Yucaipa City Council
August 25, 2025

08/24/2O24 City COUIWii Agenda
$o 1

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor -Quality -Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation's Technical E.xhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application ofBiosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High - Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS--6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

0$/24/2024 City Coil Agenda
890

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Maga=ine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses OfBiogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.
activity and odor.

Presentations:

Prepared for and
Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States" Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII.- Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

08/20/2024 City C®ulldl Apnna
896

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium -Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23' Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23" Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 - 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants - DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey's C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey's Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

08/20/2024 City C UI1Q11 AgaRla
592

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February. 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical 1.lse, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M.A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Bio/est. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recove,y Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

08/20/2024 City C®II1161 AgaRla
898

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Bjosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California. - •• - •
Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico.

May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April I, 2002.

Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment. Goal:

To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on voe emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

O8/24/2O24 City Colln@il Agenda
894

James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round -up. 1996.

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. I 993
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Billy Wildrick, Plaintiff vs. BNSF Railway Company
Case No. CIVDS1711810
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-17-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County, State of Georgia
Richard Hutcherson, Plaintiff vs Norfolk Southern Railway Company Case No. 10-SCCV-092007
Rosenfeld Deposition I0-6-2022
In the Civil District Court of the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana Millard Clark, Plaintiff vs. Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al.

Case No. 2020-03891
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-15-2022
In The Circuit Court of Livingston County, State of Missouri, Circuit Civil Division Shirley Ralls, Plaintiff vs. Canadian Pacific Railway and Soo Line Railroad Case No. 18-LV-CC0020
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-7-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jonny C. Daniels, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. 20-CA-5502
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-1-2022
In The Circuit Court of St. Louis County, State of Missouri Kieth Luke et. al. Plaintiff vs. Monsanto Company et. al.

Case No. 19SL-CC0319 1
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-25-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jeffery S. Lamotte, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. NO. 20-CA-0049
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-22-2022
In State of Minnesota District Court, County of St. Louis Sixth Judicial District Greg Bean, Plaintiff vs. Soo Line Railroad Company
Case No. 69-DU-CV-21-760
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-17-2022
In United States District Court Western District of Washington at Tacoma, Washington John D. Fitzgerald Plaintiff vs. BNSF
Case No. 3:21-cv-05288-RJB
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-11-2022
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

08/26/2023 City Cowae17 And
9g6

In Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Macon Illinois Rocky Bennyhoff Plaintiffvs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-L-56
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-3-2022
In Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County Ohio
Joe Briggins Plaintiff vs. CSX
Case No. A2004464
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-17-2022
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern George LaFazia vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. BCV-19-103087
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-17-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Bobby Earles vs. Penn Central et. al.

Case No. 2020-L-000550
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-16-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of Florida Albert Hartman Plaintiff vs. Illinois Central
Case No. 2:20-cv-1633
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-4-2022
In the Circuit Court of the 4'h Judicial Circuit, in and For Duval County, Florida Barbara Steele vs. CSX Transportation
Case No.16-219-Ca-008796
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of New York Romano et al. vs. Northrup Grumman Corporation
Case No. 16-cv-5760
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-10-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Linda Benjamin vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 007599
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Donald Smith vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 003426
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-24-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Jan Holeman vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 000675
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-18-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County State of Georgia
Dwayne B. Garrett vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-SCCV-091232
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-10-2021
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

O/Z SiikitCtin11A t
8U'

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Ruepke vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 007730
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-5-2021
In the United States District Court For the District of Nebraska Steven Gillett vs. BNSF
Case No. 4:20-cv-03120
Rosenfeld Deposition I0-28-2021
In the Montana Thirteenth District Court of Yellowstone County James Eadus vs. Soo Line Railroad and BNSF
Case No. DV 19-1056
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-21-2021
In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al.cvs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc.

Case No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-14-2021
Trial October 8-4-2021
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a

AMTRAK,
Case No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-28-2021
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail Case No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al. vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case No. CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-7-2021
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case No. 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No. 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-30-2019
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

08/26/2024 CiV etym i Agenda

In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No. 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-7-2019
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division Mfr Carla Maersk vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS "Conti Perdido" Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles - Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles - Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition I0-6-2018; Trial3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiffs vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No. I :I6-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-20I 8 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, I 12th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No. 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition 1I-17-20I7
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintifs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No. CJ2-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-23-2017
In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case No. 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-22-2020
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warm Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No. LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 4: I6-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2017
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

08/26/2024 City Coutwit And
9�9

In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No. RG1471 1 I 15
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No. LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action No. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition June 2015
In The Iowa District Court for Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No. 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case No. CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case No. cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV IO 0987)
Rosenfeld Deposition October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 20I0, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition September 20I0
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case No. 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2009
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

08/25/2024 City Council And

O8/2 /2O24 City Council Ali
800

From: Amy Brown
To: Public Comment
Subject: Save live oak canyon
Date: Monday, September 23, 2024 12:42:55 PM
To whom it may concern
My name is Amy Brown and I am writing in opposition of the warehouse and residential development in the Live Oak Canyon area.

I have lived in this area for most of my 63 years. I have seen a lot of changes - some good and some not so good. This proposed warehouse and residential development will be terrible for the area.

Traffic is already congested. I own a business that is on Outer Hwy 10. Everyday at 3PM the traffic in that area on the 10 freeway is backed up. Adding more homes and more businesses that rely on trucks will add exponentially to that traffic issue. As it is, people get off the freeway hoping to circumvent the traffic and end up on outer hwy 10 (causing a line of traffic on this street - where my business is) and/or trying to take side streets through neighborhoods causing traffic in residential areas. I cannot imagine what it would look like if these two projects are approved.

Most importantly is the loss of wildlife and open spaces. We cannot continue to encroach on areas reserved for local flora, fauna and our wild animal friends. They are so important to a healthy ecosystem and long term for our environment. It would be a crime to take away that open and natural land and put up homes and warehouses. Include with that Light pollution, pollution from more cars and trucks, litter and noise from construction and trucks. Ugh! I am adamantly against this project and encourage the Yucaipa City council to vote against this as well.

Amy Brown
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
881

From: Sherli Leonard
To: Public Comment; Kim J Metzler, CMC, CPM
Subject: City Council agenda item 21
Date: Monday, September 23, 2024 12:49:59 PM
Attachments: Yucaipa Letter 2.docx
Attached is a letter from Redlands Conservancy, a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization which holds a conservation easement on the 341-acre Herngt 'Aki' Preserve directly across the road from the proposed warehouse project, Pacific Oaks Commerce Center. This letter is in opposition to the proposed project.

Sherli Leonard, executive director, Redlands Conservancy [email protected],
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
882

REDLANDS

CONSERVANCY
At Historic Asistencia, 26930 Barton Road, PO Box 855, Redlands, CA 92373; redlandsconservancy.org; 909 782-6208 To: Honorable Mayor and Councilpersons and Staff of Yucaipa From: Redlands Conservancy, Sherli Leonard, executive director; 909 782-6208; [email protected]
26930 Barton Road, Redlands CA 92373
Re: Agenda Item 21 for September 23, 2024: Proposed warehouse project for Live Oak Canyon and Proposed update to the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan
Date: September 20, 2024
Redlands Conservancy, a 501(c)(3) non-profit land trust and historic preservation organization based in Redlands, strongly opposes the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center, the warehouse development proposed for open space in Live Oak Canyon.

We are aware that project proponents maintain the structures will not be visible from Yucaipa; however, they will be completely visible from all places west and north, including the 341-acre Herngt 'Aki' Preserve in the hills on the north side of Yucaipa Creek; the Preserve is owned by City of Redlands and is managed through a conservation easement held by Redlands Conservancy. The Preserve includes nine miles of multi -use natural surface trails which are well -used by hikers, cyclists, birders, and equestrians from Redlands, Yucaipa and all over Southern California. Viewing two 20-acre- plus warehouse structures will seriously diminish the outdoor experience of all the Preserve's users.

Many more problems exist. You are aware of them: impossible traffic jams at I-10/Live Oak Canyon Road interchange; significantly increased unhealthful air pollution from diesel exhaust; likely procedural problems with handling the Specific Plan Update, the SEIR and the project's CUP all at the same time; the project's noise and GHG emissions that cannot be mitigated.

Furthermore, the project is planned for an open space area that has outstanding examples of native habitat, the sort that is currently being demolished all over the Yucaipa/Calimesa area. Central to that problem is the documented existence of and use by endangered Southern California mountain lions. In 2023, mountain lions and their caches were observed within .6 mile of the proposed development, on the southeast side of Live Oak Canyon Road. Mountain lions have been videoed in the residential areas along Alta Vista Drive in Redlands, and most recently (September 2024), a mountain lion youth was photographed on the slopes of Herngt 'Aki' Preserve, within .5 mile of the proposed project; if there is a mountain lion youth here, so is there the mother. Major construction equipment and mountain lion habitat do not mix.

Redlands Conservancy has actively advocated protection of the area's wildlife corridor; one such corridor runs through Herngt 'Aki' Preserve. It is naive to think that the seriously increased heavy traffic this project will bring will have no impact on the endangered mountain lions and other wildlife in this region.

The proposed project covers at least 334 acres of natural open, permeable land, which currently absorbs run-off water from rain events. With at least 100 acres to be covered by the project's hardscape, that run-off water will now flow — where? Live Oak Canyon Road? Properties to the west? Yucaipa Creek? Where will the dirty water from diesel fuel, oil, and construction materials go? Any place other than on -site will be intolerable, and illegal. 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
883

Vast acres of undeveloped open space still exist between the inland area's densely developed areas and the deserts to the east, along the 1-10 and 60 corridors. The land is largely flat, and very inviting to distribution center developers who are in a position to borrow money and offer indecent (hence, irresistible) prices to long-time land owners. Resulting developments bring on heavy big rig traffic and commensurate diesel -exhaust pollution, unsightly monolithic concrete structures, and the loss of any there -there —the region becomes just another ugly place.

Professional business journals predict that the warehouse "movement" in this region will significantly taper off in the near future, and those warehouses that are currently in the queue for approvals, or are in the construction process, or are ready for a user, will have a diminished chance of becoming occupied. As an example, a two -million square foot warehouse development on Cherry Valley Blvd was finished and ready for the 1,000 truck deliveries and pick-ups each day in January 2023 — 20 months ago, yet remains unoccupied with no apparent opening date. Perhaps that situation results from the buildings not being fully permitted and approved for occupancy, or from a failure to find a user — we're not in a position to say.

Redlands Conservancy encourages you to work with our organization and other groups in the region — not just Yucaipa, because the proposed project affects all of us — to determine a remarkable and creative way to use this opportunity to make this area an even better place to live, work, and play.

We urge you to consider the irreplaceable value of the unique landscapes that Yucaipa enjoys, and to protect them — no other community in the southern California area can claim these benefits. They make this town and region special; warehouses do nothing positive for the area, not even jobs. That Cherry Valley Blvd development? Where are the hundreds of jobs that were promised? By the time that place is opened, if it is opened, it will be fully -automated.

The prospect of any more empty warehouses, logistics centers, and/or distribution centers is disheartening and repulsive.

Thank you for your attention.

Sherli Leonard, Executive Director
Redlands Conservancy
PO Box 855
Redlands CA 92373
909 782-6208
[email protected]
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
884

From: Sage Porter
To: Public Comment
Subject: Regarding Warehouses
Date: Monday, September 23, 2024 12:55:26 PM
Hello, I was told I can comment here regarding the warehouses.

This would be a horrendous thing to do. It's hard to understand how Yucaipa and Calimesa both want to sell out to these huge and hideous buildings that would suffocate our land and give us terrible air quality. No matter how much you fix the freeway it will be full of semi -truck traffic coming and going to all these warehouses going through Yucaipa and Calimesa.

We moved in this area because we were being surrounded by warehouses, and you don't know how bad it is till you live in it. This will bring morale way down. In our experience from warehouse development in our former city, the quality of life will diminish because of the increase in semi -truck traffic, the decline in air quality, and the change in scenery from rural to industrial. All will affect residents' well-being. Not to mention how bad it will be for our seniors and children, people with health conditions and the wild life that surrounds us.

Our area is special because we don't have these major industrial buildings and this is why we want to live here. There are plenty of other ways to make the city money. We don't have to be a truck stop, we can do better.

Thank you for your time.

S. Gregory
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
885

From: Christina Thompson
To: Kim J Metzler, CMC, CPM
Cc: Public Comment
Subject: Opposition to Freeway Corridor Specific Plan update and the Pacific Oaks Commerce Cente Date: Monday, September 23, 2024 1:10:27 PM
Dear Council Members,
As a lifelong resident of Live Oak Canyon, I am opposed to the proposed Freeway Corridor Specific Plan update and the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center. These projects would increase traffic and result in more accidents, destroy property, cause environmental pollution, and destroy the rural nature of the community.

Live Oak Canyon Road is a two-lane road connecting the 1-10 to the 1-60 which exists in both San Bernardino and Riverside County. With the projected additional one thousand truck trips per day, this higher traffic will increase the risk of accidents to both local residents and the many Yucaipa citizens.

Besides motor vehicle accidents from reckless driving, the increase of traffic during rush hours causing true bumper to bumper congestion will be highly dangerous for residents along Live Oak Canyon Road needing emergency medical services due to delays.

Paving and grading over 5 million square feet of impermeable services to put in large warehouses will disrupt the natural watershed leading to increased water runoff which will cause erosion, flooding, landslides, and a drop in the water table - all which pose a great threat to the environment and adjacent properties.

Building more warehouses as a source of revenue for the city and to "create jobs" is a short-sighted solution. The Inland Empire warehouse industry is currently declining and it is inevitable that these warehouses will increasingly turn to Al and automation of tasks to replace workers. Welcoming more of this industry into our community means these low paying and low skill jobs will become an unemployment liability in the near future.

The claim that this proposal will protect the rural small-town community atmosphere is false. The development will be easily visible from the nearby Herngt Aki preserve and Gateway Ranch hiking trails. Not only are these trails highly valued for recreational use, this land is also an important part of habitat supporting biodiversity including multiple species and the endangered Southern California Mountain Lion. This project takes away yet even more pristine habitat, irreversibly impacting the lives of both humans and animals, all for the sake of large buildings supporting American consumerism.

Looking to the future, is this what Yucaipa wants? To pollute and destroy its biodiversity for both humans and animals instead of championing and respecting these land resources? 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
886

This land needs to be conserved rather than developed. I urge the council to reject the warehouse proposal, as it does not reflect the best interest of our community.

Sincerely,
Christina Thompson
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
887

Cherise M. Jesse
Redlands, CA 92373
September 21, 2024
City of Yucaipa
34272 Yucaipa Blvd.

Yucaipa, CA 92399
Dear City of Yucaipa Planning Commission,
I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the proposed Pacific Oaks Commerce Center Project, which would bring a massive 2,054,000-square-foot warehouse logistics center east of Live Oak Canyon Road and south of 1-10. This project presents serious risks to our community, and I urge the city to reconsider its approval.

Traffic and Road Safety
The current proposal includes access through Live Oak Canyon Road, a narrow, winding two-lane road that is simply not equipped to handle the volume of trucks and cars this project would bring. Increased truck traffic would severely degrade road conditions, cause significant traffic congestion, and heighten the risk of accidents on this dangerous stretch of road. Live Oak Canyon Road was never intended to bear the burden of a large-scale industrial facility, and residents who use this road daily will suffer.

I encourage each of you to take a drive every weekend from now until November 1st. Start on Interstate 10, pass the pumpkin patch, and continue down Live Oak Canyon Road for a few miles. As you drive, consider the proposed project and the daily traffic it will generate.

Environmental and Wildlife Impact
Live Oak Canyon is home to a variety of important wildlife species, including bobcats, coyotes, mountain lions, and migratory birds. This area serves as a critical wildlife corridor that allows animals to move between habitats, and it contributes to the ecological health of the region. The size and scope of this project would disrupt these natural habitats, putting wildlife at risk and forever altering the delicate balance of our local ecosystem.

Runoff and Water Quality Concerns
The development of such a massive industrial center will inevitably result in increased runoff, which will exacerbate downstream erosion issues that are already present in the 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
888

nearby riverbed. Uncontrolled runoff will not only worsen flooding concerns for communities downstream but could also lead to contamination of local water sources.

This is particularly alarming given the area's natural topography and how sensitive it is to erosion.

Air and Noise Pollution
With over 1,058 truck stalls planned and nearly 1,000 car spaces, the air quality in Yucaipa will be drastically impacted by this project. Continuous truck activity will lead to an increase in air pollutants, while the constant flow of trucks will contribute to significant noise pollution, harming the quality of life for those living near Live Oak Canyon and surrounding areas.

Conflict with the Yucaipa Freeway Corridor Specific Plan The initial study for the Yucaipa Freeway Corridor Specific Plan, conducted in August 2006, clearly outlined a set of Guiding Principles, one of which was to "maintain the impression of the City of Yucaipa as a quality rural community." This project contradicts that very principle. The proposed industrial development would disrupt the rural character of Live Oak Canyon and surrounding areas, replacing natural landscapes with large-scale warehouses and continuous truck traffic. This is not in line with the city's long-term vision and the promises made to preserve Yucaipa's unique rural appeal for future generations.

Conclusion
This project will drastically alter the character of Live Oak Canyon —a place valued by residents for its natural beauty, wildlife, and peacefulness. It will increase traffic, erode road safety, impact local wildlife, and jeopardize water quality. For these reasons, I urge the City of Yucaipa to reconsider this development and seek alternatives that respect the environmental integrity of Live Oak Canyon and the safety and quality of life for its residents.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Cherise M. Jesse
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
889

From: tanya petrovna
To: Public Comment
Cc: Kim J Metzler, CMC, CPM
Subject: Warehouse proposal
Date: Monday, September 23, 2024 1:57:09 PM
Vote No! This is just too much without any consideration for any kind of wildlife or a nature corridor, just solid concrete. Wiping out the native flora and landscape affecting pollinators and species. These warehouses are a nightmare environmentally and many of us do believe that nature is important for our health. Nature helps us not just being directly in it, being near it provides so many benefits.

