Agenda packet — Arroyo Grande City Council, March 14, 2023 (part 3 of 3)

3/13/2017 SurveyMonkey Analyze Arroyo Grande Halcyon Road Complete Streets Plan (English) https://www.surveymonkey.com/analyze/4gnzhln5_2B1y6qJuhmwrQovZp_2B_2B2ybqDPPgtoHAq6Ijo_3D 10/27 Q18

31.25% 5

25.00% 4

12.50% 2

25.00% 4

6.25% 1
Total 16
4+ times per
week
13 times per
week
13 times per month
Rarely
Never
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– 4+ times per week
– 13 times per week
– 13 times per month
– Rarely
– Never
Customize Export
What are your key walking destinations
along Halcyon Road? (check all that apply)
Answered: 16 Skipped: 1

Page 318 of 361 ends

3/13/2017 SurveyMonkey Analyze Arroyo Grande Halcyon Road Complete Streets Plan (English) https://www.surveymonkey.com/analyze/4gnzhln5_2B1y6qJuhmwrQovZp_2B_2B2ybqDPPgtoHAq6Ijo_3D 11/27 Q19

6.25% 1

0.00% 0

31.25% 5

62.50% 10

31.25% 5

18.75% 3

56.25% 9

12.50% 2

0.00% 0
Total Respondents: 16
Work
Bus stop
Church
Friend's house
School
Recreation area
Shopping or
errands...

No particular
destination:...

I never walk
along Halcyo...

I only use
Halcyon Road...

Other (please
specify)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– Work
– Bus stop
– Church
– Friend's house
– School
– Recreation area
– Shopping or errands (including medical services)
– No particular destination: walking for fitness or leisure – I never walk along Halcyon Road
– I only use Halcyon Road to access other areas
– Other (please specify) Responses
Customize Export
How often do you bike along Halcyon
Road?
Answered: 16 Skipped: 1

Page 319 of 361 ends

3/13/2017 SurveyMonkey Analyze Arroyo Grande Halcyon Road Complete Streets Plan (English) https://www.surveymonkey.com/analyze/4gnzhln5_2B1y6qJuhmwrQovZp_2B_2B2ybqDPPgtoHAq6Ijo_3D 12/27 Q20

6.25% 1

12.50% 2

18.75% 3

43.75% 7
Total 16
4+ times per
week
13 times per
week
13 times per month
Rarely
Never
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– 4+ times per week
– 13 times per week
– 13 times per month
– Rarely
– Never
Customize Export
What are your key biking destinations along
Halcyon Road? (check all that apply)
Answered: 14 Skipped: 3

Page 320 of 361 ends

3/13/2017 SurveyMonkey Analyze Arroyo Grande Halcyon Road Complete Streets Plan (English) https://www.surveymonkey.com/analyze/4gnzhln5_2B1y6qJuhmwrQovZp_2B_2B2ybqDPPgtoHAq6Ijo_3D 13/27 Q21

7.14% 1

0.00% 0

28.57% 4

35.71% 5

21.43% 3

42.86% 6

35.71% 5

7.14% 1

0.00% 0
Total Respondents: 14
Work
Bus stop
Church
Friend's house
School
Recreation area
Shopping or
errands...

No particular
destination:...

I never bike
along Halcyo...

I only use
Halcyon Road...

Other (please
specify)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– Work
– Bus stop
– Church
– Friend's house
– School
– Recreation area
– Shopping or errands (including medical services)
– No particular destination: biking for fitness or leisure – I never bike along Halcyon Road
– I only use Halcyon Road to access other areas
– Other (please specify) Responses
Customize Export
How often do you take transit to Halcyon
Road for any purpose?
Answered: 15 Skipped: 2

Page 321 of 361 ends

3/13/2017 SurveyMonkey Analyze Arroyo Grande Halcyon Road Complete Streets Plan (English) https://www.surveymonkey.com/analyze/4gnzhln5_2B1y6qJuhmwrQovZp_2B_2B2ybqDPPgtoHAq6Ijo_3D 14/27 Q22

6.67% 1

0.00% 0

20.00% 3

73.33% 11
Total 15
4+ times per
week
13 times per
week
13 times per month
Rarely
Never
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– 4+ times per week
– 13 times per week
– 13 times per month
– Rarely
– Never
Customize Export

7.69% 1
What are your key transit destinations
along Halcyon Road? (check all that apply)
Answered: 13 Skipped: 4
Work
Church
Friend's house
School
Recreation area
Shopping or
errands...

I never take
transit alon...

I only use
Halcyon Road...

Other (please
specify)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– Work

Page 322 of 361 ends

3/13/2017 SurveyMonkey Analyze Arroyo Grande Halcyon Road Complete Streets Plan (English) https://www.surveymonkey.com/analyze/4gnzhln5_2B1y6qJuhmwrQovZp_2B_2B2ybqDPPgtoHAq6Ijo_3D 15/27 Q23
Q24

7.69% 1

15.38% 2

23.08% 3

15.38% 2

46.15% 6

23.08% 3

7.69% 1
Total Respondents: 13
– Church
– Friend's house
– School
– Recreation area
– Shopping or errands (including medical services)
– I never take transit along Halcyon Road
– I only use Halcyon Road to access other areas
– Other (please specify) Responses
Customize Export

50.00% 7

7.14% 1

0.00% 0

14.29% 2

28.57% 4
How often do you take transit to/from
Halcyon Road for any purpose?
Answered: 14 Skipped: 3
Total 14
4+ times per
week
13 times per
week
13 times per month
Rarely
Never
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– 4+ times per week
– 13 times per week
– 13 times per month
– Rarely
– Never
Customize Export
What are your key driving destinations
along Halcyon Road? (check all that apply)
Answered: 16 Skipped: 1

Page 323 of 361 ends

62.50% 10

0.00% 0

43.75% 7

56.25% 9

43.75% 7

68.75% 11

0.00% 0

25.00% 4

6.25% 1
Total Respondents: 16
Work
Bus stop
Church
Friend's house
School
Recreation area
Shopping or
errands...

I never drive
along Halcyo...

I only use
Halcyon Road...

Other (please
specify)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– Work
– Bus stop
– Church
– Friend's house
– School
– Recreation area
– Shopping or errands (including medical services)
– I never drive along Halcyon Road
– I only use Halcyon Road to access other areas
– Other (please specify) Responses
Customize Export
The transportation options available to me
along Halcyon Road are suitable to my
needs:

Answered: 16 Skipped: 1

Page 324 of 361 ends

3/13/2017 SurveyMonkey Analyze Arroyo Grande Halcyon Road Complete Streets Plan (English) https://www.surveymonkey.com/analyze/4gnzhln5_2B1y6qJuhmwrQovZp_2B_2B2ybqDPPgtoHAq6Ijo_3D 17/27 Q26

12.50% 2

31.25% 5

25.00% 4
Total 16
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– Strongly agree
– Agree
– Disagree
– Strongly disagree
Customize Export

0.00% 0

62.50% 10

37.50% 6
How would you rate overall walking
conditions along Halcyon Road?
Answered: 16 Skipped: 1
Total 16
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– Excellent
– Good
– Fair
– Poor

Page 325 of 361 ends

53.33% 8

40.00% 6

6.67% 1

0.00% 0
How important is it to you to improve
walking conditions along Halcyon Road?
Answered: 15 Skipped: 2
Total 15
Very important
Important
Not important
Very
unimportant
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– Very important
– Important
– Not important
– Very unimportant
Customize Export
What discourages you the most from
walking along Halcyon Road? Please select
up to five (5) factors.

Answered: 15 Skipped: 2

Page 326 of 361 ends

3/13/2017 SurveyMonkey Analyze Arroyo Grande Halcyon Road Complete Streets Plan (English) https://www.surveymonkey.com/analyze/4gnzhln5_2B1y6qJuhmwrQovZp_2B_2B2ybqDPPgtoHAq6Ijo_3D 19/27 Q29

66.67% 10

93.33% 14

60.00% 9

80.00% 12

0.00% 0

26.67% 4

6.67% 1

0.00% 0

6.67% 1

6.67% 1
Total Respondents: 15
Lack of or
incomplete...

