the west. The GPU planning area is centered at approximately 38.17941°N, - 122.25472°W (NAD 83).
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
California Endangered Species Act and Native Plant Protection Act Please be advised that a CESA Incidental Take Permit (ITP) must be obtained if the Project has the potential to result in “take” of plants or animals listed or candidates for listing under CESA or NPPA either during construction or over the life of the Project. As described in CDFW’s response letter to the NOP, the Project has the potential to impact the CESA listed as endangered species Delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus), and CESA listed as threatened species including Longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys), tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), and Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni), the latter two of which are documented to nest in and near the Project area. Additionally, the Project has the potential to impact winterrun Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and spring-run Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), which are CESA listed as endangered and threatened, respectively, and white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) and burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), which were recently approved as CESA candidate species (CDFW 2024). In addition to habitat removal and direct impacts, noise-generating or vegetation-disturbing activities, or activities resulting in visual disturbances, could result in take of nesting tricolored blackbird or Swainson’s hawk and nesting or wintering burrowing owl. Plant species such as Mason’s lilaeopsis (Lilaeopsis masonii), which is NPPA listed as rare, and Tiburon paintbrush (Castilleja affinis var. neglecta), which is CESA listed as endangered, may also occur in or near the Project and ground-disturbing activities could result in take of individuals. Due to the large Project area, additional species listed under CESA and NPPA may be impacted, as further described below. Issuance of an ITP is subject to CEQA documentation; the CEQA document must specify impacts, mitigation measures, and a mitigation monitoring and reporting program. If the Project will impact CESA or NPPA listed species including, but not limited to those described above, early consultation is encouraged, as significant modification to the Project and mitigation measures may be required in order to obtain an ITP.
CEQA requires a Mandatory Finding of Significance if a project is likely to substantially restrict the range or reduce the population of a threatened or endangered species. (Pub.
Resources Code, §§ 21001, subd. (c) & 21083; CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15380, 15064, & 15065.). Impacts must be avoided or mitigated to less-than-significant levels unless the CEQA Lead Agency makes and supports Findings of Overriding Consideration (FOC).
The CEQA Lead Agency’s FOC does not eliminate the Project proponent’s obligation to comply with CESA.
Lake and Streambed Alteration
An LSA Notification, pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 1600 et seq., is required for project activities affecting lakes or streams and associated riparian habitat.
Notification is required for any activity that may substantially divert or obstruct the natural flow; change or use material from the bed, channel, or bank including associated riparian or wetland resources; or deposit or dispose of material where it may pass into a river, lake, or stream. Project sites may contain streams, therefore an LSA Notification may be warranted, as further described below. Work within ephemeral streams, washes, watercourses with a subsurface flow, and floodplains are subject to LSA Notification requirements. CDFW would consider the CEQA document for the Project and may issue an LSA Agreement. CDFW may not execute the final LSA Agreement until it has complied with CEQA as a Responsible Agency.
DocusignEnvelopeID:8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 6-3 cont.
6-4
6-5
6-6
2-39
685
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
Raptors and Other Nesting Birds
CDFW has jurisdiction over actions that may result in the disturbance or destruction of active nest sites or the unauthorized take of birds. Fish and Game Code sections protecting birds, their eggs, and nests include sections 3503 (regarding unlawful take, possession or needless destruction of the nests or eggs of any bird), 3503.5 (regarding the take, possession or destruction of any birds-of-prey or their nests or eggs), and 3513 (regarding unlawful take of any migratory nongame bird). Migratory birds are also protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
California Fully Protected Species
Fully Protected species may not be taken or possessed at any time and no licenses or permits may be issued for their take except as follows: • Take is for necessary scientific research; • Efforts to recover a fully protected, endangered, or threatened species, live capture and relocation of a bird species for the protection of livestock; or • They are a covered species whose conservation and management is provided for in a Natural Community Conservation Plan (Fish & G. Code, §§ 3511, 4700, 5050, & 5515).
Specified types of infrastructure Projects may be eligible for an ITP for unavoidable impacts to fully protected species if certain conditions are met (Fish & G. Code, § 2081.15). Project proponents should consult with CDFW early in the Project planning process. The Project has the potential to impact the following California Fully Protected species: salt marsh harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys raviventris), also CESA listed as endangered; California Ridgway’s rail (Rallus obsoletus obsoletus), also CESA listed as endangered; California black rail (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus), also CESA listed as threatened; golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), American peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus anatum), and whitetailed kite (Elanus leucurus).
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CDFW offers the comments and recommendations below and in Attachment 1 to assist the City in adequately identifying and/or mitigating the Project’s significant, or potentially significant, direct and indirect impacts on fish and wildlife (biological) resources.
I. Project Description and Related Impact Shortcoming
COMMENT 1: Program Environmental Impact Report Subsequent Project Review The EIR is a Program EIR but does not include a checklist for subsequent project review. As described in CDFW’s letter response to the NOP, while Program EIRs have a necessarily broad scope, as described in CDFW’s NOP response letter, CDFW recommends providing as much information related to anticipated future activities as possible. CDFW recognizes that, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15152, subdivision (c), if a Lead Agency is using the tiering process in connection with an EIR or large-scale planning approval, the development of detailed, site-specific information may not be feasible and can be deferred, in many instances, until such time as the Lead Agency prepares a future environmental document. This future environmental document would cover a Project of a more limited geographical scale and is appropriate if the deferred information does not prevent adequate identification of significant effects of the planning approval at hand. The CEQA Guidelines section 15168, subdivision (c)(4) states, “Where the later activities involve site-specific operations, the agency should use a written checklist or similar device to document the evaluation of the site and the activity to determine whether the environmental effects of the operation were within the DocusignEnvelopeID:8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 6-7
6-8
6-9
6-10
2-40
686
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
scope of the program EIR.” Based on CEQA Guidelines section 15183.3 and associated Appendix N Checklist, and consistent with other program EIRs, CDFW recommends creating a procedure or checklist for evaluating subsequent Project impacts on biological resources to determine if they are within the scope of the Program EIR or if an additional environmental document is warranted. This checklist should be included as an attachment to the EIR. Also see an example in the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection’s Appendix PD-3 - Project-Specific Analysis, available at https://bof.fire.ca.gov/projects-and-programs/calvtp-homepage-andstorymap/#:~:text=The%20CalVTP%20Program%20Environmental%20Impact,with%20 the%20CalVTP%20Program%20EIR and template-psa-checklist-508-compliant.dotx https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fbof.fire.ca.gov%2 Fmedia%2Fuqbpmcuq%2Ftemplate-psa-checklist-508-
compliant.dotx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK. Future analysis should include all specialstatus species and sensitive habitat including, but not limited to species considered rare, threatened, or endangered species pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, section 15380.
When used appropriately, the checklist should be accompanied by enough relevant information and reasonable inferences to support a “within the scope” of the EIR conclusion. For subsequent Project activities that may affect sensitive biological resources, a site-specific analysis should be prepared by a Qualified Biologist to provide the necessary supporting information. In addition, the checklist should cite the specific portions of the EIR, including page and section references, containing the analysis of the subsequent Project activities’ significant effects and indicate whether it incorporates all applicable mitigation measures from the EIR.
II. Environmental Setting and Mitigation Measures Related Impact Shortcomings Mandatory Findings of Significance: Does the Project have the potential to substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare, or threatened species?
And,
Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by CDFW or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)?
COMMENT 2: Listed and other Special-Status Species Unmitigated Impacts Issue, specific impacts, why they may occur and be potentially significant: If the Project may result in physical changes in the environment, such as facilitating development, then the Project could: 1) reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare, or threatened species, or 2) have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on candidate, sensitive, or special-status species. The General Plan Area (EIR, page 2-4) has potential to support special-status species described in this letter. These species are documented to occur within 5 miles of the General Plan Area according to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). The EIR does not include specific and detailed mitigation measures for these species.
California Ridgeway’s Rail and California Black Rail
The Project has the potential to impact nesting California Ridgeway’s rail and California black rail through auditory or visual disturbances above ambient levels, or habitat removal. Disturbances from Project activities on or within 700 feet of suitable nesting habitat may result in California black rail and California Ridgeway’s rail nest abandonment and loss of eggs or reduced health and vigor and loss of young. These species are CESA listed as threatened or endangered and are therefore considered to DocusignEnvelopeID:8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 6-10 cont.
6-11
6-12
6-13
2-41
687
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
be a threatened or endangered species pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15380.
Therefore, if an active nest is disturbed by the Project, the Project could result in a substantial reduction in the species’ population, which would be a mandatory finding of significance pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15065, subdivision (a)(1). Suitable marsh habitat for both species is present along the western side of the General Plan Area, including areas near Fagan Marsh Ecological Reserve and the Napa-Sonoma Marshes Wildlife Area.
Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse
The Project has the potential to impact salt marsh harvest mouse through direct salt marsh habitat removal and injury or mortality of the species. Salt marsh harvest mouse is CESA listed as endangered and and is therefore considered to be an endangered species pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15380. Therefore, if salt marsh harvest mouse is impacted by the Project, the Project could result in a substantial reduction in the species’ population, which would be a mandatory finding of significance pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15065, subdivision (a)(1).
Swainson’s Hawk
If the work associated with the Project occurs during nesting season, any nesting Swainson’s hawks within 0.5 miles of the Project site could be disturbed by Project activities resulting in nest abandonment or reduced health and vigor of young, and take of the species pursuant to CESA. Swainson’s hawks is CESA listed as threatened and therefore is considered to be a threatened species pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15380. Therefore, if an active nest is disturbed by the Project, the Project could result in a substantial reduction in the species’ population, which would be a mandatory finding of significance pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15065, subdivision (a)(1).
The Project could result in the removal of potential foraging habitat for Swainson’s hawk, however no compensatory habitat mitigation is proposed. The breeding population of Swainson’s hawks in California has declined by an estimated 91 percent since 1900 and the species continues to be threatened by on-going and cumulative loss of foraging habitat (CDFW 2016). Therefore, reduction of Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat would be a potentially significant impact. Napa County recently recognized the need to conserve Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat to reduce impacts to less-than-significant and included Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat compensation in their Mitigated Negative Declaration for E&P Technology Way - Building A & B Use Permit, State Clearinghouse No. 2024100855 (see MND at, https://ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/2024100855 specifically Mitigation Measure BIO-5 on page 12).
Tricolored Blackbird
The Project may impact tricolored blackbird, which occurs in Napa County. The Project area encompasses the range and sections of predicted habitat for tricolored blackbird. If active tricolored blackbird nests are not detected by the proposed surveys or appropriate buffer zones are not established, tricolored blackbird could be disturbed by Project activities resulting in nest abandonment and loss of eggs or reduced health and vigor and loss of young. Tricolored blackbird is CESA listed as a threatened species and therefore is considered to be a threatened species pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15380. Therefore, if an active tricolored blackbird nest is disturbed by the Project, the Project may result in a substantial reduction in the number of a threatened species, which is considered a mandatory finding of significance pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15065, subdivision (a)(1).
DocusignEnvelopeID:8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 6-13 cont.
6-14
6-15
6-16
2-42
688
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
Burrowing Owl
The Project could result in burrowing owl nest abandonment, loss of young, reduced health and vigor of owlets, injury or mortality of adults, and permanent wintering (i.e., non-nesting) or nesting habitat loss. Additionally, the Project may result in a permanent reduction of burrowing owl foraging habitat in Napa County. Burrowing owl is a CESA candidate species and Species of Special Concern (SSC) because the species’ population viability and survival are adversely affected by risk factors such as precipitous declines from habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation; evictions from nesting sites without habitat mitigation; wind turbine mortality; human disturbance; and eradication of California ground squirrels (Otospermophilus beecheyi) resulting in a loss of suitable burrows required by burrowing owl for nesting, protection from predators, and shelter (Shuford and Gardali 2008; Department of Fish and Game Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012); personal communication, CDFW Statewide Burrowing Owl Coordinator Esther Burkett, May 13, 2022). Preliminary analyses of regional patterns for breeding populations of burrowing owl have detected declines both locally in their central and southern coastal breeding areas, and statewide where the species has experienced breeding range retraction (Department of Fish and Game Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012); personal communication, Esther Burkett, May 13, 2022). Burrowing owl have been extirpated from 16 percent of their former range and are at risk of being extirpated from another 13 percent of their range in the State (CDFW 2024). Information indicates a decline in burrowing owl range over time, burrowing owl has experienced population declines in regions of California and threats to burrowing owl, coupled with long-term population declines, suggest a high degree and immediacy of threat to burrowing owl in California (CDFW 2024). Burrowing owl is CESA candidate species and therefore is considered to be a threatened species pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15380. Therefore, if an active nest or wintering owl is disturbed by the Project, the Project could result in a substantial reduction in the species’ population, which would be a mandatory finding of significance pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15065, subdivision (a)(1).
Special-Status Plants
The EIR includes mitigation measures BIO-2 and BIO-3 for special-status plants, however these measures do not require the Project to obtain a CESA ITP for impacts to CESA or NPPA listed plants, and therefore impacts to listed plants may not be mitigated to less-than-significant.
Special-Status Fishes and Aquatic Life
The General Plan Area covers or is adjacent to estuarine, riverine, and pelagic habitats that support special-status fishes including Delta smelt, CESA listed as endangered and federally listed as threatened; longfin smelt, CESA listed as threatened and federally listed as endangered; winter- and spring-run Chinook salmon, CESA listed as endangered and threatened, respectively, and white sturgeon, CESA candidate species. Note that Project activities can remotely impact special-status fishes (e.g. pollutants introduced upstream from fish habitat). The above fish species are CESA and federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) listed or candidate species and therefore are considered to be threatened or endangered species pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15380. Therefore, if these fish would be impacted by the Project, the Project could result in a substantial reduction in the species’ population, which would be a mandatory finding of significance pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15065, subdivision (a)(1). CDFW recommends revising the EIR to include an assessment of special-status fishes and aquatic life including, but not limited to the above fish species, as well as an assessment of overall Project impacts regarding aquatic resources, streams, riparian areas, and in-water work (see Comments 3 and 4 below).
Recommended Mitigation Measures: To reduce potential impacts to listed and special-status species to less-than-significant and comply with CESA and NPPA, CDFW DocusignEnvelopeID:8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 6-17
6-18
6-19
6-20
2-43
689
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
recommends including mitigation measures in the EIR which evaluate such foreseeable potentially significant impacts. Where future site-specific impacts may not be presently foreseeable based on the Project’s broad scope, the checklist discussed in Comment 1 above should be used to determine if a future CEQA environmental document is required. CDFW would appreciate the opportunity to review a revised EIR and may have further comments once more specific-species information is provided.
For example, CDFW recommends including the mitigation measures below in this EIR:
Mitigation Measure BIO-10 (Fully Protected Species). A qualified biologist or biological monitor shall be present on site to survey and monitor for Fully Protected species, including salt marsh harvest mouse, California Ridgway’s (formerly California Clapper) rail, and California black rail, during: a) all vegetation removal, b) the construction of exclusion fencing, and c) all work within 300 feet of tidal or pickleweed habitats. The qualified biologist or biological monitor shall have the authority to stop work if deemed necessary for any reason to protect these species, or any other special-status species.
Take or possession of these Fully Protected species is prohibited and no permits may be issued for such, except in limited circumstances (Fish & G. Code, §§ 3511 & 4700).
Mitigation Measure BIO-11 (California Ridgeway’s Rail/Black Rail Avoidance and Surveys). A qualified biologist shall assess if suitable habitat for California Ridgway’s rail or California black rail habitat occurs on or within 700 feet of the Project area and shall obtain CDFW’s written acceptance of the assessment prior to the start of Project construction. Project activities within tidal marsh or suitable California Ridgway’s rail or California black rail habitat, and within 700 feet of such habitat, shall be avoided during rail breeding season (January 15 – August 31 for California Ridgway’s rail, February 1 – August 31 for California black rail) each year unless appropriately timed, yearly protocol level surveys are conducted, and survey methodology and results are submitted to and accepted by CDFW in writing. Surveys shall focus on suitable habitat that may be disturbed by Project activities during the breeding season to ensure that these species are not nesting in these locations.
If breeding rails are determined to be present, no activities, visual disturbance (direct line of sight) and/or an increase in the ambient noise level shall occur within 700 feet of areas where California Ridgway’s rail and/or California black rail have been detected during the breeding season, unless otherwise approved in writing by CDFW. If surveys have not been conducted, all work shall be conducted 700 feet from California Ridgway’s rail and/or California black rail habitat during nesting Mitigation Measure BIO-12 (Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse – High Tide Restrictions). No Project activities shall occur within 50 feet of suitable tidal marsh habitat for the salt marsh harvest mouse within two hours before and after an extreme high tide event (6.5 feet or higher measured at the Golden Gate Bridge and adjusted to the timing of local high tides) or when adjacent marsh is flooded unless salt marsh harvest mouse proof exclusion fencing has been installed around the work area.
Mitigation Measure BIO-13 (Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse – Vegetation). Prior to impacting salt marsh habitat, a qualified biologist or biological monitor, familiar with salt marsh harvest mouse, shall walk through and inspect suitable habitat prior to vegetation removal and search for signs of harvest mice or other sensitive wildlife and plants.
Following inspection, personnel, under the supervision of the qualified biologist, will disturb (e.g., flush) vegetation to force movement of salt marsh harvest mouse into adjacent marsh areas. Flushing of vegetation will first occur in the center of the site then progress toward the two sides away from the open water areas or in this case, away from impacted habitat. Immediately following vegetation flushing, personnel, under the supervision of the qualified biologist or biological monitor, will remove vegetation with hand tools (e.g., weed-eater, hoe, rake, trowel, shovel, grazing) so that vegetation is no taller than two inches.
DocusignEnvelopeID:8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 6-20 cont.
6-21
6-22
6-23
6-24
2-44
690
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
Mitigation Measure BIO-14 (Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse – Exclusion Fencing). After vegetation removal, a mouse proof barrier shall be placed along the edge of the area removed of vegetation to further reduce the likelihood of salt marsh harvest mouse returning to the area prior to construction. The fence shall be made of a heavy plastic sheeting material that does not allow salt marsh harvest mice to pass through or climb, and the bottom shall be buried to a depth of four inches so that salt marsh harvest mouse cannot crawl under the fence. Fence height shall be at least 12 inches higher than the highest adjacent vegetation with a maximum height of 4 feet. All supports for the exclusion fencing shall be placed on the inside of the work area. An approximately two-foot wide de-vegetated buffer shall be created along the habitat side of the exclusion fence.
Mitigation Measure BIO-15 (Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse – Inspections). The salt marsh harvest mouse exclusion fencing shall remain in operating condition throughout the duration of all project activities in salt marsh habitat. The qualified biologist or biological monitor shall daily inspect the integrity of the exclusion fencing to ensure there are no gaps, tears or damage. Maintenance of the fencing shall be conducted as needed. Any necessary repairs to the fencing shall be completed within 24 hours of the initial observance of the damage. Any mice found along or outside the fence shall be closely monitored until they move away from the project area.
Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-16 (Swainson’s Hawk Surveys and Avoidance Buffer): If Project activities are scheduled during the nesting season for Swainson’s hawks (March 1 to September 15), prior to beginning work on the Project, a qualified biologist shall conduct surveys according to the Recommended Timing and Methodology for Swainson’s Hawk Nesting Surveys in California’s Central Valley, unless otherwise approved by CDFW in writing2
Survey methods shall be closely followed by starting
early in the nesting season (late March to early April) to maximize the likelihood of detecting an active nest (nests, adults, and chicks are more difficult to detect later in the growing season because trees become less transparent as vegetation increases).
Surveys shall be conducted: 1) within a minimum 0.5-mile radius of the Project site or a larger area if needed to identify potentially impacted active nests, unless otherwise approved by CDFW in writing, and 2) for at least the two survey periods immediately prior to initiating Project-related construction activities. Surveys shall occur annually for the duration of the Project. The qualified biologist shall have a minimum of two years of experience implementing the survey methodology resulting in detections. If active Swainson’s hawk nests are detected, the Project shall immediately inform CDFW and implement a 0.5-mile construction avoidance buffer around the nest until the nest is no longer active as determined by a qualified biologist, unless otherwise approved by CDFW in writing. If take of Swainson’s hawk cannot be avoided, the Project shall consult with CDFW pursuant to CESA and obtain an ITP. CDFW Bay Delta Region staff is available to provide guidance on the ITP application process.
Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-17 (Swainson’s Hawk Foraging Habitat Mitigation): Impacts to Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat shall be quantified by a qualified biologist based on the final Project design plans, and the Project shall obtain written acceptance of the acreage of habitat impacts from CDFW. Prior to Project construction, the Project shall provide Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat mitigation at a minimum 1:1 ratio which shall include: 1) permanent preservation of the species’ foraging habitat through a conservation easement and implementing and funding a long-term management plan in perpetuity, or 2) purchase of Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat credits at a CDFW- approved mitigation bank, unless otherwise required by an ITP issued for Swainson’s hawk.
Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-18 (Tricolored Blackbird Avoidance): If nesting tricolored blackbird or evidence of their presence is found during nesting bird surveys within 500 2 Swainson’s Hawk Technical Advisory Committee, 2000. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=83990&inline DocusignEnvelopeID:8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 6-25
6-26
6-27
6-28
6-29
2-45
691
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
feet of Project activities, CDFW shall be notified immediately and work shall not occur without written approval from CDFW allowing the Project to proceed. Project activities shall not occur within 500 feet of an active nest unless otherwise approved in writing by CDFW. If take of tricolored blackbird cannot be avoided, the Project shall consult with CDFW pursuant to CESA and obtain an ITP.
Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-19 (Burrowing Owl Surveys): A qualified biologist shall conduct a burrowing owl habitat assessment within 1,640 feet of the Project area pursuant to the California Department of Fish and Game (now CDFW) 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012 Staff Report, available here:
https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Survey-Protocols#377281284-birds), unless otherwise approved in writing by CDFW. The qualified biologist shall have a minimum of two years of experience implementing the CDFW 2012 Staff Report survey methodology resulting in detections. The habitat assessment shall focus on searching the CNDDB and potentially other sources for any burrowing owl records on or within one mile of the Project area, vegetation type and height, suitable burrows (with an opening greater than11 centimeters [cm] in diameter and a depth of greater than 150 cm), burrow surrogates (culverts, piles of concrete rubble, piles of soil, burrows created along soft banks of ditches and canals, pipes, and similar structures), and presence of burrowing owl sign (tracks, molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, egg shell fragments, owl white wash, and nest burrow decoration material), and the presence of burrowing owl individuals or pairs. If the habitat assessment does not identify suitable habitat and surveys are not conducted as described below, an additional habitat assessment shall be conducted within 14 days prior to construction and if new potentially suitable burrowing owl refugia are present surveys shall be conducted as described below, unless otherwise approved in writing by CDFW. The results of the habitat assessment shall be emailed to the CDFW contact below, or if unavailable another CDFW representative, and the Project shall obtain CDFW’s written approval of the habitat assessment prior to starting Project activities.
If suitable burrowing owl habitat is observed, four surveys shall be conducted to detect the presence of burrowing owl pursuant to the CDFW 2012 Staff Report. The site visits shall be spread evenly throughout the breeding or non-breeding season. The Project shall obtain CDFW’s written approval of the survey results prior to starting Project activities. In addition, a take avoidance survey shall be completed within 14 days prior to the start of construction, as described in the CDFW 2012 Staff Report.
If burrowing owl is detected, the Project shall immediately notify CDFW. The Project shall avoid impacts to the burrowing owl and implement a 1,640-foot buffer area around the owl site in which no Project activities shall occur, unless otherwise approved in writing by CDFW. A Qualified Biologist shall monitor any detected owl to ensure it is not disturbed.
If the Project cannot ensure burrowing owl and their burrows are fully avoided, the Project shall consult with CDFW and obtain a take authorization or otherwise demonstrate compliance with CESA. Take is likely to occur and the Project shall obtain an ITP if: 1) burrowing owl surveys of the Project site detect burrowing owl occupancy of burrows or burrow surrogates, or 2) there is sign of burrowing owl occupancy on the Project site within the past three years and habitat has not had any substantial change that would make it no longer suitable within the past three years. Occupancy means a site that is assumed occupied if at least one burrowing owl has been observed occupying a burrow or burrow surrogate within the last three years. Occupancy of suitable burrowing owl habitat may also be indicated by burrowing owl sign including its molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement at or near a burrow entrance or perch site. If burrowing owl, or their burrows or burrow surrogates, are detected within 500 meters (1,640 feet) of the Project site during burrowing owl surveys, but not on the Project site, the Project shall consult with CDFW to determine if avoidance is feasible or an ITP is warranted and shall obtain an ITP if deemed necessary by CDFW.
DocusignEnvelopeID:8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 6-29 cont.
6-30
2-46
692
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-20 (Burrowing Owl Foraging Habitat Mitigation): Impacts to burrowing owl foraging habitat shall be mitigated as described in Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-17 above, except habitat shall be for burrowing owl, unless otherwise required by an ITP for burrowing owl.
Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-21 (Listed Plant Species Permitting). If the Project may result in impacts to CESA or NPPA listed plants, the Project shall obtain an ITP from CDFW prior to Project construction and shall comply with the ITP.
Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-22 (Special Status Fish Protection): In water work shall be avoided where special-status fish such as Delta smelt, longfin smelt, winter- and springrun Chinook salmon and white sturgeon may occur, as determined by a qualified biologist based on a review of CNDDB and consultation with CDFW. If take of the above fish species or any CESA listed or candidate aquatic listed species cannot be avoided, the Project shall obtain a CESA ITP from CDFW prior to commencing Project activities and shall comply with the ITP.
COMMENT 3: Biological Setting, EIR Section 4.3.1 and Appendix B Issue, specific impacts, why they may occur and be potentially significant:
Section 4.3.1 of the EIR describes the biological setting of the Project area to be used for assessing impacts to land cover, special-status species, nesting birds, sensitive vegetation communities and critical habitat, and wildlife movement corridors.
Appendix B - Supporting Biological Resources Information, is referenced in this section of the EIR (page 4.3 -3): “There are 51 plant species and 44 animal species with potential to occur within the Planning Area which meet at least one of the criteria for a special-status species, described above (Appendix B).” However, Appendix B does not reflect recent status updates of several species with potential to occur and be impacted by the Project and thus does accurately characterize the most current biological setting of the Project with respect to special-status species such as burrowing owl and white sturgeon which are both CESA candidate species.
Recommended mitigation measure:
Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-23 (Biological Setting). CDFW recommends revising Appendix B and associated sections of the EIR to ensure an accurate biological setting and assessment of potential impacts to special-status species.
III. Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by CDFW or USFWS?
COMMENT 4: Riparian Habitat, Wetlands, and Lake and Streambed Alteration Notification
Issue, specific impacts, why they may occur and be potentially significant: The Project could result in potentially significant impacts to riparian habitat, wetlands, or other sensitive natural communities.
Recommended Mitigation Measures: If impacts to riparian habitat, wetlands, or other sensitive natural communities may occur, to reduce potential impacts to less-thansignificant, CDFW recommends including the below mitigation measures.
Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-24 (Habitat Restoration and Compensation, and Impacts to Streams and Riparian Areas): The Project shall implement restoration onsite or offsite to mitigate temporary or permanent impacts to sensitive natural communities and wetlands at a minimum 1:1 (restore onsite temporary impacts) or 3:1 (permanent impacts) mitigation to impact ratio for acres and linear feet of impacts, or provide habitat compensation including permanent protection of habitat at the same ratio through a DocusignEnvelopeID:8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 6-31
6-32
6-33
6-34
6-35
2-47
693
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
conservation easement and preparing and funding implementation of a long-term management plan, unless otherwise approved in writing by CDFW.
Prior to the commencement of Project activities, the Project shall conduct a thorough assessment for potential impacts to streams and riparian habitat including, but not limited to impacts resulting trail clearing, earth moving, and vegetation removal. If impacts to the bed, bank, channel, or riparian area of the streams cannot be avoided, the Project shall notify CDFW for potential Project impacts to the streams pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 1600 et seq., and shall comply with the LSA Agreement, if issued. More information for the Notification process is available at https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Environmental-Review/LSA.The Project shall not commence activities with potential to impact the stream until the LSA process has been completed. Impacts to the streams and riparian habitat shall be mitigated by restoring riparian habitat at a minimum 3:1 mitigation to impact ratio in area and linear feet for permanent impacts, all temporary impact areas shall be restored, and trees shall be replaced at an appropriate ratio based on size and species, unless otherwise approved in writing by CDFW. An LSA, if issued, may include additional avoidance and minimize measures to protect fish and wildlife resources. Projects shall also obtain permits from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) pursuant to the Clean Water Act if applicable.
COMMENT 5: CDFW Napa-Sonoma Marshes Wildlife Area
Issue, specific impacts, why they may occur and be potentially significant: The General Plan Area overlaps with CDFW’s Napa-Sonoma Marshes Wildlife Area, which is a highly sensitive habitat area supporting several listed and special-status species.
Any Project impacts to this area would be potentially significant.
Recommended Mitigation Measure:
Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-25 (CDFW Napa-Sonoma Marshes Wildlife Area): Prior to any Project activities within or adjacent to the CDFW Napa-Sonoma Marshes Wildlife Area, the Project shall coordinate with CDFW and obtain CDFW’s approval to access the Wildlife Area and implement any fish and wildlife protection measures required by CDFW.
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
CEQA requires that information developed in environmental impact reports and negative declarations be incorporated into a database which may be used to make subsequent or supplemental environmental determinations. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21003, subd. (e).) Accordingly, please report any special-status species and natural communities detected during Project surveys to CNDDB. The CNDDB field survey form can be filled out and submitted online at the following link:
https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Submitting-Data. The types of information reported to CNDDB can be found at the following link:
https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Plants-and-Animals. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FILING FEES The Project, as proposed, would have an impact on fish and/or wildlife, and assessment of environmental document filing fees is necessary. Fees are payable upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the Lead Agency and serve to help defray the cost of environmental review by CDFW. Payment of the environmental document filing fee is required in order for the underlying project approval to be operative, vested, and final. (See Cal. Code Regs, tit. 14, § 753.5; Fish & G. Code, § 711.4; Pub. Resources Code, § 21089.)
DocusignEnvelopeID:8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 6-35 cont.
6-36
6-37
6-38
2-48
694
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
CONCLUSION
CDFW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the EIR to assist the City in identifying and mitigating Project impacts on biological resources.
Questions regarding this letter or further coordination should be directed to Nicholas Magnuson, Environmental Scientist, at [email protected] or (707) 815-4166; or Melanie Day, Senior Environmental Scientist (Supervisory), at [email protected] or (707) 210-4415.
Sincerely,
Erin Chappell
Regional Manager
Bay Delta Region
Attachment 1: Draft Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Plan ec: Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse (SCH No. 2022070038) Laureen Thompson, CDFW Bay Delta Region, [email protected] DocusignEnvelopeID:8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 6-51
2-49
695
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
REFERENCES
CDFW. 2024. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) Management Framework.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Sacramento, CA. Website https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/BIOS [accessed August 7, 2024].
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2024. Petition Evaluation for Western Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia hypugaea). Report to the Fish and Game Commission. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, P.O. Box 944209, Sacramento, CA.
CDFW. 2016. Status Review: Swainson’s Hawk (Buteo swainsoni) in California, reported to the California Fish and Game Commission, five-year status report.
State of California Natural Resources Agency, Sacramento, CA. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=133622&inline CDFW. 2012. Department of Fish and Game Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation.
State of California Natural Resources Agency, Sacramento, CA.
Shuford, W. D., and Gardali, T., editors. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento.
Docusign Envelope ID: 8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 2-50
696
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
ATTACHMENT 1
Draft Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Plan
CDFW provides the following language to be incorporated into the Mitigation and Monitoring Program for the Project as examples of mitigation measures. As stated in the enclosed letter, CDFW recommends that the EIR should evaluate potential Project impacts to special-status species and include additional specific mitigation measures for foreseeable potentially significant impacts.
Biological Resources (BIO)
Mitigation
Measures Description Timing Responsible Party
MM-BIO-10
(Fully Protected Species). A qualified biologist or
biological monitor shall be present on site to survey and monitor for Fully Protected species, including salt marsh harvest mouse, California Ridgway’s (formerly California Clapper) rail, and California black rail, during: a) all vegetation removal, b) the construction of exclusion
fencing, and c) all work within 300 feet of tidal or
pickleweed habitats. The qualified biologist or biological monitor shall have the authority to stop work if deemed necessary for any reason to protect these species, or any other special-status species. Take or possession of these Fully Protected species is prohibited and no permits may be issued for such, except in limited circumstances (Fish & G. Code, §§ 3511 & 4700).
Prior to and
during
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-11
(California Ridgeway’s Rail/Black Rail Avoidance and
Surveys). A qualified biologist shall assess if suitable habitat for California Ridgway’s rail or California black rail habitat occurs on or within 700 feet of the Project area and shall obtain CDFW’s written acceptance of the
assessment prior to the start of Project construction.
Project activities within tidal marsh or suitable California Ridgway’s rail or California black rail habitat, and within 700 feet of such habitat, shall be avoided during rail
breeding season (January 15 – August 31 for California
Ridgway’s rail, February 1 – August 31 for California
black rail) each year unless appropriately timed, yearly protocol level surveys are conducted, and survey
methodology and results are submitted to and accepted
by CDFW in writing. Surveys shall focus on suitable
habitat that may be disturbed by Project activities during the breeding season to ensure that these species are not nesting in these locations.
If breeding rails are determined to be present, no
activities, visual disturbance (direct line of sight) and/or an increase in the ambient noise level shall occur within 700 feet of areas where California Ridgway’s rail and/or California black rail have been detected during the
breeding season, unless otherwise approved in writing by CDFW. If surveys have not been conducted, all work
shall be conducted 700 feet from California Ridgway’s rail and/or California black rail habitat during nesting
Prior to and
during
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-12
(Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse – High Tide Restrictions). No project activities shall occur within 50 feet of suitable tidal marsh habitat for the salt marsh harvest mouse within
two (2) hours before and after an extreme high tide event (6.5 feet or higher measured at the Golden Gate Bridge
and adjusted to the timing of local high tides) or when adjacent marsh is flooded unless salt marsh harvest
Prior to and
during
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
Docusign Envelope ID: 8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 2-51
697
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
the work area.
MM-BIO-13
(Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse – Vegetation). Prior to
impacting salt marsh habitat, a qualified biologist or
biological monitor, familiar with salt marsh harvest
mouse, shall walk through and inspect suitable habitat
prior to vegetation removal and search for signs of
harvest mice or other sensitive wildlife and plants.
Following inspection, personnel, under the supervision of the qualified biologist, will disturb (e.g., flush) vegetation to force movement of salt marsh harvest mouse into
adjacent marsh areas. Flushing of vegetation will first occur in the center of the site then progress toward the two sides away from the open water areas or in this case, away from impacted habitat. Immediately following
vegetation flushing, personnel, under the supervision of the qualified biologist or biological monitor, will remove vegetation with hand tools (e.g., weed-eater, hoe, rake, trowel, shovel, grazing) so that vegetation is no taller than 2 inches.
Prior to and
during
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-14
(Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse – Exclusion Fencing). After
vegetation removal, a mouse proof barrier shall be
placed along the edge of the area removed of vegetation to further reduce the likelihood of salt marsh harvest
mouse returning to the area prior to construction. The
fence shall be made of a heavy plastic sheeting material that does not allow salt marsh harvest mice to pass
through or climb, and the bottom shall be buried to a
depth of 4 inches so that salt marsh harvest mouse
cannot crawl under the fence. Fence height shall be at
least 12 inches higher than the highest adjacent
vegetation with a maximum height of 4 feet. All supports for the exclusion fencing shall be placed on the inside of the work area. An approximately 2-foot wide devegetated buffer shall be created along the habitat side of the exclusion fence.
Prior to and
during
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-15
(Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse – Inspections). The salt
marsh harvest mouse exclusion fencing shall remain in
operating condition throughout the duration of all project activities in salt marsh habitat. The qualified biologist or biological monitor shall daily inspect the integrity of the exclusion fencing to ensure there are no gaps, tears or damage. Maintenance of the fencing shall be conducted
as needed. Any necessary repairs to the fencing shall be completed within 24 hours of the initial observance of the damage. Any mice found along or outside the fence shall be closely monitored until they move away from the
project area.
Prior to and
during
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-16
(Swainson’s Hawk Surveys and Avoidance Buffer): If
Project activities are scheduled during the nesting
season for Swainson’s hawks (March 1 to September
15), prior to beginning work on the Project, a qualified biologist shall conduct surveys according to the
Recommended Timing and Methodology for Swainson’s
Hawk Nesting Surveys in California’s Central Valley,
unless otherwise approved by CDFW in writing Survey
methods shall be closely followed by starting early in the nesting season (late March to early April) to maximize the likelihood of detecting an active nest (nests, adults, and chicks are more difficult to detect later in the growing season because trees become less transparent as
vegetation increases). Surveys shall be conducted: 1)
within a minimum 0.5-mile radius of the Project site or a larger area if needed to identify potentially impacted
Prior to and
during
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
Docusign Envelope ID: 8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 2-52
698
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
active nests, unless otherwise approved by CDFW in
writing, and 2) for at least the two survey periods
immediately prior to initiating Project-related construction activities. Surveys shall occur annually for the duration of the Project. The qualified biologist shall have a minimum of two years of experience implementing the survey
methodology resulting in detections. If active Swainson’s hawk nests are detected, the Project shall immediately
inform CDFW and implement a 0.5-mile construction
avoidance buffer around the nest until the nest is no
longer active as determined by a qualified biologist,
unless otherwise approved by CDFW in writing. If take of Swainson’s hawk cannot be avoided, the Project shall
consult with CDFW pursuant to CESA and obtain an ITP.
CDFW Bay Delta Region staff is available to provide
guidance on the ITP application process.
MM-BIO-17
(Swainson’s Hawk Foraging Habitat Mitigation): Impacts
to Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat shall be quantified by a qualified biologist based on the final Project design plans, and the Project shall obtain written acceptance of the acreage of habitat impacts from CDFW. Prior to
Project construction, the Project shall provide Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat mitigation at a minimum 1:1 ratio which shall include: 1) permanent preservation of the
species’ foraging habitat through a conservation
easement and implementing and funding a long-term
management plan in perpetuity, or 2) purchase of
Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat credits at a CDFW- approved mitigation bank, unless otherwise required by an ITP issued for Swainson’s hawk. Prior to
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-18
(Tricolored Blackbird Avoidance): If nesting tricolored blackbird or evidence of their presence is found during nesting bird surveys within 500 feet of Project activities, CDFW shall be notified immediately and work shall not
occur without written approval from CDFW allowing the
Project to proceed. Project activities shall not occur within 500 feet of an active nest unless otherwise approved in writing by CDFW. If take of tricolored blackbird cannot be avoided, the Project shall consult with CDFW pursuant to CESA and obtain an ITP.
Prior to and
during
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-19
(Burrowing Owl Surveys): A qualified biologist shall
conduct a burrowing owl habitat assessment within 1,640 feet of the Project area pursuant to the California
Department of Fish and Game (now CDFW) 2012 Staff
Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012 Staff
Report, available here:
https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/SurveyProtocols#377281284-birds), unless otherwise approved in writing by CDFW. The qualified biologist shall have a minimum of two years of experience implementing the
CDFW 2012 Staff Report survey methodology resulting in
detections. The habitat assessment shall focus on
searching the CNDDB and potentially other sources for
any burrowing owl records on or within one mile of the
Project area, vegetation type and height, suitable
burrows (with an opening of >11 cm in diameter and a
depth of >150 cm), burrow surrogates (culverts, piles of concrete rubble, piles of soil, burrows created along soft banks of ditches and canals, pipes, and similar
structures), and presence of burrowing owl sign (tracks, molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, egg shell
fragments, owl white wash, and nest burrow decoration
material), and the presence of burrowing owl individuals or pairs. If the habitat assessment does not identify
suitable habitat and surveys are not conducted as
described below, an additional habitat assessment shall be conducted within 14 days prior to construction and if Prior to and
during
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
Docusign Envelope ID: 8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 2-53
699
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
new potentially suitable burrowing owl refugia are present surveys shall be conducted as described below, unless
otherwise approved in writing by CDFW. The results of
the habitat assessment shall be emailed to the CDFW
contact below, or if unavailable another CDFW
representative, and the Project shall obtain CDFW’s
written approval of the habitat assessment prior to
starting Project activities.
If suitable burrowing owl habitat is observed, four surveys shall be conducted to detect the presence of burrowing
owl pursuant to the CDFW 2012 Staff Report. The site
visits shall be spread evenly throughout the breeding or non-breeding season. The Project shall obtain CDFW’s
written approval of the survey results prior to starting Project activities. In addition, a take avoidance survey shall be completed within 14 days prior to the start of construction, as described in the CDFW 2012 Staff
Report.
If burrowing owl is detected, the Project shall immediately notify CDFW. The Project shall avoid impacts to the
burrowing owl and implement a 1,640-foot buffer area
around the owl site in which no Project activities shall occur, unless otherwise approved in writing by CDFW. A
Qualified Biologist shall monitor any detected owl to
ensure it is not disturbed.
If the Project cannot ensure burrowing owl and their
burrows are fully avoided, the Project shall consult with CDFW and obtain a take authorization or otherwise
demonstrate compliance with CESA. Take is likely to
occur and the Project shall obtain an ITP if: 1) burrowing owl surveys of the Project site detect burrowing owl
occupancy of burrows or burrow surrogates, or 2) there is sign of burrowing owl occupancy on the Project site
within the past three years and habitat has not had any substantial change that would make it no longer suitable within the past three years. Occupancy means a site that is assumed occupied if at least one burrowing owl has
been observed occupying a burrow or burrow surrogate
within the last three years. Occupancy of suitable
burrowing owl habitat may also be indicated by burrowing owl sign including its molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement at or near a
burrow entrance or perch site. If burrowing owl, or their burrows or burrow surrogates, are detected within 500
meters (1,640 feet) of the Project site during burrowing owl surveys, but not on the Project site, the Project shall consult with CDFW to determine if avoidance is feasible or an ITP is warranted and shall obtain an ITP if deemed necessary by CDFW.
MM-BIO-20
(Burrowing Owl Foraging Habitat Mitigation): Impacts to burrowing owl foraging habitat shall be mitigated as
described in Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-17 above,
except habitat shall be for burrowing owl, unless
otherwise required by an ITP for burrowing owl.
Prior to
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-21
(Listed Plant Species Permitting). If the Project may
result in impacts to CESA or NPPA listed plants, the
Project shall obtain an ITP from CDFW prior to Project
construction and shall comply with the ITP.
Prior to and
during
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-22
(Special Status Fish Protection): In water work shall be avoided where special-status fish such as Delta smelt,
longfin smelt, winter- and spring-run Chinook salmon,
and white sturgeon may occur, as determined by a
qualified biologist based on a review of CNDDB and
consultation with CDFW. If take of the above fish species or any CESA listed or candidate aquatic listed species
Prior to and
during
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
Docusign Envelope ID: 8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 2-54
700
Brent Cooper
City of American Canyon, Community Development Director November 20, 2024
cannot be avoided, the Project shall obtain a CESA ITP
from CDFW prior to commencing Project activities and
shall comply with the ITP.
MM-BIO-23
(Biological Setting). CDFW recommends revising
Appendix B and associated sections of the EIR to ensure an accurate biological setting and assessment of
potential impacts to special-status species.
Prior to
adopting
the Final
EIR
Lead Agency
MM-BIO-24
(Habitat Restoration and Compensation, and Impacts to
Streams and Riparian Areas): The Project shall
implement restoration onsite or offsite to mitigate
temporary or permanent impacts to sensitive natural
communities and wetlands at a minimum 1:1 (restore
onsite temporary impacts) or 3:1 (permanent impacts)
mitigation to impact ratio for acres and linear feet of impacts, or provide habitat compensation including
permanent protection of habitat at the same ratio through a conservation easement and preparing and funding
implementation of a long-term management plan, unless
otherwise approved in writing by CDFW.
Prior to the commencement of Project activities, the
Project shall conduct a thorough assessment for potential impacts to streams and riparian habitat including, but not limited to impacts resulting trail clearing, earth moving, and vegetation removal. If impacts to the bed, bank,
channel, or riparian area of the streams cannot be
avoided, the Project shall notify CDFW for potential
Project impacts to the streams pursuant to Fish and
Game Code section 1600 et seq., and shall comply with
the LSA Agreement, if issued. More information for the
Notification process is available at
https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/EnvironmentalReview/LSA.The Project shall not commence activities with potential to impact the stream until the LSA process has been completed. Impacts to the streams and riparian habitat shall be mitigated by restoring riparian habitat at a minimum 3:1 mitigation to impact ratio in area and linear feet for permanent impacts, all temporary impact areas
shall be restored, and trees shall be replaced at an
appropriate ratio based on size and species, unless
otherwise approved in writing by CDFW. An LSA, if
issued, may include additional avoidance and minimize
measures to protect fish and wildlife resources. Projects shall also obtain permits from the RWQCB and USACE
pursuant to the Clean Water Act if applicable.
Prior to and
during
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
MM-BIO-25
(CDFW Napa-Sonoma Marshes Wildlife Area): Prior to
any Project activities within or adjacent to the CDFW
Napa-Sonoma Marshes Wildlife Area, the Project shall
coordinate with CDFW and obtain CDFW’s approval to
access the Wildlife Area and implement any fish and
wildlife protection measures required by CDFW.
Prior to and
during
ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant
Docusign Envelope ID: 8C185B2E-85EE-4CA7-8AE5-74FD35178CF4 2-55
701
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Letter 6
COMMENTER: Erin Chappell, Regional Manager – Delta Bay Region, California Department of Fish and Wildlife
DATE: November 20, 2024
Response 6-1
The commenter notes that the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) previously commented on the Notice of Preparation (NOP) of the EIR in a letter dated July 28, 2022. The commenter is now submitting comments on the EIR to inform the City of potential significant impacts to biological resources associated with the project.
The comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the Draft EIR, and no response is required.
Response 6-2
The commenter states that CDFW is considered as both a Trustee Agency and a Responsible Agency.
stating the following:
“The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has responsibility for issuing take permits and streambed alteration agreements for any projects with the potential to affect plant or animal species listed by the State of California as rare, threatened, or endangered or that would disturb waters of the State.”
No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response 6-3
The commenter provides a summary of the project, the project’s location, and the project’s timeframe.
The comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the Draft EIR, and no response is required.
Response 6-4
The commenter states that if the project has the potential to result in take of plants and/or animals listed under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). The commenter opines that a CESA Incidental Take Permit (ITP) must be obtained and encourages early consultation due to the possibility of significant modification to the project and mitigation measures in order to obtain a CESA Permit.
As discussed on pages 4.3-5 and 4.3-6 of the Draft EIR, impacts to state or federally listed species would require state and/or federal Incidental Take Permits. The Draft EIR determined that impacts to special-status species would be less than significant with mitigation, independent from regulatory permitting requirements. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 on page 4.3-13 of the Draft EIR stipulates that for projects within undeveloped parcels, a Biological Resources Screening and Assessment should occur to inform which additional mitigation measures, including as applicable to state-listed species, should apply. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 also states: “Pending the results of the project-specific biological analysis, design alterations, further technical studies (e.g., protocol surveys) and 2-56
702
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
consultations with the USFWS, CDFW, and/or other local, state, and federal agencies may be required.” As such, consultation with CDFW regarding impacts to state-listed species would occur, as appropriate based on project-level impacts. Please see Responses 6-12 regarding special-status species. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response 6-5
The commenter summarizes CEQA requirements regarding Mandatory Finding of Significance for threatened or endangered species and Findings of Overriding Consideration.
The Draft EIR identifies potentially significant impacts of the project, including potentially significant impacts to biological resources. All potentially significant biological resource impacts of the project would be reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of mitigation measures found in Section 4.3, Biological Resources, of the Draft EIR. Specifically, Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO-9 would mitigate impacts to threatened or endangered species to less than significant levels.
Therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations is not required for biological resources, as this is a requirement only when a significant impact is unavoidable (CEQA Guidelines Section 15093).
Therefore, the Draft EIR provides determinations of potentially significant impacts of the project.
Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 6-6
The commenter states that the project would impact streams and therefore a Lake and Streambed Alteration (LSA) Notification(s) may be required and obtained from the CDFW.
As discussed on pages 4.3-3, 4.3-8 and 4.3-9, 4.3-20 and 4.3-21, streams and wetlands under CDFW jurisdiction are present in the Planning Area. The American Canyon Municipal Code requires new development to be sited to preserve wetlands, including the retention of sufficient natural space and Section 19.24.040 of the Municipal Code restricts residential, commercial, and industrial uses in riparian corridors, limiting the potential for new development to substantially affect these areas.
Further, as discussed under Impacts BIO-1 and on Page 4.3-20 and 4.3-21 of the Draft EIR, compliance with the NPDES Construction General Permit and MS4 Storm Water Permit would ensure that potential impacts to riparian habitat, sensitive natural communities, and wetlands would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 also states: “Pending the results of the project-specific biological analysis, design alterations, further technical studies (e.g., protocol surveys) and consultations with the CDFW may be required.” As such, the City would submit an LSA Notification for impacts to CDFW jurisdiction, as appropriate based on project-level impacts. No revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 6-7
The commenter states that the CDFW has jurisdiction over actions that may result in the disturbance or destruction of active nest sites or the unauthorized take of birds, and that migratory birds are also protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
The comment provides information on protections for nesting and migratory birds and does not pertain to the adequacy of the Draft EIR. The Draft EIR includes a section titled California Fish and Game Code – Nesting Bird Protection on page 4.3-7, which outlines the protections for nesting birds under California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503 and 3513. Additionally, the Draft EIR references the Migratory Bird Treaty Act under federal regulations in Section 4.3.2 on page 4.3-5, describing 2-57
703
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
the provisions of this federal law. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response 6-8
The commenter addresses the regulations for Fully Protected species, noting they cannot be taken or possessed except under specific circumstances, such as scientific research, recovery efforts, or inclusion in a Natural Community Conservation Plan. Certain infrastructure projects may qualify for an ITP if conditions are met. The commenter emphasizes consulting with CDFW early in the planning process and identifies several Fully Protected species that could be impacted by the project, including the salt marsh harvest mouse, California Ridgway’s rail, California black rail, golden eagle, American peregrine falcon, and white-tailed kite.
As discussed within Revised Appendix B, there are 52 plant species and 45 animal species with potential to occur within the Planning Area, including six fully protected. Please see Responses 6-12 for additional information regarding special-status species. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response 6-9
The commenter states that they provide comments and recommendations to help the City identify and mitigate the project’s significant or potentially significant impacts on biological resources. The commenter also states that these suggestions are detailed in Attachment 1 to the comment letter.
The commenter provides no specific comments on the adequacy of the Draft EIR, but rather introduces comments that follow later in the letter. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 6-10
The commenter notes that the EIR is a Program EIR but lacks a checklist for subsequent project review. They recommend including a checklist to evaluate future project impacts on biological resources, ensuring they fall within the scope of the Program EIR or require additional documentation. The commenter asserts this checklist should be attached to the EIR and include all special-status species and sensitive habitats.
While the Draft EIR does not include a formal checklist, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 provides a robust framework to evaluate project-specific impacts on biological resources. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 requires that for projects proposed on undeveloped parcels, a Qualified Biologist must conduct a Biological Resources Screening and Assessment to determine whether any special-status species, sensitive vegetation communities, or other biological resources may be affected. If biological resources are identified, a project-specific biological analysis is required. This analysis identifies applicable mitigation measures (BIO-2 through BIO-8) to reduce impacts to a less than significant level.
This approach aligns with CEQA Guidelines Section 15152(c), which allows detailed, site-specific information to be prepared at the project level as long as the EIR identifies broad environmental effects and mitigation frameworks. Since Mitigation Measure BIO-1 ensures future project-specific impacts will be evaluated and mitigated, a separate checklist is not necessary. The mitigation framework also supports the ongoing identification and protection of biological resources. The City would review all future development proposals in the Plan Area to determine whether they are 2-58
704
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
within the scope of the EIR or if additional CEQA review is required. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response 6-11
The commenter suggests that the checklist should include sufficient information and reasonable inferences to support a "within the scope" conclusion of the EIR. For activities affecting sensitive biological resources, a site-specific analysis by a Qualified Biologist is recommended. The commenter suggests the checklist should also reference specific EIR sections and pages, and indicate whether all applicable mitigation measures are incorporated.
Please see the Response to Comment 6-10 for a detailed explanation of how the Draft EIR evaluates subsequent project-specific impacts on biological resources. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 requires a site-specific biological analysis to be conducted by a Qualified Biologist for future projects on undeveloped parcels. This analysis documents the presence of sensitive biological resources and ensures that applicable mitigation measures from the EIR are incorporated to reduce impacts.