I've never been able to drive the 60 since that massive destruction of what used to be the best drive ever going from Palm Springs out of town. So stressful to see it.

If you are going to approve something to be built, whatever it is, please keep the native environment in mind and see that it is considered in the blueprints.

Thank you.

Tanya Petrovna
Chef and Founder
www.cheftanyaskitchen.com
@cheftanyaskitchen
Life is short, do it (t)all!
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
890

From: Luz Quinnell
To: Public Comment
Subject: Public Comment for Item 21. FREEWAY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE Date: Monday, September 23, 2024 2:18:31 PM
Hello City Councilmen,
I urge the City Council to vote against Item 21 and approve a Motion against the FCSP Update. Approving and building a warehouse with so many vacant warehouses nearby is incredibly irresponsible and does not serve the people of Yucaipa. We need a new library; we need paved roadways, and many more services, and wasting money to approve a warehouse is wasteful. Additionally, traffic and air impacts have not been thoroughly analyzed in the CEQA document.

Thank you for considering my comment,
Luz Quinnell
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
891

From: kathybehrens
To: Public Comment
Cc: Kim J Metzler, CMC, CPM
Subject: Warehouse and plan updates
Date: Monday, September 23, 2024 2:32:41 PM
To the YucaipaCity Council,
This warehouse project is the wrong use of this land. Traffic, air quality, views, wildlife corridors, recreation and your residents' quality of life will all be negatively impacted by this huge development.

Your original freeway corridor specific plan set this canyon aside as open space. Do not bend to the pressure of this developer to amend your plan to allow this project.

Another opportunity to engage in an appropriate use and potential development will come along. Please wait for it.

Thank you.

Kathy Behrens
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
892

From:

To: Public Comment; PAMELA SMYTH
Subject: Agenda Item No. 16/24-044/GPA/SPA
Date: Sunday, April 13, 2025 10:48:28 PM
Honorable Mayor Jon Thorp and City Council Members:

In the best interest of the City of Yucaipa's future, the concerns consistently voiced by residents, and those of neighboring cities, I encourage you to rescind the FCSP Update SEIR Certificate as recommended.

Yours sincerely,
Pamela L. Smyth
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
893

From: Amanda Frye
To: Public Comment
Subject: Agenda Item No. 16/24-044/GPA/SPA
Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 8:34:11 AM
Dear Honorable Mayor Jon Thorp and City Council Members:

The pastoral countryside and agricultural landscapes along Outer Highway 10 and Live Oak Canyon are a treasure and should be maintained for Yucaipa's future. What a grand entry into the City of Yucaipa.

Don't destroy Yucaipa's assets! No one visits a city for cookie cutter developments, warehouses or industrial development, but they will visit to see agricultural and nature! It is in Yucaipa's best interest amd future to rescind the FCSP and update the SEIR Certificate.

Sincerely,
Amanda Frye
(A Yucaipa business patron and neighbor)
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
894

From: David Matuszak
To: Kim J Metzler
Cc: Public Comment
Subject: Warehouse SEIR vote
Date: Monday, April 14, 2025 10:31:17 AM
Attachments: facebook logos PNG19751.png
Yucaipa City Council:

On behalf of the residents of Live Oak Canyon, I urge you to continue your pathway towards preventing warehouses from ever being built in Live Oak Canyon by voting to rescind the warehouse project's SEIR.

Respectfully,
David .Matuszak, president
Friends of Live Oak Canyon
iri https://www.facebook.com/groups/203152950549301
Friends of
Live Oak
Canyon
Dedicated prose+++ng the nearer anwer nmeni of the canyon 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
895

From: Public Comment
To: Benjamin Matlock
Subject: FW: Please Don't Industrialize Yucaipa
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 2:08:01 PM
Attachments: COYSECONDARY3 7916fdb3-bec5-493a-b982-1609ace2deba.pnq City of Yucaipa
• • , CA
Office:
www.yucaipa.gov
From: Chloe Andres
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 1:54 PM
To: Bob Miller ; Chris Venable ; Judy Woolsey
; Justin Beaver ; Jon Thorp
Cc: Public Comment
Subject: Please Don't Industrialize Yucaipa
Dear City Council Member,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (FCSP) and the proposed Pacific Oaks Commerce Center. These projects pose serious risks to the health, environment, and overall character of our community.

Yucaipa has always been known for its small-town charm, clean air, and close-knit community. The industrialization proposed under the FCSP, particularly with projects like the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center, threatens to destroy the very qualities that make our city special. Increased traffic, air pollution, noise, and environmental degradation are just a few of the many concerns residents have voiced —and for good reason.

Beyond the environmental and health concerns, these developments do not align with the 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
896

values and vision that many of us hold for Yucaipa. Turning our city into a hub for large-scale warehousing and industrial commerce will irreparably damage the hometown feeling that attracts families and fosters local pride.

I urge you to stand with the residents of Yucaipa and oppose the FCSP and Pacific Oaks Commerce Center. Let's work together to protect the health of our community and preserve the unique character of our city.

Sincerely,
Chloe Andres
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
897

From: Public Comment
To: Beniamin Matlock
Subject: FW: Rescind support I-10 Corrider
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 2:07:56 PM
Attachments: COYSECONDARY3 7916fdb3-bec5-493a-b982-1609ace2deba.pnq City of Yucaipa
••,CA
Office:
www.yucaipa.gov
From: Susan bangasser
Subject: Rescind support 1-10 Corrider
I advocate for the repeal of the 1-10 Corridor Freeway Specific Plans SEIR. The extensive residential development, warehouses, and industrial parks threaten to undermine the natural beauty of the area, which is valued as a nature preserve. Furthermore, the increased traffic and pollution resulting from this expansion will exacerbate our already strained environmental capacity.

Susan Bangasser
Local resident
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
898

Benjamin Matlock
From: Amie Chapman
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2024 10:17 PM
To: Benjamin Matlock
Subject: 1-10 Corridor Development Case No 21-196 - Awaiting your reply Hello Mr. Matlock,
I am very concerned about the development that is being discussed for the warehouses, housing tract planning and the amount of traffic, congestion and other issues that this plan would bring to our area.

Here are my concerns:
• Amount of cars on the road
• Weight on our Schools
• Weight on our local parks and recreation
• Road quality
• Stress on our local stores
• Pollution
• Zoning for our area
• Loss of beauty
• Loss of rural "feel"
How is the council planning on voting for this? Has there been any pushback from the local residents? I see the houses on the West side of Oak Glen Road are boarded up and have been told there will be a gas station there? Why are we pushing for development in this area? I believe this will change our area forever!!! We moved here to get away from the developments, this will make our serene area a busy, compact area that will forever be changed!!!!
Please tell me that you are in the government to make sure the residents are being taken seriously about our needs and wants for our area.

Are there any other steps I can take that would help support the Council saying "NO" to the developers? Thank you!!
Amie Chapman
8th and Colorado
1 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
899

From: Bob Miller
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2025 12:19 PM
To: Joanie. James
Subject: Re: Responded to your request
Joanie,
Thank you for your well thought out analysis from your experience in government. I appreciate your honesty.

I will take your thoughts and comments under consideration.

Take care,
Bob
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Joanie. James
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2025 12:02:07 PM
To: Bob Miller
Subject: Responded to your request
Good morning Mr. Miller -
I just finished looking at all 5 options proposed to council for consideration.

I found option 5 interesting. It's presented like a stake to the heart threat to council as well as citizens. Shameful actually. I can only speak for myself about how I feel about more warehouses. We don't need them in our city or our sphere of influence —period.

Having stated that, I can support well -designed housing, limited well -designed business parks and enhanced public spaces such as parks, ball fields and horse trails and off road bike trails. A good example of a well designed business park is at the Ford Street exit— south. It was a very politically charged topic especially for south Redlands. Today, the business park is home to nice looking buildings, easy in and out with sufficient parking for a number of medical related practices. La Volta restaurant has managed to survive there for 7 years, even during the pandemic. That business park has survived without a car wash, without a 7-11, 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
900

without a fast food establishment. It was designed to blend into the housing especially the houses along Sunset.

When I moved here in 1992 the rolling hills housing tract had been a political hot topic. A few years later, Chapman Heights became the political hot topic. People still lament about the loss of the dying orange groves. However, not a single group formed to buy that property from the owner nor did a group volunteer to pool their funds to pay the property taxes or pay to maintain the groves.

Now the next housing hot topic is the North Bench housing and possible winery development developments. Any new housing project presented by any developer will face some harsh criticism, as it should. Outside developers come to small towns because they believe small town elected officials are easily swayed to side with developers. This too will be your challenge.

If the areas proposed for warehouses were changed to housing and business parks, the council could place higher standards on such development. Parks added, walking trails added, an area set aside for a future school —elementary or middle school. Well designed streets to allow ease of entry and exits to all spaces. Well designed apartments or townhomes would meet state requirements. Possibly exempt them from any bond fees to meet that frequently used term "affordable housing". A future developer may be required to develop using a Mello -Roos bond. They are not popular but they are effective. Chapman Heights homes sell quickly.

Bonded developments in Beaumont doing well. Bonded developments in areas of the low desert do quite well.

If Kaiser still has plans to build in Yucaipa, perhaps they would consider building on the south side at the Live Oak exit. All they can say is no. But I doubt they will consider it if big rigs back up at Live Oak. They face that now at their Redlands facility.

We all know the State of California is broke. For anyone to think that our area or any surrounding area is going to get substantial support from the state is sadly mistaken. The Inland Empire is not high on their list and never has been. I worked for the County of San Bernardino from 1969-1984. I spent 6 of those years working at the Board of Supervisors. I know from experience how developers bleed cities and sway elected officials into their way of thinking.

The one and only area that stood their ground from the day of incorporation was 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
901

Rancho Cucamonga. Three rural communities agreed to become one city with full intentions to control all development from day one. They have been the most successful. It's not too late for the City of Yucaipa to take more control.

The citizens of this city stepped up and willingly voted to increase the sales tax here to help meet the budget needs of the city. I voted for that tax. My daughter and her husband, who live in Chapman Heights, did the same. She sees her future here in Yucaipa. She works in Redlands. She fights truck traffic on California, Tennessee and Alabama and Mt View. Her husband works in Mira Loma, the smog center of SoCal due to warehouses.

I know you are in a tough position but you stepped up as a leader.

Respectfully,
Joanie James
On Apr 27, 2025, at 8:23 AM, Bob Miller
wrote:

Joanie,
Would you consider reviewing the agenda report that is posted online on this item? There are several options listed in the report. I would like to know what your suggestion(s) would be after looking at the options.

Take care,
Bob
Get Outlook for iOS
Bob Miller
Councilmember
City of Yucaipa
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
902

City Hall • 34272 Yucaipa Blvd • Yucaipa, CA 92399
Office: 909-797-2489 Ext. 501
www.yucaipa.gov
From: Bob Miller
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2025 2:52:22 PM
To: Joanie. James
Subject: Re: Please— no warehouses
Joanie,
Thank you for your email and perspective.

Take care,
Bob
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Joanie. James
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2025 2:47:35 PM
To: Bob Miller
Subject: Please— no warehouses
Councilman Miller. I live in District 1 in Rolling Hills. My husband and I moved here in 1992 from Fontana. We grew up in Fontana but left due to warehouses, Section 8 and low income housing and the growth of criminal gangs from Pomona and LA.

Today, Yucaipa is facing a decision about warehouses being built in our city boundaries and our sphere of influence. I implore you to vote NO on any warehouse development. There are plenty of studies that point out more cons than pros when it comes to warehouses. STOP 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
903

THE DESTRUCTION OF PRISTINE PROPERTIES.

Please read the links below.
https://calmatters.orglcommentary/2023/01 /inland-empire- california-warehouse-development)
sciencedirect.com
0 Respectfully.

Joanie James
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
904

From:

To: Jennifer Crawford; Jon Thorp; Chris Venable; Justin Beaver; Bob Miller; Judy Woolsey; Benjamin Matlock Subject: Request for conclave of regional stakeholders of FCSPU Date: Thursday, May 1, 2025 2:25:53 PM
Attachments: Dear Mr.docx
Dear Mr. Matlock and Honorable Members of the Yucaipa City Council I am writing with regard to the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update which is currently on your agenda for your consideration.

I am asking that you will convene at least one meeting of all the important stakeholders. The meeting would address, traffic infrastructure, green infrastructure, water, flood control, housing requirements and any other regional issues and constraints that are relevant and explore potential alternatives
It would include:

Representatives of San Bernardino County Government and Department of Economic Development
Representatives of Riverside County Government
California Department of Transportation
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
County Flood Control
Water Company suppliers such Yucaipa Valley Water District USGS
The Cities of Redlands and Calimesa
Experts on Mitigation Point Availability and the potential Transfer of Development Rights The Redlands and Two Canyons Conservancies, possibly Crafton and Wildwood Canyon Conservancies
The Rivers and Lands Conservancy which could help with State and Federal Grant opportunities.

All land owners of Live Oak Canyon
A couple of thoughtful community representatives.

The goal is to make clear what is the most important desired outcome and how it is best achieved given the considerations and rights of all concerned . The combined wisdom and expertise and sense of involvement would be beneficial to its success.

Given the love all the region has for the rural nature of Live Oak Canyon and Yucaipa„ there must be a way to benefit commercially from the crowds who are excited to enjoy it, and at the same time benefit the finances and economic development of the City of Yucaipa as a whole in a larger perspective.

And beauty attracts creative and productive people to Yucaipa such as yourselves. Thank you. 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
905

Joanne Lessard
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
906

From: Jennifer Crawford
To: Benjamin Matlock
Subject: FW: Analysis of Freeway Corridor Plans
Date: Monday, April 28, 2025 7:59:51 AM
Attachments: emailsig 4b0758cb-513c-4837-b504-78094ad13b88.pnq emailsig 4b0758cb-513c-4837-b504-78094ad13b88.pnq
image.pnq
image.pnq
Warehouse impacts in Southern California.pdf
Jennifer Crawford
Interim City Manager
City of Yucaipa
City Hall • 34272 Yucaipa Blvd • Yucaipa, CA 92399
Office: 909-797-2489 Ext. 236 Mobile: 909-768-4888
www.yucaipa.gov
From: Jennifer Crawford
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2025 7:57 PM
To: Benjamin Matlock ; Fermin Preciado, P.E.

Subject: Fwd: Analysis of Freeway Corridor Plans
FYI
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:

From: Bob Miller
Date: April 27, 2025 at 1:20:56 PM PDT
To: Jennifer Crawford
Subject: Fw: Analysis of Freeway Corridor Plans
FYI
Get Outlook for iOS
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
907

Bob Miller
Councilmember
City of Yucaipa
City Hall • 34272 Yucaipa Blvd • Yucaipa, CA 92399
Office: 909-797-2489 Ext. 501
www.yucaipa.gov
From: Kevin Miskin
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2025 8:24:21 AM
To: Bob Miller ; Justin Beaver ; Judy
Woolsey ; Jon Thorp ; Chris Venable

Subject: Analysis of Freeway Corridor Plans
Respected Councilmembers,
I reviewed the freeway corridor plans attached to Mondays agenda and recommend Option 1 (2008 approved plan) with a small amendment which is to change the pumpkin patch to Agri -tourism. Having reviewed Option 1 and 2 side by side I note the following:

1. Option 1 (2008 plan) creates the least public controversy and is implemented in the shortest time frame.

2. In comparison to Option 1, Option 2 (Mega Warehouses) a. Decreases regional commercial acreage by 58 percent, which reduces sales tax opportunity and revenue to the city (warehouses are one of poorest sources of sales tax revenue to municipalities). b. Increases warehousing by nearly 770 percent
c. Decreases open space by almost 10 percent
d. Offers no public facilities. Option 1 provides 45 acres of public land. (I believe the City received the Community Center, City Hall, and school land from Chapman Heights and Rolling Hills developments).
e. Decreases residential acres by nearly 47 percent.
f. Decreases jobs by 11 percent. Warehouses are a poor source of good paying wages and warehouse jobs are increasingly lost to automation. g. Increases diesel truck traffic and emissions (diesel emissions account for more than 50 percent of total inhalation cancer cases).

The people of lower Yucaipa (from Yucaipa Blvd to County Line Road) are already unfairly burdened with exposure to diesel exhaust. CalEnviroScreen, a planning tool developed by the State of California for planning (and not used by Yucaipa), gives a score of 82 to lower Yucaipa (as shown on the screenshot below), meaning that the exposure to the people of lower Yucaipa is 82 percent greater than the rest of the census tracts in California. 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
908

I have also attached a peer reviewed paper from the Journal of Transport Geography (October 2022) on the negative impacts of warehouses in Southern California (among other things, this paper cites the poor economic benefit of warehouses to cities while decreasing the quality of life). If you don't have time to digest the paper, I recommend reading the introduction.

There are few, if any, benefits from making any significant change to the original plan.

Again, my recommendation would be to amend the existing plan to provide for agri-tourism at the pumpkin patch while staying true to the original 2008 Freeway Corridor Plan. 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
909

To: City Council for Yucaipa
From: Mike K4cCuistion
Date:8/14/24
Re: Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (FCSP)
My name is Mike McCuistion and I live on Cherry Croft in Yucaipa. Ben Madlock was kind to review the overall FCSP update with me and Chris Palmer is a personal friend who explained his part of the SP to me regarding the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center (POCC) proposal. For the good of our beloved community, I have prepared this document to encourage you to vote in favor of both the FCSP Update and the PO[C.

