Apple Valley City Council
January 24, 2023

and take the following actions:

Section 1. The recitals above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. Find that the changes proposed by General Plan Amendment GPA 2022-006 & Development Code Amendment DCA 2022-002 are consistent with the Goals and Policies of the Town of Apple Valley adopted General Plan. The following are the Findings for a General Plan Amendment required under Section 9.02.050(F) of the Development Code, with a comment to address each:

1. The reasons for the recommendation are previously stated hereinabove as well as in the Staff Report.

2. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals, policies and standards of all elements of the General Plan and will further those goals, policies and standards. Policy 1.A.3 of the Housing Element requires the periodic review of the Development Code for possible amendment to reduce housing construction cost without sacrificing basic health and safety considerations. To minimize health and safety consideration, the Amendment will only apply to lot splits fronting on to existing roads, which are already used by existing residents and emergency vehicles.

3. The General Plan, as amended, will comprise an integrated, internally consistent and compatible statement of policies for the Town;
a. The Amendments would only allow lot splits under limited narrow circumstances, such as outlying remote rural areas, to facilitate the construction of new single-family residences. In certain areas, dirt roads are part of the rural character and desert environment that is commonly referred to in the General Plan, as follows:
i. In Apple Valley “rural” means space -- unscarred mountains and vistas of desert valleys, neighborhoods of large lots where keeping horses is allowed, an extensive multi-use trail system, and landscaping consistent with the desert environment. (Page II-3) ii. In discussing future direction, the General Plan states that “the Town must work hard to preserve its rural character as it grows.” (Page II16) iii. The purpose statement in the Housing Element states that Apple Valley has traditionally been a residential community with a focus on rural character and quality of life. (Page II-96)

4. The proposed General Plan Amendment complies with CEQA for the reasons stated herein below.

Section 3. The following are the Findings for a Development Code Amendment required under Section 9.06.060 of the Development Code, with a comment to address each:

1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan. Policy 1.A.3 of the adopted Housing Element requires the periodic review of the Development Code for possible amendment to reduce housing construction cost without sacrificing basic health and safety considerations.

2. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare of the Town or its residents. The lot splits will occur on larger parcels and on existing roads that are currently used by existing residents and emergency vehicles.

Section 4. The Land Use Element of the General Plan is hereby amended to read as follows (with bold and underlined language as the new language):
“Program 4.E.5 The Development Code will be amended to allow infill homes, or parcel maps, in existing neighborhoods to match roadway improvements of the two adjacent lots. For example, if the lots adjacent to the infill home do not have curb and gutter, no curb or gutter would be installed at the infill home. The Development Code should identify rural outlying areas by which lots could be lot split on existing dirt roads when consistent with the rural lifestyle.”
Section 5. The following language is added to Section 9.71.080 (B)(4) of the Development Code as follows:
“(B)(4) Exception: A lot split, under this Section, can be accomplished if all the following apply:
a. The lot, prior to the lot split, would need to be a minimum of 2 gross acres or more in lot size, and not more than 10 gorss acres. However, the Director shall have the discretion to approve a lot split on a property of 10 gross acres or more if it can be determined that a subdivision as envisioned in the General Plan cannot be feasiblly constructed on the lot due to significant infastructure constraints. b. The lot would need to be zoned residential or agricultural, and located east of Navajo Road or south of Bear Valley Road. These regulations do not apply to properties zoned Very Low Density Residential (R-VLD), also known as the Apple Valley Dry Lake. The lot shall not be on a road designated on the Circulation Map, also called Street System Map (Exhibit II-6) of the General Plan. c. The lot would need to front on to an existing dirt road, which the road is physically existing and graded at least 12 feet wide as of the date of this Ordinance, and the road is legally dedicated or can be dedicated as part of, or in conjunction with the lot split. The lot split would need to demonstrate legal access to the Town’s nearest maintained road.
d. Both physical and legal access must be approved by the Apple Valley Fire District or conditioned to comply with the district’s requirements prior to recordation of the

lot split.
e. The property is not within 200 feet of sewer.”
Section 6. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act. This Resolution has been assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines and it has been determined that approval of the Resolution is exempt from further environmental review under the general rule in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) that CEQA only applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. As a series of text amendments and additions without any physical project being approved, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Resolution will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission concurs in these findings and adopts them as its own.

Approved and Adopted by the Planning Commission of the Town of Apple Valley this 2 nd
day of November 2022
Chairman Mike Arias

Planning Commission Secretary

Town Council Agenda Report
Date: January 24, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Subject: INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 563 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN

COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 12.20, ENTITLED “SPECIAL SPEED LIMITS” OF TITLE 12 OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE”

From: Douglas Robertson, Town Manager
Submitted by: Mike Podegracz, Town Engineer
Engineering
Budgeted Item: Yes No N/A

RECOMMENDED ACTION
A. Move to waive the reading of Ordinance No. 563 in its entirety and read by title only.

B. Introduce No. 563 An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley, California, amending Chapter 12.20., entitled “Special Speed Limits” of Title 12 of the Town of Apple Valley Municipal Code.”

BACKGROUND
The California Vehicle Code (“CVC”) authorizes local agencies to determine the prima facie or maximum speed limit upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey and requires that local agencies review changes in local speed limits on a periodic basis to determine if the speed limits require updating due to age of the engineering and traffic survey or due to changes in roadway conditions.

On June 28, 2022, Council awarded a Professional Services Agreement to KOA Corporation for the 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) to evaluate speed limits at roadway segments located in the Town of Apple Valley. Engineering and traffic surveys were completed by KOA between July 2022 and November 2022 on a total of 47 street segments within the Town limits. The segments have been updated due to the age of the previous surveys or changes in roadway conditions resulting in a recommendation to:
maintain the current speed limit for 34 of the segments and decrease the speed limit for

13 segments. In addition, it has been determined that changes in the prima facie or maximum speed limits are appropriate for five additional segments not previously included in the ordinance bringing the total number of segments for this update to 52. The evaluation of the five additional segments is included in the attached report from Michael Baker International.

Segments to retain the existing speed limit (34 segments) are as follows:

Street Segment
Existing Posted
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Algonquin Road Bear Valley Road to Sitting Bull Road 35 35 Apple Valley Road Verbena Street to Tussing Ranch Road 45 45 Apple Valley Road Tussing Ranch Road to Del Oro Road 45 45 Apple Valley Road Del Oro Road to Town Center Drive 45 45 Apple Valley Road Pimlico Road to Yucca Loma Road 55 55 Bear Valley Road Westmont Drive to Mohawk Road 55 55
Bear Valley Road Quinnault Road to Eastern Town Limits 55 55 Central Road Bear Valley Road to Nisqually Road 55 55
Del Oro Road Apple Valley Road to Deep Creek Road 45 45 Iroquois Road Pah-Ute Road to Rancherias Road 35 35
Kamana Road Apple Valley Road to Siskiyou Road 45 45
Kiowa Road Tussing Ranch Road to Bear Valley Road 50 50 Kiowa Road Bear Valley Road to Highway 18 45 45
Kiowa Road Highway 18 to Navajo Road 45 45
Navajo Road Bear Valley Road to Ottawa Road 50 50
Navajo Road Ottawa Road to Highway 18 40 40
Otoe Road Rancherias Road to Dale Evans Parkway 50 50
Ottawa Road Rincon Road to Kiowa Road 40 40
Ottawa Road Kiowa Road to Navajo Road 45 45
Rancherias Road Highway 18 to Flathead Road 35 35
Rancherias Road Flathead Road to Yucca Loma Road 45 45
Rimrock Road Outer Highway 18 North to Rancherias Road 45 45 Riverside Drive Sahale Lane to Mingo Road 40 40
Riverside Drive Mingo Road to Tacony Road 40 40
Riverside Drive Tacony Road to Branding Iron Road 40 40 Seneca Road Apple Valley Road to Rancherias Road 45 45
Sitting Bull Road Apple Valley Road to Rincon Road 45 45 Sitting Bull Road Rincon Road to Kiowa Road 45 45
Sitting Bull Road Kiowa Road to Navajo Road 45 45
Thunderbird Road Rancherias Road to Dale Evans Parkway 45 45 Thunderbird Road Dale Evans Parkway to Navajo Road 50 50 Tomahawk Road Mandan Road to Rancherias Road 45 45
Yucca Loma Road Kiowa Road to Navajo Road 45 45
Zuni Road Rancherias Road to Dale Evans Parkway 45 45

Segments to decrease the speed limit (13 segments) are as follows:

Street Segment
Existing Posted
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Apple Valley Road Town Center Drive to Pimlico Road 50 45 Bear Valley Road Western Town Limits to Westmont Drive 50 45 Bear Valley Road Mohawk Road to Quinnault Road 55 50
Central Road Nisqually Road to Highway 18 55 50
Dale Evans Parkway Highway 18 to Thunderbird Road 45 40 Jess Ranch Parkway Town Center Drive to Bear Valley Road 35 30 Kamana Road Siskiyou Road to Misanake Road 45 40
Kamana Road Misanake Road to Tao Road 45 40
Mondamon Road Apple Valley Road to Highway 18 45 40
Rincon Road Sitting Bull Road to Rancherias 45 40
Shoshonee Road Apple Valley Road to Seminole Road 45 40 Standing Rock Avenue Outer Highway 18 North to Navajo Road 50 45 Tuscola Road Apple Valley Road to Nokomis Road 45 40
Segments not in current Ordinance and to be added (5 segments) are as follows:

Street Segment
Existing Posted
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Nisqually Road Navajo Road to Central Road Not Posted 45 Ottawa Road Central Road to Johnson Road Not Posted 45
Sandia Road Kiowa Road to Mohawk Road Not Posted 40
Sandia Road Mohawk Road to Navajo Road Not Posted 40
South Road Central Road to Joshua Road Not Posted 50

ANALYSIS
The Engineering and Traffic Surveys were conducted in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), effective March 30, 2021 (Revision 6). These Surveys have been conducted to determine the appropriate speed limits for radar speed enforcement in the Town of Apple Valley as required by the CVC. Speed limits should be set in five-mph increments at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. Provisions given in the CVC and the CA MUTCD for establishing speed limits based on the prevailing speed of traffic also allow for a five-mph reduction where applicable and when engineering justification is provided.

The updated speed limits are identified in the Engineering and Traffic Survey reports attached.

FISCAL IMPACT
To facilitate the change of speed limits, new signs will come from our sign inventory or be purchased, and the removed signs will go back into the sign inventory stock. Funding has been included for sign installations in the adopted Fiscal Year 2022/23 Budget.

ATTACHMENTS
A. Ordinance No. 563
B. 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey report prepared by KOA Corporation C. Appendix documents for 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey report prepared by KOA Corporation
D. Engineering and Traffic Survey report prepared by Michael Baker International

ORDINANCE NO. 563

AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN

OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER

12.20, ENTITLED “SPECIAL SPEED LIMITS” OF TITLE 12

OF THE TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code, including, but not limited to, sections 22357 and 22358, authorizes local authorities to increase or decrease local speed limits upon the basis of conducting an engineering and traffic survey; and WHEREAS, State regulations require that local authorities review changes in local speed limits on a periodic basis to determine if the speed limits require updating; and WHEREAS, the Town currently regulates speed limits in the Town of Apple Valley pursuant to State law under Chapter 12.20 of the Apple Valley Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Town has determined that forty-seven segments currently included in section 12.20.020 of the Town of Apple Valley Municipal Code require updating, maintaining the current speed limit for thirty-four of the segments; and decreasing the speed limit for thirteen segments; and
WHEREAS, five segments not previously included in section 12.20.020 require a new speed limit; and
WHEREAS, the desire to ensure the orderly movement of traffic in a reasonable and safe manner through appropriate speed limits requires the Council to take action.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley, California, does ordain as follows:

Section 1. Chapter 12.20 entitled “SPECIAL SPEED LIMITS” of Title 12 of the Town of Apple Valley Municipal Code is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
“Chapter 12.20 - SPECIAL SPEED LIMITS

12.20.010 Basis of Change or Determination
The prima facie speed limit declared for each street or portion thereof designated in section 12.20.020 is a speed limit which is either an increase from the prima facie speed limit or a decrease from the maximum speed limit otherwise applicable to such street or portion thereof pursuant to Chapter 7 of Division 11 of the Vehicle Code of the State (commencing at section 22348 thereof). The increase or decrease has been determined upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. For each street or portion thereof upon which an increase in the prima facie speed limit (otherwise applicable) has been declared, a determination has been made that the increased declared prima facie speed

Ordinance 563
limit is the most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe.

For each street or portion thereof upon which a decrease from the maximum speed limit (otherwise applicable) has been made and a lower speed limit declared as the prima facie speed limit, a determination has been made that the maximum speed limit (otherwise applicable) is more than is reasonable or safe, and that the declared prima facie speed limit is most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe.