The biological analysis required by Mitigation Measure BIO-1 includes identification of all specialstatus species and sensitive habitats within the project area, application of relevant mitigation measures (BIO-2 through BIO-8), and consultations with CDFW, USFWS, and other agencies, where needed. While the Draft EIR does not include a formal checklist (as none is required by CEQA), the required biological analysis achieves the same purpose by ensuring that subsequent project activities are assessed for consistency with the EIR. This process provides sufficient documentation to demonstrate whether a project falls within the scope of the EIR. No revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 6-12
The commenter notes that the project could significantly impact endangered, rare, or threatened species, or adversely affect candidate, sensitive, or special-status species through habitat modifications. The planning area has the potential to support these species, as documented within 5 miles according to the CNDDB. The commenter states the EIR lacks specific and detailed mitigation measures for these species.
As discussed in Impact BIO-1 on Draft EIR pages 4.3-11 through 4.3-13, implementation of General Plan Policies U-4.1 and U-4.8 require storm drainage maintenance and low impact development standards to protect water quality and special-status species that utilize aquatic and riparian habitats. As discussed in Impact BIO-2 on Draft EIR pages 4.3-20 through 4.3-21, implementation of General Plan Policies ENV-1.2 and ENV-1.3 require avoidance and preservation of sensitive habitat for rare and endangered species s, including coastal saltmarsh, mixed hardwood forest, oak savannah, vernal pools, and riparian habitats. Additionally, Mitigation Measures BIO-1 requires that for projects proposed on undeveloped parcels, a Qualified Biologist must conduct a Biological Resources Screening and Assessment to determine whether any special-status species, sensitive vegetation communities, or other biological resources may be affected. If biological resources are identified, a project-specific biological analysis is required. This analysis identifies applicable mitigation measures (BIO-2 through BIO-8) to reduce impacts to a less than significant level.
Following the project-specific assessment, as required by Mitigation Measure BIO-1, additional mitigation measures may be required on individual projects depending on the findings of the biological resources evaluation, including botanical surveys, protocol-level wildlife surveys and habitat assessments, plant and wildlife avoidance and minimization measures, and habitat restoration at a minimum of 1:1 for project related impacts. Specific Mitigation Measures also 2-59
705
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
include nesting bird, roosting bat, and Crotch’s Bumblebee Surveys and avoidance. Therefore, impacts to special-status species would be appropriately evaluated by a qualified biologist prior to project approval for projects tiering from the EIR. As such, no revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response 6-13
The commenter notes that the project could impact nesting California Ridgeway’s rail and California black rail within 700 feet through disturbances or habitat removal. Disturbing an active nest could significantly reduce the species' population, a mandatory finding of significance under CEQA.
Suitable marsh habitat for these species is present along the western side of the General Plan Area.
The General Plan Update does not propose development or change land use designations that would facilitate development within salt marsh habitat or within 700 feet of the salt marsh habitat.
Rather, changes in the proposed General Plan Update within 700 feet of salt marsh habitat include land use amendments converting Low Residential to Open Space, thus removing some development potential compared to existing conditions. The American Canyon Municipal Code states that only public recreational facilities and outdoor recreation and sports are conditionally allowed within the Open Space zoning district. Accordingly, it can be concluded that the conversion from Low Residential to Open Space would not result in greater impacts.
Furthermore, as discussed in Impact BIO-1 on pages 4.3-11 through 4.3-13, implementation of General Plan Policy U-4.1 and U-4.8 requires storm drainage maintenance and low impact development standards to protect water quality and special-status species habitats. As discussed in Impact BIO-2 on Draft EIR pages 4.3-20 through 4.3-21, implementation of General Plan Policy ENV1.2 and ENV-1.3 require avoidance and preservation of sensitive habitat for rare and endangered species, including coastal saltmarsh. Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-5, and BIO-6 require a biological resources evaluation including the potential for agency consultation and permitting, protocol-level surveys and habitat assessments, and avoidance and minimization measures for project related impacts. As such, no revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response 6-14
The commenter notes that the project could impact the salt marsh harvest mouse through habitat removal and potential injury or mortality. If impacted, the project could significantly reduce the species' population, a mandatory finding of significance under CEQA Guidelines section 15065(a)(1).
Please see Response 6-13, which explains that the project would not impact salt marsh habitat.
Therefore, impacts on salt marsh harvest mouse are not expected and no revisions to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-15
The commenter notes that if the project occurs during nesting season, it could disturb nesting Swainson’s hawks within 0.5 miles, potentially causing nest abandonment or harm to young.
Swainson’s hawks are listed as threatened under CESA and CEQA. The project could also remove potential foraging habitat for Swainson’s hawk, with no compensatory habitat mitigation proposed.
The commenter adds that Napa County has recognized the need to conserve Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat and included compensation measures in a recent Mitigated Negative Declaration. 2-60
706
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Development facilitated by the project would occur primarily within existing development, and changes to land uses under the General Plan Update are primarily conversions of other uses to Open Space. Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-5, and BIO-6 require a biological resources evaluation including the potential for agency consultation and permitting, protocol-level surveys and habitat assessments, and avoidance and minimization measures for project related impacts. Therefore, impacts to Swainson’s hawk would be appropriately evaluated with coordination from a qualified biologist prior to project approval for projects tiering from the EIR. As such, no revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response 6-16
The commenter notes that the project may impact tricolored blackbirds, as the project area includes predicted habitat for this species. If active nests are not detected or appropriate buffer zones are not established, project activities could disturb the birds, leading to nest abandonment, loss of eggs, or harm to young.
Development facilitated by the project would occur primarily within existing development, and changes to the land uses under the General Plan Update are primarily conversions of other uses to Open Space. As discussed under Response 6-13, the American Canyon Municipal Code states that only public recreational facilities and outdoor recreation and sports are conditionally allowed within the Open Space zoning district. As such, no development would occur within zoned Open Space.
As discussed in Impact BIO-1 on Draft EIR pages 4.3-11 through 4.3-13, implementation of General Plan Policy U-4.1 and U-4.8 requires storm drainage maintenance and low impact development standards to protect water quality and special-status species habitats. As discussed in Impact BIO-2 on Draft EIR pages 4.3-20 through 4.3-21, implementation of General Plan Policies ENV-1.2 and ENV1.3 require avoidance and preservation of sensitive habitat for rare and endangered species, including coastal saltmarsh and riparian habitats. Additionally, Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-5, and BIO-6 require a biological resources evaluation, protocol-level surveys and habitat assessments, and avoidance and minimization measures for project related impacts. Therefore, impacts to tricolored blackbird would be appropriately evaluated by a qualified biologist prior to project approval for projects tiering from the EIR. As such, no revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response 6-17
The commenter notes that the project could lead to burrowing owl nest abandonment, loss of young, reduced health of owlets, injury or mortality of adults, and loss of wintering or nesting habitat.
Additionally, the project may reduce burrowing owl foraging habitat in Napa County.
Development facilitated by the project would occur primarily within existing development, and changes to land use under the General Plan Update are primarily conversions of other uses to Open Space. As discussed in Impact BIO-1 in Section 4.3-11 through 4.3-13, Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-5, and BIO-6 require a biological resources evaluation including potential permitting requirements, protocol-level surveys and habitat assessments, avoidance and minimization measures for project related impacts. As discussed in Impact BIO-2 on Draft EIR pages 4.3-20 through 4.3-21, implementation of General Plan Policies ENV-1.2 and ENV-1.3 require avoidance and preservation of sensitive habitat for rare and endangered species. Therefore, impacts to burrowing owl would be appropriately evaluated with coordination from a qualified biologist prior to project approval for projects tiering from the EIR. As such, no revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
2-61
707
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Response 6-18
The commenter notes that while the EIR includes Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-3 for specialstatus plants, these measures do not require the project to obtain a CESA ITP for impacts to CESA or NPPA listed plants. Therefore, impacts to listed plants may not be mitigated to a less-than-significant level.
As discussed in Impact BIO-1 in Section 4.3-11 through 4.3-13, Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-2, BIO-3, and BIO-4 require a biological resources evaluation including the potential for agency consultation and permitting, botanical surveys, avoidance and minimization measures, and habitat restoration at a minimum of 1:1 for project related impacts. Therefore, impacts to special status plants would be appropriately evaluated with coordination from a qualified biologist prior to project approval for projects tiering from the EIR. Obtaining a regulatory permit itself is not mitigation, and the City would obtain an ITP for impacts to state-listed plants should those impacts be anticipated to occur. As such, no revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response 6-19
The commenter notes that the planning area includes habitats that support special-status fish species such as Delta smelt, longfin smelt, winter- and spring-run Chinook salmon, and white sturgeon. The commenter recommends revising the EIR to assess impacts on special-status fish and aquatic life, as well as overall impacts on aquatic resources, streams, riparian areas, and in-water work.
Development facilitated by the project would occur primarily within existing development, and no development is proposed in riverine habitat. As discussed in Impact BIO-1 on pages 4.3-11 through
4.3-13, implementation of General Plan Policy U-4.1 and U-4.8 requires storm drainage maintenance and low impact development standards to protect water quality and special-status species habitats.
As discussed in Impact BIO-2 on Draft EIR pages 4.3-20 through 4.3-21, implementation of General Plan Policy ENV-1.2 and ENV-1.3 require avoidance and preservation of sensitive habitat for rare and endangered species, including coastal saltmarsh. Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-5, and BIO-6 require a biological resources evaluation including the potential for agency consultation and permitting, protocol-level surveys and habitat assessments, and avoidance and minimization measures for project related impacts. As such, no revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response 6-20
The commenter recommends including mitigation measures in the EIR to reduce impacts on listed and special-status species to less-than-significant levels and comply with CESA and NPPA. They suggest using a checklist to determine if future CEQA documentation is needed for unforeseeable site-specific impacts. CDFW requests the opportunity to review a revised EIR and may provide further comments with more specific species information.
Please see Responses 6-10, and 6-11 regarding project applicability within the scope of the EIR and the site-specific biological evaluation conducted under Mitigation Measure BIO-1. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment. 2-62
708
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Response 6-21
The commenter suggests a new mitigation measure to address Fully Protected species.
Please see Responses 6-15, 6-16, 6-17, and 6-18 regarding project impacts to Swainson’s hawks, tricolored blackbirds, burrowing owls, and CESA or NPPA listed plants. Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-22
The commenter suggests a new mitigation measure to address California Ridgeway’s Rail/Black Rail avoidance and surveys.
Please see Responses 6-13 regarding project impacts to salt marsh habitats and California Ridgeway’s Rail/Black Rail. Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-23
The commenter suggests a new mitigation measure to address salt marsh harvest mouse high tide restrictions.
Please see Responses 6-13 regarding project impacts to salt marsh habitats and salt marsh harvest mouse. Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-24
The commenter suggests a new mitigation measure to address salt marsh harvest mouse vegetation.
Please see Responses 6-13 regarding project impacts to salt marsh habitats and salt marsh harvest mouse. Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-25
The commenter suggests a new mitigation measure to address salt marsh harvest mouse exclusion fencing.
Please see Responses 6.13 regarding project impacts to salt marsh habitats and salt marsh harvest mouse. Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-26
The commenter suggests a new mitigation measure to address salt marsh harvest mouse inspections.
Please see Responses 6.13 regarding project impacts to salt marsh habitats and salt marsh harvest mouse. Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
2-63
709
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Response 6-27
The commenter suggests a new mitigation measure to address Swainson’s hawk surveys and avoidance buffer.
Please see Responses 6.15 regarding project impacts to Swainson’s hawk. Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-28
The commenter suggests a new mitigation measure to address Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat.
Please see Responses 6.15 regarding project impacts to Swainson’s hawk. Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-29
The commenter suggests a new mitigation measure to address tricolored blackbird avoidance.
Please see Responses 6.16 regarding project impacts to tricolored blackbird. Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-30
The commenter suggests a new mitigation measure to address burrowing owl surveys.
Please see Responses 6.17 regarding project impacts to burrowing owl. Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-31
The commenter suggests a new mitigation measure to address burrowing owl foraging habitat mitigation.
Please see Responses 6.17 regarding project impacts to burrowing owl. Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-32
The commenter suggests a new mitigation measure to address listed plant species permitting.
Please see Responses 6.18 and 6.12 regarding project impacts to special status plants. Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-33
The commenter suggests a new mitigation measure to address special status fish protection.
Please see Responses 6.13 regarding project impacts to salt marsh and river habitats. Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
2-64
710
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Response 6-34
The commenter notes that Section 4.3.1 of the Draft EIR describes the biological setting for assessing impacts on various ecological aspects. However, Appendix B, which lists potential special-status species in the planning area, does not reflect recent status updates for species like burrowing owl and white sturgeon, both CESA candidate species. Therefore, the commenter recommends revising Appendix B and associated sections of the EIR to ensure an accurate biological setting and assessment of potential impacts to special-status species.
The definition of special-status species has been updated in Revised Appendix B in accordance with this comment. Further, the following changes have been made to page 4.3-3 of the Draft EIR:
The results of these scientific database queries are provided as Revised Appendix B of this EIR.
There are 51 52 plant species and 44 45 animal species with potential to occur within the Planning Area which meet at least one of the criteria for a special status species, described above (Appendix B).
The updated table is included as Revised Appendix B to this Final EIR. No additional revisions to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-35
The commenter notes that the project could result in potentially significant impacts to riparian habitat, wetlands, or other sensitive natural communities and recommends a mitigation measure to address habitat restoration and compensation, and impacts to streams and riparian areas.
Please see Responses 6-6, 6-12 and 6-18 regarding project impacts to wetlands, riparian habitats, and sensitive plant communities. As stated therein, Mitigation Measure BIO-4 requires a Habitat Restoration Plan and impacts to be mitigated at a ratio not lower than 1:1 per acre of impact (and 1:1 per tree), and to be determined by the City in coordination with CDFW and USFWS as and if applicable. A requirement for 3:1 mitigation for permanent impacts may be a permitting requirement for impacts to CDFW jurisdiction, but is too restrictive to apply to all projects that may require a Habitat Restoration Plan (such as impacts to non-listed special-status CRPR 1B and 2 plant populations). Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-36
The commenter notes that the General Plan Area overlaps with CDFW’s Napa-Sonoma Marshes Wildlife Area, which is a highly sensitive habitat area supporting several listed and special-status species. The commenter provides a mitigation measure to address impacts to the Napa-Sonoma Marshes Wildlife Area.
The General Plan Update does not propose development or land use designations that would facilitate development within Napa-Sonoma Marshes Wildlife Area. Changes to land use under the General Plan Update adjacent to salt marsh habitat include land use amendments converting Low Residential to Open Space. As discussed in Impact BIO-1 on pages 4.3-11 through 4.3-13, implementation of General Plan Policy U-4.1 and U-4.8 requires storm drainage maintenance and low impact development standards to protect water quality and special-status species habitats. As discussed in Impact BIO-2 on Draft EIR pages 4.3-20 through 4.3-21, implementation of General Plan Policy ENV-1.2 and ENV-1.3 require avoidance and preservation of sensitive habitat for rare and endangered species, including coastal saltmarsh. Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-5, and BIO-6 2-65
711
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
require a biological resources evaluation including the potential for agency consultation and permitting, protocol-level surveys and habitat assessments, and avoidance and minimization measures for project related impacts.
Please see Responses 6.6, 6.12, 6.13, and 6.19 regarding project impacts to wetlands, sensitive plant communities, and salt marsh and river habitats. Based on these responses, additional mitigation measures are not warranted and no changes to the Draft EIR are required.
Response 6-37
The commenter asks that any special-status species and natural communities detected during project surveys be reported to the CNDDB.
The comment is noted. Any special-status species and natural communities detected during project surveys will be sent to the CNDDB for reporting. The comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the Draft EIR, and no revision to the EIR is required.
Response 6-38
The commenter reminds the City of CEQA filing fees. The commenter concludes their letter thanking the City for opportunity to comment and provides contact information to follow up.
The City thanks the commenter for their reminder of recording obligations and filing fees. This comment does not pertain to the Draft EIR or CEQA, other than describing the circulation of the Notice of Availability of the Draft EIR. Therefore, no additional revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
2-66
712
P.O. Box 5157 | Napa, CA 94581 | (707) 258-6318 | www.napabike.org December 28, 2024
Jason Holley, City Manager, City of American Canyon
4381 Broadway Street, Suite 201,
American Canyon, CA 94503
RE: 2040 General Plan Update
Dear Mr. Holley,
The Napa County Bicycle Coalition—which works to make biking in Napa County safe, accessible, and convenient—appreciates many of the goals and guiding principles of the draft 2040 General Plan (“the Plan”), including the intention to “Include funding for the City's Bicycle Plan updates and bikeway improvements consistent with the Bicycle Plan in the City's transportation financing program and TIF, recognizing the multi-modal travel needs of the City.” We appreciate the attention throughout the Plan to active transportation and to how it is recognized as a key strategy to meet climate goals.
We also noticed several opportunities where we believe new or updated language would make the plan stronger and better set it up for success. Those changes are detailed in the table below, but we also wanted to note the following to give context to our requests and recommendations:
• We would like to see the Open Space, Active Transportation, and Sustainability Commission (OSATS) explicitly included in decision-making on active transportation facilities, especially when the City of American Canyon is considering deviating from its Active Transportation Plan, on which, presumably, the OSATS will have provided input.
This will help leverage the unique perspective and expertise the OSATS can provide and to increase the return on investment the City has made in convening this advisory body. • We urge the City to be as specific and measurable as possible in setting goals and policies. If including specific targets, such as those related to reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled or implementing the Active Transportation Plan, comes with concerns, then inserting “strive to meet…”, or a similar phrase is an option, too. Setting and including specific targets helps all staff and community members to be on the same page, it signals true commitment, and it aids in setting appropriate timelines. • We request that the City consider including policies related to Safe Routes to School, a partnership that is integral to increasing safety and educating and encouraging active transportation users. Funding for Safe Routes programming is tenuous each year and will need the ongoing collaboration of all jurisdictions to ensure its sustainability.
Currently, the American Canyon Police Department supports Safe Routes programming in American Canyon by sharing the quarterly data that is required to secure funding, and a representative will begin participating in the Safe Routes to School Advisory Committee in 2025. As well, a policy related to securing and maintaining a Bicycle Friendly Communities designation would help build on current momentum toward this goal and would help maintain the effort into the future.
Letter 7
7-1
7-2
7-3
7-4
7-5
7-6
2-67
713
P.O. Box 5157 | Napa, CA 94581 | (707) 258-6318 | www.napabike.org Napa County Bicycle Coalition’s
Recommended Changes to the Draft 2040 General Plan
Policy Current Language Suggested Revisions/Comments/Questions MOB-1.2
Complete Street Standards. Review current
arterial, collector, and local street standards
and update as necessary to conform to best
practice classification standards and
NACTO complete streets guidelines.
Consider also including the recently released 5th
Edition of Comprehensive Bike Guide by AASHTO,
which will be incorporated into NVTA’s Active
Transportation Plan update.
MOB-1.4
Development Review. Evaluate new
development to ensure that the safety,
comfort, and convenience of pedestrians,
bicyclists and transit users are given equal
level of consideration to motor vehicle
operators.
Development Review. Evaluate new development
to ensure that the safety, comfort, and convenience
of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users are given
an equal or greater level of consideration to motor
vehicle operators. (Note: this change will help
reduce VMT).
MOB1.7
Promote Walking and Bicycling. Promote
walking and bicycling for transportation,
recreation, and improvement of public
Health.
Promote Walking and Bicycling. Promote walking
and bicycling for transportation, recreation, and
improvement of public Health and the
environment.
MOB1.9
SR 29 Mobility. Work with regional
partners, including Caltrans, NVTA, and
other agencies to explore a complete streets
approach that will expand the travel
capacity of SR 29.
SR 29 Mobility. Work with regional partners,
including Caltrans, NVTA, and other agencies to
explore a complete streets approach that will
expand the travel capacity of SR 29 and establish a
low-stress method for crossing for students walking
and biking to school and other active transportation
users
MOB1.15
Existing Facility Use. Make efficient use of
existing transportation facilities and
improve these facilities as necessary in
accordance with the Circulation Map.
Existing Facility Use. Make efficient use of
existing transportation facilities and improve these
facilities as necessary in accordance with the
Circulation Map and NVTA Active Transportation
Plan.
MOB1.17
Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled. Through
layout of land uses, improved alternate
travel modes, and provision of more direct
routes, strive to reduce the total vehicle
miles traveled by city and non-residents
traveling to American Canyon to work or
shop.
Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled. Through layout of
land uses, improved alternate travel modes, and
provision of more direct routes for all modes of
travel, strive to reduce the total vehicle miles
traveled by city and non-residents traveling to
American Canyon to work or shop by 30% by 2045
(with 2019 levels as the baseline), per the
California Air Resources Board’s Scoping Plan.
MOB1.22
Non-motorized Circulation System. Provide
safe and direct pedestrian routes and
bikeways between places.
Non-motorized Circulation System. Provide safe,
low-stress, and direct pedestrian routes and
bikeways between places. Aim to complete at
least 50% of the planned bike and pedestrian
network outlined in NVTA’s Active
Transportation Plan by 2040.
MOB1.24
Bicycle Facilities. Bicycle facilities shall be
provided to complete a continuous bikeway
system, consistent with state standards,
as shown on the Bikeway Plan Map. In
cases where existing right of way
Bicycle Facilities. Bicycle facilities shall be
provided to complete a continuous, low-stress
bikeway system, consistent with state standards the
Active Transportation Plan as shown on the
Bikeway Plan Map. In cases where existing right of
7-7
7-8
7-9
7-10
7-11
7-12
7-13
7-14
2-68
714
P.O. Box 5157 | Napa, CA 94581 | (707) 258-6318 | www.napabike.org constraints limit development of Class II or
Class IV facilities, Class Ill signage and
demarcation may be permitted at the
discretion of the City Engineer. Deviations
from these standards and from the routing
shown on the diagram shall be permitted
with the approval of the City Engineer.
way constraints limit development of Class I, II or
IV facilities, Class Ill signage and demarcation may
be permitted at the discretion of the City Engineer
the City of American Canyon will strive to provide
an alternative low-stress route, rather than
installing facilities that are not low-stress.
Deviations from these standards and from the
routing shown on the diagram shall be first
reviewed by the Open Space, Active
Transportation, and Sustainability Commission and
will be permitted with the approval of the City
Engineer only when an Exception Standard has
been met with substantial evidence.
MOB-2.2
Context Sensitive Design. Improve
multimodal transportation safety by
expanding the City’ s non- motorized
transportation infrastructure using context
sensitive design.
Context Sensitive Design. Apply a context
sensitive design lens to improve multimodal
transportation safety while expanding the City’s
non- motorized transportation infrastructure using
context sensitive design.
MOB2.3
Bicycle Safety. Increase the safety of those
traveling by bicycle by sweeping debris
from and repairing bicycle paths and lanes.
Bicycle Safety Facilities Maintenance. Increase the
safety of those traveling by bicycle by sweeping
debris from bicycle paths and lanes at least twice
per month and repairing and restriping worn or
damaged facilities.
MOB2.4
Improved Bikeway Visibility. Use visual
cues, such as brightly colored paint on bike
lanes or a one-foot painted buffer strip,
along bicycle routes to provide a visual
signal to drivers to watch out for bicyclists
and nurture a " share the lane" ethic,
prioritizing bikeways with recent
automobile- bicycle collisions.
Upgrade Existing Bikeways using all means
available—such as conflict markings, buffers,
rumble strips, and delineators—to make bikeways
safer and lower stress and to catch up with evolving
best practices, prioritizing bikeways with recent
automobile- bicycle collisions and those that are
routes to school.
MOB2.5
Speeds on Residential and Arterial Streets.
Explore innovative ways to reduce
vehicular speeds through residential
neighborhoods to posted speed limits, such
as implementing traffic calming strategies
such as: enhanced cross walks, lighted
crosswalks, reducing lane widths, and
others.
Speeds on Residential, Collector, and Arterial
Streets. Explore innovative ways to Implement
American Canyon’s Traffic Calming Program that
includes evidence-based ways to methods of
reducing vehicular speeds through residential
neighborhoods to posted speed limits, such as
implementing traffic calming strategies: enhanced
cross walks, lighted crosswalks, reducing lane
widths, and others.
MOB 2.7
Partner with public, nonprofit, and community
stakeholders to secure dedicated funding for the
education and infrastructure needs of the
Countywide Safe Routes To School Partnership
to provide safe and equitable access for students
going by active transportation to local schools.
MOB
1.29 Secure and maintain status as a Bicycle
Friendly Community.
7-14
cont.
7-15
7-16
7-17
7-18
7-19
7-20
2-69
715
P.O. Box 5157 | Napa, CA 94581 | (707) 258-6318 | www.napabike.org ENV9.5
Vehicle Miles Travelled Reduction.
Reduce vehicle miles travelled by
encouraging future land uses that
feature a compact mixed- use urban
form connected with pedestrian
and bicycle trails.
Vehicle Miles Travelled Reduction. Reduce
vehicle miles travelled by 30% by 2045 (with
2019 levels as the baseline), per the California Air
Resources Board’s Scoping Plan by encouraging
future land uses that feature a compact mixeduse urban form connected with pedestrian and bicycle trails.
ENV10.10
Active Transportation. Improve active
transportation options within the city by
connecting local bikeways and trails to
City bus stops and public transportation
centers.
Active Transportation. Improve active
transportation options within the city by
connecting local bikeways and trails to City
bus stops, public transportation centers, and
major destinations, and aiming to complete at
least 50% of the planned bike and pedestrian
network by 2040.
ENV11.9
Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian
Plans. Work with the County to
implement the best practices provided
within the American Canyon edition of
the Napa Countywide Bicycle Plan
and Napa Countywide Pedestrian Plan.
Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans.
Work with the County to implement the best
practices provided within the American
Canyon edition of the most up-to-date Napa
Countywide Bicycle Plan and Napa
Countywide Pedestrian Plan/Active
Transportation Plan, aiming to complete at least
50% of the planned bike and pedestrian
network by 2040.
MOBFigure 6
Pg M-17
MOB- Figure 6: Standard Roadway
Cross Sections
Update this figure or note that 5’ bike lanes
excluding gutter pan with 3’ buffers containing
delineators are standard for bike lanes along all
types of arterials and often for major collectors,
too.
Types of
Bikeways
Pg M-21
Types of Bikeways
Update to include Class 2Bs.
Thank you for your consideration of these changes. Given the significance and scope of this Plan, and the opportunity it presents to address our climate emergency and create a meaningful shift to Complete Streets, we urge all involved to ensure the document reflects more commitment to its goals and truly enables and empowers the City to realize the 2040 General Plan.
Should you have any questions about the above comments, please contact me at (707) 258- 6318 or at [email protected]. Thank you for your time and your ongoing hard work on this Plan.
Sincerely,
Kara Vernor
Executive Director
7-21
7-22
7-23
7-24
7-25
7-26
2-70
716
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Letter 7
COMMENTER: Napa County Bike Coalition
DATE: December 28, 2024
Response 7-1
The commenter states that they appreciate the draft 2040 General Plan's goals and guiding principles. They specifically commend the Plan's intention to include funding for Bicycle Plan updates and bikeway improvements in the City's transportation financing program, recognizing the importance of active transportation in meeting climate goals.
This comment is noted and no revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response 7-2
The commenter identifies opportunities for new or updated language to strengthen the plan and set it up for success [as discussed in Responses 7-3 through 7-25, below], providing context for their requests and recommendations.
This comment is noted and no revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response 7-3
The commenter suggests explicitly including the Open Space, Active Transportation, and Sustainability Commission in decision-making on active transportation facilities, especially when deviating from the Active Transportation Plan.
This comment addresses organizational policy for the City but does not pertain to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-4
The commenter urges the City to set specific and measurable goals and policies. They suggest including specific targets, such as reducing VMT or implementing the Active Transportation Plan, and using phrases like "strive to meet" if there are concerns.
The General Plan, at its core, serves as a guiding document for the City's long-term vision and strategic direction. As noted by the commenter, specific and measurable goals and policies are important, but it is crucial to recognize that the document is inherently programmatic and broad in nature. Specific targets, such as reducing VMT or implementing the Active Transportation Plan, are indeed valuable but are more appropriately addressed as a subsequent action to the General Plan and EIR. As such, the following General Plan policies are discussed on page 4.11-8 of the Draft EIR:
Policy MOB-1.1: Complete Streets. Maintain and update street standards that that serves not just automobile operations, but also multi-modal movement and adjacent land uses, including pedestrians, motorists, bicyclists, and transit riders of all ages and abilities, in a form that is compatible with and complementary to adjacent land uses, and promotes connectivity between uses and areas.
Policy MOB-1.7: Promote Walking and Bicycling. Promote walking and bicycling for transportation, recreation, and improvement of public health. 2-71
717
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Policy MOB-1.17: Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled. Through layout of land uses, improved alternate travel modes, and provision of more direct routes, strive to reduce the total vehicle miles traveled by city and non-residents traveling to American Canyon to work or shop. Policy MOB-1.20: Bicycle Plan Funding. Include funding for the City's Bicycle Plan updates and bikeway improvements consistent with the Bicycle Plan in the City's transportation financing program and TIF, recognizing the multi-modal travel needs of the City. Policy MOB-1.22: Non-motorized Circulation System. Provide safe and direct pedestrian routes and bikeways between places.
Policy MOB-1.23: Pedestrian Connections to Employment Destinations. Encourage the development of a network of continuous walkways within new commercial, town center, public, and industrial uses to improve workers' ability to walk safely around, to, and from their workplaces. Where possible, route pedestrians to grade separated crossings over State Route 29.
Policy MOB-1.24: Bicycle Facilities. Bicycle facilities shall be provided to complete a continuous bikeway system, consistent with state standards, as shown on the Bikeway Plan Map. In cases where existing right of way constraints limit development of Class II or Class IV facilities, Class Ill signage and demarcation may be permitted at the discretion of the City Engineer. Deviations from these standards and from the routing shown on the diagram shall be permitted with the approval of the City Engineer.
However, the broad scope of the General Plan necessitates flexibility in how these targets are approached and achieved. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
Response 7-5
The commenter requests the City to include policies related to Safe Routes to School, emphasizing its importance for safety and active transportation education. They highlight the need for ongoing collaboration to ensure sustainable funding and note the American Canyon Police Department's current support and future participation in the Safe Routes to School Advisory Committee.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not the Draft EIR or CEQA. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-6
The commenter suggests including a policy to secure and maintain a Bicycle Friendly Communities designation, which would build on current momentum and sustain future efforts.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. However, as discussed on page 4.11-7 and 4.11-8 of the Draft EIR, the General Plan includes the following policies related to bicycle infrastructure and active transportation:
Policy MOB-1.1: Complete Streets. Maintain and update street standards that that serves not just automobile operations, but also multi-modal movement and adjacent land uses, including pedestrians, motorists, bicyclists, and transit riders of all ages and abilities, in a form that is compatible with and complementary to adjacent land uses, and promotes connectivity between uses and areas.
2-72
718
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Policy MOB-1.4: Development Review. Evaluate new development to ensure that the safety, comfort, and convenience of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users are given equal level of consideration to motor vehicle operators.
Policy MOB-1.7: Promote Walking and Bicycling. Promote walking and bicycling for transportation, recreation, and improvement of public health. Policy MOB-1.20: Bicycle Plan Funding. Include funding for the City's Bicycle Plan updates and bikeway improvements consistent with the Bicycle Plan in the City's transportation financing program and TIF, recognizing the multi-modal travel needs of the City. Policy MOB-1.22: Non-motorized Circulation System. Provide safe and direct pedestrian routes and bikeways between places.
Policy MOB-1.24: Bicycle Facilities. Bicycle facilities shall be provided to complete a continuous bikeway system, consistent with state standards, as shown on the Bikeway Plan Map. In cases where existing right of way constraints limit development of Class II or Class IV facilities, Class Ill signage and demarcation may be permitted at the discretion of the City Engineer. Deviations from these standards and from the routing shown on the diagram shall be permitted with the approval of the City Engineer.
Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-7
The commenter suggests including the recently released 5th Edition of Comprehensive Bike Guide by AASHTO into General Plan Policy MOB-1.2.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-8
The commenter suggests minor text edits to General Plan Policy MOB-1.4.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-8
The commenter suggests minor text edits to General Plan Policy MOB-1.4.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-9
The commenter suggests minor text edits to General Plan Policy MOB-1.7.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
2-73
719
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Response 7-10
The commenter suggests text edits to General Plan Policy MOB-1.9 to include mention of low-stress method for crossing for students walking and biking to school and other active transportation users.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-11
The commenter suggests minor text edits to General Plan Policy MOB-1.15.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-12
The commenter suggests minor text edits to General Plan Policy MOB-1.17.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-13
The commenter suggests text edits to General Plan Policy MOB-1.22 to include an intention to complete at least 50 percent of the planned bike and pedestrian network outlined in NVTA’s Active Transportation Plan by 2040.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-14
The commenter suggests text edits to General Plan Policy MOB-1.24 to include the provision of alternative low-stress routes rather than installing facilities that are not low-stress. The commenter also suggests the inclusion of review by the Open Space, Active Transportation, and Sustainability Commission.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-15
The commenter suggests minor text edits to General Plan Policy MOB-2.2.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
2-74
720
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Response 7-16
The commenter suggests minor text edits to General Plan Policy MOB-2.3.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-17
The commenter suggests text edits to General Plan Policy MOB-2.4 to upgrade existing bikeways using all means available—such as conflict markings, buffers, rumble strips, and delineators—to make bikeways safer and lower stress and to catch up with evolving best practices.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-18
The commenter suggests minor text edits to General Plan Policy MOB-2.5.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-19
The commenter proposes the addition of a new policy, MOB-2.7, which suggests partnership with public, nonprofit, and community stakeholders to secure dedicated funding for the education and infrastructure needs of the Countywide Safe Routes To School Partnership to provide safe and equitable access for students going by active transportation to local schools.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-20
The commenter proposes the addition of a new policy, MOB-1.29, which suggests that the City Secure and maintain status as a Bicycle Friendly Community.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-21
The commenter suggests minor text edits to General Plan Policy ENV-9.5.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
2-75
721
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Response 7-22
The commenter suggests text edits to General Plan Policy ENV-10.10 to include an intention to complete at least 50 percent of the planned bike and pedestrian network by 2040.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-23
The commenter suggests text edits to General Plan Policy ENV-11.9 to include an intention to complete at least 50 percent of the planned bike and pedestrian network by 2040.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-24
The commenter suggests updates to Figure 6: Standard Roadway Cross Sections to denote that 5’ bike lanes excluding gutter pan with 3’ buffers containing delineators are standard for bike lanes along all types of arterials and often for major collectors, too.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-25
The commenter suggests the inclusion of Types of Bikeways on page M-21 of the General Plan to include Class 2B bicycle lanes.
This comment pertains to the General Plan, but not to the Draft EIR or CEQA. Accordingly, City staff is considering edits to the General Plan goals and policies, as needed. Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 7-26
The commenter thanks the City for considering their suggested changes and emphasizes the Plan's significance in addressing the climate emergency and promoting Complete Streets. They urge a stronger commitment to the Plan's goals to empower the City to achieve the 2040 General Plan.
They also offer to answer any questions and express gratitude for the ongoing efforts on the Plan.
This comment is appreciated. No revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
2-76
722
Brent, the only comment on the EIR is for the City to acknowledge that the County has (i) general planned and rezoned the Hess-Laird properties for industrial use and (ii) the Napa ALUC has adopted a new ALUCP that modifies the treatment of the Hess-Laird properties, among other things.
Clark Morrison
Letter 8
8-1
2-77
723
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Letter 8
COMMENTER: Clark Morrison
DATE: December 30, 2024
Response 8-1
The commenter requests the City to acknowledge that the County has general planned and rezoned the Hess-Laird properties for industrial use and that the Napa ALUC has adopted a new ALUCP modifying the treatment of these properties.
As discussed on page 2-6 of the Draft EIR, the City would evaluate updating the Urban Limit Line to include the Hess/Laird Property, which would subsequently need to be incorporated into the City with a Napa County LAFCO sphere of influence amendment and annexation approval before any future development could occur in that area within the City limits. Because these lands are not within the City’s jurisdiction, the potential environmental impacts from future development in the Hess Laird Property will be addressed when or if the City pursues annexation of that area.
Consideration of expanding the Urban Limit Line would not result in an environmental impacts and is not discussed further in the Draft EIR. Accordingly, no revisions to the Draft EIR are required in response to this comment.
2-78
724
December 27, 2024
Mr. Brent Cooper, AICP
Community Development Director
City of American Canyon
4381 Broadway Street, Suite 201
American Canyon, CA 94503
RE: American Canyon 2040 General Plan – Draft Environmental Impact Report Comments Dear Brent:
Thank you for the opportunity to review and provide comments on the City of American Canyon General Plan 2040 Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). Our team has reviewed the document, and would like to share the following comments:
2.6 – Project Characteristics
− Pg. 2-10 – Under Section 2.6.5, first bullet, please add reference to safety and transit improvements for the SR 29 corridor
o Consider updating Figure 2-6 (Pg. 2-12) or adding a new Figure, to show proposed improvements identified in Section 2.6.5 and elsewhere in the DEIR for active transportation modes (including corridor and intersection improvements) and fixed route transit service
3.3 – Cumulative Development
− Pg. 3-2 – Under 4th paragraph, add language to clarify that cumulative impacts also include programs or policies implemented within the Planning Area that may not be tied to a specific development project. This is particularly relevant in the area of transportation (TDM programs, for example) as well as GHG reduction efforts (see in-progress Countywide RCAAP) Chapter 4.2 – Air Quality
− Pg. 4.20-17 – Under the Transportation section, NVTA is unclear as to why only two of the 23 Transportation-related Control Measures (CMs)identified in the 2017 CAP are discussed. o Several additional CMs , such as TR9 (Bicycle and Pedestrian Access and Facilities), TR3 (Local and Regional Bus Service), and TR15 (Public Outreach & Education) are consistent with proposed Mobility Element policies and existing programs supported by the City. o Related to TR2: Trip Reduction Programs, suggest that within the General Plan Mobility Element, creation of a new stand-alone Policy to explicitly reference public transit, including existing Vine fixed route and ACT on-demand transit systems. This would strengthen Plan consistency with this Control Measure, as well as that of AQ-2 discussed below.
Letter 9
9-1
9-2
9-3
2-79
725
− Pg. 4.2-22 – Reference to “VINE” fixed route public transit should be changed to “Vine” as the name is not used as an acronym. Change should be applied anywhere else Vine transit is referenced in the General Plan or the DEIR.
Chapter 4.3 – Biological Resources
− Pg. 4.3-22 – Related to Proposed ENV-1.5, consider revision to preceding paragraph to include discussion existing and/or future proposed active transportation facilities (paths/trails) through or adjacent to the “network of open spaces.”
Chapter 4.5 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions
− Pg. 4.5-14 – Napa Valley Transportation Authority – Please revise second sentence to replace “county transportation plan” with “countywide transportation plan.” Make this same change in the final sentence of the paragraph.
Chapter 4.6 – Land Use & Planning
− Pg. 4.6-4 – Suggest change in leading paragraph, modifying second sentence from “…and transportation strategies that, if implemented, would allow the region to meet CARB’s targets,” to “…would support regional efforts to meet…”
o Addititionally, under subsection c., Local Regulations, consider updating discussion to reflect Plan Bay Area 2050+, a limited and focused update to Plan Bay Area 2050. o Update other references in the DEIR to Plan Bay Area 2050 to reflect same (eg: 4.11-4).
Chapter 4.7 – Noise
− Pg. 4.7-19 – Related to Program C: Active Transportation Plan, as well as prior references in the DEIR to Policy MOB-1.20, Bicycle Plan Funding, consider updating this Program/Policy in the General Plan document to reflect City coordination with NVTA in developing a locally-adopted Active Transportation Plan. This comment will also be provided as part of stand-alone comments on the Draft General Plan.
Chapter 4.11 - Transportation
− Pg. 4.11-1 – Last paragraph. Note that NVTA will provide City with updated mileage totals for existing bicycle/pedestrian facilities in January of 2025, reflecting updated methodologies as well as newly constructed facilities subsequent to the 2019 Bicycle Plan. If schedules allow, consider updating distances prior to publication of the FEIR and adoption of the 2040 General Plan. Also, correct double comma on 3rd line of paragraph. − 4.11-2 – Transit Services. Add to existing paragraph reference to Regional transit routes 11 (Napa Vallejo Connector) and 11x (Napa Vallejo Express), providing American Canyon residents public transit service North to the City of Napa, and South to the Vallejo Ferry Terminal. − 4.11-2 – Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 – Update discussion to reflect 2023 Final Rule published by the Access Board in the Federal Register addressing access improvements within the public ROW. See Federal Register, Vol 88, No. 151, Tuesday, Aug 8 2023, pp53604 et seq. 9-4
9-5
9-6
9-7
9-8
9-9
9-10
9-11
2-80
726
− 4.11-3 – Federal Highway Administration – Update discussion to reflect that FHWA funding authorization is Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), commonly known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), not MAP 21.
− 4.11-3 – Complete Streets Act – Update discussion to reflect Caltrans Directors Policy 37. See also SB 960 (Weiner, 2024).
− 4.11-4 – Senate Bill 743 – Second Paragraph, update reference to OPR (Office of Planning & Research) to reflect new name for the state’s comprehensive planning agency, Office of Land Use & Climate Innovation (LCI).
NVTA will be providing a separate set of comments on the Draft General Plan (as separate and distinct from the DEIR) in the coming days. Those comments will largely focus on opportunities to strengthen or clarify proposed policies and discussion of existing conditions.
Thank you again for the opportunity to provide comments. Should you or your team have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to reach out.
Regards,
Patrick Band
Associate Planner/Administrator
Napa Valley Transportation Authority
ON BEHALF OF NVTA
9-12
9-13
9-14
9-15
2-81
727
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Letter 9
COMMENTER: Patrick Band, Associated Planner/Administrator – Napa Valley Transportation Authority
DATE: December 27, 2024
Response 9-1
The commenter requests a reference to safety and transit improvements for the State Route 29 corridor is added to Section 2.6, Project Characteristics, of the Draft EIR. The commenter requests an updated Figure 2-6 or new figure to show proposed improvements identified in Section 2.6.5 and elsewhere in the Draft EIR for active transportation modes and fixed route services.
Section 4.11, Transportation, provides a detailed description of existing pedestrian bicycle, and transit facilities that serve American Canyon and therefore revisions to Figure 2-6 or additional figures identifying active transportation modes and fixed route services are not warranted. In response to the comment regarding safety and transit improvements on State Route 29, the following revision has been made to the Draft EIR Section 2.6.5, Mobility Updates. The revision would not alter the impact analysis or findings of the Draft EIR and, as such, would not warrant recirculation of the Draft EIR.
The City is in partnership with the Napa Valley Transportation Authority to identify improvements to SR 29, including landscaping improvements, pedestrian improvements, safety and transit movements, and multimodal features.
Response 9-2
The commenter requests language is added to the fourth paragraph of page 3-2 to clarify cumulative impacts include programs or policies that are not tied to a specific development project.
In response to this comment, the following revision has been made to the Draft EIR Section 3.3, Cumulative Development. The revision would not alter the impact analysis or findings of the Draft EIR and, as such, would not warrant recirculation of the Draft EIR.
By its nature, a general plan considers cumulative impacts insofar as it considers cumulative development that could occur within the Planning Area, including implementation of programs and policies included in regional planning documents.
Response 9-3
The commenter requests additional transportation-related control measures (i.e., TR9, TR3, TR15, and TR2) identified in the 2017 Climate Action Plan are discussed in page 4.2-17. The commenter suggests that within the General Plan Mobility Element, a new policy should be created to explicitly reference public transit which would strengthen consistency with TR2 and the analysis of Impact AQ-2.
The Draft EIR concluded that the 2040 General Plan Update would have less than significant impacts related to conflicts with an air quality plan and release of cumulatively considerable criteria pollutants. The commenter states the listed transportation-related control measures would be consistent with the proposed Mobility Element policies. Therefore, further evaluation of these transportation-related control measures would not identify new or more severe environmental 2-82
728
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
impacts related to conflicts with an air quality plan. The commenter’s suggestion pertaining to the inclusion of an additional General Plan policy is not directly related to the analysis within the Draft EIR. As stated, the Draft EIR concluded that the 2040 General Plan Update would have less than significant impacts related to conflicts with an air quality plan and release of cumulatively considerable criteria pollutants, and therefore the inclusion of an additional policy to the General Plan would not substantially reduce environmental impacts to a lower level of significance.
Therefore, no revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 9-4
The commenter requests the use of “VINE” on page 4.2-22 is changed to “Vine”.
The use of “VINE” on Page 4.2-22 of the Draft EIR is language from Policy MOB-5.3 of the 2040 General Plan Update. Therefore, this comment does not pertain directly to the Draft EIR. No revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 9-5
The commenter requests a revision to page 4.3-22 that includes a discussion of existing and future proposed active transportation facilities through or adjacent to the “network of open spaces”.
as the Napa River Bay Trail, Napa County Parks and Open Space District, and Wetlands Edge Park. At this time, specifics on the routes of active transportation facilities such as trails through open spaces are not defined. The creation of any active transportation facilities would be subject to environmental review separate of the Draft EIR. No revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 9-6
The commenter requests the language in the Napa Valley Transportation Authority discussion on page 4.5-14 is revised to replace “county transportation plan” with “countywide transportation plan”.
In response to this comment, the following revision has been made to the Draft EIR Sub-Section 4.5.2, Regulatory Setting, in Section 4.5, Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The revision would not alter the impact analysis or findings of the Draft EIR and, as such, would not warrant recirculation of the Draft EIR.
NVTA also develops the long-range countywide transportation plan, which (along with similar plans from the other eight Bay Area counties) forms the “primary basis” for the RTP/SCS adopted by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. In turn, the countywide transportation plan must consider the most recently adopted RTP/SCS to assure that both plans employ a common planning framework.
2-83
729
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Response 9-7
The commenter requests the language in the leading paragraph on page 4.6-4 is revised to state “would allow the region” to “would support regional efforts”. The commenter requests a discussion of the regional transportation plan/sustainable communities strategy is updated to reflect Plan Bay Area 2050+.
CEQA Guidelines 15125(a) state, generally, a lead agency should describe physical environmental conditions as they exist at the time the notice of preparation if published. The notice of preparation for the Draft EIR was released in July 2022 for public review. As of March 2025, Plan Bay Area 2050+ has not yet been adopted by the Association of Bay Area Governments and therefore did not represent baseline conditions used for evaluation of environmental impacts within the Draft EIR. No revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
In response to the commenter’s request regarding language revisions, the following revision has been made to the Draft EIR Sub-Section 4.6.2, Regulatory Setting, in Section 4.6, Land Use and Planning. The revision would not alter the impact analysis or findings of the Draft EIR and, as such, would not warrant recirculation of the Draft EIR.
Each of the regions must prepare a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), as an integral part of its regional transportation plan, that contains land use, housing, and transportation strategies that, if implemented, would allow the region support regional efforts to meet CARB’s targets.
Response 9-8
The commenter requests that on Page 4.7-19 Program C as well as prior references to Policy MOB1.20 is updated in the General Plan to reflect City coordination with Napa Valley Transportation Authority in developing a locally-adopted Active Transportation Plan.
This comment pertains to the preparation of the 2040 General Plan Update but does not pertain directly to the Draft EIR. No revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment.
Response 9-9
The commenter requests the distances in the last paragraph on page 4.11-1 are updated to reflect updated methodologies provided from Napa Valley Transportation Authority in January 2025. In addition, the commenter requests the double comma on the 3rd line of the paragraph is corrected.
CEQA Guidelines 15125(a) state, generally, a lead agency should describe physical environmental conditions as they exist at the time the notice of preparation if published. The notice of preparation for the Draft EIR was released in July 2022 for public review and therefore baseline conditions are reflective of 2022 existing conditions. No changes to the Draft EIR are required.
In response to the commenter’s request regarding grammar revisions, the following revision has been made to the Draft EIR Section 4.11.1(b), Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities. The revision would not alter the impact analysis or findings of the Draft EIR and, as such, would not warrant recirculation of the Draft EIR.
While most of the City has sidewalks, , several older neighborhoods of the City have limited or lack pedestrian infrastructure.
2-84
730
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Response 9-10
The commenter requests references to regional transit routes 11 and 11x are added to the paragraph on transit services on page 4.11-2.
In response to the commenter’s request, the following revision has been made to the Draft EIR Section 4.11.1(c), Transit Services. The revision would not alter the impact analysis or findings of the Draft EIR and, as such, would not warrant recirculation of the Draft EIR.
Vine Transit’s Route 29 (Napa-BART) Express connects the BART Station in El Cerrito to the Redwood Park-n-Ride in the City of Napa and stops in American Canyon at the Post Office on Crawford Way. In addition, Transit Route 11 (the Napa Vallejo Connector) and 11x (Napa Vallejo Express), provides public transit services north to the city of Napa and south to the Vallejo Ferry Terminal.
Response 9-11
The commenter requests the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 discussion on page 4.11-2 is updated to reflect the 2023 Final Rule addressing access improvements within the public right-ofway.
In response to the commenter’s request, the following revision has been made to the Draft EIR SubSection 4.11.2, Regulatory Setting, Page 4.11-2 of Section 4.11, Transportation. The revision would not alter the impact analysis or findings of the Draft EIR and, as such, would not warrant recirculation of the Draft EIR.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 provides comprehensive rights and protections to individuals with disabilities. The goal of the ADA is to assure equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency for people with disabilities. To implement this goal, the United States Access Board, an independent Federal agency created in 1973 to ensure accessibility for people with disabilities, has created accessibility guidelines for public rights-of-way. While these guidelines have not been formally adopted, they have been widely followed by jurisdictions and agencies nationwide in the last decade. The guidelines, last revised in July 2011, address various issues, including roadway design practices, slope and terrain issues, pedestrian access to streets, sidewalks, curb ramps, street furnishings, pedestrian signals, parking, and other components of public rights-of-way.
The guidelines were updated in August 2023 to address accessibility guidelines for pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way. These guidelines inform federal, state, and local government agencies on how to make their pedestrian facilities, such as sidewalks, crosswalks, shared use paths, and on-street parking, accessible to people with disabilities. The guidelines cover the minimum scoping and technical requirements for various spaces and elements in the public right-of-way, such as pedestrian access routes, accessible pedestrian signals, curb ramps, detectable warning surfaces, crosswalks at roundabouts, on-street parking, transit stops. The guidelines apply to all proposed roadways in the City.
2-85
731
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Response 9-12
The commenter requests the Federal Highway Administration discussion on page 4.11-3 is updated to reflect that funding authorization is Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, not MAP 21.
In response to the commenter’s request, the following revision has been made to the Draft EIR SubSection 4.11.2, Regulatory Setting, Page 4.11-3 of Section 4.11, Transportation. The revision would not alter the impact analysis or findings of the Draft EIR and, as such, would not warrant recirculation of the Draft EIR.
FHWA funding is provided through the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). MAP-21 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act can be used to fund local transportation improvement projects, such as projects to improve the efficiency of existing roadways, traffic signal coordination, bikeways, and transit system upgrades.
Response 9-13
The commenter requests the Complete Streets Act discussion on page 4.11-3 is updated to reflect Caltrans Directors Policy 37 and Senate Bill 960.
Please see Response 4-7 for text included to address Caltrans Directors Policy 37. In response to the commenter’s request, the following revision has been made to the Draft EIR Sub-Section 4.11.2, Regulatory Setting, Page 4.11-3 of Section 4.11, Transportation. The revision would not alter the impact analysis or findings of the Draft EIR and, as such, would not warrant recirculation of the Draft EIR.
In 2024, Senate Bill 960 was enacted to further enhance the implementation of Complete Streets policies. This bill requires all transportation projects funded or overseen by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to provide comfortable, convenient, and connected complete streets facilities unless an exemption is documented and approved. SB 960 mandates that the asset management plan prioritize the implementation of facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users on all applicable projects.
Response 9-14
The commenter requests the Senate Bill 743 discussion on page 4.11-4 is updated to reflect the new name for the Office of Planning and Research, now the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation.
In response to the commenter’s request, the following revision has been made to the Draft EIR Sub-Section 4.11.2, Regulatory Setting, Page 4.11-4 of Section 4.11, Transportation. The revision would not alter the impact analysis or findings of the Draft EIR and, as such, would not warrant recirculation of the Draft EIR.
In December 2018, Office of Planning and Research (OPR; now known as Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation) released the final update to CEQA Guidelines consistent with SB 743 that went into effect statewide on July 1, 2020, which state that vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is “generally” the most appropriate metric of transportation impacts to align local environmental review under CEQA with California’s long-term greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals. 2-86
732
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
Response 9-15
The commenter states the Napa Valley Transportation Authority will be providing a separate set of comments on the Draft General Plan and thanks the City for the opportunity to provide comments.
