Item 24 - Resolution Establishing Speed Limits within the City of Yucaipa

Item No. 24

STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 27, 2026
TO:

FROM:

PREPARED BY:

SUBJECT:

Honorable Mayor and Cif
Dr. Sean M. Moore, City
Fermin Preciado, Director of Devefopment Services/City Engineer Landon Kern, Assistant Engineer
Resolution Establishing Speed Limits within the City of Yucaipa RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-29, establishing speed limits upon certain streets and segments of streets within the City of Yucaipa; or

2. Provide further direction to staff.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The speed limits in California have been established and governed based on actual traffic data collected as required by the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802. This requires cities and other local agencies to conduct engineering and traffic surveys (speed survey) for speed limits on public arterial and collector street segments once every five years. The speed survey may be conducted every seven years under certain circumstances where police officers have met specific speed detection equipment training requirements since speed limits may be enforced through the use of Radar (radio waves) or LiDAR (laser).

The most recent citywide speed survey was completed in 2023, which included analysis of the speed limits previously established and adopted by the City Council in 2018 for 94 street segments and 6 additional segments identified by staff to be added into the analysis. The results of the 2023 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits (2023 Speed Survey) were presented at the January 22, 2024, City Council meeting. At that time the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-01 establishing the speed limit for 100 street segments in the City of Yucaipa. Of these 100 street segments analyzed in 2023, speed limits were adjusted for 3 segments. With the requirement to conduct the citywide speed survey every 5 years, another speed survey will need to be completed in 2028.

In the City of Yucaipa, residential (local) streets, school zone streets and streets in the Uptown Yucaipa business area have historically been exempt from these requirements to establish speed

limits, as speed limits are established by the CVC at 25 mph. However, recent legislative actions, including AB382 and AB1014 have expanded local authority to prioritize safety outcomes under certain conditions. AB382 allows local agencies to adopt resolutions to reduce school zone street segment speed limits from 25mph to 20mph to enhance safety for pedestrians, bicyclists and other road users. AB 1014 provides additional flexibility for local agencies to reduce speed limits up to 5 mph below the data driven analysis speed limit recommendation, if streets and conditions meet certain criteria.

This new legislative framework provides cities flexibility to consider adjustments to the speed limits recommended by the results of a traffic engineering analysis.

Since the 2023 Speed Survey, both development projects and the City have completed several street widening and street improvement projects that have changed the conditions of the roadway and in some cases the roadway geometry along many of the street segments evaluated by that survey. In addition, over the last several years, the City has received feedback from the public regarding speeding and other traffic safety related concerns through the City's Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program.

With the new tools and flexibility provided by the new legislation, staff selected 11 street segments to be further analyzed in 2026 to determine if speed limit changes would be warranted. The 11 street segments were selected based on changes in conditions to the street segments and from the input received from the public related to speeding concerns.

The City's on -call traffic engineering consultant, Minagar & Associates, Inc. (Minagar) completed the 2023 Speed Survey. Due to their familiarity with the City's street network and speed limits, staff requested a cost proposal from Minegar to prepare the analysis for the 11 street segments and 36 street segments within designated school zones. Their knowledge of the City's street network and previous traffic engineering work for the City would provide for the lowest cost to the City for this effort.

In April of 2026, staff administratively approved a contract with Minagar in the not -to -exceed amount of $27,779 for this effort. The cost of the analysis related to the school zones was in the amount of $17, 934 and the cost for the analysis of the 11 street segments was in the amount of $9,845.

Minagar completed the collection of the speed data while school was in session to ensure that the analysis considered school related traffic. The work has been completed and both the `Technical Memorandum for School Zone Speeds Under AB382' and the `2026 Citywide Engineering & Traffic Survey Update for Selected (11) Roadway Segments' have been prepared and attached to this report for reference. The following table summarizes the results of the analysis and are the basis of the proposed recommendations:

Street
Segment
Street Name
Segment Limits
Existing
Speed Limit
Proposed
Speed Limit
Number
1 Bryant Street
Date Avenue to
45 mph
40 mph
Yucaipa Boulevard
2 Oak Glen Road
Bryant Street to
50 mph
45mph
Cherry Croft Drive
3 Oak Glen Road
Cherry Croft Drive to
50 mph
50 mph
City Limits
4 Wildwood Canyon Road
Bryant Street to
45 mph
40 mph
Holmes Street
5 Wildwood Canyon Road
Mesa Grande Drive to
45 mph
45 mph
Oak Mesa Drive
6 Wildwood Canyon Road
Oak Mesa Drive to
45 mph
45 mph
Oak Glen Road
7 13th Street
Avenue E to
35 mph
35 mph
Oak Glen Road
8 Avenue E
Yucaipa Boulevard to
35 mph
35 mph
16th Street
9 Colorado Street
Wildwood Canyon Road to
35 mph
35 mph
8th Street
10 Colorado Street
8th Street to
35 mph
35 mph
9th Street
11 Colorado Street
9th Street to
35 mph
35 mph
1 Oth Street
20 mph
School Zone Street
proposed
-
Segments
Various Locations
Varies
for 16 of 40
(40 Segments)
segments
1) No changes proposed to speed limit. Analysis recommends additional speed limit signage to increase driver awareness and support enforcement.
2) Details of speed limit recommendations for school zone streets are included in Technical Memorandum for School Zone Speeds Under AB382 (Attachment 2).

Based on the recommendations provided by the traffic engineer and following the requirements in the CVC, staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 2026-29 establishing speed limits upon certain streets and segments of streets in the City of Yucaipa.

Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-29 will help achieve the following:
1) Support the adopted 2026 City Council Goal No. 6 to "Ensure Public Safety has the necessary tools and resources"
2) Enhance safety along key transportation corridors and in school zones by facilitating traffic enforcement, reducing vehicle speeds and reducing the number of speed related traffic collisions

FISCAL IMPACT:

The cost to implement the proposed recommendations are included in the Proposed FY26/27 Budget.

Attachments:

1. Resolution No. 2026-29

2. Technical Memorandum for School Zone Speeds Under AB382

3. 2026 Citywide Engineering & Traffic Survey Update for Selected (11) Roadway Segments

ATTACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION NO.2026-29

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA

ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN STREETS AND

SEGMENTS OF CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA
WHEREAS, an Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits is required to establish speed limits on certain City streets and where speed enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic speed measuring device; and
WHEREAS, an Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits was performed in June of 2026, in accordance with the requirements of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code authorizes the City, by ordinance or resolution, to determine and declare a prima facie speed of limit 20 or 25 miles per hour.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The above recitals are all true and correct.

Section 2. The City Council hereby adopts and establishes the speed limits based on the 2026 Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey Update — Phase II for Selected Roadway Segments and Technical Memorandum 2026 School Zone Speeds Under New California AB 382 (Phase 1) to allow for enforcement of these speed limits using radar or other electronic device in conformance with the requirements of the State of California.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 27"' day of July, 2026.

Chris Venable, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ana Sauseda
Director of General Services/City Clerk

ATTACHMENT 2

Technical Memorandum
SCHOOL

5.„EEC LIM TD 2026 School Zone Speeds
�Zo 20 Under New California AB 382
MREN (Phase 1)

CHILDREN
ARE Pfl ESENI
City of Yucaipa, CA
Proposed School Zone Speed Limit
25 MPH

IVY AVE
School Location
City Limits 1
PK VIED: LI DfIE S:;H Ci CARTER ST

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

UNINCORPORATED
:='WET,TNEEDGECRAFTERI--EE'A+ ?
ti FIR AVE
. :41PA NIGH SC HK,Rx
Ir =
-K
'_ AK VIEV: H!(.H SCNOOI
=
D1;NLAF EL EIAEh TARPS_µ^�L `�
m
•� ELEME1 T RV SCHC 0HAPM\ OAK GLEN RD
yZOCSyy CAMPUS 1 lA�HEKsHTS RO-A p 6� g \ RIDGEYIEY: ELBA ENTARV COLLEGE CLLEGE 1 DATE AVE
�
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTti

UNINCORPORATED
7ENNE5 SEE 5T 1- r H- F. o Y c l
`^ YUCAIPA BLVD INLAND LEADEkS CHARTER SCHA^,tt
1 �
AVE E
--� FAITN LUTFeE RA.N PRE 3CM'.IOL
O AVEV
KENT

UNLAP OLVD AVF F
U CKYIbT� ® r ¢ e O 6
�~ O s i
VALLE�EL'c GENTARV S� NOCL ' ry _
�J �oLORAoo sti a m $ �

BELLA VISTA D GREEN VALLEY HIGH SCHDDL
? L/M S

WILDWOOD CANYON OR
CITY OF v t%
REDLANDS �E !'
AVE H v
ti LO O
_ SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY w OO C4,V 0A' OR
fRIVERSIDE COUNTY---------------------tr.n-n.._^,I----- --N-N--V----�----------------------------- (` ,/� � � � N I':IL DI•ICOD ELEIAEN TARP S'=FgOt A ...a ^I Z N
C� A
am�m

CALIMESAELEMENTARY SCRCOL - O
8 MESA GRANDE ACADEMv
J
CITY OF YUCAIPA 202G PROPOSED
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Lr«

SCHOOLSPEED LIMITS
UNDER
UNDER AS 382 � ��..•

CITY OF YUCAIPA
Public Works Department
34272 Yucaipa Boulevard
Yucaipa, CA 92399
PREPARED BY:

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Traffic/Civil/Electrical Engineering — ITS — Transportation Planning — CEM 23282 Mill Creek Drive
East Tower, Suite 120
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
Tel: (949)707-1199
Web: www.minagarinc.com
June 11. 2026

CITY OF
y
ITS.
o`P9 aL
a�
4 ..
s
�dneay-6
Zr
July 15, 2026

LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 zo 20 City of Yucaipa
2026 School Zone Speed
Under New California AB
PREPARED FOR:

CITY OF
Limits
382
y0 CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED BY:

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES INC.

Traffic/Civil/Electrical Engineering - ITS - Transportation Planning - CEM July 15, 2026
(01 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
3 SPEED 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 -• LIMIT
o
20 City of Yucaipa

CITY OF

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
2026 School Zone Speed Limits
Under New California AB 382
I, Fred Minagar do hereby certify that this Technical Memorandum for the City of Yucaipa was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing reports of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional Civil Engineer. The study has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC 2026), the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD 2026 [Effective January 18, 2026]), and under the new California Assembly Bill 382 Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of existing traffic conditions identified on City of Yucaipa roadways.

This report and the establishment of the 2026 School Zone Speed Limits apply only to the 100 roadway segments for which corresponding speed limits were established in January 2024, following the ratification of the proposed speed limits by the Yucaipa City Council. r
Fred Minagar, MS, RCE, PE, RSA, Registration No. 53466
Project Manager
,�:GiF SSlehr
hPS50�t
Z
_2:
�•�►:n
+, c
SEAL
cc auF°"�
f0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

L2"'
2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 City of Yucaipa
Introduction
This Technical Memorandum provides a comprehensive review of speed -limit authorities and new speed -related laws in California as of 2026 as it pertains to School Zone Speeds and City of Yucaipa, focusing on:
➢ AB 382: Pedestrian Safety: School Zones: Speed Limits • Signed/Chaptered: October 10, 2025
• Effective Date: January 1, 2026
➢ AB 1014: Traffic Safety: Speed Limits
• Signed/Chaptered: October 3, 2025
• Effective date: January 1, 2026
This Technical Memorandum is intended to support informed policy decisions, ordinance development, engineering and traffic studies, and implementation actions that enhance traffic safety particularly for children, pedestrians, bicyclists, and other vulnerable road users.

Historically, speed limits in California have been governed by the 85th percentile rule, codified primarily in CVC Sections 22357 and 22358, which require that posted speed limits be based on the speed at or below which 85 percent of motorists travel under free -flow conditions. This approach has limited the ability of local jurisdictions to proactively address safety concerns in areas with high pedestrian and bicycle activity.

Recent legislative actions, including AB 382 (2025), and AB 1014 (2025) have expanded local authority to prioritize safety outcomes over strict adherence to the 85th percentile methodology.

New Statutory Framework
AB 382, chaptered in October 2025, revises California's Vehicle Code school -zone speed -limit rules. Key points:
• Default school zone limit:
o Historically, the prima facie school zone speed limit was 25 MPH when children are present near a school.
o Under AB 382, that baseline is being reduced to 20 MPH in school zones. 0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 5

LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 zo.
20 City of Yucaipa
• Two phases of implementation:
o Now through Jan 1, 2031: Local authorities (cities/counties) may choose to adopt a 20-MPH school zone speed limit by ordinance or resolution and must post the appropriate signs for it to be enforceable without need for an E&TS.
o After Jan 1, 2031: The 20-MPH limit becomes the default prima facie school zone speed limit wherever proper signage is present (local vote not required then).

AB 382 — School Zone Speed Limits
Under AB382 the revised law becomes CVC § 22352:
"(b) Twenty miles per hour in a school zone when any of the following apply:
(1) A school speed limit sign with attached beacons states "speed limit 20 when flashing" and the beacons are flashing.
(2) A school speed limit sign states "children are present" and children are present. (3) A school speed limit sign with specific hours, which shall be determined by the local jurisdiction.
(d) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) "School zone" means an area of a highway within 500 feet of school grounds in any direction, unless otherwise posted, marked with appropriate signs giving notice of the area.
(2) (A) "Children are present" means whenever either of the following occurs:
(i) Children are going to or leaving the school.
(ii) School grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign.
(B) "Children are present" does not include children who are separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier."
(Repealed (in Sec. 1) and added by Stats. 2025, Ch. 555, Sec. 2. (AB 382) Effective January 1, 2026.

Operative January 1, 2031, by its own provisions.)
CVC § 22352.5.:
"(a) Notwithstanding Section 22352, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 miles per hour in a school zone. (0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
6 M, 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 Rio
20 City of Yucaipa
(b) For purposes of this section, "school zone" has the same meaning as defined in Section 22352.
(c) This section shall remain in effect until January 1, 2031, and as of that date is repealed."
(Added by Stats. 2025, Ch. 555, Sec. 3. (AB 382) Effective January 1, 2026. Repealed as of January 1, 2031, by its own provisions.)
Additional School Zone Provisions
AB 382 also revised CVC §22358.4 regarding school -zone speed limits. The revised provisions allow local agencies to establish a 15-MPH prima facie speed limit within qualifying school zones under specified roadway and land -use conditions. In addition, school -zone approach areas located between 500 and 1,000 feet from school grounds may be considered for 25-MPH school -zone approach treatments where appropriate signage is installed. These provisions were considered during the review of the roadway segments evaluated in this memorandum.

Legal Authority to Lower Speed Limits (AB 1014 — Traffic Safety:

Speed Limits)
AB 1014 provides targeted speed -limit flexibility on state highways and local roads by allowing a reduction of up to 5 MPH below the otherwise applicable speed limit without re-establishing a full new posted speed limit based on the 85th-percentile rule, when specific safety conditions are met.

Statutory Framework: CVC § 22358.7
CVC § 22358.7:
"(a) If the Department of Transportation or a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the Department of Transportation may or the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either or both of the following reasons:
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. The Department of Transportation or a local authority shall not deem more than one -fifth of their streets as safety corridors.
(2) The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. (0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
7 LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 "-�- 20 20 City of Yucaipa f
(b) (1) As used in this section, "safety corridor" shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In making this determination, the Department of Transportation shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System.
(2) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). In making this determination, the Department of Transportation shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway.
(c) A peace officer shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section."
(Amended by Stats. 2025, Ch. 287, Sec. 3. (AB 1014) Effective January 1, 2026.) AB 1014 is codified in CVC § 22358.7, which establishes two qualifying conditions under subsection (a):

1. Safety Corridors — § 22358.7(a)(1)

2. Land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians — § 22358.7(a)(2)
If either condition is met, the responsible authority may reduce the posted speed limit by up to 5 MPH, subject to signage and approval requirements.

The new CA MUTCD 2026 defines the first term required to do this reduction as:
"CVC § 22358.7(a)(1) — "Safety Corridor" Definition
Standard:
12ai A safety corridor shall be defined as a roadway segment within an overall roadway network where the highest number of serious injury and fatality crashes occur. 12aj One or more crash weighting factors as provided in paragraph 12ak of this section shall be used to prioritize the locations of fatal and serious injury crashes in developing the "Safety Corridor".
(0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 8

MT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 zo
20 City of Yucaipa
12ak Option: The crash weighting factors to prioritize the locations of fatal and serious injury crashes in developing the "Safety Corridor" may include, but are not limited to, the factors included in Table 2B-104(CA).

California MUTCD 2026 Ecilmi Page 304
( ,'Y'V s t.1'JTCD 2023 Ed hon. as amended for use ;n Cal fornia; Table 2B•104(CA). Safety Corridor Factors
Category
Factors
• Crash severity: Fatal Crashes, Serious Injury Crashes • Mode: Pedestrian -bicycle related crashes. vehicle.+other Crash Weighting Factors to
Factors
• Disadvantaged Community Status: MPOrRTPA or locally defined disadvantaged Develop One Shting
atal Injury
community status based on most current version of CalEnviroScreen Safety Corridor
• Vulnerable Populations: Seniors (age 65 and older) and Youth (under age 15) based on the American Community Survey
• School proximity (within 0.25 miles) based on the Califomia School Campus Database • Systemic or Predicted Crashes
Each roadway segment b!ocrc may be converted into - 0.25-mile overlapping or contiguous 'corridor segments to create a consistent unit of measurement and assess the concentration of Crash Density
linear patterns of crashes within a defined distance. The highest scoring (i.e., most fatal and serious injury crashes per mi'e) "comdor'secments within a street need to be identified and an appropriate threshold set to determine safety corridor elicibility.

Maintenance
The jurisdiction may establish a review and re-evaluation frequency for safety corridors.

However, such frequency need not exceed seven years.

As shown in Table 2B-104(CA), roadway segments with concentrations of fatal and serious injury crashes may qualify for consideration as Safety Corridors under the California MUTCD 2026.

The new CA MUTCD 2026 defines the second term required to do this reduction as:
"CVC § 22358.7(a)(2) — "Land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians" definition
Standard:
12at A land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians shall be defined as the portion of the highway where one or more of any of the generators listed in Table 2B-105(CA) are present within a distance of 1320 feet longitudinally of highway, and meets condition specified in paragraph 12au. 12au Crash data demonstrates the highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three -to -five-year.

E0
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 9

F
2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 City of Yucaipa
.3 i'oma MUTCD 2026 Ecatwn
LFHL°!A s MUTCD 2023 Edmon, as anierrded for use n Calformal Table 2B-105(CA). Generators of High Concentrations of Bicyclists or Pedestrians Category
Generator
Land Use
Employment cen!ers
Presence of reta l
Parks. mull -use trans, ana recreal!cnal destinations
Schaolsiun,rr; ;'es
Senior Centers
Cultural areas enteria mrcnt space areas or areas of community s gn lcance Rel:oeus faculties
HealUtir•ed.ca' fac'l t.es
Transit Factors
Transit stops
Transit-Onc;•led Developmenfs.Transit Pric,ily Areas
Presence of Pedestrian�Brcycfs
Infrastructure
S;dewalk presence
Crossa;ilk OreserCe
Bikewaypi
Nearby saral zed irdersect ons on fcursa}I in!ersecicns Presence of m,cromobil:ty devices such as bicycles or scocters DemxcraphicFactors
Presence of vulnerab'e groups. including chi dren, senors, persons';nth disabilities, users o' personal assstive mcbiMy devices.. and ;he rhmcd
MPO!RTPAcrlocally defined djsadvantageccommumtystatus
Presence of s:udenls ia'I levels)
Local Data
heed idenlif:ed in a safety analysis, such as a road safety auc!t or a fenralzed plann:n,, document such as a loch road safety plan
As shown in Table 2B-105(CA), educational facilities, schools, colleges, parks, and other land uses may qualify as generators of high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians for purposes of evaluating roadway segments under AB 1014.

City of Yucaipa 2026 School Zone Speeds
City of Yucaipa 2026 School Zone Speeds for the following forty (40) street segments within school zones and other locations

1. 2"d Street, 3rd Street, and Yucaipa Boulevard - Roadway Segments Adjacent to ILCS YBC Campus
The roadway segments 2"d Street, 3rd Street, and Yucaipa Boulevard are adjacent to and within the vicinity of the ILCS YBC Campus. The Segments reviewed include Segment No. 1 on 2"d Street from Date Avenue to Yucaipa Boulevard, Segment No. 3 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 10

IT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 LIMIT
20 20 City of Yucaipa
on V Street from Date Avenue to Yucaipa Boulevard, and Segment No. 98 on Yucaipa Boulevard from 51h Street to 2nd Street. The Segments studies with their corresponding existing posted speed limits are shown below.

Ir •:c ' t - - i 11 r1 - T"'�` T�f'�-�;-*�`r�"C"r {"'"M"F F Z �',•�:~ ��d'` ry4c_ ..n.e �! J-7
f Al
�o�►.L j'.f. �s s't-''}- til' i 3 1I SPEED -Y. ,r •-....�{{pw�� _ -3_ SPEED t%'�i� _ *�.- a- �'t'•• ,•� �' I LIMIT LIMIT *•.[i
{ ''ram '�''+rt �►�� _ ...1.t _ :'��` s�:�;'�' �`.'-�:31 _ T ;' r`' � _ 114
ILLS YBC Campus7'
.
t r SPEED a*
ryn� a►• y •ram
3 5 — fal+t
7 2"d Street is located adjacent to the eastern side of the ILCS YBC Campus. This roadway currently has a posted speed limit of 30-MPH and consists of two-way roadway. The portion of this roadway near the school is primarily commercial district, while the remaining portion going further west transitions into a residential area.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 1 of 2nd Street from Date Avenue to Yucaipa Boulevard was determined to be 30- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/Commercial and the 85th percentile speed was 36-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

1.1 Recommendations: According to the aforementioned CVC section under the new AB382, roadway segments located within the school -zone limits may be considered for implementation of a 20-MPH school -zone limit. Based on the information gathered, the portion of the 2"d Street between Cedar Avenue and Yucaipa Boulevard appears to fall in within the 500 feet school -zone limits associated with ILCS YBC Campus. According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to erect signage accordingly to establish a 20-MPH school -zone speed limit. The recommendation includes installations of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).
' MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

S�MET 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 ? City of Yucaipa
Roadway portions of 21d Street between Date Avenue and Cedar Avenue appears to function as an approach to the school -zone area

SCHOOL -
within the 500-1000 ft. Therefore, a 25-MPH school- LIMIT sR<<-,(cA) " zone approach treatment may be considered with 20 Assembly appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs,
and supplemental plaques in accordance with the R ®�
California MUTCD. 45
20 •r
3rd Street is located adjacent to the western side of the ILCS YBC Campus. This roadway has a posted speed
limit of 30-MPH and consists of two-way roadway. Similar to 2nd Street, the portion of the roadway nearest the school is primarily commercial district, while the roadway transitions into residential land uses further away from the school.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across the Segment No.3 of V Street from Date Avenue to Yucaipa Boulevard was determined to be 30-MPH, as the adjacent land use was discovered to be Residential/Commercial and the 85th percentile speed was 36-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

1.2 Recommendations: According to the aforementioned SCHOOL CVC section under the new AB382, roadway LIMT sR4-1(CA) segments located within the school -zone limits may be 20 Assembly s considered for implementation of a 20-MPH school- - �*
zone limit. Based on the information received, the 'i< 45 portion of 3rd Street between Cedar Avenue and
Yucaipa Boulevard appears to fall within the school -
zone 500 ft limit associated with the ILCS YBC
Campus. According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to erect signage accordingly to establish a 20-MPH school - zone speed limit. The recommendation includes installations of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Roadway portions of 3rd Street between Date Avenue and Cedar Avenue appears to function as an approach to the school -zone area within the 500-foot to 1000-foot school distance. Therefore, a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment may be considered with appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques in accordance with the California MUTCD.

Yucaipa Boulevard is located adjacent to the southern frontage of the ILCS YBC Campus. The roadway currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH limits and functions as a major east -west corridor serving the surrounding commercial area.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 98 of Yucaipa Boulevard from 5t" Street and 2nd Street was determined to be 35- MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
12 M. 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 120
2,0 City of Yucaipa
MPH, as the adjacent land us was found to be Business/Commercial and the 8511 percentile speed was 40-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

1.3 Recommendations: According to the aforementioned SCHOOL CVC section under the new AB382, roadway LMrr sR4-1ccA> segments located within the school -zone limits may be 20 Assembly C considered for implementation of a 20-MPH school -
zone limit. Based on the information gathered, the
portion of the Yucaipa Boulevard between 3rd Street
and 2"d Street appears to fall in within the 500-foot
school -zone limits associated with ILCS YBC Campus.

According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to erect signage accordingly to establish a 20-MPH school -zone speed limit. The recommendation includes installations of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Additionally, portions of Yucaipa Boulevard may fall within the 500-foot to 1000-foot school -zone approach area associated with the ILCS YBC Campus. Therefore, a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment may be considered with appropriate transitions, warning, and regulatory signage installed in accordance with the California MUTCD.

2. Avenue E, Bryant Street, and California Street — Roadway Segments Adjacent to Inland Leaders Charter School & Faith Lutheran Preschool The roadway segments Avenue E, Bryant Street, and California Street are adjacent to and within the vicinity of the Inland Leaders Charter School and Faith Lutheran Preschool. The Segments reviewed include Segment No. 29 on Avenue E from California Street to Fremont Street, Segment No. 37 on Bryant Street from Yucaipa Boulevard to Wildwood Canyon Road, Segment No. 41 on California Street from Avenue B to Avenue E, and Segment No. 42 on California Street from Avenue E to Wildwood Canyon Road. The Segments studies with their corresponding existing posted speed limits are shown below.

E0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
13 "`° 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382�.w_� LIMIT
20 20 City of Yucaipa
_ ate; .r•-�r
_ • � , ,� SCHOOL } , �{ '
• •.6• �• t �� .SPEED - �� ♦(
•S - i .r LIMIT -w 7JIP�_
Inland Leaders Charter 25 1,_:M;A.,1 'i •
Ir
y�L ,`ra SPEED Y
+ •. s' a .'+. ��tl �"'fro
Faith Lutheran Preschool -#:] SPEELIMIT D
- - 35 ,r! w
•. ` �_ • SPEED
LIMIT` �, •1 • f
IL
.: w. + - : • ". .ter,. • a•�. � � "l +._ •. � :ih.11.!t•. r Avenue E is located adjacent to the southern side of Inland Leaders Charter School and Faith Lutheran Preschool and the roadway currently has a posted speed limit of 25- MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential, civic and institutional, and commercial land uses. An existing crosswalk is present near California Street; however, no flashing beacons were observed within the imagery reviewed.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 29 of Avenue E from California Street to Fremont Street was determined to be 30- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/Civic & Institutional and the 85th percentile speed was 41-MPH (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

2.1 Recommendations:

Based upon the information reviewed, the portion of the roadway of Avenue E between California Street and Bryant Street SCHOOL appears to fall within the school -zone limits associated with L'IME SR4-,(CA) Inland Leaders Charter School and Faith Lutheran Preschool. 20 Assembly c 2W0 According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to erect signage accordingly to establish a 20-MPH MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
14 SPEED 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 LIMIT
20 20 City of Yucaipa
school -zone speed limit. The recommendation includes installations of S4-1 (CA) & S4- 5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

The remaining portion of Avenue E extending beyond Bryant Street appears to function as a school -zone approach area and may continue to operate under the existing 25- MPH speed limit, which is consistent with the school -zone approach treatment identified under AB 382.