12.20.020 Changes in State Law Speed Limits
The prima facie speed limit declared in this section for each street or portion of a street designated shall be effective from and after the posting of appropriate signs giving notice thereof. The names of the streets upon which special prima facie speed limits are hereby declared, the portion of such streets affected by the declaration, and the declared prima facie speed limits therefor is as follows:

Name of Street Portion Affected
Declared Prima
Facie Speed Limit
(In Miles Per Hour)
Algonquin Road From Bear Valley Road
To Sitting Bull Road
35 Apple Valley Road From Verbena Street
To Tussing Ranch Road
45 Apple Valley Road From Tussing Ranch Road
To Del Oro Road
45 Apple Valley Road From Del Oro Road
To Town Center Drive
45 Apple Valley Road From Town Center Drive
To Pimlico Road
45 Apple Valley Road From Pimlico Road
To Yucca Loma Road
55 Apple Valley Road From Yucca Loma Road
To Symeron Road
55 Apple Valley Road From Symeron Road
To Highway 18
50 Bear Valley Road From Western Town Limits
To Westmont Drive
45 Bear Valley Road From Westmont Drive
To Mohawk Road
55

Ordinance 563
Bear Valley Road From Mohawk Road
To Quinnault Road
50 Bear Valley Road From Quinnault Road
To Eastern Town Limits
55 Central Road From Bear Valley Road
To Nisqually Road
55 Central Road From Nisqually Road
To Highway 18
50 Dale Evans Parkway From Highway 18
To Thunderbird Road
40 Del Oro Road From Apple Valley Road
To Deep Creek Road
45 Flathead Road From Tonawanda Road
To Highway 18
45 Flathead Road From Highway 18
To Ramona Avenue
45 Iroquois Road From Pah-Ute Road
To Rancherias Road
35 Jess Ranch Parkway From Town Center Drive
To Bear Valley Road
30 Kamana Road From Apple Valley Road
To Siskiyou Road
45 Kamana Road From Siskiyou Road
To Misanake Road
40 Kamana Road From Misanake Road
To Tao Road
40 Kiowa Road From Tussing Ranch Road
To Bear Valley Road
50 Kiowa Road From Bear Valley Road
To Highway 18
45 Kiowa Road From Highway 18
To Navajo Road
45 Mohawk Road From Tussing Ranch Road
To Bear Valley Road
50 Mondamon Road From Apple Valley Road
To Highway 18
40

Ordinance 563
Nanticoke Road From Ramona Avenue
To Thunderbird Road
40 Navajo Road From Bear Valley Road
To Ottawa Road
50 Navajo Road From Ottawa Road
To Highway 18
40 Navajo Road From Highway 18
To 300’ North of Pineridge Road
45 Navajo Road From 300’ North of Pineridge Road
To Thunderbird Road
50 Nisqually Road From Navajo Road
To Central Road
45 Nokomis Road From Riverside Drive
To Symeron Road
40 Otoe Road From Rancherias Road
To Dale Evans Parkway
50 Ottawa Road From Rincon Road
To Kiowa Road
40 Ottawa Road From Kiowa Road
To Navajo Road
45 Ottawa Road From Navajo Road
To Central Road
40 Ottawa Road From Central Road
To Joshua Road
45 Powhatan Road From Navajo Road
To Central Road
40 Ramona Avenue From Navajo Road
To Standing Rock Avenue
40 Ramona Avenue From Standing Rock Avenue
To Thunderbird Road
40 Ramona Avenue From Navajo Road
To Central Road
45 Rancherias Road From Highway 18
To Flathead Road
35 Rancherias Road From Flathead Road
To Yucca Loma Road
45

Ordinance 563
Rimrock Road From Highway 18
To Corwin Road
40 Rimrock Road From Outer Highway 18 North
To Rancherias Road
45 Rincon Road From Sitting Bull Road
To Rancherias Road
40 Riverside Drive From Sahale Lane
To Mingo Road
40 Riverside Drive From Mingo Road
To Tacony Road
40 Riverside Drive From Tacony Road
To Branding Iron Road
40 Sandia Road From Kiowa Road
To Mohawk Road
40 Sandia Road From Mohawk Road
To Navajo Road
40 Seneca Road From Riverside Drive
To Apple Valley Road
45 Seneca Road From Apple Valley Road
To Rancherias Road
45 Shoshonee Road From Apple Valley Road
To Seminole Road
40 Sitting Bull Road From Apple Valley Road
To Rincon Road
45 Sitting Bull Road From Rincon Road
To Kiowa Road
45 Sitting Bull Road From Kiowa Road
To Navajo Road
45 South Road From Central Road
To Joshua Road
50 Standing Rock Avenue From Outer Highway 18 North
To Navajo Road
45 Symeron Road From Riverside Drive
To Apple Valley Road
35 Thunderbird Road From Rancherias Road
To Dale Evans Parkway
45

Ordinance 563
Thunderbird Road From Dale Evans Parkway
To Navajo Road
50 Tomahawk Road From Mandan Road
To Rancherias Road
45 Tonikan Road From Ramona Avenue
To Thunderbird Road
40 Tuscola Road From Apple Valley Road
To Nokomis Road
40 Yucca Loma Road From Apple Valley Road
To Rincon Road
45 Yucca Loma Road From Rincon Road
To Kiowa Road
45 Yucca Loma Road From Kiowa Road
To Navajo Road
45 Zuni Road From Rancherias Road
To Dale Evans Parkway
45 Spring Valley Lake
Equestrian Area
For the area bound by: North of
Bear Valley Road, east of West
Town limits, South of Ottawa
Road, West of Apple Valley Road
35 Area north of Bear Valley
Road at Multnomah Road
For the area of: Multnomah Road,
Caddo Road, and Klamath Road
30 Area south of Bear Valley
Road at Laguna Road
For the area of: Bear Valley Road
on the north, Kiowa Road on the
west, Sandia Road on the south,
and Mohawk Road on the east
35 ”
Section 2. Effective Date: This ordinance shall become effective thirty days from and after its adoption.

Section 3. Notice of Adoption: The Town Clerk of the Town of Apple Valley shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause publication to occur in a newspaper of general circulation and published and circulated in the Town in a manner permitted under section 36933 of the Government Code.

Ordinance 563
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Apple Valley and signed by the Mayor and attested by the Town Clerk this 14th day of February, 2023.
_______________________________
Scott Nassif, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
La Vonda M-Pearson, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
___________________________ _______________________________ Thomas Rice, Town Attorney Douglas B. Robertson, Town Manager

Final Report
Engineering and Traffic Surveys
2023
Prepared for
Town of Apple Valley, CA
Engineering Department
14955 Dale Evans Parkway
Apple Valley, CA 92307
Prepared by:

December 29, 2022
5095 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 330, San Diego, CA 92123 T: 619.683.2933 | F: 619.683.7982 | www.koacorp.com

MONTEREY PARK CULVER CITY ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO
Project # JC22053 December 30, 2022
Town of Apple Valley

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 1 of 40
Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 3

2.0 PURPOSE ......................................................................................................................... 3

3.0 APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE.................................................. 5

3.1. WORDS AND PHRASES DEFINED (CVC 627)........................................................ 5

3.2. BASIC SPEED LAW (CVC 22350) .......................................................................... 5

3.3. SPEED LAW VIOLATIONS (CVC 22351)................................................................ 6

3.4. PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS (CVC 22352) ........................................................... 6

3.5. INCREASE OF LOCAL LIMITS UP TO 65 MILES PER HOUR (CVC 22357) .............. 7

3.6. DECREASE OF LOCAL SPEED LIMITS (CVC 22358)............................................... 7

3.7. DECREASE ON NARROW STREET (CVC 22358.3) ................................................ 8

3.8. DOWNWARD SPEED ZONING (CVC 22358.5) ..................................................... 8

3.9. BOUNDARY LINE STREETS (CVC 22359).............................................................. 8

3.10. NOTICE OF AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE MAXIMUM SPEED LIMIT (CVC 22366)................................................................................................................. 9

3.11. SPEED TRAP PROHIBITION (CVC 40801)............................................................. 9

3.12. SPEED TRAPS (CVC 40802).................................................................................. 9

3.13. SPEED TRAP EVIDENCE (CVC 40803) ................................................................ 11

4.0 ELEMENTS OF AN ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY .................................. 12

4.1. SPEED SAMPLING.............................................................................................. 12

4.2. SPEED LIMITS .................................................................................................... 13

4.3. DATA COLLECTION............................................................................................ 13

4.4. PROCEDURES .................................................................................................... 14

4.5. COLLISION HISTORY .......................................................................................... 17

4.6. CONDITIONS NOT READILY APPARENT TO MOTORISTS................................... 20

5.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................... 23

5.1. Algonquin Road between Bear Valley Road and Sitting Bull Road .................. 27

5.2. Apple Valley Road between Town Center Drive and Del Oro Road................. 27

5.2A. Apple Valley Road between Del Oro and Tussing Ranch Road ........................ 27

5.2B. Apple Valley Road between Tussing Ranch Road and Verbena Street............ 27

5.3. Apple Valley Road between Town Center Drive and Pimlico Road ................. 28

5.4. Apple Valley Road between Pimlico Road and Yucca Loma Road ................... 28

5.5. Bear Valley Road between Western Town Limits and Westmont Drive.......... 28

5.6. Bear Valley Road between Westmont Drive and Mohawk Road..................... 29

5.7. Bear Valley Road between Mohawk Road and Quinnault Road...................... 29

5.8. Bear Valley Road between Quinnault Road and Eastern Town Limits............. 29

5.9. Central Road between Bear Valley Road and Nisqually Road.......................... 30

5.9A. Central Road between Nisqually Road and Highway 18 .................................. 30

5.10. Dale Evans Parkway between Highway 18 and Thunderbird Road ................. 30

5.11. Del Oro Road between Apple Valley Road and Deep Creek Road ................... 30

5.12. Iroquois Road between Pah-Ute Road and Rancherias Road .......................... 31

5.13. Jess Ranch Parkway between Town Center Drive and Bear Valley Road ........ 31

5.14. Kamana Road between Apple Valley Road and Siskiyou Road ........................ 31

5.14A. Kamana Road between Siskiyou Road and Misanake Road............................. 31

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 2 of 40

5.14B. Kamana Road between Misanake Road and Tao Road................................... 32

5.15. Kiowa Road between Bear Valley Road and Tussing Ranch Road ................... 32

5.16. Kiowa Road between Bear Valley Road and Highway 18................................. 32

5.17. Kiowa Road between Highway 18 and Navajo Road........................................ 32

5.18. Mondamon Road between Highway 18 and Apple Valley Road...................... 33

5.19. Navajo Road between Bear Valley Road and Ottawa Road ............................. 33

5.20. Navajo Road between Ottawa Road and Highway 18 ..................................... 33

5.21. Otoe Road between Rancherias Road and Dale Evans Parkway...................... 33

5.22. Ottawa Road between Rincon Road and Kiowa Road...................................... 34

5.23. Ottawa Road between Kiowa Road and Navajo Road ..................................... 34

5.24. Rancherias Road between Flathead Road and Yucca Loma Road ................... 34

5.25. Rancherias Road between Highway 18 and Flathead Road............................. 34

5.26. Rimrock Road East between Outer Highway 18 North and Rancherias Road . 35

5.27. Rincon Road between Sitting Bull Road and Rancherias Road ........................ 35

5.28. Riverside Drive between Sahale Lane and Mingo Road................................... 35

5.28A. Riverside Drive between Mingo Road and Tacony Road ................................. 36

5.28B. Riverside Drive between Tacony Road and Branding Iron Road..................... 36

5.29. Seneca Road between Apple Valley Road and Rancherias Road ..................... 36

5.30. Shoshonee Road between Apple Valley Road and Seminole Road ................. 36

5.31. Sitting Bull Road between Apple Valley Road and Rincon Road...................... 37

5.32. Sitting Bull Road between Rincon Road and Kiowa Road ................................ 37

5.33. Sitting Bull Road between Kiowa and Navajo Road ......................................... 37

5.34. Standing Rock Avenue between Outer Highway 18 North and Navajo Road.. 37

5.35. Thunderbird Road between Rancherias Road and Dale Evans Parkway ......... 38

5.36. Thunderbird Road between Dale Evans Parkway and Navajo Road................ 38

5.37. Tomahawk Road between Rancherias Road and Mandan Road ..................... 39

5.38. Tuscola Road between Apple Valley Road and Nokomis Road........................ 39

5.39. Yucca Loma Road between Kiowa Road and Navajo Road .............................. 39

5.40. Zuni Road between Rancherias Road and Dale Evans Parkway....................... 39

6.0 APPENDIX.......................................................................................................... 40 P:\Project|JC22053/Apple Valley Engineering and Traffic Surveys Draft E&TS.doc

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 3 of 40

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report has been prepared by KOA Corporation for the Town of Apple Valley to present the results and recommendations of an engineering and traffic survey for 47 roadway segments in the Town of Apple Valley, CA. The engineering and traffic survey was conducted in accordance with California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), last updated in March 30, 2021 (Rev.6). These Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) have been conducted to determine the appropriate speed limitsfor radar speed enforcement in the Town of Apple Valley.

According to California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 40802, as amended by AB 43 with effective date January 1, 2022, radar or other electronically collected evidence is invalid if the speed limit was not justified by an E&TS conducted within five years prior to the alleged violation, or within seven years if the arresting officer had completed a training course and used calibrated electronic equipment. An E&TS may be valid as long as 14 years if a registered engineer determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred. If the required surveys are more than 5, 7, or 14 years old, the court may reject the evidence of speeding obtained by use of radar under CVC Section 40802 and 627, and Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD).

2.0 PURPOSE
A speed zone survey is required to establish the appropriate speed limit for a street per California Vehicle Code Section 40802(b) speed limits established under Sections 22352(b) 1, 22354, 22357, 22358, and 22358.3.

New CVC Section 22358.6, created with the passage of Assembly Bill 43, became effective January 1, 2022 and reads:
22358.6 The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. However, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment. A local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8. (Added by Stats. 2021, Ch. 690, Sec. 6. (AB 43) Effective January 1, 2022.) New CVC Section 22358.7, also passed through AB 43, would allow a further 5 miles per hour reduction in the speed limit for designated safety corridors or where high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians are present. However, a local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024 or until an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide is developed. For the purposes of this E&TS, this CVC section will not be applied.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 4 of 40
In contrast, new CVC Section 22358.8(a) is immediately applicable. It reads:
22358.8 (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.
(b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the current speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
22358.9 (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour.
(2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit.
(C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit.
(b) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway.
(3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8.
(d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
(Added by Stats. 2021, Ch. 690, Sec. 6. (AB 43) Effective January 1, 2022.)

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 5 of 40

3.0 APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE

3.1. WORDS AND PHRASES DEFINED (CVC 627)
(a) “Engineering and traffic survey,” as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of the highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

3.2. BASIC SPEED LAW (CVC 22350)
No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 6 of 40

3.3. SPEED LAW VIOLATIONS (CVC 22351)
(a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

3.4. PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS (CVC 22352)
The prima facie limits are as follows and the same shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) 15 miles per hour:
(1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
(2) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of his approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all such highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right‐of‐way signs or controlled by official traffic controlsignals.
(3) On any alley.
(b) 25 miles per hour:
(1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.
(2) When passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. Such prima

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 7 of 40
facie limit shall also apply when passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. (3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.

3.5. INCREASE OF LOCAL LIMITS UP TO 65 MILES PER HOUR (CVC 22357) (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25‐mile‐per‐hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

3.6. DECREASE OF LOCAL SPEED LIMITS (CVC 22358)
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, or 25 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 8 of 40
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

3.7. DECREASE ON NARROW STREET (CVC 22358.3)
Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

3.8. DOWNWARD SPEED ZONING (CVC 22358.5)
It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

3.9. BOUNDARY LINE STREETS (CVC 22359)
With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 9 of 40

3.10. NOTICE OF AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE MAXIMUM SPEED LIMIT (CVC 22366)
(a) Whenever the Director of Transportation determines the date upon which the state may establish a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour on highways without subjecting the state to a reduction in the amount of federal aid for highways, the director shall notify the Secretary of State of that determination.
(b) The notice required under subdivision (a) shall state that it is being made pursuant to this section.
(c) The notice shall specify a date which is either the date determined pursuant to subdivision (a), or a later date designated by the director.

3.11. SPEED TRAP PROHIBITION (CVC 40801)
No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.

3.12. SPEED TRAPS (CVC 40802)
(a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. (b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is defined by the latest functional usage and federal‐aid system maps submitted to the federal Highway Administration, except that when these maps have not been submitted, or when the street or road is not shown on the maps, a "local street or road" means a street or road that primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 10 of 40
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one‐half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445. (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section "school zone" means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone" also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. (c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A "speed trap" is either of the following:

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 11 of 40
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B) (i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years.
(ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.

3.13. SPEED TRAP EVIDENCE (CVC 40803)
(a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap.
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 12 of 40

4.0 ELEMENTS OF AN ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on public streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. This engineering and traffic survey was conducted in accordance with California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 and California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD, last updated in March 30, 2021, Rev.6.).

