Projects utilizing SB 1 funds in FY 2022-23 may include the following:
Annual Slurry Seal Program – Area 5 (Construction)
Aliso Creek Road (Aliso Viejo Parkway to City Limit) Rehabilitation (Construction) Aliso Creek Road (Enterprise to SR-73) Rehabilitation (Design) Enterprise (Aliso Creek to Aliso Viejo Parkway) Rehabilitation (Design) Staff respectfully recommends approval of the attached resolution.
Environmental:
Each proposed project will include required environmental actions prior to commencing construction.
Attachment:
1. Resolution
167
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO
VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 in order to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the City of Aliso Viejo are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City of Aliso Viejo must adopt by resolution a list of all projects proposed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Aliso Viejo, will receive an estimated $1,004,050 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2022-23 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the sixth year in which the City of Aliso Viejo is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and WHEREAS, the City of Aliso Viejo used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects; and
WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City of Aliso Viejo maintain and rehabilitate arterial, collector and/or local streets throughout the City this year as well as into the future; and
WHEREAS, the 2018 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City of Aliso Viejo’s streets are in a Good condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will maintain our streets and roads in a Good condition; and WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete 168
streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Aliso Viejo as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
2. The fiscal year 2022-23 list of projects planned to be funded with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues include:
1. Aliso Creek Road Rehabilitation – Enterprise to SR-73 (Pre- Construction)
Description: Prepare construction documents for street patching, asphalt overlay, utility structure adjustments, sidewalk improvements, pavement markings
Estimated Pre-Construction Schedule: Start 07/22 – Completion 06/23 Estimated Construction Schedule: Start 07/23 – Completion 12/23 Estimated Useful Life: 10-20 years
2. Enterprise Rehabilitation – Aliso Creek Road to Aliso Viejo Parkway (Pre-Construction)
Description: Prepare construction documents for street patching, asphalt overlay, utility structure adjustments, sidewalk improvements, pavement markings
Estimated Pre-Construction Schedule: Start 07/22 – Completion 06/23 Estimated Construction Schedule: Start 07/23 – Completion 12/23 Estimated Useful Life: 10-20 years
3. Aliso Creek Road Rehabilitation – Aliso Viejo Parkway to City Limit (Construction)
Description: Street patching, asphalt milling, asphalt overlay, utility structure adjustments, sidewalk improvements, pavement markings Estimated Construction Schedule: Start 06/22 – Completion 12/22 Estimated Useful Life: 10-20 years
4. FY 2022-23 Slurry Seal Program
Description: Asphalt milling, slurry seal, utility structure adjustments, pavement markings
Estimated Construction Schedule: Start 07/22 – Completion 12/22 Estimated Useful Life: 5-7 years
169
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of June, 2022. __________________________
Ross Chun
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________ __________________________
Scott C. Smith, City Attorney Mitzi Ortiz, MMC, City Clerk 170
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO )
I, MITZI ORTIZ, City Clerk of the City of Aliso Viejo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2022-__ duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo at their regular meeting held on the 15th day of June, 2022, by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
___________________________
MITZI ORTIZ, MMC
CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
171
City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: June 15, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Shaun Pelletier, Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: RENEWED MEASURE M ELIGIBILITY
______________________________________________________________________ Recommended Actions:
1. Adopt a 7-year Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for Street Projects; and
2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo concerning the status of the Pavement Management Plan.
Fiscal Impact:
The City will receive approximately $6.1 million in FY 2022-23 through FY 2028-29 in Measure M2 Fair Share funds.
Background:
To maintain eligibility to receive Measure M2 sales tax revenue, the City is required to submit annual documentation on its transportation related programs to Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Measure M2 Fair Share funds are made available to the City annually. Since incorporation, the City has received approximately $8.8 million, or an average of $516,700 annually in source revenues for road maintenance and improving major arterial streets and roads. Cities will be apportioned Measure M2 funds by applying a formula using population; miles of MPAH designated roadways, and taxable sales. The City has also applied for and received (or been awarded) about $2.3 million in competitive funds.
Every year, OCTA requires a submittal of the City’s programs and projects affecting circulation and transportation to verify that these elements are in alignment with Measure M2 and countywide plans. This year’s submittal requires the following documentation:
Measure M2 7-year Capital Improvement Program (7-year CIP) The City’s 7-year CIP is a transportation planning and fiscal forecasting document used to guide future programming for transportation CIP projects. The 7-year CIP is consistent with the proposed citywide CIP Budget for FY 2022-23. The submittal of the 7-year CIP 172
does not commit the City to fund the identified improvements but projects must be included in the 7-year CIP to be eligible to receive Measure M2 funding. This document is updated every year to allow for changes based on maintenance needs or City Council priorities. The CIP emphasizes projects that improve circulation, mitigate traffic congestion, and maintain the City’s investment in existing transportation infrastructure.
Pavement Management Plan Update (PMP)
Each jurisdiction is required to update and certify its Pavement Management Program (PMP) every two years. The PMP is a system to monitor the condition of and perform periodic maintenance and rehabilitation of City streets and roadways. City Staff has recently updated its PMP. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) average for all City streets is 83, in the Good Condition range.
Discussion:
The proposed 7-year CIP for streets is attached. The 7-year CIP includes the City approved 5-year plan which emphasizes rehabilitation work such as slurry sealing and overlays to maintain the condition of the City’s street network. The proposed projects have been assigned to each year based upon priority rankings. Since the exact amount of the funds are not known, it is possible that some projects may not be completed in a given year, but it is important to list them to ensure Measure M funds can be utilized where appropriate. If projects are delayed due to funding, it is staff’s intention to still complete them in the priority ranking order.
In addition to the PMP, the City will complete a long range pavement assessment in FY 2022-23 that will provide additional details on the lifespan of City streets.
With the adoption of the 7-year CIP and Pavement Management Plan Resolution, the City’s Measure M2 eligibility package is complete.
Environmental:
Not applicable.
Attachments:
1. 7-year CIP
2. Resolution
3. Pavement Management Plan
173
6/2/22, 5:10 AM https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing 1/5 Orange County Transportation Authority
FY 2022/23 - FY 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program
TIP ID CP-11272 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Aliso Creek Road Rehab - Enterprise to 73 Type of Work: Road Maintenance Project Description
Type of Work Description: Road Maintenance -Rehabilitation of roadway Rehabilitation of roadway including full depth replacement of failed areas, pavement grinding, andasphalt overlay. 1,400 lf Limits
Aliso Creek Road Rehab - Enterprise to 73
Project Notes
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROWCON/IMP O&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2023 Measure M2 Local Fairshare $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 2023 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $30,000 2024 Measure M2 Local Fairshare $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,609 2024 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $590,000 $0 $590,000 $625,931 Totals: $40,000 $0 $600,000 $0 $640,000 $676,540
Last Revised: 22-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $640,000 TIP ID CP-10012 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Aliso Creek Road Rehabilitation - Wolverine to Alicia Parkway Type of Work: Road Maintenance Project Description
Type of Work Description: Road Maintenance -Rehabilitation of roadway Rehabilitation of roadway including full depth replacement of failed areas, pavement grinding, andasphalt overlay.
Limits
Aliso Creek Road from Aliso Viejo Parkway southto City Limits (4,500 lf) Project Notes
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENGROWCON/IMP O&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2023 Measure M2 Local Fairshare $0 $0 $850,000 $0 $850,000 $875,500 2023 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $850,000 $0 $850,000 $875,500 Totals: $0 $0 $1,700,000 $0 $1,700,000 $1,751,000
Last Revised: 22-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $1,700,000 TIP ID CP-10002 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: 19-OCTA-TSP-3941 Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Aliso Creek Road Traffic Signal Synchronization (Project P) Type of Work: Traffic Signals Project Description
Type of Work Description: Traffic Signals -Coordinate signals within project limits Aliso Viejo's portion of signal timing and equipment upgrades to Aliso Creek Road.
Limits
Aliso Creek Road from El Toro Road to MoultonParkway
Project Notes
FY21-22 Other=TCRF funds
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENGROWCON/IMP O&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2023 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $0 $0 $160,000 $0 $160,000 $164,800 2023 Other $0 $0 $80,000 $0 $80,000 $82,400
Totals: $0 $0 $240,000 $0 $240,000 $247,200
Last Revised: 22-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $240,000 174
6/2/22, 5:10 AM https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing 2/5 TIP ID CP-10003 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Annual Slurry Seal Program
Type of Work: Road Maintenance Project Description
Type of Work Description: Road Maintenance -Slurry seal of roadway Annual program for slurry seal of roadways on residential streets. One fifth of the streets are sealedeach year in accordance with the Pavement Management System.
Limits
Citywide
Project Notes
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROWCON/IMP O&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2023 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $15,450 2023 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $10,000 $0 $1,550,000 $0 $1,560,000 $1,606,500 2024 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $10,000 $0 $740,000 $0 $750,000 $795,066 2024 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $15,914 2025 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $16,391 2025 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $10,000 $0 $740,000 $0 $750,000 $818,618 2026 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $10,000 $0 $740,000 $0 $750,000 $842,877 2026 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $16,883 2027 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $10,000 $0 $740,000 $0 $750,000 $867,863 2027 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $17,389 2028 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $10,000 $0 $740,000 $0 $750,000 $893,599 2028 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $17,911 2029 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $10,000 $0 $740,000 $0 $750,000 $920,107 2029 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 $18,448 Totals: $70,000 $0 $6,095,000 $0 $6,165,000 $6,863,016
Last Revised: 22-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $6,165,000 TIP ID CP-11903 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Citywide Bike Lane Study
Type of Work: Bikeways Project Description
Type of Work Description: Bikeways - Planning Plan and design bicycle facilities throughout the City Limits
Citywide
Project Notes
Other-SCAG grant being applied
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROWCON/IMP O&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2023 Other $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000
2023 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 Totals: $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000
Last Revised: 22-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $250,000 175
6/2/22, 5:10 AM https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing 3/5 TIP ID CP-10004 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: 14-ALSO-ECP-3728 Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Dairy Fork Wetland
Type of Work: Environmental Cleanup Project Description Type of Work Description: EnvironmentalCleanup - Constructed wetlands Maintenance of wetland to improve water quality of Dairy Fork sub-watershed.
Limits
Dairy Fork Tributary Outfall
Project Notes
FISCAL YEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL TOTAL ESCALATED 2023 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
2024 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
2025 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
2026 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
2027 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
2028 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
2029 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
Totals: $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000
Last Revised: 22-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $140,000 TIP ID CP-10006 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Enterprise Rehab - Aliso Creek Road to Aliso Viejo Parkway Type of Work: Road Maintenance Project Description
Type of Work Description: Road Maintenance -Rehabilitation of roadway Rehabilitation of roadway including full depth replacement of failed areas, pavement grinding, andasphalt overlay.
Limits
Aliso Creek Road to Aliso Viejo Parkway (1,450 lf)
Project Notes
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROWCON/IMP O&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2023 Measure M2 Local Fairshare $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 2023 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 2024 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $650,000 $0 $650,000 $689,585 2024 Measure M2 Local Fairshare $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,609 Totals: $60,000 $0 $660,000 $0 $720,000 $760,194
Last Revised: 22-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $720,000 TIP ID CP-10007 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Glenwood Rehab - SR73 to Aliso Creek Road Type of Work: Road Maintenance Project Description
Type of Work Description: Road Maintenance -Reconstruction of roadway Rehabilitation of roadway including full depth replacement of failed areas, pavement grinding, andasphalt overlay (2,700 lf) Limits
Glenwood from 73 Freeway to Aliso Creek Road
Project Notes
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROWCON/IMP O&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2024 Measure M2 Local Fairshare $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 2024 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 2025 Local Streets and Roadsapportionments $0 $0 $765,000 $0 $765,000 $835,936 2025 Measure M2 Local Fairshare $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,927 Totals: $85,000 $0 $775,000 $0 $860,000 $931,863
Last Revised: 22-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $860,000 176
6/2/22, 5:10 AM https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing 4/5 TIP ID CP-10008 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: 18-OCTA-TSP-3905 Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Los Alisos Route Traffic Signal Synchronization (Project P) Type of Work: Traffic Signals Project Description
Type of Work Description: Traffic Signals -Coordinate signals within project limits Aliso Viejo's portion of signal timing & equipment upgrades to Aliso Viejo Parkway. O&M performed in-house.
Limits
Columbia to Melinda
Project Notes
Other=TCRF Funds
FISCALYEAR FUND TYPE ENGROWCON/IMP O&MTOTAL TOTALESCALATED 2023 Measure M2 LocalFairshare $0 $0 $14,000 $0 $14,000 $14,420 Totals: $0 $0 $14,000 $0 $14,000 $14,420
Last Revised: 22-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $14,000 TIP ID CP-10013 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: 13-ALSO-ECP-3682 Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Stormwater Litter Control Project - Phase 3 Type of Work: Environmental Cleanup Project Description Type of Work Description: EnvironmentalCleanup - Catchment Retrofit Storm Water Pollution Project - This project will include installation of Bio Clean High Capacity FilterInserts on storm drain catch basins located on Public Streets within the City of Aliso Viejo. This is formaintenance of catch basin filters.
Limits
Various catch basins throughout the City
Project Notes
FISCAL YEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL TOTAL ESCALATED 2023 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,200 $10,200 $10,200
Totals: $0 $0 $0 $10,200 $10,200 $10,200
Last Revised: 22-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $10,200 TIP ID CP-10014 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: 16-ALSO-ECP-3844 Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Stormwater Litter Control Project - Phase 4 Type of Work: Environmental Cleanup Project Description Type of Work Description: EnvironmentalCleanup - Catchment Retrofit Storm Water Pollution Project - This project will include installation of Bio Clean High Capacity FilterInserts on storm drain catch basins located on Public Streets within the City of Aliso Viejo. This is formaintenance of catch basin filters.
Limits
Various catch basins throughout the City
Project Notes
FISCAL YEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL TOTAL ESCALATED 2023 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $11,100 $11,100 $11,100
2024 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $11,100 $11,100 $11,100
2025 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $11,100 $11,100 $11,100
Totals: $0 $0 $0 $33,300 $33,300 $33,300
Last Revised: 22-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $33,300 177
6/2/22, 5:10 AM https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing https://ocfundtracker.octa.net/CIP/report_project_listing 5/5 TIP ID CP-10015 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: 17-ALSO-ECP-3878 Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Stormwater Litter Control Project - Phase 5 Type of Work: Environmental Cleanup Project Description Type of Work Description: EnvironmentalCleanup - Catchment Retrofit Storm Water Pollution Proj-This project will include installation of Bio Clean high Capacity Filter insertson storm drain catch basins located on Public Streets. ECP funding approved in 2017. This is formaintenance of catch basin filters.
Limits
Various catch basins throughout the City
Project Notes
FISCAL YEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL TOTAL ESCALATED 2023 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000
2023 Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $23,000 $23,000 $23,000
2024 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000
2024 Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $23,000 $23,000 $23,000
2025 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000
2025 Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $23,000 $23,000 $23,000
2026 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000
2026 Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $23,000 $23,000 $23,000
Totals: $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000
Last Revised: 22-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $120,000 TIP ID CP-10016 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY Aliso Viejo, City of Local Project Number: Project Title
Additional Project IDs: Wood Canyon Wetland
Type of Work: Environmental Cleanup Project Description Type of Work Description: EnvironmentalCleanup - Constructed wetlands Maintenance of wetland to improve water quality in the Wood Canyon Wetland Limits
Wood Canyon Wetland
Project Notes
FISCAL YEAR FUND TYPE ENG ROW CON/IMP O&M TOTAL TOTAL ESCALATED 2023 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2024 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2025 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2026 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2027 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2028 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
2029 General Fund $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
Totals: $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000
Last Revised: 22-00 - In Progress Total Programmed: $70,000 178
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO
VIEJO, CALIFORNIA CONCERNING THE STATUS AND UPDATE OF
THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE MEASURE M2 (M2)
PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the local jurisdiction is required to meet eligibility requirements and submit eligibility verification packages to Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in order to remain eligible to receive M2 funds.
WHEREAS, the local jurisdiction is required to adopt and update a Pavement Management Plan (PMP), using the required format, regarding the status of road pavement conditions and implementation of the PMP on a biennial basis; and WHEREAS, the local jurisdiction is required to provide a plan that manages the preservation, rehabilitation, and maintenance of paved roads by analyzing pavement life cycles, assessing overall system performance costs, and determining alternative strategies and costs necessary to improve paved roads.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council for the City of Aliso Viejo does hereby inform OCTA that:
a) The PMP is in conformance with the PMP Submittal Template provided in the Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines.
b) The City hereby adopts a PMP and has provided an updated PMP report, using the required format, to OCTA.
c) The Public Works Director, City Engineer or designee is authorized to sign the PMP certification form.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of June, 2022. __________________________
Ross Chun
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________ __________________________
Scott C. Smith, City Attorney Mitzi Ortiz, MMC, City Clerk 179
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO )
I, MITZI ORTIZ, City Clerk of the City of Aliso Viejo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2022-__ duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo at their regular meeting held on the 15th day of June, 2022, by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
___________________________
MITZI ORTIZ, MMC
CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
180
City of Aliso Viejo
Pavement
Management Plan
Prepared by: NCE
Submitted to OCTA 06-30-2022
181
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 1
Agency Submittal Table of Contents
I. Pavement Management Plan Certification ..................................................................................................... 2 II. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 3 III. Background ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 IV. Current Pavement Conditions (PCI) ................................................................................................................ 4 V. Projected Pavement Conditions (PCI) ............................................................................................................. 4 VI. Alternative Funding Levels .............................................................................................................................. 5 Maintain Existing Average Network PCI .............................................................................................................. 5 Improve Average Network PCI ............................................................................................................................ 5 VII. Current and Projected Backlog by Year of Pavement Maintenance Needs .................................................... 6 VIII. Centerline Mileage .......................................................................................................................................... 6 IX. Percentage of Network in Each of Five Condition Categories Based on Centerline Miles ............................. 7 X. Reduction in M2 Local Match ......................................................................................................................... 8 XI. Appendix A – Seven-Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Current or Expected Funding Level .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 XII. Appendix B – Complete Street Listing Current Conditions ........................................................................... 10 XIII. Appendix C – GIS Digital Data ....................................................................................................................... 11 XIV. Appendix D – Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan ................................................................................. 12 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 XV. Appendix E – Pavement Management Data Files ......................................................................................... 13
182
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 2
I. Pavement Management Plan Certification
The City of Aliso Viejo certifies that it has a Pavement Management Plan in conformance with the criteria stated in the Orange County Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 3. This ordinance requires that a Pavement Management Plan be in place and maintained to qualify for allocat ion of revenues generated from renewed Measure M (M2).
The plan was developed by City of Aliso Viejo* using PAVER™, a pavement management system, conforming to American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard D6433, and contains, at a minimum , the following elements:
• Inventory of MPAH and local routes reviewed and updated biennially. The last update of the inventory was completed on October, 2021 for Arterial (MPAH) streets and November, 2021 for local streets. • Assessment of pavement condition for all routes in the system, updated biennially. The last field review of pavement condition was completed on November, 2021.
• Percentage (by pavement area) of all sections of pavement needing:
o Preventative Maintenance: 76.3%
o Rehabilitation: 23.7%
o Reconstruction: 0%
• Budget needs for Preventative Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and/or Reconstruction of deficient sections of pavement for:
o Current biennial period $10.57 million
o Following biennial period $1.58 million
• Funds budgeted or available for Preventative Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and/or Reconstruction:
o Current biennial period $3.80 million
o Following biennial period $2.84 million
• Backlog by year of unfunded pavement rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction needs. • The Pavement Management Plan is consistent with countywide pavement condition assessment standards as described in the OCTA Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines adopted by the OCTA Board of Directors.
*An electronic copy of the Pavement Management Plan (with Micro Paver or StreetSaver compatible files) has been, or will be, submitted with the certification statement.
A copy of this certification is being provided to the Orange County Transportation Authority.
Submitted by:
Shaun Pelletier City of Aliso Viejo
Name (Print) Jurisdiction
Signed Date
Director of Public Works
Title
183
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 3
II. Executive Summary
The City of Aliso Viejo (City) selected NCE to perform an update of the City’s Pavement Management Plan (PMP).
The goal of this project is to update the PMP with current pavement conditions and to perform funding analyses to help inform and educate policy makers as well as to comply with the Orange County Transportation Authority’s (OCTA) Measure M2 Program.
The 202 2 PMP update includes an assessment of the entire street network via semi -automated inspection method. The assessment was completed between October 2021 and April 2022. The City has a street system that is in an overall “Good” condition with a network average (weighted by area) PCI of 83. Approximately 76.3 percent (by area) of the network is in “Very Good” or “Good” condition category, 17.6 percent is in “Fair”, 6% in “Poor” condition, and none (0%) are in “Very Poor” condition.
Based on the pavement condition, the City has met OCTA’s requirements for receiving a 10 percent reduction in M2 local matching funds by maintaining the PCI above 75. The City’s eligibility would continue for the next seven years under the current funding plans. Besides, the impact of CIP projects over the next seven years will maintain the PCI above 75. The City will continue to be eligible for 10 a percent reduction in M2 local matching funds for the next seven years.
III. Background
The City owns and maintains approximately 70.3 centerline miles of pavements, which includes 26.3 miles of the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) streets, 44 miles of local streets representing a total replacement cost of $213 million.
184
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 4
IV. Current Pavement Conditions (PCI)
Current Network PCI Current MPAH PCI Current Local PCI
83 79 86
V. Projected Pavement Conditions (PCI)
Should be by projected PCI by year under existing or expected funding levels for next seven fiscal years (“Today” is before June 30, 2022).
Fiscal Year Current Funding Entire Network
PCI MPAH Local
Today $2,310,000 83 79 86
2022-23 $2,310,000 83 79 86
2023-24 $1,500,000 82 78 86
2024-25 $1,500,000 82 78 85
2025-26 $1,500,000 81 77 84
2026-27 $1,500,000 81 76 84
2027-28 $1,500,000 80 75 83
2028-29 $1,500,000 79 75 83
185
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 5
VI. Alternative Funding Levels
Maintain Existing Average Network PCI
Fiscal Year Maintain
Funding
Entire Network
PCI MPAH Local
Today $2,310,000 83 79 86
2022-23 $5,000,000 86 85 86
2023-24 $5,000,000 89 87 89
2024-25 $1,900,000 88 88 88
2025-26 $750,000 87 86 87
2026-27 $1,000,000 86 86 86
2027-28 $2,600,000 85 85 85
2028-29 $210,000 83 83 85
Improve Average Network PCI
Fiscal Year Improve Funding Entire Network
PCI MPAH Local
Today $2,310,000 83 79 86
2022-23 $7,300,000 85 86 85
2023-24 $1,000,000 84 84 84
2024-25 $700,000 83 83 83
2025-26 $4,000,000 83 83 83
2026-27 $3,100,000 84 84 83
2027-28 $4,300,000 84 85 83
2028-29 $3,000,000 84 84 83
186
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 6
VII. Current and Projected Backlog by Year of Pavement Maintenance Needs Fiscal Year Current Funding
Backlog ($ million)
Maintain PCI Backlog
($ million)
Increase PCI Backlog
($ million)
Today $2.4 $2.4 $2.4
2022-23 $2.4 $2.4 $0.0
2023-24 $2.8 $2.8 $0.0
2024-25 $2.3 $2.3 $0.0
2025-26 $2.6 $2.6 $0.0
2026-27 $4.5 $4.5 $0.0
2027-28 $5.8 $5.8 $0.8
2028-29 $6.5 $6.5 $0.0
VIII. Centerline Mileage
Entire Pavement Network MPAH Local Streets
70.3 26.3 44.0
187
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 7
IX. Percentage of Network in Each of Five Condition Categories Based on Centerline Miles
Condition
Category
PCI
Range Network
Percent
Area of
Total
Pavement
Area of
Pavement
(sf)
Percent
Centerline
Mileage of
Network
Centerline
Mileage of
Network
Very
Good 86-100
MPAH 8.63% 1,331,088
41.6%
5.8 Local 32.94% 5,079,186 25.4
Good 75-85
MPAH 15.82% 2,438,596
34.8%
10.2 Local 18.96% 2,922,457 13.5
Fair 60-74
MPAH 13.77% 2,122,877
17.6%
8.9 Local 3.86% 595,357 2.6
Poor 41-59
MPAH 2.42% 373,112
6.0%
1.4 Local 3.60% 555,076 2.6
Very
Poor 0-40
MPAH 0.00% 0
0.0%
0.0 Local 0.00% 0 0.0
188
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 8
X. Reduction in M2 Local Match
A local agency match reduction of 10% of the eligible cost for projects submitted for consideration of funding through the M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs (CTFP) call for projects is available if the local agency either:
a. Shows measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system improvement o f one Pavement Condition Index (PCI) point with no reduction in the overall weighted (by area) average PCI in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) or local street categories;
or
b. Have road pavement conditions during the previous reporting period, wi thin the highest 20% of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher, otherwise defined as in “good condition”.
The City of Aliso Viejo has met both the criteria noted above by having an average weighted PCI of 83. This means the City continues to remain eligible for M2 funding. 189
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 9
XI. Appendix A – Seven-Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Current or Expected Funding Level
The seven-year plan for road maintenance and rehabilitation should be based on current and projected budget.
Street sections selected for treatment should be identified here. Specific data to be submitted should follow the format below:
MPAH
Limits of Work
Street Name From To Length of
Segment
Width of
Segment
Pavement
Area
Type of
Treatment
Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
LOCAL
Limits of Work
Street Name From To Length of
Segment
Width of
Segment
Pavement
Area
Type of
Treatment
Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Please attach the seven-year road maintenance and rehabilitation plan, following the above template, after this sheet. The plan should be labeled Appendix A.
