CITY OF
AGENDA REPORT
Item No. 28
DATE: June 9, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Fermin Preciado, Director of Development Services/City Engineer Benjamin Matlock, Deputy Director of Community Development/City Planner/li✓^ SUBJECT: Annual Adjustment of Development Impact Fees (Continued from May 12, 2025, City Council Meeting)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council conduct a public hearing and:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-09, rescinding Resolution No. 2022-59, and amending Resolution No. 93-39, establishing a schedule of revised Development Impact Fees; and
2. Authorize the reduction of the Public Facilities DIF fund interfund borrowing by $6,400,000.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The City's current Development Impact Fee (DIF) program was initially adopted in 1993 in order to provide a stable source of funding for the infrastructure improvements that would be needed to support new development, and consequently, these fees were assessed to all properties that were determined to be vacant at that time. Any properties with existing structural improvements were considered in the DIF program and, in order to ensure that there were no disincentives that could adversely affect the potential for their reuse, are credited towards the cost of the new development.
Each year, the fees are adjusted to ensure that future DIF revenues keep pace with inflation and other associated costs to fund the estimated construction costs in the applicable DIF categories. The process allows for the fees that are collected to fully satisfy the total amount of costs that will be incurred over the life of the program, and that the City will have the financial resources to implement the projects listed within the DIF program. The fees that are collected also represent each development project's fair share cost to the City. The last update to the DIF program occurred at the City Council Meeting of March 13, 2023, which featured a notable change to the City's DIF approach to best meet the requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 602. Specifically, this new law required a sq ft.-based approach rather than the City's historical "per unit" approach and is meant to best provide a fair assessment of the DIFs calculated for a project (for example, it better recognizes that a 900 square foot home would have fewer overall impacts to City public facilities than a 3,500 square foot home). As part of the 2023 update, an impact fee nexus study was completed and the
underlying calculations for the DIF program were enhanced to accommodate the adjustments for each subsequent year.
The proposed annual update to the DIFs is consistent with the provisions of Ordinance No. 50, which contains the City's regulations for establishing a comprehensive system of DIFs.
Adjustments Made to Prior Year's DIF:
To develop the annual update to the City's DIF program, several different factors are adjusted to ensure that the DIF program reflects the most current and accurate assessment of the future project costs and to ensure that DIFs levied on new projects best represent the fair share cost burden. The updates include anticipated future project costs, with an adjustment that corresponds to the change in the Construction Cost Index (CCI), updates to the total number of dwelling units or acres that have changed for future development, and incorporation of any other future project details, such as grant funding, that has the potential to impact the overall project costs that are included in the DIF program.
Construction Cost Index:
One of the primary metrics used for the annual DIF update is to adjust the various project costs by the change in the CCI to account for the changes in construction and material costs that have occurred due to inflation. The average change in CCI for the Southern California -Los Angeles region, which has served as the basis for the annual inflationary adjustment, was 5.7% over the past fiscal year, which is a significant increase for a single year, but remains less than the prior year's 8.7%. Supply limitations and material cost increases continue to drive the costs for construction projects, which subsequently impacts all the future DIF-related projects. For most of the projects listed in the DIF, the CCI is the only adjustment made to the expected project costs. However, exceptions to this single adjustment factor are provided where new information on the anticipated project cost become known, and any applicable adjustments are identified in subsequent subsections of this report.
Further, it should be noted that an inflationary increase in all applicable program expenses was also made to ensure that the cost of the facilities that have been previously built remains consistent with the inflated costs of the facilities that remain to be built in the various program calculations.
Project Cost Adjustments:
As noted previously, the typical approach to the DIF update is to adjust project costs by the change in the CCI to correspond to how inflation will impact the anticipated project costs in the future.
However, as the City continues to develop the different infrastructure projects within the DIF program, more accurate project costs may become available, and should then be incorporated into the DIF to provide a better representation of future costs. For this current update, additional project costs for drainage and transportation projects were identified. Further, while the CCI increased at a relatively moderate rate compared to prior years, the individual costs of certain materials, as well as land acquisition costs, have varied wildly. These fluctuations have created notable impacts for the anticipated costs for future projects.
DIF Collection in 2024:
Adjustments have been made for the number of dwelling units or acres that have already been developed, as well as for the funds that have already been collected, deferred, spent, or credited to ensure that the fees that remain to be collected will equal the projected cost of the facilities that remain to be built. Factors that contributed to the varying decreases or increases in DIFs are the changes in the amount of funds collected or deferred, referred to as the 'cash on hand,' in conjunction with the amount expended on projects. For the prior fiscal year, the following amounts have been collected:
Fee Type
Amount
Drainage
$4 1 1,108
Park
$148,571
Fire
$125,653
Circulation
$1,831,164
Public
$729,133
Total
S3,245,629
However, some of the DIF accounts have existing loans from the General Fund that are still being repaid. In those cases, the final loan total as identified in the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report was used. To fully account for all of the changes regarding the future levels of development, the number of acres and dwelling units remaining to be developed has been revised to reflect the building permits issued for 89 new dwelling units and 269,725 square feet of commercial development and 383,748 square feet of industrial development that occurred in Fiscal Year 2023-24 (FY24).
Historically, it was assumed that the interest that was earned on the fees that were collected, but not yet spent, would offset a significant portion of the annual CCI increase. In past periods, when the CCI was relatively minor and interest rates were higher, this had sometimes been true. However, in the past decade, the interest income has been insufficient to offset the projected cost increases, and the CCI increase has been necessary to ensure the full recovery of all anticipated costs.
Anticipated New Development Build -Out Adjustment:
The DIF program is designed to take the total construction costs to implement the DIF projects, subtract the share reflecting the financial obligation to existing residents, and then divide the remaining cost by the total buildout that is projected for the City to create the individual costs. As these development projects that have the potential to impact the total projected build -out for the City occur, these adjustments are then incorporated in the DIF assessment. The proposed DIF program provides for the build out calculations from the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (FCSP) update previously reviewed by Council, as well the projected residential units listed in the City's adopted and certified Housing Element. A few minor General Plan Amendments that had been recently approved, which nominally changed the City's total buildout projection, were also included. It should be noted that if development falls short of what was planned, then the DIF program would not collect adequate funding to sustain the previously -constructed or planned projects.
Grant Funding Adjustments:
There are several grant funding opportunities from federal, state, and local sources that may be available for certain projects, and staff believes that it is appropriate to include a portion of this anticipated revenue in their respective calculations. The DIF calculation includes the cost share for new development, but certain categories may also include the share for existing development (recognizing that the infrastructure also provides direct a benefit for existing development's needs), and these grants are therefore allocated as appropriate based on the nexus study requirements. For future grants, the actual amount of potential grant revenue that staff is proposing for the calculation is typically discounted by a "likelihood -of -obtaining" factor to reflect the possibility of obtaining funding, and grants are only included if there is a relatively high probability (50% or more) of being realized in the near term. Based on staff's assessment of likely success for the grant, the anticipated revenue is also further reduced. For grant funding that has been awarded and has already been received by the City for certain projects, 100% of those grant funds are discounted in the calculation.
Using this conservative approach will help ensure that the DIF program remains on a sound fmancial basis while reducing the overall fees, as staff will only be counting revenue that has been received or is very likely to receive to offset the net cost.
General Fund Contributions:
As noted previously, the City's General Fund has provided funding to the City's DIF program to help construct infrastructure projects earlier with the expressed purpose of encouraging future development to occur and to also help resolve existing deficiencies in the infrastructure. The General Fund contributions were categorized as an outstanding loan and a formal repayment plan was established. However, not every project established through the DIF program is meant to be 100% funded through new development — existing development participates in the project costs of certain projects. One such project was the Yucaipa Performing Arts Center, funded through the City's Public Facilities DIF account. Of the entire $16,672,658 project cost for the facility, approximately $6,400,000 was funded through a General Fund contribution. Staff is recommending removing this amount from the interfund receivable balance. Updating this component would ensure that the "fair share" distribution is correct. This "write -down" also translates into a reduction of General Fund fund balance. This recommendation was reviewed by the Finance Committee at their April 21, 2025, meeting.