Heavy/fast motor vehicl...

Dangerous
bevhavior by...

Lack of safe
crossings (e...

Lack of
time/distanc...

Lack of
amenities...

I don't feel
safe walking...

I have too many things ...

I am not
physically a...

Other (please
specify)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– Lack of or incomplete sidewalks
– Heavy/fast motor vehicle traffic
– Dangerous bevhavior by people driving (e.g., speeding, not yielding, etc.) – Lack of safe crossings (e.g. marked crosswalks or traffic signals) – Lack of time/distance to walk is too far
– Lack of amenities (benches, trees/shade, streetlights) – I don't feel safe walking (e.g. crime, personal safety) – I have too many things to carry
– I am not physically able to walk
– Other (please specify) Responses
Customize Export
Tell us about walking along Halcyon Road
Answered: 14 Skipped: 3

Page 327 of 361 ends

3/13/2017 SurveyMonkey Analyze Arroyo Grande Halcyon Road Complete Streets Plan (English) https://www.surveymonkey.com/analyze/4gnzhln5_2B1y6qJuhmwrQovZp_2B_2B2ybqDPPgtoHAq6Ijo_3D 20/27 Q30

0.00%
0 57.14%
8 21.43%
3 21.43%
3 14 2.64

0.00%
0 14.29%
2 28.57%
4 57.14%
8 14 3.43

0.00%
0 57.14%
8 28.57%
4 14.29%
2 14 2.57

14.29%
2 42.86%
6 21.43%
3 21.43%
3 14 2.50

0.00%
0 53.85%
7 38.46%
5 7.69%
1 13 2.54
I can
conveniently...

I feel safe
from cars
I have enough
time to cros...

I am not
concerned ab...

Pedestrian
areas in ret...
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
– Strongly
agree –
Agree – Disagree – Strongly
disagree –
Total – Weighted
Average –
I can
conveniently
walk where I
want
–
I feel safe
from cars
–
I have
enough time
to cross
roads at
traffic
signals
–
I am not
concerned
about my
safety (i.e., I
feel safe
from other
people)
–
Pedestrian
areas in
retail or
commercial
areas are
well lit
–
Customize Export
How would you rank overall biking
conditions along Halcyon Road?
Answered: 15 Skipped: 2

Page 328 of 361 ends

3/13/2017 SurveyMonkey Analyze Arroyo Grande Halcyon Road Complete Streets Plan (English) https://www.surveymonkey.com/analyze/4gnzhln5_2B1y6qJuhmwrQovZp_2B_2B2ybqDPPgtoHAq6Ijo_3D 21/27 Q31

0.00% 0

6.67% 1

20.00% 3

73.33% 11
Total 15
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– Excellent
– Good
– Fair
– Poor
Customize Export

46.67% 7

26.67% 4

0.00% 0
How important is it to you to improve biking
conditions along Halcyon Road?
Answered: 15 Skipped: 2
Total 15
Very Important
Important
Not Important
Very
Unimportant
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– Very Important
– Important
– Not Important
– Very Unimportant

Page 329 of 361 ends

73.33% 11

86.67% 13

80.00% 12

66.67% 10

0.00% 0

20.00% 3

0.00% 0

6.67% 1

0.00% 0

0.00% 0
What discourages you most from biking
along Halcyon Road? Please select up to
five (5) factors.

Answered: 15 Skipped: 2
Total Respondents: 15
Lack of or
incomplete...

Heavy/fast motor vehicl...

Dangerous
behavior by...

Lack of safe
crossings...

Lack of
time/distanc...

No street
lights (e.g....

I don’t feel
safe biking...

I have too many things ...

No bicycle
racks or...

I am not
physically a...

I do not own a
bicycle in...

Other (please
specify)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– Lack of or incomplete bicycle route
– Heavy/fast motor vehicle traffic
– Dangerous behavior by people driving (e.g., speeding, not yielding, etc.) – Lack of safe crossings (e.g., marked lanes or traffic signal detection) – Lack of time/distance to bike is too far
– No street lights (e.g., too dark)
– I don’t feel safe biking (e.g., crime, personal safety) – I have too many things to carry
– No bicycle racks or insufficient bicycle parking at my destination – I am not physically able to bike
– I do not own a bicycle in working condition
– Other (please specify) Responses
Customize Export
Tell us about biking along Halcyon Road

Page 330 of 361 ends

7.69%
1 30.77%
4 30.77%
4 30.77%
4 13 2.85

0.00%
0 0.00%
0 38.46%
5 61.54%
8 13 3.62

0.00%
0 61.54%
8 15.38%
2 23.08%
3 13 2.62

7.69%
1 30.77%
4 23.08%
3 38.46%
5 13 2.92
I can
conveniently...

I feel safe
from cars
I have enough
time to cros...

I am not
concerned ab...
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
– Strongly
agree –
Agree – Disagree – Strongly
disagree –
Total – Weighted
Average –
I can
conveniently
bike where I
want
–
I feel safe
from cars
–
I have
enough time
to cross
roads at
traffic
signals
–
I am not
concerned
about my
safety (i.e., I
feel safe
from other
people)
–
Customize Export
Tell us about driving along Halcyon Road
Answered: 16 Skipped: 1
I can
conveniently...

I am never
delayed by...

I am not
concerned ab...

The road is in
good condition
I do not drive
along Halcyo...
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Page 331 of 361 ends

18.75%
3 37.50%
6 43.75%
7 0.00%
0 16 2.25

18.75%
3 37.50%
6 31.25%
5 12.50%
2 16 2.38

12.50%
2 43.75%
7 31.25%
5 12.50%
2 16 2.44

0.00%
0 81.25%
13 12.50%
2 6.25%
1 16 2.25

0.00%
0 0.00%
0 8.33%
1 91.67%
11 12 3.92
– Strongly
agree –
Agree – Disagree – Strongly
disagree –
Total – Weighted
Average –
I can
conveniently
drive and
park where I
want along
the corridor
–
I am never
delayed by
traffic or
traffic signal
timing along
the corridor
–
I am not
concerned
about my
safety (I feel
safe)
–
The road is
in good
condition
–
I do not
drive along
Halcyon
Road
–
Customize Export

60.00% 9

20.00% 3

13.33% 2

6.67% 1
Do you agree or disagree
(strongly/somewhat) with the statement, “I
would like to walk along Halcyon Road
more than I do now.”
Answered: 15 Skipped: 2
Total 15
Strongly agree
Somewhat agree
Somewhat
disagree
Strongly
disagree
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– Strongly agree
– Somewhat agree
– Somewhat disagree
– Strongly disagree
Customize Export

Page 332 of 361 ends

92.86% 13

21.43% 3

28.57% 4

35.71% 5

85.71% 12

21.43% 3

0.00% 0
What physical improvements would
encourage you to walk more along Halcyon
Road? Please select your top three.

Answered: 14 Skipped: 3
Total Respondents: 14
New or
improved...

Traffic
calming (slo...

Benches
Lighting
Landscaping
(e.g., stree...

Improved
crosswalk...

Access
improvements...

