Item 08b - Arcadia Housing Element Update — Arcadia City Council, February 15, 2022 (part 5 of 5)

caregivers, property caretakers, and public occupations. Therefore, job availability would not be readily affected by the implementation of th e Project and would not lead to unexpected population growth.

As a component of Statewide housing legislatio n, any housing growth and population growth associated with the Project would be in acco rdance with State-level regulation and would therefore not be considered unplanned. Additionally, future housing development facilitated by the HEU would occur in urbanized locations near existing utilities and service systems, and areas already served by public services (e.g., po lice and fire protection, and other emergency responders).

Future housing development would be subject to discretionary permits and would be assessed on a case-by-case basis for potential effects concerning population growth. Additionally, future housing development would be subject to co mpliance with all Federal, State, and local requirements for minimizing growth-related impacts. Local requirements include those Stated in the Arcadia GP and Arcadia MC.

As discussed throughout this IS/ND, all future housing development facilitated by the HEU would be subject to the City’s development review pr ocess, which may include environmental review under CEQA, and would be assessed on a project-by-project basis for potential effects concerning population growth. Additionally, future housin g development would be subject to compliance with all federal, State, and local requirements for minimizing growth-related impacts. Therefore, the HEU would not induce substantial unplanne d population growth in the City directly or indirectly, a less than significant impact would occur. b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Less Than significant Impact. Senate Bill (SB) 166 (2017) requires a City or County to ensure that its Housing Element inventory can accommodate its share of the regional housing need throughout the planning period. It prohibits a City or County from reducing, requiring, or permitting the reduction of the residential densit y to a lower residential density than what was utilized by the HCD for certification of the Housing Element, unless the City or County makes written findings supported by substantial evidence that the reduction is consistent with the adopted General Plan, including the Housing Elem ent. The City has identified sites which can meet the 1,672 unit low and very-low income RHNA need and can also accommodate a three percent buffer for those income categories, as demonstrated in Table 7. The City understands that should a “No Net Loss” scenario occur during the 2021-2029 planning period and they will be required to identify additional sites to acco mmodate any shortfall of capacity should that scenario occur. Therefore, the HEU’s potential impacts, including from future development facilitated by the HEU, concerning displacement of existing people or housing, and need to construct replacement housing elsewhere would be less than significant.

Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 99 ends

Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 100 ends

XV. Public Services
Would the Project:
a. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities or need for new or physical altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for fire protection?
Less Than Significant Impact . The Project is a policy document and would not result in direct housing construction but would facilitate and provide a policy framework for future housing development throughout the City. Future housing development facilitated by the Project would increase demand for fire protection services over time. Fire protection services are provided by the Arcadia Fire Department. The Arcadia Fire Department would continue to provide services to the future housing developments facilitated by the Project.

Future development in the Arcadia Golf Course would incrementally increase the demand for fire protection services to area. However, the proposed golf course site is already being serviced by existing infrastructure (e.g., roads and utilit ies) and already served by the Arcadia Fire Department.

All future housing development facilitated by the HEU would be subject to development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with GP Goal S- 5 and Policies S-5.1 through S-5.12 and to adhere to the 2019 California Fire Code and Arcadia MC §3122.7 (Fire Code). Future projects would al so be subject to impact fees and tax revenue will be generated from their development. These sources of revenue will support public goods, like fire protection services, to continue and improve. Future proj ects will also incorporate fire preventative designs and will provide access for emergency services. The Project’s impact on fire protection is anticipated to be less than significant.
b. Result in substantial adverse physical impact s associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities or need for new or physical altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for police protection?
Less Than Significant Impact . The City receives police protection services through the Arcadia Police Department. Future residential-based Projects may slightly increase demand of protective services, but it is not expected to negatively impact the ability of the police department to provide services to the City. Similar to fire serv ices, the identified focus areas are in urbanized locations near existing infrastructure (e.g., ro ads and utilities) and would be located near areas already served by the Arcadia Police Department.

Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 101 ends

As well, the addition of future development will pay development fees, as well as continued tax revenue that will support public services, such as the police officers, facilities, and supplies. All future housing development facilitated by the HEU would be subject to development review process, which may include review pursuant to CEQA, and be required to comply with GP Goal S-5 and Policies S-5.1 through S-5.12. Therefore, the Housing Element would result in a less than significant impact on police protective services.
c. Result in substantial adverse physical impact s associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities or need for new or physical altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for schools?
Less Than Significant Impact. As previously noted, the project would not result in direct housing construction, but would facilitate future housing development. Future housing development facilitated by the HEU and the resulting unplanned population growth of approximately 13,205 persons and could generate student population growth in Arcadia Unified School District (AUSD).

The student population growth would increase the demand for school services. Any future housing development facilitated by the HEU would be required to comply with Senate Bill (SB) 50 requirements, which allow school districts to collect impact fees from developers of new residential projects to offset the cost of ne w development. Because th e construction of new school facilities to serve the future housing development facilitated by the HEU is not included in the Project, no physical impacts in this regard . Less than significant impact is anticipated to concerning construction of school facilities.
d. Result in substantial adverse physical impact s associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities or need for new or physical altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for parks?
Less Than Significant Impact. Please refer to Section XVI: Recreation below. e. Result in substantial adverse physical impact s associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities or need for new or physical altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for other public facilities?
Less Than Significant Impact. As previously noted, the project would not result in direct housing construction, but would facilitate future housing development. Future housing development facilitated by the HEU and the resulting unplanned population growth of approximately 13,205 and would incrementally increase the demand for library facilities. Any future housing development facilitated by the HEU would occur in urbanized locations near existing facilities Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 102 ends

that currently provide service to these areas. Therefore, it is anticipated that the increased demand would not be substantial or such that it would warrant construction of a new facility.

Although future Projects may increase demands on library facilities, demand would be at least partially offset by funding generated by development fees and by tax revenue of higher numbers of residents. Therefore, the HEU would not re sult in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new library facilities. Impacts would be less than significant.

Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 103 ends

XVI. Recreation
Would the Project:
a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less than Significant Impact. The Project is a policy document and would not directly impact recreation for the City of Arcadia. Future resi dential projects may induce increased demand of parks and other recreational facilities. It is possible that future developments will include the construction of additional recreational facilities and developer-produced parks, but it is presently unknown until future housing projects are prop osed. Future development facilitated by the Project would be required to pay development im pact fees and any tax revenue generated will benefit the funding for parks and facilities to offset potential increases in demand.

The City of Arcadia offers a variety of recreational parks and facilities. Arcadia has mini- park/pocket parks, neighborhood parks, community parks joint use parks and facilities, and County parks and facilities. As of Arcadia’s 2010 General Plan, Arcadia has a total of 32 parks, excluding 7 recreational facilities. Arcadia has a standard ratio of 2.43 acres of parks per 1,000 residents. This ratio is used for park dedication and fee requirements. The built-out nature of Arcadia’s environment makes it challenging to find opportunities for more recreational facilities.

According to the recommendations from the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA), a park should cover a ¼ to ½ mile service area radius. Arcadia satisfies this recommendation in most cases.
34 Additionally, the HEU’s candidate housing sites are dispersed throughout the community to minimize the potential for adverse changes in the neighborhood character and reduce the potential for adverse impacts on recreation am enities. Adherence to mandatory discretionary permit requirements and regulations for providing recreation would support the City’s goals for providing sufficient recreation opportunities for residents. For these reasons, the HEU and future housing development facilitated by the HEU would not result in substantial physical deterioration of existing neighborhood or regional parks. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b. Include recreational facilities or require th e construction or expa nsion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less than Significant. See answer (a) above. The HEU would not lead to direct impacts, but future projects that may necessitate the expansion of recreational facilities would be required to undergo environmental review and comply with any applicable di scretionary actions related to

34 City of Arcadia. (2010). City of Arcadia General Plan. Pages 7-4 through 7-15. Retrieved from:
https://www.arcadiaca.gov/shape/development_services_department/planning___zoning/general_plan.php#outer-446 Accessed October 12, 2021
Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 104 ends

the expansion of recreational facilities. As the Project does not directly propose the creation, modification, or removal of recreational facilities, a less than significant impact is anticipated.

Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 105 ends

XVII. Transportation
Would the Project:
a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadways, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? Less Than Significant Impact . The Project is a policy document and not result in direct housing construction but would facilitate and provide a policy framework for future housing development throughout the City. Further, the HEU does not include any goals, policies, or implementation programs that would conflict with plans or other regulations that address the circulation system.

Future development projects would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis to ensure consistency with applicable regulations that address the circulation system.