2025 DIF Schedule:
The recommended adjustments, identified above, create a net effect of amending each category that comprises the DIF schedule. The change in DIF amounts between the previous year and the proposed fees are summarized in the DIF comparison table below.
DIF Comparison 2023 to 2025
2023 DIF 2025
DIF Existing Proposed
Program Residential Residential
(per d.u.) (per d.u.)
Draina . e
Traffic
3,574.74
10,098.95
4, 244.04
10,994.90
2023 DIF
Existing
Commercial
(per acre)
15,226.94
61.853.17
2025 DIF
Proposed
Commercial
(per acre)
2023 DIF
Existing
Industrial
(per acre)
18,077.90
15,226.94
68, 037.82
70, 593.29
2025 DIF
Proposed
Industrial
(per acre)
18,077.90
77,651.86
DIF Comparison 2023 to 2025
DIF
Program
Public
Facilities
2023 DIF
Existing
Residential
(per d.u.)
2,143.88
2025
Proposed
Residential
(per d.u.)
2,738.26
2023 DIF
Existing
Commercial
(per acre)
12,686.59
2025 DIF
Proposed
Commercial
(per acre)
16,371.67
2023 DIF
Existing
Industrial
(per acre)
9,514.94
2025 DIF
Proposed
Industrial
(per acre)
12,278.75
Fire
1,264.57
1,426.76
7,483.24
8,530.44
5,612.43
6,397.83
Park
3,094.72
3,763.86
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
$20,285.65
$23,167.82
$97,893.68
$111,017.82
$101,430.41
$114,406.34
%+/-
14.21%
13.41%
12.79%
Notes: Residential fees assume a 2,252 sq ft single-family residence on a 10,000 square foot lot, and commercial and Industrial fees assume a 16,504 square foot building on an acre lot consistent with the 2023 fee schedule.
With the expected increases in project delivery costs identified over the past two years, along with the typical calculations that are included each year, there is a notable increase in the DIF rates. As presented in prior Council reports regarding future City projects, such as the new library and Wildwood Basin 4, the current market is not favorable for certain Capital Improvement Projects to be constructed at this time. The rate for the DIF needs to hedge against the total cost of these projects, but additional work and timing is also needed from the City to help reduce the overall project costs and/or prioritize future improvements through the City's Strategic Plan process. It should be noted that without the interfund balance correction, the rate increases would instead be 16.8%, 16.6%, and
15.1 %, respectively.
Despite the DIF rate increase, the City -specific rates remain competitive with our surrounding jurisdictions. While the DIF schedules for other cities are not a determining factor for what a city should charge for their fees, it does provide a frame of reference to ensure that one city's program remains competitive and comparable to the region. In comparison with neighboring cities' DIF amounts, the City -specific fees for residential development are in the bottom one-third of the other nearby cities surveyed. In addition, the City's commercial/industrial DIF amounts are still much lower than most of the other cities (second lowest). As noted in prior Council discussions, the combination of outside agency fees (school district, water and sewer fees) unfortunately pushes the overall residential development cost in Yucaipa to be one of the more expensive in the region.
Ultimately, these other fees are at the discretion of other entities, and like the City, are meant to address their own unique infrastructure demands. However, the combined fees for commercial and industrial projects remain one of the lowest. The comparison is provided below for Council's reference of the surrounding Cities' fees.
DEVELOPMENT FEE COMPARISON'
2,252 SQ. FT. Residence on 10,000 Sq. Ft. Lot
A.
B.
C.
D2
E.
F.2
G.2
$12,093.92
$26,208.00
$36,933.00
$17,211.00
$30,431.04
$37,155.00
$23,645.00
Yucaipa $23,167.82
DEVELOPMENT FEE COMPARISON1
16,504 Sq. Ft. Commercial Building on 1 acre
A. $173,853.14
B. $215,191.22
C. $345,742.30
D2 $91,466.92
E. $334,049.21
F.2 $247,953.74
G.2 $315,341.05
Yucaipa $111,017.82
DEVELOPMENT FEE COMPARISON'
16,504 Sq. Ft. Industrial Building on 1 acre
A. $208,429.02
B. $110,422.57
C. $247,015.37
D2 $74,589.22
E. $165,064.75
F.2 $111,041.45
G.2 $70,912.13
Yucaipa $114,406.34
As part of the notification process for the change in municipal fees, the Building Industry Association (BIA), the Desert Valleys Builders Association and utility companies were notified of 1 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees are applied for Riverside County jurisdictions.
2 City fees are outdated and out of compliance with state law
the public hearing date for the Development Impact Fee review by Council. To date, no comments have been received from either the utility companies or the two building associations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The schedule of revised Development Impact Fees in Recommendation 1 is projected to generate $274,137,501 over the remaining 30-year life of the program. This revenue will be recognized when collected in the DIF special revenue fund. Recommendation 2 results in a FY25 Fiscal Impact of a $6,400,000 decrease in General Fund fund balance and a corresponding increase in the DIF Capital Projects Fund.
Attachment(s):
1. Resolution No. 2025-09
2. DIF Calculations
Approved by: k..1)c
1 ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2022-59, AND
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 93-39, ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE
OF REVISED DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Yucaipa (the "City Council") has adopted Ordinance No. 50, which establishes a requirement for the payment of development impact fees by new development within the City of Yucaipa (the "City") to ensure that certain public facilities or capital improvements are constructed and made available concurrent with the need caused by new development; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 50 provides that the City Council shall, by resolution, adopt a schedule setting forth the specific amount of development impact fees which will be levied upon new development in the City; describe the benefit and impact area on which the development impact fees are imposed; list the public improvements to be financed; describe the estimated cost of facilities which form the basis for the development impact fee; describe the reasonable relationship between the development impact fee and the various types of new development; and set forth the time for payment of the development impact fee; and WHEREAS, the Development Impact Fee Study prepared by Kadie-Jensen, Johnson & Bodnar, and adopted by Ordinance No. 50, describes the benefit and impact area on which the development impact fees are to be imposed, describes the reasonable relationship between the development impact fee and the various types of new development, analyzes the need for new public facilities and improvements which will be necessitated by future development, sets forth a methodology for determining the relationship between new development, the needed facilities, and the estimated cost of those improvements, and otherwise satisfies the requirements of the law with regard to the imposition and collection of development impact fees; and WHEREAS, Wilbur Smith Associates, professional traffic engineers, prepared a Citywide Traffic Analysis and Mitigation Study, dated April 1993 (the "Citywide Traffic Analysis and Mitigation Study"), and Boyle Engineering, professional civil engineers, prepared a Master Plan of Drainage, dated November 1993 (the "Master Storm Drain Plan"), and the City Fire Chief prepared a Capital Improvements Projection for fire facilities, dated September 2003, the City prepared a revised Public Facilities Plan, dated July 1993 (the "Capital Improvements Projections"), and Robert Bein, William Frost Associates, professional civil engineers, prepared a Drainage & Traffic Impact Fee Assessment Update and Evaluation, dated August 2011 (the "Impact Fee Assessment Update"), which revise and update specific public improvements to be financed through the imposition and collection of the development impact fee and the cost of providing those improvements; and WHEREAS, all such tables which incorporate the revised facilities plans according to the methodology established by Ordinance No. 50 are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated fully herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the facilities and improvement costs analysis of the Citywide Traffic Analysis and Mitigation Study, the Master Storm Drain Plan, the Capital Improvements Projections, and the Impact Fee Assessment Update, taken together with the methodology established by Ordinance No. 50, demonstrate the specific costs associated with providing adequate public facilities commensurate with projected levels of new development; and
WHEREAS, except for projects involving developer reimbursements or credits, the City will determine and provide for sources of additional funds that are attributed to existing residents prior to the construction of any facility for which existing residents have been allocated a share of the cost; and such sources of funding may include, but not be limited to, contributions from the Yucaipa Redevelopment Agency or the City, grants, bonds, and assessment districts or other special tax levies; and
WHEREAS, this City Council desires to assess a proportionate share of the costs for recreational facilities to all new residential developments in order to ensure that all property owners contribute equally towards the mitigation of their impacts by the imposition of an equivalent fee on projects; and
WHEREAS, the Community Services Department of the City of Yucaipa prepared a Capital Improvements Projection, dated October 2005, which demonstrates the specific costs associated with providing adequate recreational facilities commensurate with the projected levels of new development; and
WHEREAS, the City of Yucaipa adopted an update to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan dated October 2016, which demonstrates the recreational facilities commensurate with the projected levels of new development; and
WHEREAS, WLC/Griffin Structures, Inc. prepared a Final Report: Yucaipa Police and Public Library Needs Assessment and Conceptual Site Analysis, dated May 2010, which demonstrates the specific costs associated with providing adequate police administrative facilities and library facilities commensurate with the projected levels of new development; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the 2016 General Plan Update in April 2016; and WHEREAS, an update (Nexus Study) has been prepared by DTA that provides for updated fee calculations that follow the requirements of Assembly Bill 602 in 2023; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 50 provides that the amount of each fee may be revised periodically by resolution of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to rescind Resolution No. 2022-59 and adopt the updated schedule of Development Impact Fees; and
WHEREAS, the "Engineering News Record" Construction Cost Index for the Los Angeles region indicates that construction costs have increased 2.3% since the adoption of the current development impact fees; and
WHEREAS, there are additional information that is provided that may adjust the anticipated costs for future construction projects, and any necessary adjustments shall be made to accommodate these cost adjustment; and
WHEREAS, the development impact fees currently in place must be increased to provide for the construction cost increases identified above; and
WHEREAS, there are additional sources of designated or grant funds presently pending for Traffic Facilities Fee improvements, and because it is not possible to determine the total amount of these funds that are likely to be received by the City each year, or over the course of the General Plan build -out, the adjustment that is made for designated or grant funding shall be evaluated each year to determine if it should be increased or decreased based on changes in expected allocations for the future.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Resolution No. 2022-59 is hereby rescinded.