Bryant Street is located adjacent to the western side of Inland Leaders Charter School and Faith Lutheran Preschool and the roadway currently has a posted speed limit of 35- MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential land uses.

An existing crosswalk, school pavement markings, and school crossing signs were observed; however, no flashing beacons were observed within the imagery reviewed.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 37 of Bryant Street from Yucaipa Boulevard to Wildwood Canyon Road was determined to be 35-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/Civic & Institutional and the 85th percentile speed was 42-MPH (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified 17 reported crashes within Segment No. 37, including two severe injury collisions. One bicyclist was identified within the reviewed collision data. The reported collision types included broadside, rear -end, head-on, and sideswipe collisions.

Number of Crashes by Crash Severity crash severity cDunt 2 11.75.,.
4 izx
3 - �ni..r'/ iCth9c• V„Icier 52._•1%
- .'+jury l�l [ G' Fa i,. 5 25.2_
2 ratal 2 - inpry ISeverei S - In.jry (C:her . - Ir x., Ywa4e) (CDmplair.: a
Pain)
Crash Severity
Number of Victims by Victim Role victlni Role cDunt
5 =etlenrlan a a.e•as
c. Ic
�5 1
t-7mier 2- 5-0-.hr 6-14on-
Passenger Pecostria-- Injured
Party
victim Role
• 2-PaSssr9e • 3 wcL_rri::• • •1-C+kr-1 s!
• ' _. � c Nsn-I�;urc� Farr}
(0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 15

�20
LIMN
20 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 City of Yucaipa
„_12'.

S4MW
4;e, Kkl Pxk
• A14111: C
_ I
_

1.,'IUC J
•
Y�AAID. I
•
y
PlanrnnlAry
S:Nnsi
PI t.A'l FY.

H.�Fv
2a r
CC:Ln IK
r
u
• AVENUE C
• AYlNUC E
•
I •
AYENUf E •
A Wi C ,
V
1 -1� JUJLtASIh
•-J,:r!A
FV Iu4KA :Yr�
I I
� l
(1
•
•
R • / C
P j
P�.

DR 7 •
i
t l
�
1y
^
AIOyN EA:M v:EW 5' � `1
0 �'
?ELLA V ST•v D'
/1 • ' y
•
.Uk:IGit1 DR
r.YVFI\;7
YAKN,N, Un
01AIR DD
Mli E.LM LV
/
• .:I'_UIY
JUU Cfi'I'i t"1 R4.
_
'� . nlll U'NU4U EANYDN KU •

2.2 Recommendations:

Based on the upon the information reviewed, the portion of the roadway of SCHOOL Bryant Street appears to fall withing the school -zone limits that is associated with Inland Leaders Charter School and Faith Lutheran Preschool. The SPEED portion of Bryant Street between Avenue A and Eureka Avenue appears to LIMIT fall within the 500-foot to 1000-foot school -zone approach area and may be 25� considered for implementation of a 25-MPH school -zone approach WHEN

CHILDREN
treatment consistent With the provisions of AB 382. ARE PRESENT Appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques should be installed at appropriate locations in accordance with the California MUTCD. 0 IMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 16

SPEED
LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20 City of Yucaipa ?12�
The remaining portions of Bryant Street extending beyond the school -zone approach limits do not appear to have need modification under AB 382 based on school proximity alone.

Additionally, due to the documented severe injury collisions and bicyclist involvement identified withing the reviewed TIMS collision data, the segments may need further evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7 to determine if additional speed management measures are appropriate.

California Street is located adjacent western side of Inland Leaders Charter School and Faith Lutheran Preschool and the roadway currently has a posted school -zone speed limit of 25-MPH when children are present. The roadway consists of a one travel lane in each direction with a continuous center two-way left -turn lane and is boarded by an adjacent school and commercial land uses. An existing crosswalk is present near California Street; however, no flashing beacons nor SCHOOL warning sign was observed within the imagery reviewed.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 41 of California Street from Avenue B to Avenue E was determined to be 25-MPH, as the adjacent land us was found to be School/Commercial and the 85th percentile speed was 35-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

2.3 Recommendations:

Based on the upon the information reviewed, the portion of the roadway of California Street between Avenue E and Avenue C appear to fall within the school -zone limits associated with Inland Leaders Charter School and Faith Lutheran Preschool. According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to update the existing school -zone treatment from 25-MPH when children are present to 20-MPH when children are present.

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

The remaining portions of California Street extending beyond the school -zone limits may continue to operate under the existing 25-MPH speed limit.

California Street is located adjacent Southern Side to Inland Leaders Charter School and Faith Lutheran Preschool and currently has a posted speed limit of 40-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent school, residential, and commercial land uses. Existing roadway features include a continuous center two-way left -turn lane. The segment is directly adjacent to the school frontage and serves as a primary access route for school -related traffic activity. (0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 17

SPEED MIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20 City of Yucaipa
Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 42 of California Street from Avenue E to Wildwood Canyon Road was determined to be 40-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/School and the 85th percentile speed was 48-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified twelve reported crashes within Segment No. 42, including one severe injury collision and two bicyclists identified within the reviewed collision data.

AVFNJ-
n
r� Yucaipa
� E(QRip fl [:.fY
SC3100t

VULA LN

AVFNUE E
•
AVEN'J' E _
v
•
iJ
I
r
r
�
• I
.FURFK4 AV'-
El, r!FK -�,-F
r
�i
i
.DR
1 •
iJJ
�r
yw-
n�
r
�T�
m �
y
I�
•
I
� '
1 I
• 104 _N
EL'A. _N
I
r
r
�
i
,f
a j
I
:anu CANYON RD
IMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
18 SPEED 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 LIMIT
20 ?� City of Yucaipa
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
3'
_ Injury lSevcreI _ - Ir '.I =CI':

Painl
Crash Severity
Number of Victims by Victim Role
?aserccr P•.°estran
VRctm7 Oc. _
• .. • _ �-as__r�c • _ - r=tc stria•

2.4 Recommendations:

Crash Severity
Count %
= - Ir.-ry iSev`re;

8.33'.
;i-In;ury i0?nor+. sltl.m
7 56.33°
:. Fa.ni
• 33.33.,,
Victim Role
Drr. —'
-Pas =•: fp'., er
3 _
Count
According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, roadway segments located within the school -zone limits may be considered for implementation of a 20-MPH school -zone limit. Based upon the reviewed information, portions of California Street within Segment No. 42 appear to fall within the applicable school -zone limits associated with Inland Leaders Charter School and Faith Lutheran Preschool.

According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to establish a 20-MPH school -zone speed limit within �2"p the applicable school -zone limits. The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Additionally, portions of California Street beyond the school -zone limits may function as an approach to the school -zone area within the 500-foot to 1,000-foot school distance.

Therefore, a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment may be considered with appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques in accordance with the California MUTCD.
4 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 19

M. 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 z'o
20 City of Yucaipa
Additionally, due to the documented severe injury collision and bicyclist involvement identified within the reviewed TIMS collision data, the segment may warrant further evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7.

3. 3rd Street, Avenue H, California Street, and County Line Road - Roadway Segments Adjacent to Calimesa Elementary School The roadway segments 3rd Street, Avenue H, California Street, and County Line Road are adjacent to and within the vicinity of Calimesa Elementary School. The Segments reviewed include Segment No. 5 on 3rd Street from Wildwood Canyon Road to County Line Road, Segment No. 31 on Avenue H from 2nd Street to Bryant Street, Segment No. 44 on California Street from Avenue H to County Line Road, and Segment No. 53 on County Line Road from 3rd Street to Bryant Street. The Segments studied with their corresponding existing posted speed limits are shown below. d'
- • `:-.',...Y. �' ' �F t • ;,�- SPEED +r l • 1 ..

R _ J. • r.® LIMIT �_. •A
`
35 ;
for
Calimesa Elementary Seh001,., }`. s
1� : t'*Ir
qP
:- 1 _ :-.,fir •VA•_
.� - LIMIT ♦ - _ � �' _7 y•
SPEED�j�, t•� - 35 - " x . i q•'�.

LIMIT a -T•d � r N ` a _* Y•
•
III
iL
,�,� \\. .,_ — �ti h .��• SPEED f"" "`AIM,
•.

P• '~ `��y LIMIT y,` .� �" •1.a +�
_ ' ` lV �' , ' Lam• •! l� i _ , k
0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20

SCNOOL r
2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 Pao , 7
z° 20 City of Yucaipa
3rd Street is located within the vicinity of Calimesa Elementary School towards western side of the school. This roadway has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH and consists of two-way roadway with adjacent residential land uses. There were no school -zone speed limit signs, school crossing signs, marked crosswalks, or flashing beacons were observed within the imagery reviewed.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across the Segment No. 5 of V Street from Wildwood Canyon Road to County Line Road was determined to be 35-MPH, as the adjacent land use was discovered to be Residential and the 851" percentile speed was 42-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified six reported crashes within Segment No. 5. No fatal collisions, severe injury collisions, pedestrian collisions, or bicycle collisions were identified.

3.1 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, Segment No. 5 does not appear to fall within the school -zone limits or school -zone approach limits associated with Calimesa Elementary School. Therefore, no modification is recommended under AB 382. The existing speed limit is recommended to remain unchanged based upon the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS.

Avenue H is located within the vicinity of Calimesa Elementary School and currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential, commercial, and institutional land uses. No school crossing signs, school pavement markings, bicycle facilities, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery. Crosswalks were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 31 of Avenue H from 2nd Street to Bryant Street was determined to be 35-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/Commercial/Institutional and the 85th percentile speed was 39-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified three reported crashes within Segment No. 31. No fatal collisions were identified. One severe injury collision, one pedestrian -involved collision, and one pedestrian victim were identified within the reviewed collision history.
0' MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 21

LIMIT
io 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 - City of Yucaipa
Victim Role
61 rs
r
7 f -J

I K E Y
o
Number of Victims by Victim Role
1 2- 3- S'Cyclist 5 - Other 6 - Non-
Oasscnqar Pedestrian injured
Pany
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
0 ratal 2 - injury (Severel Z - Injury (Other 4 - Injury Visible] Complaint of
Paint
Crash Severity
0 1 e - k"" --, * .- 0 4 -
Victim Role
i - Orjve'
2 -Passcnq�r
3 - pedestrian
31--vclis:
5 - 0-.her
Crash Severity
� - F-3:al
2 - Injury rSev-arc)
3 - Injury (Other Visible)
.; - . jury iCcrnplair.t of Pain)
Count %
2 53.Q-1
Count
2 OC-1
. 3 -1. 3

66.67,
A
1 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
22 UMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 LIMIT
20 �� City of Yucaipa

3.2 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, portions of Avenue H appear to function as an approach to the school -zone area associated with Calimesa Elementary School. The portion of Avenue H between 2nd Street and California Street appears to fall within the 500-foot to 1,000-foot school -zone approach area and may be considered for implementation of a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment consistent with the provisions of AB 382.

Appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques should be installed at appropriate locations in accordance with the California MUTCD.

Additionally, due to the documented severe injury collision, pedestrian involvement, and pedestrian victim identified within the reviewed TIMS collision data, the segment may warrant further evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7 to determine whether additional speed management measures are appropriate.

California Street is located within the vicinity of Calimesa Elementary School and currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential land uses. Existing school -related treatments were observed, including school crossing signs, marked crosswalks, and "SLOW SCHOOL XING" pavement markings.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 44 of California Street from Avenue H to County Line Road was determined to be 35-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential and the 85th percentile speed was 43-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet.

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified five reported crashes within Segment No. 44, including one severe injury collision. The reviewed collision data also identified one pedestrian -involved collision and one bicycle -involved collision.
/(0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
23 F-�
LIMIT
� 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 City of Yucaipa
47 z
T:' 51
e7 0;
A
I
L r) 1p
5 A t, -,-.A R. C. 11 c.

SAN P. C-
11-4 Z 9 0
j-
--0 J k RY PL
T
Number of Victims by Victim Role Victim Role Count %
T - Drive- 3 so."T"'
2 - Passelv:er 67,"
414 6, 3 -;',�estnan 1 16.67',".

P0
1 -Driver 2- .3 - 4 - 6 - Non-
0'n-
=assenqer Pedestrian Injjrcd
Party
Victim Role
1 - 0 2 -
6 - Jtrc' Al 6 - No-InjoicC Party
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
24 M ° 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 o
City of Yucaipa
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
{
- F--_3
2 - :njury (Severe!
3 - In=ury
4 - Injury
Visib!el
(COnlrs!aln: ci
Fain)
Crash Severity
0 , ' Fa:a 0 !
3 I"j J`% !L:M1 C'.. - J _.
.I ' '1jJl f Jccp
ai'1'

3.3 Recommendations:

Crash Severity Count %
Fya' C 000111r.
2 - Injury ice,,=rei 1 20.00%
3 - Injury (Other Vaiblei 3 o�Ao%
<. --'nIu•y IComplaln: aY paint 1 20!00%
Based upon the reviewed information, California Street appears to function as an approach to the school -zone area associated with Calimesa Elementary School. The portion of California Street located within the 500-foot to 1,000-foot school -zone approach area may be considered for implementation of a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment consistent with the provisions of AB 382.

Appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques should be installed at appropriate locations in accordance with the California MUTCD.

Additionally, due to the documented severe injury collision, pedestrian involvement, and bicyclist involvement identified within the reviewed TIMS collision data, the segment may warrant further evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7 to determine whether additional speed management measures are appropriate.

County Line Road is located within the vicinity of Calimesa Elementary School and currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH with an existing 25-MPH when children are present school -zone speed limit. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential land uses. Existing school -related treatments were observed, including school crossing signs, marked crosswalks, bicycle facilities, and school pavement markings. No flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 53 of County Line Road from 3rd Street to Bryant Street was determined to be 35- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential and the 85th percentile speed was 38-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified four reported crashes within Segment No. 53. No fatal collisions were identified. One severe injury collision was identified within the reviewed collision history. i0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
25 LIMIT
2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 City Of Yucaipa
T A R P%-
O SA K *—A,;,
C-
COIJKty CINE'RU
J
z
T
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity Crash Severity Count % (Se —re) 0 0.0013.
nj-ry iOtlier V --,ible) 4
,jury :Com.piair,. of Pa nj 0 0.00111;1
4 3-Injury!Other -Injury
visinie! !complain W
Pain:

Crash Severity
0 1 Fxa: 02 ---oi
Number of Victims by Victim Role Victim Role Count
4 2 0
tri3r.
62 I - Driver 2- B;cycfist 5 - Other 6 -Von-
Passenger P,2c,striarn Injured
Party
victim Role
0 7 Dr! o' 0 2 passcrge' 0 3 - Pccstria-. 4 - Mycrsl.
* 5 ql- 0 6 Non-lmurcc Party
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 26

5 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 �TIM`W�
20 20 City of Yucaipa

3.4 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, County Line Road appears to function as an approach to the school -zone area associated with Calimesa Elementary School.

According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the existing school -zone treatment may be updated accordingly.

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

The portion of County Line Road located within the school -zone approach area may continue to operate under a 25-MPH school -zone treatment consistent with the provisions of AB 382. Appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques should be installed or updated as necessary to conform to current California MUTCD requirements.

Additionally, due to the documented severe injury collision identified within the reviewed TIMS collision data, the segment may warrant further evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7.

SCHOOL
SPEED
MIT

4. 5t'' Street and Oak Glen Road - Roadway 20 Asembly4-1 )C Segments Adjacent to Competitive Edge Charter
Academy
5th Street and Oak Glen Road are roadway segments 2�0
located adjacent to and within the vicinity of Competitive Edge Charter Academy. The segments reviewed include Segment No. 7 on 5th Street from Oak Glen Road to Yucaipa Boulevard, Segment No. 79 on Oak Glen Road from Bryant Street to 5th Street, and Segment No. 80 on Oak Glen Road from 5th Street to Yucaipa Boulevard. The Segments studies with their corresponding existing posted speed limits are shown below.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
27 SPEED
LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20 City of Yucaipa
We
A E
�r C
tr Competitive Edge Charter Academy �: n
'a
LIMIT i
rn� 45 ti -V41 ; 4%
'A
RTr` `.. o. � � �; ;. r; ;Irk y �?' , . - _ •�.i - R .. * `, 21.

1. :-y � a ' ''ter ''� � •� � ��' -
�.: t"r— r! ti:, , t L J t t. t Sal(
__
51" Street is located directly adjacent west side to Competitive Edge Charter Academy and currently has a posted speed limit of 40-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-lane roadway with adjacent residential land uses. Existing school -related treatments were observed including a marked crosswalk, school crossingo sign, bicycle lane, and school pavement markings. Historical imagery review identified an existing 25-MPH when children are present school -zone speed limit that appears to have subsequently been removed. No flashing beacon was observed.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 7 of 5th Street from Oak Glen Road to Yucaipa Boulevard was determined to be 45- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/Civic & Institutional and the 85th percentile speed was 50-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Reviewing the most recent available 5-year TIMS collision data identified 14 reported crashes within Segment No. 7, including five severe injury collisions. The reviewed collision data also identified two bicyclists involved in reported crashes. Primary collision factors included unsafe speed, traffic signals and signs, automobile right-of-way violations, and driving under the influence.
10 I° . MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
28 SPEED �
LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20
City of Yucaipa
E jp
Sy i
L
>
r
Ir
7 1-

CIGAR AVE
ct". 1c11
'fUCAIPA BLVD
On YII5A1P.ABLVD
0 0
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
2 - -- ---I- -- - --I- -I--
raa: 2-Inj,ryiS—rc: 4 - Injury
(Complain: ct
P.,M)
C"f,h Severity
Crash S--ty Count %
rala G 0001:
35,7'
3 of Fa.'j 25.57'-
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
29 LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20 City of Yucaipa
Number of Victims by Victim Role
Victim Role
Victim Role
Count
- Crver
;1 73.331::
- F3;5•2nccr
2 13.33Ct.
3 - ?edc,Uien
0 -- - 3'r."d 7

2. 13.33",.
- C[Rcr
0 0.00",

4.1 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, the portion of 5th Street adjacent to Competitive Edge Charter Academy appears to fall within the school -zone limits associated with the school. According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to erect signage accordingly to establish a 20-MPH school -zone speed limit.

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Additionally, due to the documented severe injury collisions and bicyclist involvement identified within the reviewed TIMS collision data, the segment may warrant further evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7 to determine whether additional speed management measures are appropriate.

Oak Glen Road is located adjacent north side to Competitive Edge Charter Academy and Yucaipa Community Park and currently has a posted speed limit of 45-MPH.

Existing school -related treatments were observed including school crossing signs, a school ahead warning sign, marked crosswalks, and bicycle lanes. The roadway serves both the school and adjacent recreational facilities.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 79 of Oak Glen Road from Bryant Street to 5th Street was determined to be 45- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/Parks & Recreation and the 85th percentile speed was 48-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified 12 reported crashes within Segment No. 79, including one severe injury collision, one pedestrian - involved collision, and one bicyclist -involved collision.

K MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 30

SPEED LIMIT
2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 1 Y_;_ 0
a
wit S
'e
,ORES- LS
Oak Gle I
Number of Victims by Victim Role Victim Role Count
Passenger
ic 3 - pedestrian 1
4 - Bicvclis:
5 - Other 0 3.0 i
0 1 -:)river 2- 5- B,cyclist 5 - O!ht., 6 - Nr'n-
Passnnqer Pc:-Cstriac injured
Party
Victim Role
0 - L: 0 -1 -
0 0 e. Non -Inca Past,
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
2 0
Fa -,a: 2 - injury !Severe( 3 - Injury (Other 4 - Injury visiblel (Complaint of
Pain;
Crash Severity
a ' 0 2 - 1rjJ"; M -o'O 0 3 - Injury (0ruic, V ' b'(.,) 0 d - Irj-j'y cf PL.11) Crash Severity Count %
1 - Fa:a J 0.00"'..
2 - Injury �;Severe) . 3.33,,
3 - Injury !Other Visib e7 53.339,
4 - nju'y !Complain*. of Fain) 4 33.33",4
(0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 31

zo LIMT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 129 City of Yucaipa

4.2 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, portions of Oak Glen Road adjacent to Competitive Edge Charter Academy appear to fall within the school -zone limits associated with the school. According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to erect signage accordingly to establish a 20-MPH school -zone speed limit where the roadway falls within the applicable school -zone limits.

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Additionally, due to the documented pedestrian and bicyclist involvement and severe injury collision identified within the reviewed TIMS collision data, the segment may warrant further evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7.

Oak Glen Road from 5th Street to Yucaipa Boulevard also serves Competitive Edge Charter Academy and currently has a posted speed limit of 45-MPH. Existing roadway features include a marked crosswalk and bicycle lane. No flashing beacons or existing school -zone speed limit signs were observed.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 80 of Oak Glen Road from 5th Street to Yucaipa Boulevard was determined to be 45-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential and the 85th percentile speed was 54-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified 25 reported crashes within Segment No. 80, including one fatal collision, three severe injury collisions, two pedestrian -involved collisions, and one bicyclist -involved collision. 4re ek i VA -F.

Yucaipa Valley j .. t;KF 3
Golf c:ub.. aAi
PIkEN�J75T un
�Y nipi Vi¢ley
ReCaSI Center
i i • — �1 eCA pn rsi�Va •i
.�t:SYr. rr;h al?
s. !
S
w�
4�C�n
r'F0.

AV
Ktb' J MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
32 LIMIT�SPEE2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 MIT
20 20 City of Yucaipa
Number of Victims by Victim Role
35%
Fas¢mrg�r Feae s.r
Vicfin, Role
+ter• .... ...... _.... _.
-
n;ured
oar•1
Vwfi Role
. Duoc'
- Fasser�er
3 - Feo^.trian
.. - 31_y[1i5.
5 - Ott —
count
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity Crash sevarity Count _ 10 3-In7ury!°thcr V'cibl.,)
4 - ,iury {Complain; of Pon) 14 56.00r:;,
- ru:s 2 ^ In1jry iSevorel 3 - wiry (Ocher 4 - In,i
vi5ioiv (Contplalnc cf
Pain:

Cr;,sh Severi(y
• _ __._ • : secl • 1 I^,v.•r;C',-V _f F;:'^'•

4.3 Recommendations:

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Due to the documented fatal collision, severe injury collisions, pedestrian involvement, and bicyclist involvement identified within the reviewed TIMS collision data, this segment warrants additional evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7 to determine whether further speed management measures are appropriate.

5. 6th Street, 7th Street, Avenue E, and Yucaipa Boulevard - Roadway Segments Adjacent to Oak View High School
6th Street, 7th Street, Avenue E, and Yucaipa Boulevard are roadway segments located adjacent to and within the vicinity of Oak View High School. The segments reviewed include Segment No. 10 on 6th Street from Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E, Segment No. 12 on 7th Street from Yucaipa Boulevard to Enoch Avenue, Segment No. 28 on Avenue E from 8th Street to California Street, and Segment No. 97 on Yucaipa (0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
33 R
2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 City of Yucaipa ",
Boulevard from Oak Glen Road to 5th Street. The Segments studies with their corresponding existing posted speed limits are shown below. ._l.. 't SPEED yy ' "�R. .. I � - I "I _ .. , t 1. 'f�i ', •- I _ LIMIT I.i - � � ` �- ( 1n.,1 I i• 7 �.
.� . 40 •_' W.,

1.�.�:e 35
35 Y �_4; Oak View High School h►iti
..• �. Ha.— .,fir, _ Y _
�• SPEEDI� YF'•- "f ✓- SPEED
f5 ` : t t LIMIT _ j Gr LIMIT
35 tr'iW• ZG I r
..i-'ZCut
jz
61 Street is located directly adjacent eastern side to Oak View High School and currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH with an existing 25-MPH when children are present school -zone speed limit. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential and commercial land uses. Existing school - related treatments were observed including a school crossing sign, marked 1 crosswalk, and school pavement markings. No flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 10 of 6th Street from Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E was determined to be 35- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/Commercial and the 85th percentile speed was 44-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Reviewing the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified nine reported crashes within Segment No. 10. No fatal collisions or severe injury collisions were identified. One bicyclist was identified within the reviewed collision data.

5.1 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, Segment No. 10 appears to fall entirely within the school -zone limits associated with Oak View High School. According to the 0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
34 lMi 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 zo
20 City of Yucaipa
aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to update the existing school -zone treatment from 25-MPH when children are present to 20-MPH when children are present.

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).
7th Street is located adjacent west side to Oak View High School and currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential land uses. A marked crosswalk was observed within the reviewed imagery. No school crossing signs, school pavement markings, bicycle lanes, or flashing beacons were observed. The roadway is also located adjacent to a public park situated behind the school grounds.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 12 of 7th Street from Yucaipa Boulevard to Enoch Avenue was determined to be 35-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/Civic & Institutional and the 85th percentile speed was 41-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified eleven reported crashes within Segment No. 12, including one severe injury collision. The reviewed collision data also identified one bicyclist involved in a reported collision.

Mna,msAs-
NnRCCIu LY w
All '+ _
i
0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 35

SPEED
Mn 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 �20 20 City of Yucaipa
Number of Victims by Victim Role
•• - 5<cyc list S - Cther 6 - Micn-
nl.:red
party
Victim Role
0 ' L ..
• t
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
T
i
- ra:a 2 -'njvey (Se,. -ere! 3 - 1:

Crash Severity
• " 4:La1 _ , ..,. _ _'Cl40 3 Injxy IU"1Cr Vs b'ci • •1 - ^.juw Icon±l+:9 in•. Cf F.

5.2 Recommendations:

Victim R.I.
i - Drv, r
i - F:c::_nccr
3 -Pedestrian
- Him-y[I s:
5 - O:he,
Court
Crash Severity Count %
- ra:a0 OA3'i.
.. - Injuni iSe;nre?
3 - Injur/ tCthe' V. siblei 5 45.45%
..-'njur, ICcirplaim of Farm 5 d5:35'i4.

Based upon the reviewed information, portions of 7th Street appear to fall within the school -zone limits associated with Oak View High School. According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to establish a 20-MPH school -zone speed limit within the applicable school -zone limits.

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Appropriate school warning signs, school crossing signs, and supplemental plaques should also be installed as necessary to clearly define the school -zone limits.

Additionally, due to the documented severe injury collision and bicyclist involvement identified within the reviewed TIMS collision data, the segment may warrant further evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
36 LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20 City of Yucaipa
Avenue E is located within the vicinity of Oak View High School and currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential land uses. A marked crosswalk was observed near California Street. No school crossing signs, school warning signs, school pavement markings, bicycle lanes, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 28 of Avenue E from 8th Street to California Street was determined to be 35-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/Civic & Institutional and the 85th percentile speed was 41-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified thirty-three reported crashes within Segment No. 28, including one fatal collision and one severe injury collision. The reviewed collision data also identified one pedestrian -involved collision and one bicyclist -involved collision.