Other
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– New or improved sidewalks
– Traffic calming (slower speeds)
– Benches
– Lighting
– Landscaping (e.g., street trees, planted areas)
– Improved crosswalk facilities
– Access improvements for people with limited mobility (ADA compliance) – Other
Customize Export
Do you agree or disagree
(strongly/somewhat) with the statement, “I
would like to bike along Halcyon Road more
than I do now.”
Answered: 15 Skipped: 2

Page 333 of 361 ends

3/13/2017 SurveyMonkey Analyze Arroyo Grande Halcyon Road Complete Streets Plan (English) https://www.surveymonkey.com/analyze/4gnzhln5_2B1y6qJuhmwrQovZp_2B_2B2ybqDPPgtoHAq6Ijo_3D 26/27 Q38

60.00% 9

20.00% 3

6.67% 1

13.33% 2
Total 15
Strongly agree
Somewhat agree
Somewhat
disagree
Strongly
disagree
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– Strongly agree
– Somewhat agree
– Somewhat disagree
– Strongly disagree
Customize Export

64.29% 9

92.86% 13

7.14% 1

21.43% 3
What physical improvements would
encourage you to bike more along Halcyon
Road? Please select your top three.

Answered: 14 Skipped: 3
New or
improved...

Traffic
calming (slo...

Benches
Lighting
Landscaping
(e.g., stree...

Improved
crosswalk...

Access
improvements...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– New or improved sidewalks
– Traffic calming (slower speeds)
– Benches
– Lighting

Page 334 of 361 ends

3/13/2017 SurveyMonkey Analyze Arroyo Grande Halcyon Road Complete Streets Plan (English) https://www.surveymonkey.com/analyze/4gnzhln5_2B1y6qJuhmwrQovZp_2B_2B2ybqDPPgtoHAq6Ijo_3D 27/27 °
Copyright © 19992017 SurveyMonkey
Community: Developers • Facebook • Twitter • LinkedIn • Our Blog • Google+ • YouTube About Us: Leadership Team • Board of Directors • Integrations • Newsroom • Office Locations • Jobs • Sitemap • Help Policies: Terms of Use • Privacy Policy • AntiSpam Policy • Security Statement • Email OptIn • Accessibility Language: English • Español • Português • Deutsch • Nederlands • Français • Русский • Italiano • Dansk • Svenska • 日本語 • 한국어 • 中文(繁體) • Türkçe • Norsk • Suomi
Q39

21.43% 3

57.14% 8

7.14% 1
Total Respondents: 14
Comments (3)
– Landscaping (e.g., street trees, planted areas)
– Improved crosswalk facilities
– Access improvements for people with limited mobility (ADA compliance) Customize Export

66.67% 6

33.33% 3

77.78% 7

44.44% 4

66.67% 6
What improvements would encourage you
to take transit to/from Halcyon Road more
often? Please select your top three.

Answered: 9 Skipped: 8
Total Respondents: 9
Comments (0)
More frequent
service
Better roadway
crossing and...

Better bus
stop ameniti...

More bus stops
Easier access
to bus route...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices – Responses –
– More frequent service
– Better roadway crossing and sidewalk access
– Better bus stop amenities (e.g., bus shelters, benches, lighting, landscaping) – More bus stops
Easier access to bus route information via website, cell phone, or LED reader board at bus stop
–

Page 335 of 361 ends

Complete Streets Plan
Appendix G
Cost Estimates

Page 336 of 361 ends

Preliminary Opinion of Costs (Capital & Support)
Halcyon Road - Context Zone 1
City of Arroyo Grande 10/12/2022
Construction Costs
No. Item Description Units Quantity Unit Cost Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
2 Remove Tree EA 3 $2,000.00 $6,000.00
3 Remove Concrete (Curb & Gutter) LF 700 $33.00 $23,100.00 4 Remove Concrete Sidewalk SQFT 3450 $8.00 $27,600.00
5 Roadway Excavation CY 180 $235.00 $42,300.00
6 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 230 $136.00 $31,280.00
7 Micro-Surfacing SY 9644 $3.60 $34,720.00
8 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 120 $200.00 $24,000.00
9 Detectable Warning Surface SQFT 135 $50.00 $6,750.00
10 Minor Concrete (Curb) LF 65 $50.00 $3,250.00
11 Minor Concrete (Curb and Gutter) LF 500 $54.00 $27,000.00 12 Minor Concrete (Curb Ramp) SQFT 625 $18.00 $11,250.00 13 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk) SQFT 5080 $12.00 $60,960.00 14 Minor Concrete (Driveway) SQFT 250 $18.00 $4,500.00
15 Reconstruct Drainage Facility LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 16 Pavement Marker (Retroreflective) EA 65 $17.00 $1,106.77 17 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 6250 $2.00 $12,500.00 18 Thermoplastic Pavement Marking SQFT 2434 $8.00 $19,472.00 19 Signs EA 13 $382.00 $4,966.00
20 Traffic Signal Replacement EA 2 $500,000.00 $1,000,000.00 21 Planting and Irrigation SQFT 0 $10.00 $0.00
22 Mobilization LS 10% $1,365,800.00 $142,830.00
23 Minor/ Supplemental Items LS 25% $1,365,800.00 $357,075.00 24 Adjust Utilities to Grade LS 1 $62,500.00 $62,500.00 Subtotal (Construction Costs) $ 1,978,159.77
Construction Contingency 25% $ 357,063.69
Total Construction Costs $ 2,335,223.46
Total Construction Budget (Rounded) $ 2,335,300.00
Right of Way (Capital) and Utility Relocation Costs:
1 Right Of Way SQFT 2830 $20.00 $56,600.00
2 Utility Relocation (by Utility Owner) ALLOW 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total Right of Way (Capital) and Utility Relocation Costs $ 56,600.00 Total Project Capital Cost $ 2,391,900.00
Project Support Costs
1 Environmental Clearance (CEQA/NEPA) Capital Costs 5% $ 119,600.00 2 PS&E Con. Costs 12% $ 280,300.00
3 Right of Way Engineering & Acquisition 3-Parcels $15k/EA $ 45,000.00 4 Construction Support and Management Con. Costs 10% $ 233,600.00 Total Project Support Costs $ 678,500.00
Total Estimated Project Costs $ 3,070,400.00
Rounded $ 3,080,000.00
Assumptions:

1. Existing power/utility poles located ouside the limits of the roundabout to remain in place. 10/12/2022 Copy of 12568619_Halcyon CS Estimate_Zone1_rev2022-10-12.xlsx

Page 337 of 361 ends

Preliminary Opinion of Costs (Capital & Support)
Halcyon Road - Context Zone 2 (outside Roundabout Option) City of Arroyo Grande 6/22/2018
0-Jan-1900
Construction Costs (Outside Roundabout limits )
No. Item Description Units Quantity Unit Cost Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
2 Remove Tree EA 0 $2,000.00 $0.00
3 Remove Concrete (Curb & Gutter) LF 110 $33.00 $3,630.00 4 Remove Concrete Sidewalk SQFT 400 $8.00 $3,200.00
5 Roadway Excavation CY 220 $235.00 $51,700.00
6 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 200 $136.00 $27,200.00
7 Micro-Surfacing SY 15133 $3.60 $54,480.00
8 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 170 $200.00 $34,000.00
9 Retaiing Wall SQFT 0 $90.00 $0.00
10 Detectable Warning Surface SQFT 150 $50.00 $7,500.00 11 Minor Concrete (Curb) LF 595 $50.00 $29,750.00
12 Minor Concrete (Curb and Gutter) LF 340 $54.00 $18,360.00 13 Minor Concrete (Curb Ramp) SQFT 615 $18.00 $11,070.00 14 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk) SQFT 2080 $12.00 $24,960.00 15 Minor Concrete (Driveway) SQFT 0 $18.00 $0.00
16 Minor Concrete (Miscellaneous Construction) SQFT 630 $20.00 $12,600.00 17 Reconstruct Drainage Facility LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 18 Pavement Marker (Retroreflective) EA 124 $17.00 $2,108.40 19 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 11906 $2.00 $23,812.50 20 Thermoplastic Pavement Marking SQFT 2098 $8.00 $16,784.00 21 Signs EA 10 $382.00 $3,820.00
22 Lighting System LS 0 $0.00 $0.00
23 Planting and Irrigation SQFT 1265 $10.00 $12,650.00
24 Mobilization LS 10% $425,200.00 $42,520.00
25 Minor/ Supplemental Items LS 25% $425,200.00 $106,300.00 26 Adjust Utilities to Grade LS 1 $62,500.00 $62,500.00 Subtotal (Construction Costs) $ 623,944.90
Construction Contingency 25% 106,281.22 $
Total Construction Costs 730,226.12 $
Total Construction Budget (Rounded) 730,300.00 $
Right of Way (Capital) and Utility Relocation Costs (Outside Roundabout Limits) 1 Right Of Way SQFT 1050 $20.00 $21,000.00
2 Utility Relocation (by Utility Owner) ALLOW 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total Right of Way (Capital) and Utility Relocation Costs 21,000.00 $ Total Project Capital Cost 751,300.00 $
Project Support Costs (Outside Roundabout Limits )
1 Environmental Clearance (CEQA/NEPA) Capital Costs 5% $ 37,600.00 2 PS&E Con. Costs 12% $ 87,700.00
3 Right of Way Engineering & Acquisition 2-Parcels $15k/EA $ 30,000.00 4 Construction Support and Management Con. Costs 10% $ 73,100.00 Total Project Support Costs 228,400.00 $
Total Estimated Project Costs 979,700.00 $
Rounded $ 980,000.00
Assuptions:

1. Existing power/utility poles located outside the limits of the roundabout to remain in place. 12/22/2022 12568619_Halcyon CS Estimate_Zone2 Outside RAB_rev0610.xlsx

Page 338 of 361 ends

Preliminary Opinion of Costs (Capital & Support)
Fair Oaks Avenue / Halcyon Road Intersection Alt with Road Diet - Context Zone 2 City of Arroyo Grande 10/12/2022
Construction Costs (Signal only )
No. Item Description Units Quantity Unit Cost Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00
2 Remove Tree EA 3 $2,000.00 $6,000.00
3 Remove Concrete (Curb & Gutter) LF 291 $33.00 $9,592.77 4 Remove Concrete Sidewalk SQFT 2000 $8.00 $16,000.00
5 Roadway Excavation CY 120 $235.00 $28,200.00
6 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 100 $136.00 $13,600.00
7 Micro-Surfacing SY 6155 $3.60 $22,159.47
8 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 70 $200.00 $14,000.00
9 Retaining Wall SQFT 0 $120.00 $0.00
10 Detectable Warning Surface SQFT 113 $50.00 $5,646.50 11 Minor Concrete (Curb) LF 0 $50.00 $0.00
12 Minor Concrete (Curb - Ramp) SQFT 420 $18.00 $7,560.00 13 Minor Concrete (Curb and Gutter) LF 286 $54.00 $15,419.16 14 Minor Concrete (Stamped Concrete - Truck Apron) CY 0 $1,200.00 $0.00 15 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk) SQFT 1330 $12.00 $15,965.49 16 Minor Concrete (Cross Gutter) SQFT 0 $25.00 $0.00
17 Minor Concrete (Driveway) SQFT 0 $18.00 $0.00
18 Drainage Facilities LS 1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00
19 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 6634 $2.00 $13,267.28 20 Thermoplastic Pavement Marking SQFT 5925 $8.00 $47,397.89 21 Signs EA 12 $382.00 $4,584.00
22 Traffic Signal replacement EA 1 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 23 Planting and Irrigation SQFT 0 $10.00 $0.00
24 Mobilization LS 10% $809,400.00 $80,940.00
25 Minor/ Supplemental Items % 25% $809,400.00 $202,350.00 26 Adjust Utilities LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
26 Relocate Backflow and Water Meter EA 0 $30,000.00 $0.00 Subtotal (Construction Costs) $ 1,192,682.56
Construction Contingency 25% 298,170.64 $
Total Construction Costs 1,490,853.20 $
Total Construction Budget (Rounded) 1,490,900.00 $
Right of Way (Capital) and Utility Relocation Costs (Signal Only):
1 Right Of Way SQFT 100 $20.00 $2,000.00
2 Utility Relocation (by Utility Owner) ALLOW 0 $300,000.00 $0.00 Total Right of Way (Capital) and Utility Relocation Costs 2,000.00 $ Total Project Capital Cost 1,492,900.00 $
Project Support Costs (Roundabout Only )
1 Environmental Clearance (CEQA/NEPA) Capital Costs 5% $ 74,700.00 2 PS&E Con. Costs 7.5% $ 111,900.00
3 Right of Way Engineering & Acquisition 1-parcel $15k/EA $ 15,000.00 4 Construction Support and Management Con. Costs 10% $ 149,100.00 Total Project Support Costs 350,700.00 $
Total Estimated Project Costs 1,843,600.00 $
Rounded $ 1,850,000.00
12/22/2022 12568619_Halcyon CS Estimate_Zone2 Signal Alternative_2.xlsx

Page 339 of 361 ends

Preliminary Opinion of Costs (Capital & Support)
Fair Oaks Avenue / Halcyon Road ROUNDABOUT - Context Zone 2 City of Arroyo Grande 5/16/2022
0-Jan-1900
Construction Costs (Roundabout only ) updated 6/22/18_DZ No. Item Description Units Quantity Unit Cost Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $200,000.00 $200,000.00
2 Remove Tree EA 9 $2,000.00 $18,000.00
3 Remove Concrete (Curb & Gutter) LF 1410 $33.00 $46,530.00 4 Remove Concrete Sidewalk SQFT 7640 $8.00 $61,120.00
5 Roadway Excavation CY 1620 $235.00 $380,700.00
6 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 1130 $136.00 $153,680.00
7 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 930 $200.00 $186,000.00
9 Detectable Warning Surface SQFT 480 $50.00 $24,000.00 10 Minor Concrete (Curb) LF 1040 $50.00 $51,995.50
11 Minor Concrete (Curb - Truck Apron) CY 14 $700.00 $9,800.00 12 Minor Concrete (Curb and Gutter) LF 1344 $54.00 $72,570.06 13 Minor Concrete (Stamped Concrete - Truck Apron) CY 50 $1,200.00 $60,000.00 14 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk) SQFT 10986 $12.00 $131,836.44 15 Minor Concrete (Bus Pad) SQFT 1639 $25.00 $40,985.25 16 Minor Concrete (Driveway) SQFT 388 $18.00 $6,978.06
17 Reconstruct Drainage Facility LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 18 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 6300 $2.00 $12,600.00 19 Thermoplastic Pavement Marking SQFT 244 $8.00 $1,952.00 20 Signs EA 50 $382.00 $19,100.00
21 Lighting System LS 1 $112,500.00 $112,500.00
22 Planting and Irrigation SQFT 10400 $10.00 $104,000.00 23 Mobilization LS 10% $1,631,900.00 $163,190.00
24 Minor/ Supplemental Items LS 25% $1,631,900.00 $407,975.00 25 Adjust Utilities to Grade LS 1 $62,500.00 $62,500.00 Subtotal (Construction Costs) $ 2,403,012.31
Construction Contingency 25% 407,961.83 $
Total Construction Costs 2,810,974.14 $
Total Construction Budget (Rounded) 2,811,000.00 $
Right of Way (Capital) and Utility Relocation Costs (Roundabout Only):
1 Right Of Way SQFT 9260 $20.00 $185,200.00
2 Utility Relocation (by Utility Owner) ALLOW 1 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 Total Right of Way (Capital) and Utility Relocation Costs 385,200.00 $ Total Project Capital Cost 3,196,200.00 $
Project Support Costs (Roundabout Only )
1 Environmental Clearance (CEQA/NEPA) Capital Costs 5% $ 159,900.00 2 PS&E Con. Costs 7.5% $ 210,900.00
3 Right of Way Engineering & Acquisition 4-Parcels $15k/EA $ 60,000.00 4 Construction Support and Management Con. Costs 10% $ 281,100.00 Total Project Support Costs 711,900.00 $
Total Estimated Project Costs 3,908,100.00 $
Rounded $ 3,910,000.00
12/22/2022 12568619_Halcyon CS Estimate_Zone2 RAB_rev0610.xlsx