Section 2. Section 4 of Resolution No. 93-39 is hereby amended to read as follows: Traffic Facilities Fees (TFF) for residential, commercial and industrial development are hereby determined to be:
(1) $4.88 per square foot for residential development and Accessory Dwelling Units 750 square feet or greater; and
(2) $4,122 per thousand square feet for commercial development; and (3) $4,705 per thousand square feet for industrial development.
Section 3. Section 5 of Resolution No. 93-39 is hereby amended to read as follows: Drainage Facilities Fees (DFF) for residential, commercial and industrial development are hereby determined to be:
Section 4.
(1) $1.88 per square foot for residential development and Accessory Dwelling Units 750 square feet or greater; and
(2) $18,078 per acre for commercial development; and
(3) $18,078 per acre for industrial development.
Section 7 of Resolution No. 93-39 is hereby amended to read as follows: Public Facilities Fees (PFF) for residential, commercial and industrial development are hereby determined to be:
Section 5.
(1) $1.45 per square foot for residential development and Accessory Dwelling Units 750 square feet or greater; and
(2) $1,184 per thousand square feet for commercial development; and (3) $888 per thousand square feet for industrial development.
Section 7 of Resolution No. 93-39 is hereby amended to read as follows: Fire Facilities Fees (FFF) for residential, commercial and industrial development are hereby determined to be:
(1) $0.63 per square foot for residential development and Accessory Dwelling Units 750 square feet or greater; and
(2) $517 per thousand square feet for commercial development; and (3) $388 per thousand square feet for industrial development.
Section 6. Section 8 of Resolution No. 93-39 is hereby amended to read as follows: the Park Facilities Fee (PKF) for residential development that is not subject to the provisions of Ordinance No. 33 is hereby determined to be:
(1) $1.67 per square foot for residential development and Accessory Dwelling Units 750 square feet or greater.
Section 7. Any additions constructed after the adoption of this resolution shall be subject to the fees listed above.
Section 8. The fees specified in this resolution shall be used solely for those facilities and improvements necessitated by new development or otherwise as required or authorized by law, and shall become effective sixty (60) days after the effective date of the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 9th day of June, 2025.
Jon Thorp, Mayor
A 1-1EST:
Ana V. Sauseda, MMC
Director of General Services/City Clerk
ATTACHMENT 2
FEE SUMMARY
Land Use
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Public Facilities
Residential (per Sq. Ft.)
Non -Residential (Per 1,000 Sq. Ft.)
$1.22
$992
$744
Fire
Residential (per Sq. Ft.)
Non -Residential (Per 1,000 Sq. Ft.)
$0.63
$517
$388
Parks
Residential (per Sq. Ft.)
Non -Residential (NA)
$1.67
Traffic
Residential (per Sq. Ft.)
Non -Residential (Per 1,000 Sq. Ft.)
$4.88
$4,122
$4,705
Drainage
Residential (per Sq. Ft.)
Non -Residential (per Acre)
$1.88
$18,078
$18,078
INPUT TABLES
General Plan Assumptions
Residential
Rural Living
Single Residential
Multiple Residential
High Density
Plan Development
SOI
Non -Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Institutional
Plan Development
Rounding Adjustment
Total
Housing Units Non -Res Sq. Ft. Adjustments
2,910
14,965
8,146
1,689
2,604
-2
30,312
8,000,000
1,100,000
500,000
0 0
-2,300,000
2,500,000
0 0
0 9,600,000
NA
Non -Res Sq. Ft.
5,700,000
3,600,000
500,000
0 0
9,800,000
Development Input Table
Input current Residential Units
Input Persons per Residential Unit [1]
Input current Commercial Square Footage
Input Commercial Employees per 1,000 SF
Input current Industrial Square Footage
Input Industrial Employees per 1,000 SF
[h]
[a]
[b]
[c]
[d]
[e]
[f]
[g]
Current Buildout
20,247 30,312 [i]
2.76 <= This lines up with the current population and housing units. 2,014,054
2.000
610,886.0
1.500
6,200,000 [e]+[g]
<= This lines up with the current employee count in the City for Commercial 3,400,000 [f]
<= This lines up with the current employee count in the City for Industrial [1] Source: Dept. of Finance. "Table 2: E-5 City/County Population and Housing Estimates, 1/1/2022" Average Square Feet Input Table
Single Family Residential ([a]+[b])
Multi Family Residential ([c]+[d])
Average Square Feet Input Table
Single Family Residential
Multi Family Residential
Unit Assumptions
17,875
9,835
27,710
Avg. Sq. Ft.
2,765
1,319
NA
Product Mix
64.5%
35.5%
100.0%
Weighted Avg.
1,784
468
Projected Land Use A
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Units per Acre / FAR
2.58 0.48
0.28 Total
2,252
<= Determines the remaining residential acreage based on the projected residential units. <= Determines the remaining commercial acreage based on the projected commercial sq. ft. <= Determines the remaining industrial acreage based on the projected industrial sq. ft.
Existing Land Use
Pop / Emp
Units
Sq. Ft.
Persons per
Acres Unit / Emp per
1,000 Sq. Ft.
Residential
55,890
20,247
7,842.89
2.76 Commercial
4,028
2,014,054
97.19 2.00
Industrial
916
610,886
49.28 1.50
Total
NA
20,247
2,624,940
NA
Pre -Existing Land Use
Pop / Emp
Units
Sq. Ft.
Persons per
Acres Unit / Emp per
1,000 Sq. Ft.
Residential
32,987
11,950
4,628.96
2.76 Commercial
0 0
2.00 Industrial
0 0
1.50 Baseline Existing Land Use
Pop / Emp
Units
Sq. Ft.
Persons per
Acres Unit / Emp per
1,000 Sq. Ft.
Residential
22,903
8,386
3,214
2.76 Commercial
4,028
2,284,028
97 2.00
Industrial
916
994,634
49 1.50
Projected Land Use A
Pop / Emp
Units
Sq. Ft.
Persons per
Acres Unit / Emp per
Sq. Ft.
Residential
17,700
9,976
3,864.31
2.76 Commercial
12,400
3,915,972
188.97
2.00 Industrial
5,100
2,405,366
194.04
1.50 Total
NA
9,976 6,321,338
NA
Land Use at Build out
Pop / Emp
Units
Sq. Ft.
Acres
Persons per
Unit / Emp per
Sq. Ft.