190
Appendix A
Seven‐Year Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on City's Current Funding Street Name From To Length
(ft)
Width
(ft) Area (sf) Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Liberty 1,767 48 83,266 CIP - Mill and Overlay $287,261.72 FY 2022/23 Aliso Creek Rd Liberty Pursuit 942 48 43,666 CIP - Mill and Overlay $150,644.56 FY 2022/23 Aliso Creek Rd Pursuit Wood Canyon Dr 985 48 47,280 CIP - Mill and Overlay $163,112.60 FY 2022/23 Aliso Creek Rd Wood Canyon Dr City Limits (Bridge) 740 48 35,520 CIP - Mill and Overlay $122,541.45 FY 2022/23 Aliso Creek Rd City Limits (Bridge) Wood Canyon Dr 750 48 35,830 CIP - Mill and Overlay $123,610.92 FY 2022/23 Aliso Creek Rd Wood Canyon Dr Pursuit 979 48 45,342 CIP - Mill and Overlay $156,426.64 FY 2022/23 Aliso Creek Rd Pursuit Liberty 935 48 43,430 CIP - Mill and Overlay $149,830.38 FY 2022/23 Aliso Creek Rd Liberty Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,767 48 83,066 CIP - Mill and Overlay $286,571.73 FY 2022/23 Aliso Creek Rd 73 Toll Overpass Enterprise 1,405 51 71,655 CIP - Mill and Overlay $60,000.00 FY 2022/23 Aliso Viejo Parkway Moulton Pkwy Briarglen 603 49 29,547 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $18,25 9.92 FY 2023/24 Aliso Viejo Parkway Endeavor Grand 1,187 49 58,163 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $35,944.48 FY 20 23/24 Pacific Park Dr Chase Cheyenne 1,727 41 69,207 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $42,769.62 FY 2023/2 4 Pacific Park Dr Bridge w/s Aliso Creek Rd 1,436 96 68,928 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $42,597. 20 FY 2023/24 Glenwood Dr SR 73 Bridge Brookline 997 42 41,874 CIP - Slurry Seal $16,620.55 FY 2023/24 Glenwood Dr Aliso Creek Rd Brookline 1,595 42 65,440 CIP - Slurry Seal $25,974.32 FY 2023/24 Glenwood Dr Brookline SR 73 Bridge 997 42 41,774 CIP - Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $16,580.85 FY 2023/24 Glenwood Dr Brookline Aliso Creek Rd 1,586 42 65,062 CIP - Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $25,824.28 FY 2023/24 Aliso Creek Rd 73 Toll Overpass Enterprise 1,405 51 71,655 CIP - Mill and Overlay $600,000.00 FY 2023/24 Aliso Viejo Parkway Cedarbrook Briarglen 1,540 49 73,910 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $47,046.3 3 FY 2024/25 Aliso Viejo Parkway Briarglen Moulton Pkwy 603 49 31,397 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $19,98 5.30 FY 2024/25 Aliso Viejo Parkway Briarglen Cedarbrook 1,540 49 75,360 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $47,969.3 1 FY 2024/25 Pacific Park Dr Canyon Vistas Coronado Cay 805 40 30,600 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $19,47 7.98 FY 2024/25 Pacific Park Dr Coronado Cay Enterprise 1,251 41 50,041 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $31,852.87 FY 2024/25 Pacific Park Dr 73 Toll Overpass Enterprise 475 41 19,475 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $12,3 96.53 FY 2024/25 Glenwood Dr SR 73 Bridge Brookline 997 42 41,874 CIP - Mill and Overlay $151,540.28 FY 2024/25 Glenwood Dr Aliso Creek Rd Brookline 1,595 42 65,440 CIP - Mill and Overlay $236,824.66 FY 2024/25 Glenwood Dr Brookline SR 73 Bridge 997 42 41,774 CIP - Mill and Overlay $151,178.38 FY 2024/25 Glenwood Dr Brookline Aliso Creek Rd 1,586 42 65,062 CIP - Mill and Overlay $235,456.69 FY 2024/25 Aliso Creek Rd Enterprise Autumnglen 1,016 48 47,218 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $30,055.93 FY 2024/25 Aliso Creek Rd Pacific Park Dr Journey 1,397 48 67,056 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $42,683.52 F Y 2024/25 Aliso Creek Rd Journey Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,102 48 52,896 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $33,670.18 FY 2024/25 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Journey 1,104 48 51,342 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $32,681.00 FY 2024/25 Aliso Creek Rd Journey Pacific Park Dr 1,423 48 68,304 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $43,477.92 F Y 2024/25 Aliso Creek Rd Pacific Park Dr Autumnglen 1,065 48 49,570 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $31,553. 06 FY 2024/25 Aliso Creek Rd Autumnglen Enterprise 1,016 48 47,318 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $30,119.58 FY 2024/25 Aliso Creek Rd Windsong Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,051 40 40,790 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $25,964.2 8 FY 2024/25 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Windsong 1,044 41 41,254 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $26,259.6 3 FY 2024/25 Wood Canyon Dr Las Flores Valencia 1,664 50 83,200 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $52,959.75 FY 20 24/25 Wood Canyon Dr SOKA South Entrance Calypso St 1,102 61 67,222 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $42, 789.19 FY 2024/25 Pacific Park Dr Wood Canyon Dr Cheyenne 1,236 42 50,662 Mill and Overlay $265,743.34 FY 2025/26 Pacific Park Dr Enterprise Coronado Cay 1,248 41 51,098 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $33,501.46 FY 2025/26 Aliso Creek Rd El Toro Rd Hummingbird Ln 661 41 25,851 Mill and Overlay $135,599.29 FY 2025/26 Aliso Creek Rd Glenwood Dr Eastwing 1,143 41 45,413 Mill and Overlay $238,210.15 FY 2025/26 Alicia Parkway Pacific Park Morning Ridge 1,153 41 47,273 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $31,923. 48 FY 2026/27 Alicia Parkway Morning Ridge 73 Overpass 514 41 21,074 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $14,231. 28 FY 2026/27 Alicia Parkway 73 Overpass Holly Oak 520 41 21,320 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $14,397.41 FY 2026/27 Alicia Parkway Holly Oak North City Limits 1,396 41 57,236 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $38,651 .50 FY 2026/27 Alicia Parkway North City Limits Holly Oak 1,393 42 58,506 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $39,509 .13 FY 2026/27 Alicia Parkway Holly Oak 73 Overpass 523 42 21,966 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $14,833.65 FY 2026/27 Alicia Parkway 73 Overpass Morning Ridge 513 42 21,546 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $14,550. 02 FY 2026/27 Alicia Parkway Morning Ridge Pacific Park Dr 1,154 42 48,468 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $32,7 30.46 FY 2026/27 Aliso Viejo Parkway Enterprise Columbia 1,671 45 76,995 Mill and Overlay $415,987.05 FY 2026/27 Aliso Creek Rd Windsong 73 Toll Overpass 1,338 51 66,688 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $45,034.4 4 FY 2026/27 MPAH
Submitted by: NCE Page 1 of 8 5/31/2022
191
Appendix A
Seven‐Year Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on City's Current Funding Street Name From To Length
(ft)
Width
(ft) Area (sf) Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
MPAH
Aliso Viejo Parkway Pacific Park Dr 1134 n/o Pacific Park Dr 1,134 51 56,036 Mill and Overlay $311,832.69 FY 2027/28 Aliso Viejo Parkway Aliso Creek Rd Cedarbrook 674 49 31,776 Mill and Overlay $176,829.10 FY 2027/28 Pacific Park Dr Heather Ridge Alicia Pkwy 992 75 41,664 Mill and Overlay $231,854.47 FY 2027/28 Pacific Park Dr City Limits Aliso Niguel 1,656 42 69,552 Mill and Overlay $398,658.80 FY 2028/29 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Niguel La Paz 632 42 26,544 Mill and Overlay $152,145.15 FY 2028/29 Pacific Park Dr Chase Cheyenne 1,727 41 69,207 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $49,581.71 FY 2028/2 9 Pacific Park Dr Alicia Pkwy Bridge e/s 1,167 48 56,016 Mill and Overlay $321,073.03 FY 2028/29 Pacific Park Dr Bridge w/s Aliso Creek Rd 1,436 96 68,928 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $49,381. 83 FY 2028/29 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Viejo Pkwy Wood Canyon Dr 1,358 42 55,256 Mill and Overlay $316,716.86 FY 2028/29 Submitted by: NCE Page 2 of 8 5/31/2022
192
Appendix A
Seven‐Year Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on City's Current Funding Street Name From To Length
(ft)
Width
(ft) Area (sf) Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Shining Star Wy Gatewood Dr End 102 36 4,922 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,420.61 FY 2022/23 Style Dr Gatewood Dr Dead End 410 36 17,510 CIP - Slurry Seal $8,611.33 FY 2022/23 Style Dr Style Dr End 63 56 3,528 CIP - Slurry Seal $1,735.05 FY 2022/23 Enterprise Aliso Viejo Pkwy Summit 1,000 39 37,450 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,631.09 FY 2022/23 Enterprise Summit Aliso Creek Rd 2,035 39 77,915 CIP - Loca lized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $20,037.55 FY 2022/23 Enterprise Aliso Creek Rd Summit 2,024 39 78,936 CIP - Loca lized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $20,300.12 FY 2022/23 Enterprise Summit Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,004 39 39,006 CIP - Slurry Seal $10,031.25 FY 2022/23 Westridge Dr Oakview Dr Wood Canyon Dr 874 40 34,480 CIP - Slurry Seal $16,957.09 FY 2022/23 Gatewood Dr Oakview Dr Dead End 1,105 40 45,450 CIP - Slurry Seal $22,352.08 FY 2022/23 Southern Hills Dr Bel Flora Ct Dead End 976 40 40,290 CIP - Slurry Seal $19,814.42 FY 2022/23 Bel Flora Ct Oakview Dr Country Walk Dr 542 40 21,680 CIP - Slurry Seal $10,662.11 FY 2022/23 Oakview Dr Wood Canyon Dr Crimso n Canyon 943 40 37,600 CIP - Slurry Seal $18,491.49 FY 2022/23 Oakview Dr Crimson Canyon Endless Vista 1,486 40 59,440 CIP - Slurry Seal $29,232.29 FY 2022/23 Oakview Dr Endless Vista Gate 2, 018 40 80,370 CIP - Slurry Seal $39,525.56 FY 2022/23 Midnight Ct Dawn Ln Dead End 158 36 6,938 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,412.07 FY 2022/23 Evening Light Ln Dusk Wy Dawn Ln 866 36 31,176 CIP - Slurry Seal $15,332.20 FY 2022/23 Dusk Wy Dawn Ln Evening Light 264 36 9,504 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,674.02 FY 2022/23 Dawn Ln Oakview Dr Dusk Wy 1,255 36 45,180 CIP - Slurry Seal $22,219.29 FY 2022/23 Orion Liberty End 447 45 20,115 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,892.45 FY 2022/23 Liberty Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1033' s/o Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,033 64 66,112 CIP - Slurry Seal $32,513.54 FY 2022/23 Liberty 1033' s/o Aliso Viejo Pkwy Pursuit 2,179 64 139,456 CIP - Slurry Seal $68,583.75 FY 2022/23 Liberty Pursuit Aliso Creek Rd 955 64 61,120 CIP - Slurry Seal $30,058.50 FY 2022/23 Duray Ct Monstad St End 264 40 11,810 CIP - Slurry Seal $5,808.10 FY 2022/23 Kewen Wy Grindlay Pl Monstad St 538 32 17,216 CIP - Slurry Seal $8,466.74 FY 2022/23 Grindlay Pl Monstad St Kewen Wy 190 40 8,850 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,352.38 FY 2022/23 Monstad St Pursuit Grindlay Pl 984 40 40,610 CIP - Slurry Seal $19,971.79 FY 2022/23 Monstad St Monstad St End 68 70 6,010 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,955.69 FY 2022/23 Mesa Cr Lyon Ridge End 260 36 9,360 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,603.20 FY 2022/23 Lyon Ridge Lyon Ridge Dead End 796 36 28,656 CIP - Slurry Seal $14,092.87 FY 2022/23 Lyon Ridge Pursuit Lyon Ridge 157 36 5,652 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,779.62 FY 2022/23 Lyon Ridge Lyon Ridge Dead End 88 36 3,168 CIP - Slurry Seal $1,558.01 FY 2022/23 Pursuit Liberty Rue Du Chateau 890 45 40,050 CIP - Slurry Seal $19,696.39 FY 2022/23 Pursuit Rue Du Chateau Lyon Ridge 1,538 45 69,210 CIP - Slurry Seal $34,037.12 FY 2022/23 Pursuit Lyon Ridge Aliso Creek Rd 1,580 45 71,100 CIP - Slurry Seal $34,966.62 FY 2022/23 City Lights Dr Pacific Park Prvt Prop 1,390 64 88,960 CIP - Slurry Seal $43,750.07 FY 2022/23 Journey Aliso Creek Pacific Park Dr 1,829 45 82,155 CIP - Slurry Seal $40,403.41 FY 2022/23 Journey Journey (N) Journey (S) 3,207 45 144,165 CIP - Slurry Seal $70,899.61 FY 2022/23 Heather Ridge Pacific Park Dr Woodside 471 40 18,725 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,208.86 FY 2022/23 Creekside Woodside Morningridge 792 40 31,680 CIP - Slurry Seal $15,580.06 FY 2022/23 Woodside Morning Ridge Creekside 807 40 32,130 CIP - Slurry Seal $15,801.37 FY 2022/23 Morning Ridge Alicia Pkwy Creek side 561 40 22,440 CIP - Slurry Seal $11,035.88 FY 2022/23 Morning Ridge Creekside Woodside 1, 126 40 45,040 CIP - Slurry Seal $22,150.44 FY 2022/23 Enterprise Aliso Viejo Pkwy Summit 1,000 39 37,450 CIP - Mill and Overlay $106,744.55 FY 2023/24 Enterprise Summit Aliso Creek Rd 2,035 39 77,915 CIP - Mill and Overlay $222,082.81 FY 2023/24 Enterprise Aliso Creek Rd Summit 2,024 39 78,936 CIP - Mill and Overlay $224,992.99 FY 2023/24 Enterprise Summit Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,004 39 39,006 CIP - Mill and Overlay $111,179.65 FY 2023/24 Via Iglesia Calle Cortez Moulton Pkwy 1,950 40 78,000 CIP - Slurry Seal $23,199.60 FY 2025/26 Via Iglesia Calle Cortez Moulton Pkwy 1,400 40 57,000 CIP - Slurry Seal $16,953.56 FY 2025/26 Prairie Falcon Egret Ln Crane St 1,223 40 48,920 CIP - Slurry Seal $14,550.31 FY 2025/26 Local Streets
Submitted by: NCE Page 3 of 8 5/31/2022
193
Appendix A
Seven‐Year Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on City's Current Funding Street Name From To Length
(ft)
Width
(ft) Area (sf) Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Local Streets
Prairie Falcon Crane St Dead End 829 40 34,320 CIP - Slurry Seal $10,207.82 FY 2025/26 Crane St Canyon Wren Ln Prarie Falcon 101 40 4,010 CIP - Slurry Seal $1,192.70 FY 2025/26 Bluebird Ln Cardinal Ave Dead End 921 34 32,564 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,685.54 FY 2025/26 Cardinal Ave Canyon Wren Ln Bluebird ln 918 34 31,122 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,256.64 FY 2025/26 Nutcracker Ln Cuervo Dr Dead End 421 39 17,579 CIP - Slurry Seal $5,228.54 FY 2025/26 Calle Corta Westwing El Toro Rd 1,364 40 54,470 CIP - Slurry Seal $16,201.06 FY 2025/26 Canyon Wren Ln Westwing Crane St 1,833 40 73,320 CIP - Slurry Seal $21,807.63 FY 2025/26 Canyon Wren Ln Crane St El Toro Rd 1,208 40 48,230 CIP - Slurry Seal $14,345.09 FY 2025/26 Bob White Ln Pinyon Jay Cuervo Dr 264 39 10,276 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,056.40 FY 2025/26 King Eider Ln Calle Corta Dead End 970 36 36,170 CIP - Slurry Seal $10,758.07 FY 2025/26 Chickadee Ln Calle Corta Dead End 1,056 36 39,176 CIP - Slurry Seal $11,652.15 FY 2025/26 Pheasant Ln Westwing Dead End 950 36 35,450 CIP - Slurry Seal $10,543.92 FY 2025/26 Rosy Finch Ln Westwing Dead End 964 36 35,894 CIP - Slurry Seal $10,675.98 FY 2025/26 Sora Ct Westwing Dead End 73 36 3,478 CIP - Slurry Seal $1,034.46 FY 2025/26 Westwing Aliso Creek Ramblewood 2, 548 40 101,770 CIP - Slurry Seal $30,269.53 FY 2025/26 Westwing Calle Corta Aliso Creek 1, 784 40 71,360 CIP - Slurry Seal $21,224.66 FY 2025/26 Dove Ln Macaw St Dead End 424 36 16,454 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,893.93 FY 2025/26 Macaw St Larkspur Dr Dove 264 36 9,504 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,826.78 FY 2025/26 Mallard Dr Moorhen Dead End 432 36 16,802 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,997.43 FY 2025/26 Peacock Ct Moorhen Ln Dead end 264 36 10,754 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,198.57 FY 2025/26 Pinyon Jay Wigeon Ln Bob White 206 39 8,034 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,389.56 FY 2025/26 Moorhen Ln Westwing Mallard Dr 392 36 14,112 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,197.34 FY 2025/26 Blue Jay Dr Woodstork Ln Dead End West 470 36 18,170 CIP - Slurry Seal $5,404.32 FY 2025/26 Blue Jay Dr Woodstork Ln Dead End East 398 36 15,548 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,624.45 FY 2025/26 Woodstork Ln Skylark Dr Bluejay Dr 264 36 9,464 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,814.89 FY 2025/26 Raven Ln Skylark Dr Dead End 1, 490 36 54,800 CIP - Slurry Seal $16,299.21 FY 2025/26 Eastwing Skylark Dr Aliso Creek Rd 528 40 21,570 CIP - Slurry Seal $6,415.58 FY 2025/26 Skylark Dr Larkspur Dr Eastwing 1, 166 40 46,520 CIP - Slurry Seal $13,836.48 FY 2025/26 Larkspur Dr Spoonbill Dr Skylark Dr 913 40 36,430 CIP - Slurry Seal $10,835.40 FY 2025/26 Spoonbill Dr Surfbird Ln Lakespur Dr 528 40 21,120 CIP - Slurry Seal $6,281.74 FY 2025/26 Wigeon Ln Cuervo Dr Pinyon Jay 264 39 10,296 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,062.35 FY 2025/26 Osprey Ave Surfbird Ln Dead End 264 37 11,018 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,277.09 FY 2025/26 Golden Eagle Ct Surfbird Ln Dead End 264 37 11,018 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,277.09 FY 2025/26 Surfbird Ln Spoonbill Dr Seagull Ln 1,211 37 45,657 CIP - Slurry Seal $13,579.80 FY 2025/26 Surfbird Ln Seagull Ln Dead End 670 37 26,040 CIP - Slurry Seal $7,745.10 FY 2025/26 Merlin Ave Surfbird Ln Moorhen Ln 1,672 34 56,788 CIP - Slurry Seal $16,890.50 FY 2025/26 Swan Ln Surfbird Ln Dead End 370 36 14,510 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,315.72 FY 2025/26 Dunlin Ln Surfbird Ln Dead End 528 38 21,314 CIP - Slurry Seal $6,339.44 FY 2025/26 Brookline Brookline Glenwood 380 64 24,320 CIP - Slurry Seal $7,233.52 FY 2025/26 Brookline Aliso Creek Rd Dead End 1,551 44 69,404 CIP - Slurry Seal $20,642.89 FY 2025/26 Columbia Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,622 44 71,208 CIP - Mill and Overlay $245,667.60 FY 2025/26 Columbia Columbia Columbia 1,796 36 64,656 CIP - Mill and Overlay $223,063.20 FY 2025/26 Columbia Columbia End 423 40 17,580 CIP - Mill and Overlay $60,651.00 FY 2025/26 Argonaut Aliso Creek Rd Argonaut 1,483 44 65,252 CIP - Mill and Overlay $225,119.40 FY 2025/26 Argonaut Argonaut Argonaut 1,633 44 71,852 CIP - Mill and Overlay $247,889.40 FY 2025/26 Argonaut Argonaut Glenwood Dr 398 44 17,432 CIP - Mill and Overlay $60,140.40 FY 2025/26 Solitaire Ln Seagull Ln Dead End 1,040 36 38,690 CIP - Slurry Seal $11,507.60 FY 2025/26 Lynoak Briarglen Dead End 264 36 10,754 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,198.57 FY 2025/26 Spicewood Eastwind Dead End 815 36 30,590 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,098.41 FY 2025/26 Submitted by: NCE Page 4 of 8 5/31/2022
194
Appendix A
Seven‐Year Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on City's Current Funding Street Name From To Length
(ft)
Width
(ft) Area (sf) Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Local Streets
Windflower Eastwind Dead End 792 36 29,762 CIP - Slurry Seal $8,852.14 FY 2025/26 Parkwood Eastwind Dead End 792 36 29,762 CIP - Slurry Seal $8,852.14 FY 2025/26 Blackbird Ln Seagull Ln Dead End 886 36 33,146 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,858.64 FY 2025/26 Coralwind Eastwind Dead End 615 36 23,390 CIP - Slurry Seal $6,956.91 FY 2025/26 Briarglen Eastwind Dahlia 1,077 32 34,304 CIP - Slurry Seal $10,203.07 FY 2025/26 Briarglen Dahlia Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,001 32 32,032 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,527.30 FY 2025/26 Briarglen Briarglen Dead End 106 60 7,460 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,218.83 FY 2025/26 Eastwind Amber Briarglen 1,571 30 47,130 CIP - Slurry Seal $14,017.91 FY 2025/26 Amber Eastwood Dead End 351 36 13,886 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,130.12 FY 2025/26 Birchmont Cedarbrook Eastwind 804 40 32,160 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,565.37 FY 2025/26 Cuervo Dr Canyon Wren Ln Wigeon Ln 1,066 36 38,376 CIP - Slurry Seal $11,414.20 FY 2025/26 Seagull Ln Surfbird Ln Canyon Wren Ln 933 40 37,320 CIP - Slurry Seal $11,100.12 FY 2025/26 Cedarbrook Rainwood Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,510 37 55,790 CIP - Slurry Seal $16,593.66 FY 2025/26 Cedarbrook Glenwood Dr Rainwood 1,790 37 66,070 CIP - Slurry Seal $19,651.25 FY 2025/26 Cedarbrook Da Vinci Glenwood Dr 1,071 43 46,703 CIP - Slurry Seal $13,890.91 FY 2025/26 Da Vinci Glenwood Dr Cedarbrook 1,943 43 83,549 CIP - Slurry Seal $24,850.05 FY 2025/26 Calle Cortez Via Iglesia Moulton Pkwy 443 36 14,903 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,432.61 FY 2025/26 Egret Ln Prarie Falcon Seagull Ln 2,039 40 81,500 CIP - Slurry Seal $24,240.61 FY 2025/26 Satinbush Collingwood Dead End 141 36 6,326 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,522.95 FY 2026/27 Collingwood Briarcliff Diamondgate 730 36 26,280 CIP - Slurry Seal $10,481.04 FY 2026/27 Thornbird Briarcliff Dead End 536 36 20,546 CIP - Slurry Seal $8,194.20 FY 2026/27 Helmcrest Briarcliff Dead End 634 36 24,074 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,601.24 FY 2026/27 Grandbriar Briarcliff Dead End 792 36 29,762 CIP - Slurry Seal $11,869.74 FY 2026/27 Briarcliff Lindengrove Westwing 1, 144 36 41,034 CIP - Slurry Seal $16,365.26 FY 2026/27 Lindengrove Diamondgate Briarcliff 1,165 36 41,860 CIP - Slurry Seal $16,694.69 FY 2026/27 Goldenfield Diamondgate Dead End 114 36 5,304 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,115.35 FY 2026/27 Mareblu Pacific Park Dead End 565 38 21,470 CIP - Slurry Seal $8,562.71 FY 2026/27 Crystal Glen Diamondgate Dead End 332 36 13,202 CIP - Slurry Seal $5,265.25 FY 2026/27 Diamond Gate Lindengrove Dead End 1,481 36 54,706 CIP - Slurry Seal $21,817.96 FY 2026/27 Crestview Meadow Point Dead End 733 36 27,638 CIP - Slurry Seal $11,022.64 FY 2026/27 Meadow Point Skygate Diamondgate 486 40 19,440 CIP - Slurry Seal $7,753.10 FY 2026/27 Skygate Westwing Meadow Point 1,056 40 42,240 CIP - Slurry Seal $16,846.24 FY 2026/27 Phoebe Ct Royal Tern Dead End 306 30 10,430 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,159.71 FY 2026/27 Condor Ln Sanderling Ln Hummingbird Ln 126 36 4,536 CIP - Slurry Seal $1,809.06 FY 2026/27 Sanderling Ln Falcon Crest Ln Hummingbird Ln 569 36 20,484 CIP - Slurry Seal $8,169.47 FY 2026/27 Falcon Crest Ln Royal Tern Ln Sanderling Ln 566 36 20,376 CIP - Slurry Seal $8,126.40 FY 2026/27 Royal Tern Ln Dead End Phoebe 953 36 35,558 CIP - Slurry Seal $14,181.31 FY 2026/27 Willet Ln Hummingbird Ln Royal Turn Ln 232 36 8,352 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,330.96 FY 2026/27 White Pelican Ln Blue Heron Ln Dead End 268 36 10,898 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,346.36 FY 2026/27 Blue Heron Ln San Bittern Ln Dead End 567 36 21,612 CIP - Slurry Seal $8,619.34 FY 2026/27 Goldfinch Ln Hummingbird Ln Woodswallow Ln 148 40 5,920 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,361.03 FY 2026/27 Firecrest Ln Songbird Ln Woodswallow Ln 156 36 5,616 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,239.78 FY 2026/27 Trumpeter Ln Woodswallow Ln Songbird Ln 264 36 9,504 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,790.40 FY 2026/27 Songbird Ln Trumpeter Ln Firecrest Ln 1,320 36 47,520 CIP - Slurry Seal $18,952.02 FY 2026/27 Coral Bill Ln Hummingbird Ln Woodswallow 158 40 6,320 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,520.56 FY 2026/27 San Bittern Ln Hummingbird Ln Dead End 827 36 30,962 CIP - Slurry Seal $12,348.33 FY 2026/27 Starling Ln Hummingbird Ln Dead End 686 36 25,951 CIP - Slurry Seal $10,349.83 FY 2026/27 Hummingbird Ln Aliso Creek San Bittern Ln 1,590 40 63,600 CIP - Slurry Seal $25,365.08 FY 2026/27 Hummingbird Ln San Bittern Ln Dead End 1,052 40 42,080 CIP - Slurry Seal $16,782.43 FY 2026/27 Submitted by: NCE Page 5 of 8 5/31/2022
195
Appendix A
Seven‐Year Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on City's Current Funding Street Name From To Length
(ft)
Width
(ft) Area (sf) Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Local Streets
Flintstone Eastwing Dead End 1,320 30 40,850 CIP - Slurry Seal $16,291.88 FY 2026/27 Timberbluff Ramblewood Dead End 267 36 10,862 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,332.01 FY 2026/27 Ramblewood Shorecliff Westwing 574 34 19,456 CIP - Slurry Seal $7,759.48 FY 2026/27 Mayflower Shore Cliff Dead End 421 36 16,406 CIP - Slurry Seal $6,543.07 FY 2026/27 Shorecliff Ridgecrest Dead End 1,848 30 56,690 CIP - Slurry Seal $22,609.22 FY 2026/27 Brooktree Oakleigh Dead End 424 30 15,210 CIP - Slurry Seal $6,066.08 FY 2026/27 Ridgecrest Oakleigh Shorecliff 1, 584 30 47,520 CIP - Slurry Seal $18,952.02 FY 2026/27 Oakleigh Eastwing Brooktree 414 30 12,420 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,953.37 FY 2026/27 Heatherwood Eastwing Dead End 931 36 34,706 CIP - Slurry Seal $13,841.52 FY 2026/27 Eaglepoint End End 507 36 18,252 CIP - Slurry Seal $7,279.30 FY 2026/27 Pathfinder Saddleridge Eaglepoint 264 36 9,504 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,790.40 FY 2026/27 Crossbow Sandbridge Saddleridge 293 36 10,548 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,206.77 FY 2026/27 Sandbridge Highpoint Heatherwood 1,169 40 46,760 CIP - Slurry Seal $18,648.92 FY 2026/27 Highpoint Stonebrook Dead End 957 40 39,530 CIP - Slurry Seal $15,765.44 FY 2026/27 Stonebrook Westwing Dead End 528 36 20,258 CIP - Slurry Seal $8,079.34 FY 2026/27 Hazelbranch Baylaurel Dead En d 196 36 8,306 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,312.62 FY 2026/27 Copper Crest End End 921 36 35,656 CIP - Slurry Seal $14,220.40 FY 2026/27 Bay Laurel Westwing Coppercrest 514 40 20,560 CIP - Slurry Seal $8,199.78 FY 2026/27 Tanglewood Westwing Dead End 1, 050 36 38,990 CIP - Slurry Seal $15,550.07 FY 2026/27 Northwinds Westwing Dead End 698 35 25,680 CIP - Slurry Seal $10,241.75 FY 2026/27 Eastwing Heatherwood Aliso Creek 1, 229 40 49,160 CIP - Slurry Seal $19,606.09 FY 2026/27 Eastwing Heatherwood Ramblewood 1, 941 40 77,640 CIP - Slurry Seal $30,964.54 FY 2026/27 Park Ave Cedarbrook Dead End 622 40 26,160 CIP - Slurry Seal $10,433.18 FY 2026/27 Windsong Aliso Creek (West) Dead End 514 44 22,546 CIP - Slurry Seal $8,991.84 FY 2026/27 Windsong Aliso Creek (East) Cedarbrook 1,400 40 56,000 CIP - Slurry Seal $22,334.03 FY 2026/27 Hollyoak Alicia Pk wy Laurelmont 1,225 40 49,000 CIP - Slurry Seal $19,542.28 FY 2026/27 Laurelmont Alicia Park way Hollyoak 1,338 40 53,435 CIP - Slurry Seal $21,311.06 FY 2026/27 Cedarbrook Aliso Viejo Pkwy Starcrest 1,295 40 51,800 CIP - Slurry Seal $20,658.98 FY 2026/27 Cedarbrook Starcrest Windsong 900 40 35,920 CIP - Slurry Seal $14,325.69 FY 2026/27 Cedarbrook Windsong Park Ave 1, 618 40 64,560 CIP - Slurry Seal $25,747.95 FY 2026/27 Saddleridge Highpoint Dead End 1, 097 36 40,742 CIP - Slurry Seal $16,248.81 FY 2026/27 Erica Ln Grand Richemont Wy 146 36 5,176 CIP - Slurry Seal $1,655.92 FY 2027/28 Peppertree Pacific Park Dr Sprucewood 1,162 40 46,360 CIP - Slurry Seal $14,831.64 FY 2027/28 Peppertree Sprucewood End 1,046 40 42,690 CIP - Slurry Seal $13,657.53 FY 2027/28 Elderwood Sagebrush Dead End 1,584 36 58,274 CIP - Slurry Seal $18,643.21 FY 2027/28 Clusterberry Timberland Elderwood 158 36 5,608 CIP - Slurry Seal $1,794.13 FY 2027/28 Sagebrush Timberland Canyon Vistas 312 40 12,400 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,967.05 FY 2027/28 Bearberry Timberland Dead End 158 36 6,938 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,219.63 FY 2027/28 Timberland Peppertree Dead End 2,213 36 84,228 CIP - Slurry Seal $26,946.50 FY 2027/28 Sprucewood Canyon Vistas Peppertree 2,423 36 87,108 CIP - Slurry Seal $27,867.88 FY 2027/28 Rock Rose Canyon Vistas Peppertee 2,073 36 74,628 CIP - Slurry Seal $23,875.24 FY 2027/28 Coastal Oak Canyon Vistas Peppertree 1,848 36 66,408 CIP - Slurry Seal $21,245.47 FY 2027/28 Wood Vista Wy Hopseed Canyon Vista 1,136 40 45,440 CIP - Slurry Seal $14,537.31 FY 2027/28 Stone Pine Hopseed Dead End 792 36 29,762 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,521.56 FY 2027/28 Lantana Hopseed Dead End 792 36 29,762 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,521.56 FY 2027/28 Golden Rain Hopseed Dead End 770 36 28,910 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,248.98 FY 2027/28 Deerwood Hopseed Dead End 950 36 35,390 CIP - Slurry Seal $11,322.09 FY 2027/28 Hopseed Hollyleaf Wood Vista 2,048 40 81,920 CIP - Slurry Seal $26,208.12 FY 2027/28 Lilac Hollyleaf Dead End 150 36 6,615 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,116.29 FY 2027/28 Submitted by: NCE Page 6 of 8 5/31/2022
196
Appendix A
Seven‐Year Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on City's Current Funding Street Name From To Length
(ft)
Width
(ft) Area (sf) Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Local Streets
Sugar Gum Hollyleaf Dead End 335 36 13,310 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,258.18 FY 2027/28 Coffeeberry Hollyleaf Dead End 422 36 16,442 CIP - Slurry Seal $5,260.18 FY 2027/28 Hollyleaf Hopseed Bottlebrush 984 36 35,424 CIP - Slurry Seal $11,332.96 FY 2027/28 Hollyleaf Bottlebrush Dead End 1,111 36 40,786 CIP - Slurry Seal $13,048.39 FY 2027/28 Sugarbush Bottlebrush Dead End 630 28 18,890 CIP - Slurry Seal $6,043.35 FY 2027/28 Bottlebrush Silkwood Hollyleaf 480 36 17,280 CIP - Slurry Seal $5,528.27 FY 2027/28 Scrub Oak Silkwood Dead End 453 36 17,558 CIP - Slurry Seal $5,617.21 FY 2027/28 Silkwood Canyon Vistas Dead End 1,206 36 44,666 CIP - Slurry Seal $14,289.69 FY 2027/28 Canyon Vistas Pacific Pa rk Wood Vista Way 953 40 37,970 CIP - Slurry Seal $12,147.49 FY 2027/28 Canyon Vistas Wood Vista Way S ilkwood 1,569 40 62,760 CIP - Slurry Seal $20,078.39 FY 2027/28 Enterprise Pacific Park Dr Antares 418 44 18,392 CIP - Slurry Seal $5,884.03 FY 2027/28 Enterprise Antares Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,672 44 76,318 CIP - Slurry Seal $24,415.91 FY 2027/28 Enterprise Aliso Viejo Pkwy Summit 1,000 39 37,450 CIP - Slurry Seal $11,981.13 FY 2027/28 Enterprise Summit Aliso Creek Rd 2, 035 39 77,915 CIP - Slurry Seal $24,926.82 FY 2027/28 Enterprise Aliso Creek Rd Summit 2, 024 39 78,936 CIP - Slurry Seal $25,253.46 FY 2027/28 Enterprise Summit Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1,004 39 39,006 CIP - Slurry Seal $12,478.93 FY 2027/28 Enterprise Aliso Viejo Pkwy Antares 1,672 35 61,970 CIP - Slurry Seal $19,825.65 FY 2027/28 Enterprise Antares Pacific Park Dr 418 35 16,180 CIP - Slurry Seal $5,176.36 FY 2027/28 Palm Harbor Cayman Brac Cape Coral 292 36 10,512 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,363.03 FY 2027/28 Cape Coral Laguna Madre Brittany Bay 712 36 25,632 CIP - Slurry Seal $8,200.27 FY 2027/28 Laguna Madre Cayman Brac Cape Coral 284 36 10,224 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,270.90 FY 2027/28 Paradise Bay Chase Cayman Brac 144 36 5,184 CIP - Slurry Seal $1,658.48 FY 2027/28 Cayman Brac Brittany Bay Laguna Madre 643 36 23,148 CIP - Slurry Seal $7,405.58 FY 2027/28 Cayman Brac Brittany Bay Key Largo 559 36 20,124 CIP - Slurry Seal $6,438.14 FY 2027/28 Brittany Bay Cayman Brac Key Largo 310 36 11,160 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,570.34 FY 2027/28 Key Largo Sanborn Cayman Brae 595 36 21,420 CIP - Slurry Seal $6,852.76 FY 2027/28 Boulder Cir Northern Pine Dead End 149 36 6,614 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,115.97 FY 2027/28 Oak Ridge Cir Northern Pine Dead End 183 36 7,838 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,507.56 FY 2027/28 Sierra Cir Northern Pine Dead End 185 31 6,985 CIP - Slurry Seal $2,234.66 FY 2027/28 Northern Pine Loop Ponderosa Ponderosa 2,112 36 76,032 CIP - Slurry Seal $24,324.41 FY 2027/28 Ponderosa St Sanborn Northern Pine 131 40 5,160 CIP - Slurry Seal $1,650.80 FY 2027/28 Picket Ln Wood Cany on Plateau 143 36 5,098 CIP - Slurry Seal $1,630.97 FY 2027/28 Plateau Wood Canyon Plateau 141 36 5,076 CIP - Slurry Seal $1,623.93 FY 2027/28 Plateau North End Picket Ln 1,342 36 49,562 CIP - Slurry Seal $15,856.04 FY 2027/28 Plateau Picket Ln South End 439 36 17,154 CIP - Slurry Seal $5,487.96 FY 2027/28 Kara Ct Richmont Wy Dead End 264 36 10,754 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,440.46 FY 2027/28 Gala Ct Richmont Wy Dead End 264 36 10,754 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,440.46 FY 2027/28 Richmont Wy Caledon Ct Kara Ct 534 36 19,224 CIP - Slurry Seal $6,150.21 FY 2027/28 Caledon Ct Richmont Wy Dead End 321 36 12,806 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,096.94 FY 2027/28 Nantais Pierremont Dead End 264 36 10,754 CIP - Slurry Seal $3,440.46 FY 2027/28 Pierremont Parisville Dead end 910 36 33,950 CIP - Slurry Seal $10,861.40 FY 2027/28 Parisville Grand Dead End 398 36 15,578 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,983.77 FY 2027/28 Grand Ave Aliso Viejo Pkwy Wood Canyon Dr 909 45 39,405 CIP - Slurry Seal $12,606.58 FY 2027/28 Grand Ave Aliso Viejo Pkwy Vantis Dr (pvt) 264 65 15,310 CIP - Slurry Seal $4,898.03 FY 2027/28 Sanborn Chase Aurora 1,189 36 42,804 CIP - Slurry Seal $13,694.00 FY 2027/28 Sanborn Aurora Wood Canyon Dr 999 36 35,824 CIP - Slurry Seal $11,460.93 FY 2027/28 Chase Thisledown Paradise Bay 1, 132 43 48,676 CIP - Slurry Seal $15,572.59 FY 2027/28 Chase Paradise Bay Sanborn 658 43 28,294 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,051.91 FY 2027/28 Chase Sanborn Pacific Park Dr 587 43 25,241 CIP - Slurry Seal $8,075.18 FY 2027/28 Submitted by: NCE Page 7 of 8 5/31/2022
197
Appendix A
Seven‐Year Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on City's Current Funding Street Name From To Length
(ft)
Width
(ft) Area (sf) Treatment Type Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Local Streets
Wood Canyon Dr Pacifi c Park Dr Sanborn 1,346 43 57,878 CIP - Slurry Seal $18,516.52 FY 2027/28 Wood Canyon Dr Sanborn Grand 703 43 30,179 CIP - Slurry Seal $9,654.96 FY 2027/28 Wood Canyon Dr Grand Alastair 1, 354 43 58,222 CIP - Slurry Seal $18,626.57 FY 2027/28 Wood Canyon Dr Alastair Thistledown 542 43 23,306 CIP - Slurry Seal $7,456.13 FY 2027/28 Oakgrove Dr Wood Canyon Dr Plea sant Walk 1,340 40 53,480 CIP - Slurry Seal $17,109.50 FY 2027/28 Shining Star Wy Gatewood Dr End 102 36 4,922 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $3,526.25 FY 2028/29 Style Dr Gatewood Dr Dead End 410 36 17,510 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatmen t (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $12,544.62 FY 2028/29 Southern Hills Dr Bel Flora Ct Dead End 976 40 40,290 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $28,864.81 FY 2028/29 Oakview Dr Wood Canyon Dr Crimson Canyon 943 40 37,600 Slurry Seal with Loca lized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $26,937.6 3 FY 2028/29 Kewen Wy Grindlay Pl Monstad St 538 32 17,216 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $12,333.99 FY 2028/ 29 Grindlay Pl Monstad St Kewen Wy 190 40 8,850 Slurry Seal wi th Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $6,340.37 FY 2028/29 Mesa Cr Lyon Ridge End 260 36 9,360 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatment (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $6,705.75 FY 2028/29 Lyon Ridge Pursuit Lyon Ridge 157 36 5,652 Slurry Seal with Localized Treatmen t (e.g. Digout, Crack Seal) $4,049.24 FY 2028/29 Submitted by: NCE Page 8 of 8 5/31/2022
198
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 10
XII. Appendix B – Complete Street Listing Current Conditions A complete street listing of current pavement conditions should be included in this report. Specific data to be submitted should follow the format below:
MPAH
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date
LOCAL
Street Name From To Width of Segment Area Current PCI Most Recent Inspection Date
Please attach the complete street listing, following the above template, after this sheet. The pages should be labeled Appendix B.