This comment pertains to the preparation of the 2040 General Plan Update but does not pertain directly to the Draft EIR. No revisions to the Draft EIR are necessary in response to this comment. 2-87
733
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
This page intentionally left blank.
2-88
734
Minor Revisions to the Draft EIR
Final Environmental Impact Report 3-1
Minor Revisions to the Draft EIR
This chapter presents specific text changes made to the DEIR since its publication and public review.
The changes are presented in the order in which they appear in the original Draft EIR and are identified by the Draft EIR page number. Text deletions are shown in strikethrough, and text additions are shown in underline. The information contained within this chapter clarifies and expands on information in the Draft EIR and does not constitute “significant new information” requiring recirculation, as described in Section 4, Recirculation Not Warranted.
3.1 Revisions to the Draft EIR
Project Description
The following text has been revised on page 2-10 of Sub-Section 2.6.5, Mobility Updates, of Section 2, Project Description.
The City is in partnership with the Napa Valley Transportation Authority to identify improvements to SR 29, including landscaping improvements, pedestrian improvements, safety and transit movements, and multimodal features.
Environmental Setting
The following text has been revised on page 3-2 of Sub-Section 3.3, Cumulative Development, of Section 3, Environmental Setting.
By its nature, a general plan considers cumulative impacts insofar as it considers cumulative development that could occur within the Planning Area, including implementation of programs and policies included in regional planning documents.
Biological Resources
The following text has been revised on pages 4.3-3 and 4.3-14 of Section 4.4, Biological Resources.
Impact BIO-1 THE RESULTS OF THESE SCIENTIFIC DATABASE QUERIES ARE PROVIDED AS REVISED APPENDIX B OF THIS EIR. THERE ARE 51 52 PLANT SPECIES AND 44 45 ANIMAL SPECIES WITH POTENTIAL
TO OCCUR WITHIN THE PLANNING AREA WHICH MEET AT LEAST ONE OF THE CRITERIA FOR A SPECIAL
STATUS SPECIES, DESCRIBED ABOVE (REVISED APPENDIX B)THE PROJECT COULD HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES. IMPLEMENTATION OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND POLICIES, AS WELL AS MITIGATION MEASURES BIO-1 AND BIO-2 THROUGH BIO-9, WOULD ENSURE DEVELOPMENT FACILITATED BY THE PROJECT WOULD NOT HAVE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON CANDIDATE, SENSITIVE, OR SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES. THIS IMPACT WOULD BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITH MITIGATION.
735
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
3-2
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The following text has been revised on page 4.5-14 within Sub-Section 4.5.2, Regulatory Setting, in Section 4.5, Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
NVTA also develops the long-range countywide transportation plan, which (along with similar plans from the other eight Bay Area counties) forms the “primary basis” for the RTP/SCS adopted by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. In turn, the countywide transportation plan must consider the most recently adopted RTP/SCS to assure that both plans employ a common planning framework.
Land Use and Planning
The following text has been revised on page 4.6-4 within Sub-Section 4.6.2, Regulatory Setting, in Section 4.6, Land Use and Planning.
Each of the regions must prepare a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), as an integral part of its regional transportation plan, that contains land use, housing, and transportation strategies that, if implemented, would allow the region support regional efforts to meet CARB’s targets.
Transportation
The following text has been revised on page 4.11-1 within Sub-Section 4.11.1(b), Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities, in Section 4.11, Transportation.
While most of the City has sidewalks, , several older neighborhoods of the City have limited or lack pedestrian infrastructure.
The following text has been revised on page 4.11-2 within Sub- Section 4.11.1(a), Federal Regulations, in Section 4.11, Transportation.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 provides comprehensive rights and protections to individuals with disabilities. The goal of the ADA is to assure equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency for people with disabilities. To implement this goal, the United States Access Board, an independent Federal agency created in 1973 to ensure accessibility for people with disabilities, has created accessibility guidelines for public rights-of-way. While these guidelines have not been formally adopted, they have been widely followed by jurisdictions and agencies nationwide in the last decade. The guidelines, last revised in July 2011, address various issues, including roadway design practices, slope and terrain issues, pedestrian access to streets, sidewalks, curb ramps, street furnishings, pedestrian signals, parking, and other components of public rights-of-way.
The guidelines were updated in August 2023 to address accessibility guidelines for pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way. These guidelines inform federal, state, and local government agencies on how to make their pedestrian facilities, such as sidewalks, crosswalks, shared use paths, and on-street parking, accessible to people with disabilities. The guidelines cover the minimum scoping and technical requirements for various spaces and elements in the public right-of-way, such as pedestrian access routes, accessible pedestrian signals, curb ramps, detectable warning surfaces, crosswalks at roundabouts, on-street parking, transit stops. The guidelines apply to all proposed roadways in the City.
736
Minor Revisions to the Draft EIR
Final Environmental Impact Report 3-3
The following text has been revised on page 4.11-2 within Sub- Section 4.11.1(c), Transit Services, in Section 4.11, Transportation.
Vine Transit’s Route 29 (Napa-BART) Express connects the BART Station in El Cerrito to the Redwood Park-n-Ride in the City of Napa and stops in American Canyon at the Post Office on Crawford Way. In addition, Transit Route 11 (the Napa Vallejo Connector) and 11x (Napa Vallejo Express), provides public transit services north to the city of Napa and south to the Vallejo Ferry Terminal.
The following text has been revised within Sub-Section 4.11.2, Regulatory Setting, Page 4.11-3 of Section 4.11, Transportation.
FHWA funding is provided through the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). MAP-21 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act can be used to fund local transportation improvement projects, such as projects to improve the efficiency of existing roadways, traffic signal coordination, bikeways, and transit system upgrades.
The following text has been revised within Sub-Section 4.11.2, Regulatory Setting, Page 4.11-3 of Section 4.11, Transportation.
Caltrans District 4 Pedestrian Plan
The Caltrans District 4 Pedestrian Plan, released in 2021, is a comprehensive guide aimed at improving pedestrian infrastructure across the nine-county Bay Area. This plan identifies existing conditions and prioritizes location-based needs to enhance pedestrian safety and accessibility. Developed in collaboration with local agencies, advocates, and the public, the plan serves as a crucial reference for planners and project designers. It promotes alternatives to driving, aiming to reduce congestion, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and encourage healthier lifestyles. The plan is part of the broader Bay Area Active Transportation Plan, which integrates pedestrian and bicycle needs into a cohesive strategy.
Caltrans District 4 Bike Plan
The Caltrans District 4 Bike Plan, finalized in 2018, evaluates the bicycling needs across the Bay Area's state transportation network. This plan identifies and prioritizes infrastructure improvements to enhance bicycle safety, mobility, and accessibility. It builds on the 2017 California State Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan and aims to create an integrated bicycle network that supports safe and convenient cycling for all ages and abilities. The plan was developed with input from the public and collaboration with local and regional partners, ensuring that proposed improvements align with local networks and address barriers to cycling.
Complete Streets Act
The California Complete Streets Act (AB 1358) adopted in 2008, requires that cities and other public agencies incorporate “Complete Street” policies when updating their General Plan Circulation Element. The term “Complete Streets” refers to a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets, including bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, motorists, movers of commercial goods, pedestrians, public transportation, and seniors. A “Complete Street” is one that provides safe and convenient travel 737
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
3-4
in a manner that is suitable to the local context. Complete Streets make travel safe for all users, including bicyclists, pedestrians, motorists, transit vehicles, and people of all ages and abilities.
Each street does not need to provide dedicated space to all users, but the network must accommodate the needs of all users.
In 2021, Caltrans adopted Director’s Policy 37, a policy directive related to nonmotorized travel throughout the State. Director’s Policy 37 states:
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) recognizes that walking, biking, transit, and passenger rail are integral to our vision of delivering a brighter future for all through a world-class transportation network. Additionally, Caltrans recognizes that streets are not only used for transportation but are also valuable community spaces.
Accordingly, in locations with current and/or future pedestrian, bicycle, or transit needs, all transportation projects funded or overseen by Caltrans will provide comfortable, convenient, and connected complete streets facilities for people walking, biking, and taking transit or passenger rail unless an exception is documented and approved. When decisions are made not to include complete streets elements in capital and maintenance projects, the justification will be documented with final approval by the responsible District Director. Opportunities for complete streets exist in all phases of project development from planning and design to construction, operations, and maintenance. Complete streets projects should prioritize underserved communities that have been historically harmed and segmented by the transportation network and should serve people of all ages and abilities. Furthermore, Caltrans commits to removing unnecessary policy and procedural barriers and partnering with communities and agencies to ensure projects on local and state transportation systems improve the connectivity to existing and planned pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities, and accessibility to existing and planned destinations, where possible.
In 2024, Senate Bill 960 was enacted to further enhance the implementation of Complete Streets policies. This bill requires all transportation projects funded or overseen by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to provide comfortable, convenient, and connected complete streets facilities unless an exemption is documented and approved. SB 960 mandates that the asset management plan prioritize the implementation of facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users on all applicable projects.
The following text has been revised within Sub-Section 4.11.2, Regulatory Setting, Page 4.11-4 of Section 4.11, Transportation.
In December 2018, Office of Planning and Research (OPR; now known as Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation) released the final update to CEQA Guidelines consistent with SB 743 that went into effect statewide on July 1, 2020, which state that vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is “generally” the most appropriate metric of transportation impacts to align local environmental review under CEQA with California’s long-term greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals. 738
Recirculation Not Warranted
Final Environmental Impact Report 4-1
Recirculation Not Warranted
As presented in Chapter 3, Minor Revisions to the Draft EIR, minor revisions to the Draft EIR would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts. The Minor Revisions (Chapter 3) identifies textual modifications to the Final EIR.
The revised text serves to amplify, correct, supplement or clarify, information in the public review Draft EIR. It does not substantively affect the level of impact nor the conclusions presented.
Therefore, recirculation of the Draft EIR is not warranted.
CEQA requires recirculation of a Draft EIR only when “significant new information” is added to a Draft EIR after public notice of the availability of the Draft EIR has occurred but before the EIR is certified (Public Resources Code Section 21092.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5). Recirculation is not required where the new information added to the EIR merely clarifies or amplifies or makes insignificant modifications in an adequate EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5(b)).
The relevant portions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 (items a, b and e) read as follows:
(a) A lead agency is required to recirculate an EIR when significant new information is added to the EIR after public notice is given of the availability of the draft EIR for public review under Section 15087 but before certification. As used in this section, the term “information” can include changes in the project or environmental setting as well as additional data or other information. New information added to an EIR is not “significant” unless the EIR is changed in a way that deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of the project or a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect (including a feasible project alternative) that the project’s proponents have declined to implement. “Significant new information” requiring recirculation include, for example, a disclosure showing that:
1) A new significant environmental impact would result from the project or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be implemented.
2) A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result unless mitigation measures are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance. 3) A feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the environmental impacts of the project, but the project’s proponents decline to adopt it.
4) The draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded. (b) Recirculation is not required where the new information added to the EIR merely clarifies or amplifies or makes insignificant modifications in an adequate EIR. (e) A decision not to recirculate an EIR must be supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record.
The revisions to Section 4.3, Biological Resources, refine Impact BIO-1 by clarifying its inclusion of mitigation measures BIO-1 through BIO-9. These mitigation measures were already included within the impact analysis and these revisions correct a typographical error. Recirculation is not required where new information added to the EIR merely clarifies or amplifies or makes minor modifications in an EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5(b)). Additionally, the Revised Appendix Item B of the 739
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
4-2
Draft EIR to update the special status species table would not result in new significant impacts to special status species or require updated mitigation, as the current EIR sufficiently covers these revisions. Revisions to Section 4.3, Biological Resources, clarify and amplify the standards established by these measures and they would not result in any secondary or otherwise undisclosed effect.
Revisions to Section 4.11, Transportation, clarify and amplify the established standards for project oversight and compliance. These edits would not result in any secondary or otherwise undisclosed effect. As discussed above, recirculation is not required where new information added to the EIR merely makes minor modifications in an EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5(b)). Therefore, the revisions to the regulatory setting of Section 4.11, Transportation, consistent of minor modifications to the EIR.
The information and revised wording of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 added to this Final EIR would not result in a substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact, nor a new significant environmental impact that would result from the revised mitigation. The addition of an updated special status species table in Section 4.3, Biological Resources, and updated language in Section 4.11, Transportation, would not result in an impact that deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of the project or a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect. Finally, additional information provided in this Final EIR does not present a feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from others previously analyzed in the EIR that the City has declined to adopt and that would lessen an environmental impact.
The information added to this Final EIR supplements, clarifies, amplifies, and corrects information in the Draft EIR. The City has reviewed the information in the Minor Revisions and has determined that it does not change any of the basic findings or conclusions of the EIR, does not constitute “significant new information” pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5, and does not require recirculation of the Draft EIR. This decision is supported by substantial evidence provided in this EIR. 740
Revised Appendix B
Special Status Species
741
742
Special Status Species
Final Environmental Impact Report B-1
Special Status Species
Scientific Name
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Plants and Lichens
Allium peninsulare var. franciscanum
Franciscan onion
None/None
G5T2/S2
1B.2
Perennial bulbiferous herb. Cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland. Clay, Serpentinite (often), volcanic. Elevations: 170-1000ft. (52-305m.) Blooms (Apr)May-Jun.
Amorpha californica var. napensis
Napa false indigo
None/None
G4T2/S2
1B.2
Perennial deciduous shrub. Broadleafed upland forest, chaparral, cismontane woodland. Openings in forest or woodland or in chaparral. 30-735 m. Elevations: 165-6560ft. (50-2000m.) Blooms Apr-Jul.
Astragalus tener var. tener
alkali milk-vetch
None/None
G2T1/S1
1B.2
Annual herb. Playas, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Alkaline. Elevations: 5-195ft. (1-60m.) Blooms MarJun.
Atriplex persistens
vernal pool smallscale
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Annual herb. Vernal pools. Alkaline vernal pools. Elevations: 35-375ft. (10-115m.) Blooms Jun-Oct.
Balsamorhiza macrolepis
big-scale balsamroot
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Perennial herb. Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland. Serpentinite (sometimes).
Elevations: 150-5100ft. (45-1555m.) Blooms Mar-Jun.
Blennosperma bakeri
Sonoma sunshine
FE/SCE
G1/S1
1B.1
Annual herb. Valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Vernal pools and swales. Elevations: 35-360ft. (10-110m.) Blooms Mar-May.
Blepharizonia plumosa
big tarplant
None/None
G1G2/S1S2
1B.1
Annual herb. Valley and foothill grassland. Clay (usually). Elevations: 100-1655ft. (30-505m.) Blooms Jul-Oct.
Brodiaea leptandra
narrow-anthered brodiaea
None/None
G3?/S3?
1B.2
Perennial bulbiferous herb. Broadleafed upland forest, chaparral, cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest, valley and foothill grassland. Volcanic. Elevations: 360-3000ft. (110-915m.) Blooms May-Jul.
Calochortus pulchellus
Mt. Diablo fairy-lantern
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Perennial bulbiferous herb. Chaparral, cismontane woodland, riparian woodland, valley and foothill grassland. On wooded and brushy slopes. Elevations: 100-2755ft. (30-840m.) Blooms Apr-Jun.
Carex lyngbyei
Lyngbye's sedge
None/None
G5/S3
2B.2
Perennial rhizomatous herb. Marshes and swamps. Elevations: 0-35ft. (0-10m.) Blooms Apr-Aug. 743
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
B-2
Scientific Name
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Castilleja affinis var. neglecta
Tiburon paintbrush
FE/SCT
G4G5T1T2/S1S2
1B.2
Perennial herb (hemiparasitic). Valley and foothill grassland. Rocky serpentine sites. Elevations: 195-1310ft. (60- 400m.) Blooms Apr-Jun.
Ceanothus confusus
Rincon Ridge ceanothus
None/None
G1/S1
1B.1
Perennial evergreen shrub. Chaparral, cismontane woodland, closed-cone coniferous forest. Serpentinite (sometimes), volcanic (sometimes). Elevations: 245-3495ft. (75-1065m.) Blooms Feb-Jun.
Ceanothus purpureus
holly-leaved ceanothus
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Perennial evergreen shrub. Chaparral, cismontane woodland. Rocky, volcanic. Elevations: 395-2100ft. (120-640m.) Blooms Feb-Jun.
Ceanothus sonomensis
Sonoma ceanothus
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Perennial evergreen shrub. Chaparral. Sandy, serpentine or volcanic soils. Elevations: 705-2625ft. (215-800m.) Blooms Feb-Apr.
Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii
Congdon's tarplant
None/None
G3T1T2/S1S2
1B.1
Annual herb. Valley and foothill grassland. Alkaline soils, sometimes described as heavy white clay. Elevations: 0- 755ft. (0-230m.) Blooms May-Oct(Nov).
Centromadia parryi ssp. parryi
pappose tarplant
None/None
G3T2/S2
1B.2
Annual herb. Chaparral, coastal prairie, marshes and swamps, meadows and seeps, valley and foothill grassland.
Alkaline (often). Elevations: 0-1380ft. (0-420m.) Blooms May-Nov.
Chloropyron molle ssp. molle
soft salty bird's-beak
FE/SCR
G2T1/S1
1B.2
Annual herb (hemiparasitic). Marshes and swamps. In coastal salt marsh with Distichlis, Salicornia, Frankenia, etc.
Elevations: 0-10ft. (0-3m.) Blooms Jun-Nov.
Cicuta maculata var. bolanderi
Bolander's water-hemlock
None/None
G5T4T5/S2?
2B.1
Perennial herb. Marshes and swamps. In fresh or brackish water. Elevations: 0-655ft. (0-200m.) Blooms Jul-Sep.
Cirsium hydrophilum var.
hydrophilum
Suisun thistle
FE/None
G2T1/S1
1B.1
Perennial herb. Marshes and swamps. Grows with Scirpus, Distichlis near small watercourses within saltmarsh.
Elevations: 0-5ft. (0-1m.) Blooms Jun-Sep.
Dirca occidentalis
western leatherwood
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Perennial deciduous shrub. Broadleafed upland forest, chaparral, cismontane woodland, closed-cone coniferous forest, north coast coniferous forest, riparian forest, riparian woodland. On brushy slopes, mesic sites; mostly in mixed evergreen and foothill woodland communities. Elevations: 80-1395ft. (25-425m.) Blooms Jan-Mar(Apr).
Downingia pusilla
dwarf downingia
None/None
GU/S2
2B.2
Annual herb. Valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Vernal lake and pool margins with a variety of associates.
In several types of vernal pools. Elevations: 5-1460ft. (1-445m.) Blooms Mar-May. 744
Special Status Species
Final Environmental Impact Report B-3
Scientific Name
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Erigeron greenei
Greene's narrow-leaved daisy
None/None
G3/S3
1B.2
Perennial herb. Chaparral. Serpentine and volcanic substrates, generally in shrubby vegetation. Elevations: 260- 3295ft. (80-1005m.) Blooms May-Sep.
Eriogonum truncatum
Mt. Diablo buckwheat
None/None
G1/S1
1B.1
Annual herb. Chaparral, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland. Dry, exposed clay or sandy substrates.
Elevations: 10-1150ft. (3-350m.) Blooms Apr-Sep(Nov-Dec).
Eryngium jepsonii
Jepson's coyote-thistle
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Perennial herb. Valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Clay. Elevations: 10-985ft. (3-300m.) Blooms Apr-Aug.
Extriplex joaquinana
San Joaquin spearscale
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Annual herb. Chenopod scrub, meadows and seeps, playas, valley and foothill grassland. In seasonal alkali wetlands or alkali sink scrub with Distichlis spicata, Frankenia, etc. Elevations: 5-2740ft. (1-835m.) Blooms Apr-Oct.
Fritillaria liliacea
fragrant fritillary
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Perennial bulbiferous herb. Cismontane woodland, coastal prairie, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland.
Often on serpentine; various soils reported though usually on clay, in grassland. Elevations: 10-1345ft. (3-410m.) Blooms Feb-Apr.
Helianthella castanea
Diablo helianthella
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Perennial herb. Broadleafed upland forest, chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, riparian woodland, valley and foothill grassland. Azonal soils, Partial shade (often), rocky (usually). Elevations: 195-4265ft. (60- 1300m.) Blooms Mar-Jun.
Hemizonia congesta ssp. congesta
congested-headed hayfield tarplant
None/None
G5T2/S2
1B.2
Annual herb. Valley and foothill grassland. Grassy valleys and hills, often in fallow fields; sometimes along roadsides. Elevations: 65-1835ft. (20-560m.) Blooms Apr-Nov.
Hesperolinon bicarpellatum
two-carpellate western flax
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Annual herb. Chaparral. Serpentine barrens at edge of chaparral. Elevations: 195-3295ft. (60-1005m.) Blooms (Apr)May-Jul.
Hesperolinon breweri
Brewer's western flax
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Annual herb. Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland. Often in rocky serpentine soil in serpentine chaparral and serpentine grassland. Elevations: 100-3100ft. (30-945m.) Blooms May-Jul.
Horkelia tenuiloba
thin-lobed horkelia
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Perennial herb. Broadleafed upland forest, chaparral, valley and foothill grassland. Sandy soils; mesic openings.
Elevations: 165-1640ft. (50-500m.) Blooms May-Jul(Aug).
Isocoma arguta
Carquinez goldenbush
None/None
G1/S1
1B.1
Perennial shrub. Valley and foothill grassland. Alkaline soils, flats, lower hills. On low benches near drainages and on tops and sides of mounds in swale habitat. Elevations: 5-65ft. (1-20m.) Blooms Aug-Dec. 745
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
B-4
Scientific Name
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Lasthenia conjugens
Contra Costa goldfields
FE/None
G1/S1
1B.1
Annual herb. Cismontane woodland, playas, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Vernal pools, swales, low depressions, in open grassy areas. Elevations: 0-1540ft. (0-470m.) Blooms Mar-Jun.
Lathyrus jepsonii var. jepsonii
Delta tule pea
None/None
G5T2/S2
1B.2
Perennial herb. Marshes and swamps. In freshwater and brackish marshes. Often found with Typha, Aster lentus, Rosa californica, Juncus spp., Scirpus, etc. Usually on marsh and slough edges. Elevations: 0-15ft. (0-5m.) Blooms May-Jul(Aug-Sep).
Legenere limosa
legenere
None/None
G2/S2
1B.1
Annual herb. Vernal pools. In beds of vernal pools. 1-. Elevations: 5-2885ft. (1-880m.) Blooms Apr-Jun.
Leptosiphon jepsonii
Jepson's leptosiphon
None/None
G2G3/S2S3
1B.2
Annual herb. Chaparral, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland. Open to partially shaded grassy slopes. On volcanics or the periphery of serpentine substrates. Elevations: 330-1640ft. (100-500m.) Blooms MarMay.
Lilaeopsis masonii
Mason's lilaeopsis
None/SCR
G2/S2
1B.1
Perennial rhizomatous herb. Marshes and swamps, riparian scrub. Tidal zones, in muddy or silty soil formed through river deposition or river bank erosion. In brackish or freshwater. Elevations: 0-35ft. (0-10m.) Blooms AprNov.
Limosella australis
Delta mudwort
None/None
G4G5/S2
2B.1
Perennial stoloniferous herb. Marshes and swamps, riparian scrub. Usually on mud banks of the Delta in marshy or scrubby riparian associations; often with Lilaeopsis masonii. Elevations: 0-10ft. (0-3m.) Blooms May-Aug.
Lomatium repostum
Napa lomatium
None/None
G2G3/S2S3
1B.2
Perennial herb. Chaparral, cismontane woodland. Rocky areas in volcanic and serpentine soils with mixed chaparral and black oak woodland communities. Elevations: 295-3380ft. (90-1030m.) Blooms Mar-Jun.
Lupinus sericatus
Cobb Mountain lupine
None/None
G2?/S2?
1B.2
Perennial herb. Broadleafed upland forest, chaparral, cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest. In stands of knobcone pine-oak woodland, on open wooded slopes in gravelly soils; sometimes on serpentine.
Elevations: 900-5005ft. (275-1525m.) Blooms Mar-Jun.
Navarretia leucocephala ssp. bakeri
Baker's navarretia
None/None
G4T2/S2
1B.1
Annual herb. Cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest, meadows and seeps, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Vernal pools and swales; adobe or alkaline soils. Elevations: 15-5710ft. (5-1740m.) Blooms Apr-Jul.
Puccinellia simplex
California alkali grass
None/None
G3/S2
1B.2
Annual herb. Chenopod scrub, meadows and seeps, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Alkaline, vernally mesic. Sinks, flats, and lake margins. Elevations: 5-3050ft. (2-930m.) Blooms Mar-May.
Rhynchospora californica
California beaked-rush
None/None
G1/S1
1B.1
Perennial rhizomatous herb. Bogs and fens, lower montane coniferous forest, marshes and swamps, meadows and seeps. Freshwater seeps and open marshy areas. Elevations: 150-3315ft. (45-1010m.) Blooms May-Jul. 746
Special Status Species
Final Environmental Impact Report B-5
Scientific Name
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Senecio aphanactis
chaparral ragwort
None/None
G3/S2
2B.2
Annual herb. Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub. Drying alkaline flats. Elevations: 50-2625ft. (15- 800m.) Blooms Jan-Apr(May).
Sidalcea hickmanii ssp. napensis
Napa checkerbloom
None/None
G3T1/S1
1B.1
Perennial herb. Chaparral. Rhyolitic substrates. Elevations: 1360-2000ft. (415-610m.) Blooms Apr-Jun.
Spergularia macrotheca var.
longistyla
long-styled sand-spurrey
None/None
G5T2/S2
1B.2
Perennial herb. Marshes and swamps, meadows and seeps. Alkaline. Elevations: 0-835ft. (0-255m.) Blooms FebMay.
Stuckenia filiformis ssp. alpina
northern slender pondweed
None/None
G5T5/S2S3
2B.2
Perennial rhizomatous herb (aquatic). Marshes and swamps. Shallow, clear water of lakes and drainage channels.
Elevations: 985-7055ft. (300-2150m.) Blooms May-Jul.
Symphyotrichum lentum
Suisun Marsh aster
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Perennial rhizomatous herb. Marshes and swamps. Most often seen along sloughs with Phragmites, Scirpus, blackberry, Typha, etc. Elevations: 0-10ft. (0-3m.) Blooms (Apr)May-Nov.
Trichostema ruygtii
Napa bluecurls
None/None
G1G2/S1S2
1B.2
Annual herb. Chaparral, cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Often in open, sunny areas. Also has been found in vernal pools. Elevations: 100-2230ft. (30-680m.) Blooms Jun-Oct.
Trifolium amoenum
two-fork clover
FE/None
G1/S1
1B.1
Annual herb. Coastal bluff scrub, valley and foothill grassland. Sometimes on serpentine soil, open sunny sites, swales. Most recently cited on roadside and eroding cliff face. Elevations: 15-1360ft. (5-415m.) Blooms Apr-Jun.
Trifolium hydrophilum
saline clover
None/None
G2/S2
1B.2
Annual herb. Marshes and swamps, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Mesic, alkaline sites. Elevations: 0- 985ft. (0-300m.) Blooms Apr-Jun.
Viburnum ellipticum
oval-leaved viburnum
None/None
G4G5/S3?
2B.3
Perennial deciduous shrub. Chaparral, cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest. Elevations: 705- 4595ft. (215-1400m.) Blooms May-Jun.
Invertebrates
Bombus crotchii
Crotch bumble bee
None/NoneSCE
G2/S1S2
Coastal California east to the Sierra-Cascade crest and south into Mexico. Food plant genera include Antirrhinum, Phacelia, Clarkia, Dendromecon, Eschscholzia, and Eriogonum.
Bombus occidentalis
western bumble bee
None/NoneSCE
G2G3/S1
Once common and widespread, species has declined precipitously from central CA to southern B.C., perhaps from disease. .
747
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
B-6
Scientific Name
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Branchinecta lynchi
vernal pool fairy shrimp
FT/None
G3/S3
Endemic to the grasslands of the Central Valley, Central Coast mountains, and South Coast mountains, in astatic rain-filled pools. Inhabit small, clear-water sandstone-depression pools and grassed swale, earth slump, or basaltflow depression pools.
Desmocerus californicus dimorphus
valley elderberry longhorn beetle
FT/None
G3T2T3/S3
Occurs only in the Central Valley of California, in association with blue elderberry (Sambucus mexicana). Prefers to lay eggs in elderberries 2-8 inches in diameter; some preference shown for "stressed" elderberries.
Speyeria callippe callippe
callippe silverspot butterfly
FE/None
G5T1/S1
Restricted to the northern coastal scrub of the San Francisco peninsula. Hostplant is Viola pedunculata. Most adults found on E-facing slopes; males congregate on hilltops in search of females.
Syncaris pacifica
California freshwater shrimp
FE/SE
G2/S2
Endemic to Marin, Napa, and Sonoma counties. Found in low elevation, low gradient streams where riparian cover is moderate to heavy. Shallow pools away from main streamflow. Winter: undercut banks with exposed roots.
Summer: leafy branches touching water.
Fish
Acipenser medirostris pop. 1
green sturgeon - southern DPS
FT/None
G3T1/S1
Spawning site fidelity. Spawns in the Sacramento, Feather and Yuba Rivers. Presence in upper Stanislaus and San Joaquin Rivers may indicate spawning. Non-spawning adults occupy marine/estuarine waters. Delta Estuary is important for rearing juveniles. Spawning occurs primarily in cool (11-15 C) sections of mainstem rivers in deep pools (8-9 meters) with substrate containing small to medium sized sand, gravel, cobble, or boulder.
Acipenser transmontanus
white sturgeon
None/SCT
G3/S2
SSC
Live in estuaries of large rivers, moving into freshwater to spawn. Most abundant in brackish portions of estuaries.
In estuaries adults concentrate in deep areas with soft bottoms.
Hypomesus transpacificus
Delta smelt
FT/SE
G1/S1
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Seasonally in Suisun Bay, Carquinez Strait and San Pablo Bay. Seldom found at salinities > 10 ppt. Most often at salinities < 2ppt.
Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus pop. 8
steelhead - central California coast
DPS
FT/None
G5T2T3Q/S2S3
DPS includes all naturally spawned populations of steelhead (and their progeny) in streams from the Russian River to Aptos Creek, Santa Cruz County, California (inclusive). Also includes the drainages of San Francisco and San Pablo Bays. .
Pogonichthys macrolepidotus
Sacramento splittail
None/None
GNR/S3
SSC
Endemic to the lakes and rivers of the Central Valley, but now confined to the Delta, Suisun Bay and associated marshes. Slow moving river sections, dead end sloughs. Requires flooded vegetation for spawning and foraging for young.
Spirinchus thaleichthys
longfin smelt
FC/ST
G5/S1
Euryhaline, nektonic and anadromous. Found in open waters of estuaries, mostly in middle or bottom of water column. Prefer salinities of 15-30 ppt, but can be found in completely freshwater to almost pure seawater.
Amphibians
Dicamptodon ensatus
California giant salamander
None/None
G3/S2S3
SSC
Known from wet coastal forests near streams and seeps from Mendocino County south to Monterey County, and east to Napa County. Aquatic larvae found in cold, clear streams, occasionally in lakes and ponds. Adults known from wet forests under rocks and logs near streams and lakes. 748
Special Status Species
Final Environmental Impact Report B-7
Scientific Name
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Rana boylii pop. 1
foothill yellow-legged frog - north
coast DPS
None/NoneSE
G3TNRQ/S3
SSC
Northern Coast Ranges north of San Francisco Bay Estuary, Klamath Mountains, and Cascade Range including watershed subbasins (HU 8) Lower Pit, Battle Creek, Thomes Creek, and Big Chico Creek in Lassen, Shasta, Tehama, and Butte Counties. Partly shaded shallow streams and riffles with a rocky substrate in a variety of habitats. Needs at least some cobble-sized substrate for egg-laying and at least 15 weeks to attain metamorphosis.
Rana draytonii
California red-legged frog
FT/None
G2G3/S2S3
SSC
Lowlands and foothills in or near permanent sources of deep water with dense, shrubby or emergent riparian vegetation. Requires 11-20 weeks of permanent water for larval development. Must have access to estivation habitat.
Taricha rivularis
red-bellied newt
None/None
G2/S2
SSC
Coastal drainages from Humboldt County south to Sonoma County, inland to Lake County. Isolated population of uncertain origin in Santa Clara County. Lives in terrestrial habitats, juveniles generally underground, adults active at surface in moist environments. Will migrate over 1 km to breed, typically in streams with moderate flow and clean, rocky substrate.
Reptiles
Emys marmorata
western pond turtle
None/NoneFPT
G3G4/S3
SSC
A thoroughly aquatic turtle of ponds, marshes, rivers, streams and irrigation ditches, usually with aquatic vegetation, below 6000 ft elevation. Needs basking sites and suitable (sandy banks or grassy open fields) upland habitat up to 0.5 km from water for egg-laying.
Masticophis lateralis euryxanthus
Alameda whipsnake
FT/ST
G4T2/S2
Typically found in chaparral and scrub habitats but will also use adjacent grassland, oak savanna and woodland habitats. Mostly south-facing slopes and ravines, with rock outcrops, deep crevices or abundant rodent burrows, where shrubs form a vegetative mosaic with oak trees and grasses.
Birds
Accipiter cooperii
Cooper's hawk
None/None
G5/S4
WL
Woodland, chiefly of open, interrupted or marginal type. Nest sites mainly in riparian growths of deciduous trees, as in canyon bottoms on river flood-plains; also, live oaks.
Agelaius tricolor
tricolored blackbird
None/ST
G1G2/S1S2
SSC
Highly colonial species, most numerous in Central Valley and vicinity. Largely endemic to California. Requires open water, protected nesting substrate, and foraging area with insect prey within a few km of the colony.
Aquila chrysaetos
golden eagle
None/None
G5/S3
FP
WL
Rolling foothills, mountain areas, sage-juniper flats, and desert. Cliff-walled canyons provide nesting habitat in most parts of range; also, large trees in open areas.
Asio flammeus
short-eared owl
None/None
G5/S3
SSC
Found in swamp lands, both fresh and salt; lowland meadows; irrigated alfalfa fields. Tule patches/tall grass needed for nesting/daytime seclusion. Nests on dry ground in depression concealed in vegetation. 749
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
B-8
Scientific Name
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Athene cunicularia
burrowing owl
None/None SCE
G4/S3
SSC
Open, dry annual or perennial grasslands, deserts, and scrublands characterized by low-growing vegetation.
Subterranean nester, dependent upon burrowing mammals, most notably, the California ground squirrel.
Buteo regalis
ferruginous hawk
None/None
G4/S3S4
WL
Open grasslands, sagebrush flats, desert scrub, low foothills and fringes of pinyon and juniper habitats. Eats mostly lagomorphs, ground squirrels, and mice. Population trends may follow lagomorph population cycles.
Buteo swainsoni
Swainson's hawk
None/ST
G5/S3
Breeds in grasslands with scattered trees, juniper-sage flats, riparian areas, savannahs, and agricultural or ranch lands with groves or lines of trees. Requires adjacent suitable foraging areas such as grasslands, or alfalfa or grain fields supporting rodent populations.
Charadrius nivosus nivosus
western snowy plover
FT/None
G3T3/S2
SSC
Sandy beaches, salt pond levees and shores of large alkali lakes. Needs sandy, gravelly or friable soils for nesting.
Circus hudsonius
northern harrier
None/None
G5/S3
SSC
Coastal salt and freshwater marsh. Nest and forage in grasslands, from salt grass in desert sink to mountain cienagas. Nests on ground in shrubby vegetation, usually at marsh edge; nest built of a large mound of sticks in wet areas.
Coturnicops noveboracensis
yellow rail
None/None
G4/S1S2
SSC
Summer resident in eastern Sierra Nevada in Mono County. Freshwater marshlands.
Cypseloides niger
black swift
None/None
G4/S2
SSC
Coastal belt of Santa Cruz and Monterey counties; central and southern Sierra Nevada; San Bernardino and San Jacinto mountains. Breeds in small colonies on cliffs behind or adjacent to waterfalls in deep canyons and seabluffs above the surf; forages widely.
Elanus leucurus
white-tailed kite
None/None
G5/S3S4
FP
Rolling foothills and valley margins with scattered oaks and river bottomlands or marshes next to deciduous woodland. Open grasslands, meadows, or marshes for foraging close to isolated, dense-topped trees for nesting and perching.
Falco peregrinus anatum
American peregrine falcon
FD/SD
G4T4/S3S4
FP
Near wetlands, lakes, rivers, or other water; on cliffs, banks, dunes, mounds; also, human-made structures. Nest consists of a scrape or a depression or ledge in an open site.
Geothlypis trichas sinuosa
saltmarsh common yellowthroat
None/None
G5T3/S3
SSC
Resident of the San Francisco Bay region, in fresh and salt water marshes. Requires thick, continuous cover down to water surface for foraging; tall grasses, tule patches, willows for nesting.
Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus
California black rail
None/ST
G3T1/S1
FP
Inhabits freshwater marshes, wet meadows and shallow margins of saltwater marshes bordering larger bays.
Needs water depths of about 1 inch that do not fluctuate during the year and dense vegetation for nesting habitat. 750
Special Status Species
Final Environmental Impact Report B-9
Scientific Name
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Melospiza melodia maxillaris
Suisun song sparrow
None/None
G5T3/S3
SSC
Resident of brackish-water marshes surrounding Suisun Bay. Inhabits cattails, tules and other sedges, and Salicornia; also known to frequent tangles bordering sloughs.
Melospiza melodia samuelis
San Pablo song sparrow
None/None
G5T2/S2
SSC
Resident of salt marshes along the north side of San Francisco and San Pablo bays. Inhabits tidal sloughs in the Salicornia marshes; nests in Grindelia bordering slough channels.
Pandion haliaetus
osprey
None/None
G5/S4
WL
Ocean shore, bays, freshwater lakes, and larger streams. Large nests built in tree-tops within 15 miles of a good fish-producing body of water.
Rallus obsoletus obsoletus
California Ridgway's rail
FE/SE
G3T1/S1
FP
Salt water and brackish marshes traversed by tidal sloughs in the vicinity of San Francisco Bay. Associated with abundant growths of pickleweed, but feeds away from cover on invertebrates from mud-bottomed sloughs.
Riparia riparia
bank swallow
None/ST
G5/S2
Colonial nester; nests primarily in riparian and other lowland habitats west of the desert. Requires vertical banks/cliffs with fine-textured/sandy soils near streams, rivers, lakes, ocean to dig nesting hole.
Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus
yellow-headed blackbird
None/None
G5/S3
SSC
Nests in freshwater emergent wetlands with dense vegetation and deep water. Often along borders of lakes or ponds. Nests only where large insects such as Odonata are abundant, nesting timed with maximum emergence of aquatic insects.
Mammals
Antrozous pallidus
pallid bat
None/None
G4/S3
SSC
Found in a variety of habitats including deserts, grasslands, shrublands, woodlands, and forests. Most common in open, dry habitats with rocky areas for roosting. Roosts in crevices of rock outcrops, caves, mine tunnels, buildings, bridges, and hollows of live and dead trees which must protect bats from high temperatures. Very sensitive to disturbance of roosting sites.
Corynorhinus townsendii
Townsend's big-eared bat
None/None
G4/S2
SSC
Occurs throughout California in a wide variety of habitats. Most common in mesic sites, typically coniferous or deciduous forests. Roosts in the open, hanging from walls & ceilings in caves, lava tubes, bridges, and buildings. This species is extremely sensitive to human disturbance.
Nyctinomops macrotis
big free-tailed bat
None/None
G5/S3
SSC
Low-lying arid areas in Southern California. Need high cliffs or rocky outcrops for roosting sites. Feeds principally on large moths.
Reithrodontomys raviventris
salt-marsh harvest mouse
FE/SE
G1G2/S1S2
FP
Only in the saline emergent wetlands of San Francisco Bay and its tributaries. Pickleweed is primary habitat, but may occur in other marsh vegetation types and in adjacent upland areas. Does not burrow; builds loosely organized nests. Requires higher areas for flood escape. 751
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
B-10
Scientific Name
Common Name Status Habitat Requirements
Sorex ornatus sinuosus
Suisun shrew
None/None
G5T1T2Q/S1S2
SSC
Tidal marshes of the northern shores of San Pablo and Suisun bays. Require dense low-lying cover and driftweed and other litter above the mean hightide line for nesting and foraging.
Taxidea taxus
American badger
None/None
G5/S3
SSC
Most abundant in drier open stages of most shrub, forest, and herbaceous habitats, with friable soils. Needs sufficient food, friable soils and open, uncultivated ground. Preys on burrowing rodents. Digs burrows.
Regional Vicinity refers to within a 9-quad search radius of site.
Status (Federal/State)
FE = Federal Endangered
FT = Federal Threatened
FPE = Federal Proposed Endangered
FPT = Federal Proposed Threatened
FD = Federal Delisted
FC = Federal Candidate
SE = State Endangered
ST = State Threatened
SCE = State Candidate Endangered
SCT = State Candidate Threatened
SR = State Rare
SD = State Delisted
SSC = CDFW Species of Special Concern
FP = CDFW Fully Protected
WL = CDFW Watch List
CRPR (CNPS California Rare Plant Rank)
1A = Presumed extirpated in California, and rare or extinct elsewhere 1B = Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California and elsewhere 2A = Presumed extirpated in California, but common elsewhere 2B= Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California, but more common elsewhere 3 = Need more information (Review List)
4 = Limited Distribution (Watch List)
CRPR Threat Code Extension
.1 = Seriously endangered in California (>80% of occurrences threatened/high degree and immediacy of threat) .2 = Moderately threatened in California (20-80% of occurrences threatened/moderate degree and immediacy of threat) .3 = Not very endangered in California (<20% of occurrences threatened/low degree and immediacy of threat) Other Statuses
G1 or S1 Critically Imperiled Globally or Subnationally (state) G2 or S2 Imperiled Globally or Subnationally (state)
G3 or S3 Vulnerable to extirpation or extinction Globally or Subnationally (state) G4/5 or S4/5 Apparently secure, common and abundant
GH or SH Possibly Extirpated – missing; known from only historical occurrences but still some hope of rediscovery Additional notations may be provided as follows
T – Intraspecific Taxon (subspecies, varieties, and other designations below the level of species) Q – Questionable taxonomy that may reduce conservation priority ? – Inexact numeric rank
752
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Environmental Impact Report 1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that a reporting or monitoring program be adopted for the conditions of project approval that are necessary to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment (Public Resources Code 21081.6). This mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) is intended to track and ensure compliance with adopted mitigation measures during the project implementation phase. For each mitigation measure recommended in the Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR), specifications are made herein that identify the action required, the monitoring that must occur, and the agency or department responsible for oversight.
ATTACHMENT 1, EXHIBIT D
753
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
2 Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
Aesthetics
AES-1: Construction Lighting Plan
Prior to nighttime construction, if needed for a particular project, project applicants shall submit a construction lighting plan to the City for review and approval. The
construction lighting plan shall ensure that the minimum amount of lighting is used to meet safety requirements and ensure no spillover occurs to nearby sensitive uses. All lighting shall be directed downward and away from
surrounding land uses.
The City shall review and approve the
construction lighting plan submitted
by the project applicant.
Prior to construction Once during
plan review
and then
periodically
during
construction
to ensure
lighting is
properly
operated
City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
AES-2: Operational Lighting Plan
Prior to discretionary project approval, the project applicant shall prepare and submit a photometric plan to the City for review and approval which demonstrates that all exterior light fixtures will be directed downward or employ full cutoff fixtures to prevent light spillage. The approved plan shall be incorporated into the project design plans.
The City shall review and approve the
photometric plan submitted by the
project applicant before issuance of
an occupancy permit.
Prior to construction Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
Air Quality
AQ-1: Conduct Construction Health Risk Assessment
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit to the City a
construction health risk assessment (HRA) in accordance with BAAQMD recommendations for any development
project (including the proposed Newell Drive extension) that has at least one the following characteristics:
The project is located within 1,000 feet of sensitive
receptors.
Project construction would last longer than two
months.
Project construction would not utilize equipment rated
USEPA Tier 4 (for equipment of 50 horsepower or
more); construction equipment fitted with Level 3
Diesel Particulate Filters (for all equipment of 50
horsepower or more); or alternative fuel construction
equipment.
If the HRA determines that construction will exceed
BAAQMD significance thresholds, the HRA shall provide
mitigation measures to reduce the impact to less than
significant, including but not limited to requiring the The City shall review the construction
health risk assessment submitted by
the project applicant for any project
that includes one of the listed
characteristics. The City shall verify
that mitigation measures described in
the project HRA are implemented at
the project site.
Prior to issuance of a
grading or building
permit, whichever
occurs first; then
periodically
throughout
construction.
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
and Public
Works
Department
754
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Environmental Impact Report 3
Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
use of Tier 4 engines, Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters, and/or alternative fuel construction equipment.
AQ-2: Reduce Operational Toxic Air Contaminants Near Sensitive Receptors For new sensitive receptors proposed within 500 feet of major sources of TAC (high volume roadways with 10,000
vehicles or more per day), the project applicant shall prepare an operational health risk assessment for the City’s review and approval. If TAC exposure at new sensitive receptor sites would exceed BAAQMD health risk thresholds, the project applicant would be required to include mechanical air
filtration or other measures to reduce health risk exposure to acceptable levels.
The City shall review the operational
health risk assessment submitted by
the project applicant for any project
proposed within 500 feet of major
sources of TAC. If TAC exposure at
new sensitive receptor sites exceed
BAAQMD health risks thresholds, the
project applicant shall include
mechanical air filtration to reduce
health risk exposure.
Prior to issuance of a
grading or building
permit, whichever
occurs first; then
periodically
throughout
construction.
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
AQ-3: Conduct Operational Health Risk Assessment
Prior to submittal of a subsequent discretionary
development permit application for industrial, warehousing, or commercial land uses that would generate at least 100 diesel trucks per day or 40 or more trucks with dieselpowered transport refrigeration units per day, the applicant shall submit an operational health risk assessment (HRA) or submit proof that an HRA is not required in accordance with BAAQMD thresholds. If required, the operational HRA shall be prepared in accordance with the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and BAAQMD requirements, and
mitigated to an acceptable level. Typical measures to reduce risk impacts may include, but are not limited to:
▪ Restricting idling on-site beyond Air Toxic Control
Measures idling restrictions, as feasible.
▪ Electrifying warehousing docks.
▪ Truck Electric Vehicle (EV) Capable trailer spaces.
▪ Requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles.
▪ Restricting off-site truck travel through the creation of truck routes.
▪ The operational HRA shall be provided to the City for review and concurrence prior to project approval.
The City shall review the operational
health risk assessment submitted by
the project applicant, when required,
or verify that that an HRA is not
required in accordance with
BAAQMD thresholds.
Prior to submittal of a
subsequent
discretionary
development permit
application; once
before issuance of an
occupancy permit
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
755
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
4 Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
AQ-4: Reduce Operational Odor Impacts
Prior to discretionary approval by the City, if it is determined that a development project has the potential to emit
nuisance odors beyond the property line, the project
applicant shall prepare an odor management plan and
submit it to the City for review and approval. Facilities that have the potential to generate nuisance odors include, but are not limited to:
▪ Wastewater treatment plants
▪ Composting, green waste, or recycling facilities
▪ Fiberglass manufacturing facilities
▪ Painting/coating operations
▪ Large-capacity coffee roasters
▪ Food-processing facilities
The City shall review the odor
management plan submitted by the
project applicant, when required, or
verify that the project does not have
the potential to emit nuisance odors
beyond the property line.
Prior to submittal of a
subsequent
discretionary
development permit
application; once
before issuance of an
occupancy permit
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
Biological Resources
BIO-1: Biological Resources Screening and Assessment
For projects proposed within undeveloped parcels, the City shall require project applicants to engage a qualified
biologist (having the appropriate education and experience level) to perform a baseline Biological Resources Screening and Assessment to determine whether projects proposed
within undeveloped parcels have any potential to impact special-status biological resources, inclusive of special-status plants and animals, sensitive vegetation communities
(including vernal pools and other wetlands), and critical habitat. If it is determined that the project has no potential to impact biological resources, no further action is required.
If the project would have the potential to impact biological resources, prior to construction, a qualified biologist shall conduct a project-specific biological analysis to document the existing biological resources within a project footprint plus a minimum buffer of 500 feet around the project
footprint, as is feasible, and to determine the potential impacts to those resources. The project-specific biological analysis shall evaluate the potential for impacts to all biological resources including, but not limited to specialstatus species, nesting birds, wildlife movement, sensitive plant communities, critical habitats, and other resources judged to be sensitive by local, state, and/or federal
agencies. If the project would have the potential to impact these resources, the following mitigation measures
(mitigation measures BIO-2 through BIO-8) shall be
The City shall verify that a baseline
Biological Resources Screening and
Assessment was conducted by a
qualified biologist. If it is determined
that the project has no potential to
impact biological resources, no
further action is required. If the
project has the potential to impact
biological resources, the City shall
verify that Mitigation Measures BIO-2
through BIO-8 are implemented to
reduce impacts to a less than
significant level. The City shall review
and approve the biological resources
screening and assessment.
Prior to project
approval
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
756
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Environmental Impact Report 5
Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
incorporated, as applicable, to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Pending the results of the project-specific biological analysis, design alterations, further technical studies (e.g., protocol surveys) and consultations with the USFWS, CDFW, and/or other local, state, and federal
agencies may be required. Note that specific surveys
described in the mitigation measures below may be
completed as part of the project-specific biological analysis where suitable habitat is present.
BIO-2: Special-Status Plant Species Surveys
If the project-specific Biological Resources Screening and Assessment (Mitigation Measure BIO-1) determines that
there is potential for significant impacts to federally or statelisted plants or regional population level impacts to species with a CRPR of 1B or 2B from project development, a
qualified biologist shall complete surveys for special-status plants prior to any vegetation removal, grubbing, or other construction activity (including staging and mobilization). The surveys shall be floristic in nature and shall be seasonally timed to coincide with the target species. All plant surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist during the
blooming season prior to development permit approval. All special-status plant species identified on site shall be mapped onto a site-specific aerial photograph or topographic map with the use of Global Positioning System unit. Surveys shall be conducted in accordance with the most current
protocols established by the CDFW, USFWS, and the local jurisdictions if said protocols exist. A report of the survey results shall be submitted to the City, and the CDFW and/or USFWS, as appropriate, for review and/or approval.
The City shall verify that a qualified
biologist has conducted
preconstructions surveys for specialstatus species plants prior to any vegetation removal, grubbing, or
other construction activity (including
staging and mobilization). All plant
special-status plant species identified
on site shall be mapped onto a sitespecific aerial photograph or topographic map with the use of
Global Positioning System unit. A
report of the survey result shall be
submitted to the City, and the CDFW
and/or USFWS as appropriate, for
review and/or approval.
Prior to construction
activities
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
California
Department
of Fish and
Wildlife
United States
Fish and
Wildlife
BIO-3: Special-Status Plant Species Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation If federally and/or state-listed or CRPR 1B or 2 species are found during special-status plant surveys (pursuant to
Mitigation Measure BIO-2), and would be directly impacted, or there would be a population-level impact to non-listed sensitive species, then the project shall be re-designed to avoid impacting those plant species, where feasible. Rare and listed plant occurrences that are not within the
immediate disturbance footprint but are located within 50 feet of disturbance limits shall have bright orange protective fencing installed at least 30 feet beyond their extent, or The project shall be re-designed to
avoid impacting federally and/or
state listed or CRPR 1B or 2 Species.
Rare and listed plant occurrences
that are not in the immediate
disturbance footprint but are located
within 50 feet of disturbance limits
shall have bright orange protective
fencing installed at least 30 feet
beyond their extent.
Prior to ground
disturbance activities
and then as needed
during construction to
verify avoidance
buffers are
maintained.
Periodically
during
construction
City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
757
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
6 Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
other distance as approved by a qualified biologist, to protect them from harm.
BIO-4: Habitat Restoration Program
If federally or state-listed plants or non-listed special-status CRPR 1B and 2 plant populations identified during special status plant surveys (pursuant to Mitigation Measure BIO-2), cannot be avoided, and will be impacted by development, all impacts shall be mitigated by the applicant at a ratio not lower than 1:1 per acre of impact (and 1:1 per tree), and to be determined by the City (in coordination with CDFW and USFWS as and if applicable) for each species as a component of habitat restoration. A qualified biologist shall prepare and submit a restoration plan to the City for review and approval prior to City approval of project plans. (Note: if a federally and/or state-listed plant species will be impacted, the restoration plan shall be submitted to the USFWS and/or CDFW for review, and federal and/or state take authorization may be required by these agencies.) The restoration plan shall include, at a minimum, the following components:
1. Description of the project/impact site (i.e., location, responsible parties, areas to be impacted by habitat
type).
