OCCUPANCY LICENSE AGREEMENT
This Agreement (“Agreement”) made this day of ______________, 20__, by and between San Joaquin Valley Railroad Co. (“LICENSOR”), whose address is C/O Genesee & Wyoming Railroad Services, Inc., 13901 Sutton Park Dr.
South, Suite 270, Jacksonville, FL 32224, and City of Bakersfield (“LICENSEE”), whose address is 1600 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301.
WHEREAS, LICENSEE has submitted a written request or application to LICENSOR requesting permission to occupy LICENSOR’S property located at or near the location specified in Section 1 below; and WHEREAS, LICENSOR is willing to grant to LICENSEE the limited right to occupy LICENSOR’S property for the limited purpose described herein.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these promises, the Agreement herein, and other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
Section 1. LOCATION/DESCRIPTION.
1.1 LICENSOR hereby conveys to LICENSEE a license (“Occupancy”) to operate upon, along or across LICENSOR’S property as indicated below:
A. ( ) above ground ( X ) below ground
B. ( X ) water pipeline ( ) sewer pipeline ( ) stormwater pipeline ( ) cable tv wireline ( ) fiber optic wireline
( ) communications wireline ( ) power wireline
located at or near Mile Post 111.56, LANDCO Subdivision, Latitude: 35.404713, Longitude: -119.050186, at or near BAKERSFIELD, County of KERN, State of CA. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as conferring any property right on LICENSEE.
1.2 Said Occupancy to be located and described as follows:
UNDERGROUND WATER PIPELINE - 12" CARRIER, 24" CASING including necessary appurtenances, structures and other related fixtures, equipment, marker posts or electric power (“LICENSEE’S Facilities”), placed as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. LICENSEE’S Facilities are subordinated to all matters of record.
LICENSOR reserves the right to use the area three (3) feet below ground level and to enter LICENSEE’S Facilities for construction and maintenance of LICENSOR’S property.
Section 2. USE/PURPOSE/OWNERSHIP.
2.1 LICENSEE’S Facilities shall be installed to the satisfaction and approval of LICENSOR’S Engineer and all costs of LICENSOR’S Engineer and other technicians or professional consultants as may be required from time to time shall be borne by LICENSEE.
2.2 LICENSEE hereby agrees to reimburse LICENSOR for any and all expenses LICENSOR may incur or be subjected to, or in consequence of, the planning, negotiation, installation, construction, location, changing, alteration, relocation, operation or renewal of said Facilities, within thirty (30) days after receipt of LICENSOR’S invoice for payment.
Section 3. FEE.
Said Agreement and Occupancy is granted contingent upon payment to LICENSOR of an annual fee of $900. LICENSEE shall also submit a one-time agreement processing fee of $1000, engineering review fee of $2250 and a contractor right of entry fee of $1750, which shall be covered by a separate agreement known as CONTRACTOR RIGHT OF ENTRY LICENSE AGREEMENT. LICENSOR reserves the right to adjust the annual fee on each anniversary date of this Agreement, or at such other times as conditions warrant. Billing or acceptance by LICENSOR of any annual fee shall not imply a definite term or otherwise restrict either party from canceling this Agreement as herein provided.
Form PPL-CLX-09-2020 Permit No. SJVR250331398
Section 4. TERM/TERMINATION.
This Agreement shall continue in force indefinitely from and after the date hereof, subject, however, to the right of either party to terminate this Agreement as to the Occupancy or LICENSEE’S Facilities, or any part of LICENSEE’S Facilities, at any time, upon giving the other party thirty (30) days’ notice in writing of its desire to terminate this Agreement, and indicating in said notice the extent of said facilities and facilities to which such termination shall apply. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that (i) the use of the Occupancy as set forth above in Sections 1 and 2 is materially changed, (ii) LICENSEE’S Facilities are removed, or (iii) LICENSEE defaults on a material obligation hereunder and such default is not cured within 30 days after receipt of written notice from LICENSOR describing such default (or such longer cure period as determined in LICENSOR’S sole discretion), this Agreement shall automatically terminate. When this Agreement shall be terminated as to LICENSEE’S Facilities, or as to any part thereof, LICENSEE within thirty (30) days’ after the expiration of the time stated in said termination notice, agrees at LICENSEE’S own risk and sole expense to remove LICENSEE’S Facilities from the property of LICENSOR, or such portion thereof as LICENSOR shall require removed, and to restore LICENSOR premises and property to a neat and safe condition to the satisfaction of LICENSOR’S designated Engineer or Representative, and if LICENSEE shall fail to do so within said time, LICENSOR shall have the right, but not the duty, to remove and restore the same, at the risk and expense of LICENSEE. If this Agreement shall be terminated without cause by LICENSOR pursuant to this Section 4, and LICENSEE has complied with all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, then LICENSOR shall refund to LICENSEE the unearned portion of the annual fee paid in advance (prorated on a monthly basis).
Section 5. INDEMNITY/LIABILITY.
5.1. LICENSOR, ITS PARENTS, AFFILIATES AND SUBSIDIARIES, AND THE RESPECTIVE SHAREHOLDERS, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF EACH (HEREINAFTER COLLECTIVELY THE “LICENSOR INDEMNITEES”), SHALL not be responsible for any damage to LICENSEE’S Facilities at any time while this Agreement is in effect.
5.2 (a) LICENSEE HEREBY AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, SAVE, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFEND THE LICENSOR
INDEMNITEES FROM AND AGAINST (I) INJURY TO OR DEATH OF ANY PERSON OR PERSONS WHOMSOEVER,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE AGENTS, EMPLOYEES OR CONTRACTOR(S) OF THE PARTIES
HERETO, AND (II) THE LOSS OR DAMAGE TO ANY PROPERTY WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING PROPERTY
CLAIMS, DEMANDS, SUITS, JUDGMENTS OR EXPENSES INCURRED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH,
RESULTING FROM OR ARISING OUT OF THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF LICENSEE, ITS AGENTS, EMPLOYEES
OR CONTRACTOR(S), OR RESULTING FROM, ARISING OUT OF, OR OCCURRING IN CONNECTION WITH THE
ENTRY OR PRESENCE OF LICENSEE, ITS AGENTS, EMPLOYEES OR CONTRACTOR(S) ON THE PROPERTY, OR
RESULTING FROM, ARISING OUT OF, OR OCCURRING IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OR
EXECUTION OF ANY WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR INCIDENTAL THERETO, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE USE AND OCCUPANCY OF LICENSEE’S FACILITIES BY LICENSEE, ITS PERMITTEES, INVITEES OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY. THE INDEMNITIES PROVIDED IN THIS SECTION 5 ARE SPECIFICALLY MEANT TO INCLUDE INDEMNITY OF THE LICENSOR INDEMNITEES FOR THEIR OWN
ORDINARY NEGLIGENCE, EVEN IF THE INJURY OR DAMAGE IS CAUSED ENTIRELY BY THE ORDINARY
NEGLIGENCE OF THE LICENSOR INDEMNITEES AND THERE IS NO NEGLIGENCE OR FAULT ON THE PART OF LICENSEE. LICENSEE’S INDEMNITY OBLIGATIONS IN THIS SECTION 5 SHALL NOT BE LIMITED IN ANY WAY
BY ANY LIMITATION ON THE AMOUNT OR TYPE OF DAMAGES, COMPENSATION OR BENEFITS AVAILABLE UNDER WORKERS’ OR WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION ACTS, DISABILITY ACTS OR EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ACTS.
(b) THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE USE OF LICENSOR’S PREMISES IS FOR THE SOLE
CONVENIENCE OF LICENSEE AND THAT THE LICENSOR INDEMNITEES SHALL HAVE NO DUTY TO
LICENSEE, ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE A REASONABLY SAFE
PLACE IN WHICH TO WORK, TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE OR SAFE METHODS AND EQUIPMENT FOR THEIR WORK OR TO INSPECT OR MAINTAIN LICENSEE’S FACILITIES FOR SAID SAFE METHODS AND WORK EQUIPMENT NOR TO GIVE ANY WARNINGS OR OTHER NOTICES TO LICENSEE’S EMPLOYEES OR INVITEES REGARDING SAFETY EITHER OF LICENSEE’S FACILITIES AND RELATED WORKPLACE OR LICENSOR’S
PROXIMATE RAILROAD OPERATIONS AND THAT ALL SUCH DUTIES SHALL BE ASSUMED BY LICENSEE
WHO FURTHER AGREES TO DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE LICENSOR INDEMNITEES FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS ALLEGING ANY FAILURE TO PERFORM SAID DUTIES.
Form PPL-CLX-09-2020 Permit No. SJVR250331398
(c) IN NO EVENT UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL THE LICENSOR INDEMNITEES HAVE ANY LIABILITY FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES. THE TERM “LICENSOR INDEMNITEES” AS USED IN THIS SECTION 5 SHALL INCLUDE ANY OTHER RAILROAD COMPANY THAT MAY
BE LAWFULLY OPERATING UPON AND OVER THE TRACKS, OR THE TRACKS CROSSING OR ADJACENT TO THE TRACKS, AND THE OFFICERS, AGENTS, INVITEES AND EMPLOYEES THEREOF.
Section 6. RESERVED.
Section 7. RESERVED.
Section 8. ASSIGNMENT.
Neither this Agreement nor the Occupancy herein granted may be transferred, assigned or sublet to another party not a signatory hereto without the prior written approval of LICENSOR. Upon approval by LICENSOR, LICENSEE shall satisfy any applicable transfer of rights or assignment fees in effect at that time.
This Agreement or Occupancy herein granted may not be transferred, assigned or sublet to another party not a signatory hereto without the prior written approval of LICENSOR. Said approval by LICENSOR, subject to LICENSEE’S satisfaction of applicable transfer of rights or assignment fees in effect at that time, shall not be unreasonably withheld.
Section 9. ENVIRONMENTAL/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.
LICENSOR may, at LICENSOR’S sole discretion, during the removal of LICENSEE’S Facilities in accordance with Section 9, require LICENSEE to conduct an environmental appraisal and report of the property formerly occupied by LICENSEE’S Facilities at LICENSEE’S sole cost and expense. All reports shall be prepared by a LICENSOR approved environmental consultant, to determine if LICENSOR’S property has been environmentally impacted by the Occupancy. All environmental reports, which are prepared subject to this clause, shall be immediately available to LICENSOR by LICENSEE and shall be treated as confidential information by the parties unless disclosure of such environmental reports is required by law. This clause shall survive termination of this Agreement.
Section 10. NOTIFICATION.
In the case of emergency repairs, LICENSEE shall contact LICENSOR by calling LICENSOR’s emergency number at (866) 527-3499 in order to obtain LICENSOR’S consent prior to entering LICENSOR’s property.
Section 11. RESERVED.
Section 12. ALTERATIONS/REPAIRS.
12.1 In the event LICENSEE desires to make changes in the physical or operational characteristics of the Occupancy, LICENSEE shall first obtain in writing the consent and approval of LICENSOR.
12.2 Any entry onto LICENSOR’S property by LICENSEE its employees, agents, representatives or contractors after LICENSEE’S Facilities have initially been constructed shall occur only upon obtaining LICENSOR’S consent pursuant to Section 12 herein, if required, and entering into an additional CONTRACTOR RIGHT OF ENTRY LICENSE AGREEMENT with LICENSOR prior to entry. LICENSEE agrees that any physical or operational changes that LICENSEE desires to make shall be made at LICENSEE’S sole risk, cost and expense and subject to all the terms, covenants conditions and limitation of this Agreement. Any “flagging” services determined at LICENSOR’s sole discretion to be necessary shall be at LICENSEE’S sole cost and expense.
Section 13. RESERVED.
Section 14. INSURANCE.
LICENSEE agrees to comply with the INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, attached hereto as Exhibit C and made a part hereof, and shall provide the required Certificate of Insurance to LICENSOR simultaneous to the execution of this Agreement.
Form PPL-CLX-09-2020 Permit No. SJVR250331398
Section 15. RESERVED.
Section 16. RESERVED.
Section 17. RESERVED.
Section 18. GOVERNMENTAL REQUIREMENTS.
18.1 LICENSEE shall comply with any and all laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, orders, decisions (collectively, the “Laws”), issued by any federal, state or municipal governmental body or agency established thereby (“Authority”), relating to the construction, maintenance, and use of the LICENSEE’s Facilities by LICENSEE and any the use of LICENSOR’S property.
18.2 LICENSEE, in its Occupancy as granted herein, shall not create or permit any condition on LICENSOR’S property that could present a threat to human health or to the environment. LICENSEE shall at all times be in full compliance with all Laws, present or future, set by any Authority, including but not limited to any, environmental laws concerning water quality (surface or underground), hazardous substances and hazardous waste(s).
18.3 Should any discharge, leakage, spillage, emission or pollution of any type occur or arise on LICENSOR’S Property as a result of LICENSEE’S presence, use, operation or exercise of the rights granted herein, LICENSEE shall immediately notify LICENSOR and shall, at LICENSEE’S expense, be obligated to clean all property affected thereby, whether owned or controlled by LICENSOR or any third persons, to the satisfaction of LICENSOR (insofar as the property owned or controlled by LICENSOR is concerned) and any governmental body having jurisdiction in the matter. LICENSOR may, at is option, clean the property; if LICENSOR elects to do so, LICENSEE shall pay LICENSOR the reasonable cost of such cleanup promptly upon the receipt of a bill therefor.
18.4 LICENSEE AGREES TO RELEASE, INDEMNIFY AND DEFEND THE LICENSOR INDEMNITEES FROM AND
AGAINST ALL LIABILITY, COST AND EXPENSE (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY FINES, PENALTIES,
JUDGMENTS, LITIGATION COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES) INCURRED BY THE LICENSOR INDEMNITEES AS A RESULT OF LICENSEE’S BREACH OF THIS SECTION 18 REGARDLESS OF THE NEGLIGENCE OF THE LICENSOR
INDEMNITEES, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT ANY SUCH LIABILITIES, COSTS AND EXPENSES ARE SOLELY CAUSED BY THE GROSS NEGLIGENCE OF THE LICENSOR INDEMNITEES.
Section 19. RESERVED.
Section 20. RESERVED.
Section 21. RESERVED.
Section 22. LEGAL NOTICES.
Any notice, demand, approval, consents or communication required, permitted or desired to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be served on the parties at the following respective addresses:
LICENSEE: City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Attention: Contract Management
LICENSOR: San Joaquin Valley Railroad Co.
c/o Genesee & Wyoming Railroad Services, Inc.
Real Estate Department
13901 Sutton Park Drive South, Suite 270
Jacksonville, FL 32224
Form PPL-CLX-09-2020 Permit No. SJVR250331398
Copy to:
General Counsel
Genesee & Wyoming Inc.
20 West Avenue
Darien, CT 06820
[email protected]
the attention of such other person or officer, as any party may by written notice designate. Any notice, demand or communication required, permitted or desired to be given hereunder shall be sent either (a) by hand delivery, in which case notice shall be deemed received when actually delivered, (b) by prepaid certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, in which case notice shall be deemed received three calendar days after deposit, postage prepaid in the United States Mail, or (c) by a nationally recognized overnight courier, in which case notice shall be deemed received one business day after deposit with such courier.
Section 23. SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
If required by LICENSOR, LICENSEE at its sole cost and expense, shall furnish LICENSOR with a survey drawing, showing the final exact location of said Occupancy and LICENSEE’S Facilities. The survey drawing shall indicate LICENSOR’S survey valuation station which said installation is located, and/or the position of LICENSEE’S Facilities in relation to the center line of the track and/or the centerline of the closest public street crossing said track(s). Said survey drawing to be attached to this Agreement as Exhibit B and made a part hereof.
Section 24. PRIOR AGREEMENTS.
Execution of this Agreement shall supersede and/or cancel, as of the date first above written, any and all previous agreements, if any, related to the Occupancy and use herein described, which may exist between the parties or their predecessors.
Section 25. APPLICABLE LAW.
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of CA without regard to the choice of law provisions thereof.
Section 26. INTERPRETATION/SEVERABILITY.
To the maximum extent possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Agreement shall be prohibited by, or held to be invalid under, applicable law, such provision shall be ineffective solely to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, and this shall not invalidate the remainder of such provision or any other provision of this Agreement.
Section 27. HEADINGS.
The headings of the Sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and are not intended to govern, limit or aid in the construction of any term or provision of this Agreement.
Section 28. CONSTRUCTION OF TERMS. The terms of this Agreement have been arrived at after mutual negotiation and, therefore, it is the intention of the Parties that its terms not be construed against any of the Parties by reason of the fact that it was prepared by one of the Parties.
Section 29. COUNTERPARTS.
This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall, for all purposes, be deemed an original but which together shall constitute one and the same instrument, and counterparts of this Agreement may also be exchanged electronically and any electronic facsimile of any party’s signature shall be deemed to be an original signature for all purpose.
Form PPL-CLX-09-2020 Permit No. SJVR250331398
Section 30. CONFIDENTIALITY.
The parties shall not disclose the terms of this Agreement to a third party (a) other than as required by law so long as such party required to disclose the terms of this Agreement under applicable law provides the other party with prior written notice of such requirement, or (b) as otherwise agreed in writing between the parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties may disclose the terms and conditions of the Agreement to (1) a parent, subsidiary or affiliated company; or (2) to their lawyers and consultants, including but not limited to its auditors, provided that all such parties agree to maintain the confidentiality of such information in accordance with the terms of this provision. If any party violates this paragraph, any adversely affected party may cancel this Agreement without penalty and exercise any available remedies under applicable law. (Signature Page Follows)
Form PPL-CLX-09-2020 Permit No. SJVR250331398
THIS AGREEMENT IS hereby declared to be binding upon the parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hand and seals this __________ day of _______________20__.
LICENSOR
San Joaquin Valley Railroad Co.
By: ____________________________________
Name:
Its:
LICENSEE
City of Bakersfield
By:
Name:
Its:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the Effective Date.
"CITY" “CONTRACTOR”
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD _____________________________
By:_______________________________ By:________________________________
KAREN GOH
Mayor Print Name: ___________________________________________ Title:______________________________
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
WATER DEPARTMENT
By:___________________________
KRISTINA BUDAK
Water Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
By:___________________________
MATTHEW COLLOM
Deputy City Attorney
Insurance:____________
COUNTERSIGNED:
By:___________________________
RANDY MCKEEGAN
Finance Director
Form PPL-CLX-09-2020 Permit No. SJVR250331398
EXHIBIT A
LICENSEE’S FACILITIES
Form PPL
-CLX-09-2020 Permit No. SJVR250331398
EXHIBIT B
SURVEY
Form PPL-CLX-09-2020 Permit No. SJVR250331398
EXHIBIT C
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
(a) The Licensee shall, at its own cost and expense, prior to entry onto Licensor’s Property or the commencement of any work pursuant to this Agreement, procure and thereafter maintain throughout the term of this Agreement the following types and minimum amounts of insurance:
(i) The Licensee shall maintain Public Liability or Commercial General Liability Insurance (“CGL”), including Contractual Liability Coverage and CG 24 17 “Contractual Liability – Railroads” endorsement, covering all liabilities assumed by the Licensee under this Agreement, without exception or restriction of any kind, with a combined single limit of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) for Bodily Injury and/or Property Damage Liability per occurrence, and an aggregate limit of not less than Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) per annual policy period.
Such insurance policy shall be endorsed to provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the Licensor Indemnitees and shall name the Licensor Indemnitees as Additional Insureds. An Umbrella or Excess policy may be utilized to satisfy the required limits of liability under this section but must “follow form” and afford no less coverage than the primary policy. (ii) The Licensee shall maintain Commercial Automobile Insurance for all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles with a combined single limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for Bodily Injury and/or Property Damage Liability per occurrence. Such insurance policy shall be endorsed to provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the Licensor Indemnitees and shall name the Licensor Indemnitees as Additional Insureds. (iii) The Licensee shall maintain Statutory Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability Insurance for its employees (if any) with minimum limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for Bodily Injury by Accident, Each Accident; One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for Bodily Injury by Disease, Policy Limit; One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for Bodily Injury by Disease, Each Employee. Such insurance policy shall be endorsed to provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the Licensor Indemnitees, if applicable. (iv) Prior to any construction project within 50’ of the railroad track, the Licensee shall purchase Railroad Protective Liability Insurance naming the Licensor Indemnitees as the named insureds with limits of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) each occurrence and Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) aggregate limit The policy shall be issued on a standard ISO form CG 00 35 12 03, or, if available, obtain such coverage from the Licensor. (b) The following general insurance requirements shall apply:
(i) The specified insurance policies must be affected under standard form policies underwritten by insurers licensed in the state where work is to be performed and carry a minimum Best’s rating of “A-” and size “Class VII” or better. The Licensor reserves the right to reject as inadequate any insurance coverage provided by an insurer that is rated less than the ratings specified in this section.
(ii) All coverages shall be primary and non-contributory to any insurance coverages maintained by the Licensor Indemnitees.
(iii) All insurance policies shall be endorsed to provide the Licensor with thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation, non-renewal or material changes. (iv) The Licensee shall provide the Licensor with certificates of insurance evidencing the insurance coverages, terms and conditions required prior to commencement of any activities on Form PPL-CLX-09-2020 Permit No. SJVR250331398
or about the Property. Said certificates should reference this Occupancy License Agreement by agreement date and description and shall be furnished to the Licensor at the following address, or to such other address as the Licensor may hereafter specify:
San Joaquin Valley Railroad Co.
C/O Genesee & Wyoming Railroad Services, Inc.
13901 Sutton Park Drive South, Suite 270
Jacksonville, FL 32224
(v) If any policies providing the required coverages are written on a Claims-Made basis, the following shall apply:
(1) The retroactive date shall be prior to the commencement of the work;
(2) The Licensee shall maintain such policies on a continuous basis; (3) If there is a change in insurer or policies are canceled or not renewed, the Licensee shall purchase an extended reporting period of not less than three (3) years after the contract completion date; and (4) Licensee shall arrange for adequate time for reporting of any loss under this Agreement.
(c) The Licensor may require the Licensee to purchase additional insurance if the Licensor reasonably determines that the amount of insurance then being maintained by the Licensee is insufficient in light of all relevant factors. If the Licensee is required to purchase additional insurance, the Licensor will notify the Licensee. Failure of the Licensee to comply within thirty (30) days shall be considered a default subject to termination of the Agreement.
(d) Furnishing of insurance by the Licensee shall not limit the Licensee’s liability under this Agreement but shall be additional security therefor.
(e) The above indicated insurance coverages shall be enforceable by any legitimate claimant after the termination or cancellation of this Agreement, or any amendment hereto, whether by expiration of time, by operation of law or otherwise, so long as the basis of the claim against the insurance company occurred during the period of time when the Agreement was in effect and the insurance was in force. (f) Failure to provide the required insurance coverages or endorsements (including contractual liability endorsement) or adequate reporting time shall be at Licensee’s sole risk. (g) If contractors are utilized, the Licensee agrees to require all such contractors to comply with the insurance requirements of this Exhibit C and sign a separate right of entry agreement, as required by the Agreement.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent - Agreements TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jennifer M. Byers, Economic and Community Development Director DATE: March 31, 2026
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 2025-098 with the Housing Authority of the County of Kern to include an additional funding source (HHAP-5) for Operating Reserves and Supportive Services for 48 affordable housing rental units at 3201 F Street (Ward 3) RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the amendment.
BACKGROUND:
On June 25, 2025, the City entered into Agreement No. 2025-098 with the Housing Authority of the County of Kern for Operating Reserves and Supportive Services of forty-eight (48) affordable housing rental housing units located at 3201 F Street Bakersfield CA 93301 (Elevate).
The funding for Agreement No. 2025-098 only identified federal HOME-ARP funds but should have included both federal HOME-ARP funds and state Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention Round 5 (HHAP-5) funds as a portion of the compensation. This amendment would incorporate the additional funding source (HHAP-5). No increase in compensation will be made.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact to the City General Fund, project will be funded with Federal HOME-ARP and State HHAP-5 Grants.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Safety and Resilience
ATTACHMENT:
Amendment
____________________________________________________________ AMENDMENT No. 1 to AGREEMENT No. 2025-098
AGREEMENT NO. 2025-098 (1)
AMENDMENT NO. [1] TO AGREEMENT NO. 2025-098
This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT NO. 2025-098 is made and entered into on _______________________, by and between the CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF KERN, an independent, local government agency that serves Kern County residents (“SUBRECIPIENT”). CITY and SUBRECIPIENT collectively referred to as “Parties” herein.
R E C I T A L S
WHEREAS, on June 25, 2025, CITY and SUBRECIPIENT entered into Agreement No. 2025-098 for Operating Reserves and Supportive Services of forty-eight (48) affordable housing rental housing units located at 3201 F Street Bakersfield CA 93301; and WHEREAS, the funding for Agreement No. 2025-098 only identified federal HOMEARP funds but should have included both federal HOME-ARP funds and state Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention Round 5 (HHAP-5) funds as a portion of the compensation; and
WHEREAS, HHAP-5 grant funds have an expenditure deadline of June 2028; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to Amend Agreement 2025-098 to include the additional funding source and to reflect the new end date of the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the foregoing recitals herein, CITY and SUBRECIPIENT mutually agree as follows:
1. Section 2 of Agreement No. 2025-098 entitled “Compensation” is hereby amended to read as follows:
2. COMPENSATION. Subject to the conditions of this section, it is expressly agreed and understood that the total grant amounts to be paid by CITY under this Agreement shall NOT EXCEED ONE MILLION FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,400,000) grant funds to be paid as follows:
2.1 Reimbursement Payments for Supportive Services: Supportive Services payments shall not exceed THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($300,000) of HOME-ARP funds. CITY agrees to reimburse “claims for payment” directly to SUBRECIPIENT within thirty (30) days after CITY receives a satisfactory “claim for payment.” SUBRECIPIENT shall properly itemize and document claims for payment to show clearly the items, tasks, or services for which SUBRECIPIENT claims reimbursement, as well as describing to which of the activities the payment is related.
SUBRECIPIENT shall also describe the basis for computation: cost per hour, cost per weight, cost per task, or other measurement as CITY may specify. CITY may review the claim for completeness and accuracy and may refuse to pay any claim until explained to CITY’S satisfaction.
Docusign Envelope ID: 06AB3C9A-1F28-498D-9CDB-9D33BFC09261 ____________________________________________________________ AMENDMENT No. 1 to AGREEMENT No. 2025-098
2.2 Lump Sum Payment for Operating Reserve. Upon execution of the Agreement, SUBRECIPIENT will receive a one-time payment not to exceed ONE MILLION ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
($1,100,000) in HHAP-5 grant funds to establish a capitalized project operating cost assistance reserve.
2.3 Additional Funding. SUBRECIPIENT must disclose the receipt of any new or additional HOME-ARP Supportive Services, Operating Cost, or Capacity Building assistance from other participating jurisdiction(s).
2. Except as amended herein, all provisions of Agreement No. 2025-098 shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 2025-098 to be executed the day and year first above written. "CITY" “CONTRACTOR”
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD HOUSING AUTHORITY OF
THE COUNTY OF KERN
By: ________________________________ By: ________________________________ KAREN GOH STEPHEN M. PELZ
Mayor Executive Director
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
By:_______________________________
JENNIFER M. BYERS
Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM: COUNTERSIGNED:
City Attorney: ___________________________ Finance Director: ___________________________
VIRGINIA GENNARO RANDY MCKEEGAN
Insurance:____________
Docusign Envelope ID: 06AB3C9A-1F28-498D-9CDB-9D33BFC09261 Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: 06AB3C9A-1F28-498D-9CDB-9D33BFC09261 Status: Completed Subject: Complete with Docusign: Amendment to Agreement 2025-098(1).pdf Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 2 Signatures: 2 Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 5 Initials: 0 City Clerk's Office
AutoNav: Enabled
EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
[email protected]
IP Address: 174.46.226.5
Record Tracking
Status: Original
3/27/2026 2:08:00 PM
Holder: City Clerk's Office
[email protected]
Location: DocuSign
Security Appliance Status: Connected Pool: StateLocal
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Stephen M. Pelz
[email protected]
Executive Director
Housing Authority of the County of Kern
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Uploaded Signature Image
Using IP Address: 67.53.104.11
Sent: 3/27/2026 2:09:49 PM
Viewed: 3/30/2026 8:40:05 AM
Signed: 3/30/2026 8:40:37 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 3/30/2026 8:40:05 AM
ID: 5c1697d4-47a9-442b-9ef5-0027e90640bc
Jennifer M. Byers
[email protected]
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 174.46.226.5
Sent: 3/30/2026 8:40:38 AM
Viewed: 3/30/2026 8:42:54 AM
Signed: 3/30/2026 8:43:10 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 5/26/2023 10:13:24 AM
ID: ab9ab9e6-74d8-43a0-b6e5-e1f3271042ea
In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Witness Events Signature Timestamp
Notary Events Signature Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 3/27/2026 2:09:49 PM
Certified Delivered Security Checked 3/30/2026 8:42:54 AM Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Signing Complete Security Checked 3/30/2026 8:43:10 AM
Completed Security Checked 3/30/2026 8:43:10 AM
Payment Events Status Timestamps
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure
ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE DISCLOSURE
From time to time, City of Bakersfield (we, us or Company) may be required by law to provide to you certain written notices or disclosures. Described below are the terms and conditions for providing to you such notices and disclosures electronically through the DocuSign system.
Please read the information below carefully and thoroughly, and if you can access this information electronically to your satisfaction and agree to this Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure (ERSD), please confirm your agreement by selecting the check-box next to ‘I agree to use electronic records and signatures’ before clicking ‘CONTINUE’ within the DocuSign system.
Getting paper copies
At any time, you may request from us a paper copy of any record provided or made available electronically to you by us. You will have the ability to download and print documents we send to you through the DocuSign system during and immediately after the signing session and, if you elect to create a DocuSign account, you may access the documents for a limited period of time (usually 30 days) after such documents are first sent to you. After such time, if you wish for us to send you paper copies of any such documents from our office to you, you will be charged a $0.00 per-page fee. You may request delivery of such paper copies from us by following the procedure described below.
Withdrawing your consent
If you decide to receive notices and disclosures from us electronically, you may at any time change your mind and tell us that thereafter you want to receive required notices and disclosures only in paper format. How you must inform us of your decision to receive future notices and disclosure in paper format and withdraw your consent to receive notices and disclosures electronically is described below.
Consequences of changing your mind
If you elect to receive required notices and disclosures only in paper format, it will slow the speed at which we can complete certain steps in transactions with you and delivering services to you because we will need first to send the required notices or disclosures to you in paper format, and then wait until we receive back from you your acknowledgment of your receipt of such paper notices or disclosures. Further, you will no longer be able to use the DocuSign system to receive required notices and consents electronically from us or to sign electronically documents from us.
All notices and disclosures will be sent to you electronically Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure created on: 6/28/2022 10:51:05 AM Parties agreed to: Stephen M. Pelz, Jennifer M. Byers
Unless you tell us otherwise in accordance with the procedures described herein, we will provide electronically to you through the DocuSign system all required notices, disclosures, authorizations, acknowledgements, and other documents that are required to be provided or made available to you during the course of our relationship with you. To reduce the chance of you inadvertently not receiving any notice or disclosure, we prefer to provide all of the required notices and disclosures to you by the same method and to the same address that you have given us. Thus, you can receive all the disclosures and notices electronically or in paper format through the paper mail delivery system. If you do not agree with this process, please let us know as described below. Please also see the paragraph immediately above that describes the consequences of your electing not to receive delivery of the notices and disclosures electronically from us.
How to contact City of Bakersfield:
You may contact us to let us know of your changes as to how we may contact you electronically, to request paper copies of certain information from us, and to withdraw your prior consent to receive notices and disclosures electronically as follows:
To contact us by email send messages to: [email protected] To advise City of Bakersfield of your new email address To let us know of a change in your email address where we should send notices and disclosures electronically to you, you must send an email message to us at [email protected] and in the body of such request you must state: your previous email address, your new email address. We do not require any other information from you to change your email address.
If you created a DocuSign account, you may update it with your new email address through your account preferences.
To request paper copies from City of Bakersfield
To request delivery from us of paper copies of the notices and disclosures previously provided by us to you electronically, you must send us an email to [email protected] and in the body of such request you must state your email address, full name, mailing address, and telephone number. We will bill you for any fees at that time, if any.
To withdraw your consent with City of Bakersfield
To inform us that you no longer wish to receive future notices and disclosures in electronic format you may:
i. decline to sign a document from within your signing session, and on the subsequent page, select the check-box indicating you wish to withdraw your consent, or you may; ii. send us an email to [email protected] and in the body of such request you must state your email, full name, mailing address, and telephone number. We do not need any other information from you to withdraw consent.. The consequences of your withdrawing consent for online documents will be that transactions may take a longer time to process..
Required hardware and software
The minimum system requirements for using the DocuSign system may change over time. The current system requirements are found here: https://support.docusign.com/guides/signer-guidesigning-system-requirements.
Acknowledging your access and consent to receive and sign documents electronically To confirm to us that you can access this information electronically, which will be similar to other electronic notices and disclosures that we will provide to you, please confirm that you have read this ERSD, and (i) that you are able to print on paper or electronically save this ERSD for your future reference and access; or (ii) that you are able to email this ERSD to an email address where you will be able to print on paper or save it for your future reference and access. Further, if you consent to receiving notices and disclosures exclusively in electronic format as described herein, then select the check-box next to ‘I agree to use electronic records and signatures’ before clicking ‘CONTINUE’ within the DocuSign system.
By selecting the check-box next to ‘I agree to use electronic records and signatures’, you confirm that:
You can access and read this Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure; and You can print on paper this Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure, or save or send this Electronic Record and Disclosure to a location where you can print it, for future reference and access; and
Until or unless you notify City of Bakersfield as described above, you consent to receive exclusively through electronic means all notices, disclosures, authorizations, acknowledgements, and other documents that are required to be provided or made available to you by City of Bakersfield during the course of your relationship with City of Bakersfield.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent - Agreement TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kristina Budak, Water Director
DATE: April 7, 2026
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2024-102 with Wastewater Solids Management Inc (extend the term by one year and increase compensation by $25,000; revised not to exceed $175,000) to provide digester cleaning services for the Wastewater Division of the Water Department.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of amendment.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Bakersfield Wastewater Division conducts preventative maintenance for its anaerobic digesters. This work is necessary to ensure efficient operation and to remove accumulated debris that may contribute to equipment damage, operational disruptions, or reduce performance.
The City Council approved Agreement No. 2024-102 with Wastewater Solids Management Inc. on April 24, 2024, for $150,000. Wastewater Solids Management Inc. was selected after responding to the City’s Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for digester cleaning services. Agreement No. 2024-102 provided for renewal of the Agreement for up to three consecutive one-year periods upon mutually agreeable terms.
On April 23, 2025, Amendment No. 1 extended the term by one year with no additional compensation added.