The California Vehicle Code (CVC) directs the methodology used for completing Engineering and Traffic Surveys to include an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, crash history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the speed zone study are discussed in more detail as follows.

This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for several roadways. This survey was requested by the Town of Apple Valley so that posted speed limits can be updated to enable the Police Department and/or other law enforcement to use radar for speed enforcement. Engineering and traffic surveys that support the prima facie speed limit are required by Sections 40801 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) before enforcement by radar is applied. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every five years. This provision assures that posted speed limits are kept reasonably current.

The CVC (Section 40802) offers an exception to the required survey on local streets as defined by federal‐aid system maps submitted to the Federal Highway Administration. If maps have not been submitted, local streets are defined as those streets primarily providing access to abutting residential property and meeting the following three conditions:

1. Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.

2. Not more than one‐half mile of uninterrupted length (interruptions include stop signs or traffic signals).

3. Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.

These engineering and traffic surveys were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California Department of Transportation’s Traffic Manual, as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code. The code further specifies the elements of an engineering and traffic survey to include:

4.1. SPEED SAMPLING
Existing vehicle speeds were surveyed through the use of a recently calibrated radar device. Speed samples were taken for each segment representing a significant sample of current traffic. This data was then evaluated to identify the distribution of traffic. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. This is the

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 13 of 40
speed that represents the speed at which 85 percent of the traffic travel at or below. This level of travel speed represents what is assumed to be a behavior by motorists which is safe and reasonable.

4.2. SPEED LIMITS
Posted speed limits are primarily established to protect the general public from the unreasonable behavior of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dangerous drivers. They provide law enforcement with the means to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This statute states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and that the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus of those who drive the highway as to what speed is reasonable and safe, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A speed survey is usually used to determine the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed limits are also established to advise of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and adjacent land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually coordinated with visible changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one‐half mile in length should be avoided to reduce confusion.

Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually considered a violator for enforcement purposes.

4.3. DATA COLLECTION
Data was obtained regarding the prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic collisions, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. Speed measurements were conducted at various dates using a certified radar gun between August 10, 2022 and November 22, 2022.

The criteria and operational procedures described below were used to measure vehicle speeds with radar devices on selected street segments along each surveyed roadway.

Traffic in both directions was recorded at each location. The specific location on each street segment was selected after considering the following:

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 14 of 40

1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence.

2. Minimum visibility restrictions.

3. Non‐congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways.

4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle.

All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions during off‐peak periods. A sample of 100 vehicles(50 vehicles in each direction), and at a few low volume locations a sample of 50 vehicles (25 vehicles in each direction) was obtained on each roadway segment surveyed.

4.4.PROCEDURES
The results of the speed measurements were computed and analyzed and are summarized in this report. Significant values obtained from the computations are as follows:

The critical speed, or 85th Percentile Speed, is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. This is the speed that represents the speed at which 85 percent of the traffic travel is at or below. This level of travel speed represents what is assumed to be a behavior by motorists which is safe and reasonable. Therefore, a "basic speed limit" is established at the nearest 5‐mile‐per‐hour increment of the 85th percentile speed. For example, if the 85th percentile speed is 38 miles per hour, the basic speed limit becomes 40 miles per hour. If the 85th percentile speed is 37 miles per hour, the basic speed limit is 35 miles per hour.

The Median Speed, or 50th Percentile Speed, represents the mid‐point value within the range of recorded speeds for a particular roadway location. As such, 50% of the vehicles travel faster than, and 50% travel slower than, the median speed.

The 10 MPH Pace is the 10 miles per hour increment range, which contains the largest number of recorded vehicles. The pace is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the sample surveyed. Speed limits are normally set to fall within the 10 MPH pace.

However, conditions not readily apparent to the driver or adhering to State mandated limits such as in the Residential Districts may require setting speed limits below the 10 MPH pace.

The results are summarized in Table 1. All data collection sheets are included in the Appendices.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 15 of 40
Table 1: Speed Survey Results
Line No. Street Segment Existing Posted
Speed Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
50th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Pace Speed
Range
(MPH)
Percent in
Pace (%)
1 Algonquin Road Bear Valley Road To Sitting Bull Road 35 43 36 31 - 40 73% 2 Apple Valley Road
Town Center Drive To Del Oro Road 45 47 43 39 - 49 83%
2A Del Oro Road To Tussing Ranch Road 45 49 45 40 - 49 82% 2B Tussing Ranch Road To Verbena Street 45 51 47 44 - 53 90% 3 Apple Valley Road Town Center Drive to Pimlico Road 50 47 41 36 - 45 62% 4 Apple Valley Road Pimlico Road To Yucca Loma Road 55 57 54 50 - 59 83% 5 Bear Valley Road Western Town Limits To Westmont Drive 50 48 44 40 - 49 69% 6 Bear Valley Road Westmont Drive To Mohawk Road 55 54 51 46 - 55 88% 7 Bear Valley Road Mohawk Road To Quinnault Road 55 54 50 44 - 53 79% 8 Bear Valley Road Quinnault Road To Eastern Town Limits 55 54 50 45 - 54 87% 9 Central Road Bear Valley Road To Nisqually Road 55 56 50 45 - 54 61% 9A Nisqually Road To Highway 18 55 54 48 45 - 54 67%
10 Dale Evans Parkway Highway 18 To Thunderbird Road 45 42 38 34 - 43 90% 11 Del Oro Road Apple Valley Road To Deep Creek Road 45 45 40 34 - 43 68% 12 Iroquois Road Pahute Road To Rancherias Road 35 38 36 31 - 40 90% 13 Jess Ranch Parkway Town Center Drive To Bear Valley Road 35 32 28 23 - 32 81% 14 Kamana Road
Apple Valley Road To Siskiyou Road 45 51 46 41 - 50 72% 14A Siskiyou Road To Misanake Road 45 42 37 32 - 41 76% 14B Misanake Road To Tao Road 45 44 38 33 - 42 68%
15 Kiowa Road Bear Valley Road To Tussing Ranch Road 50 55 52 47 - 56 83% 16 Kiowa Road Bear Valley Road To Highway 18 45 48 45 41 - 50 89% 17 Kiowa Road Highway 18 To Navajo Road 45 48 43 37 - 46 75% 18 Mondamon Road Highway 18 To Apple Valley Road 45 42 38 33 - 42 87% 19 Navajo Road Bear Valley Road To Ottawa Road 50 51 46 42 - 51 80% 20 Navajo Road Ottawa Road To Highway 18 40 41 36 32 - 41 74%

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 16 of 40
Line No. Street Segment Existing Posted
Speed Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
50th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Pace Speed
Range
(MPH)
Percent in
Pace (%)
21 Otoe Road Rancherias Road To Dale Evans Parkway 50 54 47 41 - 51 83% 22 Ottawa Road Rincon Road To Kiowa Road 40 40 37 31 - 40 85% 23 Ottawa Road Kiowa Road To Navajo Road 45 48 40 35 - 44 58% 24 Rancherias Road Flathead Road To Yucca Loma Road 45 44 41 37 - 46 91% 25 Rancherias Road Highway 18 To Flathead Road 35 41 38 34 - 43 92% 26 Rimrock Road East Outer Highway 18 North To Rancherias Road 45 51 44 40 - 49 68% 27 Rincon Road Sitting Bull Road To Rancherias Road 45 43 38 33 - 42 75% 28 Riverside Drive
Sahale Lane To Mingo Road 40 41 38 32 - 41 84%
28A Mingo Road To Tacony Road 40 40 37 32 - 41 86%
28B Tacony Road To Branding Iron Road 40 38 34 29 - 38 86% 29 Seneca Road Apple Valley Road To Rancherias Road 45 44 41 36 - 45 87% 30 Shoshonee Road Apple Valley Road To Seminole Road 45 43 39 34 - 43 85% 31 Sitting Bull Road Apple Valley Road To Rincon Road 45 53 47 43 - 53 83% 32 Sitting Bull Road Rincon Road To Kiowa Road 45 46 44 39 - 48 81% 33 Sitting Bull Road Kiowa Road To Navajo Road 45 45 40 36 - 45 75% 34 Standing Rock Avenue Outer Highway 18 North To Navajo Road 50 48 43 38 - 47 77% 35 Thunderbird Road Rancherias Road To Dale Evans Parkway 45 46 41 37 - 46 86% 36 Thunderbird Road Dale Evans Parkway To Navajo Road 50 55 51 47 - 56 70% 37 Tomahawk Road Rancherias Road To Mandan Road 45 48 43 38 - 47 72% 38 Tuscola Road Apple Valley Road To Nokomis Road 45 40 37 32 - 41 93% 39 Yucca Loma Road Kiowa Road To Navajo Road 45 51 46 42 - 51 80% 40 Zuni Road Rancherias Road To Dale Evans Parkway 45 45 42 36 - 45 87% Source: KOA Corporation, 2022

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 17 of 40

4.5. COLLISION HISTORY
Collisions which occurred on each of the street segments during the past three years were reviewed to determine whether there was a higher than average incident of speed related collisions.

The available collision information was obtained from the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records Systems (SWITRS) Report for the Town of Apple Valley. Collisions which occurred on these street segments during the three‐year period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 were reviewed to determine whether there was a significantly higher than average rate of collisions. All collision summary sheets are included in the Appendices.

The actual total collision rate (collisions per million vehicle miles) for roadway segments were compared with the published statewide average rate in an urban environment as shown in the 2019 Collision Data on California State Highways.

E&TS Collision Rate (Sample Calc)
Sources: 2019 Crash Data on California State Highways
“A” Avenue between “D” Drive and “S” Street
Approx. Length (Miles): 1.18
Total # of Midblock Collisions: 10
Average Daily Volume: 9672
Time (Years): 2
Formula for Collision Rate:
# midblock Collisions x 106
Vol x Time (years) x 365 x Length (miles)
Collision Rate: 10 x 106
9672 x 2 x 365 x 1.18
Collision Rate = 1. 20 C/MVM
Rural, Mountainous, Urban
Roadway Classification: Secondary Arterial
Land Use: Commercial/Residential
Number of Lanes: 2-4
Prevailing Speed: <40 mph
Countywide Avg. Collision Rate: 1.32
Std. Deviation of Mean: 0.74
Significantly Higher Than Avg?: No

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 18 of 40
A summary of collisions are summarized in Table 2 below Table 2: Study Area Roadway Segments Collision Summary
Line
No. Street Segment
Number
of
Collisions
from
1/1/19 to
12/31/21
Severity Total Collision Rate
per MVM
Primary
Collision
Factor
Injury
Fatal
ADT
Actual Rate
2019 CA
Statewide
Average
Unsafe
Speed
Collisions
1 Algonquin
Road
Bear Valley Road To Sitting Bull
Road 3 0 0 1389 1.97 1.08 1
2 Apple Valley
Road
Town Center Drive To Del Oro
Road 2 0 0 8147 0.22 1.08 1
2A Del Oro Road To Tussing Ranch
Road 2 1 0 3728 0.49 1.08 1
2B Tussing Ranch Road To Verbena
Street 0 0 0 1496 0 1.08 0
3 Apple Valley
Road
Town Center Drive to Pimlico
Road 25 2 0 26148* 1.53 1.08 10
4 Apple Valley
Road Pimlico Road To Yucca Loma Road 17 4 0 31208* 0.28 1.08 6 5 Bear Valley
Road
Western Town Limits To
Westmont Drive 73 10 1 44611 1.56 1.08 27
6 Bear Valley
Road Westmont Drive To Mohawk Road 69 15 1 34091 0.80 1.08 16 7 Bear Valley
Road Mohawk Road To Quinnault Road 33 9 2 24527 1.23 1.08 6 8 Bear Valley
Road
Quinnault Road To Eastern Town
Limits 22 3 2 14014 0.96 1.08 6
9 Central
Road
Bear Valley Road To Nisqually
Road 9 3 0 8473 0.97 1.08 3
9A Nisqually Road To Highway 18 10 3 0 8497 1.07 1.08 4 10 Dale Evans
Parkway Highway 18 To Thunderbird Road 12 2 0 8509 2.01 1.08 3 11 Del Oro
Road
Apple Valley Road To Deep Creek
Road 9 3 0 3624 3.78 1.08 3
12 Iroquois
Road Pahute Road To Rancherias Road 5 0 1 1200 1.73 1.08 2 13 Jess Ranch
Parkway
Town Center Drive To Bear Valley
Road 17 2 0 13343 2.33 1.08 3
14 Kamana
Road
Apple Valley Road To Siskiyou
Road 7 2 0 3458 3.7 1.08 1
14A Siskiyou Road To Misanake Road 0 0 0 1440 0 1.08 0
14B Misanake Road To Tao Road 0 0 0 1023 0 1.08 0
15 Kiowa Road Bear Valley Road To Tussing
Ranch Road 27 5 0 8285 1.49 1.08 6
16 Kiowa Road Bear Valley Road To Highway 18 27 6 2 7134 1.35 1.08 7

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 19 of 40
Line
No. Street Segment
Number
of
Collisions
from
1/1/19 to
12/31/21
Severity Total Collision Rate
per MVM
Primary
Collision
Factor
Injury
Fatal
ADT
Actual Rate
2019 CA
Statewide
Average
Unsafe
Speed
Collisions
17 Kiowa Road Highway 18 To Navajo Road 8 2 0 2482 4.67 1.08 0 18 Mondamon
Road Highway 18 To Apple Valley Road 10 1 0 2934 5.99 1.08 1 19 Navajo Road Bear Valley Road To Ottawa Road 27 4 1 12857 1.28 1.08 3 20 Navajo Road Ottawa Road To Highway 18 26 4 1 14022 1.13 1.08 2 21 Otoe Road Rancherias Road To Dale Evans
Parkway 4 1 0 1290 3.04 1.08 1
22 Ottawa
Road Rincon Road To Kiowa Road 4 1 1 1135 3.32 1.08 0
23 Ottawa
Road Kiowa Road To Navajo Road 8 1 0 2304 6.34 1.08 2
24 Rancherias
Road
Flathead Road To Yucca Loma
Road 6 1 0 1399 3.26 1.08 1
25 Rancherias
Road Highway 18 To Flathead Road 16 3 0 782 9.34 1.08 6 26 Rimrock
Road East
Outer Highway 18 North To
Rancherias Road 13 1 2 1654 13.54

1.08 3
27 Rincon Road Sitting Bull Road To Rancherias
Road 11 4 0 4568 0.91 1.08 3
28 Riverside
Drive
Sahale Lane To Mingo Road 1 0 0 1184 0.91 1.08 0
28A Mingo Road To Tacony Road 5 0 0 914 5.00 1.08 2
28B
Tacony Road To Branding Iron
Road 7 0 0 761 1.85 1.08 0
29 Seneca
Road
Apple Valley Road To Rancherias
Road 3 2 0 1645 1.20 1.08 1
30 Shoshonee
Road
Apple Valley Road To Seminole
Road 1 0 0 1570 0.37 1.08 0
31 Sitting Bull
Road Apple Valley Road To Rincon Road 7 0 0 6607 0.97 1.08 2 32 Sitting Bull
Road Rincon Road To Kiowa Road 3 1 0 4908 0.56 1.08 1
33 Sitting Bull
Road Kiowa Road To Navajo Road 7 1 0 2594 2.46 1.08 1
34 Standing
Rock
Avenue
Outer Highway 18 North To
Navajo Road 7 2 1 1079 4.26 1.08 0
35 Thunderbird
Road
Rancherias Road To Dale Evans
Parkway 13 1 0 5400 2.20 1.08 4
36 Thunderbird
Road
Dale Evans Parkway To Navajo
Road 8 2 0 5768 1.27 1.08 2
37 Tomahawk
Road Rancherias Road To Mandan Road 5 2 0 3459 1.20 1.08 5

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 20 of 40
Line
No. Street Segment
Number
of
Collisions
from
1/1/19 to
12/31/21
Severity Total Collision Rate
per MVM
Primary
Collision
Factor
Injury
Fatal
ADT
Actual Rate
2019 CA
Statewide
Average
Unsafe
Speed
Collisions
38 Tuscola
Road
Apple Valley Road To Nokomis
Road 6 2 0 623 7.85 1.08 0
39 Yucca Loma
Road Kiowa Road To Navajo Road 9 1 0 4085 2.01 1.08 2
40 Zuni Road Rancherias Road To Dale Evans
Parkway 13 5 0 1653 7.18 1.08 1
Sources: 2019-2021 SWITRS and 2019 Collision Data on California State Highways *NOTE: Historical ADT Data

4.6. CONDITIONS NOT READILY APPARENT TO MOTORISTS
Each street segment is reviewed through a field inspection to identify whether conditions not readily apparent to motorists exist. Aspects of the roadway environment such as adjacent land uses, horizontal and vertical sight distance, location and frequency of side streets or driveways, pedestrian and bicyclist behavior are considered. A determination is made whether those conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit be placed at five miles per hour below the basic speed limit.