Page 340 of 361 ends

Preliminary Opinion of Costs (Capital & Support)
Halcyon Road - Context Zone 3
City of Arroyo Grande 5/16/2022
Construction Costs
No. Item Description Units Quantity Unit Cost Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $42,000.00 $42,000.00
2 Remove Tree EA 4 $2,000.00 $8,000.00
3 Remove Concrete (Curb & Gutter) LF 750 $33.00 $24,750.00 4 Remove Concrete Sidewalk SQFT 3270 $8.00 $26,160.00
5 Roadway Excavation CY 190 $235.00 $44,650.00
6 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 290 $136.00 $39,440.00
7 Micro-Surfacing SY 12134 $3.60 $43,681.96
8 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 140 $200.00 $28,000.00
9 Retaining Wall SQFT 1250 $120.00 $150,000.00
10 Detectable Warning Surface SQFT 276 $50.00 $13,800.00 11 Minor Concrete (Curb) LF 710 $50.00 $35,500.00
12 Minor Concrete (Curb and Gutter) LF 805 $54.00 $43,470.00 13 Minor Concrete (Curb Ramp) SQFT 5600 $18.00 $100,800.00 14 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk) SQFT 4583 $12.00 $54,996.00 15 Minor Concrete (Driveway) SQFT 347 $18.00 $6,246.00
16 Minor Concrete (Miscellaneous Construction) SQFT 1400 $20.00 $28,000.00 17 Reconstruct Drainage Facility LS 1 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 18 Pavement Marker (Retroreflective) EA 96 $17.00 $1,632.00 19 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 9203 $2.00 $18,406.00 20 Thermoplastic Pavement Marking SQFT 3075 $8.00 $24,602.00 21 Signs EA 12 $382.00 $4,584.00
22 Signals/Lighting - Rapid Flashing Beacons LS 2 $7,500.00 $15,000.00 23 Planting and Irrigation SQFT 1940 $10.00 $19,400.00
24 Mobilization LS 10% $832,200.00 $83,220.00
25 Minor/ Supplemental Items LS 25% $832,200.00 $208,050.00 26 Adjust Utilities to Grade LS 1 $56,000.00 $56,000.00 Subtotal (Construction Costs) $ 1,165,387.96
Construction Contingency 25% 208,029.49 $
Total Construction Costs 1,373,417.46 $
Total Construction Budget (Rounded) 1,373,500.00 $
Right of Way (Capital) and Utility Relocation Costs:
1 Right Of Way SQFT 1400 $20.00 $28,000.00
2 Utility Relocation (by Utility Owner) ALLOW 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total Right of Way (Capital) and Utility Relocation Costs 28,000.00 $ Total Project Capital Cost 1,401,500.00 $
Project Support Costs
1 Environmental Clearance (CEQA/NEPA) Capital Costs 5% $ 70,100.00 2 PS&E Con. Costs 12% $ 164,900.00
3 Right of Way Engineering & Acquisition 2-Parcels $15k/EA $ 30,000.00 4 Construction Support and Management Con. Costs 10% $ 137,400.00 Total Project Support Costs 402,400.00 $
Total Estimated Project Costs 1,803,900.00 $
Rounded $ 1,810,000.00
Assuptions:

1. Existing power/utility poles located outside the limits of the Roundabout to remain in place. 12/22/2022 12568619_Halcyon CS Estimate_Zone3_rev0610.xlsx

Page 341 of 361 ends

Preliminary Opinion of Costs (Capital Only)
Halcyon Road - Context Zone 3 - Fair Oaks to Virginia for SLOCOG CBG City of Arroyo Grande 5/5/2022
Construction Costs Only:

No. Item Description Units Quantity Unit Cost Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 42,000.00 $ 42,000.00 $
2 Remove Tree EA 0 2,000.00 $ - $
3 Remove Concrete (Curb & Gutter) LF 750 33.00 $ 24,750.00 $ 4 Remove Concrete Sidewalk SQFT 3270 8.00 $ 26,160.00 $ 5 Roadway Excavation CY 130 235.00 $ 30,550.00 $
6 Class 2 Aggregate Base CY 170 136.00 $ 23,120.00 $
7 Micro-Surfacing SY 12134 3.60 $ 43,682.40 $
8 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 100 200.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 9 Retaining Wall SQFT 0 120.00 $ - $
10 Detectable Warning Surface SQFT 216 50.00 $ 10,800.00 $ 11 Minor Concrete (Curb) LF 710 50.00 $ 35,500.00 $
12 Minor Concrete (Curb and Gutter) LF 148 54.00 $ 7,992.00 $ 13 Minor Concrete (Curb Ramp) SQFT 3850 18.00 $ 69,300.00 $ 14 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk) SQFT 105 12.00 $ 1,260.00 $ 15 Minor Concrete (Driveway) SQFT 0 18.00 $ - $
16 Minor Concrete (Cross Gutters) SQFT 1400 20.00 $ 28,000.00 $ 17 Storm Drain System LS 1 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $
18 Pavement Marker (Retroreflective) EA 69 17.00 $ 1,173.00 $ 19 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe LF 7000 2.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 20 Thermoplastic Pavement Marking SQFT 1750 8.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 21 Signs EA 10 382.00 $ 3,820.00 $
22 Rapid Flashing Beacons LS 2 7,500.00 $ 15,000.00 $
23 Median Zero Scape SQFT 1940 10.00 $ 19,400.00 $
24 Mobilization LS 10% 408,500.00 $ 40,850.00 $
25 Minor/ Supplemental Items LS 25% 408,500.00 $ 102,125.00 $ 26 Adjust Covers LS 1 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $
Subtotal (Construction Costs) 599,482.40 $
Construction Contingency 25% 149,870.60 $
Construction Support (CE) 0% - $
Total Construction & Support $ 749,353.00
Total Construction Budget (Rounded) $ 749,400.00
Assuptions:

1. Construction Support Not Included

Page 342 of 361 ends

Complete Streets Plan
Appendix H
LOS and Queue Reports

Page 343 of 361 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Halcyon Complete Street Plan 31: Halcyon Rd & Fair Oaks Ave Existing Conditions 2019 - AM Peak Arroyo Grande 7:30 am 11/15/2019 Existing Conditions 2019 Synchro 10 Report GHD Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 58 179 28 164 170 212 19 523 185 151 236 38 Future Volume (veh/h) 58 179 28 164 170 212 19 523 185 151 236 38 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 76 236 30 216 224 51 25 688 209 199 311 39 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 98 304 39 255 515 425 47 877 266 248 1400 174 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.19 0.19 0.14 0.28 0.28 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.14 0.44 0.44 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1623 206 1781 1870 1544 1781 2677 813 1781 3180 395 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 76 0 266 216 224 51 25 457 440 199 173 177 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1829 1781 1870 1544 1781 1777 1714 1781 1777 1798 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 0.0 11.5 9.8 8.2 2.1 1.1 19.3 19.3 9.0 5.0 5.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 0.0 11.5 9.8 8.2 2.1 1.1 19.3 19.3 9.0 5.0 5.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.22
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 98 0 343 255 515 425 47 582 561 248 782 792 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.78 0.85 0.44 0.12 0.53 0.78 0.78 0.80 0.22 0.22 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 355 0 574 355 587 485 678 646 623 678 782 792 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.6 0.0 32.0 34.6 24.7 22.5 39.8 25.2 25.2 34.5 14.4 14.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.8 0.0 1.4 9.7 0.2 0.0 10.8 7.5 7.7 7.1 0.3 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.6 0.0 5.1 4.8 3.5 0.7 0.6 9.1 8.8 4.3 2.0 2.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.4 0.0 33.4 44.3 24.9 22.5 50.6 32.7 32.9 41.7 14.7 14.7 LnGrp LOS D A CDCCDCCDBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 342 491 922 549
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.6 33.2 33.3 24.5
Approach LOS DCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.0 32.0 8.1 27.7 5.7 41.4 15.3 20.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.9 3.5 4.9 3.5 4.9 3.5 * 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 30.1 16.5 26.0 31.5 30.1 16.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.0 21.3 5.5 10.2 3.1 7.1 11.8 13.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 5.9 0.1 0.8 0.1 4.0 0.1 0.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.5
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Page 344 of 361 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Halcyon Complete Street Plan 31: Halcyon Rd & Fair Oaks Ave Existing Conditions 2019 - PM Peak Arroyo Grande 7:30 am 11/15/2019 Existing Conditions 2019 Synchro 10 Report GHD Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 28 124 17 205 181 98 18 286 172 117 487 45 Future Volume (veh/h) 28 124 17 205 181 98 18 286 172 117 487 45 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 29 128 14 211 187 32 19 295 103 121 502 41 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 60 226 25 269 475 391 42 676 231 166 1101 90 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.02 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1652 181 1781 1870 1540 1781 2590 884 1781 3327 271 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 29 0 142 211 187 32 19 200 198 121 267 276 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1833 1781 1870 1540 1781 1777 1697 1781 1777 1821 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 0.0 3.4 5.3 3.9 0.7 0.5 4.4 4.6 3.1 5.6 5.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 0.0 3.4 5.3 3.9 0.7 0.5 4.4 4.6 3.1 5.6 5.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.52 1.00 0.15
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 60 0 250 269 475 391 42 464 443 166 588 603 V/C Ratio(X) 0.49 0.00 0.57 0.79 0.39 0.08 0.46 0.43 0.45 0.73 0.45 0.46 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 627 0 1017 627 1037 854 1197 1141 1090 1197 1141 1169 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.3 0.0 18.9 19.2 14.5 13.3 22.6 14.4 14.5 20.7 12.4 12.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.3 0.0 0.8 1.9 0.2 0.0 9.1 1.5 1.7 7.2 1.3 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 1.3 2.1 1.4 0.2 0.3 1.8 1.8 1.5 2.0 2.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.5 0.0 19.7 21.1 14.7 13.4 31.7 15.9 16.1 27.9 13.6 13.6 LnGrp LOS C A B C B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 171 430 417 664
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.5 17.7 16.7 16.2
Approach LOS C B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.9 17.1 5.1 16.8 4.6 20.4 10.6 11.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.9 3.5 4.9 3.5 4.9 3.5 * 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 30.1 16.5 26.0 31.5 30.1 16.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.1 6.6 2.7 5.9 2.5 7.6 7.3 5.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 4.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 6.5 0.2 0.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.2
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Page 345 of 361 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Halcyon Complete Street Plan 31: Halcyon Rd & Fair Oaks Ave 2040 Conditions - No Build- AM Peak 10/12/2022 Synchro 10 Report
GHD
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 60 185 30 180 175 225 20 575 200 165 255 40 Future Volume (veh/h) 60 185 30 180 175 225 20 575 200 165 255 40 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 79 243 32 237 230 68 26 757 229 217 336 42 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 102 304 40 272 531 438 47 868 263 264 1417 176 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.19 0.19 0.15 0.28 0.28 0.03 0.32 0.32 0.15 0.45 0.45 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1615 213 1781 1870 1545 1781 2680 811 1781 3181 394 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 79 0 275 237 230 68 26 502 484 217 186 192 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1828 1781 1870 1545 1781 1777 1714 1781 1777 1798 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 0.0 12.9 11.7 9.0 3.0 1.3 23.9 23.9 10.6 5.8 5.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 0.0 12.9 11.7 9.0 3.0 1.3 23.9 23.9 10.6 5.8 5.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.22
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 102 0 344 272 531 438 47 576 555 264 791 801 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.80 0.87 0.43 0.16 0.55 0.87 0.87 0.82 0.24 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 327 0 529 327 541 447 624 595 574 624 791 801 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.8 0.0 34.9 37.2 26.3 24.1 43.2 28.6 28.6 37.2 15.4 15.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.6 0.0 2.4 16.9 0.2 0.1 11.5 14.4 14.8 7.6 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 5.9 6.3 4.0 1.1 0.7 12.2 11.9 5.1 2.4 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.4 0.0 37.3 54.1 26.5 24.2 54.7 43.0 43.5 44.7 15.8 15.8 LnGrp LOS D A DDCCDDDDBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 354 535 1012 595
Approach Delay, s/veh 39.3 38.4 43.5 26.4
Approach LOS DDDC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.8 34.0 8.7 30.4 5.9 45.0 17.3 21.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.9 3.5 4.9 3.5 4.9 3.5 * 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 30.1 16.5 26.0 31.5 30.1 16.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.6 25.9 5.9 11.0 3.3 7.9 13.7 14.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 3.2 0.1 0.8 0.1 4.3 0.1 0.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 37.8
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Page 346 of 361 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
31: Halcyon Rd & Fair Oaks Ave 10/12/2022
Arroyo Grande 7:30 am 11/15/2019 Existing Conditions 2019 Synchro 10 Report GHD Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 130 0 225 185 115 20 335 190 135 475 45 Future Volume (veh/h) 30 130 0 225 185 115 20 335 190 135 475 45 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 31 134 0 232 191 37 21 345 132 139 490 41 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 62 238 0 289 476 392 45 707 266 190 1203 100 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.13 0.00 0.16 0.25 0.25 0.03 0.28 0.28 0.11 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1540 1781 2517 946 1781 3320 277 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 31 134 0 232 191 37 21 242 235 139 262 269 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1540 1781 1777 1686 1781 1777 1820 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 3.5 0.0 6.5 4.4 1.0 0.6 5.9 6.1 3.9 5.7 5.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 3.5 0.0 6.5 4.4 1.0 0.6 5.9 6.1 3.9 5.7 5.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.15
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 62 238 0 289 476 392 45 499 474 190 644 659 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.56 0.00 0.80 0.40 0.09 0.47 0.48 0.50 0.73 0.41 0.41 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 565 935 0 565 935 770 1079 1029 976 1079 1029 1053 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.7 21.3 0.0 21.0 16.1 14.8 25.0 15.6 15.6 22.5 12.4 12.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.3 0.8 0.0 2.0 0.2 0.0 8.9 1.7 1.9 6.4 1.0 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 1.5 0.0 2.6 1.7 0.3 0.4 2.4 2.4 1.8 2.1 2.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.0 22.1 0.0 23.0 16.3 14.8 33.9 17.3 17.5 28.9 13.4 13.4 LnGrp LOS C C A C B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 165 460 498 670
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.0 19.5 18.1 16.6
Approach LOS C B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 19.5 5.3 18.1 4.8 23.7 11.9 11.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.9 3.5 4.9 3.5 4.9 3.5 * 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 30.1 16.5 26.0 31.5 30.1 16.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.9 8.1 2.9 6.4 2.6 7.8 8.5 5.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 5.8 0.0 0.7 0.0 6.3 0.2 0.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.4
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Page 347 of 361 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Halcyon Complete Street Plan 31: Halcyon Rd & Fair Oaks Ave 2040 Conditions - Road Diet Alt 3 - AM Peak 10/12/2022 Synchro 11 Report
GHD
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 150 220 30 180 175 225 20 485 165 165 255 40 Future Volume (veh/h) 150 220 30 180 175 225 20 485 165 165 255 40 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 197 289 34 237 230 38 26 638 125 217 336 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 224 325 38 264 413 331 44 698 586 240 904 764 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.22 0.22 0.02 0.37 0.37 0.13 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1637 193 1781 1870 1499 1781 1870 1570 1781 1870 1582 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 197 0 323 237 230 38 26 638 125 217 336 17 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1830 1781 1870 1499 1781 1870 1570 1781 1870 1582 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.5 0.0 19.8 15.1 12.6 2.3 1.7 37.4 6.2 13.8 13.0 0.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.5 0.0 19.8 15.1 12.6 2.3 1.7 37.4 6.2 13.8 13.0 0.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 224 0 363 264 413 331 44 698 586 240 904 764 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.00 0.89 0.90 0.56 0.11 0.60 0.91 0.21 0.91 0.37 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 227 0 413 271 463 371 85 732 615 240 904 764 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 49.5 0.0 44.9 48.2 39.9 35.9 55.6 34.4 24.6 49.1 18.8 15.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 28.7 0.0 17.7 28.5 0.4 0.1 14.6 16.8 0.4 34.2 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.3 0.0 10.7 8.8 5.8 0.9 0.9 20.1 2.4 8.4 5.7 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 78.2 0.0 62.6 76.7 40.3 35.9 70.3 51.1 25.0 83.4 19.4 15.6 LnGrp LOS EAEEDDEDCFBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 520 505 789 570
Approach Delay, s/veh 68.5 57.1 47.6 43.6
Approach LOS E E D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.0 47.9 18.0 30.3 6.3 60.5 20.6 27.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.9 3.5 4.9 3.5 4.9 3.5 * 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.5 45.1 14.7 28.5 5.5 55.1 17.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.8 39.4 14.5 14.6 3.7 15.0 17.1 21.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.8 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 53.2
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Page 348 of 361 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Halcyon Complete Street Plan 31: Halcyon Rd & Fair Oaks Ave 2040 Conditions with Road Diet Alt 3 - PM Peak 10/12/2022 Synchro 11 Report
GHD
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 110 175 15 225 185 115 20 255 145 135 475 45 Future Volume (veh/h) 110 175 15 225 185 115 20 255 145 135 475 45 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 113 180 13 232 191 29 21 263 41 139 490 18 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 146 275 20 283 443 356 44 566 474 183 712 602 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.24 0.24 0.02 0.30 0.30 0.10 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1719 124 1781 1870 1505 1781 1870 1567 1781 1870 1581 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 113 0 193 232 191 29 21 263 41 139 490 18 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1843 1781 1870 1505 1781 1870 1567 1781 1870 1581 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.8 0.0 6.0 7.7 5.3 0.9 0.7 6.9 1.1 4.6 13.4 0.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.8 0.0 6.0 7.7 5.3 0.9 0.7 6.9 1.1 4.6 13.4 0.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 146 0 295 283 443 356 44 566 474 183 712 602 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.65 0.82 0.43 0.08 0.48 0.46 0.09 0.76 0.69 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 430 0 787 512 875 704 161 1385 1160 453 1693 1431 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.4 0.0 24.0 24.8 19.8 18.1 29.3 17.2 15.2 26.6 15.8 11.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 0.0 0.9 2.2 0.2 0.0 9.5 1.4 0.2 7.7 2.8 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.7 0.0 2.5 3.2 2.2 0.3 0.4 3.0 0.4 2.2 5.6 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.6 0.0 24.9 27.0 20.0 18.1 38.8 18.6 15.4 34.2 18.6 11.9 LnGrp LOS C A C C B B D B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 306 452 325 647
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.0 23.5 19.5 21.8
Approach LOS C C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.7 23.3 8.5 19.3 5.0 28.1 13.2 14.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.9 3.5 4.9 3.5 4.9 3.5 * 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.5 45.1 14.7 28.5 5.5 55.1 17.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.6 8.9 5.8 7.3 2.7 15.4 9.7 8.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 4.0 0.1 0.7 0.0 7.8 0.2 0.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.7
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Page 349 of 361 ends