Residential
50,687
18,362
2.76 Commercial
12,400
6,200,000
2.00 Industrial
5,100
3,400,000
1.50 Total
NA
Residential Sq. Ft. Assumptions
Quantities
Future Housing Units
9,976
Ave Sq. Ft. Residential
2,252
Total Sq. Ft
22,463,727
18,362
9,600,000
NA
Persons Served
Res. per Unit / EDUs per Unit /
Persons served per
1,000 non -Res.
Persons served Fotal EDUs
per 1,000 non -
Res.
55,890
2.76 1.00
20,247
2,014
1.00 0.36
730
458
0.75 0.27
166
58,362
NA
NA
21,143
Persons Served
Res. per Unit / EDUs per Unit /
Persons served per
1,000 non -Res.
Persons served rota' EDUs
per 1,000 non -
Res.
32,987
2.76 1.00
11,950
1.00 0.36
0 0.75
0.27 0
32,987
NA
NA
11,950
Persons Served
Res. per Unit / EDUs per Unit /
Persons served per
1,000 non -Res.
Persons served Fotal EDUs
per 1,000 non -
Res.
22,903
2.76 1.00
8,386
2,014
1.00 0.36
827
458
0.75 0.27
270
Persons Served
Res. per Unit / EDUs per Unit /
Persons served per
1,000 non -Res.
Persons served Fotal EDUs
per 1,000 non -
Res.
27,784
2.76 1.00
9,976
4,186
1.00 0.36 1,419
2,092
0.75 0.27 654
34,061
NA
NA 12,048
Persons Served
Res. per Unit / EDUs per Unit /
Persons served per
1,000 non -Res.
Persons served Fotal EDUs
per 1,000 non -
Res.
50,687
2.76 1.00
18,362
6,200
1.00 0.36
2,246
2,550
0.75 0.27
924
59,437
NA
NA
21,532
DIF Fee Example
Anticipated
Average
Residential Sq.
Ft.
2,252
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Comparison
DIF Program
Drainage
Traffic
Public Facilities
Fire
Park
Totals
% +/-
Net change
Drainage
$4,244.04
$18,077.90
$18,077.90
Existing RES
3574.74
10098.95
2143.88
1264.57
3094.72
20285.65
Anticipated Sq.
Ft. per Acre (Non -
Residential)
16,504
Traffic
$10,994.90
$68,037.82
$77,651.86
Proposed RES
(per d.u.)
4,244.04
10,994.90
2,738.26
$1,426.76
3,763.86
23,167.82
14.21%
$2,882.18
Public Facilities
$2,738.26
$16,371.67
$12,278.75
$ 669.30
$ 895.95
$ 594.38
$ 162.19
$ 669.14
$ 2,882.18
Fire Park
$1,426.76 $3,763.86
$8,530.44
$6,397.83
Exising COM
15226.94
61853.17
12686.59
7483.24
N/A
97893.68
Proposed COM
18,077.90
68,037.82
16,371.67
$8,530.44
N/A
111,017.82
13.41%
$ 13,124.14
Total
$23,167.82
$111,017.82
$114,406.34
$
2,850.96
6,184.65
3,685.08
1,047.20
13,124.14
Existing IND
15226.94
70593.29
9514.94
5612.43
N/A
101430.41
Proposed
IND
18,077.90
77,651.86
12,278.75
$6,397.83
N/A
114,406.34
12.79%
$ 12,975.92
$ 2,850.96
$ 7,058.56
$ 2,763.81
$ 785.40
$ 12,975.92
Summary of Existing Facilities - Public Facilities
Summary
Total Cost
Unit Basis Unit Total Cost per Unit
Building (Sq. Ft.)
Land (Acres)
Vehicles (Number)
Equipment
$43,333,587
$4,775,528
$201,900
$224,500
Sq. Ft.
Acres
Number
Integrated Units
84,200
15 13
1 $515
$325,087
$15,531
$224,500
Total
$48,535,515 NA NA NA
[1] Existing inventory in Public Facilities Buildings in square feet and the current price per square foot [2] Price determined by existing inventory of undeveloped land (preferably with sales per acre price for the last 5-years [3] Existing inventory of Equipment of vehicles and their costs used in Public Facilities [4] Existing inventory of Equipment used Public Facilities Offsetting Revenue (Grants/General Fund Contributions) -$4,664,695
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC FACILITIES FACILITIES INVENTORY
<= Grant funding tied to deferral.
Buildings
Address
(Sq. Ft.)
Cost / Sq. Ft.
Value [1]
Civic Center
34272 Yucaipa Blvd
25,000
$9,336,688
Maintenance Yard
35111 Oak Glen Road
13,000
$2,583,429
Swimming Pool
$0
Police Station
34144 Yucaipa Blvd.
22,000
$11,865,812
Library Center
12040 5th St
8,000
$2,875,000
Performing Arts Center
12062 California St.
16,200
$16,672,658
Total 84,200 $515 $43,333,587
[1] Source: City data
Land
Address
(Acres)
Cost / Acre i1]
Value
Civic Center
34272 Yucaipa Blvd
4.7 $325,087
$1,527,909
Maintenance Yard
35111 Oak Glen Road
3.23 $325,087
$1,050,031
Swimming Pool
0 $325,087
$0
Police Station
34144 Yucaipa Blvd.
2.24 $325,087
$728,195
Library Center
12040 5th St
1.6 $325,087
$520,139
Performing Arts Center
12062 California St.
2.92 $325,087
$949,254
Total 14.69 4,775,528
[1] Land value of $325, 087 per acre updated per CoStar undeveloped land inventory of 31 properties for 2024.
Equipment & Property
Quantity
Value
Street Sweeper
1 $4,500
Loader
1 $55,000
Backhoe
1 $25,000
Skid Steer
1 $8,500
Skip Loader
1 $8,000
Sikid Steer Breaker
1 $3,500
IT Equipment - Computers
100
$100,000
IT Equipment - Phones
100
$20,000
Total 1 $224,500
[1] Source: City data
Vehicles
Ford Explorer - Code
Units
1 Year
2018
Cost per Unit
$17,500
Total Costs
$17,500
Chevy Colorado - PW
1 2016
$14,400
$14,400
Chevy Colorado - PW
1 2018
$17,000
$17,000
Ford F 150 - Street
1 2016
$17,000
$17,000
Ford F250 - Street
1 2014
$16,000
$16,000
Ford F550 Flatbed - Street
1 2001
$8,000
$8,000
Ford F750 Bucket - Street
1 2000
$5,500
$5,500
Ford F450 Flatbed - Street
1 1999
$4,500
$4,500
Chevy 1500 - PW
1 2017
$21,000
$21,000
Chevy 1500 - PW
1 2017
$21,000
$21,000
Chevy Colorado - Code
1 2020
$19,000
$19,000
Chevy Colorado - Code
1 2020
$19,000
$19,000
Chevy Colorado - Code
1 2021
$22,000
$22,000
Total 13 NA NA $201,900
[1] Source: City data
[II
[2]
[3]
[4]
CITY OF YUCAIPA , CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE CALCULATION
I. Inventory of Existing Public Facilities
Facility
Facility Units
Quantity
Buildings
Land
Vehicles
Equipment
Square Feet
Acres
Vehicle
Integrated Unit
84,200
14.7 13.0
1.0 II. Existing Public Facilities EDU Calculation
Land Use Type
Number of
Persons Served
Number of Units/
Non -Res 1,000 SF
Residents per Unit/
Persons Served per
EDUs per Unit/
1,000 Non -Res. SF per 1,000 Non -Res SF
Total
Number of
EDUs
Residential
Subtotal Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Subtotal Non-residential
55,890
55,890
2,014
458
2,472
20,247
20,247
2,014,054
610,886
2,624,940
2.76 1.00
0.75 NA
1.00 0.36
0.27 NA
20,247
20,247
730
166
896
Total
58,362
21,143
III. Existing Facility Standard
Facility Type
Facility Units
Quantity
Facility Units per
1,000 Persons Served
Buildings
Land
Vehicles
Equipment
Square Feet
Acres
Vehicle
Integrated Unit
84,200
14.7 13
1 1,442.71
0.252
0.223
0.017
IV. Future Public Facilities EDU Calculation
Land Use Type
Number of
Persons Served
Number of Units/
Non -Res 1,000 SF
Residents per Unit/
Persons Served per
EDUs per Unit/
1,000 Non -Res. SF per 1,000 Non -Res SF
Total
Number of
EDUs
Residential
Subtotal Residential
Commercial
Industrial
27,784
27,784
4,186
2,092
9,976
9,976
3,915,972
2,405,366
2.76 1.00
0.75 1.00
0.36 0.27
9,976
9,976
1,419
654
Subtotal Non -Residential
6,278
6,321,338
NA
NA
2,072
Total
34,061
NA
NA
12,048
V. Future Facility Standard
Facility Type
Facility Units
Facility Units per 1,000 Persons Served
Facilities Units Funded
by New Development
Buildings
Land
Vehicles
Equipment
Square Feet
Acres
Vehicle
Integrated Unit
1,443
0.252
0.223
0.017
49,141
8.573
7.59 0.584
VI. Public Facilities Summary Cost Data
Facility Type
Facility Units Funded
Facility Units by Future Development
Cost Per Unit
Total Facility Cost for
Future Development
Cost per EDU
Buildings
Land
Vehicles
Equipment
Square Feet
Acres
Vehicle
Integrated Unit
49,141
8.573
7.587
0.584
$515
$325,087
$15,531
$224,500
$25,290,292
$2,787,087
$117,833
$131,022
$2,099.10
$231.33
$9.78
$10.87
Total
$28,326,234
$2,351
New Development
Adj. for PFF Grants
Total Cost Allocated to New Development
Net Cost uer EDU
28,326,234
4,664,695
32,990,929
$2,738
Land Use
Residential Fee per Sq. Non -Residential Fee per
Ft. 1,000 Sq. Ft.