About Meand mywife L]ndymf54yeans:
*Built first house as owner -builders in Yucaipa in 1976 (we've lived in Yucaipa for some 40 years) *Cindy has a General Contractors license and I'm a High School retired History teacher for 25 years *We have built many homes for ourselves, our family and some friends —including three subdivisions *VVeunderstendtheDeve|opmentsideondthe6tate'sdennandaun|uca|comnounitiesforaffordab|e housing and ADU's
*1 had the privilege of serving on the General Plan committee, Vector Control, Little League and in my local church. I've help start two Christian schools in Yucaipa *We initially moved here from San Bernardino for Yucaipiancultural values, school system, for planting our own fruit trees, our own garden, hones and rural living. *Last year we built our last house on an acre of land 'in the North Bench for much the same reasons — rural living. However, we do have two attached ADU'sthat we rent out to our adult grandchildren *We understand the need in the North Bench to stand up to Sacramento and maintain our rural living and Open Space.

Personally, I have tried to listen with an open mind to both sides of the FCSP proposal. I met Kristine Mohler onacommittee chaired first byher and then byDonna Snodgrass regarding the Wine Country.

I've learned that former city manager Ray Kasey was trying to proactively get ahead of Sacramento on both the WCSP and the FCSP. I've had discussions with Kevin Miskin and Joel McCabe and met twice with Donna (and Ray) Snodgrass. These are all good and well meaning people who love Yucaipa. City Manager Chris Mann was kind to meet with me specifically on the Freeway Corridor. I've also met with 4 of the five city councilmen on both Specific Plan proposals. | think | understand the passionate desire by some to resist development proposals stated in these Specific Plans. I do not condone personal attacks of any kind. That behavior does not represent the vast majority of well mannered Yucaipians.

I think I understand how we got into the city's debt concern as I've met separately with both Greg Franklin and Chris Mann on the matter. The city has always been known to be frugal with expenditures, but now finds a need to increase revenue going forward. As I understand it, the city is considering an alternative proposal for a city-wide sales tax increase on its citizens. Also, the city is considering cutting back an law enforcement protections because of current insufficient city revenues. We all know that projects and businesses that can create revenue and jobs will help our city significantly. The Pacific Oaks Commerce Center is a responsible, significant, rare, and unique opportunity which can add significant revenues and benefits tothe city, year after year.

The Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update appears to be a well -considered and balanced plan developed by the city and its professional consultants to meet important and required state and regional requirements, community needs, and refinements to the existing Freeway Corridor Specific Plan. | believe we as a community should be appreciative of our dedicated city leadership, city staff, and professional consultants. Also, to have confidence in their nearly 3 years of work to balance all the many l
O8/25/2025City Council Agenda
���
�u"v

issues, requirements, and interests to develop this zoning Update in a way to better help our community. In several instances the Update lessens the burdens or impacts on the community, and yet creates a zoning plan that meets current and foreseeable standards and conditions to help facilitate reasonable and balance growth (which can be very beneficial for the wellbeing of the community). I understand that the majority of landowners within the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan area (those most affected) support the Update.

The Pacific Oaks Commerce Center is in the best possible location for Yucaipa to provide the best benefit with the least impacts. Pacific Oaks Commerce Center is a unique; Class A logistics project consisting of two buildings with modem farmhouse building architecture to blend with the surrounding canyon. The POCC proposal is located at the far southern end of the city, south of the freeway, far away from the main parts of town, and nearly hidden from view. Further, the POCC meets or exceeds the new and up-to-date development standards proposed by the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update. The proposal shows 96 acres of that land set aside as permanent open space with multi -purpose public access trail.

From the 1-10 off ramp, the Live Oak Road would be widened from two lanes to four lanes to the project road where a traffic signal is installed. The total infrastructure developmental cost is in excess of $35M on streets, a four mile water line (originating from Ave D), a sewer line and storm drainage improvements to serve the project and improve existing conditions. The developer will use solar power with EV charging and donate $490,000 for Fire Station2 to purchase a much needed new fire ladder truck. This is a good and responsible project that can provide our city with a rare and unique opportunity for significant initial and ongoing city revenue and with both temporary and permanent community jobs.

There are one-time DIF and permit fees and recurring property tax revenues to the City of Yucaipa. No other type of use or place in Yucaipa can achieve as much benefit with the fewest impacts.

I believe the city should take advantage of this rare opportunity.

The Pacific Oaks Commerce Center is on the Palmer family land owned since 1954, which spans three generations of stewardship. The Palmers have tried to be good members of the community and business owners in Yucaipa. Chris Palmer lived in Yucaipa for years and is a friend of mine for over twelve years now. I know him to be a man of integrity. For 30 years, Gregg Palmer created and grew the Christmas Tree Farm and Pumpkin Patch business with passion and love for his customers. David Palmer served for decades on several city and county committees wanting to help protect and improve the community.

Chris Palmer shared his heart with me recently regarding the POCC when he said, "The Palmer family wants to leave a lasting positive heritage in the city of Yucaipa. We have owned this land for 70 years and have put a lot of thought and prayer into having this property in order for it to be a benefit to the community. We have intentionally turned down other big corporate developer bids, and chose Pacific Industrial because of their high integrity, desire and ability to find good, responsible, fair, and workable solutions, and for their long-term commitment to ownership." I support this project and feel it would be a huge benefit to our community. Please vote in favor of the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update and the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center tonight. Thank you for all you do.

Sincerely, Mike McCuistion
L-Z-z
2 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
911

From: Public Comment
To: Benjamin Matlock
Subject: FW: Corridor freeway plans
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 5:45:16 PM
Attachments: COYSECONDARY3 7916fdb3-bec5-493a-b982-1609ace2deba.pnq City of Yucaipa
• • , CA
Office:
www.yucaipa.gov
Original Message
From: Nelly
Subject: Corridor freeway plans
We are residents in this area, right between Yucaipa and Redlands and we want to ask you politely to rescind the plan's for the 1-10 corridor freeway massive residential development and the proposed warehouses behind the Pumpkin Patch as well as the commercial/industrial park. This not only will bring hardship to the residents but for the wildlife in our community. Traffic is absolutely madness as it is. 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
912

AQUA CALiENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS.

TAIB L I{ISTDFi1C FRESE1 VF;TFON
03-044-2022-005
June 21, 2024
[VIA EMAIL TO:[email protected]]
City of Yucaipa
Mr. Benjamin Matlock
34272 Yucaipa Blvd,
Yucaipa, CA 92399
Re: Final SEIR Freeway Corridor Specific Plan
Dear Mr. Benjamin Matlock,
The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) appreciates your efforts to include the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) in the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (FCSP) project. We have reviewed the documents and have the following comments:
*Before ground disturbing activities begin please contact the Tribal Historic Preservation Office at [email protected] to arrange cultural monitoring.
*An informational meeting with the developer, lead agency, and archaeologist regarding cultural compliance procedures for this project.

Again, the Agua Caliente appreciates your interest in our cultural heritage. If you have questions or require additional information, please call me at (760) 883-1137. You may also email me at [email protected].

Cordially,
Luz Salazar
Cultural Resources Analyst
Tribal Historic Preservation Office

AGUA CALIENTE BAND

OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
5401 DINAH SHORE DRIVE, PALM SFRINGS, CA 9226.4
T 764,689+8800 r 760,699161324
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
Y WW.AgUAGALJENT£-NS#M.GOV
913

Benjamin Matlock
From: Tom Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2024 9:47 AM
To: Benjamin Matlock
Subject: New Specific Plan
Ben:

Per our earlier conversation can you provide this e-mail to the Planning Commissioners for the discussion on the new Specific Plan.

Please review and consider reducing the large amount of open space especially adjacent to the commercial components. This is a very well located property compared too many others in the City and can bring great services, businesses, and living areas that other properties in the City would not attract. It would seem prudent to make sure as much as possible is available for use and generating income in the City..

The Open Space Conservation areas should have some flexibility for the property owners. They should not be forced to dedicate land if they can mitigate in another area inside or outside the specific plan. Additionally any land that is set aside should allow the owner to get mitigation credit from any agencies such as California Fish and Wildlife and U.S. Fish and Wildlife. If these agencies will not give mitigation credit then the owners should have the flexibility to take out of conservation area.

Thank You for your diligence on this project it should be a great addition to the City.

Tom Robinson
VantageOne Real Estate Investments, LLC
TREH Partners, LLC
4 Corporate Plaza, Suite 210
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(949) 631-6620 office
(949) 903-3818 mobile
[email protected]
JD
VantageOne
REAL EST .rE INYE57MENT5
vantageoneinvestments. com
When One tugs at a single thing in nature, they find its attached to the rest of the world John Muir
1 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
914

From: N. Abraham Issa
To: Beniamin Matlock
Subject: Re: FCSP Update
Date: Monday, March 31, 2025 2:08:06 PM
Attachments: imaoe001.onq
emailsig 4b0758cb-513c-4837-b504-78094ad13b88.pnq
energovlogo-2.18.2024v2 222e3ad5-dedb-406c-9cdc-cf9f27c23aa0.pnq Good afternoon Mr. Matlock
Thank you for checking with me. Yes we are still OK with the recommended rezoning of the property to Industrial. Please let me know if there is any additional information you need from me.

N. Abraham Issa
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 12:54 PM Benjamin Matlock wrote:

Hi Abraham,
I
I hope all is well. We are working to get the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan back on track and just wanted to check and see if the proposed changes for the site were still okay. Let me know if there is anything — I am happy to discuss. -------------------------------------
Benjamin Matlock
Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner City of Yucaipa
City Hall • 34272 Yucaipa Blvd • Yucaipa, CA 92399
Office: 909-797-2489 Ext. 261
www.yucaipa.gov • Yucaipa Permit Exchange
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
915

YUCAIPA
.1ERMIT EMEwn.eGE
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
916

PALMER GENERAL CORPORATION
April 22, 2025
Re: Palmer support of currently proposed Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update Dear Ben Matlock:

As you know, the Palmer family owns a 326-acre property at the southeasterly quadrant of Live Oak Canyon Road and Interstate 10, a central part of the proposed Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update (FCSPU or Plan). As long-term owners of the land, we support the currently proposed FCSPU and encourage the City to move forward with approval and adoption of the Plan.

We have been involved in the community for decades through our businesses, participation in city and county committees, residences, and various community organizations. We care deeply about Yucaipa and believe the FCSPU is a positive and beneficial direction for the community.

In particular, we believe the portion of the Plan for the Palmer property has been developed in a thoughtful, responsible, and beneficial way that will strengthen and serve the community well. From the beginning and throughout the process, Pacific Industrial and the Palmers have met and worked closely with City staff, City Manager(s), and each Councilmember individually to understand the City's desires and direction concerning the Palmer property. This direction and collaboration have resulted in the development of a plan that is responsive to and incorporates the desires, needs, and concerns of the community for both the Palmer property and the broader FCSPU area.

We are grateful to you, the City staff, and the Councilmembers for your efforts on the FCSPU. We fully support the Plan and strongly encourage the City to proceed with its approval and adoption.

Best regards,
(1z� L 1Q
David Palmer
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
1586 Elizabeth St, Redlands, CA 92373
(909) 534-6958
917

ATTACHMENT 8
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
918

Agenda Item No.

City of Yucaipa

PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of June 5, 2024
2 A Regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Yucaipa, California was called to order in the Council Chambers, 34272 Yucaipa Boulevard, Yucaipa, on June 5, 2024, at 6:30 PM.

PRESENT: J.R. Allgower, Chair
Richard Beck, Commissioner
Stacey Chester, Commissioner
David Higginson, Commissioner
Donna Snodgrass, Commissioner
Lyle Vick, Commissioner
ABSENT: None
CITY STAFF: Benjamin Matlock, Deputy Director of Community Development/City Planner Michael Reiter, Assistant City Attorney
Katrina Kunkel, Associate Engineer
Christian Farmer, Assistant Planner
Maria Koolhoven, Planning Commission Assistant

CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 6:36 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Lyle Vick.

ROLL CALL
Michael Reiter, Assistant City Attorney informed the Commissioners that Tony Hicks resigned his seat as a Planning Commissioner before the start of the meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT:

The following members of the public spoke:
• Hansen Wang
6-5-24
919 e 1

PUBLIC HEARINGS
The order of Business for the Public Hearing Shall Be:

A. Open Public Hearing
B. Disclosure of Ex Parte Communications
C. Staff Presentation
D. Applicant/Representative Presentation (if necessary) E. Public Comments
F. Applicant Rebuttal (if necessary)
G. Public Hearing Closed
H. Commission Discussion

1. SUBJECT: FREEWAY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE (CASE NO. 24- 044/GPA/SPA) & PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (21-196/CUP/ARC/TPM): THE

EXISTING FREEWAY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN (FCSP), ADOPTED IN NOVEMBER 2008, ALLOWS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 2,447 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 424.7 ACRES AND UP TO 4,585,779 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES ON 242.7 ACRES WITHIN THE 1,242-ACRE PLAN AREA. THE PROPOSED UPDATE TO THE FCSP (CASE NO. 24-044/GPA/SPA) WOULD RESULT IN A TOTAL OF 2,472 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 5,093,265 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES. AS A RESULT, THE PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD RESULT IN AN INCREASE OF 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 2,786,461 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK (BP), AND A REDUCTION OF 2,278,976

SQUARE FEET OF REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (RC) COMPARED TO THE EXISTING FCSP. THE PROPOSED PROJECT ALSO INCLUDES DEVELOPMENT OF THE PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (21-196/CUP/ARC/TPM), WHICH CONSISTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO (2) BUILDINGS WITH WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE SPACES, TOTALING 2,054,000 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING SPACE, AS WELL AS TRUCK

PARKING AND DOCKING BAYS, CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS INCLUDED IN THE FCSP UPDATE.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and pursuant to Sections 82.0101 and 83.020305 of the Yucaipa Development Code, provide a recommendation to the City Council regarding the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (FCSP) and the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), as well as Case No. 21-196 for the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center.

Depending on the Planning Commission's review and recommendation, several potential motions can be made and are as follows:

Recommendation in support of the FCSP Update:
6317 Sceity Lg Heil Agena

920

If the Planning Commission is in support of the FCSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:
1) Adopt Resolution No. 2024-06, approving the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update; certifying that the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); accepting the mitigation measures identified in the Final SEIR; adopting Findings of Fact; and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and
2) Approve first reading, by title only, as read by staff, of Ordinance No. 448, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, California, amending Ordinance No. 343, amending of the official land use plan and zoning ordinance of the City of Yucaipa; and 3) Approve the Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 21-196), subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in the Agenda Report, and if acceptable, approve the Architectural Design and preliminary landscaping, for the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center Project (POCC); and 4) Adopt the Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and 5) Approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and direct Staff to file a Notice of Determination.

Recommendation against the FCSP Update:

If the Planning Commission is not in support of the FCSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:
1) Direct Staff to prepare a Resolution to deny the approval of the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update; and
2) Direct Staff to prepare Findings for denial, based on the Planning Commission's consideration of the Project with respect to Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code; and 3) Deny Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 21-196), as it is inconsistent with the land use designations of the existing Freeway Corridor Specific Plan; and 4) Determine that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15270 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.

Alternatives:

The Planning Commission can make any additional recommendations to modify the FCSP Update that are deemed necessary to meet the Findings specified by Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code, or that would better meet the Goals, Policies, and/or Objectives of the General Plan. 6-5-24
921ge

Draft Findings of Approval, as well as the Draft Resolution and Ordinance are provided for the Planning Commission's reference and review. Modifications can be made based on the deliberations of the item and will be presented for the City Council's final action.

DISCUSSION:

The following ex parte communications were disclosed. Commissioner Chester met with Pacific Oaks for a meeting about the project and met with the Pumpkin Patch to see how this would affect them and their operation. Commissioner Vick noted that he met with the Pumpkin Patch owners and had a meeting with Pacific Oaks. Commissioner Snodgrass met with Tyler Rameson with the Pumpkin Patch and had a meeting with Pacific Oaks and spoke with Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Bengamin Matlock and Commissioner Chester. Commissioner Beck had no ex parte to disclose.

Commissioner Higginson had a meeting with Pacific Oaks and met with representatives from the Pumpkin Patch. Staff noted that the meetings with Pacific Oaks consisted of materials that were presented in the agenda packet.

Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock presented the Agenda Report.

Commissioner Chester noted traffic concerns and asked staff if the number of big rig trucks staging throughout the city were accounted for in the traffic study. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock stated that the traffic study does address the operations based on the layout of the street that will be developed. Associate Engineer Katrina Kunkel informed the Commission that the traffic study will account for peak hour traffic and that the infrastructure is designed to accommodate when there would be the most concentration of trucks.

Chair Allgower asked staff if the future residential component was included in the traffic study. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock noted that the traffic study assessment included the full build out construction plan.

Commissioner Beck asked staff what tenants/businesses would be occupying the warehouses. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock stated that the buildings speculative, but would let the applicant provide additional information.

Commissioner Chester asked staff if there would be any restriction that that city would impose on the Pumpkin Patch to restrict their current operations. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock informed the Commission that there are no current provisions that would restrict their operations.

Commissioner Higginson noted that he understands the streamlining and focus to protect the Pumpkin Patch. He stated that the Commission does not want to diminish their operation, and that the Pumpkin Patch is a vital business to the community.

P41}B %°EllYK;P Cif gt[d
6-5-24
922ge 4

Terri Allen with Pacific Industrial introduced the rest of the Pacific Industrial staff in attendance with her.

Ms. Allen noted that there is no tenant at this time for either warehouse. Terri Allen thanked staff for the presentation and proceeded with a PowerPoint presentation.

Commissioner Vick stated that the Pacific Industrial plans were a good and well thought out project.

Commissioner Higginson complimented the project and location and appreciated the time put into this project by the applicant. Commissioner Higginson noted that the mix of uses has been a part of the original FCSP and that the update is a refining to the project.