199
Appendix B
MPAH Street Listing ‐ Current Condition
Street Name From To Width of
Segment (ft) Area (sf) PCI
Most Recent
Inspection
Date
Alicia Parkway Pacific Park Morning Ridge 41 47,273 97 10/27/2021 Alicia Parkway Morning Ridge 73 Overpass 41 21,074 97 10/27/2021 Alicia Parkway 73 Overpass Holly Oak 41 21,320 97 10/27/2021 Alicia Parkway Holly Oak North City Limits 41 57,236 97 10/27/2021 Alicia Parkway North City Limits Holly Oak 42 58,506 97 10/27/2021 Alicia Parkway Holly Oak 73 Overpass 42 21,966 98 10/27/2021 Alicia Parkway 73 Overpass Morning Ridge 42 21,546 98 10/27/2021 Alicia Parkway Morning Ridge Pacific Park Dr 42 48,468 97 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Enterprise Autumnglen 48 47,218 83 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Autumnglen Pacific Park Dr 48 49,670 80 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Pacific Park Dr Journey 48 67,056 87 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Journey Aliso Viejo Pkwy 48 52,896 87 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Liberty 48 83,266 62 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Liberty Pursuit 48 43,666 67 10/27/2021
Aliso Creek Rd Pursuit Wood Canyon Dr 48 47,280 74 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Wood Canyon Dr City Limits (Bridge) 48 35,520 66 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd City Limits (Bridge) Wood Canyon Dr 48 35,830 65 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Wood Canyon Dr Pursuit 48 45,342 65 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Pursuit Liberty 48 43,430 62 10/27/2021
Aliso Creek Rd Liberty Aliso Viejo Pkwy 48 83,066 64 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Journey 48 51,342 88 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Journey Pacific Park Dr 48 68,304 89 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Pacific Park Dr Autumnglen 48 49,570 85 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Autumnglen Enterprise 48 47,318 85 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Enterprise 73 Toll Overpass 51 70,205 60 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd 73 Toll Overpass Windsong 51 68,646 82 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Windsong Aliso Viejo Pkwy 40 40,790 90 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Columbia 40 78,250 74 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Columbia Glenwood Dr 40 69,150 69 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Glenwood Dr Eastwing 41 45,413 61 10/27/2021 MPAH
Submitted by: NCE Page 1 of 14 5/20/2022
200
Appendix B
MPAH Street Listing ‐ Current Condition
Street Name From To Width of
Segment (ft) Area (sf) PCI
Most Recent
Inspection
Date
MPAH
Aliso Creek Rd Eastwing Westwing 41 87,297 75 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Westwing Hummingbird Ln 41 90,350 76 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Hummingbird Ln El Toro Rd 41 26,846 75 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy Windsong 41 41,254 94 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Windsong 73 Toll Overpass 51 66,688 95 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd 73 Toll Overpass Enterprise 51 71,655 56 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Glenwood Dr Columbia 41 71,694 78 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Columbia Aliso Viejo Pkwy 41 79,389 74 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd El Toro Rd Hummingbird Ln 41 25,851 69 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Hummingbird Ln Westwing 41 91,714 77 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Westwing Eastwing 41 88,970 77 10/27/2021 Aliso Creek Rd Eastwing Glenwood Dr 41 46,371 74 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Cedarbrook Briarglen 49 73,910 91 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Briarglen Moulton Pkwy 49 31,397 91 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Moulton Pkwy Briarglen 49 29,547 85 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Briarglen Cedarbrook 49 75,360 90 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Cedarbrook Aliso Creek Rd 49 31,727 73 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Aliso Creek Rd Columbia 49 76,848 60 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Columbia Enterprise 45 76,360 55 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Enterprise Vantis Dr 48 56,674 70 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Vantis Dr Grand 48 48,240 80 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Grand Endeavor 48 55,426 81 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Endeavor Pacific Park Dr 48 54,432 79 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Pacific Park Dr 1134 n/o Pacific Park Dr 51 56,036 81 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Endeavor Grand 49 58,163 83 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Grand Vantis Dr 48 46,546 79 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Vantis Dr Enterprise 48 56,334 75 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Enterprise Columbia 45 76,995 66 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Columbia Aliso Creek Rd 45 70,615 69 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Aliso Creek Rd Cedarbrook 49 31,776 67 10/27/2021 Submitted by: NCE Page 2 of 14 5/20/2022
201
Appendix B
MPAH Street Listing ‐ Current Condition
Street Name From To Width of
Segment (ft) Area (sf) PCI
Most Recent
Inspection
Date
MPAH
Aliso Viejo Parkway Aliso Creek Rd Liberty 44 52,592 78 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Liberty Pacific Park Dr 44 79,816 78 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Pacific Park Dr Liberty 40 71,336 81 10/27/2021 Aliso Viejo Parkway Liberty Aliso Creek Rd 40 49,440 87 10/27/2021 Glenwood Dr SR 73 Bridge Brookline 42 41,874 63 10/27/2021 Glenwood Dr Argonaut Aliso Creek Rd 42 44,954 75 10/27/2021 Glenwood Dr Aliso Creek Rd Brookline 42 65,440 63 10/27/2021 Glenwood Dr Brookline SR 73 Bridge 42 41,774 61 10/27/2021 Glenwood Dr Brookline Aliso Creek Rd 42 65,062 54 10/27/2021 Glenwood Dr Aliso Creek Rd Argonaut 42 43,164 77 10/27/2021 Glenwood Dr Argonaut Cedarbrook 42 40,110 74 10/27/2021 Glenwood Dr Cedarbrook Da Vinci 42 45,962 80 10/27/2021 Glenwood Dr Da Vinci City Limits 42 37,044 80 10/27/2021 Glenwood Dr City Limits Da Vinci 42 36,750 81 10/27/2021 Glenwood Dr Da Vinci Cedarbrook 42 47,922 71 10/27/2021 Glenwood Dr Cedarbrook Argonaut 42 38,560 76 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr City Limits Aliso Niguel 42 69,552 75 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Niguel La Paz 42 26,544 76 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Wood Canyon Dr Aliso Viejo Pkwy 48 64,068 78 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Viejo Pkwy City Lights Dr 48 60,524 97 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr City Lights Dr Aliso Creek Rd 48 44,668 98 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Creek Rd Bridge w/s 48 68,928 81 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Bridge e/s Alicia Pkwy 48 56,256 78 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr La Paz Rd Aliso Niguel 42 26,796 47 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Niguel City Limits 42 67,742 70 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr La Paz Rd Heather Ridge 75 91,575 58 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Heather Ridge Alicia Pkwy 75 41,664 59 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Alicia Pkwy Bridge e/s 48 56,016 78 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Bridge w/s Aliso Creek Rd 96 68,928 79 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Creek Rd City Lights Dr 42 38,096 89 10/27/2021 Submitted by: NCE Page 3 of 14 5/20/2022
202
Appendix B
MPAH Street Listing ‐ Current Condition
Street Name From To Width of
Segment (ft) Area (sf) PCI
Most Recent
Inspection
Date
MPAH
Pacific Park Dr City Lights Dr Aliso Viejo Pkwy 42 52,796 97 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Aliso Viejo Pkwy Wood Canyon Dr 42 55,256 72 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Wood Canyon Dr Cheyenne 42 50,662 69 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Cheyenne Chase 42 72,156 74 10/27/2021
Pacific Park Dr Chase Canyon Vistas 42 53,940 81 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Canyon Vistas Coronado Cay 40 30,600 87 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Coronado Cay Enterprise 41 50,041 88 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Enterprise 73 Toll Overpass 41 20,407 82 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr 73 Toll Overpass Enterprise 41 19,475 86 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Enterprise Coronado Cay 41 51,098 91 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Coronado Cay Canyon Vistas 41 33,087 94 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Canyon Vistas Chase 42 54,352 94 10/27/2021 Pacific Park Dr Chase Cheyenne 41 69,207 81 10/27/2021
Pacific Park Dr Cheyenne Wood Canyon Dr 41 50,881 80 10/27/2021 Wood Canyon Dr Aliso Creek Las Flores 50 53,850 77 10/27/2021 Wood Canyon Dr Westridge Dr Pacific Park Dr 70 69,360 72 10/27/2021 Wood Canyon Dr Las Flores Valencia 50 83,200 83 10/27/2021 Wood Canyon Dr Valencia Tivoli 50 49,600 76 10/27/2021
Wood Canyon Dr Tivoli Cottage Ln 50 48,900 71 10/27/2021 Wood Canyon Dr Cottage Ln SOKA South Entrance 61 93,897 74 10/27/2021 Wood Canyon Dr SOKA South Entrance Calypso St 61 67,222 83 10/27/2021 Wood Canyon Dr Calypso St Oak View Dr 61 98,612 77 10/27/2021 Wood Canyon Dr Oak View Dr Huntington Ln (Access Rd) 55 76,300 80 10/27/2021 Wood Canyon Dr Huntington Ln (Access Rd) Westridge Dr 55 62,535 72 10/27/2021 Submitted by: NCE Page 4 of 14 5/20/2022
203
Appendix B
MPAH Street Listing ‐ Current Condition
Street Name From To Width of
Segment (ft) Area (sf) PCI
Most Recent
Inspection
Date
Amber Eastwood Dead End 36 13,886 91 11/16/2021
Argonaut Aliso Creek Rd Argonaut 44 65,252 51 11/16/2021 Argonaut Argonaut Argonaut 44 71,852 60 11/16/2021
Argonaut Argonaut Glenwood Dr 44 17,432 56 11/16/2021
Autumnglen Aliso Creek Rd Summerfield 40 52,800 96 11/16/2021 Barrington Cranwell Chesterwood 30 7,920 96 11/16/2021
Bay Laurel Westwing Coppercrest 40 20,560 89 11/17/2021 Bearberry Timberland Dead End 36 6,938 96 11/16/2021
Beech Dr Poplar Dr Pacific Grove Dr 40 31,680 96 11/16/2021 Bel Flora Ct Oakview Dr Country Walk Dr 40 21,680 84 11/16/2021 Birch Dr Rowan Dr Mallorn Dr 36 9,720 98 11/16/2021
Birchmont Cedarbrook Eastwind 40 32,160 93 11/16/2021
Blackbird Ln Seagull Ln Dead End 36 33,146 87 11/17/2021 Blue Heron Ln San Bittern Ln Dead End 36 21,612 81 11/17/2021 Blue Jay Dr Woodstork Ln Dead End West 36 18,170 84 11/17/2021 Blue Jay Dr Woodstork Ln Dead End East 36 15,548 81 11/17/2021 Bluebird Ln Cardinal Ave Dead End 34 32,564 86 11/17/2021 Bob White
Ln Pinyon Jay Cuervo Dr 39 10,276 83 11/17/2021
Bottlebrush Silkwood Hollylea f 36 17,280 92 11/16/2021 Boulder Cir Northern Pine Dead End 36 6,614 77 11/16/2021 Boundary Oak Wood Canyon Dr Weybride Wy 40 34,420 97 11/16/2021 Boundary Oak Weybridge Wy Pleasent Walk 40 47,120 96 11/16/2021 Briarcliff Lindengrove Westwing 36 41,034 93 11/17/2021 Briarglen Eastwind Dahlia 32 34,304 89 11/16/2021
Briarglen Dahlia Aliso Viejo Pkwy 32 32,032 89 11/16/2021 Briarglen Briarglen Dead End 60 7,460 93 11/16/2021
Brittany Bay Cayman Brac Key Largo 36 11,160 90 11/16/2021 Brookline Brookline Glenwood 64 24,320 81 11/16/2021
Brookline Aliso Creek Rd Dead End 44 69,404 84 11/16/2021 Brookstone Pl Somerset Dr Seton Dr 36 6,480 97 11/16/2021 Local Streets
Submitted by: NCE Page 5 of 14 5/20/2022
204
Appendix B
MPAH Street Listing ‐ Current Condition
Street Name From To Width of
Segment (ft) Area (sf) PCI
Most Recent
Inspection
Date
Local Streets
Brooktree Oakleigh Dead End 30 15,210 77 11/17/2021
Caledon Ct Richmont Wy Dead End 36 12,806 96 11/16/2021 Calle Corta Westwing El Toro Rd 40 54,470 83 11/17/2021 Calle Cortez Via Iglesia Moulton Pkwy 36 14,903 91 11/17/2021 Calypso St Wood Canyon Dr Sunbury Dr 36 20,880 96 11/16/2021 Cameo Dr Laurelwood St Charlemont Dr 36 27,022 96 11/16/2021 Canyon Vistas Pacific Park Wood Vista Way 40 37,970 91 11/16/2021 Canyon Vistas Wood Vista Way Silkwood 40 62,760 94 11/16/2021 Canyon Wren Ln Westwing Crane St 40 73,320 84 11/17/2021 Canyon Wren Ln Crane St El Toro Rd 40 48,230 85 11/17/2021 Cape Coral Laguna Madre Brittany Bay 36 25,632 90 11/16/2021 Cardinal Ave Canyon Wren Ln Bluebird ln 34 31,122 83 11/17/2021 Cayman Brac Brittany Bay Laguna Madre 36 23,148 90 11/16/2021 Cayman Brac Brittany Bay Key Largo 36 20,124 94 11/16/2021 Cedarbrook Aliso Viejo Pkwy Starcrest 40 51,800 82 11/16/2021 Cedarbrook Starcrest Windsong 40 35,920 95 11/16/2021
Cedarbrook Windsong Park Ave 40 64,560 95 11/16/2021
Cedarbrook Rainwood Aliso Viejo Pkwy 37 55,790 73 11/16/2021 Cedarbrook Glenwood Dr Rainwood 37 66,070 68 11/16/2021 Cedarbrook Da Vinci Glenwood Dr 43 46,703 81 11/16/2021 Chancey Ct Cameo Dr Dead End 36 6,938 96 11/16/2021
Charlemont Dr Cameo Dr Deerborn Dr 36 11,988 96 11/16/2021 Chase Thisledown Paradise Bay 43 48,676 87 11/16/2021
Chase Paradise Bay Sanborn 43 28,294 87 11/16/2021
Chase Sanborn Pacific Park Dr 43 25,241 89 11/16/2021
Chesterwood Cliffwood Barrington 30 15,760 97 11/16/2021 Chestnut Dr Beech Dr Pacific Grove Dr 36 19,008 98 11/16/2021 Chickadee Ln Calle Corta Dead End 36 39,176 79 11/17/2021 City Lights Dr Pacific Park Prvt Prop 64 88,960 80 11/16/2021 Cliffwood Cranwell Chesterwood 30 18,840 97 11/16/2021
Submitted by: NCE Page 6 of 14 5/20/2022
205
Appendix B
MPAH Street Listing ‐ Current Condition
Street Name From To Width of
Segment (ft) Area (sf) PCI
Most Recent
Inspection
Date
Local Streets
Clusterberry Timberland Elderwood 36 5,608 96 11/16/2021 Coastal Oak Canyon Vistas Peppertree 36 66,408 87 11/16/2021 Coffeeberry Hollyleaf Dead End 36 16,442 93 11/16/2021
Collingwood Briarclif f Diamondgate 36 26,280 93 11/17/2021 Columbia Aliso Creek Rd Aliso Viejo Pkwy 44 71,208 54 11/16/2021 Columbia Columbia Columbia 36 64,656 52 11/16/2021
Columbia Columbia End 40 17,580 60 11/16/2021
Condor Ln Sanderling Ln Hummingbird Ln 36 4,536 90 11/17/2021 Copper Crest End End 36 35,656 91 11/17/2021
Coral Bill Ln Hummingbird Ln Woodswallow 40 6,320 54 11/17/2021 Coralwind Eastwind Dead End 36 23,390 93 11/16/2021
Crane St Canyon Wren Ln Prarie Falcon 40 4,010 88 11/17/2021 Cranwell Barrington Cliffwood 30 15,840 97 11/16/2021
Creekside Woodside Morningridge 40 31,680 55 11/16/2021 Crestview Meadow Point Dead End 36 27,638 91 11/17/2021 Crossbow Sandbridge Saddleridge 36 10,548 88 11/17/2021 Crystal Glen Diamondgate Dead End 36 13,202 89 11/17/2021 Cuervo Dr Canyon Wren Ln Wigeon Ln 36 38,376 85 11/17/2021 Da Vinci Glenwood Dr Cedarbrook 43 83,549 88 11/16/2021 Dawn Ln Oakview Dr Dusk Wy 36 45,180 79 11/16/2021
Deerborn Dr Cameo Dr Calypso St 36 30,744 97 11/16/2021 Deerborn Dr Calypso St Sherwood Dr 36 19,008 97 11/16/2021 Deerhurst Wolverine Foxborough 40 72,320 95 11/17/2021
Deerhurst Foxborough Pacific Park Dr 40 69,880 95 11/17/2021 Deerwood Hopseed Dead End 36 35,390 95 11/16/2021
Diamond Gate Lindengrove Dead End 36 54,706 89 11/17/2021 Dove Ln Macaw St Dead End 36 16,454 79 11/17/2021
Dunlin Ln Surfbird Ln Dead End 38 21,314 85 11/17/2021 Duray Ct Monstad St End 40 11,810 83 11/16/2021
Dusk Wy Dawn Ln Evening Light 36 9,504 74 11/16/2021
Submitted by: NCE Page 7 of 14 5/20/2022
206
Appendix B
MPAH Street Listing ‐ Current Condition
Street Name From To Width of
Segment (ft) Area (sf) PCI
Most Recent
Inspection
Date
Local Streets
Eaglepoint End End 36 18,252 86 11/17/2021
Eastwind Amber Briarglen 30 47,130 91 11/16/2021
Eastwing Skylark Dr Aliso Creek Rd 40 21,570 78 11/17/2021 Eastwing Heatherwood Aliso Creek 40 49,160 91 11/17/2021 Eastwing Heatherwood Ramblewood 40 77,640 88 11/17/2021 Egret Ln Prarie Falcon Seagull Ln 40 81,500 87 11/17/2021 Elderwood Sagebrush Dead End 36 58,274 94 11/16/2021
Enterprise Pacific Park Dr Antares 44 18,392 75 11/16/2021 Enterprise Antares Aliso Viejo Pkwy 44 76,318 79 11/16/2021 Enterprise Aliso Viejo Pkwy Summit 39 37,450 78 11/16/2021 Enterprise Summit Aliso Creek Rd 39 77,915 60 11/16/2021 Enterprise Aliso Creek Rd Summit 39 78,936 54 11/16/2021 Enterprise Summit Aliso Viejo Pkwy 39 39,006 83 11/16/2021 Enterprise Aliso Viejo Pkwy Antares 35 61,970 78 11/16/2021 Enterprise Antares Pacific Park Dr 35 16,180 77 11/16/2021 Erica Ln Grand Richemont Wy 36 5,176 88 11/16/2021
Evening Light Ln Dusk Wy Dawn Ln 36 31,176 80 11/16/2021 Falcon Crest Ln Royal Tern Ln Sanderling Ln 36 20,376 82 11/17/2021 Firecrest Ln Songbird Ln Woodswallow Ln 36 5,616 86 11/17/2021 Flintstone Eastwing Dead End 30 40,850 91 11/17/2021
Foxborough Deerhurst Dead End 36 25,380 97 11/17/2021
Gala Ct Richmont Wy Dead End 36 10,754 87 11/16/2021
Gatewood Dr Oakview Dr Dead End 40 45,450 86 11/16/2021 Glenhurst Aliso Creek Gate 40 42,600 92 11/16/2021
Golden Eagle Ct Surfbird Ln Dead End 37 11,018 89 11/17/2021 Golden Rain Hopseed Dead End 36 28,910 92 11/16/2021
Goldenfield Diamondgate Dead End 36 5,304 87 11/17/2021 Goldfinch Ln Hummingbird Ln Woodswallow Ln 40 5,920 54 11/17/2021 Grand Ave Aliso Viejo Pkwy Wood Canyon Dr 45 39,405 88 11/16/2021 Grand Ave Aliso Viejo Pkwy Vantis Dr (pvt) 65 15,310 71 11/16/2021 Submitted by: NCE Page 8 of 14 5/20/2022
207
Appendix B
MPAH Street Listing ‐ Current Condition
Street Name From To Width of
Segment (ft) Area (sf) PCI
Most Recent
Inspection
Date
Local Streets
Grandbriar Briarclif f Dead End 36 29,762 85 11/17/2021 Grindlay Pl Monstad St Kewen Wy 40 8,850 89 11/16/2021 Hazelbranch Baylaurel Dead End 36 8,306 86 11/17/2021
Heather Ridge Pacific Park Dr Woodside 40 18,725 61 11/16/2021 Heatherwood Eastwing Dead End 36 34,706 94 11/17/2021
Helmcrest Briarclif f Dead End 36 24,074 83 11/17/2021
Highpoint Stonebrook Dead End 40 39,530 90 11/17/2021
Hollyleaf Hopseed Bottlebrush 36 35,424 93 11/16/2021
Hollyleaf Bottlebrush Dead End 36 40,786 90 11/16/2021 Hollyoak Alicia Pkwy Laurelmont 40 49,000 97 11/16/2021 Hopseed Hollylea f Wood Vista 40 81,920 88 11/16/2021
Hummingbird Ln Aliso Creek San Bittern Ln 40 63,600 81 11/17/2021 Hummingbird Ln San Bittern Ln Dead End 40 42,080 76 11/17/2021 Journey Aliso Creek Pacific Park Dr 45 82,155 82 11/16/2021 Journey Journey (N) Journey (S) 45 144,165 80 11/16/2021 Kara Ct Richmont Wy Dead End 36 10,754 95 11/16/2021
Kewen Wy Grindlay Pl Monstad St 32 17,216 89 11/16/2021 Key Largo Sanborn Cayman Brae 36 21,420 91 11/16/2021
King Eider Ln Calle Corta Dead End 36 36,170 85 11/17/2021 Knollwood Wood Canyon Dr City Line 40 21,120 69 11/16/2021 Laguna Madre Cayman Brac Cape Coral 36 10,224 94 11/16/2021 Lantana Hopseed Dead End 36 29,762 95 11/16/2021
Larkspur Dr Spoonbill Dr Skylark Dr 40 36,430 83 11/17/2021 Laurelmont Alicia Parkway Hollyoak 40 53,435 97 11/16/2021 Laurelwood Wood Canyon Cameo Dr 36 9,036 96 11/16/2021 Liberty Aliso Viejo Pkwy 1033' s/o Aliso Viejo Pkwy 64 66,112 81 11/16/2021 Liberty 1033' s/o Aliso Viejo Pkwy Pursuit 64 139,456 73 11/16/2021 Liberty Pursuit Aliso Creek Rd 64 61,120 80 11/16/2021 Lilac Hollylea f Dead End 36 6,615 95 11/16/2021
Lindengrove Diamondgate Briarclif f 36 41,860 90 11/17/2021 Submitted by: NCE Page 9 of 14 5/20/2022
208
Appendix B
MPAH Street Listing ‐ Current Condition
Street Name From To Width of
Segment (ft) Area (sf) PCI
Most Recent
Inspection
Date
Local Streets
Lynoak Briarglen Dead End 36 10,754 91 11/16/2021
Lyon Ridge Lyon Ridge Dead End 36 28,656 84 11/16/2021 Lyon Ridge Pursuit Lyon Ridge 36 5,652 86 11/16/2021
Lyon Ridge Lyon Ridge Dead End 36 3,168 95 11/16/2021 Macaw St Larkspur Dr Dove 36 9,504 75 11/17/2021
Mallard Dr Moorhen Dead End 36 16,802 75 11/17/2021
Mallorn Dr Rowan Dr Dead End 36 44,166 97 11/16/2021
Maple Dr Poplar Dr Pacific Grove Dr 40 22,680 96 11/16/2021 Mareblu Pacific Park Dead End 38 21,470 97 11/16/2021 Mayflower Shore Cliff Dead End 36 16,406 78 11/17/2021 Meadow Point Skygate Diamondgate 40 19,440 95 11/17/2021 Merlin Ave Surfbird Ln Moorhen Ln 34 56,788 84 11/17/2021 Mesa Cr Lyon Ridge End 36 9,360 90 11/16/2021
Midnight Ct Dawn Ln Dead End 36 6,938 78 11/16/2021
Monstad St Pursuit Grindlay Pl 40 40,610 82 11/16/2021 Monstad St Monstad St End 70 6,010 55 11/16/2021
Moorhen Ln Westwing Mallard Dr 36 14,112 89 11/17/2021 Morning Ridge Alicia Pkwy Creekside 40 22,440 51 11/16/2021 Morning Ridge Creekside Woodside 40 45,040 67 11/16/2021 Myrtle Dr Pacific Park Dr Poplar Dr 40 4,240 98 11/16/2021 Nantais Pierremont Dead End 36 10,754 89 11/16/2021
Northern Pine Loop Ponderosa Ponderosa 36 76,032 94 11/16/2021 Northwinds Westwing Dead End 35 25,680 91 11/17/2021
Nutcracker Ln Cuervo Dr Dead End 39 17,579 89 11/17/2021 Oak Ridge Cir Northern Pine Dead End 36 7,838 76 11/16/2021 Oakgrove Dr Wood Canyon Dr Pleasant Walk 40 53,480 95 11/16/2021 Oakleigh Eastwing Brooktree 30 12,420 87 11/17/2021
Oakview Dr Wood Canyon Dr Crimson Canyon 40 37,600 92 11/16/2021 Oakview Dr Crimson Canyon Endless Vista 40 59,440 86 11/16/2021 Oakview Dr Endless Vista Gate 40 80,370 80 11/16/2021
Submitted by: NCE Page 10 of 14 5/20/2022
209
Appendix B
MPAH Street Listing ‐ Current Condition
Street Name From To Width of
Segment (ft) Area (sf) PCI
Most Recent
Inspection
Date
Local Streets
Orion Liberty End 45 20,115 85 11/16/2021
Osprey Ave Surfbird Ln Dead End 37 11,018 71 11/17/2021 Pacific Grove Dr Oakgrove Dr Maple Dr 40 21,120 97 11/16/2021 Pacific Grove Dr Oakgrove Dr Mallorn Dr 40 4,240 97 11/16/2021 Palm Harbor Cayman Brac Cape Coral 36 10,512 95 11/16/2021 Paradise Bay Chase Cayman Brac 36 5,184 89 11/16/2021
Parisville Grand Dead End 36 15,578 85 11/16/2021
Park Ave Cedarbrook Dead End 40 26,160 95 11/16/2021
Parkwood Eastwind Dead End 36 29,762 94 11/16/2021
Pathfinder Saddleridge Eaglepoint 36 9,504 96 11/17/2021 Peacock Ct Moorhen Ln Dead end 36 10,754 75 11/17/2021 Peppertree Pacific Park Dr Sprucewood 40 46,360 92 11/16/2021 Peppertree Sprucewood End 40 42,690 86 11/16/2021
Pheasant Ln Westwing Dead End 36 35,450 91 11/17/2021
Phoebe Ct Royal Tern Dead End 30 10,430 71 11/17/2021 Picket Ln Wood Canyon Plateau 36 5,098 90 11/16/2021
Pierremont Parisville Dead end 36 33,950 88 11/16/2021 Pinyon Jay Wigeon Ln Bob White 39 8,034 93 11/17/2021 Plateau Wood Canyon Plateau 36 5,076 91 11/16/2021
Plateau North End Picket Ln 36 49,562 93 11/16/2021
Plateau Picket Ln South End 36 17,154 91 11/16/2021
Ponderosa St Sanborn Northern Pine 40 5,160 98 11/16/2021 Poplar Dr Maple Dr Beech Dr 40 21,120 97 11/16/2021
Prairie Falcon Egret Ln Crane St 40 48,920 82 11/17/2021 Prairie Falcon Crane St Dead End 40 34,320 87 11/17/2021 Pursuit Liberty Rue Du Chateau 45 40,050 81 11/16/2021 Pursuit Rue Du Chateau Lyon Ridge 45 69,210 78 11/16/2021 Pursuit Lyon Ridge Aliso Creek Rd 45 71,100 77 11/16/2021 Ramblewood Shorecliff Westwing 34 19,456 88 11/17/2021
Raven Ln Skylark Dr Dead End 36 54,800 82 11/17/2021
Submitted by: NCE Page 11 of 14 5/20/2022
210
Appendix B
MPAH Street Listing ‐ Current Condition
Street Name From To Width of
Segment (ft) Area (sf) PCI
Most Recent
Inspection
Date
Local Streets
Richmont Wy Caledon Ct Kara Ct 36 19,224 95 11/16/2021 Ridgecrest Oakleigh Shorecliff 30 47,520 94 11/17/2021
Rock Rose Canyon Vistas Peppertee 36 74,628 92 11/16/2021 Rosy Finch Ln Westwing Dead End 36 35,894 84 11/17/2021 Rowan Dr Mallorn Birch 36 14,004 97 11/16/2021
Royal Tern Ln Dead End Phoebe 36 35,558 65 11/17/2021
Saddleridge Highpoint Dead End 36 40,742 83 11/17/2021 Sagebrush Timberland Canyon Vistas 40 12,400 94 11/16/2021 San Bittern Ln Hummingbird Ln Dead End 36 30,962 72 11/17/2021 Sanborn Chase Aurora 36 42,804 89 11/16/2021
Sanborn Aurora Wood Canyon Dr 36 35,824 89 11/16/2021
Sandbridge Highpoint Heatherwood 40 46,760 84 11/17/2021 Sanderling Ln Falcon Crest Ln Hummingbird Ln 36 20,484 78 11/17/2021 Satinbush Collingwood Dead End 36 6,326 74 11/17/2021
Scrub Oak Silkwood Dead End 36 17,558 87 11/16/2021
Seagull Ln Surfbird Ln Canyon Wren Ln 40 37,320 78 11/17/2021 Sequoia Dr Pacific Grove Dr Beech Dr 36 26,208 96 11/16/2021 Seton Dr Brookstone Pl Sunbury Dr 36 11,160 96 11/16/2021 Sherwood Dr Deerborn Dr Sunbury Dr 36 19,008 96 11/16/2021 Shining
Star Wy Gatewood Dr End 36 4,922 89 11/16/2021
Shorecliff Ridgecrest Dead End 30 56,690 93 11/17/2021 Sierra Cir Northern Pine Dead End 31 6,985 87 11/16/2021 Silkwood Canyon Vistas Dead End 36 44,666 95 11/16/2021 Skygate Westwing Meadow Point 40 42,240 93 11/17/2021
Skylark Dr Larkspur Dr Eastwing 40 46,520 82 11/17/2021 Solitaire Ln Seagull Ln Dead End 36 38,690 85 11/17/2021 Somerset Dr Sunbury Dr Brookstone Pl 36 9,504 98 11/16/2021 Songbird Ln Trumpeter Ln Firecrest Ln 36 47,520 68 11/17/2021 Sora Ct Westwing Dead End 36 3,478 86 11/17/2021
Southern Hills Dr Bel Flora Ct Dead End 40 40,290 87 11/16/2021 Submitted by: NCE Page 12 of 14 5/20/2022
211
Appendix B
MPAH Street Listing ‐ Current Condition
Street Name From To Width of
Segment (ft) Area (sf) PCI
Most Recent
Inspection
Date
Local Streets
Spicewood Eastwind Dead End 36 30,590 93 11/16/2021
Spoonbill Dr Surfbird Ln Lakespur Dr 40 21,120 88 11/17/2021 Springdale Summerfield Dead End 27 11,016 94 11/16/2021 Sprucewood Canyon Vistas Peppertree 36 87,108 90 11/16/2021 Starling Ln Hummingbird Ln Dead End 36 25,951 54 11/17/2021 Stockbridge Boundary Oak Cranwell 35 22,855 96 11/16/2021 Stone Pine Hopseed Dead End 36 29,762 95 11/16/2021
Stonebrook Westwing Dead End 36 20,258 85 11/17/2021
Style Dr Gatewood Dr Dead End 36 17,510 89 11/16/2021 Style Dr Style Dr End 56 3,528 73 11/16/2021
Sugar Gum Hollylea f Dead End 36 13,310 96 11/16/2021
Sugarbush Bottlebrush Dead End 28 18,890 94 11/16/2021 Summerfield Autumnglen Aliso Creek 40 61,720 95 11/16/2021 Sunbury Dr Sherwood Dr Calypso St 36 22,248 96 11/16/2021 Surfbird Ln Spoonbill Dr Seagull Ln 37 45,657 85 11/17/2021 Surfbird Ln Seagull Ln Dead End 37 26,040 81 11/17/2021 Swan Ln Surfbird Ln Dead End 36 14,510 77 11/17/2021
Tanglewood Westwing Dead End 36 38,990 94 11/17/2021
Thornbird Briarclif f Dead End 36 20,546 84 11/17/2021
Timberbluff Ramblewood Dead End 36 10,862 84 11/17/2021 Timberland Peppertree Dead End 36 84,228 91 11/16/2021 Trumpeter Ln Woodswallow Ln Songbird Ln 36 9,504 45 11/17/2021 Via Iglesia Calle Cortez Moulton Pkwy 40 78,000 80 11/17/2021 Via Iglesia Calle Cortez Moulton Pkwy 40 57,000 81 11/17/2021 Walnut Dr Mallorn Dr End 36 10,954 97 11/16/2021
Westridge Dr Oakview Dr Wood Canyon Dr 40 34,480 82 11/16/2021 Westwing Aliso Creek Ramblewood 40 101,770 89 11/17/2021 Westwing Calle Corta Aliso Creek 40 71,360 83 11/17/2021 White Pelican Ln Blue Heron Ln Dead End 36 10,898 65 11/17/2021 Wigeon Ln Cuervo Dr Pinyon Jay 39 10,296 89 11/17/2021 Submitted by: NCE Page 13 of 14 5/20/2022
212
Appendix B
MPAH Street Listing ‐ Current Condition
Street Name From To Width of
Segment (ft) Area (sf) PCI
Most Recent
Inspection
Date
Local Streets
Willet Ln Hummingbird Ln Royal Turn Ln 36 8,352 79 11/17/2021 Windflower Eastwind Dead End 36 29,762 94 11/16/2021
Windsong Aliso Creek (West) Dead End 44 22,546 91 11/16/2021 Windsong Aliso Creek (East) Cedarbrook 40 56,000 93 11/16/2021 Wolverine Way Aliso Creek Sandcastle 36 34,194 95 11/16/2021 Wolverine Way Sandcastle CDS 36 38,304 96 11/16/2021
Wood Canyon Dr Pacific Park Dr Sanborn 43 57,878 89 11/16/2021 Wood Canyon Dr Sanborn Grand 43 30,179 92 11/16/2021
Wood Canyon Dr Grand Alastair 43 58,222 90 11/16/2021
Wood Canyon Dr Alastair Thistledown 43 23,306 90 11/16/2021 Wood Vista Wy Hopseed Canyon Vista 40 45,440 90 11/16/2021 Woodside Morning Ridge Creekside 40 32,130 70 11/16/2021 Woodstork Ln Skylark Dr Bluejay Dr 36 9,464 85 11/17/2021 Submitted by: NCE Page 14 of 14 5/20/2022
213
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 11
XIII. Appendix C – GIS Digital Data
The required segment attributes are:
• Street name
• Unique segment identifier (Segment ID from original source if available) • Name of intersecting road at the beginning of a segment • Name of intersecting road at the end of the segment
• Current pavement condition index (PCI)
• Current PCI inspection date
• Length of road segment in feet
• Width of road segment in feet
• Paved area of road segment in square feet or square yards • Project PCI at end of Seven-Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan
Please note that the City has requested a waiver regarding the Appendix C-GIS Digital Data Submittal for the 2022 cycle.