2. Goal(s) of the compensatory mitigation project (type[s] and area[s]) of habitat to be established, restored,
enhanced, and/or preserved; specific functions and
values of habitat type[s] to be established, restored,
enhanced, and/or preserved).
3. Description of the proposed compensatory mitigation
site (location and size, ownership status, existing
functions, and values).
4. Implementation plan for the compensatory mitigation
site (rationale for expecting implementation success,
responsible parties, schedule, site preparation,
planting plan).
5. Maintenance activities during the monitoring period, including weed removal as appropriate (activities,
responsible parties, schedule).
6. Monitoring plan for the compensatory mitigation site, including no less than quarterly monitoring for the first year (performance standards, target functions and
values, target acreages to be established, restored,
All impacts shall be mitigated by the
applicant at a ratio not lower than 1:1
per acre of impact (and 1:1) per tree,
and to be determined by the City (in
coordination with CDFW and USFWS
as applicable) for each species as a
component of habitat restoration.
Prior to ground
disturbance activities
and then as needed
during construction to
avoid additional
impacts to specialstatus plants.
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
California
Department
of Fish and
Wildlife
United States
Fish and
Wildlife
758
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Environmental Impact Report 7
Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
enhanced, and/or preserved, annual monitoring
reports).
7. Success criteria based on the goals and measurable
objectives; said criteria to be, at a minimum, at least 80 percent survival of container plants and 30 percent
relative cover by vegetation type or other industry
standards as determined by a qualified restoration
specialist.
8. An adaptive management program and remedial
measures to address any shortcomings in meeting
success criteria.
9. Notification of completion of compensatory mitigation and agency confirmation.
10. Contingency measures (initiating procedures,
alternative locations for contingency compensatory
mitigation, funding mechanism).
11. All nursery plants used in restoration shall be inspected for sudden oak death.
BIO-5: Endangered/Threatened Special-Status Species Habitat Assessments and Protocol Surveys If the results of the project-specific biological analysis (Mitigation Measure BIO-1) determine that suitable habitat may be present for federal or state listed, candidate, or proposed species, protocol habitat assessments/surveys shall be completed in accordance with current CDFW and/or
USFWS protocols prior to issuance of any construction
permits. If, through consultation with the CDFW and/or
USFWS, it is determined that protocol habitat
assessments/surveys are not required, the applicant shall complete and document this consultation and submit it to the City prior to issuance of any construction permits. Each protocol has different survey and timing requirements. The applicant shall be responsible for ensuring they understand the protocol requirements and shall hire a qualified biologist to conduct protocol surveys. (Note: if a federally and/or state-listed wildlife species will be impacted, federal and/or state take authorization may be required by USFWS and
CDFW.)
The City shall review and approve the
application consultation with the
CDFW and/or USFWS, if it the results
of the project-specific biological
analysis determines that suitable
habitats may be present for federal
or state listed species. The applicant
shall be responsible for ensuring they
understand the protocol
requirements and shall hire a
qualified biologist to conduct
protocol surveys.
Prior to issuance of
any construction
permits.
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
BIO-6: Endangered/threatened Animal Species Avoidance and Minimization The following measures shall be applied to impacted aquatic and/or terrestrial animal species identified by the projectspecific Biological Resources Screening and Assessment required under Mitigation Measure BIO-1.
The City shall review documentation
detailing how all identified aquatic
features will be avoided.
Prior to project
approval
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
759
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
8 Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
1. Ground disturbance shall be limited to the minimum
necessary to complete the project. A qualified biologist shall flag the project limits of disturbance. Areas of
special biological concern within or adjacent to the
limits of disturbance shall have highly visible orange
construction fencing installed between said area and
the limits of disturbance.
2. All projects occurring within/adjacent to aquatic
habitats (including riparian habitats and wetlands) shall be completed between April 1 and October 31, if
feasible, to avoid impacts to sensitive aquatic species.
Any work outside these dates would require projectspecific approval from the City and may be subject to regulatory agency approval.
3. All projects occurring within or adjacent to sensitive habitats that may support federally and/or state-listed endangered/threatened species shall have a CDFWand/or USFWS-approved biologist present during all initial ground disturbing/vegetation clearing activities.
Once initial ground disturbing/vegetation clearing
activities have been completed, said biologist shall
conduct daily pre-activity clearance surveys for
endangered/threatened species. Alternatively, and
upon approval of the CDFW and/or USFWS, said
biologist may conduct site inspections at a minimum of
once per week to ensure all prescribed avoidance and
minimization measures are fully implemented.
4. No endangered/threatened species shall be captured
and relocated without express permission from the
CDFW and/or USFWS.
5. If at any time during project construction an
endangered/threatened species enters the
construction site or otherwise may be impacted by the
project, all project activities shall cease. A
CDFW/USFWS-approved biologist shall document the
occurrence and consult with the CDFW and USFWS, as
appropriate, to determine whether it was safe for
project activities to resume.
6. For all work occurring in areas where
endangered/threatened species may be present and
are at risk of entering the project site during
construction, the applicant shall install exclusion
fencing along the project boundaries prior to start of
construction (including staging and mobilization). The
Development
Department
760
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Environmental Impact Report 9
Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
placement of the fence shall be at the discretion of the CDFW/USFWS-approved biologist. This fence shall
consist of solid silt fencing placed at a minimum of
three feet above grade and two feet below grade and
shall be attached to wooden stakes placed at intervals
of not more than five feet. The applicant shall inspect the fence weekly and following rain events and high
wind events and shall be maintained in good working
condition until all construction activities are complete.
7. All vehicle maintenance/fueling/staging shall occur not less than 100 feet from any riparian habitat or water
body, including seasonal wetland features. Suitable
containment procedures shall be implemented to
prevent spills. A minimum of one spill kit shall be
available at each work location near riparian habitat or water bodies.
8. No equipment shall be permitted to enter wetted
portions of any affected drainage channel or wetland.
9. At the end of each workday, excavations shall be
secured with a cover or a ramp provided to prevent
wildlife entrapment.
10. All trenches, pipes, culverts, or similar structures shall be inspected for animals prior to burying, capping,
moving, or filling.
11. Considering the potential for the project to impact federally and state-listed species and their habitat, the City shall contact CDFW and USFWS to identify
mitigation banks within Napa County during project
development. If the results of the project-specific
biological analysis (Mitigation Measure BIO-1)
determine that impacts to federally and state
threatened or endangered species habitat are
expected, City and/or applicant shall explore speciesappropriate mitigation bank(s) servicing the region for purchase of mitigation credits.
12. Prior to grading and construction in natural areas of containing suitable upland habitat, a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey as determined
necessary during the biological analysis (Mitigation
Measure BIO-1) . The survey should include a transect
survey over the entire project disturbance footprint
(including access and staging areas), and mapping of
suitable habitat features, such as burrows, that are
potentially suitable for listed species. If any listed
761
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
10 Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
species are detected, no work shall be conducted until
the individual(s) leaves the site of their own accord,
unless federal and/or state “take” authorization has
been issued for relocation. Typical preconstruction
survey procedures, such as burrow scoping and burrow
collapse, cannot be conducted without federal and
state permits. If any life stage of listed species are
found within the survey area, the City and/or applicant shall consult with the USFWS and CDFW to determine
the appropriate course of action to comply with the
FESA and CESA, if permits are not already in place at
the time of construction.
BIO-7: Pre-Construction Bird Surveys, Avoidance, and Notification For all future development under the 2040 General Plan, construction activities initiated during the bird nesting season (February 1 – September 15), involving removal of vegetation (e.g. trees and shrubs), abandoned structures, or other nesting bird habitat, a pre-construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted no more than 5 days prior to
initiation of ground disturbance and vegetation removal. The nesting bird pre-construction survey shall be conducted on foot and shall include a buffer around the construction site at a distance determined by a qualified biologist, including staging and storage areas. The minimum survey radii
surrounding the work area shall be the following: 250 feet for non-raptors and 1,000 feet for raptors. The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist familiar with the identification of avian species known to occur in the
American Canyon region. If construction lapses for seven days or longer, the qualified biologist shall conduct another focused survey before project activities are reinitiated. If nests are found, an avoidance buffer shall be determined by the biologist dependent upon the species, the proposed
work activity, and existing disturbances associated with land uses outside of the site. The qualified biologist shall observe the active nest to establish a behavioral baseline of the adults and nestlings, if present. The qualified biologist shall continuously monitor the active nests to detect signs of disturbance and behavioral change as a result of
construction impacts, such as noise, vibration, odors, or worker/equipment motion. If signs of disturbance and
behavioral changes are observed, the qualified biologist shall cease work causing those changes and may contact CDFW or USFWS for guidance. The buffer shall be demarcated by the The project applicant shall retain a
qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction nesting bird survey no more than 5 days prior to the
initiation of ground disturbance and
vegetation removal. The nesting bird
pre-construction survey shall be
conducted on foot and shall include a
buffer around the construction site at
a distance determined by a qualified
biologist, including staging and
storage areas. The minimum survey
radii surrounding the work area shall
be the following: 250 feet for nonraptors and 1,000 feet for raptors.
Prior to the start of
any construction
activities
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
762
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Environmental Impact Report 11
Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
biologist with bright orange construction fencing, flagging, construction lathe, or other means to demarcate the
boundary. All construction personnel shall be notified of the buffer zone as an “Ecologically Sensitive Area” and to avoid entering the buffer zone during the nesting season. No
ground disturbing activities shall occur within the buffer until the biologist has confirmed that breeding/nesting is
completed and the young have fledged the nest.
Encroachment into the buffer shall occur only at the
discretion of the qualified biologist on the basis that the encroachment will not be detrimental to an active nest. A report summarizing the pre-construction survey(s) shall be prepared by a qualified biologist and shall be submitted to the City prior to the commencement of construction
activities.
Project site plans shall include a statement acknowledging compliance with the federal MBTA and California Fish and Game Code that includes avoidance of active bird nests and identification of Best Management Practices to avoid impacts to active nests, including checking for nests prior to
construction activities during February 1 to September 15, and what to do if an active nest is found so that the nest is not inadvertently impacted during grading or construction activities.
BIO-8: Roasting Bat Surveys and Avoidance Prior to Removal For all future development under the 2040 General Plan that will require the removal of large trees (greater than 20 inches in diameter at five feet from the ground), abandoned buildings, bridges, or other suitable roosting structure identified during the Biological Resources Screening and Assessment (Mitigation Measure BIO-1), prior to tree and/or structure removal, a qualified biologist shall conduct a focused survey of all trees and structures to be removed or impacted by construction activities to determine whether active roosts of special-status bats are present on site. Tree or structure removal shall be planned for either the spring or the fall, and timed to ensure both suitable conditions for the detection of bats and adequate time for tree and/or
structure removal to occur during seasonal periods of bat activity exclusive of the breeding season, as described below.
Trees and/or structures containing suitable potential bat roost habitat features shall be clearly marked or identified. If no bat roosts are found, the results of the survey will be The project applicant shall retain a
qualified biologist to conduct a
focused survey of all trees and
structures to be removed or
impacted by construction activities to
determine whether active roosts or
special-status bats are present on
site. If no bat roosts are found, the
results of the survey will be
documented and submitted to the
City within 30 days for review and
approval of the survey.
Prior to the start of
any construction
activities
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
763
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
12 Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
documented and submitted to the City within 30 days of the survey, after which no further action will be required.
If roosts are present, the biologist shall prepare a sitespecific roosting bat protection plan to be implemented by the contractor following the City’s approval. Additionally, the qualified biologist shall determine compensatory mitigation for temporary or permanent habitat loss due to tree
removal, in conjunction with CDFW. The plan shall
incorporate the following guidance as appropriate:
• When possible, removal of trees/structures identified as suitable roosting habitat shall be conducted during
seasonal periods of bat activity, including the following:
o Between September 1 and about October
15, or before evening temperatures fall
below 45 degrees Fahrenheit and/or more
than 0.5 inch of rainfall within 24 hours
occurs.
o Between March 1 and April 15, or after
evening temperatures rise above 45
degrees Fahrenheit and/or no more than
0.5 inch of rainfall within 24 hours occurs.
• If a tree/structure must be removed during the
breeding season and is identified as potentially
containing a colonial maternity roost, then a qualified biologist shall conduct acoustic emergence surveys or
implement other appropriate methods to further
evaluate if the roost is an active maternity roost. Under the biologist’s guidance, the contractor shall
implement measures similar to or exceeding the
following:
o If it is determined that the roost is not an active
maternity roost, then the roost may be removed
in accordance with the other requirements of
this measure.
o If it is found that an active maternity roost of a
colonial roosting species is present, the roost
shall not be disturbed during the breeding
season (April 15 to August 31).
• Tree removal procedures shall be implemented using a
two-step tree removal process. This method is
conducted over two consecutive days and works by
creating noise and vibration by cutting non-habitat
branches and limbs from habitat trees using chainsaws
764
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Environmental Impact Report 13
Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
only (no excavators or other heavy machinery) on day
one. The noise and vibration disturbance, together with the visible alteration of the tree, is very effective in causing bats that emerge nightly to feed to not return
to the roost that night. The remainder of the tree is
removed on day two.
• Prior to the demolition of vacant structures within the project site, a qualified biologist shall conduct a
focused habitat assessment of all structures to be
demolished. The habitat assessment shall be conducted
enough in advance to ensure the commencement of
building demolition can be scheduled during seasonal
periods of bat activity (see above), if required. If no signs of day roosting activity are observed, no further actions will be required. If bats or signs of day roosting by bats are observed, a qualified biologist will prepare specific recommendations such as partial dismantling
to cause bats to abandon the roost, or humane
eviction, both to be conducted during seasonal periods
of bat activity, if required.
• If the qualified biologist determines a roost is used by a large number of bats (large hibernaculum), bat boxes
shall be installed near the project site. The number of bat boxes installed will depend on the size of the
hibernaculum and shall be determined through
consultation with CDFW. If a maternity colony has
become established, all construction activities shall be postponed within a 500-foot buffer around the
maternity colony until it is determined by a qualified
biologist that the young have dispersed. Once it has
been determined that the roost is clear of bats, the
roost shall be removed immediately.
BIO-9: Conduct Pre-Construction Crotch’s Bumblebee Surveys and Implement Avoidance Measures If the results of the project-specific biological analysis (Mitigation Measure BIO-1) determine that suitable habitat may be present for Crotch’s bumble bee, a habitat
assessment shall be performed by a qualified biologist
knowledgeable and experienced with Crotch’s bumblebee
and the habitat in which they occur. If the biologist
determines that suitable habitat for Crotch’s bumblebee is present, a focused survey shall be performed during the species’ active flight period for Crotch’s bumblebee and peak The project applicant shall retain a
qualified biologist to perform a
focused survey if the project specific
biological analysis determines that
suitable habitats may be present for
Crotch’s Bumble Bee. The Crotch’s
bumble bee survey shall be
conducted on foot and shall
encompass the entirety of a project
Prior to the start of
any construction
activities
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
765
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
14 Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
blooming period of nectar and pollen sources (May 1
through July 31). The Crotch’s bumblebee survey shall be conducted on foot and shall encompass the entirety of a project site and focus on areas that allow for the highest probability of detection, such as high abundance nectar or pollen sources and rodent burrows that may be used for
breeding and nesting. If Crotch’s bumblebee is determined to be present, the project proponent shall map the locations of the observed bumblebee, areas of abundant nectar or
pollen sources, and any active nesting sites. A report
summarizing the results of the habitat assessment and
focused survey (if required) shall be prepared by the
qualified biologist and shall be submitted to the City prior to the commencement of construction activities. Further,
consultation with the CDFW will be necessary in the event Crotch’s bumblebee was observed within a project site and an Incidental Take Permit, in accordance with the California Endangered Species Act, may be required prior to initiating any ground disturbance on the site. If Crotch’s bumble are not listed and no longer candidates for listing at the time of project implementation, this mitigation measure would not be required.
site and focus on areas that allow for
the highest probability of detection,
such as high abundance nectar or
pollens sources and rodent burrows
that may be used fort breeding and
nesting. If Crotch’s bumblebee is
determined to be present, the
project proponent shall map the
locations of the observed bumblebee,
areas of abundant nectar or pollen
sources, and any active nesting sites.
A report summarizing the results of
the habitat assessment and focused
survey (if required) shall be prepared
by the qualified biologist and shall be
submitted to the City prior to the
commencement of construction
activities.
766
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Environmental Impact Report 15
Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
Cultural Resources
CUL-1: Historical Built Environment
Prior to project approval, the applicant shall submit a report to the City that identifies any historic-age features (i.e., structures over 45 years of age) proposed to be altered or demolished. If historical-age features are present, the applicant shall submit a historical resources evaluation to the City prepared in areas that contains buildings, structures, objects, sites, landscape/site plans, or other features that are 45 years of age or older, by a qualified architectural historian or historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s
Professional Qualifications Standards (PQS) in architectural history or history (36 CFR Part 61). The evaluation shall include an intensive-level evaluation, in accordance with the guidelines and best practices meeting the State Office of Historic Preservation guidelines. All evaluated properties shall be documented on Department of Parks and Recreation Series 523 Forms. The report shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.
If historical resources are identified through the survey and evaluation, efforts shall be made by the applicant to ensure that the relocation, rehabilitation, or alteration of the resource is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatments of Historic Properties
(Standards). The applicant shall submit a report to the City that identifies and specifies the treatment of characterdefining features and construction activities, and demonstrates how the project complies with the Standards and avoids the substantial adverse change in the significance of the historical resource as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b). The report shall be prepared by an
architectural historian or historical architect meeting the PQS as defined by 36 CFR Part 61 and provided to the City for review and concurrence prior to project approval.
The City shall review a report
identifying historic age features
proposed to be altered or
demolished on a proposed project
site. The City shall review the
historical resources evaluation report
prepared by a qualified historian and
submitted by the project applicant,
when applicable.
If historical resources are identified,
the City shall ensure that the
applicant appropriately relocates,
rehabilitates, or alters the resources.
Prior to project
approval
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
767
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
16 Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
CUL-2: Archaeological Resources Assessment
Prior to submittal of any discretionary development
application that involves ground disturbance activities (that may include but are not limited to, pavement removal,
potholing, grubbing, tree removal, and grading), the
applicant shall submit an archaeological resources
assessment prepared by a qualified archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology.
Assessments shall include a CHRIS records search at the NWIC and a SLF Search from the NAHC. The records searches shall characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated in and around the development site. If the assessment begins on or before 2027, the results of the NWIC and SLF search for this EIR can be summarized as part of the assessment. A Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in future project areas that are undeveloped to locate any surface cultural materials. By performing a records search, a SLF search, and a Phase I survey, a qualified archaeologist shall be able to classify the future project area as having high, medium, or low sensitivity for archaeological resources.
If the Phase I archaeological survey identifies resources that may be affected by the future project, the archaeological resources assessment shall also include Phase II testing and evaluation. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site-specific mitigation measures shall be
identified in the Phase II evaluation. These measures may include, but would not be limited to, a Phase III data
recovery program, avoidance, or other appropriate actions to be determined by a qualified archaeologist. If significant archaeological resources cannot be avoided, impacts may be reduced to less than significant level by filling on top of the sites rather than cutting into the cultural deposits.
Alternatively, and/or in addition, a data collection program may be warranted, including mapping the location of
artifacts, surface collection of artifacts, or excavation of the cultural deposit, to characterize the nature of the buried portions of sites. Curation of the excavated artifacts or samples would occur as specified by the archaeologist. The archaeological resources assessment shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to project approval.
The City shall review and approve the
archeological resources assessment
submitted by the applicant and
prepared by a qualified archaeologist.
If site-specific archaeological
mitigation is identified, the City shall
ensure that such measures are
implemented or archaeological
resources are avoided to the extend
feasible.
Prior to submittal of
any discretionary
development
application that
involves ground
disturbance activities
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
768
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Environmental Impact Report 17
Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
CUL-3: Unanticipated Discoveries
An Archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology shall be present on-site during all earth disturbing activities. If cultural resources are encountered during ground-disturbing activities, work within 100 feet of the area shall be halted and the contractor shall contact an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology in either prehistoric or historic archaeology immediately to evaluate the find. If necessary, the evaluation may require preparation of a treatment plan and archaeological testing for CRHR eligibility. If the discovery proves to be significant under CEQA and cannot be avoided by the project, additional work, such as excavating the cultural deposit to fully characterize its extent and collecting and curating artifacts may be warranted to
mitigate any significant impacts to cultural resources. If archaeological resources of Native American origin are
identified during construction, a qualified archaeologist will consult with the City to begin Native American consultation procedures. Periodic reports of the find and subsequent evaluations shall be submitted to the City during
construction.
The City shall review reports of any
unanticipated findings and
subsequent evaluations, and ensure
that work is stopped and consultation
commences if resources are
discovered.
During construction As needed
during
construction
City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
CUL-4: Human Remains
In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, Health
and Safety Code Section 7050.5, and Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 shall be followed. If during project construction, there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken:
There shall be no further excavation or disturbance
within 100 feet of the remains until the County Coroner is contacted to determine whether the remains are
Native American and if an investigation of the cause of death is required. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Coroner shall contact the
Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24
hours, and the NAHC shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the Most Likely Descendant (MLD) of
the deceased Native American. The MLD may make
recommendations to the landowner or the person
responsible for the excavation work within 48 hours, for The City shall verify that , CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.5, Health
and Safety Code Section 7050.5, and
Public Resources Code Sections
5097.94 and Section 5097.98 are
followed in the event of an accidental
discovery or recognition of any
human remains.
During construction As needed
during
construction
City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
769
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
18 Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate
dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave
goods as provided in Public Resource Code Section
5097.98.
Where the following conditions occur, the landowner or
authorized representative shall rebury the Native
American human remains and associated grave goods
with appropriate dignity either in accordance with the
recommendations of the MLD or on the project site in a
location not subject to further subsurface disturbance:
▪ The NAHC is unable to identify an MLD or the MLD
failed to make a recommendation within 48 hours
after being notified by the commission.
▪ The descendant identified fails to make a
recommendation.
▪ The landowner or authorized representative rejects
the recommendation of the descendant, and
mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures
acceptable to the landowner.
Additionally, California Public Resources Code Section
15064.5 requires the following relative to Native American Remains:
▪ When an initial study identifies the existence of, or the probable likelihood of, Native American Remains within
a project, a lead agency shall work with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC as provided
in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The applicant may each develop a plan with respect to their respective individual development proposals for treating or
disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human
remains, and any items associated with Native American
Burials with the appropriate Native Americans as
identified by the NAHC.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
GHG-1: Construction GHG BMPs
Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the project applicant shall provide the City of American Canyon with documentation (e.g., site plans) demonstrating
implementation of construction Best Management Practices (BMPS). Measures may include but are not limited to:
▪ At least 15 percent of the construction fleet for each project phase shall be alternatively fueled or electric.
The City shall review documentation
demonstrating that project
construction includes construction
BMPs. City shall incorporate
applicable BMPs as conditions or
approval, permit conditions, or other
enforceable actions.
Prior to the issuance of
any grading permits
Periodically
during
construction
City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
770
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Environmental Impact Report 19
Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
▪ At least 10 percent of building materials used for project construction shall be sourced from local suppliers.
▪ At least 65 percent of construction and demolition waste materials shall be recycled or reused.
▪ At least one contractor that has a business location in American Canyon shall be contracted for project
construction.
▪ All construction contracts shall include language that requires all off-road equipment with a power rating
below 19 kilowatts (e.g., plate compactors, pressure
washers) using during construction be electrically
powered.
▪ Architectural coatings used for project construction shall be “Low-VOC,” containing no greater than 50 grams of
volatile organic compounds (VOC) per liter of product.
▪ Project construction shall prohibit the use of generators and shall establish grid power connection to electrical equipment needs.
▪ Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting
equipment off when not in use or reducing the
maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the
California Airborne Toxics Control Measure [ATCM] Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations). Clear signage regarding idling restrictions shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.
▪ All construction equipment shall be maintained and
properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s
specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a
certified mechanic and determined to be running in
proper condition prior to operation.
▪ The prime construction contractor shall post a publicly visible sign with their telephone number and contractor to contact. The construction contractor shall take
corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD’s phone
number shall also be identified and visible to ensure
compliance with applicable regulations.
GHG-2: Adopt and Implement a CEQA GHG Emissions Threshold:
The City shall include and implement a new 2040 General Plan policy under the Environment Element to prepare,
adopt, and implement a CEQA GHG Emissions threshold of
significance. The City shall adopt the CEQA GHG Emissions threshold of significance by the end of 2025 for use in future The City shall include and implement
a new 2040 General Plan Policy to
adopt the CEQA GHG Emissions
threshold of significance for use by
end of 2025 for use in future CEQA
By the end of 2025. Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
771
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
20 Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
CEQA GHG emissions analyses through 2030. In addition,
upon completion of future CAO updates and as necessary, the City shall update the CEQA GHG Emissions threshold of significance and American Canyon CEQA GHG Checklist to be consistent with each CAP update.
GHG emissions analyses through
2030.
Development
Department
GHG-3: Adopt American Canyon CAP to Meet the State’s 2030 and 2045 GHG Emissions Goals The City shall draft and adopt the American Canyon qualified CAP by the end of 2025 to outline how American Canyon will meet the State’s 2030 goal of 40 percent below 1990
emissions levels and 2045 goal of carbon neutrality.
Implementation measures in the updated qualified CAP to achieve the 2030 and 2045 goals may include, but are not limited to, the following:
▪ Develop and adopt Zero Net Energy requirements for
new and remodeled residential and non-residential
development;
▪ Develop and adopt a building electrification ordinance for existing and proposed structures;
▪ Expand charging infrastructure and parking for electric vehicles;
▪ Implement carbon sequestration by expanding the urban forest, participating in soil-based or compost application sequestration initiatives, supporting regional open space protection, and/or incentivizing rooftop gardens; and
▪ Implement policies and measures included in the
California 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan, such as
mobile source strategies for increasing clean transit
options and zero emissions vehicles by providing electric vehicle charging stations.
The City shall draft and adopt the
American Canyon qualified CAP by
the end of 2025 to outline the State’s
2030 goal of 40 percent below 1990
emissions levels and 2045 goal of
carbon neutrality.
By the end of 2025. Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
772
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Environmental Impact Report 21
Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
Noise
NOI-1: Conduct Construction Noise Analysis:
The City shall review future development within 1,000 feet of a sensitive receiver, and where applicable, require the following feasible measures as standard conditions of
approval to reduce construction noise levels below a level of significance:
▪ Mufflers. During excavation and grading construction
phases, all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be operated with closed engine doors and shall be
equipped with properly operating and maintained
mufflers consistent with manufacturers’ standards.
▪ Stationary Equipment. All stationary construction
equipment shall be placed so that emitted noise is
directed away from the nearest sensitive receivers.
▪ Equipment Staging Areas. Equipment staging shall be
located in areas that will create the greatest distance feasible between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receivers.
▪ Smart Back-up Alarms. Mobile construction equipment
shall have smart back-up alarms that automatically
adjust the sound level of the alarm in response to
ambient noise levels. Alternatively, back-up alarms shall be disabled and replaced with human spotters to ensure
safety when mobile construction equipment is moving in
the reverse direction in compliance with applicable
safety laws and regulations.
▪ Electrically-Powered Tools and Facilities. Electrical power shall be used to run air compressors and similar
power tools and to power any temporary structures,
such as construction trailers or caretaker facilities, where feasible.
▪ Noise Disturbance Coordinator. The project applicant
shall designate a “noise disturbance coordinator”
responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator shall
determine the cause of any noise complaint and shall
require that reasonable measures be implemented to
correct the problem. A telephone number for the
disturbance coordinator and the City shall be posted at the construction site.
Applicant shall provide the City with
project plans indicating compliance
with applicable noise reduction
measures. City shall confirm
applicable measures are
implemented during project
construction.
Prior to project
approval
Once before
construction
and then
periodically
during
construction
City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
773
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
22 Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
▪ Temporary Noise Barriers. Erect temporary noise
barriers, where feasible, when construction noise is
predicted to exceed the City’s construction standards
and when the anticipated construction duration is
greater than is typical (e.g., two years or greater).
Temporary noise barriers shall be constructed with solid materials (e.g., wood) with a density of at least 1.5
pounds per square foot with no gaps from the ground to
the top of the barrier. If a sound blanket is used, barriers shall be constructed with solid material with a density of at least 1 pound per square foot with no gaps from the
ground to the top of the barrier and be lined on the
construction side with acoustical blanket, curtain or
equivalent absorptive material rated sound transmission class (STC) 32 or higher.
NOI-2: Implement Roadway Vehicle Noise Reduction Measures The City shall install “quiet pavement” roadway
improvements, such as rubberized asphalt or open grade
asphalt concrete overlays along impacted roadway segments (American Canyon Road east of Flosden Road and west of I80; Flosden Road south of American Canyon Road; and Newell Drive north of American Canyon Road). The program may be funded by “fair share” developer contributions for proposed projects along impacted roadways to pay for the “quiet pavement” roadway improvements.
The City shall install “quiet
pavement” roadway improvements
such as rubberized asphalt or open
grade asphalt concrete overalys along
impacted roadway segments.
Prior to project
approval
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
NOI-3: Construction Vibration Control Plan
Prior to issuance of a building permit for a project that includes the following, the project applicant shall prepare a groundborne noise and vibration analysis to assess and
mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these construction activities.
▪ Pile driving within:
▪ 135 feet of fragile structures such as historical
resources;
▪ 100 feet of non-engineered timber and masonry
buildings (e.g., most residential buildings); or
▪ 75 feet of engineered concrete and masonry (no
plaster);
▪ A vibratory roller within:
▪ 40 feet of fragile historical resources; or
The project applicant shall prepare a
groundborne noise and vibration
analysis to assess and mitigate
potential noise and vibration impacts.
The noise and vibration analysis shall
be conducted by a qualified and
experienced acoustical consultant or
engineer.
Prior to issuance of
building permit
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
774
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Environmental Impact Report 23
Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
▪ 25 feet of any other structure
▪ A dozer or other large earthmoving equipment within:
▪ 20 feet for a fragile historical structure; or
▪ 15 feet of any other structure
The noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer.
The vibration levels shall not exceed FTA architectural damage thresholds (e.g., 0.12 in/sec PPV for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non-engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for
engineered concrete and masonry). If vibration levels would exceed this threshold, alternative uses such as drilling piles as opposed to pile driving, static rollers as opposed to vibratory rollers, and lower horsepower earthmoving
equipment shall be used. If necessary, construction vibration monitoring shall be conducted to ensure FTA vibration
thresholds are not exceeded.
Paleontological Resources
PAL-1: Retention of Qualified Professional Paleontologist Prior to submittal of a discretionary development application in areas underlain by high or undetermined sensitivity
geologic units (i.e., Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits; Markley Sandstone; Jameson Shale Member of Markley Sandstone;
Domengine Sandstone; and sandstone and shale of the Great Valley Complex), the City shall require a Qualified
Professional Paleontologist [as defined by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) (2010)] be retained to
determine the project’s potential to significantly impact paleontological resources according to SVP (2010) standards.
If necessary, the Qualified Professional Paleontologist shall recommend mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to paleontological resources to a less than significant level.
The City shall review and approve the Qualified Professional Paleontologist’s findings and recommendation. All
recommendations shall be incorporated into the project
plans prior to issuance of a grading permit.
The project applicant shall retain a
Qualified Professional Paleontologist
to determine the project’s potential
impact to paleontological resources.
If necessary, the Qualified
Professional Paleontologist shall
recommend mitigation measures tor
educe potential impacts to
paleontological resources to a less
than significant level. The City shall
review and approve the Qualified
Professional Paleontologist’s findings
and recommendations. All
recommendations shall be
incorporated into the project plans
prior to issuance of a grading permit.
Prior to submittal of a
discretionary
development
application.
Once City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
775
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
24 Mitigation Measure/
Implementation Program Action Required Timing
Monitoring
Frequency
Responsible
Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initial
Compliance
Verification
Date
Compliance
Verification
Comments
Wildfire
WF-1: Wildfire Risk Reduction During Construction
For projects located in proximity to agricultural or
undeveloped areas (including hillside areas) with flammable vegetation, prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit
documentation that they will implement the following
measures to reduce risk of loss, injury, or death from wildfire during construction:
1. Construction equipment powered by internal
combustion engines shall be equipped with spark
arresters. The spark arresters shall be maintained
pursuant to manufacturer recommendations to ensure
adequate performance.
2. Certain project construction activities with potential to ignite wildfires during red-flag warnings issued by the National Weather Service for the project site location
shall be prohibited. Example activities that shall be
prohibited during red-flag warnings include welding and grinding outside of enclosed buildings.
3. Fire extinguishers shall be required to be onsite during construction. Fire extinguishers shall be maintained to function according to manufacturer specifications.
Construction personnel shall receive training on the
proper methods of using a fire extinguisher.
The applicant shall provide the City
with their applicable wildfire
reduction measures, in accordance
with the mitigation measure. The City
shall confirm that the measures are
properly implemented at the
construction site.
Prior to issuance of a
grading or building
permit, whichever
occurs first
Periodically
during
construction
City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department
WF-2: Fire Resistant Vegetation and Landscaping
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit landscape plans prepared by a registered Landscape Architect that are consistent with applicable Building and Fire Codes at the time the building permit is issued.
The City shall review landscape plans
prepared by a registered Landscape
Architect to ensure consistency with
applicable Building and Fire Codes.
Prior to issuance of a
building permit
Once prior to
building
permit, then
again to
confirm
landscaping
was properly
installed
City of
American
Canyon
Community
Development
Department &
AC Fire
District
776
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Environmental Impact Report 25
777
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations SCH# 2022070038
prepared by
City of American Canyon
4381 Broadway Street, Suite 201
American Canyon, California 94503
Contact: Brent Cooper, AICP, Community Development Director prepared with the assistance of
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
449 15th Street, Suite 303
Oakland, California 94612
March 2025
ATTACHMENT 1, EXHIBIT E
778
Table of Contents
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations i Table of Contents
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Project Description ....................................................................................................................... 3 3 Project Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 4 4 Findings of Fact ............................................................................................................................ 5
4.2.1 Aesthetics – Impact AES-4 .................................................................................... 5
4.2.2 Air Quality – Impact AQ-3..................................................................................... 6
4.2.3 Air Quality – Impact AQ-4..................................................................................... 8
4.2.4 Biological Resources – Impact BIO-1 .................................................................... 9
4.2.5 Cultural Resources – Impact CUL-1 ....................................................................15
4.2.6 Cultural Resources – Impact CUL-2 ....................................................................16
4.2.7 Cultural Resources – Impact CUL-3 ....................................................................17
4.2.8 Noise – Impact NOI-2 .........................................................................................19
4.2.9 Paleontolgoical Resources – Impact PAL-1 ........................................................20
4.2.10 Wildfire – Impact W-2 ........................................................................................20
4.3.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Impact GHG 1 ......................................................22
4.3.2 Noise – Impact NOI-1 .........................................................................................24
4.3.3 Transportation – Impact TRA-2 ..........................................................................25 5 Project Alternatives ....................................................................................................................26 6 Statement of Overriding Considerations ...................................................................................30 7 Statement of Location and Custodian of Documents................................................................32 779
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
ii
This page intentionally left blank.
780
Introduction
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 1 1 Introduction
A Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) was prepared for the American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update (project), and the City of American Canyon (City) filed a notice of completion (NOC) with the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research to begin the 45-day public review period (Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21161), which began on September 27, 2024, and ended on December 27, 2024. The Draft EIR was made available on the City’s website.1 In addition, the Draft EIR was made available for review at the City’s offices at 4381 Broadway Street, Suite 201; the City Library at 300 Crawford Way; and the Active Adults Center at 2185 Elliot Drive. As a result of these notification efforts, the City received eight written comments on the content of the Draft EIR.
After close of the Draft EIR public review and comment period, a Final EIR consisting of responses to comments and minor revisions to the Draft EIR was prepared for City Council. On May 20, 2025, the City Council, at a public hearing, is expected to decide on the certification of the Final EIR and approval of the project. The public hearing will be simultaneously held virtually and in person.
The Findings of Fact (Findings) and Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) presented herein address the environmental effects associated with the project that are described and analyzed within the Final EIR, reflect the Council’s determinations about feasible mitigation measures, and the adequacy of the Final EIR. These Findings have been made pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), specifically Public Resources Code Sections 21081 and 21081.6, as well as the CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR 15000 et seq.) Sections 15091 and 15093.
Public Resources Code Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 require that the City, as the Lead Agency for this project, prepare written findings for any identified significant environmental effects along with a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. Specific findings under CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a) are:
(1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR. (2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. (3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR.
Furthermore, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, whenever significant effects cannot be mitigated to below a level of significance, the City as the decision-making agency is required to balance, as applicable, the benefits of the project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of a project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse effects may be considered “acceptable,” in which case the lead agency must adopt a formal SOC. 1 Draft EIR for the project is available here: https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=232476&repo=r-f53bdda4 781
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
2 The Final EIR identified potentially significant environmental effects that could result from the project but could be reduced to a less than significant level through implementation of mitigation measures. Those effects were related to aesthetics (impacts related to anticipated construction and operational lighting from development between now and the 2040 plan horizon year), air quality (impacts related to exposing sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations and odors), biological resources (impacts to special status species), cultural resources (impacts related to historical structures, archaeological resources, and human remains), noise (impacts related to groundborne vibration), paleontological resources, and wildfire (impacts related to exposing people and structures to wildfire risk).
Significant and unavoidable impacts associated with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (impacts related to conflicts with state GHG reduction goals), noise (impacts related to construction noise and operational traffic noise), and transportation (impacts related to vehicle miles traveled [VMT]) were identified because mitigation measures would not reduce impacts to a less than significant level, and thus a statement of overriding considerations is required. 782
Project Description
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 3 2 Project Description
The project is an update to the City’s current General Plan, which includes the following chapters:
Introduction, Land Use Element, Housing Element, Economic Development Element, Mobility (Circulation) Element, Utilities Element, Public Services and Facilities Element, Parks and Recreation Element, Natural and Historic & Cultural Resources Element, Geology Element, Flood Hazards Element, and Noise Element.
The General Plan (project) establishes the City’s vision for future development through the horizon year of 2040. The General Plan will serve as the City’s primary guide for future land use and development decisions in a way that meets the community needs and priorities while serving as a key tool for influencing and improving the quality of life for residents and businesses. As such, it serves as the “blueprint” for future development and conservation of a community. The 2040 General Plan Update will help the City plan for important community issues, such as community growth; health, housing, mobility, and infrastructure needs; climate change; and environmental protection. It will also set the stage for future social, physical, and economic development of the City.
The project would change some of the land use designations; however, these changes primarily resolve inconsistences between existing uses and the General Plan land use designations. As a part of the project, the City would consider an update to the Urban Limit Line to include the Hess/Laird Property and two parcels located in the vicinity of S. Kelly Road and State Route (SR) 29.
Consideration of an expansion of the Urban Limit Line is an administrative process that would not result in an environmental impacts and is not discussed in the Final EIR. Overall, compared to existing conditions, the project could add 3,379 residential units and approximately 5,704,000 square feet of commercial, retail, hotel, industrial, warehouse, and research and development (R&D) uses.
The project includes a Mobility Element, which provides a vision and guiding principles for the transportation system. The Mobility Element identifies the following proposed major circulation improvements in American Canyon:
The City partnership with the Napa Valley Transportation Authority to identify improvements to SR 29, including landscaping improvements, pedestrian improvements, and multimodal features.
Newell Drive extension from Watson Ranch to Highway 29 at Green Island Road (2-Lane Major Collector Road and 4-Lane Arterial)
Green Island Road reconstruction from a 2-lane Arterial to a 3-Lane Arterial West Side Connector (2-Lane Major Collector)
Eucalyptus Drive extension from Theresa Avenue to Broadway (2-Lane Major Collector) Rio Del Mar or South Napa Junction Road, including new at-grade crossing from Broadway to Newell Drive (2-Lane Major Collector)
Napa Junction Road from Theresa Avenue to Hess Road (2-Lane Minor Collector) Newell Drive Railroad Overcrossing
American Canyon Road Pedestrian Crossing
Donaldson Way Pedestrian Crossing
Napa Junction Road Pedestrian Crossing
783
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
4 3 Project Objectives
The Technical 2040 General Plan will serve as a long-term framework for future growth and development, represents the community’s view of its future, and contains the goals and policies upon with the City Council, Planning Commission, and the entire community will base land use and resource decisions. The Technical 2040 General Plan will provide a contemporary plan that will guide American Canyon though the next 20 years and comply with State General Plan guidelines and law.
The Technical 2040 General Plan identifies the following three fundamental roles of the City:
1. The City should be home for a residential population, internally accommodating a sufficient range of uses to support the needs of residents (including a mix of housing types, commercial services, entertainment, employment, recreation, education, health, religious, cultural facilities, transportation services, and open space). At the present time, many of these uses are located outside the City, which necessitates extensive travel by residents to access these services.
2. The City should be a center of employment and commerce for regional, as well as local residents.
This will provide an opportunity to capitalize upon: (1) the cluster of uses which have developed in the Green Island Industrial Park; (2) the proximity of the City to the Napa County Airport and Southern Pacific railroad, and (3) the relationship of the City to the agricultural and vineyard industries of Napa County.
3. The City can capture visitors to the Napa Valley by providing uses which capitalize on the unique environmental setting of the foothills, river valleys, and agriculture. Environmental educational facilities, such as wetlands interpretative centers, overnight camping and recreational vehicle facilities, river recreational facilities such as boating, golf courses, and hotel/motels and restaurants are representative of the range of uses which may be considered. 784
Findings of Fact
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 5 4 Findings of Fact
Having received, reviewed, and considered the information in the Final EIR for this project, as well as the supporting administrative record, the City of American Canyon makes findings pursuant to, and in accordance with, Sections 21081, 21081.5, and 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code.
Environmental Effects Found Not to be Significant
Through project scoping and the environmental analysis contained within the Final EIR, it was determined that the project would not result in potentially significant effects on the environment for all CEQA Appendix G checklist questions related to land use and planning, population and housing, public services and recreation, utilities and service systems, and tribal cultural resources. In addition, it was determined that the project would not result in potentially significant effects on the environment for CEQA Appendix G checklist questions within the following issue areas:
Aesthetics (impacts to scenic vistas, state scenic highways, and conflicts with zoning) Air quality (impacts related to consistency with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s 2017 Clean Air Plan and net increases in criteria pollutants) Biological resources (impacts to riparian habitat and sensitive natural communities, fish and wildlife migration, conflicts with policies designed to protect biological resources, and conflicts with an adopted habitat conservation plan)
Noise (impacts related to airport noise)
Transportation (impacts related to conflicts with policies addressing the circulation system, increasing transportation hazards, and resulting in inadequate emergency access) Wildfire (impacts related to emergency access, installation of utilities, and risks associated with post-fire instability).
No further findings are required for these subject areas.
Findings for Significant but Mitigated Effects
The following findings are hereby made by the City of American Canyon for the significant but mitigable environmental effects identified in the EIR related to aesthetics (impacts related to additional construction and operational lighting), air quality (impacts related to exposing sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations and odors), biological resources (impacts to special status species), cultural resources (impacts related to historical structures, archaeological resources, and human remains), noise (impacts related to groundborne vibration), paleontological resources, and wildfire (impacts related to exposing people and structures to wildfire risk).
4.2.1 Aesthetics – Impact AES-4
Construction and operation of future development facilitated by the project could create new sources of light or glare that could adversely affect the visual environment. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation.
785
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
6 Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][1]). Implementation of Mitigation Measures AES-1 and AES-2 would reduce potential impacts related to additional construction and operational lighting to a less than significant level.
Explanation
Implementation of Mitigation Measure AES-1 would require a construction lighting plan for projects that would require nighttime construction and Mitigation Measure AES-2 would require the preparation of a photometric plan. Implementation of Mitigation Measures AES-1 and AES-2 would ensure that lighting and glare is minimized during construction and operation of future development. With implementation of Mitigation Measures AES-1 and AES-2, impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measure
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, the following mitigation measures have been included in a MMRP that is to be adopted concurrently with these findings.
AES-1 Construction Lighting Plan
Prior to nighttime construction, if needed for a particular project, project applicants shall submit a construction lighting plan to the City for review and approval. The construction lighting plan shall ensure that the minimum amount of lighting is used to meet safety requirements and ensure no spillover occurs to nearby sensitive uses. All lighting shall be directed downward and away from surrounding land uses.
AES-2 Operational Lighting Plan
Prior to discretionary project approval, the project applicant shall prepare and submit a photometric plan to the City for review and approval which demonstrates that all exterior light fixtures will be directed downward or employ full cut-off fixtures to prevent light spillage. The approved plan shall be incorporated into project design plans.
4.2.2 Air Quality – Impact AQ-3
Construction activities for projects lasting longer than two months or located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
Implementation of the project may also expose sensitive receptors to operational sources of toxic air contaminants. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][1]). Implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 through AQ-3 would reduce potential impacts related to exposing sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations to a less than significant level.
786
Findings of Fact
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 7 Explanation
Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 requires the preparation of construction health risk assessments for developments that meet specific criteria and implementation of measures to reduce construction emissions. Mitigation Measures AQ-2 requires the preparation of operational health risk assessments for development that places sensitive receptors within 500 feet of a major source of toxic air contaminants and implementation of measures to reduce exposure to toxic air contaminants. Mitigation Measures AQ-3 requires the preparation of operational health risk assessments for industrial, warehousing, and commercial land uses that meet specific criteria and implementation of measures to reduce operational emissions.
Mitigation Measure
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, the following mitigation measures have been included in a MMRP that is to be adopted concurrently with these findings.
AQ-1 Conduct Construction Health Risk Assessment
Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit to the City a construction health risk assessment (HRA) in accordance with BAAQMD recommendations for any development project that has at least one the following characteristics:
The project is located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors. Project construction would last longer than two months. Project construction would not utilize equipment rated USEPA Tier 4 (for equipment of 50 horsepower or more); construction equipment fitted with Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (for all equipment of 50 horsepower or more); or alternative fuel construction equipment.
If the HRA determines that construction will exceed BAAQMD significance thresholds, the HRA shall provide mitigation measures to reduce the impact to less than significant, including but not limited to requiring the use of Tier 4 engines, Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters, and/or alternative fuel construction equipment.
AQ-2 Reduce operational Toxic Air Contaminants Near Sensitive Receptors For new sensitive receptors proposed within 500 feet of a major source of TAC (high-volume roadways with 10,000 vehicles or more per day), the project applicant shall prepare an operational health risk assessment for the City’s review and approval. If TAC exposure at new sensitive receptor sites would exceed BAAQMD health risk thresholds, the project applicant shall include mechanical air filtration or other measures to reduce health risk exposure to acceptable levels.
AQ-3 Conduct Operational Health Risk Assessment
Prior to permit approval for industrial, warehousing, or commercial land uses that would generate at least 100 diesel trucks per day or 40 or more trucks with diesel-powered transport refrigeration units per day, the applicant shall submit an operational health risk assessment (HRA) or submit proof that an HRA is not required in accordance with BAAQMD thresholds to the City for review and approval. If required by the City, the operational HRA shall be prepared in accordance with the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and BAAQMD requirements, and impacts shall be mitigated to an acceptable level. Typical measures to reduce risk impacts may include, but are not limited to:
787
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
8 Restricting idling on-site beyond Air Toxic Control Measures idling restrictions, as feasible. Electrifying warehousing docks.
Truck Electric Vehicle (EV) Capable trailer spaces.
Requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles.
Restricting off-site truck travel through the creation of truck routes.
The operational HRA shall be provided to the City for review and concurrence prior to project approval.
4.2.3 Air Quality – Impact AQ-4
The project would not create objectionable odors that could adversely affect a substantial number of people. Impacts related to odors would be less than significant with mitigation.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][1]). Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-4 would reduce potential impacts related to odors to a less than significant level.
Explanation
Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-4 requires the preparation of an odor management plan for projects with potential to emit nuisance odors beyond the project’s property line. Odor impacts would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-4.
Mitigation Measure
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, the following mitigation measures have been included in a MMRP that is to be adopted concurrently with these findings.
AQ-4 Reduce Operational Odor Impacts
Prior to discretionary approval by the City, if it is determined by the City that a development project has the potential to emit nuisance odors beyond the property line, the project applicant shall prepare an odor management plan and submit it to the City for review and approval. Facilities that have the potential to generate nuisance odors include, but are not limited to:
Wastewater treatment plants
Composting, green waste, or recycling facilities
Fiberglass manufacturing facilities
Painting/coating operations
Large-capacity coffee roasters
Food-processing facilities
The odor management plan shall demonstrate compliance with the latest BAAQMD screening distances and guidelines. The odor management plan shall identify the best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs) that will be utilized to reduce potential odors to acceptable levels, 788
Findings of Fact
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 9 including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. T-BACTs may include but are not limited to scrubbers (i.e., air pollution control devices) at the industrial facility. T-BACTs identified in the odor management plan shall be identified as mitigation measures in the documents prepared for the development project and/or incorporated into the project’s site plan.
4.2.4 Biological Resources – Impact BIO-1
The project could have the potential to have an adverse impact on special status species.
Implementation of federal, state, and local regulations and policies, as well as Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO-9, would ensure development facilitated by the project would not have a substantial adverse effect on candidate, sensitive, or special status species. This impact would be less than significant with mitigation.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][1]). Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO-9 would reduce potential impacts related to special-status species to a less than significant level.
Explanation
Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 through BIO-9 would reduce potential impacts to special-status species, nesting birds, and roosting bats to a less than significant level by requiring Biological Resources Screening and Assessments, avoidance and minimization, habitat restoration, and preconstruction surveys.
Mitigation Measure
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, the following mitigation measures have been included in a MMRP that is to be adopted concurrently with these findings.
BIO-1 Biological Resources Screening and Assessment
For projects proposed within undeveloped parcels, the City shall require project applicants to engage a qualified biologist (having the appropriate education and experience level) to perform a baseline Biological Resources Screening and Assessment to determine whether projects proposed within undeveloped parcels have any potential to impact special-status biological resources, inclusive of special-status plants and animals, sensitive vegetation communities (including vernal pools and other wetlands), and critical habitat. If it is determined that the project has no potential to impact biological resources, no further action is required. If the project would have the potential to impact biological resources, prior to construction, a qualified biologist shall conduct a projectspecific biological analysis to document the existing biological resources within a project footprint plus a minimum buffer of 500 feet around the project footprint, as is feasible, and to determine the potential impacts to those resources. The project-specific biological analysis shall evaluate the potential for impacts to all biological resources including, but not limited to special-status species, nesting birds, wildlife movement, sensitive plant communities, critical habitats, and other resources judged to be sensitive by local, state, and/or federal agencies. If the project would have the potential to impact these resources, the following mitigation measures (mitigation measures BIO-2 through BIO-8) shall be incorporated, as applicable, to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. 789
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
10 Pending the results of the project-specific biological analysis, design alterations, further technical studies (e.g., protocol surveys) and consultations with the USFWS, CDFW, and/or other local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Note that specific surveys described in the mitigation measures below may be completed as part of the project-specific biological analysis where suitable habitat is present.
BIO-2 Special-status Plant Species Surveys
If the project-specific Biological Resources Screening and Assessment (Mitigation Measure BIO-1) determines that there is potential for significant impacts to federally or state-listed plants or regional population level impacts to species with a CRPR of 1B or 2B from project development, a qualified biologist shall complete surveys for special-status plants prior to any vegetation removal, grubbing, or other construction activity (including staging and mobilization). The surveys shall be floristic in nature and shall be seasonally timed to coincide with the target species. All plant surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist during the blooming season prior to development permit approval. All special-status plant species identified on site shall be mapped onto a site-specific aerial photograph or topographic map with the use of Global Positioning System unit. Surveys shall be conducted in accordance with the most current protocols established by the CDFW, USFWS, and the local jurisdictions if said protocols exist. A report of the survey results shall be submitted to the City, and the CDFW and/or USFWS, as appropriate, for review and/or approval.
BIO-3 Special-status Plant Species Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation If federally and/or state-listed or CRPR 1B or 2 species are found during special-status plant surveys (pursuant to Mitigation Measure BIO-2), and would be directly impacted, or there would be a population-level impact to non-listed sensitive species, then the project shall be re-designed to avoid impacting those plant species, where feasible. Rare and listed plant occurrences that are not within the immediate disturbance footprint but are located within 50 feet of disturbance limits shall have bright orange protective fencing installed at least 30 feet beyond their extent, or other distance as approved by a qualified biologist, to protect them from harm.