L.MN
�_-
J . • loon..[ • • • • •• • • • • • • •4W • AVfMU[E, • a• • • • • • •• • • ell-1• • •• • • • • AVCMU.• _ •.�,la rxrl ,,;
~ -----
-Ai 1'1'[v,
fuVY�[k :1M -
�v
� 4>
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity Cram severity C.—It ,. - Inl�ry 1 3.03'.:
3 - lnj'ry (Ott— V. Dle) ID
c -'nju: y (Cv plaimt or Fa:ni 15 •.5,45".
...._. . _ -
- F' _ - ln,ury (-everel 3 - Injury (Other 4 -Injury
V157bte{ (c-.mplaln". of
P a1nI
Cush Severity
• �.,.,,. • 2 I�yury acvcrGl • a - .- . -.. _ . : o:c, • n - Injury rcem,;:a�n: ar P�Lni Number of Victims by Victim ROIL, Viemn R.I. coupe i

2.27",
Driv_r 2- - •• - cTcycllsc - Other 6 - Non-
na..._nCer P^Qasirlan Ir,J_d
arty
Victim Ro/r
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 37

SCNDQ4 •.."�-L
LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 , v 20 City of Yucaipa

5.3 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, the portion of Avenue E between 7th Street and 6th Street appears to fall within the school -zone limits associated with Oak View High School and may be considered for implementation of a 20-MPH school -zone speed limit pursuant to AB 382.

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Portions of Avenue E extending beyond the school -zone limits but remaining within the 500-foot to 1,000-foot school -zone approach area may be considered for implementation of a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment consistent with the provisions of AB 382.

The remaining portions of the roadway extending beyond the school -zone approach limits do not appear to warrant modification under AB 382 based on school proximity alone.

Additionally, due to the documented fatal collision, severe injury collision, pedestrian involvement, and bicyclist involvement identified within the reviewed TIMS collision data, the segment may warrant further evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7 to determine whether additional speed management measures are appropriate.

Yucaipa Boulevard is located within the vicinity of Oak View High School and currently has a posted speed limit of 40-MPH. The roadway functions as a major east -west arterial roadway serving residential and commercial land uses. Existing roadway features include marked crosswalks and bicycle lanes. No school -related signs, school pavement markings, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 97 of Yucaipa Boulevard from Oak Glen Road to 5th Street was determined to be 40-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Business/Civic & Institutional and the 85th percentile speed was 46-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified thirty-three reported crashes within Segment No. 97, including one fatal collision and four severe injury collisions. The reviewed collision data also identified two pedestrian -involved collisions and four bicyclist -involved collisions.

5.4 Recommendations:

Although Segment No. 97 was reviewed due to its proximity to Oak View High School, the roadway does not appear to fall within the applicable school -zone limits or school - zone approach limits identified under AB 382.
�(+':]JMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
38 LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 o
20 City of Yucaipa
Therefore, no modification is recommended under AB 382. However, due to the documented fatal collision, severe injury collisions, pedestrian involvement, and bicyclist involvement identified within the reviewed TIMS collision data, the segment may warrant further evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7 to determine whether additional speed management measures are appropriate.

6. 8t' Street, Avenue E, and Washington Drive - Roadway Segments Adjacent to Valley Elementary School
8th Street, Avenue E, and Washington Drive are roadway segments located within the vicinity of Valley Elementary School. The segments reviewed include Segment No. 13 on 8th Street from Liberty Road to Avenue E, Segment No. 28 on Avenue E from 8th Street to California Street, and Segment No. 88 on Washington Drive from 9th Street to 711 Street. The Segments studies with their corresponding existing posted speed limits are shown below.
40 sip
^'� ✓ 4 Vallev Elementary School
Sri: C •.,. r- �'�► ;:1 i ►'= `rt T E J` 1 t
�• � j�R��r✓ � '�� f .• SPEED -i �-SI.• , _ � � - 1 -

I SPEED
{aAy ��. r_,pF W••1. 35 • LIMIT 1 ` _.
35 y��AIO eY,�•'" �r `R`'jF `-, „• ,�t*,y •- �•rY t• ! H. _ _ � I '`T .. +' tv
4i:a'• `�... ` 3 0 +~, 1C.,I., I&
Avenue E located within the vicinity of Valley Elementary School and currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential land uses. A marked crosswalk was observed near California Street. No school crossing signs, school warning signs, school pavement markings, bicycle lanes, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

�ib
EED 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 M
20, City of Yucaipa
Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified thirty-three reported crashes within Segment No. 28, including one fatal collision and one severe injury collision. The reviewed collision data also identified one pedestrian -involved collision and one bicyclist -involved collision.

6.1 Recommendations:

It should be noted that Segment No. 28 was also evaluated under Oak View High School due to its closer proximity to that campus. As discussed previously, portions of Avenue E between 7th Street and 6th Street may be considered for implementation of a 20-MPH school -zone speed limit associated with Oak View High School. The same roadway segment also falls within the school -zone approach area associated with Valley Elementary School and may therefore qualify for a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment under AB 382.

Based upon the reviewed information, portions of Avenue E appear to fall within the school -zone approach area associated with Valley Elementary School. Portions of Avenue E located within the 500-foot to 1,000-foot school -zone approach area may be considered for implementation of a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment consistent with the provisions of AB 382.

Appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques should be installed at appropriate locations in accordance with the California MUTCD.

Washington Drive is located within the vicinity of Valley Elementary School and currently has a posted speed limit of 30-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential land uses. No school -related signs, school pavement markings, marked crosswalks, bicycle lanes, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 88 of Avenue E from 9th Street to 7th Street was determined to be 30-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/Civic & Institutional and the 85th percentile speed was 35-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified no reported crashes within Segment No. 88.
(0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
40 uroDL
SPEED 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 ; /r i 1 MIT
20 20 City of Yucaipa

6.2 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, Washington Drive appears to fall within the 500- foot to 1,000-foot school -zone approach area associated with Valley Elementary School. Therefore, a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment may be considered consistent with the provisions of AB 382.

Appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques should be installed at appropriate locations in accordance with the California MUTCD.

No further modifications are recommended under AB 1014 as no reported fatal, severe injury, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist -involved collisions were identified within the reviewed 5-year TIMS collision history.
8th Street is located within the vicinity of Valley Elementary School and currently has a posted speed limit of 30-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential land uses. A marked crosswalk was observed within the reviewed imagery. No school -related signs, school crossing signs, school pavement markings, bicycle lanes, or flashing beacons were observed.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 13 of 8th Street was determined to be 30-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential and the 85th percentile speed was 40-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified one reported crash within Segment No. 13. No fatal collisions, severe injury collisions, pedestrian - involved collisions, or bicyclist -involved collisions were identified.

6.3 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, Segment No. 13 does not appear to fall within the applicable school -zone limits or school -zone approach limits associated with Valley Elementary School as identified under AB 382. Furthermore, review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified no fatal, severe injury, pedestrian - involved, or bicyclist -involved collisions.

Therefore, no modifications are recommended under either AB 382 or AB 1014, and the existing speed limit is recommended to remain unchanged.

7. Chapman Heights Road and 10th Street — Roadway Segments Adjacent to Chapman Heights Elementary School
Chapman Heights Road and 10th Street are roadway segments located adjacent to and within the vicinity of Chapman Heights Elementary School. The segments reviewed include Segment No. 50 on Chapman Heights Road from 10th Streer to Oak Glen Road t0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
:[I

M. 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20 City of Yucaipa
and Segment No. 14 on 10th Street from Chapman Heights Road to Yucaipa Boulevard. The Segments studies with their corresponding existing posted speed limits are shown below.

Chapman Heights Elementary School
Fp ti 'b. ,` MIL �Y r , � . ��. r•i �'-'s� v~w- s -.tau JV
t `~- •ter, Ms ' r '-... ° "1 V ,•••f' ,.�' i
AAr

00.0 IWO
- �.'•• y T'�` • � 4:''l;,,n. , T� � ter.- 7 � � ��1�� f �/ _fi ' . � �- s�, �_ �!> fit' gip' �. ,• ,� , n.-%�
i.
00pe`' , "
Chapman Heights Road is located directly adjacent to Chapman Heights Elementary School and currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH with an existing 25-MPH when children are present school -zone speed limit. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential land uses. Existing roadway features include marked crosswalks and bicycle lanes. No flashing beacons, school crossing signs, or school pavement markings were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 50 of Chapman Heights Road from 10th Street to Oak Glen Road was determined to be 35-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/Open Space/Commercial and the 85th percentile speed was 42-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified twelve reported crashes within Segment No. 50, including two severe injury collisions.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
42 LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 City of Yucaipa
QU
z
8-
0H'Lk Rrj
"A0
41 A?D
Yucaipa Valley
Colt club
rfl
an C Y—ip. VAI.V
R-tall Cilqtsr
Number of Victims by Victim Role Victim Role Count 7`1
Drive- 7 3. 7 5
2 - Fa.-ginger
3 - Pedestrian

4. - Bicyclist
Other
3 - 4 - Bicyclist 5 - Other 6 - Non-
�3 5e ng e r Peaestria+ Injured
Party
Victim Role
4 - eicy]Es:
6 No, In c= Pa I
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
-,7:, --Fi —2,,2re) 3 - Injury (Othcr
Visible;
4 - Injury
lComplaint: of
Painl
Crash Severity
0 , -J:n 9, - ,
Crash Severity
Count %
I - Fa,.r
0 2 - Injury (Severe?
2 16.67",-,
3 - irj,rj ;Ctho-'.' > blci
7 58.33%
4 - -JU-j lC7TP13I-.-. 01 Pain)
3 M00%
0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
43 XMODI _
LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 1 z'o
20 City of Yucaipa

7.1 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, Segment No. 50 appears to fall within the school - zone limits associated with Chapman Heights Elementary School. According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to update the existing school -zone treatment from 25-MPH when children are present to 20-MPH when children are present.

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Additionally, due to the documented severe injury collisions identified within the reviewed TIMS collision data, the segment may warrant further evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7.
10th Street is located within the vicinity of Chapman Heights Elementary School and currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential land uses. A marked crosswalk and crossing sign were observed within the reviewed imagery. No school -related signs, school pavement markings, bicycle lanes, or flashing beacons were observed.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 14 of 10th Street from Chapman Heights Road to Yucaipa Boulevard was determined to be 35-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential and the 85th percentile speed was 43-MPH. (see Appendix for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified eleven reported crashes within Segment No. 14, including two severe injury collisions and one pedestrian -involved collision.
(0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
44 SPEED �
L-T 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20
City of Yucaipa
nt3ryYucaipa 44
CPU clu�* is
td
VAI:'j
W?rali Centir
;WCAINI BLVD
j,50
in
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity Crash Severity Count % Inpry i5evere) 2 1 BIS',189,
4 3 - Injiry IOthe- Vstble)
4 - injury (Complaint of Pa ri)
z 2 F
ratai 2 - Iny,;ry (Severe] 2 - Irvury (Other 4 - Injury visible) (C-,mplaiht &
Painl
Crash Severity
Pvin%
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
45 Mr 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 0 20 City of Yucaipa
C
Victim Role
Number of Victims by Victim Role
2 - 3-
Passenger Pneestnan
0 _ - 0 3 -
i r. - No., 0.ui

7.2 Recommendations:
rye
gar.,
Victim Role
Count ..
- Driver
'2 7C.597,:
2 - Fassenaer
•. 2353'%
3-Pedestrian
4 - 91cyclis:
0 0 �30111:
_ - 02her
0 0.0011C
Based upon the reviewed information, Segment No. 14 does not appear to fall within the applicable school -zone limits or school -zone approach limits associated with Chapman Heights Elementary School as identified under AB 382. Furthermore, the segment appears to be located beyond the generator distances identified within the California MUTCD.

Therefore, no modifications are recommended under AB 382. While the segment experienced severe injury and pedestrian -involved collisions during the reviewed 5-year TIMS period, additional evaluation under AB 1014 may be considered as part of a broader corridor review if warranted by future safety analyses.

8. 11t' Street, 12' Street, 13t' Street, Chapman Heights Road, and Yucaipa Boulevard — Roadway Segments Adjacent to Yucaipa High School 11th Street, 12th Street, 13th Street, Chapman Heights Road, and Yucaipa Boulevard are roadway segments located adjacent to and within the vicinity of Yucaipa High School. The segments reviewed include Segment No. 16 on 11 th Street: Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue D, Segment No. 17 on 12th Street: Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E, Segment No. 18 on 13th Street: Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E, Segment No. 49 on Chapman Heights Road from Sand Canyon Road to 10th Street, and Segment No. 96 on Yucaipa Boulevard from Sand Canyon Road to Oak Glen Road. The Segments studies with their corresponding existing posted speed limits are shown below. (0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
46 SIWITPEED 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 5PEE
/ 20
20 City of Yucaipa
r i
:r 4 ' 'fF s-f +► �,%
•� ,
♦ f -. ! (�.��I F SPEED ' ♦� H
�, «. k � .' �� -yy:� LIMIT ♦ 8•• p. SPEED LIMIT - •.,�. � \'/� Ik• t
Jr
is - - • • �' t -" Fa�i- i� �tf h �" `� ' - %`?`'J!� �. `�"� '. � '. -' t� - ► --� -per. - •>M•. - i' � t=� � -1` �i �� r. � 'T'��r 11th Street is located within the vicinity of Yucaipa High School and currently has a posted speed limit of 30-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential and commercial land uses. No school -related signs, school pavement markings, bicycle lanes, marked crosswalks, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 16 of 11 th Street from Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue D was determined to be 30- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/Commercial and the 85th percentile speed was 34-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified no reported crashes within Segment No 16.

8.1 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, portions of 11 th Street appear to fall within the 500-foot to 1,000-foot school -zone approach area associated with Yucaipa High School.

Therefore, a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment may be considered consistent with the provisions of AB 382.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
47 SCNO°L
�P"° 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 L�M�r �i�
za 20 City of Yucaipa /
Appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques should be installed at appropriate locations in accordance with the California MUTCD.

No further modifications are recommended under AB 1014 as no reported crashes were identified within the reviewed 5-year TIMS collision history. 92th Street is located adjacent to Yucaipa High School and currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with predominantly residential land uses. Existing school -related treatments include marked crosswalks, school pavement markings, an existing 25-MPH when children are present school -zone speed limit sign, and a speed feedback sign. No school crossing signs were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 17 of 12th Street from Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E was determined to be 35- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/School and the 85th percentile speed was 39-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified five reported crashes within Segment No. 17, including one severe injury collision and two vehicle/pedestrian collisions. Three pedestrians were identified within the reviewed collision data.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
48 SPEED LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20 City of Yucaipa
:� bai hli-r�
r D 3uild my
0 ? � S
YucalGa hlya �
Sc4^ol _
gr IT r_t,
J% TN:I:yOT'�
_AGLE eOth- CN
YUCAI 1ILVDj
• lI
.I
Z I • 11
1 $ / 1
6 r 1 • 1I
/AVCIIJ_ D
~ ,I S
I?unlap Fl nmoNary
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
AIVII
I;Vy iSeverel 3 • In;ury (Other 4 - Injure
Visible) IComplaim et
Pain!
Crash Severity
Number of Victims by Victim Role
3 1-Dn;er .-
PasS^_ryer Pee estrlan 'ni�rry
Par-.y
Victim Role
• ' - L`:;w_• • _ _..::use •s - ('c�caGa^ • R Eky_II
• 5 - O?i�o' ! 6 L;_.. urcn Party
4 e4 4
O
Crash Severity Count %
ra:al c o.00s,
2 - Iri-ry 1severei t 20.Q0".:
3-:np_ry lQtner 'Visible! 3 63.00"6
.. -iL-^, iCorrplaol of F3 n) 1 MCIT:

Victim Role
Count .,
- Drive.
1 16 67.E
=-Fasenccr
_ 33.33,':
3 --e7estn,n
3 Sp,041.1e
4 - Bicvclls:

C O,GJ7:

B -Other
C B.GO".;
(0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
49 IIM TD 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 o
20 City of Yucaipa

8.2 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, Segment No. 17 appears to fall within the school - zone limits associated with Yucaipa High School. Additionally, the segment is also located adjacent to Dunlap Elementary School and serves both educational facilities.

According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to update the existing school -zone treatment from 25-MPH when children are present to 20-MPH when children are present.

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Additionally, due to the documented severe injury collision and pedestrian -involved collisions identified within the reviewed TIMS collision data, the segment may warrant further evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7.
13th Street is located adjacent to Yucaipa High School and currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with predominantly residential land uses. Existing roadway features include marked crosswalks. No school - related signs, school pavement markings, bicycle lanes, school crossing signs, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 18 of 13th Street from Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E was determined to be 35- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/Commercial and the 85th percentile speed was 40-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified twelve reported crashes within Segment No 18. No fatal or severe injury collisions were identified. One bicyclist was identified within the reviewed collision data.

8.3 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, portions of 13th Street appear to fall within the school -zone limits associated with Yucaipa High School. According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to establish a 20-MPH school -zone speed limit within the applicable school -zone limits.

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Appropriate school warning signs, school crossing signs, and supplemental plaques should also be installed as necessary to clearly define the school -zone limits. (0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
6111

SPEED 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382" LIMIT
20 20 City of Yucaipa
Chapman Heights Road is located within the vicinity of Yucaipa High School and currently has a posted speed limit of 40-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent commercial, institutional, and park -related land uses. Existing roadway features include marked crosswalks and bicycle lanes. No school -related signs, school crossing signs, school pavement markings, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 49 of Chapman Heights Road from Sand Canyon Road to 10th Street was determined to be 40-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential/School/Open Space and the 85th percentile speed was 50-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet.

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified four reported crashes within Segment No. 49. No fatal, severe injury, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist - involved collisions were identified.

8.4 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, the portion of Chapman Heights Road between 13th Street and the applicable 500-foot school -zone limits associated with Yucaipa High School may be considered for implementation of a 20-MPH school -zone speed limit in accordance with AB 382.

Additionally, Chapman Heights Road from Sand Canyon Road to 13th Street, as well as portions extending beyond the school -zone limits but remaining within the 500-foot to 1,000-foot school -zone approach area, may be considered for implementation of a 25- MPH school -zone approach treatment consistent with the provisions of AB 382.

Appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, school crossing signs, and supplemental plaques should be installed at appropriate locations in accordance with the California MUTCD.

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data did not identify fatal, severe injury, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist -involved collisions warranting further consideration under AB 1014.

Yucaipa Boulevard is located directly adjacent to Yucaipa High School and currently has a posted speed limit of 40-MPH with an existing 25-MPH when children are present school -zone speed limit. Existing roadway features include marked crosswalks, bicycle lanes, school pavement markings, and school crossing signs with supplemental crossing plaques. No flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 96 of Yucaipa Boulevard from Sand Canyon Road to Oak Glen Road was determined to be 40-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be (0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
51 sENoa . -
SPEED �''
LINii 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 z0 20 City of Yucaipa
Business/Commercial/School and the 85th percentile speed was 44-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified forty-four reported crashes within Segment No. 96, including one fatal collision, two severe injury collisions, three vehicle/pedestrian collisions, five pedestrian victims, and two bicyclists. — n p
Y ( Yal:.y
M1•K NUGM1,1 RG — m •MI <IUR
P ,�i �., •� � ,'.` . 1Lt cIt�R_.��.: • � � � • i ��CM1t PA'I.vD• �� • •
40,
`
y
•
(A!urIOT GR
Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
30 20
G 1C
to ��C -M - It--. I_
In-ury (tither 4 - Injury
Visible! (Complaint of
Pain)
Crash severity
• .�._, _ _. _ _, • _ ._ PJ;n_ ..^,IU';_; • 'I Ccmpaln: of PE,) Number of Victims by Victim Role
6l;
pr
I-_rlu, 2- 3- --Other 6-Nrn-
Ps.sonaer Pnde.tr,an injured
Party
Victim Role
• - _ _ _ • 3 - i=ccesn'ia� • n - 8icycls:
• .._ .-a rtv
•
0 Crash Severity Count ..
2-I1j.r,, So -re) 2. 4.55',
3 - mlury (Other Visible! 17 38.64.,Z
4 - !nlury 1Con-plaint of Pam) 24 54.55P'.

Victim Role
Count
,.
- E", c-
39 57.24'-:.
12 vctls:
2 3.43._
5 -Other
C

0.00"-:

GMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
52 LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20 City of Yucaipa

8.5 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, Segment No. 96 appears to fall entirely within the school -zone limits associated with Yucaipa High School. According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to update the existing school -zone treatment from 25-MPH when children are present to 20-MPH when children are present.

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Additionally, due to the documented fatal collision, severe injury collisions, pedestrian involvement, bicyclist involvement, and existing school -related activity identified within the reviewed TIMS collision data, the segment warrants additional evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7 to determine whether additional speed management measures are appropriate.
• .. �r• � L .� .• `�� vMl.y

9. 12t" Street, 13t' Street, Avenue D, Avenue E, and Kentucky Street - Roadway Segments Adjacent to Dunlap Elementary School
12th Street, 13th Street, Avenue D, Avenue E, and Kentucky Street are roadway segments located adjacent to and within the vicinity of Dunlap Elementary School. The segments reviewed include Segment No. 17 on 12th Street from Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E, Segment No. 18 on 13th Street from Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E, Segment No. 23 on Avenue D from 17th Street to 13th Street, Segment No. 24 on Avenue D from 13th Street to Oak Glen Road, Segment No. 26 on Avenue E from 16th Street to Oak Glen Road, and Segment No. 72 on Kentucky Street from 12th Street to Dunlap Boulevard. The Segments studies with their corresponding existing posted speed limits are shown below.
f0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 53

9CHOUL
SPEED 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 LIMIT
City of Yucaipa
,d�►. �,�.. s ' ..�.►.v-. �. , •fill
1 t i ' � , a -r• - �®� SPEED �ei' ••;, LIMITD � _rr� .. }... •", / - LIMIT ` •,®
,35.E-�y�35` ►cyi�
- ' : . SPEED • � ri®� .. .• s,�-.�1. � �i►. i%� 1,M*1� - LIMIT _ _- � � • 1. � - - SPEED � 4
- 35 T - ` LIMIT
. .. 35 '
i Dunlap Elementary Schoolir
1 r�y�� c�-- f Grp (la � � `` SPEED. �•; t tY '► � � + �'(�}1�� y'', �r V Kati Y'�-• - , `' � � +; ' � J
/r�
i.! l ..`�/...
12th Street is located adjacent to Dunlap Elementary School and within close proximity to Yucaipa High School. Segment No. 17 currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH with an existing school -zone speed limit of 25-MPH when children are present. Existing roadway features include marked crosswalks, school pavement markings, and speed feedback signage. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential and school land uses.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 17 of 12th Street from Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E was determined to be 35- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be "Residential/School" and the 85th percentile speed was 39-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified five reported crashes within Segment No. 17, including two pedestrian -related collisions. No fatal collisions were identified.

9.1 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, Segment No. 17 falls within the school -zone limits associated with both Dunlap Elementary School and Yucaipa High School.

LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20 City of Yucaipa
The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Additionally, review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified pedestrian -related collisions within Segment No. 17. Therefore, the segment may warrant additional evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7 to determine whether additional safety improvements are appropriate.

Segment No. 18 (13th Street) was previously evaluated under the Yucaipa High School section due to its proximity to both educational facilities. The recommendations contained therein remain applicable for Dunlap Elementary School.

Avenue D is located within the vicinity of Dunlap Elementary School and includes Segment No. 23 from 17th Street to 13th Street and Segment No. 24 from 13th Street to Oak Glen Road. Both roadway segments currently have a posted speed limit of 35-MPH and consist of two-way roadways with predominantly residential land uses. No school - related signs, school crossing signs, school pavement markings, bicycle lanes, marked crosswalks, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 23 of Avenue D from 17th Street to 13th Street was determined to be 35-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be "Residential/Open Space" and the 85th percentile speed was 35-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified eight reported crashes within Segment No. 23. No fatal, severe injury, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist -involved collisions were identified.

9.2 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, portions of Segment No. 23 appear to fall within the 500-foot to 1,000-foot school -zone approach area associated with Dunlap Elementary School. Therefore, a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment may be considered consistent with the provisions of AB 382.

Appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques should be installed at appropriate locations in accordance with the California MUTCD.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 24 of Avenue D from 13th Street to Oak Glen Road was determined to be 35-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be "Residential" and the 85th percentile speed was 38-MPH. (see AppendixA for detailed segment sheet). (0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
55 �SPEED� 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20 City of Yucaipa
Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified three reported crashes within Segment No. 24, including one severe injury collision. No pedestrian -involved or bicyclist -involved collisions were identified.

9.3 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, portions of Segment No. 24 appear to fall within the 500-foot to 1,000-foot school -zone approach area associated with Dunlap Elementary School. Therefore, a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment may be considered consistent with the provisions of AB 382.

Appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques should be installed at appropriate locations in accordance with the California MUTCD.

Additionally, review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified one severe injury collision within Segment No. 24. Therefore, the segment may warrant further evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7 to determine whether additional safety improvements are appropriate.

Avenue E is located directly adjacent to Dunlap Elementary School. Segment No. 26 currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH and an existing school -zone speed limit of 25-MPH when children are present. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential and school land uses. Existing roadway features include marked crosswalks, school pavement markings, school crossing signs, supplemental SCHOOL warning signs, and a speed feedback sign. No bicycle lanes or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 26 of Avenue E from 161h Street to Oak Glen Road was determined to be 35-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be "Residential/School" and the 85th percentile speed was 39-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified fourteen reported crashes within Segment No. 26, including one severe injury collision, one pedestrian -involved collision, and two bicyclist -involved collisions. 0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
56 io � SPEED
LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 City of Yucaipa
AVENUZ 0
li
KEL_! Lr-
•
Kcr4lut" S-.
44 Number of Crashes by Crash Severity
Crash Severity
Count
10 ' -Fatal
0 0_C'107:
8 2 - injury iSe,-,2re'
1 7.145,
3 - Injury ?Other V.sible7
9 64.29"'
IC=.P13117.-. Ot 1`31n)
1 28.57'."
1 2
Fzi-,a-Injury (Severe; ln;ury (Other 4 - Injury
Visible; (COM.Plaint C*
Pain!
Crash Severity
2A I P fO* tee 5 b 6 • 4 - l.;1','!C:1rP!a,-,!
Number of Victims by Victim Role Victlin Role Count %
Drive.- 12 75.00Y

6.25",
Pedestrian 1 6.259,
0-her 0 1001%
4-Bicyclist 5-Other 6 - Ncn-
injured
Party
VkVin Role
•
1 - Drive' • 2 - PaSscrqo, 0 3 Pc"eSlna' • .1 - q;c'L!is:
• 5 - Oinor S 6 - No-insuroo Pa,ly.

9.4 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, Segment No. 26 falls within the school -zone limits associated with Dunlap Elementary School. According to the aforementioned CVC (0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
57 SPEE 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 1 LIMIT 20 20 City of Yucaipa
sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to update the existing school - zone treatment from 25-MPH when children are present to 20-MPH when children are present.

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Additionally, review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified a severe injury collision, pedestrian involvement, and bicyclist involvement within Segment No. 26. Therefore, the segment may warrant additional evaluation under AB 1014 and CVC §22358.7 to determine whether additional speed management measures or safety improvements are appropriate.

