Agenda — Bakersfield City Council, December 17, 2025 (part 1 of 5)

BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING

December 17, 2025, 5:15 p.m.

Council Chambers, City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue

1. ROLL CALL

2. INVOCATION

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. PRESENTATIONS

5. PUBLIC STATEMENTS

5.a Non-Agenda Item Public Statements

5.b Agenda Item Public Statements

6. APPOINTMENTS

6.a One appointment (at-large) to the Fire Civil Services Commission due to a term expiration on December 31, 2025
of Thomas Edmonds.

Staff recommends Council determination.

6.b Two appointments (at large) to the Miscellaneous Civil Service Commission due to term expirations on December 31, 2025
of Patrick Bowers and James Hay
Staff recommends Council consideration.

6.c Two appointments to the Keep Bakersfield Beautiful Committee (Ward 1 Regular Member and Ward 7 Alternate Member)
due to the resignations of Paul Yanez (Ward 7) alternate member and Noe Garcia (Ward 1) regular member
Staff recommends Council determination.

6.d One appointment (at large) to the Kern Mosquito and Vector Control District due to a term expiration on December 31, 2025
of Florn Core.

Staff recommends City Council determination.

6.e One appointment to the North of the River Recreation and Parks District due to a term expiration on December 31, 2025
of Charles M. Howard.

Staff recommends Council determination.

7. CONSENT CALENDAR

7.a Minutes

7.a.1 Approval of minutes of the November 19, 2025, Regular City Council Meeting.

Staff recommends approval of the minutes.

7.b Department Payments and Agreements

7.b.1 Receive and file payments from November 7, 2025 to December 4, 2025 totaling $44,624,262.18
as follows: department payments in the amount of $42,862,999.69, and Self Insurance payments in the amount of $1,761,262.49.

Staff recommends receiving and filing the report.

7.b.2 Receive and file department agreements over $40,000 and under $100,000 between November 7, 2025
and December 4, 2025.

Staff recommends receiving and filing the report.

7.c Ordinances

7.c.1 First reading of Zone Change No. 25-0001 and adoption of its proposed mitigated negative declaration
McIntosh & Associates, representing Camino Media Properties, LLC, is proposing a Zone Change on 11.22 acres generally located at 9700 Camino Media. The request includes:

Resolution adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

1. First Reading of an ordinance amending Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code by changing the official zoning classification from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit
Development) to R-4 (High Density Multi-Unit Dwelling) zone. (Ward 5)

2. Staff recommends approval of the resolution and first reading of the ordinance.

7.c.2 Adoption of an ordinance amending Sections 15.66.020, 15.66.060 and

15.66.080 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code
relating to Drilling for and Production of Petroleum. (FR 11/5/25) Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance.

7.d Resolutions

7.d.1 Resolution to authorize the sale of a surplus riding lawn mower (equipment) to the Bakersfield Police Activities League (BPAL), a non-profit organization, for one dollar ($1.00).

Staff recommends approval of the resolution.

Page 2 of 1987 ends

7.d.2 Resolution authorizing the City of Bakersfield to submit a joint application with Community Action Partnership of Kern (CAPK) to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for the Homekey+ program (not to exceed $35,000,000) to develop services and Permanent Supportive Housing at 901 Union Avenue. (Ward 2) Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.

7.d.3 Property Abatement Resolution for November 2025
Resolution confirming approval by the City Manager designee of the Code Enforcement Manager’s report regarding assessments of certain properties in the City for which structures have been secured against entry or for the abatement of certain weeds, debris and waste matter and the demolishment of dangerous buildings and authorizing collection of the assessments by the Kern County Tax Collector.

Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.

7.d.4 Dispense with bidding for the purchase of a stencil truck for the General Services Division
Resolution determining that a stencil truck can most efficiently be obtained through cooperative procurement bidding procedures from National Auto Fleet Group and authorizing the Finance Director to dispense with bidding for the purchase of one (1) unit in the amount of $170,785 for the General Services Division within the Public Works Department.

Staff recommend adoption of the resolution and approval of the purchase.

7.d.5 Dispense with bidding for the purchase of a cone setting truck for the General Services Division
Resolution determining that a cone setting truck can most efficiently be obtained through cooperative procurement bidding procedures from National Auto Fleet Group and authorizing the Finance Director to dispense with bidding for the purchase of one (1) unit in the amount of $124,887 for the General Services Division within the Public Works Department.

Staff recommend adoption of the resolution and approval of the purchase.

7.d.6 Resolutions of Intention 2250 and 2251 to add Areas 5-144 and 4-319 to the Consolidated Maintenance District
and preliminarily approving, confirming, and adopting the Public Works Director’s Report for each:

ROI No. 2250 adding Area 5-144 (3501 Meeks Ave.): Street Tier = 0; Park Tier = 0 – (Ward 1)

1. ROI No. 2251 adding Area 4-319 (238 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Blvd.): Street Tier = 2; Park Tier = 0.5 – (Ward 2)

2. Staff recommends adopting the resolutions of intention.

Page 3 of 1987 ends

7.d.7 Job Specification and Salary Resolution Updates 12.17.25 Revised Job Specifications: Assistant Planner #25040, Economic & Community Development Specialist #25065, Economic &
Community Development Coordinator #25055, Economic &
Community Development Technician #25025, Economic &
Community Development Supervisor #59895.

1. New Job Specifications: Permit Services Supervisor 59885, Mobility Planner 27090, Hydrographer 25310, and Senior Wastewater Plant Mechanic 14215

2. Amendment No. 11 to Resolution No. 052-23 approving
Memorandum of Understanding for employees of the Blue and White Collar Units and adopting salary schedule and related benefits.

3. Amendment No. 18 to Resolution No. 098-23 setting salaries and related benefits for officers and employees of the General Supervisory and Management Units and adopting salary schedule and related benefits.

4. Amendment No. 45 to Resolution No. 44-93 setting salaries and related benefits for the Temporary Unit.

5. Staff recommends approval of the new and revised job specifications and adoption of the Resolutions.

7.d.8 Resolutions Approving Salaries and Benefits for Related Units Resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding for employees of the Blue and White Collar Units and adopting salary schedule and related benefits.

1. Resolution setting salaries and related benefits for officers and employees of the General Supervisory and Management Units.

2. Amendment No. 46 to Resolution No. 44-93 setting salaries and related benefits for the Temporary Unit.

3. Staff recommends adoption of the Resolutions.

7.e Agreements

7.e.1 Termination of Agreement No. 2023-067 with Kern County Black Chamber of Commerce
Staff recommends termination of the agreement.

7.e.2 Agreement with Routeware Inc. (not to exceed $630,000), for Route Management Optimization technology.

Staff recommends approval of the agreement.

7.e.3 Agreement with DataTicket Inc. (compensation for service provided varies) to provide for the processing of bails, fines and forfeiture thereof, in connection with the issuance of administrative citations and other civil debts.

Staff recommend approval of the agreement.

Page 4 of 1987 ends

7.e.4 Agreement with Bakersfield City School District (compensation to the city not to exceed $118,000)
to provide School Resource Officer services and a termination date of July 31, 2026. (Ward 2)
Staff recommends approval of the agreement.

7.e.5 Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Round 5 Agreements with The Mission at Kern County and Flood Ministries
HHAP-5 Agreement (not to exceed $350,000) with The Mission at Kern County for Emergency Shelter Operations.

1. HHAP-5 Agreement (not to exceed $300,000) with Flood Bakersfield Ministries for Street Outreach

2. Staff recommends approval of the agreements.

7.e.6 Final Map, Improvement Agreement, and Landscape Agreement with Jeremy Willer Construction, Inc. for Tract 6426 Phase 4 Developer is requesting to enter into agreements so the final map for Tract 6426 Phase 4 located south of Paladino Drive and west of Rivani Drive, can be approved and recorded. (Ward 3)
Staff recommends approval of the Final Map, Improvement Agreement, and Landscape Agreement.

7.e.7 Final Map, Improvement Agreement, and Landscape Agreement with BN Bakersfield 1, LP Tract 7093 Phase 1
Developer is requesting to enter into agreements so the final map for Tract 7093 Phase 1 located northwest corner of Olive Drive and Allen Road can be approved and recorded. (Ward 4)
Staff recommends approval of the Final Map, Improvement Agreement, and Landscape Agreement.

7.e.8 Final Map and Private Improvement Agreement with Castle Cooke California, Inc. for Tract 7356 Unit 1
Developer is requesting to enter into an agreement so the final map for Tract 7356 Unit 1 located south of Ming Avenue and west of Rutherford Park Avenue can be approved and recorded. (Ward 5)
Staff recommends approval of the Final Map and Private Improvement Agreement.

7.e.9 Final Map and Private Improvement Agreement with Castle Cooke California, Inc. for Tract 7356 Unit 2
Developer is requesting to enter into an agreement so the final map for Tract 7356 Unit 2 located south of Ming Avenue and west of Rutherford Park Avenue can be approved and recorded. (Ward 5)
Staff recommends approval of the Final Map and Private Improvement Agreement.

Page 5 of 1987 ends

7.e.10 Agreement for On Call Services for General Electrical Services and Electrical Maintenance

1. A-C Electric Construction (not to exceed $650,000)

2. Braun Electric Company, Inc., (not to exceed $650,000)

3. Telstar (not to exceed $300,000)
Staff recommends approval of all three agreements.

7.e.11 Design Consultant Agreement with Provost and Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc.
dba Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group ($374,500), for Street Improvements along Panama Lane and South Allen Road (McAllister Ranch Boundary). (Ward 5)
Staff recommends the approval of the agreement.

7.e.12 Agreement with Silvas Oil Company, Inc. (not to exceed $1,500,000), for providing bobtail/partial truck load quantities of gasoline and diesel fuels.

Staff recommend approval of the agreement.

7.e.13 Amendment No. 2 to Settlement and Release Agreement with Rosedale Rio Bravo Water Storage District.

Staff recommend approval of the amendment.

7.e.14 Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2021-282 with Cannon (increase compensation $350,000; revised not to exceed $1,000,000 and extend the term to December 31, 2026) for the Programmable Logic Controller Upgrade Project.

Staff recommends approval of the amendment.

7.e.15 Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2022-155
with Highstreet IT Solutions (increase compensation $148,700; revised not to exceed $4,749,950) to add additional functionality and user licenses for the Enterprise Performance Management module for Oracle Financials.

Staff recommends approval of the amendment.

7.e.16 Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 2023-079
Assignment of Long-Term Ground Lease with Braly Properties (White Lane) to assign the rights and obligations of Braly Properties (White Lane) to City Point, LLC.

Staff recommends approval of the agreement.

7.e.17 Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 2024-323
with Boys & Girls Club of Kern County (extend term to December 31, 2026, and amend scope of work) to provide funding aimed at enhancing non-profit youth organizations, facilities and expanding its capacity to serve at-risk youth.

Staff recommends approval of amendment

Page 6 of 1987 ends

7.e.18 Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2023-296 with The Open Door Network
(increase compensation $200,000; revised not-to-exceed $600,000 and extend the term to December 31, 2026) to provide clean up services for sumps, canals and basins.

Staff recommend approval of the amendment.

7.e.19 Litter Abatement Services for Clean City Initiative (CCI) Program Agreement with Jack Davenport Sweeping Services for CCI Cleanups (not to exceed $549,477).

1. Agreement with The Open Door Network for CCI Cleanups (not to exceed $567,840).

2. Agreement with The Open Door Network for Freeway Litter Program (not to exceed $238,818).

3. Staff recommends approval of the agreements.

7.e.20 Amendment No.1 to Agreement No. 2024-010
with NV5, Inc. (to revising the contractor’s schedule of hourly billing rates and extend the term of the agreement until March 31, 2026), to continue providing geotechnical and materials testing services for Capital Improvement Projects.

Staff recommends approval of the amendment.

7.e.21 Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 2022-275 MJS SOLUTIONS LLC (increase compensation by $74,000; revised not to exceed $298,000 and extend term by one year), to continue the supply of Janitorial Services at the Amtrak/Greyhound Station. (Ward 2)
Staff recommend approval of the amendment.

7.e.22 Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 2022-277 Applied LNG Technologies (extend the term by one year) to continue the supply of LNG Fuel.

Staff recommend approval of the amendment.

7.e.23 Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2023-151 with Meyer Civil Engineering Inc.
(increase compensation $50,000; revised not to exceed $310,000), for oncall civil engineering and technical support services.

Staff recommends approval of the amendment.

7.e.24 Amendments to On-Call Agreements for Construction Inspection Services Amendment No.1 to Agreement No. 2023-300 with Meyer Civil Engineering, Inc. (revising contractor’s hourly billing rates, and extending term to March 31, 2026)

1. Amendment No.1 to Agreement No. 2023-301 with NV5 Inc. (revising contractor’s schedule of hourly billing rates, and extending term to March 31, 2026)

Page 7 of 1987 ends

Amendment No.1 to Agreement No. 2023-302 with MKN &
Associates Inc. (revising contractor’s schedule of hourly billing rates, and extending term to March 31, 2026)

3. Staff recommends approval of the amendments.

7.e.25 Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2020-200 with FFP BTM Solar, LLC for the installation
of battery energy storage infrastructure at Green Waste Facility (Ward 1) Staff recommends approval of this amendment.

7.e.26 Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 2024-252 with Howden USA Company (not to exceed $110,000) to provide labor services for the Turblex blowers located at Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 3.

Staff recommend approval of the amendment.

7.e.27 Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 2025-224
with Best Weigh Scale Company, Inc. (add scale calibration and repairs), to furnish and install a truck scale at the Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) (Ward 1)
Staff recommends approval of the amendment.

7.e.28 Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2023-048 with TOOLE Design Group (extend term to December 31, 2027) for design services of the Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Corridor Enhancements Project. (Ward 2)
Staff recommends approval of the amendment.

7.e.29 Amendment No. 10 to Agreement No. 19-070
with AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (increasing compensation by $319,053.49; revised not to exceed $26,324,033.15), for additional construction management services for the Centennial Corridor Mainline Project. (Wards 1, 2 & 3)
Staff recommends approval of the amendment.

7.e.30 Amendment No. 18 to Agreement No. 14-288
with Parsons Transportation Group (Parsons) ($270,165.65; revised not to exceed $43,099,258.92) for additional support services during construction of the Centennial Corridor EB-58 to NB-99 Loop Connector Project (7th Movement).

Staff recommends approval of the amendment.

7.e.31 Southbound SR 99 to Westbound SR 58 Connector Project (8th Movement) Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 2024-311 with Parsons
Transportation Group (Parsons) ($300,000; revised not to exceed $7,204,104.85) for additional design services on the Southbound State Route 99 to Westbound State Route 58 Connector Project (8th Movement).

1. Appropriate $300,000 of Transportation Development Funds (3350) into the Public Works Department Capital Improvement Program for

Page 8 of 1987 ends

the 8th Movement Project (25PWTR02).

Staff recommends approval of the amendment and appropriation.

7.e.32 Contract Change Order No. 177 to Agreement No. 19-069 (Mainline Project) with Security Paving Company (increasing compensation by $10,000; revised not to exceed $152,235,004.59) for the Centennial Corridor Mainline Project. (Wards 1, 2, & 3)
Staff recommends approval of the change order.

7.e.33 Contract Change Order No. 33 to Agreement No. 2024-235 (7th Movement) with Granite Construction Company (increasing compensation by $50,000; revised not to exceed $27,767,444.07) for the Centennial Corridor EB58 to NB99 Loop Connector Project. (Wards 1 & 2)
Staff recommend approval of the contract change order.

7.f Bids

7.f.1 Accept bid and approve agreement to BorderLan, Inc. (not to exceed $382,500),
for Barracuda Email Protection Subscription Licenses.

Staff recommend acceptance of bid and approval of the agreement.

7.f.2 Street Corridor Improvements along 18th Street and 19th Street Accept bid and approve contract with Cen-Cal Construction ($7,521,999.00) for said project;

1. Authorize staff to approve, as necessary, up to $1,000,000 in Citycontrolled contingency for unforeseen conditions encountered during construction of said project. (Ward 2)

2. Staff recommends acceptance of low bid, approval of contract, and approval of City-controlled contingency.

7.f.3 Pedestrian Safety Improvements at Truxtun Avenue and Pine Street Accept bid and approve contract with Loop Electric, Inc. for $220,435.

1. Authorize Staff to approve, as necessary, up to $20,000 in CityControlled contingency for unforeseen conditions during construction of said project. (Ward 2)

2. Staff recommends acceptance of low bid, approval of contract and approval of City-controlled contingency.

7.f.4 Adaptive Signal Coordination Panama Lane from Parsons Way to Cottonwood Road
Accept Bid and approve contract with Loop Electric Company for $1,052,575

1. Authorize staff to approve, as necessary, up to $40,000 in Citycontrolled contingency for unforeseen conditions during construction of said project. (Ward 1)

2. Staff recommends acceptance of low bid, approval of contract, and approval

Page 9 of 1987 ends

of City-controlled contingency.

7.f.5 Downtown Part Circle Culvert Improvements at Various Locations Accept bid and approve contract with Westrock General
Engineering ($1,819,999) for said project;

1. Authorize staff to approve, as necessary, up to $100,000 in Citycontrolled contingency for unforeseen conditions encountered during construction of said project. (Ward 2)

2. Staff recommends acceptance of low bid, approval of contract, and approval of City-controlled contingency.

7.g Miscellaneous

7.g.1 Appropriate $33,700 Park Improvement Fund balance from Southwest Developer Reimbursement - Zone 1
for the reimbursement to Sierra Oak Partners, LLC for their completion of Belcourt Park. (Ward 5)
Staff recommends approval of the appropriation.

7.g.2 Appropriate $542,223.07 in federal grant funds from the USDA Forest Service and the
USDI Bureau of Land Management and $1,145,378.50 in state grant funds from the California Office of Emergency Services to the Fire Department operating budget within the General Fund for reimbursement of personnel and equipment costs on statewide master mutual aid assignments.

Staff recommends approval of the appropriation.

7.g.3 Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Compliance Report for Park Impact Fees All Wards
The Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Compliance Report for Park Impact Fees is now available for review.

7.g.4 Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Compliance Report for Bridge Crossings and Major Thoroughfare Fees
Staff recommends making available to the public the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Compliance Report for Bridge Crossings and Major Thoroughfare Fees (report will be made physically available at the Public Works Department and digitally available).

7.g.5 Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Compliance Report for Planned Drainage Area Fees
Staff recommends making available to the public the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Compliance Report for Planned Drainage Area Fees (report will be made physically available at the Public Works Department and digitally available).

7.g.6 Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Compliance Report for Planned Sewer Area Fees
Staff recommends making available to the public the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Compliance Report for Planned Sewer Area Fees (report will be made physically available at the Public Works Department and digitally

Page 10 of 1987 ends

available).

7.g.7 Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Compliance Report for Transportation Impact Fees
Staff recommends making available to the public the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Compliance Report for Transportation Impact Fees (report will be made physically available at the Public Works Department and digitally available).

7.h Successor Agency Business

7.i Public Safety/Vital Services Measure

7.i.1 Loan Agreement with Victory Family Services (not to exceed $1,000,000) for the Creation of Affordable Housing units
for Foster Transitional Youth, to purchase a ten (10) unit apartment complex at 4400 Columbus Street. (Ward 3)
Staff recommends approval of the agreement.

7.i.2 Contract Change Order No. 3 to Agreement No. 2024-318 with McDaniels Construction
($13,682.90; revised not to exceed $1,049,269.43) for the Jastro Park Pavilion Remodel Project. (Ward 2)
Staff recommends approval of the Contract Change Order.

8. CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC HEARINGS

9. HEARINGS

10. REPORTS
Public comments on each Report item will be received after Staff's presentation.

11. DEFERRED BUSINESS
Public comments on each Deferred Business item will be received after Staff’s presentation.

12. NEW BUSINESS
Public comments on each New Business item will be received after Staff's presentation.

12.a Approval of Council Committees Calendar for January through December 2026 Staff recommends approval of the calendar.

13. COUNCIL AND MAYOR STATEMENTS

14. CLOSED SESSION

15. ADJOURNMENT

Page 11 of 1987 ends

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025 AGENDA CATEGORY: Appointments TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Julie Drimakis, City Clerk
DATE: November 20, 2025
SUBJECT: One appointment (at-large) to the Fire Civil Service Commission due to a term expiration on December 31, 2025
of Thomas Edmonds.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends Council determination.

BACKGROUND:

There will be one appointment to the Fire Department Civil Service Commission due to the term expiration of Thomas Edmonds on December 31, 2025. The three-year term of the appointment will expire on December 31, 2028.

Applications have been received from:
 Thomas Edmonds (Incumbent)
 Jenny Annet Kurdi
 Tony Pallitto
 Ronald Wolfe
The Board is an advisory body to the City Council. It is composed of three members appointed by the full City Council. Members must be Bakersfield residents throughout their three-year term and shall have no connection with City government.

The Board formulates rules and regulations governing the selection, promotion, and discipline of members of the Fire Department. All applicants have been encouraged to contact each Councilmember regarding their interest and qualifications. Meetings are held the second Monday of each month at 3:00 p.m. at Fire Station No. 1 (2101 H Street).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Commissioners receive twenty-five dollars per regular meeting attended.

COUNCIL GOAL:

Safety and Resilience
Innovative and Efficient City Government
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Fire Civil Service Board Recruitment Packet 12-04-2025 Recruitment Packet for Fire Civil Service Board
Fire Civil Service Overview
The Fire Department Civil Service Board is an advisory body to the City Council. It is composed of three (3) members, appointed by the full Council.

LEGAL AUTHORITY
City Charter Section 183.

TERM
Three (3) years. Appointments are made in December.

QUALIFICATIONS
Members must be residents of the City throughout their terms, but who otherwise shall have no connection with City Government.

DUTIES
The Commission formulates rules and regulations governing the selection, promotion and discipline of members of the Fire Department.

MEETINGS
Meets the second Monday of each month at 3:00 p.m., Fire Station No. 1, 2101 H Street. All meetings are open to the public and last approximately one hour. Members may also be requested to sit on special board meetings to review disability and/or disciplinary action for another Civil Service Board within the City of Bakersfield.

REMUNERATION
Twenty-five Dollars ($25) a month when a meeting is held.

Agendas and Minutes
Agendas are available prior to the meetings. Minutes are available following approval.

View Most Recent Agendas and Minutes
STAFF
Human Resources
1600 Truxtun Avenue,
Bakersfield, CA
(661) 326-3773

MUST FILE ASSUMING OFFICE - STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTEREST FORM 700, OATH OF OFFICE FORM, AND ETHICS TRAINING IS REQUIRED.

Number of Members:3 (min) - 3 (max)
Term Length:3 Year(s)
Type:Permanent
Applicants Information
Edmonds, Thomas
Kurdi, Jenny Annet
Pallitto, Tony
Wolfe, Ronald

1/2
Application for Appointment
Prefix First Name
Jenny
Middle Name
Annet
Last Name
Kurdi
Residence Address
7404 DOS RIOS WAY
Address Line 2
City
Bakersfield
County
CA
State
CA
Zip
93309
Position(s) Sought (List in order of preference)

1. open Position 1

2. open Position 2

3. open Position 3

4. Employment
Business Title or Occupation
NA
Company
Address
Address Line 2
City County State Zip
Phone
Other Special Training or Experience
I have extensive management experience in the automotive industry and have managed high volume service departments
E-Filed
11/21/2025
12:26:21
Filing ID:
12676
2/2
Previous and present governmental and civic experience. Indicate when, position and duties None
Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield I am a citizen that wishes to take a more active role in the city and I would like to bring my management experience in hiring, promoting and training to this board.

Do you have any interests or associations which might present a conflict of interest? If yes, please explain No, I do not.

Information for City Roster and Internet
Name
Jennifer Kurdi
Address
7404 DOS RIOS WAY
Address Line 2
N/A
City
Bakersfield
State
CA
Zip
93309
Home Phone Number
(562) 298-7731
Work Phone Number E-Mail Address
[email protected]
Authorization and Release
Signature or Applicant
Jenny A Kurdi
Signature Date
11/21/2025

1/3
Application for Appointment
Prefix
Mr.

First Name
Anthony
Middle Name Last Name
Pallitto
Residence Address
2704 Loch Fern Ct.

Address Line 2
City
Bakersfield
County
Kern
State
CA
Zip
93306
Position(s) Sought (List in order of preference)

1. Fire Civil Service Board

2. 3.

4. Employment
Business Title or Occupation
Master of Science in Healthcare
Administration Program Director
Company
California State University Bakersfield
Address
9001 Stockdale Highway
Address Line 2
City
Bakersfiemd
County
Kern
State
CA
Zip
93311
Phone
Other Special Training or Experience
E-Filed
11/26/2025
12:29:43
Filing ID:
12687
2/3
Earned a Ph.D. in Public Policy and Administration, Full-time faculty at California State University Bakersfield, Department of Public Policy and Administration. Teach curriculum for the Master in Public Administration program, which covers civil service rules.

Previous and present governmental and civic experience. Indicate when, position and duties

1. 2/20/2006 to 9/17/2010: Emergency Medical Services Coordinator at the County of Kern; coordinated first-responders, ambulance, and ER services which included system protocols, disaster preparedness, and workforce planning. 2. 9/30/ 2010 to 2/7/2011:

Public Health Disaster Preparedness Coordinator at Tulare County Public Health Department; coordinated first-responders, ambulance, and hospitals services in disaster preparedness. 2/14/2011 to 10/30/2013: Administrator at Kern County Public Health Services Department; supervised 62 FTEs, worked with the Kern County Civil Service Commission on job descriptions, workforce planning, discipline due-process and resolution. Retired from the County of Kern to pursue a second career in academia where I teach public service relying on my experiences to underpin the curriculum.

Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield I'm at the altruistic level on Maslow's hierarchy of needs and wish to find ways to do things for others as my basic needs have been met: Time to give back.Additionally, I have great respect for our first-responders as I worked with them when I was a Hall Ambulance paramedic for 16 years.

Do you have any interests or associations which might present a conflict of interest? If yes, please explain No, I have not interest or associations that could be perceived as a conflict of interest.

Information for City Roster and Internet
Name
Anthony Pallitto, Ph.D.

Address
California State University, Bakersfield
Address Line 2
9001 Stockdale Highway
City
Bakersfield
State
CA
Zip
93311
Home Phone Number
(661) 864-7314
Work Phone Number
661-654-4033
E-Mail Address
[email protected]
3/3
Authorization and Release
Signature or Applicant
Anthony Pallitto
Signature Date
11/26/2025

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025 AGENDA CATEGORY: Appointments TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Julie Drimakis, Cit Clerk
DATE: December 5, 2025
SUBJECT: Two appointments (at large) to the Miscellaneous Civil Service Commission due to term expirations on December 31, 2025
of Patrick Bowers and James Hay
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends Council consideration.

BACKGROUND:

There are two vacancies on the Miscellaneous Civil Service Commission due to the term expirations of Patrick Bowers and James Hay on December 31, 2025. The three year term of this appointment will expire on December 31, 2028.

Applications for appointment have been received from:
 Hovik Beduryan
 Jerry Edwin Fernandez
 Ronald Wolf
The Board is an advisory body to the City Council. It is composed of five Board members appointed by the City Council. Board members must be Bakersfield residents throughout their term and shall have no connection with City government. The Board formulates rules and regulations governing the selection, promotion, and discipline of employees affected by Civil Service. Meetings are held the third Tuesday of each month at 3:00 p.m. in City Hall North (1600 Truxtun Avenue).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Commissioners receive twenty-five dollars per regular meeting attended.

COUNCIL GOAL:

Innovative and Efficient City Government
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Misc Civil Service Board Recruitment Packet 12-04-2025 Recruitment Packet for Miscellaneous Civil Service Board Miscellaneous Civil Service Overview
The Miscellaneous Departments Civil Service Board is an advisory body to the City Council. It is composed of five (5) members, appointed by the full Council.

Legal Authority
City Charter Section 209.

Term
Three (3) years. Appointments are made in December.

Qualifications
Members must be residents of the City throughout their terms, but who otherwise shall have no connection with City government.

Duties
The Board has the authority and responsibility to: Enforce and interpret the Miscellaneous Rules and Regulations; have charge of all matters pertaining to the preparation and conduct of examinations; formulate rules and regulations governing the procedure and conduct of trials of employees affected by Civil Service; keep minutes of the proceedings, records of its examinations and such other records as desirable and necessary to administer the Civil Service system; make an annual report to the City Council.

Meetings
Meets the third Tuesday of each month at 3:00 p.m., at City Hall North, 1600 Truxtun Avenue, First Floor, Conference Room B.

Remuneration
Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) per regular meeting attended.

Staff
Human Resources
600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(661) 326-3773

APPOINTEES MUST FILE AN ASSUMING OFFICE STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTEREST FORM 700 AND COMPLETE ETHICS TRAINING. AN OATH OF OFFICE IS ALSO REQUIRED.

Number of Members:5 (min) - 5 (max)
Term Length:3 Year(s)
Type:Permanent
Compensation:$25 Per Meeting
Applicants Information
Beduryan, Hovik
Fernandez, Jerry Edwin
Wolfe, Ronald
1/3
Application for Appointment
Prefix
Mr.

First Name
Hovik
Middle Name Last Name
Beduryan
Residence Address
10208 Huntington Downs Avenue
Address Line 2
City
Bakersfield
County
kern
State
CA
Zip
93312
Position(s) Sought (List in order of preference)

1. any vacancy

2. 3.

4. Employment
Business Title or Occupation Company
Address
Address Line 2
City County State Zip
Phone
Other Special Training or Experience
E-Filed
12/01/2025
18:35:11
Filing ID:
12700
2/3
I have extensive experience in labor representation, community organizing, and leadership development through my work in multiple unions. As a Shop Steward with UWUA Local 132, I’ve received training in contract enforcement, workplace safety, conflict resolution, and effective communication. My role as Young Workers Committee Chair has given me additional experience in event coordination, public speaking, volunteer management, and youth leadership development. As an Organizing Steward with IBEW Local 1245, I gained hands-on experience in campaign organizing, outreach strategy, and coalition building. I have also participated in civic engagement efforts, including supporting local elections, community programs, and charitable initiatives throughout Bakersfield. These combined experiences have strengthened my ability to collaborate, problem-solve, and advocate for the public—skills that translate directly to serving on a city board or commission.

Previous and present governmental and civic experience. Indicate when, position and duties Executive Board Member – Kern, Inyo & Mono Counties Central Labor Council (Present) Duties: Provide leadership and strategic direction for regional labor initiatives, support affiliated unions, participate in policy discussions affecting working families, and engage in community-based outreach and advocacy.

Shop Steward – UWUA Local 132 (Previous Term)
Duties: Represent members in workplace matters, ensure contract compliance, assist with resolving disputes, promote safety and communication, and serve as a liaison between workers and management.

Young Workers Committee Chair – UWUA Local 132 (Previous Term) Duties: Organize young worker engagement, develop leadership opportunities, coordinate volunteer events, and advocate for the needs and perspectives of earlycareer members.

Organizing Steward – IBEW Local 1245 (Current)
Duties: Support organizing campaigns, assist with outreach to new and existing members, participate in community service efforts, and promote worker solidarity across industries.

Community Volunteer – Various Local Events (Ongoing)
Duties: Participate in community cleanups, food distributions—including major Thanksgiving and holiday events—and other local service projects designed to support families and strengthen neighborhoods.

Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield 3/3
I wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield because my experience in the labor movement has shown me the impact that strong civic engagement can have on working families and our community as a whole. Through my roles as a Shop Steward and Young Workers Committee Chair for UWUA 132, as well as an Organizing Steward with IBEW 1245 and a member of the Executive Board of the Kern, Inyo & Mono Counties Central Labor Council, I’ve spent years advocating for fairness, safety, and opportunity for workers. My public service has also included volunteering in community outreach, supporting local events, and participating in efforts that uplift underserved residents. Serving on a city board or commission is a natural extension of that work. I want to bring a working-class perspective, strong problemsolving skills, and a genuine commitment to helping Bakersfield grow in a way that supports all of its residents.

Do you have any interests or associations which might present a conflict of interest? If yes, please explain no
Information for City Roster and Internet
Name
hovik beduryan
Address
10208 Huntington Downs Avenue
Address Line 2
no
City
Bakersfield
State
CA
Zip
93312
Home Phone Number
(818) 800-3058
Work Phone Number E-Mail Address
[email protected]
Authorization and Release
Signature or Applicant
hovik beduryan
Signature Date
12/01/2025

1/2
Application for Appointment
Prefix First Name
Jerry
Middle Name
Edwin
Last Name
Fernandez
Residence Address
3013 Sunview Drive
Address Line 2
City
Bakersfield
County
Kern
State
CA
Zip
93306
Position(s) Sought (List in order of preference)

1. Civil Service Board Member

2. 3.

4. Employment
Business Title or Occupation
Retired
Company
Address
3013 Sunview Drive
Address Line 2
City
Bakersfield
County
Kern
State
CA
Zip
93306
Phone
(661) 201-6056
Other Special Training or Experience
E-Filed
12/02/2025
12:56:58
Filing ID:
12708
2/2
OSHA 30, Tap Root Investigations, Why Tree investigations, Storm water certifications, previous contractors license for blasting and drilling, pumps and machines.

Previous and present governmental and civic experience. Indicate when, position and duties Currently elected member of the Democratic Central Committee since 2020-2028 Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield Offer my experiences and help out the community
Do you have any interests or associations which might present a conflict of interest? If yes, please explain None
Information for City Roster and Internet
Name
Jerry Edwin Fernandez
Address
3013 Sunview Drive
Address Line 2
N/A
City
Bakersfield
State
CA
Zip
93306
Home Phone Number
(661) 201-6056
Work Phone Number E-Mail Address
[email protected]
m
Authorization and Release
Signature or Applicant
Jerry Fernandez
Signature Date
12/02/2025

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025 AGENDA CATEGORY: Appointments TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Julie Drimakis, City Clerk
DATE: December 2, 2025
SUBJECT: Two appointments to the Keep Bakersfield Beautiful Committee (Ward 1 Regular Member and Ward 7 Alternate Member)
due to the resignations of Paul Yanez (Ward 7) alternate member and Noe Garcia (Ward 1) regular member
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends Council determination.

BACKGROUND:

There are currently two vacancies on the Keep Bakersfield Beautiful Committee (KBBC). The current vacancies are due to the resignations of Paul Yanez (Ward 7) alternate member on May 9, 2025, and Noe Garcia (Ward 1) regular member on June 7, 2025. The positions run concurrent with the nominating Councilmembers’ term expirations.

Nominations are approved by a majority vote of the entire Council. Member must be City residents throughout their term. Terms for these committee positions run concurrent with the term of the nominating Councilmember; however, it is not necessary for the Mayor/Councilmember to nominate a resident from his or her Ward. Applications for appointment to the regular and/or alternate positions have been received from the following residents:
 Hovik Beduryan
 Nayeli Franco
 Jenny Annet Kurdi
 Daniel C. Nolan
 Manuel Anthony Ramirez
 Sandy Turner
 James Howard Wheeler
KBBC was formed on June 28, 2000. The Committee is comprised of eight Mayor/Council-appointed members who take on the responsibility of decision making for the beautification program. On July 30, 2009, the City Council adopted Ordinance 4520 which allows each Councilmember and the Mayor to appoint one alternate member to the KBBC. Each alternate is allowed to vote with their corresponding appointed regular committee member.

The duties of the KBBC are to recommend policies and specific programs to the City Council which promote the Mission Statement of the KBBC, as reflected by its bylaws on file with the City Clerk. In addition, the KBBC shall actively participate in the implementation of various programs and projects to achieve the KBBC Mission Statement.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This action will not result in an impact to the City General Fund.

COUNCIL GOAL:

Innovative and Efficient City Government
ATTACHMENTS:

1. KBBC Recruitment Packet 12-04-2025
Recruitment Packet for Keep Bakersfield Beautiful Committee KBB Overview
The Keep Bakersfield Beautiful Committee (KBBC) is an advisory body to the City Council. It is composed of eight (8) board members and eight (8) alternate members appointed by the Mayor and City Council. The Mayor and each Councilmember nominate resident of the City of Bakersfield, and nominations are approved by the full Council.

LEGAL AUTHORITY
Municipal Code Section 2.62
TERM
Term runs concurrent with the nominating Councilmember’s and Mayor’s terms of office.

Appointments are made in December.

QUALIFICATIONS
Members must be residents of the City throughout their term.

DUTIES
The Keep Bakersfield Beautiful Committee recommends policies and specific programs to the City Council which promote the mission statement of the KBBC as reflected in its bylaws. The KBBC actively participates in the implementation of various programs and projects to achieve the KBBC mission statement.

The committee member and the alternate committee member will collectively hold 1 vote. If both committee and alternate committee members are present at a meeting, then they will each get 1/2 vote. If either committee or alternate committee member is absent from a meeting, then the member that is present gets 1 vote.

MEETINGS
Meetings are held on the second Friday of each month at 12:00 noon, City Hall South, Caucus Room, 1501 Truxtun Avenue.

REMUNERATION
None

AGENDAS AND MINUTES
Agendas are available prior to the meetings. Minutes are available following approval.

View the most recent Agendas and Minutes
STAFF
Solid Waste Division
4101 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93309
(661) 326-3114
Applicants Information
Beduryan, Hovik
Franco, Nayeli
Kurdi, Jenny Annet
Nolan, Daniel C
Ramirez, Manuel Anthony
Turner, Sandy
Wheeler, James Howard
1/3
Application for Appointment
Prefix
Mr.

1. any vacancy

2. 3.

4. Employment
Business Title or Occupation
Gas Service Representative
Company
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Address
Address Line 2
City County State Zip
Phone
Other Special Training or Experience
E-Filed
12/01/2025
18:23:09
Filing ID:
12697
2/3
I have extensive experience in labor representation, community organizing, and leadership development through my work in multiple unions. As a Shop Steward with UWUA Local 132, I’ve received training in contract enforcement, workplace safety, conflict resolution, and effective communication. My role as Young Workers Committee Chair has given me additional experience in event coordination, public speaking, volunteer management, and youth leadership development. As an Organizing Steward with IBEW Local 1245, I gained hands-on experience in campaign organizing, outreach strategy, and coalition building. I have also participated in civic engagement efforts, including supporting local elections, community programs, and charitable initiatives throughout Bakersfield. These combined experiences have strengthened my ability to collaborate, problem-solve, and advocate for the public skills that translate directly to serving on a city board or commission.

Community Volunteer – Various Local Events (Ongoing)
Duties: Participate in community cleanups, food distributions including major Thanksgiving and holiday events and other local service projects designed to support families and strengthen neighborhoods.

Do you have any interests or associations which might present a conflict of interest? If yes, please explain no
Information for City Roster and Internet
Name
Hovik Beduryan
Address
10208 Huntington Downs Avenue
Address Line 2
n/a
City
Bakersfield
State
CA
Zip
93312
Home Phone Number
(818) 800-3058
Work Phone Number E-Mail Address
[email protected]
Authorization and Release
Signature or Applicant
Hovik Beduryan
Signature Date
12/01/2025

1. Position 2 Ward 1

2. Position 16 Ward 7

3. 4.

Employment
Business Title or Occupation
N/A
Company
Address
Address Line 2
City County State Zip
Phone
Other Special Training or Experience
I have over 20 years experience in management in the Automotive industry and am very organized and detail oriented
E-Filed
11/21/2025
11:30:53
Filing ID:
12672
2/2
Previous and present governmental and civic experience. Indicate when, position and duties N/A
Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield I feel very invested in the progress and beautification of the city and I feel that I can lend my management experience to this committee.

Do you have any interests or associations which might present a conflict of interest? If yes, please explain No
Information for City Roster and Internet
Name
Jennifer Kurdi
Address
7404 DOS RIOS WAY
Address Line 2
na
City
Bakersfield
State
CA
Zip
93309
Home Phone Number
(562) 298-7731
Work Phone Number E-Mail Address
[email protected]
Authorization and Release
Signature or Applicant
Jenny A Kurdi
Signature Date
11/21/2025

1/2
Application for Appointment
Prefix
Mr.

First Name
Daniel
Middle Name
Casey
Last Name
Nolan
Residence Address
7713 Revelstoke way
Address Line 2
City
Bakersfield
County
Kern
State
CA
Zip
93309
Position(s) Sought (List in order of preference)

1. Keep Bakersfield Beautiful Committee

2. NOR Parks and Rec

3. 4.

Employment
Business Title or Occupation
Grounds Manager
Company
CSUB
Address
9001 Stockdale Highway
Address Line 2
City
Bakersfield
County
California
State
CA
Zip
93311
Phone
(661) 304-2397
Other Special Training or Experience
Certified Arborist
E-Filed
12/02/2025
11:43:49
Filing ID:
12705
2/2
Previous and present governmental and civic experience. Indicate when, position and duties I am currently the manager of grounds at CSUB. I am responsible for planting and replanting campus. I make determinations on what projects we take on.

Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield I have lived in Bakersfield all my life and want to make a difference in the community any way I can.

Do you have any interests or associations which might present a conflict of interest? If yes, please explain No
Information for City Roster and Internet
Name
Daniel Nolan
Address
7713 Revelstoke way
Address Line 2
9001 Stockdale Hwy
City
Bakersfield
State
CA
Zip
93309
Home Phone Number
(661) 304-2397
Work Phone Number
6613042397
E-Mail Address
[email protected]
Authorization and Release
Signature or Applicant
Daniel Casey Nolan
Signature Date
12/02/2025

1/2
Application for Appointment
Prefix First Name
Manuel
Middle Name
Anthony
Last Name
Ramirez
Residence Address
429 L Street Apt B
Address Line 2
City
Bakersfield
County
California
State
CA
Zip
93304
Position(s) Sought (List in order of preference)

1. Keep Bakersfield Beautiful Ward 1 Appointee

2. 3.

4. Employment
Business Title or Occupation
School Community Specialist
Company
Kern High School District
Address
1800 S. Fairfax Rd
Address Line 2
City
Bakersfield
County
California
State
CA
Zip
93307
Phone
(661) 366-1800
Other Special Training or Experience
Previous ward 1 alternate appointee
E-Filed
12/01/2025
15:25:02
Filing ID:
12695
2/2
Previous and present governmental and civic experience. Indicate when, position and duties Previous ward 1 alternate appointee
Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield Bakersfield is the place that I have called home since birth, It is a community that I have grown up appreciating. Growing up in Bakersfield I have always felt called to serve in any way possible. For the last 2 years I have had the honor of serving on KBBC as an alternate appointee and would love to continue my service as a Ward 1 appointee Do you have any interests or associations which might present a conflict of interest? If yes, please explain N/A
Information for City Roster and Internet
Name
Bakersfield
Address
429 L Street
Address Line 2
Apt B
City
Bakersfield
State
CA
Zip
93304
Home Phone Number
(661) 864-8560
Work Phone Number E-Mail Address
[email protected]
m
Authorization and Release
Signature or Applicant
Manuel Anthony Ramirez
Signature Date
12/01/2025

1/2
Application for Appointment
Prefix
Mrs.

First Name
Sandra
Middle Name Last Name
Turner
Residence Address
10024 BATTERSEA PARK DR
Address Line 2
10024 BATTERSEA PARK DR
City

BAKERSFIELD
County
CA
State
AR
Zip
93312-5629
Position(s) Sought (List in order of preference)

1. Keep Bakersfield Beautiful Committee Member

2. 3.

4. Employment
Business Title or Occupation
Hospice Social Worker
Company
Divinity Hospice
Address
2130 Chester Ave #102
Address Line 2
City
Bakersfield
County
Kern
State
CA
Zip
93301
Phone
(866) 987-5373
Other Special Training or Experience
Master of Social Work from CSUB
E-Filed
12/01/2025
18:03:51
Filing ID:
12696
2/2
Previous and present governmental and civic experience. Indicate when, position and duties Volunteer with Quilts for Kids since 2023. Leadership working with children and youth at church since 2000.

Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield I love Bakersfield and want to make it a better place for all residents! Do you have any interests or associations which might present a conflict of interest? If yes, please explain None
Information for City Roster and Internet
Name
Sandra Turner
Address
10024 BATTERSEA PARK DR
Address Line 2
#
City

BAKERSFIELD
State
CA
Zip
93312-5629
Home Phone Number
(661) 246-7527
Work Phone Number E-Mail Address
[email protected]
Authorization and Release
Signature or Applicant
Sandra Turner
Signature Date
12/01/2025

CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY:

SUBMIT TO: 25 JUN ZO CITY CLERK AH fO: S CITY OF BAK��IELD 1600 Truxtun Avenue BAK[f\3F/• L .,
1 • RESIDENT:
- .., L I l LL - /\ K ES NO
Bakersfield, CA 93301
{661} 326-37 67 Phone Nd.

WARD NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 {!)
(661) 323-3780 Fax No. ...

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD

APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT

APPLICANTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONTACT EACH COUNCILMEMBER TO COMMUNICATE THEIR INTEREST FOR APPOINTMENT.

V Mr. James Howard Wheeeler 1. Mrs. ______________________ _

2. l,........j Ms. First Middle
Residence address: 5119 Clear Crystal Drive
Bakersfield Kern CA.

City County State
Last
Phone (661 ) _549_-4_7_7_1 _______ _
93301
Zip

3. Position(s) sought: (List in order of preference)

4. 5.
1 l Keep Bakersfield Beautiful Committee Ward 7 Alternate 2 ) -------------------------
3) ------------------------
4)-------------------------
Business Title or Occupation: Non-Profit Executive Director Company: Flood Bakersfield Ministries, Inc
Address: 1830 Truxtun, Suite 210
Bakersfield Kern CA 93301
City County State
Phone ( 661 ) 323-5663 Ext. 1002
Education - List schools attended and/or graduated/degree(s):

CSUB - Master in Public Administration 2012
FPU - BA Organization Leadership 2007
Zip

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025 AGENDA CATEGORY: Appointments TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Julie Drimakis, City Clerk
DATE: December 4, 2025
SUBJECT: One appointment (at large) to the Kern Mosquito and Vector Control District due to a term expiration on December 31, 2025,
of Florn Core.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council determination.

BACKGROUND:

There is one appointment to the Kern Mosquito and Vector Control District (District) due to the term expiration of Florn Core on December 31, 2025. The appointment is for a two year term set to expire on December 31, 2025.

Applications for appointment have been received from :
 Florn Core, Incumbent
 Jenny Annet Kurdi
The primary objective of the District is the elimination of mosquito-breeding areas by way of educational services, various control measures, and abatement procedure methods when necessary. Members are nominated and appointed by the City Council of each respective participating City. Members appointed by the City Council shall be a Bakersfield resident and reside within the City throughout their two year term.

Applicants have been encouraged to contact each City Councilmember regarding their interest and qualifications. Meeting and held the second Wednesday of each month at 11:30 am at the District Office (4705 Allen Road.)
FISCAL IMPACT:

The action to appoint will have no fiscal impact on the City.

COUNCIL GOAL:

Community Character & Quality of Life
ATTACHMENTS:

Kern Mosquito Abatement and Vector Control Recruitment Packet 12-04-2025 Recruitment Packet for Kern Mosquito Abatement & Vector Control District
Kern Mosquito and Vector
The primary objective of the Kern Mosquito Abatement District is the elimination of mosquito-breeding areas by way of educational services, various control measures and abatement procedure methods when necessary. This member is nominated and appointed by the Council of each respective participating City.

For more information about the Kern Mosquito Abatement District Board, including current members, meeting agendas and schedules, please visit https:// www.kernmosquito.com/board-members

LEGAL AUTHORITY
Health & Safety Code Section 2240, et seq.

TERM
Two (2) year staggered term. Appointments are made in December.

QUALIFICATIONS
Eight (8) Trustees: four (4) appointed by the Kern County Board of Supervisors, one each by City Councils of Bakersfield, Arvin, Shafter, and Wasco. Each member appointed by governing board of the city shall be an elector of the city and a resident of that portion of the city which is within the Kern Mosquito Abatement District.

DUTIES
The primary objective shall be the progressive elimination of mosquito-breeding places, the objective to be accomplished by an educational service on control measures, performing services of temporary relief control, establishing projects of source reduction, using abatement procedure methods when necessary, and by general policy of cooperation.

MEETINGS
District Office, 4705 Allen Road, on the second Wednesday of each month, at 11:30 a.m.

REMUNERATION
$100.00 per month for travel and expenses.

STAFF
Kern Mosquito Abatement District
P.O. Box 9428
Bakersfield, CA 93309
(661) 589-2744

APPOINTEES MUST FILE AN ASSUMING OFFICE STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTEREST FORM 700. AN OATH OF OFFICE IS ALSO REQUIRED.

Number of Members:1 (min) - 1 (max)
Applicants Information
Core, Florn
Kurdi, Jenny Annet

TRUSTEES

LARRY CARROLL

FLORN CORE

LANCE ELLIOT

FATIMA ARELLANO -GONZALEZ

LARRY JENNINGS

DAVID POLM

STEVEN RUETTGERS

TIM UNRUH
CELEBRATING 100+ YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY

KERN

MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT

DISTRICT OFFICE
4705 ALLEN ROAD BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93314
PH: (661) 589-2744 FAX: (661) 589-4913 E MAIL: [email protected]

MANAGER

LA THAO

SUPERINTENDENT

JOHN KROLNIK

PUBLIC INFORMATION

OFFICER

TERRY KNIGHT

1917 2025
2022
November 13, 2025
Bakersfield Council Chamber
City Council of the City of Bakersfield
Attention: Julie Drimakis, CMC, CPMC, City Clerk
1600 Truxtun Avenue, 1st Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re: Recommendation for Reappointment of Mr. Florn Core to the Kern Mosquito and Vector Control District Board of Trustees.

City Council Members:

I am writing on behalf of the Kern Mosquito and Vector Control District (District) to respectfully recommend the reappointment of Florn Core to the District’s Board of Trustees. Mr. Core’s current term is set to expire on December 31, 2025, and we believe his continued service would greatly benefit the District and the community it serves.

During his tenure, Mr. Core has been a consistently active and engaged member of the Board and has held key leadership roles, including Board Secretary, Vice President, and Board President. He has demonstrated consistent commitment through regular attendance at regular Board, standing, and ad hoc committee meetings, and has played an important role in discussions on matters critical to the District’s mission of protecting public health through effective mosquito and vector control.

Continuity on the Board is essential for the District’s ongoing success. Mr. Core’s extensive knowledge of the native and non-native mosquito species, vector-borne diseases, and the District’s operations makes him an invaluable asset. His commitment and experience significantly enhance the District’s ability to fulfill its mission effectively.