214
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 12
XIV. Appendix D – Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Introduction
When performing data collection in any field, the need for quality control is paramount as it is essential for accurate planning, analysis and design. This is particularly true for collecting pavement distress data for a pavement management system.
The Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan establishes minimum quality standards for performance and procedures for updates of the pavement management system.
If applicable, utilize the space below to include information on the agency’s QA/QC policies:
215
City of Aliso Viejo
Public Works Department
12 Journey, Suite 100
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
Quality Control Plan
2021/22 Citywide Pavement Management Program / PMP
10/04/2021
Fountain Valley, CA
17050 Bushard St.
Suite 200
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
216
The content of this report is the confidential property of NCE and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with NCE’s written
authorization.
217
City of Aliso Viejo
Pavement Management Program Update 2022
Quality Control Plan
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction ........................................................................ 1
1.1. Objectives .................................................................................... 1
1.2. Structure ...................................................................................... 1
2. Quality Control Plan ............................................................ 2
2.1. Condition Inspection Procedures ................................................. 2
2.2. Accuracy Required for Data Collection ......................................... 3
2.3. Inspector Qualifications and Experience ...................................... 5
3. Safety Procedures ............................................................... 6
Appendix A1 Resumes of Field Inspectors
218
City of Aliso Viejo
Pavement Management Program Update 2022
Quality Control Plan
1 1. Introduction
The need for quality control is paramount when performing data collection in any field, as it is essential for accurate planning, analysis, and design. NCE’s Quality Assurance Management Plan (QAMP) affirms that:
NCE is dedicated to achieving technical and management excellence and to delivering professional engineering and environmental services that meet or exceed our clients' needs. NCE's Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Program is designed to achieve these goals. This QA Management Plan (QAMP) describes NCE 's QA Program, which is based on four principles: client satisfaction, employee participation, problem prevention, and continuous quality improvements.
NCE's QAMP establishes minimum quality standards for performance and procedures for assuring that our clients receive quality service. It requires the participation of employees at every level. It encourages Project Managers and technical staff to take pride in their work and to assume responsibility for ensuring that the work is done correctly the first time. The QAMP is designed to reduce the incidence of quality-related and, w here necessary , results in corrective actions and modification of work procedures to minimize the incidence of future problems.
NCE has also prepared detailed and specific quality control plans (QCPs) for projects; the most notable example is for the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) – Western Regional Support Contract for the Federal Highway Administration. This is a 150 -page document that covers data collection on highways, including deflection, profile, pavement distresses, traffic, maintenance and rehabilitation history, materials testing and sampling as well as document control.
1.1. Objectives
This document constitutes a formal QCP for the City of Aliso Viejo. It was prepared on October 4, 2021. The QCP focuses on data collection issues as part o f the pavement mana gement update. Specifically, it is intended for the 2021/2022 Pavement Management Update. The focus is on the collection of network‐level pavement distress data. As defined by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis 401 Quality Management of Pavement Data Collection, “Network‐level data collection involves collection of large quantities of pavement condition data, which is often converted to individual condition indices or aggregated into composite condition indices.”
1.2. Structure
The following components are addressed in this QCP:
• Condition inspection procedures used
• Accuracy required for data collection
• Inspector qualifications and experience
• Safety procedures.
219
City of Aliso Viejo
Pavement Management Program Update 2022
Quality Control Plan
2 2. Quality Control Plan
2.1. Condition Inspection Procedures
The governing document for performing condition surveys for the City of Aliso Viejo is ASTM D6433, “ Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Surveys.” Both asphalt concrete (AC) and Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements are included in this protocol. The following distresses are collected for each pavement type.
AC Pavements PCC Concrete (Jointed) Pavements
1. Alligator (fatigue) cracking
2. Bleeding
3. Block cracking
4. Bumps and sags
5. Corrugation
6. Depression
7. Edge cracking
8. Joint reflection cracking
9. Lane/shoulder drop-off
10. Longitudinal and transverse cracking
11. Patching and utility cut patching
12. Polish aggregate
13. Potholes
14. Railroad crossing
15. Rutting
16. Shoving
17. Slippage cracking
18. Swelling
19. Raveling
20. Weathering
1. Blowup/buckling
2. Corner breaks
3. Divided slab
4. Durability (“D”) cracking
5. Faulting
6. Joint seal damage
7. Lane/shoulder drop-off
8. Linear cracking
9. Patching (large) and utility cuts
10. Patching (small)
11. Polished aggregate
12. Popouts
13. Pumping
14. Punchout
15. Railroad crossing
16. Scaling, map cracking, and crazing
17. Shrinkage cracks
18. Spalling (corner)
19. Spalling (joint)
Any exceptions to the ASTM procedures will be discussed with the City before any inspections are performed. Exceptions are usually related to distresses or situations that are not covered in the manuals. Examples include slippage cracks, roller checkmarks, or edge cracking on streets with no curbs and gutters . Others include the raveling of surface seals or surveying the open-graded AC mixes. Any modifications will be documented and submitted to the City for approval.
All distress or condition inspections are performed as semi -automated inspections, and the entire pavement is inspected. Field crews are typically composed of a two -person crew travelling in a van. The crew will collect and record visual distresses using equipment installed in the van.
220
City of Aliso Viejo
Pavement Management Program Update 2022
Quality Control Plan
3 The data will be summarized into sample units and entered into the PAVERTM database. The size of the sample unit will be 2,500± 1,000 square feet as per ASTM D6433 protocols. In addition, the sample units will match the existing management sections set up in the PAVERTM database.
Before the actual inspection work begins the NCE team will perform two Field QC Steps. These are outlined as follows:
Step 1: Calibration
The first steps in this process is having NCE’s field technician and Marker Geospatial’s field manager meet in the field, drive a few roads, and review some of the variety of pavement conditions that exist in the City of Aliso Viejo . This is a valuable exe rcise to calibrate or synchronize the team’s view of the various distresses and ensure a consistent product.
Step 2: Quality Control
The QC team conduct s an independent review of the pavement condition data collected on the City’s pavement network. Since semi-automated distress data collection is different from the walking protocols, this is required to ensure that the pavement data collected is consistent with those protocols.
Up to 20 pavement sites were selected for quality control purposes. They incl uded a range of:
• Pavement Types (AC or PCC)
• Functional Classifications
• Pavement condition or age
An independent NCE technician will be selecting the 20 sites and performing a detailed walking inspection. The semi-automated team will then perform a blind test on these sites and the results will be compared.
Acceptability Criteria
The types and severities of the distresses must be the same and quantities within ±10% of each other. If corrections are required on more than 10% of the calibration sites, then an additional four sites will be selected and compared. This will continue until more than 95% of the calibration sites meet the acceptability criteria.
2.2. Accuracy Required for Data Collection
The accuracy required for data collection has two components, both of which are further described in the following paragraphs.
221
City of Aliso Viejo
Pavement Management Program Update 2022
Quality Control Plan
4 • Re-inspections
• PCI comparisons with past inspections
2.2.1 Re-Inspection “Check”
At least 5% of all inspections are randomly re-inspected by other team members. A different inspector will review these sites and determine the revised pavement distress measurements.
If the initial inspection is determined to be inaccurate, the original inspector is given refresher training before being allowed to continue with any further inspections. Should the data be inaccurate for a certain day, all the data for that day will be re -inspected following refresher training to ensure accuracy.
Acceptability Criteria
At the time of re -inspection, the actual distresses will be re -inspected and verified, and any corrections made, if necessary. Distress types and severities must be the same and re - measured quantities within ±10% of the original measured quantity.
If cor rections are required on more than 10% of the re -inspected sample units, then an additional 5% will be re-inspected. This will continue until more than 95% of the re-inspected sections meet the acceptability criteria.
2.2.2 PCI Comparison with Past Inspections
As another level of quality control, the new PCIs are compared with the previous PCIs. If they differ by more than ±10 PCI points, these sections are automatically flagged for further investigation.
If PCI Increases 10 points:
The section is investigated to see if a maintenance and rehabilitation event has occurred since the last inspection, but which has not been recorded. This can only be resolved with feedback from the City. Typically, it may include activities such as:
• Crack sealing activities – changes medium or high severity cracking to low severity • Patching activities - alligator cracking that has been removed and patched, so that the resultant PCI is increased.
• Surface seals
• Overlay
Therefore, an up-to-date maintenance and rehabilitation history file in the PAVERTM database is desirable, both for historical accuracy as well as to provide additional quality control.
222
City of Aliso Viejo
Pavement Management Program Update 2022
Quality Control Plan
5 If PCI Decreases 10 points:
The section is checked to see if the average deterioration rate (usually 3 to 4 points per year) is exceeded. If the drop in PCI is within the acceptable range, no further action is required. If the drop is more than the acceptable range, a re -inspection will be performed. The default performance curves in the pavement management software form the basis for acceptability.
2.3. Inspector Qualifications and Experience
All NCE’s inspectors are required to attend formal training on condition distress inspections.
For example, any of NCE’s inspectors working on the LTPP project are required to attend a week-long training workshop every year to maintain their certifications. The Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) of Washoe County requires inspectors to be calibrated prior to performing any work using the ASTM D6433 protocols (also known as the pavement management inspections).
For pavement management (or ASTM D6433) inspections, NCE’s technicians underwent the Orange County Transportation Authority technician prequalification exercise held in January 2021/2022.
Similarly, in agencies that use the StreetSaver® system, NCE’s inspectors attend the distress training conducted by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission ( MTC). After the formal training, technicians work with an experienced inspector before they are allowed to work on their own. Within the first month of working on their own, up to 20% of their work is checked weekly. Any necessary corrections are made immediately.
Finally, NCE conducts a one-day training and calibration workshop for all NCE staff involved with data collection. This is conducted once a year. The following table lists the inspectors assigned to this project and their most recent training date.
Inspector Name Date of Distress
Training
Training
Conducted by:
Joseph De Leon November 3, 2021 Lisa K. Senn
Franc Escobedo November 3, 2021 Lisa K. Senn
Resumes of technicians utilized on this project are included in Appendix A1.
223
City of Aliso Viejo
Pavement Management Program Update 2022
Quality Control Plan
6 3. Safety Procedures
NCE administers a health and safety program in compliance with the Nevada Occupational Safety and Health Act (Section 618.383) and Cal ifornia Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Title VIII, Section 3203. The program is documented in NCE's Workplace Safety Program Manual, which can be provided upon request.
Generally, the safety procedures include:
• Inspectors wear a Class 2 safety vest at all times.
• Flashing beacons are placed on all vehicles utilized for inspections. • Stopped vehicles are to be parked at locations away from moving traffic (nearby parking, shoulders etc.).
• For higher volume streets, inspectors usually use the sidewalk, and move i n the face of traffic when conducting survey. This will furnish them with more time and provides them with better chances in escaping a dangerous situation involving incoming vehicles.
On streets where there is a high volume of traffic or high speeds, additional measures may be necessary, such as:
• Inspections occur during off-peak periods or on weekends. • An additional inspector attends to watch out for traffic. • Traffic flaggers are provided in extreme cases.
In extreme cases where it is not possible to walk on the pavement surface, inspections will be performed from sidewalks or raised medians. However, this is extremely rare for city or county roads/streets; this is most often encountered on state highways, and lane closures are the most likely option in that circumstance.
All NCE inspectors are required to take online safety programs annually as administered by “Click Safety.” These classes include:
• Workzone Traffic Safety Tips for Construction.
• Cal Heat Illness Prevention for all Industry Workers. • Cal Person Protective Equipment for Construction.
224
Appendix A1
Resumes of Field Inspectors
225
Education
Computer Operations Program,
Computer Learning Center, Los
Angeles, CA, 1983-84
Network Engineering &
Administrative Program
Computer Learning Center, Anaheim,
CA, 1997
Certified Network Administration
Computer Learning Center, Anaheim,
CA 1997
Registrations and Certifications
OCTA PAVER Certification (expires
2023)
MTC StreetSaver® Rater Certification
Program (expires November 2023)
Joined NCE
2004
Total Years of Experience
22 years
Franc Escobedo
Engineering Field Technician
Franc has over 21 years of experience as a pavement management technician for NCE. He has performed numerous pavement condition inspections throughout California, Idaho and Washington. His experience includes distress collection across various Pavement Management Systems, including the Metropolitan Transportation Commission StreetSaver®, PAVER, Cartographs, and Hansen systems.
Additionally, Franc has completed both the OCTA PAVER and MTC “Distress Identification” courses for both asphalt concrete and portland cement pavements and now assists with the training of agency staff on both courses.
Franc performs all activities relating to pavement data collection using hardcopy forms or tablets. As part of the quality control process, he performs cross-checks of data in the PMS database. He regularly performs quality control checks of field collected data and pavement maintenance history to ensure that PMS databases are accurate and up-to-date.
During this process, he generates detailed reports that are necessary to perform his cross- checks of the collected data.
His field experience and expertise are added benefits to agencies during field training.
Listed below are a collection of agencies for which Mr. Escobedo has performed condition inspections – they total over 6,000 centerline miles of roads and streets.
Representative Projects
Projects included various forms of inspections for pavement distress data collection, such as walking, windshield, and/or semi-automated.
City and County of San Francisco, As-Needed Pavement Condition Survey Services, APE15117
City of San Francisco, CA
Engineering Technician. Pavement distress surveyor. Scope: Since 2016, NCE performed condition surveys on almost 1,000 centerline miles of streets. A particular challenge in 2016 and 2017 was th e change in distress protocols when weathering and raveling were split into two different distresses; this resulted in an increase of the Pavement Condition Index, further confirmed by a research study. Project cost: $868,796.
City of Berkeley, Pavement Management System Updates
City of Berkeley, CA
Engineering Technician. Pavement distress surveyor. Scope: NCE is updating StreetSaver® and providing a five-year paving plan for 2018 – 2022. For the first four years the City will select streets for treatment based on criteria identified under Measure M. Project cost:
$49,900.
County of Sonoma Pavement Management Update
Sonoma County, CA
Engineering Technician. Pavement distress surveyor. Scope: The scope included updating existing pavement management system annually, developing pavement treatment strategies, conducting budgetary analysis, and providing non-pavement needs assessment.
Project cost: $823,981.
226
Franc Escobedo
2 | P a g e
City and County of San Francisco As-Needed Pavement Engineering Services, San Francisco International Airport (SFIA), City of San Francisco, CA
Engineering Technician. Pavement distress surveyor. Scope: Since 2011, NCE has provided on-call pavement consultant services on a very complex airfield environment under tight security, conducted forensic analysis on the portland cement concrete (PCC) apron areas, and implemented the PAVER™ PMS. NCE performed the pavement designs for Runway 10R -28L, Plot 40, and Plot 12, determined the structural adequacy and performed mechanistic pavement designs using FAARFIELD for Runways 1L/19R and Taxiways E, F, and L. Determined the ACN/PCN for all runways and taxiways. NCE conducted forensic analysis on a new taxiway exhibiting premature large -scale reflective block cracking and rutting at Boarding Area A and dimpling of Taxiways B and M. NCE designed a high stability asphalt concrete mix to solve this problem. Developed mitigation plan for premature failure of thin-bonded PCC overlay on access roads Developed construction guidelines for long lasting longitudinal joints within asphalt concrete pavements.
Updated the PAVER™ Airport PMS and performed automated distress surveys as per ASTM D5340. Digital images were collected, and the information was used to update SFIA’s GIS and asset management system. Prepared final reports on the funding and maintenance needs for the next 20 years for the Federal Aviation Administration. NCE is currently providing similar pavement services to SFIA as a subconsultant through 2022. Project cost: $1.2 million.
County of Orange Program Management System Updates
Orange County, CA
Engineering Technician. Pavement distress surveyor. Scope: Scope includes verifying the road inventory for a road network (67 4 centerline miles), surveying the roads using ASTM D6433 -11 protocols, updating the maintenance history, developing maintenance strategies, performing multiple budget scenarios, linking to a GIS shapefile, developing a seven-year work plan, and preparing reports.
Concurrent with the pavement condition survey, mobile data coll ection units gathered high -resolution 360 degree geo -referenced right-of-way street level digital imagery along with 3D point cloud data. Assets collected included markings, signs, curb ramps, signals, and drainage features. Work provided from 2009-2020. Project cost: $2.3 million.
Pavement Management
Pavement Management Inspections
Engineering Field Technician
Ada County, Idaho
Agoura Hills
Aliso Viejo
Antioch
Auburn, WA
Anaheim
Bakersfield
Baldwin Park
Bell
Brentwood
Buena Park
Burbank
Camarillo
Campbell
Carmel
Carson
Chula Vista
Commerce
Contra Costa
County
Corona
Cudahy
Cypress
Dana Point
Diamond Bar
Dinuba
Downey
East Palo Alto
El Centro
Elk Grove
Encinitas
Fairfield
Fremont
Fresno County
Fullerton
Hayward
Highland
Hillsborough
Humboldt County
Inyo County
La Habra
Lake Forest
Las Vegas
Lemon Grove
Livermore
Mammoth Lakes
Manhattan Beach
Marina
Marin County
Martinez
Mendocino County
Milpitas
Mission Viejo
Mono County
Monterey
Monterey County
Moreno Valley
Mountain View
Napa County
Newport Beach
Oakland
Orange
Orange County
Oxnard
Pacific Grove
Palm Springs
Poway
Redwood City
Richmond
Rogue River
National Forest
San Bruno
San Clemente
San Diego County
San Francisco
San Marino
San Mateo County
San Ramon
Santa Barbara
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz County
Santa Maria
Santa Monica
Seal Beach
Siskiyou County
Sonoma County
South Lake Tahoe
Stanislaus County
Stanton
State of Nevada
State of Oregon
State of Washington
Thousand Oaks
Torrance
Tulare
Tuolumne County
Tustin
Umpqua National
Forest
Vallejo
Vernon
Vista
Walnut Creek
West Covina
West Sacramento
Whittier
Yorba Linda
227
Education
Mendocino College
Registrations and Certifications
OCTA PAVER Certification (expires
2023)
MTC StreetSaver® Rater Certification
Program (expires 2023)
Joined NCE
2017
Total Years of Experience
5 years
Joseph DeLeon
Field Technician
Joseph DeLeon joined NCE in 2017 as a pavement management technician and is experienced in collecting distress data for pavement management systems. Apart from conducting field inspections, he has performed all functions related to data collection and is an active partic ipant in the quality control process. As part of this process, he performs cross -checks of data in the PMP database. Joseph has performed quality control checks of field collected data and pavement maintenance history to ensure that PMP databases are accur ate and up to date. During this process, he generates detailed reports, needed to help perform his crosschecks of the data collected. Joseph has completed the Orange County Transportation Authority’s (OCTA) PAVER™ ‘Distress Identification’ course for Asphalt Concrete and Portland Cement Pavements. Joseph is also certified by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) to perform pavement distress inspections; the certification testing involves passing a rigorous field test to test the inspector’s knowledge of the distress procedures once a year. The Pavement Inspector Certification/Testing covers both ASTM D6433 for PAVER™ and StreetSaver® modified ASTM D6433 distress types.
Representative Projects
Pavement Asset Management
Pavement Condition Surveys
Various Cities and Counties, CA
Field Technician. Listed below are a collection of agencies that he has performed condition inspections. Projects included various forms of inspections for pavement distress data collection, such as walking, windshield and/or semi-automated Some of his current/past PMP/PMS clients include.
Baldwin Park
Buena Park
Clearlake
Downey
El Cajon
Elk Grove
Fairfield
Highland
Garden Grove
Kings County
Lake County
Lake Forest
Lakeport
Martinez
Oakland
Orange City
Orange Cove
Pacific Grove
San Buenaventura
Sand City
Santa Ana
Sonoma County
South Gate
Stockton
Thousand Oaks
Torrance
Ventura
Pavement Management System
County of Sonoma, CA
Field technician. Responsible for c ollecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected rural mountain roads and residential streets in East Sonoma County.
Pavement Management System
City of Elk Grove CA
Field Technician . Responsible for c ollecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected residential, collector and arterial streets in Elk Grove.
228
Joseph DeLeon
2 | P a g e
Pavement Management System
City of Stockton, CA
Field Technician. Responsible for collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected urban arterials and residential streets in Stockton.
Pavement Management System
City of Martinez, CA
Field Technician. Responsible for collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected urban arterials and residential streets in Martinez.
Pavement Management System
City of San Buenaventura, CA
Field Technician. Responsible for collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected urban collectors and arterials and residential roads in Ventura.
Pavement Management System
City of Torrance, CA
Field Technician. Responsible for collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected urban arterials in Torrance.
Pavement Management System
City of El Cajon, CA
Field Technician. Responsible for collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected urban arterials and residential streets in El Cajon.
Pavement Management System
City of Buena Park, CA
Field Technician. Responsible for collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected urban arterials and residential streets in Buena Park.
Pavement Management System
City of Lakeport, City of Clearlake, County of Lake, CA Field Tech nician. Responsible for c ollecting distress data for AC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected rural mountain roads, rural residential roads and rural arterials in the cities of Lakeport, Clearlake and Lake County.
Database Creation
County of Santa Cruz, CA
Field Technician . Responsible for c ollecting distress data for AC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected rural mountain roads, rural residential roads and rural arterials in Central Santa Cruz County. This data was modif ied off three separate paper databases which NCE merged into one StreetSaver® database.
Database Creation
City of Sand City, CA
Field Technician. Responsible for collecting distress data for AC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected industrial collectors for the City of Sand City. This data was modified off an old paper database used by Monterey County to create a StreetSaver® database for Sand City.
Pavement Management System
City of Pacific Grove, CA
Field Technician . Responsible for c ollecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected residential and collector streets in Pacific Grove.
229
Joseph DeLeon
3 | P a g e
Pavement Management System
City of King City, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected residential, collector and arterial streets in Pacific Grove.
Pavement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP)
City of Fairfield, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected residential, collector and arterial streets in Fairfield.
Pavement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP) / Quality Control (QC) City of Oakland, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected residential, collector and urban arterial streets in Northern, Southeast, Downtown and Central Oakland including Jack London Square and Lake Merritt. Also conducted quality control on residential and arterials in Western Oakland.
Control Sections
City of Anaheim, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected control sections for a prior automated survey.
Distress Data Quality Control
City of Cypress, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Conducted windshield inspections on fresh slurry seals in residential Cypress.
Control Sections
City of Thousand Oaks, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected control sections for a prior automated survey.
Pavement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP)
City of Yuba City, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected residential, collector and arterial streets in Yuba City.
Pavement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP) / Quality Control (QC) County of Marin, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected residential, collector and arterial streets in Marin County. Conducted quality control.
Novato Sidewalks
City of Novato, CA
Field Technician. Collected and catalogued sidewalk distresses into a GIS point-cloud using a TRIMBLE device with a modified version of MTC8.
Control Sections
City of Hanford, City of Lemoore, County of Kings, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Selected and inspected control sections in the cities of Hanford, Lemoore and parts of Kings County for a prior automated survey.
230
Joseph DeLeon
4 | P a g e
Pavement Management Systems
City of Downey, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected residential, collector and urban arterial streets in Downey.
Pavement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP)
County of Alameda, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected urban residential streets and rural valley roads in and around Hayward, Castro Valley, Livermore and Altamont.
Automated Survey
County of Calaveras, CA
Field Technician. Drove automated rig to conduct automated survey on rural mountain roads in Calaveras County.
Pavement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP)
City of Novato, CA
Field Technician . Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected residential and collector streets in Novato.
Pavement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP) / Quality Control (QC) City and County of San Francisco, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected urban residential, collector and arterial streets in the Sunset, Lake Merced, Twin Peaks and Mission Districts of San Francisco, as well as quality control in other adjacent areas.
Automated Survey
City of Elk Grove, CA
Field Technician. Drove automated rig to conduct automated survey on residential roads in Elk Grove.
Automated Data Quality Control
City of Richmond, CA
Field Technician. Conducted quality control on automated data which used the old MTC7 system for industrial arterials in Eastern and Central Richmond.
GIS / Automated Survey / Control Sections
City of Citrus Heights, CA
Field Technician. Used StreetS aver® linkage portal to prepare GIS network for field use. Drove automated rig to conduct automated survey on residential roads and urban arterials in Citrus Heights, followed by inspection of control sections.
Automated Survey / Control Sections
City of Garden Grove, CA
Field Technician. Drove automated rig to conduct automated survey on residential roads and urban collectors and arterials in Garden Grove, followed by inspection of control sections.
Pavement Management Systems
City of Santa Ana, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected residential and collector streets as part of a full network update for Santa Ana.
San Francisco MUNI Distress Data Collection
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected the asphalt lanes where MUNI light rails are installed on Market Street from 1st to 36th street. 231
Joseph DeLeon
5 | P a g e
Automated Survey / Control Sections
City of Baldwin Park, CA
Field Technician. Drove automated rig to conduct automated survey on residential roads and urban collectors and arterials in Baldwin Park, followed by inspection of control sections.
Pavement Management Systems
City of Santa Ana, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected residential, collector and urban arterial streets in Buena Park.
Whittier Boulevard Pavement Management Systems
City of Whittier, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected every block of urban arterial Whitter Boulevard from beginning to end.
Pavement Management Systems
City of Santa Barbara, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distre ss data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected residential, collector and urban arterial streets in Santa Barbara.
Automated Survey / Control Sections
City of Redondo Beach, CA
Field Technician. Drove automated rig to conduct aut omated survey on residential roads and urban arterials in Redondo Beach, followed by inspection of control sections.
Distress Data Quality Control
City of West Covina, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Conducted quality control on arterials and collectors in West Covina.
Pavement Management Systems
City of South Gate, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected residential, collector and urban arterial streets in South Gate.
Pavement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP)
County of Sonoma, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC surfaces according to the MTC8 system. Inspected residential streets, rural arterials and mountain roads in Northern, Central, Southeast and Northwest Sonoma County.
Automated Survey / Control Sections
City of Elk Grove, CA
Field Technician. Drove automated rig to conduct automated survey on residential roads in Elk Grove, followed by inspection of control sections.
Distress Data Quality Control
City of Redondo Beach, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Conducted quality control for prior automated survey in Redondo Beach.
Automated Survey / Control Sections
City of San Clemente, CA
Field Technician . Drove automated rig to conduct automated survey on residential roads and arterials in San Clemente, followed by inspection of control sections.
232
Joseph DeLeon
6 | P a g e
Pavement Management Systems
City of Newport Beach, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Conducted windshield inspections on residential, collector and alleyways in Newport Beach.
Automated Survey / Control Sections / Trench Cuts
City of Anaheim, CA
Field Technician. Drove automated rig to conduct automated survey on residential roads and arterials in Anaheim, followed by inspection of control sections. Also conducted trench cut surveys for upcoming arterial maintenance.
Automated Survey / Control Sections
City of Manhattan Beach, CA
Field Technician. Drove automated rig to conduct automated survey on residential roads and arterials in Manhattan Beach, followed by inspection of control sections.
Pavement Management Systems
City of Stanton, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected urban arterials in Stanton.
Pavement Management Systems
City of Torrance, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected urban arterials in Torrance.
Orange County Automated Survey
City of Dana Point, County of Orange, CA
Field Technician. Drove automated rig to conduct automated survey on resi dential roads and collectors in Dana Point, Las Flores, North Tustin and Rossmoor.
Automated Survey
City of Kingman, AZ
Field Technician. Drove automated rig to conduct automated survey on residential roads, collectors and arterials in Kingman.
Distress Data Quality Control
City of San Marino, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Conducted quality control for prior inspections.
Pavement Management Systems
City of Ventura, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Inspected residential, collector and urban arterial streets in Ventura.
Distress Data Quality Control
City of Cypress, CA
Field Technician. Collecting distress data for AC/PCC surfaces according to the ASTM19/20 system. Conducted quality control for prior inspections in Cypress.
233
Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 13
XV. Appendix E – Pavement Management Data Files
The Pavement Management data files shall be submitted to OCTA in spreadsheet format. This must include the following information:
• Street name and limits for all public streets
• Street identifiers (Branch ID, Section ID)
• Direction (if applicable)
• Beginning and ending of each section
• Length, widths, and true areas
• Functional Classification (MPAH, Local)
• Number of travel lanes
• PCI and date of inspection
• Type of recommended treatment
• Cost of recommended treatment
The Pavement Management data files are attached here as a CD, or included as Appendix E
234
City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: June 15, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mitzi Ortiz, MMC, City Clerk
SUBJECT: BIENNIAL REVIEW OF THE CITY’S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE Recommended Action:
Direct staff to review the City’s Conflict of Interest Code for updates and submit its findings to Council by October 1, 2022.
Fiscal Impact:
None.
Background:
Pursuant to the Political Reform Act, the City adopted a Conflict of Interest Code which consists of standard provisions contained in Section 18730 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations, as amended. The Code also designates City officials, officers, employees, and consultants who make or participate in making governmental decisions which may affect their financial interests, who must disclose those interests in certain financial disclosure statements, and who must disqualify themselves from making or participating in the making of governmental decisions affecting those interests.
The Political Reform Act requires the City Council, as the code reviewing body, to direct staff to review the Code by July 1 of each even-numbered year. Staff must then submit a biennial notice to Council by October 1 indicating whether amendments are needed. If so, the amended Code will be presented to Council for approval by resolution.
Discussion:
The City’s first Conflict of Interest Code was adopted in 2001. The Code has subsequently been reviewed biennially with the last amendment approved in 2020. With Council direction, staff will begin a thorough review of the Code with assistance from the City Attorney’s office. Staff will submit its findings to Council for consideration by October 1, 2022.
235
City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: June 15, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: David A. Doyle, City Manager
SUBJECT: AGREEMENT FOR FY 2022-23 LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES Recommended Action:
Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement with the County of Orange for FY 2022-23 law enforcement services.
Fiscal Impact:
The cost for the agreement with the County of Orange for FY 2022-23 law enforcement services is $9,917,082. Approximately three years ago, the Board of Supervisors approved a new labor contract for Orange County Sheriff’s Department employees. The agreement amount for FY 2022-23 increased by approximately $412,712 or 4.34%. This increase is due to a combination of the aforementioned agreed upon salary increases, the implementation of the body worn camera (BWC) system, and overhead costs compared to the prior year.
Background:
The City of Aliso Viejo has contracted with the County of Orange for the Sheriff-Coroner to provide law enforcement services since 2001. Over the past few years, the City has decreased staffing by ½ an investigator resulting in shared cost and case load with the City of Laguna Woods. The School Resource Officer is a shared annual cost with the City of Laguna Niguel and the supervisors are a shared resource with the Cities of Laguna Hills and Laguna Woods with each paying a third for four patrol supervisor positions. See below for a breakdown of personnel for the City of Aliso Viejo. [Continued on next page.]
