Agenda packet — Baldwin Park City Council, May 15, 2024 (part 3 of 4)

LU 8.4: “Encourage the development of outdoor cafes, flower sales, stalls, or kiosks, and other uses which are compatible with and stimulate pedestrian activity.”

Policy –
LU 8.7: “Create an active “paseo” in the courtyard of City Hall. Provide pedestrian connections to Downtown.”

Policy –
OS&C 1.2: “Establish as a priority for funding the acquisition and development of parks and recreational facilities in neighborhoods where there are a shortage of parks.”

Specific Plan Consistency

Appellant is also incorrect when it argues that the Project is inconsistent with the City’s Downtown Specific plans.

Both the 2016 and 2022 Downtown Specific Plans contemplate the development of the Project. Development of the Project was originally undertaken in fulfillment of the vision and land use plan contained in the 2016 Downtown TOD Specific Plan (Exhibit G, pages 27- 28) which was the guiding land use document for the area that was in effect at that time the Project was conceived. The Site was designated as Mixed Use (MU -1) within the 2016 Downtown TOD Specific Plan. While the land use designation indicates mixed use development is allowed, the 2016 Downtown TOD Specific Plan allowed an option for the Site to be developed as civic plaza to celebrate the arts and community events (Exhibit G, 2016 Downtown TOD Specific Plan, pages 27, 28). This designation allowed flexibility in use type, which is why open space is one of the uses permitted by right in this land use designation (Exhibit G, Table 4-1).

In March of 2022, the City Council adopted a revised Downtown Specific Plan to replace the 2016 Downtown TOD Specific Plan. The Site is designated as Downtown Core in the 2022 Specific Plan. This designation allows for the development of a wide variety of uses. These uses include: Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly uses such as Open Space and Recreation; Retail uses such as Restaurants and Retail businesses; Accessory Commercial Uses such as Outdoor Café and Outdoor Display; Commerce, Manufacturing, and Processing uses that include Artisan manufacturing, and Warehouse; Residential Uses such as Multi -family Residential; Automobile Related Uses such as Vehicle Repair; and Service Uses such as barber shops and offices.

Further, approval of the map and development of the Project on the Site would be consistent with the 2022 Downtown Specific Plan. Specifically, and contrary to Appellant’s arguments, the Project is consistent with the below policy goals from the 2022 Downtown Specific Plan:

Policy –
P1.1: “ Expand and maintain an enhanced, interconnected system of public parks, trails and open space in Downtown area.”
Actions –
• A1.1a: “ Introduce additional public spaces, such as promenade, neighborhood and pocket parks, plazas, and parklets on public land.”
• A 1.1b: “ Enhance and connect public parks, open spaces and trails serving residents and visitors, connecting existing parks and the other Downtown assets through paseos, promenades, trails, and enhanced sidewalks.”
• A 1.1e: “Allow parklets on streets to provide visual interest and expand the useable area of the sidewalk.”

Policy –

Page 5 ends

P1.6: “Expand the inventory of publicly accessible community gathering spaces so that businesses and residents are within a short walking distance of a park or recreational area.” Actions –
• A1.6b: “Allow parklets on streets to provide visual interest and expand the useable area of the sidewalk.”

Policy –
P2.13: “Expand places and spaces where community events and festivals can occur.” Actions –
• A2.13a: “Develop the Promenade and Paseos and various parks and open spaces in the Downtown area.”

Policy –
P3.8: “Create well-designed spaces for a high-quality user experience for all modes.” Actions –
• A3.8a: “Provide streetscapes and public realms that provide safe and convenient routes for walking and biking.”
• A 3.8d: “ Reduce block lengths for shorter walking and biking distances.” • A3.8e: “Provide a diverse mix of uses that includes housing, employment, retail, and public spaces to create a vibrant urban environment
• A 3.8f: “ Incorporate pedestrian and bicycle safety into plans, programs, and designs.” • A3.8g: “ Incorporate designs that remove barriers to pedestrians, bicyclists, and persons with mobility limitation, connecting sidewalks to bus stops and pathways that do not require passing through parking areas or driveways.

Appellant’s appeal interprets the above policy objectives in an unreasonably narrow fashion. The law grants the City a lot of deference when making determinations on whether a project is consistent with specific plan or general plan. Contrary to Appellant’s assertion, the Project is consistent with all of the above policy objectives. For example, the 2022 Downtown Specific Plan calls for the expansion of public parks and open space in the Downtown area. (2022 Downtown Specific Plan, Policy 1.1) The Policy is furthered by introducing additional public spaces and plazas on public land. (Action 1.1a.) The Policy is also complimented by actions calling for the enhancement of open spaces connecting downtown assets through open spaces and enhanced sidewalks Project (Action 1.1b). The Project is consistent with these objectives. The Project calls for the construction of a public park in the downtown area on public land. Additionally, this Project is connected to other public parks already existing in the downtown area. The Project is also consistent with the other policy objectives noted above because the Project calls for the expansion of public spaces that can host community events. The Project is also plainly consistent with Policy 1.6 and 2.13 because it expands publicly accessible community gathering spaces and spaces that can host community events. Moreover, the 2016 Downtown Specific Plan specifically called for the construction of the community park.

Although the appeal claims that Maine Avenue is part of the Downtown “Core”, the 2022 Downtown Specific Plan more precisely identifies the “Core” at a section of Maine Avenue different from where the Claimants’ businesses are located. (
Id. at p. 34. [“The Downtown Core is the intersection of Ramona Boulevard and Maine Avenue...”]) The portion of Maine Avenue that is at issue here is not a core street under the 2022 Downtown Specific Plan. Furthermore, while housing could be developed in the downtown core, that is not the exclusive potential land use for the area. Furthermore, the Project does not reduce the existing housing supply. While it does reduce potential housing sites, the City has other locations that can be developed for housing.

As demonstrated above, substantial evidence supports a finding that that the Project harmonizes, is in agreement, and is consistent with the 2022 Downtown Specific Plan’s goals and policies.

Page 6 ends

PARKING AND CIRCULATION

Vehicular access to the consolidated lots and the Project will be provided via Sterling Way and Maine Avenue on the north side of the Project’s boundaries. The existing driveway on the east -west portion of Maine Avenue will be eliminated. A total of 27 parking spaces will be provided. The 2022 Specific Plan does not require parking be provided for open space uses. Nevertheless, parking spaces are provided for practical reasons so that patrons have safe and convenient ways to access the plaza. The parking required for the proposed 3,250 square foot retail space is one parking space per 200 square feet of building area, which equates to 16 parking spaces, so the 27 spaces to be provided exceed the requirement. Additional public parking is available across the street at the City Hall/Metrolink parking structure behind City Hall.

At the time that this project was conceptualized within the 2016 Downtown TOD Specific Plan, the removal of Maine Avenue between Sterling Way and Pacific Avenue was contemplated as part of the 2016 Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report. The closure of a portion of Maine Street between Sterling Way and Pacific Avenue was also studied by the City and its consultant in August 2022 (see Exhibit E). This was prior to the final design of the Project being approved by the Council. In examining this question, the analysis reviewed existing conditions, project description, project site access and circulation scheme, a project trip generation forecast, an assessment of the potential traffic effects associated with the project, a traffic control warrant assessment, as well as a parking assessment. The conclusion of this analysis was that there would be no significant impacts from this closure.

REQUIREMENTS – TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP

1. Adequate systems designed and constructed to provide all necessary utilities to each lot proposed to be created, including, but not limited to, facilities for water, natural gas, electricity, cable television and telecommunications telephone services.

The project has been designed to provide all the necessary utilities to each lot proposed to be created, including, but not limited to, facilities for water, natural gas, electricity, cable television and telecommunications service. All conditions from outside agencies and utility companies shall be met or provided for prior to finalizing the tentative parcel map.

2. An adequate domestic water distribution system designed and constructed to service each lot proposed to be created.

Valley County Water District is the purveyor in the area and water would be provided to the subject property by Valley County Water District.

3. An adequate sewage system designed and constructed to serve each lot proposed to be created.

The proposed project shall comply with any conditions of approval as imposed by the Sanitation District of Los Angeles County prior to approval of the final map by the City of Baldwin Park.

4. An adequate storm water drainage system designed and constructed to serve each lot proposed to be created.

The Public Works Department have designed the site to include the construction of storm drains to address stormwater in the area.

5. An adequate public and/or private street and/or alley system designed and constructed to serve each lot proposed to be created.

Page 7 ends

The site will be served by Sterling Way and Maine Avenue to the west and Pacific Avenue to the east. A drive aisle with parking will be created on the north side of the parking area between Sterling Way and Pacific Avenue to allow for one-way vehicular access from the west.

A traffic study was prepared on August 18, 2022 date by the City to examine the potential impact to vehicular traffic associated with the closing of the segment on Maine Avenue between Sterling Way and Pacific Avenue (see Exhibit F). The report concluded that no significant impacts to the surrounding areas would occur with the closing of this segment of road.

6. An adequate traffic regulatory system, including necessary traffic signals, signs, pavement markings and striping.

The Project scope entails the closure of a portion of Maine Avenue and minor adjustments to the roads connecting to the Project site will be necessary to create a seamless transition. A new one -way alley will be created along the northern edge of the Project and this alley will be complete with new traffic signs, striping and pavement markings.

7. The undergrounding of utilities pursuant to Chapter 97, part 2 (Underground Utility Districts) of the Municipal Code.

Pursuant to Chapter 97 of the City’s Municipal Code all new utilities to the subject property shall be undergrounded. This requirement is also addressed as part of the overall Plan Check requirements and review of the final map.

8. Any and all other improvements found necessary by the City to provide all services to each lot proposed to be created.

The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the City’s codes and will receive adequate utility service when built as designed.

9. In addition to the improvements as required by the City’s Municipal Code and Departments, there are also design requirements for the proposed tentative parcel map that need to be met. Pursuant to Section 152.12 of the City’s Municipal Code, the design of the subdivision shall conform to the requirements of this Chapter 152, any and all design requirements set forth in the General Plan, the design and development standards established for the associated zoning district per the Zoning Code, the applicable design guidelines set forth in the Design Guidelines Manual, generally accepted engineering standards, and to such standards required by the City, including, but not limited to, plans for grading and erosion control.

The Planning Division has reviewed the proposed subdivision of the proposed lot and determined that it meets the minimum development standards contained within the Municipal (Zoning) Code, including, setbacks, density, and height.

Additionally, the tentative parcel map is consistent with Goal 2.0 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan which states “accommodate new development that is compatible with and compliments existing conforming land uses” as the proposed parcels meet the existing development standards contained in the Code.

FINDINGS—TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP

In accordance with State law, Government Code Sections 66474 and 66474.6, the following findings shall be made for the approval of a Tentative Parcel Map:

Page 8 ends

1. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

The project is also consistent with the City’s General Plan. The designated land use for the site is Mixed-Use and the proposed open space use of the site is allowed by- right for lots with this land use designation. Furthermore, the project is consistent the policies in the General Plan to create pedestrian spaces in the downtown that connect to the City Hall courtyard and have the potential to support businesses that support pedestrianism such as outdoor cafes and flower shops.

The design of the civic plaza is in accordance with the 2016 Specific Plan, which is the Specific Plan that was in place at the time of the project’s approval. The land use, circulation surrounding the site, improvements to the site are all in compliance w ith that plan. The proposed use is civic plaza, which is an open space use that was contemplated by the 2016 Specific Plan. The Specific Plan called for new open space areas within the downtown area to improve pedestrian activity and improve destination appeal. The proposed circulation is consistent with the 2016 Specific Plan. There will be an alley and site parking at the northern edge of the site to support vehicle access. Parking and traffic were analyzed in 2022 by a parking and traffic consultant and the project was determined to have no adverse impacts on traffic and parking (Exhibit E).

The improvement of the proposed subdivision is also in compliance with the 2022 Downtown Specific Plan. The improvements consist of a civic plaza with accessory retail food businesses and these improvements are permitted land uses within the Downtown Core area of the specific plan. Furthermore, the improvements are consistent with the Plan’s policies to expand pedestrian-oriented parks and gathering spaces in the downtown area. Specifically, the subdivision is consistent with the Specific Plan’s Policy 1.1 to “ Expand and maintain an enhanced, interconnected system of public parks, trails and open space in Downtown area”, Policy 1.6 to “Expand the inventory of publicly accessible community gathering spaces so that businesses and residents are within a short walking distance of a park or recreational area”, Policy 2.13 to “Expand places and spaces where community events and festivals can occur”, and Policy 3.8 to “Create well-designed spaces for a high-quality user experience for all modes”.

2. The site is physically suitable for the type of development.

The site has a flat topography that lends itself to development in general and could support a civic plaza use. Also, it is not located in a flood hazard or high fire zone. Lastly, there is ample access to the site given that it is accessible from Pacific Avenue to the east, Sterling Way to the west, and Maine Avenue to the south.

3. The design of the proposed subdivision or the proposed improvements are unlikely to cause substantial damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife of their habitat.

The site is a fully urbanized area that is almost entirely paved. It is not a location that provides habitat for fish or wildlife and therefore development of the site for a civic plaza could not harm fish or wildlife habitat.

4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are unlikely to cause serious public health problems.

Page 9 ends

The site is currently developed with parking lots and street right of way, both of which facilitate automotive vehicle traffic. The subdivision supports the development of the site as a civic plaza, which facilitates public gathering for pedestrians. The proposed use is aligned with the 2016 Specific Plan and General Plan goals of providing more opportunities within the City for residents for exercise and recreation. Therefore, the proposed use is more likely to promote public health and is not likely to cause public health problems.

5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

In this connection, the governing body may approve a map if it finds that alternate easements, for access or for use, will be provided, and that these will be substantially equivalent to the ones previously acquired by the public.

This subsection shall only apply to easements of record or to easements established by judgement of a court of competent jurisdiction and no authority is hereby granted to a legislative body to determine that the public at large has acquired easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

There are no existing easements in the project area that were acquired by the public at large that would be adversely affected by this project. A portion of City right-of-way will be closed for the creation of the plaza, but vehicular access between Sterling Way and Pacific Avenue will continue via the alley connection at the northern edge of the project site. Furthermore, the traffic study undertaken in 2022 (Exhibit E) determined that the closure of the right-of-way necessary for the development of the si te for a civic plaza would not have an adverse effect on traffic and circulation for the area. It should also be mentioned that there are no existing private lots adjacent to the Project that will lose access to the street as result of this subdivision.

6. Discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system would result in a violation of existing requirements prescribed by a California regional water quality control board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code.

Sewer waste discharge from the project site will be in accordance with City, State, and Sanitation District regulations. The small commercial building will have indoor plumbing fixtures that contribute a minimal amount to the City’s overall sewage waste stream, but this contribution will not be in violation of existing requirements.

CEQA REVIEW
Once an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified for a project, the lead agency shall not require preparation of a subsequent of supplemental EIR unless one of three triggering conditions exists: (1) substantial changes are proposed in the project that will require major revisions of the EIR, (2) substantial changes occur in circumstances under which the project is being undertaken that will required major revisions in the EIR, or (3) new information of substantial importance to the project that was not known and could have been known when the EIR was certified as complete becomes available, and this condition (1,2, or 3) also would lead to new or more significant impacts (State CEQA Guidelines §151692, Public Resources Code §21166).

Staff recommends that no further environmental review be required because none of the conditions in Public Resources Code Section 21166 and/or State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 is triggered by the approval of the Tentative Parcel Map (“Project”). The act ion falls within the scope of the 2016 TOD Downtown Specific Plan EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2014121098), which was certified in October 2015, and the Addendum to the TOD Downtown Specific Plan EIR, which was adopted in February 2022 (Exhibit D), because the Zocalo Civic Plaza Park (also referred to as the Arts Park or Civic Park) was analyzed in both of these environmental documents.

Page 10 ends

(See, e.g., 2016 TOD Downtown Specific Plan Draft EIR, p. 2-11, 2-15; Addendum, p. 4.) Furthermore, the traffic study prepared for this project (Exhibit E) by a traffic engineering consultant confirms that the Project would have not new significant traffic and parking impacts outside the purview of the EIR and Addendum. Therefore, the Project would not:

1. Constitute a substantial change to the project that will require major revisions of the EIR or Addendum due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects;

2. Constitute a substantial change with respect to the circumstances under which the project is administered that will require major revisions of the EIR or Addendum to the involvement of new significant effects; and

3. Involve new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified that shows any of the following:
a) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the certified EIR or Addendum; b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe that shown in the EIR or Addendum; c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously not found to be feasible would in fac t be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation or alternative; or d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR and Addendum would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map will not result in new or more severe impacts requiring additional environmental review.

On February 2, 2024, a legal notice was published in the Baldwin Park Press. On February 1, 2024 legal notices were posted at City Hall and mailed to property owners and occupants within a 300- foot radius of the subject property. On February 14, 2024 at the regular Planning Commission meeting this agenda item was continued to the March 27 meeting where the Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the project. This project was appealed to the City Council on April 4, 2024 and the notice was published in the Baldwin Park Express, posted at City Hall, and mailed to property owners and occupants within a 300-foot radius of the subject property on May 2, 2024.

LEGAL REVIEW
This report has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and content.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Exhibit A, Planning Commission Resolution PC 23-26
Exhibit B, Tentative Parcel Map 84199
Exhibit C, 2016 TOD Downtown Specific Plan EIR
(https://www.baldwinpark.com/DocumentCenter/View/1948/Downtown-TOD-Specific-Plan-FinalEIR- PDF)
Exhibit D, Addendum to the 2016 TOD Downtown Specific Plan EIR dated February 2022 (https://www.baldwinpark.com/DocumentCenter/View/673/BP-Downtown-SP-EIR-Addendum-PDF) Exhibit E, Transportation Assessment
Exhibit F, City Council Minutes – Feb. 16, 2022 Meeting

Page 11 ends

Exhibit G, 2016 Downtown TOD Specific Plan
(https://www.baldwinpark.com/DocumentCenter/View/1947/BP-DowntownTODSpecificPlan- Final2016-PDF)
Exhibit H, Site and Vicinity Photos
Exhibit I, Letter of Opposition dated June 27, 2023
Exhibit J, Letter of Opposition dated February 14, 2024 Exhibit K, Review of Prior Public Comments Before Planning Commission Exhibit L, Review of Appellant’s Arguments

Exhibit M, City Council Resolution CC 24-13

Attachment #1
Exhibit A, Resolution PC 23-26
RESOLUTION PC 23-26

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF

THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK APPROVING A
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO CONSOLIDATE FIVE (5)

LOTS, VACATED STREET RIGHT -OF-WAY, AND A CITY
PARKING LOT INTO ONE (1) 92,680 SQUARE FOOT LOT

FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ZOCALO CIVIC

PLAZA PROJECT LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST

INTERSECTION OF MAINE AVENUE AND PACIFIC
AVENUE AND EXTENDS SOUTH OF MAINE STREET;
(APPLICANT: CITY OF BALDWIN PARK; CASE NUMBER
TPM 84199)

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby find, determine, and declare as follows:

(a) On February 16, 2022, City Staff received direction from the City Council to proceed with the development of a public plaza (Project) located at the northwest intersection of Maine Avenue and Pacific Avenue and extends south of Maine Street; and

(b) The City, acting as the applicant, prepared a T entative Parcel Map to consolidate five (5) lots, vacated street right -of-way, and a City parking lot into one (1) 92,680 square foot lot for the development of the Zocalo Civic Plaza; and

(c) That a duly noticed public hearing was held on February 14, 2024 on said Project by the Planning Commission, and the project was continued to a date certain on March 27, 2024; and

(d) That a duly noticed public hearing was held on March 27 , 2024 on said Project by the Planning Commission, and based upon evidence presented including applicable staff report and each member of the Commission being familiar with the property, it was determined that the facts as required by the Baldwin Park Municipal Code for the granting of the Project is present and the Project should be approved; and

(e) The proposed Project was analyzed by the 2016 TOD
Downtown Specific Plan EIR and Addendum as well as the traffic analysis prepared for this project and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 151692 and Public Resources Code Section Resolution PC 23-26
March 27, 2024

Page 2 ends

21166, no further environmental review is necessary since none of the conditions that would trigger further environmental review are present; and

(f) Each fact set forth in the staff report dated March 27, 2024, from Nick Baldwin, City Planner to the Chair and Planning Commissioners (“Staff Report”) is true and correct.

SECTION 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby adopt the following requirements and findings applicable to the approval of the T entative Parcel Map.

a) Adequate systems designed and constructed to provide all necessary utilities to each lot proposed to be created, including, but not limited to, facilities for water, natural gas, electricity, cable television and telecommunications telephone services.

b) An adequate domestic water distribution system designed and constructed to service each lot proposed to be created.

Valley County Water District is the purveyor in the area and water would be provided to the subject property by Valley County Water District.

c) An adequate sewage system designed and constructed to serve each lot proposed to be created.

The proposed project shall comply with any conditions of approval as imposed by the Sanitation District of Los Angeles County prior to approval of the final map by the City of Baldwin Park.

d) An adequate storm water drainage system designed and constructed to serve each lot proposed to be created.

The Public Works Department have designed the site to include the construction of storm drains to address stormwater in the area.

e) An adequate public and/or private street and/or alley system designed and constructed to serve each lot proposed to be created.

The site will be served by Sterling Way and Maine Avenue to the west and Pacific Avenue to the east. A drive aisle with parking will be created on the north Resolution PC 23-26
March 27, 2024

Page 3 ends

side of the parking area between Sterling Way and Pacific Avenue to allow for one-way vehicular access from the west.

A traffic study was prepared on August 18, 2022 date by the City to examine the potential impact to vehicular traffic associated with the closing of the segment on Maine Avenue between Sterling Way and Pacific Avenue (see Exhibit E ). The report concluded that no significant impacts to the surrounding areas would occur with the closing of this segment of road.

f) An adequate traffic regulatory system, including necessary traffic signals, signs, and pavement markings and striping.

The Project scope entails the closure of a portion of Maine Avenue and minor adjustments to the roads connecting to the Project site will be necessary to create a seamless transition. A new one- way alley will be created along the northern edge of the Project and this alley will be complete with new traffic signs, striping and pavement markings.

g) The undergrounding of utilities pursuant to Chapter 97, part 2 (Underground Utility District) of the Municipal Code.

Pursuant to Chapter 97 of the City’s Municipal Code all new utilities to the subject property shall be undergrounded. This requirement is also addressed as part of the overall plan check requirements and review of the final map.

h) Any and all other improvements found necessary by the City to provide all services to each lot proposed to be created.

The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the City’s codes and will receive adequate utility service when built as designed.

i) In addition to the improvements as required by the City’s Municipal Code and Departments, there are also design requirements for the proposed tentative parcel map that need to be met. Pursuant to Section 152.12 of the City’s Municipal Code, the design of the subdivision shall conform to the requirements of this Chapter 152, any and all design requirements set forth in the General Plan, the design and development standards established for the associated zoning district per the Zoning Code, the applicable design guidelines set forth in the Design Guidelines Manual, generally accepted engineering standards, and to such standards required by the City, including, but not limited to, plans for grading and erosion control.

The Planning Division has reviewed the proposed subdivision of the proposed lot meets the minimum development standards contained within Resolution PC 23-26
March 27, 2024

Page 4 ends

the Municipal (Zoning) Code, including, setbacks, density, and height.

Additionally the tentative parcel map is consistent with Goal 2.0 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan which states “accommodate new development that is compatible with and compliments existing conforming land uses” as the proposed parcels meet the existing development standards contained in the Code.

j) The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

The project is also consistent with the City’s General Plan. The designated land use for the site is Mixed- Use and the proposed open space use of the site is allowed by -right for lots with this land use designation. Furthermore, the project is consistent the policies in the General Plan to create pedestrian spaces in the downtown that connect to the City Hall courtyard and have the potential to support businesses that support pedestrianism such as outdoor cafes and flower shops.

The design of the civic plaza is in accordance with the 2016 Specific Plan, which is the Specific Plan that was in place at the time of the project’s approval. The land use, circulation surrounding the site, improvements to the site are all in compliance with that plan. The proposed use is civic plaza, which is an open space use that was contemplated by the 2016 Specific Plan. The Specific Plan called for new open space areas within the downtown area to improve pedestrian activity and improve destination appeal. The proposed circulation is consistent with the 2016 Specific Plan. There will be an alley and site parking at the northern edge of the site to support vehicle access. Parking and traffic were analyzed in 2022 by a parking and traffic consultant and the project was determined to have no adverse impacts on traffic and parking (Exhibit E).

Furthermore, the improvements are consistent with the Plan’s policies to expand pedestrian-oriented parks and gathering spaces in the downtown area. Specifically, the subdivision is consistent with the Specific Plan’s Policy 1.1 to “ Expand and maintain an enhanced, interconnected system of public parks, trails and open space in Downtown area”, Policy 1.6 to “Expand the inventory of publicly accessible community gathering spaces so that businesses and residents are within a short walking distance of a park or recreational area”, Policy 2.13 to “Expand places and spaces where community events and festivals can occur”, and Policy 3.8 to “Create well -designed spaces for a high- quality user experience for all modes”.

Resolution PC 23-26
March 27, 2024

Page 5 ends

k) The site is physically suitable for the type of development.

l) The design of the proposed subdivision or the proposed improvements are unlikely to cause substantial damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife of their habitat.

m) The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are unlikely to cause serious public health problems.

Therefore, the proposed use is more likely to promote public health and is not likely to cause public health problems.

n) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the governing body may approve a map if it finds that alternate easements, for access or for use, will be provided, and that these will be substantially equivalent to the ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall only apply to easements of record or to easements established by judgement of a court of competent jurisdiction and no authority is hereby granted to a legislative body to determine that the public at large has acquired easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

Page 6 ends

in 2022 (Exhibit E) determined that the closure of the right-of-way necessary for the development of the site for a civic plaza would not have an adverse effect on traffic and circulation for the area. It should also be mentioned that there are no existing private lots adjacent to the Project that will lose access to the street as result of this subdivision.

o) Discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system would result in a violation of existing requirements prescribed by a California regional water quality control board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code.

Sewer waste discharge from the project site will be in accordance with City, State, and Sanitation District regulations. The small commercial building will have indoor plumbing fixtures that will contribute a minimal amount to the City’s overall sewage waste stream, but this contribution will not be in violation of the existing requirements.

SECTION 3. The Application, as herein above described below, and the same is hereby approved subject to the following conditions:

(a) That the property shall be developed and maintained in substantial accordance with Exhibit “A” to the staff report for TPM 84199, dated March 27, 2024; and

(b) If within two (2 ) year s after the date of approval of TPM 84199, all conditions of approval have not been satisfied, then TPM 84199 shall become null and void; and

(c) Recordation of Final Parcel Map with the Los Angeles County Reorder shall be required prior to issuance of building permits.

(d) The Final Map shall be submitted to Los Angeles County Fire Department for review and approval prior to recordation.

SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the City Clerk and the Applicant.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 27
th day of March, 2024.