Queuing and Blocking Report Halcyon Complete Street Plan 2040 Conditions - No Build 2040 Conditions - No Build - AM Peak 10/12/2022 SimTraffic Report
GHD
Intersection: 31: Halcyon Rd & Fair Oaks Ave
Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB B66 B66 SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T R L T TR T T L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 94 238 125 972 125 117 213 204 170 207 164 275 Average Queue (ft) 49 121 104 274 84 29 154 165 33 44 98 100 95th Queue (ft) 99 213 146 738 147 91 222 219 124 153 165 217 Link Distance (ft) 1278 1650 118 118 509 509 1126
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 25 31
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 105 129
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70 70 100 85 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 6 26 40 21 1 0 34 10 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 14 16 165 89 5 0 7 14 9
Intersection: 31: Halcyon Rd & Fair Oaks Ave
Movement SB
Directions Served TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 96
Average Queue (ft) 13
95th Queue (ft) 61
Link Distance (ft) 1126
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)

Page 350 of 361 ends

Queuing and Blocking Report Halcyon Complete Street Plan 2040 Conditions - Road Diet Signal Alt - AM Peak
10/12/2022 SimTraffic Report
GHD
Intersection: 31: Halcyon Rd & Fair Oaks Ave
Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T R L T R L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 476 290 442 125 237 703 175 265 283 134 Average Queue (ft) 116 176 136 142 81 25 330 111 129 101 20 95th Queue (ft) 195 371 255 353 142 125 622 221 238 217 71 Link Distance (ft) 1279 1652 684 1598
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 9
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 250 100 450 150 250 110
Storage Blk Time (%) 9 12 4 10 5 29 0360
Queuing Penalty (veh) 26 20 18 45 21 57 1 11 14 0

Page 351 of 361 ends

Queuing and Blocking Report 2040 Conditions with Road Diet Alt 3 PM Peak
10/12/2022 SimTraffic Report
GHD
Intersection: 31: Halcyon Rd & Fair Oaks Ave
Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L T R L T R L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 149 225 252 262 125 56 269 175 203 294 135 Average Queue (ft) 74 96 140 96 52 19 117 57 81 170 34
95th Queue (ft) 135 178 228 186 118 48 211 128 154 279 120 Link Distance (ft) 1279 1652 684 1598
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 250 100 450 150 250 110
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 2 1 6 0 4 0 0 19 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 3 3 19 0 6 0 0 35 0

Page 352 of 361 ends

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Halcyon Rd at Fair Oaks Ave_2040 AM Peak (Site Folder: RNDBT)]
Halcyon Rd at Fair Oaks Ave
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: Halcyon Road
Lane 1d 728 2.0 841 0.866 100 19.4 LOS B 15.1 382.4 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 728 2.0 0.866 19.4 LOS B 15.1 382.4
East: Fair Oaks Avenue
Lane 1d 444 2.0 936 0.474 100 11.1 LOS B 4.3 108.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 281 2.0 708 0.397 100 8.9 LOS A 2.9 73.4 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 725 2.0 0.474 10.2 LOS B 4.3 108.0
North: Halcyon Road
Lane 1d 575 2.0 986 0.583 100 9.6 LOS A 5.2 133.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 575 2.0 0.583 9.6 LOS A 5.2 133.0
West: Fair Oaks Avenue
Lane 1d 500 2.0 770 0.650 100 15.2 LOS B 7.0 177.7 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 500 2.0 0.650 15.2 LOS B 7.0 177.7
Intersection 2528 2.0 0.866 13.7 LOS B 15.1 382.4
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
South: Halcyon Road
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From S
To Exit: W N E
Lane 1 22 527 179 728 2.0 841 0.866 100 NA NA
Approach 22 527 179 728 2.0 0.866
East: Fair Oaks Avenue
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From E
To Exit: S W N
Lane 1 225 219 - 444 2.0 936 0.474 100 NA NA

Page 353 of 361 ends

Lane 2 - - 281 281 2.0 708 0.397 100 0.0 1
Approach 225 219 281 725 2.0 0.474
North: Halcyon Road
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From N
To Exit: E S W
Lane 1 206 319 50 575 2.0 986 0.583 100 NA NA
Approach 206 319 50 575 2.0 0.583
West: Fair Oaks Avenue
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From W
To Exit: N E S
Lane 1 188 275 38 500 2.0 770 0.650 100 NA NA
Approach 188 275 38 500 2.0 0.650
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 2528 2.0 0.866
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
South Exit: Halcyon Road
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