236
Discussion:
Law Enforcement Services Agreement
Staff FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23
Captain 1 1
Administrative Sergeant 1 1
Patrol Sergeants 1.33 1.33
Investigators 1.5 1.5
Patrol Deputies (DSII) 14 14
School Resource Officer .65 .65
Motorcycle Deputies 2 2
Directed Enforcement Deputy (DSII) 1 1
Sworn Compliment 22.48 22.48
Community Service Officer 2 2
Emergency Manager 1 1
Non-Sworn 3 3
Attachments:
1. Law Enforcement Services Agreement
2. Cost Spreadsheet
237
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
AND THE
COUNTY OF ORANGE
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this First day of May 2022, which date is enumerated for purposes of reference only, by and between the CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, hereinafter referred to as “ CITY”, and the COUNTY OF ORANGE, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as “COUNTY”.
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, CITY wishes to contract with COUNTY for law enforcement services; and
WHEREAS, COUNTY is agreeable to the rende ring of such services, as authorized in Government Code Sections 51301 and 55632, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
238
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
A. TERM…………. ........................................................................................ 3 B. OPTIONAL TERMINATION OR EXTENSION .......................................... 3 C. REGULAR SERVICES BY COUNTY ........................................................ 3 D. ENHANCED AND SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES BY COUNTY ............... 6 E. BODY WORN CAMERA AND IN CAR VIDEO ......................................... 9 F. LICENSING SERVICES BY CITY ........................................................... 10 G. PAYMENT ............................................................................................... 10 H. NOTICES ................................................................................................ 14 I. STATUS OF COUNTY ............................................................................ 14 J. STATE AUDIT ........................................................................................ 15 K. ALTERATION OF TERMS ...................................................................... 15 L. INDEMNIFICATION ................................................................................ 15 M. TRAFFIC VIOLATOR APPREHENSION PROGRAM ............................. 17 N. MOBILE DATA COMPUTERS ................................................................ 19 O. E-CITATION UNITS ................................................................................ 21 SIGNATURE PAGE....................................................................................... 23 Attachment A: Regular Services by County
Attachment B: City Ordinances
Attachment C: Payment
Attachment D: County Billing Policy
Attachment E: Forfeited and Seized Asset Policy
Attachment F: TVAP Resolution
Attachment G: TVAP Form
//
//
239
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
A. TERM:
The term of this Agreement shall commenc e July 1, 2022 and terminate June 30, 2023 unless earlier terminated by either party or extended in the manner set forth herein.
B. OPTIONAL TERMINATION OR EXTENSION:
1. COUNTY or CITY may terminate this Agreeme nt, without cause, upon one - hundred and eighty (180) days written notice to the other party.
2. If COUNTY and CITY have not entered into a written agreement by June 30, 2023 for COUNTY to provide to CITY, during all or part of the period between July 1, 2023 and June 30, 2024, law e nforcement services similar to those specified herein, then SHERIFF, on behalf of COUNTY, and CITY’s Manager, on behalf of CITY, are authorized to execute a written amendment to this Agreement that provides as follows and does not materially alter other te rms of the Agreement: SHERIFF shall continue to provide to CITY all or a designated part of the law enforcement services specified herein, for a specified time period between July 1, 2023 and August 31, 2023, and CITY shall pay COUNTY the full costs of pr oviding such services. Such full costs may be greater than those listed herein for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. SHERIFF and CITY Manager shall file copies of any such amendments to this Agreement with the Clerk of COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors and CITY’s Clerk.
C. REGULAR SERVICES BY COUNTY:
1. COUNTY, through its Sheriff -Coroner and deputies, officers and employees, hereinafter referred to as “SHERIFF”, shall render to CITY law enforcement services as hereinafter provided. Such services shal l include the enforcement of lawful State statutes and lawful municipal ordinances of CITY other than licensing ordinances.
//
240
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
C. REGULAR SERVICES BY COUNTY: (Continued)
2. The night, day and evening patrol and supervisory shifts will be established by SHERIFF. Personnel of each shift may work varying and different times and may be deployed to other shifts when, in the opinion of SHERIFF and CITY Manager, the need arises. Any long -term shift deployment change will be reported to the CITY’s Council.
3. The level of service, other than for licensing, to be provided by the COUNTY for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, is set forth in Attachment A and incorporated herein by this reference.
4. For any service listed in Attachment A of this Agreement that is provided to CITY at less than 100% of a full -time SHERIFF position, COUNTY retains the option to terminate such service in the event the other city or cities that contract(s) for the balance of the time of the employee providing the service no longer pay(s) for such service and CITY does not request the Agreement be amended to provide for payment of 100% of the cost of the employee providing such service. The Maximum Obligation of CITY set forth in Subsection G-2 will be adjusted accordingly.
5. All services contracted for in this Agreement may not be operational on the precise date specified in this Agreement. In those instances, SHERIFF shall notify CITY Manager of the date or dates such service or services are to be implemented. COUNTY shall reduce the mon thly charges to CITY, based on the actual date of implementation of the service or services. Charges shall be reduced on the next monthly billing tendered in accordance with Subsection G-3 of this Agreement.
6. During emergencies, such as mutual aid situat ions, SHERIFF will attempt to leave in CITY the Captain in charge of CITY Police Services. If SHERIFF determines that the Captain is needed elsewhere, SHERIFF will notify CITY’s Manager within four (4) hours. SHERIFF will return the Captain to 241
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
C. REGULAR SERVICES BY COUNTY: (Continued)
CITY as soon as possible once the emergency situation is under control.
7. With respect to the licensing ordinances of CITY listed in Attachment B hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference, SHERIFF shall receive applications for CITY licenses pursuant to said ordinances and complete investigations relating to such applications. Said investigations shall be forwarded to CITY Manager. COUNTY shall not provide any advisory, administrative, hearing or litigation a ttorney support or services related to licensing. COUNTY shall not provide any administrative or investigatory services related to the licensing ordinances listed in Attachment B hereto, except the investigations relating to initial applications for which this subsection provides.
8. With the limitations set forth below, SHERIFF, on behalf of COUNTY, and CITY Manager, on behalf of CITY, are authorized to execute written amendments to this Agreement to increase or decrease the level of service set forth in Attachment A, when SHERIFF and CITY Manager mutually agree that such increase or decrease in the level of service is appropriate. Any such amendment to the Agreement shall concomitantly increase or decrease the cost of services payable by CITY set forth in Attachment C and incorporated herein by this reference, and the Maximum Obligation of CITY set forth in Subsection G-2, in accordance with the current year’s COUNTY law enforcement cost study. SHERIFF and CITY Manager shall file copies of any such amendm ents to this Agreement with the Clerk of COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors and CITY’s Clerk. Amendments to this Agreement executed by SHERIFF and CITY Manager may not, in the aggregate, increase or decrease the cost of services payable by CITY by more than on e percent (1%) of the total cost originally set forth in Attachment C and the Maximum Obligation originally set forth in Subsection G-2. 242
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
C. REGULAR SERVICES BY COUNTY: (Continued)
Prior approval by COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors and CITY’s Council is required before execution of any amendment that brings the aggregate total of changes in costs payable by CITY to more than one percent (1%) of the total cost originally set forth in Attachment C and the Maximum Obligation originally set forth in Subsection G-2 of this Agreement.
D. ENHANCED AND SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES BY COUNTY:
1. Enhanced services for events on CITY property. At the request of CITY, through its City Manager, SHERIFF may provide enhanced law enforcement services for functions, such as community events , conducted on property that is owned, leased or operated by CITY. SHERIFF shall determine personnel and equipment needed for such enhanced services. To the extent the services provided at such events are at a level greater than that specified in Attachment A of this Agreement, CITY shall reimburse COUNTY for such additional services, at an amount computed by SHERIFF, based on the current year's COUNTY law enforcement cost study. The cost of these enhanced services shall be in addition to the Maximum Obl igation of CITY set forth in Subsection G-2 of this Agreement. SHERIFF shall bill CITY immediately after each such event.
2. Supplemental services for occasional events operated by private individuals and entities on non -CITY property. At the request of CIT Y, through its City Manager, and within the limitations set forth in this Subsection D-2, SHERIFF may provide supplemental law enforcement services to preserve the peace at special events or occurrences that occur on an occasional basis and are operated by private individuals or private entities on non -CITY property. SHERIFF shall determine personnel and equipment needed for such supplemental services, and will provide such supplemental services only if SHERIFF is able to do so without reducing the normal and regular 243
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
D. ENHANCED AND SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES BY COUNTY: (Continued) ongoing services that SHERIFF otherwise would provide to CITY pursuant to this Agreement. Such supplemental services shall be provided only by regularly appointed full -time peace of ficers, at rates of pay governed by a Memorandum of Understanding between C OUNTY and the bargaining unit representing the peace officers providing the services. Such supplemental services shall include only law enforcement duties and shall not include services authorized to be provided by a private patrol operator, as defined in Section 7582.1 of the Business and Professions Code. Law enforcement support functions, including, but not limited to, clerical functions and fore nsic science services, may be perf ormed by non -peace officer personnel if the services do not involve patrol or keeping the peace and are incidental to the provision of law enforcement services. CITY shall reimburse COUNTY its full, actual costs of providing such supplemental services at a n amount computed by SHERIFF, based on the current year's COUNTY law enforcement cost study. The cost of these supplemental services shall be in addition to the Maximum Obligation of CITY set forth in Subsection G-2 of this Agreement. SHERIFF shall bill CITY immediately after each such event.
3. Supplemental services for events operated by public entities on non -CITY property. At the request of CITY, through its City Manager, and within the limitations set forth in this S ubsection D-3, SHERIFF may provide supplemental law enforcement services to preserve the peace at special events or occurrences that occur on an occasional basis and are operated by public entities on non-CITY property. SHERIFF shall determine personnel and equipment needed for such suppleme ntal services, and will provide such supplemental services only if SHERIFF is able to do so without reducing services that SHERIFF otherwise would provide to CITY pursuant to this Agreement. CITY shall reimburse COUNTY its full, actual costs of 244
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
D. ENHANCED AND SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES BY COUNTY: (Continued) providing such supplemental services at an amount computed by SHERIFF, based on the current year's COUNTY law enforcement cost study. The cost of these supplemental services shall be in addition to the Ma ximum Obligation of CITY set forth in Subsection G-2 of this Agreement. SHERIFF shall bill CITY immediately after each such event.
4. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CITY, through its permit process, may utilize the services of SHERIFF at events, for which CI TY issues permits, that are operated by private individuals or entities or public entities. SHERIFF shall determine personnel and equipment needed for said events. If said events are in addition to the level of services listed in Attachment A of this Agreement, CITY shall reimburse COUNTY for such additional services at an amount computed by SHERIFF, based upon the current year’s COUNTY law enforcement cost study. The cost of these services shall be in addition to the Maximum Obligation of CITY set forth in Subsection G-2 of this Agreement. SHERIFF shall bill CITY immediately after said services are rendered.
5. In accordance with Government Code Section 51350, COUNTY has adopted Board Resolution 89 -1160 which identifies Countywide services, including but n ot limited to helicopter response. SHERIFF through this contract provides enhanced helicopter response services. The cost of enhanced helicopter response services is included in the cost of services set forth in Attachment C and in the Maximum Obligation of CITY set forth in Subsection G -2. COUNTY shall not charge any additional amounts for enhanced helicopter services after the cost of services set forth in Attachment C and in the Maximum Obligation set forth in Subsection G -2 has been established without written notification to the CITY. //
245
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
E. BODY WORN CAMERA AND IN CAR VIDEO:
1. As part of the law enforcement services to be provided to CITY, COUNTY has provided, or will provide , body worn cameras (hereinafter called “BWC”) that will be worn by SHERIFF’S p ersonnel and In Car Video (hereinafter called “ICV”) that will be mounted in vehicles designated by SHERIFF for use within CITY service area.
2. SHERIFF has the exclusive right to use said BWC and ICV for law enforcement services related to this Agreement.
3. CITY shall pay COUNTY the full costs to COUNTY of a) the acquisition of BWC and the acquisition and installation of ICV and b) recurring costs, as deemed necessary by COUNTY, including the costs of maintenance and contributions to a fund for replacement and upgrade of such BWC and ICV when they become functionally or technologically obsolete.
The costs to be paid by CITY for recurring costs, including maintenance and replacement/upgrade of BWC and ICV , are included in the costs set forth in Attachment C and the Maximum Obligation of CITY set forth in Subsection G-2 of this Agreement unless CITY has already paid such costs.
CITY shall not be charged additional amounts for maintenance or replacement/upgrade of said BWC and ICV during the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023.
4. If, following the initial acquisition of BWC and ICV referenced above, CITY requires BWC and ICV for additional SHERIFF’S p ersonnel or vehicles designated for use in the CITY service area, COUNTY will purchase said additional BWC and ICV . Upon demand by COUNTY, CITY will pay to COUNTY a) the full costs of acquisition of additional BWC and the full cost of acquisition and installation of additional ICV, and b) the full recurring costs for said BWC and ICV , as deemed necessary by COUNTY, including the costs of maintenance, and contributions to a fund for replacement and 246
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
E. BODY WORN CAMERA AND IN CAR VIDEO: (Continued)
upgrade of such BWC and ICV when they become functionally or technologically obsolete. Said costs related to addi tional BWC and ICV are not included in, and are in addition to, the costs set forth in Attachment C and the Maximum Obligation of CITY set forth in Subsection G -2 of this Agreement.
5. COUNTY will replace and/or upgrade BWC and ICV as needed. The costs of r eplacing/upgrading BWC and ICV shall be paid by COUNTY from the replacement/upgrade funds to be paid by CITY in accordance with the foregoing. CITY shall not be charged any additional charge to replace or upgrade BWC and ICV.
F. LICENSING SERVICES BY CITY:
Upon receipt from COUNTY of investigations of applications for licenses referred to in Subsection C -7 of this Agreement, CITY Manager shall determine whether to grant or deny the licenses and will issue the licenses or notify the applicants of denial. CITY shall provide all attorney services related to the granting, denial, revocation and administration of said licenses and the enforcement of CITY ordinances pertaining to said licenses.
G. PAYMENT:
1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 51350, CITY agrees to pay to COUNTY the full costs of performing the services mutually agreed upon in this Agreement. The costs of services include salaries, wages, benefits, mileage, services, supplies, equipment, and divisional, departmental and COUNTY General overhead.
2. Unless t he level of service set forth in Attachment A is increased or decreased pursuant to mutual agreement of the parties, or CITY is required to pay for increases as set forth in Subsection G-4, the Maximum Obligation of CITY for full cost of services, other than Licensing Services, set forth in 247
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
G. PAYMENT: (Continued)
Attachment A of this Agreement, to be provided by the COUNTY for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, shall be $9,917,082 as set forth in Attachment C.
The overtime costs included in th e Agreement are only an estimate.
SHERIFF shall notify CITY of actual overtime worked during each fiscal year. If actual overtime worked is above or below budgeted amounts, billings will be adjusted accordingly at the end of the fiscal year. Actual overtime costs may exceed CITY’s Maximum Obligation.
3. COUNTY shall invoice CITY monthly. During the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, said invoices will require payment by CITY of one- twelfth (1/12) of the Maximum Obligation of CITY set forth in Subsection G-2 of this Agreement, as said Maximum Obligation may have been increased or decreased pursuant to mutual agreement of the parties. In addition, if a determination is made that increases described in Subsection G -4 must be paid, COUNTY thereafter sh all include the pro -rata charges for such increases in its monthly invoices to CITY for the balance of the period between July 1, 2022 and June 30, 2023.
4a. At the time this Agreement is executed, there may be unresolved issues pertaining to potential changes in salaries and benefits for COUNTY employees. The cost s of such potential changes are not included in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 costs set forth in Attachment C nor in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Maximum Obligation of City set forth in Subsection G -2 of thi s Agreement. If the changes result in the COUNTY incur ring or becom ing obligated to pay for increase d costs for or on account of personnel whose costs are included in the calculations of costs charged to CITY hereunder, CITY shall pay COUNTY, in addition to the Maximum Obligation set forth in Subsection G-2 of this Agreement, the full costs of said increases to the 248
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
G. PAYMENT: (Continued)
extent such increases are attributable to work performed by such personnel after July 1, 2022, and CITY’s Maximum Obli gation hereunder shall be deemed to have increased accordingly. CITY shall pay COUNTY in full fornsuch increases on a pro -rata basis over the portion of the period between July 1, 2022 and June 30, 2023 remaining after COUNTY notifies CITY that increases are payable. If the changes result in the COUNTY incurring or becoming obligated to pay for decreased costs for or on account of personnel whose costs are included in the calculations of costs charged to CITY hereunder, COUNTY shall reduce the amount owed by the CITY to the extent such decreases are attributable to work performed by such personnel during the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, and CITY’s Maximum Obligation hereunder shall be deemed to have decreased accordingly.
COUNTY shall reduce required payment by CITY in full for such decreases on a pro -rata basis over the portion of the period between July 1, 2022 and June 30, 2023 remaining after COUNTY notifies CITY that the Maximum Obligation has decreased.
4b. If CITY is required to pay fo r increases as set forth in Subsection G-4a above, COUNTY, at the request of CITY, will thereafter reduce the level of service to be provided to CITY as set forth in Attachment A of this Agreement to a level that will make the Maximum Obligation of CITY hereunder for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 an amount specified by CITY that is equivalent to or higher or lower than the Maximum Obligation set forth in Subsection G -2 for said period at the time this Agreement originally was executed. The purpose of such adjustment of service levels will be to give CITY the option of keeping its Maximum Obligation hereunder at the pre-increase level or at any other higher or lower level specified by CITY. In the event of such reduction in level of service 249
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
G. PAYMENT: (Continued)
and adjustment of costs, the parties shall execute an amendment to this Agreement so providing. Decisions about how to reduce the level of service provided to CITY shall be made by SHERIFF with the approval of CITY.
5. CITY shall pay COUNTY in accordance with COUNTY Board of Supervisors’ approved County Billing Policy, which is attached hereto as Attachment D and incorporated herein by this reference.
6. COUNTY shall charge CITY late payment penalties in accordance with County Billing Policy.
7. As payment for the Licensing Services described in Subsection C -7 of this Agreement, COUNTY shall retain all fees paid by applicants for licenses pursuant to CITY ordinances listed in Attachment B hereto. Retention of said fees by COUNTY sh all constitute payment in full to COUNTY for costs incurred by COUNTY in performing the functions related to licensing described in Subsection C -7; provided, however, that if any of said fees are waived or reduced by CITY, CITY shall pay to COUNTY the diff erence between the amount of fees retained by COUNTY and the fees that were set forth in the ordinances listed in Attachment B at the time this Agreement was executed. If CITY increases the fee schedule for the licensing ordinances set forth in Attachment B, either party shall have the right to seek amendment of this Agreement with respect to the division of the increased fees between CITY and COUNTY.
8. Fees generated or collected by SHERIFF contract personnel for copying of documents related to the servi ces provided in this Ag reement will be at COUNTY established rates and will be credited to CITY on an annual basis.
9. Narcotic asset forfeitures will be handled pursuant to Attachment E hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference.
//
250
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
H. NOTICES:
1. Except for the notices provided for in Subsection 2 of this Section, all notices authorized or required by this Agreement shall be effective when written and deposited in the United States mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed as follows:
CITY: ATTN: CITY MANAGER
12 JOURNEY, SUITE #100
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 - 5335
COUNTY: ATTN: LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT MANAGER
SHERIFF-CORONER DEPARTMENT
320 NORTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 108
SANTA ANA, CA 92703
2. Termination notices shall be e ffective when written and deposited in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested and addressed as above.
I. STATUS OF COUNTY:
COUNTY is, and at all times shall be deemed to be, an independent contractor.
Nothing herein contained shall be co nstrued as creating the relationship of employer and employee, or principal and agent, between CITY and COUNTY or any of COUNTY’s agents or employees. COUNTY and its SHERIFF shall retain all authority for rendition of services, standards of performance, c ontrol of personnel, and other matters incident to the performance of services by COUNTY pursuant to this Agreement. COUNTY, its agents and employees shall not be entitled to any rights or privileges of CITY employees and shall not be considered in any manner to be CITY employees.
//
//
//
251
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
J. STATE AUDIT:
Pursuant to Government Code Section 8546.7, CITY and COUNTY shall be subject to examination and audit by the State Auditor for a period of three (3) years after final payment by CITY to COUNTY under this Agr eement. CITY and COUNTY shall retain all records relating to the performance of this Agreement for said three-year period, except that those records pertaining to any audit then in progress, or to any claims or litigation, shall be retained beyond said th ree- year period, until final resolution of said audit, claim or litigation.
K. ALTERATION OF TERMS:
This Agreement fully expresses all understanding of CITY and COUNTY with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement and shall constitute the total Agreement between the parties for these purposes. No addition to, or alteration of, the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing, formally approved and executed by duly authorized agents of both parties.
L. INDEMNIFICATION:
1. COUNTY, its officers , agents, employees, subcontractors and independent contractors shall not be deemed to have assumed any liability for the negligence or any other act or omission of CITY or any of its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors or independent contractors, or for any dangerous or defective condition of any public street or work or property of CITY, or for any illegality or unconstitutionality of CITY’s municipal ordinances. CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY, and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, employees, subcontractors and independent contractors from any claim, demand or liability whatsoever based or asserted upon the condition of any public street or work or property of CITY, or upon the illegality or unconstitutionality of any municipal ordinance of CITY that SHERIFF has enforced, or upon any act or omission of CITY, or its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, employees, subcontractors or 252
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
L. INDEMNIFICATION: (Continued)
independent contractors related to this Agreement, including, but not limited to, any act or omission related to the maintenance or condition of any vehicle or motorcycle that is owned or possessed by CITY and used by COUNTY personnel in the performance of this Agreement, for property damage, bo dily injury or death or any other element of damage of any kind or nature, and CITY shall defend at its expense including attorney fees, and with counsel approved in writing by COUNTY, COUNTY and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, emplo yees, subcontractors and independent contractors in any legal action or claim of any kind based upon or asserted upon such condition of public street or work or property, or illegality or unconstitutionality of a municipal ordinance, or alleged acts or omi ssions. If judgment is entered against CITY and COUNTY by a court of competent jurisdiction because of the concurrent ac tive negligence of either party, CITY and COUNTY agree that liability will be apportioned as determined by the court. Neither party shall request a jury apportionment.
2. COUNTY shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, employees, subcontractors and independent contractors from any claim , demand or liability whatsoever based or assert ed upon any act or omission of COUNTY or its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, employees, subcontractors or independent contractors related to this Agreement, for property damage, bodily injury or death or any other element of damage of an y kind or nature, and COUNTY shall defend, at its expense, including attorney fees, and with counsel approved in writing by CITY, CITY and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, employees , subcontractors and independent contractors in any l egal action or claim of any kind based or asserted upon such alleged acts or omissions.
253
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
M. TRAFFIC VIOLATOR APPREHENSION PROGRAM:
1. COUNTY has established a Traffic Violator Apprehension Program [“the Program”], which is operated by SHERIFF, and is designed to reduce vehicle accidents caused by unlicensed drivers and drivers whose licenses are suspended and to educate the public about the requirements of the Vehicle Code and related safety issues with regard to driver licensing, vehicle registration, vehicle operation, and vehicle parking. The Program operates throughout the unincorporated areas of the COUNTY and in the cities that contract with COUNTY for SHERIFF’s law enforcement services, without regard to jurisdictional boundaries, because an area -wide approach to reduction of traffic accidents and driver education is most effective in preventing traffic accidents. In order for CITY to participate i n the Program, CITY has adopted fees pursuant to Vehicle Code S ection 22850.5, in the same amount as approved by COUNTY, as set forth in the resolution that is attached hereto as Attachment F and incorporated into this Agreement by reference [hereinafter called a “TVAP resolution”], and has directed that the revenue from such fee be used for the Program. CITY’ s participation in the Program may be terminated at any time by rescission or amendment of its TVAP resolution that is attached hereto as Attachment F. In the event CITY 1) amends said TVAP resolution, or rescinds said TVAP resolution and adopts a new res olution TVAP pertaining to the above -referenced fees and the Program, and 2) remains a participant in the Program thereafter, CITY’s Manager, on behalf of CITY, and SHERIFF, on behalf of COUNTY, have authority to execute an amendment of this Agreement to s ubstitute CITY’s amended or new TVAP resolution for Attachment F hereto, as long as said amendment to this Agreement does not materially change any other provision of this Agreement. As COUNTY updates its fees for the program periodically. COUNTY will provide written notice to CITY of the updated 254
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
M. TRAFFIC VIOLATOR APPREHENSION PROGRAM: (Continued)
fees. CITY’S participation in the Program will terminate if CITY determines not to adopt the updated fees for the Program.
2. COUNTY will make available for re view, at the request of CITY, all financial data related to the Program as may be requested by CITY.
3. Fee revenue generated by COUNTY and participating cities will be used to fund the following positions, which will be assigned to the Program:
Ten one hundredths of one (0.10) Sergeant
(8 hours per two-week pay period)
One (1) Staff Specialist
(80 hours per two-week pay period)
One (1) Office Specialist
(80 hours per two-week pay period)
4. Fee revenue generated by CITY may be used to reimburse CITY for expenditures for equipment and/or supplies directly in support of the Program. In order for an expenditure for equipment and/or supplies to be eligible for reimbursement, CITY shall submit a request for and obtain pre - approval of the expenditure by using the form as shown in Attachment G.
The request shall be submitted within the budget schedule established by SHERIFF. SHERIFF shall approve the expenditure only if both of the following conditions are satisfied: 1) there are sufficient Program funds, attributable to revenue generated by CITY’s fee, to pay for the requested purchase, and 2) CITY will use the equipment and/or supplies, during their entire useful life, only for purposes authorized by its TVAP resolution in effect at the time of purchase. In the event that CITY terminates its participation in the Program, CITY agrees that the equipment purchased by CITY and reimbursed by Program funds will continue to be used, during the remainder of its useful life, exclusively for the purposes authorized by CITY’s 255
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
M. TRAFFIC VIOLATOR APPREHENSION PROGRAM: (Continued)
TVAP resolution in effect at the time of purchase.
5. In the event the fees adopted by COUNTY, CITY and other participating jurisdictions are not adequate to continue operation of the Program at the level at which it operated previously, COUNTY, at the option of CITY, will reduce the level of Program service to be provided to CITY or will continue to provide the existing level of Program services. COUNTY will charge CITY the cost of any Program operati ons that exceed the revenue generated by fees. Such charges shall be in addition to the Maximum Obligation of CITY set forth in Subsection G -2 of this Agreement. The amount of any revenue shortfall charged to CITY will be determined, at the time the reve nue shortfall is experienced, according to CITY’s share of Program services rendered. In the event of a reduction in level of Program service, termination of Program service or adjustment of costs, the parties shall execute an amendment to this Agreement so providing. Decisions about how to reduce the level of Program service provided to CITY shall be made by SH ERIFF with the approval of CITY.
N. MOBILE DATA COMPUTERS:
1. As part of the law enforcement services to be provided to CITY, COUNTY has provided, or w ill provide, mobile data computers (hereinafter called “MDCs”) that are or will be mounted in patrol vehicles and motorcycles, designated by COUNTY for use within CITY limits.
2. SHERIFF has the exclusive right to use said MDCs for law enforcement services related to this Agreement.
3. CITY shall pay COUNTY the full costs to COUNTY of a) the acquisition and installation of MDCs that are or will be mounted in patrol vehicles and motorcycles assigned to CITY, and b) recurring costs, as deemed necessary by COUNTY, including the costs of maintenance and contributions to a fund 256
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
N. MOBILE DATA COMPUTERS: (Continued)
for replacement and upgrade of such MDCs when they become functionally or technologically obsolete.
The costs to be paid by CITY for recurring costs, in cluding maintenance and replacement/upgrade of MDCs, are included in the costs set forth in Attachment C and the Maximum Obligation of CITY set forth in Subsection G-2 of this Agreement unless CITY has already paid such costs. CITY shall not be charged ad ditional amounts for maintenance or replacement/upgrade of said MDCs during the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023.
4. If, following the initial acquisition of MDCs referenced above, CITY requires MDCs for additional patrol cars or motorcycles designa ted for use in the CITY, or for CITY’s Emergency Operations Center, COUNTY will purchase said additional MDCs. Upon demand by COUNTY, CITY will pay to COUNTY a) the full costs of acquisition and installation of said additional MDCs, and b) the full recurr ing costs for said MDCs, as deemed necessary by COUNTY, including the costs of maintenance, and contributions to a fund for replacement and upgrade of such MDCs when they become functionally or technologically obsolete. Said costs related to additional MDCs are not included in, and are in addition to, the costs set forth in Attachment C and the Maximum Obligation of CITY set forth in Subsection G-2 of this Agreement.
5. COUNTY will replace and/or upgrade MDCs as needed. The costs of replacing/upgrading MD Cs shall be paid by COUNTY from the replacement/upgrade funds to be paid by CITY in accordance with the foregoing. CITY shall not be charged any additional charge to replace or upgrade MDCs.
//
//
257
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
O. E-CITATION UNITS:
1. As part of the law enforcement service s to be provided to CITY, COUNTY has provided, or will provide, E -Citation units designated by COUNTY for use within CITY limits.
2. SHERIFF has the exclusive right to use said E -Citation units for law enforcement services related to this Agreement.
3. CITY shall pay COUNTY the full costs to COUNTY of a) the acquisition of E-Citation units that are assigned to CITY, and b) recurring costs, as deemed necessary by COUNTY, including the costs of maintenance and contributions to a fund for replacement an d upgrade of such E -Citation units when they become functionally or technologically obsolete.
The costs to be paid by CITY for recurring costs, including maintenance and replacement/upgrade of E-Citation units, are included in the costs set forth in Attachment C and the Maximum Obligation of CITY set forth in Subsection G-2 of this Agreement unless CITY has already paid such costs.
CITY shall not be charged additional amounts for maintenance or replacement/upgrade of said E -Citation units during the pe riod July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023.
4. If, following the initial acquisition of E -Citation units referenced above, CITY requires additional E-Citation units designated for use in CITY, COUNTY will purchase said additional E -Citation units. Upon demand b y COUNTY, CITY will pay to COUNTY a) the full costs of acquisition of said additional E - Citation units, and b) the full recurring costs for said E -Citation units, as deemed necessary by COUNTY, including the costs of maintenance, and contributions to a fun d for replacement and upgrade of such E -Citation units when they become functionally or technologically obsolete. Said costs related to additional E-Citation units are not included in, and are in addition to, the costs set forth in Attachment C and the Maximum Obligation of CITY 258
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
O. E-CITATION UNITS: (Continued)
set forth in Subsection G-2 of this Agreement.
5. COUNTY will replace and/or upgrade E -Citation units as needed. The costs of replacing/upgrading E -Citation units shall be paid by COUNTY from the replacement/upgrade funds to be paid by CITY in accordance with the foregoing. CITY shall not be charged any additional charge to replace or upgrade E-Citation units.