At this time, based on the anticipated maintenance, staff recommends exercising the option to extend the contract for one year through April 30, 2027, and increase the compensation by $25,000 for a revised total amount not to exceed $175,000.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Sufficient funds are budgeted within the Sewer Enterprise Fund to fund this amendment. There is no General Fund Impact associated with this amendment.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Reliable Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Amendment No. 2
2. Exhibit B
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
S:\Engineering\Annual Contract & Request For Proposal\RFQP Digester Cleaning\2024\Amendment 2 - Wastewater Solids Management\Agrmnt 2024-102(2) - Wastewater Solids Management Inc - MSC Edits.doc Updated – August 2025
-- Page 1 of 3 Pages --
AGREEMENT NO. __________________
AMENDMENT NO. [2] TO
AGREEMENT NO. 2024-102
This AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT NO. 2024-102 is made and entered into on ________________, by and between the CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, a municipal corporation (referred to herein as “CITY”), and WASTEWATER SOLIDS MANAGEMENT, INC., a Corporation authorized to do business in California (referred to herein as “CONTRACTOR”).
R E C I T A L S
WHEREAS, City and CONTRACTOR entered into Agreement No. 2024-102 on April 24, 2024, to provide Digester Cleaning Services for the Wastewater Division; and
WHEREAS, on April 23, 2025 CITY and CONTRACTOR entered into Amendment No. 1 to Agreement 2024-102 to extend the term by one (1) year, to April 30, 2026, in accordance with the original terms of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend Agreement No. 2024-102 to increase funds by TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($25,000) for a total compensation of ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($175,000) and extend the Term of this Agreement by one (1) year in accordance with the original terms of the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the foregoing recitals herein, CITY and CONTRACTOR mutually agree as follows:
1. Section 2 of Agreement No. 2024-102 entitled
“COMPENSATION/PAYMENT PROCEDURE” is hereby amended to
read as follows:
2. COMPENSATION/PAYMENT PROCEDURE. Subject to the
conditions of this section, CITY will pay CONTRACTOR as follows for performing the Scope of Work (“Compensation”): CITY will pay CONTRACTOR a fixed fee based upon the percentage of the Scope of Work completed as described in the submitted proposal, and at the rates specified in the updated rate sheet dated April 1,
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
S:\Engineering\Annual Contract & Request For Proposal\RFQP Digester Cleaning\2024\Amendment 2 - Wastewater Solids Management\Agrmnt 2024-102(2) - Wastewater Solids Management Inc - MSC Edits.doc Updated – August 2025
-- Page 2 of 3 Pages --
2026, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated by reference herein.
CITY will pay CONTRACTOR within 30 days after CONTRACTOR submits an itemized invoice for the portions of the Scope of Work completed and that invoice is approved by CITY. The
Compensation will be the total amount paid to CONTRACTOR for performing the Scope of Work and includes, but is not limited to, all out- of- pocket costs and taxes. CITY will pay no other compensation to CONTRACTOR. In no case will CITY compensate CONTRACTOR more than ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND
DOLLARS ($175,000) for performing the Scope of Work.
2. Section 3 of Agreement No. 2024-102 entitled “Term” is hereby amended to read as follows:
3. TERM. Unless terminated sooner, as set forth herein, this Agreement shall terminate on April 30, 2027. The contract is renewable annually for one (1) consecutive one-year period at the CITY’S option and upon mutually agreeable terms.
3. Except as amended herein, all provisions of Agreement No. 2024- 102 shall remain in full force and effect.
-- o0o –
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
S:\Engineering\Annual Contract & Request For Proposal\RFQP Digester Cleaning\2024\Amendment 2 - Wastewater Solids Management\Agrmnt 2024-102(2) - Wastewater Solids Management Inc - MSC Edits.doc Updated – August 2025
-- Page 3 of 3 Pages --
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2024-102 to be executed the day and year first above written.
“CITY” “CONTRACTOR”
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD WASTEWATER SOLIDS MANAGEMENT, INC.
By: ____________________________ By: ________________________________
KAREN GOH
Mayor Print Name: ________________________
Title: _______________________________
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
WATER DEPARTMENT
By: ____________________________
KRISTINA BUDAK
Water Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM: COUNTERSIGNED:
(Deputy) City Attorney: _______________________ Finance Director: _____________________
MATTHEW COLLOM RANDY MCKEEGAN
Insurance: ____________
Victoria E Prince
General Manager/Corporate Secretary
A DMINISTRATIVE OFFICE ACCOUNTING OFFICE CORPORATE OFFICE P.O. BOX 430 P.O. BOX 13 87 P.O. BOX 1387
YACHATS, OR 97498 LINCOLN, CA 95648 LINCOLN , CA 95648
(541) 547 - 3213 PHONE/FAX
Proposed Fee Schedule
Item 2024
Proposal Fee
2025
Proposal Fee
incl. 2.5% COLA
2026
Proposal Fee
incl. 2.8% COLA
Digester 3 & 4, Plant 2: 90’ Diameter, estimated 1.43 MG of material in situ $41,690.00 $42,732.25 $43,928.75 Digester 3-6, Plant 3: 70’ Diameter, estimated 0.75 MG of material in situ $31,960.00 $32,759.00 $33,676.25 Digester 7 & 8, Plant 3: 90’ Diameter, estimated 1.2 MG of material in situ $38,690.00 $39,657.25 $40,767.65 Projected Total, Plant 2 (2 – 90’D with separate mobilizations) $83,380.00 $85,464.50 $87,857.50 Projected Total, Plant 3 (4 – 70’D; 2 – 90’D with separate mobilizations) $205,220.00 $210,350.30 $216,240.30 Project Total $288,600.00 $295,815.00 $304,097.80
April 1, 2026
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent - Agreements TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Randy McKeegan, Finance Director
DATE: April 7, 2026
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2024-113 with Ferguson Enterprises LLC (to accept a three percent (3%) contract price increase, revised not to exceed $397,428.93) for fire hydrants and fire hydrant parts.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the amendment.
BACKGROUND:
On May 8, 2024, the City Council approved the annual contract for the supply of fire hydrants and hydrant parts with Ferguson Enterprises LLC in the amount of $397,428.93; renewable annually thereafter for four consecutive one-year periods. The City may exercise the option to allow price adjustments due to increases in the Producer Price Index (PPI)
Fire hydrants within the City limits are maintained by the Water Resources Department. The Water Resources staff maintains a stock of fire hydrants parts for repair or replacement for operational failure as well as damage from vehicle accidents.
Ferguson Enterprises LLC has requested a three percent (3%) price increase. After review, staff have approved the request, as the increase is permissible due to increases in the Producer Price Index (PPI) and is in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the original bid specifications.
Per the terms of the contract, amendments increasing the contract and/or extending the contract have been approved as follows:
• Amendment 1 approved April 23, 2025; extend term by one year.
Currently, there is $341,885 remaining on the contract. If approved, Amendment No. 2 will increase the contract price by 3%. No additional funds are needed at this time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are budgeted in the Water Resources operating account.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Reliable Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Signed Amendment No.2 to Agreement No. 2024-113
2. EXHIBIT A
Annual Contract for Fire Hydrants
& Hydrant Parts
Bid No. 23-24-65
LINE PRODUCT DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT
PRICE 3% increase
UNIT
PRICE
EFFECTIVE
4/22/26
1 Clow 850 stem sleeve, 4” outlet #F1630010, No Subsitution 50 169.00 5.07 174.07 2 Clow 850 outlet, 2-1/2” outlet #F16300009, No Subsitution 25 154.00 4.62 158.62 3 Clow 850 carrier, 2-1/2” outlet #F1630748, No Subsitution 50 109.00 3.27 112.27 4 Clow 850 carrier, 4” outlet #F1630003, No Subsitution 50 160.00 4.80 164.80 5 Clow 850 retainer, 2-1/2” outlet #F1630844, No Subsitution 50 14.00 0.42 14.42 6 Clow 850 valve rubber, 2-1/2” outlet #T1630012, No Subsitution 1000 16.00 0.48 16.48 7 Clow 850 washer, 2-1/2” outlet #T1630275, No Subsitution 100 4.00 0.12 4.12 8 Clow 850 slotted nut, 4” outlet #F1630076, No Subsitution 50 21.00 0.63 21.63 9 Clow 850 O-Ring (outlet), 4” outlet #T1630276, No Subsitution 1200 13.00 0.39 13.39 10 Clow 850 O-Ring (carrier), 2-1/2” outlet #T1630684, No Subsitution 1200 6.00 0.18 6.18 11 Clow 850 O-Ring (stem), 4” outlet #T1630269, No Subsitution 1200 6.00 0.18 6.18 12 Clow 850 O-Ring (stem sleeve), 4” outlet #T1630278, No Subsitution 1500 3.00 0.09 3.09 13 Clow 850 Pro Cap, 2-1/2” outlet #11-420 –or- #12-430 500 77.00 2.31 79.31 14 Clow 850 Pro Cap, 4” outlet #11-421 –or- #12-431 250 124.00 3.72 127.72 15 Jones 4048 nozzle insert, 2-1/2” outlet #34-0113 50 72.27 2.17 74.44 16 Jones 4048 nozzle insert, 4” outlet #34-0115 50 136.09 4.08 140.17 17 Jones 4048 O-Ring, 2-1/2” outlet #15-0192 750 0.43 0.01 0.44 18 Jones 4048 O-Ring, 4” outlet #194572 750 6.79 0.20 6.99 19 Jones 4048 O-Ring (nozzle), 2-1/2” outlet #15-0242 750 0.79 0.02 0.81 20 Jones 4048 O-Ring (nozzle), 4” outlet #15-0243 750 2.27 0.07 2.34 21 Jones 4048 Stem, 2-1/2” outlet #26-0089 50 68.81 2.06 70.87 22 Jones 4048 Stem, 4” outlet #26-0091 50 80.16 2.40 82.56 23 Jones 4048 Insert, 2-1/2” outlet #34-0688 50 112.62 3.38 116.00 24 Jones 4048 Insert, 4” outlet #34-0689 50 95.97 2.88 98.85 25 Jones 4048 Assy. Holder & disc, 2-1/2” outlet #27-0500 50 64.66 1.94 66.60 26 Jones 4048 Assy. Holder & disc, 4” outlet #27-0501 50 117.40 3.52 120.92 27 Jones 4048 Locknut – stem, 2-1/2” outlet #16-0016 250 12.33 0.37 12.70 28 Jones 4048 Nut – stem, 2-1/2” outlet #16-0254 300 13.54 0.41 13.95 29 Jones 4048 Set Screw, 2-1/2” outlet #20-0025 50 0.44 0.01 0.45 30 Jones 4048 Cap, 2-1/2” outlet #23-0168 100 90.53 2.72 93.25 31 Jones 4048 Cap, 4” outlet #23-0184 100 117.32 3.52 120.84 32 Jones 4048 Dome cap, #23-0166 100 39.04 1.17 40.21
33 Jones 4048 S-Hook, #30-0021 500 1.20 0.04 1.24
34 Jones 4048 Chain #30-0003 500 18.72 0.56 19.28
35 Jones 4048 Full Hydrant Assy., 6” wet barrel 2.5”x4” 50 2,104.55 63.14 2,167.69 36 Extension (spool), 6” 15 133.19 4.00 137.19
37 Extension (spool), 8” 10 137.56 4.13 141.69
38 Extension (spool), 10” 2 155.03 4.65 159.68
39 Extension (spool), 12” 12 156.49 4.69 161.18
40 Extension (spool), 14” 2 179.05 5.37 184.42
41 Extension (spool), 16” 2 195.09 5.85 200.94
42 Extension (spool), 18” 4 200.89 6.03 206.92
43 Extension (spool), 24” 2 235.09 7.05 242.14
44 Extension (spool), 36” 6 326.08 9.78 335.86
45 Gasket – 6” – 1/8” FF CIR 6h 150# (FULL-FACE) 100 3.52 0.11 3.63 46 Dummy Nut -1-3/4” 1000 15.67 0.47 16.14
47 6" 6-Hole Solid Bolt Set - 5/8" x 3" - A307 GR-A Zinc 100 6.62 0.20 6.82 48 6" 6-Hole Break-Off Bolt Set - 5/8" x 3" - A307 GR-A Zinc 100 8.64 0.26 8.90 Ferguson Enterprises
Bakersfield, CA
EXHIBIT A
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent - Agreement TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kristina Budak, Water Director
DATE: April 7, 2026
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 2023-024 with AECOM Technical Services, Inc (extend the term by eight months and increase compensation by $47,300; revised not to exceed $238,300) to provide design and engineering services for Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 3 Booster Blower Upgrade.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend approval of amendment.
BACKGROUND:
Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 3 has three gas blowers that are responsible for boosting digester gas pressure to 10 psi prior to conveyance to the gas treatment facilities. The proper operation of the booster blowers ensures that gas from digesters is collected, treated, and used by the internal combustion cogenerations engines or properly disposed of via the flare.
On January 25, 2023, City entered into Agreement No. 2023-024 with AECOM Technical Services (AECOM) to provide design and engineering services for the Booster Blower Upgrade project. AECOM was selected from City’s On-Call Library of Professional Firms and approved by staff after their proposal was found to be acceptable.
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 2023-024 was approved on February 28, 2024, adding $19,000 in compensation to cover expanded scope, including design details for replacing pressure relief valves, sediment traps, flame arrestors, and back-pressure relief valves for digesters 3 through 6, along with additional bidding and construction phase support.
Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2023-024 was approved on May 28, 2025, extending the term by 18 months and adding $20,000 in compensation to address a higher-than-expected volume of requests for information submissions that exceeded the available project budget.
The proposed Amendment No. 3 would add $47,300 to cover additional change orders and the City's request for record drawings based on field markups, bringing total compensation to $238,300 and extending the term through August 31, 2027.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Sufficient funds are budgeted in the Sewer Enterprise Fund capital improvement program for this amendment, therefore, there is no impact to the City General Fund associated with this amendment.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Reliable Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Amendment No. 3
2. Exhibit A
3. Exhibit B
4. Exhibit C
5. Exhibit D
6. Exhibit E
AGREEMENT NO. _
AMENDMENT NO. [3] TO
AGREEMENT NO. 2023-024
This AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT NO. 2023-024 is made and entered into on , by and between the CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, a municipal corporation (referred to herein as "CITY"), and AECOM TECHNCIAL SERVICES, INC. a Corporation authorized to do business in California (referred to herein as "CONTRACTOR").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on January 25, 2023, CITY and DESIGN CONSULTANT entered into Agreement No. 2023-024 to develop the Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 3 Booster Blower Replacement Project (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, on February 28, 2024 CITY and DESIGN CONSULTANT entered into Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 2023-024 to increase compensation by NINETEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($19,000) for a total compensation of ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY-ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($171,000): and
WHEREAS, on May 28, 2025 CITY and DESIGN CONSULTANT entered into Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2023-024 to increase compensation by TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($20,000) for a total compensation of ONE HUNDRED NINETY-ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($191,000) and extend the term by eighteen ( 18) months to December 31, 2026, in accordance with the original terms of the agreement; and
WHEREAS, the DESIGN CONSULTANT has submitted additional work that is essential for the completion of the Project, as detailed in Exhibit E attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into Amendment No. 3 to Agreement 2023-024 to increase compensation by FORTY-SEVEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($47,300) and extend the term by eight (8) months in accordance with the original terms of the agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the foregoing recitals herein, CITY and DESIGN CONSULTANT mutually agree as follows:
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
S:\Projects\E3K305 WWTP 3 Booster Blower Update\100-Administration\1 10-Contracts\1 12-Design Phase\4-Council Documents\Amendment\Amendment 3- AECOM Booster\2023-024 (3)- AECOM Booster Blower Project - MSC Edits.doc Updated - August 2025
-- Page 1 of 3 Pages --
1. Section 1 of Agreement No. 2023-024 entitled "SCOPE OF WORK" is hereby amended to read as follows:
1. SCOPE OF WORK. In exchange for the Compensation
(defined below), DESIGN CONSULTANT must competently and thoroughly design and engineer the Project as more specifically described in the Proposal, and in DESIGN CONSULTANT's scope of work, attached hereto as Exhibit A, Exhibit C, Exhibit D, and Exhibit E incorporated herein by reference (collectively, the project description in the Request and DESIGN CONSULTANT'S scope of work are referred to as "Scope of Work"). DESIGN CONSULTANT'S services shall include all the procedures necessary to properly complete the Scope of Work, whether specifically included in the Scope of Work or not.
2. Section 2 of Agreement No. 2023-024 entitled
"COMPENSATION/PAYMENT PROCEDURE" is hereby amended to
read as follows:
2. COMPENSATION/PAYMENT PROCEDURE. In exchange for
performing the Scope of Work and subject to the terms of this section, CITY will pay DESIGN CONSULTANT as follows
("Compensation"):
CITY will reimburse DESIGN CONSULTANT'S actual costs (including labor costs, employee benefits, overhead, and other direct costs) in an amount not to exceed TWO HUNDRED THIRTY-EIGHT THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($238,300) exclusive of any fixed fee.
Actual costs shall not exceed the estimated wage rates and other costs set forth in DESIGN CONSULTANT's Uniform Rate Schedule established by Resolution No. 157-2022 attached as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference.
CITY will pay DESIGN CONSULTANT within 30 days after DESIGN CONSULTANT submits an itemized invoice for the portions of the Scope of Work completed and that invoice is approved by CITY.
The Compensation will be the total amount paid to DESIGN CONSULTANT for performing the Scope of Work and includes, but is not limited to, all out-of-pocket costs and taxes. CITY will pay no other compensation to DESIGN CONSULTANT. In no case will CITY compensate DESIGN CONSULTANT more than TWO HUNDRED
THIRTY-EIGHT THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($238,300) for performing the Scope of Work.
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
S:\Projects\E3K305 WWTP 3 Booster Blower Update\100-Administration\1 10-Contracts\1 12-Design Phase\4-Council Documents\Amendment\Amendment 3- AECOM Booster\2023-024 (3)- AECOM Booster Blower Project - MSC Edits.doc Updated - August 2025
-- Page 2 of 3 Pages --
3. Section 3 of Agreement No. 2023-024 entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as follows:
3. TERM. Unless terminated sooner as set forth herein, this Agreement shall terminate August 31, 2027.
4. Except as amended herein, all provisions of Agreement No. 2023- 024 shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 2023-024 to be executed the day and year first above written.
"CITY"
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
By: _
KAREN GOH
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
WATER DEPARTMENT
By:----------
KRISTINA BUDAK
Water Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
(Deputy) City ttrney.
MATTHEW COLLOM
Insurance: _
"CONTRACTOR"
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
Print Name; pAt Covar
Title: DEPA#TUT AUAGse
COUNTERSIGNED:
Finance Director.
RANDY MCKEEGAN
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
S:\Projects\E3K305 INWTP 3 Booster Blower Update\100-Administration\110-Contracts\112-Design Phase\4-Council Documents\Amendment\Amendment 3- AECOM Booster\2023-024 (3) - AECOM Booster Blower Project - MSC Edits.doc Updated August 2025
-- Page 3 of 3 Pages --
AECOM (661) 283-2323 tel
5001 E. Commercenter Dr., Suite 100
Bakersfield, CA 93309
January 17, 2023
Evette Roldan, PE
City of Bakersfield
6901 McCutchen Road
Bakersfield, CA 93313
Subject: Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 3 Blower Replacement Dear Evette,
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (AECOM) is pleased to submit this proposal for replacement of the City of Bakersfield (City) Wastewater Treatment No. 3 Blower system.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The Blowers at City of Bakersfield Wastewater Treatment 3 receive digester gas from the six active digesters, compress the gas and send it to the gas treatment area to the south and immediately east of the Cogeneration facility. The blowers should operate when gas pressure from the digesters is above a set range. Below that range, the blowers should shut off. (Alternately if the blowers operated with VFD’s they could operate for longer run times and deliver gas in a smoother manner to the gas treatment facility). At the treatment facility, H2S and Siloxane are removed, and the gas is stored in a large buffer vessel from which the gas is conveyed to the co-generators. If the pressure measured in the buffer vessel increases above a given set point, then gas is sent to the flare and continues until a given lower set pressure is reached.
The blowers are a critical element. For that reason, there are three which consist of one primary and two alternates. At no time should there be any less than one alternate blower that is operational.
The three blowers have reached the end of their reliable service life and need to be replaced. To extend future service life, this project will consist of replacing all three blowers with new ones and include a new cooling system, a canopy and new power and control for the blowers. At your preference the canopy may also have lighting for security and for working on the equipment (two levels of lighting).
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1 – Design Phase
1.1 Attend project kick-off meeting and visit project site. We will cover scope, schedule, and deliverables. To save time and effort, at the Kickoff meeting, we will also present our preliminary work which will consist of calculations to size the blowers based on full plant capacity of 32 MGD.
We will also look at various blower and glycol cooler manufacturers and discuss options with the City.
It is the goal of this discussion to receive direction from the City on selection of the major equipment.
AECOM 2
1.2 Background Plan and Control Narrative: The control system that operates the blowers will be inspected by our instrumentation designer, to determine which are in satisfactory working condition and which need to be replaced. Those components are at the blower site, and some are also at the gas treatment site. We will verify how the system currently operates and make recommendations on adjustments that should be made at that time for better operation. We will also describe how the new system will be controlled. The control narrative will describe how the gas flow will be controlled, how the compressors will operate (lead-lag and alternating starts), VFD option if viable, and the signals that will go to SCADA. SCADA integration is not assumed to be in our scope and should be provided by the City’s SCADA integrator. These recommendations will be accompanied with a plan view identifying locations of each primary component.
Deliverable: Memo style. A concept plan and process/control narrative that recommends adjustments to the current system control if possible and how the replacement system will operate.
1.3 Plans, Specifications, and Opinion of Probable Construction Cost will be prepared at the 90% and 100% levels. The plans will be developed in AutoCAD (2D).
Deliverables:
• Three (3) hardcopies and electronic (PDF) copy of 90% Construction Plans, Technical Specifications, and Opinion of Probable Cost
• Three (3) hardcopies and electronic (PDF) copy of 100% Construction Plans, Technical Specifications, and Opinion of Probable Cost
Assumptions:
• Preparation of environmental documentation and/or permitting of any kind is not included. • Plans will be developed based on the Record Drawings dated 2007. Dimensions will not be independently verified or topographically surveyed. Dimensions will be tape measured in the field by our design staff as needed for layout. • SCADA integration is assumed to be completed by the City. • Wiring and conduits between the blower/cooler skids and motor control center will be replaced, and the existing motor control center will also be replaced if needed. • The geotechnical investigation and recommendations report for the 2007 project at Wastewater Treatment Plant 3 2007 Expansion will be made available to AECOM. If additional testing is needed, it will be provided by the City.
Task 2 – Bidding Phase
2.1 AECOM will attend and participate in the pre-bid conference. We will assist the City in preparing an agenda and take notes during the meeting. Following the meeting, AECOM will provide a memorandum to the City.
2.2 Design team personnel will be available to answer RFI’s for the duration of the project bid period (Up to 5 assumed).
2.3 AECOM personnel will be available to aid in the preparation of addendums to the contract documents that may become necessary during the project bid period. (One addendum assumed that will require AECOM assistance).
AECOM 3
Assumptions:
• City personnel will advertise and issue all addenda.
Task 3 – Construction Phase
3.1 Pre-Construction Meeting Attendance. AECOM’s Project Manager and Project Engineer will attend the pre-construction conference to be held at the City with the Contractor, City Construction Division personnel, and City Design personnel.
Assumptions:
• It is assumed that the City’s personnel will prepare the agenda for the meeting and facilitate the meeting. It is also assumed that AECOM will assist with the agenda as needed. AECOM will prepare a memorandum to the City following the meeting.
3.2 Review Submittals / Shop Drawings/ RFI. AECOM will review submittals / shop drawings and Requests for Information (RFI) produced by the project contractor as requested by the City’s construction team. The review will be for general conformance with the design concept of the project and general compliance with the plans and specifications.
Assumptions:
• It is assumed that the Contractor shall have an acceptable submittal upon the second submission.
• It is assumed not more than twelve (12) submittals and seven (7) RFIs will be reviewed.
3.3 AECOM electrical engineer will perform a site visit to field verify electrical and instrumentation installation.
Assumptions:
• It is assumed that no more than one (1) site visit will occur.
3.4 Support the Preparation of Change Orders. AECOM personnel will be available to aid the City of Bakersfield construction team in the generation of Contract Change Orders as needed during the construction phase of the project.
Assumptions:
• It is assumed that no more than one (1) contract change order will be necessary.
3.5 Project Construction Site Visits and Meetings. AECOM project personnel will be available to make construction site visits at key points as requested by the City’s project manager.
Assumptions:
• It is assumed that no more than four (4) total site visits and/or meetings will be necessary.
AECOM 4
SCHEDULE
Kickoff Meeting 2 weeks from Notice to Proceed
Technical Memorandum 2 months from Notice to Proceed
90% Deliverable 5 months from Notice to Proceed
100% Deliverable 6 weeks from receipt of City comments
BUDGET
Design Phase: $ 118,000 Fixed Fee
Bidding Phase: $ 9,000 Time & Materials
Construction Phase: $ 25,000 Time & Materials
Total: $ 152,000
We appreciate the opportunity to work with the City on this important project.
Yours sincerely,
William C. Black, PE Ben P. Horn, PE
Project Manager Managing Engineer
Attachment: Rate Sheet
Project Budget
Project Budget
WWTP Blower Replacement City of Bakersfield
Budget
Task Description Specialty Principal Principal Engineer III Engineer II Engineer I Project Engineer II CAD Technician Engineering Tech Total Hours Labor Non-Labor Fee Total Task 1 - Design Phase
Kickoff Meeting & Site Visit including minutes 8 8 0 16 6 38 $ 6,810 $ 204 $ 7,014 Concept Plan and Process Control Narrative 2 2 0 24 2 2 10 42 $ 6,480 $ 194 $ 6,674 Technical Specifications 8 12 0 36 12 16 84 $ 14,120 $ 424 $ 14,544 Plans - $ - $ - $ -
- General Sheets (Cover, notes, symbols abbreviations, Demo Plan)- 3 sheets 8 0 8 12 24 52 $ 7,280 $ 218 $ 7,498 - Mechanical Sheets (Process control, Piping schematic, Equipment layout, Piping layout) 5 sheets 8 16 0 32 26 24 60 166 $ 24,560 $ 737 $ 25,297 - Structural Sheets (General and notes, Foundations and Canopy) 5 sheets 4 28 0 30 0 32 94 $ 15,440 $ 463 $ 15,903 - Electrical & Instrumentation 10 sheets 26 2 8 24 60 18 60 198 $ 29,160 $ 519 $ 29,679 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 4 4 4 16 2 30 $ 4,680 $ 140 $ 4,820 Quality Control & Project Management 8 8 8 28 4 6,380 $ 191 $ 6,571 $ Subtotal 84 68 20 128 174 44 188 26 732 114,910 $ 3,090 $ 118,000 $ Task 2 - Bidding Phase
Attend Pre-Bid Meeting 3 3 6 $ 1,110 $ 33 $ 1,143
Respond to Bidder RFIs (Assume 5) 5 10 2 17 $ 2,840 $ 85 $ 2,925 Prepare Addenda (Assume 1) 2 4 4 4 4 2 20 $ 3,090 $ 93 $ 3,183 Review Bids and recommend lowest responsible bid 2 2 4 11 3 1,625 $ 124 $ 1,749 $ Subtotal 2 2 12 19 8 - 4 7 54 8,665 $ 335 $ 9,000 $
Task 3 - Construction Phase
Attend Pre-Construction Meeting 4 4 1 9 $ 1,655 $ 50 $ 1,705 Respond to RFIs (Assume 7) 2 4 5 10 21 $ 3,870 $ 116 $ 3,986 Review Submittals (Assume 12) 4 8 12 18 6 48 $ 9,360 $ 164 $ 9,524 Electrical Site Visit 12 12 $ 3,240 $ 97 $ 3,337
Change Order (Assume 1) 4 6 4 4 4 0 - 22 $ 4,460 $ 134 $ 4,594 Field Visits & Meetings (Assume 4) 4 0 6 1,800 10 $ 54 $ 1,854 $ Subtotal 26 22 17 22 30 4 - 1 122 24,385 $ 615 $ 25,000 $ Total 112 92 49 169 212 48 192 34 908 147,960 $ 4,040 $ 152,000 $ Personnel Hours
1/17/2023 Page 1 of 1
RESOLUTION NO 1 5 ? 2 022
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD APPROVING AN ON -CALL LIBRARY OF
PROFESSIONAL FIRMS QUALIFIED TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES INCLUDING STUDIES, SURVEYING AND MAPPING,
PLANNING, ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN,
PROJECT MANAGEMENT, AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
SERVICES; AND ADOPTING A UNIFORM HOURLY RATE
SCHEDULE FOR THE LIBRARY; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE( S), TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENTS
WITH QUALIFIED FIRMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BAKERSFIELD
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 3.20. 105.
WHEREAS, professional surveying, planning, architectural, engineering, and inspection services are frequently necessary for studies, projects, and programs within the City' s Five-year Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the adopted Fiscal Year 22-23 Five -Year Capital Improvement Program across all funding sources totals $196. 6 million; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Department, in conjunction with other City Departments (" Collectively " Departments"), desire to establish an on -call Library of Professional Firms ( hereinafter " Library") that identifies prequalified firms to perform professional services on various projects included in the City' s five-year Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the development of a three ( 3) year Library with two one-year renewals, provides Departments the opportunity to either immediately select a firm for a project or establish a brief, yet focused evaluation process amongst qualified firms, thereby establishing an alternative to the standard Request for Proposal ( RFP) process that can take up to three months to complete; and
WHEREAS, a three ( 3)- year uniform hourly rate schedule for personnel and overhead costs allows Departments to simplify and streamline future individual Agreements with firms in the Library by focusing negotiated items to tasks and time; and WHEREAS, nothing in this Resolution prevents or prohibits any City Department from conducting an individual project solicitation by RFP or any other approved means of procurement; and
WHEREAS, authorization of Agreements under this Library will comply with Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 3.20. 105; and
WHEREAS, on June 9, 2022, staff issued a public notice informing professional surveying and mapping, architectural, and engineering firms of an opportunity to respond to a Request for Qualifications ( RFQ) process with the intent of qualifying gP,
OORIGINO
multiple firms to assist the City with a broad range of projects that were listed and described within the solicitation; and
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2022, staff held a non -mandatory meeting with all interested proposers to review the solicitation and answer questions; and WHEREAS, on July 29, 2022, twenty-seven ( 27) firms responded to the City' s solicitation by formally submitting staff and firm qualifications and experience, numerous project references, and their hourly billing rate schedule for consideration; and
WHEREAS, the City assembled an evaluation committee made up of the Recreation and Parks Department, Economic Development Department, Building Department, and Public Works Department to review submittals and qualifying firms by professional discipline; and
WHEREAS, the evaluation committee met on August 9, 2022 and August 18, 2022, and developed the recommendation for the Library, as listed in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein; and
WHEREAS, a Uniform Hourly Rate Schedule, as provided in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein ( hereinafter referred to as " Rate Schedule"), has been developed by the Public Works Department by compiling the submitted 2022 rate schedules from each qualified firm for various positions; and WHEREAS, the qualified firms in the Library have agreed to the Rate Schedule and its use when developing the negotiated cost for professional services related to all personnel and overhead costs within individual project Agreements for the next three years; and
WHEREAS, the City may review adjustments to the Rate Schedule that are tied to the Los Angeles -Long Beach-Anaheim/ All Urban Consumers Consumer Price Index at the fourth and fifth renewal years, if those years are added to an Agreement; and WHEREAS, funding for agreements will be paid for through project budgets as approved or amended by City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows:
The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.
2. This Resolution designates an on -call Library of Professional Firms ( Exhibit A) that have been competitively selected, deemed qualified by experience and expertise, and approved to enter into professional service agreements with the City.
ORIGINAL
3. This Resolution establishes a Uniform Rate Schedule ( Exhibit B) that shall be used for developing personnel and overhead costs for the professional services.
4. The City Manager and/ or designee( s) are authorized to enfer into agreements with qualified firms listed in the Library.
5. Agreements authorized between the City and firms in the Library shall comply with the Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 3. 20. 105.
6. The City Clerk shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and it shall become effective immediately upon its approval.
HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the CounftIIT A 2 f
City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
A BSTA I N:
COUNCIL MEMBER ARIAS, GONZALES,-YdfR, SMITH, FREEMAN, GRAY, PARLIER
COUNCIL MEMBER
COUNCIL MEMBER
COUNCIL MEMBER WearAPPROVED OCT 0 5 2022
By
KARE GOH
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
VIRGINIA GENNARO, CITY ATTORNEY
SHUA RUDNICK
puty City Attorney
JHR/ vlg
SACOUNCIL\ ResosX22- 23\ LibraryQualifiedfirms. Reso. doe ULIE DR.I MAKIS, MMC
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of the
Council of the City of Bakersfield
L
ORIGINAL
Exhibit A"
On -Call Library of Professional Firms
F_ mr
ORIQINAL
1 AECOM
2 Ardurra Group, Inc.
3 Diversified Project Services International
4 EXP US Services, Inc
5 New Gen Engineering Group Inc. (f. k. a. McInt:
6 Parsons
6 7
8 oCIT Y 0
1;
AECOM
EXP US Services, Inc
NV5, Inc
New Gen Engineering Group Inc. (f.k. a. Mcl
Parsons
V& Alnc
4 Creeks, Inc
IBI Group
New Gen Engineering Group Inc. (f.k. a. Mclntos
Ordiz-Melby, Inc
Quad Knopf Inc
PlaceWorks
Toole Design Group
4 Creeks, Inc
AECOM
Ardurra Group, Inc.
BHT Engineering, Inc
Dewalt Corporation
J Project Services Inti
EXP US Services, Inc
IBI Grouo
New Gen Engineering Group Inc. (f.k. a.