Units / Sq. Ft
Costs Financed by DIF
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
$1.22
$991.97
$743.98
9,976
3,915,972
2,405,366
$27,316,853
$3,884,535
$1,789,542
Total
$32,990,929
Land Use
Non -Residential Fee / 1,000
Residential Fee / Unit Sq. Ft.
Units / Sq. Ft
Costs Financed by DIF
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
$2,738
$992
$744
9,976
3,915,972
2,405,366
$27,316,853
$3,884,535
$1,789,542
Total
$32,990,929
Trip Rate Input Table
Average Daily Trips Notes
One (1) EDU
9.44 Vehicle Type
Passenger Vehicles
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
Total
Adjustment Factor:
Residential
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100%
Commercial
97.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
100%
Industrial
65.0%
5.0%
5.0%
25.0%
100%
Cost Index Adjustment
2.30%
Transportation Facilities Costs
Offsetting Revenues (Grants/Non-DIF funds)
Offsetting Revenues
CITY OF YUCAIPA
TRAFFIC FACILITIES NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2042
$341,352,341
-$96,076,645
-$1,831,164
<= Only Grants/Outside Funding should be applied here.
<= Only unspent fund should be applied here.
PCE
1.00 1.50
2.00 3.00
NA
Facility Name
Base Cost for Facility
Inflation Adjusted Cost
Policy Background or Objective
Notes / Comments
5th Street - Oak Glen Road to Peach Tree Drive
$3,386,462
$3,464,351
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
5th Street - Peach Tree Drive to Yucaipa Boulevard
$597,252
$610,988
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
5th Street - Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E
$2,082,788
$2,130,692
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
5th Street - Avenue E to Wildwood Canyon Road
$3,138,430
$3,210,613
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
5th Street - Wildwood Canyon Road to Avenue H
$1,713,837
$1,753,255
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
5th Street - Avenue H to County Line Road
$1,706,130
$1,745,371
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
14th Street - Campus Way to Oak Glen Road
$8,671,874
$8,871,327
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Crafton Hills College Village Road - Yucaipa Boulevard to Sanyon Canyon Road $747,447
$764,638
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Crafton Hills College Village Road - Yucaipa Boulevard to Sanyon Canyon Road $236,181
$241,614
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 14th Street to 13th Street
$1,331,382
$1,362,004
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 13th Street to 12th Street
$852,958
$872,576
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 12th Street to Oak Glen Road
$3,069,537
$3,140,136
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - Oak Glen Road to 8th Street
$6,783,392
$6,939,410
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 8th Street to 7th Street
$3,604,989
$3,687,904
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 7th Street to 6th Street
$2,145,546
$2,194,893
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 6th Street to 5th Street
$1,388,084
$1,420,010
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 5th Street to 4th Street
$1,728,967
$1,768,733
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 4th Street to 2nd Street
$2,202,627
$2,253,287
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - 2nd Street to California Street
$776,366
$794,222
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - California Street to Bryant Street
$723,315
$739,952
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Avenue E - Roundabout at 3rd and 2nd
$3,182,290
$3,255,483
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - North City Limits to Topaz Street
$575,114
$588,342
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Topaz Street to Carter Street
$3,313,920
$3,798,7?J
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
New traffic signal programmed @Grape Ave
Bryant Street - Carter Steet to Bryant Street
$506,587
$518,238
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Bryant Court to Oak Glen Road
$586,352
$599,838
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Oak Glen Road to Date Street
$1,003,261
$1,026,336
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Date Street to Yucaipa Boulevard
$312,301
$319,484
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E
$2,833,683
$2,898,858
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Avenue E to Sunlight Drive
$2,502,862
$2,560,428
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Sunlight Drive to Wildwood Canyon Road
$724,597
$741,263
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Wildwood Canyon Road to Avenue H
$4,893,598
$5,006,150
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Bryant Street - Avenue H to County Line Road
$853,670
$873,305
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
California Street - Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue D
$887,041
$907,443
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
California Street - Avenue D to Avenue E
$179,992
$184,132
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
California Street - Avenue E to Wildwood Canyon Road
$2,425,608
$2,481,396
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
California Street - Wildwood Canyon Road to Avenue H
$0
$0
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
California Street - Avenue H to County Line Road
$1,356,922
$1,388,131
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Calimesa Boulevard - Oak Glen road to County Line Road
$5,153,564
$5,272,096
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Road - I-10 WB Ramps to Calimesa Boulevard
$691,842
$707,755
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Road - Calimesa Boulevard to 5th Street
$704,988
$721,203
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Road - 5th Street to 4th Street
$871,608
$891,655
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Road - 4th Street to 3rd Street
$281,683
$288,161
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Road - 3rd Street to California Street
$1,325,538
$1,356,025
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Road - California Street to Bryant Street
$492,839
$504,174
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Road - Casa Blanca Avenue to Bryant Street
$1,843,919
$1,886,329
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Road - Bryant Street to 2nd Street
$3,741,392
$3,827,444
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Road - 2nd Street to Yucaipa Boulevard
$9,445,790
$9,663,043
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Road - Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue D
$1,345,758
$1,376,711
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Road - Avenue D to Avenue E
$1,191,810
$1,219,221
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Road - Avenue E to Colorado Street
$4,882,291
$4,994,583
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Road - Colorado Street to Outer Highway 10
$23,543,798
$24,085,306
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - Outer Highway 10 So to Calimesa Boulevard $114,068,712
$116,692,292
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - Calimesa Boulevard East of 9th Street $1,576,428
$1,612,686
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - East of 9th Street to Colorado Street $1,824,902
$1,866,875
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - 5th Street to Colorado Street
$2,423,372
$2,479,109
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - 3rd Street to 5th Street
$2,077,043
$2,124,815
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - California Street to 3rd Street
$2,067,650
$2,115,206
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - Bryant Street to California Street $1,550,428
$1,586,088
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Canyon Road - Mesa Grande Drive to Bryant Street $4,129,424
$4,224,400
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - Freeway Entrance to Avenue E
$2,711,082
$2,773,437
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - Avenue E to 17th Street
$14,983,610
$15,328,233
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 17th Street to 16th Street
$3,112,680
$3,184,272
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 16th Street to 15th Street
$4,787,959
$4,898,082
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 15th Street to 12th Street
$10,104,640