Bus services are provided to the City via th e Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), a public agency that provides services to Los Angeles County. The LACMTA provides six (6) bus routes and four (4) Foothill Transit routes, which primarily serve the commercial areas and corridors in the City. In a ddition, the City also operates Arcadia Transit, which provides a curb-to-curb se rvice in response to individual travel requests. The service is open to the general public and operates to all destinations within the City limits and give (5) designated medical facilities located beyond the City limits. 35 The Metro Gold Line provides light
rail transit services from downtown Los Angeles to the City Azusa, with a stop in the City of Arcadia. The Metro Gold Line currently plans to extend the services from Azusa to Pomona, which is expected to be completed in 2025. Implementation of the Project would not conflict with the service capacity of these transportation providers.

All future housing development facilitated by the HEU would be subject to City’s development review process, which may include environmental review under CEQA, and comply with applicable General Plan, Municipal Code, policies/standards concerning public transit and pedestrian facilities. This includes policies and regulations required to improve public access and safety for people who walk and bike, and improv e the transportation system, as applicable.

Future housing development on the candidate hous ing sites would be required to adhere to all State requirements for consistency with transportation plans.

The City’s review process would examine projec t compatibilities with the surrounding areas.

Conditions of approvals may include requirements for street improvements and dedications and traffic circulation. As a result, future housing development on the candidate housing sites facilitated by the HEU would not conflict with an adopted program, plan, ordinance, or policy

35 City of Arcadia. 2010 General Plan EIR. Retrieved from:
https://cms9files.revize.com/arcadia/Shape%20Arcadia/Development%20Services/eir/Transportation.pdf, Accessed November 2021.

Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 106 ends

addressing the circulation system, including transi t, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
b. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Less Than Significant Impact. Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) was approved by the California legislature in September 2013. SB 743 requires changes to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), specifically directing the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop alternative metrics to the use of vehicular “level of service” (LOS) for evaluating transportation projects. OPR has prepared a technical advisory (“OPR Techni cal Advisory”) for evaluating transportation impacts in CEQA and has recommended that Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) replace LOS as the primary measure of transportation impacts. The Natural Resources Agency has adopted updates to CEQA Guidelines to incorporate SB 743 th at requires use of VMT for the purposes of determining a significant transportation impact under CEQA.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(a) states th at VMT is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. As such, Section 15064.3(b) provides criteria for analyzing transportation impacts. The proposed candidate housing sites could potentially result in increased traffic compared to existing conditions. Trips generated as a result of increased density or new development under the HEU have the potential to increase vehicle miles traveled (VMT) within the City. However, a majority of the proposed candidate housing sites are within urban and developed areas with existing roadways, public transit services, and infrastructures and therefore would not be expected to result in an increase in VMT. Further, future housing development in some areas of the City would provide more housing closer to employment and commercial areas, further increasing opportunities to reduce VMT and increase the ease of walking, cycling, and using public transit.

The HEU would not result in direct housing construction but would facilitate and provide a policy framework for future housing development throughout the City. The candidate housing sites are dispersed throughout the City to reduce the potential for adverse environmental impacts. The intent is to reduce impacts by placing housing near public transportation and recreation opportunities and away from environmentally sensitive resources. Future development projects would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis to ensure consistency with application regulations that address the circulation system, including Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT).

All future housing development facilitated by the HEU would be required to adhere to all State and local requirements for avoiding significan t impacts related to VMT. Any traffic demand measures required for mitigation would be required to comply with Arcadia GP Goals CI-11, CI- 2, and CI-5, which encourage the maintenance of efficient roadway capacities and minimization of traffic hazards near residential uses. A less than significant is anticipated in this regard.

Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 107 ends

c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geomet ric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not result in direct housing construction but would facilitate future housin g development throughout the City. Because future housing development facilitated by the HEU would occur on mostly developed properties use existing roadways that are connected and adjacent to the existing transportation network, hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses are not anticipated. All future housing development facilitated by the HEU would be subject to environmental review under CEQA, the City’s development review process, and be eval uated at the project-level for its potential to increase hazards due to a geometric design feature and to verify compliance with City development requirements within the Arcadia MC.

Future housing development facilitated by the HEU would be required to comply with applicable building and fire safety regulations required for the design of new housing and emergency access; and would be required to adhere to all State and local requirements for avoiding construction and operations impacts related to design and in compatible uses. As a result, future housing development facilitated by the HEU would not su bstantially increase hazards due to design features or incompatible uses. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. d. Result in inadequate emergency access?
Less Than Significant Impact . The project would not result in direct housing construction but would facilitate future housing development throughout the City. Because future housing development facilitated by the HEU would occur on mostly developed properties, it is not anticipated that future housing development would result in inadequate emergency access.

Additionally, all future housing development facilitated by the HEU would be subject to the City’s development review process and required to demonstrate consistency with the Arcadia GP and Arcadia MC.

The City has adopted the California Fire Code (CFC) under Arcadia MC §3122.11. The CFC sets standards for road dimension, design, grades, an d other fire safety features. Additionally, more stringent CBC standards also apply regarding ne w construction and development of emergency access issues associated with earthquakes, flooding, climate/strong winds, and water shortages.

Future housing development would be required to comply with applicable building and fire safety regulations required for the design of new housing and emergency access. Thus, compliance with the Arcadia MC would ensure adequate access is sues, including emergency access. As a result, future housing development facilitated by the HEU would not result in inadequate emergency access. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 108 ends

XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources
Would the Project:
a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or b. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria se t forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall cons ider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

Less Than Significant with Mitigation. Pursuant to Government Code §21080.3.2(b) and §21074(a)(1)(A) -(B) (AB 52] the City has provid ed formal notification to California Native American tribal representatives that have previously requested notification from the City regarding projects within the geographic area trad itionally and culturally affiliated with tribe(s).

Native American groups may have knowledge about cultural resources in the area and may have concerns about adverse effects from development on tribal cultural resources as defined in PRC §21074. To determine whether there are sensitive or sacred Native American resources on or near that site that could be affected by the HEU, the City also requested the NAHC to perform a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search. The NAHC utiliz es the United State Geological Survey (USGS) Geologic Maps as reference for the search. On June 1, 2021, the City received the negative result of the Sacred Lands File (SFL) from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). On June 10, 2021, the City initiated tribal consultation wi th interested California Native American tribes consistent with Assembly Bill (AB) 52 and Senate Bill (SB) 18. No responses were received from any of the California Native American tribe representatives regarding AB 52 and SB 18.

Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 109 ends

XIX. Utilities and Service Systems
Would the Project:
a. Require or result in the relocation or constr uction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Less Than Significant Impact.

Water
The City is the sole provider of water and provides water services to over 50,000 people. The City owns and operates its water distribution system through the Public works Services Department.

The Project would not result in direct housing construction but would facilitate and provide a policy framework for future housing developm ent throughout the City. Future housing development facilitated by the HEU would be located in developed areas of the City where water infrastructure already exists. Further, most of the candidate housing sites are developed and include existing connections to the District’s system. Accordingly, future housing development facilitated by the HEU is not anticipated to require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities that could cause significant environmental effects.

Notwithstanding, all future housing development facilitated by the HEU would be subject to environmental review under CEQA, the City’s development review process, and required to adhere to General Plan policies and Arcadia MC regulations. A less than significant impact would occur. Water supply is further discussed in impact discussion (b) below.

Wastewater
Future projects may be required to implement at Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to ensure that water quality is not degraded and so that storm water flowing from the site would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements. The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) also has requirements. Wastewater from the City is treated by the Whittier Narrows Water Reclamation Plant (WNWRP), the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant (SJCWRP), and the Joint Water Pollution Cont rol Plant (JWPCP), however, the percentage breakdown between these three plants in treating the City’s wastewater in unknown. The Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) estimates approximately 69 gallons of wastewater is generated per person per day within LACSD’s service area. Based on a 2020 population of 53,998 within the City, the estimated amount of wastewater collected within the City’s service area is approximately 3.7 million gallons (MG) per day (or approximately 4,200 AFY). 36 The City is

36 City of Arcadia. (2021). Final 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Page 6-40 through 6-41. Retrieved from:
https://cms9files.revize.com/arcadia/Shape%20Arcadia/Public%20Works%20Services%20Department/Water%20&%20Sewer%20Services/Fi nal%202020%20UWMP.pdf (Accessed November 10, 2021)
Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 110 ends

expected to be able to accommodate future projects, such as those proposed under the Project.

Impacts are less than significant. Wastewater capacity is further discussed in impact (c) below.