Meyer Civil Engineering Inc
NV5, Inc
Ordiz- Melbv, Inc
5001 E. Commercenter Or Ste 100 1 Bakersfield CA 93309 Ben Horn 661-283- 2328 1401 Commercial Way Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Dolores Salgado 661-529- 2190 5351 Olive Drive Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93308 Robert Chambers 661-371-2800 330 North Boulevard Ste 950 Glendale CA 91203 Anh Case 818- 539-1110 1) 2001 Wheelan Court Bakersfield CA 93309 Blaine Neptune 661-834-4814 9600 Ming Avenue Ste 310 Bakersfield CA 93311 Gregory Z Gharib 661- 699-1100 Construction Management & Inspections (roadway, structural, materials testing, etc.) 5001 E. Commercenter Dr Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Ben Horn 661-283-2328 330 North Boulevard Ste 950 Glendale CA 91203 Anh Case 818-539- 1110 2109 West Bullard Avenue Ste 145 Fresno CA 93711 Jeff Pallesen 559- 661- 5220 1) 2001 Wheelan Court Bakersfield CA 93309 Blaine Neptune 661-834-4814 9600 Ming Avenue Ste 310 Bakersfield CA 93311 Gregory Z Gharib 661-699- 1100 5100 California Ave Ste 106 Bakersfield CA 93309 Jose Valle 805-403- 7300 Building Commissioning Services
5500 Ming Avenue ISte 280 1 Bakersfield CA I 93309 Jeannie Bertolaccini 661-832- 5258 Urban Planning and Design
324 S. Santa Fe Street Ste A Visilia Ca 93292 Lisa Wallis- Dutra 559-802-3052 75 East Santa Clara St Ste 100 San lose CA 95113 Jennifer Moore 408-924-0811 660 South Figueroa Street Ste 2050 Los Angeles Ca 90017 Nicole Dias 213-261-4040 h) 2001 Wheelan Court Bakersfield CA 93309 Blaine Neptune 661-834-4814 5500 Ming Avenue Ste 280 Bakersfield CA 93309 Jeannie Bertolaccini 661-832- 5258 5080 California Avenue Ste 220 Bakersfield CA 93309 Cathy Williams 661- 616-260C 3 MacArthur Place Ste 1100 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Randal W Jackson 714-966-922C 527 West 7th Street Ste 701 Los Angeles Ca 900141 Roger Pelayo 213- 257-868C Civil Engineering
324 S. Santa Fe Street Ste A Visilia Ca 93292 Lisa Wallis- Dutra 559- 802-3052 5001 E. Commercenter Dr Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Ben Horn 661-283-2328 1401 Commercial Way Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Dolores Salgado 661- 529-219C 218 S. H Street Ste 201 Bakersfield CA 93304 Juan Pantoja 661-558-4641 1930 22nd Street Bakersfield CA 93301 Michael Todd Wood 661-323-460C 5351 Olive Drive Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93308 Robert Chambers 661-371-280C 330 North Boulevard Ste 950 Glendale CA 91203 Anh Case 818- 539- 111C 75 East Santa Clara St Ste 100 San Jose CA 95113 Jennifer Moore 408-924-0811 660 South Figueroa Street Ste 2050 Los Angeles Ca 90017 Nicole Dias 213-261-404C h) 2001 Wheelan Court Bakersfield CA 93309 Blaine Neptune 661-834-4814 11200 River Run Blvd Ste 102 Bakersfield CA 93311 Richard Meyer 661-836- 9834 2109 West Bullard Avenue Ste 145 Fresno CA 93711 Jeff Pallesen 559-661-522C 5500 Ming Avenue Ste 280 Bakersfield CA 93309 Jeannie Bertolaccini 661-832- 525£ 14 15
16 17
18 CIT Y 0
z ray
Parsons 9600 Ming Avenue Ste 310 Bakersfield CA 93311 Gregory Z Gharib 661-699- 1100 GreEorv.Gharib@parsons. com Quad Knopf Inc 5080 California Avenue Ste 220 Bakersfield CA 93309 Cathy Williams 661-616- 2600 [email protected] Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers 1800 30th Street Ste 260 Bakersfield CA 93301 Ian Parks 661-327- 1969 ioarks@rscivil. com Toole Design Group 527 West 7th Street Ste 701 Los Angeles Ca 90014 Roger Pelayo 213-257- 8680 rpelavo@tooledesien. com V & A Inc 5100 California Ave Ste 106 Bakersfield CA 93309 Jose Valle 805-403- 7300 lose. [email protected] Electrical Engineering
AECOM 5001 E. Commercenter Dr Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Ben Horn 661-283- 2328 ben. [email protected] Ardurra Group, Inc. 1401 Commercial Way Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Dolores Salgado 661-529- 2190 dsalgado@ardurra. com EXP US Services, Inc 330 North Boulevard Ste 950 Glendale CA 91203 Anh Case 818-539- 1110 anh. case@exp. com IBI Group 75 East Santa Clara St Ste 100 San Jose CA 95113 Jennifer Moore 408-924- 0811 iennifer.moore@ibigroup. com Meyer Civil Engineering Inc 11200 River Run Blvd Ste 102 Bakersfield CA 93311 Richard Meyer 661-836-9834 [email protected] NV5, Inc 2109 West Bullard Avenue Ste 145 Fresno CA 93711 Jeff Pallesen 559- 661-5220 Jeff. Pallesen@nv5. com Ordiz-Melby, Inc 5500 Ming Avenue Ste 280 Bakersfield CA 93309 Jeannie Bertolaccini 661-832-5258 [email protected] Parsons
4 Creeks, Inc
9600 Ming Avenue
324 S. Santa Fe Street
Ste 310
Structural
Ste A
Bakersfield CA
Engineering
Visilia Ca
93311
93292
GregoryZ Gharib
Lisa Wallis- Dutra
661- 699-1100
559- 802-3052
[email protected]
lisawd@4-creeks. com
AECOM 5001 E. Commercenter Dr Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Ben Horn 661-283-2328 ben. horn Ca@aecom. com Ardurra Group, Inc. 1401 Commercial Way Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Dolores Salgado 661-529-2190 dsalgado@ardurra. com EXP US Services, Inc 330 North Boulevard Ste 950 Glendale CA 91203 Anh Case 818- 539- 1110 anh. case@exp. com IBI Group 75 East Santa Clara St Ste 100 San Jose CA 95113 Jennifer Moore 408- 924-0811 [email protected] Kimley- Horn 660 South Figueroa Street Ste 2050 Los Angeles Ca 90017 Nicole Dias 213-261-4040 nicole. [email protected] Meyer Civil Engineering Inc 11200 River Run Blvd Ste 102 Bakersfield CA 93311 Richard Meyer 661-836- 9834 rmever@meyerce. net NV5, Inc 2109 West Bullard Avenue Ste 145 Fresno CA 93711 Jeff Pallesen 559-661-5220 Jeff. Pallesen@nv5. com Ordiz- Melby, Inc 5500 Ming Avenue Ste 280 Bakersfield CA 93309 Jeannie Bertolaccini 661-832- 5258 [email protected] I Parsons 9600 Ming Avenue Ste 310 Bakersfield CA 93311 Gregory Z Gharib 661-699- 1100 Greeory.Gharib@parsons. com Transportation Engineering
4 Creeks, Inc 324 S. Santa Fe Street Ste A Visilia Ca 93292 Lisa Wallis- Dutra 559-802- 3052 [email protected] AECOM 5001 E. Commercenter Dr Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Ben Horn 661-283- 2328 ben. [email protected] t Ardurra Group, Inc. 1401 Commercial Way Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Dolores Salgado 661-529- 2190 dsaleado@ardurra. com I Dewalt Corporation 1930 22nd Street Bakersfield CA 93301 Michael Todd Wood 661-323- 4600 twoodPdewaltcorp. com i Diversified Project Services International 5351 Olive Drive Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93308 Robert Chambers 661-371- 2800 [email protected] i EXP US Services, Inc 330 North Boulevard Ste 950 Glendale CA 91203 Anh Case 818-539- 1110 anh. case@exp. com IBI Group 75 East Santa Clara St Ste 100 San Jose CA 95113 Jennifer Moore 408-924- 0811 lennifer.moore@ibieroun. com t Kimley-Horn 660 South Figueroa Street Ste 2050 Los Angeles Ca 90017 Nicole Dias 213- 261-4040 nicole. dias@kimley-horn. com i Meyer Civil Engineering Inc 11200 River Run Blvd Ste 102 Bakersfield CA 93311 Richard Meyer 661-836-9834 rmever@meverce. net I New Gen Engineering Group Inc. (f.k. a. McIntosh) 2001 Wheelan Court Bakersfield CA 93309 Blaine Neptune 661-834-4814 bneptune mcintoshassoc.com L NV5, Inc 2109 West Bullard Avenue Ste 145 Fresno CA 93711 Jeff Pallesen 559- 661-5220 Jeff. [email protected] Parsons 9600 Ming Avenue Ste 310 Bakersfield CA 93311 Gregory Z Gharib 661-699- 1100 Greeorv.Gharib@parsons. com t Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers 1800 30th Street Ste 260 Bakersfield CA 93301 Ian Parks 661-327-1969 ioarks@rscivil. com l Toole Design Group 527 West 7th Street Ste 701 Los Angeles Ca 90014 Roger Pelayo 213- 257-8680 rpelavo@tooledesien. com i V & A Inc 5100 California Ave Ste 106 Bakersfield CA 93309 Jose Valle 805-403-7300 jose.valle@va- incorp. com Mechanical Engineering (e.g. HVAC, pumps, plumbing, etc.) L AECOM 5001 E. Commercenter Dr Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Ben Horn 661-283-2328 ben. horn@aecom. com i Ordiz- Melby, Inc 5500 Ming Avenue Ste 280 Bakersfield CA 93309 Jeannie Bertolaccini 661-832-5258 [email protected] 3 Meyer Civil Engineering Inc 11200 River Run Blvd Ste 102 Bakersfield CA 93311 Richard Meyer 661-836-9834 rmever@meverce. net 4 NV5, Inc 12109 West Bullard Avenue ISte 145 Fresno CA I 93711 Jeff Pallesen 559- 661-5220 1 Jeff. PaIlesen@nv5. com CITY 0
0 1: 53
Parsons 19600 Ming Avenue Ste 310 Bakersfield CA 93311 Gregory Z Gharib 661-699- 1100 Gregory.Gharib@parsons. com AECOM 5001 E. Commercenter Dr Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Ben Horn 661-283- 2328 ben. horn@aecom. com EXP US Services, Inc 330 North Boulevard Ste 950 Glendale CA 91203 Anh Case 818- 539- 1110 anh. case@exp. com Kimley-Horn 660 South Figueroa Street Ste 2050 Los Angeles Ca 90017 Nicole Dias 213-261-4040 nicole. dias@kimlev-horn. com New Gen Engineering Group Inc. ( f.k. a. McIntosh) 2001 Wheelan Court Bakersfield CA 93309 Blaine Neptune 661-834-4814 bneptune@mcintoshassoc. com NV5, Inc 2109 West Bullard Avenue Ste 145 Fresno CA 93711 Jeff Pallesen 559-661- 5220 Jeff. Pallesen@nv5. com Parsons 9600 Ming Avenue Ste 310 Bakersfield CA 93311 GregoryZ Gharib 661-699- 1100 Greaory.Gharib[alparsons.com Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group Inc. 11800 30th Street Ste 280 Bakersfield CA 93301 Jeane Hill 661-616- 5900 ihill@ppene. com V & A Inc
AECOM
5100 California Ave
5001 E. Commercenter Dr
Ste
Ste 100
a ers e
I
Bakersfield CA
93309
93309
Jose Valle
Ben Horn
805-403- 7300
661-283- 2328
iose.valle@va- incorp. com
ben. horn@aecom. com
Ardurra Group, Inc. 1401 Commercial Way Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Dolores Salgado 661-529- 2190 dsaleado@ardurra. com Kimley- Horn 660 South Figueroa Street Ste 2050 Los Angeles Ca 90017 Nicole Dias 213-261-4040 nicole. dias@kimlev- horn. com Meyer Civil Engineering Inc 11200 River Run Blvd Ste 102 Bakersfield CA 93311 Richard Meyer 661-836- 9834 rmever@meverce. net Michael K Nunley & Associates, Inc 1800 21st Street Ste C Bakersfield CA 93301 Josh Nord 661-873- 4262 inord@mknassociates. us NV5, Inc 2109 West Bullard Avenue Ste 145 Fresno CA 93711 Jeff Pallesen 559- 661-5220 Jeff. Pal lesen0Dnv5. com Parsons 9600 Ming Avenue Ste 310 Bakersfield CA 93311 Gregory Z Gharib 661-699- 1100 Greeory.Gharib@parsons. com Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group Inc. 1800 30th Street ISte 280 1 Bakersfield CA I 93301 Jeane Hill 661-616-5900 hill@gpene. com Quad Knopf Inc 5080 California Avenue ISte 220 1 Bakersfield CA 1 933091 Cathy Williams 661-616-2600 [email protected] V & A Inc 5100 California Ave ISte 106 1 Bakersfield CA I 93309 Jose Valle 805- 403-7300 lose.valle@va- incorp.com Geotechnical Services
AECOM 5001 E. Commercenter Dr Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Ben Horn 661-283-2328 ben. horn@aecom. com BSK Associates 700 22nd Street Bakersfield CA 93301 Adam Terronez 661-327-0671 aterronez@bskassociates. com EXP US Services, Inc 330 North Boulevard Ste 950 Glendale CA 91203 Anh Case 818- 539- 1110 anh. case@exp. com NV5, Inc 2109 West Bullard Avenue Ste 145 Fresno CA 93711 Jeff Pallesen 559- 661-5220 Jeff. Pallesen@nv5. com Parsons 9600 Ming Avenue Ste 310 Bakersfield CA 93311 Gregory Z Gharib 661- 699- 1100 Greeory. Gharib@parsons. com i Pavement Engineering Inc 3485 Sacramento Drive Ste A San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Joe Ririe 805-781- 2265 [email protected] Landscape Architecture
AECOM 5001 E. Commercenter Dr Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Ben Horn 661-283- 2328 ben. horn@aecom. com IBI Group 75 East Santa Clara St Ste 100 San Jose CA 95113 Jennifer Moore 408- 924- 0811 iennifer. moore@ibigroup. com I Kimley-Horn 660 South Figueroa Street Ste 2050 Los Angeles Ca 90017 Nicole Dias 213-261- 4040 nicole. dias@kimlev-horn. com I Meyer Civil Engineering Inc 11200 River Run Blvd Ste 102 Bakersfield CA 93311 Richard Meyer 661-836-9834 [email protected] i Moore lacofano Goltsman, Inc 109 W Union Ave Fullerton CA 92832 Steve Lang 714-871-3638 stevel@miecom. com i NV5, Inc 2109 West Bullard Avenue Ste 145 Fresno CA 93711 Jeff Pallesen 559-661- 5220 Jeff. Pallesen@nv5. com Parsons 9600 Ming Avenue ISte 310 Bakersfield CA 93311 Gregory Z Gharib 661-699- 1100 [email protected] I PlaceWorks 3 MacArthur Place ISte 1100 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Randal W Jackson 714-966- 9220 Iriackson0placeworks.com i Quad Knopf Inc 5080 California Avenue ISte 220 Bakersfield CA 93309 Cathy Williams 661-616- 2600 ICathy.WilliamsCaDclkinc.com 1 Sustainable Recreation Design 524 N. Third St ISte 1 Bishop CA 93514 Anthony Perkins 714-469-4202 tone@srd-la. com Survey & Mapping Services (Geographic Information Systems) L 4 Creeks, Inc 324 S. Santa Fe Street Ste A Visilia Ca 93292 Lisa Wallis-Dutra 559-802- 3052 1isawd04-creeks. com Ardurra Group, Inc. 1401 Commercial Way Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93309 Dolores Salgado 661-529- 2190 dsaleado@ardurra. com I Dewalt Corporation 1930 22nd Street Bakersfield CA 93301 Michael Todd Wood 661-323- 4600 [email protected] I Diversified Project Services International 5351 Olive Drive Ste 100 Bakersfield CA 93308 Robert Chambers 661-371- 2800 robertc@dpsiinc. com i EXP US Services, Inc 330 North Boulevard Ste 950 Glendale CA 91203 Anh Case 818-539- 1110 anh. case@exp. com KSI Engineering, Inc 6205 District Boulevard Bakersfield CA 93313 Matthew J Lanzer 661-617- 1700 [email protected] Meyer Civil Engineering Inc 11200 River Run Blvd Ste 102 Bakersfield CA 93311 Richard Meyer 661-836-9834 rmever@meverce. net Moore lacofano Goltsman, Inc 109 W Union Ave Fullerton CA 92832 Oscar Johnson 714-871- 3638 rmever@meverce. net New Gen Engineering Group Inc. (f.k. a. McIntosh) 2001 Wheelan Court Bakersfield CA 93309 Blaine Neptune 661-834-4814 bneptuneCcDmcintoshassoc. com NVS, Inc 2109 West Bullard Avenue Ste 145 Fresno CA 93711 Jeff Pallesen 559-661-5220 Jeff. Pallesen0nv5. com Quad Knopf Inc 5080 California Avenue Ste 220 Bakersfield CA 93309 Cathy Williams 661-616-2600 ibertolaccini@ordizmelby. com Ruettgers & Schuler Civil Engineers 11800 30th Street Ste 260 Bakersfield CA 93301 Ian Parks 661-327- 1969 iparks@rscivil. com o
IT Y 0
c
1 313'
Exhibit B"
Uniform Rate Schedule
OORIGINP.L
Fee Schedule
Program/ Project Management & Administration
Program Director/ Principal in Charge 305.00
Principal/ Lead Project/ Program Manager 275.00
Assistant Project/ Program Manager 230.00
Senior Program/ Project Manager 205. 0.0
Project/ Program Manager 1 140.00
Project/ Program Manager II 160..00
Project/ Program Manager III 185.00
Safety Manager 135.00
Office Manager 85.00
Clerical 70.00
QA/ QC-Technical Manger/ Editor 1.30.00
Public Outreach Specialist 120.00
Construction Inspection & Building Commissioning
Services
Principal Construction Manager $ 260.00
Construction Manager $ 220.00
Construction Inspector/ Resident Engineer $ 155.00
Construction Site Representative $ 125.00.
Building Inspector $ 105.00
Urban Planning & Design
Senior Planner $ 170.00
Planner If $ 150.00
Planner 1 $ 135.00
Associate/ Assistant Planner $ 100.00
Engineering Services
Senior/ Lead/ Principal Engineer -Engineering Manager 270.00 Project/ Program. Engineer 1 1.20.00
Project/ Program. Engineer II 160.00
Project/ Program Engineer III 210.00
Structural Engineer 160.00
Senior Structural Engineer 220.00
Engineering Aide/ Technician 95.00
Assistant Environmental Scientist 100.00
Associate Environmental Scientist 130.00
Senior Environmental Scientist 180.00
Specialty Professional/ Discipline 275.00.
CAD Designer 125.00
CAD Technician 100.00
SUE Technician 125.00
SWPPP Practitioner 150.00
Landscape Architectural Services
Senior Landscape Artist
Landscape Architect
Architectural Services
Principal Architect
Senior/Associate Architect
Architect,
Surveying -Mapping -Graphics
3- Person Survey Crew
2- Person Survey Crew
1- Person Survey Crew
Survey Coordinator/ Director
Assistant Surveyor
GIS Analyst
GIS. Specialist
Graphic Designer
Drone Operator with Camera
195.00
165. 00
220.00
205.00
190.00
380.00
300.00
200.00
180.00
110..00
150.00
145.0.0
100.00
180.00
ORIGINAL
AECOM
5001 E. Commercenter Drive
Suite 100
Bakersfield, CA 93309
www.aecom.com
661 325 7253 tel
Mr. Husain Ali
Engineer II
6901 McCutchen Road
Bakersfield, CA 93313
January 12, 2024
Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 3 Blower Replacement (E3K305) – Request for Amendment No. 1 Dear Ali:
The City of Bakersfield requested that our scope of work for the subject project be expanded to include replacing pressure relief valves, sediment traps, flame arrestors, and back-pressure relief valves for Digesters 3 through 6. We have prepared initial drawings and reviewed them with Brian Villacorta and Jim Groman who represent Varec Biogas. Following that review, our design scope was adjusted to also include a manhole pressure relief cover which is a new code requirement for digesters. The total price of the construction contract with this change should be in the range of $550,000 to $750,000. Our proposed fee increase is to provide design, bid-phase and engineering services for construction is summarized below and included in the attached staffing plan.
Summary
Design: Design services consist of two site visits, research of codes and coordination with vendors, selection of equipment and preparation of design with structural checks, prepare two drawings (one plan and one for sections and details, an additional specification section, addition to the engineering opinion of probable construction cost.
$16,300
Bidding Phase: Added services only include one more RFI. Other items are covered by our original contract.
700
Construction Phase: Engineering services during construction will consist of answering one additional RFI and two additional submittals. Other engineering services offered during construction are covered by our original contract.
2,000
Budgetary impact on total project $19,000
If you concur with the budget increase to our contract, please authorize by signing below. If you have questions regarding the addition of scope and/or fee or require further justification, please do not hesitate to call.
Yours sincerely,
William C. Black, PE
Project Manager
Accepted:
Eric Garibay, PE
Principal in Charge
City of Bakersfield
S:\City of Bakersfield\60702402 - WWTP 3 Blower Replacement\100_Contract [CONT]\110_Client_Contract [CL_CONT]\Amendment one\Added time for engineering services during construction.docx Budget
Task Description
Specialty PrincipalPrincipalEngineer IIIEngineer IIEngineer IProject Engineer IICAD TechnicianEngineering TechTotal HoursLaborNon-Labor FeeTotal Task 1 - Design Phase
Site Visits for design (assume 2) 2 0 4 4 10 $ 1,660 $ 50 $ 1,710 Research codes and with Vendors 2 0 4 8 14 $ 2,300 $ 69 $ 2,369 Design including structural check 4 12 8 24 $ 3,800 $ 114 $ 3,914 Plan Drawings (two) - $ - $ - $ -
Plan view 2 2 12 16 $ 1,760 $ 53 $ 1,813
Sections and details 2 4 12 18 $ 2,080 $ 62 $ 2,142
Additional specification section 2 4 6 $ 880 $ 26 $ 906 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 2 4 2 8 $ 1,580 $ 47 $ 1,627 Quality Control & Project Management 2 2 2 2 3 11 $ 1,765 $ 54 $ 1,819 Subtotal 8 4 6 - 26 32 28 3 107 $ 15,825 $ 475 $ 16,300 Task 2 - Bidding Phase
Attend Pre-Bid Meeting (already included) - $ - $ - $ - Respond to Bidder RFIs (One additional) 1 2 1 4 $ 685 $ 15 $ 700 Prepare Addenda (One assumed for project. No additional assumed with this change) - $ - $ - $ - Review Bids and recommend lowest responsible bid (already included) - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal - 1 - - - - 2 1 4 $ 685 $ 15 $ 700
Task 3 - Construction Phase
Attend Pre-Construction Meeting (Already included) - $ - $ - $ - Respond to RFIs (One additional) 1 2 1 4 $ 685 $ 15 $ 700 Review Submittals (two additional) 1 2 4 1 8 $ 1,245 $ 55 $ 1,300 Electrical Site Visit (not required for change) - $ - $ - $ - Change Order (Assume 1)(already included with main project) - $ - $ - $ - Field Visits & Meetings (Assume 4)(already included with main project) - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal - 2 - - 2 - 6 2 12 $ 1,930 $ 70 $ 2,000
Total 8 7 6 - 28 40 28 6 123 $ 18,440 $ 560 $ 19,000
Personnel Hours
1/12/2024 Page 1 of 1
AECOM
5001 E. Commercenter Drive
Suite 100
Bakersfield, CA 93309
www.aecom.com
Mr. Husain Ali, PE
Engineer II
Department of Water Resources, Wastewater Division
City of Bakersfield
6901 McCutchen Road
Bakersfield, CA 93313
May 7
th, 2025
Subject: Proposal for Amendment #2 for Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 3 Blower Replacement (E3K305) Dear Ali:
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (AECOM) is currently assisting the City of Bakersfield (City) with construction engineering services for the subject project per the City’s Agreement No. 2023-024 as amended. The equipment manufacturer for the blower skids has a procurement lead time of 40 weeks, extending the construction phase past what was originally anticipated during the preparation of the proposal. To date, we have received the anticipated number of Requests for Information (RFI’s) in the original scope of work and anticipate receiving additional RFI’s when construction on the blower skids begins. In addition, during the contractor’s preconstruction efforts, it was found that the MCC room did not have the ability to accommodate breakers for the new chillers resulting in an increase in the number of RFI’s, meetings, and revisions to the design. Separately, the City requested to add the replacement of the master control panel and revision of the blower panels manufacturer from Allen Bradley to Schneider Electric which will result in additional support efforts.
The extensive construction phase timeline, additional RFI’s, and revisions to the electrical design will result in an overrun of the existing budget. AECOM anticipates that additional time will be needed of AECOM to resolve issues that may arise as well as responding to additional submittals and RFI’s.
AECOM anticipates additional scope as follows:
RFI’s and Submittals:
A total of 12 RFI’s and 9 submittals have been received to date with no major construction taken place yet. It is anticipated that additional support will be needed when construction begins as follows. • Respond to an additional 14 RFI’s.
• Review an additional 2 Submittals. (master control panel, and blower skids control panel resubmittal) Electrical Changes
• Per the City’s direction, the Blower Master Control Panel will be replaced. Its replacement was not part of the original scope of work. No design changes are anticipated, however; the additional effort includes time to support the City to integrate the change into the project including attending additional meetings and an additional submittal review.
• The lack of room in MCC-5 to fit the breakers and buckets for the blowers and the chillers (RFI 003) led to revisions to the electrical design drawings including the addition of an electrical panel. This change is considered a betterment to the project as the efforts alleviate the congestion in the MCC room. This resulted in additional efforts from AECOM.
AECOM has exhausted our current construction phase engineering budget of $27,000 and is respectfully requesting that the City consider issuing an amendment in the amount of $26,512.50 to provide additional construction phase engineering support services. We are proposing the City reallocate unused budget of $6,512.50 from the Bidding phase to the Construction phase for this work, resulting in a net change order of $20,000.00. Our proposed fee increases is summarized below and detailed in the attached staffing plan.
Previous Task Total Amendment 2 Change New Task Total
Task 1: Design Phase (LS) $134,300.00 $0.00 $134,300.00 Task 2: Bidding Phase (T&M) $9,700.00 -$6,512.50 $3,187.50 Task 3: Cons. Support (T&M) $27,000.00 $26,512.50 $53,512.50 Total $171,000.00 $20,000.00 $191,000.00
We appreciate your review and look forward to your response. If you have questions regarding the addition of scope and/or fee or require further justification, please do not hesitate to call.
Yours sincerely,
Yeimy G. Fernandez-Ojeda, PE
Project Manager
Accepted:
Eric Garibay, PE
Principal in Charge
City of Bakersfield
S:\City of Bakersfield\60702402 - WWTP 3 Blower Replacement\100_Contract [CONT]\110_Client_Contract [CL_CONT]\Amendment one\Added time for engineering services during construction.docx Project Budget - Amendment No. 2
WWTP Blower Replacement City of Bakersfield
Budget
Task Description
Specialty PrincipalPrincipalSenior IISenior IAssociateCAD SupervisorCAD OperatorClericalTotal HoursLaborNon-Labor FeeTotal Task 1 - Design Phase
Kickoff Meeting & Site Visit including minutes - $ - $ - Concept Plan and Process Control Narrative - $ - $ - $ - Technical Specifications - $ - $ - $ -
Plans - $ - $ - $ -
- General Sheets (Cover, notes, symbols abbreviations, Demo Plan)- 3 sheets - $ - $ - $ - - Mechanical Sheets (Process control, Piping schematic, Equipment layout, Piping layout) 5 sheets - $ - $ - $ -
- Structural Sheets (General and notes, Foundations and Canopy) 5 sheets - $ - $ - $ - - Electrical & Instrumentation 10 sheets - $ - $ - $ -
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost - $ - $ - $ -
Quality Control & Project Management - $ - $ - $ -
Subtotal - - - - - - - - - $ - $ - $ -
Task 2 - Bidding Phase
Attend Pre-Bid Meeting $ - $ - $ -
Respond to Bidder RFIs (Assume 5) $ - $ - $ -
Prepare Addenda (Assume 1) $ - $ - $ -
Review Bids and recommend lowest responsible bid $ - $ - $ - Subtotal - - - - - - - - - $ - $ - $ -
Task 3 - Construction Phase
Attend Pre-Construction Meeting - - $ - $ - $ -
Respond to RFIs (Assume 14 Additional) 4 8 30 5 47 $ 7,855 $ 236 $ 8,091 Review Submittals (Assume 2 Additional) 4 8 5 17 $ 3,055 $ 92 $ 3,147 Electrical Support for Addition of MCP 2 2 4 12 5 25 $ 4,145 $ 124 $ 4,269 Electrical Support Change in MCC (RFI #003) 8 2 6 12 10 4 42 $ 7,320 $ 266 $ 7,586 Electrical Site Visit - $ - $ - $ -
Change Order - $ - $ -
Field Visits & Meetings (Assume 2) 4 4 6 2 16 $ 3,320 $ 100 $ 3,420 Subtotal 22 8 32 - 54 10 - 21 147 $ 25,695 $ 818 $ 26,513 Total 22 8 32 - 54 10 - 21 147 $ 25,695 $ 818 $ 26,512.50 Personnel Hours
5/7/2025 Page 1 of 1
AECOM
5001 E. Commercenter Dr., Suite 100
Bakersfield, CA 93309
March 23, 2026
Jesus Banuelos
Water Department, Wastewater Division
City of Bakersfield
6901 McCutchen Road
Bakersfield, CA 93313
Subject: Proposal for Amendment No. 3 to the Plant 3 Blowers Replacement Project Dear Jesus,
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (AECOM) is pleased to submit this scope of work, fee proposal, and schedule to the City of Bakersfield (City) for additional construction phase services for the Plant 3 Blowers Replacement Project.
SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 3 – CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
1. Attend Meetings. AECOM’s project manager will attend up to ten (10) meetings via conference call of a duration not to exceed 1 hour each.
2. Site Visits. AECOM’s project manager will conduct up to four (4) site visits at Plant 3 with a duration not to exceed 2 hours each. Site visits will be as requested by the City.
3. Submittal. AECOM will review up to fifteen (15) shop drawings and/or submittals.
4. RFIs. AECOM will respond to not more than thirty (30) RFIs.
5. Change Order Assistance. AECOM will assist the City in preparing for not more than two (2) construction change orders. This work is limited to providing technical assistance, revising specifications, or revising drawings.
6. Prepare Record Drawings. AECOM will prepare record drawings based on field markups provided by the contractor. AECOM will not independently verify the accuracy of these markups. Record drawings will be prepared after the project is deemed substantially complete by the City.
FEE
Original $ 152,000
Amendment No. 1 $ 19,000
Amendment No. 2 $ 20,000
Amendment No. 3 $ 47,300
Total $ 238,300
We appreciate the opportunity to assist the City with this important project.
Yours sincerely,
Daniel Cronquist, PE, PLS Eric Garibay, PE
Department Manager Managing Engineer
Project Budget
Amendment No. 3 Plant 3 Blower Replacement City of Bakersfield Budget
Task Description
Specialty ProfessionalProject Enginer IIIProject Enginer IITotal HoursLaborNon-Labor FeeTotal Task 0003 - Construction Phase Services
Attend Meetings (Assume 10) 10 10 $ 2,750 $ 2,750
Site Visits (Assume 4) 8 8 $ 2,200 $ 200 $ 2,400
Submittals (Assume 15) 15 45 60 $ 10,350 $ 10,350
RFIs (Assume 30) 15 60 75 $ 12,750 $ 12,750
Change Order Assistance (Assume 2) 6 20 10 36 $ 7,450 $ 7,450 Prepare Record Drawings 40 20 60 $ 11,600 $ 11,600
Total 24 90 135 249 $ 47,100 $ 200 $ 47,300
Personnel Hours
3/23/2026 Page 1 of 1
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent -Agreement TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Gary Hallen, Assistant City Manager
DATE: April 7, 2026
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2023-105 with Bender Rosenthal Inc. (to exercise the extension of the agreement until May 10, 2028) for right-of-way acquisition services.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the amendment.
BACKGROUND: As the City continues to grow, we continue to expand our roads, to redevelop our Economic and Redevelopment areas, with our real property acquisitions, disposal of excess lands, and property management needs. The City does not currently have sufficient staffing and expertise in these fields to handle the current and upcoming workload in-house. The City has an immediate need for assistance with projects and specific council objectives to assist with redevelopment and blighted properties.
Therefore, in 2022 the City sent out a Request for Proposals for right of way and real estate services. As a result, on May 10, 2023, the City entered On -Call agreements with Overland Pacific & Cutler, Inc. (OPC) and Bender Rosenthal Inc. (BRI) to create a bench to perform the services needed on a timely basis as to not interfere with upcoming project deadlines.
On May 14, 2025 the City and Consultants entered Amendment 1 for one year extension to extend the term to May 10, 2026.
The City and Consultants now wish to exercise their option to extend their contracts for two years to now expire on May 10, 2028.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The amendment of this agreement allow for the City to contract services in Real Estate that assists many departments, any department that uses these on call service will need to pay for and fund these by specific projects budgets.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Reliable Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:
Amendment 2 to Agreement 2023-105
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent - Agreements TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Randy McKeegan, Finance Director
DATE: April 8, 2026
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 4 to Agreement No. 2023-100 with Bowman Asphalt, Inc. (increase compensation by $1,000,000; revised not to exceed $5,614,800 and extend the term by one year) to continue the supply of earthmoving & equipment services.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend approval of the amendment.
BACKGROUND:
On April 26, 2023, the City Council approved the annual contract for the supply of earthmoving & equipment with Bowman Asphalt, Inc., in the amount of $2,614,800; renewable annually thereafter for four consecutive one-year periods.
This contract is utilized by multiple divisions within the Public Works Department (Solid Waste, Streets and Wastewater) and by the Water Resources Department. Multiple funding sources including, but not limited to, General, Refuse, Sewer, Water and Capital Outlay Funds will be utilized for this contract.
Per the terms of the contract, amendments increasing the contract and/or extending the contract have been approved as follows:
Amendment 1 approved August 23, 2023; expanded scope of work to incorporate construction of traffic speed bumps, and other traffic calming elements in support of the City Council adopted Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program.
Amendment 2 approved April 24, 2024; increased compensation by $1,000,000, and extended term by one year to April 25, 2025.
Amendment 3 approved April 23, 2025; increased compensation by $1,000,000, and extended term by one year to April 25, 2026.
If approved, Amendment No. 4 will increase compensation by $1,000,000 for a revised not to exceed amount of $5,614,800 and extend the term by one year to allow the continuance of earthmoving & equipment services to the term date of April 25, 2027.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are budgeted in multiple funding sources for this contract.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Reliable Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:
Signed Amendment
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent -Agreements TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Gary Hallen, Assistant City Manager
DATE: April 7, 2026
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 2023-104
with Overland, Pacific, and Cutler (to exercise the extension of the agreement until May 10, 2028, and update the fee schedule to their current rates and staffing) for right-ofway acquisition services.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of this amendment.
BACKGROUND:
As the City continues to grow, we continue to expand our roads, to redevelop our Economic and Redevelopment areas, with our real property acquisitions, disposal of excess lands, and property management needs. The City does not currently have sufficient staffing and expertise in these fields to handle the current and upcoming workload in-house. The City has an immediate need for assistance with projects and specific council objectives to assist with redevelopment and blighted properties.
Therefore, in 2022 the City sent out a Request for Proposals for right of way and real estate services. As a result, on May 10, 2023, the City entered On -Call agreements with Overland Pacific & Cutler, Inc. (OPC) and Bender Rosenthal Inc. (BRI) to create a bench to perform the services needed on a timely basis as to not interfere with upcoming project deadlines.