$10,337,046
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 12th Street to loth Street
$5,906,622
$6,042,474
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - l0th Street to Oak Glen Road
$2,332,468
$2,386,114
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - Oak Glen Road to 7th Street
$3,440,760
$3,519,897
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 7th Street to 5th Street
$4,776,408
$4,886,266
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 5th Street to 4th Street
$884,607
$904,953
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 4th Street to 3rd Street
$919,070
$940,209
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 3rd Street to 2nd Street
$898,086
$918,742
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Boulevard - 2nd Street to Bryant Street
$304,571
$311,576
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Hills Parkway
$7,887,553
$20,312,335
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Updated bridge costs - Note: 2 bridges are required if FCSP update is NOT approved + ROW cost in Pumpkin Patch
Transportation Facilities Subtotal $ 321,310,256 $ 341,352,341
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
TRAFFIC FEE CALCULATION
I. Future Traffic Facilities EDU Calculation
Land Use Type
Number of
Persons Served
Residents per Unit/
Number of Units/ Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Total Non -Res 1,000 SF 1,000 Non -Res. SF per 1,000 Non -Res SF Number of EDUs Residential
Subtotal Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Subtotal Non-residential
27,784
27,784
4,186
2,092
6,278
9,976
9,976
3,915,972
2,405,366
6,321,338
2.76 1.00
0.75 NA
1.00 0.36
0.27 NA
9,976
9,976
1,419
654
2,072
Total
34,061
12,048
II. Buildout Traffic Facilities EDU Calculation
Land Use Type
Number of
Persons Served
Residents per Unit/
Number of Units/ Persons Served per EDUs per Unit/ Total Non -Res 1,000 SF 1,000 Non -Res. SF per 1,000 Non -Res SF Number of EDUs Residential
Subtotal Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Subtotal Non -Residential
50,687
50,687
6,200
2,550
8,750
18,362
18,362
6,200,000
3,400,000
9,600,000
2.76 1.00
0.75 NA
1.00 0.36
0.27 NA
18,362
18,362
2,246
924
3,170
Total
59,437
NA
NA
21,532
Ill. Future EBU Calculation
Land Use Type
Trip Generation Rate
per EDU
Total EDUs
Adjustment
Factor (PCE)
Total
Daily Trips
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
9.44 9.44
9.44 9,976
1,419
654
1.0000
1.0350
1.5750
94,173
13,860
9,717
Total
117,751
IV. Buildout EBU Calculation
Land Use Type
Trip Generation Rate
per EDU
Total EDUs
Adjustment
Factor (PCE)
Total
Daily Trips
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
9.44 9.44
9.44 18,362
2,246
924
1.0000
1.0350
1.5750
173,337
21,945
13,735
Total
209,017
V. Proposed Facilities Cost
Facility
Facility
Cost
Transportation Facilities Cost
Offsetting Revenue (Grants/General Fund
Contributions)
Offsetting Revenue
$341,352,341
($96,076,645)
($1,831,164)
Total Facilities Cost
$243,444,532
VI. Allocation of Facilities to All Development
Facility
Buildout
Daily Trips
Facility Cost
Allocated to
New Development
Facilities
Cost Per
Daily Trip
Transportation Facilities Cost
Total Facilities Cost per Daily Trip
209,017
209,017
$243,444,532
$1,165
$1,165
VII. Transportation Impact Fees and Cost Financed by Fees per Unit/per 1,000 Non -Res. S.F.
Land Use Type
Total Trips (EBUs)
Cost Financed
by Impact Fees
New Development
(Units / Sq. Ft.)
Impact Fees
(per Unit/
per 1,000 Sq. Ft.)
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
94,173
13,860
9,717
$109,685,116
$16,143,451
$11,317,212
9,976
3,915,972
2,405,366
$10,995
$4,122
$4,705
Initial Allocation to New Develo • ment
117,751
137,145,778
NA
NA
VIII. Transportation Impact Fees and Cost Financed by Fees per Unit/per 1,000 Non -Res. S.F.
Land Use
Residential Fee / Sq. Ft.
Non -Residential Fee /
1,000 Sq. Ft.
Units / Sq. Ft
Costs Financed by DIF
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
$4.8827656774501100000
$4,122.46
$4,704.99
9,976
3,915,972
2,405,366
$109,685,116
$16,143,451
$11,317,212
Total
$137,145,778
Summary of Existing Facilities - Park Facilities
Summary Total Cost
Unit Basis
Total Units
Cost per Unit
Land
$151,737,608
Acres
466.76
$325,087
Property / Structure / Equipment
$28,194,012
Acres
466.76
$60,404
Vehicles
$78,000
Acres
466.76
$167
Total
$180,009,620
NA
NA
$385,658
Summary
Per Acre
Land Aquisition
$325,087
Park Development
$60,571
Total
$385,658
[4]
[5J
[1J Undeveloped land vaue & the number of total park acres that the City owns [2J Total property, structures and equipment for the City parks [3] Number of vehicles and their respective prices
[4J Price determined by existing inventory of undeveloped land (preferably with sales per acre price for the last 5-years [5] Total property, structures and equipment and vehicles for the City parks / number of acres Park Standard
General Plan Standard
Current Standard
Acres per 1,000 Residents
3.50 8.35
Standard Utilized For Study (Minimum)
3.50 Offsetting Revenue (Grants/General Fund Contributions) -$377,545
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
PARKS FACILTIES LIST
Land Inventory
Address
(Acres) Cost / Acre
Value
John Tooker Civic Park
Seventh Street Park
Crafton Hills Aquatics Center (Not a City Facility)
13th Street Sports Complex _
Crafton Hills Park
Yucaipa Regional Park (Not a City Facility)
Yucaipa Community Park
Yucaipa Community Center
Bryant Glen Complex
El Dorado Ranch Park
Flag Hill Veterans Memorial Park
Wildwood Canyon (Not a City Facility) _
Wildwood Park
Avenue I Park
Yucaipa Equestrian Center
Avenue A Park
Center Park
Scherer Senior Center
Lilian Eaton Park
4-
34272 Yucaipa Blvd, Yucaipa, CA 92399
12385 7th St, Yucaipa, CA 92399
'11711 Sand Canyon Rd, Yucaipa, CA 92399
11928 Yucaipa Blvd Yucaipa CA 92399
33570 Brandon Rd, Yucaipa, CA 92399
33900 Oak Glen Road, Yucaipa, CA 92399
34900 Oak Glen Rd, Yucaipa, CA 92399
'34900 Oak Glen Road
11092 Sunnyside Dr, Yucaipa, CA 92399
37186-, 37254 Oak Glen Rd, Yucaipa, CA 92399
'12080 Fremont Yucaipa Ca 92399
12241 Canyon Drive Yucaipa Ca 92399
- - - -
36699 Wildwood Canyon Rd, Yucaipa, CA 92399
34130 Ave I Yucaipa Ca 92399
13273 Calfornia St Yucaipa Ca 92399
'Ave A Yucaipa Ca 92399
35015 Avenue B Yucaipa Ca 92399
12202 1st Street Yucaipa Ca 92399
'34282 Yucaipa Blvd, Yucaipa, CA 92399
0.5 13.5
29.8 $325,087
$325,087
$162,544
$4,388,675
$325,087 $9,687,593
2.49 $325,087 $809,467
31.1 1.2
13.3 334
7.8 12.9
10.3 7.2
0.5 1
0.67 0.5
$325,087
$325,087
$325,087
$325,087
$325,087
$325,087
$325,087
$325,087
$325,087
$325,087
$325,087
$325,087
$10,110,206
$390,104
$4,323,657
$108,579,058
$2,535,679
$4,193,622
$3,348,396
$2,340,626
$162,544
$325,087
$217,808
$162,544
Total
466.76
$151,737,608
*** Ignore the Parks that ar not city Facilities
Vehicles
Model
Year
Cost
Chevy
Ford
Chevy
Ford
Chevy
Colorado
F150
Colorado
Exploer
Colorado
2016
2015
2018
2014
2018
12,700
16,300
19,000
10,000
$20,000
Total
5.0 $78,000
Property / Structures / Equipment
Total
Playground Equipment
Landscaping/Irrigation
Additional Parking
Security Lighting
Restrooms
Sidewalks/Trails
Picnic Areas
Playfield Lighting
Building Expansion
Drainage Improvements
Signage
Uptown Park
Dunlap Park
5-Winds Park _
Oak Glen Park
Oak Glen Creek Park
Crafton Hills Tennis Complex
4-
$340,086
$1,026,636
$542,650
$146,662
$879,972
$586,650
$586,650
$733,310
$439,986
$366,657
$26,399
$2,692,559
$7,493,980
_ $8,000,000
$1,021,500
$1,137,920
$2,172,393
Total
$28,194,012
[1J
[2J
[3J
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
PARKS FACILITIES FEE CALCULATION
I. Current Facilities Standards
Acres per 1,000 Residents
Proposed Residential
Facility Standard ( Acres
per Resident)
Persons per
Household
(Detached Dwellings
residents per Unit)
3.50 0.0035
2.76 II. Number of Acres Needed to Meet Facility Standards Land Use Type
Park Acres Required per
Unit
Number of Units Total Number of Park
Acres Required
Residential
0.00966
9,976
96.38 Total
NA
9,976
96.38 III. Projected Facility Costs Necessary to Meet Facility Standards Acres
Cost Per Acre Facility Costs
Park Improvements
96.38 $385,658 $37,170,755
Total
$37,170,755
IV. Cost Allocation
Allocation to New Development
Total Allocated to New Development
Adj. for PFF Grants
Net Allocated to New Development
Cost Per Unit
100%
$37,170,755
$377,545
$37,548,300
$3,764
Land Use Type
Fee / Unit
Units
Costs Financed by
DIF
Residential
$3,764
9,976
$37,548,300
Total
$37,548,300
Land Use
Fee / Sq. Ft.