Dry Utilities
Southern California Edison (SCE) provides electricity and Southern California Gas Company (SoCal Gas) services gas utilities. Telecommunications service is provided by AT&T.37 The project would not result in direct housing construction but would facilitate future housing development throughout the City. The housing development facilitated by the HUE would increase the demands for dry utilities. However, the candidat e housing sites are located in developed areas of the City that are already served by electr ic power, natural gas, and telecommunications facilities. Further, most of the candidate housing sites are developed and connect to existing dry utility infrastructure. While future development facilitated by the HEU would increase population within the City and increase service demand, growth projections are consistent with regional and local plans used to guide infrastructure development. All future housing development facilitated by the HEU would be required to meet the mand atory requirements under the City’s various programs aimed at ensuring adequate supplies a nd service infrastructure are available to serve the development. A less than significant impact would occur. b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years? Less Than Significant Impact. According to the 2021 City of Arcadia Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), the City’s per capita water usage rate is approximately 230 gallons per day (gpd).38 The Project would therefore generate a demand of 3,992,800 gpd or approximately 4,428 acre- feet (AF) of water per year (AFY). This would constitute approximately 32 percent of the current water demand of 13,935 AF. 39 During dry years, City is able to source water from the Raymond Basin Area and the Main Basin Area. As well, the City’s diverse water supply (imported water, surface water, and groundwater) is anticipated to provide an adequate water supply through 5 dry years. 40 Because the Project is a required component of Statewide planning efforts, the increased water demands, and supply would be increased as a result. Notwithstanding, all future housing development facilitated by the HEU woul d be subject to environmental review under

37 City of Arcadia. (2010). Arcadia General Plan Update Draft Program EIR. Page 4.16-1. Retrieved from:
https://www.arcadiaca.gov/shape/development_services_department/planning___zoning/general_plan.php#outer-708 38 City of Arcadia. (2021). Final 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Page 4-13. Retrieved from:
https://cms9files.revize.com/arcadia/Shape%20Arcadia/Public%20Works%20Services%20Department/Water%20&%20Sewer%20Services/Fi nal%202020%20UWMP.pdf (Accessed November 10, 2021)
39 City of Arcadia. (2020). City of Arcadia 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Retrieved from:
https://www.arcadiaca.gov/Shape%20Arcadia/Public%20Works%20Services%20Department/Water%20&%20Sewer%20Services/Final%2020 20%20UWMP.pdf Accessed October 12, 2021
40 City of Arcadia. (2021). Final 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Page 7-6. Retrieved from:
https://cms9files.revize.com/arcadia/Shape%20Arcadia/Public%20Works%20Services%20Department/Water%20&%20Sewer%20Services/Fi nal%202020%20UWMP.pdf (Accessed November 10, 2021)
Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 111 ends

CEQA, the City’s development review process, an d required to adhere to General Plan policies and Arcadia MC regulations. A less than significant impact would occur.

Stormwater
Implementation of future projects will likely requ ire the construction of storm drainages to tie into existing stormwater drainage facilities within existing rights-of-way. Water discharged from the site will not negatively affect off-site or downstream flows. See Hydrology and Water Quality Impact (a) for further discussion. Impacts are to be considered less than significant. c. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Less Than Significant Impact. The City is served by the Whittier Narrows Water Reclamation Plant (WNWRP), the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant (SJCWRP), and the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant (JWPCP), however, the percentage breakdown between these three plants in treating the City’s wastewater in unknown. LACSD estimates approximately 69 gallons of wastewater is generated per person per day within LACSD’s service area. Based on a 2020 population of 53,998 within the City, the estima ted amount of wastewater collected within the City’s service area is approx imately 3.7 million gallons (MG) per day (or approximately 4,200 AFY).41
Future housing development under the HEU would be subject to discretionary permits and required to adhere to all federal, State, and local requirements related to wastewater treatment during construction and operations, including the City’s Sewer System guidelines (Arcadia MC Chapter 4) and required construction permits. Considering these requirements, and the available capacity discussed above, the project would not result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that it has inadequate capaci ty to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments. No new expansions of infrastructure facilities are required, and impacts would be less than significant. No direct physical impact to the environment would occur.
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less Than Significant Impact . Trash and recycling services are provided by multiple companies within the City. Solid waste generated during construction activities typically includes demolition of existing on-site structures, vegetation clearing, and grading would generate solid waste. Such waste would be source separated on-site for reuse, recycling, or proper disposal. The nearest

41 City of Arcadia. (2021). Final 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Page 6-40 through 6-41. Retrieved from:
https://cms9files.revize.com/arcadia/Shape%20Arcadia/Public%20Works%20Services%20Department/Water%20&%20Sewer%20Services/Fi nal%202020%20UWMP.pdf (Accessed November 10, 2021)
Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 112 ends

landfill to the City is the Puente Hills Landfill and Materials Recovery Facility (MRF). However, this facility is currently closed. The next nearest fac ility is the Scholl Canyon Landfill, approximately

6.9 miles west of the City.

Under the Project, it is not expected that future projects will lead to inadequate landfill capacity at the Scholl Canyon Landfill, which has a daily capacity of 3,400 tons per day. The landfill has the capacity for 58.9 million cubic yards an d has an operational life through 2030. 42 Solid waste generated at future housing developments fac ilitated by the HEU would represent a nominal increase in disposal rates. Existing landfill capacity would be sufficient to serve future development within the City.

Further, AB 341 requires Cities and Counties to implement recycling programs, reduce refuse at the source, and compost waste to achieve the es tablished 75 percent diversion of solid waste from landfills. Waste disposal is handled by multiple franchised waste haulers within the City. For future development, the City, in conjunction with those approved waste haulers, would perform outreach, education and monitoring pursuant to this regulation.

Future housing development facilitated by the HE U would be subject to the City’s development review process, which may include discretiona ry permit review and approval; as well as environmental review under CEQA, and be required to adhere to all federal, State, and local requirements for solid waste reduction and recycling. Considering these requirements, the HEU implementation would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of local infrastructure’s capacity. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. e. Comply with federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Less Than Significant Impact. State, County, and local agencies with regulatory authority related to solid waste include the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) and the City. Regulations specifically applicable to the proposed project include the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939), Section 4.408 of the CalGreen Code, and SB 341, which requires multi Ǧfamily residential development and commercial uses to implement recycling programs.

The Integrated Waste Management Act, which requ ires every City and Co unty in the State to prepare a Source Reduction and Recycling Elemen t (SRRE) to its Solid Waste Management Plan, identifies how each jurisdiction will meet th e State’s mandatory waste diversion goal of 50 percent by and after the year 2000. The diversion goal has been increased to 75 percent by 2020 by SB 341.

42 CalRecycle. (2011). SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details Scholl Canyon Landfill (19-AA-0012). Retrieved from:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/3531?siteID=1000 Accessed October 12, 2021 Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 113 ends

The 2019 CalGreen Code Section 4.408 requires preparation of a Construction Waste Management Plan that outlines ways in which the contractor would recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65 percent of the nonhaza rdous construction and demolition debris. As previously noted, the project would not result in direct housing construction, but would facilitate future housing development. During the construction phase of future housing development, projects would comply with the CalGreen Code through the recycling and reuse of at least 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and de molition debris from the project site. No conflict with statutes and regulations related to solid waste would occur.

Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 114 ends

XX. Wildfire
Would the Project:
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less Than Significant Impact. Undeveloped Areas are more likely to be high fire risk areas. Infill development will be proposed and prioritized th rough the housing element. These areas are in developed areas which reduces risk for wildland fire in the wildland urban interface. It is unlikely that emergency services traveling from the city to undeveloped areas and edges of the city will be impeded by construction activities or increa sed traffic created as a result of residential development under the housing element.

According to CalFire Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map43, most candidate housing sites, except those in the northernmost portion of the City, are not within a State responsibility area or a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. However, future developments facilitated by the Project would be required to continue assessing potential fire risks associated with their individual developments.

The established permitting process will assist future developers in further identifying any potential construction barriers or obstructions in the rights of way and paths for emergency access. Future developments may require the creation of a traffic control plan which will mitigate any concerns related to impeding emergency access. Fire prevention measures are also included in Goal S-3 of the Arcadia GP.

Furthermore, future development facilitated by the HEU would be subject to discretionary permits and required to meet the mandatory requirements related to the prevention of wildfire impacts. All future housing development would be required to comply with e CFC and CBC. As a result, HEU implementation would not substantia lly impair an adopted local or county-wide emergency response or evacuation plan. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concen trations from wildlife or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
Less Than Significant Impact. To further minimize risk from wildfire, future development on the candidate housing sites in high hazard severity zones are required to adhere to the 2019 California Fire Code, Title 24, Part 9, §304.1.2, which States the following:
• “Any person that owns, leases, controls, operates, or maintains any building or structure in, upon, or adjoining any mountainous area or forest-covered lands, brush covered lands,

43 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, California Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer Available at:
https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/789d5286736248f69c4515c04f58f414, Accessed February 5, 2021.

Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 115 ends

or grass-covered lands, or any land which is covered with flammable material, shall at all times do all of the following:”
o Maintain around and adjacent to such bu ilding or structure a firebreak made by removing and clearing away, for a distance of not less than 30 feet on each side thereof or to the property line, whichever is nearer, all flammable vegetation or other combustible growth. This section do es not apply to single specimens of trees, ornamental shrubbery, or similar plants which are used as ground cover, if they do not form a means of rapidly transmitting fire from the native growth to any building or structure.
o Maintain around and adjacent to any such building or structure additional fire protection or firebreak made by removi ng all bush, flammable vegetation, or combustible growth which is located from 30 feet to 100 feet from such building or structure or to the property line, whichever is nearer, as may be required by the enforcing agency if he finds that, because of extra hazardous conditions, a f i r e b r e a k o f o n l y 3 0 f e e t a r o u n d s u c h building or structure is not sufficient to provide reasonable fire safety. Grass and other vegetation located more than 30 feet from such building or structure and less than 18 inches in height above the ground may be maintained where necessary to stabilize the soil and prevent erosion.
o Remove that portion of any tree which extends within 10 feet of the outlet of any chimney or stovepipe.
o Cut and remove all dead or dying portions of trees located adjacent to or overhanging any building.
o Maintain the roof of any structure free of leaves, needles, or other dead vegetative growth.
o Provide and maintain at all times a scre en over the outlet of every chimney or stovepipe that is attached to any fireplac e, stove, or other device that burns any solid or liquid fuel. The screen shall be constructed of nonflammable material with openings of not more than 0.5 inch in size.
o Hazardous vegetation and fuels around all applicable buildings and structures shall be maintained in accordance with applicable regulations. 44 44 California Office of Administrative Law (2019). 2019 California Fire Code, Title 24, Part 9, §304.1.2. Retrieved from https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CFC2019P4/chapter-3-general-requirements. Accessed on August 25, 20201.

Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 116 ends

Future development facilitated by the Project would be required to adhere to all applicable fire prevention requirements and regulations, including California Fire Code requirement and would result in less than significant impacts.
c. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water resources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. As previously noted, the project would not result in direct housing construction but would facilitate future housing development. The need for installation and maintenance of new infrastructure (such as ro ads, fuel breaks, emergency water resources, power lines, or other utilities) would be evalua ted as part of the discretionary development permit review process. It is anticipated that future housing development facilitated by the Project would be served by the extension of existing utility infrastructure located primarily in existing rights-of-way, because of the predominately de veloped nature of the City. Through compliance with applicable development regulations in the case of future development, impacts are anticipated to be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. d. Expose people or structures to significan t risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Less Than Significant Impact. As previously noted, the project would not result in direct housing construction, but would facilita te future housing development. According to the California Geological Survey, The City does not contain any areas identified as having a severe potential for landslides.45 As well, as Stated in Geology and Soils Impact (a)(iv), The Project candidate housing focus areas are relatively flat and not within an area susceptible to landslides. Adherence to State and City codes, and emergency and evacuation plans set by the City and the County of San Bernardino would prevent impacts to people or structures from risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

45 California Geological Survey, Geologic Hazards Data and Maps Data Viewer. Available at https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/geologichazards/, Accessed October 12, 2021
Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 117 ends

XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance
Would the Project:
a. Have the potential to substantially degrade th e quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fi sh or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number, or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Less Than Significant Impact. On the basis of the foregoing analysis, the proposed project does not have the potential to significantly degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten or eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. All future housing development facilitated by the HEU would be subject to the City’s development review process and required to adhere to all federal, State, and local requirements. The HEU would not result in any direct environmental impacts that would substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major period s of California history or prehistory. Impacts are less than significant.
b. Have impacts that are individually limited, bu t cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of the past proj ects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Less than Significant Impact. State CEQA Guidelines §15065(a)(3) defines “cumulatively considerable as times when “the incremental effects of an individual project are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.” This document provides a programmatic analysis of the effects of the proposed HEU and the future housing development facilitated by its implementation.

The project would not result in direct housing construction but would facilitate and provide a policy framework for future housing developm ent throughout the City. Future housing development facilitated by the HEU would occur as market conditions allow and at the discretion of the individual property owners; be subject to the City’s development review process; be Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 118 ends

subject to environmental review under CEQA; and does not propose changes to current land use designations and zoning. Based on these factor s, and since all future housing development facilitated by the HEU would be subject to the City’s development review process, the project would not result in environmental effects, wh ich are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.
c. Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less Than Significant Impact. There are no known substantial adverse effects on human beings that would be caused by the proposed projec t. The project would facilitate future housing development throughout the City but would not result in direct housing construction. The HEU provides capacity for future housing developm ent consistent with State Housing law. The candidate housing sites are dispersed throughout the community to minimize the potential for adverse environmental impacts. The provision of a dditional housing in the City is intended to create adequate housing availability at all income levels. The creation of more economically and socially diversified housing choices is a goal of the HEU and is intended to provide new housing opportunities for low-income households. Implementation of the HEU would provide additional housing options for a variety of income levels, as allocated by RHNA.

Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 119 ends

XXII. References
California Department of Conservation, California Important Farmland Finder . https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/, Accessed October 7, 2021.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, California Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer Available at:
https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/789d5286736248f69c4515c04f58f414, Accessed February 5, 2021
California Department of Transportation (Caltr ans). (2021). California State Scenic Highway System Map. Retrieved from:
https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46c c8e8057116f1aacaa. Accessed October 12, 2021
California Geological Survey, Geologic Hazard s Data and Maps Data Viewer. Available at https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/geologichazards/, Accessed October 12, 2021 California Office of Administrative Law (2019). 2019 California Fire Code, Title 24, Part 9, §304.1.2.

Retrieved from https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CFC2019P4/chapter-3-general- requirements. Accessed on August 25, 20201.

CalRecycle. (2011). SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details Scholl Canyon Landfill (19-AA-0012).

Retrieved from:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/3531?siteID=1000 Accessed October 12, 2021
City of Arcadia. (2021). Final 2020 Urban Water Management Plan . Retrieved from:
https://cms9files.revize.com/arcadia/Shape%20Arcadia/Public%20Works%20Services% 20Department/Water%20&%20Sewer%20Services/Final%202020%20UWMP.pdf (Accessed November 10, 2021)
City of Arcadia. (2010). City of Arcadia General Plan . Retrieved from:
https://www.arcadiaca.gov/shape/development_services_department/planning___zoni ng/general_plan.php#outer-446 Accessed October 12, 2021 City of Arcadia. 2010 General Plan – Sectio n 10 Implementation Plan. Available at https://cms9files.revize.com/arcadia/Shape%20Arcadia/Development%20Services/gene ral%20plan/Implementation%20Plan.pdf. Accessed November 2021.

City of Arcadia. 2010 General Plan Update En vironmental Impact Report. Available at https://www.arcadiaca.gov/shape/development_services_department/planning___zoni ng/general_plan.php#outer-708. Accessed November 2021.

Arcadia 6th Cycle HEU
Administrative Draft Initia l Study/Negative Declaration

Page 120 ends

FEMA. (2008). FEMA Flood Map Service Center: Search By Address. Retrieved from:
https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery=arcadia#searchresultsanchor Accessed October 12, 2021
SCAG. Connect SoCal (2020). Retrieved from https://scag.ca.gov/connect-socal. Accessed on August 25, 2021

Appendix A

CITY OF ARCADIA 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE – INVENTORY OF CANDIDATE HOUSING SITES Multiple candidate sites were identified throughout the City which were found to be suitable to accommodate future development in order to meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation. These candidate sites are chosen based on their ability to accommod ate very low, low, moderate, and above moderate income housing sites.