On May 2, 2025 we entered into amendment 2 to extend the term to May 10, 2026.
The City and Consultants now wish to exercise their option to extend their contracts for two years to now expire on May 10, 2028, and wish to update their fee schedule to their current rates and to indicate current key staff members.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The amendment of this agreement allow for the City to contract for services in Real Estate that assists many departments, any department that uses these on call service will need to pay for and fund these by specific projects budgets.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Reliable Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:
Amendment 3 to Agreement 2023-105
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent – Agreements TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Zachary Meyer, Public Works Director
DATE: March 30, 2026
SUBJECT: Contract Change Order No. 3 to Agreement No. 2022-278 with Day’s Generator Service, Inc. ($34,852.03; revised not to exceed $968,153.03) for the Backup Generator City Hall North.]
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the change order.
BACKGROUND:
The work to be performed consists, in general of procuring and installing one diesel powered generator at the City Hall North parking lot. Other work items include construction of concrete pad for the generator, block wall enclosure, solid steel gate, electrical connections, appurtenances, permitting (Building and Air Pollution Control Boards) and other items as necessary to have a full turnkey operation.
Change Order No.3 provides for repairs to the electrical trench in the alley behind City Hall North due to erosion caused by several days of heavy rain, which created the need for emergency repairs to address City staff and public safety concerns. The contractor agrees to remove all debris/sediment from the trench, backfill with sand, install additional steel trench plates and ramp plates with cold mix as needed to provide a safe transition for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The contractor agrees to do the above – mentioned work for the lump sum price of $34,852.03.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Project P1K319 is funded through the General Fund.
The total cost increase for Contract Change Order No. 3 is $34,852.03. The sum of all contract change orders to date, including change order # 3, results in a total project cost increase of $78,382.03 (8.8 percent increase of the original contract amount) as illustrated below.
Original Contract Amount
= $ 889,771.00
Total of Previous Change Order approved by council = $ 43,530.00 Current Contract Change Order # 3 = $ 34,852.03
Amended Contract Amount after Change Order = $ 968,153.03 Net Increase to Date = $ 78,382.03
COUNCIL GOAL:
Reliable Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:
Contract Change Order No. 3
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent - Agreements TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kristina Budak, Water Director
DATE: April 10, 2026
SUBJECT: Basin 1 to 9 Turnout Reconstruction Project
1. Contract Change Order No. 1 with Remedial Transportation Services (increase compensation $86,125.10) to reconstruction the Basin 1 to 9 Turnout.
2. Appropriate $86,126 from the Agricultural Water Fund Balance to the Water Department’s Capital Improvement Program budget for the project.
(Ward 5)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend approval of the contract change order and appropriation.
BACKGROUND:
The scope of work for this project in general consists of replacing the existing Basin 1 to 9 Turnout structure within the 2,800-Acre Groundwater Recharge Area. The work includes removal of the existing structure, regrading the project area, and construction of the new reinforced concrete turnout structure with slide gates.
Item 1:
During construction, Remedial Transportation Services (RTS) discovered an unidentified utility line that was in conflict with the turnout structures footprint. It was determined that the utility line was an active 18-inch diameter PVC water line that belonged to the Kern County Water Agency, which would need to be relocated. RTS submitted an RFI with a proposal to relocate the water line horizontally and vertically to avoid conflict with the turnout structure. It was determined that an expedited response to this matter would not only minimize project delays but also minimize the costs for remobilizing equipment that RTS has on site. The additional work to relocate the 18” waterline has a cost of $86,125.10.
Original Contract Amount = $829,787.00
Total of Previous Change Orders = $0
Current Contract Change Order = $86,125.10
Amended Contract Amount After Change Orders = $915,912.10 Net Increase to Date = $86,125.10
Item 2:
An appropriation of $86,126 from the Agricultural Water Fund is requested in order to fund the contract change order.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The funding source for this project is the Agricultural Water Fund; with approval of the requested appropriation, sufficient funds will be available in the Water Resources Capital Improvement Budget. This contract change order has no impact to the City’s General Fund.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Reliable Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:
2026-022 Change Order No. 1 – Signed
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent - Bids TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Zachary Meyer, Public Works Director
DATE: March 24, 2026
SUBJECT: Pavement Rehabilitation 2025-2026 SB1: Stockdale Highway from Buena Vista Road to Old River Road.
1. Accept bid and approve contract with Cen-Cal Construction ($2,574,999) for said project.
2. Authorize staff to approve, as necessary, up to $150,000 in City-controlled contingency for unforeseen conditions encountered during construction of project. (Ward 4 & 5)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of low bid, approval of contract, and approval of City-Controlled contingency.
BACKGROUND:
The work to be performed consists, in general, of pavement rehabilitation of Stockdale Highway from Buena Vista Road to Old River Road. Other items include roadway excavation of the existing asphalt concrete, construction of new pavement using Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) and Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt (R-HMA), installation of thermoplastics and green methacrylate striping and markings, bike lanes, adjustment of manhole covers, adjustment of monument encasements, and modifications of existing median noses.
This project was reviewed and designed at the highest level of consistency with the City’s Complete Street Policy
Item No. 1. The Engineer’s Estimate for this project is $2,686,000.00. The project is entirely funded through the Gas Tax Fund (GTF).
On March 19, 2026, the City received five (5) bids for this project. All five bids were deemed acceptable.
Those acceptable bids are as follows:
Cen-Cal Construction
31207 Denbeste Ct in amount of $2,574,999.00
Shafter, CA 93263
Griffith Company
1128 Carrier Parkway Ave in amount of $2,750,735.00
Bakersfield, CA 93308
Calmex Engineering, Inc.
2750 S. Lilac Ave in amount of $2,761,844.60
Bloomington, CA 92316
Boman Asphalt, Inc.
3333 Gibson Street in amount of $2,990,755.00
Bakersfield, CA 93308
C. A. Rasmussen, Inc.
28548 Livingston Ave in amount of $3,122,183.95
Valencia, CA 91355
Staff recommend acceptance of the bids and approval of the construction contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Cen-Cal Construction.
Item No. 2. Bakersfield Municipal Code section 3.20.105E authorizes Public Works Contract Amendments to be executed via Change Order, provided that Change Order which exceed $25,000 must be approved by the City Council. Staff is requesting pre-approval of up to $150,000 for City-controlled contingency for unforeseen conditions encountered during construction of this project, to be executed via Change Order(s). Any costs which exceed the City Council approved contingency, cumulative or otherwise, would require action and approval from the City Council. This City-controlled contingency will save staff time by not having to prepare multiple Council reports for individual routine change orders throughout the project, should they arise. All remaining contingency funds not used will be returned to the fund balance at the end of the project.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is $2,815,500 budgeted funds available in Project Number 26PWDE04, which is sufficient funding available for the contract award, construction engineering and inspection costs, as well as City controlled contingency amount. The funding for this project is available from the Gas Tax Fund; there is no impact the General Fund.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Reliable Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:
Agreement
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent-Miscellaneous TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Darin Budak, Director of Recreation and Parks
DATE: April 7, 2026
SUBJECT: Appropriate $27,000 from Kaiser Permanente Southern California Fund grant revenues to the Recreation and Parks
Operating Budget within the General Fund to provide swim lessons and passes to children and adults (Operation Splash). (Ward 2)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of appropriation.
BACKGROUND:
In February 2026, the City was awarded a two-year grant of $54,000 Operation Splash Grant from Kaiser Permanente Southern California Fund for the 2026 and 2027 summer swim seasons. The grant will be paid in two installments of $27,000 each. The City has received the first installment and the second installment will be received by 01/31/2027. The grant will provide discounted swim lessons, discounted Junior Lifeguarding classes, and summer season passes to low-income families. This is the eleventh consecutive year the City has received this grant.
Through this Operation Splash Grant the City will provide:
300 discounted $5 dollar swim lessons to income eligible children ages 3 to 17 years. 100 Operation Splash Passes to eligible children and adults to practice their swimming skills in Recreation Open Swim at City pools.
800 participants with valuable “Rethink Your Drink” and water safety education.
As always, staff thanks and recognizes Kaiser Permanente for its continued support of these important programs and water education opportunities.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact to the Recreation and Parks Operating Budget within the General Fund COUNCIL GOAL:
Innovative and Efficient City Government
Community Character & Quality of Life
ATTACHMENTS:
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent-Miscellaneous TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Zachary Meyer, Public Works Director
DATE: March 24, 2026
SUBJECT: Appropriate $750,000 from the Sewer Enterprise Fund (SEF) fund balance into the Public Works Department’s Capital Improvements Program within the (SEF) fund for the Sewer Improvements along Cottonwood Road from Pacheco Road to WWTP #2 project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the approval of the appropriation.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Bakersfield has a sewer improvements project along Cottonwood Road from Pacheco Road to Wastewater Treatment Plant #2 (WWTP #2) currently under construction, which was awarded on November 20, 2024, to Sierra Construction & Excavation, Inc. in the amount of $4,493,105.00. The funding for this project consisted of both American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) and Sewer Enterprise Funds (SEF). The actions at the City Council included the construction contract award, which included only the base bid and additive alternate #1 work, and $450,000 set aside for City-controlled contingency. However, due to staff oversight, the funding set aside for the contingency amount was returned back to fund balance, thus leaving the project underfunded.
The Base Bid included work associated with the gravity sewer line from the intersection of White Lane at Cottonwood Road to the Wastewater Treatment Plant #2; Additive Alternate No. 1 is work associated with the force main line from the Lift Station at Pacheco Road at Cottonwood to the intersection of White Lane at Cottonwood Road; and Additive Alternate No. 2 is the work associated with the construction of the Lift Station located at the corner of Pacheco Road at Cottonwood Road.
Due to environmental concerns associated with the project, the City had to pivot and eliminate portions of the work associated with the base bid and replace it with portions of work associated with additive alternate No. 2. Staff is requesting an appropriation from the Sewer Enterprise Fund in the amount of $750,000. This funding will cover the original $450,000 City-controlled contingency amount along with the changes in scope of work as mentioned above, which eliminated portions of the base bid and added portions of additive alternate No. 2, which increased the contract amount by approximately $300,000.
This appropriation will allow staff to continue with the project and deliver the spending of all ARPA funds before they lapse. This appropriation will be sufficient to pay for other change orders, City-controlled contingencies and City inspections staff time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This appropriation is entirely funded with Sewer Enterprise Funds (SEF); therefore, there is no general fund impact associated with this appropriation. After the completion of the appropriation, there will be sufficient funds available for City-controlled contingencies, change orders and city inspection staff time.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Reliable Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:
N/A
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent Misc.
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Greg Terry, Chief of Police
DATE: March 30, 2026
SUBJECT: 2026 SLESF Growth Funds Appropriation.
Appropriate $644,618.71 State Grant Revenues to the Police Operating Budget within the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of this appropriation.
BACKGROUND: Since the passage of the Citizen’s Option for Public Safety in 1996-97, the Bakersfield Police Department (BPD) has received an annual allocation from the State’s Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF). The program was designed to provide State funds to local law enforcement agencies for the purpose of addressing current front line law enforcement needs. Pursuant to state law, monies allocated from SLESF to a recipient entity shall be expended exclusively to provide front line law enforcement services. These monies shall supplement existing services and shall not be used to supplant any existing funding for law enforcement services provided by that entity.
FISCAL IMPACT: Each year’s SLESF allocation is distributed monthly over a 12-month period, then appropriated into the following year’s Department Operating Budget. The estimated FY2024-2024 SLESF allocation of $631,801.23 was appropriated by the City Council into the Police Operating Budget within the SLESF fund for FY2024-2025, as part of the annual budget adoption. Since the adoption of the budget, the BPD continues to receive monthly SLESF distributions from the State Department of Finance from the FY2024-25 allocation totaling $644,618.71. The Cumulative total of funds received from the FY2024-2025 State SLESF allocation is $1,276,419.94. Therefore, additional monies are used to augment the amount of funds already budgeted for police activities throughout the city. There is no General Fund impact.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Safety and Resilience
ATTACHMENTS:
Proof of Funds
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent - PSVS TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Darin Budak, Director of Recreation and Parks
DATE: April 7, 2026
SUBJECT: Design Consultant Agreement with QK design consultant (not to exceed $375,540) for Alondra Park Design project (Ward 5)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the agreement
BACKGROUND: CITY currently owns a 5-acre park site located near the northeast corner of Alondra Drive and Becklow Street known as Alondra Park (Project). The initial steps to develop and construct improvements to the park site require architectural and engineering design work. As part of the FY 2025- 26 Budget Process, Council approved project 26RP0001 for Design for Undeveloped Park Land Parcels.
On January 21, 2026, Council approved Resolution 009-2026 (Resolution) for an on-call library of professional firms (Library) qualified to provide professional services including studies, surveying and mapping, planning, architectural, engineering and design, project management, and construction inspection services. The Resolution stipulates a uniform hourly rate schedule for the Library and QK is a qualified professional consulting firm (Design Consultant).
On March 2, 2026, CITY via Recreation and Parks Department requested a scope of work, fee proposal, and schedule for providing services from the Design Consultant. The Design Consultant submitted a response to the request, which includes a Scope of Work, fee proposal, and schedule. The Design Consultant’s proposal in the amount of $375,540.00, was deemed acceptable by Staff as the rate structure aligned with the Resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT: There are sufficient funds available in the Capital Improvement Program within the Public Safety and Vital Services fund.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Community Character & Quality of Life
Reliable Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:
Alondra Park Design Consultant Agreement
____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 1 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Alondra Park\Alondra Park Design.docx AGREEMENT NO._________________
DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
This DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT is made and entered into on ______________________ (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and QK, a California Corporation, (“DESIGN CONSULTANT”).
R E C I T A L S
WHEREAS, CITY is currently in need of a design consultant for architectural/engineering design work for the Alondra Park, Project # 26RP0001 (the “Project”) which is a 5-acre park site located near the northeast corner of Alondra Drive and Becklow Street; and
WHEREAS, on January 21, 2026, Council approved Resolution 009-2026 approving an on-call library of professional firms (herein “Library”) qualified to provide professional services including studies, surveying and mapping, planning, architectural, engineering and design, project management, and construction inspection services; and
WHEREAS, Resolution 009-2026 stipulates a uniform hourly rate schedule for the Library; and
WHEREAS, DESIGN CONSULTANT is listed in the Library as a qualified professional consulting firm; and
WHEREAS, DESIGN CONSULTANT has provided on-call civil engineering services for CITY in the past; and
WHEREAS, for that reason, on March 2, 2026, CITY, via Recreation and Parks Department requested a scope of work, fee proposal, and schedule for providing services from DESIGN CONSULTANT for design and engineering for Project; and WHEREAS, DESIGN CONSULTANT submitted a response to the request, which includes a Scope of Work, fee proposal, and schedule; and WHEREAS, DESIGN CONSULTANT represents that it is experienced in the fields of architectural design and engineering as required for the Project and that all of its officers, partners, and/or principals are licensed professionals in engineering, architectural design, or similar professional areas with the appropriate professional degrees; and
____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 2 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Alondra Park\Alondra Park Design.docx WHEREAS, DESIGN CONSULTANT also represents that it has an adequate number of properly licensed and experienced employees on its staff to accomplish the Scope of Work, as defined below, and that it is competent to undertake the Scope of Work; and
WHEREAS, based on these representations and all other representations made by DESIGN CONSULTANT to CITY, CITY desires to retain DESIGN CONSULTANT to perform the Scope of Work.
NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the foregoing recitals herein, CITY and DESIGN CONSULTANT mutually agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF WORK. In exchange for the Compensation (defined below), DESIGN CONSULTANT must competently and thoroughly design and engineer the Project as more specifically described in the Request, attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, and in DESIGN CONSULTANT’s scope of work, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference (collectively, the project description in the RFP and DESIGN CONSULTANT’s scope of work are referred to as “Scope of Work”). The general scope of work is described as providing engineering and surveying services to the CITY for the project. DESIGN CONSULTANT’s services shall include all the procedures necessary to properly complete the Scope of Work, whether specifically included in the Scope of Work or not.
2. COMPENSATION/PAYMENT PROCEDURE. In exchange for performing the Scope of Work and subject to the terms of this section, CITY will pay DESIGN CONSULTANT according to the rate sheet attached as Exhibit B which also includes a Work Breakdown Schedule sheet and is incorporated by reference as follows (“Compensation”):
Actual Costs. CITY will reimburse DESIGN CONSULTANT’s actual costs (including labor costs, employee benefits, overhead, and other direct costs) in an amount not to exceed THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FORTY DOLLARS ($375,540.00), exclusive of any fixed fee.
CITY will pay DESIGN CONSULTANT within 30 days after DESIGN CONSULTANT submits an itemized invoice for the portions of the Scope of Work completed and that invoice is approved by CITY. The Compensation will be the total amount paid to DESIGN CONSULTANT for performing the Scope of Work and includes, but is not limited to, all out-of-pocket costs and taxes.
CITY will pay no other compensation to DESIGN CONSULTANT. In no case will CITY compensate DESIGN CONSULTANT more than THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FORTY DOLLARS ($375,540.00) for performing the Scope of Work.
____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 3 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Alondra Park\Alondra Park Design.docx
3. TERM. Unless terminated sooner as set forth herein, this Agreement shall five (5) years from date of execution listed above.
4. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE. Either party may terminate this Agreement after giving the other party written notice, as provided herein, ten days before the written termination is effective.
5. STARTING WORK. DESIGN CONSULTANT shall not begin work until authorized to do so in writing by CITY. No work will be authorized before the Effective Date.
6. TIME FOR COMPLETION. DESIGN CONSULTANT must complete all the initial design and construction documents phase as listed in Exhibit B Phase 1 and Phase 2 tasks, approved by the City, no later than 20 months of receipt of written authorization from the City. Phase 3 and Phase 4 tasks’ timeline will be determined at a future date and with availability of funding.
7. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR.
CITY’s Contract Administrator is:
Fidel Gonzalez
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
Telephone: (661) 326-3268
DESIGN CONSULTANT’s Project Manager shall be designated as:
Cathy Williams
QK
2080 California Avenue, Suite 220
Bakersfield, CA 93309
Telephone: (661) 616-2600
The Contract Administrator and the Project Manager shall be the primary contact persons for CITY and DESIGN CONSULTANT, respectively.
8. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS. DESIGN CONSULTANT shall, at DESIGN CONSULTANT’s sole cost, comply with all applicable requirements of Municipal, State, and Federal authorities now in force, or which may hereafter be in force, pertaining to this Agreement, and shall faithfully observe in all activities relating to or growing out of this Agreement all Municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes, rules or regulations, ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 4 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Alondra Park\Alondra Park Design.docx and permitting requirements now in force or which may hereafter be in force including, without limitation, obtaining a City of Bakersfield business tax certificate (Bakersfield Municipal Code Chapter 5.02) where required.
9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. This Agreement calls for DESIGN CONSULTANT’s performance of the Scope of Work as an independent consultant. DESIGN CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY for any purpose and is not entitled to any of the benefits provided by CITY to its employees. This Agreement shall not be construed as forming a partnership or any other association with DESIGN CONSULTANT other than that of an independent consultant.
10. DIRECTION. DESIGN CONSULTANT retains the right to control or direct the manner in which the services described herein are performed.
11. EQUIPMENT. DESIGN CONSULTANT will supply all equipment, tools, materials and supplies necessary to perform the services under this Agreement.
12. KEY PERSONNEL. DESIGN CONSULTANT shall name all key personnel to be assigned to perform the Scope of Work. All key personnel shall be properly licensed and experienced for the work to be performed under this Agreement. DESIGN CONSULTANT shall provide background for each of the key personnel including, without limitation, resumes and work experience performing work similar to the Scope of Work. CITY reserves the right to approve key personnel. Once the key personnel are approved, DESIGN CONSULTANT shall not change such personnel without CITY’s written approval.
13. INCLUDED DOCUMENTS. Any bid documents, including, without limitation, special provisions and standard specifications and any Request for Proposals, Request for Qualifications and responses thereto relating to this Agreement are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
14. LICENSES. DESIGN CONSULTANT shall, at DESIGN CONSULTANT’s sole cost and expense, have at the time of bidding or proposal submission and shall keep in full force and effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for DESIGN CONSULTANT to practice its profession in the State of California and perform the Scope of Work. DESIGN CONSULTANT must also ensure that all employees or subconsultants assigned to perform any portion of the Scope of Work are properly licensed. If DESIGN CONSULTANT is a corporation, at least one officer or key employee shall hold the required licenses or professional degrees. If DESIGN CONSULTANT is a partnership, at least one partner shall hold the required licensees or professional degrees. DESIGN CONSULTANT must provide proof that the requirements of this section are ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 5 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Alondra Park\Alondra Park Design.docx met when requested by CITY.
15. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. The Scope of Work shall be performed in conformity with all legal requirements and industry standards observed by a specialist of COSULTANT’s profession in California.
16. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. DESIGN CONSULTANT hereby represents that both corporately and individually the firm and its employees and subconsultants:
16.1 Do not have, and will not have, financial interest in either the success or failure of any project which is dependent upon DESIGN CONSULTANT’s performance of the Scope of Work; and
16.2 Are not currently, and will not be, employed by or under contract to any contractor who may be awarded the contract to construct the Project.
17. SB 854 COMPLIANCE. To the extent Labor Code Section 1771.1 applies to this Agreement, a consultant or subconsultant shall not be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, be subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, as defined in this chapter, unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5.
It is not a violation of Labor Code Section 1771.1 for an unregistered consultant to submit a bid that is authorized by Section 7029.1 of the Business and Professions Code or by Section 10164 or 20103.5 of the Public Contract Code, provided the consultant is registered to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 at the time the contract is awarded. The prime consultant is required to post job site notices in compliance with Title 8 California Code of Regulations Section 16451. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
18. ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. CITY’s acceptance of work or payment for work shall not constitute a waiver of any portion or any provision of this Agreement.
19. NO WAIVER OF DEFAULT. The failure of any party to enforce against another party any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of that party’s right to enforce such a provision at a later time, and shall not serve to vary the terms of this Agreement.
20. INSURANCE.
____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 6 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Alondra Park\Alondra Park Design.docx
20.1 Types and Limits of Insurance. In addition to any other insurance or security required under this Agreement, DESIGN CONSULTANT must procure and maintain, for the duration of this Agreement, the types and limits of insurance below (“Basic Insurance Requirements”).
20.1.1 Professional liability insurance, providing coverage on claims made basis for errors and omissions with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
20.1.2 Automobile liability insurance, providing coverage for owned, non-owned, and hired autos on an occurrence
basis for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage, and personal injury, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
20.1.3 Commercial general liability insurance, unless otherwise approved by CITY’s Risk Manager, providing coverage on
an occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage, and personal
injury, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
The policy must:
20.1.3.1 Provide contractual liability coverage for the terms of this Agreement;
20.1.3.2 Provide products and completed operations
coverage;
20.1.3.3 Provide premises, operations, and mobile
equipment coverage; and
20.1.3.4 Contain an additional insured endorsement in
favor of CITY and its mayor, council, officers,
agents, employees, and designated volunteers.
20.1.4 Workers' compensation insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. In accordance with the
provisions of Labor Code Section 3700, every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1861, DESIGN
CONSULTANT must submit to CITY the following certification before beginning any work on the Improvements:
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the
Labor Code which require every employer to be
____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 7 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Alondra Park\Alondra Park Design.docx insured against liability for worker’s compensation or
to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the
provisions of that code, and I will comply with such
provisions before commencing the performance of
the work of this contract.
By executing this Agreement, DESIGN CONSULTANT is
submitting the certification required above.
The policy must contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY and its mayor, council, officers, agents, employees, and designated volunteers.
20.2 General Provisions Applying to All Insurance Types.
20.2.1 All policies required of DESIGN CONSULTANT must be written on a first-dollar coverage basis, or contain a deductible provision. Subject to CITY’s advance approval, DESIGN
CONSULTANT may utilize a self-insured retention in any or all of the policies provided, but the policy or policies may not contain language, whether added by endorsement or
contained in the policy conditions, that prohibits
satisfaction of any self-insured provision or requirement by anyone other than the named insured or by any means
including other insurance or which is intended to defeat the intent or protection of an additional insured.
20.2.2 Except for professional liability insurance, all policies required of DESIGN CONSULTANT must be primary insurance as to CITY and its mayor, council, officers, agents,
employees, or designated volunteers and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CITY and its mayor, council, officers, agents, employees, and designated volunteers
must be excess of DESIGN CONSULTANT’s insurance and
must not contribute with it.
20.2.3 The insurance required above, except for workers’ compensation insurance, must be placed with insurers with a Best’s rating as approved by CITY’s Risk Manager, but in no event less than A-:VII. Any deductibles, self-insured retentions, or insurance in lesser amounts, or lack of certain types of insurance otherwise required by this Agreement, or insurance rated below Best’s A-:VII, must be declared prior to execution of this Agreement and approved by CITY in
writing.
____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 8 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Alondra Park\Alondra Park Design.docx
20.2.4 The insurance required in this section must be maintained until the Scope of Work is satisfactorily completed as
evidenced by CITY’s written acceptance. All policies must provide that there will be continuing liability thereon, notwithstanding any recovery on any policy.
20.2.5 Full compensation for all premiums which the DESIGN CONSULTANT is required to pay to satisfy the Basic Insurance Requirements shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the performance of the Scope of Work, and no
additional allowance will be made therefore or for
additional premiums which may be required by extensions of the policies of insurance.
20.2.6 It is further understood and agreed by DESIGN CONSULTANT that its liability to CITY will not in any way be limited to or affected by the amount of insurance obtained and carried by DESIGN CONSULTANT in connection with this Agreement.
20.2.7 Unless otherwise approved by CITY, if any part of the Scope of Work is subcontracted, the Basic Insurance Requirements must be provided by, or on behalf of, all subconsultants even if CITY has approved lesser insurance requirements for DESIGN CONSULTANT, and all subconsultants must agree in writing to be bound by the provisions of this section.
21. THIRD PARTY CLAIMS. In the case of public works contracts CITY will timely notify DESIGN CONSULTANT of third party claims relating to this contract.
CITY shall be allowed to recover from DESIGN CONSULTANT and DESIGN CONSULTANT shall pay on demand, all costs of notification.
22. INDEMNITY.
22.1 DESIGN CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CITY and CITY’s officers, agents and employees against any and all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever against them, arising from DESIGN CONSULTANT’s negligence, fraud, willful misconduct, criminal conduct, errors and omissions, or breaches of contract, or any of them, before administrative or judicial tribunals of any kind whatsoever, arising out of, connected with, or caused by DESIGN CONSULTANT or DESIGN CONSULTANT’s employees, agents, independent consultants, companies, or subconsultants in the performance of, or in any way arising from, the terms and provisions of this Agreement whether or not caused in part ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 9 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Alondra Park\Alondra Park Design.docx by a party indemnified hereunder, except for CITY’s sole active negligence or willful misconduct.
22.2 To the extent Civil Code Section 2782.8 is applicable to this Agreement, the DESIGN CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY and CITY’s officers, agents and employees against any and all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands, against them, or any of them, before administrative or judicial tribunals of any kind whatsoever, that only arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of DESIGN CONSULTANT. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the design professional exceed the design professional's proportionate percentage of fault. However, notwithstanding the previous sentence, in the event one or more defendants is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, the design professional shall meet and confer with other parties regarding unpaid defense costs. The duty to indemnify, including the duty and the cost to defend, is limited as provided in this section. This section shall not be waived or modified by contractual agreement, act, or omission of the parties.
23. ASSIGNMENT. Neither this Agreement nor any rights, interests, duties, liabilities, obligations or responsibilities arising out of, concerning or related in any way to this Agreement (including, but not limited to, accounts, actions, causes of action, claims, damages, demands, liabilities, losses, obligations, or reckonings of any kind or nature whatsoever, for compensatory or exemplary and punitive damages, or declaratory, equitable or injunctive relief, whether based on contract, equity, tort or other theories of recovery provided for by the common or statutory law) may be assigned or transferred by any party. Any such assignment is prohibited, and shall be unenforceable and otherwise null and void without the need for further action by the non-assigning party or parties.
24. CONFIDENTIALITY. During the term of this Agreement, DESIGN CONSULTANT may have disclosed to it information of a legal and confidential nature, and such information could severely damage CITY if disclosed to outside parties.
Except as otherwise required by law, when informed that information is confidential, DESIGN CONSULTANT will not disclose to any person, directly or indirectly, either during the term of this Agreement or at any time thereafter, any such information or use such information other than as necessary in the course of this Agreement. All documents DESIGN CONSULTANT prepares and confidential information given to DESIGN CONSULTANT under this Agreement are the exclusive property of CITY.
Under no circumstances shall any such information or documents be removed from CITY without CITY’s prior written consent. ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 10 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Alondra Park\Alondra Park Design.docx
25. ACCOUNTING RECORDS. DESIGN CONSULTANT shall maintain accurate accounting records and other written documentation pertaining to all costs incurred in performance of this Agreement. Such records and documentation shall be kept at DESIGN CONSULTANT’s office during the term of this Agreement, and for a period of three years from the date of the final payment hereunder and made available to CITY representatives upon request at any time during regular business hours.
26. BINDING EFFECT. The rights and obligations of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the parties to the Agreement and their heirs, administrators, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns.
27. CORPORATE AUTHORITY. Each individual signing this Agreement on behalf of entities represents and warrants that they are, respectively, duly authorized to sign on behalf of the entities and to bind the entities fully to each and all of the obligations set forth in this Agreement.
28. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered as an original and be effective as such.
29. EXECUTION. This Agreement is effective upon execution. It is the product of negotiation and all parties are equally responsible for authorship of this Agreement. Section 1654 of the California Civil Code shall not apply to the interpretation of this Agreement.
30. EXHIBITS. In the event of a conflict between the terms, conditions or specifications set forth in this Agreement and those in exhibits attached hereto, the terms, conditions, or specifications set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. All exhibits to which reference is made in this Agreement are deemed incorporated in this Agreement, whether or not actually attached.
31. FURTHER ASSURANCES. Each party shall execute and deliver such papers, documents, and instruments, and perform such acts as are necessary or appropriate, to implement the terms of this Agreement and the intent of the parties to this Agreement.
32. GOVERNING LAW. The laws of the State of California will govern the validity of this Agreement and its interpretation and performance. Any litigation arising in any way from this Agreement shall be brought in Kern County, California.
33. INTERPRETATION. Whenever the context so requires, the masculine gender ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 11 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Alondra Park\Alondra Park Design.docx includes the feminine and neuter, and the singular number includes the plural.
34. MERGER AND MODIFICATION. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all other oral or written representations. This Agreement may be modified only in a writing approved by the City Council and signed by all the parties.
35. NEWS RELEASES/INTERVIEWS. All news releases, media interviews, testimony at hearings and public comments relating to this Agreement by DESIGN CONSULTANT shall be prohibited unless authorized by CITY.
36. NON-INTEREST. No CITY officer or employee shall hold any interest in this Agreement (California Government Code section 1090).
37. NOTICES. All notices relative to this Agreement shall be given in writing and shall be personally served or sent by certified or registered mail and be effective upon actual personal service or depositing in the United States mail. The parties shall be addressed as follows, or at any other address designated by notice:
CITY: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
CITY HALL
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
DESIGN CONSULTANT: QK
5080 California Avenue, Suite 220
Bakersfield, CA 93309
(661) 616-2600
38. RESOURCE ALLOCATION. All CITY obligations under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation and allocation of resources by the City Council.
39. TITLE TO DOCUMENTS. All documents, plans, and drawings, maps, photographs, and other papers, or copies thereof prepared by DESIGN CONSULTANT pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, shall, upon preparation, become CITY property.
40. TAX NUMBERS.
DESIGN CONSULTANT’s Federal Tax ID Number 94-2228472
DESIGN CONSULTANT is a corporation? Yes X No (Please check one.) ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 12 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Alondra Park\Alondra Park Design.docx IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the Effective Date.
“CITY” “DESIGN CONSULTANT”
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD QK
By: By:_________________________________
KAREN GOH, Mayor
Type or Print Name:
Title:
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
RECREATION AND PARKS DEPARMENT
By:_______________________________
DARIN BUDAK
Recreation and Parks Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM: COUNTERSIGNED:
Deputy City Attorney:_______________________ Finance Director: _____________________
VIRIDIANA GALLARDO-KING RANDY MCKEEGAN
Insurance:____________
Attachments: Exhibit A: Request for Proposal
Exhibit B: Scope of Work/Compensation
Ronald J. Wathen, PE #58690
President/CEO
Recreation & Parks Department
1600 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301
661-326-3866 FAX: 661-852-2140
Recreation and Parks Department
DARIN BUDAK, DIRECTOR
March 2, 2026
Re: Request for Scope of Work, Fee Proposal, and Schedule for Alondra Park (Project #26-RP0001) Ms. Cathy Williams
QK, Inc.
5080 California Avenue, Suite 220
Bakersfield, CA 93309
Dear Ms. Williams:
The City of Bakersfield respectfully requests that your firm submit a scope of work, fee proposal, and project schedule for professional design services associated with the above-referenced park development project.
The City is contacting you as a potential consultant from the City’s Library of Consultants, approved by City Council Resolution No. 009-2026 on January 21, 2026. The selected consultant and/or subconsultants must demonstrate design experience in the development of public parks, including but not limited to surveying, site grading and drainage, civil engineering, landscape architecture, irrigation, and electrical design.
The scope of services will include all necessary tasks to design a small neighborhood public park. Services shall include but not be limited to: topographic surveying; environmental and biological services; storm water management services; preparation and review and approval of 30%, 75%, and 100% plans (grading, utility, electrical, landscape, irrigation, etc.), specifications and engineer’s estimate (PS&E); bidding support services; construction technical support; utility services coordination; and community engagement support.
Please itemize your proposal in accordance with the requirements outlined in the City’s Library of Consultants documents and organize your fee proposal under the following phases:
Preliminary Phase (fixed fee)
Design Phase (fixed fee)
Bidding Phase (time and materials, not to exceed)
Construction Phase (time and materials, not to exceed)
The project site consists of approximately 5 gross acres owned by the City, located near the northeast corner of Alondra Drive and Becklow Street. The purpose of this project is to provide park site improvements and greening elements to an undeveloped property designated for small neighborhood public park use.
Based on community engagement feedback, anticipated park elements may include, but are not limited to:
Playground equipment areas for 2-5- and 5–12-year-olds. (PlayCore-Gametime) Fitness equipment area (PlayCore-Gametime)
ADA accessible concrete walkways
Looped stabilized decomposed granite trail
LED security light poles and bollards
Prefabricated restroom building. (Future)
Splash pad play area. (Future)
Sports activity areas i.e. basketball, volleyball, running track, soccer, disk golf, etc.