BIO-4 Habitat Restoration Plan
If federally or state-listed plants or non-listed special-status CRPR 1B and 2 plant populations identified during special status plant surveys (pursuant to Mitigation Measure BIO-2), cannot be avoided, and will be impacted by development, all impacts shall be mitigated by the applicant at a ratio not lower than 1:1 per acre of impact (and 1:1 per tree), and to be determined by the City (in coordination with CDFW and USFWS as and if applicable) for each species as a component of habitat restoration. A qualified biologist shall prepare and submit a restoration plan to the City for review and approval prior to City approval of project plans. (Note: if a federally and/or state-listed plant species will be impacted, the restoration plan shall be submitted to the USFWS and/or CDFW for review, and federal and/or state take authorization may be required by these agencies.) The restoration plan shall include, at a minimum, the following components:
1. Description of the project/impact site (i.e., location, responsible parties, areas to be impacted by habitat type).
2. Goal(s) of the compensatory mitigation project (type[s] and area[s]) of habitat to be established, restored, enhanced, and/or preserved; specific functions and values of habitat type[s] to be established, restored, enhanced, and/or preserved).
790
Findings of Fact
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 11
3. Description of the proposed compensatory mitigation site (location and size, ownership status, existing functions, and values).
4. Implementation plan for the compensatory mitigation site (rationale for expecting implementation success, responsible parties, schedule, site preparation, planting plan).
5. Maintenance activities during the monitoring period, including weed removal as appropriate (activities, responsible parties, schedule).
6. Monitoring plan for the compensatory mitigation site, including no lessthan quarterly monitoring for the first year (performance standards, target functions and values, target acreages to be established, restored, enhanced, and/or preserved, annual monitoring reports).
7. Success criteria based on the goals and measurable objectives; said criteria to be, at a minimum, at least 80 percent survival of container plants and 30 percent relative cover by vegetation type or other industry standards as determined by a qualified restoration specialist.
8. An adaptive management program and remedial measures to address any shortcomings in meeting success criteria.
9. Notification of completion of compensatory mitigation and agency confirmation.
10. Contingency measures(initiating procedures, alternative locationsfor contingency compensatory mitigation, funding mechanism).
11. All nursery plants used in restoration shall be inspected for sudden oak death.
BIO-5 Endangered/Threatened Special-status Species Habitat Assessments and Protocol Surveys
If the results of the project-specific biological analysis (Mitigation Measure BIO-1) determine that suitable habitat may be present for federal or state listed, candidate, or proposed species, protocol habitat assessments/surveys shall be completed in accordance with current CDFW and/or USFWS protocols prior to issuance of any construction permits. If, through consultation with the CDFW and/or USFWS, it is determined that protocol habitat assessments/surveys are not required, the applicant shall complete and document this consultation and submit it to the City prior to issuance of any construction permits. Each protocol has different survey and timing requirements. The applicant shall be responsible for ensuring they understand the protocol requirements and shall hire a qualified biologist to conduct protocol surveys. (Note: if a federally and/or state-listed wildlife species will be impacted, federal and/or state take authorization may be required by USFWS and CDFW.)
BIO-6 Endangered/Threatened Animal Species Avoidance and Minimization The following measures shall be applied to impacted aquatic and/or terrestrial animal species identified by the project-specific Biological Resources Screening and Assessment required under Mitigation Measure BIO-1.
1. Ground disturbance shall be limited to the minimum necessary to complete the project. A qualified biologist shall flag the project limits of disturbance. Areas of special biological concern within or adjacent to the limits of disturbance shall have highly visible orange construction fencing installed between said area and the limits of disturbance.
2. All projects occurring within/adjacent to aquatic habitats (including riparian habitats and wetlands) shall be completed between April 1 and October 31, if feasible, to avoid impacts to sensitive aquatic species. Any work outside these dates would require project-specific approval from the City and may be subject to regulatory agency approval. 791
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
12 3. All projects occurring within or adjacent to sensitive habitats that may support federally and/or state-listed endangered/threatened species shall have a CDFW- and/or USFWS-approved biologist present during all initial ground disturbing/vegetation clearing activities. Once initial ground disturbing/vegetation clearing activities have been completed,said biologistshall conduct daily pre-activity clearance surveys for endangered/threatened species. Alternatively, and upon approval of the CDFW and/or USFWS, said biologist may conduct site inspections at a minimum of once per week to ensure all prescribed avoidance and minimization measures are fully implemented.
4. No endangered/threatened species shall be captured and relocated without express permission from the CDFW and/or USFWS.
5. If at any time during project construction an endangered/threatened species enters the construction site or otherwise may be impacted by the project, all project activities shall cease. A CDFW/USFWS-approved biologist shall document the occurrence and consult with the CDFW and USFWS, as appropriate, to determine whether it was safe for project activities to resume.
6. For all work occurring in areas where endangered/threatened species may be present and are at risk of entering the project site during construction, the applicant shall install exclusion fencing along the project boundaries prior to start of construction (including staging and mobilization).
The placement of the fence shall be at the discretion of the CDFW/USFWS-approved biologist.
This fence shall consist of solid silt fencing placed at a minimum of three feet above grade and two feet below grade and shall be attached to wooden stakes placed at intervals of not more than five feet. The applicant shall inspect the fence weekly and following rain events and high wind events and shall be maintained in good working condition until all construction activities are complete.
7. All vehicle maintenance/fueling/staging shall occur not less than 100 feet from any riparian habitat or water body, including seasonal wetland features. Suitable containment procedures shall be implemented to prevent spills. A minimum of one spill kit shall be available at each work location near riparian habitat or water bodies.
8. No equipment shall be permitted to enter wetted portions of any affected drainage channel or wetland.
9. At the end of each workday, excavations shall be secured with a cover or a ramp provided to prevent wildlife entrapment.
10. All trenches, pipes, culverts, or similar structures shall be inspected for animals prior to burying, capping, moving, or filling.
11. Considering the potential for the project to impact federally and state-listed species and their habitat, the City shall contact CDFW and USFWS to identify mitigation banks within Napa County during project development. If the results of the project-specific biological analysis (Mitigation Measure BIO-1) determine that impacts to federally and state threatened or endangered species habitat are expected, City and/or applicant shall explore species-appropriate mitigation bank(s) servicing the region for purchase of mitigation credits.
12. Prior to grading and construction in natural areas of containing suitable upland habitat, a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey as determined necessary during the biological analysis (Mitigation Measure BIO-1). The survey should include a transect survey over the entire project disturbance footprint (including access and staging areas), and mapping ofsuitable habitat features, such as burrows, that are potentially suitable for listed species. If any listed species are detected, no work shall be conducted until the individual(s) leaves the site of their own accord, unless federal and/or state “take” authorization has been issued for relocation. Typical 792
Findings of Fact
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 13 preconstruction survey procedures, such as burrow scoping and burrow collapse, cannot be conducted without federal and state permits. If any life stage of listed species are found within the survey area, the City and/or applicant shall consult with the USFWS and CDFW to determine the appropriate course of action to comply with the FESA and CESA, if permits are not already in place at the time of construction.
BIO-7 Pre-Construction Bird Surveys, Avoidance, and Notification For all future development under the 2040 General Plan, construction activities initiated during the bird nesting season (February 1 – September 15), involving removal of vegetation (e.g. trees and shrubs), abandoned structures, or other nesting bird habitat, a pre-construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted no more than 5 days prior to initiation of ground disturbance and vegetation removal. The nesting bird pre-construction survey shall be conducted on foot and shall include a buffer around the construction site at a distance determined by a qualified biologist, including staging and storage areas. The minimum survey radii surrounding the work area shall be the following: 250 feet for non-raptors and 1,000 feet for raptors. The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist familiar with the identification of avian species known to occur in the American Canyon region. If construction lapses for seven days or longer, the qualified biologist shall conduct another focused survey before project activities are reinitiated. If nests are found, an avoidance buffer shall be determined by the biologist dependent upon the species, the proposed work activity, and existing disturbances associated with land uses outside of the site. The qualified biologist shall observe the active nest to establish a behavioral baseline of the adults and nestlings, if present. The qualified biologist shall continuously monitor the active nests to detect signs of disturbance and behavioral change as a result of construction impacts, such as noise, vibration, odors, or worker/equipment motion. If signs of disturbance and behavioral changes are observed, the qualified biologist shall cease work causing those changes and may contact CDFW or USFWS for guidance. The buffer shall be demarcated by the biologist with bright orange construction fencing, flagging, construction lathe, or other means to demarcate the boundary. All construction personnel shall be notified of the buffer zone as an “Ecologically Sensitive Area” and to avoid entering the buffer zone during the nesting season. No ground disturbing activities shall occur within the buffer until the biologist has confirmed that breeding/nesting is completed and the young have fledged the nest. Encroachment into the buffer shall occur only at the discretion of the qualified biologist on the basis that the encroachment will not be detrimental to an active nest. A report summarizing the pre-construction survey(s) shall be prepared by a qualified biologist and shall be submitted to the City prior to the commencement of construction activities.
Project site plans shall include a statement acknowledging compliance with the federal MBTA and California Fish and Game Code that includes avoidance of active bird nests and identification of Best Management Practices to avoid impacts to active nests, including checking for nests prior to construction activities during February 1 to September 15, and what to do if an active nest is found so that the nest is not inadvertently impacted during grading or construction activities.
BIO-8 Roosting Bat Surveys and Avoidance Prior to Removal For all future development under the 2040 General Plan that will require the removal of large trees (greater than 20 inches in diameter at five feet from the ground), abandoned buildings, bridges, or other suitable roosting structure identified during the Biological Resources Screening and Assessment (Mitigation Measure BIO-1), prior to tree and/or structure removal, a qualified biologist shall conduct a focused survey of all trees and structures to be removed or impacted by construction activities to determine whether active roosts of special-status bats are present on site. 793
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
14 Tree or structure removal shall be planned for either the spring or the fall, and timed to ensure both suitable conditions for the detection of bats and adequate time for tree and/or structure removal to occur during seasonal periods of bat activity exclusive of the breeding season, as described below.
Trees and/or structures containing suitable potential bat roost habitat features shall be clearly marked or identified. If no bat roosts are found, the results of the survey will be documented and submitted to the City within 30 days of the survey, after which no further action will be required.
If roosts are present, the biologist shall prepare a site-specific roosting bat protection plan to be implemented by the contractor following the City’s approval. Additionally, the qualified biologist shall determine compensatory mitigation for temporary or permanent habitat loss due to tree removal, in conjunction with CDFW. The plan shall incorporate the following guidance as appropriate:
When possible, removal of trees/structures identified as suitable roosting habitat shall be conducted during seasonal periods of bat activity, including the following:
Between September 1 and about October 15, or before evening temperatures fall below 45 degrees Fahrenheit and/or more than 0.5 inch of rainfall within 24 hours occurs. Between March 1 and April 15, or after evening temperatures rise above 45 degrees Fahrenheit and/or no more than 0.5 inch of rainfall within 24 hours occurs. If a tree/structure must be removed during the breeding season and is identified as potentially containing a colonial maternity roost, then a qualified biologist shall conduct acoustic emergence surveys or implement other appropriate methods to further evaluate if the roost is an active maternity roost. Under the biologist’s guidance, the contractor shall implement measures similar to or exceeding the following:
If it is determined that the roost is not an active maternity roost, then the roost may be removed in accordance with the other requirements of this measure. If it is found that an active maternity roost of a colonial roosting species is present, the roost shall not be disturbed during the breeding season (April 15 to August 31). Tree removal procedures shall be implemented using a two-step tree removal process. This method is conducted over two consecutive days and works by creating noise and vibration by cutting non-habitat branches and limbs from habitat trees using chainsaws only (no excavators or other heavy machinery) on day one. The noise and vibration disturbance, together with the visible alteration of the tree, is very effective in causing bats that emerge nightly to feed to not return to the roost that night. The remainder of the tree is removed on day two. Prior to the demolition of vacant structures within the project site, a qualified biologist shall conduct a focused habitat assessment of all structures to be demolished. The habitat assessment shall be conducted enough in advance to ensure the commencement of building demolition can be scheduled during seasonal periods of bat activity (see above), if required. If no signs of day roosting activity are observed, no further action will be required. If bats or signs of day roosting by bats are observed, a qualified biologist will prepare specific recommendations such as partial dismantling to cause bats to abandon the roost, or humane eviction, both to be conducted during seasonal periods of bat activity, if required. If the qualified biologist determines a roost is used by a large number of bats (large hibernaculum), bat boxes shall be installed near the project site. The number of bat boxes installed will depend on the size of the hibernaculum and shall be determined through consultation with CDFW. If a maternity colony has become established, all construction 794
Findings of Fact
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 15 activities shall be postponed within a 500-foot buffer around the maternity colony until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the young have dispersed. Once it has been determined that the roost is clear of bats, the roost shall be removed immediately.
BIO-9 Conduct Pre-construction Crotch’s Bumblebee surveys and Implement Avoidance Measures
If the results of the project-specific biological analysis (Mitigation Measure BIO-1) determine that suitable habitat may be present for Crotch’s bumble bee, a habitat assessment shall be performed by a qualified biologist knowledgeable and experienced with Crotch’s bumblebee and the habitat in which they occur. If the biologist determines that suitable habitat for Crotch’s bumblebee is present, a focused survey shall be performed during the species’ active flight period for Crotch’s bumblebee and peak blooming period of nectar and pollen sources (May 1 through July 31). The Crotch’s bumblebee survey shall be conducted on foot and shall encompass the entirety of a project site and focus on areas that allow for the highest probability of detection, such as high abundance nectar or pollen sources and rodent burrows that may be used for breeding and nesting. If Crotch’s bumblebee is determined to be present, the project proponent shall map the locations of the observed bumblebee, areas of abundant nectar or pollen sources, and any active nesting sites. A report summarizing the results of the habitat assessment and focused survey (if required) shall be prepared by the qualified biologist and shall be submitted to the City prior to the commencement of construction activities. Further, consultation with the CDFW will be necessary in the event Crotch’s bumblebee was observed within a project site and an Incidental Take Permit, in accordance with the California Endangered Species Act, may be required prior to initiating any ground disturbance on the site. If Crotch’s bumble bees are not listed and no longer candidates for listing at the time of project implementation, this mitigation measure would not be required.
4.2.5 Cultural Resources – Impact CUL-1
Development facilitated by the project could adversely affect previously unidentified historic-period resources. Impacts to historic-period resources would be less than significant with mitigation.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][1]). Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would reduce potential impacts related to historic period resources to a less than significant level.
Explanation
Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would ensure a historical resource evaluation is conducted for sites with age-eligible resources within the Planning Area and require measures to reduce impacts to historical resources to less than significant.
Mitigation Measures
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, the following mitigation measure have been included in a MMRP that is to be adopted concurrently with these findings. 795
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
16 CUL-1 Historical Built Environment
Prior to project approval, the applicant shall submit a report to the City that identifies any historicage features (i.e., structures over 45 years of age) proposed to be altered or demolished. If historical-age features are present, the applicant shall submit a historical resources evaluation to the City prepared in areas that contains buildings, structures, objects, sites, landscape/site plans, or other features that are 45 years of age or older, by a qualified architectural historian or historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards (PQS) in architectural history or history (36 CFR Part 61). The evaluation shall include an intensive-level evaluation, in accordance with the guidelines and best practices meeting the State Office of Historic Preservation guidelines. All evaluated properties shall be documented on Department of Parks and Recreation Series 523 Forms. The report shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.
If historical resources are identified through the survey and evaluation, efforts shall be made by the applicant to ensure that the relocation, rehabilitation, or alteration of the resource is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatments of Historic Properties (Standards).
The applicant shall submit a report to the City that identifies and specifies the treatment of character-defining features and construction activities, and demonstrates how the project complies with the Standards and avoids the substantial adverse change in the significance of the historical resource as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b). The report shall be prepared by an architectural historian or historical architect meeting the PQS as defined by 36 CFR Part 61 and provided to the City for review and concurrence prior to project approval.
4.2.6 Cultural Resources – Impact CUL-2
Development facilitated by the project could adversely affect previously unidentified archaeological resources. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][1]). Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-2 and CUL-3 would reduce potential impacts related to archaeological resources to a less than significant level.
Explanation
Mitigation Measures CUL-2 and CUL-3 would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level by requiring the identification and evaluation of any archaeological resources that may be present prior to construction and by providing steps for the evaluation and protection of unanticipated finds encountered during construction.
Mitigation Measures
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, the following mitigation measure has been included in a MMRP that is to be adopted concurrently with these findings.
CUL-2 Archaeological Resources Assessment
Prior to project approval of a project that involves ground disturbance activities (that may include but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing, grubbing, tree removal, and grading), the applicant shall submit to the City an archaeological resources assessment prepared by a qualified 796
Findings of Fact
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 17 archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. Assessments shall include a CHRIS records search at the NWIC and a SLF Search from the NAHC. The records searches shall characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated in and around the development site. A qualified professional shall conduct a Phase I pedestrian survey for those projects that include undeveloped areas to locate any surface cultural materials.
If the Phase I archaeological survey identifies resources that may be affected, the applicant shall also conduct Phase II testing and evaluation. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing and site avoidance is not possible, the qualified professional shall identify appropriate site-specific mitigation measures in the Phase II evaluation. These measures may include, but would not be limited to, a Phase III data recovery program, avoidance, or other appropriate actions to be determined by a qualified archaeologist. If significant archaeological resources cannot be avoided, impacts may be reduced to less than significant level by filling on top of the sites rather than cutting into the cultural deposits. Alternatively, and/or in addition, a data collection program may be warranted, including mapping the location of artifacts, surface collection of artifacts, or excavation of the cultural deposit, to characterize the nature of the buried portions of sites. Curation of the excavated artifacts or samples would occur as specified by the archaeologist.
The City shall review and approve the archaeological resources assessment prior to project approval.
CUL-3 Unanticipated Discoveries
For projects whose Phase I archaeological survey identifies archaeological resources that may be affected, the applicant shall retain a qualified cultural resource specialist to monitor construction activities that involve ground-disturbing activities greater than 12 inches in depth and occur within 60 feet of a potentially significant cultural resource. If archaeological resources are encountered during ground-disturbing activities, work in the immediate area must halt and an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology should be contacted immediately to evaluate the find. If necessary, the evaluation may require preparation of a treatment plan and archaeological testing for CRHR eligibility. If the discovery proves to be significant under CEQA and cannot be avoided by the project, additional work, such as excavating the cultural deposit to fully characterize its extent and collecting and curating artifacts may be warranted to mitigate any significant impacts to cultural resources. If archaeological resources of Native American origin are identified during construction, a qualified archaeologist will consult with the City to begin Native American consultation procedures. Periodic reports of the find and subsequent evaluations shall be submitted to the City during construction.
4.2.7 Cultural Resources – Impact CUL-3
Development facilitated by the project could result in damage to or destruction of human burials.
Impacts would be less than significant through adherence to existing regulations and with mitigation.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR (CEQA 797
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
18 Guidelines Section 15091[a][1]). Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-4 would reduce potential impacts related to human remains to a less than significant level.
Explanation
Mitigation Measure CUL-4 would reduce potential impacts on human remains to a less than significant level by requiring the implementation of the appropriate protocols in the event of discovery of human remains.
Mitigation Measures
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, the following mitigation measure has been included in an MMRP that is to be adopted concurrently with these findings.
CUL-4 Human Remains
In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, and Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 shall be followed. If during construction, there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken:
1. There shall be no further excavation or disturbance within 100 feet of the remains until the County Coroner is contacted to determine whether the remains are Native American and if an investigation of the cause of death is required. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours, and the NAHC shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the Most Likely Descendant (MLD) of the deceased Native American. The MLD may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work within 48 hours, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.
2. Where the following conditions occur, the landowner or authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity either in accordance with the recommendations of the MLD or on the project site in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance:
The NAHC is unable to identify an MLD or the MLD failed to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being notified by the commission.
The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation. The landowner or authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant, and mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner.
Additionally, California Public Resources Code Section 15064.5 requires the following relative to Native American Remains:
When an initial study identifies the existence of, or the probable likelihood of, Native American Remains within a project, a lead agency shall work with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The applicant may each develop a plan with respect to their respective individual development proposals for treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any items associated with Native American Burials with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC. 798
Findings of Fact
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 19
4.2.8 Noise – Impact NOI-2
Construction of development facilitated by the project would temporarily generate groundborne vibration and noise, potentially affecting nearby land uses. This impact would be less than significant with mitigation. Operation of development facilitated by the project would not result in substantial groundborne vibration and noise and this impact would be less than significant.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][1]). Implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-3 would reduce potential impacts related to groundborne vibration to a less than significant level.
Explanation
Implementation of Mitigation Measure requires preparation of groundborne noise and vibration analysis prior to construction and use of alternative construction equipment and construction monitoring if vibration levels would exceed Federal Transit Administration thresholds. NOI-3 Construction vibration impacts would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-3, which requires measures to reduce construction vibration.
Mitigation Measures
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, the following mitigation measure has been included in a MMRP that is to be adopted concurrently with these findings.
NOI-3 Construction Vibration Control Plan
Prior to issuance of a building permit for a project that includes the following, the project applicant shall prepare a groundborne noise and vibration analysis to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these construction activities:
Pile driving within:
135 feet of fragile structures such as historical resources; 100 feet of non-engineered timber and masonry buildings (e.g., most residential buildings); or
75 feet of engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster); A vibratory roller within:
40 feet of fragile historical resources; or
25 feet of any other structure
A dozer or other large earthmoving equipment within:
20 feet for a fragile historical structure; or
15 feet of any other structure
The noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer. The vibration levels shall not exceed FTA architectural damage thresholds (e.g., 0.12 in/sec PPV for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non-engineered timber 799
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
20 and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). If vibration levels would exceed this threshold, alternative uses such as drilling piles as opposed to pile driving, static rollers as opposed to vibratory rollers, and lower horsepower earthmoving equipment shall be used.
If necessary, construction vibration monitoring shall be conducted to ensure FTA vibration thresholds are not exceeded.
4.2.9 Paleontolgoical Resources – Impact PAL-1
The project has the potential to result in impacts to paleontological resources. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][1]). Implementation of Mitigation Measure PAL-1 would reduce potential impacts related to paleontological resources to a less than significant level.
Explanation
Mitigation Measure PAL-1 requires a Qualified Professional Paleontologist to determine a project’s potential to disturb paleontological resources for projects in an area underlain by high or undetermined geological sensitivities. The project applicant must implement the Qualified Professional Paleontologist’s recommendations. Implementation of Mitigation Measure PAL-1 would reduce adverse effects to paleontological resources and impacts would be less than significant with mitigation.
Mitigation Measures
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, the following mitigation measures have been included in a MMRP that is to be adopted concurrently with these findings.
PAL-1 Retention of Qualified Professional Paleontologist Prior to submittal of a discretionary development application in areas underlain by high or undetermined sensitivity geologic units (i.e., Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits; Markley Sandstone; Jameson Shale Member of Markley Sandstone; Domengine Sandstone; and sandstone and shale of the Great Valley Complex), the City shall require a Qualified Professional Paleontologist [as defined by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) (2010)] be retained to determine the project’s potential to significantly impact paleontological resources according to SVP (2010) standards. If necessary, the Qualified Professional Paleontologist shall recommend mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to paleontological resources to a less than significant level. The City shall review and approve the Qualified Professional Paleontologist’s findings and recommendations. All recommendations shall be incorporated into the project plans prior to issuance of a grading permit.
4.2.10 Wildfire – Impact W-2
The project could expose people and structures to wildfire risk; however, wildfire risks would be reduced with mitigation and impacts would be less than significant. 800
Findings of Fact
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 21 Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091[a][1]). Implementation of Mitigation Measures WF-1 and WF-2 would reduce potential impacts related to the risk of loss of structures and the risk of injury or death due to wildfires to a less than significant level.
Explanation
With implementation of Mitigation Measures WF-1 and WF-2 the risk of loss of structures and the risk of injury or death due to wildfires would be reduced. These measures would make structures more fire resistant and less vulnerable to loss in the event of a wildfire. These mitigation measures would also reduce the potential for construction to inadvertently ignite a wildfire and require the use of fire-resistant native vegetation. Given the risk of wildfires in the Planning Area and that mitigation would be implemented to reduce the risk, impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measure
WF-1 Wildfire Risk Reduction During Construction
For projects located in proximity to agricultural or undeveloped areas (including hillside areas) with flammable vegetation, prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit documentation that they will implement the following measures to reduce risk of loss, injury, or death from wildfire during construction:
1. Construction equipment powered by internal combustion engines shall be equipped with spark arresters. The spark arresters shall be maintained pursuant to manufacturer recommendations to ensure adequate performance.
2. Certain project construction activities with potential to ignite wildfires during red-flag warnings issued by the National Weather Service for the project site location shall be prohibited. Example activities that shall be prohibited during red-flag warnings include welding and grinding outside of enclosed buildings, mowing, chain sawing, chipping, and the use of any equipment with the potential to introduce sparks.
3. Fire extinguishers shall be required to be onsite during construction. Construction vehicles shall be equipped with at least one (1) functioning fire extinguisher and one (1) shovel or McLeod firefighting tool. Heavy machinery or equipment (e.g., tractors, grinders, tree chippers, excavators, bulldozers) shall be equipped with one (1) shovel, McLeod firefighting tool, or Pulaski; one (1) functioning fire extinguisher; and at least one 5-gallon backpack pump or larger capacity water (or CAFS) pump/delivery system. Fire extinguishers shall be maintained to function according to manufacturer specifications. Construction personnel shall receive training on the proper methods of using a fire extinguisher.
WF-2 Fire Resistant Vegetation and Landscaping
For projects located in proximity to agricultural or undeveloped areas (including hillside areas) with flammable vegetation, prior to issuance of a building permit for development located within or adjacent to a VHFHSZ, the applicant shall submit landscape plans prepared by a registered Landscape Architect that are consistent with applicable Building and Fire Codes. 801
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
22 Findings for Significant and Unavoidable Effects
Public Resources Code 21081 and 21081.5, and CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, require that the City of American Canyon balance the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental effects when determining to approve a project. If specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse effects may be considered “acceptable.” The Final EIR identifies the following significant and unavoidable impacts that would be caused by implementation of the project: impacts associated with GHG emissions (impacts related to conflicts with state GHG reduction goals), noise (impacts related to construction noise and operational traffic noise), and transportation (impacts related to VMT). The following findings and statement of overriding considerations outline the specific reasons to support the City of American Canyon Community Development Department recommendation for approval.
4.3.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Impact GHG 1
Development facilitated by the project would make progress towards achieving state goals but would not necessarily meet state 2030 or 2045 goals. Mitigation Measures GHG-1 through GHG-3 would require implementation of CEQA GHG thresholds and a Climate Action Plan (CAP); however, development facilitated by the project would not meet the 2030 or 2045 goals until the CAP is updated and adopted. This impact would be significant and unavoidable.
Mitigation Measures
GHG-1 Construction GHG BMPs
Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the project applicant shall provide the City of American Canyon with documentation (e.g., site plans) demonstrating implementation of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs). Measures may include but are not limited to:
At least 15 percent of the construction fleet for each project phase shall be alternatively fueled or electric.
At least 10 percent of building materials used for project construction shall be sourced from local suppliers.
At least 65 percent of construction and demolition waste materials shall be recycled or reused. At least one contractor that has a business location in American Canyon shall be contracted for project construction.
All construction contracts shall include language that requires all off-road equipment with a power rating below 19 kilowatts (e.g., plate compactors, pressure washers) using during construction be electrically powered.
Architectural coatings used for project construction shall be “Low-VOC,” containing no greater than 50 grams of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per liter of product. Project construction shall prohibit the use of generators and shall establish grid power connection to electrical equipment needs.
Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California Airborne Toxics Control 802
Findings of Fact
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 23 Measure [ATCM] Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations). Clear signage regarding idling restrictions shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. The prime construction contractor shall post a publicly visible sign with their telephone number and contractor to contact. The construction contractor shall take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be identified and visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.
GHG-2 Adopt and Implement a CEQA GHG Emissions Threshold The City shall include and implement a new 2040 General Plan policy under the Environment Element to prepare, adopt, and implement a CEQA GHG Emissions threshold of significance. The City shall adopt the CEQA GHG Emissions threshold of significance by the end of 2025 for use in future CEQA GHG emissions analyses through 2030. In addition, upon completion of future CAP updates and as necessary, the City shall update the CEQA GHG Emissions threshold of significance and American Canyon CEQA GHG Checklist to be consistent with each CAP update.
GHG-3 Adopt American Canyon CAP to Meet the State’s 2030 and 2045 GHG Emissions Goals
The City shall draft and adopt the American Canyon qualified CAP by the end of 2025 to outline how American Canyon will meet the State’s 2030 goal of 40 percent below 1990 emissions levels and 2045 goal of carbon neutrality. Implementation measures in the updated qualified CAP to achieve the 2030 and 2045 goals may include, but are not limited to, the following: Develop and adopt Zero Net Energy requirements for new and remodeled residential and non-residential development; Develop and adopt a building electrification ordinance for existing and proposed structures; Expand charging infrastructure and parking for electric vehicles; Implement carbon sequestration by expanding the urban forest, participating in soil-based or compost application sequestration initiatives, supporting regional open space protection, and/or incentivizing rooftop gardens; and
Implement policies and measures included in the California 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan, such as mobile source strategies for increasing clean transit options and zero emissions vehicles by providing electric vehicle charging stations.
Finding and Rationale
Implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would ensure that construction related GHG impacts would be less than significant. Implementation of Mitigation Measures GHG-2 and GHG-3 would ensure that development facilitated by the project after 2026 would be consistent with State emissions goals. However, individual projects that may occur prior to 2026 would not be guaranteed to be consistent with State emissions goals, nor are exact emissions reductions known at the time of adoption of the 2040 General Plan. Until the CEQA GHG thresholds and the CAP are prepared and adopted, implementation of the project would not be consistent with BAAQMD GHG thresholds nor would it be consistent with State GHG reduction plans. Therefore, the project’s impact related to GHG emissions would be significant and unavoidable.
803
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
24 4.3.2 Noise – Impact NOI-1
Construction of development facilitated by the project would temporarily increase noise levels, potentially affecting nearby noise-sensitive land uses. Development facilitated by the project would also introduce new noise sources and contribute to increases in operational noise. The continued regulation of noise, consistent with the City Municipal Code and implementation of proposed policies in the 2040 General Plan would minimize impacts to adjacent land uses. However, construction and operational traffic noise could exceed standards even after implementation of mitigation. This impact would be significant and unavoidable.
Mitigation Measure
NOI-1 Conduct Construction Noise Analysis
The City shall review future developments within 1,000 feet of a sensitive receiver, and where applicable, require the following feasible measures as standard conditions of approval to reduce construction noise levels below a level of significance:
Mufflers. During excavation and grading construction phases, all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be operated with closed engine doors and shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers’ standards. Stationary Equipment. All stationary construction equipment shall be placed so that emitted noise is directed away from the nearest sensitive receivers. Equipment Staging Areas. Equipment staging shall be located in areas that will create the greatest distance feasible between construction-related noise sources and noise sensitive receivers.
Smart Back-up Alarms. Mobile construction equipment shall have smart back-up alarms that automatically adjust the sound level of the alarm in response to ambient noise levels.
Alternatively, back-up alarms shall be disabled and replaced with human spotters to ensure safety when mobile construction equipment is moving in the reverse direction in compliance with applicable safety laws and regulations.
Electrically-Powered Tools and Facilities. Electrical power shall be used to run air compressors and similar power tools and to power any temporary structures, such as construction trailers or caretaker facilities, where feasible.
Noise Disturbance Coordinator. The project applicant shall designate a “noise disturbance coordinator” responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator shall determine the cause of any noise complaint and shall require that reasonable measures be implemented to correct the problem. A telephone number for the disturbance coordinator and the City shall be posted at the construction site. Temporary Noise Barriers. Erect temporary noise barriers, where feasible, when construction noise is predicted to exceed the City’s construction standards and when the anticipated construction duration is greater than is typical (e.g., two years or greater). Temporary noise barriers shall be constructed with solid materials (e.g., wood) with a density of at least 1.5 pounds per square foot with no gaps from the ground to the top of the barrier. If a sound blanket is used, barriers shall be constructed with solid material with a density of at least 1 pound per square foot with no gaps from the ground to the top of the barrier and be lined on the construction side with acoustical blanket, curtain or equivalent absorptive material rated sound transmission class (STC) 32 or higher.
804
Findings of Fact
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 25 NOI-2 Implement Roadway Vehicle Noise Reduction Measures The City shall install “quiet pavement” roadway improvements, such as rubberized asphalt or opengrade asphalt concrete overlays along impacted roadway segments (American Canyon Road west of I-80 and Newell Drive north of American Canyon Road). The program may be funded by “fair share” developer contributions for proposed projects along impacted roadways to pay for the “quiet pavement” roadway improvements.
Finding and Rationale
Construction of individual projects facilitated by the project would temporarily increase noise levels, potentially affecting nearby noise-sensitive land uses. Development facilitated by the project would also introduce new noise sources and contribute to increases in operational noise. Construction and operational traffic noise could exceed standards. The continued regulation of noise, consistent with the City Municipal Code and implementation of proposed policies in the 2040 General Plan would minimize impacts to adjacent land uses. However, construction noise impacts would be significant and unavoidable even with implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1. Operational traffic noise impact would be significant and unavoidable even with implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-2.
4.3.3 Transportation – Impact TRA-2
The future (2040) Citywide rate of Residential VMT per Capita with the proposed 2040 General Plan would be higher than the significance threshold. The project would therefore conflict with or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) and impacts would be significant.
Mitigation Measure
There are no feasible mitigation measures beyond policies included in the Mobility Element of the General Plan.
Finding and Rationale
The 2040 General Plan includes policies which would reduce VMT. However, because there is no specific mitigation to reduce VMT per resident and the General Plan policies cannot realistically enforce mitigation programs or policies that might reduce VMT below the threshold, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.
805
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
26 5 Project Alternatives
Section 15126.6 of the CEQA Guidelines states the following:
An EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project.
Rather it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decision making and public participation. An EIR is not required to consider alternatives which are infeasible. The lead agency is responsible for selecting a range of project alternatives for examination and must publicly disclose its reasoning for selecting those alternatives. There is no ironclad rule governing the nature or scope of the alternatives to be discussed other than the rule of reason.
As described in Section 4.3, Findings for Significant and Unavoidable Effects, above, the City of American Canyon has determined that, even after the adoption of all feasible mitigation measures, the project would still cause one or more significant environmental impacts that cannot be avoided or lessened to below a level of significance. Therefore, the City of American Canyon must determine if there is a project alternative that is both environmentally superior and feasible. An alternative may be “infeasible” if it fails to achieve the most basic project objectives identified within the EIR.
Further, “feasibility” under CEQA encompasses the desirability of the project “based on a reasonable balancing of the relevant economic, environmental, social, and technological factors” of a project (City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego [1982], 133 Cal.App.3d at p. 417; see also Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland [1993], 23 Cal.App.4th at p. 715).
The Final EIR identifies the following significant and unavoidable impacts that would be caused by implementation of the project: impacts associated with GHG emissions (impacts related to conflicts with state GHG reduction goals), noise (impacts related to construction noise and operational traffic noise), and transportation (impacts related to VMT). The alternatives analyzed in the Final EIR and described below are therefore discussed below in terms of their potential ability to avoid or reduce these impacts.
Alternative 1: No Project Alternative
The No Project Alternative represents the continuation of existing zoning and General Plan designations within the City. Assuming a maximum buildout scenario, buildout for the No Project Alternative would allow for 3,204 housing units and approximately 5.7 million square feet of additional non-residential land uses. Compared to the proposed project, the No Project Alternative would not include updated General Plan policies.
Finding
The No Project Alternative would have a significant and unavoidable effect on GHG emissions and would not implement Mitigation Measures GHG-2 or GHG-3 which would require the adoption of a GHG threshold and CAP to meet the State’s 2030 and 2045 GHG emissions goals. The No Project Alternative would not implement policies in the 2040 General Plan Update, including policies related to noise compatibility in site design (policies S-8.1, S-8.2, and S-8.3), which would result in 806
Project Alternatives
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 27 greater stationary source noise impacts than the proposed project. The No Project Alternative would result in an increase in VMT compared to the proposed project because the No Project Alternative would not implement 2040 General Plan Update policies MOB-1.17 or MOB-6.1 that support VMT reduction. Therefore, the No Project Alternative would result in worse significant and unavoidable traffic noise impacts and VMT impacts compared to the proposed project. In addition, the No Project Alternative would not reduce the impact of any other issue area analyzed within the Final EIR.
The No Project Alternative would not accomplish the primary objective of the project, which is to update the existing American Canyon General Plan for it to be compliant with State law. In addition, the No Project Alternative would not include the updated 2040 General Plan policies and programs pertaining to community development, preservation of natural resources, sustainability, and improvement of American Canyon’s circulation network.
The No Project Alternative would not reduce the proposed project’s environmental impacts, would not fulfill any project objectives, and would be inconsistent with State law. Therefore, the City rejects the No Project Alternative as infeasible because it would not achieve the project objectives.
The findings for the proposed project set forth in this document and the overriding social, economic and other considerations set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations provide support for selection of the proposed project and the elimination of this alternative from further consideration.
Alternative 2: Watson Ranch Natural Alternative
Alternative 2 would assume maximum density on the Watson Ranch property which would result in an additional 596 dwelling units. Alternative 2 assumes that the General Plan would be updated like for the proposed project, (including the updated policies that make the General Plan consistent with State law). Overall Alternative 2 assumes increased residential densities when compared to the proposed project (3,975 total units). In addition, because Alternative 2 would maintain the same designations as the General Plans for non-residential spaces, the buildout of non-residential space would be the same as the proposed project. Buildout under Alternative 2, assuming a maximum buildout scenario, would allow for 3,975 housing units and approximately 5,704,000 square feet of additional non-residential land uses.
Finding
Alternative 2 would meet the objectives of the proposed project as it would increase residential buildout while accommodating the same amount of non-residential buildout as the proposed project. However, due to the increased residential buildout, Alternative 2 would increase GHG emissions, construction noise and traffic noise, and VMT per capita in comparison to the proposed project and these impacts would remain significant and unavoidable, similar to the proposed project. In addition, Alternative 2 would result in similar, though slightly increased, impacts to aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, paleontological resources, population and housing, public services and recreation, tribal cultural resources, and utilities and service systems due to the increased residential buildout.
Although Alternative 2 would fulfill the project objectives, due to the increased environmental impacts associated with Alternative 2 in comparison to the proposed project, Alternative 2 is less 807
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
28 desirable than the proposed project. Therefore, the City rejects Alternative 2 as undesirable as it fails to reduce any of the proposed project’s environmental effects.
The findings for the proposed project set forth in this document and the overriding social, economic and other considerations set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations provide support for selection of the proposed project and the elimination of this alternative from further consideration.
Alternative 3: Limited Growth Alternative
Alternative 3 assumes that the General Plan would be updated to include the updated policies that make the General Plan consistent with State law. However, under Alternative 3, buildout would be limited to pipeline projects (i.e., project already identified by the City to be constructed in the future) and other projects that have already been approved or for which General Plan amendments have already been approved (e.g., Watson Ranch Specific Plan, Broadway District Specific Plan). As such, buildout would be reduced in the following ways:
Residential buildout would be reduced by 408 dwelling units compared to the proposed project because: (1) the land use designations for the two NVUSD would remain as Recreation and Public and would not be changed to Residential Medium, reducing the number of residential units by 175 units and (2) the buildout identified in the City’s Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Nexus Study would be reduced by 233 residential units.
Non-residential land use area would be reduced by 65,000 square feet based on the buildout identified in the City’s TIF Nexus Study.
Overall Alternative 3 assumes decreased residential densities (2,971 units total) when compared to the proposed project (3,379 total units), as well as decreased non-residential area (5,639,000 square feet) when compared to the proposed project (5,704,000 square feet).
Finding
Alternative 3 would require the City to limit growth to those projects that have already been approved by the City or identified as planned projects. Alternative 3 would not reduce the proposed project’s significant and unavoidable impact related to GHG emissions, construction noise, and traffic noise. However, Alternative 3’s reduced buildout would result in reduced construction impacts related to air quality construction emissions, biological resources, cultural resources, temporary noise, tribal cultural resources, and paleontological resources due to less area being affected (i.e., excavated, graded, etc.) and due to less use of construction equipment. In addition, Alternative 3 would result in reduced aesthetic impacts because there would be fewer buildings; less air quality emissions because there would be less overall VMT; less operational noise because there would be less traffic and fewer HVAC units; and less demand for public services, recreation, and utilities.
Alternative 3 would require the City to limit growth to those projects that have already been approved by the City or identified as planned projects. Alternative 3 would reduce the residential and non-residential buildout; therefore, compared to the proposed project, this alternative would reduce the ability for the City to meet its vision of accommodating a residential population with a range of uses; creating a center of employment and commerce; and capturing visitors to the Napa Valley. While Alternative 3 would meet the objective of updating the General Plan so that it’s consistent with State law, this alternative would not help meet the vision of American Canyon to the 808
Project Alternatives
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 29 same extent as the proposed project. Therefore, the City rejects Alternative 3 as undesirable because it would not achieve project objectives to the same extent as the proposed project.
The findings for the proposed project set forth in this document and the overriding social, economic and other considerations set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations provide support for selection of the proposed project and the elimination of this alternative from further consideration.
809
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
30 6 Statement of Overriding Considerations
As described in the Final EIR for the American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update, the EIR finds that all potential impacts from adoption of the project and from physical changes that could potentially occur due to adoption of the project can be feasibly mitigated to a level that is less than significant, with the following exceptions: Impact GHG-1, conflicts with applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions; Impact NOI-1, construction noise and operational traffic noise impacts from new development; and Impact TRA-2, conflicts with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b).
In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the City Council has, in determining whether to approve the project, balanced the economic, legal, social, technological, and other benefits of the project against the potentially unavoidable environmental impacts, and has found that the benefits of the project outweigh the potentially unavoidable environmental effects, for the reasons set forth below. The following statements specify the reasons why, in the City Council’s judgement, the benefits of the project outweigh any of the significant and unavoidable consequences described in the EIR. The City Council also finds that any one of the following reasons cited below is sufficient to justify approval of the project. Thus, even if it were to be determined that not every reason cited below is supported by substantial evidence, the City Council determines that each individual reason is sufficient justification of approval of the project. The substantial evidence supporting the City Council’s findings and the benefits described below can be found in the record of proceedings. The adoption of the project would update outdated policies in a manner that meets current State legal requirements for General Plans.
The adoption of the project would set forth a plan for ensuring the residents of American Canyon are accommodated with a sufficient range of uses to support the needs of residents (including a mix of housing types, commercial services, entertainment, employment, recreation, education, health, religious, cultural facilities, transportation services, and open space). The adoption of the project would set forth a plan for the City to be a center of employment and commerce for regional, as well as local residents.
The adoption of the project would set forth a plan to capture visitors to the Napa Valley by providing uses which capitalize on the unique environmental setting of the foothills, river valleys, and agriculture.
The adoption of the project would implement policies designed to support the enhancement of utility infrastructure to sustain households, businesses, and future population increases and employment growth in American Canyon.
The adoption of the project would implement policies designed to maintain a safe and efficient transportation system that includes roadway, transit, bicycle, pedestrian, rail transport, and aviation.
The adoption of the project would implement strategies for preserving and enhancing human and natural environments, including sensitive habitats, waterways, cultural resources, open space, parks, and scenic areas.
The adoption of the project would implement policies designed to achieve GHG emissions reduction targets set forth in Executive Order B-55-18. 810
Statement of Overriding Considerations
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations 31 The adoption of the project would implement strategies for providing a safe community through public safety services, resilient infrastructure, public awareness, preparedness, and action plans for both human-caused and natural disasters.
The adoption of the project would establish a basis for judging whether specific development proposals and public projects are in harmony with the General Plan policies and standards.
Any one of these reasons is sufficient to support adoption of the American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update, and to outweigh the identified significant and unavoidable environmental effects that might occur due to adoption of the project. In light of the benefits to the City and the local community identified above, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15903, the City Council finds that these overriding considerations, as identified in conjunction with the environmental review of impacts stemming from adoption of the American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update, outweigh the potentially significant and unavoidable environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR, rendering those impacts acceptable under the circumstances.
811
City of American Canyon
American Canyon 2040 General Plan Update
32 7 Statement of Location and Custodian of
Documents
Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(e) require that the City of American Canyon, as the Lead Agency, specify the location and custodian of the documents of other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision has been based. The following location is where review of the record may be performed:
City of American Canyon
Community Development Department
4381 Broadway Street, Suite 201
American Canyon, California 94503
The City of American Canyon has relied on all of the documents contained within the record of proceedings in reaching its decision on the project.
812
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COMPREHENSIVE TECHNICAL GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND POLICIES TO SUSTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2024 NAPA COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE
COMPATIBILITY PLAN
WHEREAS, in 2019, the City of American Canyon ("City") began the process of comprehensively updating the General Plan, and since this time City officials, employees, and community members have been actively involved in the preparation of the 2040 General Plan Update ("2040 General Plan"); and WHEREAS, the 2040 General Plan applies to lands within City limits and also certain lands outside City limits, which collectively comprise the City's Planning Area. The City's Planning Area covers includes the City of American Canyon Water and Sewer Service area, the City limits, the City’s Sphere of Influence (SOI), and urban limit line; and
WHEREAS, the 2040 General Plan is a comprehensive, long-term plan for the City's future growth and development, represents the community’s view of its future, and contains the goals and policies upon with the City Council, Planning Commission, and the entire community will base land use and resource decisions; and
WHEREAS, the 2040 General Plan Update is the first comprehensive update since the City's General Plan was originally adopted in 1994; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Sections 65351 through 65352.5, the City provided opportunities for public input and involvement on the 2040 General Plan, and provided opportunities for consultation to affected public agencies and California Native American tribes on the 2040 General Plan; and
WHEREAS, in conformance with Government Code Section 65302 describing the mandatory and optional elements of a General Plan, the 2040 General Plan contains the following chapters, which address the mandatory elements: Land Use Element; Mobility (Circulation) Element; Utilities Element; Housing Element; Environment, Parks & Recreation Element (Natural and Historic & Cultural Resources Element, Geology Element); Safety Element (Public Services and Facilities Element, Flood Hazards Element, and Noise Element); and Environmental Justice Element; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Element was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in June 2023 and remains in full force and effect without modification by this General Plan Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan incorporates the American Canyon Bicycle Master Plan (Resolution 2020-11), Pedestrian Master Plan (Resolution 2017-42); and the 2024 Napa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan as a standalone document incorporated into the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) (SCH No. 2022070038) for the 2040 General Plan; and
813
WHEREAS, prior to recommending adoption of the 2040 General Plan, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the analysis contained in the Final EIR. By separate resolution, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council (1) certify the Final EIR, (2) adopt CEQA Findings for Significant Environmental Impacts and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and (3) adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 2040 General Plan; and WHEREAS, on March 27, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing to evaluate the Comprehensive Technical General Plan Update and determined that based on all the evidence presented, including, but not limited to, written and oral testimony given at meetings, it is appropriate to recommend that the City Council approve the Comprehensive Technical General Plan Update including policies to ensure compliance with the 2024 Napa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025, the City Council conducted a workshop to evaluate the Comprehensive Technical General Plan Update and Final EIR; and
WHEREAS, on May 7, 2025, the Napa County Airport Land Use Commission determined that the proposed General Plan Update is consistent with the Napa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan; and WHEREAS, on May 20, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly-noticed public hearing to evaluate the Comprehensive Technical General Plan Update and Final EIR and determined that based on all the evidence presented, including, but not limited to, written and oral testimony given at meetings, it is appropriate to certify the Final EIR as adequate to address environmental impacts associated with the Comprehensive Technical General Plan Update, and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are included herein by reference as findings.
SECTION 1: Comprehensive Technical General Plan Update. The City Council approves the Comprehensive Technical General Plan Update (Exhibit A to this Resolution).
SECTION 2: Napa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The City Council approves the 2024 Napa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan as a standalone document incorporated into the General Plan. (Exhibit B to this Resolution).
SECTION 3: CEQA Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act. The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that evaluates the General Plan Update Project at a program level of analysis (SCH #2022070038) and includes required mitigation measures and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). The General Plan Update is a contemplated “Project Approval” under the Program EIR.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon held on the 20th day of May 2025, by the following vote:
814
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
____________________________
Pierre Washington, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________ _________________________________ Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk William D. Ross, City Attorney Exhibits
Exhibit A: REDLINE Draft General Plan
Exhibit B: 2024 Napa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan 815
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Public Review Draft General Plan | September 2024| i
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT
MAY 2025
ATTACHMENT 2, EXHIBIT A
816
ii | Public Review Draft General Plan | May 2025
This page is intentionally left blank.
817
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Public Review Draft General Plan | September 2024| iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
City Council
Pierre Washington, Mayor
David Oro, Vice Mayor
Brando Cruz, Councilmember
Mark Joseph, Councilmember
Melissa Lamattina, Councilmember
Planning Commission
Davet Mohammad, Chair
Charlie Plummer, Vice Chair
Marilyn Abelon, Commissioner
Eric Altman, Commissioner
Shelby Goss, Commissioner
Ramandeep Jawanda, Youth Commissioner
Open Space, Active Transportation, and
Sustainability Commission
Parks and Community Services Commission
Nance Matson, Chair Gina Griggs, Chair
Tara Clinton-Horner, Vice Chair Elston Mallory, Jr., Vice Chair Debbie Chavarria, Commissioner Shirley Koot, Commissioner Barry Christian, Commissioner Scott Myer, Commissioner
Sean Hughes, Commissioner Iain Smith, Commissioner
Calix Joel Delos Santos Mintalar, Youth Commissioner Heather Mora, Youth Commissioner Circulation Element Committee Education and Lifelong Learning Committee William Baker Andrea Maniscalco Sindy Biederman (NCOE Representative) Joan Bennett Beth Marcus Megan Dameron
Stephen Brook Hugh Marquez Patricia Gamboa
Noemi Camargo Jepsen Helen Moody Elizabeth L. Goff
Glen Couch Arvind Nischal Rob Hall
Julie Foster Yvonne Pond Ray A. Hill
Brian Goldhammer Jamie Potter Joy Hilton (ACCPF Representative) Gina Griggs Devin Reza Melissa Lamattina
Christina Hall Kathryn Ross Cynthia Lederer
Christopher James Marion Sullivan Kasama Lee
Joy Malinowski Honeylou Tiongson Terrance McGrath (WRSP Representative) Rina Mitchell
Jeremy Profitt
Charlie Plummer
Jeremiah E. Quinn
Sande Sutter
Vickie Zupo
818
iv | Public Review Draft General Plan | May 2025
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Staff Consultant Team
Jason Holley, City Manager Jim Harnish, Principal, Mintier Harnish Juan Gomez, Assistant City Manager Gianna Meschi, Rincon Consultants Bill Ross, City Attorney Brent Gibbons, Mintier Harnish Geoff Belyea, Chief, American Canyon Fire Protection District Della Acosta, Rincon Consultants Rick Greenberg, Chief, American Canyon Police Department Hannah Bireschi, Rincon Consultants Brent Cooper, AICP, Community Development Director Jennifer Guenther, Rincon Consultants Alexandra Ikeda, Parks and Community Services Director Matt Mattox, Rincon Consultants Erica Ahmann Smithies, Public Works Director Leo Mena, Rincon Consultants Taresa Geilfuss, CMC, City Clerk
Edison Bisnar, Senior Civil Engineer
Nicolle Hall, Deputy City Clerk
William He, AICP, Senior Planner
Jennifer Kansanback, Communications Manager
Adoption and Amendment History
Action Adoption Date Document
819
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Public Review Draft General Plan | May 2025| TOC-1
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ............................................................................................... INT-1
2. Land Use Element .........................................................................................LU-1 Land Use Diagram and Designations.................................................................... LU-3
3. Housing Element................................................. Published under separate cover
4. Mobility Element.......................................................................................... M-1 Mobility Vision....................................................................................................... M-3 Introduction........................................................................................................... M-4 Transportation Setting .......................................................................................... M-7 Street System Plan............................................................................................... M-16 Public Transportation.......................................................................................... M-35 Goods Movement................................................................................................ M-38
5. Utilities Element............................................................................................U-1 Water Infrastructure and Supply............................................................................U-3 Wastewater............................................................................................................U-9 Flood Control and Storm Drainage.......................................................................U-12 Solid Waste Disposal and Recycling .....................................................................U-16 Energy Utilities .....................................................................................................U-19
6. Environment, Parks & Recreation Element.................................................. ENV-1 Biological Resources...........................................................................................ENV-4 Water Resources................................................................................................ENV-8 Cultural and Historic Resources .........................................................................ENV-9 Open Space.......................................................................................................ENV-11 Trail Networks..................................................................................................ENV-13 Parks and Recreation........................................................................................ENV-18 Quimby Act.......................................................................................................ENV-19 Public Art..........................................................................................................ENV-25 Scenic Resources..............................................................................................ENV-26 Climate Change and Air Quality .......................................................................ENV-28 820
TOC-2 | Public Review Draft General Plan | May 2025
7. Safety Element ...............................................................................................S-1 Emergency Response and Preparedness ................................................................S-3 Wildfire Hazards....................................................................................................S-14 Flood Hazards........................................................................................................S-18 Geologic and Seismic Hazards...............................................................................S-21 Hazardous Materials..............................................................................................S-27 Airport Hazards and Military Compatibility ..........................................................S-29 Climate Change and Adaptation............................................................................S-32 Noise......................................................................................................................S-35
8. Environmental Justice Element...................................................................... EJ-1 Background............................................................................................................ EJ-6 Environmental Justice in American Canyon ........................................................ EJ-10 Attachments:
4-1 Bicycle Master Plan (Resolution 2020-11)
4-2 Pedestrian Master Plan (Resolution 2017-42)
8-1 Napa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
Justification: Attachments 4-1 and 4-2 were previously adopted into the General Plan and remain in the Updated General Plan. The Napa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan is new and needs to be included in the General Plan.