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
20 5788-020-015 R-2 MDR No 0 0.66 Yes 12 N/A Pipeline
Project N/A
33 0 0 33
25 5788-020-029 R-2 MDR No 0 2.23 Yes 12 N/A Pipeline
Project N/A
10 8573-024-005 MU MU Yes 0 0.21 No 24 N/A Pipeline
Project N/A
12 0 0 12
9 8573-024-006 MU MU Yes 0 0.20 No 24 N/A Pipeline
Project N/A
1 5775-025-033 CBD C 1.0 No 2 0.05 No 64 N/A Pipeline
Project N/A
157 0 0 157
2 5775-025-034 CBD C 1.0 No 0 0.11 No 64 N/A Pipeline
Project N/A
11 5775-025-038 CBD C 1.0 No 1 0.22 No 64 N/A Pipeline
Project N/A
12 5775-025-032 CBD C 1.0 No 0 0.23 No 64 N/A Pipeline
Project N/A
16 5775-025-031 CBD C 1.0 No 0 0.37 No 64 N/A Pipeline
Project N/A
22 5775-025-029 CBD C 1.0 No 0 1.14 Yes 64 N/A Pipeline Project N/A
23 5775-025-037 DMU DMU No 0 1.67 Yes 64 N/A Pipeline
Project N/A
13 5772-002-001 R-3 HDR No 4 0.34 No 24 N/A Pipeline
Project N/A 2 0 0 6
8 5779-012-030 R-3 HDR No 2 0.19 No 24 N/A Pipeline
Project N/A 2 0 0 4
5 5779-010-010 R-3 HDR No 1 0.18 No 24 N/A Pipeline
Project N/A 2 0 0 3
18 5778-010-017 R-3 HDR No 2 0.48 No 24 40 Pipeline
Project N/A 9 0 0 10

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
14 5779-019-007 R-2 MDR No 3 0.36 No 12 N/A Pipeline
Project N/A 1 0 0 8
24 5773-006-036 DMU DMU No 0 2.18 Yes 64 80 Pipeline
Project N/A 319 26 0 293
27 5777-038-012 C-G C No 0 4.78 Yes 0 30 Pipeline
Project N/A
297 0 0 297
28 5777-038-014 C-G C No 0 6.74 Yes 0 30 Pipeline
Project N/A
29 5773-014-037 CBD C 1.0 No 2 0.51 Yes 64 N/A Propensity 32 30 8 3 19 30 5773-007-038 DMU DMU No 2 0.51 Yes 64 N/A Propensity 32 30 8 3 19 31 5773-013-034 CBD C 1.0 No 0 0.52 Yes 64 N/A Propensity 32 32 8 3 21 32 5773-012-023 DMU DMU No 0 0.54 Yes 64 N/A Propensity 34 34 9 3 22 33 5773-011-062 DMU DMU No 0 0.54 Yes 64 N/A Propensity 34 34 9 3 22 34 5773-006-053 DMU DMU No 0 0.57 Yes 64 N/A Propensity 36 36 9 4 23 35 5773-014-038 CBD C 1.0 No 0 0.58 Yes 64 N/A Propensity 36 36 9 4 23

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
45 5775-022-805 DMU DMU No 0 0.87 Yes 64 N/A Propensity 55 55 14 6 35 46 5773-007-033 DMU DMU No 0 0.90 Yes 64 N/A Propensity 57 57 14 6 37 47 5773-006-068 DMU DMU No 0 0.94 Yes 64 N/A Propensity 60 60 15 6 39 49 5773-014-051 CBD C 1.0 No 1 1.15 Yes 64 N/A Propensity 73 72 18 7 47 50 5773-006-064 DMU DMU No 0 1.22 Yes 64 N/A Propensity 77 77 19 8 50 51 5773-011-036 DMU DMU No 0 1.22 Yes 64 N/A Propensity 77 77 19 8 50 52 5773-012-901 DMU DMU No 0 1.26 Yes 64 N/A Propensity 80 80 20 8 52 332 5773-005-034 C-G C 1.0 Yes 0 0.52 Yes 0 64 Focus Area 33 33 8 3 22 333 5775-022-049 SP-AP C 1.0 No 0 0.55 Yes 64 Focus Area 35 35 9 4 22 334 5773-015-053 C-G C No 0 0.63 Yes 0 64 Focus Area 40 40 10 4 26 335 5775-022-047 SP-AP C 1.0 No 0 0.68 Yes 64 Focus Area 43 43 11 4 28

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
464 5779-016-005 MU MU No 0 0.14 No 40 40 Focus Area 5 5 1 1 3 466 5773-020-035 MU MU No 0 0.14 No 40 40 Focus Area 5 5 1 1 3 467 5779-014-018 MU MU No 0 0.14 No 40 40 Focus Area 5 5 1 1 3 469 5789-028-029 MU MU No 0 0.15 No 40 40 Focus Area 5 5 1 1 3 473 5779-003-001 MU MU No 0 0.15 No 40 40 Focus Area 5 5 1 1 3 475 5773-017-090 MU MU No 0 0.15 No 40 40 Focus Area 6 6 2 1 3 477 5779-014-020 MU MU No 1 0.15 No 40 40 Focus Area 6 5 1 1 3 478 5779-014-019 MU MU No 1 0.15 No 40 40 Focus Area 6 5 1 1 3 479 5779-003-035 MU MU No 0 0.15 No 40 40 Focus Area 6 6 2 1 3 480 5779-017-023 MU MU Yes 0 0.15 No 40 40 Focus Area 6 6 2 1 3 482 5773-020-001 MU MU No 0 0.15 No 40 40 Focus Area 6 6 2 1 3

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
53 5783-006-018 R-3 HDR No 9 0.50 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 16 7 2 1 4 54 5779-005-043 R-3 HDR No 12 0.50 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 16 4 1 0 3 55 5379-028-021 R-3 HDR No 12 0.50 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 16 4 1 0 3 57 5772-005-001 R-3 HDR No 0 0.50 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 16 16 4 2 10 58 5773-016-091 R-3 HDR No 7 0.51 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 16 9 2 1 6 59 5383-029-038 R-3 HDR No 0 0.51 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 16 16 4 2 10 60 5382-001-042 R-3 HDR No 7 0.52 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 16 9 2 1 6 69 5379-022-112 R-3 HDR No 8 0.54 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 17 9 2 1 6 70 5779-003-066 R-3 HDR No 6 0.54 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 17 11 3 1 7 71 5773-013-058 R-3 HDR No 11 0.54 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 17 6 2 1 3 72 5773-014-050 R-3 HDR No 10 0.55 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 17 7 2 1 4 74 5778-015-018 R-3 HDR No 11 0.56 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 17 6 2 1 3

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
75 5777-028-015 R-3 HDR No 12 0.56 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 17 5 1 1 3 76 5379-029-084 R-3 HDR No 10 0.56 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 17 7 2 1 4 78 5783-006-063 R-3 HDR No 10 0.56 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 18 8 2 1 5 79 5783-001-046 R-3 HDR No 10 0.57 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 18 8 2 1 5 80 5778-002-064 R-3 HDR No 12 0.57 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 18 6 2 1 3 82 5773-016-172 R-3 HDR No 8 0.57 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 18 10 3 1 6 83 5781-005-031 R-3 HDR No 10 0.57 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 18 8 2 1 5 84 5383-033-011 R-3 HDR No 5 0.58 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 18 13 3 1 9 85 5773-016-118 R-3 HDR No 7 0.58 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 18 11 3 1 7 86 5783-012-066 R-3 HDR No 8 0.58 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 18 10 3 1 6 87 5778-011-052 R-3 HDR No 10 0.58 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 18 8 2 1 5 88 5783-011-126 R-3 HDR No 12 0.59 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 18 6 2 1 3 89 5783-011-035 R-3 HDR No 4 0.59 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 18 14 4 1 9

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
90 5783-011-134 R-3 HDR No 8 0.59 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 18 10 3 1 6 91 5783-011-081 R-3 HDR No 13 0.59 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 18 5 1 1 3 92 5783-007-089 R-3 HDR No 6 0.60 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 19 13 3 1 9 93 5773-016-125 R-3 HDR No 7 0.60 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 19 12 3 1 8 94 5777-029-056 R-3 HDR No 11 0.60 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 19 8 2 1 5 95 5783-007-057 R-3 HDR No 10 0.60 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 19 9 2 1 6 96 5773-016-107 R-3 HDR No 7 0.61 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 19 12 3 1 8 97 5773-016-180 R-3 HDR No 8 0.61 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 19 11 3 1 7 99 5783-004-040 R-3 HDR No 12 0.62 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 19 7 2 1 4 100 5779-004-029 R-3 HDR No 12 0.62 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 19 7 2 1 4 101 5778-009-026 R-3 HDR No 12 0.64 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 20 8 2 1 5 102 5783-006-098 R-3 HDR No 12 0.64 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 20 8 2 1 5 104 5777-035-040 R-3 HDR No 13 0.65 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 20 7 2 1 4

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
105 5773-016-155 R-3 HDR No 10 0.65 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 20 10 3 1 6 107 5783-002-034 R-3 HDR No 13 0.66 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 21 8 2 1 5 109 5778-006-003 R-3 HDR No 14 0.66 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 21 7 2 1 4 110 5778-005-012 R-3 HDR No 2 0.66 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 21 19 5 2 12 111 5783-002-105 R-3 HDR No 8 0.66 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 21 13 3 1 9 112 5778-006-002 R-3 HDR No 15 0.66 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 21 6 2 1 3 113 5778-005-013 R-3 HDR No 1 0.67 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 21 20 5 2 13 115 5379-022-018 R-3 HDR No 12 0.67 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 21 9 2 1 6 116 5379-022-023 R-3 HDR No 16 0.67 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 21 5 1 1 3 118 5379-022-125 R-3 HDR No 12 0.67 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 21 9 2 1 6 119 5778-010-040 R-3 HDR No 12 0.68 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 21 9 2 1 6 120 5783-002-096 R-3 HDR No 14 0.68 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 21 7 2 1 4 121 5379-029-034 R-3 HDR No 11 0.68 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 21 10 3 1 6