PUBLIC COMMENT
The following members of the public spoke:
• Elijah Silva
• David Martinez
• Zach Strasters
• Hansen Wang
• John Sisley
• Timothy Slade
• Robert Lugan
• Eddie Campos
• Thomas Ruiz
• Tyler Rameson
Dan Floriani with Pacific Oaks noted that he appreciated all the comments. He stated that he loves the Pumpkin Patch and doesn't want to see it go anywhere. He appreciates the Commissions commitment to protect the Pumpkin Patch. Mr. Floriani noted that he is in full support of the Pumpkin Patch and would like to help their operation.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

Commissioner Higginson stated that he appreciates the support, time and effort for the project and the presentations.

Commissioner Chester thanked staff for the presentation and expressed appreciation for all the hard work they do. She noted that the Pumpkin Patch has put the City of Yucaipa on the map and is very passionate about the Pumpkin Patch.

Commissioner Beck stated that he likes development, but has concerns about impacts coming from the warehouses.

Commissioner Vick noted that the million square foot warehouses have the lowest vacancy.

Commissioner Vick stated that he does not have a problem with the development, and he appreciates the proposal of the project.

RIB
i ty ouncil Agendas
923

Commissioner Snodgrass stated that she is concerned about the future projects across the county line and how that will affect the city.

Chair Aligower noted that he does not agree with the zoning change for the Pumpkin Patch. He stated that the open space could be better utilized.

ACTION: MOTION TO CONTINUE THE ITEM TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING ON JULY 17, 2024, BY Commissioner Beck, SECOND BY Commissioner Vick, CARRIED, 5-1-0-0, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

2. SUBJECT: STARLING HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN (CASE NO. 22-129/GPA/SP/TTM 20372): THE STARLING HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN PROVIDES THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR A 14.78-ACRE SITE FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INCLUDES TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) 20372 TO FORMALLY CREATE A 127-UNIT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND ASSOCIATED

COMMUNITY FEATURES INCLUDING A RECREATION CENTER, ACTIVE PARK, DOG

PARK, ENTRY MONUMENTS, AND DETENTION BASINS BASED ON THE SPECIFIC PLAN. A MINOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT IS ALSO PROPOSED TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE SITE SHOWN ON GENERAL PLAN FIGURE CDL-2, LAND USE MAP, FROM RS-20M (SINGLE -RESIDENTIAL, 20,000 SQUARE FOOT

MINIMUM) TO PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT), AND A MODIFICATION TO GENERAL PLAN FIGURE, CDL-3, LAND USE MODIFICATIONS, TO ADD THE STARLING HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED AT THE NE CORNER OF 12TH STREET AND AVENUE E; APNS: 0318-021-18, 19, -44 & -58.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and pursuant to Sections 82.0101 and

83.020305 of the Yucaipa Development Code, provide a recommendation to the City Council regarding the Starling Heights Specific Plan (SHSP) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), as well as the associated Tract Map (TTM 20372).

Depending on the Planning Commission's review and recommendation, several potential motions can be made and are as follows:

Recommendation in support of the SHSP Update:

If the Planning Commission is in support of the SHSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-33, approving the Specific Plan for the proposed Starling Heights Specific Plan and the associated minor General Plan Amendment / Land Use District Change of a property from RS-20M Single Residential, 20,000 square foot minimum lot size) to the land use designation of PD (Planned Development); and
6-5-24
6 924 e

2. Approve first reading, by the title only, as read by staff, of Ordinance No. 449, amending Ordinance No. 343, amending the Official Land Use Plan and Zoning Ordinance as adopted by the City of Yucaipa; and

3. Approve the Tentative Tract Map No. 20372 (Case No. 22-129/TTM 20372), subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in this Agenda Report; and

4. Adopt the Findings as contained in this Agenda Report; and

5. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, finding the mitigation measures and standard measures and procedures will reduce the potential level of environmental impact to less than significant; and

6. Direct staff to file a Notice of Determination; and,

7. Review, and if it is considered acceptable, approve the architectural design and conceptual landscaping for the proposed Project.

Recommendation against the SHSP:

If the Planning Commission is not in support of the SHSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:

1. Direct Staff to prepare a Resolution to deny the approval of the Starling Heights Specific Plan; and

2. Direct Staff to prepare Findings for denial, based on the Planning Commission's consideration of the Project with respect to Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code; and

3. Deny Tentative Tract Map 20372 (Case No. 22-129), as it is inconsistent with the land use designations of the existing Land Use District; and

4. Determine that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15270 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.

Alternatives:

The Planning Commission can make any additional recommendations to modify the SHSP that are deemed necessary to meet the Findings specified by Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code, or that would better meet the Goals, Policies, and/or Objectives of the General Plan.

Draft Findings of Approval, as well as the Draft Resolution and Ordinance are provided for the Planning Commission's reference and review. Modifications can be made based on the deliberations of the item and will be presented for the City Council's final action. 6-5-24
925ge 7

DISCUSSION:

Assistant Planner Christian Farmer presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, William Rockwell, was in attendance via conference call. Mr. Rockwell thank the Commission and Assistant Planner Christian Farmer for his presentation. He noted that both the initial and current concern is density and he tried everything in his power to mitigate that.

Commissioner Beck asked the applicant for the average lot size. Mr. Rockwell informed the Commission that the average lot size is roughly 3,000 sq. ft.

PUBLIC COMMENT
The following members of the public spoke:
• Mike Simpson
• Jillian Simpson
• Brian Taylor
• Hansen Wang
Mr. Rockwell thanked all the public speakers for their comments and stated that they focused on affordability.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

Commissioner Higginson noted that applicant has done a good job with the variety of the aesthetics, and it is a creative use of the land.

Commissioner Chester noted ingress and egress concerns.

Commissioner Beck does not agree with the density of the project.

Commissioner Vick stated that he is tired of the higher -density projects and that these homes are not priced for starter families.

Commissioner Snodgrass expressed density concerns, noting that this project is in the wrong area, and that she also does not like the architectural design.

ACTION #1: MOTION TO APPROVE BY Commissioner Higginson, NOT CARRIED, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.

ACTION #2: MOTION TO DENY THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AS IT IS

INCONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE PROJECT BY Commissioner Chester, SECOND BY Commissioner Snodgrass, CARRIED, 5-1-0-0, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.
p0rtiOAi5°-i{p uo ilLNgenaa
6-5-24
926 Page 8

3. SUBJECT: CASE NO. 24-046/GPA: CITY OF YUCAIPA GENERAL PLAN SAFETY ELEMENT UPDATE.

RECOMMENDAT ON:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and provide a recommendation to the City Council to:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-09, adopting the Safety Element Update to the General Plan; and

2. Determine that the update to the Safety Element is within the scope of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared pursuant to the provisions of Section 15168 of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, for the City's General Plan; and

3. Adopt the Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and

4. Direct staff to file a Notice of Determination.

DISCUSSION:

Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner presented the Agenda Report.

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Chester, SECOND BY Commissioner Snodgrass, CARRIED, 6-0-0-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

ANNOUNCEMENTS: Deputy Director /City Planner Benjamin Matlock noted that the next scheduled Planning Commission Meeting will be held in the middle of July since Chair Allgower will not be available, and we do not have a Vice Chair at this time.

ADJOURNMENT:

The meeting adjourned at 10:48 PM.
njamin Matlock
Deputy Director/City Planner
A ower
Chair of the -Planning Commission
Planning Commission Minutes Page 9
6-5-24
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
927

ATTACHMENT 9
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
928

Agenda Item No.

City of Yucaipa

PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of July 17, 2024
1 A Regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Yucaipa, California was called to order in the Council Chambers, 34272 Yucaipa Boulevard, Yucaipa, on July 17, 2024, at 6:30 PM.

PRESENT: J.R. Allgower, Chair
Stacey Chester, Commissioner
David Higginson, Commissioner
Donna Snodgrass, Commissioner
Lyle Vick, Commissioner
ABSENT: Richard Beck, Commissioner
CITY STAFF: Benjamin Matlock, Deputy Director of Community Development/City Planner Michael Reiter, Assistant City Attorney
Fermin Preciado, Director of Development Services / City Engineer Christian Farmer, Assistant Planner
Katie Syme, Development Services Technician
Maria Koolhoven, Planning Commission Assistant

CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 6:31 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Lyle Vick.

ROLL CALL
Commissioner Richard Beck had an excused absence.

SELECTION OF INTERIM VICE -CHAIR
A. ACTION: MOTION BY Chair Allgower, SECOND BY Commissioner Snodgrass TO SELECT STACEY CHESTER AS INTERIM VICE -CHAIR, MOTION CARRIED 5-0- 1-0.

PlaflaWalfn4iiijstloniMi4tnaia e 1
7-17-24 7�,�

PUBLIC COMMENT:

The following members of the public spoke:
• Chris Venable
• Hansen Wang
• Dr. Newman

CONSENT AGENDA
The following Consent Agenda items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. The Planning Commission will act upon them, at one time, without discussion. Any Commissioner or staff member may request removal of an item from the Consent Agenda for discussion.

1. SUBJECT: APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 1, 2024.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Snodgrass, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 4-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 1. (INTERIM VICE -CHAIR CHESTER WAS NOT IN ATTENDANCE AT THE MAY 1, 2024, PC MEETING).

2. SUBJECT: APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 5, 2024.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Snodgrass, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 2. (WITH THE CORRECTION ON PAGE 8 OF COMMISSIONER CHESTER'S LAST NAME CORRECTED).

DISCUSSION ITEMS

3. SUBJECT: JOHN NEJAD (CASE NO. 23-109/DBA/CUP/ARC): A DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT TO ALLOW A 100 PERCENT INCREASE IN UNIT DENSITY ON A

RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PARCEL, AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 52-UNIT, AGE -RESTRICTED, SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT THAT INCLUDES TWO (2) ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADUS), THAT CONSISTS OF FOUR (4), TWO-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

INCLUDING A CLUB HOUSE, BARBEQUE AREA, COMMUNITY GARDEN AND SITE LANDSCAPING AT 34567 WILDWOOD CANYON ROAD; APNS: 0319-191-19, -27, -28, -29, & -34.
(Continued from May 1, 2024)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission review the proposed colors, materials, and architectural design and, if acceptable, approve Case No. 23-109/PUP/ARC/DBA.

P1at%ia 93fnCi*cton rkelicilgesda
7-17-24
91P get

DISCUSSION:

Assistant Planner:Christian Farmer presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, John Nejad, was in attendance, and stated that he was available to answer any questions the Commission may have.

Commissioner Snodgrass stated the project was 100 percent improved and thanked the applicant for the updates.

PUBLIC COMMENT:

The following members of the public spoke:
• Hansen Wang
ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Snodgrass, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
The order of Business for the Public Hearing Shall Be:

A. Open Public Hearing
B. Disclosure of Ex Parte Communications
C. Staff Presentation
D. Applicant/Representative Presentation (if necessary) E. Public Comments
F. Applicant Rebuttal (if necessary)
G. Public Hearing Closed
H. Commission Discussion
Platy# Vk lUitOON A kilkiit la
7-17-24
93ptbe 3

4. SUBJECT: FREEWAY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE (CASE NO. 24-044/GPA/SPA) & PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (21-196/CUP/ARC/TPM): THE EXISTING FREEWAY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN (FCSP), ADOPTED IN NOVEMBER 2008, ALLOWS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 2,447 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 424.7 ACRES AND UP TO 4,585,779 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES ON 242.7 ACRES WITHIN THE 1,242- ACRE PLAN AREA. THE PROPOSED UPDATE TO THE FCSP (CASE NO. 24-044/GPA/SPA) WOULD RESULT IN A TOTAL OF 2,472 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 5,093,265 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES. AS A RESULT, THE PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD RESULT IN AN INCREASE OF 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 2,786,461 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK (BP), AND A REDUCTION OF 2,278,976 SQUARE FEET OF REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (RC) COMPARED TO THE EXISTING FCSP. THE PROPOSED PROJECT ALSO INCLUDES DEVELOPMENT OF THE PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (21-196/CUP/ARC/TPM), WHICH CONSISTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO (2) BUILDINGS WITH WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE SPACES, TOTALING 2,054,000 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING SPACE, AS

WELL AS TRUCK PARKING AND DOCKING BAYS, CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS INCLUDED IN THE FCSP UPDATE.
(Continued for June 5, 2024)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and pursuant to Sections 82.0101 and 83.020305 of the Yucaipa Development Code, provide a recommendation to the City Council regarding the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (FCSP) and the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), as well as Case No. 21-196 for the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center. If the Planning Commission is in support of the FCSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:
1) Adopt Resolution No. 2024-19, approving the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update; certifying that the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); accepting the mitigation measures identified in the Final SEIR; adopting Findings of Fact; and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and
2) Approve first reading, by title only, as read by staff, of Ordinance No. 448, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, California, amending Ordinance No. 343, amending of the official land use plan and zoning ordinance of the City of Yucaipa; and 3) Approve the Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 21-196), subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in the Agenda Report, and if acceptable, approve the Architectural Design and preliminary landscaping, for the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center Project (POCC); and 4) Adopt the Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and 5) Approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and direct Staff to file a Notice of Determination.

Plat@ 2X3fndit ettonr Midi da
7-17-24
93P2ge 4

Based on the Commission's discussion at the prior Public Hearing, modifications to the FCSP have since been added to the Errata sheet that reflect the interests of the "Pumpkin Factory." -Alternatives:

The Planning Commission can make any additional recommendations to modify the FCSP Update that are deemed necessary to meet the Findings specified by Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code, or that would better meet the Goals, Policies, and/or Objectives of the General Plan.

Draft Findings of Approval, as well as the Draft Resolution and Ordinance are provided for the Planning Commission's reference and review. Modifications can be made based on the deliberations of the item and will be presented for the City Council's final action.

DISCUSSION:

Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock presented the Agenda Report.

Representatives from Pacific Industrial were in attendance but did not wish to make a presentation.

PUBLIC COMMENT
The following members of the public spoke:
• Tyler Ratneson
• Edward Timmons
• Hansen Wang
• Bill Sellers
• Kathy Sellers
• Colleen Wang
• Kevin Miskin
The Public Hearing was then closed.

The following ex parte communications were disclosed. Commissioner Vick noted that spoke with Craig Heaps and Ken Robinson regarding the project provisions on his property.

Commissioner Higginson asked for clarification on the infrastructure aspects of the project. Director of Development Services / City Engineer Fermin Preciado stated that both the FCSP Update and the Pacific Oaks Project both contain Conditions of Approval that were derived from various studies as part of the environmental review. All improvements are required to be completed prior to occupancy of the warehouse and the remaining infrastructure requirements for traffic and transportation are associated with the remaining development with the FCSP.

Commissioner Chester noted traffic concerns and asked if the traffic study considered the trucks that would be parked along the roads throughout the city and causing congestion. Director of Development PlailitrilfgAThirffintisConnivilliftteRla 9pge 5
7-17-24

Services / City Engineer Fermin Preciado noted that the trip generation numbers were taken into consideration.

Commissioner Vick asked for clarification regarding the industrial and regional commercial zoning and what that would mean. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock noted that that this would help protect against the freeway adjacent commercial pads from being warehouses but would allow regional commercial uses such as retail.

Commissioner Snodgrass asked for clarification on where the County line is and stated that she is concerned about the future projects in Calimesa that may affect the city.

ACTION: MOTION TO RECOMMEND THE ITEM FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL THAT WOULD INCLUDE THE ERRATA SHEET EXCEPT FOR ITEM #13, BY Chair Allgower, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, NOT CARRIED, 2-3-1-0, (INTERIM

VICE CHAIR CHESTER, COMMISSIONER SNODGRASS, AND COMMISSIONER VICK VOTED NO) FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

5. SUBJECT: APT TOWERS (CASE NO. 24-011/CUP); A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE REVIEW OF A 75-FOOT-TALL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY DESIGNED AS A EUCALYPTUS TREE, WITH A 200 SQUARE FOOT LEASE AREA FOR THE

ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT WHICH WILL BE SURROUNDED BY AN EIGHT -FOOT -TALL BLOCK WALL LOCATED AT 12954 BRYANT STREET, APN 0319-172-08.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and; A) Review the design and location of the proposed telecommunications facility, and if it is acceptable, approve Conditional Use Permit No. 24-011, subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in the Agenda Report; and
B) Adopt the Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and C) Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, Section 15303 (Class 3); and D) Direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

DISCUSSION:

Commissioner Vick recused himself from the agenda item due to proximity to the site.

Assistant Planner Christian Farmer presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, David Elliott, was in attendance and available to answer any questions the Commissioners may have.

P1a1tWecpW gone it 1a
7-17-24
91P'4ge 6

Commissioner Higginson asked the applicant to explain the safety aspects regarding the cell tower. The applicant, David Elliott, noted that all cell towers are regulated by the FCC and every antenna is very strictly monitored and maintained. Commissioner Snodgrass noted that the EF radiation from the tower has no impact to those below.

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

ACTION #1: MOTION TO APPROVE BY Commissioner Snodgrass, WITH THE

CONDITIONS TO HAVE A SHIELDED CABLE AND EMF SHIELDING PAINT INSIDE THE ELECTRICAL VAULT, NOT CARRIED, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.

ACTION #2: MOTION BY Interim Vice Chair Chester, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 4-0-1-1, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.

6. SUBJECT: ROBERT AND VIOLA CRABB (CASE NO. 24-032/SUP/ARC): A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 1,890 SQUARE FOOT AND 17-FOOT-

TALL STEEL RV CARPORT PROPOSED ON A SINGLE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 36320 WOODBRIAR STREET; APN: 1242-451-08.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and:

A) Review the architectural design of the proposed metal structure, and if it is acceptable, approve the design subject to the Conditions of Approval; and
B) Adopt the Special Use Permit Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and C) Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, Section 15303 (Class 3); and D) Direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

DISCUSSION:

Development Services Technician Katie Syme presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, Robert Crabb, was in attendance and stated that he just needs to cover up his motorhome and thanked the Commission for their time.