Kentucky Street is located within the vicinity of Dunlap Elementary School. Segment No. 72 currently has a recommended speed limit of 35-MPH and functions as a one- way roadway. Adjacent land uses include residential, commercial, institutional, and park -related uses. No school -related signs, school crossing signs, school pavement markings, bicycle lanes, marked crosswalks, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 72 of Kentucky Street from 12th Street to Dunlap Boulevard was determined to be 35-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be "Residential/Commercial/School" and the 85th percentile speed was 37-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified six reported crashes within Segment No. 72, including one severe injury collision. No pedestrian - involved or bicyclist -involved collisions were identified.

9.5 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, Segment No. 72 does not appear to fall within the school -zone limits or school -zone approach area associated with Dunlap Elementary School as defined under AB 382. Therefore, no modifications to the existing speed limit are recommended under the provisions of AB 382.

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified one severe injury collision within Segment No. 72. However, no pedestrian -involved or bicyclist - involved collisions were identified. Therefore, the segment does not appear to warrant school -zone speed -limit modifications and should remain subject to the recommendations contained within the 2023 Citywide E&TS unless future conditions warrant additional evaluation.

E0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 58

SCM°OL
2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 /ice LIMIT
City of Yucaipa �' �/'�

10. Avenue H, Fremont Street, and Mesa Grande Drive - Roadway Segments Adjacent to Wildwood Elementary School and Green Valley High School Avenue H, Fremont Street, and Mesa Grande Drive are roadway segments located adjacent to and within the vicinity of Wildwood Elementary School and Green Valley High School. The segments reviewed include Segment No. 32 on Avenue H from Bryant Street to Holmes Street, Segment No. 67 on Fremont Street from Avenue H to County Line Road and Segment No. 74 on Mesa Grande Drive from Wildwood Canyon Road to County Line Road. The Segments studies with their corresponding existing posted speed limits are shown below.
i*`/' �tw r++ ♦+ F_y 14Lw1,1t !•'i! \R' 1 1 `ai Gr . i�� iV N X ► 77?1 7.. �'t r
_ Wildwood Elementary School
Green Valley High School
I i\'7 ` ,1e�_ :.1;• fit.-'w•e�. .. .Z -'`'��
��;i•~�'' SPEED
1 �� LIMIT ,- ` ._-1;\ t ! •";' L• .J'�1�
Te
-
.. � w.�lt �: _ J .�, l+• �, C LIMIT a ,,t,,�,,� 'w�
f i firIP
r
Avenue H is located adjacent to Wildwood Elementary School. Segment No. 32 currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH and includes an existing school -zone speed limit of 25-MPH when children are present. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential and school land uses. Existing roadway features include marked crosswalks and school crossing signs. No bicycle lanes, school pavement markings, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 32 of Avenue H from Bryant Street to Holmes Street was determined to be 35-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be "Residential/School" and the 85th percentile speed was 42-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet). 10 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
59 D
2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 \20 City of Yucaipa
Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified one reported crash within Segment No. 32. No fatal, severe injury, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist - involved collisions were identified.

10.1 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, Segment No. 32 falls within the school -zone limits associated with Wildwood Elementary School. According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to update the existing school -zone treatment from 25-MPH when children are present to 20-MPH when children are present.

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified one reported collision within Segment No. 32. No fatal, severe injury, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist - involved collisions were identified. Therefore, no additional speed modifications are recommended under AB 1014 at this time.

Fremont Street is located within the vicinity of Wildwood Elementary School and Green Valley High School. Segment No. 67 currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH and consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential land uses. No bicycle lanes, marked crosswalks, school signage, school crossing signs, school pavement markings, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 67 of Fremont Street from Avenue H to County Line Road was determined to be 35- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be "Residential" and the 85th percentile speed was 37-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data did not identify any reported crashes within Segment No. 67.

10.2 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, Segment No. 67 does not appear to fall within the school -zone limits or school -zone approach area associated with Wildwood Elementary School or Green Valley High School as defined under AB 382. Therefore, no modifications to the existing speed limit are recommended under the provisions of AB 382.

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data did not identify any reported crashes within Segment No. 67. Therefore, no additional evaluation under AB 1014 is recommended at this time.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
60 r-
SPCED 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 MIT r 1
20 20 City of Yucaipa
Mesa Grande Drive is located within the vicinity of Wildwood Elementary School and Green Valley High School. Segment No. 74 currently has a posted speed limit of 40- MPH and consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential and park -related land uses. Existing roadway features include bicycle lanes. No marked crosswalks, school signage, school crossing signs, school pavement markings, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 74 of Mesa Grande Drive from Wildwood Canyon Road to County Line Road was determined to be 40-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be "Residential/Parks" and the 85th percentile speed was 42-MPH. (see Appendix for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified three reported crashes within Segment No. 74. No fatal, severe injury, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist -involved collisions were identified.

10.3 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, portions of Segment No. 74 appear to fall within the 500-foot to 1,000-foot school -zone approach area associated with Wildwood Elementary School. Therefore, a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment may be considered consistent with the provisions of AB 382.

The portion of Mesa Grande Drive located within the applicable school -zone approach area, generally between Village Road and the limits of the 1,000-foot school -zone boundary, may be considered for implementation of a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment subject to field verification.

Appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques should be installed at appropriate locations in accordance with the California MUTCD.

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified three reported crashes within Segment No. 74. However, no fatal, severe injury, pedestrian - involved, or bicyclist -involved collisions were identified. Therefore, no additional evaluation under AB 1014 is recommended at this time.

11. County Line Road — Roadway Segments Adjacent to Mesa Grande Academy
County Line Road is a roadway segment located within the vicinity of Mesa Grande Academy. The segment reviewed includes Segment No. 54 on County Line Road from Bryant Street to Mesa Grande Drive. The Segments studies with their corresponding existing posted speed limits are shown below.
0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
61 SCHOOL
�SPEED 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 LIMIT � r�1 ,- 20 City of Yucaipa P'0
. . ,� r � r.;: a ..�.�11-Z ' ••- { � �7 r� rr�•r�• +�'' J� .►� Ir
�♦ ��'�a,+♦7/<,,
!}♦fir �- h �.�� 7► i•n'"` .1j �A Tel`?�o t3
it `► , r;� ��.a r 7,i"�� , �' �'�' �'' .. � fir .., sC �'� I �.. . } �'!// )

1. _ � ��, �"• �., �p {J(f ., a i s jl`��--� �+�. �. �f�:' i� Xik,*'r( 4 ails-;ti�:.�i.i��
. ice. • . ,1
�; � i
�iL► Mesa Grande Academy
_ ►. � . - •tip �l �. " $�� ;�� '
_.7
ILVA
County Line Road currently has a no posted post and consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential land uses. No bicycle lanes, marked crosswalks, school signage, school crossing signs, school pavement markings, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 54 of County Line Road from Bryant Street to Mesa Grande Drive was determined to be 40-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be "Residential" and the 85th percentile speed was 43-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified four reported crashes within Segment No. 54. No fatal, severe injury, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist - involved collisions were identified.

11.1 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, portions of Segment No. 54 appear to fall within the 500-foot to 1,000-foot school -zone approach area associated with Mesa Grande Academy. Therefore, a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment may be considered consistent with the provisions of AB 382.

The portion of County Line Road located within the applicable school -zone approach area associated with Mesa Grande Academy may be considered for implementation of MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
62 SCN°°L
20 20
"`° 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 L�M�T
City of Yucaipa
a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment, subject to field verification of the applicable school -zone boundaries.

Appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques should be installed at appropriate locations in accordance with the California MUTCD.

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified four reported crashes within Segment No. 54. However, no fatal, severe injury, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist -involved collisions were identified. Therefore, no additional evaluation under AB 1014 is recommended at this time.

12. Fir Avenue, Oak Glen Road, and Sunnyside Drive - Roadway Segments Adjacent to Park View Middle School and Ridgeview Elementary School Fir Avenue, Oak Glen Road, and Bryant Street are roadway segments located adjacent to and within the vicinity of Park View Middle School and Ridgeview Elementary School.

The segments reviewed include Segment No. 63 on Fir Avenue from Bryant Street to Sunnyside Drive, Segment No. 79 on Oak Glen Road from Bryant Street to 5th Street, and Segment No. 86 on Sunnyside Drive from Oak Glen Road to Bryant Street. The Segments studies with their corresponding existing posted speed limits are shown below.
0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 63

SPEED LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 2'0 20 City of Yucaipa
�,}�• SPEED
LIMIJ.

T
r f o
SPEED
LIMIT
Ilk
ry School
w �i 1• rf• A
I �Tt rr °°f _, ►ti/
r
N�
Fir Avenue is located within the vicinity of Ridgeview Elementary School and Park View Middle School. Segment No. 63 currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH and consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential land uses. No bicycle lanes, school signage, school crossing signs, school pavement markings, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery. The segment is located within the school - zone approach area associated with Ridgeview Elementary School.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 63 of Fir Avenue from Bryant Street to Sunnyside Drive was determined to be 35- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential and the 85th percentile speed was 37-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified four reported crashes within Segment No. 63. The reported collisions consisted primarily of broadside collisions. No fatal, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist -involved collisions were identified. 0111, MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
64 �2`
2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 City of Yucaipa

12.1 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, portions of Segment No. 63 appear to fall within the 500-foot to 1,000-foot school -zone approach area associated with Ridgeview Elementary School. Therefore, a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment may be considered consistent with the provisions of AB 382.

Appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques should be installed at appropriate locations in accordance with the California MUTCD.

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified four reported crashes within Segment No. 63. However, no fatal, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist - involved collisions were identified. Therefore, no additional evaluation under AB 1014 is recommended at this time.

Oak Glen Road is located within the vicinity of Park View Middle School and Ridgeview Elementary School. Segment No. 79 currently has a posted speed limit of 45-MPH and consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent residential and park -related land uses.

Existing roadway features include marked crosswalks and bicycle lanes. The segment is located within the school -zone approach area associated with Park View Middle School and Ridgeview Elementary School and provides access via Sunnyside Drive.

Yucaipa Community Park is located adjacent to the roadway and generates pedestrian activity within the area.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 79 of Oak Glen Road from Bryant Street to 5th Street was determined to be 45- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential and the 85th percentile speed was 48-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified twelve reported crashes within Segment No. 79. No fatal collisions were identified.

12.2 Recommendations:

Based upon the reviewed information, portions of Segment No. 79 appear to fall within the 500-foot to 1,000-foot school -zone approach area associated with Park View Middle School and Ridgeview Elementary School. Therefore, a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment may be considered consistent with the provisions of AB 382.

The portion of Oak Glen Road located generally in the vicinity of Sunnyside Drive, where access to both schools is provided and pedestrian activity is anticipated, may be considered for implementation of a 25-MPH school -zone approach treatment subject to field verification.

Appropriate school warning signs, speed limit signs, and supplemental plaques should be installed at appropriate locations in accordance with the California MUTCD.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 65

SPEED 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 LIMIT
City of Yucaipa
Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified twelve reported crashes within Segment No. 79. Therefore, the segment may warrant continued monitoring for potential safety improvements.

Sunnyside Drive is located adjacent to Park View Middle School and Ridgeview Elementary School. Segment No. 86 currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH and includes an existing school -zone speed limit of 25-MPH when children are present.

Existing roadway features include marked crosswalks, school crossing signs, speed feedback signage, and traffic -calming speed humps. No bicycle lanes or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 86 of Sunnyside Drive from Oak Glen Road to Bryant Street was determined to be 25-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential and the 85th percentile speed was 28-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified four reported crashes within Segment No. 86. No fatal, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist -involved collisions were identified.

12.3 Recommendations: Based upon the reviewed information, Segment No. 86 falls within the school -zone limits associated with Park View Middle School and Ridgeview Elementary School. According to the aforementioned CVC sections under the new AB 382, the recommendation is to update the existing school -zone treatment from 25-MPH when children are present to 20-MPH when children are present.

The recommendation includes installation of S4-1 (CA) & S4-5 at appropriate locations as per the new CA MUTCD (Effective January 18, 2026).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified four reported crashes within Segment No. 86. However, no fatal, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist - involved collisions were identified. Therefore, no additional evaluation under AB 1014 is recommended at this time.

13. Campus Drive and Sand Canyon Road —Roadway Segments Adjacent to Crafton Hills College
Campus Drive and Sand Canyon Road are roadway segments located adjacent to and within the vicinity of Crafton Hills College. The segments reviewed include Segment No. 47 on Campus Drive from Sand Canyon Road to U Bend, Segment No. 48 on Campus Drive from U Bend to Sand Canyon Road, and Segment No. 85 on Sand Canyon Road from North City Limits to Yucaipa Boulevard. The Segments studies with their corresponding existing posted speed limits are shown below.

Review of the 2023 Citywide Engineering &
information associated with Segment No. 4'
Bend) and Segment No. 48 (Campus Drive
Traffic Survey indicates that the speed -limit
(Campus Drive: Sand Canyon Road to U
U Bend to Sand Canyon Road) appears to
(0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
66 SPEED
LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20 City of Yucaipa
be switched within the summary table. Based upon review of the most recently available aerial and street -level imagery, Segment No. 47 is posted at 25-MPH, while Segment No. 48 is posted at 35-MPH. Accordingly, the roadway descriptions and recommendations contained in this document utilize the field -observed posted speed limits in order to accurately reflect existing conditions adjacent to Crafton Hills College.

SPEED ► - i
LIMIT
r.

Crafton Hill College

4. r
Campus Drive is located adjacent to Crafton Hills College and currently has a posted speed limit of 25-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent open space and institutional land uses. Existing roadway features include pedestrian warning signage, a raised speed table, and accessible pedestrian crossing facilities. No bicycle lanes or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 47 of Campus Drive from Sand Canyon Road to U Bend was determined to be 25- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be College and the 85th percentile speed was 29-MPH. Due to limited sight distance, grade, and high pedestrian activity associated with the college campus, the posted speed limit was established at 25-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified no reported crashes within Segment No. 47.
0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 67

SPEED LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20 City of Yucaipa

13.1 Recommendations:

Since Crafton Hills College is a post -secondary educational institution and not a K-12 school, the provisions of AB 382 are not applicable to Segment No. 47. Therefore, no school -zone speed limit modifications are recommended under AB 382.

No further modifications are recommended under AB 1014 as no reported crashes were identified within the reviewed 5-year TIMS collision history.

Campus Drive is located adjacent to Crafton Hills College and currently has a posted speed limit of 35-MPH. The roadway consists of a two-way roadway with adjacent open space and institutional land uses. Existing roadway features include traffic -calming speed tables. A pedestrian crossing was observed at the intersection of Campus Drive and Sand Canyon Road. No bicycle lanes, school -related signage, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 48 of Campus Drive from U Bend to Sand Canyon Road was determined to be 35- MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be College and the 85th percentile speed was 43-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).

Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified no reported crashes within Segment No. 48.

13.2 Recommendations:

Since Crafton Hills College is a post -secondary educational institution and not a K-12 school, the provisions of AB 382 are not applicable to Segment No. 48. Therefore, no school -zone speed limit modifications are recommended under AB 382.

No further modifications are recommended under AB 1014 as no reported crashes were identified within the reviewed 5-year TIMS collision history.

Sand Canyon Road is located within the vicinity of Crafton Hills College and currently has a posted speed limit of 50-MPH. The roadway does not consist of a two-way roadway and includes adjacent residential, commercial, and institutional land uses.

Existing roadway features include bicycle lanes. No school -related signage, school pavement markings, or flashing beacons were observed within the reviewed imagery.

Under the previous 2023 Citywide E&TS, the established speed limit across Segment No. 85 of Sand Canyon Road from North City Limits to Yucaipa Boulevard was determined to be 50-MPH, as the adjacent land use was found to be Residential, Commercial, and Institutional and the 85th percentile speed was 45-MPH. (see Appendix A for detailed segment sheet).
0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
68 5CN801
SPEED 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 MIT
'20 20 City of Yucaipa ?10
Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified twelve reported crashes within Segment No. 85. No fatal, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist - involved collisions were identified.

13.3 Recommendations:

Since Crafton Hills College is a post -secondary educational institution and not a K-12 school, the provisions of AB 382 are not applicable to Segment No. 85. Therefore, no school -zone speed limit modifications are recommended under AB 382. Review of the most recently available 5-year TIMS collision data identified twelve reported crashes within Segment No. 85. However, no fatal, pedestrian -involved, or bicyclist -involved collisions were identified. Therefore, no additional evaluation under AB 1014 is recommended at this time.

14. Conclusion:

Pursuant to Assembly Bill 382 and the California Vehicle Code, the City has the discretionary authority, by ordinance or resolution, to establish a 20-MPH prima facie speed limit within designated school zones. AB 382 expressly authorizes this action without requiring the preparation of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, provided that the school zone limits are properly established and signed in accordance with the California MUTCD. Accordingly, the City may apply AB 382 within school zones as it deems appropriate to enhance safety, independent of prevailing speed data or traditional speed -zoning requirements.
(0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
69 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 LIMIT
City of Yucaipa
Resources & References

1. AB 382 — Pedestrian safety: school zones: speed limits.

Bill Text: CA AB382 1 2025-2026 1 Regular Session I Chaptered I LegiScan

2. AB 1014 —Traffic safety: speed limits.

Bill Text: CA AB1014 1 2025-2026 1 Regular Session I Chaptered I LegiScan

3. CVC § 22358.7 — Speed Limits
California Code, VEH 22358.7.

4. CVC § 22352, 22352.5 — School Zone Speed
California Code, VEH 22352. & California Code, VEH 22352.5.

5. CA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 2026
CA MUTCD 2026

6. Minagar & Associates, Inc., 2023 Citywide Yucaipa Engineering & Traffic Survey Report, January 5, 2024.
(0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
70 SPEED 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 LIMIT 20 City of Yucaipa
Appendix A:
2023 Yucaipa Citywide Engineering & Traffic Survey Report Segment Summary Sheets
Segment 1 2nd Street: Date Avenue to Yucaipa Boulevard
➢ Segment 3 3rd Street: Date Avenue to Yucaipa Boulevard Segment 5 3rd Street: Wildwood Canyon Road to County Line Road ➢ Segment 7 5th Street: Oak Glen Road to Yucaipa Boulevard Segment 10 6th Street: Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E
Segment 12 7th Street: Yucaipa Boulevard to Enoch Avenue Segment 13 8th Street: Liberty Road to Avenue E
Segment 14 10th Street: Chapman Heights Road to Yucaipa Boulevard ➢ Segment 16 11th Street: Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue D ➢ Segment 17 12th Street: Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E ➢ Segment 18 13th Street: Yucaipa Boulevard to Avenue E Segment 23 Avenue D: 17th Street to 13th Street
Segment 24 Avenue D: 13th Street to Oak Glen Road
Segment 26 Avenue E: 16th Street to Oak Glen Road
Segment 28 Avenue E: 8th Street to California Street
➢ Segment 29 Avenue E: California Street to Fremont Street Segment 31 Avenue H: 2nd Street to Bryant Street
➢ Segment 32 Avenue H: Bryant Street to Holmes Street
➢ Segment 37 Bryant Street: Yucaipa Boulevard to Wildwood Canyon Road ➢ Segment 41 California Street: Avenue B to Avenue E
➢ Segment 42 California St: Avenue E to Wildwood Canyon Road ➢ Segment 44 California Street: Avenue H to County Line Road ➢ Segment 47 Campus Drive: Sand Canyon Road to U Bend
➢ Segment 48 Campus Drive: U Bend to Sand Canyon Road
➢ Segment 49 Chapman Heights Road: Sand Canyon Road to 10th Street 0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
71 _ sPEO
LIMIT 2026 School Zone Speed Limits Under New California AB 382 20 20 City of Yucaipa
y Segment 50 Chapman Heights Road: 10th Street to Oak Glen Road r Segment 53 County Line Road: 3rd Street to Bryant Street r Segment 54 County Line Road: Bryant Street to Mesa Grande Drive )- Segment 63 Fir Avenue: Bryant Street to Sunnyside Drive Segment 67 Fremont Street: Avenue H to County Line Road Segment 72 Kentucky Street: 12th Street to Dunlap Boulevard Segment 74 Mesa Grande Drive: Wildwood Canyon Road to County Line Road y Segment 79 Oak Glen Road: Bryant Street to 5th Street Y Segment 80 Oak Glen Road: 5th Street to Yucaipa Boulevard Segment 85 Sand Canyon Road: North City Limits to Yucaipa Boulevard Segment 86 Sunnyside Drive: Oak Glen Road to Bryant Street y Segment 88 Washington Drive: 9th Street to 7th Street Segment 96 Yucaipa Boulevard: Sand Canyon Road to Oak Glen Road Segment 97 Yucaipa Boulevard: Oak Glen Road to 5th Street Segment 98 Yucaipa Boulevard: 5th Street to 2nd Street
(0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
72 ATTACHMENT 3

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING

AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS)

UPDATE - PHASE II FOR

SELECTED ROADWAY

SEGMENTS

YUCAIPA, CA
PREPARED FOR:

PREPARED BY:

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Traffic/Civil/Electrical Engineering - ITS - Transportation Planning - CEM JURY 15, 2026

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS)

UPDATE FOR SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS
I, Fred Minagar do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Yucaipa was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional Civil Engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices CA MUTCD 2026, effective January 18, 2026. Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of existing traffic conditions collected and measured in the field on City of Yucaipa roadways.

Fred Minagar, MS, RCE, PE, FITE, RSA, Registration No. 53466 Project Manager
b A?SOC/
VpP.��rrca,��41�
Z
' tr
5FA1.

- 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SAEE° EAF°ACE°
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS eY
J' CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA AA°Afl

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 — Executive Summary ...................................................................................... 2 — Background/Discussion.............................................................................. 3 — Current Regulations..................................................................................... 4 — Speed Zoning Principles............................................................................. 5 - Methodology.................................................................................................... 6 — Engineering & Traffic Survey Results and Recommendations......... 7 — Applicable Vehicle Codes........................................................................... 8 - References.......................................................................................................

LIST OF APPENDICES
................... 5
................... 7
..............................
8 ..............................
9 ............................11
Appendix A: 2026 Updated Citywide E&TS Map of Recommended Speed Limits Appendix B: 2023 Citywide E&TS Map of Recommended Speed Limits Appendix C: Summary of Recommended Changes to Posted Speed Limits Appendix D: Roadway Segment Analysis of Factors Not Readily Apparent and Traffic Data Summary Sheets
Appendix E: Radar Speed Survey Sheets
Appendix F: 24-Hour Machine Counts (ADT) Traffic Volume Data Appendix G: Speed Gun Calibration Certification
4 i' MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

- 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED '- ENFORCED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS RADAR
CITY OF YUCAIPA. CA
1 — Executive Summary
This report provides an update to the City of Yucaipa's Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) for selected roadway segments throughout the City. The study includes the reevaluation of eight (8) roadway segments previously analyzed under the 2023 Citywide Engineering & Traffic Survey and the addition of three (3) new roadway segments not previously evaluated. The Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) was conducted by Minagar & Associates, Inc. and was requested by the City of Yucaipa to provide updated traffic engineering data, validate existing posted speed limits, and evaluate the need for any modifications to currently established speed zones.

Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. In accordance with the latest relevant sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD Rev. 9, effective January 18, 2026), and Federal Highway Administration Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (FHWA MUTCD, 11 th Edition Rev. 1, Dec. 2025), the E&TS must consider, at a minimum, the following contributing factors toward the establishment of appropriate posted speed limits:
1) Analysis of prevailing speeds, as determined by traffic engineering measurements 2) Analysis of collision records for the most recent available January 1, 2021 — December 31, 2025 period
3) Other highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to drivers.

When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local
authorities may consider factors such as roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation,
shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection
spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, pedestrian and bicyclist safety, the 10-MPH pace range of prevailing traffic, roadside development and environment, parking practices, and the density of adjacent residential and/or business frontage.

The findings of this E&TS reveal that eight (8) of the eleven (11) surveyed roadway segments are recommended to
remain at their currently established posted speed limits as documented. Based upon the collected speed survey data, collision history, traffic volume counts, roadway
characteristics, and surrounding land use conditions, three (3) roadway segments are recommended for a decrease
in the existing posted speed limit. The recommended
roadway segments to be decreased include Segment No.
36 on Bryant Street from Date Avenue to Yucaipa
Boulevard from 45 MPH to 40 MPH, Segment No. 78 on
Oak Glen Road from Cherry Croft/Jefferson Street to
The findings of this EBTS reveal
that eight (8) of the eleven (11)
surveyed roadway segments are
recommended to remain at their
currently established posted
speed limits as documented.

Three (3) roadway segments of
Bryant Street from Date Ave to
Yucaipa Blvd from 45 MPH to 40
MPH, Oak Glen Rd from Cherry
CroWJefferson St to Bryant St
from 50 MPH to 45 MPH, and
Wildwood Canyon Rd from
Bryant St to Holmes St from 45
MPH to 40 MPH are
recommended for a decrease in
the existing posted speed limit.

Three (3) newly evaluated
roadway segments on Colorado
St are recommended to be
posted at 35 MPH.
�'; MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 5

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED / /,Ill ENFDACED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA flADAfl
Bryant Street from 50 MPH to 45 MPH, and Segment No. 91 on Wildwood Canyon Road from Bryant Street to Holmes Street from 45 MPH to 40 MPH. Additionally, the three newly evaluated Colorado Street segments are recommended to be posted at 35 MPH.

The following list summarizes the findings of the E&TS and categorizes street segments which are recommended to maintain, increase, or decrease their existing posted speed:

Summary of Proposed 11 Speed Limits
19 - 13th Street
Ave E
to
Oak Glen Rd
35 MPH
25 - Avenue E
Yucaipa Blvd
to
16th St
35 MPH
77 - Oak Glen Road
Northeast City Limits
to
Cherry Croft Dr
50 MPH
93 - Wildwood Canyon Road
Mesa Grande Dr
to
Oak Mesa Dr
45 MPH
94 - Wildwood Canyon Road
Oak Mesa Dr
to
Oak Glen Rd
45 MPH
101 Colorado Street
Wildw ood Canyon Rd
to
8th Street
35 MPH
102 Colorado Street
8th St
to
9th St
35 MPH
103 Colorado Street
9th St
to
10th St
35 MPH
36 - Bryant Street
Date Ave
to Yucaipa Blvd
45 to 40 MPH
78 - Oak Glen Road
Cherry Croft Dr/Jefferson St
to Bryant St
50 to 45 MPH
91 - Wildwood Canyon Road
Bryant St
to Holmes St
45 to 40 MPH
A summary table of proposed speed limits is provided in Appendix C and roadway segment analysis sheets, collision analysis summaries, and traffic data certification sheets supporting the recommended posted speed limits for the eleven (11) surveyed roadway segments are provided in Appendix D.

Additional supporting documentation of the survey's methodology is provided in the following sections of this report, including project background, current speed regulations, speed zoning principles, survey methodology, daily traffic volume counts, and radar spot speed survey data upon which the overall conclusions of this Engineering and Traffic Survey and recommended posted speed limits are based.