Individual and large picnic shelter areas
Dog Park (small & large)
Vehicular parking lot
EXHIBIT A
Plant palette to include:
Drought tolerant, low water use trees and shrubs
Trees/shrubs with verifiable environmental benefits such as capture of greenhouse gas and particulate matter.
Trees/shrubs which provide habitat benefits for wildlife Several native plant species
Trees which will provide substantial shade canopy once mature.
The project design phases schedule is as follows:
March 2, 2026 City issues RFP
March 23, 2026 Proposal due
April 8, 2026 City Council awards design contract (tentatively) April 29, 2026 Design Kickoff Meeting/ City issues Notice to Proceed (tentatively) May 1st – Oct. 1st , 2026 (3) Community Engagement Meetings for Design Input Oct 1st, 2026 – April 30,
2027
Design Consultant submits 30%, 75%, & 100% final plans, specification and engineer’s estimate (PS&E) to City for review & approval process through Building Dept.
The proposed project bidding and construction phases schedule are as follows.
June-July 2027 Responsibility Statements & Questionnaires (RSQ) Process. (Establish Final Bidder’s List) August- September 2027 Formal Bidding Process
October-November 2027 Contract Award
December 2027 Pre-Construction Meeting
January 2028 Start of Construction
December 2028 Completion of Construction
The 100% design plans, specifications, and engineer’s estimate are expected to be completed on or before May 1, 2027. Due to funding availability at the time of design phase completion, construction phase may be delayed.
The City requests your firm submit a written fee proposal, itemized scope of work, time schedule, and list of prior similar park projects for this project by Friday, March 23rd, 2026.
If you have any questions concerning this project, please contact Fidel Gonzalez at 661-326-3268 or email at [email protected].
Very truly yours,
Darin Budak
Recreation and Parks Director
By:
Fidel Gonzalez
Park Construction & Facilities Planner
Enclosure:
Site Grant Deeds
cc: Darin Budak, Rajan Mistry, Sara Ortiz, & File
March 23, 2026
Fidel Gonzalez
Park Construction & Facilities Planner
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxton Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
Subject: Proposal for City of Bakersfield - Alondra Park Project (Project #26-RP0001) Dear Mr. Gonzalez:
We are honored and excited that QK has been given the opportunity to present the City of Bakersfield (City) with our proposal for comprehensive design services for the Alondra Park Project (Project). The following represents our overall understanding, approach, and scope of services in response to the Request for Proposal issued for the Project.
QK is a full-service professional design firm that offers a comprehensive suite of services under one roof. Our proposal includes a full complement of associated services and will be led by our recently expanded landscape architecture practice group, all working seamlessly to provide the City with the cohesive, efficient, and constructible park designs that align with the City’s vision and community priorities.
With a strong track record of delivering successful public projects and a commitment to quality, coordination, and responsiveness, QK will deliver a thoughtfully planned and well-executed park that serves the Bakersfield community for generations. Our familiarity with City processes and expectations supports a streamlined project aligned with schedule, budget, and stakeholder goals. We welcome any questions or clarifications you may have regarding our proposal and are extremely excited about this opportunity to partner again with the City to deliver another lasting, recreational amenity to the Bakersfield community.
APPROACH
QK will provide community engagement services and coordinate in concert with the City to develop a communityfocused neighborhood park based on residents’ feedback. As outlined in more detail in Tasks 1.3 and 1.4, we will design several Concept Plan park alternatives for review by the City staff and residents. Once changes are discussed and a Concept Plan alternative has been selected, QK will move into the design phase, preparing documents required to construct the park improvements.
Based on community engagement feedback, site constraints, and budget considerations, anticipated park elements may include, but are not limited to:
• Playground equipment areas for two–to five-year-olds and five–to 12-year-olds (PlayCore-Gametime). • Fitness equipment area (PlayCore-Gametime).
• ADA accessible concrete walkways.
• Looped stabilized decomposed granite trail.
• LED security light poles and bollards.
• Prefabricated restroom building (Future).
• Splash pad play area (Future).
• Sports activity areas, i.e., basketball, volleyball, running track, soccer, disc golf, etc. • Individual and large picnic shelter areas.
• Dog Park for small and large dogs.
• Vehicular parking lot.
EXHIBIT B
City of Bakersfield Page 2 of 11
March 23, 2026
The following includes our Scope of Services, Project Schedule, and Fee Estimate in accordance with City requirements for your review and consideration.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
PHASE 1.0 PRELIMINARY PHASE
This phase establishes the technical, community, and regulatory foundation to advance the project into the design phase.
TASK 1.1 PROJECT COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT
QK will provide overall Project management for the Project, coordinating with the City to provide timely communication and organization. The Project management responsibilities include the following:
• Perform administration of the Project.
• Prepare and adhere to the master Project schedule.
• Direct and coordinate overall team efforts.
• Coordinate and conduct Project meetings with the City staff as noted in the tasks below. • Respond to City staff questions and correspondence.
• Oversee all work items identified in the Scope of Services. • Perform Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) measures, establishing that the design is in conformance with applicable standards and policies and with QK’s established QA/QC program. • Coordinate review submittals and approvals with the City. • Prepare and submit Project invoices monthly.
Deliverables:
• Master Project schedule in PDF format
• Response(s) to City staff questions/correspondence, electronic format • Project invoices (monthly), hard copy
TASK 1.2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
QK will perform a field survey for the subject property, providing necessary base files to the design team. This survey will be referenced to the City control stations for both horizontal and vertical values. Our scope of services will consist of the following elements:
• Spot elevations to determine contours.
• Street grades to the centerline, including the flowline back of the walk and the pavement. • Above-ground features, including fences, power poles, signs, and visible above-ground utilities within the outlined area.
• Existing trees, noting diameter at breast height and the drip line for trees that have a canopy within the specified area of the survey.
• Post-process field data and analyze the accuracy and completeness of data. • Import topographic data into AutoCAD and reduce it to a readable, uniform scale CAD drawing. • Create a surface to show contours.
• QA/QC review of files by a professional land surveyor.
Deliverable:
• Topographic survey including points, planimetric data, and surface information in AutoCAD Civil 3D 2026 format to be used in project concept and design
City of Bakersfield Page 3 of 11
March 23, 2026
Exclusions and Assumptions:
• Subsurface utility verification is excluded from this scope.
TASK 1.3 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
QK will conduct community engagement activities for the Project in partnership with the City. Three (3) public meetings are proposed to encourage local residents to offer suggestions and assist the City in determining the amenities to be included in the park. The public outreach meetings will take place in a location and at a time determined by the City. QK will prepare and provide large-scale Concept Plans (see Task 1.4), printed materials, and exhibit boards to provide visuals for the public to review and comment. Participants can view the boards at their leisure, and QK staff will be on hand to present and discuss the contents of the Project.
As part of this task, QK staff will coordinate with park users and the City to identify and prioritize the appropriate facilities and amenities of the Project. Initial site design concept alternatives plans will be proposed and evolve from site conditions, and the design program parameters established for the Project. A proper balance between community desires, potential budget parameters, and phasing requirements will be incorporated into the planning process.
Strong considerations will be given to activity/use relationships that balance the variety of park users with the City’s parameters, focusing on the physical site characteristics, adjacent land uses, facility standards, maintenance operations, and budget/phasing requirements.
The Final Park Concept Plan will incorporate the draft concept elements into a final product that best responds to site conditions, meets the recreation needs and desires of the community, and fosters public support to achieve the overall success of the Project.
Deliverables:
• Exhibit boards with various components of the prepared renderings in PDF format and hard copy • PowerPoint presentation in PPT and PDF formats
• Attendee Check-in station to track attendance at each meeting • Notes from the community meetings in PDF format
• Survey Monkey setup and results in electronic format
Exclusions and Assumptions:
• Translation services at public meetings are excluded. • Childcare services at public meetings are excluded.
• We assume the City will provide power, a microphone, tables, chairs, and a screen for presentations at public meetings.
TASK 1.4 PARK DESIGN CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES AND FINAL CONCEPT PLAN As noted in Task 1.3 Community Engagement, QK will develop three (3) Concept Plan options. We anticipate up to three (3) check-in meetings with the City staff to review park concept development. Once a preferred concept is selected and approved, QK will prepare one (1) Final Park Concept Plan showing the layout of the approved park amenities. QK will meet with the City staff to review and make modifications before moving into the construction drawings. During this task, QK will confirm the City’s design and construction criteria. 3D models and photo-realistic perspective renderings will be generated based on the Concept Plan to help the community visualize the vision of the Alondra Park site.
Deliverables:
• Notes from the meetings with City staff in PDF format • Three (3) Concept Plan options in PDF format
• One (1) updated Conceptual Design Master Plan in PDF format • One (1) preliminary cost estimate based on the Final Park Concept Plan in PDF format • Three (3) photo-realistic perspective renderings in PDF format City of Bakersfield Page 4 of 11
March 23, 2026
TASK 1.5 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Under contract with QK, Soils Engineering, Inc. (SEI), will conduct a geotechnical investigation of the Project site. SEI’s investigation will include:
• Three (3) borings to a depth of 15 feet or refusal, whichever comes first. • One (1) bulk sample will be taken from the borings for pavement design information. • Undisturbed and bulk soil samples of representative subsurface soils will be obtained at five (5)-foot intervals. • Field exploration.
• Laboratory testing.
• Engineering analysis.
• Report preparation will include criteria and recommendations in the following areas:
o Earthwork.
o Foundations.
o Pavement Design recommendations based on R-values.
Deliverable:
• Geotechnical Report in PDF format
PHASE 2.0 DESIGN PHASE
This phase advances the approved concept into design documents preparation for bidding and construction.
TASK 2.1 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT – 30% SUBMITTAL
QK will prepare design development documents based on the approved Final Concept Plan and refinements to park features. The design development documents and outline specifications will be prepared to a 30% design level and provided to City staff to review and comment on the Project’s design components, materials, products, and detailing prior to the preparation of detailed construction documents. A supplemental product submittal booklet shall include product manufacturer catalog cut sheets for proposed site furnishings, materials, and irrigation equipment. QK will provide an opinion of probable costs (OPIC) based on the design development documents. The 30% submittal represents a critical milestone for alignment regarding design direction, materials, and budget prior to advancing to detailed construction documents.
The plans are envisioned to include the following:
• Title Sheet and General Notes
• Topographic Survey
• Demolition Plans
• Grading and Utility Plans
• Site Layout and Amenity Reference Plan with Enlargement Plans as necessary • Landscape and Irrigation Plans
• Lighting and Electrical Plans (see Task 2.4)
We will contact the existing utility companies to request utility plat maps showing locations of existing infrastructure for the purpose of locating facilities, coordinating potential relocations, and aiding in the preliminary design phase of the project.
Deliverables:
• One (1) 30% design development submittal document in PDF format • One (1) preliminary OPIC in PDF format
• One (1) supplemental product submittal booklet in PDF format City of Bakersfield Page 5 of 11
March 23, 2026
TASK 2.2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (PS&E) - 75% & 100% SUBMITTAL QK will prepare Construction Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) for City approval and bidding. Based on the approved 30% design development documents and construction budget, QK will prepare complete construction documents as applicable in accordance with the local and State codes, standards, and specifications. QK will confirm the requirements for specifications and bid schedules with the City staff. QK will provide the construction documents to the City for review at the 75% and 100% stages. Subsequent submittals will address comments from the previous submittal, and the previous markup will be provided. QK assumes that the City will prepare the bid document package, and QK will provide technical specifications and an OPIC. Scope and anticipated deliverables from associated disciplines are noted in the task items below.
The plans will include the following:
• Title Sheet and General Notes
• Topographic Survey
• Demolition Plans
• Grading and Utility Plans
• Site Layout and Amenity Reference Plans
• Landscape Planting and Irrigation Plans
• Construction and Landscape Details, including structural-related drawings and calculations • Lighting and Electrical Plans (see Task 2.4)
Deliverables:
• One (1) 24”x36” PDF set of the 75% complete PS&E documents for the City’s review and comment • One (1) PDF set of City plan check comments received from 30% submittal • One (1) meeting to review and discuss the 75% PS&E submittal • One (1) 24”x36” PDF set of the 100% complete final PS&E documents • One (1) original stamped and signed set of the PS&E documents for reproduction by the City • One (1) PDF set of City plan check comments received from 75% submittal Exclusions and Assumptions:
• Progress and schedule between submittal stages are dependent on timely review and consolidated feedback.
TASK 2.3 CASP REVIEW
QK’s Certified Access Specialist (CASp) will provide two (2) CASp reviews of the Project civil plans for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements under the California Building Code (CBC). QK will coordinate reviews with the City and provide comments. QK will provide a letter from the CASp reviewer upon completion.
Deliverable:
• One (1) CASp Review Letter in PDF format
TASK 2.4 ELECTRICAL AND LIGHTING PLANS
Under contract with QK, Rose, Sing, Eastham & Associates (RSE) will provide electrical design documents to support the construction of the Project in accordance with the City standards. Two (2) site visits are included in this scope of services. RSE’s scope of services includes:
• Site Electrical Plan
• Site and Parking Lot Lighting Plan
• Line Diagrams, Schedules, and Details
• Energy Compliance Documents (Title 24)
City of Bakersfield Page 6 of 11
March 23, 2026
• 30%, 75%, and 100% Design Packages
• Calculations
• Working Drawings
• Specifications
• Submittal Review
Deliverables:
• Energy Compliance Documents (Title 24) in PDF format
• One (1) 30% design package for City review and comment (included as part of Task 2.1 submittal) in PDF format.
• One (1) 24”x36” PDF set of the 75% complete PS&E documents for City review and comment (included as part of Task 2.2 deliverable)
• One (1) 24”x36” PDF set of the 100% complete final PS&E documents (included as part of Task 2.2 deliverable)
• One (1) original signed set of PS&E documents for reproduction by the City (included as part of Task 2.2 deliverable)
TASK 2.5 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
Under contract with QK, Cornerstone Structural Engineering Group (CSEG) will provide structural design services to provide structural calculations, plans, and book specifications in CSI format for the construction of the structural elements of the Project. The plans and calculations will be designed according to the force level provisions in the 2025 California Building Code. The structural sheets will include structural notes, typical details, structural details, and elevations. CSEG’s scope of services includes:
• Review the geotechnical engineering report and technical data sheets provided by others for criteria pertaining to the design of anchorage bolts and foundations for the park site improvements. • Prepare structural drawings depicting sections and details of the park site improvement anchorage bolts and foundations. Anticipated sheets include:
o S0.01 Project Data & Specifications
o S2.01 Foundation Plans
o S4.01 Foundation Details
o S4.02 Foundation Details
• Prepare supporting structural calculations for the park site improvement anchorage bolts and foundations. • Prepare structural technical specifications in CSI format related to the park site improvement anchorage bolts and foundations, including both sheet specs and book specs. • Respond to plan check comments from the 30%, 75%, and 100% submittals, including written responses to City Building Department comments.
• Submit electronic (PDF) copies of the structural drawings, calculations, and technical specifications sealed and signed by a licensed Structural Engineer.
Deliverable:
• One (1) 30% structural design documents and calculations for City review and comment (included as part of Task 2.1 submittal) in PDF format.
• One (1) 24”x36” PDF set of the 75% structural drawings, calculations, and technical specifications documents for City review and comment (included as part of Task 2.2 deliverable) • One (1) 24”x36” PDF set of the 100% complete final structural drawings, calculations, and technical specifications (included as part of Task 2.2 deliverable) • One (1) original signed set of structural drawings, calculations, and technical specifications documents by a licensed Structural Engineer (included as part of Task 2.2 deliverable) City of Bakersfield Page 7 of 11
March 23, 2026
TASK 2.6 STORMWATER POLLUTION AND PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) QK will provide engineering services and coordination with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to obtain coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit, Water Quality Order #2009-0009-DWQ, as amended by Order #2010-0014-DWQ, #2012-006-DWQ, and WQ2022-0057-DWQ for the proposed construction Project. The environmental services include the following:
• Prepare Notice of Intent (NOI) and all required Permit Registration Documents (PRDs), including, but not limited to, the Risk Assessment and Post-Construction Water Balance as required by the State, for the owner/Legally Responsible Person (LRP).
• Assist the LRP in electronically filing the NOI and PRDs online using the State's Stormwater Multi-Application & Reporting System (SMARTS).
• Prepare a SWPPP outlining Best Management Practice (BMP) site recommendations for both pre- and postconstruction activities. • Provide one (1) SWPPP Manual to be referenced and maintained on site by the contractor during construction.
Deliverable:
• One (1) hard copy of completed SWPPP
The above-described SWPPP preparation services will be provided for a fixed fee as shown in the Fee Estimate section. This fee excludes any additional filing fees associated with the SWPPP required by the SWRCB. This fee also assumes that the Project description and control measures will not be revised after submittal of the SWPPP to the SWRCB. Any additional revisions to the SWPPP would be on a Time-and-Materials (T&M) basis. Any additional work outside of this scope will be prepared under separate authorization.
PHASE 3.0 BIDDING PHASE
This phase advances the approved design documents to bidding and construction.
TASK 3.1 BIDDING SUPPORT SERVICES
QK will prepare the Project-specific bid documents, technical specifications, and information described in Task 2.2 above for the City’s preparation of the final Project manual. The City will compile the final Project manual utilizing the specification and related bid documents from QK. The City will include the most current edition of the City’s “front end” documents, including, but not limited to, Notice to Contractors, Information for Bidders, bidding documents, General Provisions, agreement, etc., for the City’s use in advertising the Project.
Services include support for the City’s intended two-part bidding strategy: prequalification of bidders through a Responsibility Statements and Questionnaires (RSQs) process, followed by a formal bidding process by prequalified contractors.
QK will assist the City in evaluating RSQs from interested responsive bidders to determine a qualified bidders list for formal bidding. Assistance may include administration, evaluation, and recommendation. We have budgeted 24 hours for this task. If the City requests further assistance, QK can provide additional services on a T&M basis as may be requested.
QK will provide formal bidding process support through the fielding of bidder requests for information (Bid RFIs) and support the City’s production and distribution of bid documents and addenda throughout the course of the bid process. QK will host the bid documents on our plan room website. QK will attend the City’s pre-bid bidders’ conference at the City’s office and on-site, with design professionals responding to bidders’ questions as appropriate.
QK will evaluate the lowest three (3) responsive bids and provide recommendations to the City for contract award.
City of Bakersfield Page 8 of 11
March 23, 2026
RSE and CSEG will assist QK and the City as requested during bidding. Services to be provided may include answering questions, providing consultation and interpretation of the construction documents, assisting in preparation of addenda to the PS&E during the advertisement period, and assisting in the evaluation of the bids received. Attendance at pre-bid meetings or bid opening can be provided if requested.
Deliverables:
• One (1) complete PDF set of the Bid Document Package
• Administrative support and/or evaluation and recommendations as directed by the City • Up to 15 Bid RFI responses via email
• Up to five (5) Bid addenda in PDF format
• Bid evaluation and recommendation in PDF format
PHASE 4.0 CONSTRUCTION PHASE
We understand the City is seeking funds for the construction phase of the project. QK requests the opportunity to revisit the scope of services and fee estimate for this phase prior to commencement of work.
TASK 4.1 CONSTRUCTION TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Upon successful completion of contract formation, QK will support the City during the pre-construction meeting by developing an agenda for and attending the pre-construction meeting with the contractor, City, and other parties.
QK will attend regular City-led progress meetings by electronic meeting software (Microsoft Teams or other) for up to 26 meetings.
QK will implement Project management controls using Procore management software and provide access to the City and contractor staff. QK will respond to RFIs and provide submittal reviews. RSE and CSEG will support QK and the City during construction by reviewing necessary contractor submittals and answering questions and/or RFIs. For budget purposes, we have budgeted 20 RFI responses and 25 submittal and resubmittal reviews.
QK will provide design support during construction to address emergent issues affecting design changes or field conditions. For budgeting purposes, we have budgeted 60 hours of staff design time.
QK will provide an on-site review of construction progress by our design staff. We are budgeting for four (4) progress visits during construction.
QK will visit the site upon completion to evaluate the contractor’s work. We will identify items requiring remediation for inclusion in the master Project punch list.
Deliverables:
• RFI and submittal logs as requested in PDF format
• Up to 20 RFI responses in PDF format
• Up to 25 Submittal responses in PDF format
• Change documentation in PDF format
Based on our recent conversation on March 17, 2026, QK recommends the following tasks be completed to establish environmental compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and State and federal environmental regulations.
TASK 4.2 CEQA NOTICE OF EXEMPTION (NOE)
Based on our understanding, we anticipate that a 15301 (c) Existing Facilities Class 1 exemption would be appropriate for the project. An NOE will be prepared and will include technical memos to substantiate that the determination is the sufficient level of effort needed to comply with CEQA.
City of Bakersfield Page 9 of 11
March 23, 2026
QK will draft the NOE and submit it to the City for review. We assume that the City staff will post the NOE with the State Clearinghouse (SCH) online portal and the Kern County Clerk. This fee does not include the $50 fee to post with the Kern County Clerk. If the City requests our assistance, QK can help post the CEQA document on the SCH online portal. We assume one (1) round of comments.
If the City receives any comments regarding the use of this exemption, a full environmental review may be necessary.
At that time, QK can provide a contract amendment with a scope of services and the cost to complete that work.
Deliverable:
• NOE in PDF format
TASK 4.3 PRE-CONSTRUCTION CLEARANCE SURVEY
QK will conduct a pre-construction clearance survey of the proposed Project site and the 50-foot buffer area (where feasible) to document existing site conditions. Based on the location of the Project site, the survey will focus on the identification of San Joaquin kit fox, western burrowing owl, and other special-status species with the potential to occur on the proposed Project site. The survey will confirm habitat, other wildlife, etc., that may be on the Project site.
After the pre-construction clearance survey is completed, QK will prepare and submit a memo that identifies any biological resources identified during the survey. The memo will be submitted to the City within one (1) day of the survey.
Deliverable:
• A memo report in PDF format
TASK 4.4 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES TRAINING
A qualified, approved QK biologist will provide one (1), one (1)-hour San Joaquin kit fox and Bird Protection training for the contractor, subcontractor, and the contractor's representatives at the Project site. This training will include a discussion of the rules, regulations, and conditions of the California and Federal Endangered Species Acts as they pertain specifically to the San Joaquin kit fox and those special provisions under Section 14-6.03 “Bird Protection” of the Standard Specifications. The biologist will discuss the potential for the San Joaquin kit fox to occur on-site and the legal consequences of non-compliance. A hard copy of the training will be provided to the construction crew along with additional sign-in sheets.
Deliverables:
• A hard copy of the training
• A scanned copy of the sign-in attendance sheet in PDF format will be emailed
SCHEDULE
Phase/Task Description Duration
Phase 1.0 Preliminary Phase
Task 1.1 Project Coordination and Management Ongoing
Task 1.2 Topographic Survey 30 days
Task 1.3 Community Engagement 5 months*
Task 1.4 Park Design Concept Alternatives and Final Concept Plan 5 months* Task 1.5 Geotechnical Investigation 30 days*
Phase 2.0 Design Phase
Task 2.1 Design Development – 30% Submittal 1 month
Task 2.2 Construction Documents (PS&E) -75% and 100% Submittal 6 months Task 2.3 CASp Review 2 days
Task 2.4 Electrical and Lighting Plans 3 months*
City of Bakersfield Page 10 of 11
March 23, 2026
Phase/Task Description Duration
Task 2.5 Structural Engineering Services 3 months*
Task 2.6 Stormwater Pollution and Prevention Plan (SWPPP) 5 days Phase 3.0 Bidding Phase
Task 3.1 Bidding Support Services 120 days
Phase 4.0 Construction Phase
Task 4.1 Construction Technical Support 365 days
Task 4.2 CEQA Notice of Exemption (NOE) 1 day
Task 4.3 Pre-construction Clearance Survey 2 days
Task 4.4 Threatened and Endangered Species Training 1 day Total Duration 28 months
FEE ESTIMATE
The tasks listed in the scope of services above will be billed on either a T&M, Not to Exceed (NTE) or Fixed Fee (FF) basis, per the proposal request from the City, and as shown in the following table.
Phase /Task Description Fee Type Fee Amount
Phase 1.0 Preliminary Phase
Task 1.1 Project Coordination and Management FF $30,500 Task 1.2 Topographic Survey FF $24,200
Task 1.3 Community Engagement FF $34,800
Task 1.4 Park Design Concept Alternatives and Final Concept Plan FF $32,300 Task 1.5 Geotechnical Investigation FF $7,940
Phase 2.0 Design Phase
Task 2.1 Design Development – 30% Submittal FF $28,500
Task 2.2 Construction Documents (PS&E) -75% and 100% Submittal FF $99,000 Task 2.3 CASp Review FF $1,200
Task 2.4 Electrical and Lighting Plans FF $16,100
Task 2.5 Structural Engineering Services FF $11,500
Task 2.6 Stormwater Pollution and Prevention Plan (SWPPP) FF $6,100 Phase 3.0 Bidding Phase
Task 3.1 Bidding Support Services T&M, NTE $22,300
Phase 4.0 Construction Phase
Task 4.1 Construction Technical Support T&M, NTE $56,200 Task 4.2 CEQA Notice of Exemption (NOE) T&M, NTE $1,500 Task 4.3 Preconstruction Clearance Survey T&M, NTE $2,500 Task 4.4 Threatened and Endangered Species Training T&M, NTE $900 Total Estimated Fee $375,540
Notes:
1. Expenses for reproduction, mailing, mileage, etc., are billed separately per our attached Charge Rate Schedule.
2. Fees are based on the scope and assumptions outlined. Changes in scope, schedule, or regulatory requirements may require additional services.
3. All time-and-materials fees will be invoiced monthly based on the level of effort in terms of hours relative to our Charge Rate Schedule.
4. When a Task is set on a time-and-materials fee basis, it signifies that it is not possible to accurately predict the amount of work effort required, typical of on-call type services. QK will work with the client to set expectations where applicable.
5. Tasks billed by fixed fees will be invoiced monthly based on the percentage of work completed.
6. Additional Services requested in writing and approved by the client will be provided on a time-and-materials basis.
7. The Fee Estimate is good for a period of 90 days from the date of the proposal. After 90 days, the Fee Estimate is subject to change.
8. Fees for field surveying activities are subject to the payment of Prevailing Wages for Kern County.
City of Bakersfield Page 11 of 11
March 23, 2026
EXCLUSIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS
• Any service not specifically identified herein is excluded from this proposal. • Unforeseen site conditions, such as subsurface conditions, hazardous materials, or undocumented utilities, are excluded.
• Discovery or removal procedures for hazardous waste, wells, underground tanks, or archaeological artifacts. • Off-site or street improvement plans are excluded.
• Sports field lighting design/plans are excluded.
• Permit, plan checking, inspection, and other agencies' fees, including utility services/connection and application fees, are excluded.
• Coordination with agencies beyond those specified in this proposal is excluded. • Any/all environmental documents (Environmental Impact Report, Negative Declaration Statement, etc.) are excluded.
• Tree Survey and/or Arborist services are excluded.
• SWPPP monitoring by a Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) and Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) is excluded.
• We understand the City is seeking funds for the construction phase of the project. QK requests the opportunity to revisit the scope of services and fee estimate for this phase prior to commencement of work. • Full-time Construction Administration/Observation including daily construction inspection services are excluded. Our scope assumes construction administration as needed by the City. • All compaction and material testing (i.e., concrete cylinder testing, etc.) and special inspections during construction are excluded
• Irrigation auditing services are excluded.
• Any required preliminary title reports and/or underlying documents will be provided by the City. • Record of Survey, corner records, re-establishment of property corners, construction staking, and related land surveying services not specifically included in the scope of services proposed herein are not included in this proposal.
• We assume that the City staff will post the NOE with the SCH online portal and the Kern County Clerk. The fee for Task 4.2 does not include the $50 fee to post with the Kern County Clerk. If the City requests our assistance, QK can help post the CEQA document on the SCH online portal.
AUTHORIZATION OF SERVICES
To authorize the services described herein, please send us an Agreement. Typically, we can begin our services within five (5) business days of the time authorization is received, depending on the client’s needs and schedule constraints.
Thank you for the opportunity to propose on this Project. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this proposal further, please contact Cathy Williams at (661) 616-2600. We look forward to collaborating with you on this important Project.
Sincerely,
Cathy Williams, PE, QSD/QSD, ENV SP Amber Aguayo
Branch Manager - Bakersfield CFO/COO
Enclosures: Charge Rate Schedule
Project Team Resumes & Experience
P260157
MG/JM/GH/BW/GT/CW/AA
Charge Rate Schedule
CATHY WILLIAMS
PE, QSD | QSP, ENV SP
Principal-in-Charge
GREG HAUSER PLA, ASLA
Project Manager
JOHN McGEE
LLA, CLARB
Senior Landscape
Architect
REBEKAH GODETT
PE
Lead Engineer
BRANDON WALKER
PLS
Lead Land Surveyor
GREG THOMPSON
PE, QSD | QSP, CASp
Construction Support
Lead
PROJECT TEAM RESUMES & EXPERIENCE
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
PROPOSAL FOR ALONDRA PARK (Project #26-RP0001)
Engineering | Land Surveying | Planning | Environmental | Landscape Architecture | Construction Management qkinc.com 2 CATHY WILLIAMS, PE, QSD | QSP, ENV SP
Role: Principal-in-Charge
EXPERIENCE
QK Tenure
Industry Tenure
16 years
29 years
LICENSES
Professional Engineer - Civil
California - No. 75489
CERTIFICATIONS
Qualified SWPPP Developer
Qualified SWPPP Practitioner
California Stormwater Quality
Association, No. 22393
Envision Sustainability Professional
Institute for Sustainable
Infrastructure
EDUCATION
B.S. Civil Engineering
San Diego State University
AFFILIATIONS
American Council of Engineering
Companies
American Society of Civil Engineers
Greater Bakersfield Chamber of
Commerce
Home Builders Association
Cathy steps into the Principal-in-Charge role with a civil engineering career spanning both public agency work and complex private development, bringing a rare dual fluency: the technical depth to understand every discipline on the team and the institutional knowledge to navigate the regulatory and municipal landscape of the City of Bakersfield.
Her background in grading, drainage, water quality, and utility design means she engages with the Alondra Park scope not just as an executive overseer but as a technical peer to the engineers delivering it. As QK’s Director of Land Development and Education Markets, Cathy has steered multidisciplinary teams through high-stakes, multi-phase projects where quality, schedule, and budget are non-negotiable, exactly the standard this Project demands.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Kovacevich Park – Field of Dreams
Principal-in-Charge
City of Arvin | Arvin, CA
H Street Improvements (SR 58-SR 204)
Principal-in-Charge | Project Manager
City of Bakersfield | Bakersfield, CA
Belle Terrace Park Improvements
Project Manager
County of Kern | Bakersfield, CA
North Shafter Community Park Development
Project Manager
Wynn Smith Landscape Architects, Inc. | Shafter, CA
Riverstone Town Center
Principal-in-Charge | Project Manager
Lennar | Madera, CA
Bakersfield College Agriculture Building
Principal Engineer
TETER, Inc. | Bakersfield, CA
CSU Bakersfield Energy Innovation Building
Principal-in-Charge | Project Manager
AC Martin | Bakersfield, CA
3 GREG HAUSER, PLA, ASLA
Role: Project Manager
EXPERIENCE
QK Tenure
Industry Tenure
19 years
39 years
LICENSES
Professional Landscape Architect
American Society of Landscape
Architects - No. 3757
EDUCATION
B.S. Landscape Architecture
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo
AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Landscape
Architects
California Parks + Recreation Society
Landscape Architecture Department
Advisory Council, CalPoly SLO
RELEVANT EXPERTISE
Parks and Recreation Design +
Master Planning
Streetscape + Median Improvements
Residential Community Landscape
Design
Educational Facility Landscape
Design
Community Facilitation + Public
Engagement
As Project Manager for Alondra Park, Greg brings the full weight of his landscape architecture expertise to leading a multidisciplinary team through every phase of this Project. Greg coordinates across civil engineering, land surveying, construction support, and specialty subconsultants in electrical, geotechnical, and structural disciplines, providing the integrated oversight a large neighborhood park of this complexity demands.
His deep background in parks and recreation design, community facilitation, and public engagement positions him to guide the City’s three community input meetings and translate resident feedback into a design that serves Bakersfield’s full range of users. With proven experience managing projects from programming and master planning through PS&E and construction administration, Greg brings the continuity of leadership and budget discipline this Project requires from kickoff through completion.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Fruitridge Community Park
Project Manager
Southgate Recreation + Park District | Fruitridge, CA
Heron Landing Community Park
Project Manager
City of Rancho Cordova | Rancho Cordova, CA
Grandpark Specific Plan Preliminary Landscape Design
Project Manager
City of Sacramento | Sacramento, CA
Nicholas Park
Project Manager
City of Sacramento | Sacramento, CA
Sacramento Northern Bike Trail Enhancements
Project Manager
City of Sacramento | Sacramento, CA
Rio Del Oro Master Planned Community
Project Manager
Elliott Homes | Rancho Cordova, CA
The Parkway
Project Manager
Sacramento County | Sacramento, CA
Natomas Park
Project Manager
Sacramento County | Sacramento, CA
4 JOHN MCGEE, LLA, PLA, CLARB
Role: Senior Landscape Architect
EXPERIENCE
QK Tenure
Industry Tenure
5 years
31 years
LICENSES
Licensed Landscape Architect
California - No. 4454
Missouri - No. 2025011285
CERTIFICATIONS
Council of Landscape Architectural
Registration Board
No. 5915
EDUCATION
B.S. Landscape Architecture
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Landscape
Architects
RELEVANT EXPERTISE
Parks + Recreation Design
Sports Complex, Athletic Facility, and
Pickleball Court Landscape Design
Park Master Planning
Irrigation Rehabilitation + Design
Community + Stakeholder
Engagement
John brings a design sensibility that balances aesthetic vision with the practical realities of municipal park delivery. His portfolio spanning parks and recreation, urban infill, and downtown revitalization reflects the breadth of experience needed to thoughtfully program a neighborhood park like Alondra for the full range of users Bakersfield envisions.