East Exit: Fair Oaks Avenue
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

North Exit: Halcyon Road
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

West Exit: Fair Oaks Avenue
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD INC. | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Saturday, December 3, 2022 11:41:22 AM Project: \\ghdnet\ghd\US\Sacramento - 2200 21st\Projects\561\12568619\Tech\Sidra\2040 Redistribution_Halcyon Rd and Fair Oaks Ave_WBR_Ver03.sip9

Page 354 of 361 ends

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 1 [Halcyon Rd at Fair Oaks Ave_2040 PM Peak (Site Folder: RNDBT)]
Halcyon Rd at Fair Oaks Ave
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
South: Halcyon Road
Lane 1d 457 2.0 969 0.471 100 7.1 LOS A 3.5 89.4 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 457 2.0 0.471 7.1 LOS A 3.5 89.4
East: Fair Oaks Avenue
Lane 1d 446 2.0 1262 0.353 100 8.9 LOS A 2.5 63.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 125 2.0 879 0.142 100 6.5 LOS A 0.8 19.7 Short 200 0.0 NA Approach 571 2.0 0.353 8.4 LOS A 2.5 63.3
North: Halcyon Road
Lane 1d 712 2.0 978 0.728 100 12.0 LOS B 9.2 232.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 712 2.0 0.728 12.0 LOS B 9.2 232.8
West: Fair Oaks Avenue
Lane 1d 326 2.0 589 0.553 100 16.7 LOS B 5.3 135.1 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 326 2.0 0.553 16.7 LOS B 5.3 135.1
Intersection 2065 2.0 0.728 10.7 LOS B 9.2 232.8
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From S
To Exit: W N E
Lane 1 22 277 158 457 2.0 969 0.471 100 NA NA
Approach 22 277 158 457 2.0 0.471
East: Fair Oaks Avenue
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From E
To Exit: S W N
Lane 1 245 201 - 446 2.0 1262 0.353 100 NA NA

Page 355 of 361 ends

Lane 2 - - 125 125 2.0 879 0.142 100 0.0 1
Approach 245 201 125 571 2.0 0.353
North: Halcyon Road
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From N
To Exit: E S W
Lane 1 147 516 49 712 2.0 978 0.728 100 NA NA
Approach 147 516 49 712 2.0 0.728
West: Fair Oaks Avenue
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From W
To Exit: N E S
Lane 1 120 190 16 326 2.0 589 0.553 100 NA NA
Approach 120 190 16 326 2.0 0.553
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 2065 2.0 0.728
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
South Exit: Halcyon Road
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

East Exit: Fair Oaks Avenue
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

North Exit: Halcyon Road
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

West Exit: Fair Oaks Avenue
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: GHD INC. | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise | Processed: Saturday, December 3, 2022 11:41:37 AM Project: \\ghdnet\ghd\US\Sacramento - 2200 21st\Projects\561\12568619\Tech\Sidra\2040 Redistribution_Halcyon Rd and Fair Oaks Ave_WBR_Ver03.sip9

Page 356 of 361 ends

Complete Streets Plan ghd.com The Power of Commitment Page 357 of 361 ATTACHMENT 2
Proposed Schedule/Plan - Halcyon Complete Streets
City Council Update Study Session ..........................…………….March 14, 2023  Update only, show alternatives, proposed schedule and outreach plan Circulate IS/MND for public review and comment..…………….April 3 – May 3, 2023 Re-engage stakeholders and neighborhood groups……………..April 6-10, 2023  Stakeholders Meeting*
 Halcyon Neighbors Meeting*
o Halcyon Neighborhood Group
o Residences that front Halcyon Street
Staff reviews and incorporates public comments.....……………Late April 2023 Planning Commission for recommendation to CC...……………May 2023 City Council consideration of Plan and adoption of MND……..May/June 2023 Public Outreach Plan
*Stakeholders & Halcyon Neighborhood Group – Schedule meetings in April but reach out to participants beginning in March

Page 358 of 361 ends

MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Jessica Matson, Legislative & Information Services Director/City Clerk SUBJECT: Supplemental Information
Agenda Item 12.c – Halcyon Complete Streets Plan Update DATE: March 14, 2023
Attached is correspondence received before 4 PM for the above referenced item. cc: City Manager
Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director
Community Development Director
City Attorney
City Clerk
City Website (or public review binder)

Page 359 of 361 ends

From: Jim Dececco <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2023 11:47 AM
To: Brian Pedrotti; Jim Empey; Caren Ray Russom
Cc: Andrew Perez; Steve Kahn
Subject: Re: Update for Halcyon Complete Streets Plan - Arroyo Grande Brian and Company,
I have looked over the plan, and I have a couple of comments:

First, I hope that during any public presentation Level of Service will be minimized. LOS is an outdated ranking system that grades the level of comfort for drivers. An example for Mr.

Empey is a Grade of A, would be for freeways where drivers are not impaired in any way.

Complete freedom to go fast without stopping. For a city street this type of grading system is not appropriate because we don't want to grade the level of comfort for drivers. We want all users (pedestrians, transit, bikes and motorists) to feel comfortable on the road (which later sections of the plan do a very nice job of covering).

Second, I hate to be critical because there are some really good aspects of the plan, but the intersection of Grand and Halcyon is dangerous before and after the redesign. A pedestrian has to cross 60 feet (or more) of asphalt to get across Grand Ave. without an island or refuge.

Would you want your 80 year old grandmother to cross that intersection? If the answer is "no", then there is a huge problem. If the goal is greater safety, then this intersection needs to be improved. All lane widths leading to the intersection should be 11 feet wide, so drivers feel the discomfort of coming to an intersection. Get rid of the "right turn" lanes, and make the corners of the intersection extend farther into the street (bulbouts). Would I want my 12 year old son riding home from school on Halcyon, going toward 101, trying to merge into the green

Page 360 of 361 ends

painted bike lane while cars are jockeying for position in the right turn lane? No. I want my son to be able to ride straight and wait at a protected intersection to cross Grand Ave.

Third, I fully support a round-a-bout. As designed there is no space for cyclists. With the volume of traffic going through that intersection, there needs to be dedicated space for cyclists. Having cyclists go onto the sidewalk with pedestrians is dangerous for pedestrians and should not be an option. I have included a short (20 seconds) video (below) of a roundabout with a bike lane. Super easy.

Fourth, if a roundabout is out of the plan, then the lighted intersection needs to be upgraded.

Rather than the traffic light being on the opposite side of the intersection, the traffic light should be in front of the crosswalk. That way motorists are forced to stay behind the crosswalk in order to see the light
(https://link.edgepilot.com/s/0c916a95/2QsCAysjf0C5xupXnMV1tQ? u=https://sf.streetsblog.org/2017/03/23/traffic-signal-placement-are-we-doing-it-wrong/).

Also, lane widths should be 11 feet within 1/4 mile of the intersection to slow up traffic.

Because this intersection is in front of a school, there should be a protected bike lane (class 4) leading to the intersection with no "right hand" turn lane. That means it could be a protected intersection like the great example you gave on page 28.

This is a very good plan that could be made into a great plan with some modification. The four elements of traffic design as I see it are: Safety, cost, volume and speed (in those orders). I have included some other interesting videos to keep in mind. I hope my comments have helped.

Jim DeCecco
Former Safe Routes Director
Lucia Mar Unified School District
https://link.edgepilot.com/s/a9020784/p32iXHx5IkCpLYaBdf2aRA? u=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knbVWXzL4-4
https://link.edgepilot.com/s/8168f172/q9zV3sRul0icix8KM_Ppaw? u=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ByEBjf9ktY%26t=51s

Page 361 of 361 ends

Arroyo Grande City CouncilMarch 14, 2023

Arroyo Grande City Council
March 14, 2023