For these reasons, I strongly recommend the reappointment of Mr. Florn Core to the Kern Mosquito and Vector Control District Board of Trustees.

Sincerely,
La Thao
General Manager
Kern Mosquito and Vector Control District
1/2
Application for Appointment
Prefix First Name
Jenny
Middle Name
Annet
Last Name
Kurdi
Residence Address
7404 DOS RIOS WAY
Address Line 2
City
Bakersfield
County
CA
State
CA
Zip
93309
Position(s) Sought (List in order of preference)

1. board member at large

2. 3.

4. Employment
Business Title or Occupation
N/A
Company
Address
Address Line 2
City County State Zip
Phone
Other Special Training or Experience
I have extensive management experience in the automotive industry.

E-Filed
11/21/2025
11:38:10
Filing ID:
12673
2/2
Previous and present governmental and civic experience. Indicate when, position and duties None
Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield I feel that I can lend my management experience and attention to detail to serve this committee. I am also a community member and have a vested interest in Kern County and the city of Bakersfield.

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025 AGENDA CATEGORY: Appointments TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Julie Drimakis, City Clerk
DATE: December 4, 2025
SUBJECT: One appointment to the North of the River Recreation and Parks District due to a term expiration on December 31, 2025
of Charles M. Howard.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends Council determination
BACKGROUND:

There will be one appointment to the Board of Directors of the North of the River (NOR) Recreation and Park District due to the term expiration of Charles Matthew Howard on December 31, 2025.

Applications have been received from the following:
 Hovik Beduryan
 Jeffrey C. Chudy
 Dennis P. Gallagher
 Charles M. Howard (incumbent)
 Jenny Annet Kurdi
 Daniel C. Nolan
 Michael Spickler
The NOR Recreation and Park District is a special district that plans, organizes, and conducts a wide variety of park and recreation programs within its designated boundaries. The district’s service area is 215 square miles in size, including 24 park sites totaling nearly 270 developed areas. The five-member board has the responsibility of providing the district with clearly defined goals and objectives in support of its mission; to provide and maintain an adequate program of creation activities and a system of areas and facilities designed to support them; and to establish rules and regulations governing internal organization and operation.

City representatives are nominated and appointed by the full Council and must be residents of the City and the District throughout the four-year term.

Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month at 5:30 p.m., at the District Office, 405 Galaxy Avenue.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The action to appoint someone has no fiscal impact to the City.

COUNCIL GOAL:

Innovative and Efficient City Government
ATTACHMENTS:

NOR Recreation and Parks District Recruitment Packet 12-04-2025 Recruitment Packet for North of the River Recreation & Parks District NOR Overview
The North of the River Recreation and Park District’s mission is to provide recreation and park services through planning, organizing and conducting a wide variety of recreation programs and community services for all ages; and to acquire, develop and maintain parks and natural and cultural resources within the district for the betterment, use and inspiration of the public we serve.

For more information about the NOR District Board, including current members, meeting agendas and schedules, please visit https://www.norfun.org/board-members.

LEGAL AUTHORITY
Public Resources Code 5780, et. seq.

TERM
Four (4) year term.

QUALIFICATIONS
Five (5) Board Members: Three appointed by the Kern County Board of Supervisors and two appointed by the City Council of Bakersfield. Members must be registered voters and reside within the District.

DUTIES
To provide the District with clearly defined goals and objectives in support of its mission; to provide and maintain an adequate program of recreation activities and a system of areas and facilities designed to support them; to establish rules and regulations governing internal organization and operation.

MEETINGS
District Office, 405 Galaxy Avenue, on the third Monday of each month at 5:30 p.m. If the third Monday falls on a legal state holiday, the meeting will be held on the Tuesday following the holiday.

REMUNERATION
None.

STAFF
North of the River Recreation and Park District
405 Galaxy Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93308
(661) 392-2000
Number of Members:2 (min) - 2 (max)
Term Length:4 Year(s)
Type:Permanent
Applicants Information
Beduryan, Hovik
chudy, jeffrey c
Gallagher, Dennis P
Howard, Charles M
Kurdi, Jenny Annet
Nolan, Daniel C
Spickler, Michael
1/3
Application for Appointment
Prefix
Mr.

First Name
Hovik
Middle Name Last Name
Beduryan
Residence Address
10208 Huntington Downs Avenue
Address Line 2
City
Bakersfield
County
CA
State
CA
Zip
93312
Position(s) Sought (List in order of preference)

1. any vacancy

2. 3.

4. Employment
Business Title or Occupation
gas service representative
Company
pg&e
Address
Address Line 2
City County State Zip
Phone
Other Special Training or Experience
E-Filed
12/01/2025
18:26:49
Filing ID:
12698
2/3
I have extensive experience in labor representation, community organizing, and leadership development through my work in multiple unions. As a Shop Steward with UWUA Local 132, I’ve received training in contract enforcement, workplace safety, conflict resolution, and effective communication. My role as Young Workers Committee Chair has given me additional experience in event coordination, public speaking, volunteer management, and youth leadership development. As an Organizing Steward with IBEW Local 1245, I gained hands-on experience in campaign organizing, outreach strategy, and coalition building. I have also participated in civic engagement efforts, including supporting local elections, community programs, and charitable initiatives throughout Bakersfield. These combined experiences have strengthened my ability to collaborate, problem-solve, and advocate for the public—skills that translate directly to serving on a city board or commission.

Do you have any interests or associations which might present a conflict of interest? If yes, please explain no
Information for City Roster and Internet
Name
hovik Beduryan
Address
10208 Huntington Downs Avenue
Address Line 2
n/a
City
Bakersfield
State
CA
Zip
93312
Home Phone Number
(818) 800-3058
Work Phone Number E-Mail Address
[email protected]
Authorization and Release
Signature or Applicant
hovik beduryan
Signature Date
12/01/2025

1/2
Application for Appointment
Prefix
Mr.

First Name
jeffrey
Middle Name
c
Last Name
chudy
Residence Address
8903 cashmere court
Address Line 2
City
bakersfield
County
CA
State
CA
Zip
93312
Position(s) Sought (List in order of preference)

1. NOR Board

2. 3.

4. Employment
Business Title or Occupation
professor
Company
bakersfield college
Address
1801 panoorama drive
Address Line 2
City
bakersfield
County
kern
State
CA
Zip
93305
Phone
(661) 395-4266
Other Special Training or Experience
E-Filed
11/26/2025
08:20:12
Filing ID:
12686
2/2
Retired Head Football Coach - Bakersfield College- 16 yrs - assistant fb coach, Bakersfield College 12 yrs
Previous and present governmental and civic experience. Indicate when, position and duties no experience
Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield I believe NOR Parks and Recreation is a vital resource for our constituent's. With my background , I believe I can give great insight that will improve services NOR currently provides
Do you have any interests or associations which might present a conflict of interest? If yes, please explain none
Information for City Roster and Internet
Name
Jeffrey Chuhdy
Address
8903
Address Line 2
cashmere court
City
bakersfield
State
CA
Zip
93312
Home Phone Number
(661) 588-1215
Work Phone Number
6618092317
E-Mail Address
[email protected]
Authorization and Release
Signature or Applicant
Jeffrey C Chudy
Signature Date
11/26/2025

1/4
Application for Appointment
Prefix First Name
Dennis
Middle Name
P
Last Name
Gallagher, II
Residence Address
14444 AUSTIN CREEK AVE
Address Line 2
City

BAKERSFIELD
County
CA
State
CA
Zip
93314
Position(s) Sought (List in order of preference)

1. Councilmember (Board member)

2. 3.

4. Employment
Business Title or Occupation
Special Counsel
Company
Fisher & Phillips LLP
Address
621 Capitol Mall, Suite 2400
Address Line 2
City
Sacramento
County State
CA
Zip
95814
Phone
(916) 210-0392
Other Special Training or Experience
E-Filed
12/03/2025
12:52:39
Filing ID:
12715
2/4
Adjunct Professor and Faculty Member, Kern County College of Law; Former President and Board Member, Bakersfield Active 2030 Club; Chairman, Christmas Experience presented by the Child Guidance Clinic and Active 2030 Club; Volunteer youth football and soccer coach.

Previous and present governmental and civic experience. Indicate when, position and duties Outside counsel for multiple public entities from 2011 through present - represent entities in active and prospective litigation matters as well as provide employment counseling and advice.

Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield 3/4
I am seeking the opportunity to serve because I believe in the values of community engagement, volunteerism, and civic duty as well as what those can bring to a community. As a long-time attorney, I have spent my career analyzing complex issues, balancing competing interests, and helping organizations operate with transparency, accountability, and sound governance. Those are skills I am excited to bring to a role that directly strengthens the City of Bakersfield.

Bakersfield’s parks, recreation programs, and community facilities play a vital role in supporting healthy families, fostering community connections, and building a vibrant city for future generations. As a parent of two young children who are active in athletics and recreation, I see firsthand how important these programs and spaces are—not only in supporting physical well-being, but in giving children safe environments to learn teamwork, confidence, and resilience. This personal connection motivates me to ensure that all Bakersfield families have access to diverse, inclusive, and well-run recreational opportunities.

My prior board service and volunteer involvement coupled with my profession and prior representation of public entities have shown me how effective governance can elevate an organization’s impact. I understand the responsibilities that come with serving on a board, including stewardship of resources, adherence to public meeting laws, and working collaboratively with staff and community members. I am particularly interested in contributing to strategic planning, long-term capital improvements, and community engagement efforts.

In addition to my legal training, I bring experience in organizational oversight, risk management, and community advocacy—all of which align with the needs of a strong Parks and Recreation board member. I am also committed to listening to diverse perspectives, supporting data-informed decision-making, and approaching challenges with both practicality and creativity.

Ultimately, I wish to serve because I care deeply about Bakersfield’s future, and I believe that thriving parks and recreation programs are foundational to a thriving community.

Contributing my skills, experience, and passion to this work would be both a privilege and a meaningful way to give back to the city my family calls home.

Do you have any interests or associations which might present a conflict of interest? If yes, please explain No, not that I am aware of.

Information for City Roster and Internet
Name
Dennis P. Gallagher, II
Address
14444 Austin Creek Ave.

Address Line 2
N/A
4/4
City
Bakersfield
State
CA
Zip
93314
Home Phone Number
(661) 304-4737
Work Phone Number E-Mail Address
[email protected]
m
Authorization and Release
Signature or Applicant
Dennis P. Gallagher, II
Signature Date
12/03/2025

1/4
Application for Appointment
Prefix
Mr.

First Name
Charles
Middle Name
M
Last Name
Howard
Residence Address
15515 Santa Clara Court
Address Line 2
City
Bak
County
USA
State
CA
Zip
93314
Position(s) Sought (List in order of preference)

1. North of the River Recreation & Parks District

2. 3.

4. Employment
Business Title or Occupation
Operations Manager
Company
Jones Lang Lasalle
Address
200 E Randolph St
Address Line 2
City
Chicago
County
USA
State
IL
Zip
60601
Phone
(312) 782-5800
Other Special Training or Experience
E-Filed
11/30/2025
15:04:20
Filing ID:
12692
2/4
Current Co-Chair - North of the River Recreation & Parks District; current member of the California Parks and Recreation Society (CPRS) - District 15; former CPRS District 15 President; former General Services Manager - Park Operations and Facility Maintenance with the County of Kern.

Previous and present governmental and civic experience. Indicate when, position and duties Previous - General Services Manager - Park Operations and Facility Maintenance with the County of Kern - Duties: Plan, organize, coordinate and direct all staff and activities of Facilities Maintenance and Parks Operations
• Administer the corresponding budgets and financial reporting for Facilities Maintenance and Park Operations
• Make recommendations regarding department policies and procedures • Confer with officials, employees, vendors, clients, and the public relative to the activities regarding Facilities Maintenance and Park Operations
• Manage and initiate successful programs and ensure regulatory and safety compliance for Facilities Maintenance and Park Operations
• Facilitate work order management for the maintenance team and vendors • Support Construction Services in the implementation and execution of short and longterm Capital Improvement projects • Interview, select, train, evaluate, and discipline subordinate staff • Develop and evaluate meaningful performance measures and goals for Facilities Maintenance and Park Operations
• Oversee and execute the appropriate visual on-site inspections of county-owned and maintained facilities and parks
• Manage the preventative program for the County and initiate maintenance work orders and requisitions to accomplish non-routine repairs
• Prepare periodic reports on staff, workload performance and best practices • Represent the County at meetings and conferences and in matters concerning Facilities Maintenance and Park Operations
• Prepare oral and written reports and make presentations for the Department Head, County Administrative Office Executive Leadership Team, Parks and Recreation Commission, Board of Supervisors, and other special interest groups as assigned • Formulate and implement strategies for providing responsive customer service to County departments and user agencies
• Investigate and respond to complaints regarding Facilities Maintenance and Park Operations
• Participate in evaluation committees for goods and services

Present: Co-Chair - North of the River Recreation & Parks District - Duties: To provide the District with clearly defined goals and objectives in support of its mission; to provide and maintain an adequate program of recreation activities and a system of areas and facilities designed to support them; to establish rules and regulations governing internal organization and operation.
3/4
Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield I wish to continue to serve on the North of the River Recreation and Parks District (NOR) Board of Directors because I am committed to strengthening the quality of life for residents in the City of Bakersfield. Recreation and parks are essential to building healthy, connected, and vibrant communities, and I believe the NOR District plays a crucial role in delivering those opportunities to families, youth, and adults across our region.

I am motivated to contribute my time and experience toward ensuring that our parks, community centers, and recreational programs continue to grow, remain accessible, and reflect the needs of the diverse communities they serve. As Bakersfield expands, thoughtful planning and stewardship of our recreational resources are more important than ever. I want to help guide that growth in a way that prioritizes safety, inclusivity, sustainability, and long-term community benefit.

Serving on the Board would give me the opportunity to collaborate with local leaders, listen to community voices, and help shape policies and programs that positively impact physical wellness, youth development, neighborhood engagement, and environmental preservation. I am eager to contribute constructive ideas, support responsible budgeting, and advocate for amenities and programs that families rely on every day.

Ultimately, I want to serve because I care deeply about this community and believe that strong parks and recreation systems are foundational to a thriving Bakersfield. I welcome the chance to help advance that mission as part of the NOR Recreation and Parks District Board of Directors.

Do you have any interests or associations which might present a conflict of interest? If yes, please explain N/A
Information for City Roster and Internet
Name
Charles Howard
Address
15515 Santa Clara Court
Address Line 2
N/A
City
Bakersfield
State
CA
Zip
93314
Home Phone Number
(661) 432-5198
Work Phone Number E-Mail Address
[email protected]
4/4
Authorization and Release
Signature or Applicant
Charles M Howard
Signature Date
11/30/2025

1. board member

2. 3.

4. Employment
Business Title or Occupation Company
Address
Address Line 2
City County State Zip
Phone
Other Special Training or Experience
I have extensive experience working as a automotive dealership Service Manager. I worked in the automotive industry for 20 years
E-Filed
11/21/2025
11:15:30
Filing ID:
12671
2/2
Previous and present governmental and civic experience. Indicate when, position and duties No
Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield I wish to become more involved in my city's planning boards. I feel very invested in the growth and advancement of the city.

1/2
Application for Appointment
Prefix First Name
Daniel
Middle Name
Casey
Last Name
Nolan
Residence Address
7713 Revelstoke way
Address Line 2
City
Bakersfield
County
California
State
CA
Zip
93309
Position(s) Sought (List in order of preference)

1. NOR Parks and Rec

2. 3.

4. Employment
Business Title or Occupation
Manager
Company
CSUB
Address
9001 Stockdale Highway
Address Line 2
City
Bakersfield
County
California
State
CA
Zip
93311
Phone
(661) 304-2397
Other Special Training or Experience
Certified Arborist
E-Filed
12/02/2025
11:48:20
Filing ID:
12706
2/2
Previous and present governmental and civic experience. Indicate when, position and duties I am currently manager of grounds at CSUB. I also worked for Kern County Parks for 8 years.

Please explain why you wish to serve on a Board/Commission for the City of Bakersfield I would like to be a part of improving the parks. I believe the parks are a great public asset and should be well taken care of.

Do you have any interests or associations which might present a conflict of interest? If yes, please explain No
Information for City Roster and Internet
Name
Daniel Casey Nolan
Address
7713 Revelstoke way
Address Line 2
9001 Stockdale Hwy
City
Bakersfield
State
CA
Zip
93309
Home Phone Number
(661) 304-2397
Work Phone Number E-Mail Address
[email protected]
Authorization and Release
Signature or Applicant
Daniel Casey Nolan
Signature Date
12/02/2025

BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL

MINUTES
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 2025
Council Chambers, City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue
Regular Meeting–5:15 p.m.

1. ROLL CALL

Present: Mayor Goh, Vice Mayor Kaur, Councilmembers Arias, Gonzales, Smith, Koman and Bashirtash

Absent: Councilmember Weir

2. INVOCATION
by Fr. Daniel Sous, St. Demiana Coptic Orthodox Church.

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
by Seth Hewett, City Fellow, Fire Department.

4. PRESENTATIONS
None.

5. PUBLIC STATEMENTS

5.a. Non-Agenda Item Public Statements

1. Troy Hightower spoke regarding the Municipal Airport.

Councilmember Arias requested staff meet with Mr. Hightower to discuss his recommendations.

2. Freddy Miranda spoke regarding advocating for a Fatih & Wellness Partnership Initiative.

3. Keith Wesley, Doctor of Divinity, made comments.

4. Tanbeer Brar spoke regarding made comments.

5.b. Agenda Item Public Statements
Kathy Kozlowski spoke regarding item 7.e.10.

6. APPOINTMENTS
None.

7. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Minutes:

7.a.1. Approval of minutes of November 5, 2025, Regular City Council Meetings. (Staff recommends approval of the minutes.)
Bakersfield, California, November 19, 2025 - Page 2

7. CONSENT CALENDAR continued
b. Payments:

7.b.1. Receive and file department payments from October 24, 2025, to November 6, 2025, totaling $23,560,331.03 as follows: department payments in the amount of $21,975,965.16, and Self Insurance payments in the amount of $1,584,365.87. (Staff recommends receive and file report.)

7.b.2. Receive and file department agreements over $40,000 and under $100,000 executed between October 24, 2025, to November 6, 2025. (Staff recommends receive and file report.)
c. Ordinances:

7.c.1. First reading of an ordinance amending Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 1.12.020 by adding Annexation No. 713, South H No. 4, located at the northwest corner of South H Street and Cecil Brunner Drive. (Ward 2)

FR ONLY

7.c.2. Adoption of the following ordinances amending various sections of the Bakersfield Municipal Code: (FR 11/5/25)
(Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance amendments.)

1. Amending Section 3.20.105 relating to Purchasing and Contract Procedure.

ORD 5203

2. Amending Sections 15.66.020, 15.66.060 and 15.66.080 relating to Drilling for and Production of Petroleum.

REMOVED BY STAFF

3. Amending Chapters 15.04, 15.05, 15.07, 15.09, 15.11, 15.13, 15.15, 15.17,

15.19, 15.30, and Chapter 15.31 relating to the 2025 versions of the California Building and Construction Codes.

ORD 5204

7.c.3. Adoption of the following ordinances amending various sections of the Bakersfield Municipal Code: (FR 11/5/25)
(Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance amendments.)

1. Amending Section 17.10.20 relating to Residential Zones.

ORD 5205

2. Amending Section 17.12.020 relating to Mixed Use Zones.

ORD 5206

3. Amending Sections 17.65.010 and 17.65.030 relating to Accessory Dwelling Unit and Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit.

ORD 5207
Bakersfield, California, November 19, 2025 - Page 3

7. CONSENT CALENDAR continued
d. Resolutions:

7.d.1. Resolution determining that Cellebrite Inseyets subscription renewal can most efficiently be obtained through cooperative procurement bidding procedures from Carahsoft Technology Corporation and authorizing the Finance Director to dispense with bidding for the purchase of Cellebrite Inseyets subscription renewal in the amount of $134,892.39 for the Police Department.
(Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.)
RES 135-2025

7.d.2. Resolution to dispense with bidding and Agreement (not to exceed $500,000) with HP, Inc for Managed Print Services:
(Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.)

1. Resolution to dispense with bidding for purchase of HP, Inc., Managed Print Services
RES 136-2025

2. Agreement with HP, Inc. (not to exceed $500,000) for managed print services.

AGR 2025-210

7.e. Agreements:

7.e.1. Agreement with Kern County Forensic Services, LLC. (not to exceed $250,000), to continue forensic evidence collection and examination services. (Ward 4) (Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2025-211

7.e.2. Agreement with the Panama-Buena-Vista School District (compensation to the City not to exceed $250,000 and termination date of June 10, 2026) to provide School Resource Officer Services. (Ward 4)
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2025-212

7.e.3. Agreement with Rosedale, Norris and Fruitvale School Districts (compensation to the City not to exceed $143,000 and termination date of July 31, 2026) to provide School Resource Officer Services. (Ward 4)
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2025-213

7.e.4. Agreement with Sierra Snow Surveys (not to exceed $861,300) to conduct snow survey measurements.
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2025-214

7.e.5. Agreement with TK Elevator Corporation fka Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation (not to exceed $450,000) to provide on-call services for inspection, repair and maintenance. (Ward 2)
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2025-215
Bakersfield, California, November 19, 2025 - Page 4

7. CONSENT CALENDAR continued

7.e.6. Final Map and Improvement Agreement with Encanto Gardens IV for Tract 7408 Phase 2 Developer is requesting to enter into an agreement so the final map located northeast corner of South Allen Road and Pensinger Road can be approved and recorded. (Ward 2)
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2025-216, DEEDS 9846, 9847, 9848, 9849, 9850, 9851

7.e.7. Final Map, Improvement Agreement, and Landscape Agreement with Summit Capital Ventures, Inc for Tract 7468 Phase 1 Developer is requesting to enter into an agreement so the final map located on the Southwest corner of South Wegis Avenue and Stockdale Ranch Drive can be approved and recorded. (Ward 5) (Staff recommends approval of the amendment.)
AGR 2025-217, AGR 2025-218, DEEDS 9852, 9853, 9854, 9855, 9856, 9857

7.e.8. Transportation Impact Fee credit agreement with BN Bakersfield 1, LP (not to exceed $133,870.92) for the construction of Olive Drive to full ½ width on the westbound lane from the Tract 7093 Phase 2/3 boundary to the eastern tract boundary. (Ward 4) (Staff recommends approval of the amendment.)
AGR 2025-219

7.e.9. Construction Management Agreement with NV5 (not to exceed $636,644.52) to provide construction management services for the Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 3 Digester Gas Booster Blower Replacement Project.
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2025-220

7.e.10. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for General Plan Amendment and concurrent Zone Change No 24-0377
(Staff recommends approval of the agreements and the appropriation of funds.)

1. Agreement with Tortuga Bay Waterpark, LLC. ($223,637) for the preparation of an EIR.

2. Agreement with Kimley-Horn, Inc. ($183,637) to assist the City in preparing the EIR.

3. Appropriate $223,637. (Tortuga Bay Waterpark, LLC) to the Development Services Operating budget in the General Fund. (Tortuga Bay Waterpark) (Ward 4)
REMOVED FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. See pages 6 & 7.

7.e.11. Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 2023-157 with Clifford and Brown ($750,000; revised not to exceed $1,100,000) to provide outside legal services in the matter of Edgar Quincy Sloan v. City of Bakersfield.
(Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the agreement.) AGR 2023-157 (3)
Bakersfield, California, November 19, 2025 - Page 5

7. CONSENT CALENDAR continued

7.e.12. Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2023-294 with The Open Door Network (increase compensation $305,760; revised not to exceed $911,520 and extend term to December 13, 2026), to continue recycling and sorting materials at the Mt. Vernon Organics Recycling & Composting Facility.
(Staff recommends approval of the amendment.)
AGR 2023-294 (2)

7.e.13. Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 2024-308 with Community Action Partnership of Kern (extend term to September 30, 2026) for HOME-ARP Supportive Services - Coordinated Entry System.
(Staff recommends approval of the amendment.)
AGR 2024-308 (1)

7.e.14. Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 2022-276 with ENNIS-FLINT INC. (increase compensation by $30,000; revised not to exceed $670,546.25 and extend the term by one year), to continue the supply of traffic paint.
(Staff recommends approval of the amendment.)
AGR 2022-276 (3)

7.e.15. Amendment No. 1 to Design Consultant Agreement No. 2024-180 with Ardurra Group, Inc. (increase Compensation; not to exceed $174,526 and extend term, extend time for completion), for design engineering services for Stormwater Lift Station Rehabilitation: Chester Avenue at BNSF Rail Crossing. (Ward 2) (Staff recommends approval of the amendment.)
AGR 2024-180 (1)

7.e.16. Amendment No.1 to Agreement No. 2025-164 with Willdan Energy Solutions (not to exceed $344,240) to allow for the procurement of a battery for our solar project.
(Staff recommends approval of the amendment.)
AGR 2025-164 (1)

7.e.17. Contract Change Order Nos. 10, 22, and 31 to Agreement No. 2024-235 (7th Movement) with Granite Construction Company (increasing compensation by $78,023.58; revised not to exceed $27,710,104.93) for the Centennial Corridor EB58 to NB99 Loop Connector Project. (Wards 1 & 2)
(Staff recommend approval of the change orders.)
AGR 2024-235 CCO 10, 22, 31

7.f. Bids:

7.f.1. Reject bids for Cellebrite Inseyets® Annual Subscription Renewal for the Police Department.
(Staff recommend rejection of bids.)

7.f.2. Accept bid and approve contract with GHC Pipeline LLC ($1,805,200.50) for sewer improvements on Eye Street from Wall Street to 23rd Street. (Ward 2) (Staff recommends acceptance of low bid, approval of contract, and approval of Citycontrolled contingency.) AGR 2025-223
Bakersfield, California, November 19, 2025 - Page 6

7. CONSENT CALENDAR continued

7.f.3. Accept Bid and Approve Contract with Best Weigh Scale Company, Inc. ($166,697.55) for installation of a second facility truck scale at Mount Vernon Organics Recycling & Composting Facility. (Ward 1)
(Staff recommends acceptance of bid, approval of agreement.) AGR 2025-224

7.f.4. PFAS Treatment Program - Phase 1
(Staff recommends acceptance of proposal, approval of agreement and appropriation.)

1. Accept proposal and approve agreement with Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group (not to exceed $726,301) to provide engineering services for six well sites: CBK-8, CBK-9, CBK-26, CBK-31, CBK 33, CBK-43.

AGR 2025-225

2. Appropriate $800,000 of Litigation Revenue to Domestic Water Fund Capital Improvement budget.

7.g. Miscellaneous:

7.g.1. Appropriate and transfer $350,000 from the Water Availability Fees Fund to the Domestic Water Fund for the purchase of land for water well site CBK-84 within Old River Ranch Tract 6577.
(Staff recommends approval of the appropriation and transfer.)

7.g.2. Appropriate $8,801 to the Public Works Department’s Operating Budget within the Equipment Management Fund to complete the purchase of portable generator for the Water Department (unbudgeted).
(Staff recommends approval of appropriation.)

7.g.3. Appropriate $7,140 to the Public Works Department’s Operating budget within the Equipment Management Fund to complete the purchase of a pressure washer for the General Services Division (unbudgeted).
(Staff recommend approval of the appropriation.)

7.h. Successor Agency Business:

None.

7.i. Public Safety/Vital Services Measure:

None.

City Clerk Drimakis announced staff memorandums were received regarding item 7.c.2.2., requesting the item be removed from the agenda and item 7.f.3. correcting the not to exceed amount to $183,367.30.

Motion by Vice Mayor Kaur to adopt Consent Calendar items 7.a. through 7.i. with the removal of item 7.c.2.2. and Councilmember Koman requesting item 7.e.10. be removed for separate consideration.

Motion approved with Councilmember Weir absent.

7.e.10. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for General Plan Amendment and concurrent Zone Change No 24-0377
(Staff recommends approval of the agreements and the appropriation of funds.)

1. Agreement with Tortuga Bay Waterpark, LLC. ($223,637) for the preparation of an EIR.

AGR 2025-221
Bakersfield, California, November 19, 2025 - Page 7

7. CONSENT CALENDAR continued
item 7.e.10. continued

2. Agreement with Kimley-Horn, Inc. ($183,637) to assist the City in preparing the EIR.

AGR 2025-222

3. Appropriate $223,637. (Tortuga Bay Waterpark, LLC) to the Development Services Operating budget in the General Fund. (Tortuga Bay Waterpark) (Ward 4)
Motion by Councilmember Koman to adopt Consent Calendar item 7.e.10 Motion approved with Councilmember Weir absent.

8. CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC HEARINGS

8.a. Public Hearing to consider a resolution to Vacate the Street Right of Way located in front of 7410 Niles Street. (Ward 3)
(Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.)
RES 137-2025

8.b. Public Appeal Hearing of Planning Commission’s Approval of Zone Change No. 25- 0001 and adoption of its proposed mitigated negative declaration. McIntosh & Associates, representing Camino Media Properties, LLC, is proposing a Zone Change on approximately 11.22 acres generally located at 9700 Camino Media. (Staff recommendation to refer item back to staff.)

1. Resolution adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

2. First Reading of an ordinance amending Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code by changing the official zoning classification from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-4 (High Density MultiUnit Dwelling) zone. (Ward 5) Consent Calendar Public Hearings items 8.a. and 8.b. opened at 5:45 p.m.

No one spoke in opposition or in favor of staff’s recommendations.

Consent Calendar Public Hearings items 8.a. and 8.b. closed at 5:45 p.m.

Motion by Vice Mayor Kaur to adopt Consent Calendar Public Hearings items 8.a. and

8.b. Motion approved with Councilmember Weir absent.

9. HEARINGS

9.a. Public appeal hearing to consider Planning Commission’s approval of General Plan Amendment No. 21-0424 Williamson Act Cancellation No. 25-0001, Exclusion from Agricultural Preserve No. 10, and its proposed mitigated negative declaration. Next Gen Engineering Group Inc., representing ORR Development 2, LLC, is proposing a General Plan Amendment, Williamson Act Cancellation No. 25-0001, and Exclusion from Agricultural Preserve No. 10 on approximately 28.91 acres generally located on the north side of McCutchen Road at Mountain Vista Road. (Staff recommends denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission’s recommendation.)
Bakersfield, California, November 19, 2025 - Page 8

9. HEARINGS continued
item 9.a. continued
The request includes:

1. Resolution adopting a General Plan Amendment to change land use designation from R-IA (Resource – Intensive Agriculture) to LMR (LowMedium Residential)

2. Resolution adopting the tentative Cancellation of a Williamson Act Land Use Contract and Exclusion of 28.91 acres from the boundaries of an Agricultural Preserve.

3. Resolution adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Lozeau Drury LLP, on behalf of Supporters Alliance For Environmental Responsibility (“SAFER”), submitted the appeal to the Planning Commission's approval of the request.

City Clerk Drimakis announced a staff memorandum was provided requesting the item be referred back to staff.

Hearing item 9.a. opened at 5:48 p.m.

No one spoke in opposition or in favor of staff’s recommendations.

Hearing item 9.a. closed at 5:49 p.m.

Motion by Councilmember Koman to refer Hearings item 9.a. back to staff and re-notice to a later date. Motion approved with Councilmember Weir absent.

10. REPORTS
None.

11. DEFERRED BUSINESS
None.

12. NEW BUSINESS
None.

13. COUNCIL AND MAYOR STATEMENTS
Councilmember Gonzales expressed appreciation to Fire, Police and Public Works staff on the wet weekend.

Councilmember Gonzales requested staff prepare a report on calls-for-service received related to flooding in the urban core and citywide and provide it to the City Council on a periodic basis so that it may be utilized for the planning of storm drainage upgrades in the future.

Councilmember Gonzales requested staff review the city's sign ordinance policy as it applies to Highway 58, east of Highway 99 and present the city council with a revision that resembles the County's sign ordinance policy for the same area.

Bakersfield, California, November 19, 2025 - Page 9

13. COUNCIL AND MAYOR STATEMENTS continued
Councilmember Gonzales requested an update on the Vacant Property Ordinance, activities including any iterations to address chronic vacant properties that continue to be a hazard for the community be presented to the entire City Council at a future meeting.

Councilmember Smith spoke regarding a letter received from Sierra Club regarding trimming and planting of trees and provided an update regarding the Jail bed taskforce.

14. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Goh adjourned the meeting at 5:55 p.m.

______________________________

KAREN GOH
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
ATTEST:
___________________________________

JULIE DRIMAKIS, MMC
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of
the Council of the City of Bakersfield
Bakersfield, California, November 19, 2025 - Page 10
***THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK***

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent – Payments and Agreements TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Randy McKeegan, Finance Director
DATE: December 5, 2025
SUBJECT: Receive and file payments from November 7, 2025, to December 4, 2025, totaling $44,624,262.18.
as follows: department payments in the amount of $42,862,999.69, and Self Insurance payments in the amount of $1,761,262.49.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends receiving and filing the report.

BACKGROUND:

In accordance with Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 2.08.020 the Finance Director must report the City's disbursements periodically to the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT:
$44,624,262.18
COUNCIL GOAL:

Innovative and Efficient City Government
ATTACHMENTS:
1-AP Check Register 12.17.25
Oracle AP Check Register 12.17.25
12/5/2025 CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 1
Check Number Vendor Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 775291 10204 ASSOCIATION BKFD POLICE OFFICER FCU Nov 7, 2025 $24,554.32 775292 10200 BAKERSFIELD CITY FIREFIGHTERS Nov 7, 2025 $8,008.67 775293 10211 BAKERSFIELD FIREMEN Nov 7, 2025 $14,774.68 775294 10203 BAKERSFIELD POLICE BENEFIT Nov 7, 2025 $36,756.42 775295 10205 MUTUAL BENEFIT ASSOCIATION Nov 7, 2025 $2,555.96 775296 26810 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE CO Nov 7, 2025 $3,972.23 775297 22324 SEIU LOCAL 521 Nov 7, 2025 $23,821.25
775298 33184 EYEMED Nov 13, 2025 $5,794.36
775299 26810 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE CO Nov 13, 2025 $5,009.63 775300 30027 U S BANK - PARS #6746022400 Nov 13, 2025 $4,064.36 775301 30029 UNITED CONCORDIA DENTAL PLANS OF CA Nov 13, 2025 $68,626.20 775302 30020 UNUM Nov 13, 2025 $6,829.83
775303 10204 ASSOCIATION BKFD POLICE OFFICER FCU Nov 21, 2025 $24,500.30 775304 10200 BAKERSFIELD CITY FIREFIGHTERS Nov 21, 2025 $8,014.35 775305 10211 BAKERSFIELD FIREMEN Nov 21, 2025 $14,774.68 775306 10203 BAKERSFIELD POLICE BENEFIT Nov 21, 2025 $36,704.23 775307 10205 MUTUAL BENEFIT ASSOCIATION Nov 21, 2025 $2,570.96 775308 26810 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE CO Nov 21, 2025 $3,981.46 775309 22324 SEIU LOCAL 521 Nov 21, 2025 $23,601.35
775310 33184 EYEMED Nov 26, 2025 $5,792.94
775311 10047 MISC RECEIVABLE REFUND VENDOR Nov 26, 2025 $669.82 775312 10047 MISC RECEIVABLE REFUND VENDOR Nov 26, 2025 $564.08 775313 10047 MISC RECEIVABLE REFUND VENDOR Nov 26, 2025 $188.80 775314 26810 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE CO Nov 26, 2025 $5,012.33 775315 10047 MISC RECEIVABLE REFUND VENDOR Nov 26, 2025 $831.34 775316 10047 MISC RECEIVABLE REFUND VENDOR Nov 26, 2025 $539.52 775317 30027 U S BANK - PARS #6746022400 Nov 26, 2025 $3,495.88 775318 30029 UNITED CONCORDIA DENTAL PLANS OF CA Nov 26, 2025 $68,680.99 775319 30020 UNUM Nov 26, 2025 $6,852.01
9997717 10199 BAKERSFIELD CITY EMPLOYEE Nov 7, 2025 $213,715.00 9997718 30014 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT Nov 7, 2025 $341,952.75 9997719 10217 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-303749 Nov 7, 2025 $66,586.40 9997720 30010 IRS Nov 7, 2025 $937,583.66
9997721 16863 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS Nov 7, 2025 $168,852.18 9997722 20699 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS C/O Nov 7, 2025 $66,577.66 9997723 30028 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA-P Nov 13, 2025 $715,579.12 9997724 30021 KAISER PERMANENTE Nov 13, 2025 $339,140.09 9997725 10206 STATE OF CALIF - PERS Nov 13, 2025 $1,637,449.23 9997726 30022 IRS / FDRF Nov 20, 2025 $101.00
9997727 30025 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Nov 20, 2025 $18,452.19 9997728 10199 BAKERSFIELD CITY EMPLOYEE Nov 21, 2025 $212,259.00 9997729 30014 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT Nov 21, 2025 $351,511.32 9997730 10217 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-303749 Nov 21, 2025 $65,962.60 9997731 30010 IRS Nov 21, 2025 $938,979.51
9997732 16863 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS Nov 21, 2025 $166,891.99 9997733 20699 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS C/O Nov 21, 2025 $65,849.51 9997734 30028 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA-P Nov 26, 2025 $714,808.99 9997735 30021 KAISER PERMANENTE Nov 26, 2025 $339,463.81 9997736 10206 STATE OF CALIF - PERS Nov 26, 2025 $1,624,977.64 9997737 30025 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Dec 4, 2025 $18,721.59 50 Overall - Count
Overall - Total $9,416,958.19
$9,416,958.19
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\12.17.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 1
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
807660 0110 A T & T MOBILITY 11/13/2025 $ 44.90
807661 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/13/2025 $ 42,781.66 807665 4120 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/13/2025 $ 66,213.30 807666 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/13/2025 $ 26,565.88 807667 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/13/2025 $ 21,724.04 807668 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/13/2025 $ 119,497.24 807669 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/13/2025 $ 288.00 807670 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/13/2025 $ 27,205.08 807673 0110 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 11/13/2025 $ 21,424.84
807674 0110 CLARITI CLOUD INC 11/13/2025 $ 20,000.00
807677 0110 EAST NILES COMMUNITY SERVICES 11/13/2025 $ 2,188.04 807678 4120 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 11/13/2025 $ 58,686.67 807681 0110 GREENFIELD COUNTY WATER DIST 11/13/2025 $ 4,146.81 807683 0140 Maricruz Blowers 11/13/2025 $ 148.00
807684 0110 OILDALE MUTUAL WATER COMPANY 11/13/2025 $ 54.70 807685 4410 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 11/13/2025 $ 56,971.97 807686 0110 PRIMO BRANDS 11/13/2025 $ 107.72
807687 4310 SOCALGAS 11/13/2025 $ 37.74
807688 0110 SOCALGAS 11/13/2025 $ 632.90
807689 5110 T-MOBILE 11/13/2025 $ 369.81
807690 0110 VAUGHN WATER CO., INC. 11/13/2025 $ 14,168.91 807693 5110 ADVANCED DISTRIBUTION CO 11/13/2025 $ 22,472.73 807696 5110 ALUMINUM CHUCK WAGON 11/13/2025 $ 75,337.95 807698 4410 FRUIT GROWERS LABORATORY INC 11/13/2025 $ 4,623.00 807700 1810 GALLS LLC 11/13/2025 $ 16,943.85
807702 5110 GOLDEN EMPIRE TOWING INC 11/13/2025 $ 3,883.50 807705 4120 GRAINGER INC, W W 11/13/2025 $ 1,632.28
807711 0110 HOME DEPOT 11/13/2025 $ 6,816.35
807713 4310 JERRY & KEITHS INC 11/13/2025 $ 6,182.00
807715 5110 JIM BURKE FORD 11/13/2025 $ 25,158.42
807717 4210 K & I SERVICES INC 11/13/2025 $ 32,503.00
807719 5110 KERN MACHINERY INC 11/13/2025 $ 2,685.35
807722 0110 KERN TURF SUPPLY 11/13/2025 $ 4,888.25
807724 0110 LOWES HOME IMPROVEMENT 11/13/2025 $ 1,518.89 807726 4210 MINUTEMAN PRESS 11/13/2025 $ 10,723.77
807731 5110 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 11/13/2025 $ 3,119.35
807733 5110 QUINN COMPANY INC 11/13/2025 $ 37,848.87
807736 0110 STINSON STATIONERS 11/13/2025 $ 10,066.97
807738 5110 TYACK TIRES INC 11/13/2025 $ 15,702.82
807740 4410 UNIFIED FIELD SERVICES CORPORATION 11/13/2025 $ 37,424.33 807744 4120 VESTIS SERVICES LLC 11/13/2025 $ 6,045.84
807745 0110 A T & T 11/13/2025 $ 525.00
807746 0110 A T & T 11/13/2025 $ 806.08
807747 5110 A-1 ALTERNATIVE FUEL SYSTEMS 11/13/2025 $ 992.84 807748 1110 Adelina M Carter 11/13/2025 $ 267.83
807749 0110 ADVANCED DATA STORAGE INC 11/13/2025 $ 604.30 807750 1860 ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELD 11/13/2025 $ 83,329.00 807751 4120 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC 11/13/2025 $ 2,226.50 807752 0110 AEG MANAGEMENT BAKERSFIELD LLC 11/13/2025 $ 1,168.75 807753 5110 AEP CALIFORNIA LLC 11/13/2025 $ 1,261.61
807758 0110 ALEX BERNAL 11/13/2025 $ 75.00
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 2
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
807759 0140 ALL AMERICAN CARPET 11/13/2025 $ 40,198.25
807760 5110 ALL THAT LETTERING SIGN COMPANY 11/13/2025 $ 130.00 807761 0140 AMAROK LLC 11/13/2025 $ 17,279.89
807762 0110 AMERICAN POLYGRAPH ASSOCIATION 11/13/2025 $ 175.00 807763 0140 AMERICAN SAFETY SERVICES INC 11/13/2025 $ 907.96 807764 1110 AMERINATIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC 11/13/2025 $ 6,375.00 807765 0110 AMS LEGAL SUPPORT SERVICES INC 11/13/2025 $ 19.90 807766 0110 ANDREW ESQUIVEL 11/13/2025 $ 100.00
807767 0110 ANTHONY BACA 11/13/2025 $ 250.00
807768 5110 APPLIED LNG TECHNOLOGIES LLC 11/13/2025 $ 5,365.22 807769 1910 ARGO CHEMICAL INC 11/13/2025 $ 4,930.60
807770 0110 ARTHUR JOVEN 11/13/2025 $ 75.00
807772 1910 ASSOCIATIONS WEST 11/13/2025 $ 3,600.00
807773 5110 AUTO TECH AND SMOG 11/13/2025 $ 96.00
807774 5110 AUTOZONE STORES INC 11/13/2025 $ 450.68
807775 5110 B & B SURPLUS 11/13/2025 $ 163.73
807776 4310 B & R TOOL SUPPLY INC 11/13/2025 $ 50.69
807777 0110 BACSCO 11/13/2025 $ 662.73
807778 9110 BAK BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE 11/13/2025 $ 687.99 807779 0110 BAKER SUPPLIES AND REPAIRS 11/13/2025 $ 3,612.20 807780 0140 BAKER TILLY ADVISORY GROUP LP 11/13/2025 $ 3,525.00 807781 4210 BAKERSFIELD ARC 11/13/2025 $ 1,598.65
807782 3160 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN 11/13/2025 $ 3,216.85 807783 5110 BAKERSFIELD HARLEY DAVIDSON INC 11/13/2025 $ 861.24 807784 0110 BAKERSFIELD IRRIGATION 11/13/2025 $ 145.34
807785 5110 BAKERSFIELD TRUCK CENTER 11/13/2025 $ 803.63 807786 4110 BANK OF MARIN 11/13/2025 $ 8,976.95
807787 5110 BARNES WELDING SUPPLY 11/13/2025 $ 1,739.85 807788 0110 BARNETT'S TOWING SERVICE INC 11/13/2025 $ 50.00 807789 1740 BAUER COMPRESSORS INCORPORATED 11/13/2025 $ 870.10 807790 0140 BE FINALLY FREE INC 11/13/2025 $ 27,931.89
807791 5110 BEARCAT MFG INC 11/13/2025 $ 1,769.93
807792 0140 BENCHMARK POLYGRAPH & TRUTH ASSESSMENT 11/13/2025 $ 2,805.00 807793 5110 BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO 11/13/2025 $ 365.76
807794 5110 BLACKHOLE TECHNOLOGIES INC 11/13/2025 $ 8,032.90 807795 5110 BOBS WHOLESALE AUTO GLASS 11/13/2025 $ 125.00 807796 0110 BOLLES NURSERY LANDSCAPE 11/13/2025 $ 660.31 807797 6150 BOLTHOUSE LAND COMPANY LLC-REFUND 11/13/2025 $ 6,957.60 807798 5110 BORN AGAIN BODYWORKS 11/13/2025 $ 12,372.19 807799 4310 BOWMAN ASPHALT 11/13/2025 $ 10,400.00
807800 4120 BRADY INDUSTRIES 11/13/2025 $ 1,546.16
807801 4410 BSK ASSOCIATES 11/13/2025 $ 10,161.75
807802 5110 BUDGET BOLT INC 11/13/2025 $ 102.29
807803 4210 BURRTEC KERN LLC 11/13/2025 $ 3,184.50
807804 0110 CAL VALLEY EQUIPMENT INC 11/13/2025 $ 878.39 807805 0110 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL STATISTICS INC 11/13/2025 $ 600.00 807806 0110 CALIFORNIA SURVEYING & DRAFTING SUPPLY 11/13/2025 $ 535.84 807807 0110 Carina Y Ortiz 11/13/2025 $ 323.13
807808 5110 CARNEYS BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY CTR INC 11/13/2025 $ 431.35 807809 0110 CCS FACILITY SERVICES 11/13/2025 $ 7,227.00 807810 1910 CENTRAL CAL SURVEYS 11/13/2025 $ 1,900.00
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 3
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
807811 0110 CHAMINDA DISSANAYAKE 11/13/2025 $ 550.00
807812 3120 CHAMPION HARDWARE 11/13/2025 $ 3,959.08
807813 0110 Chelsea M Dunaway 11/13/2025 $ 89.96
807814 5110 CHESTER AVENUE BRAKE & SUPPLY 11/13/2025 $ 2,097.96 807815 0110 Chris Borden 11/13/2025 $ 405.00
807816 5110 Christian Duran 11/13/2025 $ 85.25
807817 0110 CHRISTOPHER ROBERTSON 11/13/2025 $ 250.00
807818 0140 CITIGUARD INC 11/13/2025 $ 48,482.88
807819 0110 CLIFFORD & BROWN TRUST 11/13/2025 $ 95,573.72 807820 0110 COLANTUONO HIGHSMITH & WHATLEY PC 11/13/2025 $ 592.50 807821 5110 CONCOURSE TECH INC. 11/13/2025 $ 32,936.52
807822 4120 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS IN 11/13/2025 $ 53.90 807823 0110 CONTRABAND CONTROL SPECIALISTS INC 11/13/2025 $ 953.00 807824 0110 CREATIVE FINANCIAL STAFFING LLC 11/13/2025 $ 3,153.50 807825 0110 CRITTERS WITHOUT LITTERS 11/13/2025 $ 49,830.00 807826 0110 CSI EXTERMINATORS INC 11/13/2025 $ 645.00
807827 5110 CUMMINS SALES AND SERVICE 11/13/2025 $ 564.85 807828 0110 CVIN LLC DBA VAST NETWORKS 11/13/2025 $ 1,199.00 807829 4310 Daniel R Maldonado 11/13/2025 $ 672.20
807830 5110 DAVES FLEET MAINT & TOWING INC 11/13/2025 $ 50.00 807832 4210 DELTA LIQUID ENERGY 11/13/2025 $ 376.07
807833 0110 DR RONALD OSTROM 11/13/2025 $ 1,000.00
807834 9110 DW1-CVS "STINE" 11/13/2025 $ 629.70
807835 9110 DW1-KOHL'S "ROSEDALE" 11/13/2025 $ 1,413.15 807836 5110 E J WARD INCORPORATED 11/13/2025 $ 506.37
807838 0110 Eileen Lewis 11/13/2025 $ 147.11
807839 1110 EL POPULAR INC 11/13/2025 $ 90.00
807840 5110 ELBERT DISTRIBUTING 11/13/2025 $ 177.23
807841 0110 ELEAD RESOURCES, INC. 11/13/2025 $ 790.38
807842 0110 Eli D Brown 11/13/2025 $ 435.00
807843 0140 EMTS INC 11/13/2025 $ 50,351.00
807844 0110 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 11/13/2025 $ 130.45
807845 0110 ENVIROTEK CORPORATION 11/13/2025 $ 4,999.06 807846 0110 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 11/13/2025 $ 869.21 807847 5110 F F GOMEZ INC 11/13/2025 $ 90.99
807848 5110 FAST UNDERCAR LLC 11/13/2025 $ 1,560.77
807850 4410 FEDEX 11/13/2025 $ 186.33
807851 0110 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 11/13/2025 $ 2,216.85 807852 0110 FFP FUND VI P2 PROJECTCO5 LLC 11/13/2025 $ 2,907.12 807853 0110 FFP FUND VI P2 PROJECTCO8 LLC 11/13/2025 $ 3,013.12 807854 0140 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY 11/13/2025 $ 1,364.00 807855 4110 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES INC 11/13/2025 $ 636.47 807856 4110 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 11/13/2025 $ 1,067.28
807857 5110 FLEET SERVICES TOWING INC 11/13/2025 $ 50.00 807858 4210 FLS SUPPLY 11/13/2025 $ 110.42
807859 0110 FOREFRONT POWER DEVELOPMENT LLC 11/13/2025 $ 6,778.28 807860 5110 FRANK J ZAMBONI & CO INC 11/13/2025 $ 72.69 807861 4110 G S E CONSTRUCTION CO INC 11/13/2025 $ 170,562.08 807862 0110 GCI EQUIPMENT RENTAL 11/13/2025 $ 189.44
807864 5110 GIBBS INTERNATIONAL TRUCK CENTER 11/13/2025 $ 250.10 807865 0110 GLOBALSTAR USA INC 11/13/2025 $ 212.54
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 4
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
807866 5110 GOLDEN STATE PETERBILT 11/13/2025 $ 6,881.99 807867 3120 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY 11/13/2025 $ 205.39 807868 0140 GREATER BAKERSFIELD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 11/13/2025 $ 600.00 807869 0110 GREEN RUBBER - KENNEDY AG 11/13/2025 $ 270.85 807870 5110 GREGS PETROLEUM SERVICES INC 11/13/2025 $ 7,172.68 807871 5110 H & S BODY WORKS & TOWING 11/13/2025 $ 50.00 807872 5110 HADDAD DODGE 11/13/2025 $ 1,576.36
807874 0140 HANSENS MOVING & STORAGE INC 11/13/2025 $ 300.00 807875 1210 HIGH LIGHT ELECTRIC INC 11/13/2025 $ 111,608.45 807876 3120 HIGHSTREET IT SOLUTIONS LLC 11/13/2025 $ 12,250.33 807877 0120 HOLLY VILLATORO-REFUND 11/13/2025 $ 250.50
807878 3110 HPS MECHANICAL INC 11/13/2025 $ 4,405.85
807879 5110 HYDRAULIC CONTROLS INC 11/13/2025 $ 190.53
807880 0140 INCOGNITO DESIGNZ 11/13/2025 $ 621.79
807881 0120 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 11/13/2025 $ 2,677.50 807882 0110 IRON MOUNTAIN 11/13/2025 $ 176.24
807883 0110 Jacob C Heinsohn 11/13/2025 $ 435.00
807884 0110 Jacob I Erakat 11/13/2025 $ 435.00
807885 0110 James K Jones 11/13/2025 $ 2,297.74
807886 0140 Jamie Achterberg 11/13/2025 $ 460.64
807887 0120 JAS PACIFIC INC 11/13/2025 $ 2,002.50
807888 0110 Jesse J Perez 11/13/2025 $ 435.00
807889 5110 Jesus Estrada 11/13/2025 $ 1,643.25
807890 5110 JIM BURKE LINCOLN MERCURY 11/13/2025 $ 3,970.01 807891 5110 JIMS TOWING INC 11/13/2025 $ 100.00
807892 0110 Joaquin S Valladares 11/13/2025 $ 165.00
807893 0110 JOE MONTELONGO 11/13/2025 $ 200.00
807894 4310 Joshua C Tristan 11/13/2025 $ 359.00
807895 0110 K C S O S 11/13/2025 $ 25,825.99
807896 5110 KELLAR EQUIPMENT HOSE AND REPAIR INC 11/13/2025 $ 8,953.80 807897 0140 KERN BUILDING MATERIALS 11/13/2025 $ 1,772.92 807898 1860 KERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 11/13/2025 $ 113,839.35 807899 0110 KERN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 11/13/2025 $ 87,241.53 807900 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/13/2025 $ 50.00
807901 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/13/2025 $ 50.00
807902 0110 KERN PRINT SERVICES INC 11/13/2025 $ 744.85 807903 4210 KERN REFUSE DISPOSAL, INC 11/13/2025 $ 183,130.21 807904 0110 KERN RIVER POWER EQUIPMENT 11/13/2025 $ 602.54 807905 0110 KEVIN DALMAS 11/13/2025 $ 150.00
807906 4210 KILLIAN PEST CONTROL 11/13/2025 $ 465.00
807907 0110 KRONOS INCORPORATED 11/13/2025 $ 347.44
807908 5110 L A GRINDING INC 11/13/2025 $ 110.00
807909 0110 Lance P Powell 11/13/2025 $ 80.85
807910 0110 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 11/13/2025 $ 104.60
807911 0110 LEANDRO OLIVAREZ 11/13/2025 $ 250.00
807912 5110 LEHR 11/13/2025 $ 475.93
807913 0110 LINDE GAS & EQUIPMENT DBA PRAXAIR 11/13/2025 $ 236.98 807914 1740 Luke M Preece 11/13/2025 $ 316.80
807915 4310 M & S SECURITY SERVICES 11/13/2025 $ 3,841.80 807917 0110 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY 11/13/2025 $ 218.67
807918 0140 MCCORMICKS LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 11/13/2025 $ 16,508.00 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 5
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
807919 3120 MCDANIELS CONSTRUCTION 11/13/2025 $ 69,626.75 807920 4310 MEYER CIVIL ENGINEERING INC 11/13/2025 $ 5,888.50 807921 5110 MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA INC 11/13/2025 $ 3,513.30 807922 0110 MINUTEMAN PRESS 11/13/2025 $ 163.85
807923 5110 MOTOR CITY SALES & SERVICE 11/13/2025 $ 1,480.75 807924 0140 MOUNTAIN TEK 11/13/2025 $ 1,144.40
807925 0120 Nancy Garcia 11/13/2025 $ 676.00
807926 0110 Nathan A Anderberg 11/13/2025 $ 435.00
807927 4120 NEW GEN ENGINEERING GROUP INC DBA MCINT 11/13/2025 $ 16,500.00 807928 0110 NEW GENERATION GRAPHICS 11/13/2025 $ 487.13 807929 0110 NISHIKAWA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE INC 11/13/2025 $ 10,488.50 807930 5110 NISSAN OF BAKERSFIELD 11/13/2025 $ 495.29
807931 0140 NORMAN A TRAUB ASSOCIATES 11/13/2025 $ 2,100.00 807932 5110 NORTH BAKERSFIELD TOYOTA 11/13/2025 $ 674.44 807933 4120 NORTHWEST METROLOGY 11/13/2025 $ 560.00
807934 4310 NV5 INC 11/13/2025 $ 163,027.87
807935 0140 O'CONNOR PEST CONTROL 11/13/2025 $ 60.00
807936 5110 OFFICE1 11/13/2025 $ 6,724.82
807937 5110 ONE SOURCE PARTS LLC 11/13/2025 $ 270.95
807938 1740 ORANGE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION - REFUND 11/13/2025 $ 719.00 807939 6310 P & A ADMINISTRATION SERVICES INC 11/13/2025 $ 11,784.52 807940 4210 PATRIOT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 11/13/2025 $ 2,250.00 807941 5110 PAYLESS TOWING 11/13/2025 $ 50.00
807942 0110 PECKHAM & MCKENNEY 11/13/2025 $ 9,333.33
807943 0110 PEOPLE FACTS LLC 11/13/2025 $ 16.67
807944 5110 PERFORMANCE TRUCK REPAIR 11/13/2025 $ 18,996.93 807945 5110 PLUMBERS DEPOT 11/13/2025 $ 319.12
807946 0110 PREMIER OVERHEAD DOOR & GATES 11/13/2025 $ 1,541.41 807947 4110 PRIMO BRANDS 11/13/2025 $ 345.76
807948 0140 QCS QUICK CUSTOM SIGNS 11/13/2025 $ 1,575.72 807949 0110 RANCHO TREE SERVICE 11/13/2025 $ 21,896.20
807950 0110 RANDYS TOWING LLC 11/13/2025 $ 3,945.25
807951 5110 RAY GASKIN SERVICE INC 11/13/2025 $ 4,097.51 807952 0110 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST. INC 11/13/2025 $ 102.16 807953 0110 REGIONAL OCCUPATIONAL CENTER 11/13/2025 $ 890.00 807954 0110 Renee S Garcia 11/13/2025 $ 435.00
807955 5110 RENEWELL FLEET SERVICE LLC 11/13/2025 $ 779.38 807956 0140 RESCUE DIRECT 11/13/2025 $ 4,235.69
807957 5110 RICHARDS CRANE SERVICE LLC 11/13/2025 $ 550.00 807958 0110 RINCON CONSULTANTS INC 11/13/2025 $ 50,884.03 807959 0110 ROUND-UP FEED AND PET SUPPLY 11/13/2025 $ 83.64 807960 0110 Ryan B Vaughan 11/13/2025 $ 135.00
807961 0110 Ryan P Clark 11/13/2025 $ 135.00
807962 4110 SAMANDEEP BHOGAL BEHL AND TEGJIT KAUR - 11/13/2025 $ 690.27 807963 0110 SAN DIEGO LANDSYSTEMS LLC 11/13/2025 $ 19,560.00 807964 5110 SAN JOAQUIN TIRES & WHEELS 11/13/2025 $ 179.90 807965 5110 SEHI COMPUTER PRODUCTS INC 11/13/2025 $ 6,576.98 807966 5110 SILVAS OIL CO INC 11/13/2025 $ 33,124.44
807967 5110 SIZEUP INC 11/13/2025 $ 4,995.00
807968 5110 SJE DBA PRIMEX 11/13/2025 $ 4,950.00
807969 5110 SMITH & SON TIRE INC 11/13/2025 $ 2,765.80
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 6
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
807970 5110 SOLUTIONS 11/13/2025 $ 4,880.00
807971 4410 SOUTH VALLEY COMPANIES INC 11/13/2025 $ 35,888.98 807972 5110 SPARTAN TRUCK CO INC 11/13/2025 $ 1,428.88
807973 3120 SPERIDIAN TECHNOLOGIES 11/13/2025 $ 7,916.66 807974 0110 STANDARD PLUMBING SUPPLY DBA FLOYDS 11/13/2025 $ 143.82 807975 1860 STAPLES ENERGY 11/13/2025 $ 29,953.25
807977 0110 STEVE HOLLOWAY PAINTING 11/13/2025 $ 9,843.70 807978 0110 SWEANEY INC 11/13/2025 $ 7,548.92
807979 0110 TEL TEC SECURITY SYSTEM INC 11/13/2025 $ 110.00 807980 4210 TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS 11/13/2025 $ 8,797.72
807981 0140 THE CALIFORNIA ACADEMY FOR ECONOMIC DEV 11/13/2025 $ 150.00 807982 1860 THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK 11/13/2025 $ 37,645.91 807983 4210 TOTER LLC 11/13/2025 $ 46,032.40
807984 0110 TRANS-WEST SECURITY INC 11/13/2025 $ 6,771.30 807986 4210 TRINITY CONSULTANTS 11/13/2025 $ 14,555.67
807987 0110 U.S. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PLAN 11/13/2025 $ 1,553.90 807988 5110 UKG KRONOS SYSTEMS LLC 11/13/2025 $ 66,640.00 807989 5110 UNITED RENTALS NORTH AMERICA INC 11/13/2025 $ 1,105.22 807990 0110 UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND SCREENING INC 11/13/2025 $ 540.50 807991 0110 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTEMS INC 11/13/2025 $ 1,749.00 807992 0110 VERITEXT 11/13/2025 $ 2,515.00
807993 4110 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/13/2025 $ 1,930.96
807994 1710 VERRA MOBILITY DBA AMERICAN TRAFFIC SO 11/13/2025 $ 56,802.40 807995 3120 VERTEX ONE SOFTWARE LLC 11/13/2025 $ 14,187.41 807996 0110 VESTIS FIRST AID AND SAFETY LLC 11/13/2025 $ 259.42 807997 4120 VWR INTERNATIONAL 11/13/2025 $ 881.96
807998 0110 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 11/13/2025 $ 2,436.32
807999 4310 WESTAIR GASES & EQUIPMENT INC 11/13/2025 $ 69.24 808000 5110 WESTCOAST HYDRAULICS 11/13/2025 $ 2,936.12
808001 0110 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 11/13/2025 $ 58.54 808002 0120 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 11/13/2025 $ 672.00
808004 5110 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 11/13/2025 $ 365.17 808005 5110 ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC. 11/13/2025 $ 58.83 808006 5110 A T & T 11/20/2025 $ 24,593.18
808007 5110 A T & T 11/20/2025 $ 198.55
808008 5110 A T & T 11/20/2025 $ 9,172.96
808009 0140 A T & T MOBILITY 11/20/2025 $ 4,620.21
808010 4210 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY ADOPTION CO 11/20/2025 $ 54,370.24 808011 0110 CALIFORNIA SURFACE SOLUTIONS INC 11/20/2025 $ 5,550.00 808013 0110 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/20/2025 $ 152,229.61 808020 0110 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 11/20/2025 $ 33,439.85
808021 0110 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 11/20/2025 $ 360.00 808022 0140 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 11/20/2025 $ 818.00
808023 0110 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 11/20/2025 $ 48,747.13 808024 4410 KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY 11/20/2025 $ 73,118.80 808027 4210 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 11/20/2025 $ 275,715.89 808028 5110 SJVAPCD 11/20/2025 $ 628.00
808029 0110 SOCALGAS 11/20/2025 $ 15.08
808030 4120 VAUGHN WATER CO., INC. 11/20/2025 $ 68.88
808033 5110 ADVANCED DISTRIBUTION CO 11/20/2025 $ 14,910.43 808037 4120 BRADY INDUSTRIES 11/20/2025 $ 2,710.20
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 7
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808039 0110 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS IN 11/20/2025 $ 1,416.26 808041 5110 GOLDEN STATE PETERBILT 11/20/2025 $ 5,123.09 808043 0110 GRAINGER INC, W W 11/20/2025 $ 2,691.28
808046 1510 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC 11/20/2025 $ 305,252.91 808052 0110 HOME DEPOT 11/20/2025 $ 4,172.55
808054 0110 KERN TURF SUPPLY 11/20/2025 $ 7,267.57
808056 0110 KILLIAN PEST CONTROL 11/20/2025 $ 1,635.00
808060 0110 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC 11/20/2025 $ 14,463.91 808062 5110 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 11/20/2025 $ 1,878.60
808065 0140 PIONEER PAINT 11/20/2025 $ 18,671.94
808067 4210 PREMIER VALLEY TRANSPORT INC 11/20/2025 $ 29,610.00 808070 5110 SILVAS OIL CO INC 11/20/2025 $ 58,814.31
808072 3120 STANDARD PLUMBING SUPPLY DBA FLOYDS 11/20/2025 $ 416.87 808077 4310 STINSON STATIONERS 11/20/2025 $ 19,569.70
808084 0110 VESTIS SERVICES LLC 11/20/2025 $ 8,276.90
808085 0110 A T & T 11/20/2025 $ 1,400.00
808086 5110 A-1 ALTERNATIVE FUEL SYSTEMS 11/20/2025 $ 1,281.18 808087 3120 A-C ELECTRIC COMPANY 11/20/2025 $ 51,817.68 808088 0110 ABC OCCUPATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 11/20/2025 $ 5,102.00 808089 0110 ACC BUSINESS 11/20/2025 $ 160.00
808090 4120 ACCELERATED ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 11/20/2025 $ 8,002.25 808091 1210 ACCENTURE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CAPITAL PR 11/20/2025 $ 403,094.59 808092 0110 ADVANCED DATA STORAGE INC 11/20/2025 $ 757.56 808093 5110 AEP CALIFORNIA LLC 11/20/2025 $ 35,833.30
808094 0140 ALL AMERICAN UNIFORMS LLC 11/20/2025 $ 15,384.70 808095 6110 ALS GOLDEN WEST - REFUND 11/20/2025 $ 500.00 808096 0110 AMERICAN RED CROSS 11/20/2025 $ 418.00
808097 1110 AMERINATIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC 11/20/2025 $ 1,080.63 808099 5110 APPLIED LNG TECHNOLOGIES LLC 11/20/2025 $ 500.00 808100 5110 AUTO TECH AND SMOG 11/20/2025 $ 96.00
808101 5110 AUTOZONE STORES INC 11/20/2025 $ 319.72
808102 3350 B & B SURPLUS 11/20/2025 $ 75.78
808103 4310 B & R TOOL SUPPLY INC 11/20/2025 $ 481.64
808104 3110 BACSCO 11/20/2025 $ 87.39
808105 0110 BAKER SUPPLIES AND REPAIRS 11/20/2025 $ 1,257.41 808106 3120 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN 11/20/2025 $ 924.98 808107 5110 BAKERSFIELD CHRYSLER-JEEP 11/20/2025 $ 1,181.39 808108 5110 BAKERSFIELD TRUCK CENTER 11/20/2025 $ 1,381.48 808109 0110 BARNES WELDING SUPPLY 11/20/2025 $ 494.31
808110 4210 BEJAC CORPORATION 11/20/2025 $ 129,427.60
808111 5110 BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO 11/20/2025 $ 508.75
808112 5110 BLACKHOLE TECHNOLOGIES INC 11/20/2025 $ 30,657.32 808113 3160 BLUEPRINT SERVICE CO 11/20/2025 $ 667.49
808114 5110 BOBS WHOLESALE AUTO GLASS 11/20/2025 $ 894.75 808115 5110 BORN AGAIN BODYWORKS 11/20/2025 $ 18,420.76 808116 0140 BRANDCO MARKETING 11/20/2025 $ 299.34
808117 6110 BRANSON INDUSTRIES LLC - REFUND 11/20/2025 $ 13,800.00 808119 4120 BSK ASSOCIATES 11/20/2025 $ 615.00
808120 0110 BUDGET BOLT INC 11/20/2025 $ 248.17
808121 0110 C & P SANITARY SUPPLY 11/20/2025 $ 814.22
808122 4120 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AG 11/20/2025 $ 19,675.00 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 8
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808123 5110 CALIFORNIA FUELS & LUBRICANTS 11/20/2025 $ 131,764.46 808124 0110 CARL NICITA 11/20/2025 $ 25.00
808126 6110 CASA OF KERN COUNTY 11/20/2025 $ 500.00
808127 0110 CCI OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 11/20/2025 $ 332.04 808128 3110 CEN-CAL CONSTRUCTION INC 11/20/2025 $ 56,919.77 808129 0110 CHAMPION HARDWARE 11/20/2025 $ 255.78
808130 0110 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 11/20/2025 $ 120.00
808131 0110 Christopher S Bowles 11/20/2025 $ 213.00
808132 5110 CLEAN ENERGY INC 11/20/2025 $ 695.91
808133 5110 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT 11/20/2025 $ 172.31
808134 0110 CONTACT SECURITY INC 11/20/2025 $ 27,923.84 808135 0110 CRITTERS WITHOUT LITTERS 11/20/2025 $ 19,922.00 808136 0110 CSI EXTERMINATORS INC 11/20/2025 $ 1,075.00 808137 5110 CUMMINS SALES AND SERVICE 11/20/2025 $ 1,059.37 808138 0110 DAVE BANG ASSOCIATES INC 11/20/2025 $ 10,989.34 808139 5110 DAVES FLEET MAINT & TOWING INC 11/20/2025 $ 200.00 808140 4310 DAVID JANES COMPANY 11/20/2025 $ 252.82
808141 5110 DELL MARKETING L P 11/20/2025 $ 941.43
808142 4210 DELTA LIQUID ENERGY 11/20/2025 $ 379.81
808143 0110 DESOTO SALES INC 11/20/2025 $ 67.12
808144 0110 DL BROWN CONSTRUCTION INC 11/20/2025 $ 3,960.00 808145 0110 DOUMANIAN & ASSOCIATES - REFUND 11/20/2025 $ 1,375.00 808146 9110 DW1-TRUXTUN 11/20/2025 $ 2,728.85
808147 0140 EAN SERVICES LLC 11/20/2025 $ 17,615.81
808148 5110 ELBERT DISTRIBUTING 11/20/2025 $ 369.06
808149 4120 ELECTRIC MOTOR WORKS INC 11/20/2025 $ 1,515.50 808150 1740 ELITE1 FIRE PROTECTION CORP - REFUND 11/20/2025 $ 712.00 808151 4120 Emily R Winther 11/20/2025 $ 251.00
808152 0110 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 11/20/2025 $ 167.25
808153 0110 ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY SOLUTIONS 11/20/2025 $ 2,086.59 808154 5110 FAST UNDERCAR LLC 11/20/2025 $ 837.01
808155 0110 FEDEX 11/20/2025 $ 132.36
808156 0110 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 11/20/2025 $ 107.39 808157 0120 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES INC 11/20/2025 $ 663.59 808158 3120 FIRSTTWO INC. 11/20/2025 $ 25,000.00
808159 1170 GCI EQUIPMENT RENTAL 11/20/2025 $ 652.17
808161 3110 GG VENDING 11/20/2025 $ 3,897.00
808162 5110 GOLDEN EMPIRE TOWING INC 11/20/2025 $ 2,949.75 808163 9110 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION 11/20/2025 $ 1,056.01
808164 4120 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY 11/20/2025 $ 1,457.40 808165 5110 GREGS PETROLEUM SERVICES INC 11/20/2025 $ 5,213.54 808166 1860 GRIFFIN STRUCTURES INC 11/20/2025 $ 288,579.49 808167 1510 GRIFFITH COMPANY INC 11/20/2025 $ 1,053,596.25 808168 0110 HALL LETTER SHOP 11/20/2025 $ 424.88
808169 0110 HANSENS MOVING & STORAGE INC 11/20/2025 $ 378.00 808170 4120 HEALTHY FRESH JANITORIAL CLEAN LLC 11/20/2025 $ 3,149.00 808171 0110 HLP, INC 11/20/2025 $ 24.15
808172 5110 HYSTER COMPANY 11/20/2025 $ 67,830.00
808173 9110 IN-N-OUT BURGER #65 11/20/2025 $ 3,324.54
808174 0110 J & E RESTAURANT SUPPLY INC 11/20/2025 $ 336.65 808175 0110 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC 11/20/2025 $ 1,865.02 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 9
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808176 0110 JAMES G HAY 11/20/2025 $ 25.00
808177 0140 JASON CATER - VOID & REISSUE 11/20/2025 $ 867.58 808178 4410 Jeffery B Garnett 11/20/2025 $ 785.60
808179 9110 JEL, INC 11/20/2025 $ 3,921.79
808180 5110 JERRY & KEITHS INC 11/20/2025 $ 898.34
808181 5110 JIM BURKE FORD 11/20/2025 $ 2,080.68
808182 5110 JIM BURKE LINCOLN MERCURY 11/20/2025 $ 1,810.44 808183 5110 JIMS TOWING INC 11/20/2025 $ 50.00
808184 0110 JOHN STOVALL 11/20/2025 $ 25.00
808185 4210 JORGENSEN & CO 11/20/2025 $ 3,114.15
808186 0140 JOSES ORNAMENTAL SUPPLY INC 11/20/2025 $ 129.90 808187 0110 JTS CONSTRUCTION INC 11/20/2025 $ 7,980.00
808188 5110 K & R TOWING 11/20/2025 $ 50.00
808189 6110 K C S O S 11/20/2025 $ 1,748,218.15
808190 9110 KACHALLOWEEN SALES INC. 11/20/2025 $ 431.92 808191 0110 KATHLEEN THOMPSON 11/20/2025 $ 75.00
808192 1910 Kelly Kathleen Sloan 11/20/2025 $ 229.94
808193 1510 KERN ASPHALT PAVING & SEALING 11/20/2025 $ 2,080.00 808194 0110 KERN COUNTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER 11/20/2025 $ 99,234.86 808195 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/20/2025 $ 50.00
808196 5110 KERN MACHINERY INC 11/20/2025 $ 914.72
808197 0110 KERN PRINT SERVICES INC 11/20/2025 $ 239.18 808198 4210 KERN REFUSE DISPOSAL, INC 11/20/2025 $ 2,216,806.15 808199 0110 KERN RIVER POWER EQUIPMENT 11/20/2025 $ 268.75 808200 0110 KEVIN BURTON 11/20/2025 $ 50.00
808201 6110 KEVIN TRAN - REFUND 11/20/2025 $ 70.00
808202 1860 KIMLEY HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 11/20/2025 $ 35,650.00 808203 0110 KNIGHTS SITE SERVICES INC 11/20/2025 $ 5,964.11 808204 6110 KYLE CARTER HOMES-REFUND 11/20/2025 $ 10,000.00 808205 5110 L A GRINDING INC 11/20/2025 $ 110.00
808206 1450 LDD CONSTRUCTION INC 11/20/2025 $ 3,680.00
808207 6110 LEGACY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY - REFUND 11/20/2025 $ 700.00 808208 6240 LETZRING RAD LP C/O HOUSING AUTHORITY O 11/20/2025 $ 1,113,561.79 808209 0110 LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS INC 11/20/2025 $ 3,043.50 808210 4210 LOS DOS HERMANOS TRASH CREW LLC 11/20/2025 $ 2,395.00 808211 4410 LOWES HOME IMPROVEMENT 11/20/2025 $ 3,460.52 808212 0110 MCCORMICKS LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 11/20/2025 $ 7,054.00 808213 0110 MEDIWASTE DISPOSAL LLC 11/20/2025 $ 37.26
808215 3160 MEYER CIVIL ENGINEERING INC 11/20/2025 $ 26,880.00 808216 0110 Michael J Lencioni 11/20/2025 $ 1,031.17
808217 5110 MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA INC 11/20/2025 $ 8,144.00 808218 4210 MICHELLI WEIGHING & MEASUREMENTS 11/20/2025 $ 9,425.17 808219 0110 MIKE GEORGE 11/20/2025 $ 50.00
808220 0110 MINUTEMAN PRESS 11/20/2025 $ 1,013.75
808221 0140 MJS SOLUTIONS LLC 11/20/2025 $ 1,000.00
808222 9110 MOORE FLOORING INC 11/20/2025 $ 1,968.73
808223 5110 MOTOR CITY SALES & SERVICE 11/20/2025 $ 359.38 808224 0110 MOUNTAIN TEK 11/20/2025 $ 690.56
808225 4120 NEW GEN ENGINEERING GROUP INC DBA MCINT 11/20/2025 $ 9,680.00 808226 0110 NILA HOGAN 11/20/2025 $ 25.00
808227 5110 OFFICE1 11/20/2025 $ 56.59
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 10
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808228 0110 OPEN & SHUT ENTERPRISES 11/20/2025 $ 340.00 808229 3110 ORDIZ MELBY INC 11/20/2025 $ 2,120.00
808230 6310 P & A ADMINISTRATION SERVICES INC 11/20/2025 $ 12,903.62 808231 5110 P T O SALES CORP / TRUCKPRO LLC 11/20/2025 $ 177.52 808232 1210 PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP INC 11/20/2025 $ 104,580.61 808233 0110 PATRICK BOWERS 11/20/2025 $ 25.00
808234 5110 PB LOADER MANUFACTURING CO 11/20/2025 $ 229.46 808235 6110 PEOPLES MISSIONARY BABTIST CHURCH - REF 11/20/2025 $ 500.00 808236 5110 PERFORMANCE TRUCK REPAIR 11/20/2025 $ 48,200.50 808237 5110 PLUMBERS DEPOT 11/20/2025 $ 272.78
808238 5110 POWER MACHINERY CENTER 11/20/2025 $ 3,061.72 808239 0110 PRIMO BRANDS 11/20/2025 $ 122.91
808240 0140 PRINTS MAVERICKS LLC 11/20/2025 $ 70.36
808241 5110 QCS QUICK CUSTOM SIGNS 11/20/2025 $ 942.70
808242 4210 QUINN COMPANY INC 11/20/2025 $ 28,610.37
808243 5110 QUINN COMPANY INC - EQ 11/20/2025 $ 197,049.84 808244 0110 RAIN FOR RENT INC 11/20/2025 $ 33.77
808245 5110 RANDYS TOWING LLC 11/20/2025 $ 187.00
808246 5110 Ray Ramirez 11/20/2025 $ 700.00
808247 0110 RAYMONDS TROPHY AND AWARDS. INC. 11/20/2025 $ 21.11 808248 0110 READY REFRESH 11/20/2025 $ 37.80
808249 9110 REDBULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY 11/20/2025 $ 652.60 808250 0110 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST. INC 11/20/2025 $ 1,256.06 808251 1860 RENAISSANCE AT BAKER LP 11/20/2025 $ 217,500.00 808254 0110 S C ANDERSON INC 11/20/2025 $ 344,095.60
808255 0110 SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY 11/20/2025 $ 432.07 808256 9110 SMART & FINAL "STOCKDALE" 11/20/2025 $ 861.02 808257 5110 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 11/20/2025 $ 2,658.33
808258 0110 SNIDER'S INC 11/20/2025 $ 16.24
808259 4210 SOIL CONTROL LAB INC 11/20/2025 $ 2,754.00
808260 5110 SOLUTIONS 11/20/2025 $ 29,099.84
808261 5110 SOUTHSTAR ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, INC 11/20/2025 $ 2,052.50 808262 4210 STARS AND STRIPES 11/20/2025 $ 3,150.00
808263 0140 STEVE HOLLOWAY PAINTING 11/20/2025 $ 9,750.00 808264 0110 STEVEN P KINNEY 11/20/2025 $ 6,490.00
808265 6110 STOCKDALE HIGH SCHOOL - REFUND 11/20/2025 $ 500.00 808266 1510 SUNRISE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIFIC 11/20/2025 $ 1,701.16 808267 9110 SUSTAIN LLC 11/20/2025 $ 2,226.26
808268 9110 SWEANEY CUSTOM HOMES INC 11/20/2025 $ 565.92 808269 4310 SWRCB ACCOUNTING OFFICE 11/20/2025 $ 63,688.00 808270 0110 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 11/20/2025 $ 32,841.98 808271 4120 TEL TEC SECURITY SYSTEM INC 11/20/2025 $ 350.00 808272 0140 TERRY BEDFORD CONCRETE 11/20/2025 $ 10,000.00 808273 5110 THE DRALA PROJECT INC 11/20/2025 $ 195,711.22 808274 1120 THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK 11/20/2025 $ 105,430.19 808275 5110 THREE-WAY CHEVROLET 11/20/2025 $ 149.01
808276 0110 TOM EDMONDS 11/20/2025 $ 50.00
808277 0140 TRANS-WEST SECURITY INC 11/20/2025 $ 23,118.66 808278 5110 TYACK TIRES INC 11/20/2025 $ 2,537.47
808279 0110 U S BANK CM-9703 11/20/2025 $ 3,000.00
808280 0110 UNITED REFRIGERATION INC 11/20/2025 $ 142.76 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 11
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808281 1910 US SPORTS CONGRESS LLC 11/20/2025 $ 5,700.00 808282 4120 USP TECHNOLOGIES 11/20/2025 $ 39,622.10
808283 0110 VIATRON SYSTEMS INC 11/20/2025 $ 789.00
808284 4120 VULCAN INDUSTRIES INC 11/20/2025 $ 109,528.44 808285 4410 WESTAIR GASES & EQUIPMENT INC 11/20/2025 $ 200.59 808286 5110 WESTCOAST HYDRAULICS 11/20/2025 $ 1,990.59
808287 0140 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 11/20/2025 $ 505.86 808288 5110 WILLIAMS CLEANING SYSTEMS INC 11/20/2025 $ 6,090.57 808289 9110 WM-PEP BOYS "WHITE LN" 11/20/2025 $ 788.25
808290 5110 WRENS HYDRAULICS INC 11/20/2025 $ 333.45
808291 0110 A T & T 11/26/2025 $ 4,765.64
808292 0110 BAKERSFIELD CITY EMPLOYEE FEDERAL CREDI 11/26/2025 $ 1,742.00 808293 0110 BOWMAN ASPHALT 11/26/2025 $ 1,459,207.32
808294 5110 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE AD 11/26/2025 $ 1,528.00 808295 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/26/2025 $ 62,340.00 808296 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/26/2025 $ 842,770.09 808297 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/26/2025 $ 1,810.02 808298 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/26/2025 $ 4,752.69 808299 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/26/2025 $ 1,090.53 808300 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/26/2025 $ 18,213.23 808302 5110 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 11/26/2025 $ 27,466.45 808303 0110 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 11/26/2025 $ 285.90
808306 0110 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 11/26/2025 $ 8,115.49
808307 0110 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 11/26/2025 $ 3,228.21
808308 0140 CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING 11/26/2025 $ 2,062.33 808309 0110 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 11/26/2025 $ 544.00
808310 1860 JAMES NARDUCCI DBA AMESTOY HOTEL 11/26/2025 $ 25,863.64 808311 4410 KERN DELTA WATER DISTRICT 11/26/2025 $ 28,764.57 808312 4310 NORTH KERN WATER STORAGE DISTRICT 11/26/2025 $ 63,423.86 808313 3160 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CFM/PPC 11/26/2025 $ 7,247.86 808315 0110 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 11/26/2025 $ 11,185.58 808316 6180 SGMA CC C/O BUENA VISTA 11/26/2025 $ 50,090.32 808317 4120 SOCALGAS 11/26/2025 $ 27.31
808318 0110 US POSTAL SERVICE (QUADIENT-POC) 11/26/2025 $ 25,000.00 808322 5110 ADVANCED DISTRIBUTION CO 11/26/2025 $ 24,369.94 808324 5110 ALUMINUM CHUCK WAGON 11/26/2025 $ 18,827.24 808326 3160 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN 11/26/2025 $ 3,712.92 808328 5110 BLACKHOLE TECHNOLOGIES INC 11/26/2025 $ 6,604.20 808330 0110 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS IN 11/26/2025 $ 4,521.60 808332 4120 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 11/26/2025 $ 45,383.24 808334 5110 GOLDEN STATE PETERBILT 11/26/2025 $ 1,855.72 808337 4120 GRAINGER INC, W W 11/26/2025 $ 2,546.23
808339 3110 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC 11/26/2025 $ 539,683.94 808347 0120 HOME DEPOT 11/26/2025 $ 11,252.95
808349 5110 JIM BURKE FORD 11/26/2025 $ 14,633.91
808351 0110 KERN COUNTY FORENSIC SERVICES LLC 11/26/2025 $ 17,250.00 808353 4510 KERN TURF SUPPLY 11/26/2025 $ 6,230.86
808357 4310 LOWES HOME IMPROVEMENT 11/26/2025 $ 3,699.64 808361 5110 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 11/26/2025 $ 2,313.11
808363 3110 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST. INC 11/26/2025 $ 2,495.87 808366 1450 SAN JOAQUIN FENCE & SUPPLY 11/26/2025 $ 26,696.52 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 12
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808372 0110 STINSON STATIONERS 11/26/2025 $ 23,043.18
808374 0110 T-MOBILE USA 11/26/2025 $ 1,725.00
808377 4410 TEL TEC SECURITY SYSTEM INC 11/26/2025 $ 4,435.70 808378 0110 A 1 PRECISION BUILDERS 11/26/2025 $ 15,000.00 808379 0110 A T & T 11/26/2025 $ 1,400.00
808380 0110 ABATECO INCORPORATED 11/26/2025 $ 4,600.00
808381 0110 ADVANCED DATA STORAGE INC 11/26/2025 $ 1,128.50 808382 4110 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC 11/26/2025 $ 21,317.50 808383 5110 AEP CALIFORNIA LLC 11/26/2025 $ 120,175.36
808384 5110 AFFINITY TRUCK CENTER 11/26/2025 $ 4,048.67 808386 0110 ALEJANDRO ESPARZA MARQUEZ - RETIREE 11/26/2025 $ 42.50 808387 0110 Alexandria C Asuncion 11/26/2025 $ 172.33
808388 4310 ALLIED WEED CONTROL INC 11/26/2025 $ 525.00 808389 6110 AMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER ORGANIZATION-REGI 11/26/2025 $ 7,040.00 808390 0110 ANITA J ROWE - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808392 5110 APPLIED LNG TECHNOLOGIES LLC 11/26/2025 $ 16,745.64 808393 4410 ARDURRA GROUP INC 11/26/2025 $ 36,447.05
808394 0110 ARGO CHEMICAL INC 11/26/2025 $ 5,896.30
808395 0140 ARTS COUNCIL OF KERN 11/26/2025 $ 39,312.71 808397 5110 AUTO TECH AND SMOG 11/26/2025 $ 96.00
808398 0140 AUTO TINT WEST INC 11/26/2025 $ 666.73
808399 5110 AUTOZONE STORES INC 11/26/2025 $ 711.57
808400 0120 AVOLVE SOFTWARE CORPORATION 11/26/2025 $ 11,343.75 808401 5110 B & B SURPLUS 11/26/2025 $ 546.13
808402 0110 BACSCO 11/26/2025 $ 177.25
808403 0110 BAKER SUPPLIES AND REPAIRS 11/26/2025 $ 3,093.78 808404 5110 BAKERSFIELD CHRYSLER-JEEP 11/26/2025 $ 246.14 808405 4410 BAKERSFIELD WELL & PUMP 11/26/2025 $ 131,038.00 808406 5110 BARBER AUTOMOTIVE GROUP 11/26/2025 $ 890.52 808407 0140 BARNES WELDING SUPPLY 11/26/2025 $ 319.11
808408 3160 BEADOR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC 11/26/2025 $ 203,121.05 808409 4210 BEJAC CORPORATION 11/26/2025 $ 2,713.21
808410 0110 BELINDA ROWLAND - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50 808411 5110 BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO 11/26/2025 $ 291.43
808412 0120 BETTER EARTH ELECTRIC-REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 266.00 808413 0110 BILL OFFENBURGER - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50 808414 0110 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 11/26/2025 $ 656,036.43 808415 0110 BLUEPRINT SERVICE CO 11/26/2025 $ 653.27
808416 5110 BOBS WHOLESALE AUTO GLASS 11/26/2025 $ 1,517.73 808417 5110 BORN AGAIN BODYWORKS 11/26/2025 $ 1,419.24
808418 4120 BRADY INDUSTRIES 11/26/2025 $ 46.29
808420 5110 BROCKS TRAILER 11/26/2025 $ 135.31
808421 0110 BRUCE FRITZ - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808422 0110 BRYAN M BURROW 11/26/2025 $ 75.00
808423 4110 BSK ASSOCIATES 11/26/2025 $ 9,938.47
808424 0110 BSW ROOFING CONTRACTORS INC 11/26/2025 $ 1,082.50 808425 0110 BUDGET BOLT INC 11/26/2025 $ 230.03
808426 0110 BUILDING ELECTRONIC CONTROLS INC 11/26/2025 $ 825.00 808427 3110 C A RASMUSSEN INC 11/26/2025 $ 1,380,345.18 808428 4120 C W E A 11/26/2025 $ 502.00
808429 5110 CALIFORNIA FUELS & LUBRICANTS 11/26/2025 $ 36,216.21 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 13
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808430 0110 CALIFORNIA SAFETY TRAINING CORP 11/26/2025 $ 300.00 808431 0110 CDW GOVERNMENT 11/26/2025 $ 1,252.67
808432 0110 CECIL BOWEN - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808433 3160 CEN-CAL CONSTRUCTION INC 11/26/2025 $ 206,991.52 808434 3110 CENTENNIAL ASPHALT COMPANY 11/26/2025 $ 5,008.56 808435 4120 CENTRISYS CENTRIFUGE SYSTEMS 11/26/2025 $ 413,734.96 808436 4120 CERTEX USA, LLC 11/26/2025 $ 1,183.53
808437 0110 CHAMPION HARDWARE 11/26/2025 $ 1,212.40
808438 5110 CHART INDUSTRIES 11/26/2025 $ 931.29
808439 0110 CHEM PRO LABORATORY LLC 11/26/2025 $ 2,318.00 808440 0110 CHERYL CLAYBORN - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50 808441 5110 CHESTER AVENUE BRAKE & SUPPLY 11/26/2025 $ 1,417.64 808442 0110 CHRISTIAN CORTEZ - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 101.00 808443 0110 Christopher S Bowles 11/26/2025 $ 246.90
808444 0140 CITIGUARD INC 11/26/2025 $ 51,552.00
808445 0110 CLARISSE JOHNSON - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86 808446 4410 CLARK PEST CONTROL INC 11/26/2025 $ 90.00
808447 0110 CLEO BLACKBURN - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808448 1860 COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN 11/26/2025 $ 212,480.84 808449 0110 CONNIE HUDDLESTON - RETIREE 11/26/2025 $ 42.50 808450 0110 CONTRABAND CONTROL SPECIALISTS INC 11/26/2025 $ 572.50 808451 4120 COOPERS PETROLEUM DISTRIBUTOR INC 11/26/2025 $ 5,878.49 808452 0110 CREATIVE FINANCIAL STAFFING LLC 11/26/2025 $ 4,194.75 808453 4120 CRIDER CONSTRUCTION INC 11/26/2025 $ 119,161.18 808454 4120 CS AMSCO 11/26/2025 $ 10,944.69
808455 0110 CSI EXTERMINATORS INC 11/26/2025 $ 430.00
808456 5110 CUMMINS SALES AND SERVICE 11/26/2025 $ 4,313.18 808457 5110 CUTTING EDGE SUPPLY INC 11/26/2025 $ 2,520.06 808458 0110 DAN KULLRICH - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808459 0110 Daniel C Champness 11/26/2025 $ 299.00
808460 1810 Daniel D Mcclive 11/26/2025 $ 385.00
808461 0110 Danielle B Mabon 11/26/2025 $ 236.42
808462 0110 DAVES ALL N ONE CLEANING/HAULING SERVIC 11/26/2025 $ 499.00 808463 0110 DAVID JUDSON - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808464 0110 DAVID OJEDA - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808465 0120 DAVID SALVATIERRA - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 500.00 808466 4410 DEE JASPAR & ASSOCIATES INC 11/26/2025 $ 12,867.13 808467 0110 DELL MARKETING L P 11/26/2025 $ 76.85
808468 0110 DENNIS FIDLER - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 12.21
808469 0110 DENNIS HALL - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808470 0110 DESOTO SALES INC 11/26/2025 $ 244.30
808471 0110 DEWEY PEST CONTROL INC 11/26/2025 $ 528.00
808472 0110 DIAMOND H HAULING 11/26/2025 $ 499.00
808473 0110 DL BROWN CONSTRUCTION INC 11/26/2025 $ 3,960.00 808474 0110 DON ESTRADA - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808475 0110 DONALD TEUTIMEZ - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50 808476 0110 DREW SHARPLES - PART B 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808477 4310 DUANE MORRIS LLP 11/26/2025 $ 124,193.20
808478 0140 DUMMIES UNLIMITED INC 11/26/2025 $ 4,300.08 808479 0110 DWAYNE LEVINGSTON - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50 808481 0110 EMILIO TARANGO - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 14
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808482 0110 EMMA ROBERTS - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808483 0110 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 11/26/2025 $ 130.45
808484 5110 FAST UNDERCAR LLC 11/26/2025 $ 770.26
808485 0140 FEDEX 11/26/2025 $ 71.37
808486 0110 Felipe E Juarez 11/26/2025 $ 299.00
808487 0140 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY 11/26/2025 $ 1,364.00 808488 0110 FISH ENTERPISES INC 11/26/2025 $ 2,187.13
808489 5110 FLEET PRIDE INC 11/26/2025 $ 688.46
808490 0140 FLOOD BAKERSFIELD MINISTRIES 11/26/2025 $ 49,334.50 808491 0110 FRANK LOPEZ - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808492 0110 FRANK R HERRERA - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86 808493 0110 GARDENERS SUPPLY INC 11/26/2025 $ 151.55
808494 0110 Gary G Hallen 11/26/2025 $ 80.17
808495 0110 GEORGE GILLBURG - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86 808496 5110 GIBBS INTERNATIONAL TRUCK CENTER 11/26/2025 $ 1,676.32 808497 5110 GOLDEN EMPIRE TOWING INC 11/26/2025 $ 308.75 808498 6110 GOLDEN EMPIRE YOUTH FOOTBALL 11/26/2025 $ 5,860.00 808499 0110 GRACE MORIN - PART B 11/26/2025 $ 33.56
808500 0140 GRAPHIC SOLUTIONS LTD 11/26/2025 $ 4,240.00 808501 0110 GUADALUPE TINOCO - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86 808502 0120 Gustavo Galarza 11/26/2025 $ 105.00
808503 5110 H & S BODY WORKS & TOWING 11/26/2025 $ 50.00 808504 4310 H & S HOSE & SUPPLY INC 11/26/2025 $ 60.56
808505 4120 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 11/26/2025 $ 2,310.63 808506 5110 HADDAD DODGE 11/26/2025 $ 851.66
808507 4210 HALL LETTER SHOP 11/26/2025 $ 642.25
808508 0110 HENRY SHIPES - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808509 5110 HERITAGE CRYSTAL CLEAN LLC 11/26/2025 $ 1,677.61 808510 0110 HOME DEPOT PRO 11/26/2025 $ 2,459.27
808511 0110 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF KERN COUNTY 11/26/2025 $ 42,310.27 808512 5110 HYSTER COMPANY 11/26/2025 $ 70,311.09
808513 0110 ICF JONES & STOKES INC 11/26/2025 $ 1,150.00 808514 0120 IMPACT SCIENCES 11/26/2025 $ 30,271.80
808515 1910 INFLUENCERS YOUTH SPORTS 11/26/2025 $ 16,000.00 808516 0120 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 11/26/2025 $ 1,317.50 808517 0110 IRMA CARSON - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808518 0110 ISAAC O MONSIBAIS - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 1.80 808519 0110 ISABEL WILLIAMS - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86 808520 0110 Jacob C Heinsohn 11/26/2025 $ 299.00
808521 1810 Jacob K Thalin 11/26/2025 $ 471.00
808522 0110 Jaime A Velazquez 11/26/2025 $ 299.00
808523 0110 JAKE CADENA - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808524 5110 JERRY & KEITHS INC 11/26/2025 $ 1,030.45
808525 0110 JERRY DE LAURIE - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 12.21 808527 5110 JIM BURKE LINCOLN MERCURY 11/26/2025 $ 21,579.70 808528 5110 JIMS TOWING INC 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808529 1810 John B Bishop 11/26/2025 $ 471.00
808530 0110 JOHN LEON - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808531 0110 JOHN P HOWLETT - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808532 0110 JOHNSON CONTROLS SECURITY SOLUTIONS 11/26/2025 $ 1,273.64 808533 0110 Jonathan E Van Dyke 11/26/2025 $ 503.00
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 15
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808534 4210 JORGENSEN & CO 11/26/2025 $ 4,539.13
808536 0110 Joshua A Martinusen 11/26/2025 $ 1,668.00
808537 3120 JTS CONSTRUCTION INC 11/26/2025 $ 647,543.75 808540 0110 JULENE EMBREY - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808541 0110 Julie Drimakis 11/26/2025 $ 1,364.90
808542 1810 JULIE PARKER COMMUNICATIONS 11/26/2025 $ 1,375.00 808543 4210 K & I SERVICES INC 11/26/2025 $ 13,254.00
808544 6110 KAISER PERMANENTE 11/26/2025 $ 32,569.60
808545 0120 Karen A Bedolla 11/26/2025 $ 102.90
808546 0110 KAREN CRAWFORD - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808547 0110 KAREN KISBEY - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 12.21
808549 1510 KERN ASPHALT PAVING & SEALING 11/26/2025 $ 97,635.20 808550 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808551 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808552 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808553 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808554 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808555 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808556 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808557 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808558 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808559 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808560 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808561 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808562 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808563 0110 KERN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES DEPA 11/26/2025 $ 813.00 808564 4210 KERN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 11/26/2025 $ 305,573.09 808565 4210 KERN COUNTY WASTE MANAGEMENT 11/26/2025 $ 166,930.82 808566 4120 KERN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTORS 11/26/2025 $ 3,939.35 808567 5110 KERN MACHINERY INC 11/26/2025 $ 932.92
808568 0110 KERN PRINT SERVICES INC 11/26/2025 $ 285.78 808569 1450 KILLIAN PEST CONTROL 11/26/2025 $ 595.00
808570 4210 KNIGHTS SITE SERVICES INC 11/26/2025 $ 549.33 808571 0110 KROLL SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION LLC 11/26/2025 $ 579.06 808572 0110 LARRY STURTEVANT - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 12.21 808573 0110 LAUREN DIMBERG - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 39.61
808574 0110 LEROY ZINK - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808575 0110 LINDA ALONSO - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808576 6110 LONI O'DONLEY 11/26/2025 $ 42.90
808577 4210 LOS DOS HERMANOS TRASH CREW LLC 11/26/2025 $ 2,030.00 808579 0140 Luis Baez Cervantez 11/26/2025 $ 83.20
808580 0110 M ROSE OWEN - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808581 0110 Malachi M Payne 11/26/2025 $ 135.00
808582 5110 MAR-CO EQUIPMENT CORP 11/26/2025 $ 822.53
808583 1810 Marcela Haskins 11/26/2025 $ 349.00
808584 0110 MARGARET URSIN - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808585 0110 MARK W AUSTIN - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808587 0110 MARY ANNE MCLAY - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50 808588 0110 MEDIWASTE DISPOSAL LLC 11/26/2025 $ 177.45
808589 0110 Megan G Clough 11/26/2025 $ 47.96
808591 4210 METROPOLITAN RECYCLING LLC 11/26/2025 $ 31,353.04 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 16
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808592 4310 MEYER CIVIL ENGINEERING INC 11/26/2025 $ 7,005.80 808593 0110 MICHAEL F QUON - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808594 5110 MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA INC 11/26/2025 $ 6,514.58 808595 0110 MICKEY D MOYER - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808596 0110 MIKE DORKIN - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808597 0110 MIKE DOYLE - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
808598 4410 MISSION BANK 11/26/2025 $ 1,667.50
808599 0140 MJS SOLUTIONS LLC 11/26/2025 $ 1,770.00
808600 3120 MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN INC 11/26/2025 $ 4,245.75 808601 4120 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC 11/26/2025 $ 6,161.42 808602 5110 MOTOR CITY SALES & SERVICE 11/26/2025 $ 1,469.82 808603 0110 MOUNTAIN TEK 11/26/2025 $ 847.20
808605 0110 NANCY CHAFFIN-JOY 11/26/2025 $ 75.00
808606 0110 NEUTERING NOMAD INC 11/26/2025 $ 580.00
808607 4410 NICHOLAS CONSTRUCTION INC 11/26/2025 $ 1,855,034.48 808608 0110 O'CONNOR PEST CONTROL 11/26/2025 $ 785.00
808609 5110 OFFICE1 11/26/2025 $ 556.60
808610 5110 ONE SOURCE PARTS LLC 11/26/2025 $ 6,193.94
808611 6310 P & A ADMINISTRATION SERVICES INC 11/26/2025 $ 15,697.04 808612 4310 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES LLC 11/26/2025 $ 738.00 808613 5110 PAPE KENWORTH 11/26/2025 $ 139.06
808614 5110 PAPE MATERIAL HANDLING 11/26/2025 $ 3,819.10 808615 0110 PATRICIA DARBEE - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86 808616 0110 Paula J Rubio 11/26/2025 $ 86.00
808617 0110 PAULA ROMINES - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808618 3110 PAVEMENT RECYCLING SYSTEMS INC 11/26/2025 $ 45,543.99 808619 5110 PAYLESS TOWING 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808620 0110 PAYMENTUS 11/26/2025 $ 141.55
808621 0110 POLLARDWATER 11/26/2025 $ 925.17
808622 4120 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO INC 11/26/2025 $ 286.21 808623 0110 PRESTON GEORGE - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808625 0110 PRIMO BRANDS 11/26/2025 $ 43.80
808626 4610 PRO CLEANER UPPERS 11/26/2025 $ 1,000.00
808627 0110 PROFORMA SOLUTIONS FOR PRINTING 11/26/2025 $ 833.32 808628 0110 PROPIO LS LLC 11/26/2025 $ 541.02
808629 4310 PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING INC 11/26/2025 $ 5,429.00 808630 4310 QK 11/26/2025 $ 4,522.50
808631 0110 QOVO SOLUTIONS INC 11/26/2025 $ 510.31
808632 0110 RANCHO TREE SERVICE 11/26/2025 $ 27,714.32
808635 0140 RAYMONDS TROPHY AND AWARDS. INC. 11/26/2025 $ 498.49 808636 0110 READY REFRESH 11/26/2025 $ 173.48
808637 6110 REGINA SHELTON DBA 2 QUEENS FITNESS 11/26/2025 $ 78.00 808638 4210 REIMERS WHOLESALE NURSERY 11/26/2025 $ 364.97 808639 5110 RENEWELL FLEET SERVICE LLC 11/26/2025 $ 227.37 808640 5110 RESOURCE MACHINERY & ENGINEERING 11/26/2025 $ 8,332.17 808642 0110 RICHARD WATKINS - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86 808643 5110 RICHARDS CRANE SERVICE LLC 11/26/2025 $ 1,250.00 808645 0110 ROBERT D MELTON - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 12.21 808646 0110 ROBERT TABLIT - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 12.21
808647 0110 RODNEY KNIGHT - RETIREE 11/26/2025 $ 9.36
808648 0110 RONALD SHORT - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 17
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808649 1810 Ryan E Ryder 11/26/2025 $ 385.00
808650 0110 Ryan K Kroeker 11/26/2025 $ 299.00
808651 0110 Ryan P Clark 11/26/2025 $ 299.00
808652 0140 Ryan W Doolan 11/26/2025 $ 83.20
808653 0110 SAFETY NETWORKS TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE 11/26/2025 $ 1,080.00 808654 1510 SAFEWAY SIGN 11/26/2025 $ 1,802.36
808655 0110 Samantha N Lee 11/26/2025 $ 127.00
808656 5110 SAN JOAQUIN TIRES & WHEELS 11/26/2025 $ 179.90 808657 5110 SAN JOAQUIN TRACTOR CO INC 11/26/2025 $ 619.45 808658 0110 SCP DISTRIBUTORS LLC 11/26/2025 $ 1,966.84
808660 0110 Sean S Loya 11/26/2025 $ 204.00
808661 0110 SEHI COMPUTER PRODUCTS INC 11/26/2025 $ 4,569.24 808662 3120 SENDER CONSTRUCTION LLC 11/26/2025 $ 18,725.00 808663 0110 SEQUOIA PAINT ENTERPRISE 11/26/2025 $ 319.45 808664 0140 SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY 11/26/2025 $ 56.91 808665 0110 SHIRLEY A PHILLIPS - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 42.50 808666 0110 SHIRLEY TORRES - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86
808667 4120 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 11/26/2025 $ 2,045.93
808668 0110 SJVAPCD 11/26/2025 $ 94.00
808669 0110 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 11/26/2025 $ 407.05 808670 5110 SMITH & SON TIRE INC 11/26/2025 $ 1,342.49
808671 0140 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 11/26/2025 $ 4,462.82 808672 0110 SPARTAN INC 11/26/2025 $ 1,569.63
808673 5110 SPARTAN TRUCK CO INC 11/26/2025 $ 359.40
808674 5110 SPECIALTY TRIM & AWNING INC 11/26/2025 $ 703.63 808675 1910 SPORTS EVENT & TOURISM ASSOCIATION 11/26/2025 $ 1,195.00 808676 0110 STANDARD PLUMBING SUPPLY DBA FLOYDS 11/26/2025 $ 14.06 808677 1810 Steven A Mayberry 11/26/2025 $ 385.00
808678 6110 STOCKDALE HIGH SCHOOL - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 500.00 808679 0140 STOP RESTORATION BAKERSFIELD 11/26/2025 $ 15,000.00 808680 0140 SUMMIT STRATEGIES GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS LL 11/26/2025 $ 7,211.34 808681 4310 SUNSHINE CLEANING SERVICES 11/26/2025 $ 950.00 808682 0110 SUSAN ALEXANDER - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86 808683 0110 SUSAN CARROLL - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.53
808684 0120 Tamra L Lopez 11/26/2025 $ 113.40
808685 0110 TC WELDING & FABRICATION INC 11/26/2025 $ 5,850.00 808686 5110 TEN EIGHT TOW INC 11/26/2025 $ 50.00
808688 0110 THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK 11/26/2025 $ 160,342.43 808689 0110 TONY M ALVIDREZ - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 25.86 808690 0110 TOTAL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 11/26/2025 $ 950.00 808691 4510 TRANS-WEST SECURITY INC 11/26/2025 $ 23,964.95 808692 0110 TRUDY SLATER - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 7.85
808693 0110 TURF STAR INC - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 141.53
808694 5110 TYACK TIRES INC 11/26/2025 $ 172.50
808695 0110 Tyler J Schleicher 11/26/2025 $ 299.00
808696 0110 U.S. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PLAN 11/26/2025 $ 1,549.80 808697 5110 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY 11/26/2025 $ 981.76
808698 4410 UNIFIED FIELD SERVICES CORPORATION 11/26/2025 $ 31,682.50 808699 6110 UNITED CONCORDIA DENTAL PLANS OF CA 11/26/2025 $ 4,440.82 808700 4120 USP TECHNOLOGIES 11/26/2025 $ 18,923.47
808701 1450 V3 COMPANIES LTD 11/26/2025 $ 4,006.60
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 18
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808702 0110 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC 11/26/2025 $ 747.91 808703 0140 VALLEY PRESSURE PROS INC 11/26/2025 $ 11,350.00 808704 0110 VERITEXT 11/26/2025 $ 2,020.00
808705 4510 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/26/2025 $ 51,879.01
808706 0110 VESTIS SERVICES LLC 11/26/2025 $ 1,025.59
808707 0110 VICTORIA DAVIS - REFUND 11/26/2025 $ 12.39
808708 1910 WESTSIDE BULLETS SOFTBALL CLUB 11/26/2025 $ 1,500.00 808709 0140 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 11/26/2025 $ 550.69 808710 5110 WILCOX SUPPLY INC 11/26/2025 $ 164.64
808711 4410 WITCHER ELECTRIC INC 11/26/2025 $ 23,322.80 808712 5110 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 11/26/2025 $ 175.51 808713 5110 ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC. 11/26/2025 $ 20.17 808714 0110 ACC BUSINESS 12/4/2025 $ 1,550.49
808715 6780 BLX GROUP LLC 12/4/2025 $ 8,500.00
808718 4120 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 12/4/2025 $ 19,913.24 808719 0110 CEN-CAL CONSTRUCTION INC 12/4/2025 $ 37,184.60 808720 5110 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 12/4/2025 $ 3,131.23
808721 3120 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 12/4/2025 $ 11,437.20
808722 0110 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 12/4/2025 $ 98.00
808723 4410 DUANE MORRIS LLP 12/4/2025 $ 54.85
808724 1510 GREEN GRASS LAWN CARE 12/4/2025 $ 350.00
808726 4410 KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY 12/4/2025 $ 33,206.19 808727 6110 LESA GALA-REFUND 12/4/2025 $ 169.00
808732 4410 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 12/4/2025 $ 298,243.61 808733 4110 SJVAPCD 12/4/2025 $ 8,636.65
808734 0110 SOCALGAS 12/4/2025 $ 129.30
808735 0110 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 12/4/2025 $ 682.26 808737 5110 ADVANCED DISTRIBUTION CO 12/4/2025 $ 10,992.14 808740 0110 BAKER SUPPLIES AND REPAIRS 12/4/2025 $ 9,967.91 808742 0110 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS IN 12/4/2025 $ 14,166.85 808744 4210 GRAINGER INC, W W 12/4/2025 $ 4,722.63
808747 4310 HOME DEPOT 12/4/2025 $ 3,352.43
808749 5110 MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA INC 12/4/2025 $ 13,693.31 808751 5110 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 12/4/2025 $ 1,392.14
808753 5110 SILVAS OIL CO INC 12/4/2025 $ 35,949.11
808755 0110 STINSON STATIONERS 12/4/2025 $ 8,090.44
808757 3120 TEL TEC SECURITY SYSTEM INC 12/4/2025 $ 21,078.09 808760 5110 TYACK TIRES INC 12/4/2025 $ 16,900.47
808772 4410 UNIFIED FIELD SERVICES CORPORATION 12/4/2025 $ 257,720.82 808777 1510 VESTIS SERVICES LLC 12/4/2025 $ 6,239.20
808778 0110 A T & T 12/4/2025 $ 300.00
808779 0110 A T & T 12/4/2025 $ 330.01
808780 5110 A-1 24TH ST SMOG 12/4/2025 $ 180.00
808781 4120 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC 12/4/2025 $ 220,077.72 808782 0110 AEG MANAGEMENT BAKERSFIELD LLC 12/4/2025 $ 3,400.00 808783 5110 AEP CALIFORNIA LLC 12/4/2025 $ 96,012.63
808784 1860 AEROSPACE VALLEY FUTURES, INC. 12/4/2025 $ 17,166.33 808786 0110 ALL AMERICAN GLASS 12/4/2025 $ 593.59
808787 5110 ALUMINUM CHUCK WAGON 12/4/2025 $ 1,025.61
808788 1110 Alyssa Olivera 12/4/2025 $ 105.00
808789 1110 AMERINATIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC 12/4/2025 $ 765.00 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 19
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808790 5110 APPLIED LNG TECHNOLOGIES LLC 12/4/2025 $ 10,873.93 808791 0140 ARTISTIC SURFACES INC 12/4/2025 $ 12,681.00 808792 0110 AUTO TINT WEST INC 12/4/2025 $ 359.60
808793 5110 AUTOZONE STORES INC 12/4/2025 $ 949.54
808794 0110 B & B SURPLUS 12/4/2025 $ 137.26
808795 0110 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN 12/4/2025 $ 546.70
808796 5110 BAKERSFIELD CHRYSLER-JEEP 12/4/2025 $ 332.00 808797 5110 BAKERSFIELD HARLEY DAVIDSON INC 12/4/2025 $ 2,898.01 808798 0110 BAKERSFIELD IRRIGATION 12/4/2025 $ 9,316.35 808799 5110 BARNETT'S TOWING SERVICE INC 12/4/2025 $ 150.00 808800 0110 BEADOR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC 12/4/2025 $ 77,748.44 808801 0110 BEAR CLOUD 12/4/2025 $ 5,572.04
808802 5110 BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO 12/4/2025 $ 784.17
808803 0110 Bijan B Gharib 12/4/2025 $ 148.47
808804 5110 BLACKHOLE TECHNOLOGIES INC 12/4/2025 $ 4,302.31 808805 5110 BOBS WHOLESALE AUTO GLASS 12/4/2025 $ 996.63 808806 5110 BORN AGAIN BODYWORKS 12/4/2025 $ 20,778.82
808807 4210 BOWMAN ASPHALT 12/4/2025 $ 45,300.00
808808 0110 BRADY INDUSTRIES 12/4/2025 $ 1,573.60
808809 4120 BSK ASSOCIATES 12/4/2025 $ 790.00
808810 5110 BUDGET BOLT INC 12/4/2025 $ 460.39
808811 0110 BUILDING ELECTRONIC CONTROLS INC 12/4/2025 $ 825.00 808812 5110 CAL VALLEY EQUIPMENT INC 12/4/2025 $ 505.03 808813 5110 CALIFORNIA FUELS & LUBRICANTS 12/4/2025 $ 65,009.44 808814 0140 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP INC 12/4/2025 $ 13,500.00 808815 5110 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA POWER INC 12/4/2025 $ 782.05 808816 0110 CHAMINDA DISSANAYAKE 12/4/2025 $ 400.00
808817 3120 CHAMPION HARDWARE 12/4/2025 $ 156.23
808818 0110 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 12/4/2025 $ 69.01
808819 5110 CHESTER AVENUE BRAKE & SUPPLY 12/4/2025 $ 574.68 808820 0110 Chris Borden 12/4/2025 $ 140.00
808821 5110 CLAWSON AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT & SERVICE 12/4/2025 $ 69,947.44 808822 5110 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT 12/4/2025 $ 2,212.14
808823 4120 COMPLETE PAPERLESS SOLUTIONS 12/4/2025 $ 2,125.84 808824 0110 CREATIVE FINANCIAL STAFFING LLC 12/4/2025 $ 2,380.00 808825 5110 CUMMINS SALES AND SERVICE 12/4/2025 $ 4,082.71 808826 0110 Daniel L Brewer 12/4/2025 $ 48.13
808827 0110 Danielle B Mabon 12/4/2025 $ 43.89
808828 5110 DELL MARKETING L P 12/4/2025 $ 1,045.02
808829 3210 DL BROWN CONSTRUCTION INC 12/4/2025 $ 5,280.00 808830 5110 E J WARD INCORPORATED 12/4/2025 $ 2,001.02
808831 0110 EAN SERVICES LLC 12/4/2025 $ 9,179.69
808832 5110 ELBERT DISTRIBUTING 12/4/2025 $ 85.99
808834 0140 EMTS INC 12/4/2025 $ 350.00
808836 0110 ERNEST PACKING SOLUTIONS INC 12/4/2025 $ 4,897.36 808837 0110 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 12/4/2025 $ 1,316.18 808838 5110 FAST UNDERCAR LLC 12/4/2025 $ 339.88
808839 4410 FEDEX 12/4/2025 $ 221.38
808840 0110 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 12/4/2025 $ 130.26 808841 0110 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES INC 12/4/2025 $ 376.29 808842 0110 FORVIS MAZARS LLP 12/4/2025 $ 6,000.00
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 20
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808843 5110 FRED CUMMINGS MOTORSPORTS INC 12/4/2025 $ 13.80 808844 4410 FRUIT GROWERS LABORATORY INC 12/4/2025 $ 603.00 808845 4110 G S E CONSTRUCTION CO INC 12/4/2025 $ 296,966.20 808846 1810 GALLS LLC 12/4/2025 $ 255.47
808847 5110 GIBBS INTERNATIONAL TRUCK CENTER 12/4/2025 $ 59.36 808848 5110 GOLDEN EMPIRE TOWING INC 12/4/2025 $ 2,168.00 808849 5110 GOLDEN STATE PETERBILT 12/4/2025 $ 19,199.81 808850 1210 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC 12/4/2025 $ 1,397,628.82 808851 5110 GREGS PETROLEUM SERVICES INC 12/4/2025 $ 1,028.06 808852 5110 H & S BODY WORKS & TOWING 12/4/2025 $ 122.00 808853 5110 HADDAD DODGE 12/4/2025 $ 933.19
808854 0110 HALL LETTER SHOP 12/4/2025 $ 152.35
808855 0110 HARDER + COMPANY COMMUNITY RESEARCH 12/4/2025 $ 1,600.00 808856 4210 HDR ENGINEERING INC 12/4/2025 $ 3,094.17
808857 4110 HF & H CONSULTANTS LLC 12/4/2025 $ 52,704.90 808858 0110 HLP, INC 12/4/2025 $ 21.00
808859 5110 HLP, INC 12/4/2025 $ 3,840.00
808860 0110 HPS MECHANICAL INC 12/4/2025 $ 221,888.27
808861 5110 HYDRAULIC CONTROLS INC 12/4/2025 $ 324.80
808862 5110 JAB COMMUNICATIONS INC 12/4/2025 $ 658.36
808863 5110 JERRY & KEITHS INC 12/4/2025 $ 644.13
808864 0140 Jessica N Golden 12/4/2025 $ 105.00
808865 5110 JIM BURKE FORD 12/4/2025 $ 4,314.99
808866 5110 JIM BURKE FORD-EQ 12/4/2025 $ 55,286.97
808867 5110 JIM BURKE LINCOLN MERCURY 12/4/2025 $ 17,600.77 808868 5110 JIMS TOWING INC 12/4/2025 $ 300.00
808869 5110 JM PRECISION GOLF CART INC 12/4/2025 $ 1,307.65 808870 4210 JORGENSEN & CO 12/4/2025 $ 285.43
808871 0110 JOSES ORNAMENTAL SUPPLY INC 12/4/2025 $ 598.62 808872 0110 Joshua C Pena 12/4/2025 $ 148.61
808873 5110 K & R TOWING 12/4/2025 $ 50.00
808874 0110 Katie E Cox 12/4/2025 $ 162.75
808875 0110 Keith R Shelton 12/4/2025 $ 202.30
808876 5110 KELLAR EQUIPMENT HOSE AND REPAIR INC 12/4/2025 $ 9,660.44 808877 1910 Kelly Kathleen Sloan 12/4/2025 $ 318.00
808878 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 12/4/2025 $ 3,018.75
808879 5110 KERN COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS 12/4/2025 $ 41,315.93 808880 5110 KERN MACHINERY INC 12/4/2025 $ 897.72
808881 0110 KERN TURF SUPPLY 12/4/2025 $ 1,123.58
808882 5110 LEAVITT COMMUNICATIONS LLC 12/4/2025 $ 16,143.32 808883 0110 Leslie Alvarez 12/4/2025 $ 229.32
808884 1510 LINDE GAS & EQUIPMENT DBA PRAXAIR 12/4/2025 $ 251.60 808885 4210 LOS DOS HERMANOS TRASH CREW LLC 12/4/2025 $ 3,065.00 808886 4120 LOWES HOME IMPROVEMENT 12/4/2025 $ 1,211.84 808887 0110 Luis A Topete 12/4/2025 $ 299.40
808888 5110 MAGNET FORENSICS 12/4/2025 $ 57,110.00
808889 5110 MAR-CO EQUIPMENT CORP 12/4/2025 $ 236.15
808890 6110 MARIA MAGDELENA JAYNE 12/4/2025 $ 3,662.00
808891 1910 Matthew W Billingsley 12/4/2025 $ 418.00
808892 0110 MEMORIAL OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE 12/4/2025 $ 3,963.00 808893 4210 METROPOLITAN RECYCLING LLC 12/4/2025 $ 72,089.24 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 21
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808894 4110 MEYER CIVIL ENGINEERING INC 12/4/2025 $ 19,777.00 808895 0110 MINUTEMAN PRESS 12/4/2025 $ 402.02
808896 0140 MJS SOLUTIONS LLC 12/4/2025 $ 250.00
808897 3120 MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN INC 12/4/2025 $ 3,612.50 808898 5110 MOTOR CITY SALES & SERVICE 12/4/2025 $ 63,418.61 808899 0110 MOUNTAIN TEK 12/4/2025 $ 1,277.70
808900 5110 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIP INC 12/4/2025 $ 407.81 808901 0110 NEUTERING NOMAD INC 12/4/2025 $ 520.00
808902 0110 NISHIKAWA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE INC 12/4/2025 $ 7,492.80 808903 0110 NORTH KERN WATER STORAGE DISTRICT 12/4/2025 $ 466.19 808904 4310 NV5 INC 12/4/2025 $ 84,120.24
808905 5110 OFFICE1 12/4/2025 $ 309.39
808906 5110 ONE SOURCE PARTS LLC 12/4/2025 $ 1,630.59
808907 4110 OVIVO USA LLC 12/4/2025 $ 9,602.73
808908 5110 PAPE KENWORTH 12/4/2025 $ 57.12
808909 5110 PAYLESS TOWING 12/4/2025 $ 50.00
808910 0110 PIONEER PAINT 12/4/2025 $ 7,315.18
808911 4210 PREMIER VALLEY TRANSPORT INC 12/4/2025 $ 11,280.00 808912 4610 PRO CLEANER UPPERS 12/4/2025 $ 1,000.00
808913 4210 PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING INC 12/4/2025 $ 562.50 808914 5110 QCS QUICK CUSTOM SIGNS 12/4/2025 $ 399.38
808915 4310 QK 12/4/2025 $ 2,176.36
808916 5110 QUINN COMPANY INC 12/4/2025 $ 4,256.66
808917 0140 RESCUE DIRECT 12/4/2025 $ 3,009.84
808918 4210 RLH FIRE PROTECTION 12/4/2025 $ 203.00
808919 4120 ROCKWELL ENGINEERING 12/4/2025 $ 3,812.01
808920 5110 SAN JOAQUIN FENCE & SUPPLY 12/4/2025 $ 6,237.00 808921 5110 SAN JOAQUIN TIRES & WHEELS 12/4/2025 $ 1,997.71 808922 0110 Sean P Reis 12/4/2025 $ 160.00
808923 4310 SIERRA HYDROGRAPHICS 12/4/2025 $ 32,505.79
808924 0110 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 12/4/2025 $ 255.23 808925 5110 SMITH & SON TIRE INC 12/4/2025 $ 1,802.29
808926 5110 SNIDER'S INC 12/4/2025 $ 23.82
808927 4410 SOUTH VALLEY COMPANIES INC 12/4/2025 $ 625.00 808928 3120 STANDARD PLUMBING SUPPLY DBA FLOYDS 12/4/2025 $ 157.61 808929 4210 STARS AND STRIPES 12/4/2025 $ 3,200.00
808930 5110 SUBURBAN PROPANE 12/4/2025 $ 179.08
808931 0140 SUMMIT STRATEGIES GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS LL 12/4/2025 $ 6,500.00 808932 0110 T-MOBILE USA 12/4/2025 $ 380.00
808933 4410 TEST GAUGE INC 12/4/2025 $ 45,093.50
808934 5110 THE DRALA PROJECT INC 12/4/2025 $ 10,079.62 808935 0110 Timothy R Guenther 12/4/2025 $ 160.00
808936 0110 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 12/4/2025 $ 2,787.29
808937 0110 TRANS-WEST SECURITY INC 12/4/2025 $ 5,603.29 808938 0110 Trayce M Sparling 12/4/2025 $ 120.00
808939 5110 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY 12/4/2025 $ 1,662.02
808940 3310 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 12/4/2025 $ 539.63 808941 1910 US TRAVEL ASSOCIATION 12/4/2025 $ 2,775.00
808942 0140 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/4/2025 $ 4,407.57
808943 4310 WESTAIR GASES & EQUIPMENT INC 12/4/2025 $ 68.20 808944 0140 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 12/4/2025 $ 87.81 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 22
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808945 5110 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 12/4/2025 $ 3,679.08 808946 5110 ZERONOX 12/4/2025 $ 112.43
808947 5110 ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC. 12/4/2025 $ 15.02 9998499 0110 CARD CHAMP 11/13/2025 $ 15.00
9998500 5110 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 11/13/2025 $ 206.67 9998501 4610 U S BANK 11/13/2025 $ 4,385.54
9998502 0110 VERMONT SYSTEMS 11/13/2025 $ 790.74
9998504 4210 U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 11/20/2025 $ 4,118,347.60 9998506 5110 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 11/26/2025 $ 44.45 9998507 0140 DP CAL CORPORATE PLAZA LP 11/26/2025 $ 68,387.63 807675 5210 CLIFFORD & BROWN 11/13/2025 $ 27,500.00
807682 5210 MARDEROSIAN & COHEN 11/13/2025 $ 140,000.00 807754 5210 AIMS 11/13/2025 $ 73,500.00
807755 5210 AIMS C/O FLOYD SKEREN MANUKIAN LANGEVIN 11/13/2025 $ 544.95 807756 5210 AIMS C/O HANNA BROPHY MACLEAN 11/13/2025 $ 1,051.00 807757 5210 AIMS C/O YRULEGUI & ROBERTS APC 11/13/2025 $ 1,103.07 807771 5210 Arturo Galvez 11/13/2025 $ 160.00
807831 5210 David U Momoa 11/13/2025 $ 136.39
807837 5210 Eduardo Arce 11/13/2025 $ 160.00
807849 5210 Federico P Aguilar 11/13/2025 $ 160.00
807863 5210 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY INC 11/13/2025 $ 22,765.14 807873 5210 HANNA BROPHY MACLEAN MCALEER & JENSEN L 11/13/2025 $ 845.83 807916 5210 Matthew J Cushnyr 11/13/2025 $ 160.00
807976 5210 STEPHANIE GARCIA 11/13/2025 $ 89.15
807985 5210 TREK DIGITAL PRODUCTS INC 11/13/2025 $ 699.83 808003 5210 Zachary L Maloney 11/13/2025 $ 149.23
808058 5210 LEHIGH OUTFITTERS LLC 11/20/2025 $ 1,437.49 808098 5210 Anthony Cortez 11/20/2025 $ 129.90
808118 5210 Braulio Escarcega 11/20/2025 $ 160.00
808125 5210 Carlos G Valdez 11/20/2025 $ 160.00
808160 5210 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY INC 11/20/2025 $ 621.87 808214 5210 MEMORIAL OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE 11/20/2025 $ 9,890.00 808252 5210 Robert E Enriquez 11/20/2025 $ 160.00
808253 5210 Rodney W Grounds 11/20/2025 $ 144.76
808355 5210 LEHIGH OUTFITTERS LLC 11/26/2025 $ 1,239.26 808385 5210 AIMS C/O HANNA BROPHY MACLEAN 11/26/2025 $ 14,020.50 808391 5210 Antonio Garza 11/26/2025 $ 160.00
808396 5210 Arturo Frias 11/26/2025 $ 160.00
808419 5210 Bricio B Deleon 11/26/2025 $ 160.00
808480 5210 Efrain Marquez 11/26/2025 $ 160.00
808526 5210 Jesus Estrada 11/26/2025 $ 160.00
808535 5210 Jose Pelayo 11/26/2025 $ 160.00
808538 5210 Juan D Mejia 11/26/2025 $ 155.87
808539 5210 Juan R Ambriz 11/26/2025 $ 136.38
808548 5210 Kent J Sloan 11/26/2025 $ 160.00
808578 5210 Luis A Aldaco 11/26/2025 $ 160.00
808586 5210 Marvin Pop 11/26/2025 $ 160.00
808590 5210 MEMORIAL OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE 11/26/2025 $ 8,034.00 808604 5210 NADINE YEARY 11/26/2025 $ 3,472.20
808624 5210 PRIME ACTUARIAL CONSULTING, LLC 11/26/2025 $ 9,600.00 808633 5210 Raul A Ortiz 11/26/2025 $ 160.00
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\ 12/5/2025 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 11/07/2025 TO 12/04/2025
PAGE 23
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
808634 5210 Ray Ramirez 11/26/2025 $ 160.00
808641 5210 Ricardo Leon 11/26/2025 $ 160.00
808644 5210 Robert B Pressley 11/26/2025 $ 137.37
808659 5210 Sean J Dye 11/26/2025 $ 160.00
808687 5210 TERI HARLESS 11/26/2025 $ 3,859.18
808716 5210 BURRIS NISENBAUM CURRY AND LACY LLP IN 12/4/2025 $ 800,000.00 808725 5210 JAY AND LORA MASSIE 12/4/2025 $ 15,000.00
808728 5210 MARC LUGO 12/4/2025 $ 25,000.00
808729 5210 MARDEROSIAN & COHEN 12/4/2025 $ 60,265.21
808785 5210 AIMS C/O HANNA BROPHY MACLEAN 12/4/2025 $ 2,545.50 808833 5210 Emily R Winther 12/4/2025 $ 151.54
808835 5210 Erik Figueroa 12/4/2025 $ 140.71
9998503 5210 WELLS FARGO BANK 11/13/2025 $ 177,854.57
9998505 5210 WELLS FARGO BANK 11/20/2025 $ 126,860.97
9998508 5210 WELLS FARGO BANK 11/26/2025 $ 126,057.82
9998509 5210 WELLS FARGO BANK 12/4/2025 $ 102,922.80
$ 35,207,303.99
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2025\COUNCIL - ADMIN\11.19.25\