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
122 5379-029-073 R-3 HDR No 15 0.69 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 22 7 2 1 4 123 5779-016-026 R-3 HDR No 0 0.70 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 22 22 6 2 14 126 5777-030-031 R-3 HDR No 14 0.71 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 22 8 2 1 5 127 5778-009-024 R-3 HDR No 12 0.72 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 23 11 3 1 7 128 5779-005-060 R-3 HDR No 16 0.72 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 23 7 2 1 4 129 5783-010-044 R-3 HDR No 11 0.72 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 23 12 3 1 8 130 5783-010-021 R-3 HDR No 13 0.72 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 23 10 3 1 6 131 5379-037-036 R-3 HDR No 14 0.73 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 23 9 2 1 6 132 5779-001-079 R-3 HDR No 16 0.73 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 23 7 2 1 4 133 5779-011-063 R-3 HDR No 15 0.73 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 23 8 2 1 5 135 5379-029-057 R-3 HDR No 17 0.74 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 23 6 2 1 3 136 5382-001-067 R-3 HDR No 1 0.75 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 23 22 6 2 14 137 5778-007-025 R-3 HDR No 8 0.75 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 23 15 4 2 9

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
138 5783-005-052 R-3 HDR No 15 0.76 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 24 9 2 1 6 139 5382-002-058 R-3 HDR No 14 0.77 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 24 10 3 1 6 140 5383-002-005 R-3 HDR No 14 0.77 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 24 10 3 1 6 141 5783-011-098 R-3 HDR No 16 0.77 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 24 8 2 1 5 142 5777-035-027 R-3 HDR No 20 0.80 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 25 5 1 1 3 143 5773-016-070 R-3 HDR No 20 0.81 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 25 5 1 1 3 144 5773-002-051 R-3 HDR No 16 0.82 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 26 10 3 1 6 145 5783-002-049 R-3 HDR No 14 0.83 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 26 12 3 1 8 146 5778-015-011 R-3 HDR No 11 0.83 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 26 15 4 2 9 148 5783-002-129 R-3 HDR No 18 0.83 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 26 8 2 1 5 149 5383-001-090 R-3 HDR No 10 0.84 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 26 16 4 2 10 151 5778-003-015 R-3 HDR No 21 0.84 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 26 5 1 1 3 152 5383-001-079 R-3 HDR No 16 0.85 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 27 11 3 1 7

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
154 5783-008-043 R-3 HDR No 12 0.86 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 27 15 4 2 9 155 5778-010-023 R-3 HDR No 14 0.87 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 27 13 3 1 9 156 5783-014-077 R-3 HDR No 16 0.87 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 27 11 3 1 7 157 5783-004-058 R-3 HDR No 16 0.87 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 27 11 3 1 7 158 5783-013-048 R-3 HDR No 10 0.87 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 27 17 4 2 11 159 5783-014-007 R-3 HDR No 21 0.87 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 27 6 2 1 3 160 5783-014-033 R-3 HDR No 16 0.87 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 27 11 3 1 7 161 5379-028-024 R-3 HDR No 18 0.87 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 27 9 2 1 6 162 5783-004-026 R-3 HDR No 20 0.87 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 27 7 2 1 4 163 5783-002-068 R-3 HDR No 17 0.87 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 27 10 3 1 6 164 5783-005-077 R-3 HDR No 18 0.87 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 27 9 2 1 6 165 5783-014-105 R-3 HDR No 18 0.87 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 27 9 2 1 6 166 5383-034-046 R-3 HDR No 18 0.88 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 28 10 3 1 6

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
167 5383-033-048 R-3 HDR No 19 0.89 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 28 9 2 1 6 168 5383-029-058 R-3 HDR No 18 0.89 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 28 10 3 1 6 169 5783-001-074 R-3 HDR No 10 0.91 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 28 18 5 2 11 170 5778-010-109 R-3 HDR No 18 0.93 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 29 11 3 1 7 172 5790-030-012 R-3 HDR No 21 0.96 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 30 9 2 1 6 173 5778-002-009 R-3 HDR No 20 0.97 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 31 11 3 1 7 175 5783-007-022 R-3 HDR No 21 0.98 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 31 10 3 1 6 176 5783-007-010 R-3 HDR No 23 0.98 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 31 8 2 1 5 179 5783-007-046 R-3 HDR No 14 0.98 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 31 17 4 2 11 180 5383-001-062 R-3 HDR No 18 0.98 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 31 13 3 1 9 181 5783-007-021 R-3 HDR No 24 0.98 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 31 7 2 1 4 182 5783-007-024 R-3 HDR No 20 0.98 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 31 11 3 1 7 183 5783-009-010 R-3 HDR No 22 0.98 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 31 9 2 1 6

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
184 5379-022-021 R-3 HDR No 12 0.98 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 31 19 5 2 12 185 5783-006-014 R-3 HDR No 20 1.00 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 31 11 3 1 7 186 5783-012-057 R-3 HDR No 20 1.01 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 32 12 3 1 8 187 5379-037-001 R-3 HDR No 26 1.03 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 32 6 2 1 3 188 5778-004-011 R-3 HDR No 22 1.03 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 32 10 3 1 6 189 5778-002-051 R-3 HDR No 18 1.04 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 33 15 4 2 9 190 5783-003-042 R-3 HDR No 20 1.05 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 33 13 3 1 9 192 5778-009-093 R-3 HDR No 21 1.06 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 33 12 3 1 8 193 5783-014-036 R-3 HDR No 21 1.06 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 33 12 3 1 8 194 5379-028-001 R-3 HDR No 23 1.07 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 34 11 3 1 7 195 5379-021-003 R-3 HDR No 18 1.08 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 34 16 4 2 10 196 5783-001-021 R-3 HDR No 24 1.09 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 34 10 3 1 6 197 5778-003-040 R-3 HDR No 21 1.10 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 35 14 4 1 9

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
198 5779-017-029 R-3 HDR No 0 1.11 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 35 35 9 4 22 200 5783-002-050 R-3 HDR No 25 1.11 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 35 10 3 1 6 201 5778-009-025 R-3 HDR No 23 1.12 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 35 12 3 1 8 202 5783-004-078 R-3 HDR No 20 1.12 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 35 15 4 2 9 203 5383-031-096 R-3 HDR No 26 1.13 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 36 10 3 1 6 204 5783-006-082 R-3 HDR No 14 1.15 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 36 22 6 2 14 206 5785-001-001 R-3 HDR No 32 1.21 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 38 6 2 1 3 207 5379-028-052 R-3 HDR No 25 1.23 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 39 14 4 1 9 208 5778-010-087 R-3 HDR No 30 1.27 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 40 10 3 1 6 209 5778-009-144 R-3 HDR No 27 1.28 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 41 14 4 1 9 210 5778-009-117 R-3 HDR No 24 1.29 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 41 17 4 2 11 211 5778-006-045 R-3 HDR No 34 1.33 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 42 8 2 1 5 212 5773-016-142 R-3 HDR No 16 1.33 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 42 26 7 3 16

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
213 5383-031-068 R-3 HDR No 30 1.34 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 42 12 3 1 8 214 5783-007-018 R-3 HDR No 34 1.36 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 43 9 2 1 6 215 5383-031-113 R-3 HDR No 15 1.36 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 43 28 7 3 18 216 5379-022-094 R-3 HDR No 28 1.38 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 44 16 4 2 10 217 5784-007-032 R-3 HDR No 25 1.44 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 46 21 5 2 14 221 5783-009-009 R-3 HDR No 31 1.47 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 47 16 4 2 10 222 5778-006-004 R-3 HDR No 44 1.51 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 48 4 1 0 3 223 5778-011-084 R-3 HDR No 32 1.55 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 49 17 4 2 11 224 5778-015-024 R-3 HDR No 0 1.58 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 50 50 13 5 32 225 5383-002-068 R-3 HDR No 30 1.58 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 50 20 5 2 13 226 5783-013-091 R-3 HDR No 22 1.60 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 51 29 7 3 19 227 5778-011-126 R-3 HDR No 30 1.66 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 53 23 6 2 15 228 5778-011-161 R-3 HDR No 32 1.67 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 53 21 5 2 14