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
259
260
ATTACHMENT A
LEVEL OF SERVICE PROVIDED BY SHERIFF:
Title Detail Quantity Frequency
MANAGEMENT:
Captain 1.00
SUPERVISION:
Sergeant Administrative 1.00 80 hrs./ per two wk. pay period Sergeant Patrol 1.00 80 hrs./ per two wk. pay period
Sergeant (shared) Patrol 0.33 26.40 hrs./ per two wk. pay period INVESTIGATION SERVICES:
Investigator 1.00 80 hrs./ per two wk. pay period
Investigator (shared) 0.50 40 hrs./ per two wk. pay period PATROL AND TRAFFIC SERVICES*:
Deputy Sheriff II -Patrol Patrol 15.00 each, 80 hrs./ per two wk. pay period Deputy Sheriff II -Motor Traffic 2.00 each, 80 hrs./ per two wk. pay period ADDITIONAL SERVICES:
Community Services Officer Parking Control 2.00 each, 80 hrs./ per two wk. pay period Deputy Sheriff II (shared) School Resource Officer 0.65 52 hrs./ per two wk. pay period Sr. Emerg. Mgmt. Prog. Coord. 1.00 80 hrs./ per two wk. pay period TOTAL 25.48
* Deployment to be determined by SHERIFF in cooperation with CITY Manager REGIONAL / SHARED STAFF:
Title Regional Team Quantity % Allocation
TRAFFIC:
Sergeant Traffic 0.60 5.36%
Deputy Sheriff II Traffic 4.00 5.36%
Investigative Assistant Traffic 2.00 5.36%
Office Specialist Traffic 1.00 5.36%
AUTO THEFT:
Sergeant Auto Theft 0.30 4.99%
Investigator Auto Theft 2.00 4.99%
Investigative Assistant Auto Theft 1.00 4.99%
Office Specialist Auto Theft 1.00 4.99%
DET:
Sergeant DET 1.00 11.98%
Investigator DET 1.00 11.98%
COURTS:
Investigative Assistant Courts 2.00 9.80%
MOTORCYCLE (shared Supervision):
Sergeant Motorcycle Supervision 1.00 8.16%
TOTAL 16.90
"REGULAR SERVICES BY COUNTY"
(Subsection C-3)
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF-CORONER
FY 2022-23 LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT
05/09/17
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
ATTACHMENT B
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
ORDINANCE NO. 2010-126
LICENSING
ADULT BUSINESS ENTERTAINER PERMIT INCLUDES DANCE INSTRUCTOR (NUDE), DANCE STUDIO (NUDE), FIGURE MODEL (NUDE), FIGURE MODEL
STUDIO (NUDE), INTERLOCUTRIX (NUDE), INTRODUCTORY SERVICE, AND
RAP SESSION (NUDE)
BINGO GAME
CANVASSER/SOLICITOR
ESCORT SERVICES
JUNK COLLECTOR
JUNK DEALER
MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT (Includes FBI fees)
MASSAGE PRACTITIONER/TECHNICIAN (Includes FBI fees)
PEDDLER
POOL ROOM
PUBLIC DANCE
RETAIL SALE OF FIREARMS/GUN DEALER
SECONDHAND DEALER (PAWNBROKER)
SECURITY SYSTEM
TAXICAB STAND
262
ATTACHMENT C
COST OF SERVICES PROVIDED BY SHERIFF (Subsection G-2):
Title Detail Quantity
Cost of Service
(each)
Cost of Service
Total
MANAGEMENT:
Captain 1.00 443,024$ 443,024$
SUPERVISION:
Sergeant Administrative 1.00 370,408$ 370,408$ Sergeant Patrol 1.00 370,408$ 370,408$
Sergeant (shared) Patrol 0.33 370,408$ 122,235$ INVESTIGATION SERVICES:
Investigator 1.00 365,635$ 365,634$
Investigator (shared) 0.50 365,635$ 182,818$ PATROL AND TRAFFIC SERVICES:
Deputy Sheriff II -Patrol Patrol 15.00 307,545$ 4,613,175$ Deputy Sheriff II -Motor Traffic 2.00 312,557$ 625,114$ ADDITIONAL SERVICES:
Community Services Officer Parking Control 2.00 145,384$ 290,768$ Deputy Sheriff II (shared) School Resource Officer 0.65 307,545$ 199,905$ Senior Emerg. Mgmt. Prog. Coord. 1.00 196,088$ 196,088$ TOTAL POSITIONS 25.48 7,779,577$
REGIONAL / SHARED STAFF:
Title Regional Team Quantity % Allocation Cost $
TRAFFIC:
Sergeant Traffic 0.60 5.36% 15,835$
Deputy Sheriff II Traffic 4.00 5.36% 81,477$
Investigative Assistant Traffic 2.00 5.36% 16,700$
Office Specialist Traffic 1.00 5.36% 6,501$
AUTO THEFT:
Sergeant Auto Theft 0.30 4.99% 7,352$
Investigator Auto Theft 2.00 4.99% 34,525$
Investigative Assistant Auto Theft 1.00 4.99% 7,797$
Office Specialist Auto Theft 1.00 4.99% 5,837$
DET:
Sergeant DET 1.00 11.98% 51,984$
Investigator DET 1.00 11.98% 48,189$
COURTS:
Investigative Assistant Courts 2.00 9.80% 30,734$
MOTORCYCLE (shared Supervision):
Sergeant Motorcycle Supervision 1.00 8.16% 31,936$
TOTAL REGIONAL/SHARED 16.90 338,867$
OTHER CHARGES AND CREDITS (Subsection G-2):
OTHER CHARGES:
CREDITS:
TOTAL OTHER CHARGES AND CREDITS 1,798,638$
TOTAL COST OF SERVICES (Subsection G-2) 9,917,082$
ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF-CORONER
FY 2022-23 LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
"PAYMENT"
(Subsection G-2)
Credits include: AB109 (2011 Public Safety Realignment); estimated vacancy credits; false alarm fees; reimbursement for training and miscellaneous programs; and retirement rate discount for FY 2022-23; reimbursement for restitution.
Other Charges include: Annual leave paydowns and apportionment of cost of leave balances paid at end of employment; Body Worn Camera (BWC) and In Car Video (ICV); contract administration; data line charges; enhanced helicopter response services; E-Citation recurring costs for two (2) units; facility lease; holiday pay; Integrated Law & Justice of Orange County fees; Mobile Data Computer (MDC) recurring cost for eighteen and thirty-three hundredths (18.33) units; overtime; patrol training cost allocation; premium pay for biligual staff, education incentive pay and on-call; services and supplies; and transportation charges.
263
ATTACHMENT D
COUNTY BILLING POLICY
APPROVED BY BOARD MINUTE ORDER DATED OCTOBER 27, 1992
I. POLICY
All County agencies/departments/districts (County) governed by the Board of Supervisors shall bill contracting entities for materials and/or services pr ovided under contract in accordance with the following standardized billing and collection policy. Billing frequency is dependent on whether the contract is a fixed price or actual cost contract. Payment due date is designed to be both responsive to the County’s cash flow needs and reasonable enough as to not require special processing by the contracting entity. If payments are not received by the required due dates, a late payment fee shall be computed and billed to the contracting entity in accordance with the requirements of this procedure.
Nothing herein shall affect the liability, including pre -judgment interest, of the contracting party for services or materials in as much as this is a policy to enact standard billing practices.
II. DEFINITIONS
A. Contract for the purposes of this policy - A contract is a formal written agreement, a purchase order from the contracting entity, or any other acceptable mutual understanding between the contracting parties.
B. Received by the County - The phrase “received by the County”, as used in Section VI of this policy, refers to the date a payment is received by the County. It is defined as the date the payment is in the County’s possession. It is not the date the payment is posted or deposited by the County.
III. FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS
A. Fixed Price (One-Time/Non-Recurring Contracts) - Invoices that represent a billing for a one-time, non -recurring provision of materials and/or services shall be issued no later than five (5) working days after delivery by the County o f the materials and/or services.
Examples of such one -time, non -recurring provision of materials and/or services might be a city contracting with the Sheriff for security service at a parade or sporting event; or, a city purchasing a computer listing cont aining certain city-requested data. Payment due date shall be invoice date plus 30 days.
B. Fixed Price (Ongoing/Recurring Contracts) - Invoices that represent a billing for an ongoing, recurring provision of materials and/or services shall be issued accord ing to the following frequency:
1. Annual Billings that total $10,000 or less per 12 -month period shall be billed via one (1) annual invoice. Annual invoices will be issued for each 12 -month period of the contract, or portions thereof. Invoices shall be is sued no later than five working days after the beginning of each 12-month period. Payment due date shall be invoice date plus 30 days.
264
2. Quarterly Billings that are greater than $10,000 but not more than $200,000 per 12 - month period, shall be billed in qu arterly installments. Quarterly invoices will be issued representing the contract amount for each 12 -month period of the contract, or portions thereof, prorated into four (4) installments. Invoices shall be issued no later than 30 days after the beginning of each quarter. Payment due date shall be 60 days after the beginning of each calendar quarter.
3. Monthly Billings that are greater than $200,000 per 12 -month period shall be billed in monthly installments. Monthly invoices will be issued representing the contract amount for each 12-month period of the contract, or portions thereof, prorated into 12 installments. Invoices shall be issued on or before the first day of each service month. Payment due date shall be 30 days after the beginning of each ser vice month.
An example of a fixed price contract for ongoing, recurring provision of materials and/or services might be a city contracting with the Sheriff for law enforcement services.
IV. ACTUAL COST CONTRACTS
A. Actual Cost (One-Time/Non-Recurring Contracts) - Invoices that represent a billing for a one-time, non -recurring provision of materials and/or services shall be issued after delivery by the County of the materials and/or services and no later than 15 days after actual cost data is available. Payment due date shall be invoice date plus 30 days.
B. Actual Cost (Ongoing/Recurring Contracts) - Invoices that represent a billing for an ongoing, recurring provision of materials and/or services shall be issued on a monthly basis and shall represent the cos t of materials and/or services provided to the contracting entity during the previous calendar month. Such invoices shall be issued no later than 15 days after the close of the monthly billing period. If the County agency/department/district does not uti lize a monthly billing cycle, the invoice shall be issued no later than 15 days after actual cost data is available. Payment due date shall be invoice date plus 30 days.
Examples of actual cost contracts for the ongoing, recurring provision of materials and/or services might be a city contracting with the County for communications equipment repair or waste disposal at a County landfill.
V. PAYMENT DUE DATES
Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections II and III above, payment due date shall be at least invoice date plus 30 days. If the County is late in issuing an invoice, the contracting entity would always have at least invoice date plus 30 days to pay. If the County is early in issuing an invoice, the contracting entity would still have a payment due date of either 60 days after the beginning of the quarter (quarterly invoices) or 30 days after the beginning of the service month (monthly invoices).
(EXAMPLES: An invoice for October service, dated and issued October 8 (late) would have a payment due date of November 7. An invoice for August service, dated and issued July 20 (early) would have a payment due date of August 30.)
265
VI. LATE CHARGES
The late payment of any invoiced amount by a contracting entity will cause the County to incur costs not contemplated by the County/contracting entity agreement, the exact amount of such cost will be extremely difficult to ascertain. Such costs include, but are not limited to, costs such as administrative follow -up and processing of delinquent notices, incre ased accounting costs, etc.
Late charges will be assessed in the following situations:
Over-the-counter payments will be assessed a late charge if any payment is not received by the County by the payment due date.
Payments transmitted to the County via the U.S. Mail that have the payer’s postage meter mark will be assessed a late charge if any payment is not received by the County by the payment due date plus one day.
Payments transmitted to the County via the U.S. Mail that have a U.S. Post Office postmark dated after the payment due date will be assessed a late charge.
The late charge assessed in each of these situations shall be three -quarters of one percent (0.75%) of the payment due and unpaid plus $100.00 for late payments made within 30 days of the payment due date. An additional charge of three -quarters of one percent (0.75%) of said payment shall be added for each additional 30 -day period that the payment remains unpaid. Late charges shall be added to the payment and invoiced to the contractin g entity in accordance with this policy.
VII. COLLECTIONS
Any invoice remaining unpaid 90 days after the invoice date shall be referred to the Auditor - Controller for subsequent collection action, such as deduction from contracting entity moneys on deposit with the County Treasurer in accordance with Government Code Section 907 and any other applicable provision of law. Non -payment of invoices and applicable late charges will constitute a breach of contract for which the County retains all legal remedies including termination of the contract.
VIII. DISCOUNT FOR EARLY PAYMENT
Any payment received by the County from a contracting entity 20 days or more before the payment due date shall be entitled to a discount of one -quarter of one percent (0.25%). If the contracting entity takes a discount, and the payment is received by the County less than 20 days before the payment due date, County staff shall immediately notify the contracting entity by telephone that the discount should not have been taken and that the balance is due by the original payment due date.
If the balance is not received by the County in accordance with the dates as specified in Section VII, applicable late charges shall be calculated on the balance due.
266
IX. DEFERRED REVENUE
At fiscal year end, any portion of revenue invoiced (not necessarily received) during the fiscal year being closed out that represents charges or prepayment for materials and/or services for the upcoming fiscal year shall be reclassified from a revenue account to a deferred revenue account (liability). In the new fiscal year the deferred revenue shall be reclassified to a revenue account. (EXAMPLE: On June 1, 19X1, a city is invoiced $48,000 which represents charges for the 12 -month period June 1, 19X1 to May 31 , 19X2. The amount to be reclassified to deferred revenue would be $44,000, representing 11/12ths of the total amount. In July 19X1, the $44,000 would be reclassified to revenue.) Reclassification entries shall be made by Auditor -Controller Agency Accou nting units, or for those agencies/departments/districts without such a unit, the agency/department/district shall notify the Auditor-Controller of the amounts to be reclassified.
X. COST RECOVERY
All County agencies/department/districts shall include al l costs of providing contracted services in contract rates. Including all direct costs, allocated indirect costs such as departmental and County (CWCAP) overhead, and cost of capital financing.
XI. EXISTING CONTRACTS
Billing terms and provisions contain ed in existing contracting entity agreements (existing as of the date this policy is approved by the Board of Supervisors) shall remain in effect for the life of the contract. However, when these existing contracts are renegotiated, they shall contain the billing provisions as set forth in this policy.
XII. DEVIATIONS FROM POLICY
Deviations from this policy shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors. Proposed deviations by agencies/departments/districts shall be submitted to the CEO for concurrence in advance of filing an Agenda Item Transmittal (AIT) with the Clerk of the Board. The CEO, or his/her designee, shall advise the agency/department/district of approval or disapproval of the proposed deviations. If a County agency/department/district subm its a contract to the Board of Supervisors for approval, and the billing provisions in the contract deviate from this policy, the agency/department/district shall specifically advise the Board of Supervisors in the AIT of the deviation, the reason for the deviation, and of the CEO’s recommendation relative thereto.
267
5/7/2020 Rev.
ATTACHMENT E
P
OLICY FOR DISTRIBUTION OF FORFEITED AND SEIZED ASSETS
BACKGROUND
T
he Orange County Sheriff’s Department provides contract law enforcement services to cities in Orange County. Because of the increased likelihood that contracted patrol or investigation personnel may become involved in significant narcotic seizures, which could affect law enforcement services provided by the Sheriff’s Department to contract cities, the following policy is in effect.
CONTRACTED PATROL AND INVESTIGATION OFFICERS
W
hen assets (cash or property) are seized in CITY by contracted patrol or investigation personnel, and subsequently forfeited to COUNTY’s Sheriff Department, hereinafter referred to as “SHERIFF”, the forfeited assets shall be shared with CITY as set forth below, for the purpose of augmenting law enforcement services in CITY, subject to guidelines by the forfeiting agency of such sharing and use of forfeited assets. A portion of forfeited assets may be retained by SHERIFF, to pay for departmental expenses not recovered through law enforcement contracts.
I
n such cases, pursuant to the forfeiting agency’s guidelines, SHERIFF shall apply to the forfeiting agency for the return of a share of assets. In his application, SHERIFF shall specify the percentage of shared assets returned to SHERIFF that will be used to augment law enforcement services in CITY and the use of said assets by CITY.
I
n those cases in which assets are seized within CITY by personnel assigned to CITY pursuant to this Agreement, without the involvement of other law enforcement personnel, and in which the seizure is a result solely of activities self-initiated by SHERIFF personnel assigned to CITY or initiated by said personnel in response to calls for service within CITY, SHERIFF shall apply to have all of the assets used to augment CITY law enforcement services.
I
n those cases in which SHERIFF personnel assigned to CITY pursuant to this Agreement play an ancillary role in a seizure or in which other law enforcement personnel are involved in a seizure, SHERIFF shall determine the percentage of the total forfeited assets for which he will apply to augment CITY’s law enforcement services. This determination will be based on the circumstances of the seizure, including the pro -rata involvement of all personnel, including those assigned to CITY.
E
ach seizure will be evaluated on an individual and independent basis, and said evaluations will be available for review to CITY’s manager. Examples of those incidents which would be evaluated as set forth in this section include situations in which a contract patrol deputy provides uniformed backup at a SHERIFF’s Narcotic Bureau search warrant location or in which contract investigators participate in the service of a search warrant that was initiated by non-contract law enforcement personnel.
A
ssets (cash or property) that are returned to SHERIFF by the forfeiting agency with the understanding that they will be used to augment CITY law enforcement services shall be used by CITY and SHERIFF only for such purposes. If the forfeiting agency attaches additional or more specific conditions to the use of said assets, CITY and SHERIFF shall also abide by those conditions. SHERIFF and CITY’s manager shall determine the specific use of said assets within the conditions imposed by the forfeiting agency. 268
RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 04
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO
VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ORANGE COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT TO COLLECT ITS UPDATED FEE FOR THE
TRAFFIC VIOLATOR APPREHENSION PROGRAM IN THE CITY OF
ALISO VIEJO
WHEREAS, the Orange County Sheriff- Coroner (“ the Sheriff”) has instituted a Traffic Violator Apprehension Program designed to reduce vehicle accidents caused by unlicensed drivers and drivers whose licenses are suspended and to educate the public about the requirements of the Vehicle Code and related safety issues with regard to driver licensing, vehicle registration, vehicle operation, and parking; and WHEREAS, the Sheriff operates the Traffic Violator Apprehension Program in the unincorporated areas of Orange County and in cities ( such as the City of Aliso Viejo) that contract for the Sheriff’s law enforcement services; and WHEREAS, operating the Traffic Violator Apprehension Program on an area- wide basis without regard to jurisdictional boundaries between the County and contract cities serves the public purpose of the City because drivers routinely cross jurisdictional boundaries, making an area- wide approach to reduction of traffic accidents and driver education most effective in preventing traffic accidents in all participating jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, on March 28, 2000, the Orange County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 00- 96, which established fees for the Traffic Violator Apprehension Program that are applicable in unincorporated areas of the County. The fees established by County Resolution No. 00-96 address the Sheriff’s administrative costs relating to the removal, impound, storage, or release of properly impounded vehicles; and WHEREAS, on August 7, 2001, the Aliso Viejo City Council adopted Resolution No. 2001- 046, which authorized the Sheriff to collect fees in the City in connection with the Traffic Violator Apprehension Program in amounts identical to the County’s fees as set forth in County Resolution No. 00-96; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has established an interest- earning, budgeted special revenue fund, called the “Traffic Violator Fund” and designated as Fund 13B, to be controlled by the Sheriff; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has directed that proceeds from the Traffic Violator Apprehension Program fees be deposited into the Traffic Violator Fund; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has directed that funds from the Traffic Violator Fund must be used to reimburse the Sheriff for the administrative costs associated with the removal, storage, impound, and release of vehicles in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (“Vehicle Code”); and
ATTACHMENT F
269
WHEREAS, the Sheriff impounds vehicles removed from highways, public property, and private property in the unincorporated areas of the County and in contract cities pursuant to the following authority under the Vehicle Code:
Vehicle Code Section and Impound Ground
14602. 6 Suspended, revoked or unlicensed driver/ 30-day hold 22651 ( a) Unattended vehicle on bridge
22651 ( d) Vehicle blocking driveway
22651 ( e) Vehicle blocking fire hydrant
22651 ( f) Vehicle blocking freeway
22651 ( h) (1) Driver arrested
22651 ( h) (2) Order of suspension or revocation pursuant to section 13388 22651 ( i) (1) Multiple parking citations
22651 ( j) Lack of vehicle registration
22651 ( k) Parking over seventy- two hours
22651 ( l) Parking in a construction zone
22651 ( m) Violation of special events restriction
22651 ( n) No parking zone
22651 ( o) (1) Vehicle registration is incorrect, falsified or expired by more than six months
22651 ( p) Driver unlicensed or license suspended
22651 ( r) Vehicle blocking another vehicle
22651 ( t) Notice to appear/ illegal amber lights
22651 ( u) Acting as a car dealer without a license or temporary permit 22651 ( v) Illegally letting stand a mobile billboard advertisement 22651 ( w) Second or subsequent violation of an ordinance 22655. 3 Removal for investigation ( fleeing in violation of section 2800. 1 or 2800. 2)
270
22655. 5 ( a) Vehicle was used as the means of committing a public offense 22655. 5 ( b) Vehicle is evidence of crime
22669 Abandoned vehicle
WHEREAS, Vehicle Code section 22850. 5 authorizes the City Council, by resolution, to establish a fee equal to the administrative costs relating to the removal, impound, storage, or release of properly impounded vehicles; and
WHEREAS, approximately 20 years have passed since the Board of Supervisors first established the Traffic Violator Apprehension Program fees in County Resolution No. 00- 96; and
WHEREAS, a cost study prepared in 2020 by the Sheriff demonstrated a need to update the County’s Traffic Violator Apprehension Program fees. The Sheriff’s cost study determined that the Sheriff’s administrative costs relating to the removal, impound, storage, or release of vehicles properly impounded under the Vehicle Code is $ 144. 00 per removal; and
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2020, the Board of Supervisors adopted an updated Traffic Violator Apprehension Program fee of $ 144. 00 per removal; and WHEREAS, consistent with the City’s authority under Vehicle Code section 22850. 5, the Sheriff has requested that the City update its Traffic Violator Apprehension fees to match the County’s new fee of $ 144. 00 per removal;
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the Traffic Violator Apprehension Program fee to match the County and further desires for the Sheriff to continue to collect the fee on behalf of the City. Continuing with such a practice will ensure that persons whose vehicles are impounded, rather than the public as a whole, will bear the administrative costs of such impounds; and
WHEREAS, Vehicle Code section 22850. 5 imposed the following restrictions on the imposition of this administrative fee:
a) The fee may only be imposed on the registered owner or the agents of that owner and may not include any vehicle towed under an abatement program or sold at a lien sale pursuant to Sections 3068. 1 to 3074, inclusive, of, and Section 22851 of, the Civil Code unless the sale is sufficient in amount to pay the lienholder’s total charges and proper administrative costs; and b) Any charges shall be collected by the local or state authority only from the registered owner or an agent of the registered owner; and c) The charges shall be in addition to any other charges authorized or imposed pursuant to this code; and
271
d) The fee does not include any administrative costs associated with conducting a hearing or appeal relating to the removal, impound, storage, or release of a vehicle; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the limitations set forth above, it is also unfair to impose the administrative fee authorized by Vehicle Code section 22850. 5 in the following circumstances: 1) when the vehicle was left because it became inoperable while being drive, if the owner makes good faith attempts promptly to remove the vehicle from location where it is not permitted, 2) when the vehicle was stolen, 3) when the vehicle was left by an ill or injured driver, and 4) when it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Sheriff or his/her designee that neither the registered owner of the vehicle nor his/ her agent, if any, was at fault in creating the circumstances leading to the impounding of the vehicle; and WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing with respect to the proposed new Traffic Violator Apprehension Program fee provided herein was given according to law; and WHEREAS, a public hearing pertaining to the new Traffic Violator Apprehension Program fee was held on January 7, 2021; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The recitals above are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings, as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2. The City Council finds that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“ CEQA”) and the CEQA Guidelines, the adoption of this Resolution is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080 b)(8) and Sections 15061( b)(3) and 15273( a)(1) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations because CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Here, this Resolution does not undertake any project that has the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment as the Resolution simply authorizes the Orange County Sheriff’s Department to collect its updated operating cost- recovery fee for the removal, impoundment, and storage of vehicles for specified Vehicle Code violations.
SECTION 3. That on January 20, 2021, the administrative fee indicated below shall become effective for the removal, impound, storage, or release of vehicles properly impounded after removal from locations in the City in accordance with or on account of provisions of the Vehicle Code listed below:
A fee of $ 144. 00 for each removal of a vehicle in accordance with or on account of violation of Vehicle Code sections:
14602. 6 Suspended, revoked or unlicensed driver/ 30-day hold 272
22651 ( a) Unattended vehicle on bridge
22651 ( d) Vehicle blocking driveway
22651 ( e) Vehicle blocking fire hydrant
22651 ( f) Vehicle blocking freeway
22651 ( h) (1) Driver arrested
22651 ( h) (2) Order of suspension or revocation pursuant to section 13388 22651 ( i) (1) Multiple parking citations
22651 ( j) Lack of vehicle registration
22651 ( k) Parking over seventy- two hours
22651 ( l) Parking in a construction zone
22651 ( m) Violation of special events restriction
22651 ( n) No parking zone
22651 ( o) (1) Vehicle registration is incorrect, falsified or expired by more than six months
22651 ( p) Driver unlicensed or license suspended
22651 ( r) Vehicle blocking another vehicle
22651 ( t) Notice to appear/ illegal amber lights
22651 ( u) Acting as a car dealer without a license or temporary permit 22651 ( v) Illegally letting stand a mobile billboard advertisement 22651 ( w) Second or subsequent violation of an ordinance 22655. 3 Removal for investigation ( fleeing in violation of section 2800. 1 or 2800. 2)
22655. 5 ( a) Vehicle was used as the means of committing a public offense 22655. 5 ( b) Vehicle is evidence of crime
22669 Abandoned vehicle
273
SECTION 4. The Sheriff is authorized to collect the fee established herein, on behalf of the City, at the time of release of vehicles that are subject to the fee.
SECTION 5. The fee established herein shall only be imposed on the registered owner or the agent of the owner of the impounded vehicle, shall not include any vehicle towed under an abatement program or sold at a lien sale pursuant to Sections 3068. 1 to 3074, inclusive of, and Section 22851 of, the Civil Code unless the sale is sufficient in amount to pay the lienholder’s total charges and proper administrative costs.
SECTION 6. The fee established herein shall be collected only from the registered owner or an agent of the registered owner and that said fee is in addition to any other charges authorized or imposed pursuant to the Vehicle Code.
SECTION 7. The fee established herein complies with Vehicle Code section 22850. 5 ( b)(4) as the cost study conducted by the Sheriff that supports the $ 144. 00 per removal fee did not include administrative costs for conducting a hearing or appeal related to the removal, impound, storage, or release of a vehicle.
SECTION 8. The Sheriff shall not impose the fee established herein in any of the following circumstances: ( a) when the vehicle was left because it became inoperable while being driven, if the owner made good faith attempts promptly to remove the vehicle from a location where it was not permitted: ( b) when the vehicle was stolen; ( c) when the vehicle was left by an ill or injured drive; or (d) when it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Sheriff or his/ her designee that neither the registered owner of the vehicle nor his/her agent, if any, was at fault in creating the circumstances leading to the impounding of the vehicle.
SECTION 9. A registered owner or an agent of a registered owner who believes he/she/ they are exempt from the fee established herein under any of the criteria listed in Section 8 above may apply in writing for a waiver of the fee and shall present such supporting information or documentation, as the Sheriff may request, to the City’s Administrative Sergeant. Upon the presentation of a written application for waiver of said fee, together with such supporting documentation as may be requested by the Sheriff, the Administrative Sergeant or his/ her designee shall determine promptly whether the applicant meets the criteria for a waiver of the fee and if so, shall waive the fee.
SECTION 10. Until further order of the City Council, the Sheriff is directed to deposit the proceeds of the fee established herein into Traffic Violator Fund in the County Treasury. Proceeds from the Traffic Violator Fund shall be used in conformance with the County’s restrictions for the same as well as in conformance with any applicable provisions set forth in the City’s agreement with the County for the Sheriff’s law enforcement services.
SECTION 11. Until further order of the City Council, the Board of Supervisors is authorized to carry forward in the Traffic Violator Fund and accumulate any balance of proceeds of fees imposed by this Resolution that remains at the end of a fiscal year, as long as such fee proceeds will be used for the purposes provided herein. 274
SECTION 12. This Resolution supersedes Resolution No. 2001- 046.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of January, 2021.
Tiffany Ackley
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Scott C. Smith Mitzi Ortiz, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk
Mitzi OrOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOtiz,MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMCMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMCCCCMCMMMMMMMMCMMMMMMMCCCMMMMMMMMMMMCMCMMMMMMMMMMMMCMCMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM City Clerk
275
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO )
I, MITZI ORTIZ, City Clerk of the City of Aliso Viejo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2021- 04 duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo at their regular meeting held on the 20th day of January, 2021, by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Mayor Ackley, Mayor Pro Tem Chun, Councilmembers Harrington, Hurt, and Munzing
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
MITZI ORTIZ, MMC
CITY CLERK
SEAL)
MITZI OROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTIZ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMC
CITY CLERK
276
OCSD
BUDGET
USE ONLY
R E Q U E S T
C ER TI F I C A T IO N
A P P R O V A L S
ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF-CORONER
TRAFFIC VIOLATOR APPREHENSION PROGRAM
CONTRACT CITY
Participating City Request to Purchase From the TVA in FY Date
APPLICABILTY
QUANTITY ITEM DESCRIPTION TO TVA PROGRAM ESTIMATED COST
THE CITY CERTIFIES THAT THE EQUIPMENT PURCHASED BY CITY AND TO BE REIMBURSED BY PROGRAM FUNDS
WILL BE USED FOR ITS ENTIRE USEFUL LIFE EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE TRAFFIC VIOLATOR
APPREHENSION PROGRAM
CITY MANAGER REQUEST:
Printed Name
Signature: DATE
Recommended For Approval
CITY POLICE SERVICES CHIEF MANAGER – TVA PROGRAM
ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF-CORONER DEPARTMENT
ATTACHMENT G
277
Share: Four (4) Sergeants with LH, LW ( 1/3 AV, 1/3 LH, 1/3 LW) One (1) Deputy Sheriff II - School Resources Officer (SRO) with LN (0.35) One (1) Investigator Position with LW (0.50)
Add:
Transition: Patrol Video Cameras (PVS) to In Car Video (ICV)
DIRECT PURCHASE SERVICES & COUNTY
NO POSITIONS SALARY OVERTIME BENEFITS POST PAY SUPPLIES TRANSP. DEPT. OH DIV. OH TRAINING OH OTHER REVENUE TOTAL 1 Captain 203,609 0 192,068 0 6,357 0 8,381 24,035 4,502 4,072 0 0 443,024 1 Sergeant - Administrative 154,157 0 151,242 15,136 6,357 0 8,381 27,247 4,502 3,386 0 0 370,408
1.33 Sergeant - Patrol (Share with LW) 205,029 0 201,152 20,131 8,454 0 11,147 36,239 5,988 4,503 0 0 492,643
1.5 Investigator (Share w/LW) 203,454 0 202,462 18,663 9,536 0 12,572 90,569 6,753 4,443 0 0 548,452 15 DS II Patrol 1,864,170 0 1,853,760 129,285 95,355 0 125,715 437,490 67,530 39,870 0 0 4,613,175
0.65 DS II School Resource Officer (Share with LN) 80,781 0 80,330 5,602 4,132 0 5,448 18,958 2,926 1,728 0 0 199,905 2 DS II Motorcycle 254,556 0 251,072 17,238 12,714 0 16,762 58,332 9,004 5,436 0 0 625,114
22.48 Subtotal Safety $2,965,756 $0 $2,932,086 $206,055 $142,905 $0 $188,406 $692,870 $101,205 $63,438 $0 $0 $7,292,721 2 Community Services Officer 119,016 0 85,402 0 12,714 0 16,762 54,494 0 2,380 0 0 290,768 1 Sr. Emergency Mgt. Prog. Coord. (full position) 112,731 0 64,330 0 6,357 0 8,381 2,034 0 2,255 0 0 196,088
3.00 Subtotal Professional $231,747 $0 $149,732 $0 $19,071 $0 $25,143 $56,528 $0 $4,635 $0 $0 $486,856
25.48 TOTAL STAFF $3,197,503 $0 $3,081,818 $206,055 $161,976 $0 $213,549 $749,398 $101,205 $68,073 $0 $0 $7,779,577
REGIONAL / SHARED STAFF
0.6 Traffic - Sergeant 5.36% 7,032 883 5,904 486 244 215 269 489 145 168 0 0 15,835 4 Traffic - Deputy Sheriff II 5.36% 31,593 7,394 28,551 1,846 1,629 3,627 1,795 3,261 964 817 0 0 81,477 2 Traffic - Investigative Assistant 5.36% 7,469 3 6,110 0 801 0 898 1,270 0 149 0 0 16,700 1 Traffic - Office Specialist 5.36% 2,968 85 1,902 0 401 0 449 635 0 61 0 0 6,501
0.3 Auto Theft - Sergeant 4.99% 3,273 411 2,748 226 97 100 125 227 67 78 0 0 7,352 2 Auto Theft - Investigator 4.99% 14,461 1,240 13,347 1,240 646 452 836 1,515 449 339 0 0 34,525 1 Auto Theft - Investigative Assistant 4.99% 3,445 104 2,852 0 317 0 418 590 0 71 0 0 7,797 1 Auto Theft - Office Specialist 4.99% 2,710 0 1,748 0 317 0 418 590 0 54 0 0 5,837 1 DET Sergeant 11.98% 19,734 3,903 18,092 1,814 680 0 1,004 5,722 539 496 0 0 51,984 1 DET Investigator 11.98% 17,187 4,958 16,147 1,491 680 0 1,004 5,722 539 461 0 0 48,189 2 Courts - Investigative Assistant 9.80% 13,774 1,720 11,535 0 1,246 108 1,642 399 0 310 0 0 30,734 1 Motorcycle Sergeant + MDC 8.16% 13,308 12 12,367 1,236 649 1,421 684 1,243 368 298 350 0 31,936
16.90 Subtotal $136,954 $20,713 $121,303 $8,339 $7,707 $5,923 $9,542 $21,663 $3,071 $3,302 $350 $0 $338,867
SALARIES & EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INDIRECT COSTS
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
FINAL Body Worn Cameras (BWC)
Updated 5/2/2022
Aliso Viejo FY 2022-23 Spreadsheets/FY 22-23 (final) Page 1 of 2 278
Share: Four (4) Sergeants with LH, LW ( 1/3 AV, 1/3 LH, 1/3 LW) One (1) Deputy Sheriff II - School Resources Officer (SRO) with LN (0.35) One (1) Investigator Position with LW (0.50)
Add:
Transition: Patrol Video Cameras (PVS) to In Car Video (ICV)
SALARIES & EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INDIRECT COSTS
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
FINAL Body Worn Cameras (BWC)
Updated 5/2/2022
ADDITIONAL SERVICES & COUNTY
NO COSTS/REVENUE SALARY OVERTIME BENEFITS POST PAY SUPPLIES TRANSP. DEPT. OH DIV. OH TRAINING OH OTHER REVENUE TOTAL Overtime 931,153 64,488 18,623 1,014,264
Estimate: Vacancy Credit (200,000) (200,000)
Annual Leave (Pay Downs & Termination Pay) 100,157 100,157 AB109 (2011 Public Safety Realignment) (9,600) (9,600)
Body Worn Cameras (BWC) and In Car Video (ICV) Costs 260,836 260,836 Contract Administration 28,458 28,458
Data Line 1,522 1,522
2 E - Citation 4,599 4,599
Enhanced Helicopter Response Services 21,060 21,060
Facility Lease 49,178 49,178
Holiday Pay: Comp & Straight Time 127,812 127,812
Integrated Law & Justice Agency of Orange County 2,734 2,734 Mobile Data Computers (MDC) - Acquisition 0
18.33 Mobile Data Computers (MDC) - Recurring Costs 67,129 67,129 Patrol Training Cost Allocation (FTB) 111,237 111,237
Premium Pay 85,149 85,149
Retirement Rate Discount (Expenses for Interest and Issuance) 6,159 6,159 Retirement Rate Discount, (Gross) (122,794) (122,794)
Revenue/False Alarms (8,260) (8,260)
Revenue/Training Reimbursement 0
Revenue/Restitution Reimbursement (2,410) (2,410)
Services & Supplies 37,333 37,333
Transportation - Vehicle Fuel, Maintenance, Mileage Interest etc. 224,074 224,074 Subtotal $0 $931,153 ($52,146) $0 $88,033 $245,134 $0 $0 $111,237 $18,623 $476,874 ($20,270) $1,798,638 FY 2022-23 - FINAL CONTRACT TOTAL $3,334,457 $951,866 $3,150,975 $214,394 $257,716 $251,057 $223,091 $771,061 $215,513 $89,998 $477,224 ($20,270) $9,917,082 FY 2021-22 - FINAL CONTRACT TOTAL $3,210,329 $917,979 $3,162,187 $200,618 $242,987 $268,537 $209,567 $778,323 $216,880 $84,808 $229,079 ($16,924) $9,504,370
3.87% 3.69% -0.35% 6.87% 6.06% -6.51% 6.45% -0.93% -0.63% 6.12% 108.32% 19.77% 4.34% $124,128 $33,887 ($11,212) $13,776 $14,729 ($17,480) $13,524 ($7,262) ($1,367) $5,190 $248,145 ($3,346) $412,712 Aliso Viejo FY 2022-23 Spreadsheets/FY 22-23 (final) Page 2 of 2 279
City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: June 15, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Rose Rivera, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION PA21-027 (CUP)
FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH AN AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR FACILITY (TESLA COLLISION CENTER) AT 41 COLUMBIA Recommended Actions:
1. Open and conduct a public hearing;
2. Find that the request is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities); and
3. Adopt a Resolution (Attachment 1) approving Planning Application PA21-027 (CUP) for a conditional use permit to establish an automotive repair facility at 41 Columbia.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact to the City associated with this discretionary action.