Units
Costs Financed by
DIF
Residential
$1.671507999449550
9,976
$37,548,300
Total
$37,548,300
Summary of Existing Facilities - Fire Facilities
Summary
Total Cost Unit Basis
Units
Cost per Unit
Building (Sq. Ft.)
Land (Acres)
Vehicles (Number)
Equipment
$19,900,000
$1,683,951
$7,320,000
$550,000
Sq. Ft.
Acres
Number
Integrated Units
19,900
5 17
1 $1,000
$325,087
$430,588
$550,000
Total
$29,453,951 NA NA NA
[1] Existing inventory in Public Facilities Buildings in square feet and the current price per square foot [2] Price determined by existing inventory of undeveloped land (preferably with sales per acre price for the last 5-years [3] Existing inventory of Equipment of vehicles and their costs used in Public Facilities [4] Existing inventory of Equipment used Public Facilities Offsetting Revenue (Grants/General Fund Contributions) $1,838,246
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
FIRE FACILITIES INVENTORY
Buildings
Address
(Sq. Ft.) Unit Cost / Sq. Ft. [1] Value
Bryant Street Fire Station
11416 Bryant Street
7,300
$1,000
$7,300,000
Crafton Hills Fire Station
35664 Yucaipa Blvd
5,300
$1,000
$5,300,000
Wildwood Fire Station
[259 Wildwood Canyon Ro,
7,300
$1,000
$7,300,000
Oakglen
Unstaffed
$0
19,900
$19,900,000
[1] Source: City data
Land
Address
(Acres)
Unit Cost / Acre [11
Value
Bryant Street Fire Station
11416 Bryant Street
2.51 $325,087
$815,968
Crafton Hills Fire Station
35664 Yucaipa Blvd
0.75 $325,087
$243,815
Wildwood Fire Station
34259 Wildwood Canyon
Road
1.92 $325,087
$624,167
Oakglen
Unstaffed
-
Total
5.18 $1,683,951
[1] Land value of $325,087 per acre updated per CoStar undeveloped land inventory of 31 properties for 2024.
Vehicles
Type of Vehicle Make
Units [1]
Cost
Paramedic Engine 551
1 $750,000
$750,000
Reserve Engine 551A
1 $350,000
$350,000
CAL FIRE Engines 3551
1 $75,000
$75,000
CAL FIRE Engines 3569
1 Paramedic Engine 552
1 $750,000
$750,000
Brush Engine 552
1 $350,000
$350,000
Reserve Engine 552A
1 Paramedic Engine 553
1 $750,000
$750,000
Reserve Engine 553A
1 $350,000
$350,000
Medic Engine 553
1 $50,000
$50,000
Battalion Engine 3513
1 $120,000
$120,000
Brush Engine 555
1 $450,000
$450,000
Brush Patrol 555
1 $350,000
$350,000
Water Tender 555
1 $300,000
$300,000
Future - Ladder
1 $2,300,000
$2,300,000
Future - Medic/Paramedic
1 $275,000
$275,000
Future - Medic/Paramedic reserve
1 $100,000
$100,000
[1J
[2]
[3]
[4]
Total
17 7,320,000
$7,320,000
[1] Source: City data
Equipment & Property
Station Equipment
Quanity
Cost per Unit
Cost [11
$250,000
Notes
Station Upgrades
$300,000
Drive/concrete upgrade
Total
1 $550,000
[1] Source: City data
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
FIRE FACILITIES FEE CALCULATION
I. Inventory of Fire Facilities
Facility
Facility Units
Quantity
Buildings
Land
Vehicles
Equipment
Square Feet
Acres
Vehicle
Integrated Unit
19,900
5.2 17.0
1.0 II. Existing Fire Facilities EDU Calculation
Land Use Type
Number of
Persons Served
Number of Units/
Non -Res 1,000 SF
' esi a ents per Unit
Persons Served per
1,000 Non -Res. SF
EDUs per Unit/ Total
per 1,000 Non -Res SF Number of EDUs
Residential
Subtotal Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Subtotal Non -Residential
55,890 20,247 2.76 1.00 20,247
55,890 20,247 NA NA 20,247
2,014
458
2,472
2,014,054
610,886
2,624,940
1.00 0.36 730
0.75 0.27 166
896
Total
58,362
NA
NA 21,143
III. Existing Facility Standard
Facility Type [3]
Facility Units
Facility Units per
Quantity 1,000 Persons Served
Buildings
Land
Vehicles
Equipment
Square Feet
Acres
Vehicle
Integrated Unit
19,900
5.18 17
1 341
0.089
0.291
0.017
IV. Future Fire Facilities EDU Calculation
Land Use Type
Number of
Persons Served
Number of Units/
Non -Res 1,000 SF
' esi ents per Unit
Persons Served per
1,000 Non -Res. SF
EDUs per Unit/ Total
per 1,000 Non -Res SF Number of EDUs
Residential
Subtotal Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Subtotal Non -Residential
27,784
27,784
4,186
2,092
6,278
9,976
9,976
3,915,972
2,405,366
6,321,338
2.76 1.00 9,976
NA NA 9,976
1.00 0.36 1,419
0.75 0.27 654
NA NA 2,072
Total
34,061
NA
NA 12,048
V. Future Facility Standard
Facility Type
Facility Units
Facilities Units Funded
Facility Units per 1,000 Persons Served by New Development Buildings
Land
Vehicles
Equipment
Square Feet
Acres
Vehicle
Integrated Unit
341
0.089
0.291
0.017
11,614
3.023
9.922
0.584
VI. General Fire Summary Cost Data
Facility Type
Facility Units Funded
Facility Units by Future Development
Cost Per Unit
Total Facility Cost for
Future Development Cost per EDU
Buildings
Land
Vehicles
Equipment
Square Feet
Acres
Vehicle
Integrated Unit
11,614 $1,000 $11,614,012 $964
3.023 $325,087 $982,785 $82
9.922 $430,588 $4,272,089 $355
0.584 $550,000 $320,990 $27
Total
$17,189,876 $1,427
New Development
Adj. for PFF Grants
Total Cost Allocated to New Development
Net Cost uer EDU
17,189,876
1,838,246
19,028,122
$1,579
Land Use
Residential Fee / Non -Residential Fee / 1,000
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Units / Sq. Ft
Costs Financed by DIF
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
$0.63
$516.87
$387.65
9,976
3,915,972
2,405,366
$14,233,407
$2,024,031
$932,438
Total
$17,189,876
Land Use
Residential Fee / Non -Residential Fee / 1,000
Unit Sq. Ft.