As previously discussed, speed limits are usually set at or near the critical speed, unless there are other factors not readily apparent to a reasonable motorist which may justify a lower limit. The field review of the selected street segments in the Town considered the visibility obstructions and any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver.

Field information and observations relative to roadway conditions were made on July 26, 2022.

Vehicular 48-Hr ADT (Average Daily Traffic) Counts were conducted on August 16, 2022 through September 14, 2022 and are summarized in Table 3. Radar speed survey measurements sheets were conducted at various dates using a certified radar gun between August 10, 2022 and November 22, 2022 are included in the Appendices.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 21 of 40
Table 3: Traffic Count Summary
Line No. Street Segment Speed Survey Location Direction ADT Volume NB/EB SB/WB Total
1 Algonquin Road Bear Valley Road To Sitting Bull Road 200 ft. North of Okanagan Road NB/SB 748 641 1389 2 Apple Valley Road
Town Center Drive To Del Oro Road 290 ft. South of Jess Ranch Parkway NB/SB 3704 4443 8147 2A Del Oro Road To Tussing Ranch Road 70 ft. North of Marigold Street NB/SB 1854 1874 3728 2B Tussing Ranch Road To Verbena Street 570 ft. South of Tussing Ranch Road NB/SB 755 741 1496 3 Apple Valley Road Town Center Drive to Pimlico Road South of Pimlico Road NB/SB 13195 12953 26148 4 Apple Valley Road Pimlico Road To Yucca Loma Road North of Pimlico Road NB/SB 15436 15772 31208 5 Bear Valley Road Western Town Limits To Westmont Drive 735 ft. West of Jess Ranch Parkway EB/WB 24932 19679 44611 6 Bear Valley Road Westmont Drive To Mohawk Road 150 ft. East of Savage Lane EB/WB 17335 16756 34091 7 Bear Valley Road Mohawk Road To Quinnault Road 530 ft. West of Mohawk Road EB/WB 12068 12459 24527 8 Bear Valley Road Quinnault Road To Eastern Town Limits 140 ft. West of Geode Avenue EB/WB 7084 6930 14014 9 Central Road Bear Valley Road To Nisqually Road 630 ft. South of Pahute Road NB/SB 4327 4146 8473 9A Nisqually Road To Highway 18 590 ft. North of Ottawa Road NB/SB 4171 4326 8497 10 Dale Evans Parkway Highway 18 To Thunderbird Road 450 ft. South of Bass Hill Road NB/SB 4324 4185 8509 11 Del Oro Road Apple Valley Road To Deep Creek Road 80 ft. East of Dandelion Lane EB/WB 2140 1484 3624 12 Iroquois Road Pahute Road To Rancherias Road 330 ft. South of Sholic Road NB/SB 636 564 1200 13 Jess Ranch Parkway Town Center Drive To Bear Valley Road 730 ft. North of Town Center Drive NB/SB 7532 5811 13343 14 Kamana Road
Apple Valley Road To Siskiyou Road 290 ft. East of Quantico Road EB/WB 1949 1509 3458 14A Siskiyou Road To Misanake Road 220 ft. West of Koda Road EB/WB 651 789 1440 14B Misanake Road To Tao Road 240 ft. West of Iwa Road EB/WB 517 506 1023 15 Kiowa Road Bear Valley Road To Tussing Ranch Road 230 ft. South of Del Oro Road NB/SB 4217 4068 8285 16 Kiowa Road Bear Valley Road To Highway 18 460 ft. South of Pahute Road NB/SB 3652 3482 7134 17 Kiowa Road Highway 18 To Navajo Road 200 ft. South of Pine Ridge Avenue NB/SB 1125 1357 2482 18 Mondamon Road Highway 18 To Apple Valley Road 250 ft. South of Chapae Lane NB/SB 1351 1583 2934 19 Navajo Road Bear Valley Road To Ottawa Road 160 ft. North of Navajo Place NB/SB 6718 6139 12857 20 Navajo Road Ottawa Road To Highway 18 190 ft. North of Powhatan Road NB/SB 6831 7191 14022 21 Otoe Road Rancherias Road To Dale Evans Parkway 70 ft. West of Sago Road EB/WB 699 591 1290 22 Ottawa Road Rincon Road To Kiowa Road 160 ft. East of Quapaw Road EB/WB 575 560 1135

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 22 of 40
Line No. Street Segment Speed Survey Location Direction ADT Volume NB/EB SB/WB Total
23 Ottawa Road Kiowa Road To Navajo Road 190 ft. West of Tutelo Road EB/WB 1075 1229 2304 24 Rancherias Road Flathead Road To Yucca Loma Road 370 ft. South of Kiowa Road NB/SB 780 619 1399 25 Rancherias Road Highway 18 To Flathead Road 100 ft. South of Chickasaw Road NB/SB 371 411 782 26 Rimrock Road East
Outer Highway 18 North To Rancherias
Road 1,000 ft. East of Serrano Road EB/WB 923 731 1654
27 Rincon Road Sitting Bull Road To Rancherias Road 390 ft. South of Nowata Road NB/SB 2362 2206 4568 28 Riverside Drive
Sahale Lane To Mingo Road 100 ft. North of Hiouchi Road NB/SB 563 621 1184 28A Mingo Road To Tacony Road 100 ft. West of Riverside Road NB/SB 484 430 914 28B Tacony Road To Branding Iron Road 60 ft. West of Riverside Lane NB/SB 402 359 761 29 Seneca Road Apple Valley Road To Rancherias Road 150 ft. West of Cronese Road EB/WB 810 835 1645 30 Shoshonee Road Apple Valley Road To Seminole Road 175 ft. West of Rincon Road EB/WB 786 784 1570 31 Sitting Bull Road Apple Valley Road To Rincon Road 410 ft. West of Choco Road EB/WB 3335 3272 6607 32 Sitting Bull Road Rincon Road To Kiowa Road 510 ft. East of Iroquois Road EB/WB 2481 2427 4908 33 Sitting Bull Road Kiowa Road To Navajo Road 160 ft. East of Waynoka Road EB/WB 1327 1267 2594 34 Standing Rock Avenue Outer Highway 18 North To Navajo Road 250 ft. East of Cheyenne Road EB/WB 667 412 1079 35 Thunderbird Road Rancherias Road To Dale Evans Parkway 520 ft. East of Wanaque Road EB/WB 2524 2876 5400 36 Thunderbird Road Dale Evans Parkway To Navajo Road 150 ft. East of Cheyenne Road EB/WB 2963 2805 5768 37 Tomahawk Road Rancherias Road To Mandan Road 90 ft. East of Pamlico Road EB/WB 1642 1817 3459 38 Tuscola Road Apple Valley Road To Nokomis Road 95 ft. South of Hiawatha Road NB/SB 324 299 623 39 Yucca Loma Road Kiowa Road To Navajo Road 370 ft. East of Kiowa Road EB/WB 1861 2224 4085 40 Zuni Road Rancherias Road To Dale Evans Parkway 450 ft. East of Serrano Road EB/WB 829 824 1653 Source: KOA Corporation, 2022
ADT = Average Daily Traffic, NB = Northbound, SB = Southbound, WB = Westbound, EB, Eastbound

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 23 of 40

5.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The speed limit recommendations are generally developed based on a review of the 85th percentile speed, roadway surface characteristics, land uses along the roadside, conditions not readily apparent to the driver, and reported crash history for a recent three‐year period. Table 4 shows a summary of recommended speed limits for each of the study roadway segments.

Table 4: Recommended Speed Limits
Line
No. Street Segment
Existing
Posted
Speed
Limit
(MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Recommended
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change
from
Existing
(MPH)
1 Algonquin Road Bear Valley Road To Sitting Bull Road 35 43 35 0 2 Apple Valley Road
Town Center Drive To Del Oro Road 45 47 45 0
2A Del Oro Road To Tussing Ranch Road 45 49 45 0
2B Tussing Ranch Road To Verbena Street 45 51 45 0
3 Apple Valley Road Town Center Drive to Pimlico Road 50 47 45 -5* 4 Apple Valley Road Pimlico Road To Yucca Loma Road 55 57 55 0 5 Bear Valley Road Western Town Limits To Westmont Drive 50 48 45 -5 6 Bear Valley Road Westmont Drive To Mohawk Road 55 54 55 0 7 Bear Valley Road Mohawk Road To Quinnault Road 55 54 50 -5* 8 Bear Valley Road Quinnault Road To Eastern Town Limits 55 54 55 0 9 Central Road Bear Valley Road To Nisqually Road 55 56 55 0 9A Nisqually Road To Highway 18 55 54 50 -5
10 Dale Evans Parkway Highway 18 To Thunderbird Road 45 42 40 -5 11 Del Oro Road Apple Valley Road To Deep Creek Road 45 45 45 0 12 Iroquois Road Pahute Road To Rancherias Road 35 38 35 0 13 Jess Ranch Parkway Town Center Drive To Bear Valley Road 35 32 30 -5 14 Kamana Road
Apple Valley Road To Siskiyou Road 45 51 45 0
14A Siskiyou Road To Misanake Road 45 42 40 -5
14B Misanake Road To Tao Road 45 44 40 -5
15 Kiowa Road Bear Valley Road To Tussing Ranch Road 50 55 50 0 16 Kiowa Road Bear Valley Road To Highway 18 45 48 45 0 17 Kiowa Road Highway 18 To Navajo Road 45 48 45 0
18 Mondamon Road Highway 18 To Apple Valley Road 45 42 40 -5 19 Navajo Road Bear Valley Road To Ottawa Road 50 51 50 0* 20 Navajo Road Ottawa Road To Highway 18 40 41 40 0
21 Otoe Road Rancherias Road To Dale Evans Parkway 50 54 50 0 22 Ottawa Road Rincon Road To Kiowa Road 40 40 40 0

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 24 of 40
Line
No. Street Segment
Existing
Posted
Speed
Limit
(MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Recommended
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change
from
Existing
(MPH)
23 Ottawa Road Kiowa Road To Navajo Road 45 48 45 0
24 Rancherias Road Flathead Road To Yucca Loma Road 45 44 45 0 25 Rancherias Road Highway 18 To Flathead Road 35 41 35 0 26 Rimrock Road East
Outer Highway 18 North To Rancherias
Road
45 51 45 0
27 Rincon Road Sitting Bull Road To Rancherias Road 45 43 40 -5 28 Riverside Drive
Sahale Lane To Mingo Road 40 41 40 0
28A Mingo Road To Tacony Road 40 40 40 0
28B Tacony Road To Branding Iron Road 40 38 40 0
29 Seneca Road Apple Valley Road To Rancherias Road 45 44 45 0 30 Shoshonee Road Apple Valley Road To Seminole Road 45 43 40 -5 31 Sitting Bull Road Apple Valley Road To Rincon Road 45 53 45 0 32 Sitting Bull Road Rincon Road To Kiowa Road 45 46 45 0 33 Sitting Bull Road Kiowa Road To Navajo Road 45 45 45 0 34 Standing Rock Ave. Outer Highway 18 North To Navajo Road 50 48 45 -5 35 Thunderbird Road Rancherias Road To Dale Evans Parkway 45 46 45 0 36 Thunderbird Road Dale Evans Parkway To Navajo Road 50 55 50 0 37 Tomahawk Road Rancherias Road To Mandan Road 45 48 45 0 38 Tuscola Road Apple Valley Road To Nokomis Road 45 40 40 -5 39 Yucca Loma Road Kiowa Road To Navajo Road 45 51 45 0 40 Zuni Road Rancherias Road To Dale Evans Parkway 45 45 45 0 Source: KOA Corporation, 2022
NOTE: * "REDUCED SPEED ZONE AHEAD" R2-4 or W3-5 sign should be installed approaching the SLOWER speed segment along the corridor as listed below.  Southbound Apple Valley Road approaching Pimlico Road  Westbound Bear Valley Road approaching Westmont Drive  Northbound Navajo Road approaching Ottawa Road

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 25 of 40
 REDUCED SPEED ZONE AHEAD" R2-4 or W3-5 sign should be installed approaching the SLOWER speed segment along the corridor as listed below. The CA-MUTCD Signage to be used is as below.  Southbound Apple Valley Road approaching Pimlico Road  Westbound Bear Valley Road approaching Westmont Drive  Northbound Navajo Road approaching Ottawa Road
CA-MUTCD on Reduced Speed Limit Ahead Signs

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 26 of 40

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 27 of 40

5.1. Algonquin Road between Bear Valley Road and Sitting Bull Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 43 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 31‐ 40 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 36 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Algonquin Road be set at 35 MPH in both directions per the new CVC Section 22358.8(a).This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.2. Apple Valley Road between Town Center Drive and Del Oro Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 47 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 39- 49 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 43 MPH. If the speed limit were based solely on the 85th percentile speed, the posted speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road would be established at 45 MPH. After review of study data, field observations, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions. This represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.2A. Apple Valley Road between Del Oro and Tussing Ranch Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 49 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 40- 49 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 45 MPH. If the speed limit were based solely on the 85th percentile speed, the posted speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road would be established at 50 MPH. After review of study data, field observations, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road set to at 45 MPH in both directions per the new CVC Section 22358.6. This represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.2B. Apple Valley Road between Tussing Ranch Road and Verbena Street The observed 85th percentile speed is 51 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 44‐ 53 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 47 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side street at Sunrose St. field observations, flat roadway topography, with no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road remain at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.8(a) is immediately applicable. If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 28 of 40
limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.