821
Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025 | INT-1
Introduction
The General Plan expresses the shared community vision of a Healthy, Equitable, Resilient, and Economically Vibrant community to the Year 2040 and beyond. A General Plan benefits American Canyon by promoting better projects, streamlined processes, integrated planning, and improved access and use of available resources. 1 822
INT-2 | Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025
This page is intentionally left blank.
823
1. INTRODUCTION
Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025 | INT-3
Introduction
Purpose and Use of the General Plan
What is a General Plan?
Every city and county in California must have a General Plan, which is the local government’s long-term framework or “constitution” for future growth and development. The General Plan represents the product of extensive community engagement that expresses the community’s vision for its future.
This General Plan is designed to address the issues facing the jurisdiction for the next 20 years. The General Plan typically has four defining features:
• General. A General Plan provides general policy guidance that will be used to direct future land use and resource decisions.
• Comprehensive. A General Plan is comprehensive, covering topics such as land use; housing; economic development; environmental justice; sustainability and resiliency; mobility; public safety; recreation; natural resources; and much more.
• Long-Range. A General Plan provides guidance on reaching a future envisioned 20 or more years in the future. To achieve the vision, a General Plan includes goals, policies, and implementation programs that address both immediate and long-term needs.
• Integrated and Coherent. The goals, policies, and implementation programs in a General Plan present a comprehensive, unified program for development, resource conservation, and other issues that impact the community. A General Plan uses assumptions and projections to assess future demands for housing, employment, and public facilities (e.g., infrastructure). A General Plan has goals, policies, and implementation programs that enable citizens to understand the vision of the General Plan, and landowners, businesses, and industry to be more certain about how the Plan will be implemented.
A General Plan is made up of “elements” that cover mandatory and optional topics important to the community. Eight elements are required to be included in the General Plan by the State. These are: Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Conservation, Open Space, Noise, Safety, and Environmental Justice.
Though the required topics must be addressed in the General Plan, communities can organize their General Plan anyway they choose. 824
INT-4 | Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025
Communities may also include other optional elements that address issues of local interest, such as Economic Development, Health, or Education.
Zoning is an important implementation tool of the General Plan. Although the General Plan and zoning code designate how land may be developed, they do so in different ways. The General Plan identifies allowable land uses, spatial land use relationships, and general pattern of future development.
Land uses shown on the General Plan diagram will be reflected in the local zoning maps, as required per State law. Zoning refines and implements the General Plan land uses by providing specific development standards such as lot size, building setbacks, and allowable uses. Development must not only meet the specific requirements of the zoning code, but also the broader policies set forth in the General Plan.
The American Canyon General Plan meets the requirements of State law by including required elements and one optional element as described in more detail later in this chapter under “Organization of the General Plan.” Some of the required elements address additional issues of local interest. Each element contains goals and policies that will guide future decisions within the City. They each also identify implementation programs that will be used to ensure the goals and policies in the General Plan are carried out.
The American Canyon Community
American Canyon is located in Southern Napa County close to the worldfamous Napa Valley wine growing region and in close proximity to the San Francisco Bay. Beginning with the McKnight Acres subdivision in the 1940s and the Rancho Del Mar subdivision in the 1950s, American Canyon began a period of initial growth. With McKnight Acres’ 150 residential sites and Rancho Del Mar’s 600 homes, schools, businesses, and the area’s first fire and sewer districts quickly emerged. By 1963 the area supported 27 businesses and was the largest industrial zone in the county. Despite this growth, the area would remain an unincorporated area of Napa County through the 1980s.
In 1991, American Canyon residents overwhelmingly voted to incorporate the City. At the heart of incorporation is the resident’s ability to gain local control over land use and other important decisions that affect their everyday life.
The City operates under a council-manager form of government and is a general law city. The City provides a full range of municipal services including police and fire protection services; construction and maintenance of City 825
1. INTRODUCTION
Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025 | INT-5
streets, storm drains, bridges and similar infrastructure type assets; park maintenance and community recreation activities; short and long-range community planning; operation of water, wastewater, and recycled water utilities; and more.
Since becoming a City on January 1, 1992, the City has grown to more than 21,000 residents., American Canyon is home to three elementary schools, one middle school and one high school and dozens of businesses. In addition to the tourism related economic benefits of proximity to the Napa Valley, American Canyon benefits tremendously as a wine processing hub. Because of our strategic location at the southern end of Napa County and with easy access to state and interstate highways, American Canyon's industrial district is home to millions of square feet of wine processing, bottling, storage, and shipping space. Demand for space in this area is very high, with very little vacancy and there is new development underway.
Regional Setting
Located 35 miles northeast of San Francisco, the City of American Canyon covers an area approximately 6.5 square miles as shown in Figure INT-1. The City is bounded geographically by the Napa River to the west, the Eastern Foothills of the Sulphur Springs Mountain Range to the east, the City of Vallejo to the south, and the Napa Airport to the north.
American Canyon Boundaries
The General Plan uses several terms to describe the City and planning boundaries, as shown on Figure 2.
• City Limits. The boundary within the incorporated city limits.
American Canyon has land use authority over all land within its city limits.
• Sphere of Influence. The Napa Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) establishes the Sphere of Influence (SOI), which defines the probable physical boundary and service area of a local agency. The SOI includes incorporated and unincorporated areas where the City has or plans to have responsibility to provide public facilities and services.
The City’s SOI was approved by the Napa Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) at the time of incorporation in 1992 and updated in 2003.
826
INT-6 | Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025
• City Urban Limit Line. The City Council adopted a 2008 voter-initiated Urban Limit Line (ULL) around the city. This ULL was negotiated with Napa County to be consistent with the county’s general plan and agricultural protection ordinances. The boundary helps preserve agriculture and open spaces, prevent urban sprawl, and implements the planned development of the city. The ULL also fosters sustainable growth and maintains a balance between housing and jobs. According to the initiative, the ULL will expire in 2030. The General Plan extends the existing ULL indefinitely and includes a special study area that will consider an addition of the Hess/Laird Property northeast of the city’s current ULL. JUSTIFICATION: The Hess/Laird Property addition to the ULL requires the City to meet and confer with Napa County. • General Plan Planning Area. A General Plan, pursuant to State law, must address all areas within the jurisdiction’s Planning Area that bears a physical relationship to the long-term planning of the city. The General Plan Planning Area encompasses the City of American Canyon Water and Sewer Service area. This area includes the City, SOI, ULL, and Extraterritorial Water and Sewer Service area. Unincorporated Napa County has land use authority within the Extraterritorial Water and Sewer Service area, however, as the Water and Sewer Service provider, the City’s Extraterritorial Water and Sewer Service area bears relation to the City’s planning consistent with Gov. Code §65300. 827
1. INTRODUCTION
Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025 | INT-7
INT-Figure 1: Regional Context
828
INT-8 | Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025
INT-Figure 2: General Plan Planning Boundaries
829
1. INTRODUCTION
Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025 | INT-9
Using the General Plan
The General Plan is an important reference document used by the City Council, Planning Commission, and City staff to make recommendations and decisions with direct or indirect land use implications. It also provides a framework for inter-jurisdictional planning coordination among officials and staff of the City and other Federal, State, and local agencies. City residents, property owners, and businesses use the General Plan for guidance on City policies for geographic areas or to be informed of policies on particular subjects of interest.
As the constitution of development, the General Plan provides the basis for a broad range of development-related regulatory measures and administrative procedures. California planning law requires consistency between the General Plan and implementing programs, such as zoning and subdivision ordinances, capital improvement programs, specific plans, environmental impact procedures, and building and housing codes. The specific roles of the City Council, Planning Commission, and City departments with respect to the approval and use of the General Plan are described below.
City Council
The City Council is the political body which formulates and implements policies in American Canyon. It is the City Council, through its decision-making authority, that affirms the policy direction and priorities contained within this General Plan. The City Council is responsible for adoption of the General Plan, as well as the regulations, capital improvement programs, and financing mechanisms that implement the General Plan.
Planning Commission
The Planning Commission is a 5-member body responsible for offering insights into the General Plan policies, conducting public hearings on the General Plan and Zoning Code modifications, considering public input on development applications and policy changes, and making recommendations to the City Council on these matters. After the General Plan is adopted, the Planning Commission through findings included in the administrative record, verifies that all subsequent land use ordinances, policies, guidelines, and development applications are consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies in the General Plan.
830
INT-10 | Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025
Parks and Community Services Commission
The Parks and Community Services Commission is a 5-member body responsible for advising the City Council on matters pertaining to park development, park and recreation facility use issues, recreation programming and related issues.
Open Space, Active Transportation, and Sustainability Commission The Open Space, Active Transportation, and Sustainability Commission is a 5- member body responsible for advising the City Council on open space, active transportation, and sustainability efforts in and around American Canyon.
City Departments
The General Plan is a resource for all City services and provides an internally consistent checkpoint for assessing alternatives for the City’s future. For this reason, all City departments use the General Plan for policy guidance as it pertains to their operations, service delivery, and planning for future capital projects and potential service level changes. The City’s planning staff ensure that the General Plan is implemented on a day-to-day basis so that appropriate land uses are proposed in the proper locations, appropriate levels of service are provided, proposed land uses conform to development regulations, and the environment has been adequately protected.
Preparing the General Plan
In early 2020, the City kicked off the General Plan Update process. This Update ensures the City grows according to current community needs and priorities.
New issues, such as community health and climate change, housing, shared mobility, and online shopping, is also included in the updated General Plan.
The update process involved multiple opportunities for the public to engage in the development of the Plan (see Community Engagement section below).
Community Engagement
The General Plan was shaped through robust public engagement program that provided an opportunity for all community members to be involved in the General Plan update process. The City gathered community input through the following methods:
1. In-person and virtual community workshops;
831
1. INTRODUCTION
Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025 | INT-11
2. General Plan Update website –
www.cityofamericancanyon.org/government/communitydevelopment/planning-zoning/general-plan-update;
3. eBlasts;
4. Circulation Element Advisory Committee meetings;
5. Education and Lifelong Learning Element Advisory Committee meetings;
6. Parks and Recreation Element Working Group meetings; and
7. Planning Commission and City Council meetings, study sessions, and public hearings.
Community Workshops
The update process involved multiple opportunities for the public to engage in the development of the 2040 General Plan. The City gathered community input through the following methods:
• On February 18, 2020, the City held their annual State of the City at the Boys and Girls Club Clubhouse. The event led with a presentation and was followed by an open house to discuss the General Plan Update. The purpose of the open house was to provide an overview of the General Plan Update, relay opportunities to get involved in the process, collect input on issues and opportunities that should be addressed through the Plan, and receive initial feedback on a citywide vision for American Canyon.
• On April 13 and 27, 2022, the City hosted (via Zoom) two, separate, yet identical workshops. The purpose of this workshop was to introduce the Housing Element and new State requirements, as well as an opportunity for the public to provide comments on housing concerns in the community.
General Plan Update Website
To help expand the outreach efforts of the General Plan, this project included a project website (www.cityofamericancanyon.org/government/communitydevelopment/planning-zoning/general-plan-update) to provide information on the process including information on the General Plan, meeting dates and locations, and related documents. The City used regular updates to the project website throughout the update process to keep community members informed and involved.
832
INT-12 | Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025
eBlasts
Throughout the update process, the City sent timely eBlasts to the General Plan contact list, which included elected and appointed officials, City Staff, stakeholders, and engaged community members. People could join the contact list through a link on the project website, by signing-in at a General Plan community workshop or public meeting, or by directly contacting the City of American Canyon.
Circulation Element Advisory Committee Meetings
The Circulation Element Advisory Committee recommended a road alignment for the “West Side Connector,” along with programs and policies for multimodal transportation solutions throughout the City.
Education and Lifelong Learning Element Advisory Committee Meetings
The Education and Lifelong Learning Element Advisory Committee provided recommendations for educational needs for all residents, including children younger than public school age and adults of post-secondary education age and seniors.
Parks and Recreation Element Working Group meetings
The Parks and Recreation Element Working Group will provide recommendations to meet the parks and recreation needs of all residents and it is anticipated that this effort will effectively result in a new Parks and Community Services Master Plan.
Planning Commission and City Council Meetings, Study Sessions, and Public Hearings
The City held various Planning Commission and City Council meetings, study sessions, and public hearings throughout the update process to inform decision-makers and the public, discuss key milestones, and provide direction for the next steps.
Analyses Informing the General Plan
Existing Conditions StoryMap. The Existing Conditions StoryMap tells the story of American Canyon – where it has been, where it is today, and the trends that will shape its future and focuses on providing the foundational 833
1. INTRODUCTION
Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025 | INT-13
information about the physical, natural, cultural, and economic conditions and trends that set the stage for updating the General Plan.
Organization of the General Plan
Table INT-1 shows how the elements of the American Canyon General Plan are organized to meet the requirements of State law.
INT-Table 1: Elements of the American Canyon General Plan American Canyon Elements
State Mandated
Optional Elements
Land Use
Circulation
Housing
Conservation
Noise
Open Space
Safety
Environmental
Justice
Land Use ◼ ◼
Housing ◼ ◼ ◼
Economic Development ◼
Mobility ◼
Utilities ◼ ◼
Public Services and Facilities ◼ ◼ ◼
Parks and Recreation ◼
Environment ◼ ◼
Safety ◼ ◼ ◼
Environmental Justice ◼ ◼
The General Plan is organized into 12 chapters (an introductory chapter, 10 elements, and a glossary), allowing users to find topics or sections that interest them. The policies throughout all elements work together and users must 834
INT-14 | Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025
consider them comprehensively when making planning decisions. The chapters of the General Plan are as follows.
1. Introduction
The Introduction chapter provides an overview of the General Plan, its use and maintenance, the process used to develop the 2040 General Plan, and the Vision and Guiding Principles. This chapter also includes a Reader’s Guide that provides useful information on how to read and use the goals, policies, and implementation programs presented in each element.
2. Land Use Element
The Land Use Element establishes the pattern and intensity of land use in the city and sets forth policies and standards to guide future development.
3. Housing Element
The Housing Element ensures that there is adequate land in place to accommodate American Canyon’s fair share of new residents. Housing Elements are updated on separate cycles per State law. The current Housing Element will cover the time span from 2023-2031 and will address housing needs in the city in compliance with State housing law.
4. Economic Development Element Reserved
The Economic Development Element focuses on supporting traditional employment sectors, including retail and office commercial, industrial, and commercial recreation, while ensuring the city is responsive to cost pressures, and shifting consumer demands.
Justification: The Economic Development Element was not part of the updated General Plan scope.
5. Mobility Element
The Mobility Element focuses on providing a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel.
6. Utilities Element
835
1. INTRODUCTION
Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025 | INT-15
The Utilities Element guides decision-making concerning public and private infrastructure and utilities.
7. Public Services and Facilities Element
The Public Services and Facilities Element provides policies focused on improving the City’s services and facilities focused on education, recreation, libraries and emergency and medical services.
8. Parks and Recreation Element
The Parks and Recreation Element focuses on conserving the city’s park and open space environments for present and future residents, as well as enhancing important attributes to American Canyon that provide recreation for residents and visitors.
9. Environment Element
The Environment Element aims to preserve, protect, and enhance the natural and historical resources that make American Canyon a unique place.
10. Safety Element
The Safety Element establishes a policy framework for protecting people and property from unreasonable risks from natural disasters, noise, and other events. It also focuses on disaster and emergency response.
11. Environmental Justice Element
The Environmental Justice Element establishes a policy framework for encouraging and supporting local efforts to increase participation in the local political process and to improve local conditions relative to environmental justice issues. The themes covered in this element lay the foundation for creating a more equitable and inclusive City for all residents of American Canyon.
12. Glossary
This chapter provides a definition of the key terms used in the General Plan.
836
INT-16 | Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025
Readers’ Guide
Goals and Policies
Each element contains the goals and policies that the City will use to guide future land use, development, resource management, and environmental protection decisions. Figure I-3 explains the standard format for goals and policies, using a sample goal and policy.
INT-Figure 3: How to Read Goals and Policies
837
1. INTRODUCTION
Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025 | INT-17
Goal
A goal is a statement that describes in general terms a desired future condition or “end” state. Goals describe ideal future conditions for a topic and tend to be very general and broad.
Policy
A policy is a clear and unambiguous statement that guides a specific course of action for decision-makers to achieve a desired goal.
“Shall” vs. “Should”
Policies and implementation measures throughout the General Plan use terms such as “shall” and “should” to define the intentions of the City relative to these components. These modifiers are used as follows in the General Plan:
“Must” or “shall” or “required” are used to signify a mandatory requirement that the City will follow. For example, Policy U-4.4 says: “Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program. To this end, the City shall ensure that local regulations are in full compliance with standards adopted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).”
Words such as “should” or “may” are used to signify a less rigid directive, that will be honored in the absence of compelling or contravening considerations.
For example, Policy U-2.5 says: “Subject to State regulations and organizational capacity, consider new ways that recycled water can replace potable water. ” This provides flexibility in addressing the policy in the context of the project or proposal.
Implementation Programs
Many policies will be implemented as part of routine City operations, and some policies require specific actions. The final section of each Element includes a table of implementation programs in a format illustrated on Figure I-4. Each implementation program will be evaluated in light of City resources, such as financial, staffing, and technology over the 20-year planning period. 838
INT-18 | Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025
INT-Figure 4: How to Read Implementation Programs
Maintaining the General Plan
Over time, the City’s population will likely increase, its goals will evolve, and the physical environment will change. In order for the General Plan to remain relevant to current needs, it must be monitored and periodically revised to respond to changing conditions and needs over time.
The General Plan should be reviewed annually, with a more comprehensive and thorough review and revision done every ten years to reflect changes in local conditions, new local priorities, or State law. Though not required, many cities and counties will undertake a technical review of their general plan five years after adoption. State law permits the General Plan to be amended up to four times in any calendar year unless special conditions apply as defined by 839
1. INTRODUCTION
Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025 | INT-19
Government Code Sections 65358(c) and (d). Each amendment may contain more than one change to the General Plan.
General Plan Amendments can be initiated by the City or at the request of a property owner. Each General Plan Amendment is subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and goes through a public review process, including hearings with the Planning Commission and City Council.
While specific findings may be applied on a project-by-project basis, at a minimum the following standard findings shall be made for each proposed General Plan amendment:
1. The amendment is deemed to be in the public interest;
2. The amendment is consistent and/or compatible with the rest of the General Plan and any implementation programs that may be affected;
3. The potential impacts of the amendment have been
assessed and have been determined not to be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and
4. The amendment has been processed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the California Government Code, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the City’s Municipal Code.
City-initiated amendments, as well as amendments requested by other public agencies, are subject to the same basic process described above to ensure consistency and compatibility with the General Plan. This includes appropriate environmental review, public notice, and public hearings, leading to an official action by the City Council.
840
INT-20 | Public Review Draft Introduction | May 2025
This page is intentionally left blank.
841
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-1
Land Use
The Land Use Element goals, policies, and programs strategically accommodate future growth and community vision while preserving and enhancing the qualities that make American Canyon a great place to live and work. The Element contains the Land Use Diagram, a map of land uses within the planning area, and a description of the land use designations.
2 842
LU-2 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025
This page is intentionally left blank.
843
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-3
Land Use Diagram and
Designations
The Land Use Element designates land uses that achieve the development vision for the city through the 2040 planning horizon year.
The core of the Land Use Element is the land use diagram and land use designations that distinguish the various land uses in the City. Corresponding levels of intensity, density, and allowable uses are defined in this section, as required by Government Code Section 65302(a).
The General Plan development projections were determined by analyzing vacant and underutilized parcels within the city and the realistic level of development potential based on what is allowed under the applicable land use designation factoring for known physical constraints and/or regulatory requirements.
Planning Boundaries
The following planning boundaries are recognized as part of the American Canyon General Plan:
• City Limit. The political boundary within the incorporated city limits.
American Canyon has land use authority over all land within its city limits.
• Sphere of Influence. The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) establishes the Sphere of Influence (SOI), which defines the probable future incorporated City boundary. An SOI typically includes areas where the City already has or plans to have responsibility to provide municipal facilities and services.
• Urban Limit Line. The City’s Urban Limit Line was adopted by the City Council in response to a 2008 voter initiative (Resolution 2008-106).
This Urban Limit Line was coordinated with Napa County to be consistent with the County’s General Plan and City-centered urban growth policies. The 2040 General Plan extends the existing ULL indefinitely from a 2030 expiration date and includes consideration of an addition of the Hess/Laird Property northeast of the city’s current Important Note
It is common for the Land Use
Diagram to be updated over
time. Please check with the
American Canyon Community
Development Department,
Planning Division, to ensure
you have the current version.
844
LU-4 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025
ULL which addition will occur concurrently with the indefinite extension of the ULL. Justification: The CEQA NOP includes the Hess/Laird property as Future Study area, not an outright addition to the ULL.
• General Plan Planning Area. A General Plan, pursuant to State law, must address all areas within the jurisdiction’s Planning Area that bears a physical relationship to the long-term planning of the city.
Consistent with this principle, the General Plan Planning Area includes the City of American Canyon Water and Sewer Service area, City, SOI, and ULL. Unincorporated Napa County has land use authority within the Extraterritorial Water and Sewer Service area, however, as the Water and Sewer Service provider, the City’s Extraterritorial Water and Sewer Service area bears relation to the City’s planning consistent with Gov. Code §65300.
Figure LU-1, the General Plan Planning Area Diagram, shows the planning boundaries that make up the General Plan Planning Area. 845
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-5
Figure LU-1 Planning Area Boundary
LAFCO Resolution 2025-06 added
Green Island Vineyards to the SOI
846
LU-6 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025
Land Use Diagram
Figure LU-1, the General Plan Land Use Diagram, shows the distribution of the land use designations within the City’s Planning Area. There are 14 residential, commercial, mixed-use, and public/quasi-public uses land use designations within the City’s Planning Area.
The Land Use Diagram is intended to be more general than the Zoning Map.
While the Land Use Diagram guides zoning, it is not the same as the City’s Zoning Map. Each land use designation has one or more corresponding compatible zoning districts. Whereas the land use designations are intentionally broad, the zoning designations are more detailed and provide specific development standards, including permitted and conditional uses, building heights, setbacks, lot coverage, and parking requirements.
Land Use Designations
Table LU-1 describes the land use designations along with their corresponding density/intensity standards:
• Designation. This provides the name of each land use designation and the acronym used when referring to the designation.
• Color. Each land use designation has an assigned color used in the Land Use Diagram (Figure LU-2).
• Description. This describes the purpose and application of each land use designation. The City’s Zoning regulations provide further detail about uses allowed and permitted in zoning districts that implement the land use designations.
• Density/Intensity Standards. This describes development density or intensity. Designations allowing residential uses include a minimum and maximum density, expressed as dwelling units per acre (du/ac).
Non-residential uses include maximum building intensity standards, expressed as Floor Area Ratio (FAR), which is defined below. Most non-residential land use designations also allow residential uses and include density standards as well.
847
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-7
Residential Density
Development is defined by allowed density (minimum
and maximum) measured in dwelling units per acre
(du/ac). Residential density is calculated by dividing the number of dwelling units on a site (excluding accessory dwelling units) by the gross acreage of the site. The
image to the right shows prototypical examples of
different residential densities for one-acre properties.
State planning law requires general plans to include
standards for measuring population density. Population
density is determined by multiplying the maximum
number of dwelling units allowed in a given land use
designation by the average number of persons per household (as determined by the California Department of Finance). Standards of density for residential uses are stated as the allowable range (i.e., minimum and maximum) of dwelling units per gross acre (du/ac).
Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
Standards of building intensity for nonresidential uses such as office, commercial, industrial, and institutional development are defined in terms of floor area ratio (FAR). FAR is an indicator of how much building space is permitted on a given site. In the case of mixed-use developments that include residential uses, density standards are applied to the residential component while FAR standards are applied to the nonresidential component. A site includes all contiguous parcels that will share parking or access. 848
LU-8 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025
While FAR provides overall development intensity, it does not specify the form or character of the building. Different configurations of the same FAR can result in buildings of different character. To encourage building configurations of allowed FARs consistent with community vision, zoning regulations identify height limits, building setbacks, lot coverage, or open space requirements to guide the form of buildings with a given FAR.
849
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-9
LU-Figure 2: Land Use Diagram
LAFCO Resolution 2025-06 added
Green Island Vineyards to the SOI
850
LU-10 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 LU-Table 1: Land Use Designations
Residential Estate (RE)
This designation allows for single-family residential development. This designation is characterized by detached single-family residences on large parcels. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 1.7 and Policy 1.7.1 modified)
Density/Intensity Range
• Density: 1.0 to 2.0 du/ac
• Intensity: N/A
Residential Low (RL)
This designation allows for single-family residential development in both an attached and detached format. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 1.7 and Policy 1.7.2 modified)
Density/Intensity Range
• Density: 2.0 to 5.0 du/ac
• Intensity: N/A
Residential Medium (RM)
This designation allows for the development of multi-family dwellings and mobile home parks. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 1.8, modified) Density/Intensity Range
• Density: 5.0 to 12.0 du/ac
• Intensity: N/A
Residential High (RH)
This designation allows for the development of multi-family dwellings at a variety of densities. This designation also includes two sub-designation of RH-1 and RH-2. The only difference between the two sub-designations is the allowable density. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 1.8 and Policy 1.8.2, modified) Density/Intensity Range
• Density:
• RH-1: 16.0 to 20.0 du/ac
o RH-2: 0.0 to 20.0 du/ac
• Intensity: N/A
851
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-11 Commercial Recreation (CR)
This designation allows for allows for development of recreation and winery-oriented.
Density/Intensity Range
• Density:
• CR: None.
• Intensity: None.
Industrial (I)
This designation allows for the continuation of existing and development of new industries that capitalize upon the geographic advantages of the City (including adjacency to Napa County Airport and the railroad), the agricultural production of the region, and emerging types of businesses (such as "thematic" and "environmental" based industries), offer opportunities for the clustering of key economic sectors, and maintain the environmental quality of the City. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective
1.22, modified)
Density/Intensity Range
• Density: N/A
• Intensity: 0.5 to 0.7 FAR
Public (P)
This designation allows for the continuation of existing and expansion of governmental administrative, recreation, public safety, human service, cultural and educational, infrastructure, utility infrastructure, and other public land uses and facilities to support the existing and future population and development of the City. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 1.23, modified)
Density/Intensity Range
• Density: N/A
• Intensity: N/A
Open Space (OS)
This designation preserves the important environmental resources of the City including significant wildlife habitats and vegetation, hillsides and canyons, creeks, rivers, and wetlands. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 1.24) Density/Intensity Range
• Density: N/A
• Intensity: N/A
852
LU-12 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 Specific Plan (SP)
This designation reserves land for designated specific plans within the City. (Source: New Text)
Density/Intensity Range
• Density: Dependent on the approval of individual Specific Plans. • Intensity: Dependent on the approval of individual Specific Plans.
Specific Study (SS)
This designation allows certain parcels as "special study" areas that may be needed for future urban growth, but for which appropriate land use designations have yet to be determined. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 1.25, modified) Density/Intensity Range
• Density: N/A
• Intensity: N/A
Town Center (TC)
This designation allows for the development of a Town Center that physically and functionally serves as the symbolic and identifiable focus of community activities and events for the City and which is a regional destination within Napa Valley. The Town Center shall have two principal land use areas: (s) Town Center Core Area, and (b) Town Center Residential Neighborhoods. The Town Center Core Area shall mean the area around the basalt industrial ruins which will be developed with the land uses to create a true "downtown” for American Canyon. The Town Center Residential Neighborhoods shall mean the residential areas portion of Town Center that surrounds the Town Center Core Area. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 1.19, modified) Density/Intensity Range
• Density: Dependent on the approval of individual Specific Plans. • Intensity: Dependent on the approval of individual Specific Plans.
Future Study Area
As part of the General Plan Update the City identified a future study area (Figure LU-3) that has the potential for additional growth. This future study area encompasses the Hess/Laird property which is currently located within the jurisdiction of Napa County and was recently general planned and rezoned for industrial uses. As a Future Study Area, the general plan does not identify specific uses for the Hess/Laird property under CEQA at this time. Thus, it would be speculative to evaluate any such uses at this time.
When the City evaluates this Study Area for inclusion in the City’s Urban Limit Line, the process will evaluate future uses as part of a subsequent CEQA 853
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-13 analysis. is not within the Urban Limit Line (ULL) for American Canyon. At this time the General Plan does not anticipate growth for this future study area within the horizon year of this Plan but is highlighting it for future potential if and when the City decides to expand. Justification: The new language further explains the reason for not identifying a land use in the Hess/Laird Future Study Area.
854
LU-14 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 LU-Figure 3: Future Study Area
Future
Study
Area
855
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-15 Goals and Policies
Growth Management and Phasing
The City of American Canyon was incorporated on January 1, 1992. Since then, the City has grown to a population of more than 21,000. American Canyon is home to three elementary schools, one middle school and one high school and dozens of businesses. Positioned along Highway 29 in Southern Napa County, the City is the SF Bay Area’s entry point to the Napa and Sonoma Valley wineries.
The City’s focus is on strengthening the local economy and increasing job opportunities in American Canyon to enable more residents to work closer to home and sustain and enhance the long-term economic viability of the City.
The City is also focused on capitalizing on tourism and preserving the unique environmental resources and character of the area. Revitalization of vacant and underutilized properties and quality new development are key to the city’s future. Policies in this section give American Canyon the tools to grow and change through 2040. They provide structure and guidance, while allowing flexibility to adapt to economic, environmental, and social change.
Goal LU-1:
Establish American Canyon as a "complete city” with a diversity of distinct land uses that serve the needs of residents, businesses, and visitors. (Source:
Existing Goals 1.1A and 1.1C, modified)
Policies
LU-1.1: Balance of Land Uses. Establish a diversity of land use designations that provide for housing, commercial,
employment, educational, cultural, entertainment, and
recreation needs of residents; capture visitor and tourist activity; provide employment opportunities for residents of the greater subregion; and provide open space and aesthetic relief from developed urban/suburban areas. (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.1.1 and Objective 1.1.1, modified)
LU-1.2: Pattern of Development. Support a pattern of development that establishes distinct neighborhoods, districts, places of community activity and culture and open spaces that are 856
LU-16 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 interlinked and promote a cohesive image; locates jobs, commerce, recreation, and other places of community activity within close proximity to housing, minimizing the need for vehicular use; achieves a balance of uses to serve both sides of Highway 29; and establishes an overall compact urban form surrounded by open space. (Source: Existing Objective 1.1.4, modified)
LU-1.3: Open Space. Provide adequate open space and recreational facilities to ensure a high-quality environment for American Canyon's residents. (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.1.5)
LU-1.4: Compact Development Pattern. Maintain a compact development pattern that fosters a walkable and bikeable urban form. (Source: New Policy)
LU-1.5: Infrastructure Coordination. Ensure new development consistent with the Land Use Plan is coordinated with
adequate public infrastructure (e.g., transportation facilities, capital improvements, wastewater collection and treatment, water supply, electrical, natural gas, telecommunications, solid waste disposal, and storm drainage) and public services (e.g., governmental administrative, police, fire, recreation). (Source: Existing Objective 1.1.3 and Policy 1.1.3.1, modified) Residential
Residential neighborhoods provide the heart of daily life and social interactions with friends, family, and neighbors. The General Plan encourages residential neighborhoods with connectivity, pedestrian safety, neighborhood character, and housing choice.
Goal LU-2:
New and expanded residential neighborhoods include a range of housing opportunities to meet the physical, economic, and social needs of the population, are designed to exhibit a high quality and character, contain appropriate supporting services, and reflect their environmental setting. (Source: Existing Goal1.1E, modified)
LU-2.1: Housing Inclusiveness. Within each neighborhood support development of diverse housing types and lot sizes to
857
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-17 accommodate a range of affordability levels and socioeconomic diversity. (Source: New Policy) LU-2.2: Provide Public Facilities and Parks. Establish and maintain public facility and park standards for new residential and commercial development. (Source: New Policy)
LU-2.3: Objective Design Standards. Establish objective design standards that convey a high level of quality and character in new residential development. (Source: Existing Policies 1.1.7.4 and 1.1.8.4, modified)
LU-2.4: Nonresidential Structures in Residential Neighborhoods.
Require nonresidential structures in new development (e.g., recreation facilities, community meeting rooms and
auditoriums, neighborhood commercial, services, and
religious facilities) be designed to be compatible with and convey the visual and physical scale and character of
residential structures.
LU-2.5: Active Transportation. Increase walking and bicycling opportunities by implementing pedestrian and bicycle plans and link recreation and commercial services to residential areas with safe and protected pedestrian walkways and
bicycle paths (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.1.1.6, modified) Commercial
Commercial uses provide needed retail goods and services for residents, employees, and visitors. They are places for commerce, employment, entertainment, culture, and, in some case, living in proximity to these uses.
Pedestrian-oriented activities are encouraged that welcome customers with plazas and informal gathering places. Commercial uses accommodate development of property exclusively for commercial and employment uses (without housing) and/or mixed-use projects that integrate housing with retail, office, community facilities, and other uses within the same structure or on the same site. They can also integrate community-serving uses, such as public meeting rooms and daycare facilities in key activity areas. Commercial uses should be designed to operate in harmony with adjacent neighborhoods and uses through the siting of buildings, transitions in scale, and land use mix 858
LU-18 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 Goal LU-3:
Attractive and vibrant neighborhoods, community, and regional commercial centers with convenient shopping, services, entertainment, and social interaction. (Source: New Goal)
LU-3.1: Diversity of Commercial Uses. Provide for a diversity of retail and service commercial uses that support multiple
neighborhoods and the greater community, reduce the need for trips to adjacent jurisdictions for goods and services, and provide shopping and service opportunities for commuters, visitors, and tourists. (Source: Existing Objectives 1.1.1.4 and
1.1.1.5 modified)
LU-3.2: Unique Viewsheds. Accommodate commercial uses on Oat Hill that capitalize on the unique views of the Napa River, San Francisco Bay, and Napa Valley, site topography, and other natural characteristics. (Source: Existing Objective 1.1.1.7.1, modified)
LU-3.3: Unwanted Glare. Prevent glare with commercial lighting designed to illuminate within the property line in accordance with safety standards. (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.1.8.3, modified)
LU-3.4: High Activity Areas. Require entertainment, drinking establishments, and other uses provide adequate physical, safety, and operational measures. (Source: Existing Policy
1.1.1.8.4 modified)
LU-3.5: Napa River Public Access. Encourage development of a kayak launching facility on the Napa River. (Source: Existing Policy
1.1.2.1.2, modified)
Goal LU-4:
Improve the appearance and functionality of the Highway 29 corridor and establish a Town Center to provide for economically sound local- serving commercial development. (Source: Existing Goal 3.3.B, modified) LU-4.1: Retail and Office Development. Designate enough land to attract new retail and office development to meet the needs 859
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-19 of the current and projected residents, as well as to retain potential sales tax revenue in the City. (Source: Existing Objective 3.3.6 and Policy 3.3.6.1, modified)
LU-4.2: Tourism. Provide and promote opportunities for uses which capitalize on the City's proximity to the wine country and the airport, as well as take advantage of the City' s natural resources, including tourist- supported commercial activities, such as a wine train depot, winery outlets, hotel, and golf course. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.6.2)
LU-4.3: Diversification. Diversify by attracting, promoting, and retaining small businesses, establishing the City's niche as a provider of specialty stores and a broad range of services. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.6.4)
LU-4.4: Business Retention. Establish an outreach program to encourage existing businesses that are in conformance with the General Plan to remain in or at their current locations. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.6.5, modified)
LU-4.5: High Sales Tax Generating Uses. Modify existing zoning regulations as necessary to encourage long-term retention of high sales tax generating uses, such as lumber yards. (Source:
Existing Policy 3.3.6.6)
LU-4.6: Commercial Uses in Industrial Zones. Increase the flexibility of industrial zoning regulations to allow for certain types of specialty retail uses that are compatible with industrial uses. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.6.7)
LU-4.7: Highway 29 Improvements. Enhance the City' s existing tax base through the improvement and maintenance of the
Highway 29 commercial corridor, (Source: Existing Objective
3.3.7)
LU-4.8: Small Scale Commercial Development. Provide for small scale commercial development that would serve residents as well as take advantage of tourism or commuter traffic. (Source:
Existing Policy 3.3.7.2)
LU-4.9: Commercial Clustering. Encourage the clustering of commercial activities along Highway 29 to provide more
860
LU-20 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 attractive and cohesive facilities while minimizing potential circulation conflicts. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.7.3) LU-4.10: Create Town Center. Improve and strengthen the City' s identity though the creation of a Town Center as the principal government and commercial center and designate enough
land to accommodate future demand for neighborhood and
community- serving retail and commercial development.
(Source: Existing Objective 3.3.8 and Policy 3.3.8.1, modified) LU-4.11: Small Community Atmosphere. Encourage the development of small specialty stores in the Town Center to promote a small community atmosphere. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.8.3, modified)
LU-4.12: Marketing Program. Periodically assess market conditions, including population growth in the City and neighboring Vallejo and when appropriate, establish an aggressive
marketing program to effectively compete with neighboring cities to attract desired commercial uses. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.8.4)
Industrial
Industrial centers provide manufacturing, research and development, flex space, industry incubators, and similar uses that range from business parks, warehouses, and distribution facilities to manufacturing. This designation supports “clean” industries and agricultural and wine-related industries that take advantage of the education and skills of the local and regional population.
Industrial designations promote improvements in site planning to create places with attractive architecture and landscaping, and make employment areas accessible to pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit. They also support the integration of limited additional employment support uses such as retail and services.
Goal LU-5:
Industrial usesthat provide employment for residents of American Canyon and the surrounding region and contribute significant revenue for the City. (Source:
Existing Goal 1.1.I)
861
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-21 LU-5.1: Industrial Development Compatibility with Existing Uses.
Require new industrial development be designed to achieve a high level of quality and compatibility with existing uses including architectural treatment of all building elevations; use of extensive landscape along the primary street frontages and parking lots; and enclosure of storage areas visible from principal highways (including Highway 29) and peripheral residential and commercial districts with decorative screening or other elements. (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.2.2.4, modified) LU-5.2: Industrial Development Unified Character. Require new industrial development be designed to convey a unified
character by inclusion of pedestrian walkways, arcades, an/or other visual elements to interconnect individual buildings; differentiation of building facades by materials, color, architectural details, and modulation of building volumes; use of consistent and well-designed public and informational signage; and installation of elements that define the key entries to the industrial district. (Source: Existing Policy
1.1.2.2.5, modified)
LU-5.3: Truck Access. Require truck access be controlled so it is safe and efficient and minimizes exposure to adjacent residential neighborhoods. (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.2.2.7)
LU-5.4: Industrial Operations. Require, where industrial uses are located adjacent to residential neighborhoods, that their operations be controlled to prevent adverse impacts on
adjacent property (e.g., noise, light and glare, and odors) and appropriate measures implemented to buffer these uses (e.g., setbacks, landscaping, and earthen berms). (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.2.2.8, modified)
LU-5.5: Prevent Adverse Impacts. Control, through the permit process, the development of industrial uses that use, store, produce, or transport hazardous materials in threshold
planning quantities, generate unacceptable levels of noise or air emissions, or result in other impacts that adversely impact American Canyon. (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.2.2.9, modified) 862
LU-22 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 Goal LU-6:
A diversified industrial base that provides employment opportunities for residents and generatesfiscal revenues for the City. (Source: Existing Goal 3.3.A modified)
LU-6.1: New Compatible Industries. Increase the number of firms within the industries now represented in the City and capture new, clean, nonpolluting industries that are stable and compatible with City needs in terms of traffic, air quality, and employment. (Source: Existing Objective 3.3.4.1)
LU-6.2: Industrial Development Standards. Establish design and FAR standards for industrial buildings which will create and maintain an attractive image for American Canyon's industrial areas without imposing overly restrictive regulations. (Source:
Existing Policy 3.3.4.2)
LU-6.3: State grants. Pursue available state grants that would assist the City and private property owners in enhancing
infrastructure in the industrial areas. (Source: Existing Policy
3.3.4.4)
LU-6.4: Accommodate Projected Industrial Growth. Designate enough land to accommodate projected demand for industrial space by 2040. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.5.1, modified) LU-6.5: ULL Amendment. Expand the Urban Limit Line to include the “Hess and Laird” Properties north side of the Paoli Property and maintain the existing Urban Limit Line when the Urban Limit Line Initiative expires in 2030. (Source: New Policy) Justification: Delete this policy because it is redundant with Policy LU11-1.
LU-6.6: SOI Amendment. Work with Napa County and LAFCO to amend the City's Sphere of Influence to include the “Hess and Laird” Properties. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.5.2 modified) Justification: This policy will be restated according to Planning Commission direction and relocated to a new Policy LU-11.2. 863
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-23 Public and Institutional
American Canyon has many public and private institutional uses, that provide government services, education, recreation, and medical services. This goal and its supporting policies are designed to ensure that public and institutional land uses enhance the quality of life of residents and meet the service needs of the community. Policies encourage public and quasi-public uses to be designed and operated in a manner that is compatible with surrounding properties.
Goal LU-7:
Sufficient public and institutional uses that meet the needs of the residents of American Canyon. Source: Existing Goal 1.1.J modified)
LU-7.1: Adequate Public Facilities. Provide governmental administrative, recreation, public safety, human service, cultural and educational, infrastructure, utility infrastructure, and other public land uses and facilities to support the existing and future population and development of the City. (Source:
Existing Objective 1.1.2.3, modified)
LU-7.2: Electric Transmission Corridors. Limit the development of uses within electrical transmission corridors to ensure adequate public health and safety. (Source: Existing Policy
1.1.2.3.2, modified)
LU-7.3: Utility Modernization. Coordinate new development with policies in the Utility Element to improve American Canyon’s resilience to increasing utility demands and system hardening to climate change and natural disasters. (New Policy)
LU-7.4: Public Facility design. Establish standards for the City and coordinate with other public agencies to ensure that public buildings and sites are designed to be compatible in scale, mass, character, and architecture with the existing buildings and pertinent design characteristics prescribed by this General Plan for the district or neighborhood in which they are located. (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.2.3.7)
LU-7.5: PG&E Facility Landscaping. Work with Pacific Gas and Electric Company to facilitate landscaping of their site and facilities at 864
LU-24 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 the intersection of Highway 29 and American Canyon Road. (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.2.3.9)
Neighborhoods, Boulevards, and Districts
American Canyon features safe and friendly residential neighborhoods, a few notable rural residential areas, an increasing balance of needed multi-family communities; a commercial core centered along Broadway, a vibrant, growing industrial park to the north, and open space that envelopes the City to the east and west.
The goal and policies in this section are intended to support the continued development of unique neighborhoods, boulevards, and districts.
Goal LU-8:
Harmonize new neighborhoods and districtsinto the existing community fabric. (Source: Existing Goal 1.1.M Modified)
LU-8.1: Distinct Neighborhoods, Boulevards, and Districts. Assure that new development supports the differentiation of the neighborhoods, boulevards, and districts of the City by their functional role, uses, form, scale, and character of
development. (Source: Existing Objective 1.1.2.6, modified) LU-8.2: Objective design and Development Standards. Require new development to comply with the City’s objective design and development standards to maintain long- term, high-quality development. (Source: Existing Objective 1.1.3.3, modified) LU-8.3: Placemaking. Encourage development of an “American Canyon Vernacular” architectural style by encouraging new development to reflect the architectural styles of newer development located nearby. (Source: New Policy)
LU-8.4: Public Gathering Spaces. Encourage new retail development to include formal and informal public gathering spaces
through a variety of means, such as pedestrian-oriented street design; sidewalk furniture and pedestrian-oriented
development; well-designed, multi-use public spaces of
different sizes including pocket parks, plazas, and monuments; and community events. (Source: New Policy)
865
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-25 LU-8.5: Public Art. Encourage new development to include public artwork and accommodate public art at key gateways, parks, open spaces, trails, and public gathering places. (Source: New Policy)
Airport Compatibility
Napa County Airport abuts the City Urban Limit Line. This represents both an opportunity and a constraint. The airport provides an economic stimulus for the development of industries and commercial businesses in American Canyon. Airport operations result in noise and the potential risk of accidents that impact nearby land uses. The goals and policies in this section are intended to mitigate any potential hazards and assure compatibility of new development with the airport.
The Napa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (NALUCP) was adopted by the Napa County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) on December 4, 2024. The NALUCP is incorporated into the General Plan as a standalone document identified as Appendix 3 Napa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. (Source: NALUCP Section 1.4.2, bullet option #3) Goal LU-9:
Ensure the compatibility of development within American Canyon is consistent with the Napa County Airport Land Use Plan. (Source: Existing Goal 1.N) LU-9.1: Airport Constraints Compatibility. Ensure new development does not adversely constrain the Napa County Airport.
(Source: Existing Objective 1.1.2.7, modified)
Within the time limits specified by Government Code
65302.3(a), the City shall amend, as applicable, the zoning ordinance and specific plan(s). (Source: NALUCP Section 1.4.2, bullet option #3)
LU-9.2: Land Use Compatibility Nonconforming Uses. The City shall amend the Zoning Ordinance to incorporate policies that address changes to existing nonconforming uses consistent with the NALUCP. (Source: NALUCP Policy 3.7.3 and 3.7.4) Require new development or expansion of existing uses
evaluate the Napa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan 866
LU-26 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 and Airport Compatibility Zones "A" through "E". (Source:
Existing Policies 1.1.2.7.1 and 1.1.2.7.2, modified)
LU-9.3: Airport Authority Coordination. Consistent with Public Utilities Code Section 21676(b), prior to approving Actions indicated in Paragraphs (a) and (b), the City shall refer the Action to the ALUC for determination of consistency with this ALUCP.
(a) Land Use Actions always requiring ALUC review
include:
(1) Local Agency adoption or approval of any new general plan, specific plan, or facility master plan, or any amendment thereto, that affects lands within an Airport Influence Area.
This includes actions that are applicable throughout a land use jurisdiction as well as for development proposals for an individual site.
(2) Local Agency adoption or approval of a zoning
ordinance or building regulation, including any proposed change or variance to any such ordinance or regulation, that (1) affects land within an Airport Influence Area and (2) involves the types of airport impact concerns listed in Policy
2.3.1(a).
(3) Land Use Actions for which a Special Conditions
Exception is being sought under Policy 3.2.4.
Work with the Napa County Airport Authority to ensure that ground activities and operations, operation expansion, and vehicle access at the Airport do not adversely impact (e.g., noise, vibration, air emissions, or other pollution) the city of American Canyon. (Source: Existing Policies 1.1.2.7.3,
1.1.2.7.4, and 1.1.2.7.5, modified)
LU-9.4: Emergency Preparedness. Projects Exempt from the NALUCP.
The NALUCP does not apply to Existing Land Uses as described in California Public Utilities Code 21670(a) and 21674 (a).
Work with the Napa County Airport Authority and other
appropriate agencies to ensure that emergency preparedness plans are maintained and regularly updated to protect
867
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-27 American Canyon residents and property. (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.2.7.6, modified)
LU-9.5: Airport Benefits. Projects Subject to City Review Except for projects that require Napa County Airport Land Use
Commission Review or are Exempt, all new development
within the City that is subject to the NALUCP shall be
evaluated consistent with the procedures in NALUCP Section
5.1. Recognize the importance of the Napa County Airport to city residents, including the economic, transportation and recreational benefits, and ensure that land use decisions do not negatively impact Airport operations. (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.2.7.7, modified)
Quality of the Built Environment
American Canyon has a unique identity that the General Plan seeks to enhance by providing a policy framework for the preservation of resource lands and the design of new development. Tasteful development projects, beautiful landscaping, and a lack of visual clutter create an appealing community for residents and visitors. American Canyon has many areas with excellent community design characteristics, and others that need attention. The policies in this section seek to ensure neighborhoods are developed and maintained as high-quality living environments that support American Canyon’s community character.
Goal LU-10:
Foster a community image that promotes and enhances American Canyon as a desirable place to live and do business. (Sources: New Goal) LU-10.1: City Gateway. Seek to improve the scenic character of SR 29 as an important gateway into the City, through
undergrounding utilities, increased landscaping, street tree planting, and appropriate architectural character. (Source:
New Policy)
LU-10.2: City Identity. Promote public art, historical structures, and landmarks to reinforce American Canyon’s identity. (Source:
New Policy)
868
LU-28 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 LU-10.3: City Livability. Promote a diversity of compatible land uses throughout the City to enable people to live close to job locations, have adequate and convenient commercial services, and enjoy public amenities and services such as transit, parks, trails, and schools. (Source: New Policy)
LU-10.4: City Livability. Support an active and comfortable public realm by incorporating street trees, shade opportunities, benches, trash receptacles, public restrooms, and other features that contribute to an attractive and enjoyable space in city parks, trails, and streetscapes. (Source: New Policy)
LU-10.5: Economic Adaptation. Support flexibility in land uses designations to respond to changing and evolving economic needs. (Source: New Policy)
LU-10.6: Landscaping Plans. Require that new development subject to discretionary review submit and implement a landscaping plan consistent with City standards and requirements.
(Source: Existing Policy 1.1.3.2.2, modified)
LU-10.7: Property Maintenance. Require properties be properly maintained consistent with the neighborhood preservation ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 9.04) and discretionary development conditions of approval. (Source: Existing Policy
1.1.3.2.3, modified)
LU-10.8: Preserve Existing Trees and Vegetation. Require new development to preserve and incorporate existing mature and specimen trees and other significant vegetation into project design. (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.3.2.4, modified)
LU-10.9: Zero Water Footprint. Require new development offset the amount of increased potable water that will be consumed by their project on a one-to-one basis, including using water efficient fixtures, consuming recycled water for non-potable uses when available, dual plumbing buildings, installing water wise landscaping and irrigation, and other appropriate
measures. (Source: Zero Water Footprint Policy)
LU-10.10: Code Enforcement. Actively enforce City codes to eliminate abandoned, wrecked, or inoperative vehicles in the front yards; overgrown weeds or unsafe or unsanitary living
869
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-29 conditions; accumulated trash and debris; and address other property maintenance issues to assure high-quality
neighborhoods, commercial districts, and industrial areas. (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.3.3.5, modified)
LU-10.11: Property Maintenance Programs. Promote programs and work with local service organizations and educational
institutions to inform residential, commercial, and industrial property owners and tenants regarding methods for the
maintenance and upkeep of their property. (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.3.3.6)
LU-10.12: Community-based Maintenance Efforts. Require communityand neighborhood-based efforts for the maintenance, upkeep, and renovation of structures and sites. (Source:
Existing Policy 1.1.3.3.7)
LU-10.13: Climate Change Adaptation. Support efforts to construct needed infrastructure that helps the City adapt to Climate Change. (Source: New Policy)
LU-10.14: Safe Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility. Improve bicycle and pedestrian safety throughout the City, consistent with the Mobility Element and implementing programs, such as Local Roadway Safety Plan. (Source: New Policy)
LU-10.15: Housing Inclusion. Incorporate a variety of housing types into future development that is available to a range of incomes. (Source: New Policy)
Urban Limit Line
Goal LU-11:
Maintain an Urban Limit Line for the City of American Canyon which describes its future geographic boundary until January 1, 2040. (Source: Existing Goal
1.1.T)Justification: The Urban Limit Line expiration date will depend upon other factors, such as an initiative, or subsequent legal agreement, etc.