Plai4g '2O3brCi •gourMitttgasda
7-17-24
90e
7 PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Vick, SECOND BY Interim Vice -Chair Chester, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 6.

7. SUBJECT: MIKE HAMMER (CASE NO. 24-048/SUP/ARC): A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 17.25-FOOT-TALL AND 1,200 SQUARE FOOT STEEL ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ON A SINGLE -RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12728 DOUGLAS STREET; APN: 0322-103-27.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and:

A) Review the architectural design of the proposed metal structure, and if it is acceptable, approve the design subject to the Conditions of Approval; and
B) Adopt the Special Use Permit Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and C) Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, Section 15303 (Class 3); and D) Direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

DISCUSSION:

Development Services Technician Katie Syme presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, Mike Hammer, was in attendance and stated that he would like to store his tools and trailers.

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Higginson, SECOND BY Interim Vice -Chair Chester, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.

Pla 4MnCrilysyc ItailiAgexida
7-17-24
9Sor8

8. SUBJECT: SHAUN BORDEN (CASE NO. 24-063/PUP/MNV): A PLANNING USE PERMIT TO REAUTHORIZE AN EXPIRED USE PERMIT FOR CASE NO. 17-012, WHICH CONSISTS OF ADDING THIRTEEN (13) SINGLE -STORY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ARRANGED AS DUPLEXES TO A 1.85 ACRE PROPERTY THAT FEATURES AN EXISTING RESIDENCE, LOCATED 34757 AVENUE H, EAST OF THE CORNER OF AVENUE H AND 3RD STREET,

AND A MINOR VARIANCE FOR A REDUCTION OF THE REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW FOR A 10 FOOT, 6 INCH SETBACK IN LIEU OF A 15 FOOT SETBACK.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and:

A) Approve Planning Use Permit No. 24-063 subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in this Agenda Report; and
B) And then close the public hearing, and then Planning Commission review the proposed architecture and conceptual landscape design, and if it is acceptable, approve the design C) Adopt the Findings as contained in this Agenda Report; and D) Adopt the Minor Variance Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and E) Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15305 (Class 5) and 15332 (Class 32) of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and F) Direct Staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

DISCUSSION:

Assistant Planner Christian Farmer presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, Bryce Borden, was in attendance and stated Assistant Planner Christian Farmer covered the project in his presentation.

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Vick, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.

PIa013jET/g2 5101S *AINMetida
7-17-24
9S/ e9

ANNOUNCEMENTS: Deputy Director /City Planner Benjamin Matlock thanked all in attendance. Mr.

Matlock thanked the Commissioners for their input on the FCSP that will be included as part of the information presented to the City Council.

ADJOURNMENT:

The meeting adjourned at 8:22 PM.

BenjaMatlock
Deputy Director/City Planner
JA11gow,
Chair of t
anning Commission
Pla®grg 2U3iuttjsci®lnhNliAptwia
7-17-24
9jige 10

ATTACHMENT 10
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
939

City of Yucaipa
City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority Minutes Regular Meeting of September 23, 2024
City Hall Council Chambers
34272 Yucaipa Blvd., Yucaipa, CA 92399
CLOSED SESSION — 5:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Beaver called the Closed Session meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.

CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Justin Beaver, Mayor
Chris Venable, Mayor Pro Tem
Bobby Duncan, Councilmember
Matt Garner, Councilmember
Jon Thorp, Councilmember
ABSENT: None

PUBLIC COMMENT
There were no comments.

CLOSED SESSION — 5:00 PM
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION - One Claim Claimant: Erica Wells
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant Exposure Pursuant to Paragraph (2) of Subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 Number of Cases (1)
The City Council entered closed session at 5:00 p.m.

OPEN SESSION — 6:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Beaver called to order the Regular Meeting of the City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority at 6:00 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Pledge of Allegiance was led by Captain Walker.

City Council Minutes Page 1 of 12
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
940

CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Justin Beaver, Mayor
Chris Venable, Mayor Pro Tem
Bobby Duncan, Councilmember
Matt Garner, Councilmember
Jon Thorp, Councilmember
ABSENT: None
STAFF
PRESENT: Chris Mann, City Manager
Jennifer Crawford, Assistant City Manager
Steven Graham, City Attorney
Ana Sauseda, Director of General Services/City Clerk

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Steven Graham stated that the City Council gave settlement direction by consensus on Item A.

CHANGES TO THE AGENDA
City Manager Chris Mann pulled Item 11 and stated that it would be brought back at the October 28th meeting.

PUBLIC SAFETY UPDATE
• Police
• Fire
• Code Enforcement
Mayor Beaver tabled the Public Safety Update with no objections from the Council.

CITY COUNCIL CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE
Mayor Beaver asked if there were any conflicts to disclose. There were no items disclosed.

CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Beaver asked if there were any Consent Agenda items to be removed for discussion. Mayor Pro Tem Venable pulled Items 7 & 9 for further discussion.

City Council Minutes Page 2 of 12
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
941

1. SUBJECT: APPROVE THE CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY MINUTES OF AUGUST 26, 2024 AND THE CANCELLED MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 9, 2024.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority minutes of August 26, 2024 and the Cancelled Meeting Minutes of September 9, 2024.

2. SUBJECT: EXTENDING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY DUE TO THE 2022 SEPTEMBER STORM EVENT
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council extend the declaration of a local emergency as a result of the 2022 September Storm Event.

3. SUBJECT: EXTENDING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY DUE TO

TROPICAL STORM HILARY
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council extend the declaration of a local emergency as a result of Tropical Storm Hilary.

4. SUBJECT: BIENNIAL REVIEW OF CITY'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-57, amending the City's Conflict of Interest Code.

5. SUBJECT: MONTHLY REPORT ON YUCAIPA APP USAGE — AUGUST, 2024 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file a report of the user activity on the Yucaipa App for the month of August, 2024.

6. SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2024-58, AMENDING THE 2024

CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-58, amending the 2024 City Council meeting schedule.

8. SUBJECT: MONTHLY TREASURER REPORTS JULY 2024 & AUGUST 2024 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Monthly Treasurer's Report for July 2024 and August 2024.

10. SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT - YUCAIPA COMMUNITY CENTER RESTROOM RENOVATION - PROJECT NO. 11224
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Award and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract and the City Manager or his designee to administer the terms of the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, City Council Minutes Page 3 of 12
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
942

Preferred General Services of Apple Valley, CA, in the amount of $103,934.93 for the Yucaipa Community Center Restroom Renovation - Project No. 11224 (Project); and

2. Approve the amount of $10,000 for construction contract contingency and the amount of $5,000 for construction contract administration, staff time, and inspection costs for a total construction budget in the amount of $118,934.93; and

3. Authorize an amendment to the FY25 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget to increase the Renovate Community Center Restroom (Park Capital Replacement Fund) project budget by $45,000 and decrease the 7th Street (Park) Rehabilitation (General Capital Projects Fund) project budget by $45,000; and

4. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to administer the distribution of the contract contingency; and

5. Approve the plans and specifications prepared for the Project.

12. SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT WORK - 13TH STREET SPORTS COMPLEX FACILITY PARKING LOT LIGHTING PHASE I — PROJECT NO. 11189 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Accept the contract work completed by Quality Light and Electrical in the amount of $58,805 for the 13th Street Sports Complex Facility Parking Lot Lighting Phase I — Project No. 11189; and

2. Authorize the recordation of the Notice of Completion for the Project; and

3. Accept the as -built plans for the Project.

13. SUBJECT: FINAL PARCEL MAP 20525
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Approve Final Parcel Map No. 20525; and

2. Accept and authorize the recordation of the map from JSAMJ, Inc.

14. SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT - INSTALLATION OF CITY FURNISHED HIGH BAY LED LIGHT FIXTURES AND LIGHTING EQUIPMENT AT THE 7TH ST.

COURTS (12385 7TH ST.) — PROJECT NO. 11213
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Award and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract, and the City Manager or his designee to administer the terms of the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, LogicLamp Technologies of Fullerton, CA in the amount $46,031.35 for the Installation of City Furnished High Bay LED Light Fixtures and Lighting Equipment at the 7th St. Courts (12385 7th St.) — Project No. 11213 (Project); and City Council Minutes Page 4 of 12
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
943

2. Approve the amount of $4,600 for construction contract contingency and the amount of $2,300 for construction contract administration, staff time, permitting and inspection costs for a total construction budget in the amount of $52,931.35; and

3. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to administer the distribution of the contract contingency; and

4. Approve the plans and specifications prepared for the Project.

15. SUBJECT: JOINT USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA AND

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, DUNLAP BOULEVARD
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Approve the Joint Use Agreement between the City of Yucaipa and Southern California Edison Company for the relocation and joint use of easements in connection with improvements to Dunlap Boulevard and Oak Glen Road; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and any necessary documents to effectuate the terms of the Joint Use Agreement.

16. SUBJECT: ACOSTA INVESTMENTS, LLC (FALLBROOK): A DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT FOR CASE NO. 22-121/GPA/LUCR/ARC WHICH WILL COVENANT TEN (10) PERCENT (17 UNITS) OF THE TOTAL 172 UNITS AS LOW-INCOME

AFFORDABLE PURSUANT TO YUCAIPA DENSITY BONUS STANDARDS TO

UTILIZE AN INCENTIVE AND MODIFIED PARKING STANDARDS FOR A PROJECT LOCATED ACROSS FOUR (4) PARCELS; APNS: 0319-253-28, -29, -30, - 84 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the attached Density Bonus Agreement (DBA) for Case No. 22-121, the Fallbrook Apartment Project (Project), which will set forth the reporting requirements and covenants that are necessary to ensure that the target affordable units remain consistent with the original density bonus request associated with the approved entitlement.

17. SUBJECT: SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION — YUCAIPA EQUESTRIAN ARENA RODEO COMMITTEE 2025 RODEO
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Approve the Special Event Permit Application submitted by the Yucaipa Equestrian Arena Rodeo Committee to conduct the 2025 Yucaipa Rodeo on Friday, May 16, 2025, and Saturday, May 17, 2025; and

2. Approve the City's Co-sponsorship for the 2025 Yucaipa Rodeo to include use of City owned equipment and the City -owned vacant lot directly across the street; and

3. Waive the Special Event Permit Application fee of $200; and City Council Minutes Page 5 of 12
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
944

4. Review and approve the street closures identified in the agenda report; and

5. Waive the provisions of Yucaipa Municipal Code Section 12.06.030, regarding overnight camping, for the duration of the event.

18. SUBJECT: SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION — ST. FRANCES XAVIER CABRINI TO CONDUCT A FALL FESTIVAL ON SATURDAY OCTOBER 12, 2024.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a Special Event Permit Application submitted by St. Frances Xavier Cabrini to conduct a Fall Festival on Saturday October 12, 2024.

19. SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2024-56 — ESTABLISHING THE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND 2025 ANNUAL REGISTRATION FEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION

AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE YUCAIPA MOBILEHOME RENT STABILIZATION

ORDINANCE
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-56, establishing the Administrative Rules for the Implementation of the Yucaipa Mobilehome Rent Stabilization Ordinance and establishing the 2025 Annual Registration Fee for the Enforcement of the Ordinance.

ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER DUNCAN, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM VENABLE, CARRIED 5-0, TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS NO. 1 THROUGH 19 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEMS 7, 9 (PULLED FOR DISCUSSION) AND ITEM 11 (CONTINUED TO A FUTURE MEETING).

ITEM(S) REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION

9. SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2024 & FISCAL YEAR 2025 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT REPORT — SEPTEMBER 2024
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Approve the Budget Adjustments Requiring of Council Approval (Attachments 1, 3 and 5); and

2. Receive and file the Staff Approved Budget Adjustments (Attachments 2 & 4).

DISCUSSION: Director of Finance White presented the Agenda Report.

ACTION: MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM VENABLE, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER THORP, CARRIED 5-0, TO APPROVE ITEM 9.

7. SUBJECT: ARCTIC WOLF RENEWAL
City Council Minutes Page 6 of 12
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
945

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Approve and authorize the renewal of 155 Arctic Wolf user license subscriptions and 5 site sensor subscriptions, from Savant Solutions, Inc., in the amount of $63,388 for year 1, $71,093 for year 2, and $74,648 for year 3; and

2. Find that the public interest will not be best served by a formal proposal process, waive the formal solicitation of proposals/qualifications and award the Arctic Wolf renewal based on the quote submitted by Savant Solutions, Inc.; and

3. Approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $3,388 to meet the year 1 renewal amount of $63,388.

DISCUSSION: IT Manager Kevin Johnston presented the Agenda Report.

After Council discussion the following motion was made:

ACTION: MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM VENABLE, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER THORP, CARRIED 5-0, TO APPROVE ITEM 7.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

20. SUBJECT: WILDWOOD CANYON MOBILE HOME ESTATES AND VALLEY

VIEW MOBILEHOME PARK REVENUE BONDS
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 2024-55, approving the issuance of revenue bonds by the Independent Cities Finance Authority with respect to the acquisition and renovation of Wildwood Canyon Mobile Home Estates and the renovation of Valley View Mobilehome Park. • Public Hearing Opened
Mayor Beaver opened the Public Hearing for Item No. 20 at 6:18 p.m. • Staff Presentation
Director of Finance White presented the Agenda Report.
• Applicant Presentation
There was no applicant presentation.
• Public Comments
There were no comments.
• Applicant Rebuttal
There was no applicant rebuttal.

City Council Minutes Page 7 of 12
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
946

Public Hearing Closed
Mayor Beaver closed the Public Hearing at 6:20p.m.

ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER THORP, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER DUNCAN, CARRIED 5-0, TO APPROVE STAFF'S
RECOMMENDATION.

21. SUBJECT: FREEWAY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE (CASE NO. 24- 044/GPA/SPA) & PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (21-
196/CUP/ARC/TPM):

The existing Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (FCSP), adopted in November 2008, allows for development of up to 2,447 residential units on 424.7 acres and up to 4,585,779 square feet of nonresidential uses on 242.7 acres within the 1,242-acre plan area. The proposed update to the FCSP (Case No. 24-044/GPA/SPA) would result in a total of 2,472 residential units and 5,093,265 square feet of nonresidential uses. As a result, the proposed Project would result in an increase of 25 residential units, 2,786,461 square feet of Business Park (BP), and a reduction of 2,278,976 square feet of Regional Commercial (RC) compared to the existing FCSP. The Proposed Project also includes development of the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center (21-196/CUP/ARC/TPM), which consists of the development of two (2) buildings with warehouse and office spaces, totaling 2,054,000 square feet of building space, as well as truck parking and docking bays, consistent with the provisions included in the FCSP Update. (Continued from August 26, 2024)
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a public hearing regarding the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (FCSP) and the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), as well as Case No. 21-196 for the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center. The Planning Commission has previously reviewed the FCSP and did not offer a recommendation for approval.

Depending on the City Council's review, several potential motions can be made and are as follows:

Motion in support of the FCSP Update:

If the City Council is in support of the FCSP, the following recommendation is provided:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-19, approving the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update with the items listed in the errata; certifying that the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); accepting the mitigation measures identified in the Final SEIR; adopting Findings of Fact; and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and

2. Approve first reading, by title only, as read by staff, of Ordinance No. 448, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, California, amending Ordinance No. 343, amending of the official land use plan and zoning ordinance of the City of Yucaipa; and
City Council Minutes Page 8 of 12
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
947

3. Approve the Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 21-196), subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in the Agenda Report, and if acceptable, approve the Architectural Design and preliminary landscaping, for the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center Project (POCC); and

4. Adopt the Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and

5. Approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and direct Staff to file a Notice of Determination.

Motion against the FCSP Update:

If the City Council is not in support of the FCSP, the following motion is provided:

1. Direct Staff to prepare a Resolution to deny the approval of the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update; and

2. Direct Staff to prepare Findings for denial, based on the City Council's consideration of the Project with respect to Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code; and

3. Deny Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 21-196), as it is inconsistent with the land use designations of the existing Freeway Corridor Specific Plan; and

4. Determine that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15270 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.

Alternatives:

The City Council can make any additional recommendations to modify the FCSP Update that are deemed necessary to meet the Findings specified by Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code, or that would better meet the Goals, Policies, and/or Objectives of the General Plan.

Draft Findings of Approval, as well as the Draft Resolution and Ordinance are provided for the City Council's reference and review. Modifications can also be made based on the deliberations of the item. No formal findings for denial were provided by the Planning Commission, and therefore are not available. However, Commissioners noted a desire for additional commercial activity and to ensure that the property owner's interests were protected. Council may also deny the Specific Plan Update as proposed but certify the SEIR by amending Resolution No. 2024-19. In this scenario, adopting Ordinance No. 448 may also be prudent as a clean-up item to the General Plan map. • Public Hearing Opened
Mayor Beaver opened the Public Hearing for Item No. 21 at 6:21 p.m.

City Council Minutes Page 9 of 12
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
948

Staff Presentation
Deputy Director of Community Development/City Planner Matlock presented the Agenda Report.

Applicant Presentation
Brief presentation from Pacific Oaks.
• Public Comments
The following members of the public spoke:
➢ Amy Ochs
➢ Edward Timmons
➢ Ronnie Gustason
➢ Victor Espinosa
➢ Ro Randolph
➢ Linda Witham
➢ Craig Heaps
➢ James Comazzi
➢ Hansen Wang
➢ Colleen Wang
➢ David Duron
➢ Jon Flick
➢ James Dodaro
➢ Gil Turnquist
➢ David Matuszak
➢ Sandra Thompson
➢ Ward Thompson
➢ Keith Hale
➢ Kathy Sellers
➢ Hector Rivera
➢ Marcus S
➢ Jeffrey Scott
➢ Walter Scott
Mayor Pro Tem Venable left the dais at 7:54 p.m. and returned at 7:57 p.m. ➢ Tim Slade
➢ Tyler Rameson
➢ Abraham Issa
D. Joanne Lessard
➢ Gabriele Allen
➢ Robert Ramos
➢ Tim Mullins
➢ Robert Rentschler
Councilmember Garner left the dais at 8:16 p.m. and returned at 8:20 p.m.