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
229 5379-028-084 R-3 HDR No 32 1.67 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 53 21 5 2 14 230 5778-001-170 R-3 HDR No 34 1.69 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 54 20 5 2 13 231 5778-001-134 R-3 HDR No 30 1.70 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 54 24 6 2 16 232 5783-003-063 R-3 HDR No 20 1.74 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 55 35 9 4 22 233 5784-006-008 R-3 HDR No 40 1.78 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 56 16 4 2 10 234 5778-005-055 R-3 HDR No 40 1.78 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 57 17 4 2 11 235 5784-006-004 R-3 HDR No 38 1.79 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 57 19 5 2 12 236 5779-005-080 R-3 HDR No 20 1.81 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 57 37 9 4 24 237 5778-008-003 R-3 HDR No 28 1.88 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 60 32 8 3 21 238 5778-008-060 R-3 HDR No 44 2.10 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 67 23 6 2 15 239 5383-029-028 R-3 HDR No 0 2.17 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 69 69 17 7 45 240 5784-007-051 R-3 HDR No 25 2.20 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 70 45 11 5 29 243 5784-001-077 R-3 HDR No 26 2.29 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 73 47 12 5 30

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
244 5783-009-073 R-3 HDR No 42 2.36 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 75 33 8 3 22 245 5778-009-072 R-3 HDR No 46 2.44 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 78 32 8 3 21 246 5784-006-009 R-3 HDR No 0 2.54 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 81 81 20 8 53 247 5778-004-059 R-3 HDR No 44 2.58 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 82 38 10 4 24 248 5775-012-025 R-3 HDR No 54 2.65 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 84 30 8 3 19 249 5790-030-053 R-3 HDR No 60 2.83 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 90 30 8 3 19 250 5778-010-086 R-3 HDR No 45 3.18 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 101 56 14 6 36 251 5778-001-098 R-3 HDR No 74 3.42 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 109 35 9 4 22 252 5784-007-021 R-3 HDR No 0 3.60 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 115 115 29 12 74 253 5778-003-130 R-3 HDR No 90 4.18 Yes 24 32 R-3 Upzone 133 43 11 4 28 582 5779-014-054 R-3 HDR No 2 0.16 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 583 5778-010-115 R-3 HDR No 2 0.16 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
584 5783-014-080 R-3 HDR No 2 0.16 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 585 5779-013-060 R-3 HDR No 2 0.16 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 586 5779-013-071 R-3 HDR No 2 0.16 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 587 5779-013-048 R-3 HDR No 2 0.16 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 588 5773-016-159 R-3 HDR No 2 0.16 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 589 5778-010-121 R-3 HDR Yes 1 0.17 No 24 32 5 4 1 0 3 590 5778-010-129 R-3 HDR Yes 1 0.17 No 24 32 5 4 1 0 3 591 5379-022-144 R-3 HDR No 2 0.17 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 592 5783-006-085 R-3 HDR No 2 0.17 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 593 5773-002-057 R-3 HDR No 2 0.17 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 594 5779-017-039 R-3 HDR No 2 0.17 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 595 5779-016-056 R-3 HDR No 2 0.17 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 596 5779-016-062 R-3 HDR No 2 0.17 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
597 5779-017-034 R-3 HDR No 2 0.17 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 598 5779-017-037 R-3 HDR No 2 0.17 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 599 5783-003-066 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 600 5783-001-076 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 601 5783-001-088 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 602 5783-001-036 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 603 5779-017-032 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 604 5773-014-055 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 605 5779-001-038 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 606 5779-001-087 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 607 5779-001-053 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 608 5779-002-071 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 609 5779-011-098 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
610 5779-011-084 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 611 5773-018-051 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 612 5779-001-041 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 613 5779-003-069 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 614 5779-010-063 R-3 HDR No 1 0.18 No 24 32 5 4 1 0 3 615 5779-003-010 R-3 HDR No 1 0.18 No 24 32 5 4 1 0 3 616 5779-011-087 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 617 5779-003-076 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 618 5773-018-053 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 619 5779-009-070 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 620 5779-009-045 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 621 5779-009-077 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 622 5779-009-039 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
623 5779-009-057 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 624 5779-002-073 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 625 5783-003-069 R-3 HDR No 2 0.18 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 626 5773-013-037 R-3 HDR No 2 0.19 No 24 32 5 3 1 0 2 627 5773-017-071 R-3 HDR No 3 0.19 No 24 32 6 3 1 0 2 628 5773-017-088 R-3 HDR No 3 0.19 No 24 32 6 3 1 0 2 629 5779-012-046 R-3 HDR No 2 0.19 No 24 32 6 4 1 0 3 630 5779-012-083 R-3 HDR No 3 0.19 No 24 32 6 3 1 0 2 631 5779-012-079 R-3 HDR No 3 0.19 No 24 32 6 3 1 0 2 632 5779-012-068 R-3 HDR No 3 0.19 No 24 32 6 3 1 0 2 633 5779-009-061 R-3 HDR No 3 0.19 No 24 32 6 3 1 0 2 634 5779-012-086 R-3 HDR No 3 0.19 No 24 32 6 3 1 0 2 635 5773-016-144 R-3 HDR No 2 0.20 No 24 32 6 4 1 0 3

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
636 5783-009-101 R-3 HDR No 2 0.20 No 24 32 6 4 1 0 3 637 5773-016-183 R-3 HDR No 2 0.20 No 24 32 6 4 1 0 3 638 8587-033-025 R-3 HDR No 3 0.20 No 24 32 6 3 1 0 2 639 5778-010-118 R-3 HDR No 2 0.20 No 24 32 6 4 1 0 3 640 5779-003-073 R-3 HDR No 3 0.20 No 24 32 6 3 1 0 2 641 5783-007-077 R-3 HDR No 2 0.21 No 24 32 6 4 1 0 3 642 5773-016-078 R-3 HDR No 3 0.22 No 24 32 6 3 1 0 2 643 5783-005-116 R-3 HDR No 3 0.22 No 24 32 6 3 1 0 2 644 5772-006-033 R-3 HDR No 2 0.22 No 24 32 6 4 1 0 3 645 5773-016-043 R-3 HDR No 3 0.22 No 24 32 7 4 1 0 3 646 5778-010-112 R-3 HDR No 3 0.23 No 24 32 7 4 1 0 3 647 5783-009-109 R-3 HDR No 4 0.23 No 24 32 7 3 1 0 2 648 5778-005-062 R-3 HDR No 4 0.24 No 24 32 7 3 1 0 2

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
649 5773-016-163 R-3 HDR No 3 0.24 No 24 32 7 4 1 0 3 650 5778-015-049 R-3 HDR No 2 0.24 No 24 32 7 5 1 1 3 651 5778-011-088 R-3 HDR No 4 0.24 No 24 32 7 3 1 0 2 652 5777-030-035 R-3 HDR No 3 0.24 No 24 32 7 4 1 0 3 653 5778-011-175 R-3 HDR No 4 0.25 No 24 32 7 3 1 0 2 654 5772-003-029 R-3 HDR No 4 0.25 No 24 32 7 3 1 0 2 655 5385-029-055 R-3 HDR No 2 0.26 No 24 32 8 6 2 1 3 656 5773-016-050 R-3 HDR No 4 0.27 No 24 32 8 4 1 0 3 657 5773-017-067 R-3 HDR No 3 0.28 No 24 32 8 5 1 1 3 658 5779-016-048 R-3 HDR No 3 0.28 No 24 32 9 6 2 1 3 659 5778-010-127 R-3 HDR Yes 6 0.28 No 24 32 9 3 1 0 2 660 5379-029-104 R-3 HDR No 4 0.29 No 24 32 9 5 1 1 3 661 5779-005-101 R-3 HDR No 5 0.29 No 24 32 9 4 1 0 3

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
662 5783-011-101 R-3 HDR No 3 0.30 No 24 32 9 6 2 1 3 663 5783-014-112 R-3 HDR No 6 0.30 No 24 32 9 3 1 0 2 664 5773-016-083 R-3 HDR No 4 0.30 No 24 32 9 5 1 1 3 665 5779-003-059 R-3 HDR No 4 0.30 No 24 32 9 5 1 1 3 666 5773-020-049 R-3 HDR No 2 0.31 No 24 32 9 7 2 1 4 667 5775-011-036 R-3 HDR No 4 0.31 No 24 32 9 5 1 1 3 668 5779-003-084 R-3 HDR No 4 0.31 No 24 32 9 5 1 1 3 669 5783-006-033 R-3 HDR No 3 0.31 No 24 32 10 7 2 1 4 670 5783-005-128 R-3 HDR No 6 0.32 No 24 32 10 4 1 0 3 671 5379-022-131 R-3 HDR No 6 0.34 No 24 32 10 4 1 0 3 672 5783-006-054 R-3 HDR No 4 0.34 No 24 32 10 6 2 1 3 673 5773-016-111 R-3 HDR No 4 0.34 No 24 32 10 6 2 1 3 674 5783-013-054 R-3 HDR No 5 0.35 No 24 32 11 6 2 1 3