John’s collaborative, stakeholder-centered approach is a natural fit for a project with three community engagement meetings built into the schedule. He finds his greatest satisfaction in creating spaces that serve real community needs, and brings particular passion to projects, like this one, that invest directly in the quality of life for underserved communities.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Kovacevich Park – Field of Dreams
Senior Landscape Architect
City of Arvin | Arvin, CA
MLK Park Extension Design
Senior Landscape Architect
City of Delano | Delano, CA
Exeter Parks + Recreation Master Plan
Senior Landscape Architect
City of Exeter | Exeter, CA
Porterville Sports Complex Baseball Field
Senior Landscape Architect
City of Porterville | Porterville, CA
Bakersfield College Agriculture Building
Senior Landscape Architect
TETER, Inc. | Bakersfield, CA
CSU Bakersfield Energy Innovation Building
Senior Landscape Architect
AC Martin | Bakersfield, CA
Skypark Tot Lot Replacement
Lead Landscape Architect
City of Scotts Valley | Scotts Valley, CA
City of Selma Parks Master Plan
Senior Landscape Architect
City of Selma | Selma, CA
Rotary East Park Pickleball Court
Senior Landscape Architect
City of Fresno | Fresno, CA
5 REBEKAH GODETT, PE
Role: Lead Engineer
EXPERIENCE
QK Tenure
Industry Tenure
21 years
21 years
LICENSES
Professional Engineer - Civil
California - No. 82845
EDUCATION
B.S. Civil Engineering
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo
AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineers
Society of Hispanic Professional
Engineers
RELEVANT EXPERTISE
Site Grading + Drainage Design
Stormwater Management
Construction Documents + PS&E
Public Works Infrastructure
AutoCAD Production Management
Engineering a 12-acre neighborhood park from the ground up demands someone who can move fluidly across disciplines, and Rebekah is exactly that engineer.
Her expertise spanning roadway design, water systems, sewer networks, and storm drainage gives her an instinctive command of the utility coordination, site grading, and stormwater management challenges that will define the Alondra design process.
As Lead Engineer, Rebekah brings not just technical depth but an exacting precision to construction documentation that shows up in every plan set she produces. Her role as one of QK’s AutoCAD group leaders means the PS&E deliverables for this Project benefit from a quality standard she sets and enforces across the team. Sharp, collaborative, and deeply invested in getting the details right, Rebekah is the technical backbone of QK’s delivery on this Project.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Kovacevich Park – Field of Dreams
Senior Engineer
City of Arvin | Arvin, CA
MLK Park Extension Design
Senior Engineer
City of Delano | Delano, CA
Belle Terrace Park Improvements
Senior Engineer
County of Kern | Bakersfield, CA
North Shafter Community Park Development
Senior Engineer
Wynn Smith Landscape Architects, Inc. | Shafter, CA
Bakersfield College Agriculture Building
Senior Engineer
TETER, Inc. | Bakersfield, CA
CSU Bakersfield Energy Innovation Building
Senior Engineer
AC Martin | Bakersfield, CA
Farmersville SR 198 Gateway Beautification Project
Senior Engineer
City of Farmersville | Farmersville, CA
Riverstone Town Center
Senior Engineer
Lennar | Madera, CA
H Street Improvements (SR 58-SR 204)
Senior Engineer
City of Bakersfield | Bakersfield, CA
6 BRANDON WALKER, PLS
Role: Lead Land Surveyor
EXPERIENCE
QK Tenure
Industry Tenure
22 years
41 years
LICENSES
Professional Land Surveyor
California - No. 8832
EDUCATION
B.A. Business Administration &
Management
University of Phoenix
AFFILIATIONS
California Land Surveyors Association,
Bakersfield Chapter
RELEVANT EXPERTISE
Boundary Surveys
Topographic Surveys
Construction Surveys
ALTA Surveys
Lot Line Adjustments
Parcel Map Waivers
Legal Descriptions
Construction Staking + Calculations
Topographic surveying is one of the first and most foundational tasks on the Alondra Project, and Brandon brings exactly the field-rooted expertise that sets a survey up for success. With extensive experience across topographic, boundary, and control surveys, he delivers the precise base data that every downstream design decision, from grading to utility layout to site programming, depends on.
Brandon’s construction staking background adds particular value on a project that runs through a full construction phase. He understands what contractors need in the field and works proactively to anticipate challenges before they surface, a practical advantage on a public project with a firm completion schedule and community visibility.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Belle Terrace Park Improvements
Senior Land Surveyor
County of Kern | Bakersfield, CA
North Shafter Community Park Development
Senior Land Surveyor
Wynn Smith Landscape Architects, Inc. | Shafter, CA
Bakersfield College Agriculture Building
Senior Land Surveyor
TETER, Inc. | Bakersfield, CA
Porterville Sports Complex Baseball Field
Senior Land Surveyor
City of Porterville | Porterville, CA
H Street Improvements (SR 58-SR 204)
Senior Land Surveyor
City of Bakersfield | Bakersfield, CA
Bakersfield College Agriculture Building
Senior Land Surveyor
TETER, Inc. | Bakersfield, CA
CSU Bakersfield Energy Innovation Building
Senior Land Surveyor
AC Martin | Bakersfield, CA
MLK Park Extension Design
Senior Land Surveyor
City of Delano | Delano, CA
7 GREG THOMPSON, PE, QSD/QSP, CASp
Role: Construction Support Lead
EXPERIENCE
QK Tenure
Industry Tenure
11 years
30 years
LICENSES
Professional Engineer - Civil
California, No. 63219
CERTIFICATIONS
California Certified Access Specialist
Certified Access Specialist Institute,
No. CASp-800
Qualified SWPPP Developer/
Qualified SWPPP Practitioner
California Stormwater Quality
Association, No. 00501
EDUCATION
M.Eng. Construction Engineering
Management
University of British Columbia
B.A.Sc Civil Engineering
University of Waterloo
AFFILIATIONS
American Public Works Association
RELEVANT EXPERTISE
Construction Management + QA/QC
ADA Compliance + CASp Certification
Public Works Construction
Contract Delivery + Administration
Greg brings a career built at the intersection of civil engineering and construction management, with hands-on experience across public works, municipal, and parks and recreation projects. He thrives in the coordination-heavy environment of the bidding and construction phases, consistently building productive working relationships between contractors, owners, and agencies that keep projects moving and on track.
Greg’s certification as a Certified Access Specialist (CASp) adds a valuable layer of oversight to the Alondra Project, where ADA-accessible walkways and inclusive design are core to the City’s vision. His ability to translate accessibility requirements into practical, buildable outcomes means compliance is woven into the construction process from the start, not addressed as an afterthought.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Kovacevich Park – Field of Dreams
ADA/CASp Lead + Construction Manager
City of Arvin | Arvin, CA
MLK Park Extension Design
ADA/CASp Lead + Construction Manager
City of Delano | Delano, CA
Exeter Parks + Recreation Master Plan
ADA/CASp Lead
City of Exeter | Exeter, CA
Belle Terrace Park Improvements
ADA/CASp Lead + Construction Manager
County of Kern | Bakersfield, CA
Bakersfield College Agriculture Building
ADA/CASp Lead + Construction Manager
TETER, Inc. | Bakersfield, CA
Porterville Sports Complex Baseball Field
Senior Construction Manager
City of Porterville | Porterville, CA
Farmersville SR 198 Gateway Beautification Project
Senior Construction Manager
City of Farmersville | Farmersville, CA
Los Banos Animal Shelter Rehabilitation
Senior Construction Manager
City of Los Banos | Los Banos, CA
8 KOVACEVICH PARK “FIELD OF DREAMS AND BASEBALL TEAMS”
ARVIN, CA
OWNER
City of Arvin
DATES
Start Date
Completion Date
February 2023
August 2024
QK’S SCOPE
Civil Engineering Environmental Planning
Construction Management Landscape Architecture
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Arvin won a $1,956,575 grant from Parks for All Californians to renovate and improve Kovacevich Park. The Field of Dreams project includes focused rehabilitation of the existing park and consists of developing concept plans, construction plans, and bid documents for the improvements. QK is producing improvement plans based on site amenity selection, play structure selection, site improvement cost estimates, and specifications, and will provide bidding and construction for the improvements. Our services include removing and replacing sections of the existing baseball and tee-ball fields, playground area, and basketball court. Park amenities and the parking lot will be improved and renovated, along with a topographic site survey of the park site.
APPLICABILITY TO ALONDRA PARK PROJECT
Kovacevich Park mirrors the Alondra Park scope in several key ways: multi-amenity site design, phased PS&E deliverables, topographic surveying, and full bidding and construction support. QK’s experience navigating a grant-funded municipal park from concept through closeout demonstrates the fiscal accountability and phased delivery discipline — Preliminary through Construction — that Project #26-RP0001 requires. Our work selecting and placing playground equipment, rehabilitating sports courts, and improving parking and site amenities maps directly to Alondra Park’s anticipated program, which includes play areas for two age groups, sports activity zones, and vehicular parking. Working within a fixed grant budget also sharpened QK’s approach to cost estimating and scope prioritization, skills directly applicable to a project where the City has noted construction timing may depend on funding availability. 9 MLK PARK EXTENSION DESIGN
DELANO, CA
OWNER
City of Delano
DATES
Start Date
Completion Date
October 2022
August 2025
QK’S SCOPE
Civil Engineering Land Use Planning
Landscape Architecture Public Outreach
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The extension is approximately 2.5 acres and will be attached to the south of the existing MLK Park. The other half of the parcel is currently being constructed with multifamily housing by the Housing Authority of Kern County (HAKC).
Currently, Pop Warner football teams practice at MLK, and the City envisions the new park to be used for active recreation, including exercise equipment and a walking/ jogging path around the site. The project consisted of developing a concept plan, construction plans, and bid documents for park improvements. QK produced improvement plans based on the City’s preferred concept selection, cost estimates, and specifications, and will provide bidding and construction support for the improvements.
APPLICABILITY TO ALONDRA PARK PROJECT
MLK Park Extension directly parallels the active recreation programming at the heart of Alondra Park. QK’s experience designing fitness equipment areas and a walking/jogging path — both explicitly called out in the City’s anticipated park elements — demonstrates hands-on familiarity with the amenity types Bakersfield envisions for this site. The full PS&E delivery model, from concept selection through construction documents, specifications, cost estimates, and bidding support, reflects the same phased structure Project #26-RP0001 requires. Coordinating design on a site adjacent to active multifamily construction also required careful attention to site boundaries, utilities, and phasing considerations that translate well to a greenfield park development like Alondra Park. 10 QK’S SCOPE
Land Use Planning Landscape Architecture
Public Outreach
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
QK worked with the City of Exeter to prepare a comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan to guide the City’s park system and recreation programs over the next 15 years. The Master Plan established a clear vision, goals, and phased objectives for improving and maintaining parks, enhancing accessibility, and expanding recreational opportunities throughout the community. QK’s scope included compiling and analyzing base data, coordinating with City staff and the Exeter Unified School District, leading public engagement meetings, and developing exhibits, maps, and renderings to support the plan’s recommendations.
The Master Plan addressed priorities such as ADA compliance, safety improvements, efficient use of park space, maintenance needs, and identification of funding sources for future enhancements. As part of this effort, QK prepared a conceptual design for Exeter City Park, highlighting opportunities for upgraded amenities, improved circulation, and community gathering spaces, which can be seen on the following page. Through this collaboration, QK helped the City create a practical and forward-looking roadmap for sustainable, accessible, and vibrant parks and recreation facilities.
APPLICABILITY TO ALONDRA PARK PROJECT
QK’s work leading public engagement meetings, translating community feedback into design recommendations, and developing concept-level exhibits directly mirrors the three community engagement meetings central to the Alondra Park scope. Experience prioritizing ADA compliance, accessibility, and phased improvements within funding constraints rounds out the relevance to Project #26-RP0001.
EXETER PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN
EXETER, CA
CHILDREN'S POOL
WATER ADVENTURE
SCALE: 1" = 50'
CITY PARK - MASTER PLAN
OPEN AIR SPACE
AREA FOR SPECIAL EVENTS,
LIGHTING, SEAT WALLS, ELECTRICAL
SERVICE, AND ADA PATH OF TRAVEL
CHILDREN'S POOL WATER ADVENTURE
HISTORICAL BRIDGE AND TRELLIS
(PARENT SEATING AREA), SPLASH
PLAY EQUIPMENT, AND COLORFUL
SAFETY SURFACING
CONCERTS IN THE PARK
NEW AMPHITHEATER, AUDIO, AND
ELECTRICAL SERVICE
DROUGHT TOLERANT GARDEN
WATER WISE LANDSCAPE
SENIOR EVENT AREA
INFORMAL SEATING AREAS AND
HISTORICAL SITE FURNISHINGS
PLAYLAND
EXPAND PLAY SURFACING TO NEW
FENCE, ADDITIONAL SURFACE PLAY
EVENTS, PARENT SEATING WITH
SHADE, AND PERIMETER FENCING
HORSE SHOE AREA
REHABILITATION OF HORSE SHOE
COURTS, NEW CORN HOLE COURTS,
AND NEW SEATING AREA WITH SHADE
RESTROOMS
RESTROOMS, STORAGE, AND PUMP
HOUSE FOR POOL EQUIPMENT
CONCERTS IN
THE PARK
(NEW
AMPHITHEATER)
OPEN AIR SPACE
PLAYLAND
ADA
ACCESSIBLE
SWINGS
HORSE SHOE
AREA
NEW
FENCING
RESTROOMS
SHADED
SEATING
AREA SHADED
SEATING
AREA
SHADED
SEATING
AREA BRIDGE
AND
TRELLIS
PUMP
EQUIPMENT
EXISTING
SEATING
AREA
EXISTING
SEATING
AREA
E. CEDAR ST.
T.
S. E ST.
CORN HOLE
COURTS
INTERNAL PATHWAYS / TRAIL
~1,800 LF OF NEW WALKWAYS WITH
ADA COMPLIANCE AT MAIN SPINE
BIKE TRAIL STATION
BIKE EQUIPMENT STATION ALONG
PROPOSED CLASS III BIKE TRAIL
EXPAND PLAY
SURFACE
12' WIDE MAINTENANCE ACCESS
REMODEL
PICNIC
AREA
ADA PARKING
OWNER
City of Exeter
DATES
Start Date
Completion Date
August 2024
September 2025
PARK MASTER PLAN
Goals and policies development
Needs assessment
Service area recommendations
Restructuring of parks’ classifications
Trends analysis
Funding opportunities
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent - PSVS TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Darin Budak, Director of Recreation and Parks
DATE: April 7, 2026
SUBJECT: Design Consultant Agreement with QK design consultant (not to exceed $479,500) for Hershel Moore Park Design project (Ward 7)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend approval of the agreement.
BACKGROUND: CITY currently owns a 12-acre park site located near the southeast corner of Akers Road and Sierra Madre Avenue known as Herschel Moore Park (Project). The initial steps to develop and construct improvements to the park site require architectural and engineering design work. As part of the FY 2024-25 Budget Process, Council approved project 25RP0003 for Undeveloped Park Design.
On January 21, 2026, Council approved Resolution 009-2026 (Resolution) allowing an on-call library of professional firms (Library) qualified to provide professional services including studies, surveying and mapping, planning, architectural, engineering and design, project management, and construction inspection services. The Resolution stipulates a uniform hourly rate schedule for the Library and QK is a qualified professional consulting firm (Design Consultant).
On February 27, 2026, CITY via Recreation and Parks Department requested a scope of work, fee proposal, and schedule for providing services from the Design Consultant. The Design Consultant submitted a response to the request, which includes a Scope of Work, fee proposal, and schedule. The Design Consultant’s proposal in the amount of $479,500.00, was deemed acceptable by Staff as the rate structure aligned with the Resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT: There are sufficient funds available in the Capital Improvement Program within the Public Safety and Vital Services fund.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Community Character & Quality of Life
Reliable Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:
Hershel Moore Park Design Consultant Agreement
____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 1 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Hershel Moore Park\Hershel Moore Park Design.docx AGREEMENT NO._________________
DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
This DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT is made and entered into on ______________________ (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, a municipal corporation (“CITY”), and QK, a California Corporation, (“DESIGN CONSULTANT”).
R E C I T A L S
WHEREAS, CITY is currently in need of a design consultant for architectural/engineering design work for the Hershel Moore Park, Project # 25RP0003 (the “Project”) which is a 12-acre park site located near the southeast corner of Akers Road and Sierra Madre Avenue; and
WHEREAS, on January 21, 2026, Council approved Resolution 009-2026 approving an on-call library of professional firms (herein “Library”) qualified to provide professional services including studies, surveying and mapping, planning, architectural, engineering and design, project management, and construction inspection services; and
WHEREAS, Resolution 009-2026 stipulates a uniform hourly rate schedule for the Library; and
WHEREAS, DESIGN CONSULTANT is listed in the Library as a qualified professional consulting firm; and
WHEREAS, DESIGN CONSULTANT has provided on-call civil engineering services for CITY in the past; and
WHEREAS, for that reason, on February 27, 2026, CITY, via Recreation and Parks Department requested a scope of work, fee proposal, and schedule for providing services from DESIGN CONSULTANT for design and engineering for Project; and
WHEREAS, DESIGN CONSULTANT submitted a response to the request, which includes a Scope of Work, fee proposal, and schedule; and WHEREAS, DESIGN CONSULTANT represents that it is experienced in the fields of architectural design and engineering as required for the Project and that all of its officers, partners, and/or principals are licensed professionals in engineering, architectural design, or similar professional areas with the appropriate ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 2 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Hershel Moore Park\Hershel Moore Park Design.docx professional degrees; and
WHEREAS, DESIGN CONSULTANT also represents that it has an adequate number of properly licensed and experienced employees on its staff to accomplish the Scope of Work, as defined below, and that it is competent to undertake the Scope of Work; and
WHEREAS, based on these representations and all other representations made by DESIGN CONSULTANT to CITY, CITY desires to retain DESIGN CONSULTANT to perform the Scope of Work.
NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the foregoing recitals herein, CITY and DESIGN CONSULTANT mutually agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF WORK. In exchange for the Compensation (defined below), DESIGN CONSULTANT must competently and thoroughly design and engineer the Project as more specifically described in the Request, attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, and in DESIGN CONSULTANT’s scope of work, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference (collectively, the project description in the RFP and DESIGN CONSULTANT’s scope of work are referred to as “Scope of Work”). The general scope of work is described as providing engineering and surveying services to the CITY for the project. DESIGN CONSULTANT’s services shall include all the procedures necessary to properly complete the Scope of Work, whether specifically included in the Scope of Work or not.
2. COMPENSATION/PAYMENT PROCEDURE. In exchange for performing the Scope of Work and subject to the terms of this section, CITY will pay DESIGN CONSULTANT according to the rate sheet attached as Exhibit B which also includes a Work Breakdown Schedule sheet and is incorporated by reference as follows (“Compensation”):
Actual Costs. CITY will reimburse DESIGN CONSULTANT’s actual costs (including labor costs, employee benefits, overhead, and other direct costs) in an amount not to exceed FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTY-NINE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($479,500.00), exclusive of any fixed fee.
CITY will pay DESIGN CONSULTANT within 30 days after DESIGN CONSULTANT submits an itemized invoice for the portions of the Scope of Work completed and that invoice is approved by CITY. The Compensation will be the total amount paid to DESIGN CONSULTANT for performing the Scope of Work and includes, but is not limited to, all out-of-pocket costs and taxes.
CITY will pay no other compensation to DESIGN CONSULTANT. In no case ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 3 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Hershel Moore Park\Hershel Moore Park Design.docx will CITY compensate DESIGN CONSULTANT more than FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTY-NINE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($479,500.00) for performing the Scope of Work.
3. TERM. Unless terminated sooner as set forth herein, this Agreement shall five (5) years from date of execution listed above.
4. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE. Either party may terminate this Agreement after giving the other party written notice, as provided herein, ten days before the written termination is effective.
5. STARTING WORK. DESIGN CONSULTANT shall not begin work until authorized to do so in writing by CITY. No work will be authorized before the Effective Date.
6. TIME FOR COMPLETION. DESIGN CONSULTANT must complete all the initial design and construction documents phase as listed in Exhibit B Phase 1 and Phase 2 tasks, approved by the City, no later than 20 months of receipt of written authorization from the City. Phase 3 and Phase 4 tasks’ timeline will be determined at a future date and with availability of funding.
7. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR.
CITY’s Contract Administrator is:
Fidel Gonzalez
City of Bakersfield
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
Telephone: (661) 326-3268
DESIGN CONSULTANT’s Project Manager shall be designated as:
Cathy Williams
QK
2080 California Avenue, Suite 220
Bakersfield, CA 93309
Telephone: (661) 616-2600
The Contract Administrator and the Project Manager shall be the primary contact persons for CITY and DESIGN CONSULTANT, respectively.
8. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS. DESIGN CONSULTANT shall, at DESIGN CONSULTANT’s sole cost, comply with all applicable requirements of ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 4 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Hershel Moore Park\Hershel Moore Park Design.docx Municipal, State, and Federal authorities now in force, or which may hereafter be in force, pertaining to this Agreement, and shall faithfully observe in all activities relating to or growing out of this Agreement all Municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes, rules or regulations, and permitting requirements now in force or which may hereafter be in force including, without limitation, obtaining a City of Bakersfield business tax certificate (Bakersfield Municipal Code Chapter 5.02) where required.
9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. This Agreement calls for DESIGN CONSULTANT’s performance of the Scope of Work as an independent consultant. DESIGN CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY for any purpose and is not entitled to any of the benefits provided by CITY to its employees. This Agreement shall not be construed as forming a partnership or any other association with DESIGN CONSULTANT other than that of an independent consultant.
10. DIRECTION. DESIGN CONSULTANT retains the right to control or direct the manner in which the services described herein are performed.
11. EQUIPMENT. DESIGN CONSULTANT will supply all equipment, tools, materials and supplies necessary to perform the services under this Agreement.
12. KEY PERSONNEL. DESIGN CONSULTANT shall name all key personnel to be assigned to perform the Scope of Work. All key personnel shall be properly licensed and experienced for the work to be performed under this Agreement. DESIGN CONSULTANT shall provide background for each of the key personnel including, without limitation, resumes and work experience performing work similar to the Scope of Work. CITY reserves the right to approve key personnel. Once the key personnel are approved, DESIGN CONSULTANT shall not change such personnel without CITY’s written approval.
13. INCLUDED DOCUMENTS. Any bid documents, including, without limitation, special provisions and standard specifications and any Request for Proposals, Request for Qualifications and responses thereto relating to this Agreement are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
14. LICENSES. DESIGN CONSULTANT shall, at DESIGN CONSULTANT’s sole cost and expense, have at the time of bidding or proposal submission and shall keep in full force and effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for DESIGN CONSULTANT to practice its profession in the State of California and perform the Scope of Work. DESIGN CONSULTANT must also ensure that all employees or subconsultants assigned to perform any portion of the Scope ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 5 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Hershel Moore Park\Hershel Moore Park Design.docx of Work are properly licensed. If DESIGN CONSULTANT is a corporation, at least one officer or key employee shall hold the required licenses or professional degrees. If DESIGN CONSULTANT is a partnership, at least one partner shall hold the required licensees or professional degrees. DESIGN CONSULTANT must provide proof that the requirements of this section are met when requested by CITY.
15. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. The Scope of Work shall be performed in conformity with all legal requirements and industry standards observed by a specialist of COSULTANT’s profession in California.
16. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. DESIGN CONSULTANT hereby represents that both corporately and individually the firm and its employees and subconsultants:
16.1 Do not have, and will not have, financial interest in either the success or failure of any project which is dependent upon DESIGN CONSULTANT’s performance of the Scope of Work; and
16.2 Are not currently, and will not be, employed by or under contract to any contractor who may be awarded the contract to construct the Project.
17. SB 854 COMPLIANCE. To the extent Labor Code Section 1771.1 applies to this Agreement, a consultant or subconsultant shall not be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, be subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, as defined in this chapter, unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5.
It is not a violation of Labor Code Section 1771.1 for an unregistered consultant to submit a bid that is authorized by Section 7029.1 of the Business and Professions Code or by Section 10164 or 20103.5 of the Public Contract Code, provided the consultant is registered to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 at the time the contract is awarded. The prime consultant is required to post job site notices in compliance with Title 8 California Code of Regulations Section 16451. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
18. ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. CITY’s acceptance of work or payment for work shall not constitute a waiver of any portion or any provision of this Agreement.
19. NO WAIVER OF DEFAULT. The failure of any party to enforce against another ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 6 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Hershel Moore Park\Hershel Moore Park Design.docx party any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of that party’s right to enforce such a provision at a later time, and shall not serve to vary the terms of this Agreement.
20. INSURANCE.
20.1 Types and Limits of Insurance. In addition to any other insurance or security required under this Agreement, DESIGN CONSULTANT must procure and maintain, for the duration of this Agreement, the types and limits of insurance below (“Basic Insurance Requirements”).
20.1.1 Professional liability insurance, providing coverage on claims made basis for errors and omissions with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
20.1.2 Automobile liability insurance, providing coverage for owned, non-owned, and hired autos on an occurrence
basis for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage, and personal injury, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
20.1.3 Commercial general liability insurance, unless otherwise approved by CITY’s Risk Manager, providing coverage on
an occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage, and personal
injury, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
The policy must:
20.1.3.1 Provide contractual liability coverage for the terms of this Agreement;
20.1.3.2 Provide products and completed operations
coverage;
20.1.3.3 Provide premises, operations, and mobile
equipment coverage; and
20.1.3.4 Contain an additional insured endorsement in
favor of CITY and its mayor, council, officers,
agents, employees, and designated volunteers.
20.1.4 Workers' compensation insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. In accordance with the
provisions of Labor Code Section 3700, every contractor will ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 7 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Hershel Moore Park\Hershel Moore Park Design.docx be required to secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1861, DESIGN
CONSULTANT must submit to CITY the following certification before beginning any work on the Improvements:
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the
Labor Code which require every employer to be
insured against liability for worker’s compensation or
to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the
provisions of that code, and I will comply with such
provisions before commencing the performance of
the work of this contract.
By executing this Agreement, DESIGN CONSULTANT is
submitting the certification required above.
The policy must contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY and its mayor, council, officers, agents, employees, and designated volunteers.
20.2 General Provisions Applying to All Insurance Types.
20.2.1 All policies required of DESIGN CONSULTANT must be written on a first-dollar coverage basis, or contain a deductible provision. Subject to CITY’s advance approval, DESIGN
CONSULTANT may utilize a self-insured retention in any or all of the policies provided, but the policy or policies may not contain language, whether added by endorsement or
contained in the policy conditions, that prohibits
satisfaction of any self-insured provision or requirement by anyone other than the named insured or by any means
including other insurance or which is intended to defeat the intent or protection of an additional insured.
20.2.2 Except for professional liability insurance, all policies required of DESIGN CONSULTANT must be primary insurance as to CITY and its mayor, council, officers, agents,
employees, or designated volunteers and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CITY and its mayor, council, officers, agents, employees, and designated volunteers
must be excess of DESIGN CONSULTANT’s insurance and
must not contribute with it.
20.2.3 The insurance required above, except for workers’ ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 8 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Hershel Moore Park\Hershel Moore Park Design.docx compensation insurance, must be placed with insurers with a Best’s rating as approved by CITY’s Risk Manager, but in no event less than A-:VII. Any deductibles, self-insured retentions, or insurance in lesser amounts, or lack of certain types of insurance otherwise required by this Agreement, or insurance rated below Best’s A-:VII, must be declared prior to execution of this Agreement and approved by CITY in
writing.
20.2.4 The insurance required in this section must be maintained until the Scope of Work is satisfactorily completed as
evidenced by CITY’s written acceptance. All policies must provide that there will be continuing liability thereon, notwithstanding any recovery on any policy.
20.2.5 Full compensation for all premiums which the DESIGN CONSULTANT is required to pay to satisfy the Basic Insurance Requirements shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the performance of the Scope of Work, and no
additional allowance will be made therefore or for
additional premiums which may be required by extensions of the policies of insurance.
20.2.6 It is further understood and agreed by DESIGN CONSULTANT that its liability to CITY will not in any way be limited to or affected by the amount of insurance obtained and carried by DESIGN CONSULTANT in connection with this Agreement.
20.2.7 Unless otherwise approved by CITY, if any part of the Scope of Work is subcontracted, the Basic Insurance Requirements must be provided by, or on behalf of, all subconsultants even if CITY has approved lesser insurance requirements for DESIGN CONSULTANT, and all subconsultants must agree in writing to be bound by the provisions of this section.
21. THIRD PARTY CLAIMS. In the case of public works contracts CITY will timely notify DESIGN CONSULTANT of third party claims relating to this contract.
CITY shall be allowed to recover from DESIGN CONSULTANT and DESIGN CONSULTANT shall pay on demand, all costs of notification.
22. INDEMNITY.
22.1 DESIGN CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CITY and CITY’s officers, agents and employees against any and all ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 9 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Hershel Moore Park\Hershel Moore Park Design.docx liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands whatsoever against them, arising from DESIGN CONSULTANT’s negligence, fraud, willful misconduct, criminal conduct, errors and omissions, or breaches of contract, or any of them, before administrative or judicial tribunals of any kind whatsoever, arising out of, connected with, or caused by DESIGN CONSULTANT or DESIGN CONSULTANT’s employees, agents, independent consultants, companies, or subconsultants in the performance of, or in any way arising from, the terms and provisions of this Agreement whether or not caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder, except for CITY’s sole active negligence or willful misconduct.
22.2 To the extent Civil Code Section 2782.8 is applicable to this Agreement, the DESIGN CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY and CITY’s officers, agents and employees against any and all liability, claims, actions, causes of action or demands, against them, or any of them, before administrative or judicial tribunals of any kind whatsoever, that only arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of DESIGN CONSULTANT. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the design professional exceed the design professional's proportionate percentage of fault. However, notwithstanding the previous sentence, in the event one or more defendants is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, the design professional shall meet and confer with other parties regarding unpaid defense costs. The duty to indemnify, including the duty and the cost to defend, is limited as provided in this section. This section shall not be waived or modified by contractual agreement, act, or omission of the parties.
23. ASSIGNMENT. Neither this Agreement nor any rights, interests, duties, liabilities, obligations or responsibilities arising out of, concerning or related in any way to this Agreement (including, but not limited to, accounts, actions, causes of action, claims, damages, demands, liabilities, losses, obligations, or reckonings of any kind or nature whatsoever, for compensatory or exemplary and punitive damages, or declaratory, equitable or injunctive relief, whether based on contract, equity, tort or other theories of recovery provided for by the common or statutory law) may be assigned or transferred by any party. Any such assignment is prohibited, and shall be unenforceable and otherwise null and void without the need for further action by the non-assigning party or parties.
24. CONFIDENTIALITY. During the term of this Agreement, DESIGN CONSULTANT may have disclosed to it information of a legal and confidential nature, and such information could severely damage CITY if disclosed to outside parties. ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 10 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Hershel Moore Park\Hershel Moore Park Design.docx Except as otherwise required by law, when informed that information is confidential, DESIGN CONSULTANT will not disclose to any person, directly or indirectly, either during the term of this Agreement or at any time thereafter, any such information or use such information other than as necessary in the course of this Agreement. All documents DESIGN CONSULTANT prepares and confidential information given to DESIGN CONSULTANT under this Agreement are the exclusive property of CITY.
Under no circumstances shall any such information or documents be removed from CITY without CITY’s prior written consent.
25. ACCOUNTING RECORDS. DESIGN CONSULTANT shall maintain accurate accounting records and other written documentation pertaining to all costs incurred in performance of this Agreement. Such records and documentation shall be kept at DESIGN CONSULTANT’s office during the term of this Agreement, and for a period of three years from the date of the final payment hereunder and made available to CITY representatives upon request at any time during regular business hours.
26. BINDING EFFECT. The rights and obligations of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the parties to the Agreement and their heirs, administrators, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns.
27. CORPORATE AUTHORITY. Each individual signing this Agreement on behalf of entities represents and warrants that they are, respectively, duly authorized to sign on behalf of the entities and to bind the entities fully to each and all of the obligations set forth in this Agreement.
28. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered as an original and be effective as such.
29. EXECUTION. This Agreement is effective upon execution. It is the product of negotiation and all parties are equally responsible for authorship of this Agreement. Section 1654 of the California Civil Code shall not apply to the interpretation of this Agreement.
30. EXHIBITS. In the event of a conflict between the terms, conditions or specifications set forth in this Agreement and those in exhibits attached hereto, the terms, conditions, or specifications set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. All exhibits to which reference is made in this Agreement are deemed incorporated in this Agreement, whether or not actually attached.
____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 11 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Hershel Moore Park\Hershel Moore Park Design.docx
31. FURTHER ASSURANCES. Each party shall execute and deliver such papers, documents, and instruments, and perform such acts as are necessary or appropriate, to implement the terms of this Agreement and the intent of the parties to this Agreement.
32. GOVERNING LAW. The laws of the State of California will govern the validity of this Agreement and its interpretation and performance. Any litigation arising in any way from this Agreement shall be brought in Kern County, California.
33. INTERPRETATION. Whenever the context so requires, the masculine gender includes the feminine and neuter, and the singular number includes the plural.
34. MERGER AND MODIFICATION. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all other oral or written representations. This Agreement may be modified only in a writing approved by the City Council and signed by all the parties.
35. NEWS RELEASES/INTERVIEWS. All news releases, media interviews, testimony at hearings and public comments relating to this Agreement by DESIGN CONSULTANT shall be prohibited unless authorized by CITY.
36. NON-INTEREST. No CITY officer or employee shall hold any interest in this Agreement (California Government Code section 1090).
37. NOTICES. All notices relative to this Agreement shall be given in writing and shall be personally served or sent by certified or registered mail and be effective upon actual personal service or depositing in the United States mail. The parties shall be addressed as follows, or at any other address designated by notice:
CITY: CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
CITY HALL
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
DESIGN CONSULTANT: QK
5080 California Avenue, Suite 220
Bakersfield, CA 93309
(661) 616-2600
38. RESOURCE ALLOCATION. All CITY obligations under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation and allocation of resources by ____________________________________________________________________________ DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Page 12 of 12
S:\ADMINISTRATION DIVISION\Agreements\2026\QK Park Design Agreements\Hershel Moore Park\Hershel Moore Park Design.docx the City Council.
39. TITLE TO DOCUMENTS. All documents, plans, and drawings, maps, photographs, and other papers, or copies thereof prepared by DESIGN CONSULTANT pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, shall, upon preparation, become CITY property.
40. TAX NUMBERS.
DESIGN CONSULTANT’s Federal Tax ID Number 94-2228472
DESIGN CONSULTANT is a corporation? Yes X No (Please check one.) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the Effective Date.
“CITY” “DESIGN CONSULTANT”
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD QK
By: By:_________________________________
KAREN GOH, Mayor Type or Print Name:
Title:
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
RECREATION AND PARKS DEPARMENT
By:_______________________________
DARIN BUDAK
Recreation and Parks Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM: COUNTERSIGNED:
Deputy City Attorney:_______________________ Finance Director: _____________________
VIRIDIANA GALLARDO-KING RANDY MCKEEGAN
Insurance:____________
Attachments: Exhibit A: Request for Proposal
Exhibit B: Scope of Work/Compensation
Ronald J. Wathen, PE #58690
President/CEO
Recreation & Parks Department
1600 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301
661-326-3866 FAX: 661-852-2140
Recreation and Parks Department
DARIN BUDAK, DIRECTOR
February 27, 2026
Re: Request for Scope of Work, Fee Proposal, and Schedule for Hershel Moore Park (Project #25RP0003) Ms. Cathy Williams
QK, Inc.