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent – Payments and Agreements TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Randy McKeegan, Finance Director
DATE: December 5, 2025
SUBJECT: Receive and file department agreements over $40,000 and under $100,000 between November 7, 2025
and December 4, 2025.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends receiving and filing the report.

BACKGROUND:

In accordance with Bakersfield Municipal Code Chapter 3.20 the Finance Director must report other financial reports required to indicate the financial condition of the city periodically to the City Council. In conjunction with changes to Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 3.20, an informational report was requested to provide documentation of contracts between $40,000 and $100,000 to increase transparency and measure the effectiveness of the changes in contract authority threshold amounts.

FISCAL IMPACT:
$1,196,761.36
COUNCIL GOAL:

Innovative and Efficient City Government
ATTACHMENTS:

Department Agreement Report 12.17.25
Document Number Name Subject Amount Date Miscellaneous Information WR25-046 GT Michelli Co LLC To provide truck scale calibration & certification services for the WW Division $43,000.00 11/26/2025
TS25-041
Transit Asset
Management DBA
Faster Asset Solutions
Provide annual FASTER web support $49,181.36 11/26/2025 PD25-032 Julie Parker Monthly communication services Crisis Support $65,000.00 11/12/2025 WR24-035(1) Alliance Technical
Group LLC
To provide monthly gas analysis and annual source testing for engines, boilers & flares for the WW Division $70,000.00 11/26/2025 CA25-013 Richards Watson
Gershon Legal Services $75,000.00 11/14/2025
2024-312(1) Bowman Infrastructure
Engineers LTD Preparation of an environmental impact report for GP $76,150.00 11/14/2025 WR25-044 HF&J Consultants Provided financial consulting services $78,430.00 11/3/2025 HR24-008(1) P&A Administrative
Services Inc.

Extending term one year & adding compensation to assist in meeting COBRA compliance responsibilities for employees $80,000.00 11/26/2025 HR24-009(1) P&A Administrative
Services Inc.

Extending term one year & adding compensation to provide administrative services w/respect to the cafeteria plan (section 125) of the IRS to eligible employees
$80,000.00 11/26/2025
HR24-010(1) P&A Administrative
Services Inc.

Extending term one year & adding compensation to assist in providing group health plans to certain retired employees $80,000.00 11/26/2025 CM25-055 Sellable Conduct review and support of the City's website and public facing content $100,000.00 11/13/2025
DS25-048 Interwest Consulting
Group Inc
On an as needed basis for building and safety plan check consultant services $100,000.00 11/7/2025
DS25-049 KURB CUT Perform all abate violation on each property described non the work order $100,000.00 11/7/2025
PW25-102 Building Electronic
Controls Inc
Provide all labor and equipment for annual inspections and maintenance on fire detection components $100,000.00 12/2/2025 RP25-069 Fastenal Company Inc Install, setup and maintain a FMIT Equipment locker at designated locations $100,000.00 11/21/2025
$1,196,761.36

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent - Ordinances TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Phillip Burns, Development Services Director
DATE: December 17, 2025
SUBJECT: First reading of Zone Change No. 25- 0001 and adoption of its proposed mitigated negative declaration.

McIntosh & Associates, representing Camino Media Properties, LLC, is proposing a Zone Change on 11.22 acres generally located at 9700 Camino Media. The request includes:

1. Resolution adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Staff recommends approval of the resolution and first reading of the ordinance.

BACKGROUND:

The project is a request to change the zone classification from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-4 (High Density Multi-Unit Dwelling) on 11.22 acres located at 9700 Camino Media.

Project Summary
The proposed zone change from R-2/PUD to R-4 is intended to facilitate future development of a multiplefamily residential complex, where the proposed zone change would allow for up to 191 multi-family units.

However, staff notes that no site development plans have been submitted for formal review. A conceptual site has been provided.

If the zone change is successfully approved amending the zone from R-2 to R-4, the upzone would have an increase in residential density. Residential density for R-2 zoned parcels ranges between 6.1 to 13 dwelling units per net acre and the R-4 zone density range is between 20.1 to 30 dwelling units per net acre. For example, on the 11.22-acre parcel, 68 dwelling units would be allowed under the R-2 zoning and a maximum of 221 dwelling units under the R-4 zoning. The applicant submitted a conceptual site plan depicting 191 multi-family dwelling units. However, since no site development plans have been submitted for a formal review, the number of dwelling units will be determined at that time using net acreage.

Amending the zone from R-2/PUD to R-4 would also remove the Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay zone from the parcels. Removing the PUD overlay zone will streamline the permitting process by eliminating the discretionary review process that would be considered before the Planning Commission and replace with the ministerial site plan review process consistent with the newly adopted 6th Cycle Housing Element 2023-2031.

Site History
 March 10, 2022 - The Bakersfield City Council adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approves a change in land use designation from OC (Office Commercial ) to HMR (High Medium Density Residential) Resolutions 056-2022 and 057-2022).
 April 20, 2022 - The Bakersfield City Council approves zone change from C-O (professional and Administrative Office) to R-2/PUD (Limited Multiple Family Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) (Ordinance 5081).
 October 16, 2025 – The Bakersfield Planning Commission unanimously approved the mitigated negative declaration and zone from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-4 (High Density Multi-Unit Dwelling) (Res. Nos. 53-25 and 54-25).

Environmental Review and Determination
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Staff prepared an initial study to review the potential environmental impacts of the project. The Initial Study was based on project-specific analysis and technical studies: Air Quality Assessment; Biological Resources Study; Phase I Cultural Resource Survey; and Traffic study with Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis.

The Initial Study determined that compliance with recommended mitigation measures, local ordinances, state laws, and construction to the standards of the Uniform Building Codes will reduce impacts to a lessthan- significant level. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) was prepared for this project and was circulated for a 30-day public and agency review period from July 21, 2025, to August 21, 2025 (SCH No. 2025070683) in accordance with CEQA.

Comments Received. As of this writing, one comment was received in response to the Initial Study from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA’s) Department of Toxic Substances Control. However, the comment focused on best practices rather than opposing the project.

Public Notification
Public notice for the proposed project and environmental determination was advertised in The Bakersfield Californian and posted on the bulletin board in the City of Bakersfield Development Services Building, 1715 Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, California. All property owners within 300 feet ofthe project site were notified by United States Postal Service mail regarding the Planning Commission’s public hearing in accordance with city ordinance and state law. Additionally, a public hearing notice wasissued via email to all interested parties that submitted written comments.

Planning Commission Action
The project was considered by Planning Commission on October 16, 2025. The Commission unanimously approved the Mitigated Negative Declaration and voted to in favor of the zone change from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-4 (High Density MultiUnit Dwelling) and recommend the same to City Council. The Planning Commission’s findings are contained in Resolution Nos. 53-25 and 54-25.

CONCLUSIONS:

The proposal is consistent with land use goals and policies as contained in the General Plan. The project accommodates development that captures the economic demands of the marketplace, helps to provide a full mix of uses to support the population, compliments existing land uses, and allows for a variety of residential type uses. The project would provide for higher density residential development that includes on-site recreational amenities. It is the intent of this zone to provide a livable, walkable, and sustainable residential environment that ensures compatibility with surrounding lower-density single-unit and multiunit dwellings and neighborhood commerce.

The project has been found to be consistent with General Plan policies and City Zoning Ordinance requirements. Therefore, City staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve Zone Change No. 25-0001 and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Developer has paid fees associated with this action to change zoning and those fee’s mostly cover the cost of the services rendered. Therefore, no impact on the City General Fund.

COUNCIL GOAL:

Community Character & Quality of Life
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution adopting the mitigated negative declaration

2. Ordinance

3. Attachment A: Map Set
a. GPA/ZC Aerial
b. GPA/ZC Zone Classification
c. GPA/ZC General Plan Designation

4. Attachment B: Mitigated Negative Declaration with Attachments

5. Attachment C: Planning Commission Resolutions
a. Res No. 54-25: Adopt MND with Attachments
b. Res. No. 53-25: Approve ZC with Attachments

6. Attachment D: Planning Commission Staff Report

Page 1 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION NO. _____________

RESOLUTION OF THE BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 17 OF THE BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE TO CHANGE THE ZONE DISTRICT LOCATED AT 9700 CAMINO MEDIA, GENERALLY LOCATED

NORTH SIDE OF CAMINO MEDIA BETWEEN OLD RIVER ROAD AND
SOUTHWEST DRIVE (ZC NO. 25-0001).

WHEREAS, McIntosh & Associates (applicant), representing Camino Media Properties, LLC (property owner), is requesting an amendment to Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code to change the Zone District from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-4 (High Density Multi-Unit Dwelling) on 11.22 acres located at 9700 Camino Media, shown in attached Exhibit “B”, (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, it was determined that the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a public review period from July 21, 2025 to August 21, 2025, in accordance with CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 16, 2025 and accepted public testimony in support from the applicant, approved Resolution No. 54-25 which recommended that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk of the City Council set Wednesday, November 19, 2025 at 5:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place before the City Council to consider the proposed Amendment and Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by Government Code Section 65355 and notice of the public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and adoption of Mitigated Negative Declarations as set forth in CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Bakersfield CEQA Implementation Procedures have been duly followed by City staff and the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, during themeetiing, the City Council considered all facts, testimony, and evidence concerning the staff report, Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Planning Commission’s deliberation, and action.

Page 2 of 3 ends

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Bakersfield City Council as follows:

1. The above recitals, incorporated herein, are true and correct.

2. The Planning Commission's findings as contained in its Resolution No. 54-25 are hereby adopted.

3. The Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project is hereby adopted subject to the mitigation measures in Exhibit “A” for the Project located on the map as shown in Exhibit B, both of which are incorporated herein. ---------o0o--------

Page 3 of 3 ends

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted, by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on ______________________________ by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBER ARIAS, GONZALES, WEIR, SMITH, FREEMAN, GRAY, KAUR NOES: COUNCILMEMBER _______________________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER _______________________________________________________________ ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER ______________________________________________________________ _ ________________________________

JULIE DRIMAKIS, MMC
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of
the Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED: _________________
By __________________________

KAREN GOH
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

VIRGINIA GENNARO, CITY ATTORNEY
By: ____________________________

VIRIDIANA GALLARDO-KING
Deputy City Attorney II
Exhibits: A Mitigation Measures
B Location Map
By: YA\S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD To R-4\01_Hearing Documents & Noticing Documents\1st CC\03_CC Resolution - MND.Docx
EXHIBIT “A”

MITIGATION MEASURES FROM MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ZONE CHANGE NO. PP-ZC-25-0001
Air Quality Impact Mitigation Measures:

1. Prior to grading plan approval, the applicant/developer shall submit documentation to the Planning Division that they are compliant with air quality control measures and rules required by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. The documentation shall specify that the Project has complied with the SJVAPCD’s Indirect Source Rule (Rule 9510).

2. Prior to grading plan approval, the applicant/developer shall submit proof to the Planning Division that they have complied with the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District’s Indirect Source Rule (Rule 9510).

Biological Resources Impact Mitigation Measures:

3. Prior to ground disturbance and/or construction activities, the applicant/developer shall consult with and follow all California Department of Fish and Wildlife and United States Fish and Wildlife Service requirements related to listed plant and animal species protected under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). Applicant/developer shall have a qualified professional conduct and prepare a biological resource clearance survey no less than 14 days and no more than 30 days prior to the beginning of ground disturbance and/or construction activities for the detection of listed, or otherwise special-status species, likely to be impacted by any project related activity.
a) If known or natal dens are detected during the survey, protective measures enumerated in the USFWS Standardized Recommendations for Protection of Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance (2011) shall be initiated. If the identified dens are unavoidable, pursuant to the guidelines, the CDFW and USFWS shall be contacted for additional guidance and take authorization.
b) If Bakersfield cacti are identified during the survey, the CDFW shall be contacted for guidance concerning the feasibility of translocation.
c) The survey or separate survey shall include a focus on the burrowing owl. The survey shall follow the methodology developed by the California Burrowing Owl Consortium (CBOC 1993). The applicant/developer shall follow CDFW protocol for mitigation and comply with the provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

Geology and Soils, Cultural Resources, and Tribal Resources Impacts Mitigation Measures:

4. Prior to construction and as needed throughout the construction period, a cultural awareness training program shall be provided to all new construction workers within one week of employment at the project site. The training shall be prepared and conducted by a qualified cultural resources specialist.

5. During construction, if paleontological or cultural resources are encountered during construction or ground disturbance activities, all work within 50 feet of the find shall immediately cease and the area cordoned off until a qualified cultural and/or paleontological resource specialist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards can evaluate the find and make recommendations. If the specialist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant cultural resource, additional investigations may be required. These additional studies may include avoidance, testing, and excavation. All reports, correspondence, and determinations regarding the discovery shall be submitted to the California Historical Resources Information System’s Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center at California State University Bakersfield.

6. During construction, if human remains are discovered, further ground disturbance shall be prohibited pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. The specific protocol, guidelines, and channels of communication outlined by the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, Public Resources Code 5097.97, and Senate Bill 447 shall be followed. In the event of the discovery of human remains, at the direction of the county coroner, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c) shall guide Native American consultation.

Traffic Impact Mitigation Measures:

7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant/developer shall participate in the Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) program by paying the adopted fees in place for the land use type at time of development.

EXHIBIT B
YA/S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD To R-4\01_Hearing Documents & Noticing Documents\1st CC\CC ZC ORD\ZC 25-0001 _CC ZC Ordinance-Final Draft.Docx
ORDINANCE NO. ______

AN ORDINANCE OF THE BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 17 OF THE BAKERSFIELD

MUNICIPAL CODE TO CHANGE THE ZONE DISTRICT LOCATED AT
9700 CAMINO MEDIA, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH SIDE OF

CAMINO MEDIA BETWEEN OLD RIVER ROAD AND SOUTHWEST
DRIVE (ZC NO. 25-0001).

WHEREAS, McIntosh & Associates (applicant), representing Camino Media Properties, LLC (property owner), is requesting an amendment to Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code to change the Zone District from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-4 (High Density Multi-Unit Dwelling) on approximately 11.22 acres located at 9700 Camino Media, shown in attached Exhibit “A”, (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 16, 2025, and accepted public testimony in support from the applicant, approved Resolution No.54-25, which recommended that the City Council approve the Project; and WHEREAS, the Clerk of the City Council set Wednesday, December 17, 2025 at 5:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place before the City Council to consider the proposed Amendment and Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by Government Code Section 65355 and notice of the public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered all facts, testimony, and evidence concerning the Project, including the staff report, Negative Declaration and the Planning Commission’s deliberation, and action; and
WHEREAS, the Project is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan.

SECTION 1.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Bakersfield City Council as follows:

1. The above recitals, incorporated herein, are true and correct.

2. The Planning Commission's findings as contained in its Resolution No. 53-25 are hereby adopted.

3. The Project is subject to mitigation measures found in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project.

YA/S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD To R-4\01_Hearing Documents & Noticing Documents\1st CC\CC ZC ORD\ZC 25-0001 _CC ZC Ordinance-Final Draft.Docx

4. The Project is hereby approved incorporating the change into the official zoning map as described in Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 17.06.020 located on the map as shown in Exhibit A and as specifically described in Exhibit B, all of which are incorporated herein.

SECTION 2.

This ordinance must be posted in accordance with the Bakersfield Municipal Code and will become effective not less than 30 days from and after the date of its passage. ---------o0o---------
YA/S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD To R-4\01_Hearing Documents & Noticing Documents\1st CC\CC ZC ORD\ZC 25-0001 _CC ZC Ordinance-Final Draft.Docx
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted, by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on ______________________________ by the following vote:

JULIE DRIMAKIS, MMC
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of
the Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED: _________________
By __________________________

KAREN GOH
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

VIRGINIA GENNARO, CITY ATTORNEY
By: ____________________________

VIRIDIANA GALLARDO-KING
Deputy City Attorney
Exhibits: A Zone Change Map
B Legal Description

EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT "B"
Legal Description

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCELS H AND I OF PARCEL MAP WAIVER 17-0426 AS PER CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED MARCH 22, 2018 AS DOCUMENT NO. 218033665 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP WAIVER NO. 19-91 PER CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED AUGUST 19, 1991 IN BOOK 6558, PAGE 2342, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE KERN COUNTY RECORDER; ALSO BEING PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 30 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, M.D.M, IN THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCEL “H”:

COMMENCING AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE SOUTH 00°21'23" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 1,368.87 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH 00°22'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 531.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE

1. CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH 00°22'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 450.00 FEET; THENCE

2. DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE, NORTH 89°38'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 529.86 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 425.00 FEET, FROM WHICH POINT CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 63°15'44" WEST; THENCE

3. SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°04'14", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 96.95 FEET; THENCE

4. SOUTH 39°48'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 95.22 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL AND THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF CAMINO MEDIA; THENCE

5. NORTH 48°53'26" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 60.01 FEET; THENCE

6. DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE AND SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 39°48'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 93.86 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 365.00 FEET; THENCE

7. NORTHERLY ALONG LAST SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°26'41", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 251.28 FEET; THENCE

8. NORTH 00°21'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 261.20 FEET; THENCE

9. SOUTH 89°38'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 545.69 FEET TO TRUE THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

PARCEL “I”:

1. CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH 00°22'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 481.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL MARKED WITH A 5/8 INCH REBAR IN A CONCRETE MONUMENT, NOT

OF RECORD, AND THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CAMINO MEDIA, AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 725.00 FEET, FROM WHICH POINT CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 00°49'53" EAST; THENCE

2. WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL AND SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°02'47", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 494.08 FEET; THENCE

3. CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 48°53'26" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 247.46 FEET; THENCE

4. DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE AND SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 39°48'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 95.22 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 425.00 FEET; THENCE

5. NORTHEASTERLY ALONG LAST SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°04'14", AN ARC EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description
DISTANCE OF 96.95 FEET; THENCE

6. SOUTH 89°38'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 529.86 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

EXCEPTING FROM ALL PARCELS ALL OIL, GAS, OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND MINERALS OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER (COLLECTIVELY “MINERALS”), IN, ON, OR THEREUNDER, WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF ENTRY UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID PROPERTY, AND TO A DEPTH OF FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET, AS RESERVED BY TENNECO WEST, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, IN THE DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1979 IN BOOK 5245, PAGE 1003, AND RE-RECORDED IN BOOK 5255, PAGE 2137 AND EXCEPTING FROM ANY

PARCEL, AS AND TO THE EXTENT APPLICABLE, ALL MINERALS IN, ON, OR THEREUNDER, WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF ENTRY UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID PROPERTY, AND TO A DEPTH OF FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET, AS RESERVED BY TENNECO WEST, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, IN THE DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1987 IN BOOK 6081 AT PAGE 373, AND RE-RECORDED IN BOOK 6093 AT PAGE 724, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

MAP SET

S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 1 of 44

NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The City of Bakersfield’s Development Services Department, Planning Division, has completed an initial study (attached) of the possible environmental effects of the following-described project and has determined that a Negative Declaration is appropriate. It has been found that the proposed project, as described and proposed to be mitigated (if required), will not have a significant effect on the environment. This determination has been made according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Bakersfield’s CEQA Implementation Procedures.

PROJECT NO. (or Title): Zone Change No. 25-0001 (PP-ZC-25-0001) COMMENT PERIOD BEGINS: July 21, 2025
COMMENT PERIOD ENDS: August 21, 2025
MITIGATION MEASURES (included in the proposed project to avoid potentially significant effects, if required):

Air Quality Impact Mitigation Measures:

Biological Resources Impact Mitigation Measures:

3. Prior to ground disturbance and/or construction activities, the applicant/developer shall consult with and follow all California Department of Fish and Wildlife and United States Fish and Wildlife Service requirements related to listed plant and animal species protected under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). Applicant/developer shall have a qualified professional conduct and prepare a biological resource clearance survey no less than 14 days and no more than 30 days prior to the beginning of ground disturbance and/or construction activities for the detection of listed, or otherwise special-status species, likely to be impacted by any project related activity. a. If known or natal dens are detected during the survey, protective measures enumerated in the USFWS Standardized Recommendations for Protection of Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance (2011) shall be initiated. If the identified dens are unavoidable, pursuant to the guidelines, the CDFW and USFWS shall be contacted for additional guidance and take authorization. b. If Bakersfield cacti are identified during the survey, the CDFW shall be contacted for guidance concerning the feasibility of translocation.
c. The survey or separate survey shall include a focus on the burrowing owl. The survey shall follow the methodology developed by the California Burrowing Owl Consortium (CBOC 1993). The applicant/developer shall follow CDFW protocol for mitigation and comply with the provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

BAKERSFIELD
THE SOUND OF SDJt1dhw;-~
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 2 of 44

Geology and Soils, Cultural Resources, and Tribal Resources Impacts Mitigation Measures:

Traffic Impact Mitigation Measures:

S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 3 of 44

INITIAL STUDY

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

1. Project (Title & No.): Zone Change No. 25-0001 (PP-ZC-25-0001)

2. Lead Agency (name and address): City of Bakersfield
Development Services Department
1715 Chester Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301

3. Contact Person (name, title, phone): Yazid Alawgarey, Assistant Planner (661) 326-3191

4. Project Location: The project is located at 9700 Camino Media east of Old River Road on approximately 11.22 acres, [Assessor Parcel Numbers 390- 300-29 and-30] Bakersfield, CA 93311

5. Applicant (name and address): McIntosh & Associates

2001 Wheelan Court
Bakersfield, CA 93309

6. General Plan Designation: HMR (High Medium Residential)

7. Zoning: R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development)

8. Description of Project (describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the Project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation.):

McIntosh & Associates (applicant), on behalf of Camino Media Properties, LLC (property owner), has requested a Zone Change to change the existing zoning from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-4 (High Density Multi-Unit Dwelling) on approximately 11.22 acres [Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APN) 390-300-29 and -30].

The project intends to develop a 191-unit, two-story apartment complex with on-site recreation amenities as a clubhouse/fitness facility and a swimming pool and cabana.

9. Environmental Setting (briefly describe the existing onsite conditions and surrounding land uses):

The proposed project site is currently undeveloped vacant land. The areas to the north, west, and south are commercial offices. The area to the east is vacant undeveloped land.

S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 4 of 44

10. Other public agencies whose approval is anticipated to be required (e.g., permits, financing approval or participation agreement):

Agency Approvals and Decisions
Subsequent City of Bakersfield Approvals
Development Services Department
Public Works Department
• Issue grading permits.
• Issue building permits.
• Accept public right-of-way dedications.
• Approve road improvement plans.
• Issue encroachment permits.
• Approve proposed sewer connections and
improvements.