City Council Minutes Page 10 of 12
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
949

➢ William Wesson
➢ Jim Butler
➢ Chris Palmer
➢ Kristine Mohler
➢ Michelle Poe
➢ David Palmer
• Applicant Rebuttal
Brief rebuttal from Pacific Industrial.

Public Hearing Closed
Mayor Beaver closed the Public Hearing at 8:40 p.m.

After Council discussion, the following Motion was made:

ACTION: MOTION BY MAYOR BEAVER, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARNER, CARRIED 3-2, (COUNCILMEMBER DUNCAN AND MAYOR PRO

TEM VENABLE VOTED NO) TO ADOPT THE AMENDED RESOLUTION

CERTIFYING THE EIR, INCLUDING THE MITIGATION MEASURES

FINDINGS AND FACTS AND STATEMENT OF OVERIDING

CONSIDERATIONS AND TABLE THE ORDINANCE, CONDITIONAL USE

PERMIT, AND THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN UNTIL THE CITY MANAGER

CAN BRING BACK AN AMENDMENT WHICH ADDRESSES THE CONCERNS OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND RESIDENTS.

Councilmember Duncan left the dais at 9:03 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Beaver asked the public to maintain decorum and civility during public comment.

The following members of the public spoke:
➢ Hansen Wang
➢ Colleen Wang
➢ Jo Sutt
➢ Ro Randolph
D. Kathy Sellers
➢ Denise Work
➢ Richard Hernandez
➢ Brandon Mihld
➢ Jim D'Amico

COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
Mayor Beaver acknowledged the first responders and all their efforts during the recent fires and spoke about the upcoming Five Winds Country Music Festival.

City Council Minutes Page 11 of 12
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
950

Mayor Pro Tem Venable spoke about the upcoming Autmnfest event and the Five Winds Country Music Festival. He urged the community to apply for the Youth Advisory Committee.

ANNOUNCEMENTS
The next regularly scheduled meeting will be October 28, 2024 at 6:00 p.m.

ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m.

Jus n Beaver, Mayor
ATTES
Ana V. °auseda, MMC
Director of General Services/City Clerk
City Council Minutes Page 12 of 12
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
951

ATTACHMENT 11
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
952

City of Yucaipa
City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority Minutes Regular Meeting of April 28, 2025
City Hall Council Chambers
34272 Yucaipa Blvd., Yucaipa, CA 92399
CLOSED SESSION — 4:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Thorp called the Closed Session meeting to order at 4:30 p.m.

CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Jon Thorp, Mayor
Chris Venable, Mayor Pro Tem
Bob Miller, Councilmember
Judy Woolsey, Councilmember
ABSENT: Justin Beaver, Councilmember

PUBLIC COMMENT
There were no comments.

CLOSED SESSION — 4:30 PM
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Yucaipa Preservation Society v. City of Yucaipa, et al. San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVSB2308052
B. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS — Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
Agency Designated Representative: Interim City Manager
Represented Employees: Yucaipa City Employees Association & Unrepresented Management, Supervisory and Confidential Employees
C. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT (PROCESS DISCUSSION)
Pursuant to Section 54957
Title: City Manager
The City Council entered Closed Session at 4:30 p.m.

City Council Minutes Page 1 of 6
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
953

OPEN SESSION — 6:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Thorp called to order the Regular Meeting of the City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority at 6:05 p.m.

INVOCATION
The invocation was led by Pastor Olin Richey of the Calimesa Worship Center.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Pledge of Allegiance was led by Captain Mike Walker.

CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Jon Thorp, Mayor
Chris Venable, Mayor Pro Tem
Bob Miller, Councilmember
Judy Woolsey, Councilmember
ABSENT: Justin Beaver, Councilmember
STAFF
PRESENT: Jennifer Crawford, Interim City Manager
Tuan-Anh Vu, Assistant City Attorney
Ana Sauseda, Director of General Services/City Clerk

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Assistant City Attorney Tuan-Anh Vu indicated that there was no reportable action.

CHANGES TO THE AGENDA
Interim City Manager Crawford stated that there were no changes to the agenda however, a public hearing notice regarding firearm storage fees was published in the newspaper but that item was pushed to the May 12, 2025 City Council meeting instead.

PUBLIC SAFETY UPDATE
• Police — Captain Walker presented the statistics for March, 2025. • Fire — Chief Malinowski presented the statistics for March, 2025. • Code Enforcement — Trevor Benson, Public Safety Manager, presented the statistics for March, 2025.

City Council Minutes Page 2 of 6
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
954

PUBLIC COMMENT
The following members of the public spoke:
• Minister Cliff
• Richard Frost
• Carol Rehm
• Hansen Wang

CITY COUNCIL CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE
Mayor Thorp asked if there were any conflicts to disclose. There were no items disclosed.

CONSENT AGENDA

1. SUBJECT: APPROVE THE CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY MINUTES OF APRIL 14, 2025
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority minutes of April 14, 2025.

2. SUBJECT: MONTHLY REPORT ON YUCAIPA APP USAGE — MARCH 2025 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file a report of the user activity on the Yucaipa App for the month of March, 2025.

3. SUBJECT: DRAFT FY2025/2026 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Review and approve the Draft FY2025/2026 Pavement Management Program; and

2. Approve the recommended pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects for FY2025/2026.

4. SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA DATE STAMPING POLICY RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and adopt the Date Stamping Policy.

5. SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH COLE

HUBER LLP
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Interim City Manager to execute the Legal Services Agreement with Cole Huber LLP.

City Council Minutes
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda

955

6. SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR INTERIM CITY

MANAGER
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Employment Agreement with Jennifer Crawford for the position of Interim City Manager, effective retroactively to April 1, 2025.

There was brief discussion regarding Item 2. By consensus, the Council requested that this item be presented as a discussion item going forward.

ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM VENABLE, CARRIED 4-0-1, (COUNCILMEMBER BEAVER WAS ABSENT) TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NOS. 1 THROUGH 6.

DISCUSSION ITEMS

7. SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT ENGINE REPLACEMENT
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Review options and provide direction on the procurement of two (2) new KME Severe Service Pumper Fire Engines; and

2. If the prepay option is selected, approve a FY25 budget adjustment and a change order to the existing Fire Apparatus Solutions purchase order in the amount of $2,150,580; and

3. Authorize the Mayor to execute any necessary agreements to carryout Council direction.

DISCUSSION: Chief Malinowski presented the Agenda Report.

Council directed staff to prepare a letter in support of a congressional inquiry into potential antitrust issues affecting firefighting equipment manufacturing, for review at the next Council meeting.

After Council discussion, the following Motion was made:

ACTION: MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM VENABLE, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, CARRIED 4-0-1, (COUNCILMEMBER BEAVER WAS ABSENT) TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION #2.

8. SUBJECT: JUNE 30, 2024 ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT &

ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION ENGAGEMENT
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the June 30, 2024 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report & Alternative Compliance Examination Engagement.

City Council Minutes
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda

956

DISCUSSION: Director of Finance White presented the Agenda Report.

After Council discussion, the following Motion was made:

ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER WOOLSEY, CARRIED 4-0-1, (COUNCILMEMBER
BEAVER WAS ABSENT) TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE REPORT.

STUDY SESSION

9. SUBJECT: 24-044/GPA/SPA: DIRECTION REGARDING FREEWAY CORRIDOR

SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a study session and:

1. Provide policy direction to staff on the preferred option for the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (FCSP) Update based on the analysis and community feedback presented in this report.

2. If the Council selects either Option 2 or Option 3, authorize the Interim City Manager to execute an amendment to the existing Professional Services Agreement with Placeworks to update the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) in accordance with CEQA requirements, in an amount not to exceed $50,000.

3. If the Council selects Option 4, direct staff to return to Council with a proposal for initiating a new FCSP Update, along with a proposed budget for the FY 25/26 Budget that includes an amendment to the Agreement with Placeworks for the preparation of a new SEIR, in an amount not to exceed $1,001,500 plus a 10% contingency for a total amount of $1,101,650.

DISCUSSION: Deputy Director of Community Development/City Planner Matlock presented the Agenda Report.

The following members of the public spoke:
• Kathy Sellers
• Ed Timmons
• Leola Green
• Maria Corn
• Linda Witham
• David Matuszak
• Gilbert Turnquist
• Holly Warner
• Dede Chudy
• Lloyd Rekstad
• Carla McCorkle
• Kristine Mohler
City Council Minutes Page 5 of 6
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
957

• Colleen Wang
• Hansen Wang
• Meredith Sherwin
• Craig Heaps
• Kevin Miskin
• Martha Glubka
• Ro Randolph
• Joanne Lessard
• Rain Mendoza
• Brian Roche
• Chuck
After Council discussion, the direction to staff was to prepare a summary of this item, replace option 4 with an updated map provided by the property representative, and bring it back to the May 12th City Council meeting for a formal vote.

COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
Councilmember Woolsey attended a presentation of Anne Frank's life and legacy at Green Valley High School.

Mayor Pro Tem spoke about the Run for the Hills event. He announced Healthy Yucaipa's upcoming lecture series and encouraged the public to attend.

Mayor Thorp announced the upcoming ribbon cutting ceremony for the new Raising Cane's. He asked Director of Community Services Megan Wolfe to provide a brief report on the recent Shrek Rave. She also announced the upcoming Music & Arts Festival, the Wizard of Oz at the Yucaipa Performing Arts Center, and the Love Yucaipa event.

ANNOUNCEMENTS
The next regular meeting will be held on Monday, May 12, 2025.

ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
a Lseda, MMC
Director of General Services/City Clerk
City Council Minutes

08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
958

ATTACHMENT 12
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
959

City of Yucaipa
City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority Minutes Regular Meeting of May 12, 2025
City Hall Council Chambers
34272 Yucaipa Blvd., Yucaipa, CA 92399
CLOSED SESSION — 4:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Thorp called the Closed Session meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.

CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Jon Thorp, Mayor
Chris Venable, Mayor Pro Tem
Justin Beaver, Councilmember (present via telephone)
Bob Miller, Councilmember
Judy Woolsey, Councilmember
ABSENT: None

PUBLIC COMMENT
There were no comments.

CLOSED SESSION — 4:00 PM
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION — Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code §54956.9:
1 case
B. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS - Pursuant to Government Code §54956.8
Property: Portion of property located at 32664 Yucaipa Boulevard, APN No. 0299-321- 85 & 86
City Negotiator: Jennifer Crawford, Interim City Manager Negotiating Parties: City of Yucaipa
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms for Disposition of Property by City C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9)
Ana Sauseda v. George Sardeson, et al., California Court of Appeal Case No. E083758 (Wang Appeal)
City Council Minutes Page 1 of 13
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
960

D. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS — Pursuant to Government Code §54957.6
Agency Designated Representative: Interim City Manager
Represented Employees: Yucaipa City Employees Association & Unrepresented Management, Supervisory and Confidential Employees
E. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT (PROCESS DISCUSSION)
Pursuant to Section 54957
Title: City Manager
The City Council entered Closed Session at 4:00 p.m. with Councilmember Beaver present via telephone.

OPEN SESSION — 6:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Thorp called to order the Regular Meeting of the City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority at 6:00 p.m.

INVOCATION
The invocation was led by Pastor Della Vaughn of Green Valley Christian.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Pledge of Allegiance was led by Captain Mike Walker.

CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Jon Thorp, Mayor
Chris Venable, Mayor Pro Tem
Justin Beaver, Councilmember
Bob Miller, Councilmember
Judy Woolsey, Councilmember
ABSENT: None
STAFF
PRESENT: Jennifer Crawford, Interim City Manager
Steven Graham Pacifico, City Attorney
Ana Sauseda, Director of General Services/City Clerk
City Council Minutes Page 2 of 13
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
961

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Steven Pacifico stated that the Council gave direction on Item A, to initiate the code enforcement case, by a vote of 5-0.

CHANGES TO THE AGENDA
Interim City Manager Crawford announced that there were no changes to the agenda.

SPECIAL PRESENTATION
Executive Director Jennifer Hurlbut was unavailable to attend the meeting for the presentation of YAPS Dog of the Month.

PUBLIC COMMENT
The following members of the public spoke:
• Hansen Wang
• Mary Ruhter
• Rachael Gustason

CITY COUNCIL CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE
Mayor Thorp asked if there were any conflicts to disclose. There were no items disclosed by members of the Council with the exception of Mayor Thorp who announced that he would abstain from voting on Item 15 due to his employment with the Sheriff s Department.

CONSENT AGENDA

1. SUBJECT: APPROVE THE CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY MINUTES OF APRIL 28, 2025
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority minutes of April 28, 2025.

2. SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025 ACCOUNTABILITY REPORTS RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive the Community Activity Grant Accountability Reports and deem the program requirements complete for the following:
• Childhood Cancer Foundation of Southern California, Inc. • Family Service Association of Redlands
• Inland Leaders Charter School
• Rotary Club of Yucaipa — Weekly Meetings
• Rotary Club of Yucaipa — Christmas Parade
• Yucaipa Calimesa Family Assistance
• Yucaipa Calimesa Veterans Day Committee
• Yucaipa Pickleball, Inc.

City Council Minutes Page 3 of 13
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
962

3. SUBJECT: FY26 ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL CONTRACT
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Interim City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with the County of San Bernardino for the provision of animal care and control services in an amount not to exceed $575,089.

4. SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-12, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE TO

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT A REPORT OF DELINQUENT SOLID

WASTE CHARGES
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-12, setting a time and place to conduct a public hearing to adopt a report of delinquent solid waste charges and directing the City Clerk to file said report with the County of San Bernardino for inclusion of such charges on the property tax rolls as a special assessment.

5. SUBJECT: MONTHLY TREASURER'S REPORT MARCH 2025
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Monthly Treasurer's Report for March 2025.

6. SUBJECT: SUMMER LUNCH PROGRAM AGREEMENT
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Interim City Manager to execute an Agreement for the Summer Lunch Program (Program) between the City of Yucaipa (City) and the Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Unified School District (District), to be held Monday through Friday, from June 10, 2025, through July 18, 2025, excluding holiday closures, at Yucaipa Community Park.

7. SUBJECT: FACILITY USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA

AND YU-CAL FOOTBALL AND CHEER
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Interim City Manager to execute an Agreement between the City of Yucaipa (City) and Yu -Cal Football and Cheer Inc. (Organization).

8. SUBJECT: SPONSORSHIP POLICY
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and adopt the Sponsorship Policy.

9. SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SEND LETTERS IN SUPPORT OF A

CONGRESSIONAL INQUIRY INTO POTENTIAL ANTITRUST ISSUES AFFECTING

FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Mayor to send letters in support of a Congressional inquiry into potential antitrust issues affecting firefighting equipment manufacturing.

City Council Minutes Page 4 of 13
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
963

10. SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT WORK — CITY YARD LANDSCAPING PROJECT — PROJECT NO. 11191
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Accept the contract work completed by David 011is Landscape Development in the amount of $214,634 for the City Yard Landscaping Project — Project No. 11191 (Project); and

2. Authorize the recordation of the Notice of Completion for the Project; and

3. Accept the as -built plans for the Project.

12. SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT —ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR

THE LOW WATER CROSSING REPLACEMENT PROJECT - LIVE OAK CANYON

ROAD AT WILDWOOD CREEK
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Award and authorize the Interim City Manager to execute a contract, and the Interim City Manager or her designee administer the terms of the contract with J. Smith & T.

Muli Inc. of Irvine, CA in the amount of $605,905 for the Engineering Design Services for the Low Water Crossing Replacement Project - Live Oak Canyon Road at Wildwood Creek; and

2. Approve the amount of $30,000 for contract contingency and the amount of $25,000, for staff time, contract administration and project coordination for a total engineering design budget in the amount of $660,905 for the Project; and

3. Authorize the Interim City Manager or her designee to administer the distribution of the contract contingency.

13. SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF 2024 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 3500 DUMP BED RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the Interim City Manager to execute a purchase contract for the acquisition of one (1) new 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 4WD Dump Bed Truck.

14. SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER FOR EXTRICATION EQUIPMENT
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive notification that a purchase order for Fire Etc. in the amount of $34,164 for the purchase of emergency extrication tools was executed.

City Council Minutes Page 5 of 13
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
964

15. SUBJECT: FY26 SHERIFF'S SCHEDULE -A CONTRACT
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Mayor Pro Tem to execute an amendment to the Law Enforcement Services Contract between the City of Yucaipa and the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, for a total annual service contract in an amount not -to -exceed $13,870,394 less the annual personnel credit in the amount of $649,851, for a total net contract amount of not -to -exceed $13,220,543 for FY 2025-26.

ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER BEAVER, SECOND BY MAYOR

PRO TEM VENABLE TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS:
• NO. 1 CARRIED 4-0-1 (COUNCILMEMBER BEAVER ABSTAINED)
• NOS 2 THROUGH 10 & 12 THROUGH 14, CARRIED 5-0
• NO. 15 CARRIED 4-0-1 (MAYOR THORP ABSTAINED)

ITEM(S) REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION

11. SUBJECT: SUMMARY VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED AT 12475 5TH STREET
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-08, vacating a portion of unnecessary public right-of-way located at 12475 5th Street; and

2. Approve the related actions included in the resolution; and

3. Authorize the Interim City Manager, or her designee to execute the necessary documents to complete the right-of-way vacation process.

DISCUSSION: Director of Development Services/City Engineer Preciado presented the Agenda Report.

After Council discussion, the following Motion was made:

ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER BEAVER, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM VENABLE, CARRIED 5-0, TO APPROVE STAFF'S
RECOMMENDATION.