5080 California Avenue, Suite 220
Bakersfield, CA 93309
Dear Ms. Williams:
The City of Bakersfield respectfully requests that your firm submit a scope of work, fee proposal, and project schedule for professional design services associated with the above-referenced park development project.
The City is contacting you as a potential consultant from the City’s Library of Consultants, approved by City Council Resolution No. 009-2026 on January 21, 2026. The selected consultant and/or subconsultants must demonstrate design experience in the development of public parks, including but not limited to surveying, site grading and drainage, civil engineering, landscape architecture, irrigation, and electrical design.
The scope of services will include all necessary tasks to design a large neighborhood public park. Services shall include but not be limited to: topographic surveying; environmental and biological services; storm water management; preparation and review and approval of 30%, 75%, and 100% plans (grading, utility, electrical, landscape, irrigation, etc.), specifications and engineer’s estimate (PS&E); bidding support services; construction technical support; utility coordination; and community engagement support.
Please itemize your proposal in accordance with the requirements outlined in the City’s Library of Consultants documents and organize your fee proposal under the following phases:
Preliminary Phase (fixed fee)
Design Phase (fixed fee)
Bidding Phase (time and materials, not to exceed)
Construction Phase (time and materials, not to exceed)
The project site consists of approximately 12 gross acres owned by the City, located near the southeast corner of Akers Road and Sierra Madre Avenue. The purpose of this project is to provide park site improvements and greening elements to an undeveloped property designated for large neighborhood public park use.
Based on community engagement feedback, anticipated park elements may include, but are not limited to:
Playground equipment areas for 2-5- and 5–12-year-olds. (PlayCore-Gametime) Fitness equipment area (PlayCore-Gametime)
ADA accessible concrete walkways
Looped stabilized decomposed granite trail
LED security light poles and bollards
Prefabricated restroom building. (Future)
Splash pad play area. (Future)
Sports activity areas i.e. basketball, volleyball, running track, soccer, disk golf, etc.
Individual and large picnic shelter areas
Dog Park (small & large)
Vehicular parking lot
EXHIBIT A
Plant palette to include:
Drought tolerant, low water use trees and shrubs
Trees/shrubs with verifiable environmental benefits such as capture of greenhouse gas and particulate matter.
Trees/shrubs which provide habitat benefits for wildlife Several native plant species
Trees which will provide substantial shade canopy once mature.
The project timeline is as follows:
February 27, 2026 City issues RFP
March 20, 2026 Proposal due
April 8, 2026 City Council awards design contract (tentatively) April 29, 2026 Design Kickoff Meeting/ City issues Notice to Proceed (tentatively) May 1st – Oct. 1st , 2026 (3) Community Engagement Meetings for Design Input & Conceptual Drawing Oct 1st , 2026 – April 30,
2027
Design Consultant submits 30%, 75%, & 100% final plans, specification and engineer’s estimate (PS&E) to City for review & approval process through Rec. & Parks and Building Departments.
The tentative project bidding and construction phases schedule are as follows.
June-July 2027 Responsibility Statements & Questionnaires (RSQ) Process. (Establish Final Bidder’s List) August- September 2027 Formal Bidding Process
October-November 2027 Contract Award
December 2027 Pre-Construction Meeting
January 2028 Start of Construction
December 2028 Completion of Construction
The 100% design plans, specifications, and engineer’s estimate are expected to be completed on or before May 1, 2027. Due to funding availability at the time of design phase completion, construction phase may be delayed.
The City requests your firm submit a written fee proposal, scope of work, and time schedule for this project by Friday, March 20th, 2026.
If you have any questions concerning this project, please contact Fidel Gonzalez at 661-326-3268 or email at [email protected].
Very truly yours,
Darin Budak
Recreation and Parks Director
By:
Fidel Gonzalez
Park Construction & Facilities Planner
Enclosure:
Site Grant Deed
cc: Darin Budak, Keith Howell, Rajan Mistry, Sara Ortiz, & File March 20, 2026
Fidel Gonzalez
Park Construction & Facilities Planner
City of Bakersfield
1501 Truxton Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301
Subject: Proposal for City of Bakersfield – Hershel Moore Park (Project #25RP0003) Dear Mr. Gonzalez:
We are honored and excited that QK has been given the opportunity to present the City of Bakersfield (City) with our proposal for comprehensive design services for the Hershel Moore Park Project (Project). Hershel Moore Park represents an opportunity to create a highly activated, inclusive neighborhood destination that reflects the needs of the surrounding community. The following represents our overall understanding, approach, and scope of services in response to the Request for Proposal issued for the Project.
QK is a full-service professional design firm that offers a comprehensive suite of services under one roof. Our proposal includes a full complement of associated services and will be led by our recently expanded landscape architecture practice group, all working seamlessly to provide the City with the highest park design services.
With QK’s commitment to quality design and service to our clients, the City can be assured that Hershel Moore Park will be thoughtfully designed and delivered, resulting in a resilient, maintainable, and highly utilized community asset to serve the community for generations to come.
We welcome any questions or clarifications you may have regarding our proposal and are extremely excited about this opportunity to partner again with the City to deliver another lasting, recreational amenity to the Bakersfield community.
APPROACH
Our approach is guided by three core principles: (1) Community-driven design, (2) alignment with available and future funding strategies, and (3) long-term operability and maintenance efficiency. QK will provide community engagement services and coordinate in concert with the City to develop a community-focused neighborhood park based on residents’ feedback. As outlined in more detail in Tasks 1.3 and 1.4, we will design several Concept Plan park alternatives for review by the City staff and residents. Once changes are discussed and a Concept Plan alternative has been selected, QK will move into the design phase, preparing documents required to construct the park improvements. We recognize that community desires often exceed available funding; therefore, our process is structured to prioritize amenities, offer potential phasing strategies, and align design decisions within realistic budget parameters.
Based on the community engagement feedback, site constraints, and budget considerations, anticipated park elements may include, but are not limited to:
• Playground equipment areas for two–to five-year-olds and five–to 12-year-olds. • Fitness equipment area.
• ADA accessible concrete walkways.
• Looped stabilized decomposed granite trail.
• LED security light poles and bollards.
• Prefabricated restroom building (Future).
EXHIBIT B
Fidel Gonzalez – City of Bakersfield Page 2 of 11
March 20, 2026
• Splash pad play area (Future).
• Sports activity areas, i.e., basketball, volleyball, running track, soccer, disc golf, etc. • Individual and large picnic shelter areas.
• Dog Park for small and large dogs.
• Vehicular parking lot.
The following includes our Scope of Services, Project Schedule, and Fee Estimate in accordance with City requirements for your review and consideration.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
PHASE 1.O PRELIMINARY PHASE
This phase establishes the technical, community, and regulatory foundation to advance the project into the design phase.
TASK 1.1 PROJECT COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT
QK will provide overall Project management for the Project, coordinating with the City to provide timely communication and organization. The Project management responsibilities include the following:
• Perform administration of the Project.
• Prepare and adhere to the master Project schedule.
• Direct and coordinate overall team efforts.
• Coordinate and conduct Project meetings with the City staff as noted in the tasks below. • Respond to City staff questions and correspondence.
• Oversee all work items identified in the Scope of Services. • Perform Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) measures, establishing that the design is in conformance with applicable standards and policies and with QK’s established QA/QC program. • Coordinate review submittals and approvals with the City. • Prepare and submit Project invoices monthly.
Deliverables:
• Master Project schedule in PDF format
• Response(s) to City staff questions/correspondence, electronic format • Project invoices (monthly), hard copy
TASK 1.2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
QK will perform a field survey for the subject property, providing necessary base files to the design team. This survey will be referenced to the City control stations for both horizontal and vertical values. Our scope of services will consist of the following elements:
• Spot elevations to determine contours.
• Street grades to the centerline, including the flowline back of the walk and the pavement. • All above-ground features, including fences, power poles, signs, and visible above-ground utilities within the outlined area.
• Existing trees, noting diameter at breast height and the drip line for trees that have a canopy within the specified area of the survey.
• Post-process field data and analyze the accuracy and completeness of data. • Import topographic data into AutoCAD and reduce it to a readable, uniform scale CAD drawing. • Create a surface to show contours.
• QA/QC review of files by a professional land surveyor.
Fidel Gonzalez – City of Bakersfield Page 3 of 11
March 20, 2026
Deliverable:
• Topographic survey including points, planimetric data, and surface information in AutoCAD Civil 3D 2026 format to be used in project concept and design
Exclusions and Assumptions:
• Subsurface utility verification is excluded from this scope.
TASK 1.3 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
QK will conduct community engagement activities for the Project in partnership with the City. Three (3) public meetings are proposed to encourage local residents to offer suggestions and assist the City in determining the amenities to be included in the park. The public outreach meetings will take place in a location and at a time determined by the City. QK will prepare and provide large-scale Concept Plans (see Task 1.4), printed materials, and exhibit boards to provide visuals for the public to review and comment. Participants can view the boards at their leisure, and QK staff will be on hand to present and discuss the contents of the Project.
As part of this task, QK staff will coordinate with park users and the City to identify and prioritize the appropriate facilities and amenities of the Project. Initial site design concept alternatives plans will be proposed and evolve from site conditions, and the design program parameters established for the Project. A proper balance between community desires, potential budget parameters, and phasing requirements will be incorporated into the planning process.
Strong considerations will be given to activity/use relationships that balance the variety of park users with the City’s parameters, focusing on the physical site characteristics, adjacent land uses, facility standards, maintenance operations, and budget/phasing requirements.
The Final Park Concept Plan will incorporate the draft concept elements into a final product that best responds to site conditions, meets the recreation needs and desires of the community, and fosters public support to achieve the overall success of the Project.
Deliverables:
• Exhibit boards with various components of the prepared renderings in PDF format and hard copy • PowerPoint presentation in PPT and PDF formats
• Attendee Check-in station to track attendance at each meeting • Notes from the community meetings in PDF format
• Survey Monkey setup and results in electronic format
Exclusions and Assumptions:
• Translation services at public meetings are excluded. • Childcare services at public meetings are excluded.
• We assume the City will provide power, a microphone, tables, chairs, and a screen for presentations at public meetings.
TASK 1.4 PARK DESIGN CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES AND FINAL CONCEPT PLAN As noted in Task 1.3 Community Engagement, QK will develop three (3) Concept Plan options. We anticipate up to three (3) check-in meetings with the City staff to review park concept development. Once a preferred concept is selected and approved, QK will prepare one (1) Final Park Concept Plan showing the layout of the approved park amenities. QK will meet with the City staff to review and make modifications before moving into the construction drawings. During this task, QK will confirm the City’s design and construction criteria. 3D models and photo-realistic perspective renderings will be generated based on the Concept Plan to help the community visualize the vision of the Hershel Moore Park site.
Deliverables:
• Notes from the meetings with City staff in PDF format • Three (3) Concept Plan options in PDF format
• One (1) updated Conceptual Design Master Plan in PDF format Fidel Gonzalez – City of Bakersfield Page 4 of 11
March 20, 2026
• One (1) preliminary cost estimate based on the Final Park Concept Plan in PDF format • Three (3) photo-realistic perspective renderings in PDF format TASK 1.5 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Under contract with QK, Soils Engineering, Inc. (SEI), will conduct a geotechnical investigation of the Project site. SEI’s investigation will include:
• Five (5) borings to a depth of 15 feet or refusal, whichever comes first. • One (1) bulk sample will be taken from the borings for pavement design information. • Undisturbed and bulk soil samples of representative subsurface soils will be obtained at five (5) foot intervals. • Field exploration.
• Laboratory testing.
• Engineering analysis.
• Report preparation will include criteria and recommendations in the following areas:
o Earthwork.
o Foundations.
o Pavement Design recommendations based on R-values.
Deliverable:
• Geotechnical Report in PDF format
PHASE 2.0 DESIGN PHASE
This phase advances the approved concept into design documents preparation for bidding and construction.
TASK 2.1 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT – 30% SUBMITTAL
QK will prepare design development documents based on the approved Final Concept Plan and refinements to park features. The design development documents and outline specifications will be prepared to a 30% design level and provided to City staff to review and comment on the Project’s design components, materials, products, and detailing prior to the preparation of detailed construction documents. A supplemental product submittal booklet shall include product manufacturer catalog cut sheets for proposed site furnishings, materials, and irrigation equipment. QK will provide an opinion of probable costs (OPIC) based on the design development documents. The 30% submittal represents a critical milestone for alignment regarding design direction, materials, and budget prior to advancing to detailed construction documents.
The plans are envisioned to include the following:
• Title Sheet and General Notes
• Topographic Survey
• Demolition Plans
• Grading and Utility Plans
• Site Layout and Amenity Reference Plan with Enlargement Plans as necessary • Landscape and Irrigation Plans
• Lighting and Electrical Plans (see Task 2.4)
We will contact the existing utility companies to request utility plat maps showing locations of existing infrastructure for the purpose of locating facilities, coordinating potential relocations, and aiding in the preliminary design phase of the project.
Deliverables:
• One (1) 30% design development submittal document in PDF format • One (1) preliminary OPIC in PDF format
Fidel Gonzalez – City of Bakersfield Page 5 of 11
March 20, 2026
• One (1) supplemental product submittal booklet in PDF format TASK 2.2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (PS&E) – 75% AND 100% SUBMITTAL QK will prepare Construction Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) for City approval and bidding. Based on the approved 30% design development documents and construction budget, QK will prepare complete construction documents as applicable in accordance with the local and State codes, standards, and specifications. QK will confirm the requirements for specifications and bid schedules with the City staff. QK will provide the construction documents to the City for review at the 75% and 100% stages. Subsequent submittals will address comments from the previous submittal, and the previous markup will be provided. QK assumes that the City will prepare the bid document package, and QK will provide technical specifications and an OPIC. Scope and anticipated deliverables from associated disciplines are noted in the task items below.
The plans will include the following:
• Title Sheet and General Notes
• Topographic Survey
• Demolition Plans
• Grading and Utility Plans
• Site Layout and Amenity Reference Plans
• Landscape Planting and Irrigation Plans
• Construction and Landscape Details, including structural-related drawings and calculations • Lighting and Electrical Plans
Deliverables:
• One (1) 24”x36” PDF set of the 75% complete PS&E documents for the City’s review and comment • One (1) PDF set of City plan check comments received from 30% submittal • One (1) meeting to review and discuss the 75% PS&E submittal • One (1) 24”x36” PDF set of the 100% complete final PS&E documents • One (1) original stamped and signed set of the PS&E documents for reproduction by the City • One (1) PDF set of City plan check comments received from 75% submittal Exclusions and Assumptions:
• Progress and schedule between submittal stages are dependent on timely review and consolidated feedback.
TASK 2.3 CASP REVIEW
QK’s Certified Access Specialist (CASp) will provide two (2) CASp reviews of the Project civil plans for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements under the California Building Code (CBC). QK will coordinate reviews with the City and provide comments. QK will provide a letter from the CASp reviewer upon completion.
Deliverable:
• One (1) CASp Review Letter in PDF format
TASK 2.4 ELECTRICAL AND LIGHTING PLANS
Under contract with QK, Rose, Sing, Eastham & Associates (RSE) will provide electrical design documents to support the construction of the Project in accordance with the City standards. Two (2) site visits are included in this scope of services. RSE’s scope of services includes:
• Site Electrical Plan
• Site and Parking Lot Lighting Plan
• Line Diagrams, Schedules, and Details
• Energy Compliance Documents (Title 24)
Fidel Gonzalez – City of Bakersfield Page 6 of 11
March 20, 2026
• 30%, 75%, and 100% Design Packages
• Calculations
• Working Drawings
• Specifications
• Submittal Review
Deliverables:
• Energy Compliance Documents (Title 24) in PDF format
• One (1) 30% design package for City review and comment (included as part of Task 2.1 submittal) in PDF format.
• One (1) 24”x36” PDF set of the 75% complete PS&E documents for City review and comment (included as part of Task 2.2 deliverable)
• One (1) 24”x36” PDF set of the 100% complete final PS&E documents (included as part of Task 2.2 deliverable)
• One (1) original signed set of PS&E documents for reproduction by the City (included as part of Task 2.2 deliverable)
TASK 2.5 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
Under contract with QK, Cornerstone Structural Engineering Group (CSEG) will provide structural design services to provide structural calculations, plans, and book specifications in CSI format for the construction of the structural elements of the Project. The plans and calculations will be designed according to the force level provisions in the 2025 California Building Code. The structural sheets will include structural notes, typical details, structural details, and elevations. CSEG’s scope of services includes:
• Review geotechnical engineering report and technical data sheets provided by others for criteria pertaining to the design of anchorage bolts and foundations for the park site improvements. • Prepare structural drawings depicting sections and details of the park site improvement anchorage bolts and foundations. Anticipated sheets include:
o S0.01 Project Data & Specifications
o S2.01 Foundation Plans
o S4.01 Foundation Details
o S4.02 Foundation Details
• Prepare supporting structural calculations for the park site improvement anchorage bolts and foundations. • Prepare structural technical specifications in CSI format related to the park site improvement anchorage bolts and foundations, including both sheet specs and book specs. • Respond to plan check comments from the 30%, 75%, and 100% submittals, including written responses to City Building Department comments.
• Submit electronic (PDF) copies of the structural drawings, calculations, and technical specifications sealed and signed by a licensed Structural Engineer.
Deliverable:
• One (1) 30% structural design document and calculations for City review and comment (included as part of Task 2.1 submittal) in PDF format.
• One (1) 24”x36” PDF set of the 75% structural drawings, calculations, and technical specifications documents for City review and comment (included as part of Task 2.2 deliverable) • One (1) 24”x36” PDF set of the 100% complete final structural drawings, calculations, and technical specifications (included as part of Task 2.2 deliverable) • One (1) original signed set of structural drawings, calculations, and technical specifications documents by a licensed Structural Engineer (included as part of Task 2.2 deliverable) Fidel Gonzalez – City of Bakersfield Page 7 of 11
March 20, 2026
TASK 2.6 STORMWATER POLLUTION AND PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) QK will provide engineering services and coordination with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to obtain coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit, Water Quality Order #2009-0009-DWQ, as amended by Order #2010-0014-DWQ, #2012-006-DWQ, and WQ2022-0057-DWQ for the proposed construction Project. The environmental services include the following:
• Prepare Notice of Intent (NOI) and all required Permit Registration Documents (PRDs), including, but not limited to, the Risk Assessment and Post-Construction Water Balance as required by the State, for the owner/Legally Responsible Person (LRP).
• Assist the LRP in electronically filing the NOI and PRDs online using the State's Stormwater Multi-Application & Reporting System (SMARTS).
• Prepare a SWPPP outlining Best Management Practice (BMP) site recommendations for both pre- and postconstruction activities. • Provide one (1) SWPPP Manual to be referenced and maintained on site by the contractor during construction.
Deliverable:
• One (1) hard copy of completed SWPPP
The above-described SWPPP preparation services will be provided for a fixed fee as shown in the Fee Estimate section. This fee excludes any additional filing fees associated with the SWPPP required by the SWRCB. This fee also assumes that the Project description and control measures will not be revised after submittal of the SWPPP to the SWRCB. Any additional revisions to the SWPPP would be on a Time-and-Materials (T&M) basis. Any additional work outside of this scope will be prepared under separate authorization.
PHASE 3.0 BIDDING PHASE
This phase advances the approved design documents to bidding and construction.
TASK 3.1 BIDDING SUPPORT SERVICES
QK will prepare the Project-specific bid documents, technical specifications, and information described in Task 2.2 above for the City’s preparation of the final Project manual. The City will compile the final Project manual utilizing the specification and related bid documents from QK. The City will include the most current edition of the City’s “front end” documents, including, but not limited to, Notice to Contractors, Information for Bidders, bidding documents, General Provisions, agreement, etc., for the City’s use in advertising the Project.
Services include support for the City’s intended two-part bidding strategy: prequalification of bidders through a Responsibility Statements and Questionnaires (RSQs) process, followed by a formal bidding process by prequalified contractors.
QK will assist the City in evaluating RSQs from interested responsive bidders to determine a qualified bidders list for formal bidding. Assistance may include administration, evaluation, and recommendation. We have budgeted 24 hours for this task. If the City requests further assistance, QK can provide additional services on a T&M basis as may be requested.
QK will provide formal bidding process support through the fielding of bidder requests for information (Bid RFIs) and support the City’s production and distribution of bid documents and addenda throughout the course of the bid process. QK will host the bid documents on our plan room website. QK will attend the City’s pre-bid bidders’ conference at the City’s office and on-site, with design professionals responding to bidders’ questions as appropriate.
QK will evaluate the lowest three (3) responsive bids and provide recommendations to the City for contract award.
RSE and CSEG will assist QK and the City as requested during bidding. Services to be provided may include answering questions, providing consultation and interpretation of the construction documents, assisting in preparation of Fidel Gonzalez – City of Bakersfield Page 8 of 11
March 20, 2026
addenda to the PS&E during the advertisement period, and assisting in the evaluation of the bids received. Attendance at pre-bid meetings or bid opening can be provided if requested.
Deliverables:
• One (1) complete PDF set of the Bid Document Package
• Administrative support and/or evaluation and recommendations as directed by the City • Up to 15 Bid RFI responses via email
• Up to five (5) Bid addenda in PDF format
• Bid evaluation and recommendation in PDF format
PHASE 4.0 CONSTRUCTION PHASE
We understand the City is seeking funds for the construction phase of the project. QK requests the opportunity to revisit the scope of services and fee estimate for this phase prior to commencement of work.
TASK 4.1 CONSTRUCTION TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Upon successful completion of contract formation, QK will support the City during the pre-construction meeting by developing an agenda for and attending the pre-construction meeting with the contractor, City, and other parties.
QK will attend regular City-led progress meetings by electronic meeting software (Microsoft Teams or other) for up to 26 meetings.
QK will implement Project management controls using Procore management software and provide access to the City and contractor staff. QK will respond to RFIs and provide submittal reviews. RSE and CSEG will support QK and the City during construction by reviewing necessary contractor submittals and answering questions and/or RFIs. For budget purposes, we have budgeted 20 RFI responses and 25 submittal and resubmittal reviews.
QK will provide design support during construction to address emergent issues affecting design changes or field conditions. For budgeting purposes, we have budgeted 60 hours of staff design time.
QK will provide an on-site review of construction progress by our design staff. We are budgeting for six (6) progress visits during construction.
QK will visit the site upon completion to evaluate the contractor’s work. We will identify items requiring remediation for inclusion in the master Project punch list.
Deliverables:
• RFI and submittal logs as requested in PDF format
• Up to 20 RFI responses in PDF format
• Up to 25 Submittal responses in PDF format
• Change documentation in PDF format
Based on our recent conversation on March 17, 2026, QK recommends the following tasks be completed to establish environmental compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and State and federal environmental regulations.
TASK 4.2 CEQA NOTICE OF EXEMPTION (NOE)
Based on our current understanding, we anticipate that a 15301 (c) Existing Facilities Class 1 exemption would be appropriate to cover the activity at the existing dog park, subject to City determination and confirmation. An NOE will be prepared and will include technical memos to substantiate that the determination is the sufficient level of effort needed to comply with CEQA.
Fidel Gonzalez – City of Bakersfield Page 9 of 11
March 20, 2026
QK will draft the NOE and submit it to the City for review. We assume that the City staff will post the NOE with the State Clearinghouse (SCH) online portal and the Kern County Clerk. This fee does not include the $50 fee to post with the Kern County Clerk. If the City requests our assistance, QK can help post the CEQA document on the SCH online portal. We assume one (1) round of comments.
If the City receives any comments regarding the use of this exemption, a full environmental review may be necessary.
At that time, QK can provide a contract amendment with a scope of services and the cost to complete that work.
Deliverable:
• NOE in PDF format
TASK 4.3 PRE-CONSTRUCTION CLEARANCE SURVEY
QK will conduct a pre-construction clearance survey of the proposed Project site and the 50-foot buffer area (where feasible) to document existing site conditions. Based on the location of the Project site, the survey will focus on the identification of San Joaquin kit fox, western burrowing owl, and other special-status species with the potential to occur on the proposed Project site. The survey will confirm habitat, other wildlife, etc., that may be on the Project site.
After the pre-construction clearance survey is completed, QK will prepare and submit a memo that identifies any biological resources identified during the survey. The memo will be submitted to the City within one (1) day of the survey.
Deliverable:
• A memo report in PDF format
TASK 4.4 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES TRAINING
A qualified, approved QK biologist will provide one (1), one (1)-hour San Joaquin kit fox and Bird Protection training for the contractor, subcontractor, and the contractor's representatives at the Project site. This training will include a discussion of the rules, regulations, and conditions of the California and Federal Endangered Species Acts as they pertain specifically to the San Joaquin kit fox and those special provisions under Section 14-6.03 “Bird Protection” of the Standard Specifications. The biologist will discuss the potential for the San Joaquin kit fox to occur on-site and the legal consequences of non-compliance. A hard copy of the training will be provided to the construction crew along with additional sign-in sheets.
Deliverables:
• A hard copy of the training
• A scanned copy of the sign-in attendance sheet in PDF format will be emailed
SCHEDULE
Phase/Task Description Duration
Phase 1.0 Preliminary Phase
Task 1.1 Project Coordination and Management Ongoing
Task 1.2 Topographic Survey 30 days
Task 1.3 Community Engagement 5 months*
Task 1.4 Park Design Concept Alternatives and Final Concept Plan 5 months* Task 1.5 Geotechnical Investigation 30 days*
Phase 2.0 Design Phase
Task 2.1 Design Development – 30% Submittal 1 month
Task 2.2 Construction Documents (PS&E) -75% and 100% Submittal 6 months Task 2.3 CASp Review 2 days
Task 2.4 Electrical and Lighting Plans 3 months*
Task 2.5 Structural Engineering Services 3 months*
Task 2.6 Stormwater Pollution and Prevention Plan (SWPPP) 5 days Fidel Gonzalez – City of Bakersfield Page 10 of 11
March 20, 2026
Phase/Task Description Duration
Phase 3.0 Bidding Phase
Task 3.1 Bidding Support Services 120 days
Phase 4.0 Construction Phase
Task 4.1 Construction Technical Support 365 days
Task 4.2 CEQA Notice of Exemption (NOE) 1 day
Task 4.3 Pre-construction Clearance Survey 2 days
Task 4.4 Threatened and Endangered Species Training 1 day Total Duration 28 months
* To be completed concurrently with other tasks.
FEE ESTIMATE
The tasks listed in the scope of services above will be billed on either a T&M, Not to Exceed (NTE) or Fixed Fee (FF) basis, per the proposal request from the City, and as shown in the following table.
Phase /Task Description Fee Type Fee Amount
Phase 1.0 Preliminary Phase
Task 1.1 Project Coordination and Management FF $30,500 Task 1.2 Topographic Survey FF $30,900
Task 1.3 Community Engagement FF $43,600
Task 1.4 Park Design Concept Alternatives and Final Concept Plan FF $48,000 Task 1.5 Geotechnical Investigation FF $9,500
Phase 2.0 Design Phase
Task 2.1 Design Development – 30% Submittal FF $37,500
Task 2.2 Construction Documents (PS&E) -75% and 100% Submittal FF $150,700 Task 2.3 CASp Review FF $1,200
Task 2.4 Electrical and Lighting Plans FF $16,100
Task 2.5 Structural Engineering Services FF $14,400
Task 2.6 Stormwater Pollution and Prevention Plan (SWPPP) FF $6,100 Phase 3.0 Bidding Phase
Task 3.1 Bidding Support Services T&M, NTE $23,200
Phase 4.0 Construction Phase
Task 4.1 Construction Technical Support T&M, NTE $62,900 Task 4.2 CEQA Notice of Exemption (NOE) T&M, NTE $1,500 Task 4.3 Preconstruction Clearance Survey T&M, NTE $2,500 Task 4.4 Threatened and Endangered Species Training T&M, NTE $900 Total Estimated Fee $479,500
Notes:
1. Expenses for reproduction, mailing, mileage, etc., are billed per our attached Charge Rate Schedule.
2. Fees are based on the scope and assumptions outlined. Changes in scope, schedule, or regulatory requirements may require additional services.
3. All time-and-materials fees will be invoiced monthly based on the level of effort in terms of hours relative to our Charge Rate Schedule.
4. When a Task is set on a time-and-materials fee basis, it signifies that it is not possible to accurately predict the amount of work effort required, typical of on-call type services. QK will work with the client to set expectations where applicable.
5. Tasks billed by fixed fees will be invoiced monthly based on the percentage of work completed.
6. Additional Services requested in writing and approved by the client will be provided on a time-and-materials basis.
7. The Fee Estimate is good for a period of 90 days from the date of the proposal. After 90 days, the Fee Estimate is subject to change.
8. Fees for field surveying activities are subject to the payment of Prevailing Wages for Kern County.
EXCLUSIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS
• Any service not specifically identified herein is excluded from this proposal. • Unforeseen site conditions, such as subsurface conditions, hazardous materials, or undocumented utilities, are excluded.
• Discovery or removal procedures for hazardous waste, wells, underground tanks, or archaeological artifacts.
Fidel Gonzalez – City of Bakersfield Page 11 of 11
March 20, 2026
• Off-site or street improvement plans are excluded.
• Sports field lighting design/plans are excluded.
• Permit, plan checking, inspection, and other agencies' fees, including utility services/connection and application fees, are excluded.
• Coordination with agencies beyond those specified in this proposal is excluded. • Any/all environmental documents (Environmental Impact Report, Negative Declaration Statement, etc.) are excluded.
• Tree Survey and/or Arborist services are excluded.
• SWPPP monitoring by a Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) and Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) is excluded.
• We understand the City is seeking funds for the construction phase of the project. QK requests the opportunity to revisit the scope of services and fee estimate for this phase prior to commencement of work. • Full-time Construction Administration/Observation, including daily construction inspection services, is excluded. Our scope assumes construction administration as needed by the City. • All compaction and material testing (i.e., concrete cylinder testing, etc.) and special inspections during construction are excluded.
• Irrigation auditing services are excluded.
• Any required preliminary title reports and/or underlying documents will be provided by the City. • Record of Survey, corner records, re-establishment of property corners, construction staking, and related land surveying services not specifically included in the scope of services proposed herein are not included in this proposal.
• We assume that the City staff will post the NOE with the SCH online portal and the Kern County Clerk. The fee for Task 4.2 does not include the $50 fee to post with the Kern County Clerk. If the City requests our assistance, QK can help post the CEQA document on the SCH online portal.
AUTHORIZATION OF SERVICES
To authorize the services described herein, please send us an Agreement. Typically, we can begin our services within five (5) business days of the time authorization is received, depending on the client’s needs and schedule constraints.
Thank you for the opportunity to propose on this Project. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this proposal further, please contact Cathy Williams at (661) 616-2600. We are prepared to begin services promptly upon authorization and look forward to supporting the City in this important community asset.
Sincerely,
Cathy Williams, PE, QSD/QSP, ENV SP Amber Aguayo
Branch Manager - Bakersfield CFO/COO
Enclosures: Charge Rate Schedule
Project Team Resumes & Experience
P260157
MG/CW/GH/JM/BW/AA
Charge Rate Schedule
CATHY WILLIAMS
PE, QSD | QSP, ENV SP
Principal-in-Charge
GREG HAUSER PLA, ASLA
Project Manager
JOHN McGEE
LLA, CLARB
Senior Landscape
Architect
REBEKAH GODETT
PE
Lead Engineer
BRANDON WALKER
PLS
Lead Land Surveyor
GREG THOMPSON
PE, QSD | QSP, CASp
Construction Support
Lead
PROJECT TEAM RESUMES & EXPERIENCE
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
PROPOSAL FOR HERSHEL MOORE PARK (Project #25RP0003)
Engineering | Land Surveying | Planning | Environmental | Landscape Architecture | Construction Management qkinc.com 2 CATHY WILLIAMS, PE, QSD | QSP, ENV SP
Role: Principal-in-Charge
EXPERIENCE
QK Tenure
Industry Tenure
16 years
29 years
LICENSES
Professional Engineer - Civil
California - No. 75489
CERTIFICATIONS
Qualified SWPPP Developer
Qualified SWPPP Practitioner
California Stormwater Quality
Association, No. 22393
Envision Sustainability Professional
Institute for Sustainable
Infrastructure
EDUCATION
B.S. Civil Engineering
San Diego State University
AFFILIATIONS
American Council of Engineering
Companies
American Society of Civil Engineers
Greater Bakersfield Chamber of
Commerce
Home Builders Association
Cathy steps into the Principal-in-Charge role with a civil engineering career spanning both public agency work and complex private development, bringing a rare dual fluency: the technical depth to understand every discipline on the team and the institutional knowledge to navigate the regulatory and municipal landscape of the City of Bakersfield.
Her background in grading, drainage, water quality, and utility design means she engages with the Hershel Moore scope not just as an executive overseer but as a technical peer to the engineers delivering it. As QK’s Director of Land Development and Education Markets, Cathy has steered multidisciplinary teams through high-stakes, multi-phase projects where quality, schedule, and budget are non-negotiable, exactly the standard this Project demands.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Kovacevich Park – Field of Dreams
Principal-in-Charge
City of Arvin | Arvin, CA
H Street Improvements (SR 58-SR 204)
Principal-in-Charge | Project Manager
City of Bakersfield | Bakersfield, CA
Belle Terrace Park Improvements
Project Manager
County of Kern | Bakersfield, CA
North Shafter Community Park Development
Project Manager
Wynn Smith Landscape Architects, Inc. | Shafter, CA
Riverstone Town Center
Principal-in-Charge | Project Manager
Lennar | Madera, CA
Bakersfield College Agriculture Building
Principal Engineer
TETER, Inc. | Bakersfield, CA
CSU Bakersfield Energy Innovation Building
Principal-in-Charge | Project Manager
AC Martin | Bakersfield, CA
3 GREG HAUSER, PLA, ASLA
Role: Project Manager
EXPERIENCE
QK Tenure
Industry Tenure
19 years
39 years
LICENSES
Professional Landscape Architect
American Society of Landscape
Architects - No. 3757
EDUCATION
B.S. Landscape Architecture
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo
AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Landscape
Architects
California Parks + Recreation Society
Landscape Architecture Department
Advisory Council, CalPoly SLO
RELEVANT EXPERTISE
Parks and Recreation Design +
Master Planning
Streetscape + Median Improvements
Residential Community Landscape
Design
Educational Facility Landscape
Design
Community Facilitation + Public
Engagement
As Project Manager for Hershel Moore Park, Greg brings the full weight of his landscape architecture expertise to leading a multidisciplinary team through every phase of this Project. Greg coordinates across civil engineering, land surveying, construction support, and specialty subconsultants in electrical, geotechnical, and structural disciplines, providing the integrated oversight a large neighborhood park of this complexity demands.