LU-11.1: Lands Outside the Urban Limit Line. Meet and confer with Napa County to ensure Ensure that lands outside of the City 870
LU-30 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 Urban Limit Line, as it may be amended the Urban Limit Line during the term of the General Plan, shall not be developed until January 1, 2040, or later, except as provided by Policy LU11.2 below. (Source: Existing Policy 1.1.3.5.3) Justification:
The city cannot ensure development does not occur outside of the city limits. The Hess/Laird properties, and perhaps others, such as the Green Island Vineyards will necessitate a discussion with Napa County on one or more amendments to the ULL.
LU-11.2: Public Uses Outside the Urban Limit Line. Acquire lands for public uses and construct and operate public facilities outside of the City Urban Limit Line, if necessary and appropriate, provided that those facilities are designed to serve
development within the City Urban Limit Line. (Source:
Existing Policy 1.1.3.5.4)
LU-11.3: Preserve Agriculture and Open Space. Define the limits of urban development of the City, thus preserving agricultural and open space outside of the City Urban Limit Line as it may be amended during the term of this General Plan on a longterm basis. (Source: Existing Objective 1.1.3.6) Justification:
The city does not have direct influence on land uses outside the city limits. The ULL is the City’s contribution to further the County’s efforts to sustain agriculture uses in Napa County.
LU-11.4: Orderly, Sequential Annexation. Annex urbanized and vacant areas in the City's Sphere of Influence and Urban Limit Line in an orderly progressive sequence. (Source: Existing Program
3.13.2 modified)
LU-11.5: SOI Amendment. Work Meet and confer with Napa County and LAFCO to amend the City's Sphere of Influence to include the “Hess and Laird” Properties and other properties at the direction of the City Council. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.5.2 modified) Justification: Amended and restated Policy LU-6.5.
Amendments to the SOI are subject to a meet and confer
process.
871
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-31 Economic Development
The City recognizes that it can facilitate private-sector investment and the creation of jobs by creating a business-friendly climate. The type and supply of the employment land uses in the city also provide important indicators of the ability of the City to meet the needs of the changing economy. Policies in this section seek to protect the industrial and commercial lands that provide jobs to many American Canyon. The policies also stress the importance of fair and predictable permit procedures, the removal of unnecessary regulatory barriers, and economic development programs as ways to attract privatesector investment to American Canyon.
Goal LU-12:
Improve the well-being of the entire community by leveraging job creation from medium to large- scale private construction projects to benefit American Canyon residents and the local economy. (Source: New Goal) LU-12.1: Living Wages. Require medium to large-scale private construction projects in American Canyon provide residents with employment opportunities that offer living wages and benefits. (Source: New Objective)
LU-12.2: Local Pool of Skilled Labor. Increase the local pool of skilled construction labor in Napa and Solano County areas by
supporting apprentice programs for youth and veterans.
LU-12.3: Expedite New Construction Economic Benefits. Reduce time for private construction projects to be built, consume less time for city inspection, and enable new private construction projects to contribute to the City economy sooner by
implementing City regulations that require medium to largescale private construction projects in American Canyon hire skilled construction employees.
LU-12.4: New Construction to Hire Local Residents. Require medium to large private construction projects hire a minimum
percentage of workers that live within American Canyon and the surrounding communities of Napa and Solano Counties.
Justification: Proposed Goal and Policies articulate the April 1, 2025 Sheet Metal Union’s proposed General Plan policies.
872
LU-32 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 Goal LU-13:
Improve economic conditions in American Canyon by capitalizing on the City's industrial land and promoting a mix of land uses which create quality jobs and foster fiscal stability. (Source: Existing Goal 3.3, modified) LU-13.1: Maximize Economic Development. Support new industrial and business park and community-serving commercial
development to maximize the City's market and economic
development potential. (Source: Existing Objective 3.3.1, modified)
LU-13.2: Expand the Economic Base. Seek to expand the City's economic base and development opportunities through
planned annexation program that is linked to the General Plan. (I 3.2) (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.1.3, modified)
LU-13.3: Home-Based Businesses. Continue to facilitate home occupation uses to enable residents to work from home while maintaining the quality and character of existing residential neighborhoods. (Source: New Policy)
LU-13.4: Workforce Innovation. Consider specific needs for innovative businesses, including small businesses, incubator uses, livework spaces, artist studios, and small home-based businesses to foster entrepreneurship, workforce development, and
increased workforce participation. (Source: New Policy) LU-13.5: Best Practice Codes. Update zoning, building and property codes to conform with recent best practices. (Source: New Policy)
LU-13.6: Climate Adapted Utility Grid. Support efforts to develop a more resilient power grid by encouraging backup generators, home microgrids, and such as a solar energy systems with one or more electric battery storage backups and fossil fuel backup generators that meet the stringent emission standards set by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD).
(Source: New Policy)Justification: Input from OSATS pointing out that fossil fuel backup generators are regulated by BAAQMD.
873
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-33 LU-13.7: Internet of Things. Facilitate implementation of innovative electronic capabilities (IOT) with improved wireless
infrastructure technology throughout the city. (Source: New Policy)
LU-13.8: Positive Fiscal Impacts. Promote growth that generates net positive fiscal impacts to the City to ensure that municipal services keep up with growing demand. (Source: Existing Objective 3.3.2)
LU-13.9: Fiscal Impact Analysis. Require a fiscal impact analysis of new development to determine what costs of the new
development to the City, if any, may be subject to mitigation. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.2.1, modified)
LU-13.10: Fiscal Impact Monitoring. Monitor the fiscal impact of new development activity to determine the optimal development phasing of new development to ensure that the costs of City services are balanced with revenues generated on a recurring basis. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.2.2, modified)
LU-13.11: Rates, Taxes, and Fees Assessment. Periodically assess the structure of utility rates, business license taxes, and user fees to ensure that such rates and fees cover the true cost to the City. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.2.3)
LU-13.12: Streamlined One-stop Application Process. Expedite the growth of job-generating, quality businesses, and other high priority development by developing a streamlined, one-stop City application procedures. (Source: Existing Objective 3.3.3 and Policy 3.3.3.4, modified)
LU-13.13: New Use Performance Standards. Establish a standard performance base for new uses. If a proposed use conforms to established standards, eliminate, or reduce the level of discretionary review process. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.3.1) LU-13.14: Industrial Performance Standards. Continue implementation of zoning standards that ensure industrial development is designed and operated to minimize—to the extent feasible— noise, heat, glare, dust, unscreened storage yards, air emissions, hazardous materials generation, and other negative effects. (Source: New Policy).
874
LU-34 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 LU-13.15: Employment Retention. Support retention of industrial uses that provide high-paying local jobs within the City when possible. (Source: New Policy).
LU-13.16: Employee Services. Encourage development of supporting commercial services such as dining, recreation, and childcare in the City’s industrial areas to provide convenient access to services for industrial workers. (Source: New Policy).
LU-13.17: Occupancy Permit Requirements. Maintain occupancy permit requirements for new and existing buildings to monitor zoning compliance and business activity within the City. (Source:
Existing Policy 3.3.3.3)
LU-13.18: Development Review Process information. Prepare informational brochures that clearly describe the
development review process to the public. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.3.5, modified)
Goal LU-14:
Capitalize on the City's physical resources to generate private commercial recreational opportunities. (Source: Existing Goal 3.3.C, modified) LU-14.1: Commercial Recreation Opportunities. Explore opportunities to encourage private development related to commercial
recreation. (Source: Existing Objective 3.3.9 modified) LU-14.2: Private Partnerships. Seek opportunities to partner with private for-profit and nonprofit organizations to facilitate new recreational opportunities. (Source: New Policy)
LU-14.3: Land Use Strategies. Evaluate potential locations for commercial recreation opportunities that capitalize on the City’s physical resources and foster a healthier community. (Source: Existing Policy 3.3.9.1 modified)
General Plan Use and Maintenance
The American Canyon 2040 General Plan is designed to be a living document that reflects the City’s needs and desires, which will evolve over time. The effectiveness of the General Plan ultimately depends on how the City 875
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-35 implements and maintains the General Plan over its lifetime. This section is designed to ensure that the City reviews and updates this General Plan to respond to current community needs and aspirations, and changes in State law.
Goal LU-15:
An effective and implemented General Plan Land Use Map. (Source: Existing Goal 1.1.O, modified)
LU-15.1: Land Use Map. Maintain and implement a Land Use Map describing the types of allowed land uses by geographic location and the density of allowed uses within each
specifically identified designation (i.e., other than within the special study area). (Source: Existing Program 3.13.1,
modified)
LU-15.2: Zoning Designations. Amend zoning designations and maps to ensure they remain consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map (Figure LU-1). (Source: New Policy)
LU-15.3: Land Use Element Compliance. Implement the
Nonconforming Uses, Structures, and Lots zoning standards to existing structures and uses which do not conform with the Land Use Element requirements and standards. (Source:
Existing Objective 1.1.2.8, modified)
Goal LU-16:
A General Plan consistent with State law that provides a clear framework for ongoing administration, maintenance, with rigorous and efficient implementation. (Source: New Goal)
LU-16.1: Five-year General Plan Review. Conduct a technical review of the General Plan every five years and revise and update as necessary to assure compliance with State law and
responsiveness to current City needs, including a jobs/housing balance and adequate municipal revenues to maintain
adequate level of public services. (Source: New Policy) LU-16.2: Implementation Program Monitoring. Maintain and annually review the General Plan Implementation Programs. As part of 876
LU-36 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 this process, the City shall update the prioritization of programs based on applicability, relevance, timing of
initiation, and availability of funding. (Source: New Policy) LU-16.3: Housing Element Update. Update and implement a Housing Element every eight years that provides policy and programs to encourage the provision of safe, well-designed, accessible, sanitary, and affordable residential areas where people of all ages can live, work, and play. This includes an equitable distribution of parks and public facilities to all residential areas consistent with legal requirements. (Source: New Policy) LU-16.4: General Plan/Zoning Consistency. Review the Zoning Ordinance standards and amend as necessary to ensure
consistency with the General Plan. (Source: New Policy) LU-16.5: Zoning Standards Update. Periodically review the Zoning Ordinance to ensure that the appropriate zoning districts have appropriate allowed uses and development standards to
accommodate the building and site needs associated with new and emerging industries. (Source: New Policy)
LU-16.6: Programmatic Environmental Review. Take advantage of streamline development review by conducting Programmatic Environmental Review of General Plan Policies and
Development Review. (Source: New Policy)
LU-16.7: Community Outreach. Continually focus on improving methods to inform the public about land use policy
development and ongoing development decision making.
(Source: New Policy)
LU-16.8: Development Review Processes. Continually review development review processes to make them more
informative and easier to access through technological
capacity. (Source: New Policy)
LU-16.9: Implementation Partnerships. Maintain and expand upon General Plan implementation of highly technical service delivery through partnerships with other governmental
agencies and nonprofit organizations, such as the City of Napa’s implementation of affordable housing policy, Fair 877
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 | LU-37 Housing Napa Valley, Napa Sonoma ADU center and others. (Source: New Policy)
878
LU-38 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 Implementation Programs
Programs
Implements
Which
Policy(ies)
Responsible
Supporting
Department(s)
2020
– 2025
2026
– 2030
2031
– 2040
Annual
Ongoing
A Objecitve Design Standards
Prepare objecitve residential design
standards that reflect existing community
character and design as well as recent
development projects that are widely
accepted as successful, well-design
projects. The objective design standards
will enable to City to approved more
residential projects “by-right.” (Source:
New Program)
LU-2.4
LU-10.5
Community
Development
◼
B Industrial Marketing Program.
Support the Chamber of Commerce with its
efforts to market the City to new
businesses. (Source: : Existing Program
1.11.19, modified)
LU-6.2 City Manager
Chamber of
Commerce
◼
C Permit Processing and Streamlining.
Continually seek methods to streamline
permit processing that assures proactive
review of priority development applications
in desired areas. Assign a specific staff
member to coordinate the permit process
for high priority development applications.
Prepare brochures that clearly define the
development review process to the public.
(Source: Existing Program 3.13.8, modified)
LU-11.7 Community
Development
◼
D Implement the Broadway District Specific
Plan
Prepare a fee program or other funding
program to pay for needed amenities, such
as parks, landscaping, stormwater
improvements, bicyle trails, and overhead
utility undergrounding. (Source: New
Program)
LU-4.7
LU-4.8
LU-4.9
Finance
Department
Public Works
Parks and
Recreation
◼
879
2. LAND USE
Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025| LU-39
Programs
Implements
Which
Policy(ies)
Responsible
Supporting
Department(s)
2020
– 2025
2026
– 2030
2031
– 2040
Annual
Ongoing
E Fiscal Impact Analysis
Determine a threshold project size for new
development, above which a fiscal impact
analysis is required. Each fiscal impact
analysis shall analyze the potential projectspecific fiscal impacts and determine what costs to the City, if any, that may be subject
to mitigation. (Source: Existing Program
3.13.5, modified)
LU-11.4 City Manager
Community
Development
◼
F Fiscal Impact Monitoring. Annually
monitor the fiscal impact of new
development activity to determine the
optimal development phasing of new
development, according to its net positive
or negative fiscal impact. In addition to
monitoring the fiscal impact by type of
development, the fiscal impact of
development in different locations should
be monitored. The purpose of such
monitoring efforts is to ensure that the
costs of services are balanced with
revenues generated on a recurring basis.
(Source: Existing Program 3.13.5, modified)
LU-11.5 City Manager
Community
Development
◼
G Five Year General Plan Review.
Conduct a technical review of the General
Plan every five years and revise and update
as necessary to assure compliance with
State law and responsiveness to current
City needs, including a jobs/housing
balance and adequate municipal revenues
to maintain adequate level of public
services. (Source: New Program)
LU-15.1 Community
Development
◼ ◼
880
LU-40 | Public Review Draft Land Use Element | May 2025 This page is intentionally left blank.
881
3. HOUSING
Housing
State law recognizes the vital role local governments fulfill in the supply and affordability of housing.
State Law requires the American Canyon City Council to adopt a comprehensive, long-term General Plan for the physical development of the city. One of the seven mandated elements of the General Plan, the Housing Element is the City's key plan for addressing housing needs in through 2031. 6 TH Cycle Housing Element Certified
June 30, 2023
3 882
American Canyon 6th Cycle Housing Element Policy Document CERTIFIED | H-1 This page is intentionally left blank.
883
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-1
Mobility
The Mobility Element provides a framework for decisions concerning the City’s multimodal transportation network. Correlated with the Land Use Element, the Mobility Element guides a safe and efficient transportation system that includes roadway, transit, bicycle, pedestrian, rail transport, and aviation. Recognizing the contribution of transportation to greenhouse gas emissions, the Mobility Element integrates with Climate Change and Sustainability policies.
4 884
M-2 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
This page is intentionally left blank.
885
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-3
Mobility Vision
The City of American Canyon is a community that embraces mobility through all transportation modes. The core value of the Mobility Element is to provide safe and easy travel for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders and motor vehicles correlated with the Land Use Element.
This community mobility value is based on enhancing the City’s " sense of place" with a strong emphasis on all forms of mobility safety and environmental protection. An efficient multi-modal plan will improve our sense of place, provide greater mobility choice for all residents, and help the environment. 886
M-4 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
Introduction
The Mobility Element provides a vision and guiding principles for the transportation system, and detailed goals and policies which implement a compete streets approach to mobility in the future.
Local transportation planning is a coordinated effort involving local and regional agencies. The goals and policies set forth in this document are intended to promote local planning, but also foster cooperation between jurisdictional partners such as the Napa Valley Transportation Authority (NVTA), the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans).
The transportation planning and policy in the Mobility Element includes a critical component of the City's responsibility towards supporting regional efforts to meet greenhouse gas reduction targets, through coordinating planning for land use, transportation, and housing. The Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Community Strategy (RTP/SCS) for the San Francisco Bay Area, Plan Bay Area 2050, was jointly produced and adopted by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) on October 21, 2021. Plan Bay Area 2050 is the strategic update to Plan 887
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-5
Bay Area 2040, and it connects the elements of housing, the economy, transportation, and the environment through 35 strategies that will make the Bay Area more equitable for all residents and more resilient in the face of unexpected challenges. It is a roadmap to help Bay Area cities and counties preserve the character of our diverse communities while adapting to the challenges of future population growth.
A portion of the Planning Area - the Broadway District (SR 29) corridor - has been designated by MTC and ABAG as a Priority Development Area (PDA), meaning that it is recognized as an area with substantial opportunity for infill development near transit. PDAs play a critical role in accommodating future growth in the regional agencies' SCS plans.
California Planning Requirements
Required General Plan Element. California law mandates a “Mobility Element” or “Circulation Element” that contains the “general location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, and other local public utilities and facilities, all correlated with the land use element” of the General Plan per Government Code Section 65302 (b).
Complete Streets Act. The term “complete streets” refers to a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets -- including bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, motorists, movers of commercial goods, pedestrians, public transportation, and seniors. A complete street is one that provides safe and convenient travel in a manner that is suitable to the local context. In 2012, the City adopted a Complete Streets Policy (Resolution 2012-72).
The Mobility Element is consistent with the California Complete Streets Act (AB 1358), which requires cities and counties incorporate “Complete Street” policies when updating their General Plan Mobility Element. Complete streets make travel safe for all users, including bicyclists, pedestrians, motorists, transit vehicles, and people of all ages and abilities. While every street does not need to provide dedicated space to all users, the street network must accommodate the needs of all users.
Economically, complete streets help lower transportation costs by enabling people to use transit, walking, or bicycling rather than driving to reach their destinations. Caltrans is actively engaged in implementing its complete streets policy in all planning, programming, design, construction, operations, and maintenance activities for the State Highway System.
888
M-6 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
Provision of safe mobility for all users contributes to the Caltrans’s vision:
"improving mobility across California.” The successful long-term implementation of this vision will provide more options for people to travel from one place to another, less traffic congestion, fewer greenhouse gas emissions, more walkable communities (with healthier, more active people), and fewer barriers for older adults, children, and people with disabilities.
Local Roadway Safety Plan. American Canyon is currently preparing a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP). Required for an agency to apply for federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding, the LRSP will proactively correct high collision or problem locations and prevent local road fatalities and injuries. The final plan will recommend proven countermeasures, provide a structure and realistic set of responses that implement changes over time, will integrate the “4 E’s” approach (Education, Enforcement, Emergency Service, and Engineering) in its proposed solution strategies, and identify road safety partners that could sustain a long-term effort.
Traffic Calming Program. The American Canyon “We ❤ Safe Streets” Traffic Calming Program provides a framework for the community to submit concerns of problem areas to our Traffic Calming Team for evaluation. The Program includes criteria to assess the magnitude of the need to modify a street or roadway, and probable effectiveness of a potential traffic calming measure installation.
Capital Improvement Programs. California Government Code Section 65401 specifies public works projects must conform to the General Plan. In practice, this requires the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) adoption include findings that the proposed City of American Canyon Five-Year CIP conforms with the General Plan, which includes the Mobility Element.
Vehicle Miles Traveled. The Mobility Element is consistent with Senate Bill (SB) 743 directing changes to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines that established Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the transportation metric analyzed under CEQA, effective July 1, 2020. Using VMT as the transpor889
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-7
tation CEQA metric is intended to emphasize statewide goals related to infill development, transit investments, promotion of public health through active transportation, and reduction of GHG emissions over local needs to manage traffic congestion on local road networks.
Transportation impact analysis under CEQA is no longer based on level of service (LOS), which focused on motor vehicle delay. The new CEQA standards require transportation impacts associated with development be assessed primarily on the effects of VMT.
While LOS is no longer related to CEQA, LOS-based performance goals remain relevant for non-CEQA planning purposes and as a tool for the City to ensure its roadway system meets the expectations of the community on criticallyimportant roadways. 890
M-8 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
Transportation Setting
The city of American Canyon is located in southern Napa County, about 35 miles northeast of San Francisco. Adjacent and south of the city limits is the city of Vallejo in Solano County. North of the city limits, the cities of Napa, , St. Helena, Calistoga, and the Town of Yountville are located along State Route 29 (SR 29) which is a main route to wine country destinations. As with American Canyon, these jurisdictions are bisected by SR 29.
American Canyon had an estimated population of 21,800 in 2020, an increase from 19,454 in 2010 and 9,774 in 2000. It is the second most populated city in the County after the city of Napa. With its recreational options, local wineries, and proximity to Napa Valley, Sonoma County, the East Bay, San Francisco, and easy access to Sacramento, American Canyon sees many different types of roadway users each day.
State Route 29 runs through the city mostly at-grade and serves as a main thoroughfare for local and pass-through traffic. In addition, American Canyon roadways serve a variety of users including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, passenger cars, and heavy trucks for freight, with a mix of local, recreational, and regional trips.
MOB-Figure 1 shows the existing mobility system map. Traffic to and from the I80 corridor is served by American Canyon Road and Jameson Canyon Road (SR 12). Access to and from Vallejo and the East Bay, including the Counties of Contra Costa and Alameda, is provided via Flosden Road and SR 29. To and from the north, access is provided via SR 29 and SR 12, which also collects traffic from the rest of Napa County. Marin and Sonoma counties to the west and northwest may also access the city using SR 29 via SR 37.
Rail transportation in the City is currently limited to freight service only. No commuter rail service exists in the city or county. The main rail line in the city is owned by Union Pacific Railroad Company and enters the city parallel to and on the east side of SR 29 at the Solano County line.
891
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-9
MOB-Figure 1: Existing Mobility System Map
892
M-10 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
Local Travel Trends
The U.S. Census Bureau provides data on the "journey to work" in its decennial census and American Community Survey databases. MOB-Figure 2 shows commuting patterns in and out of American Canyon. Of the 4,089 people employed in the American Canyon, 432 live in the city and 3,657 commute in from other areas. More than 9,000 American Canyon residents commute out of the city for work.
MOB-Figure 2: Employment Inflow-Outflow Travel Patterns (2017) American Canyon residents overwhelmingly commute to and from work by automobile, with nearly 79 percent driving to work alone and 14 percent carpooling in recent years as shown on CIR-Table 1. Only approximately 3 percent of residents commute to work by multimodal means, with 2.4 percent commuting by public transit, and less than 1 percent walking or bicycling to work.
MOB-Table 1: Means of Transportation to Work (Residents) 1990 2000 2010 2018
Single-Occupancy Vehicle 73.9% 73.3% 78.2% 78.5%
Carpool 21.4% 20.6% 13.7% 14.1%
Work from Home/Other 1.5% 3.3% 3.8% 2.9%
Public Transit 0.8% 1.5% 2.0% 2.4%
Motorcycle or Other 2.4% 0.2% 0.7% 1.3%
Source: US Census Bureau, 1990 and 2000 Summary files, and American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates for 2006- 2010 and 2014-2018.
893
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-11
As shown on CIR-Table 2: while the majority of American Canyon residents commute less than 25 miles to work, nearly 1,500 residents (15-percent) must travel more than 50 miles for work each day. American Canyon employed residents have heavy commute patterns south and north of the city, and the majority of these residents travel north to the city of Napa.
MOB-Table 2: Travel Time to Work (Residents)
Travel Number Percent
Less than 10 miles 2,977 30.1%
10 to 24 miles 3,514 35.5%
25 to 50 miles 1,920 19.4%
Greater than 50 miles 1,488 15.0%
Total 9,899 100.00%
Source: US Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies, LEHD On the Map.
During the five-year period between 2017 and 2021, there were two fatal and five severe injury collisions recorded for the roadways under the City of American Canyon’s jurisdiction. There were two fatal and 10 severe injury collisions on SR 29. MOB Figure -3 shows the locations of fatal and severe injuries.
Active Transportation
There are currently over 13 miles of bicycle network within American Canyon, including over 8 miles of Class I multiuse paths, 2.8 miles of Class II bike lanes, and over 2 miles of Class III designated bicycle routes on public roadways. While most of the city has sidewalks, given the rural character of many older neighborhoods and the lack of a centralized downtown area, several areas of the city have limited or lacking pedestrian infrastructure. There is minimal sidewalk coverage along SR 29, which serves as the main commercial corridor through the center of American Canyon. MOB-Figure 4 shows the locations of collisions involving bicyclists from 2017-21, which are concentrated on American Canyon Road. MOB-Figure 5 shows the locations of collisions involving pedestrians from 2017-21 which primarily occurred on SR 29 and American Canyon Road.
Public Transit Service
Public transportation within the city is provided by American Canyon Transit, which is a part of the Napa Valley Transportation Authority (NVTA) Vine Transit system. American Canyon Transit is a fixed route and on-demand, door-to-door, transit service within specific areas of the city. Vine’s Route 29 (Napa-BART) Express connects the BART Station in El Cerrito to the Redwood Park-n-Ride in the city of Napa and stops in American Canyon at the Post Office on Crawford Way.
894
M-12 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
MOB-Figure 3: Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations 2017-21 895
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-13
MOB-Figure 4:Bicycle Collision Locations 2017-21
896
M-14 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
MOB-Figure 5:Pedestrian Collision Locations 2017-21
897
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-15
Airport
The Napa County Airport is just northwest of the city limits in unincorporated territory. It is a General Aviation airport with charter flights available, but no scheduled commercial flights. The airport can accommodate most private aircraft including jets, up to 120,000 pounds. The airport was built by the United States Army Air Force in 1942 and was deeded to Napa County after World War II for civilian use. The nearest general passenger airports are in Oakland, San Francisco, and Sacramento.
Land use planning in the airport area is subject to the Napa Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan which was adopted by the Napa County Airport Land Use Commission in December 2024. In 2010, the Napa County Airport Land Use Commission deemed the American Canyon General Plan in conformance with the Napa Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (#P109-0002-ALUC).
Justification: Updates the status of the Napa County Airport Land Use Plan and the evolving capacity to accommodate aircraft.
Street System Plan
The planned street network will provide an efficient transportation system that includes a citywide network of complete streets. A commitment to providing complete streets is a key to effective transportation planning and will maximize the effectiveness of the existing street network.
Street Classifications
American Canyon consists of a network of complete streets. These streets play an integral role in connecting the city to other destinations in Napa County, the adjacent city of Vallejo, Solano County, and the San Francisco Bay Area. MOBFigure 6 shows the planned buildout street network based on the following classifications:
• Arterial Streets. Arterial facilities serve all travel modes and connect areas of major activity within the urban area. Arterials also distribute motor vehicle traffic from freeways/highways to collector streets.
Within the city, arterial streets provide four motor vehicle lanes with bicycle lanes and sidewalks, and maximum operating speeds currently ranging from 30 to 45 mph, including American Canyon Road, Flosden Road, and Newell Drive. State Route (SR) 29 is a Regional Arterial that 898
M-16 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
bisects the city and provides interregional access to the city of Vallejo in the south, and the rest of Napa County to the north. SR 29 serves a dual purpose of providing local cross-town circulation for all travel modes, as well as serving significant regional travel primarily by motor vehicle, including public transportation. The regional travel contains two components - regional "through" traffic that does not originate or terminate in the city, and regional-local "commute" traffic that originates in the city but terminates outside, or vice-versa. • Collectors. Collector streets serve all travel modes and function as connector routes between local and arterial streets and provide access to residential, commercial, and industrial property. Collector streets within the city typically provide two motor vehicle lanes (one per direction) with current maximum operating speeds of 30 mph and include Broadway Street, Eucalyptus Drive, Green Island Road, Rio Del Mar, and Donaldson Way, Commerce Boulevard, among others. • Local Streets. Local streets provide direct access for all travel modes to abutting properties and allow for localized movement of traffic. Local streets are characterized by low daily traffic volumes and current operating speeds of 25 to 30 mph.
MOB-Figure 6: Standard Roadway Cross Sections
SR 29 Corridor Planning
Broadway (SR 29) is a four-lane highway through American Canyon. Between Napa Junction Road and American Canyon Road, Broadway defines the City’s 899
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-17
character to our residents, business community, and thousands of drivers that pass through our City each day. Local planning efforts have resulted in the development of preliminary concepts for SR 29 that have been presented to the public through workshops for input and comment.
Planning for the State Route 29 (SR 29) corridor is an issue of significant importance not only for the city, but for the entire region. Both Solano County to the south and Napa County to the north rely on SR 29 for mobility-for work, school, shopping, and recreation.
As a State facility, Caltrans plays an important part in approving and funding improvements to SR 29. State funding for improvements is provided through Caltrans, and planning efforts require approval from Caltrans prior to implementation.
Currently, the Napa Valley Transportation Authority (NVTA) in partnership with the City, is preparing the American Canyon Multimodal Improvement Project.
This effort is considering two Options for improving Broadway between Napa Junction Road and American Canyon Road. Both Options contemplate landscape and pedestrian improvements, and multimodal features. Option 2 would maintain the existing 4-lane roadway configuration with roundabouts at major intersections.
900
M-18 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
MOB-Figure 7:American Canyon Multimodal Improvement Project Option 2 Newell Drive and South Kelly Road
Extensions
The Mobility Element street network includes extension of Newell Drive north from its current terminus concurrent with future development. MOB-Figure 8 shows the planned conceptual future alignment of Newell Drive. The precise alignment will be determined through future planning processes. As envisioned, Newell Drive would eventually connect American Canyon Road in the south with SR 29 at Green Island Road. In addition, South Kelly Road would extend south from North Kelly Road to a new connection with Newell Drive. The future extension roads would be a 2-lane collector with one motor vehicle lane in each direction, bicycle lanes and sidewalks.
Justification: The modified language clarifies that the future Newell Drive alignment will be known when precise engineering occurs.
West Side Connector
A West Side Connector (WSC) roadway has been part of the General Plan since its adoption in 1994. A “Circulation Element Advisory Committee” was appointed by the City Council to provide input on a revised “West Side Connector” road alignment. The Committee considered four roadway alignments. On June 15, 2021, the Committee recommended a new east-west roadway that would connect the northern edge of Commerce Court to the western terminus of Hess Road. This alignment is reflected on Figure 8: General Plan Mobility System Map.
901
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-19
Rio Del Mar East
The General Plan envisions extending Rio Del Mar east from its terminus at Highway 29. Within the new roadway segment, Rio Del Mar East will cross the Union Pacific Railroad line at-grade. When completed, Rio Del Mar East will connect Highway 29 on the west to Newell Drive on the east as a 2-lane arterial and serve as a cross-town east-west roadway arterial.
Vision Zero
The Mobility Element includes Vision Zero goals and policies. Vision Zero aims to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all. Traffic deaths and injuries can be reduced over time by prioritizing traffic safety as a public health issue. The City of American Canyon Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) identifies safety countermeasures to improve safety.
902
M-20 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
MOB-Figure 8:General Plan Mobility System Map
903
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-21
Bikeway Network Plan
American Canyon is ideally situated for bicycle and pedestrian mobility, with a generally flat topography, scenic landscapes in the Newell Open Space and Napa River Wetlands a short distance to the east, west, and north. Combined with the Napa Valley Vine Trail, the goal is to interconnect American Canyon as well as the surrounding communities in the County with a seamless bicycle network for recreational and commuter use. The plan includes proposed bicycle and pedestrian trails, as well as on-street bicycle facilities to complete the partial network already in place in the city and county.
Types of Bikeways
Four classes of bikeways are defined by Caltrans:
• Class I Multi Use Path. Typically known as bike paths, Class I facilities are multi-use facilities that provide a completely separated right-of-way for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with cross flows of motorized traffic minimized.
• Class II Bike Lane. Known as bike lanes, Class II facilities provide a striped and signed lane for one-way bicycle travel on each side of a street or highway. The minimum width for bike lanes ranges between four and five feet depending upon the edge of roadway conditions (curbs). Bike lanes are demarcated by a six-inch white stripe, signage and pavement legends.
904
M-22 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
• Class Ill Bike Route. Known as bike routes, Class Ill facilities provide signs for shared use with motor vehicles within the same travel lane on a street or highway. Bike routes may be enhanced with warning or guide signs and shared lane marking pavement stencils. While Class Ill routes do not provide measures of separation, they have an important function in providing continuity to the bikeway network.
• Class IV Separated Bikeway. A Class IV Bikeway is for the exclusive use of bicycles and includes a separation between the bikeway and adjacent vehicle traffic. The physical separation may include flexible posts, grade separation, inflexible physical barriers or on-street parking. Separated bikeways generally operate in the same direction as vehicle traffic on the same side of the roadway. However, two-way separation bikeways can also be used, usually in lower speed environments (35 miles per hour or less).
Currently, bikeway facilities separated from vehicular traffic in American Canyon include a network of recreational pathways located throughout the community in City parks and on the American Canyon Creek corridor, a north-south ClassI Multi-use Path along Flosden Road and Newell Drive, and a Bay Trail pathway on Wetlands Edge Road. Class II bike lanes are provided on ElliotDrive, Broadway Street, Benton Way, Donaldson Way,American Canyon Road, and Kimberly Drive. Connecting gaps in the planned trail network is a high priority for the City.
Bicycle Plan
The City adopted a Bicycle Plan in 2020 (Resolution 2020-11) which is incorporated into the General Plan as Appendix 4-1. The Bicycle Plan was prepared by the NVTA in accordance with the California Bicycle Transportation Act as part of the Napa Countywide Bicycle Plan. The plan was coordinated with Example of a Class IV Separated Bikeway
905
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-23
extensive public outreach and existing City and Regional Plans at the time of its adoption. The Bicycle Plan adoption was one of several City actions implementing SB 375, the Sustainable Communities Strategy Act. MOB-Figure 9 shows the Bikeway Plan map.
906
M-24 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
MOB-Figure 9:Bikeway Plan Map
907
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-25
Pedestrian Plan
The City adopted a Pedestrian Master Plan into the General Plan in 2017 (Resolution 2017-42) which is incorporated into the General Plan as Appendix 4-2. The Pedestiran Plan was prepared by the NVTA in accordance with the Caltrans Active Transportation Program (ATP) Guidelines, which outline statewide requirements for what should be included in active transportation plans. Together with the Bicycle Plan, the Pedestrian Plan creates an Active Transportation Plan that will position American Canyon to effectively compete for project funding. MOB-Figure 10 shows the Pedestrian Plan Priority Improvements map.
908
M-26 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
MOB-Figure 10:Pedestrian Plan Priority Improvements Map 909
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-27
Planned Street Network
Improvements
To provide complete streets and correlate existing and planned land uses within the city, mobility improvements will be needed. Major street improvement locations are summarized on CIRC-Table 3.
MOB-Table 3: Major Circulation Improvements
Street
From
(South or East)
To
(North or West)
Classification
State Route 29 Southern City
Limits
Northern City
Limits
See NVTA PID
Report
Newell Drive Rio Del Mar SR 29/Green
Island Road
2-Lane Major
Collector
S. Kelly Road Paoli Loop N. Kelly Road 2-Lane Major
Collector
Newell Drive Donaldson Way Rio Del Mar 4-Lane Arterial
Green Island Road Western Terminus Easter Terminus 3-Lane Arterial West Side Connector Commerce
Boulevard
Hess Drive 2-Lane Major
Collector
Eucalyptus Drive Theresa Avenue SR 29 2-Lane Major
Collector
Rio Del Mar or South Napa
Junction Road (includes
new at-grade railroad
crossing)
SR 29 Newell Drive 2-Lane Major
Collector
Napa Junction Road Western Terminus Theresa Avenue 2-Lane Minor Collector
Newell Drive Railroad
Overcrossing
South of Railroad North of
Railroad
2-Lane Arterial
Bridge
Structure
American Canyon Road
Pedestrian Crossing
East of SR 29 West of SR 29 Pedestrian
Grade
Separated
Crossing
Donaldson Way Pedestrian
Crossing
East of SR 29 West of SR 29 Pedestrian
Grade
910
M-28 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
Separated
Crossing
Napa Junction Road Pedestrian
Crossing
East of SR 29 West of SR 29 Pedestrian
Grade
Separated
Crossing
Source: City of American Canyon
Goals and Policies
Goal MOB-1:
Provide safe and convenient access throughout the community with a citywide network of complete streets that meet the needs of all users and reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT). (Source: New Goal)
Policies
MOB-1.1: Complete Streets. Maintain and update street standards that that serves not just automobile operations, but also multimodal movement and adjacent land uses, including pedestrians, motorists, bicyclists, and transit riders of all ages and abilities, in a form that is compatible with and
complementary to adjacent land uses, and promotes
connectivity between uses and areas. (Source: Existing Policies
1.7 and 1.19, modified)
MOB-1.2: Complete Street Standards. Review current arterial, collector, and local street standards and update as necessary to conform to best practice classification standards and NACTO complete streets guidelines. (Source: New Policy)
MOB-1.3: Street Design Standard Exceptions. Consider exceptions to adopted street standards by the City Engineer subject to substantial evidence included in an Engineering Design
Standard Exception application. (Source: Existing Policies 1.19 and 1.21, modified)
MOB-1.4: Development Review. Evaluate new development to ensure that the safety, comfort, and convenience of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users are given an equal or greater level of 911
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-29
consideration to motor vehicle operators. (Source: Existing Policy 1.19, modified)
Justification: Fostering greater mobility with pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users will further VMT and other health objectives in the General Plan.
MOB-1.5: Sidewalks. Require sidewalks on all arterial and collector streets. Where feasible, separate sidewalks from streets on arterials and collectors with landscaping including a tree canopy to create shade. (Source: Existing Policy 1.19, modified) MOB-1.6: Transportation Facility Construction and Modification. When constructing or modifying transportation facilities, strive to provide for the movement of vehicles, commercial trucks, alternative and low energy vehicles, transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians appropriate for the road classification and adjacent land use. (Source: Existing Policy 1.19, modified)
MOB-1.7: Promote Walking and Bicycling. Promote walking and bicycling for transportation, recreation, and improvement of public health and the environment. (Source: Existing Policy 2.1, modified)
Justification: The language change reflects environmental benefits from reducing reliance on automobiles.
MOB-1.8: Discourage SR 29 Traffic on City Streets. Design the city circulation system to discourage regional traffic from bypassing SR 29 and impacting City streets. (Source: Existing Policy 1.3, modified)
MOB-1.9: SR 29 Mobility. Work with regional partners, including Caltrans, NVTA, and other agencies to explore a complete streets
approach that will expand the travel capacity of SR 29 and establish a low-stress method for crossing for students walking and biking to school and other active transportation users (Source: Existing Policy 1.3, modified)
Justification: The language change reflects that a low-stress walking environment will further Complete Streets.
MOB-1.10: Circulation System Design. Provide and maintain a City circulation system that is correlated with planned land uses in 912
M-30 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
the city and surrounding areas in the. (Source: Existing Policy
1.4)
MOB-1.11: Reduce the Need to Drive. Implement land use policies designed to create a pattern of activity that makes it easy to shop, play, visit friends, and conduct personal business without driving. (Source: Existing Policy 2.4)
MOB-1.12: Neighborhood Context. Support safe, complete, and wellconnected neighborhood street, bicycle, and pedestrian access and connections that balance circulation needs with the neighborhood context. (Source: Existing Policy 1.5)
MOB-1.13: Multimodal Level of Service. Strive to achieve and maintain a Multimodal LOS D or better during peak hours recognizing that LOS D may not be achievable or cannot be maintained upon full buildout of the General Plan, due to traffic generated from sources beyond the control of the City. The following locations that may not achieve or maintain LOS D are as follows and therefore will be exempt from the LOS D policy: (1) Green Island Road; (2) Devlin Road; (3) American Canyon Road (4) Newell Drive; and (5) Flosden Road south of American Canyon Road. (Source: Existing Policy 1.6, modified)
MOB-1.14: Street Improvement Design. The street facility classifications indicated on the General Plan Circulation Map shall be the standard to which roads needing improvements are built to support the traffic generated by General Plan Land Use Element buildout, and therefore represent the buildout standards to which a street segment or intersection shall be improved. (Source: Existing Policy 1.8, modified)
MOB-1.15: Existing Facility Use. Make efficient use of existing transportation facilities and improve these facilities as necessary in accordance with the Circulation Map and NVTA Active Transportation Plan as it may be updated over time. (Source: Existing Policy 1.9)
Justification: The NVTA prepares plans that are adopted into the General Plan as standalone documents. The additional language acknowledges the contribution these documents
make to improve transportation efficiency.
913
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-31
MOB-1.16: Agency Coordination. Coordinate with State, Regional, County, and neighboring agencies to ensure highway improvements (i.e.: SR-12, SR-29, and SR-37) appropriately consider impacts to American Canyon. (Source: Existing Policy 1.10, modified) MOB-1.17: Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled. Through layout of land uses, improve alternate travel modes, provide more direct routes for all modes of travel, and strive to reduce total vehicle miles traveled by city and non-residents traveling to American Canyon to work or shop. (Source: Existing Policy 1.11, modified) Justification: Revised language focuses on priority to
accommodate all modes of travel.
MOB-1.18: Circulation System Enhancements. Achieve, maintain, and improve mobility in the city in accordance with the Circulation Map, support multimodal travel of all users and goods, explore creative circulation system enhancements that increase system capacity, and consider, where feasible, improvements in addition to those identified on the Circulation Map, where feasible and appropriate. (Source: Existing Policy 1.12, modified) MOB-1.19: Financing Program. Maintain a transportation financing program that will fund to the greatest extent feasible planned transportation network consistent with the General Plan, including Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) program funding consistent with AB 1600. (Source: Modified Existing Policy 1.13) MOB-1.20: Bicycle Plan Funding. Include funding for the City's Bicycle Plan updates and bikeway improvements consistent with the Bicycle Plan in the City's transportation financing program and TIF, recognizing the multi-modal travel needs of the City. (Source:
Existing Policy 2.11)
MOB-1.21: Address Mobility Needs. Recognize and meet the mobility needs of persons using wheelchairs and those with other mobility limitations. (Source: Existing Policy 2.2)
MOB-1.22: Non-motorized Circulation System. Provide safe, low stress, and direct pedestrian routes and bikeways between places. (Source: Existing Policy 2.3)
Justification: Revised language to highlight that low-stress networks are more enjoyable, and will be used more frequently. 914
M-32 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
MOB-1.23: Pedestrian Connections to Employment Destinations.
Encourage the development of a network of continuous
walkways within new commercial, town center, public, and industrial uses to improve workers' ability to walk safely around, to, and from their workplaces. Where possible, route
pedestrians to grade separated crossings over State Route 29. (Source: Existing Policy 2.18)
MOB-1.24: Bicycle Facilities. Bicycle facilities shall be provided to complete a continuous low stress bikeway system, consistent with state adopted bikeway standards, as shown on the current Bikeway Plan Map. In cases where existing right-of-way constraints limit development of Class II or Class IV facilities, Class Ill signage and demarcation may be permitted at the discretion of the City Engineer. Deviations from these adopted bikeway standards shall be permitted with the approval of the City Engineer. and Deviations from the routing shown on the adopted bikeway diagram shall be permitted with the approval of the City Engineer Council. (Source: Existing Policy 2.5, modified) Justification: The revised language addresses a greater range of possibilities in the future and better clarifies responsibility for technical approvals by the City Engineer and policy approvals by the City Council.
MOB-1.25: Street Trees. Ensure that street tree plans consider shade and comfort for pedestrians and bicyclists and traffic calming benefits. (Source: Existing Policy 2.6, modified)
MOB-1.26: Universal Design. Provide pedestrian facilities that are accessible to persons with disabilities and ensure that roadway improvement projects address accessibility by using universal design concepts such as bus pullouts and shelters, street lighting, and curbside management features such as
pickup/drop-off locations for shared ride/ transit network companies and spaces for delivery vehicles to park safely for short durations. (Source: Modified Existing Policy 2.7) MOB-1.27: Sustainable Roadway Expansion. Monitor the effects of roadway expansion on air, noise, seismic and archeological resources, and nesting habitat. (Source: New Policy).
915
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-33
MOB-1.28: Coordination with Adjacent Jurisdictions. Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions to ensure connected and consistent nonvehicular facilities, including bridges, grade-separate crossings, as appropriate. (Source: New Policy).
916
M-34 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
Goal MOB-2:
A safe transportation system that eliminates traffic-related fatalities and reduces non-fatal injury collisions. (Source: New Goal) Policies
MOB-2.1: Vision Zero. Strive for the elimination of all traffic fatalities and severe injuries while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all. (Source: New Policy)
MOB-2.2: Context Sensitive Design. Apply a context sensitive design lens to improve multimodal transportation safety by expanding the City’s non-motorized transportation infrastructure using context sensitive design. (Source: New Policy)
Justification: Improves focus on context sensitive design by moving the phrase to the beginning of the policy.
MOB-2.3: Bicycle Safety Facilities Maintenance. Increase the safety of those traveling by bicycle travel by sweeping debris from and repairing bicycle paths and lanes and repairing and restriping worn or damaged surface facilities. (Source: Existing Policy
2.14)
Justification: Emphasizes bicycle safety through facilities maintenance more holistically.
MOB-2.4: Improved Bikeway Visibility. Consistent with evolving best practices, upgrade existing bikeways using all means available, such as conflict markings, buffers, rumble strips, and
delineators. Use visual cues, such as brightly colored paint on bike lanes or a one-foot painted buffer strip, along bicycle routes to provide a visual signal to drivers to watch out for bicyclists. and Nurture a "share the lane" ethic, prioritizing bikeways with recent automobile-bicycle collisions and those that are routes to school. (Source: Existing Policy 2.16, modified) Justification: Further elaborates on the need to stay current with best practices to improve bicycle safety and visibility.
MOB-2.5: Speeds on Residential, Collector, and Arterial Streets. Explore innovative waysImplement the current Traffic Calming Program to 917
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-35
reduce vehicular speeds through residential neighborhoods with evidence-based best practices to posted speed limits, such as implementing traffic calming strategies such as: enhanced crosswalks, lighted crosswalks, speed cushions, reduced lane widths, and others. (Source: New Policy)
Justification: The revised wording emphasizes the need to consider best practice traffic calming measures.
MOB-2.6: Site Designs and Safety. Ensure, through the development review process, that development projects follow best design practices to reduce conflicts between multiple travel modes. (Source: New Policy)
MOB-2.7: Stakeholder Partners. Partner with public, nonprofit, and community stakeholders to secure dedicated funding for the education and infrastructure needs of the Countywide Safe Routes To School Partnership to provide safe and equitable access for students going by active transportation to local schools.
Justification: This new policy recognizes that stakeholder partners can elevate the City’s ability to achieve many goals by furthering active transportation.
MOB-2.8: Bicycle Friendly Community. Obtain resources to assist with improving bicycle facilities and education for people of all ages and abilities by securing and maintaining status as a Bicycle Friendly Community awarded by the National League of
American Bicyclists.
Justification: Tapping into the national League of American Bicyclists will provide resources and funding to further our bicycle system and local bicycle education and awareness.
Goal MOB-3:
Support safe evacuation routes in the event of an emergency. (Source: New Goal) Policies
MOB-3.1: Parallel North-South Roadway. Prioritize construction of roadways that provide alternate vehicle access parallel to 918
M-36 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
Highway 29 through American Canyon and coordinate
continuation of parallel routes outside the City with Regional Agencies. (Source: New Policy)
MOB-3.2: Evacuation Routes. Identify important roadways that would serve as evacuation routes in the event of an emergency. (Source: New Policy)
MOB-3.3: Natural Hazard Awareness Week. Coordinate with the American Canyon Fire Protection District to conduct outreach to the community on emergency evacuation routes in our
community. (Source: New Policy)
MOB-3.4: Evacuation Route Obstacles. Evaluate potential physical conditions that could impede an evaluation route. Examples include overhead utility poles, dead/ dying trees, aging infrastructure. (Source: New Policy)
Goal MOB-4:
Support mobility programs that reduce reliance on fossil fuel. (Source: New Goal) Policies
MOB-4.1: Transit Electrification. Support NVTA in its efforts to electrify the transit fleet. (Source: New Policy)
MOB-4.2: Municipal Fleet. Prepare a plan to systematically replace the City’s vehicle fleet to electric. (Source: New Policy)
MOB-4.3: Effects of New Technologies. Monitor and evaluate the development of convenient new electric mobility technologies (e.g., scootershare and bikeshare). (Source: New Policy).
MOB-4.4: Expand Electric Charging Stations. Evaluate regulatory and incentivized processes and funding mechanisms to streamline new electric vehicle charging stations at the lowest possible cost. (Source: New Policy).
919
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-37
Public Transportation
American Canyon has a variety of public transportation options including fixed route systems and demand-responsive systems as well as local systems and regional systems.
American Canyon Transit
American Canyon Transit (ACT) is a part of the Napa County Transit (VINE) family of services operated by the NVTA. ACT is a bus service that provides a 90-minute round trip route through the city on weekdays between 7:30 AM and 6:00 PM.
ACT provides one main route served by two buses, ACT-1 and ACT-2, as well as a Peak Service route during the morning. The ACT buses will deviate from routes and provide on-demand service as time permits for disabled and senior citizens.
Route ACT-1 Southbound starts at 6 am weekdays from the ACT bus stop on Main Street next to Wal-Mart. ACT-1 travels southbound via Rio Del Mar to Donaldson Way and continues (blue route on Figure 5) Route ACT-2 Northbound starts at 10 am weekdays from the ACT bus stop on James Street at Crawford Way. ACT-2 travels easterly via Donaldson Way to southbound Shenandoah and continues (blue route on Figure 6).
The AM Peak Service makes two loops in the AM. The first loop is from the WalMart bus stop at 7:25 am, and the second loop is from the Rio Del Mar/Eucalyptus intersection (7-Eleven) bus stop (green route on Figure 6). This route is designated as the "American Canyon High School" route, as depicted on the bus front signs.
VINE
VINE provides services outside the ACT routes between several cities in Napa County. Within the City, Route 10, and VINE 29 offer bus stops within the city limits. Route 10 (purple route on Figure 6) runs from Napa Valley College in the city of Napa to the city of Vallejo and stops at SR 29/Rio Del Mar and at the American Canyon Active Adults Center on Elliot Drive between Knightsbridge Way and Kimberly Drive.
VINE 29 (yellow route on Figure 6) is a commuter express route from Calistoga to El Cerrito Del Norte BART and the Ferry Terminal in Vallejo. Vine 29 stops at the American Canyon Post Office at SR 29/Crawford Way. Both of these routes are available throughout the week. VINE Go is also an available door-to-door dedicated service for qualifying disabled and senior citizens. 920
M-38 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
Goals and Policies
Goal MOB-5:
Support increased public transit to improve mobility, improve air quality, and support efforts to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT. (Source: New Goal) Policies
MOB-5.1: VMT Thresholds. Maintain and periodically reevaluate established vehicle miles traveled (VMT) thresholds and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) mitigation
requirements for the purposes of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Continue to maintain LOS standards for the purposes of planning and designing street improvements on Green Island Road, Devlin Road, and American Canyon Road. (Source: New Policy)
MOB-5.2: Existing Transportation Demand Management Efforts.
Continue to support the implementation of existing local and regional efforts to manage traffic demand, such as the Napa Logistics Park trip monitoring program, and employer TDM provisions of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAAQMD). (Source: New Policy)
MOB-5.3: Support Transit Operation Improvements. Work with NVTA to expand both ACT and VINE fixed route services, improve
operations, and support dedicated bus lanes and/or queuejump lanes on SR 29 to enhance bus operations by reducing travel time for transit vehicles. (Source: Existing Policies 3.2 and
3.3, modified)
MOB-5.4: Demand-Responsive Transit. Support NVTA’s demand responsive transit system. (Source: Existing Policy 3.4) MOB-5.5: Transit Stops. Work with NVTA to situate transit stops at locations that are convenient for transit users and promote increased transit ridership through the provision of shelters, benches, bike racks on buses, and other amenities. (Source:
Existing Policy 3.8)
921
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-39
MOB-5.6: Transit Service Funding. Encourage NVTA to continue to pursue Federal and State funds to subsidize capital and operating costs associated with transit operation in the city. (Source: Existing Policy 3.6, modified)
MOB-5.7: Future Transit Links. Consider orienting transit system expansion to link with other potential future commuter bus and/or rail services. (Source: Existing Policy 3.13, modified) MOB-5.8: Transit Services Marketing. Support NVTA efforts to encourage ridership on public transit systems through marketing and promotional efforts. Provide information to residents and employees on transit services available for local and regional trips. (Source: Existing Policy 3.9)
MOB-5.9: Support VINE Services. Continue to support the VINE service provided by NVTA. (Source: Existing Policy 3.14)
MOB-5.10: Transit Supportive Development. Ensure that new development is designed to make transit a viable transportation choice for residents, including neighborhood centers or focal points with sheltered bus stops; locating medium and highdensity development on or near streets served by transit wherever feasible; and link neighborhoods to bus stops by continuous sidewalks or pedestrian paths. (Source: Existing Policy 3.11)
MOB-5.11: Transit for Seniors. Require new community care facilities and senior housing projects with over 25 beds to provide accessible transportation services for the convenience of residents. (Source: Existing Policy 3.10)
MOB-5.12: SB 375 Implementation. Coordinate with other agencies to implement regional transit solutions as part of the SB 375 Sustainable Communities Strategy. (Source: Existing Policy 3.12) MOB-5.13: Park and Ride Facilities. Continue to encourage additional regional public transportation services and support facilities, such as park and ride lots near Broadway (SR-29). (Source: New Policy)
MOB-5.14: Effects of New Technologies on Transit Use. Monitor and evaluate the development of new mobility technologies (such as rideshare, microtransit, and potentially commuter rail 922
M-40 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
transit) and the potential effects on transit demand and the way users access public transit. (Source: New Policy)
Goods Movement
Truck Routes
Truck routes are intended to carry heavyweight commercial, industrial, and agricultural vehicles through and around the community with minimum disruption to local auto traffic and minimum annoyance to residential areas. Due to the high level of existing and expected future light industrial activity in the northwest quadrant of the City, truck routes should be clearly designated so that intrusion of heavy vehicle traffic into residential areas can be avoided.