This is consistent within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.3. Apple Valley Road between Town Center Drive and Pimlico Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 47 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 36-45 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 41 MPH. If the speed limit were based solely on the 85th percentile speed, the posted speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road would be established at 45 MPH. After review of study data, field observations, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 50 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

NOTE: "45 ZONE AHEAD" (R2-4) sign should be installed 250 or more feet per CA-MUTCD Table 2C.4 as appropriate on Apple Valley Road southbound approaching Pimlico Road according to 2020 Caltrans California Manual For Setting Speed Limits.

5.4. Apple Valley Road between Pimlico Road and Yucca Loma Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 57 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 50‐ 59 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 54 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road maintain at 55 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.5. Bear Valley Road between Western Town Limits and Westmont Drive The observed 85th percentile speed is 48 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 40‐ 49 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 44 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, mixed commercial and residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Bear Valley Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 50 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 29 of 40

5.6. Bear Valley Road between Westmont Drive and Mohawk Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 54 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 46‐ 55 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 51 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Bear Valley Road be set at 55 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the posted 55 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.7. Bear Valley Road between Mohawk Road and Quinnault Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 54 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 44‐ 53 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 50 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, school zone, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Bear Valley Road be set at 50 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 55 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.8. Bear Valley Road between Quinnault Road and Eastern Town Limits The observed 85th percentile speed is 54 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 45‐ 54 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 50 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Bear Valley Road be set at 55 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the posted 55 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 30 of 40

5.9. Central Road between Bear Valley Road and Nisqually Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 56 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 45‐ 54 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 50 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Central Road remain at 55 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.9A. Central Road between Nisqually Road and Highway 18 The observed 85th percentile speed is 54 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 45‐ 54 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 48 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Central Road be set at 50 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 55 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.10. Dale Evans Parkway between Highway 18 and Thunderbird Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 42 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 34‐ 43 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Dale Evans Pkwy be set at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.11. Del Oro Road between Apple Valley Road and Deep Creek Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 45 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 34‐ 43 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 40 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CAMUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Del Oro Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 31 of 40

5.12. Iroquois Road between Pah-Ute Road and Rancherias Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 38 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 31‐ 40 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 36 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Iroquois Road maintain at 35 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.13. Jess Ranch Parkway between Town Center Drive and Bear Valley Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 32 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 23‐ 32 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 28 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Jess Ranch Parkway be set at 30 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 35 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.14. Kamana Road between Apple Valley Road and Siskiyou Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 51 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 41‐ 50 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 46 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Kamana Road remain at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.8(a). This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.14A. Kamana Road between Siskiyou Road and Misanake Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 42 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32‐ 41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 37 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Kamana Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 32 of 40

5.14B. Kamana Road between Misanake Road and Tao Road
The observed 85th percentile speed is 44 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 33‐ 42 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Kamana Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.15. Kiowa Road between Bear Valley Road and Tussing Ranch Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 55 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 47‐ 56 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 52 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Kiowa Road maintain at 50 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.16. Kiowa Road between Bear Valley Road and Highway 18 The observed 85th percentile speed is 48 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 41‐ 50 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 45 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Kiowa Road maintain at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.17. Kiowa Road between Highway 18 and Navajo Road
The observed 85th percentile speed is 48 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 37‐ 46 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 43 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 33 of 40
speed limit for this segment of Kiowa Road maintain at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.18. Mondamon Road between Highway 18 and Apple Valley Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 42 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 33‐ 42 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Mondamon Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.19. Navajo Road between Bear Valley Road and Ottawa Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 51 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 42‐ 51 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 46 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Navajo Road be set at 50 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the posted 50 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.20. Navajo Road between Ottawa Road and Highway 18
The observed 85th percentile speed is 41 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32‐ 41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 36 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Navajo Road to remain at 40 MPH in both directions.

This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.21. Otoe Road between Rancherias Road and Dale Evans Parkway The observed 85th percentile speed is 54 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 41‐ 51 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 47 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 34 of 40
forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Otoe Road be set at 50 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the posted 50 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.22. Ottawa Road between Rincon Road and Kiowa Road
The observed 85th percentile speed is 40 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 31‐40 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 37 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Ottawa Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change in speed from the posted 40 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.23. Ottawa Road between Kiowa Road and Navajo Road
The observed 85th percentile speed is 48 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 35‐ 44 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 40 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Ottawa Road remains at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.24. Rancherias Road between Flathead Road and Yucca Loma Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 44 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 37‐ 46 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 41 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Rancherias Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.25. Rancherias Road between Highway 18 and Flathead Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 41 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 34‐ 43 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 35 of 40
forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Rancherias Road remains at 35 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.26. Rimrock Road East between Outer Highway 18 North and Rancherias Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 51 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 40‐ 49 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 44 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Rimrock Road be maintained at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.27. Rincon Road between Sitting Bull Road and Rancherias Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 43 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 33‐ 42 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Rincon Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.28. Riverside Drive between Sahale Lane and Mingo Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 40 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32‐ 41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Riverside Drive be maintained at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 36 of 40

5.28A. Riverside Drive between Mingo Road and Tacony Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 40 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32‐ 41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 37 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Riverside Drive maintain at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.28B. Riverside Drive between Tacony Road and Branding Iron Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 38 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 29‐ 38 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 34 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Riverside Drive maintain at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.29. Seneca Road between Apple Valley Road and Rancherias Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 44 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 36‐ 45 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 41 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Seneca Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.30. Shoshonee Road between Apple Valley Road and Seminole Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 43 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 34‐ 43 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 39 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Shoshonee Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 37 of 40
represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.31. Sitting Bull Road between Apple Valley Road and Rincon Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 53 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 43‐ 53 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 47 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Sitting Bull Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions per the new CVC Section 22358.8(a).This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.32. Sitting Bull Road between Rincon Road and Kiowa Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 46 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 39‐ 48 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 44 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Sitting Bull Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.33. Sitting Bull Road between Kiowa and Navajo Road
The observed 85th percentile speed is 45 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 36‐ 45 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 40 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Sitting Bull Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions.

This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.34. Standing Rock Avenue between Outer Highway 18 North and Navajo Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 48 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 38‐ 47 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 43 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Standing Rock Avenue be set at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 38 of 40
Section 22358.6.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 50 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

5.35. Thunderbird Road between Rancherias Road and Dale Evans Parkway The observed 85th percentile speed is 46 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 37‐ 46 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 41 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Thunderbird Road remain at 45 MPH in both directions.

This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.36. Thunderbird Road between Dale Evans Parkway and Navajo Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 55 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 47‐ 56 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 51 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Thunderbird Road remain at 50 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 39 of 40

5.37. Tomahawk Road between Rancherias Road and Mandan Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 48 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 38‐ 47 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 43 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Tomahawk Road remain at 45 MPH in both directions per the new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.38. Tuscola Road between Apple Valley Road and Nokomis Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 40 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32‐ 41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 37 MPH. Based on the review of study data, roadway width, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets and signal-controlled controlled intersection, field observations, roadway topography, near to school (Desert Knolls Elementary) and marked School crosswalks at Symeron Rd., residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CAMUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Tuscola Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions.

5.39. Yucca Loma Road between Kiowa Road and Navajo Road The observed 85th percentile speed is 51 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 42‐ 51 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 46 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Yucca Loma Road remain at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

5.40. Zuni Road between Rancherias Road and Dale Evans Parkway The observed 85th percentile speed is 45 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 36‐ 45 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 42 MPH. Based on the review of study data, roadway width, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no on‐street parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Zuni Road be set at 45 MPH in both

Town of Apple Valley – Engineering and Traffic Survey
December 29, 2022 Page 40 of 40
directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

6.0 APPENDIX
A) Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
B) Map of Existing and Recommended Speed Limits
C) Traffic Count Sheets
D) SWITRS 2019-2021 Collision Table
E) Radar Speed Summary Sheets
F) Radar Certifications
G) FHWA Roadway Classification Map
H) Caltrans District 8 - 2019 Crash Data

Appendix A
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Sheets

/Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϭ
RTE# 2295
Algonquin Road
Bear Valley Road
Sitting Bull Road
Local
NB/SB

1.0 Mile
N/A
2 28 Feet
N/A
35 MPH
35 MPH
43 36
08/10/2022
31- 40 4%
73%
23%
200 ft. North of Okanagan Rd
1,389 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 1.97
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
2 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
The Roadway is narrow with no striping. No bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks provided along the roadway.

One northbound lane and one south bound lane with 10 to 16 feet shoulder on each side. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

This roadway is flat. All-way stop controlled intersection at Sitting Bull Rd., Pahute Rd. The rest of intersections are side street stop controlled (Bear Valley Rd, Bear Valley Outerhighway N, Klamath Rd, Nowata Rd, Okanagan Rd, Minodoka Rd, and Lone Eagle Rd).

The observed 85th percentile speed is 43 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 31ţ 40 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 36 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no onţstreet parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Algonquin Road be set at 35 MPH in both directions per the new CVC Section 22358.8(a).This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset 08/16/2022 08/17/2022

12.29.2022

/Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
Ϯ
RTE# 2295
Apple Valley Road
Town Center Drive
Del Oro Road
Local
NB/SB

1.0 Mile
2 4
80 Feet
Yes
45 MPH
45 MPH
47 43
11/22/2022
39 - 49 4%
83%
13%
290 ft. South of Jess Ranch Pkwy
8,147 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 0.22
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has two northbound lanes and two southbound lanes with median divider. Bike lanes are provided for both directions. Curb & gutter, landscape, and sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. Back to back horizontal curves north of and south of Jess Ranch Pkwy.

No parking allowed on both sides of roadway. All-way stop controlled at Town Center, and at Del Oro Rd. and side streets stop controlled in between.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 47 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 39-49 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 43 MPH. If the speed limit were based solely on the 85th percentile speed, the posted speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road would be established at 45 MPH. After review of study data, field observations, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions. This represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/09/2022 08/10/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 278 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
Ϯ
RTE# 2295
Apple Valley Road
Del Oro Road
Tussing Ranch Road
Local
NB/SB

1.0 Mile
2 4
80 Feet
Yes
45 MPH
45 MPH
49 45
08/11/2022
40 - 49 7%
82%
11%
70 ft. North of Marigold St
3,728 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 0.49
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has two northbound lanes and two southbound lanes with median divider. Bike lanes are provided for both directions. Curb & gutter, landscape, and sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. Long horizontal curve between Del Oro Rd. and Arroyo Mesa Ln/Chicory Ct.

No parking allowed on both sides of roadway. All-way stop controlled intersection at Del Oro Rd. Side street stop controlled intersections at Valley Links Blvd, Waterwood St, Marigold St, Arroyo Mesa Ln/Chicory Ct, Marmoset St, and Tussing Ranch Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 49 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 40-49 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 45 MPH. If the speed limit were based solely on the 85th percentile speed, the posted speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road would be established at 50 MPH. After review of study data, field observations, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road set to at 45 MPH in both directions per the new CVC Section 22358.6. This represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/09/2022 08/10/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 279 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
Ϯ
RTE# 2295
Apple Valley Road
Tussing Ranch Road
Verbena Street
Local
NB/SB

0.16 Mile
2 4
80 Feet
Yes
45 MPH
45 MPH
51 47
09/20/2022
44 - 53 8%
90%
2%
570 ft. South of Tussing Ranch Rd
1,496 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has two northbound lanes and two southbound lanes with median divider. Bike lanes are provided for both directions. Curb & gutter, landscape, and sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. Straight alignment.

No parking allowed on both sides of roadway. Side street stop controlled at Sunrose St. intersections.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 51 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 44ţ53 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 47 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side street at Sunrose St. field observations, flat roadway topography, with no onţstreet parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road remain at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.8(a) is immediately applicable.

If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit. This is consistent within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/09/2022 08/10/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 280 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϯ
RTE# 2295
Apple Valley Road
Town Center Drive
Pimilico Road
Minor Arterial
NB/SB

0.57 Mile
2 4
76 Feet
Yes
50 MPH
45 MPH
47 41
08/11/2022
36 - 45 16%
62%
22%
785 ft. South of Bear Valley Rd
26,148 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 1.53
0 0
2 1
8 8
12 0
2 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
The roadway has two northbound lanes and two southbound lanes. Bike lanes are provided for both directions. Curb & gutter are provided on both sides of the roadway, continuous sidewalks are provided on the west side of the roadway and discontinuous sidewalks are provided on the east side of the roadway.

No parking allowed on both sides of roadway. Signal-controlled intersection at Bear Valley Rd.

All-way stop controlled intersection at Town Center Dr.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 47 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 36-45 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 41 MPH. If the speed limit were based solely on the 85th percentile speed, the posted speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road would be established at 45 MPH. After review of study data, field observations, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 50 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

NOTE: "45 ZONE AHEAD" (R2-4) sign should be installed 250 or more feet per CA-MUTCD Table 2C.4 as appropriate on Apple Valley Road southbound approaching Pimlico Road according to 2020 Caltrans California Manual For Setting Speed Limits.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/09/2022 08/10/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 281 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϰ
RTE# 2295
Apple Valley Road
Pimlico Road
Yucca Loma Road
Minor Arterial
NB/SB

1.8 Mile
2 4
90 Feet
Yes
55 MPH
55 MPH
57 54
08/31/2022
50 - 59 11%
83%
6%
505 ft. South of Ottawa Rd
31,208 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 0.28
1 0
2 0
4 3
4 0
6 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has two northbound lanes and two southbound lanes with median divider. Northbound and southbound Class I bike path is provided on east side of the roadway. Street Parking, curb & gutter are provided on both sides of the roadway, and sidewalks are provided on the west side of the roadway.

Signal-controlled intersections at Pimlico Rd, Sitting Bull Rd, Yucca Loma Rd. Side street stop controlled intersections at Powhatan Rd, Ottawa Rd, Kanbridge St/Clearview Farms Ln, Catalina Rd, and Low Ranch Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 57 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 50ţ 59 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 54 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Apple Valley Road maintain at 55 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/09/2022 08/10/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 282 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϱ
RTE# 2295
Bear Valley Road
Western Town Limits
Westmont Drive
Other Principal Arterial
EB/WB

0.96 Mile
N/A
6 126 Feet
Yes
50 MPH
45 MPH
48 44
08/11/2022
40 - 49 21%
69%
10%
735 ft. West of Jess Ranch Pkwy
44,611 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 1.56
7 1
14 2
22 17
21 1
3 3
2 0
4 3
0 0
The roadway has three eastbound lanes and three westbound lanes with median divider. Bike lanes are not provided along the roadway. Curb & gutter sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway.