City Council Minutes Page 6 of 13
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
965

DISCUSSION ITEMS

16. SUBJECT: UPPER WILDWOOD CREEK BASIN PROJECT FUNDING OPTIONS RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Receive a report on potential project funding options; and

2. Direct staff to delay the construction of the Upper Wildwood Creek Basin Project and incorporate the Project into the strategic planning effort to develop a sustainable and long-term funding strategy for the City's public infrastructure projects; and

3. Direct staff to request reallocation of grant funding toward other eligible City drainage infrastructure project(s).

DISCUSSION: Assistant City Engineer Kern presented the Agenda Report.

After Council discussion, the following Motion was made:

ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER BEAVER, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM VENABLE, CARRIED 5-0, TO APPROVE STAFF'S
RECOMMENDATION.

17. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 455 - ADDING CHAPTER 10.16 VEHICLE

ABATEMENT TO THE YUCAIPA MUNICIPAL CODE
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 455, an Ordinance of the City of Yucaipa, California, adding Chapter

10.16 to Title 10 of the Yucaipa Municipal Code Regarding Vehicle Abatement.

DISCUSSION: Public Safety Manager Benson presented the Agenda Report.

After Council discussion, the following Motion was made:

ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER WOOLSEY, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, CARRIED 5-0, TO THE INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 455, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 10.16 TO TITLE 10 OF THE YUCAIPA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING VEHICLE ABATEMENT.

18. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 456 - ADDING CHAPTER 10.20 TO TITLE 10 OF THE

YUCAIPA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING VEHICLE TOWING
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 456, an Ordinance of the City of Yucaipa, California, adding Chapter

10.20 to Title 10 of the Yucaipa Municipal Code Regarding Vehicle Towing.

City Council Minutes Page 7 of 13
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
966

DISCUSSION: Public Safety Manager Benson presented the Agenda Report.

ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER BEAVER, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM VENABLE, CARRIED 5-0, TO APPROVE THE INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 456, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 10.20 TO TITLE 10 OF THE YUCAIPA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING VEHICLE TOWING.

19. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 457 - AMENDING FIREWORKS FINES TO ADDRESS

EXTREME FIRE RISK
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 457, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, California, adding Chapter 8.40 to Title 8 of the Yucaipa Municipal Code regarding fireworks.

DISCUSSION: Public Safety Manager Benson presented the Agenda Report.

After Council discussion, the following Motion was made:

ACTION: MOTION BY MAYOR THORP, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER
BEAVER, CARRIED 5-0, TO APPROVE THE INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 457, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 8.40 TO TITLE 8 OF THE YUCAIPA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING FIREWORKS, WITH THE AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 8.40.040, INCREASING FINES TO $3,000 FOR THE FIRST VIOLATION, $5,000 FOR THE SECOND VIOLATION, AND $10,000 FOR THE THIRD AND SUBSEQUENT VIOLATIONS.

20. SUBJECT: DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION:

1. That the City Council review the draft fiscal year 2025-2026 budget and provide direction to staff as appropriate; and

2. That the Successor Agency to the Yucaipa Redevelopment Agency review the draft fiscal year 2025-2026 budget and provide direction to staff, as appropriate; and

3. That the Yucaipa Housing Authority review the draft fiscal year 2025-2026 budget and provide direction to staff, as appropriate.

DISCUSSION: Interim City Manager Crawford introduced Item No. 20 and Director of Finance White presented the Agenda Report.

Mayor Pro Tem Venable left the dais at 7:04 p.m. and returned at 7:05 p.m.

After Council discussion, the following Motion was made:

City Council Minutes Page 8 of 13
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
967

ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM VENABLE, CARRIED 5-0, TO APPROVE STAFF'S
RECOMMENDATION.

21. SUBJECT: 24-044/GPA/SPA: DIRECTION REGARDING FREEWAY CORRIDOR

SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Review the different options for the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (FCSP) Update and provide direction to staff to proceed with Option 3 and authorize the Interim City Manager to execute an amendment to the existing Professional Services Agreement with Placeworks to update the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) in accordance with CEQA requirements, in an amount not to exceed $50,000; or

2. Should the City Council have another preferred option, the following action regarding the environmental review costs would include:
a. If the Council selects Option 1, direct staff to return to Council with a FY 25/26 Budget that includes the write off of $748,413 as it would no longer be eligible for reimbursement.
b. If the Council selects Option 4, direct staff to return to Council with a proposal for initiating a new FCSP Update, along with a proposed budget for the FY 25/26 Budget that includes an amendment to the Agreement with Placeworks for the preparation of a new SEIR, in an amount not to exceed $1,001,500 plus a 10% contingency for a total amount of $1,101,650.
c. If the Council selects Option 5, direct staff to return to Council with a FY 25/26 Budget that includes the write off of $748,413 (if the existing FCSP layout is maintained) or with a proposal for initiating a new FCSP Update and for the preparation of a new SEIR, along with a proposed budget for the FY 25/26 Budget in that amount.

DISCUSSION: Director of Development Services/City Engineer Preciado presented the Agenda Report.

The following members of the public spoke:
• Pamela Smyth, Redlands
• Ms. Green
• Susan Zahn, Yucaipa
• Holly Warner, Yucaipa
• Hansen Wang, Yucaipa
• Justin Bergh, Yucaipa
• David Duron, Yucaipa
City Council Minutes Page 9 of 13
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
968

• Lloyd Rekstad, Yucaipa
• Kristine Mohler, Yucaipa
• Ro Randolph, Yucaipa
• Kevin Miskin, Yucaipa
• Kathy Sellers, Yucaipa
• Rain Mendoza, Yucaipa
The following Property Owners and/or Property Owner Representatives spoke:
• Craig Heaps, West Coast Entitlements
• Dan Floriani, Pacific Industrial
Mayor Thorp left the dais at 7:44 p.m. and returned at 7:46 p.m.

Councilmember Miller left the dais at 7:46 p.m. and returned at 7:48 p.m.

Mayor Pro Tem Venable left the dais at 7:48 p.m. and returned at 7:49 p.m.

Councilmember Woolsey left the dais at 9:14 p.m. and returned at 9:16 p.m.

Councilmember Miller left the dais at 9:37 p.m. and returned at 9:38 p.m.

Mayor Pro Tem Venable left the dais at 9:38 p.m. and returned at 9:40 p.m.

Councilmember Beaver left the dais at 10:09 p.m. and returned at 10:11 p.m.

After Council discussion, the following Motion was made:

ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER WOOLSEY, CARRIED 4-1, (MAYOR PRO TEM VENABLE VOTED NO) TO PROCEED WITH OPTION #3.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

22. SUBJECT: ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council continue the Public Hearing for Annual Adjustment of Development Impact Fees to the City Council meeting of June 9, 2025. • Public Hearing Opened
Mayor Thorp opened the Public Hearing for Item No. 22 at 10:52 p.m. • Staff Presentation
Deputy Director of Community Development/City Planner Matlock asked that the public hearing be continued to the June 9, 2025 City Council meeting.

City Council Minutes Page 10 of 13
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
969

ACTION: MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM VENABLE, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER BEAVER, CARRIED 5-0, TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO THE JUNE 9, 2025 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

23. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 454 - ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF SECTION

16.0226 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE (SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR

SERVICES) REGARDING FIREARMS STORAGE
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Approve the introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 454 - an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, California, adopting by reference Section 16.0226 of Chapter 2 of Division 6 of Title 1 of the San Bernardino County Code to establish a schedule of fees for firearms storage and other Sheriff s Department services rendered within the City; and

2. Direct the City Clerk to publish the required notice and schedule a duly noticed public hearing for second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 454 at the next regular City Council meeting.
• Public Hearing Opened
Mayor Thorp opened the Public Hearing for Item No. 23 at 10:53 p.m. • Staff Presentation
Public Safety Manager Benson presented the Agenda Report. • Applicant Presentation
There was no presentation.
• Public Comments
There were no public comments.
• Applicant Rebuttal
There was no rebuttal.
• Public Hearing Closed
Mayor Thorp closed the Public Hearing at 10:55 p.m.

ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER BEAVER, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM VENABLE, CARRIED 5-0, TO APPROVE THE INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 454, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE SECTION 16.0226 OF CHAPTER 2 OF DIVISION 6 OF TITLE 1

OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE TO ESTABLISH A SCHEDULE

OF FEES FOR FIREARMS STORAGE AND OTHER SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT SERVICES RENDERED WITHIN THE CITY.

City Council Minutes Page 11 of 13
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
970

24. SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON STAFFING VACANCIES TO COMPLY WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 2561
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council hold a public hearing in accordance with the requirements of Assembly Bill 2561.

Public Hearing Opened
Mayor Thorp opened the Public Hearing for Item No. 24 at 10:56 p.m. • Staff Presentation
Director of Finance White presented the Agenda Report.
• Applicant Presentation
There was no presentation.
• Public Comments
There were no public comments.
• Applicant Rebuttal
There was no rebuttal.
• Public Hearing Closed
Mayor Thorp closed the Public Hearing at 10:57 p.m.

ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER BEAVER, CARRIED 5-0, TO RECEIVE THE REPORT IN COMPLIANCE WITH AB 2561.

COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS/REPORTS
Councilmember Woolsey attended the Southern California Association of Governments Annual Conference along with Councilmember Miller and the City/County Conference along with Councilmember Miller and Interim City Manager Crawford.

Councilmember Miller attended the County's Emergency Operations training for executives and elected officials.

Mayor Pro Tem Venable announced the date for the upcoming Lecture Series on May 17, 2025.

He recognized Director of Community Services Megan Wolfe on a successful Music & Arts Festival. Lastly, he announced the dates for the upcoming Rodeo and the Bike Rodeo.

Mayor Thorp thanked all those in attendance at the Music & Arts Festival and Love Yucaipa.

City Council Minutes Page 12 of 13
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
971

ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no additional announcements.

ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 11:02 p.m.

ATTES
Ana V. ause. MC
Director o General Services/City Clerk
City Council Minutes Page 13 of 13
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
972

ATTACHMENT 13
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
973

Draft Environmental Impact Report
EIR Link: FCSP Draft SEIR
Appendices accessible here: City's Environmental Review Page 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
974

ATTACHMENT 14
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
975

Final Environmental Impact Report
FSEIR Link: https://vucaipa.gov/wp-content/uploads/dev Svcs/EIR/FCSP/7-31- 2025%20Drafts/Revised Fina1SEIR FINAL OPT.pdf? t=1754002013 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
976

ATTACHMENT 15
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
977

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MMRP Link: https://vucaipa.gov/wp-content/uploads/dev svcs/EIR/FCSP/7-31- 2025%20Drafts/MMRP FCSP.pdf? t=1754002017
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
978

ATTACHMENT 16
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
979

Finding of Fact
Finding of Fact Link: https://vucaipa.gov/wp-
content/uploads/dev svcs/EIR/FCSP/COY-08.0 FOFSOC.pdf
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
980

ATTACHMENT 17
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
981

RGA
Office of Architectural Design
15231 Alton Parkway, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
8841 RESEARCH DR
SUITE 200
IRVINE • CA 92618
949.387.1323
RIDGELA.COM

PACIFIC OAKS

COMMERCE CENTER
0 60 120 240
360

PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
9/13/2023
1/14/2022
MARK
11/17/2021
DATE

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

DRAFT SCHEMATIC DESIGN

DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-2A2-1
DRAWN BY:

RLA
CHK'D BY:

RLA
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
SHEET TITLE:
1 0 0
0 /2 /20 5 i ounci1 Q nda
J:\Dwgs2lGA\vaciic Oaks\1-SD\po-plp.dwg, 9/13/2023 3:34:15 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 982

1 •

PROJECT INFORMATION
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
0301-211-10, 12
0301-221-10
0301-201-26
0301-191-21
i

22.7-1
1 1
1 VICINITY MAP
1 1
6'H TRASH

ENCLOSURE
111111111
i
J
8'H TUBE STEEL FENCE
r
•
_ _ _ _ _ NEW LOT LINE
•
•
•

DUNLAP ACRES
Kentucky St
S
0 A©O
•
Fairmont St
Yucape c,
Tayss Dr
Kelly I n
O9
Curarapo sr
Car�meav 8r�
SITE
W rovrlty Line LP
eo
ve
Thrrrp L%'By
W AreL
Eureka St
Noreen Ln
Colorado St
Fairview Dr
Clark LN
Woody Ln
n
s m
A enue G
W Ave L
Nr4s��
W ILI7WO
CANVO

0. Manas
monvei
Clark e'a
Diner
Avon
•
•
12'X55' TRAILER STALLS
BUILDING 1
•
,052,500 S
78 DOCK POSITION
10 TRAILER STALL
•
515 AUTO STALLS
CONST. TYPE III-B

ESFR SPRINKLERS
MAX. HEIGHT: 62 FT.

SECONDARY

FIRE ACCESS

DRIVE (SEE CIVIL)
•
•
12'X55' TRAILE
8'H TUBE STEEL FENCE
•
•
•
•
uJ
CD
'--8'H TUBE

STEEL FENCE
111111111
1 1l D 2 40'

57.4'
•
•
•
•
i
-
•
•
•
•
OcD
6'H TRASH

ENCLOSURE
•
•
•
•
/g\
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE:

PROPOSED MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:

PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION TYPE:

PROPOSED USE:

PROJECT DATA
62'
S-1
(WAREHOUSE / LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)

SITE AREA

BUILDING AREA

COVERAGE

BUILDING AREA BY USE
OFFICE

WAREHOUSE

AUTO PARKING

REQUIRED PARKING
OFFICE

WAREHOUSE

TOTAL REQUIRED

PARKING PROVIDED

STANDARD STALLS

ADA STALLS

EV STALLS

TOTAL PROVIDED

DOCK LOADING ZONES

REQUIRED

PROVIDED

TRAILER PARKING

PROVIDED
BUILDING 1
2,625,382 SF

60.270 AC
1,052,500 SF

40.09%
20,000 SF
1,032,500 SF
80 1,033
1,113
453
11 52
515
4 178
410
BUILDING 2
2,838,221 SF

65.157 AC
1,001,500 SF

35.29%
20,000 SF
981,500 SF
80 982
1,062
418
10 48
475
4 178
326
TOTAL
5,463,603 SF
125.427 AC
2,054,000 SF
40,000 SF
2,014,000 SF
160
2,014
2,174
870
21 99
990
8 356
736
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
ARCHITECT:

RGA
Office of Architectural Design
15231 Alton Parkway, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
APPLICANT:

PACIFIC

INDUSTRIAL
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
EMAIL:

PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

YUCAIPA, CA

SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN
1/14/22
11/19/21
DATE
2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL

PLANNING SUBMITTAL SET

DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-A1-1P
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
Al
0 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
983

1 50'
1 r

2. 7
1 40
r
8'H TUBE STEEL FENCE
r

NEW LOT LINE
81H TUBE STEEL FENCE
\
co
S)
40 LLJ
L
O
N
co
h-1uL)uuu
u u u
u u
12'X55' TRAILER STALLS
LLJ
8'H TUBE

STEEL FENCE
O
1,544'
co
of
\
O
co
140
N ;
22'
40'

57.4'
19'26'19
1926' 19' 12'
6'H TRASH

ENCLOSURE
i
I
17777
e I
® I
V//
12'
19'26' 19
19' 2
0 BUILDING
1,052,500
178 DOCK POSITIO
410 TRAILER STAL
o15 AUTO STALL;
CONST. TYPE III-B

ESFR SPRINKLERS
MAX. HEIGHT: 62 FT.

IS
S
FE
- ;OFFICE
in
N
Co
•
•
N
•
0 N
r,r,r,r,r, ^r,',,,r,r,
rn r--1 , r, r•-t,H
L
•
N
•
•
E
N__
1 12'X55' TRAILER STALLS
OFFICE
I la
•
•
co

SECONDARY
8'H TUBE STEEL FENCE

FIRE ACCESS

DRIVE (SEE CIVIL)
M
r)
O
SCALE: 1" = 80'-0"
ARCHITECT:

RGA
Office of Architectural Design
15231 Alton Parkway, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
APPLICANT:

PACIFIC

INDUSTRIAL
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
EMAIL:

PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

YUCAIPA, CA
SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN - BUILDING 1
SD
SD
MARK
1/14/22
2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL
11/19/21

PLANNING SUBMITTAL SET
DATE

DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-A1-1P
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
Al
1 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
984

BUILDING 1
SEE SHT. A1-1
•
•
F
T
N
•
•
N
•
•
N
•
•
--
•
•
•
•
•
X
X
S
178- SOCK POSITIONS
326 TRAILER -STALLS;
5 AUTO STALLS
CONST. TYPE III-B

SFR'SPRINIKLERRS
X. H IGHT'. F .
6'H TRASH

ENCLOSURE
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
A
X
i
X
X
X
X
/
•
•
ARCHITECT:

RGA
Office of Architectural Design
15231 Alton Parkway, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
APPLICANT:

PACIFIC

INDUSTRIAL
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
EMAIL:

PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

YUCAIPA, CA
SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN - BUILDING 2
SD
SD
MARK
1/14/22
2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL
11/19/21

PLANNING SUBMITTAL SET
DATE

DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-A1-1P
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
Al
2 08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
985

1 542'-F
a
2 Q
� �
u uuuuuu� uuuuuuu�
uuuuuuu� uuuuuuu� uuuuuuu�
00000uu�
uuuuuuu�
uuuuuuu� uuuuuuu�
uuuuuuu� uuuuuuu�
o000000
uuuuuuu�
uuuuuuu
N uuuu
` `
-
Lf)
1 LC)
m
CoCo
m
(NJ
Co
N
ti
c
ao
N
Eo
N
E
Op
0,-)
co
o

BUILDING
1 0
,)
N
N
CO
1,052,500SF

OCCUPANCY
S-1
H
i
N
i
'
CONST

TYPE III-B
\
En
o
\
ESFR
MAX.