Background:
On November 6, 2021, the Applicant, Bill Hofman, of Hofman Planning Associates on behalf of Tesla Motors Inc., submitted an application for a conditional use permit to establish an automotive repair facility within an existing 30,737 square foot building located at 41 Columbia. The industrial building was formerly occupied by a television studio operated by Benny Hinn Ministries but has been vacant for several years.
Property Information
Existing Site Address 41 Columbia
Assessor’s Parcel Number 623-141-09
Applicant/Agent Bill Hofman, Hofman Planning Associates for Tesla Motors, Inc.
Property Owner Cal-Tex Acquisition IV, LLC
General Plan Designation Business Park (BP)
Zoning District Business Park-2 (BP-2)
Existing Site Size 2 acres
Existing Conditions Light Industrial Building
280
Adjacent Land Uses Zoning
North NeoGenomics Laboratories Business Park-2 (BP-2)
South 73 Toll Road N/A
East NeoGenomics Laboratories Business Park-2 (BP-2)
West UPS Fulfillment Center Business Park-2 (BP-2)
Discussion:
Tesla Motors, Inc. is proposing to occupy an existing 30,737 square foot building located at 41 Columbia for an auto repair facility. Aliso Viejo Municipal Code (AVMC) Section
15.18.020 states that “auto repair service, major” uses are permitted in the Business Park 2 (BP-2) zoning district with an approved conditional use permit.
Business Operations
The proposed project consists of converting the existing building into an automotive collision repair center for Tesla vehicles. The operation includes: the assessment of vehicle damage; and repair or replacement of body panels, paint, glass, and mechanical and trim components. The anticipated hours of operation will be Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 12 a.m. All repair activity will be conducted within the facility. Work in progress (WIP) cars will remain inside the building. The service shop consists of a 21,437 square foot area containing a total of 10 vehicle lifts, eight (8) open service bays, an alignment rack, prep booth, spray booth, and two (2) wash bays. Vehicles will be taken in through the roll-up doors located on the rear of the building and cleaned at the wash bay.
From there, cars will be moved to assigned lifts for repairs. Repairs will typically involve disassembly, painting and vehicle reassembly. Replacement parts will be delivered to the loading dock and moved to the parts and storage area via forklift.
Customers who go to the facility will primarily be by appointment only. Customers will drive their car in or have a tow provider take their car to the facility on the day of their appointment. Tesla will have staff members who will review the damaged vehicle with the customer, and customers will wait in the lounge area while staff prepares the estimate in the office. Tesla does not offer loaner vehicles or shuttle service; however, customers will be offered ride share vouchers (e.g., Uber, Lyft, etc.) to get to their next destination.
Site Improvements
The Applicant is proposing parking lot striping modifications which have been designed in compliance with Chapter 15.38 of the zoning code requirements which requires that all parking stalls are a minimum of nine (9) feet wide by 18 feet long, and the drive aisles are maintained at a minimum of 24 feet. The parking lot currently has 88 parking spaces, and with the striping modifications, is proposed to have 89 parking spaces. Of the 89 parking spaces, five (5) will be ADA accessible. Tesla chargers will be installed at five (5) of the parking spaces located directly adjacent to the rear of the building. Below is a summary of the parking for the Project.
281
Use AVMC Parking Requirement Parking Required
Automotive Repair Services,
excluding storage
(28,237 s.f.)
1 space per 400 s.f. 71
Storage
(2,410 s.f.) 1 space per 1,000 s.f. 2
Total Number of Spaces Required 73
Number of Onsite Parking Spaces 89
AVMC Section 15.38.040 requires a total of 73 parking spaces for automotive repair services and the project proposes 89 spaces. Therefore, sufficient onsite parking will be provided.
To secure the parking lot, the Applicant is proposing a sliding gate along the drive aisle facing Columbia. Per AVMC Section 15.18.020, storage areas (including vehicle storage) shall be visually screened from adjacent streets with an opaque fence or plant screen.
The Applicant is proposing a six-foot tall decorative iron gate with perforated metal screening to block the view of the parking area from Columbia. Since the parking area is set back approximately 100’ from Columbia, the perforated material will visually obscure the parking area. The vehicles will be parked in the rear of the building and with the addition of the decorative gate, the vehicles will not be visible from Columbia.
Four (4) new HVAC units and ventilating units are proposed to be installed on the roof of the building. Pursuant to AVMC Section 15.62.080.E.2.a, roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from a horizontal line of sight. The intent of the code requirement is to ensure that mechanical equipment cannot be viewed at a 90-degree angle from nearby properties given the City’s hilly topography. After extensive discussion with City staff, the Applicant provided an analysis to show that screening is only warranted on the south elevation of the building which faces the 73 Toll Road. Because the building is located at the highest point of Columbia, there is no public viewpoint from a 90’ angle that could see the roof from the north or east of the building. Additionally, there is an existing parapet along the east side of the building that would screen the new equipment from Columbia. The west elevation (UPS facility) is elevated approximately 50’ higher than the subject site and is surrounded by a six-foot high block wall which obscures the view of the subject site. Along the southern property line, there is potential for those driving along the 73 Toll Road and from the offices across the highway and therefore screening will be provided to conceal the proposed roof top units. The screen will be constructed to match in color and materials of the existing building.
Environmental:
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the project is considered Categorically Exempt Class 1 – Existing Facilities (CEQA Section 15301) as it consists of activities involving operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, minor alteration of, or legislative activities to regulate, existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment or other property, or topographical features, 282
provided the activity involves negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the City’s determination.
Public Notice:
On June 2, 2022, a public hearing notice was published in the Laguna Niguel News and mailed to all owners of real properties and tenants within 300 feet of the subject real property.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Project Description Letter
3. Project Plans
4. Presentation
283
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO
VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION PA21- 027 (CUP) FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH AN
AUTO REPAIR FACILITY AT 41 COLUMBIA
WHEREAS, on November 9, 2021, the Applicant, Bill Hofman of Hofman Planning Associates on behalf of Tesla Motors, Inc., submitted Planning Application PA21-027 (CUP) for a conditional use permit to establish an auto repair facility at 41 Columbia (Project); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Aliso Viejo Municipal Code (“AVMC”) Section 15.18.020, auto repair services, major, require conditional use permit (“CUP”) approval within the Business Park 2 (BP-2) Zoning District; and
WHEREAS, a CUP is required for all land uses identified in the AVMC as requiring such permits, pursuant to AVMC Section 15.74.040.B; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 15367, the City of Aliso Viejo (“City”) is Lead Agency for purposes of the Project; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the proposed Project and has determined that it is Categorically Exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities); and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that none of the Exceptions to the Categorical Exemptions outlined in Title 14, California Code of Regulations Section 15300.2 applies to the Project; and
WHEREAS, the foregoing exemptions are sufficient to independently exempt the whole of the action from CEQA; and
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law and considered public testimony and evidence and recommendations presented by staff in the agenda report and oral presentation related to Planning Application PA21-027 (CUP); and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
284
SECTION 1. Determination of Recitals. The City Council hereby finds and determines that all of the recitals set forth above are true and correct. The above recitals are hereby incorporated as substantive findings of this Resolution.
SECTION 2. Compliance with CEQA. The City Council finds the proposed project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to a Class 1 exemption for activities involving operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, minor alteration of, or legislative activities to regulate, existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment or other property, or topographical features, provided the activity involves negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the City’s determination. (State CEQA Guidelines, section 15301.) The exemption identified under Class 1 includes interior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances. The proposed project qualifies for a Class 1 exemption because the project consists of the establishment of an automotive repair facility within an existing building. Tenant improvements associated with the project involve minor modifications to the interior and exterior of the existing building.
No additional improvements beyond the existing parking lots are needed. Therefore, the proposed project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, section 15301.
To the extent the Class 1 categorical exemption applies to the proposed project, staff has determined that none of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions apply (14 C.C.R. §15300.2.). Specifically, the proposed project is not located in a particularly sensitive environment. Improvements will be installed on existing structures in urbanized/developed areas. The cumulative impact of successive projects of this same type in the same place over time would not be significant because these types of conversions are limited in size and number. The existing building is not located within an officially designated state scenic highway. Thus, the proposed project would not have an impact in this regard. Similarly, the building is not located on a site designated pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5 (Cal/EPA Hazardous Waste and Substances Site Lists). Finally, the proposed project does not involve any improvements, modifications, or other changes to a historical resource. Therefore, none of the circumstances outlined in Title 14, California Code of Regulations, section 15300.2 applies. Thus, the categorical exemption outlined above remains applicable to the proposed project.
SECTION 3. Approval of Project and Findings for Conditional Use Permit for an auto repair facility. In accordance with Section 15.74.040 (C) of the AVMC, the City Council hereby approves the CUP for Planning Application PA21-027 (CUP) subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
The City Council, sitting as the legislative body and based upon the entire record, including all written and oral evidence presented, finds that:
1. Consistency with General Plan. The land use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan:
285
The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation of Business Park (BP), which allows for a range of uses including light industrial uses with supporting services. Additionally, Goal LU-1 states the City shall “provide a diverse mix of land uses to meet the future needs of all residents and the business community.” The proposed Project will help meet the auto repair needs of the surrounding business park users and residents. The proposed project will create revenue-generating land use consistent with Policy LU-3.1, produce new job opportunities consistent with Policy LU-3.2, reduce pollutants from urban development pursuant to Policy LU-4.4, and comply with all federal and state environmental guidelines consistent with Policy LU-4.5. The Project will comply with these relevant General Plan Goals and further enhances the diverse mix of land uses within Aliso Viejo.
2. Consistency with Zoning Code. The land use and associated development conform to the permitted use provisions and development standards of the Zoning Code and is consistent with the Code and any applicable specific plan:
The Project is located within the Business Park 2 (BP-2) Zoning District. “Auto repair services, major” are permitted within the BP-2 district with an approved conditional use permit. The Project complies with development standards of the BP-2 zone in regard to building height, parking, setbacks, screening, etc. and will not change the footprint of the existing building. The Project as proposed, with approval of the conditional use permit, would be consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code.
3. Compliance with CEQA. Processing and approval of the permit application are in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
The proposed project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to a Class 1 exemption for activities involving operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, minor alteration of, or legislative activities to regulate, existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment or other property, or topographical features, provided the activity involves negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the City’s determination. (State CEQA Guidelines, section 15301.) The exemption identified under Class 1 includes interior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances. The proposed project qualifies for a Class 1 exemption because the project consists of establishment of an auto repair facility within an existing building. Tenant improvements associated with the project involve minor modification to the interior and exterior of the existing building. No additional improvements beyond the existing parking lots are needed. Therefore, the proposed project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, section 15301.
To the extent the Class 1 categorical exemption applies to the proposed project, staff has determined that none of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions 286
apply. (14 C.C.R. §15300.2.) Specifically, the proposed project is not located in a particularly sensitive environment. Improvements will be installed on existing structures in urbanized/developed areas. The cumulative impact of successive projects of this same type in the same place over time would not be significant because these types of conversions are limited in size and number. The existing building is not located within an officially designated state scenic highway. Thus, the proposed project would not have an impact in this regard. Similarly, the building is not located on a site designated pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5 (Cal/EPA Hazardous Waste and Substances Site Lists). Finally, the proposed project does not involve any improvements, modifications, or other changes to a historical resource. Therefore, none of the circumstances outlined in Title 14, California Code of Regulations, section 15300.2 applies. Thus, the categorical exemption outlined above remains applicable to the proposed project.
4. Surrounding Uses. Approval of the application will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare, or injurious to or incompatible with other properties or land uses in the vicinity in that:
The site is located within an area primarily characterized by light industrial, office and manufacturing uses. The site is bound by Columbia to the north, and the 73 Toll Road to the south. The neighboring structures are industrial uses including NeoGenomics laboratory (31 and 51 Columbia) to the north and east, UPS customer fulfillment center (22 Brookline) to the west. Because Tesla’s work in progress vehicles will be kept within the building, from the outside view, the use will not look any different than the surrounding structures. There is no indication the use will create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of persons residing or working in or adjacent to the site. There is no indication the use will create conditions materially detrimental or injurious to the properties, improvements or land uses in the vicinity.
SECTION 4. Filing of Notice of Exemption. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs staff to prepare, execute and file with the Orange County Clerk a Notice of Exemption for the proposed Project.
SECTION 5. Location of Documents. The administrative record for the Project is maintained at City Hall located at 12 Journey, Suite 100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656. The custodian of records is the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of June 2022. _____________________________
Ross Chun
Mayor
287
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________ _____________________________ Scott C. Smith Mitzi Ortiz, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk
288
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO )
I, MITZI ORTIZ, City Clerk of the City of Aliso Viejo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2022-___ was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo at their regular meeting held on the 15th day of June 2022, by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
___________________________
MITZI ORTIZ
CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
289
EXHIBIT “A”
PLANNING APPLICATION PA21-027 (CUP)
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Project Description. Approval of the Planning Application PA21-027 (CUP) is for a conditional use permit to establish an automotive repair facility at 41 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA in accordance with all plans and exhibits as presented to and approved by the City Council on June 15, 2022.
2. Period of Validity. The period of validity for Planning Application PA21-027 (CUP) shall run indefinitely, unless the use is not established within two years of the permit’s effective date set out above pursuant to AVMC Section 15.74.090(B).
3. Development Per Approved Plans. This approval constitutes a precise plan for location and design of uses, structures, features and materials submitted with this application. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the plans and description letter approved for this Project and on file in with the Community Development Department, subject to any modifications imposed by the conditions of approval herein, as confirmed by the Community Development Director. Any land use, construction or improvement not specifically approved by this use permit is not permitted and must be addressed in a separate and subsequent application and review. Relocation, alteration or addition to any use, structure, feature or material not specifically approved shall require an amendment to the approved plans unless the Community Development Director determines such modifications are minor and consistent with the spirit and intent of the original approving action, and that the action would have been the same for the modifications as for the approved plans. The Community Development Director may approve such minor modifications in accordance with AVMC Section 15.74.110.
4. Applicant Designation. For the purpose of Planning Application PA21-027 (CUP) and as referenced in the conditions, “Applicant” shall apply to Hofman Planning Associates on behalf of Tesla Motors, Inc., owner, operator, and future successors of the approved establishment.
5. Payment of Fees. The Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all applicable fees along with reimbursement for all City expenses in ensuring compliance with conditions. All fees and expenses shall be paid in full prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Prior to issuance of applicable City approvals or permits, the applicant shall be fully responsible for reimbursing the City of Aliso Viejo for all expenses incurred to process the application and assure compliance with all conditions of approval.
6. Compliance with Conditions. The Applicant shall be fully responsible for knowing and complying with all conditions of approval, including making conditions known to City staff for future governmental permits or actions on the project site. Failure to abide by and faithfully comply with any and all conditions attached to the granting of these 290
permits may constitute grounds for revocation of the permit(s) in accordance with AVMC Section 15.74.120.
7. Indemnification. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold the City, and/or any of its officials (appointed or elected), officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, conditional or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively 'Actions'), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Community Redevelopment Law, Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state, or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action.
8. Compliance with Building Codes. Tenant improvements shall be submitted for review, approved and permits issued, and shall comply with standards, regulations and requirements of current editions of the California Building Code, California Plumbing Code and California Mechanical Code, California Electrical Code, including any local amendments adopted by the City of Aliso Viejo.
9. Building Plans. The Applicant shall submit plans to the Building Department reflecting the change in floor plan uses. The Resolution, as approved by City Council shall be printed within the updated plan set.
10.Conditions of Approval. Prior to the issuance of necessary building permits, the Applicant shall list all conditions of approval on the title sheet.
11.Orange County Fire Authority. Prior to the issuance of necessary building permits, the Applicant or responsible party shall submit the plan(s) listed below to the Orange County Fire Authority for review. Approval shall be obtained on each plan prior to the event specified.
a. Prior to issuance of a building permit:
291
i. Spray Booth (Service code PR345)
ii. Hazardous Material Process/Storage (Service Code PR315) iii. Chemical Classification (Service Codes PR318-PR328) b. Prior to concealing interior construction:
i. Fire Alarm System (Service Code PR500-PR520), if modified, provided voluntarily, or required by code.
ii. Fire Sprinkler System (Service Codes PR400-PR465), if modified, provided voluntarily, or required by code.
12.Temporary/Final Occupancy Inspections: Prior to issuance of temporary or final certificate of occupancy, all OCFA inspections shall be completed to the satisfaction of the OCFA inspector and be in substantial compliance with codes and standards applicable to the project and commensurate with the type of occupancy (temporary or final) requested. Inspections shall be scheduled at least five days in advance by calling OCFA Inspection Scheduling at 714-573-6150.
13.State and Federal Permits. All necessary State and Federal permits, including the South Coast Air Quality Management District permit, shall be obtained prior to operations.
14.Signs. All signs proposed for this development shall be designed in accordance with the Municipal Code and any adopted Sign Program in effect for the property and shall require review and approval of Planning Services and Building Department prior to installation.
15.Mechanical Equipment. All roof-top equipment shall be screened as shown on the approved CUP plans and exhibits to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Such screening shall be architecturally consistent with the building and an integral part of the building design.
16.Hours of Operation. The hours of operation of the auto repair facility use shall be limited to Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 12 a.m. Any request to modify hours of operation or use shall be submitted in writing to the Director for review and approval.
Furthermore, based on substantiated complaints or concerns, the Director may modify the hours of operation as deemed necessary.
17.CPTED Inspection. The project is subject to a final CPTED inspection by the Crime Prevention Specialist prior to issuance of permit of occupancy. Based on the Crime Prevention Specialist review and inspection of the Project, the Applicant shall make the required improvements and submit the necessary documentation showing compliance to the satisfaction of the Crime Prevention Specialist. 292
18.Cameras. Security cameras shall be installed per the satisfaction of the Director of Police Services. The security camera footage shall be kept for at least 30 days and available to the Orange County Sheriff Department (OCSD) within 24 hours if such usage is necessary.
19. Parking. A minimum of 73 onsite parking spaces shall be maintained at all times. If conversion of the mezzanine to another use is contemplated, a parking analysis will be required prior to conversion in order to demonstrate whether or not additional parking spaces are needed. No customer or employee parking shall be permitted on any public street.
20.Vehicle Delivery. All vehicles delivered to the premises for service shall be driven or offloaded to the interior of the building only.
21.Outdoor Storage or Repair. No outdoor storage of materials or outdoor activities including but not limited to vehicle cleaning, washing, painting, repair or material storage, shall occur outside of any building or structure.
22.Pollution Prevention Requirements. The facility shall comply with the City’s Pollution Prevention requirements (Stormwater Program Management, AVMC Chapter 7.35).
An annual water quality inspection will be conducted by City staff to verify compliance.
23.Hazardous Materials. All hazardous materials shall be stored and disposed of in compliance with Local, State and Federal regulations. The business owner and/or manager shall be required to show proof of clearance or permit from Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) and Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) for the collection and disposal of hazardous materials including used batteries.
24.Maintenance. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the entire site as a blight and nuisance-free condition at all times. This shall include but not be limited to ensuring the site is free of litter, unpermitted signage, odors, and excessive noise generated from the business operations.
25.Noise. The use shall not generate noise that exceeds ambient noise levels established in AVMC Chapter 8.12. Doors shall remain closed during hours of operation except while cars enter and exit the building. Furthermore, based on substantiated complaints or concerns, the Director may modify conditions relative to facility operations as deemed necessary.
26.Adverse Impacts. In the event of adverse impacts on the health, safety or welfare of the neighborhood or public, or receipt of substantiated complaints directly related to the Applicant’s operations, the Community Development Director shall investigate and, if significant adverse impacts directly related to the Applicant’s business are found to exist, the Director or Chief of Police shall have the discretion to bring this Permit back to the City Council for the consideration of additional improvements and 293
protective measures, additional conditions, amended conditions, or permit revocation.
Modifications may include but not be limited to the restriction of operations. 294
3500 Deer Creek Road, Palo Alto CA 94304
P 650 681 5100 F 650 681 5101
To Whom It May Concern,
Tesla Motors, Inc. is proposing to redesign and use the existing 30,737sf building located at 41 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA as an auto repair service facility as defined in the local zoning code. The property is currently zoned BP-2 (Business Park-2) which permits Auto Repair Service uses under a Conditional Use Permit.
The proposed project consists of fully remodeling the existing building into an automotive collision repair center that will address the repair of Tesla vehicles that have been involved in a collision.
The operation includes the assessment of damage and if needed, the repair or replacement of the following:
Frame
Body Panels
Glass
Paint
Mechanical and trim components to ensure the functionality and safety of the vehicle
The anticipated hours of operation will be Monda y through Friday from 8am to 12am midnight.
During this time, approximately 35-45 employees will provide repair services for approximately 60- 80 cars each week. Repairs typically take 11-16 days on average. All repair activity will be conducted within inside the facility at the serv ice area and public view will be limited. Work in progress (WIP) cars will be inside the building. Vehicles will be brought in through the roll-up doors from the rear parking area and cleaned at the wash bay. Cars will be brought to assigned lifts for repairs. Repairs will typically involve disassembly, painting and vehicle reassembly. Some repairs may involve the use of pneumatic tools, weldin g, grinding, sanding taping and spray painting.
Replacement parts will be delivered to the loading dock and moved to the parts and storage area via forklift.
Prevention protocols consistent with Tesla Environmental Health & Safety operational guidelines will be used to manage hazardous waste streams, noise, and odor generated by operations.
Hazardous waste such as paint, solvents, cont aminated solids, oil absorbents, coolant and lubricating oils will be managed to minimize adverse effects on the environment and be in compliance with the Federal Resource Conservation and Recover act (RCARA) and California State hazardous waste requirements. In addition , various fume and dust extraction devices are used in the collision repair process and contained filtrated air systems are used for paint application process. Tesla will obtain the necessary AQMD permits for their operations. Noise is mitigated by containing all repair work within the facility service area and with use of air regulators for pneumatic tooling and equipment. Battery handling and storage guidelines for 12 volt and high voltage systems are provided to all employees through Tesla’s service information website - https://service.tesla.com/. Additionally, first responder handling of battery systems is made publicly available - https://www.tesla.com/firstresponders. Any used or spent batteries will be recycled with the battery supplier.
Customers who come to the facilit y will primarily be by appointme nt only. We estimate 5 to 15 appointment customers per day. Day of customers (walk-ins) are lim ited, but we estimate 1 per Re: 41 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA
Operational Narrative for Collision Auto Repair Services 05/04/2022
295
3500 Deer Creek Road, Palo Alto CA 94304
P 650 681 5100 F 650 681 5101
day. Customers will either bring their car in or have a provider tow their car to our facility on the day of their appointment. Customers will be greeted by staff at the lobby. Staff will review the damaged vehicle with the customer. Then customers will wait in the lounge while staff prepares an estimate in the office. If there are multiple customers, esti mates will be reviewed in the conference room.
After dropping off their cars, customers are eligible for a ride share voucher (ie. Uber) to get to their next destination. When their car is complete , customers are usually dropped off by a 3 rd party or walk-in after returning a rental.
The existing parking lot will be partially fenced off for public and private uses. The private use area will be screened from public view. On a typical day, we anticipate parking use to be as follows:
Customers – 2 max at any given time
Employees – 35 (screened/private)
Vehicles Waiting for Repair Work to commence – 20 (screened/private) Repair complete vehicles waiting for customer pickup – up to 15
Thank you for your time in reviewing our project proposal. We look forward to being a part of the city of Aliso Viejo and having our services be available to its community.
Sincerely,
Carl Deaton | Director, Collision
E. [email protected]
Stephen Li | Senior Design Manager
T: 415.340.0919 E: [email protected]
296
GENERAL NOTES
41 COLUMBIA
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656
TESLA COLLISION CENTER
TENANT IMPROVEMENT
ALISO VIEJO
A0.00
COVER SHEET
AS NOTED
LOCATION MAP
PROJECT SITE
AREA MAP
INDEX OF DRAWINGS
ARCHITECTURAL
A0.00 COVER SHEET
A1.00 SITE PLAN
C1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF EXISTING SITE (BY OTHERS)
C2 PROPOSED ADA DESIGN (BY OTHERS)
A1.01A FLOOR PLAN
A1.01B MEZZANINE PLAN
A2.01 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - RENOVATION
A2.02 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS
A2.03 SECTION AND DIAGRAMS
A4.00 ROOF PLAN
FS1-1 SITE PHOTO PLAN
FS1-2 SITE PHOTOS
- DEBRIS SHALL NOT BE BURIED ON THE SUBJECT SITE. ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND
DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL TOWN, COUNTY, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS AND APPLICABLE CODES.
- ANY BROKEN OR HAZARDOUS EXISTING SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY APRONS AND CURBING
ADJACENT TO AND ON THE SUBJECT SITE SHALL BE REPLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT STANDARDS.
PROJECT DIRECTORY
ABBREVIATIONS
LAM. LAMINATE
LAV. LAVATORY
LIN. LINEAR
L.L. LANDLORD
L.P. LOW POINT
LT. LIGHT
MAX. MAXIMUM
MDO. MEDIUM DENSITY OVERLAY
MECH. MECHANICAL
MFR. MANUFACTURER
MIN. MINIMUM
MISC. MISCELLANEOUS
M.O. MASONRY OPENING
MTD. MOUNTED
MTL. METAL
(N) NEW
N/A NOT APPLICABLE
N.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACT
NOM. NOMINAL
NO. or # NUMBER
NSO. NEW STORE OPENING
N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE
O OWNER - TESLA PM
O.C. ON CENTER
OPNG. OPENING
OPP. OPPOSITE
P.LAM. PLASTIC LAMINATE
PLYWD. PLYWOOD
PM. PROJECT MANAGER
PR. PAIR
P.T. PRESSURE TREATED
RCP REFLECTED CEILING PLAN
REC. RECESSED
REV. REVISION
REQ'D. REQUIRED
RM. ROOM
R.O. ROUGH OPENING
S.C. SOLID CORE
SCHED. SCHEDULE
SF SQUARE FEET
SIM SIMILAR
SPEC. SPECIFICATION
SR. SERVICE READINESS
S.S. STAINLESS STEEL
S.T.C. SOUND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENT
STD. STANDARD
STL. STEEL
STOR. STORAGE
STRL. STRUCTURAL
SUSP. SUSPENDED
SYM. SYMMETRICAL
T. TENANT
TEMP. TEMPERED
THK. THICK
T.O. TOP OF
T.O.C. TOP OF CONCRETE
TYP. TYPICAL
U..N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
U.S. UNDERSIDE
V VENDOR
VERT. VERTICAL
V.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD
W.C. WATER CLOSET
WD. WOOD
W.R. WATER RESISTANT
W/ WITH
ACOUS. ACOUSTICAL
A.D.A. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
ADJ. ADJUSTABLE
A.F.F. ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR
ALUM. ALUMINUM
ALT. ALTERNATE
APPROX. APPROXIMATE
ARCH. ARCHITECTURAL
B.A.F. BIG ASS FAN
BD. BOARD
BLDG. BUILDING
BLKG. BLOCKING
BOT. BOTTOM
B.O. BOTTOM OF
CAB. CABINET
CLG. CEILING
CL. CLOSET
CLR. CLEAR
COL. COLUMN
CONC. CONCRETE
CONSTR. CONSTRUCTION
CONT. CONTINUOUS
CTR. CENTER
DBL. DOUBLE
DIA. DIAMETER
DIM. DIMENSION
DN. DOWN
DWG. DRAWING
(E) EXISTING
EA. EACH
EL. ELEVATION
EHS. ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH & SAFETY
ELEC. ELECTRICAL
EMER. EMERGENCY
EQ. EQUAL
EQUIP. EQUIPMENT
EXT. EXTERIOR
F.A. FIRE ALARM
F.D. FLOAT DIMENSION
F.E.F. FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET
FIN. FINISH
F.H.C. FIRE HOSE CABINET
FLR. FLOOR
FLASH. FLASHING
FLOUR. FLUORESCENT
F.O.F. FACE OF FINISH
F.O.M. FACE OF MASONRY
F.O.S. FACE OF STUDS
F.R.T. FIRE RETARDANT TREATED
GA. GAUGE
GC. GENERAL CONTRACTOR
GYP. GYPSUM
H.C. HOLLOW CORE
HDCP. HANDICAP
HDW. HARDWARE
HT. HEIGHT
HORIZ. HORIZONTAL
H.P. HIGH POINT
HPC. HIGH POWER CONNECTOR
HR. HOUR
IN. INCH
INSUL. INSULATION
INT. INTERIOR
IT. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
JST. JOIST
JT. JOINT
REFERENCE SYMBOLS
FIXTURE / EQUIPMENT TYPE
ALIGN
CL
#
-
-
-
-
XXX
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
FINISH
#
ALIGN
SECTION SECTION DETAIL
COLUMN BUBBLE AND GRID
PLAN DETAIL
DOOR NUMBER
WALL TYPE
CEILING TYPE AND HEIGHT
ROOM NAME
FINISH TAG
ELEVATION
ELEVATIONS
CENTER LINE SYMBOL
CUT LINE
DATUM POINT
KEYNOTE# ID X'-X" A.F.F.
ROOM
XXX
BUILDING CODE: CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE BUILDING CODE: 2019 STRUCTURAL CODE: CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE STRUCTURAL CODE: 2019 MECHANICAL CODE :CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE MECHANICAL CODE: 2019 ELECTRICAL CODE:CALIFORNIAELECTRICAL CODE ELECTRICAL CODE: 2019 PLUMBING CODE: CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE PLUMBING CODE: 2019 ENERGY CODE: CALIFORNIA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE ENERGY CODE: 2019 ACCESSIBILITY CODE: CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 11 ACCESSIBILITY CODE: 2019 FIRE CODE: CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE FIRE CODE: 2019
NOTES:
ALISO VIEJO AMENDMENTS TO ALL CODES ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE AT HTTPS://WWW.CODEPLUBLISHING.COM/CA/ALISOVIEJO/#!/ALISOVIEJO01/ALISOVIEJO01.HTML
CODE / PROJECT INFORMATION
SCALE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWING TITLE
ISSUE / REVISION
21-2425.00
TESLA
ALISO VIEJO, CA
41 COLUMBIA
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656
SHEET NUMBER
©
10.25.21 CUP SUBMITTAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS
HAVE BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE, THE SAME COMPLY WITH
ALL RULES, REGULATIONS AND
ORDINANCES OF ALISO VIEJO, CA
RELATING TO STRUCTURES AND
BUILDINGS.