Units / Sq. Ft
Costs Financed by DIF
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
$1,427
$516.87
$387.65
9,976
3,915,972
2,405,366
$14,233,407
$2,024,031
$932,438
Total
$17,189,876
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
Storm Drainage Imput
Land Use Units per Acre / FAR
Runoff
Coefficients
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
2.58 0.48
0.28 0.5000
0.8250
0.8250
Cost Index Adjustment
•
2.30%
Facilities Costs
Offsetting Revenues (DIF Cash on Hand / Deferrals)
Offsetting Revenues (DIF Expenditures)
Offsetting Revenue (Grants/General Fund Contributions)
CITY OF YUCAIPA
PUBLIC FACILITIES NEEDS LIST THROUGH 2042
$324,033,109
$0
- $67,978,178
- $42,249,114
<= In this case, we are looking at new development's share of the entire system, we need to include DIF funds received. <= In this case, we are looking at new development's share of the entire system, we need to include DIF funds received.
Facility Name
Base Cost for Facility Inflation Adjusted
Cost
Policy Background or Objective
Notes / Comments
Chicken Springs Wash Station 0+000000 to 20+95
$4,898,131
$5,010,788
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Chicken Springs Wash Station 20+95 to 31+20
$2,400,359
$2,455,568
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Chicken Springs Wash Station 31+20 to 51+70
$4,484,477
$4,587,620
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Chicken Springs Wash Station 51+70 to 65+60
$3,532,848
$3,614,104
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Chicken Springs Wash Station 65+60 to 78+90
$3,485,797
$3,565,970
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Chicken Springs Wash Station 78+90 to 91+95
$2,529,745
$2,587,929
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Chicken Springs Wash Station 91+95 to 106+31
$2,746,975
$2,810,155
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Chicken Springs Wash Station 106+31 to 124+94
$3,280,448
$3,355,898
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Drain Station 0+00 to 31+62 (72" RCP & 84" RCP) $4,254,888
$4,352,750
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
County Line Drain Station 0+00 to 4+86 (84" RCP)
$524,579
$536,644
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 0+00 to 15+50
$2,086,706
$2,134,700
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 15+50 to 21+00
$222,924
$228,052
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 21+00 to 34+65
$916,114
$937,184
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 34+65 to 47+90
$638,006
$652,680
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 47+90 to 55+10
$505,241
$516,861
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 10+00 to 13+03.18 (36" RCP)
$248,699
$254,420
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 10+00 to 42+19.70 (Ave E West 54", 60" $ 66" RCP) $3,570,137
$3,652,250
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel Station 10+00 to 14+21.68 (Ave E East 36" RCP) $345,906
$353,862
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel 10+00 to 37+38.27 (Kentucky St West 60" RCP) $2,976,320
$3,044,775
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Dunlap Channel 10+00 to 13+94.46 (Kentucky St East 36" RCP) $254,668
$260,526
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Oak Glen Station 0+00 to 60+00
$17,011,638
$17,402,906
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 0+00 to 62+70
$17,128,974
$17,522,940
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 62+70 to 97+05
$8,869,862
$9,073,869
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 97+05 to 120+22
$7,402,860
$7,573,126
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek 120+22 to 147+22
$8,388,450
$8,581,385
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 147+22 to 169+76
$5,991,852
$6,129,664
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwod Creek Station 0+00 to 46+14
$9,699,869
$9,922,966
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 46+14 to 62+10.
$6,145,043
$6,286,379
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 62+10 to 85+10
$6,353,500
$6,499,631
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 85+10 to 107+12
$13,256,446
$13,561,344
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 107+12 to 137+49
$7,075,662
$7,238,402
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 137+49 to 150+21
$3,949,847
$4,040,694
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 150+21 to 172+63
$4,595,315
$4,701,007
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 172+63 to 207+93
$7,099,050
$7,262,328
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wildwood Creek Station 0+00 to 03+50 (48' RCP)
$168,278
$172,148
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 0+00 to 48+01
$19,278,704
$19,722,115
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 48+01 to 66+78
$5,718,783
$5,850,315
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 66+78 to 90+25
$5,405,137
$5,529,455
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
wilson Creek Station 90+25 to 131+92
$13,437,663
$13,746,729
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 131+92 to 174+26
$23,454,645
$23,994,102
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 174+26 to 199+53
$11,564,662
$11,830,650
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 199+53 to 222+58
$8,315,364
$8,506,617
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 222+58 to 247+72
$10,350,268
$10,588,324
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 247+72 to 268+77
$3,935,773
$4,026,296
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 268+77 to 286+69
$16,322,922
$16,698,349
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 286+69 to 304+51
$3,589,362
$3,671,917
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 0+00 to 3+65 (84" RCP)
$349,890
$357,938
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 3+65 to 21+61 (72" RCP)
$1,500,835
$1,535,355
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 0+00 to 9+93 (48" RCP)
$560,799
$573,697
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Wilson Creek Station 0+00 to 1+50 (RCP Fremont Crossing) $910,660
$931,606
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Creek Station 0+00 to 64+30
$9,550,543
$9,770,205
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Creek Station 64+30 to 78+89
$2,644,641
$2,705,468
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Yucaipa Creek Station 78+89 to 108+74
$2,092,037
$2,140,153
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
MAP Projects 41, 57, 58, 91
$4,972,229
$5,089,283
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Gateway Wash 0+0 to 02+50
$5,883,011
Capital Improvement Plan - Engineering Division
Added requirement
Offsetting Revenues
Storm Drainage Subtotal $ 310,994,531 $ 324,033,108.73
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
STORM DRAIN FEE CALCULATION
I. Existing EBU Calculation
Units / Sq. Ft.
Units per Acre / FAR Developed Acreage
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
20,247
2,014,054
610,886
2.582
0.476
0.285
7,843
97.2 49.3
Total
7,989
[1] Based on Acreage information provided by City.
II. Run off Rate Coefficient Calculation (Existing)
Land Use Category
Runoff Rate
Coefficient "C" [1]
Developed Acreage
Current
Total Unit Runoff
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
0.50 0.83
0.83 7,843
97 49.3
3,921
80 40.7
Total
7,989
4,042
[1] Source: Caltrans Highway Design Manual (pg. 28). Residential - Midpoint of Single Family areas. Commercial - midpoint of Downtown Areas. Industrial - midpoint of light and heavy areas.
III. Future EBU Calculation
Land Use Category
Units /Sq ft.
Units per Acre / FAR
Developed Acreage
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
9,976
3,915,972
2,405,366
2.582
0.476
0.285
3,864
189.0
194.0
Total
4,247
IV. Run off Rate Coefficient Calculation (Future)
Land Use Category
Runoff Rate
Coefficient "C"
Developed Acreage
Future
Total Unit Runoff
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
0.50 0.83
0.83 3,864
189
194.0
1,932
156
160.1
Total
4,247
2,248
V. All Facilities
Facility
New Development
Facility Costs
Storm Drain Facilities City $
Offsetting Revenue (DIF
Expenditures/Cash on Hand) $
Total $
324,033,108.73
(67,978,178.00)
256,054,930.73
VII. Allocation of Facilities to Existing and New Development (based on Total Runoff) Land Use Category
Allocation by
Total Unit Runoff (EBUs)
Percentage New Development Costs
Existing Development
New Development
4,042
2,248
64.26%
35.74%
$164,543,199
$91,511,731
Total
6,290
100.00%
$256,054,931
V. Proposed Facilities
Facility
New Development
Facility Costs
Storm Drain Facilities City $
Offsetting Revenues (Grants) $
Total $
91,511,731
(42,249,114)
49,262,617
Overall
Cost Per Unit Runoff
$21,913
VI. Storm Drainage Impact Fees and Cost Financed by Fees per Acre Land Use Category
Runoff Rate
Coefficient "C"
Cost Per Unit Runoff
Allocation Rate
per Acre
Cost Financed
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
0.50 0.83
0.83 $10,956
$18,078
$18,078
$128,267,540
$5,173,236
$4,398,776
Total
$137,839,552
Land Use Category
Per Sq. Ft. / Per Acre
Number of Units/
Developed Acreage New Development
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
$1.88
$18,077.90
$18,077.90
9,976
189.0
194.0
$42,338,516
$3,416,216
$3,507,885
Total
$49,262,617
Fee per Unit
Number of Units/
New Development
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
$4,244
$18,078
$18,078
9,976.0
189.0
194.0
$42,338,516
$3,416,216
$3,507,885
Total
$49,262,617