_____________________________________
CHAIR,

BALDWIN PARK PLANNING COMMISSION
Resolution PC 23-26
March 27, 2024

Page 7 ends

ATTEST:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss.

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK

I, NICK BALDWIN, Secretary of the Baldwin Park Planning Commission, do hereby certify that t he foregoing Resoluti on No. PC 23-26 was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 27
th day of March 2024 by the following vote:

AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ______________________________________ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ______________________________________ ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ______________________________________ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ______________________________________

________________________________________
Nick Baldwin

BALDWIN PARK PLANNING COMMISSION

Attachment #2
Exhibit B, Tentative Parcel Map 84199

Exhibit C, 2016 TOD Downtown Specific Plan EIR
(https://www.baldwinpark.com/DocumentCenter/
View/1948/Downtown-TOD-Specific-Plan-FinalEIR-PDF)
Attachment 4
Exhibit D, Addendum to the 2016 TOD Downtown Specific
Plan EIR dated February 2022
(https://www.baldwinpark.com/DocumentCenter/
View/673/BP-Downtown-SP-EIR-Addendum-PDF)

Attachment #5
Exhibit E, Transportation Assessment

O:\JOB_FILE\4468\Report\4468-M2-Zocalo Civic Plaza.doc
To: Kevin O’Brien, AIA LEED AP
Pouya Goshayeshi, AIA
La Canada Design Group
Date: August 18, 2022
From: Alfred C. Ying, P.E., PTP
David A. Roseman, P.E.

LLG, Engineers
LLG Ref: 1-21-4468-1
Subject:

Zocalo Park Project Transportation Assessment
City of Baldwin Park, California

Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) has prepared this memorandum to summarize the findings of the tra nsportation assessment for the Zocalo Park project (“project” herein). The project site is located at 14349 Pacific Avenue in the City of Baldwin Park, Californi a. The project involves the vacation of a portion of Maine Avenue, between Sterling Way to the west and Pacific Avenue/Maine Avenue (East) to the east, directly w est of the City Ha ll/Civic Center area. In addition, the roadway segment of Maine Avenue -Pacific Aven ue south of Ramona Boulevard will be narrowed. This assessment includes a summary of the existing conditions, project description, project site access and circulat ion scheme, a project tri p generation forecast, an assessment of the potential traffic effects associated with the pr oject, a traffic control warrant assessment , as well as a parking a ssessment. Briefly, it is concluded that no significant transportation impacts are expected with the project.

Existing Conditions

The project site is located at 14349 Pacific A venue in the City of Baldwin Park, California. Th e existing site is situated on the nort h side of Maine Avenue between Sterling Way and M aine Avenue (East). Existing vehicular access i s provided via driveways on Sterling Way, Maine Avenue, and Maine Avenue (East). The project site and general vicinity is illu strated in Figure 1. An aerial photograph of the existing project site is presented in Figure 2.

Project Description

The Zocalo Civic Plaza project involves the vacation of Maine Avenue, between Sterling Way to the west and Pacific Avenue/Maine Avenue (East) to the east, directly west of the City Hall/Civic Center area. A small retail building totaling approximately 3,250 square feet of floor area will be constructed as part of the project. A total of 27 parking spaces is planned to be provided. In addition, the roadway segment of Maine Avenue-Pacific Avenue, south of Ramona Boulevard, will also be narrowed to provide one vehicular travel lane and one bicycle lane in each direction. The conceptual project site plan is shown i n Figure 3. Completion and full occupancy of the project is expected to occur by the year 2023.

600 S. Lake Avenue
Suite 500
Pasadena, CA 91106
Pasadena
Irvine
San Diego
Woodland Hills

Kevin O’Brien, AIA LEED AP
Pouya Goshayeshi, AIA
August 18, 2022

Page 2 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4468\Report\4468-M2-Zocalo Civic Plaza.doc
Site Access and Circulation

Vehicular access to the project will be provided via Sterling Way and Maine Avenue (East). The exist ing dri veway on the east -west portion of Main e Avenue will be eliminated as part of the street vacation project.

Intersection Level of Service Analysis
Traffic Counts
The following ten (10) key study intersections have been identified for evaluation in coordination with the City (refer to Figure 1).

1. Baldwin Park Boulevard & Sterling Way (signalized)

2. Connector Road to Sterling Way & Ramona Boulevard (unsignalized)

3. Connector Road to Sterling Way/Sterling Way (unsignalized)

4. Sterling Way/Maine Avenue (unsignalized)

5. Cesar Chavez Drive & Ramona Boulevard (signalized)

6. Maine Avenue & Ramona Boulevard (signalized)

7. Maine Avenue/Westbound Only Alleyway (unsignalized)

8. Pacific Avenue/Maine Avenue (unsignalized)

9. Pacific Avenue/Bogart Avenue (unsignalized)

10. Pacific Avenue/Downing Avenue (signalized)
Manual counts of vehicular turning movements were conducted at the t en study intersections during the wee kday mor ning (AM) and a fternoon (PM) commute periods to determine the peak hour traffic volumes. The counts were conducted by an independent traffic count subconsultant (City Traffic Counters) at all ten intersections in March 2022 from 7:00 to 9:00 AM t o determine the AM peak commute hour, and from 4:00 to 6:00 PM to deter mine the PM peak commute hour. In conjunction with the turning movement vehicle counts, counts of bicycle and pedestrian volumes also were collected during the peak periods for informational purposes.

Traffic volumes at the study intersections show the typical peak periods bet ween 7:00 and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 and 6:00 PM generally associated with peak commute hours. The existing traffic volumes at the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours are shown in Fi gures 4 and 5, respectively .

Summary data worksheets of the manual traffic c ounts at the study intersections are contained in Appendix A.

Kevin O’Brien, AIA LEED AP
Pouya Goshayeshi, AIA
August 18, 2022

Page 3 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4468\Report\4468-M2-Zocalo Civic Plaza.doc
Existing Traffic Volume Shifts
As part of the vacation of Maine Avenue between Sterling Way to the west and Pacific Avenue/Maine Avenue (East) to the east , the east leg of the Sterling Way/Maine Avenue intersection and the wes t leg of the Pacific Avenue/Maine Avenue intersection will be vacated/eliminated. As a result, the existing southbound left-turn, eastbound through, westbound through, and westbound right -turn movements at the Sterling Way/Ma ine Avenue intersection as well as the northbound left -turn, southbound right-turn, eastbound left-turn, and eastbound right -tun movements at the Pacific Avenue/Maine Avenue intersection will be prohibited in the future after the project is completed.

It is expected that some localized shift s in traffic volumes would occur as part of the project. For example, the existing Maine A venue east-west traffic and the southbound left-turn movement at the Sterling Way intersectio n will be redistributed to other parallel ea st-west corridors such as Ramona Boulevard to th e north or Vineland Avenue to the south to bypass t he immediate project vicinity. Also, some of the northbound, southbound and eastbound turning m ovements at the Pacific Avenue/Maine Avenue intersection will be redistributed to other parallel north-south corridors such as Puente Avenue to the east or Merced Avenue to the west.

Retail Building Trip Generation
Traffic generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one -way vehicu lar movements, either entering or exiting the generating land use. Tr affic volumes expected to be generated by the pro ject retail building during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, as well as on a weekday daily basis, were e stimated using rates published in the 11th Edition of the Trip Generation Manual, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), [Washington, D.C., 2021]. Traffic volumes expected to be generated by the retail building were based upon rates per 1,000 gross square feet of leasable area. ITE Land Use Codes 822 (Strip Retail Plaza < 40k) trip generation average rates were used to forecast t he traffic vo lumes expected to be generated by the project retail building.

The trip generation rates and forecast of the vehicular trips anticipated to be generated by the project retail building are presented in Table 1. As summarized in Table 1, the retail building is forecast to generate eight vehicle trips (five inbound trips and three outbound trips) during the weekday AM peak hour. During the weekday PM peak hour, the retail building is forecast to generate 21 vehicle trips (11 inbound trips and 10 outbound trips). Ove r a 24-hour period, the retail building is forecast to generate 177 daily trip ends (approximately 89 inbound trips and 89 outbound trips) during a typical weekday.

Kevin O’Brien, AIA LEED AP
Pouya Goshayeshi, AIA
August 18, 2022

Page 4 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4468\Report\4468-M2-Zocalo Civic Plaza.doc
Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
Project-generated traffic was assigned to the adjacent roadway system based on a traffic distribution pattern which acc ounted for the project land use , the site ’s proximity to major traffic corridors (i.e., Maine Avenue , Pacific Avenue, Sterling Way, Ramona Boulevard, etc.), existing intersection traffic volumes, existing and future site access ingress/egress schemes, and nearby population a nd em ployment centers. In addition, the shift in existing traffic due to th e vacation of Maine Avenue between Sterling Way to the west and Pacific Avenue/Maine Avenue (East) to the east was also c arefully considered. T he forecast project traffi c volumes at the study intersections for the wee kday AM and PM peak hours are displayed in Figure 6 and Figure 7, respectively. The traffic volume assignmen ts presented in Figure 6 and Figure 7 reflect both the redistribution of traffic due to the street vacation as well as traffic associated with the project retail building.

Other Improvements/Recommendations
The following i mprovements/recommendations ar e also incorpor ated in this transportation assessment:

Int. No. 6: Maine Avenue & Ramona Boulevard
Based on existing peak hour intersection operations as well as the redistribution of traffic due to the street vacation, roadway narrowing, and traffic associated with the project retail building, it is recommended that the length of the northbound left-turn lane be extended to 130 feet. Immediately south of the northbound left-turn lane, a two-way-left-turn area/lane is also recommended. The recommended extension of the northbound left-turn lane and provision of the two-way-left-turn area/lane is anticipated to facilitate both traffic turning left onto Ramona Boulevard as well as traffic turning left onto the westbound only Alleyway (located immediately south of this intersection). In addition, it is recommended that minor adjustments to signal timing be implemented at this signalized intersection. During the weekday AM and PM peak hours, it is recommended that up to four seconds of additional green time be allocated to facilitate the left-turn volumes at all four intersection approaches (and on a corresponding basis that up to four seconds of green time be reduced for the subject through movements). These recommendations are anticipated to reduce vehicle queuing and improve the overall intersection operations at this location.

It is also recommended for City consideration that Maine Avenue south of Ramona Boulevard be renamed as Pacific Avenue to reduce any potential motorist confusion.

Int. No. 8: Pacific Avenue & Maine Avenue
As a result of the vacation of Maine Avenue and the roadway narrowing of Maine Avenue-Pacific Avenue, only northbound Pacific Avenue and southbound Maine Kevin O’Brien, AIA LEED AP
Pouya Goshayeshi, AIA
August 18, 2022

Page 5 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4468\Report\4468-M2-Zocalo Civic Plaza.doc
Avenue through movements will be permitted at this location. It is recommended that a future mid-block cr osswalk be installed on Maine Avenue/ Pacific Avenue.

Furthermore, it is recommended that this crosswalk (i.e., connecting the City Hall to the Zocalo Park project) be signalized through the installation of a pedestrian hybrid beacon, which should be programmed to delay the onset of fl ashing yellow sequence during peak traffic flows to minimize potential disruption on Maine Avenue /Pacific Avenue.

Int. No. 9: Pacific Avenue/Bogart Avenue
It is LLG ’s understanding that a traffic signal ins tallation has been approved for this intersection. As such, thi s tran sportation assessment appropriately ass umes signalized operations at this location under the existing with project analysis condition.

Level of Service (LOS) Analyses
The intersection LO S analyses were prepar ed utilizing the Synchro 11 software package wh ich implements the Highway Capacity Man ual (HCM) operational methods. Synchro is a sophisticated model which allows engineers to access and optimize traffic signal and corridor operations. A Synchro network was created based on current traffic signal timing charts and field review of existing conditions at the study intersect ions. In addition, specifics such as lane conf igurations, l ane widths, storage lengths, crosswalk locations, posted speed l imits, traffic signal phasing a nd cycle lengths for t he signalized intersections , traffic volumes, etc., were coded to complete the existing network.

The HCM method determines th e average con trol de lay ex perienced at th e intersections. This methodology estimates the average control delay for each of the subject movem ents and de termines the LOS for each constrained movement.

Average control delay for any particular movement is a function of the capacity of the approach and the degree of saturation. The overall average control delay is measured in seconds per vehicle, and the LO S is then calculated for the intersections as a whole. The T wo-Way Stop Control (T WSC) methodology esti mates the average control delay for each minor-street movement (or shared movement) as well as major- street left -turns and determines the LOS for each constrained movement. The average control delay is measured in secon ds per vehi cle, and in cludes delay d ue to deceleration to a st op at the back of the queue from free -flow speed, move-up time within the queue, stopped delay at the front of the queue, and delay due to acceleration back to free- flow speed. A description of the HCM me thod and corresponding LOS is provided in Appendix B.

The resulting existing with project (i.e., including street vacation, roadway narrowing, and retail building) traffic volumes at the study locations during the weekday AM and PM peak hours are shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively.

Kevin O’Brien, AIA LEED AP
Pouya Goshayeshi, AIA
August 18, 2022

Page 6 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4468\Report\4468-M2-Zocalo Civic Plaza.doc
The transportation asse ssment pre pared for the stu dy locations using the H CM methodology is summarized in Tabl e 2. As shown in column [1] of Table 2, all ten study intersections are presen tly operating at LOS D or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours under existing conditions. With the redistribution of existing traffic due to the street vacation , roadway narrowing, and new traffic associated with the retail buildin g, plus the other impro vements and recommendations described above, all ten study in tersections are expe cted to co ntinue to operat e at LOS D or better during the weekd ay AM and PM peak hours, as indicated in column [ 2] of Table 2. Four of the study intersections are anticip ated to result in slight increase s in delays while the remaining six study intersecti ons are anticipated to res ult in slight decreases in delays. N one of the study intersections is expected to degrade to LOS E or LOS F operat ions during the anal ysis peak hours. The HCM data worksheets for the study intersections are contained in Appendix B.

Traffic Control Warrant Assessment

A traffic control warrant assessment has been pre pared to determine what type of traffic control is appropriate at Pacific Avenue/Maine Avenue following the vacation of Maine Avenue, between Sterling Way to the west and Pacific Avenue/Maine Avenue (East) to the east, and the roadway narrowing of Maine Avenue-Pacific Avenue south of Ramona Boulevard. Warrant No. 1 (Eight H our Vehicular Volume), Warra nt No. 2 (Four Hour Vehicular Volume), and Warrant No. 3 (Peak Hour Volume) outlined in Chapter 4C of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices1 (MUTCD) were initially reviewed. However, s ince there will no longer be a minor street at Pacific Avenue/Maine Avenue following the vacation of Maine Avenue , none of the vehicular volume warrants is expected to be satisfied. Thus, a standard traffic signal control is not determined to be warranted.

Guidelines outlined in Chapter 4F of the MUTCD were also reviewed for potential pedestrian hybrid beacon installation at the sub ject location. A pedestrian hybri d beacon, also known as a H AWK (High-Intensity Activated CrossWalK) beacon, is used to warn and control traffic at an unsignalized location to assist pedestrians in crossing a roadway at a marked crosswalk. As part of the Zocalo Park project, the roadway segment of Maine Avenue -Pacific Avenue will be narrowed and t he crosswalk length at the subject location will be reduced to approximately 44 feet.

For a major street where the posted speed limit exceeds 35 miles per hour ( mph), a HAWK beacon should be considered when the plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the ma jor street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding total of all pedestrians crossing the major street for one hour of an average day falls above the applicable curve in Figur e 4F-2 for the length of the crosswalk. The lower thre shold

1 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), State of California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency, Department of Transportation, 2014 Edition, Revision 6, March 30, 2021.

Kevin O’Brien, AIA LEED AP
Pouya Goshayeshi, AIA
August 18, 2022

Page 7 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4468\Report\4468-M2-Zocalo Civic Plaza.doc
volume is 20 pedestrians per hour. A review of the existing count data contained in Appendix A shows nine pe destrians crossing at the subject location during the weekday PM peak hour. However, with the Zocalo Park project amenities and other entertainment activities, the lower pedestrian threshold volume will most certainly be met.

For crosswalks that have l engths other than the four that are specific ally shown in Figure 4F-2, the values shoul d be interpol ated between the curves. As shown in the worksheet contained in Appendix C, the guidance is met when the plotted point falls above the appropriate curve.

The number of pedestrian crossings at Maine Avenue/ Pacific Avenue is expected to increase after the completion of the Zocalo Park project. Furthermore, based on the posted speed limit of 4 0 mph on Paci fic Avenue and t he vehicular traffic volumes shown in Appendix C (i.e., approximately 1,300 vehicles during the weekday PM peak hour under the existing with project condition), installation of a HAWK beacon at the subject Maine Avenue/ Pacific Avenue location is justified and therefore recommended.

Project Parking

The City of Baldwin Park Code of Ordinanc es off-street p arking and loading requirements for re sidential and non- residential land uses are set forth in Section 153.150. In accordanc e with the Code of Ordinances parking regulat ions, t he applicable parking requirement for the project is as follows:
• Retail sales - general 1.0 space/250square feet of building area Through strict ap plication of the Code of Ordinances parking regulations, the following parking requirement is calculated for the project retail building:
• Retail Building: 3,250 SF x 1.0 space/250 SF = 13 spaces Based on the above calculation, the City Code parking r equirement for the p roject retail building totals 13 spaces. Thus, the project parking supply of 27 spaces would satisfy the Code parking requirement.

Summary and Conclusions
• Project Descriptio n – This t ransportation assessment has be en conducted to identify and evaluate the potential impacts of traff ic generated by the Zocalo Park project. The project site is located at 14349 Pacific Avenue in the City of Baldwin Park. The Zocalo Park project involves the vacation of Maine Avenue, between Sterling Way to the west and Pacific Avenue/Maine Avenue (East) to the east, directly west of the City Hall/Civic Center area. A small retail building totaling approximately 3,250 square feet of floor ar ea will be constructed as part of the Kevin O’Brien, AIA LEED AP
Pouya Goshayeshi, AIA
August 18, 2022

Page 8 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4468\Report\4468-M2-Zocalo Civic Plaza.doc
project. A total of 27 parking spaces is planned to be provided. In addition, the roadway segment of Maine Avenue -Pacific Avenue, south of Ramona Boule vard, will also be narrowed to provide one vehicular travel lane and one bicycle lane in each direction. Completion and full occupancy of the proposed project is expected to occur by the year 2023.
• Project Retail Building Trip Generation Forecast – The project retail building is forecast to generate eight vehicle trips ( five inbound trips and three outbound trips) during the weekday AM peak hour. During the weekday PM peak h our, the project retail building is forecast to generate 21 vehicle trips (11 inbound trips and 10 outbound trips). Over a 24-hour period, the project retail building is forecast to generate 177 daily trip ends (approxi mately 89 inbound trips and 89 outbound trips) during a typical weekday.
• Level of Service Analysis – All ten study intersections are presently operating at LOS D or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours unde r exis ting conditions. With the redi stribution of existing traffic due to th e street vacation , roadway narrowing, new traffic associated with the retail buildin g, plus the other improvements and recommendations , all ten study in tersections are expected to continue to operate at LOS D or better during t he weekday AM and PM peak hours. None of the study intersections is expected to degrade to LOS E or LOS F operations during the anal ysis peak hours . No significant transportation impacts are expected with the project.
• Traffic Control Warrant A ssessment - Guidelines outlined in the MUTCD were reviewed for potential HAWK beacon insta llation at Maine Avenue -Pacific Avenue. The number of pedestrian crossings is expected to increase after the completion of the Zocalo Park project. In additi on, based on the posted speed limit of 40 mph on P acific Avenue and the peak hour vehicular traffic volumes under the with project condition, installation of a HAWK beacon at the subject location is justified and therefore recommended.
• Project Parking – The City Code parking r equirement for the pro ject retail building totals 13 spaces. Th us, the project p arking supply of 27 spaces would satisfy the Code parking requirement.

In modeling traffic signal opera tions using the Synchro software, LLG is confident that the overall traffic operations will work well during the AM and P M peak hour analysis time periods. Nonetheless, it is suggested that large scale activities/events in Kevin O’Brien, AIA LEED AP
Pouya Goshayeshi, AIA
August 18, 2022

Page 9 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4468\Report\4468-M2-Zocalo Civic Plaza.doc
the plaza be scheduled outside of the weekday AM a nd PM peak periods, to the extent feasible.

Attachments
Tables
1 Project Trip Generation
2 Summary of Intersection Delays and Levels of Service

Figures
1 Vicinity Map
2 Aerial Photograph of Existing Project Site
3 Overall Site Plan
4 Existing Traffic Volumes – Weekday AM Peak Hour
5 Existing Traffic Volumes – Weekday PM Peak Hour
6 Project Traffic Volumes – Weekday AM Peak Hour
7 Project Traffic Volumes – Weekday PM Peak Hour
8 Existing With Project Traffic Volumes – Weekday AM Peak Hour 9 Existing With Project Traffic Volumes – Weekday PM Peak Hour

Appendices
A Traffic, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Count Data
B Intersection Operational Analysis – HCM Data Worksheets C Traffic Control Warrant Analysis

Table 1
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION [1]

DAILY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
TRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES [2] VOLUMES [2]

LAND USE SIZE VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL
Proposed Project
Retail Building [3] 3,250 GLSF 177 5 3 8 11 10 21
NET INCREASE 177 5 3 8 11 10 21
[1] Source: ITE "Trip Generation Manual", 11th Edition, 2021. [2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. [3] ITE Land Use Code 822 (Strip Retail Plaza <40k) trip generation average rates. - Daily Trip Rate: 54.45 trips/1,000 SF of floor area; 50% inbound/50% outbound - AM Peak Hour Trip Rate: 2.36 trips/1,000 SF of floor area; 60% inbound/40% outbound - PM Peak Hour Trip Rate: 6.59 trips/1,000 SF of floor area; 50% inbound/50% outbound LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
LLG Ref. 1-22-4468-1
Zocalo Civic Plaza Project
Table 2
SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION DELAYS AND LEVELS OF SERVICE [1]

WEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOURS
[a] [b]

EXISTING CHANGE

EXISTING WITH PROJECT IN

TRAFFIC PEAK DELAY LOS DELAY LOS DELAY
NO. INTERSECTION CONTROL HOUR [2] [3] [2] [3] ([b]-[a]) 1 Baldwin Park Boulevard/ Signalized AM 9.6 A 10.9 B 1.3 Sterling Way PM 7.5 A 8.8 A 1.3
2 Sterling Way (Connector Rd)/ Two-Way AM 16.7 C 25.1 D 8.4 Ramona Boulevard Stop PM 16.6 C 21.4 C 4.8
3 Connector Road/ Two-Way AM 10.7 B 9.3 A -1.4
Sterling Way Stop PM 10.8 B 9.4 A -1.4
4 Sterling Way / Two-Way Stop AM 18.8 C 7.5 A -11.3
Maine Avenue to PM 15.7 C 7.4 A -8.3
All-Way Stop
5 Cesar Chavez Drive/ Signalized AM 4.8 A 4.7 A -0.1
Ramona Boulevard PM 7.1 A 7.0 A -0.1
6 Maine Avenue/ Signalized AM 40.7 D 42.5 D 1.8
Ramona Boulevard PM 50.1 D 54.6 D 4.5
7 Maine Avenue/ Unsignalized AM 22.2 C 25.7 D 3.5
Alleyway (WB) PM 10.1 B 12.3 B 2.2
8 Pacific Avenue/ Two-Way Stop AM 20.6 C 0.8 A -19.8
Maine Avenue [4] to PM 23.1 C 0.9 A -22.2
Signalized
9 Pacific Avenue/ Two-Way Stop AM 19.8 B 3.2 A -16.6
Bogart Avenue to PM 20.4 C 4.7 A -15.7
Signalized
10 Pacific Avenue/ Signalized AM 7.3 A 7.0 A -0.3
Downing Avenue PM 6.3 A 6.1 A -0.2
[1]
[2] Reported control delay values in seconds per vehicle. [3] Intersection Levels of Service are based on the following criteria:

Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection
Control Delay (s/veh) Control Delay (s/veh) LOS
<= 10 <= 10 A
> 10-20 > 10-15 B
> 20-35 > 15-25 C
> 35-55 > 25-35 D
> 55-80 > 35-50 E
> 80 > 50 F
[4]
Intersection Level of Service analysis based on the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition operational analysis methodologies.

Intersection to be vacated under project conditions. A signalized mid-block crosswalk will be added.