12.21.21 CUP COMMENTS
03.18.22 CUP COMMENTS
05.17.22 CUP COMMENTS
M-ENGINEERING
750 BROOKEDGE BOULEVARD
WESTERVILLE, OHIO 43081
T: (614) 423-3967
E: [email protected]
CONTACT: LARRY MACKEY
ARCHITECT MEP ENGINEER
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
CHIPMAN DESIGN ARCHITECTS
1350 E TOUHY AVE,
DES PLAINES, IL 60018
T: (847) 298-6900
E: [email protected]
CONTACT: STEVE AJSTER
MCCOMAS O'DONNELL & NACCARATO
1717 E 116TH ST STE 200,
CARMEL, IN 46032
T: (317) 580-0402 x818
E: [email protected]
CONTACT: GREG NANCE
JRC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS
T: (949) 790-3155
E: [email protected]
CONTACT: RYAN SWANSON
LANDLORD
CIVIL ENGINEER
CRF ENGINEERING
6782 STANTON AVE
BUENA PARK, CA 90621
T: (714) 522-2266
E: [email protected]
CONTACT: CESAR RAMIREZ
PROJECT SCOPE / NOTES
TESLA MOTORS, INC. IS PROPOSING TO REDESIGN AND USE THE EXISTING 30,737 SF BUILDING LOCATED AT 41 COLUMBIA, ALISO VIEJO, CA AS AN AUTO REPAIR SERVICE FACILITY AS DEFINED IN THE LOCAL ZONING CODE. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED BP-2 (BUSINESS PARK-2) WHICH PERMITS AUTO REPAIR SERVICE USES UNDER A CONDITION USE PERMIT.
THE PROPOSED PROJECT CONSISTS OF FULLY REMODELING THE EXISTING BUILDING INTO AN
AUTOMOTIVE COLLISION REPAIR CENTER THAT WILL ADDRESS THE REPAIR OF TESLA VEHICLES THAT HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN A COLLISION.
WORK INCLUDES: NEW ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING, SERVICE AREA EQUIPMENT
INSTALLATION, NEW VEHICLE LIFTS, NEW PAINT BOOTH INSTALLATION, EXTERIOR PAINT, NEW FURNITURE AND MILLWORK. NO CHANGE TO EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND/OR SQUARE FOOTAGE.
EXTERIOR SITE WORK INCLUDES: PARKING RE-STRIPING, RE-GRADING TO MEET ADA COMPLIANCE, INSTALLATION OF NEW FENCE AND SLIDING GATE.
TENANT
TESLA, INC.
901 PAGE AVENUE
FREMONT, CA 94538
STEPHEN LI
SENIOR DESIGN MANAGER, RETAIL DEVELOPMENT
T: (415) 340-0919
E: [email protected]
297
COLUMBIA
(E) TRANSFORMER
STANDARD SETBACKS
WC
WC WC
WC WC
(N) WROUGHT
IRON FENCE W/
SLIDING GATE
AND PERFORATED
METAL
SCREENING. SEE
SHEET A2.02 FOR
IMAGE(E) TRASH ENCLOSURE TO
REMAIN
(E) MECHANICAL
PLATFORM AREA
EXISTING PROPERTY
30,737 SQ FT APPROX.
41 COLUMBIA
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656
ADJACENT
PROPERTY
73 HIGHWAY
(E) PARKING WILL GET COMPLETELY RESEALED
AND RESTRIPED. PARKING STALL WIDTHS TO BE
9'-0" WIDTH BY 18'-0" LENGTH OR 9'-0" WIDTH BY
16'-0" WITH 2'-0" OVERHANG LENGTH, TYP.
REFER TO
SHEET 2 OF
CIVIL
DRAWINGS
FOR ALL
PROPOSED
REGRADING
SCOPE
(E) PROPERTY
LINE, V.I.F.
(E) FENCE ALONG PROPERTY LINE
TO REMAIN
(E) BLOCK WALL ALONG PROPERTY
LINE TO REMAIN
STANDARD SETBACKS
STANDARD SETBACKS
(E) PARKING SPOTS 1-5
(E) PARKING SPOTS 6-7
(E) PARKING SPOTS 8-9
(E) PARKING SPOTS 10-14
(E) PARKING SPOTS 15-20
(E) PARKING SPOTS 21-26
(E) PARKING SPOTS 27-32
(E) PARKING SPOTS 33-38
(E) PARKING SPOTS 39-49
(E) PARKING SPOTS 50-58
(E) PARKING SPOTS 59-66
(E) PARKING SPOTS 67-73
(E) PARKING SPOTS 74-82
(N) KNOX BOX
(N) EV CHARGING POSTS.
FOR TESLA USE ONLY.
18'-0" TYP.
18'-0" TYP.
18'-0" TYP.
18'-0" TYP.
18'-0" TYP.
24'-0"
24'-0"
24'-0"
18'-0" TYP.
25'-0" TYP.
2'-0" OVERHANG IN FRONT OF
SPACES TO MEET 18'-0" DEPTH
2'-0" OVERHANG IN FRONT OF
SPACES TO MEET 18'-0" DEPTH
28'-8"
28'-3"
18'-0" TYP.
18'-0" TYP.
18'-0" TYP.
18'-0" TYP.
18'-0" TYP.
18'-0" TYP.
18'-0" TYP.
4 A2.01
3 A2.01
1 A2.01
2 A2.01
1 A2.03
(N) WROUGHT
IRON FENCE
(N) CHAIN LINK FENCE
SCALE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWING TITLE
ISSUE / REVISION
21-2425.00
TESLA
ALISO VIEJO, CA
41 COLUMBIA
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656
SHEET NUMBER
©
10.25.21 CUP SUBMITTAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS
HAVE BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE, THE SAME COMPLY WITH
ALL RULES, REGULATIONS AND
ORDINANCES OF ALISO VIEJO, CA
RELATING TO STRUCTURES AND
BUILDINGS.
12.21.21 CUP COMMENTS
03.18.22 CUP COMMENTS
05.17.22 CUP COMMENTS
N
SCALE:
1/16" = 1'-0"SITE PLAN 1 A1.00
SITE PLAN
AS NOTED
(E) EXIT 1
(E) EXIT 3
(E) EXIT 2
(E) EXIT 4 (E) EXIT 5 (E) EXIT 6 (E) EXIT 7
DISCLAIMER
THE SITE PLAN SHOWN WAS CREATED WITHOUT A CURRENT ALTA SURVEY AS A REFERENCE. LINEWORK REPRESENTED HEREIN WAS TAKEN FROM EXISTING DRAWINGS OF THE BUILDING, IN CONJUNCTION WITH VISUAL FIELD OBSERVATIONS.
AN UPDATED ALTA OR TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY WOULD BE REQUIRED TO CONFIRM THE ACCURACY OF THE BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN.
PARKING CALCULATIONS
REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED
AUTOMOBILE 72 82 82
ACCESSIBLE (CAR) 35 4
ACCESSIBLE (VAN) 1 0 1
TOTAL 76 87 88
ALISO VIEJO, CA CITY ZONING CODE, TABLE 15.38.040
AUTO REPAIR SERVICES, MAJOR AND MINOR: 1 PER 400 SQ FT
EXCLUDING AREAS USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR STORAGE: 1 PER 4000 SQ FT ACCESSIBLE PARKING PER ALISO VIEJO, CA ZONING CODE REQUIRES 1 ADA PARKING SPACE FOR EVERY 25 PARKING SPACES.
AUTO REPAIR REQUIRED PARKING: 28,327 SQ FT / 400 = 71
STORAGE REQUIRED PARKING: 2,410 SQ FT / 4000 = 1
STANDARD SETBACKS
MAXIMUM HEIGHT LIMIT 45 FT
MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA (FAR) 1
MINIMUM PERIMETER SETBACKS IN FEET:
FROM ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS 30
FROM LOCAL NON RESIDENTIAL STREETS 15
FROM RESIDENTIAL STREETS 40
FROM ABUTTING PARCELS IN RESIDENTIAL, OS
AND OR DISTRICTS
40 (OR A DISTANCE EQUAL TO
THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING,
WHICHEVER IS GREATER)
FROM ABUTTING COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND
OTHER NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS 10
FROM INTERIOR PROPERTY LINES WITHIN THE
SAME PROJECT 0
ALISO VIEJO, CA MUNICIPAL CODE, TABLE 15.18.030
NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(E) LANDSCAPE AREA
LEGEND
298
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF EXISTING SITE
299
PROPOSED ADA DESIGN
300
WC WC WC
WC
WC
COMPRESSORCOMPRESSOR
PALLET
JACK
ESD TABLE MAT
GROUNDED
PALLET
JACK
LINE OF MEZZANINE ABOVE
141'-2"
187'-5"29'-0"
PREP BOOTH
SPRAY BOOTH
PARTS &
STORAGE
LOADING DOCK WASH BAYCOMPRESSOR ROOM
SCALE:
3/32" = 1'-0"FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1
N
A1.01A
FIRST FLOOR
PLAN
AS NOTEDSCALE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWING TITLE
ISSUE / REVISION
21-2425.00
TESLA
ALISO VIEJO, CA
41 COLUMBIA
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656
SHEET NUMBER
©
10.25.21 CUP SUBMITTAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS
HAVE BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE, THE SAME COMPLY WITH
ALL RULES, REGULATIONS AND
ORDINANCES OF ALISO VIEJO, CA
RELATING TO STRUCTURES AND
BUILDINGS.
12.21.21 CUP COMMENTS
03.18.22 CUP COMMENTS
05.17.22 CUP COMMENTS
(E) CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN. G.C. TO PATCH AND
REPAIR AS REQUIRED TO "LIKE-NEW" CONDITION.
NEW PARTITION
LEGEND
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
NEW DOOR & FRAME
EXISTING DOOR & FRAME
FIRST FLOOR 27,479 SF
SECOND FLOOR 3,258 SF
GROSS TOTAL*: 30,737 SF
AREA BREAKDOWN (SF):
POST LIFTS 2
SCISSOR LIFTS 8
OPEN BAYS (SERVICE) 8
*NO CHANGE
SERVICE SHOP: 21,437 SF
PARTS AND STORAGE: 2,410 SF
LOUNGE: 1,040 SF
CONFERENCE: 109 SF
OFFICE: 441 SF
BREAK ROOM: 385 SF
MEZZANINE: 3,587 SF
ELECTRICAL ROOM: 264 SF
LOADING DOCK 557 SF
NET TOTAL: 30,230 SF
301
NEW GUARDRAIL TO
BE INSTALLED
NEW GUARDRAIL TO
BE INSTALLED
FUTURE OPEN
OFFICE SPACE
SCALE:
3/32" = 1'-0"EXISTING MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN 1
N
A1.01B
MEZZANINE
FLOOR PLAN
AS NOTEDSCALE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWING TITLE
ISSUE / REVISION
21-2425.00
TESLA
ALISO VIEJO, CA
41 COLUMBIA
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656
SHEET NUMBER
©
10.25.21 CUP SUBMITTAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS
HAVE BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE, THE SAME COMPLY WITH
ALL RULES, REGULATIONS AND
ORDINANCES OF ALISO VIEJO, CA
RELATING TO STRUCTURES AND
BUILDINGS.
12.21.21 CUP COMMENTS
03.18.22 CUP COMMENTS
05.17.22 CUP COMMENTS
(E) CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN. G.C. TO PATCH AND
REPAIR AS REQUIRED TO "LIKE-NEW" CONDITION.
NEW PARTITION
LEGEND
NEW DOOR & FRAME
EXISTING DOOR & FRAME
302
PKGA
PT-5PT-8
PT-8
(E) SCUPPER, TYP.
(E) DOWNSPOUT
(E) ALUMINUM PICKET GUARDRAIL
ON - TOP OF FENCE.
(E) FENCE, TYP.
T.O. (E) PARAPET
+/- 25'-0" A.F.F.
T.O. GRADE
+/- 0'-0" A.F.F.
TOP OF (E)
CONCRETE SWALE
AT BUILDING EDGE
(N) WINDOW GLAZING INFILL
(N) LOUVER
PT-5
PROPOSED
ROOF SCREEN
1234567891011
PT-5
PT-8
PT-8
(E) WATER LINES(E) GAS METER
(E) DOWNSPOUT AND
SPLASH BLOCK
(E) HOSE BIBB
(E) FIRE ALARM (E) VENTILATION
LOUVERS
GRADE
0'-0"
T.O. (E) PARAPET
+/- 29'-0" A.F.F.
T.O. (E) PARAPET
+/- 25'-0"
T.O. (E) PARAPET
+/- 28'-2" A.F.F.
12'-5"
23'-5"
9'-3"
7'-2"
PT-8
PROPOSED
ROOF SCREEN
ABCDEFGHIJMNQ KP L
PT-5
TYP.
PT-5
PT-8
(E) MOUNTED
ADDRESS PLATE
GRADE
0'-0"
T.O. (E) PARAPET
+/- 29'-0" A.F.F.
T.O. (E) PARAPET
+/- 28'-2" A.F.F.
23'-3"
12'-4"
23'-3"
PT-5
PT-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
MIT,
X
PT-5
PT-5
PT-5
TYP.
PT-8
(E) HOSE BIB(E) GAS MAIN
(E) ELECTRICAL PANEL
(E) VERTICAL
ACCESS LADDER
(E) METAL DECK
(E) LOCKBOX
GRADE
0'-0"
T.O. (E) PARAPET
+/- 29'-0" A.F.F.
T.O. (E) PARAPET
+/- 25'-6" A.F.F.
GRADE
-4'-0" +/-
T.O. (E) MECH. DECK
+/- 12'-0" A.F.F.
7'-2"
23'-1"
12'-1"
(E) WALLPACK
LIGHT, TYP PROPOSED
ROOF SCREEN
SCALE:
3/32" = 1'-0"SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1 A2.01
EXTERIOR
ELEVATION -
RENOVATION
AS NOTED
SCALE:
3/32" = 1'-0"EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 2
SCALE:
3/32" = 1'-0"NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 3
SCALE:
3/32" = 1'-0"WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 4
SCALE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWING TITLE
ISSUE / REVISION
21-2425.00
TESLA
ALISO VIEJO, CA
41 COLUMBIA
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656
SHEET NUMBER
©
10.25.21 CUP SUBMITTAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS
HAVE BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE, THE SAME COMPLY WITH
ALL RULES, REGULATIONS AND
ORDINANCES OF ALISO VIEJO, CA
RELATING TO STRUCTURES AND
BUILDINGS.
12.21.21 CUP COMMENTS
03.18.22 CUP COMMENTS
05.17.22 CUP COMMENTS
23'-3"32
7'-2"
12'-5"5 1
23'-5"5 2
9'-3"3"
12'-4"
23'-3"3
5 PT-5-P 5
7'-2"72
23'-1"
12'-1"21
PT-8
303
A2.02
EXTERIOR
RENDERINGS
AS NOTEDSCALE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWING TITLE
ISSUE / REVISION
21-2425.00
TESLA
ALISO VIEJO, CA
41 COLUMBIA
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656
SHEET NUMBER
©
10.25.21 CUP SUBMITTAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS
HAVE BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE, THE SAME COMPLY WITH
ALL RULES, REGULATIONS AND
ORDINANCES OF ALISO VIEJO, CA
RELATING TO STRUCTURES AND
BUILDINGS.
12.21.21 CUP COMMENTS
03.18.22 CUP COMMENTS
05.17.22 CUP COMMENTS
FREEWAY VIEW WITH ROOF SCREEN FRONT ENTRY
PART NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR ID FINISH REMARKS PAINT BENJAMIN MOORE BM 2124-20
"TROUT GRAY" SEE SPECS
VERIFY WITH TESLA REPRESENTATIVE EXACT
LOCATIONS IN FIELD
INTERIOR: FLAT MATTE, EGGSHELL PEARL/SATIN
EXTERIOR: FLAT LOW LUSTRE, SOFT
GLOSS/SATIN SEMI GLOSS
PAINT BENJAMIN MOORE BM 2124-50
"BUNNY GRAY" SEE SPECS
VERIFY WITH TESLA REPRESENTATIVE EXACT
LOCATIONS IN FIELD
INTERIOR: FLAT MATTE, EGGSHELL PEARL/SATIN
EXTERIOR: FLAT LOW LUSTRE, SOFT
GLOSS/SATIN SEMI GLOSS
PT-5
PT-8
PT-5 PT-5 PT-8PT-5PT-8
PT-8 PT-5
6'-0" TALL WROUGHT IRON FENCE
WITH PERFORATED METAL
SCREENING. SEE IMAGE ABOVE FOR
REFERENCE.
ROOF SCREEN DETAIL (FOR
REFERENCE)
304
K G A(N) RTU (N) RTUPROPOSED
ROOF SCREEN
GRADE
0'-0"
T.O. (E) ROOF
+/- 22'-0"
T.O. (N) SCREEN WALL
+/- 28'-0" A.F.F.
T.O. (E) PARAPET
+/- 25'-0" A.F.F.
6'-0"
1234567891011
100'-0"
GRADE
0'-0"
T.O. (E) PARAPET
+/- 25'-0"
T.O. (E) PARAPET
+/- 28'-2" A.F.F.
(E) RTU
(N) RTU (N) RTU
4'-3 3/4"
PROPOSED
ROOF SCREEN
PROPOSED PAINT
BOOTH DUCTING,
FINAL LOCATION
TBD
BCDEFGHIJMNQ KP L
100'-0"
GRADE
0'-0"
T.O. (E) PARAPET
+/- 29'-0" A.F.F.
T.O. (E) PARAPET
+/- 28'-2" A.F.F.
(N) RTU
(E) RTU (E) RTU (E) RTU (E) RTU
3'-5 1/2"
PROPOSED PAINT
BOOTH DUCTING,
FINAL LOCATION
TBD
SCALE:
1/8" = 1'-0"SCREEN WALL AT NORTH FACING WALL - SECTION 1 A2.03
SECTION AND
DIAGRAMS
AS NOTED
SCALE:
3/32" = 1'-0"EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 2
SCALE:
3/32" = 1'-0"NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 3
SCALE:
---
SCALE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWING TITLE
ISSUE / REVISION
21-2425.00
TESLA
ALISO VIEJO, CA
41 COLUMBIA
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656
SHEET NUMBER
©
10.25.21 CUP SUBMITTAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS
HAVE BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE, THE SAME COMPLY WITH
ALL RULES, REGULATIONS AND
ORDINANCES OF ALISO VIEJO, CA
RELATING TO STRUCTURES AND
BUILDINGS.
12.21.21 CUP COMMENTS
03.18.22 CUP COMMENTS
05.17.22 CUP COMMENTS
305
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPESLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPESLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPESLOPE
± 12'-0" TO MECH.
PLATFORM DECK
± 1'-8" TO (E)
LOWER SERVICE
AREA ROOF
± 1'-0" TO (E)
UPPER SERVICE
AREA ROOF
± 1'-0" TO (E)
LOWER SERVICE
AREA ROOF
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
N
SCALE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWING TITLE
ISSUE / REVISION
21-2425.00
TESLA
ALISO VIEJO, CA
41 COLUMBIA
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656
SHEET NUMBER
©
10.25.21 CUP SUBMITTAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS
HAVE BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE, THE SAME COMPLY WITH
ALL RULES, REGULATIONS AND
ORDINANCES OF ALISO VIEJO, CA
RELATING TO STRUCTURES AND
BUILDINGS.
12.21.21 CUP COMMENTS
03.18.22 CUP COMMENTS
05.17.22 CUP COMMENTS
SCALE:
1/16" = 1'-0"ROOF PLAN 1 A4.00
ROOF PLAN
AS NOTED
SEE DETAIL ON
SHEET A2.02.
306
WC WC WC
WC
WC
01 04
07 08
09 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
02 03
05 06
COLUMBIA
SCALE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWING TITLE
ISSUE / REVISION
21-2425.00
TESLA
ALISO VIEJO, CA
41 COLUMBIA
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656
SHEET NUMBER
©
10.25.21 CUP SUBMITTAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS
HAVE BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE, THE SAME COMPLY WITH
ALL RULES, REGULATIONS AND
ORDINANCES OF ALISO VIEJO, CA
RELATING TO STRUCTURES AND
BUILDINGS.
12.21.21 CUP COMMENTS
FS1-1
SITE PHOTO PLAN
AS NOTED
SCALE:
1/16" = 1'-0"SITE PHOTO PLAN 1
N
03.18.22 CUP COMMENTS
05.17.22 CUP COMMENTS
307
SCALE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWING TITLE
ISSUE / REVISION
21-2425.00
TESLA
ALISO VIEJO, CA
41 COLUMBIA
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656
SHEET NUMBER
©
10.25.21 CUP SUBMITTAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS
HAVE BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE, THE SAME COMPLY WITH
ALL RULES, REGULATIONS AND
ORDINANCES OF ALISO VIEJO, CA
RELATING TO STRUCTURES AND
BUILDINGS.
FS1-2
FIRST FLOOR
PHOTOS
AS NOTED
12345
67891 0
11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20
SITE PHOTOS
12.21.21 CUP COMMENTS
03.18.22 CUP COMMENTS
05.17.22 CUP COMMENTS
308
Tesla Collision Center
41 Columbia
PA21-027 – Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
City Council
June 15, 2022
309
Project Request
PA21-027 Request includes:
• A conditional use permit (CUP) to establish an automotive repair facility within an existing building located at 41 Columbia • Associated Site and Tenant Improvements
• Major auto repair service is permitted in the BP-2 zoning district with an approved conditional use permit
(AVMC Code Section 15.18.020)
2310
41 Columbia – Building and Site Summary
Property Information
Building Square Footage 30,737
Existing Site Size 2 acres
Existing Conditions Light Industrial Building
(former Benny Hinn
Studios) and Parking Lot
Zoning Designation Business Park-2 (BP-2)
General Plan Designation Business Park (BP)
3311
Project Vicinity
Adjacent Land Uses Zoning
North NeoGenomics
Laboratories
Business Park-2
(BP-2)
South 73 Toll Road N/A
East NeoGenomics
Laboratories
Business Park-2
(BP-2)
West UPS Fulfillment
Center
Business Park-2
(BP-2)
4312
Tesla Collision Center -
Proposed Business Operations
• Operation includes:
• Assessment of vehicle damage
• Repair or replacement of body panels, paint, glass, and mechanical and trim components
• Hours of operation: Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 12 a.m. • All repair activity will be conducted within the facility • Work in progress (WIP) cars will remain inside the building • By appointment only, minimal walk-in customers
• No loaner vehicles or shuttle service
5313
Site Plan
6314
Floor Plan
7315
Tesla Collision Center – Parking
• Parking spaces required: 73
• Parking spaces currently onsite: 88
• New parking space(s) added: 1
• All required parking contained onsite
• Parking to conform to Municipal Code
and Accessibility requirements
• Rear parking lot to be screened with a new
sliding gate
8 316
Elevations
9317
Tesla Collision Center –
Roof Equipment Screening
• Four (4) new HVAC units and
ventilation ducts
• Screening provided on
the South elevation facing
the 73 Toll Road
• Not visible from other
elevations
10318
Conditions of Approval
• No. 15 – Screening required for new roof-mounted equipment • No. 16 – Hours of operation limited to Monday - Friday 8:00 am to 12:00 am
• No. 20 & No. 21 – Vehicle delivery, storage of equipment, and vehicle repair activities shall occur in the interior of the building only
• No. 25 – Doors shall remain closed during hours of operation except while cars enter and exit the building
11319
Staff Recommendation to City Council:
1.Open and conduct a public hearing;
2.Find that the request is exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities); and
3.Adopt a Resolution approving Planning Application PA21-027 (CUP) for a conditional use permit to establish an automotive repair facility at 41 Columbia.
12320
City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: June 15, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ann Eifert, Director of Financial Services
SUBJECT: MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Recommended Actions:
1. Conduct a public hearing;
2. Declare that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Section 15061(b)(3) and Section 15273(a)(1) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations;
3. Adopt a Resolution establishing and amending user fees for various City services including credit card processing, electric vehicle charging, and hourly rentals at Iglesia Park Community Center; and
4. Authorize the City Manager, or his/her designee, to adjust fees on an annual basis using inflationary indexes.
Fiscal Impact:
It is estimated that the proposed fee updates will recover or pass through approximately $73,300 annually, depending upon the level of services provided.
Background:
The last comprehensive fee study was completed and adopted by the City Council in 2018. Best practice in government finance is for cities to update their user fees as new services are provided or when adjustments are needed to offset increased costs to the City. The City strives to recover most, if not all, of the costs for such services, although it is recognized that this is not always practical or possible.
Discussion:
Staff reviewed the City’s current fee schedule and identified fees that should be added or adjusted to achieve cost recovery. The proposed changes are needed to offset new or 321
increased costs to the City. As required by law, the fees described in this report do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which the fees are charged. Staff calculated and analyzed the cost of providing the services, including labor, materials, and overhead, as provided in Attachment 2. If approved, the fees will be effective July 1, 2022, and are as follows:
Credit Card Processing Fee
The Government Code authorizes public agencies to impose a fee for the use of a credit or debit card, as long as the fee does not exceed the costs incurred by the agency. In 2020, the City contracted with a third-party processing company to begin accepting credit card payments for building permits, planning fees, and other City services. The City currently imposes and collects a 2.7% credit card processing fee to offset the cost incurred for the electronic payment services.
An updated agreement with the processing company will set the fee at 3% and the fee collected will directly go to the processing company. By continuing to pass the credit card processing fees to the customer, the City is saving approximately $25,000 annually.
Vehicle Electrical Charging Fee and Transaction Fee
The City has 11 electric vehicle charging stations at various locations throughout the City and does not currently charge a fee for its use. Expenses incurred by the City include electricity, maintenance, replacement, and processing costs. In order to achieve cost recovery for the electric vehicle charging stations, it is recommended that the City charges $0.42 per kWh. In addition, to administer the fee payments, the City is assessed a 5% transaction fee by the vendor; therefore, Staff recommends that the 5% transaction fee is passed along to the customer. It is estimated that the City will recover approximately $48,000 in costs.
Parking Penalty Fee and Transaction Fee
To discourage long-term and overnight parking at any of the electric vehicle charging stations, a parking penalty is recommended if the vehicle is not moved after four hours.
A $5.00 penalty will be imposed if the vehicle is parked for more than 4 hours, but less than five hours. The penalty will increase to $25.00 per hour if the vehicle is not moved after five hours. To administer the fees, the City is assessed a 5% transaction fee by the vendor; therefore, it is recommended that the 5% transaction fee is passed along to the customer.
If approved, Staff will be installing signage notifying residents of the parking penalty at the charging stations in an effort to discourage long-term parking.
Iglesia Park Community Center
From time to time, staff receives requests to rent space at the Iglesia Park Community Center. Staff is proposing a fee of $38.00 per hour to recover the cost of two recreation 322
leaders who will be needed to facilitate and monitor the event. It is estimated that the center will have a few bookings a year which will recover approximately $300 annually.
To keep pace with increases in the City’s cost of providing services, it is recommended that the Vehicle Electrical Charging and the Iglesia Park Community Center fee be adjusted each year using the consumer price index (CPI) for Urban Wage Earners (CPI- W) for the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA area. Staff recommends that the Council authorize the City Manager, or his/her designee, to automatically update the fees effective July 1st by the change in CPI.
Environmental:
The proposed fees are statutorily and categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act since these fees fit within the statutory exemptions for local agency decisions involving the adoption and collection of rates, tolls and other charges, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) and Section 15273(a)(1) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
Public Notice:
A public hearing is required for the establishment of fees or when fees are increased. A notice was published on June 5, 2022, and June 10, 2022. The proposed fee changes and documentation were made available for the ten-day public review period at the City Clerk’s Office since June 5, 2022.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Fees and Calculation of Charges
323
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO
VIEJO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND AMENDING USER FEES
FOR VARIOUS CITY SERVICES INCLUDING CREDIT CARD
PROCESSING, ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING, AND HOURLY
RENTALS AT IGLESIA PARK COMMUNITY CENTER, AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER TO ADJUST THOSE FEES, ANNUALLY, USING
INFLATIONARY INDEXES, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION UNDER
CEQA
WHEREAS, under the power granted by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City of Aliso Viejo is authorized to impose fees, charges and rates for certain municipal services; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 66014 provides that fees shall not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which the fees are charged; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 6159(h)(1) authorizes cities to impose a fee for the use of a credit or debit card not to exceed the costs incurred by the agency in providing for payment by credit or debit card;
WHEREAS, the various departments of the City of Aliso Viejo have identified certain services provided on request to members of the public and organizations; WHEREAS, the revised fees and charges set forth in Exhibit A have been calculated, analyzed, and based on the actual or estimated reasonable cost of providing the services, including labor, materials, and overhead, and do not exceed such costs; WHEREAS, it is necessary to adjust certain fees annually to keep pace with increases to the City’s cost of providing services;
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously established fees and charges for various City services and each such established fee and charge is unaffected by this Resolution; WHEREAS, this hearing to set fees was duly noticed pursuant to Government Code Sections 6062(a) and 66016, Local agency fees; new fees and increases; procedures; and
WHEREAS, the proposed fees are statutorily and categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act since these fees fit within the statutory exemptions for local agency decisions involving the adoption and collection of rates, tolls and other charges, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) and Section 15273(a)(1) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and
324
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing was mailed to all interested parties who filed a written request for a mailed notice with the City; and
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2022, at the time and place specified in the published and mailed notices, the City Council held a public hearing as required by law to allow oral or written presentations prior to levying new fees or service charges and prior to approving an increase in existing fees or service charges; and
WHEREAS, at least ten (10) days prior to the commencement of the hearing, there was made available to the public a report containing the cost, or estimated cost, of providing the service for which the fee or service charge will be levied, and the revenue sources for providing such services; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council finds that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the CEQA Guidelines, the adoption of this Resolution is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) and Section 15273(a)(1) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations because CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This Resolution merely adopts or updates fees to partially offset costs of services and does not undertake any project that has the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Thus, this action is exempt from CEQA, and staff is directed to file a Notice of Exemption with the Orange County Clerk’s Office within five (5) working days of approval.
Section 2. The City Council hereby approves and adopts effective July 1, 2022, the Fees and Charges Attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 3. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or his/her designee, to make annual adjustments effective July 1 st of each year to the Vehicle Electrical Charging fee and Iglesia Park Community Center fee by a value equal to the change in the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) adopted by the City.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of June, 2022. __________________________
Ross Chun
Mayor
325
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________ __________________________
Scott C. Smith, City Attorney Mitzi Ortiz, MMC, City Clerk 326
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ALISO VIEJO )
I, MITZI ORTIZ, City Clerk of the City of Aliso Viejo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2022-__ duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo at their regular meeting held on the 15th day of June, 2022, by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
___________________________
MITZI ORTIZ, MMC
CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
327
Exhibit A
Fees and Calculations of Charges
328
Credit Card Processing Fee
Per agreement with Global Pay Cost
Pass through fee to credit card processing company 3.0% of transaction amount City of Aliso Viejo
Finance Department
Fee Calculations
329
Vehicle Electrical Charging Fee
Southern California Edison Costs
Location 10-month Cost kWh Cost Per kWh
AV Ranch 33,427 $ 87,440 0.38$ AV Center 79,500 $ 405,152 0.20 $ City Hall 59,054 $ 303,320 0.19 $
0.26$
Maintenance and Replacement Costs Annual Cost Annual Est. kWh Cost Per kWh SemaConnect Service 2,640 $ 108,000 0.02 $ Annual Maintenance 2,000 $ 108,000 0.02 $ Replacement Costs ($66,000 over 5 years) 13,200$ 108,000 0.12 $
0.17$
0.42$
1 Fee subject to CPI increases
Parking Penalty (if vehicle not moved after 4 hours)
More than 4 hours $5.00
More than 5 hours $25.00/hr
Transaction Fee (pass through to processing vendor) 5% of total transaction Average Cost per kWh
Total Cost per kWh 1
Installation and Maintenance Cost per kWh
City of Aliso Viejo
Public Works Department
Fee Calculations
330
Iglesia Park Community Center
Staffing to accommodate facility rental Hourly Cost Number of Staff Total Cost Per Hour Recreation Leader 19 $ 2 38.00$ Total Fee1 $38.00/hr
1 Fee subject to CPI increases
City of Aliso Viejo
Community Services
Fee Calculations
331
City of Aliso Viejo
AGENDA ITEM
DATE: June 15, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ann Eifert, Director of Financial Services
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 Recommended Actions:
1. Adopt a Resolution adopting the Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
2. Adopt a Resolution approving updated Salary Schedules, including cost of living adjustments and the addition of a new full-time classification.
Summary:
The draft fiscal year (FY) 2022-23 budget includes appropriations for programs and projects necessary to continue to provide essential services to the community. The draft budget anticipates revenue to exceed operating expenditures by approximately $60,838.
General Fund reserves totaling $657,050 will be utilized for debt service payment on the Certificates of Participation (COP).
General Fund revenues are estimated to be $23,838,978 for FY 2022-23, which include federal stimulus funds from the American Rescue Plan in the amount of $2,839,053. To ensure operations and service levels are not impacted, Staff is proposing a prudent General Fund expenditure budget totaling $23,778,140 and includes operating costs and capital improvement expenditures for Public Safety, Community and Economic Development, Community Services and Recreation, and Administration and Support. The General Fund balance at the end of operations for FY 2022-23 is estimated to be $26,648,944.
In addition to the General Fund, the City uses “Special Funds” to offset a portion of the City’s expenditures. “Special Funds” are typically restricted funds that can only be used for specific purposes such as Traffic Congestion Relief Funds, Gas Tax, SB 1, Measure M funds, Air Quality AB 2766 funds (AQMD), and Federal and Other Grants. At the end of operations for FY 2022-23 the estimated fund balance for all City funds is $30,510,305. 332