Other Agencies – Subsequent Approvals and Permits
Regional Water Quality Control Board • Issue a Construction Activity General Construction Permit.
• Confirm Compliance with National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and
Waste Discharge Requirements.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution
Control District
• Approve Indirect Source Rule compliance.

California Water Service Bakersfield
District
• Approve proposed water connections and
improvements.

S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 5 of 44

Zone Change
25-001
AERIAL
(:J

BAKERSFIELD
t
Feet
0 375 750
7/14/2025
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 6 of 44

Zone Change
25-001 p CSUB ACCESS WAY
Land Use
iEIIDENTIAL
LMR -LowMedium
Density Residential:
- > 4unitsbut S IO dwelling units/net
acre
HMR - High Medium
Density Residential:
- > 7.26 units but S 17.42dwelling
units/net acre
LR - Low Density
Residential, S 7.26
dwelling units/net
acre

COMMERCIAL
-
GC - General
Commercial
- DC -Office Commercial

PUBLIC FACILITIES
- P-Publicfocilities
- LR/Pl
- PS -Public/Private Schools

OPEN SPACE
-
DI-P -Parks and
Recreation
(:J BAKERSFIELD
t
Feet
0 375 750
7/14/2025
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 7 of 44

Zone Change
25-001
R-1

ROWDY LN
R-1
R-1
z
z
~
C
0 Zoning
Commercial Zone Designations
C-0 Commercial and
Professional Office
- C-2Regionol
Commercial
- C-2/P.C.D. Combining
Resource Zone Designations
- DSDpenlpace
ResidentialZoneDesignalions
R-1 One family
Dwelling
R-1/P.U.D. Combining
R-2/P.U.D. Combining
R-3 Limited Multiple
1111 Family Dwelling Zone
- I unit/l,250sq. h.
(:,

BAKERSFIELD
t
Feet
0 375 750
7/14/2025
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 8 of 44

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:

As indicated by the checklist on the following pages, the project would result in potentially significant impacts with respect to the environmental factors checked below (Impacts reduced to a less than significant level through the incorporation of mitigation are not considered potentially significant.):
□ Aesthetics □ Agricultural Resources □ Air Quality
□ Biological Resources □ Cultural Resources □ Geology / Soils □ Greenhouse Gas Emissions □ Hazards & Hazardous Materials □ Hydrology / Water Quality □ Land Use / Planning □ Mineral Resources □ Noise
□ Population / Housing □ Public Services □ Recreation
□ Transportation / Traffic □ Utilities / Service Systems □ Mandatory Findings of Significance
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

On the basis of this initial evaluation:
□ I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment, and a negative declaration will be prepared.
■ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A mitigated negative declaration will be prepared. □ I find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and an environmental impact report is required.
□ I find that the proposed project may have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect has been (1) adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on the attached sheets. An environmental impact report is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. □ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects have been (1) analyzed adequately in an earlier environmental impact report or negative declaration pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier environmental impact report or negative declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Yazid Alawgarey 7/15/25
Signature Date
Yazid Alawgarey
Printed Name
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 9 of 44

EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, “Earlier Analyses,” may be crossreferenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant.

Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 10 of 44

Environmental Checklist and Analysis
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I. AESTHETICS: Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcrops, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
c. In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the Project
conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations
governing scenic quality?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
Discussion
a. Less-than-significant impact. The project is located on the west side of Bakersfield, in a predominantly urban area. The existing visual environment in the area consists of office commercial to the north, west and south and California State University Bakersfield undeveloped land to the east. The project does not conflict with any applicable vista protection standards, scenic resource protection requirements, or design criteria of federal, state, or local agencies. The project site is located within an area having slopes of 0 to 2 % in any direction. The area is not regarded or designated within the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan as visually important or “scenic.” The construction of residential uses at the site would be in character and compatible with existing land uses in the vicinity and is a natural extension of the residential growth occurring in the project area. Therefore, the project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, and impacts are less than significant.
b. No impact. There are several trees along the southern perimeter of the lot, but no rock outcrops, or historic buildings located at the project site. Additionally, the project site is not located adjacent to or near any officially designated or potentially eligible scenic highways to be listed on the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) State Scenic Highway System (Caltrans 2017).

The closest section of highway eligible for state scenic highway designation is State Route (SR) 14 (Caltrans 2017), located in Kern County over 60 miles to the east. Therefore, the project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcrops, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway.
c. Less-than-significant impact. Please refer to responses I.a, I.b, and I.d. As described, the project is located within a mixed-use area and is contiguous to existing and newly developed land uses.

There are no local vista protection standards, scenic resource protection requirements, or design criteria that apply to the project. Therefore, the project would not conflict with applicable zoning I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 11 of 44

and other regulations governing scenic quality in urbanized areas, and impacts are less than significant.
d. Less-than-significant impact. This project involves incremental residential growth within the City of Bakersfield’s jurisdiction. This project would be required to comply with City development standards, including Bakersfield Municipal Code Title 17 (zoning ordinance), Title 15 (buildings and construction), and California Code of Regulations Title 24 (building code). Together, these local and state requirements oblige compliance with current lighting standards that minimize unwanted light or glare to spill over into neighboring properties. Therefore, the project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area, and impacts are less than significant.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:

In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a. Convert prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance (farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)) or timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526) or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code section
51104(g))?
d. Result in the loss of forestland or conversion of forest land to non-forest?
e. Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
Discussion
a. No impact. The project site is not designated by the California Department of Conservation as prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance. Therefore, the project would not result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use.

I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 12 of 44

b. No impact. The project site is currently zoned R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) for residential uses, meaning it is not an agricultural zone and is not under a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, the project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract.
c. No impact. As discussed in II.b, the project site is zoned for residential uses. No lands within or immediately adjacent to the project site are zoned forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. Therefore, the project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land or timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. d. No impact. As discussed in II.c, no lands within or immediately adjacent to the project are zoned forest land or timberland and do not contain any forested areas. Therefore, the project would not result in the loss of forestland or conversion of forest land to non-forest. e. No impact. Please refer to responses II.a through II.d. This project proposes residential uses in an area designated for urban development by the General Plan. There are no agricultural or forestlands in proximity to the project that would experience conflicts in operation due to the proposed development. Therefore, the project would not involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
III. AIR QUALITY:

Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
d. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Discussion
a. Less-than-significant impact with mitigation incorporated. The project is located within the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) jurisdiction, in the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB). As such, air quality impacts from the project are controlled through policies and provisions of the SJVAPCD and the General Plan. The SJVAPCD has adopted an Air Quality I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
~
□
□
□
□
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 13 of 44

Attainment Plan (AQAP) and is required to submit a “Rate of Progress” document to the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) that demonstrates past and planned progress toward reaching attainment for all criteria pollutants.

The SJVAB is classified by the state as being in severe nonattainment for the state 1-hour ozone standard as well as in nonattainment for the state particulate matter less than 10 microns (PM10) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5). The SJVAB is also classified as extreme nonattainment for the federal 8-hour ozone standard, nonattainment for the federal PM2.5 standard, and attainment/maintenance for the federal carbon monoxide (CO) and PM10 standards.

The SJVAPCD requires local jurisdictions to design all developments in ways that reduce air pollution from vehicles, which is the largest single category of air pollution in the San Joaquin Valley, and from other stationary sources. The Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI) (SJVAPCD 2015) lists various land uses and design strategies that reduce air quality impacts of new development. Local ordinance and General Plan requirements related to landscaping, sidewalks, street improvements, level of traffic service, energy-efficient heating and cooling, building code requirements, and location of commercial development in proximity to residential development are consistent with these listed strategies. Regulation and policy that will result in the compliance with air quality strategies for the new residential development include but are not limited to, Title 24 efficiency standards, Title 20 appliance energy efficiency standards, 2005 building energy efficiency standards, Assembly Bill (AB) 1493 motor vehicle standards, and compliance with the MBGP Air Quality Conservation Element as well as the SJVAPCD air quality guidelines and rules.

A Small Project Analysis Level Assessment, provided by Trinity Consultants, was completed for the project. The report includes California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) emissions estimates, criteria pollutant analysis, and GHG analysis. The report concluded that mass emissions of criteria pollutants from the construction and operation of the proposed project are below the SJVAPCD’s established emissions impact thresholds.

As shown in the table below, the SJVAPCD has established the following specific criteria for pollutant thresholds of significance:

SJVAPCD Significance Thresholds for
Criteria Pollutants
Air Pollutant Tons/Year
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 100
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) 10
Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) 10
Sulfur Oxides (SOX) 27
Particulate Matter, less than 10
microns (PM10)
15 Particulate Matter, less than 2.5
microns (PM2.5)
15 Source: SJVAPCD 2015
Construction of the project would result in air pollutant emissions. Emissions from construction would result from fuel combustion and exhaust from equipment, as well as vehicle traffic, grading, I:,

BAKERSFIELD
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 14 of 44

and the use of toxic materials (e.g., lubricants). The following table provides estimated construction emissions from the project. It was assumed in developing construction emission calculations that the implementation of effective and comprehensive dust control measures under Regulation VIII – PM10 Fugitive Prohibitions – would be used during construction.

The following table provides the estimated construction emissions from the project:

Construction Emissions Summary and Significance Evaluation Criteria Pollutants Unmitigated Mitigated Threshold Significance tons/year tons/year tons/year
Reactive Organic Gas
(VOC)

0.71 0.71 10 Less Than Sig.

NOX 1.87 1.87 10 Less Than Sig.

CO 3.21 3.21 100 Less Than Sig.

SOX 0.00 0.00 27 Less Than Sig.

PM10 0.36 0.36 15 Less Than Sig.

PM2.5 0.15 0.15 15 Less Than Sig.

Source: Trinity Consultants Small Project Analysis Level Assessment 2025 As shown in the above table, construction emissions are not predicted to exceed SJVAPCD significance threshold levels.

Project operations would also result in air pollutant emissions. The main source of emissions would be from vehicular traffic associated with the project site. The following table provides estimated operational emissions from the project:

Operational Emissions Summary and Significance Evaluation Criteria Pollutants Unmitigated Mitigated Threshold Significance tons/year tons/year tons/year
Reactive Organic Gas
(VOC)

1.70 1.70 10 Less Than Sig.

NOX 1.02 1.02 10 Less Than Sig.

CO 7.78 7.78 100 Less Than Sig.

SOX 0.02 0.02 27 Less Than Sig.

PM10 1.71 1.71 15 Less Than Sig.

PM2.5 0.46 0.46 15 Less Than Sig.

Source: Trinity Consultants Small Project Analysis Level Assessment 2025 As shown in the above table, operational emissions are not predicted to exceed SJVAPCD significance threshold levels.

With the implementation of Mitigation Measure 1, the project would not conflict with, or obstruct the implementation of, the applicable air quality plan. Mitigation Measure 2 requires that the necessary fees be paid to the SJVAPCD. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures 1 and 2, the project would not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the applicable air quality I:,

BAKERSFIELD
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 15 of 44

plan. Therefore, the project would not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the applicable air quality plan, and impacts are less than significant with mitigation incorporated. b. Less-than-significant impact. Under the SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI, any project that would have individually significant air quality impacts would also be considered to have significant cumulative air quality impacts. Impacts of local pollutants are cumulatively significant when the combined emissions from the project and other planned projects exceed air quality standards. The following table shows the project’s contribution to cumulative emissions calculated for both Kern County and the greater SJVAB:

Cumulative Emissions
Emissions Inventory Pollutants (tons/year)
ROG NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Kern County 21,353 10,804 27,338 511 13,651 3,723
SJVAB 107,347 52,451 162,425 2,847 96,652 95.922
Project 0.18 1.72 0.32 0 0.09 0.54
Project’s % of Kern 0.001% 0.016% 0.001% N/A 0.001% 0.004% Project’s % of SJVAB 19.89% 20.60% 0.000% N/A 0.000% 14.23% Note: Latest inventory available as of March 2023
Source: CARB 2023b
As shown in the above table, the project does not pose a significant increase to estimated cumulative emissions for criteria pollutants in nonattainment within Kern County and the greater SJVAB. The project’s regional contribution to cumulative impacts would be negligible (well less than 1% for all pollutants under consideration) and does not pose a substantial increase to basin emissions. Therefore, the project’s contribution is not cumulatively considerable.

Additionally, the GAMAQI, citing CEQA Guidelines Section15064(h)(3), states on page 66 that “[a] Lead Agency may determine that a project’s incremental contribution to a cumulative effect is not cumulatively considerable if the project will comply with the requirements in a previously approved plan or mitigation program, including, but not limited to an air quality attainment or maintenance plan that provides specific requirements that will avoid or substantially lessen the cumulative problem within the geographic area in which the project is located” (SJVAPCD 2015).

This project would also be required, when applicable, to follow air quality control measures and rules required by the SJVAPCD, which include, but are not limited to, SJVAPCD Rule 2010 (Permits Required), SJVAPCD Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review Rule), SJVAPCD Rule 4102 (Nuisance), and SJVAPCD Rule 9510 (Indirect Source Rule), each of which is discussed below.

SJVAPCD Rule 2010 requires any person constructing, altering, replacing, or operating any source operation that emits, may emit, or may reduce emissions to obtain an Authority to Construct or a Permit to Operate from the SJVAPCD Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO). The project will comply with this rule by obtaining authorization from APCO before commencing construction on the project.

SJVAPCD Rule 2201 requires review and offset of stationary sources of air pollution and no net increase in emissions above specified thresholds from new and modified stationary sources of all nonattainment pollutants and their precursors. This is achieved by using mechanisms as approved by the SJVAPCD, such as emission trade-offs by which a permit to construct or operate any source I:,

BAKERSFIELD
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 16 of 44

of pollution is granted. The project will comply with this rule by demonstrating compliance when obtaining authorization from APCO under Rule 2010. For example, compliance with Rule 2201 may include using Best Available Control Technology and providing emission offsets.

SJVAPCD Rule 4102 protects the health and safety of the public by prohibiting discharge from any source whatsoever of air contaminants that cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or other annoyance to any considerable number of people. The project will comply with this rule by not discharging air contaminants or other materials, which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or other annoyance to any considerable number of people.

SJVAPCD Rule 9510 requires the reduction of emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX) and particulate matter smaller than ten microns in aerodynamic diameter (PM10) associated with construction and operational activities of development projects occurring within the San Joaquin Valley. Rule 9510 applies to new development projects that would equal or exceed specific size limits called applicability thresholds (e.g., developing more than 2,000 square feet of commercial space, 25,000 square feet of multi-family housing space, 10,000 square feet of heavy industrial space, or 50 residential units). The project is subject to SJVAPCD Rule 9510 because it exceeds the applicability threshold for developing more than 25,000 square feet and 50 residential units.

Accordingly, the project must reduce a portion of the emissions occurring during construction and operational phases through on-site measures or pay off-site mitigation fees. The objective of this rule is to reduce construction NOX and PM10 emissions by 20% and 45%, respectively, as well as to reduce operational NOX and PM10 emissions by 33.3% and 50%, respectively, when compared to unmitigated projects. The SJVAPCD uses CalEEMOD (California Emission Estimator Model) to estimate emissions of NOX and PM10 for potential land uses. Examples of measures that may be implemented to reduce emissions under this rule include but are not limited to, incorporating energy efficiency beyond Title 24 requirements, providing bicycle lanes throughout a project, using cleaner fleet construction vehicles, providing employee incentives for using alternative transportation, and building in proximity to existing or planned bus stops. When a development project cannot reduce its NOX and PM10 emissions to the level required by Rule 9510, then the difference must be mitigated through the payment of an off-site emissions reduction fee. One hundred percent (100%) of all off-site mitigation fees are used by the SJVAPCD to fund emission reduction projects through its Incentives Programs, achieving emission reductions on behalf of the project.

Because the air quality modeling indicates that the project’s regional contribution to cumulative impacts would be negligible, and the project would comply with the requirements of the SJVAPCD attainment plans and rules, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. Therefore, based on these anticipated activity levels, the project construction activities would not exceed construction thresholds, and impacts are less than significant.
c. Less-than-significant impact. Some land uses are deemed more sensitive to air pollution than others due to the types of population groups or activities associated with a land use that could result in a sensitive receptor experiencing sustained exposure to said air pollution. Population groups considered sensitive receptors include young children, chronically ill individuals, the elderly, and/or people who are more sensitive than the general population. Sensitive receptors can be expected to reside in locations such as schools, hospitals, nursing homes, and daycare centers.

The project is located at 9700 Camino Media. The closest school is Ronald Reagan Elementary School at 0.58 miles to the west. The closest hospital is Mercy Hospital Southwest at 0.34 miles north, and the closest daycare facility is Childtime of Bakersfield at 0.03 miles to the south of the Project.

I:,

BAKERSFIELD
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 17 of 44

Based on the predicted operational emissions and activity types, the proposed Project is not expected to affect any on-site or off-site sensitive receptors and is not expected to have any adverse impacts on any known sensitive receptor (Trinity Consultants Small Project Analysis Level Assessment 2025). Therefore, the project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, and impacts are less than significant. d. Less-than-significant impact. The proposed Project consists of residential uses that do not include activities listed in Table 6 of the SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI. Therefore, the Project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people, and impacts are less than significant.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with an established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Discussion
a. Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. The project site has the potential to result in significant impacts on some special-status wildlife species, but no listed special-status plant and animal species were found on the site during reconnaissance-level surveys for the project (Pruett Biological Resource Evaluation 2025).

I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 18 of 44

Despite there being no indication of special-status wildlife species use on the project site during the site visit, there is potential for use by special-status species in the future due to the project’s overall location within the Central Valley region. A database search of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and the California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS) Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants revealed several special-status species that occur in the region.

The project is subject to the terms of Section 10(a)(1)(b) and Section 2081 permits issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service(“USFWS”) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”), respectively. Terms of these permits require applicants for all development projects within the plan area to comply directly with requests of the USFWS and the CDFW.

Mitigation Measures 3 – 4 require a survey prior to ground disturbance for any special-status wildlife species and compliance with any requirements of the CDFW and USFWS to reduce or avoid significant impacts to biological resources. In addition, Mitigation Measure 3 requires training of on-site personnel to increase awareness of FESA and CESA. Therefore, with the implementation of the mitigation measures the project would not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or specialstatus species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by CDFW or USFWS, and impacts are less than significant with mitigation incorporated. b. No impact. There is no riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities located at the site (Pruett Biological Resource Evaluation 2025). This project is not located within, or adjacent to, the Kern River riparian habitat area, nor within the Kern River flood plain, or along a canal that has been identified by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service as a corridor for native resident wildlife species. Therefore, the project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community.
c. No impact. There are no wetlands, as defined by Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA), located at the project site or within or near the site. Therefore, the project would not have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands. d. Less-than-significant with mitigation incorporated. It was concluded that the project would not interfere with wildlife movement (Pruett Biological Resource Evaluation 2025). The project is not within the Kern River floodplain, or along a canal that has been identified by the USFWS as a corridor for native resident wildlife species. There is the potential during construction to temporarily affect nursery sites such as dens and burrows. Project construction could cause the direct destruction of a nursery site or cause enough of an indirect disturbance to cause special-status wildlife to abandon a nursery site. However, Mitigation Measure 3 requires preconstruction surveys and, if necessary, additional mitigation recommended by a qualified biologist and CDFW to reduce potential impacts on nursery sites. Therefore, with the implementation of Mitigation Measure 3, the project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident, migratory fish, wildlife species, established native residents, migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites, and impacts are less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
e. Less than significant impact. It was concluded that the project site does not contain any biological resources that are protected by local policies or ordinances protecting any biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance (Pruett Biological Resource Evaluation 2025).

Therefore, the project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources and impacts are less than significant.

I:,

BAKERSFIELD
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 19 of 44

f. Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Please refer to responses IV.a, IV.d, and IV.e.

With the implementation of Mitigation Measure 3, the project would not conflict with the provisions of a local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan, and impacts are less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
c. Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
Discussion
a. Less than significant impact. A records search for the site and the surrounding area was conducted by Celeste M. Thomson at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center, 2021). Upon the completion of this records search, it was determined that there are no historical resources on-site. Therefore, the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and impacts are less than significant.
b. Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. It was concluded that the project site has no prehistoric or historic archaeological sites present (Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center, 2021). However, there is still the potential to unearth previously unknown archaeological resources at the site, and grading and other ground-disturbing activities have the potential to damage or destroy such resources. Mitigation Measure 4 requires that construction workers be provided with cultural awareness training. Mitigation Measure 5 requires ceasing work and investigating any discovery if previously unknown archaeological resources are unearthed during construction. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures 4 and 5, the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource, and impacts are less than significant with mitigations incorporated. c. Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. There are no known human remains present at the Project site (Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center, 2021). The project could inadvertently uncover, or damage, previously unknown human remains. Mitigation Measure 6 requires that if any human remains are found at the site during construction, work will cease, and the remains will be handled pursuant to applicable law. With the implementation of Mitigation Measure 6, the project would not significantly disturb any human remains, and impacts are less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□
□
□
□
[81
[81
□
□
□
□
□
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 20 of 44

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
VI. ENERGY: Would the project:
a. Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or
operation?
b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Discussion
a. Less than significant impact. Project construction would require temporary energy demands typical of other multi-family housing projects that occur throughout the state and this development’s construction would not result in inefficient or unnecessary consumption of energy resources beyond typical residential construction. All new construction within the City must adhere to adopted building standards, including California Code of Regulations Title 24, which outlines energy efficiency standards for new, multi-family housing buildings to ensure that they do not wastefully, inefficiently, or unnecessarily consume energy. Therefore, the project would not result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation, and impacts are less than significant.
b. Less than significant impact. There is no adopted plan by the City of Bakersfield for renewable energy or energy efficiency. As mentioned above, all new development projects within the City are required to adhere to adopted building standards related to energy efficiency. Additionally, the City encourages applicants/developers to go beyond the required standards and make their developments even more efficient through programs such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), which is a green building rating system that provides a framework to create healthy, highly efficient, and cost-saving green buildings. Other encouraged programs available to applicants/developers are Title 20 appliance energy efficiency standards and 2005 building energy efficiency standards. Therefore, the project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency, and impacts are less than significant.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project:
a. Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map, issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.

I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 21 of 44

ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?

c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
Discussion
a. The following discusses the potential for the project to expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects because of various geologic hazards. The City is within a seismically active area.

According to the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan, major active fault systems border the southern portion of the San Joaquin Valley. Among these major active fault systems include the San Andreas, Breckenridge-Kern County, Garlock, Pond Poso, and White Wolf faults. There are additional smaller faults suspected of occurring within the Bakersfield area, which may or may not be active. The active faults have a maximum credible Richter magnitude that ranges from 6.0 (Breckenridge-Kern County) to 8.3 (San Andreas). Potential seismic hazards in the planning area involve strong ground shaking, fault rupture, liquefaction, and landslides. i. No Impact. Ground rupture is ground deformation that occurs along the surface trace of a fault during an earthquake. According to the California Department of Conservation’s Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation map, the project site is not located within an earthquake fault zone. Therefore, the project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault. ii. Less than significant impact. The City is within a seismically active area. Future structures proposed on the project site are required by state law and City ordinance to be constructed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (specifically Seismic Zone 4, which has the most stringent seismic construction requirements in the United States), and to adhere to all modern earthquake construction standards. Therefore, the project would I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 22 of 44

not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving strong seismic ground shaking, and impacts are less than significant. iii. Less than significant impact. The most common seismic-related ground failure is liquefaction and lateral spreading. In both cases, during periods of ground motion caused by an event such as an earthquake, loose materials transform from a solid state to a nearliquid state because of increased pore water pressure. Such ground failure generally requires a high-water table and poorly draining soil for such this to occur. The project site is relatively flat and level with no major changes in grade. Public supply wells in Kern County are at depths between 600 and 800 feet below land surfaces (USGS 2016), meaning that groundwater levels are not close enough to the surface to result in sufficiently saturated soils suitable for liquefaction. In addition, future structures proposed on the project site are required by state law and City ordinance to be constructed by the Uniform Building Code, including those relating to soil characteristics. Therefore, the project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, and impacts are less than significant. iv. No impact. In Kern County, the common types of landslides induced by earthquakes occur on steeper slopes found in the foothills and along the Kern River Canyon; in these areas, landslides are generally associated with bluff and stream bank failure, rockslide, and slope slip on steep slopes. The project site is relatively flat and level with no major changes in grade. Therefore, the project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving landslides.
b. Less than significant impact. Construction of the site would temporarily disturb soils, which in turn could loosen said soils. However, the proposed development entails paving over these soils with impervious surfaces, meaning the project site would not be particularly susceptible to soil erosion.

In addition, the relatively low precipitation that occurs in the project area (on average about 7 to 10 inches/year) results in surface runoff that is intermittent and temporary. The erosion potential at the site, low average rainfall, and the fact that soils are well drained do not make the site susceptible to substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil, and impacts are less than significant. c. Less than significant impact. As discussed above, the soils at the project site would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, lateral spreading, or landslides.

Subsidence is part of the baseline condition in the project area due to historic groundwater pumping and the resultant subsidence that occurs with such activities. The project would not substantially contribute to this baseline condition because the projected water use has been conditionally approved by the California Water Service Company Bakersfield District (the District).

The site has been considered by the District against its current Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and it was concluded that the City has sufficient existing capacity to service the project.

Therefore, the project has already been considered in the groundwater analysis in the UWMP and would not exacerbate subsidence in the area beyond the baseline condition.

Collapsible soils consist of loose, dry, low-density materials that collapse and compact under the addition of water or excessive loading. Future structures proposed on the project site are required by state law and City ordinance to be constructed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, including those relating to soil characteristics. Therefore, the project would not be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable because of the project, and I:,

BAKERSFIELD
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 23 of 44

potentially result in an on-site or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse, and impacts are less than significant.
d. Less-than-significant impact. The soils identified on or around the project site is sandy loam, which do not have a high potential to be expansive. Additionally, future structures proposed on the site are required by state law and City ordinance to be constructed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, including those relating to soil characteristics. Therefore, the project would not be located on expansive soil creating substantial risks to life or property, and impacts are less than significant.
e. No impact. The project would not require the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems because the project would connect to existing City sewer services in the area. Therefore, there would be no impacts related to soils incapable of adequately supporting septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems.
f. Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Paleontological sensitivity is determined by the potential for a geologic unit to produce scientifically significant fossils. Because paleontological resources typically occur in the substratum soil horizon, surface expressions are often not visible during a pedestrian survey. Paleontological sensitivity is derived from known fossil data collected from the entire geologic unit. The project site is entirely underlain by alluvial fan deposits of the late Holocene age, which presumably transition in the subsurface into older, Pleistocene-age deposits.

Like archeological resources, there is the potential to unearth previously unknown paleontological resources at the site, and grading and other ground-disturbing activities have the potential to damage or destroy such resources. Therefore, with the implementation of Mitigation Measure 5, the project would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource site or unique geologic feature, and impacts are less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: Would the project:
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Discussion
a. Less than significant impact. The project would generate an incremental contribution and, when combined with the cumulative increase of all other sources of greenhouse gases (GHG), could contribute to global climate change impacts. Although the project is expected to emit GHGs, the GHG emissions of a single project into the atmosphere are not necessarily an adverse environmental effect. Rather, it is the increased accumulation of GHG emissions from more than one project and many sources in the atmosphere that may result in global climate change. The I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□ □ □
□ □ □
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 24 of 44

resultant consequences of climate change can cause adverse environmental effects. A project’s GHG emissions would typically be small in comparison to state or global GHG emissions and, consequently, in isolation would have no significant direct impact on climate change. Therefore, a project’s GHG emissions and the resulting significance of potential impacts are more properly assessed on a cumulative basis.

On September 27, 2006, Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (the Act) was enacted by the State of California. The Act charged the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) with the responsibility to monitor, regulate, and reduce GHG emissions.

CARB defined the 1990 baseline emissions for California and adopted that baseline as the 2020 statewide emissions cap at the time. AB 32 required new development projects that are not exempt under CEQA to demonstrate at least a 29% reduction in estimated GHG emissions when compared to the 1990 baseline. Subsequent legislation by the California legislature has included Senate Bill 32 (SB 32), which expanded upon AB 32 to reduce GHG emissions to 40% below the 1990 levels by 2030; AB 197, which increased the legislative oversight of CARB via the addition of two legislatively appointed non-voting members and provided added protections for disadvantaged communities; SB 350, which increased California’s renewable energy procurement goal; and SB 100, which established a landmark policy requiring 100% of electrical retail sales to end-use customers and 100% of electricity to serve state agencies to be produced via renewable energy and zero-carbon resources by 2045.

The California Supreme Court’s decision in the “Center for Biological Diversity v. California Department of Fish and Wildlife; The Newhall Land and Farming Company, Real Party in Interest, Case No. S217763,” determined that the Newhall Ranch project’s Environmental Impact Report (EIR) did not substantiate the conclusion that the GHG cumulative impacts would be less than significant. The EIR determined that the project would reduce estimated GHG emissions by 31%, meeting the required 29% reduction, by comparing these emissions to business-as-usual (BAU) levels established through AB 32. The Court determined that the EIR’s deficiency stemmed from using this quantitative comparison method developed by the Scoping Plan as a measure of the GHG reduction effort required by the state and attempting to do so, without adjustments, for a purpose substantially different from its original design. The Court’s final ruling offered several examples that an agency can use to determine that a project’s GHG emissions are less than significant (Center for Biological Diversity v. The Newhall Land and Farming Company, Real Party in Interest, 2015):

1. Lead agencies can use the business-as-usual comparison methodology if they determine what reduction a particular project must achieve to comply with statewide goals;

2. Project design features that comply with regulations to reduce emissions may demonstrate that those components of emissions are less than significant; and

3. Lead agencies could also demonstrate compliance with locally adopted climate plans or could apply specific numerical thresholds developed by some local agencies, to demonstrate emissions are less than significant.

Although the City of Bakersfield has not developed specific thresholds for GHG emissions, the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD), a CEQA Trustee Agency for the project, has developed thresholds. These thresholds entail either implementing Best Performance Standards (BPS) or demonstrating a 29% reduction in estimated GHG emissions when compared to BAU levels of emissions. However, the BAU emissions provided by the SJVAPCD are based on the years 2002 to 2004 and 2020. Since the 2020 project baseline has passed, and at this time no new guidance has been approved by the SJVAPCD for the next target year, the 29% reduction I:,

BAKERSFIELD
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 25 of 44

requirement cannot be applied to this project to determine GHG emission significance.

Additionally, BPS thresholds have not been established by the SJVAPCD, making the use of BPS on their own an insufficient means of determining significance as well. Lacking any locally adopted climate plans or specific numerical thresholds developed by a local agency at this time, the project relies on design features that comply with state regulations to reduce GHG emissions.

Regardless, project GHG emissions levels were calculated for disclosure purposes and are as follows:

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Summary and Significance Evaluation Greenhouse Gases Unmitigated (MT/year) Mitigated (MT/year) CO2 1,983 1,983
CH4 1.98 1.98
N2O 0.08 0.08
CO2e 2,060 2,060
Source: Trinity Consultants Small Project Analysis Level Assessment 2025 When considering the use of design features that comply with state regulations to reduce GHG emissions, one can look to the argument made by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) in their Final Negative Declaration for the Phillips 66 Los Angeles Refinery Carson Plant – Crude Oil Storage Capacity project (South Coast AQMD, 2014). This approach recognizes that consumers of electricity and fuels used for transportation activities are regulated by requiring producers and importers of these resources to participate in programs, such as the GHG Capand-Trade program. Each sector-wide state program exists within the framework of AB 32, and its descendant legislation, which all seek to achieve GHG emissions reductions consistent with the AB 32 Scoping Plan.

The main sources of GHG emissions associated with this project are energy use and combustion of gasoline/diesel fuels, each of which is regulated near or at the top of the supply chain. As such, the project will have no choice but to purchase said electricity and fuels that are produced in a way deemed acceptable to the California market. Additionally, the project will abide by California’s Building Energy Efficiency Standards and Title 24 requirements, implementing energy conservation features in this proposed development. The project will also implement GHG emission mitigations such as on-site vehicle idling limits and zero emission infrastructure (e.g., electric vehicle charging stations). Therefore, the project's GHG emissions will be consistent with the AB 32 Scoping Plan, and the project’s contribution to cumulative global climate change impacts would not be cumulatively considerable, and impacts are less than significant. b. Less than significant impact. CARB is responsible for the coordination and administration of both federal and state air pollution control programs within California. As proposed, the project would not conflict with any statewide policy, regional plan, or local guidance or policy adopted to reduce GHG emissions. The project would not interfere with the implementation of AB 32 and SB 375 because it would be consistent with the GHG emission reduction targets identified by CARB and the Scoping Plan as described in VIII.a. Therefore, the project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, and impacts are less than significant.

I:,

BAKERSFIELD
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 26 of 44

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code §65962.5 and, as a result, would it
create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
Discussion
a. Less than significant impact. Construction activities would require the transport, storage, use, and/or disposal of hazardous materials such as fuels and greases for the fueling/servicing of construction equipment and fuel tanks, and there is the potential for upset and accident conditions that could release such material into the environment. Such substances would be stored in temporary storage tanks/sheds that would be located at the site. Although these types of materials are not acutely hazardous, they are classified as hazardous materials and create the potential for accidental spillage, which could expose construction workers. All transport, storage, use, and disposal of hazardous materials used in the construction of the project would be in strict accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. During construction of the project, Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for all applicable materials present at the site would be made readily available to on-site personnel. During construction, non-hazardous construction debris would be generated and disposed of at approved facilities for handling such waste. Also, during construction, waste disposal would be managed using portable toilets located at reasonably accessible on-site locations.

I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 27 of 44

Day-to-day operational activities may involve routine transport, use of, and/or disposal of hazardous materials as defined by the Hazardous Materials Transportation Uniform Safety Act, namely gasoline transport and storage. The routine transport of gasoline to the project site would have to comply with all laws and regulations related to hazardous material routes and the proper transfer of gasoline to the site. Users should also read product labels for disposal directions to reduce the risk of products exploding, igniting, leaking, mixing with other chemicals, or posing other hazards on the way to a disposal facility. Therefore, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, and impacts are less than significant. b. Less than significant impact. Please refer to response IX.a. The project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous material into the environment, and impacts are less than significant.
c. Less than significant impact. The Air Quality Analysis (AQIA) concluded that the project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations or result in other emissions that would adversely affect a substantial number of people (Trinity Consultants Small Project Analysis Level Assessment 2025). As mentioned above, the project would be required to adhere to all applicable federal and state laws and regulations concerning the handling of hazardous materials, and impacts are less than significant.
d. No impact. The EnviroStor (DTSC 2023) and Cortese (CalEPA 2023) lists under Government Code (GC) Section 65962.5 were reviewed. No portion of the project site is identified on either list, which provides the location of known hazardous waste concerns. Therefore, the project would not be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to GC Section 65962.5 and, as a result, create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. e. No impact. The project site is not located within the Kern County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan area (Kern County 2012). The closest airport to the site is the Meadows Field Airport, which is located approximately 6 miles northeast. Therefore, the project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area. The project is not located within the specified distance within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted.
f. Less than significant impact. Access to the site would be maintained throughout the construction period, and appropriate detours would be provided in the event of potential temporary road closures. The project would not interfere with any local or regional emergency response or evacuation plans because the project would not result in a substantial alteration to the adjacent and area circulation system. The project is typical of urban development in Bakersfield and is consistent with the adopted City of Bakersfield Hazardous Materials Area Plan (Bakersfield 1997).

This plan identifies responsibilities and provides coordination of emergency response at the local level to hazardous materials incidents. Therefore, the project would not impair the implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and impacts are less than significant.
g. Less than significant impact. The project site is not located within a “very high,” “high,” or “moderate” fire hazard severity zone (CalFire 2022). The site is surrounded by both developed and undeveloped land, and its vicinity is urban and does not possess high fuel loads that have a high potential to cause a wildland fire. The project site would be developed with hardscapes and irrigated landscaping, which would further reduce fire potential at the site. Therefore, the project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland I:,

BAKERSFIELD
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 28 of 44

fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands, and impacts are less than significant.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project:
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the
project may impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
d. Result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? e. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite?
f. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
g. Impede or redirect flood flows?
h. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
i. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
quality control plan or sustainable groundwater
management plan?
Discussion
a. Less than significant impact. Construction would include ground-disturbing activities that would temporarily disturb and potentially loosen soils. However, during operation, the soils would be paved over with impervious surfaces such that the soils at the site would not be particularly susceptible to soil erosion.

The City owns and maintains a municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4). The project’s operational urban stormwater discharges are covered under the Central Valley Water Quality I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 29 of 44

Control Board (“CVRWQCB”) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements General Permit for Discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (Order No. R5-2016-0040; NPDES No. CAS0085324) (MS4 Permit) (CVRWQCB 2016). The MS4 Permit mandates the implementation of a stormwater management framework to ensure that water quality is maintained despite operational stormwater discharges throughout the City, including the project site. Therefore, by complying with the MS4 Permit, the project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, and impacts are less than significant.
b. Less than significant impact. Currently, there are no irrigation water rights from a local water district associated with the project site. Potable water for the site would be supplied by the City of Bakersfield (the District) which has provided a Verification of Services letter for the project, which receives at least a portion of its supplies from groundwater sources. Also, by state law, the current Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) does not need to address the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) or sustainable groundwater management at this time. It was concluded that the District has sufficient existing capacity to service the project. Therefore, the project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level, and impacts are less than significant. c. Less than significant impact. The following responses to items X.d. through X.g. discuss whether the project would substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces.

Therefore, the project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or through the addition of impervious surfaces, and impacts are less than significant. d. Less than significant impact. The project site does not contain any blue-line streams or other surface water features; therefore, the proposed development would not alter the course of a river or stream.

The site would be graded and, as a result, the internal drainage pattern would be altered from the baseline condition. Additionally, the project would increase impervious surfaces on-site (i.e., building pads, sidewalks, asphalt parking area, etc.), which would reduce the percolation of water into the ground and result in greater amounts of stormwater runoff concentrations. If uncontrolled, differences in drainage patterns and increased impervious surfaces could result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. However, the project would be required to comply with the General Permit during construction and the MS4 Permit during operation. To comply with the MS4 Permit, the City requires compliance with adopted building codes, including complying with an approved drainage plan that avoids on- and off-site flooding, erosion, and siltation problems. Therefore, the project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site, and impacts are less than significant. e. Less than significant impact. Please refer to response X.d. The project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, the project’s impacts are less than significant. f. Less than significant impact. To comply with the City’s MS4 Permit, the City requires compliance with an approved drainage plan that would avoid on- and off-site flooding. The project would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned I:,

BAKERSFIELD
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 30 of 44

stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, and impacts are less than significant.
g. Less than significant impact. A review of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Flood Insurance Maps shows the project site is in Zone X, which is a minimal risk area outside the 1-percent and 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain. Therefore, the project would not impede or redirect flood flows, and impacts are less than significant. h. Less than significant impact. The City of Bakersfield is located within Central California and is not near a coastal environment that risks flood inundation. In addition, the City is not located within a tsunami zone as identified by the California Department of Conservation’s Tsunami Map. As mentioned above, the project site is in Zone X, which is a minimal-risk area outside the 1-percent and 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain.

The project site, like most of the City, is located within the Lake Isabella flood inundation area (Kern County 2017), which is the area that would experience flooding if there was a catastrophic failure of the Lake Isabella Dam. There is an approved Lake Isabella Dam Failure Evacuation Plan (Kern County 2009) that establishes processes and procedures for the mass evacuation and short-term support of populations at risk below the Lake Isabella Dam. The City would utilize the Evacuation Plan to support its Emergency Operations Plans. Therefore, due to the project’s location and implementation of related emergency safety plans, the project would not likely risk the release of pollutants due to project inundation in flood hazards, tsunami, or seiche zones, and impacts are less than significant.
i. Less than significant impact. Please refer to response X.d. There is currently no adopted groundwater management plan for the project site or surrounding area. Therefore, the project would not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan, and impacts are less than significant.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project:
a. Physically divide an established community?
b. Cause a significant environmental impact due to a
conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
Discussion
a. No impact. The project is a continuation of the existing urban development pattern of the City.

The project does not include a long and linear feature, such as a freeway, railroad track, block wall, etc., that would have the potential to divide a community. The propose project is the development of a 191-unit multifamily residential complex on 11.22-acre infill site that does not impede existing or future movement or development of the City. The proposed project is I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□ □ □
□ □ □
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 31 of 44

consistent with the gaols and policies of the Bakersfield General Plan and state mandates for the increase of residential housing.
b. No impact. The proposed project requested an amendment to the zoning ordinance changing the parcel zone from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-4 (High Density Multi-Unit Dwelling) in order to increase the residential density which is consistent with both the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan (MBGP) and Zoning Ordinance. The project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
Discussion
a. No impact. The project site is not within the administrative boundaries of an oilfield and there are no oil wells found on the site (DOC 2022b). Therefore, the project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state.
b. No impact. The project site is currently designated R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development). No portion of the site is designated for potential mineral resource extraction use such as R-MP (Mineral and Petroleum). Therefore, the project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site that is delineated in a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XIII. NOISE: Would the project result in:
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
I:,

b. Generation of excessive ground borne vibration or
ground borne noise levels?
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people
residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels?
Discussion
a. Less than significant impact. The project would generate both short-term construction noise and operational noise. The first type of short-term construction noise would result from the transport of construction equipment and materials to the project site, as well as construction worker commutes. The total daily vehicle trips resulting from construction worker commutes would be minimal when compared to existing traffic volumes on the affected streets, and the long-term noise level change would not be perceptible.

The second type of short-term construction noise is related to noise generated during project construction. The site preparation and grading phase, which includes excavation and grading, tends to generate the highest noise levels because earthmoving equipment is the noisiest construction equipment. Construction noise levels during grading would be less than 70 dBA, which would not exceed the hourly noise level standard for the nearest sensitive uses.

Construction noise would cease to occur once project construction is completed. The project will also be required to comply with the construction hours specified in the City Noise Ordinance, which states that construction activities are limited to the hours of 6:00 AM and 9:00 PM on weekdays, and between the hours of 8:00 AM and 9:00 PM on weekends.

Project operations would generate sound levels typical of multi-family housing land uses, which would have to comply with the Bakersfield Municipal Code regarding noise. Stationary operational noise levels at all points around the project site would experience noise level impacts that would be less than the daytime and nighttime hourly noise level standards of 55 dBA and 50 dBA, respectively. Project-related operational traffic would have very small noise level increases along roadway segments in the project vicinity. Parking lot noise, including engine sounds, car doors slamming, car alarms, loud music, and people conversing, would also occur at the project site. It was determined that the noise levels at all points around the project site would experience noise level impacts that would be less than the City’s daytime and nighttime maximum noise level standards of 75 dBA and 70 dBA.

Therefore, the project would not generate a substantial, temporary, or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project that are in excess of the standards established in the local General Plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies, and impacts are less than significant.
b. Less than significant impact. Some ground-borne vibration and noise would originate from earth movement and building activities during the project’s construction phase. Ground-borne noise and vibration from construction activity would be mostly low to moderate. The operation of typical construction equipment would generate ground-borne vibrations that would not exceed guidelines that are considered unsafe for any type of building. Operation of the proposed multifamily housing use would not generate ground-borne vibration. Therefore, the project would not I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□ □ □
□ □ □
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 33 of 44

result in the generation of excessive ground-borne vibrations or ground-borne noise, and impacts are less than significant.
c. No impact. The project site is not located within the Kern County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan area or the vicinity of a private airstrip (Kern County 2012). Therefore, the project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project result in:
a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
Discussion
a. Less than significant impact. The proposed project would accommodate population growth in this area through the development of a new 191-unit apartment complex. The project will be developed adjacent to existing established residential and commercial uses and is therefore the logical extension of existing urban development. Bakersfield has experienced approximately 13% growth in population (347,483 people in 2010 to 394,328 in 2019) since 2010 (DOF 2019a and DOF 2019b). It is predicted that by 2040, 1,137,676 people will live in Kern County (DOF 2019c). Given that 42.5% of the people in Kern County currently live in Bakersfield (DOF 2019b), and if this trend continues, it is estimated that about 483,512 people would live in Bakersfield in 2040. This means that by 2040, 81,951 additional people would need housing in the Bakersfield area. This Project will be in compliance with the goals and policies of the City of Bakersfield Housing Element and the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan and will accommodate the orderly development projected increase in Bakersfield’s population by providing residences for existing and future residents in Bakersfield. Therefore, the project would not induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly, and impacts are less than significant. b. No impact. The project site consists of two, large undeveloped parcels of land. The project would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□ □ □
□ □ □
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 34 of 44

XV. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the project result in:
a. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or
other performance objectives for any of the public
services:
i. Fire protection?
ii. Police protection?
iii. Schools?
iv. Parks?
v. Other public facilities?
Discussion
a. The following discusses whether the project would result in substantial adverse physical impacts to public services. The need for additional public service is generally directly correlated to population growth and the resultant additional population’s need for services beyond what is currently available.
i. Less than significant impact. Fire protection services for the Metropolitan Bakersfield area are provided through a joint fire protection agreement between the City and County of Kern. A potential increase in services can be paid for via property taxes generated by this development. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, to maintain acceptable service ratios, or response times or other performance objectives for fire protection, and impacts are less than significant.
ii. Less than significant impact. Police protection for the project would be provided by the Bakersfield Police Department. Potential increases in services can be paid for via property taxes generated by this development. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. In order to maintain acceptable service ratios, or response times or other performance objectives for police protection, and impacts are less than significant.
iii. Less than significant impact. The project is proposed to accommodate existing and future residents within the City. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 35 of 44

of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools, and impacts are less than significant.
iv. Less than significant impact. The proposal does not include nor require the construction of recreational facilities. However, park impact fees are required for residential and High Medium Residential land uses. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks, and impacts are less than significant.
v. Less-than-significant impact. The Project and eventual buildup of this area would result in an increase in maintenance responsibility for the City. Though the Project may necessitate increased maintenance for other public facilities, this potential increase can be paid for by property taxes generated by this development. Therefore, the Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for other public facilities, and impacts are less than significant.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVI. RECREATION: Would the project result in:
a. Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
Discussion
a. Less-than-significant impact. Please refer to response XV.a.iv. Although the project would increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated, park impact fees shall allow the City to upgrade, improve or rehabilitate an existing or proposed public park to better serve the public, and impacts are less than significant. b. No impact. Please refer to response XV.a.iv. The project would not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment.

I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□ □ □
□ □ □
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 36 of 44

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVII. TRANSPORTATION: Would the project result in:
a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
b. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines §
15064.3, subdivision (b)?
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
d. Result in inadequate emergency access?
Discussion
a. Less-than-significant impact. The Project would result in temporary construction-related traffic impacts. Construction workers traveling to and from the project site as well as construction material delivery would result in additional vehicle trips to the area’s roadway system.

Construction material delivery may require a number of trips for oversized vehicles that may travel at slower speeds than existing traffic and, due to their size, may intrude into adjacent travel lanes.

These trips may temporarily degrade level of service on area roadways and at intersections.

Additionally, the total number of vehicle trips associated with all construction- related traffic, including construction worker trips, could temporarily increase daily traffic volumes on local roadways and intersections. The Project may require temporary lane closures or the need for flagmen to safely direct traffic on roadways near the Project site.

A Trip Generation Analysis was completed and reviewed by the Traffic Engineering Division of the Public Works Department (McIntosh & Associates New Gen Group, 2025). It was determined that the Project has been designed in accordance with City development standards, and appropriate standard conditions of approval have been assigned to the project. The conditions include the dedication and improvement of streets, traffic control measures during construction, pedestrian access, and the payment of impact fees. Therefore, the project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system and impacts are less than significant. b. Less-than-significant impact. Section 15064.3 of the updated California Code of Regulations (“CCR” or CEQA Guidelines), the statewide application came into effect on July 1, 2020. This CCR Section 15064.3(b) states:

Criteria for Analyzing Transportation Impacts.
(1) Land Use Projects. Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) exceeding an applicable threshold of significance may indicate a significant impact. Generally, projects within onehalf mile of either an existing major transit stop or a stop along an existing highquality transit corridor should be presumed to cause a less than significant I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 37 of 44

transportation impact. Projects that decrease VMT in the project area compared to existing conditions should be presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact.
(2) Transportation Projects. Transportation projects that reduce, or have no impact on, VMT should be presumed to cause a less than significant transportation impact. For roadway capacity projects, agencies have the discretion to determine the appropriate measure of transportation impact consistent with CEQA and other applicable requirements. To the extent that such impacts have already been adequately addressed at a programmatic level, such as in a regional transportation plan EIR, a lead agency may tier from that analysis as provided in Section 15152.
(3) Qualitative Analysis. If existing models or methods are not available to estimate the VMT for the project being considered, a lead agency may analyze the project's VMT qualitatively. Such a qualitative analysis would evaluate factors such as the availability of transit, proximity to other destinations, etc. For many projects, a qualitative analysis of construction traffic may be appropriate. (4) Methodology. A lead agency has the discretion to choose the most appropriate methodology to evaluate a project's VMT, including whether to express the change in absolute terms, per capita, per household, or in any other measure. A lead agency may use models to estimate a project's VMT and may revise those estimates to reflect professional judgment based on substantial evidence. Any assumptions used to estimate VMT and any revisions to model outputs should be documented and explained in the environmental document prepared for the project. The standard of adequacy in Section 15151 shall apply to the analysis described in this section.

The Kern Council of Governments (Kern COG) Travel Demand Model was used to estimate regional Vehicle Miles Traveled (“VMT”) with and without project conditions to determine if the project will have a significant VMT impact. Total regional VMT with and without project conditions was calculated, and is shown in the following table:
2020 Project City of Bakersfield
Threshold* Difference % Difference
VMT per
capita 4.89 9.76 4.87 49%
The total regional VMT with project traffic is lower than the total without the project. Therefore, the project would not be in conflict or be inconsistent with CCR Section 15064.3(b) and impacts are less than significant.
c. Less-than-significant impact. The project would have to comply with all conditions placed on it by the City Traffic Engineering Division to meet accepted traffic engineering standards intended to reduce traffic hazards. The project is within City limits and surrounded by compatible existing and planned land uses and land use designations. Therefore, the project would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses, and impacts are less than significant.