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
LLG Ref. 1-22-4468-1
Zocalo Civic Plaza Project

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-22-4468-1 Zocalo Park Project

APPENDIX A

TRAFFIC, PEDESTRIAN, AND BICYCLE COUNT DATA
File Name : BaldwinParkBlvd_SterlingWay
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Vehicles
Baldwin Park Blvd
Southbound
Sterling Way
Westbound
Baldwin Park Blvd
Northbound Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 8 77 0 16 0 21 0 71 4 0 0 0 197
07:15 AM 8 86 0 27 0 27 0 87 10 0 0 0 245
07:30 AM 12 142 0 42 0 29 0 127 18 0 0 0 370
07:45 AM 27 122 0 51 0 34 0 152 32 0 0 0 418
Total 55 427 0 136 0 111 0 437 64 0 0 0 1230
08:00 AM 19 126 0 37 0 38 0 128 24 0 0 0 372
08:15 AM 9 106 0 26 0 36 0 119 11 0 0 0 307
08:30 AM 11 105 0 17 0 15 0 81 11 0 0 0 240
08:45 AM 8 96 0 17 0 15 0 84 15 0 0 0 235
Total 47 433 0 97 0 104 0 412 61 0 0 0 1154
09:00 AM 8 74 0 10 0 24 0 80 10 0 0 0 206
09:15 AM 5 67 0 18 0 19 0 74 10 0 0 0 193
09:30 AM 10 66 0 14 0 16 0 78 11 0 0 0 195
09:45 AM 13 51 0 19 0 21 0 77 9 0 0 0 190
Total 36 258 0 61 0 80 0 309 40 0 0 0 784
03:00 PM 28 115 0 16 0 23 0 134 20 0 0 0 336
03:15 PM 20 96 0 21 0 14 0 131 21 0 0 0 303
03:30 PM 23 106 0 36 0 29 0 126 21 0 0 0 341
03:45 PM 21 97 0 22 0 26 0 136 22 0 0 0 324
Total 92 414 0 95 0 92 0 527 84 0 0 0 1304
04:00 PM 27 103 0 22 0 29 0 126 12 0 0 0 319
04:15 PM 25 106 0 24 0 19 0 146 11 0 0 0 331
04:30 PM 15 100 0 19 0 14 0 127 22 0 0 0 297
04:45 PM 17 115 0 11 0 21 0 129 18 0 0 0 311
Total 84 424 0 76 0 83 0 528 63 0 0 0 1258
05:00 PM 23 118 0 17 0 26 0 123 18 0 0 0 325
05:15 PM 23 132 0 18 0 30 0 127 12 0 0 0 342
05:30 PM 14 108 0 21 0 23 0 148 11 0 0 0 325
05:45 PM 24 114 0 29 0 27 0 120 11 0 0 0 325
Total 84 472 0 85 0 106 0 518 52 0 0 0 1317
06:00 PM 13 97 0 27 0 20 0 127 14 0 0 0 298
06:15 PM 19 99 0 23 0 26 0 106 12 0 0 0 285
06:30 PM 24 81 0 17 0 21 0 123 11 0 0 0 277
06:45 PM 17 94 0 23 0 27 0 115 10 0 0 0 286
Total 73 371 0 90 0 94 0 471 47 0 0 0 1146
Grand Total 471 2799 0 640 0 670 0 3202 411 0 0 0 8193
Apprch % 14.4 85.6 0 48.9 0 51.1 0 88.6 11.4 0 0 0
Total % 5.7 34.2 0 7.8 0 8.2 0 39.1 5 0 0 0

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : BaldwinParkBlvd_SterlingWay
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Baldwin Park Blvd
Southbound
Sterling Way
Westbound
Baldwin Park Blvd
Northbound Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 12 142 0 154 42 0 29 71 0 127 18 145 0 0 0 0 370 07:45 AM 27 122 0 149 51 0 34 85 0 152 32 184 0 0 0 0 418 08:00 AM 19 126 0 145 37 0 38 75 0 128 24 152 0 0 0 0 372 08:15 AM 9 106 0 115 26 0 36 62 0 119 11 130 0 0 0 0 307 Total Volume 67 496 0 563 156 0 137 293 0 526 85 611 0 0 0 0 1467 % App. Total 11.9 88.1 0 53.2 0 46.8 0 86.1 13.9 0 0 0 PHF .620 .873 .000 .914 .765 .000 .901 .862 .000 .865 .664 .830 .000 .000 .000 .000 .877 Baldwin Park Blvd

Sterling Way
Baldwin Park Blvd
Right
0 Thru
496
Left
67 InOut Total
663 563 1226
Right
137
Thru
0 Left
156
OutTotal In
152 293 445
Left
0 Thru
526
Right
85 Out TotalIn
652 611 1263
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 TotalOut In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : BaldwinParkBlvd_SterlingWay
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Baldwin Park Blvd
Southbound
Sterling Way
Westbound
Baldwin Park Blvd
Northbound Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 23 118 0 141 17 0 26 43 0 123 18 141 0 0 0 0 325 05:15 PM 23 132 0 155 18 0 30 48 0 127 12 139 0 0 0 0 342 05:30 PM 14 108 0 122 21 0 23 44 0 148 11 159 0 0 0 0 325 05:45 PM 24 114 0 138 29 0 27 56 0 120 11 131 0 0 0 0 325 Total Volume 84 472 0 556 85 0 106 191 0 518 52 570 0 0 0 0 1317 % App. Total 15.1 84.9 0 44.5 0 55.5 0 90.9 9.1 0 0 0 PHF .875 .894 .000 .897 .733 .000 .883 .853 .000 .875 .722 .896 .000 .000 .000 .000 .963 Baldwin Park Blvd

Sterling Way
Baldwin Park Blvd
Right
0 Thru
472
Left
84 InOut Total
624 556 1180
Right
106
Thru
0 Left
85 OutTotal In
136 191 327
Left
0 Thru
518
Right
52 Out TotalIn
557 570 1127
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 TotalOut In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : BaldwinParkBlvd_SterlingWay_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Baldwin Park Blvd
Southbound
Sterling Way
Westbound
Baldwin Park Blvd
Northbound Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3
07:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4
Total 0 0 0 5 0 8 0 0 13
08:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 3
08:15 AM 0 0 1 3 0 2 0 0 6
08:30 AM 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 4
08:45 AM 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 5
Total 0 0 1 9 0 8 0 0 18
09:00 AM 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 5
09:15 AM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2
09:30 AM 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 3
09:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 4
Total 0 0 1 6 0 7 0 0 14
03:00 PM 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 8
03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
03:30 PM 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 4
03:45 PM 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 6
Total 0 0 1 9 0 10 0 0 20
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
04:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 3
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
04:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 4
Total 0 0 0 2 0 7 0 0 9
05:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2
05:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 4
05:30 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
05:45 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
Total 0 0 0 7 0 3 0 0 10
06:00 PM 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 5
06:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 3
06:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Total 0 0 0 6 0 3 0 0 9
Grand Total 0 0 3 44 0 46 0 0 93
Apprch % 0 0 6.4 93.6 0 100 0 0
Total % 0 0 3.2 47.3 0 49.5 0 0

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : BaldwinParkBlvd_SterlingWay_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Baldwin Park Blvd
Southbound
Sterling Way
Westbound
Baldwin Park Blvd
Northbound Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:15 AM
08:15 AM 0 0 0 1 3 4 0 2 2 0 0 0 6
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 4
08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 5
09:00 AM 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 5
Total Volume 0 0 0 2 10 12 0 8 8 0 0 0 20
% App. Total 0 0 16.7 83.3 0 100 0 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .500 .833 .750 .000 1.00 1.00 .000 .000 .000 .833 Baldwin Park Blvd

Sterling Way
Baldwin Park Blvd
Thru
0 Peds
0 InOut Total
0 0 0
Thru
2 Peds
10 OutTotal In
0 12 12
Thru
0 Peds
8 Out TotalIn
0 8 8
Thru
0 Peds
0 TotalOut In
2 0 2
Peak Hour Begins at 08:15 AM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : BaldwinParkBlvd_SterlingWay_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Baldwin Park Blvd
Southbound
Sterling Way
Westbound
Baldwin Park Blvd
Northbound Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.

Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:00 PM
03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 3 3 0 0 0 8
03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2
03:30 PM 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 4
03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 4 4 0 0 0 6
Total Volume 0 0 0 1 9 10 0 10 10 0 0 0 20
% App. Total 0 0 10 90 0 100 0 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .250 .450 .500 .000 .625 .625 .000 .000 .000 .625 Baldwin Park Blvd

Sterling Way
Baldwin Park Blvd
Thru
0 Peds
0 InOut Total
0 0 0
Thru
1 Peds
9 OutTotal In
0 10 10
Thru
0 Peds
10 Out TotalIn
0 10 10
Thru
0 Peds
0 TotalOut In
1 0 1
Peak Hour Begins at 03:00 PM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay(ConnectorRoad)_RamonaBlvd
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Vehicles
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound
Sterling Way (Connector
Road)
Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 11 183 0 4 0 2 0 86 0 286
07:15 AM 0 0 0 10 179 0 6 0 3 0 120 3 321
07:30 AM 0 0 0 16 247 0 7 0 5 0 152 10 437
07:45 AM 0 0 0 11 230 0 3 0 12 0 172 3 431
Total 0 0 0 48 839 0 20 0 22 0 530 16 1475
08:00 AM 0 0 0 7 209 0 1 0 11 0 178 5 411
08:15 AM 0 0 0 9 198 0 2 0 7 0 143 2 361
08:30 AM 0 0 0 5 171 0 6 0 3 0 126 8 319
08:45 AM 0 0 0 7 149 0 4 0 6 0 140 4 310
Total 0 0 0 28 727 0 13 0 27 0 587 19 1401
09:00 AM 0 0 0 2 118 0 5 0 6 0 137 2 270
09:15 AM 0 0 0 3 153 0 3 0 7 0 124 5 295
09:30 AM 0 0 0 8 125 0 5 0 6 0 132 2 278
09:45 AM 0 0 0 7 148 0 2 0 5 0 157 5 324
Total 0 0 0 20 544 0 15 0 24 0 550 14 1167
03:00 PM 0 0 0 6 175 0 3 0 12 0 271 4 471
03:15 PM 0 0 0 9 171 0 0 0 9 0 249 5 443
03:30 PM 0 0 0 14 161 0 2 0 7 0 233 9 426
03:45 PM 0 0 0 11 184 0 1 0 8 0 242 9 455
Total 0 0 0 40 691 0 6 0 36 0 995 27 1795
04:00 PM 0 0 0 9 155 0 1 0 3 0 219 5 392
04:15 PM 0 0 0 11 180 0 0 0 5 0 266 9 471
04:30 PM 0 0 0 5 154 0 7 0 8 0 235 11 420
04:45 PM 0 0 0 10 184 0 0 0 14 0 276 8 492
Total 0 0 0 35 673 0 8 0 30 0 996 33 1775
05:00 PM 0 0 0 11 155 0 0 0 12 0 259 3 440
05:15 PM 0 0 0 13 186 0 3 0 8 0 240 7 457
05:30 PM 0 0 0 11 184 0 1 0 6 0 245 8 455
05:45 PM 0 0 0 10 170 0 1 0 4 0 256 4 445
Total 0 0 0 45 695 0 5 0 30 0 1000 22 1797
06:00 PM 0 0 0 13 154 0 1 0 16 0 227 6 417
06:15 PM 0 0 0 9 161 0 4 0 4 0 222 3 403
06:30 PM 0 0 0 5 127 0 1 0 7 0 188 2 330
06:45 PM 0 0 0 3 128 0 1 0 8 0 222 5 367
Total 0 0 0 30 570 0 7 0 35 0 859 16 1517
Grand Total 0 0 0 246 4739 0 74 0 204 0 5517 147 10927
Apprch % 0 0 0 4.9 95.1 0 26.6 0 73.4 0 97.4 2.6
Total % 0 0 0 2.3 43.4 0 0.7 0 1.9 0 50.5 1.3

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay(ConnectorRoad)_RamonaBlvd
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound
Sterling Way (Connector
Road)
Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 16 247 0 263 7 0 5 12 0 152 10 162 437 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 11 230 0 241 3 0 12 15 0 172 3 175 431 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 7 209 0 216 1 0 11 12 0 178 5 183 411
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 9 198 0 207 2 0 7 9 0 143 2 145 361
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 43 884 0 927 13 0 35 48 0 645 20 665 1640 % App. Total 0 0 0 4.6 95.4 0 27.1 0 72.9 0 97 3
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .672 .895 .000 .881 .464 .000 .729 .800 .000 .906 .500 .908 .938

Ramona Blvd
Ramona Blvd
Sterling Way (Connector Road)
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 InOut Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
884
Left
43 OutTotal In
680 927 1607
Left
13 Thru
0 Right
35 Out TotalIn
63 48 111
Left
0 Thru
645
Right
20 TotalOut In
897 665 1562
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay(ConnectorRoad)_RamonaBlvd
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound
Sterling Way (Connector
Road)
Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 10 184 0 194 0 0 14 14 0 276 8 284 492 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 11 155 0 166 0 0 12 12 0 259 3 262 440 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 13 186 0 199 3 0 8 11 0 240 7 247 457
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 11 184 0 195 1 0 6 7 0 245 8 253 455
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 45 709 0 754 4 0 40 44 0 1020 26 1046 1844 % App. Total 0 0 0 6 94 0 9.1 0 90.9 0 97.5 2.5
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .865 .953 .000 .947 .333 .000 .714 .786 .000 .924 .813 .921 .937

Ramona Blvd
Ramona Blvd
Sterling Way (Connector Road)
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 InOut Total
0 0 0
Right
0 Thru
709
Left
45 OutTotal In
1060 754 1814
Left
4 Thru
0 Right
40 Out TotalIn
71 44 115
Left
0 Thru
1020
Right
26 TotalOut In
713 1046 1759
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay(ConnectorRoad)_RamonaBlvd_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound
Sterling Way
(Connector Road)
Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Total 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Total 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
Total 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 11
Apprch % 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 100
Total % 0 0 0 0 90.9 0 0 9.1

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay(ConnectorRoad)_RamonaBlvd_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound
Sterling Way (Connector
Road)
Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 1 4
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 100
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .375 .000 .375 .000 .250 .250 .500

Ramona Blvd
Ramona Blvd
Sterling Way (Connector Road)
Thru
0 Peds
0 InOut Total
3 0 3
Thru
0 Peds
0 OutTotal In
0 0 0
Thru
3 Peds
0 Out TotalIn
0 3 3
Thru
0 Peds
1 TotalOut In
0 1 1
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay(ConnectorRoad)_RamonaBlvd_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound
Sterling Way (Connector
Road)
Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.

Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:30 PM
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2
06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .500

Ramona Blvd
Ramona Blvd
Sterling Way (Connector Road)
Thru
0 Peds
0 InOut Total
4 0 4
Thru
0 Peds
0 OutTotal In
0 0 0
Thru
4 Peds
0 Out TotalIn
0 4 4
Thru
0 Peds
0 TotalOut In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 05:30 PM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay(ConnectorRoad)_SterlingWay
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Vehicles
Sterling Way (Connector
Road)
Southbound
Sterling Way
Westbound
Car Wash Driveway
Northbound
Sterling Way
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 3 0 8 1 18 6 0 0 0 1 9 0 46
07:15 AM 5 0 11 0 37 8 0 0 0 1 17 1 80
07:30 AM 11 0 15 0 49 12 0 0 0 4 24 0 115
07:45 AM 13 0 8 0 55 10 0 0 0 4 47 0 137
Total 32 0 42 1 159 36 0 0 0 10 97 1 378
08:00 AM 9 1 3 0 64 7 0 0 0 5 32 0 121
08:15 AM 9 0 6 1 34 11 0 0 0 1 16 0 78
08:30 AM 9 0 5 1 16 8 0 0 0 3 21 0 63
08:45 AM 4 1 5 0 24 10 0 0 0 5 14 0 63
Total 31 2 19 2 138 36 0 0 0 14 83 0 325
09:00 AM 2 0 3 0 20 9 0 0 0 5 13 0 52
09:15 AM 8 0 2 0 26 9 0 0 0 4 11 0 60
09:30 AM 9 0 1 0 21 9 0 0 0 3 17 1 61
09:45 AM 8 0 3 0 13 9 0 0 0 3 12 1 49
Total 27 0 9 0 80 36 0 0 0 15 53 2 222
03:00 PM 10 0 4 0 31 11 0 0 0 6 36 1 99
03:15 PM 11 0 5 1 22 11 0 0 0 9 32 1 92
03:30 PM 14 0 6 0 38 13 0 0 0 4 37 0 112
03:45 PM 20 0 5 0 33 5 0 0 0 5 36 0 104
Total 55 0 20 1 124 40 0 0 0 24 141 2 407
04:00 PM 10 0 3 0 42 7 0 0 0 3 32 0 97
04:15 PM 14 0 5 0 16 11 0 0 0 2 20 2 70
04:30 PM 13 0 4 0 20 12 0 0 0 7 27 0 83
04:45 PM 14 0 5 0 23 11 0 0 0 8 28 0 89
Total 51 0 17 0 101 41 0 0 0 20 107 2 339
05:00 PM 15 0 1 1 25 17 0 0 0 8 24 0 91
05:15 PM 11 0 6 1 32 9 0 0 0 2 33 0 94
05:30 PM 15 0 7 0 33 12 0 0 0 1 20 0 88
05:45 PM 11 0 4 0 35 12 0 0 0 4 26 0 92
Total 52 0 18 2 125 50 0 0 0 15 103 0 365
06:00 PM 9 0 2 0 29 8 0 0 0 4 22 0 74
06:15 PM 9 1 7 0 29 8 0 0 0 1 24 1 80
06:30 PM 1 0 1 0 22 4 0 0 0 4 24 0 56
06:45 PM 8 0 1 0 38 12 0 0 0 2 27 0 88
Total 27 1 11 0 118 32 0 0 0 11 97 1 298
Grand Total 275 3 136 6 845 271 0 0 0 109 681 8 2334
Apprch % 66.4 0.7 32.9 0.5 75.3 24.2 0 0 0 13.7 85.3 1
Total % 11.8 0.1 5.8 0.3 36.2 11.6 0 0 0 4.7 29.2 0.3

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay(ConnectorRoad)_SterlingWay
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Sterling Way (Connector
Road)
Southbound
Sterling Way
Westbound
Car Wash Driveway
Northbound
Sterling Way
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 5 0 11 16 0 37 8 45 0 0 0 0 1 17 1 19 80
07:30 AM 11 0 15 26 0 49 12 61 0 0 0 0 4 24 0 28 115
07:45 AM 13 0 8 21 0 55 10 65 0 0 0 0 4 47 0 51 137
08:00 AM 9 1 3 13 0 64 7 71 0 0 0 0 5 32 0 37 121
Total Volume 38 1 37 76 0 205 37 242 0 0 0 0 14 120 1 135 453 % App. Total 50 1.3 48.7 0 84.7 15.3 0 0 0 10.4 88.9 0.7 PHF .731 .250 .617 .731 .000 .801 .771 .852 .000 .000 .000 .000 .700 .638 .250 .662 .827 Sterling Way (Connector Road)
Sterling Way
Sterling Way
Car Wash Driveway
Right
37 Thru
1 Left
38 InOut Total
51 76 127
Right
37 Thru
205
Left
0 OutTotal In
158 242 400
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out TotalIn
2 0 2
Left
14 Thru
120
Right
1 TotalOut In
242 135 377
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay(ConnectorRoad)_SterlingWay
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Sterling Way (Connector
Road)
Southbound
Sterling Way
Westbound
Car Wash Driveway
Northbound
Sterling Way
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:00 PM
03:00 PM 10 0 4 14 0 31 11 42 0 0 0 0 6 36 1 43 99
03:15 PM 11 0 5 16 1 22 11 34 0 0 0 0 9 32 1 42 92
03:30 PM 14 0 6 20 0 38 13 51 0 0 0 0 4 37 0 41 112
03:45 PM 20 0 5 25 0 33 5 38 0 0 0 0 5 36 0 41 104
Total Volume 55 0 20 75 1 124 40 165 0 0 0 0 24 141 2 167 407 % App. Total 73.3 0 26.7 0.6 75.2 24.2 0 0 0 14.4 84.4 1.2 PHF .688 .000 .833 .750 .250 .816 .769 .809 .000 .000 .000 .000 .667 .953 .500 .971 .908 Sterling Way (Connector Road)
Sterling Way
Sterling Way
Car Wash Driveway
Right
20 Thru
0 Left
55 InOut Total
64 75 139
Right
40 Thru
124
Left
1 OutTotal In
196 165 361
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out TotalIn
3 0 3
Left
24 Thru
141
Right
2 TotalOut In
144 167 311
Peak Hour Begins at 03:00 PM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay(ConnectorRoad)_SterlingWay_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Sterling Way
(Connector Road)
Southbound
Sterling Way
Westbound
Car Wash Driveway
Northbound
Sterling Way
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:15 AM 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
07:30 AM 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
07:45 AM 0 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 9
Total 0 18 0 4 0 0 0 0 22
08:00 AM 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 7
08:15 AM 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 8
08:30 AM 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 5
08:45 AM 1 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 9
Total 1 22 0 5 0 0 0 1 29
09:00 AM 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 1 9
09:15 AM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 4
09:30 AM 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
09:45 AM 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 5
Total 5 10 0 4 0 0 0 1 20
03:00 PM 2 8 0 2 0 0 0 5 17
03:15 PM 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3
03:30 PM 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 7
03:45 PM 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Total 7 18 0 4 0 0 0 5 34
04:00 PM 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 5
04:15 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
04:30 PM 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
04:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2
Total 0 14 0 1 0 0 0 1 16
05:00 PM 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 5
05:15 PM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
05:30 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
05:45 PM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Total 3 12 0 0 0 0 1 0 16
06:00 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
06:45 PM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
Total 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
Grand Total 17 96 0 19 0 0 1 8 141
Apprch % 15 85 0 100 0 0 11.1 88.9
Total % 12.1 68.1 0 13.5 0 0 0.7 5.7

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay(ConnectorRoad)_SterlingWay_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Sterling Way (Connector
Road)
Southbound
Sterling Way
Westbound
Car Wash Driveway
Northbound
Sterling Way
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:15 AM
08:15 AM 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 8
08:30 AM 0 4 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
08:45 AM 1 6 7 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
09:00 AM 1 6 7 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 9
Total Volume 2 23 25 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 2 2 31
% App. Total 8 92 0 100 0 0 0 100
PHF .500 .821 .893 .000 .500 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .500 .861 Sterling Way (Connector Road)
Sterling Way
Sterling Way
Car Wash Driveway
Thru
2 Peds
23 InOut Total
0 25 25
Thru
0 Peds
4 OutTotal In
0 4 4
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out TotalIn
2 0 2
Thru
0 Peds
2 TotalOut In
0 2 2
Peak Hour Begins at 08:15 AM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay(ConnectorRoad)_SterlingWay_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Sterling Way (Connector
Road)
Southbound
Sterling Way
Westbound
Car Wash Driveway
Northbound
Sterling Way
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.

Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:00 PM
03:00 PM 2 8 10 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 17
03:15 PM 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
03:30 PM 4 2 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
03:45 PM 1 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Total Volume 7 18 25 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 5 5 34
% App. Total 28 72 0 100 0 0 0 100
PHF .438 .563 .625 .000 .500 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .250 .500 Sterling Way (Connector Road)
Sterling Way
Sterling Way
Car Wash Driveway
Thru
7 Peds
18 InOut Total
0 25 25
Thru
0 Peds
4 OutTotal In
0 4 4
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out TotalIn
7 0 7
Thru
0 Peds
5 TotalOut In
0 5 5
Peak Hour Begins at 03:00 PM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay_MaineAve
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Vehicles
Sterling Way
Southbound
Maine Avenue
Westbound
Church/School Driveway
Northbound
Maine Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 10 3 1 0 14 24 0 0 0 3 13 0 68
07:15 AM 19 2 3 1 20 33 0 0 0 13 24 3 118
07:30 AM 29 1 4 3 46 51 0 0 0 12 38 1 185
07:45 AM 46 4 8 2 48 50 0 0 0 14 56 4 232
Total 104 10 16 6 128 158 0 0 0 42 131 8 603
08:00 AM 30 3 4 4 41 54 5 6 4 10 32 4 197
08:15 AM 19 2 5 2 27 35 0 1 2 10 20 1 124
08:30 AM 27 0 5 1 13 23 1 1 0 2 14 0 87
08:45 AM 14 0 2 0 17 27 0 0 0 7 23 1 91
Total 90 5 16 7 98 139 6 8 6 29 89 6 499
09:00 AM 12 0 3 1 18 23 0 0 1 6 20 0 84
09:15 AM 7 1 4 0 12 29 0 0 1 6 22 0 82
09:30 AM 15 0 5 0 22 32 0 0 0 4 24 0 102
09:45 AM 17 1 8 1 21 29 0 0 1 4 27 0 109
Total 51 2 20 2 73 113 0 0 3 20 93 0 377
03:00 PM 32 1 9 0 38 28 0 1 0 5 38 0 152
03:15 PM 38 1 9 1 21 30 0 4 0 7 40 0 151
03:30 PM 41 1 8 0 41 39 0 1 1 8 29 1 170
03:45 PM 40 2 11 1 39 27 1 2 0 9 34 0 166
Total 151 5 37 2 139 124 1 8 1 29 141 1 639
04:00 PM 30 3 8 0 39 34 1 3 0 5 28 2 153
04:15 PM 22 2 11 0 39 26 0 2 0 8 22 0 132
04:30 PM 31 0 10 0 33 19 1 2 2 6 29 0 133
04:45 PM 30 1 4 0 27 23 0 1 0 7 25 0 118
Total 113 6 33 0 138 102 2 8 2 26 104 2 536
05:00 PM 38 1 11 0 26 30 1 1 0 10 26 0 144
05:15 PM 37 0 6 1 30 29 0 0 0 6 19 0 128
05:30 PM 21 0 10 1 38 39 0 1 0 8 25 0 143
05:45 PM 38 0 9 0 33 35 0 1 0 7 25 0 148
Total 134 1 36 2 127 133 1 3 0 31 95 0 563
06:00 PM 24 1 6 0 31 31 0 0 0 8 30 0 131
06:15 PM 31 1 5 0 24 41 0 1 0 4 15 0 122
06:30 PM 17 0 5 0 32 19 0 0 0 6 23 0 102
06:45 PM 21 2 7 0 35 32 0 0 0 9 23 0 129
Total 93 4 23 0 122 123 0 1 0 27 91 0 484
Grand Total 736 33 181 19 825 892 10 28 12 204 744 17 3701 Apprch % 77.5 3.5 19.1 1.1 47.5 51.4 20 56 24 21.1 77.1 1.8 Total % 19.9 0.9 4.9 0.5 22.3 24.1 0.3 0.8 0.3 5.5 20.1 0.5

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay_MaineAve
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Sterling Way
Southbound
Maine Avenue
Westbound
Church/School Driveway
Northbound
Maine Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 29 1 4 34 3 46 51 100 0 0 0 0 12 38 1 51 185
07:45 AM 46 4 8 58 2 48 50 100 0 0 0 0 14 56 4 74 232
08:00 AM 30 3 4 37 4 41 54 99 5 6 4 15 10 32 4 46 197
08:15 AM 19 2 5 26 2 27 35 64 0 1 2 3 10 20 1 31 124
Total Volume 124 10 21 155 11 162 190 363 5 7 6 18 46 146 10 202 738 % App. Total 80 6.5 13.5 3 44.6 52.3 27.8 38.9 33.3 22.8 72.3 5 PHF .674 .625 .656 .668 .688 .844 .880 .908 .250 .292 .375 .300 .821 .652 .625 .682 .795 Sterling Way
Maine Avenue
Maine Avenue
Church/School Driveway
Right
21 Thru
10 Left
124
InOut Total
243 155 398
Right
190
Thru
162
Left
11 OutTotal In
276 363 639
Left
5 Thru
7 Right
6 Out TotalIn
31 18 49
Left
46 Thru
146
Right
10 TotalOut In
188 202 390
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay_MaineAve
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Sterling Way
Southbound
Maine Avenue
Westbound
Church/School Driveway
Northbound
Maine Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:15 PM
03:15 PM 38 1 9 48 1 21 30 52 0 4 0 4 7 40 0 47 151
03:30 PM 41 1 8 50 0 41 39 80 0 1 1 2 8 29 1 38 170
03:45 PM 40 2 11 53 1 39 27 67 1 2 0 3 9 34 0 43 166
04:00 PM 30 3 8 41 0 39 34 73 1 3 0 4 5 28 2 35 153
Total Volume 149 7 36 192 2 140 130 272 2 10 1 13 29 131 3 163 640 % App. Total 77.6 3.6 18.8 0.7 51.5 47.8 15.4 76.9 7.7 17.8 80.4 1.8 PHF .909 .583 .818 .906 .500 .854 .833 .850 .500 .625 .250 .813 .806 .819 .375 .867 .941 Sterling Way
Maine Avenue
Maine Avenue
Church/School Driveway
Right
36 Thru
7 Left
149
InOut Total
169 192 361
Right
130
Thru
140
Left
2 OutTotal In
281 272 553
Left
2 Thru
10 Right
1 Out TotalIn
12 13 25
Left
29 Thru
131
Right
3 TotalOut In
178 163 341
Peak Hour Begins at 03:15 PM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay_MaineAve_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Sterling Way
Southbound
Maine Avenue
Westbound
Church/School
Driveway
Northbound
Maine Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
07:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
07:45 AM 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Total 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
08:00 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
08:15 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:30 AM 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
08:45 AM 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Total 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
09:00 AM 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
09:15 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
09:30 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
09:45 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
03:00 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
03:15 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
03:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
04:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
04:30 PM 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
05:00 PM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
05:30 PM 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Total 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
06:00 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Grand Total 2 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 50
Apprch % 4 96 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total % 4 96 0 0 0 0 0 0

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay_MaineAve_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Sterling Way
Southbound
Maine Avenue
Westbound
Church/School Driveway
Northbound
Maine Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:30 AM
08:30 AM 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
08:45 AM 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
09:00 AM 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
09:15 AM 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total Volume 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .938 .938 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .938 Sterling Way
Maine Avenue
Maine Avenue
Church/School Driveway
Thru
0 Peds
15 InOut Total
0 15 15
Thru
0 Peds
0 OutTotal In
0 0 0
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out TotalIn
0 0 0
Thru
0 Peds
0 TotalOut In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 08:30 AM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : SterlingWay_MaineAve_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Sterling Way
Southbound
Maine Avenue
Westbound
Church/School Driveway
Northbound
Maine Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.

Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:00 PM 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:30 PM 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Total Volume 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .400 .400 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .400 Sterling Way
Maine Avenue
Maine Avenue
Church/School Driveway
Thru
0 Peds
8 InOut Total
0 8 8
Thru
0 Peds
0 OutTotal In
0 0 0
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out TotalIn
0 0 0
Thru
0 Peds
0 TotalOut In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : CesarChavezDr_RamonaBlvd
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Vehicles
Cesar Chavez Drive
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 2 0 3 0 189 1 0 0 0 3 79 0 277
07:15 AM 2 0 3 0 188 0 0 0 0 5 113 0 311
07:30 AM 1 0 6 0 261 0 0 0 0 4 146 0 418
07:45 AM 1 0 3 0 239 5 0 0 0 9 176 0 433
Total 6 0 15 0 877 6 0 0 0 21 514 0 1439
08:00 AM 4 0 5 0 206 2 0 0 0 11 169 0 397
08:15 AM 1 0 3 0 202 5 0 0 0 7 141 0 359
08:30 AM 3 0 8 0 168 0 0 0 0 7 109 0 295
08:45 AM 0 0 5 0 149 1 0 0 0 7 132 0 294
Total 8 0 21 0 725 8 0 0 0 32 551 0 1345
09:00 AM 6 0 3 0 119 2 0 0 0 12 112 0 254
09:15 AM 0 0 5 0 141 1 0 0 0 7 104 0 258
09:30 AM 2 0 10 0 123 1 0 0 0 2 120 0 258
09:45 AM 1 0 5 0 146 1 0 0 0 7 135 0 295
Total 9 0 23 0 529 5 0 0 0 28 471 0 1065
03:00 PM 7 0 9 0 171 0 0 0 0 8 271 0 466
03:15 PM 4 0 8 0 179 1 0 0 0 12 233 0 437
03:30 PM 6 0 13 0 160 0 0 0 0 9 216 0 404
03:45 PM 8 0 6 0 193 0 0 0 0 10 232 0 449
Total 25 0 36 0 703 1 0 0 0 39 952 0 1756
04:00 PM 4 0 5 0 153 1 0 0 0 7 211 0 381
04:15 PM 8 0 9 0 190 2 0 0 0 13 231 0 453
04:30 PM 7 0 8 0 171 2 0 0 0 5 223 0 416
04:45 PM 9 0 18 0 173 3 0 0 0 11 268 0 482
Total 28 0 40 0 687 8 0 0 0 36 933 0 1732
05:00 PM 8 0 13 0 152 1 0 0 0 8 236 0 418
05:15 PM 4 0 18 0 192 3 0 0 0 14 207 0 438
05:30 PM 3 0 10 0 182 1 0 0 0 15 228 0 439
05:45 PM 6 0 16 0 171 0 0 0 0 17 227 0 437
Total 21 0 57 0 697 5 0 0 0 54 898 0 1732
06:00 PM 5 0 9 0 159 1 0 0 0 9 218 0 401
06:15 PM 4 0 7 0 163 1 0 0 0 5 215 0 395
06:30 PM 6 0 5 0 124 0 0 0 0 6 165 0 306
06:45 PM 1 0 8 0 118 0 0 0 0 9 200 0 336
Total 16 0 29 0 564 2 0 0 0 29 798 0 1438
Grand Total 113 0 221 0 4782 35 0 0 0 239 5117 0 10507
Apprch % 33.8 0 66.2 0 99.3 0.7 0 0 0 4.5 95.5 0
Total % 1.1 0 2.1 0 45.5 0.3 0 0 0 2.3 48.7 0

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : CesarChavezDr_RamonaBlvd
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Cesar Chavez Drive
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 1 0 6 7 0 261 0 261 0 0 0 0 4 146 0 150 418
07:45 AM 1 0 3 4 0 239 5 244 0 0 0 0 9 176 0 185 433
08:00 AM 4 0 5 9 0 206 2 208 0 0 0 0 11 169 0 180 397
08:15 AM 1 0 3 4 0 202 5 207 0 0 0 0 7 141 0 148 359
Total Volume 7 0 17 24 0 908 12 920 0 0 0 0 31 632 0 663 1607 % App. Total 29.2 0 70.8 0 98.7 1.3 0 0 0 4.7 95.3 0 PHF .438 .000 .708 .667 .000 .870 .600 .881 .000 .000 .000 .000 .705 .898 .000 .896 .928 Cesar Chavez Drive
Ramona Blvd
Ramona Blvd

Right
17 Thru
0 Left
7 InOut Total
43 24 67
Right
12 Thru
908
Left
0 OutTotal In
639 920 1559
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out TotalIn
0 0 0
Left
31 Thru
632
Right
0 TotalOut In
925 663 1588
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : CesarChavezDr_RamonaBlvd
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Cesar Chavez Drive
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 9 0 18 27 0 173 3 176 0 0 0 0 11 268 0 279 482 05:00 PM 8 0 13 21 0 152 1 153 0 0 0 0 8 236 0 244 418
05:15 PM 4 0 18 22 0 192 3 195 0 0 0 0 14 207 0 221 438 05:30 PM 3 0 10 13 0 182 1 183 0 0 0 0 15 228 0 243 439 Total Volume 24 0 59 83 0 699 8 707 0 0 0 0 48 939 0 987 1777 % App. Total 28.9 0 71.1 0 98.9 1.1 0 0 0 4.9 95.1 0 PHF .667 .000 .819 .769 .000 .910 .667 .906 .000 .000 .000 .000 .800 .876 .000 .884 .922 Cesar Chavez Drive
Ramona Blvd
Ramona Blvd

Right
59 Thru
0 Left
24 InOut Total
56 83 139
Right
8 Thru
699
Left
0 OutTotal In
963 707 1670
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 Out TotalIn
0 0 0
Left
48 Thru
939
Right
0 TotalOut In
758 987 1745
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : CesarChavezDr_RamonaBlvd_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Cesar Chavez Drive
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 4
07:15 AM 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
07:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
07:45 AM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 5
Total 0 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 14
08:00 AM 0 2 0 7 0 0 0 0 9
08:15 AM 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
08:30 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
08:45 AM 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 5
Total 3 4 0 13 0 0 0 0 20
09:00 AM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4
09:15 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
09:30 AM 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
09:45 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3
Total 1 3 0 10 0 0 0 0 14
03:00 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4
03:15 PM 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
03:30 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
03:45 PM 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7
Total 2 3 0 12 0 0 0 0 17
04:00 PM 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 6
04:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
04:30 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
Total 0 2 0 7 0 0 0 0 9
05:00 PM 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4
05:15 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 3
05:30 PM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
05:45 PM 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 7
Total 3 5 0 7 0 0 0 1 16
06:00 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4
06:15 PM 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 4
06:30 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
06:45 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
Total 0 2 0 9 0 0 0 0 11
Grand Total 9 25 0 66 0 0 0 1 101
Apprch % 26.5 73.5 0 100 0 0 0 100
Total % 8.9 24.8 0 65.3 0 0 0 1

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : CesarChavezDr_RamonaBlvd_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Cesar Chavez Drive
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
08:00 AM 0 2 2 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
08:15 AM 2 1 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
08:30 AM 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total Volume 2 4 6 0 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
% App. Total 33.3 66.7 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .250 .500 .500 .000 .500 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .556 Cesar Chavez Drive
Ramona Blvd
Ramona Blvd

Thru
2 Peds
4 InOut Total
0 6 6
Thru
0 Peds
14 OutTotal In
0 14 14
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out TotalIn
2 0 2
Thru
0 Peds
0 TotalOut In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : CesarChavezDr_RamonaBlvd_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Cesar Chavez Drive
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.

Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:15 PM
03:15 PM 0 3 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
03:30 PM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
04:00 PM 0 2 2 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
Total Volume 2 5 7 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 19
% App. Total 28.6 71.4 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .250 .417 .583 .000 .429 .429 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .679 Cesar Chavez Drive
Ramona Blvd
Ramona Blvd

Thru
2 Peds
5 InOut Total
0 7 7
Thru
0 Peds
12 OutTotal In
0 12 12
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out TotalIn
2 0 2
Thru
0 Peds
0 TotalOut In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 03:15 PM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : MaineAve_RamonaBlvd
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Vehicles
Maine Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound
Maine Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 6 63 15 8 170 11 15 70 4 10 67 19 458
07:15 AM 12 74 6 4 162 12 19 81 6 10 78 40 504
07:30 AM 6 81 14 16 234 11 24 84 9 25 96 30 630
07:45 AM 19 77 11 14 195 25 19 97 11 25 109 33 635
Total 43 295 46 42 761 59 77 332 30 70 350 122 2227
08:00 AM 19 101 12 25 159 20 24 101 13 26 122 25 647
08:15 AM 6 57 16 12 147 7 21 93 8 28 89 29 513
08:30 AM 7 77 10 13 143 9 23 54 14 13 81 23 467
08:45 AM 6 56 16 10 113 8 18 69 18 26 84 19 443
Total 38 291 54 60 562 44 86 317 53 93 376 96 2070
09:00 AM 2 51 18 12 81 17 19 69 17 26 83 19 414
09:15 AM 14 51 21 10 102 9 23 69 13 30 74 22 438
09:30 AM 14 78 16 23 105 8 20 61 20 27 78 27 477
09:45 AM 5 45 24 19 86 4 30 59 22 38 95 29 456
Total 35 225 79 64 374 38 92 258 72 121 330 97 1785
03:00 PM 13 79 24 27 115 16 31 76 31 52 212 33 709
03:15 PM 19 86 15 23 118 23 29 75 30 39 166 38 661
03:30 PM 13 107 17 39 126 13 24 96 18 34 170 44 701
03:45 PM 16 74 14 32 156 12 23 81 21 41 175 45 690
Total 61 346 70 121 515 64 107 328 100 166 723 160 2761 04:00 PM 12 69 15 21 101 12 22 72 26 37 155 36 578
04:15 PM 16 99 18 35 130 13 33 85 15 35 171 45 695
04:30 PM 8 86 18 34 114 18 29 79 16 51 174 44 671
04:45 PM 12 73 25 20 123 19 22 72 17 41 181 49 654
Total 48 327 76 110 468 62 106 308 74 164 681 174 2598
05:00 PM 14 85 17 35 117 10 26 75 15 33 200 53 680
05:15 PM 15 89 24 20 118 9 31 97 16 33 150 39 641
05:30 PM 17 79 15 35 141 7 24 88 15 39 170 39 669
05:45 PM 15 98 14 22 107 13 36 85 22 33 163 42 650
Total 61 351 70 112 483 39 117 345 68 138 683 173 2640
06:00 PM 13 87 19 19 107 16 23 89 17 39 163 43 635
06:15 PM 15 93 14 25 107 16 30 76 16 36 141 43 612
06:30 PM 18 74 12 26 85 8 21 83 17 25 137 42 548
06:45 PM 10 82 18 37 57 12 36 72 8 44 143 35 554
Total 56 336 63 107 356 52 110 320 58 144 584 163 2349
Grand Total 342 2171 458 616 3519 358 695 2208 455 896 3727 985 16430 Apprch % 11.5 73.1 15.4 13.7 78.3 8 20.7 65.8 13.5 16 66.5 17.6 Total % 2.1 13.2 2.8 3.7 21.4 2.2 4.2 13.4 2.8 5.5 22.7 6

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : MaineAve_RamonaBlvd
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Maine Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound
Maine Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 6 81 14 101 16 234 11 261 24 84 9 117 25 96 30 151 630 07:45 AM 19 77 11 107 14 195 25 234 19 97 11 127 25 109 33 167 635 08:00 AM 19 101 12 132 25 159 20 204 24 101 13 138 26 122 25 173 647 08:15 AM 6 57 16 79 12 147 7 166 21 93 8 122 28 89 29 146 513 Total Volume 50 316 53 419 67 735 63 865 88 375 41 504 104 416 117 637 2425 % App. Total 11.9 75.4 12.6 7.7 85 7.3 17.5 74.4 8.1 16.3 65.3 18.4 PHF .658 .782 .828 .794 .670 .785 .630 .829 .917 .928 .788 .913 .929 .852 .886 .921 .937 Maine Avenue
Ramona Blvd
Ramona Blvd
Maine Avenue
Right
53 Thru
316
Left
50 InOut Total
542 419 961
Right
63 Thru
735
Left
67 OutTotal In
507 865 1372
Left
88 Thru
375
Right
41 Out TotalIn
500 504 1004
Left
104
Thru
416
Right
117
TotalOut In
876 637 1513
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : MaineAve_RamonaBlvd
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Maine Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound
Maine Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:00 PM
03:00 PM 13 79 24 116 27 115 16 158 31 76 31 138 52 212 33 297 709 03:15 PM 19 86 15 120 23 118 23 164 29 75 30 134 39 166 38 243 661 03:30 PM 13 107 17 137 39 126 13 178 24 96 18 138 34 170 44 248 701 03:45 PM 16 74 14 104 32 156 12 200 23 81 21 125 41 175 45 261 690 Total Volume 61 346 70 477 121 515 64 700 107 328 100 535 166 723 160 1049 2761 % App. Total 12.8 72.5 14.7 17.3 73.6 9.1 20 61.3 18.7 15.8 68.9 15.3 PHF .803 .808 .729 .870 .776 .825 .696 .875 .863 .854 .806 .969 .798 .853 .889 .883 .974 Maine Avenue
Ramona Blvd
Ramona Blvd
Maine Avenue
Right
70 Thru
346
Left
61 InOut Total
558 477 1035
Right
64 Thru
515
Left
121
OutTotal In
884 700 1584
Left
107
Thru
328
Right
100
Out TotalIn
627 535 1162
Left
166
Thru
723
Right
160
TotalOut In
692 1049 1741
Peak Hour Begins at 03:00 PM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : MaineAve_RamonaBlvd_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Maine Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound
Maine Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 1 2 0 6 0 0 0 1 10
07:15 AM 1 1 0 1 0 6 1 0 10
07:30 AM 1 4 0 1 0 3 1 2 12
07:45 AM 3 1 2 2 0 3 0 1 12
Total 6 8 2 10 0 12 2 4 44
08:00 AM 1 0 1 6 0 0 0 4 12
08:15 AM 2 3 1 1 2 5 3 5 22
08:30 AM 0 1 0 6 1 7 3 2 20
08:45 AM 2 1 0 3 0 3 0 2 11
Total 5 5 2 16 3 15 6 13 65
09:00 AM 3 3 1 2 1 1 2 4 17
09:15 AM 2 1 1 5 0 3 1 3 16
09:30 AM 2 2 1 2 0 2 0 7 16
09:45 AM 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 1 8
Total 7 8 3 11 1 8 4 15 57
03:00 PM 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 2 8
03:15 PM 1 7 0 6 1 1 0 6 22
03:30 PM 1 4 0 7 2 6 1 3 24
03:45 PM 0 13 1 12 1 9 0 4 40
Total 3 24 1 27 4 19 1 15 94
04:00 PM 1 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 16
04:15 PM 2 5 0 11 0 5 0 6 29
04:30 PM 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 3 8
04:45 PM 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 12
Total 3 7 2 20 3 13 2 15 65
05:00 PM 2 3 1 5 0 3 0 8 22
05:15 PM 0 9 0 9 2 1 0 10 31
05:30 PM 1 8 2 10 3 2 2 5 33
05:45 PM 1 7 0 0 1 0 0 3 12
Total 4 27 3 24 6 6 2 26 98
06:00 PM 1 5 1 2 2 0 1 1 13
06:15 PM 2 8 1 6 0 1 1 8 27
06:30 PM 1 8 0 4 0 1 0 5 19
06:45 PM 0 3 0 7 3 5 0 3 21
Total 4 24 2 19 5 7 2 17 80
Grand Total 32 103 15 127 22 80 19 105 503
Apprch % 23.7 76.3 10.6 89.4 21.6 78.4 15.3 84.7
Total % 6.4 20.5 3 25.2 4.4 15.9 3.8 20.9

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : MaineAve_RamonaBlvd_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Maine Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound
Maine Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:15 AM
08:15 AM 2 3 5 1 1 2 2 5 7 3 5 8 22
08:30 AM 0 1 1 0 6 6 1 7 8 3 2 5 20
08:45 AM 2 1 3 0 3 3 0 3 3 0 2 2 11
09:00 AM 3 3 6 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 4 6 17
Total Volume 7 8 15 2 12 14 4 16 20 8 13 21 70
% App. Total 46.7 53.3 14.3 85.7 20 80 38.1 61.9
PHF .583 .667 .625 .500 .500 .583 .500 .571 .625 .667 .650 .656 .795 Maine Avenue
Ramona Blvd
Ramona Blvd
Maine Avenue
Thru
7 Peds
8 InOut Total
4 15 19
Thru
2 Peds
12 OutTotal In
8 14 22
Thru
4 Peds
16 Out TotalIn
7 20 27
Thru
8 Peds
13 TotalOut In
2 21 23
Peak Hour Begins at 08:15 AM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : MaineAve_RamonaBlvd_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Maine Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Blvd
Westbound
Maine Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.

Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:30 PM
03:30 PM 1 4 5 0 7 7 2 6 8 1 3 4 24
03:45 PM 0 13 13 1 12 13 1 9 10 0 4 4 40
04:00 PM 1 2 3 2 2 4 3 2 5 2 2 4 16
04:15 PM 2 5 7 0 11 11 0 5 5 0 6 6 29
Total Volume 4 24 28 3 32 35 6 22 28 3 15 18 109
% App. Total 14.3 85.7 8.6 91.4 21.4 78.6 16.7 83.3
PHF .500 .462 .538 .375 .667 .673 .500 .611 .700 .375 .625 .750 .681 Maine Avenue
Ramona Blvd
Ramona Blvd
Maine Avenue
Thru
4 Peds
24 InOut Total
6 28 34
Thru
3 Peds
32 OutTotal In
3 35 38
Thru
6 Peds
22 Out TotalIn
4 28 32
Thru
3 Peds
15 TotalOut In
3 18 21
Peak Hour Begins at 03:30 PM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : MaineAve_Alleyway
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Vehicles
Maine Avenue
Southbound
BPPD Driveway
Westbound
Maine Avenue
Northbound
Alleyway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 96 1 0 0 0 0 89 0 0 0 0 186
07:15 AM 0 121 1 3 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 235
07:30 AM 0 128 1 0 0 0 0 120 1 0 0 0 250
07:45 AM 0 121 3 0 0 0 0 127 0 0 0 0 251
Total 0 466 6 3 0 0 0 446 1 0 0 0 922
08:00 AM 0 155 3 2 0 0 0 141 0 0 0 0 301
08:15 AM 0 102 2 1 0 0 0 123 1 0 0 0 229
08:30 AM 0 118 4 0 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 0 215
08:45 AM 1 83 4 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 0 0 192
Total 1 458 13 3 0 0 0 461 1 0 0 0 937
09:00 AM 0 86 3 0 0 1 0 103 1 0 0 0 194
09:15 AM 0 84 1 2 0 0 0 103 1 0 0 0 191
09:30 AM 0 131 1 0 0 1 0 101 0 0 0 0 234
09:45 AM 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 106 0 0 0 0 205
Total 0 400 5 2 0 2 0 413 2 0 0 0 824
03:00 PM 0 138 1 0 0 0 0 138 5 0 0 0 282
03:15 PM 0 159 0 0 0 0 0 136 1 0 0 0 296
03:30 PM 0 191 2 4 0 1 0 137 2 0 0 0 337
03:45 PM 0 155 3 0 0 0 0 127 0 0 0 0 285
Total 0 643 6 4 0 1 0 538 8 0 0 0 1200
04:00 PM 0 126 4 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 255
04:15 PM 0 171 1 0 0 0 0 127 0 0 0 0 299
04:30 PM 0 177 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0 0 303
04:45 PM 0 144 2 1 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 267
Total 0 618 7 1 0 0 0 498 0 0 0 0 1124
05:00 PM 0 175 2 0 0 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 294
05:15 PM 0 166 3 0 0 1 0 148 0 0 0 0 318
05:30 PM 0 158 1 0 0 0 0 127 0 0 0 0 286
05:45 PM 0 168 0 0 0 0 0 139 0 0 0 0 307
Total 0 667 6 0 0 1 0 531 0 0 0 0 1205
06:00 PM 0 166 0 0 0 0 0 131 0 0 0 0 297
06:15 PM 0 163 1 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 289
06:30 PM 1 142 1 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 269
06:45 PM 0 145 1 0 0 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 255
Total 1 616 3 0 0 0 0 490 0 0 0 0 1110
Grand Total 2 3868 46 13 0 4 0 3377 12 0 0 0 7322
Apprch % 0.1 98.8 1.2 76.5 0 23.5 0 99.6 0.4 0 0 0
Total % 0 52.8 0.6 0.2 0 0.1 0 46.1 0.2 0 0 0

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : MaineAve_Alleyway
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Maine Avenue
Southbound
BPPD Driveway
Westbound
Maine Avenue
Northbound
Alleyway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 121 1 122 3 0 0 3 0 110 0 110 0 0 0 0 235
07:30 AM 0 128 1 129 0 0 0 0 0 120 1 121 0 0 0 0 250
07:45 AM 0 121 3 124 0 0 0 0 0 127 0 127 0 0 0 0 251
08:00 AM 0 155 3 158 2 0 0 2 0 141 0 141 0 0 0 0 301
Total Volume 0 525 8 533 5 0 0 5 0 498 1 499 0 0 0 0 1037 % App. Total 0 98.5 1.5 100 0 0 0 99.8 0.2 0 0 0
PHF .000 .847 .667 .843 .417 .000 .000 .417 .000 .883 .250 .885 .000 .000 .000 .000 .861 Maine Avenue
Alleyway
BPPD Driveway
Maine Avenue
Right
8 Thru
525
Left
0 InOut Total
498 533 1031
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
5 OutTotal In
1 5 6
Left
0 Thru
498
Right
1 Out TotalIn
530 499 1029
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 TotalOut In
8 0 8
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : MaineAve_Alleyway
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Maine Avenue
Southbound
BPPD Driveway
Westbound
Maine Avenue
Northbound
Alleyway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 01:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:15 PM
05:15 PM 0 166 3 169 0 0 1 1 0 148 0 148 0 0 0 0 318
05:30 PM 0 158 1 159 0 0 0 0 0 127 0 127 0 0 0 0 286
05:45 PM 0 168 0 168 0 0 0 0 0 139 0 139 0 0 0 0 307
06:00 PM 0 166 0 166 0 0 0 0 0 131 0 131 0 0 0 0 297
Total Volume 0 658 4 662 0 0 1 1 0 545 0 545 0 0 0 0 1208 % App. Total 0 99.4 0.6 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .979 .333 .979 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .921 .000 .921 .000 .000 .000 .000 .950 Maine Avenue
Alleyway
BPPD Driveway
Maine Avenue
Right
4 Thru
658
Left
0 InOut Total
546 662 1208
Right
1 Thru
0 Left
0 OutTotal In
0 1 1
Left
0 Thru
545
Right
0 Out TotalIn
658 545 1203
Left
0 Thru
0 Right
0 TotalOut In
4 0 4
Peak Hour Begins at 05:15 PM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : MaineAve_Alleyway_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Maine Avenue
Southbound
BPPD Driveway
Westbound
Maine Avenue
Northbound
Alleyway
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 4
07:15 AM 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 6
07:30 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 5
07:45 AM 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 6
Total 0 0 2 13 0 0 2 4 21
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6
08:15 AM 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 5
08:30 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 4 7
08:45 AM 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7
Total 0 1 1 10 0 0 1 12 25
09:00 AM 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 2 6
09:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
09:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 8
09:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3
Total 0 0 2 3 0 0 1 15 21
03:00 PM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 5
03:15 PM 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 2 10
03:30 PM 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 2 10
03:45 PM 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 1 8
Total 0 3 0 18 0 5 0 7 33
04:00 PM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 6
04:15 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4
04:30 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 5
04:45 PM 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7
Total 0 0 0 20 0 0 1 1 22
05:00 PM 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 10
05:15 PM 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 1 14
05:30 PM 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 2 16
05:45 PM 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6
Total 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 3 46
06:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 4
06:15 PM 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 12
06:30 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
06:45 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 6
Total 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 5 24
Grand Total 0 4 5 126 0 5 5 47 192
Apprch % 0 100 3.8 96.2 0 100 9.6 90.4
Total % 0 2.1 2.6 65.6 0 2.6 2.6 24.5

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : MaineAve_Alleyway_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Maine Avenue
Southbound
BPPD Driveway
Westbound
Maine Avenue
Northbound
Alleyway
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 6
08:15 AM 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 2 2 5
08:30 AM 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 4 5 7
08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Total Volume 0 1 1 1 10 11 0 0 0 1 12 13 25
% App. Total 0 100 9.1 90.9 0 0 7.7 92.3
PHF .000 .250 .250 .250 .357 .393 .000 .000 .000 .250 .500 .542 .893 Maine Avenue
Alleyway
BPPD Driveway
Maine Avenue
Thru
0 Peds
1 InOut Total
0 1 1
Thru
1 Peds
10 OutTotal In
1 11 12
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out TotalIn
0 0 0
Thru
1 Peds
12 TotalOut In
1 13 14
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : MaineAve_Alleyway_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Maine Avenue
Southbound
BPPD Driveway
Westbound
Maine Avenue
Northbound
Alleyway
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.

Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 01:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 13 13 0 0 0 0 1 1 14
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 14 14 0 0 0 0 2 2 16
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 44 44 0 0 0 0 3 3 47
% App. Total 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .786 .786 .000 .000 .000 .000 .375 .375 .734 Maine Avenue
Alleyway
BPPD Driveway
Maine Avenue
Thru
0 Peds
0 InOut Total
0 0 0
Thru
0 Peds
44 OutTotal In
0 44 44
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out TotalIn
0 0 0
Thru
0 Peds
3 TotalOut In
0 3 3
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_MaineAve
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Vehicles
Maine Avenue
Southbound Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Maine Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 87 9 0 0 0 30 85 0 5 0 18 234
07:15 AM 0 108 18 0 0 0 40 96 0 8 0 38 308
07:30 AM 0 113 19 0 0 0 83 111 0 6 0 62 394
07:45 AM 0 92 17 0 0 0 80 117 0 10 0 94 410
Total 0 400 63 0 0 0 233 409 0 29 0 212 1346
08:00 AM 0 117 27 0 0 0 82 125 0 14 0 51 416
08:15 AM 0 82 19 0 0 0 45 103 0 12 0 27 288
08:30 AM 0 96 13 0 0 0 33 82 0 11 0 35 270
08:45 AM 0 65 6 0 0 0 33 93 0 12 0 23 232
Total 0 360 65 0 0 0 193 403 0 49 0 136 1206
09:00 AM 0 61 12 0 0 0 32 92 0 14 0 20 231
09:15 AM 0 77 11 0 0 0 30 89 0 14 0 19 240
09:30 AM 0 112 18 0 0 0 32 83 0 18 0 18 281
09:45 AM 0 74 12 0 0 0 41 82 0 18 0 26 253
Total 0 324 53 0 0 0 135 346 0 64 0 83 1005
03:00 PM 0 114 33 0 0 0 39 124 0 14 0 54 378
03:15 PM 0 136 21 0 0 0 30 118 0 17 0 59 381
03:30 PM 0 161 35 0 0 0 55 124 0 15 0 62 452
03:45 PM 0 134 12 0 0 0 47 115 0 11 0 62 381
Total 0 545 101 0 0 0 171 481 0 57 0 237 1592
04:00 PM 0 101 21 0 0 0 50 109 0 13 0 48 342
04:15 PM 0 151 21 0 0 0 35 117 0 10 0 34 368
04:30 PM 0 143 19 0 0 0 32 111 0 11 0 45 361
04:45 PM 0 129 18 0 0 0 33 105 0 15 0 52 352
Total 0 524 79 0 0 0 150 442 0 49 0 179 1423
05:00 PM 0 147 26 0 0 0 32 101 0 15 0 43 364
05:15 PM 0 135 19 0 0 0 35 128 0 11 0 41 369
05:30 PM 0 127 23 0 0 0 45 114 0 13 0 38 360
05:45 PM 0 147 24 0 0 0 49 121 0 17 0 43 401
Total 0 556 92 0 0 0 161 464 0 56 0 165 1494
06:00 PM 0 142 15 0 0 0 48 114 0 16 0 38 373
06:15 PM 0 138 21 0 0 0 41 112 0 11 0 34 357
06:30 PM 0 122 19 0 0 0 30 112 0 10 0 29 322
06:45 PM 0 122 36 0 0 0 38 95 0 10 0 32 333
Total 0 524 91 0 0 0 157 433 0 47 0 133 1385
Grand Total 0 3233 544 0 0 0 1200 2978 0 351 0 1145 9451 Apprch % 0 85.6 14.4 0 0 0 28.7 71.3 0 23.5 0 76.5
Total % 0 34.2 5.8 0 0 0 12.7 31.5 0 3.7 0 12.1

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_MaineAve
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Maine Avenue
Southbound Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Maine Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 108 18 126 0 0 0 0 40 96 0 136 8 0 38 46 308 07:30 AM 0 113 19 132 0 0 0 0 83 111 0 194 6 0 62 68 394 07:45 AM 0 92 17 109 0 0 0 0 80 117 0 197 10 0 94 104 410 08:00 AM 0 117 27 144 0 0 0 0 82 125 0 207 14 0 51 65 416 Total Volume 0 430 81 511 0 0 0 0 285 449 0 734 38 0 245 283 1528 % App. Total 0 84.1 15.9 0 0 0 38.8 61.2 0 13.4 0 86.6 PHF .000 .919 .750 .887 .000 .000 .000 .000 .858 .898 .000 .886 .679 .000 .652 .680 .918 Maine Avenue
Maine Avenue

Pacific Avenue
Right
81 Thru
430
Left
0 InOut Total
487 511 998
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 OutTotal In
0 0 0
Left
285
Thru
449
Right
0 Out TotalIn
675 734 1409
Left
38 Thru
0 Right
245
TotalOut In
366 283 649
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_MaineAve
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Maine Avenue
Southbound Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Maine Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:00 PM
03:00 PM 0 114 33 147 0 0 0 0 39 124 0 163 14 0 54 68 378 03:15 PM 0 136 21 157 0 0 0 0 30 118 0 148 17 0 59 76 381 03:30 PM 0 161 35 196 0 0 0 0 55 124 0 179 15 0 62 77 452 03:45 PM 0 134 12 146 0 0 0 0 47 115 0 162 11 0 62 73 381 Total Volume 0 545 101 646 0 0 0 0 171 481 0 652 57 0 237 294 1592 % App. Total 0 84.4 15.6 0 0 0 26.2 73.8 0 19.4 0 80.6 PHF .000 .846 .721 .824 .000 .000 .000 .000 .777 .970 .000 .911 .838 .000 .956 .955 .881 Maine Avenue
Maine Avenue

Pacific Avenue
Right
101
Thru
545
Left
0 InOut Total
538 646 1184
Right
0 Thru
0 Left
0 OutTotal In
0 0 0
Left
171
Thru
481
Right
0 Out TotalIn
782 652 1434
Left
57 Thru
0 Right
237
TotalOut In
272 294 566
Peak Hour Begins at 03:00 PM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_MaineAve_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Maine Avenue
Southbound Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Maine Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
07:15 AM 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 5
07:30 AM 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 0 6
07:45 AM 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 4
Total 0 1 1 9 0 6 0 0 17
08:00 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
08:15 AM 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 3
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
08:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 5
Total 0 3 0 3 0 6 0 0 12
09:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
09:45 AM 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 3
Total 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 4
03:00 PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
03:15 PM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3
03:30 PM 1 5 0 2 1 1 0 0 10
03:45 PM 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 6
Total 1 8 1 9 1 1 0 0 21
04:00 PM 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
04:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 3
04:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2
04:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2
Total 0 1 0 6 0 3 0 0 10
05:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
05:15 PM 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 4
05:30 PM 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 6
05:45 PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total 2 3 1 6 1 0 0 0 13
06:00 PM 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 3
06:15 PM 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 3
06:30 PM 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 3
06:45 PM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
Total 0 1 3 6 0 1 0 0 11
Grand Total 3 18 6 41 2 18 0 0 88
Apprch % 14.3 85.7 12.8 87.2 10 90 0 0
Total % 3.4 20.5 6.8 46.6 2.3 20.5 0 0

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_MaineAve_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Maine Avenue
Southbound Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Maine Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 5
07:30 AM 0 1 1 0 3 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 6
07:45 AM 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 4
08:00 AM 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total Volume 0 4 4 1 9 10 0 4 4 0 0 0 18
% App. Total 0 100 10 90 0 100 0 0
PHF .000 .333 .333 .250 .563 .625 .000 .500 .500 .000 .000 .000 .750 Maine Avenue
Maine Avenue
Pacific Avenue
Thru
0 Peds
4 InOut Total
0 4 4
Thru
1 Peds
9 OutTotal In
0 10 10
Thru
0 Peds
4 Out TotalIn
0 4 4
Thru
0 Peds
0 TotalOut In
1 0 1
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_MaineAve_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Maine Avenue
Southbound Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Maine Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.

Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:15 PM
03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
03:30 PM 1 5 6 0 2 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 10
03:45 PM 0 2 2 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
04:00 PM 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total Volume 1 8 9 0 11 11 1 1 2 0 0 0 22
% App. Total 11.1 88.9 0 100 50 50 0 0
PHF .250 .400 .375 .000 .688 .688 .250 .250 .250 .000 .000 .000 .550 Maine Avenue
Maine Avenue

Pacific Avenue
Thru
1 Peds
8 InOut Total
1 9 10
Thru
0 Peds
11 OutTotal In
0 11 11
Thru
1 Peds
1 Out TotalIn
1 2 3
Thru
0 Peds
0 TotalOut In
0 0 0
Peak Hour Begins at 03:15 PM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_BogartAve
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Vehicles
Pacific Avenue
Southbound
Bogart Avenue
Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Telacu Senior Court
Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 2 104 1 2 0 1 0 113 0 0 0 0 223
07:15 AM 10 132 0 5 0 3 0 134 7 0 0 0 291
07:30 AM 6 166 0 4 0 7 0 190 8 0 0 0 381
07:45 AM 9 184 1 6 0 9 2 189 9 2 0 0 411
Total 27 586 2 17 0 20 2 626 24 2 0 0 1306
08:00 AM 10 169 1 1 0 3 1 196 7 0 0 0 388
08:15 AM 7 103 1 3 0 8 1 139 13 0 0 1 276
08:30 AM 2 129 0 1 0 6 0 106 3 0 0 0 247
08:45 AM 5 90 1 4 0 6 0 118 8 1 0 0 233
Total 24 491 3 9 0 23 2 559 31 1 0 1 1144
09:00 AM 6 78 0 3 0 2 0 124 7 3 0 0 223
09:15 AM 4 91 1 4 0 5 0 113 7 1 0 1 227
09:30 AM 3 129 0 4 0 1 0 123 3 1 0 1 265
09:45 AM 6 105 0 1 0 6 0 120 7 0 0 1 246
Total 19 403 1 12 0 14 0 480 24 5 0 3 961
03:00 PM 7 163 0 7 0 8 0 151 10 0 0 1 347
03:15 PM 10 180 1 5 0 4 1 131 6 1 0 0 339
03:30 PM 15 202 0 8 0 14 1 168 9 0 0 0 417
03:45 PM 8 189 0 8 0 8 0 157 1 2 0 0 373
Total 40 734 1 28 0 34 2 607 26 3 0 1 1476
04:00 PM 11 144 0 12 0 13 0 142 9 0 0 0 331
04:15 PM 7 184 0 2 0 9 1 149 8 0 0 3 363
04:30 PM 3 190 0 4 0 12 0 131 6 0 0 0 346
04:45 PM 7 170 0 6 0 2 1 123 7 0 0 1 317
Total 28 688 0 24 0 36 2 545 30 0 0 4 1357
05:00 PM 11 177 0 6 0 5 0 133 5 0 0 0 337
05:15 PM 4 173 2 7 0 9 1 162 7 0 0 0 365
05:30 PM 5 171 0 5 0 9 0 155 7 0 0 0 352
05:45 PM 2 183 1 4 0 10 1 146 6 1 0 0 354
Total 22 704 3 22 0 33 2 596 25 1 0 0 1408
06:00 PM 4 182 1 12 0 11 0 154 6 0 0 1 371
06:15 PM 9 174 2 4 1 15 2 136 7 1 0 0 351
06:30 PM 8 159 0 13 0 4 1 146 15 1 0 0 347
06:45 PM 6 148 0 5 0 4 0 116 7 0 0 0 286
Total 27 663 3 34 1 34 3 552 35 2 0 1 1355
Grand Total 187 4269 13 146 1 194 13 3965 195 14 0 10 9007 Apprch % 4.2 95.5 0.3 42.8 0.3 56.9 0.3 95 4.7 58.3 0 41.7 Total % 2.1 47.4 0.1 1.6 0 2.2 0.1 44 2.2 0.2 0 0.1

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_BogartAve
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Pacific Avenue
Southbound
Bogart Avenue
Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Telacu Senior Court
Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 10 132 0 142 5 0 3 8 0 134 7 141 0 0 0 0 291
07:30 AM 6 166 0 172 4 0 7 11 0 190 8 198 0 0 0 0 381
07:45 AM 9 184 1 194 6 0 9 15 2 189 9 200 2 0 0 2 411
08:00 AM 10 169 1 180 1 0 3 4 1 196 7 204 0 0 0 0 388
Total Volume 35 651 2 688 16 0 22 38 3 709 31 743 2 0 0 2 1471 % App. Total 5.1 94.6 0.3 42.1 0 57.9 0.4 95.4 4.2 100 0 0 PHF .875 .885 .500 .887 .667 .000 .611 .633 .375 .904 .861 .911 .250 .000 .000 .250 .895 Pacific Avenue
Telacu Senior Court Driveway
Bogart Avenue
Pacific Avenue
Right
2 Thru
651
Left
35 InOut Total
733 688 1421
Right
22 Thru
0 Left
16 OutTotal In
66 38 104
Left
3 Thru
709
Right
31 Out TotalIn
667 743 1410
Left
2 Thru
0 Right
0 TotalOut In
5 2 7
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_BogartAve
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Pacific Avenue
Southbound
Bogart Avenue
Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Telacu Senior Court
Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:30 PM
03:30 PM 15 202 0 217 8 0 14 22 1 168 9 178 0 0 0 0 417 03:45 PM 8 189 0 197 8 0 8 16 0 157 1 158 2 0 0 2 373
04:00 PM 11 144 0 155 12 0 13 25 0 142 9 151 0 0 0 0 331 04:15 PM 7 184 0 191 2 0 9 11 1 149 8 158 0 0 3 3 363
Total Volume 41 719 0 760 30 0 44 74 2 616 27 645 2 0 3 5 1484 % App. Total 5.4 94.6 0 40.5 0 59.5 0.3 95.5 4.2 40 0 60 PHF .683 .890 .000 .876 .625 .000 .786 .740 .500 .917 .750 .906 .250 .000 .250 .417 .890 Pacific Avenue
Telacu Senior Court Driveway
Bogart Avenue
Pacific Avenue
Right
0 Thru
719
Left
41 InOut Total
662 760 1422
Right
44 Thru
0 Left
30 OutTotal In
68 74 142
Left
2 Thru
616
Right
27 Out TotalIn
752 645 1397
Left
2 Thru
0 Right
3 TotalOut In
2 5 7
Peak Hour Begins at 03:30 PM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_BogartAve_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Pacific Avenue
Southbound
Bogart Avenue
Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Telacu Senior Court
Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 3 8
07:15 AM 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 5
07:30 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 9
07:45 AM 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 7
Total 0 0 2 15 0 1 1 10 29
08:00 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 8 10
08:15 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 6
08:30 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 5
08:45 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
Total 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 15 23
09:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
09:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5
09:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 6
09:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 5
Total 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 12 18
03:00 PM 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 5
03:15 PM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 9
03:30 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 5
03:45 PM 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 8 15
Total 0 0 2 15 0 0 3 14 34
04:00 PM 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 2 8
04:15 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 5
04:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 3
04:45 PM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 7
Total 0 0 2 10 0 0 2 9 23
05:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2
05:15 PM 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 8 15
05:30 PM 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 0 6
05:45 PM 0 0 1 4 0 1 1 2 9
Total 0 0 5 13 0 1 2 11 32
06:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 4
06:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 7 10
06:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
06:45 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 0 1 4 0 1 1 10 17
Grand Total 0 0 14 65 0 4 12 81 176
Apprch % 0 0 17.7 82.3 0 100 12.9 87.1
Total % 0 0 8 36.9 0 2.3 6.8 46

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_BogartAve_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Pacific Avenue
Southbound
Bogart Avenue
Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Telacu Senior Court
Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 6 6 9
07:45 AM 0 0 0 2 5 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
08:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 8 8 10
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 5 6
Total Volume 0 0 0 3 10 13 0 0 0 0 19 19 32
% App. Total 0 0 23.1 76.9 0 0 0 100
PHF .000 .000 .000 .375 .500 .464 .000 .000 .000 .000 .594 .594 .800 Pacific Avenue
Telacu Senior Court Driveway
Bogart Avenue
Pacific Avenue
Thru
0 Peds
0 InOut Total
0 0 0
Thru
3 Peds
10 OutTotal In
0 13 13
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out TotalIn
0 0 0
Thru
0 Peds
19 TotalOut In
3 19 22
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_BogartAve_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Pacific Avenue
Southbound
Bogart Avenue
Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Telacu Senior Court
Driveway
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.

Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:15 PM
03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 4 4 9
03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 5
03:45 PM 0 0 0 1 5 6 0 0 0 1 8 9 15
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 2 2 8
Total Volume 0 0 0 1 20 21 0 0 0 2 14 16 37
% App. Total 0 0 4.8 95.2 0 0 12.5 87.5
PHF .000 .000 .000 .250 .833 .875 .000 .000 .000 .500 .438 .444 .617 Pacific Avenue
Telacu Senior Court Driveway
Bogart Avenue
Pacific Avenue
Thru
0 Peds
0 InOut Total
0 0 0
Thru
1 Peds
20 OutTotal In
2 21 23
Thru
0 Peds
0 Out TotalIn
0 0 0
Thru
2 Peds
14 TotalOut In
1 16 17
Peak Hour Begins at 03:15 PM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_DowningAve
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Vehicles
Pacific Avenue
Southbound
Downing Avenue
Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Downing Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 1 104 0 11 0 6 2 109 3 0 4 3 243
07:15 AM 4 130 5 7 1 10 1 126 10 4 1 1 300
07:30 AM 8 146 9 10 2 30 0 165 3 5 2 1 381
07:45 AM 5 157 19 7 6 16 0 171 9 13 6 1 410
Total 18 537 33 35 9 62 3 571 25 22 13 6 1334
08:00 AM 12 155 9 13 1 4 5 204 6 8 0 3 420
08:15 AM 5 87 4 6 1 6 3 135 6 6 0 1 260
08:30 AM 6 120 0 8 0 5 1 109 4 1 0 1 255
08:45 AM 3 89 6 7 2 3 3 117 8 6 2 0 246
Total 26 451 19 34 4 18 12 565 24 21 2 5 1181
09:00 AM 3 78 6 9 0 5 1 125 7 3 0 1 238
09:15 AM 3 93 0 5 2 4 2 117 3 3 2 3 237
09:30 AM 8 117 4 6 2 7 2 110 11 3 1 2 273
09:45 AM 4 99 3 9 2 4 0 131 4 1 1 0 258
Total 18 387 13 29 6 20 5 483 25 10 4 6 1006
03:00 PM 11 143 10 14 2 14 3 140 8 4 0 3 352
03:15 PM 11 167 5 7 2 7 0 129 14 2 3 1 348
03:30 PM 21 171 4 10 1 9 12 158 12 3 3 0 404
03:45 PM 16 171 6 15 1 7 2 156 7 1 2 3 387
Total 59 652 25 46 6 37 17 583 41 10 8 7 1491
04:00 PM 11 150 3 16 3 20 0 147 22 2 1 0 375
04:15 PM 14 173 5 10 0 6 2 146 9 3 1 3 372
04:30 PM 10 189 2 11 2 10 2 132 11 3 4 2 378
04:45 PM 8 164 2 7 2 8 1 138 11 1 1 2 345
Total 43 676 12 44 7 44 5 563 53 9 7 7 1470
05:00 PM 15 169 2 11 2 8 3 130 10 2 3 2 357
05:15 PM 13 162 3 14 1 10 2 173 9 6 1 0 394
05:30 PM 14 151 5 18 4 5 1 148 4 5 2 1 358
05:45 PM 13 171 5 4 2 17 1 137 8 4 3 0 365
Total 55 653 15 47 9 40 7 588 31 17 9 3 1474
06:00 PM 12 165 6 13 4 17 0 151 11 4 3 3 389
06:15 PM 14 161 1 10 1 9 3 131 9 1 2 2 344
06:30 PM 10 148 1 11 0 7 2 137 7 4 0 1 328
06:45 PM 14 136 3 6 1 7 0 134 4 2 0 0 307
Total 50 610 11 40 6 40 5 553 31 11 5 6 1368
Grand Total 269 3966 128 275 47 261 54 3906 230 100 48 40 9324 Apprch % 6.2 90.9 2.9 47.2 8.1 44.8 1.3 93.2 5.5 53.2 25.5 21.3 Total % 2.9 42.5 1.4 2.9 0.5 2.8 0.6 41.9 2.5 1.1 0.5 0.4

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_DowningAve
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Pacific Avenue
Southbound
Downing Avenue
Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Downing Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 4 130 5 139 7 1 10 18 1 126 10 137 4 1 1 6 300 07:30 AM 8 146 9 163 10 2 30 42 0 165 3 168 5 2 1 8 381 07:45 AM 5 157 19 181 7 6 16 29 0 171 9 180 13 6 1 20 410 08:00 AM 12 155 9 176 13 1 4 18 5 204 6 215 8 0 3 11 420 Total Volume 29 588 42 659 37 10 60 107 6 666 28 700 30 9 6 45 1511 % App. Total 4.4 89.2 6.4 34.6 9.3 56.1 0.9 95.1 4 66.7 20 13.3 PHF .604 .936 .553 .910 .712 .417 .500 .637 .300 .816 .700 .814 .577 .375 .500 .563 .899 Pacific Avenue
Downing Avenue
Downing Avenue
Pacific Avenue
Right
42 Thru
588
Left
29 InOut Total
756 659 1415
Right
60 Thru
10 Left
37 OutTotal In
66 107 173
Left
6 Thru
666
Right
28 Out TotalIn
631 700 1331
Left
30 Thru
9 Right
6 TotalOut In
58 45 103
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_DowningAve
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Pacific Avenue
Southbound
Downing Avenue
Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Downing Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:30 PM
03:30 PM 21 171 4 196 10 1 9 20 12 158 12 182 3 3 0 6 404 03:45 PM 16 171 6 193 15 1 7 23 2 156 7 165 1 2 3 6 387 04:00 PM 11 150 3 164 16 3 20 39 0 147 22 169 2 1 0 3 375 04:15 PM 14 173 5 192 10 0 6 16 2 146 9 157 3 1 3 7 372 Total Volume 62 665 18 745 51 5 42 98 16 607 50 673 9 7 6 22 1538 % App. Total 8.3 89.3 2.4 52 5.1 42.9 2.4 90.2 7.4 40.9 31.8 27.3 PHF .738 .961 .750 .950 .797 .417 .525 .628 .333 .960 .568 .924 .750 .583 .500 .786 .952 Pacific Avenue
Downing Avenue
Downing Avenue
Pacific Avenue
Right
18 Thru
665
Left
62 InOut Total
658 745 1403
Right
42 Thru
5 Left
51 OutTotal In
119 98 217
Left
16 Thru
607
Right
50 Out TotalIn
722 673 1395
Left
9 Thru
7 Right
6 TotalOut In
39 22 61
Peak Hour Begins at 03:30 PM

Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_DowningAve_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Bikes & Peds
Pacific Avenue
Southbound
Downing Avenue
Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Downing Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Bikes Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
07:15 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
07:30 AM 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 2 11
07:45 AM 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 6
Total 0 8 2 4 0 2 1 3 20
08:00 AM 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 6 10
08:15 AM 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 4 7
08:30 AM 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3
08:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 5
Total 0 3 2 3 0 6 0 11 25
09:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
09:15 AM 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 5 8
09:30 AM 0 1 1 0 0 4 2 1 9
09:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 2 7
Total 0 2 1 2 0 8 3 9 25
03:00 PM 0 4 1 3 0 2 1 1 12
03:15 PM 0 2 0 2 0 5 0 4 13
03:30 PM 0 2 0 4 0 0 1 3 10
03:45 PM 0 1 1 3 0 11 1 5 22
Total 0 9 2 12 0 18 3 13 57
04:00 PM 0 2 0 4 0 9 0 1 16
04:15 PM 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 2 8
04:30 PM 0 0 1 3 0 4 1 5 14
04:45 PM 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 6 12
Total 0 8 2 9 0 15 2 14 50
05:00 PM 0 4 1 2 0 5 0 4 16
05:15 PM 0 1 1 2 0 3 0 10 17
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
05:45 PM 0 3 2 9 0 4 1 0 19
Total 0 8 4 13 0 12 1 15 53
06:00 PM 0 1 0 2 0 6 0 3 12
06:15 PM 0 4 0 4 0 0 1 0 9
06:30 PM 0 8 0 1 0 3 0 1 13
06:45 PM 0 1 1 0 0 6 0 2 10
Total 0 14 1 7 0 15 1 6 44
Grand Total 0 52 14 50 0 76 11 71 274
Apprch % 0 100 21.9 78.1 0 100 13.4 86.6
Total % 0 19 5.1 18.2 0 27.7 4 25.9

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_DowningAve_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 2
Pacific Avenue
Southbound
Downing Avenue
Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Downing Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Bikes Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 5 5 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 11
07:45 AM 0 2 2 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
08:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 6 6 10
08:15 AM 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4 4 7
Total Volume 0 8 8 4 5 9 0 5 5 0 12 12 34
% App. Total 0 100 44.4 55.6 0 100 0 100
PHF .000 .400 .400 .500 .625 .563 .000 .625 .625 .000 .500 .500 .773 Pacific Avenue
Downing Avenue
Downing Avenue
Pacific Avenue
Thru
0 Peds
8 InOut Total
0 8 8
Thru
4 Peds
5 OutTotal In
0 9 9
Thru
0 Peds
5 Out TotalIn
0 5 5
Thru
0 Peds
12 TotalOut In
4 12 16
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
File Name : PacificAve_DowningAve_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/10/2022
Page No : 3
Pacific Avenue
Southbound
Downing Avenue
Westbound
Pacific Avenue
Northbound
Downing Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Bikes Peds App.

Total Bikes Peds App.

Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:15 PM
03:15 PM 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 5 5 0 4 4 13
03:30 PM 0 2 2 0 4 4 0 0 0 1 3 4 10
03:45 PM 0 1 1 1 3 4 0 11 11 1 5 6 22
04:00 PM 0 2 2 0 4 4 0 9 9 0 1 1 16
Total Volume 0 7 7 1 13 14 0 25 25 2 13 15 61
% App. Total 0 100 7.1 92.9 0 100 13.3 86.7
PHF .000 .875 .875 .250 .813 .875 .000 .568 .568 .500 .650 .625 .693 Pacific Avenue
Downing Avenue
Downing Avenue
Pacific Avenue
Thru
0 Peds
7 InOut Total
0 7 7
Thru
1 Peds
13 OutTotal In
2 14 16
Thru
0 Peds
25 Out TotalIn
0 25 25
Thru
2 Peds
13 TotalOut In
1 15 16
Peak Hour Begins at 03:15 PM

Bikes & Peds
Peak Hour Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-22-4468-1 Zocalo Park Project

APPENDIX B

INTERSECTION OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS

HCM AND LEVELS OF SERVICE EXPLANATION

HCM DATA WORKSHEETS – WEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR

LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

In the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), published by the Transportation Research Board, 2000, level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and increased travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is made up of a number of factors that relate to control, geometrics, traffic, and incidents. Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that would result during base conditions: in the absence of traffic control, in the absence of geometric delay, in the absence of incidents, and when there are no other vehicles on the road. Only the portion of total delay attributed to the control facility is quantified. This delay is called control delay. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay.

Level of Service criteria for traffic signals are stated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle. Delay is a complex measure and is dependent on a number of variables, including the quality of progression, the cycle length, the green ratio, and the v/c ratio for the lane group in question.

Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections
Level of Service Control Delay (Sec/Veh)
A ≤ 10
B > 10 and ≤ 20
C > 20 and ≤ 35
D > 35 and ≤ 55
E > 55 and ≤ 80
F > 80

Level of Service (LOS) values are used to describe intersection operations with service levels varying from LOS A (free flow) to LOS F (jammed condition). The following descriptions summarize HCM criteria for each level of service:

LOS A describes operations with very low control delay, up to 10 seconds per vehicle. This level of service occurs when progression is extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay values.

LOS B describes operations with control delay greater than 10 and up to 20 seconds per vehicle. This level generally occurs with good progression, short cycle lengths, or both. More vehicles stop than with LOS A, causing higher levels of delay.

LOS C describes operations with control delay greater than 20 and up to 35 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression, longer cycle lengths, or both. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping.

LOS D describes operations with control delay greater than 35 and up to 55 seconds per vehicle. At LOS D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high v/c ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable.

LOS E describes operations with control delay greater than 55 and up to 80 seconds per vehicle. This level is considered by many agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences.

LOS F describes operations with control delay in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle. This level, considered to be unacceptable to most drivers, often occurs with oversaturation, that is, when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the lane groups. It may also occur at high v/c ratios with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing factors to such delay levels.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 1: Baldwin Park Blvd & Sterling Way Weekday AM Peak Hour Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 146 0 137 0 526 85 67 496 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 146 0 137 0 526 85 67 496 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 159 0 149 0 572 92 73 539 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 202222220
Cap, veh/h 231 0 205 96 2281 366 624 2644 0
Arrive On Green 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 0 1585 866 3067 492 772 3647 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 159 0 149 0 331 333 73 539 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1585 866 1777 1782 772 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 0.0 6.8 0.0 4.4 4.4 2.5 3.4 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 0.0 6.8 0.0 4.4 4.4 6.9 3.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 231 0 205 96 1322 1325 624 2644 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.12 0.20 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 841 0 748 96 1322 1325 624 2644 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.2 0.0 31.4 0.0 3.0 3.0 4.1 2.9 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.7 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 5.2 0.0 5.0 0.0 2.1 2.1 0.7 1.5 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.9 0.0 36.2 0.0 3.5 3.5 4.5 3.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS C ADAAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 308 664 612
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.5 3.5 3.2
Approach LOS D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 61.3 13.7 61.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 4.0 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.1 35.4 30.1
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 8.8 8.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.1 1.0 5.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.6
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 1: Baldwin Park Blvd & Sterling Way Weekday PM Peak Hour Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 85 0 106 0 518 52 84 472 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 85 0 106 0 518 52 84 472 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 92 0 115 0 563 57 91 513 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 202222220
Cap, veh/h 185 0 164 96 2508 253 676 2735 0
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 0 1585 887 3259 329 804 3647 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 92 0 115 0 306 314 91 513 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1585 887 1777 1811 804 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.7 0.0 5.3 0.0 3.6 3.6 2.7 2.9 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.7 0.0 5.3 0.0 3.6 3.6 6.3 2.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 185 0 164 96 1368 1394 676 2735 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.13 0.19 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 841 0 748 96 1368 1394 676 2735 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.8 0.0 32.5 0.0 2.4 2.4 3.3 2.3 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.1 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 2.9 0.0 4.0 0.0 1.5 1.6 0.7 1.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 33.8 0.0 37.8 0.0 2.8 2.8 3.7 2.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS C ADAAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 207 620 604
Approach Delay, s/veh 36.0 2.8 2.7
Approach LOS D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 63.2 11.8 63.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 4.0 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.1 35.4 30.1
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.6 7.3 8.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.7 0.6 5.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.5
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future With Project Cond itions 1: Baldwin Park Blvd & Sterling Way Weekday AM Peak Hour Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 176 0 173 0 556 56 37 526 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 176 0 173 0 556 56 37 526 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 191 0 188 0 604 61 40 572 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 202222220
Cap, veh/h 278 0 247 96 2338 236 599 2549 0
Arrive On Green 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 0 1585 840 3259 329 771 3647 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 191 0 188 0 329 336 40 572 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1585 840 1777 1811 771 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.6 0.0 8.5 0.0 4.8 4.8 1.4 4.1 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.6 0.0 8.5 0.0 4.8 4.8 6.3 4.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 278 0 247 96 1275 1299 599 2549 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.22 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 841 0 748 96 1275 1299 599 2549 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.9 0.0 30.3 0.0 3.7 3.7 4.8 3.6 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.0 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 6.1 0.0 6.2 0.0 2.5 2.5 0.4 2.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.9 0.0 35.1 0.0 4.2 4.2 5.0 3.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS C ADAAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 379 665 612
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.0 4.2 3.9
Approach LOS C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 59.3 15.7 59.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 4.0 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.1 35.4 30.1
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.8 10.5 8.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.0 1.2 5.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.9
HCM 6th LOS B
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future With Project Cond itions 1: Baldwin Park Blvd & Sterling Way Weekday PM Peak Hour Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 110 0 133 0 538 34 64 492 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 110 0 133 0 538 34 64 492 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 120 0 145 0 585 37 70 535 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 202222220
Cap, veh/h 223 0 198 96 2540 160 654 2659 0
Arrive On Green 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 0 1585 870 3394 214 802 3647 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 120 0 145 0 306 316 70 535 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1585 870 1777 1832 802 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.7 0.0 6.6 0.0 3.9 3.9 2.2 3.3 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.7 0.0 6.6 0.0 3.9 3.9 6.1 3.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 223 0 198 96 1329 1371 654 2659 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.11 0.20 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 841 0 748 96 1329 1371 654 2659 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.8 0.0 31.6 0.0 2.9 2.9 3.8 2.8 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 3.8 0.0 4.9 0.0 1.8 1.9 0.6 1.5 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.8 0.0 36.7 0.0 3.3 3.3 4.1 3.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C ADAAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 265 622 605
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.9 3.3 3.1
Approach LOS C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 61.6 13.4 61.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 4.0 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.1 35.4 30.1
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.9 8.6 8.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.6 0.8 5.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.8
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
2: Sterling Way North & Ramona Blvd Weekday AM Peak Hour Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 645 20 43 884 13 35
Future Vol, veh/h 645 20 43 884 13 35
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 0 - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 701 22 47 961 14 38

Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 723 0 1287 362
Stage 1 - - - - 712 -
Stage 2 - - - - 575 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 875 - 156 635
Stage 1 - - - - 447 -
Stage 2 - - - - 526 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 875 - 148 635
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 148 -
Stage 1 - - - - 447 -
Stage 2 - - - - 498 -

Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 16.7

HCM LOS C

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 148 635 - - 875 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.095 0.06 - - 0.053 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 31.9 11 - - 9.3 -
HCM Lane LOS D B - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.2 - - 0.2 -
HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
2: Sterling Way North & Ramona Blvd Weekday PM Peak Hour Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1020 26 45 709 4 40
Future Vol, veh/h 1020 26 45 709 4 40
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 0 - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 1109 28 49 771 4 43

Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1137 0 1607 569
Stage 1 - - - - 1123 -
Stage 2 - - - - 484 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 610 - 96 465
Stage 1 - - - - 273 -
Stage 2 - - - - 585 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 610 - 88 465
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 88 -
Stage 1 - - - - 273 -
Stage 2 - - - - 538 -

Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.7 16.6

HCM LOS C

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 88 465 - - 610 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 0.094 - - 0.08 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 48 13.5 - - 11.4 -
HCM Lane LOS E B - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 - - 0.3 -
HCM 6th TWSC Future With Project Conditions
2: Sterling Way North & Ramona Blvd Weekday AM Peak Hour Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 825 21 108 894 13 36
Future Vol, veh/h 825 21 108 894 13 36
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 0 - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 897 23 117 972 14 39

Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 920 0 1629 460
Stage 1 - - - - 909 -
Stage 2 - - - - 720 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 738 - 93 548
Stage 1 - - - - 353 -
Stage 2 - - - - 443 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 738 - 78 548
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 78 -
Stage 1 - - - - 353 -
Stage 2 - - - - 373 -

Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.2 25.1

HCM LOS D

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 78 548 - - 738 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.181 0.071 - - 0.159 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 61.1 12.1 - - 10.8 -
HCM Lane LOS F B - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0.2 - - 0.6 -
HCM 6th TWSC Future With Project Conditions
2: Sterling Way North & Ramona Blvd Weekday PM Peak Hour Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1200 28 95 720 4 44
Future Vol, veh/h 1200 28 95 720 4 44
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 0 - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 1304 30 103 783 4 48

Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1334 0 1917 667
Stage 1 - - - - 1319 -
Stage 2 - - - - 598 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 513 - 59 401
Stage 1 - - - - 214 -
Stage 2 - - - - 512 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 513 - 47 401
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 47 -
Stage 1 - - - - 214 -
Stage 2 - - - - 409 -

Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.6 21.4

HCM LOS C

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 47 401 - - 513 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.093 0.119 - - 0.201 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 89.3 15.2 - - 13.8 -
HCM Lane LOS F C - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.4 - - 0.7 -
HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
3: Sterling Way & Sterling Way North Weekday AM Peak Hour Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 120 205 37 38 37
Future Vol, veh/h 14 120 205 37 38 37
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 15 130 223 40 41 40

Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 263 0 - 0 403 243
Stage 1 - - - - 243 -
Stage 2 - - - - 160 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1301 - - - 603 796
Stage 1 - - - - 797 -
Stage 2 - - - - 869 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1301 - - - 596 796
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 596 -
Stage 1 - - - - 787 -
Stage 2 - - - - 869 -

Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.8 0 10.7

HCM LOS B

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) 1301 - - - 596 796
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - - 0.069 0.051
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - - 11.5 9.8
HCM Lane LOS A A - - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2 0.2
HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
3: Sterling Way & Sterling Way North Weekday PM Peak Hour Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 141 124 40 55 20
Future Vol, veh/h 24 141 124 40 55 20
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 26 153 135 43 60 22

Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 178 0 - 0 362 157
Stage 1 - - - - 157 -
Stage 2 - - - - 205 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1398 - - - 637 889
Stage 1 - - - - 871 -
Stage 2 - - - - 829 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1398 - - - 624 889
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 624 -
Stage 1 - - - - 854 -
Stage 2 - - - - 829 -

Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0 10.8

HCM LOS B

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) 1398 - - - 624 889
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 - - - 0.096 0.024
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 - - 11.4 9.2
HCM Lane LOS A A - - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 0.1
HCM 6th TWSC Future With Project Conditions
3: Sterling Way & Sterling Way North Weekday AM Peak Hour Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.7
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 40 66 38 39 102
Future Vol, veh/h 14 40 66 38 39 102
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 15 43 72 41 42 111

Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 113 0 - 0 166 93
Stage 1 - - - - 93 -
Stage 2 - - - - 73 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1476 - - - 824 964
Stage 1 - - - - 931 -
Stage 2 - - - - 950 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1476 - - - 816 964
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 816 -
Stage 1 - - - - 922 -
Stage 2 - - - - 950 -

Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.9 0 9.3

HCM LOS A

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) 1476 - - - 816 964
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - - 0.052 0.115
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 9.7 9.2
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2 0.4
HCM 6th TWSC Future With Project Conditions
3: Sterling Way & Sterling Way North Weekday PM Peak Hour Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.5
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 51 56 44 57 70
Future Vol, veh/h 24 51 56 44 57 70
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 26 55 61 48 62 76

Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 109 0 - 0 192 85
Stage 1 - - - - 85 -
Stage 2 - - - - 107 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1481 - - - 797 974
Stage 1 - - - - 938 -
Stage 2 - - - - 917 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1481 - - - 783 974
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 783 -
Stage 1 - - - - 921 -
Stage 2 - - - - 917 -

Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.4 0 9.4

HCM LOS A

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) 1481 - - - 783 974
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - - 0.079 0.078
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 10 9
HCM Lane LOS A A - - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 0.3
HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
4: Maine Ave & Sterling Way Weekday AM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 46 146 10 11 162 190 5 7 6 124 10 21 Future Vol, veh/h 46 146 10 11 162 190 5 7 6 124 10 21
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 50 159 11 12 176 207 5 8 7 135 11 23

Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 383 0 0 170 0 0 586 672 165 576 574 280 Stage 1 - ----- 2 6 5 2 6 5- 3 0 4 3 0 4-
Stage 2 - ----- 3 2 1 4 0 7- 2 7 2 2 7 0-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1175 - - 1407 - - 422 377 879 428 429 759 Stage 1 - ----- 7 4 0 6 8 9- 7 0 5 6 6 3-
Stage 2 - ----- 6 9 1 5 9 7- 7 3 4 6 8 6-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1175 - - 1407 - - 384 356 879 400 405 759 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 3 8 4 3 5 6- 4 0 0 4 0 5-
Stage 1 - ----- 7 0 5 6 5 7- 6 7 2 6 5 6-
Stage 2 - ----- 6 5 2 5 9 0- 6 8 6 6 5 4-

Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.9 0.2 13.2 18.8

HCM LOS B C

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 456 1175 - - 1407 - - 428
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.043 0.043 - - 0.008 - - 0.394
HCM Control Delay (s) 13.2 8.2 0 - 7.6 0 - 18.8
HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 - - 0 - - 1.8
HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
4: Maine Ave & Sterling Way Weekday PM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 131 3 2 140 130 2 10 1 149 7 36
Future Vol, veh/h 29 131 3 2 140 130 2 10 1 149 7 36
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 32 142 3 2 152 141 2 11 1 162 8 39

Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 293 0 0 145 0 0 458 505 144 441 436 223 Stage 1 - ----- 2 0 8 2 0 8- 2 2 7 2 2 7-
Stage 2 - ----- 2 5 0 2 9 7- 2 1 4 2 0 9-
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1269 - - 1437 - - 513 470 903 527 514 817 Stage 1 - ----- 7 9 4 7 3 0- 7 7 6 7 1 6-
Stage 2 - ----- 7 5 4 6 6 8- 7 8 8 7 2 9-
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1269 - - 1437 - - 472 456 903 505 499 817 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - ----- 4 7 2 4 5 6- 5 0 5 4 9 9-
Stage 1 - ----- 7 7 3 7 1 0- 7 5 5 7 1 5-
Stage 2 - ----- 7 0 9 6 6 7- 7 5 4 7 0 9-

Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.4 0.1 12.8 15.7

HCM LOS B C

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 477 1269 - - 1437 - - 544
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.03 0.025 - - 0.002 - - 0.384
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.8 7.9 0 - 7.5 0 - 15.7
HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 - - 0 - - 1.8
HCM 6th AWSC Future With Project Conditions
4: Maine Ave & Sterling Way Weekday AM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.2
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 47 15 5 13 16 62
Future Vol, veh/h 47 15 5 13 16 62
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles, % 222222
Mvmt Flow 51 16 5 14 17 67
Number of Lanes 100110
Approach EB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 0
Conflicting Approach Right NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1
HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.3 7

HCM LOS A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 28% 76% 0%
Vol Thru, % 72% 0% 21%
Vol Right, % 0% 24% 79%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 18 62 78
LT Vol 5 47 0
Through Vol 13 0 16
RT Vol 0 15 62
Lane Flow Rate 20 67 85
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.023 0.077 0.085
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.172 4.119 3.589
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 854 869 994
Service Time 2.215 2.15 1.628
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 0.077 0.086
HCM Control Delay 7.3 7.5 7
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.2 0.3
HCM 6th AWSC Future With Project Conditions
4: Maine Ave & Sterling Way Weekday PM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 31 4 2 11 8 70
Future Vol, veh/h 31 4 2 11 8 70
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles, % 222222
Mvmt Flow 34 4 2 12 9 76
Number of Lanes 100110
Approach EB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 0
Conflicting Approach Right NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1
HCM Control Delay 7.4 7.2 6.8

HCM LOS A A A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 15% 89% 0%
Vol Thru, % 85% 0% 10%
Vol Right, % 0% 11% 90%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 13 35 78
LT Vol 2 31 0
Through Vol 11 0 8
RT Vol 0 4 70
Lane Flow Rate 14 38 85
Geometry Grp 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.016 0.045 0.082
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.095 4.214 3.473
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes
Cap 873 851 1031
Service Time 2.123 2.233 1.497
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 0.045 0.082
HCM Control Delay 7.2 7.4 6.8
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0.1 0.3
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 5: Ramona Blvd & Cesar Chavez Weekday AM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 31 632 908 12 7 17
Future Volume (veh/h) 31 632 908 12 7 17
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 34 687 987 13 8 18
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 84 2873 2542 33 25 57
Arrive On Green 0.05 0.81 0.71 0.71 0.05 0.05
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 3685 47 488 1099
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 34 687 488 512 27 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1777 1862 1648 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 3.4 8.3 8.3 1.2 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 3.4 8.3 8.3 1.2 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.03 0.30 0.67
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 84 2873 1257 1318 85 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.40 0.24 0.39 0.39 0.32 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 166 2873 1257 1318 725 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.59 0.59 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.7 1.7 4.4 4.4 34.3 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 2.1 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.1 0.8 4.0 4.1 0.9 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.8 1.9 5.0 4.9 36.4 0.0
LnGrp LOS DAAADA
Approach Vol, veh/h 721 1000 27
Approach Delay, s/veh 3.5 4.9 36.4
Approach LOS A A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 66.1 8.9 7.6 58.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 33.0 7.0 20.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.4 3.2 3.4 10.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.8 0.0 0.0 5.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 4.8
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 5: Ramona Blvd & Cesar Chavez Weekday PM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 48 939 699 8 24 59
Future Volume (veh/h) 48 939 699 8 24 59
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 52 1021 760 9 26 64
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 110 2694 2313 27 48 118
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.76 0.64 0.64 0.10 0.10
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 3690 43 468 1153
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 52 1021 375 394 91 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1777 1863 1639 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 7.3 7.2 7.2 4.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 7.3 7.2 7.2 4.0 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.02 0.29 0.70
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 110 2694 1142 1198 167 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.47 0.38 0.33 0.33 0.54 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 166 2694 1142 1198 721 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.78 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.0 3.1 6.1 6.1 32.0 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 0.4 0.6 0.6 2.7 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.6 2.8 4.0 4.2 3.0 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.2 3.5 6.7 6.6 34.8 0.0
LnGrp LOS DAAACA
Approach Vol, veh/h 1073 769 91
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.0 6.6 34.8
Approach LOS A A C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 62.4 12.6 8.6 53.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 33.0 7.0 20.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.3 6.0 4.1 9.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 10.1 0.2 0.0 4.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.1
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future With Project Cond itions 5: Ramona Blvd & Cesar Chavez Weekday AM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 31 813 983 12 7 17
Future Volume (veh/h) 31 813 983 12 7 17
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 34 884 1068 13 8 18
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222
Cap, veh/h 84 2873 2544 31 25 57
Arrive On Green 0.05 0.81 0.71 0.71 0.05 0.05
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 3689 44 488 1099
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 34 884 528 553 27 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1777 1862 1648 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 4.8 9.3 9.3 1.2 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 4.8 9.3 9.3 1.2 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.02 0.30 0.67
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 84 2873 1257 1318 85 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.40 0.31 0.42 0.42 0.32 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 166 2873 1257 1318 725 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.51 0.51 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.7 1.8 4.6 4.6 34.3 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 2.1 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.1 1.1 4.3 4.4 0.9 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.8 2.1 5.1 5.1 36.4 0.0
LnGrp LOS D AAADA
Approach Vol, veh/h 918 1081 27
Approach Delay, s/veh 3.4 5.1 36.4
Approach LOS A A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 66.1 8.9 7.6 58.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 33.0 7.0 20.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.8 3.2 3.4 11.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 9.0 0.0 0.0 5.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 4.7
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future With Project Cond itions 5: Ramona Blvd & Cesar Chavez Weekday PM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 48 1123 760 8 24 59
Future Volume (veh/h) 48 1123 760 8 24 59
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 52 1221 826 9 26 64
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222
Cap, veh/h 110 2694 2315 25 48 118
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.76 0.64 0.64 0.10 0.10
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 3694 39 468 1153
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 52 1221 408 427 91 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1777 1863 1639 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 9.5 8.0 8.0 4.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 9.5 8.0 8.0 4.0 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.02 0.29 0.70
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 110 2694 1142 1198 167 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.47 0.45 0.36 0.36 0.54 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 166 2694 1142 1198 721 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.70 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.0 3.3 6.2 6.2 32.0 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.7 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.6 3.6 4.5 4.7 3.0 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.2 3.9 6.8 6.8 34.8 0.0
LnGrp LOS D A A A C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1273 835 91
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.2 6.8 34.8
Approach LOS A A C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 62.4 12.6 8.6 53.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 5.0 4.0 5.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 33.0 7.0 20.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.5 6.0 4.1 10.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 11.5 0.2 0.0 4.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.0
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 6: Maine Ave & Ramona Blvd Weekday AM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 104 416 117 67 735 63 88 375 41 50 316 53 Future Volume (veh/h) 104 416 117 67 735 63 88 375 41 50 316 53 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 0 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1 870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 113 452 127 73 799 68 96 408 45 54 343 58 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9 2 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 145 978 273 135 1164 99 142 619 525 124 500 85 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.36 0.36 0.08 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2744 765 1781 3314 282 1781 1870 1585 1781 1559 264 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 113 291 288 73 428 439 96 408 45 54 0 401 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1733 1781 1777 1820 1781 1870 1585 178 1 0 1823 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.5 15.1 15.4 4.7 24.7 24.7 6.3 22.4 2.3 3.5 0.0 23.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.5 15.1 15.4 4.7 24.7 24.7 6.3 22.4 2.3 3.5 0.0 23.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.14
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 145 634 618 135 624 639 142 619 525 124 0 585 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.46 0.47 0.54 0.69 0.69 0.67 0.66 0.09 0.44 0.00 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 171 634 618 171 624 639 171 619 525 171 0 585 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 .00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.1 29.7 29.8 53.4 33.3 33.3 53.7 34.3 27.6 53. 6 0.0 35.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 14.3 2.4 2.5 1.2 6.1 5.9 4.9 5.4 0.3 0.9 0.0 6.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 7.0 11.1 11.0 3.9 17.1 17.4 5.4 16.5 1.7 2.9 0.0 1 6.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 68.4 32.1 32.3 54.6 39.3 39.2 58.6 39.7 27.9 54.5 0.0 41.9 LnGrp LOS E C C D D D E D C D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 692 940 549 455
Approach Delay, s/veh 38.1 40.5 42.1 43.4
Approach LOS DDDD
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.3 47.6 14.1 44.0 13.6 48.3 12.8 45.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s11.5 38.5 11.5 38.5 11.5 38.5 11.5 38.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.5 26.7 8.3 25.0 6.7 17.4 5.5 24.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.5 0.0 2.9 0.0 4.8 0.0 3.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 40.7
HCM 6th LOS D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 6: Maine Ave & Ramona Blvd Weekday PM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 166 723 160 121 515 64 107 328 100 61 346 70 Future Volume (veh/h) 166 723 160 121 515 64 107 328 100 61 346 70 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 0 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1 870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 180 786 174 132 560 70 116 357 109 66 376 76 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9 2 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 171 990 219 158 1065 133 145 614 520 132 485 98 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.34 0.34 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.08 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2892 640 1781 3179 396 1781 1870 1585 1781 1510 305 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 180 483 477 132 312 318 116 357 109 66 0 452 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1755 1781 1777 1799 1781 1870 1585 178 1 0 1815 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.5 29.5 29.5 8.8 17.0 17.1 7.7 19.0 6.0 4.3 0.0 27.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.5 29.5 29.5 8.8 17.0 17.1 7.7 19.0 6.0 4.3 0.0 27. 0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.17
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 171 608 601 158 595 603 145 614 520 132 0 582 V/C Ratio(X) 1.05 0.79 0.79 0.84 0.52 0.53 0.80 0.58 0.21 0.50 0.00 0.78 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 171 608 601 171 595 603 171 614 520 171 0 582 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 .00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.3 35.6 35.6 53.8 32.2 32.2 54.1 33.5 29.1 53. 4 0.0 36.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 81.9 9.7 9.8 25.3 3.3 3.3 16.9 4.0 0.9 1.1 0.0 9.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 14.0 20.1 19.9 8.7 12.3 12.5 7.4 14.3 4.3 3.6 0.0 19.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 136.2 45.3 45.5 79.2 35.5 35.5 71.1 37.4 30.0 54.5 0. 0 46.6 LnGrp LOS F D D E D D E D C D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1140 762 582 518
Approach Delay, s/veh 59.7 43.0 42.7 47.6
Approach LOS E D D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 45.7 14.3 44.0 15.1 46.6 13.4 44.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s11.5 38.5 11.5 38.5 11.5 38.5 11.5 38.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s13.5 19.1 9.7 29.0 10.8 31.5 6.3 21.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.1 0.0 2.7 0.0 4.1 0.0 3.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 50.1
HCM 6th LOS D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future With Project Cond itions 6: Maine Ave & Ramona Blvd Weekday AM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 105 417 297 52 735 63 163 355 21 50 252 53 Future Volume (veh/h) 105 417 297 52 735 63 163 355 21 50 252 53 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 0 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1 870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 114 453 323 57 799 68 177 386 23 54 274 58 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9 2 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 145 716 508 126 1160 99 204 621 527 124 430 91 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.36 0.36 0.07 0.35 0.35 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1985 1408 1781 3314 282 1781 1870 1585 1781 1497 317 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 114 405 371 57 428 439 177 386 23 54 0 332 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1617 1781 1777 1820 1781 1870 1585 178 1 0 1813 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.5 22.7 22.8 3.7 24.8 24.8 11.7 20.8 1.2 3.5 0.0 19.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.5 22.7 22.8 3.7 24.8 24.8 11.7 20.8 1.2 3.5 0.0 19. 2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.17
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 145 641 583 126 622 637 204 621 527 124 0 521 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.63 0.64 0.45 0.69 0.69 0.87 0.62 0.04 0.44 0.00 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 230 641 583 230 622 637 230 621 527 230 0 521 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 .00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.1 31.8 31.8 53.5 33.4 33.4 52.3 33.7 27.1 53. 6 0.0 37.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.4 4.6 5.1 0.9 6.1 6.0 24.0 4.6 0.2 0.9 0.0 5.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 6.3 15.6 14.6 3.0 17.1 17.4 10.8 15.5 0.9 2.9 0.0 14.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 57.5 36.3 36.9 54.4 39.5 39.4 76.3 38.3 27.3 54.5 0.0 43.1 LnGrp LOS E DDDDDEDCDAD
Approach Vol, veh/h 890 924 586 386
Approach Delay, s/veh 39.3 40.4 49.4 44.7
Approach LOS DDDD
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.3 47.5 18.2 40.0 13.0 48.8 12.8 45.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s15.5 34.5 15.5 34.5 15.5 34.5 15.5 34.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.5 26.8 13.7 21.2 5.7 24.8 5.5 22.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 4.4 0.0 2.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 42.5
HCM 6th LOS D
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future With Project Cond itions 6: Maine Ave & Ramona Blvd Weekday PM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 168 725 340 92 515 64 168 308 80 61 278 70 Future Volume (veh/h) 168 725 340 92 515 64 168 308 80 61 278 70 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 0 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1 870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 183 788 370 100 560 70 183 335 87 66 302 76 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9 2 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 210 817 383 143 987 123 210 619 525 132 415 104 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.12 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2349 1100 1781 3179 396 1781 1870 1585 1781 1442 363 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 183 595 563 100 312 318 183 335 87 66 0 378 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1672 1781 1777 1799 1781 1870 1585 178 1 0 1805 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.1 39.4 39.7 6.6 17.6 17.7 12.1 17.5 4.7 4.3 0.0 22.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.1 39.4 39.7 6.6 17.6 17.7 12.1 17.5 4.7 4.3 0.0 22 .6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.66 1.00 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 210 618 582 143 552 559 210 619 525 132 0 519 V/C Ratio(X) 0.87 0.96 0.97 0.70 0.57 0.57 0.87 0.54 0.17 0.50 0.00 0.73 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 230 618 582 230 552 559 230 619 525 230 0 519 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 .00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 52.1 38.4 38.5 53.8 34.6 34.6 52.1 32.7 28.4 53. 4 0.0 38.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 23.5 26.5 28.2 2.3 4.2 4.2 25.5 3.4 0.7 1.1 0.0 8.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 10.8 28.4 27.4 5.4 12.9 13.0 11.2 13.3 3.4 3.6 0. 0 16.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 75.6 64.8 66.6 56.1 38.8 38.8 77.6 36.1 29.1 54.5 0.0 47.2 LnGrp LOS E E E E D D E D C D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1341 730 605 444
Approach Delay, s/veh 67.1 41.1 47.6 48.3
Approach LOS E D D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.6 42.8 18.6 40.0 14.1 47.2 13.4 45.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s15.5 34.5 15.5 34.5 15.5 34.5 15.5 34.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s14.1 19.7 14.1 24.6 8.6 41.7 6.3 19.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.5 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 54.6
HCM 6th LOS D
HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
7: Maine Ave & Alleyway/PD Dwy Weekday AM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 005000 4 9 810 5 2 58
Future Vol, veh/h 0 005000 4 9 810 5 2 58
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 005000 5 4 110 5 7 19

Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1118 1122 271 580 0 0 - - 0
Stage 1 542 542 -------
Stage 2 576 580 -------
Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.53 6.93 4.13 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 5.53 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 5.53 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.219 -----
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 215 205 728 992 - - 0 - -
Stage 1 548 519 ---- 0--
Stage 2 561 499 ---- 0--
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 215 0 728 992 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 215 0 -------
Stage 1 548 0 -------
Stage 2 561 0 -------

Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 22.2 0 0

HCM LOS C

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBRWBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 992 - - 215 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.025 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 22.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 - -
HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
7: Maine Ave & Alleyway/PD Dwy Weekday PM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 000010 5 4 500 6 5 84
Future Vol, veh/h 0 000010 5 4 500 6 5 84
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 000010 5 9 200 7 1 54

Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1309 1311 296 719 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 592 592 -------
Stage 2 717 719 -------
Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.53 6.93 4.13 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 5.53 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 5.53 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.219 -----
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 163 158 701 880 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 517 493 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 483 432 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 163 0 701 880 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 163 0 -------
Stage 1 517 0 -------
Stage 2 483 0 -------

Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10.1 0 0

HCM LOS B

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 880 - 701 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 10.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - -
HCM 6th TWSC Future With Project Conditions
7: Maine Ave & Alleyway/PD Dwy Weekday AM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 00500 1 0 5 3 310 6 2 4 1 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 00500 1 0 5 3 310 6 2 4 1 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-----
Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 00500 1 1 5 7 910 6 7 8 1 1

Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1286 1291 580 689 0 0 - - 0
Stage 1 602 602 -------
Stage 2 684 689 -------
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 4.12 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 5.52 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 -----
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 181 163 514 905 - - 0 - -
Stage 1 547 489 ---- 0--
Stage 2 501 446 ---- 0--
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 179 0 514 905 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 179 0 -------
Stage 1 540 0 -------
Stage 2 501 0 -------

Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 25.7 0.2 0

HCM LOS D

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBRWBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 905 - - 179 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - 0.03 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 9 - - 25.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - D - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 - -
HCM 6th TWSC Future With Project Conditions
7: Maine Ave & Alleyway/PD Dwy Weekday PM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 00001 1 0 5 6 600 7 3 78
Future Vol, veh/h 0 00001 1 0 5 6 600 7 3 78
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - ----- 0-----
Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 0 00001 1 1 6 1 500 8 0 19

Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1443 1447 615 810 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 637 637 -------
Stage 2 806 810 -------
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 4.12 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 5.52 -------
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 -------
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 -----
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 146 131 491 816 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 527 471 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 439 393 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 144 0 491 816 -----
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 144 0 -------
Stage 1 520 0 -------
Stage 2 439 0 -------

Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12.3 0.2 0

HCM LOS B

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTWBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 816 - 491 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.5 - 12.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - -
HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
8: Pacific Ave & Maine Ave Weekday AM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 245 285 449 430 81
Future Vol, veh/h 38 245 285 449 430 81
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 150 - 60 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 41 266 310 488 467 88

Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1375 278 555 0 - 0
Stage 1 511 -----
Stage 2 864 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 136 719 1011 - - -
Stage 1 567 -----
Stage 2 373 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 94 719 1011 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 94 -----
Stage 1 393 -----
Stage 2 373 -----

Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 20.6 3.9 0

HCM LOS C

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1011 - 94 719 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.306 - 0.439 0.37 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 - 70.4 12.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 - 1.8 1.7 - -
HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
8: Pacific Ave & Maine Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 57 237 171 481 545 101
Future Vol, veh/h 57 237 171 481 545 101
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 150 - 60 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 62 258 186 523 592 110

Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1281 351 702 0 - 0
Stage 1 647 -----
Stage 2 634 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 157 645 891 - - -
Stage 1 483 -----
Stage 2 491 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 124 645 891 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 124 -----
Stage 1 382 -----
Stage 2 491 -----

Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 23.1 2.6 0

HCM LOS C

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 891 - 124 645 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.209 - 0.5 0.399 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 - 60 14.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - 2.3 1.9 - -
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future With Project Cond itions 8: Pacific Ave & Maine Ave Weekday AM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 532 610 0
Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 532 610 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 0 1870 1870 0
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 578 663 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 020220
Cap, veh/h 0 0 0 1758 1758 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.94 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 0 0 1870 1870 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0.0 0 578 663 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 2.0 2.5 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 2.0 2.5 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1758 1758 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.33 0.38 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1758 1758 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.0
LnGrp LOS AAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 578 663
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.7 0.8
Approach LOS A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 75.0 75.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 45.5 45.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.0 4.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.4 5.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 0.8
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future With Project Cond itions 8: Pacific Ave & Maine Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 569 725 0
Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 569 725 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 0 1870 1870 0
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 618 788 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 020220
Cap, veh/h 0 0 0 1758 1758 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.94 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 0 0 1870 1870 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0.0 0 618 788 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 2.2 3.3 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 2.2 3.3 0.0
Prop In Lane 0.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1758 1758 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.35 0.45 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1758 1758 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.6 0.8 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.8 1.1 0.0
LnGrp LOS AAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 618 788
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.8 1.1
Approach LOS A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 75.0 75.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 45.5 45.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 5.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.9 7.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 0.9
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
9: Pacific Ave & Bogart Ave Weekday AM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 22 709 31 35 651
Future Vol, veh/h 16 22 709 31 35 651
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 100 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 17 24 771 34 38 708

Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1218 403 0 0 805 0
Stage 1 788 -----
Stage 2 430 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 173 597 - - 815 -
Stage 1 409 -----
Stage 2 624 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 165 597 - - 815 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 165 -----
Stage 1 409 -----
Stage 2 595 -----

Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 19.8 0 0.5

HCM LOS C

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 284 815 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.145 0.047 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 19.8 9.6 -
HCM Lane LOS - - C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.5 0.1 -
HCM 6th TWSC Existing Conditions
9: Pacific Ave & Bogart Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 44 616 27 41 719
Future Vol, veh/h 30 44 616 27 41 719
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - 100 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222
Mvmt Flow 33 48 670 29 45 782

Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1166 350 0 0 699 0
Stage 1 685 -----
Stage 2 481 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 187 646 - - 893 -
Stage 1 462 -----
Stage 2 588 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 178 646 - - 893 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 178 -----
Stage 1 462 -----
Stage 2 559 -----

Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 20.4 0 0.5

HCM LOS C

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 313 893 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.257 0.05 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 20.4 9.2 -
HCM Lane LOS - - C A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1 0.2 -
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future With Project Cond itions 9: Pacific Ave & Bogart Ave Weekday AM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 16 22 509 51 35 586
Future Volume (veh/h) 16 22 509 51 35 586
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 17 24 553 55 38 637
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222
Cap, veh/h 26 37 2544 252 732 3036
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.04 0.78 0.78 0.02 0.85
Sat Flow, veh/h 674 952 3358 324 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 42 0 300 308 38 637
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1665 0 1777 1812 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 0.0 3.4 3.4 0.3 2.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 3.4 3.4 0.3 2.4
Prop In Lane 0.40 0.57 0.18 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 65 0 1385 1412 732 3036
V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.05 0.21
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 577 0 1385 1412 954 3036
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.5 0.0 2.2 2.2 1.3 1.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.4 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.7 0.0 1.3 1.4 0.1 0.2
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.9 0.0 2.5 2.5 1.4 1.1
LnGrp LOS D AAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 42 608 675
Approach Delay, s/veh 45.9 2.5 1.1
Approach LOS D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 68.1 5.6 62.4 6.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.0 11.0 26.0 26.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 2.3 5.4 3.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.4 0.0 3.7 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 3.2
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future With Project Cond itions 9: Pacific Ave & Bogart Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 44 516 47 41 662
Future Volume (veh/h) 30 44 516 47 41 662
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 33 48 561 51 45 720
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222
Cap, veh/h 43 62 2478 225 707 2948
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.75 0.75 0.02 0.83
Sat Flow, veh/h 669 973 3388 299 1781 3647
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 82 0 302 310 45 720
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1662 0 1777 1817 1781 1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 0.0 3.8 3.8 0.4 3.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 0.0 3.8 3.8 0.4 3.2
Prop In Lane 0.40 0.59 0.16 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 106 0 1336 1366 707 2948
V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.24
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 576 0 1336 1366 925 2948
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.6 0.0 2.8 2.8 1.7 1.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.4 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 3.2 0.0 1.7 1.8 0.1 0.7
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.0 0.0 3.1 3.1 1.8 1.6
LnGrp LOS D AAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 82 612 765
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.0 3.1 1.6
Approach LOS D A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 66.2 5.8 60.4 8.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.0 11.0 26.0 26.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.2 2.4 5.8 5.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.0 0.0 3.7 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 4.7
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 10: Pacific Ave & Downing Ave Weekday AM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 9 6 37 10 60 6 666 28 29 588 42 Future Volume (veh/h) 30 9 6 37 10 60 6 666 28 29 588 42 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 0 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1 870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 33 10 7 40 11 65 7 724 30 32 639 46 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9 2 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 173 49 23 108 27 89 641 1347 1141 516 2666 192 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.02 0.79 0.79 Sat Flow, veh/h 925 491 231 430 267 889 757 1870 1585 1781 3362 242 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 50 0 0 116 0 0 7 724 30 32 337 348 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1647 0 0 1587 0 0 757 1870 1585 1781 1777 1827 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 13.3 0.4 0.3 3.6 3.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 13.3 0.4 0.3 3.6 3.7 Prop In Lane 0.66 0.14 0.34 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.13
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 245 0 0 224 0 0 641 1347 1141 516 1409 1448 V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.54 0.03 0.06 0.24 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 600 0 0 602 0 0 641 1347 1141 743 1409 1448 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.2 0.0 0.0 32.6 0.0 0.0 3.0 4.8 3.0 3.7 2.0 2.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.5 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.2 0.1 1.4 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.6 0.0 0.0 34.5 0.0 0.0 3.0 6.3 3.0 3.8 2.4 2.4 LnGrp LOS C A A C AAAAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 50 116 761 717
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.6 34.5 6.2 2.4
Approach LOS C C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 63.5 11.5 5.5 58.0 11.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.0 26.0 11.0 26.0 26.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.7 4.0 2.3 15.3 7.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.2 0.2 0.0 3.9 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.3
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing Conditions 10: Pacific Ave & Downing Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 9 7 6 51 5 42 16 607 50 62 665 18 Future Volume (veh/h) 9 7 6 51 5 42 16 607 50 62 665 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 0 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1 870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 10 8 7 55 5 46 17 660 54 67 723 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9 2 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 108 76 45 138 16 62 610 1340 1136 564 2826 78 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.03 0.80 0.80 Sat Flow, veh/h 440 810 486 698 168 663 717 1870 1585 1781 3532 98 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 25 0 0 106 0 0 17 660 54 67 364 379 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1736 0 0 1529 0 0 717 1870 1585 1781 1777 1853 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 11.6 0.7 0.7 3.9 3.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 11.6 0.7 0.7 3.9 3.9 Prop In Lane 0.40 0.28 0.52 0.43 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 229 0 0 216 0 0 610 1340 1136 564 1421 1482 V/C Ratio(X) 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.49 0.05 0.12 0.26 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 623 0 0 594 0 0 610 1340 1136 771 1421 1482 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.3 0.0 0.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 4.7 3.1 3.4 1.9 1.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.3 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 6.4 0.3 0.3 1.4 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.5 0.0 0.0 34.8 0.0 0.0 3.2 6.0 3.2 3.4 2.3 2.3 LnGrp LOS C A A C AAAAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 25 106 731 810
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.5 34.8 5.7 2.4
Approach LOS C C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 64.0 11.0 6.3 57.7 11.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.0 26.0 11.0 26.0 26.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.9 3.0 2.7 13.6 7.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.6 0.1 0.1 3.9 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.3
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future With Project Cond itions 10: Pacific Ave & Downing Ave Weekday AM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 9 6 37 10 60 6 466 48 29 523 42 Future Volume (veh/h) 30 9 6 37 10 60 6 466 48 29 523 42 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 0 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1 870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 33 10 7 40 11 65 7 507 52 32 568 46 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9 2 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 173 49 23 108 27 89 678 1347 1141 655 2640 213 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.02 0.79 0.79 Sat Flow, veh/h 925 491 231 430 267 889 808 1870 1585 1781 3330 269 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 50 0 0 116 0 0 7 507 52 32 303 311 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1647 0 0 1587 0 0 808 1870 1585 1781 1777 1822 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 7.8 0.7 0.3 3.2 3.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 7.8 0.7 0.3 3.2 3.2 Prop In Lane 0.66 0.14 0.34 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.15
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 245 0 0 224 0 0 678 1347 1141 655 1409 1445 V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.38 0.05 0.05 0.21 0.22 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 600 0 0 602 0 0 678 1347 1141 881 1409 1445 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0 .99 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.2 0.0 0.0 32.6 0.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 2.8 1.9 1.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 1.5 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.3 0.1 1.2 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.6 0.0 0.0 34.5 0.0 0.0 3.0 4.8 3.1 2.8 2.3 2.3 LnGrp LOS C A A C AAAAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 50 116 566 646
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.6 34.5 4.7 2.3
Approach LOS C C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 63.5 11.5 5.5 58.0 11.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.0 26.0 11.0 26.0 26.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.2 4.0 2.3 9.8 7.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.8 0.2 0.0 3.2 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.0
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Future With Project Cond itions 10: Pacific Ave & Downing Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour
Baldwin Park Zocalo Civic Plaza Project/1-22-4468-1 Synchro 11 Report LLG Engineers 04/21/2022
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 9 7 6 51 5 42 16 507 70 62 608 18 Future Volume (veh/h) 9 7 6 51 5 42 16 507 70 62 608 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 0 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1 870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 10 8 7 55 5 46 17 551 76 67 661 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9 2 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222
Cap, veh/h 108 76 45 138 16 62 640 1340 1136 627 2817 85 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.03 0.80 0.80 Sat Flow, veh/h 440 810 486 698 168 663 759 1870 1585 1781 3522 107 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 25 0 0 106 0 0 17 551 76 67 333 348 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1736 0 0 1529 0 0 759 1870 1585 1781 1777 1851 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 8.9 1.1 0.7 3.5 3.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 8.9 1.1 0.7 3.5 3.5 Prop In Lane 0.40 0.28 0.52 0.43 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 229 0 0 216 0 0 640 1340 1136 627 1421 1481 V/C Ratio(X) 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.41 0.07 0.11 0.23 0.23 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 623 0 0 594 0 0 640 1340 1136 835 1421 1481 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0 .98 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.3 0.0 0.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 4.3 3.2 2.9 1.8 1.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 4.9 0.5 0.2 1.2 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.5 0.0 0.0 34.8 0.0 0.0 3.2 5.2 3.3 2.9 2.2 2.2 LnGrp LOS C A A C AAAAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 25 106 644 748
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.5 34.8 4.9 2.3
Approach LOS C C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 64.0 11.0 6.3 57.7 11.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.0 26.0 11.0 26.0 26.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.5 3.0 2.7 10.9 7.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.2 0.1 0.1 3.6 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.1
HCM 6th LOS A
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-22-4468-1 Zocalo Park Project

APPENDIX C

TRAFFIC CONTROL WARRANT ANALYSIS

California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 4F – Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons November 7, 2014 Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals

Page 965 ends

Attachment #6
Exhibit F, City Council Minutes – Feb. 16, 2022 Meeting

motINALDW,d
HU40Ft•
SAN,GABReLqYALLEYt
4jL`D JA$'

AMENDED MINUTES

BALDWIN PARK CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL REGULAR MEETING
February 16, 2022, 7:00 P.M.

COUNCIL CHAMBER - 14403 E. Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, 91706

CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at approximately 7:06 p.m. by Mayor Estrada.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chief of Police Robert A. Lopez.

ROLL CALL
City Clerk Garcia performed roll call:

MEMBERS PRESENT:

Council Member Alejandra Avila
Council Member Paul C. Hernandez
Mayor Pro Tem Daniel Damian
Mayor Emmanuel J. Estrada
Council Member Monica Garcia - Excused

REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION DURING OPEN SESSION
City Attorney Tafoya announced the City Council will reconvene into closed session following the regular session and will report out at the conclusion of the closed session.

ANNOUNCEMENTS
The City Council are also members of the Board of Directors of the Housing Authority, and Finance Authority, which are concurrently convening with the City Council this evening and each Council Member is paid an additional stipend of $ 30 for attending the Housing Authority meetingand $ 50 for attendingthe Finance Authoritymeeting. 9

PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS & PRESENTATIONS
Cannabis Program Presentation presented by Benjamin Martinez, Director of Community Development and HDL Companies

PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Estrada opened Public Communications at approximately 7:43 p.m. 1) Greg Tuttle
2) John Rios
3) Katherine Loeser
Mayor Estrada closed public communications at approximately 7:53 p.m.

Regular Meeting Minutes— 02- 16- 2022

Page 1 of 7 ends

CONSENT CALENDAR

1. City of Baldwin Park' s Warrants and Demands
Motion to ratify the attached Warrants and Demands Register.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Paul Hernandez to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Hernandez, Avila, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes

2. Meeting Minutes
Motion to approve meeting minutes for the following City Council Meetings:

Special City Council Meeting of February 2, 2022.

Regular City Council Meeting of February 2, 2022.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Paul Hernandez to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Hernandez, Avila, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes

3. Treasurer' s Report— December 2021
Motion to receive and file the Treasurer' s Report for December 2021.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Paul Hernandez to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Hernandez, Avila, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes

4. Claim Rejection
Motion to reject the following claims and direct staff to send the appropriate notice of rejection to claimant( s):

Edwin Parra The claimant alleges POBAR rights were violated, discrimination, hostile work environment, harassment, and whistle blower retaliation.

Frank Real The claimant alleges POBAR rights were violated, discrimination, hostile work environment, harassment, and whistle blower retaliation.

Cetina Gonzalo The claimant alleges POBAR rights were violated, discrimination, hostile work environment, harassment, and whistle blower retaliation.

Jose Jimenez The claimant alleges POBAR rights were violated, discrimination, hostile work environment, harassment, and whistle blower retaliation.

Luis Valdivia The claimant alleges POBAR rights were violated, discrimination, hostile work environment, harassment, and whistle blower retaliation.

These government claims, and all government claims, should be considered as potential lawsuits in the future. Thus, it is requested that all City Staff, the Mayor and all Council Members refrain from making any statements, whether public or private in nature. It is important that no statements be made so as to not prejudice this claim in any way which can happen if public or private comments are made about this claim by City staff or Council Members.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Paul Hernandez to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Hernandez, Avila, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes Regular Meeting Minutes— 02- 16- 2022

Page 2 ends

5. Approve an Industrial Disability Retirement ( IDR) Claim for Joseph D. Bartolotti Motion to approve the IDR and Resolution No. 2022- 003 effectuating the approval.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Paul Hernandez to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Hernandez, Avila, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes

6. Approve an Industrial Disability Retirement ( IDR) Claim for Darryl R. Kosaka Motion to approve the IDR and Resolution No. 2022- 004 effectuating the approval.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Paul Hernandez to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Hernandez, Avila, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes

7. Ratify and Adopt Resolution to Approve Updates to the City of Baldwin Park Job Clarification Plan to include Revisions to the Class Specifications of Police Captain, Police Lieutenant and Police Sergeant
Motion to approve Resolution No. 2022- 005 to update the class specifications for Police Captain, Police Lieutenant and Police Sergeant, respectively and add accredited college institution.

MOTION: It was moved by Paul Hernandez, seconded by Daniel Damian to adopt Motioned. AYES: Hernandez, Damian, Estrada, Avila, [ 4— 0]. Passes

8. Award of Contract with Shaw Integrated Solutions for CIP22- 029 Replacement of Carpet for Teen Center
Motion to:

1. Waive formal bid procedures per the City' s Purchasing Ordinance No. 1101 and Baldwin Park Municipal Code Chapter 34 section 37 ( A); and

2. Authorize Director of Recreation & Community Services to Execute the Contract with Shaw Integrated Solutions.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Paul Hernandez to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Hernandez, Avila, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes

9. Approving the form of the Agreements to be used with the San Gabriel Valley Habitat for Humanity, Inc. to Implement an Acquisition and Rehabilitation Housing Program using HOME Investment Partnership Act Program Funds to Create Homeownership Opportunities
Motion to:

1. Approve the form of the attached Agreements for use in the Program; and

2. Authorize the Chief Executive Officer (" CEO") and City Attorney to carry out all subsequent and needed actions to proceed with the Program, including approving real estate purchase transactions, and executing agreements.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Alejandra Avila to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Avila, Hernandez, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes Regular Meeting Minutes— 02- 16- 2022

Page 3 of 7 ends

10.Consideration of an Agreement between the City of Baldwin Park and the San Gabriel Valley Regional Housing Trust to Provide Homeless Housing and Related Services for Homeless Families at 13167 Garvey Avenue
Motion to:

1. Approve the Resolution No. 2022- 006 directing the Chief Executive Officer ( CEO) to execute the Agreement between the City of Baldwin Park and the SGVRHT; and

2. Direct the Director of Community Development to prepare and invoice the SGVRHT for 25% of the HHPP grant award or $ 312, 500 within 30 days; and

3. Direct the Director of Community Development to prepare a site plan and schematic design for the housing developmentand, when ready, return to the City Council for review, discussion, and direction thereof; and

4. Authorize the Directorof Financeto make the necessaryappropriationsand budget adjustments for the HHPP grant funds.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Alejandra Avila to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Avila, Hernandez, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes

11. Second reading of Ordinance No. 1467 Entitled: " An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park, California, Amending Chapter 50 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code and Enacting a New Section in Chapter 50 Establishing Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Requirements Under Senate Bill ( SB) 1383 Related to Short- lived Climate Pollutants ( SLCP)" Motion to waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1467, entitled: " An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park, California, Amending Chapter 50 of the Baldwin Park Municipalc pal Code and Enacting a New Section in Chapter 50 Establishing Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Requirements Under Senate Bill ( SB) 1383 Related to Short- Lived Climate Pollutants ( SLCP)".

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Paul Hernandez to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Hernandez, Avila, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes

12. Adopt Resolution No. 2022- 007 Entitled " A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park Authorizing Submittal of Applications for all CalRecycle Grant and Payment Programs"
Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2022- 007 entitled, " A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park Authorizing Submittal of Applications for all CalRecycle Grant and Payment Programs".

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Paul Hernandez to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Hernandez, Avila, Damian, [ 4 — 0]. Passes

13. Award Professional Service Agreement to La Canada Design Group ( LCDG) for Landscape, Architectural and Engineering Design Services for the Completion of the Zocalo/Civic Center Park Plaza Project and Conceptual Designs for a New City Hall Annex Building and Facade Upgrades to the Exterior of the City Hall Building Motion to:

1. Authorize the Director of Public Works to execute a professional services agreement with La Canada Design Group Inc. ( LCDG) in the amount of $ 346, 770 for architectural and engineering design services of the Zocalo/ Civic Plaza Project; and Regular Meeting Minutes— 02- 16- 2022

Page 4 of 7 ends

2. Authorize the Director of Finance to appropriate $ 236, 480 from Fund No. 270 - SB- 129 California Natural Resources Agency/ California Department of Parks and Recreation, appropriate $ 34, 240 from Fund No. 275 — ARPA American Rescue Plan Act ( Loss Revenue Category), appropriate $ 76, 050 from Fund No. 245 — Prop C to fully fund the project; and

3. Authorize the Director of Finance to record the State Parks grant in the amount of 6, 000, 000 under Grant Fund No. 270 and make the necessary appropriations and budget adjustments; and

4. Authorize the Director of Public Works to process the necessary invoice and payment documentation.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Paul Hernandez to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Hernandez, Avila, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes

14. Approval of Employment Agreement with Veronica Alvarez for the Position of Accounting Manager
Motion to approve the agreement with Veronica Alvarez for the position of Accounting Manager and direct the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute it.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Paul Hernandez to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Hernandez, Avila, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes

CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE DISSOLVED COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed are considered to be routine business by the City Council and will be approved with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a City Councilmember so requests, in which case, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.

SA- 1 Successor Agency to the Dissolved Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park Treasurer' s Report— December 2021 Motion to receive and file the Treasurer' s Report for December 2021.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Alejandra Avila to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Avila, Hernandez, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes SA- 2 Successor Agency to the Dissolved Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park Warrants and Demands
Motion to ratify the attached Warrants and Demands Register.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Alejandra Avila to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Avila, Hernandez, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes SA- 3 Successor Agency to the Dissolved Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park Approving the Form of the Agreements to be used with the San Gabriel Valley Habitat for Humanity, Inc. to implement an Acquisition and Rehabilitation Housing Program using Low- and Moderate- Income Housing Funds to Create Homeownership Opportunities
Motion to:

1. Approve the form of the attached Agreements for use in the Program; and Regular Meeting Minutes— 02- 16- 2022

Page 5 of 7 ends

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Paul Hernandez to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Hernandez, Avila, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes

PUBLIC HEARING

15. FY 2022-23 Annual Action Plan Housing and Community Development Needs and Priorities Public Hearing
Motion to:

1. Conduct a public hearing to consider the city's housing and non- housing community development needs for the preparation of the FY 2022-23 Annual Action Plan; and

2. Following the public hearing, receive and file this report, any comments made by the Mayor, City Council, and/or residents during the public hearing, for inclusion in the Fiscal Year 2022- 23 Annual Action Plan.

