Hil
SH- GRAD \C PLA\
0\ S T C50
+""-
+ + + + + + +
•
N.
+ + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
W Wa' W
+ + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + +
n
+ + + + + + + + + + + +vvv
+ + + + + + + + + + +
�• \ + + + + + + + + + + +
;' -► - �M + + + + +
e
+ + + + + +
+ r + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + +
+ + T
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + I
+
+
+

SH- GRAD
0\ S
SH- GRAD \G PLA\
0\ S T G6.0
. + + + + ♦\ --'+ - + + + +
\G PLA\
G5.0
+ + +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+
SH- GRAD \C PLA\
ON S G/.0
+
H , A
,
,
,
,
p A
0 A
\
R
■
�/
�/
�/
.
��o �oFs ss i c A� F
ti

4.),
,_„.

C
*� _8
\nT
9i.F o \Fo�`�
F CAL
A
Q
Kimiey*
_0 _
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
or no
© 2021 KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1100 W. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
C 0\
C
R
P
T
A
D
C
„,
C A
R A
D
P
\
A C A
9 C OM-
H A
L
L
P
L A\
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 100 200 400
SCALE: 1" = 200'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE

-17
7 -
/ 7
J
r
7 /
1996.52-FS
1996.48 TC
/1995.98-FL
/1996.15 LIP
/ 1996.55'HP
1996.48,TC
\1995.98 FL'
1996.15 LIP
1996.52 FS
i
I\ \\
/ \ \
\
� 1 I
/
/
POLE
(
//
1998.21 FS
2001.24'TC
2000.74,FL
2000.85,LIP
1998.25 HP
1998.19 TC
1997.69 FL 1
2000.85-LIP
1998.22 FS
/
2050.00-FS
7 ----
7 �7 7
7"
N
/ 0 (- / /// X/ / ---_ - .___.7Z/ 70„ ----
I I \Hit( ( /7 / /
//, r/
///
//ri /(/+
/ /
/
-2019.90 FS
2019.87 TC
2019.37:FL
/
/ </ //7
/ / ///"//)/
2100.00 FS
7 /
N.
2100.00-FS
-
/
203577 LIP
2-2036.17 HP-
- 2036.11TC
2/097.25 FS
2040.90 FS
,2040.37 FL
/
2050.00 FS
/
2250.00 FS
j
2097.25 FS
2150.00
FS
/2052.79 FS
2052.77 TC
\12052.27 FL
2052.44 LIP
2052.79 FS
7 7-
LEGEND
2166
GB
TR
TW
TC
FS
TS
BS
HP
(2166.50 TC)
2166.50 TC

PROPERTY LINE

EASEMENT LINE

STREET CENTERLINE

PROPOSED CONTOURS

EXISTING CONTOURS

PROPOSED GRADE BREAK

PROPOSED RIDGE

DAYLIGHT LINE

TOP OF RAMP

TOP OF WALL

TOP OF CURB

FINISHED SURFACE

TOP OF STAIRS

BOTTOM OF STAIRS

HIGH POINT

EXISTING GRADE

PROPOSED GRADE

TERRIS DRAIN

PAVEMENT

HYDROSEED

LANDSCAPING

PROPOSED SLOPE
,0,Ess,„..

R G A
n
,
,
P A
0 A
S
0 \
R
•
,,,,, s. 0,,,
, ,,,
Kimley*
__, __, __, __,
.,
c,_,
,,
,,...,,,.
_.70,
„,..z..
,
C 87934
Civ\V-
,,,
ri
m
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
FX 949-341-0922
orn
no° w. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
CO\CI-DM__}AL
GRAD
v„,cA
\G
pA
A\D
CA
DRA
\AGI-
_)
LA\
1 M
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 30 60 120
SCALE: 1" = 60'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
__)
<,
0 /
/)
/
2159.12-TC
2158.62 FS
2158.79 TC
2158.29-FS
2162.07 TC
_ ��\ _
- ,� ,_� \\\\
2--- \ \
-t-
vfr
,��N► vati,�� 2217.00.FS�
2217.00.FS \ 2163.35,FS
\ 7/
N N- 7/
N
_` /
W W w \\ 2161.35TC
2160.85 FS
2161.85 TC
v
I vfr
2161.35 FS
2166.00 FS
vp vfr
2165.72 TC
r_2165., 2 FS
2185
7 7-
jj////// -
-7/ /
I l I I I 1 1 \---/ /// /\„ \\ \‘09,\\
\\ \\ \NN J// I I I I I \/ / / / //e,//// I \\ \2 // // \ \ I i 1�\\\ //// / ///�/ \ \���// �- III �� / \\ \ N
/4/////// ///f/i
uuuuuuuuu \\\\\\\\\ .
uu� 1_1- Li u �lu ur2185�-�.s� �� \\
Lam' �� 14.1
\\\ \\218p=2175= i'
2166.00 TW
2166.00 FS
/-
\
\ /
// ice-- /////�%j//
/ --/ ///ice /
/ �e-- i
'�////-�' /i i jam/
/ i-/ /i/�//
i
N
2165.85 TC
2141:28.FS ,315
2145
111:1.L41.111-4111111111111P
-
2162.00 TC 2162.00 FS
/
2161.40 FS
2158.02 FS/
2157.97 TC
// //7 -===----"_)/-/ -----------1 »ill 1 L -,D.,D
..."--------11-..\ \ \ ) / I /) /1 I ) / / / / \\_---- ---,-. \"<,--\ \\ \ \ \ --, 215 220
kic Nz \\ -7- °---N\ 'c-)N
- 2230-
/
FFE: 2166.00
MEBBEImmuniaimw
777//z7z;777777 z 7
\ -
\\ \\\\\\\\II\\1\< /( // //
\\\
1\\\
/ /
// TN,"\ 2220-
/
/
) (N \\\\\\\\ \ ; I
2144.54 FS
2144.34 TC
160
2145.23:TC
2143.27 TC
\2162.00 FS
/;2161.40\FS \
2161.40 FS
2152.43-FS
2151.90
2151.06 LIP
2152.46 HP
2152.40 TC
2151.06:LIP
-2144.91 FS-
2145.63 TC
2145.13 FS
/
H
,k--ri 0 :/
Li/ i_..1 I M i - - - - - A \ I
7- , _ _ _, 7----___--------\_?///----1:/// 7/7 \-\\'\\ ▪ NN\ \\ \N\ \ -7- 2146.21FS
2146.18 TC
2145.68 FL
2145.85 LIP
2145.68-FL
2145
/
2161.35 TC
2160.85 FS
2161.35 FS
'2162.00 FS
-7 \ \ \ A\ \ \ \ \
2150.72.HP
2149.43 FS 2150.32 LIP
0" CURB
2150.68 FS