Radar speed survey sheets, 24-hour machine tube counts (ADT) data, speed gun calibration certificates are provided in Appendices E, F, & G respectively. 6 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED �'-"•.I•�= ENFORCED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS I BY

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA I
tt
2 - Background/Discussion
The California Manual on Traffic Uniform Control Devices (CAMUTCD) states that local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 7 or 14 years, in compliance with Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) to reevaluate non -statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review. Speed limits are used to both regulate and guide motorists' speed choices, and are visibly posted on the roadside as a tool to reduce the dangers that drivers might otherwise impose on road users by driving at unsafe speeds.

It is a common assumption that the posting of a speed limit sign will lead to a motorist driving at that speed; however, historical evidence and research shows that the majority of drivers will travel at roadway speeds which seem the most reasonable given the prevailing driving conditions.

Speed regulations construed as unreasonable have the potential to be disregarded by an unsafe majority of motorists; therefore, a "reasonable" speed limit is commonly one that conforms to the actual behavior of the general motoring public. Based upon this concept, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) provides the Basic Speed Law which states that:
"No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than what is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The purpose of controlling speed limits using law enforcement is not to burden motorists with unreasonable laws, but to give motorists a clear indication of the maximum driving speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions, and reflects surrounding roadway and roadside conditions which may not be apparent to drivers. Speed limits established on the basis of an E&TS provide law enforcement officers with a means to regulate the top fringe of drivers who are disposed to reckless and unreliable driving behaviors, have faulty judgment, or will otherwise not conform to the Basic Speed Law and to what the majority of drivers find to be reasonable and prudent.
i'< MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS ENFBY
RADAR

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
3 — Current Regulations
Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour (mph). All other speed limits are called prima facie limits, which "at first sight", are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Specific prima facie limits established by California law include:
70 mph - May be posted by the governing authority on the basis of an engineering and traffic study and consultation with the California Highway Patrol (CHP). 65 mph - On all streets and highways, unless otherwise posted or if prevailing conditions meet the criteria for a lower prima facie speed limit, as described below. 55 mph - On two-lane undivided highways (i.e., highways not physically divided and have no more than one lane per each direction, excluding passing lanes). 20 mph - When approaching or passing a posted "SCHOOL" zone, when children are going to and from school; in a "business district" or "residence district," as defined by the CVC; or when passing a "senior center" facility.
15 mph - In any alley; or when approaching a "blind" highway intersection or rail -highway grade crossing uncontrolled by traffic control devices (i.e., limited sight distance in advance of the uncontrolled intersection or crossing, as defined by the CVC).

In addition to the above prima facie speed limits, a local authority may declare and establish intermediate prima facie speed limits upon the basis of an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) in increments of 5 miles per hour up to 60 mph, or a maximum speed limit of 65 mph, whichever is found to be most appropriate in facilitating the orderly movement of traffic and is also reasonable and safe. E&TS provide an analysis of roadway conditions, accident records, and the prevailing speed of drivers representatively traveling the highway under study. Since unjustified speed limits can be difficult to enforce, the E&TS is essential in preventing the establishment of speed limits which are below or above what is safe, and/or what the majority of drivers consider to be reasonable for the prevailing roadway, roadside and traffic conditions.

The California Vehicle Code (CVC) states that the use of radar or other speed measuring device to enforce speed limits which have not been justified based on an E&TS constitutes a "speed trap," notwithstanding certain qualifying conditions. An E&TS is valid for up to seven (7) years if the speed measuring devices used for speed enforcement are certified and properly calibrated, and the enforcing officer has completed the required operating courses for the speed -measuring device used, per CVC 40802(c)(2)(13)(i)(1). If an E&TS was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, but a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, it is valid for up to 14 years.

Given the above requirements, the California Vehicle Code prohibits authorities from securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle based on a speed trap. Conversely, drivers who do not comply with speed limits which have been lawfully justified and posted are subject to enforcement action. See Section 7 for CVC divisions and articles pertaining to this E&TS. 8 i : MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED

ENFORCED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS aY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RwoaR
4 — Speed Zoning Principles
Driver behavioral research has
been conducted over several - CAUFORNIA
decades and finds that the �VEHICLE
_ CODE
average driver chooses their-�
driving speed based on the
appearance of the highway pp g y itself as -
v
and the prevailing traffic - ": ..
�r
conditions. Thus, the CVC and
CAMUTCD require that speed
limits be established in accordance with appropriate engineering practice and methods. The CAMUTCD provides standards, guidance and support for the preparation of engineering and traffic surveys, and requires that, at a minimum, the three following factors be considered in determining appropriate speed limits to facilitate the safe, sensible and orderly flow of traffic:
■ Prevailing speeds
■ Collision records
- Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver Prevailing Speeds
Measuring the typical speed, or prevailing speed, of existing traffic flow allows the selection of an effective speed limit based on the presumption that the majority of motorists drive at speeds that are generally safe and reasonable. Prevailing speeds are determined by conducting a radar - based spot speed survey along a particular segment and direction along a roadway to measure a sample number of vehicle speeds during generally free -flow traffic conditions. For this E&TS, radar speed surveys were conducted to collect a minimum of 100 speed samples during morning and afternoon time periods (9:00 AM — 4:00 PM).

The resulting measured speed data is organized and analyzed to extract various speed characteristics and driver trends, such as the ten -mile pace range, average speed traveled, and the 85th percentile speed. The most significant speed attribute obtained from the survey is the 85th percentile speed, or critical speed, and is defined as one (1) standard deviation above 501h percentile (average speed), or simply the free -flow speed at or below which 85% of the motorists were surveyed to be traveling. Since only 15% of the motorists exceed this value, the 85th percentile speed is normally used as an initial (presumptive) value for the updated posted speed limit, and adjusted downward or upward as other conditions necessitate. Based on current CAMUTCD guidelines and California state law, when a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5-MPH increment to the surveyed 85th percentile speed, except under the following optional conditions in which it may otherwise establish:

The posted speed may be reduced by 5 MPH from the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile speed upon due consideration for additional factors not readily apparent to i; MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II EFEE

N ORCED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA !;
the typical driver which have been appropriately justified and documented in the E&TS, and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer (see CVC §627 and 22358.5).

For cases which require rounding up the field -surveyed 851h percentile speed to the nearest 5-MPH increment (e.g., 38 MPH rounded up to 40 MPH), the selected speed limit may instead be rounded down to the nearest 5-MPH increment below the surveyed 851h percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (see CVC §21400(b)).

In accordance with CVC §40802, a "speed trap" does not apply to active and posted school zones or "local streets" as defined in the current California Road System (CRS). A local authority may therefore post an appropriately established prima facie speed limit on such roadways without requiring a recent engineering and traffic survey or determination based on the procedures set forth in §22352, §22354, §22357 or 22358.3 of the code.

Collision Records
The most recent collision data was also considered in setting appropriate speed limits. Drivers may underestimate the effects of higher speeds on crash probability and severity. An above - average collision rate, particularly due to unsafe speeding related incidents, might suggest existence of conditions which are not readily apparent to motorists; this should be considered when reevaluating the appropriate speed limit for the roadway segment.

Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
Each street segment was additionally evaluated to identify and document any roadway, roadside, traffic and other significant features which may not be readily apparent to motorists and may justify selecting a posted speed limit based on a five mile -per -hour reduction from the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile speed. Such conditions would exist where the combined influence of one or more of these factors could result in uncharacteristic or unexpected driving conditions, and in turn, affect the ability of drivers to properly judge the safest and most appropriate travel speed for a particular situation or location.

Examples of such factors include: shoulder conditions (e.g., on -street parking, closely -spaced and/or blind driveway traffic), sight distance and/or geometric constraints (e.g., narrow streets, horizontal roadway curvature, hilly grades), pedestrian and bicyclist safety (e.g., mid -block crosswalks, bike lanes and routes), uniformity and consistency between contiguous speed zones (e.g., length of the speed zone, spacing and frequency of traffic -controlled intersections, speed zone transitions on "boundary line" streets), and land use conditions adjacent to the roadway (e.g., residential and business districts, commercial driveways, senior centers, etc.).

The CVC stipulates that, in the absence of other factors, physical conditions such as roadway width, curvature, grade and surface pavement conditions are considered to be readily apparent and are the responsibility of the driver to perceive and react to without requiring a special downwardly zoned posted speed limit, per CVC Section 22358.5. Valid consideration of one or more of the above conditions determined as not readily apparent to motorists, however, provides the required justification to allow for a 5-mile per hour (MPH) reduction from the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile where engineering judgment presents evidence and 10 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

- 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II [ZE�.' for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTSCITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
documentation that an adjustment for these factors is needed to match the existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community and road users. 5 - Methodology
Data Collection
In accordance with discussions with city staff, the scope of the study consisted of eleven (11) roadway segments on six (6) citywide streets within the City of Yucaipa. The study included the reevaluation of eight (8) previously surveyed roadway segments and the addition of three (3) new roadway segments. Study segments were determined by City staff based upon the need to update existing Engineering and Traffic Survey data and evaluate additional roadway segments.

Procedure
The primary goal of this E&TS is to determine the suitability of currently -posted speed limits on the selected roadway segments within the City of Yucaipa, and resolve to either change or maintain as -is the designated speed limits along each of the surveyed roadway segments. To make these determinations, the study compiled information both in the field and from City records on prevailing motorist speeds, recent collision history, comparative collision rates for similar roadway types, and any significant roadside conditions not evident to motorists. References under which this study was conducted include sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) provided in Section 7 of this report and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) developed by Caltrans in cooperation with the USDOT/Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

Speed Zoning
The principal method utilized in this E&TS was speed zoning, a process which uses prevailing speeds of drivers as a guide to establish reasonable speed limits for highway sections where original statutory speed limits set by State ordinance may be considered less suitable for the local conditions. Establishment of posted speed limits by speed zoning methods allows motorists to be informed of the safe speed limit under which to drive on a particular roadway under normal conditions, and also protects the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Spot radar speed surveys were conducted to determine the prevailing speeds of drivers on each of the eleven (11) surveyed roadway segments.

The surveys were performed during normal, non -holiday weekdays in May of 2026 during typical daytime periods. The unimpeded free -flow speeds of individual vehicles were measured during the off-peak time periods (9:00 AM — 4:00 PM) with a minimum survey count of either one hundred (100) or two hundred (200) radar samples (i.e., approximately 50 and 100 per direction for street segments without or with raised medians respectively, or for 2 hours of survey). Detailed radar speed zoning sheets are included in Appendix E.

Following the collection of spot speed survey data, all radar measurements were organized, computed, analyzed and summarized on standard Traffic Survey Forms. Various speed -related characteristics were then determined, including the following:
0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
11 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SaO

ENFORCED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS I By
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA !2
85t" Percentile Speed: The speed at which 85% of surveyed motorists did not exceed (i.e., no more than 15% of traffic exceeded) during the radar survey. Also called critical speed, equals one standard deviation from the average speed.
501t' Percentile Speed: The speed at which half of surveyed motorists did not exceed during the radar survey. Also called the median speed, by definition 50% of the observed speeds are below the median, and the other half are above the median.
10-MPH Pace: The 10-mile per hour range containing the largest percentage of speed observations; provides an alternative and more readily identifiable measure to the standard deviation to describe the dispersion of speeds within the survey sample. Consistency in travel speeds is evidenced by a pace that usually includes between 70% and 80% of the free -flowing vehicles. Similar reported statistical data includes the percentage of surveyed vehicles over and under the 10-MPH Pace range.

Average Speed: Equals the calculated average speed of all surveyed vehicles.

Also called the mean speed.

The above statistical attributes were obtained for each segment from the speed survey data collected in the field, and then applied using the CAMUTCD guidelines. The recommended speed limit was presumptively determined as the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 851h percentile speed of free -flowing traffic, with a downward 5-MPH adjustment applied if necessary to reflect the presence of conditions not readily apparent to drivers or to match the existing traffic needs of the community.

It is significant to note that former versions of the California MUTCD required that posted speed limits be presumptively set at the nearest 5-MPH increment to the surveyed the 85th percentile speed, and then adjusted by 5 MPH if justifiable and documented in the study. The most current release of the CA MUTCD 2026, effective January 18, 2026, allows for speed limits to be set at the lower 5-MPH increment to the surveyed 85th percentile speed in those cases where the nearest 5-MPH increment would normally require rounding up, if no further reduction is used. In order to satisfy local traffic and roadway conditions, local agencies may apply this judgment at its own discretion without any required supporting documentation or reasons in the Engineering and Traffic Survey. The results of the speed zoning analysis are summarized in Table 1.

Collisions Analysis
The analysis was based on a review of reported traffic accidents obtained from the University of California Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) for the most recent available five-year period between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2025. The raw collision data was then screened to consider only speeding -related accidents as the primary collision factor, based WMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 12

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED �ENFORCED
t for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS eY

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
on the recommended practice provided in the CAMUTCD and Caltrans' Traffic Manual. Non - speeding related accident reports were omitted from the analysis since this data does not directly correlate to vehicle speeding and can tend to overstate collision rates, particularly for shorter segments.

Prevailing collision rates for each segment were calculated by first determining the total number of speed -related collisions which have occurred during the selected 60-month period. This, along with the measured 24-hour average daily traffic volume of the segment from machine traffic counts collected in the field (see Appendix F for machine count data sheets) and the known segment length, was used in the standard formula below to determine the calculated collision rate for each segment, expressed in terms of collisions per million vehicle miles traveled:

Collision Rate Collisions No. o f Collisions * 1,000,000 MVM - ALIT * Distance * No.of Days
where: No. of Collisions
Number of speed -related collisions on the segment during the selected analysis period (60 months), both directions
1,000,000 Conversion factor for Million -Vehicle -Miles (MVM) ADT Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day), both directions Distance Roadway segment distance traveled by each vehicle (miles) No. of Days Number of days during the selected analysis period (i.e., 1.00 year = 365 days)
The speed zoning analysis tables for each segment are provided on the following pages and utilize the following abbreviations and terminology.

DEFINITIONS:

Equals the 10-mile per hour range in which the largest
10-mi. Pace
number of vehicles were observed to be traveling
% in 10-mi. Pace
The percentage of the total vehicles observed traveling in the 10-mile per hour pace
50th Percentile
The speed at which half of the observed speeds were
observed below and half were observed above
85th Percentile
The speed at or below which 85% of the observed vehicles were surveyed to be traveling at
0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
13 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED i - ENFDADED
fSELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS ,�y� or ENTerAR

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA AAO
Table 1: Speed Zoning Analysis Summary for Updated and New Segments Street
-
•... .SPEED
Segment
NO.

From i 70
Descnpli-
Oisl
m 1 Type ' LU
10-mi jam f0 SOih
Pace Porcennle
mphJ 'e1Y Pacel (mp i/
BAh
{ Poiconfile
I (mph)

ZONING ANALYSIS
Sp dU.1t _ Analysis/
Posfetl PPSL Rec
mph) (m hJ i m hl UStI(icaticnt5/
u
13th St
19 Ave E
Oak Glen Rd

0.53 i COL
R/B
32-41 ` 69% 35
40 35 40 35
No change - due to calculated
- collision rate
Avenue E
25 Yucaipa Blvd
16th St

0.91 COL
R/S/
30-39 1 78 % 34
39 35 40 I 35
No change - due to calculated
-collision
C&I
rate
i
?
Decrease - due to allowable 85th
Bryant St
36 Date Ave
Yucaipa Blvd

0.50 ART
R/C
35-441 79 % i 41
I 44
45 45 i 40
percentile rounding and
residenhal/commercial setting
Oak Glen Rd
77 Northeast City
Cherry Croft Dr

1.95 COL
R 0
44-53 i 63 % 48
53 50 55 i 50
_ No change -due to calculated
Limits
collision rate
Cherry Cron
Decrease - due to allowable 85th
Oak Glen Rd
78 Dr/Jefferson St
Bryant St

0.86 1 COL
I
R/C
39-48 57 % 44
49 50 50 45
w percentile rounding and
I
�
residential/commercialselting
Wildwood Canyon
Decrease - due to residential
Rd
91 Bryant St
Holmes St

0.75 ART
R
38-4778 % i 42
46 45 45 40
w setting and higher calculated
I
collision rate than eripected
Wildwood Canyon
93 Mesa Grande
Oak
ART/
I
R P!
_
No change -due to current 85th
Rd
Dr
Mesa Dr

1.03 COL
0 41-50 79% 46
49 45 50 45
- percentile speed & residential
setti ng
Wildwood Canyon
94 Oak Mesa Dr
Oak Glen Rd
!

1.58 COL
!
R!O
43-52 77% 47
51 45 50 i 45
No change - due to current 85th
speed & residential
Rd
i
_ percentile
setting
Wildwood
No change - due to current 85th
Colorado St
101 Canyon Rd
8th St

0.49 COL
R
34-43 i 84 % 38
42 35 40 35
_ percentile speed & residential
i
setting
Colorado St
102 8th St
9th St

0.25 COL
R
28-37 i 83 % i 32
36 35 35 I 35
_ No change - due to current 85th
I
percentile speed
No change - due to current 85th
Colorado St
103 i 9th St
10th St

0.33 COL
R
30-39 71 % 35
40 35 40 i 35
_ percentile speed & residential
setting
KEY:

Dist.
= Distance of segment
LU
= Land Use
ART
= Arterial (CRS)
C
= Commercial
COL
= Collector (CRS)
B
= Business
LOC
= Local St (CRS)
R
= Residential
Posted
= Existing Posted Speed Limit
C&I
= Civic and Institutional
PPSL
= Presumptive Posted Speed Limit
S
= School
Rec.
= Recommended Posted Speed Limit
P
= Parks & Recreation
A
= Speed Increase
O
= Open Space
V
= Speed Decrease
•
= Post Speed Limit Sign
Table 2 on the following page shows the average statewide collision rates obtained from Caltrans' Collision Data on California State Highways, adjusted to represent proportional rates for speeding -related collisions. These expected rates were used to identify survey segments which exhibit a higher -than -expected collision rate.
i < MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
14 - 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED ENFOflCED
1 for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA fla°nfl
Table 2: Expected Statewide Soeed-Related Traffir_ Cnllicinn Ratnc ROADWAY TYPE* (URBAN) EXPECTED ACCIDENT RATE**
2 - 3 Lanes

0.90 collisions per million vehicle miles
4+ Undivided Lanes

0.73 collisions per million vehicle miles
4+ Divided Lanes

1.09 collisions per million vehicle miles
Source: 2021 Caltrans Annual Collision Data on California State Highways - Crash Summary for District 8 Agency, Department of Transportation, Division of Research, Innovation, and System Information. Sacramento, California. ' Based on FHWA approved 2020 adjusted urban area boundaries which are derived from the 2020 Census urban area boundaries " Basic Average Accident Rates tabulation data. Number of lanes are for both directions of travel and are applicable for both uni- and bi-directional surveyed roadway segments.

Other collected collision history data is summarized in the following figures. Overall, from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2025, there has been a total of 756 total collisions reported on the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), based on Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). This included 19 fatalities and 1,023 other injured victims. The top primary collision factor (PCF) of these collisions was unsafe speed, as shown in the figure below. This PCF was responsible for 246 collisions out of 756 total collisions. 9 (1.20%)
63 (8.39 /,)
11 (1.46%)
135 (17.98%)
132 (17.58%)
PCF Violation
0 03 - Urisafs Sp
IDS - ;;rorg Si_ie of P.oao
0' _nsafo Lam Chan
L•f
_ -;a<-ardzus Parkins
373Fg5
- - other fiaz,racus `di_'Ltion
54 (7.195a)
- — 246 (32.76%)
17 (2.26%)
23 (3.06'/ )
01 - Crivinc or uic.clirg Under t-c IrflLercc of A. cchcl :r D-Lc dl:;:;ing Tco Ch.scl;:
-npmp or Passinw
mproEo-, Turning
1_ Traffic Sinn.als and Signs
l6 h_r=gLipment
ie O:h r Than Driver :or Pcdestriar
-_ - Other .mpropor Driving
Figure 1: Number of Crashes by Primary Crash Factor (PCF) Violation (January 1, 2021 - December 31, 2025)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) 0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 15

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II ENFORCED for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS BY

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
200
100
0 —
rloti
. F
le
ro'
5`��
C,�
Q� •
0�0
�� ,e(� eke
� p \v�Q
r
,2
\,
G
Type of Crash
Not Stated A - Head -On B - Sideswipe
C Rear End D - Broadside E - Hit Object
F O•;e-ti.-red G- Vehic= I'-::_ r i ► H Other
Figure 2: Number of Crashes due to Unsafe Speed by Crash Type (January 1, 2021 - December 31, 2025)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) i50
10,E
50 0
246 CG:,s ,..:
1 - Fatal 2 - Injury (Severe) 3 - Injury (Other 4 - Injury Visible) (Complaint of
Pain)
Crash Severity
10 1 Faial • 2 Injury (Severe) 4111 3 - Injury (Other Visible) 0 4 - Injury (Complaint of Pain) Figure 3: Number of Crashes due to Unsafe Speed by Crash Severity (January 1, 2021 - December 31, 2025)
Source: University of California, Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 16

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE - Phase II ENFOSPERCED j ED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS HY

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
To evaluate the collision behavior of each street segment, the calculated collision rate for each segment was compared to the average statewide collision rates for streets with comparable characteristics. The results of the accident analysis for the eleven (11) surveyed roadway segments are summarized in Tables 3.

Table 3: Collision Data Summary and Analysis for New and Updated Segments

ROADWAY
INFORM
No
Segment Limits
- - ----- - -
A TION
Roadway Type
- - - - Direction
Length
ADT

COLLISION ANALYSIS
I Collision Rafe
Number of '
Street
From
TO
€ Division of Travel i
(mi.)
! (vpd)
Collisions237i7
Expected'
Calculated'
Laoesf'
i (A/MVM)
(A/MVM)
13th Street
19 'Ave E
;Oak Glen Rd
2 U
N/S i

0.53 `. 2.366
4 0.90

1.75 Avenue E
25 Yucaipa Blvd
16th St
2 U/D
E W

0.91 3,059
5 0.90

0.98 Bryant Street
36 Date Ave
Yucaipa Blvd
4 D
Nis
0-50

10.863
10 109

1.01 Oak Glen Road
77 N lortheast City Limits Cherry Croft Or
2 U
WS

1.95 1,537
6 0.90

1.10 Oak Glen Road
I
7e ; Cherry Croft
;Dr/Jefferson St
'Bryant St
z
U
ws
o.es
`:: a,sso
5 0.90

0.70 Wildwood Canyon Road
91 !Bryant St
Fblmes St
2 U I
E/W

0.75 6,705
11 ; 0.90
120
Wildwood Canyon Road
93 [k*saGrande or
;Oak Mesa or
2 U
FJW

1.03 5,339
7 ? 0.90

0.70 Wildwood Canyon Road
94 Oak Mesa Or
Oak Glen Rd
2 U €
ElW

1.58 ; 3,730
0 3 0.90

0.00 Colorado Street
101 Wildwood Canyon
81h St
2 i
U I
F1W 1

0.49 2,455
0 , 0.90

0.00 Colorado Street
102 81h St
9lh St
2 U
FPN t

0.25 ! 11867
0 1 0.90

0.00 Colorado Street 1
103 9th St
10th St
2 U
FPN

0.33 1,386
0 0.90

0.00 Notes:
[1] Includes both directions of traffic on the selected roadway segment [2] Over a 5-year period from 111121 to 12/31/25. Data compiled from U.C. Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System JIMS). [3] Collisions pertaining to unsafe speed as the primary collision factor. [4] Per Mllion Vehicle Mles (WM)
[5] Collisions per Mllion Vehicle-Mles of Travel = W. of Collisions x 1,000,000 ADTx Distance x No. of Days
w here:

No. of Collisions = Total number of speed -related collisions recorded on the segment for period of 5.00 years (1826 days) ADT= Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day, both directions of traffic except for one-sided segments as indicated) Distance = Total length ofsegment (miles)
No. of Days = 365 days for a duration period of 1.00 years of collision data Bold/Underline = Calculated collision rate is higher than the expected rate for a similar roadway type LEGEND
ADT: Average Daily Traffic (in vehicles per day, both directions of traffic) A/MVM: Accidents Per Million Vehicle Miles
D: Divided
U: Undivided
Survey of Street Segments
Minagar & Associates, Inc. staff also evaluated each of the eleven (11) roadway segments to observe the following existing roadway, roadside and traffic conditions, and identify individual or combined factors which may not be readily apparent to drivers.

Segment length
■ Roadway pavement width
■ Number of travel lanes
■ Center median division
■ Type and frequency of traffic controls on the primary road Sight distance and visibility of driveways and side street traffic due to:
o Horizontal curvature
o Vertical alignment and grade shifts
WMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 17

._; 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II UDA'l for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTSCITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
o On -street parking
o Large street trees planted in the median and/or adjacent parkway(s) o Two-way left turn traffic in the center lane
o Offset or skewed intersection approaches
Roadway lighting
x Abutting land use density and property access along the roadway ■ Commercial and residential driveway spacing
a Bicyclists and bike lanes/routes
n Heavy vehicle, golf cart, and NEV/LSV traffic
Pedestrians, crosswalks, sidewalks, school children walking along roadway due to the absence or discontinuity of sidewalks
These characteristics are described for each segment in the summary sheets provided in Appendix D.
6 — Engineering & Traffic Survey Results and Recommendations This Engineering & Traffic Survey update is intended to evaluate and validate posted speed limits for eleven (11) surveyed roadway segments within the City of Yucaipa, based on a thorough evaluation of the collected data and standard speed zoning practice. Prima Facie speed limits serve to advise drivers and law enforcement of what is the reasonable and prudent speed under normal conditions.

The field radar -measured 85th percentile speed was rounded to the nearest upper or lower 5-MPH increment, as appropriate, and used as the recommended posted speed limit. Where other significant factors were demonstrated, such as an above -average collision rate; traffic, roadway and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and/or the need to consider legal prima facie speed limits, the presumptive speed limit was adjusted upward or downward by a 5 mile per hour increment to the final recommended posted speed. In some cases where the roadway segment is located along a "local street" as designated by the California Road System (CRS), several of the existing posted speed limits are proposed to maintain as -is, notwithstanding presumptive posted speed limit, in order to meet the needs of the local community and prevailing road users in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC (§40802, §22358, §22352, §22354, §22357, and 22358.3) allowing the local authority to do so.

The findings of this E&TS indicate that eight (8) of the eleven (11) surveyed roadway segments evaluated as part of this update are recommended to remain unchanged. Three (3) roadway segments are recommended for a decrease in posted limit. The three (3) newly evaluated Colorado Street segments are recommended to be posted at 35 MPH. The recommended speed limits are based on prevailing speeds, collision history, traffic volumes, roadway characteristics, and surrounding land use conditions documented within this report.

The recommended speed limit decreases include Segment No. 36 on Bryant Street from Date Avenue to Yucaipa Boulevard, Segment No. 78 on Oak Glen Road from Cherry Croft 0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 18

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II E FORCED for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS Rr
RADAR

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
Drive/Jefferson Street to Bryant Street, and Segment No. 91 on Wildwood Canyon Road from Bryant Street to Holmes Street. No increases to existing posted speed limits are recommended as part of this Engineering & Traffic Survey update.