SPRINKLERS
HEIGHT: 62
FT.
o
\
a
E
N
N
ti
1`
ao
N
Co
N
Co
(0
Co
(0
6)
67 Eo
Li)
asp
LC)
Co
,
r
,-
Co
♦
-r
1-1 r-, r-, r-,
r-, r-, 1 1
1—I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r-, r-, r-, r-, r-, 1 1
1—I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I —I r-, r-, r-, 1 1 rZr1
r-, r-, r-, r-, 1 1 r1 1 1 r mr-1 r-, i p
r1 r-, r-, r-1 1 1 1 1 I-1 r-, r-, r-,
r-, r-, I-1 1—I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I-1 1—I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I-1 1-1 �♦
1 J J J J J J 'J J J 'J
1 1
�\
`''
~�
NTIRY ;
OFFICE
— — — — — — — — — —
OFFICE ~ ENTRYI-
3 `o
E.♦
I� 1
I Jr
�\
L
J 1_
1-7-1J
548'
12'
119'
1,176'
119'
12'
48' 5'
ii i i
i o i
1,544'
i
i i
I
SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" 0' 50' 100' 200'
ARCHITECT:

RGA
Office of Architectural Design
15231 Alton Parkway, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
APPLICANT:

PACIFIC

INDUSTRIAL
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
EMAIL:

PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

YUCAIPA, CA
SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 1
SD
MARK
11/19/21

PLANNING SUBMITTAL SET
DATE

DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-1A2-1
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
A2 1 1
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
986

i
5' 48'
L12'
65'
1,346'
ii
Co
1 �;
1 _ MAIN _
ENTRY
1 I
OFFICE
C
a
. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
h

I LJ LJ

LJ LJ LJ LJ
LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ I n

I LJ LJ LJ

LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ
"LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ 1 1 1 I
n I LJ LJ LJ 1 1 IJ LJ LJ ME L_
LJ 1 1 LJ
LJ LJ LJ LJ 1 1 LJ LJ LJ

LJ LJ LJ LJ

LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ

LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ
_.
,._
CCD
()
L
J
_I _I _I
_I _I
_I _I
_I _I
Eo
Lo
o)
co
co
Fpo
C
0o
N
0)
co
o
co

BUILDING
2 -c-Ni
r,
N
\
1,001,500SF

OCCUPANCY
S-1
N
L J

CONST TYPE
III-B
o

ESFR SPRINKLERS
MAX. HEIGHT:
62 FT.
0)
N
cm
-60
c
Ec
N
c)
ED
Lf)
r-1 r-1 r1 r-1 r-1 r-1
r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 rrrI
r-1 r-1 r-1
r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1
r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-i rrrI
1-7 1-1 1 1 1-7 1-7 r—i 1-7 1-7 r—
1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7
1-7 1-7 1--1 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7
1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7
1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7
1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7
1N
J J J J J J �
Co
Ir
_MAIN _ -
ENTRY
1 OFFICE
a
Q
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .
\
L J
5' 48'
12'
65'
1,346'
//
1,476'
SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" 0' 10' 20' 50'
Al1
100'
ARCHITECT:

RGA
Office of Architectural Design
15231 Alton Parkway, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
APPLICANT:

PACIFIC

INDUSTRIAL
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
EMAIL:

PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

YUCAIPA, CA
SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 2
SD
MARK
11/19/21

PLANNING SUBMITTAL SET
DATE

DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-1A2-1
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
A2 1 2
08/25/2025 City Council Agenda
987

08/

VICINITY MAP
1-70 rem,
SITE
WW1
Lha RD-

VICINITY MAP
NTS

EXISTING BUILDING
78 LF FROM PL
•
LAND USE:

SINGLE RESIDENTIAL
C25
LAND USE:

OPEN SPACE
•
LAND USE:

GENERAL COMMERCIAL
LAND USE:

MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL
/
/

EXISTING BUILDING
12 LF FROM PL
L12
!i!
+ ›/ - ) ± ,±\ ± \\L\kc\r*
4%•i _ s �- �L1 + +'ter-. i + H\\111 +r I
O .6/, yrorzo...4-.
_ ..:..iT / - -r . +, --J1/ +J +/
+ PARCEL 1
YB -:
y11 /�L'\ +; \\+ ) FUTURE ROAD ACCESS :Avo\
/ : / / / + /+'/ (NOT A PART OF PROJECT - ROAD \
/ / + +/+ 4 DESIGN SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING y\
sA\i UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WITH +
- "� 16 '-/ FURTHER CITY APPROVAL REQUIRED.
///
+ • +� +� / J_? T �}�.+ ✓ �` ii F ,fir +
+ C29 ''+ +
�' C24 \ _L19 '�--y,-
L18 + + _+-- �- r
-h.....'...'
—L26—
C26 j � + + + C27 ' _
'
II�L38 \\`_�i\
_ PROPOSED
LAND USE:

GENERAL COMMERCIAL

EXISTING BUILDING
115 LF FROM PL
9 L79'
�II �I
+ + t
- 7 —
/ /
▪ >�� / �V l��`�\�- �c -_"��^`� ��� \_Ill(��/l'i\\\��\ ,/ )\\\I��\l\�`� / EXIS:1::SITE\���s�\�\,\\ ?'/i_ 1/ OEACE - . \�`�� ��\�1: \ 11' \'1\`� +f-+) / )1\��\�� `, \� // \ � ,,/` PUBLIC ROAD FUTURE ,�, Th
_ /\����\l1` ��/� ALIGNMENT PENDING I\ °-0=�-_��
-- -N
l 1\� `�� �'f CITY COORDINATION �,.
(i 222u205J//� z+ + J
E / /\
i )N\n\ r ___'''''_
ll lid(
(▪ f \� 2` / l 7 -off

40.0'+ ��i ! 35,�i \ _ � �7_ , \ �1 l ' ��c�$ �j• //ice �� //j I - � ��� ;A�;� 20'�ti �-� \ + � �' VP
-'l/ l l ( '
R20' ;N I I / 7.: / ( i
0",..
2 TYP. (I+\ +/ / \ )) / /
20 TRASH ENCLOSURE \ I 1
� r.C.N4‘.,1\)1+ .11!) '-:j+j:-21 /// cr(i3.) i) i / 4/7_,,--\\ ( / 1 ,�/ + �%� _ °aa\\\\���� .2205.� '4`i:� ,l01/(i�L1/N1)7U>;-SE :

OPEN SPACE
LAND USE:

SINGLE FAMILY
�� 4 TYP.
)`)Mk` 41/4-7
20 011111i , 2: 7
178 DOCK POSITIONS
326 TRAILER STALLS
1,001,500 SF
BUILDING 2
.00

0. PARKING
(SEE PARCEL DESCRIPTION NOTE)
471 AUTO STALLS

SPRINKLER
MAX HEIGHT 62 FT

CONSTRUCTION TYPE III-B

LINE TABLE

LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING
‘,X) V\----::--,:::),,,,,\))5\
----.L. : • lj
‘-.\ --1;:\ -E--:--;----X I-sz:T-I4-7:1:‘:____/';----S I,- TIE)\1;\;\\:\t:_r1:2-11:(1/Tic-1//-:/2,14-2)1:-//7/11;0j:_;tr---1\-)\-k\\\)()\-\\\\-(f 1 :**;A::'.71c4c4'''cf,c1jjf(j11(::r/i !1:7;:-\ :;Aff 7\//, / ----"\j))///r---()(--c,/---\\L/17,00/)-\)101}1 c)' \ ' 1 (± q,-/j--i ?////// i) it_;\,,)-_- \ 0 „__ J, \ /// 1,:(;,!/..(</)
-----------------
•
\\ \t‘\\\N\\ ;\
PARCEL DESCRIPTION Ns(A!1-74-4.li

OPEN SPACE
PARCEL 7

WAREHOUSE
PARCEL 2 = 32.04 AC. (GROSS)
PARCEL 6* = 29.68 AC. (GROSS)
TOTAL AREA = 312.91 AC. (GROSS)
*CONDITIONED TO REQUIRE PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBLE IMPROVEMENTS IF UTILIZED BY BUILDING 2 (PARCEL

BUILDING SETBACKS
PROPOSED: IB ZONE
FRONT SETBACK: 15'
REAR AND SIDE SETBACK: 10'

ACCESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS
0301-201-40, —41 & —42, 031-211-10 & —12,
0301-201-26, 0301-191-21

PROPOSED SITE BREAKDOWN
LANDSCAPE: 68%
PAVED: 17%
BUILDING: 15%

EXISTING EASEMENTS
12 16
23 SLOPE EASEMENT TO YUCAIPA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT PER RECORDING NO. 81-107293

SLOPE EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PER
RECORDING NO. 89-426317
ACCESS EASEMENT PER RECORDING NO. 2018-0448807

LAND USE
EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT
PROPOSED LAND USE: WAREHOUSE / FUTURE RESIDENTIAL

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
EXISTING LAND USE: OPEN SPACE / SINGLE RESIDENTIAL / MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED LAND USE: OPEN SPACE / BUSINESS PARK / MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL 7)
z ililY.771/r/(1///471r-

PROJECT DATA

LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING
L78
214.92
S5215'03.88"E

LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING

SITE AREA

BUILDING AREA

COVERAGE

BUIDING AREA BY USE
OFFICE

VVAREHOUSE

AUTO PARKING
REDUIRED PARKING.

OFFICE

WAREHOUSE

TOTAL REQUIRED
BUILDING 1
2,625.352 SF

60.270 AC
1,062,500 SF

20.000 SF
1,032.500 SF

PARKING PROVIDED

STANDARD STALLS

ADA STALLS

EV STALLS

TOTAL PROVIDED

1.113
TOTAL
5,4n.13{13 SF
125.42T AC_.
1,001,500 SF
20,000 SF 40,000 SF
961,500 SF 2r014.000 SF
80 160
982 2,014
452
11 DOCK LOADING ZONES

REQUIRED

PROVIDED
.515
413
10 48
866
471 986

TRAILER PARKING

PROVIDED
118
13 LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING

CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
DELTA

CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
DELTA

LAND OWNER

PALMER GENERAL CORPORATION
32335 LIVE OAK CANYON RD
REDLANDS, CA 92373
(909)-534-6958

APPLICANT

PI DEVELOPMENT, LLC
6272 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, STE E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
(714) 717-7843

SURVEYOR
PBLA SURVEYING, INC.

REDLANDS, CA 92373
(888) 714-9672

CIVIL ENGINEER

JACOB GLAZE
KIMLEY—HORN
1100 W TOWN AND COUNTRY, SUITE 700
ORANGE, CA 92868
(714) 705-1374
R G A
n
,
,
R A
0 A
0 R
\
R
•
,
,
,
,
,
0 ,,
.
fEss,o,
,,, s. ,,,
4,,,_
c 87934
ii. CivIk,
ri
7'
*
Klmley)))
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
FX 949-341-0922
orn
noo w. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
CO\
Ch
PIL
AL
v,,cA
OVh
pA
HALL
C A
SIT-
PLA\
M
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SCALE: 1" = 200'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
S /
(., 0
988

08/
GRAD
\> 0\ S
+ +
+ + + + + + -' +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + +
\ - + +
/i
LEGEND
/
0 //
I} 11
11 II
II
/ O
-r + + + + + + +
i �// i `\`\ + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1pf":17-"_--%:-
+ + + + + r + + + + + + + + + + + + +
OO/ : ' + + + + + + + + + + I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
r + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + +I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -hi fv+ + + + + + + +j + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + f + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + � + + + + / + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + II + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + f/+ + 7—+ —7- 7—+ — i—r .4—_+ — - _.__+ + + + + + + + + + + + `' + + + + fj + + + + + + + + + + + �+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + � + + + + + + + % -- + + + + + $- �
+� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I + + +
+ + + __ + + + + l--- + + + -- + + + + + �/ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + / +---- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I + + +
1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + -�+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
I
+ + + + + + + + + +/+ + + + + + + +
+++ ++ + ++++ ++++++++S CRAD\C P A\+++++f++ ++++++ +++++ + ...----F__i___ +.___A + + + + + + + + + +
I-1-T G2.0
\G PLA\
++++++
+ + + + + + + + i + + + + + + +� + + + + 1 1 + + + 1 + - + -�++++++�, ++++++ +`++++++ + + +
/ + + + + + + + + ++ + + + L + + + + + + +` \ + + + + + + + -L + + + + + + / + + + 0 \+ ++ +++++�++++ + +
v + + + + + + + + + + I+ + + + + +� + + + + + + + + +� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ + + + + + + + + +� + 1+ + +
+ + + + + + - + + + + + + \ + + + + + + + + +� + + +
+ + + + + + + 11-1-17_11111-
+ + + + +� + ++ + + +� + +
:: + +
+ + + + + + + + +
=%/ + + + + + + + + + + -
+ + + + + + + + + +
+__-+___f + + + + + + + + +
--________________ + + + + + + + + +"•-•
+ + + + + +
.. + + + + + +
/ '' + + + + + + + +
•
"1.

PROPERTY LINE

EASEMENT LINE

STREET CENTERLINE

SECTION OUTLINE

TERRIS DRAIN

PAVEMENT

HYDROSEED

LANDSCAPING
+ + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + +
+ +
+ + + +
+ + + + +
+ + + + +
+ H

JIIIIIIIII
1 S- h GRAD
0\ S
\7 PLA\
G4.0
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + +
-r + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + +
+ + + + +
Hil
SH- GRAD \C PLA\
0\ S T C50
+""-
+ + + + + +
+ + +
•
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
T � \\
\\\ \\ + + + + + + + + + + + +
•
+
e
+ + + + + +
+ r + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + T
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + I
+
+
+

SH- GRAD
0\ S
SH- GRAD \G PLA\
0\ S T G6.0
. + + + + ♦\ --'+ - + + + +
\G PLA\
G5.0
+ + +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+
SH- GRAD \C PLA\
ON S G/.0
+ +
+ + + + +
+ + +
+
H , A
,
,
,
,
p A
0 A
\
R
■
�/
�/
�/
.
�oFs ss i c A� F
��o_A., ti

4.),
,_„.

C
*� _8
\nT
9i.F o \Fo�`�
F CAL
A
Q
Kimiey*
_0 _
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
or no
© 2021 KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1100 W. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
CO\CI-
PM
AL
GRAD
„,
C A
P
\
A C A
9 G OM-
HALL
PLA\
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION
^^^

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 100 200 400
SCALE: 1" = 200'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
CO.0
989

08/
i
-17
(
J
7 7
1996.48 TC
/1996,.15 LIP
\1995.98
1996.15 LIP
1996.52 FS
zz
POLE
1998.21 FS
1998.19 TC
% / i
71,
2050.00-FS
7 7
/ 7 7
�77�
/ -7 7 N
/ \\
/
/ ///
// //
// //�
2/ //
// //
// (
/
/ </ //7
/ /// /7 / - _ ` ` -/..'_....
/ 7 �
/� _ / _
//l�I / //i ---- --y/ \\
I / / / -- --� - _ ___
/ / /, 0, / / .'
/ / /2049.12 FS
// r// //
/ /Y/
/
/ / /// /)/
/ // /// / / ////
/ // //// �/ // /
/ / / / //// //
�//////
/// /// / //
/ // //
/
/// / / // /
i/
2100.00 FS
-2019.90-FS
2019.87 TC
2100.00-FS
7 \ i i
�I
2150.00'FS' /
2019.37:FL
2035.53 LIP_zz - - - 2035 Zp4p'
i72019.93 HP.
�� z7'2019.87TC' 2050� ----- �2035.61"FL / / ��2040.90FS�_��/,�----_ �' // " �i \ -`i�/ �2019.37FL- c, ------�/,/ / �2035.77LIP �\��--J// /�l �l .11 ,�� -\\�- �� \\ %- �? /i--- .�- ///,/�� 7 /
2200.00-FS-
2036.14;FS
-2036.11-TC
203577 LIP
2-2036.17 HP-
- 2036.11 TC
7 / 7 _ �' -
// 2200_OO-FS
2100.00_FS
2050.00 FS
1 2097.25 FS
2040.90 FS
,2040.37 FL
--2040.53 LIP
/
2150.00;FS/
i
2250.00 FS
2150.00
FS
/2052.79 FS
2052.77 TC
\12052.27 FL
2052.44 LIP
2052.79 FS
2097.25 FS
07 /
/
N.
/
L-
-10
/
-
LEGEND
2166
GB
TR
TW
TC
FS
TS
BS
HP
(2166.50 TC)
2166.50 TC
X.X%

PROPERTY LINE

EASEMENT LINE

STREET CENTERLINE

PROPOSED CONTOURS

EXISTING CONTOURS

PROPOSED GRADE BREAK

PROPOSED RIDGE

DAYLIGHT LINE

TOP OF RAMP

TOP OF WALL

TOP OF CURB

FINISHED SURFACE

TOP OF STAIRS

BOTTOM OF STAIRS

HIGH POINT

EXISTING GRADE

PROPOSED GRADE

TERRIS DRAIN

PAVEMENT

HYDROSEED

LANDSCAPING

PROPOSED SLOPE
,0,Ess,„.

H
G A
n
n
n
P A
0 A
S
0 \
R
•
,,,,, s. 0,5,,
, ,,,

0...

Kimley*
__, __, __, __,
.,
c,_,
,,
,..„4.
*
_.:,
,i.
,,,,
C 87934
/ Civ\V-
rn
m
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
orn
no° W. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
CO\Cl-
DM__},AL
GRAD
v„,cA
\
G
pA
A\D
CA
DRA
\AGI-
_)LA\
1 M
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION
___.._ ... ,

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 30 60 120
SCALE: 1" = 60'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
__)
<.,
0 990