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
675 5778-011-095 R-3 HDR No 4 0.35 No 24 32 11 7 2 1 4 676 5783-009-105 R-3 HDR No 4 0.35 No 24 32 11 7 2 1 4 677 5779-016-053 R-3 HDR No 4 0.35 No 24 32 11 7 2 1 4 678 5379-028-097 R-3 HDR No 7 0.35 No 24 32 11 4 1 0 3 679 5779-004-043 R-3 HDR No 4 0.35 No 24 32 11 7 2 1 4 680 5783-005-133 R-3 HDR No 4 0.35 No 24 32 11 7 2 1 4 681 5773-014-064 R-3 HDR No 6 0.36 No 24 32 11 5 1 1 3 682 5778-011-183 R-3 HDR No 8 0.36 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 683 5783-010-065 R-3 HDR No 8 0.36 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 684 5783-010-055 R-3 HDR No 6 0.36 No 24 32 11 5 1 1 3 685 5783-010-070 R-3 HDR No 4 0.36 No 24 32 11 7 2 1 4 686 5779-011-095 R-3 HDR No 8 0.36 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 687 5779-011-081 R-3 HDR No 8 0.36 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
688 5773-019-071 R-3 HDR No 5 0.36 No 24 32 11 6 2 1 3 689 5779-001-084 R-3 HDR No 5 0.36 No 24 32 11 6 2 1 3 690 5779-003-054 R-3 HDR No 8 0.36 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 691 5779-010-055 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 692 5779-010-073 R-3 HDR No 6 0.37 No 24 32 11 5 1 1 3 693 5783-005-113 R-3 HDR No 7 0.37 No 24 32 11 4 1 0 3 694 5779-002-092 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 695 5779-010-080 R-3 HDR No 6 0.37 No 24 32 11 5 1 1 3 696 5779-001-062 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 697 5779-010-060 R-3 HDR No 4 0.37 No 24 32 11 7 2 1 4 698 5779-003-046 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 699 5779-011-072 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 700 5773-018-043 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
701 5779-002-069 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 702 5773-018-049 R-3 HDR No 5 0.37 No 24 32 11 6 2 1 3 703 5773-020-059 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 704 5773-020-046 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 705 5779-012-064 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 706 5779-012-055 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 707 5773-013-046 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 708 5379-037-070 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 709 5779-002-083 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 710 5773-018-063 R-3 HDR No 8 0.37 No 24 32 11 3 1 0 2 711 5783-005-093 R-3 HDR No 7 0.37 No 24 32 11 4 1 0 3 712 5379-028-105 R-3 HDR No 7 0.37 No 24 32 11 4 1 0 3 713 5783-005-084 R-3 HDR No 6 0.37 No 24 32 11 5 1 1 3

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
714 5784-001-086 R-3 HDR No 7 0.38 No 24 32 12 5 1 1 3 715 5778-008-068 R-3 HDR No 7 0.38 No 24 32 12 5 1 1 3 716 5779-012-075 R-3 HDR No 6 0.39 No 24 32 12 6 2 1 3 717 5379-029-090 R-3 HDR No 5 0.39 No 24 32 12 7 2 1 4 718 5779-009-067 R-3 HDR No 5 0.39 No 24 32 12 7 2 1 4 719 5779-009-054 R-3 HDR No 8 0.39 No 24 32 12 4 1 0 3 720 5783-009-099 R-3 HDR No 5 0.39 No 24 32 12 7 2 1 4 721 5783-005-121 R-3 HDR No 4 0.39 No 24 32 12 8 2 1 5 722 5382-001-066 R-3 HDR No 7 0.39 No 24 32 12 5 1 1 3 723 5385-029-050 R-3 HDR No 8 0.40 No 24 32 12 4 1 0 3 724 5379-028-112 R-3 HDR No 6 0.40 No 24 32 12 6 2 1 3 725 5783-007-072 R-3 HDR No 5 0.40 No 24 32 12 7 2 1 4 726 8587-034-030 R-3 HDR No 4 0.40 No 24 32 12 8 2 1 5

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
727 5783-005-059 R-3 HDR No 7 0.40 No 24 32 12 5 1 1 3 728 5383-002-101 R-3 HDR No 8 0.41 No 24 32 13 5 1 1 3 729 5383-034-062 R-3 HDR No 8 0.41 No 24 32 13 5 1 1 3 730 5783-011-139 R-3 HDR No 4 0.41 No 24 32 13 9 2 1 6 731 5783-014-060 R-3 HDR No 6 0.41 No 24 32 13 7 2 1 4 732 5783-008-058 R-3 HDR No 8 0.41 No 24 32 13 5 1 1 3 733 5779-015-039 R-3 HDR No 8 0.41 No 24 32 13 5 1 1 3 734 5383-002-108 R-3 HDR No 6 0.41 No 24 32 13 7 2 1 4 735 5383-002-078 R-3 HDR No 7 0.41 No 24 32 13 6 2 1 3 736 5778-015-046 R-3 HDR No 5 0.42 No 24 32 13 8 2 1 5 737 5783-003-077 R-3 HDR No 8 0.42 No 24 32 13 5 1 1 3 738 5379-029-040 R-3 HDR No 4 0.42 No 24 32 13 9 2 1 6 739 5779-017-048 R-3 HDR No 8 0.42 No 24 32 13 5 1 1 3

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
740 5773-016-098 R-3 HDR No 5 0.43 No 24 32 13 8 2 1 5 741 5783-002-078 R-3 HDR No 9 0.43 No 24 32 13 4 1 0 3 742 5778-003-137 R-3 HDR No 6 0.43 No 24 32 13 7 2 1 4 743 5783-014-043 R-3 HDR No 6 0.43 No 24 32 13 7 2 1 4 744 5783-011-068 R-3 HDR No 9 0.43 No 24 32 13 4 1 0 3 745 5379-029-099 R-3 HDR No 8 0.43 No 24 32 13 5 1 1 3 746 5783-006-043 R-3 HDR No 7 0.43 No 24 32 13 6 2 1 3 747 5383-034-027 R-3 HDR No 6 0.43 No 24 32 13 7 2 1 4 748 5783-014-086 R-3 HDR No 6 0.43 No 24 32 13 7 2 1 4 749 5783-012-036 R-3 HDR No 8 0.44 No 24 32 13 5 1 1 3 750 5783-001-031 R-3 HDR No 8 0.44 No 24 32 13 5 1 1 3 751 5379-022-141 R-3 HDR No 9 0.44 No 24 32 13 4 1 0 3 752 5783-001-085 R-3 HDR No 8 0.44 No 24 32 13 5 1 1 3

Appendix A

ID APN Existing
Zoning
Existing
General
Plan
Land
Use
Vacancy Existing
Units Gross Acreage
HCD
Sizing
Criteria
Existing
Zone
Density
(Assumed)
Rezoned
Density
(Assumed)
Inventory
Category
Potential
Rezoned
Unit
Yield
Assumed
Net Yield LVL Mod Above
Mod
753 5783-010-075 R-3 HDR No 5 0.44 No 24 32 14 9 2 1 6 754 5778-008-016 R-3 HDR No 6 0.44 No 24 32 14 8 2 1 5 755 5379-022-104 R-3 HDR No 7 0.44 No 24 32 14 7 2 1 4 756 5783-001-056 R-3 HDR No 9 0.44 No 24 32 14 5 1 1 3 757 5779-014-043 R-3 HDR No 8 0.44 No 24 32 14 6 2 1 3 758 5383-002-085 R-3 HDR No 6 0.44 No 24 32 14 8 2 1 5 759 5773-001-063 R-3 HDR No 6 0.44 No 24 32 14 8 2 1 5 760 5778-015-035 R-3 HDR No 11 0.45 No 24 32 14 3 1 0 2 761 5379-028-090 R-3 HDR No 6 0.46 No 24 32 14 8 2 1 5 762 5783-013-067 R-3 HDR No 9 0.46 No 24 32 14 5 1 1 3 763 5779-013-037 R-3 HDR No 10 0.47 No 24 32 14 4 1 0 3 764 5783-014-053 R-3 HDR No 9 0.47 No 24 32 15 6 2 1 3 765 5383-031-120 R-3 HDR No 6 0.48 No 24 32 15 9 2 1 6

Appendix A

Arcadia City CouncilFebruary 15, 2022

Arcadia City Council
February 15, 2022