See Appendix C for a summary of the above findings and recommendations for each segment. 7 — Applicable Vehicle Codes
The following codes were considered relevant in preparing the E&T Survey Report as provided in the 2026 California Vehicle Code (CVC):
■ 235 Business District
A "business district' is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
■ 240 Business and Residence Districts: Determination
In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the following limitations shall apply and qualify the definitions in Sections 235 & 515:
(a) No building shall be regarded unless its entrance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway. (b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be regarded for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district. (c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs, & public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures. (d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
■ 515 Residence District
A "residence district' is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than r; MINAGAR 8 ASSOCIATES, INC.
19 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED

ENFORCED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS DBY
R

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
one -quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
■ 627 Engineering and Traffic Survey
(a) Engineering and traffic survey," as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities. (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
(2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
(c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is
occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or
business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one -quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
(Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 690, Sec. 1. (AB 43) Effective January 1, 2022.) ■ 21400 Uniform Standards
(a) The Department of Transportation shall, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to this code, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SP j.jA.
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs placed pursuant to Section 21364.
(b) The Department of Transportation shall, after notice and public hearing, determine and publicize the specifications for uniform types of warning signs, lights, and devices to be placed upon a highway by a person engaged in performing work that interferes with or endangers the safe movement of traffic upon that highway.
(c) Only those signs, lights, and devices as are provided for in this section shall be placed upon a highway to warn traffic of work that is being performed on the highway.
(d) Control devices or markings installed upon traffic barriers on or after January 1, 1984, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications required by this section.
(Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 690, Sec. 2. (AB 43) Effective January 1, 2022.) ■ 22349 Maximum Speed Limit
(a) Except as provided in Section 22356, no person may drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person may drive a vehicle upon a two-lane, undivided highway at a speed greater than 55 miles per hour unless that highway, or portion thereof, has been posted for a higher speed by the Department of Transportation or appropriate local agency upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. For purposes of this subdivision, the following apply:
(1) A two-lane, undivided highway is a highway with not more than one through lane of travel in each direction.
(2) Passing lanes may not be considered when determining the number of through lanes.
(c) It is the intent of the Legislature that there be reasonable signing on affected two-lane, undivided highways described in subdivision (b) in continuing the 55 miles -per -hour speed limit, including placing signs at county boundaries to the extent possible, and at other appropriate locations.
(Amended by Stats. 1999, Ch. 724, Sec. 41. Effective January 1, 2000.) ■ 22350
sic pee aw
No person shall drive a vehicle upon a
highway at a speed greater than is
reasonable or prudent having due regard for
weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the
surface and width of, the highway, and in no
event at a speed which endangers the safety
of persons or property.
"No Person Shall Drive a
Vehicle Upon a Highway at a
Speed Greater Than is
Reasonable or Prudent..."
Basic Speed Law
California Vehicle Code (CVC)
DI /Ch7/Art1 /§22350
(Amended by Stats. 1999, Ch. 724, Sec. 41. Effective Jan. 1, 2000.) ■ 22351 Speed Law Violations
0 MINAGAR $ ASSOCIATES, INC. 21

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II [11Z�IDEKID
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
(a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law. (b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
■ 22352 Prima Facie Speed Limits
(a) The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(1) Fifteen miles per hour:
(A) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of an traffic o th R IF d'
20 MPH

SPEED LIMIT
"When approaching
or passing a school
building or school
grounds where a
20 MPH school -zone
speed limit has been
properly established
and posted"
- Prima Facie Speed
Limits: 20mph, California
Vehicle Code (CVC)
§22358.4 AB 382
y n e I CA way or a istance of 400 feet in both
directions along the railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
(B) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
(C) On any alley.
(2) Twenty-five miles per hour:
(A) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning
sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard
losiiliiibk
WMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 22

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II FEE ERF°RCE°
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RA°AR
"SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(B) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning
sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard
"SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (C) When passing
a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may
request grant funding from the Active Transportation
Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section
2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.
(Amended by Stats. 20121, Ch. 690, Sec. 3 (AB 43) Effective Jan. 1, 2022.) IN 22357 Increase of Local Speed Limits to 65 Miles Per Hour (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing QUMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 23

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS ENPBYCED
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA er
RADAR
a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.
(Repealed (in Sec. 28) and added by Stats. 1995, Ch. 766, Sec. 29. Effective January 1, 1996. This section became operative, by its own provisions, on the date described in Section 22366.) ■ 22357.1 Decrease Near Children's Playgrounds
Notwithstanding Section 22357, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, set a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on any street, other than a state highway, adjacent to any children's playground in a public park but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use the facilities. The 25 mile per hour speed limit shall be effective when signs giving notice of the speed limit are posted.
(Added by Stats. 1989, Ch. 508, Sec. 1.)
■ 22358 Decrease of Local Speed Limits
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.
(Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 690, Sec. 5 (AB43) Effective Jan. 1, 2022.) ■ 22358.4 Decrease of Local Limits Near Schools or Senior Centers (a)
(1) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit established by subdivision (b) of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 15 miles per hour if justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey.
(2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(b)
0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 24

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED j for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS BY
J" CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA HADAR ENFDHDED
(c)
(1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, in a school zone. (B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit on a highway when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school zone. (2) The prima facie limit established under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) applies only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the school zone.
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration. (5) (A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from the school grounds. (D) A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs incurred by the department under this subdivision.

For purposes of this section, "school zone" has the same meaning as defined in Section 22352.
(Amended by Stats. 2025, Ch. 208, Sec. 15. (AB 2906) Effective January 1, 2026.) ■ 22358.5 Downward Speed Zoning
It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions. (Added by Stats. 1989, Ch. 11.)
■ 22358.7 Additional Reduction of Local Speed Limits (AB 1014) a
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
25 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SREEO

ENFORCED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS RY

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
(a) If the Department of Transportation or a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the Department of Transportation may or the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either or both of the following reasons:
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. (2) The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. (Amended by Stats. 2025, Ch 287, Sec. 3. (AB1014) Effective January 1, 2026) ■ 22359 Boundary Line Streets
With respect to boundary line streets and
highways where portions thereof are within
different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted
under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be
effective as to any such portion until all
authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of
the street concerned have approved the same.

This section shall not apply in the case of
boundary line streets consisting of separate
roadways within different jurisdictions.
(Amended by Stats. 163, Ch. 209.)
■ 22361 Multiple -Lane Highways
On multiple -lane highways with two or more
separate roadways different prima facie speed
limits may be established for different roadways
under any of the procedures specified in Sections
22354 to 22359, inclusive.
(Amended by Stats. 1963, Ch. 209.)
"No ordinance... shall be
effective... until all
authorities having
jurisdiction of the portions
of the street concerned
have approved the same."
(Does not include boundary
line streets consisting of
separate roadways within
different jurisdictions)
- Boundary Line Streets
California Vehicle Code (CVC)
D11 /Ch7/Art1 /§22359
AB 1014
Additional 5 MPH
Speed Reduction
"A local authority may
reduce a speed limit an
additional 5 MPH where a
safety corridor exists or
where adjacent land uses
generate high
concentrations of
bicyclists or pedestrians."
AB 1014
- California Vehicle Code
(CVC) §22358.7 AB 1014
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
26 -- 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase If SPEED

ENFDACED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS Rr
R

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADA
■ 40801 Speed Trap Prohibition
No peace officer or other person shall use a
speed trap in arresting, or participating or
assisting in the arrest of, any person for any
alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed
trap be used in securing evidence as to the
speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest
or prosecution under this code.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
■ 40802 Speed Traps
(a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway
measured as to distance and with
b d' k d d
"No peace officer or
other person shall use a
speed trap in
arresting...any person for
any alleged violation of
this code, nor shall any
speed trap be used in
securing evidence as to
the speed of any
vehicle..."
oun arles mar e , esignated,
or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
(2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. (b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as "local" on the "California Road System Maps," that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. When a street or road does not appear on the "California Road System Maps," it may be defined as a "local street or road" if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length.

Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section, "school zone" means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone" also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, 0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
27 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II ENFOR ED �a for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS Rno R

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign.
(3) For purposes of this section, "senior zone" means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SENIOR" warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4) For purposes of this section, "business activity district" means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section.
(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was
approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in
subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the
Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with
subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of
subparagraph (D).
(ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(d) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 28

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II ENFDfl EO for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTSBY I
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAfl
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise
determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be
calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
(B)
(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway
with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of
subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established
under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if
that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an
engineering and traffic survey conducted within one
of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit
involves the use of radar or any other electronic
device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(1) Except as specified in subclause (11), seven
years.
(11) If an engineering and traffic survey was
conducted more than seven years prior to the
date of the alleged violation, and a registered
engineer evaluates the section of the
highway and determines that no significant
changes in roadway or traffic conditions have
occurred, including, but not limited to,
changes in adjoining property or land use,
roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years.
(ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity
district, or speed limit adopted under Section
22358.7 or 22358.8.
(Amended by Stats. 2022, Ch. 406, Sec. 5. (AB 1938) Effective January 1, 2023.) ■ 40803 Speed Trap Evidence
(a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speedtrap. (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speedtrap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 29

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING $ TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS ENFORCED
BY

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
(Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 124, Sec. 147. Effective January 1, 1997.) aMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 30

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II sarEo

ENFORCED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS eY

J RADAR

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
8 - References

1. 2026 California Vehicle Codes (CVC)
- Division 1: Words and Phrases Defined. §100-681
- Division 11: Rules of the Road. Chapter 7, Article 1: Generally (Speed Laws). §22348- 22413
- Division 17: Offenses and Prosecution. Chapter 3, Article 1: Prosecutions Under Code. §40800-40808

2. California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), Jan.18, 2026 - Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), as amended for use in California. - Chapter 2B: Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates
- Sections 2B.13 and 2B.18

3. Federal Highway Administration Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (FHWA MUTCD, 11th Edition, Revision 1, Dec. 2025)

4. Citywide Engineering & Traffic Survey (E&TS) Reports Conducted and Prepared by Minagar & Associates, Inc.

Minagar & Associates, Inc.'s 32 Citywide E&TS Projects in Southern California Contract
No of Speed
Agency
County
Year
MUTCD Version
Zone
Segments
1 City of Rancho Mirage
Riverside
2026
CAMUTCD 2026 (Jan 18 2026)
7 2
1 City of Norco
Riverside
2025
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev 9 2025)
78 3
City of South Gate
Los Angeles
2025
CALlUTCD 2014 (Rev 9 2025)
49 4
City of South Pasadena
Los Angeles
2025
CAMIUTCD 2014 (Rev 9 2025)
58 5
City of Hawaiian Gardens
Los Angeles
2024
CAI'•;IUTCD 2014 (Rev & 2024)
38 6
City of Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
2024
CAhlUTCD 2014 (Rev 7 2024)
118
7 City of Yucaipa
San Bernardino
2023
CAMIUTCD 2014 (Rev 7 2024)
100
8 City of Rancho Mirage
Riverside
2023
C4,11LITCD 2014 (Rev 7 2024)
67 9
City of Solona Beach
San Diego
2023
CAMIUTCD 2014 (Rev 7 2024)
29 10
Q
City of Needles
San Bernardino
2022
CAMIUTCD 2014 (Rev 6 2024)
21 11
City of Colton
San Bernardino
2022
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev 6, 2024)
44 12
City of South Gate
Los Angeles
2021-2022
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev 6 2024)
49 13
Q-
City of Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
2021-2022
CArBUTCD 2014 (Rev 6 2024)
115
14 'a_
City of Pomona
Los Angeles
2020-2021
CAfr1UTCD 2014 (Rev 5 2024)
131
15 . •
City of Beaumont
Riverside
2017-2018
CAMUTCD 2014 (Rev 2 2024)
48 16
City of Bell
Los Angeles
2017
CAh•;1UTCD 2014 (Rev 2 2024)
14 17
City of Rancho Mirage
Riverside
2017
CAr•AUTCD 2014 (Rev 2. 2024)
66 18
City of Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
2016-2017
CAr•;1UTCD 2014 (Rev 1 2024)
115
19 City of South Pasadena
Los Angeles
2014-2015
CAMUTCD 2014
60 20
City of Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
2014
CAf•AUTCD 2012
115
21 City of Colton
San Bernardino
2013-2014
CAMIUTCD 2012
44 22
City of Culver City
Los Angeles
2013
CAMUTCD 2012
70 23
"1r
City of Lawndale
Los Angeles
2013
CAIJUTC❑ 2012
22 24
"
City of South Pasadena
Los Angeles
2012
CAMUTCD 2012
5 25
City of San Marino
Los Angeles
2011
CA101LITCD 2010
59 26
City of South Pasadena
Los Angeles
2010
CXJUTCD 2010
6 27
City of Manhattan Beach
Los Angeles
2010
CAh•AUTCD 2010 (2009 Rev)
51 28
Q�
City of Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles
2009
CAMUTCD 2006
115
29 {_;
City of Baldwin Park
Los Angeles
2009
CAfr1UTCD 2006
54 30
v
City of Rancho Santa Margarita
Orange County
2004
P,IUTCD 2003 (CA Supp)
11 31
{ ,
City of Baldwin Park
Los Angeles
2004
rdUTCD (CA Supp)
54 32
City of Redondo Beach
Los Angeles
2003
NlUTCD
57 E&TS Projects - Total Radar Speed Zone Segments Surveyed as of May 27, 2026

1.870
� , 31
f(k,' "�,!MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE SPEED y�r,c for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS 1;9

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
Appendix A
2026 Citywide E&TS Update Map of
Recommended Speed Limits for Selected
Roadway Segments
0111, MINAGAR
& ASSOCIATES, INC.

W
fn
L
a
w
F-
❑
a
w
C0
V
LL
qL
L�G
06 Z
Vr W
Z
W
wU)
w
Z Q
Q
zQ
w0
W
W
H
(U
W
�W
N
O 6.

N 0
o ? G
>- O W
ob
N8) J/y
0 '
° I z �(
U FQ-
lZ O ¢
i
'
N
oa
N
%U 40
r
wZ
QI
'
r
i1
WZ
2 7
ZD
2 I
q �
O ,
O I
�O
I
3 I
I
I
1 1
�z
.t
O
ory
IS
NOstozi 3f
j
1 p "k,
I
a
�
a0
a
a
• >
! is S3WlOH
;
w L
a
v
>
w g
I
IIS
Y
- —
W
y
1S aN~ U
is a j
O W
��
°by `yrs
o
1S HIV
W
'
a
U w
9j0
_0
1S HIS
y
bO
IS HIS 3
t
is H19�
■
_
I '
V
>
IS H,L
!
z
F-
Z
Ow
• ,
isW He
I
•
r
G
�o
U H
O
a
W
•
o
O
is H,u
=Zyo
Q
O
`W`rH
CL
,
O
Z
Urcc9F'
I
J
Z Z
7 sy 1S HjZ6
A4 `
O
J is "a
CL
_
rn
v
I
Q
G.
is "n
1 IS His 6
y °d'
Z I
ca
Q
Q
ffl
Q is H19L
tiO
- ._ ,�, b
D
U 1 }
�y
U
D
O
d
C
O
t
° w �' °� 0 1 F-
w yj qz
�i3W
Z
Il
Q
�
1U
O
p
0 � G
N
Q
J
z
LO
OfLO
N
J
sP
~
,
C
U
L
a
w
,H:... o z
Z'W
a
NI�
y
o Q
s Fg
W
I
I
-,
I
co
2 Nam;
1FA

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE SPEED

EHFDRDED
%,,ss for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS RY
RADAR
CITY OF YUCAIPA. CA
Appendix B
2023 Citywide E&TS Map of Posted Speed
Limits
0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

000
W
Q
a
W
U
LL
Z
Ue W
z
�W
WY)
W}
z_a
C9 0
Zaa
WOU
LLJ
❑tea
Lu
in =)
F-W}
W O
N U) >_
L.

N w U
Q
z
z
=o
py O H
.z 0 9
z O
CL
it K
ZO
2' Z_
m Z
Z
Q
F 1S NOSa3:133f I K
N =
W J
W > V
Q
U Of
LL O
1S 1NVAtNB
JQ Ha 3�IISA
a y �. g
z
z
VW
O
>:
z p
a
,.o
z o
m z
J
z
a
"♦3
d
U)
a
V)
d
N
O
a
C
G
;p
� -
N
R
0 w
CL 2
p
J
N
U
y
I
I
z -AK
et
�
o
I
N
I
�
�I
�I
a
Z i
Z
o
� I
I
I
H
U,
�I
LU
m
Z♦
1S S3WlOH
04 Z
1S 1NOW3NJ
O ojf
N W W
i
is s�nonoa
Lu
a Z W
a
151NtlAi19
L) >
1S tlINHOjlltlO
Z l
o
LL W
O0
U�
I
}F>-
LL
is a£
'
>
U f_-
U
T
2 L0

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase If SPEEo for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS IV

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
Appendix C
Summary of Recommended Changes to
Posted Speed Limits
(ii MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE —Phase 11 ENFORCED f '1PE11
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS By
RADAR
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA 19

SEGMENT

INFORMATION
SPEED

ANALYSIS
ZONING
No. ...............................................

Limits ......................................

Speed Limit. (mph)
Street
From
I TO
Ex
.....................
85th
Rec.

Change
13th Street
19 :Ave E
:Oak Glen Rd
35 40
35 -
Avenue E
25 :Yucaipa Blvd
1 6th St
35 39
35 -
Bryant Street
36 Date Ave
:Yucaipa Blvd
45 44
40 Decrease
Oak Glen Road
77 :Northeast City Limits :Cherry Croft Dr
50 53
50 -
Oak Glen Road
:Cherry Croft
78 :
:Bryant St
50 49
45 Decrease
Dr/Jefferson St
Wildwood Canyon Road
91 :Bryant St
Holmes St
45 46
40 Decrease
Wildwood Canyon Road
93 :Mesa Grande Dr
Oak Mesa Dr
45 49
45 Wildwood Canyon Road
94 :Oak Mesa Dr
Oak Glen Rd
45 51
45 Colorado Street
101 Wildwood Canyon Rd 18th St
35 i 42
35 Colorado Street
102 :8th St
:9th St
35 36
35 Colorado Street
103 :9th St
1 Oth St
35 40
35 Ex: Existing Prima Facie Speed
Limit
85th: Eighty-fifth Percentile Survey
Speed
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
190111t%
qw MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

" - 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED ��ENFORCED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS 1 8Y
7 CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA L!2!Lj
Appendix D
Roadway Segment Analysis of Factors Not
Readily Apparent and Traffic Data Summary
Sheets
0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II ENFORLCD SPEED
c for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS Dy
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RAO�R

CITY OF YUCAIPA
2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 19 13th Street
lAve E to Oak Glen Rd
DATE: 6/11/2026
SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:30 PM - 10:00 PM
CHECK BY: P Navarro
1- PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile
40 Miles
10 MPH Pace
32-41 MPH
Percent in Pace
69%
Posted Speed Limit
35 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed
60 Speed -Related Accidents
1 Total Accidents
4 Expected Collision Rate

0.90 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate

1.75 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Tralfic
2366 Vehides Per Day
Lane Configuration
1 Lane Per Direction
Trafic Controls
Stop - Oak Glen/Ave E
Crosswalks
At Ave E (sch)
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Few/Few
Truck Traffic
No
On -Street Parking
Yes
Other
Areas of wide and narrow roadway with no schoulders, areas of no parking 4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment

0.53 Miles
Vertical Curve
Slight gradual up/downhill grades, dips at intersections Horizontal Curve
None
Lateral Visibility
Good
Road Conditions
Good
Sidewalk/Driveways
No/Yes
Street Lighting
No
Other
Undivided
Adjacent Land Use
Residential, Business
35 MPH
Speed Limit Change
No Change
Justification
Due to calculated collision rate

CERTIFICATION
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify thatthis Engineering and Traffic surveyfor the City of Yucaipa was performed undermy supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this
type a nd am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The surveyhas been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines
contained in the most currentversions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of-Fra nsportation Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true a nd accurate description of traff cconditions existing on Yucaipa's streets.

RCE #53466 6/11/2026
Fred Minagar
State Registration No. Date
OMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

QU MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED % for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS ENrORCED
BY

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR

CITY OF YUCAIPA
2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 25 Avenue E
Yucaipa Blvd to 16th St
DATE: 6/11/2026
SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 9:00 PM - 9:30 PM
CHECK BY: P Navarro
1- PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile
39 Miles
10 MPH Pace
30-39 MPH
Percent in Pace
78%
Posted Speed Limit
35 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed
60 Speed -Related Accidents
1 Total Accidents
5 Expected Collision Rate

0.90 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate

0.98 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
3059 Vehicles Per Day
Lane Configuration
1 Lane Per Direction
Traffic Controls
Signal - Yucaipa/Oak Glen / Stop - 12th/13th/14th/16th/Dunlap (EB only) Crosswalks
at Yucaipa/Oak Glen/12th (sch)/13th (sch)
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Yes/Few
Truck Traffic
No
On -Street Parking
Yes
Other
"Cross traffic does not slop" at 161h, equestrian xing
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment

0.91 Miles
Vertical Curve
Slight up/downhil grades
Horizontal Curve
Slight"S" curves
Lateral Visibility
Good
Road Conditions
Poor
Sidewalk/Driveways
Partial/Yes (Many)
Street Lighting
No
Other
Undivided
Adjacent Land Use
Residential, School, Civic & Instblional
35 MPH
Speed Limit Change
No Change
Justification
Due to calculated collision rate

CERTIFICATION
I, Fred Mina gar do herby certify thatthis Engineering and Traffic Surveyfor the City of Yucaipa was performed under my supervision. I certify that l am both experienced in performing surveys oft his type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in them ostcurrentversions oft he California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manua Ion Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents at rue and accurate description of traffic conditions existing
on Yucaipa'sstreets.
dRCE#53466
6/11/2026
Fred Minagar
State Registration No. Date
CMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

U MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEE° tj for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS By

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR

CITY OF YUCAIPA
2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 361 Bryant Street
Date Ave to Yucaipa Blvd
DATE: 7/15/2026
SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 2:20 PM - 2:40 PM
CHECK BY: P Navarro
1- PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile
44 Miles
10 MPH Pace
35-44 MPH
Percent in Pace
79%
Posted Speed Limit
45 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed
60 Speed -Related Accidents
3 Total Accidents
10 Expected Collision Rate

1.09 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate

1.01 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
10863 Vehicles Per Day
Lane Configuration
2 Lane Per Direction
Trafic Controls
Signal - Yucaipa / Stop - Date
Crosswalks
At Date/Yucaipa
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Yes/Yes
TruckTrafic
Yes
On -Street Parking
No
Other
No shoulders/red curb entire segment
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment

0.5 Miles
Vertical Curve
Slight up/downhill grades
Horizontal Curve
None
Lateral Visibility
Good
Road Conditions
Fair
Sidewalk/Driveways
PartiaVYes
Street Lighting
Yes
Other
Divided
Adjacent Land Use
Residential, Commercial
40 MPH
Speed Limit Change

DECREASE
Justification
Due to current 85th percentile speed, allowable rounding to the lower 5-MPH increment and residential/commercial setting.

CERTIFICATION
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify thatthis Engineering and Traffic Surveyfor the City of Yucaipa was performed undermy supervision. I certify that I am both experiencedin performing surveys ofthistypeand
am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer.The surveyhas been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines
contained in the most currentversions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true a nd accurate description of trafficconditions existing
on Yucaipa's streets.
4 RCE #53466 7/15/2026
Fred Minagar
State Registration No. Date
OMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING $ TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEE° for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS RA°AR
% CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA

CITY OF YUCAIPA
2026CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 77 Oak Glen Road
Northeast City Limits to Cherry Croft Dr
DATE: 6/11/2026
SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 3:00 PM - 3:25 PM
CHECK BY: P Navarro
1- PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile
53 Miles
10 MPH Pace
44-53 MPH
Percent in Pace
63%
Posted Speed Limit
50 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed
60 Speed -Related Accidents
3 Total Accidents
6 Expected Collision Rate

0.90 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate

1.10 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Trafic
1537 Vehicles Per Day
Lane Configuration
1 Lane Per Direction
Traffic Controls
None
Crosswalks
None
Pedestrian/Bicycles
No/Few
Truck Trafic
Yes
On -Street Parking
No
Other
Areas of narrow roadway with no shoulders
4 ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
1,95 Miles
Vertical Curve
Gradual -moderate up/downhill grades
Horizontal Curve
Gradual -sweeping 'S" curves
Lateral Visibility
Limited sight distance
Road Conditions
Poor
Sidewalk/Driveways
No/Few
Steel Lighting
No
Other
Undivided
Adjacent Land Use
Residential, Open Space
50 MPH
Speed Limit Change
No Change
Justification
Due to calculated collision rate

CERTIFICATION
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify thatthis Engineering and Traffic Surveyfor the City of Yucaipa was performed undermy supervision. I certify that I am both experienced i n performing surveys of this
type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The survey has been conductedin strict compliance with guidelines
contained in the most currentversionsof the California Vehicle Code(CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description oftrafflc conditions existing on Yucaipa's streets.

RCE #53466 6/11/2026
Fred Minagar
State Registration No. Date
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
r MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS BY

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR

CITY OF YUCAIPA
2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 78 Oak Glen Road
JCherry Croft Dr/Jefferson St to Bryant St
DATE: 7/15/2026
SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 2:40 PM - 3:00 PM
CHECK BY: P Navarro
1- PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile
49 Miles
10 MPH Pace
39-48 MPH
Percent in Pace
57%
Posted Speed Limit
50 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed
60 Speed -Related Accidents
0 Total Accidents
5 Expected Collision Rat

0.90 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate

0.70 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Trafic
4550 Vehicles Per Day
Lane Configuration
1 Lane Per Direction
Trafic Controls
Signal - Bryant
Crosswalks
At Bryant
Pedestrian/Bicycles
NoNes
Truck Trafic
Yes
On -Street Parking
No
Other
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment

0.86 Miles
Vertical Curve
Gradual -moderate up/downhill grades
Horizontal Curve
Slight"S" curves
Lateral Visibility
Good
Road Conditions
Poor
Sidewalk/Driveways
Partial/Few
Street Lighting
Yes
Other
Undivided
Adjacent Land Use
Residential, Commercial
45 MPH
Speed Limit Change

DECREASE
Justification
Due to current 85th percentile speed, allowable rounding to the lower 5-M PH increment, and residential/commercial setting.

CERTIFICATION
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify thatthis Engineering and Traffic Surveyfor the City of Yucaipa was performed undermy supervision. I certify that I am both experiencedin performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The surveyhas been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines
contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description oftrafficconditions existing
on Yucaipa's streets.
4 L
RCE #53466 7/15/2026
Fred Minagar
State Registration No. Date
aMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
aMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase If SPEED r for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RaoaR

CITY OF YUCAIPA
2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 91 Wildwood Canyon Road
Bryant St to Holmes St
DATE: 7/15/2026
SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 1:15 PM - 1:35 PM
CHECK BY: P Navarro
1- PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile
46 Miles
10 MPH Pace
38-47 MPH
Percent in Pace
78%
Posted Speed Limit
45 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed
60 Speed -Related Accidents
2 Total Accidents
11 Expected Collision Rate

0.90 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate

1.20 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
6705 Vehicles Per Day
Lane Configuration
1 Lane Per Direction
Traft Controls
Stop - Bryant/ Holmes
Crosswalks
None
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Few/No
Truck Traffic
Few/No
On -Street Parking
Partial
Other
Areas of no parking anytime, areas of narrow roadway with no shoulders 4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment

0.75 Miles
Vertical Curve
Gradual -moderate up/downhill grades
Horizontal Curve
Slight"S" curves
Lateral Visibility
Limited sight distance
Road Conditions
Fair
Sidewalk/Driveways
NoNes
Street Lighting
Yes
Other
Undivided
Adjacent Land Use
Residential
40 MPH
Speed Limit Change

DECREASE
Justification
Due to residential setting and calculated collision rate exceeding the expected rate.