Mayor Estrada opened the public hearing at approximately 8: 07 p. m., seeing no one wishing to speak in favor or opposition of the item, Mayor Estrada closed the public hearing at 8:07 p.m.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Alejandra Avila to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Avila, Hernandez, Damian, [ 4— 0]. Passes

REPORTS OF OFFICERS

16. Consideration of Ordinance of the City of Baldwin Park to Establish Campaign Contribution Limits and Penalties in Baldwin Park
Motion to consider the new ordinance with added amendments introduce for first reading, by title only, Ordinance entitled: " An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park Establishing Campaign Contribution Limits and Penalties" and direct staff to bring back for second reading and adoption at the next regularly scheduled City Council Meeting. Delete Section 40. 03 delete. Section 40. 15 amended. Add section

40. 16 Amendments: Any amendments to this Ordinance shall not act to weaken the Ordinance or act in a manner that is counter to the spirit, purpose, or intent of the Ordinance. Amendment or repeal of any portion of this Ordinance, except mandated by a court of law, shall require a four-fifths vote of the City Council, except for amendments that are clerical or act to further clarify clauses in the Ordinance.

MOTION: It was moved by Emmanuel Estrada, seconded by Daniel Damian to adopt Motioned. AYES: Estrada, Damian, Avila, Hernandez, [ 4— 0]. Passes Direction to add ordinance to the ballot in November Election and bring staff report with the cost of adding to the ballot.

Regular Meeting Minutes— 02- 16- 2022

Page 6 of 7 ends

CITY COUNCIL / CITY CLERK / CITY TREASURER / STAFF REQUESTS &

COMMUNICATION
Mayor Pro Tern Daniel Damian requestsCity Councildiscussionand directionto move the City of Baldwin Park's annual parade from the month of November to the month of December. Also, bring back a proposed budget for the Downtown Street Market and Concerts in the Park events to the next meeting.

The City Council recessed back into Closed Session at approximately 8: 53 p. m. and reconvened into open session at approximately 10:34 p.m.

REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Tafoya announced no reportable action was taken.

ADJOURNMENT
Therebeingnootherbusinessto discuss, a motionwas madeby MayorEstrada, secondedby Mayor Pro Tern Damian, to adjournthe meetingat approximately10:32 p.m.

ATTEST: r j!
Emmanue da, Mayor
Marlen Garcia, City Clerk
APPROVED: June 7, 2022

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS:

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
I, ShirleyQuinones, ChiefDeputyCityClerkof theCityof BaldwinParkdo herebycertifythat the foregoingactionswere taken by the City Councilof the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof held on February 16, 2022
V
moPkAI
vyyllinones
Chief D.'• uty City Clerk
Regular Meeting Minutes— 02- 16- 2022

Page 7 of 7 ends

Attachment 7
Exhibit G, 2016 Downtown TOD Specific Plan (https://
www.baldwinpark.com/DocumentCenter/View/1947/BP-
DowntownTODSpecificPlan-Final2016-PDF)

Attachment #8
Exhibit H, Site and Vicinity Photos

Vicinity Map

LOCATION: Northwest Intersection of Maine Avenue
and Pacific Avenue and extends South of
Maine Avenue

CASE NUMBER: TPM 84199

DATE: February 14, 2024

AREA MAP
Not to Scale
N

Subject
Property

View from City Hall Civic Plaza

View of Southeast corner of Project

View of West side of Project

View of Southwest corner of Project

Attachment 9
Exhibit I, Letter of Opposition dated June 27, 2023

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
2010 Main Street, 8th Floor | Irvine, CA 92614-7214
Telephone: 949.553.1313 | Facsimile: 949.553.8354
www.allenmatkins.com
K. Erik Friess
E-mail: [email protected]
Direct Dial: 9498515478 File Number: 393765.00001/4857-7660-3243.4

Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Century City | San Francisco Allen Matkins

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
June 27, 2023
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
c/o Christopher Saenz, City Clerk
14403 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706

Email: [email protected]

Re: Agenda Item No. 2 for the June 28, 2023, Planning Commission meeting: Objections to City of Baldwin Park's adoption of a tentative parcel map (TPM 084199)
Dear Planning Commissioners:

This firm represents the Asher family, who are owners of the property located at 14402 Pacific Avenue (held under the legal entity 14418 Pacific Avenue LLC). And this letter is a formal objection to the City of Baldwin Park's proposed adoption of a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 084199) at the June 28, 2023, Planning Commission public hearing, Agenda Item No. 2.

We have been in contact with the City and its outside counsel since April 13, 2023, regarding the City's unconstitutional taking of the Asher's property and the City’s improper attempts to vacate Maine Avenue in connection with the construction of the Zocalo Civic Plaza. As you are aware, the City demolished Maine Avenue in furtherance of the Zocalo Civic Plaza project without first making any of the required findings to support such a drastic action, without complying with the street-vacation procedures and requirements set forth in the California Streets and Highways Code, and without complying with other laws. We have raised these concerns in multiple letters that were previously sent to the City in connection with its approval of the Zocalo Civic Plaza. The City has, to date, failed to reverse course and to remedy these violations of law.

It now appears that the City is attempting to use approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 084199 as a post-hoc mechanism to “cure” the City’s prior violations, including its failure to properly vacate Maine Avenue prior to its demolition. This will not work.

As outlined more fully below, TPM 084199 should not – and cannot – be approved by your body nor the City Council for the following reasons: (1) the approval of TPM 084199 would illegally incorporate previously condemned land originally taken for intersection expansion into this Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
June 27, 2023

Page 2 ends

park project; (2) TPM 084199 is inconsistent with the City’s Specific Plan governing development on the property; (3) the approval of TPM 084199 is not categorically exempt from review under CEQA; and (4) the City’s actions in demolishing Maine Avenue without properly vacating that roadway has effectively landlocked the Asher's property by unconstitutionally destroying their abutter's rights to Maine Avenue and Pacific Avenue.

We note that the Staff Report recommends that the Planning Commission continue consideration of Agenda Item No. 2 to a future date uncertain. We agree with this recommendation and believe that further discussions and City actions are necessary to for the City to cure the many legal deficiencies of the Zocalo Civic Plaza project, many as outlined below.

The City does not have the legal right to use condemned property for public-plaza and City- park purposes
Many years ago, the City condemned a portion of what is now the Asher family's property for the purpose of widening the intersection of Maine Avenue and Pacific Avenue. The City never moved forward with expanding the intersection, and the condemned area remains in the same condition as it did prior to condemnation.

The City is prohibited from using this condemned property for a public use other than the use designated in the condemnation unless and until the City adopts a resolution, after proper notice and other due process, authorizing a different use of the property. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1245.245, subd. (a).) Consolidation of the condemned parcel for the construction of a public plaza and park runs contrary to the public use on which the condemnation was based and would constitute a statutory violation by the City.

Further, condemned property that is not utilized for the public use stated in the resolution of necessity within ten years of the adoption of the resolution of necessity is required to be offered back to the property owner absent a new resolution or a reauthorization resolution. (See Code Civ.

Proc. § 1245.245, subd. (b); see also Rutgard v. City of Los Angeles (2020) 52 Cal.App.5th 815.) The City has failed to satisfy these requirements. The condemned property was never utilized for expansion of the intersection of Maine Avenue and Pacific Avenue within ten years of the adoption of the resolution of necessity that authorized the condemnation, and the City subsequently failed to offer the property back to the owner as required.

By failing to comply with these mandatory statutory provisions, the City is in illegal possession of the condemned portion of the Asher family's property. The City has no legal right to consolidate this portion of land into the proposed Zocalo Civic Plaza project and must immediately make a statutory offer to sell the land.

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
June 27, 2023

Page 3 ends

The City's current Specific Plan does not contemplate the closure of Maine Avenue, thus the City's demolition of Maine Avenue is inconsistent with the Specific Plan The Planning Commission must deny approval of a Tentative Parcel Map if it finds that the proposed map is not consistent with the City's General and Specific Plans (Gov. Code, § 66474, subd. (a).) The City's current Downtown Specific Plan (adopted on March 16, 2022) does not describe nor depict the Zocalo Civic Plaza at all and certainly does not mention the closure of Maine Avenue between Sterling Way and Pacific Avenue.

The only part of the current Downtown Specific Plan that could even be reasonably construed to apply to the Zocalo Civic Plaza is a reference to a "renewed civic park." (2022 Downtown Specific Plan, p. 26.) However, the civic park is described as "the space in front of City Hall along Pacific Avenue," and there is no extension of the park depicted or described along the section of Maine Avenue (which has already been demolished by the City). In fact, the current Downtown Specific Plan identifies Maine Avenue as one of the “core streets” that supports transit in the Downtown Specific Plan area and is designated as a collector street. (Downtown Specific Plan, pp. 14, 15.)
While, the Zocalo Civic Plaza is mentioned in an outdated version of the Downtown Specific Plan (February 2016), that old Specific Plan states that an environmental review is required: "In order to maximize usable space and allow a larger site, the portion of Maine Avenue between Sterling Way and Pacific Avenue could be closed, either fully or partially (one lane only).

This may, however, cause impacts to vehicular circulation and will need to be studied further before the design is finalized." (2016 Downtown Specific Plan, p. 28.) This is further supported in the City's October 2015 Downtown Specific Plan Final Environment Impact Report, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program that called on the City Planning and Engineering Departments to evaluate the loss of service to Maine Avenue and other traffic issues prior to approval of projects that would affect this intersection and roadway areas. (2015 EIR, MMRP, p. 52.) There is no record of the City’s conducting the required analysis dictated in its own Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report.

The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is in no way consistent with the City's current Downtown Specific Plan and does not comport with the required studies required by earlier iterations of the Downtown Specific Plan. Thus, the Planning Commission must deny the Tentative Parcel Map.

The Zocalo Civic Plaza project is not categorically exempt from CEQA review The Zocalo Civic Plaza project does not satisfy the elements for a Class 32 CEQA exemption, as the City's staff asserts in the staff report, and the City has admitted as much in the Downtown Specific Plan and previous public hearings.

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
June 27, 2023

Page 4 ends

A project must meet five requirements to be characterized as an in-fill development under CEQA’s Class 32 (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15332). If any of the five requirements are not met, a project cannot be considered categorically exempt from CEQA review. One requirement is that "approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality." (Ibid.) Here, the destruction of a core street (Mane Avenue) will undoubtedly result in a significant impact to traffic.

Specifically, to facilitate construction of the Zocalo Civic Plaza project, the City has already demolished a section of Maine Avenue, which in turn destroyed access to the intersection with Pacific Avenue and access to the Asher family's property. As previously mentioned, Maine Avenue is identified as one of the “core streets” that supports transit in the Downtown Specific Plan area and is designated as a “collector street.” (2022 Downtown Specific Plan, pp. 14, 15.) Additionally, Mayor Pro-Tem Monica Garcia publicly stated that closing Maine Avenue will “significant[ly] impact the circulation of traffic.” (October 19, 2022, City Council Hearing, at 1:55.) Any argument that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA review and would not "result in any significant effects relating to traffic" is disingenuous and runs contrary to the City's previous public assertions. Therefore, it would be improper for the City to consolidate the parcels and otherwise develop the project without proper CEQA review.

The City has unconstitutionally destroyed the Asher's abutter's rights.

Once a city has formally accepted a street as part of the public road system, the owners of property abutting the street gain specific property rights; namely, the abutting owners have the right of access over the street to and from their property. (Clay v. City of Los Angeles (1971) 21 Cal.App.3d 577, 581.) Once these abutter’s rights are established, a city is obligated to maintain the access. And if a city damages, obstructs, or eliminates that access, the city must compensate the owner of the property. (Id. at p. 587.) Abutting property owners also have the right to:
(1) maintain a view from the street so that travelers can see the property and thereby be induced to enter it to do business; (2) receive light and air from the public street; and (3) have the street space kept open so that signs on the lot are visible to those passing by. (Short Line Associates v. City and County of San Francisco (1978) 78 Cal.App.3d 50, 55.)
The history of the property and the City’s own planning documents clearly demonstrate that the Asher family had abutter’s rights to both Maine Avenue and Pacific Avenue. There is no question that Maine Avenue and Pacific Avenue are part of the City’s public road system. As noted above, the City identified Maine Avenue as a “core street” within the downtown area. (Downtown Specific Plan, p. 14.) Pacific Avenue is identified as a “core street” too. (Ibid.) There is also no question that the Asher family’s property was abutting Maine Avenue and Pacific Avenue. There are two very clear and obvious driveways that connect the Asher family’s Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
June 27, 2023

Page 5 ends

property to the public road system: one that connects to Maine and one that connects to Pacific.

Furthermore, while the City owned the land where the two driveways were located, the City’s ownership of that land stemmed from an old condemnation action by which the City condemned the land in order to widen and extend Pacific Avenue, so the land is part of those streets.

Because the condemnation was for roadway purposes, it did not eliminate any access rights related to the Asher’s family property; instead, when the City altered the streets in the future, the Asher family’s access would have been to the streets once altered and, until then, they have the right to access across the condemned right-of-way. Thus, the Asher family has abutter’s rights in both Maine and Pacific Avenues that the City has illegally destroyed by commencing construction of the project.

Conclusion
There is no legal basis for the Planning Commission to approve the proposed Tentative Parcel Map. The City is attempting to illegally incorporate previously condemned land originally taken for intersection expansion into this park project, the City has completely disregarded its own Specific Plan, which is not consistent with the proposed Tentative Parcel Map, the City is falsely claiming that this project is categorically exempt from CEQA review, and the City has landlocked the Asher's property by unconstitutionally destroying their abutter's rights to Maine Avenue and Pacific Avenue. The City has already closed and demolished Maine Avenue, and any attempt to "vacate" the street through the adoption of a Tentative Parcel Map is a sham, a post-hoc justification that will not withstand judicial scrutiny. We agree with Staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission continue Agenda Item No. 2 to a future date. In the alternative, the Planning Commission must deny the Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 084199).

Very truly yours,
K. Erik Friess
KEF:slp
cc: via email:

Alexander N. Brand, Esq. ([email protected])
Ron Garcia ([email protected])

Attachment #10
Exhibit J, Letter of Opposition dated February 14,
2024

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
February 14, 2024
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
c/o Christopher Saenz, City Clerk
14403 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706

Email: [email protected]
[email protected]

Re: Agenda Item No. 2 for the February 14, 2024, Planning Commission meeting: Objections to City of Baldwin Park’s adoption of a tentative parcel map (TPM 084199)
Dear Planning Commissioners:

The City of Baldwin Park should be ashamed.

It has blatantly violated the law. And the City’s violations of the law include taking the Asher family’s property without required process, in violation of the United States and California Constitutions. As a result of these violations of the law, the City is embroiled in litigation, the City will soon have its park project shut down by court order, the City will have to pay the Asher family just compensation, and the City will have to reimburse the Asher Family for their substantial – and growing – attorneys’ fees.

Look outside City Hall, and you can see for yourselves that the City already has tractors rolling on the park project that you are just now being asked to approve – really to rubberstamp.

The City’s actions in illegally demolishing Maine Avenue have inversely condemned the Asher family’s property, resulted in a public nuisance and a private nuisance, and qualify as a misdemeanor under Penal Code section 372.

Do not sign on as accomplices to the City’s existing violations of the law. And do not become direct perpetrators of still more City violations of the law by rubberstamping Agenda Item no. 2.

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
February 14, 2024

Page 2 ends

More specifically, please accept this letter as a formal objection to the City of Baldwin Park’s proposed adoption of a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 084199) at the February 14, 2024, Planning Commission public hearing. The proposed adoption of TPM 084199 is a complete farce designed only to head-off a motion for preliminary injunction that this firm is preparing on behalf of the Asher family.

The Asher family owns the properties located at 14402 Pacific Avenue and 14410 Pacific Avenue. We have been in contact with the City and its outside counsel since April 13, 2023, regarding the City’s unconstitutional taking of the Asher’s property rights and the City’s improper attempts to vacate Maine Avenue in connection with the construction of the Zocalo Civic Plaza.

As you may be aware, TPM 084199 was set to be considered at the June 28, 2023, Planning Commission hearing. Realizing that the Planning Commission could not lawfully approve TPM 084199, staff recommended that the agenda item be continued to a later date. Then when our firm recently informed the City’s attorneys of our intent to file a motion for a preliminary injunction against the City related to this project, City staff rushed to place this agenda item before you in an attempt to use approval of TPM 084199 as a post hoc mechanism to “cure” the City’s many prior violations of the law, including the City’s failure to properly vacate Maine Avenue prior to demolition of the street. This will not work.

As outlined more fully below, you cannot legally approve TPM 084199 including because:
(1) TPM 084199 is inconsistent with the City’s Specific Plan; (2) the permanent closure of Maine Avenue violates the Mitigation Measures the City is required to enforce pursuant to the 2016 TOD Downtown Specific Plan EIR; and (3) any attempt to push through a post hoc ratification of the City’s illegal actions will never survive judicial scrutiny.

The State already audited the City regarding Zocalo Civic Plaza. The City must stop violating the law.

In about 2014, the City first contemplated construction of a public park and plaza near City Hall. And between 2014 and 2016, the City authorized over $500,000 in design services related to the project, but the City never approved a completed design let alone approved an actual park project, wasting the public’s $500,000.

This waste prompted Assembly member Blanca Rubio in 2017 to request that the State Controller’s Office audit the City’s handling of the project. Specifically, the Assembly member asked for an audit to determine:
whether Baldwin Park city council members followed the proper channels of approval and protocol, or not, when spending City funds on a proposed development project … During this process, there was a dispute among council members that the proper channels of approval were not followed and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
February 14, 2024

Page 3 ends

thus, the project was halted. The halting of this project has negatively affected the Baldwin Park community and taken away valuable land that could have been used for a public benefit.

One week after Assemblywoman Rubio lodged her formal request for a state audit, the City – knowing it had violated the law – abandoned the park project in favor of a mixed-use development.

In removing the park project from the public agenda, Councilmember Ricardo Pacheco explained that his motion to remove the item was “based on the County’s Park Assessment which did not identify this site as a recommended location for a park.” The State Controller’s Office subsequently completed the requested audit of the City and issued its written findings in 2020. Notably, Finding #1 entitled “[e]xpenditures of over $500,000 on an engineering project that was discontinued” determined:

The city did not explain why it developed plans for a park that the city could not afford to build or maintain. According to the city’s budget books, its Park Fees (Quimby Act) Fund had a fund balance of only $73,529 at June 30, 2016, after incurring costs for the Civic Center Plaza project construction documents. Public resources should be committed only after careful planning, analysis, and consideration.

Although the City had been caught red-handed violating the rules and planning laws, the City has continued to move forward with a park project in violation of the law.

The City’s current Specific Plan does not contemplate the closure of Maine Avenue, thus the City’s demolition of Maine Avenue is inconsistent with the Specific Plan.

After formally abandoning the project in 2017 to explore mixed-use development, the City began to again consider a public park and plaza adjacent to the Asher Family’s properties in 2021.

The City’s Staff Report alleges that the City Council directed staff to move forward with the Zocalo Civic Plaza project at its February 2022 City Council meeting when the 2016 Downtown Transit Oriented Specific Plan was the controlling planning document. This is flatly false; consistent with this falsity, it is not reflected in the meeting minutes attached to the Staff Report.

At the February 2022 meeting, the City Council approved only a professional services agreement with La Cañada Design Group for “landscape, architectural, and engineering design services” for the Zocalo Civic Plaza. The City flatly did not approve an actual park project.

Instead, in approving this professional services agreement, the City did not purport to approve the project itself, nor did it make any findings on the record that the project was consistent with the Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
February 14, 2024

Page 4 ends

City’s General Plan or Downtown Specific Plan. To date, no legislative body has made such determinations.

Further, several members of the City Council warned against the closure of Maine Avenue at a subsequent City Council meeting in October 2022 (at which time the project was still not formally approved and the 2022 Downtown Specific Plan was the controlling planning document).

For example, Mayor Pro-Tem Monica Garcia warned on the public record that the City had not fully considered the vacation of Maine Avenue and the resulting consequences, and that closing Maine Avenue would “significant[ly] impact the circulation of traffic.” Likewise, former City Councilmember Paul Hernandez warned on the public record that they City had not done “any type of outreach” regarding the closure of Maine Avenue.

As we pointed out in our June 2023 letter to the Planning Commission (a copy of which is enclosed), a tentative parcel map must be denied if the proposed map is not consistent with the City’s General and Specific Plans (Gov. Code, § 66474, subd. (a).) The City’s current Downtown Specific Plan (adopted on March 16, 2022) does not describe nor depict the Zocalo Civic Plaza and certainly does not mention the closure of Maine Avenue between Sterling Way and Pacific Avenue.

The only part of the 2022 Downtown Specific Plan that could even be reasonably construed to apply to the Zocalo Civic Plaza is a reference to a “renewed civic park.” (2022 Downtown Specific Plan, p. 26.) However, the civic park is described as “the space in front of City Hall along Pacific Avenue,” and there is no extension of the park depicted or described along the section of Maine Avenue which has already been demolished by the City. In fact, the current Downtown Specific Plan identifies Maine Avenue as one of the “core streets” that supports transit in the Downtown Specific Plan area and is designated as a collector street. (Downtown Specific Plan, pp. 14, 15.)
Regardless of when the City alleges the project was “approved,” the substantial inconsistencies between this project and the current Downtown Specific Plan require a full Environmental Impact Report to assess their impact. In the language of the California Environmental Quality Act, these are “substantial changes [that] occur[red] in the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken that will require major revisions in the EIR.” The permanent closure of Maine Avenue violates the Mitigation Measures the City is required to enforce pursuant to the 2016 TOD Downtown Specific Plan EIR.

Even if the Planning Commission were to be convinced that the project was somehow approved before the adoption of the current Downtown Specific Plan (which it was not), the old 2016 Downtown Specific Plan states that an environmental review is required: “[i]n order to maximize usable space and allow a larger site, the portion of Maine Avenue between Sterling Way and Pacific Avenue could be closed, either fully or partially (one lane only). This may, however, Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
February 14, 2024

Page 5 ends

cause impacts to vehicular circulation and will need to be studied further before the design is finalized.” (2016 Downtown Specific Plan, p. 28.)
To that end, the City’s 2016 Downtown Specific Plan Final Environment Impact Report contemplates a partial vacation of Maine Avenue in connection with the Zocalo Civic Plaza, but imposes a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program that the City is required to enforce pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6 and CEQA Guidelines section 15097. Namely, Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 calls for the “conver[sion] of Maine Avenue between Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way to a one-way (westbound) only roadway. This shall be achieved by the relocating of Maine Avenue to be located along the rear of the commercial uses fronting Ramona Boulevard between Pacific Avenue and Sterling Way.” Clearly, the Tentative Parcel Map at issue does not conform with this requirement. Rather, it proposes to fully vacate Maine Avenue and construct a narrow alley along the rear of Ramona Boulevard instead.

Notwithstanding this required mitigation measure, the Staff Report attempts to offer an August 2022 Transportation Assessment as evidence that it has studied the closure of Maine Avenue as required by the 2016 Downtown Specific Plan. But, by the City’s own purported timeline, this assessment would have been delivered to the City six months after it claims to have approved the Zocalo Civic Plaza at the February 2022 City Council meeting. In making this claim, the City is not even pretending to have followed the law.

Now, the Staff Report asks the Planning Commission to bestow “approval” of its actions by making a finding that “pursuant to Public resources Code section 2116 and CEQA Guidelines section 15162, the Project was analyzed by the 2016 TOD Downtown Specific Plan EIR (Exhibit C) and Addendum to the 2016 TOD Downtown Specific Plan EIR (Exhibit D), as well as the Transportation Assessment (Exhibit E) that was prepared for the Project and that no further environmental review is necessary.”
If you rubberstamp this, you will be lying.

As detailed above, the City has not complied with the 2016 Downtown Specific Plan Final EIR’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program required by CEQA, and the City did not consider the Transportation Assessment before plowing ahead with this project.

The Zocalo Civic Plaza was never formally approved by the City and any attempt to push through a post hoc ratification of the City’s illegal actions will not sustain judicial scrutiny.

At this stage, any attempts to cure the litany of deficiencies relating to this park project will not hold up in court. Construction of the Zocalo Civic Plaza has been underway for over a year, during which time Maine Avenue was completely demolished, as depicted on the following page.

Instead of seeking approval for TPM 084199 before beginning construction and before demolishing Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
February 14, 2024

Page 6 ends

a public street, the City waited until it was faced with a preliminary injunction to seek a rubberstamp from you.

Again, the City never formally approved the Zocalo Civic Plaza, did not vacate Maine Avenue pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 8300 et seq. before demolishing the street, has not enforced Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 as required by 2016 Downtown Specific Plan Final EIR, and did not consider its own Transportation Assessment before moving ahead with the project.

Instead, the City is asking the Planning Commission to help lie to the public. It is too late for the Planning Commission to make the determinations that the Staff Report requests. As the California Supreme Court stated in Save Tara v. City of West Hollywood (2008) 45 Cal.4th 116, 129 “if postapproval environmental review were allowed, EIR’s would likely become nothing more than post hoc rationalizations to support action already taken.” Conclusion.

The Planning Commission cannot legally approve the proposed Tentative Parcel Map. The City has already closed and demolished Maine Avenue, and any attempt to “vacate” the street through the adoption of a Tentative Parcel Map is a sham, post hoc justification that will not

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
February 14, 2024

Page 7 ends

withstand judicial scrutiny. Commissioners do not make yourselves law breakers; and do not rubberstamp the City’s past lawbreaking; deny Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 084199).

Very truly yours,
K. Erik Friess
KEF:slp
Enclosure
cc: via email:

Mark Easter, Esq. ([email protected])
Alexander Brand, Esq. ([email protected])
Henry Andriano ([email protected])
Ron Garcia ([email protected])

Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Century City | San Francisco Allen Matkins

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
June 27, 2023
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
c/o Christopher Saenz, City Clerk
14403 East Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706

Email: [email protected]

Re: Agenda Item No. 2 for the June 28, 2023, Planning Commission meeting: Objections to City of Baldwin Park's adoption of a tentative parcel map (TPM 084199)
Dear Planning Commissioners:

Page 2 ends

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
June 27, 2023

Page 3 ends

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Attorneys at Law
City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission
June 27, 2023

Page 4 ends

The City has unconstitutionally destroyed the Asher's abutter's rights.

Page 5 ends

Baldwin Park City CouncilMay 15, 2024

Baldwin Park City Council
May 15, 2024