Green Island Road, and SR 29 are the City's designated truck routes. Currently, SR 29 carries significant truck traffic and is designated as a Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA) terminal access route. The 1982 Surface Transportation Assistance Act set standards for large trucks, known as STAA trucks, and set minimum truck sizes that states allow on the National Network including the Interstate System and other defined routes, such as SR 29.
Rail Transport
Rail transportation in the American Canyon is limited to freight service only. The main rail line is owned by Union Pacific Railroad Company and enters the city from the City of Vallejo parallel to and on the east side of SR 29.
The rail line continues on this trajectory diverting from the SR 29 alignment north of American Canyon Road. North of Napa Junction Road, the railroad line splits into three segments:
• One segment heads northeast parallel to Jameson Canyon Road towards the city of Fairfield.
• Another segment heads northwest under SR 29 and across Green Island Road toward the city of Sonoma.
• The third leg heads north past Napa County Airport, terminating just north of Kennedy Park in the city of Napa. This leg connectsto the Napa Valley Wine Train.
923
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-41
The Napa Valley Railroad operates a tourist-oriented passenger train service between the City of Napa and St. Helena. The Wine Train makes multiple round trips per day between the two cities.
In 2003, the NVTA studied potential passenger rail service from the Vallejo Ferry Terminal north to St. Helena or Calistoga. The Napa/Solano Passenger/Freight Rail Study concluded that passenger rail service could be feasible. However, the service would require a significant subsidy with no current funding source.
In 2019, Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) completed a Passenger Rail Service Feasibility Study for a 41-mile Novato to Suisun City corridor. This study determined that this corridor is feasible for passenger rail including a potential rail station in American Canyon.
Goals and Policies
Goal MOB-6:
Efficient and safe transport of goods by truck and rail. (Source: New Goal) Policies
MOB-6.1: Promote Safe and Efficient Goods Movement. Promote the safe and efficient movement of goods via truck and rail with minimum disruptions to residential areas. (Source: Existing Policy 4.1)
MOB-6.2: Promote Railroad Safety. Maintain safe railroad crossings by coordinating road improvements at rail crossings with the California Public Utilities Commission. (Source: Modified Existing Policy 4.2)
MOB-6.3: Passenger Rail Service. Encourage regional transit agencies to evaluate passenger rail service with a station in American Canyon. (Source: New Policy)
MOB-6.4: Location of Industrial Development. Continue industrial expansion in the north industrial area to minimize the
neighborhood impacts of truck movements. (Source: Existing Policy 4.6)
924
M-42 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
MOB-6.5: Secure Truck Parking. Encourage high-security off-street parking for tractor-trailer rigs in industrial designated areas. (Source: Existing Policy 4.7)
MOB-6.6: Goods Movement Along City Arterials. Continue to restrict truck traffic through the City to its arterial roadways in order to facilitate goods movement to regional facilities; continue to prohibit truck traffic on residential streets. (Source: Modified Policy 4.4)
MOB-6.7: Truck Route Signage. Ensure that clear signage is provided from regional gateways to truck routes in the City. (Source: Existing Policy 4.3, modified)
MOB-6.8: Truck Route Design. Incorporate provisions for trucks in the design of Industrial Collector streets and other designated truck routes. Ensure that truck routes are designed according to California and where appropriate STAA standards for
intersections and turning movements. (Source: Existing Policy
4.5)
MOB-6.9: Effects ofNew Technologies onGoods Movement. Monitor and evaluate the development of new technologies and trends (such as e-commerce) and the potential effects on the goods movement network (including increased curbside loading
demand). (Source: New Policy)
Goal MOB-7:
Improve the mobility system with fiscally-sound financing methods. (Source: New Goal)
Policies
MOB-7.1: Funding Sources. Leverage existing available funding methods and sources to fund the transportation system in American Canyon while also researching innovative funding sources at the federal, state, regional, and county levels. (Source: New Policy) MOB-7.2: New Development. Ensure new development projects contribute their fair share to transportation network
925
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025 | M-43
improvements and that existing funding commitments are met. (Source: New Policy)
MOB-7.3: Monitor Funding. Monitor fee programs and regular funding mechanisms to ensure adequate funding for programmed
transportation improvements. (Source: New Policy)
MOB-7.4: Regional Funding. Maintain standards to qualify for regional transportation revenues and engage regional agencies to provide adequate transportation funding to local jurisdictions. (Source: New Policy)
926
M-44 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
Implementation Programs
Programs
Implements
Which
Policy(ies)
Responsible
Supporting
Department(s)
2023
– 2025
2026
– 2030
2031
– 2040
Annual
Ongoing
A Capital Improvement Program
Update the Capital Improvement Program
annaually to incorporate necessary circulation
system improvements. (Source: Existing Policy
1.19)
MOB-1.1
MOB -1.2
MOB -1.7
MOB -1.8
MOB -1.9
MOB -1.13
MOB -1.18
MOB -1.19
Public Works
City Manager
◼
B Update Street Standards. Update the City’s
street standards based on the complete streets
guidelines published by the National
Association of City Transportation Officials
(NACTO). (Source: New Program)
MOB -1.1
MOB -1.2
Public Works
◼
C Active Transportation Plan. Prepare and
update every five years an Active
Transportation Plan to replace the Bicyle
Master Plan and include pedestrian faclities.
The Plan should include a full range of facilities
for bicycle travel, including Class I bike/multiuse
paths, Class II bike lanes, Class Ill bike routes,
and Class IV separated bikeway to provide a
continuous system of bikeways trhoughout the
city. (Source: New Program that includes
Existing Policy 2.5, modified)
MOB -1.6
MOB -1.19
MOB -1.22
MOB -1.23
Public Works
◼ ◼ ◼
D Update Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA)
Guidelines. Update and adopt Transportation
Impact Analysis (TIA) guidelines to include VMT
and a Multimodal LOS assessment methodology
for the evaluation of potential transportation
impacts resulting from new development.
(Source: Existing Policy 1.26)
MOB -1.2
MOB -1.3
Pbulic Works
◼
E Transportation Impact Fee. Maintain and
update the transportation impact fee (TIF)
program consistent with AB 1600. (Source:
Existing Policy 1.13, modified)
MOB -1.18 Public Works
◼
F Active Transportation Funding. Annually
allocate TIF funds for the Active Transportation
Plan updates and bikeway design and
improvements consistent with the Active
Transportation Plan implementation program.
(Source: Existing Policies 2.8 and 2.11, modified)
MOB -1.18
MOB -1.19
Public Works ◼
927
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025| M-45
Programs
Implements
Which
Policy(ies)
Responsible
Supporting
Department(s)
2023
– 2025
2026
– 2030
2031
– 2040
Annual
Ongoing
G Bicycle use by City employees. Establish a
program to encourage bicycle use among City
employees. (Source: Existing Policy 2.11)
MOB -1.6 Public Works
◼
H Bicyle Facility Development and Maintenance.
Prepare and update every five years a bike
facility development and maintenance program
that includes the following provisions:
• signage consistent with according to
Caltrans or City standards
• lighting where needed;
• bicycle paths and lanes on bridges and
overpasses;
• bicycle-safe drainage grates;
• bikeways free of hazards such as
uneven pavement or gravel;
• merging or crossing signage where bike
routes and paths make transitions into
or across roadways;
• promoting classes on bicycle safety in
the schools in coordination with the
Napa Valley Unified School District;
and
• sweeping debris from and repairing
bicycle paths and lanes. (Source:
Existing Policy 2.14, modified)
MOB -1.12
MOB -1.17
MOB -1.19
MOB -2.3
MOB -2.4
Public Works
◼
I Parking and Congestion Pricing. Prepare a
study to evaluate the feasibility of
implementing parking and/or congestion
pricing, working with Caltrans as appropriate
when considering congestion pricing strategies
for SR 29. (Source: Existing Policy 5.1, modified)
Justification: This measure is not tied to a
policy.
N/A Public Works
◼
928
M-46 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
Programs
Implements
Which
Policy(ies)
Responsible
Supporting
Department(s)
2023
– 2025
2026
– 2030
2031
– 2040
Annual
Ongoing
J Pedestrian Crosswalk Installation. Install clearly
marked crosswalks at intersections near all
commercial uses, as well as clearly marked
pedestrian paths within parking areas. While
mid-block crossings are discouraged, if
conditions warrant and are approved by City
Engineer, crosswalks and signage indicating
pedestrian activity should be installed at midblock entrances where existing commercial uses are adjacent to other high-intensity uses, such
as parks and schools where necessary for
safety. Where possible, pedestrians should be
roiuted to grade separated crossings over State
Route 29. (Source: Existing Policy 2.17,
modified)
MOB -1.6
MOB -1.22
Public Works
◼
K Pedestrian Connections to Schools. Continue
developing the existing network of walkways
between schools and residential uses, and
encourage the development of new continuous
walkways between schools and residential uses.
Where possible, route pedestrians to grade
separated crossings over State Route 29.
(Source: Existing Policy 2.19)
MOB -1.6
MOB -1.21
Public Works ◼
L Vision Zero. Prepare and update every five
years a Vision Zero program and install safety
countermeasures consistent with the results
and recommendations of the Local Roadway
Safeway Plan (LRSP). (Source: New Program)
MOB -2.1
MOB -2.2
MOB -2.2
MOB -2.4
Public Works
◼
M Truck Facilities Financing. Prepare an analysis
of possible funding sources, including user fees,
to help finance truck routes and truck parking
areas. (Source: Existing Policy 4.8, modified)
MOB -4-1
MOB -4.2
MOB -4-3
MOB -4.4
Public Works
◼
N Railroad Crossing Safety Program. Continue the
ongoing comprehensive program to improve
the condition and safety of existing railroad
crossings by upgrading surface conditions and
installing signs and signals where warranted.
Participate in railroad safety education, such as
Operation Lifesaver activities when offered.
(Source: Existing Policy 4.9)
MOB -4-1
MOB -4.2
Public Works
◼
929
4. MOBILITY
Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025| M-47
Programs
Implements
Which
Policy(ies)
Responsible
Supporting
Department(s)
2023
– 2025
2026
– 2030
2031
– 2040
Annual
Ongoing
O New Railroad Crossings. Provide new crossings
across the railroad (UPRR) in conjunction with
the planned roadway improvements shown on
the Circulation System map to ensure at least
one cross-town route is maintained in case rail
activity interrupts local and regional traffic flow
and/or emergency access. New crossings will be
at Newell Drive (grade separated); and Rio Del
Mar or South Napa Junction Road (initially atgrade, may be grade separated in the future). (Source: Existing Policy 4.10, modified)
MOB -4-1
MOB -4.2
Public Works
◼
930
M-48 | Public Review Draft Mobility Element | May 2025
This page is intentionally left blank.
931
5. UTILITIES
Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 | U-1
Utilities
The quality, capacities, and capabilities of the public facilities, utilities, and infrastructure enhances community livability and economic potential. This Element focuses on policies to improve and maintain public facilities, utilities, and infrastructure that sustain households, businesses, and future population and employment growth. 5 932
U-2 | Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025
This page is intentionally left blank.
933
5. UTILITIES
Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 | U-3
Water Infrastructure and
Supply
A reliable source of water sustains our population, economy, and ensures long term growth. This section focuses on American Canyon’s existing potable water system, including water sources, treatment capabilities, and conservation practices.
Water/Wastewater Service Area
At the time of City incorporation in 1992, the City acquired the water and wastewater services provided by the American Canyon County Water District.
As a subsidiary agency, the water system is owned and operated by the City and governed by a five-member City Council.
• The City’s water service area is approximately 30 square miles (see Figure 3-1) and comprises of the following areas:
• The City itself, which is approximately 6 square miles and includes residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural users; • The commercial/industrial areas in and around the Napa County Airport located north of the City (unincorporated Napa County), which covers approximately 5 square miles; and
• The largely open space/agricultural areas to the west, east and north of the City limits (unincorporated Napa County), which include agricultural users and a small number of single-family residential customers who represent “legacy” accounts that were originally connected and served by the American Canyon County Water District.
A graphic depicting the historical water service area is shown on the figure below.
934
U-4 | Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025
U-Figure 1: American Canyon Water Service Area
935
5. UTILITIES
Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 | U-5
Water Supply
The City’s water supply primarily comes from the State Water Project. The State Water Project is designed, constructed, operated, and maintained by the California department of Water Resources and supplies water for 25 million Californians.
Lake Oroville is the largest State Water Project reservoir, one of 21 reservoirs that collects water for distribution. The water travels to American Canyon through several miles of the North Bay Aqueduct (NBA) and is delivered to tanks near the Jameson Canyon Road water treatment plant.
The City also receives supplemental water purchased from the Cities of Napa and Vallejo.
In 2017, the City became a partner in the Sites Reservoir Project, an environmentally beneficial, off-river reservoir that will capture excess water from major storms and save it for drier periods. This Project will help California’s farms, businesses, and cities continue to supply reliable water when other sources are low.
The City also produces and delivers recycled water to meet demand to private customers for agriculture, industrial, toilet flushing in apartment and commercial uses, and landscape irrigation.
According to the draft 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, the City anticipates it can meet water demands through the planning horizon year of 2045.
Potable Water Treatment
Raw water received through the North Bay Aqueduct system must be treated before potable use. American Canyon owns and operates a water treatment plant located at 250 Kirkland Ranch Road. The plant uses two processes to treat water, a conventional sedimentation and filtration process and a membrane filtration process. In total, the plant produces up to 5.5 million gallons of potable water each day within the water service area across 5,621 connections. The plant consistently meets the highest quality standards set forth by State and Federal regulations.
936
U-6 | Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025
Water Conservation
Climate change is causing higher average temperatures, a decrease in precipitation, and longer and more frequent heat waves and droughts. These climatic conditions overall increase water demand. A key component to water reliability and adaptation to climate change is conservation. The City’s Zero Water Footprint directs that conservation offset new potable water demand.
These and other measures will be implemented to ensure adequate water supply and responsible water usage. The following are some of the water conservation programs the City is implementing to further conservation efforts.
Water Conservation Ordinances
American Canyon has adopted three ordinances to help further its conservation efforts. The first aims to reduce the amount of wasted water and the second and third require new developments to use water efficient landscaping techniques.
Water Metering
All potable and recycled water customers are metered and billed on a monthly basis. City staff reads meters on a monthly basis, utilizing meter reading to both document demand reductions from conservation and high-water use.
Conservation Pricing
American Canyon uses a tiered rate structure method to encourage water conservation. The tiered rate structure incentivizes conservation by reducing rates for low water users, while progressively increasing the cost per gallon for high water users. Since 2007, American Canyon has applied tiered water rates to all single-family residential users.
Public Education and Outreach
American Canyon is actively involved in water conservation through public outreach and education. City programs include distributing free water saving devices (i.e., shower heads, faucet aerators, shower timers), rebates for high efficiency toilets and clothes washing machines, public outreach through the City website, and the “Cash for Grass” program, which pays homeowners to replace turf with water efficient landscaping.
937
5. UTILITIES
Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 | U-7
Goals and Policies
Goal U-1: Water Reliability
Establish and maintain a secure water supply and treatment, distribution, and storage system to serve the land uses proposed under the general plan. (Source:
Existing General Plan, Goal 5, modified)
Policies
U-1.1: Supplemental Surface Water. Support efforts to increase water supply from a variety of sources, such as participation in the Sites Reservoir programs with other NBA users to obtain supplemental surface water through a water transfer from another area, investment in the Sites Reservoir, local rainwater capture, and other feasible sources. (Source: General Plan, Policy 5.2.2 modified)
U-1.2: Facility Upgrades. Require construction of upgraded and expanded, distribution, storage, and treatment facilities to support existing and new development. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.7.1, modified)
U-1.3: Upgrade Responsibilities. Ensure that improvements to the existing water supply, distribution, storage, and treatment facilities are borne by project proponent in proportion to benefit; either through the payment of fees, or by the actual construction of the improvements. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 5.8, Policy 5.8.1, modified)
U-1.4: Urban Water Management Plan. Prepare a framework for longterm water planning consistent with the State Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMP Act), by preparing and
adopting an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) once
every five years. (Source: New Policy)
U-1.5: Adequate Supply Prior to Occupancy. Implement a Will Serve Process to ensure adequate water supply, distribution, storage, and treatment facilities is available to serve a project prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.7.1 modified)
938
U-8 | Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025
U-1.6: Water Service Priority. Consistent with State Law, in times of constrained water service expansion capacity, prioritize affordable housing developments as defined in California Government Code 65589.7 or any successor statute. The
second priority is provided to water connections and services to residences and businesses located within the city corporate boundaries. (Source: New Policy, ACMC Section 13.10.020) U-1.7: Extraterritorial Water Service Customers. Ensure existing water service customers located outside the City limits pay
appropriate water rates consistent with Hansen v. City of San Buenaventura (1986) 42 Cal.3d 1172 or latest legal precedent. (Source: New Policy)
Goal U-2: Water Conservation
Establish policies that make the most efficient use of our water resources for a variety of public benefits, such as: improve water reliability, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and minimize environmental impacts from drawing water from the environment. (Source New Goal)
Policies
U-2.1: Zero Water Footprint. Ensure new development offsets potable water demand by funding or constructing potable water
conservation efforts elsewhere in the water delivery system. (Source: New Policy)
U-2.2: City Facilities Retrofits. Improve water use efficiency at City facilities through retrofits, recycled water usage, and employee education. (Source: New Policy)
U-2.3: Retrofits Existing Buildings. Promote existing buildings upgrades to support water conservation by encouraging owners of residential, commercial, and industrial properties to replace inefficient plumbing fixtures, install drought-tolerant and waterwise landscaping, and harvest rainwater for landscaping and other household uses. (Source: New Policy)
U-2.4: Conservation Applications. Promote the use of water-saving plumbing fixtures and water-saving landscaping in existing 939
5. UTILITIES
Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 | U-9
development throughout the water service district. (Source:
Existing General Plan, Policy 5.4.1)
U-2.5: Recycled Water Use. Subject to State regulations and organizational capacity, consider new ways that recycled water can replace potable water. (Source: New Policy)
U-2.6: Recycled Water Distribution System. Conserve potable water by expanding the availability of recycled water (i.e., purple pipes) throughout the city. (Source: New Policy)
Wastewater
Wastewater collection and treatment is essential. American Canyon ensures wastewater is properly handled and reused for beneficial purposes. This section provides an overview of the City’s wastewater collection and treatment systems.
Infrastructure and Collection
Wastewater collection and treatment services are provided by the City’s Maintenance and Utilities Department. The Sewer Collection responds to reports of sewer spills and back-ups and monitors environmental compliance and water quality regulations. The City’s sewer infrastructure consists of 53 miles of gravity pipelines, five pump stations, five miles of sewer force mains, and the American Canyon Water Reclamation Facility (WRF). This infrastructure collects and treats wastewater from both domestic and industrial customers.
The City has plans to further develop this infrastructure to address population growth.
Treatment
The American Canyon Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) treats domestic and industrial wastewater flows from the city. The treatment plant discharges treated wastewater it to the Napa River, via wetlands ponds, or to the City’s recycled water distribution system. The WRF was designed to treat an average flow of 2.5 million gallon per day (mgd) and has a wet weather capacity of 5.0 mgd. Average treatments flows in 2018 ranged from 1.54 to 1.62 mgd, which is well below the facility treatment capacity.
940
U-10 | Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 Recycled Water
American Canyon supplements its water supply with recycled water. (Source:
American Canyon StoryMaps) The City adopted a Recycled Water Implementation Plan in 2005, and has been working to expand its recycled water system in order to further reduce the City’s reliance on imported water supply.
The City’s Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) has the ability to produce recycled water that meets the Title 22 standards for disinfected tertiary water, which is suitable for a wide range of uses such as landscape irrigation in residential and commercial areas, school yards, parks and playgrounds. Title 22 (California Code of Regulations, Division 4, Chapter 3, §60301 et seq.) is the regulation that establishes the level of treatment, water quality standards and the types of uses for recycled water for the purpose of protecting public health.
Napa Sanitation District (NSD) also provides wastewater collection/treatment and recycled water services for northern portions of the City’s potable water service area. In addition, some users in the northern part of the City’s water service area receive recycled water from Napa Sanitation District (NSD).
NSD provides wastewater collection/treatment and recycled water services for the City of Napa and portions of unincorporated Napa County. In 2015, NSD provided approximately 210 acre-feet of recycled water for landscape and agricultural irrigation to customers located within the City of American Canyon’s potable water service area. NSD is also planning to expand its recycled water distribution, including to agricultural and commercial landscape irrigation users within the City’s potable water service area.
American Canyon operates a Residential Recycled Water Fill Station open to residents on a drop-in basis. The station is located at the former Corporation Yard, 205 Wetlands Edge Road. After a brief training on the applicable uses for the water, residents are provided up to 300 gallons free of charge. Recycled water taps are purple to easily distinguish them from standard potable water pipes.
This is an example of recycled water and
purple piper infrastructure.
941
5. UTILITIES
Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 | U-11 Goals and Policies
Goal U-3: Wastewater Treatment Capacity
Establish and maintain adequate planning, construction, maintenance, and funding for wastewater collection and treatment facilities to support land uses; upgrading existing deficient systems, and expanding, where necessary, in the City's service area. (Source: Existing General Plan, Goal 5E, modified) Policies
U-3.1: Demand Requirements for Facilities. Through the Capital Improvement Plan process, ensure wastewater collection and treatment facilities are installed, maintained, and upgraded in a timely manner to meet usage requirements and maximize cost efficiency. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 5.15, Policy
5.14.2, and Policy 5.14.3 modified)
U-3.2: Capacity Demand. Require all new development to evaluate sewer capacity demand during the discretionary review
process. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.14.5 modified) U-3.3: Fiscal Obligations. Ensure wastewater infrastructure impact fees reflect the proportional increase in demand from new development. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 5.16, Policy 5.16.1, modified)
U-3.4: Alternatives Sustainable Approaches. Consistent with best practices, evaluate environmentally and economically efficient wastewater treatment systems, such as the artificial marshland wastewater treatment system. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.14.8, modified)
U-3.5: Wastewater Service Priority. Consistent with State Law, in times of constrained wastewater service expansion capacity, prioritize affordable housing developments as defined in California Government Code 65589.7 or any successor statute.
The second priority is provided to sewer connections and services to residences and businesses located within the city corporate boundaries. (Source: New Policy ACMC Section
13.10.020)
942
U-12 | Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 Flood Control and Storm Drainage
Stormwater is rainwater that does not quickly soak into the ground. Stormwater flows from rooftops, over impervious paved areas, and through lawns and fields.
As it flows, runoff collects into streams and rivers that transport soil, pesticides, fertilizer, oil and grease, leaves, litter, and other potential pollutants into local waterbodies. Due to its geographical location near sensitive watersheds, American Canyon plays a vital role in collecting stormwater runoff and preventing pollution that could be distributed in the surrounding sensitive environments.
Stormwater Infrastructure
The City of American Canyon Maintenance and Utilities Department oversees municipal storm drainage facilities within the city limits. The City’s storm drainage system collects stormwater runoff and discharges the water to the Napa River through a system of on-street storm drain inlets, ditches, detention basins, ponds, and bio-swales designed to increase groundwater infiltration and reduce sediment and pollutants.
Flooding and Flood Control
Seasonal flooding along the Napa River Watershed is a regular occurrence. In fact, there have been at least 22 serious floods on the river since 1865. During heavy rain, low-lying areas of American Canyon are subject to flooding along natural creeks and low-lying areas around the city.
According to the San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission (BCDC), sea level rise from global warming has risen water levels in San Francisco Bay nearly eight inches over the past century, and the rate of sea level rise is accelerating. Since 2008, the BCDC has served as the State agency responsible for leading the Bay Area’s preparedness for, and resilience to, rising sea level, tides, and storm surge due to climate change.
Rising sea levels (SLR) will have widespread impacts on the Bay Area. Adapting to this hazard will cost billions of dollars over the next several decades. 943
5. UTILITIES
Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 | U-13 Goals and Policies
Goal U-4: Flood Control
Establish and maintain adequate planning, construction, maintenance, and funding for storm drain and flood control facilities to support permitted land uses and preserve public safety. (Source: Existing General Plan, Goal 5C, modified) Policies
U-4.1: Storm Drainage Maintenance. Maintain existing public storm drains and flood control facilities and construct upgraded and expanded storm drain and flood control facilities, where necessary, to protect existing and accommodate new permitted development. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.10.1 modified)
U-4.2: Maximize Pervious Surfaces. Consistent with engineering standards, minimize storm water runoff from new development with pervious surface materials (grass, ground cover, and other). (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.10.18 modified) U-4.3: Financial Obligations. Ensure new storm drain and flood control facility costs are borne by the project proponent in proportion to benefit; either through the payment of fees, or by
constructing new improvements. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 5.11, Policy 5.11.1, modified)
U-4.4: National Flood Insurance Program. Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program. To this end, the City shall ensure that local regulations are in full compliance with standards adopted by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA). (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.10.8) U-4.5: Agency Coordination. Coordinate with the Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and other regional agencies and non-profit groups to maintain and improve levees and drainage channels. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy
5.10.14, modified)
944
U-14 | Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 U-4.6: Flood Control Channel Maintenance. Ensure clearance of flood control channels routinely of vegetation and debris which could impede stormwater flows, while protecting significant riparian vegetation. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.10.13) U-4.7: Integrity of Levees. Discourage uses that promote the erosion or structural deterioration of levees. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.10.16)
U-4.8: Low Impact Development. Require new developments to install green infrastructure consistent with the best
management practices of the State and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, including but not limited to pervious pavement, infiltration basins, raingardens, green roofs, rainwater harvesting systems, and other types of low impact development (LID). (Source: New Policy)
U-4.9: Floodwater Diversions. Implement engineering standards that prevent new development from increasing historical
stormwater flows onto neighboring properties. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.10.12 modified)
U-4.10: Development in Floodplains. Ensure the City’s Floodplain Ordinance is maintained with current standards and new
development is designed consistent the Floodplain Ordinance. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.10.9 and 5.10.10 modified)
Goal U-5: Stormwater Quality
Maintain the quality of surface and subsurface water resources within the City of American Canyon and its Planning Area. (Source: Existing General Plan, Goal 5D, modified)
U-5.1: Passive Treatment Systems. Consistent with engineering standards and water quality regulations, reduce pollutant loading through passive treatment systems such as vegetated filter strips, grass swales, and infiltration/sedimentation areas in suitable open space areas and incorporated into landscaping adjacent to parking lots and streets. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.12.1, modified)
This is an example passive treatment
system.
945
5. UTILITIES
Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 | U-15 U-5.2: Water Detention Facilities. Consistent with engineering standards and water quality regulations, require new and existing development to include drainage detention facilities that enhance the quality of water discharges from the facility. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.13.2 modified) U-5.3: Impervious Area Water Treatment. Implement engineering standards in new development that require stormwater
treatment from impervious areas. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 5.13, modified)
U-5.4: Storm Water Permitting. Require industrial operations to obtain coverage under the State Storm Water Permit For
Industrial Activities, and comply with provisions of the Permit, through notification and educational activities. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.13.2 modified)
Goal U-6: Climate ChangeAdaptation
Anticipate existing and future stormwater impacts of sea level rise and climatechange induced storm events. (Source: New Goal) U-6.1: Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment. Use the best available science to forecast areas in the City that are vulnerable to climate change-induced flooding. (Source: New Policy) Critical Infrastructure Adaptation. Plan for and construct sea level rise protection for American Canyon Critical Infrastructure such as Public Works Yard the former Corporation Yard at 205 Wetlands Edge Road, Wastewater Treatment Plant, and Pump Station. (Source: New Policy – NCHMP Mitigation AC-04.2020) Justification: The Corporation Yard was moved to 300 Napa Junction Road.
U-6.2: Floodplain Management. Evaluate the cumulative increase in offsite flooding potential impacts caused by new development projects that remove property from the 100-year floodplain. (Source: New Policy)
946
U-16 | Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 Solid Waste Disposal and Recycling
Waste collection and management is important to protect the environment and health of the population. Proper collection and disposal of waste is a large task that involves logistical planning and scientific understanding to balance environmental impacts and cost effectiveness. This section describes American Canyons current sold waste collection and disposal efforts.
Collection
Solid Waste collection is provided by Recology American Canyon under the Napa-Vallejo Waste Management Authority (NVWMA). NVWMA contracts collection, hauling, and disposal of solid waste from the cities of Napa, Vallejo, and unincorporated areas in southern Napa County. Recology provides residents with regular garbage, recycling, and green waste/compost pickup. Waste collected from American Canyon is sorted at the Devlin Road Recycling and Transfer Facility, located at 889 Devlin Road in American Canyon before it is sent to nearby landfills.
Disposal
Solid waste from American Canyon is directed to the Solano County Potrero Hills Landfill, located at 3675 Potrero Hills Lane, Suisun City. The Potrero Hills Landfill is a Class III landfill that accepts a variety of waste types, including mixed municipal, construction/demolition waste, agricultural, sludge (biosolids), industrial, and other designated wastes.
As of 2014, Potrero Hills Landfill accepted 97 percent of the City’s total solid waste (i.e.: 12,896 tons). The Potrero Hills Landfill is expected to be in operation until 2048 with a remaining capacity of approximately 13 million cubic yards with up to 4,330 tons of waste per day.
On November 16, 2021, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2021-08 modifying Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the American Canyon Municipal Code to add “Chapter 8.20 Mandatory Municipal Solid Waste, Recycling and Compost Material Disposal Reduction.” A requirement of State Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383), the Ordinance will:
• Divert 50 percent of organic waste from landfills below 2014 levels by 2020 and 75 percent by 2025;
The Potrero Hills Landfill located in
Solano County.
947
5. UTILITIES
Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 | U-17 • Set a goal to recover a minimum of 20 percent of currently disposed edible food for human consumption by 2025; and
• Require organics recycling education and outreach to all residents, businesses, haulers, and food recovery organizations
Goals and Policies
Goal U-7: Solid Waste Collection
Maximize source reduction, recycling, and composting in the solid waste disposal programs. (Source: Existing General Plan, Goal 5F) Policies
U-7.1: Waste Management Services. Continue waste management service contracts to provide quality and cost-effective solid waste removal throughout the city and require all residents and businesses to comply with solid waste collection and recycling service requirements. (Source: New Policy)
U-7.2: Levels of Service. Conduct monitoring solid waste collection contractor operations to ensure franchise agreement service levels are maintained. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy
5.19.2)
U-7.3: Landfill Coordination. Coordinate with the Napa-Vallejo Waste Management Authority (NVWMA) concerning the City’s
continuing use of the Potrero Hills Landfill. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.19.3, modified)
Goal U-8: Solid Waste Source Reduction
Achieve maximum public participation in source reduction, recycling, and composting activities through outreach programs. (Source: Existing General Plan, Goal 5G, modified)
U-8.1: Recycling Education and Information. Coordinate with NapaVallejo Waste Management Authority (NVWMA) and Recology to expand public information and education programs to
948
U-18 | Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 complement source reduction, recycling, and composting
efforts. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.20.1, modified) U-8.2: Expansion of Recycling Programs. Expand recycling programs through the local waste hauler. (Source: New Policy)
U-8.3: Promotion of Recycling. Promote the recycling of solid waste including but not limited to paper, metals, aluminum cans, green waste, cardboard, plastic and glass. (Source: Existing General Plan, Implementation Program 15.61, modified)
U-8.4: Outreach to Schools. Coordinate efforts at the local elementary and intermediate school level to provide youth education programs. (Source: Existing General Plan, Implementation Program 15.62, modified)
U-8.5: Recycling Receptacles and Biodegradable/Recycled-Materials Products. Require the availability of recycling and composting receptacles and use biodegradable or recycled-material
products instead of single-use plastic products at all City facilities and City-sponsored events. (Source: New Policy) U-8.6: Zero Waste Community. Support American Canyon in implementing policies and programs to become a Zero Waste Community. (Source: New Policy)
U-8.7: Food Waste Collection. Ensure food waste collection is available and convenient to residents and businesses. (Source:
New Policy)
U-8.8: Green Business Program. Encourage local businesses to participate in the Napa County Green Business Program to minimize waste generation and create recycling and
composting programs to reduce waste. (Source: New Policy) U-8.9: Demolition and Construction Waste. Require all new development to comply with the current CALGreen
requirements for construction and demolition waste diversion. (Source: New Policy)
949
5. UTILITIES
Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 | U-19 Energy Utilities
Energy in many forms is an essential public service. As energy demand increases it may strain existing energy systems and resources. A shift toward alternative energy resources can supplement future demands sustainably.
Shift to Renewable Energy
Since 2016, the City has been enrolled in the Light Green program, Marin Clean Energy (MCE)’s default energy plan that offers 60% renewable energy. In 2021, American Canyon City Council voted to supply the City's facilities with MCE Deep Green 100% renewable energy. The change to Deep Green will remove approximately 247,000 pounds of carbon dioxide from American Canyon’s carbon footprint per year. (Source: Media Release - American Canyon Opts Into 100% Renewable Energy for Its City Facilities, 2021)
The City’s switch to Deep Green adds to a growing list of American Canyon’s clean energy initiatives, including the Citywide Energy Efficiency and Resiliency Project (CEERP). The City joined MCE in 2016 and has since been enrolled in the electricity provider’s 60% renewable energy option. Before switching to MCE, the City was enrolled in Pacific Gas and Electric's (PG&E) 29% renewable option.
MCE is an alternative to PG&E for energy generation; all residents and local businesses were automatically enrolled in Light Green also have the option to opt up to Deep Green. Customers pay higher rates for Deep Green but do not have to pay any upfront fees to upgrade. (Source: Media Release - American Canyon Opts Into 100% Renewable Energy for Its City Facilities, 2021) In addition to the City’s association with a greener electric source from MCE, residents have installed solar energy at their homes with rooftop photovoltaic panels (PVEs). The Residential PVE permit activity trends show increasing onsite, carbon free energy generation. Changes in building codes that call for greater energy efficiency in all new construction will increase this trend for the foreseeable future.
950
U-20 | Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 Goals and Policies
Goal U-9: Energy Resilience and Conservation
Improve energy system resilience with energy conservation and access to renewable energy sources. (Source: New Goal)
Policies
U-9.1: Reach Building Code. Reduce energy use in new development by considering a local amendment that requires a 15% energy efficient standard improvement over the California Building Code. (New Policy)
U-9.2: Electric Energy Systems. Coordinate with Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) to ensure that electrical energy systems do not adversely impact land uses and population in the City of American Canyon. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 1.1.2.3.8)
U-9.3: Resilient Grid. Cooperate with PG&E to obtain applicable City permit approvals that improve electric grid resilience to natural hazards (seismic events, flooding, wildfires, extreme wind events). (Source: New Policy)
U-9.4: Overhead Utility Undergrounding. Develop a comprehensive strategy to underground existing overhead utilities. (Source:
New Policy)
U-9.5: Passive Solar Heating and Cooling. Consistent with the California Subdivision Map Act, require new subdivisions to examine the feasibility of incorporating site layouts that allow passive solar heating and cooling. (Source: New Policy) U-9.6: Residential Energy Efficiency. Seek grant funds that help low and moderate-income residents obtain low or no-cost loans to increase energy efficiency of their homes through
weatherization, insulation, solar energy generation and energy battery backup storage; and assist utility providers with outreach on home energy efficiency rebates and programs for all residents, regardless of income. (Source: New Policy) 951
5. UTILITIES
Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 | U-21 Implementation Programs
Programs
Implements
Which
Policy(ies)
Responsible
Supporting
Department(s)
2023
– 2025
2026
– 2030
2031
– 2040
Annual
Ongoing
A Public Education
Educate the community on effective water
conservation methods through a variety of
outreach methods. Maintain updated water
conservation resources on the City’s website.
(Source: New Implementation Program)
U-1.4 Maintenance
and Utilities
Public Works ◼
B Rate Structure
Develop a rate schedule structured to promote
water conservation.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.4.2)
U-1.4 Maintenance
and Utilities
Public Works
◼
C Demand Monitoring
Annually monitor the demands on the water
system and, as necessary, manage development
to mitigate impacts and/or facilitate
improvements.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.7.5)
U-1.7 Maintenance
and Utilities
◼
D Operational Criteria
Develop a set of operational criteria and
compare with performance of current water
distribution, storage, and treatment facilities.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.7.10,
modified)
U-1.7 Public Works
◼
E Water Audits
Collaborate with efforts by local water
providers to promote water audit programs
that offer free water audits to single-family,
multi-family, large landscape accounts, and
commercial customers.
(Source: New Implementation Program)
U-1.9
U-1.10
Public Works
◼
F Capital Improvement Program Update
Review and update every five years a new fiveyear Capital Improvement program for adoption and prioritization by the City Council.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Implementation
Program 15.26)
U-3.1 Public Works
City Manager
Maintenance
and Utilities
◼ ◼ ◼
952
U-22 | Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 Programs
Implements
Which
Policy(ies)
Responsible
Supporting
Department(s)
2023
– 2025
2026
– 2030
2031
– 2040
Annual
Ongoing
G Impact Fees
Review and amend as necessary and
appropriate, drainage impact fees and service
charges collected from new development for
the construction of new facilities necessitated
by the new development. (Source: Existing
General Plan, Implementation Programs 15.30
and 15.31)
U-3.1
U-3.3
Public Works
◼
H Storm Drainage and Flood Control Standards
Review and update every five years the storm
drainage and flood control improvement
standards to set forth minimum requirements
for the planning, design, construction and
maintenance of storm drainage and flood
control improvements.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Implementation
Program 15.25)
U-3.1
U-3.3
U-3.4
U-3.7
U-3.8
U-3.10
U-3.11
U-3.12
Public Works
◼ ◼ ◼
I
Low Impact Guidelines
Establish Low-Impact Development (LID)
guidelines to limit the amount of impervious
surface in new development and to increase the
retention, treatment, and infiltration of urban
stormwater runoff. LID measures should also
apply to major remodeling projects and to
public and recreation projects where possible.
(Source: New Implementation Program)
U-3.8 Maintenance
and Utilities
Public Works
◼
J Sewer Improvement Standards
Prepare sewer system improvement standards
and review every five years to minimum
requirements are in place for the planning,
design, construction, and maintenance of
wastewater improvements.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Implementation
Program 15.46)
U-4.1 Maintenance
and Utilities
◼ ◼ ◼
K Review of Sewer Rates
Review and update sewer rates annually for
operation and maintenance of the wastewater
system.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Implementation
Program 15.49)
U-4.1 Maintenance
and Utilities
City Manager ◼
953
5. UTILITIES
Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 | U-23 Programs
Implements
Which
Policy(ies)
Responsible
Supporting
Department(s)
2023
– 2025
2026
– 2030
2031
– 2040
Annual
Ongoing
L Wastewater Master Plan
Update the City's Wastewater Master Plan as
necessary to accurately determine which
collection and treatment facilities will be
needed to serve present and future growth in
the city.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.15.3)
U-4.1 Maintenance
and Utilities
◼
M Capital Improvement Program on Wastewater
Implement a five-year capital improvement
program to upgrade and maintain the City's
wastewater collection system.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.15.4)
U-4.1 Maintenance
and Utilities
City Manager
◼ ◼ ◼
N Water Master Plan
Update the Wastewater Master Plan every five
years to define existing conditions and reflect
significant changes in the planned land use
within the City. Capital improvement plans and
prioritization schedules shall also be prepared.
The utility systems shall be updated
accordingly. City maintenance and replacement
actions shall be identified.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Implementation
Program 15.45)
U-4.1
U-4.2
U-4.5
Maintenance
and Utilities
◼ ◼ ◼
O Capacity Recording
Establish and maintain a record of the capacity
and utilization of wastewater collection and
treatment facilities serving the City of American
Canyon, monitoring impacts and demands of
new development, and, as necessary, managing
development to mitigate impacts and/or
facilitate improvements.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.14.6)
U-4.4 Maintenance
and Utilities
◼
P Fee Review
Review sewer connection fees, capacity fees,
and monthly service charges, as necessary, to
ensure that adequate amounts of fees and
charges are collected to fund the
operation/maintenance of existing facilities and
to construct new facilities.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 5.16.2)
U-4.5 Maintenance
and Utilities
City Manager ◼
954
U-24 | Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 Programs
Implements
Which
Policy(ies)
Responsible
Supporting
Department(s)
2023
– 2025
2026
– 2030
2031
– 2040
Annual
Ongoing
Q Updating Standards and Guidelines
Regularly update design standards and/or
guidelines to reflect best practices for:
• open space /landscaping, filter strips,
grass swales,
• infiltration/sedimentation areas to be
used in minimizing impervious area
which is directly connected to piped or
channelized drainage systems, and
• detention facilities which will provide
a dual purpose (water quality
enhancement and detention) function.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Implementation
Programs 15.39 and 15.40, modified)
U-4.7 Maintenance
and Utilities
Community
Development
Public Works
◼ ◼
R Municipal Facilities Recycled Water
Implement recycled water for new municipal
facilities and landscaping by connecting new
facilities to the recycled water pipeline network.
(Source: New Implementation Program)
U-4.9 Public Works
◼
S Residential Recycled Water Program
Promote the Residential Recycled Water
Program on social media and posting
information on the City’s online utility billing
portal for residents.
(Source: New Implementation Program)
U-4.9 Public Works
◼
T Levels of Service
Develop and implement a plan that provides a
level of service that will comply with all
applicable solid waste regulations and rules
while remaining cost efficient, while seeking
federal fund to offset any associated fiscal
impacts.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 5.19
and Implementation Program, 15.63, modified)
U-5.1 Maintenance
and Utilities
◼
U Annual Reduction Report
Prepare an annual progress report in
collaboration with Napa County to report the
progress and documentation of solid waste and
recycling reduction.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Implementation
Program 15.64, modified)
U-5.1
U-5.3
U-6.1
U-6.2
Maintenance
and Utilities
City Manager ◼
955
5. UTILITIES
Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 | U-25 Programs
Implements
Which
Policy(ies)
Responsible
Supporting
Department(s)
2023
– 2025
2026
– 2030
2031
– 2040
Annual
Ongoing
V Funding for Receptacles
Identify appropriate funding sources for placing
and maintaining trash and/or recycling
receptacles in the City.
(Source: Existing General Plan, Implementation
Program 15.60)
U-6.5 Maintenance
and Utilities
Public Works ◼
W Zero Waste Action Plan
Create and adopt a zero-waste action plan to
maximize waste diversion.
(Source: New Implementation Program)
U-6.6 Maintenance
and Utilities
Public Works
◼
X Food Waste and Recycling Standards.
Update the municipal code to establish
standards for food waste and recycling
collection for residential, commercial, and
industrial development. (Source: New
Implementation Program)
U-6.7 Community
Development
◼
Y Improve Efficiency in Existing Buildings
Study possible measures to improve energy and
water efficiency in existing buildings.
(Source: New Implementation Program)
U-7.3
U-7.4
Community
Development ◼
956
U-26 | Public Review Draft Utilities Element | May 2025 This page is intentionally left blank.
957
6. ENVIRONMENT, PARKS & RECREATION
Public Review Draft Environment, Parks & Recreation Element | May 2025 | ENV-1 Environment, Parks
& Recreation
American Canyon and its surrounding areas contain natural habitats and cultural and historical resources that significantly benefit the environment, history, and quality of life for the community. Together with Parks and Recreation, the Environmental Element provides a strategy for preserving and enhancing our human and natural environment. 6 958
ENV-2 | Public Review Draft Environment, Parks & Recreation Element | May 2025 This page is intentionally left blank.
959
6. ENVIRONMENT, PARKS & RECREATION
Public Review Draft Environment, Parks & Recreation Element | May 2025 | ENV-3 Introduction
American Canyon’s environmental resources are critical features that define our character and quality of life. In our community, environmental resources include:
• Biological Resources
• Water Resources
• Soil Resources
• Cultural and Historic Resources
• Regional and Local Open Space
• Parks and Recreation
• Scenic Resources
• Air Quality and Climate Change
Why Is Protecting the Environment and enhancing Recreation and Open Space Important?
Our natural environment, combined with recreation and open space are central features of our community’s quality of life. Preserving the environment retains important ecosystems that life itself depends. For American Canyon residents, our environment defines American Canyon as our home – a place with familiar physical features that endure for generations.
The City’s open space system provides places for recreation, activity, and engagement, for peace and enjoyment, and for freedom and relief from the built world. Physical recreation reduces obesity and risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and other health ailments. Public open spaces, whether playgrounds, picnic fields or even just engaging streets, can help build community by giving neighbors a realm in which to get to know each other, and giving children a safe place to play.
960
ENV-4 | Public Review Draft Environment, Parks & Recreation Element | May 2025 Biological Resources
American Canyon has rich habitat areas in and around the community. The Napa River tidal wetland area lies at the western city boundary. Smaller wetlands are located within the city boundaries, including rivers and streams that traverse the city from east to west. These important ecosystems provide habitat for special-status species that rely on wetland or riparian habitats.
American Canyon is also located alongside critical habitat for a variety of natural species, including the California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) to the east of the city, and vernal pool fairy shrimp. (Branchinecta lynchi) to the northwest. (Source: New Text)
Justification: The biological resources of any particular development site would be characterized by qualified biologists during the CEQA review process.
What is critical habitat?
Critical habitat, as defined by the
Endangered Species Act, are
specific geographic areas that are
important for the protection
and/or recovery of an endangered
or threatened species.
961
6. ENVIRONMENT, PARKS & RECREATION
Public Review Draft Environment, Parks & Recreation Element | May 2025 | ENV-5 ENV-Figure 1: Vegetation Communities in American Canyon 962
ENV-6 | Public Review Draft Environment, Parks & Recreation Element | May 2025 Special-Status Species
A special status species is listed on the federal and/or State Endangered Species Acts as endangered, threatened, a candidate for listing, or of special concern. American Canyon and the surrounding areas are potentially home to numerous special-status species, including 30 plants, 26 birds, 10 fish, five invertebrates, five mammals, two amphibians, and one reptile.
Goals and Policies
Goal ENV-1:
Protect and preserve significant habitats, plants and wildlife within the city and areas of its jurisdiction. (Source: Existing General Plan, Goal 8) Policies
ENV-1.1: Areas of Significant Biological Value. Maintain data and information regarding areas of significant biological value within the Planning Area to facilitate resource conservation and the appropriate management of development. (Source:
Existing General Plan, Objective 8.1)
ENV-1.2: Sensitive Habitat Assessment and Impact Mitigation. Require new development and redevelopment located within
sensitive habitats, including coastal saltmarsh, mixed
hardwood forest, oak savannah, vernal pools, and riparian habitats to provide a detailed assessment of the potential for impacts on these resources, and include measures to reduce any identifiable impacts. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy
8.2.1, modified)
ENV-1.3: Habitat Conservation. Support habitat conservation efforts to set aside and preserve suitable habitats, with priority given to habitats for rare and endangered species in American Canyon in accordance with state and federal resource agency
requirements. (Source: New Policy)
ENV-1.4: Native Species. Encourage the use of native vegetation where possible. (Source: New Policy)
963
6. ENVIRONMENT, PARKS & RECREATION
Public Review Draft Environment, Parks & Recreation Element | May 2025 | ENV-7 ENV-1.5: Open Space Network. Establish a network of open spaces along the city's natural drainages and riparian corridors and link significant biological habitats by restricting alteration to these resources and limiting land uses. Any recreational use of these areas shall be designed to avoid damaging sensitive habitat areas. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 8.3.5, modified)
ENV-1.6: Urban Forest. Build upon existing streetscapes and develop an urban forest within the City’s streets, parks, and open space to provide avian habitat, sequester carbon monoxide
emissions, foster pedestrian activity, and provide shade. (Source: New Policy)
ENV-1.7: Trees for Pollinators. Support sustainable pollinator species (i.e.: bees, birds, butterflies) in American Canyon by planting low-water use pollinator-supportive trees in streets, parks, open spaces, and private development. (Source: New Policy) ENV-1.8: Education and Appreciation. With community partners, support a range of educational programs that cultivate an appreciation of American Canyon’s natural environment and biological resources. (Source: New Policy)
ENV-1.9: Natural Drainage Preservation. Through the development review process, evaluate opportunities to preserve natural onsite drainages and consider opportunities to incorporate pedestrian paths and greenbelts along their lengths. (Source:
Existing General Plan, Policy 8.3.6, modified)
ENV-1.10: Natural Resource Integrity. Consistent with Federal and State Resource Permitting agencies, encourage activities that improve the biological value and integrity of the city’s natural resources through vegetation restoration, control of invasive plants and animals, and landscape buffering. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 8.4.3)
ENV-1.11: Napa River Studies. Support state and federal studies of the Napa River wetlands and riverine systems. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 8.1.2)
964
ENV-8 | Public Review Draft Environment, Parks & Recreation Element | May 2025 Water Resources
There are six primary watercourses within the Planning Area: American Canyon Creek, North Slough Creek, Rio Del Mar Creek, Rio Del Mar Creek, No Name Creek, and Fagan Creek. These watercourses have well-defined channels upstream with sparse vegetation due to the streams being dry most of the year. The downstream reaches of the creeks have significant vegetation along banks because of year-round flows mostly generated from development runoff.
Most of the city’s precipitation falls as rain during the months of November through April with the most rainfall in December and January. The mean annual precipitation is between 22 and 23 inches.
Goals and Policies
Goal ENV-2:
Maintain the quality of surface and subsurface water resources within the City of American Canyon and the Urban Limit Line. (Source: Modified Existing General Plan, Goal 8.8A)
Policies
ENV-2.1: Creek Preservation. Maintain American Canyon Creek within its natural waterway. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy
8.7.1)
ENV-2.2: Existing Streams and Creeks. As required by wetland resource permitting agencies, require To the extent feasible, new development to incorporate existing streams and creeks into proposed development plans in their natural state to prevent degradation, erosion, or sedimentation and help impart a unique character to the city. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 8.7.2, modified) Justification: Clarifies that the city’s priority is to preserve existing streams and creeks, not rely on outside agency permit decisions.
965
6. ENVIRONMENT, PARKS & RECREATION
Public Review Draft Environment, Parks & Recreation Element | May 2025 | ENV-9 ENV-2.3: Minimize Soil Erosion. Implement best management practices from the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to prevent soil erosion impacts on water resources. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 8.8.1, modified) ENV-2.4: Stormwater Drainage on Development Sites. Through the development review process, evaluate methods to ensure
required stormwater drainage systems are environmentally sensitive safe, and attractive. (Source: New Policy)
ENV-2.5: Public Education. Protect existing water resources by continuing public education on safe disposal of household hazardous waste and storm drain pollution prevention (i.e.:
“only rain down the drain”). (Source: New Policy)
Cultural and Historic
Resources
The American Canyon area has a rich Native American history and is the traditional territory of the Patwin. Tribes in the area include the Cortina Rancheria – Kletsel Dehe Band of Wintun Indians, the Confederated Villages of Lisjan, and Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation.
Goals and Policies
Goal ENV-3:
Preserve and restore sites, and structures that have architectural, historical, archaeological and/or cultural significance to the City of American Canyon. (Source: Existing General Plan, Goal 8.8.E Modified)
ENV-3.1: Resource Protection. Ensure the City's culturally, historically, and archaeologically significant resources are protected in a manner that preserves and/or enhances the inherent
resource value. (Source: Existing General Plan, Objective 8.19, modified)
ENV-3.2: Historic Structure Compatibility. Encourage compatibility between new development and existing adjacent historic
966
ENV-10 | Public Review Draft Environment, Parks & Recreation Element | May 2025 structures in terms of scale, massing, building materials and general architectural treatment. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 8.19.4, modified)
ENV-3.3: Historic Resource Reuse. Encourage appropriate adaptive reuse of historic resources where possible to prevent misuse, disrepair, and demolition. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 8.20.5, modified)
ENV-3.4: Historical Building Code. When historical structures are rehabilitated in accordance with established historic
preservation guidelines, consider implementing the State Historical Building Code Part 8, Title 24. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy 8.20.3, modified)
ENV-3.5: Historic Resource Preservation. Prohibit demolition of an historic resource as a first-choice alternative for resources that qualify for Federal, State Historic Registration, or Locally Significant Resources. (Source: Existing General Plan, Policy