CERTIFICATION
I, Fred Minagar dolnerbycertifythatthis Engineering and Traffic SurveVforthe City of Yucaipa was performed undermy supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys ofthis
type a nd am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The surveyhas been conductedin strict compliance with guidelines
contained in the most currentversionsofthe California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department ofTra nsportation Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existingon Yucaipa's
streets.
4 RCE #53466 7/15/2026
Fred Minagar
State Registration No. Date
OIUIINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
�a� �i'MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

- 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS RroRcro
BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAfl

CITY OF YUCAIPA
2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 93 Wildwood Canyon Road
I Mesa Grande Dr to Oak Mesa Dr
DATE: 6/11/2026
SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 1:35 PM - 1:55 PM
CHECK BY: P Navarro
1- PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile
49 Miles
10 MPH Pace
41-50 MPH
Percent in Pace
79%
Posted Speed Limit
45 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed
60 Speed -Related Accidents
1 Total Accidents
7 Expected Collision Rate

0.90 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate

0.70 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
5339 Vehicles Per Day
Lane Configuration
1 Lane Per Direction
Trafic Controls
Stop - Mesa Grande
Crosswalks
At Mesa Grande / Canyon
Pedestrian/Bicycles
No/Few
Truck Trafic
Few
On -Street Parking
No parking anytime
Other
Areas of narrow roadway with no shoulder
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment

1.03 Miles
Vertical Curve
Constantslight-gradual up/downhill grades
Horizontal Curve
Constant gradual -moderate "S" curves
Lateral Visibility
Limited sight distance
Road Conditions
Good
Sidewalk/Driveways
No/No
Street Lighting
Yes
Other
Undivided
Adjacent Land Use
Residential, Park, Open Space
WIN
45 MPH
Speed Limit Change
No Change
Justification
Due to current 85th percentile speed & residential setting

CERTIFICATION
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify thatthis Engineering and Traffic Surveyfor the City of Yucaipa was performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type a nd am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The surveyhas been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most currentversions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description oftrafficconditions existing on Yucaipa's streets.

RCE#53466 6/11/2026
Fred Minagar
State Registration No. Date
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

- 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED � " ` ENfORLED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA. CA RaoeR

CITY OF YUCAIPA
2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 94 Wildwood Canyon Road
10ak Mesa Dr to Oak Glen Rd
DATE: 6/11/2026
SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 1:55 PM - 2:20 PM
CHECK BY: P Navarro
1- PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile
51 Miles
10 MPH Pace
43-52 MPH
Percent in Pace
77%
Posted Speed Limit
45 MPH
2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed
60 Speed -Related Accidents
0 Total Accidents
0 Expected Collision Rate

0.90 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rat

0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traft
3730 Vehicles Per Day
Lane Configuration
1 Lane Per Direction
Traffic Controls
Stop - Oak Glen
Crosswalks
None
Pedestrian/Bicycles
No/Few
Truck Traffic
Few
On -Street Parking
Permitted
Other
Areas of narrow roadway with no shoulders
4 ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment

1.58 Miles
Vertical Curve
Gradual -moderate up/downhill grades
Horizonhal Curve
Gradual -moderate 'S" curves
Lateral Visibility
Limited sight distance
Road Conditions
Fair
Sidewalk/Driveways
No/No
Street Lighting
Yes
Other
Undivided
Adjacent Land Use
Residential, Open Space
45 MPH
Speed Limit Change
No Change
Justification
Due to current 85th percentile speed & residential setting

CERTIFICATION
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify thatthis Engineering and Traffic Surveyfor the City of Yucaipa was performed undermy supervision. I certify that) am both experienced in performing surveys ofthis type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The surveyhas been conductedin strict compliance with guidelines contained in the most current versions ofthe California Vehicle Code (CVC)and the California Department ofTra nsportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions existing
on Yucaipa's streets.
_
RCE #53466 6/11/2026
Fred Min -agar
State Registration No. Date
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
i': MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase 11 SREE° % for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS RADRR

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA

CITY OF YUCAIPA
2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 101 Colorado Street
Wildwood Canyon Rd to 8th St
DATE: 6/11/2026
SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 12:15 PM - 1:15 PM
CHECK BY: P Navarro
1- PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile
42 Miles
10 MPH Pace
34-43 MPH
Percent in Pace
84%
Posted Speed Limit
35 2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed
60 Speed -Related Accidents
0 Total Accidents
0 Expected Collision Rate

0.90 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate

0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
2,455
Lane Configuration
1 Lane Per Direction
Trafic Conlrols
Stop - Wlldwood Canyon Rd / 81h St
Crosswalks
None
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Few/Few
Truck Traffic
No
On -Street Parking
Yes
Other
Areas of no parking anytime
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment

0.49 Miles
Vertical Curve
Several slight up/downhil grades
Horizontal Curve
Several gradua to moderate 'S" curves
Lateral Visibility
Limited sightdislance
Road Conditions
Fair & Good
Sidewalk/Driveways
No/Many
Street Lighting
Yes
Other
Undivided
Adjacent Land Use
Residential, Park
35 Speed Limit Change
No Change
Justification
Due to current 85th percentile speed & residential setting

CERTIFICATION
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify thatthis Engineering
a nd Traffic Surveyfor the City of Yucaipa was performed under my supervision. I certify tha t I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The surveyhas been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines
contained in the most current vers ions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) andthe California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniforn Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions emsting an Yucaipa's
streets.

RCE #53466 6/11/2026
Fred Minagar
State Registration No. Date
OMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

- 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SREE° r for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS RAUAfl

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA

CITY OF YUCAIPA
2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 102 Colorado Street
18th St to 9th St
DATE: 6/11/2026
SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 10:50 AM - 12:15 PM
CHECK BY: P Navarro
1- PREVAILING SPEED DATA
85th Percentile
36 10 MPH Pace
28-37
Percent in Pace
83%
Posted Speed Limit
35 2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed
60 Speed -Related Accidents
0 Total Accidents
0 Expected Collision Rate

0.90 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate

0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
1,867
Lane Configuration
1 Lane Per Direction
Traffic Controls
Stop - 8th St/ 9th St
Crosswalks
At Mission Dr / 91h St
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Few/Few
Truck Traffic
No
On -Street Parking
Yes
Other
Areas of no parking anytime
4- ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment

0.25 Miles
Vertical Curve
Several slight up/downhil grades
Horizontal Curve
Several gradua to moderate "S" curves
Lateral Visibility
Limited sight distance
Road Conditions
Fair & Good
Sidewalk/Driveways
Partal/Many
Street Lighting
Yes
Other
Undivided
Adjacent Land Use
Residential, Park
35 Speed Limit Change
No Change
Justification
Due to current85th percentile speed

CERTIFICATION
I, Fred Minagar do herby certify thatthis Engineering and Traffic Surveyfor the City of Yucaipa was performed undermy supervision. I certify that I am both expedencedin performing surveys ofthistypeand am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The surveyhas been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines
contained in the most current ve rs ions ofthe California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description of traffic conditions epsti ng on Yucaipa's streets.

RCE 453466 6/11/2026
Fred Minagar
State Registration No. Date
OMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Amill
v, MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

- 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED

ENFORCED
f for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS BY

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA AAOAA

CITY OF YUCAIPA
2026CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (E&TS) REPORT 103 Colorado Street
9th St to 10th St
DATE: 6/11/2026
SURVEY BY: Counts Unlimited
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:50 AM
CHECK BY: P Navarro
1- PREVAIUNG SPEED DATA
85th Percentile
40 10 MPH Pace
30-39
Percent in Pace
71 %
Posted Speed Limit
35 2 - ACCIDENT HISTORY
No. of Months Observed
60 Speed -Related Accidents
0 Total Accidents
0 Expected Collision Rate

0.90 (Speed Related Only)
Calculated Collision Rate

0.00 (Speed Related Only)
3 - TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic
1,386
Lane Configuration
1 Lane Per Direction
Traffc Controls
Sbp - 9th St/ 1 Oth St
Crosswalks
None
Pedestrian/Bicycles
Few/Few
Truck Traffic
No
On -Street Parking
Yes
Other
Areas of no parking anytime
4 ROADWAY FACTORS
Length of Segment
0,33 Miles
Vertical Curve
Several slight up/downhil grades
Horizontal Curve
Several gradua to moderate "S" curves
Lateral Visibility
Limited sight distance
Road Conditions
Fair & Good
Sidewalk/Driveways
No/Many
Street Lighting
Yes
Other
Undivided
Adjacent Land Use
Residential, Park
35 Speed Limit Change
No Change
Justification
Due to current85th percentile speed & residential setting

CERTIFICATION
I, Fred Mina gar do herby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Yucaipa was performed under my supervision. I certifythatI am both experienced in performing surveys of this
type and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional engineer. The surveyhas been conducted in strict compliance with guidelines
contained in the most current versions of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Department of Transportation Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate description oft4 iccOnd'rtionse�ipa's
streets.
=i� /I{,n
RCE #53466 6/11/2026
Fred Minagar
State Registration No. Date
OMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
i',= MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

SPEED
2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS RY
RADAR
CITY OF YUCAIPA. CA ENFDRCED
Appendix E
Radar Speed Survey Sheets
0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

IN
OPMUM
W
a
D
}
WN
I.L
N
U
LL
LL
L�
r
,n� Z
v W
Z2
22 W
W U)
Za
00 Zaa
Wdo
LIJ
❑ �Ga.

LU }
W O
C14
L
N 0 U
__
a a
c
c
a
a
ao o
_
n$
CL
�
g
V
r+
v
R
z
a LL
+� a w
C
K
=a
a
ry
L p e
a
C d CD s
OI
U V LL
.� x
�t
R
N C m R
� C
3 " O O
`o
if a
U N
L
j O
U
a�
co
_ _
a a
C
O
i
M
_
=
7 a
a
a
a
y
a
S
L
a
m
c
N
%1
j
Y
T
toy
7 N
N
V'
.�
V
.�
e
.�
� li
G :J u5
iN
N.-
�
>
c
F d
a
u
u
U co
M
J
m m
_
F-- LL
F H
W Vl
Y
:�000
O
000
000000
000
oo
- w-
vm� �r�r.rn
M�•J.r
M. o0000000000000
0o
c
J
H
li
-
�
Z
_
x
-
x x
x
x x
_
x
x x
x
x x
x x x
x6xxxxxxx
x x
-
xx
x
xxx
xxxxxxxxx
xxx
xxxx.

C
x x
x
x x
X
X
x x x x
x
x
xxxx
xx
x
x x x x
xx
xx
lxx xxx
xx
xx
x
x!x
x x x x
x x x
x x
x
-
-
uIu
w!a
ua�n
-
2 ACO

0 d
N
a
LW
r
a
W
D
U)
U
LL
9 I-- N
cis z
0w
Z2
�w
W (1)
W
Z Q
ao
Z Q Q
LJ 1 0 U
LLI ❑oo a
LLJ
U�
LU }
W O
to N }`
0-
r
N v0 U
i
4 a
a
z
�.
o'p
�
m
S
Le°-
rail
N
m
V
U?
L
K
K
s
x
T
m u
�D
Iq
Ix_
(L
a
s
a
9 r
m
S
E
L14
0 x V
C
m
> C
a O 0
-
U N
O
C)
a
a
2 c
S
S
2 m
o
-
a
a
;
-d a�
T
e-I
�
f
r
yl
-
v
e
G
A
o0.
d
J
o
a
m
21 ilj
0-
>
a
m Z =r ww
e
e
ea
a
m
_
o 0
0 0 0
,-, -
-
......
0 ........
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 o
O
I
C,
_
cc
3 x
-
x
x
xxx
x
x
x
xxx
x x
x
x
xxxx
xxxxx
xxx
'-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
x
x
x
x
x x
x -x
x
xx xx
xxx
xx
x
xxx xxxx
xxxx
xxx
x
x x x xxx
x x xx
xx -x x
x-x
' � h' � r N � N vns e- O O � w K ., -� �' cif
„ r
•� �
O Q,
N �- �
�- � � �
ssacp
swx�x
Mns
n�a
f
E7

W
a
a
D
W
_U
LL
LL
9 r N
06 Z
Ur W
Z_/ 2
W
W N
W
Z_ Q
a 0
ZaQ
W O U
W W Q
CL
I_W}
�LUO
N L }
NI—
M0-.0
y
Cl.
a
z
C
y
2 2
S
I� LL5 N
T
J�
K
0 r 'D
m q
a
a
_t
m
J x U
C
i
m i a �
j UI 00
7 U
N
— O
>
V N
s
0 �
a
a
U
S
S
m
7,
�I of
I
I
NI
ui
v
T
y
N
z
IL
s
:7
-
az
-
3 3
U
V
U
..

G
a
`y
�.
n m
u'
'-'
'�'
m
a
a
a
a
m
Lu,;T
a
a
ao

O O O O O Q
O 0 0 0 0
. --
0 0 0
GOO 0 0
•O
L
~
O
Tr
r
x
x x
x
_
xx x
x
x
x x x x
x x
x x
x
xxxx .x
xx
xx x
-
xxxxxxxxxx;xxxxxxxxxx
xx
_
I
'
x x!
x x x
xxx xx
xxx xx
1 x x
xxx xxxx
x
x x x x x
xx xx
x xxxxxxxxxxxxx
x
�omN�
-
Hl
k
-
-
-
-
x

W
Q
0 a
D
W
D
U)
U
LL
U.
06 Z
Ur W
Z�
W
W U)
zQ
cD o
ZaQ
L.0 U
lima
wj
LLI }
W O
N N }
NL f--
U
_ S S
L
m V N
km
d o
V
T
LL
�
H
uj
J _
a
o
CL
75,
-
?
p
..
a 'VC
eT.
5?-D
V
-
-
m 3 0 1= � i= r w n
¢'
u
x
v
x
x
x x
x x xx; xx
-
Zx
xxx
xxxxxxxx'xxxx
xxxixxx
xxxxxxxxxxx'xxxxx;x
i
w
x xxxx
xxxxxxxxx'xx
x
xx
xx x ,x
x x x x . x x
x xx x
xx'x
xx xxxx xx.x
��pp oxppxxxgx
b tQ0 N N N h h h h Y1 ,lJl M �t N '9 w M w h c�'f f M M t'� rl H V N N N ry N ry N ry � ^ 2 W
I--
a
D
}
W
LL
D
U)
_U
LL
LL
9 ,A
06 Z
/ ^ W
Z
W
W U)
W >-
Z Q
Z�
WQ
W0
0 W
w
W
�U
W
V J
W
N 6.

U)
O C
N w
U
i
L
r �)."I
C
-t
e
r,
G
L
V � �
W N

0. a
CL
a
O^ x Q LL
IT,
>
- H 7 O r
i
L
J
>
a
_
•
c
'w>-
ca
_'
n w
ry
u,
p rJl
W
ii
`c
Y
..
.. ..
d
I
Uy
�
J
W
y
W
X
y * N W
a
> _ G
_
y
LL
=
, n c, ., ', o
u �, ., a -.... ., ••• r• i T �•
.� •., y o• .•, r� u
„ c,
.,
n
., , u u
�, �.,
.., u
o u
$�
I
�I
i
x
3 x
x
x x
x
xx x
x
xxxxxxx
x jxx
-
2 xx xxxxxxxxxx
xx
-
xxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxx
1 x
°
a
xx
x
x x
x x x
is xx
xxx
xx
x xxxx
xxx
x X �x x X X x
x x X x
x x x x.x X X. x X
X x x X X x
In35
nip
79 !s7
4 1 J
a
'S2
1%
n A
�A
2 [AU

N
N
t
a
W
Q
a
D
}
�W

1.6 'D'^
V/
U
IL
LL
9 H N
06 z
o W
Z2
(D
Ul
W U)
W }
'Z Q
V 0
ZQ
W0
WW
0 �
W
F-
U
W
�W
N N
Q O
N y-
I ;.
n CL W
ii i
l
-L
s
T �p
J SI
L
m
a
yy�
;�
x Q W
In
L°
4)
j
W
rs
C-
IV
U
1<, O
-
31 v 9
t
k
!
75 t
u
J fD "_ 1- li F- 1- W VI
Q Q-
-
}
}I
i
x
x x
.$
x x x
x xx x
xx x;x x x x
x
x x!x {
li
Z
x x xx x x x x
x x'x x'
x, xxxxxxxxxxx
xxix xx�
x
w
_
x x.. x x
i
1x
x x x x xx
x x xx xxxx
xxxx.xxxxxxxx
x
x
I
x xxxx
xxx
cxxxxx Nxxx�xx px
pO �pp p yy pp�
V � � 1N0 � �D N � 4�'1 l Y�I � Y�'1 1n of � .1 f w H � � � H R � M �'f to i•1 �'f tt M M � H N N N N N N N N N N m _ � � � i
wv
2 W
F-
a
WN
I.L.

N
V
iTL
LL
9�
Z
V W
Z
W
W N
W >-
Z Q
0 ZQa
W O U
W Q
W
~ W >'
W O
N `}
N r�-U
I
N
Yl
i r1 S S
�
y 4
CL
I
I
r
T �
r, +�
�
J
r-
o
3 e
I
�
cc L' rn
_ _
y
v
I
aI 4I
w
r
w 4
0 c CL
O W
i5
N
n
L
N
V
Ir
%
J J 1- LL H H W N
Q d
u
G
�
I
I
N
ate'
x
i
9 x j
X
x
x x x
x xxxx x
x xx x x x'
x X X X X X W X
x
X X.X x X X X,X
xxxxxxxxxxXxx
x
�
i
f
a
I
�
�
x
w
x xl
--
x x k;
------Y--
xx xx WX
I
XI
xxxx' XX x xx
.
x
x X X XXXX x x x
xx x x
xx x� x x x x x x x:x x x
r
i0 10 b .0 i0 iA h N Y, N h N N H 4 n H 4.1 � w Y 4 M A h h '' A q 11�
�,SSiffiLS��x��tS
-Si'3Y�"Y'73,9
17S
1�
I
2 U)
M
a
W
Q
a
D
W
Cl)
U
LL
LL
'06 z
V W
NZ 2
R W
W N
uj
'Z Q
V 0
ZaQ
W 0 CJ
UJ
�w=
W �-
W O
CN
N w U
Il •{
N
V
S
4; d �1
�
� W �i
1''
al
a•I
C
a
r,
1 a
S =
I
A
6] V ~
C
-
a
a.

V U
m
m G o
_
N _ a `o r
_ N
0 �
H
O y =
a
K
�
of
✓�
,n
3 L�
iJ�
V
UI
J
U
I
x X
X x
x
x xxx
x X x x
x x xx.Xx
xxx x
'xxxxxx
xxxxxx -
x!xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
i
I
i
-
c----•-
9 x
W
----------
x
-_._-. _._
x
x
___. _._._.._
x x 'x
xx I
x x x x I
f ,
x xx
x x x
xpxpp xx xx
x xxlxx
x x x x xx x x x'.
xx xxxxx xx'.x
pp
N N N N ry N V N m .- � � 7 m A tp YI
L
��f

W
H
^�^
CL
D
W
V
LL
LL
06 Z
Ur W
Z2
ERW
W fn
W }
/Z Q
V Q
ZaQ
W O tU
ova
wa
LU >-
W 0
N
N U
c
i
I
i
L
=
a
¢ )
,r
~
_
a
a-
O,
Oo ap
N
rn
q •=
i
�,
J
c
a r
A
n p r
O
y
f-
L
I
A.

M,
a
a
We e I I
I
�
J
I
a
vlu
-
V
PS G
a Z
o
co Ci 4
=,
V
-
U
7 �
V
�
K
Y ry
• J
V
V
.. y - 9
d
m 3 a a i= �° w rn
u000u
coo ci � r�r, u, ri;�a,a,.x r-'-
uu, r, r�--
uoo ao
oo
ool000
I
or.,
., ��•.,
•, �o
�
�
N
Q
r
a
O
x x
x
i
x xxx
x xxx
x
x
Y
x x X x x x
x x x
x x 'xxxxxxx
xXi.x
x X x X Xx X x x xxxx
x xxx
d
i
i
I
�
w
x
x
�
x x
x x x
x x x x
x x x x x
x
x x xx xx xx
Xx xx
x x
xxx x xp x xp x
x x x x
x x x'x
px'. px, mx p
t
�fNt 41 h I,N] h N N � A 'S "J 3 `� ti �! a 1O� 1'1 M t", n e�i M YNf r•f R SC t�i N N N N N N N R= m' � � � � � ^ O T® h W a w
2!x
212
3 9 0:

Y
7 3
::

SIR
X 9
x:�
R R
n 9
oo
2 Nli

w
a
D
Nw
I.L
'❑'^
v/
U_
LL
LLL
r
06 a
Z
w
w
Z
a
Z
w
w
_❑
1�
U
co
N
O
N
.N
v
_
d
x =
x
x
x
T
m
U
•'
v
�
v m m
•
>
c
tll O o
�
c °- `o
-
7 U
—
O
�
o:

U
_
r
J
9 x
a
x
a
f
CJ�
a n
n
0 W
T
10 �7
I �Fj
vi V,
H
CL
CD
p
L) J)
— a U 10
u
u
_
u
_
U CC
3 ui c c
m y
J m 0 r LL
r r W Vi
>
uQ
��

O O O O O
O O p 0 0�
— Y Y
aT. 1� •C �
•a, �,^ R
•il •il — �! 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O
N
Q
-
r
0 a
cc
x
x
x x
x
_
xx x
x
x
xxxx
xxxx
xxx
x
xxxxx
xxxx
xxx
-
xx
xxxxx
xxxx
xxxx
x
xI
C
X x
—
x X
X x
X
x x x
x
x x X X X x
x
x
x x
xxxxxxxx
xx
xxxxx
xxxxxxxx
xxxxx
FTT-
TT
--------------
TT
NJ
w
H
a
V
O
U)
Q

VI
i
a
W
Q
a
}
W
/D�
w/
_U
/LL
9 V)
od z
W /^ C
NVZ G
LL W
W U)
W
za
(Do
ZQQ
L11 O U
❑oCL
Up
W >-
W O
N U)
N U
f
Z
Y
!
c
x
=
v
a
a
a a
O
ml
Nll
V �
MI
O)
101 �
M
T �
NI
K1
L �
2 `
b
^I
M

O E Q LL
01I
x U
O
Fr
en
m
= m
>
N O O
^ c a `O
0 U
v O
U n
?7
P
V
x
x
Fi
L
n
W
F
IM
M
Sk
a
a
Q
..

E
a ti
a
u
u
u
a y E
>
V
y
J m
C O

O /- LL H H W W,
Q
0-
----------
O
J
H
O
'e
�
Q
K,
x
xx
x
_
x xxxx
x
x
xxx xxxx
x
x
x x x x x
x x x x
x
x
xxxxiXXXXXXXXXXXXXXI
x
I
=
x
x x
x
x x x
x x
x x x
x x x xxx
xxx
xxxx
xxx
x x x x
x
x
xxxxx-xx�xxxxxx
xxx
=
--
s
.d

1 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II FOR srrjr for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS A DAA
j" CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA 71
Appendix E ::-
24-Hour Machine Counts (ADT) Traffic Volume Data
(0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

:- 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II ENFORLEO for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS RAAfl

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
C Ry of '1'uC3iP3
13th Street
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PC) Box 1178
Corona, CA 928,78

Page 1 ends

8.: ~venue E - Oak Glen Road (951 ) 268-6268 i uC001
24 Four Directional Volume Count email: counts@countsunlimited com Site Code: 231-26511 Dote Start 501 26
Start 5/19126 Northbound Hour Totals `_•outhbound Hour Totals Combined'otal, T— T.- U—inn GIN— AAevninn ::Rammn Mnminn Lfts vin Morninn Of?Prmmn Mom!nn ».ftEmOUn 12:Co
3 17
_
9 12:15
1 12
0 15
12:30
2 8
0 11-:45
1 10
7 47
_
12 4
45 11
01:0C
0 9
3 13
01:15
1 16
1 9
01:30
0 6
i
13 01:41•
1 17
2 46
9 9
8 44
10 _
02:00
0 14
0 8
02:15
1 18
0 12
02:30
0 14
0 22
02:45
0 20
1 66
0 is
0 57
1 L'
03:00
^_
30 1
32 03:15
1 48
0 19
03:30
0 39
1 66
03:45
0 28
3 145
2 54
4 171
-
5 04:00
2 34
4 20
04:15
1 20
420
04:30
4 32
1 16
04:45
0 34
7 120
4 13
17 24
=9
05:Do
1 15
9 17
05:15
0 22
4 18.
05:30
4 25
6 17
05:45
8 30
13 92
6 20
2c,
72 42
164
05:00
5 27
10 _6
06:15
8 22
11 18
06:30
10 20
10 is
06:45
8 12
31 81
iD
14 41
7_
72 154
07:00
23 9
1s
25 07:15
34 14
21 26
07:30
37 8
14 23
07:45
48 14
142
45 25
10 75
°=
217
11_9
48:00
70 14
47 16
D8:15
24 13
44 16
M:30
16 12
24 8
08 45
16 8
126
; 7
14 7
129
49 96
04:00
16 7
10 9
09:15
9 5
8 6
0"a:20
10 6
6 e
09:45
14 4
49 2
6 E'2
27 d1
49 10M
14 10
7 10:15
18 4
10 10:30
10 5
6 _
10:45
11 3
53 17
12 43
14 93
21 11:00
7 6
15 11:1`_•
12 2
16 1
1114
12 n
10 1
1145
18 0
49 101
12 '
1 53
61 102
16 Otal
483
14U 4bJ
Combined
1223
1 L 3
Total
AM Peak
07:15
ol.
189
-
P.H.F.