No parking allowed on both sides of roadway. Signal-controlled at Apple Valley Road, Reata Road, and Jess Ranch Parkway
The observed 85th percentile speed is 48 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 40ţ 49 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 44 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, mixed commercial and residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Bear Valley Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 50 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 283 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϲ
RTE# 2295
Bear Valley Road
Westmont Drive
Mowhawk Road
Other Principal Arterial
EB/WB

2.3 Mile
N/A
4 80 Feet
TWLTL
55 MPH
55 MPH
54 51
08/30/2022
46 - 55 5%
88%
7%
150 ft. East of Savage Ln
34,091 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 0.80
7 0
12 2
14 11
24 0
5 2
1 0
4 1
2 0
The roadway has two eastbound lanes and two westbound lanes with two way left turn lane.

Bike lanes are not provided along the roadway.There are white edge lines provided. Curb & gutter sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway.

No parking allowed on both sides of roadway. Signal-controlled intersections at Deep Creek Rd and Kiowa Rd. Side street stop controlled intersections at Flying Feather Rd, Locust Ln, Cottontail Ln, Viking Ranch Rd, Savage Ln, Braeburn Rd, De Varian Ln, Itoya Vista Rd, Iroquois Rd, and Snapping Turtle Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 54 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 46ţ 55 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 51 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Bear Valley Road be set at 55 MPH in both directions.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the posted 55 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/09/2022 08/10/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 284 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϳ
RTE# 2295
Bear Valley Road
Mowhawk Road
Quinnault Road
Other Principal Arterial
EB/WB

1.0 Mile
N/A
4 60 Feet
TWLTL
55 MPH
50 MPH
54 50
08/11/2022
44 - 53 5%
79%
16%
530 ft. West of Mohawk Rd
24,527 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 1.23
4 0
3 1
6 4
14 0
4 1
0 0
0 0
2 0
The roadway has two eastbound lanes and two westbound lanes with two way left turn land. Bike lanes are not provided alone the roadway. There are white edge lines provided. Curb & gutter and sidewalks are provided on the north side of the roadway. Curb & gutter and sidewalks are not provided on south sides of the roadway.

No parking allowed on both sides of roadway. Signal-controlled intersections at Kiowa Rd, Mohawk Rd, and Navajo Rd. Side street stop controlled intersections at Multnomah Rd, Pecos Rd, and Algonquin Rd. Truck Route. Vicinity of Apple Valley High School, yellow crosswalks at signal on Bear Valley & Navajo Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 54 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 44ţ 53 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 50 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, school zone, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Bear Valley Road be set at 50 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 55 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/09/2022 08/10/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 285 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϴ
RTE# 2295
Bear Valley Road
Quinnault Rd
Eastern Town Limits
Other Principal Arterial
EB/WB

1.5 Mile
N/A
2 to 4
50 - 68 Feet
TWLTL
55 MPH
55 MPH
54 50
08/11/2022
45 - 54 7%
87%
6%
140 ft. West of Geode Ave
14,014 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 0.96
1 0
3 0
6 4
7 0
3 2
0 0
2 0
0 0
Two westbound lanes from Central Rd to Quinnault Rd, one westbound lane from Eastern Town Limits to Central Road. Two eastbound lanes from Navajo Rd to Quinnault Rd and from Geode Ave to Central Rd, one eastbound lane from Quinnault Rd to Geode Ave and from Central Rd to eastern town limits. Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided along the roadway.

No parking allowed on both sides of roadway. Signal-controlled intersections at Navajo Rd and Central Rd. Side street stop controlled intersections at Toltec Dr, Pawnee Rd, Maumee Rd, Rusty Ct, Quinnault Rd, Geode Ave, Bonato Ln, Mesquite Rd/Dennison Rd, Candlewood Rd, and Joshua Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 54 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 45ţ 54 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 50 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Bear Valley Road be set at 55 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the posted 55 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 286 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϵ
RTE# 2295
Central Road
Bear Valley Road
Nisqually Road
Minor Arterial
NB/SB

1.0 Mile
N/A
2 27 - 47 Feet
N/A
55 MPH
55 MPH
56 50
08/11/2022
45 - 54 18%
61%
21%
630 ft. South of Pahute Rd
8,473 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 0.97
0 0
1 0
3 3
5 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one northbound lane and one southbound lane with 10 to 15 feet shoulder on each side. Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided alone the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential.

Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

No parking allowed on both sides of roadway. Signal-controlled intersection at Bear Valley Rd.

Side street stop controlled intersections at Sioux Rd, Pahute Rd, Little Beaver Rd, Sitting Bull Rd, and Nisqually Rd. Skip centerline striping.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 56 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 45ţ 54 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 50 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Central Road remain at 55 MPH in both directions.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 287 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϵ
RTE# 2295
Central Road
Nisqually Road
Highway 18
Minor Arterial
NB/SB

1.0 Mile
N/A
2 25 - 50 Feet
N/A
55 MPH
50 MPH
54 48
08/11/2022
45 - 54 23%
67%
10%
590 ft. North of Ottawa Rd
8,497 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 1.07
3 2
0 0
1 1
4 0
0 0
1 1
1 0
0 0
The roadway has one northbound lane and one southbound lane with 10 feet shoulder on each side. The width of the road is vary. About 1250' of northbound bike lane and curb & gutter are provided on the east side of the roadway beginning at Nisqually Rd. Two way left turn lane is provided from Ojai Rd to Ottawa Rd. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

No parking allowed on both sides of roadway. Signal-controlled intersection at Highway 18.

Side street stop controlled intersections at Ojai Rd, Ottawa Rd, Eyota Rd, Powhatan Rd, Niabi Rd, and Shawnee Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 54 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 45ţ 54 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 48 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Central Road be set at 50 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 55 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 288 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϭϬ
RTE# 2295
Dale Evans Pkwy
Highway 18
Thunderbird Road
Local
NB/SB

0.64 Mile
2 4
85 Feet
Yes
45 MPH
40 MPH
42 38
09/13/2022
34 - 43 6%
90%
4%
450 ft. South of Bass Hill Rd
8,509 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 2.01
3 0
0 0
0 0
5 1
2 2
0 0
1 0
1 0
The roadway has two northbound lanes and two southbound lanes with median divider from Highway 18 to the commercial driveway 675' north of Bass Hill Road. Bike lanes are provided for both directions. Curb & gutter, and sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway from Highway 18 to the commercial driveway 675' north of Bass Hill Road. Two Way Left Turn Lane is provided from the commercial driveway 675' north of Bass Hill Road to Thunderbird Rd.

The roadway has multiple horizontal reverse curves. No parking allowed on both sides of roadway. Signal-controlled intersections at Highway 18, Westlund Way (Plaza Entrance), and Bass Hill Rd. All-way stop controlled intersection at Thunderbird Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 42 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 34ţ 43 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Dale Evans Pkwy be set at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 289 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϭϭ
RTE# 2295
Del Oro Road
Apple Valley Road
Deep Creek Road
Major Collector
EB/WB

0.60 Mile
N/A
2 30-60 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
45 MPH
45 40
08/11/2022
34 - 43 12%
68%
20%
80 ft. East of Dandelion Ln
3,624 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 3.78
1 0
0 0
3 3
4 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane. Bike lanes are not provided along the roadway. Curb & Gutter and sidewalk are provided on the south side of the roadway from Apple Valley Rd to Cottontail Ln.

The roadway narrows down from 60 feet to 30 feet on the east direction. All-way stop controlled intersection at Apple Valley Rd. Side street stop controlled intersections at Dandelion Ln, Cottontail Ln, and Deep Creek Rd. Skip centerline striping.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 45 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 34ţ 43 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 40 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Del Oro Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 290 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϭϮ
RTE# 2295
Iroquois Road
Pah-Ute Road
Rancherias Road
Local
NB/SB

2.2 Mile
N/A
2 22 - 26 Feet
N/A
35 MPH
35 MPH
38 36
08/31/2022
31 - 40 6%
90%
4%
330 ft. South of Sholic Rd
1,200 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 1.73
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 0
2 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one northbound lane and one southbound lane. Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided along the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential.

Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is narrow. All-way stop controlled at Sitting Bull Rd. Side street stop controlled intersections at Pah-Ute Ave, Geronimo Rd, Manitoba Rd, Nebo Ct, Kewanna Rd, Nisqually Rd, Sholic Rd, Ottawa Rd, Eyota Rd, Powhatan Rd, Shawnee Rd, Yucca Loma Rd, Tonawanda Rd, and Rancherias Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 38 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 31ţ 40 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 36 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Iroquois Road maintain at 35 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 291 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϭϯ
RTE# 2295
Jess Ranch Parkway
Town Center Drive
Bear Valley Road
Local
NB/SB

0.5 Mile
N/A
4 80 Feet
Yes
35 MPH
30 MPH
32 28
08/11/2022
23 - 32 6%
81%
13%
730 ft. North of Town Center Dr
13,343 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 2.33
1 0
3 0
2 2
10 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has two northbound lanes and two southbound lanes with median divider and left turn lanes. Bike lanes are not provided. Curb & gutter and sidewalks are provided along the roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial. No bike lanes provided.

The roadway is straight. Signal-controlled intersections at Marketplace Drive and Bear Valley Rd. All-way stop controlled at Town Center Dr. Bus Stops along the segment.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 32 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 23ţ 32 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 28 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Jess Ranch Parkway be set at 30 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 35 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 292 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϭϰ
RTE# 2295
Kamana Road
Apple Valley Road
Siskiyou Road
Local
EB/WB

0.5 Mile
N/A
2 60 Feet
Yes
45 MPH
45 MPH
51 46
08/16/2022
41 - 50 12%
72%
16%
290 ft. East of Quantico Rd
3,458 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 3.70
0 0
1 0
0 0
4 1
0 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane. Bike lanes are not provided. Curb & gutter and discontinuous sidewalks are provided on both side of the roadway. The land use is primarily commercial with some multi-family.

The roadway is straight and wide. Side street stop controlled at all intersections. Skip striping, and double yellow centerline for intersection control.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 51 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 41ţ 50 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 46 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Kamana Road remain at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.8(a). This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 293 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϭϰ
RTE# 2295
Kamana Road
Siskiyou Road
Misannake Road
Local
EB/WB

0.5 Mile
N/A
2 60 Feet
Yes
45 MPH
40 MPH
42 37
08/16/2022
32 - 41 8%
76%
16%
220 ft. West of Koda Rd
1,440 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane. Bike lanes are not provided. Curb & gutter and discontinuous sidewalks are provided on both side of the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is straight and wide. Side street stop controlled at all intersections, and all-way stop controlled at Kasota Rd. Skip centerline striping, and double yellow at curves The observed 85th percentile speed is 42 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32ţ 41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 37 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Kamana Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 294 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϭϰ
RTE# 2295
Kamana Road
Misannake Road
Tao Road
Local
EB/WB

1.0 Mile
N/A
2 60 Feet
Yes
45 MPH
40 MPH
44 38
08/16/2022
33 - 42 11%
68%
21%
240 ft. West of Iwa Rd
1,023 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane. Bike lanes are not provided. Curb & gutter and discontinuous sidewalks are provided on both side of the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is straight and wide. Side street stop controlled at all intersections. Skip centerline striping, double yellow centerline striping approaching curves at Tao Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 44 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 33ţ 42 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Kamana Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 295 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϭϱ
RTE# 2295
Kiowa Road
Bear Valley Road
Tussing Ranch Road
Minor Arterial
NB/SB

2.0 Mile
2 2
40 Feet
Yes
50 MPH
50 MPH
55 52
08/30/2022
47 - 56 11%
83%
6%
230 ft. South of Del Oro Rd
8,285 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 1.49
0 0
1 0
9 5
10 0
4 1
1 0
0 0
2 0
The roadway has one northbound lane and one southbound lane with Two Way Left Turn Lane divider. Bike lanes are provided on both directions. Curb & gutter and sidewalks are not provided along the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is straight and wide. Signal-controlled intersection at Bear Valley Rd. All-way stop controlled intersection at Tussing Ranch Rd. Rest of the intersections are side street stop controlled. No trucks over 5 tons.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 55 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 47ţ 56 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 52 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Kiowa Road maintain at 50 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/09/2022 08/10/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 296 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϭϲ
RTE# 2295
Kiowa Road
Bear Valley Road
Highway 18
Minor Arterial
NB/SB

2.56 Mile
Varies
2 28-35 Feet
Yes
45 MPH
45 MPH
48 45
08/30/2022
41 - 50 7%
89%
4%
460 ft. South of Pahute Rd
7,134 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 1.35
0 0
6 1
5 5
10 0
3 1
0 0
1 0
2 0
The roadway has one northbound lane and one southbound lane with Two Way Left Turn Lane divider from Bear Valley Rd to Yucca Loma Rd and no Two Way Left Turn Lane from Yucca Loma Rd to Highway 18. Bike lanes are provided on both directions from Bear Valley Rd to Yucca Loma Rd and no bike lanes from Yucca Loma Rd to Highway 18. Yucca Loma to Highway 18 has double yellow centerline striping. Curb & gutter and sidewalks are not provided along the roadway, 10 to 15 foot shoulders along this segment. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

Signal-controlled intersections at Bear Valley Rd and Highway 18. All-way stop controlled intersections at Pahute Rd, Sitting Bull Rd, Ottawa Rd, and Yucca Loma Rd. Rest of the intersections are side street stop controlled.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 48 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 41ţ 50 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 45 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Kiowa Road maintain at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/09/2022 08/10/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 297 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϭϳ
RTE# 2295
Kiowa Road
Highway 18
Navajo Road
Major Collector
NB/SB

0.63 Mile
N/A
2 25-70 Feet
Yes
45 MPH
45 MPH
48 43
09/13/2022
37 - 46 6%
75%
19%
200 ft. South of Pine Ridge Ave
2,482 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 4.67
0 0
1 0
1 0
6 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one northbound lane and one southbound lane with double yellow centerline striping from Highway 18 to Navajo Rd. 10 foot shoulders on both side and no bike lanes. Curb & gutter and sidewalks are not provided along the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

Signal-controlled intersection at Highway 18. Stop controlled intersection at Navajo Rd, all rest of the intersections are side street stop controlled.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 48 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 37ţ 46 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 43 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Kiowa Road maintain at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/23/2022 08/24/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 298 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϭϴ
RTE# 2295
Mondamon Road
Highway 18
Apple Valley Road
Major Collector
NB/SB

0.52 Mile
Varies
2 28-35 Feet
Yes
45 MPH
40 MPH
42 38
08/16/2022
33 - 42 5%
87%
8%
250 ft. South of Chapae Ln
2,934 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 5.99
1 0
0 0
2 1
7 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway is narrow with one northbound lane and one southbound lane. Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided along the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

Stop controlled at Highway 18 and signal-controlled intersection at Apple Valley Road. The rest of the intersections are side street stop controlled. Double yellow centerline striping throughout the segment.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 42 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 33ţ 42 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Mondamon Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 299 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϭϵ
RTE# 2295
Navajo Road
Bear Valley Road
Ottawa Road
Minor Arterial
NB/SB

1.50 Mile
N/A
2 72 Feet
Yes
50 MPH
50 MPH
51 46
08/10/2022
42 - 51 9%
80%
11%
160 ft. North of Navajo Pl
12,857 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 1.28
1 0
2 0
2 1
13 0
5 0
0 0
3 2
1 0
The roadway has two northbound lanes and two southbound lanes with a median divider from Bear Valley Road to Sioux Road. Bike lanes are not provided. Curb & gutter, and sidewalks are provided along both side of the roadway.