His deep background in parks and recreation design, community facilitation, and public engagement positions him to guide the City’s three community input meetings and translate resident feedback into a design that serves Bakersfield’s full range of users. With proven experience managing projects from programming and master planning through PS&E and construction administration, Greg brings the continuity of leadership and budget discipline this Project requires from kickoff through completion.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Fruitridge Community Park
Project Manager
Southgate Recreation + Park District | Fruitridge, CA
Heron Landing Community Park
Project Manager
City of Rancho Cordova | Rancho Cordova, CA
Grandpark Specific Plan Preliminary Landscape Design
Project Manager
City of Sacramento | Sacramento, CA
Nicholas Park
Project Manager
City of Sacramento | Sacramento, CA
Sacramento Northern Bike Trail Enhancements
Project Manager
City of Sacramento | Sacramento, CA
Rio Del Oro Master Planned Community
Project Manager
Elliott Homes | Rancho Cordova, CA
The Parkway
Project Manager
Sacramento County | Sacramento, CA
Natomas Park
Project Manager
Sacramento County | Sacramento, CA
4 JOHN MCGEE, LLA, PLA, CLARB
Role: Senior Landscape Architect
EXPERIENCE
QK Tenure
Industry Tenure
5 years
31 years
LICENSES
Licensed Landscape Architect
California - No. 4454
Missouri - No. 2025011285
CERTIFICATIONS
Council of Landscape Architectural
Registration Board
No. 5915
EDUCATION
B.S. Landscape Architecture
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Landscape
Architects
RELEVANT EXPERTISE
Parks + Recreation Design
Sports Complex, Athletic Facility, and
Pickleball Court Landscape Design
Park Master Planning
Irrigation Rehabilitation + Design
Community + Stakeholder
Engagement
John brings a design sensibility that balances aesthetic vision with the practical realities of municipal park delivery. His portfolio spanning parks and recreation, urban infill, and downtown revitalization reflects the breadth of experience needed to thoughtfully program a neighborhood park like Hershel Moore for the full range of users Bakersfield envisions.
John’s collaborative, stakeholder-centered approach is a natural fit for a project with three community engagement meetings built into the schedule. He finds his greatest satisfaction in creating spaces that serve real community needs, and brings particular passion to projects, like this one, that invest directly in the quality of life for underserved communities.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Kovacevich Park – Field of Dreams
Senior Landscape Architect
City of Arvin | Arvin, CA
MLK Park Extension Design
Senior Landscape Architect
City of Delano | Delano, CA
Exeter Parks + Recreation Master Plan
Senior Landscape Architect
City of Exeter | Exeter, CA
Porterville Sports Complex Baseball Field
Senior Landscape Architect
City of Porterville | Porterville, CA
Bakersfield College Agriculture Building
Senior Landscape Architect
TETER, Inc. | Bakersfield, CA
CSU Bakersfield Energy Innovation Building
Senior Landscape Architect
AC Martin | Bakersfield, CA
Skypark Tot Lot Replacement
Lead Landscape Architect
City of Scotts Valley | Scotts Valley, CA
City of Selma Parks Master Plan
Senior Landscape Architect
City of Selma | Selma, CA
Rotary East Park Pickleball Court
Senior Landscape Architect
City of Fresno | Fresno, CA
5 REBEKAH GODETT, PE
Role: Lead Engineer
EXPERIENCE
QK Tenure
Industry Tenure
21 years
21 years
LICENSES
Professional Engineer - Civil
California - No. 82845
EDUCATION
B.S. Civil Engineering
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo
AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineers
Society of Hispanic Professional
Engineers
RELEVANT EXPERTISE
Site Grading + Drainage Design
Stormwater Management
Construction Documents + PS&E
Public Works Infrastructure
AutoCAD Production Management
Engineering a 12-acre neighborhood park from the ground up demands someone who can move fluidly across disciplines, and Rebekah is exactly that engineer.
Her expertise spanning roadway design, water systems, sewer networks, and storm drainage gives her an instinctive command of the utility coordination, site grading, and stormwater management challenges that will define the Hershel Moore design process.
As Lead Engineer, Rebekah brings not just technical depth but an exacting precision to construction documentation that shows up in every plan set she produces. Her role as one of QK’s AutoCAD group leaders means the PS&E deliverables for this Project benefit from a quality standard she sets and enforces across the team. Sharp, collaborative, and deeply invested in getting the details right, Rebekah is the technical backbone of QK’s delivery on this Project.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Kovacevich Park – Field of Dreams
Senior Engineer
City of Arvin | Arvin, CA
MLK Park Extension Design
Senior Engineer
City of Delano | Delano, CA
Belle Terrace Park Improvements
Senior Engineer
County of Kern | Bakersfield, CA
North Shafter Community Park Development
Senior Engineer
Wynn Smith Landscape Architects, Inc. | Shafter, CA
Bakersfield College Agriculture Building
Senior Engineer
TETER, Inc. | Bakersfield, CA
CSU Bakersfield Energy Innovation Building
Senior Engineer
AC Martin | Bakersfield, CA
Farmersville SR 198 Gateway Beautification Project
Senior Engineer
City of Farmersville | Farmersville, CA
Riverstone Town Center
Senior Engineer
Lennar | Madera, CA
H Street Improvements (SR 58-SR 204)
Senior Engineer
City of Bakersfield | Bakersfield, CA
6 BRANDON WALKER, PLS
Role: Lead Land Surveyor
EXPERIENCE
QK Tenure
Industry Tenure
22 years
41 years
LICENSES
Professional Land Surveyor
California - No. 8832
EDUCATION
B.A. Business Administration &
Management
University of Phoenix
AFFILIATIONS
California Land Surveyors
Association, Bakersfield Chapter
RELEVANT EXPERTISE
Boundary Surveys
Topographic Surveys
Construction Surveys
ALTA Surveys
Lot Line Adjustments
Parcel Map Waivers
Legal Descriptions
Construction Staking + Calculations
Topographic surveying is one of the first and most foundational tasks on the Hershel Moore Project, and Brandon brings exactly the field-rooted expertise that sets a survey up for success. With extensive experience across topographic, boundary, and control surveys, he delivers the precise base data that every downstream design decision, from grading to utility layout to site programming, depends on.
Brandon’s construction staking background adds particular value on a project that runs through a full construction phase. He understands what contractors need in the field and works proactively to anticipate challenges before they surface, a practical advantage on a public project with a firm completion schedule and community visibility.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Belle Terrace Park Improvements
Senior Land Surveyor
County of Kern | Bakersfield, CA
North Shafter Community Park Development
Senior Land Surveyor
Wynn Smith Landscape Architects, Inc. | Shafter, CA
Bakersfield College Agriculture Building
Senior Land Surveyor
TETER, Inc. | Bakersfield, CA
Porterville Sports Complex Baseball Field
Senior Land Surveyor
City of Porterville | Porterville, CA
H Street Improvements (SR 58-SR 204)
Senior Land Surveyor
City of Bakersfield | Bakersfield, CA
Bakersfield College Agriculture Building
Senior Land Surveyor
TETER, Inc. | Bakersfield, CA
CSU Bakersfield Energy Innovation Building
Senior Land Surveyor
AC Martin | Bakersfield, CA
MLK Park Extension Design
Senior Land Surveyor
City of Delano | Delano, CA
7 GREG THOMPSON, PE, QSD/QSP, CASp
Role: Construction Support Lead
EXPERIENCE
QK Tenure
Industry Tenure
11 years
30 years
LICENSES
Professional Engineer - Civil
California, No. 63219
CERTIFICATIONS
California Certified Access Specialist
Certified Access Specialist Institute,
No. CASp-800
Qualified SWPPP Developer/
Qualified SWPPP Practitioner
California Stormwater Quality
Association, No. 00501
EDUCATION
M.Eng. Construction Engineering
Management
University of British Columbia
B.A.Sc Civil Engineering
University of Waterloo
AFFILIATIONS
American Public Works Association
RELEVANT EXPERTISE
Construction Management + QA/QC
ADA Compliance + CASp Certification
Public Works Construction
Contract Delivery + Administration
Greg brings a career built at the intersection of civil engineering and construction management, with hands-on experience across public works, municipal, and parks and recreation projects. He thrives in the coordination-heavy environment of the bidding and construction phases, consistently building productive working relationships between contractors, owners, and agencies that keep projects moving and on track.
Greg’s certification as a Certified Access Specialist (CASp) adds a valuable layer of oversight to the Hershel Moore Project, where ADA-accessible walkways and inclusive design are core to the City’s vision. His ability to translate accessibility requirements into practical, buildable outcomes means compliance is woven into the construction process from the start, not addressed as an afterthought.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Kovacevich Park – Field of Dreams
ADA/CASp Lead + Construction Manager
City of Arvin | Arvin, CA
MLK Park Extension Design
ADA/CASp Lead + Construction Manager
City of Delano | Delano, CA
Exeter Parks + Recreation Master Plan
ADA/CASp Lead
City of Exeter | Exeter, CA
Belle Terrace Park Improvements
ADA/CASp Lead + Construction Manager
County of Kern | Bakersfield, CA
Bakersfield College Agriculture Building
ADA/CASp Lead + Construction Manager
TETER, Inc. | Bakersfield, CA
Porterville Sports Complex Baseball Field
Senior Construction Manager
City of Porterville | Porterville, CA
Farmersville SR 198 Gateway Beautification Project
Senior Construction Manager
City of Farmersville | Farmersville, CA
Los Banos Animal Shelter Rehabilitation
Senior Construction Manager
City of Los Banos | Los Banos, CA
8 KOVACEVICH PARK “FIELD OF DREAMS AND BASEBALL TEAMS”
ARVIN, CA
OWNER
City of Arvin
DATES
Start Date
Completion Date
February 2023
August 2024
QK’S SCOPE
Civil Engineering Environmental Planning
Construction Management Landscape Architecture
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Arvin won a $1,956,575 grant from Parks for All Californians to renovate and improve Kovacevich Park. The Field of Dreams project includes focused rehabilitation of the existing park and consists of developing concept plans, construction plans, and bid documents for the improvements. QK is producing improvement plans based on site amenity selection, play structure selection, site improvement cost estimates, and specifications, and will provide bidding and construction for the improvements. Our services include removing and replacing sections of the existing baseball and tee-ball fields, playground area, and basketball court. Park amenities and the parking lot will be improved and renovated, along with a topographic site survey of the park site.
APPLICABILITY TO HERSHEL MOORE PARK PROJECT
Kovacevich Park mirrors the Hershel Moore scope in several key ways: multi-amenity site design, phased PS&E deliverables, topographic surveying, and full bidding and construction support. QK’s experience navigating a grant-funded municipal park from concept through closeout demonstrates the fiscal accountability and phased delivery discipline (Preliminary through Construction) that Project #25RP0003 requires. Working within a fixed grant budget also sharpened QK’s approach to cost estimating and scope prioritization, skills directly applicable to a project where the City has noted construction timing may depend on funding availability.
9 MLK PARK EXTENSION DESIGN
DELANO, CA
OWNER
City of Delano
DATES
Start Date
Completion Date
October 2022
August 2025
QK’S SCOPE
Civil Engineering Land Use Planning
Landscape Architecture Public Outreach
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The extension is approximately 2.5 acres and will be attached to the south of the existing MLK Park. The other half of the parcel is currently being constructed with multifamily housing by the Housing Authority of Kern County (HAKC).
Currently, Pop Warner football teams practice at MLK, and the City envisions the new park to be used for active recreation, including exercise equipment and a walking/ jogging path around the site. The Project consisted of developing a concept plan, construction plans, and bid documents for park improvements. QK produced improvement plans based on the City’s preferred concept selection, cost estimates, and specifications, and will provide bidding and construction support for the improvements.
APPLICABILITY TO HERSHEL MOORE PARK PROJECT
MLK Park Extension directly parallels the active recreation programming at the heart of Hershel Moore Park. QK’s experience designing fitness equipment areas and a walking/jogging path, both explicitly called out in the City’s anticipated park elements, demonstrates hands-on familiarity with the amenity types Bakersfield envisions for this site. The full PS&E delivery model, from concept selection through construction documents, specifications, cost estimates, and bidding support, reflects the same phased structure the City is requesting here. Coordinating design on a site adjacent to active multifamily construction also required careful attention to site boundaries, utilities, and phasing considerations that translate well to a greenfield park development like Hershel Moore.
10 QK’S SCOPE
Land Use Planning Landscape Architecture
Public Outreach
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
QK worked with the City of Exeter to prepare a comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan to guide the City’s park system and recreation programs over the next 15 years. The Master Plan established a clear vision, goals, and phased objectives for improving and maintaining parks, enhancing accessibility, and expanding recreational opportunities throughout the community. QK’s scope included compiling and analyzing base data, coordinating with City staff and the Exeter Unified School District, leading public engagement meetings, and developing exhibits, maps, and renderings to support the plan’s recommendations.
The Master Plan addressed priorities such as ADA compliance, safety improvements, efficient use of park space, maintenance needs, and identification of funding sources for future enhancements. As part of this effort, QK prepared a conceptual design for Exeter City Park, highlighting opportunities for upgraded amenities, improved circulation, and community gathering spaces, which can be seen on the following page. Through this collaboration, QK helped the City create a practical and forward-looking roadmap for sustainable, accessible, and vibrant parks and recreation facilities.
APPLICABILITY TO HERSHEL MOORE PARK PROJECT
QK’s work leading public engagement meetings, translating community feedback into design recommendations, and developing concept-level exhibits directly mirrors the three community engagement meetings central to the Hershel Moore scope. Experience prioritizing ADA compliance, accessibility, and phased improvements within funding constraints rounds out the relevance to this project.
EXETER PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN
EXETER, CA
CHILDREN'S POOL
WATER ADVENTURE
SCALE: 1" = 50'
CITY PARK - MASTER PLAN
OPEN AIR SPACE
AREA FOR SPECIAL EVENTS,
LIGHTING, SEAT WALLS, ELECTRICAL
SERVICE, AND ADA PATH OF TRAVEL
CHILDREN'S POOL WATER ADVENTURE
HISTORICAL BRIDGE AND TRELLIS
(PARENT SEATING AREA), SPLASH
PLAY EQUIPMENT, AND COLORFUL
SAFETY SURFACING
CONCERTS IN THE PARK
NEW AMPHITHEATER, AUDIO, AND
ELECTRICAL SERVICE
DROUGHT TOLERANT GARDEN
WATER WISE LANDSCAPE
SENIOR EVENT AREA
INFORMAL SEATING AREAS AND
HISTORICAL SITE FURNISHINGS
PLAYLAND
EXPAND PLAY SURFACING TO NEW
FENCE, ADDITIONAL SURFACE PLAY
EVENTS, PARENT SEATING WITH
SHADE, AND PERIMETER FENCING
HORSE SHOE AREA
REHABILITATION OF HORSE SHOE
COURTS, NEW CORN HOLE COURTS,
AND NEW SEATING AREA WITH SHADE
RESTROOMS
RESTROOMS, STORAGE, AND PUMP
HOUSE FOR POOL EQUIPMENT
CONCERTS IN
THE PARK
(NEW
AMPHITHEATER)
OPEN AIR SPACE
PLAYLAND
ADA
ACCESSIBLE
SWINGS
HORSE SHOE
AREA
NEW
FENCING
RESTROOMS
SHADED
SEATING
AREA SHADED
SEATING
AREA
SHADED
SEATING
AREA BRIDGE
AND
TRELLIS
PUMP
EQUIPMENT
EXISTING
SEATING
AREA
EXISTING
SEATING
AREA
E. CEDAR ST.
T.
S. E ST.
CORN HOLE
COURTS
INTERNAL PATHWAYS / TRAIL
~1,800 LF OF NEW WALKWAYS WITH
ADA COMPLIANCE AT MAIN SPINE
BIKE TRAIL STATION
BIKE EQUIPMENT STATION ALONG
PROPOSED CLASS III BIKE TRAIL
EXPAND PLAY
SURFACE
12' WIDE MAINTENANCE ACCESS
REMODEL
PICNIC
AREA
ADA PARKING
OWNER
City of Exeter
DATES
Start Date
Completion Date
August 2024
September 2025
PARK MASTER PLAN
Goals and policies development
Needs assessment
Service area recommendations
Restructuring of parks’ classifications
Trends analysis
Funding opportunities
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent Calendar Public Hearing TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Randy McKeegan, Finance Director
DATE: April 8, 2026
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider Resolution adopting fees pursuant to the cost recovery system and approving the Master Fee Schedule.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.
BACKGROUND:
State law requires new fees, charges, and increases in existing fees and charges to be adopted by ordinance or resolution following a public hearing on said fees and charges. Chapter 3.70 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code (BMC) authorizes the establishment and increase of fees and charges by resolution for the City. In accordance with Chapter 3.70 of the BMC, the adoption of new and increased fees and charges is necessary for the City to recover the reasonable estimated cost of providing the services for which the fees are charged.
City staff completed a full review of the master fee schedule in May 2021. Supplementary updates of fees and language to the last fee schedule were approved in April 2023, April 2024, and April 2025 based on increases to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) those respective years. That same review based on CPI is being applied in the current year with additional fees detailed below.
The attached resolution along with Exhibit A represents the entire master fee schedule document to be authorized. The first column of numbers lists the current fees in place, and the second column or numbers are the proposed fees for the upcoming fiscal year.
Each department completed a full review of fees that included a thorough examination of the related time spent and materials used by staff. The majority of the fees increased based on changes in the consumer price index for the Los Angeles, Long Beach, & Anaheim region, which results in increases between 3% and 4%. This review also included updates to the administrative overhead rates which recover costs of supporting divisions within the City, which includes Technology Services, City Attorney, Finance, and Human Resources. This review was consistent with budget instructions, which requested that departments review their fees to verify full cost recovery. The council has historically supported fees at or near 100% cost recovery for most charges, except for some recreation and parks program activities.
Thes fees are subsidized by the General Fund, which has been the City’s continued practice for many years to benefit underserved communities that utilize those services.
The proposed fee schedule also includes fees updated for service needs and programs. This includes new activity for economic and community development, development services, fire protection services, recreation & parks, and water services. There are also updates to the schedule to include fees that were omitted from the document but should be added to have a more complete and accurate record of City Fees. Explanations for these additions are detailed below. Also included in the explanations below are fees that are increasing or decreasing by material amounts for reasons other than the change in fringe and overhead rates.
Economic and Community Development has added back and updated section B-41 since it was removed in error during the last review of the Master Fee Schedule.
The proposed changes were deemed necessary to align with rising operational costs, including salary adjustments per the current salary schedule and increased expenditures for program service and delivery.
The adjustment ensures financial stability while maintaining compliance with budgetary requirements.
Cultural Resource Review – Cultural Resource Review Fee – B-41-1 Economic & Community Development is requesting the reinstatement of the Cultural Resource Review Fee. The application fee for historic property owners to request consideration of their property as a cultural resource and added to the Bakersfield Register of Historic Places. The services provided is application review for eligibility per City Municipal Code and process for consideration and approval with two public hearings, one at Historic Preservation Commission and one at City Council, and recordation of the designation if approved. The service provides long term preservation of the property and reduces the impact of demolition or modifications that remove historic features.
Development Services has proposed changes to existing fees in the following sections: A-1, A-2, A-3, B-42 and F-103. The proposed changes to service center A1-3 were deemed necessary to mitigate fee increases driven by higher Building Valuation Data (BVD), the fees will be either held flat or reduced. The proposed changes to B-42 are deemed necessary to recoup the cost incurred by staff to process all fees associated with the County Clerk filing. The proposed changes to F-103 are deemed necessary to gradually increase to reach the full cost recovery amount over time.
Fire Prevention Services has proposed changes to existing fees in the following sections A-1, A-8, A-9, A10, B-23, B-25, B-27, B-28, B-37, B-40, and D-75. Fee increases are required to cover salary/operating expenses within the Fire Prevention Services Division.
Fire Department Growth Fees:
1. Residential Construction – New, Additions, Alterations, Remodel or Repair – Residential Construction – Permit Processing and Inspection Fees – Fire Department Growth Fee – A-1-1
2. Residential Construction – New, Additions, Alterations, Remodel or Repair – Residential Individual Trade Permit – Electrical, Mechanical or Plumbing – Requiring Multiple Inspections or Plan Check – Fire Department Growth Fee – A-1-2
3. Commercial Construction – New, Additions, Alterations, Remodel or Repair – Commercial Construction – Permit Processing and Inspection Fees – Fire Department Growth Fee – A-2-1
4. Tentative Subdivision Map Review – Parcel Map Review – Fire Department Growth Fee – B-25-1
5. Tentative Subdivision Map Review – Revised Parcel Map Review – Fire Department Growth Fee – B-25-2
6. Tentative Subdivision Map Review – Tract Map Review – Fire Department Growth Fee – B-25-4
7. Preliminary Project Review – Development Review – Fire Department Growth Fee – B-27-4
8. Preliminary Project Review – Planned Development Review – Fire Department Growth Fee – B27-5
9. Site Plan Review – Minimum Fee – Fire Department Growth Fee – B-28-1
10. Site Plan Review – Maximum Fee – Fire Department Growth Fee – B-28-2
11. Map & Improvement Plan Checking – Final Tract Maps / Final Parcel Maps – Fire Department Growth Fee – B-37-1
Fire prevention is requesting the addition of a new fee for the above-mentioned sections. The Fire Department Growth Fee shall be imposed on new development and qualifying changes to existing development that increase demand for fire protection, emergency medical services, and related public safety infrastructure. The fee is intended to fund the expansion, enhancement and long-term sustainability of Fire Department facilities, apparatus, equipment, technology, and staffing necessary to maintain adopted response standards and service levels as the community grows. The growth fee shall be assessed for each individual dwelling unit or equivalent unit of development, including each dwelling unit within a multifamily or apartment complex, as defined in an adopted fee schedule. The fee shall be charged at the time of issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other entitlement, approval, or inspection as determined by the City. The fees shall apply to new construction, additions, or changes of use that result in increased fire service demand.
State-Mandated Fire Inspection – Fire Inspection – 1-25 Units – A-8-2 Fire prevention is requesting the addition of a new fee for 1-25 Units. This new fee covers the cost of all inspections including plan review time frame and office staff time to process permits.
State-Mandated Fire Inspection – Fire Inspection – 26-50 Units – A-8-2 Fire prevention is requesting the addition of a new fee for 26-50 Units. This new fee covers the cost of all inspections including plan review time frame and office staff time to process permits.
State-Mandated Fire Inspection – Fire Inspection – 51-100 Units – A-8-2 Fire prevention is requesting the addition of a new fee for 51-100 Units. This new fee covers the cost of all inspections including plan review time frame and office staff time to process permits.
Fire Service Fees – Lift Assist Fee – D-75-5
Fire prevention is requesting the addition of a new fee for Fire Services Fees. The lift assist fee shall be assessed for responses to facilities that are required by federal, state, or local law, regulation, license, or permit to maintain on-site staffing for the care, supervision, or assistance of occupants. The fee applies when Fire Department personnel are requested or utilized to assist in the lifting, repositioning, or movement of an occupant, and the request is not associated with a medical emergency requiring emergency medical treatment or transport. The fee is intended to recover a portion of the costs incurred by the Fire Department for personnel, apparatus, equipment usage, and unit availability, and shall not be construed as a substitute for required facility staffing, training, or equipment. Assessment of the fee does not relieve the facility of its obligation to comply with all applicable care, staffing, and safety requirements under law.
Recreation and Parks Services has proposed changes to existing fees in the following sections E-82, E-83, E-84, and E-88. All requested changes come from comprehensive research and surveys of similar fees, services and facilities in surrounding municipalities, the proposed changes reflect the current industry standards.
Park Facility Rental – Park Amenities – Tournaments (per day) – Jastro Park -Pickleball Tournament – E82-10 Recreation and Parks services is requesting the addition of a new fee for Jastro Park – Pickleball Tournament. This new fee is based on a comprehensive fee survey of similar facilities in surrounding municipalities; the proposed rate is reflective of current industry standards.
Park Facility Rental – Park Amenities – Tournaments (per day) – Beale Park -Pickleball Tournament – E82-10 Recreation and Parks services is requesting the addition of a new fee for Beale Park – Pickleball Tournament. This new fee is based on a comprehensive fee survey of similar facilities in surrounding municipalities; the proposed rate is reflective of current industry standards.
Water Resource Services has proposed changes to existing fees in section F-91. All requested changes are based on comprehensive full cost recalculation. A full cost recalculation had not been done since 2017, and the cost of labor and materials has drastically changed over the years.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of the resolution and the Master Fee Schedule will allow the departments that provide services for the city to recover costs for those various services. Significant Impact to the General Fund if the Fee Schedule is not updated to recover the costs.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Innovative and Efficient City Government
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution
2. Master Fee Schedule
RESOLUTION NO. .
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING
FEES PURSUANT TO THE
COST RECOVERY SYSTEM
WHEREAS, state law requires new fees and charges and increases in existing fees and charges be adopted by ordinance or resolution following a public hearing on said fees and charges; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 3.70 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code authorizes the establishment and increase of fees under the cost recovery system; and WHEREAS, a public hearing before the City Council was advertised twice in the Bakersfield Californian, a newspaper of general circulation, and held on April 22, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit “A” including attached hereto and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein, do not exceed the reasonable estimated cost of providing the services for which the fees are charged.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Bakersfield as follows:
1. The above recitals and findings are true and correct.
2. The fees set forth in Exhibit “A” of the Master Fee Schedule are hereby, Adopted and shall become effective according to the following schedule:
a. Fee changes will be effective July 1, 2026
--------------oOo--------------
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution/Ordinance was passed and adopted, by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on ______________________________ by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBER ARIAS, GONZALES, WEIR, SMITH, KOMAN, BASHIRTASH, KAUR NOES: COUNCILMEMBER _______________________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER _______________________________________________________________ ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER ______________________________________________________________ _
________________________________
JULIE DRIMAKIS, MMC
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of
the Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED: _________________
By __________________________
KAREN GOH
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By _________________________
VIRGINIA GENNARO
City Attorney
Attachment
Exhibit “A”
A - INSPECTION FEES & SERVICES
A-1 NEW RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION …………………………………………………………………………………… 3 A-2 RESIDENTIAL ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR …………………………………………………………………………………… 4 A-3 COMMERCIAL ADDITION, ALTERATION, REMODEL OR REPAIR …………………………………………………………………………………… 4 A-4 SPECIAL RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION …………………………………………………………………………………… 5 A-5 STREET CUT INSPECTION …………………………………………………………………………………… 7 A-6 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION …………………………………………………………………………………… 7 A-7 STREET ENCROACHMENT INSPECTION …………………………………………………………………………………… 8 A-8 STATE-MANDATED FIRE INSPECTION …………………………………………………………………………………… 8 A-9 OIL WELL INSPECTION (ANNUAL) …………………………………………………………………………………… 8 A-10 FIRE SAFETY REVIEW/INSPECTION …………………………………………………………………………………… 9 A-12 REINSPECTION OF MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATIONS …………………………………………………………………………………… 10 A-14 SIGNS - PERMIT PROCESSING AND INSPECTION FEES …………………………………………………………………………………… 10 A-15 WIRELESS FACILITIES RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT …………………………………………………………………………………… 10
B - LAND USE REVIEW / PERMITS
B-20 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL/COMPLIANCE FEE …………………………………………………………………………………… 11 B-21 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT …………………………………………………………………………………… 11 B-22 HOME OCCUPATION REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 11 B-23 FIRE SPRINKLER AND ALARM …………………………………………………………………………………… 11 B-25 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 13 B-26 MINOR LAND DIVISION REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 14 B-27 PRELIMINARY PROJECT REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 14 B-28 SITE PLAN REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 15 B-29 SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 15 B-30 PUD OR PCD ZONE CHANGE …………………………………………………………………………………… 15 B-31 ZONE CHANGE REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 16 B-32 APPEAL PROCESSING …………………………………………………………………………………… 16 B-33 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 16 B-34 CONCURRENT APPLICATION GPA/ZONE CHANGE …………………………………………………………………………………… 16 B-35 ZONE MODIFICATION REVIEW - MODIFICATIONS …………………………………………………………………………………… 16 B-36 SIGN REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 16
B-37 MAP & IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKING …………………………………………………………………………………… 16 B-38 DEVELOPMENT TIME EXTENSION REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 18 B-39 TRAFFIC MARKING REQUEST REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 18 B-40 CERTIFIED UNIFIED PROGRAM AGENCY (CUPA) FEES …………………………………………………………………………………… 18 B-41 CULTURAL RESOURCE REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 20 B-42 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 21 B-43 HISTORIC DISTRICT REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 21 B-44 WIDE/OVERLOAD REVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………… 21 B-45 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE REQUIREMENTS …………………………………………………………………………………… 21
C - PUBLIC INFORMATION SERVICES
C-51 FIRE REPORT COPY …………………………………………………………………………………… 21 C-52 POLICE RECORDING DUPLICATION SERVICE …………………………………………………………………………………… 22 C-53 POLICE PHOTOGRAPH COPY …………………………………………………………………………………… 22 C-54 DOCUMENT PRINTING AND COPYING …………………………………………………………………………………… 22 C-55 REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS …………………………………………………………………………………… 22 C-56 RESEARCH AND CERTIFICATIONS …………………………………………………………………………………… 23 C-57 AGENDA/MINUTE MAILING SERVICE …………………………………………………………………………………… 23 C-58 MUNICIPAL CODE SUPPLEMENT …………………………………………………………………………………… 23
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2026-27
EXHIBIT "A"
1 of 41 4/14/2026
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
PROPOSED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2026-27
EXHIBIT "A"
D - PUBLIC SAFETY
D-61 BUSINESS REGULATION …………………………………………………………………………………… 23 D-62 CONCEALED WEAPON PERMIT PROCESSING …………………………………………………………………………………… 24 D-63 LIMOUSINE/TAXI/TOWING REGULATION …………………………………………………………………………………… 24 D-64 WEED ABATEMENT OR FIRE HAZARD ABATEMENT …………………………………………………………………………………… 25 D-65 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL RESPONSE …………………………………………………………………………………… 25 D-66 FIRE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE …………………………………………………………………………………… 25 D-67 POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE …………………………………………………………………………………… 25 D-68 SPECIAL EVENT SAFETY SERVICES …………………………………………………………………………………… 25 D-69 AUTOMOTIVE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION …………………………………………………………………………………… 25 D-70 FINGERPRINT SERVICE …………………………………………………………………………………… 26 D-71 VEHICLE CODE ENFORCEMENT …………………………………………………………………………………… 26 D-72 SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD SERVICE …………………………………………………………………………………… 26 D-73 PARKING ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT …………………………………………………………………………………… 26 D-74 BOARD UP OF STRUCTURES …………………………………………………………………………………… 26 D-75 FIRE SERVICE FEES …………………………………………………………………………………… 26 D-76 ANIMAL CONTROL FEES …………………………………………………………………………………… 28
E - RECREATION / CULTURAL
E-82 PARK FACILITY RENTAL …………………………………………………………………………………… 28 E-83 RECREATION CENTER RENTAL …………………………………………………………………………………… 32 E-84 CITY ADULT PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES …………………………………………………………………………………… 33 E-85 CITY YOUTH PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES …………………………………………………………………………………… 35 E-86 AQUATIC PROGRAMS - RECREATIONAL SWIMMING …………………………………………………………………………………… 36 E-87 LEISURE CLASSES …………………………………………………………………………………… 38 E-88 AMPHITHEATRE FEES - THE PARK AT RIVER WALK …………………………………………………………………………………… 38
F - MISCELLANEOUS FEES
F-90 HEARINGS AND APPEALS …………………………………………………………………………………… 39 F-91 FIRE HYDRANT DISTRIBUTION AND INSTALLATION INSPECTION …………………………………………………………………………………… 39 F-92 DOCUMENT IMAGING …………………………………………………………………………………… 40 F-93 PROCESSING SCHOOL FACILITY FEES …………………………………………………………………………………… 40 F-94 COMPUTER DATA …………………………………………………………………………………… 40
F-95 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FEES …………………………………………………………………………………… 40 F-97 RETURN CHECK CHARGE …………………………………………………………………………………… 40 F-98 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER RENTAL …………………………………………………………………………………… 40 F-99 BROADCAST CHARGES FOR CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS …………………………………………………………………………………… 40 F-100 BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING FEES …………………………………………………………………………………… 41 F-101 FOOD VENDING VEHICLE FEES …………………………………………………………………………………… 41 F-102 BLUE STAR MILITARY BANNER PROGRAM …………………………………………………………………………………… 41 F-103 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES …………………………………………………………………………………… 41 2 of 41 4/14/2026
7/1/2026 Unit / 4/23/2025 Proposed Proposed
Proposed Additional Adopted $ Increase %Increase
Fees Fee Notes/Comments Fees (Decrease) (Decrease)
Building Permits 54%
All construction (including: new, additional, alteration, remodel, repair, and other construction) for both
residential and commercial construction permit
processing, services, and inspection fees are calculated as follows: Two general methods are used to calculate
fees in service centers A1, A2, A3, and A4. The use of a flat fee and the use of the estimated regional market
value of the proposed construction multiplied by a "fee factor." These methods represent the estimated cost of
providing all plan review and various inspection fees
required for the project. Valuation data is based upon the February 2026 building valuation data (BVD). Alterations & Remodels will be valued at $82 per square foot or by an official contract approved by the Building Director. The revenue generated from this is then spread to the various costs center as follows: 54% N/A 0.00%
Plan Check Fees 46% 46% N/A 0.00%
A-1 Residential Construction - New, Additions, Alterations, Remodel or Repair Fees in cost center are cumulative based on the
construction value of the proposed permitted work and
include related plan review and inspections
1 Residential Construction - Permit Processing
and Inspection Fees
Valuation $1 to $40,000 291 $ Each 291 $ - $ 0.00%
Valuation $40,001 to $100,000
$ 0.0039
x
Valuation To mitigate fee increases driven by higher Building Valuation Data (BVD), the fee will be held flat.
$ 0.0056
$ -31.02% (0.0017)
Valuation $100,001 and Greater
$ 0.0039
x
Valuation To mitigate fee increases driven by higher Building Valuation Data (BVD), the fee will be held flat.
$ 0.0056
$ -31.02% (0.0017)
Fire Department Growth Fee 200 $ Each New Fee - $ 200 $ New 2 Residential Individual Trade Permit -
Electrical, Mechanical or Plumbing - Requiring
Multiple Inspections or Plan Check
Valuation $1 to $40,000 236 $ Each
To mitigate fee increases driven by higher Building
Valuation Data (BVD), the fee will be held flat. $ - 236 $ 0.00% Valuation $40,001 and Greater
$ 0.0039
x
Valuation To mitigate fee increases driven by higher Building Valuation Data (BVD), the fee will be reduced. $ (0.0017) 0.0056 $ -31.02% City of Bakersfield
Proposed Master Fee Schedule for 2026-27
For City Service Centers
Service
Center
Number
A - Inspection Fees & Services