49.40-TC
2149.46 HP
2148.90 FL
2149.06 LIP
2149.43 FS
2161.75 TC
2161.25 FS
2160.10 TC
2159.60 FS
2153.79 FS
2153.43 LIP
2152.43 FS
2152.45 FS
±92.0'

5.0'
LEGEND
2166
GB
TR
TW
TC
FS
TS
BS
HP
(2166.50 TC)
2166.50 TC
2166.00 FS
X.X%

44.0'

PROPERTY LINE

EASEMENT LINE

STREET CENTERLINE

PROPOSED CONTOURS

EXISTING CONTOURS

PROPOSED GRADE BREAK

PROPOSED RIDGE

DAYLIGHT LINE

TOP OF RAMP

TOP OF WALL

TOP OF CURB

FINISHED SURFACE

TOP OF STAIRS

BOTTOM OF STAIRS

HIGH POINT

EXISTING GRADE

PROPOSED GRADE

TERRIS DRAIN

PAVEMENT

HYDROSEED

LANDSCAPING

PROPOSED SLOPE

PROPOSED HYDROSEED

PROPOSED

HYDROSEED

5.0'

PROPOSED
TERRA
DRAIN

PROPOSED
TERRA
DRAIN

PROPOSED ROAD

6.0' 5.0'

PROPOSED

SIDEWALK

B-B SECTION

NOT TO SCALE

44.0'

PROPOSED ROAD

6.0'

PROPOSED

SIDEWALK

5.0'

PROPOSED
TERRA
DRAIN

C-C SECTION

NOT TO SCALE
,0,Ess,„..

R G A
n
,
,
R A
0 A
S
0 \
R
•
,,,,, s. 0,,,
, ,,,
Kimley*
__, __, __, __,
.,
c,_,
,,
,,...,,,.
_.70,
v.,..z..
,,,,
C 87934
Civ1V-
ri
m
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
FX 949-341-0922
orn
no° w. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
CO\C-PTLAL
GRAD
v„,cA
\G
PA
A\D
CA
DRAI\ACh
PLA\
J
M
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION

PROPOSED
TERRA
DRAIN

PROPOSED LANDSCAPE

PROPOSED LANDSCAPE

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 30 60 120
SCALE: 1" = 60'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
0 __) \-6 <,

LEGEND
—
7 /
/
/
/
—
/
/
/
— 7
/
/
/
/
r
/
/
/
-
/
/
/
-
/
L
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
\
/
/7
\
/
\
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
—
-/
/
/
x
Z�
/1� / / //' //' -
// / / / // �/' '
%///'./
/
i /
/
'
' /� /J/'
i , //
7 �_______
\ ti+//' /- //-
((
0 rN
/
/\
r
/7
i
i
i
7-
i
7-
/ ~
//r
/
_
/
/\
/
/1I
///
I/ 1,/
/// /k
//
�//
/,7
, i _),o /)�
"-
—
-
J
7 /
, // ////
)
0 /
/ /
7/7
J
—
-
N
-
-
ir
/
cc'il il :Til Rill M\ \ I L ()\ ' L- (---)" - -1 \
0 LO-H\)\ l; ii.o47-\\\\
V \\ \\
/
� `L
2130 2135
2140
21,2145
2166
GB
TR
TW
TC
FS
TS
BS
HP
(2166.50 TC)
2166.50 TC
2166.00 FS
X.X%

PROPERTY LINE

EASEMENT LINE

STREET CENTERLINE

PROPOSED CONTOURS

EXISTING CONTOURS

PROPOSED GRADE BREAK

PROPOSED RIDGE

DAYLIGHT LINE

TOP OF RAMP

TOP OF WALL

TOP OF CURB

FINISHED SURFACE

TOP OF STAIRS

BOTTOM OF STAIRS

HIGH POINT

EXISTING GRADE

PROPOSED GRADE

TERRIS DRAIN

PAVEMENT

HYDROSEED

LANDSCAPING

PROPOSED SLOPE
/
,0,Ess,„..

R G A
n
,
,
P A
0 A
S
0 \
R
•
,,,,, s. 0,,,,,
, ,,,
Kimley*
__, __, __, __,
.,
c,_,
,,
,,...,,,.
_.70,
r,„..
,,,,
C 87934
Civ1V-
ri
m
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
FX 949-341-0922
orn
no° w. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
CO\
a
DT
j
AL
GRAD
v„,cA
\G
PA
A\D
CA
DRA
\AGI-
D
LA\
4 M
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SCALE: 1" = 60'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE

4. 0
__)