The adjacent land uses are residential, commercial, and school (Apple Valley Education Center). Single and multi-family housing with many private driveways along west sides of the roadway.

Signal-controlled intersections at Bear valley Rd, Pahute Rd, and Nisqually Rd. Side street stop controlled intersections at Sioux Rd, Navajo Way, Nisqually Rd, Ojai Rd, Clallam Rd, and Ottawa Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 51 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 42ţ 51 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 46 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Navajo Road be set at 50 MPH in both directions.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the posted 50 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 300 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϮϬ
RTE# 2295
Navajo Road
Ottawa Road
Highway 18
Minor Arterial
NB/SB

1.50 Mile
N/A
2 72 Feet
Yes
40 MPH
40 MPH
41 36
08/10/2022
32 - 41 14%
74%
12%
190 ft. North of Powhatan Rd
14,022 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 1.13
6 0
1 0
3 2
13 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
The roadway has two northbound lanes and two southbound lanes with median divider. Bike lanes are not provided.

Curb & gutter, and sidewalks are provided along both side of the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential and commercial. Single and multi-family housing with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway. There is a public park with a playground on the east side at Powhatan with commercial land use to Highway 18.

Signal-controlled intersections at southerly Powhatan Rd, and Highway 18. All-way stop controlled intersection at Outer Highway 18 S. Side street stop controlled intersections at Ottawa Rd and at northerly Powhatan Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 41 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32ţ 41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 36 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Navajo Road to remain at 40 MPH in both directions.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 301 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
Ϯϭ
RTE# 2295
Otoe Road
Rancherias Road
Dale Evans Parkway
Major Collector
EB/WB

0.93 Miles
N/A
2 26 Feet
N/A
50 MPH
50 MPH
54 47
11/22/2022
41 -51 5%
83%
12%
70 ft. West of Sago Rd
1,290 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 3.04
0 0
1 1
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one westbound lane and one eastbound lane with 20 feet shoulders on both side. Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway has a slight up slope on the west going down eastbound. All intersections are side street stop controlled. No centerline striping on road.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 54 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 41ţ 51 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 47 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Otoe Road be set at 50 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the posted 50 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
09/13/2022 09/14/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 302 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϮϮ
RTE# 2295
Ottawa Road
Rincon Road
Kiowa Road
Major Collector
EB/WB

0.97 Miles
N/A
2 25 Feet
N/A
40 MPH
40 MPH
40 37
11/22/2022
31 - 40
85%
160 ft. East of Quapaw Rd
1,135 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 3.32
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
3 0
0 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane with 10 to 15 feet shoulders on both side. Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is flat with two reverse curves between Shawnee Rd to Quapaw Rd and Skiomah Rd to Jicarilla Rd.

All-way stop controlled intersection at Kiowa Rd. Rest of intersections are side street stop controlled. Intersection ahead warning sign on both sides approaching Quapaw Rd. Curve warning signs at both approaches east and west of Topsanna Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 40 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 31ţ40 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 37 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Ottawa Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change in speed from the posted 40 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/23/2022 08/24/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset 1%
14%

22

/Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
Ϯϯ
RTE# 2295
Ottawa Road
Kiowa Road
Navajo Road
Major Collector
EB/WB

0.5 Mile
N/A
2 24 - 64 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
45 MPH
48 40
08/10/2022
35 - 44 9%
58%
33%
190 ft. West of Tutelo Rd
2,304 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 6.34
1 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
2 0
1 1
2 1
0 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane with 18 feet shoulders on both side. Bike lanes are not provided along the roadway. Curb & Gutter and sidewalks are provided on both side of the roadway only from 330 feet east of Lakota Rd to 180 feet west of Mohawk Rd. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is straight. All-way stop controlled intersection at Kiowa Rd. Rest of intersections are side street stop controlled. Centerline median striping at the fully improved section only from 330 feet east of Lakota Rd to 180 feet west of Mohawk Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 48 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 35ţ 44 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 40 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Ottawa Road remains at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 305 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
Ϯϰ
RTE# 2295
Rancherias Road
Flathead Road
Yucca Loma Road
Major Collector
NB/SB

1.20 Miles
N/A
2 27 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
45 MPH
44 41
09/01/2022
37 - 46 7%
91%
2%
370 ft. South of Kiowa Rd
1,399 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 3.26
2 1
0 0
0 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one northbound lane and one southbound lane with 10 to 15 feet shoulders on both side. Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided along the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential.

Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is flat and straight. All intersections are side street stop controlled. Intersection of Rancherias Rd and Yucca Loma Rd is within the Yucca Loma Elementary school zone.

Centerline skip striping all along this segment.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 44 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 37ţ 46 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 41 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Rancherias Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/23/2022 08/24/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 306 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
Ϯϱ
RTE# 2295
Rancherias Road
Highway 18
Flathead Road
Major Collector
NB/SB

2.0 Miles
N/A
2 24 - 28 Feet
N/A
35 MPH
35 MPH
41 38
09/20/2022
34 - 43 3%
92%
5%
100 ft. South of Chickasaw Rd
782 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 9.34
4 0
2 1
2 2
2 0
6 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one northbound lane and one southbound lane with 10 to 15 feet shoulders on both side. Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided along the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential.

Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is sloping down from north to south with multiple reverse curves and limited sight distance. Signal-controlled intersection at Highway 18. Rest of intersections are side street stop controlled.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 41 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 34ţ 43 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Rancherias Road remains at 35 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/23/2022 08/24/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 307 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
Ϯϲ
RTE# 2295
Rimrock Road E.

Highway 18
Rancherias Road
Local
EB/WB

0.53 Miles
N/A
2 23 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
45 MPH
51 44
09/14/2022
40 - 49 13%
68%
19%
1,000 ft. East of Serrano Rd
1,654 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 13.54
1 0
3 1
1 1
4 0
0 0
2 1
1 0
1 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane with 10 feet shoulders on both side. Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided along the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is narrow and flat with no striping. Serrano Road, the only side street, is stop controlled.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 51 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 40ţ 49 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 44 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Rimrock Road be maintained at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/30/2022 08/31/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Outer Highway 18 North

/Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
Ϯϳ
RTE# 2295
Rincon Road
Sitting Bull Road
Rancherias Road
Major Collector
NB/SB

2.41 Miles
N/A
2 24 - 35 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
40 MPH
43 38
08/18/2022
33 - 42 8%
75%
17%
390 ft. South of Nowata Rd
4,568 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 0.91
0 0
4 1
1 1
4 0
1 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one northbound lane and one southbound lane with 15 feet shoulders on both side from Sitting Bull Rd to 164 feet north of Nowata Rd and from 190 feet north of Ochoa Rd to Rancherias Rd. Bike lanes are not provided on both side of the roadway. curb & gutter and sidewalks are only provided on the east side of the roadway from 164 feet north of Nowata Rd to 190 feet north of Ochoa Rd. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is narrow with centerline and edge of pavement striping. All intersections are side street stop controlled.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 43 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 33ţ 42 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Rincon Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/23/2022 08/24/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 309 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
Ϯϴ
RTE# 2295
Riverside Drive
Sahale Lane
Mingo Road
Local
NB/SB

0.85 Miles
N/A
2 25 - 32 Feet
N/A
40 MPH
40 MPH
41 38
09/20/2022
32 - 41 8%
84%
8%
100 ft. North of Hiouchi Rd
1,184 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 0.91
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one northbound lane and one southbound lane. Bike lanes are not provided on both side of the roadway.Parallel street parking, curb & gutter, and sidewalks (full improvements) are provided on both side of the roadway only from Sahale Ln to Shoshonee Rd. Then 10 to 20 feet shoulders are provided on both side from Shoshonee Rd to Mingo Rd.

The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway has 4% down slope from north to south with multiple reverse curves occur. No edge line striping but double yellow centerline striping is provided. All intersections are side street stop controlled.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 40 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32ţ 41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 38 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Riverside Drive be maintained at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/23/2022 08/24/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 310 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
Ϯϴ
RTE# 2295
Riverside Drive
Mingo Road
Tacony Road
Major Collector
EB/WB

1.0 Mile
N/A
2 25 - 32 Feet
N/A
40 MPH
40 MPH
40 37
08/17/2022
32 - 41 8%
86%
6%
100 ft. West of Riverside Rd
914 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 5.00
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
2 2
0 0
The roadway has one northbound lane and one southbound lane with 10 to 20 feet shoulder on both side. Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided along the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential.

Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway has 4% down slope from north to south with multiple reverse curves. No edge line striping but centerline striping is provided. All intersections are side street stop controlled.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 40 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32ţ 41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 37 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Riverside Drive maintain at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 311 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
Ϯϴ
RTE# 2295
Riverside Drive
Tacony Road
Branding Iron Road
Major Collector
EB/WB

0.65 Miles
N/A
2 25 - 32 Feet
N/A
40 MPH
40 MPH
38 34
08/17/2022
29 - 38 3%
86%
11%
60 ft. West of Riverside Ln
761 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 1.85
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one northbound lane and one southbound lane. 10 to 15 feet shoulders are provided on both side from Tacony Rd to 320 feet north of Symeron Rd. Curb & gutter on both side from 320 feet north of Symeron Rd to Branding Iron Rd. Bike lanes are not provided on both side of the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential.

Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway has 4% down slope from north to south. No edge line striping, but centerline striping is provided. All intersections are side street stop controlled.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 38 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 29ţ 38 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 34 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Riverside Drive maintain at 40 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 312 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
Ϯϵ
RTE# 2295
Seneca Road
Apple Valley Road
Rancherias Road
Major Collector
EB/WB

1.39 Miles
N/A
2 24 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
45 MPH
44 41
08/18/2022
36 - 45 8%
87%
5%
150 ft. West of Cronese Rd
1,645 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 1.20
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
2 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane with 10 to 15 feet shoulders on both side. Bike lanes, Curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided along the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential.

Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is sloping up hill from west to east. There are two vertical curves east of Apple Valley Road and a horizontal curve west of Rancherias Road. Signal-controlled intersection at Apple Valley Rd.

All-way stop controlled intersection at Rincon Rd. Rest of intersections are side street stop controlled.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 44 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 36ţ 45 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 41 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Seneca Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/23/2022 08/24/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 313 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϯϬ
RTE# 2295
Shoshonee Road
Apple Valley Road
Seminole Road
Major Collector
EB/WB

1.58 Miles
N/A
2 24 - 28 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
40 MPH
43 39
08/18/2022
34 - 43 5%
85%
10%
175 ft. West of Rincon Rd
1,570 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 0.37
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane with 10 to 15 feet shoulders on both side. Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided along the roadway. Asphalt berms are provided on both side of the roadway from Apple Valley Rd to Pamlico Rd. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is slightly sloping up hill from west to east. Multiple reverse curves occur along the roadway. Striping is not provided. Signal-controlled intersection at Apple Valley Rd. All-way stop controlled intersection at Rincon Rd. Rest of intersections are side street stop controlled.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 43 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 34ţ 43 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 39 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Shoshonee Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/23/2022 08/24/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 314 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϯϭ
RTE# 2295
Sitting Bull Road
Apple Valley Road
Rincon Road
Major Collector
EB/WB

1.0 Miles
N/A
2 - 3
25 - 64 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
45 MPH
53 47
11/22/2022
43 - 53 10%
83%
7%
410 ft. West of Choco Rd
6,607 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 0.97
3 2
1 0
1 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has two eastbound lanes and one westbound lane from Topsham Bay to Paraiso Rd, fully improved, curb & gutter and sidewalks are provided on both side along that section. Rest of the roadway east to Rincon has one lane on each direction with centerline striping and 10 to 15 feet shoulders on each side. Bike lanes are not provided. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along the north side of the roadway.

The roadway is straight and has a variable 4% downgrade west of Rincon Rd. to Apple Valley Rd. Lane merge occurs on westbound before Topsham Bay and eastbound after Paraiso Rd. Signal-controlled intersection at Apple Valley Rd. and Lompoc Rd. Rest of the intersections are side street stop controlled. Sitting Bull Academy School Zone west of Choco Rd. and east of Topsham with 25 MPH school zone signage is installed. Signal controlled intersection at Lompoc Rd. with Yellow Crosswalks.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 53 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 43ţ 53 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 47 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Sitting Bull Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions per the new CVC Section 22358.8(a).This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 315 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϯϮ
RTE# 2295
Sitting Bull Road
Rincon Road
Kiowa Road
Major Collector
EB/WB

1.0 Miles
N/A
2 25 - 60 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
45 MPH
46 44
12/21/2022
39 - 48
81%
510 ft. East of Iroquois Rd
4,908 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 0.56
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane with centerline striping. Two Way Left Turn Lane is provided from Quapaw Rd to Skyline Ranch Dr. Curb & gutter and sidewalks are provided on the south side of the roadway from Quapaw Rd to Nyack Rd. Curb & gutter are provided on both sides from Nyack Rd to Skyline Ranch Dr. Rest of the roadway has 10 to 20 feet shoulders on each side. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway. Existing horizontal curve warning signage with advisory speed plaques in advance of both approaches to the reverse curve.

The roadway has 4% slope up from west to east. All-way stop controlled intersection at Iroquois Rd. and at Kiowa Rd. Rest of intersections are side street stop controlled.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 46 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 39ţ 48 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 44 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Sitting Bull Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents no change from the posted 45 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset 10%
9%

from Rincon Rd. to Kiowa Rd.
32

/Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϯϯ
RTE# 2295
Sitting Bull Road
Kiowa Road
Navajo Road
Major Collector
EB/WB

1.0 Miles
N/A
2 26 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
45 MPH
45 40
08/10/2022
36 - 45 12%
75%
13%
160 ft. East of Waynoka Rd
2,594 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 2.46
1 0
0 0
0 0
3 0
2 1
0 0
0 0
1 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane with 10 to 20 feet shoulders on each side.

Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is flat. No edge lines but skip centerline is provided. Signal-controlled intersection at Navajo Rd. All-way stop controlled intersections at Kiowa Rd and Algonquin Rd. The rest of the intersections are side street stop controlled.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 45 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 36ţ 45 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 40 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Sitting Bull Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 318 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϯϰ
RTE# 2295
Standing Rock Ave
Outer Highway 18 N
Navajo Road
Major Collector
EB/WB

1.39 Miles
N/A
2 24 - 31 Feet
N/A
50 MPH
45 MPH
48 43
09/14/2022
38 - 47 2%
77%
21%
250 ft. East of Cheyenne Rd
1,079 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 4.26
0 0
0 0
0 0
6 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane with 10 to 20 feet shoulders on each side. Bike lanes are not provided. Curb & gutter and sidewalks are provided on the north side of the roadway from Outer Highway 18 N to Blackfoot Rd. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is flat. No striping is provided. All intersections are side street stop controlled with a reverse curve between Gayhead Rd to Navajo Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 48 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 38ţ 47 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 43 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Standing Rock Avenue be set at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6.This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and represents a reduction in speed of 5 MPH from the posted 50 MPH, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 319 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϯϱ
RTE# 2295
Thunderbird Road
Rancherias Road
Dale Evans Parkway
Minor Arterial
EB/WB

1.0 Mile
1 - 2
2 29 - 42 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
45 MPH
46 41
09/13/2022
37 - 46 4%
86%
10%
520 ft. East of Wanaque Rd
5,400 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 2.20
0 0
2 0
3 2
4 1
1 1
1 0
0 0
2 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane with two way left turn lane. Bike lanes provided on both directions from Rancherias Rd to Wanaque Rd and from Wichita Rd to Dale Evans Pkwy. Bike lane, curb & gutter, and sidewalk are provided on the north side of the roadway from Wanaque Rd to Wichita Rd. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is flat with multiple horizontal curves. All-way stop controlled intersections at Rancherias Rd and Dale Evans Pkwy. Rest of the intersections are side street stop controlled. Two way left turn lane striping. Intersection of Thunderbird Rd and Wichita Rd is within the Phoenix Academy & Apple Valley Center for Innovation school zone.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 46 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 37ţ 46 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 41 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, no onţstreet parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Thunderbird Road remain at 45 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 320 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϯϲ
RTE# 2295
Thunderbird Road
Dale Evans Parkway
Navajo Road
Minor Arterial
EB/WB

1.0 Mile
2 2
36 Feet
N/A
50 MPH
50 MPH
55 51
09/13/2022
47 - 56 19%
70%
11%
150 ft. East of Cheyenne Rd
5,768 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 1.27
0 0
0 0
2 1
2 0
3 1
0 0
0 0
1 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane with 10 feet shoulders on each side. Bike lanes are provided on both directions. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is flat and straight. All-way stop controlled intersections at Dale Evans Pkwy and Navajo Rd. Rest of the intersections are side street stop controlled. Yellow skip centerline striping.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 55 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 47ţ 56 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 51 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, no onţstreet parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Thunderbird Road remain at 50 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/30/2022 08/31/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 321 of 530 DIRECTION: NO. OF LANES:

LENGTH: ROADWAY WIDTH:

BIKE LANES: MEDIAN:

POSTED SPEED LIMIT:

RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
10 MPH PACE: PERCENT UNDER PACE:

PERCENT IN PACE:

PERCENT OVER PACE:

HEAD-ON SIDESWIPE REAR-END BROADSIDE HIT OBJECT OVERTURN OTHER W/ PED-BIKE DATE
** SOURCE:

ACTUAL ACCIDENT RATE:

RCE
*California Road System Functional Classification
AVERAGE DAILY VOLUME:

LOCATION OF VEHICLE COUNTERS:

COUNT DATE:

TOTAL:

SPEED RELATED:
85TH PERCENTILE:
50TH PERCENTILE:

RADAR SURVEY DATE:

ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

PERIOD TO:

COLLISION TYPE:

VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

PERIOD FROM: STATEWIDE AVERAGE ACCIDENT RATE**:

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:

STREET NAME:

FROM:

TO:

CA CLASSIFICATION*:
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϯϳ
RTE# 2295
Tomahawk Road
Rancherias Road
Mandan Road
Major Collector
EB/WB

1.1 Mile
N/A
2 24 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
45 MPH
48 43
08/18/2022
38 - 47 11%
72%
17%
90 ft. East of Pamlico Rd
3,459 ADT 08/30/2022
2019
2021

1.08 1.20
0 0
0 0
3 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
1 1
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane with 10 feet shoulders on each side.

Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided along the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

Multiple vertical curves occur along the roadway with a horizontal curve between Chickasaw Rd and Rancherias Rd. Reverse curve between Choctaw Rd and Mandan Rd. No edge line but double yellow centerline striping is provided. All intersections are side street stop controlled. Not a truck route signage. Golf Cart Crossing west of Chickasaw Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 48 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 38ţ 47 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 43 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no onţstreet parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Tomahawk Road remain at 45 MPH in both directions per the new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/31/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 322 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϯϴ
RTE# 2295
Tuscola Road
Apple Valley Road
Nokomis Road
Local
NB/SB

1.12 Mile
N/A
2 24 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
40 MPH
40 37
08/17/2022
32 - 41 2%
93%
5%
95 ft. South of Hiawatha Rd
623 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 7.85
1 0
3 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway is flat, it has one northbound lane and one southbound lane with 10 to 20 feet shoulders on each side. Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided along the roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family homes with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is flat with some horizontal curves. Signal-controlled intersection at Apple Valley Rd. All-way stop controlled intersection at Symeron Rd. Rest of the intersections are side street stop controlled.

Intersection of Tuscola Rd and Symeron Rd is within the school zone for Desert Knolls Elementary School.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 40 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 32ţ 41 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 37 MPH. Based on the review of study data, roadway width, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets and signal-controlled intersection, field observations, roadway topography, near to school (Desert Knolls Elementary) and marked School crosswalks at Symeron Rd., residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Tuscola Road be set at 40 MPH in both directions.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 323 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϯϵ
RTE# 2295
Yucca Loma Road
Kiowa Road
Navajo Road
Minor Arterial
EB/WB

1.0 Mile
N/A
2 29 - 74 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
45 MPH
51 46
09/01/2022
42 - 51 7%
80%
13%
370 ft. East of Kiowa Rd
4,085 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 2.01
1 0
2 1
0 0
6 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane. Bike lanes are not provided. Asphalt sidewalk is provided on the south side from Kiowa Rd to Lakota Rd and from Rancherias Rd to Algonquin Rd. Curb & gutter and sidewalk are provided on the south side from Lakota Rd to Rancherias Rd and from Algonquin Rd to Navajo Rd. The adjacent land uses are residential, Commercial, and Yucca Loma Elementary school crosswalks at Rancherias Rd. Many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is flat and straight. All-way stop controlled intersections at Kiowa Rd and Navajo Rd.

Rest of intersections are side street stop controlled. Intersection of Yucca Loma Rd and Rancherias Rd is within the school zone. "No Trucks Over 5 Tons" signage. Bus Stops along the segment.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 51 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 42ţ 51 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 46 MPH. Based on the review of study data, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled intersections, field observations, roadway topography, no onţstreet parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Yucca Loma Road remain at 45 MPH in both directions per new CVC Section 22358.6. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed, and represents no change from the previous posted speed limit.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
08/16/2022 08/17/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 324 of 530 /Z
d/KE͗ EK͘K&>E
^͗
>
E'd,͗ ZKtzt/d,͗
/<
>E
^͗ D
/E͗
WK^d
^W

>/D/d͗
Z
KDD
E
^W

>/D/d͗
ϭϬDW,W
͗ W
Z
EdhE
ZW
͗
W
Z
Ed/EW
͗
W
Z
EdKs
ZW
͗
,
ͲKE ^/
^t/W
Z
ZͲ
E ZK^/
,/dK:
d Ks
ZdhZE Kd,
Z tͬW
Ͳ/<

d

ΎΎ^KhZ
͗
dh>/
EdZd
͗
Z

ΎĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂZŽĂĚ^LJƐƚĞŵ&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
s
Z'
/>zsK>hD
͗
>Kd/KEK&s
,/>
KhEd
Z^͗
KhEdd
͗
dKd>͗
^W

Z
>d
͗
ϴϱd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ϱϬd,W
Z
Ed/>
͗
ZZ^hZs
zd
͗
ROADSIDE FACTORS:

OTHER FACTORS:

RECOMMENDATIONS:

CERTIFICATION:

W
Z/KdK͗
K>>/^/KEdzW
͗
VEHICLE COUNTS:

COLLISION HISTORY:

W
Z/K&ZKD͗ ^dd
t/
s
Z'
/
EdZd
ΎΎ͗

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
PREVAILING SPEEDS:
^dZ

dED
͗
&ZKD͗
dK͗
>^^/&/d/KEΎ͗
/͕ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ ĚŽ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ Ăůů ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ dŽǁŶ ŽĨ ƉƉůĞ sĂůůĞLJ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ǁĞƌĞ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌ ŵLJ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͘ / ĐĞƌƚŝĨLJ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚŝƐ ƐƵƌǀĞLJ ŝƐ ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ sĞŚŝĐůĞ ŽĚĞ ϲϮϳ ĂŶĚ ĂůƐŽ ƚŚĞ ŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ϮϬϭϰ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂů ŽŶ hŶŝĨŽƌŵ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĞǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ZĞǀŝƐŝŽŶ ϲ ĞĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘ / Ăŵ ĚƵůLJ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĂƐĂWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͘
Ͳ
ϰϬ
RTE# 2295
Zuni Road
Rancherias Road
Dale Evans Parkway
Major Collector
EB/WB

1.0 Mile
N/A
2 24 Feet
N/A
45 MPH
45 MPH
45 42
09/14/2022
36 - 45 0%
87%
13%
450 ft. East of Serrano Rd
1,653 ADT
2019
2021

1.08 7.18
1 0
1 0
0 0
10 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
The roadway has one eastbound lane and one westbound lane with 10 to 20 feet shoulders on both side. Bike lanes, curb & gutter, and sidewalks are not provided. The adjacent land uses are residential. Single family house with many private driveways along both sides of the roadway.

The roadway is narrow, flat, and straight. No edge line or centerline striping is provided. All intersections are side street controlled. School Zone crossings at Wichita Rd.

The observed 85th percentile speed is 45 MPH. The 10 MPH Pace Speed is between 36ţ 45 MPH. The 50th percentile speed is 42 MPH. Based on the review of study data, roadway width, existing roadway geometry with stop controlled side streets, field observations, roadway topography, no onţstreet parking, residential density, engineering judgment, and guidelines set forth in the CA-MUTCD, it is recommended that the appropriate speed limit for this segment of Zuni Road be set at 45 MPH in both directions. This is consistent with the 85th percentile speed, and is within the 10 MPH Pace Speed.

ALI MATEEN SHAHZAD
09/13/2022 09/14/2022
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2019 - 2021 Dataset Page 325 of 530 Appendix B
Map of Existing and Recommended
Speed Limits

Appendix C
Traffic Count Sheets

Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Apple Valley
Date: Project #: CA22_030036_001

NB SB EB WB
750 625 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 0 0 0 0  8 8 0 0 16
00:15 1 1 0 0 28 9 0 0 17
00:30 0 0 0 0 10 7 0 0 17
00:45 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 3 5 31 16 40 0 0 21 71
01:00 1 1 0 0 2 21 25 0 0 46
01:15 1 2 0 0 3 27 15 0 0 42
01:30 1 1 0 0 218 10 0 0 28
01:45 2 5 0 4 0 0 2 9 15 81 15 65 0 0 30 146
02:00 0 0 0 0  18 10 0 0 28
02:15 0 0 0 0  20 12 0 0 32
02:30 1 1 0 0 2 12 18 0 0 30
02:45 2 3 2 3 0 0 4 6 7 57 24 64 0 0 31 121
03:00 0 2 0 0 2 17 10 0 0 27
03:15 0 2 0 0 2 17 11 0 0 28
03:30 0 2 0 0 2 10 16 0 0 26
03:45 1 1 4 10 0 0 5 11 20 64 11 48 0 0 31 112
04:00 1 2 0 0 3 17 10 0 0 27
04:15 3 2 0 0 5 19 14 0 0 33
04:30 1 2 0 0 3 14 15 0 0 29
04:45 3 8 3 9 0 0 6 17 9 59 8 47 0 0 17 106
05:00 3 1 0 0 4 10 12 0 0 22
05:15 5 7 0 0 12 10 5 0 0 15
05:30 9 17 0 0 26 16 8 0 0 24
05:45 19 36 16 41 0 0 35 77 13 49 13 38 0 0 26 87
06:00 16 7 0 0 23 11 7 0 0 18
06:15 7 7 0 0 14 7 8 0 0 15
06:30 10 8 0 0 18 15 11 0 0 26
06:45 14 47 9 31 0 0 23 78 16 49 6 32 0 0 22 81
07:00 7 6 0 0 13 12 3 0 0 15
07:15 8 9 0 0 17 5 8 0 0 13
07:30 7 7 0 0 14 6 4 0 0 10
07:45 7 29 6 28 0 0 13 57 9 32 5 20 0 0 14 52
08:00 8 12 0 0 20 9 9 0 0 18
08:15 7 4 0 0 11 10 4 0 0 14
08:30 5 4 0 0 9 2 6 0 0 8
08:45 7 27 8 28 0 0 15 55 8 29 6 25 0 0 14 54
09:00 5 10 0 0 15 2 4 0 0 6
09:15 9 11 0 0 20 4 1 0 0 5
09:30 9 3 0 0 12 1 1 0 0 2
09:45 12 35 5 29 0 0 17 64 5 12 0 6 0 0 5 18
10:00 12 6 0 0 18 3 1 0 0 4
10:15 6 10 0 0 16 3 1 0 0 4
10:30 7 6 0 0 13 4 0 0 0 4
10:45 6 31 8 30 0 0 14 61 5 15 1 3 0 0 6 18
11:00 12 5 0 0 17 2 0 0 0 2
11:15 9 6 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 1
11:30 8 7 0 0 15 4 0 0 0 4
11:45 11 40 4 22 0 0 15 62 1 8 1 1 0 0 2 9
TOTALS 264 236 500 486 389 875
SPLIT % 52.8% 47.2% 36.4% 55.5% 44.5% 63.6%

NB SB EB WB
750 625 0 0
AM Peak Hour 05:45 05:15 05:30 13:00 12:45 13:00
AM Pk Volume 52 47 98 81 66 146
Pk Hr Factor 0.684 0.691 0.700 0.750 0.660 0.793
7Ͳ9 Volume 56 56 00 112 108 85 00 193
7Ͳ9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 16:00 16:15 16:00
7Ͳ9 Pk Volume 30 34 0 0 64 59 49 0 0 106
Pk Hr Factor 0.938 0.708 0.000 0.000 0.800 0.776 0.817 0.000 0.000 0.803 Pk Hr Factor
4Ͳ6 Volume
4Ͳ6 Peak Hour
4Ͳ6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor

DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,375
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Algonquin Rd Bet. Bear Valley Rd & Sitting Bull Rd
Tuesday
8/16/2022
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,375