I:,

BAKERSFIELD
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 38 of 44

d. Less-than-significant impact. There is the potential that, during the construction phase, the project would impede emergency access. For projects that require minor impediments of short duration (e.g., pouring a new driveway entrance), the project would be required to obtain a street permit from the Public Works Department. If a project requires lane closures and/or the diversion of traffic, then a Traffic Control Plan, subject to Public Works approval, would be required. During operations, the project would have to comply with all applicable City policies and requirements to ensure adequate emergency access. Therefore, the need for such permits is determined by the Public Works Department during the permitting and construction phases, and impacts are less than significant.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project result in:

Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code § 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k)?
b. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code § 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code §
5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe?
Discussion
a. Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. The project requires a Zone Change and therefore, request for consultation letters were sent to a list of tribal contacts received from the Native American Heritage Commission in compliance with Senate Bill 18 (“SB 18”). In the letters, the City stated that the applicable tribes may request consultation with the City regarding the preservation of, and/or mitigation of impacts to, California Native American cultural places in connection with the project. To date, none of the tribes have responded to the request. Therefore, the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources or in a local register of historical resources, and impacts are less than significant. b. Less than significant impact. There are no tribal cultural resources determined by the lead agency to be of significance onsite. Therefore, the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is determined by the lead agency to be significant, and impacts are less than significant.

I:,

BAKERSFIELD
□ □ □
□ □ □
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 39 of 44

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVIV. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project result in:
a. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development
during normal, dry, and multiple dry years?
c. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s Projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
d. Generate solid waste in excess of state or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
e. Comply with federal, state, and local management
and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Discussion
a. Less-than-significant impact. The project would require the construction of new water, stormwater drainage, sewer facilities; above and/or belowground electrical facilities, natural gas facilities, and telecommunications (e.g., cable, fiber optics, phone, etc.) typical of general manufacturing development. Water, stormwater, and sewer structures would have to be designed to meet the City’s Current Subdivision & Engineering Design Manual (Bakersfield 1999). Compliance with the Design Manual would ensure that the facilities would not result in significant environmental effects.

Electrical, natural gas and telecommunications facilities would be placed by the individual serving utilities; these entities already have in place safety and citing protocols to ensure that placement of new utilities to serve new construction would not have a significant effect on the environment.

Therefore, the project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects, and impacts are less than significant. b. Less-than-significant impact. The designated water purveyor is the City of Bakersfield (“the District”). The District has provided a verification of water letter. Therefore, the project has sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years, and impacts are less than significant.

I:,

c. Less-than-significant impact. Wastewater produced as a result of the project would be treated at the Waste Water Treatment Plant (“WWTP”) No. 2, which is owned and operated by the City.

WWTP No. 2 has an overall capacity of 25 MGD and a current available capacity of 13.7 MGD (Bakersfield 2023). WWTP No. 2 has sufficient capacity to serve the project. Therefore, it has been determined that the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments, and impacts are less than significant.
d. Less-than-significant impact. It is assumed that solid waste generated because of the project would be disposed of at the Bena Landfill located at 2951 Neumarkel Road, Bakersfield, CA 93307.

By City standards which are designed to achieve state waste stream reduction and recycling goals, the Solid Waste Division of Public Works will conduct a detailed review of the facility at the time of development to incorporate appropriate on-site trash facilities, subject to City approval.

Therefore, the project would be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs, and impacts are less than significant. e. Less-than-significant impact. By law, the project would be required to comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations, including those relating to waste reduction, litter control, and solid waste disposal, and impacts are less than significant.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XX. WILDFIRES: Would the project result in:
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
d. Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a
result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
Discussion
a. Less than significant impact. The project is not located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. The project is in an urbanized area and access to the site would be maintained throughout the construction period. The project would not interfere with any local or regional emergency response or evacuation plans because the project would not result in substantial alteration to the adjacent and area circulation system. The project is I:,

typical of urban development in Bakersfield and is not inconsistent with the adopted City of Bakersfield Hazardous Materials Area Plan (Bakersfield 1997). This plan identifies responsibilities and provides coordination of emergency response at the local level to hazardous materials incidents.

Therefore, the project would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and impacts are less than significant. b. Less than significant impact. As mentioned above, the project is not located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. Additionally, the project site is relatively flat, not near wildlands, the site and its surroundings do not possess high fuel loads (i.e., lots of vegetation and other burnable material) to exacerbate wildfire risks, and therefore, fire-related pollutant concentrations. Therefore, the project would not exacerbate wildfires and expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, and impacts are less than significant.
c. Less than significant impact. The project is located within the Bakersfield City limits and the site, as well as the surrounding area, is extensively developed with existing infrastructure such as roads, power lines, utilities, etc., to support the development of this project. Therefore, the project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment, and impacts are less than significant. d. Less than significant impact. The project site is relatively flat, is not within a floodplain, and is not in a moderate-risk to high-risk area for wildfires. Therefore, the project would not expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides because of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes, and impacts are less than significant.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: Would the project result in:
a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of life of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental effects of a
Project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current Projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
I:,

Discussion
a. Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. The project, with the implementation of the identified conditions of approval, best management practices, and mitigation measures, would not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, and impacts are less than significant with mitigation incorporated. b. Less than significant impact. Under Section 15065(a)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, a lead agency shall find that a project may have a significant effect on the environment where there is substantial evidence that said project has potential environmental effects “that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.” This section further states that cumulatively considerable means “that the incremental effects of an individual project are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.”
Past, present, and future projects in proximity to the project were considered and evaluated as part of this Initial Study. Also, in addition to project-specific impacts, this Initial Study considered the project’s potential for incremental effects that are cumulatively considerable. As described in the responses above, there is no substantial evidence that there are cumulative effects associated with this project. In addition, any future development projects not identified above would be required to undergo a separate environmental analysis and mitigate any projectspecific or site-specific potential impacts, and impacts are less than significant. c. Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. As described in the responses above, the project, with mitigation, would not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, and impacts are less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

I:,

BAKERSFIELD
Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 43 of 44

REFERENCE LIST
Bakersfield (City of Bakersfield). 1997. Hazardous Materials Area Plan. January.

Bakersfield. 1999. Proposed Subdivision & Engineering Design Manual. June.

Available: < https://www.bakersfieldcity.us/943/Subdivision-Engineering-Design-Manual > Accessed: June 16, 2025.

Bakersfield. 2023. Wastewater Treatment Plants. Available:
<http://www.bakersfieldcity.us/gov/depts/public_works/sewer/wastewater_treatment_plants.htm>.

Accessed: June 20, 2025.

CalEPA (California Environmental Protection Agency). 2023. Cortese List Data Resources. Available:
<https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/>. Accessed: June 20, 2025 CalFire (Department of Forestry and Fire Protection). 2022. Fire Hazard Severity Zones Maps.

Available: < https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/divisions/community-wildfire-preparedness-andmitigation/wildland-hazards-building-codes/fire-hazard-severity-zones-maps/ >.

Accessed: June 25, 2025.

Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 2022. California State Scenic Highway Mapping System. Available:<
https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116f1a acaa>. Accessed: June 25, 2025.

CBOC (California Burrowing Owl Consortium). 1993. Burrowing Owl Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines.

April.

City of Bakersfield Water District. 2025. Verification of Water Services letter. May.

CVRWQCB. 2016. Order No. R5-2016-0040, NPDES No. CAS0085324, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements General Permit for Discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems.

Available:<https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/board_decisions/adopted_orders/general_ orders/r5-2016-0040_ms4.pdf>. Accessed: June 21, 2025.

Department of Conservation (DOC). 2022a. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program.

Available:< https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp >. Accessed: June 24, 2025.

Department of Conservation (DOC). 2022b. Well Finder CalGEM GIS.

Available: < https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp>. Accessed: June 24, 2025.

DTSC (Department of Toxic Substance Control). 2023. EnviroStor.

Available:<https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/>. Accessed: June 19, 2025.

Findlaw. 2015. Center for Biological Diversity v. The Newhall Land and Farming Company, Real Party in Interest. Available: < https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ca-supreme-court/1719578.html >.

Accessed: June 19, 2025.

Hudlow Cultural Resource Associates. 2023. Hudlow Phase I Cultural Resource Survey. September.

Environmental Checklist and Analysis
S:\03_Advance Planning\02_ZC Only\2025\PP-ZC-25-0001_R-2PUD to R-4\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC 25-0001 rpn edits.docxx Page 44 of 44

Kern County. 2009. Lake Isabella Dam Failure Evacuation Plan. Available:< https://kerncountyfire.org/jsp-uploads/Isabella-Dam-Failure-Plan.pdf >. Accessed: June 24, 2025.

Kern County. 2012. Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. November.

Kern County. 2017. Lake Isabella Flood Area. Available:< https://kernpublicworks.com/building-andcode/floodplain-management/lake-isabella-flood-area/>. Accessed: June 24, 2025.

McIntosh & Associates New Gen Group. 2025. Traffic Analysis. May.

Pruett Biological Resource Consulting, Inc. 2021. Biological Resource Evaluation. July.

SJVAPCD (San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District). 2015. Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts. March.

South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2014. Final Negative Declaration For Phillips 66 Los Angeles Refinery Carson Plan – Crude Oil Storage Capacity Project. Available:
< http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/documents/permit-projects/2014/phillips-66- fnd.pdf >. Accessed: June 17, 2025.

Trinity Consultants. 2025. Small Project Analysis Level Assessment. August.

Pruett Biological Resource Consulting
8819 Latera Court, Bakersfield, California 93314
Phone: 661.421.0006. Email: [email protected] [email protected] 16 April 2025
New Gen Engineering Group, Inc.

Ms. Whitney Jackson
10800 Stockdale Highway, Suite 103
Bakersfield, California 93309
Ms. Jackson:

Pruett Biological Resource Consulting, Inc. (PruettBio) has prepared this letter to address a proposed Zone Change (ZC) of Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 390-300-29 and -30, totaling

11.22 gross acres (4.54 hectares)(project). The project proposes a Zone Change from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-4 (High Density Multi-Unit Dwelling). The request will accommodate future proposed 191 dwelling units with clubhouse from the previous approved 155 dwelling units with clubhouse. The project is located northeast of the intersection of Camino Media and Old River Road, within the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern southwest Bakersfield, County of Kern, California; Section 06, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian. The project is located within the geographic range of several federal-, and state-listed, threatened and/or endangered plant and animal taxa. Several non-listed, special-status species also have the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project.

A Biological Resource Evaluation was prepared by PruettBio for a proposed General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Zone Change (ZC) of Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 390-300-28, -29, and -30, totaling 12.63 gross acres (5.11 hectares)(project) from CO (Commercial Office) to R-2 (Medium Density Residential), report dtd. 06 July 2021. The July 2021 fieldwork was conducted, and the report was prepared in support California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements for the evaluation of potential impacts to listed or otherwise special-status species. The July 2021 evaluation captured the current proposed ZC. CEQA Appendix G thresholds were used to evaluate potential impacts to the biological resources from the proposed project development and satisfied the requirements for a GPA/ZC evaluation.

At the time of the July 2021 study, the project was within the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan (MBHCP). The field study was conducted in accordance with the Federal Endangered Species Act section 10(a)(1)(B) permit in effect and California Endangered Species Act incidental take permit (ITP) issued by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 2081(b)(ITP No. 2081-2013-058-04), for the MBHCP. Impacts to covered plant and animal species, other than blunt-nosed leopard lizard or bird species afforded protection under the MBTA, would have been fully-mitigated by participation in the MBHCP. The MBHCP ITP has expired and currently, no project specific permitting affording coverage for “take” of federally- or state-listed plants and animals exists. CDFW recommends consultation with the agencies for take avoidance of listed species. If avoidance is not feasible, acquisition of a projectspecific ITP is recommended prior to ground disturbing activities, pursuant to Fish and Game Code 2081(b) to comply with CESA. If additional consultation with the agencies results in the need for Application for a California Incidental Take Permit, Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 783.2 outlines requirements for detailed species-specific take analysis, proposed measures to minimize and fully mitigate impacts, compliance monitoring, and funding.

Cover Letter
APN -390-300-29 and -30
April 2025
A project site visit was conducted by PruettBio on 03 April 2025. The findings of the July 2021 field study and corresponding report continue to accurately reflect the existing conditions of the project.

With the expiration of the MBHCP ITP, project-specific consultation is now required to fully comply with the Federal Endangered Species Act, the California Endangered Species Act, and CEQA.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions of require additional information.

Respectfully,
Steven P. Pruett, Principal Biologist

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE EVALUATION
Assessor’s Parcel Map No. 390-300-28, -29, and -30
County of Kern
Bakersfield, California
Prepared for:

RGF Properties LLC
9100 Ming Avenue, Suite 120
Bakersfield, California 93311
Prepared by:

Pruett Biological Resource Consulting
8613 Beaver Drive
Bakersfield, California 93312
661.421.0006
06 July 2021
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 463-160-55
June 2021

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pruett Biological Resource Consulting, Inc. (PruettBio) has prepared this biological resource evaluation for a proposed General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Zone Change (ZC) of Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 390-300-28, -29, and -30, totaling 12.63 gross acres (5.11 hectares)(project). The project is located northeast of the intersection of Camino Media and Old River Road, within the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern southwest Bakersfield, County of Kern, California; Section 06, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian. The project is located within the geographic range of several federal-, and state-listed, threatened and/or endangered plant and animal taxa. Several non-listed, special-status species also have the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project.

The purpose of this report is to document biological resources identified during a reconnaissance-level field study of the project site and include potential biological resources identified during a literature review of the site and vicinity, identify potential impacts to biological resources resulting from the project, and to recommend avoidance and minimization measures for implementation prior to and during project activities. A literature review was conducted of the site and vicinity, prior to the field study, of the biological resources known to occur based on recorded, direct observation, or potentially occurring in the project impact area based on current or historical habitat conditions. During the field study, existing habitat conditions, direct observations and/or species sign was recorded to assess the potential for occurrence of special-status species. This report includes an evaluation of the potential for those specialstatus biological resources not observed during the field study, with the potential to occur on the property based on the habitat conditions observed.

The project is in southwest Bakersfield in an area historically farmed. Urban development has increased along the margins of Metropolitan Bakersfield in the past 50 years and has resulted in the conversion of farmland to residential and commercial properties. The project site consists of about 10-acres of vacant land with the remainder maintained and landscaped in Eucalyptus sp. The project site is surrounded by commercial development and the California State University, Bakersfield, campus. No undisturbed, native, or recovering habitat is present on the site or adjacent parcels.

The literature review and database queries yielded 21 special-status plant species and 32 special-status animal species as potentially occurring within the vicinity of the project site. Of these, 5 plant species, and 16 animal species have federal-, and/or state-listed and are afforded protection under federal or state law.

The project will not conflict with existing or adopted Habitat Conservation Plans, Natural Community Conservation Plans, local or regional conservation plans, or local ordinances protecting biological resources. The project is within the Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan (MBHCP). The field study was conducted in accordance with the Federal Endangered Species Act section 10(a)(1)(B) permit and California Endangered Species Act incidental take permit (ITP) issued by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 2081(b)(ITP No. 2081-2013- 058-04), for the MBHCP. Evaluation of potential impacts to plant and animal species are required under federal and state regulation during a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Appendix G thresholds have been used to evaluate potential impacts to the biological resources from the proposed project development.

Impacts to covered plant and animal species, other than blunt-nosed leopard lizard or bird species afforded protection under the MBTA, would be fully-mitigated by participation in the MBHCP.

Recommendations included in this report when implemented in concert with the MBHCP, would be expected to mitigate any project impacts to biological resources to a less-than-significant level.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 392-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................................1 PROJECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT SETTING AND PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION....................................................................................................... 1 METHODS.............................................................................................................................................................2 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................................................................ 2 FIELD STUDY ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 RESULTS ...............................................................................................................................................................3 VEGETATION COMMUNITIES AND LAND COVER...................................................................................................... 3 SOILS ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.......................................................................................................................................... 3 Special-Status Plant Species................................................................................................................................ 3 Special-Status Animal Species ............................................................................................................................. 4 Designated Critical Habitat ................................................................................................................................. 4 Jurisdictional Water Resource Features .............................................................................................................. 4 Special-Status Natural Communities................................................................................................................... 5 Wildlife Migration Corridors and Nursery Sites................................................................................................... 5 Regional and Local Policies.................................................................................................................................. 5 IMPACT ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES .......................................................................5 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................................................................8 APPENDIX A .......................................................................................................................................................11 PROJECT VICINTY AND SITE ................................................................................................................................11 APPENDIX B........................................................................................................................................................17 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT AND ANIMAL EVALUATION...........................................................................................17 APPENDIX C........................................................................................................................................................31 PLANTS AND ANIMALS OBSERVED ON THE PROJECT ..........................................................................................31 Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 392-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
1 INTRODUCTION
Pruett Biological Resource Consulting, Inc. (PruettBio) has prepared this biological resource evaluation for the proposed development of APN 390-300-28, -29, and -30, within the City of Bakersfield. The report documents biological resources identified during fieldwork conducted on the project site and those identified through a literature search as potentially occurring based on known observations or historic habitat conditions. The report uses the information collected during the field study and literature search to evaluate potential impacts to biological resources, resulting from the project. The report is intended to assist in the analysis of the proposed project for a GPA and ZC.

Listed plant and animal species are protected under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). Protection of other non-listed, special-status species is afforded under additional regulation including the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) impacts to non-listed, special-status species must be evaluated. Where necessary, the report recommends avoidance and minimization measures for implementation prior to and during project activities. The report is intended to provide technical information in support of a CEQA preliminary review. For the purposes of this report, potential impacts to the biological resources of the proposed project were evaluated in accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines (2021).

PROJECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The project site consists of 12.63 gross acres (5.11 hectares) of APN 390-300-28, -29, and -30. The project site is located northeast of the intersection of Camino Media and Old River Road, in the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern. The project site is in Section 06, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian. The project proposes a Zone Change and corresponding General Plan Amendment from CO (Commercial Office) to R-2 (Medium Density Residential).

PROJECT SETTING AND PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
The project site is in the southern San Joaquin Valley; a broad, treeless plain in the rain shadow of the Inner Coast Ranges. The region’s climate can be characterized as Mediterranean; with hot, dry summers and cool, moist winters. Summer high temperatures typically exceed 100 °Fahrenheit (°F); with an average of 110 days per year over 90 °F. Winter temperatures in the San Joaquin Valley are mild, with an average of only 16 days per year with frost (Twisselmann 1967).

Rainfall varies, increasing from west to east, with the west side of the valley receiving an average of around 4 inches (10 centimeters) per year and the east side averaging about 6 inches (15 centimeters) per year. Winter fog, called Tule fog, sometimes forms during the months of November, December, and January, supplementing the annual precipitation. Approximately 90% of the rainfall in the region occurs between November 1 and April 1. Drought cycles occur periodically, becoming severe enough that plant and animal populations can experience large fluctuations. The vegetation communities in the San Joaquin Valley are distinguishable from the Mojave Desert to the east due to Tule fog, higher humidity, and isolation from continental climatic influences by mountain ranges (Twisselmann 1967).

The general topography of the area slopes very subtly south with the project generally flat at about 370 feet (113 meters) above mean sea level. The project and vicinity have been historically farmed for decades. The project site was under almond production at the time of the field study. The project site is surrounded by mixed use residential, agricultural, and commercial development with scattered oil production. No undisturbed, native, or recovering habitat is present on the project site or adjacent parcels.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 392-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
2 METHODS

LITERATURE REVIEW
PruettBio conducted a literature review to identify known observations and potential for listed, or otherwise special-status, species to occur in the vicinity of the project site. A standard, 10-mile (16- kilometer) radius query was performed. Database records reviewed included:
• United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) iPac: The iPac report generates a list of federal-listed species and other resources under the jurisdiction of the USFWS, including designated critical habitat for listed species, National Wildlife Refuge lands, and Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory. The list includes resources that are outside of the project site, but that have the potential to be impacted by project activities. • USFWS National Wetlands Inventory: The Wetlands Mapper is an online inventory integrating digital map data and other resources to provide current information regarding the status of national wetlands, riparian, and deepwater habitats.
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) WebSoil Survey: The report is an online database providing soil data produced by the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the USDA and other federal, state, and local agencies. The information drawn for the Soil Survey of Kern County, California, Northwestern Part was originally drawn from fieldwork completed in 1981 with soil names and descriptions approved in 1982. • California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB-RareFind 5): The CNDDB is a database of listed, or otherwise special-status, plant and animal species and sensitive communities maintained by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The information queried for this report included a standard 10-mile radius of the project site. • California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants:

CNPS is a private, professional organization that maintains a database evaluating the current conservation status of California’s rare, threatened, and endangered plant species. The information queried for this report included a standard 10-mile radius of the project site. The list includes resources that are outside of the project site, but that have the potential to be impacted by project activities based on known historic or current habitat features.

FIELD STUDY
A reconnaissance-level, biological field study was conducted by Steven P. Pruett on 23 June 2021. The entire project site was surveyed by walking the entire project site on transects spaced at no greater than 100-foot intervals. The field study conducted, allowed for 100% visual coverage of the project site. Field notes included observations of all plant and wildlife species observed. Direct observations and/or species sign was recorded to assess the potential for occurrence. Land cover types and general habitat conditions were recorded and photographed. Special-status species and habitat features, such as vegetation communities or ephemeral channels, were also recorded and photographed if observed.

Coordinates for important biological resource elements and direct observations of special-status species were recorded using a handheld geographic positioning system unit. If observed, San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF) dens were classified as defined by the USFWS Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance (2011). All plant taxa encountered were identified to the extent possible given the diagnostic features present. Identifications were made using keys contained in The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California and online updates containing revisions to taxonomic treatments (Baldwin et al. 2012; Jepson Flora Project 2015).

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 392-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
3 RESULTS
This section summarizes the results of the field study conducted on the project site and evaluates those results for the known or potential for occurrence of special-status species based on the literature review and database queries and pursuant to statutory regulation. Discussions are provided describing the existing habitat conditions including vegetation communities, land cover and current use; soils; specialstatus biological resources potentially occurring in the vicinity of the project site; the potential for jurisdictional resources including designated critical habitat and riparian/wetland/water resource features; the potential for wildlife migration corridors and nursery sites; and regional and local policy.

VEGETATION COMMUNITIES AND LAND COVER
The project site is located at the northwest edge of urban development of Metropolitan Bakersfield.

Before conversion to farmland, the original vegetive communities of the project site were Non-native Grassland (Holland 42200) and Valley Saltbush Scrub (Holland 36220). No undisturbed, native, or recovering habitat is present on the project site, adjacent parcels, or general vicinity of the project. The project site and surrounding area have been intensively farmed for decades. Urban development has increased along the margins of Metropolitan Bakersfield in the past 50 years and has resulted in the conversion of farmland to residential and commercial properties. The project site was under grain production at the time of the field study. No undisturbed, native, or recovering habitat is present on the site or adjacent parcels. The potential for any native herbaceous species is extremely low due to ongoing disturbance. The project site farm roads and margins are dominated by ruderal/invasive plant species.

SOILS
The USGS soil survey map describes the soil of the project site as Unit 243, Wasco sandy loam). Unit 243 is alluvium derived from mixed rock sources found on alluvial fans and flood plains. It is comprised of sandy loam, loamy sand, and sand to a depth of about 62 inches. The depth to the restrictive feature is more than 80 inches and the available water storage in profile is listed as low (about 6.4 inches).

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
The literature review and database queries yielded 21 special-status plant species as potentially occurring within the vicinity of the project site. Thirty-two animal species were identified as potentially occurring in the region of the project site. Evidence of one (01) listed animal species, San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica, SJKF) was observed during the field study. No evidence of any other listed, or otherwise special-status plant or animal species, or animal species sign was observed during the field study. The evaluation of special-status species that were found during the literature review with a potential to occur in the region are included in Appendix B.

Special-Status Plant Species
Special-status plant species considered in this evaluation include all plant species that meet one or more of the following criteria:
• Listed or proposed for listing as threatened or endangered under ESA or candidates for possible future listing as threatened or endangered under the ESA (50 CFR §17.12). • Listed or candidates for listing by the State of California as threatened or endangered under CESA (Fish and Game Code §2050 et seq.). A species, subspecies, or variety of plant is endangered when the prospects of its survival and reproduction in the wild are in immediate jeopardy from one or more causes, including loss of habitat, change in habitat, over-exploitation, predation, competition, disease, or other factors (Fish and Game Code §2062). A plant is threatened when it is likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future in the absence of special protection and management measures (Fish and Game Code §2067).

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 392-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
4 • Listed as rare under the California Native Plant Protection Act (Fish and Game Code §1900 et seq.). A plant is rare when, although not presently threatened with extinction, the species, subspecies, or variety is found in such small numbers throughout its range that it may be endangered if its environment worsens (Fish and Game Code §1901). • Meet the definition of rare or endangered under CEQA §15380(b) and (d). Species that may meet the definition of rare or endangered include the following:
o Species considered by the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) to be “rare, threatened or endangered in California” (Lists 1A, 1B and 2);
o Species that may warrant consideration on the basis of local significance or recent biological information.
o Some species included on the California Natural Diversity Database’s (CNDDB) Special Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List (California Department of Fish and Game 2008). • Considered a locally significant species, that is, a species that is not rare from a statewide perspective but is rare or uncommon in a local context such as within a county or region (CEQA §15125 (c)) or is so designated in local or regional plans, policies, or ordinances (CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G). Examples include a species at the outer limits of its known range or a species occurring on an uncommon soil type.

Precipitation has been well below average to date, resulting in a poor year for annual plant species observations. Of the 21 special-status plant species returned during database queries for the project vicinity, 5 species are either federally- or state-listed as threatened or endangered. Although CEQA requires consideration for impacts to locally significant plant species, no mitigation is legally required to compensate for impacts to non-listed plant species. No listed, or otherwise special-status plant species was observed during the fieldwork conducted for the preparation of this report. No listed, or otherwise special-status plant species, has been recorded as occurring within the project site. The potential for occurrence of any special-status plant species is unlikely due to decades of intensive farming.

Special-Status Animal Species
Special-status animal species considered in this evaluation include those that may occur in the project vicinity that have statutory protections. This includes federal- and state-listed (rare, threatened, or endangered; fully protected) species and candidates for listing under the respective endangered species acts. Species that are of special concern to the CDFW or the USFWS are included in this evaluation.

Special-status bird species that are afforded protection under the MBTA which may nest on or within an approximate 10-mile (16-kilometer) radius of the project site are also evaluated. Evidence of one (01) listed animal species, San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica, SJKF) was observed during the field study. No evidence of any other listed, or otherwise special-status animal species, or animal species sign was observed during the field study
Designated Critical Habitat
The USFWS iPac report and USFWS Designated Critical Habitat Mapper lists no Designated Critical Habitat (USFWS 2020). Designated Critical Habitats closest to the project site include California condor (Gymnogyps californianus) approximately 22-miles south and Buena Vista Lake shrew (Sorex ornatus relictus) west of the project site. No suitable habitat for either species exists on the project site.

Jurisdictional Water Resource Features
Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates discharge of dredged and fill material into Waters of the United States. Wetlands are included under this jurisdiction. Proposed activities that may result in discharge of material into Waters of the U.S. require a permit review process by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as set forth under CWA section 404(b)(1). Fish and Game Code section 1602 Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 392-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
5 requires any person, state or local governmental agency, or public utility to notify CDFW before beginning any activity that will substantially modify a river, stream, or lake.

A search of the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory resulted in no riparian, wetlands, or other jurisdictional water features mapped on the project site (USFWS 2021). These results are consistent with the observed conditions within the survey area.

Special-Status Natural Communities
No special-status vegetation communities on the project site were identified by the USFWS iPac query, the CNDDB, or the CNPS Inventory (USFWS 2021, CDFW 2021, CNPS 2021). These results are consistent with the observed conditions within the survey area.

Wildlife Migration Corridors and Nursery Sites
Wildlife corridors can be defined as connections between wildlife blocks that meet specific habitat needs for species movement generally during migratory periods but seasonally as well. Wildlife corridors generally contain habitat dissimilar to the surrounding vicinity and include examples such as riparian areas along rivers and streams, washes, canyons, or otherwise undisturbed areas within urbanization.

Corridor width requirements can vary based on the needs of the species utilizing them. Development of the project would not impact wildlife migration corridors or nursery sites.

Regional and Local Policies
The proposed, modified project will not conflict with existing or adopted Habitat Conservation Plans, Natural Community Conservation Plans, local or regional conservation plans, or local ordinances protecting biological resources. The project site is located within the MBHCP, CDFW, ITP boundaries.

Recommendations included in this report when implemented in concert with the MBHCP, would be expected to mitigate any project impacts to biological resources to a less-than-significant level.

IMPACT ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES
This section provides an analysis of the impacts of the proposed, modified project following the standards of CEQA and provides recommendations that, when implemented, would reduce impacts to less-thansignificant levels. It is important to note that potential take of any federal- or state-listed species from project activities would require contacting the appropriate wildlife agency (the USFWS and/or the CDFW).

This contact may result in a requirement to obtain federal and/or state take authority for listed species as necessary.

The project site is located within the MBHCP ITP boundaries. Impacts to covered plant and animal species, other than blunt-nosed leopard lizard or bird species afforded protection under the MBTA, would be fully-mitigated by participation in the MBHCP. Recommendations included in this report when implemented in concert with the MBHCP, would be expected to mitigate any project impacts to biological resources to a less-than-significant level.

CEQA Appendix G thresholds have been used to evaluate potential impacts to the biological resources from the proposed project. The project would create a significant impact to biological resources, based on the specifications in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, if the following were to occur:

1. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 392-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
6 2. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;

3. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means;

4. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites;

5. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance;

6. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.

The following analysis discusses potential impacts associated with the development of the project and provides recommendations where appropriate to further reduce potential impacts.

1. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, by the CDFW, or the USFWS? Direct and indirect impacts, in the form of “incidental take” of a threatened, endangered, or otherwise protected species, are not expected as a result of the development of the proposed project..

2. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations, or by the CDFW or the USFWS?
No riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or United States Fish and Wildlife Service exists on the project site. No adverse effect will occur as a result of the development of the proposed project and no mitigation measures are recommended.

3. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No features, identified in wetland categories, appear on the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory mapping (USFWS 2021) on the proposed, modified project site. No federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act were identified during the field study conducted for the preparation of this report. No substantial adverse effect will occur as a result of the development of the project. No mitigation measures are recommended.

4. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? No migratory wildlife corridors were identified during the literature search or field study. The SJKF known den identified on the project site, likely used during the pup rearing period, would be fully-mitigated by participation in the MBHCP. The project will not interfere substantially with the movement of any native fish of wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 392-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
7 of native wildlife nursery sites. The following recommendations are provided for the general protection of bird species that may occur on the project site or vicinity in compliance with the MBTA:

If ground-disturbing activities are planned during the nesting season for migratory birds that may nest on or near the site (generally February 1 through August 31), nesting bird surveys are recommended prior to the commencement of ground disturbance for project activities. If nesting birds are present, no new construction or ground disturbance should occur within an appropriate avoidance area for that species until young have fledged, unless otherwise approved and monitored by a qualified onsite biologist.

Appropriate avoidance should be determined by a qualified biologist. In general, minimum avoidance zones for active nests should be implemented as follows: 1) ground or low-shrub nesting non-raptors – 300 feet (91 meters); 2) burrowing owl – as appropriate based on nest location, existing surrounding activity, and evaluation of owl behavior. Coordination with CDFW may be warranted. 3) Sensitive raptors (e.g., prairie falcon, golden eagle) – 0.5 miles (0.8 kilometers); 3) other raptors – 500 feet (152 meters).

5. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? There are no biological resources on the site which are protected by local policies. Impacts from conflicts with local policies will not occur. No additional mitigation measures are recommended.

6. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.

The project does not conflict with any Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. No additional mitigation measures are recommended.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 392-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
8 REFERENCES
Baldwin, B. G., Goldman, D. H., Keil, D. J., Patterson, R., Rosatti, T. J., & Wilken, D. H. (Eds.). (2012).

The Jepson manual: Vascular plants of California (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1568 pp.

CDFG. (2009). Protocols for surveying and evaluating impacts to special status native plant populations and natural communities. Sacramento, CA: Author. 7 pp.

CDFG. (2012). Staff report on burrowing owl mitigation. Sacramento, CA: Author.

CNDDB. (2021). Occurrence for U.S. Geologic Survey 7.5 minute quadrangles. Sacramento, CA: CDFW California Endangered Species Act of 1970, C.F.G.C § 2050 et seq. (2021).

California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, 13 P.R.C. § 21000 et seq. (2021).

California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 Guidelines, 14 C.C.R. § 15000 et seq. (2021).

California Native Plant Society (CNPS). (2021). Inventory of rare and endangered plants (Online edition, v8-01a) 7.5 minute quadrangles and corresponding plant species accounts. Sacramento, CA: Author.

California Native Plant Protection Act of 1977, C.F.G.C § 1904 et seq. (2021).

Clean Water Act of 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (2014).

Dunn, J. L., & Alderfer, J., (Eds.). (2008). Field guide to the birds of western North America. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society. 447 pp.

Ehrlich, P. R., Dobkin, D. S., & Wheye, D. (1988). The birder’s handbook: A field guide to the natural history of North American birds. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, Inc. 785 pp.

Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq. (2021).

Harris, J. H., & Stearns, D. M. (1991). Population density, census methods, habitat relationships, and home range of the San Joaquin antelope squirrel, 1988–89. California Department of Fish and Game, Nongame Bird and Mammal Section, Report 91-02. Oakland, CA: CDFG. Retrieved from http://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=2953
Jennings, M. R., Hayes, M. P., & Metro Washington Park Zoo. (1994). Amphibian and reptile species of special concern in California (Final report to the California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Contract No. 8023). Rancho Cordova, CA: CDFG. 255 pp.

Jepson Flora project (Eds.). (2015). Jepson eFlora. Retrieved from http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html Luce, B. (2005). Eumops perotis: Western mastiff bat. In C. Chambers & M. Herder, (Eds.), Species accounts. Portland, OR: Western Bat Working Group. 5 pp. Retrieved from http://www.wbwg.org/speciesinfo/species_accounts/molossidae/eupe.pdf Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, 16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq. (2021).

Nafis, G. (2000–2020a). North American legless lizards - Anniella. A Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of California. Retrieved from http://www.californiaherps.com/lizards/pages/a.pulchra.html Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 392-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
9 Nafis, G. (2000–2020b). San Joaquin coachwhip – Coluber flagellum ruddocki. A Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of California. Retrieved from
http://www.californiaherps.com/snakes/pages/c.f.ruddocki.html Nafis, G. (2000–2020c). Blainville’s horned lizard – Phrynosoma blainvillii. A Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of California. Retrieved from http://www.californiaherps.com/lizards/pages/p.blainvillii.html Native Fish and Wildlife Endangered Species, 32 Fed. Reg. 4001 (Mar. 11, 1967). Retrieved from http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr18.pdf
Papenfuss, T. J., Parham, J. F. (2013). Four new species of California legless lizards (Anniella). Breviora 536, 1–17. Retrieved from
http://mczbase.mcz.harvard.edu/specimen_images/publications/Breviora_536.pdf Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, C.W.A. § Section 13000 et seq. (2021).

Reid, F. A. (2006). Mammals of North America (Peterson field guide). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. 579 pp.

Sherwin, R. (2005). Antrozous pallidus: Pallid bat. In D. A. Rambaldini, (Eds.). Species accounts.

Portland, OR: Western Bat Working Group. 5 pp. Retrieved from http://www.wbwg.org/speciesinfo/species_accounts/vespertilonidae/anpa.pdf Shuford, W. D., Gardali, T., (with Comrack, L.A.). (Eds.). (2008). California bird species of special concern: a ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Sacramento, CA: CDFG.

Stebbins, R. C. (1985). A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians (Peterson field guide), (2nd ed.).

Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. 336 pp.

Stebbins, R. C. (2003). A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians (Peterson field guide), (3rd ed.).

Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. 533 pp.

Twisselmann, E. C. (1967). A flora of Kern County, California. The Wasmann Journal of Biology, 25, 1– 395.

Uptain, C. E. (1989). Survey for Tipton kangaroo rats (Dipodomys nitratoides nitratoides) on the proposed Delano prison site, Kern County, California (Prepared for the California Department of Corrections).

Sacramento, CA: 11 pp.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). (1996). California condor recovery plan, third revision. Portland, OR: Author. 62 pp.

USFWS. (1998). Recovery plan for upland species of the San Joaquin Valley, California. Portland, OR:

Author. Retrieved from http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/980930a.pdf USFWS. (2011). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service standardized recommendations for protection of the endangered San Joaquin kit fox prior to or during ground disturbance. Sacramento, CA: Author. 9 pp.

Retrieved from http://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es/Survey-ProtocolsGuidelines/Documents/kitfox_standard_rec_2011.pdf USFWS. (2013). California condor recovery program population size and distribution, December 31, 2013 overview page. Retrieved from
http://www.fws.gov/uploadedFiles/Region_8/NWRS/Zone_1/Hopper_Mountain_Complex/Hopper_Mounta in/Sections/News/News_Items/PDFs/2013-12-31.pdf
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 392-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
10 USFWS. (2021a). Federal endangered and threatened species that may occur in or may be affected by project in the counties and/or USGS 7 ½ minute quads you requested: quadrangle [August]. Author.

Retrieved from http://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es_species/Lists/es_species_lists-form.cfm USFWS. (2021b). National Wetlands Inventory Website [August]. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved from http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/
Williams, D. F. (1980). Distribution and population status of the San Joaquin antelope squirrel and giant kangaroo rat. (Nongame Wildlife Investigation Final Report E-W-4). Sacramento, CA: CDFG. 48 pp.

Williams, D. F. (1986). Mammalian species of special concern in California (Prepared for the State of California, The Resources Agency Department of Fish and Game). Turlock, CA: CSUS. 112 pp. Retrieved from http://esrp.csustan.edu/resources/publications/pdf/mammalian_scc_ca_esrp5.pdf Zeiner, D. C., Laudenslayer, W. F., Jr., Mayer, K. E., & White, M., (Eds.). (1990a). California’s wildlife volume II birds (California Statewide Wildlife Habitat Relationships System). Sacramento, CA: CDFG.

Zeiner, D. C., Laudenslayer, W. F., Jr., Mayer, K. E., & White, M., (Eds.). (1990b). California’s wildlife volume III mammals (California Statewide Wildlife Habitat Relationships System). Sacramento, CA:

CDFG.

APPENDIX A

PROJECT VICINTY AND SITE
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 392-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
Figure A-1. Aerial photograph of the project and vicinity (Google Earth Pro 2021).

Bakersfield
Project Site
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 392-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
13 Figure A-2. Aerial photograph of the project site (Google Earth Pro 2021).

Project Site
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 392-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
14 Figure A-3. Soil map of the project site (USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service 2021).

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 30-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
Figure A-3. Photograph of the project site taken from the southeast corner facing northwest (23JUN21).

Figure A-4. Photograph of the project site taken from the northeast corner facing southwest (23JUN21).

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
16 Figure A-5. Photograph of the project site taken from the west corner facing east (23JUN21).

Figure A-6. Photograph of the identified SJKF known den (23JUN21).

APPENDIX B

SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT AND ANIMAL EVALUATION
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
Table B-1: Special-status Plants That May Occur in the Vicinity of the Project.

Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Fed/State/CNPS Description Blooming Period
Field Study
Results/Potential for
Occurrence
Astragalus hornii var.
hornii
Horn’s milk vetch
S/-/1B.1 Annual herb in the Fabaceae found in meadows and seeps and on playas and lake margins on alkaline soils between 197 and 2,789 feet (60–850 meters) in elevation. Known
from occurrences in the Southern San Joaquin Valley, the Tehachapi Mountains and the Western Transverse Ranges
in Kern, Los Angeles, and San Bernardino Counties.

May to October Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Atriplex cordulata var.
cordulata
Heartscale
S/-/1B.2 Herbaceous annual in the Chenopodiaceae found in chenopod scrub, meadows and weeps, and valley and
foothill grasslands in sandy, saline or alkaline soils below 1,837 feet (560 meters) in elevation. Known to occur in the Great Central Valley from Kern County north to Southern Butte County.

April to October Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Atriplex coronata var.
vallicola
Lost Hills crownscale
S/-/1B.2 Herbaceous annual in the Chenopodiaceae found in valley and foothill grasslands, playas, and vernal pools on alkaline soils between 456 and 1,640 feet (139–500 meters) in
elevation.

April to August Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Atriplex tularensis
Bakersfield smallscale
-/E/1A Annual herb in the Chenopodiaceae found in valley and foothill grasslands, between 131 and 328 feet (40–100
meters) in elevation. Known to occur in the San Joaquin Valley from Northwestern Kern County north to Southern
Merced County and in the Sacramento Valley in Southern
Butte County.

June to August
(occasionally October)
Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Calochortus striatus
Alkali mariposa lily
S/-/1B.2 Bulbiferous perennial herb in the Liliaceae found in chaparral, cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest, and valley and foothill grasslands on sandy often granitic, sometimes serpentine soils, between 1,296 and 3,281 feet (395–1,000 meters). Known to occur in the Outer South Coast Ranges in Santa Barbara and San Luis
Obispo Counties.

April to May Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Caulanthus californicus
California jewelflower
E/E/1B.1 Annual herb in the Brassicaceae family found on serpentinite soils in closed-cone coniferous forest,
chaparral, and cismontane woodland between 1,542 and
4,003 feet (470–1,220 meters) in elevation.

May to July Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
19 Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Fed/State/CNPS Description Blooming Period
Field Study
Results/Potential for
Occurrence
Chloropyron molle ssp.
hispidum
Hispid bird’s-beak
S/-/1B.1 Hemiparasitic annual herb in the Orobanchaceae family found on coastal dunes and coastal saltwater marshes and swamps below 98 feet (30 meters) in elevation.

May to October Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Delphinium recurvatum
Recurved larkspur
S/-/1B.2 Perennial herb in the Ranunculaceae family found in chaparral, cismontane woodland, and pinyon and juniper
woodland on rocky, carbonate soils between 984 and 4,396 feet (300–1,340 meters) in elevation. Known to occur in Kern and Tulare Counties.

April to May Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Diplacus pictus
Calico monkeyflower
-/-/1B.2 Annual herb in the Phrymaceae family found in upland and cismontane woodland on granitic soils between 328 and
4690 feet (100-1430 meters). Known to occur in Kern and Tulare Counties.

March to May Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Eremalche parryi ssp.
kernensis
Kern mallow
E/-/1B.1 Perennial, stoloniferous herb in the Onagraceae family found in meadows ad seeps, and subalpine coniferous
forest in mesic soils between 6,562 and 10,236 feet (2,000– 3,120 meters) in elevation. Known to occur in Alpine, El Dorado, Fresno, Madera, Mono, Nevada, Sierra, and
Tuolumne Counties.

July to August Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Eriastrum hooveri
Hoover’s eriastrum
D/-/4.2 Annual herb in the Polemoniaceae family that occurs between 164 and 3,002 feet (50–915 meters) in elevation in pinyon-juniper woodland, and valley and foothill grasslands, occasionally on gravelly soils. Known to occur in the
Southern San Joaquin Valley in Kern and Fresno Counties and on the Carrizo Plain in San Luis Obispo County.

March to July Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Eschscholzia lemmonii
ssp. kernensis
Tejon poppy
-/-/1B.1 Annual herb in the Papaveraceae family found in chaparral, cismontane woodland and valley and foothill grassland on serpentinite clay soil between 656 and 4,921 feet (200– 1,500 meters) in elevation. Known to occur in Fresno,
Imperial, Mendocino, Monterey, San Benito, and San Luis Obispo Counties.

March to June Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Imperata brevifolia
California satintail
-/-/2B.1 Perennial herb in the Poaceae family found in chaparral, coastal sage scrub, creosote bush scrub and wetlandriparian communities. Known to occur in Butte, Lake, Fresno, Tulare, Inyo, Kern, Santa Barbara, Ventura, San Bernadino, Orange, Riverside, San Diego and Imperial
Counties.

September to May Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
20 Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Fed/State/CNPS Description Blooming Period
Field Study
Results/Potential for
Occurrence
Lasthenia glabrata ssp.

Coulteri
Coulter’s goldfields
-/-/1B.1 Annual herb in the Asteraceae family found in vernal pools and saline places at elevations below 1000m. Known to
occur in Kern and San Joaquin Counties
February to June Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Layia leucopappa
Comanche Point layia
S/-/1B.1 Annual herb in the Asteraceae family found in chenopod scrub, and valley and foothill grassland between 328 and 1,148 feet (100–350 meters) in elevation. Known to occur in Kern County.

March to April Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Monolopia congdonii
San Joaquin woollythreads
E/-/1B.2 Perennial, rhizomatous herb in the Ericaceae family found in broadleafed upland forest and North Coast coniferous forest between 328 and 3,609 feet (100–1,100 meters) in elevation. Known to occur in Del Norte, Fresno, Humboldt and Siskiyou Counties.

May to August Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Navarretia setiloba
Piute Mountains
navarretia
S/-/1B.1 Herbaceous annual in the Polemoniaceae family found on clay or gravelly loam soils in cismontane woodland, pinyon and juniper woodland, and valley and foothill grasslands from 1,001 and 6,890 feet (305–2,100 meters) in elevation.

Known from occurrences in the Southern Sierra Nevada in Kern and Tulare Counties.

April to June Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Opuntia basilaris var.
treleasei
Bakersfield cactus
E/E/1B.1 Perennial stem succulent in the Cactaceae family found in chenopod scrub, cismontane woodland, and valley and
foothill grasslands between 394 and 1,804 feet (120–550 meters) in elevation. Known to occur in the Southeast San Joaquin Valley and Southern Sierra Nevada Foothills in
Kern County.

April to May Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Puccinellia simplex
California alkali grass
-/-/1B.1 Annual herb in the Poaceae family found in meadows and seeps between 2,297 and 3,281 feet (700–1,000 meters) in elevation. Known to occur in Kern and San Bernardino
Counties.

April to May Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Stylocline citroleum
Oil neststraw
S/-/1B.1 Annual herb in the Asteraceae family found in chenopod scrub, coastal scrub, and valley and foothill grasslands on clay soils between 164 and 1,312 feet (50–400 meters) in elevation. Known from locations in Kern and San Diego
Counties.

March to April Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
21 Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Fed/State/CNPS Description Blooming Period
Field Study
Results/Potential for
Occurrence
Stylocline masonii
Mason’s neststraw
S/-/1B.1 Annual herb in the Asteraceae family found in chenopod scrub, coastal scrub, and valley and foothill grasslands on clay soils between 164 and 1,312 feet (50–400 meters) in elevation. Known from locations in Kern and San Diego
Counties.

March to April Not Observed/Not
Expected. Decades of
intensive farming has
resulted in vegetation limited
to invasive/ruderal species.

STATUS: Federal and State Listing Code
D Delisted
E Federally or State-listed Endangered
T Federally or State-listed Threatened
CNPS
1A Plants presumed extirpated in California, and either rare or extinct elsewhere 1B.1 Plants considered rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere; seriously threatened in California 1B.2 Plants considered rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere; fairly threatened in California 2B.1 Plants considered rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere; seriously threatened in California

4.2 Plants of limited distribution in California; fairly threatened in California Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
22 Table B-2: Special-status Animals That May Occur in the Vicinity of the Project.

Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Federal/State General Habitat Survey Results/Regional or Nearest Occurrence* Invertebrates
Desmocerus californicus dimorphus
Valley elderberry longhorn beetle
T/- Central Valley riparian forest; nearly always found on or close to its host plant, elderberry (Sambucus species).

Not Present. No suitable habitat for the
species. No host plants present on the
project or vicinity.

Branchinect lynchi
Vernal pool fairy shrimp
T/- Found in vernal pools throughout California. Exist as cysts during the dry season and reproduce when pools
are filled with water again.

Not Present. No suitable habitat present.

Fishes
Hypomesus transpacificus
Delta smelt
T/- Found only in the low-salinity and freshwater habitats of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary. Historically, it
was one of the most common pelagic fish in the estuary
Not Present. No suitable habitat present.

Amphibians
Rana draytonii
California red-legged frog
T/- Found in habitat characterized by dense, shrubby,
riparian vegetation and associated still, or slow-moving water that is at least 2.3 feet deep. The arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis) cattails (Typha sp.) and bulrushes
(Scirpus sp.) provide good habitat.

Not Present. No suitable habitat present.

Spea hammondii
Western spadefoot toad
-/ CSC Central valley and adjacent foothills, Coast Ranges from Point Conception south to the Mexico border;
valley-foothill grasslands and valley-foothill hardwood, shallow temporary pools used for breeding, below
4,472 feet (1,363 meters).

Not Observed/Not Expected. No known
records in the vicinity of the project. No
suitable habitat present on the project.

Marginal habitat is present in the project
vicinity.

Reptiles
Anniella spp.

California legless lizard -/CSC
Found in coastal dunes, chaparral, pine-oak woodlands,
desert scrub, and sandy washes in warm moist loose soils, below 5,085 feet (1550 meters).

Not Observed/Not Expected. Suitable
habitat absent from the site. Potential
habitat in the project vicinity.

Arizona elegans occidentalis
California glossy snake -/CSC Found in low elevation scrub, grasslands and chaparral habitats.

Not Present. No suitable habitat present.

Emys marmorata
Western pond turtle -/CSC
Completely aquatic requiring calm waters such as pools or streams with vegetation banks or logs for basking. Will utilize upland habitat up to about 0.5 km from water.

Not Present. No suitable habitat present.

Gambelia sila
Blunt-nosed leopard lizard (BNLL)

E/E,SFP
Found only in the San Joaquin Valley, adjacent Carrizo
Plain, Elkhorn Plain, Cuyama Valley, and Panoche
Valley; inhabits sparsely vegetated plains, lower canyon slopes, on valley floors, and washes; open grassland,
saltbush scrub, and alkali sink are more common
habitat types.

Not Present. No suitable habitat present.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
23 Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Federal/State General Habitat Survey Results/Regional or Nearest Occurrence* Masticophis flagellum
ruddocki
San Joaquin coachwhip -/CSC
Found in the San Joaquin Valley in open, dry habitats.

Associated with valley grassland and saltbush scrub
habitats containing small mammal burrows which are
used for refugia and oviposition sites.

Not Present. No suitable habitat present.

Phrynosoma blainvillii
Coast horned lizard
-/CSC
Inhabits valley-foothill hardwood, coniferous and
riparian, as well as pine-cypress, juniper, and annual
grasslands, in Sierra Nevada below 3,937 feet (1,200
meters) and in mountains of Southern California and
into the adjacent valleys.

Not Present. No suitable habitat present.