0.675
PM Peak
03:15
Vol.
-
149
P.H.F.

0.776
Percentag

39.5°%

60.5°%
4C'74;�DT
ADT 2.366
AA.DT 2.366
1143 1143 2366
07:45
140 -

0.745
03:00
171

0.w

37.8°% 62.2%
0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SPEED / rlT� fNFOflCED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS Rr

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

CnY of i ucaipa PO Box 1178
Avenue E Corona. CA 92878
9; i uca pa boulevard - t6th Street (yF 1) 26&626$ i UCOO:
24 Hour Directional '�!olume Count Site Cade: 231-_^6511 - email.- counts@countsuniimiter] corn
Dote Start: 5!t9!26
Start .14;26 Eastlmnd Hour Totals ..es;tcund Hour Totals Com�iinedTotals T,— - T— 6An+n Lftsm r.r,n ft— -.n `.1—"F-1nrr n, ftp-mmn Unminn L.REmnon 12:15
4 31
4 "
12:30
1 19
4 19
12:45
1 21
7 10b
_
16 11
-
01:00
1 20
9 15,
01:15
125
3 15
0130
0 26
_
14 01.45
0 29
3 109
_
20 16
-
19 02:00
0 26
'_6
02:15
2 34
-9
02:30
0 33
02:45
1 31
3 124
C,
t'_ 1
10 03:00
2 24
54 03:15
3 28
1 40
03:30
10 46
0 40
03:45
1 31
6 129
4 26
IE0
14 _.
04:00
4 31
_

3.4 04:15
6 31
3 26
04:30
12 28
5 42
04:45
2/
28 49
TIE
_
34 12
13•?
61 EG
05:00
2 33
9 25
05:15
11 24
_
05:30
15 35
9 30
05:45
20 2-2
46 I_O
-
21 30
97 75
-1-
06:00
11 48
7 22
06 15
14 20
13 13
06:30
16 ^_3
26 1"
06:45
24 23
65 114
20 14
66 EI
131
07:00
12 20
19 14
07:15
14 19
__
2'
07:30
24 17
36 13
07:45
22 22
72 78
32 6
109
`:

I
134
08:00
28 24
28 9
08:15.
24 14
32 12
08:30
17 20
26 12
08:45
11 20
60 78
25 10
111
-
191
='
09:00
9 15
16 09 15
14 10
12 1_

01.4:30
15 6
16 09 45
15 5
38 _10
_0
1 17
G E.
10:00
15 13
17 10:15
20 13
17 10:30
15 16
1 10:45
20 `_
70 3F,
18 '
_p
11 13n
47 11:00
12 6
1G
'
11:15
16 3
--
11:30
34 6
=0
11:45
24 2
1b6
17 1 27
9 1 170
26 1
Total
542
IUbi lub/
Combined
1609
1609
Total
AM Peak
07:30
Vol.
98 P.H.F.

0.875
PM Peak
03:30
Vol.
139
P.H.F.

0.755
Percentag
o,

33.7,E

66.3%
e

ADTIAADT
ADT 3 059
AA.DT 3,059
0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
y.bt. 8t4 =-- - 1110 7S1
1450 1-50 3054
07:30
1:8

0.869
03:00
180
0,741

40.4% 59.6%

- 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II ENFORCED for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS BY
CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RAOAfl
Counsn Iml t U l t d
City of Yucaipa
Bryant Street
8; Date Avenue - , uc31pa Boulevard
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
nc
YUC003
Site Code: 231-26511
Date Start V19126
:,tart 511912E Northbound amour Totals Southbound Hoar Totals Combined Totals T, Tia RAnmi— Un Lfha 1'rm - KAn Lf1—n
12:07
4 63
(
-
12 1E
2 61
E:
12,10
6 64
_
r,
12:45
2 70
14 26±
1 31
E4�
01:00
0 74
l�4
01:is
4 90
01:30
3 89
2 76
01:45
1 it5
_
'EE
0 111
10 ==

1.3 75'
02:00
_
100
1 94
02:15
6 ttt
0 92
02:30
2 103
_
152
0245
5 102
:5
='6
3 150
49E.
21 0300
3 98
4 126
03:15
_
104
3 F6
03:30
4 8.8
1 123
0345
4 93
t3
363
4 136
12 473
2;
ES1;
04:00
2 102
8 129
04:15
4 95
10 106
04:30
_
114
14 104
04 45
4 110
12 421
16 118
4E
455
60 EEG
05:00
6 116
14 125
05:1 _`•
14 115
14 124
05:30
16 118
19 102
05:45
26 99
62 448
36 96
53 145
-97
06:00
26 94
26 94
06:15
26 74
40 102
06:30
42 75
42 74
06:45
34 79
322
68 64
178
354
356
E76
07:D0
122
64 78
100
07:15
117
36 111
76 07:30
122
r50
147
99 07:45.
146
40 507
20D
131
87 467
384
974

5.64 03:00
98 82
72 08:15
66 37
82 50
08:30
70 48
66 08:45
78 2
3t2
171
73 56
323
230
635
401
09:00
57 1 •
54 16
09:15
71 77
36 09:30
52 26
66 32
09:45
45 2
225
91 70
2 267
108
492
197
10:00
48 8
7F.
18 10:15
75 10
7E,
20 10:30
56 16
E4
14 10:45
61 240
42 56
14 2FF
F6
506
108
11:00
63 7
66 E,
11:15
85 8
99 4
11:3G
74 -
79 14
1 t:=E.
70 12
292
24 98
7 354
646
72 Total
SS/,7
3159 lbld :.1_N
1 jttlb 2uS1 :Sly: 34U11
Combined
5037
5037
5826
5826 10863
Total
AM Peak
07:00
-
07:15
-
'iol.
507
-
471
-
P.H.F.

0.868

0.801
PM Peak
-
04:45
-
02:15
'vol.
- -
459 - -
-
520 - - - -
P. H. F

0.972

0.855
Percentag

37.3%

62.7%
349%

65.1%

ADTTAADT
ADT 10.863
AADT 10,863
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

-: 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II EREafl raCED
for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS BY

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
Counts Unlimited, Inc. Pace I
City of 'Yucaipa PO Box 1178
Gak Gten Road Corona, CA 92878
8? Cherry Croft Drive -'Nest City Limits (95 1) 268-6268 YUC005 24 Hour Directional 'Volume Count email Counts@countSUnllnllted Com Site Code: 231-265! 1 Dare Start: 5119.�26
Start 5119126 Eastbound Hour Taal vVestbaurd Hour Totals Combined Totals Ti... T,.a \fin ; Ih. I.A.vnin ARa !An. Lf•.am Unm U GRam , 12:00
1 12
_
16 12,15
1 11
G
1i
12:30
0 19
0 16
12:45
3 13
5 0
15 ,
c•$
7 IT-
0 110 0
0 9
0 11
01:15
0 16
0 01:30
0 10
0 19
WAS
0 1.8
0 53.
0 15
0 0 1-7
0200
0 7
0 20
02:15
1 19
0 13
02:30
1 16
0 1E..
0245
1 15
3 57
0 11
117
03:00
0 10
1 20
03:15
0 12
0 15
03:30
0 11
0 24
0345
0 20
0 5'
_
_ 1Ic
04:00
0 12
8 7
04:15
0 -
0 13
04:30
0 12
1 16
0445.
0 20
0 54)
10 1=
10 =
05:00
0 13
3 1:
05:is
3 13
5 7
05:30
1 16
2 1
0546
_
14 6
56 8
c
24 06:00
_
6 7
1;
06:15
5 12
7 1F.
06:30
10 16
7 1'
06:45
10 19
27 53
6 C,
_7
=
4 10-1
07:00
4 7
7 07:15
6 6
17 8
07:30
8 13
15 4
0745
5 12
23 38
17 9

5.6 08:00
14 10
14 6
08:15
6 11
11 4
08:30
9 13
11 9
08 45
14 9
45 43
14 5
_SO
24 �5
04:00
10 9
13 09:15
16 5
16 09:30
16 7
2 09:45
9 151
23 16
17 15
99 _c
10:00
13 6
7 10:15
22 0
11 1
10:30
7 ,_
17 -
1045
12 3
54 11
16 151
-
105 L_
11:00
12 3
17 Z.
11:15
16 3
10 1
11:2.0
9 0
17 0
11:45
14 1
51 7
17 C.

E I
1 112 6
Total
265
499 265 499
324
449 324 1-_ 569 b48
Combined
764
764
773
773 1537
Total
AM Peak
09-30
- -
07:15
- - -
"01.
60 63
-
P.H.F.

0.682

0.926
PM Peak
04:45
-
02:45
Vol.
61 -
70 P.H.F.
0-775

0.729
Percentag

34.7%

65.3%

41.9%

58.1%
e

ADT/AADT
ADT 1.537
AADT 1,537
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

. ; 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II ENfOR ED %riser for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS RADAR

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
C U I LI I Pace I
City of lucalpa
Oak Glen Road
B; Bryant Street - Cherry Croft Dme
24 Hour Directional ': olume Count
Ounts 11Imlte , nC.

PO Box i 178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268
ernaIL [email protected]
YUC004
Site Code: 231 26511
Date Start 5/ 19126
Start 51192E East:xund -io-jr `Aleszbound Hour Totals C.omxnedTo:als T:... T,.m Flr.m inn r_hnm- 1.q--- _ft -rvv.n AA-- LfP. n F-1n L!!PtTlYtn tiAt]T Aff*m nn

12.00 1
4 44
12:15
_
4 4
12:30
3 49
1 332
12:45
2 30
8 158
1 41
10 151
18 309
01:00
1 27
0 34
01:15
0 37
2 29
01:30
0 36
0 4-.
01:45
0 36
1 13r
0 44
_
152
3 288
02:00
1 44
0 41
02:15
1 58
1 4t
02:30
1 53
1 36
02:45
1 51
4 =01'.
1 36
3 15.4
7 360
03:00
0 52
4 50
03:15
0 42
0 42
03:30
_
50 i
54 03:45
0 60
2 _ _14
4 24
_
170
11 374
04:00
0 43
11 30
04:15
1 47
8 36
04:30
0 46
5 32
04:45
0 43
1 179
7 30
'1
128
32 307
05:00
3 59
12 36
05:15
4 5'
14 37
05:30
3 50
14 05:45
7 46
17 20
17 C.

E7
125
74 332
06:00
9 31
25 06:15
6 51
29 ; 0
06:30
16 37
40 '=
06:45
22 52
53 171
40 19
134
129
187
300
07:00
14 34
37 20
07:15
22 24
57 21
07:30
15 32
63 16
07:45
32 33
c.3
=
42 2
19y
79 282
202
08:00
40 37
43 14
08:15
25 25
40 21
08:30
30 33
42 14
08:45
36 28
131
__
30 11
155
60 285
183
09:00
24 26
40 7
04:15
39 119
39 6
09:30
31 22
32 13
09:45
34 10
126
77 36
7 147
33 275
110
10:00
26 16
27 4
10:15
37 5
25 5
10:30
17 10
32 10
10:45
31 5
ill
26 41
8 125
2 236
63 11:00
26 13
36 1
11:15
32 6
37 11:30
32 4
_'1E'
1 11:45
38 n
130
-
V,,
1 1 147
277
34 i otal
Cornimned
Total
AM Peak
Vol.

P.H.F.

PM Peak
'-'a-
P.H.F
Percentag
e
A DT1AA DT
7;y 173y
_31=
08:00
131

0.819
hr,y I�.�4
_319
02: 15-
214

0.922
2 9°-6 71.1%
ADT 4 550 AADT 4,55A
I 1.

I_IIV 17 1-1J
2232
2232
07:15
- -
205

0.813
02:45
-
182

0.843

45.7%

54.3%
Ivan rev_
4550
r, MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II fr for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS
1" CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA

ENFORCED
RY
flADAR
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

Pig' t
City of 1'ucalpa
PO BOX 1178.

Wild -wood Canyon Road
Corona, CA 92878
Br Bryant Street - Holmes Street
(951) 268-6268
fuC00E
24 Hour Directional '.''olume Count
[email protected] site Code: 231 26511
Date
Start 5119i'-6
Start 5119126 Eastbound
Hour Totals dlestbound HourTot3ls Combined-otals
T...a 7— KAnm;— ^_hemnnn
EA --inn Lft— PA-- :.fl— KAruT•im LhGmnnn Vnminn
;% ft PrnrAn

12.00 0
50 4
50 1215
4 --4
5 50
12:30
_
55 _
F 1
12:45
1 49
7 _O6
3 48
14 209
21 417
01:00
_
36 _
E0
01 15
4,
1 56
01:30
0 52
3 53
01:45.
0 =
5 11
E0
9 221;
14 -1b
02,00
0 °.1
2 60
02:15
0 2
69 0230
0 2
62 02:45
0 0
"_=
0 F_4
F
255
483
0300
0 _-
_
58 03:15
_
59 _
%
03:30
0 60
3 an
0345
1 87
3 2b
6 66
15 244
1e
ED7
04:00
4 72
9 E-1
04:15
0 65
10 44
04:30
_
84 -
"9
04:45
_
68 E.
78 s=
235
47 524
05:00
_
70 14
60 05:15
0 58
23 70
05:30
6 50
27 68
05:45
16 59
244
119
°t
06:00
14 70
06:15
8 62
5z4G
06:30
14 59
64 40
06:45
22 =
`_`_
249
63 3E.
211
161
269
410
07:00
42 44
94 40
07:15
46 5.8
105
40 07:30
34 56
112
32 07:45
44 42
try
2G0
116
34 42
1_i
= —
'4n
08:00
48 58
70 26
08:15
44 50
72 26
08:30
45 26
50 12
08:45.
51 24
169
15E
63 14
2`+i
O°
445
09:D0
40 29
50 10
09:15
30 18
E 0
16 09:30
46 2.z
50 16
09:45
39 24
_ ;
9'a
56 12
2GE
10:00
34 a
10:15
32 57
6 10:30
33 -
44_
9 10:45
44 4
or
8 214
_ -
11:00
31 56
12 11:15
33 -
5o
8 11:30
42 =
52 1 1:45
41 -
%17
1!
49 4
207
_
354
50 Total
905
_ -
tt�
I_t it`Jb Ia 11
Combined
3081

30.3 1
3624
3624
Total
AM Peak
0800
-
07:00
-
','W.
189
- -
427
P.H.F.

0.909

0.920
PM Peak
-
03:45 -
-
04:45
1/01.
308 -
-
276
P.H.F.
0 885

0.885
Percentag

29.4 %

70.6%

46.9%

53.1 e

ADT/AADT
ADT 6.705
AADT 6,705
0MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
o0U3 41ul
6705

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase 11 SPEED for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS
0104,01" CITY ^0%fHe-A10A CA
RADAR
Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page I
City of I ucatpa PC) Box 1 178
Wildwood Canyon Road Corona, CA 92878
5; Mesa Grande Drive - Oak Mesa Drive (951) 268-6268 UC007 24 Hour Directional Volume Count email: [email protected] Site Code: 131-26511 Dave start 5/19!26
Start cd 1 C.; Eastbound Hour Totals Alestbound Hour Totals Combined Totals I --- --- .. —.-- U—i—
12:C0
3 45
0 -kq
12 -15
1 45
0 12:30
1 41
3 1 2:45
2 4 6
a.
178
0 1 E3
11 ?4 i
01:00
3 27
0 40
01 15
3 0
.9
01:30
0 4
1 46
01 455
0 42
150
0 44
1 179
7 329
02:00
0 42
1 44
02:15
3 5.5
1 55
02:30
1 41
1 52
02:45
0 62
4 203
1 40
4 191
8 394
03:00
0 63
0 46
03:15
1 46
1 43
03:30
0 61
2 so
0145
2 69
3 2 31 9
5 37
8 176
11 415
04:00
1 70
2 44
(34: 11,
6 51
7 25
04:30
3 74
8 04:45
5 251
10 17,
42 424
05:00
3 54
9 05:15
1 513
18 05:30
7 38
14 44
05AS
12 42
190
- -0
06:00
J-)
76 22
26 06:15
10 47
Z-12
40 06 30
22 55
41 23
06:4 5
26 35
70 213
53 25
lip
OTCO
28 38
88 07:15
46 38
92 26
0730
39 37
80 17
07:45
46 36
159
149
80 21
340
102
499
251
08:00
38 48
48 19
08: 15
42 44
48 16
08:30
43 24
47 11
ORAS
45 22
'71
1 Z-Z
46 e
189
56 09:00
44 2-1
32 10
044: 1 C
25 20
42 16
09:30
30 15
39 IQ
09:45
34 17
1•
74 38
11 119
10:00
31 14
'.16
1 i
10: 15
30 a
44 E
10:30
25 6
46 4
10:45
40 A
'3
40 7
1-6
:p
292
11:00
27 4
11:15
34 34
4 1
46 1
11:45
3i--
1-13
13,
276
Total
651
1645 611 1 1r4r
1-141
I-;u_: ].:- 1 rli
Combined
�696
2696
2643
Total
-
AM Peak
08 is
- - -
07:00
" OL
177
340
P.H.F.

0.922

0.924
PM Peak
-
03:45
01:45

1.'.ol
-
264
195
P.H F

0.892

0.81qe
Percent3g

31.6%

68.4%
470%

53.0%
e

ADT'AADT
ADT 5.339
A-ADT 5.339
1911h
1';
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II ENfOR0E0 for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS RAOAR

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
Counts Unlimited, Inc. Page 1
City of i Uca:p3 PO Brix 1 178
Wildwood Canyon Road Corona, CA 92878
03k Mesa Drive - Oak Glen Road (951) 268,6268 vUC008
:= Hour Directional'•r'olume Count email. [email protected] site Code: 231-26511 Date start 5119126
Start 511912e Eastbound HourTctals 'Neslbound Hour Totals Combined Totals r....e. nv RA—i Ift. e.1-- Lf " Gftomrvui U.-'— Gfter e'n 12:DC
1 31
0 _
12:15
2 27
_
12:30
0 39
35 12:45
2 27
5 124
0 25
_
107
8 231
01:00
1 14
i
^o
01:15
1 24
0 35
01:30
0 28
0 25
01:45
0 35
2 10e
0 32
1 121
3 227
02:00
1 29
1 44
02:15
2 35
0 38
02:30
0 2.8
1 41
02:45
0 50
-
142
0 23
2 14E
5 2E8
03:00
0 40
1 40
03:15
0 40
1 33
03:30
0 49
1 33
03:45
2 45
_
174
1 26
.1
134
6 2C8
04:00
1 43

1. 34
04:15
4 40
4 21

04.30 3
49 5
37 04:45
4 31
12 163
5 54
15 14E
27 2zc
05:00
3 37
7 _
05:15
2 33
8 36
05:30
7 28
2 1
0545.
it
35 23
133
7 2
27 117
50 250
06:00
8 3.5
14 21
06:15
10 27
15 26
06:30
20 37
28 11
06:45
12 21
50 12_
38 32
95 91
145
214
07:00
23 27
68 23
07:15
42 25
60 16
07:30
32 21
77 18
07:45
31 24
__
45 12
08:00
32 31
40 15
08:15.
30 27
27 10
08:30
37 12
37 13
08:45
31 15
1_0
c='
__
c
125
44 _5-
129
09:00
26 16
31 i'
09:15
17 7
20 10
09:30
18 8
36 7
09:45
25 5
b i

2.r.
24 e
111
34 197
70 10:00
21 7
23 `.
10:15
24 20
10:30
26 WAS
24 95
_=
24 5
i^°
17 203
11:00
22 4
11 11:15
21 11
20 -
11:30
20 -
28 11:45
30 4?
28 48
Total
6-1y
i__7 1_�4 1__n
`_3U 7.: __• OiU IU?�
Combined

1.5c
1•_55
1875 187S
Total
AM Peal:
07 15
07:00 -
:b1.
137
250 -
P.H.F.
0,615

0.812
PM Peak
-
0245
- 01:45
Vol.
-
179
- 155
P.H.F

0.895

0.881
Percentag
3s 9°'0

66.19;
44 8% 55.244
vDT+AADT
-',DT 3.730
u--DT _1.730
3730
aMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II ENFORCED for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS RADRR
1 CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

Page 1 ends

City of i uca+Pa
PO Box 1178
Colorado Street
Corona, CA 92878
S1 Enoch .A enue
(951) 268-6268
r'UC011
24 Hour Dtrecbanal Volume Count
email counts@countsunhmited corn
Site Code: 231-26511
Date Start 5!20J26
Start 5/20f26 Northbound
hour Totals: Southbound
Hour Totals Com1?med Totals
IA -A nwe.....,...
ti..,.i-- A wa.,....,,, )4,— I Lf— n
k4 LfT-- M—nn Aftwmnnn

12.00 _
25 0
14 12:15
2 12
1 10
12:30
_
18 0
15 12:45
0 1f
73 0
17 1
EF
7 129
01:00
1 1P
4 _
01:15
0 19
0 17
01:30
1 14
0 16
01:45
4 2
82 t
34 5
49 11
171
02-00
0 36
0 30
02:15
1 _In
1 16
02:30
0 22
1 22
02:45
0 26
t G
0 29
-
49 3
205
03:00
1 30
25 03:15
0 22
1 22
03:30
0 28
0 24
03:45
3 54
=
0 26
_
102
6 236
04:00
2 21
2 24
04:15
0 25
_
12 04:30
0 18
0 20
04:45
30 4
94 -
19 _
75 10
1P9
05:00
2 26
0 :4
05:15
0 25
-
05:30
4 22
0 -
0545
8 16
c•9
6 --='-
06:00
6 16
5 10
06:15
8 10
9 17'
06-30
14 17
14 16
M:45
17 14
45 57
i7
12 07:00
25 17
-4
11 07:15
34 17
48 C.
07-30
35 10
68 11
07:45
22 3
:_
53 10
2 0_
4t
319
08:00
15 7
66 E
08:1`.
21 11
In
E
08:2A
24 5
13 08:45.
16 13
r 9
=,f.
16 e
1 1 /
--
196
51 09:00
10 17
13 09:15
15 13
14 09:30
8 8
10 1
09:45
17 7
50 45
i0
3 -,
14 97
59 10:00
8 6
12 4
10:15
12 5
20 4
10:30
16 16
0 10:45
16 2
52 15
21 3
69 11
121
26 11:00
14 1
21 11:15
20 2
8 '_
11 :30
22 2
14 1
11 11
10 1
66 6
'0
Z
1 63
9 129
15 i otal
44J
tO''d 44J told
ioo
oso I -
Combined
1232
1232
1223
1223 2455
Total
AM Peak
0700
-
07:15
- -
'iol.
116
-
235
-
P.H.F.
0 829

0.864
PM Peak
-

03.00 -
02 45
'd'aa.
-
134
-
11)5
P.H.F.

0.620

0.875
Percentag
e
36 0,,,
r;4 00,E

46.4%

53.6%
ADTtAADT
".CT 2455
AADT 2.455
1F( wMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

= 2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II ENEDR ED for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS BY
9 " CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA RADAR
Counts Unlimited. Inc. Pagel
City of Yucaipa PO Box 1178
Colorado Street Corona, CA 92878
Bi 8th Street - 9th Street (951) 268 6268 YUC010
24 Hour Directional 'iolume count email [email protected] Site Code: 231-26511 Date Start 5120!26
Start 5c .2E Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals 'Ao� che..n ....r. Il...m.r.. . kAnm Af— A_Sn Af-- n M-- GRPrnnnn 1200
3 17
0 12:15
0 -
0 13
U.30
0 16
-
15 12:45
1 14
4 52
0 20
01:00
0 10
01:15
0 12
0 12
01:30
1 4
0 10
01:45
1 18
2 47
0 14
1 -_
02:00
0 12
0 20
02:15
1 14
0 16
02:30
1 14
1 18
0245
1 15
3 RID0
15 1
03:00
0 19
1 19
03:15
1 17
1 20
03:30
0 22
1 20
03:45
2 42
100
0 16
3 75
6 17==
04:00
0 20
3 22
04:15
0 16
4 12
04:30
0 16
4 8
04:45
1 20
72 3
10 14
52 15
=�
05:00
0 20
3 12
05:15
0 19
6 6.
05:30
2 16
4 12
OS s5
5 L3
7 73
6 10
19 42
06:00
_
23 7
11 06:15
6 18
1 1'
06:30
7 12
2D
12 06:45
9 17
24 70
i2
9 -_
-4
115
07:00
12 14
20 5
07:15
8 14
36 11
07:30
7 10
59 13
07:45
18 11
,'4
9 54
11 1,�
08:00
9 7
52 10
08:15
15 10
24 08:30
23 h
16 _
08:45
13 -
EA
10 6
102
_`
162
56 09:00
6 11
13 4
09:15
4 a
16 4
09:30
7 11
10 3
09:45
12 =-
37 9
'
48 14
77 51
10:00
3 8
10:15
7 `+
12 3
10:30
7 14
0 10:45
12 4
=_
19 11
1 45
9 74
28 11:00
8 g
4 11:15
11 10
11'30
20 '0
1 11:45
12 6i
9 2
2 53
9 104
18 Total

7.bb
bi'd __c� my
_tit
Combined
877
877
990
Total
AM Peak
07:45
-
07:15
VOL
65 201
-
P.H.F.

0.707

0.652
PM Peak
03:15
-
03:15
a.
101
_
78 P.H.F.

0.601

0.8pe
Percentag

29.4°

70.6%

51.2%
4e.8%

ADTIAADT
ADT 1.867
AADT 1,867
-luf 4CL, IQ� I IV_
990 1867
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase II SAEED

ENFORCED
%, %� for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS RADAR

CITY OF YUCAIPA, CA
Counts Unlimited. Inc. Pace I
City of i ucaipa r 1 60r 11 7 E. UC00y
Colorado Street Corona. CA 92878 Site Code, 231-2E5116
81 9th Street - 1G1h Street Phone: 951 268-6268 Date Start: 5127126 24 Hour Directional Volume Count email: counts'A,counts .unllmrteo.ccm Start 5P_7126 Eastbound Hour Totals Nestbcund Hour Totals Combined Totals — .,- +we...— II— I* kA, eRo 11.4xn -Fh— A..t—rt nn Lff mn'n 12 DO
4 0
7 12:is
0 9
0 10
12:3^,
_
12 1
E
1245
1 'a
7 3•b
1 10
_
33 4
71 01:00
0 0
0115
1 =
0 E
060
1 3
01:45
0 02:X
_
1E
0 E
02:15
0 15
0 16
02:30
1 10
7 02:45
1 K,
13 03:00
0 17
0 14
03:15
0 1'
_
11 03:30
0 10
0 12
0345
0 26
0 70
4 10
E
47 6
11-
04:%'
0 19
13 04:15
0 19
-
9 04:30
1 14
1_
04:45
1 20
_
72 _
E
13 40
1I=

05.D0
1 15
5 9
05:15.
1 19
6 10
05:30
3 19
E•
10 0545
-
_
-
75 7
E
2E
35 110
06:00
5 17
11 13
06:15
2 15
14 4
06:30
_
15 1717
06:45
4 14
13 61
14 10
E5
44 1�5
07:00
6 11
13 7
07:15
6 8
21 4
07:30
11 12
25 °
08:00
6 3
26 08:15
8 9
15 4
08:30
9 6
13 1
08:45
6 5
29 24
10 5
12 P3
3 -
09:00
4 8
9 7
09:15
6 7
14 1
09:30
12 4
6 0
09:45
5 2
27 21
1i
5 13
10:D0
8 7
10 0
10:15
9 1
13 3
10:30
8 5
9 1
10:45
12 0
-
i3
14 3
11:00
8 -
11:15
4 3
9 0
11:30
3 1
6 1
11:45
5 19
12 5
0 2P'4715
Total
1/y
44� 1/y 4L"4
bI

3.0 oru .,__ --._ __•
Combined
678
678
708
706 1386
Total
AM Peak
1000
-
07:15
-
`: ol.
- 37
-
96 P.H.F.

0.771

0.923
PM Peak
-

03.45 -
02:15
`/01.
78 50
P.H.F.

0.750

0.781
Percentag

26.4%
73 6%

52.3%

47.7%,
e

ADT,'AADT
ADT 1.386
A-DT 1,386
0 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

2026 CITYWIDE ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY UPDATE — Phase If E for SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS 17;'

EDCITY OF YUCAIPA, CA DAR
Appendix G
Speed Gun Calibration Certification
A,,IA 1 L-Al? I -E VOCZ- 'P�= �/' I t w I t'l
,oFPLce- vF C%-r,,(
OMINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Yucaipa City CouncilJuly 27, 2026

Yucaipa City Council
July 27, 2026