Thamnophis gigas
Giant gartersnake T/T
Found in areas of freshwater marshes or low-gradient
streams. Can also be found in human-made habitats,
such as drainage canals and irrigation ditches,
especially those associated with rice farming.

Not Present. No suitable habitat present.

Species believed to be extirpated from
Kern County.

Birds
Agelaius tricolor
Tricolored blackbird
S/CSC
Forages in grasslands, wetlands, rice fields, croplands, and weedy uplands dominated by mustards and
thistles, etc.; breeds in marshes containing heavy
growth of bulrushes, cattails, and blackberries; found
throughout the Central Valley.

Not Present/Low Probability of
Occurrence in the Project Vicinity. No
suitable nesting or habitat on the site.

Potential for marginal foraging habitat in
farmlands in the vicinity of the project.

Athene cunicularia
Burrowing owl
-/CSC
Inhabits dry, open grasslands, rolling hills, desert floors, prairies, savannas, agricultural land, and other areas of open, bare ground. These owls will also inhabit open
areas near human habitation, such as airports, golf
courses, shoulders of roads, railroad embankments,
and the banks of irrigation ditches and reservoirs.

Not Observed/Moderate Probability of
Occurrence in the Project Vicinity.

Suitable habitat for nesting and foraging
in the vicinity of the project.

Buteo swainsoni
Swainson’s hawk
-/T
Riparian and sometimes large isolated trees used for
nesting; grasslands and agricultural lands used for
foraging; in California, breeds primarily in the
Sacramento Valley, with occasional nesting to the south through Kern County; migrate through the Central and
San Joaquin Valleys to their wintering grounds in South America.

Not Observed/Low Probability of
Occurrence in the Project Vicinity. Few
suitable nesting sites on the project.

Suitable foraging habitat exists across the
row-crop farmland south of metropolitan
Bakersfield. Swainson’s hawk are
uncommon in Kern County.

Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus
Western snowy plover
T/-
Nests, feeds, and takes cover on sandy or gravelly
beaches along the coast, on estuarine salt ponds, alkali lakes, and at the Salton Sea. On the Pacific coast, it
nests on barren to sparsely vegetated sand beaches,
dry salt flats in lagoons, dredge spoils deposited on
beach or dune habitat, levees and flats at saltevaporation ponds, and river bars.

Not Present. No suitable wintering
habitat or foraging habitat exists on the
project.

Circus cyaneus
Northern harrier -/CSC
Widespread breeding resident, other than in the Central Valley, most lowland birds are winter migrants; ground
nester that forages and nests in a wide variety of open Not Observed/Low Probability of
Occurrence in the Project Vicinity. No
suitable nesting sites on the project.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
24 Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Federal/State General Habitat Survey Results/Regional or Nearest Occurrence* habitats with low perches such as marshes, fields, and
other treeless areas.

Suitable foraging habitat exists across the
row-crop farmland south of metropolitan
Bakersfield.

Coccyzus americanus occidentalis
Western yellow-billed cuckoo
T/E
Nests in walnut and almond orchards in California,
natural nesting habitat is in cottonwood-tree willow
riparian forest. Known populations of breeding western
yellow-billed cuckoo are several disjunct locations in
California, Arizona, and western New Mexico.

Not Present. No suitable nesting habitat
exists on the project for this species. The
site represents poor foraging habitat.

Elanus leucurus
White tailed kite
-/SFP
Associated habitats include open grasslands,
savannahs, agriculture, wetlands, oak woodland and
riparian areas with associated open space.

Not Observed/Low Probability of
Occurrence in the Project Vicinity. No
suitable nesting sites on the project.

Suitable foraging habitat exists across the
row-crop farmland south of metropolitan
Bakersfield. Swainson’s hawk are
frequently observed moving through Kern
County during the migratory period.

Swainson’s hawk are uncommon nesters
in Kern County.

Empidonax traillii
Willow Flycatcher
-/E
Nests and forages in riparian habitats with dense
vegetation characterized by willows, buttonbush and
coyote brush, with a scattered overstory of cottonwood.

Have also been known to nest in thickets dominated by
tamarisk.

Not Present. No suitable nesting or
foraging habitat present.

Lanius ludovicianus
Loggerhead shrike
-/CSC
Common resident and winter visitor in lowlands and
foothills throughout California; species prefers open
habitats with scattered shrubs, trees, posts, fences,
utility lines, or other perches; nests on stable branches in densely-foliaged shrubs or trees, usually wellconcealed.

Not Observed/Moderate Probability of
Occurrence in the Project Vicinity. No
suitable nesting habitat present.

Loggerhead shrike occur throughout the
southern San Joaquin Valley and
undoubtedly forage in the project vicinity.

Mammals
Ammospermophilus nelsoni
San Joaquin antelope squirrel -/T
Found in grasslands or open shrublands; formerly more
extensive, current range includes southwestern portion
of the San Joaquin Valley and in adjacent valleys to the west.

Not Present. Beyond the current
published range of the species.

Dipodomys ingens
Giant kangaroo rat
E/E
Western side of the San Joaquin Valley, including the
Carrizo Plain and the Panoche Valley; grassland and
shrub-land habitats with sparse vegetative cover and
soils that are well-drained, fine sandy loams with gentle slopes.

Not Present. Beyond the current
published range of the species.

Dipodomys nitratoides brevinasus
Short-nosed kangaroo rat E/E
Found in arid communities on the valley floor portions
of Kern, Tulare, and Kings counties in scrub and
grassland communities in level to near-level terrain with Not Present. Beyond the published
range of the species.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
25 Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Federal/State General Habitat Survey Results/Regional or Nearest Occurrence* alluvial fan-floodplain soil (fine sands and sandy loams) with sparse grasses and woody vegetation such as
iodine bush, saltbush, seep weed, and mesquite.

Dipodomys nitratoides nitratoides
Tipton kangaroo rat
E/E
Found in arid communities on the valley floor portions
of Kern, Tulare, and Kings counties in scrub and
grassland communities in level to near-level terrain with alluvial fan-floodplain soil (fine sands and sandy loams) with sparse grasses and woody vegetation such as
iodine bush, saltbush, seep weed, and mesquite.

Not Present. No suitable habitat present.

Not within the southwest focus area of
the MBHCP.

Eumops perotis californicus
Greater western mastiff bat
-/CSC
Open, semi-arid to arid habitats, including conifer and deciduous woodlands, annual and perennial
grasslands, chaparral, desert scrub, and urban areas;
roosts in cliff faces, as well as high buildings, trees, and tunnels; uncommon resident in southwestern San
Joaquin Valley.

No Roosting Sites Present. No known
occurrences in the vicinity of the project.

Information on some bat species
indicates foraging may occur over 10’s of
miles from roosting sites. Impacts not
expected.

Lasiurus cinereus
Hoary bat
-/CSC
Open, semi-arid to arid habitats, including conifer and deciduous woodlands, annual and perennial
grasslands, chaparral, desert scrub, and urban areas;
roosts in cliff faces, as well as high buildings, trees, and tunnels; uncommon resident in southwestern San
Joaquin Valley.

No Roosting Sites Present. No known
occurrences in the vicinity of the project.

Information on some bat species
indicates foraging may occur over 10’s of
miles from roosting sites. Impacts not
expected.

Onychomys torridus tularensis
Tulare grasshopper mouse
-/CSC
Found in valley grasslands habitats, blue oak savanna,
desert associations dominated by annual grasses and
California ephedra, alkali sink scrub, saltbush scrub,
and upper Sonoran shrub associations, dominated by
ephedra.

Not Observed/Not Expected. No
suitable habitat present.

Perognathus inornatus inornatus
San Joaquin pocket mouse
S/-
Found in west-central California in the Upper
Sacramento Valley, Tehama County, southward
through the San Joaquin and Salinas valleys and
contiguous areas to the Mojave Desert in Los Angeles,
Kern and extreme western San Bernardino counties.

Inhabits dry, open, grassy or weedy areas and annual
grasslands, savannas, and desert-scrub associations
with sandy washes or finely textured soils.

Not Observed/Not Expected. No
suitable habitat present.

Sorex ornatus relictus
Buena Vista Lake shrew
E/CSC
Formerly occupied marshlands of the San Joaquin
Valley and the Tulare Basin. Its range has become
much restricted due to the loss of lakes and sloughs in the area. It has been recorded from the Kern Lake
Preserve area and the Kern National Wildlife Refuge.

Current distribution is unknown but likely to be very
restricted due to the loss of habitat.

Not Present. No suitable habitat present.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
26 Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Federal/State General Habitat Survey Results/Regional or Nearest Occurrence* Taxidea taxus
American badger -/CSC
Uncommon resident found through California; in less
disturbed grassland and shrubland habitats in San
Joaquin Valley.

Not Present No suitable habitat present.

Vulpes macrotis mutica
San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF)
E/T
Found in valley saltbush scrub, valley sink scrub,
Interior Coast Range saltbush scrub, upper Sonoran
sub-shrub scrub, non-native grassland, and valley
sacaton grassland in the Central Valley and adjacent
foothills and valleys, infrequently to the outer Coast
Ranges; generally not found in densely wooded areas,
wetland areas, or areas subject to frequent periodic
flooding.

SJKF Known Den Observed/High
Probability of Occurrence in the
Project Vicinity. A SJKF known den was
identified on the project site. SJKF natal
dens are documented on land adjacent to
the project.

STATUS:

Federal
S Listed as a BLM Sensitive Species
D Delisted
E Listed as Endangered
PT Proposed as Threatened
T Listed as Threatened
C Candidate for Endangered Status
State
CSC California Department of Fish and Wildlife Designated Species of Special Concern
D Delisted
E Listed as Endangered
SFP California Department of Fish and Wildlife Designated Fully Protected
T Listed as Threatened
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
27 Figure B-1. CNDDB special-status plant species occurrences within a 10-mile radius of the project (CDFW 2021). ^_
0 2.5 5
Miles
CNDDB Plant Occurrences Map
¯
!
!
Legend
^_ Project Location
10-mile Buffer
Astragalus hornii var. hornii
Calochortus striatus
Chloropyron molle ssp.
hispidum
Delphinium recurvatum
Eremalche parryi ssp.
kernensis
Eriastrum hooveri
Eschscholzia lemmonii ssp.
kernensis
Great Valley Cottonwood
Riparian Forest
Great Valley Mesquite Scrub
Imperata brevifolia
Monolopia congdonii
Opuntia basilaris var. treleasei
Stylocline masonii
Valley Sacaton Grassland
Valley Saltbush Scrub
Valley Sink Scrub
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
28 Figure B-2. CNDDB special-status bird species occurrences within a 10-mile radius of the project (CDFW 2021). ^_
0 2.5 5
Miles
CNDDB Bird Occurrences Map
¯
!
!
Legend
^_ Project Location
10-mile Buffer
Agelaius tricolor
Athene cunicularia
Buteo swainsoni
Elanus leucurus
Eremophila alpestris actia
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
29 Figure B-3. CNDDB special-status amphibian and reptile species occurrences within a 10-mile radius of the project (CDFW 2021). ^_
0 2.5 5
Miles
CNDDB Reptile & Amphibian
Occurrences Map
¯
!
!
Legend
^_ Project Location
10-mile Buffer
Arizona elegans occidentalis
Anniella grinnelli
Emys marmorata
Gambelia sila
Masticophis flagellum ruddocki
Phrynosoma blainvillii
Spea hammondii
Thamnophis gigas
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
30 Figure B-4. CNDDB special-status mammal species occurrences within a 10-mile radius of the project (CDFW 2021). ^_
0 2.5 5
Miles
CNDDB Mammal Occurrences Map
¯
!
!
Legend
^_ Project Location
10-mile Buffer
Dipodomys ingens
Ammospermophilus nelsoni
Perognathus inornatus
Eumops perotis californicus
Lasiurus cinereus
Onychomys torridus tularensis
Sorex ornatus relictus
Taxidea taxus
Dipodomys nitratoides nitratoides
Vulpes macrotis mutica

APPENDIX C

PLANTS AND ANIMALS OBSERVED ON THE PROJECT

FIELD STUDY CONDUCTED
23 June 2021
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 390-300-28, -29, -30
July 2021
Table C-1. Vascular plant species observed during the field study conducted on the project site.

Scientific Name Common Name
Chenopodiaceae
Salsola tragus Russian thistle
Euphorbiaceae
Euphorbia sp. Common spurge
Geraniaceae
Erodium cicutarium Redstem filaree
Myrtaceae
Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus
Poaceae
Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens Red brome
Poa annua Annual bluegrass
Zygophyllaceae
Tribulus terrestris Punctervine
Table C-2. Vertebrate animal species observed during the field study conducted on the project site.

Scientific Name Common Name
Birds
Corvus corax Common raven
Haemorhous mexicanus House finch
Zenaida macroura Mourning dove
Mammals
Otospermophilus beecheyi California ground squirrel
Vulpes macrotis mutica San Joaquin kit fox
To: Tom Dee Record Search 21-261
RGF Properties, LLC
9100 Ming Ave. #120
Bakersfield, CA 93311
Date: July 12, 2021
Re: Camino Media Project
County: Kern
Map(s): Gosford 7.5’

CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH
The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical Resources Information System’s (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the CHRIS inventory and make it available to local, state, and federal agencies, cultural resource professionals, Native American tribes, researchers, and the public. Recommendations made by IC coordinators or their staff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the evaluation or opinion of the State Historic Preservation Officer in carrying out the OHP’s regulatory authority under federal and state law.

The following are the results of a search of the cultural resource files at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center. These files include known and recorded cultural resources sites, inventory and excavation reports filed with this office, and resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the OHP Built Environment Resources Directory, California State Historical Landmarks, California Register of Historical Resources, California Inventory of Historic Resources, and California Points of Historical Interest. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the OHP are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area.

PRIOR CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS
According to the information in our files, there has been one previous cultural resource study conducted within the project area, KE-01601. There have been three additional studies conducted within a one-half mile radius, KE-02280, KE-03715, and KE-05038.

Record Search 21-261

KNOWN/RECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS There are no recorded resources within the project area, and it is not known if any exist there. There is one recorded resource within the one-half mile radius, P-15-003850. This resource consists of prehistoric era habitation debris and a prehistoric era lithic scatter.

There are no recorded cultural resources within the project area or radius that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, or the California State Historic Landmarks.

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
We understand this project consists of a zone change/general plan amendment from commercial office / OC to R-2 HMR. Further we understand this project will ultimately lead to the development of 120 – 195 multifamily units in multiple buildings on land that is currently vacant and has not previously been developed.

The one study completed in this project area was done over 30 years ago and is no longer considered valid. Due to changes in field methods and technology, it is unknown if any cultural resources are present on this property. Therefore, prior to any ground disturbance activities, we recommend a qualified, professional consultant conduct a field survey to determine if any cultural resources are present. A list of qualified consultants can be found at www.chrisinfo.org.

We also recommend that you contact the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento. They will provide you with a current list of Native American individuals/organizations that can assist you with information regarding cultural resources that may not be included in the CHRIS Inventory and that may be of concern to the Native groups in the area. The Commission can consult their "Sacred Lands Inventory" file to determine what sacred resources, if any, exist within this project area and the way in which these resources might be managed. Finally, please consult with the lead agency on this project to determine if any other cultural resource investigation is required. If you need any additional information or have any questions or concerns, please contact our office at (661) 654-2289.

By:

Celeste M. Thomson, Coordinator Date: July 12, 2021
Please note that invoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.

Digitally signed by Celeste M.

Thomson
Date: 2021.07.12 08:12:49
-07'00'

SMALL PROJECT ANALYSIS LEVEL ASSESSMENT
Camino Media – University Square
Bakersfield, CA
Prepared For:

RGF Properties
9100 Ming Avenue, Suite 120
Bakersfield, CA 93311
Prepared By:

TRINITY CONSULTANTS
4900 California Avenue, Suite 420A
Bakersfield, CA 93309
(661) 282-2200
August 2021, revised May 2025
Project 210505.0147
Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1

1.1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 1-1

1.2 Statement of Finding ................................................................................................ 1-1

2. PROJECT INFORMATION 2-1

2.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................. 2-1

2.2 Project Location........................................................................................................ 2-1

3. SMALL PROJECT ANALYSIS LEVEL QUALIFICATION 3-1

4. AIR QUALITY IMPACTS THRESHOLDS AND EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 4-1

5. PROJECT-RELATED EMISSIONS 5-1

5.1 Short-Term Emissions ............................................................................................... 5-1

5.2 Long-Term Emissions................................................................................................ 5-1

5.3 Potential Impact on Sensitive Receptors .................................................................. 5-2

5.4 Potential Impacts to Visibility to Nearby Class 1 Areas............................................. 5-3

5.5 Potential Odor Impacts ............................................................................................. 5-3

5.6 Ambient Air Quality Impacts ..................................................................................... 5-3

5.7 Toxic Air Contaminant (TAC) Impacts....................................................................... 5-4

5.7.1 Air Dispersion Modeling (AERMOD)...........................................................................5-4

5.7.2 HARP2 ...................................................................................................................5-6

5.7.3 Health Risk Results..................................................................................................5-7

5.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions........................................................................................ 5-8

5.9 Cumulative Impacts.................................................................................................. 5-9

6. CONCLUSIONS 6-1

7. REFERENCES 7-1
APPENDIX A. CALEEMOD EMISSIONS ESTIMATES OUTPUT A-1
APPENDIX B. HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MODELING FILES B-1
Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants ii

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1. Project Location 2-1
Figure 2-2. Proposed Site Plan 2-2
Figure 5-1. Receptors Analyzed for Health Risk 5-6
Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants iii

LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-1. Small Project Analysis Level in Units for Residential 3-1 Table 4-1. SJVAPCD Air Quality Thresholds of Significance - Criteria Pollutants 4-1 Table 4-2. Measures of Significance - Toxic Air Contaminants 4-2 Table 5-1. Project Construction Emissions 5-1
Table 5-2. Total Project Operational Emissions 5-2
Table 5-3. Sensitive Receptors Located < 2 Miles from Project 5-2 Table 5-4. Average Daily Emissions 5-4
Table 5-5. Potential Maximum Health Risk Impacts 5-7
Table 5-6. Estimated Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MT/Year) 5-9 Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 1-1

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 Executive Summary
Trinity Consultants has completed a limited air quality assessment for 191-unit multi-family residential community near the intersection of Camino Media and Old River Road in Bakersfield, California.

This limited air quality assessment uses the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District’s (SJVAPCD) screening tool, Small Project Analysis Level (SPAL) (SJVAPCD 2020). This SPAL assessment was prepared pursuant to the City of Bakersfield’s Technical Study Guidelines (Bakersfield 2015), SJVAPCD’s Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI) (SJVAPCD 2015), the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code 21000 to 21189) Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 15000 – 15387).

1.2 Statement of Finding
Based on the SPAL established by the SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI, the emissions estimates prepared pursuant to this SPAL assessment do not exceed the SJVAPCD’s established emissions thresholds and significance thresholds for all CEQA air quality determinations; this Project would therefore not pose a significant impact to the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin and would have a less than significant air quality impact.

Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 2-1

2. PROJECT INFORMATION

2.1 Introduction
The Project site is located in the City of Bakersfield east of the intersection of Camino Media and Old River Road on APNs 390-300-29 and 390-300-30. The Project includes the construction of 191 multi-family residential units. The Project was assessed as if it would be developed in one phase. This assessment examines the projected gross impacts to air quality posed by this Project to the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin to determine whether or not the Project remains below established air quality thresholds of significance.

2.2 Project Location
The Project is located in the City of Bakersfield east of the intersection of Camino Media and Old River Road.

Figure 2-1 depicts the Project location within the City of Bakersfield and Figure 2-2 depicts the proposed site plan.

Figure 2-1. Project Location
Project
Location
Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 2-2
Figure 2-2. Proposed Site Plan
Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 3-1

3. SMALL PROJECT ANALYSIS LEVEL QUALIFICATION
This assessment was prepared pursuant to the SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI (SJVAPCD 2015), the CEQA (Public Resources Code 21000 to 21189) and CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 15000 – 15387). The SJVAPCD created the SPAL screening tool to streamline air quality assessments of commonly encountered projects. According to GAMAQI, the SJVAPCD “pre-calculated the emissions on a large number and types of projects to identify the level at which they have no possibility of exceeding the emissions thresholds”1.

The SJVAPCD SPAL process established review parameters to determine whether a project qualifies as a “small project.” A project that is found to be “less than” the established parameters has “no possibility of exceeding criteria pollutant emissions thresholds.” Table 3-1 presents the SPAL size parameters for residential projects.

Table 3-1. Small Project Analysis Level in Units for Residential Land Use Category – Residential Project Size (dwelling unit)* Single Family 155
Apartment, Low Rise 224
Apartment, Mid Rise 225
Apartment, High Rise 340
Condominiums/Townhouse 256
Condominiums, High Rise 352
Mobile Home Park 292
Retirement Community 580
Congregate Care Assisted Living 536
Proposed Project – Apartment, Low Rise 191
SPAL Exceeded? No
*Project size based on SPAL Table 1, as posted on SJVAPCD webpage:
http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CEQA Rules/GAMAQI-SPAL.pdf As shown in Table 3-1, the proposed Project would not exceed the established SPAL limits for an “Apartment, Low Rise” residential project. The Project would construct 191 units compared to the allowable project size for a low rise apartment project which is 224 units. Based on the above information, this Project qualifies for a limited air quality analysis applying the SPAL guidance to determine air quality impacts. 1 SJVAPCD GAMAQI, Section 8.3.4, Page 85.

Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 4-1

4. AIR QUALITY IMPACTS THRESHOLDS AND EVALUATION

METHODOLOGY
Significance thresholds are based on the CEQA Appendix G Environmental Checklist Form (not included herein) and SJVAPCD air quality thresholds (SJVAPCD 2015). A potentially significant impact to air quality, as defined by the CEQA Checklist, would occur if the project caused one or more of the following to occur:
► Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan; ► Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard; ► Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; and/or ► Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

The SJVAPCD has identified quantitative emission thresholds to determine whether the potential air quality impacts of a project require analysis in the form of an Environmental Impact Report. The SJVAPCD air quality thresholds from the GAMAQI are presented in Table 4-1 (SJVAPCD 2015). The SJVAPCD separates construction emissions from operational emissions, and further separates permitted operational emissions from non-permitted operational emissions, for determining significance thresholds for air pollutant emissions.

Table 4-1. SJVAPCD Air Quality Thresholds of Significance - Criteria Pollutants Pollutant/
Precursor
Construction
Emissions
Operational Emissions
Permitted Equipment
and Activities
Non-Permitted
Equipment and Activities
Emissions (tpy) Emissions (tpy) Emissions (tpy)
CO 100 100 100
NOx 10 10 10
ROG 10 10 10
SOx 27 27 27
PM10 15 15 15
PM2.5 15 15 15
Source: SJVAPCD 2015
Criteria pollutant emissions were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2022.1 (California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) 2022). This project would generate short-term construction emissions and long-term operational emissions.

An air quality evaluation also considers: 1) exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; and 2) the creation of other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. The criteria for this evaluation are based on the Lead Agency’s determination of the proximity of the proposed Project to sensitive receptors. A sensitive receptor is a location where human populations, especially children, senior citizens and sick persons, are present, and where there is a reasonable expectation of continuous human exposure to pollutants, according to the averaging period for ambient air quality standards, i.e. the 24-hour, 8-hour or 1-hour standards. Commercial and industrial sources are not considered sensitive receptors.

Regarding toxic air contaminants, the SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI states, “From a health risk perspective there are basically two types of land use projects that have the potential to cause long-term public health risk impacts:

Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 4-2
► Type A Projects: Land use projects that will place new toxic sources in the vicinity of existing receptors, and
► Type B Projects: Land use projects that will place new receptors in the vicinity of existing toxics sources” (SJVAPCD 2015).

Table 4-2 presents the thresholds of significance used with toxic air contaminants when evaluating toxic air contaminants (TACs).

Table 4-2. Measures of Significance - Toxic Air Contaminants Agency Level Description
Significance Thresholds Adopted for the Evaluation of Impacts Under CEQA

SJVAPCD
Carcinogens Maximally Exposed Individual risk equals or exceeds 20 in one million.

NonCarcinogens
Acute: Hazard Index equals or exceeds 1 for the
Maximally Exposed Individual.

Chronic: Hazard Index equals or exceeds 1 for the
Maximally Exposed Individual.

Source: SJVAPCD 2015
Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-1

5. PROJECT-RELATED EMISSIONS
This document was prepared pursuant to the SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI and SPAL guidelines and provides a cursory review of the Project emissions to demonstrate that it would not exceed established air quality emissions thresholds.

5.1 Short-Term Emissions
Table 5-1 shows the construction emission levels for the construction of a 191 unit low rise apartment project (see Appendix A). The construction emissions were based on the default CalEEMod equipment list for the proposed Project’s land use type and development intensity and applying model defaults as well as a conservative analysis approach. Construction emissions were estimated under the assumption that the residential development would begin construction in May 2025. The dates entered into the CalEEMod program represent the earliest construction timeline, which would estimate the worst-case emissions as construction equipment technology and emissions improve over time; therefore, all estimated emission totals are conservative and reflect a reasonable and legally sufficient estimate of potential impacts. All construction equipment activity levels assumed were based on the CalEEMod default values for type and number of equipment and hours per day.

Construction emission estimates also included the following SJVAPCD’s required measures for all projects:
► Water exposed area 3 times per day; and
► Reduce vehicle speed to less than 15 miles per hour.

Based on these anticipated activity levels, the Project construction activities would not exceed construction thresholds, as shown in Table 5-1. Therefore, construction emissions were found to be less than significant, and no further evaluation is required.

Table 5-1. Project Construction Emissions
Emissions
Source
Pollutant
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
(tons/year)
2025 Construction Emissions 0.23 1.87 2.52 0.00 0.32 0.15 2026 Construction Emissions 0.26 1.76 3.21 0.00 0.36 0.13 2027 Construction Emissions 0.71 0.39 0.70 0.00 0.07 0.03 Maximum Annual Emissions 0.71 1.87 3.21 0.00 0.36 0.15
SJVAPCD Construction Emissions Thresholds 10 10 100 27 15 15 Is Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Source: Trinity Consultants 2025
Note: 0.00 could represent < 0.00; SOx is assumed to be equivalent to SO2.

As calculated with CalEEMod, the estimated short-term construction-related emissions would not exceed SJVAPCD significance threshold levels during any given year and would therefore be less than significant.

5.2 Long-Term Emissions
Table 5-2 presents the Project’s long-term operations emissions generated from mobile, energy, and area sources as well as from water use and waste generation emissions. Most of these emissions impacts are from Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-2
mobile sources traveling to and from the Project area. The following changes to default values were incorporated during the CalEEMod analysis:
► Daily trip rate was updated to 1,403 trips per day according to the Traffic Study (Ruettgers & Schuler 2021)
Table 5-2. Total Project Operational Emissions
Emissions
Source
Pollutant
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
(tons/year)
Operational Emissions
Mobile 0.71 0.75 6.67 0.02 1.69 0.44
Area 0.97 0.01 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Energy 0.01 0.26 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.02
Water - - - - - -
Waste - - - - - -
Refrigerants - - - - - -
Total Emissions 1.70 1.02 7.78 0.02 1.71 0.46
SJVAPCD Operational Emissions Thresholds 10 10 100 27 15 15 Is Threshold Exceeded Before Mitigation? No No No No No No Source: Trinity Consultants 2025
Note: 0.00 could represent < 0.00; SOx is assumed to be equivalent to SO2.

As calculated (see Appendix A), the long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed Project would be less than SJVAPCD significance threshold levels and would, therefore, not pose a significant impact to criteria air pollutants. This finding is consistent with the SPAL screening thresholds.

5.3 Potential Impact on Sensitive Receptors
The proposed Project is located east of the intersection between Camino Media and Old River Road. Sensitive receptors are defined as areas where young children, chronically ill individuals, the elderly, or people who are more sensitive than the general population reside. Schools, hospitals, nursing homes and daycare centers are locations where sensitive receptors would likely reside. There are currently sensitive receptors at the existing Rosewood senior living and health center located on the proposed Project site.

Table 5-3 below shows the non-residential sensitive receptors within 2 miles of the Project site.

Table 5-3. Sensitive Receptors Located < 2 Miles from Project Receptor Type of Facility Distance from
Project in Miles
Direction from
Project
Childtime of Bakersfield Daycare 0.03 S
CSUB Children’s Center Daycare 0.23 N
Mercy Hospital Hospital 0.34 N
Ronald Regan Elementary School Elementary School 0.58 W Leo B Hart Elementary School Elementary School 0.89 S
Christa McAuliffe Elementary School Elementary School 0.92 SE Brookdale Riverwalk Senior Living 1.0 N
Brookside Senior Apartments Senior Living 1.0 SW
Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-3
Receptor Type of Facility Distance from
Project in Miles
Direction from
Project
Stockdale Elementary School Elementary 1.13 E
Solstice Senior Living Senior Living 1.14 SE
Stockdale High School High School 1.19 SW
Magnolia Place Senior Living 1.2 SE
Columbia Elementary School Elementary School 1.28 N
La Petite Academy Daycare 1.32 SE
American Elementary School Elementary School 1.32 N
Tevis Junior High School Middle School 1.49 SE
Liberty High School High School 1.54 NW
Quailwood Elementary School Elementary School 1.67 NE
Oaks Children Center Daycare 1.69 S
Bakersfield Christian High School High School 1.69 W
Old River Elementary School Elementary School 1.74 S
Sing Lum Elementary School Elementary School 2.0 S
The closest school is Ronald Reagan Elementary School at 0.58 miles to the west. The closest hospital is Mercy Hospital Southwest at 0.34 miles north, and the closest daycare facility is Childtime of Bakersfield at 0.03 miles to the south of the Project.

5.4 Potential Impacts to Visibility to Nearby Class 1 Areas It should be noted that visibility impact analyses are not usually conducted for area sources. The recommended analysis methodology was initially intended for stationary sources of emissions which were subject to the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) requirements in 40 CFR Part 60. Since the Project’s emissions are predicted to be significantly less than the PSD threshold levels, an impact at either the Dome Land Wilderness or the Sequoia National Park Areas (the two nearest Class 1 areas to the Project) is extremely unlikely. Therefore, based on the Project’s predicted emissions, the Project is not expected to have any adverse impact to visibility at any Class 1 Area.

5.5 Potential Odor Impacts
The proposed Project is a residential community located near other residential neighborhoods. Expected uses are not known to be a source of nuisance odors and are not listed in Table 6 of the SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI. The Project is therefore not anticipated to have substantial odor impacts. The Project is therefore anticipated to have a less than significant odor impact.

5.6 Ambient Air Quality Impacts
As stated in the of GAMAQI (2015, p 96-97), SJVAPCD has developed screening levels for requiring an Ambient Air Quality Analysis (AAQA). The SJVAPCD recommends that an AAQA be performed for all criteria pollutants when emissions of any criteria pollutant resulting from project construction or operational activities exceed the 100 pounds per day screening level, after compliance with Rule 9510 requirements and implementation of all enforceable mitigation measures.

Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-4
As shown above in Table 5-4 below, average daily emissions for construction and operational activities associated with this Project would not exceed 100 pounds per day. Therefore, an AAQA is not required for this Project.

Table 5-4. Average Daily Emissions
Emission Source Pollutant (Pounds/Day)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Construction Emissions
Average Daily (Max) Emissions 5.50 14.37 24.66 0.03 2.74 1.14 AAQA Threshold 100 100 100 100 100 100
Is Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Operational Emissions
Average Daily (Max) Emissions 9.31 5.59 42.64 0.10 9.38 2.50 AAQA Threshold 100 100 100 100 100 100
Is Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No

5.7 Toxic Air Contaminant (TAC) Impacts
TACs, as defined by the California Health & Safety Code (CH&SC) §44321, are listed in Appendices AI and AII in AB 2588 Air Toxic “Hot Spots” and Assessment Act’s Emissions Inventory Criteria and Guideline Regulation document. SJVAPCD’s risk management objectives for permitting and CEQA are as follows:
► Minimize health risks from new and modified sources of air pollution. ► Health risks from new and modified sources shall not be significant relative to the background risk levels and other risk levels that are typically accepted throughout the community. ► Avoid unreasonable restrictions on permitting.

The proposed Project would result in emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) during construction and would be located near existing residents; therefore, an assessment of the potential risk to the population attributable to emissions of hazardous air pollutants from the proposed Project is required. To predict the potential health risk to the population attributable to emissions of TACs from the proposed Project, ambient air concentrations were predicted with dispersion modeling to arrive at a conservative estimate of increased individual carcinogenic risk that might occur as a result of continuous exposure over the construction period for construction emissions. Similarly, predicted concentrations were used to calculate non-cancer chronic and acute hazard indices (HIs), which are the ratio of expected exposure to acceptable exposure. The basis for evaluating potential health risk is the identification of sources with increased TACs. TAC emissions from anticipated on-site construction activities were evaluated.

5.7.1 Air Dispersion Modeling (AERMOD)
Air dispersion modeling is used to estimate off-site air concentrations of chemicals associated with facility emissions. Developed to replace the Industrial Source Complex Short-Term Version 3 (ISCST3) model, AERMOD is a steady-state Gaussian plume model that can be used to assess ground level pollutant concentrations from a wide variety of sources (point, line, area, or volume) for distances up to approximately 50 km, including urban and rural terrains. AERMOD can calculate ground level concentrations for various averaging periods, such as acute short-term exposures (1-hour averaging), chronic long term exposures (annual averages), or other required meteorological data periods (i.e., 3-hour, 8-hour, 24-hour). The assumptions used for this model are listed below.

Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-5
► AERMOD Version 24142
► Projection Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)
► Datum World Geodetic System (WGS84)
► UTM Zone 11
► Hemisphere Northern
► Selection Hourly and Period
► AERMOD File .AMI and .AMZ
► AERMOD Output File Plot File by Source
► Use Regulatory Default? Yes
► Urban or Rural? Urban
► Building Downwash? Yes
Health risk is determined using the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program (HARP2) software distributed by the CARB; HARP2 requires peak 1-hour emission rates and annual-averaged emission rates for all pollutants for each modeling source (CARB 2015). Assumptions used to calculate the emission rates for the proposed Project are outlined below.

5.7.1.1 Sources
To assess health risk impacts associated with Project construction emissions, combustion emissions from diesel on-site construction equipment and heavy heavy duty (HHD) trucks from hauling and vendor trips were modeled as an area source for on-site construction activity on the property. A unit emission rate of 1 grams/second (g/sec) was input to AERMOD as a normalized emission rate. This normalized emission rate generates a file that contains the partial contribution of each source to the total air concentration in units of micrograms per cubic meter (g/m3) at each receptor. This AERMOD output file is then used as an input file into HARP2, which is discussed in Section 5.7.2.

5.7.1.2 Receptors
Discrete receptors were placed on residences, businesses, and sensitive receptors within close proximity of the Project site. A total of 2,684 discrete off-site receptors analyzed. The receptors are shown below in Figure 5-1. Elevated terrain options were employed even though there is not complex terrain in the Project area.

Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-6
Figure 5-1. Receptors Analyzed for Health Risk

5.7.1.3 Meteorological Data
SJVAPCD-provided, AERMET UStar processed meteorological datasets for the Bakersfield monitoring station, calendar years 2018 through 2022 was input to AERMOD (SJVAPCD 2023). This was the most recent available dataset available at the time the modeling was conducted. Urban dispersion parameters were used because the operation and the majority of the land surrounding the facility is considered "urban" under the Auer land use classification method (Auer 1978).

5.7.2 HARP2
Plot files generated by AERMOD were uploaded to the Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Assessment Tool (ADMRT) program in the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program Version 2 (HARP2) (CARB 2015). ADMRT post-processing was used to assess the potential for excess cancer risk and chronic non-cancer effects using the most recent health effects data from the California EPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA).

5.7.2.1 Toxic Emissions Quantification
Diesel particulate matter was calculated based on the CalEEMod output of PM10 for on-site construction equipment. It is conservatively assumed that all PM10 exhaust from CalEEMod is diesel particulate matter.

While each year of construction has different emissions, the HARP2 analysis was conducted based on the maximum annual emissions of PM10 from construction, which is a conservative estimate.

Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-7

5.7.2.1.1 Health Impacts of Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) Short term exposure to high concentrations to DPM can cause headache, dizziness, and irritation of the eye, nose, and throat. Long term exposure can increase the risk of cardiovascular, cardiopulmonary and respiratory disease, and lung cancer.

5.7.2.2 Exposure
HARP2 site parameters were set for the mandatory minimum pathways (inhalation, soil ingestion, dermal, and mother’s milk, and homegrown produce for residential and sensitive receptors; inhalation, soil ingestion, and dermal for worker receptors). As required by SJVAPCD, time away from home adjustments were not applied in HARP2. Risk reports were generated using the derived OEHHA analysis method for carcinogenic risk and non-carcinogenic chronic risk. Site parameters are included in the HARP2 output files. Total cancer risk was predicted for each receptor. A hazard index was computed for chronic non-cancer health effects for each applicable endpoint and each receptor. A hazard index for acute non-cancer health effects was not computed since DPM does not have a risk exposure level for acute risk.

5.7.3 Health Risk Results
SJVAPCD has set the level of significance for carcinogenic risk at twenty in one million, which is understood as the possibility of causing twenty additional cancer cases in a population of one million people. The level of significance for chronic non-cancer risk is a hazard index of 1.0. All receptors were modeled with a 2-year exposure duration for the construction activities.

The carcinogenic risk and the health hazard index (HI) for chronic non-cancer risk at the maximum exposed individual resident, worker, and sensitive receptor (MEIR, MEIW, and MEISR, respectively) do not exceed the significance levels of twenty in one million (20E-06) and 1.0, respectively for the proposed Project. The MEIR, MEIW, and MEISR are identified by receptor location and risk and are provided in Table 5-5. The electronic AERMOD and HARP2 output files are provided in Appendix B.

Table 5-5. Potential Maximum Health Risk Impacts
Receptor Type Category Value UTM East UTM North
MEIR Excess Cancer Risk 1.33 in a million 307794.2 3913489.2 Chronic Hazard Index 0.0008 307794.2 3913489.2
MEIW Excess Cancer Risk 0.43 in a million 308091.7 3913323.5 Chronic Hazard Index 0.0119 308091.7 3913323.5
MEISR Excess Cancer Risk 1.60 in a million 308009.2 3913177.6 Chronic Hazard Index 0.0009 308009.2 3913177.6
As shown above in Table 5-5, the maximum predicted cancer risk for the proposed Project is 1.60 in a million.

The maximum chronic non-cancer hazard index for the proposed Project is 0.0119.

The potential health risk attributable to the proposed Project is determined to be less than significant based on the following conclusions:

1. Potential carcinogenic risk from the proposed Project is below the significance level of twenty in a million at each of the modeled receptors; and

2. The hazard index for the potential chronic non-cancer risk from the proposed Project is below the significance level of 1.0 at each of the modeled receptors.

Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-8

3. The hazard index for the potential acute non-cancer risk was not calculated since there is no acute risk associated with DPM emission; therefore, the proposed Project is considered below the significance level.

Therefore, potential risk to the population attributable to emissions of TACs from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

5.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Since SJVAPCD published the GAMAQI, several new laws and executive orders were adopted that require additional reductions in years after 2020. For instance, Senate Bill 32 (Lara, 2016) requires that GHG emissions be 40% less than 1990 levels by 2030. Furthermore, Senate Bill 100 (de Leon, 2018) requires 100% zerocarbon electricity by 2045. On the day SB 100 was signed into law, the Governor also signed Executive Order B-55-18 which commits California to total, economy-wide carbon neutrality by 2045. While GHG emissions from an individual project may not have a detectable impact on global climate change, it may contribute to a significant cumulative problem (BAAQMD 2022). Therefore, as climate change is a global issue, it no longer makes sense to evaluate GHG emissions on a project-level.

For these reasons, Project GHG emissions levels presented in Table 5-6 are primarily for disclosure purposes because impact analysis for the Project follows the approach certified by South Coast AQMD in the Final Negative Declaration for the Phillips 66 Los Angeles Refinery Carson Plant – Crude Oil Storage Capacity Project on December 12, 2014 (South Coast AQMD, 2014). The approach used by South Coast AQMD to assess GHG impacts from that project recognizes that consumers of electricity and transportation fuels are, in effect, regulated by requiring providers and importers of electricity and fuel to participate in the GHG Cap-and-Trade Program and other Programs (e.g., low carbon fuel standard, renewable portfolio standard, etc.). Each such sector-wide program exists within the framework of AB 32 and its descendant laws the purpose of which is to achieve GHG emissions reductions consistent with the AB 32 Scoping Plan.

In summary, the Project would generate GHGs from electricity use and combustion of gasoline/diesel fuels, each of which is regulated near the top of the supply-chain. As such, each citizen of California (including the operator of the Project) will have no choice but to purchase electricity and fuels produced in a way that is acceptable to the California market. Thus, Project GHG emissions will be consistent with the relevant plan (i.e., AB 32 Scoping Plan). The Project would meet its fair share of the cost to mitigate the cumulative impact of global climate change because the Project would be purchasing energy from the California market. Thus, the Project would have a less than significant impact on applicable GHG reduction plans.

Nonetheless, GHG emissions impacts from implementing the Project were calculated at the Project-specific level for construction and operations as explained in the previous paragraphs. Impact analysis for the Project follows the approach certified by South Coast AQMD in the Final Negative Declaration for the Phillips 66 Los Angeles Refinery Carson Plant – Crude Oil Storage Capacity Project on December 12, 2014 (South Coast AQMD, 2014). In summary, this approach takes into account the cumulative nature of the energy industry and recognizes that consumers of electricity and diesel fuel are in effect regulated by higher level emissions restrictions on the producers of these energy sources. Therefore, the Project’s contribution to cumulative global climate change impacts would not be cumulatively considerable.

Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-9
Table 5-6. Estimated Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MT/Year) Source CO2 CH4 N2O Refrigerant CO2e
Mitigated Construction Emissions
Total 679 0.02 0.03 0.49 688
Mitigated Operational Emissions
Mobile Emissions 1,619 0.09 0.08 2.18 1,646
Area Emissions 2.45 0.00 0.00 - 2.46
Energy Emissions 317 0.03 0.00 - 318
Water Emissions 6.25 0.27 0.01 - 15.03
Waste Emissions 15.88 1.59 - - 55.56
Refrigerant Emissions - - - 0.25 0.25
Total Project Operational Emissions 1,960 1.98 0.08 2.43 2,037 Annualized Construction Emissions1 22.64 0.00 0.00 0.02 22.93 Project Emissions 1,983 1.98 0.08 2.44 2,060
*Note: 0.000 could represent <0.000
Per South Coast AQMD’s Methodology
The Project will not result in the emissions of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), or sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), the other gases identified as GHG in AB32. The proposed Project will be subject to any regulations developed under AB32 as determined by CARB.

5.9 Cumulative Impacts
CEQA Guidelines Section 15150 permits the incorporation by reference of portions or all of other documents that provide information relevant to the Proposed Project and the environmental analysis. Documents incorporated by reference must be available for public review at an office of the Lead Agency or other public building. The documents identified below are incorporated by reference, and where relevant, the information therein has been summarized in this report.

The Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report (Bakersfield 2002), provides relevant cumulative analysis in the proposed Project area, is a comprehensive document, and are hereby incorporated by references pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15150. The Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report can be reviewed at the City of Bakersfield’s Planning Division office:
1715 Chester Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301-5210
Monday through Friday
8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

The Proposed Project area is designated as an extreme nonattainment area for ozone and a nonattainment area for PM10 and PM2.5.

To evaluate cumulative impacts, a list approach is used, in accordance with Section 15130(b) of the CEQA Guidelines. The list approach may utilize either (1) a list of past, present, and probable future projects producing related or cumulative impacts, including, if necessary, those projects outside the control of the agency; or (2) a summary of projections contained in an adopted general plan or related planning document, or in a prior environmental document that has been adopted or certified, which described or evaluated regional or area-wide conditions contributing to the cumulative impact.

Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 5-10
The potential cumulative impacts from the Proposed Project and other projects are discussed below. A cumulative project list was incorporated by reference above from the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report (City of Bakersfield, 2002). Because the Basin is currently designated as “nonattainment” for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5, these projects could contribute to an existing or projected air quality exceedance, which would be a cumulative impact.

With regard to determining the significance of the contribution from the Proposed Project, the City of Bakersfield recommends that any given project’s potential contribution to cumulative impacts be assessed using the same significance criteria as for project-specific impacts. Therefore, individual projects that do not generate operational or construction emissions that exceed the SJVAPCD’s recommended daily or annual thresholds for project-specific impacts would also not cause a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants and, therefore, would not be considered to have a significant adverse air quality impact.

Therefore, the Proposed Project’s cumulative contribution is considered less than significant.

Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 6-1

6. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the criteria established by the City of Bakersfield’s Technical Studies Guidelines, SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI, and SJVAPCD’s SPAL guidelines, the proposed Project does not meet the minimum standards to require a full Air Quality Impact Analysis. Furthermore, the Project as proposed would not exceed the SJVAPCD’s criteria air pollutant emission levels and would generate less than significant air quality impacts.

Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants 7-1

7. REFERENCES
Bakersfield, City of. 2015. Technical Studies Guidelines, released October 27, 2015. https://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/265f75f5-bae8-40f9-8e34-7b01f8fc9d17 --------. 2002. Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan, December 2002. https://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/6c7a0380-7841-40d6-b3ef-23ceb4fa0fd7 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2022a. California Emissions Estimator Model™ (CalEEMod), version 2022.1, released April 2022.
--------. 2022b. User Guide for CalEEMod Version 2022.1. https://www.caleemod.com/user-guide California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Statute and Guidelines. 2025. (Public Resources Code 21000 to 21177) and CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 15000 – 15387).
--------. 2018. Appendix G – Environmental Checklist Form, Final Text. December 28, 2018.

Ruettgers & Schuler. 2021. Camino Media – Single Family Residential.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD). 2023. UStar Meteorological Datasets for Bakersfield 2018-2022. https://www.valleyair.org/permitting/air-dispersion-modeling/meteorologicaldata/ ----------. 2020. Small Project Analysis Level (SPAL) Memorandum. November 13, 2020. http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CEQA%20Rules/GAMAQI-SPAL.PDF -----------. 2015. Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI). March 19, 2015. http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/GAMAQI_3-19-15.pdf -----------. 2009. Guidance for Valley Land-use Agencies in Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for New Projects under CEQA. December 17, 2009.

Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants A-1
APPENDIX A. CALEEMOD EMISSIONS ESTIMATES OUTPUT
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 1 / 85
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated

3.2. Site Preparation (2025) - Mitigated

3.3. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 2 / 85

3.4. Grading (2025) - Mitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.6. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.8. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated

3.9. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated

3.10. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated

3.11. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated

3.12. Paving (2027) - Mitigated

3.13. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated

3.14. Architectural Coating (2027) - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 3 / 85

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.3.2. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.4.2. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.5.2. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 4 / 85

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 5 / 85

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.3.2. Mitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 6 / 85

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 7 / 85

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2.2. Mitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 8 / 85

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Camino Media - University Square
Construction Start Date 5/1/2025
Operational Year 2027
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.70
Precipitation (days) 18.0
Location 35.34461151822452, -119.11083654604438
County Kern-San Joaquin
City Bakersfield
Air District San Joaquin Valley APCD
Air Basin San Joaquin Valley
TAZ 2809
EDFZ 5
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.29

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Apartments Low
Rise
191 Dwelling Unit 9.40 202,460 121,093 — 615 —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 9 / 85
Parking Lot 185 Space 1.66 0.00 0.00 — — —
Recreational
Swimming Pool

1.70 1000sqft 0.04 1,700 0.00 — — —
Health Club 4.50 1000sqft 0.10 4,500 0.00 — — —
General Office
Building

1.50 1000sqft 0.03 1,500 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Construction C-10-A Water Exposed Surfaces
Construction C-10-C Water Unpaved Construction Roads
Construction C-11 Limit Vehicle Speeds on Unpaved Roads Energy E-10-B Establish Onsite Renewable Energy Systems: Solar Power

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 38.9 38.9 31.7 31.5 0.06 1.37 19.9 21.2 1.26 10.2 11.4 — 6,869 6,869 0.28 0.19 8.76 6,895 Mit. 38.9 38.9 31.7 31.5 0.06 1.37 5.32 6.69 1.26 2.68 3.93 — 6,869 6,869 0.28 0.19 8.76 6,895 %
Reduced
— — — — — — 73% 68% — 74% 66% — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.02 1.72 12.0 20.6 0.03 0.44 1.91 2.35 0.41 0.46 0.86 — 4,773 4,773 0.14 0.19 0.23 4,833 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 10 / 85
Mit. 2.02 1.72 12.0 20.6 0.03 0.44 1.91 2.35 0.41 0.46 0.86 — 4,773 4,773 0.14 0.19 0.23 4,833 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 3.96 3.92 10.2 17.6 0.02 0.41 2.96 3.37 0.37 1.16 1.53 — 4,102 4,102 0.11 0.16 2.94 4,156 Mit. 3.96 3.92 10.2 17.6 0.02 0.41 1.62 1.95 0.37 0.44 0.81 — 4,102 4,102 0.11 0.16 2.94 4,156 %
Reduced
— — — — — — 45% 42% — 62% 47% — — — — — — —
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.72 0.71 1.87 3.21 < 0.005 0.07 0.54 0.61 0.07 0.21 0.28 — 679 679 0.02 0.03 0.49 688 Mit. 0.72 0.71 1.87 3.21 < 0.005 0.07 0.30 0.36 0.07 0.08 0.15 — 679 679 0.02 0.03 0.49 688 %
Reduced
— — — — — — 45% 42% — 62% 47% — — — — — — —
Exceeds
(Annual)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshol
d
— 10.0 10.0 100 27.0 — — 15.0 — — 15.0 — — — — — — —
Unmit. — No No No No Yes — No Yes — No — — — — — — —
Mit. — No No No No Yes — No Yes — No — — — — — — —

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 4.03 3.39 31.7 31.5 0.06 1.37 19.9 21.2 1.26 10.2 11.4 — 6,869 6,869 0.28 0.19 8.76 6,895 2026 1.98 1.70 11.2 23.0 0.03 0.39 1.91 2.30 0.36 0.46 0.81 — 4,950 4,950 0.13 0.18 7.93 5,016 2027 38.9 38.9 6.99 10.9 0.01 0.30 0.34 0.48 0.27 0.08 0.32 — 1,705 1,705 0.06 0.02 1.10 1,713 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 11 / 85
Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 2.02 1.72 12.0 20.6 0.03 0.44 1.91 2.35 0.41 0.46 0.86 — 4,773 4,773 0.14 0.19 0.23 4,833 2026 1.92 1.63 11.3 19.9 0.03 0.39 1.91 2.30 0.36 0.46 0.81 — 4,723 4,723 0.14 0.19 0.21 4,782 2027 1.79 1.56 10.8 19.3 0.03 0.35 1.91 2.26 0.32 0.46 0.78 — 4,675 4,675 0.13 0.19 0.18 4,734 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 1.52 1.29 10.2 13.8 0.02 0.41 2.96 3.37 0.37 1.16 1.53 — 3,091 3,091 0.10 0.09 1.56 3,121 2026 1.65 1.41 9.64 17.6 0.02 0.33 1.62 1.95 0.31 0.39 0.69 — 4,102 4,102 0.11 0.16 2.94 4,156 2027 3.96 3.92 2.15 3.84 0.01 0.08 0.30 0.37 0.07 0.07 0.14 — 823 823 0.02 0.03 0.47 833 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.28 0.23 1.87 2.52 < 0.005 0.07 0.54 0.61 0.07 0.21 0.28 — 512 512 0.02 0.01 0.26 517 2026 0.30 0.26 1.76 3.21 < 0.005 0.06 0.30 0.36 0.06 0.07 0.13 — 679 679 0.02 0.03 0.49 688 2027 0.72 0.71 0.39 0.70 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.03 — 136 136 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 138

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 4.03 3.39 31.7 31.5 0.06 1.37 5.32 6.69 1.26 2.68 3.93 — 6,869 6,869 0.28 0.19 8.76 6,895 2026 1.98 1.70 11.2 23.0 0.03 0.39 1.91 2.30 0.36 0.46 0.81 — 4,950 4,950 0.13 0.18 7.93 5,016 2027 38.9 38.9 6.99 10.9 0.01 0.30 0.34 0.48 0.27 0.08 0.32 — 1,705 1,705 0.06 0.02 1.10 1,713 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 2.02 1.72 12.0 20.6 0.03 0.44 1.91 2.35 0.41 0.46 0.86 — 4,773 4,773 0.14 0.19 0.23 4,833 2026 1.92 1.63 11.3 19.9 0.03 0.39 1.91 2.30 0.36 0.46 0.81 — 4,723 4,723 0.14 0.19 0.21 4,782 2027 1.79 1.56 10.8 19.3 0.03 0.35 1.91 2.26 0.32 0.46 0.78 — 4,675 4,675 0.13 0.19 0.18 4,734 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 12 / 85
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 1.52 1.29 10.2 13.8 0.02 0.41 1.35 1.76 0.37 0.44 0.81 — 3,091 3,091 0.10 0.09 1.56 3,121 2026 1.65 1.41 9.64 17.6 0.02 0.33 1.62 1.95 0.31 0.39 0.69 — 4,102 4,102 0.11 0.16 2.94 4,156 2027 3.96 3.92 2.15 3.84 0.01 0.08 0.30 0.37 0.07 0.07 0.14 — 823 823 0.02 0.03 0.47 833 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.28 0.23 1.87 2.52 < 0.005 0.07 0.25 0.32 0.07 0.08 0.15 — 512 512 0.02 0.01 0.26 517 2026 0.30 0.26 1.76 3.21 < 0.005 0.06 0.30 0.36 0.06 0.07 0.13 — 679 679 0.02 0.03 0.49 688 2027 0.72 0.71 0.39 0.70 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.03 — 136 136 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 138

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 11.0 10.3 5.33 57.3 0.11 0.18 9.31 9.49 0.17 2.35 2.53 112 13,017 13,129 12.0 0.49 32.0 13,608 Mit. 11.0 10.3 5.33 57.3 0.11 0.18 9.31 9.49 0.17 2.35 2.53 112 12,550 12,662 11.9 0.48 32.0 13,136 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — 4% 4% 1% 2% — 3%
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 9.32 8.74 5.86 35.9 0.10 0.17 9.31 9.49 0.17 2.35 2.52 112 11,873 11,985 12.1 0.53 2.27 12,446 Mit. 9.32 8.74 5.86 35.9 0.10 0.17 9.31 9.49 0.17 2.35 2.52 112 11,406 11,518 12.0 0.52 2.27 11,974 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — 4% 4% 1% 2% — 4%
Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 9.92 9.31 5.59 42.6 0.10 0.18 9.20 9.38 0.17 2.33 2.50 112 12,196 12,308 12.0 0.51 14.7 12,775 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 13 / 85
Mit. 9.92 9.31 5.59 42.6 0.10 0.18 9.20 9.38 0.17 2.33 2.50 112 11,729 11,841 11.9 0.50 14.7 12,303 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — 4% 4% 1% 2% — 4%
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.81 1.70 1.02 7.78 0.02 0.03 1.68 1.71 0.03 0.42 0.46 18.5 2,019 2,038 1.99 0.08 2.43 2,115 Mit. 1.81 1.70 1.02 7.78 0.02 0.03 1.68 1.71 0.03 0.42 0.46 18.5 1,942 1,960 1.98 0.08 2.43 2,037 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — 4% 4% 1% 2% — 4%
Exceeds
(Annual)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshol
d
— 10.0 10.0 100 27.0 — — 15.0 — — 15.0 — — — — — — —
Unmit. — No No No No — — No — — No — — — — — — —
Mit. — No No No No — — No — — No — — — — — — —

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.93 4.44 3.83 45.6 0.10 0.06 9.31 9.37 0.06 2.35 2.41 — 10,585 10,585 0.51 0.44 30.5 10,759 Area 5.88 5.82 0.11 11.1 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 30.0 30.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.2 Energy 0.16 0.08 1.40 0.62 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,380 2,380 0.26 0.02 — 2,391 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 16.1 21.7 37.8 1.65 0.04 — 90.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 95.9 0.00 95.9 9.59 0.00 — 336 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.48 1.48
Total 11.0 10.3 5.33 57.3 0.11 0.18 9.31 9.49 0.17 2.35 2.53 112 13,017 13,129 12.0 0.49 32.0 13,608 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 14 / 85
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Mobile 4.33 3.83 4.46 35.3 0.09 0.06 9.31 9.37 0.06 2.35 2.41 — 9,471 9,471 0.56 0.47 0.79 9,627 Area 4.83 4.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Energy 0.16 0.08 1.40 0.62 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,380 2,380 0.26 0.02 — 2,391 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 16.1 21.7 37.8 1.65 0.04 — 90.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 95.9 0.00 95.9 9.59 0.00 — 336 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.48 1.48
Total 9.32 8.74 5.86 35.9 0.10 0.17 9.31 9.49 0.17 2.35 2.52 112 11,873 11,985 12.1 0.53 2.27 12,446 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.41 3.92 4.13 36.5 0.10 0.06 9.20 9.27 0.06 2.33 2.38 — 9,779 9,779 0.53 0.45 13.2 9,941 Area 5.35 5.32 0.05 5.48 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 14.8 14.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.9 Energy 0.16 0.08 1.40 0.62 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,380 2,380 0.26 0.02 — 2,391 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 16.1 21.7 37.8 1.65 0.04 — 90.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 95.9 0.00 95.9 9.59 0.00 — 336 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.48 1.48
Total 9.92 9.31 5.59 42.6 0.10 0.18 9.20 9.38 0.17 2.33 2.50 112 12,196 12,308 12.0 0.51 14.7 12,775 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.80 0.71 0.75 6.67 0.02 0.01 1.68 1.69 0.01 0.42 0.44 — 1,619 1,619 0.09 0.08 2.18 1,646 Area 0.98 0.97 0.01 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 2.45 2.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.46 Energy 0.03 0.01 0.26 0.11 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 394 394 0.04 < 0.005 — 396 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.66 3.59 6.25 0.27 0.01 — 15.0 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 15.9 0.00 15.9 1.59 0.00 — 55.6 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.25 0.25
Total 1.81 1.70 1.02 7.78 0.02 0.03 1.68 1.71 0.03 0.42 0.46 18.5 2,019 2,038 1.99 0.08 2.43 2,115

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 15 / 85
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.93 4.44 3.83 45.6 0.10 0.06 9.31 9.37 0.06 2.35 2.41 — 10,585 10,585 0.51 0.44 30.5 10,759 Area 5.88 5.82 0.11 11.1 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 30.0 30.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.2 Energy 0.16 0.08 1.40 0.62 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,913 1,913 0.18 0.01 — 1,919 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 16.1 21.7 37.8 1.65 0.04 — 90.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 95.9 0.00 95.9 9.59 0.00 — 336 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.48 1.48
Total 11.0 10.3 5.33 57.3 0.11 0.18 9.31 9.49 0.17 2.35 2.53 112 12,550 12,662 11.9 0.48 32.0 13,136 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.33 3.83 4.46 35.3 0.09 0.06 9.31 9.37 0.06 2.35 2.41 — 9,471 9,471 0.56 0.47 0.79 9,627 Area 4.83 4.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Energy 0.16 0.08 1.40 0.62 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,913 1,913 0.18 0.01 — 1,919 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 16.1 21.7 37.8 1.65 0.04 — 90.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 95.9 0.00 95.9 9.59 0.00 — 336 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.48 1.48
Total 9.32 8.74 5.86 35.9 0.10 0.17 9.31 9.49 0.17 2.35 2.52 112 11,406 11,518 12.0 0.52 2.27 11,974 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.41 3.92 4.13 36.5 0.10 0.06 9.20 9.27 0.06 2.33 2.38 — 9,779 9,779 0.53 0.45 13.2 9,941 Area 5.35 5.32 0.05 5.48 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 14.8 14.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.9 Energy 0.16 0.08 1.40 0.62 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,913 1,913 0.18 0.01 — 1,919 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 16.1 21.7 37.8 1.65 0.04 — 90.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 95.9 0.00 95.9 9.59 0.00 — 336 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.48 1.48
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 16 / 85
Total 9.92 9.31 5.59 42.6 0.10 0.18 9.20 9.38 0.17 2.33 2.50 112 11,729 11,841 11.9 0.50 14.7 12,303 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.80 0.71 0.75 6.67 0.02 0.01 1.68 1.69 0.01 0.42 0.44 — 1,619 1,619 0.09 0.08 2.18 1,646 Area 0.98 0.97 0.01 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 2.45 2.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.46 Energy 0.03 0.01 0.26 0.11 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 317 317 0.03 < 0.005 — 318 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.66 3.59 6.25 0.27 0.01 — 15.0 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 15.9 0.00 15.9 1.59 0.00 — 55.6 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.25 0.25
Total 1.81 1.70 1.02 7.78 0.02 0.03 1.68 1.71 0.03 0.42 0.46 18.5 1,942 1,960 1.98 0.08 2.43 2,037

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

3.94 3.31 31.6 30.2 0.05 1.37 — 1.37 1.26 — 1.26 — 5,295 5,295 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 19.7 19.7 — 10.1 10.1 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 17 / 85
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.18 0.15 1.47 1.41 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 247 247 0.01 < 0.005 — 247 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.92 0.92 — 0.47 0.47 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.03 0.03 0.27 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 40.8 40.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 41.0 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.17 0.17 — 0.09 0.09 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.07 1.32 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 236 236 0.01 0.01 0.85 240 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 10.2 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 18 / 85
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.68 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.2. Site Preparation (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

3.94 3.31 31.6 30.2 0.05 1.37 — 1.37 1.26 — 1.26 — 5,295 5,295 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 5.11 5.11 — 2.63 2.63 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.18 0.15 1.47 1.41 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 247 247 0.01 < 0.005 — 247 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 19 / 85
Dust — — — — — — 0.24 0.24 — 0.12 0.12 — — — — — — —
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.03 0.03 0.27 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 40.8 40.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 41.0 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.04 0.04 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.07 1.32 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 236 236 0.01 0.01 0.85 240 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 10.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.68 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 20 / 85
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

3.80 3.20 29.7 28.3 0.06 1.23 — 1.23 1.14 — 1.14 — 6,599 6,599 0.27 0.05 — 6,622 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 9.20 9.20 — 3.65 3.65 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.52 0.44 4.07 3.88 0.01 0.17 — 0.17 0.16 — 0.16 — 904 904 0.04 0.01 — 907 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.26 1.26 — 0.50 0.50 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 21 / 85
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.10 0.08 0.74 0.71 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 150 150 0.01 < 0.005 — 150 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.23 0.23 — 0.09 0.09 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10 0.09 0.08 1.51 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 270 270 0.01 0.01 0.97 274 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 33.7 33.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 34.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.57 5.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.65 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.4. Grading (2025) - Mitigated
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 22 / 85
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

3.80 3.20 29.7 28.3 0.06 1.23 — 1.23 1.14 — 1.14 — 6,599 6,599 0.27 0.05 — 6,622 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 2.39 2.39 — 0.95 0.95 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.52 0.44 4.07 3.88 0.01 0.17 — 0.17 0.16 — 0.16 — 904 904 0.04 0.01 — 907 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.33 0.33 — 0.13 0.13 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.10 0.08 0.74 0.71 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 150 150 0.01 < 0.005 — 150 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 23 / 85
Dust — — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — —
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 24 / 85
Daily,——————————————————
Summer
(Max)
Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent

1.35 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43— 0.43 0.40— 0.40— 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent

1.35 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43— 0.43 0.40— 0.40— 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent

0.53 0.44 4.10 5.11 0.01 0.17— 0.17 0.16— 0.16— 940 940 0.04 0.01— 944 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual——————————————————
Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent

0.10 0.08 0.75 0.93 < 0.005 0.03— 0.03 0.03— 0.03— 156 156 0.01 < 0.005— 156 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 25 / 85
Worker 0.72 0.66 0.58 10.6 0.00 0.00 1.72 1.72 0.00 0.40 0.40 — 1,896 1,896 0.08 0.07 6.80 1,925 Vendor 0.03 0.02 0.81 0.27 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 711 711 0.01 0.11 1.96 745 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.64 0.57 0.71 7.28 0.00 0.00 1.72 1.72 0.00 0.40 0.40 — 1,663 1,663 0.03 0.07 0.18 1,684 Vendor 0.03 0.02 0.87 0.27 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 712 712 0.01 0.11 0.05 744 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.26 0.23 0.25 3.10 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.67 0.00 0.16 0.16 — 678 678 0.01 0.03 1.15 687 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.33 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 279 279 < 0.005 0.04 0.33 292 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 112 112 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 114 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 46.2 46.2 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 48.3 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.6. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.35 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 26 / 85
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent

1.35 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43— 0.43 0.40— 0.40— 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent

0.53 0.44 4.10 5.11 0.01 0.17— 0.17 0.16— 0.16— 940 940 0.04 0.01— 944 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual——————————————————
Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent

0.10 0.08 0.75 0.93 < 0.005 0.03— 0.03 0.03— 0.03— 156 156 0.01 < 0.005— 156 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.72 0.66 0.58 10.6 0.00 0.00 1.72 1.72 0.00 0.40 0.40— 1,896 1,896 0.08 0.07 6.80 1,925 Vendor 0.03 0.02 0.81 0.27 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06— 711 711 0.01 0.11 1.96 745 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 27 / 85
Worker 0.64 0.57 0.71 7.28 0.00 0.00 1.72 1.72 0.00 0.40 0.40 — 1,663 1,663 0.03 0.07 0.18 1,684 Vendor 0.03 0.02 0.87 0.27 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 712 712 0.01 0.11 0.05 744 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.26 0.23 0.25 3.10 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.67 0.00 0.16 0.16 — 678 678 0.01 0.03 1.15 687 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.33 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 279 279 < 0.005 0.04 0.33 292 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 112 112 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 114 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 46.2 46.2 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 48.3 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.28 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 28 / 85
Off-Roa 1.28 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 d
Equipm
ent
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.10 0.92 8.45 11.1 0.02 0.32 — 0.32 0.30 — 0.30 — 2,055 2,055 0.08 0.02 — 2,062 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.20 0.17 1.54 2.03 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 340 340 0.01 < 0.005 — 341 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.67 0.61 0.53 9.76 0.00 0.00 1.72 1.72 0.00 0.40 0.40 — 1,856 1,856 0.02 0.06 6.12 1,881 Vendor 0.03 0.02 0.78 0.25 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 697 697 0.01 0.10 1.81 729 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.61 0.54 0.65 6.67 0.00 0.00 1.72 1.72 0.00 0.40 0.40 — 1,628 1,628 0.03 0.07 0.16 1,649 Vendor 0.03 0.02 0.83 0.26 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 698 698 0.01 0.10 0.05 728 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 29 / 85
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Worker 0.53 0.47 0.50 6.24 0.00 0.00 1.46 1.46 0.00 0.34 0.34 — 1,450 1,450 0.02 0.06 2.27 1,469 Vendor 0.02 0.02 0.70 0.22 < 0.005 0.01 0.16 0.17 0.01 0.05 0.05 — 598 598 0.01 0.09 0.67 624 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10 0.09 0.09 1.14 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 240 240 < 0.005 0.01 0.38 243 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 99.0 99.0 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 103 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.8. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.28 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.28 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 30 / 85
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.10 0.92 8.45 11.1 0.02 0.32 — 0.32 0.30 — 0.30 — 2,055 2,055 0.08 0.02 — 2,062 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.20 0.17 1.54 2.03 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 340 340 0.01 < 0.005 — 341 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.67 0.61 0.53 9.76 0.00 0.00 1.72 1.72 0.00 0.40 0.40 — 1,856 1,856 0.02 0.06 6.12 1,881 Vendor 0.03 0.02 0.78 0.25 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 697 697 0.01 0.10 1.81 729 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.61 0.54 0.65 6.67 0.00 0.00 1.72 1.72 0.00 0.40 0.40 — 1,628 1,628 0.03 0.07 0.16 1,649 Vendor 0.03 0.02 0.83 0.26 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 698 698 0.01 0.10 0.05 728 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.53 0.47 0.50 6.24 0.00 0.00 1.46 1.46 0.00 0.34 0.34 — 1,450 1,450 0.02 0.06 2.27 1,469 Vendor 0.02 0.02 0.70 0.22 < 0.005 0.01 0.16 0.17 0.01 0.05 0.05 — 598 598 0.01 0.09 0.67 624 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 31 / 85
Worker 0.10 0.09 0.09 1.14 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 240 240 < 0.005 0.01 0.38 243 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 99.0 99.0 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 103 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.23 1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.16 0.14 1.23 1.70 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 315 315 0.01 < 0.005 — 316 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.03 0.02 0.23 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 52.2 52.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 52.4 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 32 / 85
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.53 0.51 0.59 6.12 0.00 0.00 1.72 1.72 0.00 0.40 0.40 — 1,596 1,596 0.03 0.07 0.14 1,616 Vendor 0.03 0.02 0.80 0.25 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 682 682 0.01 0.10 0.04 712 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 218 218 < 0.005 0.01 0.31 221 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 89.7 89.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.09 93.7 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 36.1 36.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 36.6 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.8 14.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 15.5 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.10. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 33 / 85
Off-Roa
Equipment

1.23 1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.16 0.14 1.23 1.70 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 315 315 0.01 < 0.005 — 316 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.03 0.02 0.23 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 52.2 52.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 52.4 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.53 0.51 0.59 6.12 0.00 0.00 1.72 1.72 0.00 0.40 0.40 — 1,596 1,596 0.03 0.07 0.14 1,616 Vendor 0.03 0.02 0.80 0.25 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 682 682 0.01 0.10 0.04 712 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 218 218 < 0.005 0.01 0.31 221 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 89.7 89.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.09 93.7 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 34 / 85
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 36.1 36.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 36.6 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.8 14.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 15.5 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.88 0.74 6.94 9.95 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.13 0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.88 0.74 6.94 9.95 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.13 0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 35 / 85
Off-Roa 0.08 0.07 0.65 0.93 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 141 141 0.01 < 0.005 — 141 d
Equipm
ent
Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.17 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 23.3 23.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 23.4 Paving < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 194 194 < 0.005 0.01 0.59 197 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 170 170 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 172 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.5 16.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 16.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 36 / 85
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.73 2.73 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.76 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.12. Paving (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.88 0.74 6.94 9.95 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.13 0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.88 0.74 6.94 9.95 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.13 0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 37 / 85
Off-Roa 0.08 0.07 0.65 0.93 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 141 141 0.01 < 0.005 — 141 d
Equipm
ent
Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.17 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 23.3 23.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 23.4 Paving < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 194 194 < 0.005 0.01 0.59 197 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 170 170 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 172 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.5 16.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 16.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 38 / 85
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.73 2.73 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.76 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.14 0.11 0.83 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coating
s

38.7 38.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 12.4 12.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.5 Architect
ural
Coating
s

3.60 3.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 39 / 85
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.06 2.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.07 Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.66 0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.12 0.12 0.09 1.80 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.08 0.08 — 364 364 < 0.005 0.01 1.10 369 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 30.9 30.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 31.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.11 5.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.18 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 40 / 85

3.14. Architectural Coating (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.14 0.11 0.83 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coating
s

38.7 38.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 12.4 12.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.5 Architect
ural
Coating
s

3.60 3.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 41 / 85
Off-Roa < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.06 2.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.07 d
Equipm
ent
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.66 0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

4. Operations Emissions Details
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 42 / 85

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise

4.93 4.44 3.83 45.6 0.10 0.06 9.31 9.37 0.06 2.35 2.41 — 10,585 10,585 0.51 0.44 30.5 10,759 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Health
Club

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 General
Office
Building

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4.93 4.44 3.83 45.6 0.10 0.06 9.31 9.37 0.06 2.35 2.41 — 10,585 10,585 0.51 0.44 30.5 10,759 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise

4.33 3.83 4.46 35.3 0.09 0.06 9.31 9.37 0.06 2.35 2.41 — 9,471 9,471 0.56 0.47 0.79 9,627 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 43 / 85
Recreati 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 onal
Swimmi
ng
Health
Club

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 General
Office
Building

0.80 0.71 0.75 6.67 0.02 0.01 1.68 1.69 0.01 0.42 0.44 — 1,619 1,619 0.09 0.08 2.18 1,646 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Health
Club

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 General
Office
Building

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.80 0.71 0.75 6.67 0.02 0.01 1.68 1.69 0.01 0.42 0.44 — 1,619 1,619 0.09 0.08 2.18 1,646

4.1.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 44 / 85
Apartme
Low
Rise

4.93 4.44 3.83 45.6 0.10 0.06 9.31 9.37 0.06 2.35 2.41— 10,585 10,585 0.51 0.44 30.5 10,759 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Health
Club

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 General
Office
Building

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4.93 4.44 3.83 45.6 0.10 0.06 9.31 9.37 0.06 2.35 2.41— 10,585 10,585 0.51 0.44 30.5 10,759 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
Low Rise

4.33 3.83 4.46 35.3 0.09 0.06 9.31 9.37 0.06 2.35 2.41— 9,471 9,471 0.56 0.47 0.79 9,627 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Health
Club

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 General
Office
Building

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4.33 3.83 4.46 35.3 0.09 0.06 9.31 9.37 0.06 2.35 2.41— 9,471 9,471 0.56 0.47 0.79 9,627 Annual——————————————————
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 45 / 85
Apartme 0.80 0.71 0.75 6.67 0.02 0.01 1.68 1.69 0.01 0.42 0.44 — 1,619 1,619 0.09 0.08 2.18 1,646 nts
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Health
Club

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 General
Office
Building

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.80 0.71 0.75 6.67 0.02 0.01 1.68 1.69 0.01 0.42 0.44 — 1,619 1,619 0.09 0.08 2.18 1,646

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 525 525 0.08 0.01 — 530
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 35.5 35.5 0.01 < 0.005 — 35.9
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 46 / 85
Health
Club
———————————— 29.8 29.8 < 0.005 < 0.005— 30.1
General
Office
Building
———————————— 19.7 19.7 < 0.005 < 0.005— 19.8
Total———————————— 610 610 0.10 0.01— 616
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
———————————— 525 525 0.08 0.01— 530
Parking
Lot
———————————— 35.5 35.5 0.01 < 0.005— 35.9
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
———————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Health
Club
———————————— 29.8 29.8 < 0.005 < 0.005— 30.1
General
Office
Building
———————————— 19.7 19.7 < 0.005 < 0.005— 19.8
Total———————————— 610 610 0.10 0.01— 616
Annual——————————————————
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
———————————— 86.9 86.9 0.01 < 0.005— 87.7
Parking
Lot
———————————— 5.88 5.88 < 0.005 < 0.005— 5.94
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
———————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 47 / 85
Health — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.94 4.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.99 Club
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 3.25 3.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.29 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 101 101 0.02 < 0.005 — 102

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 57.1 57.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 57.7
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 35.5 35.5 0.01 < 0.005 — 35.9
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — 29.8 29.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.1 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 19.7 19.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.8 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 142 142 0.02 < 0.005 — 143 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 57.1 57.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 57.7
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 48 / 85
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 35.5 35.5 0.01 < 0.005 — 35.9
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — 29.8 29.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.1 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 19.7 19.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.8 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 142 142 0.02 < 0.005 — 143 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 9.45 9.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.55 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5.88 5.88 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.94 Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — 4.94 4.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.99 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 3.25 3.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.29 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 23.5 23.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 23.8

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 49 / 85
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise

0.16 0.08 1.33 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,692 1,692 0.15 < 0.005 — 1,697 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Health
Club

0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 59.1 59.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 59.3 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 19.2 19.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.3 Total 0.16 0.08 1.40 0.62 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,771 1,771 0.16 < 0.005 — 1,776 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise

0.16 0.08 1.33 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,692 1,692 0.15 < 0.005 — 1,697 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Health
Club

0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 59.1 59.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 59.3 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 19.2 19.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.3 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 50 / 85
Total 0.16 0.08 1.40 0.62 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,771 1,771 0.16 < 0.005 — 1,776 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise

0.03 0.01 0.24 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 280 280 0.02 < 0.005 — 281 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Health
Club
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.78 9.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.81 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.18 3.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.19 Total 0.03 0.01 0.26 0.11 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 293 293 0.03 < 0.005 — 294

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise

0.16 0.08 1.33 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,692 1,692 0.15 < 0.005 — 1,697 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 51 / 85
Health
Club

0.16 0.08 1.33 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,692 1,692 0.15 < 0.005 — 1,697 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Health
Club

0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 59.1 59.1 0.01 < 0.005 — 59.3 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 19.2 19.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.3 Total 0.16 0.08 1.40 0.62 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,771 1,771 0.16 < 0.005 — 1,776 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise

0.03 0.01 0.24 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 280 280 0.02 < 0.005 — 281 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 52 / 85
Health < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.78 9.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.81 Club
General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.18 3.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.19 Total 0.03 0.01 0.26 0.11 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 293 293 0.03 < 0.005 — 294

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consum
er
Product
s

4.47 4.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.36 0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

1.05 0.99 0.11 11.1 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 30.0 30.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.2 Total 5.88 5.82 0.11 11.1 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 30.0 30.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.2 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 53 / 85
Consum 4.47 4.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
er
Product
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.36 0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 4.83 4.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consum
er
Product
s

0.82 0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.07 0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

0.09 0.09 0.01 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.45 2.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.46 Total 0.98 0.97 0.01 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 2.45 2.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.46

4.3.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Consum
er
Product
s

4.47 4.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 54 / 85
Architect
Coatings

0.36 0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

4.47 4.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.82 0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.07 0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 14.8 20.3 35.2 1.53 0.04 — 84.2
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.19 0.22 0.41 0.02 < 0.005 — 1.05 Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.51 0.59 1.10 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.78 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.51 0.59 1.10 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.78 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 16.1 21.7 37.8 1.65 0.04 — 90.8 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 14.8 20.3 35.2 1.53 0.04 — 84.2
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 56 / 85
Recreati — — — — — — — — — — — 0.19 0.22 0.41 0.02 < 0.005 — 1.05 onal
Swimmi
ng
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.51 0.59 1.10 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.78 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.51 0.59 1.10 0.05 < 0.005 — 2.78 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 16.1 21.7 37.8 1.65 0.04 — 90.8 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.46 3.36 5.82 0.25 0.01 — 13.9
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.03 0.04 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.17 Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.08 0.10 0.18 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.46 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.08 0.10 0.18 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.46 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.66 3.59 6.25 0.27 0.01 — 15.0

4.4.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 57 / 85
Apartme
Low
Rise
——————————— 14.8 20.3 35.2 1.53 0.04— 84.2
Parking
Lot
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
——————————— 0.19 0.22 0.41 0.02 < 0.005— 1.05
Health
Club
——————————— 0.51 0.59 1.10 0.05 < 0.005— 2.78
General
Office
Building
——————————— 0.51 0.59 1.10 0.05 < 0.005— 2.78
Total——————————— 16.1 21.7 37.8 1.65 0.04— 90.8
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
——————————— 14.8 20.3 35.2 1.53 0.04— 84.2
Parking
Lot
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
——————————— 0.19 0.22 0.41 0.02 < 0.005— 1.05
Health
Club
——————————— 0.51 0.59 1.10 0.05 < 0.005— 2.78
General
Office
Building
——————————— 0.51 0.59 1.10 0.05 < 0.005— 2.78
Total——————————— 16.1 21.7 37.8 1.65 0.04— 90.8
Annual——————————————————
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 58 / 85
Apartme — — — — — — — — — — — 2.46 3.36 5.82 0.25 0.01 — 13.9 nts
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.03 0.04 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.17 Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.08 0.10 0.18 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.46 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.08 0.10 0.18 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.46 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 2.66 3.59 6.25 0.27 0.01 — 15.0

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 76.1 0.00 76.1 7.61 0.00 — 266
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — 5.22 0.00 5.22 0.52 0.00 — 18.3
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 59 / 85
Health
Club
——————————— 13.8 0.00 13.8 1.38 0.00— 48.4
General
Office
Building
——————————— 0.75 0.00 0.75 0.08 0.00— 2.63
Total——————————— 95.9 0.00 95.9 9.59 0.00— 336
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
——————————— 76.1 0.00 76.1 7.61 0.00— 266
Parking
Lot
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
——————————— 5.22 0.00 5.22 0.52 0.00— 18.3
Health
Club
——————————— 13.8 0.00 13.8 1.38 0.00— 48.4
General
Office
Building
——————————— 0.75 0.00 0.75 0.08 0.00— 2.63
Total——————————— 95.9 0.00 95.9 9.59 0.00— 336
Annual——————————————————
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
——————————— 12.6 0.00 12.6 1.26 0.00— 44.1
Parking
Lot
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
——————————— 0.86 0.00 0.86 0.09 0.00— 3.02
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 60 / 85
Health — — — — — — — — — — — 2.29 0.00 2.29 0.23 0.00 — 8.01 Club
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.00 — 0.44
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 15.9 0.00 15.9 1.59 0.00 — 55.6

4.5.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 76.1 0.00 76.1 7.61 0.00 — 266
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — 5.22 0.00 5.22 0.52 0.00 — 18.3
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — 13.8 0.00 13.8 1.38 0.00 — 48.4
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.75 0.00 0.75 0.08 0.00 — 2.63
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 95.9 0.00 95.9 9.59 0.00 — 336 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 76.1 0.00 76.1 7.61 0.00 — 266
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 61 / 85
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — 5.22 0.00 5.22 0.52 0.00 — 18.3
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — 13.8 0.00 13.8 1.38 0.00 — 48.4
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.75 0.00 0.75 0.08 0.00 — 2.63
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 95.9 0.00 95.9 9.59 0.00 — 336 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 12.6 0.00 12.6 1.26 0.00 — 44.1
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.86 0.00 0.86 0.09 0.00 — 3.02
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.29 0.00 2.29 0.23 0.00 — 8.01
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.00 — 0.44
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 15.9 0.00 15.9 1.59 0.00 — 55.6

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 62 / 85
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.45 1.45
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.48 1.48
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.45 1.45
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.48 1.48
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 63 / 85
Apartme
Low
Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.24 0.24
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.25 0.25

4.6.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.45 1.45
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.48 1.48
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 64 / 85
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.45 1.45
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.48 1.48
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Low Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.24 0.24
Recreati
onal
Swimmi
ng
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.25 0.25

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 65 / 85
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.7.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 66 / 85

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 67 / 85

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 68 / 85
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetati
on
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 69 / 85
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 70 / 85
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetati
on
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 71 / 85
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 72 / 85
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/1/2025 5/20/2025 6.00 17.0 — Grading Grading 5/21/2025 7/17/2025 6.00 50.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 7/18/2025 2/25/2027 6.00 504 — Paving Paving 2/26/2027 4/6/2027 6.00 34.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/7/2027 5/15/2027 6.00 34.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 73 / 85
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.2.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 74 / 85
Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 17.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 10.6 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 20.0 17.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 10.6 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 141 17.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 21.7 10.6 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 75 / 85
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 17.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 10.6 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 28.1 17.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.6 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.3.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 17.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 10.6 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 20.0 17.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 10.6 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 141 17.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 21.7 10.6 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 76 / 85
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 17.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 10.6 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 28.1 17.3 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.6 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 409,982 136,661 9,000 3,000 4,352

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Site Preparation — — 25.5 0.00 —
Grading — — 150 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.66
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 77 / 85

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Apartments Low Rise — 0%
Parking Lot 1.66 100%
Recreational Swimming Pool 0.00 0%
Health Club 0.00 0%
General Office Building 0.00 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2026 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2027 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2025 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Low
Rise
1,403 1,403 1,403 512,092 13,286 13,286 13,286 4,849,547 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Recreational
Swimming Pool

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Health Club 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 78 / 85
General Office 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Building

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Low
Rise
1,403 1,403 1,403 512,092 13,286 13,286 13,286 4,849,547 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Recreational
Swimming Pool

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Health Club 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
General Office
Building

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Low Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 0
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 0
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 79 / 85

5.10.1.2. Mitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Low Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 0
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 0
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
409981.5 136,661 9,000 3,000 4,352

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 80 / 85

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Low Rise 938,745 204 0.0330 0.0040 5,281,050 Parking Lot 63,534 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Recreational Swimming Pool 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Health Club 53,389 204 0.0330 0.0040 184,375
General Office Building 35,170 204 0.0330 0.0040 59,909

5.11.2. Mitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Low Rise 102,165 204 0.0330 0.0040 5,281,050 Parking Lot 63,534 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Recreational Swimming Pool 0.00 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Health Club 53,389 204 0.0330 0.0040 184,375
General Office Building 35,170 204 0.0330 0.0040 59,909

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Low Rise 7,744,639 2,413,872
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Recreational Swimming Pool 100,543 0.00
Health Club 266,144 0.00
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 81 / 85
General Office Building 266,601 0.00

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Low Rise 7,744,639 2,413,872
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Recreational Swimming Pool 100,543 0.00
Health Club 266,144 0.00
General Office Building 266,601 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Low Rise 141 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —
Recreational Swimming Pool 9.69 —
Health Club 25.6 —
General Office Building 1.40 —

5.13.2. Mitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Low Rise 141 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —
Recreational Swimming Pool 9.69 —
Health Club 25.6 —
General Office Building 1.40 —
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 82 / 85

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Apartments Low Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Low Rise Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Recreational
Swimming Pool
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Recreational
Swimming Pool
Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Health Club Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Health Club Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
General Office
Building
Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
General Office
Building
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Apartments Low Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Low Rise Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 83 / 85
Recreational
Swimming Pool
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Recreational
Swimming Pool
Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Health Club Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Health Club Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
General Office
Building
Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
General Office
Building
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.15.2. Mitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr) Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 84 / 85

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
Camino Media - University Square Custom Report, 5/27/2025 85 / 85
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use The lot acreage was updated based on site plan.

Construction: Construction Phases Construction phase length updates to accurately reflect project timelines.

Operations: Hearths No woodstoves/fireplaces
Operations: Vehicle Data Updated trip rate for residential per trip generation letter. Other land uses are only intended for residents and would not require additional trips.

Operations: Fleet Mix Updated to match SJVAPCD residential fleet mix for 2027.

Camino Media – University Square / Small Project Analysis Level Assessment Trinity Consultants B-1
APPENDIX B. HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MODELING FILES
(Electronic Files)
P:\PROJECTS\21003.01-CAMTOWN\Studies\Traffic\2100301ts01.docx May 29, 2025
City of Bakersfield, Public Works Department
Traffic Engineering
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Re: Zone Change No. 25-0001 for approximately 11.22 acres located on the north side of Camino Media, east of Old River Road. Also identified as Parcels H & I of P.M.W. No. 17-0426, Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNS) 390-300-29 & 30. Located in a portion of Section 6, T30S, R27E, M.D.M. McIntosh & Associates Job No. 21-003.01
Please consider the following information provided, as justification for an exemption from the requirement to perform an independent traffic impact analysis for the subject Zone Change. In August of 2021, Ruettgers and Schuler prepared a traffic evaluation for the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change No. 21-0302 from Office Commercial (OC) and Professional and Administrative Office Zone (C-O) to High Medium Density Residential (HMR) and Limited Multiple-Family Dwelling with PUD overlay (R-2/PUD). The project proposes to further revise the zoning on the entire 11.22 gross acres to be consistent with the revised City of Bakersfield municipal code Title 17. The land use designation will remain High Medium Density Residential (HMR). The proposed zoning is for High Density Multi-Unit Dwelling Zone (R-4).

The attached Tables 1, 2 and 3 indicate updated trip generation calculations using the “Institute of Transportation Engineers” Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition for the proposed Zone Change. Table 1 indicates that the proposed zoning will result in a P.M. Peak Hour trip generation of 103 Trip Ends. For the A.M. Peak Hour, Table 3 indicates the proposed zoning will result in an A.M. Peak Hour trip generation of 82 Trip Ends. These trip generation numbers are less than the original traffic evaluation prepared by Ruettgers and Schuler. Table 2 indicates similar trip generation calculations for Daily Traffic volumes as compared to the previous analysis.

Since this proposed revision to the zoning will have less traffic than the current use, the project should be exempted from performing a detailed traffic impact analysis in accordance with the City’s “Methodology for Independent Assessment of Regional Impact Fees”. The project applicant would therefore like to request that the Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) fixed rate fee schedule be used for computation of required impact fees for the project.

P:\PROJECTS\21003.01-CAMTOWN\Studies\Traffic\2100301ts01.docx In 2013 SB 743 was passed by legislation and signed into law by the Governor of California, with the intent to change the evaluation of traffic impacts related to CEQA from Level of Service (LOS) to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). Under CEQA, agencies have the discretion to adopt policies and thresholds based on a wide range of options and evaluation criteria. Caltrans and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research recommends that projects exceeding a level of 15 percent below the existing VMT per capita may be considered to have less than significant impacts.

For the purpose of this study, it was assumed the City of Bakersfield will adopt this same recommendation for VMT. Based on the original traffic evaluation, the KernCOG model showed an average regional VMT per trip of 9.76 miles for households, and an estimated VMT per trip of 4.89 for the project, 49% less than the average. Since the project will have similar trip data, travel patterns and trip destinations it is assumed that the VMT impacts under CEQA will still be less than significant, therefore no additional analysis is required.

Along with the above mentioned tables, attached is a copy of the proposed Zone Change exhibit map with the project area shown, the original traffic evaluation prepared by Ruettgers and Schuler, and the proposed site plan. Please contact us should you have any questions regarding this request for exemption.

Sincerely,
McIntosh & Associates
Blaine Neptune
RCE 55102
Sincerely,
McIntosh & Associates
Blaine Neptune
RCE 55102
MJT:mjt
Sincerely,
McIntosh & Associates
Blaine Neptune
RCE 55102
MJT:mjt
Sincerely,
Blaine Neptune
12/14/2021
Project Traffic Mc#21003.01
The traffic volumes generated from the proposed project were estimated using the "Institute of Transportation Engineers" Trip Generation Manual, 11th ed.  2023.

Project Traffic – PM Peak Hour
Table 1: Proposed Project Traffic - P.M. Peak Hour Trip Ends Land Use Acres Density
D.U.'s / AC
D.U.'s ITE
Code
Rate Peak Hour
Trips-PM
Split In Split Out
Multi-Family Residential (HMR) 11.22 17.00 191 220 Note 1 103 65 38 TOTAL 103 65 38
Note 1: Used Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.43(X) + 0.20.55 to determine trip generation.

Project Traffic – Daily Traffic (A.A.D.T.)
Table 2: Proposed Project Traffic – Daily Traffic Trip Ends (A.A.D.T.) Land Use Acres Density
D.U.'s / AC
D.U.'s /
GLFA
ITE
Code
Rate Daily Trip EndsAADTSplit In Split Out
Multi-Family Residential (HMR) 11.22 17.00 191 220 Note 1 1300 650 650 TOTAL 1300 650 650
Note 2: Used Fitted Curve Equation: T = 6.41(# of D.U.’s) +75.31 to determine trip generation.

Project Traffic – AM Peak Hour
Table 3: Proposed Project Traffic - A.M. Peak Hour Trip Ends Land Use Acres Density
D.U.'s / AC
D.U.'s /
GLFA
ITE
Code
Rate Peak Hour
Trips-AM
Split In Split Out
Multi-Family Residential (HMR) 11.22 17.00 191 220 Note 1 82 20 62 TOTAL 82 20 62
Note 1: Used Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.31(X) + 22.85 to determine trip generation.

VERIFICATION OF WATER SERVICE
May 15, 2025
To:

Whitney Jackson
New Gen Engineering Group Inc.
10800 Stockdale Hwy, Suite 103
Bakersfield, CA. 93311
(661) 834-4814
Re: Municipal Water Service to 9700 and 9850 Camino Media, Parcel H and I of PMW No. 17-0426, APN 390-300-29 and 30 containing 5.94 and 5.28 gross acres, located on the north side of Camino Media and east of Old River Road.

Dear Whitney,
This is not and should not be considered as a “Will Serve Letter” but only as verification that the property is located within or adjacent to the City of Bakersfield Municipal Water System Area boundary. The “Will Serve Letter” may be produced for final map requirements after the signature of the Municipal Water Service Agreement by the property owner(s) and payment of all fees.

City of Bakersfield
Water Department
____________________________
Jeff Garnett
Municipal Water Supervisor

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2025 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent - Ordinances TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Virginia Gennaro, City Attorney
DATE: December 9, 2025
SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance amending Sections 15.66.020, 15.66.060 and 15.66.080 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code
relating to Drilling for and Production of Petroleum. (FR 11/5/25) RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance.

BACKGROUND:

On November 5, 2025, City Council had first reading of several ordinances that qualified as clean-ups for purposes of making a section read better or to comply with new rules and regulations. The clean-ups included: Section 3.20.105, Sections 15.66.020, 15.66.060, 15.66.080, Chapter 15.04, 15.05, 15.07, 15.09,

15.11, 15.13, 15.15, 15.17, 15.19, 15.30, and Chapter 15.31.

On November 19, 2025, City Council had second reading of the ordinances mentioned above and adopted them all, but delayed second reading of Sections 15.66.020, 15.66.060, and 15.66.080 based on comments received from Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA). WSPA suggested certain language be added to provide clarity as it relates to mineral rights owners. The City reviewed and made small non-substantive edits in Section 15.66.080 that address the issues raised.

Therefore, another redline version of Section 15.66.080 is attached as well as clean versions of Sections

15.66.020, 15.66.060 and 15.66.080.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The adoption of the amendments to the ordinance will not impact the City General Fund.

COUNCIL GOAL:

Community Character & Quality of Life
ATTACHMENTS:

Ordinance

REDLINE
____________________________
Ordinance Amending Chapter 15.66- Drilling for and Production of Petroleum. -- Page 1 of 20 Pages --
ORDINANCE NO. __________________

ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 15.66 OF THE

BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO DRILLING

FOR AND PRODUCTION OF PETROLEUM
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows:

SECTION 1.

Chapter 15.66 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Chapter 15.66 Drilling for and Production of Petroleum:

Sections:

15.66.010 Purpose.

15.66.020 Definitions.

15.66.030 Permits.

15.66.040 Well site development standards.

15.66.050 Abandoned and idle wells.

15.66.060 Reserved.

15.66.070 Enforcement.

15.66.080 Development/Construction encroachment in petroleum areas.

15.66.010 Purpose.

It is the intent and purpose of this chapter to regulate the drilling, redrilling and recovery of oil, gas and other hydrocarbons, including injection wells, so that these activities may be conducted in a manner that: (A) protects public health, safety and welfare; (B) conforms with established codes and regulations; (C) minimizes the potential impact to property and mineral rights owners; (D) encourages drill site consolidation; and (E) protects the quality of the environment. This chapter provides local regulations for petroleum drilling and production. These operations are also subject to state and federal regulations administered by those agencies.

15.66.020 Definitions.

The terms set forth in this chapter shall have the meanings herein unless it is apparent from the context that a different meaning is intended.

REDLINE
____________________________
Ordinance Amending Chapter 15.66- Drilling for and Production of Petroleum. -- Page 2 of 20 Pages --
“Abandonment” means the permanent plugging of a well in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division of the state of California, and the removal of all equipment related to the well, including restoration of the drill site as required by these regulations.
“A.N.S.I.” means the American National Standards Institute. “A.P.I.” means the American Petroleum Institute.
“A.S.T.M.” means the American Society for Testing Materials. “Blowout” means the uncontrolled flow of gas, liquids or solids (or a mixture thereof) from a well onto the surface.
“Blowout preventor” means a mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, or other device or combination of such devices secured to the top of a well casing including valves, fittings, and control mechanisms connected therewith designed and capable of preventing a blowout.
“Building code” means the most recent edition of the building code as adopted by the city of Bakersfield.
“Cellar” means an excavation in which the wellhead is located. “Completion of drilling” on a well site is deemed to occur for the purpose of this code upon: (1) initiation of disassembly or removal of the drilling rig from any one well on the drill site; (2) thirty days after setting of a well head on any one well on the drill site; or (3) thirty days after the drilling equipment has been removed from the site. Completion has not occurred if drilling, testing, or remedial operations are resumed on that one well before the end of any thirty-day period. “Derrick” means any framework, tower or mast together with all the appurtenances to such structure placed over a well for the purpose of drilling, raising or lowering pipe, casing, tubing or other drilling, completion production or injection tools or equipment out of or into the well bore. “Desertion” means the cessation of operations at a well site where suspension of drilling operations and removal of drilling machinery has occurred where the operator cannot be located or contacted, and no activity has taken place for at least six consecutive months, or production equipment or facilities have been removed and no activity has taken place for at least two consecutive years, unless the CalGEM has granted an extension of time pursuant to their regulations.

This definition does not apply to observation wells.

REDLINE
____________________________
Ordinance Amending Chapter 15.66- Drilling for and Production of Petroleum. -- Page 3 of 20 Pages --
“Geologic Energy Management Division” or “CalGEM” means that division of the Department of Conservation of the state of California.
“Drill” or “drilling” means to bore a hole in the earth for the purpose of completing a well, exploration or testing. Drilling includes all operations through the removal of the drilling equipment from the drill site.
“Drill island” means the discrete area zoned drilling island (DI) district in accordance with Chapter 17.64 of this code.
“Drill site” means the land required to be reserved in accordance with Section

15.66.080(C) as part of a rezoning, subdivision or other development for future drilling and/or production operations.
“Dwelling” means any building or portion thereof providing living facilities for one or more persons, including permanent provisions for sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation, and includes both single-family and multiple-family residential facilities.
“Gas” means the gaseous components or vapors contained in or derived from petroleum or natural gas.
“Grade” (adjacent ground elevation) means the lowest point of elevation of the finished surface of the ground, paving or sidewalk within the area between the structure and the property line or, when the property line is more than five feet from the structure, between the structure and a line five feet from the structure. “Hazardous well” means an oil or gas well that presently poses a danger to life, health, or natural resources as determined by the CalGEM under the provisions of the Public Resources Code.
“Idle well” means a well for which production has been suspended for a minimum of five consecutive years, except any well being held for future programs, including those being retained for use under a secondary or tertiary recovery plan or for disposal, which has been approved by the CalGEM but has not been abandoned or deserted as defined in this code and by the CalGEM. This definition does not apply to observation wells.
“Lessee” means the party possessing the right(s) to drill, develop and produce oil, gas or other hydrocarbons from the subsurface of land with said right(s) being specifically conveyed by a written oil, gas, mineral or surface lease. “Lessor” means the party owning an interest in and to any oil, gas or other hydrocarbons as may be produced from a tract of land who has conveyed the right(s) to drill, develop and produce said substances to another party (lessee) by

REDLINE
____________________________
Ordinance Amending Chapter 15.66- Drilling for and Production of Petroleum. -- Page 4 of 20 Pages --
a written oil, gas, mineral or surface drilling rights lease. This party may or may not be the surface owner.
“Maintenance” or “maintain” means the upgrading, repair, cleaning, upkeep and replacement of parts of a structure and equipment. Maintenance of a structure does not alter or lessen the character, strength, or stability of the structure.
“N.F.P.A.” means the National Fire Protection Association. “Noise sensitive receptor” means and includes a land use associated with human activities which is particularly sensitive to noise. Examples of noise sensitive receptors include hospitals, libraries, schools, residential uses, and those uses deemed noise sensitive by the city council or planning commission. “Observation well” means a well bore for the purpose of observing petroleum reservoir characteristics, including, but not limited to, temperature, saturation, pressure, and fluid movement, as recognized by the CalGEM. “Operator” means a person, including corporations, partnerships and associations, whether proprietor, lessee, contractor, or agent or officer of the same, in charge of or in control of the drilling, maintenance, and operation of a well or wells as shown on the permit application.
“Petroleum” means and includes any and all hydrocarbon substances found in a natural state, including, but not limited to, crude oil, natural gas, natural gasoline, and other related substances.
“Petroleum lease” means a property right with respect to which a lessee enjoys the right to drill, develop, produce and possess petroleum resources for a determinable period. May also be referenced as a subsurface lease or mineral rights lease.
“Production operation” means and includes all oil or gas recovery activities following completion of drilling, redrilling or testing of a well. “Public assembly” refers to a building, structure or site, or portion thereof, for the gathering together or accommodation of fifty or more persons for such purposes as deliberation, education, worship, entertainment, lodging, medical care, amusement, drinking and dining, or awaiting transportation. “Redrilling” means any drilling operation, including deviation from original well bore, to recomplete the well in the same or different geologic zone, excluding sidetracking.
“Remedial” means any work on a well, other than drilling or redrilling.

Bakersfield City CouncilDecember 17, 2025

Bakersfield City Council
December 17, 2025